The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About931191.tiff RESOLUTION RE: DENY CHANGE OF ZONE FROM A (AGRICULTURAL) TO PUD (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT) PLAN FOR DAVID AND KAYLEEN HUNT, C/O BRIAN GRUBB WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the 17th day of November, 1993, at 10:00 a.m. for the purpose of hearing the application of David and Kayleen Hunt, c/o Brian Grubb, 1300 30th Street #E2-32, Boulder, Colorado 80303, requesting a Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) Plan for a parcel of land located on the following described real estate, to-wit: Part of the NW* and part of the SW* of Section 15, Township 6 North, Range 66 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado WHEREAS, at said hearing on November 17, 1993, the Board deemed it advisable to continue said matter to December 15, 1993, at 10:00 a.m. , and WHEREAS, at the hearing on December 15, 1993, the applicant was represented by Tom Hellerich, Attorney, and Brian Grubb, and WHEREAS, Section 28.8 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance provides standards for review of such a Change of Zone, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners heard all the testimony and statements of those present, has studied the request of the applicant and the recommendations of the Weld County Planning Commission and, having been fully informed, finds that this request shall be denied for the following reasons: 1. The Change of Zone is not compatible with future development as permitted by the proposed PUD District and plans of affected municipalities. 2. The proposal is not consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. a. The prime agricultural land is not being preserved and the proposal will cause interference with agricultural uses. b. The Board does not consider a change in farm-management practices to constitute grounds for farm land to become non-productive. 931191 PL0922 9to X22- ac ft ; Ht , /)//-4- CHANGE OF ZONE TO PUD - HUNT, C/O GRUBB PAGE 2 3. It has not been shown that adequate utilities and fire protection can be provided for the proposed development. 4. The street circulation system, as it relates to the County road is inadequate to provide safe and convenient arrangements for pedestrians, vehicles and loading, particularly school buses. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the application of David and Kayleen Hunt, c/o Brian Grubb, requesting a Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) Plan on the above referenced parcel of land be, and hereby is, denied. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 15th day of December, A.D. , 1993. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: WE" COUNTY, COLORADO ki-a147 Weld County Clerk to the Board V 7/fie' ' )6"tit Constance L./Harbert, Chairwan 0/ BY: Lai ,/-//J,tI.6- Deputy 4 Llerk to the Board W. We ster, Prq-Tem APPROV AS TO FORM: C orge Bax r ounty� Dale K. Hall Barbara J. Kirkme er 931191 HEARING CERTIFICATION DOCKET NO. 93-83 RE: CHANGE OF ZONE FROM A (AGRICULTURAL) TO PUD (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT) - DAVID AND KAYLEEN HUNT, C/O BRIAN GRUBB A public hearing was conducted on December 15, 1993, at 10:00 A.M. , with the following present: Commissioner Constance L. Harbert, Chairman Commissioner W. H. Webster, Pro-Tem Commissioner George E. Baxter Commissioner Dale K. Hall Commissioner Barbara J. Kirkmeyer Also present: Acting Clerk to the Board, Shelly Miller Assistant County Attorney, Lee Morrison Planning Department representative, Greg Thompson The following business was transacted: I hereby certify that pursuant to a notice dated October 11, 1993, and duly published October 28, 1993, in the Windsor Beacon, a public hearing was conducted on November 17, 1993, to consider the request of David and Kayleen Hunt, c/o Brian Grubb, for a Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) . At said hearing on November 17, 1993, said request was continued to December 15, 1993, at which time Lee Morrison, Assistant County Attorney, made this a matter of record. Greg Thompson, Planning Department representative, entered the unfavorable recommendation of the Planning Commission and the Planning staff's recommendation for approval into the record as written. Commissioner Kirkmeyer questioned whether the Planning Commission's Resolution was actually passed since the motion was denied. Mr. Morrison clarified the resolution should be corrected to state the resolution failed. Tom Hellerich, Attorney representing the applicant, stated David and Kayleen Hunt, applicants, and Brian Grubb, designer, were present to answer questions from the Board. Mr. Grubb explained the on-site conditions of the 95-acre tract which has a center-pivot sprinkler system, excluding the 18 acres to the south and 7 acres in the northwest corner which are to be developed. Mr. Grubb showed slides, Exhibit M for the record, of the property, the existing driveway, views of and from the property, Weld County Roads 70 and 31, and the proximity of residences and the two lakes. He stated there were 15 acres in alfalfa, which was surface irrigated, and the remaining was waste land. Mr. Grubb indicated there would be a maximum of 9 lots and explained PUD Zoning was chosen for flexibility in zoning and to create a high-quality neighborhood, with stricter zoning on the farm. He reviewed the criteria for this type of request and explained the consistency with the Comprehensive Plan, as well as the conformity of the uses to the performance standards of the PUD District and the compatibility of the use with the existing and/or future development. He also pointed out the existing faulty zoning, the adequacy of a public water system and approved septic systems, and approved adequacy of roads and accesses. Mr. Grubb requested the Board allow Mr. Thompson to read the staff's recommendation into the record to ease any concerns of the surrounding property owners. After discussion, it was determined said recommendation was part of the record and questions would be answered. Mr. Grubb stated the proposal includes 6 lots on the south, one of which exists, two lots in the northwest corner, and the farm, which range from 1.4 to 3.3 acres in size. Further questions from the Board were answered by Mr. Grubb, Mr. Hunt, Mr. Morrison, Mr. Thompson, and Mr. Hellerich. Mr. Grubb reiterated the fact that the request meets all applicable criteria and indicated this development would be an excellent alternative for Weld County to allow balance among economic development, land uses, and agriculture, and would also provide a conservation easement for the County. Charles Unfug, Attorney representing a number of adjoining neighbors and property owners, spoke in opposition of the proposal and submitted Exhibits N through P for the record. Natalie Johnson-Sena, Sonia Burron, and Wayne Leusink, surrounding property owners represented by Mr. Unfug, all spoke in opposition of the proposal. 931191 RE: HEARING CERTIFICATION - COZ FOR HUNT, C/O GRUBB PAGE 2 Let the record reflect a recess was taken at this time. Upon reconvening, Dwaine Kurtz, surrounding property owner, stated he is not represented by Mr. Unfug and did not sign the petition; however, he is opposed to this type of development as indicated in his statement, Exhibit J, which was submitted on December 13, 1993. Doris Carpenter and Joe Hoff, surrounding property owners, also spoke in opposition of the proposed development. (Changed to Tape #93-47. ) Mr. Hellerich rebutted the comments and questions from the audience and addressed their concerns. He submitted Exhibits Q and R for the record in support of his rebuttal. Discussion ensued among the Board, Mr. Grubb, Mr. Hunt, and Mr. Hellerich. Mr. Grubb submitted Exhibits S and T for the record during discussion. Mr. Hoff clarified for the record the property he sold to the Carpenters was less than Class IV soils and the property he owns is very productive farmland. Commissioner Webster stated he has looked at the property and the area in development, and he feels the land could be irrigated and farmed; therefore, it should stay in the agricultural capacity. He further indicated there is adequate water to farm and irrigate the corners and stated his concerns with the school bus access and the increased traffic and number of homes. Commissioner Webster then moved to deny the request of David and Kayleen Hunt, c/o Brian Grubb, for a Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) , based on the recommendation of the Planning Commission and the reasons stated. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Kirkmeyer who stated she agrees with Commissioner Webster and does not feel that simply changing management style changes production. Commissioner Baxter said he agrees that this type of development is probably not in the best interest at this time; however, he commended Mr. Grubb for his idea of new ways to zone. He indicated this type of development will probably happen in the future; however, he feels this is premature since the change in the Comprehensive Plan has not been completed. Commissioner Baxter stated he would vote in favor of the motion. Commissioner Hall indicated he still has a number of concerns and is not comfortable with the answers given at this point. He further stated the density and number of acres creates too dense a use, and the utilities and fire protection were not adequately addressed. Chairman Harbert said she agrees with the previous comments and feels the development across the road was not comparable because it was developed more than 20 years ago. After further comments, on roll-call vote, the motion carried unanimously. This Certification was approved on the 20th day of December, 1993. APPROVED: ATTEST: _ , �d_7 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS GG � WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County Clerk to the Board By: ganizff 4-at-- Q Constance L. rbert, Chairman Deputy Clerk to the Board W. H. bster, Pro- em b/ TAPE 1193-46 and 1193-47 X eor e Baxte DOCKET #93-83 Dale K. Hall PL0922 I Barbara J. Kirkme er d 931191 ATTENDANCE RECORD HEARINGS ARE AS FOLLOWS ON THIS 15TH DAY OF DECEMBER 1993: DOCKET #93-83 - CHANGE OF ZONE FROM A TO PUD, DAVID AND KAYLEEN HUNT, C/O BRIAN GRUBB DOCKET #93-84 - PUD FINAL PLAN, DAVID AND KAYLEEN HUNT, C/O BRIAN GRUBB DOCKET 1! DOCKET I! PLEASE write or print your name legibly, your address and the DOCKET # (as listed above) or the name of the applicant of the hearing you are attending. NAME ADDRESS HEARING ATTENDING ' /7/(4.7 / 33E'/v / 7 3 / 7 -3 3 milch( Hutt, Wisii, (Ad'et di 61S L3 ` izishl etzdF=,s !?'c erf44 )C' -' / 9-3- �13 �t (.P-1 i.T.. .1/K.cC� ��il �� 4.rr l✓', %'Y-.�u"%��: S %1 —I- 1 e/G -c c taL_ 3.37S/ac/C 3/ 6/z.ttt (f 2.3--S-c,3 9 )'I( _, Ae-e t /- 371 & of7 6id€ ice; (U ' Z5- ss 319-5 eY ,gdl �s/p,. ' (/3-Vie /fl7d Sat LV X93-�'3 /�// -,.te - ca ll '� // /r '39..7 ti &' c J."' 3) C-no & e >%- S. ,, c77? „ - -Zi '41ys 4 cif'/7, k,_4- .76-e<, 93- . (/ -mac L/i?{Z/ 22i / ii/Y“c.; iecr c--76-. -75_ .1-3 . i3- 931191 v\ �v vv : \ 4v \ ; \v, `a\` 1\\�.. \ vti \r . . \\ \ v. by �, - v` \ ' \'C•C\ \`� \w .\ \\•• vv .**:..:.;,:‘,..:i.:;:-:.:•..Tv ,s _\ ` k vv A et • \ ,` •%\ ` .';if i:::!%••• \ \\\� \\\v 4ti\\• tAirYdOtN '�`'.L.h v \ vv I \v \ \ \ Q • h \ • +� vh v v \ a vv vv v\ \"O\ . \\\1 + \ i+ �� \h4 \.. 'h\ Q\ vv V 1 ., vV\Qh A \ • ra \ v w\ '?� \i`:, !` v`a ',4 `i\�\\w\ \\ \ 4 4h 1. . .. $::4 w �♦ s 4�'Iv ar `�,. V AA's r.. : ` 4 EXHIBIT V • \ - 4 • ��,A\'-:•;;%-,<:::::::‘;::',..::::.'5.-- .. _ EXHIBIT ?arl- j ti-z.Crna.p) 51 3 ?v Z CIE prime farmland Prime farmland, as defined by the United States Hereford. The major crops grown are corn for silage and Department of Agriculture, is the land that is best suited grain, sugar beets, small grain, and dry beans. Alfalfa is to producing food, feed, forage, fiber, and oilseed crops. the principal hay crop. It must either be used for producing food or fiber or be The following map units meet the soil requirements for available for these uses. It has the soil quality, length of prime farmland when irrigated; however, Haverson loam, growing season, and moisture supply needed to 0 to 3 percent slopes, must also be protected from economically produce a sustained high yield of crops flooding to qualify as prime farmland. This list does not when it is managed properly. Prime farmland produces constitute a recommendation for a particular land use. the highest yields with minimal energy and economic resources, and farming it results in the least disturbance �� 1—Altvan fine sandy loam, 0 to 6 percent slopes of the environment. 4—Ascalon fine sandy loam, 0 to 6 percent slopes Prime farmland commonly has an adequate and 15—Bresser sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes dependable supply of moisture from precipitation or 17—Bushman fine sandy loam, 0 to 6 percent slopes irrigation. It also has a favorable temperature and length `. 23—Dacono clay loam, 0 to 6 percent slopes of growing season and an acceptable level of acidity or 29—Haverson loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes alkalinity. It has few if any rock fragments and is 30—Keith loam, 0 to 6 percent slopes permeable to water and air. Prime farmland is not _31—Kim-Mitchell complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes '• ` excessively eroded or saturated with water for long 34—Manter sandy loam, 0 to 6 percent slopes The to and is not flooded during p the growing season. 36—Manzanola clay loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes The slope is a more than i g t.qualify Soils that are 38—Nucla loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes _ evc-,�� g` s farmland a a hazard of flooding may rm for prime 40—Nunn loam, 0 to 6 percent slopes if flood s oli trot. can investigationb overome by eeded eoS 41—Nunn clay loam, 0 to 6 percent slopes such a i control. Onsite s is needed to 44—Olney fine sandy loam, 0 to 6 percent slopes C , determine 7 , extent acres,f this nearly5limitation. 46—Otero sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes About 765,409 or 54 percent of the survey area would meet the requirements for prime 49—Paoli fine sandy loam, 0 to 6 percent slopes farmland if an adequate and dependable supply of 54—Platner loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes irrigation water were available. At present, however, only 61—Stoneham—S ha finesandy loam, loam, 3 percent to 6s percent ce slopes about 14,000 acres, or less than 1 percent of the area, is sandy irrigated. The major irrigated areas are north and east of 75—Wages fine am, s sandy to 6 per, 0 to t slopes6 percent slopes the town of Pierce and northeast of the town of 77—Weld t� �{ Nv`1 E �`xk� I `V V„ --/ J. .mow 'atr a J s . - 921191 June 27, 1991 Weld County Department of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 EXHIBIT ifDear Sirs: I am discontinuing my farming operation and have contracted to sell 46.672 acres, more or less, located in the South 1/2 of the South 1/2 of Section 9, Township 6 North, Range 66 Vest of the 6th P.M. in Weld County. The boundaries of this parcel are Weld County Road 70 to the south, Weld County Road 31 on the East, the quarter section line northerly, and a natural drainage ditch known as the LaGrange Seepage Ditch, running in a southeasterly direction for the west boundary. Located in the southeast corner of Section 9, is a tract of land containing 1.99 acres, more or less, owned the Honorable Judge Donald A. Carpenter. As demonstrated on the attached surveys, the property I now own borders the Carpenter property on two sides. It is the desire of the Carpenter's to increase the amount of land which they own. This transfer would increase the Carpenter parcel from 1.99 acres to 48. 684 acres. Concurrently, the Hoff acreage would decrease from 61.041 acres to 14. 369 acres. No additional road access will be created and the property will remain in crop production. Title to the 46. 672 acres will be in the name of Carpenter Enterprises, a Colorado General Partnership. This partnership consists of Doris Carpenter and her two sons. For estate planning purposes, the Honorable Judge Carpenter will not be taking title to the 46.672 acres. As a result, this recorded exemption is being requested. This proposal is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan and the existing zoning district. The property being sold is in agriculture production and is intended to remain in production. The productivity of this parcel is poor. The majority of the soils are class IV. The 46. 672 acres being sold has 27 acres which has ' production that has been below the county average. The remaining acreage has little or no production ability. As delineated on the attached aerial photo, there is approximately 10 acres which is not productive for agriculture in any way. As stated previously, the Carpenter's intend to keep this property as a "greenbelt" for their existing home and lease the farm ground, or have it farmed on a custom basis. 931191 If in the future a home were to be built on this parcel, there is ample space on unproductive land to build a home and not change the existing crop production on the remaining land. Development could not occur east of the unproductive land due to an existing oil and gas well, and the fact that Colorado Interstate Gas has two 22" gas lines that run north to south across the property. Development west of the unproductive land is also not probable due to another oil and gas well, and the fact that the depth to water is less than five feet. I believe that this type of development is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive plan in that nonproductive land would be used for any future development. This property is currently unimproved with no plans for development. The smaller parcel will be comparable to other residential sites in this immediate area, with the existing crop production to continue. To the south of this property one-half mile, on WCR 31 are four residential acreages of 10 - 15 acres. To the north of this property, between WCR 70 and WCR 74, there are four additional acreages with similar type dwellings. These properties are farmed in much the same way as my own farm, with the land raising alfalfa hay or being used for grazing. Both Lots "A" and "B" will remain in its present state of crop production, which is alfalfa and grass. The property that I now own has one single family residence. The water tap is from North Weld Water District and the sewage disposal is a septic system. Upon approval of this recorded exemption request, the existing Use By Special Review would be vacated. The water supply for Lot "B" , if ever needed, would be from The North Weld Water District (See attached letter) , and sewage would be a septic system. The property under consideration for this recorded exemption is not located in a flood plain, geologic hazard, or Weld County Airport overlay district. I believe this parcel is located in the City of Greeley overlay district as it is within two miles of the extended Greeley City limits. Thank you for your prompt attention to this application. Should you have any question, please contact me. My phone number at home is 454-3713 and my office number is 352-1561. Sincere o Joseph A. Hoff JAH/ms 931191 April 7, 1993 FILE: 93-001 North Weld County Water District P. O. Box 56 Lucerne, CO 80646 Al i'tNTION: Lyle Nelson, Manager RE: Tap Request, Case No. S-325 Dear Lyle: • We have reviewed the request for seven additional taps in Hunter's View Estates located on the east side of WCR 31 approximately one-half mile north of Highway 392. The computer model of the distribution system indicates the existing 3-inch line in WCR 70 and the 2- inch line in WCR 31 could supply the projected domestic demand from the proposed residential taps with a residual pressure of approximately 50 psi. However, if the developer is required to provide fire flows, those lines are not adequate. In order to provide fire flows, these lines would have to be replaced with a 6-inch line from the existing 8-inch line in WCR 33 to the proposed development. Even if the developer is not required to provide fire flows at this time, the District should require the waterline within the development to be constructed as a 6-inch line. This would allow the District to supply fire flows at some point in the future when the off-site lines are replaced with larger lines. This would also protect the District from having to replace the lines within the subdivision at some later time when the surrounding property is developed. If you have any questions regarding the analysis, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely; EXHIBIT Thomas F. Ullmann, P.E. Principal The Engineering Co. i APR 1 3 1993 The Engineering Co. 2310 East Prospect Ft. Collins, CO 80525 Phone (303) 484-7477 Sa11J1 Petition Objecting to Planned Unit Development The undersigned residents, living in the vicinity, but beyond the designated 500' of the Planned Unit Development proposed by David & Kayleen Hunt, object to the PUD on the basis that it is not consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan and it is not compatible with the surrounding community. The undersigned agree with the recommendation of the Weld County Planning cwt. C.wwr will. lint Address Phone O& �. 