Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout941233 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS MINUTES BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO OCTOBER 19, 1994 TAPE 094-40 The Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, met in regular session in full conformity with the laws of the State of Colorado at the regular place of meeting in the Weld County Centennial Center, Greeley, Colorado, October 19, 1994, at the hour of 9:00 a.m. ROLL CALL: The meeting was called to order by the Chairman and on roll call the following members were present, constituting a quorum of the members thereof: Commissioner W. H. Webster, Chairman Commissioner Dale K. Hall, Pro-Tem Commissioner George E. Baxter Commissioner Constance L. Harbert Commissioner Barbara J. Kirkmeyer - EXCUSED Also present: County Attorney, Bruce T. Barker Acting Clerk to the Board, Shelly Miller Finance and Administration Director, Don Warden MINUTES: Commissioner Harbert moved to approve the minutes of the Board of County Commissioners meeting of October 17, 1994, as printed. Commissioner Baxter seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. ADDITIONS: There were no additions to the agenda. CONSENT AGENDA: Commissioner Harbert moved to approve the consent agenda as printed. Commissioner Baxter seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. PUBLIC INPUT: No public input was offered. WARRANTS: Don Warden, Director of Finance and Administration, presented the following warrants for approval by the Board: General Fund $ 607,875.21 Payroll Fund $ 3,576.23 Handwritten Warrants: Payroll Fund $ 303. 76 Commissioner Baxter moved to approve the warrants as presented by Mr. Warden. Commissioner Harbert seconded the motion, which carried unanimously. BIDS: PRESENT BIDS: No bids were presented. APPROVE KITCHEN SUPPLIES AND EQUIPMENT - ISLAND GROVE REGIONAL TREATMENT CENTER: Pat Persichino, Director of General Services, recommended acceptance of the low bid from United Restaurant Supply in the amount of $28,325.00. Commissioner Hall moved to approve said recommendation, and Commissioner Baxter seconded the motion which carried unanimously. 941 233 6e co/6 APPROVE COPIER MACHINE - HUMAN SERVICES DEPARTMENT (CONT. FROM 10/12/94) : Mr. Persichino indicated Human Services recommended acceptance of the third low bid from Lewan and Associates for the Sharp SF 8350 in the amount of $15,960.00, as discussed in a work session. Bill Edwards, Associated Business Products (ABP) , stated the company has worked with the County in the past and has done a fine job of service and support in the area. He stated he understood ABP did not get recommended based on surveys; however, he decided to attend the meeting to learn how to better serve Weld County in the future. Responding to questions from the Board and staff, Mr. Edwards indicated the local representative has done a fine job of service in Greeley, with a response time of four to six hours. He confirmed the service charge of .003 cents per copy would be honored for the first year only, and it would be .007 cents thereafter. Marilyn Carlino, Fiscal Officer for Human Services, indicated there were no problems with services from ABP; however, the trial period was to compare price and performance, and the Sharp rated higher in both areas. She confirmed the off-set catch trays, rather than the 20-bin sorter, were preferred, and the trays were not available from ABP. Mr. Persichino reiterated Human Services recommended acceptance of the Sharp SF 8350, in the amount of $15,960.00, from Lewan and Associates. Commissioner Hall stated he is still deliberating this issue; however, he moved to accept the low bid from Bratton's. Said motion died for lack of a second. Commissioner Harbert agreed this is a hard decision; however, she stated since the people who evaluated the machines will be the users, and there is only $1, 100.00 difference, she moved to approve the recommended bid for the Sharp 8350 from Lewan Associates. Commissioner Baxter seconded the motion and mentioned the problems with specifications. The motion carried three to one, with Commissioner Hall voting nay. BUSINESS: NEW: CONSIDER PURCHASE OF SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN HEALTH DEPARTMENT AND LARIMER DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN: John Pickle, Health Department Director, explained this agreement allows the two entities to work together in the areas of environmental and community health, and Weld County will provide laboratory services for Larimer County on a cost basis. On behalf of Commissioner Hall, Mr. Pickle confirmed the term of the agreement is from July 1, 1994, through June 30, 1995, and stated the services are on- going. He explained he worked with Bruce Barker, County Attorney, to update the agreement, which was previously open- ended. Commissioner Baxter moved to approve said agreement and authorize the Chairman to sign. The motion, seconded by Commissioner Harbert, carried unanimously. CONSIDER LETTER OF RENEWAL FOR CONTRACT FOR CHILD