The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About950770.tiffpot; COLORADO mEmoRAnDum To From Subject Greg Thompson Planning Date Donald Carroll, Engineering SEP 1 6 1993 ►up�,� e^eaty Planning September 14, 1993 Y S Greenmill Sportsman Club USR-1031 The applicant is indicating that they have a dedicated right-of-way on WCR 3 to access the facility. The access road south of WCR 8 is on the section line. Weld County does not have an open and maintained road to the facility. The applicant is indicating two gravel parking areas. The largest one is 150'x400' with bathroom facilities. The smaller one is 150'x300'. The applicant is not indicating the number of users to use the parking facilities. Is the access road and the road within the facility going to be upgraded with gravel. The applicant is indicating no increased storm water runoff will be occurring since no improvement areas are planned. The existing drainage swells will not be touched in any way. cc: Commissioner Baxter File USR-1031 mgregl6.pds 950770 itot4; WIWDe. COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303) 353.3845, EXT. 3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 1400 N. 17TH AVENUE GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 "RECEIVED SEP 0 % 1993 September 2, 1993 CASE NUMBER: USR-1031 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from Greenmill Sportsman Club for a Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a recreational facility/shooting range in the A (Agricultural) zone district. The parcel of land is described as part of the SW4 of Section 20, T1N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is approximately 1/2 mile southeast of the intersection of Weld County Road 8 and Weld County Road 3. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by September 16, 1993 so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Greg Thompson, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: 3. We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5.4 - Please refer to the enclosed letter. Signed: ,06.$4,,QQ n t,.( Agency: Date: q, -11D-473 l GAY I"111a4(421.-t.-- 950770 *It COLORADO mEmoRAnDum Greg Thompson To Planning From Subject: Date September 13. 1993 Donald Carroll, Engineering Greenmill Sportsman Club USR-1031 This particular facility lays within the city limits of Erie. Also, the road access off from Weld County Road (WCR) 8 has been annexed by the City of Erie. WCR 8, at this particular point, is a half-and-half situation; half Erie and half Weld County. I feel the City of Erie should do the comments on this facility since it is inside the city limits and the access lays inside the city limits. cc: Commissioner Baxter File USR-1031 mgreg14.pds 950770 to WIDc. COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303) 353.3845, EXT. 3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 1400 N. 17TH AVENUE GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 'RECEIVED SEP 0 % V993 September 2, 1993 CASE NUMBER: USR-1031 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from Greenmill Sportsman Club for a Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a recreational facility/shooting range in the A (Agricultural) zone district. The parcel of land is described as part of the SW4 of Section 20, T1N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is approximately 1/2 mile southeast of the intersection of Weld County Road 8 and Weld County Road 3. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by September 16, 1993 so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Greg Thompson, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: 3. We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: Please refer to the enclosed letter. Signed: 1)bwo,P 2 Cai wa4 Agency: LG4tHua'1 Date: Cr—ID—ci3 950770 Abocr, IIlige COLORADO From mEmoRAnuum Greg Thompson, Current Planner Weld County Planning Date Jeffrey L. Stoll, Director, Environmental Health September 14, 1993 Subject Case Number: USR-1031 Name: Greenmill Sportsman Club Environmental Protection Services has reviewed this proposal; the following conditions are recommended to be part of any approval: 1. No permanent disposal of wastes shall be permitted at this site. 2. Wood shavings, saw dust, and waste materials shall be handled, stored, and disposed in a manner that controls fugitive dust, blowing debris, and other potential nuisance conditions. 