HomeMy WebLinkAbout981597.tiff SUMMARY OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
Tuesday, August 4, 1998
A regular meeting of the Weld County Planning Commission was held July 21, 1998, in the County
Commissioners' Hearing Room (Room#101), Weld County Centennial Building, 915 10th Street, Greeley,
Colorado. The meeting was called to order by Chair, Marie Koolstra, at 1:35 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Marie Koolstra Present
Jack Epple Absent
Glenn Vaad Present
Cristie Nicklas Absent
Fred Walker Present -�
Bruce Fitzgerald Present
7
Michael Miller Present -
Stephan Mokray Present
Arlan Marrs Present
Also Present: Monica Daniels-Mika, Director, Sheri Lockman, Planner, Julie Chester, Planner, Eric Jerman,
Planner, Ben Patton, Planner, Department of Planning Services; Lee Morrison, Assistant County Attorney;
Trevor Jiricek, Sheble McConnellogue, Weld County Health Department; Don Carroll, Weld County Public
Works; Wendi Inloes, Secretary.
The summary of the last regular meeting of the Weld County Planning Commission held on July 21, 1998,
was approved as read.
CASE NUMBER: USR-1193 -Continued from the July 21, 1998, hearing.
APPLICANT: Gary and Mary Novotny
PLANNER: Sheri Lockman
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: NW4 NE4 of Section 27, T2N, R62W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado.
REQUEST: Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit for a junkyard and salvage yard
in the A(Agricultural)zone district.
LOCATION: South of and adjacent to Weld County Road 18; west of Weld County Road 81.
The Chair asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for a quorum from the last
meeting. Marie Koolstra, Present; Glenn Vaad, Present; Arlan Marrs, Present; Stephan Mokray, Present;
Michael Miller, Present; Jack Epple, Absent.
Marie Koolstra explained that since this case had been heard at the July 21, 1998, hearing, there will not be
public testimony. The Planning Commission had made recommendations for additional Conditions and
Development Standards to be considered.
Sheri Lockman, Department of Planning Services, presented Case USR-1193, giving an overview. Sheri
stated that the Department of Planning is recommending approval of this application. Sheri entered into the
record two photographs from the last meeting, a referral from Southeast Weld Fire Protection District, a letter
from Alpha Engineering referring to the retention pond, and a map showing the new proposed site.
The following suggestions were made at the last meeting:
1. Limiting the site from 40 acres to 5 or 10 acres, with a pond retention plan
2. A 25 year, 24 hour storm retention plan
3. A maximum of 20 semi's on site at any one time, with the salvage being done inside
4. A six-foot screening
5. An environmental audit of the property
Gary Novotny, applicant,addressed the new conditions being proposed. Mr. Novotny stated that he has had
an engineer look at the property, and will be able to work within 5 acres including a retention pond, and have
20 trailers within the 5 acres, but is asking to do the work outside since the trailers will not fit inside his
�� y ,f building. Mr. Novotny has also looked into 8-foot chain-link fencing for the east side and 6-foot for the
,; remaining.
B j70 981597
SUMMARY OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
August 4,1998
Page 2
Glenn Vaad asked about the environmental audit. Mr. Novotny explained that he had been in contact with
the Health Department, and they had been out to the property. Glenn also asked if the audit would include
40 acres or the 5 acres. Lee Morrison, Assistant County Attorney stated, it would have to be within the 5
acres, if that is where the USR will be permitted for.
Trevor Jiricek, Weld County Health Department, explained the process of an audit, and the three different
levels. Trevor explained that a level one audit would require an audit of a record review, level two would be
a characterization, a more detailed site assessment, and level three may involve a remeadiation or additional
characterization. Level two and three would be triggered by level one. For a level one, every pertinent record
available would be reviewed, current and past property owners would be interviewed, and the site would be
reviewed and submitted into a report. Trevor explained that if no records are found stating something is
buried on the site, it would be difficult to justify a level two inspection. In this particular case,there are no such
records.
Sheble McConnellogue, Weld County Health Department, walked around the 40-acre site. Some concerns
she saw were the weeds that could become a fire hazard, tires on the property, which they are trying to get
rid of a load currently, and some diesel that needed to be cleaned up. Sheble stated that she has discussed
with Mr. Novotny some empty drums being disposed of, and would need to inform the Health Department what
the waste is and where it is going, along with any other disposal. Sheble stated she did not see any major
concerns at this time, and the cost for a level one audit would be a $2000 fee.