HEALTH PROGRAM BETWEEN HEALTH DEPARTMENT AND COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN: Mr. Pickle stated this contract provides for well child services and recommended the program be continued. Commissioner Hall moved to approve said letter of renewal and authorize the Chairman to sign. Commissioner Harbert seconded the motion, which carried unanimously. CONSIDER DIVISION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE STATEMENT OF GRANT AWARD FOR COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS, DRUG CONTROL AND SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN: Mr. Warden indicated Sharon Street, Community Corrections, is out ill; therefore, he stated this grant award allows the continuance of the current program. Commissioner Harbert stated she did not recognize any changes and moved to approve said statement and authorize the Chairman to sign. The motion, seconded by Commissioner Baxter, carried unanimously. Minutes - October 19, 1994 Page 2 941233 CONSIDER CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 FOR ISLAND GROVE REGIONAL TREATMENT CENTER WITH THISSEN CONSTRUCTION CORP. , AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN: Mr. Persichino stated this change order is the second one and reminded the Board Change Order No. 1 deducted over $44, 000.00 from the original contract amount. He explained this change order will increase the amount by $2,223.00 and indicated the specific items included. Mr. Warden confirmed that said change order met with B. J. Dean's approval. Commissioner Hall moved to approve said change order and authorize the Chairman to sign. The motion, seconded by Commissioner Baxter, carried unanimously. PLANNING: CONSIDER RE #1661 - MARKHAM: Chairman Webster explained to the applicant that since there are only four Commissioners present, in case of a tie vote Commissioner Kirkmeyer would review the record and cast the deciding vote. He also noted the applicant has the option to request a continuance. Glenn Markham, applicant, requested the Board proceed. Gloria Dunn, Planning Department representative, indicated one map is included for all three recorded exemptions, RE #1661, RE #1662, and RE #1663, and requested the Board consider RE #1661 and RE #1662 together since they are adjacent and for identical uses. Ms. Dunn read staff's recommendation for denial into the record and noted, prior to submittal of these two applications, discussion occurred with Merle Johnson, applicant's representative, concerning a minor subdivision, which staff did not support. She confirmed only a verbal response was received from the Town of Mead, indicating no objection, and stated the subject property is approximately two miles from the Town of Mead. Mr. Barker reminded the Board to keep in mind there are two applications being considered. Mr. Johnson indicated all three recorded exemptions are included on the sketch plan. He noted Mr. Markham has lived in this area north of the subject properties for 50 to 60 years and has no intention of developing; however, he would like to leave his property to his kids. Mr. Johnson indicated some of staff's comments are misleading and clarified, concerning contiguous land, Ed Markham, Mr. Markham's son, owns the adjoining land. He also clarified there is an historical access existing, and they intend to locate a 30-foot easement on the front of the properties along Weld County Road 3, with one common access to the north and south. He reiterated there will still be only one access and noted none of the contacted agencies had any objections. Mr. Johnson stated the requests meet all criteria for recorded exemptions and clarified the parcels were created prior to 1972, water and utilities are available, and the property is not prime farm ground. He also clarified two buildable sites already exist; therefore, two additional sites would be created, not four. He stated Mr. Markham's house is on Parcel #020 and there is an existing house on Parcel #019, both parcels being ten acres in size, and the rest of the surrounding ground is owned by Mr. Markham's son. Mr. Markham explained he initially sold 40 acres, which was broken into lots in 1969, due to financial reasons. He reiterated he has no intention of developing these lots for a number of years and stated he has a legal right to do what he is requesting. Mr. Markham confirmed that he purchased the lots back after they were split and indicated his son is now raising blue grass sod, with water rights from two different ditches. In response to further questions from the Board, Mr. Markham stated there is water flowing in underground drains and ponds have been created, which would be ideal if developed; however, he reiterated he does not intend to sell the lots unless it is financially necessary. He also stated if the lots were developed, they would continue to be used as agricultural on a smaller scale. Mr. Johnson reiterated that all requirements for recorded exemptions have been met. In response to questions from the Board, Ms. Dunn presented a prime farm ground