The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About980485.tiff St. Vrain Valley School District RE-1J ,395 South Pratt Parkway • Longmont • CO • 80501-6499 y planning ue 303-776-6200/449-4978 • FAX 303-682-7343 December 29, 1997 Weld Count JAN 0 51998 Shani County Planner Weld gr�jf C 1400 N. 17th Ave. RE E Greeley, CO 80631 RE: Summit Peaks Estates Planned Unit Development Change of Zone Application Dear Shani: Thank you for referring the Summit Peaks Estates Planned Unit Development Change of Zone Application to the School District. The projected student impact upon the St. Vrain Valley School District of 12 new single-family lots on 76 acres is a total of 8 students. Any students living in this subdivision would attend Mead Elementary School, Mead Middle School, and Skyline High School under the present school boundaries. However, due to potential growth in these schools this development and other existing developments in this feeder could be placed in another attendance area in the future. Bus transportation would be required. THIS PROPOSED DEVELOP 1995-97 DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS* Building Oct. 96 Student Projected Over Total # of Total Cum. Over Cap W/ Capacity • n - Impact Enrollment CAW, Proj. Stdnts° Enrollment 95-97 Day Elementary 456 537 4 541 Yes 2288 2829 Yes (-2373) ddle 349 328 2 330 No 1032 1362 Yes (-1013) High 1299 1191 2 1193 No 1216 2409 Yee (-1110) 8 4536 (SEATS AVAIL.) ° Qt@o& @Jm pr4oc40d eemd®Dne yO@Od@ Ow Rho. ® s®D @@O b1440m1d•lu ©s 'r©ev &OO pr©po@od a7®m©Oopmm©we® (V00E-fl00MM The District is on record as not opposing growth so long as the growth is planned and is manageable from a student enrollment stand point. While this development does not impact the middle or high school capacities, the elementary school is already over capacity. In addition, there are other approved developments in these attendance areas which will, together with this proposal, have a significant cumulative impact on these schools. As the volume of developments increases in the Mead Elementary area with no alleviation of the existing overcrowded conditions, the ability to provide the same quality education for these new students that is provided students in other areas becomes increasingly difficult. The District would typically oppose this development because it adds to the enrollment of an already overcrowded school. However, the District has had conversations with the developer regarding the implementation of separate agreement to mitigate the impacts. The developer has ndicated a willingness to enter into such an agreement. If this were to be accomplished there would be no opposition from the School District. A separate fee would be assessed, per the attached chart, prior to obtaining a building permit from the County. Our office will notify you of the completion of this agreement and will issue receipts that would be presented at the time of building permit applications. Please let me know of any questions. Sincerely, , . Scott Toillion, AICP Planning Specialist 980485 Z-57O "Excellence - Our Only Option" l� 0 2 2 a W U) Y R a E E d G 3 C ? N, r C co A A c V CO y 0- U V Q.-0 0, 0 0 0 0 o c = —Ts .- t T 7 J Lo- mi. ui a) , 69 EA Cu cu 0) 6N9 C ,� 0 : C .0 0 0 0 70 uj J = O O O C a C C.) �c `o m - Ca C I 0 .0 lC4 A p w IL M N in lo m 1 W J R Cl) = 0 to 0 CI t= 5 4 o r N v 0en c ° J c }' o a U N N — a C 3 ca C t n N C N CO g r w a' o w o «: m V to N V' ao N. V N t y 'v 41 co r co yr O O) CO vA . N >- O It O — O N N. ,CO. a` L 1 a) 'E � N N N C� ' r r r 4) Z 'o N .Z' >. u.0 0 a) m m m a) a) Zil E C To F3/ , w I o c H Cl) CO N. u rn _d rn .c N X W N T RECEIVED / a DEC 2 2 1997 fWeld County Planning Dept. , . ' JAN 0 9 1998 Weld County Referral C. R C E I y E December 18, 1997 COLORADO V C The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review: Applicant Doug and Diana Case Number Z-510 Cummings/Layor Kaylor Please Reply By January 9, 1998 Planner Shani L. Eastin Project Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) to PUD for two(2) residential lots zoned A (Agricultural) and ten (10) residential lots zoned E(Estate) for a total of 12 lots. Legal S2 of the 5W4 of Section 7,T3N, R68W of the 6th P.M.,Weld County, Colorado. Location 1207 07 000034North of and adjacent to Weld County Road 34; east of and adjacent to Weld County Road 1. Parcel Number 1207 07 000034 The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions regarding the application, please call the Current Planner associated with the request. Weld County Planning Commission Hearing(if applicable) February 3, 1998 ❑ .We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan ❑ We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 02..