The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About961310.tiff ,.�CEIV MAY 1__4/ 1996 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES 1 47 11 I II:'6PHONE (970) 353-6100, EXT.3540 FAX (970) 352-6312 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES ill e., 1400 N. 17TH AVENUE GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 COLORADO April 16, 1996 CASE NUMBER: Z-499 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from Rocky Mountain Trust, c/o Rusty Green for a Change of Zone from A (Agricultural)to PUD(Planned Unit Development C-1, C-2, C-3, 1-1 and 1-2). The parcel of land is described as the SW4 of Section 11, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is north of and adjacent to Weld County Road 22; approximately 1/4 mile east of 1-25 Frontage Road. For a more precise location, see legal. The application is submitted to your for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be_apprc ted. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application. Please reply by/Kay 8 1996, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. The failure of any egen o respond within 21 days may be deemed to be a favorable response to the County. Please call Shani Eastin, Current Planner, if you have any questions. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. . 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request is/is not compatible with the interest of our town for the following reasons. 3. We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to 5. Cr Please refer to the enclosed letter. ` Signed: Najd afiGdy Agency: Puia.c., Date: C (4 - C) :1 961310 41,(lift4 mErncRRnDum I Shani Eastin,Current Planner May 16, 1996 C� To Date COLORADO Don Carroll, Project Coordinator From Subject: Z-499, Rocky Mountain Trust, c/o Rusty Green The applicant has addressed many items in my previous memo dated December 29, 1995, at the sketch plan review stage (S-391)Del Camino East, Phase I. • Roadways: The applicant has placed on the mylar the typical local street cross section, which will be incorporated through the internal road system of the PUD. The applicant indicated eight inches of base and two inches of pavement. This will be the typical cross section unless the soils investigation, at the time of the final plat, requires more stability. WCR 22 Typical Cross Section: The applicant has identified the additional right-of-way required in the MUD that is necessary for this location. In my previous memo, at the sketch plan stage, I identified that the road base and pavement work should match the existing cross section in place. The business, industrial, and residential uses proposed in the PUD will greatly increase the traffic on WCR 22. The applicant needs to change the typical cross section to reflect 24 feet of pavement and six-foot shoulders to match the existing typical County cross section. The existing cross section was developed through a road maintenance agreement with the Del Camino Center Partnership, (DCCP). The improvement of this cross section was three inches of hot bituminous pavement and more than ten inches of aggregate base course (Class 6)24-foot wide pavement with six foot gravel shoulders. The applicant needs to submit a soils investigation report identifying the depth of the asphalt and base. The typical cross section at 24-foot wide pavement and six-foot graveled shoulders should be consistant with the existing width for both the pavement and graveled shoulders to meet the County's cross section standards. Storm Water Drainage: At the sketch plan stage, I asked about for the plan for pertaining to the drainage and storm water management. The design standards for storm water drainage are listed in the Weld County Subdivision Regulations. Will each site be required to detain storm viMfa sidtmipsifgritycitw rate to match the overall plan? MAY 17 1996 RECEIVED 961310 Shani Eastin, Current Planner May 16, 1996 Page 2 Access: The main access point is identified on the mylar along with a secondary access point. No lots will be allowed to access on to WCR 22. All lots will access on to a internal road system. Road Improvements and Maintenance Agreement: Please fmd attached a copy of the Del Camino Center Partnership agreement. This is just a sample of what Weld County Public Works Department will require prior to recording the final plat. cc: Commissioner Hall Z-499 file :plant 961310 r, COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this Gj_ day of 4.4.f 1989, by and between the COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO, hereinafter