HomeMy WebLinkAbout971904.tiffAmendment to the Weld County Comprehensive Plan
PLANNER: Kerri D. Keithley CASE NUMBER: CompAmend-10
DIRECTOR: Monica Daniels -Mika
REQUEST: To amend the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. The amendment would replace the
existing Mixed Use Development (MUD) Area Structural Land Use Map located on page 3-
22, with the new MUD Area Structural Land Use Map approved and adopted by the Board
of County Commissioners in Ordinance 191 on January 29, 1997.
Staff Summary:
On October 14, 1996, Ordinance Number 147-J was approved by the Weld County Commissioners. This
Ordinance adopted the MUD Structural Land Use Map 2.1, currently found in the Comprehensive Plan, as
well as changed verbiage in the Comprehensive Plan to correspond with the upcoming MUD Plan
(Ordinance 191). During the Board of County Commissioners' hearings for the MUD Plan, however,
property owners in the area proposed several land use changes to the map. A community meeting was
held to discuss these changes and allow property owners to select a land use category which they felt was
most appropriate for their site. Staff then presented the citizen revised map to the Board of County
Commissioners. On January 29, 1997, the Board officially adopted the MUD Structural Plan including the
revised Structural Land Use Map.
The adoption of the MUD Plan and the revised Structural Land Use Map presented the dilemma of
conflicting maps with the Comprehensive Plan. The amendment today, is to rectify this situation by
replacing the current Structural Land Use Map on page 3-22 with the approved Structural Land Use Map
found in the MUD Plan.
Enclosed in this packet, is the existing Structural Land Use Map 2.1 currently in place in the Weld County
Comprehensive Plan, and the new Structural Land Use Map 2, adopted by the Board of County
Commissioners.
971904
ion l-23 MUD Area Boundary
Fmpb„nent Cents — High Intensity
Rplawl Commercial — Medium Intensity
( � � NNkhbaTood Center — Lows Intensity
Residents
Limning Ste Factors — Lowest Intensity
Regional Pak
Community Park
Neighborhood Park
Trateit Cents
Historic/Community Center
Toon/Sty Annexations
— — County Boundary
Existing Rood
Rankin' Trail System
Other Community Troy
- -- Section Line
1-25 Mixed Use Developement Area Structural Plan
Map 2.1 Structural Land Use Map
February 3,1997
BEFORE THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Moved by Marie Koolstra, that the following resolution be introduced for passage by the Weld County Planning
Commission. Be it resolved by the Weld County Planning Commission that the proposed amendment be
recommended favorably to the Board of County Commissioners for the following reasons:
The Planning Commission recommends that the Structural Land Use Map 2.1 found on page 13 of the Mixed
Use Development Plan, replace the Structural Land Use Map 2.1 on page 3-22 of the Weld County
Comprehensive Plan. Staff requests this amendment to the Weld County Comprehensive Plan for the following
reasons:
1. The existing Structural Land Use Map in the Weld County Comprehensive Plan is in need of revision.
On January 29, 1997, the Board of County Commissioners adopted Ordinance 191 which included
a revised Structural Land Use Map 2.1. This amendment replaces the previous Structural Land Use
Map with the revised and approved map.
2. The proposed amendment will be consistent with existing and future goals, policies and needs of the
County.
Motion seconded by Glenn Vaad.
Vote:
For Passage Against Passage
Glenn Vaad
Fred Walker
Marie Koolstra
Jack Epple
Rusty Tucker
Shirley Camenisch
Arlan Marrs
The Chairman declared the resolution passed and ordered that a certified copy be forwarded with the attached
materials to the Board of County Commissioners for further proceedings.
CERTIFICATION OF COPY
I, Tammie Pope, Recording Secretary of the Weld County Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the
above and foregoing Resolution is a true copy of the Resolution of the Planning Commission of Weld County,
Colorado, adopted on April 15, 1997.
Dated the 15th day of April, 1997.
