Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout990223.tiff BEFORE THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Moved by Stephan Mokray that the following resolution be introduced for passage by the Weld County Planning Commission. Be it resolved by the Weld County Planning Commission that the application for: CASE NUMBER: USR-1204 tea' C) APPLICANT: David Miller = _ '_ . Pl ADDRESS: 30867 Rocky Road o v Greeley, CO 80631 ; ' —co PLANNER: Scott Ballstadt _ ;"1 NJ REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review Permit for an Accessory Structure with Gross Floor Area larger than 1,500 square feet (2,400 square feet) in Orr Minor Subdivision in the A(Agricultural) Zone District LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 3, Orr Minor Subdivision, being part of Section 32, T6N, R66W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado P.M. LOCATION: Approximately 500' south of Weld County Road 64 and approximately 3/4 mile east of Weld County Road 27 be recommended favorably to the Board of County Commissioners for the following reasons: 1. The submitted materials are in compliance with the application requirements of Section 24.7 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, as amended. 2. It is the opinion of the Planning Commission that the applicant has shown compliance with Section 24.3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, as amended, as follows: a. Section 24.3.1.1 --This proposal is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan's Urban Growth Boundary Goal and Policy 2. This policy states that land use proposals in urban growth boundary areas shall be encouraged if they adhere to the intent of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan and the referral responses received. The proposal is located within the City of Greeley's Urban Growth Boundary and a referral response received from the City November 12, 1998 indicated that the proposal is consistent with the City's comprehensive plan. b. Section 24.3.1.2 -- This proposal is consistent with the intent of the A (Agricultural) zone district. Section 31.4.16 provides for Accessory Buildings with gross floor area larger than 1,500 square feet as a Use by Special Review in the A zone district. c. Section 24.3.1.3--The proposed uses will be compatible with existing surrounding land uses. The surrounding land uses include residential acreages within and around Orr Minor Subdivision, as well as agricultural uses to the north, east and west and the Poudre River to the south. The applicant has indicated that the use of the structure is personal storage, as no commercial or industrial uses are taking place on site and Mr. Miller has no employees. EXHIBIT 990223 ugQ #TaA RESOLUTION, USR-1204 David Miller Page 2 d. Section 24.3.1.4 -- The proposed uses will be compatible with future development of the surrounding area as permitted by the A (Agricultural) zone districts and with the future development as projected by the Comprehensive Plan or Master Plan of affected municipalities. As stated above, the City of Greeley has indicated that the proposal is consistent with the City's comprehensive plan. The City did propose two conditions of approval which are addressed in the attached conditions of approval. e. Section 24.3.1.5 -- The proposal is located within the City of Greeley's Urban Growth Boundary area. Also, the extreme southern portion of the property is located within the floodplain according to FIRM panel #080266 0608, however, the structure has been constructed on the northern portion of the property which is not in the floodplain. Additionally, staff has visited the site and verified that the structure has been constructed on the northern portion of the property. The property is not located within any other Overlay District Areas identified by maps officially adopted by Weld County. f. Section 24.3.1.6 --The applicant has demonstrated a diligent effort to conserve productive agricultural land. This parcel is 3.7 acres in size and is located within a platted subdivision, Orr Minor Subdivision. No prime farm ground will be taken out of production. g. Section 24.3.1.7 --The Design Standards (Section 24.5 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, as amended), Operation Standards (Section 24.6 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, as amended), Conditions of Approval, and Development Standards ensure that there are adequate provisions for the protection of health, safety, and welfare of the inhabitants of the neighborhood and county. As stated above, the applicant has a signed petition of surrounding property owners. This recommendation is based, in part, upon a review of the application materials submitted by the applicant, other relevant information regarding the request, and responses from referral entities. The Planning Commission's recommendation for approval is conditional upon the following: 1. The attached Development Standards for the Special Review Permit shall be adopted and placed on the Special Review Plat prior to recording the plat. The completed plat shall be delivered to the Department of Planning Services and be ready for recording in the Weld County Clerk and Recorder's Office within 30 days of approval by the Board of County Commissioners. (Planning) 2. Prior to recording the plat: A. All accesses shall be clearly delineated on the plat. (Planning) B. The plat shall be amended to adhere to the Special Review Permit Plan Map requirements stated in Section 24.7.4 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, as amended. (Planning) C. The applicant shall submit a new Affidavit of Interest Owners Minerals and Subsurface Estate and list of names of such owners. (Planning) 3. The Special Review activity shall not occur nor shall any building or electrical permits be issued on the property until the Special Review plat is ready to be recorded in the office of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. (Planning) 390223 RESOLUTION, USR-1204 David Miller Page 3 Motion seconded by Arlan Marrs. VOTE: For Passage Against Passage Cristie Nicklas Arlan Marrs Fred Walker Stephan Mokray Marie Koolstra Jack Epple Bruce Fitzgerald Michael Miller The Chairman declared the resolution passed and ordered that a certified copy be forwarded with the file of this case to the Board of County Commissioner for further proceedings. CERTIFICATION OF COPY I, Wendi Inloes, Recording Secretary for the Weld County Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing resolution, is a true copy of the resolution of the Planning Commission of Weld County, Colorado, adopted on December 1, 1998. Datedd the 1st of D em er, 1998. Wait Wendi Inloes Secretary 990223 SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS USR-1204 Miller 1. The Site Specific Development Plan and Special Use Permit is for an Accessory Structure with Gross Floor Area larger than 1,500 square feet (2,400 square feet) in Orr Minor Subdivision in the A (Agricultural) zone district, as indicated in the application materials on file in the Department of Planning Services and subject to the Development Standards stated hereon. (Planning) 2. Approval of this plan may create a vested property right pursuant to Section 90 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, as