HomeMy WebLinkAbout941428.tiff RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
MINUTES
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
JANUARY 26, 1994
TAPE #94-06
The Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, met
in regular session in full conformity with the law and bylaws of
said Board at the regular place of meeting in the Weld County
Centennial Center, Greeley, Colorado, January 26, 1994, at the
hour of 9:00 A.M.
ROLL CALL: The meeting was called to order by the Chairman and on roll call
the following members were present, constituting a quorum of the
members thereof:
Commissioner W. H. Webster, Chairman
Commissioner Dale K. Hall, Pro-Tem
Commissioner George E. Baxter
Commissioner Constance L. Harbert
Commissioner Barbara J. Kirkmeyer
Also present:
Weld County Attorney, Bruce T. Barker
Acting Clerk to the Board, Shelly Miller
Finance and Administration Director, Don Warden
MINUTES: Commissioner Hall moved to approve the minutes of the Board of
County Commissioners meeting of January 24, 1994, as printed.
Commissioner Harbert seconded the motion, and it carried
unanimously.
READING OF
ORDINANCE: FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 88-G BY TAPE: Commissioner
Kirkmeyer moved to read Ordinance No. 88-G by tape, and
Commissioner Baxter seconded the motion which carried
unanimously.
ADDITIONS: There were no additions to today's agenda.
CONSENT AGENDA: Commissioner Baxter moved to approve the consent agenda as
printed. Commissioner Harbert seconded the motion, and tt
carried unanimously.
PRESENTATIONS: RECOGNITION OF SERVICES - RAYMOND MORA, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT:
Chairman Webster read the certificate into the record
recognizing Raymond Mora for his six years of service on the
Board of Adjustment. Mr. Mora was not present to accept said
plaque.
RECOGNITION OF SERVICES - MICHAEL THOMAS, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT:
Chairman Webster read the certificate into the record
recognizing Michael Thomas for his three years of service on the
Board of Adjustment. Mr. Thomas was not present to accept said
plaque.
RECOGNITION OF SERVICES - DOUG MELBY, UTILITIES COORDINATING
ADVISORY COMMITTEE: Chairman Webster read the certificate into
the record and presented it to Mr. Melby for his seven years of
service on the Utilities Coordinating Advisory Committee.
941428
PUBLIC INPUT: There was no public input.
WARRANTS: Don Warden, Director of Finance and Administration, presented
the following warrants for approval by the Board:
General Fund $ 156, 184.70
Payroll Fund $ 26, 003.50
Commissioner Baxter moved to approve the warrants as presented
by Mr. Warden. Commissioner Kirkmeyer seconded the motion,
which carried unanimously.
BIDS: PRESENT 1994 GRADER BLADES - ROAD AND BRIDGE DEPARTMENT: Mr.
Warden read the names of the vendors into the record and
indicated the bids would be considered for approval on
February 9, 1994.
APPROVE ARCHITECT AND ENGINEERING SERVICES - CENTENNIAL PLAZA:
Mr. Warden recommended approval of the low bid from Bley
Associates/Architects at 4.5 percent of the project cost.
Commissioner Kirkmeyer moved to approve said bid as recommended,
and Commissioner Hall seconded the motion which carried
unanimously.
APPROVE TRAFFIC PAINT - ROAD AND BRIDGE DEPARTMENT: Mr. Warden
stated the letter from Dave Becker, Assistant Director of the
Road and Bridge Department, recommended the low bid by item from
Sherwin Williams for yellow paint, glass beads, and naphtha
thinner, for a total amount of $52,248.75; and the low bid by
item from Centerline Industries for white paint and lacquer
thinner, for a total amount of $30,214.65, for a grand total of
$82, 463.40. Commissioner Baxter moved to approve said bid as
recommended, and Commissioner Harbert seconded the motion.
After further clarification, the motion carried unanimously.
APPROVE 1994 SHOT ROCK - ROAD AND BRIDGE DEPARTMENT: Mr. Warden
said the only bid received was from Colorado Lein Company, which
Mr. Becker recommended for approval. The price per ton using
the vendor's loader and trucks would be $14.60, and the price
per ton using the vendor's loader and the County's trucks would
be $7.65. Commissioner Kirkmeyer moved to approve said bid as
recommended, and Commissioner Harbert seconded the motion. Mr.
