The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About931385.tiff FINAL PLAN DEL CAMINO PRERELEASE CENTER PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Submitted To The Weld County Planning Commission and The Weld County Board of Commissioners By The Villa At Greeley, Inc. September 2, 1993 9 31.3 b THE MIK ilpEgniff5F,J. SEP 2199S !M!!County Planning '� Co 9a1249 INTRODUCTION TO FINAL PUD PLAN DEL CAMINO PRERELEASE CENTER Weld County has recognized in its Comprehensive Plan for the 1-25 Mixed Use Development Area that expanded urbanization growth shall continue in south Weld County. Population and economic growth will create a demand for conversion of land to urban uses and development. The County Planning goals for the 1-25 Mixed Use Area are to direct anticipated urbanization growth to areas where infrastructure utilities can accommodate proposed development. City municipal borders and specified highway locations are referenced on the Conceptual Land Use Plan to accommodate urbanization growth while at the same time preserving agricultural land that is not within the anticipated growth areas. The Del Camino Prerelease Facility meets the County Urban Growth Goals as referenced in the comprehensive plan as follows: ■ By site locating at a major transportation/arterial highway interchanges where all utility services are in place and utilizing a site that is highly accessible. ■ By maintaining P.U.D. land use regulations that control overall devel- opment of the Fort Junction P.U.D. District. ■ By establishing an acceptable P.U.D. growth boundary to adjacent conceptual land use activities proposed on the plan. ■ By providing a high quality architectural building design, an overall landscape development plan, efficient access and on-site traffic circulation and site lighting and signage sensitive to the overall project development. The Planned Unit Development conforms to the Fort Junction P.U.D. District Plan approved in December of 1988. The District Plan specifically references commercial/industrial land uses allowed in 54.0 acre tract as follows 1-1 - 10 acres, 215,000 SF, 10.0 acres (Approved Concept Plan) C1 through C4 - 22 acres, 470,000 SF, 22.0 acres (Approved Concept Plan) 9a1249 Commercial - 22.24 acres, 123,000 SF, 22.24 acres (Proposed Final Plan) In the previously approved P.U.D. plan, 470,000 building square feet was identi- fied for commercial use on 22 acres in this development. The Villa is now propos- ing in its final P.U.D. application, 123,000 square feet on the twenty-two acre site. The proposed 22 acre P.U.D. Prerelease Center site meets all required development standards as required in the Plat Notes (Reference Items A through M inclusive). Attached is information regarding the Prerelease Center's purpose, operations and programs, as well as answers to common non-land use issues raised regarding the facility. Attached is A Private Preoarole Prison in the Local Economy and an Addendum To A Private Preoarole Prison in the Local Economy, both authored by researcher Ann Garrison of the University of Northern Colorado. Also attached is an overview of the Colorado Department of Corrections, highlighting that only 15.9% of its prison population is properly classified for the Prerelease Facility. 9Z1249 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR THE DEL CAMINO PRERELEASE CENTER Compatibility The 22.24 acre development is compatible with other proposed uses planned with the 54 acre Fort Junction PUD District. Refer to Architect's Application Reponse Item No. 12 addressing site design/on-site buffering and adjacent site uses. Refer to Architect's Application Response Item No. 11, 24 and 28 addressing the general use, building design, specifications for landscaping, and life-safety operation of the proposed facility. Common Open Space Common open space is provided on the west and north frontage setbacks of the Prerelease Center which includes drainage detention adjacent to the roadway right-of-way space and a landscaped parkway space adjacent to the parking lots. Bench seating and outdoor public space is provided at the Administration Entry. All on-site open space shall be maintained on a regular basis by the develop- er/Owner. All open space adjacent to the Prerelease Center shall be com- pleted and maintained as a part of the initial and operations project development cost. Water and Sewer Provision The entire 54 acre PUD shall be serviced by a Public Water System for domestic use (Weld Central Water District) and a sewer system (St. Vrain Sanitation District). These two utility infrastructures can comfortably service the demand for domestic water, fire protection, and sanitation waste for the proposed development. Circulation Two vehicular access points are proposed for access to the overall project. They shall provide separation of staff/emergency and public vehicular access to the site and provide a fire safety loop drive access to the perimeter of the facility and minimizes 90° turning radiuses for large fire protection equip- ment. Refer to Engineer's Application Reponse Item No. 9, and 18. 931249 Buffering The building facility is sited in such a manner to enfront public/service activities to the west (parking, service deliveries, administration services) and to provide screened, privatized, protected outdoor spaces for staff/inmates on the east building facade. Earth berming, fence screening and trees shall provide desired screening of open outdoor activity space. No adjacent future commercially zoned properties are within 600 feet of the project screened fenced area. Site Plan Review A site plan review will be filed in the future. Future Growth Over the next ten to fifteen years, urbanization of the 1-25 corridor north of Denver shall continue to take place. Concentrated urbanization development shall continue at east-west State Highway intersections where the utility infrastructure is in place to address higher density land use needs as referenced in the mixed use develop- ment plan. The land north of WCR 24-1/2 and 1-25 Frontage Road owned by Weld County shall most likely be used for sand and gravel mining for fifteen to twenty years. Speculation of use beyond that period would suggest that a recreational reclama- tion land use similar to State of Colorado recreation space north west of the project site shall take place. The land one half mile east to Road 9-3/4 is in agricultural use. Just west of Road 9-3/4 on Road 24 is a cattle feedlot. The land to the west is buffered and barriered by Interstate 25, and consists of property that has been significantly developed commercially to the south and the Barbour Ponds State Park Reclamation area to the northwest over the Interstate from the proposal project. The applicant has the option to purchase the entire tract on the northeast corner of the intersection of Road 24 and 1-25 with the exception of the Kahn Subdivision for which no future land use plans are pending. In summary, there are less than ten (10) existing residences within two miles of the proposed facility on the east side of Interstate 25. To the applicant's knowl- edge, there are no pending development plans in any adjacent properties. 9Z1249 INTRODUCTION ATTACHMENTS 9 71219 INFORMATION REGARDING THE PROPOSED PRERELEASE CENTER INTRODUCTION: The State of Colorado in recognizing the need to prepare inmates for their release back into society has solicited vendors to operate a highly structured, privatized, secure prerelease facility for 300 offenders that have an average of 90 days left to serve on their sentence. The Villa at Greeley, Inc . , has been selected by the Colorado Department of Corrections to build and operate such a facility. The Prerelease Center is a minimum security correctional facility that provides a wide range of programming intended to assist offenders in their transition back into the community. The intent of the prerelease program is to not only prepare the offender for release, but to also permit the receiving community to prepare for the offender ' s return. The program structure is geared toward the practical considerations and immediate problems of adjusting from prison life. The program consists of components such as employment, money management, housing, education, domestic violence, chemical dependency, and active referrals to agencies that can assist and supervise the offender in his transition back into his local community. The Prerelease Center ' s building structure and security procedures are analogous to a county jail setting. The facility has a perimeter secured by interlocking vestibules and security fencing. The facility consists of seven living units, each containing 46-50 offenders, and each staffed by a correctional officer on a 24 hour basis . There is a more highly secured 36 bed Special Management Unit to be utilized for short-term, limited detention purposes . Approximately 110 employees will provide the supervision and services required for the 24-hour operation of this facility. Medical and dental services are provided within the facility. A full size gymnasium is contained within the building for recreational purposes . Library services are provided within the facility, and a stocked canteen is made available for the population to buy personal hygiene items , etc. In summary, the Prerelease Center is a self contained program. Offenders are not allowed to work or to otherwise be out in the community for any reason. 9 M The following are responses to common questions regarding the operations of the proposed facility: Question # 1 : Probably the most common question is : "What kind of offenders will be placed in the proposed prerelease facility?" Every offender sentenced to the Colorado Department of Corrections (D.O.C. ) is first admitted to a Diagnostic Unit where a comprehensive evaluation in completed, and each offender ' s security level is determined. The D.O.C. has five facility security levels . A level 5 facility is maximum security, housing maximum security inmates . Level 4 is called a "Close" facility, level 3 is medium security, and a level 2 facility is called "minimum restricted" . Minimum restricted means that the facility must have a secured perimeter, but offender movement within the confines of the facility is not as restricted as with the higher security designations . The proposed prerelease center is a level 2 facility, which will serve only those offenders classified minimum restricted or below. The D.O.C. utilizes an objective classification rating process that emphasizes the assessment of public risk, the safety of staff and other inmates, and the security needs of the inmate. At any given time, approximately two-thirds of D.O.C . population is not eligible for prerelease, because they have not been classified minimum restricted or below. The factors that are weighted and applied to each inmate ' s case to determine the appropriate assignment for each inmate include: - Severity of the current conviction, with special consideration given to multiple convictions, and acts of violence. - Prior felony record, with specific attention addressed to any level of aggression involved in the past. - Escape history, and - Institutional management problems . The classification process is essentially concerned with two factors--will the inmate be a management problem within the institution, and is he/she an escape risk. Most significantly, the classification system ensures that it takes longer and makes it less likely for violent offenders to work their way through the system in order to become eligible for a level 2 facility. The prerelease center will serve only those violent offenders who have proven themselves to be neither a management problem nor an 9149 escape risk through a rigorous , community safety conscious classification procedure. Eighty-five to ninety percent of the prerelease population will be non-violent offenders who also must be classified as a minimum security risk. The most common offenses for which offenders are incarcerated are burglary and theft, followed by drug crimes, and these are the offenders who will comprise most of the prerelease population. Question # 2 : Will offenders from other jurisdictions be released in the Del Camino area upon completion of the prerelease program? The answer is no. All offenders will be transported by staff to their paroling destination, and only offenders with established parole destinations will be accepted into the program. No offender will be released into the community unless they are from this community. Question # 3 : Has the basic facility design been adequately reviewed in regard to acceptable security and operational procedures, as well as adherence to all applicable codes and standards? The answer is yes . Bley and Associates, Architects has considerable experience in the design and operations of correctional facilities . The Department of Corrections will be very involved in the pre-construction design phase to assure compliance in all areas . In their preliminary review of the facility, the Department of Corrections indicated that the building structure and operations exceeded their level of security expectations . Mr. Kip Kautzky, former Director of the Colorado Department of Corrections was involved in the conceptual design phase of the facility. Mr. Richard Green, construction design consultant, who was most recently involved with the Federal Correctional facilities being built in Florence, has agreed to review the detailed design documents prior to the project ' s bid phase. Mr. Paul Katsampas, a regional consultant on the design, construction, and operations of detention facilities, has also agreed to participate in the pre-design phases of this project. Lastly, the National Institute of Corrections will provide technical assistance to ensure that the project conforms to all facility, operations, security and safety standards as promulgated by the Commission on Accreditation. Question # 4 : What about the risk of escape; or problems with visitors? Police Chief John Michaels from Windsor, contacted four communities in Texas with preparole facilities, and spoke with each city ' s police chief . The preparole facilities had been in operation for three to five years, and up to 15, 000 prisoners had been cycled through the facilities . Chief Michaels was informed by each of the other chiefs that there had been no escapes from any of these facilities . Further, Chief Michaels was informed that none 9Z1249 49 of the communities had any increase in crime, had no concerns or problems with visitors of the inmates, nor any other problems associated with the prerelease facilities . Chief Michaels stated that he would be glad to further discuss the information he obtained with any interested Weld County officials . He can be reached by calling 686-7476 . Question # 5 : Will property values decline? Economist Ann Garrison from the University of Northern Colorado, researched the benefits and costs of a facility such as a preparole release center locating in a community. She cited a California study that showed that property values rose faster in cities with prisons than in cities without prisons . Another study of fourteen communities substantiated the finding that property values were not adversely affected by the presence of a correctional facility, and further, that crime rates in communities with correctional facilities tended to be lower than the rate of crime in otherwise comparable cities . Ms . Garrison' s report is attached to this application. 921249 PREPAROLE RELEASE CENTER PROGRAM ACTIVITIES SUMMARY Course Contact Component Hours Brief Employment 36 Resume is completed; job seeking and interviewing skills videotaped; mock interviews; Job Services liaison; individualized job referrals, and job verifications Family 30 Early childhood lecture series, family Relationships dynamics film series (Bradshaw) , readjustment issues Communication 36 Assertiveness, flexibility, social and Interpersonal skills, negotiating, "getting along" Skills in the free world Money Management 20 Budgeting, saving/checking accounts, obtaining credit, insurance, community resource referrals, tax information Responsibility 24 Assessment instrument--Case Management and Correctional Classification, specific criminogenic Expectations factors, self-responsibility, present legal and correctional status, guest speakers to outline parole /I . S .P. / Community Corrections expectations, mock parole hearings Chemical 36 Educational lecture and film series Dependency on disease concept of chemical dependency and the recovery process Relapse 36 Recognizing prerelapse symptoms, com- Prevention pulsive behaviors, types of recovery, daily planning, staying sober, community referrals Education 54 Basic literacy, advanced education, and English as a second language courses . 9Z1243 (continued) Course Contact Component Hours Brief Anger and Stress 30 Sources, direction, and emotional Management control and expression, journal writing, self-esteem, parent/child anger; relaxation techniques, self- discipline and emotional control, film and lecture series Health and 30 AIDS Series, nutrition, personal Wellness hygiene, exercise for life Domestic 36 Specialized component directed at Violence perpetrators of domestic violence; patterned after licensed AMENDS programs Leisure Time 60 Staff guided lectures, films, and Activities activities, assisted by UNC graduate students in Health, P.E. , and Recreation Department Cognitive 70 Ross model, series on changing percep- Restructuring tions and thought processes, leading to productive decision making CPR and First 20 CPR and First Aid certification courses Aid taught by qualified instructors Blood Donor 6 On a voluntary basis, offenders are Program given credit for two contact hours for donating blood once each month with on-site services provided by the American Red Cross AA/NA/Bible 90 Nightly support groups for chemical Study/Big Book dependency, religion, and other special- Study ized interest and needs 9 '1!4?:49 (continued) Course Contact Component Hours Brief Special Needs 90 Recognizes enhanced programmatic Offender requirements of offenders unable to participate in mainstream program because of academic, language skills, physical or mental health limitations . Emphasizes continuum of enhanced services upon release including community corrections residential placements facilitated by Division of Criminal Justice Individual 3 Final review of housing, employment Release Planning and correctional supervision upon release; case specific referrals and appointments verified; discharge summary completed; appointment established with parole officer, and staff transport details finalized. Total Course Component Contact Hours 707 9Z1249 49 A PRIVATE PREPAROLE PRISON IN THE LOCAL ECONOMY PREPARED FOR GREELEY CITY COUNCIL Prepared by Ann J. Garrison Economics Department College of Arts and Sciences University of Northern Colorado RESEARCH ON LOCAL ECONOMY FUNDED BY EDAP AND UNC RESEARCH CORPORATION September 7, 1992 • 931249 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 . In 1987 state prisons in the United States were operating at 105 to 120 percent of capacity. In 1990 Colorado' s state prisons were operating at 115 percent of capacity. 2 . Between 1971 and 1985 the Consumer Price Index for the county rose 165 . 68 percent. During the same time operating costs of our correctional institutions rose 470 percent. 3 . 1990 Colorado data NATIONAL NUMBER RANKING Crime total 199 , 434 23 Crime rate per 100, 000 people 6, 053 . 7 12 Number of adults under the state correctional system 39 , 610 27 State prison population 7, 018 28 State and local government spending on the police protection $370, 581, 000 18 Per capita state and local government spending on the correctional system $112 .49 9 State and local government employment in corrections 5, 431 25 4 . In 1991 the crime total in Colorado had risen to 204, 531 . 5 . Colorado ' s decentralized tax system, excessive burden of local tax systems, reductions in Federal Government financial aid, and threats from groups that want to limit state and local governments ' ability to generate new tax dollars adds to the bottlenecks in the supply of correction facilities and other public goods . 6 . In 1991 there were private correctional institutions that a capacity to house 15, 476 people, and by the spring of 1992 the capacity had increased to 19,513 . There were 60 facilities under contract in early 1992 . 7 . The average savings realized from private prisons depends on whether private enterprise takes over an existing prison, designs and operates a prison, or designs, builds and operates the prison. If the private firm takes over an existing prison, the saving average 10 percent. If the prison is designed and operated by private enterprise, the savings are 15 percent. When the prison is designed, built, and operated with the private sector, the savings average 20 percent. 8 . The normal cost of building a public prison is $82, 000 a bed; the preparole prison would have a construction cost of $14, 000 a bed. With capital construction costs included the 971.249 daily average prisoner cost in public prisons is $65 a day. The cost in the prerelease prison would be between $44 and $48 . 9 . The prerelease prison would provide 6 hours of holistic education each day. This education would provide information and skills to access resources in the communities where the prisoners will live when they are released. The education will also make it easier to access employment. 10 . The $4 . 8 million in construction, the 100 employees with an annual payroll of $1 . 4 million, and the $4 . 818 million in fees received by the establishment would change the employment, output (gross sales ) , value added, and income in Weld County. These increases are given below. TABLE III POSITIVE ECONOMIC IMPACT IMPACT OF IMPACT OF CONSTRUCTION OPERATION EMPLOYMENT 101 JOBS 138 JOBS OUTPUT $6 . 22 MILLION $9 .34 MILLION VALUE ADDED 6 . 84 MILLION 6 . 41 MILLION INCOME 6 . 71 MILLION 6 . 24 MILLION 931249 A PRIVATE PREPAROLE PRISON IN THE LOCAL ECONOMY INTRODUCTION .> Every transaction in our economy involves economic forces from both the supply and demand side of the market. In the past it was believed that the government was best at supplying those goods and services that affected as jointly and equally and that the private sector should provide the rest of the goods and services. Prisons, like defense, were something that affected us jointly and equally. As a result we expected the government to supply prisons; and jails. We looked at prisons' functions to include custody,. coercion, and correction of prisoners who were classified as needing maximum security prisons or customary security. As long as the prisoners were incarcerated, the prisons/jails prevented crime outside the prisons. They have not deterred other people from committing crime, and they have not reformed the inmates or prevented them from further crimes when they were freed. Economic conditions have changed. These changes require us to ask a question. How can we use our limited resources in a more efficient manner so that the correctional system can meet the demands placed on it? The answer that emerged is a multiform system that allows flexibility and ends the government' s monopoly. It would house and treat prisoners in both the old and new way. Charles Logan in his book, Private Prisons: Cons and Pros, summarizes the problem and the solution. "Faced with overflowing and aging facilities, with court orders demanding immediate reforms, with already straining budgets and voter rejections of prison construction bond issues, and with mandatory sentence laws, toughening public attitudes, and "wars on drugs" that promise even larger prison populations, government authorities are ready to consider many different options to help relieve the strain. Some of the options include: emergency early release provisions; policies of selective incarceration and release; community corrections; home confinement with electronic monitoring ; intensive supervision probation; increased use of fines and contracting with other jurisdictions for jail and prison space. All of these options are aimed at either decreasing the prison population or using existing prison capacity more efficiently. Another option is to contract with the private sector to finance construct, own, and operate prisons and jails. This option does not conflict with any of the above options; rather, it supplements them" (Charles H. Logan, 1990) . ECONOMIC FACTORS AFFECTING THE SUPPLY AND DEMAND OF PRISONS Between 1978 and 1986 in the United States there was a 68 percent increase in the daily average of people in prisons and jails. By 9i49 1986 it was the norm for state prisons to have 6 percent more prisoners than space for prisoners (Douglas C. McDonald, 1990) . In 1987 state prisons were operating at 105 to 120 percent of capacity (Charles H. Logan, 1990) . Between 1971 and 1985 the nation' s Consumer Price Index went up 165. 