The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About991717.tiff RESOLUTION RE: THE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, 1999, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO - DENY PETITIONER'S APPEAL AND AFFIRM ASSESSOR'S VALUE PETITION OF: KAMMERZELL JACOB TRUST & JACOB JR AKA JAKE 25090 WELD CO RD 15 JOHNSTOWN, CO 80534 DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: ACCOUNT#: R1632486 PARCEL #: 095729000010 - 22642 S2SW4 29 5 67 (4R) %25090 WCR 15% SITUS: 25090 15 CR WELD WHEREAS. the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, convened as the Board of Equalization for the purpose of adjusting, equalizing, raising or lowering the assessment and valuation of real and personal property within Weld County, fixed and made by the County Assessor for the year 1999, and WHEREAS, said petition has been heard before the County Assessor and due Notice of Determination thereon has been given to the taxpayer(s), and WHEREAS, the taxpayer(s) presented a petition of appeal of the County Assessor's valuation for the year 1999, claiming that the property described in such petition was assessed too high, as more specifically stated in said petition, and WHEREAS, said petitioner being present, and WHEREAS, the Board has made its findings on the evidence, testimony and remonstrances and is now fully informed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, acting as the Weld County Board of Equalization, that the evidence presented at the hearing clearly supported the value placed upon the Petitioner's property, after review by the Weld County Assessor. Such evidence indicated the value was reasonable, equitable, and derived according to the methodologies, percentages, figures and formulas dictated to the Weld County Assessor by law. The assessment and valuation of the Weld County Assessor shall be, and hereby is, affirmed as follows: ACTUAL VALUE AS DETERMINED BY ASSESSOR Land $ 24,483 Improvements OR Personal Property 180,772 TOTAL ACTUAL VALUE $ 205,255 991717 _ _ , AS0043 RE: BOE - KAMMERZELL JACOB TRUST & JACOB JR AKA Page 2 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a denial of a petition, in whole or in part, by the Board of Equalization may be appealed by selecting one of the following three options; however, said appeal must be filed within 30 days of the denial: 1. Board of Assessment Appeals: You have the right to appeal the County Board of Equalization's (CBOE's) decision to the Board of Assessment Appeals (BAA). Such hearing is the final hearing at which testimony, exhibits, or any other evidence may be introduced. If the decision of the BAA is further appealed to the Court of Appeals, only the record created at the BAA hearing shall be the basis for the Court's decision. No new evidence can be introduced at the Court of Appeals. (Section 39-8-108(10), CRS) Appeals to the BAA must be made on forms furnished by the BAA, and should be mailed or delivered within thirty (30) days of denial by the CBOE to: Board of Assessment Appeals 1313 Sherman Street, Room 523 Denver, CO 80203 Phone: 866-5880 OR 2. District Court: You have the right to appeal the CBOE's decision to the District Court of the county wherein your property is located. New testimony, exhibits or any other evidence may be introduced at the District Court hearing. For filing requirements, please contact your attorney or the Clerk of the District Court. Further appeal of the District Court's decision is made to the Court of Appeals for a review of the record. (Section 39-8-108(1), CRS) OR 3. Binding Arbitration: You have the right to submit your case to arbitration. If you choose this option the arbitrator's decision is final and your right to appeal your current valuation ends. (Section 39-8-108.5, CRS) Selecting the Arbitrator: In order to pursue arbitration, you must notify the CBOE of your intent. You and the CBOE select an arbitrator from the official list of cualified people. If you cannot agree on an arbitrator, the District Court of the county in which the property is located will make the selection. Arbitration Hearing Procedure: Arbitration hearings are held within sixty days from the date the arbitrator is selected. Both you and the CBOE are entitles to participate. The hearings are informal. The arbitrator has the authority to issue subpoenas for witnesses, books, records, documents and other evidence. He also has the power to administer oaths, and all questions of law and fact shall be determined by him. 991717 AS0043 RE: BOE - KAMMERZELL JACOB TRUST & JACOB JR AKA Page 3 The arbitration hearing may be confidential and closed to the public, upon mutual agreement. The arbitrator's written decision must be delivered tc both parties personally or by registered mail within ten (10) days of the hearing. Such decision is final and not subject to review. Fees and Expenses: The arbitrator's fees and expenses are agreed upon by you and the CBOE. In the case of residential real property, such fees and expenses cannot exceed $150.00 per case. The arbitrator's fees and expenses, not including counsel fees, are to be paid as provided in the decision. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded adopted by the following vote on the 22nd day of July, A.D., 1999. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS r6.COUNT OL RA O ATTE �IS'� iii —_ i� Daley K. Hall, Chair Welt r "�au O9 e '.ard ; rBarbar J. Kirkmeyer, Pr o-Tem Depth ^�' e Board -re {r eorge . axter APPROVED FORM: / Bile Attorney 4 t //. i tant County Glenn Vaac� 991717 AS0043 fff NOTICE OF DENIAL OFFICE OF COUNTY ASSESSOR 1400 17thC AVE.LEH 22642 S2SW4 29 5 67 (4R) %25090 OREEEELEY, 80631 WCR 15% SITUS: 25090 15 CR WELD PHONE(970)353-3845,EXT.3650 WIWPc. COLORADO OWNER: KAMMERZELL JACOB TRUST & JACOB JR AKA KAMMERZELL JACOB TRUST & JACOB JR AKA LOG 88/88 JAKE PARCEL 095729000010 25090 WELD CO RD 15 ACCOUNT R1632486 JOHNSTOWN, CO 80534 YEAR 1999 - -' •_'" 06/28/1999 The appraised value of property is based on the appropriate consideration of the approaches to value required by law. The Assessor has"1¢termitied-that your property should be included in the-Following category(ies): , RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY IS VALUED BY CONSIDERING THE MARKET APPROACH. ^� If your concern is the amount of your property tax,local taxing authorities(county,city,fire protection,and other special districts)hold budget hearings in the fall. Please refer to your tax bill or ask your Assessor for a listing of these districts,and plan to attend these budget hearings. The Assessor has carefully studied all available information,giving particular attention to the specifics included on your protest,and has determined the valuation(s)assigned to your property. The reasons for this determination of value are: YOUR AGRICULTURAL LAND IS NOW CORRECTLY VALUED. THE PAST VALUE WAS INCORREDT AND THEREFORE YOUR INCREASE WAS HIGHER THAN NORMAL. HAD YOUR VALUE BEEN WHAT IT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE THE INCREASE WOULD HAVE BEEN ONLY $4236. PETITIONER'S ASSESSOR'S VALUATION PROPERTY CLASSIFICATION ESTIMATE OF VALUE ACTUAL VALUE ACTUAL VALUE PRIOR TO REVIEW AFTER REVIEW LAND 