HomeMy WebLinkAbout990025.tiff / '
SUMMARY OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
Tuesday, January 5, 1999
A regular meeting of the Weld County Planning Commission was held on January 14, 1999, in the County
Commissioners' Hearing Room Room#101), Weld County Centennial Building, 915 10th Street, Greeley,
Colorado. The meeting was called to order by Chair, Marie Koolstra, at 1:35 p.m.
ROLL CALL
;7i
Marie Koolstra Present
Jack Epple Present O `-
Cristie Nicklas —4r'�
Fred Walker Present rn
Bruce Fitzgerald Absent a N "n
Michael Miller Present r: oc ' o
Stephan Ms kray Present `,ry
PresentW ?-<
Arlan co
Bryant Gimlin Present
Also Present: Julie Chester, Planner, Eric Jerman, Planner, Ben Patton, Planner, Sheri Lockman, Planner,
Sharyn Frazer, Code Compliance, Department of Planning; Lee Morrison, Assistant County Attorney; Don
Carroll, Public Works; Sheble McConnellogue, Trevor Jiricek, Health Department; Wendi Inloes, Secretary.
The summary of the last regular meeting of the Weld County Planning Commission held on December 15,
1999, was approved as read.
CASE NUMBER: USR-1206 (Continued from the Dec. 15 1998, hearing)
APPLICANT: Andesite Rock Company
PLANNER: Eric Jerman
4
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SE4 of Section 3, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado.
REQUEST: Site Specific Development Plan and Use by Special Review Permit for a Mining Operation.
LOCATION: North of and adjacent to State Hwy 119 and west of and adjacent to 1-25.
Eric Jerman, Department of Planning Services, presented Case USR-1206. Preliminary comments were
replaced with new comments at the beginning of the hearing. Eric stated the Department of Planning is
recommending approval of the application, along with the Conditions of Approval and Development Standards.
Eric then read the recommendation into the record.
Cristie Nicklas asked about prime farm ground being taken out of production, and that the application does
state that the area is in corn and alfalfa irrigated production currently. Eric explained that this is correct, but
the applicants will be replacing all of the top soil when mining is completed, and the area will be left as it was
originally found.
Dana Brand, representative with Rocky Mtn. Consultants, gave an overview of the application. Dana
explained on maps the five phases the mining will go through. The total acres with the expansion will be
approximately 232 acres. The ground is in MUD area, and will be reclaimed for future development. They
will be mining in sections and reclaimed as they go, so that portions of the site will be reclaimed long before
the next phase is opened. The only area that will not be reclaimed will be the first site, and will be reclaimed •
as wetlands. The development of the reclamation plan is in conjunction with surrounding property owners,
based on the depth and configuration of the gravel resource, and also is based on the MUD standards. Dana
stated they are in agreement with the majority of the Conditions of Approval, with the exception of the
requirement of Army Corp permits, as there may be none required. Eric said that as long as the wording
stated that the wetlands would not be mined without appropriate permits, he would agree to a change.
C.
990025
SUMMARY OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
January 5, 1999
Page 2
Mike Miller asked how they will be,getfing materials across the wetlands without disturbing them. Dana stated
that they will be using a conveyor;and if needed will get the appropriate permits. Dana then explained that
permits are needed when you are filling, in a process by scraping and pushing. If you excavate without filling
the area again, no permits are required. Mike then asked what is currently on the site. Dana explained that
there is a concrete plant currently, which will remain, and the batch plant site has been designated.
Man Marrs asked about what plans they have for WCR 7.5. Dana explained that Andesite does not own this
property, the Rademacher Family Partnership owns it, and they are currently in the PUD process with the
Planning Department. They are requesting that all issues regarding the location and future width of right-of-
way be addressed through the PUD process. They have spoke to Don Carroll regarding the alignment of
WCR 7.5.
Don Carroll, Public Works, explained that he is aware of the PUD in process, and his intent on the issue is
if they would place the 80-foot right-of-way in the proposed area where the realignment would be, this would
give him an idea of whether the realignment would go across the center of the lakes or mining operations.
Don stated that some of his concerns before developing the PUD,would be how are they going to accomplish
developing the road and then send their overlay. WCR 7.5 is identified in the MUD as going through this piece
of property, and would like to see the alignment in the plan.