68 percent. During the same time operating costs of our correctional institutions rose 470 percent (Douglas C. McDonald, 1990) . In addition to rapidly rising operating costs, our nation faced the need for more prisons and less ability to fund them. The Federal Government 's Fiscal Year 1992 Unified Budget shows that 517 billion was appropriated for law enforcement. This amount would understate the amount of Federal Government funds going into law enforcement and correctional ,institutions. It does not include the funds transferred to lower levels of government for their use or "off-budget" items that would be in this particular area. The Federal Government 's transfer of funds to lower government is decreasing at the time when the operating costs of correctional facilities are rising faster than the general price level, and it is becoming harder for state and local governments' income inelastic tax systems to generate the revenue needed for the competing uses of this revenue. CRIME AND CORRECTIONS IN COLORADO Table I presents statistics dealing with crime and law enforcement in Colorado in 1990. The total crime in Colorado in 1990 was 199, 434, and the crime rate per 100, 000 people was 6, 053. 7. We ranked number 23 in the nation in the number of crimes and number 12 in rate of crime. There were 182, 106 property crimes. The state and local governments spent 5370, 581, 000 on police protection in 1990. This amount of spending gave us a national ranking of 18. If the spending is per capita spending our rank was nine with 5112. 49 spent per capita. The national average was 899. 09. There were 5, 431 people (FTE) employed by state and local government in corrections, and the state prisons were operating at 115 percent of capacity. There were 39, 610 adults under state corrections supervision, and 7, 018 state prisoners. TABLE I CRIME AND LAW ENFORCEMENT IN COLORADO IN 1990 NUMBER IN PERCENT OF RANK IN THE COLORADO U. S. TOTAL NATION Total Crimes 199, 434 1. 38% 23 Crime Rate Per 100, 000 people 6, 053. 7 NA 12 Violent Crimes 17, 328 0. 95 24 9Z1249 TABLE I CONTINUED CRII:E AND LAW ENFORCEMENT IN COLORADO IN 1990 NUMBER IN PERCENT OF RANK IN THE COLORADO U. S. TOTAL NATION Murders 138 0. 59 30 Rapes 1, 521 1. 48 21 Robberies 2, 985 0. 47 28 Aggravated Asenults 12, 684 1. 20 22 Property Crimes 182, 106 1. 44 23 Burglaries 39, 822 1. 30 25 Larceny & Theft 128, 172 1. 61 22 Motor Vehicle Theft 14, 112 0. 86 25 Adults Under State Correctional Super- vision 39, 610 1. 01 27 State Prisoners 7, 018 0. 99 28 Prisoners in State Prisons as a Percent of Capacity 115% NA 18 Prisoners Under Sentence of Death 3 0. 13 31 Adults Under State Parole Supervision in 1989 1, 799 0. 41 32 Adults on State Probation in 1989 26, 378 1. 07 26 FTE State & Local Corrections Employment 5, 431 1. 08 25 State and Local Expenditures for Protection $370, 581, 000 1. 50 18 Per capita ex- penditures on State and Local Corrections $112. 49 NA 9 SOURCE:Morgan Quitno Corporation, State Ranking 1992; A Statistical View of the 50 United States, 1992. In 1991 in Colorado the following took place: One Index Crime Every 2. 6 minutes One Violent Crime Every 27. 9 minutes One Rape every 5 hours and 27 minutes One Robbery every 2 hours and 25 minutes One Aggravated Assault every 39 minutes One Property Crime every 2. 8 minutes One Burglary every 13. 4 minutes One Larceny-Theft every 4 minutes 9,31249 One Motor Vehicle Theft every 36. 5 minutes (Colorado Bureau of Investigation Crime Information Center, 1992) . There were notable increases in the number and rates of crime in Colorado in 1991. Table II shows the percent changes in the number and rates of crime in the state in 1991. The rate are per 100, 000 inhabitants. TABLE II PERCENT CHANGES IN INDEX CRIMES IN COLORADO 1990-1991 TYPE OF PERCENT CHANGES IN CRIME NUMBER RATE PER 100, 000 Criminal homicide 42. 8% 38. 1% Forcible rape 4. 7 2. 2 Robbery 21. 7 18. 8 Assault 6. 1 3. 5 Burglary -1. 5 -3. 9 Larceny-theft 3. 9 1. 3 Auto theft 2. 0 -0. 5 TOTAL 3. 1 0. 6 SOURCE:CRIME IN COLORADO ANNUAL REPORT, Colorado Bureau of ' Investigation Crime Information Center, 1992. There were 204, 531 crimes reported in the state in 1991. There were 197 murders, 1, 589 rapes, 3, 630 robberies, and 13, 443 aggravated assaults. These crimes were crimes against people. Crimes against property included 39, 031 burglaries, 132, 264 larceny-thefts, and 14, 377 motor vehicle thefts. Larceny-thefts made up 64. 7 percent of the index crimes in Colorado in 1991. The 1991 numbers do not include manslaughter by negligence and simply assault (Colorado Bureau of Investigation Crime Information Center, 1992) . While the number of crimes in the nation and state rose briskly through last year, prison populations are expected to rise more rapidly from the turn of the century through the year 2020 (Douglas C. Mcdonald, 1990) . This projection is based on demographic changes only. Structural changes in the national economy and state economy will have an impact on the number of crimes and the rate of crime per 100, 000 people. These structural changes will increase the amount of crime. In 1980 one out of every 362 adults was in prison or jail, in 1991 one out of every 156 was, and in 2000 one out of every 99 921249 adults is expected to be incarcerated (Dennis Cauchon, 1992) . Colorado's revenue system cannot generate enough money to provide the public anc4 merit goods that people expect. It is undesirable for the state to allocate a larger and larger portion of the tax revenue it has collected toward the correctional system, because of other increasing needs. In Fiscal Year 1991 Colorado was collecting $937 in per capita taxes. The amount of per capita income taxes was $432. 69, and this gave the state the national rank of 17. Only 16 other states had higher per capita personal income taxes. The per capita state corporate income tax revenue was $34. 75 with a national rank of 42. Per capita state sales taxes in the same year were $250. This amount gave us a national ranking of 40 (Morgan Quitno Corporation, 1992) . A better measure of the state's tax burden on the tax payer and a better measure of its tax effort is to look at state tax collections per 51, 000 per fiscal year. In Fiscal Year 1989, Colorado had a national ranking of 48 and collected 553. 43 of taxes per 81, 000. Personal income taxes collected per $1, 000 of personal income came to $23. 42, and our rank in the nation was 23. The state' s general retail sales tax collections per $1, 000 of personal income was 813. 82. The state's rank was 44 (Colorado Public Expenditure Council, 1991 ) . These numbers show that the tax burden of Colorado 's tax system is relatively light. This minimal burden is the result of the state decentralizing many of the functions that states frequently provide. The shifting of these functions on the local governments has increased the tax burden of local governments' tax system (local governments' tax systems are more inelastic and burdensome than the states' ) . Our local governments' tax systems collected $55. 85 per $1, 000 of personal income in Fiscal Year 1989. Only four other states had local tax systems that were collecting more out of $1, 000 of personal income (Colorado Public Expenditure Council, 1991 ) . The decentralized tax system, excessive burden of local tax systems, and threats from groups that want to limit governments' ability to generate new tax dollars adds to the bottlenecks in the supply of correctional facilities, as well as other needed public goods. Privatization will be part of the future. Contrary to the conventional wisdom that most people share, the average person is not wanting to "lock 'em all up and throw away the key" as the generic solution to the crime problem. When people who have been surveyed have not been provided sufficient information about the offender, they suggested tough sentencing recommendations. When additional information was provided, the people had different recommendations. What was considered to be a soft sentence was a sentence to straight probation. The respondents that were generally in favor of tough sentencing were 91.1249 the ones that had reported sometime of household victimization within the past 12 months (Mary J. Mande, Ph. D. and Kim English, M. A. , 1989) . PRIVATE PRISONS There are specific benefits that are provided by private prisons. Charles Logan in Private Prisons lists nine different factors that are generally considered. Paraphrasing of his part of his text follows: "Propriety : private prisons are more responsive to changes in demand; contractual wardens are more interested to govern inmates fairly to lower costs and help get the contract renewed; the government • regulation of these prisons adds an ,independent review of the correctional decisions and actions, which improves due process; since private and public wardens are subject to the same constitutional laws, protecting due process. Costs: the prisons are built and operated more efficiently and at less cost; contracting fees are typically indexed to the Consumer Price Index, which prevents the hyperinflating of costs we now have; true costs can be determined, compared and adjusted. Quality : contracting promotes creativity ; by providing something that public prisons can be compared to will increase the quality in these prisons. Quantity : private prisons help to limit the size of government; build prisons faster than the government can; responds more quickly to changes in needs. Flexibility : contracting allows more flexibility in terms of expansion, contraction, and termination; reduces slow decision making by entrenched bureaucrats ; allows efficient personnel management. Security : increased staff training and professionalism may enhance public safety; fewer strikes and labor disputes. Liability : higher quality performance and through insurance, indemnification. Accountability : market mechanisms added to those of the political process increase accountability ; the visibility of private prisons makes them more accountable than the historically ignored (until recently) public prisons; contracting broadens the interest, involvement and participation in corrections by people in the private sector. 331249 Corruption : managers have a vested interest in the reputation and financial success of the institute. Dependence : private prisons increase the number of suppliers within the private sector; they are less vulnerable to the impact of strikes, slowdowns, and bad management in the firms that supply them with needed supplies" (Charles H. Logan, 1990) . The current incremental approach to privatization of prisons began in the 1980s after entrepreneurs became able to access the capital market , public correctional personnel with experience were willing to move into the private prison business, enabling laws were passed, and governments were willing to privatize prisons (Charles W. Thomas, and Charles H. Logan, 1991 ) . They also could not afford to continue trying to do business as they had in the past. The average savings realized from private prisons depends on whether private enterprise takes over an existing prison, designs and operates a prison, or designs, builds and operates the prison. If the private firm takes over an existing prison, the savings average 10 percent. If the prison is designed and operated by private enterprise, the savings are 15 percent. When the prison is designed, built, and operated within the private sector, the savings average 20 percent (Dennis Cauchon, 1992) . California is a prime example of a state that tried to build enough prisons to house the exploding prison population and lessen crime. Neither result occurred. Even though the state spent S6. 2 billion during the 1980s, they were operating at 175 percent of capacity in 1989. About 80 percent of the released prison population returned through the prisons' revolving doors. A large percent of the people returned (47 percent, or 39, 976 people) in 1989 had not been convicted of new crimes but had violated their parole conditions. One of the reasons for the high recidivism was the small percent of prisoners who went through a pre-release program. In 1988 around 4 percent of the men in prison were involved in a pre-release program ( Anthony Costell, Rick Garnett and Vincent Shiraldi, 1991 ) . During the last few years there have been some trends established. One of these trends is that private prisons appear to be filling a niche when they serve special population needs. Examples of groups with special needs includes pre-release facilities, return-to-custody facilities and female only prisons. This trend surfaced because states considered it to be to the states' advantage to turn over prisons to private enterprise for these groups rather than the general prison population. California, Texas, Kentucky, and New Mexico were the first states to privatize prisons for these populations (Alexis M. Durham III, Ph. D. 1991) . 921249 In 1991 there were private correctional institutions that had a capacity to house 15, 476 people and did house 13, 348 people. In the spring of 1992, the capacity had increased to 19, 513 and the prisoners living in these facilities numbered 17, 317. There were 60 facilities under contract early in 1992 (Charles W. Thomas and Suzanne L. Foard, 1992) . In 1992 the International Association of Residential and Community Alternatives issued a policy statement dealing with incarcerated people. This statement places a heavy emphasis on putting in place programs that are directly related to criminal activity. These conditions would include drug addition, unemployment, homelessness, poverty, and illiteracy ( International Association of Residential and Community Alternatives, 1992) . The customary, ordinary manner of dealing with incarcerated prisoners provided an unusual vocational education (they learned how to be more efficient, productive criminals) to the prisoners and left their "old personal baggage" in place when they were released. Albert Einstein once said, "The world is a product of our thinking. " If we do not like the product of correctional system, we need to change our way of thinking. "The very difficult set of social policy issues raised by the privatization debate ought to be resolved by moving in whichever direction has a reasonable likelihood of yielding the more efficient and effective means of improving the quality of correctional services. Moving in such a direction carries with it the promise of better protecting the rights of confined persons in the immediate future and the broader public interest in the longer term. To favor traditional means of providing correctional services merely as a consequence of habit or from a preference for symbolic representations of the power of the State is just as absurd as to favor privatization merely because of some abstract value one might impute to profit motives. The option to be favored is the option that proves its ability to get done the job at hand. That option is not necessarily the option which wear a department of corrections badge on its state-issued shirt" (Charles W. Thomas and Linda S. Calvert Hanson, 1989) . A PRIVATE PRERELEASE PRISON IN THE GREELEY/WELD COUNTY ECONOMIES The proposed private prerelease prison would house prisoners for a 90-day period before their release. The minimum security prisoners would be in the part of their sentences when the threat of escape is the smallest. An escape attempt or escape would result in the prisoner's return to prison. The additional costs to the prisoner would outweigh any anticipated additional benefits of an escape. The fenced facility would have 400 beds and would average around an average daily population of 300. The prisoners would receive six hours of education each day. The number of hours exceeds the number of hours in "regular prison education" by 5. 5 hours. This education would be holistic in nature. It would include 36 hours 9;31249 of education in the area of employment, 30 hours dealing with family relations, 20 hours of money management, 30 hours of education dealing with anger and stress, and 36 hours dealing with community resources. The purpose of the hours of education is to provide them with links in the towns where they will go and the resources in these towns (John Coppom, 1992) . This type of education is a step toward their being able to integrate themselves into the general population. The economic impact of the facility would be in felt through the construction, operation, and maintenance of the facility. The impact of the ;construction would be short run, while the economic impact of the operation and maintenance of the facility would be long run. The construction costs would be a minimum of $4. 8 million, S1 million a year would be spent on operation of the facility, and maintenance down the road would be $20, 000 a year. The facility would hire a minimum of 100 full-time workers, and the annual payroll would be 81. 4 million. These workers would receive an attractive fringe-benefit package that compares most favorably to packages provided in the private sector. The pay would average annual monetary pay would vary from $12, 000 up to $60, 000. The annual payroll would be 51. 4 million. Wages plus fringe benefits equals the value of total compensation workers are paid. At the end of March, benefits in private industry were 32. 3 percent of the total compensation given blue- collar workers, 26. 6 percent for white-collar jobs, and 24. 3 percent for service occupations (United States Department of Labor, 1992) . The workers' total compensation would be positively affected by the value of the fringe benefits. The short and long run effects on the local economy would include higher employment, output, value added, and personal income. The numbers that follow are derived from the most recent IMPLAN input-output table for Weld County. There is no input-output table for Greeley or other urbanized areas. . This table divides the county's economy into over 500 industries and can be used to show a variety of factors related to the supply and demand of these industries' products. Construction activity would generate 72 jobs in the construction industry, 20 jobs in industries that supply the construction industry, and 9 jobs because of additions to the population. The population expands in counties with increased economic activity, regardless of the source of the activity. If the contractors are local, the 72 jobs would be within the county. If the contractors are from out of the county, some of the 72 workers will be from Weld County and some from other counties. Most of the 20 jobs in industries that supply the firms involved in the construction will be within the county. The 72 jobs created, as well as the 20 jobs, would not be permanent unless the economy' s expansion continued. 921249 The output, or gross sales, in Weld County would rise $6. 22 million as a result of the direct, indirect, and induced impacts of the building project. The direct effect is the impact on the particular industry being considered, the indirect effect takes into account the impact on all of the suppliers of the industry, and the induced impact adds the changes that would occur because of a population change. Value added is the different between the costs that a firm has in purchasing its inputs used in its business and the revenue that it gets when its output is sold. The construction of the prison would add $6. 84 million in value added from the direct, indirect, and induced effects of the project. The increase in value added exceeds the increase in gross sales because the building, once completed, is used rather than sold. When the direct, indirect, and induced effects of the construction project are included, the income in Weld County would go up $6. 71 million. The operation of the preparole prison would also change employment, output, value added, and income. These changes would be long run, not short run. Employment at the prison would increase the county 's employment by a minimum of 100. Businesses that supply the prison would increase their employees by nine, and the population would grow by 29. The total change in employment would be a minimum of 138. Gross sales would rise in Weld County by S9. 34 million, and value added would go up by $6. 41 million. Both of these changes include the effects of the workers spending their pay, the prison buying supplies from a variety of firms, and the increased population spending. At the same time the income of the people of the county would rise $6. 24 million dollar. The business would receive a minimum of $4. 818 million in fees for its services. As the fees that the prison receives in payment for the prisoners rises, the economic impact on employment, output, value added, and income would rise. The industry is not a boom-bust industry, but rather an industry that is quite stable. As a result of its stability, the economic impact of it on Greeley and Weld County will be stable too. The numbers given for the change in employment, output, value added, and income would be larger, if there are smaller leaks out of the spending stream than are included in the input-output table. Or, the total impact would be smaller if the leaks are larger in the economy than built into the table. People in Greeley and Weld County, as taxpayers in the state, would also not be funding additional prison space or the operation of prison space at as high a cost as found with public prisons. The normal cost of building a public prison is 582, 000 9 .1.249 a bed; the preparole prison would have a consturction cost of $14, 000 a bed. A new public prison requires 840 to S50 million for construction. When capital construction costs are included in the daily average prisoner cost, the public prisons cost $65 a day. The cost in this prison would be $44 to $48 (John Coppom, 1992) . The psychic costs of the prison include the fear of prisoners escaping. At Canon City's preparole facility, there is no fence and there have been five prisoners who have walked away since 1987. The Villa in Greeley has housed more than 1, 800 people in 3. 5 years with ten walk sways ( John Coppom, 1992) . The Villa has no fence; but the preparole prison would. Good management, minimum security prisoners, and prisoners with a lot to lose with an escape lowers the probability of escape and the psychic costs that might be present. 921249 BIBLIOGRAPHY Coppom, John, Interview; September 3, 1992 , Greeley, Colorado . Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations, Significant Features of Fiscal Federalism, Vol 1 , February, 1992; Washington, D.C. Costillo, Anthony, Garnett, Rick, and Shiraldi, Vincent, "Parole Violators in California: A Waste of Money, A Waste of Time; " The International Association of Residential and Community Alternatives, Vol. V, No. 1; March/April, 1992 . Colorado Public Expenditure Council, How Colorado Compares - State and Local Taxes, 1991 Edition, Denver, Co. ; 1991 . Department of Public Safety, Colorado Bureau of Investigation Crime Information Center, 1991 Crime in Colorado, Denver, Co. ; 1992 . Hanson, Linda, "The Privatization of Corrections Movement: A Decade of Change; "Journal of Contemporary Justice; March, 1991 . Hawkins , Gordon, The Prison Policy and Practice, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Il. ; 1976 . The International Association of Residential and Community Alternatives, "Social Policy on Mass Imprisonment, " International Association of Residential and Community Alternatives Journal, Vol . V, No. 1; March/April, 1992 . Kiplinger Washington Letter, Washington, D.C. ; August 28, 1992 . Logan, Charles H. , Private Prisons : Cons and Pros , Oxford University Press, New York, N.Y. ; 1990 . Mande, Mary J. , Ph.D. , and English, Kim, M.A. The Effect of Public Opinion on Correctional Policy: A Comparison of Opinions and Practice, " Colorado Department of Public Safey, Division of Criminal Justice; June 1989 . McDonald, Douglas C. , Editor, Private Prisons and the Public Interest, Rutgers University Press , New Brunswick; 1990 . Morgan Quitno Corporation, State Rankings , 1992 A Statistical View of the 50 United States, Lawrence, Kansas; 1992 . Ryan, Mick and Ward, Tony, Privatization and the Penal System, St. Martins Press; New York, 1989 . Thomas, Charles W. , "Correctional Facility Privatization - How it Redefines Legal Rights of Prisoners, " The Privatization Review, Vol . 