3449Y wet 31 o A0 49-3 5 �.: E. �� 34459 W 31 Padi Co y5q -34150 Sala& /4w.b.4 . ISa71.{ wcg_ 7 4 4s4 - 3 is3s ie& ,4:h /5275/ ( cg 72 ‘ ,e o 5(73643S d/A 3y,8a eves(33 ,04esfr C. ySy- iguasa- 5701 Zc9CI 3/ Ea.Te+r 959 385'l x, 0 C,) 02 3 / & \ tiny 33s,Z JL it, a (_7(-& cati, a9 3 [90/ WC F2 3/ Afthl `ls- /",38S,6 /l'`/g(O 1,..)I /2_ 2y g y3el dya6 As ...2efft.e.„24,, �l A 3ys3y 14 ( 7�1i- ,2 it /�T i --3 4 fifer 3 ,�J�' c-�� 3 3 ____ lir, -,,/ Li_ Lk: 3 -3 --ci.-bi �x`,� \�1� Xh\�� c�C , 3 '-1rys'1 \ JLVR JAL\L. A IA`)\\- 3,( 3, � l-7 3bJ ' 3W CC?5) r-0•; '�j �y- '/f L��.‘ cn 4/.5-i -02O0, ✓ .....)dirtAi 3 --a cp j vac R 3, 331191 Petition Objecting to Planned Unit Development The undersigned residents living within 500' of the Planned Unit Development proposed by David & Kayleen Hunt, object to the PUD on the basis that it is not consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan and it is not compatible with the surrounding community. The undersigned agree with the recommendation of the Weld County Planning c� s. . Name Address DIME 3v,s/ wet 3/ Ysv-3713 ((Y�w,-Pct �t( / i .3SC2J / 14./Cie. 3/ ysy- 3 9 1,3 901191 - , Petition Objecting to Planned Unit Development The undersigned residents living within 500 ' of the Planned Unit Development proposed by David & Kayleen Hunt, object to the PUD on the basis that it is not consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan and it is not compatible with the surrounding community. The undersigned agree with the recommendation of the Weld County Planning Department. ame Address Phone 1/4_337� roda,3/ �54 -a 7'f3 Gr,_g ot ,, _ 3 3 7 57 w e 3 / On-et S9, 500/ j011402 S . R338_ [MCC 3 ( 351 - -+17.3 CSrcett-to CO D3t 3P3r otiCill 3 / 357 - 7173 Grcrk/ eo. 1O& 3 / ,,., 797• 77 u w e ,E 7 o �c Qa.e /�' -753 4 , SJ iaAri - /-5374' W 90 .�S6 -969/ ifiaL de 14.57 4,1,1/407c.t� Ca • &9 P63/ tcCellen. ' 3? 77 e/ / o ec.vvv.4 f `V\-02„,, t.t.t is i 9 3 � 70 ' -i:LaAst 352-2--6 S v 931191 Petition Objecting to Planned Unit Development The undersigned residents, living in the vicinity, but beyond the designated 500' of the Planned Unit Development proposed by David & Kayleen Hunt, object to the PUD on the basis that it is not consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan and it is not compatible with the surrounding community. The undersigned agree with the recommendation of the Weld County Planning Department. Name Address Phone ' 11+ ki1A.S•y\ /VS: / S/Ste- /%61& 0 7y,Q Pow 931191 s 004 ‘5%1 . Petition Objecting to \t Planned Unit Development The undersigned residents, living in the vicinity, but beyond the designated 500 ' of the Planned Unit Development proposed by David & Kayleen Hunt, object to the PUD on the basis that it is not consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan and it is not compatible with the surrounding community. The undersigned agree with the recommendation of the Weld County Planning pmemmt. ame Address Phone i)4 �. 34491 Wet 3/ � yo 4551-354ss etawi , E_ �ry 344/9.1 kk2&3/ pluwei Ca 1/51 -3g15C $. A& cove sdca Isar L\ Luce_ -7aa ,O 4s4 - 3 Las , /tAt isenef wcl 72 4 ,tip ,sv;343S azeilleMA Inn 4D4#f 3310y5/ 3ss�� - 670/ �.G,e tiste3/ E e� f�� 0 WC's 3 / fic li s-1/ 38S JL J 3[907 WC e 3/ 2-c- YSy--,38S}Ica_ -9,i,,, ' Al" -ig6 We '2 2 '/ c y3ei dya6 7-Al fie...242'1j' 3 '15311 -1,3 e R 33 11541-XIl 3 ,{J-� c. t.e 3 3 l'‘\ ,,,,vo .--N,Z.,4_,_,/:.)/:e"217,9 353 3Wcr? 3) tti•; '5-p eir9 „// 4ftsc) 3a-aa 5 WC R- 3, 931191 Petition Objecting to Planned Unit Development The undersigned residents living within 500' of the Planned Unit Development proposed by David & Kayleen Hunt, object to the PUD on the basis that it is not consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan and it is not compatible with the surrounding community. The undersigned agree with the recommendation of the Weld County Planning eimmmime!t . Name Address Phone wet 3/ Ysv-3713 ((aPt-,-.t,c oil/7/1 3y3s/ (A/C-4€ 3/ ysy- 29k3 931191 Petition Objecting to Planned Unit Development The undersigned residents living within 500 ' of the Planned Unit Development proposed by David & Kayleen Hunt, object to the PUD on the basis that it is not consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan and it is not compatible with the surrounding community. The undersigned agree with the recommendation of the Weld County Planning Department. ame Address Phone 91(44atitS9 ‘_337.57 02-0C. 3 / 05-6-d 7`71 �'� Ote-t-ter , 6057024,3/ ' ‘_337.57 Gz et go, 8003/ 3S-et -o7 C3 Jena.a. S . R338.) w cry 3 ( 351 - 3-17-3 &ee too CO eN03I 4 33P3C wc11 3/ 337 - 7173 Grcc %/ eo. PO& 3 / x,, ,,„. L"ate. 1`) c ,C' 7 O $6- 6 O 77 _AI ItA ' C 7° eO 3/ 4yAi 9j 46 /55741 W 70 .3'S1 -969/ AA* Co P463/ J j e /ter �- /s3 1 &)&' 70 _556 - 9- ,fie ea g°G3/--4/4.:gz, e /An-tart__ 339-77 aZeSe-k SI t;Prris g - 7-a,--71-12-0-7 - p „. A :-/./�8,.. @ "'�-i,tat. 15 1 9 3 4', 7c „ ti 4 A 352,6 S v k 931191 , im - - ,�-- ,, n a . . A o O., 4�_ // - .zs9-ia-- u1 Petition Objecting to Planned Unit Development The undersigned residents, living in the vicinity, but beyond the designated 500' of the Planned Unit Development proposed by David & Kayleen Hunt, object to the PUD on the basis that it is not consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan and it is not compatible with the surrounding community. The undersigned agree with the recommendation of the Weld County Planning Department. l/ Mn Address Phone 11 ,U 4s.-yt MSS / t1/41)C.017E 4/S1- ..JO V /(`i% e' /4/32W Gem ysV-aa 3 91191 B 1368 REC 02320021 01/29/93 16:46 15.00 1/001 T 1830 MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK a RECORDER WELD CO, CO AR2320021 WARRANTY DEED THIS DEED, Made this 29th day of January, 1993 between David M. Hunt and Eayleen J. Hunt of the County of weld and MATE KCJIIEluTART State of Colorado, grantor, and Steven S. Fisher and Anita A. Fisher Dots . S 3 D whose legal address is 2141 NW C street, Greeley, Colorado 60631 . _. of the County of Meld and state of Colorado, grantees: .. inning that the grantor for and in consideration of the sum of TRIER FIVE TNOOSAND Sim 00/100, ($36 .00) Dollars the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby eekewlodged has granted, bargained, sold and convoyed, and by these presents does _r great, bargain Sell, convey and confirm unto the grantees their heirs and assl s forever, not la tenancy in common but in joint tenancy, all real property, t r �k With improvements, if any, situate, lying and being in the County of Meld S State . ,� of Colorado, described as follws: �• -* Lot A of Corrected Recorded iwseption No. OS07-11-6-811667 recorded January 20, 1193 !. in Rook 1367 as Reception No. 02316772, being a part of the 11/2 of Section 11, Township 6 North, Range 67 Mot of the 6th F.N., County of Weld, State of Colorado r also known by street and number as Vacant Land, Weld County, Colorado • POPO> — with all and startles the hereditammats and appartnaaees Wrests Pi beisegiq, or la amities appertaining and the reversion and reversions remeiader sad •,,- rgmaisden, reate, issues and profits thereof, she all the estate, raps, , jN interest claim W demand whatsoever of the granter, either la Lew or equity, at, le sod to tks above bargained premises, with the hereditameets and appseteeaases. F*. . PO an APO TO SOLD the said praises abese bargained sad described, with the `z ,1 ee apeurtemans mate W ba grantees, their helms aid assigns forever. Sod the greeter, ) .Cde himself, his heirs and does personal representatives, ss oeanan vt, grant bargata t. _...w aargeseee to aud with the greeters, their ir heirs d assigns, that the at time et the , eremllag W delivery of these pnseats, he is well seised et the praises above . emmveF.4, has geed, sure perfect, absolute and indefeasible *flats of iabaritsnea, la _y ,-�lmm, In tee simple mad has goad right, full power sad lawful authority to gnat, -� ' bargain, wall sad ;waver the ammo in meaner and term aforesaid, W that the some an !rem W clear free all former and other grants) bargains, sales, liana, taxes, • assessments, ememmbranoes aid restrictions of whatever hind or astute sower, esoept • gensral taxes for 1993 and subsequent years; except easements, restrictions, c.;. covenants, conditions, reservations and rights of way of record, if any; t the grantor shall and will lawn AND MUM NGFEND the nine-bargained premises .IP- is the quiet she pnaosabie possession of the greaws, their heirs and assigast against ';r3 all aud every parent or persons lawfully claiming the whole er say part thereof. Ibs aiagules saber shall include the plural, the plural the singular, and the use e! as gender shall be applicable to all 'seders. IN MMTN= F the grantor has executed this deed on the date set forth above. aeC/7"-- t David M. Hunt • y�e nJ. C�AALl6f19 �Y �Jn J. Nun J. wn>J . "lt GTATE OF COLORADO ) . se. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me County of Weld ) this 29th day of January, 1993 by OsTiq'M:.Wnt'god Kayleen J. Runt —, y ,r I. ''H, Witness my hand and official seal. - III /, lI My commission expires July 10, 1991 i .. L4L%r fs r rm..f , Sd`a a dC .0-a".".101,........1 _. • NOTARY MIMIC . . 1113 Tenth venue EXHIBIT No. 9311. Rev. 3-66 Greeley, COLORADO 60631 v IT "mar 91111. 1 , ,:sti .. 4f.i - b y:J f B 1402 MSC 02351377 09/21/93 16:02 115.00 1/003 }4 F 1977 MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK A RICORDER WELD CO, CO '_' WARRANTY DEED 'S 4 AR2351377 tae oWao, nude this 1•ce day o: September, 1993 batv+an BATE DDCll )Q David K. Hunt and layleen J. Bunt Odle r A. , . t $ J ,OO of t e County of Weld and . ,'.,. hate of Colorado, grantor, and ' ,,; Walter C. Pixley and William C. Pixley and Margaret H. Bensinger 4*5 fi :Jr whose legal address is 34701 Meld County Road 23, Moran, Colorado 00544 ,. ri K• ', '6.-70$ the . County of Weld and State of Colorado, grantees, ,c_.,•:.. , ;MUM that the greater for as& la eeeablaretloe of the ems of not SDI= Peat • �'7aC.SSWA� 00[100, (qd0,000.00) Sellars�t the receipt sad eaffielesey et alai la Y A,4; ed0ed, Ms granted, ha.gara.c, sold and , Why thew peeeeeM� 4,S r . hatgaeet "all, yasocay sad asoflet La jade*the g their heirs all reel , • La la adosn hat L iy aced , ry .: 711;%,/...- ' •th , if soy, •lteete, lying eel beteg the awe et ram M :; t .,�,r�R"" Nees el ill i tede•arlhed a. tallwnt •^ ✓ i. SIML.MISFR eh. Mat PTO AN WID* A MR? MlOF 4 �5: : •Itedw by,street and tabor ea 34701 Wald County toed 23, Maranon, Co- lon d 4 .-.7 ; n t r ek} ?y .'c �,,.� t. . . H .'.:.< aa'aaaM.�;te�•eWa,r '... < ..i'C+ `yy;.. �' e�1er';mad the re er•lau 7sd.:Marshes •"rrsalBMr and I .r•r, ry mad Dan t,,sad all the,estate,. . , • ,...as'x.� .h.teeevaer'et-the gearter, Saw L Me it " tr,.ef, 1a ;,r, i at. ) "^'^ ' eh.lr slrs'a a.e(�1[t�rlgR ettagew t wseasr. •.t r•-•.. a Si weeireetattees allereetill, al aim a- s ir !•..,le ... ._1'.“"••.•-• . .r.y .., an Saw W7.at Mabee rl eeei Via!-e—{,--tales, neat.-tewi . . } iYd e! Ben Mat se Bette MMr,.. . w- A _ s .^"21J10. . '.1 Starer Hemp:yeas s,..renrutlsY•it-•, ��'• " ,arT..,kr �- > end rights ed ion of regard, u ern ' ,-,...,•••,...--., -:',41...-.7.4. 11,:**_, . f�:.. e:'. 4 °cv ti F 4. • r k f: yaat,�..... 41.*;• ash . . a' K j • ., vF yr ,V iv ' 0.N.f; F''F+F '�l.Y� L ' !' .aa "V- ..**CE.: + •1 . • �'f� -.7.41,•,41/-,-4,# • lap ::A 4• 'et. ti'J�y„ 4. ..- l ., „ r a -.- 0”. . > •,t a, :k'd.+. '•�:.'1:J'.gP'go'�Jt,5 _ ;, i •n w t e,',,,}Yr . ," TI l u .Fgt dF.._ f ` `1, ' u.. t a,F__/gslowetaasia_ rasa 1', ' '>f,�Y ewe} ��eetjajes'3aafally ela/alee tad the he Miele a anyert.thaa.se. ,t r i> •310;,` a fetid lM1Me tM plural,`the: plalalAYe elheleti Jnd,thg.w a[ fs` , � ;,�fR�a/ y .the�pe.Nsr lam s[esuW � .r tb ante Hesse r*1r,, • 1/44.p..- . �•... . is ;+ r - II. It /Je fry Je Tom, , .. , .i '�' 1 ipdhCIWDD / ma. The Seagoing leSEiaoaa w bhaeWlnAtN bataes nit ` , yam Canty et Wald` ) this 16th day of Mp._Ine: lSU 1, ; I'3 'kn, ...0 ' • +.4 } hya/ntd. . Ms: lad lsyleen J. Neat - f * k it"-i's 'i,Y': Vitae.. M Mail W s!llelal seal. 'e1 +. 'I },as ;i/ • my ucalaelea ogtrss July 10, MR L .c\'4. - ,t) 4.},:I,'.� 'ti ti l{r...d ' ellMAI,iY• lbaio?. — '�� 1111 saRth Avows ` nMe. MI,. grenley, COLORADO OONl - r 9c 91 t rot. . .{ . ' B 1 : PBC 02351377 09/21/93 16:02 _5.00 2/003 F 1976 MARY ANN FEUEPSTEIN CLERK 6 RECORDER WELD CO, CO ' 'L ' ' *BORON NO.: 6032601 }'. DATE t September 16 1993 = • eEX![IBIT A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION . el'' - `' PARCEL 1: #Lot'E ok Amended Recorded ncsaption Mo. 0607-11-1-811075, recorded ..iii .4; 22{ 1992 in Rook 1363 as Reception No. 07315562, being a part et �' '••tbe NE114 o!t Motion 11, Township 6 North, Range 67 West of the 6th 9.M., ,, 4..,a y: t.,410uaty of Weld, State of Colorado; .. . ,..,y.l • t t _of enzin:tb Raoorded Exemption N0. .0607-11-6-RE1667, recorded ` ,�� • ,, ,� 20, 1993 is Eoaak 1367 as Reception Mo. 02316772, being a Cast of e',` fl/2 offt„Notion'11, Township 6 North, Range 67 lest of the itb 9.M., _ • , :,of Weld,;Statsof Colorado. u ,:' ',I- ;40-_,... } • ,,. . i pastel of asrtl being part of Let 'Bo ef;Carraateatt - sv.,. 77 lKawardingthe Veeld 30, 1C95p2�.tiny;�.at1367 ✓ a r'"°�;-"� of.tint Win/t of.Esetlon li,;Terasllip }}0�.•� t.ecant. t woad skate of colors:o owl k :i;r• 57..71-S,“.r rO�proilovo{� 4 �i _, >_4J'5+# ^ ,s -2. �w st- ri Btan:lar+S.' ditaapee >� x "tv' na.. jr- 096 viffi,*a.fdotioe Ocarbervam- Ito:-'y--'.:,-,,,,;\.:.._?`. "•'"y ' .... • :qW.•s/;iaanRaated bye rtloonat•N sbas , Y-- . �_.r w.a �s..4-tS-r'h y�/�n�O�rMibb F!.er '44 _aor:4L . i. -4071 y stein rekttiw taamo t\ .., • r.a r Ra. 4\ fin' q � T r .. _._a _ .l . ' c ��i1Mlt� t7Mt• �*JAN '..+,. TRar y' • ¶ $r ' " W ; ont rti. :s �-.. a , , , e • .b„aa,�•,ay,e�, r t/A! nW*•7 OJesp I • ts. ' - ;a'eince41". • 'tt . tbilei 1finent e) ) hereinafter i 71,1 „t..44,...«�rz ire% id Ii1►s to`sai4c"�. , u� iiiny j.-1 I R a9' Mt,T1fi36S fradius 1s 1290:00 feet; tAroaa ,t , t. • 47 dpraa140-a1natee it,evaaa6-, .and abeam long"thmad . r, • �'..tc 'ar 45 degrees 10 -ainutsa Meet t distaaof Ot j ' t r `: • '' 9.t$kf5Ytl tt . '-IPi �.„. I. 1 . S4 t •14. 4.!'� ..., i '''',..s.,!;;',.; ''' . .. ., 'r tyt _```a ' r .x i St., x ..\t.. ( ,Saft1� da9rw O ,minutee af_reoealO ••Rmat shag a . 1q... . / �Sbcn-t{ amt to the afc6osaid ate a.dintanee Of'=62!:63 • `,.,, � 'point ea pee test lino of said MEl/6. bmaid poilht'being; � .,; f Wnr01N ientedi • 't 471 , , • t end •r b �y( �1 A `t - • Jr"- ;,:tr.' .• - Booth 00 fdsgrsss 15 minutes 00 6eeoads Rut aiea4 ss,� _ ny-, ` '' ' tt, r- ��yef`R6ginnilq 1/6 a'distenee Of /07.45 feet to the rani 4r. ;a2 Oe.lSM baaarpart Of Let 'a' of Corricted atoabetiaa47,4..-.4!-Li.44 ' .}lN'P1 '1447•w�,�dea Januiry.SO f:1993.1 a.e 1367 ai MOIMt$S 'A"' 0)1219778 etille'reeerds of thrlsw 0emffi► tick ant on leava' t-; "++�'�,' 'f•N 'tbe4WR1/tiodtleatiOn 13 tontsh i Marth, naaM ‘. �rpwatY 71)71 Nail EtaN 6�e6aerNe and MO, { 1y uaealMtJSIOOS11W5a '' w".) . . r • r i• 7 a+4 ,« X44.4.:4 . -:t fl'7 • d• W-. tt a:41 i ,-n ay 4 '•t , �, p, a •t „ *.'• w'i' s a.:. }�� f•f a . -.: . . a./. . t ,a .. v N>.t.. .. - \ +ft . .{t. •�i .. . . ..a'. > .. , Be • ginning at the Quarter Corner common to Section 11/12-T.6N.-R.67N. as • sonumented by a found BLit type standard monument stamped as per BLW instructions and JONES LB 22098 with the Section Corner common to . / Sections 1/2/11/12-T.6N.-R.67w. as monumented by • found /4 sober which :" was removed and replaced with a set 30" of /6 rebar with a 3 1/4" Diam. aluminum cap stamped as per BLN instructions and JOKES IJ 22098 to Mar North 00 degrees 18 minutes 00 seconds Nest (assumed) • distance to 2638.00 test with all other bearings contained herein relative thereto: ,' fit Thence North 00 degrees la minutes 00 seconds Nest along the the East line of said NE1/4 a distance of 85.74 feet to the .4. •+: True Point of Beginning. Said point being unsonumentedt . /2' Thence leaving said East line South 89 degrees 42 minutes ) , . 00 seconds West • distance of 30.00 feet to • point on a . curve and also being a point on the Masterly Right-Of-Way (BOW) line of Weld County Road (VCR) /23. Said point being 4 ---f42, aamusnted by • eat 24" of /4 rebar with yellow plastic cap I . '' . ''74:1 . stamped 301( 8 L8 22098. Said Monument Type (NT) hereinafter .''`fit.*.' referred to as NT/1. Aforesaid line being non-tangent to said oi 1 . ., , . #3: Thence along the arc of a curve which is concave to the southwest :3',+ tip' ..,a distance of 1152.58 feet, whose radius is 1390.00 feet, whose ; .- .:rdelt• is 47 degrees 30 minutes 34 seconds, and whose long chord -.Ai:- :Seats Worth 4$ degrees 50 minutes la seconds West • distance of 1.,'`' 119.85 feet; ',�'`s {X /4 t.T mane Math 59"degrees OS ascends minutes 39 asces last along • line - • s -Quail is nen-tangent to the aforesaid curve a distance of 529.43 r . test 4:0C-point on the East line of said 111/4. Said point being 05 .,Son South•00 degrees la minutes 00 seconds last along the 2,i-flat line of said 111/4 a distance of 717.55 feet to the True r, ._, ' ""Point of Beginning. ,{ _ . ' i, B 1402 SSC 02351377 09/21/93 15'02 $15.00 ER CO,0003 r?� l 1979 MARY ANN PEDERSTRIN CLERK 6 BBOORD •, >• f, - . . a d 1 ' • 1 2 91191 G. , 0x22\2112 ,cat_M. • e • - 11292 An 02242!12 03/14/91 16,01 *S.00 1/001 \/ T 1149 MAY ANN rrO*889Z1x CLARR L wawa is MLLD CO, CO SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED . THIS DEED.mewls 1st .,... Ranh .w 91 gyig pptylmMMsry Fw: imam m ds Ogle 1 Syr.... old Norgiecn, doing business as Do , city sand Co. at CaM)M Ford .ba MI:0116e gain“. David W. Hunt and Eayleen J. mint, in j')int tenancy weld .►..,. 15877 Weld County Hold ar. . Weton, Colorado *0615 ak Weld ra nee.. Ia 5v wm4ETv.The erpa..e a.aa..._..__amen..of►t n o. Teo Hundred Eighty rise Thousand and no.'100 - -"Oulu ay.. •roe,aS.een .fa..anr.w rlask.g.J.be �,aN.kepi ee..ial.si,,d.alI.Sew pe..J.ea pa. Hap•el-,awn at wain wa pal heir *'Si awn mete I t el pµn).epee•di sae, It se.eau.Ft,r War b Y l'...... Weld .sue N Coen... toedesalled a heft. lot I, Recorded Exemption Re. 0607-11-1•il1075, recorded April 12, 1988 in nook 1192 as Reception no. 2137589, bolus a portion of lot I, Recorded Exemption No. 0607-11-1-RE271, recorded August 25, 1977 in look 806 as Reception No. 1728404, being a part of Ilu ME1/e and the SE1/6 of Section 11, Township 6 North, Range 67 West of the th P.N., County of Weld, state of Colorado. TOGETHER Wifll any and all water rights ":emaciated with maid property including but not limited to 1S0 shares of the Co.p Reservoir, all right, title and interest in irrigation wells and/or their replacements, deersos by Independent Well Priority eel E.N. as Well 16&51, '-*11 52 68668, RM66P renlecement well, Well 03 6867, together with pans, auto's and any other irrigation eguinaent and any other ditch rights, earring rig is and storage rights that ere in connection with said property de Mon y.eaa al mew a: Ilia TDOEnta unseal art ee eras.r eeaaa: r..•flare.a a a,-uw a11aaaar.a a arms a s erase.arede al. ....wa..war+ar per awn•.ad M de r4 .n{N.wk.,a,wt ales al dal seen r pewee eke a bones.ape).t b aI w at Oa Masi lam..N a r.a.wre al appeeessew. 1O NAVE.00 TORSO er mid pr e.See lweaWae Jr.Sod se et gpwr'a.ems et porn.. their hrw Si ales Men Tr pasee k. hiaw+e1 . his war elpwve epesa.e..w saw...deg amassed weds he IS me re We RANT Me Peale OtEtNIMbe aM..Meese prom sense gel meet*p.wr.eder palm.. their war.raaip,.apnea al.en Femme epmacla.ag lsalt e a Fri Swat M.•rep a erecter pan.. M WTnius altklal Or pee.,55 estme es:Si a die Sr M..e Ear x •. . Harold worgison, going Dullness as Dodge City Sand Co. HANGS su7E v 00$91110 r Omar M FORD Tr bme•ee•seam a a.a.k}J Fla se r. lit d.M March .1191 . b Rrold Norgison, doing business as Lodge City Sand Co. • 5.a..a sal Si Meal,nal rcnue.t a. PAUGH N..e.aa apes Decl�beS lj. 1994 l •• X,ber PUBLIC Marline R. Rough •1 •a a Oren mew TO r: Mo.Mlle M. elemL I aaaan • em aaa,rnwie.On a le.4..1OMPle-,s.oe- -.Y November 17, 1993 Weld County Board of County Commissioners CIE ': 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Subject: Hunter' s View Estates Dear Commissioner' s: I am the property owner east and adjacent t¢ the south end of David Hunt' s farm. I am one of two property owners that have land adjacent to the 6 lots proposed at the south end of the development. I have no objections to Mr. Hunt' s proposal as presented. Sincerely p Arts, 5 or(,il�cti CNev vok Keith Burman, President Burman Chevrolet Vi?i.17i1 ell- 2 /PC' h'c '.'Ore11:91 NOV 15 '33 09 :47 J W STOCKOVER CPA PAGE 2 November 15, 1993 Weld County Board of County Commissioners 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Subject: Hunter' s View Estates Dear Commissioners : My mother, Lucille P. Stockover, and I, as trustee of the William M. Stockover Testamentary Trust, own the property south and adjacent to David Hunt' s farm. we have no objections to Mr. Hunt 's proposal as presented. Sincerely, R.,- a (-ate" James W. Stockover /z. ; tit_ 1, c)e{, 94111191 DWAINE D . KURTZ 33693 WCR 31 ' 7 GREELEY COLO . 