called "County" and DEL CAMINO CENTER PARTNERSHIP, hereinafter called "DCCP". o � WHEREAS, DCCP has applied to the County for a PUD Plan, Case No. S-300, for an industrial park development located. in the W1 of the NWT, Section 14, t" T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado and t WHEREAS, the development will increase traffic on County Road 22, and WHEREAS, the County Commissioners have requested the paving of a portion z w of Weld County Road 22, • ui • NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual convenants and conditions hereinafter set forth, the Counth and DCCP mutually agree as follows: En o H co o A. To execute an agreement pursuant to the Weld County Policy Regarding H Collateral for Improvements prior to .the initiation of any development z activiites in the Del Camino Center PUD which shall include provisions n,co as follows: • N• 1-3 1. Access onto Weld County Road 22 from the property shall be limited so to three, two of which may.be shared accesses. 7z1w rri 2. DCCP agrees to pay 37% of the total improvement costs for Weld County o Road 22. The total improvement costs are currently estimated to be $51,000 by the County. DCCP's share of the improvements is based d upon* a projected traffic count of 38.3 trips/acre on the property 7:) (=, adjacent to Weld County Road 22. o tr, o 3. Weld County Road 22 shall be improved from DCCP's east property line 0 west to the existing pavement at the intersection of Weld County Road 22 and the I-25 frontage road. The improvements shall consist 0 of a 3 inch thick by 24 foot .wide hot bituminous asphault with (2) 6 foot wide shoulders. The- base course shall be 10 inches thick ON and shall be Highway Class 6 aggregate. 4. DCCP, through the paving contractor yet to be named, will warranty and maintain the improved portion of Weld County Road 22 for a period of one year, after Such -time the County shall be responsible for maintenance. • • 8�9 890 / PURPORTED COPY 961310 • 5. All construction and materials shall be in accordance with the State Department of Highways, Division of Highways, State of Colorado, Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction,- latest—edition. 6. The County will provide testing and inspection for the construction. 7. No lots shall be platted or sold that access Weld County Road 22 until such time that the above mentioned portion of Weld County Road 22 is improved. B. DCCP agrees to participate in a Local Improvement District pursuant to CRS 530-20-601 et seq. in the event one is established to fund the improvements to Weld County Road 22 provided that the projected assessment is` equal to or less than the estimated cost of improve- ments in Paragraph A. In the event a Local Improvement District is established, DCCP shall not be required to enter into the agreement set forth in Paragraph A. DCCP shall agree to pay whatever amount is .assessed according to the benefit to the property by the Local Improvement District which is currently estimated at $18,870.00 subject to the limitation state herein. C. "Development Activities" include any construction, or issuance of building permits. • D. Parties agree that this agreement shall constitute a covenant running with the land. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly.executed the agreement the day and year first-above written. DEL CAMINO CENTER PARTNERSHIP BOARD. OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS By: - - Title: General Partne f Title: i BY: 1 */.. %eka41 Edwin S. Kanemoto Title: General Partner y- ATTEST: Weld County Clerk and Recorder • and Clerk to the Board /77�� By: /1/ �_ 9e/c74...4, 1 961310 • O ,,� : : -• ',Weld County Planning Dept OF PLANNING SERVICES ..0 frte & l :' , PHONE (970) 353100, EXT.3540 APR 2 2 1996 . FAX (970)352-6312 y• .,.3 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES O - 1400 N. 17TH AVENUE L, F 1 r! J� GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 • .1��,. rte' . COLORADO . April 16; 1996 CASE NUMBER: Z-499 ' TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from Pocky Mountain Trust, do Rusty Green)for a Change of Zone from A (Agricultural)to PUD(Planned Unit Development C-1, C-2, C-3, I-1 and 1-2). The parcel of land is described as the SW4 of Section 11,.T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M.,Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is north of and adjacent to Weld County Road 22; approximately 1/4 mile east of 1-25 Frontage Road. For a more precise location, see legal. • The application is submitted to your for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing O of the application. Please reply byLI1Aay 8 so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. The failure of any agency to respond within 21 days may be deemed to be a favorable response to the County. Please calllShani astin Current Planner, if you have any questions. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. (/ We have reviewed this request and find that it Does does/dsse•not comply with.our r10StidL CeoapCelwasive Plan for the following reasons. '¶Ntd lisp e r ors 1'#/D 1"(21"(204‹J Li v IAN s r L\Jt.D D.> 'n4 IS IRDPErJ.-r4 'a SaR3e. IT A.>., Pe ti ggnicor ADADzi-4 . f tof9seO ,Oc, » Aregu(R,,a e. 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request is/is not compatible with the interest of our town for the following reasons. 3. !/ We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to 5. PIe..s= efe' to e -nclosed letter. Signed: _ i Agency: ' 'f . )R? ) .9/1}O1'A 915ri?ic r Date: TO Ariz, \ I°kb O 961310 Welt! County Planninc pt. 6 APR 2 91996 IVEDAENT OF PLANNING SERVICES ! PHONE (970) 353-6100, EXT.3540 APR 8 1996 FAX (970)352-6312 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES O vy �, + 1400 N. 17TH AVENUE • GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 COLORADO April 16, 1996 CASE NUMBER: Z-499 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from Rocky Mountain Trust, Go Rusty Green for a Change of Zone from A (Agricultural)to PUD(Planned Unit Development C-1, C-2,C-3, 1-1 and 1-2). The parcel of land is described as the SW4 of Section 11, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M.,Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is north of and adjacent to Weld County Road 22; approximately 1/4 mile east of 1-25 Frontage Road. For a more precise location, see legal. The application is submitted to your for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application. Please reply by May 8, 1996, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. The failure of any agency to respond within 21 days may be deemed to be a favorable response to the County. Please call Shani Eastin, Current Planner, if you have any questions. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request is/is not compatible with the interest of our town for the following reasons.73. We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to 5. ^ Please re - to the en t o -d letter. Signed: l 1 � Agency: W C1, ‘rikilt4- � 6 (Date: j Wkiltoduak tkoaits4 5wAA, ' eOtz-etA, c-) ,_„,)vtropo oxy,k1k, 961310 St. Vrain Valley -fool District RE-1J r.Thelma Bishopp 395 South Pratt Parkway • Longmont•CO • 80501-6499 Asst. Superintendent for Human Resources 303-776-6200/449-7343 •FAX 303-682-7343 Thomas A.Garcia ®gpt. Director of Human Resources&P1ann Count Planning fanning MP( 011996 April 25, 1996 ' , D Shani Eastin Current Planner Weld County 1400 N. 17th Ave. Greeley, CO 80631 RE: Del Camino East Phase One, P.U.D. Dear Shani: Thank you for referring the Del Camino East Phase One, P.U.D. to the School District. From the description of the application it appears that this is for an industriaVcommercial business park. Without a residential component, there would be no impact to the School District. Thus, the School District would not be in opposition to this proposal. Should there be a residential component included that would result in school age children, the District would appreciate receiving the plans to determine any student impacts. The District is interested in implementing a land dedication or cash-in-lieu of land system whenever there is a residential component to a development. Any children from this area would attend Frederick Elementary and Frederick Middle/Senior Schools. The capacity and enrollment information for the Frederick Schools is identified below: CAPACITY ENROLLMENT ELEMENTARY: 8 4 0 8 1 3 MIDDLE/SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL: 6 1 8 5 3 3 Please let me know if there is any other information I can provide. Sincerely, ott Toillion, AICP Planning Specialist "Excellence-Our Only Option" 961310 04-26-96 10: 11 AM FROM POTT' "m SHi TL P003 • fi**ffall"44D - DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES �`a,�r�r9 ye it. PHONE (970)353-6100, EXT.3540 eta'g� WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES O \ \ 1400 N. 17TH AVENUE COLORADO� Pit 2 61996 �aeE��r, cO��RAD© 80881 oleo April 9E3, 1996 ixec CASE NUMBER: Z-4199 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed Is an application from Rocky Mountain Trust, cto