Tammie Pope
Secretary
WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
April 15, 1997
Page 9
Fred Walker moved that Case Number USR-1143, KKDD-FM Broadcasters, be forwarded to the Board of
County Commissioners with Conditions of Approval, with the addition of #BG, and the Development Standards
with the Planning Commission's recommendation for approval. Rusty Tucker seconded the motion.
Glenn Vaad stated that he will vote against the proposal due to surrounding property owner opposition and the
fact that four miles north of the proposed site there are existing towers where perhaps this tower could be
placed. Fred Walker stated that he would be willing to withdraw his motion if more discussion is necessary.
Mr. Vaad moved that Case Number USR-1143, KKDD-FM Broadcasters be forwarded to the Board of County
Commissioners with the Planning Commission's recommendation for denial. No one seconded the motion.
The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision regarding
the first motion. Glenn Vaad-no; Fred Walker -yes; Marie Koolstra-yes; Jack Epple-yes; Rusty Tucker -yes;
Shirley Camenisch-yes; Arlan Marrs -yes. Motion carried.
CASE NUMBER: CompAmend-10
PLANNER: Kern Keithley
REQUEST: To amend the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. The amendment would replace the existing
Mixed Use Development (MUD) Area Structural Land Use Map located on page 3-22, with the
new MUD Area Structural Land Use Map approved and adopted by the Board of County
Commissioners in Ordinance 191 on January 29, 1997.
Kerri Keithley stated that Ordinance 147-J was approved by the Board of County Commissioners on October
14, 1996. This ordinance adopted the MUD Structural Land Use Map 2.1 currently found in the Weld County
Comprehensive Plan. During the Board of County Commissioners Hearing for the MUD Plan, certain things
changed. A community meeting was held and citizens identified changes they felt were appropriate in certain
sections of the map, mainly in sections 10, 15, and 16. Citizens identified land use Residential as opposed to
Employment Center, as listed in the Comprehensive Plan. After the MUD Plan was adopted, the dilemma was
that the Comprehensive Plan map was different from the MUD map. This amendment rectifies that situation.
The map is the only thing that is changing; the verbiage will remain the same.
Fred Walker asked why the Planning Commission is involved after the Board of County Commissioners have
already approved it. Ms. Keithley explained that any Comprehensive Plan amendment goes first to the
Planning Commission and then three times to the Board of County Commissioners. Mr. Walker asked if this
has already been read once by the County Commissioners. Ms. Keithley stated no. The MUD Plan, which the
Planning Commission heard in November, 1996, has gone through the entire process, but the map does not
match what was approved in the Comprehensive Plan. Shirley Camenisch asked if the Board of County
Commissioners will have to hear three readings again. Ms. Keithley stated yes.
Arlan Marrs asked how many landowners are in the areas to be changed. Kerni Keithley estimated 20-25. The
landowners were allowed to color their property on the map the color they thought it should be. Mr. Marrs
asked if all the property owners effected by this had a say. Ms. Keithley stated that in those three sections
particularly, yes. Mr. Marrs asked if it is possible for the landowners to change their land use at some future
point. Ms. Keithley stated that it is possible, they would just have to go before the Planning Commission and
then the Board of County Commissioners.
The Chairman asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak for or against this amendment.
No one wished to speak.
Marie Koolstra moved that CompAmend-10 be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with the
Planning Commission's recommendation for approval. Glenn Vaad seconded the motion.
WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
April 15, 1997
Page 10
Kerri Keithley noted that the legend key says "ResidentiaVAgricultural Mixed Intensity", but the "Agricultural"
should be deleted. Agricultural uses are already allowed, they are not planned. If the property owner wanted
to develop the property, the map would have to be amended.
The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Glenn
Vaad-yes; Fred Walker -yes; Marie Koolstra-yes; Jack Epple-yes; Rusty Tucker -yes; Shirley Camenisch-yes;
Arlan Marrs -yes. Motion carried unanimously.
