HomeMy WebLinkAbout951541.tiffRESOLUTION
RE: THE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, 1995, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
PETITION OF:
KLINGINSMITH STANLEY
KLINGINSMITH BEULAH
HC 63 BOX 68
BUSHNELL, NE 69128
DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: PIN: R 0123287 PARCEL: 021712000011 - 2903-A PT N2
12 11 59 EXC PARCEL DESC IN DEED #1531260 (5R) 2903-A PT N2 12 11 59 EXC PARCEL
DESC IN DEED #1531260 (5R)
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, organized as the
Board of Equalization for the purpose of adjusting, equalizing, raising or lowering the assessment
and valuation of real and personal property within Weld County, fixed and made by the County
Assessor for the year 1995, and
WHEREAS, said petition has been heard before the County Assessor and due Notice of
Determination thereon has been given to the taxpayer(s), and
WHEREAS, the taxpayer(s) presented a petition of appeal of the County Assessor's valuation
for the year 1995, claiming that the property described in such petition was assessed too high, as
more specifically stated in said petition, and
WHEREAS, said petitioner being present, and
WHEREAS, the Board has made its findings on the evidence, testimony and remonstrances
and is now fully informed.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld
County, acting as the Board of Equalization, that the evidence presented at the hearing supported,
in part, the value placed upon the property by the petitioner. The assessment and valuation of the
Weld County Assessor shall be, and hereby is, adjusted as follows:
OC:
Yv9OiLoL'Y uLti
951541
AS0032
RE: BOE - KLINGINSMITH STANLEY
Page 2
ORIGINAL ADJUSTED
Land
Improvements OR
Personal Property
TOTAL ACTUAL VALUE
$ 15,310 $ 14,783
68.794 68.794
$ 84,104 $ 83.577
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a denial of a petition, in whole or in part, by the Board of
Equalization may be appealed by selecting one of the following three options:
1. Board of Assessment Appeals: You have the right to appeal the County
Board of Equalization's (CBOE's) decision to the Board of Assessment Appeals
(BAA). Such hearing is the final hearing at which testimony, exhibits, or any
other evidence may be introduced. If the decision of the BAA is further
appealed to the Court of Appeals, only the record created at the BAA hearing
shall be the basis for the Court's decision. No new evidence can be introduced
at the Court of Appeals. (Section 39-8-108(10), CRS)
Appeals to the BAA must be made on forms furnished by the BAA, and
should be mailed or delivered within thirty (30) days of denial by the
CBOE to:
Board of Assessment Appeals
1313 Sherman Street, Room 523
Denver, CO 80203
Phone: 866-5880
OR
2. District Court: You have the right to appeal the CBOE's decision to the District
Court of the county wherein your property is located. New testimony, exhibits
or any other evidence may be introduced at the District Court hearing. For filing
requirements, please contact your attorney or the Clerk of the District Court.
Further appeal of the District Court's decision is made to the Court of Appeals
for a review of the record. (Section 39-8-108(1), CRS)
OR
3. Binding Arbitration: You have the right to submit your case to arbitration. If
you choose this option the arbitrator's decision is final and your right to appeal
your current valuation ends. (Section 39-8-108.5, CRS)
951541
AS0032
RE: BOE - KLINGINSMITH STANLEY
Page 3
Selecting the Arbitrator: In order to pursue arbitration, you must notify the
CBOE of your intent. You and the CBOE select an arbitrator from the official list
of qualified people. If you cannot agree on an arbitrator, the District Court of the
county in which the property is located will make the selection.
Arbitration Hearing Procedure: Arbitration hearings are held within sixty days
from the date the arbitrator is selected. Both you and the CBOE are entitled to
participate. The hearings are informal. The arbitrator has the authority to issue
subpoenas for witnesses, books, records, documents and other evidence. He
also has the power to administer oaths, and all questions of law and fact shall
be determined by him.