Rusty Green for a Change of Zone from A (A{tricuttural)to PUD(Planned Unit Development C-1, 0-2,0-3, 1-1 and 1-2). The parcel of land is described as the SW4 of Section 11,T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M.,Weld County,Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is north of and adjacent to Weld County Road 22; approximately 114 mile east of I-25 Frontage Road, Fora more precise location,see legal. The application is submitted to your for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application, Please reply by May 8, 1996, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. The failure of any agency to respond within 21 days may be deemed to be a favorable response to the County. Please call Shard Eastln, Current Planner,if you have any questions. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it de* does/dose-not-comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. - 1 IA 010- • .t.a.- a _?• l - 44..r mss. toteg.1 aF.� s4S 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan,but we feel this request islis not compatible with the Interest of our town for the following reasons, 3. We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. - A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to 5. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Signed: ��_ Agency: r acres � G 1 , -.... Date: y�r f, 961310 04/26/96 09:08 TX/RX NO.3836 P.003 STATE OF COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Region 4 ' P OT 1420 2nd Street issonopmmem Greeley,Colorado 80632-0850 (970)353-1232 Weld County, I25 East Frontage Road Rocky Mountain Trust 1/4 Mile E. of I25 EFR on WCR 22 North Side Del Camino May 6, 1996 Ms. Shani Eastin - Current Planner Department of Planning Services Weld County Planning Dep • Weld County Administrative Offices 1400 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 MAY 1 0 1996 SUBJECT: Rocky Mountain Trust Shani, I have reviewed the Rocky Mountain Trust Change of Zone. Once the County has determined if a traffic increase of more than 20% will occur at the Weld County Road 22/East Frontage Road connection, the Department will be able to offer additional comments regarding necessary improvements to this intersection. Any improvements to the East Frontage Road will require an access permit from this office. Thank you. G is T. Hice-Idler Access Coordinator (970) 350-2148 xc: Fanning file (2) 961310 - GEOLOGIGAL_SURVEY TEL "i- . Jun ^1 ,96 14 :19 No .004 P.02 STATE OF COLORADO COLORADO GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Geology Division of Minerals and .Department of Natural Resources 1313 Sherman Street,Rourn 715 Denver,Colorado 80203 Phone(3031866-2611 FAX MA)$662461 r3?i1AKTMF.N'{'t NATURA RESOURCI June 21, 1996 WE-96-(X}14 fr,,,,u.,,,.cr iuvprrx)r Janx S.i c •hhcad Ms. Shani Eastin, Current Planner rx«„rr`)'"'"" 4u kg Weld County Department of Planning Services t)ivi cni3.re(k t)i"iriun Olrett/x 1400 North 17th Avenue Vicki coon Greeley, Colorado 80631 sr.riand I Director and Re: Proposed Camino East PUD -- Northeast of the Intersection of 1-25 and C.R. 22, Weld County Dear Ms. Eastin: At your request and in accordance with S.B. 35 (1972), we have reviewed the materials submitted for and made a field inspection of the .site of the proposed mixed-use and industrial subdivision indicated above. The following comments summarize our findings. (1) From the data presented in the submitted geotechnical report by CTL Thompson and our experiences other commercial and industrial development in this general area, this parcel should not present any extraordinary problems for the planned development if the recommendations made in the report are expressly followed. As demonstrated by the drill- hole data, every building site should have a detailed soils and foundation investigation and because of the ground-water conditions, structures with basements probably will not be feasible unless a foundation-drain system is used for individual structures and/or an underdrain system is installed beneath and over the entire parcel. (2) As much of the site that is planned to be developed is nearly level and flat (it is presently and agricultural field), it may, depending on specific site-development plans, be advisable to regrade part or all of the site to improve surface drainage. If the recommendations made above are followed and made conditions of approval of this development, then we have no geology-related objection to it. Sin rely, -�I es M. Soule ngineering Geologist • 961310 06/21/96 14:28 TX/RX NO.4321 P.002 Hello