--5<attached letter. Comments: Signature �� _ \D, ,\ C'1 Date I 8 Agency �tc . � ); P , ,rE YJiS C *Weld County Planning Dept. O1400 N. 17th Ave.Greeley, CO. 80631 O(970)353-6100 ext.3540 O(970) EXHIBIT 980485 1 z-so # 7 Mou"7"'" MOUNTAIN VIEW FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Administrative Office: 9119 County Line Road •Longmont, CO 80501 I/ �-j)■ (303) 772-0710 Metro (303) 666-4404 FAX (303) 651-7702 vivo January 7, 1998 Ms. Shani Eastin, Current Planner Weld County Planning Department 1400 North 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Ms. Eastin: I have reviewed the Development Guide and zoning request pertaining to the Summit Peaks Estates, located north and adjacent to Weld County Road 34 and east of Weld County Road 1 (Case Number: Z-510). The property named is within the boundaries of the Mountain View Fire Protection District and receives fire protection from the District. At this time, the Fire District does not actually support the development as the Development Guide suggests. What the Fire District has said is that it does not object to the proposed subdivision, provided the development is able to meet the requirements of the Fire District for subdivisions. The current plan submittal does not meet the requirements of the Fire District for subdivisions. The Fire District has the following comments with regard to the proposed subdivision: • All applicable codes as they pertain to water supply, fire hydrant locations, street widths and designs, and fire department access must be met. • A minimum fire flow of 1,000 gallons per minute, measured at a residual pressure or 20 pounds per square inch, is required for one- and two-family dwellings not exceeding 3,600 gross square feet. All other buildings (including larger one- and two-family dwellings) require a minimum £ire flow of 1,500 gallons per minute and may require more depending on the building size and type of construction as per Appendix III-A of the Uniform Fire Code. The development guide indicates Longs Peak Water District has been consulted and has evaluated the design of the water system to meet the requirements of the Mountain View Fire District and that a letter confirming the availability of water service is attached. It needs to be pointed out that this letter actually states that no specifics on available fire flows have been identified at this time. The current plan submittal does not show how water supply for fire protection will be provided or that what the available fire flows are for the site. This issue needs to be resolved before the Fire District can support the development. • The Fire District does not generally approve of dead-end access roads in excess of 750 feet in length. Both access roads are in excess of 1,000 feet in length. This is another issue that needs to be resolved before the Fire District can support the development. Station 1 Station 2 Station 3 Station 4 Station 5 Station 6 Station 7 9119 Cnty Line Rd. 10971 WCR 13 P.O.Box 575 P.O.Box 11 10911 Dobbin Run P.O.Box 866 P.O.Box 40 Longmont,CO Longmont,CO 299 Palmer Ave. 8500 Niwot Road Lafayette,CO 600 Briggs 100 So.Forest St. 80501 80504 Mead.CO 80542 Niwot,CO 80544 80026 Erie,CO 80516 Dacono,CO 80514 980485 Ms. Shani Eastin January 6, 1998 Page Two • A final site plan showing the configuration of streets, the street design criteria, the location of fire hydrants, the size of water mains and available fire flows must be submitted to the Fire District for review and approval. • If each of the residential dwellings are required to be provided with a residential fire sprinkler system meeting the requirements of NFPA 13D (this would need to be indicated on the recorded plat and in the approved covenants), the required fire flow