Dana stated that the problem with designating it now, is that it could change through the PUD process, and
they would like to begin mining the beginning of February.
Barb Brunk, representative from Rocky Mtn. Consultants, asked that instead of platting an alignment, could
a note be placed on the plat that anticipated the fact that the right-of-way would be there, and include a
conceptual alignment, or that the alignment would be determined through the PUD. Since the plat is going
to be recorded, the concem is that it will be set in stone come time for the PUD process that would determine
the alignment.
Marie Koolstra asked if this would be an issue between Andesite and Public Works. Lee Morrison explained
that the conceptual idea that there will be a tie-in through the operation is a good idea, but is not clear on the
timing of how the PUD would be reviewed and approved. Lee asked if the PUD is on the same parcel. Barb
Brunk explained that it was, and they have gone through the Sketch Plan, and are waiting to submit the
Change of Zone around February or March, and in order to develop the land, the mining is going to have to
be mined and reclaimed before the PUD, this is why they are doing the mining before the development. Lee
stated it would be more appropriate to put this in the PUD process because of the fact that when the mining
is complete, the Special Use Permit will go away. As long as Don Carroll is comfortable with changing the
language that there will be a road without defining the alignment, or putting physically on the plat.
Don Carroll stated that he would prefer to see the alignment on the reclaimed parcel or plat, but if legal staff
was comfortable, then he would go along with it.
•
Arlan asked if the County currently has the right-of-way to WCR 7.5. Don stated they do not, and that he has
asked for dedication.
Mike Miller asked Don if his concern was after the area is mined, that the area designated as a roadway will
not be appropriate to build on. Don stated his concern is that all he is seeing are lakes, and that fill material
will have to be brought in to get it to a state to build an adequate road. Mike stated he agreed, and what
guarantee will they have that a road will have to be built around an existing mined area.
C/17002?
SUMMARY OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
January 5, 1999
Page 3
Barb Brunk stated that the Rademacher's have leased this property with Andesite with the intention to
develop, so they will not let anything happen on mining that would preclude the development of the property.
As they go through the PUD process, responsibility for building the two lanes of the road is going to go onto
the land owner, so it is in their best interest to make sure that when the property is reclaimed, there is a good
base underneath for the road.
Mike Miller asked if the contractor for Rademacher's have with Andesite address the issue. Barb explained
that it contiplates reclamation of the property consistent with future development.
Dana asked that Development Standard#1, add the wording of asphalt along with batch plant. Eric said this
would be acceptable.
Fred Walker asked about the Division of Wildlife, and there request for a survey of the preble mouse. Dana
stated that this has been done, with no findings of the mouse.
Bryant Gimlin asked how long mining process will be. Dana stated four to six years.
Mike Miller asked about the burrowing owl. Dana stated none have been sited in the area, and it was
recommended that there be no disturbance from April 1 to August 31, as this is when the owls are present.
The Chair asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak for or against this application. No
one wished to speak.
The Chair asked if the applicant was in agreement with the Conditions of Approval and Development
Standards. Dana Brand stated they were in agreement.
Arlan Marrs moved to delete Condition of Approval#4A#2 and#6, and add Condition of Approval#4H to state
the following: There will be an 80'right-of-way across the proposed mining property for the extension of WCR
7.5, the location of which shall be determined through the PUD process. Stephan Mokray seconded the
motion.
The Chair asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Marie
Koolstra, yes; Arlan Marrs, yes; Cristie Nicklas, yes; Stephan Mokray,yes; Michael Miller,yes; Bryant Gimlin,
yes; Jack Epple, yes; Fred Walker, yes. Motion carried unanimously.
Arlan Marrs moved to remove the second sentence in Condition of Approval#1, along with the deletion of
#1#1, and add Condition of Approval#5 to state the following: No jurisdictional wetlands shall be disturbed
prior to obtaining appropriate permits. Mike Miller seconded the motion.
The Chair asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Marie
Koolstra, yes; Man Marrs, yes; Cristie Nicklas,yes; Stephan Mokray, yes; Michael Miller, yes; Bryant Gimlin,
yes; Jack Epple, yes; Fred Walker, yes. Motion carried unanimously.
