HomeMy WebLinkAbout981344.tiff au
RESOLUTION
RE: ASSESSMENT OF COST OF IMPROVEMENTS FOR WELD COUNTY MARTIN
BROTHERS PUD LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 1997-1
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to
Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of
administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 30-20-607, C.R.S., as amended, a Statement of
Expenses and Apportionment has been filed with the Weld County Clerk to the Board by the
Weld County Engineer, which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A", and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 30-20-608, C.R.S., as amended, there has been proper
notice of this hearing and of the costs of the improvements, and the share to be assessed to
each lot, and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners finds that the properties described
herein, including Lots 2, 5 through 18, 20 and 22 of the Martin Brothers Planned Unit
Development-Amended Plat, as recorded under Book Number 1228, Reception Number
02175539, Film Number 1779, File Number 5025 in the records of the Weld County Clerk and
Recorder, all in relation to the 6th P.M., in an unincorporated portion of Weld County, Colorado,
in an area generally known as the Martin Brothers Planned Unit Development, have been
specifically benefitted by the construction of the improvements authorized under the Resolution
of February 4, 1998, for the following reasons:
1) The market value of the property will increase.
2) The proposed improvements will adapt the property to a more profitable use.
3) There will be an alleviation of fugitive dust, eliminating the health hazards to the
benefitted properties and to users of the public roads to be improved.
4) The alleviation of fugitive dust will reduce maintenance costs to the subject
properties and paving will lessen the maintenance required for a public road.
5) The proposed improvements will facilitate access to each of the properties and
thereby increase the convenience of the use of said property.
WHEREAS, copies of the resolution creating this local improvement district have been
provided to the Division of Local Government and the Weld County Treasurer and Assessor,
and
WHEREAS, at the time and place set forth in the notice, the Board of County
Commissioners met in open session for the purpose of hearing and considering any objections
and protests that might be made against the proposed assessments, and there being no
protests, complaints, or objections, and
WHEREAS, this resolution shall be prima facie evidence of the fact that the property
assessed is benefitted, the amount of the assessment, and that the assessment has been
lawfully levied.
111111111111 111111 MIII III 111111111111 III 11111 IIII IIII 981344
2646263 10/12/1998 12:38P Weld County CO SD0052
1 of 8 R 0.00 D 0.00 JA Sukt Tsukamoto
ASSESS COSTS - MARTIN BROTHERS PUD LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 1997-1
PAGE 2
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld
County, Colorado:
A. That a local improvement district for the construction and installation of street
improvements, to include shaping, grading, drainage, preparation of the base,
compaction and paving, together with any necessary incidentals on certain County
roads as hereinafter described, is hereby created and established in accordance
with the laws of the State of Colorado, and shall be known and designated as 'Weld
County Martin Brothers PUD Local Improvement District No. 1997-1." All
proceedings heretofore taken by the Board of County Commissioners and the
County staff and then ratified in connection with the district are hereby ratified,
approved and confirmed. This proposal to create said district was initiated by the
Board of County Commissioners by Resolution dated September 8, 1997, upon a
petition, proper in form, subscribed by a majority of the owners of property who will
bear the cost of more than one-half of the total proposed assessment in the district
and notice duly given as heretofore stated.
B. That the property to be assessed for said improvements shall be the properties
specifically benefitted by said improvements and more particularly described as
follows:
The area to be included within the district includes all or portions of
certain roads and streets within Lots 2, 5 through 18, 20 and 22 of
the Martin Brothers Planned Unit Development - Amended Plat, as
recorded under Book Number 1228, Reception Number 02175539,
Film Number 1779, File Number 5025 in the records of the Weld
County Clerk and Recorder, all in relation to the 6th P.M., Weld
County, Colorado, in an area in unincorporated Weld County
generally known as Martin Brothers Planned Unit Development,Weld
County, Colorado, being further described in the Petition for Local
Improvement District.
C. That the Statement of Expenses and Apportionment, attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference as Exhibit"A", has been submitted based upon
the fact that there has been completion of the entire local improvement as previously
authorized.
D. That the assessment, as set forth in the attached Exhibit "B", per lot or parcel being
levied for the improvements shall be due and payable within thirty (30) days after the
effective date of this assessing resolution. However, all such assessments may be
paid at the election of the owner, in ten equal, annual installments of principal with
installments of interest on unpaid installments at an interest rate of seven and
three-quarters percent (7.75%) simple interest per annum. The first of said
installments of assessment shall be due and payable at the same time as ad
valorem property taxes for the year 1998, due and payable in 1999, and similarly in
each successive year thereafter until all are paid in full.
1 MINIMUM Min 111111111111 III IMII rill 981344
2646263 10/12/1998 12:38P Weld County CO SD0052
2 of 8 R 0.00 D 0.00 JA Sukl Tsukamoto
ASSESS COSTS - MARTIN BROTHERS PUD LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 1997-1
PAGE 3
E. That cost of the improvements assessed to property within the district is $30,896.00,
which does not include $14,000 pledged to the project by Martin Brothers, LLC.
Total project cost is$44,896.00. The cost per lot based on an equal assessment on
17 lots shall be $1,817.42.
F. That the Clerk to the Board shall prepare a local assessment roll, in cooperation with
the Weld County Treasurer and Accounting Department, in a form showing in
suitable columns, each parcel of land assessed,the total amount of assessment, the
amount of each installment of principal and interest if, in pursuance of Part 6 of
Article 20 of Title 30, C.R.S., as amended, the same is payable in installments, and
the date when each installment will become due, with suitable columns for use in
case of payment of the whole amount or of any installment or penalty, and shall
deliver the same, duly certified, under the County seal, to the County Treasurer for
collection.
G. That failure to pay the whole assessment prior to December 31, 1998, shall be a
conclusive determination and held to be an election on the part of all persons
interested, whether under disability or otherwise, to pay in such installments. All
persons so electing to pay in installments shall be conclusively held and considered
as consenting to said improvements. Said election shall be conclusively held and
considered as a waiver of any right to question the power or jurisdiction of the
County to construct the improvements, the quality of the work, the regularity or
sufficiency of the proceedings, the validity or correctness of the assessments, or the
validity of the lien thereof.
H. That failure to pay any installment, whether principal or interest, when due shall
cause the whole of the unpaid principal to become due and collectible immediately,
and the whole amount of the unpaid principal and accrued interest shall thereafter
draw penalty interest at the rate of one percent per month from the first day of May
until the day of payment, or until the day of sale. In computing the amount of penalty
interest due under this section, any portion of a month shall be counted a whole
month.
That all resolutions or parts thereof in conflict with this resolution are hereby
repealed, but all portions of the resolution indicating the intent to create the district
not in conflict with the provisions of this resolution are re-enacted as if set forth
herein.
J. That the effective date of this resolution shall be September 23, 1998.
111111111111111111111111III111111111111 981344
2646263 10/12/1998 12:38P Weld County CO SD0052
3 of 8 R 0.00 D 0.00 JA Suki Tsukamoto
ASSESS COSTS - MARTIN BROTHERS PUD LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 1997-1
PAGE 4
The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by
the following vote on the 23rd day of September, A.D., 1998.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
WE1.,D COUNTY, COLORADO
ATTEST: Li/
J , w/ ( � Tv..�
/► ��°► Constance L. Harbert, Chair
Weld County Clerk t. e � FT ! 4( ) ) } 4
Wau'�
� 1 W. b er, ro-Tem
Deputy Clerk to� 'ac f ���
ek ����� rge . Baxter
AP D FORM: tale . all
ou y Att rney EXCUSED
Barbara J. Kirkmeyer
111111111111 MIME III 111111111111 III 11111 IIII IIII 981344
2646263 10/12/1998 12:38P Weld County CO SD0052
4 of 8 R 0.00 D 0.00 JA Sukl Tsukamoto
£+ hth, -71- 4
MEMORANDUM r7-
TO: Carol Harding, Clerk to the Board DATE: August 17, 1998
C FROM: Frank B Hempen, Jr.
Director of Public Works/County Engineer
•
COLORADO SUBJECT: Martin Brothers Local Improvement Dis rict
The construction on the Martin Brothers Local Improvement District has been completed. This
district financed improvements to the Martin Subdivision internal road system. This subdivision is
located in the northwest corner of WCR 10 and WCR 37. The total cost of this project was
$44,896.00. Martin Brothers, LLC contributed $14,000.00 to this project. The$30,896.00 contract
balance is to be evenly assessed to the 17 lots in the district. The cost per lot is $1,817.41.
Please proceed with the assessment hearing process.
cc: Commissioner Webster
Lee Morrison, Assistant County Attorney
Drew Scheltinga, Engineer III
In:\wpfiies\frank\marti n.me m
111111111111 111111 111111 111 1111111 11111 111 11111 IIII 1111
2646263 10/12/1998 12:38P Weld County Co
5 of 8 R 0.00 D 0.00 JR Suki Tsukamoto
por../4 ) J
. -1
( eJ ,,,,
L) v
4 ‘ixW
il M
Q
vb
�9 _ -
U-
a ° r
o q ry .I E .
Iry F I a
..� .i R/ �.../ ��
/ a)
N
1, � V
rvm 41I t v y v.
i o �.� tj .. J
s. r i1
C u
0 9 C y � \ ` n
LI W I V
xill
II 6
a tll`1 �l I ��
N IP
O
4 414
4 W
s > m L m 1. ,. `\
0 F a 0¢ 4 a
c.ui u.m m y� ail "II
j"'
..gym a wo r r V� l PIJ
m a W 11
ao u
Ill 0
CO
x o
4H
OAp
3N p0 m m m m
Cia 2u .ti .y .+nn
4 OI N�
aO.„ 1-, 1..�, O A�
o fl W FI a owl +sW�
u ^+.. t CO 01
a o ° m -Af' tot .�W
0 z w'+ CA
ea IS a
n W ~�
mN�
uA w c°
0 ' _
6FFFFF FF FF FFFFF ` 0 to
� 00000 000000000 r op
°u w..4 N..4 N.Fi 0
4 a4�itata
am 4O qi '�'�4 a'�a 9O)�
'� 0 000 000000000
o a MMO
�._� I •
4 G il E N w u ry a o. v u a R, r 0
O
m 4 a rn2 > a 0 w�
4 K V ( 0k (r� O
y • 4 - a O Fr n cc n
a • a K �1J _
Fqq. to
' .] ZQDOW .�. ly �L
0 ii Et PH r
p m244K r14 ra F 4FQQ4a 0404
Si •F Y V ta
K y Ni _ •ems
m W A y0 p 1 �. `(_ .
m a a �' yla V�
NEE rt C >
Eo _ mmmmm mmmmmmmmm .. 1__
EXHIBIT B
WELD COUNTY MARTIN BROTHERS PUD LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT #1997-1
PIN PARCEL TOTAL
NAME AND ADDRESS NUMBER NUMBER ASSESSMENT
JOSE LUIS AND TERESA BARRUTIA
17952 CLARA LEE STREET
BRIGHTON, CO 80601 R0073891 147112403022 $ 1,817.42
WILLIAM M. AND KAREN S. BUXTON
4345 ELIZABETH STREET
BRIGHTON, CO 80601 R0224494 147112403006 $ 1,817.42
DAVID B. AND JULIE L. ELLIS
17583 CLARA LEE STREET
BRIGHTON, CO 80601 R0224894 147112403010 $ 1,817.42
GARY D. AND DIANA L. GOCHANOUR
17963 CLARA LEE STREET
BRIGHTON, CO 80601 R0225394 147112403015 $ 1,817.42
PAUL J AND SANDI K HARMON
4225 ELIZABETH STREET
BRIGHTON, CO 80601-9583 R0224394 147112403005 $ 1,817.42
JT CONCRETE ENTERPRISES LTD
PO BOX 1505
BROOMFIELD, CO 80038 R0225594 147112403017 $ 1,817.42
KATHLEEN AND KELLEY A. MARTIN
17544 CLARA LEE STREET
BRIGHTON, CO 80601 R0224694 147112403008 $ 1,817.42
RUBY I. MORTON
1605 S YUKON CT
LAKEWOOD, CO 80232 R0225694 147112403018 $ 1,817.42
DARRELL AND SHARON R. PETTIJOHN
PO BOX 742
BRIGHTON, CO 80601-0742 R0225894 147112403020 $ 1,817.42
JOHN L. AND EARLENE SUSAN PFISTER
9210 VINE STREET
THORNTON, CO 80229 R0224994 147112403011 $ 1,817.42
981344
11111111111111111 HMI HAMMEN11111111 SD0052
2646263 10/12/1998 12:38P Wald County CO
7 of 8 R 0.00 D 0.00 IA Suki Taukamoto
MARTIN BROTHERS PUD ASSESSMENT
PAGE 2
PIN PARCEL TOTAL
NAME AND ADDRESS NUMBER NUMBER ASSESSMENT
SCOTT A. AND WENDY M. ROBERTSON
11859 HARRISON STREET
THORNTON, CO 80233 R0224794 147112403009 $ 1,817.42
DONALD D. AND DIANE S. PLUMB
4366 ELIZABETH STREET
BRIGHTON, CO 80601 R0225494 147112403016 $ 1,817.42
DWIGHT AND LANA STOPPEL
17594 CLARA LEE STREET
BRIGHTON, CO 80601-9579 R0224594 147112403007 $ 1,817.42
BONNIE J. AND RANDOLPH M. TURNBULL
17723 CLARA LEE
BRIGHTON, CO 80601 R0225094 147112403012 $ 1,817.42
TERRY W. AND LESLIE K. WILLIAMS
17883 CLARA LEE
BRIGHTON, CO 80601 R0225294 147112403014 $ 1,817.42
JAMES R. JR. AND ELIZABETH F. WRAY
17636 ARGIE STREET
BRIGHTON, CO 80601 R0224094 147112403002 $ 1,817.42
MICHAEL D. AND ELLEN M. YANKER
17803 CLARA LEE STREET
BRIGHTON, CO 80601 R0225194 147112403013 $ 1,817.42
981344
111111111111111111 111111 III 1111111 11111 III 11111 IIII viii SD0052
2646263 10/12/1998 12:3W Weld County CO
8 of 8 R 0.00 D 0.00 JR Suki Tsukamoto
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the foregoing
Resoulution of Assessment of Cost of Improvements for Weld County Martin Brothers PUD
Local Improvement District No. 1997-1, was placed in the United States mail, first class mail,
postage prepaid, addressed to the following property owners.
JOSE LUIS AND TERESA BARRUTIA SCOTT A. AND WENDY M. ROBERTSON
17952 CLARA LEE STREET 11859 HARRISON STREET
BRIGHTON, CO 80601 THORNTON, CO 80233
WILLIAM M. AND KAREN S. BUXTON DONALD D. AND DIANE S. PLUMB
4345 ELIZABETH STREET 4366 ELIZABETH STREET
BRIGHTON, CO 80601 BRIGHTON, CO 80601
DAVID B. AND JULIE L. ELLIS DWIGHT AND LANA STOPPEL
17583 CLARA LEE STREET 17594 CLARA LEE STREET
BRIGHTON, CO 80601 BRIGHTON, CO 80601-9579
GARY D. AND DIANA L. GOCHANOUR BONNIE J. AND RANDOLPH M.
17963 CLARA LEE STREET TURNBULL
BRIGHTON, CO 80601 17723 CLARA LEE
BRIGHTON, CO 80601
PAUL J AND SANDI K HARMON
4225 ELIZABETH STREET TERRY W. AND LESLIE K. WILLIAMS
BRIGHTON, CO 80601-9583 17883 CLARA LEE
BRIGHTON, CO 80601
JT CONCRETE ENTERPRISES LTD
PO BOX 1505 JAMES R. JR. AND ELIZABETH F. WRAY
BROOMFIELD, CO 80038 17636 ARGIE STREET
BRIGHTON, CO 80601
KATHLEEN AND KELLEY A. MARTIN
17544 CLARA LEE STREET MICHAEL D. AND ELLEN M. YANKER
BRIGHTON, CO 80601 17803 CLARA LEE STREET
BRIGHTON, CO 80601
RUBY I. MORTON
1605 S YUKON CT
LAKEWOOD, CO 80232
DARRELL AND SHARON R. PETTIJOHN
PO BOX 742
BRIGHTON, CO 80601-0742
JOHN L. AND EARLENE SUSAN PFISTER `-7S2//)19.-4,9/?At
_a54 :IL/l
9210 VINE STREET
THORNTON, CO 80229 Deputy Clerk to the Board
res t hes...
CLERK TO THE BOARD
PHONE (970) 356-4000, EXT.4225
FAX: (970) 352-0242
Wil P.O. BOX 758
GREELEY, COLORADO 80632
liRe
COLORADO
October 15, 1998
JOSE LUIS AND TERESA BARRUTIA
17952 CLARA LEE STREET
BRIGHTON, CO 80601
On September 23,1998, the Board of Weld County Commissioners approved the assessment of
costs for Weld County Martin Brothers PUD Local Improvement District No. 1997-1. Pursuant to
the Resolution, your lot or parcel has been assessed $1,817.42. You may pay this amount to the
Weld County Treasurer prior to December 15, 1998. When making payment, please advise the
Treasurer's Office that the payment is for the assessment concerning the Weld County Martin
Brothers PUD Local Improvement District No. 1997-1. If paying by mail, please send your payment
to the following address:
Weld County Treasurer
P.O. Box 458
Greeley, CO 80632
Should you choose not to pay in full by December 15, 1998, you may pay in ten (10) equal annual
installments of principal together with installments of interest on unpaid installments at an interest
rate of 7.75% simple interest per annum. A copy of the amount of installments due is enclosed.
This amount will be billed to you after January 1, 1998, along with your property taxes. Please note
that the interest will accrue in full on January 1 of each year.
If you have questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at
(970) 356-4000, Extension 4218.
Very truly yours,
Donald D. Warden
CLERK TO THE BOARD
BY: Kimberlee Schuett
Deputy Clerk to the Board
WELD COUNTY MARTIN BROTHERS PUD
LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT #1997-1
ACCRUAL BASIS SCHEDULE AS OF THE END OF THE PERIOD
INTEREST RATE IS 7.75%
PERIOD PRINCIPAL PAYMENT INTEREST BALANCE
1999 $ 126.95 $ 267.80 $ 140.85 $ 1,690.47
2000 136.79 267.80 131.01 1,553.68
2001 147.39 267.80 120.41 1,406.29
2002 158.81 267.80 108.99 1,247.48
2003 171.12 267.80 96.68 1,076.36
2004 184.38 267.80 83.42 891.98
2005 198.67 267.80 69.13 693.31
2006 214.07 267.80 53.73 479.24
2007 230.66 267.80 37.14 248.58
2008 248.58 267.84 19.26 0.00
TOTAL $ 1,817.42 $ 2,678.04 $ 860.62 $ 0.00
Note: The last payment of this problem includes a cumulative rounding difference caused by
rounding interest amounts to whole cents in the amortization schedule. The amount of
the rounding difference in the last payment is $0.04.
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Notice of
Hearing Docket#97-54b, was placed in the United States mail, first class mail, postage prepaid,
addressed to the following property owners.
DATED this 31st day of August 1998.
JOSE LUIS AND TERESA BARRUTIA DARRELL AND SHARON R. PETTIJOHN
17952 CLARA LEE STREET PO BOX 742
BRIGHTON, CO 80601 BRIGHTON, CO 80601-0742
WILLIAM M. AND KAREN S. BUXTON JOHN L. AND EARLENE S. PFISTER
4345 ELIZABETH STREET 9210 VINE STREET
BRIGHTON, CO 80601 THORNTON, CO 80229
RICHARD M. AND ELIZABETH A. DONAHUE SCOTT A. AND WENDY M. ROBERTSON
4119 MARTIN 11859 HARRISON STREET
BRIGHTON, CO 80601 THORNTON, CO 80233
JOHN R. DENT, P.C. KENNETH AND SHARON C. SHOEMAKER
332 DENVER AVENUE 4366 ELIZABETH STREET
FORT LUPTON, CO 80621 BRIGHTON, CO 80601
DAVID B. AND JULIE L. ELLIS DWIGHT AND LANA STOPPEL
17583 CLARA LEE STREET 17594 CLARA LEE STREET
BRIGHTON, CO 80601 BRIGHTON, CO 80601-9579
GARY D. AND DIANA L. GOCHANOUR BONNIE J. AND RANDOLPH M. TURNBULL
17963 CLARA LEE STREET 17723 CLARA LEE
BRIGHTON, CO 80601 BRIGHTON, CO 80601
PAUL J. AND SANDI K. HARMON TERRY W. AND LESLIE K. WILLIAMS
4225 ELIZABETH STREET 17883 CLARA LEE
BRIGHTON, CO 80601-9583 BRIGHTON, CO 80601
JT CONCRETE ENTERPRISES LTD JAMES R. JR. AND ELIZABETH F. WRAY
PO BOX 1505 17636 ARGIE STREET
BROOMFIELD, CO 80038 BRIGHTON, CO 80601
KATHLEEN AND KELLEY A. MARTIN MICHAEL D. AND ELLEN M. YANKER
17544 CLARA LEE STREET 17803 CLARA LEE STREET
BRIGHTON, CO 80601 FT LUPTON, CO 80621
RUBY I. MORTON
T
LAKEWOOD,S YUKNCO8 LAKOOD, C 80232
Deputy Clerk to the Board
NOTICE
Docket No. 98-47
OF COMPLETION OF WELD COUNTY MARTIN BROTHERS PUD LOCAL IMPROVEMENT
DISTRICT NO. 1997-1; STATEMENT OF COST; AND PORTION TO BE ASSESSED UPON EACH
LOT
All owners of real estate and property hereinafter described and all persons generally are hereby
notified that the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, has received a Notice
of Completion, Statement of Expenses, and Apportionment regarding the Local Improvement District
within unincorporated Weld County, Colorado, designated as Weld County Martin Brothers PUD
Local Improvement District No. 1997-1, all in accordance with the laws of the State of Colorado.