for fire protection and requirements for fire apparatus may be reduced. The Fire District reserves the right to make further comments as the project proceeds. We appreciate being involved in the planning process. Should you have any questions, please contact me at(303) 772-0710. Since rely, , LuAn n Penfold Fire Marshal LMP/lp cc: project file file Ip01.03.98 380485 H6T Weld Cou WIlD my Referral Weld County Planning Deft December 18, 1997 C. COLORADO JAN 0 91998 EiVED The Weld County Departmen in Services has received the following item for review: Et Applicant Doug and Diana Case Number Z-510 Cummings/Layor Kaylor Please Reply By January 9, 1998 Planner Shani L. Eastin Project Change of Zone from A(Agricultural) to PUD for two (2) residential lots zoned A (Agricultural) and ten (10) residential lots zoned E(Estate) for a total of 12 lots. Legal S2 of the 5W4 of Section 7,T3N, R68W of the 6th P.M.,Weld County, Colorado. Location 1207 07 000034North of and adjacent to Weld County Road 34; east of and adjacent to Weld County Road 1. Parcel Number 1207 07 000034 The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions regarding the application, please call the Current Planner associated with the request. Weld County Planning Commission Hearing(if applicable) February 3, 1998 ❑ .We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan 0 We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. Er5ee attached letter. Comments: Signature ✓2/A Date / / 1 9 ,r Agency % - *Weld County Plannin Dept. O1400 N. 17th Ave.Greeley, CO. 80631 O(970)353-6100 ext.3540 0(97 980485 I Z-6fa dr /o Longmont Soil Conservation District 9595 Nelson Road, Box D-Longmont, CO 80501 -(303) 776-4034 Weld County Planning Department 1400 N. 17th Ave Greeley, Co 80631 Weld County Planning Dept. January 7, 1998 JAN 0 9 1998 RE: Doug &Diana Cununings/Layor I{aylor RECEIVED This request is to change zoning regulations from Ag. to a PUD consisting of 12 lots on 75,75 acres. The property is presently non-irrigated wheatgrass. The soils on the site are: Nunn clay loam- severe limitations for roads and dwellings without basements. Also severe limitations for septic tank absorption because of slow percolation Wiley-Colby complex-high wind erosion potential that needs to be addressed during the construction phase. Also moderate to severe limitations for dwellings with and without basements and moderate limitations for septic tank absorption. The species of trees that are planned for the wind break are not the best for this area. After checking with the Cob. State Forest Service they would suggest Rocky Mtn. Juniper and Ponderosa Pine. Bristlecone Pine are for higher elevations. We would suggest that on the areas that have no grass that dryland native pasture mix be seeded. It would be beneficial to interseed this same mix into the present wheatgrass and any areas that are disturbed during construction. The Longmont Soil Conservation District would like to see a site specific inspection before any construction is started. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the conservation issues concerning this site. Sincerely, Luke Stromquist - Longmont SCD V- President CONSERVATION - DEVELOPMENT - SELF-GOVERNMENT 980485 12/30/1997 12:24 9705350831 TOWN OF MEAD PAGE 01 _ e Weld County Referral C December 18, 1997 COLORADO The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review: Applicant Doug and Diana Case Number Z-510 Cummings/Layer Kaylor Please Reply By January 9, 1998 Planner Shani L. Eastin Project Change of Zone from A(Agricultural)to PUD for two(21 residential lots zoned A (Agricultural)and ten (10) residential lots zoned E(Estate)for a total of 12 lots. Legal 52 of the 5W4 of Section 7,T3N, R68W of the 6th P.M.,Weld County,Colorado. Location 1207 07 000034North of and adjacent to Weld County Road 34;east of and adjacent to Weld County Road 1. Parcel Number 1207 07 000034 The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated Please reply by the above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions regarding the application, please call the Current Planner associated with the request. Weld County Planning Commission Hearing(if applicable) February 3, 1998 ❑ .We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan O We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. See attached letter. Comments: Signature l a1V(.J{ • WAA) � Date ia-,so.