24483 24483 IMPS 180772 180772 TOTALS $ S 205255 $ 205255 If you disagree with the Assessor's decision,you have the right to appeal to the County Board of Equalization for further consideration,39-8- 106(1)(a),C.R.S. Please see the back of this form for detailed information on filing your appeal. By: Stanley F. Sessions 06/28/1999 WELD COUNTY ASSESSOR DAT E 15-DPT-AR Form PR-207-87/99 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON REVERSE SIDE YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO APPEAL THE ASSESSOR'S DECISION The County Board of Equalization will sit to hear appeals beginning July 1 and continuing through August 5 for real property (land and buildings) and personal property (furnishings, machinery, and equipment) 39-8-104 and 39-8- 107(2), C.R.S. APPEAL PROCEDURES: If you choose to appeal the Assessor's decision, you must appeal to the County Board of Equalization. To preserve your right to appeal, your appeal must be POSTMARKED OR DELIVERED ON OR BEFORE JULY 15 FOR REAL PROPERTY, AND JULY 20 FOR PERSONAL PROPERTY. WELD COUNTY BOARD OF EQUALIZATION 915 10th Street, P.O. Box 758 Greeley, Colorado 80632 Telephone (970)356-4000 Ext. 4225 NOTIFICATION OF HEARING: You will be notified of the time and place set for the hearing of your appeal. COUNTY BOARD OF EQUALIZATION'S DETERMINATION: The County Board of Equalization must make a decision on your appeal and mail you a determination within five business days of that decision The County Board must conclude their hearings by August 5. TAXPAYER RIGHTS FOR FURTHER APPEALS: If you are not satisfied with the County Board of Equalization's decision you must file within thirty days of the County Board of Equalization's written decision with ONE of the following: Board of Assessment Appeals (BAA): Contact the BAA at 1313 Sherman, Room 315, Denver, Colorado 80203, (303)866-5880. District Court: 9th Avenue and 9th Street, P.O. Box C Greeley, Colorado 80632 Telephone (970) 356-4000, Ext. 4520 Arbitration: WELD COUNTY BOARD OF EQUALIZATION 915 10th Street, P.O. Box 758 Greeley, Colorado 80632 Telephone(970) 356-4000, Ext. 4225 If you do not receive a determination from the County Board of Equalization, you must file an appeal with the Board of Assessment Appeals by September 10. TO PRESERVE YOUR APPEAL RIGHTS, YOU MUST PROVE YOU HAVE FILED A TIMELY APPEAL; THEREFORE, WE RECOMMEND ALL CORRESPONDENCE BE MAILED WITH PROOF OF MAILING. PETITION TO THE COUNTY BOARD OF EQUALIZATION In the space below, please explain why you disagree with the Assessor's valuation. IN ACCORDANCE WITH 39- 8-106, C.R.S., YOU MUST STATE YOUR OPINION OF VALUE IN TERMS OF A SPECIFIC DOLLAR AMOUNT. Attach additional documents as necessary. �� (,1/CL4--6,0'0- i Z A,v�� i/tt kC� ��¢f <ti'1" ��, �, � I; : x.24 % z��i A i t, ca?s cJt, 4(9-0-a i4' . / +- ( it--I 2 ) 11 q �i iJ SIUNA I URE Uh FE III RNLI( DA IL,E Jacob Kammer-tell Phone: 970-587-2859 25090'NCR l5 PAX: Johnstown,Co 80534 email: Friday,July 2, 1999 Weld County Board of Equalizations 915 10th Street PO Box 758 Greeley, Co 80632 Gentlemen: I have prepared two approaches to support why my land tax value has been over evaluated by the County Assessor in an accordance with 39-8-106,C.R.S.The rural properties under my ownership are S '/: of SE 1 of Sect 30 TS 5 N R67 and S V2 of SW ' of Sect 29 TS 5 N R 67.The income from these two 80 acre farms cannot be isolated into separate entities because the two properties are farmed as a single unit.Therefore I have combined the assessed tax value(S30)and S29) . Weld County Assessor claims that these two properties have a tax assessed land value of($24483 and$28369)for a total of$52852. Approach No 1. Based on Landlord Income 1998 Gross income of both farms $21015 1998 Farm expense of both farms $12344 1998 Net Income,both farms $ 8671 8671 divided by .13 Cap.rate $66700 66700 X .29 Assessment rate for both farms $19343 S29 has 57 acres of farm able land or 45.6 % of assessment $ 8820 S30 has 68 acres of farm able land or 54.4 % of assessment $10523 By this evaluation the farm tax value of the land in Sect 29 should have been assessed at$8820 instead of$24483.The farm in Sect 30 should have been assessed at$10523 instead of$28369. Approach No 2. Based on 10 year average of Corn and Hay Crop market value figures as offered by the County Assessors Office. Corn Price Old Value New Value Amt. Inc. % Inc. $2.24/bu $2.49/bu $.25/bu 11% Hay Price $75.67/ton $83.23/ton $7.56 10% Corn value is 60% of the factor that is used to increase land value tax. Hay value is 40% of the factor used to increase land value tax. When these values are combined a value of 10.6 % is achieved. If this percentage 10.6% is used to increase the assessed value of the land, the assess amount for the property in Sect 29 should be$22475 or an increase of$2[54 in evaluation. If this percentage, 10.6% is used to increase the assessed value of the land , the assess amount for the property in Sect 30 should be$26373 or an increase of$2528 in evaluation. I realize that property values have gone up and as such so must taxes. But the farmer and the rural property owner hasn't seen any increase in farm prices. Corn is now at$2.00/bu. Beans are at$13.50/cwt.Hay is at a lower price now than that of the old factor used prior assessments. If the farmer and the rural property owner is to survive some relief in tax increases is a necessity. TdGo/f,r✓C'YY� �� Jacob Kam merzell II D. ti N V N rn — 4a N O W 3 Li 0.1 ,c1 W r U = V] 4. O / N r-, 0 0\ 0, 0\ N Ca Wg V 0 3 � 0 E as I- El c a c./)s 3 U STANLEY F. SESSIONS WELD COUNTY ASSESSOR CHRISTOPPER WOODRUF=, DEPUTY ASSESSOR APPRAISAL REPORT OF AGRICULTURAL LAND FOR County Board of Equalization KAMMERZELL JACOB TRUST & JACOB JR AKA PETITIONER VS. WELD COUNTY ASSESSOR'S OFFICE RESPONDENT Parcel Number: 0957-30-0-00-009 Schedule Number: R1634186 Log Number: 92 Date: THURSDAY JULY 22 Time: 2:30 PM Board: CBOE PREPARED BY MICHAEL, IICyHAEE F. SAMPSON JULY 20,1999 -I e7577 Signature Date 7 ASSESSOR'S OFFICE STAFF APPRAISER ASSESSOR VALUE $46838 CBOE_AGLAND_010998 Page 1 VALUATION OF AGRICULTURAL LAND The actual value of agricultural lands, exclusive of building improvements thereon, shall be determined by consideration of the earning or productive capacity of such lands during a reasonable period of time, capitalized at a statutory rate of thirteen percent (13%), Colorado Constitution, Article X, Section 3(1)(a), and 39-1-103(5)(a), CRS. The method of appraising agricultural land for ad valorem taxation purposes, based on its earning or productive capacity, involves an "agricultural landlord formula" which has been approved and accepted by the Property Tax Administrator, the State Board of Equalization, the Statutory Advisory Committee to the Property Tax Administrator, county assessors, and members of the agricultural industry. Net income to the landlord is calculated by first determining a commodity price or grazing rental price averaged over the previous ten years multiplied by the appropriate yield based upon soil classification. Multiplying this gross income by the typical landlord's crop share results in the landlord's gross income. Typical landlord expenses, allowed