Becker confirmed for Commissioner Hall that the bid is in line
and a minimal amount of rock will be purchased. The motion then
carried unanimously.
BUSINESS:
NEW: CONSIDER INFORMATION SERVICES SECTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL:
Mr. Warden stated this section of the manual required revision
since SCT Corporation has been contracted for computer services.
He said the section has been reviewed by SCT, the Governance
Committee, and the Board. Users' suggestions have been
incorporated through the governance process. Commissioner
Kirkmeyer moved to approve said section, and Commissioner Hall
seconded the motion which carried unanimously.
CONSIDER RESOLUTION RE: LIST OF PERSONS WITH LABOR RELATIONS
AND/OR LEGAL BACKGROUNDS FOR WELD COUNTY GRIEVANCE BOARD: Mr.
Barker explained Section 2.c. of the Grievance Hearing Process
provides for the Board to appoint available members to the
Grievance Board. He indicated said persons must have labor
relations and/or legal backgrounds and stated the following
persons would be available: Don Hoff, Lynn Karowsky, Jacqueline
Johnson, and Thomas David. Commissioner Harbert moved to
approve said resolution, and Commissioner Kirkmeyer seconded the
motion which carried unanimously.
Minutes - January 26, 1994
Page 2
CONSIDER SALE OF TAX SALE CERTIFICATE TO QUALITY DOOR, INC. :
Mr. Barker indicated property was received in 1987 through Tax
Sale Certificate #f87-01742/88. The property is on railroad
right-of-way in or on the edge of Windsor and has been vacant
for seven or eight years. Mr. Barker explained that Mr. Warden
had requested him to set up a system to sell the property and
Quality Door, Inc. , was interested. He explained the County
would sell the Certificate, then the buyer would apply for the
Treasurer's Deed. Mr. Warden indicated the County has had the
opportunity to have the tax deed; however, there have been
interested parties intermittently for three years, including the
Town of Windsor, with Quality Door being the first interested
party to go through with acquiring said property. Mr. Barker
said the amount is $13, 105.45, which represents the total amount
due and payable on said Tax Sale Certificate through January 31,
1994, excluding the 1993 taxes for the property, which cannot be
included until they become delinquent in May. Debbie Bertsch,
Vice President of Quality Door, Inc. , said the building would be
used strictly for a warehouse. Commissioner Harbert moved to
approve said sale, and Commissioner Baxter seconded the motion
which carried unanimously.
CONSIDER EVIDENCE OF COVERAGE AND OWNER'S MANUAL SIGNATURE SHEET
WITH TAKECARE OF COLORADO, INC. , AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN:
Mr. Warden stated this document must be signed annually with the
renewal of health coverage. He reviewed the new rates, which
are $144.29 for employee only and $398.24 for family coverage,
and other changes in the new Plan 9T. Commissioner Webster
questioned the effect of the merger with another firm. Mr.
Warden said the merger had not been finalized; however, the
policy would remain the same after the merge is final. He also
indicated this is the third merger. Commissioner Hall moved to
approve said signature sheet and authorize the Chairman to sign.
The motion, seconded by Commissioner Kirkmeyer, carried
unanimously.
FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 88-G, IN MATTER OF REPEALING AND
RE-ENACTING ORDINANCE NOS. 88-D, 88-E, AND 88-F, REGULATING THE
RUNNING AT-LARGE OF DOGS; PROHIBITING LOUD, PERSISTENT, AND
HABITUAL NOISE BY DOGS; PROVIDING FOR SEIZURE, IMPOUNDING, AND
OTHER DISPOSITION THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR FINES AND PENALTIES
FOR VIOLATIONS: Mr. Barker stated the proposed amendments were
made at the request of the Board to provide for control and
necessary action concerning barking dogs. He explained the
conviction and penalty assessment amounts and Section 3.c. ,
which provides authority for enforcement to enter onto the
property if necessary after 72 hours for impoundment. Mr.