- -/ / Agency Wet annt' p *Weld County Planning ugio v1 flfgt f reeley,CO.8063 6(970)353-5100 ext.3540 4(970)3524312 fax DEC 3 01997 RECEIVED EXHIBIT 980485 z-5/0 12/30/97 11:24 TX/RX NO.9605 y/� 12/30/1997 12:24 9705350831 TOWN OF MEAD PAGE 02 Town of Mead Planning Commission P.O. Box 626 Mead, CO 80542-0626 December 30, 1997 Weld County Planning Department 1400 North 17thg Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Reference: Weld County Referral Z-510, Doug and Diana Cummings, Larry Kaylor Dear Sir or Madame: We have reviewed the request and find that it does comply with our Comprehensive Plan. There are no conflicts with our interests. Previously my response indicated that this parcel falls within the Town of Mead's Area of Influence. I understand from Mr. and Mrs. Cummings that this comment provided some confusion. With all due respect. I must apologize for any problems this may have caused either the County of Weld or the applicants. Recently it was determined that the Mead Comprehensive Plan was recorded with the County of Weld but had not been reviewed by the County per CRS 31-23-206_ This will be resolved after the first of the year. Lastly, the Town of Mead appreciates the applicants' understanding of our schools needs and their voluntary participation in an agreement with the St. Vrain Valley School District for impact fees. It is hoped that these fees will be specifically earmarked for the schools that are utilized by this development and not placed within the school districts general fund. We request that the applicants carefully review the agreement with the school district for this requirement_ Again, thank you for referring this proposal for our consideration. Sincerely, MARGARET ,q WHIT Town of Mead Planning Commission Weld County Planning Dept. DEC 3 01997 RECEIVED 980485 12/30/97 11 :24 TX/RX N0.9605 P.002 RECEIVED DEC 2 2 1997 (it ‘'" Weld County plann Dept Weld County Referral ' December 18, 1997 0 JAN 0 81998 COLORADO REceive0 The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review: Applicant Doug and Diana Case Number Z-510 Cummings/Layor Kaylor Please Reply By January 9, 1998 Planner Shani L. Eastin Project Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) to PUD for two (2) residential lots zoned A (Agricultural) and ten (10) residential lots zoned E(Estate) for a total of 12 lots. Legal S2 of the SW4 of Section 7,T3N, R68W of the 6th P.M.,Weld County, Colorado. Location 1207 07 000034North of and adjacent to Weld County Road 34;east of and adjacent to Weld County Road 1. Parcel Number 1207 07 000034 The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions regarding the application, please call the Current Planner associated with the request. Weld County Planning Commission Hearing(if applicable) February 3, 1998 ❑ .We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan ❑ We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. A. See attached letter. Comments: Signature 1-)(44 / 5414g. i ivi4. D_ Date ( _ � _ 9 Agency ttt bstie I u.) et "�-��U *Weld County Planning Dept. *1400 N. 17th Ave.Greeley, CO.80631 O(970)353-6100 ext.3540 0(97 EJdt1IT I 980485 z-5/D is t‘ to t MEMORANDUM ' TO: Shani Eastin, Current Planner DATE: January A 6, 1998 o rapt FROM: Don Carroll, Engineering Administrator W� QKSo ti • SUBJECT: Z-510; Doug and Diana Cummings/Layor Kaylor JAN 0 81998 The Weld County Public Works Department has reviewed the change of zone from agricultural to a PUD; the following requirements are recommended to be a part of any approval: COMMENTS: I have no conflict with the change of zone to two residential lots zoned A (Agricultural) and ten residential lots zoned E (Estates) for a total of 12 lots. WCR 34, between WCRs 1 and 3, is designated as a local paved road with an existing right-of-way of 60 feet. The 1997 average daily traffic (ADT) count, at this location, was 976 vehicles, up from 286 vehicles per day from the 1994 count of 690. WCR 1 (County Line Road), adjacent to WCR 34, has an ADT count of 1,170 vehicles per day as of February, 1992. This is a "T" intersection