Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout960401 DOYLE, OTIS, FREY & HELLERICH, LLC i LLD CO l ;Ty ATTORNEYS AT LAW West Greeley Law Center DENVER METRO RichardHenryC. FreyDoyle - - - 1812 56TH AVENUE (970) 659-7576 hry sFrey GREELEY, COLORADO 80634 FAX Thomas Otis Hellerich �?07, 'r 4 _ kP� (�1: 37 Fred L. Otis r" (970) 330-6700 (970) 330-2969 CLER:( Anthony V. Mello TO TILE DC !.79 File No. 4282 March 1, 1996 Weld County Commissioners P.O. Box 758 Greeley, CO 80632 RE: Laidlaw Waste Systems (Colorado), Inc. Dear Sir/Madam: I am writing to you on behalf of Laidlaw Waste Systems (Colorado), Inc. ("Laidlaw"). As you know, Laidlaw may be asking for some modifications to Use By Special Review Permit No. 972 ("U.S.R.") relating to the Laidlaw South Landfill near Erie, Colorado. The Department of Planning Services Staff thus far has taken the position that the modifications are "major changes" as that term is defined in the Weld County Zoning Ordinance (the "Zoning Code"), Section apply 24.9. Laidlaw would therefore request that you consider two matters that will not only a 1 to Laidlaw, but other U.S.R. permit holders seeking amendments in the future as well. The items for your consideration are as follows: 1. A reduced application fee for an amendment to a U.S.R. for use as a landfill. 2. Amendments to Weld County Zoning Ordinance, Section 24.9 so that the application requirements are sized to the type of requested changes. With regard to the application fee, such fees are set pursuant to the Zoning Code, Section 29.1. The application fee for a landfill permit is $17,114 as set by the Weld County Commissioners on January 1, 1995. It is my understanding that the application fee for landfill permits was set to take into account the amount of staff time necessary to process a complete startup landfill operation. It is my further understanding that when the landfill application fee was initially established, the number of hours for the full application was studied carefully by the Commissioners so as to set a fee in an appropriate amount. Such fees for a startup landfill do not apply to an amendment such as that which is about to be submitted by Laidlaw. Yes, your Staff has determined that the amendments are "major changes" to the existing U.S.R. and Laidlaw believes that the principal reason for that determination is so that there can be a public hearing on the amendments. However, the Staff time necessary to process those amendments n �' 960401� CMan�cr.� 40SIoLPIcW Pc 0.„) PLOWS Bill Landwehr January 10, 1996 Page 2 Weld County Commissioners March 1, 1995 Page Two will come no where near the time that is necessary to process a startup application. Laidlaw believes that an application fee similar to that which is required for a non-landfill U.S.R. would be more appropriate. We respectfully request that you consider permitting Laidlaw to pay an application fee other than the full startup application fee of $17,114. With regard to amendments to Section 24.9 of the Zoning Code, Laidlaw respectfully points out that once the Staff has determined that a proposed amendment is a "major change", the Zoning Code in essence requires that the applicant file an application as if no permit exists, i.e. start over. Laidlaw would suggest that the Zoning Code be amended to permit the application materials to be matched with the change that is being requested. Most of the application materials will be unnecessary and inappropriate. The Zoning Code should require materials related to the amendment only, the details of which could be worked out by the Planning Services Staff. The present Zoning Code language at Section 24.9 simply requires too much paperwork that is unnecessary and very expensive to produce. It is my understanding that on occasion, the Staff tells applicants that certain portions of the materials are unnecessary in spite of the language of Section 24.9 requiring complete application materials. The language of Section 24.9 should be changed to expressly permit a limited application covering only the modification so that a challenge could not later be made that the application materials were insufficient. We look forward to hearing from you regarding these two matters at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, Fred L. Otis Attorney at Law FLO:mkh cc: Kevin Carel Scott Wender Rick Hoffman Hello