The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About940508.tiff RESOLUTION RE: APPROVE SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT #1043 FOR STORAGE AND MAINTENANCE OF DELIVERY TRUCKS FOR AN AIR FREIGHT BUSINESS WITH LIMITED STORAGE, TRANSFER, LOADING, OR UNLOADING OF FREIGHT ON SITE - GREGORY B. AND KRISTIE KAY BEMENT WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners held a public hearing on the 1st day of June, 1994, at the hour of 10:00 a.m. in the Chambers of the Board for the purpose of hearing the application of Gregory B. and Kristie Kay Bement, 8402 Weld County Road 62, Windsor, Colorado 80550, for a Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit #1043 for storage and maintenance of delivery trucks for an air freight business with limited storage, transfer, loading, or unloading of freight on site on the following described real estate, to-wit: Part of the E; NW,' of Section 4, Township 5 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado WHEREAS, Greg Bement, said applicant, was present, and WHEREAS, Section 24.4.2 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance provides standards for review of said Special Review Permit, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners heard all of the testimony and statements of those present, studied the request of the applicant and the recommendations of the Weld County Planning Commission and all of the exhibits and evidence presented in this matter and, having been fully informed, finds that this request shall be approved for the following reasons: 1. The submitted materials are in compliance with the application requirements of Section 24.7 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 2. It is the opinion of the Board of County Commissioners that the applicant has shown compliance with Section 24.4.2 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: PL0957 940508 pLo957 c7e : Pe /EA/r SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT #1043 - BEMENT PAGE 2 a. The proposal is consistent with the Agricultural Goals and Policies and the Urban Growth Boundary Areas Goals and Policies of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. The proposed Special Use Permit area is not located on productive farm ground and is within the Urban Growth Boundary Area of the Town of Windsor and the City of Greeley. The Town of Windsor reviewed this request and indicated no objections. b. The proposal is consistent with the intent of the A (Agricultural) Zone District and is provided for as a Use by Special Review. c. The proposed use will be compatible with the existing surrounding land uses which include rural residences, dryland pasture, and agricultural production. This proposed use will be compatible with the future development of the surrounding area as permitted by the Agricultural Zone District. Conditions of Approval and Development Standards will ensure compatibility. d. No overlay districts affect the site. e. Special Review Permit Development Standards will provide adequate protection for the health, safety, and welfare of the neighborhood and County. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the application of Gregory B. and Kristie Kay Bement for a Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit #1043 for storage and maintenance of delivery trucks for an air freight business with limited storage, transfer, loading, or unloading of freight on site on the hereinabove described parcel of land be, and hereby is, granted subject to the following conditions: 1. The attached Development Standards for the Special Review Permit shall be adopted and placed on the Special Review plat prior to recording the plat. The plat shall be delivered to the Department of Planning Services and be ready for recording in the Weld County Clerk and Recorder's Office within 15 days of approval by the Board of County Commissioners. 2. The Special Review activity shall not occur nor shall any building or electrical permits be issued on the property until the Special Review plat is ready to be recorded in the office of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. 940508 SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT #1043 - BEMENT PAGE 3 The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 1st day of June, A.D. , 1994. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: 1,141/gdzar WELDDCOUNTY, LORADO Weld County Clerk to the Bord Z//t //R �'{—'- -b d-q, CI iweste , airman BY: K ThI-aOiu _ Deputy Cl k to the Board Dale . Hall, roc-/ em APPROVED AS TO FORM: Gee Baxter County Attor ey Con tance L. Harber / /L'uck,11<. x/ '7.1 cam,L Barbara J. Kirk yer 940508 SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS GREGORY B. AND KRISTIE KAY BEMENT USR #1043 1. The Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit is for storage and maintenance of delivery trucks for an air freight business with limited storage, transfer, loading, or unloading of freight on site in the A (Agricultural) Zone District as submitted in the application materials on file and subject to the Development Standards stated herein. 2. Approval of this plan may create a vested property right pursuant to Section 90 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 3. All liquid and solid wastes shall be stored and removed for final disposal in a manner that protects against surface and groundwater contamination. 4. No permanent disposal of wastes shall be permitted at this site. 5. Waste materials shall be handled, stored, and disposed of in a manner that controls fugitive dust, blowing debris, and other potential nuisance conditions. 6. Fugitive dust shall be controlled on this site. 7. The maximum permissible noise level shall not exceed the residential limit of 55 db(a) as measured according to 25-12-102, Colorado Revised Statutes. 8. Trees and bushes adjacent to the east and west of the entrance of this property shall be trimmed along Weld County Road 62 on a regular basis to ensure site distance for ingress and egress to the facility. 9. The Use by Special Review Permit shall not be transferable to any successors in interest to the described property and shall terminate automatically upon conveyance or lease of the property to others for operation of the facility. 10. No outside storage of materials or equipment associated with this operation shall be allowed on site. No more than one truck may be stored outside the building during daylight hours. 11. All construction on the property shall be in accordance with the requirements of the Weld County Building Code Ordinance. 12. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Design Standards of Section 24.5 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 940508 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - BEMENT PAGE 2 13. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Operation Standards of Section 24.6 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 14. Personnel from the Weld County Health Department and Weld County Department of Planning Services shall be granted access onto the property at any reasonable time in order to ensure the activities carried out on the property comply with the Development Standards stated herein and all applicable Weld County Regulations. 15. The Special Review area shall be limited to the plans shown herein and governed by the foregoing Standards and all applicable Weld County Regulations. Major changes from the plans or Development Standards as shown or stated shall require the approval of an amendment of the Permit by the Weld County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners before such changes from the plans or Development Standards are permitted. Any other changes shall be filed in the office of the Department of Planning Services. 16. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with all of the foregoing Development Standards. Noncompliance with any of the foregoing Development Standards may be reason for revocation of the Permit by the Board of County Commissioners. 940508 HEARING CERTIFICATION DOCKET NO. 94-42 RE: SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT FOR STORAGE AND MAINTENANCE OF DELIVERY TRUCKS FOR AN AIR FREIGHT BUSINESS WITH LIMITED STORAGE, TRANSFER, LOADING, OR UNLOADING OF FREIGHT ON SITE - GREGORY B. AND KRISTIE KAY BEMENT A public hearing was conducted on June 1, 1994, at 10:00 a.m. , with the following present: Commissioner W. H. Webster, Chairman Commissioner Dale K. Hall, Pro-Tem Commissioner George E. Baxter Commissioner Constance L. Harbert Commissioner Barbara J. Kirkmeyer Also present: Acting Clerk to the Board, Shelly Miller Assistant County Attorney, Lee Morrison Planning Department representative, Keith Schuett The following business was transacted: I hereby certify that pursuant to a notice dated May 11, 1994, and duly published May 19, 1994, in the Windsor Beacon, a public hearing was conducted to consider the request of Gregory B. and Kristie Kay Bement for a Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit for storage and maintenance of delivery trucks for an air freight business with limited storage, transfer, loading, or unloading of freight on site. Lee Morrison, Assistant County Attorney, made this a matter of record. Keith Schuett, Planning Department representative, entered the favorable recommendation of the Planning Commission into the record as written. In response to a question from Commissioner Kirkmeyer, Mr. Schuett stated Condition of Approval #3 and Development Standard #9 concern a culvert and indicated Greg Bement, applicant, would probably request removal of said Condition and Development Standard. Mr. Bement was present and stated he is a contractor for Airborne Express for the northern region. He explained a maximum of four or five delivery trucks and some freight would be stored on the site, and some transferring would take place on the site; however, no business would be conducted at the site, and there should not be much additional traffic. Mr. Bement said he has cleaned out the west end of the culvert which runs under the driveway on Weld County Road 62; however, he could not find the east end of the culvert. He indicated there is no runoff or water in the ditch. Mr. Bement stated restrooms will not be necessary because there will be only four or five employees on the site on Saturday mornings for approximately one hour and no customers will be at the site. In response to questions from the Board, Mr. Bement stated a maximum of twelve trucks per day would arrive and depart from the site. Mr. Schuett indicated the Engineering Department had reviewed this matter and the traffic counts and had no concerns. Mr. Bement stated most of the vehicles would be half or three-quarter ton vans, with one larger truck going in and out two to four times per day. He stated larger trucks already travel that road. In response to a question from Commissioner Hall, Mr. Schuett referenced a memo dated May 12, 1994, from Donald Carroll, Public Works Department, confirming the culvert could be removed. Mr. Bement reiterated there is no drainage problem, and the culvert could remain or be removed. No public testimony was offered concerning this matter. Mr. Schuett suggested Condition of Approval #3 and Development Standard #9 be removed and Development Standard #17 replace Development Standard #9. Commissioner Kirkmeyer moved to approve the request of Gregory B. and Kristie Kay Bement for a Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit for storage and maintenance of delivery trucks for an air freight business with limited storage, transfer, loading, or 940508 COG.' /CL RE: HEARING CERTIFICATION - BEMENT PAGE 2 unloading of freight on site, based on the recommendations of the Planning staff and the Planning Commission, with the Conditions of Approval and Development Standards as entered into the record and the elimination of Condition of Approval 113 and Development Standard #9, with Development Standard #17 to be renumbered to Development Standard #9. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Harbert, and it carried unanimously. This Certification was approved on the 6th day of June, 1994. gmilida44 APPROVED: ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD oUNTY, LO DO Weld County Clerk to the Board //l raja() By: ��4, YL� ;pniL) . H. Webster, C irman eputy Cl k to the Board F Dale Ha , Pro- TAPE 1194 25 //Ge( org Baxter DOCKET #94-42 Constance L. Harbert PL0957 / Barbara J. Kirk yer 940508 ATTENDANCE RECORD HEARINGS ARE AS FOLLOWS ON THIS 1st DAY OF June 1994: DOCKET #94-42 - Special Review Permit for Gregory B. and Kristie Kay Bement DOCKET #94-43 - Special Review Permit for Donald L. and Joann K. Harmon DOCKET # DOCKET 11 PLEASE write or print your name legibly, your address and the DOCKET U (as listed above) or the name of the applicant of the hearing you are attending. NAME ADDRESS HEARING ATTENDING 4 y za,,✓/,'r,. cam!h.51 Air / 7S --tid--/ a.., .ei 2 >ot0 1 >r oc q - 113 A xwnfa,9aeL -77,76 / 75:ii 4115 7 4,- V,3 Yjail an if Ainrene. al 1,% .2_ /7S``1.01Z- 5"474 - q , ZX t 7i5' 6 /754oQ Qy — /3 C- j 7l /7sue 9j - /3 5\.o,ca " C eN„, „.., .)'"lO \ W. \\c-, Av r SY- y'a 77'/ V-) 17S14‘) e III/- 43 it 4 9405^8 NOT I C E The Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, on June 1, 1994, conditionally approved a Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit for the property and purpose described below. Conditional approval of this plan creates a vested property right pursuant to Article 68 of Title 24, C.R.S. , as amended, for a period of three years. APPLICANT: Gregory B. and Kristie Kay Bement 8402 Weld County Road 62 Windsor, Colorado 80550 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the E; NWy' of Section 4, Township 5 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado TYPE AND INTENSITY OF APPROVED USE: Storage and maintenance of delivery trucks for an air freight business with limited storage, transfer, loading, or unloading of freight on site SIZE OF PARCEL: 2.3 acres, more or less Failure to abide by the terms and conditions of approval will result in a forfeiture of the vested property right. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO BY: DONALD D. WARDEN CLERK TO THE BOARD BY: SHELLY K. MILLER DEPUTY CLERK TO THE BOARD PUBLISHED: June 9, 1994, in the Windsor Beacon 9405^8 v. NOTIfF The Board of County AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Commissioners of Weld County,Colorado,on June 1, 1994, conditionally • STATE OF COLORADO approved a Site Specific Development Plan and I SS Special Review Permit for. COUNTY OF WELD the property and purpose described below. ' Conditional approval of this I, ROGER A. LIPKER, of said County of Weld, being duty plan creates a vested property right pursuant to sworn,say that I am publisher of .. Amge9BM it K C.R,5., die amNMad,Yr a period d Il mp_ WINDSOR BEACONAPPIJCNITOes aid a weekly newspaper having a general circulation in said KrIal Kst Bamwa�t'� , e4a e WPM County and State, published in the town of WINDSOR, in iWat t,c^� said County and State; and that the notice, of which the LEGAL DESCIBnION:Part annexed is a true copy, has been published in said weekly of the E1/2 NW1/4 of for J successive weeks, that the notice was Section 4, Township 5 Nonkflagera West al the published in the regular and entire issue of every number of 9th P.M., Weld County. the paper during the period and time of publication, and in Colorado the newspaper proper and not in a supplement, and that TYPE AND INTENSITY the first publication of said notice was in said paper bearing OF APPROVED tl7g date of the maintenance and /%y"{` maintenance for of deliveryday of �- , A.D., 19947and the trucks for an air freight business with limited last publicatio ring the date of the storage,transfer,loading,or _day of AD., 19_ and that unloading of freight an site the said WINDSOR BEACON has been published SIZE OF PARCEL:2,3 continuously and uninterruptedly for the period of 5 acres,more or less consecutive weeks, in said County and State, prior to the Failure to adds by the terms date of first publication of said notice, and the same is a and conditions of approval will result in a forfeiture of newspaper within the meaning of an Act to regulate printing the vested properly right. of legal notices and advertisements, approved May 18, I 1931,and all prior acts so far as in force. