HomeMy WebLinkAbout991128.tiff STATE OF COLORADO
COLORADO DEPART:LIENT OF HUMAN SERVICES oe Colo
Office of Self-Sufficiency ``(:_L D Q, PI?
1575 Sherman Street n - 0
Denver,Colorado 80203-1714 I'' ' - w e
Phone: (303)866-5981 2: <..♦
FAX: (303)866-5488 I'r 7 [[•.7
n r[p ',876.
Bill Owens
- }
Governor
^ Min•IJ.inpmn
�t
r,Kmn.Director
June 16, 1999
Ms. Judy Griego, Director
Weld County Department of Social Services
P.O. Box A •
Greeley, CO 80631
Dear Ms. Griego,
Enclosed please find the Colorado Works Work Participation Rate information for October 1998 through April
1999 and the year-to-date information for all counties.
As you are well aware the federal All Families requirement for FFY'99 is 35% effective through September 30,
1999. The State's year-to-date figure is at 34.4%. Your staff is to be congratulated for their efforts to meet this
increased rate especially considering the average weekly hours has increased as well. Keep in mind that as of
October I, 1999 (FFY'00)the All Families requirement will increase to 40%. It is also important to note that as of
October I, 1999,the average weekly hours will increase to 30 in work and/or work activities.
Individual counties and the state as a whole continue to struggle with the participation rate requirement for the Two-
Parent Household population. The federal requirement for the Two-Parent rate is now 90%. Our seven-month
average is well below that with only 40.2%. Meeting the Two-Parent rate continues to be a challenge we must ALL
take more seriously. I encourage counties to dedicate time, staff and resources to better serve the needs of this
group of Colorado Works Program participants and strive to meet the 90% requirement. The state and individual
counties face serious financial sanctions if this performance measure is not met.
All counties with two-parent caseloads have been advised of special teleconferences to discuss strategies to meet the
two-parent participation rate. If you are one of these counties, we look forward to your continued participation in
these calls. A future Agency Letter that recommends 'Best Practices" for working with Two-Parent Households
will be issued for your county's consideration. We will continue to work with all counties regarding the work
participation rates including problems and solutions.
If you have questions regarding the enclosed reports or work participation rates in general, please contact me at
(303)866-4404.
Sincerely,
Mary Kay Coo Mama
Employment&Training Section
Colorado Works Program
Enclosure
Cc:Chair,County Board of Commissioners
Vp 1-'
991 128
FEDERAL WORK PARTICIPATION RATE FOR FFY 1998-99 FOR ALL FAMILIES
Participation Rate for March 1999 Participation Rate for April 1999
Oct 1998 Nov 1998 Dec 1998 Jan 1999 Feb 1999 Mar 1999 Apr 1999 \'TD
1 Average
rate rate rate rate rate numerator denominator role numerator denominator rate rate
ADAMS 14.3% 14.6% 12.8% 154% 15.3% 100 487 205% 78 458 170% 157%
ALAMOSA 429% 374% 27.4% 23.1% 35 7% 34 84 405% 42 79 53_2% 37.1°°
ARAPAHOE 34.2% 35 0% 35.2% 340% 37.8% 233 647 360% 270 642 34.3% 35.2°6
ARCHULETA 57.1% 40.0% 50.0% 50.0% 33.3% 7 13 53 8% 6 It 33.3% 454%
BACA 125% C 0% 0.0% 00% 00% 0 10 0.0% 0 9 0.0% I 8%