The property within the Local Improvement District is described as follows:
all or portions of certain roads and streets within Lots 2, 5 through 18,
20 and 22 of the Martin Brothers Planned Unit Development -
Amended Plat, as recorded under Book Number 1228, Reception
Number 02175539, Film Number 1779, File Number 5025 in the
records of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder, all in an area of
unincorporated Weld County generally known as Martin Brothers
Planned Unit Development, Weld County, Colorado.
1. All persons are further notified that the whole cost of the improvements as have been
completed is $44,896.00, which includes the $14,000 pledged to the project by Martin
Brothers, LLC. The total cost to the district is $30,896.00, excluding any costs which have
been assumed by the County in terms of engineering and administrative fees. The costs to
be apportioned to the landowners are the costs of the labor and materials for installation of
hot bituminous pavement and base preparation, which is apportioned to seventeen lots at
the cost of$1,817.42. No portion of the costs will be paid by a district-wide sales tax.
2. Any owners of the affected lots may file a complaint or objection in writing addressed to the
Weld County Board of County Commissioners, 915 10th Street, P.O. Box 758, Greeley,
Colorado 80632, which objection must be filed within twenty (20) days from the publication
date of this notice. Any complaint or objection properly made will be heard and determined
by the Board of County Commissioners before the passage of any resolution assessing the
costs of the improvements.
3. The hearing where such complaints or objections will be heard will be on the 23rd day of
September, 1998, at or about 9:00 a.m., in the First Floor Hearing Room of the Centennial
Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
DATED: August 1, 1998
PUBLISHED: August 19, 1998 in the Platteville Herald
NOTICE 3.The aNeserrenifasaltl Property owners are
Onket tie mite krlpFouemeOM that be paid schedule of~estiimat to �d
OF A PROPOSITION TO In fen (lq equal annual Proposed atewnent.Onb
CREATE A LOCAL Instalments of prnclpa with In the Office of the Clerk to
Affidavit of Publication
IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT IN Installments of Interest on me Board both wetich the
WELD COUNTY,COLORADO, unpaid installments at an approximate amount to be
STATE OF COLORADO
Interest rate of seven and ny
assessed a
TO BE KNOWN AS WELD three-quarterpercent(7.75%) particular lot,tract,a parcel COUNTY MARTIN BROTHERS simpleinter«t per annum. of
PUD LOCAL IMPROVEMENT property may be
County of Weld SS. DISTRICT N0.1997-],FOR THE 4. The assessment without be determined, but further it is
PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTING due and payable per lot istennis2,5 7.78, b sad
I A. Winkler Riesel of said County of Adams being AND INSTALLING STREET demcnnwtiafter t(30)tlnya per lot Ia 2,547 is basetl
duly sworn,say that I am publisher of IMPROVEMENTS TO INCLUDE from and alter the final us i pon the igBrothecost lass
COMPACTION, GRADING, publication of a resolution me Marti Brothers, LLC.
ANDPAVING-TOGETHER WRH assessing the cost of sold contribution divided equally
PLATTEVILLE HERALD ANY NECESSARY improvements, against the among m 18 iota, parcels,
that the same is a weekly newspaper of general real property described
circulation was printed and published in the town of INCIDENTALS. TO CERTAIN merest In Paragraph 2. In the and tracts. IT IS FURTHER
ROADS THEREIN, AND OF ASTATED AS THE INTENT OF THE
PUBLIC HEARING THEREON. eventanyan«asntaganst BOARD OF COUNTY
FORT LUPTON Al owners of red estate boa her property(Is 30) pad COMMISSIONERS THAT,
in said county and state that the notice of and within sad thirty (30) dogs, SHOULD THE COST OF
property hereinafter persons then the whole cost of the INSTALLATION OF HOT
advertisement,o which the annexed y is a we copy has generally, and a persons assessment against such
been published in said weekly newspaper for generally,Board byriounty BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AND
that the Board of Canty property be ion PREPARATION OF BASE
Commissioners of Weld notmorethanten(10)equal, EXCEED THE AMOUNT or
ONE consecutive earweeks: that e the notice every annual Installments of $2,547.78 PER LOT,
was publish— the regular and entire issue of County. Colorado, has principal with interest on the adopted o resolution EXCLUDING THE
EREST ORCOUNT OF
o pub of said of newspaper ice during the period and ass r declaring Its Intent to create unpaid Installments, as PENALTIES. THE COUNTY OF
NY
of publication no insad notice and in the a th spar aforesaid. The first of such WELD WILL ASSUME PAYMENT
P
first o ices improvement t f Installments shall be due and
proper and not in a supplement thereof: that the t within so lOW CO POraea OF THE EXCESS.
publication of said notice was contained in the issue area et Weld County, be determined
as may 6.Upon Completion of said
of said newspaper bearing the date of Colorado a be be deter ined in and by the improvements,or as soon as
as Weld County M«IM assessing resolution and tike the total cost thereof Is
NOVEMBER 12. A.D. 1997 and the Brothers PUD loam remanderorsaidlnstalments dehnnely ascertained. the
Improvement Wstmf Neal be due and payable cost of the total
last publication thereof, in the issue of said No.7107-1,for the papaw succ«Welyonmesonie day improvements shall be
Ineachyeathereafter,urWN
newspaper,bearing date, ofgt11 improvements
is to o the above
edeallYroeach
street ImprOvemNfs to oX1e1s��W by the of Ins above described lots
the 1 2 t h day of NOVEMBER Include compaction, Board q't County and parcels. Notice of such
grading, and paving, COs... UL ithltithey are app0rnonmentshallbegiven
1997. that the said tageNwr with any neeeelay PISA tilt , and a hearing we be held
incidentals.and to assess the 6 AS Mdeftepfy Ms prior to the adoption of a
PLATTEVILLE HERALD cotasadlmprovefepnts as edlnaresotese Matoumy reelunonasseeingauchcost
has been published continuous) and uninterruptedly proposed by petition Of ed•n~~�elMe ales provided by law.
P Y P Y
during the period of at least fifty-two consecutive owes of the properly who OnsetermarsM5Mnts 10 be 7. Not IN man thirty(30)
wiled bear more roan ale- aaNNtlagainsttheproperly caps otter the publication of
weeks next prior to the first issue thereof containing haE«the total proposed within the dshIctosallrn d
said notice or advertisement above referred to: and title r a resolution
that said newspaper was at the time of each of the al In accordance
nicihe tlprlef, not to exceed$45,860.199 authorizing veme said
e
mtalprometcNlsesMraled improvements will be
urpose ons of said notice duly qualified for that a n State Oyer the P IawsdmeStole olCadppp, to be$59,860. with $14,000 considered by meBoad'ol
purpose rnin theme Notices,
of enact entitled.m and 1. All persons are further pledged to the project by County Commissioners. to-
Publications Concerning a legal es Adverand tisements Publishers
andnotifiedMadn Brothels, {IT„; .Tin! wit: December 17, 1997.at
thereof,roftiand and Repeal
Fees of Printers of nprovs that the kind of
and to R tall Acts and Parts Acts in mprove is tfi a improved
ved costesenfiaboran materials meson theratanatperaed
`p`athe seats to be cat olthelaborantlmatetlals meeingtMrealte,Neyepst
Conflicti7, 1921,9h theand Provisions of enis Act" approved and ws: for Installation by contract of Floor Hearing Room of ate
April all amendments thereof, and aearbe particularlypas amended by an act approves!,M rch 30, Clara Lee Street and and basfiumloo«pion. Th t Weld County Centennal
2 Elisabeth Street from Clara and base preparation. The Center, 915 Tenth Street,
d a act spar d ay 1 Leareettomesoumemend Board of County
Greeley.CdOresti
tithe Moran Brothers Planned Commissioners, pursuant to 8. A map,estimate, the
Uaggevelopment Amendetl eCil 30.20-604,Colorado schedule showing the
Plat Revised Statutes, has opprosIil4lt tensed a N
Theknprovementsinclutle preliminarily found and awned and a r«MMens
Publisher shooing, grading, draining, determined that each and and proceedings w deb
and paving the above every clescrlbedlot or parcel and can be seen end
Subscribed and sworn to before me this 12th day odetetedroodswithelnches wwill specifically
ecificee Improvementstfrom
ds eitarnIned by any poisons heNn 0t
aggregate base course.2
of rchaef20-footwlepaving, based on the following facts: onaeennuat«sieusu
NOVEMBER A.D. 997 and 2-foot wide aggregate a. The market value of to In►a. . 7 .
'boatels.. each of the properties wit Not less than thirty(30)days
jsse,f^der eonshuetioa Increase after the publication et Rd
,� i.a�77u,L .'%/�)/7) ee0Wfall 010Lfi0l b. The proposed Notice, a reaaullon
/�/// hardily tom will adapt the authorizing said hast Notary Pu c improvtymamwilladfltode improvements MP be
use; considered by the bad of
c. There will be an County Commissioners. to-
P.O. BOX 125 wg ere did district des a alleviation of fugitive dust, wit: December 17, 1997,at
orpadonsofLofi2,5 through Wending thehealiti hazards 10:00a.m.,oraon adman's
18,20 and 22 of the Mason to the benetmed properties meeting thereafter,in the Port
FT. LUPTON, CO 80621 Brothers Planned Unit and to users of the public Floor Hearing Room of the
Development - Amended roads to be Improved: Weld County Centennial
d. The alleviation of Center, 915 Tenth Street.
Plotarecordea under Book
ber Num 1228, Reception logiere dust will reduce Greeley,Colorado.
NURber 02175539, Film maintenance costs to the 9. All complaints and
dumber 1779, File Number entettproped«andpaving obleetom that ore mode In
R p�i-�ty a 5026ntherecaaamewatl we loosen the maintenance writing concerning the
y \nn l �'(/„ C required for a pubic road; proposed Improvements by
• .•.p` oWNy Clerk antl Recomer, and the owner or owners a
/ .� +.(/C•e and me properly ItlenNlbtl e. The proposed real property to be awrtl
any
'y as Parcel Number kprovements will facilitate realpwill be heartytoberretl«ed
2 147112400008 on the Weld access to each of the by the Board of County
JAMIE i County Ass«ar's Map, properties and thereby Commissioners at the
z described aspect of the SET of Inereasihe convenience of meeting specified above,or
YBARRA ? Section 12 West
of Township 1 North, the use of sold property. atsomea a mmenithereol,
¼ . . .
Range66 W«rofmebin P. Based on thefindings antl before final action shall be
M.,Weld County•Coloratlo, determinations of the Board token.
benngN895B'W 1170'and of County Commismners,itis BOARD OF COUNTY
N027'E950'fromtheSEcorner Intended that all of the costs COMMISSIONERS
C r [or r. of Section l2,thencontinuing of the street Improvements WELD COUNTY,COLORADO
NO 27'E 180',N8958'W 500',SO will be assessed equally DATED: October 15,199]
27'W 360'.589 58'E 250'.NO against all Of the above
27'E 180'58958E 250'to the described lots,parcels,and Published In the Platteville
poinid beginning.Theolstrlot tracts. Herald November 12.1997.
1997 mall ale include the rights-
My Commission expires December 27, of'woy of the County roads
described In Paragraph 1
heron.
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Resolution,
Notice of Hearing, and Certification of Election for Docket#97-54, was placed in the United
States mail, first class mail, postage prepaid, addressed to the following property owners.
DATED this 13th day of November, 1997.
JOSE LUIS AND TERESA BARRUTIA DARRELL AND SHARON R. PETTIJOHN
17952 CLARA LEE STREET PO BOX 742
BRIGHTON, CO 80601 BRIGHTON, CO 80601-0742
WILLIAM M. AND KAREN S. BUXTON JOHN L. AND EARLENE S. PFISTER
4345 ELIZABETH STREET 9210 VINE STREET
BRIGHTON, CO 80601 THORNTON, CO 80229
RICHARD M. AND ELIZABETH A. SCOTT A. AND WENDY M. ROBERTSON
DONAHUE 11859 HARRISON STREET
4119 MARTIN THORNTON, CO 80233
BRIGHTON, CO 80601
KENNETH AND SHARON C. SHOEMAKER
DAVID B. AND JULIE L. ELLIS 4366 ELIZABETH STREET
17583 CLARA LEE STREET BRIGHTON, CO 80601
BRIGHTON, CO 80601
DWIGHT AND LANA STOPPEL
GARY D. AND DIANA L. GOCHANOUR 17594 CLARA LEE STREET
17963 CLARA LEE STREET BRIGHTON, CO 80601-9579
BRIGHTON, CO 80601
BONNIE J. AND RANDOLPH M.
PAUL J. AND SANDI K. HARMON TURNBULL
4225 ELIZABETH STREET 17723 CLARA LEE
BRIGHTON, CO 80601-9583 BRIGHTON, CO 80601
JT CONCRETE ENTERPRISES LTD TERRY W. AND LESLIE K. WILLIAMS
PO BOX 1505 17883 CLARA LEE
BROOMFIELD, CO 80038 BRIGHTON, CO 80601
KATHLEEN AND KELLEY A. MARTIN JAMES R. JR. AND ELIZABETH F. WRAY
17544 CLARA LEE STREET 17636 ARGIE STREET
BRIGHTON, CO 80601 BRIGHTON, CO 80601
RUBY I. MORTON MICHAEL D. AND ELLEN M. YANKER
1605 S YUKON CT 17803 CLARA LEE STREET
LAKEWOOD, CO 80232 FT LUPTON, CO 80621
Deputy Clerk to the Board
NOTICE
Docket No. 97-54
OF A PROPOSITION TO CREATE A LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT IN WELD COUNTY,
COLORADO, TO BE KNOWN AS WELD COUNTY MARTIN BROTHERS PUD LOCAL
IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 1997-1, FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTING AND
INSTALLING STREET IMPROVEMENTS TO INCLUDE COMPACTION, GRADING, AND PAVING,
TOGETHER WITH ANY NECESSARY INCIDENTALS, TO CERTAIN ROADS THEREIN, AND OF
A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON.
All owners of real estate and property hereinafter described and all persons generally, are
hereby notified that the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, has adopted
a resolution declaring its intent to create a local improvement district within an unincorporated area
of Weld County, Colorado, to be designated as Weld County Martin Brothers PUD Local
Improvement District No. 1997-1, for the purpose of constructing and installing street improvements
to include compaction, grading, and paving, together with any necessary incidentals, and to assess
the cost of said improvements as proposed by petition of owners of the property who would bear
more than one-half of the total proposed assessment within the district, all in accordance with the
laws of the State of Colorado.
1. All persons are further notified that the kind of improvements proposed and the streets to
be improved are as follows:
Clara Lee Street and Elizabeth Street from Clara Lee Street to the southern end of
the Martin Brothers Planned Unit Development, Amended Plat
The improvements include shaping, grading, draining, and paving the above
described roads with 4 inches of aggregate base course, 2 inches of 20-foot wide
paving, and 2-foot wide aggregate shoulders..
The major construction quantities consist of 1,010 tons of hot
bituminous pavement and 2,475 tons of aggregate base course.
2. The area to be included within the district includes all or portions of Lots 2, 5 through 18,
20 and 22 of the Martin Brothers Planned Unit Development -Amended Plat, as recorded
under Book Number 1228, Reception Number 02175539, Film Number 1779, File Number
5025 in the records of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder, and the property identified as
Parcel Number 147112400008 on the Weld County Assessor's Map, described as part of
the SEA of Section 12, Township 1 North, Range 66 West of the 6th P. M., Weld County,
Colorado, beginning N89°58'W 1170' and N0°27'E 950' from the SE corner of Section 12,
then continuing N0°27'E 180', N89°58'W 500', S0°27'W 360', S89°58'E 250', N0°27'E 180',
S89°58'E 250' to the point of beginning. The District shall also include the rights-of-way of
the County roads described in Paragraph 1 herein.
3. The assessment for said improvements may be paid in ten (10) equal annual installments
of principal with installments of interest on unpaid installments at an interest rate of seven
and three-quarter percent (7.75%) simple interest per annum.
4. The assessment will be due and payable without demand within thirty (30) days from and
after the final publication of a resolution assessing the cost of said improvements, against
the real property described herein in Paragraph 2. In the event any assessment against
his or her property is not paid within said thirty (30) days, then the whole cost of the
assessment against such property shall be payable in not more than ten (10) equal, annual
installments of principal with interest on the unpaid installments, as aforesaid. The first of
such installments shall be due and payable at such time as may be determined in and by
the assessing resolution and the remainder of said installments shall be due and payable
successively on the same day in each year thereafter, unless otherwise determined by the
Board of County Commissioners, until they are paid in full.
5. As shown by the estimates of the Weld County Engineer, the total cost of the street
improvements to be assessed against the property within the district is estimated not to
exceed $45,860. The total project cost is estimated to be $59,860, with $14,000 pledged
to the project by Martin Brothers, LLC. This represents an estimate of the cost of the labor
and materials for installation by contract of the hot bituminous pavement and base
preparation. The Board of County Commissioners, pursuant to Section 30-20-606,
Colorado Revised Statutes, has preliminarily found and determined that each and every
described lot or parcel will specifically benefit from the proposed improvements based on
the following facts:
a. The market value of each of the properties will increase;
b. The proposed improvements will adapt the property to a more profitable use;
c. There will be an alleviation of fugitive dust, eliminating the health hazards to the
benefitted properties and to users of the public roads to be improved;
d. The alleviation of fugitive dust will reduce maintenance costs to the subject
properties and paving will lessen the maintenance required for a public road; and
e. The proposed improvements will facilitate access to each of the properties and
thereby increase the convenience of the use of said property.
Based on the findings and determinations of the Board of County Commissioners, it is intended that
all of the costs of the street improvements will be assessed equally against all of the above
described lots, parcels, and tracts.
Property owners are specifically referred to the schedule of estimated proposed
assessments on file in the Office of the Clerk to the Board from which the
approximate amount to be assessed against any particular lot, tract, or parcel of
property may be determined, but further it is stated that the estimated cost per lot
is $2,547.78, based upon the Engineer's cost less the Martin Brothers, LLC,
contribution divided equally among the 18 lots, parcels, and tracts. IT IS FURTHER
STATED AS THE INTENT OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
THAT, SHOULD THE COST OF INSTALLATION OF HOT BITUMINOUS
PAVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF BASE EXCEED THE AMOUNT OF
$2,547.78 PER LOT, EXCLUDING INTEREST OR ANY PENALTIES, THE
COUNTY OF WELD WILL ASSUME PAYMENT OF THE EXCESS.
6. Upon completion of said improvements, or as soon as the total cost thereof is definitely
ascertained, the cost of the total improvements shall be apportioned equally to each of the
above described lots and parcels. Notice of such apportionment shall be given and a
hearing will be held prior to the adoption of a resolution assessing such cost, all as provided
by law.
7. Not less than thirty (30) days after the publication of this Notice, a resolution authorizing
said improvements will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners, to-wit:
December 17, 1997, at 10:00 a.m., or at an adjourned meeting thereafter, in the First Floor
Hearing Room of the Weld County Centennial Center, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado.
8. A map, estimate, and schedule showing the approximate amount to be assessed and all
resolutions and proceedings are on file and can be seen and examined by any persons at
any time during business hours on or before the date referred to in Paragraph 7.
9. All complaints and objections that are made in writing concerning the proposed
improvements by the owner or owners of any real property to be assessed will be heard
and considered by the Board of County Commissioners at the meeting specified above, or
at some adjournment thereof, before final action shall be taken.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
DATED: October 15, 1997
PUBLISHED: November 12, 1997, in the Platteville Herald
/ c/c 7
NOTICE
Docket No. 98-47
OF COMPLETION OF WELD COUNTY MARTIN BROTHERS PUD LOCAL IMPROVEMENT
DISTRICT NO. 1997-1; STATEMENT OF COST; AND PORTION TO BE ASSESSED UPON EACH
LOT
All owners of real estate and property hereinafter described and all persons generally are hereby
notified that the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, has received a Notice
of Completion,Statement of Expenses,and Apportionment regarding the Local Improvement District
within unincorporated Weld County, Colorado, designated as Weld County Martin Brothers PUD
Local Improvement District No. 1997-1, all in accordance with the laws of the State of Colorado.
The property within the Local Improvement District is described as follows:
all or portions of certain roads and streets within Lots 2, 5 through 18,
20 and 22 of the Martin Brothers Planned Unit Development -
Amended Plat, as recorded under Book Number 1228, Reception
Number 02175539, Film Number 1779, File Number 5025 in the
records of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder, all in an area of
unincorporated Weld County generally known as Martin Brothers
Planned Unit Development, Weld County, Colorado.
1. All persons are further notified that the whole cost of the improvements as have been
completed is $44,896.00, which includes the $14,000 pledged to the project by Martin
Brothers, LLC. The total cost to the district is $30,896.00, excluding any costs which have
been assumed by the County in terms of engineering and administrative fees. The costs to
be apportioned to the landowners are the costs of the labor and materials for installation of
hot bituminous pavement and base preparation, which is apportioned to seventeen lots at
the cost of$1,817.42. No portion of the costs will be paid by a district-wide sales tax.
