HomeMy WebLinkAbout930681.tiff RESOLUTION
RE: THE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, 1993, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
PETITION OF:
BECKER JAMES K
1818 12 ST
GREELEY, CO 80631
DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: PIN: R 3104386 PARCEL: 096107215017 - GR 2909-A
L5 BLK5 MAPLEWOOD%1818 12TH ST%
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado,
organized as the Board of Equalization for the purpose of adjusting, equalizing,
raising or lowering the assessment and valuation of real and personal property
within Weld County, fixed and made by the County Assessor for the year 1993, and
WHEREAS, said petition has been heard before the County Assessor and due
Notice of Determination thereon has been given to the taxpayer(s) , and
WHEREAS, the taxpayer(s) presented a petition of appeal of the County
Assessor's valuation for the year 1993, claiming that the property described in
such petition was assessed too high, as more specifically stated in said
petition, and
WHEREAS, said petitioner being present, and
WHEREAS, the Board has made its findings on the evidence, testimony and
remonstrances and is now fully informed.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld
County, acting as the Board of Equalization, that the evidence presented at the
hearing clearly supported the value placed upon the Petitioner's property by the
Weld County Assessor. Such evidence indicated the value was reasonable,
equitable, and derived according to the methodologies, percentages, figures and
formulas dictated to the Weld County Assessor by law. The assessment and
valuation of the Weld County Assessor shall be, and hereby is, affirmed as
follows:
930681
Page 2
RE: BOE - BECKER JAMES K
ORIGINAL
Land $ 12,250
Improvements OR
Personal Property 54,836
TOTAL ACTUAL VALUE $ 67,086
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a denial of a petition, in whole or in part, by
the Board of Equalization may be appealed by selecting one of the following three
options:
1. Board of Assessment Appeals: You have the right to appeal the
County Board of Equalization's (CBOE's) decision to the Board of
Assessment Appeals (BAA) . Such hearing is the final hearing at
which testimony, exhibits, or any other evidence may be
introduced. If the decision of the BAA is further appealed to
the Court of Appeals, only the record created at the BAA hearing
shall be the basis for the Court's decision. No new evidence can
be introduced at the Court of Appeals. (Section 39-8-108(10) ,
CRS)
Appeals to the BAA must be made on forms furnished by the
BAA, and should be mailed or delivered within thirty (30)
days of denial by the CBOE to:
Board of Assessment Appeals
1313 Sherman Street, Room 523
Denver, CO 80203
Phone: 866-5880
OR
2. District Court: You have the right to appeal the CBOE's decision
to the District Court of the county wherein your property is
located. New testimony, exhibits or any other evidence may be
introduced at the District Court hearing. For filing
requirements, please contact your attorney or the Clerk of the
District Court. Further appeal of the District Court's decision
is made to the Court of Appeals for a review of the record.
(Section 39-8-108(1) , CRS)
930681
Page 3
RE: BOE - BECKER JAMES K
OR
3. Binding Arbitration: You have the right to submit your case to
arbitration. If you choose this option the arbitrator's decision
is final and your right to appeal your current valuation ends.
(Section 39-8-108.5, CRS)
Selecting the Arbitrator: In order to pursue arbitration, you
must notify the CBOE of your intent. You and the CBOE select an
arbitrator from the official list of qualified people. If you
cannot agree on an arbitrator, the District Court of the county
in which the property is located will make the selection.
Arbitration Hearing Procedure: Arbitration hearings are held
within sixty days from the date the arbitrator is selected. Both
you and the CBOE are entitled to participate. The hearings are
informal. The arbitrator has the authority to issue subpoenas
for witnesses, books, records, documents and other evidence. He
also has the power to administer oaths, and all questions of law
and fact shall be determined by him.
The arbitration hearing may be confidential and closed to the
public, upon mutual agreement. The arbitrator's written decision
must be delivered to both parties personally or by registered
mail within ten (10) days of the hearing. Such decision is final
and not subject to review.
Fees and Expenses: The arbitrator's fees and expenses are agreed
upon by you and the CBOE. In the case of residential real
property, such fees and expenses cannot exceed $150.00 per case.
The arbitrator's fees and expenses, not including counsel fees,
are to be paid as provided in the decision.
930681
Page 4
RE: BOE - BECKER JAMES K
The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded,
adopted by the following vote onthe 28th day of July, A.D. , 1993.