Warden confirmed for the record that the reading by tape had
been completed. Sheriff Ed Jordan indicated he had researched
the impact of this ordinance as directed in the work session in
November. He explained the program of servicing letters for the
first offense and indicated a response would still be necessary,
which would take additional time. Sheriff Jordan also stated
collars are available to help control barking dogs at a cost of
$100 each. He indicated Larimer County Humane Society's budget
is $150, 000 and a raise is being considered; Weld County's
budget is only $84,000, with $41,000 for housing dogs and the
remaining for 60 hours of officer time per week. He said calls
are backlogged for two to three days and recommended an
additional 20 hours per week minimum which would increase the
budget by $10,000. Sheriff Jordan encouraged prioritization of
animal control concerning barking or at-large dogs and stated
the backlog is causing problems with the CAD system. He
suggested advertisement of the existence of the ordinance if
passed, which would result in more compliance; however, it could
also result in more demand. Responding to questions from the
Board, Sheriff Jordan indicated legal action through court would
be the only other means of enforcement if the ordinance were not
passed. Discussion ensued concerning covenants in subdivisions
regarding barking dogs. Dick Branecki, Northmoor Acres
Minutes - January 26, 1994
Page 3
Subdivision, said Northmoor's covenants are 20 years old and it
would take 95 percent agreement to change them, which would be
impossible. He asked the Board to pass the revised form of
Ordinance 88-G so people would accept responsibility for their
animals and be considerate of others' peaceful enjoyment in
their own homes. Commissioner Harbert said she feels there is
no other recourse and stated she is in favor of passage.
Commissioner Hall questioned the difference between Sections 9
and 10 concerning the conviction fees and penalty assessment
fees. Mr. Barker explained the difference and said 50 to 75
percent will pay the penalty assessment rather than going to
court. He suggested changing the language in Section 4 by
replacing the words "picking up" with the word "impounding"; and
adding the following language in Section 5 after the words ". . .
having control of the dog": . . , or apprehended pursuant to
the provisions of Section 3.c. of this Ordinance, . . . . Mr.
Barker noted said changes should be made prior to publication
and the second reading. Commissioner Hall questioned the
options concerning the fourth conviction and stated he feels one
should not be put in jail for a barking dog. Mr. Barker said
there is no statute of limitations concerning the issue;
however, he indicated the court would probably not be inclined
toward imprisonment. Concerning Section 3.c. , Commissioner Hall
stated it is not right to take a barking dog away from the
owner's property without the owner being notified, if the dog is
not harming anyone. He stated concerns about Section 7
regarding the 72-hour policy. Commissioner Harbert agreed such
dogs should be protected from euthanization. In response to a
question from Chairman Webster, Sheriff Jordan indicated the
City of Greeley's ordinance is enforced by the Humane Society
and does use the 72-hour policy. Mr. Warden stated he believes
certain dogs would be held for a longer time period, depending
on each particular case. Cruelty to animals was discussed, and
Sheriff Jordan clarified that would not be the intent of the
barking dog ordinance. Commissioner Baxter stated there is a
need for the ordinance for legal purposes, and it would he
interpreted at the officer's discretion. Sheriff Jordan
reiterated the need for direction on prioritization concerning
the service level, which is now inadequate. In response to a
question from Commissioner Baxter, Sheriff Jordan indicated the
letters would solve the problem with cooperative individuals;
however, some cases will need legal action. Mr. Branecki stated
jurisdictions with similar ordinances have solved 85 percent of
their problem. He also agreed that it would not lessen the
effect of the ordinance to remove the impoundment clause.
Commissioner Kirkmeyer referenced Sections 3.c. and 7 and
questioned whether the Board would be willing to put additional
funds toward enforcement. In response to a question from
Commissioner Harbert, Sheriff Jordan said some barking dog
complaints are responded to now by regular patrol officers;
however, they are a low priority. He stated the need for all
responsibilities to be under the domain of animal control,
indicating it is not a good use of resources to use deputies.
Sheriff Jordan reiterated the need for additional resources
soon, especially with the barking dog ordinance. Responding to
a question from Chairman Webster, Sheriff Jordan stated the
majority of the calls are for dogs at-large and most cases are
settled prior to impoundment. Discussion ensued between
Commissioners Harbert and Kirkmeyer concerning the dollars spent
on nuisance conditions, and Commissioner Kirkmeyer reiterated
the Board has not committed funds to this ordinance. She also
stated it is not the Government's responsibility to make people
take care of their dogs and respect their neighbors. There was
further discussion concerning the impact on the Sheriff's Office
and the limited resources, with Sheriff Jordan reiterating that
the best mechanism would be under animal control. In response
to Commissioner Harbert, Mr. Barker confirmed Section 3.c. could
be deleted as well as any clauses referring to said section.