Cristie Nicklas moved that Case USR-1206, be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners along with
the Conditions of Approval and Development Standards, with the word asphalt be added to #1, with the
Planning Commissions recommendation of approval. Mike Miller seconded the motion.
The Chair asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Marie
Koolstra, yes; Man Marrs, yes; Cristie Nicklas,yes; Stephan Mokray, yes; Michael Miller, yes; Bryant Gimlin,
yes; Jack Epple, yes; Fred Walker, yes. Motion carried unanimously.
9906?5--
SUMMARY OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
January 5, 1999
Page 4
CASE NUMBER: USR-1207
APPLICANT: Michael Greckel
PLANNER: Eric Jerman
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 27, Enchanted Hills Subdivision; located in the SW4 of Section 8, T2N,
R67W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado.
REQUEST: Site Specific Development Plan and Use by Special Review Permit for Outdoor Storage of
RV's, Campers, Boats and Trailers.
LOCATION: North of and adjacent to WCR 22 and east of and adjacent to WCR 15.
Eric Jerman, Department of Planning Services, asked that Case USR-1207, be continued to the February 2,
1999, hearing for the following reason:
On December 30, 1998, Weld County Department of Planning Services received a fax from the attorney of
the applicant for USR-1207 requesting a continuance to pursue legal discussions with the Weld County
attorney's office. The applicant requests a continuance of this case until Tuesday, February 2, 1999.
Stephan Mokray moved that Case USR-1207, be continued to the February 2, 1999, hearing. Arlan Marrs
seconded the motion.
The Chair asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Marie
Koolstra, yes; Arlan Mans,yes; Cristie Nicklas, yes; Stephan Mokray, yes; Michael Miller, yes; Bryant Gimlin,
yes; Jack Epple, yes; Fred Walker, yes. Motion carried unanimously.
CASE NUMBER: Z-519
APPLICANT: Terry and Janice Wiedeman/David and Kayleen Hunt
PLANNER: Julie A. Chester
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot B of RE-2112; being part of the S2 of Section 14, T4N, R66W of the 6th
P.M., Weld County, Colorado.
REQUEST: Planned Unit Development Change of Zone for 5 Residential Lots and 1 Commercial Lot with
a 78.2 acre Agricultural Outlot.
LOCATION: Located Northwest of and adjacent to U.S. Hwy 85 and east of WCR 33.
Julie Chester, Department of Planning Services, asked that Case Z-519, be continued to the January 19,
1999, hearing, to give the applicants more time to address specific issues regarding the application must be
addressed prior to a Planning Commission hearing. A meeting has been set up for the week of January 4,
1999, with the applicant to address these issues.
Stephan Mokray moved that Case Z-519, be continued to the January 19, 1999, hearing. Cristie Nicklas
seconded the motion.
The Chair asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Marie
Koolstra,yes; Arlan Marrs,yes; Cristie Nicklas,yes; Stephan Mokray, yes; Michael Miller, yes; Bryant Gimlin,
yes; Jack Epple, yes; Fred Walker, yes. Motion carried unanimously.
99000?-5—
SUMMARY OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
January 5, 1999
Page 5
CASE NUMBER: AmUSR-1191
APPLICANT: Robert Felte
PLANNER: Julie A. Chester
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot A of RE-902; being part of the SW4 of Section 10, UN, R66W of the 6th
P.M., Weld County, Colorado.
REQUEST: Amendment to USR-1191 for a Site Specific Development Plan and Use by Special Review
Permit for an Agricultural Service Establishment to manufacture and assemble agricultural
weedburners and crop sprayers and similarly manufactured parts to store, repair and sell
farm machinery,and to sell agricultural products including, but not limited to the sale of seeds
and the business of seed production, processing, storage, mixing and blending of seed.
LOCATION: North of and adjacent to Hwy 14 and west of WCR 33.
Julie Chester, Department of Planning, presented Case AmUSR-1191. Preliminary comments were entered
as final. Julie explained that USR-1191 was previously approved by Planning Commission on August 18,
1998, the Board of County Commissioners on September 30, 1998, and the plat was recorded on November
9, 1998. It was determined that the changes Mr:Felte wanted to make to the original permit, after purchasing
the property, were substantial enough to do an amendment. The Department of Planning Services is
recommending approval of the application,along with the Conditions of Approval and Development Standards.