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, / t COLORADO 6 BY: DONALD D.WARDEN ' ISHER CLERK TO THE BOARD ..,,-1 BY: SHELLY K.MILLER Subscribed sworn to before me this 2714 4 day of DEPUTY CLERK TO 1 g 747'THE BONG ,�� --717.4...11.424,-, f7 Published Is fed Ji lit.. O/J ,/ ///.LATM s- Beaemr an as R IS 6bMfZ NOTARY PUBLIC My commission expires ,-e_fj 7-- r /9 9'to • 9405^8 NOTICE Pursuant to the zoning laws of the State of Colorado and the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, a public hearing will be held in the Chambers of the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, First Floor, Greeley, Colorado, at the time specified. All persons in any manner interested in the Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit are requested to attend and may be heard. Should the applicant or any interested party desire the presence of a court reporter to make a record of the proceedings, in addition to the taped record which will be kept during the hearing, the Clerk to the Board shall be advised in writing of such action at least five days prior to the hearing. The cost of engaging a court reporter shall be borne by the requesting party. BE IT ALSO KNOWN that the text and maps so certified by the Weld County Planning Commission may be examined in the office of the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners, located in the Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Third Floor, Greeley, Colorado. DOCKET NO: 94-42 APPLICANT Gregory B. and Kristie Kay Bement 8402 Weld County Road 62 Windsor, Colorado 80550 DATE: June 1, 1994 TIME: 10:00 a.m. REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit for storage and maintenance of delivery trucks for an air freight business with limited storage, transfer, loading, or unloading of freight on site LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the E? NW! of Section 4, Township 5 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: 8402 Weld County Road 62 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO BY: DONALD D. WARDEN WELD COUNTY CLERK TO THE BOARD BY: SHELLY K. MILLER DEPUTY CLERK TO THE BOARD DATED: May 11, 1994 PUBLISHED: May 19, 1994, in the Windsor Beacon 940528 LX 6/ w AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION SOMAS taheo121/2 N :Part STATE OF COLORADO d the ESC TION:Pa of Pursuant to Me Nig Ian 'Wren 4, Towne* d SS at the State d CNee an! IBS NAV 87 Wal dee the Weld County tInM9 a t, pin.,weld county, COUNTY OF WELD Ordinance,a public hearing Colorado will be held in the Chambers of the Board of County LOCATION: 8402 weld 1, ROGER A. LIPKER, of said County of Weld, being duly Commissioners of Weld County Road 82 sworn,say that I am publisher of County, Colorado, Weld County Centennial Center, BOARD OF COUNTY 915 10th Street,First Floor, COMMISSIONERS WINDSOR BEACON Greeley.Colorado,at the WELD COUNTY, Yrae spec18ed. All persons COLORADO In any manner interested in a weekly newspaper having a general circulation in said in. Specific BY:b NALD COUNT.WARDEN County and State, published in the town of WINDSOR, Development. Plan and WELD COUNTYCL9K in Special Review Permit are THE BOARD said County and State; and that the notice, of which the wpuesled to attend and may is a true be heard. BY:SHELLY K.MILLER annexed copy, has been published in said weekly. DEPUTY CLERK TO THE for / successive weeks, that the notice was Should the applicant or any BOARD published in the regular and entire issue of every number at Interested party desk,lie eg presence of a court repave DATED:May 11.1994 the paper during the period and time of publication, and in to make a record of the the newspaper proper and not in a supplement, and that proceedings.lo addition to pybiel-M In lie Sdeer, Se taped record which we amps en w I9,Iwo. � the first publication of said notice was in said paper bearing be kept during the hewing, the date of the 9e Clerk to the Board.tea LC IL be advised in wring of aim /. day of A.D., 19 and the salon at least five days pair last publication bearin date of the to be hearing. The cat of day 9 engaging a court reporter y A.D., 19_ and that shall be borne by the the said WINDSOR BEACON has been published "questing parry. continuously and uninterruptedly for the period of 5 SE IT ALSO KNOWN Bret consecutive weeks, in said County and State, prior to the the text and maps w eweled by the Weld Canny date of first publication of said notice, and the same is a Planning Commission may newspaper within the meaning of an Act to regulate printing M examined In the oboe of PaPO g P 9 Se Clerk to the Board of of legal notices and advertisements, approved May 18, County Commissioners, 1931,and all prior acts so far as in force. baled in the Weld County ///• Coelannial Center,915 10e /� `•� • 'beet,Third Floor,Greeley. Lf. , Colorado. (- - DOCKET NO: 94-42 ,PJJB SHER APPLICANT: Gregory B.and Kristin Kay Subscribed and sworn to before ne this ✓j°"�day of Bement NW Weld County Road fit PL-4-7 19674/ Windsor,Colorado 80550 't /f��, DATE:June 1.1994 /,(„p, 'J pl--Cent-r-nrC TIM:10:00 am. NOTARY PUBLIC INgk1EST:A Site Specific My commission expires 5L/ " / 9-9 F' edn 1a1 Rent Plan and �' at Review Permit for arw maintenance or air or 9105248 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Notice of Hearing, Docket 1194-42, was placed in the United States mail, first class mail, postage / ..,{prepaid, addressed to the following property owners. DATED this / day of / J�1 0. / , 1994. GREGORY B. AND KRISTIE KAY BEMENT 8402 WELD COUNTY ROAD 62 WINDSOR, CO 80550 ROBERT E. AND BETTY M. LINDSCHMIDT 8268 WELD COUNTY ROAD 62 WINDSOR, CO 80550 PAUL L. AND LORI A. STALEY 8476 WELD COUNTY ROAD 62 WINDSOR, CO 80550 ALBERT L. FRYE C/O MRS. RUBY M. FRYE 979 DOROTHEA ROAD LA HABRA HEIGHTS, CA 90631 TROLLCO, INC. P.O. BOX 1727 GREELEY, CO 80632-1727 Deputy Clerk tut the Board 94C538 ) MEMORAnDUM 1111111 Keith Schuett to Planning Dare Mav 12 , 1994 COLORADO From Donald Carroll 62,12% Subject Grezory B. and Kristie Kay Bement USR-1043 I was contacted by the applicant about the existing 15" plugged culvert I had made reference to in my prior memo dated April 5 , 1994. In talking with the applicant and reviewing the site entrance, we agreed upon removing the plugged culvert and not replacing it since the entrance is at the top of the hill. In talking to the neighbors in the area, it appears this borrow ditch was not carrying any water to require a culvert. cc: Commissioner Kirkmeyer File USR - 1043 . ^� , ) ri ntrn r:J C ,1 CD Z-i CD MAY 1219• 94 ?tanning 940598 a Ju -- THE SIGN SHALL BE POSTED ADJACENT TO AND VISIBLE FROM A PUBLICLY MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY. IN THE EVENT THE PROPERTY UNDER CONSIDERATION IS NOT ADJACENT TO A PUBLICLY MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, THE APPLICANT SHALL POST ONE SIGN IN THE MOST PROMINENT PLACE ON THE PROPERTY AND POST A SECOND SIGN AT THE POINT AT WHICH THE DRIVEWAY (ACCESS DRIVE) INTERSECTS A PUBLICLY MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SIGN POSTING CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER THE PENALTIES OF PERJURY THAT THE SIGN PROVIDED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES WAS POSTED ON THE PROPERTY AT LEAST 10 DAYS BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS HEARING FOR CASE #UJ/Z /©C/ 3 THE -GN WAS POSTED BY: - r I' f.' 07- NAME OF PERSON POSTING SIGN ..F- A E APPLICANT STATE OF COLORADO ) s s. 1j( . COUNTY OF WELD ) �� 19 � 7 SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO ME THIS YYY DAY OF SEAL + " a{• J E ‘C o c NOTARY PUBL -MQFCSRRISSION EXPIRES ) W L mac\ cq l C. LAST DAY TO POST SIGN IS : Z Z /1 J> , 19 99 . PLEASE RETURN THIS FORM TO THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES' OFFICE ON OR BEFORE THE DATE OF THE HEARING. Lk h a r f f{ 940508 THE SIGN SHALL BE POSTED ADJACENT TO AND VISIBLE FROM A PUBLICLY MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF- WAY. IN THE EVENT THE PROPERTY UNDER CONSIDERATION IS NOT ADJACENT TO A PUBLICLY MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, THE APPLICANT SHALL POST ONE SIGN IN THE MOST PROMINENT PLACE ON THE PROPERTY AND POST A SECOND SIGN AT THE POINT AT WHICH THE DRIVEWAY (ACCESS DRIVE) INTERSECTS A PUBLICLY MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY. PLANNING COMMISSION SIGN POSTING CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER THE PENALTIES OF PERJURY THAT THE SIGN PROVIDED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES WAS POSTED ON THE PROPERTY AT LEAST 10 DAYS BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING FOR CASE If (-15 /2 /2Y3 THE SIGN WAS POSTED BY: -4 - Cne/-D f .o. Bar/tit-;-r ye 7, c ' ' NAME OF PERSON POSTING SIGN " - ' �� i -H SI E APPLICANT STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. COUNTY OF WELD ) / SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO ME THIS I L l r DAY OF M , 19 .IX SEAL < F. •�' } ••. NO Y PUBLIC -�- �,� a�, «V-MY COM Z�Suotiod$ $ES �J / q LAST DAY s.)- 'SSD SIGN IS: , 1/L t7 / //9/� , 19 . PLEASE RETURN THIS FORM TO THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES' OFFICE ON OR BEFORE THE DATE OF THE HEARING. CX 11,Lb.C1- 67 94C5" ('c • & c, t mEmoRAnDu(AIM jai.. 1119€ To Keith Schuett, Planning lNay ;7ll9a4 V3d 2: 50 Dote COLORADO Jeff Stoll, Director, Environmental HealtWLE From TO Th_ USR-1043/ Greg Bement Subject: I spoke with Greg Bement on Friday, April 29, 1994 regarding the requirement for a septic system for his air freight business. He indicated that the only time that employees are on the site for any extended time is on Saturdays for a maximum of two hours. Four employees are engaged in sorting operations during this time. The employees have been using restroom facilities in the existing residence. The existing septic system (Permit G92160) is adequate for this incidental usage and meets the 200-foot proximity requirement for adequate septic facilities. The applicant has also indicated that this Saturday acitivity is temporary and is not expected to last more than one year. In addition, at the time of our initial review of the referral, I was not aware that the existing septic system was permitted under the previous owner's name, VonTersh. Based on this recent information, I am requesting that you remove the following conditions stated in my memo, dated April 6, 1994: 6. Any existing septic system(s) which is not currently permitted through the Weld County Health Department will require an I.S.D.S. Evaluation prior to the issuance of the required septic permit(s) . In the event the system(s) is found to be inadequate, the system(s) must be brought into compliance with current I.S.D.S. regulations. 8. An individual sewage disposal system, is required for the proposed facility and shall be installed according to the Weld County Individual Sewage Disposal Regulations. The septic system is required to be designed by a Colorado Registered Professional Engineer according to the Weld County Individual Sewage Disposal Regulations. 9. The existing septic system must be evaluated by a Colorado Registered Professional Engineer and a copy of that review submitted to this Division. In the event the system is found to be inadequate, it must be brought into compliance with current regulations. JLS/bement.js MAY O 4 1994 wow rearm Planning Cyi { f��f c (6) 94G51)8 cc . 8O( SUMMARY OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING May 3, 1994 A regular meeting of the Weld County Planning Commission was held May 3, 1994 in the County Commissioners' Hearing Room (Room #101) , Weld County Centennial Building, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado. The meeting was called to order by Vice-Chairperson Richard Kimmel at 1:33 p.m. Tapes Roll Call Richard Kimmel Present Bill O'Hare Present Shirley Camenisch Present - _^ Juliette Kroekel Present Bud Clemons Present r rn ' _ p Marie Koolstra Present %7 Ron Sommer Present i Tom Rulon Absent Absent c tV -C Judy Yamaguchi Also present: Keith A. Schuett, Current Planner II, Greg Thompson, Current Planner, Department of Planning Services; Lee Morrison, Assistant County Attorney; Becky Schoenfeld, Secretary. The summary of the last regular meeting of the Weld County Planning Commission held on April 19, 1994, was approved as read. Judy Yamaguchi arrived at 1:40. CASE NUMBER: USR-1043 APPLICANT: Gregory B. and Kristie Kay Bement ADDRESS: 8402 Weld County Road 62, Windsor, CO 80550 REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for storage and maintenance of delivery trucks for an air freight business with limited storage, transfer, loading, or unloading of freight on site in the A (Agricultural) zone district. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The E2 NW4 of Section 4, T5N, R67W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: 8402 Weld County Road 62 SIZE OF PARCEL: 2.3 acres, more or less cl(Lc 4 E,( bt PLANNING COMMISSION MEETINGS May 3, 1994 Page 2 Greg Bement, applicant, stated that he is a contractor for Air Borne Express. Mr. Bement stated that Air Borne Express contracts with five or six entities like himself. He stated that he stores 3 to 4 vans on the property. Mr. Bement does maintenance on this property in a shop that this 40 x 60. They do sort freight on the property on Saturday mornings for an hour to hour and a half. He stated the traffic is not a large concern. They make approximately 3 to 4 arrivals and departures and no accidents have occurred with his drivers. Bud Clemons asked what kind of storage facility is on the property. Mr. Bement stated there is a steel building 40 x 60 feet, three overhead doors on the south side, two doors are 16 feet wide and one door is 12 feet wide. Can store 4 vans and one of the medium duty truck at a time. Marie Koolstra asked Mr. Bement if he received a permit. Mr. Bement said he did apply for a permit but stated to our office that it was for personal use. He is in the process of changing the building to commercial use. Bill O'Hare asked what the average traffic to and from the site. Mr. Bement stated that a dozen or less was a high estimate. Judy Yamaguchi asked if Mr. Bement had any concerns about the staff comments. Mr. Bement stated that he talked to the Health Department about putting bathrooms in but they felt it was unnecessary. He also had concerns over Development Standard #9 that limited outdoor storage. He stated that one medium duty truck mus.t stay outside. The building is not large enough to store both medium duty trucks. The Chairperson asked if anyone in the audience would like to speak for or against the application. Laurie Staley, surrounding property owner, stated that her main concern is growth. She does not mind what is being proposed but does not want this to grow. Keith Schuett stated to the Planning Commission that Condition of Approval #3 regarding the bathroom facilities could be deleted. Discussion followed regarding Development Standard #9. Marie Koolstra asked who owns the vehicles. Mr. Bement stated the corporation he runs owns the vehicles. He stated there are 19 vehicles in the corporation and that each truck comes in once a month for maintenance. He feels this will decrease once Air Borne Express builds their new loading facility. 