The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About690239.tiffRESOLUTION RE: AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY ATTORNEY TO DEFEND THE BOARD AND ALL NAMED DEFENDANTS IN THE CASE, EN- TITLED H. GORDON HOWARD vs. HAROLD W. ANDERSON, ET. AL, CIVIL ACTION NO. C-1330, IN THE FEDERAL DIS- TRICT COURT, DENVER, COLORADO. BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of County Commissioners, Weld County, Colorado, authorizes the County Attorney to defend said Board and all named defendants in the case of H. Gordon Howard vs. Harold W. Anderson, et. al. , also, to employ co -counsel and to do whatever is nec- essary in bringing the matter to a speedy conclusion. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, AND IT HEREBY IS ORDERED that the County of Weld assume the cost of the defense of the above entitled action until final determination of the case. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted this 9th day of April A. D. 1969 by the following vote: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WEL,I) COUNTY, COLORADO 12/14?C fly jJ��i ( ATTEST: Clerk of the Board 690239 CIV. 1 (2-64) SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION (Formerly D.C. Form No. 45 Rev. (6-13)) FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO to I CIVIL ACTION FILE NO. " H. GORDON HOWARD , . PLAINTIFF, PRO S3, Plaintiff v. HAROLD VV. ANDiRSON, , GLENN K. BILLINGS, AND c;IAR$}L . £1L ANDERSON, AND JOHN WATSON, AND S yli TELEP, D LEOLARD BARTELS, AND PHILIP BO:1rLES, _tONALD H. ITMAN, AND J. BEd NIX, AND HENRY B_RUNNER, AND TH + BOARD OF CO-UL:TY COi•::I;ia SEiI.J ER.S OF WELD COUNTY! ColoradoVelend t AND THE PLAbNING CC,.h;IIS.:I�N �..F Weld COUNTY COLORADO. Dia? YNDANTS. To the above named Defendant s: You are hereby summoned and required to serve upon H. GORDON HOWARD, PLetIirTIFP, t-ali Sig, SUMMONS allixrtif₹'smtt#yt , whose address is 2470 South Ivanhoe ?'l,Ice, Holly H; lls, Denver, Colora.lo, 80222 AND FILE WITH THE, CLERK OF THIS COURT an answer to the complaint which is herewith served upon you, within 20 days after service of this summons upon you, exclusive of the day of service. If you fail to do so, judgment by default will be taken against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. G. WALTER BOWMAN k of Court. Deputy Clerk. [Seal of Court] Date: March 17, 1969, A. D. Note: —This summons is issued pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. USW States District CSR Denver, Colorady MAR 17 196@ Ili THE Din.i'.i:tICT CLUfiT OF mie i7 `-L, " 1� A.:) . OR .1'_:i• Di -2. ICl: Vl O LC LL/ CIVIL 3C'.fi Tv, FILS :;C. / ) V;. AAR',,iL11 d. A.r'D..,'rt:JON 1, �xLL' 1� iV K. BI LL! :\ GS , .; D t..ri,' :J1:s.7.75 ) _i. D..1.)Iv, AND JC'h1 •'d_1T"?f td, ) AND Sllhii VEEP, An L �uNAL.D ) BAIITELS , = N.L rhI _,IP KILLS, ) AND lilt AALJ,! ilL'I'jl.µAN, 1iLD ) J. AND B�'ti :;1� 13C.�:t{L AND Gr•jiC�UNTYld izUi: ;��R , ) ) C..11• L ICiv" I,: S OF WELD COdNTY, C kLOR_: OD , AND Ttl_& PI, AN N1 iii G CC.:...i&oiON OF WELD CGb IY, ) CG?,{:_f :Dt:, ) D. Ei1DiiiiT'S. ) C."' t) CLI:L L..:N'1' UND R 14th .i& ZDIL_i T TO ._HE bNI �i) i T1.T C�•:v,`;'!'liLi'l�T` y1� J UNDat jj _ T D STIT'ES CIVIL _ t.rc.'1'S ACT. COMBS NOW, ':214E Pl7i ntirf, H. Gordon Howard, above -named, Pro Se, and- complains and alleges, to wit: FOE i. Fillol' CLAIM. . 3,. This first claim raises a f.deral and constitutional question, arising under the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution, wherein a certain County Zoning Ordinance of Weld County, Colorado, with no "Title", and no "Numbering" is in direct ect conflict with the due process of law clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the ;: n_ ited States Constitution. 