Julie then read the recommendation into the record.
Mike Miller asked about the previous permit, USR-1191, and weren't they sharing a water tap with another
property. Julie said they were, and will still be using the same tap.
Fred Walker asked about noise level from the original permit,and the request to change tlpe decibel level from
residential to light industrial. Fred was again concemed that when work is done outside, residential is not
enough, and they are going to be in violation. Julie stated they can change to light industrial and send it to
the Commissioners. Sheble McConnellogue, Health Department, stated she would be in agreement with the
change, as they were agreeable on USR-1191.
Robert Felte, applicant, stated he would like to move the decibel level to light industrial. Julie then pointed out
that looking back at the resolution from USR-1191, the change had been made to 70 decibels, and they can
make the changes again to this application.
Arlan Marrs asked Mr. Felte to give some background on the seed business, and asked if he would be
cleaning the seed. Mr. Felte stated they will not be cleaning seed, and it comes already sacked.
The Chair asked Mr. Felte if he was in agreement with the Conditions of Approval and Development
Standards. Mr. Felte stated he was in agreement.
Cristie Nicklas asked Mr. Felte about splitting a new separate water tap with another property owner. Mr.
Felte stated that this was correct and that the tap was already in.
The Chair asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak for or against this application. No
one wished to speak.
Cristie Nicklas moved to change Development Standard#8, to state light industrial. Mike Miller seconded the
motion.
0Ov7 5
SUMMARY OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
January 5, 1999
Page 6
The Chair asked the secretary tq poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Marie
Koolstra, yes; Arlan Marrs,yes; Cristie Nicklas,yes;Stephan Mokray, yes; Michael Miller, yes; Bryant Gimlin,
yes; Jack Epple, yes; Fred Walker, yes. Motion carried unanimously.
Fred Walker moved that Case AmUSR-1191, be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners along with
the Conditions of Approval and Development Standards with the Planning Commissions recommendation of
approval. Cristie Nicklas seconded the motion.
The Chair asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Marie
Koolstra, yes; Arlan Marrs,yes; Cristie Nicklas, yes;Stephan Mokray, yes; Michael Miller, yes; Bryant Gimlin,
yes; Jack Epple, yes; Fred Walker, yes. Motion carried unanimously.
CASE NUMBER: USR-1208
APPLICANT: Henry Karre
PLANNER: Sheri Lockman
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Union Colony Subdivision, Lots 1 and 2, located in the NW4 SE4 and Lots
1,2,3 and 4, located in the NE4 SE4, being part of Section 15, T5N, R65W
of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado.
REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and Use by Special Review Permit for a Public
Recreational Facility (Paint Ball Field).
LOCATION: West of and adjacent to 18th Street and north of State Hwy 34.
Sheri Lockman, Department of Planning Services, presented Case USR-1208. Preliminary comments were
entered as final. The Department of Planning is recommending approval of the application, along with the
Conditions of Approval and Development Standards. Sheri then read the recommendation into the record.
Mike Miller asked where the access was. Sheri stated that it was located on the 34 business, and that CDOT
is just asking that an application sheet be filled out, and they did not have a problem with the access.
Anthony Navarro, applicant, asked about the USDA soil map indicating that a small portion is irrigated, and
that this was not correct. Mr. Navarro then explained the sport of paint ball, and stated it began about 15
years ago. He than entered some photos of the sport into evidence. He stated that they are required to have
insurance that requires safety provisions for all of the players. Mr. Navarro than asked if he could change the
number of players from 40 to 100-150 people, as the number can change depending on the event.
Discussion of concems from the Board, Health Department, and Public Works, as well as staff on the change
from 40 players to 100-150 players were as follows:
' The original permit was for the 40 players,which referrals went out on and were responded to at this
number, and the unfairness to surrounding property owners.
The increase is almost three times, as where a smaller number would not be substantial.
` The number of people on the site and the number of porta-potties available.
