Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout971185.tiff#‘094 _ 1110e. COLORADO Weld County Referral March 19, 1997 The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review: Applicant Laurel Johnson Case Number USR-1146 Please Reply By April 9, 1997 Planner Kern Keithley Project Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit for a home business (Concrete Cutting) and a storage building for trucks and trailers utilized in the home business in the A (Agricultural) zone district. Legal Location Parcel Number SE -622 located in part of the SE4 of Section. 22, T6N, R67W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. North of and adjacent to Weld County Road 66 (Eastman Park Drive), east of State Highway 257. 0807 22 000067 The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions regarding the application, please call the Current Planner associated with the request. Weld County Planning Commission Hearing (if applicable) May 6, 1997 We have reviewed the request and find that it does / does not comp/y with our Comprehensive Plan We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. See attached letter. Comments: a gr.-n Date V Signature Agency /i/c7 •Weld County Planning Dept. ♦1400 N. 17th Ave. Greeley, CO. 80631 44970) 353-6100 ext.3540 •(970) 352-6312 fax 971185 FIELD CHECK FILING NUMBER: USR-1146 DATE OF INSPECTION: Cr?? 7 APPLICANT'S NAME: Laurel Johnson CURRENT PLANNER: Kerri Keithley REQUEST: Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit for a home business (Concrete Cutting) and a storage building for trucks and trailers utilized in the home business in the A (Agricultural) zone district. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SE -622 located in part of the SE4 of Section 22, T6N, R67W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: North of and adjacent to Weld County Road 66 (Eastman Park Drive), east of State Highway 257. LAND USE N /p E °e , ' ( ,� f� e la,.. g .St '%—ru. to S L' " ""t) W ZONING: N A (Agricultural) E A (Agricultural) S A (Agricultural) W A (Agricultural) COMMENTS • LA CAA.- Q P.C. Member 971185 RECEIVED MAR 2 0 1997 r& 1*1 1111De. COLORADO Weld County Referral March 19, 1997 The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review: Applicant Laurel Johnson Case Number USR-1146 Please Reply By April 9, 1997 Planner Kerri Keithley Project Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit for a home business (Concrete Cutting) and a storage building for trucks and trailers utilized in the home business in the A (Agricultural) zone district. Lega/ SE -622 located in part of the SE4 of Section 22, T6N, R67W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. Location North of and adjacent to Weld County Road 66 (Eastman Park Drive), east of State Highway 257. Parcel Number 0807 22 000067 The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions regarding the application, please call the Current Planner associated with the request. Weld County Planning Commission Hearing (if applicable) May 6, 1997 ❑ We have reviewed the request and find that it does / does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan ❑ We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. gSee attached letter. Comments: Date Signature Agency Weld County Planning Dept. 41400 N. 17th Ave. Greeley, CO. 80631 •(970) 353-6100 ext.3540 4(970) 352-6312 fax a5-91 971185 fez lURe COLORADO mEmORAnDUm To From Subject: Kerri Keithley, Current Planner Date March 27, 1997 Don Carroll, Project Administrator USR-1146, Laurel Johnson etec The Weld County Public Works Department has reviewed this proposal; the following comments are recommended for any approval: I visited the site and have the following comments: 1. WCR 66 (Eastman Park Drive) has been annexed by the City of Windsor at this location. Please contact Dennis Wagner at the City of Windsor to verify adequate access to the facility. 2. Steve Smith, P.E., who is working with Rocky Mountain Consultants, indicated in his letter dated February 21, 1997, that he would submit additional information upon request. I have received the technical backup and hydrology calculations required for the storm water drainage. I have reviewed the calculations and find no conflict. 3. Off -site parking appears to be adequate for the existing buildings and proposed employees. 4. The Weld County Transportation Plan is identifying WCR 66 as a Collector status, which requires a total of 80 feet of right-of-way. I recommend that the City of Windsor request an additional 10 feet of right-of-way dedication through the property to accommodate future widening of this section of road. cc: Commissioner Harbert Dennis Wagner, City of Windsor USR-1146 planl5 I Ay Planning Dept. MAR 2 8 1997 971185 MEMORANDUM VUDc COLORADO TO: Kerni Keithley, W.C. Planning DATE: April 8, 1997 FROM: Sheble McConnellogue W.C. Health Department CASE NUMBER: USR-1146 NAME: Johnson, Laurel Environmental Protection Services has reviewed this proposal; the following conditions are recommended to be part of any approval: 1) All liquid and solid wastes shall be stored and removed for final disposal in a manner that protects against surface and groundwater contamination on all job sites. 2) No permanent disposal of waste shall be permitted at this site or any other job site. 3) Waste materials shall be handled, stored, and disposed in a manner that controls fugitive dust, blowing debris and other potential nuisance conditions. 4) The septic system has been reviewed by a Colorado Registered Professional Engineer. Any septic system within the 100 year flood plain shall comply with the Weld County Individual Disposal System Regulations Flood Plain Policy. In accordance with the Colorado I.S.D.S. Regulations, no septic system shall be installed with in the floodway the typical operational life of a septic system is 15 to 20 years. After this time period the lots would likely be developed with out -buildings, corrals, etc. It has been the Department's experience that after development there is not adequate area for replacement systems. Therefore, the Department encourages the applicant to designate an appropriate area on the parcel for a replacement septic system. 5) Restrooms in the house must be available to employees. SM/rb-2007 .i„ Planning Depi. APR 1 7 1997 971185 ;COLORADO flhioRAflDUrn To From Subject: Jeff Stoll Date October 14, 1994 Pam Smith, Environmental Specialist I.S.D.S. Flood Plain Policy Septic systems will not be allowed toibe located in the floodway. Septic systems will be allowed in the flood plain, but the system must be installed in a manner as to prevent the infiltration of groundwater into the septic tank and to prevent the release of sewage from the tank during a flood event. If the tank is above the flood plain elevation, no special installation requirements would be necessary. If the tank is not above the flood plain elevation then the access to the tank manhole lids must be covered with 20 mil PVC and sealed with plumbers cement. When the seal is broken, i.e. the tank .s opened for pumping, etc., the tank must be re -sealed prior to backfilling again. A backflow preventer must also be installed in the effluent line between the tank and the absorption field. All other percolation and suitable soil criteria must be met for a conventional septic system to be installed. For inspection purposes, the materialslto seal the manhole lids must be on site. The manholes arc not required to be sealed at the time of inspection in order to allow for the inspection of tee's in the tank. 971185 Hello