2. Any owners of the affected lots may file a complaint or objection in writing addressed to the
Weld County Board of County Commissioners, 915 10th Street, P.O. Box 758, Greeley,
Colorado 80632, which objection must be filed within twenty (20) days from the publication
date of this notice. Any complaint or objection properly made will be heard and determined
by the Board of County Commissioners before the passage of any resolution assessing the
costs of the improvements.
3. The hearing where such complaints or objections will be heard will be on the 23rd day of
September, 1998, at or about 9:00 a.m., in the First Floor Hearing Room of the Centennial
Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
DATED: August 1, 1998
PUBLISHED: August 19, 1998 in the Platteville Herald
Affidavit of Publication
STATE OF COLORADO
County of Weld SS.
I A.Winkler Riesel of said County of Adams being
duly sworn,say that I am publisher of
PLATTEVILLE HERALD NOTICE
that the same is a weekly newspaper of general I. AN persons are further
circulation was printed and published in the town of DeeMs Na 95-47 noeled ghat the whole cost of
the Iwiravements as have
FORT LUPTON OF COMPLETION OF WELD be.nconpet.Cts$44,196.00
in said county and state that the notice of COUNTY MARTIN ssOTIIERB which Includes the 314.000
PUD LOCAL IMPROVEMENT ple1ptl to the project by
advertisement,of which the annexed is a true copy has DISTRICT NO. 1997.1: Molt EtolMrs,lLC.The total
been published in said weekly newspaper for STATEMENT OF COST; AND eattolhedehlcte$30590.00.
PORTION TO BE ASSESSED esabedelg any cosh which
ONE consecutive weeks: that the notice was UPON EACH LOT hove been assumed by the
published in the regular and entire issue of every Coudyi rseuynexeNkp
number of said aper news during the period and time AN owners of red estate and and adlrlenintive fees. The
P property hereinafter cods to be apporhoned to
of publication of end notice and in :heat firstandnotin was thereof: the clon enact and al persons the labor a n are the r
ofblicanen of said noticecontained in the issue OM NM ere d OS rniedCOW* in the labilan of ntl matins for
of said newspaper bearing the date of Col NM Commissioned
M CWend pavement avn hot bilunbee
County, Colo of Web rep tand bee
County, Colorado. has Pr.paratlon, which is
AUGUST 19. A.D. 1998 and the last received a Notice or ansflonedtoaevemeenbn
publication thereof, in the issue of said newspaper, CON11rleNon. Stotenseat et at i e cost of$1,817.42. No
boring date, regarding a jthe Local IWn portion
ta
PParBordst pionOh ecosta willbepakt
sales tat.
the 19th day of AUGUST 199 that Pavement District within
$a aemeneawelit within
2.ArbownersoltheaMONtl
the said Colorado, designated as lots may de a contpdnt Of
Weld County Martin Broilers obledlalilnweepadeaed
PLATTEVILLE HERALD PUD Local Improvement tote Weld County Boards
has been published continuously and uninterruptedly District NO. 1997-1, oil In County Commission 916
during theperiod of at least fifty-two consecutive accordance with the laws of 10Nn Sheet, P.O. Box 758,
Green, Colorado 80632.
weeks next prior a the mint issue thereof andthe Slay of then. fie containing ptoDMtY within the Local which objection must be filed
said notice or newspaper
the eoti referred of to: Improvement District la MOOT twenty(20)days horn
that said ns of said
was at time of each of the me pubNcatlen sate of this
publications purpseiof end notice duly a qualified for that de.Cllbetl as follows: notice. Any complaint of
o rnin the Legal Note of an act entitled. and ad a portions of certdn reads abMeeon prapeny made fill
Act Concerning NotifcePrinterss, Advertisements and Publishers and and meets within Lob 2 S be Mold and determined by
thePublicationsof and the fFall A is Acts thatch I8,20 and 22 of the the nod of County
neoc, and to Repeat all Act and Parts of in Commissioners before the
Conflict 7 with the Provisions of this th approved, Moan Development
- Amended etl nit of any resolution
April 7, 1as and all an ap tsio d, arc and Nat,as cordetl under Boot
particularly an amended by an act 1931. March 30, Number 1228. Reception S mthve rums,costs of the
1923,and act approved May 13, 1931. Number 02175539. Film
Number 1779, File Number 3. The hearing where such
�� ill
J Can yMerk ReU Wald e Mara
or on the 3rd
on i Clerk and areabebe of about vSeptember,ROOam.,
in th,ae Fl e
is er na Weld County
generally known as Marlin Pear Hearing Room of the
Subscribed and sworn to before me this 19th day Brothers Planned Unit CentGreeley,ennial
nter.915 Colorado.
of
10th
Development,Weld County.
Colorado.
AUGUST A.D. 1998
BOARD OF COUNTS
COMMISSIONERS
'\ WELD COUNTY,COLORADO
lc_
/J' C' r.,' J4 , DATED: August 1.1994
Notary Pub ll
(� Published
edpin fie
1998.Platteville
evil
P.O. BOX 125
FT. LUPTON, CO 80621
•
My Commission Expires
December 27,2001
2
0
z
LE 83t\
r F
.,,,1 % n 'o�m n m 6 6 in
It N yy.
''''''''''"'''''''''"'"'7'\ --�+ a lieu ojl'1 0<
lieu Ca
3Ntll 3SI21NfIS
IT" Er- 90 N
a
H 2rr ?
Q a
F
OP
_, � 5. lieu Ga
Z AI W
J
W �� S� w� �l&NltaVW 1 w
:�I' z p l w
ce
F- > �1 w;
�N 7 ..�$ vA Q\ _A o J= v y
k
W ��
q 'IS Ni3etln13
. �v v
Q 0 - ir5ts. 1[ f v A�y A W
H
m o-
ocz ''-'-'' t ,, . . , .. ,\ 4E' ;c::::....\., , \\\ .,' r o
J
oa
�v J
sr 2
lk
IIPA
l t' T i., .fro' '
r�.:
Lt i-t .,{
i
*' rL
zi
t,
c
a _I -, s .
C Y -- * 1....L' rn f', 0 kr-d'
' u e._ - 1t4
K " t r j � f
4 : I r� t
1...i
Z
-1-ii
L+ • ,� Zit
V i ;
N
I T II
"
M
'
i
',
el
(
I
I
r ,ri is
f
�� �N�� I I I lot `_
LAW OFFICE OF
JOHN R. DENT,P.C.
332 Denver Avenue Phone:(303)857-4667
P.O.Box #333 Metro: (303)659-2028
Fort Lupton,CO 80621 Fax: (303) 857-2467
October 14, 1997
Weld County Commissioners
Centennial Building
Greeley, CO 80631
RE: CONTRIBUTION TO SPECIAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, MARTIN BROTHERS, PUD
Dear Commissioners:
In behalf of Martin Brothers, LLC, whom this office represents, I have authorization to
acknowledge that Martin Brothers, LLC pledges to contribute the sum of $14,000.00 to the cost
of paving Clara Lee and Elizabeth Streets within the Martin Brothers, PUD Subdivision, if a
Special Improvement District is formed and approved as provided by law. Martin Brothers, LLC
does presently have funds available to make this contribution and upon final approval of the
formation of the Special Improvement District will tender these funds to Weld County at the
time that the completed roads are accepted by the County.
It would be Martin Brothers, LLC's belief that upon acceptance of the roads by the County
and payment of this contribution, Martin Brothers LLC would have no further liability for road
maintenance to any owner within the Subdivision who is assessed within the Special
Improvement District.
Sinc e �
O , :
ohn R. Dent, Attorney
for Martin Brothers, LLC
cc: Dana Martin
JRD:br
OCT-13-'97 11:14 ID:EASTER OWENS ELEC TEL N0:3034242040 #360 P02
DIANA GOCIIANOUR
17963 CLARA LEE STREET
LOT 15, MARTIN BROTHERS PUD
• BRIGHTON, CO 80601
(303)857-1422
October 10, 1997
Board of County Commissioners
P. O. Box 758
Greeley, Colorado 80632
ATTN: George E.Baxter, Chair
and Other Weld County Commissioners
RE: Martin Brothers PUD Local Improvement District#1997-1
Intent Hearing schedule for 10/15/97 @ 9:00am
Dear George and other County Commissioners,
Thank you for taking the time to read my letter and allowing me the opportunity to write it.
As a registered voter and taxpayer residing in Weld County, I am vet),concerned about the
issue which has come to your attention to form a Local Improvement District for paving
some roads within Martin Brothers POD. I'm a little confused heoause I just received an
information packet containing some State and Local Ballot Issues which contains this
particular issue. Does this mean it's already on the November ballot? After speaking with
Mr. Lee Morrison (County Attorney)a few weeks ago I was under the impression that this
"Intent"heating was the "approval process" of the Commissioners before it actually
became a ballot issue. I'm I incorrect? I would also hie to know who can vote on this
issue. Anyone residing in Weld County?, just the twenty-three property owners within this
• PLnD?, or just the property owners mentioned in the petition(Lots 2, 5-18, 20 and 22, and
parcel #147112400008)?
I am not in favor of this improvement and this letter is to inform you of my reasons why
and to see if there is any way to stop this until we are all better informed. I fed very
pressured here because of the rush to get this on the November ballot by the individuals
who submitted the petition. I was not given proper information or time to prepare for this
so I can fully think about its impact.
0CT-13-'97 11:14 ID:EASTER 0WENS ELEC TEL NO:3034242040 tt380 P03
•
First off, let me give you a briefing of what has come down regarding this issue. The first
some of us even heard of the interest in paved roads was at a neighborhood BBQ around
July 4th. Mr. Dave Ellis went around and talked to some people privately and then handed
out some information on what paving might cost us. (the date of this material was 6/6/97)
Mr. Ellis' actions here were very inappropriate. He should have called an official meeting
with a proper agenda so all 23 property owners within the PUD could gat together and
discuss this matter openly. A meeting where minutes can be taken and documented for
record, but this was not done. He did finally scheduled a meeting at his house on 8/14/97
where all 23 property owners were invited to discuss the matter, but no minutes were taken
that I am aware of. Those who were unable to attend could not be properly informed of
the discussions that took place or any decisions that were made. It apparently was decided
that three property owners were excluded from the plan because their properties do not
access Elizabeth or Clara Lee. Mr. Ellis later sent out a memo on 8/29/97 (which we
received on Sun. 8/30/97)notifying us of another meeting which was scheduled at his
house on Tues. 9/2/97(Mon. 9/1/97 was Labor Day). This memo is attached, and as you
can see, it clearly gives the impression that he was going to have a joint"Letter of Intent"
ready for property owners to sign that were in favor of the proposed plan. This letter was
to contain the plan for paving three roads(Clara Lee, Elizabeth, and Argie). Needless to
say, Mr. Ellis did not have this letter ready for signing(he was actually late to his own
meeting);what went down was a show of hands, who was interested and who was not.
Again, no minutes were taken. He wrote the letter after this meeting, and now I see the
plan has changed to now only pave Clara Lee and Elizabeth. I feel Mr. Ellis and the other
property owners who were in favor of this plan manipulated this situation to suit their
needs, because by not including Argie Street, this allowed them to get the 60%approval
they needed to submit the petition. Tell me how one property owner, who lives on Argie
Street, be included in the petition when the other two are not? And what about the parcel
• number listed in the petition that ac(jacents Elizabeth? They are not part of this PUD.
• How can they be included in this plan when the other property owners that adjacent
Elizabeth are not?
• As you can see from the chain of events that have taken place, Mr. Ellis and the other
property owners favoring this plan had plenty of time to prepare themselves by contacting
the County Engineers to get cost estimates way before June and by educating themselves
on the steps involved in this process, but not even making their intentions known until after
July. I feel that a lot of us were kept in the dark, that lots of planning was done behind
peoples backs and now there's this rush to get it to the ballot this year.
Mr. Ellis'memo also references a $10,000 contribution from Martin Brothers LLC, which
. he states "We do not feel that S10,000 is sufficient". Mr. Ellis has not been retained to
represent any of us to my knowledge, at least not me. What gives him the right to speak
for all of us? And who exactly will Martin Brothers LLC be making this $10,000
contribution to? If this was intended to go towards paving three streets, but the petition
submitted only includes two, is this not denying the property owners on Argie Street?
•
•
•
I feel that this whole matter was handled improperly. I feel we were mislead. The
information given to us was not dear or presented with the intent to understand it. I myself
had several questions and when I voiced my opinions and asked questions, I was told to
"quit interfering"..."let the people decide" so to speak. How can I be interfering in an issue
that concerns me? All I am hying to do is to raise the level of awareness in people and to
see if sonic of them have the same questions I do, and to slow things down a little so that
people can think clearer and then decide. I may not have done this very properly either,
but I have every right to voice my opinions just like everyone else.
The roads out here are not that bad. I drive them every day and have had no problems
with my car(a claim that some people have). I get the impression that what's driving this
whole thing is the question of"liability". These are public roads, but privately maintained.
Some people feel that they can be held responsible if someone gets hurt on the roads
because of their condition. Is this true? We were told that by paving the roads the county
would then take over maintaining them. Can the county then be sued if someone gets hurt
because of the road conditions? If they can't, how can we? Why is Martin Brothers LLC
not responsible for the roads? They were the developers out here. Is there any course of
action we as property owners can take to force them into upgrading the roads with better
road base or recycled asphalt? Recycled asphalt would alleviate the "fugitive dust", would
it not? And what is so "inconvenient" about gravel roads? Everyone moved out here
knowing that there were gravel roads. And what hampers the "facilitation"of travel on
gravel roads?
• Other reasons why I do not want paved roads is because they mean increased speeds and
icy mad conditions. My lot is on the corner of Clara Lee and WCR37. I am concerned
' about accidents occurring here if icy conditions are present, 1)because of the hill to the
south of Clara Lee which hampers clear vision of oncoming traffic on Rd. 37, and 2)the
inability to stop at the corner if someone is traveling to fast. I am also concerned about the
increase in my property taxes. The estimates given to us show the cost increase only for
this improvement. What may not be considered by others is the increase that will come
from the increased value of their homes because of paved roads. I would like to take any
extra money I may have and put it into my home itself, instead of putting it on the roads.
This s a nice community and I enjoy it's peace and quiet. I work in and drive to the city
everyday and I get a relaxing feeling when I hit 176 and Hwy. 85, but this issue has caused
several d1 feelings among property owners out here. Paved roads have their place in the
world but not here. Why do people move out to the country, to a natural environment, and
. then want to change it?
I trust you will take all aspects of this matter into consideration and make the best decision
possible. Thank you again for your time. I do plan on attending the meeting on the 15th,
Sincerely, •
Diana Gochanour ti/1lq (J(Jr
// /9c 7
l
" C1-uf�y, 022 ,Q/a,�' i/, zi.<24/ C'Ytte,a a/2„, L/
/,'CX i'L:I:f ✓� y?, =L!/",U' k.[?.(! GC%Il G!w';' ,c,r�t1 h'_/cd..&t, (l,7 r7/
%UGC/
1,-;110�/ __ // y D7
rC;r;Ut.c�" �f°!C� c.lC i fr .�a"3 (:� ,2 7y i) �LLI/Ju. �/�!✓//
/l( -ue (1,))/(-O4. [.
CLLa'.CJ 2Jr'rv .' . itzej CtYz-2d Ye stye,C lc2s(�
1.7
,(lfl ykl 1:- ' L1 ../.7 Tom( Ctr 4.4vetccia7 -ea UJxf?c t oya.
ILC 1. PALO/ v d /. c's1.,_</ Xt'-c 9Cl, LA_ ZkYC/1
.Qf a �l .t� (-nib f u a .,90u, Yr)(lc( ,�/t1 _,un JAL
hco l-d t .c,l 1irr t Ic.) :K 6; ,Lk ltcCly Ll t/ ,1CZrC✓5,
J l'Ylitt',5 /iriin2 0O/2.t'rrOYS . ( 5 fX r<r'
.G'i.
l
/ (Lib .IA�U..0
7'75
I
! a, ii ,�� �i�_ 5� ,
r � �S/ u,1 L
L'C : Pt &q ; ,43ocC.
li
(it
IDCLERIC TO THE BOARD
CPHONE (970) 356: (970000, EXT.0212
FAX: 352-0242
(970)
P.O. BOX 758
COLORADO GREELEY, COLORADO 80632
October 8, 1997
RE: WELD COUNTY LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
Dear Property Owner:
As property owners, you are probably aware that there are efforts to improve Clara Lee Street, and
Elizabeth Street from Clara Lee Street to the southern end of the Martin Brothers Planned Unit
Development -Amended plat.
This letter is to notify you that an Intent Hearing before the Board of County Commissioners
concerning the Martin Brothers PUD Local Improvement District#1997-1 will be held at 9:00 a.m.
on October 15, 1997, in the First Floor Hearing Room, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 Tenth
Street, Greeley, Colorado. The purpose of this hearing will be to determine if there is an intent to
create the district and to consider the adoption of a preliminary order and preliminary plans and
specifications, which would describe the materials to be used, and the number of installments and
the period of time in which the cost of improvements shall be payable and the property to be
assessed. The preliminary order will also contain the cost estimates and approximate amount to
be assessed on each property. A great deal of this information is now contained in your petition.
You are encouraged to make your feelings known either through your appearance at the meeting,
through a power of attorney to another person so that he may testify on your behalf, or you may
submit a letter, prior to the hearing, to the Board of County Commissioners, P.O. Box 758, Greeley,
Colorado 80632.
Sincerely,
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
7 *
George E. Baxter, Chair
GEB/kas
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Notice of
Hearing, Docket #97-54, was placed in the United States mail, first class mail, postage prepaid,
addressed to the following property owners.
DATED this 8th day of October, 1997.
Jose and Teresa Barrutia John and Earlene Susan Pfister
17952 Clara Lee Street 9210 Vine Street
Brighton, CO 80601 Thornton, CO 80229
William and Karen Buxton Scott and Wendy Robertson
4345 Elizabeth Street 11859 Harrison Street
Brighton, CO 80601 Thornton, CO 80233
Richard and Elizabeth Donahue S. Kenneth and Sharon Shoemaker
4119 Martin 4366 Elizabeth Street
Brighton, CO 80601 Brighton, CO 80601
David and Julie Ellis Dwight and Lana Stoppel
17583 Clara Lee Street 17594 Clara Lee Street
Brighton, CO 80601 Brighton, CO 80601
J. T Concrete Enterprises LTD Bonnie and Randolph Turnbull
P.O. Box 1505 17723 Clara Lee Street
Broomfield, CO 80038 Brighton, CO 80601
Gary and Diana Gochanour Terry and Leslie Williams
17963 Clara Lee Street 17883 Clara Lee Street
Brighton, CO 80601 Brighton, CO 80601
Paul and Sandi Harmon James and Elizabeth Wray
4225 Elizabeth Street 17636 Argie Street
Brighton, CO 80601 Brighton, CO 80601
Kathleen and Kelley Martin Michael and Ellen Yanker
17544 Clara Lee Street 17803 Clara Lee Street
Brighton, CO 80601 Brighton, CO 80601
Ruby Morton
1605 S. Yukon Court /(01� CIOGT
Lakewood, CO 80232 // Deputy Clerk to the Board
Darrell and Sharon Pettijohn
P.O. Box 742
Brighton, CO 80601
10/08/97
MARTIN SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
$59,860 ESTIMATED COST
($14,000)MARTIN CONTRIBUTION
$45,860 IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
$45,860 IMP. DIST. = $2547.78 PER LOT
18 LOTS
$2547.78 AT 7.75% OVER 10 YEARS•
YEAR BALANCE INTEREST PRINCIPLE PAYMENT
1 $2,547.78 $197.45 $254.778 $452.23
2 $2,293.00 $177.71 $254.778 $432.49 -
3 $2,038.22 $157.96 $254.778 $41214
4 $1,783.45 $138.22 $254.778 $393.00
5 $1,528.67 $118.47 $254.778 $373.25
6 $1,273.89 $98.73 $254.778 - $353.50
7 $1,019.11 $78.98 $254.778 $333.76
8 $764.33 $59.24 $254.778 $314.01
9 $509.56 $39.49 $254.778 $294.27
10 $254.78 $19.75 $254.778 $274.52
NOTE: TABLES ARE BASED ON PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATES.
FINAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS WILL BE ESTABLISHED AT THE ASSESSMENT HEARING.
ROTHSUB.DD
\ �
+ � .
Q <
al
w ,
@
@
Cn
? o !
-
rn
I-4
§ W S
\ H 4 c .
/ •
244 n 6 0 a ! 2
� 4 m r-mti CII § � 2 ---- �K a .in
q
Q , 2 ~
/ ° . dZ E- - \ w
@ dl / k
\
. CO
PC
rn
/
R •
m 7;
134
K
R § . \
, 2
§ /
•
--____i 0
0
z
LE N3r1
CW on i;w din
OW
J e \ J
'; Y IA
U :. ♦� \ 3Ntll 3SMICS .
H l \. O
—In'
Z
Q 1=1
* i
o
\� \ Lpi
..a, ix
W
CZ
F— Ca \VARcw\'�\ VA1 1S H13H'ZI13 v
W k
\ \\,\\, om o..