Glenn then stated that since the Health Department has been out, and Mr. Novotny has made an effort to
contact the appropriate people, if there is a problem, then the appropriate agencies should be contacted.
Glenn suggested striking the additional condition regarding the audit.
Sheri then read the following recommendations into the record:
Conditions of Approval:
1. The waste water collection and storage facilities shall be adequately constructed and sized to handle
a 25-year, 24-hour storm event.
2. The USE area shall be limited to 5 acres.
3. The west access tb the circle drive may be kept open if the derelict vehicles and debris are removed
and it is properly maintained as a residential access.
4. The maximum number of trailers allowed on the special use site shall be 20. No trailers will be stored
outside the special use area.
The Chair asked Mr. Novotny if he was in agreement with the amendments to the Conditions of Approval and
Development Standards. Mr. Novotny stated he was.
Glenn Vaad moved that Case USR-1193, be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners along with the
amendments to the Conditions of Approval and Development Standards with the Planning Commissions
recommendation of approval. Arlan Marrs seconded the motion.
The Chair asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Marie
Koolstra, yes; Glenn Vaad, yes; Arlan Marrs, yes; Stephan Mokray, yes; Michael Miller, yes; Jack Epple,
absent. Motion carried unanimously.
` g-j -9 7
SUMMARY OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
August 4,1998
Page 3
CASE NUMBER: USR-1195
APPLICANT: Bella Holsteins Go Gary Henrickson
PLANNER: Julie Chester
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Sections 19 &20, T3N, R66W of the 6th P.M.,Weld County, Colorado.
REQUEST: Site Specific Development Plan and Use by Special Review Permit for a Dairy and
Animal Feeding Operation for 5000 head of cattle.
LOCATION: South of and adjacent to Weld County Road 32.
Julie Chester, Department of Planning Services, presented Case USR-1195, reading the recommendation
into the record. Changes have been made to#2d, page 3. The Department of Planning is recommending
approval of the application along with the Conditions of Approval and Development Standards.
Arlan Marrs asked Julie about the additional comments given to them regarding a letter from the Health
Department. Trevor Jiricek, Weld County Health Department, explained the July 29, 1998, letter refers to a
site inspection July 16, 1998, and the submitted proposed manure and waste water management plan. The
original plan was submitted with the application, and it was decided to submit the Health Departments
preliminary comments along with the plan.
Glenn Vaad asked about the current amount of cattle and the number of cattle with the expansion. Julie
explained the applicant could better address this, and that he is allowed 960 by right at this time. Glenn also
asked about some organization that states 5,000 animals can be accommodated on this site. Trevor stated
the Health Department could address the issues on managing the waste produced by the animals, but not
animal husbandry practices.
Gary Henrickson, applicant, gave an overview of the application. Mr. Henrickson explained that he is wanting
to come into compliance with future growth in Weld County. 1800-2000 cows maximum will be milked at one
time, along with supporting females and males. They are asking for an additional alley way, milk barn, and
employee housing.
Michael Miller asked how many cattle are currently on the site. Mr. Henrickson stated there are 700 milking
cows, with a total of 1200 to 1300 head. 5000 head of cattle may be a large number, but is a safe number
at this time. Michael asked about a letter regarding sewage running into an adjoining ditch from a property
owner. Mr. Henrickson explained they have spent 30 to 40 thousand dollars on pipelines to be able to hold
the water movement, and have plenty of storage.
Stephan Mokray asked about concern with the water and the need for additional water from the Town of
Platteville. Mr. Henrickson stated that the Town of Platteville has had changes in town management, and he
has been in contact with each new individual, but it is difficult with all the changes, not having a consistent
person to work with. If Platteville does not want to give additional water to the dairy, the recourse is to come
1-1/2 miles from the north to bring in water from a new pipeline, but this would cost close to$100,000, with
tap fees. Mr. Henrickson would like to sit down with the town to work something out.
Arlan Marrs asked about the letter from the Health Department regarding the waste water plan. Mr.