map, as Exhibit A, for the Board's Minutes - October 19, 1994 Page 3 941233 review. Commissioner Baxter confirmed, according to said map, that both parcels are designated as prime. Mr. Markham noted, according to an old soil conservation map, that the ground was rated as #2 and #3, and it is only productive because it has been farmed and kept that way. He explained the irrigation process and stated it has been in sod since 1965 with an intense sprinkler system and is a family operation. He confirmed that Weld County Road 38, one mile west of Road 3, divides Boulder and Larimer Counties; however, Road 38 dead ends at Road 3. Mr. Markham also indicated the area is served by the Berthoud Fire District. No public testimony was offered. Discussion ensued concerning the number of small lots with dwellings in Section 32. Mr. Markham reiterated there would be only one access for all five lots and no additional accesses would be created. Commissioner Hall stated the requests are for a subdivision in disguise and are not compatible with the surrounding land. He also stated the Subdivision Ordinance requirements are being evaded and voiced concerns about road maintenance and water. Commissioner Hall stated the requests do not comply with the Comprehensive Plan or the Subdivision Ordinance and questioned total contiguous ownership of the land. He then moved to deny RE #1661. Commissioner Baxter seconded the motion and stated although it was stated the requests follow the criteria for recorded exemptions and the applicants wanted to complete the splits before they were no longer allowed, he feels the requests may better fit the Comprehensive Plan at a later time when the Town of Mead grows toward the subject property. He stated the Subdivision Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan must be strictly followed, and the two existing ten-acre buildable lots will create enough impact. Commissioner Harbert agreed with Commissioners Hall and Baxter and reiterated it would be best to keep only the two existing lots. Chairman Webster also agreed with Commissioner Hall's comments concerning creation of a small subdivision and suggested the applicants provide each lot with some water to prevent weeds. The motion then carried unanimously. CONSIDER RE #1662 - MARKHAM: This matter was discussed with the previous item of business, RE #1661. Commissioner Harbert moved to deny RE #1662 based on the same criteria as RE #1661. Commissioner Baxter seconded the motion, which carried unanimously. CONSIDER RE #1663 - MARKHAM: Mr. Barker reiterated the procedure in case of a tie vote, and Mr. Markham requested the Board proceed. Ms. Dunn entered staff's recommendation for denial into the record. She confirmed there is an existing house on proposed Lot A, and proposed Lot B would be a buildable lot. She noted the land is not prime farm ground; however, the long access easement is a concern, and the fact that proposed Lot A would be in the center of a large parcel is not efficient and orderly development. Mr. Johnson stated the applicant does not want to build on the 90 acres, proposed Lot B. He explained Mr. Markham's son lives on the four acres, proposed Lot A, and wishes to get a loan in his own name to pay off the house. Mr. Johnson stated all farming lies east of the house and the access road is located in the best possible place on the south boundary of the property. He explained the road was used for farming purposes before the house was built, but it has now been upgraded and they are proposing a 30-foot easement to the house. Mr. Johnson noted no agencies objected to this proposal and clarified the original split on the property in 1988 separated 6 acres from the 101-acre parcel. He explained the six-acre parcel was separated from the rest of the farm by a ditch and, after it was divided off, it was sold to a new owner who then built a home. He reiterated the house and road are existing and the son must acquire the four acres as a legal tract to get a loan. Mr. Markham explained his son lives on proposed Lot A, Minutes - October 19, 1994 Page 4 941233 but Mr. Markham owns the property and the home. He, too, reiterated his son wants a loan and the land in his own name. In response to a question from Commissioner Hall, Ms. Dunn said a subdivision exemption would not provide the son with ownership. Mr. Barker confirmed a recorded exemption is the correct way to obtain ownership. Mr. Johnson reiterated the house was built on non-prime land and the road was placed on the property boundary in an unobtrusive location. Discussion ensued concerning the shape of Lot A and the slopes and uses of the surrounding land. Commissioner Hall reiterated concern about the parcel being landlocked, and Mr. Markham questioned the term since there is a legal, accessible road to the parcel. He noted the home and road are located in the most sensible and reasonable place on the property. Further discussion ensued concerning the configuration of Lot A, and Commissioner Harbert questioned why the house was built for someone else. Mr. Markham