HomeMy WebLinkAbout961764.tiff 08/06/1996 05:53 970-350-2198 CDOT REG 4 TRAFFIC PAGE 01
STATE OF COLORADO .
DEP.RTMENT Of TRANSPORTATION Regione OT
FAX TRANSMITTAL 'C-. .
DATE •/ ""ql.
TO: oars f
FAX # SS&-411Z�
" PHONE #
RE: XA eectrgilva a.
FROM: Tess M. Jones - Region IV Development/Access Coordinator
Colorado Department of Transportation
1420 2nd Street
Greeley, CO. 80631
Pages sent (including this form):
If there are any problems receiving this fax transmission, please call:
Tess at (970) 350-2163 or Brenda at (970) 350-2113
COOT Access Management Section fax number is: (970) 350-2198.
fs I r
NEMY Clti\i`4.4--- c&o.J ac - 4.4.c - l.i..`3 i� TSA/I S
-41a_ C4Qi Div..! ..-]h \ cS n Lat.__ !7L c.Miter
"Hi/aL I 08/06/96 06:00 TX/RX NO 961764 .
$ 9703959880 RBN ENINEERS P01
ft,r Pit,ea( 07/E1/1
- 15020
MOUNTAIN VIEW FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
([ Administrative Office
ar 9119 County lino Road•Longmont, CO 80501
- � + (303)772-0710 Metro(303)888-4404 FAX(303)851-7702
Mr. Michael C. Ketterling, P.E.
Weld CountKBN y Planning�23u1y 30, 1996
O8 Streetengineers, LLC PUG 5 1996
82
N
()Feeley, CO 80631
RE: Meadow Vale Farm - Fili�l��f�
Dear Mr. Ketterling:
I have reviewed the submitted drawings, dated 4/96, for compliance with the adopted
codes and standards of the Fire District. Only one set of drawings was submitted for
review, so an approved set of drawings is not being returned with this letter. If you
would like to have an approved set of drawings for your records, please send me
another set. I will approve and return them to you. Based on my review, I have the
following comments:
1. The street layout appears to meet the standards of the Fire District subject to the
following:
a. Temporary cul-de-sacs, with a diameter of 96 feet, are Installed as the
project is phased.
b. The landscaping on the islands in Meadow Vale Road are selected to
ago avoid the narrowing of the drives on either side of the island, and
A
ii i r. maintain the required 13 feet, six inches in height.
i c. The temporary access road from WCR 5 nfa is maintained as an all-
u weather road until Meadow Vale Road is completed to WCR 5 tfs as part
c of Filing 3. The approach and departure angles at the transition between
WCR 5 th and the emergency access route, and the transition between
M 1 8 k Meadow Vale Road and the emergency access route cannot exceed 12
degrees. The emergency access route needs to be able to support 60,000
N e4 lbs. of imposed load in all weather conditions. If the emergency access
M road is be closed off to non-emergency traffic at any tithe, then the
method of Closure is to be approved by the Fire District. (Fire Protection
I Development Standards Chapter 3)
X• F. M The fire hydrant locations for the entire project were not shown on the
a a submitted plans. The hydrants shown on the plans for Filing 1 meet the
,e• 0 d I 2 requirements of the Fire District for location and number. Prior to beginning
construction of other filings, the complete plans for the water system need to be
approved by the Fire District. (Fire Protection Development Standards Section
6.04-5)
818008 1 Sudan &YbnS SWbn 4 9Wbn6 8 Station
_ MO Common,.
CineO. llifrWe,c.,oa Mea Farms. l l+ ald'.rl Review P.Gaw,Gee PO au 40
Fcaml St
50801 80504 Mad.6O 80842 Moot, 8 is CO SO tai ao.CO0001.