940518 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETINGS • May 3 , 1994 Page 3 Bud Clemons moved Case Number USR-1043 for a Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for storage and maintenance of delivery trucks for an air freight business with limited storage, transfer, loading, or unloading of freight on site in the A (Agricultural) zone district be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with the Planning Commission's recommendation for approval including the following amendments: Eliminate Condition of Approval #3, addition of Condition of Approval #3 to state: "The 15 inch culvert at the access to the property shall be cleaned to provide adequate drainage", addition of Development Standard #9 to state: "The 15 foot culvert at the access to the property from Weld County Road 62 shall be maintained to accommodate proper drainage", change to the existing Development Standard #9 to state: "No outside storage of materials or equipment associated with this operation shall be allowed on site. No more than one truck may be stored outside the building during daylight hours", and subsequent renumbering of the Development Standards. Motion seconded by Shirley Camenisch. The Chairperson asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Richard Kimmel - yes; Bill O'Hare - yes; Shirley Camenisch -yes; Juliette Kroekel - no; Bud Clemons - yes; Marie Koolstra - no; Ron Sommer -no; Judy Yamaguchi no. Motion denied. Juliette Kroekel: "I feel that we should hold the permit to the present property owner only instead of letting it continue on." Marie Koolstra: "I do not want the permit to pass on to another property owner." Ron Sommer: "Same reason, I believe it should not pass on to another property owner." Judy Yamaguchi: "I also agree that it needs to stay with the property owner and not move forward." Ron Sommer moved Case Number USR-1043 for a Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for storage and maintenance of delivery trucks for an air freight business with limited storage, transfer, loading, or unloading of freight on site in the A (Agricultural) zone district be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with the Planning Commission's recommendation for approval including the following amendments: Eliminate Condition of Approval #3, addition of Condition of Approval #3 to state: "The 15 inch culvert at the access to the property shall be cleaned to provide adequate drainage", addition of Development Standard #9 to state: "The 15 foot culvert at the access to the property from Weld County Road 62 shall be maintained to accommodate proper drainage", change to the existing Development Standard #9 to state: "No outside storage of • materials or equipment associated with this operation shall be allowed on site. No more than one truck may be stored outside the building during daylight hours", 940508 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETINGS May 3, 1994 Page 4 addition of Development Standard #17 that states: "The Special Review permit shall not be transferable to any successors in interest to the described property and shall terminate automatically upon conveyance or lease of the property to others for operation of the facility", and subsequent renumbering of the Development Standards. The Chairperson asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Richard Kimmel - yes; Bill O'Hare - yes; Shirley Camenisch - yes; Juliette Kroekel - yes; Bud Clemons - yes; Marie Koolstra - yes; Ron Sommer - yes; Judy Yamaguchi - yes. Motion carried unanimously. CASE NUMBER: USR-1044 APPLICANT: Donald L. and Joann K. Harmon ADDRESS: 2631 W. 175th Avenue, Erie, CO 80516-7902 REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for an Accessory Structure over 1500 square feet in an Agricultural Subdivision and a horse training facility. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 10, Ranch Eggs, Inc. , First Filing, Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: Approximately 1300 feet west of Weld County Road 7; south of and adjacent to the Community Ditch, and north of and adjacent to 175th Avenue. Mr. and Mrs. Harmon, applicants, stated they raise and train racing horses. They have been boarding their animals at another location and it would be less expensive to train their own horses on-site. They have approximately 10 acres. This indoor arena would be used in the winter to break the horses. The manure created on site would be used for their own property and any extra would be sold to farmers. There would not be much traffic; only the family members that are involved. Judy Yamaguchi asked if they would have roping events. Mrs. Harmon stated they decided not to have roping events. Marie Koolstra asked how big is the building. Mrs. Harmon stated 100 x 300. Judy Yamaguchi asked if this building was comparable to the buildings in the area. Greg Thompson stated that other buildings in this subdivision are under half this size. Discussion followed. Ron Sommer stated concerns over the fact that the recommendation does not prevent commercial use. Discussion followed. Mrs. Harmon stated that they enjoy raising horses and they are trying to save money by training the horses themselves and it is there own personal project. 940598 BEFORE THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Moved by Ron Sommer that the following resolution, eliminating of Conditions of Approval #3, addition of Condition of Approval #3, addition of Development Standard #9, and change to the existing Development Standard #9, the addition of Development Standard #17, and subsequent renumbering of the Development Standards introduced for passage by the Weld County Planning Commission. Be it resolved by the Weld County Planning Commission that the application for: CASE NUMBER: USR-1043 -a C APPLICANT: Gregory B. and Kristie Kay Bement -- 7727 „7 ADDRESS: 8402 Weld County Road 62, Windsor, CO 80550 ri y REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review�'�permiVfor`- storage and maintenance of delivery trucks for an air fight' business with limited storage, transfer, loading, or unloading of freight on site. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The E2 NW4 of Section 4, T5N, R67W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: 8402 Weld County Road 62 SIZE OF PARCEL: 2.3 acres, more or less be recommended favorably to the Board of County Commissioners for the following reasons: 1. The submitted materials are in compliance with the application requirements of Section 24.7 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 2. It is the opinion of the Planning Commission that the applicant has shown compliance with Section 24.3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: - The proposal is consistent with the Agricultural Goals and Policies and the Urban Growth Boundary Areas Goals and Policies of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. The proposed Special Use Permit area is not located on productive farm ground and is within the Urban Growth Boundary Area of the Town of Windsor and the City of Greeley. The Town of Windsor reviewed this request and indicated no objections to this request. - The proposal is consistent with the intent of the A (Agricultural) zone district and is provided for a Use by Special Review. (Kilt&11- 94,^.5^8 RESOLUTION, USR-1043 Gregory B. and Kristie Kay Bement Page 2 - The proposed use will be compatible with the existing surrounding land uses which include rural residences, dryland pasture, and agricultural production. This proposed use will be compatible with the future development of the surrounding area as permitted by the Agricultural zone district. Conditions of Approval and Development Standards will ensure compatibility. - No overlay districts affect the site. - Special Review Permit Development Standards will provide adequate protection for the health, safety, and welfare of the neighborhood and County. This recommendation is based, in part, upon a review of the application materials submitted by the applicant, other relevant information regarding the request, and responses from referral entities. The Planning Commission's recommendation for approval is conditional upon the following: 1. The attached Development Standards for the Special Review permit shall be adopted and placed on the Special Review plat prior to recording the plat. The plat shall be delivered to the Department of Planning Services and be ready for recording in the Weld County Clerk and Recorder's office within 15 days of approval by the Board of County Commissioners. 2. The Special Review activity shall not occur nor shall any building or electrical permits be issued on the property until the Special Review plat is ready to be recorded in the office of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. 3. Prior to recording the plat evidence shall be submitted to the Department of Planning Services: The 15 inch culvert at the access to the property shall be cleaned to provide adequate drainage. Motion seconded by Juliette Kroekel 940508 RESOLUTION, USR-1043 Gregory B. and Kristie Kay Bement Page 3 VOTE: For Passage Against Passage Richard Kimmel Bill O'Hare Shirley Camenisch Juliette Kroekel Bud Clemons Marie Koolstra Ron Sommer Judy Yamaguchi The Chairperson declared the resolution passed and ordered that a certified copy be forwarded with the file of this case to the Board of County Commissioners for further proceedings. CERTIFICATION OF COPY I, Becky Schoenfeld, Recording Secretary for the Weld County Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing resolution, is a truce copy of the resolution of the Planning Commission of Weld County, Colorado, adopted on May 3, 1994 Dated the 3rd of May, 1994 Becky Schoenfeld Secretary 940508 SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Gregory B. and Kristie Kay Bement USR-1043 1. The Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review permit is for storage and maintenance of delivery trucks for an air freight business with limited storage, transfer, loading, or unloading of freight on site in the A (Agricultural) zone district as submitted in the application materials on file in the Department of Planning Services and subject to the Development Standards stated hereon. 2. Approval of this plan may create a vested property right pursuant to Section 90 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 3. All liquid and solid wastes shall be stored and removed for final disposal in a manner that protects against surface and groundwater contamination. 4. No permanent disposal of wastes shall be permitted at this site. 5. Waste materials shall be handled, stored, and disposed of in a manner that controls fugitive dust, blowing debris, and other potential nuisance conditions. 6. Fugitive dust shall be controlled on this site. 7. The maximum permissible noise level shall not exceed the residential limit of 55 db(a) as measured according to 25-12-102, Colorado Revised Statutes. 8. Trees and bushes adjacent to the east and west of the entrance of this property shall be trimmed along Weld County Road 62 on a regular basis to ensure site distance for ingress and egress to the facility. 9. The 15 foot culvert at the access to the property from Weld County Road 62 shall be maintained to accommodate proper drainage. 10. No outside storage of materials or equipment associated with this operation shall be allowed on site. No more than one truck may be stored outside the building during daylight hours. 11. All construction on the property shall be in accordance with the requirements of the Weld County Building Code Ordinance. 12. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Design Standards of Section 24.5 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 13. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Operation Standards of Section 24.6 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 940598 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, USR-1043 Gregory B. and Kristie Kay Bement Page 2 14. Personnel from the Weld County Health Department and Weld County Department of Planning Services shall be granted access onto the property at any reasonable time in order to ensure the activities carried out on the property comply with the Development Standards stated hereon and all applicable Weld County Regulations. 15. The Special Review area shall be limited to the plans shown hereon and governed by the foregoing Standards and all applicable Weld County Regulations. Major changes from the plans or Development Standards as shown or stated shall require the approval of an amendment of the Permit by the Weld County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners before such changes from the plans or Development Standards are permitted. Any other changes shall be filed in the office of the Department of Planning Services. 16. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with all of the foregoing Development Standards. Noncompliance with any of the foregoing Development Standards may be reason for revocation of the Permit by the Board of County Commissioners. 17. The Use by Special Review permit shall not be transferable to any successors in interest to the described property and shall terminate automatically upon conveyance or lease of the property to others for operation of the facility. 9^!03^8 BEFORE THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Moved by Bud Clemons that the following resolution, elimination Condition of Approval #3, addition of Condition of Approval #3, addition of Development Standard #9, change to the existing Development Standard #9, and subsequent renumbering of the Development Standards introduced for passage by the Weld County Planning Commission. Be it resolved by the Weld County Planning Commission that the application for: CASE NUMBER: USR-1043 ` ? - i APPLICANT: Gregory B. and Kristie Kay Bement , n :Sri rn U C7 ADDRESS: 8402 Weld County Road 62, Windsor, CO 80550 • c -11 _� REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review termie for?-e storage and maintenance of delivery trucks for an air frtIght' business with limited storage, transfer, loading, or unloading of freight on site in the A (Agricultural) zone district. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The E2 NW4 of Section 4, T5N, R67W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: 8402 Weld County Road 62 SIZE OF PARCEL: 2.3 acres, more or less be recommended favorably to the Board of County Commissioners for the following reasons: 1. The submitted materials are in compliance with the application requirements of Section 24.7 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 2. It is the opinion of the Planning Commission that the applicant has shown compliance with Section 24.3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: - The proposal is consistent with the Agricultural Goals and Policies and the Urban Growth Boundary Areas Goals and Policies of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. The proposed Special Use Permit area is not located on productive farm ground and is within the Urban Growth Boundary Area of the Town of Windsor and the City of Greeley. The Town of Windsor reviewed this request and indicated no objections to this request. - The proposal is consistent with the intent of the A (Agricultural) zone district and is provided for a Use by Special Review. Cx h.ti bt.+ Q 94058 RESOLUTION, USR-1043 Gregory B. and Kristie Kay Bement Page 2 - The proposed use will be compatible with the existing surrounding land uses which include rural residences, dryland pasture, and agricultural production. This proposed use will be compatible with the future development of the surrounding area as permitted by the Agricultural zone district. Conditions of Approval and Development Standards will ensure compatibility. - No overlay districts affect the site. - Special Review Permit Development Standards will provide adequate protection for the health, safety, and welfare of the neighborhood and County. This recommendation is based, in part, upon a review of the application materials submitted by the applicant, other relevant information regarding the request, and responses from referral entities. The Planning Commission's recommendation for approval is conditional upon the following: 1. The attached Development Standards for the Special Review permit shall be adopted and placed on the Special Review plat prior to recording the plat. The plat shall be delivered to the Department of Planning Services and be ready for recording in the Weld County Clerk and Recorder's office within 15 days of approval by the Board of County Commissioners. 2. The Special Review activity shall not occur nor shall any building or electrical permits be issued on the property until the Special Review plat is ready to be recorded in the office of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. 3. Prior to recording the plat evidence shall be submitted to the Department of Planning Services: The 15 inch culvert at the access to the property shall be cleaned to provide adequate drainage. Motion seconded by Shirley Camenisch VOTE: For Passage Against Passage Richard Kimmel Juliette Kroekel Bill O'Hare Marie Koolstra Shirley Camenisch Ron Sommer Bud Clemons Judy Yamaguchi 940598 RESOLUTION, USR-1043 Gregory B. and Kristie Kay Bement Page 3 The Chairperson declared the resolution for approval was denied ordered that a certified copy be forwarded with the file of this case to the Board of County Commissioners for further proceedings. CERTIFICATION OF COPY I, Becky Schoenfeld, Recording Secretary for the Weld County Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing resolution, is a truce copy of the resolution of the Planning Commission of Weld County, Colorado, adopted on May 3, 1994 Dated the 3rd of May, 1994 k,G<-�-7 Becky Schoenfeld Secretary 940595 SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Gregory B. and Kristie Kay Bement USR-1043 1. The Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review permit is for storage and maintenance of delivery trucks for an air freight business with limited storage, transfer, loading, or unloading of freight on site in the A (Agricultural) zone district as submitted in the application materials on file in the Department of Planning Services and subject to the Development Standards stated hereon. 