6, No. 1; Winter, 1991 . 931249 "Prisoners ' Rights and Correctional Privatization, " Business and Professional Ethics Journal, " Vol. . 10, No. 1; Spring, 1991 . "Resolving the Problem of Qualified Immunity for Private Defendants in Section 1983 and Bivens Damage Suits, " Paper presented at the Southern Conference on Corrections, Tallahassee, Fl . ; February 24, 1992 . Thomas, Charles W. and Hanson, Linda Calvert, "The Emergence of the Private Corrections Industry, " Partnership Focus, W1.22, No. 2; March, 1991 . "The Implications of 421 U. S .C. Vs 1983 For the Privatization of Prisons, " Florida State University Law Review, Vol . 16, No.4; Spring, 1989 . Thomas, Charles W. and Foard, Suzanna L. , "Private Adult Correctional Facility Census, " Private Corrections Project, Center for Studies in Criminology and Law, University of Florida, ; June 30, 1992 . Thomas, Charles W. and Logan, Charles H. , "The Development, Present Status, and Future of Correctional Privatization in America, " Paper presented at the American Legislative Exchange Council, Miami, Fl. ; March 23, 1991 . "The Privatization of American Corrections - A Selected Bibliography, " University of Florida, March 1992 . United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics , "News; " June 29 , 1992 . 91249 ADDENDUM TO A PRIVATE PREPAROLE PRISON IN THE LOCAL ECONOMY Prepared for The Windsor Town Board Windsor, Colorado Research on the local economy funded by Weld/Greeley Economic Development Action Partnership and The UNC Research Corporation Prepared by Ann J. Garrison Economics Department University of Northern Colorado March 14, 1993 1:9Jito INTRODUCTION The private sector has always been involved with correctional facilities (jails, detention centers, and prisons) in the United States . Historically the involvement centered on providing specialized services and housing juveniles . The move toward privatization of public goods and services started with the published results of President Reagan's Commission on Privatization. The net results of this Commission were that the private sector is able to provide services at a cost below that attributable to government agencies and at a quality level equal to or better than that of agencies (President' s Commission on Privatization; Privatization: Toward More Effective Government, 1988) . Before the privatization movement could begin in the arena of correctional facilities there had to money for capital construction and start up of the facilities, enabling laws, and experienced correctional administrators . The first private correctional facility occurred in 1983 in Nashville. In 1992 there were contracted facilities in Alabama, California, Florida, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Colorado, New York, and Washington. BENEFITS AND COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH RESOURCE USE Every use of scarce resources involves benefits and costs . The economic analysis of resource use for private or public gain should be based on both monetary and nonmonetary benefits and costs . The monetary benefits involved with the development of any private business includes the total income, employment, and value added that result to the business and area where the business is located. The costs surrounding the same business would include foregone opportunities because resources were used for the development and operation of this business rather than alternative businesses . If the expected benefits received from the enterprise exceed the expected costs of the business, the use of the scarce resources would be considered advantageous . Lower per diem costs of private correctional facilities yield important cost savings and the quality of service of these institutions have been shown to be equal or greater than public institutions . The lower costs and the high quality of service represent benefits to residents beyond the county. Prison quality indexes are used to measure the quality of the correctional institution. Since the national accreditation standards of the American Correctional Association can be applied to both public and private prisons, they allow for a comparison between both public and private prisons and different types of private prisons . They indexes are arrived at by standard surveys of inmates, people who work at the prison facilities, and review of prison data. With the quality index used, a score of 100 would be perfect. New Mexico' s private prison had the highest ranking in the state; the Cleveland Texas Pre-release facility received a score of 97 .5 percent; the Venus Texas Pre-release Center received 9.-1249 a score of 99 . 7 percent, and the Bridgeport Texas Pre-release Center had 98 .43 percent for a score (Bowman, Hakim, Seidenstat, 1993) . The expected benefits of the proposed private preparole prison would include the following: IMPACT OF OPERATION Employment 138 jobs Output $9 . 34 Million Value Added 6 .41 Million Income 6 . 24 Million These monetary benefits would occur within Weld County (Garrison, 1992) . A study released in 1985 by the California Senate Office of Research found that property values rose faster in cities with prisons than in cities without prisons . The study also showed that homes near prisons often sold for high prices . " In the Corona-Norco area, homes in a new development across the street from the California Rehabilitation Center sell for between $216, 000 and $227 , 990 . In Folsom, new homes located within one-half mile of the new prison sell for between $160, 000 and $320, 000 (Private Corrections Project; Center for Studies in Criminology and Law; Florida, 1992 ) . In 1987 two researchers, Abrams and Lyons, made a comparison between seven cities with prisons and seven cities without institutions of correction. This study showed that property values and crime rates were not adversely affected by the presences of prisons . In six of the seven cities with correctional facilities property values were not adversely affected; in the one city the decrease was due to poor public relations (Private Corrections Project; Center for Studies in Criminology and Law; Florida, 1992 ) . Abrams and Lyons also showed that six out of the seven communities did not have higher crime rates because of the presence of prisons, and the 1985 California study showed that there were lower crime rates in cities with correctional institutions (Private Corrections Project; Center for Studies in Criminology and Law; Florida, 1992) . The one city in the study done by Abrams and Lyons that had higher a crime rate had this higher rate as a result of another land-use-planning decision. A urban shopping center created the increased rate. Data of the California Department of Corrections also shows that inmate families do not flock to the cities where family members are in prison. The few families that did move to prison cities were not noticeably different from other residents . Since the California data deals with prisons containing prisoners with relatively long sentences, there would be less incentive for families of prisoners in a preparole facility to move to the city where the facility is 941249. located. In addition, the incentive would be further reduced by the prisoner being returned to the county where the crime was committed. If property values fell, if crime rates rose, or if welfare costs rose due to migrating families of prisoners, the results would be higher costs due to the operation of the prison, or in this case private preparole prison. If property values rise, or if crime rates fall, the changes in the variables would be benefits . In January, 1993 Talmey-Drake released the results of a survey dealing with crime and prisons . The survey showed that 45 percent of the people wanted to reduce prison sentences for non-violent crimes (particularly drug use) rather than build more new prisons . The publication said, "While the 45% to 40% support for sentence reduction is not exactly a thumping mandate for change, the finding is significant nonetheless, because for the past decade the war on crime and drugs has been treated as a motherhood issue in the Legislature. The fact that so many Coloradans are disinclined to favor further escalation suggests a sea change is occurring" (Talemy-Drake Report, 1993) . CRIME IN THE AREA IN 1990 In Weld County (and in Windsor) we have specialized in assaulting each other and stealing from each other. What most people fail to recognize is that we live every day with people who are criminals . Most people who committed crimes face a very small probability of being caught, prosecuted, and incarcerated for a crime committed in Weld County, or any other location of the country. In 1990 the Colorado Bureau of Investigation showed that there were 8, 625 index crimes in Weld County. Out of this 8, 625 crimes, 2, 015 were cleared. Windsor had 215 index crimes, and 39 were cleared (1990 Colorado Bureau of Investigation) . If the crime was not cleared, the criminal remained with us. National studies done by economists show that the arrest ratio is the fraction of crimes that lead to an arrest. This ratio is believed to be about 0 . 16 (O' Sullivan, 1993) . Only about nine out of 100 felony arrests generate a prison sentence (O' Sullivan, 1993) . Economic studies have shown that crime victimization rates are dependent on income, place of residence, and race. Victimization rates are generally higher for the poor, racial minorities, and the residents of central cities . Investments in education and job training reduce the amount of crime (O' Sullivan, 1993) . Many property crimes are a result of drug addition. Our approach to drug addition has been to make the drugs illegal . This supply- side approach generates a trade-off between drug control and 9w;12 49 ' property crime. Drug enforcement policies reduce drug consumption, but they increase the total amount spent on drugs by the addict. This increased expenditure in turn generates more property crime. The increased property crime increases the need for more expenditures on police, jails, and prisons . Demand-side policies do not have the same trade-off . PRISONS AND THE LOCAL EMPLOYMENT BASE Any type of correctional facility is a labor intensive, clean, stable and recession proof business . Census data ( 1980 and 1990) for Bay County Florida, Hamilton County Tennessee, Santa Fe County, New Mexico, Houston, Texas, Laredo, Texas, and Levenworth, Kansas showed no apparent negative impact on population growth or the growth of the employment base. Some of the areas grew faster than others . Long run economic growth is a function of asset management (Mark Drabenstott, 1993) . Areas with good infrastructure, an educated population, a high labor force participation rate, and low taxes combined with good government services will have the best chance for long run economic growth. Two ways to expand an economy include increasing exports to bring new income and money into the local economy and decreasing imports to stop the leakage of income and money out of the local economy. A private preparole prison would be an export business . All the revenue that would be generated would originate outside of the county' s economy. 92;1249 • BIBLIOGRAPHY Bowman, Gary, Hakim, Simon, and Seidenstat, Paul, Editors; Privatizing Correctional Institutions, Transaction Publishers; New Brunswick, New Jersey, 1993 . Colorado Bureau of Investigation, 1990 Index Crimes, Denver, Colorado, 1991 . Drabenstott, Mark, "The District's Long-Term Growth Prospects, " Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Economic Review, First Quarter, 1993 . Garrison, Ann, "A Private Preparole Prison in the Local Economy, " Greeley, Colorado, 1992 . O'Sullivan, Arthur; Urban Economics, Richard D. Irwin Publishers, Homewood, Ill, 1993 . President' s Commission on Privatization, "Privatization: Toward More Effective Government, " Washington, D.C. 1988 . U. S . Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, 1980 and 1990 Census Data, Washington, D.C. Private Corrections Project, Center for Studies in Criminology and Law, University of Florida; "Efforts to Encourage Community Receptiveness, " Gainesville, Florida, 1992 . Talmey-Drake Report, Vol 2, No. 1; Boulder, Colorado, January, 1993. 901249 1 s.,4) 2 vi a © c� yo U cep O4cte. ** Ti �? i.r w / J w © y ' do a o a cc) q e O 4 O w � ,� C4 O . • ®ip i ap c w c g O L", E a Pe W Jib *4 "3/4 a ^ o a d o0 ,..., cu . . . O , y S U4 �, MOo O `r(' �' * ti w o a., x V N.P0 cu IsCi �a.S * a � c c' 0 git O �r i7 +-' o W OUC car �7 cn � O oA V) O O, O. N ,O ,n O of m M 1O N C tr.; N en b .0 .y. L� C4 lg 00 BR * BR IE ER DR A' � � tP � H' B' l�1 to .-. O� oo N 00 N oo •-• N M 7 ,D V' N ? Ned. U 00 V a M <t N 1� en en O ^ O -, 00 �. �. V1 V' M '+ M ON --� P h N N ...• •Co U 0 M C.."M z F ; €y w p 8 co e t.Z O n U 44 b O v oa IL E L E w �1 (a d �^ C i� 'gyp v a� z O O o `m G 4.� ,.. P, w •c .0 U y A V •^ y AQpJ p a pm a' C7 5 v CO ill a E} Ww 0 a cn e 1 a ^" _ •y . w a d V < a w U T ,C o4 P. a 'x � � w o 2 � 4 ate „ r o a� .� •S •5 0 2 ; 0 0 K W O e2 a a Q. waarb' x w U cd a o . N Fi < FIZ ¢ C) wncoka X ®'i0 H o; 7 O a z w as 7w .a ¢ w >• U o. 6' a. O W F a N M M M BB DQ B4 tP. B2 IA H' Z W C4 N 00 r 1` co l- M Z O O, ap � 0 b .. .. Q8 o B F£ ER * B' B: BtBR B tkety: BeEEBe � Be BF BE Bt BR * RBEBeBEER I-i O O 1, c0 M ,D M M V1 N ••, ? V1 M OA r- ^ M 'o .t ••• 00 O O c i a `O V/ et' M —. O V c .-, -: O V1 00 00 PI, r NN. T (- of M 4 04 M �. ai cp‘ V N N .. ,-, N •••• ti la� W �Np o0 lei O O. -- N7h 9 v b b b bn ..-, 00 r- CA r- 41 44 I PN m v.t C of F v F .y w /Z� , U az o 'Z G . c , � V O a 'C O 'A y O w .� w to O F V ate¢ a -ct) o Caal E N h en 0 cd 8 m Ua, ..aC.l a51n°. g ≥ 8 oua 2 va ] µw F•GU b b .. OU .. 2 o i t to 't ` Qc ac � m . . o 2g .ee � Uc0C ' �' � vu. > g0, 16 � 's ;Dg 611 w WO .R E w .C a N _ .. Q a N H en 0. . .c o - N e N O O `- .c O v •mO C m o N ° .d a 0 •C °t11. O . U .=. 4 4.z 6 i w U � x m z Q p wp oa v3 A z w o >-. 0 ..) W « .1 3 w4 4 O 14 z z 0. Z o z 0 UI H � 9 71249 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PROCEDURAL GUIDE APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Del Camino Prerelease Facility Procedural Guide Application Requirements 1) The Planned Unit Development Plan Application is attached. 2) A copy of the Certificate of Title issued by Weld County Title Company is attached which lists any mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts or agreements of record in Weld County which affect the property in the Planned Unit Development. The holders or owners of the above will be required to join in and approve the PUD application. A copy of the Villa's option to purchase real estate is also attached. 3) The attached Certificate of Title documents that there are no public dedica- tions which affect the subject property other than a right of way for county roads thirty feet wide on either side of section and township lines. The dedication of land to the State Department of Transportation for an 1-25 frontage road is addressed in Requirement #4. 4) A letter from Teresa Jones, Regional Development/Access Coordinator for the State Department of Transportation is attached regarding the referenced 1-25 frontage road. A letter from David Davis, Region Preconstruction Engineer, State of Colorado Department of Transportation is attached regarding future plans for reconstruction of the Interstate 25/State Highway 119 Interchange at Del Camino. A letter from John T. Coppom, Administra- tor of the Villa, to Ms. Jones is also attached indicating that a warranty deed will be executed and recorded upon final determination of the frontage road alignment by the Department of Transportation. 5) A Certificate from the County Treasurer is attached showing that no delin- quent taxes are owed on the subject property. 6) A Certificate from LaVern C. Nelson, Engineer, of Nelson Engineers, who is responsible for the design of the utilities, is attached. 7) No deed restrictions or covenants beyond those imposed by the County in the recorded Plat Notes are anticipated regarding the subject property. 9a1249 8) The completed Improvement Agreement form is attached showing the improvements that the applicant is required to construct. Collateral which will guarantee installation of the improvements will be obtained as part of the Bond Issuance financing the project. 9) A narrative prepared by Nelson Engineers is attached which indicates that no off-site road improvements have been determined necessary at this point. Upon referral, the State Department of Transportation may wish to further review any such improvement considerations. 10) An outline summarizing the total area of the Planned Unit Development Plan and other required information prepared by Bley Associates, Architects is as follows: Total Area PUD Plan - 22.24 acres Total Building Square Footage - 123,000 Building Structure - One (1) two level building Total 123,000 Square Footage of Building is commercial Open Storage - Not applicable Loading Dock Court (Screened) Square Footage - 400sf Refer to Architectural Sheet Al - Site Plan No access is proposed to the north property boundary line. On site paved roads direct vehicular traffic to Staff Parking - 66 stalls. Total Parking - 144 (all off-street) Administration/Visitor Parking - 78 stalls. Service/Delivery and Loading Area Square Footage - 690sf Perimeter facility fire lane - road base/gravel surface approximately 20' wide. All on-site paving/parking lots shall be maintained by the Villa. Percentage Uncovered/Covered Space Project Site Approximately 10 acres 931249 44% - Covered 56% - Uncovered 11) A statement regarding how the building proposed for the subject property will be used and operated is included in the Introductory Section. 12) A statement regarding proposed buffering and screening is as follows: The proposed facility is buffered as follows: The outdoor double perimeter fencing obscures direct visibility of the outdoor exercise area and has landscape tree plantings at the perime- ter fencing. Refer to Architectural Sheet A2 - Landscaping Plan No perimeter site buffer screening is proposed on the 22 acre site. The architectural site use and building style does not dictate the need for specific visual buffering requirements. Adjacent Site Uses North - agricultural zone (north of WC Rd 24-1/2, Weld County future sand and gravel mining. East - Agricultural zone - planted crops South - Commercial C-3 zone (Frontage adjacent to Highway 119) West - Del Camino C-3 Zone (1-25 & Colorado State Highway 119 Interchange) 13) There are no public, semi-public, or private open spaces to be utilized as parks, recreational purposes, or other similar type uses. 14) Since the applicant is a single parcel owner, there are no shared common areas. As future development of the Planned Unit Development occurs, shared common open spaces will be addressed as appropriate and required. 9Z1249 15) Refer to Nelson Engineers Site Plan for Utility Easements that have been identified on Architectural Drawing Sheet C3. The building sewer line shall be privately owned and maintained. All other service utility route lines to service the facility shall be established at the time of construction document completion. 16) A Planned Unit Development Construction Schedule describing the stages of construction development for the one (1) two-level building structure is attached. As described above in requirement number 14, there is no common open space involved in this project. 17) A statement describing the method of financing and estimated costs of the building and related site development is as follows: The approximate building costs of the Prerelease Center is $7,000,000, including building and site development. Mr. Russel B. Caldwell of Dougherty Dawkins, Denver, Colorado is handling the bonds which will be issued for the purpose of financing the project. 18) Highway Access Permits Attached are two applications for State Highway Access Permits. See Exhibit Items 18A and 188 19) A letter to the Rural Ditch Company is attached indicating that there is no interference or problems with the ditch associated with the applicant's proposal. Rural Ditch Company acknowledged via phone conversation, Jack Hill to Nelson Engineers, on 8/16/93, that there is no interference with the ditch. Refer to Attachment 19A. 20) GEOLOGY 931249 ' The following data is excerpted from previous soils and geological reports by Empire Laboratories that were performed for the Fort Junction PUD and for adjacent property. Boring log records for test holes 9, 12, 13 and 14 reprinted herein under Item 20D-e and Item 20D-f were taken from a "Report of a Mineral Evaluation" for Siegrist Construction Company, Denver, Colora- do by Empire Laboratories, Inc., 1242 Bramwood Place, Longmont, Colorado 80501, and dated July 12, 1983. Geologic data and boring log records for test holes 1, 5, 7, and 8 reprinted herein under Item 20D-c and Item 20D-d were taken from a "Report of a Geotechnical Investigation" for Rocky Mountain Consultants, Inc., Longmont, Colorado, consultants to the New Creation Church, owners at the time of the Fort Junction, PUD, and dated November 19, 1986. Note that a portion of the information from the Empire Laboratories reports is general and not entirely applicable to the specific site that is the subject of this application. The inapplicable information on Exhibit Item 20B has been marked with asteriks (•). The amended information should read as follows: The site is underlain by a layer of sand and gravel. Approximately five (5) to seven (7) feet of overburden material overlies the gravel, and the gravel layer extends to the bedrock below at depths of nineteen (19) to twenty-one feet as shown by the attached copies of borings in the vicinity. See Exhibit Items 20A, 20B, and 20C 20A) FLOOD, GEOLOGIC AND AIRPORT OVERLAY The building site is situated at least 500 feet south of the Saint Vrain Creek flood plain hazard area according to U.S. Corps of Engineers published data. The site is not located within any hazard areas as defined by the Geologic Hazard Map adopted by Weld County on April 19, 1978. Development of Lot 1, Ft. Junction PUD will not create a change in the characteristics of the subsurface water on the site. Surface water (drainage) is described in the drainage report. Refer to Exhibit Item 20A. 20B) SOILS 9;71249 The soils within the site are defined by the Soil Conservation Service Soil Survey of Weld County southern part as follows: Aquolls-Awents, Gravelly Sugstratum: deep, nearly level in bottom lands and flood plains of major streams. Poorly drained soils that formed in recent alluvium. This application is being accompanied by guideline excerpts from the pub- lished "Soils Survey of Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part", developed by the United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Services (SCS). Their report reveals that the site has some limitations to construction due to localized flooding from row crop irrigation. This area remains relative- ly wet during the summer months due to poor drainage and a high water table. The limiatations have been mitigated in the final design through adequate drainage slopes and discharge areas. See Exhibit Items 20Ba through 20B-i. 20C) MINERAL DEPOSITS The property is approximately 800 feet wide and 1,100 feet long. The Wyco Gas Company has a 50 foot wide easement in the north-south direction, approximately 180 feet west of the east boundary. In addition to the described easements, the Colorado State Highway Depart- ment has preliminary plans for frontage road reconstruction adjacent to the west side of the site. The setback requirements for roads, easements, adjacent properties, and slopes of excavation would result in only about 10 to 12 acres of the 22 acre site available to open pit mining. Further, geotechnical reports for the site as shown on the attached borings in the vicinity reveal that the gravel ranges from 12 to 13 feet in thickness with an average of about 6 feet of overburden. Conversely, lands to the north and east, which have been approved for open pit mining, reveal overburdens of less than 6 feet and mineable gravel thickness of 18.5 feet and upward. The remaining 10 acres which is mineable has a ratio of mineable gravel to overburden of about 2 to 1 . In order for gravel to be of economic value, a ratio of 3 to 1 is necessary. The combination of a limited area available for mining and the limiting ratio of mineable gravel to overburden on the site renders the site unfeasible economically for mining gravel. 