BENT 64.7% 53.8% 68.8% 64.3% 38.9% 12 I6 75 0% 12 18 667% 62.49e
BOULDER 33.7% 318% 27.9% 26.0% 263% 81 337 240% 89 325 274'„ 28.3°"
CIIAFFEE 45 8% 3.5.7% 20.7% 28 2% 37 8% II 3'_ 344% 9 27 33 3% 32 7°°
CHEYENNE 100.0% IC0.0% 110% 00% 0.0% 0 2 0.0% I - 500°6 3570,,
CLEAR CREEK 667% 0.0% 50.0% 25.0% 16.7% 4 7 57 1% - 7 28.6% 34.9%
CONEJOS 284% 312% 23.1% 12.6% 17.2% 17 100 170% 24 103 233°e 22.09"
COSTILLA 42.1% 46.3% 25.0% 40.9% 385% II 37 297% I4 41 34.1°„ 367%
CROWLEY 45.5% 4'1.6% 40.0% 61.9% 47.5% 20 38 526% 19 34 55996 50.14.,
CUSTER 0O°/" 0.0% (1.0°% 8(0% 00% 0 16 0.0% (3 18 00 0 0",
DELTA 534% 5 7% 35.9% 39.8% 32.1% 28 91 308% 23 80 2639e 38.69.,
DENVER 34 7% 3?.3% 327% 334% 337% 795 2,300 34 6% 774 2216 34.99e 34
DOLORES 0.0% 3000% 50.0% 00% 250% 0 3 00% 3 3 1000°6 3239,
' DOUGLAS 325% 475% 32 4% 18 2% 44 8% 12 25 48 0% 11 25 52.0%." 40 33,
EAGLE 00% 00% 50.0% (1.0% 0O% 0 3 00% 0 3 00%, 7 I%
ELBERT 0.0% 41.2% 25.0% O0% 214% 6 16 375% 0 IJ 00., 17.99,
EL PASO 40.37% 41 9% 38.6% 32.0% 34.1% 608 1,714 35.5% 622 1661 374% 371°„
FREMONT 51.5% 55.2% 39.5% 466% 474% 102 216 47 2% 97 20^. 18.3% 48.09"
GARFIELD 225% 415% 39.0% 45.5% 383% 17 54 315°% 30 57 35.1% 372%
GILPIN 0.0% 00% 00% 00% 0.0% 0 2 0O% (1 I 0.06 (10%
GRAND 5110% 6(7% 33.3% 400% 500% 2 .l 5011% I 4 250"'-" 450"
GUNNISON 45.5% 3( 8% 59.3% 45.5% 38.6% 2 III 700% 7 IS 4679e 3933,,
HINSDALE 0.0% 00% 088% 00% 0.0% 0 I 0.0% 0 I 0.0"6 0.0'6
IIIJERFANO 11.3% IC.0% 1'74% 11.1% 20% 6 40 IS.0% 8 37 21.6.E 1635,.
JACKSON 0D% 1000% 167% 500% 00% 0 6 0.0% 0 5 0.0% 23.8°,,
JEFFERSON 369% 35.1% 29.3% 27.5% 28.9% 225 726 31.0% 256 747 3JS1,, 31 91,
KIOWA 00% 0.0% 66.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0 7 00% 0 2 00% 9.59e
KIT CARSON 00% 25.0% 37.5% 57.1% 400% 3 II 27 3% 5 10 5009" 338'..
LAKE 00% 66.7% 0.0% 500% 00% 0 4 00% 0 5 0.096 I67'
LA PLATA 205% 16 0% 21.7% 17.9% 18(1% II 60 18.3% 9 51 17 6':° 18 6%
LARIMER 29 9% 30.1% 28.9% 262% 31 5% 136 401 33 9% 126 376 33.5% 30.6%
LAS ANIMAS 39.6% 29.1% 20.4% 31.9% 35.1% 34 105 32.1% 30 103 29.re 31.19;.
LINCOLN 40.0% 0.88% 0.0% 00% 429% 1 4 25.0% 2 7 28.6% 195"6
LOGAN 394% 44.4% 44.0% 38.1% 52.6% 10 15 66.7% 6 16 37.5'% 46.173
MESA 35 7% 33.8% 27.5% 34 0% 39.1% 152 375 40.5% 141 360 392% 357%
MINERAL 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 00% 0.0% 0 I 00% 0 I 0.0°° 00%
MOFFAT .33.3% 29.7% 32.4% 43.8% 34.1% 13 41 317% 6 37 16.2% 316'{
MONTEZUMA 19.3% 28.6% 43.851 46.9% 42.2% II 85 36 5% 38 83 45 8% 373",
MONTROSE 280% 26.0% 27.3% 23.5% 22 0% 22 104 21.2% 2(1 104 19.27° 23.9%
MORGAN 37.7% 36.2% 26.0% 25.0% 20.5% 19 72 26.4% 27 70 38.6q. 30.19"
OTERO 392% 40.2% 26.9% 33.6% 395% 57 145 39.3% 54 142 38 0% 36 7%
OURAY 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 00% O0% 0 2 0.046 0 2 009e 0096
PARK 00% 0.0°6 0.0% 00% 00% 0 12 0.050 0 It 0.051 0096
PHILLIPS 10110% 0.0% 00% na 00% 0 3 00% 0 4 0.0% 167%
PITKIN O0% 00% 00% 0.0% 00% 0 I 00% 0 I 00% 0.0%
PROWERS 9.1% 146% 17.0% 18.5% 30.9% 14 56 25.0% 5 55 9.1% 177%
PUEBLO 258% 29.1% 29.2% 33.5% 38.3% 216 569 38.0% 200 529 37.8°,, 33I%
RIO BLANCO 110.0%o 364% 63.6% 75 0% 45 5% 4 10 40.0% 4 8 50.0% 51 5%
RIO GRANDE 75.1% 54 0% 34.8% 374% 516% 63 127 49.6% 62 '29 481"4, 44.4"'.