Henrickson stated he just received the letter, but whatever they needed to do, they will be willing to do so.
Michael Miller asked about the water, and if the facility is dependant on the Town water for the operation. Mr.
Henrickson stated that there were two wells that run 6 to 10 gallons a minute. Another well has been drilled
with results of 10 to 12 gallons a minute, so there are currently three wells that run into a cistern. They do rely
on the City water, and take what they can get.
Tom Harren, consultant for Mr. Henrickson, spoke for the application. Mr. Harren did put together Mr.
Henricksons application, including the manure/waste water management plan, which is a state requirement,
and the nuisance control plan. Mr. Harren has done an on site inspection with both Julie Chester and Trevor
Jiricek. Mr. Harren stated that they have not sat down with the Town of Platteville, and would do so when a
permit is approved.
The Chair asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak for the application.
98/5 97
SUMMARY OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
August 4,1998
Page 4
Loren Berry, spoke in favor of the application. Mr. Berry stated he does most of the earth work for Mr.
Henrickson, and stated that, so far they have done all they need to do to meet the requirements.
Mike Veeman, spoke in favor of the application. Mr. Veeman has a dairy in Loveland of about 1700 head.
Mr.Veeman has known Mr. Henrickson for about 15 years, has seen many dairy facilities, and feels that Mr.
Henrickson manages and keeps his dairy very well. He has spent a lot of time and money on the dairy
addressing the layout on the water and drainage issues, and the room to expand. Mr. Veeman commented
that the press talks negatively about large livestock operations and when operators spend time and money
to do it right, and come forward for expansion, they should be supported.
The Chair asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak against this application.
Charles Kuechenmeister, Attorney for Town of Platteville, spoke in opposition. Mr. Kuechenmeister had the
following concerns:
The application is not in the Town of Platteville's comprehensive plan
The retention ponds running downhill
The close proximity to the Towns, being within the IGA boundary
The future land uses next to the property that is being proposed for residential uses, and possible
commercial uses down the road, and consolidating the uses are not compatible
*Annexation of a portion of the land in Section 19
*Transportation regarding WCR 27, odor, flies, water, dust and air pollution
Mr. Kuechenmeister entered into the record as exhibits'copies of pages and a map regarding future land use
from the comprehensive plan, a transportation plan, a water and sewer plan, an agreement with Central Weld
Water District, the IGA agreement between the Town and Weld County, and a annexation proposal with the
planning for the area. The Town has had a water agreement with the dairy since 1982, and does not feel
there is enough water for the expansion, and recommends denying the permit.
Man Marrs asked Mr. Kuechenmeister if there were any Planning Staff available. Mr. Kuechenmeister stated
there was not a planning staff, but did have some representatives of the Town available. Arlan stated it
seemed strange that the Town is planning residential and commercial development next to an existing dairy
facility. Mr. Kuechenmeister stated the Town is presently working on a new Comprehensive Plan that would
determine which direction the plans for the area will go, and at this level there are no substantial problems.
Arlan stated that the applicant is trying to plan for future expansion, however, the town is not sure what growth
will be. Mr. Kuechenmeister added that the present time, the dairy does not present the kind of concern that
a dairy two to three times, would present. Arlan asked what he is expecting in an increase in size. Mr.
Kuechenmeister stated the massive increase in odor, flies, and dust were the biggest concerns. Arlan asked
what plans the Town has in their new plans to compensate surrounding land owners when they are
influencing others operations. Mr. Kuechenmeister stated he could not answer that since consultants were
working on the plans. Arlan asked about the commerciaUndustrial development being an asset, and why was
the dairy facility not considered an asset for the Town. Mr. Kuechenmeister explained that the
commercial/industrial uses would generate sales taxes and revenue.
Michael Miller asked if it is was part of Platteville's plan to increase the capacity of water to service the
proposed expansion. Mr. Kuechenmeister is not aware of any plans, but would advocate it.
Glenn Vaad asked about the transportation plan and the potential of WCR 27, and the right-of-way not being
abandoned by the County. Mr. Kuechenmeister stated his research showed the potential between WCR 30
one mile north, through the petitioners property to WCR 32.