> \'<%:\\ 1\\ I--
0.4
September 23, 1997
Weld County Commissioners
PO Box 758
Greeley CO 80631
Re: Petition and Letter of Intent submitted 9/4/97 by Mr. David Ellis representing the Martin
Brothers PUD Homeowners in reference to a Special Improvement District to pave the roads in
our subdivision.
Dear Commissioners,
We are voters in Weld County, and would like to bring to your attention what we feel is a very
serious concern that your staff should be fully aware of Our intention is not meant in any way to
personally attack the Weld County Commissioners. We are merely asking for your expertise in
clarifying questions on matters suddenly involving us. Information presented to the Homeowners
both written and verbally, has been extremely misleading, intentional or not. We respectfully
request you to take this matter very seriously as it effects 23 voters/homeowners within our
PUD, and possibly other individuals on our streets, for a period of 10 years per household. The
ramifications of these actions will place a financial hardship on ourselves and other individuals
involved. If we lack somewhat in county protocol and or knowledge, please forgive us, we are
only trying to get educated for this matter. This is why we are asking for your help, so that we
may get the correct help or answers to our questions.
We feel that had this issue been handled PROPERLY from the beginning, and that ALL
homeowners were given ALL the information necessary as well as a reasonable amount of time to
research this, we would not be addressing these problems to you at this time. It is extremely clear
that the push to get this thru, no matter at what or who's cost, has clearly driven a wedge
between homeowners and created a hostile attitude towards anyone who opposes the ones in
favor of this issue. Bottom Line, this issue has created hostility that could have been avoided if
handled properly from the onset.
COPY 1 1) We have enclosed a copy of the Covenants that we received upon the closing of our
home. Unless an oversight has been made on our part, no where in this copy do we see where it
states that the homeowners will maintain these roads, nor do we have any legal documentation on
this issue. It is not indicated whether these roads are Public or Private, or any clear and concise
definition or reference to the roads have been made here in any form. If these covenants have been
changed, then we are questioning why we, as the primary homeowners, have not received any
legal copies (addendums), so that we may attach these to our original paperwork. If this issue is
aL' : /L) 60; cci ,q4)
2
not part of the covenants, then where is it stated that it will be privately maintained? Was this
original filing done incorrectly to begin with between Weld County and Martin Brothers? Also
since the public school buses drive on our streets daily, is Weld County somewhat responsible for
maintenance and wear and tear on these roads? We would appreciate a written clarification on this
important matter, and any pertinent documentation.
Copy 2 2) Also enclosed is a copy of Martin Brothers Planned Neighborhood Map layout which
we received, that clearly indicates there are a TOTAL of 23 Martin Brothers PUD Homeowners.
The letter of intent you received, I believe dated 9/4/97, clearly indicates and refers to only 19
Homeowners. We would appreciate confirmation on who had the authority to exclude lots 1, 3, 4,
19, 21 & 23 without a 2/3 rd vote as stated in the covenants since this issue will change the
covenants to some degree. It is our understanding that the covenants a are legal binding contract
and cannot be changed without the consent and proper protocol/vote of 2/3 rd's of the
homeowners in this division. If this is not a PUD issue, then can we legally back out of, and reject
this Special Improvement District?How do we do this properly? Why are all homeowners not
notified by the County of any changes being pursued, that would affect them individually? Is this
proper Due Process to all voters, not knowing what will affect them? If this is a PUD issue, we
are concerned why this letter of intent would even be considered by Weld County for the
November ballot, when all PUD Homeowners have not been notified of the intent, or any other
possibilities concerning this development. If this letter of intent is accepted, then does that clearly
state from Weld County Officials that the covenants and PUD are not legally binding contracts?
We would appreciate some written clarification on this matter, obviously before the November
ballot.
3) It has been brought up at both meetings that when Martin Brothers originally put in Clara
Lee Street, that it was not created properly or in accordance with the Weld County Codes&
Specs. We realize that Martin Brothers are involved in community and county issues, however, if
this is true, then we respectfully request in writing why Martin Brothers has not been held
accountable for this error, and why they have not be forced to correct their initial error at their
own cost. We are concerned why the Homeowners of this subdivision, should pay for their
mistake, if it is indeed their error, and allow this error to stay with us for 10 years or more. If the
Homeowners do pay for this, does this relieve Martin Brothers of their responsibility? We would
appreciate some written clarification on this matter as well as who is/was originally responsible.
As we are not fully up to par on the Weld County Codes and Specs, we request your knowledge
and confirmation regarding this matter.
COPY 3 4) Enclosed is a copy of the first cost summary which was given to the Martin Brothers
PUD Homeowners. We would like to state that we ourselves did not receive a copy at all, we had
to obtain this copy from one of the other neighbors. This memo of the cost summary is dated
6/6/97, and was presented to the homeowners at a block party for everyone in our subdivision, on
Saturday July 5th, 1997. This party was to include all homeowners, and as you can see, the initial
intention presented at this party was to include all streets, including WCRI 0.
3
COPY 4 5) Next enclosed is a copy of the first letter sent to the homeowners, dated 8/4/97
indicating a meeting on 8/14/97. This letter was addressed to ALL Martin Brothers PUD
Homeowners in reference to the issue of paving the roads within our development. Per this letter,
these were our only options! Options of an issue not every homeowner even had working
knowledge of, yet alone any information that this was even an issue all homeowners should
consider. Also to the best of my knowledge, I cannot recall any time set aside for the proper
protocol of voting for a representative for this development to address this situation. We believe
this presentation was not in accordance with any covenant vote or bylaw. Also Mr Drew
Sheltinga was present at this meeting, does this indicate Weld County was aware of and involved
in this issue? If so, why weren't all Homeowners notified in writing?
COPY 5 6) Next enclosed is a copy of the next letter dated 8/29/97 indicating a meeting to be
held on 9/2/97.
I st) We checked with other homeowners and they advised us that they either got this letter on
Friday 8/29/97 or Saturday 8/30/97. We would like you to be aware that we did not receive this
letter until 9/2/97 at 5 p.m., which clearly did not allow us any time to properly prepare for this
meeting. Why only a 2 hour window for just us? We would like to know why the people opposing
this letter, were not given this letter at the same time, or the same consideration as the other
homeowners, thus giving us the same courtesy extended to the folks that agree with the issue.?
2nd) This letter is now addressed to Martin Brothers PUD Homeowners. What happened to ALL
Homeowners? Who had authorization to exclude certain Homeowners?
3rd) Those who opposed this issue were told to call, not show up at their meeting. We believe
this is not the way any voter or homeowner should be treated. Where does the Due Process fit in?
Are our opposing opinions not valid of anybody's time, but our payment for this is still good?It
has also not been clarified that if these taxes are to be added to our home value. Do the folks on
the corner lots, get charged twice for the 2 street upgrades? We request written clarification on
who governs PUD's and what laws and guidelines are to be followed, and any clarification on the
tax issue would be appreciated.
4th) We'd like to know why there is so much difference between the cost summary dated 6/6/97
and this letter? (i.e. example: the cost of Clara Lee went from $62,576.00 to $36,910.00. Where
did these figures come from?Who quoted these figures?What criteria effected such an enormous
difference? Who decided this was valid? Also what happened to the $7500.00 filing and
administrative fees originally quoted? We were told these were needed to apply for the changes.
Is Weld County going to let this issue be recorded for free?Who pays these? Who said they were
not valid anymore?We would like a written clarification on this matter as well.
5th) They indicated they need 60% of the Homeowners approval to get this on the November
ballot. We'd like to know who authorized whoever to not include ALL Homeowners? There are
still by legal definition a TOTAL of 23 Homeowners in this division. Not 19 as referred to, or as
4
indicated, to be burdened with such financial responsibilities. If this is to be a fair vote in
November, than shouldn't all Homeowners be aware of this issue to begin with?
6th) We would like to know who requested these cost breakdowns and who provided these
quotes to them. There is no official names, forms or any valid information as to who or what or
where these quotes came from. There is also no guarantees, exclusions or anything. Just the letter.
We would also like to know does Weld County determine that a road base HAS to be redone
every 5-6 years? Is this standard or just fictitious?
7th) It is indicated Martin Brothers would contribute $10,000.00. Where is this in writing? And
why would Martin Brothers even consider and or agree to this offer? Also, we'd like some legal
clarification on this matter. Who authorized David Ellis to even consider, yet alone accept such an
offer from Martin Brothers? Since he has not been formally retained to represent the
Homeowners, is his acceptance of these monies legal? Does he have the legal authority to
negotiate with the Martin Brothers on the homeowners behalf?
COPY 6 7) Next is a copy of the breakdown of the Road Grader Use& Maintenance we received
from other neighbors. We personally did not receive a copy of this until we brought it up at the
9/2/97 meeting, and then was hastily given a copy to look at.
1st) We'd like to know who put these figures together, where did these amounts come from and
from who quoted?
2nd) At the meeting dated 8/14/97, John Dent, Legal representation for Martin Brothers attended
this meeting. He verbally committed Martin Brothers to give us the road grader. He said"We
could have it if we wanted it". Where is it? Where is the paperwork? We would need this
information and VIN #to be able to properly obtain estimates for operating expenses. These are
fair, reasonable and necessary items needed for a valid quote. We would also need this
information, so that if we were able to sell this grader outright, if everyone agreed, we could put
this money towards cutting the cost of paving these roads. We do not believe these are unfair
questions, or concerns.
3rd) This memo also addresses Insurance on this road grader. We would like to know who ran
this thru THEIR company, and WHO the company is, and WHO the representative of the
company is? I'd like to see an official quote from this insurance company on company letterhead
signed by an official of this company making this quote valid and reasonable. I'd like to know
what VIN# and information the company was given to base their quote on.
4th) Who was called for a Hire Out Quote? Who called for the quote? Who came up with 6
gradings a year?We were told Lochbuie was used for comparison, and since we do not have the
traffic volume that Lochbuie has, we do not believe this would be a fair comparison . Again, who
determined that the road base needs replacing every 5-6 years. Where is the company letterhead
and signature that belongs to this, to validate this quote?
5
5th) Also it does not indicate who would handle the escrow account of$4000.00 for repairs per
year. It is our understanding there has been no official Homeowners Association created, and who
it would exist of as far as executive officers or directors. Who governs the Homeowners
Association? Who has decided to handle the money for the road grader escrow, or even more the
Homeowners Association? We were not aware it existed legally. It is still unclear as to what
happened to the $300.00 Martin Brothers accepted from the original homeowners for the
Association Fee. Why are they holding it? Does Martin Brothers really have this cash? We would
like to see some official documentation as well as written clarification on this as well.
COPY 7 8) Also enclosed is a copy of a letter one Homeowner addressed to all Homeowners in
favor of pushing this issue thru, that clearly indicates that there were still questions that have not
been addressed or reasonably answered. Although some verses may have not been presented in
clear and concise format, the questions still remain and are valid. Copies of two unsigned replies,
are attached as well. It should be clear that the replies to this individual are hostile, with a
childlike mentality reply, and with no attempt made to clear up the initial questions, as well as not
one single signature to back this up. Are these reply's registered ADULT voters? It also shows
the clear and concise indication to butt out and let the people do what THEY feel is right. We feel
that ALL opinions and questions should be addressed and of value to any issue if fair and
reasonable Due Process is to be given to everyone involved.
We were also recently informed that there has been three meetings regarding this issue. Two on
9/8/97, and one on 9/15/97. Why is Weld County not responsible for informing the voting public
of these meetings? Why are the folks pushing for these meetings, not obligated to inform everyone
involved in this issue, about the meetings with the county? Why does all this SEEM so one sided?
Mabey the county should not assume all voters are totally familiar with the procedures and
protocols of government. Some folks just prefer a quiet existence. Why doesn't Weld County
make sure all voters are included, and informed on protocol. It would certainly demand respect
for all government officials, if all folks were important enough to contact.
As you can see there are many discrepancies involved with this entire issue. The fact that certain
Homeowners are pushing so very hard to have this on the November ballot without giving ALL
23 Martin Brothers PUD Homeowners, and anyone else they involved, a fair and reasonable
Investigative Period of time to determine who is responsible (Public, Private or Martin Brothers)
and all information necessary to be fair and concise, and the opportunity to avoid financial
devastation to anyone impacted. This is why we respectfully request your immediate attention to
this, along with a written reply no later than 10/07/97, to your voting residents in Weld County.
We would like to Challenge the letter of intent submitted 9/4/97 as to the fairness due ALL
Homeowners of Martin Brothers PUD. Weather the homeowners have need to directly access
these roads or not, is irrelevant. It still changes the initial agreements.
We sincerely hope this has not put an unreasonable impact on you, but as you can see, we were
never allowed a fair and reasonable time period to address these problems, so that we could have
had resolution prior to contacting you. We are really appreciative of any help, insight and written
6
clarification you can give us regarding all matters addressed in this letter, so that we may present
it to everyone else affected. Since our intent is not to argue or fight with our neighbors, or the
commissioners, we would appreciate straight forward answers and a reasonable amount of time to
research these matters, then come up with clear and fair answers to these problems that everyone
can benefit and agree upon, and then resubmit this issue next year for consideration by all.
We sincerely appreciate your immediate and prompt attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
James R. Wray Jr,
Elizabeth Wray
•
L1Fe fo,y� d 1;sfr
5 �h 4 u
/20-& :‘ eiOnteeetz.0-72 104247(
� a /nalj 4.011/20 o_ Pub
79q-7-/
f'7y ce,nd zro Long-e i 41-ce
i >ice Ma it dczyteae. Fein.
it lot ccrfrelat ho 71-0
Th �cd `r'� ��98
n a Di m
1-`}` - ' c C hcGL, , eta. -qua/di
N# j :J' Dal) 4Lnd �i�,e � �lr
�� thAgtyac —
�� �I
t IR ; MARY ANN E'E:UERSTEIN CLERK• L -e0/c/O- (1_,./1 I}ECUHL WELD CO; �
M "��V' 'ft's;�Y h�a 4f
t DECLARATION OF COVENANTS,FORNDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS 1,16.12 i
i ,p t Ua
, �;S: � ;'�ti MARTIN BROTHERS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ?
1, rt ,4
:if tE THAT WHEREAS, Martin Brothers, a Partnership, hereinafter ...,..t•:`y ;(1
} referred to as "the Declarant" is the owner of that certain , ” ;t:.% %. y".(1'
` tai. °�ti' parcel of real property located in Weld County, Colorado, known , 'y
� � as MARTIN BROTHERS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, and being hero- ' ' it r..` fps
',i,'i M1}',,[•;.� ;, inafter referred to as "the property", and Lt , A , Lim
Fk p 't ,f. L 4`' 1
u-,
�� � '
Ai �F�1E�gy WHEREAS, Declarant desires to create and maintain said + , �t�! !real property as a quality residential district; �,74i, ,
,, r r,
� , WHEREAS, Declarant desires good neighborhood appearance, .. 4 F.'J,+ it,�yy
a 3 `? peace and quietness, all of which is of value and which can ,4.'i ;. �'
1'> 444
y} + only be enjoyed if all owners refuse to do, or refuse to permit •F-y ' ` }e'l'L`j4
F certain acts relating to the use of said property. Therefore, c �' Chfhi
all owners of the aforesaid ;;;""" t4`I
r property, l themselves, their ;t�' � � 'r d `T,y�
i heirs, successors, assigns and personal representatives, do hereby c`.1" ' 'i?
. .i.. ' agree to comply with all the covenants herein set forth, during ,..4t ,F.'", ' ?f
the period of these covenants: ' Noncompliance by any owner will � �}4K jet:4• j , be cause for refusal of building permit or such owner will be rite ti
a . i subject to a decree of specific performance and payment of "
k
h' y attorney fees and costs of any legal action necessary to enforce yr "
rt . these covenants.
t • 4 i� IAA.
'R f 1?'gin I. Definitions .0,„ 11, p.%
p 'N y' I1 i.e l[ jft!
4 r4� k3'j� l Section A. "Owner" shall mean and refer to the record ;/i, i'?I r .' pp;
, " 7≥rIT owners, whether one or more persons or entities of a fee simple I '
r�
tt+ E title to any Lot which is part of the Property, including con- )?' 3� ry
,' a .E�,^j� tract sellers or owners but excluding those having such interest 4 +
'�4�; merely as security for the performance of an obligation. ,
"a'!"
•�t{y Section B. "Property" shall mean and refer to that certain 'i '� ` :
Ltl
real proert may hereinbefore
such additions thereto
as hreiafter be brouht within the i;
covenIA
ants. g jurisdiction of these ' `
„:5t1i Section C. "Lot" shall mean and refer to any plot of land r {';�^ v 'k
y
v� Yrr��{, shown on any recorded subdivision map of the Property.
' � Y•y.� Section D. "Committee" shall mean and refer to the Ar- � ^`r•},
chitectural Control Committee, hereinafter further defined and
*7�j7;i.: f• organized. �i, " i
,p !�� II. Protective Covenants, Building Restrictions and Architectural ill ei
Vii'` t •E�,u• q
Y +,� 'ir Control Committee '/ � �.
I'', 1. Land Use. No Lot shall be used except for single-family 11 `f ` i"
ITV ZS? 1
residential purposes. No building shall be erected, altered, „ ; �' ig
Fl residential placed or permitted to remain on any Lot other than one detached y x ' ?
single-family dwelling and private garage, attached or detached, tb�S,Srr.
; and customary utility buildings related to residential use. al4 �' �,�i Hl•f
. '`e ' r,'. i 2. Building Size. We agree not to build and not to permit £ , h
"1 tn or employ others to build homes on our property with less than
�S� rf e- 1,000 square feet of first floor area if without a basement ,:
4F t(° and, if with a basement or a two-story, the home must have no La y
N. 4 Lii less than 800 square feet of first floor area. r ,' rt 1
E 3. Basement Homes. No person or persons shall live in, a}y 4, 4
?{{ee,E� d ;b§ ( or permit others to live in, basement homes erected on the pro- ?IA
*�, � i
Il`rinl�'f�t�'?k5''. perty. Basement homes shall mean dwellings wherein only the .v; � • 444
ti 4'" J.". basements are ready for occupancy and the first floor area is ,.
1t ` ,r not complete or ready for occupancy. t' r�y ,M1
tl.
•t . W
4. Mobile Homes, Trailers. It will not be allowed to
park house trailers, mobile homes, including double wide mobile i ✓'� i,
;
homes, on said property or to use trailers for dwelling pur-
poses
i f i Cp i poses file parked on said property. � ?i {r9, ...„.
µrqPIXW ' '�" ", i �
it
I • Fr +, i UG 25 1987 yi' tl ';• ,
E Jk
' , . fly 4 1w � x}'Mc GF ? 1 ' ' ' i f rY a 1'r.' lr' '•y, , p j fo y ' -
�,1 ,fit nlq 4 E tYy �' .Iy n8C + 1 f " � �l { rca1 , 1 1
Y ';� 1!�j .ojiv4 t t
Y�"s` rr.rr•,a
"�' �� i
Vd
t Uin i i(,�1' 14� $ A1tf t t
•e. iN' - 5. Locations of Improvements. Noperson or } v`t 7'seFh�"�ti")!, , E � 4 Persons shall jA ..4,LL&
1 build nearer than sixty (60) feet from the cantor of the road 4)
� F{ yf. 4t� or the rear of the property, or nearer than forty (40) feet j y''3
c � t of the aide property lines. a ! y*t7,
t ' 6. Neighborhood Appearance - Materials - Permitted Uses. ���� r�)4 s
! S !1'f i• No noxious or offensive activity shall be carried on upon any t'^"it l t' i.t.
! A iy }�ti• Lot, nor may anything be done which may be or may become a YL.1Yt�i•,±r ,
nuisance or annoyance to the neighborhood. No Lot shall be used 1 ! r
ply ' y' for dumping ground for trash, rubbish, or other waste, nor as 4j,; (.11at '� 1'�r
` my . n parking or storage area for vehicles or materials of any kind, 4' ' f` R
` ! other than personally owned automobiles of the owner, and except
!?tii!:1Ytre! `l'�
•l�lritiyR_° j for a reasonable term while a structure on said premises is under k�iVj1 r�t5-.'�
"�"' 4 ''' construction. All a1 jl'av'�1y8�
u property and promisee shall be kept in a clean b sl t` rt
and sanitary condition at all times. No unsightly materials or 4aSr. `�
tt uty ` any used car parts, used machinery parts, or used lumber and 'i„4 fr
Ef �t,.. other unsightly materials shall be allowed on said property �i4Pj`SEf'Nfjy'c
within sight of the street. No inoperable automobiles or R , �,'r, $! S
machinery shall be parked for a period of more than 30 days 1r . .{', .i,
'a t t and no unsightly machinery or•vehicles shall be parked on the it. .Y ! e�
{ a" 1 ) land which will detract from the beauty of the area as seen 'b x(v' 'y.lY1, :
from the front yard! end the front streets. Cars and pickup ���r1r{.Jt!±i , Y't
trucks in running order are not to be considered unsightly. ) ,) 2a
! �. No buildings, additions, or fences made out of used materials ,^' ,:4#�,ra' x' }
�^1 ? tS� shall be allowed unless used materials are immediately painted rcr` T�•'
a6` or covered within 30 days. Thera are to be no buildings con- 'f h ;er ,c :
" � strutted with tar a ,r.Frr t y .y� paper roofing or rolled roofing. There is to 1 tc /
be no building constructed of metal unless it has baked on „,,,,,e .., „0„,,,,,is y ,
11t.t'{.•rijf colored finish. t;;4 1
k� fC'. . .fit A ' .
i , 7. Work Uncompleted - Temporary Structures. No temporary P''' ' ty'' y'
3 �; structure may be started on the property unless completed within {e v, ." ,2s�' `
< u`ii one year from the date construction is started. No structures ''� l� s7 `kj°
,d,oe,j i of a temporary character, trailer, basement, tent, shack, garage, ' �.i'r , S r ''
7i barn or other outbuilding shall be used on any Lot at any time c,; ttics� 4
c, [tt ,}`1,. as a residence either temporarily or permanently. 7" pppy,,, 't
h tikt.t � a
, •� Yy . S. Junk Yards. No lot or any part of the l property shall ,o.,'
6EY` r4 be used for used car lots, car sales or storage, wrecking business rr, !+ y" i i,,
or junk yards. Cm n,�y"Y'Ix� e�
t �rrA'' { 9. Feed Lots. No part of the property shall be used for ' �
p'{ j �. feed lots. 4.10#0,. I.:11'.-°'p �
rrjl,a '��,jya•ri t �t{ y*1.'IMI 'N
T'� . 10. Animals. There shall not be allowed more, than four 1 c 'f P,'t+i. 'k4 '' 5:
ideirl
xltly 1:�3 (4) animals per acres on said property, dogs included, except , , ''.. o3', ``�t•
. c;• as stated below, except hogs which will have a limit of two t �,,5'' N,)r�+.
