Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout972620.tiffRESOLUTION RE: CONSENT TO THE ENFORCEMENT BY THE WINDSOR -SEVERANCE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT OF THE 1994 UNIFORM FIRE CODE AND STANDARDS, WITH AMENDMENTS, WITHIN THE DISTRICT'S UNINCORPORATED PORTIONS OF WELD COUNTY WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, Section 32-1-1002(1)(d), C.R.S., provides that a fire code promulgated by a fire district may be enforced in the unincorporated portions of a county only with the consent of the Board of County Commissioners of such county, and WHEREAS, the Windsor -Severance Fire Protection District ("the District") has presented a resolution adopting and promising to enforce the 1994 Edition of the Uniform Fire Code and Standards, with certain amendments included in said resolution, within the District's unincorporated portions of Weld County, and WHEREAS, after review, the Board deems it advisable to consent to the enforcement by the District of the 1994 Edition of the Uniform Fire Code and Standards, with certain amendments included in said resolution of the Windsor -Severance Fire Protection District, within the District's unincorporated portions of Weld County. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that it hereby consents to the enforcement by the Windsor -Severance Fire Protection District of the 1994 Edition of the Uniform Fire Code and Standards, with certain amendments as included in the attached resolution of the Windsor -Severance Fire Protection District, within the District's unincorporated portions of Weld County. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 22nd day of December, A.D., 1997. CC ; 0H; &&5FPD BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD OUNTY, CO RADIO c George E. Baxter, Chairman J„ �AUhll _ }l /i 7Cfl 4 arbara J. Kirkme,yer o W.H. ebs er 972620 SD0002 1 2 3 FIRE CODE WINDSOR - SEVERANCE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 4 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE UNIFORM FIE CODE, UNIFORM FIRE CODE 5 STANDARDS PRESCRIBING REGULATIONS GOVERNING CONDITIONS 6 HAZARDOUS TO LIFE AND PROPERTY FROM FIRE OR EXPLOSION, AND 7 PROVIDING FOR [HN. ISSUANCE OF PERMITS FOR HAZARDOUS USES OR 8 OPERATION. 9 10 WHEREAS, The Board of Directors of the Windsor - Severance Fire Protection District deems 11 it necessary to adopt the following code for the purpose of establishing rules of conduct and 12 standards for the protection life, health, property, security, and welfare of the inhabitants of the 13 District; and 14 15 WHEREAS, The Board of Directors has considered the effect of the fire code enforcement 16 within the boundaries of the District and has determined that enforcement of the proposed codes 17 would not cause undue hardship or suppression of economic growth within the District; and 18 19 WHEREAS, The Board of Directors has studied the necessity for realistic and reasonable level of 20 fire protection to be provided by a rural fire protection district; and 21 22 WHEREAS, The Board of Directors will pursue adoption by municipalities within the limits of 23 the District to adopt the same codes for the purpose of ensuring equitable protection of all of the 24 inhabitants of the District; 25 26 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 27 28 SECTION I: Adoption of 1994 Uniform Fire Code and Uniform Fire Code Standards. 29 30 There is hereby adopted by the Windsor - Severance Fire Protection District for the purpose of 31 prescribing regulations governing conditions hazardous to life and property from fire, hazardous 32 materials, or explosion, that certain Codes and Standards known as the Uniform Fire Code, 33 including Appendix Chapters and the Uniform Fire Code Standards. published by the International 34 Fire Code Institute' and the International Conference of Building Officials, being particularly the 35 1994 editions thereof and the whole thereof, save and except such portions as are hereinafter 36 deleted. modified, or amended by the Resolution of which said Code and Standards are now filed 37 in the offices of the Windsor - Severance Fire Protection District, and the same are hereby 38 adopted and incorporated as fully as if set out at length herein. The date on which this Resolution 39 shall take effect within the incorporated municipalities within this District shall be the date of 40 approval by the governing board of said municipality and the date on which it shall take effect 41 within the unincorporated portions of Weld/Larimer Counties shall be on the date of approval by 42 the Boards of County Commissioners in and for the Counties of Weld/Larimer. State of 43 Colorado. This Code shall be in effect within the territorial limits of the Windsor - Severance Fire 44 Protection District. 45 PAGE 1 972620 46 SECTION II: Establishment and Duties of Fire Prevention 47 48 Organizational structure and duties of the fire prevention bureau or department, if any, shall be as 49 provided by the District's bylaws. .50 51 SECTION III: Definitions. 52 53 Wherever the word "District" is used, it shall mean the Windsor - Severance Fire Protection 54 District. 55 56 Wherever the word "jurisdiction" is used in the adopted Code and Standards, it is meant to be 57 inclusive of the boundaries of the Windsor - Severance Fire Protection District as they now or 58 may hereafter exist. 59 60 Where the term "Chief' or "Chief of the Bureau of Fire Prevention" is used, it shall be held to 61 mean the Chief or Fire Marshal of the Windsor - Severance Fire Protection District, or a 62 designated member of the District. 63 64 Where the term "Bureau of Fire Prevention" is used, it shall be held to mean either the entire 65 department or those employees (paid or volunteers) designated by the Chief to carry out 66 enforcement duties relating to the prevention of fires and the suppression of arson. 67 68 Where the term "Board" is used, it shall be held to mean the Board of Directors of the Windsor - 69 Severance Fire Protection District. 70 71 Wherever the term "Uniform Building Code" is used, it shall be held to mean the Uniform 72 Building Code as adopted. amended and incorporated into the Weld/Larimer County Building 73 Code, Town of Windsor Building Code or the Town of Severance Building Code. 74 75 SECTION IV: Establishment of Limits in Which Storage of Liquefied Petroleum Gases is to be 76 Restricted. 