The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About940456.tiff_ .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. RESOLUTION RE: APPROVE SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT 111042 FOR A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING ON A LOT LESS THAN THE MINIMUM LOT SIZE IN THE A (AGRICULTURAL) ZONE DISTRICT - HUBERT AND ALEXANDRA HAYWORTH WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners held a public hearing on the 18th day of May, 1994, at the hour of 10:00 a.m. in the Chambers of the Board for the purpose of hearing the application of Hubert and Alexandra Hayworth, P.O. Box 270828, Fort Collins, Colorado 80527, for a Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit #1042 for a single family dwelling on a lot less than the minimum lot size in the A (Agricultural) Zone District on the following described real estate, to-wit: Part of the NIS?NW4 of Section 14, Township 1 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado WHEREAS, Hubert Hayworth, applicant, was present, and WHEREAS, Section 24.4.2 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance provides standards for review of said Special Review Permit, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners heard all of the testimony and statements of those present, studied the request of the applicant and the recommendations of the Weld County Planning Commission and all of the exhibits and evidence presented in this matter and, having been fully informed, finds that this request shall be approved for the following reasons: 1. The submitted materials are in compliance with the application requirements of Section 24. 7 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 2. It is the opinion of the Board of County Commissioners that the applicant has shown compliance with Section 24.4.2 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: PL0955 940456 �l D 9,C5- ('e1 ��/�� n'AYttiz,/'r/t SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT #1042 - HAYWORTH PAGE 2 a. The proposal is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan's Residential and Urban Growth Boundary goals and policies. The proposal is located within the urban growth boundary area of the City of Fort Lupton and presented no conflict with its interest. b. The proposal is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan's Agricultural goals and policies. The applicant has demonstrated a diligent effort has been made to conserve productive agricultural land in the locational decision for the proposed use. c. The proposal is consistent with the intent of the A (Agricultural) Zone District and is provided for as a Use by Special Review. d. The uses permitted will be compatible with the existing surrounding land uses which include rural residences, agricultural production, oil and gas production, and with future development of the surrounding area as permitted by the A (Agricultural) Zone District. e. No overlay districts affect the site. f. Special Review Permit Development Standards will provide adequate protection of the health, safety, and welfare of the neighborhood and County. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the application of Hubert and Alexandra Hayworth for a Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit 111042 for a single family dwelling on a lot less than the minimum lot size in the A (Agricultural) Zone District on the hereinabove described parcel of land be, and hereby is, granted subject to the following conditions: 1. The attached Development Standards for the Special Review Permit shall be adopted and placed on the Special Review plat prior to recording the plat. The plat shall be delivered to the Department of Planning Services and be ready for recording in the Weld County Clerk and Recorder's Office within 15 days of approval by the Board of County Commissioners. 2. The Special Review activity shall not occur nor shall any building or electrical permits be issued on the property until the Special Review plat is ready to be recorded in the office of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. 940456 SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT #1042 - HAYWORTH PAGE 3 The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 18th day of May, A.D. , 1994. Lek& BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: WELD COUNTY, C LORADO Weld County Clerk to the Board / 12),21,2' W. H. Webster, C airm BY: L /(110,a-CULJ eputy C1 k to the Board Dale Ky Hall, P o;Te APPR TO FORM: X George/h . Baxter County Attor ey onstance L. Harbert EXCUSED Barbara J. Kirkmeyer 940456 SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS HUBERT AND ALEXANDRA HAYWORTH USR #1042 1. The Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit is for a single family dwelling on a lot less than the minimum lot size in the A (Agricultural) Zone District as submitted in the application materials on file and subject to the Development Standards stated herein. 2. Approval of this plan may create a vested property right pursuant to Section 90 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 3. The applicant shall consult with the Brighton Soil Conservation District regarding tree and shrub plantings suitable for this site. 4. All construction on the property shall be in accordance with the requirements of the Weld County Building Code Ordinance. 5. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Design Standards of Section 24.5 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 6. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Operation Standards of Section 24.6 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 7. Personnel from the Weld County Health Department and Weld County Department of Planning Services shall be granted access onto the property at any reasonable time in order to ensure the activities carried out on the property comply with the Development Standards stated herein and all applicable Weld County Regulations. 8. The Special Review area shall be limited to the plans shown herein and governed by the foregoing Standards and all applicable Weld County Regulations. Major changes from the plans or Development Standards as shown or stated shall require the approval of an amendment of the Permit by the Weld County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners before such changes from the plans or Development Standards are permitted. Any other changes shall be filed in the office of the Department of Planning Services. 9. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with all of the foregoing Development Standards. Noncompliance with any of the foregoing Development Standards may be reason for revocation of the Permit by the Board of County Commissioners. 940456 HEARING CERTIFICATION DOCKET NO. 94-40 RE: SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT FOR A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING ON A LOT LESS THAN THE MINIMUM LOT SIZE IN THE A (AGRICULTURAL) ZONE DISTRICT - HUBERT AND ALEXANDRA HAYWORTH A public hearing was conducted on May 18, 1994, at 10:00 a.m. , with the following present: Commissioner W. H. Webster, Chairman Commissioner Dale K. Hall, Pro-Tem Commissioner George E. Baxter Commissioner Constance L. Harbert Commissioner Barbara J. Kirkmeyer - EXCUSED Also present: Acting Clerk to the Board, Shelly Miller Assistant County Attorney, Lee Morrison Planning Department representative, Gloria Dunn The following business was transacted: I hereby certify that pursuant to a notice dated May 2, 1994, and duly published May 5, 1994, in the Windsor Beacon, a public hearing was conducted to consider the request of Hubert and Alexandra Hayworth for a Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit for a single family dwelling on a lot less than the minimum lot size in the A (Agricultural) Zone District. Lee Morrison, Assistant County Attorney, made this a matter of record. Gloria Dunn, Planning Department representative, entered the favorable recommendation of the Planning Commission into the record as written. Hubert Hayworth, applicant, was present and stated he had no additional comments other than he wants to build his home in a very beautiful place. (Changed to Tape #94-24. ) Commissioner Harbert asked what the Health Department's comments were concerning the one-acre minimum requirement for septic systems. Commissioner Hall clarified that the subject property is 40 acres, which is less than the minimum lot size but meets the septic system requirements. No public testimony was offered concerning this matter. Mr. Hayworth confirmed that he had no problem with the Conditions of Approval and Development Standards. Commissioner Harbert moved to approve the request of Hubert and Alexandra Hayworth for a Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit for a single family dwelling on a lot less than the minimum lot size in the A (Agricultural) Zone District, based on the recommendations of the Planning staff and the Planning Commission, with the Conditions of Approval and Development Standards as entered into the record. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Baxter, and it carried unanimously. This Certification was approved on the 23rd day of May, 1994. APPROVED: ATTEST: LeAda4e17BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County Clerk to the Board /i By: -� fit- / ./ '( bet , bster Chairm�ln eputy �1 &rk to the Board Dale . Hall, Pr T m TAPE #94-23 & #94-24 l ! m x�<t /George'''. Baxter DOCKET #94-40 Constance L. Harbert PL0955 EXCUSED Barbara J. Kirkmeyer 940456 Lc! ; IL NOT I C E The Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, on May 18, 1994, conditionally approved a Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit for the property and purpose described below. Conditional approval of this plan creates a vested property right pursuant to Article 68 of Title 24, C.R.S. , as amended, for a period of three years. APPLICANT: Hubert and Alexandra Hayworth P.O. Box 270828 Fort Collins, Colorado 80527 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NzS4NWI, of Section 14, Township 1 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado TYPE AND INTENSITY OF APPROVED USE: A single family dwelling on a lot less than the minimum lot size in the A (Agricultural) Zone District SIZE OF PARCEL: 40 acres, more or less Failure to abide by the terms and conditions of approval will result in a forfeiture of the vested property right. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO BY: DONALD D. WARDEN CLERK TO THE BOARD BY: SHELLY K. MILLER DEPUTY CLERK TO THE BOARD PUBLISHED: May 26, 1994, in the Windsor Beacon 940456 • AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF COLORADO ss - COUNTY OF WELD e D T I c F 1, ROGER A. LIPID of said County of Weld, being duly sworn,say that I am publisher of The Board of County Commissioners of Weld Covey,Colorado,on May WINDSOR BEACON 19. 1994. conditionally approved a Site Specific Development Plan and a weekly newspaper having a general circulation in said Sis1,.oielproperty Rrew purpose p County and published in the town of WINDSOR, in or ��.Me and State. R, described below. said County and State; and that the notice, of which the Conditional approval of this plan creates a vested annexed is a true copy, has been published in said weekly. property right pursuant to for I successive weeks, that the notice was �.68 eed,of for e a'period of published in the regular and entire issue of every number of Awes wears. the paper during the period and time of publication, and in APPLICANT: Hubert end the newspaper proper and not in a supplement and that AIOM'a Hayworth the first publication of said notice was in said paper bearing P.O.Box 270828 Fort Collins, Colorado the date of the wan day of 4 A.D., 19 14 and the LEGAL DESCRIPTION:Pan last publication bearing The date of the of Me N1/2S1/2NWI/4 of day of AD„ 19_and that Station 14, Township 1 the said WINDSOR BEACON has been North Range BT West ate published 6th P.M., Weld County, continuously and uninterruptedly for the period of 5 Caoi°° consecutive weeks, in said County and State, prior to the TYPE AND INTENSITY date of first publication of said notice, and the same is a OFOF APPROVED USE:A newspaper within the meaning regulate printing dwelling on a Pape of an Act to rintin lot less than the minimum la of legal notices and advertisements, approved May 18, eio�ne in the (Agricultural) 1931/,//ann//d)fall prior acts so far as in force. SRE orF PARCEL: 40 I(/V save,more or less (yL/�� Slum toabide byof terms /7 �c and ncl ions of approval U ,Pyaa Sl"IER will result in a forfeiture of i/ the wand property right. Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of BOARD OF COUNTY 19 1174 COMMSSIONERS WELD COUNTY, 4p ////��j-� COLORADO �.>7iN ✓ /Ltns2/h..a BY: DONALD D.WARDEN NOTARY PUBLIC CLERK TO THE BOARD WV: SMELLY K.MILLER My commission expires 9.-0-e72./ 95" CLERK TO THE vw • Published in the Window Bean on Mey XB.IS. 940456 NOT I C E Pursuant to the zoning laws of the State of Colorado and the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, a public hearing will be held in the Chambers of the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, First Floor, Greeley, Colorado, at the time specified. All persons in any manner interested in the Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit are requested to attend and may be heard. Should the applicant or any interested party desire the presence of a court reporter to make a record of the proceedings, in addition to the taped record which will be kept during the hearing, the Clerk to the Board shall be advised in writing of such action at least five days prior to the hearing. The cost of engaging a court reporter shall be borne by the requesting party. BE IT ALSO KNOWN that the text and maps so certified by the Weld County Planning Commission may be examined in the office of the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners, located in the Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Third Floor, Greeley, Colorado. DOCKET NO: 94-40 APPLICANT Hubert and Alexandra Hayworth P.O. Box 270828 Fort Collins, Colorado 80527 DATE: May 18, 1994 TIME: 10:00 a.m. REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit for a single family dwelling on a lot less than the minimum lot size in the A (Agricultural) Zone District LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NiS4NW* of Section 14, Township 1 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Approximately 2.25 miles southwest of Fort Lupton, east of and adjacent to Weld County Road 21 and . 75 mile north of Weld County Road 8 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO BY: DONALD D. WARDEN WELD COUNTY CLERK TO THE BOARD BY: SHELLY K. MILLER DEPUTY CLERK TO THE BOARD DATED: May 2, 1994 PUBLISHED: May 5, 1994, in the Windsor Beacon 940455 Pursuant to the zoning hart of the State of Colorado and the Weld County Zoning Ordinance,a public hearing will be held in the Chambere't of the Board of County Commissioners of Weldl County, Colorado, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 1001 Street,First Floor,' • Greeley,Colorado,at the time specified. All perform AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION in any manner interested in the Site Specific:e Development Plan and STATE OF COLORADO Special Review Permit are u requested to attend and may ICOUNTY OF WELD be heard. I Should the applicant or erM interested party desire the I, ROGER A. LIPICER, of said County of Weld, being duly presence of a court reporter sworn,say that I am publisher of to make a record of the proceedings,in addition to the taped record which will WINDSOR BEACON be kept during the hearing, the Clerk to the Board Mall be advised in writing of ouch a weekly newspaper having a general circulation in said action at least five days prior tome hearing. me cop a County and State, published in the town of WINDSOR, in engaging a court reporter said County and State; and that the notice, of which the shall be borne by the annexed is a true copy, has been published in said weekly. requesting patty. BE IT ALSO KNOWN that for „successive weeks, that the notice was the text and maps sopublished in the regular and entire issue of every number at certified by the Weld Colley the paper during the period and time of pub&motion, and in Planning Commission may the newspaper proper and not in a supplement, and that be examined in the officio al the Clerk to the Board of the first publication of said notice was in said paper bearing County Commissioners. the date of the located in the Weld Cou centennial Center,91510th day of �/'�/,��yy AD., 19 iL nty ' ' and the Street,Third Floor,Greely, last publication bearirfg the date of the Colorado. DOCKET NO:94-40 day of AD., 19_ and that APPLICANT the said WINDSOR BEACON has been published Hubert and Alexandra continuously and uninterruptedly for the period of 5 Hayworth consecutive weeks, in said County and State, prior to the P.O.Box 270828 Fort Collins, Colorado date of first publication of said notice, and the same is a 80527 newspaper within the meaning of an Act to regulate printing DATE:May 18,1994 of legal notices and advertisements, approved May 18, TIME:1d:oo a.m. 1931,and all prior acts so far as in force. REQUEST:A Site ad /V✓ x Development Plan and . Special Review Permit for a single family dwelling on a rP SHER lot less than the minimum lot size in the A(Agricultural) Zone District Subscribed and sworn to before me this --?`p day of LEGAL DESCRIPTION:PW /-P11 19j± of the N1I2S1(2NW1/4 Section 14, Township North,Range 67 West ath a?J1 _ I nd 6th P.M., Weld Coil . NOTARY PUBLIC Colorado y LK 225 milLOCATes southwest o1: n �1. / 79 / 2.25 miles southwest o1.• My commission expires Lev �•z. 4_ Lupton,east of and ad to Weld County Ro 1 and.75 mile north of County Road 8 BOARD OF COUP,1 Y COMMISSIONERS WELD OOU V, COLORADO BY:DONALD D. . WELD COUNTY U.ENK TO THE BOARD v ' BY:SHELLY K.MILLER DEPUTY CLERK TO THE _ BOARD DATED:May 2,190 Published in the Windsor Beacon on May 5,1194. 