amended. (Planning) 3. All liquid and solid wastes shall be stored and removed for final disposal in a manner that protects against surface and groundwater contamination. (Health Dept.) 4. No permanent disposal of wastes shall be permitted at this site. (Health Dept.) 5. Waste materials shall be handled, stored, and disposed in a manner that controls fugitive dust, blowing debris, and other potential nuisance conditions. (Health Dept.) 6. The maximum permissible noise level shall not exceed the residential limit of 55 db(A), as measured according to 25-12-102, Colorado Revised Statutes. (Health Dept.) 7. The facility shall utilize the existing public water supply (City of Greeley). (Health Dept.) 8. There shall be no employees at this site as stated in the application materials. (Health Dept.) 9. All required inspections shall be conducted upon issuance of building permit and all conditions of the building permit shall be addressed to the Weld County Building Inspection Department's satisfaction. (Building Inspection) 10. Should water service be proposed to the accessory structure a separate water tap shall be required. (City of Greeley) 11. The Accessory Building permitted by Special Review shall not be used on any basis as a dwelling or as overnight or temporary housing for any person. (Planning) 12. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Design Standards of Section 24.5 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, as amended. (Planning) 13. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Operation Standards of Section 24.6 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, as amended. (Planning) 14. Personnel from the Weld County Health Department and Weld County Department of Planning Services shall be granted access onto the property at any reasonable time in order to ensure the activities carried out on the property comply with the Development Standards stated hereon and all applicable Weld County regulations. (Planning) 4 990223 15. The Special Review area shall be limited to the plans shown hereon and governed by the foregoing standards and all applicable Weld County regulations. Substantial changes from the plans or Development Standards as shown or stated shall require the approval of an amendment of the Permit by the Weld County Planning Commission before such changes from the plans or Development Standards are permitted. Any other changes shall be filed in the office of the Department of Planning Services. (Planning) 16. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with all of the foregoing Development Standards. Noncompliance with any of the foregoing Development Standards may be reason for revocation of the Permit by the Weld County Planning Commission. (Planning) 5 990223 SUMMARY OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION December 1, 1998 Page 4 1. CASE NUMBER' USR-1204' APPLICANT:Davitf Wier i PLANNER: Scott Ballstadt LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 3 of Orr Minor Subdivision; being part of Section 32, T6N, R66W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. REQUEST: Site Specific Development Plan and Use by Special Review Permit for an accessory structure larger than 1,500 sq. Ft. (2,400 sq. Ft.) In Orr Subdivision. LOCATION: Approximately 500'south of Weld County Road 64 and approximately 3/4 mile east of Weld County Road 27. Scott Ballstadt, Department of Planning Services, presented case USR-1204. New comments were handed out to replace preliminary comments. The Department of Planning is recommending approval of the application along with the Conditions of Approval and Development Standards. Scoff than read the recommendation into the record. Bruce Fitzgerald asked Scott at what stage was of completion was the building. Scott stated that is was complete. Marie Koolstra asked where leach field is located. David Miller, applicant, stated it was about 60-feet to east of the building. Mr. Miller also added that he agreed with Fred Walker and Michael Miller on the previous case, and feels that a USR for the building is a bit ridiculous. Arlan Marrs asked Mr. Miller if he was ok with the condition that he was not to have any employees. Mr. Miller stated he did not have a problem with this condition. Mike Miller asked Mr. Miller who the contractor was, and why he built the building without a permit. Mr. Miller explained that they did have a building permit that was issued to him and setbacks were inspected, and it was after this that he was informed that he needed a USR. Mike asked Scott to explain how Mr. Miller got the building permit, and than told after the building was started, that they needed the USR. Scott explained that Planning staff received the information after the issuance of the building permit, and there is some confusion as to the circumstances surrounding when the building permit was issued, and was notified after the permit had been issued. Mike asked at what point in the application process would this normally be caught. Scott explained that he would happen at the building permit stage, when general inquiries on larger structures are questioned. Mike than added that basically a building permit was issued allowing Mr. Miller to get started, and then had him come in and pay an additional$1,100 to get the USR. Scott stated this was correct. Mike stated he did not find this fair, and if any remedies could be done at this point, and that it is unfair to let Mr. Miller get into building the building and tack on USR fee. Scott explained that the Board of County Commissioners have agreed upon refunding the USR application fee to the applicant. Mr. Miller stated it has cost$700 to prepare. The Chair asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak for or against this application. No one wished to speak. The Chair asked Mr. Miller is he was in agreement with the Conditions of Approval and Development Standards. Mr. Miller stated he was in agreement. (.4 EXHIBIT 990223 I C USR /ao'/ SUMMARY OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION December 1, 1998 Page 5 Fred Walker asked if the Board of County Commissioners have already been involved, then why is the Planning Commission getting involved, and that it seems they are also wasting their time if something has already been decided. Fred said he thought the application should not have even been on the agenda. Lee explained that Scott had not indicated that the Commissioners had made a decision on the merits of the application, but just dealt with the fee. Fred asked Lee that wasn't it implied that if Mr. Miller was refunded his money, that they had made a decision. Lee stated he did not believe so. Stephan Mokray moved that Case USR-1204, be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners along with the Conditions of Approval and Development Standards with the Planning Commissions recommendation of approval. Arlan Marrs seconded the motion. The Chair asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Marie Koolstra, yes; Arlan Marrs, yes; Cristie Nicklas, yes; Stephan Mokray, yes; Michael Miller, yes; Bruce Fitzgerald, yes; Jack Epple, yes; Fred Walker, yes. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 2:20 p.m. Respectfully submi ed Wendi Inloes Secretary J9022el Hello