352-20't`± TO; WELD COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 12/15/93 ' WELD COUNTY CO . RE; HUNTER ' S VIEW ESTATES , P .U .D . CHANGE OF ZONE AND FINAL PLAT I DO NOT SUPPORT THIS APLICATION FOR ZONE CHANGE ON LAND ACROSS WCR .31 , EAST OF MY PROPERTY . THE CREATIVE ENTREPRENEUR EFFORT TO DESIGNATE AS MARGINAL LAND ACCORDING TO THE LENGTH OF AN IRRIGATION PIPE SYSTEM WOULD BE A DETRIMENTAL PRECIDENT IN ZONING OF WELD COUNTY . IF THE WIND DRIFT OF THE SPRINKLER IRRIGATION SYSTEM BEING USED AS A BASIS FOR THIS REZONING WERE TO INVADE THE RIGHTS OF THESE PUD OWNERS, COULD ANOTHER 100 FEET OR 100 YARD RADIUS BE DRIED UP AND THEREFORE BE DECLARED MARGINAL AGRICULTURE LANDS AND SUITABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT? THE FUTURE WOULD INCLUDE THE OPTION BY THE LAND OWNER OF LOT 9 , CURRENTLY IRRIGATED , TO BUILD A RESIDENCE BY SHORTENING OR REDUCING THE ARC OF THE SYSTEM ALLOWING ADDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND POTENTIALLY OTHER SUBDIVIDING TO FOLLOW ON LOT 9 . HARDLY THE ZONING SCENARIO I ENVISION FOR RURAL WELD COUNTY . THE ADJACENT " ESTATE TYPE PARCELS TO THE WEST" REFERRED TO IN THE APPLICATION INVOLVE 60 ACRES WITH S HOMES . THIS IS NOT A HIGH DENSITY USE THAT WOULD FACTOR IN JUSTIFYING PROPOSED USE OF ADJACENT AGRICULTURE LAND WITH LOT SIZES OF 1.'i TO 3 .i ACRES . P . 1 of 2 Cli 'f //L • z_36 (e-1c �-) 9:3191 NO EVIDENCE OF ACCESS TO IRRIGATION WATER IS INDICATED FOR THE BENEFIT OF INDIVIDUAL LOTS OR THE COMMONS AREA . THIS IS DETRIMENTAL TO A DENSITY OF USE THAT INCLUDES "ANIMALS AND LIVESTOCK" WITH "CORRALS BARNS , AND OUT BUILDINGS" . THE DEVELOPER MUST CONVEY WATER RIGHTS FOR ACREAGES OF THIS TYPE AND PROVIDE FOR IRRIGATION ACCESS AND USE TO BE CONSISTANT WITH RESIDENTIAL USE IN THIS AREA OF THE COUNTY . I DO NOT BELIEVE "DRYLAND" ACREAGES FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPEMENT IS THE HIGHEST AND BEST USE OF THE PROPERTY . YOU WILL ALSO NOTE ACCESS TO THE SOUTH DEVELOPMENT MUST CROSS THE GAS PIPE LINE TO GREELEY WITH NO ALTERNATE ACCESS AVAILABLE . THE NOTHERN DEVELOPMENT REQUIRES ACCESS TO THE HIGH SPEED AND HIGHER DENSITY TRAFFIC OF WCR 31 . NEITHER ACCESS IS FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE POTENTIAL OWNERS OR THE PUBLIC . THE SITE PRESENTS NO UNIQUE FEATURES , EXCEPT AS CREATED BY THE OWNER , TO ALLOW FOR PUD ZONING CONSIDERATION . AGRICULTURE USE TO THE SOUTH SHOULD BE IDENTIFIED AS CATTLE FEED LOTS WITH RECOGNITION OF THE CONFLICT BETWEEN RESIDENTIAL ZONING AND THIS ADJACENT AGRICULTURE USE . I RESERVE RIGHTS FOR COMMENT ON CHANGES MADE IN THE APPLICATION , IF , ANY SINCE THE DENIAL BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION . I REQUEST DENIAL OF THE PUD APPLICATION FOR HUNTER ' S i VIEW ESTATE . �` DWAINE D KU P .2 of 2 9 1191 A.. EATON SCHOOL DISTRICT RE-Z BOARD OF EDUCATION WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATION Mary Lou Carsten, President 36 Cottonwood • P.O. Box 8 • Eaton, Colorado 80615 William E. Powell,Superintendent (303) 454-3402 Richard Johnson,Asst.to Supt. Keith McIntyre, Vice-President Manuel Jimenez, Princ. H.S. Margaret Schafer,Secretary Richard Johnson,Asst. Princ. H.S. Kenneth Sudduth, Princ. Middle School Russell Meeker,Treasurer Oren Nero. Princ. Eaton Elem. Walter Jeffers, Princ.Galeton Elem. Jan Kreps. Vice-Secretary Dennis Herzberg,Athletic Director November 15, 1993 TO: Greg Thompson, Weld County Planning Dep ent FROM: William E. Powell, Superintendent SUBJECT: Summary of phone conversation notes from Tuesday, November 9, 1993 As per our telephone conversation today regarding the Hunters Estate project, following are notes I took last Tuesday in a conversation I had with Brian Grubb. You requested me to send you a copy of my notes. Brian Grubb [786-1661] (re: called Supt regarding the Hunters Estate project -- Brian wanted to know if Greg Thompson from Weld County Planning Office had called Supt-- Brian had not called -- Brian wanted to know if the Supt and Board thought there was to be a house put on lot 9--Supt indicated he remember lot 9 to be designated as agriculture, and the other 8 lots were to be designated PUD -- Brian tried to plant the idea that a house was to be built on all 9 lots, based on preliminary drawings, including the large circular section designated as agriculture-- Brian indicated Dave Hunt was going to transfer development rights to the home owners for 30 years -- after 30 years lot 9 could be developed as the Weld County Planning Board would then approve -- Supt indicated this explanation was not given to the Board at the meeting with Dave Hunt, and this is a new interpretation put on the explanation of the 9 lots -- Brian says that the Weld Planning staff is under the impression that the town of Greeley and the RE-2 School Board both do not want any houses on lot 9--the Supt indicated that was the impression that RE-2 has, and he could not speak for the town of Greeley-- Brian is trying to argue that all 9 lots were to have at least one house built on them, including lot 9 -- the number of lots evidently is going to be negotiated down by the Weld Planning Commission, and Brian wants the schools to say they agree with 9 lots with 9 houses, so that the number negotiated down will not hurt the project economically -- the Supt indicated he would be glad to speak with Greg Thomspson from the Weld Planning Office if he calls, and the Supt will tell Greg that the schools do not want to jam up the housing project, however, the Board was under the clear impression that the large circular lot 9 was going to be undeveloped and be designated as agriculture -- Brian said even if it is designated as agriculture, it still is eligible for one house). 1] T v � 71993 ' No weld county Planning J� �� MEMBER OF NORTH CENTRAL ASSOCIATION SINCE 1914 9n1 11 /=xh ; b tx J Rider & Woulf, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW Steven R. Rider it in J✓ tt "� BRANCH OFFICES Francis W Woulf - Beverly L Edwards 11246 E.Mississippi Ave. 518 N.Nevada Ave., Suite 303 Jeffery O. McAnallen Aurora, CO 80012 - Colorado Springs, CO 80903 David R.Lacey 303/750-2303 719/634-4877 Charles 5. Unfug Fax. No. 752-0946 Fax. No. 634-1902 Christine J.Law Nora E.Roth The Greeley Building Of Counsel: November 16, 1993 710 11th Ave., Suite L30 Michael L. Pederson Greeley, CO 80631 303/353-0524 Fax.No.353-0945 Weld County Planning Weld County Commissioners Department Centennial Building North Greeley County Office Greeley, Colorado 80631 Complex Greeley, Colorado 80631 Re: Hunter's View Estates; Request of Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) Dear Sir or Madam: We represent a number of neighbors of this proposed development, who are opposed to it. One of the neighbors, Judge Donald A. Carpenter, who lived across the street from the proposed development, died this weekend. His funeral is scheduled for 11:00 a.m. Wednesday, November 17, 1993. This is in conflict with the hearing before the County Commissioners on this matter which is scheduled to begin at 10:00 a.m. that same day. His widow, Doris Carpenter, and many neighbors who knew him well, are in mourning. Mrs. Carpenter and the neighbors had planned on appearing in opposition to the Hunter's View Estates PUD. Under the circumstances, we would request that the consideration of the Hunter's View Estate Re-Zoning and PUD be tabled until the next scheduled meeting of the County Commissioners. If you have any comments or questions with regard to this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, RIDER & WOULF, P.C. Gree y Office arles S. Unfug Attorney at Law CSU:ddg cc: Brian Grubb, Hunter's View Estates RWF:B/8A001 • (7(' ; �c; f/(; ,n�<<- 191 November 16 , 1993 Weld County Board of County Commissioners 915 Tenth Street Greeley , CO 80631 Subject : S-343 and Z-483 for Hunter ' s View Estates Dear Commissioners : On behalf of the task force , I would like to express some concerns regarding the above mentioned cases . The task force and the Board have discussed the need for consistency in the process , and it appears that the way this proposal is being handled could jeopardize the consistency and integrity that exists. Dave Hunt submitted a sketch plan application to the Planning Staff back in the spring of this year . The planning staff , the Health Department and Engineering as well as outside referral agencies all reviewed the proposal and found that the project either met or could meet their criteria. Dave proceeded to prepare an application for a Change of Zone and a Final Plan based on the favorable recommendation from the staff and more than a dozen referral agencies . He submitted those applications to the Planning Commission in September . All the referral agencies responded to the Change of Zone and Final Plan with a recommendation for approval or conditional approval . Dave has agreed to meet all of the conditions. The planning staff ' s recommendation was for approval . According to the staff , the project is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan , the Zoning Ordinance and the Weld County Subdivision Regulations . There is P,ot h' no e l Fe that a developer can do. It appeared that all nf the criteria had been met. However , when the proposal was presented to the Planning Commission , they were heavily influenced by some surrounding property owners that are against any type of development in Weld County . In a split decision , the Planning Commission recommended that the case be denied . The Board is scheduled to hear the Hunter ' s View Estates case in the month of November . The task force members have concerns about the precedent that may be set in the event that this proposed development is denied . If a project meets all of the adopted criteria then on what basis may it be rejected? Si erely , L/ X`ertt e s`tom 11 THE SIGN SHALL BE POSTED ADJACENT TO AND VISIBLE FROM A PUBLICLY MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF- WAY. IN THE EVENT THE PROPERTY UNDER CONSIDERATION IS NOT ADJACENT TO A PUBLICLY MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, THE APPLICANT SHALL POST ONE SIGN IN THE MOST PROMINENT PLACE ON THE PROPERTY AND POST A SECOND SIGN AT THE POINT AT WHICH THE DRIVEWAY (ACCESS DRIVE) INTERSECTS A PUBLICLY MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SIGN POSTING CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER THE PENALTIES OF PERJURY THAT THE SIGN PROVIDED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES WAS POSTED ON THE PROPERTY AT LEAST 10 DAYS BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS HEARING FOR CASE ii . " 5Kg.5 THE SIGN WAS POSTED BY: . : NAMETI )S14 U e's ERSON POSTING SIGN SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. COUNTY OF WELD ) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO ME THIS DAY OF LVQ.1V.k1-O� , 19 1� K f .. SEAL :` f� . ...... l Cil +, t •at OTARY PU I MY COMMISSIg EXPIRES ,1��,.L ""l0101 • (�2 LAST DAY TO POST SIGN IS: n�,Q(K�v�_� , 19 "j ,.J. PLEASE RETURN THIS FORM TO THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES' OFFICE ON OR BEFORE THE DATE OF THE HEARING. 91191 Exh/h(/P= SUMMARY OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING October 5, 1993 Page 4 Bud Clemons moved Case Number USR-1032, Basin Operating Company, be forwarded with the amendments to Development Standards #3 and 14, be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with the Planning Commissions recommendation for approval. Motion seconded by Richard Kimmel. The Chairperson asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Richard Kimmel - yes; Ron Sommer - no; Juliette Kroekel - no; Bill O'Hare - no; Shirley Camenisch - yes; Marie Koolstra - yes; Bud Clemons - yes; Judy Yamaguchi - yes. Motion carried. Bill O'Hare left at 10:45 a.m. CASE NUMBER: Z-483 APPLICANT: Hunter' s View Estates, c/o Brian Grubb REQUEST: A Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NW4 of and part of the SW4 of Section 15, T6N, R66W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: Southeast of Weld County Road 70 and Weld County Road 31. Brian Grubb, representative for David and Kayleen Hunt, gave an overview of the surrounding land uses, which includes a small lake, a couple of residences, a large reservoir, and a cattle operation. On-site at this time is a center-pivot sprinkler that covers 65 acres of the property. The concept behind this proposed development is to separate the less productive agricultural land and utilize the views. Bud Clemons asked Brian to show him how much of the property the sprinkler covered. Brian showed him a large arc that covered most of the property except the corners. Judy Yamaguchi asked the percentage of acreage farmed. Brian said 65 acres would remain agricultural. The Chairperson asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak for or against this application. Charles Unfug, Attorney, representing surrounding property owners, stated their opposition. The main concern is this proposal takes up prime agricultural land. He said the sprinkler was not there three years ago and this is an abuse of the Planning Unit Development process. The surrounding property owners feel David Hunt has artificially created corners with the pivot sprinkler. Another concern was a school bus stopping in the area because the road is on a steep hill so there is a safety concern for children. Joseph Hoff, Sonya Burron, Wayne Luecing, and Natalie Sena all had concerns about the loss of agricultural land. Increased animals that would threaten livestock, and concern for school bus safety stopping under the brow of the hill. _ 9 ;1191 SUMMARY OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING October 5 , 1993 Page 5 David Hunt, applicant, said several State organizations are encouraging water conservation. The center-pivot sprinkler uses 60% less water than flood irrigating. Brian Grubb said he did not have any objections to the Department of Planning Services' staff comments. He also said there were no objections or concerns from the referral agencies except the Eaton School District and the City of Greeley who were both concerned about the future building on proposed Lot 9. Richard Kimmel moved Case Number Z-483, David and Kayleen Hunt, be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with the Planning Commission' s recommendation for approval due to the fact this is in the Overlay District. Motion seconded by Ron Sommer. The Chairperson asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Richard Kimmel - yes; Ron Sommer - yes; Juliette Kroekel - no; Shirley Camenisch - no; Marie Koolstra - no; Bud Clemons - no; Judy Yamaguchi - no. Motion denied. Bill O'Hare arrived at 11:50 a.m. CASE NUMBER: S-343 APPLICANT: Hunter' s View Estates, c/o Brian Grubb REQUEST: A Planned Unit Development Final Plan LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NW4 and SW4 of Section 15, T6N, R66W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: Southeast of Weld County Road 70 and Weld County Road 31. Brian Grubb provided a similar presentation as the above case with added information about the size of the proposed homes (2,000 sq. ft. ) and the option to allow Lot 9 a buildable agricultural site. Ron Sommer moved Case Number S-343, be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with the Planning Commission's recommendation for approval. Motion seconded by Bill O'Hare. The Chairperson asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Richard Kimmel - yes; Ron Sommer - yes; Juliette Kroekel - no; Bill O'Hare - yes; Shirley Camenisch - no; Marie Koolstra - no; Bud Clemons - no; Judy Yamaguchi - no. Motion denied. 931191 BEFORE THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Moved by Richard Kimmel that the following resolution be introduced for passage, due to the fact this is in the Overlay District, by the Weld County Planning Commission. Be it resolved by the Weld County Planning Commission that the application for: CASE NUMBER: Z-483 APPLICANT: David and Kayleen Hunt, c/o Brian Grubb ADDRESS: 1300 30th Street #E2-32, Boulder, CO 80303 REQUEST: A Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) to PUD (Planned Unit -� Development) . LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NW4 and part of the SW4 of Section 15,,�T6N, -- R66W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. Ia LOCATION: Southeast of Weld County Road 70 and Weld County Road 31. be recommended favorably to the Board of County Commissioners for the following reasons: 1. The submitted materials are in compliance with the application requirements of Section 28.5 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 2. It is the opinion of the Planning Commission that the applicant has shown compliance with Section 28.8 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: The proposal is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. The proposed PUD District is located within the urban growth boundary areas of the Town of Eaton and the City of Greeley. The Town of Eaton reviewed this request and found it did not conflict with its interests. A City of Greeley representative reviewed the Greeley Planning Commission comments from April, 1993 concerning the Sketch Plan for this proposal, and reiterated comments which addressed the Sketch Plan. The uses permitted by the PUD District will be compatible with the future development as projected by the surrounding zone district. The PUD District and conditions of approval insure compatibility with existing uses on adjacent properties and within the PUD. The uses allowed in the proposed PUD District will conform with the performance standards contained in Section 35.3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. North Weld County Water District will provide domestic water service to the PUD District. Individual sewer disposal systems will be used to serve the residential lots of the PUD District. Aihi f 9. 1191 RESOLUTION, Z-483 David and Kayleen Hunt Page 2 Weld County Road 31 will provide access to the PUD District. Portions of the Planning Unit Development district site are located in the A-P Airport Overlay District Area. Structures located in the Overlay District shall conform to the regulations of this district. No other overlay districts, special soil conditions, or commercial mineral deposits are known to be located on the subject site. This recommendation is based, in part, upon a review of the application materials submitted by the applicant, other relevant information regarding the request, and responses from referral entities. The Planning Commission' s recommendation for approval is conditional upon the following notes being placed on the amended P.U.D. District plat prior to recording. 1. Uses allowed in the PUD District are identified by Lot and shall comply with uses allowed in the Weld County Zoning Ordinance for Estate and Agricultural zone districts, unless otherwise stated on the PUD District plat or PUD Final Plan plat. 2. All streets within the PUD District are private and shall be built to County standards. The private road system proposed as part of a PUD plan is subject to review by the Engineering and Planning Departments and approval by the Board of County Commissioners. All streets within the PUD District shall be maintained by the homeowners association, lot owners, or developer. 3. North Weld County Water District shall provide the domestic water supply to the residential uses. 4. Individual sewer disposal systems shall provide adequate sewer to the residential uses. 5. Animal bulk requirements for various species of livestock and domestic animal requirements shall be established as part of the PUD Final plan submittal. 6. Installation of utilities shall comply with Section 12 of the Weld County Subdivision Regulations. 7. There shall be no outside storage of equipment, boats, recreational vehicles or automobiles. 8. The two areas of open space shall be maintained by the homeowners association or the developer. 92,1191 RESOLUTION, Z-483 David and Kayleen Hunt Page 3 9. Each lot shall be permitted to have no more than 1 accessory structure, which does not exceed 1200 square feet. 10. Before obtaining a building permit, the Architectural Review Committee shall offer their approval of the proposed structure. 11. A qualified soils and foundation engineer shall both design and supervise the construction of all building foundations. The engineers report shall be submitted with any building permit applications. 