3. Fugitive dust shall be controlled on this site. 4. The maximum permissible noise level shall not exceed the industrial limit of 80 dB(A), as measured according to 25-12-102, Colorado Revised Statutes. 5. Adequate toilet facilities shall be provided for the public. 6. An individual sewage disposal system consisting of a minimum of a vault privy, is required for the proposed facility and shall be installed according to the Weld County Individual Sewage Disposal Regulations. 7. The septic system is required to be designed by a Colorado Registered Professional Engineer if a system other than a vault privy is utilized. 8. All pesticides, fertilizer, and other potentially hazardous chemicals must be stored and handled in a safe manner. Reference 25-8-205.5 Colorado Water Quality Control Act and Rules and Regulations thereof. 9. Individual Sewage Disposal System permit must be finalized and approved by an Environmental Protection Specialist within one (1) year of the application date. JLS/1031.USR II SEP 1 6 1993 weld Peumy Planning 950770 /440(1.';., Pc. COLORADO September 2, 1993 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303) 353-3845, EXT. 3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 1400 N. 17TH AVENUE GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 SEP-31993 !IB1 I CASE NUMBER: USR-1031 Enclosed is an application from Greenmill Sportsman Club for a Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a recreational facility/shooting range in the A (Agricultural) zone district. The parcel of land is described as part of the SW4 of Section 20, T1N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is approximately 1/2 mile southeast of the intersection of Weld County Road 8 and Weld County Road 3. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and/ will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by! September 16, 199P so that we may give full consideration to your" recommendation. Please Call Greg Thompson, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. 2. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: 3. We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Signed: ''e/I Ef A 441_ (T ``✓1) Agency: Date: 9,1/5193 � SEP 15 1993 O� uthige boning TOWN OF ERIE 645 HOLBROOK P.O. BOX 100 ERIE. COLORADO 80516 LOCAL (303) 828-3843 METRO (303) 665-3555 September 13, 1993 Mr. Greg Thompson, Planner Department of Planning Services Weld County Administrative Offices 1400 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 RE: Weld County Referral Case Number USR-1031 Dear Mr. Thompson: The Town of Erie, Colorado would like to respond to the referral for the Greenmill Sportsman Club for a Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit. If Weld County approves this referral, the Town of Erie would like to see the following restrictions applied. 1. FAA approval as compatible with Tri County Airport. 2. Deny the five year variance request for renewal for Site Specific Development Plan use by Special Review requirement. Allow only yearly. 3. Have the Weld County Road 3 access checked. Town of Erie annexed this property two years ago. If you have any questions, please call. Sincerely, S oet.ah Erie Town Administrator SAH:js a.\wpwh\1at\aamtniat\1993\waw1annm POLICE DEPT. P.O. BOX 510 METRO (303) 449-3156 LOCAL (303) 828-3200 Weld rnunty Planning LONGMONT FIRE PROTECTION On Tj AT.4404 Wl�oc. COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303) 353-3845, EXT. 3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 1400 N. 17TH AVENUE GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 September 2, 1993 CASE NUMBER: USR-1031 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from Greenmill Sportsman Club for a Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a recreational facility/shooting range in the A (Agricultural) zone district. The parcel of land is described as part of the SW4 of Section 20, T1N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is approximately 1/2 mile southeast of the intersection of Weld County Road 8 and Weld County Road 3. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by September 16, 1993 so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Greg Thompson, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. 2. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: 3. We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. ✓/ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Signed:ny Agency: �`\�u�r*r.a .