(2) per lot or combination of lots comprising a building site. ,,.x 4,
�?
' '„ I{!'+ Except for laws governing the area, there will be no limit on W
'� 1 g the number of chickens and rabbits, or on animals under eight re a yj.Qt• . weeks old, or on animals, or business enterprises or hobbies
which in no way create unhealthy or unpleasant conditions for ' h Mthe neighbors or which in no way damage the neighbors' lawns, ,' r. li • 'ft
1 ' `&i or which do not detract from the peace and quietness of the st'
' V(5 area. A building or shelter will be provided for all grazing h ,,≥LS
! !;-< or nongrazing animals unless kept within the home. re
. re' .lih
)i ��'� d 11. Barking Dogs. Except for dogs which bark only in the �' � ',qe .
4r-�Ty'F ;� presence of strangers, intruders, or trespassers, no barking 46 1p Fr ,7g !
�.3 .. dogs shall be allowed on said property. Dogs which bark longer i,'l; {4 yj
4) c r ' than ten minutes, continuously, without any of the above reasons, , it4 L e'i dl,
�,Ati{, rtt,7 1. shall be considered undesirable. 'G=4� .', t�j1 it
to 1�j 12. Trespassing. No children. or any animals or birds, t1 ?:, .Alt
/1
. such as pigeons, owned by us or under our control, shall be c9L I ,y5�!Cn�
allowed to trespass on the land of others in the area, without �+ '*'
(�" .§fir. the express consent of those upon whose land the children or J r atr.34
y , Ir •J
by 9�11 . rgJF animals are trespassing. 1;41q �,,((,i{{,,.�� '6;$
• 4r �fl'. tP C �'t
r •,,. ^� +�,+';�� �aft ` ::ifirrrt, 1i1 y.1fk`11 �`141 ' 1 , ‘.
l ,1 !!
M1 1 f ri , t!kµ'�er� iq
d� l ,y�1j1 , 1 {.a. 1` !xti tr 1 '..i ��', 1 !� �yP as b { vt; 4Y ♦ Yr 1..) 1
t `O "!t°' " r1 , , C$ vl�^, I f1i,'1�ry+`a'�f5 � 4 ',�)tlbi f'yi)� 5 i��h'I hF n. r. 4 'i �i, . : F +
(V r 1. • ,1C 1 (^ r 1 ; 1 )i { 4 r { f0 94 \r YI'yy r5�° f r{it`(;S �r.y -1 1 1, , t `p)) r') J� (j -)
tir.1 ) r ) �, I�! , r '' ) .1 (i {. }' `i, F., , 'i 1 7( �f ; 3� )2' `
11,E r 1 f f i. 1 I r t F �;, i 1 � -t,�v � �1
Ia'� ` fir .) 1 / fir. t, +rrti ! ((._�rar.{, .
t C- t r LODI NAItI ANN FlUERSTEIN CLERK & RECORDER WE[' ^.O, CO s ri u
I � . '. 13. Breeding. No breeding of animals shall be allowed �� P ° t ,
rl " tl , k` on the aforesaid property unless the breeding areas are shielded +oG r 'i?
r , � £ y.,. from the view.of the neighbors. '` "u /•' n 4,
t
�¢(�, i:4,1004 i
p r"j`P :} 14. Health. No unhealthy conditions will be allowed or 14170:01),
+ .,. G� x, Ti.
k hl�j maintained—Z./I.-The property which might spreaddi , bad fP' '
d odors, dust, or harm 'the health of neighbors. For example! lti.
' , I '! dead animals, smelly rotten vegetables, stagnant odorous water, `4'J `�``. j4' i
't.`� ' ,.jF sloppy overcrowded animal pens with wet manure several inches ,ti 4 tF+'''14��1
+:� 9�' deep, remaining on the aforesaid land seven days or more, shall ir , r ��:
be considered in violation of this covenant. On the other hand, k'ei'�,. �,t 9�x+�+,x
animal pens with customary care and cleanliness are to be ac- s( ayy,, `1,tt-`+s
cepted. Y .�r
z
5y�.�'lt;w. 15. Dust. No overgrazing or other use of the land shall {Ls ,j t '
�,vp� !Bl�. be permitted-in such a way as to present a continuous dust storm It' t�L ',p
;•€' '�ai potential. For example, if land is plowed and harrowed without { ' +��,*��r; �?{�.
immediate reseeding or planting or most of the vegetation is " . T'
�, ,.,t�� destroyed by animals or otherwise bared over an area of one-half *' r� 'A
W
till
ft {J acre or more, said area shall be considered a dust storm poten-
tial. �i ,as+::, ,' "tANI,
+ 1.400.
16. Weeds and Wind. No weeds or tumbleweeds or other ob- i k ',
t+F( " noxious vegetation shall be permitted. Papers, trash or rub- ',,ri ` , v ^
+�{'ry1 bish or other obnoxious materials shall not be allowed to blow y*' i(t. �t�'rr t'
over on the neighbors' property. --4...... x "
to r , ,U .
<4 a I� 17. Noise, Hazards and Other Uses. No noisy animals or t/,},•11 ,� +"..
11 y 1 ; birds, or noisy industrial or noisy commercial activities, or 14";..)...1:-...y1-/Ca;x' to
Z' industrial or commercial work which creates obnoxious smog, °i t vy ,
"tt.t bad odors and objectionable noises shall be allowed on the it i 4'i.n•
ayi c:P` property. These covenants, however, are not intended to eliminate e �, <,
t �f y l n
+ F { "t agricultural activity, or other activities that do not damage 9' �r+.Voi e ,
E, k: • the neighbors. It is understood that the zoning will remain i ,;. F , prti
`� agriculture unless modified by a majority of the owners. J°r#II tri`''t ,
1 t s.t , " +, 18. Minerals Extraction. No mining or extraction of miner- 3-'? �.TRR`' t�'iti{ kris
', 9 tt ale shall be permitted on any Lot. 4A.) +i j� '
4"' +, 19. Fences. All fences and structures at the intersections t.' k. m�
Y y'�,.-,"< shall con-IOW-to County regulations to prevent obstruction of {�D, iii f,} I1
'• usual safety sight lines. a01.4;
1 � ,9 .ti
lyr_r 20. Architectural Control. No building shall be erected, +7y,{1-�d'�t�.ltl at. 1
*' 1'gx't�y' placed or altered on any building Lot, nor shall any wall, fence 4Y"`,:t, RFt'>},� '•
' iw;a or other enclosure, be located thereon, until construction plans ,,,ici ry�t;,,,,.1{ ? '
and specifications, including exterior colors for painted and 441V4kgk , l -,
stained surfaces, plot plan and roadways have been submitted to + '1 ;�T''F t4S
` and have been approved by the Control Committee, as to quality .,4 rn.S((ttn„y
}t' 1 �+ of workmanship end materials, harmony of design with surrounding ��,
structures, exterior colors, and location with respect to topo- {
Zs h`tl graphy and grade. ,rail t
21. Membership to Committee. The Architectural Control `col 1
r • Committee is composed of John T. Martin, James I. Martin and d '.z ; ?'"f
QM' Burl Van Buskirk, 604 let Street, Fort Lupton, Colorado 80621. 4 V. ,. 'Y
,a 11t}, 4'. A majority of the Committee may designate a representative to ,+ ,,
idy+ act for it in the event of death or resignation of any number
1 7S'' f�.,N of the Committee, the remaining numbers shall have full authority
°
to designate a successor. Neither the members of the Committee,
"�, t. nor its designated representative shall be entitled to any com-
pensation for services performed pursuant to this covenant. X.4, 48"' a 4;j
Jia �pJII At any time, the then record owners of a majority of the lots41�� 1 r7 m
it. lx k shall have the power through a duly recorded written instru-
ment to change the membership of the Committee or to withdraw wrtt t� ;l,x
from the Committee or restore to it any of its powers or duties.
a . '° �' i, 22. Procedure. The Committee's approval or disapproval as .l. 4 /I'•
�j . ` 'I4 k., ,¢e,v$,11:1.i,.
fY
W" tj
,, .� , 1 -.t. ...1 :ltl, L'' t YYt i,r.y'+j I 's'i l! ,, ° ih" I rq)11:
! �i lr..
, 1T1.; <7$ .;�.k f •t vi a,d't 9 i£lt 4i '' 1��' r .7 r �'F �p5�.1�,.:i{t4 nl�i s .
A
“I-D' t I.:.” 1 1802 i Y ANN FEUEKSTEIN CLERK R RECORDER D CO, CO
de ' *1.4, :j.,,414
qI.
¢,' ! ` • required in these covenants shall bo in writing or indicated ' 3.r,
'11 Ir/ r3 ?. on the builder's set of plans and specifications. In the
J���+y. „k event the Committee or its designated representative fails to .'
mfrA5t ,j~j. approve or disapprove within thirty (30) days after plans and �) r ' ,4 . .
specifications have been submitted to it, or in any event if .1.41f11,1fllitti"
,tl no suit to enjoin the construction has been commenced prior to 'fit
the completion thereof, approval will not be required and the °n 'z l
r'`a'
, a '
q 'y. ; related covenants shall be deemed to have been fully complied , ri�'M
( with. ., t{ 1,4r #
i,le) l
23. Covenants to Run with the Land. These covenants 3 r}iM+L ct Fr "
are to run with the land end shall be binding on all parties 1+, ';5i, ,
and all persons claiming under them until January 1, 1994, at • �R ;'!t'd ,t)
,'�••�y' !t•,�tij' +. which time said covenants shall be automatically extended for 9 'v. )3� %•
successive periods of five (5) years, unless by vote of two- ,•".
thirds (2/3) of the then owners of the Lots it is then agreed er.rl�r! w+ ,,l:.i
to change said covenants in whole or in part. These Protective
Covenants may be modified in whole or in part at any time by a . ' ' i '•'tt _ ' k"! duly written and recorded instrument executed by two-thirds '!' >} r„js ��-'ti
d l (2/3) of the then record owners of the Lots, based on one vote '�kf3i"•JA` "
„ ,, I ;•• for each of the lots in the subdivision. i
J.It!
. Y ' 24. Periods of Enforceability. If the parties hereto, "";' a;O ti`e f or any of them, or their heirs or assigns, shall violate or
I '� i �( attempt to violate any of the covenants herein, it shall be ' !‘u ({ , .b.4 y''
It' lawful for any otherperson or • ' r 1 `�y '.i"
lawful persons owning any real pro-
perty,ert situated in said development or subdivision toprosecute �4�"@i' ' t 1 r
P Y, P ( ('4 f j
any proceedings at law or in equity against the person or per- . )„ '.
j , .q„t sons violating any such covenant, and either to prevent him .1•,Ai: r,
' Pfa�dL ? or them from so doing or to recover damages or other dues for '' l Z�y ,..
such violation. ,S(, 'Yt''r+k 7 +
f n Vif t0;., IY
25, Invalidation. Invalidation of any one of these coven- (c (,s�' ,'
5 �K • x y ants by judgment or court order shall in no wise effect any of r
dC» d the other provisions which shall remain in full force and effect. {nI`tt.",4! a , )L
t r � v• 4 r� lttiO,41',.:4",;
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto set their hands and h +k/ lJ ++i1fr'
seals the day and year hereinafter written. ,';yz• � •ti���,
fie! t' 1S , #L' 4,tf L j'
DATED this AS4 day of (tiL.gAaae , 1987. J y •,gy...q.4 �.
MARTIN BROTHERS, a Partnership i't.' +f,,1t', .
�J1 J n T. Martin ,,iLjif. ^ , t
J es I. Mar n e �` ^ ��
,
•
STATE OF COLORADO ) , m'i1 Y,Tj , ,ti
J){YiK� '?• COUNTY OF WELD ) 't
` ` e4Sdi
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this � t
,,.•• ' day of �n^�^'- "'-+y— , 1987 by John T. Martin and James
f `.T•S•,•.�'••••. ntt4n, Partner`s of MARTIN BROTHERS, a Partnership. 4i •,1t 4 {,, It‘ .� r
j�tr eOLt'?,Wittiess my hand and official seal. e,� {' '•
tR t(( - - r l r
VA PDOL.0.1y Commission expires. C— I-R8 e' ` • !
l Y
/7 t'.
1)(rf i'.,: "'ti...,.,.n.,.,,.•••
U. '6d1 jary i,
h 7`
tart' Pub c ^ 4 ''`'r it j 15
°
»k
a» 'tref,.
>t)i ra�jli4 " r 4?ntyitrf it ,
pkk + 9,. t' t ,
1 , in. N' We �, e 4 ..
(�»�.� r(1�? r�t � S f. i1 ) �( ' Vv. ') t lw, y• F l J �,� TI ,,+,LI ) t :rr, , �
N�ryl . . .� •. x ! ` . l . ,� I1.�, } 3 . � r � \ .r .,;
, •
• MARTIN 1:3R (.) I-1b1-t:-.) t-L /AIVINGLJ SHEET I OF I v
i
- E
p'}-�.'^"'�• E.114 C
I Unplalbd %% I NM_R!
.1,,,.,,.•^' ((N.E. Ca
i (POINT
I Confer Sac.12, NwM 4r I,+Ae lxJ tt -
a iltl�R.6GW. Z 5&04' U ( .07.00' --
58..57'12'1. 589'57'12"E i
372u' ---eo,00.— --+oi.00'i—Ta13 t.... aooO r.•..
1 II ay 11 Ina. i
6�M
II1V:. ,2.53' ., - -- - - -- - I • -
1.941x' __ —. 7,0�11_
1 N-
1. 1 1_.r7rxrr- •�C,l AF2A l.E �REGaT�_ —lrl -- -J — O
tfl
'`I •sl:. .lt� _. -rr n•rs>:acc2 —se5L; q
na+ 1
\l , .,loo IArszr sa•a z+"
t,>x t•l4xx .� r �,
Y.. No o I o
6 O
Y¢ I a, i6.... 22 0 0
7 coon 00 . F 1,:< a$ 19 20 as
I I SON.nun . to I .R a>n Auto CO >_
to:IA
w•, !+n sand. +.+n
ta
i n 21
ji
Iv � l uy�.r« i _ �f. ...1;77M.__.,y � I N 0Go .v' II- PP
t.:11.1.
„:.... r1 1 Unry e N
i4.....+ a1+. � N
. ` l�14 '� —n.lmxvrwr ,40.0o Q (711.2t
z172.•- o Q
LL l e Y - S .I�o ne' 9 P.,u'UoIC EASIER 1 I lLl
I :1� >ea!Jo., y l w.j°.FO:CtE.7
a I-: —N.
AFIGIE -- . _ �.af�-y -_'\
jl TRCG lei,I n^1'.e.r __r .. —L-- i.
II- IOC• `JJ. 6.2.7,. o-S _Y'- -- -O J -�
I II\\ --t.cz l7 tlai']141-IIJIIULL- .. N89 943"W m `�i9 J•... • vn1.o.. ••
\\ jI --wx>r 1 JJO ��500.00' `
1 • I •.. CJ
°H ♦. D e0 z/ t°.ci.c(a+:«�. III t • n o Y D IJO o N� I
\a I - e-•....� I I •n ;10 . on ' fie.....+ q
" I 5 _ 2 'z F 0 s
•
\ n.
i.o I )0 „ s w uio.00'
4 6. �` �. . I O .�:r _.—_—_�� r NB9' 8'46-W ��a, ti
a •\ 1 I o I '�� i 1
.� 53:::air; szlw' 89.58'4 TIC �30 i la 1-Ir 1 ♦ I .3•
O n� 310.00' I
JEE
ar1 t .18250'45' rvp 250,00 0 mg \ , I !
y —� SE.
4 z,••i _ rifl.�'19�'d. .l"G 9.29_— —'iw4 oJ.i-v ic.rai -iw.n w t[u. s�.� Tll
TIN4R 6SW. , ---Ja\\ \`�— ^e `'YVELD CO AD NO. 10 I
I \l \ i 14� I Slku'--( at:an:Y1 Qtl I �I I
\\ g %\ _ _
• ' \ x -'\' a I- ilL I—
•
06/06/97
•
MARTIN SUB •
COST SUMMARY /12 2(rl
ROAD 10 (-/v
SUNRISE LANE $46,031
MARTIN STREET $18 963
ARGIE STREET $28533
ELIZABETH STREET $23,831
CLARA STREET $52,565
• $62,576 I
/J9.%s 1
/. S3 Marcia' $232,499
00 ‘c
MEMORANDUM
) TIN3ATI BRO, 'HERS P130 PRO1�E1 CY MVM
FR M: DAVID&JULIE ELLIS - 857-2193
DATE::11.497 I
Re: Maintenance of Road System within Martin Brothers PUD
A meeting has been scheduled with Drew Shaking County Engineer for Weld County, on
Thursday, August 14th, 1997 at 7.00 p.m. The meeting will be held at our house, 17583 Clara Lee St.
The purpose of the meeting is to discuss the options available to the homeowners situated within
Martin Brothers PUD regarding road maintenance.
At the present time the options in temis of road maintenance seem to be as follows.
I. Private road maintenance, to be funded by all homeowners within Martin Brothers PUD.
2. File a lawsuit against Martin Brothers and/or Martin Brothers L.L.C. requesting a court
ruling as to the issue of road maintenance. (This could cost anywhere between $60,000&
$100,000.)
3. Petition the Weld County Commissioners to form a Special District for the sole purpose of
paving the roadways within Martin Brothers PUD. If approved by Weld County
Commissioners, the formal application for creation of a Special District would be voted on
in the November general election by the homeowners within Martin Brothers PUD. If the
Special District is approved by a majority of the voters, then the roadways within Martin
Brothers PUD would be obligated for a period of 10 years to pay the County for the paving of
the roadways. Once the roads are paved the County accepts all responsibility for further
maintenance and repair.
♦
We sincerely hope that each and every one of you can attend the meeting.
,, 4'3.1W
kt bin 4j'O40
eNr{ � qci% . ' � 5
li
++Alliiii MEMORANDUM
F,
TO: 'Fs TY litt;rietti banters I
FROM: David and Julie Ellis
857-2193
• DATE: , 1ugat 2'4t'''T9J'1 t $
RE: Follow-Up to Meeting on Road Situation
0
In follow-up to the August 14, 1997 meeting, enclosed are copies of two proposed cost
scenarios for paving Clara Leg, Elizabeth and Argie.
The first cost scenario, which totals, $59,280, includes a$10,000 contribution from Martin
Brothers LLC. The second cost scenario, which totals, $42,890, includes a $26,390 contribution
from Martin Brothers LLC. As of this date, Martin Brothers LLC has committed to contributing
$10,000. We do not feel that $10,000 is sufficient. Therefore, we have requested Martin
Brothers LLC to increase its contribution to the $26,390, which amount would cover t
all of the aggregate needed for paving. We have not yet received a response fro
the attorney representing Martin Brothers LLC concerning my counter proposal. However, it is
our hope that we will have a decision concerning this issue by the time of our next meeting,
which will be held on Tuesday, September 2, 1997, at 7:00 p.m. at our house.
If it is the desire of the Martin Brothers PUD property owners to move ahead with paving
the three roads, a majority of 60% of the property owners must sign a joint "Letter of Intent"
acknowledging their approval. The issue will then be placed on the November ballot and will,
once again, be voted on by the Martin Brothers PUD property owners during the general election.
If the issue of paving the three roads is not accepted by 60% of the property owners by
signing a joint "Letter of Intent" by September 4, 1997, we will have to wait another year to
approach this issue with the County.
We need to know of everyone's position on this issue by September 4, 1997.
Accordingly, if you are in favor of paving the roads with either of the enclosed cost scenarios,
please be sure to attend the meeting on September 2, 1997 at my home, or be sure to arrange to
meet with us to sign the joint "Letter of Intent" prior to September 4, 1997. If you are not in
favor of paving the roads, please call us so that we are sure we know which way you are
intending to vote.
We apologiz4 for the late notice of this meeting, however, it has taken this time to gather
together the enclosed cost scenarios and information. We hope to see all of you at the meeting
on Tuesday.