on a statewide basis, are averaged over the preceding ten-year period and subtracted from the landlord's gross income to arrive at the landlord's net income. This income is capitalized by the statutory capitalization rate of 13 percent to arrive at an indication of value. Commodity prices, AUWI rental rates and allowable expenses are researched and recommended by the Statutory Advisory Committee to the Property Tax Administrator. These are reviewed by the State Board of Equalization, and when approved, their use is mandatory. TYPICAL LANDLORD EXPENSES All expenses must be documented and calculated as ten-year averages using the ten calendar years prior to the June 30 appraisal date for a specified level of value. Not all expenses are allowable. The first condition: it must be a typical landlord expense; the second condition: it must be necessary to cultivate a crop; and the third condition: it must be within the following allowable expense categories. For Irrigated Land Alfalfa seed expense (researched and provided by the Division of Property Taxation (DPT)) Landlord baling expense (researched and provided by DPT) Fence expense (researched and provided by DPT) Chemical pesticides, herbicides, fertilizer, and water expenses (researched locally) Corn seed expense for sprinkler irrigated corn only (researched locally) For Dry Farm Land Fence expense (researched and provided by DPT) Chemical pesticides, herbicides, and fertilizer expenses (researched locally) CBOE_AGLAND_010996 Page 2 For Meadow Hay Land Fence expense (researched and provided by DPT) Water expense (researched and provided by DPT) Fertilizer is a management decision based on the expectation of higher net income. If this is a management decision rather than a typical practice, neither the expense nor the added income is considered. For Grazing Land Fence expense (researched and provided by DPT) Water expense (researched and provided by DPT) ESTABLISH SOIL CLASSIFICATIONS The objective of soil classification is to determine the value of land used for agricultural purposes relative to the land's capability to produce agricultural products. The United States Sal Conservation Service (SCS) has researched and completed modern soil surveys in most of our Colorado counties. The required agricultural land classification program for property taxation purposes is based on the Soil Conservation Service soil survey guidelines. These guidelines include eight general land classifications. BASE CROPS ` e d County has established Corn for grain, Wheat and Hay as the base crops. Yields are determined for the base crops selected based on an average of the ten years prior to the specified level of value. The publication, Colorado Agricultural Statistics, is a reliable source of information regarding yields. CONCLUSION The subject property has been physically inspected to verify that the property should have the agricultural designation. The land has been valued according to the consideration of the earning or productive capacity of the land and capitalized at the statutory rate of thirteen percent (13%), Colorado Constitution, Article X, Section 3(1)(a), and 39-1-103(5)(a), CRS. INDICATED VALUE Land 28368 Improvements 18470 Total Value $ 46838 GBOE_AGLAND_010996 Page 3 M^ R�717. IOm - mm ' nM V Nulhmn yf 4 N ONc0M MMm Mmul nh I yk/l N YJ ONO .O O) m OI O O 10 W . ,.OI NO M.M ? N m M M'n m t0 t0 r/ 0 £ N N I.0 M M M N N N N M M O) - Vy N N N N N N N M N N u0 N l live, NN i9NNNNNNNNNN_ �3 NN NNUiNNNNN NNCJ -. err(' ( 17 o a` _ > , y. 0 o 4 n Ot `- N O t0 .. con 0 O GI O) co ./' w b .- N N t7 N n N Oa O. IQ m -'M fl •- O r 0 Gt OI O N r O n N UEr. 'W M; > ca .., rr tVNNNrrNNI'Y f1NN (np •S�• fr NN NN NNNNI'YN `IN 00 . NN osNNNNN W NNNN MN NNNNN W NNNI.NfJ E9-. w _. . Wf. w. w o m 3 3�f - -e 00 . n'/s "y1 ofr r- MVYVmOntOVmm 4'y'"tp?,' p nOmn00Nu'I nMn 3 C n) 41 .7 O r O O m 0 0 M O O I O N a, 1 1 O •I O N N M Q N 0 m l c, r• v 0 ( (V N N N N N t7 M N N "+N-A� r¢¢¢..- N N N N N N N N N N V N %�/ �"' � NN S9NNNNNNN NNN .- J ® NpN NNNN NNNNN NN stp.e m.. t V T co T O OI n `f t0 Y) m h M N m V V O O ` Y ,ii' t0 Y N VI r) N N V Ni D) O M M ` .O r 0 0 0 r r r r O M '5 m N M M N '? N 0 0 ..- 0 m • 2 "O it r IV N N N N N N M M M N X . NNNN N N N• N• N• N V N 0 ai N69 NNNNNNNNNNN .. ...,,/' N NNNNNNNNNNt`l � O U ;-:-(,--4,F41 S O a` ¢ ,•: F is c ) y •7 m n m O o r N M V N m n w 7 n m m o r N M V Y) m n QW, +may % mm C)00) 0mmmmmm .S. m0,0000 000) K �e r w W �b'4Si /:' a f~ , a N m a O m OI ca m n .- r m P m O N O M'— 'ii rig N O O .0 N m V N n t0 n N 0 ? l; N IO ri m r O N < m N C) O c4 --'w. V m N N O N Ol t0 r N N N r M .1! tit I NN MMNMMMMbbbrM ((' NNNN NNMNNMN W to � NN tr)NNNNNNNNNM 4h N� NN NN69N NNNNN U h 5 K n 2 - 'N 0 o. a II r b 7,; .) N• 5Sf irt, m A 3 :30 T � ,',-.{,;,%1 ( :, I Z C d 2w . ` Ill f Otp nID NOl nn O n mO I"`-- n V OrN IO OOOl hNmr g O O O •`1L' '(i Cr N n W N 0> h O N n N 0 M q{Tt c :::.4 .7 ) n r Ol t- m n O OJ N N O N O .9 T r N N M n N N N N M 'O V n N n i°- Q� N N N N N N NNNN O W '�Y NN NNNNNVIttQ%NWC) s� NN NNNNNNNNNNN ' w n' I - 2aa s , r S — QO 7 / 5 ON Nti Q)!rm CV (C! COCOON . 4'a' flN NNal rmQ °m NN ,N m Jul o • !Vi-- N N M M N N N N t7 P M f N C) ' N N r N r N r N N N (VIN ,p 0 .1 N N N N N N N N N N tn., .- -t J. N N NNNNNNNNNNN n �= O 1. 0 A 0m 1Ot00nm ONOmOOr ) q r I nm 21,;-; 530• 22s,Nnm m00'O Ol l„ 11 zz(��, O r N n t 0 V O n O e Neff Q nQ l N N 0 N N N N N N r U HN HNN�W H�19 ViNMeipin NN NNNNNNNNNNN' cP Cal. N „ Ez L m n m O) O r N f)V in co n w (rA m n m Ol O r N M C N m n w a m m m m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (- '( m m m m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I(o 2 3 ... 00 0000 00000 W a p, Y... 00 0000 0000 00 a t �nl W .."* ...1 " w 3 , Vic,,. S •-rr}eq > 5 T < Tip, 0 00 or N ni m 2 N 0 O 0 o . Z ig 5.82 ADDENDUM..V-A, 1999 AGRICULTURAL PRICES, RENTAL RATES AND EXPENSES COMMODITY PRICES The agricultural commodity prices reported are for the ten-year period 1988-1997. Udepttl;let9teglelitYiPitesaexpenses4ancIDAUktrentaratpsiarettequirethby.ali Coloradotcounties io►1&the'1,999:reappraisal yeamand for4.the=fdlloWingtintervening year./ Previously published price lists have been reduced to the most typical crops grown in the state."Tht a ommodity;prices have been reviewed byrthe,Statutory Advisory, Committee3andapproved.