� .4c Date: C\_\v\_CC3 1 �r— wela wn...sy Mannino 950770 MOUNTAIN VIEW FIRE PRO , ECTION DISTRICT Administrative Office: 700 Weaver Park Road • Longmont, CO 80501 (303) 772-0710 Metro (303) 666-4404 September 14, 1993 Mr. Greg Thompson, Current Planner Weld County Department of Planning Services 1400 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 RE: USR-1031 Greenmill Sportsman Club Dear Mr. Thompson: I have reviewed the material sent to the Fire District that apply to this application. The Fire District has no objections to this proposal. The proposal does not indicate that any buildings are planned. If any buildings are planned for the site, the buildings and the site will need to comply with the adopted codes and standards of the Fire District. These standards include a requirement for providing the required fire flow to the buildings. This area typically does not have adequate water supplies to meet required fire flows. This will be a limitation on future construction on the site. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Charles E. Boyes Fire Prevention Specialist CC: Jerry Ward, Chief of the District William N. Bailey, Deputy Chief, Support Services Mark A. Lawley, Assistant Chief, Fire Prevention Station 1 9119 Cnty Line Rd. Longmont, CO 80501 Station 2 10971 WCR 13 Lorgmord, CO 80504 Station 3 P.O. Box 575 299 Palmer Ave. Used, CO 80542 Station 4 P.O. Box 11 8500 NSW Road Mod, 0080544 Station 5 10911 Dobbin Run Lafayette, CO 80026 Station 6 P.O. Box 666 BOO Briggs Erie. CO 80516 950770 station % P.O. Box 40 -- 100 So. Forest St. Oacono. CO 80514 WELD COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE Ed Jordan, Sheriff 910 10TH Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 (303) 356-4015 FAX (303) 353-8551 To Greg Thompson, Planning From Ed Jordan Date February 15, 1994 Subject: USR-1031 Attached please find recommendations of our range officer Bill Wagner. We would make these recommendations to you for your determination. If you or the range operators have questions contact me or Bill Wagner. My phone is 356-4015 ext. 4633, Deputy Wagner can be reached at 356-4015 ext.4171. 111 FEB 1 6 1994 rb ,.,...e.3 Planning 950770 INTER OFFICE MEMO TO: ADMINISTRATOR DILL FROM: DEP. B. WAGNER DATE: 021394 REF: SAFETY RECOMMENDATION USR-1031 SIR, IN REFERENCE TO YOUR REQUEST FOR A SAFETY RECOMMENDATION REGARDING THIS ISSUE, I HAVE LOOKED AT THE PROPOSAL AND WOULD HAVE TO MAKE THE FOLLOWING RECD ENDATIONS. 1. I DID NOT COME ACROSS ANY PLAN IN THE PROPOSAL FOR HOW THE GREENMILL SPORTSMAN'S CLUB PLANS TO REMOVE LEAD FROM THE SITE DURING THE TIME IT IS IN USE AND AFTER IT IS TURNED BACK INTO FARMLAND. ALL REPUTABLE RANGES THAT I HAVE BEEN TO HAVE A PLAN FOR THE REMOVAL OF BULLETS AND LEAD SHOT DURING USE AND AFTER THE RANGE CLOSES. 2. IN THEIR RULES FOR SHOOTING STEEL, THEY STATE A MININUM DISTANCE OF 7 YARDS FROM MUZZLE TO PLATE. I FEEL THAT THIS IS ILO CLOSE AND THE DIS- TANCE NEEDS TO BE A MININUM OF 10 YDS. THIS IS THE ACCEPTED DISTANCE THAT THE MANUFACTURERS OF STEEL TARC,EIS GENERALLY RECOMMEND. 3. IN THE PLAN IT STAPES A RANGE OFFICER WILL BE AVAILABLE WHEN NEEDED, IT DOES NOT EXPLAIN HOW ONE CAN BE CONTACTED IF A PROBLEM ARISES WHILE THE RANGE IS IN USE. I FEEL A RANGE OFFICER SHOULD BE THERE AT ALL TIMES DURING USE FOR THIS PURPOSE. 4. THE PLAN DOES NOT GIVE PROVISIONS FOR ANYONE'S ACCESSIBILITY IU A TELEPHONE, IF A EMERGENCY DOES ARISE, HOW WILL THE INVOLVED PEOPLE SUMMON HELP. 5. THE AREA THAT CONCERNS ME THE MOST IS THE SOUTH BERM OF THE 100 AND 200 YARD RANGES. IN LOOKING AT THE PLAT AND THE MAPS I COULD ONLY COME UP WITH A HEIGHT FOR THIS BERM AT APPROX. 21 FT. THIS IN AND OF ITSELF IS FINE, HOWEVER THERE IS A OIL FIELD ACCESS ROAD WHICH RUNS BEHIND THIS BERM. MAYBE I'M READING THE ELEVATION WRONG, BUT IT LOOKS IT) ME LIKE THE ROAD IS THE SAME HEIGHT AS THE lUP OF THE BERM. THE PLAN DOES STATE A PLAN FOR ANYTIME THE ROAD IS IN USE A SIGN WILL BE POSTED AT THE GATE STATING RANGE OPERATIONS ARE CLOSED WHILE THE WELTS ARE BEING SERVICED. I FEEL THIS ROAD SHOULD BE CLOSED ENTIRELY AS THE POTENTIAL FUR A PROBLEM OR MISCOMMUNICATION IS HIGH. 6. SOME PROVISION SHOULD BE IN PLACE TO CEASE FIRE AT ALL FIRING LINES WHEN- EVER ANYONE GOES DOWNRANGE TO CHANGE TARGETS OR FUR WHATEVER REASON. 