Commissioner Harbert moved to approve Ordinance No. 88-G on
first reading, with the deletion of Section 3.c. ; and the
Minutes - January 26, 1994
Page 4
suggested language change in Section 4 replacing the words
"picking up" with the word "impounding", as recommended by Mr.
Barker. Mr. Barker clarified the last line in Section 4
regarding Section 3.c. should also be deleted and the suggested
addition to Section 5 would not apply. Commissioner Harbert
consented to said clarification, and Commissioner Baxter
seconded the motion. He stated the Board should be aware of,
and be willing to provide, the additional funding resulting from
the impact of this ordinance. Discussion ensued concerning
extending the 72-hour period, and Commissioner Hall stated
further concerns regarding imprisonment for barking dogs,
stating that is improper punishment. In response to a question
from Chairman Webster, Mr. Barker reiterated the City's
ordinance does enforce that policy. Commissioner Hall stated
there should be distinction between at-large and barking dogs.
Mr. Barker suggested a more graduated fee schedule could be
provided; however, it would still be a Class II petty offense in
court. Sheriff Jordan confirmed, to his knowledge, no one had
ever been in jail for dogs, and it would be a remote
possibility. On a roll-call vote, the motion carried three to
two with Commissioners Kirkmeyer and Hall voting nay.
PLANNING: CONSIDER DELETION OF CONDITION OF APPROVAL #5 FROM RE #1556 -
ORR: Monica Daniels-Mika, Planning Department representative,
explained Condition of Approval #5 was added to RE #1556 in
error. She said RE #1551 was considered on the same day and
included the same conditions; however, Condition of Approval #5
does not apply to RE #1556. Commissioner Hall moved to delete
Condition of Approval #5 from RE #1556 for Clair Orr. The
motion, seconded by Commissioner Harbert, carried unanimously.
CONSIDER RE #1575 - SIDWELL: Ms. Daniels-Mika presented a
revised staff recommendation to the Board. The application
would divide 77 acres into two lots of 2 and 75 acres. She read
the unfavorable recommendation of the Planning staff into the
record and stated staff recommends utilizing the subdivision
exemption process rather than the recorded exemption process.
Ms. Daniels-Mika said staff also recommends the applicant
withdraw the recorded exemption application and proceed with the
subdivision exemption. She explained a house can be built on
the 77 acres; however, it is easier to finance a smaller lot.
She indicated, however, the request does not meet the intent of
a recorded exemption. Another concern of staff was that this is
the first request in the area to further divide a recorded
exemption property. She reiterated a subdivision exemption
would be the best alternative. At the request of Commissioner
Hall, Ms. Daniels-Mika clarified the request does not enhance or
contribute to agricultural production and reviewed the three
criteria satisfying the intent of a recorded exemption. She
reiterated the lot is buildable by right and the lack of
justification. Ms. Daniels-Mika said this recorded exemption
would divide proposed Lot A off RE #1035. Katherine Sidwell,
applicant stated the two acres are non-productive dryland,
because there is a pivot sprinkler on the property. She said
she purchased the property in December of 1992 and has been
unable to get funding. Ms. Sidwell indicated two different
bankers suggested a recorded exemption rather than a subdivision
exemption to better protect the bank. In response to
Commissioner Hall, Mr. Barker explained the minor differences
between the two processes and indicated the lot would be
sellable by the bank. Commissioner Harbert stated there are two
loans, one for the farm and one for the house. Chairman Webster
clarified, however, the bank would require signature as a
personal guarantee on each loan. In response to a question from
Commissioner Baxter, Ms. Daniels-Mika stated the subdivision
exemption process was created to handle cases requiring
financing. She explained when the financing is completed, the
subdivision exemption lot would be put back into the 77 acres.
In case of default however, the court could still create a Lot
Minutes - January 26, 1994
Page 5
to be sold, which would be the same result as a recorded
exemption. It was confirmed the larger lot would be buildable.
Commissioner Harbert suggested this matter be continued to allow
Mr. Barker to meet with the banker to explain the situation.