FJp.CO SOWS Daiwa 000/4
I EXHIBIT
961764
274 08/05/96 14:23 TX/RX N0.4688 P.001 II
Ct 9703959880 ICBN ENINEERS P02
3. Street signs showing the street name and the address range need to be installed
throughout the subdivision. If standard street signs are installed, the signs do not
need to be submitted to the Fire District for approval. If signs other than
standard street signs arc installed, then those signs do need to be submitted to
the Fire District for review and approval. (Uniform Fire Code Section
10.301(b))
4. Installation of water lines, hydrants and roads is required to parallel construction
and storage of combustible materials on the site. (Uniform Fire Code Section
87.103)
5. The Fire District has a special concern about the proposed combination
irrigation and fire protection system. Documentation and calculations need to be
provided to the Fire District that demonstrate the following:
a. The required fire flow will be available with the irrigation demand at a
maximum. This needs to be done with a recognized modeling scheme
using measurable nodes (hydrants) as the most demanding locations.
b. The storage capacity is sufficient to provide the required duration of the
required fire flow on a year-round basis.
c. The method of controlling irrigation useage, if the required fire flow
and/or duration of fire flow is not available.
d. Plans for the pumping station, control system and power supply to
demonstrate me required reliability. (Uniform Fire Code Section 10.401)
If you have further questions, please contact me.
Sincerely,
Fire Prevention Specialist
CC: William N. Bailey, Deputy Chief, Fire Prevention
Meadow Vale Farms. Filing I - Road and Utility Plan Review
2 oft
961764
08/05/96 14:23 TX/RX NO.4688 P.002 •
00UNtA4t, MOUNTAIN VIEW FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Administrative Office:
9119 County Line Road•Longmont, CO 80501
E (303) 772-0710 Metro (303) 666-4404 FAX (303) 651-7702
VIEW
July 10, 1996
Mr. Todd A. Hodges, Lead Planner
Weld County Department of Planning Services
1400 N. 17th Avenue Weld County Planning Dept.
Greeley, CO 80631
JUL 1 2 1996
RE: Case Number:S-403
Meadows Vale Farms, Inc. RECEIVED
Dear Mr. Hodges:
I have reviewed the submitted materials for compliance with the adopted codes and
standards of the Fire District. The project is within the boundaries of the Fire District
and will receive service from the District. The Fire District has no objections to the
project if the requirements of the District can be met. Based on my review, I have the
following comments:
1. The minimum required fire flow is 1,000 gallons per minute at 20 pounds per
square inch. This flow is sufficient for a residence of 3,600 square feet. Larger
residences will have higher fire flows requirements, or will need to install
residential fire sprinkler systems. For the purposes of this requirement, the floor
area is the total area of all floors of the building within the exterior walls, and
under the horizontal overhang of the roof of the building. In a residence, it
includes all areas, finished and unfinished, and the garage. It should be noted
that there is an error in the proposed covenants in Article VI, Section 29 which
references this requirement. This section specifies that the fire flow calculation
includes only the finished floor area. This is not accurate. (Fire Protection
Development Standards Section 5.02-1)
2. Fire hydrants are required throughout the subdivision, with the locations for the
hydrants meeting the standards of the Fire District. Water supplies for fire
protection purposes, including the reliability of the on-site storage, are required
to meet the standards of the Fire District. Initially the water supply from the
Left Hand Water District for fire protection will meet those standards, however,
the on-site system, will need to be in service, tested and approved by the Fire
District before any transition from the Left Hand water supply will be approved.
Meadow Vale Subdivision, Filing 1 -Referral Response
1 of 2
Station 1 Station 2 Station 3 Station 4 Station 5 Station 6 Station 7
9119 Cnty Line Rd. 10971 WCR 13 P.O.Box 575 P.O.Box 11 10911 Dobbin Run P.O.Box 666 P.O.Box 40
Longmont,CO Longmont,CO 299 Palmer Ave. 8500 Niwot Road Lafayette,CO 600 Briggs 100 So.Forest St.
80501 80504 Mead,CO 80542 Niwot,CO 80544 80026 Erie.CO 80516 Dacono,CO 80514
961764
If the proposed private fire protection system cannot meet the standards of the
Fire District, then this could represent a substantial problem for the Developer
in the future. This possibility should be considered by Weld County as part of
the approval process for this subdivision. (Fire Protection Development
Standards Sections 5.02-1 and 6.04-5)
3. Access routes in the subdivision are required to meet the requirements of the
Fire District. Since the subdivision is planned for phased construction, access
must meet the standards of the District during the phasing. (Fire Protection
Development Standards Chapter 3)
4. Streets must be marked with signs showing the name and address range. If
standard street signs are used, then the signs do not need to be submitted to the
Fire District for approval. If signs, other than standard signs are used, then the
signs need to be submitted to the District for approval prior to installation.
(Uniform Fire Code Section 10.206)
If you have any questions, please contact me.