explained there was a five-year waiting period after the time RE #1136 was approved to split off the six acres, and his son did not want to wait that long to build a home. Commissioner Hall voiced concern about the access becoming a problem if a non-cooperative landowner became involved. Mr. Barker clarified once an easement is granted, it can be extinguished only by the owner. Mr. Johnson stated other people use the road; however, there are other roads servicing the farm operation. He explained a private easement is proposed for maintenance purposes and to prevent conflict. Mr. Markham noted the accessibility of utilities and water off Road 38, and Mr. Johnson stated the utility easement would be designated on the plat. No public testimony was offered. Ms. Dunn presented proposed Conditions of Approval to the Board for review. Discussion ensued concerning said conditions and Mr. Barker suggested additional language for Condition of Approval #la concerning dedication for use of the 30-foot access easement, pursuant to the Subdivision Ordinance; adding a new Condition of Approval #lb concerning the 15-foot utility easement; and changing the original Condition of Approval #lb to Condition of Approval #ic, concerning ISDS regulations. The applicant agreed to all Conditions of Approval, including the changes and additions. Commissioner Baxter moved to approve RE #1663 for Glenn and Patricia Markham, with the Conditions of Approval as written and suggested by legal staff. Commissioner Harbert seconded the motion. Mr. Barker also suggested a note be placed on the plat concerning the maintenance of the access. Commissioners Baxter and Harbert agreed to include said suggestion in the motion. Commissioner Baxter also voiced concerns about the landlocked parcel; however, he understood why the house was built in that location. He stated further concern about creating a separate lot and allowing the right to build on Lot B, as well as the access creating potential conflict. Commissioner Baxter confirmed, however, that the proposal, as a whole, fits the criteria. Commissioner Hall indicated reservations since the proposal" fits some of the policies but does create potential conflict; however, he stated he will vote in favor of the motion and encouraged the applicant to record everything properly and work to create a good situation. Commissioner Harbert agreed with Commissioner Hall's statements, and the motion carried unanimously. RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES: The resolutions were presented and signed as listed on the consent agenda. There were no ordinances. Let the minutes reflect that the above and foregoing actions were attested to and respectfully submitted by the Acting Clerk to the Board. Minutes - October 19, 1994 Page 5 941233 There being no further business, this meeting was adjourned at 10:45 a.m. APPROVED: ATTEST:A)//��) /Aid BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ��17111 WELD COUNTY, CO ORADO Weld County Clerk to the Board W. . Webster, h ' man By: ' Deputy Clerk to the B rd_ Dale 7 Hall Geo ge Baxter Constance L. Matte t EXCUSED Barbara J. Kirkmeyer Minutes - October 19, 1994 Page 6 9412'33 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS MINUTES BOARD OF SOCIAL SERVICES WELD COUNTY, COLORADO OCTOBER 19, 1994 TAPE #94-40 The Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, met in regular session as the Board of Social Services in full conformity with the laws of the State of Colorado at the regular place of meeting in the Weld County Centennial Center, Greeley, Colorado, October 19, 1994, at the hour of 9:00 a.m. ROLL CALL: The meeting was called to order by the Chairman and on roll call the following members were present, constituting a quorum of the members thereof: Commissioner W. H. Webster, Chairman Commissioner Dale K. Hall, Pro-Tem Commissioner George E. Baxter Commissioner Constance L. Harbert Commissioner Barbara J. Kirkmeyer - EXCUSED Also present: County Attorney, Bruce T. Barker Acting Clerk to the Board, Shelly Miller MINUTES: Commissioner Harbert moved to approve the minutes of the Board of Social Services meeting of October 17, 1994, as printed. Commissioner Hall seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. WARRANTS: Shelly Miller, Acting Clerk to the Board, presented the warrants for approval by the Board in the amount of $49,264.46. Commissioner Baxter moved to approve the warrants as presented by Ms. Miller. Commissioner Harbert seconded the motion, which carried unanimously. Let the minutes reflect that the above and foregoing actions were attested to and respectfully submitted by the Acting Clerk to the Board. There being no further business, this meeting was adjourned at 10:50 a.m. APPROVED: ATTEST � BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS D/ ✓ WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County Clerk to the Board / U7J 1X/VA-I W.(' H. Webster, airman // Deputy Clerk to the.- Dale Hall, Pro- em C—citee000 r. e Baxter 2" Constance L. Harbert EXCUSED Barbara J. Kirkmeyer 944233 Hello