Ms. Sidwell indicated a continuance would not be necessary and
mentioned surrounding properties which have been granted
recorded exemptions. She also stated she bought the property to
farm and reroot in the area where she grew up. Mr. Barker
indicated the bank may be requesting a recorded exemption for
flexibility. Commissioner Baxter questioned whether the
applicant was willing to accept Planning staff's offer. Ms.
Daniels-Mika stated the applicant would like to divide the
property into two lots because of the banks' request. She
further explained the applicant would better benefit by
withdrawing the application rather than the recorded exemption
being denied, because a substantial change hearing would then be
required before proceeding with a subdivision exemption. Mr.
Barker clarified the duties of the Board and said he would be
willing to meet with the banker if necessary. Ms. Sidwell
reiterated she had spoken with two bankers who both indicated a
recorded exemption would be best. Commissioner Harbert stated
she would still like to continue the matter to allow Ms. Sidwell
to further investigate financing and she preferred the
subdivision exemption process be followed. Ms. Sidwell
reiterated she preferred the matter not be continued. Ms.
Daniels-Mika questioned, on behalf of the applicant, whether the
$825 for the recorded exemption could be reimbursed and paid
toward the $180 subdivision exemption. Commissioner Harbert
explained the reason the fees were charged are to pay for staff
time and research, which has already been completed; however,
she would be agreeable to waive the fee for the subdivision
exemption since the research had been completed. Commissioner
Baxter agreed and questioned the difference in the fee amount
for the two applications. Ms. Daniels-Mika indicated staff does
not set the fees; however, many more referrals are necessary for
recorded exemptions and there is a large difference in the
plats, with the subdivision exemption being much less involved.
Ms. Daniels-Mika and Ms. Sidwell confirmed for Commissioner
Baxter that the applicant was advised of the difference in fees
early in the process. Commissioner Kirkmeyer moved to continue
Recorded Exemption #1575 for Katherine A. Sidwell to February 9,
1994. Commissioner Harbert seconded the motion. (Changed to
Tape #94-07. ) Commissioner Kirkmeyer stated she felt it would
be inappropriate to include the fee waiver in the motion, but
she would agree with Commissioner Harbert's statement. Ms.
Daniels-Mika clarified the request regarding the fee was the
applicant's, and not staff's request. The motion carried four
to one, with Commissioner Hall voting nay.
RESOLUTIONS AND
ORDINANCES: The Resolutions were presented and signed as listed on the
consent agenda. Ordinance No. 88-G was approved on first
reading.
Let the minutes reflect that the above and foregoing actions
were attested to and respectfully submitted by the Acting Clerk
to the Board.
Minutes - January 26, 1994
Page 6
There being no further business, this meeting was adjourned at
10:50 a.m.
441/0,1duin APPROVED:
ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
WELD COUNTY,,{ / CDLORRAADO
Weld County Clerk to the Board /A_ 9' V 11/(17)))15771
W. H. Webster, Chairman
P
By: JUO k-Y1" P .- -mow'
Deputy C14 to the Board Dale K. Hall j //I
Geeoo ge�E. Baxter ��
ConstancALLe L. Harbert
,y.
/ r „ , ,,y,,,y, _,
/Barbara J. Kirkmeyer el
Minutes - January 26, 1994
Page 7
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
MINUTES
BOARD OF SOCIAL SERVICES
WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
JANUARY 26, 1994
TAPE #94-06
The Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, met
in regular session as the Board of Social Services in full
conformity with the law and bylaws of said Board at the regular
place of meeting in the Weld County Centennial Center, Greeley,
Colorado, January 26, 1994, at the hour of 9:00 A.M.
ROLL CALL: The meeting was called to order by the Chairman and on roll call
the following members were present, constituting a quorum of the
members thereof:
Commissioner W. H. Webster, Chairman
Commissioner Dale K. Hall, Pro-Tem
Commissioner George E. Baxter
Commissioner Constance L. Harbert
Commissioner Barbara J. Kirkmeyer
Also present:
Weld County Attorney, Bruce T. Barker
Acting Clerk to the Board, Shelly Miller
MINUTES: Commissioner Kirkmeyer moved to approve the minutes of the Board
of Social Services meeting of January 24, 1994, as printed.
Commissioner Harbert seconded the motion, and it carried
unanimously.
WARRANTS: Shelly Miller, Deputy Clerk to the Board, presented the warrants
for approval by the Board in the amount of $188,881.90.