and there are no future plans to expand west. The applicant is indicating the Homeowners Association will be responsible for the internal road system. The Site Improvements Agreement will be submitted with the filing of the final plat. REQUIREMENTS: All items should be completed and/or resolved before filing of the final plat. CROSS SECTION: The applicant needs to place, on the milar, a typical cross section identifying width of right-of-way, depth of base and asphalt, and width of driving lanes and shoulders. There are discrepancies between the written documentation in the packet and the drawing on the typical shoulders. The applicant should utilize 10.2.3 and 10.2.4, Geometric Design Standards and Road Structures, to develop an adequate cross section to carry the traffic within the PUD. CUL-DE-SAC: The applicant needs to identify and dimension a 50-foot radius at each cul-de-sac. ;380485 Page 2 STREET RADIUS: A 20-foot paved radius will be required at each intersection to accommodate adequate space for turning vehicles. STREET NAMES: Streets should have the same names of existing streets in the county or in adjacent counties or municipalities which are in alignment. They shall not be duplicates of streets named within the area. The applicant needs to supply street signs at each location to identify that particular street. ACCESS CODE: In my previous memo, using the State Highway Access Code 4.7.2, Deceleration Lanes for Right Turning Vehicles, I identified a right turn lane from WCR 34 at the main entrance to the subdivision. This turn lane was to try to incorporate a bus stop/mail pickup area. The applicant has indicated that the bus stops on WCR 34 and each individual lot will have their own mail pickup at their house. . DRAINAGE REPORT: A final drainage report will be required prior to the final plat. Please refer to Section 10.11 of the subdivision ordinance. The applicant has submitted a primary drainage report for Summit Peaks. The final drainage report should include engineering drawings, sizing of culverts, and drainage basins and structures. This report should be signed and stamped by a professional engineer. INTERNAL ROAD: All lot accesses, including lots 11 and 12 will utilize the internal road system. No direct access to WCRs 1 or 34 will be allowed. cc: Commissioner Webster Z-510 plan4 3 t0455 4Ittri" MEMORANDUM WIID TO: Shani L. Eastin, W. C. Planning DATE: January 14, 1998 0 FROM: Sheble McConnellogue W.C. Health Department • COLORADO CASE NUMBER: Z-510 NAME: Cummings, Doug & Diana/Layor, Kaylor Environmental Protection Services has reviewed this proposal, and in the application material it is stated that a multi-use riding arena and trails will be located in an open space area. Our department has a concern with the animal waste and pollutant runoff from precipitation. The following conditions are recommended to be part of any approval: 1) The applicant shall remove, handle,and stockpile manure from the livestock area in a manner that will prevent nuisance conditions. The manure piles shall not be allowed to exist or deteriorate to a condition that facilitates excessive odors, flies, insect pests, or pollutant runoff. 2) All liquid and solid wastes shall be stored and removed for final disposal in a manner that protects against surface and groundwater contamination. 3) No permanent disposal of wastes shall be permitted at this site. 4) Waste materials shall be handled, stored,and disposed in a manner that controls fugitive dust, blowing debris, and other potential nuisance conditions. 5) Fugitive dust shall be controlled on this site. 6) The maximum permissible noise level shall not exceed the residential limit of 55 db(A) as measured according to 25-12-102, Colorado Revised Statutes. 7) An individual sewage disposal system is required for each proposed home and shall be installed according to the Weld County Individual Sewage Disposal Regulations. The basic soil condition description shows a slow permeability and it is likely these systems will have a slow percolation which will require engineered septic systems. 8) The facility shall utilize the existing public water supply. 1. SM/vh 3272 weld Cri lrty Planning Dept. JAN 2 0 1993 r.; vED EXHIBIT 980485 a o 3 Hello