Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout991712.tiff RESOLUTION RE: THE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, 1999, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO - DENY PETITIONER'S APPEAL AND AFFIRM ASSESSOR'S VALUE PETITION OF: KAISER HERMAN & HILDA 3312 CARSON AV EVANS, CO 80620-1414 DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: ACCOUNT #: R1247986 PARCEL #: 080310000013 - 13612 E2NW4 10 E 65 (1R) WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, convened as the Board of Equalization for the purpose of adjusting, equalizing, raising or lowering the assessment and valuation of real and personal property within Weld County, fixed and made by the County Assessor for the year 1999, and WHEREAS, said petition has been heard before the County Assessor and due Notice of Determination thereon has been given to the taxpayer(s), and WHEREAS, the taxpayer(s) presented a petition of appeal of the County Assessor's valuation for the year 1999, claiming that the property described in such petition was assessed too high, as more specifically stated in said petition, and WHEREAS, said petitioner being present, and WHEREAS, the Board has made its findings on the evidence, testimony and remonstrances and is now fully informed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, acting as the Weld County Board of Equalization, that the evidence presented at the hearing clearly supported the value placed upon the Petitioner's property, after review by the Weld County Assessor. Such evidence indicated the value was reasonable, equitable, and derived according to the methodologies, percentages, figures and formulas dictated to the Weld County Assessor by law. The assessment and valuation of the Weld County Assessor shall be, and hereby is, affirrned as follows: ACTUAL VALUE AS DETERMINED BY ASSESSOR Land $ 27,590 Improvements OR Personal Property 0 TOTAL ACTUAL VALUE $ 27,590 991712 �� I-� AS0043 RE: BOE - KAISER HERMAN & HILDA Page 2 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a denial of a petition, in whole or in part, by the Board of Equalization may be appealed by selecting one of the following three options; however, said appeal must be filed within 30 days of the denial: 1. Board of Assessment Appeals: You have the right to appeal the County Board of Equalization's (CBOE's) decision to the Board of Assessment Appeals (BAA). Such hearing is the final hearing at which testimony, exhibits, or any other evidence may be introduced. If the decision of the BAA is further appealed to the Court of Appeals, only the record created at the BAA hearing shall be the basis for the Court's decision. No new evidence can be introduced at the Court of Appeals. (Section 39-8-108(10), CRS) Appeals to the BAA must be made on forms furnished by the BAA, and should be mailed or delivered within thirty (30) days of denial by the CBOE to: Board of Assessment Appeals 1313 Sherman Street, Room 523 Denver, CO 80203 Phone: 866-5880 OR 2. District Court: You have the right to appeal the CBOE's decision to the District Court of the county wherein your property is located. New testimony, exhibits or any other evidence may be introduced at the District Court hearing. For filing requirements, please contact your attorney or the Clerk of the District Court. Further appeal of the District Court's decision is made to the Court of Appeals for a review of the record. (Section 39-8-108(1), CRS) OR 3. Binding Arbitration: You have the right to submit your case to arbitration. If you choose this option the arbitrator's decision is final and your right to appeal your current valuation ends. (Section 39-8-108.5, CRS) Selecting the Arbitrator: In order to pursue arbitration, you must notify the CBOE of your intent. You and the CBOE select an arbitrator from the official list of cualified people. If you cannot agree on an arbitrator, the District Court of the county in which the property is located will make the selection. Arbitration Hearing Procedure: Arbitration hearings are held within sixty days from the date the arbitrator is selected. Both you and the CBOE are entitled to participate. The hearings are informal. The arbitrator has the authority to issue subpoenas for witnesses, books, records, documents and other evidence. He also has the power to administer oaths, and all questions of law and fact shall be determined by him. 991712 AS0043 RE: BOE - KAISER HERMAN & HILDA Page 3 The arbitration hearing may be confidential and closed to the public, upon mutual agreement. The arbitrator's written decision must be delivered to both parties personally or by registered mail within ten (10) days of the hearing. Such decision is final and not subject to review. Fees and Expenses: The arbitrator's fees and expenses are agreed upon by you and the CBOE. In the case of residential real property, such fees and expenses cannot exceed $150.00 per case. The arbitrator's fees and expenses, not including counsel fees, are to be paid as provided in the decision. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 22nd day of July, A.D., 1999. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO ATT GL EXCUSED •� � Dal K. Hall, Chair t �t o Board irsi jr �: . Ate/a_ J arbara J. Kirkmeyer, ro-Tem Q Board Georg axter APPRO • ) FORM: AsSs ant County Attorney / �� Glenn Vaad 991712 AS0043 NOTICE OF DENIAL i !_-_i- - OFFICE OF COUNTY ASSESSOR til:( V 1140 1400 E 17th AVE. 13E 12 E2NW4 10 6 65 (110 GREELEH CLEY,CO80631 _ PHONE(970)353-3845,EXT.3650 WIOc COLORADO OWNER: KAISER HERMAN & HILDA KAISER HERMAN & HILDA LOG 1532 3312 CARSON AV PARCEL 080310000013 ACCOUNT R1247986 EVANS, CO 80620-1414 YEAR 1999 05/24/1999 The appraised value of property is based on the appropriate consideration of the approaches to value required by law. The Assessor has determined that your property should be included in the following category(ies): AGRICULTURAL LAND VALUE IS DETERMINED SOLEY BY THE EARNING OR PRODUCTIVE CAPACITY OF THE LAND, CAPITALIZED AT A RATE SET BY LAW. If your concern is the amount of your property tax,local taxing authorities(county,city,fire protection,and other special districts)hold budget hearings in the fall. Please refer to your tax bill or ask your Assessor for a listing of these districts,and plan to attend these budget hearings. The Assessor has carefully studied all available information,giving particular attention to the specifics included on your protest,and has determined the valuation(s)assigned to your property. The reasons for this determination of value are: AG LAND VALUE IS BASED ON PRODUCTION CAPABILITIES OF SOIL TYPES AS INDICATED BY SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE AND IS NOT RELATED TO MARKET VALUE. INCREASE OR DECREASE IS REFLECTIVE OF INCREASE OR DECREASE IN COUNTY AVERAGE PRODUCTION OVER 10 YEAR PERIOD OF TIME. YOUR PROPERTY HAS BEEN ASSESSED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE COLORADO LAW AND INSTRUCTION PUBLISHED BY THE STATE DIVISION OF PROPERTY TAXATION. OTHER PROPERTY SIMILAR IN NATURE HAS BEEN CONSISTENTLY ASSESSED USING THE SAME STATUTORY METHODS. IF YOU FEEL YOUR TAXES ARE TOO HIGH, PLEASE. CONTACT THE SCHOOL DISTRICTS, COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, AND SPECIAL DISTRICTS WHO SET LEVIES. PETITIONER'S ASSESSOR'S VALUATION PROPERTY CLASSIFICATION ESTIMATE OF VALUE ACTUAL VALUE ACTUAL VALUE PRIOR TO REVIEW AFTER REVIEW LAND 27590 27590 IMPS 0 0 TOTALS $ 3 / 71 y-D $ 27590 $ 27590 If you disagree with the Assessor's decision,you have the right to appeal to the County Board of Equalization for further consideration,39-8- 106(1)(a),C.R.S. Please see the back of this form for detailed information on filing your appeal. 05/24/1999 By: Stanley F. Sessions WELD COUNTY ASSESSOR DATE 15-DPT-AR Form PR-207-87/99 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON REVERSE SIDE YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO APPEAL THE ASSESSOR'S DECISION The County Board of Equalization will sit to hear appeals beginning July 1 and continuing through August 5 for real property (land and buildings) and personal property (furnishings, machinery, and equipment) 39-8-104 and 39-8- 107(2), C.R.S. APPEAL PROCEDURES: If you choose to appeal the Assessor's decision, you must appeal to the County Board of Equalization. To preserve your right to appeal, your appeal must be POSTMARKED OR DELIVERED ON OR BEFORE JULY 15 FOR REAL PROPERTY, AND JULY 20 FOR PERSONAL PROPERTY. WELD COUNTY BOARD OF EQUALIZATION 915 10th Street, P.O. Box 758 Greeley, Colorado 80632 Telephone (970)356-4000 Ext. 4225 NOTIFICATION OF HEARING: You will be notified of the time and place set for the hearing of your appeal. COUNTY BOARD OF EOUALIZATION'S DETERMINATION: The County Board of Equalization must make a decision on your appeal and mail you a determination within five business days of that decision. The County Board must conclude their hearings by August 5. TAXPAYER RIGHTS FOR FURTHER APPEALS: If you are not satisfied with the County Board of Equalization's decision you must file within thirty days of the County Board of Equalization's