Commissioner Kirkmeyer moved to approve the warrants as
presented by Ms. Miller. Commissioner Harbert seconded the
motion, which carried unanimously.
Let the minutes reflect that the above and foregoing actions
were attested to and respectfully submitted by the Acting Clerk
to the Board.
There being no further business, this meeting was adjourned at
10:55 a.m.
APPROVED:
ATTEST: LeAtin BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
Weld County Clerk to the Board
W. H. Webste Chairman
By: atil k- „ I Srt Zr �
Deputy Cl k to the Board Dale/K. Hall, Pr9rT m
4ffrgestrBaxter WL
Cop.stance L./Harbert
41(A-tic /A/al-4M
Barbara J. Kir eyer I
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
MINUTES
HOUSING AUTHORITY
WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
JANUARY 24, 1994
TAPE 1194-06
The Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, met
in regular session as the Housing Authority Board in full
conformity with the law and bylaws of said Board at the regular
place of meeting in the Weld County Centennial Center, Greeley,
Colorado, January 24, 1994, at the hour of 9:00 A.M.
ROLL CALL: The meeting was called to order by the Chairman and on roll call
the following members were present, constituting a quorum of the
members thereof:
Commissioner W. H. Webster, Chairman
Commissioner Dale K. Hall, Pro-Tem
Commissioner George E. Baxter
Commissioner Constance L. Harbert
Commissioner Barbara J. Kirkmeyer
Also present:
Weld County Attorney, Bruce Barker
Acting Clerk to the Board, Shelly Miller
Finance and Administration Director, Don Warden
MINUTES: Commissioner Kirkmeyer moved to approve the minutes of the
Housing Authority Board meeting of December 27, 1993, as
printed. Commissioner Hall seconded the motion, and it carried
unanimously.
NEW BUSINESS: CONSIDER HUD INNOVATIVE HOMELESS INITIATIVE DEMONSTRATION
APPLICATION AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN: Jim Sheehan,
Housing Authority representative, indicated he received
notification of availability of $25 million in funding for
homeless shelters; however, due to a very short time frame, the
application proposal was completed by the department rather than
the shelters themselves. He explained the need for transitional
housing and indicated $545, 000 would provide for 75 families for
two years. Case management and support services would be
provided by the shelters for a total request of $906,255. Mr.
Sheehan indicated the competition would be very stiff, but
possibly the application could be used as a model in the future.
Commissioner Harbert commended Mr. Sheehan and Judy Griego,
Director of Social Services, for the weekend they spent
compiling said application. She reiterated this is a good
start, even though chances are slim. Commissioner Hall moved to
approve said application and authorize the Chairman to sign.
The motion, seconded by Commissioner Kirkmeyer, carried
unanimously.
CONSIDER LOAN AGREEMENT WITH AUGSTINE AND JO ANN MAES AND
AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN: Mr. Sheehan said this is an
initiative to promote migrant housing in the private sector in
the County. He explained Mr. and Mrs. Maes bought an eight-unit
housing camp last summer and rehabilitated it. The agreement
would provide for a lease payment of $2, 000 to the property
owner, which would be paid back by September 30, 1994. Mr.
Barker explained the promissory note would be secured by a deed
of trust and suggested changing the word "project" to "building"
in said deed. Commissioner Harbert again commended Mr. Sheehan
and Ms. Griego for following through with this matter and moved
to approve said agreement, with the suggested change on the
deed, and authorize the Chairman to sign. The motion was
seconded by Commissioner Baxter, and it carried unanimously.
(e /In
Let the minutes reflect that the above and foregoing actions
were attested to and respectfully submitted by the Acting Clerk
to the Board.
There being no further business, this meeting was adjourned at
10:00 a.m.
APPROVED:
ATTEST: 4/4W kiwi BOAARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
t WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
Weld County Clerk to the Board 4 / /
/ W. H. Webster, C air
/ 7/
By: , / .1.49 ./r7-4- ck-2— - --(r
Deputy Clerk to the Board a e Hall, Pro e
�
/George �� . Baxter
Co stance L. Harbert
i
,!mil`Si -4u d- I . , /% 4-=
Barbara J. Kirkme er 0
Minutes - January 24, 1994
Page 2
Hello