Julie Chester asked Mr. Kuechenmeister about the transportation maps submitted, and that WCR 27 is not
designated in their Comprehensive Plan's transportation plan. Mr. Kuechenmeister stated the map was
developed along with the water/sewer plan earlier this year.
Don Carroll, Public Works, stated he did ask the applicant to look into any dedication of right-of-ways by the
County that may be in place on the section line. Don stated the County has no reason at this time to make
it a road.
7
SUMMARY OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
August 4,1998
Page 5
Glenn Vaad asked how many people are included in the annexation. Mr. Kuechenmeister stated it included
the SE4 of Section 19, which was owned by a Mr. Harris.
Lee Morrison added that Mr. Kuechenmeister submitted two agreements with one already being in the record
on water service, exhibit 18 between the Town and the dairy, and the addendum to the water service
agreement, exhibit 38, between the Town and Central Weld Water District.
Michael Cowper, Mayor of Platteville, spoke in opposition of the application. Mr. Cowper had concerns the
dairy will have on the plans for growth. The Town does not get a lot of impact from the dairy today, but with
growth, there will be an impact. The Town is not moving out to conflict with agricultural operations, but the
Town has been around longer than the dairy, and the dairy is expanding, conflicting with the Town.
Arlan Marrs asked if there was an impact today on the Town. Mr. Cowper stated there was an impact on
ground water, air, and the cemetery. Arlan stated he wanted specifics on these impacts, Mr. Cowper stated
he had no specifics, but the nitrate level in the water has gone up. Arlan asked about studies done of the
nitrate levels and Mr. Cowper did not respond.
Stephan Mokray asked about the impact on the proposed development. Stephan stated that if Mr. Henrickson
is going to survive, he needs to expand. In all fairness,with all the money he has invested, would Platteville
be in a position to buy Mr. Henrickson out so he could move on. Mr. Cowper stated they are not in that
position, and have no problems co-existing at his current level of operation.
Arlan Marrs asked what Mr. Cowpers feeling was on the annexation on a residential development expanding
the outline of the Town up against the existing facility. Mr. Cowper explained that at this time it has not come
to any Board decision. The are still wanting more information from Mr. Harris.
The following also spoke in opposition of the application, James Barkley, Todd Harris, Karen Volty, Jane
Mamer, Charles Grasner, Lee Schumacher, and Linda Pointer
with the following concerns:
*Underground water and the water pressure
*Flooding
* Increase in odor and flies
*Closeness to the town
*The view being taken away by the growth of the dairy
*Transportation corridors
* Development next to the dairy not being productive
The IGA agreement between Platteville and Weld County
*Platteville is a growing town with new businesses, and it is less attractive to people with a 5,000 head dairy
*The disrespect to the cemetery
Increase in traffic
*Quality of life and resale of homes and property value going down
Gary Henrickson addressed the concerns from surrounding property owners. Mr. Henrickson feels that they
have addressed most concerns through his plans, and will be in full compliance with the regulations set. Mr.
Henrickson'stated he is sympathetic to the concerns, but feels there is a lack of education regarding the dairy.
He has spent a lot of time researching modern facilities across the United States, and given a chance, will
prove to be a good neighbor.
The Chair asked Mr. Henrickson if he was in agreement with the Conditions of Approval and Development
Standards, and the Health Department recommendations. Mr. Henrickson stated he was in agreement.
Fred Walker moved that Case USR-1195, be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners along with
the Conditions of Approval and Development Standards with the Planning Commissions recommendation of
approval. Stephan Mokray seconded the motion.
The Chair asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Marie
Koolstra, yes; Glenn Vaad,yes;Man Marrs, yes;Stephan Mokray, yes; Michael Miller, yes; Bruce Fitzgerald,
no; Fred Walker, yes. Motion carried. qg1 y Gf 7
SUMMARY OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
August 4,1998
Page 6
CASE NUMBER: USR-1196
APPLICANT: Mark and Janese Powell
PLANNER: Ben Patton
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot B of RE-795 located in Section 29, T5N, R64W of the 6th P.M., Weld
County, Colorado.
REQUEST: Site Specific Development Plan and Use by Special Review permit for a Veterinary
Clinic in the (A)Agricultural zone district.