I / cl : i/� /� BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ATTEST: J t /7 WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
Weld County Clerk to the Board C e «‘401--/
Constance H rb4rrt{,ry CJhaiigrma
BY: (Ltd
� /1 �-pA
Deputy Clerk o the—B=, W. H. ebster, Pr -Tem
APPROV AS TO FORM: /
P _ orge Baxte
ounty` A torney Dale K. Hall
EXCUSED
Barbara J. Kirkmeyer
930681
got ?3—
Se'"----7977)
BOE DECISION SHEET
PIN I!: R 3104386 PARCEL It: 096107215017
BECKER JAMES K
1818 12 ST
GREELEY, CO 80631
HEARING DATE: July 28, 1993 TIME: 2:00 P.M.
HEARING ATTENDED? l��'N) NAME:
AGENT NAME:
APPRAISER NAME: ,€,
DECISION:
DECREASE IN VALUATION
INCREASE IN VALUATION
NO CHANGE IN VALUATION yj
ASSESSMENT RATIO
ACTUAL VALUATION
ORIGINAL ADJUSTED
Land $ 12,250 $
Improvements OR
Personal Property 54,836 -3-11 ) g34,
Total Actual Value $ 67, 086 $ /,, 7 ) D g
COMMENTS:
MOTION BY :g ct7 TO tb�- �� e e—
SECONDED BY a Baxter -- ON)
Hall -- (15N)
x Failed to meet bur t i of pro6€ri g-c.-.'-t— Harbert -- ON)
Comparables inadequate Kirkmeyer -- .(Y/N)41-(e t
Other: Webster -- (4O04)
RESOLUTION NO.
930681
OFFICE OF COUNTY ASSESSOR
1400 NORTH 17th AVE.
GREELEY, COLORADO 80631
ND TICE o ) N IAL PHONE (303) 353-3845, EXT. 3656
ti
GP 2909-A LS RLKS MAPLEWOOD%1818 12TH ST%
COLORADO
1811 12 ST + ( GRT LEY
OWNER DECKER JAMES K
REEK≥-P. ,JAMES K
PARCEL O96ia72t9,17
SIN R 3V)4386
181 ') 12 S T YEAR 1993
Cr' +iJ631
LOG 01724
x/25/1993
The appraised value of property is based on the appropriate consideration of the approaches to value required by law. The Assessor has determined
that your property should be included in the following category(ies):
RESIDENTIAL "RoArRTY IS VALUED 8Y CONSIDERING THE MARKET APPROACH.
AGRICULTURAL LAND VALUE IS DETERMINED SOLELY `3Y THE EARNING OR PRODUCTIVE
CA?ACITY OF THE LAND, CAPITALIZED AT A PATE SET 9Y LAW.
ALL OTHER P.rr)PERTY, INCLUDING VACANT LAN*), IS VALUED BY CONSIDERING THE COST,
MARKET, A►vC) INCOME APPPOACHES•
If your concern is the amount of your property tax, local taxing authorities (county, city, fire protection, and other special districts) hold
budget hearings in the fall. Please refer to your tax bill or ask your Assessor for a listing of these districts,and plan to attend these budget hearings.
The Assessor has carefully studied all available information, giving particular attention to the specifics included on your protest and has deter-
mined the valuation(s) assigned to your property. The reasons for this determination of value are;
YOUR PROPERTY HAS PEN UNIFORMLY VALUED FOLLOWING COLORADO LAW AND
INSTZUCTIDNS PURLISHED 3Y THE STATE DIVISION OF PROPERTY TAXATION.
YOUR 'ROTFST OF VALUE HAS REEN DENIED DUE TO COMPARISON OF OTHF4
SIMILAR PROPERTIES WHICH SOLD DUPING THE 1991/ 1992 TIME PERI3f),
THIS COMPARISON SHOWS YOUR ACTUAL PROPERTY VALUE TO 9F. CORRECT FOR
THAT PERIOD,
PROPERTY CLASSIFICATION PETITIONER'S ASSESSOR'S VALUATION
ESTIMATE ACTUAL VALUE ACTUAL VALUE
OF VALUE PRIOR TO REVIEW AFTER REVIEW
LAN!) 12. 260 12. 250
IMPS
54, 836 54,836
TOTALS $ $
you have the right to appeal 6 7, I A$ 6, 9 O R 6
If you disagree with the Assessor's decision,
g to the County Board of Equalization for further consideration,
39-8-106(1)(a),C.R.S. Please see the back of this form for detailed information on filing your appeal.
By: WARREN L. LASELL 06/0 1/ 3
WELD COUNTY ASSESSOR 11
15-DPI AR (�[� �/�� 45
DATE
Form PR-207-87/93 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON REVERSE SIDE 9fi1 -
ICU HAVE. hE MGR'S' O , PPw At rI .. ASSESS:6o ,R .st is ION
Initt doom, Board ter Equalization will sit to hear appeals beginning July l and continuo hrough August 10 for
- e myymed (land and buildings) and personal property (1urni:shings, machinery. ana eqmomenty 39-8-104 and
39-8 3 07 C R.S.