Meeting adjourned at 3:50 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Tammie Pope
Secretary
From: LEE MORRISON
To: gdunn, dcarroll, charding
Date: 6/23/97 4:40pm
Subject: buffalo ridge
Reply requested when convenient
i have reviewed the collateral agreements and road improvement agreement s and find them to be adequate in form. The
proposed form of collateral is to be deeds of trust on the 3-7 phases of the project to secure the 1st two phases. The cost
of work to be secured is $356,688 and the value of —68% of the entire project by lots (35/521ots x $490,000)= -$ 333,200. (
similar figures are reached for the ratio of net acres} This does not technically meet the %100 collateral provision of the
policy for collateral. The appraiser has indicated that the appraisal is very conservative and that under current market
conditions the remaining phases would likely increase in value once construction commences on the 1st 2 phases. This is
partially offset by the payments required for improvement to the County roads due at the completion of phase two of
$83,058for wcr 35 and completion of phase 6 for wcr 10 of $34,133. I am of the opinion that the value of the collateral is
adequate to protect the County's interests although technically slightly deficient .
Should the Board accept the propsed collateral, deeds of trust will need to be provided along w/ title work for phases 3-7
CC: bbarker, mmika
■
T00'd TL9L'0N xll/X.L 9S:90 L6/EZ/90
I00f13j
MEMORANDU
TO: Lee Morrison, Asst County Attorney DATE June 23, 1997
FROM: Don Carroll, Project Administrator
SUBJECT: S-414, John T. and James T. Marti
This memo is in response to Mr Childs, Martin's representative, follow-up vi to Buffalo Ridge
Subdivision. The purpose of the visit was to reinspect the grading portion of the ibit A regarding
release of collateral of the street grading.
I drove the site with Mr. Childs and inspected Phase 1 and Phase 2 of Fling', 1. I pointed out a
couple of small back slope problems and a few weeds to be removed. These a very minor items.
Mr. Childs has indicated to me that these problems would be taken care of o r the weekend.
I have no conflict in releasing the collateral on any portion of the grading of Ph se 1 and Phase 2
of Filing 1.
cc: Commissioner Harbert
Bill Childs
Gloria Dunn, Planning
S-414 file
plm2O
)RIO& Jflthld a -MA 898Z ZSC 0L6 %V3 92:LO L6/CZr90
FILE No.622 06/23 '97 1200 ID:WELD CTY GOVT
FAX:9703520242
PAGE 1
Mr. Mitch Martin
147 South 1)eovtx Avenue
Fort Lupton, CO 80621
R II: Appraisal of Buffalo Ridge Estates
Dear Mr. Martin:
Mitelten, .Axton & McCarty, LLC
Real 1istate Appraisers anti Ctnuelranra
I I CO letli Stre•1, Win lop Greeley, CC 806 (I 971115? 1 t 11 FAX 9211.'62 I I to
April 10, 19197
Post -1r• Fax Notn 7871
TO
Ca. apt
Phone a
eX N
4,
rizon401,
Co.
Rion a
OW p
As per our letter of engagement dated March 38, 1997, we have appraised the Buffalo Ridge Ustatas subdivision
located southeast of Fort Lupton in Weld County, Color elo. 'The properly consists of a platted 52 lot subdivision on
195,472 acres. Roads have been cot and minimal road base lets been applied.
The purpose of the appraisal k to estiimim the market value of the subject property as of the dale et' fuxpin;tion. The
function is for Weld County tq use valualioc figures arrived at in this report us cellularal far the improvements
agreement between the developer and the county,
The property rights appraised on, the fee simple interest subject to easements and encumbrnnccs of record. The
emanate provided in Market Value which is defined at a biter page in the report.
On April 17, 1997, we inspected the subject in the company et Mitch Martin, rep reseotativc toy the smiled property
owners. An interview Was also conducted with hill Childs, marketing agent for the development, on the same day.