77 78 The limits referred to in Article 82. Section 8204.2 of the Uniform Fire Code, in which the 79 storage of liquefied petroleum gas is restricted are hereby amended as follows: "or as addressed 80 by any ordinance or zoning regulation adopted by Weld/Larimer Counties, or municipalities. This 81 section shall not be interpreted so as not to be in conflict with the provisions of § 8-20-101 et seq. 8? and § 34-64-101 et seq., C.R.S." 83 84 SECTION V. Amendments Made in and to the Uniform Fire Code. The Uniform Fire Code is 85 amended and changed in the following respects: 86 87 1. Article 1, Section 103.I.3 "Practical difficulties." Shall have the following paragraph added: 88 "Any variance to the Code shall be documented on a Variance Approval Form and shall be signed 89 by the Fire Chief or designee and the Fire Marshal. Variances shall be based upon an evaluation PAGE 2 9'72`20 90 of the circumstances. Variances shall only establish a precedent where similar circumstances exist 91 and where the Code adopted at the time of the variance is still current." 92 93 2. Article 1, Section 103.2.1.2 "Fire prevention personnel and police." Shall be deleted and the 94 following statement shall be inserted: "The authority of the Chief of the fire district or designated 95 members of the department to act as police officers shall only extend as far as the authority set 96 forth in § 32-1-1002, C.R.S. , or other applicable state statutes. 97 98 3. The following Section to be added to Article 1, and to be known as Section 103.4.7, 99 Compliance Agreements. 100 "The Board upon recommendation of the Chief or upon its own motion. may enter into written 101 agreements for enforcement or compliance with the owner, lessee, occupant or authorized agent 102 thereof, or any property, building or structure, or any interested person directly affected by the 103 application of this code. Said agreements may extend the time for compliance with this code, and 104 may contain such terms and conditions that the Board deems appropriate to adequately protect 105 the life, health, property. security and welfare of the general public." 106 107 4. The following section is to be added to Article 1, and to be known as Section 103.3.5 108 Inspections: 109 "Pursuant to § 32-1-1002(1)(e)(II) C.R.S. , the Board may fix and from time to time may increase 110 or decrease fees and charges , in its discretion, for inspections and review of plans and 111 specifications which are: 112 (a) Requested or mandated for existing structures, buildings and improvements; and 113 (b) Necessitated in conjunction with any county regulation, resolution or condition of 114 development; or 115 (c) Performed in conjunction with the construction of new structures, buildings, and 116 improvements. 117 118 Said fees and charges may. in the discretion of the Board, include a charge for reimbursement to 119 the District of any consultation fees, expenses or costs incurred by the District in the performance 120 of the inspections or review of the plans and specifications." 121 122 5. The following section is to be added to Article 1, and to be known as Section 101.10 "This 123 Article shall be interpreted to be consistent with the provisions of § 32-1-1002(3), C.R.S." 124 125 6. Article 1. Section 105.1 shall be amended by the addition of a sentence reading as follows: 126 "No such permit shall be required where burning is regulated pursuant to regulations 127 promulgated under § 25-7-123, C.R.S. and regulated by the Weld/Larimer County Health 128 Departments or municipal authorities. 129 PAGE 3 972E>20 130 7. Appendix III -B shall be supplemented by the following: 131 132 "Supplement to Appendix BI -B 133 Types of Hydrants: 134 Fire Hydrants shall be the Mueller Centurion or the Waterous Pacer. The Waterous Pacer shall be 135 equipped with an upper standpipe section with a nominal height equal to the Mueller Centurion. Fire 136 hydrants shall be dry barrel. Fire hydrants shall have two 2 '/z" ports and one 4 ' " port. All thread 137 shall be National Standard Thread, (NST). Fire Hydrants shall operate by opening in a counter - 138 clockwise direction and closing in a clockwise direction. The hydrant shall have the standard five sided 139 nut on the port caps and the operating stem. The hydrant shall be installed with the 4'/" port facing 140 the roadway. 141 Hydrant Installation: 142 Fire Hydrants shall be constructed such that an isolation valve is located between the hydrant and the 143 water main. The valve shall be accessible. 144 The hydrant shall be installed so that the base flange is above grade with at least the base flange bolts 145 exposed, and not greater than five inches from the grade to the bottom of the base flange bolts. 146 Hydrants shall have a break away section per manufacturers specifications. The breakaway should be 147 installed level with grade. 148 All fire hydrants shall be installed with a course gravel bed to ensure adequate drainage from hydrant 149 weep holes. Thrust blocks shall be installed in accordance with AWWA and NFPA . 150 Hydrants shall be visible and accessibie for fire fighters without difficulty. Vegetation and 151 landscaping shall not conceal the hydrant. 152 153 Hydrant Spacing: 154 Residential - Fire Hydrants should be no greater than 600 feet apart; with no structure greater than 155 300 (600/300). 156 Multi -Family Residential - An individual analysis for each Multi -Family Residential area will be 157 conducted to ensure coverage of all areas of structures and to provide adequate fire flows. 158 Commercial and Industrial - An individual analysis will be conducted for spacing and will be dependent 159 on fire flow requirements, spacing may be between 500/250 for light commercial to 250/250 for 160 industrial. 161 Low Density Residential - An individual analysis will be conducted for each rural subdivision where 162 lots within the subdivision are equal or greater than 2 acres. Low Density Residential shall comply with 163 residential unless the District approves an alternative. Alternatives shall be based upon the individual PAGE 4 972620 164 analysis and the proposal submitted by the developer. Cisterns, dry hydrants and open water sources 165 are not acceptable alternatives. 166 Hydrants on streets without access to structures or where no structural hazard is present shall be 167 spaced at 1000 feet, except in rural areas where water supplies may not be available. 168 Hydrants shall not be more than 10 feet from an approved fire access or roadway. The grade from the 169 roadway or access and the hydrant shall be near to level. 170 The placement of hydrants in developments without a grid type street design will be based upon an 171 evaluation by the fire department to ensure operational needs. 172 Placement of hydrants in dead end streets shall be based upon the distance of the street from the 173 intersection to the end of the street. 