9 fig Lji al Se, :STATE OF COLORADO OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER 6v7co2\ r Division of Natural Resources : '°'r' —5 r;-{ `2: 38 ey o Department of Natural Resources r. 1313 Sherman Street,Room 818 C-�'�,�t I E * 1,* Denver,Colorado 80203 «�iays`� Phone 1303)866-3581 TO THE SO.",. :D; — _.. FAX(303)866-3589 Roy Romer Governor April 20, 1994 James S.Lochheal Executive Director Ms. Gloria Dunn, Current Planner Hal D.Simpson Weld County Department of Planning Services State Engineer 1400 N. 17TH Ave. Greeley, CO 80631 Re: Hayworth Site Specific Development, USR-1042 NW1/4 Sec. 14, T1N, R67W, 6THPM W. Division 1, W. District 1 Dear Ms. Dunn: We have reviewed the above referenced proposal to allow a single family residence on a 39.725 acre lot which is under the minimum lot sizein the Agricultural zone district. The water supply is to be from an individual on lot well. There is a well permit No. 175416, issued for this property in 1993 for domestic use. We have no objection to the proposal and recommend approval. If you have any questions in this matter, please contact me. Sincerely, DD yL 4700 John Schurer, P.E. Senior Water Resource Engineer JS/hayworth cc: Alan Berryman, Division Engineer Water Supply Branch APR 2 2 1994 — . Weld County Planning E to .(.3-1 t (s) 910455 die : hit; �DCC SUMMAR OF TU..1 WELD C .'T7 F.ANN:NG COMMISSION MEETING April 1f , '.974 Page 3 The Chairperson asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commis: ion for their decision. Shirley Camenisch - yes; Juliette Kroekel - yes; Bud C1et,cns - yes; Marie Koolstra. - yes; Ron Sommer - yes; Tom Rulon - yes; Judy Yamaguchi - yes. Motion carried unanimously. CASE NUMEER: 'JSR-1342 APPLIC..dC: Hubert and Alexandra Hayworth REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a single family residence on a lot under the minimum lot size in the A :Agricultural) zone district. LEGAL CIF :ICN: N2 52 N'n'', of Section 14, TIN, R67W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. LOCATIu : Ac roximately 2 114 miles southwest of Fort Lupton, east of and adjacent to Weld County Road 21 and 3/4 mile north of Weld County Road 8. Hubert Hayworth, applicant explained they want to build a single family residence on property nct currently cultivated to minimize the impact on agricultural use. This a' licacton is similar to ether uses in the area. Planning Commission members discussed uses on surrounding properties and the availani_ity c° utilities to the area. The Chairperson asked if there was anyone. in the audience who wished to speak for or against this application. No one wished to speak. Juliette. Krceael moved Case Number USR-1042, Hubert and Alexandra Hayworth be forwarded to the Board of Count) Commissioners with the Planning Commission's recommendation for approval. Shirley Camenisch seconded the motion. The Chairperson asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Shirley Camenisch - yes; Juliette Kroekel - yes; Bud Clexons - : es; Marie Koolstra - yes ; Ron Sommer - yes; Tom Rulon - yes; Judy Yamaguchi - yes. Motion carried unanimously. CASE NUrBE.t: AM USR 615-2 AFPLIC:.NT: Andesite Rock Campers/ REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and an amended Special Review permit to expand an open pit gravel mine. LEGAL D SCRIPILON: Part of the 52 of Section 3, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Walt County, Colorado. LOCATI;ih-: Aosroximately 2 1/2 miles east of Longmont, east of and adjacent to Weld County Road 7 and approximately 480 feet north of State Highway 119. Gary Tcc.tle, Tuttle Applegate, Inc. , representative for Andesite Rock Company gave a brief overview of the expansion. He stated the applicant had concerns about certain conditions of approval and development standards. Extensive discussion foLLowed regarding amending Development Standard #5, Condition of Approval #3, and adding new Conditions of Approval #4a and 4b. Concerns expressed were vehicle traffic counts, setbacks requirements, and planting plans. 940r e 8 ILL C.2C7 1.LD CC( " •TY BEFORE THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, PLANNING COMMI sl�um RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY CdMMTE'SIZPsE[f 3: 08 Moved by Juliette Kroekel that the following resolution be introtyc Yggpassage by the Weld County Planning Commission. Be it resolved by 64 cia ,taunty Planning Commission that the application for: CASE NUMBER: USR-1042 NAME: Hubert and Alexandra Hayworth ADDRESS: P.O. Box 270828, Fort Collins, CO 80527 REQUEST: A Site Specific Development plan and a Special Review permit for a single family dwelling on a lot less than the minimum lot size in the A (Agricultural) zone district. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: N2 S2 NW4 of Section 14, T1N, R67W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: Approximately 2.25 miles southwest of Fort Lupton, east of and adjacent to Weld County Road 21 and .75 mile north of Weld County Road 8. be recommended favorably to the Board of County Commissioners for the following reasons: 1. The submitted materials are in compliance with the application requirements of Section 24.7 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 2. It is the opinion of the Planning Commission that the applicant has shown compliance with Section 24.3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: The proposal is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan's Residential and Urban Growth Boundary goals and policies. The proposal is located within the urban growth boundary area of the City of Fort Lupton and presented no conflict with its interest. - The proposal is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan's Agricultural goals and policies. The applicant has demonstrated a diligent effort has been made to conserve productive agricultural land in the locational decision for the proposed use. - The proposal is consistent with the intent of the A (Agricultural) zone district and is provided for as a Use by Special Review. 940456 RESOLUTION, USR-1042 Hubert and Alexandra Hayworth Page 2 - The uses permitted will be compatible with the existing surrounding land uses which include rural residences, agricultural production, oil and gas production, and with future development of the surrounding area as permitted by the A (Agricultural) zone district. - No overlay districts affect the site. - Special Review Permit Development Standards will provide adequate protection of the health, safety, and welfare of the neighborhood and County. This recommendation is based, in part, upon a review of the application materials submitted by the applicant, other relevant information regarding the request, and responses from referral entities. The Planning Commission recommendation for approval is conditional upon the following: 1. The attached Development Standards for the Special Review permit shall be adopted and placed on the Special Review plat prior to recording the plat. The plat shall be delivered to the Department of Planning Services and be ready for recording in the Weld County Clerk and Recorder's office within 15 days of approval by the Board of County Commissioners. 2. The Special Review activity shall not occur nor shall any building or electrical permits be issued on the property until the Special Review plat is ready to be recorded in the office of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. Motion seconded by Shirley Camenisch. VOTE: For Passage Against Passage Shirley Camenisch Juliette Kroekel Bud Clemons Marie Koolstra Ron Sommer Tom Rulon Judy Yamaguchi 94®4�u RESOLUTION, USR-1042 Hubert and Alexandra Hayworth Page 2 The Chairperson declared the resolution passed and ordered that a certified copy be forwarded with the file of this case to the Board of County Commissioners for further proceedings. CERTIFICATION OF COPY I, Sharyn Ruff, Recording Secretary for the Weld County Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing resolution, is a true copy of the resolution of the Planning Commission of Weld County, Colorado, adopted on April 19, 1994. ted the 19th of April, 1994. Sharyn F. uff Secretary 9404 8 SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Hubert and Alexandra Hayworth USR-1042 1. The Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review permit is for a single family dwelling on a lot less than the minimum lot size in the A (Agricultural) zone district as submitted in the application materials on file in the Department of Planning Services and subject to the Development Standards stated hereon. 2. Approval of this plan may create a vested property right pursuant to Section 90 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 3. The applicant shall consult with the Brighton Soil Conservation District regarding tree and shrub plantings suitable for this site. 4. All construction on the property shall be in accordance with the requirements of the Weld County Building Code Ordinance. 5. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Design Standards of Section 24.5 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 6. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Operation Standards of Section 24.6 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 7. Personnel from the Weld County Health Department and Weld County Department of Planning Services shall be granted access onto the property at any reasonable time in order to ensure the activities carried out on the property comply with the Development Standards stated hereon and all applicable Weld County Regulations. 8. The Special Review area shall be limited to the plans shown hereon and governed by the foregoing Standards and all applicable Weld County Regulations. Major changes from the plans or Development Standards as shown or stated shall require the approval of an amendment of the Permit by the Weld County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners before such changes from the plans or Development Standards are permitted. Any other changes shall be filed in the office of the Department of Planning Services. 9. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with all of the foregoing Development Standards. Noncompliance with any of the foregoing Development Standards may be reason for revocation of the Permit by the Board of County Commissioners. 94i 01156 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Notice of Hearing, Docket #94-40, was placed in the United States mail, first class mail, postage prepaid,/'� addressed to the/ following C property owners. DATED this c2"/ day of , 1994. HUBERT AND ALEXANDRA HAYWORTH P.O. BOX 270828 FORT COLLINS, CO 80527 BADDING ESTATES 3871 WELD COUNTY ROAD 21 FORT LUPTON, CO 80621 JIMMIE M. AND PAULINE T. CAVANAUGH BETTY ANN CAVANAUGH WILLIAMS 1441 EAST 105 PLACE NORTHGLENN, CO 80621 EUGENE A. AND ERNA N. DOVERSBERGER 3695 WELD COUNTY ROAD 23 FORT LUPTON, CO 80621 MARGARET F. BUCK 3615 WELD COUNTY ROAD 13 ERIE, CO 80516 WENDY PALYO 3872 WELD COUNTY ROAD 21 FORT LUPTON, CO 80621 DUANE E. GORDON AND SUSAN A. GORDON 310 7TH STREET FORT LUPTON, CO 80621 AMOCO OIL COMPANY P.O. BOX 187 FORT LUPTON, CO 80621 Deputy Cler o the Board 940456 INVENTORY OF ITEMS SUBMITTED FOR CONSIDERATION Applicant: Hubert and Alexandra Hayworth Case Number: USR-1042 Submitted or Prepared Prior to Hearing At Hearing 1. Application 47 pages X 2. Application plat 1 pages X 3. DPS referral summary sheet and letter X 4. DPS letter to applicant X 5. DPS Recommendation X 6. DPS Surrounding Property Owner/Mineral Owner Mailing list, letter and certificate. X 7. 3 DPS Maps Prepared by Planning Technician X 8. DPS Notice of Hearing X 9. DPS Case File Summary Sheet X 10. DPS Field Check X 11. April 1, 1994 referral from Brighton Soil Conservation District X 12. March 28, 1994 referral from Weld County Health Department X 13. March 28, 1994 referral from Fort Lupton Fire Protection District X 14. March 24, 1994 referral from Weld County Engineering Department X I hereby certify that the -14 items identified herein were submitted to the Department of Planning Services at or prior to the scheduled Planning Commission hearing. I further certify that these items were forwarded to the Clerk to the Board's office on April 22, 1994. Gloria DWhn, Current Planner STATE OF COLORADO ) COUNTY OF WELD SUBSC#IBE0 AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS day of Q 19(4. t. _ ffroc : c NOTARY P LIC My (CoRuaasion Expires 940"F Exit bi+ A EXHIBIT INVENTORY CONTROL SHEET Case (A6C se/0 /Z)— )-iGlr2U /t, (1/LbliLt‘ Q& & nt(A& Exhibit Submitted By Exhibit Description • 1fhtsA. ��Qam�rna U �inr�n�!��a �1 �fMa G�1Ahha�tt�G ` b5 B. &tl Cifir/DalatIJ J &di r ni ) Al ter.~104114/1:00 014,1:00 iyal c. D. lierkid 49742/a,- &ai-t. Wet, atilt 5/5 E. 3t/E4J71 ainthabtx. PAA-m -Na. /754/(0 (`{/ao%i) F. C. H. I. J. K. L. M. N. 0. P. Q. • R. S. T. U. V. W. X. Y. Z. 9'10456 DATE: April 19, 1994 CASE NUMBER: USR-1042 NAME: Hubert and Alexandra Hayworth ADDRESS: P.O. Box 270828, Fort Collins, CO 80527 REQUEST: A Site Specific Development plan and a Special Review permit for a single family dwelling on a lot less than the minimum lot size in the A (Agricultural) zone district. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: N2 S2 NW4 of Section 14, T1N, R67W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: Approximately 2.25 miles southwest of Fort Lupton, east of and adjacent to Weld County Road 21 and . 75 mile north of Weld County Road 8. THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES' STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THIS REQUEST BE APPROVED FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: 1. The submitted materials are in compliance with the application requirements of Section 24.7 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 2. It is the opinion of the Department of Planning Services' staff that the applicant has shown compliance with Section 24.3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: - The proposal is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan's Residential and Urban Growth Boundary goals and policies. The proposal is located within the urban growth boundary area of the City of Fort Lupton and presented no conflict with its interest. - The proposal is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan's Agricultural goals and policies. The applicant has demonstrated a diligent effort has been made to conserve productive agricultural land in the locational decision for the proposed use. The proposal is consistent with the intent of the A (Agricultural) zone district and is provided for as a Use by Special Review. - The uses permitted will be compatible with the existing surrounding land uses which include rural residences, agricultural production, oil and gas production, and with future development of the surrounding area as permitted by the A (Agricultural) zone district. - No overlay districts affect the site. 94,0456 RECOMMENDATION, USA-1042 Hubert and Alexandra Hayworth Page 2 Special Review Permit Development Standards will provide adequate protection of the health, safety, and welfare of the neighborhood and County. This recommendation is based, in part, upon a review of the application materials submitted by the applicant, other relevant information regarding the request, and responses from referral entities. The Department of Planning Services' staff recommendation for approval is conditional upon the following: 1. The attached Development Standards for the Special Review permit shall be adopted and placed on the Special Review plat prior to recording the plat. The plat shall be delivered to the Department of Planning Services and be ready for recording in the Weld County Clerk and Recorder's office within 15 days of approval by the Board of County Commissioners. 2. The Special Review activity shall not occur nor shall any building or electrical permits be issued on the property until the Special Review plat is ready to be recorded in the office of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. CC 75;-2, SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Hubert and Alexandra Hayworth USR-1042 1. The Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review permit is for a single family dwelling on a lot less than the minimum lot size in the A (Agricultural) zone district as submitted in the application materials on file in the Department of Planning Services and subject to the Development Standards stated hereon. 2. Approval of this plan may create a vested property right pursuant to Section 90 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 3. The applicant shall consult with the Brighton Soil Conservation District regarding tree and shrub plantings suitable for this site. 4. All construction on the property shall be in accordance with the requirements of the Weld County Building Code Ordinance. 5. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Design Standards of Section 24.5 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 6. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Operation Standards of Section 24.6 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 7. Personnel from the Weld County Health Department and Weld County Department of Planning Services shall be granted access onto the property at any reasonable time in order to ensure the activities carried out on the property comply with the Development Standards stated hereon and all applicable Weld County Regulations. 8. The Special Review area shall be limited to the plans shown hereon and governed by the foregoing Standards and all applicable Weld County Regulations. Major changes from the plans or Development Standards as shown or stated shall require the approval of an amendment of the Permit by the Weld County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners before such changes from the plans or Development Standards are permitted. Any other changes shall be filed in the office of the Department of Planning Services. 9. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with all of the foregoing Development Standards. Noncompliance with any of the foregoing Development Standards may be reason for revocation of the Permit by the Board of County Commissioners. LAND-USE APPLICATION SUMMARY SHEET Date: April 12 , 1994 CASE NUMBER: USR-1042 NAME: Hubert and Alexandra Hayworth ADDRESS: P.O. Box 270828, Fort Collins, CO 80527 REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a single family residence on a lot under the minimum lot size in the A (Agricultural) zone district. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: N2 S2 NW4 of Section 14, TIN, R67W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: Approximately 2 1/4 miles southwest of Fort Lupton, east of and adjacent to Weld County Road 21 and 3/4 mile north of Weld County Road 8. SIZE OF PARCEL: 40 acres, more or less. POSSIBLE ISSUES SUMMARIZED FROM APPLICATION MATERIALS: The criteria for review of this Special Review permit is listed in Section 24.3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. The Department of Planning Services' staff has received responses from the following agencies: 1. Weld County Health Department 2. Weld County Engineering Department 3. Fort Lupton Fire Protection District 4. Brighton Soil Conservation District The Department of Planning Services' staff has not received any inquires or objections from surrounding property owners. 940456 y�- Rig G pp Y F a 1 .-1. g 23 25 26I� F •rC 1 ® SY�� `p� cr q 1 �� i k • • r ' I �J e PY / •s Pa z , p a. 11� 'Q • • �• ,. m • ,. .4 • f • a I ' c 2acLur) 5 z 'K .. K • i •• x° • • •• •�(� L o.T y D b x0 • _, -•�. G , i • • \\ t ;• N fI0. � F ii KN l • e a_n G •' • u rI l n nz p • — R� C h °a'04 �� e I • ° I F • • ▪•Wo t, 9 99, • u . ',o �. 's Q, 9999 • r,4 _u a�� E g ,E G.:1•°° l G° ,.. . , K ° 4? t . a .. az •i� F1 a.�ernn: .n . �..�_._. • �• 40 F ° /iT 6.1e, p lv ; 11 r ° ,o .y F: Sd1Sa G es ° Ile: o •z • J\• I• tll 4k .,..s 3A .[��. . , . �fl �,H ,. ▪ F f.� G��' a�a-a�d1 it ' 5dARa0Ua Fc,v'os ; 14. . F3 ° . F l"'[ F SFATE AEC • G F 'l r • _ r p •' F , I , ▪ to r. I ' L , ... V F - �r�• off. , • • • • �� G .•k40 ©�� • F .. � [MCMAMTt•.s. •• a - � Nib� - ( .� WCA!p� =rnn 3• • �_ •°,. ocaJ .",;11^ o or r; • r for J ice', o G E. 1_^ui � / i( Vii.•' 22 23 Le� 7A CFA F G h�/» --_ � e�� "10 r o _ .. {ir �� 2).; II"' •.S a r .4.-or. •,� •oacow• l �.... IIY c.., r I9 1 r3 ORi W.TON . $ c ' , • , i wo 2 x F r / ▪ • i •/• 0 1 ea • r •Fr II • __ f F I ® �� v li /� r'�r ▪ ' �I k I '�4 oJo : ` �c.• ./0S0 i ly i .ro M :i 4:' 4 _ •� _ S▪ NP •i •l 7 csy ' x-uai- _ - • ,• A. il.- •.J.' •R.No° i• �1.i� i Y 1yyy4a xtl 4 n 1 _ •1 0 z F_�� Gig • P 20 :F. 11 x�o z 22 �� ..�.;.X i�.a `, l' ,! . Goo e• d.✓�1 ... ° F • �y..G. ti. �F._ WAIL. r«erde� ��G"_�_� °' . • �.....� . E:__:� .° 1" K, '. F '4 F• wG • N F 1Nu , )) / LP 5 Lr- .u•• o G 0'1-- i K°h. 2. a• L r F✓ I I. • fir' i f' 4 G G I I • I ,a II i• ,! x FF v 4• a. y ae• ) �. ,• j n r r ,z J i 1 I �� G 41 �; \ L Fu G ", G 9 I • r%):J. - . 9.64.E ,g u . Jag K . ..F. i r�ai• fb 41 °.• -.4 I " R68\fJ ;�/,. ;� F' �' Il 1 tl R 67FW� / u ', .a 940Mir' "w _�I I i 6 Al ,------------, ,, c I 4 ) �" � \ _.__- . �-e�- r \ 509 Er _. '*-.- �•° (, ' -� ��///-"' ) �' 495/ j1 I - -- . • SI% 6 � i I l x' •- -./' lOr9 "f t� J \ 11 S a 12 ' � � qy 0 V ' 029 .960 • .-44 5051 ,rao �N C / SOS / - _ e / / / �� l 6i e 15 , I 1 15 I '� 13 K , _ . _ � � � ` � a9 / ! �- 900 5000-�/ � x960- �',53 .. J.., . I l k O 49 • III Ib ' / 9 006 ( / / /� - �\ • 4 \< 45 -I n MO APS '05' - _ -Y-1"1-5.oe 4845 I S xy 4 1.: . 63 j �• - _r 2 J .7122 22 � ' \3 !rr. 494947 4 vx T 399p 1 7-7--\\----4/. ° /. n• 499/ —"•9B] <99 °499 49 / 95 la . (L I - � assa �nttenberg Sch" .. 5000--r a \\ © ..' e �. 5000 Al g t enter ° • � h.y\ �eaee Pleas. t Va eel' C 5000 / • , 1 . - . • f K ,..,28 2 \.::O e, \ , ,�. , ° o>6 • • • • 1( • 044 • O4T • f ?�:. 045 '~ .: 03 u r,a . .3 _fit•:: ':. ice, ••. .' :.. • ��an 3 ,Ir5 iY--t--•.:.•-•"::',:4;.1.11:xit.`:''.3"-` Ulil 4g "II I Oilir 2 .,,,,..:.,,cp,t. ;'fY.t� t •tt y .iii''i�i,•,.,:s: .lit _.-a¢r,i",;:ytt.i'`_,.�-i"JF1 ,- , � ,(- , _ �: ....:::;;:44:4.:" i:.`r;ys,:' "r+"unA; :;'r i.v r ritii � ! :•r R'nZ"r. i4ten;t • .rs,mRi', r'S:ir .."f.• s ::i. 049 ` `µ.::3 ��77" • • • : 05/ • ti. � 0$0 • U.•.1 rtes ;, _. C:Mn Ct , • - • • tj;:, wy.• . • t f rt 3 . � rte c •:a. ...' • • • • rrui: . 3 i r,r.E .: fri._s.. ;; .s..rr'„li r.t is�GF;: r { FIELD CHECK FILING NUMBER: USR-1042 DATE OF INSPECTION: April 1, 1994 APPLICANT' S NAME: Hubert and Alexandra Hayworth REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a single family dwelling on a lot under the minimum lot size in the A (Agricultural) zone district. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The N2 S2 NW4 of Section 14, T1N, R67W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: Approximately 2-1/4 miles southwest of Ft. Lupton, east of and adjacent to Weld County Road 21 and 3/4 mile north of Weld County Road 8 . LAND USE: N Agricultural production, oil well. E Agricultural production, oil well, residence. S Agricultural production, residence. W Weld County Road 21, agricultural ground, 2 oil wells , residence. ZONING: N A (Agricultural) E A (Agricultural) S A (Agricultural) W A (Agricultural) COMMENTS: Access to the site is from Weld County Road 21, a graveled County local road. Existing structures on the property are two oil wells, as shown on the plat. Current land use is a mix of wheat on the west and grass on the east. Five rural residences exist within 1/4 mile of the parcel. Gloria Du n, Current Planner 940456 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES ' PHONE (303)353-3845, EXT. 3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES e 1400 N. 17TH AVENUE GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 COLORADO NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Weld County Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, April 19, 1994, at 1:30 p.m. for the purpose of considering a Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for the property described below. Approval of the request may create a vested property right pursuant to Colorado Law. APPLICANT: Hubert and Alexandra Hayworth LEGAL DESCRIPTION: N2 S2 NW4 of Section 14, T1N, R67W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. TYPE AND INTENSITY OF PROPOSED USE: A single family residence on a lot under the minimum lot size in the A (Agricultural) zone district. LOCATION: Approximately 2 1/4 miles southwest of Fort Lupton, east of and adjacent to Weld County Road 21 and 3/4 mile north of Weld County Road 8. SIZE: 40 acres, more or less The public hearing will be held in the Weld County Commissioners' Hearing Room, First Floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado. Comments or objections related to the above request should be submitted in writing to the Weld County Department of Planning Services, 1400 N. 17th Avenue, Greeley, Colorado 80631, before the above date or presented at the public hearing on April 19, 1994. Copies of the application are available for public inspection in the Department of Planning Services, 1400 N. 17th Avenue, Greeley, Colorado 80631 - Phone - 353-3845, Extension 3540. Judy Yamaguchi, Chairperson Weld County Planning Commission To be published in the Windsor Beacon To be published (1) time by March 24, 1994 Received by: / Lf ' Date: -jZZ714 UUU \/ .�I DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303)353-3845, EXT. 3540 WimplWELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES C. 1400 N.17TH AVENUE GREELEY, COLORADO March 17, 1994 CASE NUMBER: USR-1042 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from Hubert and Alexandra Hayworth for a Site Specific Development permit and Use by Special Review permit for a single family residence on a lot under the minimum lot size in the A (Agricultural) zone district. The parcel of land is described as N2 S2 NW4 of Section 14, T1N, R67W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is approximately 2 1/4 miles southwest of Fort Lupton, east of and adjacent to Weld County Road 21 and 3/4 mile north of Weld County Road 8. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by April 4, 1994, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Gloria Dunn, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: 3. We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Signed: Agency: Date: 0 r ta'C9*', *; REFERRAL LIST NAME: Hubert and Alexandra Hayworth CASE NUMBER: USR-1042 REFERRALS SENT: March 17 , 1994 REFERRALS TO BE RECEIVED BY: April 4, 1994 COUNTY TOWNS and CITIES Attorney _Ault —R--Health Department ____Brighton Extension Service Broomfield _Emergency Management Office _Dacono Sheriff' s Office Eaton —R--Engineering _Erie _Housing Authority Evans _Airport Authority Firestone _Building Inspection X Fort Lupton Frederick STATE Garden City X Division of Water Resources Gilcrest _Geological Survey Greeley Department of Health Grover _Department of Transportation Hudson _Historical Society _Johnstown Water Conservation Board Keenesburg _ Oil and Gas Conservation Commission Kersey La Salle FIRE DISTRICTS Lochbuie Ault F-1 _Longmont _ Berthoud F-2 Mead _ Briggsdale F-24 Milliken _Brighton F-3 New Raymer Eaton F-4 _Northglenn X Fort Lupton F-5 _Nunn Galeton F-6 _Pierce Hudson F-7 ____Platteville Johnstown F-8 Severance La Salle F-9 _Thornton _Mountain View F-10 _Windsor Milliken F-11 Nunn F-12 COUNTIES _ Pawnee F-22 Adams Platteville F-13 Boulder _ Platte Valley F-14 Larimer _ Poudre Valley F-15 Raymer F-2 FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES Southeast Weld F-16 _ _ US Army Corps of Engineers _Windsor/Severance F-17 USDA-APHIS Veterinary Service Wiggins F-18 ____Federal Aviation Administration Western Hills F-20 Federal Communication Commission OTHER SOIL CONSERVATION DISTRICTS Central Colo. Water Conservancy Dist. X Brighton Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. Fort Collins _ Tri-Area Planning Commission Greeley _Longmont West Adams COMMISSION/BOARD MEMBER X Juliette Kroekel 9116456 PLATTE VALLEY 60 S. 27TH AVE. SOIL CONSERVATION BRIGHTON, CO. 80601 DISTRICT (303) -659-7004 April 1, 1995 Gloria Dunn Current Planner Weld County Department of Planning Services Weld County Administrative Offices 1400 N. 17th Ave . Greeley, Co . 80631 RE : Case Number USR-1024 Dear Ms . Dunn: We are in agreement with the proposed homesite, and feel that the soils in this area posses only slight limitations in constructing the septic system. Tree and Shrub Species ********************** Possible tree species for this site are Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern redcedar, ponderosa pine, Siberian elm, Russian-olive, and hackberry. Possible shrub species are skunkbrush sumac, lilac, Siberian peashrub, and American plum. For a full recommendation on planning and planting a windbreak, please consult the Brighton Soil Conservation Service . If you have further questions, please contact us at the above phone number. Thank-you. Sinc ely,• CZ /1/1 ' 17e€ kEC!% Plat e Valley Soi Conservation istrict tAPR 0 7 1994 -a r+ginnino 9t0456 cc( • tYi, Alai ,, - EPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE(303)353-3845, EXT. 3540 z x` ��r i WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES op 21,1994; U 1400 N. 17TH AVENUE GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 COLORADO WELD CO. HEALTH DEPT. March 17, 1994 CASE NUMBER: USR-1042 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from Hubert and Alexandra Hayworth for a Site Specific Development permit and Use by Special Review permit for a single family residence on a lot under the minimum lot size in the A (Agricultural) zone district. The parcel of land is described as N2 S2 NW4 of Section 14, T1N, R67W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is approximately 2 1/4 miles southwest of Fort Lupton, east of and adjacent to Weld County Road 21 and 3/4 mile north of Weld County Road 8 . This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by April 4, 1994, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Gloria Dunn, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons . 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons : 3. ,/ We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Please refer to the enclosed letter. / n � ��'ry'7J �}/�� C 5 , [' Signed'._. , ICi 2 •�\ g---gg yIJC RR Date: tS7 y MAR 3 1 1994 in-mesa, '^r pianning 94,0 4 a s (cif ‘i-.;\\E::"\\ 441114 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303) 353-3845, EXT. 3540• WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 1400 N. 17TH AVENUE ® GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 COLORADO March 17, 1994 CASE NUMBER: USR-1042 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from Hubert and Alexandra Hayworth for a Site Specific Development permit and Use by Special Review permit for a single family residence on a lot under the minimum lot size in the A (Agricultural) zone district. The parcel of land is described as N2 S2 NW4 of Section 14, TIN, R67W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is approximately 2 1/4 miles southwest of Fort Lupton, east of and adjacent to Weld County Road 21 and 3/4 mile north of Weld County Road 8. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by April 4, 1994, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Gloria Dunn, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2 . We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: 3. I/ We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests . 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5 . Please refer to the enclosed letter. /�PJGJ Signed/ Agency: �f �_u/I �r-i 1 Date: —mac / kMAR 2 y 1994 ''rlli ti4A----" JjAo94ll MR 3 14 11 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES %AM P.0 y PHONE (303)353-3845, EXT. 3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES l ® �ym. 11.� 1400 N. 17TH AVENUE CCEIVE® MARL - GREELEY, COLORADO80631 •`:. 1994 COLORADO March 17 , 1994 CASE NUMBER: USR-1042 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from Hubert and Alexandra Hayworth for a Site Specific Development permit and Use by Special Review permit for a single family residence on a lot under the minimum lot size in the A (Agricultural) zone district. The parcel of land is described as N2 S2 NW4 of Section 14, T1N, R67W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is approximately 2 1/4 miles southwest of Fort Lupton, east of and adjacent to Weld County Road 21 and 3/4 mile north of Weld County Road 8. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by April 4, 1994, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Gloria Dunn, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2 . We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons : 3. We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4c,.Esc PFPit,ir 4PPRovEA r'E8 22. 1194 ✓ 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Signed: ( Agency: 46GC o/��'�'T-�^ Date: 03-44 `/�% IIfit LE' FAMILY REV DEUCE CIA/0642. 80 4G, 34.O,-07: 1. tt ‘70 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES ' PHONE(303)353-3845, EXT. 3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 140O GREELEY, N. O17RAAVENUEO631 COLORADO 80631 COLORADO DATE: March 17, 1994 TO: SURROUNDING PROPERTY/MINERAL OWNERS CASE NUMBER: USR-1042 There will be a Public Hearing before the Weld County Planning Commission on Tuesday, April 19, 1994, at 1: 30 p.m. , in the County Commissioners' Hearing Room, First Floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado concerning the request of: NAME: Hubert and Alexandra Hayworth FOR: Site Specific Development permit and Use by Special Review permit for a single family residence on a lot under the minimum lot size in the A (Agricultural) zone district. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: N2 S2 NW4 of Section 14, T1N, R67W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: Approximately 2 1/4 miles southwest of Fort Lupton, east of and adjacent to Weld County Road 21 and 3/4 mile north of Weld County Road 8. Your property is within five-hundred (500) feet of the property on which this request has been made or you may have an interest in the minerals located under the property under consideration. For additional information write or telephone Gloria Dunn, Current Planner. Comments or objections related to the above request should be submitted in writing to the Weld County Department of Planning Services, 1400 N. 17th Avenue, Greeley, Colorado 80631, on or before the date of public hearing. b/ .i L3...Y.&l.,J CERTIFICATE OF MAILING I hereby certify that I have placed a true and correct copy of the surrounding property owners and owners and lessees of minerals in accordance with the notification requirements of Weld County in Case Number usr-1042 for Hubert and Alexandra Hayworth in the United States Mail, postage prepaid First Class Mail by letter as addressed on the attached list. this 21st day of March, 1994. 1 L% 940-756 SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS AND/OR SUBSURFACE ESTATE/MINERAL OWNERS Hubert and Alexandra Hayworth USR-1042 Badding Estates 3871 Weld County Road 21 Fort Lupton, CO 80621 Jimmie M. and Pauline T. Cavanaugh 1441 E. 105 Place Northglenn, CO 80233 Eugnene A. and Erna N. Doversberger 3695 Weld County Road 23 Fort Lupton, CO 80621 Margaret F. Buck 3615 Weld County Road 13 Erie, CO 80516 Wendy Palyo 3872 Weld County Road 21 Fort Lupton, CO 80621 Jimmie M. Cavanaugh and Betty Ann Cavanaugh Williams 1441 E. 105 Place Northglenn, CO 80233 Duane E. Gordon and Susan A. Gordon 310 7th Street Fort Lupton, CO 80621 Amoco Oil Company P.O. Box 187 Fort Lupton, CO 80621 AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS SURFACE ESTATE Application No. •, / Subject Property N �V2 OF S /z bF 11-11_ s 1`l W l , SicrkrA 14 Tou A t,t I ►JoeiL RmGL (? W cif -Al_ (ora p.M , STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. COUNTY OF WELD ) THE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn, states that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names, addresses, and the corresponding Parcel Identification Number assigned by the Weld County Assessor of the owners' of property (the surface estate) within five hundred feet of the property under consideration This list was compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor, or an ownership update from a title or abstract company or attorney, derived from such records, or from the records of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. The list compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor shall have been assembled within thirty days of the application' s submission date. The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me this 7 day 232,2f): 4/7 , 19 '7K/ by Hc,_he4-rt 6s ear t-L- wo,-f JD r WITNESS my hand and official seal. MY Commissioq a cpi esi /// 7 '710 st / 7 ` ,t4 of ry Public My Commission Expires: 910 r r r• 'I.