2. Approval of this plan may create a vested property right pursuant to Section 90 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 3. All liquid and solid wastes shall be stored and removed for final disposal in a manner that protects against surface and groundwater contamination. 4. No permanent disposal of wastes shall be permitted at this site. 5. Waste materials shall be handled, stored, and disposed of in a manner that controls fugitive dust, blowing debris, and other potential nuisance conditions. 6. Fugitive dust shall be controlled on this site. 7. The maximum permissible noise level shall not exceed the residential limit of 55 db(a) as measured according to 25-12-102, Colorado Revised Statutes. 8. Trees and bushes adjacent to the east and west of the entrance of this property shall be trimmed along Weld County Road 62 on a regular basis to ensure site distance for ingress and egress to the facility. 9. The 15 foot culvert at the access to the property from Weld County Road 62 shall be maintained to accommodate proper drainage. 10. No outside storage of materials or equipment associated with this operation shall be allowed on site. No more than one truck may be stored outside the building during daylight hours. 11. All construction on the property shall be in accordance with the requirements of the Weld County Building Code Ordinance. 12. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Design Standards of Section 24.5 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 13. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Operation Standards of Section 24.6 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 940508 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, USR-1043 Gregory B. and Kristie Kay Bement Page 2 14. Personnel from the Weld County Health Department and Weld County Department of Planning Services shall be granted access onto the property at any reasonable time in order to ensure the activities carried out on the property comply with the Development Standards stated hereon and all applicable Weld County Regulations. 15. The Special Review area shall be limited to the plans shown hereon and governed by the foregoing Standards and all applicable Weld County Regulations. Major changes from the plans or Development Standards as shown or stated shall require the approval of an amendment of the Permit by the Weld County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners before such changes from the plans or Development Standards are permitted. Any other changes shall be filed in the office of the Department of Planning Services. 16. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with all of the foregoing Development Standards. Noncompliance with any of the foregoing Development Standards may be reason for revocation of the Permit by the Board of County Commissioners. 940518 INVENTORY OF ITEMS SUBMITTED FOR CONSIDERATION Applicant: Gregory B. Bement and Kristie Kay Bement Case Number: USR-1043 Submitted or Prepared Prior to Hearing At Hearing 1. Application 16 pages X 2. 1 Application plat 1 page X 3. DPS referral summary sheet and letter X 4. DPS letter to applicant X 5. DPS Recommendation X 6. DPS Surrounding Property Owner/Mineral Owner Mailing list, letter and certificate. X 7. 3 DPS Maps Prepared by Planning Technician X 8. DPS Notice of Hearing X 9. DPS Case File Summary Sheet X 10. DPS Field Check X 11. Memo, dated April 15, 1994, from Don Carroll X 12. Memo, dated April 6, 1994, from Jeff Stoll X 13. Referral response, dated April 5, 1994, from Bob Winter, Windsor Fire Protection District X 14. Referral response, dated April 18, 1994, Janet Carpenter, Windsor X 15. Referral response, Ed Herring, Office of Emergency Management X 16. Referral response, March 30, 1994, Jeff Reif Weld County Building Inspection X 17. Letter, dated April 4, 1994, from Martin Lind X 18. Field Check, Ron Summer X 19. Letter dated April 25, 1994 from Paul and Lori Staley X 20. Letter dated April 28, 1994 from Melvin Martinez X 21. Memo dated May 2, 1994 from Jeff Stoll, Weld County Health Department X 22. Letter dated May 3, 1994, from Donald Lindauer X E-)( h,t btt A 940518 INVENTORY OF ITEMS, USR-1043 Gregory B. and Kristie Kay Bement Page 2 I hereby certify that the 26 items identified herein were submitted to the Department of Planning Services at or prior to the scheduled Planning Commission hearing. I further certify that these items were forwarded to the Clerk to the Board's office on 6, 19 uett, urr nt Planner II STATE OF COLORADO ) COUNTY OF WELD SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS day of 19 SEAL r : Aicl"• cd, ,••to •• • G. NOTA Y P U t I �� ahip. ComQirs�ton Expires ' qq5--, re or 940508 EXHIBIT INVENTORY CONTROL SHEET Case U " iO43 - &Aunt, � -Stoic-a- u Submitted By O Exhibit Description 54 A. PJoJniUJ11Atalk /� 14`(.U-['ihinc{, I D/�Inxi) . fhu t / /Cp B. �,ttvrinir)� rt7NYIlLA rrni bt ttr� �' Leinyt 57,1 c. RtA ruUrw) Cn w.m.u,w_L c l� ctle(i ti-ovO 015 fee r.rina urvirteit*r`. n _appne✓ea SiPARAWALitf4-'`"" , `Mt OW 0 Mlle iu.c.¢tt, uym qie F. deVIJ d�j /�E.` 0,700:c, yC ycttznd ('S-:3/gf4) 516 G. dgfihrittrit t (le ) ,5` H i) // /1 /r (60cc) 5 . r� � U 61/ I. apt yob gi 199 10 Adtatil J. K. L. M. N. 0. P. Q. R. S. T. U. V. W. X. Y. Z. 940588 USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW APPLICATION IU µp ar S � v Department of Planning Services, 1400 N. 17th Avenue, Greeley, ) 1j/04108;60194 Phone - 353-3845 - Ext. 3540 v_ta n,,. "di,planning Case Number U.mp/04/3 Date Received -2 - 2S——l,-/ Application Checked By I-t Mylar Plat Submitted 1 Application Fee Receipt Number 11`` � Recording Fee Receipt Number TO BF COMPLETED BY APPLICANT: (please print or type, except for necessary signature) I (we) , the undersigned, hereby request a hearing before the Weld County Planning Commission and Weld County Board of County Commissioners concerning the proposed Use by Special Review Permit on the following described unincorporated area of Weld County, Colorado: LEGAL_DESCRIPTION OF SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT AREA: ('/2 Ma/y C, Section T 6 N, R G7 W LEGAL DESCRIPTION of contiguous property owned which Special Review Permit is proposed: Section T N, R W Property Address (if available) $ vb z at--R 42 G1✓.twaci2. t!1 7D570 PRESENT ZONE 47. "2.X'CL'Ci"!/2E OVERLAY ZONES NOAte TOTAL ACREAGE .2i3 PROPOSED LAND USE vehtrC LE" 5r1Dn46-r / A 'f✓nfw4wCF EXISTING LAND USE LieWeLt SFV/4,E V emet ivTE/Ve*V€E SURFACE FEE (PROPERTY OWNERS) OF AREA PROPOSED FOR THE USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT: Name: Ls /2ekD/Li U '- 6E-Afewr Cf kaarsrrr I(.4 ' Lje/kE/✓r Address: P/O2 use'/! 62 City: g'rAhasore Zip: IO.SW Home Telephone: S76 `STY 3 Business Telephone: 222 —tff62. Name: Address: City: Zip: Home Telephone: Business Telephone: APPLICANT OR AUTHORIZED AGENT (if different than above) : Name: Address: City: Zip: Home Telephone: Business Telephone: List the owner(s) and/or lessees of mineral rights on or under the subject properties of record. # Name: SEE /46-E' 4 .7/2--AI /.3 11F i-154ell 0 Address: City: Zip: Name: Address: City: Zip: - I hereby depose and state under the penalties of perjury that all statements, proposals and/or plans submitted with or contained within the application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. COUNTY OF Weld ) STATE OF COLORADO 1 - n(ddd,n4re: Owner or Authorized Agent Subscribes and sworn to before me this day of 1991 // MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 10-26-970TARY LIC My commission expires S. Parish Ave Jnhnstnwn PEI 2534 4d 4. 'T 9405?s I —1--- page 1 II -- DESCRIPTION OF OPERATION AND USE 1 - Proposed use -- storage and maintenance of delivery trucks. Freight is not stored, transferred, loaded or unloaded on site in large quantities. The vast majority of that kind of thing is done elsewhere. One exception is Saturday morning when four or five drivers are on site for about 1 1/2 hours to sort through a truckload, separate the Saturday deliveries, and start their delivery routes. 2 - Need for use -- The two-fold need for use is primarily economic. The profit margin of the business does not provide the owner with sufficient resources to maintain both a place of business and a residence at separate locations. If both cannot be maintained on the same property, the business will be forced to close. This would result in 1) the loss of jobs for 17 people -- 5 in Weld County, and 2) the disruption in air freight pick-up and delivery service for approximately 75 companies in Weld County as well as hundreds in the Fort Collins, Loveland, Cheyenne, and Laramie areas. 3 - Uses on surrounding properties -- primarily agriculture. The property across CR 62 to the north is farmed -- sugar beets in the summer of 93 . There is no residence there. The property to the west has a residence and the acreage appears to be used to graze horses for personal use. The property to the east has a residence and the owners have hogs, chickens, horses, etc. 4 - There are no structures to the north. There is a residence with out-buildings located approximately 30O yards SW, and another residence and out-buildings about 300 yards to the east. 5 - There are no users, patrons, members, or buyers. This is not a place where business is transacted. Customers are not even aware of its existence. The main purpose is storage, and maintenance of trucks as explained in item #1. 6 - There are 17 people employed by the business. None of them work on site regularly. Very few work on site at all . The maximum number of employees on site at one time is 5. This occurs once a week on Saturday mornings for 940508 page 2 about 1 1/2 to two hours . There are no scheduled shifts on site. There are no specific hours of operation on site. The first truck generally leaves the yard at about 0400 Monday thru Friday, and sometimes on Saturday. The last truck returns at about 2130 Monday thru Friday, and 1600 on Saturday. 7 - A water source is not needed for the operation. Future plans include a restroom in the shop for convenience. If the proper permits can be acquired, the water source will be an underground cistern. If the proper permits cannot be acquired, the restroom will have to wait for the availability of public water. The water source for the residence is an underground cistern, which is properly permitted. 8 - Access to the property is from CR 62 about . 4 miles east of CR 17. 9 - The business operates sixteen 1/2 and 3/4 ton vans and two medium duty straight trucks. When not in use the vehicles are kept at the drivers residences. The vans weigh about 2 1/2 tons empty, and have GVWs of about 3 1/2 tons. The two straight trucks have empty weights of 9,500 and 17 , 000 lbs. and GVWs of 15,500 and 55 ,000 lbs. As mentioned above, the first truck leaves the yard at about 0400 Monday thru Friday and some Saturdays. The last truck returns at about 2130 Monday thru Friday and 1800 Saturday. Between 0700 and 1900 individual trucks arrive and depart at most a dozen times per day Monday thru Friday, and less on Saturday. Operations on Sunday are almost nonexistent. Other arrivals and departures associated with the residence occur. The number of business vehicles on site at one time (when not in use) is generally four or five -- two straight trucks and two or three vans. The exception to this is Saturday morning when an additional four or five vehicles are on site for about one 1/2 to two hours. Other vehicles stored on site are a personal car, a recreational boat, an eighteen foot flatbed trailer, and a water truck. There is a 40' X 60' shop on the site in which most of the vehicles are parked while there. 10 - No sewage is required for the operation. If, as mentioned in item #7 above, a restroom is installed in the shop for convenience, application will be made for the proper permits for a septic tank. The residence uses a septic tank which is properly permitted. 940508 page 3 11 - The shop is a steel building, which minimizes the fire hazard. Fire extinguishers are conveniently located inside. The closest fire station is in Windsor about three and 1/2 miles away. 12 - No animals are involved. 13 - Waste is stored in a dumpster outside the SW corner of the shop on a concrete pad. The waste is primarily paper products, small amounts of construction debris, and normal household waste. No hazardous waste other than automotive lubricants are generated. Waste automotive lubricants are stored short term inside the shop in five and fifteen gallon containers. Long term storage of the waste automotive lubricant is outside in a 500 gallon storage container. The container is located in a containment pit with a capacity exceeding 1000 gallons. The pit is lined with three layers of 8 mil plastic which is covered with clay. The tank is pumped out as needed about every two years. 14 - There is no storm water retention needed on site. The site is located at the top of a hill . There is no significant run off. 15 - A trash truck comes once a week to empty the outside dumpster. When 50 to 60 gallons of automotive lubricants are accumulated in the cans in the shop they are emptied into the outside tank. 16 - Three rows of seedling bushes and trees (chokecherry, cedar, and ash) have been planted along the entire west edge of the property. Two rows of full grown Russian olives and cedars already exist along the north edge of the property. The purposes of the landscaping are privacy and wind erosion prevention. 17 - Reclamation procedures would be unnecessary for two reasons. 1) The proposed use is perpetual , and 2) If the business were closed no reclamation would be needed. Other than the shop, the residence, and the landscaping there is no impact on the property. Future owners would probably want to keep the residence and shop intact. 18 - There is no timetable for construction and start up. Although not completely finished, the shop already exists. The business has operated since Dec 1985. Operations on 940508 page 4 this site started in Sep 1992 . The operator of the business was unaware of the need for a special use permit. III -- WRITTEN STATEMENTS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS 1 - Having read the Weld County Comprehensive Plan, paying special attention to the Agriculture, Farmland, and Environmental information, it is the opinion of the applicant that the proposed operation is consistent with the Plan, and will have no significant effect on agriculture or the ecology for the following reasons. -- There is no loss of productive farmland. The property is small - 2 . 3 acres. It does not appear to ever have been used as farmland, and probably never would have been because of topography, poor soil , and lack of water. A possible agricultural use might have been grazing, but it does not seem to be particularly well suited for that. -- The property is located within the Weld County Urban Growth Boundary. -- There is no significant impact to traffic on the adjacent county road -- a dozen or fewer arrivals or departures per day associated with the business. -- There will be no contamination of the soil, air, or ground water. There is no ground water. With one exception, the neighbors use underground cisterns for residential water sources. -- No wildlife is displaced. Not even prairie dogs were displaced for the construction of the house and shop. -- The business employs Weld County residents, provides services to Weld County businesses and individuals, and purchases goods and services from Weld County suppliers. 2 - Having read Section 30 (Zone Districts) of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, and considering in particular items 31 . 4 . 12 , 15, 16, and 20, it is the opinion of the applicant that the proposed use is consistent with the intent of the district. 3 - The proposed use has no affect on surrounding agricultural land. 940505 page 5 4 - The operation does not effect the health, welfare, or safety of the inhabitants of the neighborhood or the county. 5 - The operation has no affect on existing surrounding land uses. 6 - The proposed use is compatible with future development of the surrounding area for the reasons listed in items 1 and 2 of this section. 7 - The property is not located in the Airport, Geologic Hazard, Flood Hazard, or Planned Unit Development Overlay Districts. 8 - No water supply is currently needed. As mentioned in the above section, if a restroom is installed in the shop, a permit will be secured for an underground cistern. 9 - Warranty Deed is attached. 10 - Noise report has been waived by Greg Thompson at the Department of Planning Services. The only noise generated by the operation is from automotive engines and an air compressor. 