174 The placement of hydrants at the end of the dead end street is for use as a blowout and it is not 175 credited for use in fire fighting operations. 176 Blowouts should meet the same criteria as hydrants for fire fighting operations, or designed to ensure 177 that the blowout will not adversely affect fire fighting operations due to failure. 178 Streets with islands may require additional hydrants unless the hydrants are placed in the islands. 179 Fire Flows: 180 Fire flows shall be not less than 1000 gpm at 20 psi minimum for single family residential. Multi - 181 Family Residential will be evaluated based upon the size of the structures involved. Commercial and 182 industrial fire flows will be calculated based upon the size of facility and occupancy." 183 SECTION VIII: Enforcement Procedures and Appeals. 184 185 I. The Chief shall enforce this code and shall inspect or cause to be inspected all buildings, 186 structures, property, premises, and public places, except the interior of any private dwelling, in 187 accordance with the procedures set forth in § 32-1-1002(3). C.R.S. All inspections shall be 188 recorded in an inspection report. 189 190 2. A "Notice of Violation or Hazard" may be issued by the Chief or his designee concerning 191 violations or hazards which are not corrected on -site during an inspection. Said Notice shall be 192 signed by the inspector and contain, as a minimum, the following information: 193 a. Date of inspection; 194 b. Name/address of premises inspected; 195 c. Name ot rnspecto ; 196 d. Nature of violations, including specific reference to section/subsections of code; 197 e. Date of compliance/reinspection; 198 1 Suggested methods of correction, if applicable; 199 g. Right to appeal to Board: 200 h. Consequences of failure to correct the violation. PAGE 5 972tT () 201 202 3. An "Order for Immediate Correction of Hazard" may be issued by the Chief 203 a. For Failure to correct a violation or hazard within the time specified in a previously issued 204 Notice of Violation or Hazard; or 205 b. For violating the code or state statute and said violation renders the building structure or 206 premises especially liable to fire or is hazardous to the safety of the occupants thereof, 207 or which is so situated as to endanger other property as set forth in § 32-1-1002(3)(c), 208 whether or not a Notice has been previously issued. 209 c. An Order shall be signed by the Chief or his designee and shall contain, as a minimum, the 210 following information: 211 i . Date of issuance; 212 ii. Name/address of premises inspected; 213 iii. Nature of violation or hazard; 214 iv. Time limit for correction; 215 v. Right of appeal, if any. to the Board; 216 vi. Right of appeal to the District Court and time limit; 217 vii. Penalties for violation of order; 218 viii. Signature of the Chief or his designee; 219 ix. Acknowledgment of receipt signed by owner, lessee, agent or other responsible person. 220 221 4. An appeal of a Notice of Violation or Hazard may be made to the Board by delivery to the 222 Chief in writing a notice of appeal within five days of the issuance of the Notice of Violation or 223 Hazard. The appeal shall be heard at the next regular meeting or special meeting called for that 224 purpose. The Board may affirm. rescind, or modify the Notice and may enter into such 225 enforcement agreements as it deems proper. 226 227 228 5. An appeal of an Order for Immediate Correction of Hazard may be made to the Board only 229 if no previous appeal has been made of a previously issued Notice of Violation or Hazard 230 concerning the same violation or hazard. An appeal of an Order must be in writing and filed with 231 the Board within three days of issuance of the Order. 232 233 6. The Board shall hear ail such appeals and application for relief and render its decision 234 thereon in accordance with its bylaws, rules and regulations. 235 236 7. In the event no appeal is made to the Board pursuant to this code and resolution or to the 237 court pursuant to § 32-1-1002(3). C.R.S. , and compliance with the Order and/or correction of 238 the hazard has not occurred, the Board may upon recommendation by the Chief or upon its own 239 motion refer the matter to the district attorney of the county in which the violation occurs. 240 PAGE 6 9'721^O 241 8. An appeal shall suspend the time limits for compliance or correction of a fire hazard or 242 hazards, until the appeal is resolved for appeals of a Notice of Hazard which is issued pursuant to 243 Section VIII. paragraph 3(a) herein. An appeal shall not suspend the time limit for compliance or 244 correction of life safety deficiencies or violations. An appeal of an Order issued pursuant to 245 Section VIII, paragraph 3(b) herein shall not suspend the time limits for compliance or correction, 246 and compliance or correction shall be made or rendered forthwith, unless the Order is suspended 247 by the Board. 248 249 SECTION IX: Penalties. 250 251 1. Any owner. lessee, agent. or occupant of any building or premises maintaining any condition 252 likely to cause fire or to constitute an additional fire hazard or any condition which impedes or 253 prevents the egress of persons from such building or premises in violation of the provisions of 254 § 32-1-1002(3). C.R.S., shall be deemed to be maintaining a fire hazard. Any person who violates 255 any provision of said subsection 3 is guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction thereof, shall 256 be punished by a fine of not less than $50.00 or no more than $250.00. Each day in which such 257 violation occurs shall constitute a separate violation of § 32-1-1002(3), C.R.S. 258 259 2. The application of the above penalty shall not be construed to prevent the enforced removal 260 or correction of prohibited conditions or other injunctive relief 261 262 SECTION X: Repeal of Conflicting Ordinances or Resolutions. 263 264 All former ordinances or resolutions enacted by the District or parts thereof conflicting or 265 inconsistent with the provisions of this resolution of the Code orstandards hereby adopted are 266 hereby repealed. 267 268 SECTION XI: Validity and Conflict. . 269 270 The Windsor - Severance Fire Protection District Board of Directors hereby declare that should 271 any section, paragraph. sentence or word of this resolution or of the code or standards hereby 272 adopted be declared for any reason to be invalid, it is the intent of the Windsor - Severance Fire 273 Protection District Board of Directors that it would have passed all other portions of this 274 resolution independent of elimination here from of any such portion as may be declared invalid. 