written decision with ONE of the following: Board of Assessment Appeals (BAA): Contact the BAA at 1313 Sherman, Room 315, Denver, Colorado 80203, (303)866-5880. District Court: 9th Avenue and 9th Street, P.O. Box C Greeley, Colorado 80632 Telephone (970) 356-4000, Ext. 4520 Arbitration: WELD COUNTY BOARD OF EQUALIZATION 915 10th Street, P.O. Box 758 Greeley, Colorado 80632 Telephone (970) 356-4000, Ext. 4225 If you do not receive a determination from the County Board of Equalization, you must file an appeal with the Board of Assessment Appeals by September 10. TO PRESERVE YOUR APPEAL RIGHTS, YOU MUST PROVE YOU HAVE FILED A TIMELY APPEAL• THEREFORE WP RECOMMEND ALI CORRESPONDENCE BE MAILED WITH PROOF OF MAILING. PETITION TO THE COUNTY BOARD OF EQUALIZATION In the space below, please explain why you disagree with the Assessor's valuation. IN ACCORDANCE WITH 39- 8-106, C.R.S., YOU MUST S7'ATE YOUR OPINION OF VALUE IN TERMS OF A SPECIFIC DOLLAR AMOUNT. Attach additional documents as necessary. d -'�'Lf`it-ec�Z C:-�1 7,,i�,p ��-i Nt,2J,.. .(_�a i/1-t.-A-/f_AA 4-4--177lA9-11A e: �'c �oc-'1Za 2 t IV_(r, �. J Ytiurif l'lt� C ' , 1, � ,! (off L SIUNAIUKb UI Pb I I I IUNEK^ ��� /4 3 1) Y1 -T- .//6 -1-r-'? \*,,-v .-LittA) y -7 /&c-e -? 4--Et 4:14-rfre-tet.d .«n:60 cep/xi/46.4_4i 4 v Rx-,ase-e6r2 g„-,t-71 .Li.-e& '"YL-ltJ (,) ✓p t-ul a � �LU L17- tak. Cl 1. L /6 07-e/".?- Let_k___ 4.71-7,'" tiu a/ R /T c¢ . U €.a 7 Gtr s 644.A. e 4-,-i <21( 'L yr 2ly. p 4 L�C.t„ L 3 .3 / 2 i COUNTY ASSESSOR , DEPUTY ASSESSOR APPRAISAL REPORT OF AGRICULTURAL LAND FOR County Board of Equalization R HERMAN a HI DA PETITIONER VS. COUNTY ASSESSOR'S OFFICE RESPONDENT Parcel Number: 0803-10-0-00-013 Schedule Number: R1247986 Log Number: 1532 Date: 7/22/99 Time: 10:00am Board: CBOE PREPARED BY Jerry L. Scoby 7/20/99 Signature Date ASSESSOR'S OFFICE STAFF APPRAISER ASSESSOR VALUE $27590 C BOE_AGLAND_010998 Page 1 VALUATION OF AGRICULTURAL LAND The actual value of agricultural lands, exclusive of building improvements thereon, shall be determined by consideration of the earning or productive capacity of such lands during a reasonable period of time, capitalized at a statutory rate of thirteen percent (13%), Colorado Constitution, Article X, Section 3(1)(a), and 39-1-103(5)(a), CRS. The method of appraising agricultural land for ad valorem taxation purposes, based on its earning or productive capacity, involves an "agricultural landlord formula" which has been approved and accepted by the Property Tax Administrator, the State Board of Equalization, the Statutory Advisory Committee to the Property Tax Administrator, county assessors, and members of the agricultural industry. Net income to the landlord is calculated by first determining a commodity price or grazing rental price averaged over the previous ten years multiplied by the appropriate yield based upon soil classification. Multiplyng this gross income by the typical landlord's crop share results in the landlord's gross income. Typical landlord expenses, allowed on a statewide basis, are averaged over the preceding ten-year period and subtracted from the landlord's gross income to arrive at the landlord's net income. This income is capitalized by the statutory capitalization rate of 13 percent to arrive at an indication of value. Commodity prices, AUM rental rates and allowable expenses are researched and recommended by the Statutory Advisory Committee to the Property Tax Administrator. These are reviewed by the State Board of Equalization, and when approved, their use is mandatory. TYPICAL LANDLORD EXPENSES All expenses must be documented and calculated as ten-year averages using the ten calendar years prior to the June 30 appraisal date for a specified level of value. Not all expenses are allowable. The first condition: it must be a typical landlord expense; the second condition: it must be necessary to cultivate a crop; and the third condition: it must be within the following allowable expense categories. For Irrigated Land Alfalfa seed expense (researched and provided by the Division of Property Taxation (DPT)) Landlord baling expense (researched and provided by DPT) Fence expense (researched and provided by DPT) Chemical pesticides, herbicides, fertilizer, and water expenses (researched locally) Corn seed expense for sprinkler irrigated corn only (researched locally) -- For Dry Farm Land Fence expense (researched and provided by DPT) Chemical pesticides, herbicides, and fertilizer expenses (researched locally) CBOE AGLAND_01 0998 Page 2 For Meadow Hay Lard Fence expense (researched