APPEAL PROCEDURES:
If you hs ; e to appeal the Assessor's decision, mail or deliver one copy of this completed form to the :t3
Board r3 .Equalization. To preserve your right to appeal, your appeal must be POSTMARKED OR DELIVERED ON
OR BEFORE JULY 15 FOR REAL PROPERTY, AND JULY 20 FOR PERSONAL PROPERTY.
WELD COUNTY BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
915 10th Street, MO. €3ox 758
Greeley, Colorado 80632
Telephone (303) 3564000, Ext, 4225
NOTIFICATION OF HEARING:
You w t be notified of the time and place set for the hearing of your appeal.
COUPES BOARD OF EQUALIZATION'S DETERMINATION '
The County Board of Equalization must make a decision on your appeal and mail you a determination within five
business days, The County Board must conclude their hearings by August 10.
TAXPAYER EIGHTS FOR FURTHER APPEALS:
If you are not ,atisfiied with the County Board of Equalization's decision, you must fife within thirty days of the
County Board of Equalization's written decision with ONE of the following: '
Board of Assessment Appeals (SAA):
paritoot the BAA at 1313 Sherman, Room 315, Denver, Colorado 80203, (303+ 866-5880
District Court:
9th Avenue and 9th Street, P.,O, Box C
Greeley, Colorado 88632
Telephone MOM r 3511 3'000, Ext 5≤2i
Arbitration::
WELD COUNTY BOARD OF FO,UAd CATION
131E 10:h 83 44 6,0, Box 758 . .
C'.i onion v ruatt) 80632 e ax loo, , , ,6,: 3050,0, Ex[. 422
5
If you do not r.,c „r t,s determination from the c.!'}S,i ".{Board of FaLialiZation you CSiusi the,cc, 185.e< JI e,gee idsara
of Assessment Aopeais by September 20,
PPECERVE YOUR APPEAL RIGHT a, YOU MUST PROVE YOU HAVE FILED A TIMELY APPEAL;
THEREFORE, WE RECOMMEND ALL CORRESPONDENCE OND NC .61E MARLED a1d T ri 431_—C OF MA:E:z•.' ..
aostml ON TO THE ..8 erre 804 OF EDUAL,LhadDIN
Pm fineibe a:pieIn why you disagree tote the Assessor's ,af *,ri A, EANS r
3:9- t, 16:1 MEL '5 OU MU;>", STATE r .,+€-'.R OP: it)N 'if., 1/FLUE €N Der1MS 05 t301,3,3032 LF.., e P
AMOUNT. y, .'a r€ t:csttai docatmepts a necessary,
FLA.erp,22,k), ae Art-4-7 604,241000,
, 453 Lien 4ccsow- Vl
1 ern-e- G e, Nita_ � 7 OiJc�y
• I G / x - _93
� _ %k
drieraD grander
LICENSED APPRAISER (FEDERAL)
213 42ND AVENUE
GREELEY, COLORADO 80634
TELEPHONE (303) 356-1254
DATE : JUNE 28 , 1992
TO : FIRST FEDERAL BANK
RE : RECERTIFICATION OF 1818 12TH STREET - BECKER
I HAVE REVIEWED MY ORIGINAL APPRAISAL DATED MARCH 2 , 1992 OF THE
SUBJECT PROPERTY LOCATED. AT 1818 12TH STREET, GREELEY, COLORADO.
IT IS MY OPINION, AFTER BRIEFLY CONSIDERING THE ADDITIONAL SALES
OF 1825 13TH STREET - $66 , 500 5/12/92 AND 1122 19TH AVENUE -
$62 , 500 3/27/92 , THAT THE ORIGINAL MARKET VALUE ESTIMATE OF
$62 ,000 IS A FAIR REPRESENTATION OF THE VALUE OF THE SUBJECT
PROPERTY.
THE MARKET CONDITIONS HAVE REMAINED STRONG TO SLIGHTLY INCREASING
SINCE THE DATE OF THE ORIGINAL APPRAISAL .
RESf,E TFULLY YOURS ,
SHARB�I•
E
LICENSED APPRAISER #ALO 16946
•
"r.
930681
LA]
:../„.