275 It is further the declaration of the Windsor - Severance Fire Protection District Board of Directors 276 that no provision of this resolution or the code or standards adopted herein be interpreted in 277 conflict with existing State law. In the event there is a conflict between State law and this code. 278 State law shall take precedent. 279 PAGE 7 972x;,0 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 ATTEST: 292 293 294 295 SECTION XII: Date of Effect. This resolution shall take effect and be enforced within incorporated municipalities and unincorporated portions of Weld/Larimer Counties from and after its approval as set forth in § 32-1-1002(1)(d) C.R.S. Adopted this 7? day of 41 , 1997. WINDSOR - SEVERANCF PROTECTION DISTRICT T�*ident of the Board lC cgetary of the Board PAGE 8 972�TO TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Bruce T. Barker, Weld County Attorney VIIDeDATE:December 4, 1997 RE: Request by Windsor -Severance Fire Protection District for COLORADO Consent to Applicability of 1994 Uniform Fire Code In March, 1997, the Windsor -Severance Fire Protection District sent me a letter requesting that the Board of County Commissioners adopt a resolution consenting to the applicability of the 1994 Uniform Fire Code, with certain amendments, in the Districts unincorporated area of Weld County. The request is pursuant to C.R.S. § 32-1-1002(1)(d), which says the following: "(1) In addition to the powers specified in § 32-1-1001, the Board of any Fire Protection District has the following powers for and on behalf of such District: (d) To adopt and enforce fire codes, as the Board deems necessary, but no such code shall apply within any municipality or the unincorporated portion of any county unless the governing body of the municipality or county, as the case may be, adopts a resolution stating that such code or specific portions thereof shall be applicable within the fire protection districts boundaries;" I sent the request to Ed Stoner, Lead Inspector, for his comments. When his comments came back, I sent them to the Fire Protection District, which then responded with letters. Various correspondence went back and forth. All of that is attached. Ed Stoner had concerns about the Fire District's amendments to Section V., Item 7; Supplement to Appendix III -B of the 1994 Code. That concern involved the requirement that fire hydrants be installed in certain locations. I have spoken with Dan Graham, Fire Marshall for the Windsor - Severance District, about Mr. Stoner's concerns. Mr. Graham explains that the Fire District's amendments actually make the requirements less restrictive than does the 1994 Code. Another concern of Mr. Stoner's was that often times fire districts will put strict requirements on developers regarding fire safety improvements. Those developers have a tendency to call the county commissioners in an effort to put pressure on the fire district to back down from the requirements. Mr. Graham explains that the Fire Code includes an appeals process whereby anyone who feels that the requirements of the Fire Marshall are outside the authority of the fire code, he or she may appeal the matter to the Districts Appeal Board. This request has been scheduled for a work session on December 15. 1997. Mr. Graham will be present to answer questions. 972r20 Fire Protection District December 4, 1997 Page 2. I recommend that the Board adopt my proposed resolution which consents to the applicability of the 1994 Uniform Fire Code in the unincorporated portions of the Windsor -Severance Fire Protection District. The application of the 1994 Uniform Fire Code in the unincorporated portion of the District will be consistent with the 1994 Uniform Codes which the Board of County Commissioners adopted in the fall of 1996. Bruce -t. Barker Weld County Attorney BTB/db: Memo/BOCC/Firecode Attachments pc: Monica Daniels -Mika Lee Morrison 972r ^0 Windsor - Severance Fire Protection District P.O. Box 308 Windsor, Colorado 80550 Weld County Board of County Commissioners C/O Bruce Barker, County Attorney PO Box 1948 915 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80632 March 13`h, 1997 On February 13`h, 1997 the Windsor - Severance Fire Protection District Board adopted the 1994 Uniform Fire Code, as amended (see attached). In accordance with the Colorado Revised Statutes* the Windsor - Severance Fire Protection District Board requests a resolution of adoption by the Weld County Board of County Commissioners for those areas within the District's boundaries which are also unincorporated areas of Weld County. Please contact Dan Graham, Fire Marshal (686-9596) for further information. Sincerely, 'I1'- Tom Buxman President of the Board Windsor -Severance Fire Protection District PO Box 308 Windsor, Colorado 80550 Attachment: 1994 Uniform Fire Code as Amended and Adopted *CRSA § 32-1-1002, Fire protection districts —additional powers and duties (lxd) To adopt and enforce fire codes, as the board deems necessary, but no such code shall apply within any municipality or the unincorporated portion of any county unless the governing body of the municipality or county, as the case may he, adopts a resolution stating that such code or specific portions thereof shall be applicable within the fire protection district's boundaries; except that nothing in this paragraph (d) shall be construed to affect any fire codes existing on Tune 30, 1981, which have been adopted by the governing body ofa municipality or county. Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, no fire protection district shall prohibit the sale of permissible fireworks as defined in > section 12-28-101(8), C.R.S., within its jurisdiction. Windsor - Severance Fire Protection District Office of the Fire Marshal 728 Main Street Windsor, Colorado 80550 October 22, 1997 Bruce T. Barker Weld County Attorney's Office 915 10th, Street PO Box 1948 Greeley, Colorado 80632 RE: Request for Clarification, dated August 25, 1997. Dear Mr. Barker, ELD COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE I have been somewhat delayed in reviewing your request for clarification. The Fire District covers two counties and two towns. At the present time Larimer County, the Town of Windsor and the Town of Severance have passed resolutions accepting the adoption of the Uniform Fire Code as amended by the Fire District. Your letter requested clarification in response to Mr. Stoner's concerns. I understand Mr. Stoner is no longer with Weld County. I will still respond to the concerns addressed to the Fire District. Mr. Stoner was concerned about how we would address fire code issues with a builder or developer. At the present time the County Planning Department sends referrals to the Fire District. The Fire District reviews the proposal and responds to the County with our requirements. This function will not change if we use the UFC rather than arbitrary requirements. The issue of how we work together should be contained within an Intergovernmental Agreement rather than in a code. The Fire District does not have the authority to issue building permits and I have never had a builder or developer ask me for a permit to build. The Uniform Fire Code is a companion document to the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, etc. The Uniform Codes promulgated by the International Conference of Building Officials and the International Fire Code Institute are by design to be used together. Why would anyone working with the Uniform Codes oppose the use of the companion documents? 