and provided by DPT) Water expense (researched and provided by DPT) Fertilizer is a management decision based on the expectation of higher net income. If this is a management decision rather than a typical practice, neither the expense nor the added income is considered. For Grazing Land Fence expense (researched and provided by DPT) Water expense (researched and provided by DPT) ESTABLISH SOIL CLASSIFICATIONS The objective of soil classification is to determine the value of land used for agricultural purposes relative to the land's capability to produce agricultural products. The United States Soil Conservation Service (SCS) has researched and completed modern soil surveys in most of our Colorado counties. The required agricultural land classification program for property taxation purposes is based on the Soil Conservation Service soil survey guidelines. These guidelines include eight general land classifications. BASE CROPS County has established Corn for grain, Wheat and Hay as the base crops. Yields are determined for the base crops selected based on an average of the ten years prior to the specified level of value. The publication, Colorado Agricultural Statistics, is a reliable source of information regarding yields. CONCLUSION The subject property has been physically inspected to verify that the property should have the agricultural designation. The land has been valued according to the consideration of the earning or productive capacity of the land and capitalized at the statutory rate of thirteen percent (13%), Colorado Constitution, Article X, Section 3(1)(a), and 39-1-103(5)(a), CRS. INDICATED VALUE Land 27590 Improvements 0 Total Value $ 27590 CBOE_AGLAND 010998 Page 3 sr I R.67 W ti 66 W. v R 65 W 85 I'r BANK CJ Plea e6 T.O B. koCd4tGn N HBLACKOLLOW r'p(-99,,, CR.RCS/ HOLLOW �4 Ceti e to �'��/�. Each a RESERVOIR �l C n more d Cl g --- tor\ mean!I S dec yF9 m�v noit` 12 14 4 -- I , P� .t, 1p T.7 rv. : R.S41V i 4 � I — m �: -7 -5,, ?t `to �y LAC �� R.63 W. F NEW -EN Or WINDSOR � e'N. /' Eaeon GalmeonTA ,I @ 922] RE$. ` . — i U IV ko'` \ cn I 11 _ I C'E5` �-9 �.a His `� 1 p CANALV. p 1, i n 1. . Windsor CANAL.` m — C 6 392 ug \ Barnnnll �C 1L �� NIO N % PACIFIC C' WEIR G��JJII ► 6 Gin "lea 1,A •OUD6 12 R ! 5 �4M . �� "V�{9 7 34 VEvnnn� y" 12 Henevi_I _�d i �. R g H7 � �� `% sPenua.Village 'wc.,� it e `JC P Sloe S 25 6 712 XI ( 4- ® a?8 1 LATHA y, "C-- �- �� LATHAM �'� 9r, b `N x� xw�tl Jk Q��d 9� 4 ��d � 1 RESERVOIR VOIR x� ' `r a v f :w,b'C�� • 5� e �-sw CP i�'. 5 6a 5 r, r-N I yy, e naz,.lics‘t��:w ¢ l I )+k'+t e� '� a o 41 di 9 Y i �.. x5k® ' 85 9" 'o G• • reu k I t S� 56 it 44,0' 7 til i � e IL 4 nn. =p A a'IIK k yi�y 41r / s. ' �p � AIY-0i 'P3 YV Jh ry 8 1,41'' � OM7 //I. p �" �eo it fj� dt `E all x.8 ? e�d i% ZP� M y b AAd t ,y 4 8 .} "'v I/ l a k f �6 kt W v«ev o MILTON e i } n1"xkr r �S w I i IR 5 �4 5 rzEfi. I IV 66 MiSi Vt. jlattev1ne 4- 8 80 '5":5 .t' 9URLINGTO! (119) s ,I lone lc4 ' C 90 a \ 5 5 >• ' 9,.. f 5 to y — b 3 Z I"., Firestone I? ` 1J Frederick / H oKeannnbarg I1 II II,I Y. Igk t, Pi T W �Audaon' r.� o Vn1Ie 6 o r. . ` 9 A9 I !#,yI'0. %I a 1i u 8 0 g/ 3 W g Nut!4,rF 25' s "a" �. . 5 5 m I 2 a I 4 k . \� PROSPECT 5 f4 N 7 In ha bar �� � RESERVOIR t g i , FIOILSD 5 2 1 p ,� -Atilt '8:1'', 9 4p 5 5 lc! �3 4 dr._ -- - _ It..., - _ -ADAMS CO LINTY I Il 87' 85 7 ) C 1 a swes4L Soh- m srp us OA 3o MMTHVRN e4.2r aek SURVEY 6 So) This nearly level to moderately sloping map unit is on grown crops. Unless protected, they are subject to floc plains and alluvial fans throughout the survey area. It ing. The potential is fair for development of wildl makes up about 23.5 percent of the total acreage. About habitat. 35 percent is Olney soils, 20 percent is Kim soils, 15 per- 12. Nunn-Dacono-Altvan cent is Otero soils, and 30 percent is soils of minor extent. The soils in this map unit occupy the same relative Deep, level and nearly level, well drained beams and el, positions on the landscape (fig. 2). Olney soils have a loam.s fanned in alluvium loamy sand or sandy loam surface layer and a sandy clay This level and nearly level map unit is on high terrac loam subsoil. Kim soils have a loam surface layer and and alluvial fans throughout the survey area. It. makes 1 loam and fine sandy loam underlying material. Otero soils about 7 percent of the total acreage. About 45 percent have a sandy loam surface layer and fine sandy loam un- Nunzi soils, 15 percent is Dacono soils, 15 percent is A. denying material. van soils, and 25 percent is soils of minor extent. Minor in this unit are