12. All PUD plans shall comply with the requirements of the Eaton Fire Protection District, Eaton School District (RE-2) , Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, and Sheriff's Department. 13. Prior to recording the plat, the plat shall be amended to include the recommendations made by the Utility Board in their meeting of September 23, 1993. 14. Fifty feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Weld County Roads 70 and 31 shall be reserved for future arterial roadway use. 15. The plat shall be submitted within 15 days of approval. Motion seconded by Ron Sommer. VOTE: For Passage Against Passage Richard Kimmel Juliette Kroekel Ron Sommer Shirley Camenisch Marie Koolstra Bud Clemons Judy Yamaguchi The Chairperson declared the resolution passed and ordered that a certified copy be forwarded with the file of this case to the Board of County Commissioners for further proceedings. CERTIFICATION OF COPY I, Sharyn Ruff, Recording Secretary for the Weld County Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing resolution, is a true copy of the resolution of the Planning Commission of We ' County, Colorado, adopted on October 5, 1993. �a'-d the 5th of Octobe ' , 1993. Sharyn F u Secretary 9:1191 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS David and Kayleen Hunt Z-483 The Greeley Planning Commission had concerns about: 1. The two northern-most residential lots, and requested they be removed from the project. 2. The areas in the project should be increased or dwelling units decreased so that the density ratio is not over one unit per acre. 9:1191 INVENTORY OF ITEMS SUBMITTED FOR CONSIDERATION Applicant: David and Kayleen Hunt Case Number: Z-483 Submitted or Prepared Prior to Hearing At Hearing 1. Application 14 pages X 2. 2 Application plats X 3. DPS referral summary sheet and letter X 4. DPS letter to applicant X 5. DPS Recommendation X 6. DPS Surrounding Property Owner/Mineral Owner Mailing list, letter and certificate. X 7. 3 DPS Maps Prepared by Planning Technician X 8. DPS Notice of Hearing X 9. DPS Case File Summary Sheet X 10. DPS Field Check X 11. Exhibit A, Petition objecting to PUD within 500' X 12. Exhibit B, Petition objecting to PUD outside 500' X 13. Exhibit C, surrounding property owner concerns X 14. Exhibit D, Letter from Eric Hoff X 15. Exhibit list X 16. Eaton Fire Protection District referral response dated September 29, 1993 X 17. Colorado Oil and Gas Commission referral response dated September 21, 1993 X 18. Eaton School District RE-2 referral response dated September 22, 1993 X 19. Army Corps of Engineers referral response dated September 20, 1993 X 20. City of Greeley referral response dated September 16, 1993 X 21. Weld County Health Department referral response dated September 15, 1993 X 22. Weld County Engineering Department referral response dated September 10, 1993 X 9a11.91 INVENTORY OF ITEMS David and Kayleen Hunt Z-483 Page 2 23. North Weld County Water District referral response dated September 7, 1993 X 24. Town of Eaton referral response dated September 8, 1993 X 25. Planning Commission sign posting certificate dated September 23, 1993 X 26. Letter sent to applicant with insufficient addressX 27. Copy of envelope sent to applicant X 28. Letter opposing PUD from surrounding property owners X 29. Planning Commission Recommendation to Board of County Commissioners X I hereby certify that the 29 items identified herein were submitted to the Department of Planning Services at or prior to the scheduled Planning Commission hearing. I further certify that these items were forwarded to the Clerk to the Board's office on October 8, 1993. frAkl---- Current an STATE OF COLORADO ) COUNTY OF WELD 1 SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS day of Q C�� 19 SEAL ARY�BLIY My Commission Expires c7 ' 351C 9;;1191 EXHIBIT INVENTORY CONTROL SHEET Case Z —yf3 • eLG& 94- X-1GL 1/140-n " C.j/2..4- �i�t 61—) Exhibit Submitted By Exhibit Description /0/ A. k L Lit t4Ltt A l�c'.tc-oi^1 %vl�f B. �"1-Q 12.924; Gt //2-t)62 /-1, if Cin S /1)/f c. /24.--g-41-4--)1-y(071771--6.;7z. t'si)/116in d comp-2e-- 7d_d_ 132_ 0/// D. e. �? Z f e-d7d j OZc2- D/ 14ir'/7f /.La-y--Y'u�.2 674'ly1'LGQ t' r mnepile60A-vy hF. f"14 n n/ �t�f a n.� azeym-1 /4, G. kh lj7 veier e7”5,/2, zulze//Y/S l it -u 5�/r11 ?7774/hu Ai/se_4_ /A H. C /arle S /L7 5 (ht, zr„--62O , pp ,6z .�to) ) / C n/ e,„„)..e4.4.4.6.4„ Uhl tOL io . Igo-cis , FL-4 -Tu�v l.'," /�i" . /q /�j. deria, we. ,47,1"9/2 e's&,e-rt- / K. 0141711;',,3 =-C-/C C//re e.A. /1-4t-e/L p _zuiy2-et-4,e- % L. /�C N. �. IA, I 1 • P. 1 ! Q. • R. S. 1 c vv T. U. V. w. x. Y. z. EXHIBIT LIST David and Kayleen Hunt Z-483 A. Petition objecting to Planned Unit Development within 500 feet. B. Petition objecting to Planned Unit Development outside 500 feet. C. Surrounding property owners concerns. D. Letter from Eric Hoff 3°1191 Kist .7tizI OFFICE OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PHONE(303)356-4000, EXT.4200 WI FAX(303)352-0242 C. 758 P O BOX 632 GREELEY, COLORADO 80632 COLORADO October 11, 1993 David and Kayleen Hunt c/o Brian Grubb 1300 30th Street, #E2-32 Boulder, Colorado 80303 Dear Mr. Grubb: Your application for a Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) to P.U.D. (Planned Unit Development) has been recommended unfavorably to the Board of County Commissioners by the Planning Commission. The legal description of the property involved is shown as part of the NW* and part of the SWg of Section 15, Township 6 North, Range 66 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. If you wish to be heard by the Board of County Commissioners, it will be necessary for you to indicate your request by signing the bottom of this letter and returning it to this office. Regular hearing procedures will then be followed. This includes publishing a Notice of Hearing in the legal newspaper, an expense to be paid by you. In order to proceed as quickly as possible, we must receive your reply by November 12, 1993. If we are not in receipt of your request by that date, the matter will be considered closed. Sincerely, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Let- Constance L. Harbert, Chairman CH: ld cc: Weld County Department of Planning Services I/we, `4((j _ t1l{,! /o/h 93 , do hereby request the Board of County Co tisioners t review the above mentioned application. cr544 91 _' /6 77- ,x Brian Grubb 1300 30th Street #E2-32 Boulder, Colorado 80303 Phone (303) 786-1661 October 6, 1993 Department of Planning Services � RS7 �= Attention: Chuck Cunliffe "i - j Weld County Administrative Offices OCT 0 6 1993 1400 North 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 Weld County Planning Subject: S-343 and Z-483 Dear Mr. Cunliffe: On behalf of David and Kayleen Hunt, I request that the Department of Planning Services Staff forward the above cases to the Weld County Board of County Commissioners as soon as possible to be scheduled for the next available hearing. Sincerely, Brian Grubb J1 1-d ci.tit-r LAMA-- 17.6,1•1 b rJEpf l s ftJCh i-rS 9G;1191 DWAINE D . KURTZ 33653 WCR 31 GREELEY COLO . 352-20'x'4 TO ; WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION WELD COUNTY CO . RE ; HUNTER 'S VIEW ESTATES CHANGE OF ZONE AND FINAL PLAT I DO NOT SUPPORT THIS APLICATION FOR ZONE CHANGE ON LAND ACROSS WCR . 31 EAST OF MY PROPERTY . THE CREATIVE ENTREPRENEUR EFFORT TO DESIGNATE AS MARGINAL LAND ACCORDING TO THE LENGTH OF AN IRRIGATI❑N PIPE SYSTEM WOULD BE A DETRIMENTAL PRECIDENT IN ZONING OF WELD COUNTY . IF THE WINO ❑RIFT OF THE SPRINKLER IRRIGATION SYSTEM BEING USED AS A BASIS FOR THIS REZONING WERE TO INVADE THE RIGHTS OF THESE PUD OWNERS, COULD ANOTHER 100 FEET OR 100 YARD RADIUS BE DRIED UP ON THIS SPRINKLER AND THEREFORE BE MARGINAL AGRICULTURE LANDS AND SUITABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT? THE FUTURE WOULD INCLUDE THE ❑PTION OF THE LAND OWNER OF LOT 9, CURRENTLY IRRIGATED, TO BUILD A RESIDENCE BY SHORTENING OR REDUCING THE ARC OF THE SYSTEM ALLOWING THAT ADDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND POTENTIALLY OTHER SUBDIVIDING TO FOLLOW . HARDLY THE ZONING SCENARIO I ENVISION FOR RURAL WELD COUNTY . THE ADJACENT " ESTATE TYPE PARCELS TO THE WEST" REFERRED TO IN THE APPLICATION INVOLVE 60 ACRES WITH 5 HOMES . THIS IS NOT A HIGH DENSITY USE THAT WOULD FACTOR IN JUSTIFYING PROPOSED USE OF ADJACENT AGRICULTURE LAND WITH LOT SIZES OF 1 .'- TO 3 .H ACRES . 7774/_\.7 91191 NO EVIDENCE OF ACCESS TO IRRIGATION WATER IS INDICATED F❑R THE BENEFIT OF INDIVIDUAL LOTS OR THE COMMONS AREA . THIS IS DETRIMENTAL TO A DENSITY OF USE THAT INCLUDES "ANIMALS AND LIVESTOCK" WITH "CORRALS BARNS , AND OUT BUILDINGS" . THE DEVELOPER MUST CONVEY WATER RIGHTS FOR ACREAGES OF THIS TYPE AND PROVIDE FOR IRRIGATION ACCESS AND USE TO BE CONSISTANT WITH RESIDENTIAL USE IN THIS AREA OF THE COUNTY . I DO NOT BELIEVE "DRYLAND" ACREAGES FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPEMENT IS THE HIGHEST AND BEST USE OF THE PROPERTY . YOU WILL ALSO NOTE ACCESS TO THE SOUTH DEVELOPMENT MUST CROSS THE GAS PIPE LINE TO GREELEY WITH NO ALTERNATE ACCESS AVAILABLE . THE NOTHERN DEVELOPMENT REQUIRES ACCESS TO THE HIGH SPEED AND HIGHER DENSITY TRAFFIC OF WCR 31 . NEITHER ACCESS IS FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE POTENTIAL OWNERS OR THE PUBLIC . THE SITE PRESENTS NO UNIQUE FEATURES, EXCEPT AS CREATED BY THE OWNER, TO ALLOW FOR PUD ZONING CONSIDERATION . I REQUEST DENIAL OF THE PUD APPLICATION FOR HUNTER 'S VIEW ESTATE . DWAINE D KURTZL / 1_3 OCT 0 4 1993 Weld County Planning /d4/1/N ? 91191 t' r "I It; c.4 •• l IN o a3&g -- /it • m o W on e us w vRa. 4 N ea LI- O . v 1� ti O .0 M 0 LI M d4 • 3.4 ,O ti O ,0 U Jam.) - VJ V O $-I ULU b mom Q Uw pa r-i gat NOM O Co I.L. • C7O Z al ZR CC J ~ o 514 CL Z m w 11 2 DYE-�.,,f `r P" H. oz0 w d ,; a fit"+ Z S O �i i y CC 0 la Q p zw ., 'C W w o Q • y_ L. • if a • :. �0 • Ida' 921191 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE(303)353-3845, EXT. 3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 140C. GREELEY, N ORAAVENUEO631 COLORADO 80631 COLORADO D E C IVE E OCT 061993 I September 3, 1993 4VeldCounty Planning David and Kayleen Hunt c/o Brian Grubb 1300 30th Street Boulder, CO 80303 Subject: Z-483 - Request for approval of a Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) on a parcel of land described as part of the NW4 and part of the SW4 of Section 15, T6N, R66W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. Dear Mr. Grubb: Your application and related materials for the request described above are complete and in order at the present time. I have scheduled a meeting with the Weld County Planning Commission for Tuesday, October 5, 1993, at 9:00 a.m. This meeting will take place in the Weld County Centennial Center, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado. It is the policy of Weld County to refer an application of this nature to any town or municipality lying within three miles of the property in question or if the property under consideration is located within the comprehensive planning area of a town or municipality. Therefore, our office has forwarded a copy of the submitted materials to the Eaton and Greeley Planning Commissions for their review and comments. Please call Gary Carsten (Eaton) , at 454-3338 and Hank Epstein (Greeley) , at 350-9783 for information regarding the dates, times and places of these meetings and the review processes. It is recommended that you and/or a representative be in attendance at each of the meetings described above in order to answer any questions that might arise with respect to your application. It is the responsibility of an applicant to see that a sign is posted on the property under consideration at least 10 days preceding the hearing date. Sometime prior to September 20, 1993, 1993, you or a representative should call me to obtain a sign to be posted on the site no later than September 25, 1993. The sign shall be posted adjacent to and visible from a publicly maintained road right-of-way. In the event the property under consideration is not adjacent to a publicly maintained road right-of-way, the applicant shall post one sign in the most prominent place on the 91191 Brian Grubb 0TA'C +� Z-483 p 6 1993 OC Page 2 i property and post a second sign at the pitweet at which the driveway (access drive) intersects a publicly maintained road right-of-way. Your sign posting certificate must be returned to the Department of Planning Services' office on or before the date of the hearing. The Department of Planning Services' staff will make a recommendation concerning this application to the Weld County Planning Commission. It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact the Department of Planning Services office a few days before the date of the hearing to obtain that recommendation. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to call me. Sincerely/ 1 ------ Greompson Current Planner 931191 THE SIGN SHALL BE POSTED ADJACENT TO AND VISIBLE FROM A PUBLICLY MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF- WAY. IN THE EVENT THE PROPERTY UNDER CONSIDERATION IS NOT ADJACENT TO A PUBLICLY MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, THE APPLICANT SHALL POST ONE SIGN IN THE MOST PROMINENT PLACE ON THE PROPERTY AND POST A SECOND SIGN AT THE POINT AT WHICH THE DRIVEWAY (ACCESS DRIVE) INTERSECTS A PUBLICLY MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY. PLANNING COMMISSION SIGN POSTING CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER THE PENALTIES OF PERJURY THAT THE SIGN PROVIDED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES WAS POSTED ON THE PROPERTY AT LEAST 10 DAYS 2 1/.53 BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING FOR CASE # THE SIGN WAS POSTED BY: NAME OF PERSON POS NG SIGN and ca lad SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. COUNTY OF WELD ) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO ME THIS r27),J DAY OF , 19 q9). I Is,,• SEAL 01A 14 J. '•. NO BLIC MY COMMISSIORrERPTRES yKL i1 _Q-1) 5Q ^1/ tW, J1 LAST DAY TO POST SIGN IS: J/n Jl. €. 4 , 1901 •. PLEASE RETURN THIS FORM TO THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES' OFFICE ON OR BEFORE THE DATE OF THE HEARING. 31191 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF COLORADO SS COUNTY OF WELD rill" ill" I, KEITH HANSEN, of said County of Weld,being duly �1 tsrc sworn,say that I am publisher of rho Coomm1lnlfl M • wpao t gt%vr S, ° WINDSOR BEACON a.m. for ale PyrPM• of A Zone'OM PUD -(Planned nn a weekly newspaper having a general circulation in said Denlepm+gtl County and State, published in the town of WINDSOR, Mlle a in said County and State; and that the notice, of which tar, 'd° the annexed i a true copy, has been published in said weekly for 7 _successive weeks, that the notice � s was published in the regular and entire issue of every�,p number of the paper during the period and time of Pmtd/ publication, and in the newspaper proper and not in a Is Sot cantritit i b supplement, and that the first publication of said notice was in said paper bearing the date of the TYPE d INTENSITY or PROPOSED USE:CMDSI � to zee Sam A { day of p)� , Al)., 19 and t000 P (Planned the last publication bearing the date o£the tWeld CCIOO�Nt:,,Spoous1dMyo end Southeast of Weld°meaY"roda+. day of , A.D., 19_ and so: 9nZes woes.Men or that the said WINDSOR BEACON has been published Yas continuously and uninterruptedly for the period of 5 The public lasting will be consecutive weeks,in said County and State, prior to the held In the We County Commissioners'Hearing date of first publication of said notice,and the same is a Room.o Flriinniltb.ocesH,, newspaper within the meaning of an Act to regulate 915 T OrMmy. Colorado. c ements or printing of legal notices an advertisements, approved *neon,HYMN to the above ngus�et�SMlpuld lilt: May 18, 1931,and all prior is ar as in force. weld ingWASsitted nNN. m el / Weld •rata 1.09 N• 17th lreeud ,OrNI Y. Cobradc awrp.babm N above date ar emed m P LISHER the public hawing on October 5.1997. available fir reolloWohtee Subscn d a d sworn to before me this :I / . /._ day omt P°wmhq Services,1400 of 19 19��'3 N.11th Avenue,Ornlcy. Colorado Belowlensbo5w°°. t—/4tAN-/ (7C . /L-14r A 99Msttl• NOTARY PUBLIC Ch mow ies yew My commission expires /996' PublbhM Yl 9semo'r 0.9' ~ ir d co 5 1993 \\ yVe1dG®untYpannln9 1\3\lrat921191 (itp DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303) 353-3645, EXT. 3540 C WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICESN. 17TH AVENUE GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 COLORADO September 3, 1993 CASE NUMBER: Z-483 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from David and Kayleen Hunt for a Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) . The parcel of land is described as part of the NW4 and part of the SW4 of Section 15, T6N, R66W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is southeast of Weld County Road 7O and Weld County Road 31. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by September 17, 1993 so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Greg Thompson, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: 3. X We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. a re er t e closed letter. Si ed: Agency: TOWN OF EATON 223 First Street gAfr P. Date: P. O. Box 946 ® E C Eaton, Golorac:u auu SEP 7:593 ;NW r"nro1,111. ("est DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303) 353-3845, EXT. 3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 140C. EY, N. ORAAVENUEO631 GREELEY, COLORADO80631 COLORADO September 3, 1993 CASE NUMBER: Z-483 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from David and Kayleen Hunt for a Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) . The parcel of land is described as part of the NW4 and part of the SW4 of Section 15, T6N, R66W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is southeast of Weld County Road 70 and Weld County Road 31. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by September 17, 1993 so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Greg Thompson, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: 3. We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our .0..X ` interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. P ease ref t the enclosed letter. Signe • Agency: /then,Ilia.° ' COO alj9-� C9 .`7 . / Date: /p 7 S Ordiggr SEP 9 1993 1 Weld?Tilling it; DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES 1111De PHONE(303)353-3845, EXT. 3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 1400 N. 17TH AVENUE GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 COLORADO RECEIVED SEP 0 7 1993 September 3, 1993 CASE NUMBER: Z-483 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from David and Kayleen Hunt for a Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) . The parcel of land is described as part of the NW4 and part of the SW4 of Section 15, T6N, R66W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is southeast of Weld County Road 70 and Weld County Road 31. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by September 17, 1993 so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Greg Thompson, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: 3. `-►' We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. . A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. 'n Please refer to the enclosed letter. Signed: 11/pyt��fO (P Agency: 557 """YYY C�' Date: - ID-R3 SEP 1 1993 rr� Weld PnIpnty Planning 9:1191 mEmoRAnDum Greg Thompson, Current Planner To Weld County Planning Date September 15, 1993 COLORADO prom Jeffrey L. Stoll, Director, Environmental Health 01:7 Subject: Case Number: Z-483 Name: Hunt, David and Kayleen Environmental Protection Services has reviewed this proposal; the following conditions are recommended to be part of any approval: 1 . No permanent disposal of wastes shall be permitted at this site. 2. Fugitive dust shall be controlled on this site. 3. The maximum permissible noise level shall not exceed the residential limit of 55 dB(A) , as measured according to 25-12-102, Colorado Revised Statutes. 4. An I.S.D.S. Evaluation on any existing septic systems will be necessary, prior to issuing the required septic permits on the existing systems. 5. Individual sewage disposal systems are required for the proposed homes and shall be installed according to the Weld County Individual Sewage Disposal Regulations. 6. The Division requires that this facility utilize existing public water supply. 7. Individual Sewage Disposal System permits must be finalized and approved by an Environmental Protection Specialist within one (1) year of the application date. 8. All construction activities that disturb more than five (5) acres will be required to obtain a stormwater discharge permit from the Colorado Department of Health, Water Quality Control Division. 