97Zr^�1 The County has two methods of establishing "fire safety standards". The County can accept the "fire safety standards" adopted by the Fire District or develop standards according to the following statute: "§ 30-15-401.3. Fire safety standards (1) In addition to any other powers granted by the general assembly, the board of county commissioners of each county has the power to adopt ordinances to provide for minimum fire safety standards which shall be modeled upon those contained in the uniform fire code, including the table of contents, indices, appendices, and tables, as promulgated by the international conference of building officials, the international fire code institute, and the western fire chiefs association. (2) A board of county commissioners may adopt such ordinances only after it has approved the formation of and received the recommendations of a permanent commission, to be known as the fire code adoption and revision commission. The commission shall consist of the board or its designees, the fire chiefs whose departments or districts lie partially or wholly within the portion of the affected county encompassed by the proposed fire code, and such other members as the board may appoint. Members of the commission appointed by the board shall serve at the pleasure of the board. Members of the commission shall receive no compensation or reimbursement of expenses for their services on the commission." If the County has adopted such standards I would like to get a copy so that we can compare the document with the 1994 UFC as amended. If the County has not adopted any such standard, then the Fire District will have adopted a more restrictive "fire safety standard." Even if the County has already adopted fire safety standards it can also accept the version adopted for the Fire District even though it will be different than the rest of the County. If the County does not accept the application of the fire codes within the County then the authority of the Fire District is then altered by statute. "§ 32-1-1002. (1) In addition to the powers specified in section 32-1-1001, the board of any fire protection district has the following powers for and on behalf of such district: (0 In areas of the special district where the county or municipality has rejected the adoption of a tire code submitted by the fire protection district, to compel the owners ofpremises, whenever necessary for the protection of public safety, to install fire escapes, fire installations, fireproofing, automatic or other fire alarm apparatus, fire extinguishing equipment, and other safety devices. This paragraph (1) shall not apply when a valid ordinance providing for fire safety standards, pursuant to section 30-15- 401.5. C.R.S, is in effect " Under this statute it would appear that the Fire District could compel a developer to install fire hydrants (other safety devices) in a subdivision. It would appear through both statutes that the State intended for fire departments/districts to be the authority on fire safety. The fire districts and departments have political boards that act on appeals. Through the wisdom of our form of representative government the people within our district have the right to change the direction of our board. In the last couple of years the voters have expressed that they want improved fire safety. Who would the County be serving by rejecting what our elected officials have adopted. 9'72"'..;' As to the question about who has the higher authority, the most restrictive requirement must be met when government entities overlap jurisdiction. An individual who sought to appeal any restriction would have to appeal to the "board with jurisdiction". Would the County really want to hear appeals on fire inspections, citations, reviews, and other decisions by the Fire Prevention Bureau? Or is it more appropriate for the Fire District Board to hear such appeals? There was also a question regarding the use of alternative measures. The question can not be answered without specific circumstance. As with any form of waiver the specific circumstances must be reviewed. There are always minimum standards and specific cases where allowances are made due to specific circumstances. Cisterns, open water sources and dry hydrants have inherent problems. Please see the attached photos of the open water source at Willow Springs Subdivision. The County approved this project and issued building permits without an effective means of supplying water for fire protection. The open water source and the dry hydrant were a waste of time and money. Why wasn't the water line properly sized to carry adequate water to the subdivision? The fire hydrants in the subdivision will not provide enough water pressure for one fire truck because of the size of the water lines. We would really like to avoid this situation again. Any alternative that we review will be based upon good engineering judgment and sound fire safety practices. We would again request that the Board of County Commissioners accept the 1994 Uniform Fire Code as amended by the Windsor -Severance Fire Protection District, for the purpose of protecting lives and property through nationally recognized fire safety standards, just as your Building Department uses the 1994 Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, and associated standards. With Respect, Dan Graham Fire Marshal 3 - T. vat aim Wi�Yc COLORADO Dan Graham, Fire Marshal Windsor/Severance Fire Protection District P.O. Box 308 Windsor, CO 80550 FAX: (970) 686-9623 Dear Mr. Graham: WELD COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE PHONE: (970) 356-4000, EXT. 4391 FAX: (970) 352-0242 915 TENTH STREET P.O. BOX 1948 GREELEY, COLORADO 80632 August 25, 1997 