the well drained Ascalon, Nelson, The soils in this map unit occupy the same relati Thedalund, and Vona soils. positions on the landscape (fig. 3). Nunn soils have a boa This map unit is used for irrigated and nonirrigated or clay loam surface layer and a clay loam subsoil. Dacoi cropland and for rangeland. The potential is good for soils have a clay loam surface layer and subsoil. Altus urban development and fair for wildlife habitat. soils have a loam surface'layer and a sandy clay loam i Otero-Thedalund-Nelson light clay loam subsoil. Dacono and Altvan soils have sar and gravel underlying material between depths of 20 ar Deep and moderately deep, nearly level to moderately 40 inches. sloping, well drained sandy learns and clay learns Minor in this unit are the well drained Ascalon. Colon formed in alluvium and eolic'.n deposits and in residuum bo, and Olney soils. from shale and sandstone This map unit is. used mainly for irrigated cr�lani '. This nearly level to moderately sloping map unit is on The potentza11s only fart to poor for urban developmen . survey area. It The main limitations are shrink swell, low strength, an plains in the north-central part of the makes up about 3 percent of the!total.acreage. About 35 slow permeability of the heavier clay loamy. The b tat. percent is Otero soils, 25 percent is Thedalund soils, 25 is fair for the development of openland wild] fe habitat. percent is Nelson soils, and :!5 percent is soils of minor 13. Julesburg-Bresser extent. Otero soils are on the nearly level or smoother side Deep, level and nearly level, well drained sandy loam slopes. Thedalund and Nelson soils are intermingled and formed in alluvium • ' are on the steeper side slopes. Otero soils have a sandy This level and nearly level map unit is on the highe loam surface layer and fine sandy loam underlying terraces along the South Platte River in the west-centra material. Thedalund soils have a loam surface layer and part of the survey area. It makes up about 1.5 percent:.o underlying material. Shale is between depths of 20 and 40 the total acreage.About 45 percent is Julesburg soils, jl inches. Nelson soils have a fire sandy loam surface layer percent is Bresser soils, and 40 percent is soils of minor and underlying material. Sandstone is between 20 and 40 extent. inches. The soils in this map unit, occupy the same relativt Minor in this unit are the well drained Kim, Renohill, positions on the landscape. Julesburg soils have a sandy Terry, and Vona soils. loam surface layer and subsoil..Bresser soils have a sandy This map unit is used mainly for irrigated cropland. Soil loam surface layer and a sandy.clay'loam subsoil. depth is the man limitation in farming and urban Minor in this unit are the well drained Otero and Olney development. The potential is fair for development of soils and the excessively drained Valent soils. openland wildlife habitat. This map unit is used mainly for irrigated cropland. The potential is good for urban development and-fain for 7. Tassel-Thedalund-Terry openland wildlife habitat. Shallow to moderately deep, gently sloping to strongly i L. ' sloping, well drained sandy towns to clay loans formed Broad land use considerations in residuum from sandstone and shale This gently sloping to strongly sloping map unit is in Deciding what land should be used for urban develop- the western part of the survey area, adjacent to and in- ment is an important issue in the survey area. Each year eluding the sandstone breaks along some of the major a considerable acreage is developed for urban use in streams. It makes up about 1 percent of the total acreage. Greeley and other cities and areas. The general soil map About 50 percent is Tassel soils, 20 percent is Thedalund is most helpful in planning the general outline of urban soils, 20 percent is Terry soils, and 10 percent is soils of areas, but it cannot be used in selecting sites for specific minor extent. urban structures. In general, the soils that have good WELD COUNTY ASSESSOR Account#: R1247986 PROPERTY PROFILE Parcel#: 080310000013 MH Seq#: MH Space: Appr Year: 1999 Levy: 81.525 #of Bldgs: 0 Active On: Tax Dist: 0220 Map#: LEA: InactiveOn: Assign To: JLS Initials: BRF Acct Type: Last Updated: 7/14/99 Owner's Name and Address: Property Address: KAISER HERMAN & HILDA 3312 CARSON AV EVANS CO 80620-1414 Business/Complex: Sales Summary Legal Description 13612 E2NW4 10 6 65(1R) Land Valuation Summary Abst Unit of Number Of Value Per Assmt *Assessed Land Type Ag Code Code Measure Units Unit Actual Value Percent Value Agricultural E VII 4167 Acres 7.81 $5.82 $45 29.00% $13 Agricultural B III 4'117 Acres 32.27 $386.92 $12,486 29.00% $3,621 Agricultural A III 4'117 Acres 38.92 $386.92 $15,059 29.00% $4,367 Land Subtotal: 79 $27,590.29 $8,000.00 Buildings Valuation Summary Total Property.Value $27,590 #Error *Approximate Assessed Value • Tuesday, July 20, 1999 Page 1 of 2 IIMINIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII . N F L -' . : + •r - fti;,� 4,,,14:44-4- 4-_--",43-',,x C i A- x 1,4v_44 F--,:.