Sincerely,
Charles E. Boyes
Fire Prevention Specialist
CC: William N. Bailey, Deputy Chief, Fire Prevention
Doug Rademacher, Battalion Chief, MVFPD Stations Three and Two
Meadow Vale Subdivision, Filing 1 -Referral Response
2 of 2
961764
Weld County Planning Dept.
mEMORAnDUM JUL 15 1996
El IV C
Todd Hodges, Lead Planner July 12'3ECEl Y ED
To Date
COLORADO Don Carroll, Project Coordinator ♦0
From
Subject: S-403, Meadow Vale Farms Planned Unit Development
I have reviewed the submittal and the drawings and have the following comments:
The Meadow Vale Farm is located within the MUD area,which requires additional dedication of all
County-maintained roads.
Landscaping:
We will not allow and trees, shrubs, entry walls or fences placed within the 100-foot right-of-way
of WCR 5.5 at this location.
Road Improvement and Maintenance Agreement:
The applicant should enter into a Road Improvement and Maintenance Agreement with Weld County
Public Works on upgrading, paving, and realigning WCR 5.5 from the northern boundary of the
property to State Highway 119.
Utility Permits:
The applicant needs to acquire an underground utility permit from the Public Works Department
prior to beginning any utility work within the County right-of-way. Please contact Don Somer,
Utility Agent, (970)356-4000 Ext 3750 (office) or(970)381-3779 (mobile).
Access:
The applicant has indicated a temporary emergency access on to WCR 5.5 south of the main access.
The applicant will need to acquire a temporary emergency access from the Public Works
Department.
To Be Placed on the Mylar:
Cul-de-Sac Design Standards, Section No.10.2.1.13: The applicant needs to place on the mylar a
50-foot paved radius in accordance with the Subdivision Regulations.
Typical Cross Sections:
All typical cross sections will meet the Weld County Standards and the requirements set forth on our
memo dated May 8, 1995, at the Planned Unit Development sketch plan stage.
In the second filing of the WCR 5.5 Improvement Section, Sheet 14 of 22, the applicant needs to
indicate the depth of asphalt and base.
IDCHIBIT
961'764 -- -
Todd Hodges
July 12, 1996
Page 2
Upgrading,Paving and Realigning WCR 5.5:
The applicant has indicated that no improvements will be done to WCR 5.5 in the first phase. Once
the second phase begins, which will be after selling the 11th lot, the realignment, upgrading, and
paving from the main entrance south to State Highway 119 will occur. This will consist of new
realignment,paving, and widening the existing road 36 feet wide with 4-foot shoulders. This needs
to be shown on the cross-section. An additional auxiliary lane will be used as an acceleration lane
and a right turn lane on to State Highway 119. The northern most entrance will be constructed as
a future phase when the 60th lot is submitted for a building permit. The remaining asphalt section
north of the entrance will remain 24 feet wide with 4-foot shoulders.
State Access:
The applicant needs to obtain an access on to State Highway 119. Please contact Tess Jones,
Colorado Department of Transportation, Greeley Office.
Storm Water Drainage:
The applicant has addressed the storm water drainage with a detention pond at the sketch plan stage,
which will conform to Weld County standards.
Please see attached the memo dated May 8, 1995, at the sketch plan stage for the PUD.
cc: Commissioner Hall
S-403
plan8
961764
e 't mEmORAnDUm
�����• Gloria Dunn, Current Planner May 8, 1995
To Date
COLORADO From Don Carroll, Project Administrator 1k-'
S-379; Meadow Vale Farms, Inc.
Subject: Planed Unit Development Sketch Plan
I have visited the site and have reviewed the application and drawings and have the following comments:
In talking to Theresa Jones,Colorado Department of Transportation,Access Division,about the access from WCR 5.5
to State Highway 119 to determine how we could improve this access point by changing it to a 90° angle verses the
existing alignment. It would provide for a safer access on to St. Hwy 119. The applicant is indicates that a realignment
of WCR 5.5 will take place after ten lots are developed.
The applicant will dedicate the additional right-of-way to change WCR 5.5 to a collector status,which will require a
100'feet right-of-way through the development area. The segment of WCR 5.5 that is upgraded to a collector status
will be from St. Hwy 119 to the northernmost project entrance at the end of the property. It will be paved and
constructed in conformance with Weld County's standards. Paving will be constructed in phases with pavement to the
southernmost entrance being constructed and realigned at the time the 11th lot is submitted for a building permit. The
northernmost entrance will be constructed as future phases. At what particular time would the applicant be completing
the entire paving of WCR 5.5?