11 - When contacted for the preparation of this application, the Soils Conservation Service reported no moderate or severe limitations for the proposed use. The soil is clay-loam. They indicated they would submit a soils report when notified by the county that this application was under consideration. According to the attached soils map the soil is primarily #34 . A description of that soil type is also attached. Also see USR vicinity map. 12 - List of surrounding property owners is attached. Also see USR vicinity map. 13 - Certified list of mineral rights may be unattainable. Upon learning of the requirement for a list of mineral rights owners the applicant contacted the planning and assessor offices in Weld county. People in both offices indicated they would be unable to help gathering that information. Nina Rutt at Stewart Title - 916 10th st Greeley, 352-4571 was then contacted in early January. She was at first reluctant to help because of the complicated nature of the task, but then agreed. She has 940508 page 6 called on experts within and outside of her company to help track down the information. At this time we believe the most recent owners of mineral rights on the property to be Lee and Rosemary Hicks (1/4) , Reuben R & Lynda Mohrlang (1/4) , Edwin Solomon (1/4) , and Harry Solomon (1/4) . No addresses are available for any of the above. Harry Solomon died in the early 1980s, and left no will or any instructions regarding his intentions concerning his estate. Probate has no information on him. Previous owners may have been Frank C & Loretta J Carlin (1/4) , Harold P Stewart (1/2) , and Clyde L Davis (1/4) . Nina Rutt and Stewart title are unwilling to certify to the above information because of many uncertainties. They have turned it over to their Attorneys for proper verbiage and approval . They may or may not be able to certify portions of the above information in the future. 940508 < y `t,4 ., 411- rqu I I U. 1 r 1/yfr,/ t: u0 I/0 )1 i $ �^ yt �� a 'A° p € 1 Ali te2`14 a65 I r, , I i+li ' ii „ I IJ,I.te I „I,. { 1 1 1,1 b PI ('('I I !.I'. Pr r.l,U i1), I'ii gg •t D i" t �'k- ' ' < `Wafiarity`Deed L : fin K Y � t J VYI s a cry THIS DEED is a conveyance of me real properly described below, including any improvements and other appurtenances (the �y! properly )from the Indv d lade) corporal on(e) cart erepp(s` or other antity(loe)named below as GRANTOR to the individual(3) Ire yv frypl 1T ! k}'°j Itt or onITy(es)named below as GRANTEE. t stl 4 I Fr,ry` J 61? The GRANTOR hereby sells and conveys the property la the GRANTEE and the GRANTOR warrants the'file to the property,except $ A e t';‘'7a , for (I)the lien of the general property taxes for the year of this dared,which the GRANTEE will pay (2)any'some its and rights of. 1: 7Y Ow 1 y way shown of record (3)an/patent reservations and exceptions (•Renyoutstanding mineral Interests shown of recor I (5)any protec. rk,.'I} t 7;aye t,' D.F. live covenants and resldelions shown of record (8)any additional matters shown below tinder"Additional Warranty E xceptbns',end lie d �.'Ys a ! $1.87 (11 silliest to building and zoning regulations. n `, y "T Y. Iy siSt%v a� The Specific Terms of This Deed Are: , Grantor: (Give nemets)and place(*)of residence.II lee spouse of the owner grantor Is fairing in this Deed to release honest rid rights star ply ) I �+ }�li {£{;} f135 f granters husband and wile) 3ya Vi 5 t, �r It I. TIMOTHY VON TERSCH y r: ia '!` yc r ‘f:„§:14440:0* 1 Grantee: Give nemNsl and.ddreo(eq:sfuement of address,Including'sellable road or street number,is legume) �J 1f'« GREGORY B. BEMENT AND KRISTIE KAY BEMENT 1 —` ?yte. .1 8402 WCR 42 WINDSOR COLORADO 80550{ 3Yt i {! n r F Form of OP-Ownership: Of there ere two a more grantees named,they will be considered to lake as tenants In common unless the words"in {I { I t..,,,r;)„."1064%, > joint tenancy"or words •I the earn*meaning are added in the space below.) dl$ ` Fv JOINT TENANTS E ,. ' t '"4" Property Description: (Include county and note.) t ri LOT "A" of Recorded Exemption No. 0957-4-2-RE781, as per the map recorded F 5 ' g NOVEMBER 5, 1985 in BOOK 1090 at RECEPTION NO. 2031108, being a part of the s •rvx Fn„ E1/2 of the NW1/4 of Section 4, Township 5 North, Range 67 West of the 6th ^° ly 3 P.M., Weld County, Colorado. fib teed �'r $ �R STATE DOCUMENTARY FEE IT'`,:,4;---111?-14,, T Dale f a s,, ea Property Address: WCR 62 WINDSOR CO 80550 $ �� " a *f y Consideration: (TM statement ofe dollar amount lsoplbnal,adequate consideration lwthis bed wag be presumed urdees this conveyance Y Idea- 1 F'iaf tilled M e gift. In any case lids conveyance le absolute,MP and unconditional.) r :y' `ii "'S. E 44 EIGHTEEN THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED AND 00/100 a '1 T Reservation-Reetdctlone: ill the GRAIITOR intends so reaense any Interns In the prepedy or to convey Ina ten he corn,a If to GRANTOR 9 � ! e le restricting the GRANTEE'S high In the properly.men epgeop4b hdkadon.) t' 41 tl^ - I x Additional Wemnry Exceptions: (Include deeds of trust being assumed and other matters not covered above) t y AI 1 R � f w 1 gl u$ ` ' Executed by Grantor on JULY 1, 1992 q: ,,,- . 4p4,,,,,,,., agMture for Corporation.Partnership or AeeoefatIon: {P • #` 'Ito Name of Grantor:Corporation,Partnership or Association Grantor M • I Kl t 4 ry,4 aYP. < „ t 1 Sy Grantor x >-I ff, q By 3 ��,,y ql Grantor Y $ Ix k t Attest. !� t g'I „j( coil COUNTY OF or WELD WELD lea. ,, iT iyt The foregoing IrRt erne;w Mh before me ode ia[ ,/dew Of JULY 1992 y .,',-.5,..:"k f�i e • Br TIHe7X1try -TdRSCI 7 g • t 9 ,• 3 z (` rs 1' wiTNege y: ( �,n I Z )(IN a 1i'+ W earpAsrsra: AUGUST 25, 1995 Newry pubes � x dy, „£.. ,� STAYS OP ' lee. 1221 8TH AVE., GREELEY, CO. ^ y P y�e H CW�y/Ty t III I C;'', 1 I > W @. The**PI IetVW5ehl as acknowled T , e . _ (II Wd before me this day of y Ll. I'MrM NavY/JU(wantons)or it grantor is Corporation,Pagmagship or AMtalalagn,then Identity sigma as pMklenl en vim posher and secretary or seeleeWe savagery of coipo,wart,es as pallrodq of panneeanip,or as authorised membet(s)01 se.ocietba_) Y x 4 ''''-t.''-',, a -y WITNESS my hand and orocw seal , My cemstselen amebas: Mealy Nate T 'Wit UPDATE l filet FORMS __ r(is I t I SOIL SURVEY WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, SOU'] ty is land wildlife, for example, the pronghorn antelope, can be t` can be drilled into a firm prepared seedbed. Plowing and Perme nore. attra d by developing livestock watering facilitie A ' drilling on the contour minimize runoff and soil losses. moderat xl is managin ivestock grazing, and reseeding where n d. This soil good Seeding early in spring has proven most successful. below t g potential for urban and • resurve l Windbreaks and environmental plantings are generally hazard i ionly development. In ased population grow in the survey well suited to this soil. Cultivation to control competing This 1 close area has resulted in ' reared hom e construction. The vegetation should be continued for as many years as Croppin F the chief limiting soil feature r u n development and road possible following planting. Trees that are best suited and tolerant n ir- construction is the limite city of this soil to support have good survival are Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern furrow: hour a load. Septic tank ab lion fie function properly, but row community sew' systems should provided if the redcedar, ponderosa pine, Siberian elm, Russian-olive, andPasture til- hackberry. The shrubs best suited are skunkbush sumac, Comme population d ity increases. Because of ermeability lilac, Siberian peashrub, and American plum. con- of the stratum, sewage lagoons must e sealed. Wildlife is an important secondary use of this soil. The forage rops Law , shrubs, and trees grow well. Capability subclass cropland areas provide favorable habitat for ring-necked T e II • 'rrigated, IVe nonirrigated; Loamy Plains range site. pheasant and mourning dove. Many nongame species can domina -eat, d to 34 Kim loam, 5 to 9 percent slopes. Phis is a deep, be attracted by establishing areas for nesting and escape an w ;he's ell :rained soil on plains and alluvial fans at elevations cover. For heasants, undisturbed nesting cover is essen- prairie tial and should be included in plans for habitat develop- grass, ears o ,900- to 5,250 feet. It formed in mixed eolian deposits ment, especially in areas of intensive agriculture. Range- tion ra m is and parent sediment from a wide variety of bedrock. In- land wildlife, for example, the pronghorn antelope, can be to 3,Of eluded in mapping are small areas of soils that have develo in livestock watering facilities, deterii i til- loamy sand underlying material. attracted by P g ;ion. Typically the surface layer is brown and pale brown managing livestock grazing, and reseeding where needed. little I i. loam about 10 inches thick. The upper 25 inches of the un- This soil has good potential for urban and recreational grass, development. Increased population growth in the survey crease blue derlying material is pale brown loam. The lower part to a rass depth of 60 inches is pale brown fine sandy loam. range chief limiting soil feature for urban development and road area has resulted in increased homesite construction. The Mal duc- Permeability is moderate. Available water capacity e, construction is the limited capacity of this soil to support on tal tion Surface runoff is rapid, and the erosion hazard is ears high. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. a load. Septic tank absorption fields function properly, but tion. buf- moderate. co mmunity sewage systems he ided if wh a population density increases ste . Bs beef theprov permeabilitythe are; This soil is suited to limited cropping. Intensive of the substratum, sewage lagoons must be sealed. media an- cropping is hazardous because of erosion. The cropping Lawns, shrubs, and trees grow well. Capability subclass select T. system should be limited to such close grown crops as a]- IVe irrigated, Vie nonirrigated; Loamy Plains range site. livest esed falfa, wheat, and barley. This soil also is suited to ir- 35—Loup-Boel loamy sands, 0 to 3 percent slopes. ubl Mc- rigated pasture. A suitable cropping system is 3 to 4 dl ion. years of alfalfa followed by 2 years of corn and small Thi level to nearly level map unit is on stream bottoms see glue grain and alfalfa seeded with a nurse cro and i drainageways of the sandhills at elevations of 4, ful. are Close grown crops can be irrigated from closely spaced to 4,7 feet. The Loup soil occupies the lower or d res- Sa36 nd sional ar s, which receive additional runoff. It es up the contour ditches or sprinklers. Contour furrows or ns of about 55 p rcent of the unit. The Boel soil o pies the This into klers should be used for new crops. Applications of .o a nitrogen and phosphorus help in maintaining slightly high elevations. It makes up abo 35 percent up a: has tion. good produc- of the unit. Ab t 10 percent of the unit ' Osgood sand and and Valent sand. The potential native vegetation is dominated by blue and oorly fined. It formed in Ren and grama. Sideoats grama, little bluestem, western wheat- The Loup soil is Typica the surf• e layer is very dark way yell grass, and sedge are also prominent. Potential production sandy alluvium. ing ranges from 1,800 pounds per acre in favorable years to grayish brown, mottled 1 my sa about 16 incheist light hick. 35T as 1,500 pounds in unfavorable The upper 24 inches of th derlying part years. As range condition brownish gray, mottled loa and. The lower sandy lays Ind deteriorates, the sideoats grama and little bluestem depth of 60 inches is ligh row sh gr•y, and ern decrease; forage production drops; and blue grama, buf- and falograss, and several perennial forbs and shrubs in- loam. i Permeability is r id. Available water capacity is incl lac, crease. Undesirable weeds and annuals invade the site as moderate. The wat table is at or n r the surface in inci range condition becomes poorer. The 'he Management of vegetation should be based on taking spring and about ' G inches below the su ace in the fall. F Surface runoff' slow, and the erosion haza is low. ced half and leaving half of the total annual production. Seed- The Boel s is deep and somewhat poorl drained. It not :an gra is desirable if the range is in poor condition. Sideoats formed in s atified sandy alluvium. Typically t e surface tpe grama, little bluestem, western wheatgrass, and pu- layer is yish brown loamy sand about 14 inch s thick. for an- e heatgrass are suitable for seeding. The grass ,; The un erlying material to a depth of 60 inches is pale Th gyp- selected should meet the seasonal needs of livestock. It l; brow and very pale brown, stratified, mottled loamy loa ;e- can be seeded into a clean, firm sorghum stubble, or its sa 940598 WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, SOUTHERN PA- 101 TABLE 0.--BUILDING SITE DEVELOPMENT--Continued Soil name and 1 Shallow Dwellings Dwellings Small Local roads map symbol 1 excavations without with commercial and streets basements basements buildings tg Moderate: Severe: Severe: Severe: Severe: Colombo floods. • floods. floods. floods. floods. 20 SlightModerate: Moderate: Moderate: Moderate: Colombo 1 low strength. low strength. low strength. low strength, frost action. 21 , 22 Severe: :Moderate: Slight Moderate: Severe: Dacono cutbanks cave. 1 low strength, low strength, shrink-swell, shrink-swell. shrink-swell. , low strength. 23, 24 Sligh' Moderate: ,Moderate: [Moderate: Moderate: Fort Collins low strength. low strength, I low strength. low strength. shrink-swell. 25, 26 Severe: Severe: Severe: Severe: Severe: Haverson floods. floods. , floods. floods. floods. 27, 28 Severe: Severe: Severe: Severe: Severe: Ileldt too clayey. shrink-swell, shrink-swell , shrink-swell, shrink-swell , low strength. low strength. low strength. low strength. 29, 30 Siigh' Moderate: ,Moderate: Moderate: Moderate: Julesburg low strength. 1 low strength. low strength. , low strength, frost action. 31 ,/ 2 ' Slight Moderate: Moderate: Moderate: ;Moderate: Kim---- low strength. low strength. low strength. 1 low strength. 33, 4_ Slight Moderate: Moderate: Moderate: (Moderate: Kr ,% low strength. low strength. low strength, 1 low strength. slope. 35*: Loup Severe: [Severe: [Severe: Severe: Severe: wetness, 1 wetness, wetness, wetness, wetness. cutbanks cave. 1 floods. 1 Floods. floods. , Doe' Severe: [Severe: [Severe: [Severe: Severe: wetness, , wetness, wetness, I wetness, wetness, floods, , floods. floods. floods. floods. cutbanks cave. 36*: ' Midway Severe: Severe: Severe: Severe: :Severe: too clayey. shrink-swell, shrink-swell, , slope, : shrink-swell, • low strength. low strength. 1 shrink-swell, 1 low strength. . I low strength. , Shingle Severe: Severe: ,Severe: [Severe: [Severe: ' depth to rock. ' depth to rock. ' depth to rock. depth to rock, [ depth to rock. , slope. - 37 Severe: [Moderato: :Severe: [Moderate: Moderate: • Nelson depth to rock. ; depth to rock, 1 depth to rock. I depth to rock, depth to rock, low strength. 1 1 low strength. low strength. 35 ['[Severe: Moderate: ;Severe: ;Moderate: Moderate: Nelson 1 depth to rock. depth to rock, depth to rock. I slope, depth to rock, low strength. [ depth to rock, low strength. low strength. I , 393 40, 41, 42,• . Severe: ; Moderate: Severe: [Severe: Severe: I Nunn too clayey. shrink-swell, shrink-swell, 1 shrink-swell, shrink-swell, low strength. , low strength. ' low strength. low strength. See footnote at end of table. 1 A 1 i 940508 ,...LD COUNTY, COLORADO, SOUTHERN PARS 105 105 TABLE 7.--SANITARY FACILITIES--Continued — _n____— _r— Trench Area Daily cover Se tic tank Sewage lagoon I sanitary sanitary for landfill Soil name and P areaslandfill , map symbol absorption _ landfill fields , _. -- -- Slight Fair: 21 , 22 ;Severe: Severe: v ere: too clayey. Dacono pares s:o HQy, seepage. aepage. 23 (Moderate: Moderate: ,;light Slight Gpod. Fort Collins I pores slowly. seepage. Good. pal Moderate: 'Moderate: ',Slight Slight Fort Collins pores slowly. seepage, slope. ;Severe:cr e; Severe: ',Severe: Good. 25, er26 flood: floods. flcocs floods. floods averson ',poor: ;Severe: ;Slight ores I slopate: too clayey. 27, 28slope. i too clayey. 9 eldt pc res .,lowly. ',Good. Severe: ;Severe: S seep seepage. 29 3G ,Slight seepage. seepage. � J u'_asburg ;Slight ;Good. Slight '.,Moderate: ,Slight 31 seepage. Kim ;Slight ;Good. ,Slight ;Moderate: ('Slight 32, 33 seepage, m slope. (a l- ;Severe: Slight ;Slight (Good. V 3I (slight slope . s _- m ., _ . :v,:r :Poor; ,. 35*' evert -nett,c.. _ r:-not, , :lG :3. of ue, floods, f...Gd . floods seepage. 36': B5 ,Severe: were: ;Severe: ;Moderate: 'Poor: :lid way too clayey, Pe res s:o'..1„ depth to roc,., depth to rock, slope. thin layer. depth to rock.. ' slope. too clayey. �.d Severe: Moderate: . shingle IC depth: ;Severe: thin layer. x,SV, depth to rock. I slope, I depth to rock. slope. 