$t2 AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS MINERALS AND/OR SUBSURFACE ESTATE Application No.Subject Property N `1Z OT[1 +LE SIA DC -4. NW 1/4 Otn SW110A l ouOAskt p 1 Noeft , Rolf G W1sr A' -Lt Co"Co P. M STATE OF COLORADO ss COUNTY OF WELD THE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn, states that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names and addresses of all mineral owners and lessees of mineral owners on or under the parcel of land under as their names appear upon the records in the Weld County Clerk and Recorder' s Office or from an ownership update from a title or abstract company or an attorney. 14..,_aottra Osc r A.,y ,-N, The foregoing instrument was subscribed and swo n to before me this 7 day of 732(2„/CAA , 191 WITNESS my hand and official seal. My Commiiss��y4�jpires: ai // ((pp , /a o ary Public ,/ (it to);:\,\%,\ DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES ipe, PHONE (303) 353-3845, EXT. 3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES GREELEY, ON. ORAO AVENUE 140 COLORADO 80631 COLOR Hubert and Alexandra Hayworth P.O. Box 270828 Fort Collins , CO 80527 Subject: USR-1042 - Request for a Site Specific Development permit and Use by Special Review permit for a single family residence on a lot under the minimum lot size in the A (Agricultural) zone district. on a parcel of land described as N2 S2 NW4 of Section 14, T1N, R67W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. Dear Mr. and Mrs. Hayworth: Your application and related materials for the request described above are complete and in order at the present time. I have scheduled a meeting with the Weld County Planning Commission for April 19 , 1994, at 1:30 p.m. This meeting will take place in the County Commissioners' Hearing Room, first floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado. It is recommended that you and/or a representative be in attendance to answer any questions the Planning Commission members might have with respect to your application. It is the policy of Weld County to refer an application of this nature to any town or municipality lying within three miles of the property in question or if the property under consideration is located within the comprehensive planning area of a town or municipality. Therefore, our office has forwarded a copy of the submitted materials to the Fort Lupton Planning Commission for its review and comments. Please call Dave Yamada at 356-9225 for further details regarding the date, time, and place of this meeting. It is recommended that you and/or a representative be in attendance at the Fort Lupton Planning Commission Meeting to answer any questions the Commission members may have with respect to your application. It is the responsibility of an applicant to see that a sign is posted on the property under consideration at least 10 days preceding the hearing date. Sometime prior to April 1, 1994, you or a representative should call me to obtain a sign to be posted on the site no later than April 8, 1994. The sign shall be posted adjacent to and visible from a publicly maintained road right-of-way. In the event the property under consideration is not adjacent to a publicly maintained road right-of-way, the applicant shall post one sign in the most prominent place on the property and post a second sign at the point at which the driveway (access drive) intersects a publicly maintained road right-of-way. Your sign posting certificate must be returned to the Department of Planning Services' office on or before the date of the hearing. 940450 Hubert and Ale>. _ .. Hayworth USR-1042 Page 2 The Department of Planning Services' staff will make a recommendation concerning this application to the Weld County Planning Commission. This recommendation will be available twenty-four (24) hours before the scheduled hearing. It is the responsibility of the applicant to call the Department of Planning Services' office before the Planning Commission hearing to make arrangements to obtain the recommendation. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to call me. Respectfully, Cbeia Dunn Current Planner W4.iY-I�tJ USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW APPLICATION Department of Planning Services, 1400 N. 17th Avenue, Greeley, Colorado 80631 Phone - 353-3845 - Ext. 3540 Case Number s loco, _ Date Received 3- -qq Application CheckecS B GD Mylar Plat Submitted , Application Fee Receipt Number r 9 9.Y' Recording Fee Receipt Number 1.0211E COMPLETED 1i APPLICANT: (please print or type, except for necessary signature) I (we) , the undersigned, hereby request a hearing before the Weld County Planning Commission and Weld County Board of County Commissioners concerning the proposed Use by Special Review Permit on the following described unincorporated area of Weld County, Colorado: LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT AREA: 14k. 5/2 a04 Section I4- T 'j. N, R 6,7 W LEGAL DESCRIPTION of contiguous property owned which Special Review Permit is proposed: Section T N, R W Property Address (if available) PRESENT ZONE A6RICIAITLI2k-- OVERLAY ZONES TOTAL ACREAGE 40 PROPOSED LAND USE ?QIUkTL Rt51L,sact I #621L.I,1LT uQAI- EXISTING LAND USE PCQ.ICULIUML- SURFACE ELL (PROPERTY OWNERS) OF AREA PROPOSED FOR IRE usE DI SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT: Name: 4U6£21 Alb AILIAWDLA 4Al l- t1 Address: PO FOX e1-9OS28 City: FT Cai/A6 Co Zip: 1(0527- Home Telephone: (733 - 3753 Business Telephone: 225 - /400 Name: Address: City: Zip: Home Telephone: Business Telephone: APPLICANT OR AUTHORIZED AGENT (if different than above) : Name: Address: City: Zip: 1i Home Telephone: Business Telephone: '4r annino List the owner(s) and/or lessees of mineral rights on or under the subject properties of record. ^ //�� Name: JIMMIt A . (AvlarcaAUGH f 'LTT9 AAA U4v4s Aub&H OILLR ll Address: /44d t IDS PL. City: ANtalaib(N Co Zip: foz33 Name: DMAn)i (soR1DO + s(S4 4. 6-0200, Address: 310 TH ST City: F LUPIoa Co Zip: $0621 I hereby depose and state under the penalties of perjury that all statements, proposals and/or plans submitted with or contained within the application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. COUNTY OF Weld ) STATE OF COLORADO ) Signatu Owner or Authorized Agent Subscribed and sworn to before me this 7 day of 19 ry �A) 7/c/6 0 ARY PUBLIC My commission expires 94 4453 Detailed descriptions of the proposed use for which we are submitting this aplication, as requested under Section 2 of Application Requirements, are listed below. Explain proposed use. The use we propose for the land is to add one single family home (of about 2000 square feet) to the parcel , to be occupied by the applicants, while causing minimal impact on the current use of the land. The NW 1/4 of section 14 , T1N, R67W was formerly owned by Gladys S . Cavanaugh. Upon her death this land was divided into 4 40 acre parcels and divided among her heirs. One of those parcels (the S 1/2 of the N 1/2) is occupied by heirs of G. S. Cavanaugh. It consists of a single family home and some outbuildings, the rest of the land being devoted to dryland farming and dry pasture. The N 1/2 of the N 1/2 contains another single family home, for which a use by special review was granted by the county. The remainder of its land is used similarly. The S 1/2 of the S 1/2 has been granted a use by special review for a single family home, but construction has not yet begun. Our parcel is the last to request a use by special review. The proposed use is in keeping with that previously found to be acceptable by the county, and is exactly the same as our neighbors use for their property. The subject property is currently half planted in winter wheat, half fallow. There is an area in the NE corner (please refer to the map) that has not been under recent cultivation; this is our proposed building site. This will allow us to build with a minimum of disturbace to the existing agricultural use. No land would have to be removed from farming in order to build a house. The wheat is being grown by a neighbor who has leased the land from the previous owners; we are honoring that lease and plan to continue to do so. As all of the surrounding properties are used for dryland farming, dry pasture, oil and gas production with widely dispersed single family homes, our proposed use is in keeping with established and existing uses in the area. Explain need for use. We have purchased this land with the hope of being able to build a home on it. We understood at the time of purchase that a use by special review would have to be applied for and granted in order to do this, and that a unfavorable decision could be a possiblity. If this were to occur, it would cause some financial hardship as we have already made a large investment in the land just by its purchase price. 9404x Explain the types of existing uses on surrounding properties. The surrounding properties are all used for single family homes, dryland farming, pasture, and oil and gas production. Sizes of these properties range from 40 acres up. The distance of the proposed use to residential structures in each direction. From our proposed residence to other residences: North - greater than 1/2 mile. South - Approximately 1/4 mile. East - Slightly greater than 1/2 mile. West - Slightly less than 1/2 mile. The maximum number of users, patrons, members, and buyers. The only users will be the applicants, who will occupy the proposed single family home. The number of employees, number of shifts, and hours of operation. Should not apply. No business use is intended The type of water source for the proposed use. A permit for a domestic well has been granted by the state (permit no. 175416 issued 12/22/93 , attached) and will have to be dug after approval of this application. Explain the access route to be utilized for the proposed use. A single lane gravel driveway would be constructed along the northern edge of the property (Please see map) . This will cause only minimal disturbance to the existing agricultural use. An access permit for this has been granted by the county. Explain the type, size, weight, and frequency of vehicular traffic associated with the proposed use. This will be no more than what is normally associated with a single family home. We will not be operating a business from the property, will not have employees, etc. The type of sewage facilities for the proposed use. A permit for an individual sewage disposal system (septic tank and leach field) has been granted by the county (permit no. G-930433 , attached) and will have to be constructed after approval of this application. 94C4:56 A description of the proposed fire protection measures associated with the proposed use. This will be what is normally associated with a single family home occupied by two people. The property is located within the Ft. Lupton fire protection area. Building codes will be observed, smoke detectors and fire extinguishers will be placed throughout the residence. In addition, the applicants pledge to try to use common sense in their daily use of the residence. The types and maximum number of animals to be concentrated on the use by special review area at any one time. No commercial stock raising will be carried out. The only animals anticipated on the property are a small number of the usual domestic pets (dogs and cats) and enough chickens to supply us and our friends with fresh eggs. The type and size of any waste, stockpile or storage areas associated with the proposed use. No waste or stockpile would be anticipated. A detached garage of about 20 x 30 feet for storage and a private workshop may be constructed at some future date, but this will not be part of our immediate building plans (see map) . Type of storm water retention facilities associated with the proposed use. None should be required. No large buildings or paved areas creating runoff problems will be built. The time schedule and method of removal and disposal of debris, junk and other wastes associated with the proposed use. We consider it to be a part of responsible citizenship to reuse and recycle domestic household waste whenever possible. That which would go to the landfill would be no more than is normally associated with a residence occupied by two people; weekly service by a commercial trash pick-up company that currently serves the area would be contracted. Explain proposed landscaping plans and erosion control measures associated with the proposed use. Landscaping and erosion control wil consist mainly of trees and shrubs distributed so as to provide a windbreak and to attract wildlife. The native grasses that currently occupy the building site area will be repaired and encouraged to grow in order to repair damage from construction. Should the lease of our land for its current use of growing winter wheat ever be cancelled by the lessee, we would attempt to return the land to native prarie grasses. 94045s Reclamation procedures to be employed upon cessation of the use by special review activity. It is the hope of the applicants that cessation of use will be many years away, and will occur of natural causes after many years of enjoying the use peaceably, quietly, in a beautiful place. Thus no reclamation procedures are currently planned. A time table showing the periods of time required for construction and start-up of the proposed use. In order to proceed with construction as quickly as possible in the event of a favorable recommendation, we have already begun the process of getting bids on the construction of the residence. We would then be able to begin almost as soon as a use by special review was approved. As a typical residential construction loan is for a period of 6 months, this would govern the time table for our construction. 0a,58 The following written materials and supporting documents are requested under Section 3 of the application requirements. A statement explaning how the proposal is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. The Weld County Comprehensive Plan addresses a large number of concerns regarding future development. There are mainly two of these that would pertain to our proposed residence: 1) That development should conserve productive agricultural land in an agricultural district, and 2) that development should not place a financial burden on the county by way of services required. We are fortunate that on our property there is one corner that has not been recently cultivated. We have purposely selected this corner (please see map) as our proposed building site so that our construction can take place with almost no impact to the present agricultural use. A driveway will have to be constructed from the main road to the residence, this is placed on the northern most line of the property so as to minimize its interference with the cultivation of the land. The land has previously been leased for the growing of winter wheat, we are honoring that lease and have met with the lessee to assure him that we will continue to do so in future years. The construction of our house will remove almost no land (the exception being the narrow strip for the driveway) from agricultural production. Our residence will not require the county to provide any utility services, as we will be providing our own water and sewage disposal systems. We have been residents of Weld County for over 4 years, thus we are not adding new burdens to such county services as landfill space, police, and fire protection. We are merely changing their location slightly. It is, of course, our hope that our requirments for police and fire service will be minimal . A statement explaining how the proposal is consistent with the intent of the district in which the use is located. The use is located in an agricultural district, containing widely dispersed residences. The building of a residence while making every effort to cause the minimum of impact to the current agricultural use of the land is consistent with all nearby land use in the district. Our use should not have any effect on the agricultural zoning of our land or that of our neighbors, nor would we wish this. A statement explaining what efforts have been make, in the location decision for the proposed use, to conserve productive agricultural land in the agricultural zone district. Our land has for the past few years been used for the growing of winter wheat. Half now has a crop planted, half is fallow, with the exception of the northeast corner. This corner has seen no recent cultivation, and is currently covered with wild native grass. We have purposely selected this corner (please see map) as our proposed building site so that our construction can take place with almost no impact to the present agricultural use. A driveway will have to be constructed from the main road to the residence, this is placed on the northern most line of the property so as to minimize its interference with the cultivation of the land. The land has previously been leased for the growing of winter wheat, we are honoring that lease and have met with the lessee to assure him that we will continue to do so in future years. The construction of our house will remove almost no land (the exception being the narrow strip for the driveway) from agricultural production. A statement