2. The rlAi.ntiff is the title bolder of a mobile boas trailer court 3nd ca1upground, situated on the :;,ast 3/4 of td i'. :r. 1/4 of Section 17, Taw. 7, North Range 67, '"'eF:t of yre 6th P. 1!. in Weld County,Colorado, Nord ri nr Celor ado p'aved _,i.bway nubered 1.4, and known as the 1 i_ne Lake Triler Resort and Canrpp:•,?ound, licensed by the rate of Colorado as number 498 for 1969. The defendants are as follows: (1) '211E Board of County Commis. ioners 5. ;n rho 23rd &.y of ?f,vewbor. 1966, .:a : 3c,erd of County Conaieei;nerg s:i ;eld County, Colorado, en.ntect * tawny 4,t,Ait rw Somit which is, ad w ,i,t ant® otitis'', wttcb * , to n t w ich wa:+ ti led co of Weld November ra >n of e td 447, and said tn4tnart,nv ar; x ruveete4 my ': u /leek, uty County Clerk, en- On (1104 by jinn ;;,gerrer, w,. is Cos,gty clock an: a eeoyd.ar for WWealcl C:.w.:nty, Color 4. ?hit �1 F! y^air 3, -Jar,,., of .^ .. ty C meet nor, of Weld Co, ty lid provide ;n nubst ice D: Q ai: conics?' orin nce ttset ;; 1; th ..n!F„ 'n Wea.l1 r =u- ty, wb9r4ver nitunted, t -.t .,, n .w n nae:rpcar ,tn4 o a?rct u iy, would bw ran.ni .n :vne A....for 4 Connty.Cclorbdo of skid County, mill is peliti:o. (2) The County :lioniny Cola soin, of ,mld s nty. a iah under V lutsbe 5 of?aelvr .;io vi • sei rtstutes of 1953, C4iiPB0r luf, it ,:, e T, ,and a part of, ,:he 7bo,rd or Gflty t mere of Geld County. ve rust of (3) a^r�a1 :,.cis! CCOt ty, (4) W•Andor DO, a C=.7unty tit.4aly:>TM of tho ***rd. Anaz , 2a.ld, County bar of too !Ward County tonwr of told County, Ano , »a, bu: zfJ the B©ord. (6) 644 ounty, „rd the (7) ►ty Flenninp (e) y F1rutotn, Co at!htt *,*r , ha w4*teen. r •ean n u 1 rally . r thereof. er of the (9) railiy Bowl,,e, Weld County :'leaning Contusion. (1C)Reneld eftitsa , a member of the 14 t r unay , tinnia6 Co ;ion. (11)J. p}t Nix , a meaeb r c>r the id Coup y ?leaning Coa►a.weioa, (12) Henry Benner. 4 a,a,r„her ixli Goant,f 12ntlntrig Co,,wleotou. bee^sa effective t≥ramediitrly, C -unty Clerk inl Auc, rlaria reception aasb,r 14 7499 tin it 2,22 O'clock i. if. in tte<≥ xt 0. *grieultural purposes only. 5. The sat i ordinance iaa so vague, uncertain, and indefinite, aad lacking in standards for justifying son'-ng, or rezoning that ;t is invalid and unenforceable, and contrary to due pbosese of law. 6. 'the etid lining ordinanae,restricting the use to which property may be put,bears no substantial relation to public health, safety, morals, or general welfare, and is so arbitrary, and unreasonable that it is in conflict with the Plaintiff's rights of due process of law under the 14th aaendaent to the United ttatea ta****a *e Constitution. 7. The County Board of Comaiesioners of Weld County has no valid or legal power vested in then to pass zoning ordinances, and in consequence thereof their passage of said aforementioned , oning ordinance is unconstitutional. The Provisions of the Colorado Constitution do not authorize the legislature to grant power to the goveann6 authorities of Counties to pass 'toning ordinances. S. The said zoning ordinance attempts to impose unreasonable restrictions on the Plaintiff's vested business sad property rights as a United States Citisen, which business and property rights were acquired before the enactment of the said invalid and unconstitutional ordinance, and are protected by the 14th amendment to the U. 3.Constttutlom. 9. The said unconstitutional zoning ordinance constitutes a continuous interference with, and nuisance to, and conflict with, plaintiff** property rights toss in such a manner as to deny the Plaintiff the protection of due process* of law under the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution; and its enforcement would not benefit the health, safety, oonveniae, or general welfare of the territory in which Plaintiff's bus; neaa and property is situated, but would on the other hand, promote merely private rights, private desires, or private comfort, or satiny purely personal or aesthetic desires of the defendants, and therefore it is unconstitutionally in conflict with Plaintiff's rights under the said 14th asendsent to the U. 6. Constitution. 