The applicant is indicating that all streets will be dedicated to Weld County and will be in conformance with County
standards. Is the applicant indicating that the internal road system be maintained by the Homeowners Association or
by Weld County? Interior streets will be designed in conformance with Weld County standards and will consist of 24'
wide asphalt surface with 4'grass-lined borrow ditches on each side of the road way.
Weld County Road 5.5 in the new realignment section needs to be built 36'wide with 4'gravel shoulders. An additional
auxiliary lane will be used as a acceleration and right turn lane on to St.Hwy 119. The remaining asphalt section north
from the entrance will remain 24'wide with 4'gravel shoulders. Fifty foot radiuses will be required at St. Hwy 119 and
30'radiuses will be required at both the south and the north entrances to the PUD.
The remaining section of WCR 5.5 has some horizontal and vertical curve problems through the PUD section. Once
this section is paved, speeds will increase, which will make the chance of an accident greater. Could the developer
possibly realign the curve in the PUD section?
The storm drainage will be carried through borrow ditches on the east end of the property. The detention pond will be designed in conformance with the Weld County standards.
cc: Commissioner Webster
S-379 file
:p1an7.dc
961164
SSt. girtain cSa12Ltation .l ,i.sttiet
p p (cSaint cSan) f�/ p p p
��eCe�iton£ 575�Vimbaxk cSt.,cSuits 109
(303)776-9570 ±on5moat,ClD 80501
July 5, 1996
Weld County Planning Dept.
Mr. Todd Hodges
Department of Planning Services JUL 1 1996
Weld County Administrative Offices 1
1400 N. 17th Avenue
Greeley, Colorado 80631 RECEIVED
Re: Final Plan Filing 1, Meadow Vale Subdivision P.U.D. (Case Number
S-403)
Dear Mr. Hodges:
I have reviewed the referral material you sent me, plus a more detailed
Preliminary Master Sanitary Sewer Plan for the entire subdivision provided
by Mr. Floyd Oliver. I will address each separately for both the County's
and Mr. Oliver's benefit.
Filing No. 1 (11 lots)
Easements. Either utility easements must be provided fran:
- SVSD Manhole A-75 to WCR 5.5,
- SVSD A-77 to Meadow Vale Road,
or a Note might be added to the Filing Plat to the effect that
perpetual rights of entry are granted for future maintenance and
operation in "open space" where sewer lines run.
An additional easement concern is where sewers run under the
internal streets. The third paragraph of Attorney Droegenuller's
letter states that interior streets will be dedicated to County but
maintained by homeowner's association. Yet there is also an
agreement subtitled Private Road Maintenance. If streets are
dedicated to County, no problem; but if they are indeed private, a
similar Filing Plat Note providing for access will be needed.
Line Size.
District engineering standards call for 0.4% mini.rman grade for
8-inch and 0.28% for 10-inch PVC lines. The line from SVSD Manhole
A-75 to WCR 5.5 and the north stub are on a 0.3% grade. These must
be 10-inch lines.
atiiini
961764
Mr. Todd Hodges
July 5, 1996
Page 2
Connections to District System.
As shown the design proposes the insertions of new manholes
adjacent to SVSD Manholes A-75 and A-77. This is unsatisfactory.
The Meadow Vale connection must be directly into SVSD Manholes A-75
and A-77. Manhole A-77 is a drop manhole. An internal PVC drop
secured by stainless steel fasteners is acceptable, so long as it
doesn't interfere with normal ingress into the manhole.
Manhole Numbering.
Manholes must utilize SVSD numbering conventions and all drawing
must so conform. Manholes off of A-75 would read A-75-1, A-75-2,
etc. Manholes off a lateral connection at A-75-2 would read
A-75-2-1, A-75-2-2, etc.
Underdrains.
Drawings and/or Notes must address how and where sewer underdrains
daylight.
PVC Pipe Specification.
Add SDR-35 to Note 8; Sheet 9 of 22.
Line Dedication.
A Service Agreement between the Developer and SVSD will be required
to provide for construction warranties and dedication of lines for
future maintenance and operation. This Service Agreement can cover
the entire Meadow Vale subdivision. The District is initiating its
preparation.