9 , depth to roc',: ' r (y` i3 3d ;Severe: ',Severe: ',Severe: 'Severe: ',Fair: . _s„ depth to rock. I depth to rock, I depth to rock, seepage. I thin layer. * seepage. seepage. a3r ii sv>. ;e, Slight ;Flight =air: Don Per 'le w.y excess humus. c� =. �� too clayey.12 4 ti'Np 'Severe: Moderate: Slight Slight Fair: Funs pores slowly. I eyoess humus, too clayey. �vs slope. Sever,. 'lode^ate Slight Slight Fair: ,Num pores slowly. , excess humus. too clayey. g . 12 Severe ;Moderate: Slight Slight 'Fair: d Nunn Far.,s slowly execs humus , ; too clayey. ,a + , slope . , ' Y, See footnote at end of table. id ;1 1,, tj d' O. ' tw 940508 WELD COUNTY, COLORAL3, SOUTHERN P• 109 TABLE 8.--CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS--Continued Topsoil --- _. ..___ _.____me.____ Sand Gravel Roadfill ;oil name and — map symbol -T __ Good. Unsuited-----------'- ;poor: P low excess fines. 29 , 3U___________ low strength, J ulesburg frost action. unsuited------------- Unsuited----------'- - Good. air: 3'" 32, 3'/ 3y'- -� low strength. :L i,n Poor: unsuited: wetness. 35*: IFair: excess fines. ;Poor:----- excess fines. Loup_________ wetness. Fair: Unsuited-------- thin: layer. ;Fair:'Fair: excess tines. wetness. , ;Poor 6*: Unsuitc..------------- 'Unsuited------------- too clayey. ________ Poor: %,id wa`1--"--- shrink-swell, •• low strength, thin layer. ___',Poor., �,_____________',Unsuited------'--- , area reclaim. nsuite� ?oor: , thin layer. ',Good. ',L'n suited_____________',Unsuited_____________ 1 Poor: JN thin layer . . 'Fair: Nelson 'Unsuited---- ---- thin: layer. • IOnsui`cd_____________, Poor: 39 , qq_______________ shrink-swell, ' Nunn low strength. I ;Fair: ., ________',Unsuited_____________ thin layer , Poor: , , too clayey. q1 V2________ shrink-swell ,h Nunn low strength. ',poor: , !Unsuited tap_____________ too sandy. oor .� Shrink-such , Dunn 1 low strength. 'main:. ',Unsuited-------------'' too sandy, 'Poor: ' Fair: °roes thin layer. ------, excess 44 , 4g__________ � low strength. Olney . . (Good. 'Unsuited - I'Poor: Fair. excess fines. ', "Ol Ay , low strength. ___',Poor: Olney av____________ , Unsuited__________ too sandy. , ______ , oor. ' fines. Good excass Osgood ,Unsuited---- -------------;Good. poor: -- Gocd_________________ , excess fines. 50, 52, 7f________ ',Good. Otero . . ____',Unsuited____________ Uns�itcd------------- , Sp r5________________ Fair rw strength, , Paoli frost action. 1 __ ',poor: __ Unsuited---------- thin layer. ________ ',Poor: ;Unsuited___________ 5G, o7-_______ strength,t' , !io no'n ill thin layer . Poor: unsuited___________ __,Unsuited-------- area reclaim. 'Poor: ,, 58, y9_______ thin layer . Shingle _ Poor: f (Unsuited----------- area reclaim. dd�: ,yin salted________ • poor: Shingle thin layer. ' See footnote at end of table. - - _ -V-`305,.7t16i ' • N a ta,-z"risx ��r.,�a""S 1-. '�^m" "Y�' "� +ielr�� 1 ,2 SOIL SURVEY TABLE C.--WATER MANAGEMENT--Continued T--- —r_ Soil name and Pond Embankments, Drainage Irrigation Terraces Grassed map symbol reservoir dikes, and and , waterways areas levees _diversions 20 Seepage Low strength, Floods, Slope, Erodes easily Erodes easily. Colombo compressible. slope. erodes easily. 21 , 22 Seepage Shrink-swell , Slope, Slow intake, Peres slowly--- Peres slowly. Dacono seepage, pores slowly. slope. I , piping. 23 Seepage ;Low strength--- Peres slowly--- Favorable Favorable Favorable. Fort Collins 24 Slope, [Low strength--- Slope , ,Slope ,Favorable Favorable. Fort Collins seepage. percs slowly. 25 Seepage [Low strength, Floods Floods [Floods, Favorable. Haverson ', compressible, I piping. pip 25 [Seepage Low strength, Slope Slope Floods, Favorable. Haverson compressible, ' piping. piping. 27, 28 ;Slope Low strength, Peres slowly, Slope , Peres slowly--- Peres slowly. Ileldt shrink-swell. slope. percs slowly, ; slow intake. 29 Seepage Seepage, Favorable [Droughty Soil blowing, Erodes easily. Julesburg piping, piping low strength. 30 Seepage, [Seepage, Slope Droughty, Soil blowing, Erodes easily. Julesburg slope. [ piping, slope, piping. low strength. erodes easily. 31 -Seepage, Piping, Favorable Favorable Slope , ;Slope. Kim slope. low strength, piping. , hard to pack. 32, 33, 13'+- Seepage, Piping, Slope Slope Slope, Slope. :Kim - slope. low strength, piping. hard to pack. 3"s* Loop Seepage [Seepage, Poor outlets, Wetness, Wetness Wetness. ' piping, cutbanks cave. seepage. Noel Seepage ;Seepage, Wetness, Fast intake, Wetness, Wetness, erodes easily, floods, seepage , too sandy. floods. piping. poor outlets. wetness. 3t": Midway Slope, Thin layer, Complex slope, ' Complex slope, Slope , Slope, depth to rock, shrink-swell , depth to rock, rooting depth, depth to rock, percs slowly, seepage. low strength. excess salt. excess salt. poor outlets. excess salt. Shingle Slope, Low strength, Depth to rock, Slope, Slope, Slope, depth to rock. , thin layer . slope. rooting depth. depth to rock. rooting depth. _37 Depth to rock, Piping, Slope, Slope, Depth to rock Rooting depth. Nelson _ seepage. thin layer, depth to rock. rooting depth. low strength. 38 Slope, Piping, Slope, ,Slope, Slope, Slope, Nelson depth to rock, [ thin layer, depth to rock. rooting depth. depth to rock. rooting depth. seepage. lea strength. 3D Favorable Compressible, [Peres slowly---,Peres slowly--- Peres slowly--- F :vorabl e. Nunn shrink-swell, ' hard to pack. Sea footnote at end of table. • 940508 WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, SOUTHERN PART 125 TABLE 12.--ENGINEERING PROPERTIES AND CLASSIFICATIONS--Continued --- -- -- _ Classification ',Frag- 1 Percentage passing Soil came and Depth USDA texture ;ments sieve number-- !Liquid 1 Plas- ma() Unified 1 AASMTO > 3 1 limit 1 ticity symbol inches! 4 10 40 200 index jn Pot � Pot ___. 14, 15, 16, 17 0-7 Loam CL-ML A 0 100 100 190-100 85-1001 25-30 5-10 Colby 7-60,Silt loam, loam, CL-ML A-4 0 100 100 190-100 85-1001 25-30 5-10 I very fine sandy I loam. 13x: CL-h:L f.-4 0 100 100 90-100 85-100 25-30 5-10 Colby I 0-7 !Loam 17-60',Silt loam, loam, ICL-ML ��-'I 0 100 100 90-100 85-100 25-30 5-1 0 very fine sondy1 I loam. 0-6 Loam, NIL A-4 0 100 100 90-100 70-90 20-30 NP-5 Adana 7 0 100 100 95-100 80-90 35-60 15-35 5-9 Clay, clay loam, IC:^:, CL A-6, G-, silty clay loam. 9-60,6,o arm, silt loam, ll4L it-4 0 100 100 90-100 75-90 20-30 NP-5 very fine sandy) loam. 19, 20 0-141Clay loam ICL-ML IA-4 0 195-100 80-100 75-90 50-70 25-30 5-10 211Clay loam, loam 1CL ' IA-6 0 195-100 75-100 75-90 50-70 20-30 10-15 -,ol orabo 21-60 Stratified clay IC`, CL-NIL IA-4, A-6 0-5 190-100 75-100 70-90 50-60 20-30 5-15 loam to sand. ' 21 , 72 0-12 Clay loam CL, � X A-6, A-4 0 85-100 75-100 75-95 70-80 20-40 5-20 Dacono CL-ML 112-21 Clay loam, clay, ICL A-6, A-7 0 75-100 60-100 55-95 50-85 35-45 15-20 gravelly clay loom. 40-85 25-40 10-20 21-27 Sandy clay loam, CL, SC IA-6 0 75-100 60-100 50-95 loam, silt I 2, 6n loam.gravelly SP, GP -1 0 135-80 5-50 5-40 0-5 --- NP ery sand. 2q, 0-7 Loam 'CL-ML r, 0 195-100 90-100 85-100150-65 25-30 5-10 1 For Collins 7-11 Loam, clay loam CL Id-6 0 195-100 90-100 85-95 160-75 25-40 15-25 11-50.Loam, fine sandy CL, CL-MLIA-4 , A-6 0 95-100 90-100 80-95 150-75 25-35 5-15 I loam. , 35, 26 0-4 ',Loam ML, CL-ML,IP.-4 0 95-100 80-100 75-90 150-60 I 20-30 NP-10 ...crsor. 1 4-601Stratified clay 0 s, CL-ELIA-4 0 95-10 75-100 75-90 50-60 1 20-30 NP-10 loam to sand . CH, CL 0 195-100 95-100 95-100 75-95 u5-55 25-35 27 28 0-601C.1ty clay _ ' , .dC 309-12:Sandy loamML 2, A-i0 195-100 75-100 45-85 25-55 --- NP ,� 7 ;ine sandy loam, ML A ..�_ � 0 95-100 75-100 50-85 30-55 115-25 NP-5 L sburp, sandy loam. --- NP 27-60 ',Sandy loam, .,,, �,'�t-1, 0 95-100 75-100 00-85 15-50 loamy sand , ' fine sand. -1 _4 0-5 9O-100 75-100 50-90 45-75 20-35 NP-5 33, 3'+- --- 1 Loam 'L S, _r,, A_6 0-5 80-100 75-100 70-95 60-85 25-40 5-15 '.,n 0W Loam, and L� G ii A 1riv 61 Fine sandy ,, , ML � -4 C-3 m30_100 75-100 70-95 40-55 20-30 NP-5 100 100 50-100 15-30 --- NP 10 Loo m :. --Z 0 --- NP boo? _S 1-2, „ 0 100 100 65-100 5-20 c o,i l.o ar9 'rd , ' A 0 100 100 35-95 20-35 --- NP Pool 0 14 Loony sand 0 100 , 100 85-95 0-25 --- NP 14-601 Fine sand , ... ;�P, :.r' - I fine sand, 1 SP-SM coarse sand. - ' ' o-131C1ay '4d, Mb -7 0 100 100 90-100 Bo_95 4--60 20-35 1 , 13 Weathered -__ --- bedrock. See footnote at end of table. 940508 - 130 SOIL SURVEY TABLE 13.--PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF SOILS--Continued Risk of corrosion 1 Erosion Wind Soil name and Depth Permea- Available Soil ;Salinity; Shrink- I factors erodi- __ map symbol bility water reaction 1 ' swell :Uncoated Concrete 1 bility capacity ;potential steel _-_ I_K__IT_ Croup_ In In/hr In/in , pH ',Mmhos/cm; 20, 30 0-12 2.0-20 0.11-0. 15 6.6-7.8 <2 ILow Moderate Low 10.24 5 3 Julesburg 12-27 2.0-20 0.11-0.15 6.6-7.8 <2 ;Low Moderate Low 10.24 27-60 >6.0 0.05-0.13 6.6-7.8 <2 ILow Moderate Low 31 , 32, 33, 3i;- --- 0-12 0.6-2.0 0.16-0.18 7.9-8.4 <2 ;Low Moderate Low 10.32 5 IL Kim 12-60 0.6-2.0 0.15-0.17 7.9-8-4 <2 :Low Moderate Low 10.32 35*: Loup 0-16 6.0-20 0. 10-0. 14 6.6-8.4 <2 Low High Low 0.17 5 2 16-60 6.0-20 0.06-0.08 7.4-8.4 <2 Low High Low 0.17 Poet 0-14 6.0-20 0.10-0. 12 6.6-8.4 <2 ;Low High Low 0. 17 5 2 14-60 6.0-20 0.05-0.07 6.6-8.4 <2 ILow high Low 0. 17 36*: Midway 0-13 0.06-0.2 0.12-0.17 7.9-9.0 2-8 High High Lo-- 0.43 1 4 13 ___ _-_ Shingle 0-6 0.6-2.0 0. 16-0. 18 7.4-9.0 <2 Low High Low 0.32 2 4L 6-18 0.6-2.0 0.16-0.21 7.9-9.0 <2 -Moderate High Low 0.49 1 ___ 37, 38 ', 0-9 2.0-6.0 0. :?.-0.15 7.9-8.4 <2 Low High Low 0.20 2 3 • Nelson 1 9-30 2.0-6.0 0.11-0.13 7.9-8.4 <2 Low High Low 0.20 39, 40, 41 , 42 0-9 0.2-2.0 0.15-0.20 6.6-7.8 <2 Moderate Moderate Low 0.24 5 6 Nunn 1 9-29 0.06-0.6 0. 15-0.18 7.4-8.4 <2 High High Low 0.28 29-60 0.2-2.0 0. 10-0. 18 7.4-8.4 <2 Moderate High Low 0.24 3 0-9 2.0-6.0 0. 10-0. 14 6.6-7.8 <2 Low Moderate Low 0.15 5 3 Nunn 9-29 0.06-0.6 0.15-0.18 7.4-8,4 <2 High High Low 0.28 29-50 0.2-2.0 0.10-0. 18 7.4-8.4 <2 Moderate High Low 0.24 04, e5 0-10 6.0-20 0.06-0. 10 6.6-7.8 <2 Low Low Low 0. 17 5 2 Glney 10-20 0.6-2.0 0.13-0.15 6.5-7.8 <2 Moderate High Low 0.24 20-25 0.6-6.0 0. 11-0. 15 7.9-8.4 <2 Low High Low 0.24 25-60 2.0-6.0 0.06-0.13; 7.9-8.4 <2 Low High Low 0.20 46, 47, 18 0-10 0.6-6.0 0.11-0.151 6.6-7.8 <2 Low Moderate Low 0.20 5 3 Olney 10-20 0.6-2.0 0.13-0. 15 6.6-7.8 <2 Moderate High Low 0.24 20-25 0.6-6.0 0.11-0.15 7.9-8.4 <2 Low High Low 0.24 25-60 2.0-5.0 0.06-0. 13 7.9-8.4 . <2 Low High Low 0.20 49 0-22 6.0-20 ,0.05-0.081 8.5-7.3 --- Low Low Low 0.10 5 1 Osgood 22-34 2.0-6.0 10.10-0.131 6.5-7.3 --- Low Low Low 0.17 .,I-60 6.0-20 10.06-0.0; 1 6.6-8.4 <2 Low Moderate Low 0. 10 50, 51 , 52, 53 0-12 6.0-20 ;0.09-0. 131 7.4-8.0 <2 Low High Low ,0. 10 5 2 Otero 12-60 6.0-20 10.08-0.12 7.4-8.4 <4 Low High Low 0.10 54, 55 0-201 0.6-2.0 10.16-0.18 . 6.6-7.3 --- ILow Moderate Low 0.20 5 5 Paoli 20-25 >6.0 0. 14-0. 17 7.4-7.8 <2 1Low High Low 0.20 25-60 >6.0 0.12-0. 14 , 7.6-8.4 <2 ILom High Low 0.20 56, 57 0-9 0.2-0.6 0.17-0.21 6.6-7.8 <2 Moderate High Low 0.37 3 6 Renohill 9-32 0.06-0.2 0. 14-0. 16 6.5-8.4 <2 High High Low 0.32, 32 --- --- ---c --- 50 0-6 0.6-2.0 .0.16-0.18 7.e-9.0 <2 Low High Low 0.32 2 4L Shingle 6-18 0.6-2.0 0.16-0.21 7.9-9.0 <2. Moderate High Low 0_49 18 ___ ___ 59*: Shing,lc 0-6 0.6-2.0 0.16-0. 18 7.4-9.0 <2 Low High Low 0.12 2 4L 6-18 0.6-2.0 0.16-0.21 7.9-9.0 (2 (Moderate High Low 0.49 18 ___ --- --- ___ See footnote at end of table. 94i0S98 132 SOIL SURVEY TABLE 1'7.--SOIL AND WATER FEATURES [Absence of an entry indicates the feature is not a concern. See text for descriptions of symbols and such terms as "rare," "brief," and "perched." The symbol < means less than; > means greater than] F Flooding : High water table Bedrock Soil name and Hydro-1 1 : ��--ter 1 . Potential map symbol logic; Frequency 1 Duration. :Months Depth , Kind ;Months :Depth:Hard- frost _�_____ &roup : : : 1 ; ; ness M action (( , , , I n t , — 1 ; ; , 1, 2 B lone ; --- --- >6.0 : --- --- ; >60 --- Moderate. • Altvan I ; 1 3Aquolls ; 0 ;Frequent---- Brief :Apr—Jun 0.5-1.C1Apparent Apr—Jun; >60 --- High. : Aquents I) ;Frequent---- Brief ;Apr-Jun 0.5-1.0 Apparent,Apr-Jun >60 ; --- High. I ; Aquolls 0 :Frequent---- Brief :Apr-Jun 0.5-1.5 Apparent;Apr-Jun >60 --- High. Aquepts D ;Frequent---- Brief :Apr-Jun 0.5-1.5 Apparent;Apr-Jun >60 --- High. 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 B ,None : --- , --- >6.0 --- , --- >60 --- Moderate. Ascalon : I I , 10 A ,Frequent---- Brief :Mar-Jun >6.0 --- ' --- >60 , --- ,Low. Bankard :None --- --- 11, 12 B >6.0 --- --- >60 : --- :Moderate. � Bresser : , : 13 A ,None , --- --- >6.0 --- --- >60 --- Low. Cascajo 14, 15, 16, 17----, B None . --- --- >6.0 --- , --- >60 , --- Low. i Colby 18': , Colby , B None --- --- , >6.0 --- , --- , >60 --- :Low. Adena : C . Ncne : --- --- : >6.0 --- : --- : >60 --- :Low. , 19, 20 B Rare I >6.0 : --- : --- , >60 --- :Moderate. Colombo 21, 22 : C None -- : --- >6.0 : --- : --- 1 >60 : --- :Low. Dacono ' ' 23, 2+4 B :None to rare: --- : --- 1 >6.0 : --- --- >60 : --- 1Low. Fort Collins , ' 25, 26 B ,Rare to Brief May-Sep >6.0 : --- --- >60 --- ;Low. , Havcrson , I common. ' ' 1 I , 27, 28 : C :'Done --- , --- ; >6.0 : --- --- , >60 ' --- 'Low. Heldt : 29, 30 : A ;None --- : --- >6.0 --- --- >60 --- Moderate. Juleshurg , I : 1 31 , 32, 33, ---: B- ;None --- --- >6.0 , --- : : >60 : --- :Low. I Kim : I : : : ; ; 35': 1 Loup : D :Rare to :Brief :Mar-Jun +.5-1.5 Apparent Nov-May >60 , --- Moderate. I common. : ' ' I Rod A Occasional Brief :Mar-Jun 1.5-3.5 Apparent Nov-May >60 : --- Moderate. 364*: : -Midway D None --- --- >6.0 : --- : --- 10-201Rip- Low. : pablc See footnote at end of table. 940598 REFERRAL LIST NAME: Gregory B. and Kristie Kay Bement CASE NUMBER: USR-1043 REFERRALS SENT: March 30, 1994 REFERRALS TO BE RECEIVED BY: April 13, 1994 COUNTY TOWNS and CITIES Attorney Ault �X Health Department _Brighton r Extension Service Broomfield X Emergency Management Office _Dacono / Sheriff's Office Eaton VX Engineering Erie Housing Authority Evans // Airport Authority Firestone �/ X Building Inspection Fort Lupton Frederick STATE _Garden City Division of Water Resources Gilcrest _Geological Survey X Greeley _Department of Health ____Grover _Department of Transportation ____Hudson Historical Society ____Johnstown Water Conservation Board ____Keenesburg Oil and Gas Conservation Commission ____Kersey La Salle FIRE DISTRICTS _Lochbuie _Ault F-1 _Longmont Berthoud F-2 Mead Briggsdale F-24 Milliken _Brighton F-3 New Raymer Eaton F-4 _Northglenn Fort Lupton F-5 Nunn _ Galeton F-6 _Pierce Hudson F-7 Platteville Johnstown F-8 everance La Salle F-9 Thornton Mountain View F-10 X Windsor Milliken F-11 Nunn F-12 COUNTIES _ Pawnee F-22 Adams _ Platteville F-13 _Boulder _Platte Valley F-14 Larimer Poudre Valley F-15 Raymer F-2 FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES � Southeast Weld F-16 _US Army Corps of Engineers V X —Windsor/Severance F-17 _USDA-APHIS Veterinary Service Wiggins F-18 Federal Aviation Administration Western Hills F-20 _Federal Communication Commission OTHER SOIL CONSERVATION DISTRICTS Central Colo. Water Conservancy Dist. Brighton _ Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. Fort Collins Tri-Area Planning Commission ____Greeley _Longmont West Adams COMMISSION/BOARD MEMBER i EXHIBIT X Ron Summer 940518 lre.....