10. '--e e er -"' ce_; _ c n.ti nu ,us n_uionce, end i.nte rfer -:r.ce ►vie}' ;.n:' de-.. ee to j 1-.r..t?ff's C '_^st .tjti:nel rie is U.ndey uee 14th :, e,-,dij. nt to .he 1. 0 :n.situt:ion, $.n.) ;; . _. fo :e it should be enjoine.' perm n_ntly from being enforced in order to or•'.tect pleintiff's buy :.nos:: ::nd eropety ts, ae a- United St:3tes Citizen. 11. damage to - 1 -;in tiff is irremedifial na irreperable, as e result of sid ordi.nqnce, and in conse uence thereof Plaintiff has suf ered actual d:.,:iaL;u: in the sum of i500,000.01 sand exempt:irr dam --e- in the sum of ;100,000.00 en pla ;_ ntiff' s first claim, he prays as follows: 1. '-ciat t.iie ueumt ;:ill adjud e ..n� :clere .. e siid orl'neece tr be i_?le--1 end unconstitutional,as it con:!?.i ct 'ith the 14th Amendment to tee -e • ited States Constitution. 2. That tee __onora.ble Court will issue nd rix,nt permanent in june J ion acainst enforcement of ;;:iid :. n_c•..nstituti_onal .arid void ordinance, restra-..ning its enforcement by the lefendents, their agents, servants, -nd eiployees. 3. ^hat this honorable Covrt will grant an award �.a u aae:. ages to the 1laintiff in the sum of 500,0:.0 actual d:3,na ;es, and f$100,000 e: em Lary d !manses; .n, such other and further relief end remedies as to t_eis Court :lee! se .a,. meet, just, end prciner in the premises. ****u****:x�.* **. *********** .•lei_ntiff, Pro Se, eeuw.i.e_L,U end alleges for a second end further claim, to wit: 1. The Fl -' nfi ^' rcernoretes h:.:^ :in_ Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, :=.nd 10 of the First C'_aim of this coii p1,' nt heren by reference thereto. 2. The second cl im arises under the provisions and intendments of the United States Civil Richts Statute found in U. S. C. A., Title 28, section 1343 (3). 3. The defendants art attepti ng to deprive, 3.n : are depriv ng, the plaintiff of his rights, privileges and immuni_ti;s sacur:.d br- the 14th . endment to t:` C. nstituti_cn of the United States, providing for lee eoual rights of citizens, or ell persons, ti:itltin the jurisdiction of th:. United fitates. That thirt sti•i depvtvuti a by to .fa! t'd iAtta .s baring stone un1cr } i:color of 4 al,,r44 ,tuti anal fatd illegal toning crciinsnoi , mo ti -rn*rlmraph 3 of srlw first oisin, wupre. j unconstitutional } 4. at?yhst ; e s result o.f/�*e nyforlce ►nt of i td �lnconsritutional ovn i or( nines; `:n ; no a dtr4ct result of tte harmful *x4. gtonon, c rrt a.ry to .P'l;eantiffs: w "i$ t du'.,,x'r1cors of 4`as f:fld* r the 14th ,.aantmsnt to the i,nt 1 .totes R uatitug.ion, the i rat..: ff hss been a 4 itc elti, and st ths sus of V300,C00 set*.sxl damages. ;rt - r1 t rk. .•nfarcrtr.nt of s iC um; ft* tttuti onal. toning nru .oancs la A fraud sad d.-ceit nn the p1\'-.,*.. ff.rasad hAs , an:i will dams e, hire in : .e :sue:, of #100,0 00 exenp1s t daangee. F l* Miff prri?s NO follows in repeat to his es,., nd and ft• r"'`.tr; ` o l , n,e to site 1. That tot& . ,ctirutie :Da rt sill grant tre, Awar0 hi ra V500,00,;) rest. a _ 4G0 1(,O,Ui t' exemplaryex‘mplary d,_ raaages, ram ft dir et +.-h,.: derprivct of by the defendants, an *nth of frhen, of �s't .r titfee C r,.4 tttuti ona1 Rights, :nd-r h,., cr..tor of t.1soiid ur:c .n :t'.tutt rnal Bening ordinance! r Plaintiff risks this Court to immanently j9.njotn the enforesaert of seta ord` nsnne. I wtuly • butted, i.nt»ff, Ss, C * sr l $ nstet. Ad,i ' ' `.r' of P1t ntif 1: 2470 F-outh IvAtihcc. 1 -ice, dolly Kills, 3axr"rur, Colorado, 80222 Hello