explaining there is adequate provision for the protection of the health, safety and welfare of the inhabitants of the neighborhood and the county. We would not expect our residence to have any negative impact on the health, safety, and welfare of the neighbors. The property is located within the Ft. Lupton fire protection area should their services be required. A statement explaining the uses permitted will be compatible with the existing surrounding land uses (include a description of existing land uses of all properties adjacent to the property) . The requested use is to place a single family home on a section of the property not currently used for agricultural production, while maintaining the present agricultural use for the rest of the property. As all of the surrounding properties are used for dryland farming, dry pasture, oil and gas production with widely dispersed single family homes, our proposed use is in keeping with established and existing uses in the area. A statement explaining the uses permitted will be compatible with the future development of the surrounding area as permitted by the existing zone and with future development as projected by the comprehensive plan of the county or the adopted master plans of affected municipalities. The surrounding area of our property is zoned agricultural , and our proposed use is in keeping with this. The type of future development projected by the Weld County Comprehensive Plan for areas such as ours is mainly that of additional residential construction, which is also compatible with our intended use. 9e0i`it A statement explaining the use by special review area is not located in a flood plain, geologic hazard and Weld County Airport overlay district area. The use by special review area is not located in any of the above mentioned areas. Please find attached a map of the S. Platte flood plain area with the property location marked. Proof that a water supply will be available which is adequate in terms of quantity, quality, and dependability. A permit for a domestic well has been granted by the state (permit no. 175416 issued 12/22/93 , attached) and will have to be dug after approval of this application. A copy of the deed or legal instrument identifying the applicants interest in the property nder consideration. Please find a copy of the warranty deed identifying our ownership of the property, attached. A noise report, unless waived by the Department of Planning Services, documenting the methods to be utilized to meet the applicable noise standards. We should cause no more noise (and can promise that we will cause less than most) than is typically generated by a single family residence. A soil report of the site prepared by the Soil Conservation Service or by a soils engineer. A copy of a soil report prepared by Empire Labs of Longmont, Co. is attached. This report details the existance of moderately expansive soils on the building site and makes recommendations for dealing with this. Engineering work for the basement and foundation of the proposed residence has also been prepared by the same company. Basement/foundation walls will be supported on cassions, with a floating concrete floor. A certified last of the names, addresses and the corresponding parcel identification number of the owners of property withing 500 feet of the property subject to the application. This list was prepared from the records of the Weld County Assessor. Please find it attached. A certified list of the names and addresses of mineral owners and lessees of minerals on or under the parcel of land being considered. This list was prepared from an ownership update prepared by Transamerica Title Company, Greely, Co. Please find it attached. Weld County Road & Bridge Date c5&. ZZI /194 P.O. Box 758 Greeley, CO 80632 356-4000 Ex. 4750 WELD COUNTY ROAD ACCESS APPLICATION nz SevsC 14:L,1\' ta�t_d 1. Applicant Name 14 L.:(2)34. 4 wpe•Ti Phone C..c13—%75i Address p,p,P>0X 1.70Sin..113 City F+,CoLLtn4S State CA Zip ect5t..1 2. Address or location of access L.'C.2 ZI • Subdivision Block Lot — Weld County Road 11 E.,1 Side of road e s:5r N Se or W Distance from & number of intersecting road 3/c./ rdtt.6 kl oar 4 tact 3. Is there an existing access to the property Yes No X Reason for access go MG3 Estimated Daily Traffic Cars / Trucks ?c Tractor Trailer 4. Site Sketch 5 t4€s IS"xtot J. Gt'1 9 02 6Qv'WL Lei 1'�YYY tel CO 5. Weld County Recommendations Culvert y ex' Size )5' Length 2At Other Comments �Q.4 To kc e e PLE 1- L c.c. s9 GwLJeRT P.S /kS PosStet-6 ItL DJT $ ANA, BLG'4O nLC3w DR,tm6k,ya,; TO Thkt; t-Ics GRA9ct -T}}o lesi 6. Weld County Access Installation And Maintenance Policy It shall be the policy of Weld County that whenever the installation of any culvert is made nessary by the creation of a new access from private property to a County Road by the owner or occupier of such property, such owner or occupier shall pay for the new culvert and the cost of installation. The culvert shall be installed according to the specifications for the Department of Engineering. After installation, such owner or. occupier shall be responsible for the maintenance and repair of said culvert. This policy shall apply to all new and existing culverts of the type described above. :fraa :� . .r.... .., .:.; ... • .• . .i.,•.I., ...D :. '.::i::. .,... ...,"Tr_'.Ri-;[:, • ,.. ._'Y E:•: P t::.": .l. : .... .. &--'' '.. . AINE , ... .TA ADDRES PO PO)Ff LUP.MI: CC S021 4.).0L3S CF PROPOSED SYSTEM 1/2 MI H OF WF 8 8. 21 Fl ....L.S::•T'(::i!''# :`<:',..,,..:L ....1..7 ,. r. ••.:... DESCRIPTION...•..,:�. OF ::�.. : l:.. n„ :::2 :-ixtr.: -::::.`(:: 14 7UF :1. RN3 .... • . . .• RESIDENTIAL �1 HOUSE • :.... T'"r{'�'f::.. I':,f:::•:: :l.S';...!'�I'T'.::F�,I... t>,l£3(.,.� !-1(:1(..:,I::: :EPVI "" PERSONS,S ; BATHROOMS . . :'�• (' S ',..... t:�',ti.,&) ACRES VICES.s (::,::.... .. !: ... . .. .11'# .. ,.. .. . ..i) LOT •�.i.: i•',:...: ......X)i:•: '•?:•''#:.. .3 BASEMENT PLUMNINS NO WA7ER ,..UPC••t... . t::JJ!::....... ,,i •R(• O A _ .., .:•,+.1 .. '•:i !:!�.::1 .:.:''#( i....!.!'} t .i.ilf.: ....�...'''#C:. . ........'Y StAiksiAt PERCENT 71:''(J #'•'' • t.i.,.,l... DIRECTION •'t:'t:lt.J:#:i�.lE:•:-t I-'�!(''�!,•sl::.,.:.s'', S)E::_..1.(:';f•�I MCE....... E:I:i''•l 100 'Y'}:::Ai, FLCOD PLAIN .... .. .... .ROM THE APPLICATION ., :•��'�, 1 SUPPLIED) AND ;'}..}#: ON—SITE fait:l:#:I... I I:::I'`(: (:iL..s::-i '::.:!.•! ji;:�;'1 ,::; :C(:ilal :I.��IE' #,# !i'�i'T':1:(:1.�I '::31..#�'!�'I...:I' ..X f'lE:: FOLLOWING MINIMUM INSTALLATION SPECIFICATIONS AR::: ;,- ;s ':!:RE::D N SEPTIC-;C-; TAW:: f IOW_._ GALLONS,. ABSORPTION T!:E:l�Ic ..I .q... S(:1„ :::T.. OR ABSORPTION 1 ION BED 111.. SO. !"..... :t i ADDITION, 0#' ;;ti A#�'#-:#�;}'"l:f.'T' �1C s B ECT TO •t UE ,FOLLOWING AD) I:'r':1OHs�L.‘ �t'ERMS AND ::( DI !'•!TIO 'S:: ...._........[.x... J""'':.._.._..., . S,✓Z any... )1ieeft,....... .................. _...............-..._...............................,........ 'HIS !-'E::#:4M:I:`t' IS t: RAh!'r'}::::(? TEMPORARILY -t't:. ALLOW C.'u:#... T'kL!£::'r':l.oi'•# 'T',.! £:;a.,MlrtE:•I,.:E.. 'r':••l:i: :y PERMIT LAY BE REVOKED (:1I::: SUSPENDED.NDE D BY THE WELD COUNTY'1'Y HEALTH DEPARTMENT I"'T FOP REASONS f.:l..:.1.. 'CNR'TI••I :#:i•+# T!..#E.:: WIEE:l...1.) COUNTY INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM Ri:::iat.l#...{:'T'I£_Nf:; INCLUDING "AII...I!RE_ TO MEET AI'•IY TERM OR £:;t:1NIX):l:'T'':(1;••} IMPOSED THEREON X)l.l!=::3:;,!i:•i ••t!:::}' '::'t:lPttRl` OR FINAL ,I"" 'i.l Vs`�s}._« THE ISSUANCE' 'f :•E:::!:;,ir • t:• NOT ASSUMPTION.!::'w, 'i•1. ]: :}+_,��i# Et;#:: (:11' 'r';..i:#..:+ PERMIT DOES li:,s CONSTITUTE ,••s;:�,::l.Ji'#:'"'T:J:i.::'.I••1 BY THE E:F'ART'IYIi IAT (:1E:. I'TS E::!'!E='L.(:;YEE:S ':: F #._:I:i='.X:::E:!._:I:'T'Y I::£:1I:. T1••EE: r•.`r:1:L..l..'F;#E: OF; INADEQUACY C:!::' THE: SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM. KW aigielq l:P!'.':1:..::11*.,*E::NTr'1}.,. ..3E:°E_:C':ii....':,. T Df':" f.:: HIS PERMIT IS ivi... TRANSFERABLE ANX) SHALL BECOME VOID I:#-' SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION NN t.1r.:rS lt3T COMMENCED WITHIN ONE YEAR OF ITS ISSUANCE. BEFORE R ISSUING F':f.E'•li'`,!... APPROVAL 1'vAL. C1s'':. -HIS PERMIT R#YIIT THE:: WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT 10 IMPOSE ADD:!:".. 'It31+AL_ TERMS AND CONDITIONS REUIRED TO !°',+::!:i:'T (:1L!!:;, Ri:::LtLJLAT:!:Oi•.}: k':.'.+,'•I t'r (:;:a1-1`t':!:H'..I:!:M':1 :::i,... IS.. FINAL AL. PERMIT APPROVAL IS CONTINGENT T UPON THE FINAL. INSPECTION OF 1_H1:: CON- 1' Y 1 •Y A DEPARTMENT. 1"!•:' 1 '!Er.r C::.T) SYSTEM .. THE E,sJ!:;.I...x) COUNTY HEALTH I••i .:,I::•''r::i!": : I:... 94C4 5G G •P•r£•.;•ri,,!,; ....;;` :,I:.' •J' •!' i '" - .. . .. • . . :i . Form No. OFFICE OF - 'E STATE ENGINEER GWS-25 " COLORADO ul\ 'ON OF WATER RESOURCES 818 Centennial Bldg., 1313 Sherman St., Denver, Colorado 80203 (303) 866-3581 LIC WELL PERMIT NUMBER 175416 - -- APPLICANT DIV. 1 CNTY. 62 WD 2 DES. BASIN MD Lot: Block: Filing: Subdiv: APPROVED WELL LOCATION WELD COUNTY VERNITA M ZUBIA SE 1/4 NW 1/4 Section 14 505 W GENESEO APT C Twp 1 N RANGE 67 W 6th P.M. LAFAYETTE CO 80026 DISTANCES FROM SECTION LINES (303) 661-0480 1502 Ft. from North Section Line 2640 Ft. from West Section Line PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A WELL ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT CONDIl1ONS OF APPROVAL 1) This well shall be used in such a way as to cause no material injury to existing water rights. The issuance of the permit does not assure the applicant that no Injury will occur to another vested water right or preclude another owner of a vested water right from seeking relief In a civil court action. 2) The construction of this well shall be in compliance with the Water Well Construction and Pump Installation Rules 2 CCR 402-2, unless approval of a variance has been granted by the State Board of Examiners of Water Well Construction and Pump Installation Contractors in accordance with Rule 17. 3) Approved pursuant to CRS 37-92-602(3)(b)(II)(A) as the only well on a tract of land of 40 acres described as the N1/2 of the S1/2 of the NW1/4 of Section 14, Township 1 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, <<u 4) The use of ground water from this well is limited to ordinary household purposes inside one single family dwelling, fire protection, the watering of poultry, domestic animals, and livestock on farms and ranches, and the irrigation of not over one acre of home gardens and lawns. 5) Production from this well is restricted to the Laramie-Fox Hills aquifer which corresponds to the interval between 535 feet and 820 feet below ground surface. Plain casing shall be installed and sealed to prevent production from other zones. 6) The maximum pumping rate shall not exceed 15 GPM. 7) The return flow from the use of the well must be through an individual waste water disposal system of the non-evaporative type where the water is returned to the same stream system in which the well is located. 8) This well shall be constructed not more than 200 feet from the location specified on this permit. Note: To insure a maximum productive life of this well, perforated casing should be set through the entire producing interval of the approved zone or aquifer indicated above. Note: Permit No. 156317 (expired) was previously issued on January 26, 1990, for this lot --)2 is/ao/t3 OWNER'S COPY APPROVED z DWR State Engineer By Receipt No. 0363113 DATE ISSUED DEC 2 2 1993 RATION DATE D 2 1995 r "I t 1! 1 !I K ,i1 A '}'L� !�f`/ r L-1,,-_,_ r,,,fj., ,� ,G.li, .-- l a . `\ d : c ':, r> ;i� r� ... ` \ �!—:0'r \!/ )1r .2 ). 'fi 5 ..t' f rr w. w • .w qA6 ' 31 �r�4 -- ,7_,,,:.401,4,,,.,,,,..s.-10,1—*' \ s n h i77 .{ �...a '. • l _ I •� 77 SI ' �� /1 I� �i '�I r,' ''''.4.;.,1::',-.: , % a ri ! o t*. .. A stNS.. Y_'s`' P'"r h or 1 ( 4�� i lo, R r lila t _i 4 i t. « (ss . 1 , 1�q ,1,..,-)i.JY ''Ir' AM S ' *_ -�I 9r' " k It y I .�.' ppl� fr y 7wy d I �' tr / _ � �� sir. ,i,Pkii J', , k.,--1:-.s . , ,....5 _I x.1;5 tC, --. \, 1¶iii!! S 4S �1.� �� w� I)c 9 P s! n /V I ,•:P—�z ,� 150, 1 , �! _ 4'' .'' �A ] ft'1 v -, � r ! ' ) ..) , , <' ,• .9 V( y1. ■� r l �SJ 41 k `3 )•r I 7 Ttrt 4 6,i I Vic,I � . �x--1 11-- 1^c�� r r Jig s 1' o 1,.. t I, _ 1 yf)- 4.4 .l'.•. 11 II% Ittt /' 5 e ill 4. l 1 ,' � i� Yr 1 n s � , I I ter. I i , ,' '' , 9"— t Imp crEos -e- - - n NE I I 1 , i) p ! t i. t ilil 7 a' �; P DE'IaN X171 \� 1 11t„ (I { r . '' I n r ' ti . y _ < 1 '' C ti I !. rr y„ y N 1 +. I sue+ ._ f .,3a. 1I c �+ .I \ I � \i Ll Ik' lots ' "A ( �� ,�� 7Y i0, /., �I i� �� r_i ,s �It, ( �q 'sA1 VASp i ,.� V ' (I { Q1 C'.• I' r111 er(I '_ � z ' S,d ' 1 i/�� ,r J Its 3 � ' Is I,, % I ,1r ,c '..0�` I n_ • .rgjTAstra,�i R� ' 1 t �; d 5't v. .u...., ,, iti, R i 'I' r , )+ �,,t!//or �, ,.. di. , , . lizn$, . .:1,..6.,, . trevil.i ' i. , - ,,,v 4,,TT k , ,�{1 '( J r r 2 �/1�I I i di�H(L( • _ • I y III�J ' �,f /iritur44_,.. , km,41/4.1 _ 1 ooh t Lam 'r \ p 94,02.-.56 B 1425 EC 02372493 02/04/94 16 ' $5 . 00 1/001 F 1866 .+A" - ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK & Rr -1RDER WELD CO, CO AR2372493 WARRANTY DEED THIS DEED, Made this 28th day of January, 1994 between Vernita M. Zubia of the County of Weld and State of Colorado, grantor, and Hubert O. Hayworth and Alexandra R. Hayworth STATE DOCUMENTARY FEE whose legal address is Vacant Land, Fort Lupton, Colorado Date p' ' --1 g 5, 7S' of the County of Weld and State of Colorado, grantees: WITNESS that the grantor for and in consideration of the sum of FIFTY SEVEN THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED AND 00/100, ($57,500.00) Dollars, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, sold and conveyed, and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell, convey and confirm unto the grantees, their heirs and assigns forever, not in tenancy in common but in joint tenancy, all real property, together with improvements, if any, situate, lying and being in the County of Weld and State of Colorado, described as follows: The N1/2 of the S1/2 of the NW1/4 of Section 14, Township 1 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P.M. , County of Weld, State of Colorado D also known by street and number as Vacant Land, Fort Lupton, Colorado TOGETHER with all and singular the hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto 1 5 belonging, or in anywise appertaining and the reversion and reversions, remainder and 2� remainders, rents, issues and profits thereof, and all the estate, right, title, interest, claim and demand whatsoever of the grantor, either in law or equity, of, in and to the above bargained premises, with the hereditaments and appurtenances. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises above bargained and described, with the appurtenances, unto the grantees, their heirs and assigns forever. And the grantor, for himself, his heirs and personal representatives, does covenant, grant, bargain, and agree to and with the grantees, their heirs and assigns, that at the time of the ensealing and delivery of these presents, he is well seized of the premises above conveyed, has good, sure, perfect, absolute and indefeasible estate of inheritance, in law, in fee simple, and has good right, full power and lawful authority to grant, bargain, sell and convey the same in manner and form aforesaid, and that the same are free and clear from all former and other grants, bargains, sales, liens, taxes, assessments, encumbrances and restrictions of whatever kind or nature soever, except general taxes for 1994 and subsequent years; except easements, restrictions, covenants, conditions, reservations and rights of way of record, if any; The grantor shall and will WARRANT AND FOREVER DEFEND the above-bargained premises in the quiet and peaceable possession of the grantees, their heirs and assigns, against all and every person or persons lawfully claiming the whole or any part thereof. The singular number shall include the plural, the plural the singular, and the use of any gender shall be applicable to all genders. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the grantor has executed this deed on the date set forth above.VVIIA AL,Vernita M. Zubia STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me County of Weld ) this 28th day of January, 1994 by Vernita M. Zubia O ....•..�C Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires 5:30- 77 KIRK ha GOBLE icz c NJ • .' :zzNOTARY PUBLIC qlcs t OF Cat ' 1113 Tenth Avenue No. 921A. Rev. 3-85 Greeley, COLORADO 80631 9C04r Terracon GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT HUBERT HAYWORTH RESIDENCE WELD COUNTY ROAD 21 WELD COUNTY, COLORADO ELI PROJECT NO. 22935161 Prepared for: HUBERT HAYWORTH 11829 WELD COUNTY ROAD 15 LONGMONT CO 80504 Empire Laboratories, Inc. A Division of The Terracon Companies, c/``;, "'� c r gOR%TO Empire Laboratories, Inc. Is% A Division of The Terracon Companies, Inc. P.O. Box 1135 • 1242 Bramwood Place Longmont, Colorado 80502 = Phone (303) 776-3921 ' f•�M1�•r�`l' Fax No (303) 776-4041 PO. Box 503 • 301 No. Howes Fort Collins,Colorado 80522 (303)484-0359 January 4, 1994 FAX No.