HomeMy WebLinkAbout982578.tiff rip COFTY
November 30, 1998
18 DEC - I AN 8: 59
Marty K. Mathews
15024 Mary Avenue CLERK
Fort Lupton, CO 80621 TO THE EGA::
(303 )857-2197
Barbara Kirkmier, Weld County Commissioner
RE: Second Reprimand Letter = Weld County.
This is my second letter of Reprimand, in this matter
with Weld County Planning, and whom-ever else is involved.
I am very upset at this point and DEMAND clarification of
these said problems.
I have invested every penny I own in:
15024 Mary Ave.
a total of $170, 000 dollars cash. and,Parcel 1309 27 300003
I went through every County Office/Agency required to put
my second home on Parcel 1309 27 300003. I paid all fees and
followed every aspect of Weld County Laws and rules.
I was then going to sell my first home, 15024 Mary Avenue,
only to be informed - MONTHS - later that it was illegally
subdivided?
So I decided to move back to 15024 Mary Avenue and sell my
second home, Parcel 1309 27 300003, Only to be informed
MONTHS later that it also was an illegally split Parcel?
So Weld County Laws and Rules were violated over 18 years
ago and yet your Planning Department would rather hold me
responsible. Both properties should be released for sale
and the said problems should be GRANDFATHERED-IN!
I have called and spoke with more Weld County workers than
I care to remember, each it seems, with their own rules.
EXAMPLE: Late July early August: "Sharon White" informed
me via telephone conversation, that my new address for
Parcel 1309 27 300003 = 15076 Mary Avenue. I still receive
my electric bill to this address, delivered to my 15024 Mary
Ave, Mailbox.
A YEAR later I am told once again over the phone that this
address is not legal and that Sharon White no longer works
in this department????
cc: 81e,
982578
Then when I bitched enough people in your offices finally
got together and gave my Parcel 1309 27 300003 an address,
which by the way I still do not agree with. 15075 Higgins.
And the Planning Office also informed me that all of my
Permits for Parcel 1309 27 300003 should have never been
granted? This they never let me forget.
I have documented 80% of my telephone calls and personal
contacts with Weld County Offices for my own protection.
I will relinquish this entire list if necessary.
As I mentioned at the start of this letter, that I invested
every penny here in this property. And noi.z a days I am
barely getting by finacially. My Disability income is only
$420.00 a month. So as a result of Weld County' s delays,
and restrictions upon the LEGAL sale of said properties
I have been forced into selling and pawning everything I
own just to feed my family and pay my bills.
I am extremely upset.
I do not expect MONEY from Weld County.
I am not expecting anyone to be fired at Weld County.
I only want this matter rectified in a fair and timely manner
so that I can sell and go on with my life
I spoke once again with "Sherry Lockman" this morning and
allthough she is trying to get my properties back to legal
she stated she would rather not listen to my complaints
about the entire mess anymore particularly the new address?
And I as an American, Coloradan Tax-Payer who helps to pay
all of Weld Counties Employees Lively-Hoods can not accept
this type treatment any longer.
Sincerely Upset
Marty K. Mathews
VELD COUNTY
Prfl' ' ' hir'.;1_'n,^
Marty Keith Mathews
15024 Mary Avenue E ' E - k �� Q�
Fort Lupton, CO 80621 -4059
( 303 )857-2197 CLERK
TC) THE ECG;"
September 11 , 1998
RE: Reprimand Letter
Weld County Planning Office:
I am writing this letter of complaint to those of you who
are and have been working on my requests, permits, etc. . .
I have been waiting patiently for your decisionsogiven 15076
rdg
w s not only a new address - Which by the way
Mary Ave. once by "Sharon White" , only to be told a year later
that "She does not work in this office anymore" '
And that was not a legitimate address?
When I called for the Legitimate address I was told to call
David Lucero, In which I did promptly, only to leave a message
as he was not in, that was June 26 , 1998. I called again the
following Tuesday June 30, 1998 and once again was met with
the answer machine and I again left the message to contact me
for a new address. I never got called back.?
That Upsets me.
I requested permission to Sub-Divide the 13.92 acres I own,
over a year ago. I even went as far as a meeting with "Scott"
in your W.C. Planning Office. But after 6 month' s waiting he
could only muster a telephone message for me stating that he
had not even opened my files and would be returning them to
the front offices, where I began, with no help.
Finally today your office decides to give my 13 .92 acre home
an address, oh but not to me the owner - no but to a Realtor?
How about that? I thought that was the owners information?
And I hear tell, that some expensive sub-divisions are needed
before sales can be legal. Then why was I allowed to buy
these properties? It sounds like your problems - not mine!
And what about all of this talk of "Grand-Fathered In"
Your
13 .92 acres. Permit
3 set-up
address your office usedwasto be
on
temporary only. And yet someone entered in your computer that
the new set-up was to be the only home on 15024 Mary Ave.
As if I were removing the existing home at this addaddress.ed tell
And rather than discuss this with me you people 77722
om
the Realtor people this information who then told me
Look your county is large I know, then you should hire the
appropriate staff to rectify these type serious problems. I
for one will tell you I am EXTREMELY UPSET! I also know that
I am not the only home owner in Aristocrat who is upset.
Especially considering I have followed your rules!
I have paid for all of your permits you required.
I have and pay healthy taxes to pay for your living, so try
and make my life a little easier and get this mess straightened
out once and for good.
Sincerely Upset
Marty Keith Mathews
P.S. I will need the ingormation on my Certificate of Occupancy
changed to the appropriate address.
And the Porch Permit will need updated.
CORRESPONDENCE RESPONSE
fY1on Ca
DEPARTMENT Plann„19 &rv,ce5
****PLEASE RESPOND BY: i 3 I y5� ****
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Narrative:
No ,' uc,untv Planning Dept.
DEC 0 2 1998
ttiSEIVED
METHOD OF RESPONSE:
Board Action
Worksession
Letter (Attached)
Telephone Call
No Response
per MottitAAal
outtec_kZ ' Staff Signatur
K:\opman\rdcompl1
05/28/98
bytomii-
j a/fl/9d'
r - •
<I" From: MONICA MIKA
To: CENTDOMAIN.CENTPOST(LMORRISON)
Subject: marty mathews -Reply -Reply -Reply
I do not believe on o3 parcel but they did on one of his parcels. I will get
back to you on this.
»> LEE MORRISON 12/16/98 04:19pm »>
o Not- needed lss ,,this issue is.unresolved:
nge. K*.Wrii )15.0- mot
Has the Board been asked to issue a building permit on an illegal parcel-on
parcel 1309 27 300003 and declined? Is this not an option ?
o
From: MONICA MIKA •
.a
To: CENTDOMAIN.CENTPOST(lmorrison)
Date: 12/16/98 2:34pm
Subject: marty mathews -Reply
i
egf otRsitra' Wssage I am under the impression that you do not believe that
�ncrtit °let athewAN:6 advisable.
>>> Lee Morrison 12/15/98 03 :21pm >>>
I have reviewed the file and can find only a few minor concerns.
The letter of 10/21/98 mentions zoning violations which preclude issuance of
building permits. Technically these are also subdivision violations
Has the Board been asked to issue a building permit on an illegal parcel-on
parcel 1309 27 300003 and declined? Is this not an option ?
I concur that there are illegal non-build able permits and the most permanent
solution would involve RE and resubdivision.
apart from the problem with the mailing address , I don't see any major
problems with the way the case was handled and it appears that the most recent
complaint was addressed by the staff in earlier letters.
Lee D. Morrison
Assistant County Attorney
Hello