RE: Request for Clarification Regarding June 23, 1997, Letter I have reviewed your June 23, 1997, letter, which was in response to a Memorandum written by Ed Stoner and regarding the Windsor/Severance Fire Protection District adoption of the Uniform Fire Code in the unincorporated portions of Weld County, Colorado. After reading your letter, I have the two questions: A. Your response to Mr. Stoner's points regarding Section V, Item 3, states the following: "The District's authority to seek compliance with fire safety provisions of existing laws and ordinances does not supersede the authority of the Weld County Government." It is my understanding that Mr. Stoner was concerned with permits issued by the Board of County Commissioners where the applicants are given time parameters for compliance with the requirements of the Uniform Fire Code. The time parameters usually state that the Fire Code requirements must be met before building permits are issued. Mr. Stoner's concern was that you may be inclined to grant extensions for compliance with the Fire Code requirements through "compliance agreements" and give the permitees the false impression that building permits will issue shortly after they sign such agreements. Another example of possible conflict are those cases in which the Board of County Commissioners requires a less restrictive method of fire suppression than does the District. The cisterns, dry hydrants, and open water sources v. water distribution systems and hydrants debate comes to mind. Are you saying that in these cases, where there is an apparent conflict between the requirements of the District and the requirements of the County Commissioners, that the Commissioners' requirements will supersede those of the District? 97 n(',n Letter, Graham August 25, 1997 Page 2 B. Part "c)" of your response to Mr. Stoner's concerns regarding Section V, Item 7; Supplement to Appendix III -B, states the following: "These compliance agreements can and have included areas where the requirements for fire hydrants could not be met, but where substantial compliance is met using approved alternative measures." Does this mean that if someone comes to your office and says he or she cannot comply with, for example, the requirements of a water distribution system and hydrants because they are not available, that you will grant the individual a variance as part of the "compliance agreement" and pursuant to Sections 103.1.2 or 103.1.3 of the Code, so that he or she may use the alternatives of cisterns, dry hydrants, or open water sources? Your assistance in answering these questions will be most appreciated. Please feel free to call me at (970) 356-4000, ext. 4390, if you have any questions. Sincer€ly, uce T. Barker Weld County Attorney BTB/db:Let/Graham pc: Monica Daniels -Mika ,3. S. -''. IM .t. 101.7-103.1.4 1994 UNIFORM FIRE CODS 101.7 Severability. If any provision of this code or the application thereof to any person or eir• cumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the code and the application of such provision to oth r persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby. • 101.8 References to Appendix. When this code references the appendix, the provisions in the appendix shall not apply unless specifically adopted. 101.9 Amendments. When reference is made to a portion of this code or other applicable laws or• ordinances, the reference applies to all amendments and additions now or hereafter made. SECTION 102 - RETROACTIVE APPLICATION TO EXISTING CONDITIONS 102.1 Existing Conditions. The provisions of this code shall apply to conditions arising after the adoption thereof, conditions not legally in existence at the adoption of this code, and to conditions which, in the opinion of the chief, constitute a distinct hazard to life or property. See also Appen- dices I -A and I -B. SECTION 103 - INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT 103.] General. 103.1.1 Technical assistance. To determine the acceptability of technologies, processes, prod- ucts, facilities, materials and uses attending the design, operation or use of a building or premises subject to the inspection of the department, the chief is authorized to require the owner or the in possession or control of the building or premises to provide, without technical opinion and report. Person cn, opinion or fire -safety The specialty piion and report shall be prepared charge i theengin jurisdiction, spe a the a qualified engineer, er, shall analyze the fire-safetyes organization acceptable to chief and the owner and and the facilities and appurtenances tsituatedof e thereon, to recommend necessary design, operation or use of the building or premises es. 103.1.2 Alternate materials and methods. The chief, on notice to the building official, is autho- rized to approve alternate materials or methods, provided that the chief finds that the proposed de- sign, use or operation satisfactorily complies with the intent of this code and that the material. method of work performed or operation is, for the purpose pre- scribed in this code in quality, strength, effectiveness, ffectivenes , fire resistance, durability and safety. Approv- als under the authority herein contained shall be subject to the approval of the building whenever the alternate material or method involves matters regulated by the Building Code. official The chief is authorized to require tests as proof of compliance with the intent of thicodeeSuch alternate material or method of construction. tests shall be made by an approved agency at the expense of the person requesting approval of the 103.1.3 Practical difficulties. The chief is authorized to modify any of the provisions of this code upon application in writing by the owner, a lessee or a duly authorized representative where there are practical difficulties in the way of carrying out the provisions of the code, provided that the spirit of the code shall be complied with, public safety secured and substantial justice done. The particu- lars of such modification and the decision of the chief shall be entered upon the records of the de- partment and a signed copy shall be furnished to the applicant. 103.1.4 Appeals. To determine the suitability of alternate materials and types of construction and to provide for reasonable interpretations of the provisions of this code, there shall be and hereby is created a board of appeals consisting of five members who are qualified by experience and training to pass judgment upon pertinent matters. The chief shall be an ex officio member and shall act as secretary of the board. The board of appeals inted office at their pleasure. The board shaadopt reasl onable rules y deregulationexecutivesfor conducting its investigations and shall render decisions and findings in writing to the fire chief, with a duplicate copy to the appellant. 