(303)484-0454 Mr. Hubert Hayworth -- 11829 Weld County Road 15 Longmont, CO 80504 Re: Geotechnical Engineering Report, Proposed Residence on Weld County Road 21 Weld County, Colorado ELI Project No. 22935161 Empire Laboratories, Inc. (ELI) has completed geotechnical engineering exploration for the proposed single-family residence to be located on the east side of Weld County Road No. 21 . The results of our engineering study, including the boring location diagram, laboratory test results, test boring records, and the geotechnical recommendations needed to aid in the design and construction of foundations and other earth connected phases of this project are attached. The subsurface exploration indicated soil conditions which are typical of soils commonly found in the Dacono area. The subsurface soils at the site consisted predominately of stiff to very stiff — calcareous clays overlying sedimentary bedrock. The information obtained by geologic survey and, the results of field exploration and laboratory testing completed for this study, indicate that the soils and bedrock at the site have low to moderate expansion potential. Based on the geotechnical engineering analyses,subsurface exploration and laboratory test results, we recommend that the proposed residence be supported on a grade beam and straight shaft pier foundation system. Slab-on-grade may be utilized for the interior floor system provided that care is taken in the placement and compaction of the subgrade soils and that potential differential slab movements can be accounted for in the design or can be tolerated. Given the engineering characteristics of near surface clay soils and portions of the bedrock strata, consideration should be given to the use of structural floor systems if no differential movement can be tolerated. Other design and construction details, based upon geotechnical conditions, are presented in the report. Offices of The Terracon Companies, Inc. Geotechnical, Environmental and Materials Engineers Arizona: Tucson • Colorado: Colorado Springs, Denver, Ft.Collins,Greeley, Longmont • Idaho'. Boise Illinois: Bloomington,Chicago, Rock Island ■ Iowa: Cedar Falls,Cedar Rapids, Davenport, Des Moines,Storm Lake Kansas: Lenexa,Topeka, Wichita ■ Minnesota: St. Paul ■ Missouri. Kansas City ■ Nebraska: Lincoln, Omaha Oklahoma: Oklahoma City,Tulsa • Texas: Dallas ■ Utah: Salt Lake City • Wyoming:Cheyenne QUALITY ENGINEERING SINCE 1965 9L'02.15G. Mr. Hubert Hayworth ELI Project No. 22935161 Terracon We have appreciated being of service to you in the geotechnical engineering phase of this project, and are prepared to assist you during the construction phases as well. If you have any questions concerning this report or any of our testing, inspection, design and consulting services, please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, �.t�°�"Q,00�REQ, 4 EMPIRE LABORATbRIE-, INC. ?,\be''`g. le%eI A Division of Th erra on Companies, Inca CI" (2 e 9�' _j 27741 �1� - Eric S. Willis, P.E. %"•••••••• \ Geotechnical Engineer 14'.uuwnn+,,"" Reviewed by: ,,0 o,oG�Lctr, aittle64) a> .).�Q ss +off f e Ts. 4�•,. e° — Edward J. Paas, P.E. Longmont Office Manager ti /pjk �yFFSSIONP�ti;V Copies to: Addressee (3) Se0 rn Mr. Hubert Hayworth ELI Project No. 22935161 Terracon TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. Letter of Transmittal INTRODUCTION 1 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION 1 SITE EXPLORATION 2 Field Exploration 2 Laboratory Testing 2 SITE CONDITIONS 3 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 3 Geology 3 Soil and Bedrock Conditions 4 Laboratory Test Results 4 Groundwater Conditions 4 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5 General Considerations 5 Foundation Systems 5 Basement Construction 6 Lateral Earth Pressures 7 Floor Slab Design and Construction 7 Earthwork 8 General Considerations 8 Site Clearing 8 Excavation 8 Slab Subgrade Preparation 9 Fill Materials 9 Placement and Compaction 10 Compliance 10 Drainage 10 Surface Drainage 10 Additional Design and Construction Considerations 11 Exterior Slab Design and Construction 11 Underground Utility Systems 12 Corrosion Protection 12 GENERAL COMMENTS 12 a r r' Mr. Hubert Hayworth ELI Project No. 22935161 Terracon TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) Figure No. SITE PLAN 1 APPENDIX A Logs of Borings Al thru A3 APPENDIX B Laboratory Test Data: Swell-Consolidation Tests B1 Soil Properties 82 thru B3 APPENDIX C: GENERAL NOTES Drilling & Exploration Cl Unified Soil Classification C2 -- Bedrock Classification, Sedimentary Bedrock C3 Laboratory Testing, Significance and Purpose C4 Report Terminology C5 94_10 2::-7;13 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT Terracon HUBERT HAYWORTH RESIDENCE WELD COUNTY ROAD 21 WELD COUNTY, COLORADO ELI PROJECT NO. 22935161 INTRODUCTION This report contains the results of our geotechnical engineering exploration for the proposed single- family-residence to be located on the east side of Weld County Road No. 21, southeast of the town of Dacono, Colorado. The site is located in the Northwest 1/4 of Section 14, Township 1 North, Range 67 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, Weld County, Colorado. The purpose of these services is to provide information and geotechnical engineering recommendations relative to: • subsurface soil and bedrock conditions • groundwater conditions • foundation design and construction • basement construction • floor slab design and construction • earthwork • drainage The conclusions and recommendations contained in this report are based upon the results of field and laboratory testing, engineering analyses, and experience with similar soil and structural conditions. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION Based on information provided concerning construction, the proposed residence will be a single to two-story structure, and will include a wood-framed superstructure, supported on a reinforced concrete foundation system. As presently planned, the residence will be constructed with a full- depth basement pending evaluation of the soil and groundwater conditions. Maximum exterior wall loads are anticipated to be on the order of 1 to 3 kips per lineal foot; column loads are expected to range up to 30 kips. ✓�*.Cy 2_:•MUS; Mr. Hubert Hayworth ELI Project No. 22935161 Terracon SITE EXPLORATION The scope of the services performed for this project included site reconnaissance by a geotechnical engineer, a subsurface exploration program, laboratory testing and engineering analyses. _ Field Exploration: A total of 9 test borings were drilled to depths of 2% to 15 feet at the locations shown on the Site Plan, Figure 1. Two borings were drilled within the footprint of the proposed building, and 7 borings were drilled in the area of proposed septic system construction. All borings were advanced with a truck-mounted drilling rig, utilizing 4 and 6-inch diameter solid stem auger. Field percolation testing and evaluation for septic system construction on the site will be conducted by others. The location of borings were positioned in the field by the client. Elevations were taken of the ground surface at each boring location by measurements with an engineer's level from a bench mark (BM) shown on the Site Plan. The accuracy of boring locations and elevations should only be assumed to the level implied by the methods used to determine each. Continuous lithologic logs of each boring were recorded by the geotechnical engineer during the drilling operations. At selected intervals, samples of the subsurface materials were taken by means of pushing thin-walled Shelby tubes, or by driving split-spoon samplers. Penetration resistance measurements were taken with each sampling with the split-spoon sampler by driving the sampler with a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches. When properly interpreted, the penetration resistance is a useful index to the consistency, relative density or hardness of the materials encountered. Groundwater conditions were evaluated in each boring at the time of site exploration, and 7 days after drilling. Laboratory Testing: All samples retrieved during the field exploration were returned to the laboratory for evaluation by the project geotechnical engineer, and were classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification system described in Appendix C. Samples of bedrock were classified in accordance with the general notes for Bedrock Classification. At that time, the field descriptions were confirmed or modified as necessary,final boring logs prepared,and an applicable laboratory testing program was formulated to determine engineering properties of the subsurface materials. Boring Logs for the project are presented in Appendix A. Selected soil and bedrock samples were tested for the following engineering properties: 9 LI 0(yj�.� r-. . V .,h Lty Mr. Hubert Hayworth ELI Project No. 22935161 Terracon • Water content — • Dry density • Compression • Expansion • Soluble sulfate content _ The significance and purpose of each laboratory test is described in Appendix C. Laboratory test results are presented in Appendix B, and were used for the geotechnical engineering analyses, and the development of foundation and earthwork recommendations. All laboratory tests were performed in general accordance with applicable ASTM, local or other accepted standards. SITE CONDITIONS The site is currently vacant, and appears to have been used for agricultural purposes in the recent _ past. No evidence of extensive fills or underground facilities were observed at the time of our site reconnaissance. In general, open agricultural areas and scattered residential structures occupy the area surrounding the project site. The ground surface in the area of the construction slopes very gently to the southeast; review of the test boring elevations indicates 1 to 1 'h feet of topographic relief across the location of the borings. Site drainage was generally directed to the southeast by apparent sheetflow, although shallow depressions existed. At the time of the field exploration, the site was densely vegetated with a combination of native weeds and grasses. Other site features included a dry drainage/irrigation ditch near the northeastern corner of the property and scattered oil and/or gas pumping facilities adjacent to the property. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Geology: The proposed area is located within the Colorado Piedmont section of the Great Plains physiographic province. The Colorado Piedmont, formed during Late Tertiary and Early quaternary time (approximately two million (2,000,000) years ago), is a broad, erosional trench which separates the Southern Rocky Mountains from the High Plains. Structurally, the site lies along the western flank of the Denver Basin. During the Late Mesozoic and Early Cenozoic Periods (approximately seventy million (70,000,000) years ago), intense tectonic activity occurred, causing the uplifting of the Front Range and the associated downwarping of the Denver Basin to the east. Relatively flat uplands and broad valleys characterize the present-day topography of the Colorado Piedmont in this region. 9 02. �. Mr. Hubert Hayworth ELI Project No. 22935161 Terracon Mapping completed by the Colorado Geological Survey (1 Hart, 1972), indicates the site in an area — of "High Swell Potential". Potentially expansive materials mapped in this area include bedrock, weathered bedrock and colluvium (surficial units). Soil and Bedrock Conditions: As presented on Logs of Borings, topsoil was encountered at the surface in all boring locations. The materials underlying the topsoil and extending to the bedrock below consisted of sandy, calcareous clays of low to moderate plasticity. Sandstone-siltstone bedrock with claystone interbeds was encountered beneath the overburden materials at depths of 6 to 7 feet and extended to the maximum depth of exploration, 15 feet. As indicated by field penetration measurements, the sandy clays are typically stiff to very stiff in consistency. Slightly weathered bedrock was encountered in the upper portions of the strata; however, the underlying bedrock is medium hard, with hardness generally increasing with depth. Laboratory Test Results: Laboratory test results indicate that the near surface clays have low to moderate expansion potential and are capable of supporting moderate foundation loads. The siltstone-sandstone portions of the bedrock strata are considered to have low expansion characteristics; however, the claystone portions generally exhibit moderate expansion potential. Groundwater Conditions: Groundwater was not encountered in any test boring at the time of field exploration. However, when checked 7 days after drilling, groundwater was measured at depths of 13 to 13% feet, in the test borings. These observations represent only current groundwater conditions, and may not be indicative of other times, or at other locations. Groundwater levels can be expected to fluctuate with varying seasonal and weather conditions. Based upon review of U.S. Geological Survey maps (Hillier, et al, 1983), regional groundwater beneath the project area predominates in colluvial, landslide or windblown materials, or in fractured weathered consolidated sedimentary bedrock located at a depth near ground surface. Seasonal variations in groundwater conditions are expected since the aquifer materials may not be perennially saturated. Groundwater is generally encountered at depths ranging from 5 to 20 feet below ground surface; depth to seasonal groundwater is generally 10 feet or less. Zones of perched and/or trapped groundwater may also occur at times in the subsurface soils overlying bedrock, or within permeable fractures in the bedrock materials. The location and 'Hart, Stephen S., 1972, Potentially Swelling Soil and Rock in the Front Range Urban Corridor, Colorado, Colorado Geological Survey, Environmental Geology No. 7. 'Hillier, Donald E.; Schneider, Paul A., Jr.; and Hutchinson, E. Carter, 1983, Depth to Water Table /1976-1977) in the Greater Denver Area, Front Range Urban Corridor, Colorado,United States Geological Survey, Map I-856-K Mr. Hubert Hayworth ELI Project No. 22935161 Terracon amount of perched water is dependent upon several factors, including hydrologic conditions, type of site development, seasonal and weather conditions. Fluctuations in groundwater levels can best be determined by implementation of a groundwater monitoring plan. Such a plan would include installation of groundwater monitoring wells, and periodic measurement of groundwater levels over a sufficient period of time. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS General Considerations: The site appears suitable for the proposed construction. Potentially expansive soils and bedrock, will require particular attention in the design and construction. Slab-on-grade construction, for basement or garage areas, may be utilized provided that potential differential slab movements can be tolerated or accounted for in the design. Given the engineering characteristics of the sandy clays and portions of the bedrock, consideration should be given to use of structural floor systems in basement areas where these materials will be encountered. Foundation Systems: Due to the presence of moderately expansive clays and bedrock on the site, a grade beam and drilled pier foundation system is recommended for support of the proposed structure. Straight shaft piers, drilled a minimum of 5 feet into firm or harder bedrock, with a minimum shaft length of 12 feet are recommended. For axial compression loads, piers may be designed for a maximum end-bearing pressure of 15,000 pounds per square foot (psf), and skin friction of 1 ,500 psf for the portion of the pier in firm or harder bedrock. Required pier penetration should be balanced against potential uplift forces due to expansion of the subsoils and bedrock on the site. For design purposes, the uplift force on each pier can be determined on the basis of the following equation: Ur, = 25xD Where: U,, = the uplift force in kips, and D = the pier diameter in feet This uplift force should be resisted by a combination of actual dead load on each pier plus the resistance in side shear for the portion of the pier in bedrock. Only that portion of the pier below a depth of 7 feet, and in the bedrock strata should be considered to resist the potential uplift force. �� 01:473 Mr. Hubert Hayworth Terracon ELI Project No. 22935161 All piers should be reinforced full depth for the applied axial, lateral and uplift stresses imposed. The amount of reinforcing steel for expansion should be determined by the tensile force created by the uplift force on each pier. To minimize potential uplift forces on piers, use of long grade beam spans to increase individual pier loading, and small diameter piers are recommended. For this project, use of a minimum pier diameter of 10 inches is recommended. A minimum 4-inch or greater void space should be provided beneath grade beams between piers. The void material should be of suitable strength to support the weight of fresh concrete used in grade beam construction, and to avoid collapse when foundation backfill is placed. Drilling to design depths should be possible with conventional rotary or single flight power augers. Shafts will probably remain open without stabilizing measures. However, pier concrete should be on-site at the onset of pier construction and placed immediately after completion of drilling and cleaning. Due to potential sloughing and raveling, foundation concrete quantities may exceed calculated geometric volumes. Pier concrete with slump in the range of 4 to 6 inches is recommended. To provide increased resistance to potential uplift forces, the sides of each pier should be mechanically roughened in the bearing strata for the required depth of penetration. Pier bearing surfaces must be cleaned prior to concrete placement. A representative of the geotechnical engineer should inspect the bearing surface and pier configuration. All foundation walls and masonry walls should be reinforced to reduce the potential for distress caused by differential foundation movements. The use of joints at openings or other discontinuities in masonry walls is recommended. Foundation excavations should be observed by the geotechnical engineer. If the soil conditions encountered differ significantly from those presented in this report,supplemental recommendations will be required. Basement Construction: Groundwater was encountered on the site, 7 days after drilling, at depths of 13 to 13% feet. Therefore full-depth basement construction is considered acceptable on the site. Perched groundwater may occur at times since the subsurface soils are relatively impermeable and tend to trap water. Completion of site development, including installation of landscaping and irrigation systems, will likely lead to perched groundwater development. 