We submit herewith three copies of the report which describes the methtxls used and which shown an analysis oldie
data and reasoning involved in arriving at our conchisrons. Value el' the subject properly as or April 17, 1997, is:
FOUR IIIINDRED NINETY THOUSAND DOLLARS
($490,000)
JUN 2 3 1997
(arms • Ranches • Water Rights
Respect llill49;
lys�trhm iced,
ysso
Kevin McCarty
Certified General Appraiser
No. Ct201319902
411:1;414J. .49071.2.1,
Robert .1. tehell, MM
Certified General Appraiser
No. CCi01313141 •
06/23/97 11:02
TX/EX NO.7675 P.001
•
FROM : MARTIN BROS
PHONE NO. : 3038572471 Tun. 24 1997 11:03AM P1
DUOLer I. A. • chimeOV 0867-IPrt
a VGLCY I. MJ"', tW60 V.jilt 'IBt6-197P.
STANLEY A B. •CA
CORMS'. F COO.
yryLyM 5 MEYER
JAM=L. CAL^PgN100.Jw
RAMP I., Pr pr
HEATH[R R "Y J
CLARK G. L' 'AAhin
DAYTON PAC ARC
JAPSS LNG' .Nb
Th ncnttsOY BLACK ArCD Coos. 1LG
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
131E SPRUCE STREET
SO OLD ER. CO LOP ADO eG3O*4S I6
rzaHONt COSI 44 -SS Is
TELECOPIER ISO31 442JSBBS
Iti+thbc4 C.6Om
PoiOV IDINO LCOAL YGR VICES BINGO IOW I
MAILING ROOMERS
P. O. SCR 117a
MOl1LDER. COLORADO 8030+• 1170
March 31, 1997
Dana Vincent Martin
3711 N. Gleba Road
Arlington, VA 22207
Re: Estate of John T. martin
Dear Dana:
JOHNS GRLER
C.BRAD PETERSON
PECHAL-C. NPIER
6TCYCN A. ERICLQC.<
CARLA WILLIAMS 6LL{1GL
IOW= D. nIC=RWC'
PATRICIA M. S tOWA
T. WIMPY HV?.AMtON
ROBERT G.RIMER
S.•KO
Clara Lee Martin Was appointed by the Weld County District
Court on March 80, 1999, to serve em personal representative of the
suk`7ect estate pursuant to her nomination by the Will. This firm
is assisting her With the administration of the estate.
The Personal Representative is required to notify you, as an
heir -at -lam and in your capacity as co -trustee of the JOh T.
Martin Trust as a devisee, of her appointment by providing you with
the enclosed Infestation of Appointment.
If you have any questions regarding the Will or estate
administration, please feel free to call ma.
Very truly yours,
JLC/ch
Enclosure
cc: Clara Lee Martin
JUN 24 1997
to LL,aC::t L66T 22 'unS
Tames L. Carpenter, Tr.
-=ALT ars Emd. : -ON 3NOHd OJQh31 $ tlNdC) SWNION& NIIWW : WOW
06/24/97 10:04
TX/RX N0.7684 P.001
•
MUST BE TYPED
FILING FEE: $10.00
MUST SUBMIT TWO COPIES
Please include a typed
self addressed envelope
Mail to: Secretary of State
Corporations Section
1560 Broadway, Suite 200
Denver, CO 80202
(303) 894-2251
Fax (303) 894-2242
STATEMENT OF CHANGE OF
REGISTERED OFFICE OR
REGISTERED AGENT, OR BOTH
For office use only
19971065694 M
SO4
10.00
SECRETARY OF STATE
04-2rr97 12:44:37
Pursuant to the provisions of the Colorado Business Corporation Act, the Colorado Nonprofit
Corporation Act, the Colorado Uniform Limited Partnership Act of 1981 and the Colorado Limited
Liability Company Act, the undersigned, organized under the laws of:
STATE OF COLORADO
submits the following statement for the purpose of.changing its registered office or its registered
agent, or both, in the state of Colorado:
FIRST: The name of the corporation, limited partnership or limited liability company is:
MARTIN BROTHERS, L.L.C.
SECOND: Street address of current REGISTERED OFFICE is: 604 First Street
•
and if changed, the new street address is: 147 so
Flirt Lupton, CO 80621
Denver Avenue, Fort Lupton CO 80621
THIRD: The name of its current REGISTERED AGENT is: John T. Martin
and if changed, the new registered agent is:
Signature of Registered Agent
Principal place of business
Clara Lee Martin
147 South Denver Avenue, Fort Lupton, CO 80621
The address of its registered Office and the address of the business office of its registered agent, as
changed, will be identical.