Total Subdivision. In addition to the above comments, the following
pertain:
Inclusion into the District.
The portion of this Subdivision located in Section 5, T2N, R68W,
Sixth P.M. is not within the District. (Filing No. 1 is within
Section 4 and within the District. ) A Petition for Inclusion must
be submitted and approved prior to development extending into
Section 5. This takes 45-90 days, depending upon when it is
submitted.
Line Size.
The line in WCR 5.5 extending north to Manhole labeled A-6 must be
10 inch due to mimimun grade standards. The District wishes to
continue this line at its 993,360 GPD capacity, and will rebate
961764
Mr. Todd Hodges
July 5, 1996
Page 3
$100.00 per single family tap for oversizing, should oversizing be
required to maintain this capacity.
Easements.
In addition to 20-foot easements on lot lines where sewer lines
run, which have been provided in Filing No. 1, the following
additional easements are required:
- 20-foot Easements or Note regarding Open Space Access south of
Farm House lot and south of Block 16 where sewer leaves WCR 5.5
ROW.
- 20-foot Easement along east side of Block 17 (school site) to
serve area to the north.
- 20-foot Easement between Lots 3 and 4, Block 14, to serve area
to the north. This will require alignment of Manhole A-13 on
this property line.
- 20-foot easement between Lots 4 and 5, Block 13, to serve area
to the north. Manhole C-3 location appears satisfactory.
- 20-foot easement from Manhole B-11 to west boundary, should Blue
Mountain Road not be continued to west boundary.
- 20-foot Easement between Lots 8 and 9, Block 8. Manhole G-5
appears to be properly located.
I trust this meets your needs. Please call me if you have any questions.
Very truly yours,
ST. VRAIN SION DISTRICT
ByLi14-
L. D. Lawson, P.E.
Manager
LDL:mcj
cc: Mr. Floyd Oliver
961764
<eceNEn 05/ oo/ lib
9So3C
SF FT UF,
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
ae r CORPS OF ENGINEERS, OMAHA DISTRICT
- p4119" TRI-LAKES PROJECT OFFICE, 9307,STATE HWY 121
LITTLETON, COLORADO 80123-6901
REPLY TO
ATTENTION OF May 6, 1996
Mr. Michael C. Ketterling, PE
KBN Engineers
820 8th Street
Greeley, Colorado 80631
RE: Nationwide Permit No. 199680401
Dear Mr. Ketterling:
We have reviewed your request for Department of the Army authorization to fill
approximately 0.66 acre of wetlands at the Meadow Vale Farm Development (your
Project No. 95030) for road construction. The project is located in the South ' of
Sections 4 and 5, Township 2 North, Range 68 West, Weld County, Colorado.
Based on the information you provided, this office has determined that your work
within Colorado can be authorized by the Department of the Army Nationwide Permit
found at 33 CFR Part 330 Appendix A, (B)(26). Enclosed is a fact sheet which fully
describes this Nationwide Permit and lists the General and Section 404 only conditions
which must be adhered to for this authorization to remain valid.
Although an Individual Department of the Army permit will not be required for
the project, this does not eliminate the requirement that you obtain any other applicable
federal, state, tribal, or local permits as required. Please note that deviations from the
original plans and specifications of your project could require additional authorization
from this office.
You are advised that this verification of the nationwide permit authorization is
valid until January 27, 1997.
If you have any questions concerning this determination, please feel free to contact
Mr. Terry McKee of my staff at (303) 979-4120 and reference Nationwide Permit File
No. 199680401 and Weld County.
Sincerely,
T' . Carey
— Project anger
EXHIBIT
Printed on ; W: Rwyc Paper 9e--
961764
LEFT HAND WATER DISTRICT
Dept. of Planning Services July 1, 1996
Weld County Administrative Offices
1400 N. 17th Ave.
Greeley, CO 80631
Re: Case Number S-403 Meadow Vale Farms Inc.
To Whom It May Concern:
The Left Hand Water District has been working with the developer of
the above referenced PUD. We will supply water for household use
through a master meter to this development, and our understanding
is that after a short construction period, landscape irrigation
water and fire flow will be provided from untreated water sources.
The District supports the use of untreated water when possible for
non-potable purposes. We are in support of this request, and would
recommend approval.
Sincerely,
LEFT HAND WATER DISTRICT
Kathy ete on
Generah Manager
Weld County Planning Dept.