3L: :5 Mr. Hubert Hayworth Terracon ELI Project No. 22935161 To reduce the potential for perched groundwater to impact foundation bearing soils and enter the basement of the structure, installation of a perimeter drainage system is recommended. The drainage system should be constructed around the exterior perimeter of the basement foundation, and sloped at a minimum 1/8 inch per foot to a suitable outlet, such as a sump and pump system or daylighted well beyond the foundation limits. The drainage system should consist of a properly sized perforated pipe, embedded in free-draining gravel, placed in a trench at least 12-inches in width. Gravel should extend a minimum of 3- inches beneath the bottom of the pipe, and at least 2 feet above the bottom of the foundation wall. The system should be underlain with a polyethylene moisture barrier, sealed to the foundation walls, and extending at least to the outer edge of the backfill zone. The gravel should be covered with drainage fabric prior to placement of foundation backfill. Lateral Earth Pressures: Fill against grade beams and retaining walls should be compacted to densities specified in "Earthwork." Compaction of each lift adjacent to walls should be accomplished with hand-operated tampers or other lightweight compactors. Overcompaction may cause excessive lateral earth pressures which could result in wall movements. Floor Slab Design and Construction: The variability of the existing soils and/or bedrock at approximate slab subgrade elevation could result in differential movement of floor slab-on-grade should expansive soils become elevated in moisture content. Differential slab movement on the order of 1 to 2 inches or more is possible. Use of structural floor systems, supported independent of the subgrade soils, is a positive means of eliminating the potentially detrimental effects of floor movement. If slab-on-grade is utilized, the subgrade soil should be prepared as outlined in the earthwork section of this report. Additional floor slab design and construction recommendations are as follows: • Positive separations and/or isolation joints should be provided between slabs and all foundations, columns or utility lines to allow independent movement. • Contraction joints should be provided in slabs to control the location and extent of cracking. Maximum joint spacing of 15 to 20 feet in each direction is recommended. • A minimum 2-inch void space should be constructed above, or below non-bearing partition walls placed on the floor slab. Special framing details should be provided at door jambs and frames within partition walls to avoid potential distortion. Partition walls should be isolated from suspended ceilings. iJY•0'Y:xda,.7;F Mr. Hubert Hayworth ELI Project No. 22935161 Terracon • Interior trench backfill placed beneath slabs should be compacted in accordance with recommended specifications outlined below. • The subgrade soils should be periodically pre-wetted prior to concrete placement. • Floor slabs should not be constructed on frozen subgrade. • Other design and construction considerations, as outlined in the ACI Design Manual, Section 302.1R are recommended. Earthwork: • General Considerations: The conclusions contained in this report for the proposed construction are contingent upon compliance with recommendations presented in this section. Although fills or underground facilities such as septic tanks, cesspools, basements, utilities were not observed during site reconnaissance, such features might be encountered during construction. • Site Clearing: 1 . Strip and remove existing vegetation, debris, topsoil and other deleterious materials from proposed building and pavement areas. All exposed surfaces should be free of mounds and depressions which could prevent uniform compaction. 2. If unexpected fills or underground facilities are encountered during site clearing, such features should be removed,the excavation thoroughly cleaned and backfilled. All excavations should be observed by the geotechnical engineer prior to backfill placement. 3. Stripped materials consisting of organic materials should be wasted from the site, or used to revegetate landscape areas after completion of grading operations. 4. All exposed areas which will receive fill, once properly cleared, should be scarified to a minimum depth of twelve inches, conditioned to near optimum moisture content, and compacted. • Excavation: Mr. Hubert Hayworth ELI Project No. 22935161 Terracon 1. It is anticipated that excavations for the proposed construction can be accomplished - with conventional earthmoving equipment. 2. As a safety measure, it is recommended that all vehicles and soil piles be kept to a minimum lateral distance from the crest of the slope/excavation equal to no less than the slope/excavation height. The exposed slope face should be protected _ against the elements. All excavations should be sloped or shored in the interest of safety following local, and federal regulations, including current OSHA excavation and trench safety standards. 3. Excavations penetrating the bedrock may require the use of specialized heavy-duty equipment. Drilling and blasting to facilitate rock break-up and removal is not anticipated. _ 4. Depending upon depth of excavation and seasonal conditions, groundwater may be encountered in excavations on the site. Pumping from sumps may be utilized to control water within excavations. 5. On-site clay soils may pump or become unstable or unworkable at high water contents. Workability may be improved by scarifying and drying. Overexcavation of wet zones and replacement with granular materials may be necessary. Lightweight excavation equipment may be required to reduce subgrade pumping. • Slab Subarade Preparation:Where existing soils will support floor slab, the soils should be scarified, moisture conditioned to optimum or above and compacted to a minimum depth of 12 inches. • Fill Materials: 1 . Clean on-site soils or imported materials may be used as fill material for the following: • general site grading • exterior slab areas • foundation areas • foundation backfill • interior floor slab areas 2. Frozen soils should not be used as fill or backfill. Mr. Hubert Hayworth ELI Project No. 22935161 Terracon 3. Imported soils (if required) should consist of non-expansive granular materials approved by the geotechnical engineer. • Placement and Compaction: 1. Place and compact fill in horizontal lifts, using equipment and procedures that will _ produce recommended moisture contents and densities throughout the lift. 2. Uncompacted fill lifts should not exceed 10 inches loose thickness. 3. No fill should be placed over frozen ground. 4. Materials should be compacted to the following: Minimum Percent Material Compaction(ASTM D698) On-site soils: Beneath foundations 95 Beneath slabs 90 Foundation backfill 90 Imported fill: Beneath foundations 95 Beneath slabs 95 Foundation backfill 90 On-site soils should be compacted within a moisture content range of 1 percent below, to 3 percent above optimum. Non-expansive, imported soils should be compacted within a moisture range of 3 percent below to 3 percent above optimum. • Compliance: Recommendations for slabs-on-grade, foundations and pavement elements supported on compacted fills or prepared subgrade depend upon compliance with "Earthwork" recommendations. To assess compliance, observation and testing should be performed under the direction of the geotechnical engineer. Drainage: • Surface Drainage: 91-104,5f; Mr. Hubert Hayworth ELI Project No. 22935161 Terracon 1 . Positive drainage should be provided during construction and maintained throughout the life of the proposed facility. Infiltration of water into utility or foundation excavations must be prevented during construction. Planters and other surface features which could retain water in areas adjacent to the building or pavements should be sealed or eliminated. 2. In areas where sidewalks or paving do not immediately adjoin the structure, we recommend that protective slopes be provided with a minimum grade of approximately 10 percent for at least 10 feet from perimeter walls. Backfill against footings, exterior walls, and in utility and sprinkler line trenches should be well compacted and free of all construction debris to reduce the possibility of moisture infiltration. 3. Downspouts, roof drains or scuppers should discharge into splash blocks or extensions when the ground surface beneath such features is not protected by exterior slabs or'paving. 4. Sprinkler systems should not be installed within 5 feet of foundation walls. Landscape irrigation adjacent to the foundation system should be minimized or eliminated. Additional Design and Construction Considerations: • Exterior Slab Design and Construction: Compacted subgrade or existing clay soils will expand with increasing moisture content; therefore, exterior concrete grade slabs may heave, resulting in cracking or vertical offsets. The potential for damage would be greatest where exterior slabs are constructed adjacent to the building or other structural elements. To reduce the potential for damage, we recommend: • exterior slabs be supported on fill with no, or very low expansion potential • strict moisture-density control during placement of subgrade fills • placement of effective control joints on relatively close centers and isolation joints between slabs and other structural elements • provision for adequate drainage in areas adjoining the slabs • use of designs which allow vertical movement between the exterior slabs and adjoining structural elements • exterior slabs should not be dowelled into the foundation wall In those locations where movement of exterior slabs cannot be tolerated or must be held to an absolute minimum, consideration should be given to: Mr. Hubert Hayworth ELI Project No. 22935161 Terracon • constructing slabs with a stem or key-edge, a minimum of 6 inches in width and at least 12 inches below grade; • supporting keys or stems on drilled piers; or • providing structural exterior slabs supported on foundations similar to the building. • Underground Utility Systems: All underground piping within or near the proposed structure should be designed with flexible couplings, so minor deviations in alignment do not result in breakage or distress. Utility knockouts in grade beams should be oversized to accommodate differential movements. • Corrosion Protection: Results of soluble sulfate testing indicate that ASTM Type II Portland cement should be specified for all project concrete on and below grade. Foundation concrete should be designed in accordance with the provisions of the ACI Design Manual, Section 318-121 . GENERAL COMMENTS It is recommended that the Geotechnical Engineer be retained to provide a general review of final design plans and specifications in order that grading and foundation recommendations may be interpreted and implemented. In the event that any changes of the proposed project are planned, the conclusions and recommendations contained in this report should be reviewed and the report modified or supplemented as necessary. The Geotechnical Engineer should also be retained to provide services during excavation, grading, foundation and construction phases of the work. Observation of pier excavations should be performed prior to placement of reinforcing and concrete to confirm that satisfactory bearing _ materials are present and is considered a necessary part of continuing geotechnical engineering services for the project. Construction testing including field and laboratory evaluation of concrete and steel should be performed to determine whether applicable requirements have been met. It would be logical for Empire Laboratories, Inc. to provide these services since we are most qualified to determine consistency of field conditions with those data used in our analyses. The analyses and recommendations in this report are based in part upon data obtained from the field exploration. The nature and extent of variations beyond the location of test borings may not - become evident until construction. If variations then appear evident, it may be necessary to reevaluate the recommendations of this report. 94'0 .,4 Mr. Hubert Hayworth ELI Project No. 22935161 Terracon Our professional services were performed using that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable geotechnical engineers practicing in this or similar localities. No warranty, express or implied, is made. We prepared the report as an aid in design of the proposed project. This report is not a bidding document. Any contractor reviewing this report must draw his own conclusions regarding site conditions and specific construction techniques to be used on this project. This report is for the exclusive purpose of providing geotechnical engineering and/or testing information and recommendations. The scope of services for this project does not include, either specifically or by implication, any environmental assessment of the site or identification of contaminated or hazardous materials or conditions. If the owner is concerned about the potential for such contamination, other studies should be undertaken. We are available to discuss the scope of such studies with you. pU� [4 LOG OF BORING NO. TB-7 Page 1 of 1 OWNER ARCHITECT/ENGINEER Hubert Hayworth SITE Weld County Road 21 PROJECT Weld County, Colorado Hayworth Residence �ry SAMPLES TESTS O a0 W - • a E cn zx DESCRIPTION aj Zvi Z°x U W O O Aw Uxw O Approx. Surface Elev.: 100.1 ft. A A Z w Pa. Aveia "•"• 0.5 99.6 \TOPSOIL CL SS 10 21.1 ST 12.3 100 11260 CLAY, with sand, slightly silty,brown,dry, _ SS 13 14.7 medium stiff to stiff, low plasticity, slightly porous soil structure, calcareous. 5 7.0 93.1 ST 5.4 SS 40 5.8 10- SILTSTONE/SANDSTONE BEDROCK, _ with gray claystone interbeds, gray to tan,weathered for upper region,hard. _ SS 50 16.9 15.0 85.1 15 THE STRATIFICATION LINES REPRESENT THE APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY LINES Calibrated Hand Penetrometer* BETWEEN SOIL AND ROCK TYPES: IN-SITU,THE TRANSITION MAY BE GRADUAL. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS BORING STARTED 12-14.93 WL 4 pry 0Ha. = 13'5" 7 Days Empire Laboratories BORING COMPLETED 12-14-93 WL Incorporated RIG cw-55 FOREMAN TDK Division of Terracon Wt APPROVED ESW JOB# 22935161 it 94045G • + LOG OF BORING NO. TB-2 Page 1 of 1 OWNER ARCHITECT/ENGINEER _ Hubert Hayworth SITE Weld County Road 21 PROJECT Weld County, Colorado Hayworth Residence SAMPLES TESTS - O a0 a4 ?" O o � Rn a w rn zx U DESCRIPTION c w > zc w Ot7 v p a. O O O q w t) 44 0 Approx. Surface Elev.: 99.3 ft. A ] z EH-' aw Aa mina -- ‘CAnA 0.5^ ' TOPSOA 98.8 f/ \ c _ CL SS 12 20.8 ST 11.1 95 7800 CLAY, with sand, slightly silty,brown, dry, : medium stiff to stiff, low plasticity, SS 12 13.1 slightly porous soil structure, calcareous. — 5 — yl 6.0 93.3 ST 3.2 SS 46 2.2 10- SII,TST ONE/SANTDSTONE BEDROCK, — — with gray claystone interbeds, gray to tan,weathered for upper region, hard. — — y — SS 50/10 18.0 �' 15.0 84.3 — 15 BOTTOM OF BORING THE STRATIFICATION LINES REPRESENT THE APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY LINES Calibrated Hand Penetrometer' BETWEEN SOIL AND ROCK TYPES: IN-S FU,THE TRANSITION MAY BE GRADUAL. - WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS BORING STARTED 12-14-93 WL SZ Dry °Has. = 13'3° 7Days Empire Laboratories BORING COMPLETED 12-14-93 WL Incorporated RIG cME-55 FOREMAN TDK Division of Terracon WL APPROVED ESW JOB/1 22935161 y1U4 6 LOG OF BORING NO. TB-3 Page 1 of 1 OWNER ARCHITECT/ENGINEER Hubert Hayworth SITE Weld County Road 21 -PROJECT Weld County, Colorado Hayworth Residence SAMPLES TESTS t C DESCRIPTION • co g >-. fx w • 1-8 z x z -E. z > zy A O w U � t C) o h w 0 Approx. Surface Elev.: 99.3 ft. A ] Z wa (ta'�i Cw '(2. 1"v�'ia`) — 0.5 98.8 \TOPSOII / _ CL _ CLAY,with sand, slightly silty, brown, dry, — medium stiff to stiff, low plasticity, slightly porous soil structure,calcareous. 5— 6.5 92.8 — SS 10 2.4 SILTSTONE/SANDSTONE BEDROCK, - 8.0 91.3 l with gray claystone interbeds, gray to — tan, weathered for upper region, hard. 1 BOTTOM OF BORING THE STRATIFICATION LATER REPRESENT THE APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY LINES Calibrated Hand Penctromctcr BETWEEN SOIL AND ROCK TYPES: IN-SITU,THE TRANSITION MAY BE GRADUAL. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS BORING STARTED 12-14-93 WL SZ Dry 0Hrs. i Dry 7 Days Empire Laboratories BORING COMPLETED 12-14-93 WL Incorporated RIG CME-ss FOREMAN TDK Division of Terracon WL APPROVED ESW JOB# 1;23stL • , IP,0.1GAttON 5WALE . . . N A % 4 ,. A N Y ,( .t .f ) I I ' P-2 P-1 I • • P t •B3• P-3 TB-2B P-lo • • 4-5 _ PsoposaP RESItENcc / Ten e NAIL SET TB-1 !9 / IN N, SIDE OF FENCE PoST / F SITE PLAN OD SCALE l" _ (gol- 0" Empire Laboratories Incorporated Division of Terracon FIGURE L 940$ 4 - - 3 2 1 S w L _ L � k O N -1 O A -2 1 O ti -3 -4 6.1 1 10 APPLIED PRESSURE-KIPS PER SQUARE FT Specimen Identification Classification DD MC% • TB-1 3.0 Clay, silty and sandy, stiff, sli. calc., orange-brn 102 21 PROJECT Hayworth Residence -Weld County Road 21 JOB NO. 22935161 DATE 12/29/93 1-D CONSOLIDATION--SWELL TEST Empire Laboratories, Inc. Longmont, Colorado 4 4-. I Lb LC) Lb lb U) C a) Y C 0 O 0 CQ ° U 0 0put* I c0 N 7 ling(L a0 g Y! E y a co E Y .my 3* • 2 Y it U H 0 C C 0 aci a is A C. V E d C> E 7 • H S¢ 7 E CC d E x 1n H X Al ii ° E o _ S. E N i c e c cO W .►a 0 £2 1O tall :)u al. U) 0 0 E 5 cc F- H W ¢ IL Q N N I 2 ¢ ¢ cn W wt )n We - II- I0 f II Pi o a a Z .Y • O o O VO W =.i Lb In C .a N W o 0 c T T .�c Wr' - e 0 WPM I. 'e, _ m - .7. p f' ; Z W 8 3 _E E y ANN u, d x x E W O N .r. O O ...a' 4- 00 0 e o o a- aE -o CC =0 Nc° 7 ° 7 )72 1.V LC Y ;X a) > E > E O ._ C N 0 7 N m)a a � OJYl a J Z O` 0 C O C O O y a U AMC.. E 7 03o3 °V EE O - Er a) V 0-O 0V TN co a c cm O c Y m > m > c> �cV J R 0 Eay, m w c E E �� >Y 7 'O O ._ O . 7 7 .N u. O U hU wco6 E > 8 a) '' o') N a a0 Q) Y N CO.