9. An Air Pollution Emission Notice and/or Emissions Permit is required for construction activities disturbing more than twenty-five (25) acres and can be obtained from the Air Pollution Control Division, Colorado Department of Health. JLS/483.Z SEP 1 G 1993 c5 - Weld reedy Planning 9 ,1i91 F COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT r D Clty 1000 10TH STREET, GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 (303) 350-9780 Greeley September 16, 1993 LI5 8EP 2 11493 Li Greg Thompson, Current Planner n1N Weld County Department of Planning Services 1400 North 17th Avenue Greeley CO 80631 Dear Greg: Case No's. Z-483 and S-343 Hunt Change of Zone and PUD Final Plan Thank you for the referrals for the Hunt change of zone and PUD final plan. Because the submittals do not appear to have changed since the March 1993 sketch plan submittal, the City of Greeley's comments will be substantially the same. I will, however, try to clarify some of the points which were discussed in the Greeley Planning Commission April 27 meeting. In April, the Planning Commission found that the proposal is not in conflict with the City of Greeley's Comprehensive Plan but that it does not meet the intent of. Resolution 7, 1985. Resolution 7 was specifically adopted to address the recorded exemption referrals which were being received by the Planning Department beginning in 1985. However, it has been discussed by the Planning Commission that Resolution 7 may also apply to other subdivision requests within three miles of the City of Greeley. It is still the Planning Commission's position that "the overall gross density on any subdivision not exceed one dwelling unit per 20 acres within the area outside of the 2010 Growth Ring. " Therefore, the following recommendations of the Planning Commission will remain: 1. Either the number of acres in the project should be increased or the number of dwelling units should be decreased so that the density ratio does not exceed one unit per 20 acres. 2 . The northernmost two lots should be deleted from the plan. Note: The original minutes of the Greeley Planning Commission referred to the "odd sizes" of the northernmost two lots. According to staff members who were present at that meeting, concern also centered around the fact that the two northernmost lots did not appear to be integrated into the overall project. .dial Greg Thompson September 16, 1993 Page Two 3 . The possibility of an agricultural easement affecting all the lots and agricultural parcel should be explored. Note: The agricultural easement concept is intended to give control over the use of the agricultural lot to all property owners of the other lots of the PUD. 4. Fifty feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Weld County Roads 70 and 31 should be dedicated (or reserved) for future arterial roadway use. Note: Although Weld County Road 70 does not appear to warrant the reservation for a proposed arterial, it is the policy of the City's Public Works Department to set aside roads on section lines for potential arterials in the future; therefore, we would still ask that both roads have additional right-of-way dedicated or reserved. We appreciate the opportunity to comment, as always. Please let me know if you have any questions. Very truly yours, Lanell J. Adler Planner II kb cc: Planning Commission 921191 ENT OF 0 X40' ,,..77��„„ �, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY cosy=n.,o„ /4t7.4<<\ / .�� CORPS OF ENGINEERS,OMAHA DISTRICT TRI-LAKES PROJECT OFFICE,9307 STATE HWY 121 4,9 - y QI� iMj LITTLETON,COLORADO 80123-6901 , _ M= REPLYTO September 20, 1993 �`i ATTENTION OF 'a oEM Of ot`E1S Mr. Greg Thompson Weld County Department of Planning Services Weld County Administrative Offices 1400 North 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 Dear Mr. Thompson: This concerns your case number Z-483, Hunters View Estates, located in Section 15, Township 6 North, Range 66 West, Weld County, Colorado. Your project has been reviewed in accordance with Section 404 of the Clean Water Act under which the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers regulates the discharge of dredged and fill material into waters of the United States including wetlands. Reference is made to a September 15, 1993 wetlands determination conducted by Mr. Terry McKee of this office. During Mr. McKee's site visit, it was found that no wetlands exist at this site. This letter is to inform you that the proposed activity, assigned number 199380609, will not require a Department of the Army (DA) Permit. Although a DA Permit will not be required for the project, this does not eliminate the requirement that other applicable federal, state, and local permits be obtained as required. If there are any further questions concerning this matter, please feel free to contact Mr. Terry McKee of this office at 303-979-4120. Sincerely, i Timo y . Car Project ager otC IVE - SEP 2 2 1993 Weld County Pleading 90119.1 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303)353.3845, EXT. 3540 ' WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 1400 N.17TH AVENUE O GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 • COLORADO September 3, 1993 CASE NUMBER: Z-483 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from David and Kayleen Hunt for a Change pf Zone from A (Agricultural) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) . The parcel of land is described as part of the NW4 and part of the SW4 of Section 15, T6N, R66W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is southeast of Weld County Road 7O and Weld County Road 31. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by September 17, 1993 so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Greg Thompson, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following- reasons. 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: 3. We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: a,, 5. X Please refer to the enclosed letter. Signed: J /YV Eaton School District RE-2 - Weld County ,1�uzfav gency: Date: 9/22/93 9u1191 BOARD OF EDUCATION EATON SCHOOL DISTRICT RE-2 ADMINISTRATION WELD COUNTY Mary Lou Carsten, President 36 Cottonwood • P.O. Box 8 • Eaton, Colorado 80615 William E. Powell.Superintendent • (303) 454-3402 Richard Johnson,Asst.to Supt. Keith McIntyre,Vice-President Manuel Jimenez.Princ. H.S. Margaret Schafer.Secretary - Richard Johnson,Asst. Princ.HS. Kenneth Sudduth, Princ. Middle School Russell Meeker,Treasurer Oren Nero.Princ.Eaton Elem. Jan Kreps,Vice-Secretary Walter Jeffers, Princ. Galeton Elem. P D �jp+ Director September 22, 1993il L � SEP 2 4 1993 TO: Weld County Department of Planning Services Weld � • FROM: William E. Powell, Superintendent SUBJECT: Application from David and Kayleen Hunt for a Change of Zone The Eaton RE-2 Board of Education has met with Mr. Hunt on two occasions to talk about the proposed Hunter's View Estates on WCR 31 and WCR 70. The Board has directed the Superintendent to relay to the Department the Board's views regarding this matter. The Eaton RE-2 Board of Education understands that there will be more and more development of housing projects along the Front Range, including Weld County, and including the Eaton RE-2 School District. The school board is concerned that such housing developments will put more and more pressure on available classroom space. The Board is not opposing the development of Mr. Hunt as long as the following items are clearly understood: 1. Lot 9 is shown as a large area that is being farmed and is being irrigated by a large circular watering system. Mr. Hunt told the Board that Lots 1-8 are PUD, and Lot 9 is Aoriculture zoned. Mr. Hunt assures the school board that Lot 9 is not intended now nor is it intended at any time in the future to be developed with houses. The school board does not want lot 9 developed into houses: it wants lot 9 to remain agriculture z 2. The Board is concerned where the main entrance into the housing development is shown on the drawings. It is on a steep slope of a hill which will make it hazardous for school buses loading or unloading children. The Board requested Mr, Hunt to make sure that any entrance/exit to the housing development be designed so th t the m in entr nce is oerneridicular to WCR 31 and not a slanted main entrance way. A school bus can enter and leave a perpendicular entrance way safer than a slanted entrance way. Mr. Hunt assured the Board he would comply with this request and that he would make a large, safe pull off area for a school bus, and that the main entrance will be perpendicular to WCR 31. The Board voted to support the housing development if the above concerns are addressed. If additional information is needed, please feel free to contact this office. ncerely, --111-tvil (7-29/1/Le-)C-- William E. Powell Superintendent cc: Board of Education Mr. David Hunt MEMBER OF NORTH CENTRAL ASSOCIATION SINCE 1914 _ Ju1131 ree. DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES - PHONE(303) 353-3845, EXT. 3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES C 1400 N RAAVENUE GREELEYEY, COLOORADOO 80631631 COLORADO Weld Count/Planing September 3, 1993 CASE NUMBER: Z-483 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from David and Kayleen Hunt for a Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) . The parcel of land is described as part of the NW4 and part of the SW4 of Section 15, T6N, R66W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is southeast of Weld County Road 70 and Weld County Road 31. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by September 17, 1993 so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Greg Thompson, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: 3. & c.)c We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Signed: /W(y eetFU. O«�q� Agency: Como . CDN5 . C6..+m. Date: CEP 7, I 1''3j3 9 :1191 ---\\ • ct DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES ' PHONE (303) 353-3845, EXT. 3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 140C. GREELEY, N. ORAAVENUEO631 COLORADO 80631 COLORADO September 3, 1993 CASE NUMBER: Z-483 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from David and Kayleen Hunt for a Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) . The parcel of land is described as part of the NW4 and part of the SW4 of Section 15, T6N, R66W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is southeast of Weld County Road 7O and Weld County Road 31. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by September 17, 1993 so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Greg Thompson, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: 3.v We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Please refer to the enclosed letter. I • Signed: N �gency: t r,� Prate- ® I / r T Date: 9-79.-47.7/ 13 OCT 0 1 1993 11 Weld County Planning 931191 i IlicIIISIT Department of Planning Services Meld County Administrative Offices 1400 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, Co 80631 October 4 , 1993 Dear Planning Commission Members, I am concerned about a Planned Unit Development being built on Weld County Road 31 . If it is built, it will destroy the wildlife and the natural food chain in this area. The mice won' t be able to eat the corn, or have homes . The foxes won' t have mice to feed on. Hawks won ' t have foxes or mice to feed on. The population of wildlife would decrease . I am also concerned that Neffs Lake will get too polluted. The blue herons that live in Neffs Lake now would die because of the pollution. Also , the noise and disturbances would make it difficult for them to nest and raise young. Even if the sub-division starts out as only eight houses , it will be harmful to the wildlife. If more houses are built, it will push the wildlife out of more and more land. Please help support the wildlife in our area. Don' t let this sub-division be built. Sincerely, Eric Hoff age 10 34251 WCR 31 Greeley, CO 80631 9Z1191 i • EXHIBIT I S CONCERNS REGARDING THE PROPOSED HUNTER'S VIEW PROJ 1. High water table/septic tanks A. Most of the homes adjacent to Road 31 have sump pumps in their basements B. Increased pumping activity parallels the irrigation season C. Septic tanks on or near the water table could potentially result in polluted water entering those basements 2. The artificial creation of waste land areas as a result of installation of pivot sprinklers should not make a property unique. A. This is a dangerous precedent because every farmer in Weld County could create the same circumstances who wish to sell off the corners of their properties. B. The northwest corner of the proposed PUD is serviced by a cement-lined ditch and has been perfectly adequate farm ground in the past. 3 . Access to Road 31 A. According to the map of the proposed accesses to the property, the northwest outlet is proposed to enter Road 31 dangerously close to the intersection of Road 31 and Road 70. B. The southwest outlet is below the crest of a hill to the north which would render it a very dangerous place for a school bus to load and unload children. 4. Additional development of Lot 9 would potentially place an unbearable burden on the roadways and utilities in the area. A. If the PUD is granted, it is our opinion that the agricultural ground set aside in Lot 9 will soon be for one reason or another declared unfit for agriculture and therefore suitable for further development. B. Such development will undoubtedly destroy the quality of living within our neighborhood and thereby lower the property value and potential resale of our homes. C. Development of the proposed project would in the opinion of the present residents destory the uniqueness of the )existing community. Wayne Leusink y Leu nk 33751 Weld County Road 31 33751 Weld County Road 31 Greeley, CO 80631 Greeley, CO 80631 9:1191 i EXHIBIT Petition Objecting to I - , Planned Unit Development A The undersigned residents, living in the vicinity but beyond the designated 500' of the Planned Unit Development proposed by David & Kayleen Hunt, object to the PUD on the basis that it is not consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan and it is not compatible with the surrounding community. Name Address Phone 661/26A44_.- 4—' 76/0-06 6O C.. 7e77 ccievicy2 li,S ;Z)65— f�� f ' /950v /J(/7V Eli A/5<f-4� .i a,, 62e. ,-,z 41502 U1 CA 7y e° n 454/- 22-2_ / Y So a La R 2 y v�et, `f s y 2-ii zz-4 ,ify z/ / 4( -N ' ,) lit "foci / 9C.1191 Petition Objecting to Planned Unit Development The undersigned residents, living in the vicinity but beyond the designated 500' of the Planned Unit Development proposed by David & Kayleen Hunt, object to the PUD on the basis that it is not consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan and it is not compatible with the surrounding community. Name Address Phone c 4 - V-7-7�uU.ee-e- 357.o/ /-)e1C 3 / `z5 -3OS cfc,_ cZct t-F L , I( 3S 9 D / WO 12-3 q. St-1 3 ? 3590/ GO� 3/ �s`f 31>s‘ (Dc 4e-cm 'e R 3/ 51O-Y :2,0 9 ? /2/9�'/ alCil 7;2 316'4 - �o ctt a ig-otcsi 7 (,ar L• I9Y ?/ co 011_ 7a. ifs - 30VC U)2kre I ah_fAx_ h 6t i/`jam I LASut, 3 SSa9 A cS"Cci 3 i q y-2. in 9/efC- 3 / yea`� z y /S y'6 we'p 7S/ 1(5S/-a II-)6 (4.64.4›, j—JAL-e/teAlei-c: /svic<,, Okla c( (74,5--Vaiscic, 90,1191 EXHIBIT I Ar31 Petition Objecting to Planned Unit Development The undersigned residents living within 500 ' of the Planned Unit Development proposed by David & Kayleen Hunt, object to the PUD on the basis that it is not consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan and it is not compatible with the surrounding community. Name Address Phone `/22( 11a � - s�S') 7 ( . dal S5-3 -le Joq 3,6"3 - O y0 9(A1111- I) ��c�u..�.�2� 3575/ `f�l�/� 5/ 35"l�v7�3 ( � 9 l -O 7f3 rite-- 53ouuL� 5, Qp 33835 weK. 3/ 55/ ---II +3 JoficiA c4"wl`/ 3 3 3 5 wee 3 ! 367 -2 / 73 ice---;< e{/} 4 70 Ls / a -969 ifs 50- 41��in /5�'7 /let 7a v / S Y " wc290 /sf- 7 O ,„ 7K72) - g1/45-92-6.5-51/ 91191 Petition Objecting to Planned Unit Development The undersigned residents living within 500 ' of the Planned Unit Development proposed by David & Kayleen Hunt, object to the PUD on the basis that it is not consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan and it is not compatible with the surrounding community. Name Address Phone _s 3YAs1 woe a' 4sY 3713 3 / c 3/ ys y-.37/3 90.1191 FIELD CHECK FILING NUMBER: Z-483 DATE OF INSPECTION: September 10, 1993 APPLICANT'S NAME: David and Kayleen Hunt/Hunter' s View Estates REQUEST: A Change of Zone from A to PUD. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NW4 and Part of the SW4 of Section 15, T6N, R66W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: Southeast of Weld County Road 70 and Weld County Road 31. LAND USE: N Irrigated crops, rural residence E Irrigated crops, rural residences, feedlot S Rural residences, lake, small feedlot, irrigated crops W Irrigated crops, rural residences, pasture ZONING: N A (Agricultural) E A (Agricultural) S A (Agricultural) W A (Agricultural) COMMENTS: Major ditch on the east side of Weld County Road 31, along the site of proposed southern residence portion of the Planned Unit Development. Areas proposed for residences are sprinkler corners. There is one residence currently on the southern residential area, as shown on the plat. The ditch forms the southern boundary of property. Ground slopes from north to south. Greg Thompson Current Planner 921191 LAND-USE APPLICATION SUMMARY SHEET Date: October 5, 1993 CASE NUMBER: Z-483 NAME: David and Kayleen Hunt, c/o Brian Grubb ADDRESS: 1300 30th Street, #E2-32, Boulder, CO 80303 REQUEST: A Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) . LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NW4 and part of the SW4 of Section 15, T6N, R66W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: Southeast of Weld County Road 70 and Weld County Road 31. SIZE OF PARCEL: 93.235 acres, more or less. POSSIBLE ISSUES SUMMARIZED FROM APPLICATION MATERIALS: The criteria for review of this Special Review permit is listed in Section 24.3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. The Department of Planning Services' staff has received responses from the following agencies: 1. Army Corps of Engineers. 2. City of Greeley. 3. Weld County Health Department. 4. Weld County Engineering Department. 5. North Weld County Water District. 6. Town of Eaton. 7. Oil and Gas Conservation Commission. 8. Eaton School District, RE-2. The Department of Planning Services' staff has not received referral responses from: 1. Weld County Sheriff' s Office. 2. Colorado Division of Wildlife. 3. Eaton Fire Protection District. 4. Greeley #2 Canal. 5. Greeley Soil Conservation District. The Department of Planning Services' staff has not received any objections from surrounding property owners. 9:1191 it ic? ‘;, DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES lli PHONE(303)353-3845, EXT. 3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES C. 1400 N. 17TH AVENUE GREELEYEY, COLORADO 80631 COLORADO NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Weld County Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, October 5, 1993, at 9:00 a.m. for the purpose of considering a Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) for the property described below. Approval of the request may create a vested property right pursuant to Colorado Law. APPLICANT: David and Kayleen Hunt LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NW4 and part of the SW4 of Section 15, T6N, R66W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. TYPE AND INTENSITY OF PROPOSED USE: Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) . LOCATION: Southeast of Weld County Road 70 and Weld County Road 31. SIZE: 93.235 acres, more or less The public hearing will be held in the Weld County Commissioners' Hearing Room, First Floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado. Comments or objections related to the above request should be submitted in writing to the Weld County Department of Planning Services, 1400 N. 17th Avenue, Greeley, Colorado 80631, before the above date or presented at the public hearing on October 5, 1993. Copies of the application are available for public inspection in the Department of Planning Services, 1400 N. 17th Avenue, Greeley, Colorado 80631 - Phone - 353-3845, Extension 3540. Judy Yamaguchi, Chairperson Weld County Planning Commission To be published in the Windsor Beacon To be published one (1) time by Septem er 9, 1993 Received by �u}l 1 C Date: 901191 • . �' .I: E2, iio `,,,G, „;,7,, [ i::, c\c,N. !--•,,rt . -; : • reic •° :—. I. •T 7N., „ ' r\'o .. :c ry `• . . ( ' . lo•:: l •. • A =�v & D! . ___ __• 6. --V,ThI.;-.----•-r - — .."- 'fl-1,1-1' " ;'', " 4 •7' it i It i, iiii9 �. •,. xS �(EgJ, 12♦ �9 id 20 • 2t j 1 PacRDrd iion I•a in i i • 1 •. __ _._•I i ..._ .• x..0 • Pss 177, _ _ o L o 78. . . . :,,T±:1_ t E] JO• • T ' JO 76 ��++,,.� '14.• icrt .L. N 3�� ',lb,. i ••e .. � I . i -- l �w � • D GPEP wE0rEPN: i t • I �.g� LRf J3 Prserr I [Sy , t o ��I — ;ego IP .A •I �iJ 1 .•t�• i:i3 ( �I. 41✓7t'' • J� I EATGN t wig , • o`�o a ®. IIx3Willt 4" I • wm%s `/ i i �`�� V o. _ „Jr 0 M . 