\\ DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES I PHONE (303) 353-3845, EXT. 3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 1400 N. 17TH AVENUE GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 COLORADO March 30, 1994 Gregory B. and Kristie Kay Bement 8402 Weld County Road 62 Windsor, CO 80550 Subject: USR-1043 - Request for a Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for storage and maintenance of delivery trucks for an air freight business with limited storage, transfer, loading, or unloading of freight on site on a parcel of land described as part of the E2 NE4 of Section 5 , T4N, R67W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. Dear Mr. and Mrs. Bement: Your application and related materials for the request described above are complete and in order at the present time. I have scheduled a meeting with the Weld County Planning Commission for May 3, 1994, at 1: 30 p.m. This meeting will take place in the County Commissioners' Hearing Room, first floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado. It is recommended that you and/or a representative be in attendance to answer any questions the Planning Commission members might have with respect to your application. It is the policy of Weld County to refer an application of this nature to any town or municipality lying within three miles of the property in question or if the property under consideration is located within the comprehensive planning area of a town or municipality. Therefore, our office has forwarded a copy of the submitted materials to the Greeley and Windsor Planning Commissions for their review and comments. Please call the City of Greeley at 350-9780 and Janet Carpenter (Windsor) at 686-7476 for further details regarding the dates, times, and places of these meetings. It is recommended that you and/or a representative be in attendance at the Greeley and Windsor Planning Commission Meetings to answer any questions the Commission members may have with respect to your application. It is the responsibility of an applicant to see that a sign is posted on the property under consideration at least 10 days preceding the hearing date. Sometime prior to April 18, 1994, you or a representative should call me to obtain a sign to be posted on the site no later than April 23, 1994. The sign shall be posted adjacent to and visible from a publicly maintained road right-of-way. In the event the property under ^mom, consideration is not adjacent to a publicly maintained road right-of-way, the applicant shall post one sign in the most prominent place on the property and post a second sign at the point at which the driveway (access o drive) intersects a publicly maintained road right-of-way. Your sign posting certificate must be returned to the Department of Planning K Services' office on or before the date of the hearing. W 940538 `._.: Gregory B. and . _stie Kay Bement USR-1043 Page 2 The Department of Planning Services' staff will make a recommendation concerning this application to the Weld County Planning Commission. This recommendation will be available twenty-four (24) hours before the scheduled hearing. It is the responsibility of the applicant to call the Department of Planning Services' office before the Planning Commission hearing to make arrangements to obtain the recommendation. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to call me. Respectfully, A. Sc Current Planner II 940518 ' DATE: April 26, 1994 CASE NUMBER: USR-1043 NAME: Gregory B. and Kristie Kay Bement ADDRESS: 8402 Weld County Road 62, Windsor, CO 80550 REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for storage and maintenance of delivery trucks for an air freight business with limited storage, transfer, loading, or unloading of freight on site. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The E2 NW4 of Section 4, T5N, R67W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: 8402 Weld County Road 62 SIZE OF PARCEL: 2.3 acres ± THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES' STAFF RECOMMEND THAT THIS REQUEST BE APPROVED FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: 1. The submitted materials are in compliance with the application requirements of Section 24. 7 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 2. It is the opinion of the Department of Planning Services' staff that the applicant has shown compliance with Section 24.3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: - The proposal is consistent with the Agricultural Goals and Policies and the Urban Growth Boundary Areas Goals and Policies of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. The proposed Special Use Permit area is not located on productive farm ground and is within the Urban Growth Boundary Area of the Town of Windsor and the City of Greeley. The Town of Windsor reviewed this request and indicated no objections to this request. - The proposal is consistent with the intent of the A (Agricultural) zone district and is provided for as a Use by Special Review. - The proposed use will be compatible with the existing surrounding land uses which include rural residences, dryland pasture, and agricultural production. This proposed use will be compatible with the future development of the surrounding area as permitted by the Agricultural zone district. Conditions of Approval and Development Standards will ensure compatibility. - No overlay districts affect this site. EXHIBIT 5 9405)8 RECOMMENDATION, USR-1043 Gregory B. and Kristie Kay Bement Page 2 - The Special Review Permit Development Standards will provide adequate protection of the health, safety, and welfare of the neighborhood and County. This recommendation is based, in part, upon a review of the application materials submitted by the applicant, other relevant information regarding the request, and responses from referral entities. The Department of Planning Services' staff recommendation for approval is conditional upon the following: 1. The attached Development Standards for the Special Review permit shall be adopted and placed on the Special Review plat prior to recording the plat. The plat shall be delivered to the Department of Planning Services and be ready for recording in the Weld County Clerk and Recorder's office within 15 days of approval by the Board of County Commissioners. 2. The Special Review activity shall not occur nor shall any building or electrical permits be issued on the property until the Special Review plat is ready to be recorded in the office of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. 3. Prior to recording the plat evidence shall be submitted to the Department of Planning Services: - That an ISDS evaluation has been completed by the Weld County Health Department on all existing septic systems. - Adequate toilet facilities shall be provided for employee use. 940528 SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Gregory B. and Kristie Kay Bement USR-1043 1. The Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review permit is for storage and maintenance of delivery trucks for an air freight business with limited storage, transfer, loading, or unloading of freight on site in the A (Agricultural) zone district as submitted in the application materials on file in the Department of Planning Services and subject to the Development Standards stated hereon. 2. Approval of this plan may create a vested property right pursuant to Section 90 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 3. All liquid and solid wastes shall be stored and removed for final disposal in a manner that protects against surface and groundwater contamination. 4. No permanent disposal of wastes shall be permitted at this site. 5. Waste materials shall be handled, stored, and disposed of in a manner that controls fugitive dust, blowing debris, and other potential nuisance conditions. 6. Fugitive dust shall be controlled on this site. 7. The maximum permissible noise level shall not exceed the residential limit of 55 db(a) as measured according to 25-12-102, Colorado Revised Statutes. 8. Trees and bushes adjacent to the east and west of the entrance of this property shall be trimmed along Weld County Road 62 on a regular basis to ensure site distance for ingress and egress to the facility. 9. No outside storage of materials associated with this operation shall be alloed on site. 10. All construction on the property shall be in accordance with the requirements of the Weld County Building Code Ordinance. 11. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Design Standards of Section 24.5 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 12. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Operation Standards of Section 24.6 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 9405?8 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, USR-1043 Gregory B. and Kristie Kay Bement Page 2 13. Personnel from the Weld County Health Department and Weld County Department of Planning Services shall be granted access onto the property at any reasonable time in order to ensure the activities carried out on the property comply with the Development Standards stated hereon and all applicable Weld County Regulations. 14. The Special Review area shall be limited to the plans shown hereon and governed by the foregoing Standards and all applicable Weld County Regulations. Major changes from the plans or Development Standards as shown or stated shall require the approval of an amendment of the Permit by the Weld County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners before such changes from the plans or Development Standards are permitted. Any other changes shall be filed in the office of the Department of Planning Services. 15. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with all of the foregoing Development Standards. Noncompliance with any of the foregoing Development Standards may be reason for revocation of the Permit by the Board of County Commissioners. 940598 OA Ct.4111:116 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE(303)353-3845, EXT.3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 140WI I D C. GREELEY, N. ORA O8NUE COLORADO 80631 COLORADO CORRECTED NOTICE DATE: April 5 , 1994 TO: SURROUNDING PROPERTY/MINERAL OWNERS CASE NUMBER: USA-1043 There will be a Public Hearing before the Weld County Planning Commission on Tuesday, May 3, 1994, at 1:30 p.m. , in the County Commissioners' Hearing Room, First Floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado concerning the request of: NAME: Gregory B. and Kristie Kay Bement FOR: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for storage and maintenance of delivery trucks for an air freight business with limited storage, transfer, loading, or unloading of freight on site. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the E2 NW4 of Section 4, T5N, R67W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: 8402 Weld County Road 62 Your property is within five-hundred (500) feet of the property on which this request has been made or you may have an interest in the minerals located under the property under consideration. For additional information write or telephone Keith A. Schuett, Current Planner II . Comments or objections related to the above request should be submitted in writing to the Weld County Department of Planning Services, 1400 N. 17th Avenue, Greeley, Colorado 80631, on or before the date of public hearing. EXHIBIT 9105113 , SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS AND/OR SUBSURFACE ESTATE/MINERAL OWNERS CORRECTED NOTICE Gregory B. and Kristie Kay Bement USR-1043 Robert E. and Betty M. Lindschmidt 8268 Weld County Road 62 Windsor, CO 80550 Paul L. and Lori A. Staley 8476 Weld County Road 62 Windsor, CO 80550 Albert L. Frye c/o Mrs. Ruby M. Frye 979 Dorothea Road La Habra Heights, CA 90631 Trollco, Inc. P.O. Box 1727 Greeley, CO 80632-1727 1 swan 940508 l 6 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING I hereby certify that I have placed a true and correct copy of the surrounding property owners and owners and lessees of minerals in accordance with the notification requirements of Weld County in Case Number USR-1043 for Gregory B. and Kristie Kay Bement in the United States Mail, postage prepaid First Class Mail by letter as addressed on the attached list. this 5th day of April, 1994. axiii'it 940528 '-- lr J a•' .\ a •Y Mir l !.f 91 _ 1•• ••�Lr •o , ° • 1 2 ni °� • 1 82."°0',:::), Let: ° r „ ® i� •°° T 7N...J !!Lt* - - - °!•"• I -.\• - - F' • a` •° - - - . 80. . . . :ft..: r _ r tI 33ANI. 34 •rr e 6N£d • W£5T£RN: .•I RAILWAY• )IIIIIN 2 C � 33 .SEVEF4NG Par o I� e C. 1 ._ R [ 1)i! . — o — �AIrn • Via 1 • i. Lad ( • °It' il % 8 �tirA•W�• .. r.°o..• 74 k carou A 72 .a•�o 1 t!1•r ..• I .. e. :--_ •. x• 1 r ° I i� Ii • ^ a 70 xt l. 6 L6N. tl'®War zo -..> 1 'YI .. ®Iv_ ��L .. _ �'�.� � '� a •'° .,. B ro u,.r Q r, •••."‘s o •• i •.�IwueSF� •24 Jc • iiM•• . [ ; {� MON O 1 li ' I� \ it I$ 1 •� ! SOUtAFAN ! t 1113 iiilL r ` 6y-" • t 3. Ntiii,..., ,-L. ,. • IgiliSlkileilliallillig, , I.� �®rte . ',�i� — Lars Qkvir FEPr �' D 4 -qV� I ;c507-. . S�Iibi• ' S..y. cv' az• !atik pion ��I.i •• . co ra.r,-u,sr G _i /// }A i� .° • '-I' d• \ , '�Yi •aovn.xu �� • • 4 • 40 I 03 r • o �o �• , �� .1' It Ai V' , r, Mi Afl _ e r • p. T 5N - ; I •..-r�. Kc, ' • I I I SoJULri t tIII�� 'ft !`YJ_�_ r _ _ _ _ !M Gr1 � ' I >.; • ny 9 LZ I ' ��,en. First°° !parrectIon 41� .!�. ©a /�' P.r • �� F � O oPsi,LE P 17)- I nmrFo. I ' � / � ...�Gt�•ES .� ® �, •r•Dkn . PCs \�_ •I im▪ •▪ o� .. !,?•24,,:*:•• rF..+J - r. ��:f�ri�i l��"_rl� �/ I q® 4, ,ago • • RI, '31; L/� r M.0 NI ❑ ioI ° I '1/1//l/ !®, '� _ i °-_/' 3.. _ _ 'O,'- - _ - ?I _ _.„,,,sii kz M. .•' -Pa; i irlims . : -/•,4: ill. U. MI Mt / • ill ° • . •C SWES ere, j .. •I• • CM •-z• °1 i y . � _ - , ' rows f • •' 1• N�•. A r! r - - - � !Pell . ■ 3 •• EBMCI B �iy!,. ' r � ! 1.•■ � �`.Y81• '® 1 x> • _ 0�'/1,,.'/ ° .� .• •. 3 r — ir° 7, •I'" fo`�Iy ° , 'n i• a„r !a.4 . ..!• -p , �� _ . . 4/60 28 • 27 Li, 00 ''''\____ 494 / b0 a 50 ---- .2'95667-6 lu�� C T p 7 16-4900 col ,I 4750�� , • l 47l _ ____ 4753 _ _{) '_ �— - _ _ �I -- - --— O I ):69,52, � - 4768 p d I 39 1)7 1 4900 33S 34 32 m wso 4750\ _ 4480:. 494 :u _ ,----------4900 (�� 4 �Q t3/4"I 4953- \ �6 II 5 �� Mar— \,. 495 . sy� , 4850_ 4944 - • ri -- - - = I ma - AID Lor '0klaho eh I V - �' I I 9 �� 00 _ 4920 . �1 Y 1 1 AI 490> ,,Poo �' 4933 7.9 o o\ g �/ 7 \ g I Gore - J I �� _ ..1EXHIBIT d' 4958 �: Ifi 64 oa 500052 \\\\ ��VVVVILL��LLL its R4 _ t $0 �t y'.x .y�..p ,,:� : is � 4. ` . 028) . . It r U! jm i' ft • 04 } �,. y '� 4tt1! 4.. .1,04:::, „ I 5' � . "' . . 1 J f J,xsct:� �- .. f . 029 i t zxrd ,,,fz xy 4r ',t , s i 4. r Y ax / JVyt .t. i ,if # x I-t ..daa'... .. t k }; i `, t 3 +Y r YR�p' VL t .. C a{Jy. N Y,. 't•: r' .. EXHIBIT aJ ;ter i` .e r .. 44"...a‘td DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES 1 PHONE(303)353-3845, EXT. 3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 14011 p 0 GREELEY, N. ORAO AVENUE COLORADO 80631 COLORADO NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Weld County Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, May 3, 1994, at 1:30 p.m. for the purpose of considering a Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for the property described below. Approval of the request may create a vested property right pursuant to Colorado Law. APPLICANT: Gregory B. and Kristie Kay Bement LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the E2 NW4 of Section 4, T5N, R67W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. TYPE AND INTENSITY OF PROPOSED USE: Storage and maintenance of delivery trucks for an air freight business with limited storage, transfer, loading, or unloading of freight on site. LOCATION: 8402 Weld County Road 62 SIZE: 2.3 acres, more or less The public hearing will be held in the Weld County Commissioners' Hearing Room, First Floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado. Comments or objections related to the above request should be submitted in writing to the Weld County Department of Planning Services , 1400 N. 17th Avenue, Greeley, Colorado 80631, before the above date or presented at the public hearing on May 3, 1994. Copies of the application are available for public inspection in the Department of Planning Services , 1400 N. 17th Avenue, Greeley, Colorado 80631 - Phone - 353-6100, Extension 3540. Judy Yamaguchi, Chairperson Weld County Planning Commission To be published in the Windsor Beacon To be published op' (1) time by ril 7, 1994 Received by: ' k. lL' — Date: /5 /E y/ + IXNISIT 940538 i -1-- DATE: April 26, 1994 CASE NUMBER: USR-1043 NAME: Gregory B. and Kristie Kay Bement ADDRESS: 8402 Weld County Road 62, Windsor, CO 80550 REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for storage and maintenance of delivery trucks for an air freight business with limited storage, transfer, loading, or unloading of freight on site. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The E2 NW4 of Section 4, T5N, R67W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: 8402 Weld County Road 62 SIZE OF PARCEL: 2.3 acres ± POSSIBLE ISSUES SUMMARIZED FROM APPLICATION MATERIALS: The criteria for review of this Special Review permit is listed in Section 24.3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. The Department of Planning Services' staff has received responses from the following agencies: 1. Weld County Health Department 2. Weld County Engineering Department 3. Windsor Fire Protection District 4. Town of Windsor 5. Weld County Office of Emergency Management 6. Weld County Building Inspection The Department of Planning Services' staff has received one letter from a surrounding property owner. 