LOCATION: Approximately 1/4 mile west of Weld County Road 53; 1-1/2 mile south of Weld County
Road 55-1/2; and approximately 1 mile south of Kersey.
Ben Patton, Department of Planning Services, presented Case USR-1196, reading the recommendation into
the record. The Department of Planning is recommending approval of the application, along with the
Conditions of Approval and Development Standards.
George Ottenhoff, attorney for the applicant, gave a brief overview of the application, also speaking on behalf
of application as a neighbor. Mr. Ottenhoff stated that there is a need for a clinic in the area, and supports the
clinic.
Arlan Marrs asked Mr. Ottenhoff if the clinic was currently in operation. Mr. Ottenhoff stated it is in operation,
and that Dr. Powell was here to come into compliance, being unaware of needing a permit. Mr. Ottenhoff did
ask that the Condition of Approval 2D regarding no activity occurring until the plat has been recorded, be
waived.
Arlan then asked if there were any issues on the driveway access to the property. Mr. Ottenhoff stated there
had not.
Stephan Mokray asked if this was a private driveway and is it a possibility that neighbors will complain about
the dust from customers. Mr. Ottenhoff stated this was a private driveway, and there had been no complaints,
and if it would become a problem, the Powells would take care of the problem.
Fred Walker asked how Mr. Powell became aware of the fact he was not in compliance. Dr. Powell explained
that he became aware by a Boulder County veterinarian.
The Chair asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak for or against this application. No
one wished to speak.
The Chair asked Mr. Powell if he was in agreement with Conditions of Approval and Development Standards.
Dr. Powell stated he was in agreement,with the exception of 2D. Ben stated there would be no problem with
this request.
Glenn Vaad moved to delete Condition of Approval#2D. Arlan Marrs seconded the motion.
The Chair asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Marie
Koolstra,yes; Glenn Vaad,yes;Arlan Marrs,yes; Stephan Mokray, yes; Michael Miller, yes; Bruce Fitzgerald,
yes; Fred Walker, yes. Motion carried unanimously.
Man Marrs moved that Case USR-1196, be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners along with the
Conditions of Approval,with the deletion of#2D,and Development Standards with the Planning Commissions
recommendation of approval. Glenn Vaad seconded the motion.
The Chair asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Marie
Koolstra,yes; Glenn Vaad,yes;Man Marrs,yes; Stephan Mokray, yes; Michael Miller, yes; Bruce Fitzgerald,
yes; Fred Walker, yes. Motion carried unanimously.
r1 iS97
SUMMARY OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
August 4,1998
Page 7
CASE NUMBER: USR-1197
APPLICANT: Hunt Feedyard Go David Hunt
PLANNER: Eric Jerman
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: NW4 of Section 33, T4N, R66W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado.
REQUEST: Site Specific Development Plan and Use by Special Review Permit for a Feedlot up to
10,000 head of cattle, located in the A(Agricultural)zone district.
LOCATION: South of and adjacent to Weld County Road 40; east of and adjacent to State Hwy 85.
Eric Jerman, Department of Planning Services, presented Case USR-1197, reading the recommendation into
the record. Eric stated that the Planning Department is recommending approval of the application, along with
the Conditions of Approval and Development Standards.
David Hunt, applicant, gave an overview of the application. Mr. Hunt stated that he has spent time with
neighbors and the Town of Gilcrest explaining his request, and they have no problems. Mr. Hunt explained
he does not plan for the feedlot to grow anymore than what he is requesting. Mr. Hunt did have concerns with
dust, but stated he does have plenty of water on his property, and would put in a sprinkler system to control
the dust if needed.
Arlan Marrs asked Mr. Hunt about how he felt on the paving of Weld County Road 40, and is this something
voluntarily. Mr. Hunt stated that he does not have a problem with the paving, but does feel the County should
share in the expense.
Arlan then asked Mr. Hunt about the landscaping requirement along Hwy 85. Mr. Hunt stated if this is
something that will make people more comfortable, he is willing to do so.
The Chair asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak for or against this application. No
one wished to speak.
Arlan asked staff about the landscape requirement along Hwy 85. Eric stated is was a standard comment and
would mitigate future problems. Arlan said he understood placing the condition on certain feedlots, but not
all of them, and is opposed to getting in the habit of putting them in all plans.