# ` ,
Property'Description a Analysis UN►r.JRM RESIDENTIAL APPRAISAL_.EPORT rOFile No. R13292
Property Address 1818 12TH STREET Census Tract CT— 4 . 02 LENDER DISCRETIONARY USE
City GREELEY County WELD Stale CO Zip Code 80631 Sale Price
Legal Description LOT 5 , BLOCK 5 , MAPLEWOOD $
Owner/Occupant BECKER Date
o
Map Reference WELD Mortgage Amount $
Sale Price$ N/A Date of Sale N/A PROPERTY RIGHTS APPRAISED Mortgage Type
Loan charges/concessions to be paid by seller$N/A n Fee Simple Discount Points and Other Concessions
' R.E.Taxes $ 752 . 00 Tax Year 1991 HOA S/Mo. N/A n Leasehold Paid by Seller $
Lender/Client FIRST FEDERAL n Condominium(HUD/VA)
LOCATION 1E I De Minimis PUD Source
X I Urban Li Suburban F IRural NEIGHBORHOOD ANALYSIS Good Avg. FM Poor
BUILT UP • n Over 75% n 25-75% Under 25% Employment D X❑
GROWTH RATE n P oymenl Stability
n Rapid Stable DM
O O
El n Slow Convenience to Employment
PROPERTY VALUES n Increasing X Stable n Declining Convenience to Shopping
DEMAND/SUPPLY n Shortage in Balance
MARKETING TIME n n Over Supply Convenience to Schools � � O n
(Xj Under 3 Mos. n 3-6 Mos. n Over 6 Mos. Adequacy of Public Transportation pi a i
n• n
PRESENT LAND USE % LAND USE CHANGE PREDOMINANT SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING Recreation Facilities
Single Family 7 0 Not Likely PRICE AGE X
= n OCCUPANCY $(000) (yrs) Adequacy of Utilities O ❑
• 2-4 Family 30 Likely n Owner Q Property Compatibility O a n n
Multi-family In process n n Tenant n4- 5 Low 32 Protection from Detrimental Cond.
Commercial To: Vacant(0-5%) n n n• n
Industrial F1 n 7- 0 fags 50 Police& Fire Protection EI 0 ED
_ Vacant(over 5% Predominant General Appearance of Properties n n n• n
Vacant 55— 40 Appeal to Market El (R n n
Note:Race or the racial composition of the neighborhood are not considered reliable appraisal factors. The subject property is
COMMENTS: located in a popular, mature subdivision. The homes are generally well
kept and many are used as basement apartments . The subject neighborhood
has a good mix of needed facilities such as schools , shopping at a convenient
distance , etc . il
Dimensions 50 ' x 196 ' Topography LEVEL
Site Area 9 , 800 sq . ft .f t . Corner Lot NO Size LARGE
Zoning Classification R-2(multi—family) Zoning Compliance YES Shape RECTANGULAR
HIGHEST & BEST USE:Present Use YES Other Use NO Drainage ADEQUATE
UTILITIES Public Other SITE IMPROVEMENTS Type Public Private View' RESIDENTIAL
Electricity n Street BLACKTOP p] n Landscaping AVERAGE
Gas Q Curb/Gutter CONCRETE - n n Driveway CONCRETE
Water Q Sidewalk CONCRETE X n Apparent Easements TYPICAL PUE
Sanitary Sewer n Street Lights OVERHEAD El CI FEMA Flood Hazard Yes' No X
Storm Sewer MO Alley GRAVEL n n FEMA'Map/Zone 080184 0002 B
COMMENTS(Apparent adverse easements,encroachments,special assessments,slide areas,etc.): The subject shares a drive with
the house to the East . This arrangement has worked well in the past and
doesn' t appear to adversely affect the subject property .
GENERAL DESCRIPTION EXTERIOR DESCRIPTION FOUNDATION BASEMENT INSULATION
Units ONE Foundation CONCRETE Slab NO Area Sq.FL 1 ,0 91 ' Root O
Stories 1 . 0 Exterior Walls FR. SIDING Crawl Space NO %Finished 90% Ceiling 0
Type(Det./Att.) DETACHED Roof Surface ASPHALT Basement ' YES Ceiling ACOUST. TILE Walls
El
Design(Style) RANCH Gutters& Dwnspts. METAL Sump Pump NO Walls DW/PANELINGMoor
El
Existing YES Window Type WOOD 1 PANE Dampness NONE NOTED Floor CARPET None O Proposed Storm Sash YES Settlement NORMAL Outside Entry YES AdequacyA V E . n
' Under Construction Screens YE S Infestation NONE Energy Efficient Items:
Age(Yrs.) 34 Manufactured House NO NOTED STORM WNDS
Effective Age(Yrs.) 16
ROOMS Foyer Living Dining Kitchen Den Family Rm. Rec.Rm. Bedrooms # Baths Laundry ea Sq.Ft.