2 41.• 11 ' 70. .,•30 1 :41 PIM" 1 r IU-- - - -lk&AtratC\ inialinnt3.,,,,,,,b I , , dz. & 1, -if we >a.rresa • . �' ! � � I W '�� P I \i\oproLp.u.c.::: y]F ,��\ ' •l 1 b x x.. 66. . H • !�_ �� t..`�+ ' ,p - �.1 � i.. ,. •..... .=aireg• :..1,4„•i. 3 i Irk NTON t • 1 5.0.1"z-NN t x• 1{1 era C.) IIE - - ..••° i ,iortreivraritywNia gp,tic k -i, ....4,...1.,, Mg 1- IN ' '��5` ® Sal . , =El I Goal r1t. ir �o � Q V vpia : Dl.i- 0. 7 _ „....c,,,,,„„ „.,,, I 58 Z.,tO vet. ,I • . ii •,‘, • •.0 t .G3 a ii 56. . . . T 5 N. - Ic,�... cp ti '... 54. . . t ra Len., . I�r.Z Ate'void . •,�. ! I I algae pI EVAN5',I • 10 :It . c, mpi., , 3Il 1,7 31 - ,74 8.10M OWN r \ First COr r ett i On I� � '- I ©��b/46.5.I r"^4.I•• t� , •` ��' �_ RE �•E fEo N,I'•'r# 0 '1I C K oa.�uii d,< a 11 - � + (�� \�� ' D.. ! UNION SC ' I r•o-zn�,. 'II; ..,- gar :�+a�irily a�lat�tra ��r Cr/•;%• I s - • I •�°' Pv li_•_D`•e-� 11 Pr4ICIP!...cAga_ rd V��rya hinf pop ^ V• _ _O'er ->-_ J• .. •5 intiu. . 1✓®a` l. .p 4! !'m'a � i1, •. 'lie 411) : -- In k NOFITh_lAs0 0,- - - • • ., ..cr .. se.. iarr smatc-if it= �y •• I• •• •itis. _ _ _ _ _ _ I . i ,,,,,,r _„:„.„:.____ _ _ .:. : . • i. .. • te.. •25 i 25 f.<ii/ • .° :ir � a ,t' zS r / - - -al "u:I:1 w i Vf I •'e » ��' zs -t p.GaCFE5i• J -r01 i-� i y it N \H„,;--,./,‘,‘„,„ `- � A / II �/ ��• I N .,�o ce's 3 �,.5•5_�<9,e �� A -,9 4,) I �z— <45gV ___;85-z0,___ 6 0-_a_�---�— 8.0 I�� 10 \� <B)0 �� —<5591 �ic A I <B0<. NJ r II NC:7N 473 l o r e, \ � 820 �' 4B0 � 15 ° 4 14 I. I 1 aso1 » ' .I Neff Lake -a / "O----__------ j -�,/-- i 0 ° ° a IJ• Tom_ �i 4752 I' 4]5]I �� 4 \ Well • 4 4J6,O 52 'e-:r Ho9akt a< 391 `a>5O p° �J Reservoir \ 0REEGEv- w °• i a 21 22 23_ /-\ .i., 47-.,-..:,23) ) Y': / 0 0 �y ,�Y / �_ ^lt a ')m AIL \� 1 . e \ Seeley , �XLa Grange 4-' �;a h'. , School t. i[472/ \ _,\ � �_J i�.; 47251 •a _ •—4720--�� i30 0. ° /_� '•yyy� �'iL ,Op--I�� ` / y � a ice_ / • • s 41.1N1 s rya{.,%.„ e4 ' a i z f4.44: • • 4' : is •44•444 h r :1: : :.p • $ r z '. a ..-l"'I.• a A rn, At r i 4, !! • ; f`F IFT^'y FY` & 7F' .. 4. i• �� ^ „ 'a ,, ,,„,,•;•,:.:,•• ,, r, „ • : ,... : :..,„:• • . ...,•;.: „ , . ••:. }, ,, v9 t ,2 j t• 44 „�,}�' . Il.«, y , x . a x"F�'�. t a . • • • • . •fi x r k Y 2t..�3-.. tlt p e n ty Z: 1tJTI1 A 1 ,.••• • u r t 4 • x':22'n ` • '"; ; ,4;... alt ' ri• k p { •?k , ::•'` .fir,. i'`h7 be Asor __ • i • • • • •,. ••(•1. ..;,it 4.... t. ,• j i ' x y. • Yjt2 . rh. w.w. • I �.1 • ' � 1, A, v I fit° ,�11�. • •VJ•e,l ', P w i CERTIFICATE OF MAILING I hereby certify that I have placed a true and correct copy of the surrounding property owners and owners and lessees of minerals in accordance with the notification requirements of Weld County in Case Number Z-483 for David and Kayleen Hunt in the United States Mail, postage prepaid First Class Mail by letter as addressed on the attached list. this 8 day of September, 1993. ,CMCOA-6--C 9a1191 itot DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES liD PHONE (303)353-3845, EXT. 3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 140C. GREELEY, N. ORAAVENUEO631 COLORADO 80631 COLORADO DATE: September 3, 1993 TO: SURROUNDING PROPERTY/MINERAL OWNERS CASE NUMBER: Z-483 There will be a Public Hearing before the Weld County Planning Commission on Tuesday, October 5, 1993, at 9:00 a.m. , in the County Commissioners' Hearing Room, First Floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado concerning the request of: NAME: David and Kayleen Hunt FOR: A Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) . LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NW4 and part of the SW4 of Section 15, T6N, R66W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: Southeast of Weld County Road 70 and Weld County Road 31. Your property is within five-hundred (500) feet of the property on which this request has been made or you may have an interest in the minerals located under the property under consideration. For additional information write or telephone Greg Thompson, Current Planner. Comments or objections related to the above request should be submitted in writing to the Weld County Department of Planning Services, 1400 N. 17th Avenue, Greeley, Colorado 80631, on or before the date of public hearing. 3a191 SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS AND/OR SUBSURFACE ESTATE MINERAL OWNERS David and Kayleen Hunt Z-483 Franklin R. Johnson Jr. 15470 Weld County Road 70 Greeley, CO 80631 Natalie Sena c/o Johnson Sena Farm 15470 Weld County Road 70 Greeley, CO 80631 Douglas and Sonia Burron 15374 Weld County Road 70 Greeley, CO 80631 Burman Chevrolet Company 15741 Highway 392 Greeley, CO 80631 James and Lucille Stockover 39 Ward Drive #201 Greeley, CO 80634 Dwaine and Nancy Kurtz 33693 Weld County Road 31 Greeley, CO 80631 Wayn and Judith Leusink 33751 Weld County Road 31 Greeley, CO 80631 Scott and Janice Rapp 33838 Weld County Road 31 Greeley, CO 80631 William and Rosella Monson 33877 Weld County Road 31 Greeley, CO 80631 R.H. Farms Incorporated 12315 Weld County Road 72 Eaton, CO 80615 Harold and Joyce Anderson/Ernest Nelson 15295 Weld County Road 70 Greeley, CO 80631 9 .1191 SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS AND/OR SUBSURFACE ESTATE MINERAL OWNERS David and Kayleen Hunt Z-483 Page 2 Donald Carpenter 14953 Weld County Road 70 Greeley, CO 80631 Carpenter Enterprise 14953 Weld County Road 70 Greeley, CO 80631 Joseph and Elain Hoff 34251 Weld County Road 31 Greeley, CO 80631 91.191 DATE: October 5, 1993 CASE NUMBER: Z-483 APPLICANT: David and Kayleen Hunt, c/o Brian Grubb ADDRESS: 1300 30th Street #E2-32, Boulder, CO 80303 REQUEST: A Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) . LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NW4 and part of the SW4 of Section 15, T6N, R66W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: Southeast of Weld County Road 70 and Weld County Road 31. THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES' STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THIS REQUEST BE APPROVED FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: 1. The submitted materials are in compliance with the application requirements of Section 28.5 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 2. It is the opinion of the Department of Planning Services' staff that the applicant has shown compliance with Section 28.8 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: The proposal is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. The proposed PUD District is located within the urban growth boundary areas of the Town of Eaton and the City of Greeley. The Town of Eaton reviewed this request and found it did not conflict with its interests. A City of Greeley representative reviewed the Greeley Planning Commission comments from April, 1993 concerning the Sketch Plan for this proposal, and reiterated comments which addressed the Sketch Plan. The uses permitted by the PUD District will be compatible with the future development as projected by the surrounding zone district. The PUD District and conditions of approval insure compatibility with existing uses on adjacent properties and within the PUD. The uses allowed in the proposed PUD District will conform with the performance standards contained in Section 35.3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. North Weld County Water District will provide domestic water service to the PUD District. Individual sewer disposal systems will be used to serve the residential lots of the PUD District. Weld County Road 31 will provide access to the PUD District. Portions of the Planning Unit Development district site are located in the A-P Airport Overlay District Area. Structures located in the Overlay District shall conform to the regulations of this district. No other overlay districts, special soil conditions, or commercial mineral deposits are known to be located on the subject site. (� 9 1191 RECOMMENDATION, Z-483 David and Kayleen Hunt, c/o Brian Grubb Page 2 This recommendation is based, in part, upon a review of the application materials submitted by the applicant, other relevant information regarding the request, and responses from referral entities. The Department of Planning Services' staff recommendation for approval is conditional upon the following notes being placed on the amended P.U.D. District plat prior to recording. 1. Uses allowed in the PUD District are identified by Lot and shall comply with uses allowed in the Weld County Zoning Ordinance for Estate and Agricultural zone districts, unless otherwise stated on the PUD District plat or PUD Final Plan plat. 2. All streets within the PUD District are private and shall be built to County standards. The private road system proposed as part of a PUD plan is subject to review by the Engineering and Planning Departments and approval by the Board of County Commissioners. All streets within the PUD District shall be maintained by the homeowners association, lot owners, or developer. 3. North Weld County Water District shall provide the domestic water supply to the residential uses. 4. Individual sewer disposal systems shall provide adequate sewer to the residential uses. 5. Animal bulk requirements for various species of livestock and domestic animal requirements shall be established as part of the PUD Final plan submittal. 6. Installation of utilities shall comply with Section 12 of the Weld County Subdivision Regulations. 7. There shall be no outside storage of equipment, boats, recreational vehicles or automobiles. 8. The two areas of open space shall be maintained by the homeowners association or the developer. 9. Each lot shall be permitted to have no more than 1 accessory structure, which does not exceed 1200 square feet. 10. Before obtaining a building permit, the Architectural Review Committee shall offer their approval of the proposed structure. 11. A qualified soils and foundation engineer shall both design and supervise the construction of all building foundations. The engineers report shall be submitted with any building permit applications. 9 ,1191 RECOMMENDATION, Z-483 David and Kayleen Hunt, c/o Brian Grubb Page 3 12. All PUD plans shall comply with the requirements of the Eaton Fire Protection District, Eaton School District (RE-2) , Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, and Sheriff' s Department. 13. Prior to recording the plat, the plat shall be amended to include the recommendations made by the Utility Board in their meeting of September 23, 1993. 14. Fifty feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Weld County Roads 70 and 31 shall be reserved for future arterial roadway use. 15. The plat shall be submitted within 15 days of approval. 9-J1191 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS David and Kayleen Hunt Z-483 The Greeley Planning Commission had concerns about: 1. The two northern-most residential lots, and requested they be removed from the project. 2. The areas in the project should be increased or dwelling units decreased so that the density ratio is not over one unit per acre. :1191 • ct DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES 1 PHONE (303)353-3845, EXT. 3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 140C. GREELEY, N. ORAO AVENUE COLORADO 80631 COLORADO September 3, 1993 David and Kayleen Hunt c/o Brian Grubb 1300 30th Street Boulder, CO 80303 Subject: Z-483 - Request for approval of a Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) on a parcel of land described as part of the NW4 and part of the SW4 of Section 15, T6N, R66W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. Dear Mr. Grubb: Your application and related materials for the request described above are complete and in order at the present time. I have scheduled a meeting with the Weld County Planning Commission for Tuesday, October 5, 1993, at 9:00 a.m. This meeting will take place in the Weld County Centennial Center, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado. It is the policy of Weld County to refer an application of this nature to any town or municipality lying within three miles of the property in question or if the property under consideration is located within the comprehensive planning area of a town or municipality. Therefore, our office has forwarded a copy of the submitted materials to the Eaton and Greeley Planning Commissions for their review and comments. Please call Gary Carsten (Eaton) , at 454-3338 and Hank Epstein (Greeley) , at 350-9783 for information regarding the dates, times and places of these meetings and the review processes. It is recommended that you and/or a representative be in attendance at each of the meetings described above in order to answer any questions that might arise with respect to your application. It is the responsibility of an applicant to see that a sign is posted on the property under consideration at least 10 days preceding the hearing date. Sometime prior to September 20, 1993, 1993, you or a representative should call me to obtain a sign to be posted on the site no later than September 25, 1993. The sign shall be posted adjacent to and visible from a publicly maintained road right-of-way. In the event the property under consideration is not adjacent to a publicly maintained road right-of-way, the applicant shall post one sign in the most prominent place on the 9 ,1191 Brian Grubb Z-483 Page 2 property and post a second sign at the point at which the driveway (access drive) intersects a publicly maintained road right-of-way. Your sign posting certificate must be returned to the Department of Planning Services' office on or before the date of the hearing. The Department of Planning Services' staff will make a recommendation concerning this application to the Weld County Planning Commission. It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact the Department of Planning Services office a few days before the date of the hearing to obtain that recommendation. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to call me. Sincerely - ij fir• Greg ompson Current Planner 9a1191 REFERRAL LIST NAME: David and Kayleen Hunt CASE NUMBER: Z-483 REFERRALS SENT: September 3, 1993 REFERRALS TO BE RECEIVED BY: September 17, 1993 COUNTY TOWNS and CITIES Attorney _Ault V X Health Department _Brighton _Extension Service _Broomfield Emergency Management Office Dacono X Sheriff's Office U/—.1--Eaton X Engineering _Erie _Housing Authority _Evans _Airport Authority _Firestone _Building Inspection _Fort Lupton _Frederick STATE _Garden City _Division of Water Resources Gilcrest Geological Survey `X Greeley Department of Health _Grover _Department of Transportation _Hudson _Historical Society _Johnstown Water Conservation Board _Keenesburg Oil and Gas Conservation Commission Kersey X Division of Wildlife _La Salle FIRE DISTRICTS Lochbuie _Ault F-1 _Longmont Berthoud F-2 _Mead Briggsdale F-24 _Milliken Brighton F-3 New Raymer X Eaton F-4 _Northglenn _Fort Lupton F-5 Nunn Galeton F-6 _Pierce _Hudson F-7 _Platteville _Johnstown F-8 Severance La Salle F-9 _Thornton Mountain View F-10 _Windsor Milliken F-11 _Nunn F-12 COUNTIES _Pawnee F-22 _Adams _Platteville F-13 _Boulder _Platte Valley F-14 Larimer _Poudre Valley F-15 _Raymer F-2 FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES _Southeast Weld F-16 V' X US Army Corps of Engineers _Windsor/Severance F-17 _USDA-APHIS Veterinary Service _Wiggins F-18 Federal Aviation Administration Western Hills F-20 _Federal Communication Commission OTHER SOIL CONSERVATION DISTRICTS _Central Colo. Water Conservancy Dist. _Brighton _Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. Fort Collins _Tri-Area Planning Commission X Greeley V X North Weld Water District _Longmont X RE-2 Eaton School District _ West Adams X Greeley #2 Canal P.O. Box 104 COMMISSION/BOARD MEMBER Lucerne, CO 80646 X Ron Sommer 921191 Hunter's View Estates application for a Change of Zone 9:1191 Hunter's View Estates Change of Zone and Final Plat neighborhood and insure the long term value of the lots. It is not our desire to create a development that will be in conflict with the agricultural nature of the area. The architectural style of the homes will be such that they will be sensitive to the landscape,the neighborhood and the view of people traveling on highway 392. No reflective materials will be allowed on any structure although any structure consistent with the vernacular will be considered by the architectural review committee. The use of colors will not be limited except that no high-intensity colors will be permitted. Fencing will be limited to the use of solid woods including cedar, redwood and pressure treated lumber as well as finish masonry materials. Each lot will be allowed to have animals on the property in a manner consistent with the requirements of the Estate Zone District,or 1 animal unit per acre as long as the owner maintains one acre of irrigated pasture for each animal unit and has the appropriate screened corrals approved by the architectural review committee and constructed.Shelter for animals will be reviewed by the architectural control committee. Each lot may have one accessory structure strictly for sheltering animals and for livestock related equipment. not to exceed 1200 square feet. This is much more restrictive than the requirements of the Estate Zone District which allows up to 3,000 square feet of accessory structure, The idea is that accessory structures should not be allowed to equal or dominate the single family dwellings within the subdivision. There will be no outside storage of equipment,boats, recreational vehicles or automobiles. Each dwelling will be required to have a minimum 20'x20' garage. All garages will be attached to the main dwelling by at least one common wall. If the owner has a recreational vehicle then he will be required to construct an attached R.V. garage. The uses allowed on Lot 9 will be the same as those allowed in the Estate Zone District except that the number of animal units allowed will be 4 per acre. Other uses allowed on agriculture zoned property by the Weld County Zoning Ordinance will be allowed on Lot 9 only after a Special Review Permit is approved by the Board of County Commissioners. In other words,the uses allowed on Lot 9 shall be the same as those in the Estate District. Any uses not allowed in the Estate Zone District but are allowed in the Agricultural Zone District may be allowed only as a use by special review. All construction must be approved by the Architectural Review Committee. There will be two areas of open space totaling approximately 2.8 acres. These areas are either wetlands or have the potential to be wetlands. No wetlands will be disturbed because of the development. This open space will only be used as a visual amenity for the residents of Hunter's View Estates and the responsibility of maintaining that open space in accordance with all County,State and Federal regulations will be that of the Homeowner's association. Based on a conversation with Terry McKee of the Army Corps of Engineers,we believe that no wetlands permits will be required. 7/5/95 924 AM parrz szl "''i Hunter's View Estates Change of Zone and Final Plat Corrals will be limited to 10,000 square feet and duet shall be controlled by providing a sprinkling system. All areas not covered by a structure or a corral shall be seeded with adaptive grasses. The parcels need not be irrigated unless there is livestock on site. Pasture shall not be overgrazed to the point that grasses become less than 2"tall or less than 60% coverage. The site slopes gently so that soil erosion from water should be minimal. It is the opinion of the applicant that this proposal is consistent with the Urban Growth area goals and policies of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. The subject parcel is within the Urban Growth Boundary of the City of Greeley. The City of Greeley Planning Commission has indicated that the sketch plan submitted was not in conflict with their comprehensive plan. The other technical issues raised by the planning commission will be addressed in the section of this application that responds to all of the referral responses to the sketch plan. The source of water will be a 2 inch line and a 3 inch line from North Weld County Water District. We have been in contact with the water district and they have indicated that a tap will be available for each lot as long as the districts conditions are met. There should be no problem meeting their requirements. The soil types are Wiley-Colby-Weld, Kim loam 1-3 percent slopes,and Kim loam,3-5 percent slopes. The potential for urban development in these soil types is listed as fair to good. More detailed information is attached. There are no oil or gas production facilities on the property. Oil and gas production will be allowed on Lot 9. Each lot will be served by an individual septic system. The Hunt residence already has a tap for natural gas. During conversations with Greeley Gas and Public Service, we have found that the ebsting tap may be adequate to serve the rest of the development. Access to natural gas is an unusual amenity for rural subdivisions and we intend to pursue aquiring hook-ups for each lot. All interior roads will be gravel roads, with a width of 20'plus 3' of shoulder on each side,plus borrow pits with a 60'total right-of-way. The size and type of fill and aggregate will be determined by county standards. All streets will be maintained by the homeowners association as will be outlined in the covenants. Cul-de-sac construction will be consistent with county standards with a minimum 65'radius right-of-way and 55' radius to the edge of the graveled surface. The lots range in size from 1.4 to 3.4 acres with lot 9 being 66 acres more or less. No more than 10% of any lot will be covered with impermeable surfaces. Therefore the lots should be more than capable of handling the runoff that is created on site. The 40'setback requirement for dwellings along the no. 2 canal will insure that there is adequate distance between the dwellings and the canal to absorb any runoff created. 