G8/29/97 - 10:21 FAX 970 352 2868
WELD PUBLIC WORK IpJUU4
08/21/97
IS)CATION MARTIN SLB (Ei i7ABETH SI1
GRAVEL $8,980
ASPHALT $9,160
RECONDITIONING - $4.830
SUB TOTAL $22,950
LO ATION: MARTIN SUB Q A A T.) $14,000
GRAVEL $15,140
ASPHALT SLITS!140
RECONDITIONING
SUB TOTAL $36,910
LOCATIO_ N: M_ARTW SUB (ARGI_313 $3,430
GRAVEL $3,190
ASPHALT $3 0
RECONDITIONING
SUB TOTAL $9,420
IQ7AL $69 280
MARTIN.DD
08/29/97 10:21 FAX 970 352 ?R68 WELD PUBLIC WORK lib002 1
i .
r
08/21/97
{ -
MARTIN SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
$69,280 ESTIMATED COST
- $10.000 MARTIN CONTRIBUTION
$5 -WI ROVEMENT DISTRICT
S 59 280 IMP. DIS . = $3120•PER LOT
19 LOTS
\ _ _L
3120-AT 7.75% OVER 10 YEARS
YEAR I BALANCE _ INTEREST PRINCIPLE PAYMENT
1 $3,120.00 $242 - $312 $554
2 52,808.00 $218 $312 $530
3 $2,496.00 $193 $312 $505
4 $2,184.00 $169 $312 _ $481
5 �_ $1,872.00 $145 $312 $457
6 $1,560.00 $121 ._ $312 $433
7 $1,248.00 $97 $312 $409
8 $936.00 $73 $312 $385
9 _ $624.00 $48 $312 $360
10 5312.00 $24 _ $312 $336
NOTE: TABLES ARE BASED ON PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATES.
FINAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS WILL BE ESTABLISHED AT THE ASSESSMENT HEARING.
r
ROTHSUB.DD
c0r1 Cg .
USE OF OUR OWN ROAD GRADER
ROAD BASE EVERY 5-6 YEARS $5,400.00
INS. & LIABILITY (I YEAR) $3,046.00
AVERAGE YEARLY UPKEEP(OIL CHANGES ETC. $1,000.00
ESCROW NEEDED FOR REPAIRS (PER YEAR) $4,000.00
TOTAL NEEDED PER YEAR $13,446.00
DIVIDED BY 19 HOMES $ 707.68
• -
PRICE DOES NOT INCLUDE SPREADING&GRADING
OF NEW ROAD BASE.
HIRE OUT '
ROAD BASE EVERY 5-6 YEARS $5,400.00
ROAD GRADER& OPERATOR(6 GRADINGS)GR $2,400.00
.TOTALM D TIREIR, $7,800.00
DIVIDED BY 19 HOMES $ 410.53
PRICE DOES NOT INCLUDE SPREADING& GRADING
OF NEW ROAD BASE.
ITEMIZED COST BREAKDOWN OF ROADGRADER REPAIRS
HYDRAULICS $5,000- $7,000.00
CLUTCH $2,000- $4,000.00
TRANSMISSION $7,000- $12,000.0
BELTS & HOSES $100.00+EACH
REGULAR YEARLY MAINTANENCE $1,000 00
*NOTE: INSURANCE IS BASED ON A QUALIFIED LICENCED HEAVY EQUIPMENT
OPERATOR.
INSURANCE IS NOT AVAILABLE TO A HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, IT HAS TO
BE THROUGH A CONSTRUCTION COMPANY. FOR INSURANCE QUOTES I RAN IT
THROUGH OUR COMPANY. j,, J
J
%
16 (
TO: Martin Brothers PUD Property Owners
FROM: Diana Gochanour
DATE: September 3, 1997
RE: Last nights meeting regarding our roads
I would just like to throw a word of caution out to you people. If anyone has every dealt
with a governmental agency, you should know that things are going to cost more than what
they are telling us now, I don't care what they say. Factors I see here are:
1. The county guy last night said that you need to be absolutely sure about signing this
letter of intent because to get it to ballot in November cost a lot of money to do. They
need to know that we are serious about this before they spend their time and efforts here.
Well guess what folks, who do you think is going to pay for their expenses? No one but
us! Do you not think that these cost are not going to be in the FINAL COST at the
assessment hearing? By then, its going to be too late and we'll be paying a lot higher tax
assessment then your all thinking(or being shown) right now!
2. What happened to the $7500.00 Administration Fee that was shown on the original
sheets that Dave handed out at the Allensworth BBQ? Tell me where did that go. Is that
included in your figures Dave? The county has to come out and do all their inspections
first and surveying before this paving takes place. Who pays for that? WE DO! This will
also be included in the FINAL COST I assure you. This service is not free! (And just to
remind you, this service showed up for all three roads, that's 7500 x 3 = $22,500.00!!)
3. Another thing, what happened to the $4000.00 that was also shown on the original
estimate for the culdesac at the end of Clara Lee? Do these new figures include that?
4. These new figures are showing at about a $10,020 decrease just for Clara Lee.
Why? What's missing this time that was shown last time?
All I am asking here is that you people take some time to really think about this. I am not
saying that something doesn't need to be done. I agree with you, our roads are in need of
some attention here. All I am saying is that there has to be some other way! The Ellis'
and the Tumbull's views and figures are the only ones being presented right now, and we
are given the impression that this is all there is and that if we don't make a decision now
then we're screwed. Well, why not take the $10,000 that Dave says Martin Bros. LLC is
•
committed to give us and sell the road grader (or have them give us the money for it
instead). We could go out and buy some recycled asphalt and spread it down. We should
be able to get enough to do Clara Lee and Elizabeth. We could hire the guy down the road
that spread ours out to spread it out (for how much?, I don't know yet) or spread it
ourselves or make Martin Bros do it before selling the road grader. This alternative would
cost us only time and a minimal amount of money at this point and also get us through this
winter. Lets see how this stuff performs! You cannot use Lochbuie as an example of the
use of this stuff. We do not have near the traffic that went thru their streets!!
(One more thing, if'we can't get Martin Bros. LLC to bring the roads up to par like they
should have, what makes you think that we'll really see a dime of this $10,000?)
Diana Gochanour,
It appears to me that in your absence of the first meeting you missed a great deal of what was said and the
alternatives we as a group had discussed.One of which was the use of the road grader which was to be given to us.
As you can see by the list that was given out at the last meeting,which by the way was not the Tumbull's idea,it was
the idea of Karen Frarck and others looking for alternatives to paving the road,hoping to cut the cost down.The
Tumbull's merely put the information requested together. You seem to have not heard much of went on at the meeting
last night either.We had discussed using recycled paving materials as another alternative,but you can not grade over
that base when dips and ruts need fixing.The road,has to be graded up and then re-leveled each time.The recycled
paving asphalt will also need reapplied every 4 years or so.
This has already been looked into.And the cost is going to run right at$26,000.00,the same as road base.
I would suggest next time you come to a meeting you might do some research on your own,you seem to
come to the meeting with the intent to criticize everyone else's input but have no good ideas yourself,
everyone is in the same boat,were all looking for a way to cut costs and still have the road in a decent
driving condition. You seem to speak before you think, (in my opinion as well as a few others.)
First you don't want anything to do with the road maintenance, you think Darrel is doing a fine job. Well
you can only grade so much before you have to put something back, which is where we are now, we need
road base put on now,the roads are lower than the ditches. And I believe someone had a good point,how
long is Darrel going to keep grading the road without compensation. (by the way, the mad is worse now
than before he graded it.)
But in your letter you say you know the roads need fixing and we need to look at other alternatives. We
have! It seems to me that you are just looking for a way so you don't have to pay anything out of your
own pocket, pass the buck you might say.
I thing we have all heard enough of your opinion, why not let the people decide without your
interference anymore.
OCT-13-'97 11:16 ID:EASTER OWENS ELEC TEL NO:3034242040 #380 P05
. Ct
MEMORANDUM (Cs.
iv tr
TO: ALL MARTIN BROTHERS PUD PROPERTY OWNERS ,;(:)::,",• j1t°
FROM: DIANA GOCIiANOUR • °/rte yn� (•0 1+1;
AUGUST 10, 1997 1���;\�W
•
•
I'm sure youie all aware of the meeting that Dave Ellis has scheduled on 8114/97 at
7:00pm at his house with County Engineer,Drew Sheltinga. I cannot make this meeting
because of a prior commitment I have for my daughters 9th grade orientation at the High
School, but I would like to voice my opinion on die subject at land concerning the road
maintenance within ow PUT). Mainly because my husband and I haw different ones. He
will be there to represent his opinion, but this is the only way I can represent mine. He
wants paved made. . .I do not .
Some reasons behind my not wanting paved roads are as follows:
1. I moved up here from the city of Thorium, I wanted a place in the county, away
from all the hustle and bustle of the city. To me, the"county"means dirt roads. . . dirt
roads all around. Roads you can tide horses on, 4-wheelers, snowmobiles, or even teach
your kids how to drive on. Roads that have wry little traffic, except for the people who
need to use them. Paved roads means more traffic at higher speeds.
•
2. Help me to understand the mg for paved roads. Yes, our roads are in bad shape, but
why can't we all get together and buy some road base and some recycled asphalt to put
done instead of paving them. We could all help in getting it spread out. I can't understand
why people think we need paved roads in here when there are several"County"roads
around here that art not paved; roads that the school buses trawl on daily during the
school session. In some cases,these county roads are in worse shape then ours.
3. I need more clarification on what exactly is meant my"county maintained". Once the
road is paved, what is there to maintain? It's not like these roads get alot of traffic so I can't
see any damage being done to them for a long, long time. They're not tike a major through
way in the city where thousands of cars travel over it, causing pot-holes. If"county
maintained"means snow removal, then why is that needed. There are several of us in here
that have tractors with blades on them. Could we not use then to remove the snow? Why
pay for this service from the county, because as past years have shown, we haven't had
much snow fall around here. When it does snow it'e usually gone within a day or two. By
the time the county gets out here the snow will be incited awayl l(you know*ell be on the
bottom of the list as far as priority)
OCT-13-'97 11:17 ID:EASTER OWENS ELEC TEL N0:3034242040 #380 P06
PAGE 2
•
4. I don't know what the rest of you are paying for property taxes these days,but mine are
outrageous! When we first moved here they were around$400, then they went to just
under S800, and last year the county raised them to ever S1400. Now they have assessed
the value of my home even higher this year,which means another increase next year. My
taxes are higher out here then they were in the city. According to Mr. Ellis's cost summary
he handed out at the Allensworth's BBQ, the cost for paved roads in here would cost the
23 of us over 510,000! (or 81000/yr over the next 10 years). Now until everyone hears
what Mr. Sheltinga has to say,this is all I have to go on. I can't afford to lay another
S1000 a year on top of my already high property taxes! This issue of road maintenance
concerns the 23 property owners within Martin Brothers PUD only. lam only to assume
at this point that am would cover the costs for this improvement, even though it would
benefit the other property owners along WCR10, Sunrise Lane, and Martin Street. Why
should we pay for the benefit of otters?
1. In regards to option#2 on Mr. Ms memo, I can't see it costing us over$60,000 for a
court ruling on this issue of road maintenance. I think we were all under the impression '
that there was provisions to take care of this via a copy of a Declaration of S>tet& Snow
attlgaStfaiNaLltiamlitallaalilicticsa that I believe we all got a copy of when we
bought the property. Was this declaration ever duly filed and recorded though? I received
another copy of a declaration that was filed back in October 1987, but no where in this
document does it talk about street maintenance. Is this the most current declaration? This
• declaration states that the controlling committee members are John Martin, James Martin
and Burl Van Burlirk, or their designated representative as may be appointed by a majority
• of these committee members in the event of death. Who is the third member now that
' John Martin has died? The declaration Anther states that the record property owners of
the majority of lots within the PUD have the right to change the cotnndtee membership or
their powers through a duly recorded written instrument It goes on to say that these
covenants are to tun with the land until January 1, 1994, but shall automatically renew for
5 year periods unless by vote of 2/3 of the property owners. (unless John Martin filed
another document, I see this one running until January 1, 1999) The declaration further
states that the covenants can be modified by 2/3 majority vote through a duly written and
recorded instrument. Is Mr.Ellis telling us that it will cost over$60,000 to draft, type and
record an instrument that a majority of us develop? I don't think so!! Why pay someone
this kind of money when all we need to do is get together, develop&vote on a system to
cover the cost to maintain our roads and file it Does this cost$60,000!? Doesn't seem
right to me!
OCT-13-'97 11:18 ERSTER OWENS ELEC TEL NO:3034242040 14380 P07
•
•
•
PAGE 3
I am actually in favor of Option#1 on Mr. Ellis's memo. All we need here people is a
plan and sonic people to facilitate it! Yes, it will costs us all some money up front, but not
as much as actually paving the roads. I propose we go buy some gravel(road base)to
cover Clara Lee, Elizabeth, and Angie first. See how that wanks this winter. If the roads
get bad, then go buy some recycled asphalt to go over the top of die road base. We have
this stuffin our drive-way and it gets pretty packed down If everyone would maintain the
portion of the road that adjacents their property on a ntontbb,or even a quarterly basis then
they wouldn't get bad. After the initial expense an this would cost us is a little TIME. This
option would still allow for the tiding of horses,keep the dust down and would also keep
the speeds down from dirt bikes and 4-wheelers as they pass through. If the speeders
continue, then put dips or speed bumps in the road!
Thank you for letting me take this opportunity to express my opinion. I am assured that I
will be kept informed as to what further develops on this matter.
laafw (Schfiditi
Diana Gochanour
17963 Clara Leo
Lot #15
0CT-13-'97 11:18 ID:EASTER 0WENS ELEC TEL NO:3034242040 #380 P08
MEMORANDUjvf y1 •
TO: Martin Brothers PUD Property Owners ` I Ji'
FROM: David and Julie Ellis -r at
-t,:��.
857-2193 _, �Yt Wf"
DATE: August 29, 1997 ✓' -V
RE: Follow-Up to Meeting on Road Situation
In follow-up to the August 14, 1997 meeting, enclosed are copies of two proposed cost
scenarios for paving Clara Lee, Elizabeth and Argie.
The first cost scenario,which totals,$59,280,includes a$10,000 contribution from Martin
Brothers LLC. The second cost scenario, which totals,$42,890, includes a$26,390 contribution
from Martin Brothers LLC. As of this date,Martin Brothers LLC has committed to contributing
$10,000. We do not feel that $10,000 is sufficient. Therefore, we have requested Martin
Brothers LLC to increase its con buhoo`to11►e 526390, which amount would cover the cost of
all of the aggregate needed for paving. We have not yet received a response from John Dent,
the attorney representing Martin Brothers LLC concerning my counter proposal. However, it is
our hope that we will have a decision concerning this issue by the time of our next meeting,
which will be held on Tuesday. September 2, 1997, at 7:00 pan. at our house.
If it is the desire of the Martin Brothers PUD property owners to move ahead with paving
e three roads, a majority of 60% of the property owners must sign a joint "Letter of Intent"
acknowledging their approval. The issue will then be placed on the November ballot and will,
once again,be voted on by the Martin Brothers PUD property owners during the general election.
the
.
If the issue of paving the three roads is not accepted by 60% of the property owners by
signing a joint "Letter of Intent" by September 4, 1997, we will have to wait another year to
approach this issue with the County.
We need to know of everyone's position on this issue by September 4, 1997.
Accordingly, if you are in favor of paving the roads with either of the enclosed cost scenarios,
. please be sure to attend the meeting on September 2, 1997 at my home, or be sure to arrange to
meet with us to sign the joint "Letter of Intent" prior to September 4, 1997. If you are not in
favor of paving the roads, please call us so that we are sure we know which way you are
intending to vote.
We apologize for the late notice of this meeting, however, it has taken this time to gather
together the enclosed cost scenarios and information. We hope to see all of you at the meeting
on Tuesday. ,
0CT-13-'9? 11:19 ID:EASTER 0WENS ELEC TEL NO:3034242040 #380 P09
ir •
-
•
TO: Martin Brothers PUD Property Owners , . �t
FROM: Diana Grochanour �` 7/
time 0�
DATE; September 3, 1997
RE: Last nights meeting regarding our roads
I would just like to throw a word of caution out to you people. If anyone has every dealt
with a governmental agency,you should know that things are going to cost more than what
they are telling us now, I don't care what they say. Factors I see here are:
1. The county guy last night said that you need to be absolutely sure about signing this
letter of intent because to get it to ballot in November cost a lot of money to do. They
need to know that we are serious about this before they spend their time and efforts here.
Well guess what folks, who do you think is going to pay for their expenses? No one but
us! Do you not think that these cost are not going tole in the FINAL COST at the
assessment hearing? By then, its going to be too late and well be paying a lot higher tax
assessment then your all thinking(or being shown)right now!
2. What happened to the $7500.00 Administration Fee that was shown on the original
sheets that Dave handed out at the Allensworth BBQ? Tell me where did that go. Is that
included in your figures Dave? The county has to come out and do all their inspections
first and surveying before this paving takes place. Who pays for that? WE DO! This will
also be included in the FINAL COST I assure you. This service is not free! (And just to
remind you, this service showed up for all three roads, that's 7500 x 3= $22,500.00!!)
3. Another thing, what happened to the$4000.00 that was also shown on the original
estimate for the culdesac at the end of Clara Lee? Do these new figures include that?
4. These new figures are showing at about a S10,020 decrease just for Clara Lee.
Why? What's missing this time that was shown last time?
All I am asking hero is that you people take some time to really think about this. I am not
saying that something doesn't need to be done. I agree with you, our roads are in need of
some attention here. All I am saying is that there has to be some other way! The Ellis'
and the Turnbup's views and figures are the only ones being presented right now, and we
are given the impression that this is all there is and that if we don't make a decision now
then we're screwed. Well, why not take the S10,000 that Dave says Martin Bros. LLC is
committed to give us and sell the road grader(or have them give us the money for it
instead). We could go out and buy some recycled asphalt and spread it down. We should
be able to get enough to do Clara Lee and Elizabeth. We could hire the guy down the road
that spread ours out to spread it out(for how much?, I don't know yet)or spread it
ourselves or make Martin Bros do it before selling the road grader. This alternative would
cost us only time and a minimal amount of money at this point and also get us through this
winter. Lets see how this stuff performs! You cannot use Lochbuie as an example of the
use of this stuff. We do not have near the traffic that went duo their streets!!
• (One more thing, if we can't get Marlin Bros. LIE to bring the roads up to par like they
should have, what makes you think that well really see a dime of this S10,000?)
OCT-13-'97 11:20 ID:EASTER GLENS ELEC TEL NO:3034242040 _tt380 P10rir
Ofanati0etlalleUf, i rifirpt
It appears to me tlat In your absence of the IkBt meeting you teased a weal deal of what was sad and the
allentatves we as a group had discussed.One of which was the use of the road grader whielt was to be given bus.
As you can see by the istthatwas given out at the last meeting,which by the way was not the TumbWPs idea,h was
the idea of Karen Frarlc and others took ng for alternatives to paving the road,hoping b cut the cost down.The
Tumbull's merely put the information requested together. You sewn to have not head nail of went on at the meeting
last night eitlhr.We had discussed using recycled paving metal*as another alternative,but you can not grade over
that base when 4s and ruts need fixing.The read has to be graded up and then re-leveled each dine.The recycled
paving asphat WI also need reapplied every 4 years a so.
This has akeady been looked into.And the cost is going to rum light at$26,000.00,the same as road base.
I would suggest next time you come to a meeting you might do some research on your own,you seem to
come to the meeting with the intent to criticize everyone else's input but have no good ideas yourself,
everyone is in the same boat,were at looking for a way to cut costs and still have the road in a decant
driving condition.You seem to speak bstbre you think,(in my opinion as well as a few others.)
First you don't want anything to do with the road maintenance, you think Darrel is doing a fine job.Well
�j you can only grade so much before you have to put something back,which is where we are now,we need
/ 'ase put on nokthe roads are lower then the ditches.And I believe someone had a good point,how
long is Darrel going to keep grading the road without compensation.(by the way,the road is worse now
than before he graded it.)
But in your letter you say you know the roads need fixing and we need to look at other alternatives.We
hovel It seems to me that you are just looking for a way so you don't have to pay anything out of your
own pocket.pass the buck you night say.
I thing we have all heard enough of your opinion,why not let the people decide without your
interference anymme.
a
(`
�tS O
OCT-13—'97 11:20 ID:EASTER OWENS ELEC TEL NO:3034242040 #380 Pll
, j..:.1; iii:: 1.14a.:I: :.
slt-
,• 7
J ,, tic- 2\...
J \\
ki.. • Nib &i.
—11 t ( 1 i 'ki ? ( ) N ,1
k • -. L, ‘$'' t Nt1/4. 4:.
1/4t \g, •N k. )
k 1 1 } k t kk. , t t i
t \E• ii 13. lAtt.11 , 1
Account I- Twn? I Blk/Lot J Condo? nle?1 Sales?J
N Owner Name/! ,ress
Frr 7711:71
R0225194 YANKER MICHAEL D &ELLEN M - - n
ar
Year District 17803 CLARA LEE ST Legal Description
FT LUPTON CO 80621 I
MB-13 L13 MEND D PLAT %117803 CLARA LEE ST%
1997 0800
Apr Dist St
A III
Parcel Number MHSpace Sequence ------ ----- ------ -- ---
147112403013
, ? r. o. t Acct Type Lagt �- • a r.