* In t 3e N a) Y 2 -0 O 0 U C. 0 O 0) wm or- O `a. O a) =. O m o . C m 3 'O -O O C 'O"O n J N L O ... ry �,... cc "O g y J J C> 0) N c0 i c cl C I O 0 U 'v) d A Env'3'm to f" C H co_ o 2D00 d UY __ C H 1a '-0413 0 0 0 $ �' 4--. .C C. to' m n7 of wag 0 r) a N a) ' Ca,WNw. ��9 O m c Y Y c c o o O .F. E0000000 C 1-1 y 0 1- C CCCC co o ° e jOa »OOO z m = 0 .C en( uD07 $ Z (/) 0010=I 0 000 9e® sC I € L!) LO U) Iq U) IL) Lb LO O Y d • •O 00 V�.y O U 0) iN G m_ e N N on E r 0 N O V1 coC t%m o E a pa CO ••0 > imi O —. 3� L CO F� O U • to •(a-' in ...) c Ct O C N ImI 100 Y m 3. E 0cu 4> E E g ct r •X ►•a 03 E w S. E y o n 61 C t `c e co m U) ••r 0 o g N �w ow Iwe Y O a A cc N W Q c Q LL a' 2 •Y Q Q N O W Lii V aC N c O O co a Z as 0 o o O O if 3 m m d C (O C `c > > '�' 'C -_ cn w 1 s 0 Y y N 0) O W LY C C O CO CO a7 p Him W �r 0 E E H CC N N w -E -x -x d o — W0N J 0 O - mit w a—: a.-. 0OOZ ay 0 7I:0. XCO . cO� � ci ' > oEO> dm oaay0)JZ •0 Yccf° - ao � � J Qg i C -co o'O o � N N N W 0) • 0 Y O) 0).— O (0 o Zr N N > 00 > N d CU W 6 C E ra E-c.0 .1 A 0) 01 L'O) >j N c U yU Hc'no E > `s N N 0 U . N CO 'Cr LO ts • a 03 C) N o3 N a• rc N E 0 EU 7 0_ N 0 I• O) V4. n a O} V 4 C N A" Ui v C C m co c a m O > C�0) m O C V L C 'O O . to 0) 0)la;m Q J J J a▪) _,CI d"O 'N c f0 a U U U N 2 4aDccf° w OF - J H cn O y000 m 0 "U a) •C N N N-O .-00-04) N .e L L L C 0 A t6 10 C 0 CO a N CO a 0 tOC[n fn C C -0-6 -5 d 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 c C 0 0 0 Npb »UUU i COco• t , . t , . , ea N .Q1. t t/)Ul"D" O Z CDo0UII 0UUU DRILLING AND EXPLORATI DRILLING & SAMPLING SYMBOLS: SS : Split Spoon - 1W I.D., 2" O.D., unless otherwise noted PS : Piston Sample ST : Thin-Walled Tube - 2" O.D., unless otherwise noted WS : Wash Sample R : Ring Barrel Sampler - 2.42" I.D., 3" O.D. unless otherwise noted. PA : Power Auger FT : Fish Tail Bit HA : Hand Auger RB : Rock Bit DB Diamond Bit = 4", N, B BS : Bulk Sample AS : Auger Sample PM : Pressure Meter HS : Hollow Stem Auger DC : Dutch Cone WB : Wash Bore Penetration Test: Blows per foot of a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches on a 2-inch O.D. split spoon, except where noted. WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENT SYMBOLS: WL : Water Level WS : While Sampling WCI : Wet Cave in WD : While Drilling DCI : Dry Cave in BCR : Before Casing Removal AB : After Boring ACR : After Casting Removal Water levels indicated on the boring logs are the levels measured in the borings at the time indicated. In pervious soils, the indicated levels may reflect the location of groundwater. In low permeability soils, the accurate determination of groundwater levels is not possible with only short term observations. DESCRIPTIVE SOIL CLASSIFICATION PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF BEDROCK Soil Classification is based on the Unified Soil Classification DEGREE OF WEATHERING: system and the ASTM Designations D-2487 and D-2488. Coarse Grained Soils have more than 50% of their dry Slight Slight decomposition of parent material on weight retained on a #200 sieve; they are described as: joints. May be color change. boulders, cobbles, gravel or sand. Fine Grained Soils have less than 50%of their dry weight retained on a#200 sieve; Moderate Some decomposition and color change they are described as: clays, if they are plastic, and silts if throughout. they are slightly plastic or non-plastic. Major constituents may be added as modifiers and minor constituents may be High Rock highly decomposed, may be extremely added according to the relative proportions based on grain broken. size. In addition to gradation, coarse grained soils are . defined on the basis of their relative in-place density and HARDNESS AND DEGREE OF CEMENTATION: fine grained soils on the basis of their consistency. Limestone and Dolomite: Example: Lean clay with sand, trace gravel, stiff ICL); silty Hard Difficult to scratch with knife. sand, trace gravel, medium dense (SM). Moderately Can be scratched easily with knife, CONSISTENCY OF FINE-GRAINED SOILS Hard Cannot be scratched with fingernail. Unconfined Compressive Soft Can be scratched with fingernail. -Strength, Cu, psf Consistency Shale, Siltstone and Claystone: < 500 Very Soft Hard Can be scratched easily with knife, cannot 500 - 1,000 Soft be scratched with fingernail. 1,001 - 2,000 Medium 2,001 - 4,000 Stiff Moderately Can be scratched with fingernail. 4,001 - 8,000 Very Stiff Hard 8,001 - 16,000 Very Hard Soft Can be easily dented but not molded with RELATIVE DENSITY OF COARSE-GRAINED SOILS: fingers. N-Blows/ft Relative Density 0-3 Very Loose Sandstone and Conglomerate: 4.9 Loose Well Capable of scratching a knife blade. 10-29 Medium Dense Cemented 30-49 Dense 50-80 Very Dense Cemented Can be scratched with knife. 80 + Extremely Dense Poorly Can be broken apart easily with fingers. Cemented Empire Laboratories, Inc. A Division of The Terracon Companies, Inc. 940 ~c ,JNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SrSTEM Sol Classification Criteria for Assigning Group Symbols and Group Names Using Laboratory Test" Group Group Name' Symbol Coarse-Grained Gravels more than Clean Gravels Less Cu>4 and 1 <Cc≤3° GW Weil-graded gravel° Soils more than 50% of coarse than 5% finest 50% retained on fraction retained on No. 200 sieve No. 4 sieve Cu < 4 and/or 1 > Cc > 3° GP Poorly graded gravel' Gravels with Fines o Fines classify as ML or MH GM Silty gravel,G,H more than 12% fines Fines classify as CL or CH GC Clayey graveli°'1 Sands 50% or more Clean Sands Less Cu > 8 and 1 ≤Cc≤3t SW Well-graded sand' of coarse fraction than 5% finest passes No.4 sieve Cu < 6 and/or 1 > Cc > 3° SP Poorly graded sand' _ Sands with Fines Fines classify as ML or MH SM Silty sand°-" more than 12% fines° °"� Fines Classify as CL or CH SC Clayey sand Fine-Grained Soils Silts and Clays inorganic PI > 7 and plots on or above "A line" CL Lean clay°''" -- 50% or more Liquid limit less passes the than 50 PI < 4 or plots below "A" line' ML Silt's`m No. 200 sieve g 1Fu°+I organic Liquid limit -oven dried Organic cla < 0.75 OL Liquid limit -not dried Organic silts""° Silts and Clays inorganic PI plots on or above "A" line CH Fat clays"" Liquid limit 50 or more PI lots below "A" line MH Elastic Silts"' organic Liquid limit -oven dried Organic clays u"" < 0.75 OH Liquid limit -not dried Organic silt's-m.° -- Highly organic soils Primarily organic matter, dark in color, and organic odor PT Peat ABased on the material passing the 3-in. tlf soil contains 15 to 29%plus No. 200, add (75-mm) sieve 'Cu-D D C° (DJ "with sand" or "with gravel", whichever is elf field sample contained cobbles or t°1 10 D x Dw predominant. t° boulders, or both, add "with cobbles or If soil contains>30% plus No. 200 boulders, or both" to group name. predominantly sand, add "sandy" to group °Gravels with 5 to 12%fines require dual 'If soil contains > 15%sand, add "with name. symbols: sand" to group name. kilt soil contains > 30% plus No. 200, OW-GM well-graded gravel with silt °If fines classify as CL-NIL, use dual symbol predominantly gravel, add "gravelly" to group GW-GC well-graded gravel with clay GC-GM, or SC-SM. name. GP-GM poorly graded gravel with silt "If fines are organic, add "with organic fines" "PI > 4 and plots on or above "A" line. GP-GC poorly graded gravel with clay to group name. °PI < 4 or plots below "A" line. °Sands with 5 to 12%fines require dual Iif soil contains > 15% gravel, add "with "PI plots on or above "A" line. symbols: gravel" to group name. °PI plots below "A" line. SW-SM well-graded sand with silt It Atterberg limits plot in shaded area, soil is SW-SC well-graded sand with clay a CL-ML, silty clay. SP-SM poorly graded sand with silt SP-SC poorly graded sand with clay w I / For tlN alkM el I gmgroin.' soil. and fInt-airoinod fraction of coon., C." tIlcnantal at A> 1 to LL • 215 � ".Ir �. E q""M "0.75 ILL - M • ) I � I O+ .1: K w -tw?tlw.el V—G. 0q- La Vortical at LL" ta ton -7. CI w" cl .ag (LL- e) i G z so v Oi' P 2° # a. O MH • aOR OH +o — 4 //toneF74044" ML OR 0L l i I I o +a to ro 5o w w w ro w w +w ++c LIQUID LIMIT (LL) Empire Laboratories, Inc. A Division of The Terracon CompankAPf iLi -a it). ROCK CLASSIFICATION (Based on ASTM C-294) Sedimentary Rocks Sedimentary rocks are stratified materials laid down by water or wind. The sediments may be composed of particles of pre-existing rocks derived by mechanical weathering, evaporation or by chemical or organic origin. The sediments are usually indurated by cementation or compaction. Chert Very fine-grained siliceous rock composed of micro-crystalline or crypto- crystalline quartz, chalcedony or opal. Chert is various colored, porous to dense, hard and has a conchoidal to splintery fracture. Claystone Fine-grained rock composed of or derived by erosion of silts and clays or any rock containing clay. Soft massive; gray, black, brown, reddish or green and may contain carbonate minerals. Conglomerate Rock consisting of a considerable amount of rounded gravel, sand and cobbles with or without interstitial or cementing material. The cementing or interstitial material may be quartz, opal, calcite, dolomite, clay, iron oxides or other materials. Dolomite A fine-grained carbonate rock consisting of the mineral dolomite [CaMg (CO3)2]. May contain noncarbonate impurities such as quartz, chert, clay minerals, organic matter, gypsum and sulfides. Reacts with hydrochloric acid (HCL). Limestone A fine-grained carbonate rock consisting of the mineral calcite (CaCo3). May contain noncarbonate impurities such as quartz, chert, clay minerals, organic matter, gypsum and sulfides. Reacts with hydrochloric acid (HCL). Sandstone Rock consisting of particles of sand with or without interstitial and cementing materials. The cementing or interstitial material may be quartz, opal, calcite, dolomite, clay, iron oxides or other material. Shale Fine-grained rock composed of, or derived by erosion of silts and clays or any rock containing clay. Shale is hard, platy, or fissile may be gray, black, reddish or green and may contain some carbonate minerals(calcareous shale). Siltstone Fine grained rock composed of, or derived by erosion of silts or rock containing silt. Siltstones consist predominantly of silt sized particles(0.0625 _ to 0.002 mm in diameter) and are intermediate rocks between claystones and sandstones, may be gray, black, brown, reddish or green and may contain carbonate minerals. Empire Laboratories, Inc. A Division of The Terracon Companies, Inc. 940456 LABORATORY TESTS SIGNIFICANCE AND PURPOSE TEST SIGNIFICANCE PURPOSE California Used to evaluate the potential strength of subgrade soil, Pavement _ Bearing subbase, and base course material, including recycled Thickness Ratio materials for use in road and airfield pavements. Design Used to develop an estimate of both the rate and amount of Foundation Consolidation both differential and total settlement of a structure. Design Used to determine the consolidated drained shear strength of Bearing Capacity, Direct Shear soil or rock. Foundation Design & Slope Stability Dry Used to determine the in-place density of natural, inorganic, Index Property - Density fine-grained soils. Soil Behavior Used to measure the expansive potential of fine-grained soil Foundation & Slab Expansion and to provide a basis for swell potential classification. Design Used for the quantitative determination of the distribution of Soil Gradation particle sizes in soil. Classification Liquid & Used as an integral part of engineering classification systems Plastic Limit, to characterize the fine-grained fraction of soils, and to Soil Plasticity specify the fine-grained fraction of construction materials. Classification Index _.. Used to determine the capacity of soil or rock to conduct a Groundwater Permeabi/ify liquid or gas. Flow Analysis H Used to determine the degree of acidity or alkalinity of a soil. Corrosion P Potential Used to indicate the relative ability of a soil medium to carry Corrosion Resistivity electrical currents. Potential Used to evaluate the potential strength of subgrade soil, Pavement R-Value subbase, and base course material, including recycled Thickness materials for use in road and airfield pavements. Design Soluble Used to determine the quantitative amount of soluble Corrosion Sulphate sulfates within a soil mass. Potential To obtain the approximate compressive strength of soils that Bearing Capacity Unconfined possess sufficient cohesion to permit testing in the Analysis - Compression unconfined state. for Foundations Water Used to determine the quantitative amount of water in a soil Index Property Content mass. Soil Behavior Empire Laboratories, Inc. A Division of The Terracon Comp aries,Jnc REPORT TERMINOLOGY (Based on ASTM D653) • Allowable Soil The recommended maximum contact stress developed at the interface of the Bearing Capacity foundation element and the supporting material. Alluvium Soil, the constituents of which have been transported in suspension by flowing water and subsequently deposited by sedimentation. Aggregate Base A layer of specified material placed on a subgrade or subbase usually beneath Course slabs or pavements. Backfrll A specified material placed and compacted in a confined area. Bedrock A natural aggregate of mineral grains connected by strong and permanent cohesive forces. Usually requires drilling, wedging, blasting or other methods of extraordinary force for excavation. • Bench A horizontal surface in a sloped deposit. Caisson (Drilled pier A concrete foundation element cast in a circular excavation which may have an or Shaft) enlarged base. Sometimes referred to as a cast-in-place pier or drilled shaft. Coefficient of A constant proportionality factor relating normal stress and the corresponding Friction shear stress at which sliding starts between the two surfaces. Coluuvium Soil, the constituents of which have been deposited chiefly by gravity such as at the foot of a slope or cliff. Compaction The densification of a soil by means of mechanical manipulation. Concrete Slab-on- A concrete surface layer cast directly upon a base, subbase or subgrade, and Grade typically used as a floor system. Differential Unequal settlement or heave between, or within foundation elements of a Movement structure. Earth Pressure The pressure or force exerted by soil on any boundary such as a foundation wall. ESAL Equivalent Single Axle Load, a criteria used to convert traffic to a uniform standard, (18,000 pound axle loads). Engineered Fill Specified material placed and compacted to specified density and/or moisture conditions under observations of a representative of a geotechnical engineer. Equivalent Fluid A hypothetical fluid having a unit weight such that it will produce a pressure against a lateral support presumed to be equivalent to that produced by the actual soil. This simplified approach is valid only when deformation conditions _ are such that the pressure increases linearly with depth and the wall friction is neglected. Existing Fill(or Materials deposited through the action of man prior to exploration of the site. man-made fill) Existing Grade The ground surface at the time of field exploration. Empire Laboratories, Inc. A Division of The Terracon Compani t., 5 ; REPORT TERMINOLOGY (Based on ASTM D653) Expansive Potential The potential of a soil to expand (increase in volume) due to absorption of moisture. Finished Grade The final grade created as a part of the project. Footing A portion of the foundation of a structure that transmits loads directly to the soil. Foundation The lower part of a structure that transmits the loads to the soil or bedrock. Frost Depth The depth of which the ground becomes frozen during the winter season. Grade Beam A foundation element or wall, typically constructed of reinforced concrete, used to span between other foundation elements such as drilled piers. Groundwater Subsurface water found in the zone of saturation of soils, or within fractures in bedrock. Heave Upward movement. Lithologic The characteristics which describe the composition and texture of soil and rock by observation. Native Grade The naturally occuring ground surface. Native Soil Naturally occurring on-site soil, sometimes referred to as natural soil. Optimum Moisture The water content at which a soil can be compacted to a maximum dry unit Content weight by a given compactive effort. Perched Water Groundwater, usually of limited area maintained above a normal water elevation by the presence of an intervening relatively impervious continuing stratum. Scarify To mechanically loosen soil or break down existing soil structure. Settlement • Downward movement. Skin Friction (Side The frictional resistance developed between soil and an element of structure Shear) such as a drilled pier or shaft. Soil(earth) Sediments or other unconsolidated accumulations of solid particles produced by the physical and chemical disintegration of rocks, and which may or may not contain organic matter. Strain The change in length per unit of length in a given direction. Stress The force per unit area acting within a soil mass. Strip To remove from present location. Subbase A layer of specified material in a pavement system between the subgrade and base course. Subgrade The soil prepared and compacted to support a structure, slab or pavement system. Empire Laboratories, Inc. A Division of The Terracon Companieedo :.y3 NAMES OF OWNERS OF PROPERTY WITHIN 500 FEET Please print or type NAME ADDRESS, TOWN/CITY, ASSESSOR'S PARCEL STATE AND ZIP CODE IDENTIFICATION I/ '30,441n1 Fs4akts 3871 I,JcR 2I ILIb9l5ooao6,o F� Lupfoa Co 8a621 31MMIL Pk + Pau,ltit. L 1tf4 I E . [03 PL. 4O/ Otooq-5 MAn)Mk k t* ' Co S0233 Euyat A t %05 (A)CR. as DovtR.sb�� Fr Lupta o62I NON 000b35 AktIttad F Buck 3lel5 ktI; I3 K4(MJLIOCi b4`? natL, C.o &oSIIR ,)1Abi? PALYo 3S-72 C CR 21 I4(09I4000052. (FNA t-.1sa,y Pr Lu9-lo Co W2 ) 94O sG N 2. S a 4/4f/-7-- s' . /1 7-/.4/ /P 7u- oc 615- Lt. NAMES OF OWNERS OF PROPERTY WITHIN 500 FEET Please print or type N1tORALS AND /Ma Su&SuRcAct ��TkLL NAME ADDRESS, TOWN/CITY, ASSESSOR'S PARCEL STATE AND ZIP CODE IDENTIFICATION f/ r\M 15 /IA . C-AVAIJAW.,÷i 1441 1 1 os PL. 4t3t CMJMRu611 ,J(WAM5 4M-16(1/0A , CD Fs-623i buAN)t Es &ok oonl 310 7.174 S aso SusA A . C oRooii Lu Qron)t Co C)62.1 Lzss2z. - AltitbC13 CI L. Co . c:04s j Hello