4 • IXHISIT 940S98 FIELD CHECK FILING NUMBER: USR-1043 DATE OF INSPECTION: April 14, 1994 APPLICANT'S NAME: Gregory B. and Kristie Kay Bement REQUEST: Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review permit for LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the E2 NE4 of Section 5, T4N, R67W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: 8402 Weld County Road 62. LAND USE: N Irrigated farm production, rural residence E Dryland pasture S Dryland pasture W Dryland pasture, rural residence ZONING: N A (Agricultural) E A (Agricultural) S A (Agricultural) W A (Agricultural) COMMENTS: The property has one access onto Weld County Road 62. The property slopes from the north down to the south. Trees along the north side of the property screen the site from view. A large metal structure is on site where the freight business is conducted. Mr. Bement lives in a double wide mobile home on site. Ke h rrent Planner II + EXHIBIT 9 105` 8 I /D 00 ThI(1 ATI; mEmoRAnDum Wilk Keith Schuett ro Planning Date April 5 1994 COLORADO From Donald Carroll Subject: Gregory B. and Kristie Kay Bement USR-1043 I have visited the site at 8402 WCR 62 and talked to the applicant. The following are my comments: The applicant has placed new road base and has adequate parking on site. Both the modular house and the metal building are existing on the site with no storm-water problems visible. My only concerns would be to trim the trees and bushes at the entrance to the facility for the sight distance. Also, the existing 15" culvert at the access is plugged on the east end. I would like to see this cleaned out to accommodate drainage. cc: Commissioner Kirkmeyer File &T__-t 1994yy'.. M'V"1nQQ=QQQQQQ i IXNIIIT 9405'28 1 // vet mEmoRAnDum VIIDC. Weldh ountytt Weld County Planning April 6, 1994 To Dete COLORADO Jeff Stoll, M.P.H. , Director, Environmental Protection Svs.. From Case Number: USR-1043 Name: Bement, Gregory/Kristie Subject: PT E2 NE4 of Section 05, Township 04 North, Range 67 West Environmental Protection Services has reviewed this proposal; the following conditions are recommended to be part of any approval: 1. All liquid and solid wastes shall be stored and removed for final disposal in a manner that protects against surface and groundwater contamination. 2. No permanent disposal of wastes shall be permitted at this site. 3. Waste materials shall be handled, stored, and disposed in a manner that controls fugitive dust, blowing debris, and other potential nuisance conditions. 4. Fugitive dust shall be controlled on this site. 5. The maximum permissible noise level shall not exceed the residential limit of 55 db(A) as measured according to 25-12-102, Colorado Revised Statutes. 6. Any existing septic system(s) which is not currently permitted through the Weld County Health Department will require an I.S.D.S. Evaluation prior to the issuance of the required septic permit(s) . In the event the system(s) is found to be inadequate, the system(s) must be brought into compliance with current I.S.D.S. regulations. 7. Adequate toilet facilities shall be provided for the public. 8. An individual sewage disposal system, is required for the proposed facility and shall be installed according to the Weld County Individual Sewage Disposal Regulations. The septic system is required to be designed by a Colorado Registered Professional Engineer according to the Weld County Individual Sewage Disposal Regulations. 9. The existing septic system must be evaluated by a Colorado Registered Professional Engineer and a copy of that review submitted to this Division. In the event the system is found to be inadequate, it must be brought into compliance with current regulations. )9,WMJLS/lam 540 APR 1 2 1994 " IrniuPlan* IXHilIT 940518 . fat .. .. 411011H\ DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303)353-3845, EXT. 3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES live 1400 N. 17TH AVENUE GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 COLORADO March 30, 1994 CASE NUMBER: USR-1043 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from Gregory B. and Kristie Kay Bement for a Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for storage and maintenance of delivery trucks for an air freight business with limited storage, transfer, loading, or unloading of freight on site. The parcel of land is described as part of the E2 NE4 of Section 5 , T4N, R67W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is 8402 Weld County Road 62 . This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by April 13, 1994, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Keith A. Schuett, Current Planner II, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2. 1.Z-1e Flo not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request / 5 (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: 3. ✓ We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. ,�0 /�/ kPleaase refer to the enclosed letter. / Signed: ), Tei Agency: 7�.'a j_579/-r tire" Dr/ Date: it —,5 —7 y t IfXMISIT APR07 1994/3 .-- -•**anon I 940518 1 \,4;-- ,,, � DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303)353-3845, EXT. 3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 140lige. ON ORA O8 UE GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 COLORADO March 30, 1994 CASE NUMBER: USR-1043 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from Gregory B. and Kristie Kay Bement for a Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for storage and maintenance of delivery trucks for an air freight business with limited storage, transfer, loading, or unloading of freight on site. The parcel of land is described as part of the E2 NE4 of Section 5, T4N, R67W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is 8402 Weld County Road 62 . This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by April 13, 1994, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Keith A. Schuett, Current Planner II, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: 3. (/ We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Please refer to the enclosed letter. �� nn � % `fir/' Signed . �'.�—t�-r✓ Agency: ,9r?2l)-? 6� // i l [ J APR 1 9 1994 Date: ii//g/4 / Wald County Manning J el EXHIBIT II / Y 940538 i 4; - iv n , „,----.3/4.\\,u DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303)353-3845, EXT. 3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES A'. o 1400 N. 17TH AVENUE ligGREELEY, COLORADO 80631 Yi COLORADO March 30, 1994 CASE NUMBER: USR-1043 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from Gregory B. and Kristie Kay Bement for a Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for storage and maintenance of delivery trucks for an air freight business with limited storage, transfer, loading, or unloading of freight on site. The parcel of land is described as part of the E2 NE4 of Section 5, T4N, R67W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is 8402 Weld County Road 62. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by April 13, 1994, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Keith A. Schuett, Current Planner II , if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: 3. ,x We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Please refer to the enclosed letter. • ✓ -r ti Signed: G ✓7`v�--.-.-- Agency: zit C` /af-/ ' Date: (�' S3)/ 9' ✓ J Ni‘ 11 it APR 0 41994EXHIBITI /1/45-- *rya-I nn,,nr,Punning 9405)S •:. DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303) 353-3845, EXT. 3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 140 ON ORAAVENUEO631 GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 COLORADO March 30, 1994 CASE NUMBER: USR-1043 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from Gregory B. and Kristie Kay Bement for a Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for storage and maintenance of delivery trucks for an air freight business with limited storage, transfer, loading, or unloading of freight on site. The parcel of land is described as part of the E2 NE4 of Section 5, T4N, R67W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is 8402 Weld County Road 62 . This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by April 13 , 1994, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Keith A. Schuett, Current Planner II, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2 . We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: 3. We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5 . Please referto the enclosed letter. �j� Signed: C7 //JJ .-7 ra-ei Agency: CU c43 V•-r)iuy INXA ,4 Date: 3- 3o- `Y� .4 • EXHIBIT 940515 TROLLCO INCORPORATED Minlir TOTAL LAND UTILIZATION April 4, 1994 Weld County Department of Planning Services Weld County Administrative Offices 1400 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 RE: USR - 1043 Dear Commissioners: Regarding the referenced special use permit, I would simply request that you stay consistent with the intended use for the area. Our property north of this use has been conservatively planned for a golf course community (Poudre Tech Center) . We trust in your judgment and hope you will consider surrounding uses before granting this use. For your information, Windsong Ranch P.U.D. (1 mile south) is fully developed and prohibits this type of use. Respectfully, TROLLCO, INC. LIND LAND, I C. in Lind President mkh r I1 APR 0 7 1994 LH -,.•n-...•,,Dimming a id EXHIBIT' (303)686-5828•FAX: (303)686-2768•8200 Eastman Park Drive•Windsor, CO 80550 i -� 940518 -L_ FIELD CHECK FILING NUMBER: USR-1043 DATE OF INSPECTION: i /7 / /may 7 APPLICANT'S NAME: Gregory B. and Kristie Kay Bement/ CURRENT PLANNER: Keith A. Schuett REQUEST: Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for storage and maintenance for an air freight business with limited storage, transfer, loading, or unloading of freight on site LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the E2 NE4 of Section 5, T4N, R67W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: 8402 Weld County Road 62 nn LAND USE: N ZXgiyit TEc/ /ad' el?a/ E DRy,J4✓0/!/f5 Tdr7£ — FA/R/M4'OS A7f/1fo Y/// rri/ S /D�Ry/141/ 29 5YzlrPf — Gel/ ' ��CO/A75 et hi//5 W 4444 t s T✓Af — .4ARMf/v a 5£ yro X a70O>/ris 34 T ZONING: N A (Agricultural) and City of Windsor E A (Agricultural) S A (Agricultural) W A (Agricultural) COMMENTS: f / / / / /9 Al / oAl"4 �d 4 0 / Piro/4. y /9/4,,J9 l o u.,/7y /Sd h5 ,,//7� / am+ / // / / TLS/o/s dr /.4f 45 -74.217-/ ��/��t.49 TAT /.✓ �J��//.v�.n �c�! cJ/o�l(r! ' S/hi t 7d Ili/ pR/9f-Yy Hvnl .t/o �G/r//, f"/ f S u/Sd//r / / //Sib/ - �i�/f51j e�f nit-ire-v(7/ `ids _3 )Z,3 /'oL fns a �d SLS' 114/ /4 / ./.>-f s Wi// SGrie///il A// ✓/fws /7;0 al /�.FS2 - /6 �AJ o-✓ �tST ,- f/ac/ So d1"�/ Anrf A�1s vt- fiaoR y.i/Fj/ ---; / C-11y-2-72--i-'z.51-7 JLas APR 0 6 1994 x '*r DIannino W 940598 ,valeta* io .,7„: t APRr 2 8 1994 "",.r.,ennity Planning y f� _I (�j 1 , �?S /z4fat (1.d , „ / J �t_ -��-//�; /c t / in \ ..tu- .,'Lkt,.. knc�Llil,t , 4V _ t .O CUL6/6- C' likj 7-- 5 �"l'C it-0 . k_A--A G L C-GL4� 4( l� l�, _,/,(j � �L2�- V jebiLL (A)Q__ W--)* .1_6_t\---(1 0-11- 14' C _1. a. /i _.--tic A.4 1 Ll:��-f-'L'-t,aztt LA,s. a.,. ? -76. wad_ Ct Vic . 4�a Cti�L I,u(a c1 6 C , (Alum ✓SuLt ct.. ,J �.'l.c.J' � 1.�J'v frc *ati .c� �^ ��ups � n) I'� to n //n t� YV cu ,� t,J4� M� tr int / tv-e. _LC.yL L/li ti7LX .-�itre_ l__ : �4' ci_ L4'.L `ti'LL l" L i, l�tt.. cu t o c 14+ I 1.4Y1�.(.4L4 -1i at ,,,04-L. -tb1ti Ant i -4 � lucks �,v, Uce. u1 o-t ctuc i k —TIC XUtL..4- a ice ,Vi_.t-('1 _ ,cr ;�tALL 4- 5 c,. it.,e %,-/c _(:U t 2 G' CLA CLLC „,_ ..C C+L'.`t c e A , 1 t t.4 J . c_ La_-Li-t> if._1U CLi.4 CC , _tt'Ctt "LIC-4_.t.64..J-0. , ✓ `I cYGC'-L tk C `1C i L;td <L J�L<L �.�-l�[:i�k.c{ :r.C yo LYL`t:-L jiLLL. GLi:ci %L`t j:1 a Le-LL— )JCc-k CL4- _ ,1�L --tk 1J £ L ILL ILL( t L - / ..cc J J Cr)" 1 } tL _Lc-cALX iirzU ,, , r .2 j1uci, (.L'CLLk ltt util. C- 11-, ,t c--t t- (liked C.' ,L�'P ));u2-4/ L:Dri Liz ic.),LAfre_ -artc6( ,. 6C, en t(ci.e<-64 _tutill .44.,c..1 .LA--U K-Q-4 4 SU- 0. IC A).-Uzcz,-cc LL 2 L .a-t-t/-141y p M. / (a • � .,Ltr \ ' ' a yt-CL ;h1-6;6kt( J Ot. ,`Lrr dIC .�-iL'C y= CS ° l I ' 1044 ea c r - *, � 0J t c \ o_t x..e,ur� 9 p,e 1-�:.t 1:' �z- � `�u-tit _4,t, _( 1 �_� ,1 (-. .�� /V.l 'L:f `'-.i: -L: l'i-, �j'i.,i; td. _i O- J_V. l.`C.-i � it -;'i'a_ � C / , � ta-t TTY littA.t A , . L; yt-t L, itiv i.,c, yell Gl.l aitt ,.1:Q. t3#,bl. /oadJ: Q 3C)71j2 LO- ✓t-�1- tkcy2.1LeL vpL _ L U tf , / ue cute. Lk_ t zziC -47 1311,cy\4 , r 1 f"1 t{4" .d/-GL L (ii K Al-0-yyvY ,"r art, k `e t c g i/Vi Q- s J c GI't. -Wald- h- ' E.. 4 :. Lc%7 L "✓ i (�c �� 1P ,1)-(4.44-1/41c � t1 ( LCI� �Yl a t� J /J .Lul. LACc� � if. JU O L-'�k,L dad u,A 0\ L z ,L5r A,Lb- a .t,Ki-d1 .1.��) cL +t c/ , J AL(A.t _. �Li.��'_JILL_-��,: „ , Aiod�( / � , ,i24, ..„loynx.2... ylkli „tot, %,(.,0-0-(La d ) p �( .,u" ed- J-14,74 cL i t.d is i Lc t c ,tontft izue-cL ,LLrLM ,Lut G)1 O:141 .lL kL4�1 , ,t- ru,_ �t lbt G cIL. _ZL�y c r I/ r /b l /I( c1-/ �,W0-Lt. `/ ` I' \ \ p, 940528 j0 ;i1EXHIBIT MAY L1994 A I -a- *►®ia rnvntw Planning (4e 9SR - 7o o f 4,1540 tj e,PJ 6a. clie 2 7-delalad -AZIZetri laetttc-72- dare dam- 44 . � �de j . a .64 a- reci-ItAAA . 4 ..71.ea_a/ la A tea-0J i=nn , - „ , /vitt, ,e,tx2t_ Akteialfred z z& �y /2/d a�r� S.tc/a.o. crA /24-n-e. Q a_ wire , Pre f--24-1)ki / to 70. . t. l--eL W oA. 940518 /CA-C /tr.' 2nd Gi ./La ace go? , 0aeoe 4 �e7,44-kcesgtialt 7 Aar-& rya- 6711-, 10-04.7 an A at Ata-- 4 Azdicht/-eal Gde- 7)-z ,GJ %- y ‘34) Gteii.04 6/411/6 OC-ta, Aar /7 /e .1,0a21 /a- ,07Zde-,ceet .t1:4 Zeded 612 Al- .iLtic:te k Zi-e- aid; Aott a_ krzezacin .4(_Lo ..cat , 77/0 1, c. /ed. ‘.2 940598 MAY- 2-14 MON 7:07 - P. 04 0/, 4„ ,, mEMORAnDum Keith Schuett, Planning May 2, 1994 To Data COLORADO Jeff Stoll, Director, Environmental Health 2('!� From f J Subject USR-1043( Greg Bement I spoke with Greg Bement on Friday, April 29, 1994 regarding the requirement for a septic system for his air freight business. He indicated that the only time that employees are on the site for any extended time is on Saturdays for a maximum of two hours. Four employees are engaged in sorting operations during this time. The employees have been using restroom facilities in the existing residence. The existing septic system (Permit G92160) is adequate for this incidental usage and meets the 200-foot proximity requirement for adequate septic facilities. The applicant has also indicated that this Saturday acitivity is temporary and is not expected to last more than one year. In addition, at the time of Our initial review of the referral, I was not aware that the existing septic system was permitted under the previous owner's name, VonTersh. Based on this recent information, I am requesting that you remove the following conditions stated in my memo, dated April 6, 1994; 6. Any existing septic system(s) which is not currently permitted through the Weld County Health Department will require an I,S.D.S. Evaluation prior to the issuance of the required septic permit(s). In the event the system(s) is found to be inadequate, the system(s) must be brought into compliance with current I.S.D.S. regulations. 8. An individual sewage disposal system, is required for the proposed facility and shall be installed according to the Weld County Individual Sewage Disposal Regulations. The septic system is required to be designed by a Colorado Registered Professional Engineer according to the Weld County Individual Sewage Disposal Regulations. 9. The existing septic system must be evaluated by a Colorado Registered Professional Engineer and a copy of that review submitted to this Division. In the event the system is found to be inadequate, it must be brought into compliance with current regulations. JLS/bement,js Post-it'Fax Note 7671 Date °S-Z^ P Phone R Fax# 357-o, Y 40 EXHISIT f MAY 2 '94 07:15 PAGE.004 94051)8 Donald W. Lindauer Farm & Ranch Management Sales & Consulting Colorado • Nebraska•Wyoming May 3 , 1994 TO: Department of Planning Services From: Donald W. Lindauer Re: Case Number: USR-1043 The following comments are for my client , Ruby Frye, owner of the property directly north of subject property, and myself . 1 ) I am not opposed to growth or changes , however, I beleive it is imperative for the County to establish comprehensive development plans to prevent a use of a given property that may have future negative impacts to adjacent properties. 2 ) I have a concern about traffic. Access to the subject property is near the crest of a hill and curve. The additional traffic needed will increase the exposure for potential accidents . 3 ) The current use and business appears to be relative small , however, I have a concern about the County continously approving progressive expansion of the business , in the event the use of the subject property is approved. Based upon the above mentioned comments, I oppose the request for the "Special Permit" on behalf of Ruby Frye and myself . BY: Donald W. Lindauer 0 lk r 0 3 1994 P)annEna7 2308 Mountair Lane • Greeley, Colorado 80631 • 2 (303) 330-2805 940598 Hello