`by the State Board of Equalization:pursuantito 39-2-131 and 39-9-103(10), C.R.S. Average Crops Commodity Price All Hay $ 83.23 ton Barley (feed) $ _ 8 bushel Corn (grain) $ . I Sorghum (grain) $ -2.21 bushel Wheal: (all) $ 3.30 bushel AUM RENTAL RATES AND AGRICULTURAL EXPENSES The following AUM rental and agricultural expense items are researched by the Division, and must be used in the valuation of agricultural lands. The expense for each item listed is an average of the ten year period (1988-1997). Irrigated Land Alfalfa seed expense (per acre) c:_=$_7.90-- Landlord baling expense (per ton) $ 5.88 Fence expense (per acre) $ 1.53 15-DIVISION-AS PUB ARL VOL 3 1-89 Revised 1-99 1999 AG2 GIVEN STATE AVERAGES Commodity: Hay $83.23 Expenses: Hay Seed $7.90 Baling. $5.88 Fencing $1.53 Cap Rate: 13% Assessment Rate: 29% WELD COUNTY ASSESSOR PROPERTY PROFILE Parcel#: 095730000009 Account#: R1634186 MH Seq#: MH Space: Appr Year: Levy: 78.544 #of Bldgs: 0 Active On: 7/19/99 Tax Dist: 0507 Map #: 2183 LEA: InactiveOn: Assign To: JKH Initials: MFS Acct Type: Agricultural Last Updated: 7/19/99 Owner's Name and Address: Property Address: PKAMMERZELL JACOB TRUST& ,IACOB JR AKA Street: 6560 52.25 CR JAKE City: WELD 25090 WELD CO RD 15 JOHNSTOWN CO 80534 i L Business/Complex: Sales Summary Legal Description _ 22647 S25E4 30 5 67(5R)%6560 WCR 52 1/4% Land Valuation Summary - Abst Unit of Number Of Value Per Assmt *Assessed Land Type Ag Code Code Measure Units Unit Actual Value Percent Value •-Agricultural N II 4117 Acres 40 $528.54 $21,142 29.00% $6,131 ,Agricultural M III 4117 Acres 8 $386.92 $3,095 29.00% $898 Agricultural C VII 4147 Acres 10 $6.58 $66 29.00% $19 Agricultural M IV 4117 Acres 17 $239.15 $4,066 29.00% $1,179 75 4O ,3$8.31 $8,230.00 i Land Subtotal: —-- ---�-- --Buildings Valuation Summary Abst Actual Assmt *Assessed Bldg # Property Type Code Occupancy Value Percent Value $17,371 0,0974 $1,692 1 Residential 427? 101 -Single Family Res. 0 29 $319 2 Out Building 4279 404-Shed - Utility $1,099 Improvements Subtotal: $18,470.00 $2,010.00 Total Property Value $46,838 $10,240 *Approximate Assessed Value Page 1 of 4 Tuesday, July 20, 1999 ti j fi j 4 PIS c 'ri L i ,,l tla i'� ,�,;,., it 7< 4117 T 3rt� HIP I �A e � .: &a" ,, ' ,....u..n:.,�.,a<.a lu- IrI , a i] /rl'H r' L::S!i I /,Hi- ,r9 3cirl / ,Ii.i5' . : ', Y I 28,3031 8,210 I''d ; (Acres Square Feet Units O/G Wells O/G Production 65.000 I 0 Insert lY] Lin Ua/y l`4uvJ r)u'r,Ddr., Months I Update � w"'a Delete r r Lt is End J:rrs r of, c I Clear Exit LASSC TATU ACTVAL SSESSVA ACRES SQFT I UNITS I L 41171A 28303I 8210 0 4147�A T - - �. Class Code r4277'A — 17371 - _ 1690 20 10. 1108 (.) Sequence 544 —.. 4279A 1099 320 O Tax Area L d 3 4 A1 T 1P�.' n tIA �1� r'p,oti^it� r6CiIrT r 1 z, �I iµn ['7 � 112(1. 1 ": Y i m�L..uXR..wvL'.ua.w.ae .J6��.'..&.s�.e..,.....,...-2,4;1,-1`>5LdSik. I 73r# ,m 1i1Il i t r I..; *9 l;{1 RecordCCount I I WELD COUNTY ASSESSOR PROPERTY PROFILE Parcel#: 095730000009 Account#: R1634186 MH Seq#: MH Space: Appr Year: .'W98 c Levy: 78.544 #of Bldgs: 2 Active On: 8/21/97 9:45:3 Tax Dist: 0507 Map#: 2183 LEA: InactiveOn: Assign To: JKH Initials: SQL Acct Type: Agricultural Last Updated: 8/21/97 9:45:3 Owner's Name and Address: Property Address: 1 'KAMMERZELL JACOB TRUST& JACOB JR AKA I[-Street: 6560 52.25 CR JAKE City: WELD 25090 WELD CO RD 15 JOHNSTOWN CO 80534 Business/Complex: Sales Summary Legal Description 22647 S2SE4 30 5 67(5R)%6560 WCR 52 1/4% Land Valuation Summary Abst Unit of Number Of Value Per Assmt *Assessed Land Type Ag Code Code Measure Units Unit Actual Value Percent Value Agricultural M IV 4117 Acres 17 $204.54 $3,477 29.00% $1,008 Agricultural - C VII 4147 Acres 10 $6.86 $69 29.00% $20 Agricultural M III 4117 Acres 8 $326.15 $2,609 29.00% $757 Agricultural N II 4117 Acres 40 $442.23 $17,689 29.00% $5,130 I Land Subtotal: 75 t' +1E $6,920.00 Buildings Valuation Summary Abst Actual Assmt *Assessed Bldg# Property Type Code Occupancy Value Percent Value 1 Residential 4277 101 - Single Family Res. $17,371 0.0974 $1,692 2 Out Building 4279 404- Shed - Utility $1,099 0.29 $319 I Improvements Subtotal: $18,470.00 $2,010.00 Total Property Value $42,314 $8,930 'Approximate Assessed Value Tuesday, July 20, 1999 Page 1 of 4 alt4117 4 II 7 rinifrex+k",i t". H 4•K ix; .,� . 1 }}6� - 5 £c'� Y 23,776 6,900 a: (Acres Square Feet Units O/G Wells O/G Production Correction? - 1 65.000 0 Insert 1§love.Jn Dac lhlova Ous Ur Noa hs""` Update aJ r� i Delete LIt'r,Leas anti DEr r ,Df. __— Clear Exit LASSC TATU ACNAL SSESSVA ACRES I SQFT UNITS H 4117 A 237761 6900 6T 0 IL 4147 IA C9-] 20 101 0 1 Class Code 4277 A 17371 1690 11081- _ - f� Sequence 4279 A 1099. 320 1 1164 T --. . _ — - -- O Tax Area 15<Trifit —irivFinic.274 'L4 $, 3'i. .`tn.,. .11,4,,, ,i! 11,4 , _ sf �Yny..i'' I i.Z£ t .,� }4.1 ��m.v i@� �,Y 5 e. u.. {y 'uequN4uexi+i.+"-.. 17.).'_ �F UA9c t. d $ ri e{w 'kYi . 4 Y r 1 LA 1 1 i4H }0 ggL3 ,µ t I -i Record Count II ^L� cip N cv W v+ T n G — N ¢ten qN U CD N N N ON .. �...... ON v ¢ j� 'i e M U N CD o I • Cl) M-O N o - U z 3 a O N S '1 'N b'_ xd " w wt w` t r — 'p ate ' • °a ,e +. tt. { d 91i if Y1 e 1 gg.g_ ' [LI! 1 Z Q ,i a"m &�r� ,... 4pry �•..i? '!:',,,g? H e, 2 .Af01- I„ t ., ark " u i :d ✓ yf x . r� W:v z le ,n Milo ...`4,4•,.. 29/' `>i Y, •I 8 s I ✓ 2�" °l r i M0 f4 x + I aryu< a c "— v e ti� .. ,.-'4.,,.,.. � J .r.i w ! Yx' i .,'tij R :�bt ',* f �I .. � �i —fi:�y°"/ ,� � dj,�y . ,e � x �,av+ '.i ., � ode .tit,,, ��. � r / L6Lrrf ',g9 ++p d �ey�/.srs.s m I q ( ��yy , it . YC { 7/11.11,444' .,.. ° � t, w w m Tx 7: ` y fir t I ay): f d {r , ik': SSter,.',';'),;,1L4,? );,...;,,20..,,„4,7X-.L.,,,,,—ter;,.- ) ��µ Mr • n'•a �•firvpr a �"„a'dw" >a Y` �xC •• :*'. i:� �':..iiiiS �I�1�� 1 pp��/ f . . ,, . . ,, „;. ,4 I' ' ' ✓ r'""' -..-.--"4e,R;HT,,,,,,,,----",itt,.. r : .g. ,. :1!r "Ai t/..;';:Ac'' „0.:, '' '''Iric , . '',;".'44‘,.'f.,„. 8 . . N ,.ri�f Ty� ads Mr.Y x, A'Sg �.'. "� e�: v 1 V ,, '� b 4�.1 ' A 2:,tis Val-5.1,',4;7"./ ��1 ^ #qq$ 11i � , ✓ X655 b .gym" / _»k d t°, , d� o- {y�h rP �" , � fi�'� n7✓� # tL g_ �s t� * a 1, -,,,,4-,;:',..k..;*`aA s x. ak• .24-6..f. ' r 4,414' In J� "F1 N J. 41 A... J �y n etr� erXi I a� �f f � �t nkV, 3 t.r 'f ,..1.' '� ., e. � 'cv°�' ,. r ,G _ �r! .,fil ."1 s^ F:f( il range site. 53—Otero sandy loam, 5 to 9 percent slopes. This is a deep, well drained soil o plains at elevations of 4,700 to I�5,250 feet. It formed in mixed outwash and eolian RVEY deposits. Included in mapping are small areas of soils that Rapid expansion of Greeley and the surrounding are: have sandstone and shale. within a depth of 60 inches. has resulted in urbanization of much of this Otero soil Typically the surface _ayer is brown sandy loam about This soil has excellent potential for urban and recrea 10 inches thick. The underlying material to a depth of 60 tional development. The primary limiting feature is thi inches is pale brown calcareous fine sandy loam. moderately rapid permeability in the substratum, whic] Permeability is rapid. Available water capacity is causes a hazard of ground water contamination fron moderate. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or sewage lagoons. There are additional costs in sit more. Surface runoff is medium to rapid, and the erosion preparation because of slope. Lawns, shrubs, and tree hazard is low. grow well. Capability subclass Die irrigated, VIe north This soil is suited to limited cropping. Intensive rigated; Sandy Plains range site. cropping is hazardous because of erosion. The cropping 54—Paoli loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes. This is a deel system should be limited to such close grown crops as al- well drained soil on terraces at elevations of 4,700 to 5,25 falfa, wheat, and barley. This soil also is suited to ir- feet. It formed in alluvial deposits. Included in mappin. rigated pasture. A suitable cropping system is 3 to 4 are small areas of soils that have a loamy sand surfac years of alfalfa followed by 2 years of corn and small layer. grain and alfalfa seeded with a nurse crop. Typically the surface layer is grayish brown loam an Closely spaced contour ditches or sprinklers can be fine sandy loam about 25 inches thick. The underlyin used in irrigating close grown crops. Contour furrows or material to a depth of 60 inches is light brownish gra sprinklers should be used for new crops. Applications of fine sandy loam. nitrogen and phosphorus help in maintaining good produc- Permeability is moderate. Available water capacity i tion. high. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or mon The potential native vegetation on this range site is Surface runoff is very slow, and the erosion hazard is lov dominated by sand bluestem, sand reedgrass, and blue This soil is used almost entirely for irrigated crops. I grama. Needleandthre ad, switchgrass, sideoats grama, is suited to all crops commonly grown in the area, incluc and western wheatgrass are also prominent. Potential ing corn, sugar beets, beans, alfalfa, small grain, potatoe production ranges from 2,200 pounds per acre in favora- and onions. An example of a suitable cropping system is ble years to 1,800 pounds in unfavorable years. As range to 4 years of alfalfa followed by corn, corn for silag condition deteriorates, the sand bluestem, sand reedgrass, sugar beets, small grain, or beans. Such characteristics a and switchgrass adsagedecrease and blue grama, sand dropseed, the rapidly permeable substratum slightly restrict soft and sand sage increase. Annual weeds and grasses invade crops. the site as range condition becomes poorer. All methods of irrigation are suitable, but furrow i.s Management of vegetation on this soil should be based ngation is the most common. Proper irrigation watf on taking half and leaving half of the total annual produc- management is essential Barnyard manure and comme tion. Seeding is desirable if the range is in poor condition. al fertilizer are needed for top yields. Sand bluestem, sand reedgrass, switchgrass, sideoats Windbreaks and environmental plantings are general grama, blue grama, pubescent Tass, and crested suited to this soil. Soil blowing, the principal hazard i should heatgrass are suitable for seeding. The grass selected establishing trees and shrub:'., can be controlled by cv se meet the clean. firml resorghum quirements s uo bllivestock. It can tivating only in the tree row and by leaving a strip be seeded into a clean. eb d. Seed or it can ibn vegetation between the rows. Supplemental irrigatic drilled n into a firm most successful.c seedbed. Seeding early in may be needed at the time of planting and during di spring has proven Windbreaks and environmental plantings are generally periods. Trees that are best suited and have good surviv suited to this soil. Soil blowing, the principal hazard in are Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern redcedar, ponderot establishing trees and shrubs, can be controlled by cul- pine, Siberian elm, Russian-olive, and hackberry. TI tivating only in the tree row and by leaving a strip of shrubs best suited are skunkbush sumac, lilac, and Sibei vegetation between ;he rows. Supplemental irrigation an peashrub. Wildlife is an important secondary use of this soil. TI may be needed at the time of planting and during dry cropland areas provide favorable habitat for ring-necke periods. Trees that are best , eastern sd and have ar,go p survival Pheasant and mourning dove. Many nongame species c: are Rocky Mountain juniper, arnd hackberry.ponderosa be attracted by establishing areas for nesting and escal pine, Siberian elm, skunkbush sumac,and The cover. For pheasants, undisturbed nesting cover is esse sh an rubs best suited are skunkbush lilac, and Siberi- tial and should be included in plans for habitat develo peashrub. Wildlife is an important secondary use of this soil. meet, especially in areas of ir.tensive agriculture. Ring-necked pheasant, mourning dove, and many non- In areas protected from flooding, this soil has go' game species can be attracted by establishing areas for potential for urban and recreational development. T nesting and escape cover. For pheasants, undisturbed chief limiting feature is the rapid permeability in the su nesting cover is essential and should be included in plans stratum, which causes a hazard of ground water co for habitat development, especially in areas of intensive f r sewage fag orshe Road a desf igst potenti agriculture. modified to compensate WELD COUNTY, COLO: 'IL SURVEY ing tivating only in the tree row and by leaving a strip of and switchgrass decrease and blue grama, sand dropseed, and sand sage increase. Annual weeds and grasses invade ush vegetation between the rows. Supplemental irrigation : the site as range condition becomes poorer. ;e. may be needed at the time of planting and during dry t-P Management of vegetation an this soil should be based veil periods. Trees that are best suited and have good survival on taking half and leaving half of the total annual produc- ter are Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern redcedar, ponderosa tion. Seeding is desirable if the range is in poor condition. ees pine, Siberian elm, Russian,-olive, and hackberry. The r Sand bluestem, sand reedgrass, switchgrass, sideoats be shrubs best suited are skunkbush sumac, lilac, and Siberi- i blue grama, pubescent wheatgrass, and crested led an peashrub. ,.. .. eat ass are suitable for seeding. The grass selected led Wildlife is an important secondary use of this soil. should meetthe seasonal requirements of livestock. It can we Ring-necked pheasant, mourning dove, and many non- I be seeded into a clean, firm stubble, or it can be drilled ern game species can be attracted by establishing areas for into a firm prepared seedbed. Seeding early in spring has ubs nesting and escape cover. For pheasants, undisturbed proven most successful. ian nesting cover is essential and should be included in plans .� �. Windbreaks and environmental plantings are generally for habitat development, especially in areas of intensive suited to this soil. Soil blowing, the principal hazard in The agriculture. establishing trees and shrubs, can be controlled by mil- ted Rapid expansion of Greeley and the surrounding area 3€ tivating only in the tree row and by leaving a strip of mn has resulted in urbanization of much of this Otero soil. ? vegetation between the rows. Supplemental irrigation ipe This soil has excellent potential for urban and recrea- . , may be needed at the time of planting and during dry en- tional development. The only limiting feature is the '" periods. Trees that are best suited and have good survival op- moderately rapid permeability in the substratum, which ym"i: are Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern redcedar, ponderosa ge- causes a hazard of ground water contamination from -.i't pine, Siberian elm, Russian-olive, and hackberry. The be sewage lagoons. Lawns, shrubs, and trees grow well. '&;. shrubs best suited are skunkbush sumac, lilac, and Siberi- es, Capability subclass IIs irrigated. i an peashrub. d. 51—Otero sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes. This is a i. Wildlife is an important secondary use of this soil ur- deep, well drained soil on plains at elevations of 4,700 to m Ring-necked pheasant, mourning dove, and many non- ?id 5,250 feet. It formed in mixed outwash and eolian " game species can be attracted by establishing areas for of deposits. Included in mapping are small areas of soils that l'0 nesting and escape cover. For pheasants, undisturbec for have loam and clay loam underlying material: " nesting cover is essential and should be included in plan: er. Typically the surface layer is brown sandy loam about ;1E for habitat development, especially in areas of intensivE ep- 12 inches thick. The underlying material to a depth of 60 1;. agriculture. inches is pale brown calcareous fine sandy loam. ran Rapid expansion of Greeley and the surrounding are: a a Permeability is rapid. Available water capacity is A has resulted in urbanization of much of this Otero soil of moderate. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or - r, This soil has excellent potential for urban and recrea an more. Surface runoff is slow, and the erosion hazard is ? ': tional development. The only limiting feature is th, gat low. git fi% moderately rapid permeability in the substratum, whicl This soil is used almost entirely for irrigated crops. It '1:l causes a hazard of ground water contamination fron ut is suited to all crops commonly grown in the area. Land °5 sewage lagoons. Lawns, shrubs, and trees row wel. 60 leveling, ditch lining, and installing pipelines may be 4`4 Capability subclass IIIe irrigated, IVe nonirrigated needed for proper water application. ' , Sandy Plains range site. is All methods of irrigation are suitable, but furrow ir- •`M 52—Otero sandy loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes. 'Chia is or rigation is the most common. Barnyard manure and com- j deep, well drained soil on plains at elevations of 4,700 t is mercial fertilizer are needed for top yields. 0 il 5250 feet. It formed in mixed outwash and eolia: In nonirrigated areas this soil is suited to winter wheat, „r deposits. Included in mapping are small areas of soils tha It barley, and sorghum. Most of the acreage is planted to ,1 have loam and clay loam underlying material. Also it d- winter wheat. The predicted average yield is 28 bushels eluded are small areas of soils that have sandstone an m, per acre. The soil is summer allowed in alternate years shale within a depth of 60 inches. 3 to allow moisture accumulation. Generally precipitaiton is 1 Typically the surface layer of this Otero soil is brow e, too low for beneficial use of fertilizer. ii sandy loam about 10 inches thick. The underlying matern c- Stubble mulch farming, striperopping, and minimum til- 4 to a depth of 60 inches is pale brown calcareous fin le lage are needed to control water erosion. Terracing also i.14- sandy loam. may be needed to control water erosion. : Permeability is rapid. Available water capacity i r- The potential native vegetation on this range site is 'Ca' moderate. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches c ?r dominated by sand bluestem, sand reedgrass, and blue li. more. Surface runoff is medium, and the erosion hazard r- grama. Needleandthread, switchgrass, sideoats grama, 4!. low. wheatgrass are pr ominent.western also Potential r.4J , This soil is used almost entirely for irrigated crops. y production ranges from 2,200 pounds per acre in favora- ' is suited to the crops commonly grown in the are n bie years to 1,800 pounds in unfavorable years. As range t. Perennial grasses and alfalfa or close growing crol 1- condition deteriorates, the sand bluestem, sand reedgrass, t.: el 11 WELD COUNTY, COLO• ft ercent of the unit. Aquents, which have a lighter These are deep, poorly drained soils that formed in i=N. recent alluvium. No one pedon is typical. Commonly the ed surface layer, make up about 35 percent. About 5 F soils have a mottled, mildly to moderately alkaline loamy ent is Aquepts and d sandy loam. or clayey surface layer and underlying material that ex- iese are deep, poorly drained soils that formed in of 60 inches or more. In nt alluvium. No one pedon is typical. Commonly the ry tends gleyed depth the underlying material.places they have have a mottled, mildly alkaline to moderately al- LI, Most of the acreage is subject to excessive runoff. The ae loamy or clayey surface layer and underlying ig, and during ' water table is at or near the surface in spring erial and are underlain by sand or sand and gravel the eak of the irrigation season. un 48 inches. In places they have a gleyed layer in the These soils are used for rangeland and wildlife habitat erlying f material. Some small areas are irrigated pasture.los le i of the acreage is subject to flooding. The water M The potential native vegetation is dominated b3 is at or near the surface in spring and recedeslla switchgrass, prairie cordgrass, saltgrass, alkali sacaton is deep as 48 inches late in fall in some years. :is 'hese soils are used for rangeland and wildlife habitat. 's; big ret wheatUeass, sedge,stem, aa darush. Cattails and western tbullrushegrov gr ne small areas have been reclaimed by major drainage the swampy spots associated with these range sites leveling and are native efor irrigated domcropsinated ! Potential production ranges from 4,000 pounds per acre h at potential native andwestern vegetation is dominated alby alkali favorable years to 3,000 pounds in unfavorable years. A aton,rush, grass, western ware alsss. Saltgrast. 15_.. tion drops, and salt ass, sedge, and rue. (ge, and alkali bluegrass are also prominent. range condition deteriorates, the tall and mid grasse :ential production ranges from 3,00C pounds per acre in increase. Thdecrease, e farming and irrigation in adjacent areas ha orable years to 2,000 pounds in unfavorable years. As n increased the amount of salts on much of the acreage. ige condition deteriorates, the switchgrass,ean alkali ' Management of vegetation on this soil should be base Ige, and rush incre wheatgrass decrease and saltgrass, on taking half and leaving half of the total annual produc ige, and increase. tion. Switchgrass, big bluestem, indiangrass, wester Management of vegetation should be based on taking wheat ass, pubescent wheatgrass, intermediate whea l if and leaving half of the total annual production. Seed- grass, tall w ass, and tall fescue are suitable fc is difficult ir costly because m numerous tillage prac-. seedin The plants selected should met the seaason es are , western t to eliminate the saltgrass sod. requirements of livestock. For successful seeding, fir ritchgrass, we are suitable alkali sacaton, tall s t prepared seedbed is needed. A grass drill should be use ceatgrase and tall fescue are rmfor seeding. They Seeding early in spring has proven most successful. Ti n be seeded into a clean, firm seedbed. Seedbed lage is needed to eliminate the undesirable vegetation. minate eparaotn usually requires more than 1 year to 1 Wetland wildlife, especially waterfowl, utilize this uni The wetland plants provide nesting and protective cove the saltgrass sod. A grass drill should be used. irrigated croplan Wetland•ed early in l spring has proven most successful. as well as some