The arbitration hearing may be confidential and closed to the public, upon
mutual agreement. The arbitrator's written decision must be delivered to both
parties personally or by registered mail within ten (10) days of the hearing.
Such decision is final and not subject to review.
Fees and Expenses: The arbitrator's fees and expenses are agreed upon by
you and the CBOE. In the case of residential real property, such fees and
expenses cannot exceed $150.00 per case. The arbitrator's fees and expenses,
not including counsel fees, are to be paid as provided in the decision.
The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by
the following vote on the 1st day of August, A.D., 1995.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
WELD COUNTY, COJm.ORA
ATTEST:
Weld County Clerk to the Board
BY.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Dale K. Hall, Chairman
i/‘j17 o1.
arb?ra J. Kirkmeyer, ro-Tem g
Georget. Baxter
Constance L. Harbert
I /l)
W. Ifi
. Webster
?�n
951541
AS0032
T14 P¢ #j5
7/ 3 — e,t7 '4,
BOE DECISION SHEET
PIN #: R 0123287 PARCEL #: 021712000011
KLINGINSMITH STANLEY
KLINGINSMITH BEULAH
HC 63 BOX 68
BUSHNELL, NE 69128
HEARING DATE: August 1, 1995 TIME: 10:45 A.M.
HEARING ATTENDED? ON) NAME: +^
AGENT NAME:
APPRAISER NAME: -y
DECISION:
DECREASE IN VALUATION
INCREASE IN VALUATION
NO CHANGE IN VALUATION
ASSESSMENT RATIO
ACTUAL VALUATION
ORIGINAL SET BY BOARD
Land $ 1110
Improvements OR
Personal Property
Total Actual Value
COMMENTS:
MOTION BY (1 TO
SECONDED BY 734(2%
Failed to prove appropriate value
No comparables given
L _ Other:
Aft794
$ 84,104
1ROlc')-57's3 )7
R r>i 3gte
1Rc 1C' g�
Baxter -- )
Hall -- N)
Harbert -
Kirkmeyer -- N)
Webster - YJl)
RESOLUTION NO._ 951541
Wi�Yc.
COLORADO
July 17, 1995
KLINGINSMITH STANLEY
KLINGINSMITH BEULAH
HC 63 BOX 68
BUSHNELL, NE 69128
CLERK TO THE BOARD
PHONE (303) 356-4000 EXT.4218
FAX: (303) 352-0242
915 10TH STREET
P.O. BOX 758
GREELEY, COLORADO 80632
Parcel No.: 021712000011 PIN No.: R 0123287
Dear Petitioner(s):
The Weld County Board of Equalization has set a date of Tuesday, August 1, 1995, at or about
the hour of 10:45 A.M., to hold a hearing on your valuation for assessment. This hearing will be
held at the Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado, in the First Floor
Hearing Room.
You have a right to attend this hearing and present evidence in support of your petition. The Weld
County Assessor will be present before the Board. The Board will make their decision on the basis
of the record made at the aforementioned hearing, as well as your petition, so it would be in your
interest to have a representative present. If you plan to be represented by an agent or an attorney
at your hearing, prior to the hearing you shall provide, in writing to the Clerk to the Board's Office,
an authorization for the agent or attorney to represent you. If you do not choose to attend this
hearing, a decision will still be made by the Board by the close of business on August 10, 1995, and
mailed to you on or before August 16, 1995.
Because of the volume of cases before the Board of Equalization, all cases shall be limited to 15
minutes. Also due to volume, cases cannot be rescheduled. It is imperative that you provide
evidence to support your position. This may include evidence that similar homes in your area are
valued less than yours or you are being assessed on improvements you do not have. Please note:
The fact that your valuation has increased cannot be your sole basis of appeal. Without
documented evidence as indicated above, the Board will have no choice but to deny your appeal.
At least two (2) working days prior to your hearing the Assessor will have available, at your request,
the data supporting his valuation of your property.
KLINGINSMITH STANLEY - R 0123287
Page 2
Please advise me if you decide not to keep your appointment as scheduled. If you need any
additional information, please call me at your convenience.