MARTIN BROTHERS, L.L.C
Lee
Martin,
Name of Entity
Personal Representative of Estate
of John T. Martin, Deceased.
Its _MAA.ging Partner
Title
Swift and Associates
Town Planning•Urban Design•Civil Engineering
June 12, 1997
Request for
AMENDMENT TO THE WELD COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Mixed Use Development Area Map
According to the Comprehensive Plan Amendment Procedure, There are several criteria that must be
addressed for such a request. In the case of this project, we are under the provisions of the I-25 Mixed
Use District. Parts (1) and (2) ask, essentially, for reasons why the amendment should be approved. We
have included that discussion within the following framework to address all the required criteria. The
comments are as follows and are organized with respect to page 1-3 of the Comprehensive Plan;
a) Demonstrate [that] the proposed amendment is adjacent to and contiguous with the existing I-25
Mixed Use Development Area Map
The enclosed Exhibit A shows the project boundaries and the proposed location of the
neighborhood center. It clearly lies within the 1-25 MUD.
b) Describe how the proposed amendment will not place a burden upon existing or planned service
capabilities. This statement shall include how emergency services will be provided to the
proposed area
It is important to describe the intention of the amendment to clarify the design purposes.
The proposed development will be pedestrian oriented and sustainable. It proposes the
use of "town centers". These will not be employment centers of any magnitude. They will
accommodate the daily needs of the future population within a short walk of their house.
Uses may include a small grocery store, video store, dry cleaner, day care facility, a cafe
or restaurant, etc. The primary reason for the request is that we want to encourage
pedestrian activity and the opportunity for people to meet their neighbors when they
desire to do so.
Some of the advantages to this are;
• Reduction of up to 27% traffic trips,
• A centralizing focus to the town center, creating a sense of place,
• Lessening of environmental impacts,
• Provide a few local jobs and affordable housing.
These are just a few of the advantages to the proposal. There is a reduction of traffic
impacts to the adjacent road systems. This will reduce the County maintenance
obligation.
Incidently, the utility services will accommodate the proposed addition of a neighborhood
center. Directly across County Line Road there is a Mountain View Fire station along
421 21st Avenue, Suits 212, Looginnnt, Co, 90501 13031 772,7052 FAX 651-7226
with EMT service. We see no adverse impact to adjacent areas of the MUD, but, in fact,
see a great advantage to future residential development in their ability to access retail
and commercial services.
c) Delineate the number of people who will reside in the in the proposed area. This statement shall
include the number of school aged children and address the cultural and social service provision
needs of the community.
To address the last pan of the statement, this proposal very clearly accommodates the
social service and cultural needs of the community with the addition of day care and
places for entertainment on a local basis. It is also possible to include medical services
and additional cultural activity in the new Neighborhood Center. The additional town
center location will not only provide necessary daily general services, but will be within
walking distance of a large component of the development. The concern expressed in c),
above, is very important and relates directly to our proposed amendment to the
Comprehensive Plan.
There will be about 3,800 people in the project at full build -out. By allowing an
additional Neighborhood Center, we can make access to these areas much more
convenient.
A very rough number of children expected to attend public school is 400 or about a 15
year build -out period. Averaging, this would reveal about 27 students per year. These
numbers are clearly dependant on the residential density designed for the project. There
will be a design "charette" for the project starting June 23rd (Monday). Many decisions
relating to the design elements will be decided at that time. This is open to the public and
all are invited to be a part of this design effort.
We therefore request that the Weld County Commissioners look favorably upon this request and adopt
this amendment prior to our design effort so we can include it in our overall plan.
Peter Swift, PE
for
Donald J. Sherwood, owner
421 21 a1 nv.n.r. Suite 2@. Lnngnrom. CO, 50501 pW61 992.1052: FAX 65,.1220
I
I
E)4AIBIT A
Hello