ROUTT 0.0% 0.7% 00% na 1000% I _ 50.0% 0 3 0.0% 25.0%
SAGUACHE 36 7% 23 5% 30.0% 28 9% 28.3% 14 43 33.3% 9 38 23 7% 29.2%
SAN JUAN na 0.7% 00% 667% 66.7% 0 2 00% 0 2 00% 22.2%
SAN MIGUEL 0.0% 0.2% 00% 00% 0.0% 0 3 0.0% 0 4 00% 00%
SEDGWICK na 0.We 00% 0.00 na 0 I 0.0% 0 I 0,0% 0.(1%
SUMMIT 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0 5 00% 0 5 00% 0.0%
TELLER 59.3% 800% 45.5% 43 8% 45.7% 14 32 43 8% 16 34 47.1% 52.1%
WASHINGTON 00% 333% 100.0% 313% 100.0% 0 3 0.0% - 2 100.0% 524%
WELD 32.4% 300% 27.2% 29 1% 31.1% 75 223 336% 65 202 32 2% 30.8%
YUMA 20.0% 400% 500% 337% 42.1% 7 21 33.3% II 17 647% 4O5%
STATE 34.6% 362% 32.5% 32 5% 33.9% 3,378 9,576 35.3% 3,319 9,260 35 8% 34 4%
participation.xls-6/2/99 .,
.
FEDERAL WORK PARTICIPATION RATES FOR FFY YEAR 1998-99 FOR TWO-PARENT FAMILIES
Participation Rate for March 1999 Participation Rate for April 1999
Oct 1998 Nov 1998 Dec 1998 Jan 1999 Feb 1999 Mar 1999 Apr 1999 YID
I Average
rate rate rate rate rate numerator denominator rate numerator denominator rate rate
ADAMS 15.09' 570% 35.7% 35.7% 44.4% 4 9 44,1% I 6 16.7% 34 69',
ALAMOSA 40.0% 2O0% 16.7% 00% 12.5% I ID 1011% 6 10 60.0% 227%
ARAPAHOE 125% 21.1% 30.0% 2O0% 31 0% 5 25 20.,1% 9 25 36.0% 24.8%
ARCIIULETA na 11:0.0% 0.0% na 100.0% I I 10O0% 0 I O0% 60.0%
BACA na na na na na 0 0 na 0 0 na nu
BENT na nu nu nu 0 0% 2 2 100 3 3 100.096 66.755
BOULDER 45.8% 31.8% 23.8% 263% 263% 4 23 174% 5 25 20.0% 27.4%
CIIAFFEE na na na 00% 40.0% 2 5 40.0% 1 3 33 3% 2834,.
CHEYENNE nu na na na nu 0 0 na 0 0 na na
CLEAR CREEK nu nu na nu nu 0 0 0,1 0 0 as na
CONDOS 66.7% M14% 23.1% 200% 13.3% 3 18 16.7% 4 I7 23 5% 297%
COST]LLA 50 0% 25.0% 33 3% 60.0% 0O% 0 8 0.0% 2 8 25 0% 276"v
CROWLEY 100.0% 1000% 66.7% 100.0% 0.0% 0 3 0.0% 0 3 0.0°6 52 4%
CUSTER 0.0% 00% 0O% 00% 00% 0 4 0.0% 0 4 0O% 0O%
DELTA 8O0% 62.5% 44.4% 33.3% 33 3% 4 6 66 7% 5 7 71.4% 560%
DENVER 25.7% 28J% 212% 31 0% 26 3% 20 72 27.8% 16 56 28 6% 284%
DOLORES na na na 0 0% O0% 0 0 na o n na 0 09.