Very truly yours,
BOARD OF EQUALIZATION.
. Warden,
Clerk to the Board
BY:
cc: Warren Lasell, Assessor
NOTICE OF ADJUSTMENT
UII ILcur]UCSI1 .,>> I;,: ,,..
1400 NORTH 17th AVE.
GREELEY,-COLORADO 80631 -..
PHONE (970) 353-3845, EXT. 3656
1111`P
41I( COLORADO
2903—A PT N2 12 11 59 EXC PARCEL DESC IN DEED
41531260 (5R)
999 99
OWNER KLINGINSMITH STANLEY AKA STANLEY J 1,
KLINGINSMITH STANLEY AKA STANLEY J B
KLINGINSMITH BEULAH AKA BUELAH MAE
HC 63 BOX 68
BUSHNELL
NE 69128
CR WELD
PARCEL
PIN
05/24/199:1
YEAR
LOG
021112000011
R 0123287
1995
02892
The appraised value of property is based on the appropriate consideration of the approaches to value required by law. The Assessor has determined
that your property should be included in the following category(ies):
RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY IS VALUED BY CONSIDERING THE MARKET APPROACH.
AGRICULTURAL LAND VALUE IS DETERMINED SCLELY BY THE EARNING OR PRODUCTIVE
CAPACITY OF THE LAND, CAPITALIZED AT A PATE SET 1311 LAW.
ALL OTHER PROPERTY, INCLUDING VACANT LAND, IS VALUED BY CONSIDERING THE COST.
MARKET, AND INCOME APPROACHES*
If your concern is the amount of your property tax, local taxing authorities (county, city, fire protection, and other special districts) hold
budget hearings in the fall. Please refer to your tax bill or ask your Assessor fora listing of these districts, and plan to attend these budget hearings
The Assessor has carefully studied all available information, giving particular attention to the specifics included on your protest and has deter
mined the valuation(s) assigned to your property. The reasons for this determination of value are:
YOUR VALUATION HAS BEEN ADJUSTED TO REFLECT THE FOLLOWING CHANGES:
PROPERTY CLASSIFICATION
PETITIONER'S
ESTIMATE
OF VALUE
ASSESSOR'S
VALUATION
ACTUAL VALUE
PRIOR TO REVIEW
ACTUAL VALUE
AFTER REVIEW
LAND
I MPS
TOTALS $
15,310
79,462
$. 94,112$
15,31(
68, 79,
84,10
If you disagree with the Assessor's decision, you have the right to appeal to the County Board of Equalization for further consideration,
39-8.108(1)(a), C.R.S. Please see the back of this form for detailed information on filing your appeal.
By:
WARREN L. LASELL
WELD COUNTY ASSESSOR
15-DPT-AR
Form PR -207-87194 -.
06/2.7/95
"Al. INF0RMATIQNN QN REVERSE SIDE
DATE
16
/3-
tiC/ :// ea Q I
-e-- L'/ „Az_
692-7-L:a 32 Al/≤ //-5 lx e 6 k4c.r1 a -n /I%,-
2 70,2 rail l /1- 5?
22D3 -A Pt A/2 /7--/1—s9 tL e e il.rc-eI
%fie S i ✓J Pee d /5.3/026T CS/C.)
1.-ez.a%
�Xit-c_Au ft-� J
H-Ui
0
a
J.i.
a 103" 7
o ILO 7
Pc-
OBOE
AUG. 1, 1995
KLINGIN9MITH, STANLEY J, AND
BEULAH MAE.
