HomeMy WebLinkAbout950390.tiffis ' tvg
Wilk.
COLORADO
mEmoRAnuum
Todd Hodges
To Weld County Planning
Date
November 21, 1994/
From Trevor Jiricek, Supervisor, Environmental Protection Services .J
Subject: Case Number: USR-1065 Name: Boyd, Arthur and Patricia
N
SE4 of Section 05, Township 01 North, Range 65 West
Environmental Protection Services has reviewed this proposal; the following
conditions are recommended to be part of any approval:
1. All liquid and solid wastes shall be stored and removed for final disposal
in a manner that protects against surface and groundwater contamination.
2. No permanent disposal of wastes shall be permitted at this site.
3. Waste materials shall be handled, stored, and disposed in a manner that
controls fugitive dust, blowing debris, and other potential nuisance
conditions.
4. The maximum permissible noise level shall not exceed the light industrial
limit of 70 db(A), as measured according to 25-12-102, Colorado Revised
Statutes.
5. The toilet facilities in the house shall be available for employees and
patrons of the repair shop.
6. The existing house septic system is required to be reviewed by a Colorado
Registered Professional Engineer and a copy of that review submitted to
this Division. IN the event the system is found to be inadequate, the
system must be brought into compliance with current I.S.D.S. Regulations.
TJ/cs-3767
(1
4/ NOV o ,) 1994
950390
STATE OF COLORADO
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Region 4
1420 Ind Street
P.O. Box 850
Greeley, Colorado 80632-0850
(303) 353-1232
Weld County, SH 52
Boyd Site Specific Development
Plan and Special Review
S.W. Corner SH 52/WCR 41
1 1/2 Miles W. of Hudson
November 15, 1994
Mr. Todd Hodges - Current Planner
Department of Planning Services
Weld County Administrative Offices
1400 N. 17th Avenue
Greeley, CO 80631
Dear Todd,
The Arthur and Patricia Boyd Site Specific Development Plan and
Special Review to add an auto repair shop has been reviewed. We offer
the following comments:
RIGHT-OF-WAY The plan shows a 50 foot right-of-way south of the
section line and does not indicate the relationship of the section
line to the state highway centerline. Projected traffic on SH 52
indicates the need for a 150 foot total ROW, with 75 feet each
side of the highway centerline. Additional width to meet the
projected need should be protected by reservation or, preferably,
dedication as permitted by County regulations.
ACCESS The plan shows and describes two existing accesses to SH 52.
Items H and I of the Special Review address those two existing
driveways and future traffic to the site. Item F addresses the
number of employees. The information which has been provided does
not include existing traffic information. It is not possible
without a comparison of those two volumes to make a complete
review of this proposal.
Access to the state highway system is governed by the State
Highway Access Code. Section 2.10.3 defines the term "change of
use" of property. If it is determined that the increase of
traffic is more than 201 over the existing volume, the Department
should be contacted in order to review access. We have the
opportunity and the obligation to bring access to a property into
conformance with the Code if a change of use is anticipated. That
conformance could require closure and/or improvements to existing
accesses which would be authorized by a State Highway Access
Permit. That permit is obtained from this office. If you
determine that the traffic volume is increased more than 20%, I
recommend that you contact Ms. Gloria Hice-Idler at (303) 350-2148
in order to arrange a site visit. Ijil)�)WilSgl
N0V + 7 1994
w EXHIBIT
Pt
_
444
950.391
Mr. Todd Hodges
November 15, 1994
Page 2 of 2
UTILITIES
within the
required.
Department
Boyd Site Specific Plan
If new utility lines or connections are necessary
state highway right-of-way, a utility permit will be
Prior to any such utility work, Mr. Henry Rangel of the
should be contacted at (303) 350-2111.
Our comments are based upon the submittal as received October 26,
1994. I apologize for not meeting your November 9th deadline and hope
that the timing of our comments has not posed a problem for your
planning process. These written comments duplicate my verbal message
to you of November 14, 1994.
Thank you for the opportunity to review the Boyd Site Specific
Development Plan and Special Review proposal.
TGJ:gi
xc: G. Hice-Idler
G. Sisson
file
Sincerely,
Te4a G. Jones
Region Develo ent/Access Coordinator
950390
Hello