9.01.249 20D) BORING LOGS Five pages, attached, are excerpts from soils and geologic reports prepared for the general vicinity by Empire Laboratories, Inc. of Fort Collins and Longmont, Colorado. These reports were completed in July, 1983 and November, 1986. The excerpts pertain only to the immediate vicinity of the site that is the subject of this application. The complete reports are available for review upon request from the appli- cant. See Exhibit Items 20D-a through 20D-f. 21) PROPERTY OWNERS See attached certification of property owners within 500 feet of the proper- ty subject to this application. See Exhibit Items 21A and 216 22) MINERAL OWNERS See attached certification of mineral owners and lessees on or under the property subject to this application. See Exhibit Items 22A and 22B 23) The Weld County Planning Department will provide sufficient signs to be properly posted by the applicant at the County's designated locations on the site. 24) ILLUSTRATIONS Narrative - Project Performance Standards (See Attachment 24A) Illustrations of the proposed architectural style, including layout, profile, computations and design details, materials, color and scale are as indicated on Architectural Sheets Al through A5. Also see attached 24A - Space Summary (Square Footages) and 24B - Conceptual Construction Specification W01249 25) UTILITIES Utility locations are shown on the Utilities and Drainage Plan Map. All utilities will be individual service lines for the proposed building on the site. Easements will be provided at locations to accommodate the utilities as requested by the utility company. Water service for the site will be provided by Central Weld County Water District. There is an existing 12" line along Weld County Road 24. The internal water system will be developed consistent with the Fire Protection District Regulations and approved by the Central Weld County Water Dis- trict. Sanitary sewer service for the site will be provided by the Saint Vrain Sanitation District. At present an 18 inch sewer lies within the subject site. The on-site system will be designed consistent with the District's standards. See Architectural Drawing Sheet C3 - Utility Map See Exhibit 25Ba through 25Bh - Letters from Utility Companies 26) STREETS/ROADS As stated in Requirement 9, no public streets are planned for this develop- ment. All internal driveways are private roads providing access to the proposed building and parking areas. No bridges or culverts are included in the design and all drainage will be directed to the detention ponds shown on the grading and drainage plan. Driveway cross-sections are shown on the site plan. 27) GRADING/DRAINAGE A grading and drainage plan map for the initial PUD application has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of Weld County. The map is being submitted as an attachment to this application. A drainage report comprising a description of the drainage area and drainage design computa- tions is also attached as part of this application. All drainage south of the Rural Ditch in the PUD District will remain in its historical pattern and is and will be intercepted by the Rural Ditch upon completion of this initial PUD application. Subsequent PUD applications for 9a1249 this PUD district will require detailed drainage analyses and drainage plans commensurate with the type and extent of development. Drainage on the eastern half of the PUD north of the Rural Ditch will remain in its historic pattern of flowing northward overland to the road ditch of Weld County Road 24-1/2 and be discharged from the area through the existing culvert at the northeast corner of the site. Drainage affecting the area to be developed and the off-site drainage to that initial PUD plan site are addressed in detail in the following drainage report. The original filing and application for the entire PUD site included a master drainage plan for the entire area. That plan remains in effect except as shown in the drainage study and report for this initial PUD application. See Exhibit Items 27A through 27F The following general statement regarding the Storm Water Management Drainage Plan as required by Paragraph 28.3.1 .9 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance of October 27, 1992 is repeated here as it was approved for the sketch plan for the Fort Junction PUD as submitted in the sketch plan application of July, 1988, for rezoning under County #Z-448. Storm Water Management Drainage Plan - The plan will consist of a system of detention ponds sized in accordance with Weld County requirements to detain runoff flows in excess of the historic rate. Where possible, the detention ponds will be integrated into open space areas. All storm water runoff generated by the development will be routed through the detention ponds and discharged at the historic rate into the existing historic drainage pattern. 28. The entire perimeter of the Pre-Release center shall be landscaped as pro- posed on Architectural Landscape Plan Sheet A2. The plan provides a balance of Evergreen trees at west front of building elevation, deciduous trees in the parking lot areas and perimeter screen areas of the outdoor exercise areas. Sod shall be planted and maintained on the north, south, and west building site elevations by means of an underground sprinkler system. Seeded crested wheat shall be planted and maintained by underground and surface piped sprinkler system at site perimeter. Refer to Architects Landscape Site Plan Sheet A2. 90.1249 See Exhibit 28A - Sodding Architectural Specification See Exhibit 288 - Trees, Plants, Ground Cover Architectural Specification 29) FINAL PUD PLAT The final PUD plat has been prepared in accord with the requirements of Weld County, Colorado. The final PUD plat is submitted as an attachment to this application. See Architectural Drawing Sheet C3. 9c31249 ATTACHMENTS AS REFERENCED IN APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS 9C1249 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPLICATION Department of Planning Services, 915 10th Street, Room 342, Greeley, Colorado PHONE: 356-4000 Ext. 4400 FOR PLANNING DEPARTMENT USE ONLY: CASE NO. APPLICATION FEE ZONING DISTRICT RECEIPT NO. DATE RECORDING FEE APPLICATION CHECKED BY RECEIPT NO. TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT: (Print or type only except for required signatures. ) I (we) , the undersigned, hereby request a hearing before the Weld County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners concerning proposed subdivision of the following described unincorporated area of Weld County. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 0 55F175‘ SEP 21993 (If additional space is required, attach an additional sheet e Weld Comity Planning NAME OF PROPOSED PUD SUBDIVISION Fort Junction EXISTING ZONING PUD NO. OF PROPOSED LOTS 2 TOTAL AREA (ACRES) 54.625 LOT SIZE: AVERAGE T.B.D MINIMUM To Be Determined UTILITIES: WATER: NAME Central Weld County Water District SEWER: NAME Saint Vrain Sanitation District GAS: NAME Rocky Mountain Natural Gas PHONE: NAME US West Communications ELECTRIC: NAME United Power, Inc. DISTRICTS: SCHOOL: NAME Saint Vrain School District RElJ FIRE: NAME Mountain View Fire Protection District DESIGNER'S NAME Blev Associates, Architects-Planners PHONE 330-3322 ADDRESS 2020 Clubhouse Drive, Greeley. Colorado ENGINEER'S NAME Nelson Engineers PHONE 356-6362 ADDRESS 822 7th Street. Greeley, Colorado FEE OWNERS OF AREA PROPOSED FOR PUD SUBDIVISION NAME The Villa at Greeley, Inc. PHONE 353-9263 ADDRESS 1750 6th Avenue, Greeley, Colorado NAME I ADDRESS e4-'7/23 NAME i ADDRESS >,1, GtGe APPLICANT OR AUTHORIZED AGENT (if different than above) l' c t f<4' L_�_ /?7, , NAME John T. Connom, Administrator ADDRESS 1750 6th Avenue, Greeley. Colorado HOME TELEPHONE 1/ 330-3576 BUSINESS TELEPHONE # 353-9263 I hereby depose and state under the penalties of perjury that all statements, proposals, and plans submitted with or contained within this application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. COUNTY OF WELD ) ) SS STATE OF COLORADO) / 7 S"g'ature: Owner or Agent i — Subscribed and sworn to before me this 18th day of AUGUST 19 93 `'I1`( .�..1.A S,. 0 I OTARY UBLIC 1 My Commission expires 9S�t 911249 --- ----_--- EXHIBIT ITEM 2 COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE UNITED GENERAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY United General Title Insurance Company,a Louisiana Corporation,herein called the Company,for a valuable consideration,hereby commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance,as identified in Schedule A,in favor of the proposed Insured named in Schedule A,as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest covered hereby in the land described or referred to in Schedule A,upon payment of the premiums charged therefore: all subject to the provisions of Schedule A and B and to the Conditions and Stipulations hereto. This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the proposed Insured and the amount of the policy or policies commited for have been inserted in Schedule A hereof by the Company,either at the time of issuance of this Commitment or by subsequent endorsement. This Commitment is preliminary to the issuance of such policy or policies of title insurance and all liability and obligations hereunder shall cease and terminate 180 days after the Effective Date hereof or when the policy or policies commited for shall be issued,whichever first occurs,provided that the failure to issue policy or policies is not the fault of the Company. In Witness Whereof, the Company has caused its Corporate Name and Seal to be hereunto affixed: this instrument, including Commitment, Conditions and Stipulation attached, to become valid when Schedule A and Schedule B have been attached hereto. UNITED GENERAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY ate) U 474 President � �` 13. Secretary l �4A1,E Countersigned 51e7 / (r Au orired Officer or Agent This policy valid only if Schedules A and B are attached L r 9--1 ALTA Commitment 1966 L U(T Form 150A CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS 1. The term "mortgage",when used herein,shall include deed of trust,trust deed,or other security instrument. 2. If the proposed Insured has acquired actual knowledge of any defect,lien,encumbrance,adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment other than those shown in Schedule B hereof,and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to the Company in writing,the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage resulting from any act of reliance hereon to the extent the Company is prejudiced by failure to so disclose such knowledge. If the proposed Insured -- shall disclose such knowledge to the Company,or if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect,lien, encumbrance,adverse claim or other matter,the Company at its option may amend Schedule B of this Commitment accordingly,but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations. 3. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named proposed Insured and such parties included under the definition of Insured in the form of policy or policies committed for and only for actual loss incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith(a)to comply with the requirements hereof,or(b)to eliminated exceptions shown in Schedule B,or(c)to acquire or create the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. In no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the policy or policies committed for and such liability is subject to the insuring provisions,the Conditions and Stipulations and the Exclusions from Coverage of the form of policy or policies committed for in favor of the proposed Insured which arc hereby incorporated by reference and are made a part of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein. 4. Any action or actions or rights of action that the proposed Insured may have or may bring against the Company arising out of the status of the title to the estate or interest or the status of the mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment must be based on and are subject to the provisions of this Commitment. STANDARD EXCEPTIONS The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company. 1. Defects,liens,encumbrances,adverse claims or other matters,if any,created,first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed Insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 2. Any lien,or right to a lien,for services,labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished,imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 3. Any discrepancies,conflicts in boundary lines,encroachments,easements,measurements,variations in area or content,party walls and/ or other facts which a correct survey and/or a physical inspection of the premises would disclose. 4. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown in the public records. 5. In the event this Commitment is issued with respect to a construction loan to he disbursed in future periodic installments,then the policy shall contain an additional exception which shall read as follow: Pending disbursement of the full proceeds of the loan secured by the mortgage insured, this policy only insures the amount actually disbursed,but increases as proceeds are disbursed in good faith and without knowledge of any intervening lien or interest to or for the account of the mortgagor up to the amount of the policy. Such disbursement shall not extend the date of the policy or change any part thereof — unless such change is specifically made by written endorsement duly issued on behalf of the Company. Upon request by the Insured(and payment of the proper charges therefore),the Company's agent or approved attorney will search the public records subsequent to the date of the policy and fumish the insured a continuation report showing such matters affecting title to the land as they have appeared in the public records subsequent to the date of the policy or date of the last preceding continuation report, and if such continuation report shows intervening lien,or liens,or interest to or for the account of the mortgagor,then in such event this policy does not increase in liability unless such matters as actually shown on such continuation report are removed from the public records by the insured. 9j12119 ENDORSEMENT No. -1- Attached to and forming a part of COMMITMENT NO. UM27549 ISSUED BY UNITED GENERAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY The amount in Item 2A, in Schedule A, is hereby amended to read: $425,000.00 RE: NEW CREATION MINISTRIES AND WORLD OUTREACH CENTER CHURC[I, A NON-PROFIT CORPORATION THE VILLA AT GREELEY, INC. , A COLORADO CORPORATION This endorsement, when signed below by a Validating Signatory, is made a part of the commitment. It is subject to all the terms of the commitment and prior endorsements. Except as expressly stated on this endorsement, the terms, dates and amount of the commitment and prior endorsements are not changed. UNITED GENERAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Dated: AUGUST 17, 1993 ��" BY �!G"., - Validatig signatory SH 9=71.249 COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE * * * * * SCHEDULE A 1. Effective Date: JUNE 4, 1993 @ 7:00 A. M. RE: Our Order No. : UM27549 2. Policy or Policies to be issued: A. ALTA Owner's Policy Amount $ 200,000.00 Proposed Insured: THE VILLA AT GREELEY, INC. , A COLORADO CORPORATION B. ALTA Loan Policy Amount $ Proposed Insured: C. ALFA Loan Policy Amount $ Proposed Insured: 3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment and covered herein is a fee simple, and title thereto is at the effective date hereof vested in: NEW CREATION MINISTRIES AND WORLD OUTREACH CENTER CHURCH, A NON-PROFIT CORPORATION 4. The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: LOT 'A' OF AMENDED RECORDED EXEMPTION NO. 1313-2-3-RE730 ACCORDING TO THE MAP RECORDED APRIL 8, 1987 IN BOOK 1152 AS RECEPTION NO. 2095052, BEING A PORTION OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M. , WELD COUNTY, COLORADO. - 1 - 921249 COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE * * * * * SCHEDULE B Section 1 RE: Our Order No. : UM27549 The following are the requirements to be complied with: Item (a) Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be insured. Item (b) Payment of all taxes, changes or assessments, levied and assessed against the subject premises which are due and payable. Item (c) The following instrument(s) must be properly executed and filed of record in the Official Land Records of Weld County, Colorado, to wit: 1. Warranty Deed from NEW CREATION MINISTRIES AND WORLD OUTREACH CENTER CHURCH, A NON-PROFIT CORPORATION to THE VILLA AT GREELEY, INC. , A COLORADO CORPORATION conveying the land described herein. 2. Resolution of the governing board of NEW CREATION MINISTRIES AND WORLD OUTREACH CENTER CHURCH, a Non-Profit COLpuration, authorizing the within contemplated transaction; said Resolution must contain an acknowledged certification by an officer of said corporation with the coLporate seal affixed. The following information is disclosed pursuant to Section 10-11-122 of the Colorado Revised Statutes, 1987, Repl. Vol: (A) THE SUBJECT REAL PROPERTY MAY BE LOCATED IN A SPECIAL TAXING DISTRICT; (B) A CERTIFICATE OF TAXES DUE LISTING EACH TAXING JURISDICTION SHALL BE OBTAINED FROM THE COUNTY TREASURER OR THE COUNTY TREASURERS AUTHORIZED AGENT; (C) INFORMATION REGARDING SPECIAL DISTRICtS AND THE BOUNDARIES OF SUCH DISTRICT MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, THE COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER, OR THE COUNTY ASSESSOR. - 2 - SZ1249 COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE * * * * * SCHEDULE B Section 2 RE: Our Order No. : UM27549 EXCEPTIONS: The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions for defects, liens, encuMbranrps, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the st the tate or interest matters mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment; and exceptions following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records. 3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, and any facts which a correct survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for servirPs, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5. Taxes and assessments which are a lien or due and payable; and any tax, special assessments, charges or lien imposed for water or sewer service, or for any other special taxing district, any unredeemed tax sales.t due or 6. *****Nes Cor the CIPE: Plyaar 19 , a lien, but not ease see Requirement Item b,eSchedule payable. ySSeection 1. 7. Right of way for COUNTY ROADS 30 feet wide on either side of section and township lines as established by ORDER OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR WELD COUNTY, recorded OC'T'OBER 14, 1889 in BOOK 86 at PAGE 273. 8. Right of way for PIPE LINE purposes as granted to WYCO PIPE LINE COMPANY, A DELAWARE CORPORATION by instrument recorded MARCH 13, 1947 in BOOK 1199 at PAGE 427, said right of way not being specifically defined. 9. Terms, conditions and provisions of GATE JUNCTION CONTRACT, between FRED E. CALLENDER AND JULIA E. CALLENDER and WYCO PIPE LINE COMPANY recorded NOVEMBER 14, 1947 in BOOK 1215 at PAGE 88. (SEE COPY ATTACHED HERETO) . CONTINUED NEXT PAGE - 3 - 9-u.12 49 B-2 CONTINUED UM27549 10. Easement for UTILITY purposes as granted to SAINT VRA N SANITATION DISTRICT, A SPECIAL DISTRICT by instrument recorded JUNE 6, 1989 in BOOK 1234 as RECEPTION NO. 2181785, said easement being a 20 foot wide permanent easement located in the W 1/2 of the SW 1/4 of Section 2, Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. Said easement being West of and adjacent to the following described line: Commencing at the Southeast Corner of the W 1/2 of the SW b/4 of said Section 2 and considering the South line of said SW 1/4 to bear North 89 46'09" West, with all other haarings contained herein being relative thereto; Thence North 89046'09" West, 25.69 feet; Thence North 01-23'56" EaEt, 1286.20 feet to a point on the North right-of-way life of the rural ditch, which is the True Point of Beginning; Thence continue North 01 23'56" East, a distance of 1: 16.57 feet to the Point of Termination, which is the South right-of-way line of Weld County Road 24 1/2. Also: A 20 foot wide temporary construction easement-adjacent 1:O and contiguous with the West side of the above described permanent easement. 11. Oil and Gas Lease from MILTON L. KAHN AND EDWIN S. KAHN to AMOCO PRODUCTION COMPANY, recorded DECEMBER 6, 1972 in BD)K 681 as RECEPTION NO. 1603120; re-recorded AUGUST 13, 1973 in BOOK 697 as RECEPTION NO. 1619262, and any interests therein, assignments or conveyanrps thereof. Said Lease extended by AFFIDAVIT OF LEASE EXTENSION OR PRODUCTION recorded AUGUST 6, 1975 in BOOK 745 as RECEPTION NO. 1666596. 12. Except the Southerly portion of subject property approximately 75 feet in width for County Road as shown on the map of Amended Recorded Exemption No. 1313-2-3-RE730 recorded APRIL 8, 1987 in BOOK .152 as RECEPTION NO. 2095052. 13. Subject to right of ways and ea :orients for utilities, roads and ditches as shown on Fort Junction P U D District Plit recorded FEBRUARY 13, 1990 in BOOK 1255 as RECEPTION NO. 2205251. ort Junction P U District Plat recorded 14. abject FEBRUARYt13, 1990o Plat oinsBOOK 1255 as ]as RECEPTIONned on F D NO. 2205251. (SEE COPY ATTACHED HERETO) 15. Right of Way for Rural Ditch a:s Shown on various maps of record. • CONTINUED NEXT PAGE - 4 - 92149 B-2 CONTINUED UM27549 16. The following notices have been recorded with the Clerk and Recorder of Weld County pursuant to CRS 9-1.5-103(1) . These instruments do not define the exact location of the undeLywuund facilities and may or may not affect the subject property: NOTICES BOOK RECEPTION NO. A) MOUNTAIN BELL 949 1870705 B) PANHANDLE EASTERN PIPELINE 949 1870756 C) UNION RURAL ELECTRIC 949 1871004 D) WESTERN SLOPE GAS 990 1919757 E) ASSOCIATED GAS 1037 1974810 F) COIDRADO INSTATE GAS 1041 1979784 G) ASSOCIATED NATURAL GAS, INC. 1110 2050953 H) PANHANDLE EASTERN PIPELINE 1117 2058722 I) ASSOCIATED NATURAL-GAS, INC. 1187 2132709 J) ST. VRAIN SANITATION DISTRICT 1218 2164975 K) ASSOCIATED NATURAL GAS, INC. 1229 2175917 L) UNITED POWER, INC. FORMERLY UNION RURAL FTFCTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC. 1288 2239296 - 5 - 921249 EXHIBIT ITEM 2B OPTION TO PURCHASE REAL ESTATE This Option to Purchase Real Estate is dated this 21st day of July, 1993, and is between The Villa At Greeley, Inc. , (The Villa) 1750 Sixth Avenue, Greeley,Colorado, 80631, and New Creation Ministries and World Outreach Center Church (The Church) , a non- profit corporation, 737 Bross, Longmont,Colorado 80501. 1. Grant of Option. The Church, in consideration of the sum of $10, 000. 