HomeMy WebLinkAbout690289.tiffDate:
To:
NELSON, HALEY, PATTERSON AND QUIRK, INC.
2021 CLUBHOUSE DRIVE
February 25, 1969
Weld County Planning Commission
Weld County Courthouse
Greeley, Colorado 80631
Gentlemen:
GREELEY, COLORADO 60831 PHONE 303: 352.8077
Project No. 66 00 089
Project:
Town of Pierce, Colorado
Sewage Improvements
We are transmitting Herewith X Under Separate Cover
No. of
Copies
3
❑ As Requested
For Approval
❑ Approved As Noted
❑ Revised
DLL/mji
3 /i 4,
3), 1/
Description or Remarks
Application for Approval of Location for
Sewage Treatment Facilities and supporting
documents.
Please have all three copies of this form
signed on the reverse side by the Planning
Commission Chairman and the Board of County
Commissioners.
If you will call us when all signatures have
been obtained, we will pick these up at your
office.
Your prompt attention is appreciated.
❑ For Your Records
❑ For Correction and Resubmission
Very truly yours,
NELSON, HALEY, PATTERSON, and QUIRK, INC.
Jt
David L. Limes, P.E.
By:
OFFICES IN GREELEY AND GRAND JUNCTION. COLORADO
l_r105
690289
COLORADO STATE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH
WATER POLLUTION CONTROL COMMISSION
4210 East 11th Avenue
Denver, Colorado 80220
APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF LOCATION
FOR
SEWAGE TREATMENT FACILITIES
Submit in duplicate. Complete only Parts A & B. See Instructions.
Applicant:
Address:
T0:^? Or PIERCE, COLORADO
Town Hall, P. 0. Box 57, Pierce, Colorado 80650
Telephone: 834-2798
A. INFORMATION REGARDING PROJECT SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW:
1. Size and type of treatment facility: Oxidation pond - 6 acre surface area
2. Location of facility: Southwest Quarter (SW1/4) of Section 25, Township
8 North, Range 66 West, Weld County, Colorado
3. Location of effluent discharge: 400 feet + north and 300 feet + east of
Southwest Corner, Section 25, Township 8 -North, Range 66 West, in Spring Creek.
4. Describe and give distance downstream of water plant raw water intake or intake
nearest this effluent discharge: None known
5. Name of watercourse into which
effluent is discharged: Spring Creek
6. Est. bid opening date: April 1, 1969 Est. completion date: June 1, 1969
7. Est. project cost: See attached report
8. Project layout and design criteria: (Attach separate sheets or report showing
entire service area with respect to surrounding areas, habitable buildings,
location of potable water wells within 4 mile, effluent discharge point and
topography of area.) See attached report
9. Consulting Engineer NELSON, HALEY, PATTERSON and QUIRK, INC., Engineering
Consultants
Address: 2021 Clubhouse Drive, Greeley, Colorado 80631 Telephone:352-8077
The undersigned applicant agrees to supply information necessary for Review of Plans
and Specifications and to secure signatures of the appropriate local government
officials prior to submission. TOWN, OF PIERCE, COLORADO
February 20, 1969 j"z c�, ,�� !i <2"e74- .,r
Date Signature of Applicant
Benjamin P. Gallatin, Mayor
Typed Name
B. SIGNATURES OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS: The undersigned* have reviewed the
proposal for the location, construction, operation and point of effluent discharge
of the above -described sewage treatment facility, and CERTIFY APPROVAL or DISAPPROVAL
in space provided below:
DATE APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL
7/i y /7-7 / /
/;'/ / /
/ / / /
/ / / /
Signature for local Health Department
Signature for Planning Commissron
Signature for Board of County Commissioners
Signature for Mayor or City Manager of
Municipality
*Before plans and specifications will be accepted for review, the applicant must show
hereon the action taken on the project by the Local Health Officers, representative
of the Planning Commission, representative of. the Board of County Commissioners, and
the Mayor or City Manager of the municipality that might be affected by the discharge
of this waste.
C. THE FOLLOWING FOR STATE HEALTH DEPARTMENT USE:
I, the undersigned District Engineer, have the following comments:
1. Is this plant located so that it can serve the needs of the present and/or
future logical service area?
2. Is the plant located where it is likely to create nuisance problems for
existing or now planned development?
3. Has a sufficient amount of suitable land been set aside for expansion?
�. Has the developer or owner of the facility made provision for adequate funding
to buy, maintain, operate and repair or replace in kind the facility?
5. Are there any community water supply intakes within 5 miles downstream of the
effluent discharge points?
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Date:
WPC-3(Rev.10-66-20)
Signature:
Hello