' Adequate parking for 100 people
• Location and safety of access
' The lack of information the map of the area provided
The Chair asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak for or against this application.
9gooa�
SUMMARY OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
January 5, 1999
Page 7
Henry Karre, property owner,wanted to clarify they had no intention of operating illegally. Mr. Karre was under
the impression that there was a permit in process before Mr. Navarro bought the business. Mr. Karre did state
that as soon as Mr. Navarro found'he was in violation, he speedily began the USR process. No irrigated land
will be effected. He also talked about The City of Greeley referral regarding becoming more urbanized, and
the anticipated development of commercial and residential. With the area being in the flood plain, he does
not see a lot of development or impact. Fred Walker wanted Mr. Karre to be aware that fill dirt can be brought
in for development to occur. Fred than asked about the request from the City of Greeley on the 10-year limit
on the permit, on how does he feel about the request. Mr. Karre stated he did not have a real problem with
it, and a 10-year review would settle it one way or another without any hassle in court.
The Chair asked Mr. Navarro about Development Standard #8 and#10, and the changes he would like to
make, from 40 people to 100-150 people. Marie stated that this is not going to be fair to referral agencies or
surrounding property owners. Lee Morrison suggested either getting a special permit through the Board of
County Commissioners when he has a large event, or update the referrals with the change in numbers and
resend them, and continue this case.
Mr. Navarro agreed to continue the case, and asked to be able to operate at the end of January. Lee stated
according to Sharyn Frazer,Zoning Compliance Officer, it would be unlikely that any violation would be issued,
since he is currently under violation.
Cristie Nicklas moved that Case USR-1208, be continued to the February 2, 1999, hearing. Mike Miller
seconded the motion.
The Chair asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Marie
Koolstra,yes; Arlan Marrs, yes; Cristie Nicklas, yes; Stephan Mokray, yes; Michael Miller, yes; Bryant Gimlin,
yes; Jack Epple, yes; Fred Walker, yes. Motion carried unanimously.
'
CASE NUMBER: USR-1210
APPLICANT: Cattleman's Choice Loomix, LLC
PLANNER: Ben Patton
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot A of RE-307; being part of the NE4 of Section 7, T4N, R67W of the 6th
P.M., Weld County, Colorado.
REQUEST: Site Specific Development Plan and Use by Special Review Permit for an Agri-business
office, Storage, and Research Facility.
LOCATION: South of and adjacent to State Hwy 60;west of and adjacent to WCR 15.
Ben Patton, Department of Planning, presented Case USR-1210. Preliminary comments were entered as
final. The Department of Planning is recommending approval of the application, along with Conditions of
Approval and Development Standards. Ben then read the recommendation into the record.
Ken Munsch, applicant, gave some background information on the company, explaining that it has been
family owned since the 1950's. They take anything that is a liquid bi-product, and mix them with natural bi-
products to provide protein and vitamin/mineral supplements for cattle. The company does not own any plants
that manufacture the products. They have a manufacturing agreement with a company located in Johnstown,
and no manufacturing will be done at the office site. They will not be adding any structures to the property,
and will be doing some remodeling such as heating, air condition, and wiring. They want to maintain the
integrity, beauty, and historical value of the property. The company does not feed cattle, so will have no
livestock, but may have one to two test animals on the site at times.
gg Boa
SUMMARY OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
January 5, 1999
Page 8
Arlan Marrs asked Mr. Munsch if he had any plans to add any buildings, feeding large numbers of animals,
and asked about truck traffic and employees. Mr. Munsch stated they will not be adding any new structures,
and will only have a few animals i/any on the site to test feeding. As far as truck traffic coming in and out, all
the production and manufacturing will still be at the Johnstown plant down town, and they occasionally get a
product in that UPS will deliver, which may only be one to two per month, some months less than that. There
are five employees in the office currently, with at times seven to eight max.
Mike Miller asked if there was any production on the site, no mixing or blending, odors and noise. Mr. Munsch
stated absolutely not.
The Chair asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak for or against this application.
The surrounding property owner's, Chet Hays, Jerry Hildreth, Pat Wachholtz, Artis Rohn, Sam Swoape, and
Mark Spaur, had the following concerns:
• Opposed to the increase in traffic, and the safety concerns for children
• Opposed to possible number of cattle on the property
` The effects it may have on any long range planning
` Road repairs with the increase of traffic
A petition signed by 41 people, was entered into evidence, opposed to cattle and increase of traffic, noise and
pollution.