JUL 0 9 1996
DECEIVED
EXHIBIT
(191
P.O. Box 210 •Niwot CO. 80544•(303) 530-4200 • Fax (303) 530-5252
961764
STATE OF COLORADO
OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER Weld County Planning Dept.
of coy
Division of Water Resources F� R\
Department of Natural Resources 7 (�
1313 Sherman Street, Room 818 JUL 1 8 1996 \� ,
Denver,Colorado 80203 \rays
FAX(3(3)8866-89 RECEIVED
Romer
FAX(303)866-3589 Roy Romer
Governor
July 15, 1996 James S.Eochhead
Executive Director
Mr. Todd A. Hodges, Lead Planner Hal D.Simpson
Weld County Planning Department State Engineer
915 IOth Street
Greeley, CO 80631
Re: Meadow Vale Farms, Filing 1, S-403
SW 1/4 Sec 4, T2N, R68W, 6TH PM
W. Division 1, W. District 5
Dear Mr. Hodges:
We have reviewed the above referenced proposal to develop an 89 lot single family
residential subdivision, with each lot 1 acre or greater in size, on a 155.61 acre site. The Water
Supply Information Summary requested in the State Engineers memorandum of August 7, 1995,
was not included and no water supply requirements were identified. The Left Hand Water
District is to be the water provider, and a letter of commitment for service was included. Water
for a non potable irrigation system will be from the Oligarthy Ditch with irrigation water stored
in an on site pond to be constructed for that purpose. The applicant should document the
irrigation arrangement and use of the ditch water to establish that all uses are in accordance with
the uses decreed for the water to be used.
Because no details of proposed use of non potable water were provided, we cannot
comment on the potential for injury to existing water rights or the adequacy of the proposed
water supply under the provisions•of Section 30-28-136(1)(h)(ll) C.R.S.
If you have any questions in this matter, please contact John Schurer of this office.
Sincerely,
Su-No
cistSte Lautens lager
Assistant State Engineer
SPL/JS
cc: Richard Stenzel, Division Engineer
Water Supply Branch
mendoewv
961764
07/17/1996 10:03 3036518696 CITY OF LGMT PAGE 03
itt
s"
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
PLANNING DIVISION
Weld County Planning Dept.
Civic Center Complex / Lanpnont, CO 80501 -.30R by
(303) 651-8330 / FAX # (303) 6514696
July 16, 1996
JUL�.1 7 1996
Mr.Weld CoudntyHDepartmenttoofmPlanning Services Planner ECaa 19I E®
1400 N. 17th Avenue
Greeley, CO 80631
RE: Case Number S-403
Dear Todd:
Thank you very much for sending the Meadow Vale Fauns PUD, First Filing - Final Plan to the
City of Longmont for our review and comment. This proposed PUD is located north of SH119
and west of WCRS' . I understand that the first filing includes the first 11 lots to be developed
in the 89 lot PUD.
The City previously commented on both the sketch plan and the change of zone applications. The
applicant has responded to several of Longmont's comments, and the City appreciates the
applicant's efforts to address those concerns. The change of zone application indicated that after
WCR51 is realigned at its intersection with SH119, the area vacated after realignment will be
landscaped with tress and non-irrigated turf. The City has commented about the possible
landscaping and long term maintenance of the triangular remnant parcel that is between the
existing and future rights-of-way for WCRS1, and has thought that its landscaping may be an
appropriate improvement necessary for creating a scenic entrance corridor along SH119. A
portion of this remnant parcel, along with the portion of WCRSrk which is to be vacated, is
included in the first filing. The landscape plan submitted with this filing does not show the
landscaping and maintenance for either this remnant parcel nor the vacated portion of WCRS'h.
If Weld County concurs that landscaping of these areas is appropriate, it may be a detail you want
to resolve as part of your review and approval of this first filing.
Thank you very much for the opportunity to comment on this application, If you have any
questions about this referral response, please call Froda Greenberg at 651-8330.
maw
07/17/96 10:09 TX/RX NO.4546 P.003
961764
07/17/1996 10:03 3036518696 CITY OF LGMT PAGE 04
Sincerely, J�'_A/leaestse-CBrad Schol
Planning Director
xc: Phil DelVecchio, Community Development Director
File; #2050-4b3
07/17/96 10:09 TX/RX NO.4546 P.004
961764
Hello