7. SHOTGUN RULES 2,5,12, SHOULD RF INCORPORATED INTO THE RIFLE AND PISTOL RULES AS WELL. 8. ANOTHER AREA OF CONCERN IS THAT I DID NOT SEE A PROVISION IN THE RULES FOR ACTUAL INSPECTION OF THE BERMS PRIOR TO USE FOR ANY TYPE OF MATERIAL THAT MIGHT DEFLECT A BULLET OR CAUSE A RICOCHET. 9. HIGH POWER RIFLE RULE 7 AND 8 SHOULD BE INCLUDEll INTO THE SHOTGUN AND PIS- TOL RULES. 10. HIGH POWER RIFLE RULE 5 SHOULD ALSO BE IN THE SHOTGUN AND PISTOL RULES. 11. EYE AND EAR PROTECTION SHOULD BE MANDATORY FOR EVERYONE WHO IS ON OR NEAR ANY RANGE. PAGE 1 9'50'7'70 12. I FEEL THAT WHEN THE FUTURE DRILL SITE OPERATIONS GET UNDERWAY, THIS RANGE SHOULD BE CLOSED DOWN ENTIRELY UNTIL THESE DRILL SITES ARE COM- PLETED. IT IS ALSO AN AREA OF CONCERN OF MINE THAT THE FUTURE TANK BATTERY THAT WILL MOST LILLY BE PLACED THERE MAY STAND THE POTENTIAL FOR STRAY ROUNDS OR POTENTIAL RICOCHETS. TANK BATTERY SITES AND THE SURROUNDING EQUIPMENT SEEM TO TAKE A LOT OF ABUSE IN OTHER AREAS OF THE COUNTY. WHILE THE ABOVE GIVES 12 AREAS OF POTENTIAL PROBLEMS AS I SELL THEM, THEY ARE NOT ALL INCLUSIVE, AND TIE POSSIBILITY DOES EXIST THAT I MAY HAVE MISSED A POTENTIAL AREA OF CONCERN. OR FOR THAT MATTER, SOME OF THE THINGS I DO MENTION MAY HAVE SOLUTIONS ADDRESSED SOMEWHERE IN THE LEGAL TERMINOLOGY OF THE PROPOSAL. BILL WAGNER 950770 4*,It IIIIDe COLORADO mEmoRAnDUm Weld County Sheriff's Office February 7, 1994 To Date Greg Thompson, Current Planner From USR-1031 Subject: As a condition of approval for USR-1031, the Weld County Planning Commission has requested the Weld County Sheriff's Office review this case application and make a recommendation regarding safety at the proposed site. Please review the case file and offer a recommendation. If any questions arise, please call. Thank you for your assistance. P725711‘ FEB 1 6 1994 "Jr' "r;°.^;'a Manning �fll%%O Green Mill Sportsman's Club 2885 W. 128th Avenue, #1208 Denver, Colorado 80234 January 3, 1994 Greg Thompson Current Planner Department of Planning Services Weld County Administrative Offices 1400 N. 17th Avenue Greeley Colorado. Dear Mr. Thompson: Ref: USR 1031 I have enclosed a copy of the letter from the FAA as requested by the TOWN OF ERIE. We are still working on the access road situation, and will have to approach our membership for approval to proceed with out a waiver of the "Five Year Review". Sincerely, Robert M. Engl Secretary & Treasurer 950770 Please T or Print on Tn/s Form Corm Approved ()Mb ti'C.2 ik.:-C EMOVE GARB C'�a Notice of Proposed us Deportment or Ironspatoeon Construction or Alteration 3 Federal Aviation Administration Aeronautical Study �I � � Number 51 D` -BE. 1. Nature of Proposal 2. Complete Description of Structure A Type New Construction B. Class ® Permanent C. Work Schedule Dates Beginning 1 / 1 q q 4 Please describe, on a separate sheet of paper if necessary, the proposed construction or alteration. Alteration * II Temporary (Duration months) End A. For proposals involving transmitting stations, include frequency effective radiated power (ERP) and assigned of * If Alteration, provide previous FAA Aeronautical Study Number, if available -. all proposed or modified transmitters on the structure. (If 3A. Name, address, and telephone number of individual, company corporation, etc. proposing the construction or alteration. (Number. Street, City, State, and Zip Code) GREEN MILL SPORTSMAN CLUB ROBERT BOTTORFF - PRESIDENT 1850 Garfield Ave. Louisville, Coloaado 80027 1 303 1 666 6393 not known, give frequency band and maximum ERP). B. For proposals involving overhead wire, transmission lines, etc., include the size.and the configuration of the wires and their supporting structures. C. For all proposals, include site orientation, dimensions, and construction materials of the proposed or altered structure. D. Optional— Describe the type of obstruction marking -and lighting system desired for your structure. The FAA will Area ode Te epnone Number recommend appropriate marking and lighting for the in with the standards of Advisory 38. Name, address and telephone number of proponent's representative, if different than 3A. above. Phillip M. Young 4721 Anne Place Erie , Colorado 80516 1 303 1 82S-4034 structure accordance Circular AC 70/7460-1. An FAA marking and lighting recommendation will reflect the minimum acceptablelevet of conspicuity necessary to -warn pilots of the presence of an object. However, the FAA, under certain circumstances, will not object to the use of a system (such as a medium intensity flashing white light system or a dual lighting system) other than the recommended standard. Area Code Telephone Number 4. Location Of Structure 5. Height and Elevation lto nearest total A. Coordinates l !o ^uondr dins of seconds, B. Nearest City or Town and State Fria, fn C. Nearestpublic or military airport. heliport, flightpark, or seaplane base Tr Airpnrt A Elevation of site above -mean sea level. 