-‘,..1,,,,,,,,.-„,.,..u -- • L �, •'''.4-414,-'4,--•••44-4---,,,,fn' x "� . T{' ,s C "7�C�� 4. T7.,� f .S 's.�at 44-..,:f.4•44-4,4„J.,.p : t ulj1' ygt� ; i, ip- rt'a - ✓ a - '�' j 4 of y ( � y. ii k_•z ' y x " i 4, t e d7>' 'tX ��� . _ _ „„„,..,..„.,,,,,,f.„2:.,..„ 7 'b1 }'?SF �� a"1�!C+fi - i.aY4t— M. V'R f I 51S- k .y �R 4...„,„.„.,„,„‘„,,,,R, (Y 4,A,R 9.4( �w f� fir "d r q,F, • arsy,..,,,,,,,..„.„,.•.•,„„„:„:...,,,v,„;,,„..-,,,,,,. ......„.;4.,# }v r. .i S 1 5y " Y"^ a4<4', g ;� ,• �t3"$Z 'v' 2Y-i�, t- ad nf� X ,y �w.. v S . o ^fit "d!'��' F `J+ i '..+ .n s i 1"Trs9,3 �, 9 n �' a t� _. d t- 8 't y 4,r y x,i qaG 2> -Kr 4£ :. 4,a;n ',§d ) o e l r w9', n r. 4.-44�iY lld }t M" 1yi Gf -0 * Sfa} I ...• •'Jaiy40-.. .,r , "," *"L',:. R*.ppn & i4 ` t ;S ./' <q :Y q:r,1 a y,Ye' - - • n fit, P. ,-t 4•a(a4V ec ip*' ;4 y":,a� f—'' •#4 ��"JAM s , i y,.� p ?t ,� 4..a2.µ f14 .. xi"'y. �µ, y 'a' 4 ¢Q:€��_t�Y i i. .k ..:•- it y. k`4, sRr` 5'31P ;v*" ' N, t"?k`4 t . . it � 24, �r^tt"r `i ft k, r7( CM p F F Pt, e��1 YrS Y q4 u�Y5 n _ i M` }' • III ' iJu.4+y�jX'Y5 _ 65 f 4n _ s4, :; L 'I - _- t ..S _ _ — — _ _ ,y. rig. 'SI? +s. fir++ �. AP£ ���;aa. ,f(]�".RMMT'� fh r.,k �""ok x i-n y tyo"w r x d ' a y t≥' v •4=-O,_.;,,,-O,s.,,_.- 444,`4':4+—�i .a 'p ., �'gri*Yi°,4, -- 5 ,s :. . •444';S41.-W•15`'r' r x ,� ' -F- u p 4 [ Std. f'1'.;,>'''"4.-:44],j,::::0,1' 'f�' a' "- .. ' pi ys' ++.p`'4,(. yr: . }}A 7k- 5.,„ ° 4, • .?p,s w4S -�•Y 4 t. '7j l �N ii -t d-,r4 '4 4n.� '''"S'F t`yi tfa4 K.''� f t 1 ./ ( ,4 A 'c r-----!..'",4-41444444-4- c Wa- O „` r r•. .F ..e.._ _ _ _- . — • - -4ggeSt t 4 ' a .x �m ( f f c4:3`+" t ( tki-',w"'°�, : t la,.~f at c t ' 4 s '?� to l -.t x rff a a v $- - - 44.4,44,,,:-...-, f y. ^" r r s t 441.4. yr r 4, r x k i '" r ----- Y ' F ' �4 r wu `t� t 'Si t r v ; ;ra'2sr 't"'r v j <{'^p"' 3" -. xr Vu "Ysf ' ,t*x ) .. M �4 4, .r+ 's.s trod 2#k .,' ..47,-. S.- ,.52:', t s F py.t x� ~c e"a fi` t 5, n,r '' '.a4 k ,4k , '• ^. f` vrsr,,;: a : 'i; 3 1 .sx 3.µi Nd�'.'^v t "p ,fir,` nl'I�...- • a I • :I k t' f Y 11 , R ss �y''t, .. , ; .� .-ra r 4- • , '' +'` - +k4, • < (.• . r .� Yi-,,,,,-,;:.O„,,e. s,4,.. & .rT`c r. mk_ �a �,--VAYS Y .. zt"fl- y IL'I4. `-- .v. s"5't + . L, p i 'rrr14� - }i „. ” x e i.' ' P'lir t t"' s wee. _ - ", ,, it/-- 3;;:r:- 11: • 1 r cY r. s4rt� ' [ .. '' f s y¢d5`5ap3x¢ x`-�a`f' -.�.ri. .. - '.._, +..s 4 t ' ` u u p � � 1(4,, '{'—I '_��'�'' n Y...sS":.,e�.u.r �� t. 4ILr i ..,,.,,.----D w Iw „wrtri ,—a.A r!,:-.-.. a--Y.y, r .j.--1A.;--..V",!-,.::',1•A:',',:: Il _ "t z d t 3 'i N r f' 5 5 "1} F< rnsi y Mq w x+1dxki+-Rljrc+i`+ Y� r-t 'et. I. zr . X'4r a "N dq :,, z `:*�C YT'^' v j, r (p E t .q.• l� S S - R°i5 is f ' Qlr � in'. ''ry I t' I 1. '1 � f t -, c r ,; ',_,' • t` ', C Cl bCk CT fi ...3:44.Y'. y z .. p M -� 4 . , 5 h In Y`'I,-hl 't5F`,' �R. �`r k1 Yt ',+."y/�' r 4 Ohl g•! ° ` u j,pieti,55 5L �'^'� t rI sr t�1 I wd ,5irKi ^,4*+■qp n.0 ''c rI 1 16. t l�] J ;., —�" - i n ,Wil r;'s r�N <17 1 rt i C 7s �`' „,,u s > p�ra,a . .r aq Y {�R: "��} "4 'f t '1Vf31i 44A'�}'y - .` I" tD av Wit'.rI x. . 7..�. -4,154 ',954,40=4'4,7,- 7 a2.1O7 IT ,"q' ) S�� to _ .f�t, :w jrytgfA��y,� a ..a R�+ � ~w"gSc ,.,',.i..16,4•447!0%,,��Fh: ' y '.���R't" 'KA"5N ry t k @ k fis h '�. ' Y.3 .. .'G.Ni,.. iC:'j�' � k;Yf ii y f .L ,� r S i `5 P.t• rk`„".,• u<' .v 3trf5 m -- 'hi, .NN��.aM°S I {�' i, - This parcel is the E2NW4 10 6 65, located 3 miles east and 1 mile north of Lucerne. There are no improvements. I personally inspected this land on Friday, 7/16/99. It is currently used as flood irrigated cropland for corn, alfalfa, etc. There is a total of 79 acres of agland. Page #1 shows the location of section 10-6-65 on the USDA General soil type map. As you can see, it contains general soil types #6, and#12. Page #2 includes copies of the soil type descriptions for#6 Otero-Thedalund-Nelson soils, and#12-Nunn-Dacono- Altvan soils. In both cases the soils are used mainly for irrigated cropland. Based on my inspection and acreage calculations, I make the following recommendations for the agland classifications for this parcel. For abstract#4167—waste @ 7.81 acres. Remove the waste class. Upon inspection, I saw no indication of adverse growing conditions that would warrant the designation. There were crops growing in these areas. This is not consistent with other parcels that contain wasteland. Usually there are no crops at all growing in these areas, or they grow so poorly that it is apparent that waste is the proper classification. For abstract#4117-70 acres of class AIII @ $386.92 =$27,084.40. 