It
a
> 'p a ,�. Residential MSV ,,.. .' " ffi ' ;3° • °°
BACode Business Name Map No ^", -�� t w �Sxr
1455 �
Administration Appraisal - - tIIIt' ` �1
irjaki
1 Names 11 Realware r r r g=
2 Situs Address 2 Personal Property 7.r}'3 8 3 , II miss^' _ x
3 Mobile Home 3 Protest ;,. w 1.O8,-;44L` , ,r "' ' ;� CBOE Protest
4 Tract/Section 4 Building Permits
5 Condominiums 5 Value Tracking
6 Block & Lot 6 Oil &Gas Master
7 Book & Page/Sales 7 Railroads
8 Miscellaneous I Current Year Prior Version Go To Imaging
9 Tax Items Prior Year Next Version View Images
10 Pre/Succeed
11 Remarks Next Year Clerk's Doc's F Print Images
12 Tax Sale
13 Special Assessments Update Clear Exit
14_.__... Mines t— I
MASTER
1
2
3
-
TA
4 I
5 1 I I EQUENC VERST Rt VEREND I
Account Owner Name/Eress - Twn? I Blk/Lotj Condo? •I •ile?1 Sales?
R0224094 N ri
WRAY JAMES R JR & ELIZABETH F '--`" a`•' Legal Description
Year District 17636 IE ST
BRIGHTON CO 80601
M8-2 L2 MARTIN BROS PUD -AMENDED
1997 0800 PLAT %17636 ARGIE ST%
Apr Dist St ICI
A
Parcel Number MH Space Sequence -- ------- -- - _— -
147112403002
"PO;It , , D il,i.f11d $t Nan1a T ≥; Pr r e
:. < 3 / -zx '' �;is " F? ?v.e .-,.A ,., ,-
. - Acct Type Lagt 'nee x,„ r rrj#7 Y"'
�; x 4416.4 is i. a 1 e'0141
ail® ... e 9 Residential
.v.i ,/,
1� q
BACode Business Name 'Map No pl
..... ra +•..' `'S"°en' §' s
1455 s � o f. t ,'y #da
Administration Appraisal
1 Names 1 Realware 2 Situs Address 2 Personal Property • n ,�-SI g' ' '
,^ CBOE Protest
3 Mobile Home 3 Protest
Tract/Section :fe}: ��"?
4 4 Building Permits
o•,.p
5 Condominiums 5 Value Tracking
6 Block & Lot 6 Oil & Gas Master :.
7 Book & Page/Sales 7 Railroads I Current Year Prior Version I Go To Imaging
8 Miscellaneous g g
9 Tax Items Prior Year Next Version View Images
10 Pre/Succeed 9
11 Remarks I Next Year Clerk's Doc's Print Images j •
12 Tax Sale
13 Special Assessments , Update Clear Exit
14 Mines I
MASTER 7I'
I
1
- 2 - -
2
LEGALDATA
4
5 -FEQUENC IVERSTARTI VEREND I
Account Owner Name/I ress ® Twn? Blk/Lot Condo? file? Sales?
R0225294 N _
WILLIAMS TERRY W &LESLIE K r1. Legal Description
Year District 17883 CLARA LEE --.-.---- -- _._ _ _
BRIGHTON CO 80601 MB-14 L14 MARTIN BROS PUD -
1997 0800 I AMENDED PLAT %17883 CLARA LEE%
Apr Dist St
A i
Parcel Number MH Space Sequence _--- -- - - ------------ --- - -
147112403014 ^' a �i
fRpj NO '� S.. C . TV I� B: "RA 6
Lin ��4• fir'Acct Type Lagt y„ �t > '
}
° WV r E5 E Residential a rr
BACode Business Name Map No 't �,-"
11455
Administration Appraisal T +� '` 1Tv x
1 Names 1 Realware
2 Situs Address 2 Personal Pro ert n tE hYt
P Y �2 CBOE Protest
3 Mobile Home 3 Protest
4 Tract/Section 4 Building Permits '
5 Condominiums 5 Value Tracking
6 Block & Lot 6 Oil &Gas Master
7 Book & Page/Sales 7 Railroads Current Year Prior Version Go To Imaging
8 Miscellaneous
9 Tax Items I Prior Year Next Version View Images
10 Pre/Succeed
11 Remarks Next Year Clerk's Doc's Print Images
I 12 Tax Sale F
L 13 Special Assessments L Update Clear Exit
I__ 14 Mines
MASTER
I
2
3
q LEGALDATA
5 I EQUENC �/ERSTARTI VEREND 1
Account Owner Name/i Bess Twn? I Bik/Lot Condo?1 'file?I Sales?
N
R0225094 'TURNBULL BONNIE J & RANDOLPH M ' Legal Description Iii
Year District 17723 CLARA LEE --
BRIGHTON CO 80601 MB-12 L12 MARTIN BROS PUD - - 1
1997 0800 AMENDED PLAT
Apr Dist St
A
_,I
Parcel Number MH Space Sequence -- - - - - --_-_--- - ----_--
147112403012
'.3, Dv NgFh fit_ 1 •
e 7 _
!„ r r
at
Y t •
,....„, .„1
_. f � Acct Type Lagt ' 1, e „
BACode Business Name Map No ' ,.,§ m AMY
I 1455 '"' Sa :v tl -. c, .. 1i`
Administration Appraisal r a ah
w;,ix .. 9 ��6e .hk f i a t
1 Names 1 Realware — ' ..
2 Situs Address 2 Personal Property •.,, xa Z' Pry.,.
S } Y Y`Y'i 7.
3 Mobile Home 3 Protest ° a CBOE Protest
4 Tract/Section 4 Building Permits
5 Condominiums 5 Value Tracking
6 Block & Lot 6 Oil &Gas Master
7 Book & Page/Sales 7 Railroads
8 Miscellaneous Current Year Prior Version Ga To Imaging
9 Tax Items Prior Year Next Version View Images ear10 Pre/Succeed
11 Remarks Clerk's Doc's Print Images
12 Tax Sale I,
13 Special Assessments Exit
14 Mines
MASTER
1
3 � l
4 LEGALDATA
r 5 EQUENC VERSTART VERENDI
Account Owner Name,i ress IIIIII'wn? Blk/Lot I Condo? I 'ile?I Sales?J
R0224594 N =_
STOPPEL DWIGHT&LANA '
Legal Description
Year District 17594 CLARA LEE ST
BRIGHTON CO 806019579 MB-7 L7 MARTIN BROS PUD -AMENDED
1997 0800 PLAT
Apr Dist St I
A
I
Parcel Number MH Space Sequence - -- -- _ - __-- -
147112403007
TS11'9aCS G! • Din r+*�a _ 9epti 'T{i _
4).7;olel,: r+.:ati,4 -r„,,,r.,. ......1/2,.. . 1g* VP,
i :tilt444 oerl g• L
LoCati' u� Acct Type Lagt '"'�'
itiFn's" :. _ A
tl :la,' r Residential7.
t e r ;{ .. `"dk e s r
[rr' " 1
BACode Business Name ry # -.
1Map No
1455 s ? 'riae rlL.._.. ... '
Administration Appraisal jr
1 Names 1 Realware '` °�
2 Situs Address 2 Personal Property °1 ^lt"r.L ' Ii1:, Ir [ CBOE Protest
3 Mobile Home 3 Protest pae a e
4 Tract/Section 4 Building Permits
5 Condominiums 5 Value Tracking
6 Block & Lot 6 Oil &Gas Master
7 Book &Page/Sales 7 Railroads
8 Miscellaneous Current Year Prior Version Go To Imaging
9 Tax Items Prior Year Next Version View Images
10 Pre/Succeed
11 Remarks Next Year Clerk's Doc's Print Images
12 Tax Sale
13 Special Assessments Update Clear Exit
14 Mines _---_-__--_-�
MASTER
i
4_ I LEGALDATA
T
5 EQUENC -VERSTARTIVERENDI
Account N Owner Name// .ress ® Twn? I Blk/Lot I Condo? I ;le? sales?
R0225494 - ' . _r.
_
SHOEMAKER S KENNETH & SHARON C "- Legal DQSCfIpYion
Year District 14366 ELIZABETH ST rM8-16 L16 MARTIN BROS PUD
BRIGHTON CO 80601
1997 0800 AMENDED PLAT
Apr Dist St
A
Parcel Number MH Space Sequence ---_--— _-_-- ---- -- -------
147112403016 4 .' TM,' 'At'4 TYRO '!' 7717 ' ,r. €..“' .-,” ST + dL t T"
lathe/ t + ..Acct Type Lagti
r +. ,:
Vy Far o 4 b v " �, ) rIft Residential w,`b, +d + a t jr , �e,o o r
BACode Business Name Map No
ifial +'ril
11455 + �••°�+
R
Administration Appraisal ' r c �' r r + +L +` + I+
1 Names 1 Realware
2 Situs Address 2 Personal Property s + ' 3 aT •"1
-. CBOE Protest
3 Mobile Home 3 Protest f .aj ;,.•f r a
4 Tract/Section 4 Building Permits ""
5 Condominiums 5 Value Tracking
6 Block & Lot 6 Oil &Gas Master r
7 Book & Page/Sales 7 Railroads
8 Miscellaneous Current Prior VersionVersion GoVi To Imaging
11 Remarks
•�
9 Tax Items Prior YearYear Next e Imge
10 Pre/Succeed .
Next Year Clerk's Doc's Printw Imagesa s
12 Tax Sale
13 Special Assessments Update Clear Exit
14 Mines
MASTER
1
2
,
LEGALDATA
4
5 EQUENC NERSTARTIVEREND
Account Owner Twn? I Bik/Lot Condo? I' ile? I Sales?
Name/. ress
R0224794 ROBERTSON SCOTT A & WENDY M °=1ssV' Legal Description
Year District 11859 HARRISON ST
THORNTON CO 80233 MB-9 L9 MARTIN BROS PUD -AMENDED
1997 0800 PLAT
Apr Dist St
A
Parcel Number MH Space Sequence
147112403009
r ? •':iR -.n�+ .1$*, 1,` a ...:�§ ttt r . .
;p Acct Type Lagt F2,1
.7 rry, } �
BACode Business Name Map No - "* ;t ,yyL S'
R $
1455
Administration Appraisal
:‘,7er
� dS t •a 'r sC#I "_
.t„,,„, ,
1 _ .- Names I-1 Realware
2 Situs Address 2 Personal Property 7{` Ir rl�1 't ` CBOE Protest
3 Mobile Home 3 Protest -72.1":".”.1" [,
4 Tract/Section 4 Building Permits
5 Condominiums 5 Value Tracking
6 Block & Lot 6 Oil &Gas Master
7 Book & Page/Sales 7 Railroads
8 Miscellaneous Current Year Prior Version Go To Imaging
9 Tax Items Prior Year Next Version View Images
10 Pre/Succeed
11 Remarks I Next Year Clerk's Doc's Print Images
12 Tax Sale
13 Special Assessments I Update Clear Exit
14 Mines
MASTER
1
2
4 LEGALDA1A
5 1 EQUENC VERSTARTI VEREND '
Account l Owner Name// ress
N ® Twn? Blk/Lot I Condo? I"' ile? Sales?
R0224994 -- --- --- =
PFISTER JOHN L & EARLENE SUSAN Description
ription
Year District TH VINE ST _- 1
THORNTON CO 80229 MB-11 L71 MARTIN BROS -
1997 0800 AMENDED PLAT
i
Apr Dist St I L,
A ` J
Parcel Number MH Space Sequence
147112403011
r o . ,rms A B
Acct Type Lam :o 6`Y'.- r„r _Y *t:If'
r Residential bS-r7r o `n <r r
BACode Business Name Map No -IMMIT,;r45? i ` ^ d 7- -.
1455 L..'1 ,.
Administration Appraisal ��
AI'L. 55)(';;if+Y.'y I 15 t”) a,
1 Names 1 Realware `- `""`� ••"^'^'
2 Situs Address 2 Personal Property a , i $6 'r E . •'t __
3 Mobile Home 3 Protest e
CBOE Protest
4 Tract/Section 4 Building Permits _
5 Condominiums 5 Value Tracking
6 Block & Lot 6 Oil & Gas Master
7 Book &Page/Sales 7 Railroads
8 Miscellaneous Current Year Prior Version Go To Imaging
9 Tax Items Prior Year Next Version View Images
10 Pre/Succeed -
11 Remarks Next Year Clerk's Doc's Print Images
12 Tax Sale
13 Special Assessments Update Clear Exit
14 Mines
MASTER
1
2
4 LEGALDATA
5 EQUENCI`/ERSTART VERENDI
Account Owner Name/' ass ® Twn? I Blk/Lot I Condo?f 'tile?I Sales? I
R0225894 N =_
PETTIJOHN DARRELL & SHARON R ea.
Year District P 0 BOX 742 Legal Description
BRIGHTON CO 80601-0742 I MB-20 L20 MARTIN BROS PUD -
1997 0800 I AMENDED PLAT
Apr Dist St
A
Parcel Number MH Space Sequence -"" --- — _- - - -- - ---- -
147112403020
S3" ei t Di 1. Do__„:„....„,„ „Tr S.ttad a. ,Itiii, Yy:'al rrr-P77-1Eri: ° 41-liniii' 1 r.,,,,,r,-„„,,,„,,,,,.., ,„ , , , , .,,..., ,,.„;,,,„ :,.„ ,. , „ „, . , .„„. ,, ,
„.,,,-,..., i.,,,,.),..,,,,„,.,,,. .. ,,.. ,,,,,,,,,,,./. ,r,_„.„,,,,,_._ e ._, ' ffi..11"..:
L 6a ' e kia tip," ir,Acct Type Lagt ....„„. ,_...,, ' t r:1 y, .�""""°Eis n :'�!., ' , to un ..:M k .ase v, ' 4..a .s�
BACode Business Name Map No ?�' ' '�'
17455
Administration Appraisal s ' 3 I it.3 -F �'itl tit-1,57—
1 Names 1 Realware - _ p 3 ry £"I �.... 6^?eke �'
2 Situs Address Mobile Home
2 Personal Property yeGtl s "�li t o CBOE Protest
3 Protest � $Y ?' "' ' e�
�
4 Tract/Section 4 Building Permits Ear '""� - L& ''
5 Condominiums 5 Value Tracking
6 Block & Lot 6 Oil &Gas Master
7 Book &Page/Sales 7 Railroads
8 Miscellaneous Current Year Prior Version I Go To Imaging
9 Tax Items Prior Year Next Version View Images
10 Pre/Succeed
11 Remarks Next Year Clerk's Doc's Print Images
12 Tax Sale
13 Special Assessments Update Clear Exit
14 Mines
MASTER
1
2
3
4 LEGALDATA
5 i EQUENC IVERSTARTI VEREND
Account Owner Name/° ress _ Twn? I Blk/Lot I Condo? I 'Ale?I Sales?
N _
F10225694t6 Legal Description
MORTON RUBY I &
Year District 1605 S YUKON CT I --
LAKEWOOD CO 80232 MB-18 L18 MARTIN BROS PUD - '..
1997 0800 AMENDED PLAT
Apr Dist St
A
Parcel Number MH Space Sequence
147112403018
$ rx No# $." a „••, Type r e
f u 4
p ...
° iii:.- fi`d'e d'1" .. e
Lo. I Lou°atio. Acct Type Lagt - t
'�. -'4.741.1",,4,77,4,,59F,!:411..
,! • . •... r
°ni,i.i rid sdr
BACode Business Name IMap No 'n v ra �,,�; - _
1455 ° t �_vN 1 '!a-
. A .�' 1 ,41., tad a 4 ! x-
Administration Appraisal :yy„�j roped _
!. i §' b 1IIYS!• "e h`7".'Sh f3-- 8 B°
1 Names 1 Realware
2 Situs Address F 2 Personal Property 1 CBOE Protest
3 Mobile Home 3 Protest '$.•` °
4 Tract/Section 4 Building Permits
5 Condominiums 5 Value Tracking
6 Block & Lot 6 Oil & Gas Master ° °!
7 Book & Page/Sales 7 Railroads
8 Miscellaneous Current Year Prior Version Go To Imaging
Prior
9 Tax Items
10 Pre/Succeed
or Year Next Version View Images
11 Remarks Next Year Clerk's Doc's Print Images
12 Tax Sale
13 Special Assessments Update Clear ExitI
14 Mines
MASTER
1
2
3 4 1 LEGALDATA
5 ' 1 1EQUENC MERSTARTIVEREND
Ili Twn? I BIk/Lot j 1 l Condo? ile? I Sales?
Account Owner Name/f ress -
R0224694 N
MARTIN KATHLEEN A & KELLEY A [17:7'.7,.4::
17544 CLARA LEE ST Legal Description
Year District
BRIGHTON CO 80601 MB-8 L8 MARTIN BROS PUD - AMENDED i
1997 0800 PLAT
Apr Dist St I I
A
Parcel Number MH Space Sequence -- -- _ ---- - - ---
147112403008
,--a Dv ; No#S Str ii Na a si tr _
artt a :0;.%,"%q":" IP iq 1 l �
t3 • �sti @M1lir ' E F; v�6� u �ir 'll� ;:ii:
y • ® • {,41• `4ig i AtaLcct Type Lagt ,s �' ,.n "'
, ,: aaa, . 9 ThaYi.'M a. ;,Residential �e t , i.,...x r ."", r a Ie?'ar
BACode Business Name Ma No 1 --� �` "%1
11455 LW �` TtJe �
.,
Administration Appraisal u ' :ice a '/ '
f 1 Names 1 Realware
2 Situs Address 2 Personal Property e,triPritriri 1 ' ° ?
CBOE Protest
3 Mobile Home 3 Protest c ,„..".:10'.'1
.r
4 Tract/Section 4 Building Permits
5 Condominiums 5 Value Tracking
6 Block & Lot 6 Oil &Gas Master
7 Book & Page/Sales ! 7 Railroads Current Year Prior Version Go To Imaging
8 Miscellaneous
9 Tax Items Prior Year Next Version View Images
10 Pre/Succeed
11 Remarks Next Year Clerk's Doc's Print Images
12 Tax Sale
13 Special Assessments j Update Clear Exit
14 Mines J__
•
MASTER
I
i
4
LEGALDATA
5 IEQUENC VERSTARTI VEREND!I
Account Owner Name/f ess ® Twn? I Blk/Lot I Condo? I le? I Sales? I
N
R0224394 HARMON PAUL J &SANDI K Er-±,.,_,1!,, ,t Legal Description
Year District 4225 ELIZABETH ST ---- _ -
BRIGHTON CO 80601-9583 'MB-5 L5 MARTIN BROS PUD AMENDED 1
1997 0800 I
PLAT
Apr Dist St
A
Parcel Number MH Space Sequence --
147112403005
.. t,..,„ .„..,,..a, „,,,,„..„,,.e 5, Name .. ® o
"' 4 '117/1.. P < Acct Type Lagt i u: f ; " - i.4.",' ..
t ra 6 E y xatnt i y y Ait r r
BACode Business Name Map No [nx " ,ii rx1
1455 i
Administration Appraisal : �-"� �
' Ilitilll7r a[aF `
--e-
1 Names --. _.- 1 Realwalware �g= ! � ` r "..4a..r�
1 �.
2 Situs Address 2 Personal Property >' +ta„' '''fli ?' + CBOE Protest
3 Mobile Home 3 Protest
4 Tract/Section 4 Building Permits " .?t�s' x."` i`:�
5 Condominiums 5 Value Tracking
6 Block & Lot 6 Oil&Gas Master
7 Book & Page/Sales 7 Railroads Current Year Prior Version Go To Imaging
8 Miscellaneous _
9 Tax Items Prior Year Next Version i View Images
10 Pre/Succeed -
11 Remarks Next Year Clerk's Doc's Print Images
12 Tax Sale -
13 Special Assessments I Update Clear Exit
14 Mines
MASTER
1
2
3
4 LEGALDATA
5 EQUENC MERSTART VEREND
Account Owner Nameh ress Twn? I 81k/Lot I Condo? I' iile?I Sales?
N
R0225394 GOCHANOUR GARY D &DIANA I i Legal Description IMP
Year District 17963 CLARA LEE ST
_.
BRIGHTON CO 80601 MB-15 L15 MARTIN BROS PUD UD-
1997 0800 AMENDED PLAT
Apr Dist St ,
A
Parcel Number MH Space Sequence - -_---- ----
147112403015
u= i s s . s'1 A'c ati S °�cr ,i�,. 1 y ir i+k
Corm. 3 . .1 e 1#f1 (p`1" Acct Type Lagt7,41,17----"i7917,
a + 3a ,1 '+ ,7
s > k" p Residential .� 'r � r tielfl
BACode vBusiness Name Map No il'? y Mr'''' 'm (-,-,,TIT-
11455 '� otie- ? S; t4' l%YA
s�
Administration Appraisal d ° ),ot `` 1 ° 1 Y
1 Names ' 1 Realware L °?° °•�
2 Situs Address 2 Personal Property '''' },I°'VP$_ '" CBOE Protest
3 Mobile Home 3 Protest
4 Tract/Section 4 Building Permits �� '" e' E e. e
5 Condominiums 5 Value Tracking
6 Block & Lot I
6 Oil & Gas Master
7 Book & Page/Sales 7 Railroads Current Year Prior Version Go To Imaging
9 Tax Items Prior Year Next Version View Images
10 Pre/Succeed
11 Remarks Next Year Clerk's Doc's Print Images
12 Tax Sale
13 Special Assessments Update Clear Exit
14 Mines
MASTER
1I
2
3 -
4 LEGALDATA
5 I EQUENC ERSTARTIVEREND
Account Owner Name// ress
N NM rwn? Bik/Lot Condo? L ale? Sales?