00 received from The Villa, hereby grants The Villa the exclusive option to purchase, the following described real property located in Weld County, Colorado upon the following terms and conditions: Legal Description Attached as Exhibit "A" : a parcel of land consisting of 54. 625 acres more or less, existing farmhouse and outbuildings, Water Rights: 1 1/2 shares Rural Ditch, and mineral rights. 2. Option Period. This Option shall run commencing with the effective date hereof to and until 5:00 PM, July 2, 1994, when this Option shall expire if not previously exercised by the Villa. 3 . Purchase Price. If this Option is exercised by The Villa, the Villa and The Church agree that the purchase price shall be $425, 000.00 (Four hundred twenty-five thousand dollars) and the $10, 000 Option money paid by The Villa shall be applied to the purchase price. The purchase price shall be paid by Cashier's Check or wire transfer of funds at the time of closing. The Option consideration in the amount of $10, 000 receipted for shall be held by Dyer Realty, Inc. , 430 Main Street, Longmont, Colorado. Upon the expiration of the option period the option consideration shall be paid over to the Church if The Villa fails to exercise this Option during the Option period unless such failure to exercise the Option is due to failure of any of the conditions precedent described in paragraph 5 to be met. If the Option is not exercised because the conditions precedent described in paragraph 5 are not met or waived by The Villa, the Option consideration shall be returned to The Villa upon written demand. If there is any dispute over the Option consideration escrowed herein, Dyer Realty, Inc. shall have the right to interplead the sum into the Weld County Colorado District Court and recover its reasonable expenses, including attorneys fees incurred in such interpleader. The Villa agrees to pay 50% (fifty percent) of those engineering costs incurred through Nelson Engineering Company to a maximum of $3, 500.00 (Three thousand five hundred dollars) for services rendered to survey the subject parcel and prepare engineering plans necessary to allow the land to be subdivided and sold to The Villa for use as a preparole facility. 9u''•1249 4 . Exercise of Option. This Option may be exercised at any time during the Option period by written notice to Dyer Realty, Inc. personally delivered to 430 Main Street, Longmont, CO. , or sent by certified mail, return receipt requested to the following address: P.O.Box 2485, Longmont, Colorado, 80501. 5. Failure to Exercise Option. The Option payment shall be retained by The Church if The Villa fails to exercise the option for any reason; except that it will be refunded (1) if The Villa is refused a building permit for the construction of a preparole center and therefore is prohibited or enjoined from getting a building permit; (2) If an acceptable contract with the State of Colorado to operate a preparole release facility is not obtained; or (3) If acceptable financing for the preparole facility is not obtained. If any of the above conditions precedent are not satisfied by June 1, 1994 , the Villa shall have the right to give notice to Dyer Realty, Inc. in person or by mail at the address provided in paragraph 4 above in which event the Option consideration of $10, 000 shall be immediately refunded to The Villa. If said Option is not exercised, it is hereby mutually understood and agreed that The Villa will give a written release of all rights, title, interest, and claims for any activities or exploration work performed or productions on such property. 6. Date of Closing. The transaction shall be closed by the parties within thirty days after the Option is exercised by The Villa. The closing shall take place at the office of Colorado Escrow, 520 Main Street, Longmont, Colorado. The fee charged by the title insurance company for the closing shall be shared by both parties and shall be based upon fees customarily charged by the title insurance company. 7 . Title Insurance. If The Villa exercises its option, The Church shall, within ten days of exercise, deliver to The Villa a title insurance commitment issued by a licensed title insurance company doing business in Weld County, Colorado, committing said company to insure the title of The Villa free and clear of all liens and encumbrances, subject only to standard printed title exceptions, and any terms and conditions of the land established by Weld County government acceptable to The Villa. Seller will have the title insurance policy delivered to the Purchaser as soon as practicable after closing, and shall pay the premium at closing. 8. Conveyance. The Church shall execute and deliver to the Villa a good and sufficient general warranty deed at the time of closing conveying the real property to The Villa free of all liens and encumbrances except those shown on the title insurance commitment and accepted by The Villa. The real property taxes, if any, assessed against the real property shall be prorated to the date of closing. 9' x9 9. Possession. The Villa shall be entitled to enter into the real property prior to exercising this Option for the sole purpose of taking measurements, testing soils, and making other determinations to be used in its decision as to whether or not to exercise the Option. Complete possession shall be delivered to The Villa by delivery of the deed at closing. Regardless of whether closing does or does not occur, The Villa hereby agrees to indemnify and hold Seller harmless from any and all claims and demands, judgments, liens, awards, costs and expenses (including litigation expenses and attorneys fees and costs) which may arise from the acts and/or omissions of The Villa, their agents, employees, and independent contractors. Such indemnification shall extend to any and all claims and demands, including without limitation: all workers compensation claims, mechanics' liens, vendor and materialmen's liens, architect's liens, merchanic's liens by drilling companies, surveyors, and engineers, claims and demands for bodily injury, death, and/or property damage, and any and all claims and demands which may arise from such activities, including engineering requirements, testing soils, and all other activities conducted by The Villa on said property. This indemnification shall extend to all claims and demands asserted by any third person or entity, including Buyer's employees, agents and independent contractors. 10. Commission. Any commission due Dyer Realty, Inc. of Longmont, Colorado shall be based upon agreement between Dyer Realty and The Church. 11. It is hereby mutually understood and agreed The Villa will not record this contract with Weld County or the Secretary of State of Colorado without the expressed written consent of The Church. 12 . Environmental Issues. With respect to the condition of the property described herein, Sellers warrant that, to their best information, knowledge, and belief: A. They are unaware of any contamination existing upon the premises that would be considered or classified as an environmentally hazardous material. B. They are unaware of any current or past activity or process undertaken on the premises involving hazardous material or the storage thereof, with the exception of the storage and use of approved fertilizers and pesticides normally utilized in agricultural activities. C. There is no contamination of the subject property which is in violation of any applicable federal or state law or regulation. 13 . " SPECIAL TAXING DISTRICTS may be subject to general obligation indebtedness that is paid by revenues produced from annual tax levies on the taxable property within such districts. Property owners in such districts may be placed at risk for increased mill levies and excessive tax burdens to support the servicing of such debt where circumstances arise resulting in the inability of such a district to discharge such indebtedness without 971249 ' such an increase in mill levies. Purchasers should investigate the debt financing requirements of the authorized general obligation indebtedness of such districts, existing mill levies of such district servicing such indebtedness, and the potential for an increase in such mill levies. " 14 . It is hereby mutually understood and acknowledged that land within the real property will be dedicated to the State of Colorado for a frontage road as affirmed in a letter dated Mav 21, 1993 , from the State Department of Transportation, and this letter affirms that the State will pay the cost of this road. 15. Binding Effect. This Option Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto, their successors and assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties above named have executed this agreement on the ;;Z/J" day of July, 1993. NEW CREATION MINISTRIES AND WORLD OUTREACH CENTER CHURCH Longmont, Colorado 80501, a non-profit corporation � BY �� _ BY e t,d ' t �� ce r-N KY Wayne . Pendleton , President My commission expires: BY My Commission Expires Jan.17, 1997 J. . Mus g Secy.-Treasurer ATTEST: VIL AT GREELEY, INC. VILLA T7 GREEL Y,INC. BYf _ /i [r President BY S retary-Tr urer ATTEST: No commission owed by The Villa. Dyer Realty, Inc. receipts for the sum of $10,000 pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Option to Purchase Real Estate and agrees to hold the same in trust pursuant to the terms and conditions hereof and to payover and deliver such sum to the party entitled to receipt of the same as provided in this Agreement. Dated: 2r/1 111 /7/ 3 DYER REALTY, INC. BY7 «� 2 9Z12-19 Exhibit "A", 21 G1 L_UESCRIPTIOM • A PART OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW 1/4) OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 2 I NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6T11 PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, WELD COUNTY, • COLORADO, Alit) MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT.. THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 2 At1D CONSIDER- ING THE SOUTH LINE OP THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW 1/4) TO EAR SOUTH SOUTH 89°46'09" EAST, WITH ALL OTHERBEARINGS RELATIVE T ERETO; THEIICE• SOUTH''89°46' 09" EAST,' 564 .90 FEET ALONG T)IE.,SOUTH. LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW 1/4) or SECTION 2; ' THENCE NORTH 00°15'52" EAST, 30.00 FEET TO- A POINT ON TILE EASTERLY LINE OF' A'.-PARCEL OF.LAND DEEDED TO THE COLORADO'DEPARTMENT OP'HIGH- WAYS IN BOOK 1500, PAGE 551 OF TILE:WELD. COUNTY RECORDS; `j . THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY LIVE THE FOLLOWING TWO C.U1tSE6; NORTH 52°51.' 30" WEST,-75.00 FEET; , ' I NORTN113'4C'3S"WEST, 602.03 -FEET TO TILE. POINT OF- BEGINNING; I THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE THE - OLLOWIthG IT1IREE COURSES: 1 NORTH 13°40'30° WEST, 739.65 FEET; NORTH. 04°36'00":WEST, 067.31 TEET TO A POINT OP CURVATURE; • ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WIIOSE'RADIUS IS 11,297.64 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF- 2°10'00" AND AN ARC LENGTH OF 427:23 FEET TO A POINT OF THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST. QUARTER (SW I - 1/4)'OF SAID;SECTION 2 AND THE END 'OF THE EASTLINE. OF THE PARCEL- DESCRIBED IN BOOK 1500, PAGE 551;. THENCE SOUTH '89°35.'48" EAST, 1120.00 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OP THE SOUTHWEST. (SFI 1/4 ) OF•SAID SECTION 2; THENCE SOUTH 75°55'' 48" EAST, 132.00 FEET;• '� THENCE SOUTH O1°23'SG" WEST, 2633. 52 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF TILE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-7/4 ) OF SAID SECTION 2;. I IL THENCE NORTH 09°46'09" WEST, 174 .30 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH/LINE OF _ THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW 1/.4) OF SECTION 2; 1 ,� ' THENCE NORTH O1°23'56" EAST, 660.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 69°46'09" WEST, 753.08 FEET TO THE-POINT OP BEGINNING. 'SAID PARCEL' CONTAINS 54.625 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. - I . 1 9 :3249 _Cby),y ti L i / i ' ' 3 /a:- RECEIVED MAY 2 6 1993 STATE OF COLORADO • DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ,• OT Region4 C 1420 2nd Street P.O.Box 850 Weld Co. , EFR I 25 Greeley,Colorado 80632-0850 (303)353-1232 Fort Junction PUD NE Corner, 125, east of SH 119, N. of WCR 24 Del Camino May 21, 1993 Mr. Vern Nelson, PE Greeley Natl. Plaza 822 7th Street Greeley CO 80631 Dear Vern, The request which has been made for deletion of the requirement to construct (or guarantee construction of) the new East Frontage Road in the area of the Fort Junction property has been resolved. Participation in the construction by the property owner will no longer be required, although the necessary right- of-way must be provided for the future highway alignment. That 80 feet of ROW shall be dedicated by the owner. The Department's reversal of its prior position on this issue was influenced by a number of factors. I have reviewed your request with Mr. Chuck Cunliffe, Weld County Planning Director. We discussed the proper action which should be taken in regard to the reversal of our prior requirement. Mr. Cunliffe has stated that at such time as the PUD is submitted for approval it will come to this Department for my review. My review should refer to the Plat Note c. , stating that the construction will no longer be required, and that the new frontage road construction will be handled by the Department. A note in regard to the provision of ROW will be added, stating that we will still require dedication of the necessary ROW. Reconstruction of the Del Camino Interchange is slated for 1993 . I hope that this resolves your question. This letter can serve as your written documentation of this decision by the Department. Should you wish to discuss this further, I can be contacted at 350-2163 . Sincerel , Ter G. Jones Region Develop t/Access Coordinator TGJ xc: D. Yost * M. Fanning * file Mr. Chuck Cunliffe , Weld County Planning Director 9: , 9 AUG-18-'95 14: 16 ID:CD0H CD0H GREELEY CO TEL NI0:3113-3502170 p137 P02 Exhibit Item 4B • STATE OF COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION r I. e POT P.O.Box 850 1420 2nd Slrset Greeley,Colorado 80632-0650 (303)353-1232 August 17, 1993 IM-IRCX) 025-3(110) Del Camino Interchange p Subaccount 91033 Mr, Art Uhrich � VEQ P3� 'I u Nelson Engineers IRE - 822 7th Street, Suite 520 Greeley, Colorado 80631 Dear Mr. Uhrich: Thank you for contacting the Region 4 office of the Colorado Department of Transpor- tation regarding future plans for reconstruction of the Interstate 25/State Highway 119 interchange at Del Camino, It is our understanding that Weld County has re- quested a metes and bounds description .of the easterly realignment of the frontage road in relation to your client's property northeast of 1-25 and Weld County Road 24. We are currently in the process of designing an interchange which will accommodate the eventual widening of I-25 to six lanes. In about one month, we expect to have a preliminary design establishing the location of the future frontage road intersection on County Road 24 as well as the on/off ramp terminal, Until the design is determined, we can not provide a precise location for the new frontage road intersection along County Road 24 . For your information, reconstruction of the interchange is currently scheduled for the Fall of 1995, An alignment for the relocation of the frontage road east of I-25 had been provided to developers a number of years ago prior to the current planning for widening 1-25 to six lanes. It may be necessary to adjust the previously determined location and alignment to allow for the six-lane concept. Any adjustment of the previous frontage road concept will require coordination with the development on both sides of County Road 24 to ensure a single location for the ultimate frontage road intersection. Please contact Mr. Dave Forsyth at 757-9392 in our Denver design squad for further information on the status of interchange plans. Very trulyy//y yours, David D. Davis Region Preconstruction Engineer DUD(WRJ)cm cc: Weld County Planning Dept. T. Jones q D. Forsyth Sv 1249 File via Elmquist Exhibit Item 4C State of Colorado Department of Transportation Region 4 1420 2nd Street P.O. Box 850 Theresa Jones, Region Development/Access Coordinator Greeley, Colorado 80632-0850 Re: Weld Co., EFR 125 Fort Junction PUD NE Corner, 125 east of SH 119, N. of WCR 24 Del Camino Dear Ms. Jones, It is our understanding that a final Warranty Deed shall be required for the align- ment of the 125 frontage road at such time that the Colorado State Department of Highways constructs the required frontage road at a future date. A Warranty Deed shall be executed and recorded upon final determination of the frontage road alignment by the Department of Transportation. Respectfully, John Coppom Villa Administrator • 9,1,.49 EXHIBIT ITEM 5 STATE OF COL^RADO CERTIFI/ rE OF TAXES DUE C�L� s. S. COUNTY Of WELDc...., 1 I, the undersigned, County Treasurer in and for said County, do hereby certify that there are no unpaid taxes, or unredeemed tax sales, as appears of record in the office,on the following described property,to-wit: TR NO. ..,.,,., . ... .. - +:'t".... :; S:�L'•!%•! :: 2 68 COMM AT SW (.:(.)i'4 t.N.. SEC 'ARCEL •.!.1. �'.�.�•• ::.;7C),) ' T. I ..(. LAME 62131.3020000'Z',3 k THENCE 889D46 'E!:: 564.90 ' TO TRUE I 'oxe THENCE NEW CREATION IY17:N:CSTRTl:::': & I. 0I):i 'E 3c} ' N5 )5 . 'W .7:"+ ' Ill:L3D4t:s 'W 1342.40 ' VENDOR t_i •4):).:i7 1 J 'W 8'7 i . y ' SW'. tC f ,:i1. ' '1'�(�i::�.?.1.�} ' W ��i:.•j n :,:r �l.# N I...h•I OF !O. T111;. VILLA AT GREELEY INC THENCE 09I.t35 'I-. :L:1.'i:.0 ' ?/'sD'''i 'I::. .I..:?.c' ' 4:i0:LI}t:.:±'W M/1.:190 '.%.633. 52 ' N89D46 'W 7;,7..80' TO TRUE FOB EXC COMM - ::W Cc:' OF SEC 889D4 6 'E I::: 564.90 ' TO TRUE POB THENCE )CI;CT.— +:+ hOI)1.'''1=: 'I) ' Ikl'.ixI);71. 'W 1,`'.y' i1:L;:ik}4E:# 't►J +{? (3:`.i' -ii3`7'I)r4�a `1 : TAXES $951 .06 753.08' 6011:}2.3'W 660 ' THENCE:: 1.4891)46'W 533.42 ' 10 TRUE ROB LOT A AMENDED i'4EC 1::.X(:.1'11 f E•••.Y30) (2D) %11220 W(:.ft 9% TOTAL AMOUNT T• DUE_ FOR THIS i.; PARCEL IS $0.00 TAX AUTHORITY LEVY TAX •T-AX AUTHORITY LEVY TAX tr '22.457 1.84.60 SCFHOOl... I}I S.T RE::L 5:I. .. :120 420.20 NCW WATER 1 .000 8.22 I...(.NGMO NT FIRE 9.731 79.99 ST. VRAIN SAN 29.990 246..5 : WELT) LIBRARY 1. .50() :L2..33 This does not include land or improvements assessed separately unless specifically requested. Information regarding special taxing districts and the boundaries of such districts may be on file or deposit with the Board of County Commissioners,the County Clerk and Recorder, or the County Assessor. r1(.1(::T(.1S'T' 12. 1.99.J FRANCIS M.LOUSTALET 1992 TAXES S PAID $951 .86* ASURER OF WELD COUN`• \ QA-'-'3 \ C-lb- --- 6^ By 1249 D DUTY • 6 , CERTIFICATION Engineers Certification I, LaVern C. Nelson, being a registered Professional Engineer in the State of Colorado, do hereby certify that the on-site utilities have been designed by me or under my direct supervision, and that to the best of my knowledge, are accurate and in conformance with the codes of Weld Couunty and the applicable laws of the State of Colorado. gilt at�� aVern Nelson Colo. Registration #2683 3-7.1.249 IMPROVEMENTS AGREEMENT • 971Z19 EXHIBIT ITEM 8 IMPROVEMENTS AGREEMENT ACCORDING POLICY REGARDING COLLATERAL FOR IMPROVEMENTS THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this _ day of by and between the County of Weld, State of Colorado, acting through its Board of County Commissioners, hereinafter called "County" , and The Villa at Greeley, Inc. hereinafter called "Applicant" . WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Applicant is the owner of or has a controlling interest in the following described property in the County of Weld, Colorado: LOT "A" of AMENDED RECORDED EXEMPTION NO.1313-2-3-RE730 ACCORDING TO THE MAP RECORDED APRIL 8, 1987 IN BOOK 1152 AS RECEPTION NO. 2095052, BEING A PORTION OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M. , WELD COUNTY, COLORADO. WHEREAS, a final subdivision plat of said property, to be known as Lot 1 Ft. Junction PHD, First Filing has been submitted to the County for approval; and WHEREAS, Section 11-1 of the Weld County Subdivision Regulations provides that no final plat shall be approved by the County until the Applicant has submitted a Subdivision Improvement Agreement guaranteeing the construction of the public improvements shown on plans, plats and supporting documents of the subdivision, which improvements, along with a time schedule for completion, are listed in Exhibits "A" and "B" of this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF the foregoing and of the acceptance and approval of said final plat, the parties hereto promise, covenant and agree as follows: 1.0 Engineering Services: Applicant shall furnish, at its own expense, all engineering services in connection with the design and construction of the subdivision improvements listed on Exhibit "A" which is attached hereto and made a part hereof by this reference. 1.1 The required engineering services shall be performed by a Professional Engineer and Land Surveyor registered in the State of Colorado, and shall conform to the standards and criteria established by the County for public improvements. 1.2 The required engineering services shall consist of, but not be limited to, surveys, designs, plans and profiles , estimates, construction supervision, and the submission of necessary documents to the County. 1.3 Applicant shall furnish drawings and cost estimates for roads within the subdivision to the County for approval prior to the letting of any construction contract. Before acceptance of the roads within the subdivision by the County, Applicant shall furnish one set of reproducible "as-built" drawings and a final statement of construction cost to the County. 2.0 Rights-of-Way and Easements: Before commencing the construction of any improvements herein agreed upon, Applicant shall acquire, at its own expense, good and sufficient rights-of-way and easements on all lands and facilities traversed by the proposed improvements. All such rights-of-way and easements used for the construction of roads to be accepted by the County shall be conveyed to the County and the documents of conveyance shall be furnished to the County for recording. 3 .0 constr,+rrinn. Aoolicant shall furnish and install, at its own expense, the subdivision improvements listed on Exhibit "A" which is attached hereto and made a part hereof by this reference, according to the construction schedule set out in Exhibit "B" also attached hereto and made a part hereof by this reference. 3.1 Said construction shall be in strict conformance to the plans and drawings approved by the County and the specifications adopted by the County for such_ public improvements. Whenever a subdivision is proposed within three miles of an incorporated community located in 1 931249 Weld County or located in any adjacent county, the Applicant shall be required to install improvements in accordance with the requirements and standards that would exist if the plat were developed within the corporate limits of that community. If the incorporated community has not adopted such requirements and standards at the time the subdivision is proposed, the requirements and standards of the County shall be adhered to. If both the incorporated community and the County have requirements and standards, those requirements and standards that are more restrictive shall apply. 3.2 Applicant shall employ, at its own expense, a qualified testing company previously approved by the County to perform all testing of materials or construction that is required by the County; and shall furnish copies of test results to the County. 3.3 At all times during said construction, the County shall have the right to test and inspect or to require testing and inspection of material and work at Applicant's expense. Any material or work not conforming to the approved plans and specifications shall be removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the County at Applicant's expense. 3.4 The Applicant shall furnish proof that proper arrangements have been made for the installation of sanitary sewer or septic systems, water, gas, electric and telephone services. 