HomeMy WebLinkAbout980384.tiff DEC 01 '97 11:10 LONGMONT FOODS P. 1
MYRON GRUNER
9952 SIERRA VISTA RD
LONGMONT, CO. 80504
12/01/97
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES
WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES •
GREELEY, CO. 80631
FAX 970-352-6312
RE: CASE NUMBER USR -1177
WHEN I FIRST SIGNED A PETITION FOR THIS BUILDING I WAS TOLD THAT IT WAS
ONLY GOING TO BE A LARGER GARAGE., DARYL HAFELE SAID HE DID NOT KNOW
WHY WELD COUNTY WAS MAKING SUCH A BIG DEAL ABOUT IT, AND HE COULD
NOT UNDERSTAND WHY A PERMIT WOULD COST $1,500.
i NOW HEAR THAT THIS GARAGE IS GOING TO BE A LARGE BUILDING AND IS
GOING TO BE USED FOR A TREE BUSINESS.
V VHEN I MOVED INTO THIS AREA IN THE EARLIER 70'S IT WAS FOR THE OPEN
SPACE AND TO HAVE A HOME FREE OF NOISE, TRAFFIC, BUSINESS.
I HAVE SEEN THE AREA GROW, AND HAVE BEEN TOLD BY THE MAYOR FROM
FIRESTONE THAT YOU CAN NOT STOP IT, LIVE WITH IT OUT GET OUT.
CASAGRANDE ES i A''ES IS THE ONLY PLACID`VHERE I MAY STILL HAVE A VOICE,
AND THE VOICE SAYS, NO-NO-NO. THIS IS NOT WHAT CASAGRADE ESTATES SHOULD
BE, PLEASE DO NOT GIVE PERMISSION FOR THIS PERMIT TO GO THRU.
SINCERELY
MYRON GRUNER
Weld County Planning Dept.
DEC 011997
OIECEIVED
980384
La
'' lX�IT
12/01/97 10:02 TX/RX N0.9338 P.0O1 •
DEC 09 '97 06:35AM LONGMONT FOODS 3034409564 P. 1
MYRON GRUNER
9952 SIERRA VISTA RD
LONGMONT, CO 80504
12/09/97
RE: CASE NUMBER USR -117
SINCE MY FAX OF 12/01/97 I HAVE HAD A MEETING WITH DARYL HAFELE
OVER THE WEEKEND.
HE HAS EXPLAINED WHAT PLANS HE HIS FOR THIS BUILDING AND THE
LOCATION WHERE IT WILL BE. HE SAID THAT IT WILL NOT BE A BUSINESS.,
AND A REVIEW BY ME SHOW S THAT THE BUSINESS WILL BE AT 9915 NAVAJO
COURT.
DARYLE HAFELE ALSO SAID THAT TO THE BEST OF HIS KNOWLEDGE, IF HE
SOLD HIS HOME, A NEW BUYER WOULD HAVE TO USE THE BUILDING FOR THE
SAME NEEDS, AND COULD NOT START A BUSINESS WITHOUT GOING BACK TO
THE WELD COUNTLY PLANNING OFFICE.
REGARDING DOCKET NO 97-83, 1 WILL MEET WITH ROALDN & SHARON BUNN AND
REVIEW WHAT TYPE OF BUSINESS THIS WILL BE AND TRY AND FIND OUT WHAT
THIS MAY DO TO CASAGRADE ESTATES.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR HELP IN THIS MATTER.
SINCERELY
MYRON GRUNER
Weld County Planning Dept.
DEC 0 9y199v97
tI1I
ED
•
EXHIBIT
9803 , 1
12/09/97 05:42 TX/RX N0.9437 P.001
December 18, 1997
Weld County Department of Planning Services Weld County Planning Dept.
1400 N. 17th Avenue
Greeley CO 80631
JAN U 5 1998
Subject: Accessory Building, lot 2,block 2, Casagrande Estates Subdivision
Case number USR-1177 �t�y,
D
To: The Weld County Planning Commission , l EC E I V E
We,residents of Casagrande Estates Subdivision,are in receipt of the notification from Weld County Dept.
of Planning Services regarding the application for a Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review
Permit for the construction of an Accessory Building at the above site. We wish to make known to the
Weld Board of County Commissioners,the Weld County Planning Commission and the Dept. of Planning
Services the following comments on and objections to the request of the applicant:
1. The size and the height of the building is inappropriate. It will dominate the houses on the surrounding
properties which are one story ranch type residences.
2. A metal building of this description is inappropriate and violates neighborhood values. Although not
binding on the County, such a building does not conform to the Subdivision Protective Covenants, article 6
[recorded 10/6/72] as to conformance to the residences in design and construction.
3. Based on these covenants and sensible aesthetic considerations no building should be permitted that is
incongruous to the location in respect to height,bulk, material of construction or design.
4. Such a building, light industrial/commercial in appearance by construction and color, can reduce the
value of surrounding properties.
5. An accessory building of this size is unsuitable on this lot of less than one acre.
6. The alleged, ambiguous proposed use of the building for vehicle storage and a shop, for non commercial
use, could be contained in a much smaller building. The applicant should demonstrate a pressing need for
a structure of this size for personal use.
7. If in the future this property were sold with this type of building on it, there would be a temptation for a
prospective purchaser to consider using the building for commercial purposes illegal in the zoning with
concomitant increase of traffic and other nuisances on a residential street in a rural residential
neighborhood.
8. Approval of such a structure would constitute an unfavorable precedent for buildings in the subdivision.
We request that the Weld County Planning Commissioners take the above comments and objections into
consideration when reviewing the subject application, vote against and recommend denial of said
application to the Board of County Commissioners. Please make this letter part of the public record for the
proceedings.
Very truly yours,
Name Addr
..�,/ ' 2, A, .- . e 70 a 7 L ,cOS4 ei,Iti__ /�0 I aurae„� rCa •
yea/
/, A . .s„,mJL leaf' 4cn0d .
7 � -- In ` 202, -> r0,c_ 1 Cay"'.tc ce 07< koracu
Qm T� 7 7/l.fr e f fZ/9 ti 1T/? g U 1,),,..6m,...7- ea g'asd
(�,�r_.taw qZ/! cjenc. 01.7;4 Rd • LauconOrtrr co . 2 o tf
,�itq zu�� e :7vE2 ..,
PCs: Weld County Planning Commission, Weld Board of County Commissioners • EXHIBIT
980384 I ao
H �-���JG3?'U �,S I .7,c,st,�-i2, v:�t7't f2c;L
C it +/VC, 748 /t/i r G, k-c " eyp a y z7
O1.� rft* ?J/a *.L;.-,r.((k c±, Lam.. -� �K{ C � SOSc Li
s(� p-40 �w n toll o5n- a A0,,,,„0-s Co fasoy
JLAN-1.29k VIII Cc:nL-‘_ L, L'� ( „c H Lt 1 Cc , cc `(
,.�� yy� ?;atlti 70 /0/79,9 L/sv r 4 DA/c,•)-7v4/ i Co Po 5u
Hello