Basement Other Area
1 ,091
Level 1
Level2 1 1 1 2 1 YES 1 , 091
•
Finished area show grade contains: 5 Rooms; 2 Bedroom(s); 1 . 0 Bath(s); 1 , 091 Square Feet of Gross Living Area
SURFACES Materials/Condition HEATING KITCHEN EQUIP. ATTIC IMPROVEMENT ANALYSIS Good Avg. Fair Pont
Floors CRPT/HRDWOOD A Type F .A. Refrigerator n N• one n Q• uality of Construction Q 0 Q O
Walls PLASTER A Fuel N. G. Range/Oven n Stairs n C• ondition of Improvements ODE.. Trim/Finish STND. WOOD A Condition AVE Disposal [x Drop Stair n R• oom Sizes/Layout O 0 n Q
Bath Floor CARPET A Adequacy AVE Dishwasher n S• cuttle TO C• losets and Storage n Q n n
Bath Wainscot C E RAM I C A COOLING Fan/Hood n F• loor n E• nergy Efficiency D
0 O a
n
? Doors FLUSH—MAHOG. A Central NO Compactor Heated n Plumbing-Adequacy&Condition X _
Other NO Washer/Oryerj I Finished El Electrical-Adequacy& Condition
pi pi
Condition Microwave n n Kitchen Cabinets-Adequacy&CS. n n• n n Fireplace(U WOOD S TV. # 1 Adequacy Intercom Compatibility to Neighborhood n n• n n
rn CAR STORAGE: Garage [X I Attached Li Adequate X House Entry _ Appeal& Marketability EDOO
No. Cars 1 Carport n D• etached n Inadequate Outside Entry n Estimated Remaining Economic Life 40 Yrs.
a Condition AVG G. None n B• uilt-In n Electric Door n Basement Entry(] E• stimated Remaining Physical Life N/A Yrs.
Additional features: Living has coved ceilings and wood stove , kitchen appliances are
avacado green , kitchen cabinets are painted yellow main floor bath has pink
fixtures. Identical floor plan in bent . apt. , hot tub & cedar fence-backyard.
Depreciation(Physical, functional and external Inadequacies,repairs needed,modernization,etc.): Physical : General deferred
maintenance typcial for age .
I Functional : Outdated floorplan and decor, typical for age . 9306131.. General market conditions and prevalence and Impact In subject/market area regarding loan discounts,Interest buydowns and concessions: The market in
the ' Greeley area is strong fuelled by low interest S vacancy rates . Financing
is available without discount points by_ sellera , so when comparables are
Valuation Section UN'"ORM RESIDENTIAL APPRAISAL ^EPORT FIN No. R13292
2 9 2
Purpose of Appraisal is to estimate Market Value alined in the Certification 8 Statement of Limiting Cono _;.
BUILDING SKETCH(SHOW GROSS LIVING AREA ABOVE GRADE) ESTIMATED REPRODUCTION COST-NEW-OF IMPROVEMENTS:
a to Fredde Mac or Fannie Here,show only spare loot calculations and cost approach comments in this space.
Dwelling 1 ,O91 Sq. Ft. IRIS 37 . 00 = $ 40, 367
WIDTH x LENGTH x # STRY ' S = TOTAL BSMT 1 , O91Sq.Ft.®$ 12 . 00 =
x 13 , 092
x = Extras WOOD STOVE 1 , 000
4 x 17 x 1 . 0 = 68 APPLIANCE ALLOWANCE 1 , 365
33 x 31 x 1 . 0 = 1 , 0 2 3 Special Energy Efficient Items HOT TUB = 3 , 500
x x
Porches,Patios, etc. PATIO SLAB 500
•
a x x = Garage/Carport 308 Sq.Ft.®$ 16 . 00 = 4 ,928
• x x = Total Estimated Cost New = $ 64, 752
x x =
Physical Functional External
•
x x =
Less
x x — Depreciation 9 , 713 7 , 77 0 = $ 17 , 483
fJ 1 , 091 Depreciated Value of Improvements = $ 47 , 269
COST DATA BASED ON AVERAGE QUALITY ESTIMATED SITE( landscaping,etc.) _$ 2 , 000
VALUE ay
FACTORS OF COST MANUAL. SEE DEPRECIATION (It leasehold, show only leasehold value.) $ 12 ,000
COMMENTS ON PREVIOUS PAGE .