food. The nearby wildlife, especially waterfowl, utilize this unit. ti where wildlife obtain much of their food and find prote to wetland plants provide nesting and protective cover, well as some food. The nearby irrigated cropland, +E tive cover, makes this unit valuable to both wetland ar ,3Y enland wildlife. here wildlife obtain much of their food and find protec- :, openland wildlife, especially pheasant, use this unit f ,re cover, makes this unit valuable to both wetland andQi Open land cover and nesting. Deer find excellent cover in son ienland wildlife. " areas. These valuable wildlife areas should be protect, seer nd wildlife, especially pheasant, use this unit for ar and nesting. Deer find excellent cover in some O. from fire and fenced to prevent encroachment ai " overuse by livestock. They should not be drained. CaI seas. bility subclass VIw; Aquolls n Salt Meadow range si These valuable wildlife areas should be protected from [fd re and fenced to prevent encroachment and overuse by _SO Aquepts in Wet Meadow range site. 5—Ascalon sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes. This v . They should not be drained. a deep, well drained soil on uplands at elevations of 4,6 ravel. Capability subclass VIw; Salt Meadow range site. These soils have good potential as a source of sand and _j to 5,200 feet. It formed in alluvium. Included in mappi small areas of rock outcrop. 4—Aquolls and Aquepts, flooded. This nearly level areT icall the surface layer is brown sandy loam abc cap unit is in depressions in smooth plains and along the 10 inches thick. The subsoil is pale brown and yellow: ottoms of natural drainageways throughout the survey brown sandy clay loam about 15 inches thick. The si rea. Aquolls, which have a dark colored surface layer, cake up about 55 percent of the unit. Aquepts, which stratum to a depth of 60 inches is calcareous fine san loam. ave a lighter colored surface layer, make up about 25 � ' permeability is moderate. Available water capacity ercent. About 20 percent is soils that are well drained high. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or mo hend soils that have sandstone or shale within 48 inches of Surface runoff is slow, and the erosion hazard is low. he surface. 32 SOIL SURVEY are Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern redcedar, ponderosa ble years to 1,800 pounds in unfavorable years. As range pine, Siberian elm, Russian-olive, and hackberry. The condition deteriorates, the sand bluestem, sand reedgrass, shrubs best suited are skunkbush sumac, lilac, and Siberi- and switchgrass decrease and blue grama, sand dropseed, an peashrub. and sand sage increase. Annual weeds and grasses invade Wildlife is an important secondary use of this soil. The the site as range condition becomes poorer. cropland areas provide favorable habitat for ring-necked Management of vegetation on this soil should be based pheasant and mourning dove. Many nongame species can on taking half and leaving half of the total annual produc- be attracted by establishing areas for nesting and escape tion. Seeding is desirable if the range is in poor condition. cover. For pheasants, undisturbed nesting cover is essen- Sand bluestem, sand reedgrass, switchgrass, sideoats tial and should be included in plans for habitat develop- grama, blue grama, and pubescent wheatgrass are suita- ment, especially in areas of intensive agriculture. ble for seeding. The grass selected should meet the Rapid expansion of Greeley and the surrounding area seasonal requirements of livestock. It can be seeded into has resulted in urbanization of much of this Olney soil. a clean, firm sorghum stubble, or it can be drilled into a This soil has good potential for urban and recreational firm prepared seedbed. Seeding early in spring has development. The only limiting feature is the moderately proven most successful. rapid permeability in the substratum, which causes a Windbreaks and environmental plantings are generally hazard of ground water contamination from sewage suited to this soil. Soil blowing, the principal hazard in lagoons. Lawns, shrubs, and trees grow well. Capability establishing trees and shrubs, can be controlled by cul- class I irrigated. tivating only in the tree row and by leaving a strip of 47—Olney fine sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes. vegetation between the rows. Supplemental irrigation This is a deep, well drained soil on plains at elevations of may be needed at the time of planting and during dry 4,600 to 5,200 feet. It formed in mixed outwash deposits. periods. Trees that are best suited and have good survival Included in mapping are small areas of soils that have a are Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern redcedar, ponderosa dark surface layer. Sorge small leveled areas are also in- pine, Siberian elm, Russian-olive, and hackberry. The eluded. shrubs best suited are skunkbush sumac, lilac, and Siberi- Typically the surface layer of this Olney soil is grayish an peashrub. brown fine sandy loam about 10 inches thick. The subsoil Wildlife is an important secondary use of this soil. The is yellowish brown and very pale brown sandy clay loam cropland areas provide favorable habitat for ring-necked about 14 inches thick. The substratum to a depth of 60 pheasant and mourning dove. Many nongame species can inches is very pale brown, calcareous fine sandy loam. be attracted by establishing areas for nesting and escape Permeability and available water capacity are cover. For pheasants, undisturbed nesting cover is essen- moderate. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or tial and should be included in plans for habitat develop- more. Surface runoff is medium, and the erosion hazard is ment, especially in areas of intensive agriculture. Range- low land wildlife, for example, the pronghorn antelope, can be In irrigated areas this soil is suited to all crops com- attracted by developing livestock watering facilities, monly grown in the area, including corn, sugar beets, managing livestock grazing, and reseeding where needed. beans, alfalfa, small grain, potatoes, and onions. An exam- Rapid expansion of Greeley and the surrounding area ple of a suitable cropping system is 3 to 4 years of alfalfa has resulted in urbanization of much of the Olney soil. followed by corn, corn for silage, sugar beets, small grain, This soil has good potential for urban and recreational or beans. Land leveling, ditch lining, and installing development. The only limiting feature is the moderately pipelines may be needed for proper water application. All rapid permeability in the substratum, which causes a methods of irrigation are suitable, but furrow irrigation is hazard of ground water contamination from sewage the most common. Barnyard manure and commercial fer- lagoons. Lawns, shrubs, and trees grow well. Capability tilizer are needed for top yields. subclass Ile irrigated, IVe nonirrigated; Sandy Plains In nonirrigated areas this soil is suited to winter wheat, range site. barley, and sorghum. Most of the acreage is planted to 48—Olney fine sandy loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes. winter wheat. The predicted