715195 924 Aid page3 9:1131 Hunter's View Estates Change of Zone and Final Plat No overlay districts affect the site. The property is not in a geologic hazard zone.a flood hazard zone or located on a commercial mineral deposit. The surrounding land uses within 1/2 mile are as follows: o a small dairy approximately 1/4 mile to the south 0 four single family residences to the west 0 two single family residences the the northeast o irrigated cropland and a small lake to the east 0 Greeley#2 Canal and Neff lake to the south The Construction schedule will be determined by the approval date. If this application is approved some time in July or August,then the improvements will be made within 6 months. If the project receives final approval in September or thereafter,then the improvements will be constructed by August of 1994. The improvements included are: 1. construction of two access roads 2. burying the utilities such as water, gas,electric, and phone 3. constructing the entrance signage and 4. planting the entrance landscaping The estimated cost for all of the improvements is $30,000. The improvements will be paid for by the property owner. Homes will be constructed on an individual basis as the lots are sold. Response to Sketch Plan, Referrals letter dated May 11, 1993 from Planning Staff The Weld County Engineering Department commented that the entrance,internal road and cul-de-sac's need to be designed to county standards. All of those items have been engineered and are shown on the final plat and other supporting drawings. The internal roads will be decicated to the public but will be maintained by the Homeowner's Association as prescribed in the attached covenants. North Weld County Water District said in their letter (written by Thomas Ullman of TEC) that the existing 2"line in Weld County Road 31 and the existing 3"line in Weld County Road 70 will be adequate to serve the proposed development unless fire flows are required. I have spoken with Don Cadwallader,fire chief of the Eaton Fire Protection District and he indicated that a fire hydrant for fighting fires directly is not required. However,a hydrant for filling up the pumper truck and the tanker truck is desired. North Weld County Water District routinely installs this type of hydrant at the end of a line. There will be a hydrant on the north end of the property as well as the south end for the purpose of filling trucks. The Oil and Gas Conservation Commission had concerns that there may be an existing lease on the property. There is no oil or gas lease currently on the property. The applicant desires to allow drilling only on lot 9 (70 acres ±). In reality this does not restrict potential drilling operations any more than the setback requirments for oil & gas drilling. There is virtually no place on the smaller lots where drilling could take place without being too dose to a dwelling. 715193 924 AM py4 92,1191 Hunter's View Estates Chance of Zone and Final Plat The Army Corp of Engineers merely stated that there is any dredging or filling of wetlands then a permit will be required. As has been stated in previously,there will be no dredging or filling of any wetlands. Those areas are being set aside as open space that will be maintained by the Homeowner's Association in accordance with all applicable County. State and Federal regulations. The City of Greeley has indicated that 50' of right-of-way from the center line of Weld County Roads 70 and 31 should be reserved. Reserving 50'from the center line of Weld County Road 31 is acceptible. However,WCR 70 is a gravel road designated as a County local (60'total r.o.w.) which will only be used by the farming operation. Therefore,the applicant feels that the requirements of the County are adequate and that 30'from the center line is adequate. Regardless,the applicant is willing to comply with the recommendation of the City of Greeley. The City of Greeley also had concerns about the average density exceeding one unit per 20 acres. This is in reference to Resolution 7, 1985 which was drafted and adopted in response to the number of recorded exemption appfcations that were being reviewed by the city. The Greeley Planning Commission did not want to review every recorded exemption application sent to them so they adopted Resolution 7 so that the planning staff would have the authority to make a recommendation. It is the opinion of the applicant that the resolution does not, nor was it intended to apply to Planned Unit Developments or Subdivisions. Finally,the City of Greeley recommended that the two northern lots should be deleted because of their "odd size". We think that the planning commission was referring to the shape of the lots because the size is consistent with the size of the southern lots. The shape of all of the lots is in conformance with the subdivision regulations of Weld County. We would be happy to respond to the concerns of the City of Greeley upon further clarification. If further information is required. please call the numbers listed on the application form. We would prefer that you call Brian Grubb first at 786-1661 since the property owner is in the middle of the busy season. 715/93 924 AM pags5 921191 Hunter's View Estates Change of Zone and Final Plat Surrounding Property Owners within 500' Name and Address Parcel ID # Franklin R.Johnson Jr. 080515000035 15470 Weld County Road 70 Greeley, Colorado 80631 Natalie Sena do Johnson Sena Farm 080515000036 15470 Weld County Road 70 Greeley, Colorado 80631 Douglas and Sonia Burron 080515000037 15374 Weld County Road 70 Greeley, Colorado 80631 Burman Chevrolet Company 080515000024 15741 Highway 392 Greeley, Colorado 80631 James and Lucille Stockover 080515000021 39 Ward Drive #201 080516000053 Greeley, Colorado 80634 Dwaine and Nancy Kurtz 080516000028 33693 Weld County Road 31 080516000032 Greeley, Colorado 80631 Wayn and Judith Leusink 080516000039 33751 Weld County Road 31 Greeley, Colorado 80631 Scott and Janice Rapp 080516000038 33835 Weld County Road 31 Greeley, Colorado 80634 William and Roselle Monson 080516000040 33877 Weld County Road 31 080516000041 Greeley, Colorado 80631 R.H. Farms Incorporated 080516000048 12315 Weld County Road 72 Eaton,Colorado 80615 Harold and Joyce Anderson/Ernest Nelson 080510000006 15295 Weld County Road 70 Greeley, Colorado 80631 715195 924 AM paip6 9:1191 Hunter's View Estates Chance of Zone and Final Plat Donald Carpenter 080509000005 14953 Weld County Road 70 Greeley, Colorado 80631 Carpenter Enterprises 080509000046 14953 Weld County Road 70 Greeley, Colorado 80631 Joseph and Elain Hoff 080509000045 34251 Weld County Road 31 Greeley, Colorado 80631 715/95 924 AM pais7 9 .1191 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CHANGE OF ZONE AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS SURFACE ESTATE Legal Description: lbe w2 NW4 and that part of the 02 SW4 lvirw north of the m. 2 canal of the New Cadre La Pandit irrigation company, all in Section 15, T6N, R66W of the 6th P.M. Weld Cbmty Colorado STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS COUNTY OF WELD ) THE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn, states that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names, addresses , and the corresponding Parcel Identification Number assigned by the Weld County Assessor of the owners' of property (the surface estate) within five hundred feet of the property under consideration This list was compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor, or an ownership update from a title or abstract company or attorney, derived from such records, or from the records of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. The list compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor shall have been assembled within thirty days of the application' s submission date. 1>d The f regoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me this 3____ 41;;,;°. , 1991. WITNESS my hand fficial seal. : . , a w;..P (/ g L‘ G; t, Notary Public My Colette pi0°Expires: QAJt% S,L- 'II net ''' 9a 1191 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CHANGE OF ZONE AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS MINERALS AND/OR SUBSURFACE ESTATE Legal Description: The W2 NW4 and that part of the W2 SW4 lying north of the no.2 canal of the New Cache La Poudre Irrigation many, all in Section 15, T6N, R66W of the 6th P.M. Weld County Colorado STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS COUNTY OF WELD THE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn, states that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names and addresses of all mineral owners and lessees of mineral owners on or under the parcel of land under as their names appear upon the records in the Weld County Clerk and Recorder' s Office or from an ownership update from a title or abstract company or an attorney. The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me this �i�day of Ci , 1 • WITNESS my hand and official ,.'°z.gealf, 4 a .• •._ Cam. j ‘PA .o. UnLICIt TRW ~�A'•......••' Notary ublic M _ (qq5. My Commission Expires:N -��yl`{L7�') i 9:11,31 1,31 O m 0 v y It m .._ `:Ts�:k'._ ED— '. QI CL. TAB �L .W ]Fa`. tIS. Z WA �44,rF r 1 5 .. _4, 'Eu v f - - {N-{ , _ e K O q Q x g r t j E" Qi A e. f v is Y lu# a.! Y c -: }1O .x i` WQr r'�, �ifA�J(.'a? ; .. ,�'{��X } 4 �,r�y. a a �'• O ] eFa ' dv p 'a 3 r Ew Sr t�l� r< • '� co ' Y-: F ''a v 1..;::,4A W s i • ��a; _--I''� #Y p " ,0,..... ,..-.2„.. ivS/t.Ax jfY "dT 1 -.''?- 1 a -rf's°� +...:.._.'°t s 't'` "fin' y"* v,,z,... �E Ny �s�y'�.1v' -,',,,m t ✓r - Gx F ' ti ,P ^�a M r ' smT*F IC 4.'r•A L,.. , � � n Z�, x. ai..--,•,..„.‘,.1:- — r vi #g 'r t w wir f .r- .m v .G n 3 Ak %,.. � ri4 i• .ti �,5, � � r r 49 r. + :yf • twlR'Fr a 7: 7 :4:.-t1:,..„3,.....„arm .. r i t m a' s 'Ir. : '� ? .. r 4,. „, >r'•`—" .e' 'F^, , i�*. 1 '' '' r...74-,,,,,A... .:.",t21f;r �'w7 '� �W`� 'z "� ♦'"` $''d'yf ' ®"!4 �R: �k 7 c5'al 5. 4 ' }] yytb f WLi "p"® H ,y�, N t A:. .' ` .IW`, - i 6 " ,*:.,,,k "fk` . _ . r gip,,. , SOIL SURVEY 4 tial for urban development is only fair to poor. The main This nearly level to moderately sloping map unit is on limitations are moderate to high shrink swell, low plains and alluvial fans throughout the survey area. It strength, and slow permeability. The potential is fair for makes up about 23.5 percent of the total acreage. About development of openland wildlife habitat. 35 per- cent iscOtero s Olney oils, and 30 pe rent is soilsof minor extent. 3. Weld-Colby The soils in this map unit occupy the same relative Deep, nearly level to moderately sloping, well drained positions on the landscape (fig. 2). Olney soils have a loants formed in calcareous eolian deposits loamy sand or sandy loam surface layer and a sandy clay loam subsoil. Kim soils have a loam surface layer and This nearly level to moderately sloping map unit is on loam and fine sandy loam underlying material. Otero soils plains mainly in the southeastern part of the survey area. have a sandy loam surface layer and fine sandy loam un- One small area is in the west-central part. The unit makes denying material. up about 10 percent of the total acreage. About 50 per- Minor in this unit are the well drained Ascalon, Nelson, cent is Weld soils, 35 percent is Colby soils, and 15 per- Thedalund, and Vona soils. cent is soils of minor extent. This map unit is used for irrigated and nonirrigated Weld soils occupy the broad nearly level areas. Colby cropland and for rangeland. The potential is good for s loam ols occupy the steeper clay yeand la Weld soils have a urban development and fair for wildlife habitat. surface layer and a clay loam subsoil. Colby soils have a loam surface layer and silt loam underlying 6. Otero-Thedalund-Nelson material. Minor in this unit are the well drained Adena and Kim Deep and moderately deep, nearly level to moderately soils. sloping, well drained sandy loams and clay foams This map unit is used mainly for cropland. About 65 formed in alluvium and eolian deposits and in residuum percent is nonirrigated. Winter wheat is the principal from shale and sandstone crop. If irrigated, the soils are well suited to all commonly This nearly level to moderately sloping map unit is on grown crops. The potential is fair for development of plains in the north-central part of the survey area. It openland wildlife habitat. makes up about 3 percent of the total acreage. About 35 CI Wiley-Colby-Weld percent is Otero soils, 25 percent is Thedalund soils, 25 percent is Nelson soils, and 15 percent is soils of minor Deep, nearly level to moderately sloping, well drained silt extent. Warns and loans formed in calcareous eolian deposits Otero soils are on the nearly level or smoother side This nearly level to moderately sloping map unit is on slopes. Thedalund and Nelson soils are intermingled and plains in the west-central and southwestern parts of the are on the steeper side slopes. Otero soils have a sandy survey area. It makes up about 5.5 percent of the total loam surface layer and fine sandy loam underlying acreage. About 30 percent is Wiley soils, 30 percent is material. Thedalund soils have a loam surface layer and Colby soils, 15 percent is Weld soils, and 25 percent is underlying material. Shale is between depths of 20 and 40 soils of minor extent. inches. Nelson soils have a fine sandy loam surface layer Wiley and Colby soils form an intermingled complex and underlying material. Sandstone is between 20 and 40 pattern on the steeper side slopes. Weld soils are along inches. the narrow ridgetops and on the nearly level side slopes. Minor in this unit are the well drained Kim, Renohill, Wiley soils have a silt loam surface layer and a silty clay Terry, and Vona soils. loam subsoil. Colby soils have a loam surface layer and This map unit is used mainly for irrigated cropland. Soil silt loam underlying material. Weld soils have a loam sur- depth is the main limitation in farming and urban face layer and a clay loam subsoil. development. The potential is fair for development of Minor in this unit are the moderately well drained openland wildlife habitat. Heidi soils and the well drained Nunn and Ulm soils. This map unit is used mainly for cropland. About 70 7. Tassel-Thedalund-Terry percent is irrigated and is well suited to all commonly Shallow to moderately deep, gently sloping to strongly grown crops. In ted areas, winter wheat is the sloping, well drained sandy foams to clay foams formed principal crop. The potential is fair for urban develop- in residuum from sandstone and shale ment. Moderately slow permeability is the main limita- tion. The potential is also fair for development of open- This gently sloping to strongly sloping map unit is in land wildlife. the western part of the survey area, adjacent to and in- cluding the sandstone breaks along some of the major 5. Olney-Kim-Otero streams. It makes up about 1 percent of the total acreage. Deep, nearly level to moderately sloping, well drained About 50 percent is Tassel soils, 20 percent is Thedalund sandy foams and loans formed in mixed alluvium and soils, 2O percent is Terry soils, and 10 percent is soils of eolian deposits minor &L,1131 HINSIINIMMOIls ..- WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, SOUTHERN PART 23 Windbreaks and environmental plantings of trees and The potential native vegetation is dominated by blue shrubs commonly grown in the area are generally well grama. Several mid grasses, such as western wheatgrass suited to this soil. Cultivation to control competing and needleandthread, are also present. Potential produc- vegetation should be continued for as many years as tion ranges from 1,600 pounds per acre in favorable years possible following planting. Trees that are best suited and to 1,000 pounds in unfavorable years. As range condition have good survival are Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern deteriorates, the mid grasses decrease; blue grama, buf- redcedar, ponderosa pine, Siberian elm, Russian-olive, and falograss, snakeweed, yucca, and fringed sage increase; hackberry. The shrubs best suited are skunkbush sumac, and forage production drops. Undesirable weeds and an- Siberian peashrub, lilac, and American plum. nuals invade the site as range condition becomes poorer. Wildlife is an important secondary use of this soil. The Management of vegetation on this soil should be based cropland areas provide favorable habitat for ring-necked on taking half and leaving half of the total annual produc- pheasant and mourning dove. Many nongame species can tion. Seeding is desirable if the range is in poor condition. be attracted by establishing areas for nesting and escape Sideoats grama, little bluestem, western wheatgrass, blue cover. For pheasants, undisturbed nesting cover is essen- grama, pubescent wheatgrass, and crested wheatgrass are tial and should be included in plans for habitat develop- suitable for seeding. The grass selected should meet the ment, especially in areas of intensive agriculture. seasonal requirements of livestock. It can be seeded into This soil has good potential for urban and recreational a clean, firm sorghum stubble, or it can be drilled into a development. Increased population growth in the survey firm prepared seedbed. Seeding early in spring has area has resulted in increased homesite construction. The proven most successful. Windbreaks and environmental plantings of trees and chief limiting feature for urban development and road construction is the limited capacity of the soil to support shrubs commonly grown in the area are generally well suited to this soil. Cultivation to control competing a load. Septic tank absorption fields function properly, but community sewage systems should be provided if the vegetation should be continued for as many years as possible following planting. Trees that are best suited and population density increases. Because of the permeability have good survival are Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern of the substratum, sewage lagoons must be sealed. redcedar, ponderosa pine, Siberian elm, Russian olive, and Lawns, shrubs, and trees grow well. Capability class I ir- n ted. hackber y. The shrubs best suited are skunkbush sumac, lilac, Siberian peashrub, and American plum. Kim loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes. This is a deep, Wildlife is an important secondary use of this soil. The well drained soil on smooth plains and alluvial fans at elevations of 4,900 to 5,250 feet. It formed in mixed eolian cropland areas provide favorable habitat for ring-necked pheasant and mourning deposit and parent sediment from a wide variety of dove. Many nongame species can bedrock. Included in mapping are small areas of soils that be attracted by establishing areas for nesting and escape loa n sude in material.s cover. For pheasants, undisturbed nesting cover is essen- haveTypically the surface layer is brown and pale brown tial and should be included in plans for habitat . Rangp- ment, especially in areas of intensive agriculture. Range- loam about 12 inches thick. The upper 28 inches of the un- land wildlife, for example, the pronghorn antelope, can be derlying material is pale brown loam. The lower part to a attracted by developing livestock watering facilities, depth of 60 inches is pale brown fine sandy loam. managing livestock grazing, and reseeding where needed. Permeability is moderate. Available water capacity is This soil has good potential for urban and recreational high. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. development. Increased population growth in the survey Surface runoff is medium, and the erosion hazard is low. area has resulted in increased homesite construction. The In irrigated areas this soil is suited to all crops corn- chief limiting soil feature for urban development and road monly grown in the area, including corn, sugar beets, construction is the limited capacity of this soil to support beans, alfalfa, small grain, potatoes, and onions. An exam- a load. Septic tank absorption fields function properly, but ple of a suitable cropping system is 3 to 4 years of alfalfa community sewage systems should be provided if the followed by corn, corn for silage, sugar beets, small grain, population density increases. Because of the permeability or beans. Land leveling, ditch lining (fig. 6), and installing of the substratum, sewage lagoons must be sealed. pipelines may be needed for proper water applications. Lawns, shrubs, and trees grow well. Capability subclass All methods of irrigation are suitable, but furrow ir- IIe irrigated, IVe nonirrigated; Loamy Plains range site. rigation is the most common. Barnyard manure and com- Kim loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes. This is a deep, mercial fertilizer are needed for top yields. we drained soil on plains and alluvial fans at elevations In nonirrigated areas this soil is suited to winter wheat, of 4,900 to 5,250 feet. It formed in mixed eolian deposits barley, and sorghum. Most of the acreage is planted to and parent sediment from a wide variety of bedrock. In- winter wheat and is summer fallowed in alternate years eluded in mapping are small areas of soils that have to allow moisture accumulation. Generally precipitation is loamy sand underlying material. too low for beneficial use of fertilizer. Typically the surface layer is brown and pale brown Stubble mulch farming, striperopping, and minimum til- loam about 10 inches thick. The upper 28 inches of the un- lage are needed to control soil blowing and water erosion. derlying material is pale brown loam. The lower part to a Terracing also may be needed to control water erosion. depth of 60 inches is pale brown fine sandy loam. 921191 24 SOIL SURVEY Permeability is moderate. Available water capacity is land wildlife, for example, the pronghorn antelope, can bE high. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. attracted by developing livestock watering facilities Surface runoff is medium, and the erosion hazard is managing livestock grazing, and reseeding where needed. moderate. This soil has good potential for urban and recreational In irrigated areas this soil is suited to crops commonly development. Increased population growth in the surve: grown in the area. Perennial grasses and alfalfa or close area has resulted in increased homesite construction. Th grown crops should be grown at least 50 percent of the chief limiting soil feature for urban development and roar time. Contour ditches and corrugations can be used in ir- construction is the limited capacity of this soil to suppor rigating close grown crops and pasture. Furrows, contour a load. Septic tank absorption fields function properly, bu furrows, and cross slope furrows are suitable for row community sewage systems should be provided if th crops. Sprinkler irrigation is also suggested. Keeping til- population density increases. Because of the perm eabilit; lage to a minimum and utilizing crop residue help to con- of the substratum, sewage lagoons must be scale(' trol erosion. Maintaining fertility is important. Crops Lawns, shrubs, and trees grow well. Capability subclas respond to applications of phosphorus and nitrogen. IIIe irrigated, IVe nonirrigated; Loamy Plains range site In nonirrigated areas this soil is suited to winter wheat, barley, and sorghum. Most of the acreage is planted to Kim loam, 5 to 9 percent slopes. This is a deel winter wheat. The predicted average yield is 28 bushels we drained soil on plains and alluvial fans at elevation per acre. The soil is summer fallowed in alternate years of 4,900 to 5,250 feet. It formed in mixed eolian deposit to allow moisture accumulation. Generally precipitation is and parent sediment from a wide variety of bedrock. Ir too low for beneficial use of fertilizer. eluded in mapping are small areas of soils that hay Stubble mulch farming, striperopping, and minimum til- loamy sand underlying material. lage are needed to control soil blowing and water erosion. Typically the surface layer is brown and pale brow: Terracing also may be needed to control water erosion. loam about 10 inches thick. The upper 25 inches of the ui The potential native vegetation is dominated by blue derlying material is pale brown loam. The lower part to grama. Several mid grasses, such as western wheatgrass depth of 60 inches is pale brown fine sandy loam. and needleandthread, are also present. Potential produc- Permeability is moderate. Available water capacity i tion ranges from 1,600 pounds per acre in favorable years high. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or mor to 1,000 pounds in unfavorable years. As range condition Surface runoff is rapid, and the erosion hazard deteriorates, the mid grasses decrease; blue grama, buf- moderate. falograss, snakeweed, yucca, and fringed sage increase; This soil is suited to limited cropping. Intensic and forage production drops. Undesirable weeds and an- cropping is hazardous because of erosion. The croppir nuals invade the site as range condition becomes poorer. system should be limited to such close grown crops as a Management of vegetation on this soil should be based falfa, wheat, and barley. This soil also is suited to iL on taking half and leaving half of the total annual produc- rigated pasture. A suitable cropping system is 3 to tion. Seeding is desirable if the range is in poor condition. years of alfalfa followed by 2 years of corn and Km Sideoats grama, little bluestem, western wheatgrass, blue grain and alfalfa seeded with a nurse crop. grama, pubescent wheatgrass, and crested wheatgrass are Close grown crops can be irrigated from closely space suitable for seeding. The grass selected should meet the contour ditches or sprinklers. Contour furrows or sprit seasonal requirements of livestock. It can be seeded into klers should be used for new crops. Applications a clean, firm sorghum stubble, or it can be drilled into a nitrogen and phosphorus help in maintaining good produ firm prepared seedbed. Seeding early in spring has tion. proven most successful. The potential native vegetation is dominated by lab Windbreaks and environmental plantings of trees and grama. Sideoats grama, little bluestem, western whea shrubs commonly grown in the area are generally well grass, and sedge are also prominent. Potential productic suited to this soil. Cultivation to control competing ranges from 1,800 pounds per acre in favorable years vegetation should be continued for as many years as 1,500 pounds in unfavorable years. As range condith • possible following planting. Trees that are best suited and deteriorates, the sideoats grama and little blueste have good survival are Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern decrease; forage production drops; and blue grama, bu redcedar, ponderosa pine, Siberian elm, Russian-olive, and falograss, and several perennial forbs and shrubs i hackberry. The shrubs best suited are skunkbush sumac, crease. Undesirable weeds and annuals invade the site lilac, Siberian peashrub, and American plum. range condition becomes poorer. Wildlife is an important secondary use of this soil. The Management of vegetation should be based on tall: cropland areas provide favorable habitat for ring-necked half and leaving half of the total annual production. See pheasant and mourning dove. Many nongame species can ing is desirable if the range is in poor condition. Sideoa be attracted by establishing areas for nesting and escape grama, little bluestem, western wheatgrass, and p cover. For pheasants, undisturbed nesting cover is essen- bescent wheatgrass are suitable for seeding. The gra tial and should be included in plans for habitat develop- selected should meet the seasonal needs of livestock. ment, especially in areas of intensive agriculture. Range- can be seeded into a clean, firm sorghum stubble, or 921191 B 1321 REC 02273854 01/02/92 1 04 $10.00 1/002 F 1967 MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK 6 RECORDER WELD CO, CO AR227305V WARRANTY DEED 8w0Deu ante Fee .. THIS DEED, Made this 29th day of December, 1991 between 01W / /)yam••• Tollgate Pasty, Inc. $...ee.w.4.v2.....••'•• a corporation duly organised and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of COLORADO, grantor, and David N. Runt and Eaylsen J. Hunt whose legal address is 35877 NCR #45, Eaton, Colorado 80615 of the County of Weld and State of Colorado, grantees, wITNeslETEs That the granter, for and in consideration of the sum of ONd HUNDRED FORTY ONE TE0UBAMD AND 00/100, ($141,000.00) Dollars, the receipt and sufficiency of which !s hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, sold and conveyed, and by these dam presents does grant, bargain, sell, convey and senfira, ante the grantee, hi�soheirs sin ate,lyi goarenddabi albn the lrerent fyWeeld and Sttaate o PCoCovlwddoo,.described as � situate,iyiag !dgT 10 1p follows: The W1/2 of the NW1/4 of section 15, and all that part of the Wl/2 of the SW1/4 of section 15 lying North of the No. 2 Canal of the New Cache La Poudre Irrigation Company, all in Township 6 North, Range 66 West of the 6th P.N., County of Weld, State of Colorado, EXCEPTING therefrom any portion of the subject property located in the SW1/4 as contained in decree recorded December 5, 1890 in Book 98 at Page 460 and recorded January 19, 1906, in Book 228, at Page 557. TOGETHER WITH EXHIBIT 'A' ATTACHED HERETO INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE. also known by street and number as Vacant Land, Weld County, Colorado TOGETHER with all and singular the hereditament' and appurtenances thereto belonging, or in anywise appertaining, and the reversion and reversions, remainder and remainders, rants, issues and profits thereof, and all the estate, right, title, interest, claim and demand whatsoever of the grantor, either in law or equity, of, in and to the above bargained presiaee, with the bsreditaasnts and appurtenances. TO HAVE AND To SOLO the said premises above bargained and described, with the appurtenances, unto the grantee, his heirs end assigns forever. And the grantor, for ! self, its successors, does covenant, grant, bargain, and agree to and with the grantee, his heirs and assigns, that at the tine of the enseeling and delivery of these presents, it is well seised of the premises above conveyed, has good sure, perfect, absolute and indefeasible estate of inheritance, in law, in fan simple, and 1. has goad right, full power end lawful authority to grant, bargain, sell and convey the same in manner and foss as aforesaid, and that the sane are free and clear from all former end other grants, bargains, , liens, taxes, assessments, enssmbramees and restrictions of whatever hind es eaters sewer, except general taxes for 1992 and subsequent years; except easements, restrictions, covenants, conditions, reservations and righto of way of record, if any, The grantor shall and will WARRANT AND FOREVER DEFEND the above-bargained premises in the quiet and peaceable possession of the grantee, his heirs and assigns, against all and every person or persons lawfully claiming the whole or any part thereof. The singular number shell include•the plum', the plural the singular, and the nee of any gender shall be apppplicable to all genders. IN WITIESI NSEtiOF, the grantor has caused its corporate name to be hereunto subscribed by its president, and its corporate seal to be hereunto affixed, attested by its - Secretary, the day end year first above written. Attest La':.. j Tollgate Farms, Inc. v "k xf. Hy� [� " . ��:" BY �o, C. A. ,r() sew '-•-•'•. `0 isetW : Deborah A. Ferguson, P ldent - C 0.41‘...'. ,..- k . • STATE.Of COLORADO } 1 ) se. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me C-j4 4- County of Denver } this 29th -day of December, 1991, by Deborah A. Ferguson as President andJOO•C.OLe f k. (ekuNM ., as - Secretary of Tollgate Farms, Inc. My commission expires y 7-9,Z, W}taliw ny hand and official seal. ///7 //^Y/ sery . . \J:�ti)'. N Y PUBLIC ' Y3,014OB 6'.84 l t, i.1. 921191 • • • B 1321 REC 02273854 01/02/92 15:04 $10.00 2/002 F 1968 MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK 6 RECORDER WELD CO, CO • EXHIBIT 0A' • An undivided 2/3 interest .in Coal Bank Draw Seepage Ditch and LaGrange Seepage Ditch derived through agreement recorded in Book 1219 at Page 267, Weld County Records, and as decreed for Independent Non- Stream Ditch Priority No. 14N8 in Water District No. 3, State of Colorado, said Decree being recorded in Book 1370 at Page 498, Wald County Records, said undivided 2/3 interest including, but not by Way of limitation, the existing diversion structure, sump and connecting pipeline. Also included shall be the pumping plant and equipment connected therewith located in a sump in the Coal Bank Draw Seepage Ditch and LaGrange Seepage Ditch, together with a non-exclusive easement adjoining and immediately adjacent to the Wiest line of said property, 60 feet in width and approximately 200 feet long from the North boundary of said property to the present pumping plant situate along the West boundary of the property described above, together with a non-exclusive easement 6 feet wide on either side of the centerline of the established pumping and 1 1 running in a northeasterly tp direction tram said thence easterly allongNthehNorth lin of ehofpsaidpropertyitodthe easterly line of said property. r ..• • ,�... tri .DO[ CLI W • • 901191 PLANNED UNIT L .'ELOPMENT DISTRICT CHANGE OF ZON APPLICATION Department of Planning Services, 915 10th Street, Room 342 , Greeley, Colorado PHONE: 356-4000 Ext. 4400 FOR PLANNING DEPARTMENT USE ONLY: CASE NO. APPLICATION FEE DATE RECEIVED RECEIPT NO. APPLICATION CHECKED BY RECORDING FEE RECEIPT NO. rint or type on y except or requ re s gnatures. I (we) , the undersigned, hereby request hearings before the Weld County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners concerning the proposed PUD rezoning of the following described unincorporated area of Weld County, Colorado: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The W2 NW4 of Section 15, and all that part of the W2 of the SW4 of Section 15 lying North of the No. 2 Canal of the New Cache La Puudre Irrigation Company, all in T6N, R66W of the 6th P.M. Weld (bunty, Colorado (If additional space is required, attach an additional sheet) Property Address (if available) : 33610 Weld County Road 31 Greeley. (binrado PRESENT ZONE A (AgriculturaljROPOSED ZONE P.U.D. TOTAL ACREAGE q3 735 OVERLAY ZONES none SURFACE FEE (PROPERTY OWNERS) OF AREA PROPOSED FOR PUD REZONING: NAME: David and Kayleen Hunt HOME TELEPHONE:3564224 ADDRESS: 33610 Weld (Ygmfy Road 31 Greeley in A0631 BUS. TELEPHONE: NAME: HOME TELEPHONE: ADDRESS: BUS. TELEPHONE: APPLICANT OR AUTHORIZED AGENT (if different than above) : NAME: Brian Grubb HOME TELEPHONE: 7$6-1.661 ADDRESS: 1300 30th Street #E2-32 Boulder, Colorado 80303 BUS. TELEPHONE: OWNER(S) AND/OR LESSEES OF MINERAL RIGHTS ON OR UNDER THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES OF RECORD IN THE WELD COUNTY ASSESSOR' S OFFICE: NAME: David and Kayleen Hunt ADDRESS: 33610 Weld County Road 31 Greeley. Colorado 80631 NAME: Vernon P. Lauridsen ADDRESS: 1n1 71 y..e„ma Granley, Colorado Rn631 NAME: ADDRESS: I hereby depose and state under the penalties of perjury that all statements, proposals, and plans submitted with or contained within this application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. COUNTY OF WELD ) ) SS STATE OF COLORADO) — /r,� LL Signature : Signature: Owner or Authorized Agent Subscribed an 1)f pot fore me thi- ay of 19�`- 4b,.. - yn NOT Y PUBLIC My Commiss us-vxpires • 9C1191 POWER OF ATTORNEY / KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that I, ' ,D2'vcc �✓. f (name) , the undersigned, of 33`rc' L ' (/t 31 / 4rc e l' Co• y'dcj / (address) , County of /-,•-•4 (67{1 /e ( _, State of //�� CO/2ra �• , here- ' by constitute, make and appoint r%an 6,04,046A _ _ (name) , of /300 30 CIS/ re•fc 4, 6'2 -32 �✓�jaH/dee • 90307 . (address) , County of /JOwa•-. , State of Cry tc4 my true and lawful attorney- in-fact, for the following purpose : To represent me in the matter of the foregoing attached application for a _ a�e aT crone v42 _ (variance, recorded exemption, etc. ) , in regard to and only in regard to the particular J property described in said ap- plication, before the f,la7 4 ( d (Board of County Commissioners , Board of Adjustment, etc. ) and to present evidence on my behalf before said Board. ar—t6Lr Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of $ -- , 1Q c;)441_ • "a : ' No ry Pub is "r;*My comm.10sson expires : a Y� d--i . l_cl-1.S. nr 804-79-012 9:11.191 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS MINERALS AND/OR SUBSURFACE ESTATE Legal Description: The W2 NW4 and that part of the W2 SW4 lying north of the no. 2 canal of the New Cache La Poudre Irigation Company, all in Section 15, T6N, R66W of the 6th P.M. Weld County Colorado STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS COUNTY OF WELD THE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn, states that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names and addresses of all mineral owners and lessees of mineral owners on or under the parcel of land under consideration as their names appear upon the records in the Weld County Clerk and Recorder's Office or from an ownership update from a title or abstract company or an attorney. The foregoi instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me this /Q day of WLL_J[,j , 191' , WITNESS my hand and official 7T•'•. Notary ublic My Commission Expires: 1)04, l .'tJi, 19-IS' 9°1191 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS SURFACE ESTATE Legal Description: The w2 NW4 gpd that part of the W2 SW4 lying north of the no. 2 canal of the New Cache La Poudre Irrigation Ccnpany, all in Section 15, T6N, R66W of the 6th P.M. Weld County Colorado STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS COUNTY OF WELD THE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn, states that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names, addresses, and the corresponding Parcel Identification Number assigned by the Weld County Assessor of the owners' of property (the surface estate) within five hundred feet of the property under consideration. This list was compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor, or an ownership update from a title or abstract company or attorney, derived from such records, or from the records of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. The list compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor shall have been assembled within thirty days of the application's submission date. �rh The forei ing ins rument was subscribed and sworn to before me this l4" day �� , 19 WITNESS my hand a. : o 'cial seal. c• _ . ' Gi = Notary P;•lic .gsipsr' moires: .lt,�q�$ M y= a F (bvo�lo+� 9:1191 r. . . .„,„:"....„ .t._ .:‘,.. ,.,, HUNTER'S VIEW ESTATES eli„.., , , • . . A FDLANINIEp • ielNirr . .t"."4 h- vp 1.. „...,,e4...r.,4..r , vEvetPpriet•i-r .,.... T.,.....„,..„6.66.. . . 4,.6„,,,,,,$„4,.,... . 6,:: t �` r pry x� /PC i.p�.{... 6 .6. . •, • rY.. ST, 4 r la , ktik < < caLcgAp, LailarD clowit„ �. �. .' ..... t ...„...„ ,,,...„ :„„ ,. ., , i • ..... ,,, , . . ?.6 . , .... , . . ,, A ` „.. . ,..,... . M 9 :,1191 Hunter's Mew thtates Change of 7.on. and hnai flat Surrounding Property Owners within 500' Name and Address Parcel ID # Franklin R.Johnson Jr. 050515000035 15470 Weld County Road 70 Greeley, Colorado 80631 Natalie Sena clo Johnson Sena Farm 050515000036 15470 Weld County Road 70 Greeley, Colorado 80631 Douglas and Sonia Burron 050515000037 15374 Weld County Road 70 Greeley, Colorado 80631 Burman Chevrolet Company 080515000024 15741 Highway 392 Greeley, Colorado 80631 James and Lucille Stockover 080515000021 39 Ward Drive #201 080516000053 Greeley, Colorado 80634 Dwaine and Nancy Kurtz 080516000028 33693 Weld County Road 31 080516000032 Greeley, Colorado 80631 Wayn and Judith Leusink 080516000039 33751 Weld County Road 31 Greeley, Colorado 80631 Scott and Janice Rapp 080516000038 33835 Weld County Road 31 Greeley, Colorado 80634 William and Rosella Monson 080516000040 33877 Weld County Road 31 080516000041 Greeley, Colorado 80631 R.H. Farms Incorporated 050516000045 12315 Weld County Road 72 Eaton, Colorado 80615 Harold and Joyce Anderson/Ernest Nelson 080510000006 15295 Weld County Road 70 Greeley, Colorado 80631 617'/93 9:47 AM page6 921191 Hunt's View .:sue Change of rat .end Anal Plat Donald Carpenter 080509000005 14953 Weld County Road 70 Greeley, Colorado 80631 Carpenter Enterprises 080509000046 14953 Weld County Road 70 Greeley, Colorado 80631 Joseph and Elain Hoff 080509000045 34251 Weld County Road 31 Greeley, Colorado 80631 6/23/93 9:47 AM page7 PL0922 CASE - 931191 COZ483 THIS FILE CONTAINS PICTURE SLIDES AS EXHIBIT M. PLEASE SEE ORIGINAL FILE. r Hello