INDICATED VALUE BY COST APPROACH
(Not Required by Freddi I I = $ 61 , 769
Does Property conlor -rnisini a1 WI lueestimate Construction Warranty I 1 Yes X No
Y nbilihalOPaoab181H4DAWInPlatdlbraMgdards7 Yes. (i No Name of Warranty Program
If No,explain: First!Octal Savings Bank of Golordo
Only,ann n not ro id ad relied upon Warranty Coverage Expires
m m
The undersigned has replbd K.palexecei t asishwptflseragatemst similar and proximate to subject and has considered these in the market ens is.The de
adjustment,reflecting market:omplpe tpairlaKIKrBPEJa1 ficant variation between the subject and cn's description pr pe includes ylea dollar
to.or more favorable than, the subject property,a minus jl(—)adjustment is made, thus reducing the indicated value of ub subject;
if significant item to the comparable arab Is eri rrbr
or less favorable than,the subject property,a plus(4)adjustment Is made,thus increasing the indicated value of the subject. k significant gem M the comparable Is Interior to,
ITEM i SUBJECT COMPARABLE NO. I COMPARABLE NO.2 COMPARABLE NO.3
Address 1818 12TH 1805 13TH STREET 1819 11TH STREET 1728 15TH AVENUE
ST.G__REELES GREELEY GREELEY GREELEY
Proximity to Subject I MN ] MN 1 BLOCK 1 BLOCK • 8 BLOCKS
Sales Price $ A $ 57 500Price/Gross Liv,Area $ 0 . 000 $II III 59 . 4001
91. 40 O1111 1111 11111111 1$1111111 I 54 . 970 7 IIIIIIIII I II IIIIIIIII$ 54 750 $ II 1111 53 11 000
III IIIIIII I
Data Source INSPECT IOF AGENT ,MLS/PUB . REC AGENT,MLS/PUB .REC AGENT,MLS PUB REC
VALUE ADJUSTMENTS DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION I *HS Adjustment DESCRIPTION I +l-)S Adjustment DESCRIPTION I •(-IS A*stmed
SalesorFinancing IIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIII I FHA—LOAN25 POINT( CASH SALE ; FHA LOAN
Concessions NO CONCESS
Date of Sale/Time 3 2 . 2 , 1, 0 POINTS
10 91 8/91
Ih Location MAPLEWOOD MAPLEWOOD ; GREELEY ; MOORES SUR
Site/View 9 ,800 ' /AVC 6 , 8OO/BU81 3 , 500 6 030 ' /AVd 1 , 500 6 , 26O/G000
-J Design and Appeal FRME/RANCF FRME/RANCH FRME/RANCH FRME/RANCH 2 Duality of Construction AVERAGE AVERAGE t i AVERAGE ,
AVERAGE '
Age 34 40 EST ., 51 53
;
. Condition AVRq_gE AVER GE ; GOOD GOOD
Above Grade Total I Odors, Baths Total Iedrms, Baths i Total ,Odious, Baths
Room Count 5 ; 2 ;1 . 0 5 ; 2 1 l Total ,ed,ms, Baths
5 ; 2 ' 1 4 ; 2 ; 1
' Gross Living Area 1 . 0 91 Sq.Ft. 968 Sq.Ft. 1 2 .460 996 Sq. Ft. 1 , 900 948 Sq.Ft. 2, 860
. Basement 8 Finished 1 , 091 896 816 ' 948 '
LARobms8elowGrade 90% GD .AM1 80% GD .AMII 2 , 500 80% GD .AMT 3 , 000 50% ROUGH 5 , 000
F=604 8614 AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE
-� Heating/Cooling FANG/NONE FANG/NONE AVERAGE
to Garage/Carport FANG/NONE FANG/NONE
1 CAR DET 2—CAR—DET —2 , 500 1 CAR DETJ 2 CAR DET . —2 , 500
Porches,Patio, PATIO SLAT i
Pools,etc. .�II'
Special Energy STORM WNW STORM WND STORM WND3 STORM WND4
Efficient Items. NO SPRKLR. SPRINKLER ; —1 , 500 NO SPRKLR.; NO SPRKLR,1
Fireplace(s) WOOD STV. NONE ; 500 NONE 500 NONE 500
Other(e.g.kitcheit STAND. LINE STAND. LINK STAND . LINK STAND .LINK
equip.,remodeling) HOT TUB_ NONE 1 ,000 NONE 1 ,000 HOT TUB 1 000
Net Adj.(total) _ -1(..+ _ —:$ 5 , 960 X + — '
I III I IIIS 63 , 460 $ 7 , 900 X + �_IS 6 , 860
Indicated Value III I II III
I
of Subject $ 62 , 650 $ 59 ,860
r' Comments on Sales Comparison: Comp 1 sale older than 6 months less than 1 yr . used due to
limited supply of competive homes in similar location . Comp 1 was located on
well traversed street , comp 3 near an exclusive *
INDICATED VALUE BY SALES COMPARISON APPROACH
park . Comps 2 & 3 older a g e
$ 62 ,000
III INDICATED VALUE BY INCOME APPROACH(If Applicable)Estimated Market Rent$ 700 . 00 /Mo. x Gross Rent Multiplier 85 -$ 59 , 500
This appraisal is made I Xl "as is"El subject to the repairs,alterations,inspections or conditions listed below n completion per plans and specifications.