3.5 Said subdivision improvements shall be completed, according to the terms of this Agreement, within the construction schedule appearing in Exhibit "B" . The Board of County Commissioners, at its option, may grant an extension of the time of completion shown on Exhibit "B" upon application by the Applicant subject to the terms of Section 6 herein. 4.0 Release of Liability: Applicant shall indemnify and hold harmless the County from any and all liability loss and damage county may suffer as a result of all suits, actions or claims of every nature and description caused by, arising from, or on account of said design and construction of improvements, and pay any and all judgments rendered against the County on account of any such suit, action or claim, together with all reasonable expenses and attorney fees incurred by County in defending such suit, action or claim whether the liability, loss or damage is caused by, or arises out of the negligence of county or its officers, agents , employees or otherwise except for the liability, loss, or damage arising from the intentional torts or the gross negligence of the county or its employees while acting within the scope of their employment. All contractors and other employees engaged in construction of the improvements shall maintain adequate workman's compensation insurance and public liability insurance coverage, and shall operate in strict accordance with the laws and regulations of the State of Colorado governing occupational safety and health. 5.0 Off-Site Improvements Reimbursement Procedure: The subdivider, applicant, or owner may be reimbursed for off-site road improvements as provided in this section when it has been determined by the Board of County Commissioners that the road facilities providing access to the subdivision are not adequate in structural capacity, width, or functional classification to support the traffic requirements of the uses of the subdivision. 5.1 The subdivider, applicant, or owner shall enter into an off-site improvements agreement prior to recording the final plat when the subdivider, applicant, or owner expects to receive reimbursement for part of the __ct of ti+o nff-cite imnrnvamants 5.2 The off-site improvements agreement shall contain the following: The legal description of the property to be served. The name of the owner(s) of the property to be served. A description of the off-site improvements to be completed by the subdivider, applicant, or owner. The total cost of the off-site improvements. 2 9;1249 The total vehicular trips to be generated at build-out by the subdivision, or resubdivision, as specified by the ITE Trip Generation Manual, or by special study approved by the Board of County Commissioners. A time period for completion of the off-site improvements. The terms of reimbursement. The current address of the person to be reimbursed during the term of the agreement. Any off-site improvements agreement shall be made in conformance with the Weld County policy on collateral for improvements. 5. 3 If the subdivider, applicant, or owner fails to comply with the improvements agreement, the opportunity to obtain reimbursement under this section is forfeited. 5.4 When it is determined by the Board of County Commissioners that vehicular traffic from a subdivision or resubdivision will use a road improvement constructed under an improvement agreement, the subsequent subdivider, applicant, or owner shall reimburse the original subdivider, applicant, or owner, for a portion of the original construction cost. In no event shall the original subdivider, applicant, or owner collect an amount which exceeds the total costs of improvements less the pro rata share of the total trip impacts generated by the original development. Evidence that the original subdivider, applicant, or owner has been reimbursed by the subsequent subdivider, applicant or owner shall be submitted to the Department of Planning Services prior to recording the final subdivision or resubdivision plat. 5.5 The amount of road improvement cost to be paid by the subsequent subdivider, applicant, or owner of a subdivision or resubdivision using the road improvements constructed under a prior improvement agreement will be based upon a pro rata share of the total trip impacts associated with the number and type of dwelling units and square footage and type of nonresidential developments intended to use the road improvement. The amount of road improvement cost shall also consider inflation as measured by the changes in the Colorado Construction Cost Index used by the Colorado Division of highways. The cost of road improvements may be paid by cash contribution to the prior subdivider, applicant or owner or by further road improvements which benefit the prior subdivider, applicant, or owner' s property. This decision shall be at the sole discretion of the Board of County Commissioners based upon the need for further off-site road improvements. 5.6 The report entitled TRIP GENERATION (Third Edition. 1982) of the institute of Transportation Engineers shall normally be used for calculating a reasonable pro rata share of the road improvement construction costs for all subdivisions or resubdivisions. A special transportation study shall be used for land uses not listed in the ITE Trip Generation Manual. Any question about the number of trips a subdivision or resubdivision will generate shall be decided by the County Engineer. 5.7 The term for which the subdivider, applicant, or owner is entitled to reimbursement under the off-site improvements agreement, entered into between the subdivider and the county, is ten years from the date of execution of a contract for road improvements. 5.8 This provision is not intended to create any cause of action against Weld County or its officers or employees by any subdivider, applicant, or owner for reimbursement, and in no way is Weic County to be considered a guarantor of the monies to be reimbursed by the subsequent subdividers, applicants, or owners. 6.0 Acceptance of Streets for Maintenance by the County: Upon compliance with the following procedures by the Applicant, streets within a subdivision may be accepted by the County as a part of the County road system and will be maintained and repaired by the County. 3 a:1249 6. 1 If desired by the County, portions of street improvements may be placed in service when completed according to the schedule shown on Exhibit "B" , but such use and operation shall not constitute an acceptance of said portions. 6.2 County may, at its option, issue building permits for construction on lots for which street improvements detailed herein have been started but not completed as shown on Exhibit "B" , and may continue to issue building permits so long as the progress of work on the subdivision improvements in that phase of the development is satisfactory to the County; and all terms of this Agreement have been faithfully kept by Applicant. 6. 3 Upon completion of the construction of streets within a subdivision and the filing of a Statement of Substantial Compliance, the applicant(s) may request in writing that the County Engineer inspect its streets and recommend that the Board of County Commissioners accept them for partial maintenance by the County. Partial maintenance consists of all maintenance except for actual repair of streets, curbs and gutters, and related street improvements. Not sooner than nine months after acceptance for partial maintenance of streets, the County Engineer shall, upon request by the applicant, inspect the subject streets, and notify the applicant(s) of any deficiencies. The County Engineer shall reinspect the streets after notification from the applicant(s) that any deficiencies have been corrected. If the County Engineer finds that the streets are constructed according to County standards, he shall recommend acceptance of streets for full maintenance. Upon a receipt of a positive unqualified recommendation from the County Engineer for acceptance of streets within the development, the Board of County Commissioners shall accept said streets as public facilities and County property, and shall be responsible for the full maintenance of said streets including repair. 7.0 General Requirements for Collateral: 7.1 The value of all collateral submitted to Weld County must be equivalent to 100% of the value of the improvements as shown in this Agreement. Prior to Final Plat approval, the applicant shall indicate which of the five types of collateral he prefers to be utilized to secure the improvements subject to final approval by the Board of County Commissioners and the execution of this Agreement. Acceptable collateral shall be submitted and the plat recorded within six (6) months of the Final Plat approval. If acceptable collateral has not been submitted within six (6) months then the Final. Plat approval and all preliminary approvals shall automatically expire. An applicant may request that the County extend the Final Plat approval provided the cost estimates are updated and the development plans are revised to comply with all current County standards, policies and regulations. The improvements shall be completed within one (1) year after the Final Plat approval (not one year after acceptable collateral is submitted) unless the applicant(s) requests that this Agreement be renewed at least thirty (30) days prior to its expiration and further provides that cost estimates for the remaining improvements are updated and collateral is provided in the amount of 100% of the value of the improvements remaining to be completed. If improvements are not completed and the agreement not renewed within these time frames, the County, at its discretion, may make demand on all or a portion of the collateral and take steps to see that the improvements are made. 7 . 2 The applicant may choose to provide for a phased development by means of designating filings of a Planned Unit Development Plan or Final Plat Subdivision. The applicant would need only to provide collateral for the improvements in each filing as approved. The County will place restrictions on those portions of the property that are not covered by collateral which will prohibit the conveyance of the property or the issuance of building permits until collateral is provided or until improvements are in place and approved pursuant to the requirements for a Request for Release of Collateral. 4 921249 7.3 The applicant intends to develop in accordance with Exhibits "A" and "B" 8.0 Improvements Guarantee: The five types of collateral listed below are acceptable to Weld County subject to final approval by the Board of County Commissioners. 8.1 An irrevocable Letter of Credit from a Federal or State licensed financial institution on a form approved by Weld County. The letter of credit shall state at least the following: The Letter of Credit shall be in an amount equivalent of 100% of the total value of the improvements as set forth in Section 6.0 and exhibits "A" and "B" . The Letter of Credit shall provide for payment upon demand to Weld County if the developer has not performed the obligations specified in the Improvements Agreement and the issuer has been notified of such default. The applicant may draw from the Letter of Credit in accordance with the provisions of this policy. The issuer of the Letter of Credit shall guarantee that at all times the unreleased portion of the Letter of Credit shall be equal to a minimum of 100% of the estimated costs of completing the uncompleted portions of the required improvements, based on inspections of the development by the issuer. In no case shall disbursement for a general improvement item exceed the cost estimate in the Improvements Agreement (i.e. , streets, sewers, water mains and landscaping, etc. ) . The issuer of the Letter of Credit will sign the Improvements Agreement acknowledging the agreement and its cost estimates. The Letter of Credit shall specify that 15% of the total Letter of Credit amount cannot be drawn upon and will remain available to Weld County until released by Weld County. The Letter of Credit shall specify that the date of proposed expiration of the Letter of Credit shall be either the date of release by Weld County of the final 15%, or one year from the date of Final Plat approval, whichever occurs first. Said letter shall stipulate that, in any event, the Letter of Credit shall remain in full force and effect until after the Board has received sixty (60) days written notice from the issuer of the Letter of Credit of the pending expiration. Said notice shall be sent by certified mail to the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners. 8.2 Trust Deed upon all or some of the proposed development or other property acceptable to the Board of County Commissioners provided that the following are submitted: In the event property within the proposed development is used as collateral, an appraisal is required of the property in the proposed development by a disinterested M.A.I. member of the American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers indicating that the value of the property encumbered in its current degree of development is sufficient to cover 100% of the cost of the improvements as set forth in the Improvements Agreement plus all costs of sale of the property. In the event property other than the property to be developed has been accepted as collateral by Weld County, then an appraisal is required of the property by a M.A.I. member of the Institute of Real Estate Appraisers indicating that the value of the property encumbered in its current state of development is sufficient to cover 100% of the cost of the improvements as set forth in the Improvements Agreement plus all costs of sale of the property. 5 9:91249 A title insurance policy insuring that the Trust Deed creates a valid encumbrance which is senior to all other liens and encumbrances. A building permit hold shall be placed on the encumbered property. 8.3 Escrow Agreement that provides at least the following: The cash in escrow is at least equal to 100% of the amount specified in the Improvements Agreement. The escrow agent guarantees that the escrowed funds will be used for improvements as specified in the agreement and for no other purpose and will not release any portion of such funds without prior approval of the Board. - The escrow agent will be a Federal or State licensed bank or financial institution. If the County of Weld County determines there is a default of the Improvements Agreement, the escrow agent, upon request by the County, shall release any remaining escrowed funds to the County. 8.4 A surety bond given by a corporate surety authorized to do business in the State of Colorado in an amount equivalent to 100% of the value of the improvements as specified in the Improvements Agreement. 8.5 A cash deposit made with the County equivalent to 100% of the value of the improvements. 9.0 Request for Release of Collateral: Prior to release of collateral for the entire project or for a portion of the project by Weld County, the Applicant must present a Statement of Substantial Compliance from an Engineer registered in Colorado that the project or a portion of the project has been completed in substantial compliance with approved plans and specifications documenting the following: 9. 1 The Engineer or his representative has made regular on-site inspections during the course of construction and the construction plans utilized are the same as those approved by Weld County. 9.2 Test results must be submitted for all phases of this project as per Colorado Department of Highway Schedule for minimum materials sampling, testing and inspections found in CDOH Materials Manual. 9.3 "As built" plans shall be submitted at the time the letter requesting release of collateral is submitted. The Engineer shall certify that the project "as built" is in substantial compliance with the plans and specifications as approved or that any material deviations have received prior approval from the County Engineer. 9.4 The Statements of Substantial Compliance must be accompanied, if appropriate, by a letter of acceptance of maintenance and responsibility by the appropriate utility company, special district or town for any utilities. 9.5 A letter must be submitted from the appropriate Fire Authority indicating the fire hydrants are in place in accordance with the approved plans. The letter shall indicate if the fire hydrants are fl7ovnvionel gna stEra the ._u tc of fire flew tectc_ 9.6 The requirements in 8.0 thru 8. 5 shall be noted on the final construction plans. 9.7 Following the submittal of the Statement of Substantial Compliance and recommendation of acceptance of the streets for partial maintenance by the County, the applicant(s) may request release of the collateral for the project or portion of the project by the Board. This action will be taken at a regularly scheduled public meeting of the Board. 6 9"l.2= 9 9.8 The request for release of collateral shall be accompanied by "Warranty Collateral" in the amount of 10% of the value of the improvements as shown in this Agreement excluding improvements fully accepted for maintenance by the responsible governmental entity, special district or utility company. 9.9 The warranty collateral shall be released to the applicant upon final acceptance by the Board of County Commissioners for full maintenance under Section 5.3 herein. 10.0 Public Sites and Open Spaces: When the Board of County Commissioners, pursuant to a rezoning, subdivision or planned unit development, requires the dedication, development and/or reservation of areas or sites other than subdivision streets and utility easements of a character, extent and location suitable for public use for parks, greenbelts or schools, said actions shall be secured in accordancewith one of the following alternatives, or as specified in the PUD plan, if any: 10.1 The required acreage as may be determined according to Section 8-15-B of the Weld County Subdivision Regulations shall be dedicated to the County or the appropriate school district, for one of the above purposes. Any area so dedicated shall be approved by the County or school district, and shall be maintained by the County or school district. 10.2 The required acreage as determined according to Section 8-15-B of the Weld County Subdivision Regulations may be reserved through deed restrictions as open area, the maintenance of which shall be a specific obligation in the deed of each lot within the subdivision. 10.3 In lieu of land, the County may require a payment to the County in an amount equal to the market value at the time of final plat submission of the required acreage as determined according to Section 8-15-B. Such value shall be determined by a competent land appraiser chosen jointly by the Board and the Applicant. The cash collected shall be deposited in an escrow account to be expended for parks at a later date. 11.0 Successors and Assigns: This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, personal representatives, successors and assigns of the Applicant, and upon recording by the County, shall be deemed a covenant running with the land herein described, and shall be binding upon the successors in ownership of said land. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed on the day and year first above written. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO ATTEST: Weld County Clerk to the Board BY: Deputy Clerk to the Board APPROVED AS TO FORM: County Attorney APPLICANT: BY: (title) Subscried and sworn to before me this _ day of , 19_ My commigion expires: Notary Public 9 ,-1249 7 EXHIBIT "A" Name of Subdivision: Ft . Junction PUD Filing: First Filing South ol and adjacent to weld uountvRoad z4z east of and adjacent Location: to I-25 prent'gn Read Intending to be legally bound, the undersigned Applicant hereby agrees to provide throughout this subdivision and as shown on the subdivision final plat dated , 19_, recorded on , 19_ in Book , Page No. , Reception No. , the following improvements. (Leave spaces blank where they do not apply. ) Estimated Improvements Unit Cost Construction Cost Street grading $ 2 . 50 $ 2 , 500 .00 Street base $ 4 . 80 $64 , 000 . 00 Street pavinv $ 3 .40 $45 , 330 . 00 Curbs, gutters, and culverts $ 6 . 90 $21 , 666 .00 Sidewalk $ 4 . 00 $ 3 , 440 . 00 Storm sewer facilities $15 , 077 .00 $15 ,077 .00 Retention ponds $ 2 . 50 $ 6 , 250 .00 Ditch improvements -- _ Subsurface drainage -- Sanitary sewers -- Trunk and forced lines -- __ Mains -- -- Laterals (house connected) $18 , 830 .00 $18 , 830 .00 On-site sewage facilities -- -- On-site water supply and storage -- -- Water mains $88 , 800 . 00 $88 , 800 . 00 Fire hydrants $ 1 , 800 .00 $ 3 , 600 . 00 Survey & street monuments & boxes$ 4 , 400 .00 4 , 400 .00 Street lighting $ 8,090.00 $ 8,000.00 _ Street name signs -- Fencing requirements $C$,700.O0 6R 700 00 Landscaping ►}5$UU 00.00 50,000.00 Park improvements SUB-TOTAL $400,593.00 Engineering and Supervision Costs (SU $20,030.00 (testing, inspection, as-built plans and work in addition to preliminary and final plat; supervision of actual construction by contractors) TOTAL ESTIMATED COST OF IMPROVEMENTS AND SUPERVISION $ 420,623.00 The above improvements shall be constructed in accordance with all County requirements and specifications, and conformance with this provision shall be determined solely by Weld County, or its duly authorized agent. Said improvements shall be completed according to the construction schedule set out in Exhibit "B" . / / OA J . s4-A-Q/ Signat re of Applicant (If corporation, to be signed by Preside t and attested to by Secretary, together with corporate seal. ) 7. ( / r- / P� , Date: ��jud/ / c? 1993 . ((JJ r 8 , 931249 EXHIBIT "B" Name of Subdivision: Fort Junction REM Filing: First Filing South of and adjacent to Weld County Road 24' east of and adjacent to Location: I 2S FionLagt Road Intending to be legally bound, the undersigned Applicant hereby agrees to construct the improvements shown on the final subdivision plat of Fort Junction PUP Subdivision, dated _ , 19 , Recorded on , 19 _ _ in Book , Page No. Reception No. , the following schedule. All improvements shall be completed within 2 years from the date of approval of the final plat. Construction of the improvements listed in Exhibit "A" shall be completed as follows: (Leave spaces blank where they do not apply. ) Improvements Time for Completion Street grading Spring '94 Mar, Anr, Mav 6 weeks Street base Snring '94 Anr L weeks Street paving Snring fJ4 May z weeks Curbs. gutters. and culverts string '94 4 weeks Sidewalk Fall '94 Z weeks Storm sewer facilities Not Annlicable Retention ponds Snring '94 Mar, Anr, May b weeks Ditch improvements Snring '94 ?tar, Anr, May 4 weeks Subsurface drainage Not Annlicable Sanitary sewers Trunk and forced lines In mace service site Mains In nlace to service site Laterals (house connected) Summer '94 On-site sewage facilities Not Annlicahln On-site water supply and stora¢,e Not Anuli ahle Water mains Snring '94 hngr. lesign, Build b weeks Fire hydrants Summer '94 41Jeexs Survey & street monuments & boxes Street lighting Sumer '94 4 weeks Street name signs Not Applicable Fencing requirements spring '95 L weeks Landscaping Iall '94/Spring '95 S weeks Park improvements Unen Space 4 weeks SUB-TOTAL Site work improvements * S4 weeks to ne Lomnlecett— in 14 month construction time frame The County, at its option, and upon the request by the Applicant, may grant an extension of time for completion for any particular improvements shown above, upon a showing by the Applicant that he above schedule cannot bee met. Signat e of Applicant (If corporation, to be signed by President n at est to by ; ecreia_ together with corporate seal.) 7' Da 19 �J// 3 9 9312/19 EXHIBIT ITEM 9 ROADS/TRAFFIC There will be no public road improvements on the site. All access is by private road to service points and to private parking areas. All on-site roadways and parking areas will be constructed by and maintained by the applicant. No off-site road improvements on Weld County roads are anticipated. Access to the site (PUD) will be from the I-25 east frontage road at two locations spaced at least 500 feet apart. Traffic accessing the I-25 frontage road from the site is expected to be less than that requiring upgrading of the frontage road at the access points. Should future traffic counts at an access point exceed those allowable according to the specific design reference of the standard specifications of the Colorado Department of Transportation, then the applicant will enter into a negotiated agreement to provide the prescribed roadway improvement in accordance with the above-mentioned standard specification. There is no traffic impact on the PUD district by this proposed development. Accesses are directly from I-25 to the initial PUD plan. Based upon the foregoing information , no off-site road improvements on Weld County roads or State Highways are anticipated. As a result it is the applicants conclusion that no separate off-site road improvements agreement is required. The PUD plat filed 2-13-90 required under Note "C" that the future east I-25 frontage road be guaranteed prior to recording the initial PUD plat. Since that date the Colorado Department of Transportation has issued a statement reversing that requirement. The Department of Transportation has now stated that it will handle all of the frontage road construction. It requires only that the property owner dedicate the necessary ROW for the new frontage road. The property owner, or applicant is agreeable to the stated arrangement. Please see letter attached dated May 21, 1993 to Vern Nelson from Teresa G . Jones , Region Development/Access Coordinator, Department of Transportation, State of Colorado. 