1-2 tt `UNIFORM =`+ 1031.5 App(':::fi .; atiecernen 1-• :;:103.? Author:A, 1032.1 Autnurit 103.2.1.1 Gellert direction. r- c to: 1. The 2. The •>: 3. The •••••"- 4. •Fhe and fire.es:in;:+:u; s. The nt::nt:tl t). Tito t:.::::: n in_s, structure.. ar 7. The ntair.:,:n S. The hazardous a:at:::t For authi•ra'.:e 103.2.1.2 Fire pr vc: t!nn 1>u:.::u sh; When .,:c:ueaa po:ite cs'it'c':': a'; . j03.1.1 l)rct:mitt 103.2?.1 ( ienert rection 01 the chit function rfthis 'It :dons of this cor1C. 103.7.2.2 Fire m exercise the poke fire ;:reventiun .n 103.3 Inspection 1113,3.1 General. 103.3.1.1 Authot buildings and Drat purpose of ascer:a cause lire or,:ontrt tine other law ar s 103.3.1.2 Right provisions pith's( buildine or upon chief is authoriree perform any duty: Windsor - Severance Fire Protection District Office of the Fire Marshal 728 Main Street Windsor, Colorado 80550 June 23, 1997 Bruce T. Barker Weld County Attorney's Office 915 10th, Street PO Box 1948 Greeley, Colorado 80632 RE: Memorandum from Ed Stoner Regarding Windsor -Severance Fire Protection District Adoption of the Uniform Fire Code. Mr. Barker, The memorandum prepared by Mr. Stoner has been reviewed. The Windsor -Severance Fire Protection District as a Special District has adopted the 1994 Uniform Fire Code with the intention of using the UFC to provide for fire safety requirements not addressed in the Uniform Building Code. Through Colorado's Special District statutes the District already has the authority to enforce fire safety related provisions of the Uniform Building Code as adopted by Weld County, 1) Section V, Item 3; a) Mr. Stoner expressed concern that the District could sign agreements -with owners, lessees, occupants, or authorized agents to extend time for compliance with the Uniform Fire Code." In accordance with Special District statutes the District already has authority to sign agreements, which include fire safety provisions of the Uniform Building Code, Zoning and Building Ordinances; not just the Uniform Fire Code. The District's authority to seek compliance with fire safety provisions of existing laws and ordinances does not supersede the authority of the Weld County Government. In a society with multiple government agencies there is the probability that one agencies requirements will be more or less restrictive than the other particularly when some overlap occurs with jurisdictional boundaries. Under the Special District statutes the appeals process for fire safety violations is through District Court, and under the Uniform Fire Code the District Board is the Appeals Board. The adoption of a Uniform Code with an appeals board other than the court system reduces arbitrary decisions. As the Appeals Board under the Uniform Fire Code the District has the authority to enter into agreements with involved parties. To continue to use District Court as an appeals board is costly to the public and does not result in any less conflict with provisions of Weld County Ordinances. b) Weld County does not currently have a fire code adopted for use throughout the County. Weld County has adopted the Uniform Building Code, 1994 edition. The Uniform Fire Code 1994 edition is the companion document to the 1994 UBC. The two documents are designed not to conflict. The application and interpretation of the fire safety provisions of the two codes may result in conflict between the District and the County departments. It was the intent of the law makers in requiring Special Districts to have fire codes adopted by County Governments in unincorporated areas to reduce the probability of conflict. 2. Section V, Item 7; Supplement to Appendix III -B a) This section of the amended code does require fire hydrants, but it does not require public water supplies. The Uniform Fire Code Appendix III -B, Fire Hydrant Locations and Distribution provides for a more conservative requirement than the amendment. Adequate water resources can be developed in any location. It is probable that in many locations the cost of developing water resources may be cost or "profit" prohibitive. b) The amended code prohibits the use of cisterns, dry hydrants and open water sources for use in lieu of water distribution systems and hydrants. The prohibitions on the use of these types of sources is directly related to historical problems in the adequacy of these systems. The Willow Springs subdivision has an open water source with a dry hydrant. At this time and for the majority of the time the water source is dry. The subdivision is serviced by a six inch water line with hydrants. The open water source was designed to supplement the hydrants. The developer of the property met the initial requirements to construct the water source. In just a three year period since the project was approved the open water source is nonfunctional. Cisterns have historically been used for domestic water supplies. When a cistern is used as a domestic water source the property owner has a direct and immediate need to maintain the water supply. When a cistern is used for fire protection the owner rarely verifies that the water level and condition are satisfactory. Cisterns have been found with broken connections, no water, and contaminated water with floating debris. The quality and quantity of water in cisterns is not regulated such as a public water supply. A poor quality water source can result in damage to pumps in fire trucks and ultimately the loss of the structure on fire. c) It should also be noted in reference to Mr. Stoner's prior concern the Fire District has the ability to negotiate with property owners for compliance agreements. These compliance agreements can and have included areas where the requirements for fire hydrants could not be met, but where substantial compliance is met using approved alternative measures. ,'7%I. It is the intent of the Fire District to protect the lives and property of the residents of the District. Mr. Stoner is concerned that the Fire District may cause undo hardship on development in Weld County. It should be our combined concern to ensure that there should not be an undo hardship placed upon the government agencies trying to provide services to the developments. It is common for the most hazardous situations to be developed in areas with the least ability to respond to the hazards. Whereas there may be no need for Fire Codes in open prairie lands, where growth and urbanization of rural areas exist the need for Fire Codes is evident. Urban growth and sprawl in California has resulted in areas where fires consume large developments unchecked by local fire services. It should also be noted that California also has a major government agency dedicated to fighting fires in the urban -rural interface which does not exist in Colorado. In essence the Fire District is constrained within certain limitations (statutory and financial) to provide services to the residents of our district. It is within these constraints that we are seeking to limit the potential for hazardous conditions. In the interest of pursuing the adoption of the Uniform Fire Code as Amended within the Windsor -Severance Fire Protection District we would like to schedule a workshop meeting with the Board of County Commissioners to discuss the issues. Please let us know when we can sch - • ul : a meeting. an Fire Marshal 92 r.'