CommentsandConditionsolAppraisal: but in good condition so no age/cndtn. adjustment made .
Comp 2 was most similar to subject . The subject has not sold in the past 12
FinalReconciliation: months . GRM & est . gross rent based on mis sold statistics . Income
amproach given limited weight as most probable buyer would at least partially
owner occupy . Cost approach considered buy most weight to sales approach .
This appraisal is based upon the above requirements, the certification,contingent and limiting conditions,and Market Value definition that are stated in
n FmHA,HUD 8/a VA instructions.
alFreddie Mac Form 439(Rev.7/86)/Fannie Mae Form 10048(Rev. 7/86) filed with client 19 . 1 X attached.
I (WEI ESTIMATE THE MARKET VALUE, AS DEFINED, OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AS OF MARCH 2 , lO 92 to be$ 62 ,000
I (We) certify: that to the best of my (our) knowledge and belief the facts and data used herein are true ark correct; that I (we) per nally in both inside and out,and have made an exterior inspection of all comparable sales cited in this report;and Iha 1t� the subject property,
th
L (we) a interest prtrlyFagoec Iva therein.
APPRAISER(S) /I /T 9 �jb�l
/, n M i ? REVIEW APPRAISER
Signature � �J `,,1��-), ;�/r (if applicable)Sgnalu �1��, C"/ �h Did R
Name SHARA M. BRUt4LEY JI Iperyot
Name , ,_ G ARR SRA ` Inspect Property
r,..,,,•.se.• rrnm>n ovum „n..r„ � nvr:,,,..,.n,„,.., ,,..,..,..•.,.
•
zo ' Alley
N 89°z9' w 50.00
r' •
F
32.8 .
52- -
•
Iz
(11
P
13.3
f (Fl °'"ec,ara9ez4o�' QQ ��
0.0}.*
firCunC Eaves- ; • • Hot • •
Ga►"03c . � ;:.00 rub . Scale la Z0
8
o.z±k 14.E .. : ,
•
• H1� O
51.0
.
•
1 Story 4'rnme
•
Pa/ 'Bs
orvtF. 7
JoirrF )
hive
n
13 Z ! •
� 17.5 -i .t.5•
.C. .
Q CC
• 2 annter5
+5:3.— ' o S
M
N8?°zq'Vw
5• 1.13 , t 0.00'.Tht •
• ' •5.0' wcUk.. . } •
17.7
- h
•
. . :7 •
1Z S-h-eek
930681
MCRAE & SHORT INr. 1711 . ttth A .°n,.n r.r° 1°„ r,.L..n,t nnnn4 . Q7(l7'7
•
•
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Lot 5, Block 5,
MAPLEWOOD,
City of Greeley, Weld County, Colorado
1818 - 12th Street
•
•
United Title N U5891 (BECKER)
PAGE I of 2.
• IMPROVEMENT LOCATION CERTIFICATE •
Pins Found
I hereby certify that this Improvement location certificate was prepared for:
FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK OF COLORADO G UNITED TITLE CO. OF Gft >j "S..,
�Q. a,'d� `••.
not a Land Survey Plat or Improvement Survey Plat,and that it Is not to be relied upon for the .07 & Mc��.%
establishment of fence, building, or other future Improvement lines.I further certify that the Improvements on the above described parcel on this date,MARCH 16. 1992 except utility connections,are entirely within the boundariesof the parcel,except as shown,that there ere no encroachments upon the described premises
by Improvements on any adjoining premises, except as Indicated, and that there Is no
apparent evidence or sign of any easement crossing or burdening any part of sold parcel,
except as noted.
C•�' C ‘,/,�d � MCR reE &e .SHORT, INC.