CONTAINS:
PIN # 0142886
pci # 0217-01-0-00-008
pin # 0151486
pot # 0219-06-0-00-001
pin # 0123287
pot # 0217-12-0-00-011
Prepared by
JERRY 9COBY
Registered appraiser
Weld co. Ag / Resid. appraiser
v
WELD CO. 1994 AG AREAS
R67W R66W R65W P64W R63W R62W R61W R60W R53W R58W R57W R56W
T4N
T3N
T2N
T1N
'12N
T11N
'14N
ir9 N
-illy
IN
T6N
5N
0051
0049
0047//
0045y/
0043/
0041,'
0039/
0037
0035
0033
003
002"
0201
0203
0205//020
f
0209/1
/
/0213f/
!
0215
0217
0219
0221
0223 ,
0303
0301
./0299
0297/0295/0293
//0291
0289
0287
0285
0283
0281
0453
0455
0457/
0459
/
/0461
//
/0463
•
,
/ 0465
/
0467
0469
0471 /
0473
0475
0555
0553
/0/5/51 /
O549 //0547
/r
/�5
0543
0541 ,
0539
0537
0535
0533
0705
0707
0709
/0711
/'713
0715 //0717
0719 /
0721
/
/ 0723
07257/Om
/
0807
0805
0803
0801
0799
0797
/
//
/ 0795.
!
R60W R53W R58W R57W R56W
T6N
T5N
T4N
T3N
T2N
T1N
0957
0959
0961
/0�
0965
/!/
/ 0/967
0969
1061
1059
yip
ii
i
�r
.
i
4
i h
{l0 , „
i , liI
ii.r,ni, i'tiii it
r0,,,,„,„, }ti '�
"410 j
i r u,ui`OA r.l
ih'{'�J�,
jr49d9�
it<lli'rwMti k
'0iI�W S'-�i1�5
���10476
unntth ili+Fii
1207
1209
iifl
17ir
i
r �:.
�L
i�lr{rIj`
215a���,I?
, rid�iai
Nil.
`1i'1i�'�11i �;p
M y�tU
tllrf 4rrUs
fWtr�u�r!��,h�s;z+a
I1.13�i�r3 �i�
'''' first
�I;I<i iUi{i��i
t21V+t��
t rpS a ieli
hip tt riihlir
���3�i bii
i��;i
';i1'�'{I��u;
. fx' '
1 �z21h1
iu qii ti,..
+'�9ll
; u �i u c
1313
1311
P�.
j��..
rgt.
A
i!
irndntsxigiq,
li "f; 3pir;tl
ao.; ,
1467
1469
t
n
l
{
t
i.
'
h i
it }`V'�
��i3tit1
Ski
1� i��'(
i n
fill il't
���
p�il
tI �p� zi
(' ,�a7 G ri
1 ill.
{ irI , i-
i� �i4$oy
`,� 4�,i;
R68W R67W R66W R65W P64W R63W R62W R61W
T12N
T11N
T1QN
T9N
T8N
TIN
ill IIJ 115 II/ IIY
: K I: M
R.59 Vt.
liaR16. .1i/07 = 6`b A
Oat)GruxiN5 `II = SS/,70A
8
8
SUNN YSIDE
CEMETERY
pvI
DV s
V
Avis
AV I I
P
C
Avu
P
/411 58
1 AVII
19
P
53"/7oQ
AJII gtu¢E'
5 P Avis
1
P
AVIIP 19
611, 3A
ifV 2Reta
Allot 3111 SRRIG /S.6s
Al 10'7 71V I' 418.63"
N 1441 AVIl f ASrUAVC g334-9
41 K'r Dv, II 4g.li
616 • 040
a .._...1(..-
4
SGS A< Pes
I76.CQ TIC
8
.112,3oA
SPRIG
O
OO
$6cr
30
30
4
69.3a
T 111= q4, 0r
4
58
0
00
Awl
p19
fly Okl Fnre"
s3,ga
e ly
30
5
g v11
St.9 A
FIV
AIV
S,NA Fly
On./ fiem
8
-37.7A
FIV
Al j 1903,4 4 00'• tDTAL I76,6A
Sill I,aa'
SU1= 4 ,69 OR 30
�IV rss C 1 V
S °V1 ` 30
4107 Sill I'1tle1G
44101 s iv i• '"mu 11'1x,16
NI al, C IV 4 DRY FM1em ry j 7
yl 21 joi1 I, 0 .,17s,rocs-g,
18.4-4,;
NI Hl '"a VII PAStKRt I49,ou ( ' S oil
NMI A vl a 4 '73.91
di t00
• 11
r&S
To?74'L Ares
613,00
l'R FPr2t
175,1 Ac.