Tom Herran, representative of the applicant, stated that they do have conditions in nuisance control plans if
needed, and would address the dust issue in a nuisance management plan.
Arlan then asked Don Carroll, why there is a need for paving WCR 40. Don Carroll, Weld County Public
Works, explained that the need for the paving is to reduce dust that could cloud vision that would block the
railroad. Arlan feels that with the requirement for the private drive inside the operation to be paved, that the
County overstepping their bounds. With a stop sign in place for the railroad tracks, dust would not be a factor
if dust is coming from the east, and this is an expense to the operator. Arlan stated he would be more
comfortable with a calcium chloride product for the road, rather then mandating paving.
Fred Walker asked Don about the 286 feet portion he wants paved on Mr. Hunts property, and if it is currently
treated with calcium. Don stated he did not believe it was treated while he was there. Fred then commented
that he agreed with the County overstepping bounds on paving into private property. He also stated that the
buffering only hides the first row of feedlots, but not others following.
Michael Miller asked who would be responsible for maintaining the road. Don stated the County would be
responsible for the road, and the applicant would be responsible for the driveway.
Arlan Marrs moved change the wording in Condition of Approval#2E, page 5, be change from upgrading and
paving to dust abatement. Fred Walker seconded the motion.
The Chair asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Marie
Koolstra,yes; Glenn Vaad, yes;Arlan Marrs,yes; Stephan Mokray, yes; Michael Miller,yes; Bruce Fitzgerald,
yes; Fred Walker yes. Motion carried unanimously.
98i S9 7
SUMMARY OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
August 4,1998
Page 8
Arlan Marrs moved to delete Condition of Approval#6, page 6, regarding the landscaping. Stephan Mokray
seconded the motion.
Glenn Vaad felt the applicant is getting something from the County in adding to his feedlot, and by landscaping
would keep some consistency in these types of permits.
Bruce Fitzgerald commented that it is important to keep it in , and by landscaping it would screen from
Highway 85.
Arlan Marrs stated that in the County we talk about being pro-agricultural and encourage it, but we also want
to hide it so it cannot be seen. Arlan also stated that it is important that we do not start a regular condition on
all permits that landscaping plans be put into effect when it is not needed.
Michael Miller stated that he feels that since Hwy 85 is a main approach into Greeley, that we do try and dress
it up, in this case, but not all cases.
Mr. Hunt explained that he does not have a problem landscaping, but also does not want it mandated so that
it may block a view. Mr. Hunt will be doing some landscaping weather it is required or not, but would like to
understand what is being required.
Fred Walker stated he feels this should be more voluntary than mandatory, and it should be paid for by the
City of Greeley if they want Highway 85 to be the gateway to Greeley.
Bruce asked how this will be administered. Eric explained that the Planning Department would approve the
landscape plan along with help from Colorado Department of Transportation and Public Works to address
landscaping along the Highway and County Roads. Bruce asked about the distance of landscaping and if
there would be any flexibility. Eric stated there would be flexibility working with the applicant, and they are not
asking for total landscaping, but enough to break up the visual impact.
The Chair asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Marie
Koolstra, no; Glenn Vaad, no; Arlan Marrs, yes; Stephan Mokray, yes; Michael Miller, no; Bruce Fitzgerald,
no; Fred Walker, yes. Motion failed.
Arlan Marrs commented that if this Condition is left in, that this discussion will send a message to the Planning
Department, and in the future, this will be kept in mind.
The Chair asked Mr. Hunt if he was in agreement with the amendment to the Conditions of Approval and
Development Standards. Mr. Hunt stated he was in agreement.
Glenn Vaad moved that Case USR-1197, be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners along with the
Conditions of Approval and Development Standards with the Planning Commissions recommendation of
approval. Bruce Fitzgerald seconded the motion.
The Chair asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Marie
Koolstra, yes; Glenn Vaad, yes;Arlan Marrs,yes; Stephan Mokray,yes; Michael Miller, yes; Bruce Fitzgerald,
yes; Fred Walker, yes. Motion carried unanimously.
Meeting adjourned at 4:20 p.m.
Respectfully submitt
Wadi
Wendi Inloes
Secretary
9g155
Hello