• CLG Greeley.Colorado
GERALD 8. FlcRAE, PROJECI NUMBER
R.gt.l.rad Lind Donator 930681 Q2 D37
Colorado Rag. No. 66 16
•
\
CLERK TO THE BOARD
P.O. BOX 758
II ' GREELEY,COLORADO 80632
C. (303)3561000 EXT.4225
COLORADO
July 9, 1993
Parcel No. : 096107215017 PIN No. : R 3104386
BECKER JAMES K
1818 12 ST
GREELEY, CO 80631
Dear Petitioner(s) :
The Weld County Board of Equalization has set a date of Wednesday, July
28, 1993, at or about the hour of 2:00 P.M. , to hold a hearing on your
valuation for assessment. This hearing will be held at the Weld County
Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado, in the First Floor
Hearing Room.
You have a right to attend this hearing and present evidence in support of
your petition. The Weld County Assessor will be present before the Board.
The Board will make their decision on the basis of the record made at the
aforementioned hearing, as well as your petition, so it would be in your
interest to have a representative present. If you plan to be represented
by an agent or an attorney at your hearing, prior to the hearing you shall
provide, in writing to the Clerk to the Board's Office, an authorization
for the agent or attorney to represent you. If you do not choose to
attend this hearing, a decision will still be made by the Board by the
close of business on August 5, 1993, and mailed to you on or before August
10, 1993.
Because of the volume of cases before the Board of Equalization, all cases
shall be limited to 15 minutes. Also due to volume, cases cannot be
rescheduled. It is imperative that you provide evidence to support your
position. This may include evidence that similar homes in your area are
valued less than yours or you are being assessed on improvements you do
not have. Please note: The fact that your valuation has increased cannot
be your sole basis of appeal. Without documented evidence as indicated
above, the Board will have no choice but to deny your appeal.
930681
BECKER JAMES K - R 3104386
Page 2
At least two (2) working days prior to your hearing the Assessor will have
available, at your request, the data supporting his valuation of your
property.
Please advise me if you decide not to keep your appointment as scheduled.
If you need any additional information, please call me at your
convenience.
Very truly yours,
go
BO O/ EQU LIZAA I
Donald D. Warden,
Clerk to the Board
BY:
arol A. Har ing, Depu
cc: Warren Lasell, Assessor
I
T99OC6 �r_ 001 T-----�) ; .I -9J f �(
_, a ' 0 5 . ---9
T co r
0
3
� —t
z
w
2
I-
1 •
0 rad
m ve r
a a 0' 9 {�
o (/1 '9 `'
I .4 -f 1 V' 1 1 -t
cc
°m � 1 �� ��1` 4r
bAll
L a�34 � Vmg
Z
0�. �a �
w o - -e -a 4 $
0.< 03_1 -:1 9
aH 2-
it
Cl) w iii
L O o° �° i,/� ai . . cr J^J mma
m - a
Q 20—
3 1 '`' iy4
Q r CC Jai
(9 Ili
0 ? w Y g ct le ci e
U. ti. ZL.
�} w s fi
W ,9 w � w — 11 ? _. °
....I omc aP-I t 4 '- 14 -- _ / M C ' -- ao
Q a } Q t O' l�- 'vJ a Li.. 1 - L o
u) a
-5.3 _pr 06 a Ibr) 4 g ,_ FL _...9
Cr) 9 -- N
O 01
� � % 0 .g. /
----II
m ,
z 0.
°z ,.-
0:2 i r L=...5 g
w
H O -- 4 4 z
LL 0 i 7 t7 L7' LA
w . &vo - - 4 vi S)
o
I
z
oa r f+ rtli , 1- l w
01 di m
z a o z 1 2cn 1.0,/*1 1--. 0 0 s.9 On 1) i O 3 2 lii
Cr
co 0 -4i 3 (6 r- j — rog — O — (_; •-•
co cc
►- O J --- , r a- cT
w w cc ,1 til# 00 f'(1 Q (2) J- o
o n E od a E op E 4 O- t CS
AS0027
930681
EXHIBIT A IS PHOTOS - SEE ORIGINAL FILE
189026 -
CH
W W
• co ft",
co E
U t U
W 0
CO o 'x
F C
m
CV
v] a
W W OD
COd
h H
g8Tf TT1a
11Y1 �1X! P
f
17
`1a
44
II
••,9n
il
W ; I I ,4
lid
V 1 `
11,'
—
930681
f1
r I r qC" I
Imp
a
8 ON
tie
ea14 e
" :4.4. fir
i• jI (i.
w i ii
p
fliar.ra
f
iii
II
� h
4
ze90es
930681
4.
ry
ver - __
.r fi
�� II 1
IOi`J II
i-
t/! 1
II
I V Slw , .,
I in I $
„ !
I iI
I
i.
WO V" II VIIII
III i
il
IIIhgI
r1
fir!'
Hello