DOUGLAS 1000% 3:3% 75.0% 0 0% nu 0 0 nu 0 0 na 52 1%
EAGLE na na nu na na 0 0 na 0 0 na na
ELBERT 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 00% 0O% 0 2 O0% 0 0.0% 14 3%
El.PASO 656% 62.8% 88.2% 92.0% 89.0% 79 92 85.9% 80 92 870% 81.5%
FREMONT 333% 65.2% 60.0% 76.9% 52 6% 15 22 68.2% 10 20 500"6 58 6%
GARIIELD 857% 57.1% 2110% 33.3% 50O% I 3 333% I 4 25.09',. 43.5%
GILPIN nu nu nu 00% nu 0 I 0.0"51 0 0 110% 0 0%
•
GRAND nu as na na nu 0 0 na II 0 na na
GUNNISON na 0.0% 100.0% 100.0% 500% 0 I 0.0% 2 4 50096 50096
IIINSDALE nu na n4 nu nu 0 0 na 0 0 na na
IIUERFANO 11.1% 30.0% 33.3% 14.3% 27.3% I 9 11.1% I 9 11.1°5 197%
JACKSON na 0.0% 00% 100.0% 0.0% 0 I 0.0% 0 I 0.0% 167%
JEFFERSON 25 0% 22.6% 256% 18.2% 188% 7 51 137% 16 56 286% 21.8%
KIOWA na na nu nu na 0 0 no 0 3 na nu
KIT CARSON na na na na na 0 0 nu 0 ) na na
LAKE na ua 0.0% nu na 0 I O0% 0 I 0.0% 0.0%
LA PLATA 30.0% 250% 33.3% 250% 00% I 6 16.7% I o 167% 21.0%
LARIMER 750% 38 5% 40.0% 42 9% 25.0% 8 19 42.1% 12 18 66.7% 47296
LAS ANIMAS 667% 375% 16.7% 22.2% 16.7% 4 15 267% 15 13 3% 2859E
LINCOLN nu na na na na 0 0 na 0 0 na na
LOGAN na ou na nu na 0 0 net 0 1 00% 0.0%
MESA 526% 389% 26.7%, 36.8% 462% 12 25 48O% 6 '.I 28.69a 39746
MINERAL 00% 0.Y/ 0.0% 0.0% nn 0 0 nu 0 0 na 0.0%
MOFFAT na 0.3% 0.0% 40.0% 429% 1 6 167% 0 I 0.0% 166%
MONTEZUMA 28.6% 364% 25O% 33.3% 55.6% 6 10 60.0% 5 14 35.7% 392%
MONTROSE 0.0% 00% 0.0% 25.0% 0.0% 0 4 O0% 1 3 33.3% 83%
MORGAN 66 A5/„ 500% 0.0% 40O% 20.0% 5 9 556% 3 5 60O% 41 7%
OTERO 14.3% 375% '88% 308% 26.7% 9 17 52.9% 8 14 57.1°% 34.0°%
OURAY no na na na na 0 0 nu 0 II na flu
PARK na oa na na na 0 0 na 0 0 na na
PHILLIPS na oa na nu nu 0 0 na 0 II na nu
PITKIN nu Cu na nu na 0 0 na 0 0 na na
PROWERS 0.0% O0% 0.0% 100O% 0.0% 2 _ 10O0% 3 333% 33.3%
PUEBLO 29.4% 58 8% 28.6% 36.8% 35.3% 5 19 263% 3 13 23,1% 340%
RIOBLANCO na I na no na 0 I O0% 0 I O0% O1N0
RIO GRANDE 60.0% 26.7% 24 1% 30 8% 44.4% 10 20 50.0% 7 22 35.0% 38.7%
ROUTT na ra nu na na 0 0 na 0 na na
SAGUACHE 333% O0% 0 14 3% 00% 0 7 0.0% 0 8 0.0% 6.8%
SAN JUAN nu na na na nu 0 0 nu 0 nu na
SAN MIGUEL na nu nu na na 0 0 nu 0 1, na na
SEDGWICK na na na na nu 0 0 nu 0 0 na na
SUMMIT nu na na na nu 0 0 nn 0 ,. na nu
TELLER na 50.0/a 500/ 333% 33.3% 6 16.7% 2 a 133% 36.1%
WASHINGTON 0.0% 0.11% na na nu 0 2 0,0% 0 I 0,0% 00%
WELD 667% 40O% 66.7% 167% 42.9% I I 1000% 0 u na 555%
YUMA nu nu nu no 100.0% 0 I 0.0% 0 n na 500%
STATE 41.1% 38.8% 39.5% 40.8% 38.6% 218 539 404% 215 508 42.3% 40 2%
•
participationxls-6/2/99 nom,.,,I
Hello