9 .1249 II EXHIBIT ITEM 16 • m . w CCto W °' I - o W w Z • UD D 0 0 W W = Co Q Z a C W o _ J 0 0 W V) CC Z W/� U LAS z a CC CI W 0 U g • Z U W Tr M 13 0 W cc W p) W N a w rn a w U r O - o_ co J o O) v w 0 ici III `"�• z 0 H U LO D m ah Z }O ZU d ▪ a F CO CC w O W U AA O m 0 w m - 0 --.Exhibit Item 18A COLORADO OF HIGHWAYS ppuctnonaccep(r,ce APPLICATION FOR STATE HIGHWAY ACCESS PERMIT We Instructions: - contact the Department of Highways or your local govdrnmenl to determine your issuing authority. - contact the issuing authority to determine what plans and otherdocuments are required to be submittedwith your application. ply to you)8. all necessary documents and submit it to the - issuing s u complete o authority.Submit bmt questionsaplictiony fort each access requested. Please print or type if youganyqeton application ' - it you have any questions contact the issuing authority. "rein 1750 tilt. �� 1750 h Ave. Greeley Ili t. sap ° 356-6362 Stale a tip Phonon 353 9263 ' �r delay, CO 80631 (�S5e) CO 80631 y i Legal description of property dose ml ac Inn Iow,LnNmp r'^p8W subdivision Junction ' 2 "Weld FC. •UD First Filing I)w wI y feet I.the proposed access grow the neatest mile poet of cross Wean Lest r N g'E W l lrem 250et Check here ll you are tequesting• change in access use L3 new access 0 temporary access 0 impprrovem��existing access 0 9 g v r a If ot lot adjacent properties in which you hem*property interest lot Do you h knowledge any . Highway a p and/or.permit date o yes f3 no If"yes" what are the permit number(s)4 tit Doe the properly owner own Or have any interest'in any adjacent roeyll of Ft. Junction POD O yes 0 no It"yes' - please describe; Owns all 12) Are there flitting or dedicated public ettee's.toads.highways dr*Cons easement,bordering Or within the property? 8 yes ❑ no If"yes"- list them on your plans and Indicate the proposed and existing access points. 1]) II you are reeuetllog commetiat or indu,ltlal access please indicate the types nd number of busineeeee and provide Ma Soot area square ee laolape teenage of each? 1"ot•pa businessbnaln..e squire Dean Yost Colo. Dept. of Transportation ISIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 1 you ate requesting •now many wunnucnes ern Greeley, CO 806320860 IC) n quefnn agricultural acne and number of Onus 1st II ye are requesting residential developmen access.•whaWme type(single iamily.•p•rtmenl.townhouse) number el units units type allilliiiiiiiiiiiiiiillailISIM type number of 161 Maid* the tellle Count fOomatel lot ehIicl eVehicles ththat will use the access. Leaving propeny then (Morning is two counts.Indicate it lowing det your low•k heW lialialliiiiallew0y Ilan. lit Check with the lanain tie which et the leiiewing dorumen(ar•map Indicating othere the acco4vborderin9 roads and street'. (plans be no larger than 24'5]6•) • .,g.K W propeely fad satins design. at Highwey and driveway plan and profit.'S` ep Popose emean ownership Mope Including easements. cap Map end plmNewlnplmncy lo the Mpnwty onnrd Mier it Signing andstrip•n CI Mep•�hitters in detailingVt rlonOon>belote and altar hi a'pninpond>I striping plans. subdivision. imam in ing.lode the p plan. g Proof of',ability® $VOdiYlfiOn.zoning.or development plan. permitted access not consistent with the terms and conditions listed on the permit may be considered a violation of I1 an access permit is issued to you it wilt state the terms and conditions for its use,Any changes in the use o the the permit. AND ANY OTHER TH THAT PAERJURY URY IN THE SECOND PONDI DEG EE AND FORM HER APP ICAPABLE ST DECLARES UNDER PENALTY AF PLLJ INF R ATE NPDED ON APPLICABLE C E FEDERAL LAWS, SUBMITTED ATTACHMENTS ARE TO THE BEST OF THEIR KNOWLEDGE TRUE AND COMPL• ETE. Applicant Signature II the applicant is not the owner of the properly.we require this application also to be signed by the property owner or their legally authorized representative (or other acceptable written evidence).This signature shall constitute agreement with this application by all owners-ol-Interest unless stated in writing.If a permit is authorized,the property owner will be listed as the committee. Dale COON Soon•1'r 'miteeeeeloase monad...e.om,vpp an.n5'O•tC 1r e 911249 ---- Exhibit Item 1811 1 was amt COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HID,. ..Y • APPLICATION FOR STATE HIGHWAY ACCESS PERMIT eppticallon a. ,Arica at. Instructions: - contact the Department of Highways or your local government to determine your issuing authority. - contact the issuing authority to determine what plans and other documents are required to be submitted with your application to you)S, all necessary documents and submit it to the -complete this form(some questions may not apply Y 1 rydocumnfs and Issuing authority.Submit an application for each access requested. r type -it you have any questions contact the issuing authority. ilikilailinSill 1 ■ava•tadares,.city. Ste. 520 nreaudann.17 Greeley 822 7th St., 1O 6 Ave. T P!5°3 356-6362 amass. CO 80631 Pl ) 353 92G3 eed°re'S CO 80631 ) al 4pamoc,iplron el.roped. umion2 lownanipCB "Taw ceuntrWeld •u Dm•1an :!Y?' First fling 4t. Junction riasismiliOP . el CI;hem II you are uauelling now access ❑temporary access ❑ improvement to existing access ❑ change in access use .y>lpwwN S* v D P eti hate II properly 10) DoywMre knowledgeIf ot any'yes' a what Highway accost permits and/or,permit date ❑ yes �.I no If"yes" - wheal are the permit number(s)? • Ill Dose he properly owner own or have any'Morelli lawn adl•unt property') b yes 0 no II yes' - please describe: Owns ell of Ft. Junction PUD 12) Ate Ines*cabana or dedicated public eveets.coeds.highways or access easements westing or within he property, FJ yes 0 no If"yes"- list them on your plans and Indicate the proposed and existing access points. tat Il you are regue•eng commercial or induStrlal•cease plena Indicate the types and numbi GI bmines•es and provide Me floor area equate loeuae alurnt business square loons aqua..lool.ga business Dean Yost e. De1 7k pt.Pre-release Center Colo. Of Trans.ertation • NI II you m requesting agriculturalagriculturalfield access .how Manracres will access same? Greeley, CO 80632-0850 15) II you are requesting residential development access,-what la the type(Single limits,.apartment,lownheufe)and climbed el units? ryes type numbs'of units number of units IIIIIIIIIIISIIISSMIIII CM II 1a1 ymdcome!allowingpeek hosisvolu s0 oralerge vehicles Matuse Me access.Leaving DmpeaylMyiMp returning �Iwo eaunU.IrM- youryourec' volumes daily volumes O. •iliiii laiiiiiiial ments ate required to 17) (plans should beIssuing larger then 2C a ae,1 lo�which L9p/!-T llowing doeuPraperty map Indicating otherComplete scouts,bordering roads application. end sheets. al H• Ptoposed access design. 1 Highway and drivewayplan andMemotile. Pascal and ownenMP maps including eeseme^le. Tyr Dapandeensdewiligtaamcuto sWoel and alter ltry. hi signing end striping plans.el Map and alon IIstyloutiomb.lae and Trellis cannel Alen deSubdipman,in along e el .neatrighl- plan. I) Meal of liability insurance 8 subdivision.zoning,or development plan.II an access and conditions or s use. y use of the permitted access n is issued to ot consistent you thtthelterl tms and conde the itions ons listed on thfe perm t may nbe considered aes In violation of the permit. THE APPLICANT DECLARES UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY IN'THE SECOND DEGREE,AND ANY OTHER SAPPLICABLE STATE OR FEDERAL LAWS, THAT ALL INFORMATION UBMITTED ATTACHMENTS ARE TO THE BEST OF THEIR KNOWLEDGE TRUOE AND COMPLEVIDED ON ITE. iiiS applicant is not the owner of the property,we require this application also to be signed by the I forty owner or theirlegally all owners-of-interest unless stated In writing.II a permit: llhorized.the their authorized representative (o] other acceptable written evidence).This signature all constitute agreement with this application the property owner will be listed as permillo9. COOK n.m en ] ppd.,..•.hound me r..a....mneee ma O.v..a.nw. • 1 ) :12 9 49 Exhibit Item 19A NELSON ENGINEERS 822 7TH STREET GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 (303) 356-6362 August 6 , 1993 Job 314 Rural Ditch Company Attn: Lee Gould, Jr. 12148 WCR #13 Longmont, CO 80504 RE: Fort Junction P.U.D. Dear Sir: A developer is in the process of purchasing the captioned parcel of land from the New Creation Ministries. At present, the purchaser is preparing the final plans for the first filing of the north 22 acres of Fort Junction P.U.D. He is required to notify ditch companies of any intentions and to demonstrate that the plans do not affect your ditch. The accompanying plan shows that the first filing is approximately 900 to 1, 000 feet north of the Rural Ditch. Further, natural drainage is north and away from the ditch. No site runoff will be discharged into the ditch as a result of this development and there are no plans to grade the farmland between the ditch and the first filing of Fort Junction. If there are any questions, please contact our office. Very truly yours, 01' - Arthur F. Uhrich AFU:pa Enclosure 9;3.1249 rxhibit Item 20A GEOLOGICA. DATA Geology The proposed site is located within the Colorado Piedmont section of the Great Plains physiographic province. The Colorado Piedmont, formed during Late Tertiary and Early Quaternary time (approximately sixty-five million (65,000,000) years ago), is a broad, erosional trench which separates the Southern Rocky Mountains from the High Plains. Structurally, the property lies along the western flank of the Denver Basin. During the Late Mesozoic and Early Cenozoic Periods (approximately seventy million (70,000,000) years ago) , intense tectonic activity occured, causing the uplifting of the Front Range and the associated downwarping of the Denver Basin to the east. Relatively flat uplands and broad valleys characterize the present-day topography of the Colorado Piedmont in this region. The site is overlain by alluvial deposits of Modern Time. The alluvial deposits are underlain by siltstones and claystones of either the Pierre, Laramie or Fox Hills Formations. The contact of these three formations underlie the site. No bedrock outcrops were encountered at the site, and the bedrock was encountered below the alluvial gravels at depths ranging from nineteen (19) to twenty-one (21) feet below the surface. The regional dip of the bedrock in this area is anticipated to be relatively flat and in an easterly direction. Seismic activity in the area is anticipated to be low; therefore, from a structural standpoint, the site should be relatively stable. Due to the relatively flat nature of the site, geologic hazards due to mass movement, such as landslides, mudflows, etc. , are not anticipated. With proper site grading around the structures and adequate drainage for streets and paved areas, erosional problems should also be minimal. The property lies within the drainage basin of .the St. Vrain Creek but according to Rocky Mountain Consultants, Inc. , does not lie within the one hundred ( 100) year floor plain of the creek . 9: 449 `iibit Item 2OB Therefore, the site should not be subject to extensive flooding by St. Vrain Creek. # The property is underlain by a layer of sand and gravel. Approximately # three (3) to five (5) feet of overburden material overlies the gravel, and the # gravel layer extends to the bedrock below at depths of nineteen (19) to twenty- * one (21) feet. In general, the sand and gravel material encountered consists of hard, durable fragments suitable for use in construction materials. Geologic conditions at the site are such that, in our opinion, the site is not underlain at economic depths by coal, limestone or quarry rock. Radiation hazards at the site may be higher than normal rates in the area due to the fact that the site is underlain by sand and gravels. The sand and gravel is composed of igneous and metamorphic rocks derived from the mountains to the west and may contain uranium-related minerals. A detail study of radon gas or radiation hazards at the site is beyond the scope of this report. It is suggested that a more detailed study be made prior to construction to more accurately determine radiation hazards at the site and make recommen- dations regarding remedial actions if needed. Site Grading & Utilities It is recommended that the topsoil containing roots and organic matter, which extends to a depth of approximately four (4) to six (6) inches, be removed from the area of the proposed building. This topsoil should be stockpiled for future landscaping use. The subgrade should then be scarified to a depth of six (6) inches and recompacted at or near optimum moisture to ninety percent (90$) of Standard Proctor Density ASTM D 698-78. (See Appendix C. ) On-site soils or granular soils approved by the geotechnical engineer are suitable for use as fill in the proposed building area. All fill underlying 9,71249 T' 'hibit Item 20C building and pavement areas should be placed in layers not exceeding eight (8) inches in thickness and compacted at or near optimum moisture to a minimum of ninety-five percent (95$) of Standard Proctor Density ASTM D 698-78. In computing earthwork quantities, an estimated shrinkage factor of. eighteen percent (18$) to twenty-three percent (23$) may be used for the on-site clays compacted to the above-recommended density. A shrinkage factor of fifteen percent (15$) to twenty percent (20$) may be used for the on-site sand used as compacted fill. Utility trenches dug four (4) feet or more into the upper subsoils should be excavated on safe slopes. All piping should be adequately bedded for proper load distribution. Backfill placed in utility trenches in open and planted areas should be compacted in uniform lifts at optimum moisture to at least ninety percent (90$) of Standard Proctor Density ASTM D 698-78 the full depth of the trench. Backfill placed in utility trenches under building and paved areas should be compacted at or near optimum moisture to at least ninety-five percent (95%) of Standard Proctor Density ASTM D 698-78. Addition of moisture and/or drying of the subsoils may be needed for proper compaction. All fill should be inspected by the geotechnical engineer and field density tests should be taken under the supervision of the geotechnical engineer to verify that the specified compaction requirements are attained in the field. 9211249 Exhibit Item 20B-a SOIL SURVEY WELD COUNTY, COLORADO UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE IN COOPERATION WITH COLORADO AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION SC 1.249 a4F]' yeti. 4." [a;:ei-47.l' v a 82 -,,17":15,1t4-4 1 82 82 L Cr,"'•1 384 I ;' 1, 61 y4 , `p 83 81 1 c 1' 61 36 , '74 .l est _.., 34 • .w" 61 35 i . "" masy.earga I 16 r_'.r r4af. r \ n • 40-14'r 4 ' 6l 15 i T`R'�t :�-y,� er Y ,._ > .L„,„4 . 8+1'.;x4 82 15 l ' _ l. "_ FE« Y\ z 65 65 - M� ti VINE �.d.. n„// 3 1 a,�—/ y;.f .. m 3 'I .. . M�c �.,, .rdr 'ni01 ‘4'.'./�\- $• ,, f l.ttr ` .CNMkc. �---+> C.:- 1,21,s, co '' '- Z .1] - 3 .<S4 (.� `^. ,fir 16 59 r','. A �� f. �t A r ,_ ,. x �., r .water I rS, __"t�y5; 1: , 274.., tLyt ; !'�L'!,'• \\`\\."llll *:' - 3 wal /�(� #k3,, l v� n' .fw� n. ".:J 4, illt WI.IC Z ' r$iFYrq' •rt , f ♦ �t.+t J I ,l />y ;- +- ♦�s �,ae moil•, \',� Ji ,43 t t 1t !j} _ Yy 1` , IAL+•�! \�,� .• rl.'rtr .i � _ ,$) L 4: ci/1, 4 4 .'76 4 • i1 w 4 1 a 1 4 Y t /• lanai 0 !e .��, • :,-' •i t tile" aY. ,--t- C 7 -: err . Ai '.r." ( 76 F T _ \ 4 • F / • t 4n' r 4 I 27 8 e 'r 77 ,[e n 7, 10 t N 48 ` 6n -. i j - N vj - '1 76 :L�p • '�� Ip $l I r' r _ N � 9f'_ �' • n Pce 4 F p 14 1� • 52 < / �� n • t it a�.4 U �" ' e a °! 4\ f y 47 eN •�� 47 . . 27 5.0-- �. \1. '' xS1 I i-J,i, , �/ n try l:. fie'/ fit Yl ■■ r�•. b 1� . 76 ♦TS.i. 4g ; of r0j� / �F ° I [ )` '`.,j '..-.• � 77 .I 1- 7,7„, ® .x ;'2.. ''48 • 47 ^.76.lk f'I t ? n: ti 77 1'1 '77 2 3 `�} to /� / � �if y� i. 1 q�j// .\r F 31s _ •� rr •.7. rY �xr ai:;J' h tk . 76 'aF 37 L {, V k • .{; 3851 1 �C77 n 14 l�'�. 3Vc /) 3A.'.dyY*"y76 �,$(� ✓ ^1+' ,A 76 ). so/L •y, ry�C77 r" < * 11 ' C.✓ r 40 -iq I� L f�+✓7,� I. a w UC'q �x I, TK. �' 6i`>1s14 y �y A---4-029 • . e I�-` ,.v , '_ 1- x 9� �.x 57 • . fo13�,� f . F r. y iia l �� '•"fr•W4Y� a,/ r ?,* •14. 4 8, _ .. ix_._b_L 1Lew _Uli SOIL SURVEY s g. GO percent of the unit.La vnstshrubs, and trees growl l well. Capability subc s colored surface layer, q which make up about 35 percent. About 5 Its m percent is Aquepts and Bankard sandy loam.2 Altvan loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes. This is a eep, These are deep, poorly drained soils that formed in well ained soil on terraces at elevations of 4,500 t 4,900 recent alluvium. No one pedon is typical. Commonly the h or soils have a feet. formed in old alluvium ngare small areas offs ils that kaline loamy orttled,clayeylldly surfacealine layero moderately al- and underlying show ncluded in ding show ev cote of poor drainage. Also included e small, material and are underlain by sand or layer ind and nvel long and arrow areas of sand and gravel depos . within 48 places they have a gl Typicall the surface layer of this Altvan so is grayish underlying material. ng. The water brown loa about 10 inches thick. The subs it is brown • Most of the acreage is subj table is at or near the surface early in spring and recedes and light ye owish brown clay loam and sa y clay loam about 14 inch s thick The substratum is a reous loamy to as deep as 48 inches late in fall in some years. sand about b l5 i ches hick over le elly a Some small se ls are areas have been reclaimed by major for rangeland and wildlife dhabitat. ra drainage Permeability h e and available water capacity are and leveling and are used for irrigated crops. moderate. The festive rooting depth i 0 40 inches. The potential native vegetation is dominated by alkali Surface is is edium,and the erosi hazard is 1psv' sacaton, switchgrass, and western wheatgrass. Saltgrass, This soil is u almost entirely for irrigated crops. It is suited to all cro commonly grow in the area, includ- sedge, rush, and alkali bluegrass are also prominent. bee beans, alfalfa, mall grain, potatoes, potential production ranges from 3,000 pounds per acre in ing onio sugar psystem is 3pounds in unfavorable years. As and onions. An exam e of a suitabl cropping favorable years to 2,000 to 4 years of alfalfa ollowed by corn, corn for silage, range condition deteriorates, the switch grass, alkali sugar beets, small or bea s. Land leveling, ditch sacaton, and western wheatgrass decrease and saltgrass lining, and installing pip lines m y be needed for proper sedge, and rush increase• water application. Management of vegetation should be based on takinf All methods of irrigati suitable, but furrow ir- half and leaving half of the total annual production. Seed rigation is the most comm . arnyard manure and com- ing is difficult and costly because numerous tillage prac mercial fertilizer are needed or top yields. tices are required to eliminate the saltgrass sod Windbreaks and environ ntal are ns of trees and $�vitchgrass, western wheatgrass, alkali sacaton, tal shrubs commonly grown i t e area generally well wheatgrass, and tall fescue are suitable for seeding. They suited to this soil. Cu 'yeti n to control competing can be seeded into a clean, firm seedbed. Seedbe< vegetation should be tinu for as many years as preparation usually requires more than 1 year t possible following planti g.Tees t are best suited and eliminate the saltgrass sod. A grass drill should be usec have good survival ar Rocky Mo ntain juniper, eastern Seeding early in spring has proven most successful. redcedar, ponderosa p e, Siberian m, Russianolive, and .Wetland wildlife, especially waterfowl, utilize this unit hackberry. The shru s best suited a e skunkbush sumac, The wetland plants provide nesting and protective cove) lilac, Siberian peash b, and America plum. as well as some food. The nearby irrigated croplan< This soil can nlpr ace habitat leme to that t, highly where wildlife obtain much of their food and find prote( pheasant, cotton- al,suitable for mourn' nd wildlife Su includin p tive cover, makes this unit valuable to both wetland an tail, and mourn dove. Such crops as heat, corn, and openland wildlife alfalfa provide suitable habitat for o nland wildlife, Openland d w wildlife, especially pheasant, use this unit fc undisturbed espesb ph nt. Tree and shrub lannlangs and cover and nesting. Deer find excellent cover in som sting cover would enhance Penland -wit- areas. dlife populati ns. These valuable wildlife areas should be protected frog This rea n soil elo me to good chief limiti i for urban fire and fenced to prevent encroachment and overuse h and u re or rout development. The h n g soil tea- livestock.They should not be drained. tares for rban development ilsitwets are the dries ands ll poten- These soils have good potential as a source of sand ar• fiat ef t subsoil as it and dries and e rapid ravel. Capability subclass VIw; Salt Meadow range site gravel substratum Septic g ley perm ea ity of the sand and 4- oils and A ue is flooded. This ne tank ab urption not contain function nugh but inpla es the map unit is ' epressions in smooth plain d along tI subst turn does not contain enough fines toit pr rly bottoms of nature ainageways th ghoul the surv< filter the bs,leachate.an Sewage lagoons require se ling. colored surface lay( Law s, shrubs, and trees grow well. Capability sub ass area. Aquolls, which ha a d e unit. Aquepts, whi, make up about 55 perce o Ile r . 3—AA p aollrils and A ucnts ravel! substratum. This have a lighter cold suiis soils that at up about : ell drain' nearly level map unit is on bottom lands and flood plains percent. Abo percent of all the major streams in the survey area. Aquolls, and soil at have sandstone or shale within 48 i es which have a dark colored surface layer, make up about ill rface. 90.1249 IxliiHIt It (,n HU)li— , SOIL SURVEY 100 TABLE 6.--BUILDING SITE DEVELOPMENT ictive featusrc d in he ry.(Some teohextt fort definitions -ofh"slighte,„t"moderate," and r"severe." Absence ofaan entry emeans t soil l was not See not• rated) Dwellin s Small Local roads Soil name and Shallow Dwellings with g commercial and streets map symbol excavations without basements basements 1 buildings C 1, Severe: Moderate: Moderate: . ;Moderate: Moderate:2 Altvan cutbanks cave. shrink-sw ell. shrink-swell. ; shrink-swell. shrink-swell,action. Severe: Severe: aka Severe: Severe: floods, A wills Severe: floods, floods, q floods, wetness, floods, wetness. wetness. wetness. wetness. frost action. Severe: Severe: Severe: floods, floods, Sflood: Severe: floods, floods, Aquentsfloods, wetness. wetness, wetness. wetness. wetness. frost action. Severe: yr Severe: Severe: Severe: ;Severe: floods, pquollsfloods, ; floods, floods, wetness, floods, • wetness. wetness. ; wetness_ wetness. frost action. : Severe: Severe: Severe Severe: Severe: floods, Aqueptsfloods, floods, floods, wetness, floods, wetness. wetness. wetness. wetness. frost action. Slight Moderate: Moderate: ;Moderate: Moderate: , t5 low strength. low strength. ; low strength. froaction lows strength. Ascalon ;Moderate: ;Moderate: • Slight Moderate: Moderate: frost action, 6• low strength. low strength. : slope, Ascalon low strength. ; low strength. Slight Moderate: Moderate: :Moderate: Moderate: ; 8, 9 low strength. low strength. : low strength. froaction lows tstrength. Ascalon Severe: Severe: floods Severe: Severe: Severe: floods. 