9 acres of class BII @ $551.38 = $ 4,962.42. 79 $32,046.82 This is an increase of$4,456.53. I therefore recommend that this change be made for the year 2000. I ask that the appeal for 1999 be denied. .oc•cozo Colorado Department of Local Affairs DIVISION OF PROPERTY TAXATION y * `W0 Mary E. Huddleston * 4 CO * Property Tax Administrator * ... � p Y 1876 Roy Romer Governor TO: All County Assessors FROM: -Mary E. Huddleston 1rP'JOa Property Tax Administrator SUBJECT: 1999 Agricultural Prices, Rental Rates, and Expenses and 1999 Rural Structures Local Multipliers DATE: January 4, 1999 DISTRIBUTION: Circulate to Agricultural Land and Rural Structures Appraisal Staff. File in ARL Volume 3, Section V. ------ -- --------------------- MEMORANDUM The following attachments are to be used for the valuation of agricultural land and rural structures for the 1999 assessment year: ADDENDUM V - A - 1999 AGRICULTURAL PRICES, RENTAL RATES, AND EXPENSES ADDENDUM V-G - 1999 RURAL STRUCTURES LOCAL MULTIPLIERS On December 17, 1998, the Statutory Advisory Committee to the Property Tax Administrator (SAC) recommended the attached agricultural prices, rental rates, and expenses for approval and use in both 1999 and 2000. The attached rural structures local multipliers were recommended for approval and use in both 1999 and 2000. The State Board of Equalization (SBOE) has thirty days to review SAC recommendations. If the SBOE's review results in changes to the questionnaire, you will be so advised in a separate memorandum. If you have any questions, please contact the Division at 866-2371. s-fl EI MH:SG:swg 1313 Sherman Street, Room 419, Denver, CO 80203, (303) 866-2371 G:\GRPA\ASCOM\MASTER31313Q:3D.3E)93B6)6300 FAX (303) 866-4000 E-MAIL mary.huddleston@state.co.us 5.82 ADDENDUM V-A, 1999 AGRICULTURAL PRICES, RENTAL RATES AND EXPENSES COMMODITY PRICES The agricultural commodity prices reported are for the ten-year period 1988-1997. Use of the commodity prices, expenses, and AUM rental rates are required by all Colorado counties for the 1999 reappraisal year and for the following intervening __ year. Previously published price lists have been reduced to the most typical crops grown in the state. The commodity prices have been reviewed by the Statutory Advisory Committee and approved by the State Board of Equalization pursuant to 39-2-131 and 39-9-103(10), C.R.S. Average Crops Commodity Price All Hay $ 83.23 ton Barley (feed) $ 2.28 bushel Corn (grain) $ 2.49 bushel Sorghum (grain) $ 2.21 bushel Wheat (all) $ 3.30 bushel AUM RENTAL RATES AND AGRICULTURAL EXPENSES The following AUM rental and agricultural expense items are researched by the Division, and must be used in the valuation of agricultural lands. The expense for each item listed is an average of the ten year period (1988-1997). Irrigated Land Alfalfa seed expense (per acre) $ 7.90 Landlord baling expense (per ton) $ 5.88 Fence expense (per acre) $ 1.53 15-DIVISION-AS PUB ARL VOL 3 1-89 Revised 1-99 5.83 Dry Farm Land Fence expense (per acre) $ .92 Meadow Hay Land AUM rental rate $ 9.78 Water Expense (per acre) $ 7.08 Fence expense (per acre) $ 1.53 Grazing Land AUM rental rate $ 9.78 Fence and water expense (per acre) $ .71 Crop yields and other landlord expenses not listed must be determined locally from typical farmers and ranchers in each production area. Locally researched yields and expenses must represent 1988 through 1997 ten-year averages. NOT ALL EXPENSES ALLOWED Not all expenses are allowable. The first condition which must be met for an expense to be allowed in the net income landlord formula is it be a typical landlord expense. Harvest expenses are not allowed in the formula since they typically are not landlord expenses. Allowing expenses which are typically tenant expenses would have the effect of reducing net landlord income twice for the cost of labor. Therefore, tenant expenses are never allowed in the formula. The second condition which must be met for an expense to be an allowable expense is it must be necessary to cultivate a crop. If crops can be and are being produced without the expense, the expense is not allowable. Water expense for irrigated land is necessary to produce an irrigated crop. The third condition which must be met for an expense to be an allowable expense is it must be within an allowable expense category. Insurance expenses, whether they be for crop insurance or for sprinkler irrigation equipment, are not allowable because in addition to the fact they are not necessary for cultivation of crop, insurance is not an allowable expense category. See TYPICAL LANDLORD EXPENSE CATEGORIES under VALUATION OF AGRICULTURAL LANDS. 