average yield is 28 bushels This is a deep, well drained soil on plains at elevations of per acre. The soil is summer fallowed in alternate years 4,600 to 5,200 feet. It formed in mixed outwash deposits. to allow moisture accumulation. Generally precipitation is Included in mapping are small areas of soils that have a too low for beneficial use of fertilizer. dark surface layer and small areas of soils that have Stubble mulch farming, striperopping, and minimum til- sandstone and shale within a depth of 60 inches. lage are needed to cortrol soil blowing and water erosion. Typically the surface layer of this Olney soil is grayish Terracing also may be needed to control water erosion. brown fine sandy clay loam about 8 inches thick. The sub- The potential native vegetation on this range site is soil is yellowish brown and very pale brown fine sandy dominated by sand bluestem, sand reedgrass, and blue loam about 12 inches thick. The substratum to a depth of grama. Needleandthrsad, switchgrass, sideoats grama, 60 inches is very pale brown, calcareous fine sandy loam. and western wheatgrass are also prominent. Potential Permeability and available water capacity are production ranges from 2,200 pounds per acre in favora- moderate. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or construction is the limited capacity of this soil to support a load. Septic tank absorption fields function properly, but community sewage systems should be provided if the population density increases. Because of the permeability of the substratum, sewage lagoons must be sealed. Lawns, shrubs, and trees grow well. Capability subclass IIe irrigated, IVe nonirrigated; Loamy Plains range site. 33—Kim loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes. This is a deep, well drained soil on plains and alluvial fans at elevations of 4,900 to 5,250 feet. It formed in mixed eolian deposits and parent sediment from a wide variety of bedrock. In- cluded in mapping are small areas of soils that have loamy sand underlying material. Typically the surface layer is brown and pale brown loam about 10 inches thick. The upper 28 inches of the un- derlying material is pale brown loam. The lower part to a depth of 60 inches is pale brown fine sandy loam. Permeability is moderate. Available water capacity is high. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Surface runoff is medium, and the erosion hazard is moderate. In irrigated areas this soil is suited to crops commonly grown in the area. Perennial grasses and alfalfa or close grown crops should be grown at least 50 percent of the time. Contour ditches and corrugations can be used in ir- rigating close grown crops and pasture. Furrows, contour furrows, and cross slope furrows are suitable for row crops. Sprinkler irrigation is also suggested. Keeping til- lage to a minimum and utilizing crop residue help to con- trol erosion. Maintaining fertility is important. Crops respond to applications of phosphorus and nitrogen. In nonirrigated areas this soil is suited to winter wheat, barley, and sorghum. Most of the acreage is planted to winter wheat. The predicted average yield is 28 bushels per acre. The soil is summer fallowed in alternate years to allow moisture accumulation. Generally precipitation is too low for beneficial use of fertilizer. Stubble mulch farming, striperopping, and minimum til- lage are needed to control soil blowing and water erosion. Terracing also may be needed to control water erosion. The potential native vegetation is dominated by blue grama. Several mid grasses, such as western wheatgrass and needleandthread, are also present. Potential produc- tion ranges from 1,600 pounds per acre in favorable years to 1,000 pounds in unfavorable years. As range condition deteriorates, the mid grasses decrease; blue grama, buf- falograss, snakeweed, yucca, and fringed sage increase; and forage production drops. Undesirable weeds and an- nuals invade the site as range condition becomes poorer. Management of vegetation on this soil should be based on taking half and leaving half of the total annual produc- tion. Seeding is desirable if the range is in poor condition. Sideoats grama, little bluestem, western wheatgrass, blue grama, pubescent wheatgrass, and crested wheatgrass are suitable for seeding. The grass selected should meet the seasonal requirements of livestock. It can be seeded into a clean, firm sorghum stubble, or it can be drilled into a firm prepared seedbed. Seeding early in spring has proven most successful. Windbreaks and environmental plantings of trees and shrubs commonly grown in the area are generally well suited to this soil. Cultivation to control competing vegetation should be continued for as many years as possible following planting. Trees that are best suited and have good survival are Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern redcedar, ponderosa pine, Siberian elm, Russian-olive, and hackberry. The shrubs best suited are skunkbush sumac, lilac, Siberian peashrub, and American plum. Wildlife is an important secondary use of this soil. The 1__n _.____ _____.A.. C...,..«..l.l., 1.ni.:+ t fnr rinn_nnnitnrl r �.1 _. r1 ' .e T { r x i1:2-1.%",•1„..k:.''''.,„ 4T ; t ... °1'yI 14T '•N. 1n ` �3�. -k i Prr '' � ysr I1 y �,� +� '^� ..✓ , . AIM r. a'+� �r � t:',..:!:%,..4.4 yay �y ,,mob E t '�l tali t �'g..--*.-;‘,7;;#,...-,. s Sd 5 ,,,,,,,,. ..4,-,..;.,,-, a p' h-0j r s',..-,,,,,- }� i „ r } � f � a. 9C Ark ••••1.�� 9, � �r �,Sd0y r �� t 1 s s '°� y 1-:-••74...q 1r , y. „JO n m. it le ch �� r F ,I r A 11)/t 6 L• .� ..!..,,,.,.4.:,y H. j �Fl��v 4 . Y 1 *' s rv;v Y� x. , `� ' { Pyyy1u ],..,••1:44.-,*,.:-"• •6Fra ` Y r • . ` q i" --t----,:, Y d Y {.,� P$'�ySI� 'L \ �y/g$�. y �w p s a'y1 Ly .! !T. ;;M T. `r�.'bi gA r1� g.�u+ .Hll' i\\i ']I/ w7 an a �rL Y `I� ,,,.y*�,,, s it .. r., d,.1w 1� �6 - __ �r _ ..,. . . . . ,..„. . .. , 1,_i4 ,, , lea, . fir " ; ';.� • .1i ... .. '.7.:,.,, -- / I ; r `, r.‘,.... F1[ IMW .,.el 41-44: 44 • >~{' A,�,a� tom, r • '-!".v.:0014.- -;,\:: :.. y {' r :'or r '£ ♦'75 Ay µ Ww 91 :',J;;'',,,, HR 5.. • '., ik, [4�r. 4 i f r r , r -t, a �Cr•� '•• i '5� ', left, R 7 ,i"µ^4, ,, r. tp{ ..�.• 4. r ,�g .Z ,r w P 'N" v .,..1,,,...6.7.`.,4 ry .. ; rr i ' • .l r. : i Y --- X 47 ,tt ,4, 06/04/99 07:49ANI Weld County Assessor Page: 1 Account: R1634186 Protest Inquiry Form Review No:92 PROTEST TYPE: IN PERSON BY: OWNER PARC;EL#095730000009 KAMMERZELL JACOB TRUST&JACOB JAKE 25090 WELD CO RD 15 JOHNSTOWN CO 80534 EVENING# DAY# REASON: VALUE TOO HIGH APPOINTMENT: JKH 04-MAY-99 09:00 AM 15 LEGAL DESCRIPTION (MAY BE INCOMPLETE): 22647 S2SE4 30 5 67 (5R) %6560 WCR 52 1/4% NOV ACTUAL LAND 28,369 IMPS 18,470 TOTAL. 46,839 LAND ABSTRACT CODES 4117 4147 IMPS ABSTRAC"CODES 4277 4279 OWNER ACTUAL LAND$ IMPS $ TOTAL$ OWNER COMPS - - - NAME ADDRESS _ ---- -_ -- - -APPR COMPS —._—iCs)APPRAISER JKH _ _ / / SENT I I FINDINGS / /- - OTHER #71-1-7--free 7 s — WRITTEN RESPONSE `UD f1¢-jrif__ LU19 /er_G4 / c/ /r. /S `9/2 477 seem �%�� n u(4-,c �---- -- / rzet " DATE SIG URE SIGNATURE DOES NOT IMPLY AGREEMENT, OR BIND EITHER PARTY, OR AFFECT TAXPAYER'S APPEAL RIGHTS DECISION CODES AV (Y/N/P) CHIEF APPR / / DATA ENTRY6.7 1 , J Hello