R0225594 J T CONCRETE ENTERPRISES LTD
Year District P 0 BOX 1505 Legal Description -
BROOMFIELD CO 80038 MB-17 L17 MARTIN BROS PUD -
1997 0800 AMENDED PLAT
Apr Dist St
A L I
Parcel Number MH Space Sequence -- ------- -- ------- -----
147112403017
SP1k
S r e:iier a,F 1 ,l i # �. . _ "5'a sr
4s1 Acct Type Lagt -., -e' 'S' ,ey
ii - ,' [[-41 ,k.c, ,E[. wa.
BACode Business Name [rtt Map No +LT� '" - - ��
1455 ' r eiY 6r
Administration AppraisalFL vl . ` F1 � ,� � '
' fa ery,i,[1,„[..
1 Names 1 Realware
2 Situs Address 2 Personal Property L12A :' I "AI I:
3 Mobile Home 3 Protest ,' ' tile, : ti'9 CBOE Protest
4 Tract/Section 4 Building Permits `' [ ,.,d ,:a
5 Condominiums 5 Value Tracking'->i",k';!
6 Block &Lot 6 Oil &Gas Master x `C
7 Book & Page/Sales 7 Railroads
8 Miscellaneous Current Year Prior Version Go To Imaging a i
9 Tax Items Prior Year Next Version View Images � {
70 Pre/Succeed g
11 Remarks Next Year Clerk's Doc's Print Images •
12 Tax Sale
13 Special Assessments
Update Clear Exit GII
14 Mines —1-__. - ,�-
MASTER
2
3
4 LEGALDATA
5 I EQUENC NERSTART!VERENDI
Account Owner Name/ toss
N ® Twn? I Blk/Lot I Condo? l' ,ile?I Sales? 1
R0224894 ELLIS DAVID B &JULIE L 1 - Legal Description -
Year District 1 17583 CLARA LEE ST _ 1
BRIGHTON CO 80601 I MB-10 L10 MARTIN BROS PUD
1997 0800 . AMENDED PLAT
Apr Dist St i
A
Parcel Number MH Space Sequence L ---- _-- — - -- -- _-- ------
147112403010
S 14 DTI 9 T a' :51 ? Type
,,,,,,,i,„,.,
,' X141' Di,.. Met 'II 1> m
mass, la w �"' a di �€ 'tf gR S, ui
Acct Type Lagt na zi
rialx ' .:r: a a 111 Residential t , . e .., ...:;.' e^ ,,... � o oar
BACode , Business Name Map No :. 3 n a w s
1455 �" r� sx t. o ,M1-s� ✓.yk)�i; ° .;k
-
Administration Appraisal " ' xt ': x x 5�<� ' °fit ;
1 Names 1 Realware
2 Situs Address 2 Personal Property 3n4 ° d rjr I 't '' CBOE Protest
/ 3 Mobile Home 3 Protest ,x; as an:t.7•4
e
4 Tract/Section 4 Building Permits -•-^-
5 Condominiums 5 Value Tracking
6 Block & Lot 6 Oil &Gas Master
7 Book & Page/Sales 7 Railroads Current Year Prior Version Go To Imaging
9 Tax Items Prior Year Next Version View Images
10 Pre/Succeed
11 Remarks j Next Year Clerk's Doc's Print Images
12 Tax Sale
13 Special Assessments Update Clear Exit
14 Mines
MASTER
2
3
4 I LEGALDATA
5
r EQUENC I�/ERSTARTI VEREND I
Account Owner Name// ,ress -_
NTWn? Blk/Lot Condo? I 'jibe? Sales?
R6222486 - - —DONAHUE RICHARD MICHAEL & r7.7757 .A. Legal Description
Year District ELIZABETH A
4119 MARTIN 15871-E PT SE4 12 1 66 BEG
1997 0800 BRIGHTON CO 80601 N89D58'W 1170' &NOD27'E 950'
FROM SE COR OF SEC CONT NOD27'E
Apr Dist St i 180' N89D58'W 500' THENCE SOD27'W
360' 389D58'E 250' NOD27'E 180'
A S89D58'E 250' TO BEG
Parcel Number MH Space Sequence - ----- _- - -
147112400008
Stree C 0 ',rep No §1.111,11111,1,11,02.,7424,. s II Type
h ;{s6 eCt 1 d a , 5
am lifh ,,,^. 4:-47-. ,e. a ' zF ° (,l4 t
Lb' .$.` . ti ( Acct Type Lagt —I P.liglike 7w 'a4
BACode Business Name IMap No , as . ¢ , r -4
gi
u 6x.v
Administration Appraisal , t ..®71 `' r
1 Names - 1 Realware - -_-- ^^^°
2 Situs Address 2 Personal Property `� # -'* ` CBOE Protest
3 Mobile Home 3 Protest a ` a
4 Tract/Section 4 Building Permits '
5 Condominiums 5 Value Tracking
6 Block & Lot 6 Oil &Gas Master ..ii
7 Book & Page/Sales 7 Railroads Current Year Prior Version Go To Imaging
8 Miscellaneous
9 Tax Items Prior Year Next Version View Images
10 Pre/Succeed •
-F3
11 Remarks Next Year Clerk's Doc's Print Images
12 Tax Sale
13 Special Assessments Update Clear Exit
14 Mines _
MASTER
1
2
3
4 , LEGALDATA
5 EQUENCIVERSTARTIVERENDl
Account N Owner Name/F ess �Twn? I Blk/Lot .I Condo?' pile?I sales?)
_
R0224494 [-----m ml WILLIAM M & KAREN S 1 ' Legal Description
MINN
Year District 4345 ELIZABETH ST
BRIGHTON CO 80607 MB-6 L6 MARTIN BROS PUD -AMENDED
1997 0800 PLAT %4345 ELIZABETH ST% I
Apr Dist St
A JI
Parcel Number MH Space Sequence ----_----- ------ --- —�
147112403006
itsHD7 re F"II%If rt.4,141,;EILT`I';•9Eh2F1 a tintc4,24tuirr [Nunso• ' Ill e 1 Acct Type Lagt ° . t -,..k, -I; � ,
' Ir 1 o,i Residential ati 3 .,ic .r e •lanc . s`'4 n c a e
BACode Business Name 1Map No iriftl. r rrICT-InrEVyy
1455 r i. '4 i:it 7` :-,r4
Administration Appraisal risbpi? 'Y; 'k 71171;771 evff ` r•q
1 Names � 1 Realware '�"�°� '--"`� �"`^� �-- -�•^-�
2 Situs Address I 2 Personal Property S. t t W7 '," CBOE Protest
3 Mobile Home 3 Protest a -{
to a
4 Tract/Section 4 Building Permits `"''
5 Condominiums 5 Value Tracking
6 Block & Lot 6 Oil & Gas Master
7 Book & Page/Sales 7 Railroads Current Year Prior Version Go To Imaging
8 Miscellaneous 9 9
9 Tax Items Prior Year Next Version View Images
10 Pre/Succeed
11 Remarks Next Year Clerk's Doc's Print Images
12 Tax Sale
13 Special Assessments Update Clear - Exit
14 Mines I
MASTER
. _
3 I
4 LEGALDATA
5 7 EQUENC IVERSTARTI VEREND
Account Owner Name/f ess IIII_Twn? I Blk/Lot I Condo? I;' 'le? I Sales?
R0073891 gp,RRUTIAJOSE LUIS & TERESA I.'� "' 1+
Legal Descriptionri Year District 17952 CLARA LEE ST
BRIGHTON CO 80601 MB 22 L22 MARTIN BROS PUD -
1997 0800 AMENDED PLAT
-
Apr Dist St
A
Parcel Number MH Space Sequence - -- - - ----- _- -- --
147112403022
I. cinlirri A' .7,r Ith ... ,..... ,',"L-Q. ' . 110" L
TY e _ s _..
- . :.e' :�,"^� gam.
L d3ti I `1n ,34, . .. !
c . Acct TY" Lagt . : .
.i.:4,,,.:riliggekhjafprifil a r m=3 1 ar k Residential " <a e a r r r e
BACode Business Name Map No -'?_' w,ThiPirg. h- �' �+ �, ;
gafcri
2480 L ;( `r;uu.,v I,.. .� rCk' ak
Administration Appraisal
I =r4
r
1 Names ' 1 Realwareeg - pae�.b G3�+Tsi
2 Situs Address 2 Personal Property II"' i 's+°31' T �€r1 '13,»''�
CBOE Protest
3 Mobile Home 3 Protest r.r r
4 Tract/Section 4 Building Permits � ..
5 Condominiums 5 Value Tracking
6 Block & Lot 6 Oil & Gas Master
7 Book &Page/Sales 7 Railroads
8 Miscellaneous Current Year Prior Version Go To Imaging
9 Tax Items Prior Year Next Version I View Images JIE
10 Pre/Succeed
11 Remarks Next Year Clerk's Doc's Print Images
12 Tax Sale
13 Special Assessments Update Clear Exit
14 Mines
MASTER
tI 1
2
3
4 LEGALDATA
5 TEQUENC ,.ERSTARTI VEREND I
LAW OFFICE OF
JOHN R. DENT, P.C.
332 Denver Avenue Phone: (303) 857-4667
P.O. Box p333 Metro: (303) 659-2028
Fort Lupton,CO 80621 Fax: (303) 857-2467
January 27, 1998
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Co
Mr. and Mrs. Wade Frarck
17576 Argie Street
Brighton, CO 80601
RE: PARTICIPATION IN AN IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT-PAVING OF ARGIE STREET-ADDITIONAL
CONTRIBUTION BY MARTIN BROTHERS
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Frarck:
On December 30, I wrote to you requesting that you consider voluntarily including your
property in the Improvement District being formed to pave the roads within Martin Brothers
Subdivision, suggesting to you that the paving of Argie Street would enhance the value of your
property and be a practical advantage to you.
To date, there is no indication that you are going to request that your property be
included.
Martin Brothers after considering the situation would like to make this one time offer as
an additional inducement to you and Mr. and Mrs. Allensworth to include your properties. If you
and the Allensworths were to include your properties in the Subdivision, Martin Brothers
would be willing to contribute an additional $1,000 toward the cost of the project. That would
reduce the estimated cost for paving Argie Street from $9,420.00 to $8,420.00. However,
this offer is expressly contingent upon both you and the Allensworths agreeing to include your
property and pave Argie Street, and the offer will expire at the conclusion of the hearing
scheduled February 4, 1998.
This is a one time offer only and will not be repeated. I would strongly urge you to give
it your consideration.
Since 6I,,
(:///lif
Z
John R. Dent
JRD: bd
cc: Lee Morrison, A ssistant County Attorney
Drew She:tinga, County Engineer
David Ellis
LAW OFFICE OF
• JOHN R. DENT,P.C.
332 Denver Avenue Phone:(303) :.?57-:7667
P.O. Box '333 Metro: (303) 659-2028
Fort Lupton,CO 80621 Fax: (30i 3) 857-2467 .
• , C 1::),
January 29, 1998
CERTIFIED MAIL 0
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. and Mrs. Bill Aiicnsworth
17575 Argie Street .
Brighton, CO £,0601
RE: PARTICIPATION IN AN IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT-PAVING OF ARGIE STREET-ADDITIONAL
CONTRIBUTION BY MARTIN BROTHERS •
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Aliensworth:
On December 50, I wrote to you requesting that you consider voluntarily including your
property in the improvement District being formed to pave the roads within Martin Brothers
Subdivision, suggesting to'you that the paving of Argie Street would enhance the value of your
property and 6e a practical advantage to you.
•
To date, there is no indication that you are going to request that your property be
included.
L.
fit shin F roThe::. aot'er considering the situation would like to make this one time offer as
.an additional inducement to you and Mr. and Mrs. Frarck to include your properties. If you and
the Frarcks were to include your. properties in the subdivision, Martin Brothers would be
willing to contribute an additional $1,000.60 toward the cost of Inc project. That would reduce
the estimated cost for paving Argie Street from $9,420.00 to $8,420.00. However, this offer
is expressly cent;: gent upon both you and the Frarck's agreeing to inc!ude your property and
pave Archie Street, and the offer will expire at the conclusion of the heating scheduled February
4, 1998.
This is a one time offer only and will not be repeated. .i v;ould strongly urge you to give
it your consideration.
/ ..,.yX ' /�
/. Chin R. Dent
cc: Leo Morrison, Assistant County.Attorney
Drew Shc:!tinga, Oo�rnt' Eno!neer
i e'.ri E;:i5 t
I
Art
Ce
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
PHONE (970) 356-4000, M. 3750
FAX: (970) 352-2868
Wilip O 933 NORTH 11TH AVENUE
P.O. BOX 758
COLORADO GREELEY,COLORADO 80632
January 16, 1998
Mr. and Mrs. Wade Frarck
17576 Argie Street
Brighton, CO 80601
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Allensworth:
As you are aware,the Board of Weld.County Commissioners is in the process of creating the Martin
Brothers PUD Local Improvement District for the purpose of paving the streets inside the
subdivision. Clara Lee Street and Elizabeth Street are to be paved,however,Argie Street,that serves
your property,has not been included in the district.
Clara Lee, Elizabeth, and Argie Streets are not maintained by Weld County. After Clara Lee and
Elizabeth Streets are paved,they will be accepted by Weld County for maintenance. If Argie Street
is not paved, it will not be accepted for maintenance.
Although Argie Street cannot be included in the Improvement District, at this time, the Board of
Weld County Commissioners wishes to extend the opportunity for you to voluntarily participate in
paving Argie Street. The estimated total cost is $9.420. If Argie Street is paved, it will then be
accepted by Weld County for maintenance.
You are welcome to attend the hearing for the Martin Brothers PUD Local Improvement District on
February 4,.1998, at 10:00 a.m. in the First Floor Hearing Room of the Weld County Centennial
Center at 915 10th Street, Greeley, CO. If you have any questions or wish to discuss the matter
further,please contact me.
Sincerely
Drew Scheltinga
County Engineer
cc: Commissioner Webster
Lee Morrison,Assistant County Attorney
p. .
60 T1
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
II
PHONE (970) 356-4000, EXT. 3750
WI FAX: (970) 352-2868
C. 933 NORTH 11TH AVENUE
P.O. BOX 758
GREELEY, COLORADO 80632
COLORADO
January 16, 1998
Mr. and Mrs. Bill Allensworth
17575 Argie Street
Brighton, CO 80601
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Allensworth:
As you are aware,the Board of Weld County Commissioners is in the process of creating the Martin
Brothers PUD Local Improvement District for the purpose of paving the streets inside the
subdivision. Clara Lee Street and Elizabeth Street are to be paved,however,Argie Street,that serves
your property, has not been included in the district.
Clara Lee, Elizabeth, and Argie Streets are not maintained by Weld County. After Clara Lee and
Elizabeth Streets are paved,they will be accepted by Weld County for maintenance. If Argie Street
is not paved, it will not be accepted for maintenance.
Although Argie Street cannot be included in the Improvement District, at this time, the Board of
Weld County Commissioners wishes to extend the opportunity for you to voluntarily participate in
paving Argie Street. The estimated total cost is $9.420. If Argie Street is paved, it will then be
accepted by Weld County for maintenance.
You are welcome to attend the hearing for the Martin Brothers PUD Local Improvement District on
February 4, 1998, at 10:00 a.m. in the First Floor Hearing Room of the Weld County Centennial
Center at 915 10th Street, Greeley, CO. If you have any questions or wish to discuss the matter
further, please contact me.
,Sipcerel
Drew Scheltinga
County Engineer
cc: Commissioner Webster
Lee Morrison, Assistant County Attorney
LAW OFFICE OF
JOHN R. DENT, P.C.
332 Denver Avenue Phone:(303) 857-4667
P.O.Box #333 Metro: (303) 659-2028
Fort Lupton,CO 80621 Fax: (303) 857-2467
December 30, 1997
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. and Mrs. Wade Frarck O
17576 Argie Street CO n A
Brighton, CO 80601 `/\//V/
RE: PARTICIPATION IN IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, PAVING OF ARGIE STREET
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Frarck:
At the request of the County Commissioners, Martin Brothers, L.L.C. would like to join
with the County Commissioners in requesting that you give consideration to voluntarily
including your property in the Improvement District which is being formed to pave roads
within the Martin Brothers subdivision.
As I believe you are aware, as presently configured the Improvement District is not
going to include the paving of Argie Street but will pave only Elizabeth and Clara Lee Streets.
The County Commissioners and Martin Brothers would like to give you and your neighbor on
Argie Court one final opportunity to include your properties and pave Argie Street.
In the long run, we believe it would be very much in your best interest. The paving of
Argie Street will enhance the value of your property on a long term basis and will immediately
benefit you from the standpoint of improved access to your property. There will be less dust,
mud, etc. to deal with and the County is willing to accept the responsibility for maintenance
including snow removal once the streets are paved.
As I believe you are aware, Martin Brothers has historically assisted with maintenance
but it is a continual struggle and if Argie Street is the only street not paved in the subdivision it
will be even more difficult. Martin Brothers has committed to contribute $14,000.00 to help
defray the cost of the Improvement District.
Consequently, in behalf of Martin Brothers, we would like to urge you to have Argie
Street paved. There is a total cost as estimated by the County Engineer for paving Argie Street at
$9,420.00 based on the cost of the paving. Your one-half of that expense, we believe, will be
more than outweighed by the increased value of your property represented by this improvement
and it woul -be a permanent solution to the maintenance issue as well.Sinc e ,dilly
ohn R. Dent
JRD:br
cc: Lee Morrison, Assistant County Attorney
Drew Scheltinga, County Attorney f�
David Ellis
LAW OFFICE OF
JOHN R.DENT, P.C.
332 Denver Avenue Phone:(303) 857-4667
P.O.Box #333 Metro: (303) 659-2028
Fort Lupton,CO 80621 Fax: (303) 857-2467
December 30, 1997
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. and Mrs. Bill Allensworth CO
D
17575 Argie Street U
Brighton, CO 80601 U
RE: PARTICIPATION IN IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, PAVING OF ARGIE STREET
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Allensworth:
At the request of the County Commissioners, Martin Brothers, L.L.C. would like to join
with the County Commissioners in requesting that you give consideration to voluntarily
including your property in the Improvement District which is being formed to pave roads
within the Martin Brothers subdivision.
As I believe you are aware, as presently configured the Improvement District is not
going to include the paving of Argie Street but will pave only Elizabeth and Clara Lee Streets.
The County Commissioners and Martin Brothers would like to give you and your neighbor on
Argie Court one final opportunity to include your properties and pave Argie Street.
In the long run, we believe it would be very much in your best interest. The paving of
Argie Street will enhance the value of your property on a long term basis and will immediately
benefit you from the standpoint of improved access to your property. There will be less dust,
mud, etc. to deal with and the County is willing to accept the responsibility for maintenance
including snow removal once the streets are paved.
As I believe you are aware, Martin Brothers has historically assisted with maintenance
but it is a continual struggle and if Argie Street is the only street not paved in the subdivision it
will be even more difficult. Martin Brothers has committed to contribute $14,000.00 to help
defray the cost of the Improvement District.
Consequently, in behalf of Martin Brothers, we would like to urge you to have Argie
Street paved. There is a total cost as estimated by the County Engineer for paving Argie Street at
$9,420.00 based on the cost of the paving. Your one-half of that expense, we believe, will be
more than outweighed by the increased value of your property represented by this improvement
and it woul be a permanent solution to the maintenance issue as well.
Sinc e ,a1
ohn R. Dent
JRD:br
cc: Lee Morrison, Assistant County Attorney
Drew Scheltinga, County Attorney
David Ellis •
L-3/4 WELD COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
rs PHONE: (970) 356-4000, EXT. 4391
FAX: (970) 352-0242
915 TENTH STREET
lunge P.O. BOX 1948
GREELEY, COLORADO 80632
January 15, 1998
COLORADO
Cynthia McDaniel
4110 Elizabeth Street
Brighton, CO 80601
RE: Martin PUD Local Improvement District
Dear Ms. McDaniel: •
You are aware that a Local Improvement.District has been proposed for the Martin PUD area to
finance paving of those roads including Elizabeth Street. You may also be aware that there has
been a recent discussion as to whether or not your property should be included in the Local
Improvement District and whether or not there was an error made in not including your property.
The County Engineer and I have reviewed the situation and have concluded that the failure to
include your property in the Local Improvement District was not a type of clerical error which
would allow it to be added in at this late date. Therefore, you are advised that your property will
not be considered for inclusion at the hearing on the 4th day of February, 1998 at 10:00 a.m. in
the first floor hearing room of the Weld County Centennial Center, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley,
Colorado 80631.
Your presence is welcomed if you wish to attend the hearing for your own information.
Additionally, should you choose to participate voluntarily by making a contribution toward the
paving of the subdivision, this matter could be discussed with the Board at the time of the formal
hearing.
Please contact me or Mr. Scheltinga at 356-4000, extension 4750 if you have any further
questions.
Y s truly,
e D. M6rrison
24? 912.(.
ssistant Weld County Attorney
LDM/db:Mcdaniel
pc: Drew Scheltinga
Board of County Commissioners
Clerk to the Board
Hello