Ken Munsch, addressed the concerns. He stated they have never feed cattle, and do not want to feed cattle.
They are not saying they will never have a cow, because they may have two to four or one to two at times to
test feed, in an extended period of 90 days. Mr. Munsch did point out that the property isrzoned for 24 cows,
and with Loomix, they have no intention of placing that amount on the property. There will be no noise or
pollution since noting is manufactured on the site. On the truck traffic concern, when a product is delivered,
there are no chemicals delivered or stored, only natural products, that are contained in 2-1/2 gallons drums.
There will only be about one truck per month coming onto the property.
Don Carroll addressed the access concerns. He had made a site inspection on December 7, 1998, and there
is a circle drive with brick pillars at both accesses. The north access was locked, and the south access was
18-20 feet wide, and a UPS truck could easily get in and out, and a semi could negotiate the turn. Don
explained that the County does maintain WCR 15 south of State 60, they have tried to get Johnstown to annex
it so they can upgrade it and widen it, and nothing has happened. They have been successful north of State
60, and Johnstown has taken that over. As far as traffic counts,they have no current counts,the last one was
in 1996, showing 117. Don stated that people from the subdivision are creating most of the traffic.
Stephan Mokray asked Don with the prediction of traffic, did he see any additional problems. Don stated he
did not, and that UPS trucks go through many subdivisions every day. Mr. Munsch stated that they are only
open from 8-5, 5 days week, and not on night or weekends.
Fred Walker asked Mr. Munsch about the property owners concerns with the intensity of the use,with some
assurance of what he is saying is going to happen, will happen. Mr. Munsch explained that there will be no
people coming in the office buying from them, and sales are mainly done over the phone. They want to
maintain the beauty of the property.
The Chair asked Mr. Munsch if he was in agreement with the Conditions of Approval and Development
Standards. Mr. Munsch stated he was in agreement.
9910667
SUMMARY OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
January 5, 1999
Page 9
Ben Patton wanted to possibly adding some Conditions to ease property owners. Ben explained that the 24
cattle is a use by right, but if the applicant is willing to restrict the number of cattle to eight or ten, and limit the
number of trucks, they could be included as Conditions.
Mike Miller stated it would be easy to count cows, but to keep track of trucks, this may be tough to enforce.
Mr. Munsch stated he would not have a problem with limiting the number of cattle, but does not agree with
the truck limit.
•
Arlan Marrs stated although the applicant is willing to limit the number of cattle, it is a right by the County. This
property has been up for sale, and could have been bought by anyone with the maximum number of cattle.
Arlan stated he does not like the idea of subdivisions coming out, and suddenly all of the County rules are not
good enough. This is an agricultural county, and four cows per acre is a use by right, and is not an excessive
number. The surrounding property owners should be thankful that Loomix is willing to maintain the property,
and not putting 24 cattle on the site.
Lee Morrison stated that this is a USR for a commercial operation, and a commercial operation limits the
number of cattle, if any. If Loomix moves out, and someone else takes over the permit, they could either
follow the existing permit, or vacate the permit, and have the full 24 animals. Lee stated there would be no
reason why the number of cattle could not be restricted, being a commercial operation.
The Chair asked if there was a motion from the board to either limit the number of cattle or trucks. There was
no such motion.
Stephan Mokray stated it would be like putting handcuffs on a business telling them they can only have two
trucks come per month.
Stephan Mokray moved that Case USR-1210, be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners along with
the Conditions of Approval and Development Standards with the Planning Commissions recommendation of
approval. Cristie Nicklas seconded the motion.
The Chair asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Marie
Koolstra,yes; Arlan Marrs, yes; Cristie Nicklas,yes; Stephan Mokray,yes; Michael Miller, yes; Bryant Gimlin,
yes; Jack Epple, yes; Fred Walker, yes. Motion carried unanimously.
Meeting adjourned at 4:10 p.m.
Respectfully submi d
(Littoil
Wendi Inloes
Secretary
Hello