..0 wID€. COI OAADO Tom Buxman, President Windsor -Severance Fire Protection District P.O. Box 308 Windsor, CO 80550 Dear Mr. Buxman: May 22, 1997 WELD COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE PHONE: (970) 356-4000, EXT. 4391 FAX: (970) 352-0242 915 TENTH STREET P.O. BOX 1948 GREELEY, COLORADO 80632 RE: Memorandum from Ed Stoner Regarding Windsor -Severance Fire Protection District Request Enclosed is a copy of a Memorandum of Agreement dated April 30, 1997, from Ed Stoner, Lead Combination Inspector, addressed to me. The Memorandum is regarding the Windsor -Severance Fire Protection District request for Board of County Commissioners to consent to the enforcement of the 1994 Uniform Fire Code, with amendments, in the Districts unincorporated portions of Weld County, Colorado. It is my understanding that either you or Fire Marshall Dan Graham will address Mr. Stoner's concerns. Your comments should be sent to my office at: 915 Tenth Street, P.O. Box 1948, Greeley, Colorado 80632. If you should have any questions or comments regarding this letter or the enclosed, please feel free to call me at (970) 356-4000, extension 4390. 1 BTB/db:Let/Buxman Enclosure pc: Ed Stoner Monica Daniels -Mika Sin c rely, rece T. arker Weld Coi my Attorney Mot,r MEMORANDUM WN`Pg TO: Bruce Barker, Weld County Attorney April 30, 1997 COLORADO From: Edwin D. Stoner, Lead Combination Inspector SUBJECT: Adoption of the 1994 Uniform Fire Code with Amendments Windsor - Severance Fire Protection District I have reviewed the submittal from Tom Buxman, President of the Windsor - Severance Fire Protection District, concerning the adoption of the 1994 Uniform Fire Code as amended. There are items of concern that need to be resolved prior to the Weld County Board of County Commissioners addressing this resolution. Those items are as follows: 1. Section V, Item 3; Amendment to Article 1, addition of Section 103.4.7 This new Section would allow the Fire District to enter into agreements with owners, lessees, occupants, or authorized agents to extend time for compliance with the Uniform Fire Code. These agreements could be in conflict with, and/or be less or more restrictive than the Weld County Zoning and Building Code Ordinance. 2. Section V, Item 7; Supplement to Appendix III -B A. This supplement appears to require that a fire hydrant be installed in the following locations, whether there is public water or not: a. Within 300 feet of all residential construction, including those homes not within a subdivision. b. Multi -Family Residential c. Within 250 of any commercial or industrial facility. d. Subdivisions where lots are equal or greater than 2 acres. B. This Supplement prohibits the installation of cisterns, dry hydrants, and open water sources. If it is the intent of the fire district to require fire hydrants at these locations, this may place an undo hardship upon the owner and/or developer in those area with an inadequate water supply. There are no provisions provided in which the Board may intervene and have input into alternatives. This would have a negative impact upon much of the development within Weld County. Edwin D. Stoner Lead Building Inspector p.c. Monica Daniels -Mika 972r A?,0 WUDc. COLORADO Tom Buxman, President Windsor -Severance Fire Protection District P.O. Box 308 Windsor, CO 80550 Dear Mr. Buxman: WELD COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE PHONE: (970) 356-4000, EXT. 4391 FAX: (970) 352-0242 915 TENTH STREET P.O. Box 1948 GREELEY, COLORADO 80632 April 17, 1997 RE: Windsor -Severance Fire Protection District Request Enclosed please find a copy of a Memorandum addressed to Ed Stoner, Lead Combination Inspector for Weld County, regarding the Windsor -Severance Fire Protection District request for the Board of County Commissioners' consent to the enforcement of the 1994 Uniform Fire Code and Standards, with amendments, within the District's unincorporated areas of Weld County, Colorado. Also enclosed is a copy of a resolution which I have prepared for the Board consideration on April 30, 1997. As we discussed in our telephone conversation earlier this week, the Board will consider this matter on April 30, 1997, at its regularly scheduled Board meeting at 9:00 a.m. That meeting with take place in the Board's first floor meeting room, Centennial Center Complex, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado. It is my understanding that you will attend that meeting. Please feel free to call me at (970) 356-4000, extension 4390, if you should have any questions regarding this letter or the enclosed. BTB/db:Let/Buxman Enclosures pc: Clerk to the Board's Office Stne�rely,,.. arker Weld County Attorney COLORADO TO: Ed Stoner, Lead Combination Inspector FROM: Bruce T. Barker, Weld County Attorney DATE: April 18, 1997 RE: Request by Windsor -Severance Fire Protection District Attached is a copy of a letter which I received from Tom Buxman, President of the Board of Directors, Windsor -Severance Fire Protection District, which requests the Board of County Commissioners to consent to the enforcement by the District of the 1994 Uniform Fire Code, as amended, in the District's unincorporated area of Weld County. I have set this matter on the agenda for the Board of County Commissioners for its Wednesday, April 30, 1997, meeting. Also attached is a copy of a draft resolution that I have prepared for the Board's signature on that date. Please review the attached letter and resolution from the Windsor -Severance Fire Protection District and let me know if you see any conflicts with Weld County's version of the fire code. Thanks for your assistance in this matter. BTB/db:Memo/Windsor Attachments pc: Monica Daniels -Mika Clerk to the Boards Brura'1. Barker eld County Attgrrtey 97"x,74 Hello