15-DIVISION-AS PUB ARL 3 1-89 Revised 1-99 ..4, m 1.0 r CO m < n CO Q ,O ,O N CO n :¢�, a1... ,:i v 1 O 1 O Q N m t 7 CO N m [7 CD N IV) 7 •441 rN ONO r Nrn N 0OO 0.a) {5.i" W ma) NCI tOQ Nm c'1 al r•-• a? a! y • N N n t"1 n l t•1 N N N N a I co rn N �S✓✓1 N N N N N N N Cr) N N t 0 0 - ,en• N19 6919 w 19 Vl F949 V16666N 3� # V6 CO 61 V6 V1 VP 666619 69 1a9 19N -' la •j K v • �/ yam)n){ tY y�y(��,{ll'G 5's f`KTcf 0 11 Y1✓ .L �i-'1-“v d E m V.-etc.':: "ar N "r i vjr y n y'€lv (7n r 0: 0O1 0, ON to to co 'sr co OOrN ca Y (nf-Ivry'01 10 03 t0 t0N Ne'f N Q N Ot O• tO mQ EQ �'Y 5ppV HN MNN NN 40101•6401.1.01- > . • N• N a in M NN W WN 45 N � 2 3 � 0 C ly'`S.--n'cK 41 .Q r I- 10 Q Q Q Cl CO 1-• t0 Q m co 'cy-.J5' - coo I`a co 1, Of co N N CO1n co It 3 C /"7.4 Cl Q O r O O CO 0 0 Cl O O N(V ,l N b N N N Cl r Q N 0 rn N 1- Q 16 0 14: V N N N CV e N e NCON N CO 7',./ tt N (V (V NNN NNNN C N = "25Y V,CO 61192919 Vf VP 616919 VIN G. 9 6661 0)10 Vi 69 61 CO CO 69 19 19 CV col CO � .,y h CO 0 , '.. 0 2O2 -, Y-,,'- m P V" CO Vl m h CO N CO vf vr O O ,.....;:e....,;.' O m b Q m N CO N N Q b rn O O G - r y con Or OO m�- e O(' -^ m a m N to() NO N CO OI0OOl10 .2v rz.�f8 N N N N N r N N l0 M l7 N 0 NNNaco Ul ` t9.19 6161196166t96966t919N - 6f 19 191969191919 t96)6666N U • • . G m n co 0 0 r N C l Q a t O n W / "-F m n m 0 0 r N t 0 Q N O N W i1> '0-,i& m m m m rn rn m rn rn m m rn C ,7- w m m m m m m a m m m 0 m 0 �, 0rn malmmof m00mm • ! mm mmo,m000mma �' a. W rtIfr. W ;7-4.11 , L< ,h• < M N 0 0 >G N N CO CO Q O r N Q W N C) O O L Q OR N N CI N O I O •- N N N r C I a f ,< N N a Cl N a 1•l a a Q Q Cl Q Cl p V N N N N •- N Na a a t7 N N .m *4 .< 6619 19 19 19 19 f9 61 61 f9 61 t0 C1 k_. 61 f9 49 19 19• 6)69 f9 69 M 61 f9 N sc W N • .. a K !� 7l �Yx-;.„,' ....4 ,„ a f o m ,e r �./ i '5 r z a cc o fa ''" /fl::f 00, tOCImtVClA6-) 06- 00 s "9':� P � OrN ' AOOm1- IOm O g p J j'� O r N Ia N N CD or O N !i N CO CO Of a r m O) C•7 O CO N NON U V V j4_,{ F4- N N t0 tO N N N N 10 Q Q f0 N l0 $�{. r r a N r N r N NNN NNN rn X- 61 Q j < < 4 • m J re V F` 7 CO O I-- N N I CD CO N N r CO CO 01 2' T I l r -t O N Q r m O a O . N m N O N N I-- Q in l 1I co r N co co CO N y t? I t) N N m r m Q m m N N r N a 6`t N N a l C l N N N N CO QQ a l N in a N r N 43 N r N N N N N V J' o s u (919 6919!9 66 29 CO CO 69 W 66 C1 - O 69 rM 616161 N W CO H 616166 N m O Z a ,< - ≥ < I N / ; ' v TS 1 u 0 F .,--i Olin N t0 m h 1OON 0000' b t...-..,..2 No NN OO0)O C) Nn in (OO o rr/ NOrN Cl of a N a NCI O V al 'et oa Cl C)C) / p, rN t7mmr mN OmNNON O a. a Cites 19r-, tVrrtVrN00 NNrN O / 40 fa 66 CO 196919•1619 66 Cr)C1 t HW W t9 H H V.V.W CO 19 M N '- c2 v '- ?.., �i:-C E H ✓ �/-�4 t/er3 CO V- CC0r NflQ Ot01- UI S'...1';',,,...2 N1- COOr CV CO QN101- W .. o `.*` ,�_ mm mmol m morn mmm g r-- mm mmmmrnmmmmm t, t2 m m m 0 m 0 co rn m m m m K f_• m m m m O rn m rn FA so, m go) IR o 'a a d c 1 a ,E.24., /^ W s� r q E i t N' Q o f V ^ 2 a O O aq riiN v 0 d O • • •:, gZ m +,---t—\V.a T...'I& Ifl&1 nu- Vv! IVFK I Y IA AIX i II )N Y Y e r.1^%'-w'f 00 00000000000to -4�.,� o O O In N to In O O to o 0 to60 ' lr IDN Nr OOynr toc9t76p V a La{IY;-= on n n n n n O n n o n n n ow D n n n n N O n 1 D O n n N a iitN“' t1- D) mN0 r -Q-O6Dr 0Nth . 1:t-,..,) low69 tD tD69 b n O) o mon cD �+ 6969 .............. 60 W -.04C CO " w U mA' oi... 70 t ° m my : = c m Om— :I.:5'1=3,,,::: 4 d Ca 0 W ` 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 m 0 V �a�'C� '°. go 00000000000n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 7. U rci� fl N ton nn to N-n CO N 0) W 00)O M o 0 1 K 0 o f O O 000000000000 9 O�� U o0 0000000000,0 0 ,- • 0). 0 , wtd NCid (Q690 O6+iOtori ow ` "I? Win mco4nbo4rnrn4O CC 6969 696969696969696969r COc0 E '•oz = 69 06 aWO r In ; m 6D ""' '" 00 000000000000) 3 c '- -. t069 N. r lot. co tO6o O) tn oO N tp /ii S 4, 69 0) co 6960 69 co to to O N CO }w� 6919« 69696969 www69wrGO ,„-.. �i w N t6 • d T l= t0O O to O) '6; S1 0) a O) W 0) • . "4,a- W 0 G O)O) 0) 0) 0) O) W a0) 00) 0) (:J 2 6 O -0 W r a D . Hello