XIE R'G r -Aran,
Ps Rc—
I gq,00 *t
Q�I
70
70
19
SUNNYSIDE
CEMETERY
SOME OF THE VALUE CHANGES ON THESE THREE PARCELS WAS A DIRECT RESULT
OF THE INCREASE IN THE 10 YEAR AVERAGE CROP PRODUCTION STATISTICS USED TO
VALUE THE BASE CROPS OF CORN, HAY AND WHEAT.
PRODUCTION FIGURES FROM 1982 & 1983 WERE DROPPED AND THE FIGURES FOR
1992 & 1993 WERE ADDED TO MAKE UP THE 10 YR. AVERAGE YIELDS. 1992/ 153.5
CORN - 4.90 TON HAY, AND 1993 / 142.5 CORN - 4.90 TON HAY. 1984 PRODUCTION
WAS 131.0 CORN - 3.95 TON HAY , FOR COMPARISON.
ALSO SOME VALUE INCREASES WERE DUE TO THE CHANGE OF THE CROP ROTATION
PERCENTAGES FROM 75% CORN AND 25% HAY, TO 60% CORN AND 40% HAY. AN
INCREASE IN HAY PRODUCTION INCREASES VALUES DUE TO MORE INCOME WITH LESS
EXPENSE.
SOME VALUE CHANGES ARE A RESULT OF CORRECTING ERRORS WE FOUND IN SOME
CALCULATIONS USED TO VALUE SOME TYPES OF LAND PRIOR TO THE 1996 APPRAISAL
YEAR. THOSE CORRECTIONS RESULTED IN GREATLY INCREASED VALUES IN 3 OR 4
SOIL CLASSIFICATIONS. UNFORTUNATELY, MR KLINGINSMITH'S LAND CONTAINED A
COUPLE OF THESE SOIL CLASSES.
EXAMPLES; CLASS 1994 1996 % INCR.
IRRIG.. 4107 .1 III 14248 213.31 49.7%
IRRIG. 4107 .1 IV 19.66 100.38 410.%
IRRIG. 4107 E IV 24.71 238.15 864 %
OF COURSE ALL THESE INCREASES ALSO REFLECT THE INCREASED PROD-
UCTION STATISTICS AS WELL AS THE CORRECTIONS IN THE CALCULATING FORMULA.
SIMILAR INCREASES OCCURRED IN SOME CORRESPONDING FLOOD IRRIG. LAND
VALUES.
I HAVE REMEASURED, AND CAREFULLY CHECKED THE CLASSIFICATIONS OF ALL SOIL
TYPES IN ALL THREE OF THESE PARCELS. I HAVE PHYSICALLY INSPECTED ALL THREE
PARCELS, AND ON ONE OCCASION I WAS GIVEN A FARM TOUR BY DAVID KLINGINSMITH.
THEREFORE, BASED ON MY INSPECTION, AND CLASSIFICATION CHECK, AND USING MY
MEASUREMENTS, AND THE SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICES MEASURED ACRES , PROVIDED BY
MR. KLINGINSMITH'S SON , I MAKE THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATIONS OF VALUES.
PIN # 0142886 PCL. # 0217-01-0-00-008
TOTAL FARM LAND $14,489.86
PIN # 0151486 PCL. # 0219-06-0-00-001
TOTAL FARM LAND $63,826.11
PIN # 0123287 PCL. # 0217-12-0-00-011
TOTAL FARM LAND $14,783.00
TOTAL IMPS $68,794.00
TOTAL LAND & IMPS 483,577.00
Hello