5070 Latitude 0) d O3 " 40 2 -2-o- (1 I. Distance to 48 1 Mile (1 j. Distance from structure to nearest point of nearest runway 1.5 Miles B. Height of structure including all appurtenances and lighting above ground or water. 2O J Longitude 0l r1 a 105 2 0 • 40. Source of coordinate information for item 4A. above. nUSGS 7.5' Other ps±ouad Chart ❑Survey Specify (2). Direction to 46 Northwest (2). Direction from structure to airport Southwest C. Overall height above mean sea level (A + el 5090 4E. Describe, on a separate sheet of paper, the location of the site with respect to highways, streets, airports, prominent terrain features, existing structures, etc. Attach a copy of a U.S. Geological Survey quadrangle map 7.5 minute series (or equivalent) showing the construction site. If available, attach a copy of a documented site survey with the surveyor's certification. Indicate the reference datum of the coordinates, 4 known. Other 4/NAD 27 ❑ NAD 83 ❑ Specify FAILURE TO PROVIDE ALL REQUESTED INFORMATION MAY DELAY PROCESSING OF YOUR NOTICE Notice is required by Pan 77 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 C.F.R. Part 77) pursuant to Section 1101 of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958, as amended (49 U.S.C. app. § 15011. Persons who knowingly and willtully violate the Notice requirements of Part 77 are subject to a civil penalty -of 51,000 per day until the notice is received, pursuant to Section 901)2) of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958. as amended (49 U.S.C. app 9 1471)s)) as well as the fine (criminal penalty) of not more than 5500 for the first offense and not more than 52,000 for subsequent offenses: pursuant to Seaton 902(a) of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958, as amended (49 U.S.C. app § 1472(a)). I HEREBY CERTIFY that all of the above statements made by me are true, complete, and correct to the best of my knowledge. In addition, I agree to obstruction mark and/or light the structure in accordance with established marking & lighting standards as necessary. Date 9/27/93 Typed or Printed Name and Title of Person Filing Notice Phillip M. Young, Board Member Signal � /��g /21 t • t _.„--C/urn FOR FAA USE ONLY FAA will either re this loch or 54 sue a se ate acknowled�. � The Proposal: Supplemental Notice of Construction, FAA Form 7460-2, is required any time the project is abandoned. or ❑ Does not require a notice to FAA. ❑ At least 48 hours before the start of construction. not identified as an obstruction under any standard of FAR, Part 77, is g❑-Wimin five days after the construction reaches its grease height Open C, and would not be a hazard to navigation. unles.t. / This determination expires on t ❑is identified as an obstruction under the standards of FAR, Part 77, la) extended, revised or terminated by the issusing ngauthority office; Subpart C, but would not be a hazard to navigation. Co) the construction is subject to the licensing FCConor of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and an application fora construction permit is made to the on before the above expiration date. In such cases the determination ❑ expires on the date prescribed by the FCC (or completion of construction, or on the date the FCC denies the application. Should be obstruction ❑ marked 5 lighted per FAA NOTE: Request for extension of the edecove period of this determination must be postmarked or delivered to the issuing office Advisory Circular 70n460-1, Chapters at least 15 days prior to the expiration date. ❑ Obstruction marking and lighting are not necessary. If the structure is subject to the licensing authority of the FCC, a copy of this determination will be sent to tat agency. Remarks q VAt/ eL U/3 /e L1L ES sv.r#ger ,t,nc - £N04dl/ ewoeF'0 it) /9E/LvoC/ilydT/LPL 424T/v,ri-1. the coordinates for any NAD 83 Coordina}}p�� ft (Use recortasxwdencewimmeFAAI Latitude 17U / / o r Oa 9y a Longitude D /0,5 oa. 0I 513 !Sauna in Data / j :AA i-3rttrr• •0-1 (1.931 e Carbons Hello