10 Bankard cutbanks cave, . floods. , floods. floods. Slight Slight Moderate: 11,Bresser12 Slight Slight frost -action. Moderate: C Moderate: Moderate: Severe: slope. 13 Severe: slope. slope. ascaJo cutbanks cave, slope. small stones. Slight Moderate: lu, 15 Slight Slight Slight low strength. Colby Moderate: Slight Moderate: 16, 17 Slight Slight slope low strength. Colby . 18°: wndarata- Moderato: Colby Slight S1'_�ht Slight_ slope. low strength. Moderate: Moderate: Slight Moderate:l wModerate: low strength- Adena low strength, low strength. low strength. slope. Sec footnote at end of table . 9Z.1249 J.__t1iL i L 1 I. Lin 20li—,. SOIL SURVEY 104 • TABLE 7.--SANITARY FACILITIES (Some of the terms used in this table to describe restrictive soil features are defined in the Glossary. See text for definitions of "slight," "moderate," "good," "fair," and other terms used to rate soils. Absence of an entry means soil was not rated) Area Daily cover Trencabsorption Soil name and Septic tank Sewage lagoon Don sanitary l sanitary for landfill map symbol areas landfill __land landfill fie lds -- -------- Severe: Severe: Slight Fair: 1 Z Slight thin layer. Altvan seepage. seepage. 3I: Severe: Severe: Poor: Aquolls Severe: Severe: .wetness. floods, floods, floods, wetness. wetness. wetness. wetness. Severe: Severe: Severe: Poor: Aquents Severe: floods, floods, wetness. wetness. floods, wetness. wetness. wetness. L'' Severe: Severe:, Severe: Poor: Aquolls Severe: floods, wetness. , wetness. floods, floods, wetness. wetness. wetness. Aquepts f Severe: Poor: S f floods, floods, lood: Severe: Severe: wetness. wetness. loods, f wetness. wetness. wetness. 5 6 Slight Severe: Severe: Severe: Good. -seepage. -seepage. seepage. seepage. Severe: Good. 7 Slight Severe: Severe: seepage. Ascalon slope, seepage. seepage. Slight Severe: Severe: Severe: Good. 8, 9 seepage. seepage. seepage. Ascalon Severe: Severe: Fair: Severe: Severe: floods. too sandy. 10 floods, floods, Bankard floods. seepage. seepage. Severe: Severe: Good. 11, Slight Severe: seepage. Bresser seepage. seepage. Severe: Severe: Poor: 13 Moderate: Severe: seepage seepage. small stones. slope. slope, . Cascajo seepage, small stones. 14 15, 16 Slight Moderate: Slight Slight Good. seepage. Colby 17 Slight - Severe: Slight Slight Good. Colby slope. 18': Slight Slight Good. Slight Severe: Colby slope. Sli ht Good. Adena Moderate: Moderate: Slight g percs slowly. seepage, slope. Moderate: Good . 19 Moderate: Severe: Moderate: Colombo floods. fl oods. floods, floods. 20 Slight Moderate: Slight Slight Good . Colombo slope, seepage. See footnote at end of table . 9Z-1249 iiN Iii 65 ; ! 1 I'nl _'fl!s SOIL SURVEY 108 TABLE 8.--CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS ive res ned the ry.(Some of texttfortdefinitions this "poor,' antic"unsui led.^eaAbsencerof antentrynmean means soilawas not rated) Roadfill Sand Gravel Topsoil Sail name and map symbol Fair: Fair: ,Good Fair: thin layer. I, 2 � excess tines. excess fines. Altvan Fair: ,Poor: j•: ;Poor: :Good excess fines. ; wetness. Aquolls ; wetness, ; frost action. Fair: ;Poor: ;Poor: ;Good excess fines. wetness. Aquents ; wetness, ; frost action. :Unsuited Poor: q A ;Poor: ;Unsuited wetness. quolls wetness, frost action. 1 Unsuited Poor: ;Poor: ;Unsuited wetness. Aquepts ; wetness, : frost action. ;Fair: Poor: Unsuited Good. 5 6, 7, 8, 9 ; low strength, excess fines. Ascalon ; frost action, ; shrink-swell. Unsuited Poor: Bankard ;fair: Fair: too sandy. 10 ; low strength. excess fines. B Fair: 'Poor: Unsuited 11 12 Fair: small stones. frofrost action. excess fines. Bresser Poor: t3 Good Good Good small stones. Cascajo Unsuited Good. ,fair: Unsuited iN, 1y. 16. 17 ; low strength. Colby 184: Unsuited Good. {Fair: Unsuited Colby ; low strength. Unsuited Fair: ;Fair: Unsuited too clayey. Adena low strength. Fair: 19, 20 Fair: Unsuited Unsuited------------- too clayey. Colombo low strength, frost action. ;Good Fair: 21 , 22 Good Good too clayey. D ac 2no :Unsuited Good. Unsuited 23, 24 Fair: , low strength. Fort Collins ;Unsoiled ,Good. Fair: Unsuited gaverson low strength. ;Unsuited ;Poor: Poor: Unsuited too clayey. 27 Ueldt shrink-swell , Ile low strength. ' See footnote at end of .table. 97 '1249 Exhibit l tem :or SOIL SURVEY 124 TABLE 72.--ENGINEERING PROPERTIES AND CLASSIFICATIONS (The symbol < means less than; > means greater than. Absence of an entry means data were not estimated] Classification Frag- Percentage passing --Soil name and Depth; USDA texture ments sieve number-- Liquid Pies- map ticity symbol ; Unified AASHTO > 3 map inches -4 10 1 40 200 index Pet Pct — In 0-10 Loam CL-ML ,A-4 0 g0-too:85-100 60-95 50-75 20-30 5-10 1, 2 t0-25 Clay loam, loam CL lA-6, A-7 0 95-100:95-100 85-100 70-800 35-50 15-25 Altvan 0 75-95 ;70-90 25-35 25-60 Sand and gravel SP, SP-SM;R-1 3': --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---pquolls 8-60 VaniabgeNP V0-60 Sand, gravelly SP, SP-SM A-1 0-10 .60-90 :50-70 30-50 0-10 sand. Aquents 0-48 Variable --- --- --- --- 30-50 --- NP -- 48-60 Sand and gravel ;SP, SP-SM A-1 ; 0-10 60-90 50-70 0-10 4x_ y ___ ___ ---- --- --- ---pquolls 0-60 Variable . Aquepts 0-60 Variable -- --- 0-8 Sandy loam ;SM ;A-2, A-4; 0 95-100;90-100 70-95 25-50 15-25 ; -NP-55' 6, 7 8-18 Sandy clay loam ;SC, CL ;A-6 0 95-100190-100 80-100 40-SS ; 20-40 10-20 Ascalon 18-60 Sandy loam, ;SC, ;A-4, A-6 0- 95-100;95-100 75-95 35-65 ; 20-40 5-15 sandy clay SM-SC, loam, fine CL, sandy loam. CL-ML , 0-8 Loam SM A-2, A-4 0 95-100 90-100 70-95 25-50 15-25 NP-5 8, 9 8-18 Sandy clay loam SC, CL A-6 0 95-100 90-100 80-100 40-55 ; 20-40 10-20 Ascalon 18_60 Sandy loam, SC, A-4, A-6 0 95-100 95-100 75-95 35-65 20-40 5-15 sandy clay SM-SC, loam, fine CL, sandy loam. CL-ML --- NP 0-4 ;Sandy loam SM A-2, A-4 0 95-100 90-100;60-70 30-40 --- NP 10 , 0-5 70-100 60-100;40-70 5-25 ; 9ankard 4-50;FSre sand, sand, SP-SM, SM A-2, , gravelly sand. A-1 A-I, A-2; 0 95-100 75-100;35-50 20-35 ; 15-25 NP-5 11 ,Dr12ess 6-t5,Sandy cam SM0 95-100 75-100;50-70 30-50 � 30-55 10-25 Dresser 16-25 Sandy clam loam SC AA-6 A-7 25-30 Sandy loam, ;SC, SM-SC A-2, A-1; 0 90-100,60-100 30-60 20-30 ; 25-35 5-15 coarse sandy loam, -gravelly sandy loam. A-t 0-5 80-100 35-85 20-50 5-10 ; 20-30 5-10 30-60 Loamy coarse SP-SC; A-2, sand, gravelly loamy sand, very gravelly loamy sand. 0-9 Gravelly sandy GM A-1 , A-2 0-15 50-65 50-60 15-4 0 10-35 1 --- NP 13 loam. _-_ NP Cascajo 9-31 Very gravelly GP-GM, A-1 0-15 15-50 15-50 5-30 0-20 sandy loam, GP, CM very gravelly loamy sand, very gravelly NP sand. 0-15 ,10-60 10-GO 5-30 0-10 ; --- 31-60 very gravelly GP, SP, A-1 loamy sand, GP-6M, very gravelly SP-SM sand, gravelly sand. See footnote at end of table. 92 .249 i Lxl.l'biL Item 2UB—ii WELD COUNTY. COLORADO, SOUTHERN P....T 129 TABLE 13.--PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF SOILS he ce actor (T)(The profile` m eans lesAbsences oft ann entryemeansr data r werennotT availablenorowerennotf is for the entire estimated] : Risk of corrosion Erosion Wind factors erodi- wate Soil name and Depth Permea- Available Salinity Shrink-` :Uncoated Concrete bility map symbol bility reaction potential : steel K : T _group_ capacity In In/hr In/in Mmhos/cm 0-10 0.6-2.0 0.20-0.24 6.6-7.8 Low 'Moderate Low 0.24: 3 5 1, 2 10-25 0.6-2.0 0.15-0.17 7.4-8.4 <2 Moderate Moderate Low 0.28: Altvan Moderate Low 0.70; 25-60 >20 0.02-0.04 T.4-9-0 <2 Lou 347 -- --- --- --- - --- '--- --- Aquolls 0-48 High Moderate 48-60 >20 0.04-0.06 7.4-8.4 2-16 Lou Aquepts 0-48 Moderate --- 48-60 >20 0.04-0.06 7.4-8.4 2-16 ,Lou High Aquolls Aquepts 0-60 <2 Low Low Low 0.17 5 3 5, co 8, 9 0-8 0.6-6.0 0.11-0.16 6.6-7.8 <2 Moderate Moderate Low 0.24 Ascalon 8-18 0.6-2.0 0.13-0.15 6.6-7.8 18-60 0.6-6.0 0.11-0.15 7-9-8.4 <2 Lou Moderate Low 0.24 Moderate Low ,0.10 5 ; 3 10 0-4 2.0-6.0 0.09-0.12 7.4-8.4 <2 Low Moderate Low 0.10 Bankard 4-60 6.0-20 0.05-0.08 7.4-8.4 <2 ,Lou Lou Lou Lou 0.10 5 ; 2 11, 12 0-16 0.6-6.0 0.11-0.13 6.1-7.3 Low Moderate Low 0.15 Bresser 16-25 0.6-2.0 0.15-0.18 6.6-7.3 --- Low Lou Low 0.10 25-30 0.6-6.0 0.10-0.13 6.6-7.3 Low Low Low 0.10 30-60 2.0-20 0.05-0.08 6.6-7.3 --- Moderate Low 0.10 5 : 8 13 0-9 6.0-2.0, 0.07-0.09 7.4-8.4 <2 Low Moderate Low 0.10 Low Cascajo 9-31 6.0-20 0.05-0.08 7.4-8.4 <2 Moderate Low 0.10 311-60 6.0-20 0.05-0.06 7.4-8.4 <2 Lou 0.37 5 4L Moderate Lou 14, 16, 17 0-7 0.6-2.0 0.20-0.24 7.4-8.4 <2 :Low Moderate Low 0.37 Colbyby 7-60 0.6-2.0 0.17-0.22 t7-0.22 7.4-8.4 <2 ;Lou 18•: Moderate Low 0.37 5 uL Colby 0-7 0.6-2.0 0.20-0.24 6.6-8.4 <2 ;Low Moderate Low 0.37 7-60 0.6-2.0 0.17-0.22 7.4-8.4 <2 :Low <2 ;Low Moderate Low 00.34 5 5 Adena 0-6 0.6-2.0 0.18-0.21 6.6-7.8 <2 High h High Low 6-9 0.06-0.2 0.16-0.18 6.6-7.8 <2 ,{ligh Low 0.32 9-60 .0.6-2.0 0.16-0.18 7:4-8.0 <2 ;Lou ;High Low 0.32 5 5 19, 20 0-14 0.6-2.0 0.14-0.18 7.4-8.4 <2 :Mow Low 0.28 . Colombo 14-21 0.6-2.0 ,0.14-0.16 7.4_8.4 <2 Moderate :High Low 0.28 21-60 '0.6-2.0 0.14-0.16; 7.V-8.4 <2 ;Law High0-12 0.2-0.6 0.19-0.21 6.6-7.8 <2 ;Moderate Moderate Low 0.24 3 5 21 , o22nHigh Low 0.24 Dacono ,21-27 0.2-0.6 0.13-0. 7.4-8.4 <2 :High Low 0.15 27-60 0.2-2.0 0.13-0.18 7.4-8.4 <2 ;Moderate High Low 0.10 27-60 >20 0.03-0.05 7.4-8.4 <2 ;Low <2 ;Low Moderate Low 0.20 5 6 23, 24 7_7 0.6-2.0 0.16-0.20 6.6-7.8 0.20 Fort Collins 7-11 0.6-2.0 ,0.16-0.11 (2 ;Moderate Moderate Low 8 7.4-8.8 7ii-GO0 0.6-2.0 ;0.16-0. 18 7.4-8.V <2 ;Low High Low 0.20 High Low 0.28 5 4L 25, 26 0-V 0.6-2.0 ;0.14-0.18 7.4-8.4 <8 ;Low :High Low 0.28 Ilavercrson 4-60 0.6-2.0 ;O.1V-0.18 7.4-8.4 <8 ;Low g V 0-60 0.06-0.6 0.12-0.17 7.9-9.0 <8 :High ;High High----- 0.28 5 27, 28 Veldt . See footnote at end of Cable. 931239 ExhiLLL i.Lrn ._01. i 132 SOIL SURVEY . TABLE 1V.--SOIL AND WATER FEATURES (Absence of an entry indicates the feature is not a concern. See Crt for descriptions of symbols and such terms as "rare," "brief," and "perched." The symbol < means 'ass than; > means greater than] Flooding High water table Bedrock Potential Soil name and li logic; map symbol logic; Frequency Duration Months Depth Kind ;Months Depth Hard-ness action group ; Ft In --- >6.0 --- --- >60 --- Moderate. 1, 2 B ;None --- Altvan ; 3.. Aquolls D ;Frequent----;Brief Apr-Jun;0.5-1.0 Apparent Apr-Jun >60 7 --- High. Aquents D ;Frequent----:Brief Apr-Jun 0.5-1.0 Apparent Apr-Jun >60 --- High. V.: Aquolls D ;Frequent---- Brief Apr-Jun0.5-1.5 Apparent,Apr-Jun >60 High. Aquepts D ;Frequent---- Brief Apr-Jun:0.5-1.5 Apparent;Apr-Jun >60 --- ;High. 5 6, T. 8, 9 0 ;None ___ --- >6.0 --- 1 --- >60 --- ;Moderate. Ascalon --- --- >60 --- ;Low. 10 A ;Frequent---- Brief Mar-Jun >6.0 Bankard B None --- >6.0 --- ; --- >60 --- Moderate. 11, 12 --- , Bresser 13 A None -- --- >6.0 --- --- >60 --- Low. Casc ajo 14, 15, 16, 17---- 6 None --- >6.0 --- ; --- >60 --- Low. Colby 18*: ; ___ >60 ___ Low. Colby E. None --- --- >6.0 --- .- u' Adena C None --- --- >6.0 --- ___ >60 --- Low. ➢ Rare --- >6.0 --- --- >60 --- Moderate. 19, 20 --- Colombo >6 0 --- ___ >60 --- ;Low. 21 , 22 C None --- --- Dacono 23, 24 8 ;None to rare --- --- >6.0 --- --- >60 --- Low. Fort Collins ➢ y_ --- --- >60 --- Low. 25, 26 :Rare to Brief Ha Sep >6.0 Haverson ; common. --- >6.0 --- --- >60 --- Low. 27 28 C ;None --- Heldt 29, 30 A :None --- --- >6.0 --- --- >60 --- Moderate. Julesburg 31 , 32. 33, 3N----; ➢ ;None --- _-_ >6.0 --- ___ >60 --- Low. Kim 35.: --- Moderate. Loup D :Rare to Brief Mar-Jun ..5-1.5 Apparent Nov-nay >60 common. Boel A ;Occasional Brief Mar-Jun 1.5-3.5 Apparent Nov-may >60 --- Moderate. 36'. >6.0 --- ___ 10-20 Rip- Low. Midway D ;None -'- --- pable See footnote at end of table. 901249 N N \ - > t GN N , t, ®� N � � � N 0 3 L I 3 � / O Cts)N— r- I 21 \ 1 . \\ ` _ _ 0 \ 1 -f l q r okiF - � i i-01 ki , Cr L1/4(3z. i I,N:o � ; �D�' �� 11 h ® I ` oo g go�` a • l h � � �� , c z r. a� ° � ; R \9 .v0 QN At-1,11Q Q ? O m � � In z N W ka Uo °�frw it �® •ri • ® . ` vii ri l r � Nl .' 0 I.irrci/M . 5 oN) recre3' rtZ1 GEOLOGIC MAPS AND REPORT 9:1249 KEY TO BORING LOGS �� TOPSOIL • GRAVEL R .• SOO FILL .• .`' SAND& GRAVEL �i SILT i SILTY SAND &GRAVEL �i`J CLAYEY SILT a COBBLES . ll 'iiifffl' • !ie- SANDY SILT U SAND,GRAVEL&COBBLES CLAY a -WEATHERED BEDROCK SILTY CLAY _ SILTSTONE BEDROCK i ra SANDY CLAY CLAYSTONE BEDROCK SAND • •• SANDSTONE BEDROCK �•�! SILTY SAND Inn LIMESTONE (��I "" CLAYEY SAND : R GRANITE SANDY SILTY CLAY SHELBY TUBE SAMPLE STANDARD PENETRATION DRIVE SAMPLER WATER TABLE 48 hrs. AFTER DRILLING C HOLE CAVED 5/17 Indicascs she 5 blows of a 140 pound hemmer falling 30 Inches wee r.Unired 1O penmrale 11"aches A-3 EMPIRE Ln00RATn RIES;fAIC. 9:1249 Exhibit Item 2OD-c LOG OF BORINGS ELe-vATION NO. 1 NO. NO. NO+ • 95 �1 I 3/12,,,.20 , V 2/12 j �, �- �Z- 5/12 90 5/12 5/12E-A 40/12 _ lims1 38/1214%': ill 38 12 _ _ -IIIIII f Ifni BSI kW 18 1 _� -745 12 80 ICI . it31/12 50/12 28/12 75 25/12 ®_ 50 7 -- 40 12 70 lig 5QL5 50/5 65 Note: TDM based on an assumed elevation of 100 feet for the top of concrete irrigation outlet pipe at N.W. property corner of existing house. A-4 EMPIRE L lORATORIES, INC. Exhibit Item 20D-d LOG OF BORINGS 1 ELEvhtION NO.5 NO.G N0.7 N06 v t 95 Try 1/12 . •'. VE, 3 12 C._• . � 41,✓ 90 8/12 � '. o �, • 8tee, .r, • ■✓ex� • • - ' 36/12 -d •- 35/12 v ' O .r .-• a v v, , 85 - ' . . l ,, . a • 35/12 . 0"' 42/12 ' .. 50/12 1 • 80 a . •' �• V. 50 10 75 --- 50/5 -- 70 A-5 EMPIRE L ISORATORIES, INC. a.i *�, Exhibit Item 2011—e LOG Of BORINGS DEPTH fits-7 NGIo 11O.0 Alf,„ i i O �- ✓i -•�• • i_ r r ' •.'I�'-.' . : . '_• • ... ... r• •'._� ��•�••• _ Z off• : .. .i • • . . 5 ., , � . . - • • • •• b`rrr,-�' • • •• z • • , . . '- • •_• 26/12 . r� , • 10 „,-• - I r • •- •'• • ` e .,•. l/%_Pri• .., • ■. - 400•* �- • .� • �� 15 . . ..�■ CC 20 EMPIRE LABORATORIES, INC. 931249 LOG OF BORINGS �L— LL no_is FL_IG . 4 14 . If ✓,i, •47 . 4 •'/✓/ , .• ; . . . .•.�'. • � — ,• ' ••� • . - • .• • • r e., • , •• •. • •. ,•.• •-_• • •• • • .' . • ,. • • • • r _ , •. • •ITIS Aid• L' .• • • . . • • • • • 4' .5 • r • • • • . ••. .- . •. '_ , • 0 •• •• " • • •• r • - •. . r , r .. 4 . 4 .••• EMPIRE LABORATORIES, INC. 9s,r — 24 . ILLUSTRATIONS EXHIBIT ITEM 24A DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS CORRECTIONAL FACILITY Del Camino Pre-Release Center SPACE SUMMARY Living Quarters, 7 pods Main Level 48,160 square feet Upper Level 26,625 square feet Outdoor Court (Six Courts) 6,080 square feet Special Management Main Level 6,364 square feet Upper Level 4,460 square feet Building Security Control 3,045 square feet Intake/Hold/Release 2,500 square feet Administration Main Level Main Level 1,564 square feet Upper Level 6,310 square feet Support Services Main Level 5,872 Square Feet Upper Level 3,970 square feet Gym and Weight Cage/Gym Corridor 7,840 square feet Total Main Level 72,840 Square Feet Total Upper Level 43,870 Square Feet Total Outdoor Courts 6,080 Square Feet TOTAL FACILITY 122,790 Square Feet 91:1249 MINIMUM SECURITY LIVING QUARTERS - 7 Pods, A, B, C, D, E, F, G - 386 Inmates POD A - TYPICAL LAYOUT Lower Level Plan (1) Bath 190 SF (1) Laundry/Janitorial Closet 160 SF (3) 4 Man Dorms @ 240 SF 720 SF (2) 4 Man Dorms @ 260 SF 520 SF (2) Classrooms @ 370 SF 740 SF (2) Classroom Offices @ 80 SF 160 SF (1) Stairtower 280 SF (1) Dayroom 3,620 SF Corridor Common Area/Lower Level 505 SF Main Level Plan (1) Bath 190 SF (1) Laundry/Janitorial Closet 160 SF (3) 4 Man Dorms @ 240 SF 720 SF (2) 4 Man Dorms @ 250 SF 500 SF (1) 6 Man Dorm @ 350 SF 350 SF (1) Classroom @ 300 SF 300 SF (2) Classroom Offices @ 80 SF 160 SF Mezzanine Corridor/Common Area/Main Level 1,409 SF POD A, D, E, F - (6) Outdoor Courts @ 400 SF 6,080 SF Pod A Total 10,684 SF Pod B Total 10,684 SF Pod D Total 10,684 SF Pod E Total 10,684 SF Pod F Total 10,684 SF Pod G Total 10,684 SF 9 .249 Pod H Total 10,684 SF TOTAL ALL MINIMUM SECURITY LIVING QUARTERS 74,788 SF 386 Inmates 230 Square Feet/Inmate SPECIAL MANAGEMENT POD C Main Level 6,364 SF (9) Double Man Dry Cell Rms @ 120 SF 1,080 SF Personal Property Storage 170 SF Lounge 190 SF Shower Room 70 SF Bath/Boiler Room 150 SF Dayroom 2880 SF Laundry 150 SF Inmate/Public Non Contact Visitation 180 SF Corridor/Common 200 SF Janitorial Closet 180 SF Trustees Special Area 545 SF Shift Supervision Office 200 SF Stairwell 250 SF Mechanical Chase 119 SF Upper Level 4,460 SF Bridge Walkway 765 SF (9) Double Man Dry Cell Rms @ 120 SF 1080 SF Stairtower 260 SF Shower Room 160 SF Laundry Room 160 SF Toilet/Bath 160 SF Common/Corridor Space 110 SF Janitorial Maintenance 200 SF Locker Storage Personal Property 385 SF Unassigned Administration Storage 520 SF Communications 70 SF Mechanical Chase 150 SF Trustees Special Space 440 SF 931249 Building Staff Security Control 3,045 SF Main Control 500 SF Sat Control 500 SF Secure Corridor (East) 660 SF Secure Corridor (West) 660 SF Bridge Deck 725 SF Intake/Hold/Release 2,500 SF Sally Port 1 ,020 SF Maintenance Storage 100 SF Vestibule Hold 610 SF VHW Bath 40 SF VHM Bath 40 SF Staff Bath 80 SF Intake Hold - 4 @ 80 SF 320 SF Vestibule Lock 290 SF Administration - Main Level 1,564 SF Vestibule 100 SF Public Waiting 520 SF Public Restrooms (Men/Women) 200 SF Staff Office 120 SF Reception Elevator Lobby 400 SF Private Waiting 224 SF Administration - Upper Level 6,310 SF Vestibule Reception 480 SF Elevator/Equipment Room 100 SF Public Restroom (Men/Women) 160 SF North Office Wing Office One 220 SF Office Two 170 SF Office Three 360 SF Conference Room 450 SF Stairwell 160 SF Central Office Wing Six offices @ 160 SF 960 SF Two Attorney Conference Rooms @ 120 SF 240 SF Two offices @ 120 SF 240 SF Men's Public Restroom 120 SF Women's Public Restroom 120 SF Central Corridor 500 SF 94..')49 South Office Wing Reception Area 150 SF Private Office 1 120 SF Private Office 2 180 SF Private Office 3 180 SF Private Office 4 260 SF Conference Room 260 SF Records Room 540 SF Stairwell 160 SF Central Corridor 180 SF SUPPORT SERVICES Main Level 5,872 SF Medical Unit Med Waiting 210 SF Med Office 100 SF Exam/Treatment 100 SF Dental Suite 100 SF Law Library 290 SF Canteen 290 SF Kitchen Kitchen Food Prep 900 SF Kitchen Dishwash 230 SF Kitchen Storage 1 130 SF Kitchen Storage 2 200 SF Walk-In Cooler 200 SF Walk-In Freezer 100 SF Kitchen Office 100 SF Corridor 1162 SF Maintenance Shop Maintenance Office 160 SF Maintenance Shop 290 SF Maintenance Storage 1 400 SF Maintenance Storage 2 400 SF Electrical Room 310 SF Corridor Circulation 200 SF 93.1249 Upper Level 3970 SF Contact Visitation 1200 SF Contact Visitation 2 580 SF Staff Locker/Break Room 480 SF Corridor (Internal) 180 SF Security Corridor - North 580 SF Security Corridor - South 580 SF Security Corridor - Bridge Deck 370 SF Gym/Weight Cage 7,840 SF Exterior utility court not included in square footage including: -Emergency Power Generator -Loading Dock -Covered Trash Utility Room 921249 EXHIBIT ITEM 248 COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION Del Camino Prerelease Center CONCEPTUAL CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION Basis of Estimate Main Level 72,840 Square Feet Lower Level 43,870 Square Feet Outdoor Courts 6,080 Square Feet Total Square Feet 122,790 Square Feet Sitework Improvement -Sitework -Paving -Fenced Areas -Drainage Sitework -Landscape Building Structure (Outline Spec) ■ Concrete foundation walls to frost depth ■ Concrete building slab; 5" fiberbond concrete or equivalent reinforced slab ■ Superstructure: -Load bearing cmu cavity wall (insulated) -Two level construction; east, south, west elevations -Single level construction; north elevation -Exterior wall height - 12'-0" north building elevation; 24'-0" east, south west building elevations -Steel column post and beam framing -Bar joist/metal deck roof system -Insulation/membrane roofing system (5/12 pitch metal standing seam roof at sally port garage/main building entrance) ■ Interior Walls: -Cmu load bearing in Pod areas -Cmu non-load bearing in support service secure areas -Metal stud/gyp board in administration non-secure support service areas of facility; all walls sound insulated -Cmu firewall separation between central administrative core/minimum security living quarters 90:12. 9 ■ Wall Finish Systems: -Alkyd oil base in administrative/support services/minimum security housing Epoxy in selected high use and wet areas (kitchen, wet baths, laundry) ■ Floor Finish Systems: -Vinyl tile at minimum security living quarters -Epoxy poured flooring at living quarters bath, laundry wet areas, kitchen -Carpet at administration (selected areas) -Paver tile at entry lobby (selected areas) -Sealed concrete at mechanical/electrical/storage rooms ■ Ceiling Systems: -Security metal perforated hung ceiling minimum security living quarters -Acoustical tile at administration -GDW at support services -Tectum (Hung grid sound absorbing acoustical tile) at gym area only ■ HVAC Heating/Cooling: -Code Design: R-19 Wall System R-30 Roof System -Gas fired rooftop units -Minimum 17 zones ■ Plumbing: -Standard porcelain fixtures in minimum security living quarters, Pods A through H -Combo units only in Inmate Hold -Fire protection sprinkler system - Complete facility ■ Building Specialties: -(2) Hydraulic Elevators, 2500 # capacity; 2-level service 14' travel distance -Full service kitchen layout -Kal-Wall; gym window wall -Site fencing to DOC standards -HVAC purge system ■ Electrical: -Main distribution system as required -Standard and Security Fixtures -Specialty Systems -EPG (Emergency Power Generator), Transfer Switch Circuit, Transfer Circuit 9;31249 25 . UTILITIES 9L:12.19 exhibit Item 25B-a leg EST" COMMUNICATIONS August 12 , 1993 Bley Associates Loren Bley 2020 Clubhouse Dr. Greeley, Co. 80634 Dear ML . Bley This is in regards to the Del Camino Prerelease Center at I25 Frontage and Weld County Road 24-1/2 . I have reviewed the site plans and have no problems. U S West will provide telephone service to this development. If I can be of further assistance please call me on 441-7161. SLLcerely & p(1�--� off(/" Dennis L. Smith Manager 1855 S. Flatiron Ct Boulder. CO 80301 901249 // Exhibit Item 25B-b cS nnV2t. ` ain cSanitation ! isttIct (cSalrzb cSan) [ltlephone 5107i[t/ ATUMc (303)776-9570 August 3, 1993 I]onsmont,CC 80501 Mr. Loren Bley Bley Associates - Architects 2020 Clubhouse Drive Greeley, Colorado 80634 Re: Del Camino Pre-Release Center Property - Commitment to Serve Dear Mr. Bley: This letter is in reference to the following described real peoperty: W/2 of the SW/4 of Section 2, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. Referenced property can be served. The District's trunk line is available along the East perimeter of said property to serve the planned Pre-Release Center. St. Vrain Sanitation District has 1852 SFE (single family equivalent) taps, of which 303 have been purchased, resulting in 1549 available for purchase. These taps are available to referenced property and other eligible properties on a first-cone, first-serve basis. As the present supply of taps is consumed, the District plans to increase the size of its treatment plant to serve 5,555 SFE taps. These additional taps would also be made available an a first-cane, first-serve basis. The above-referenced property is eligible to utilize the available supply of taps an a first-cane, first-serve basis, subject to the following: a. Installation of off-site trunk and/or an-site laterals and camection to the District's system by the applicant; b. Execution of a Service Agreement; c. Purchase and payment of the required number of taps; and d. Compliance with the District's Rules and Regulations. Should this property wish to obtain an absolute commitment to serve, taps may be prepurchased and held until needed. Monthly service charges will be assessed upon completion of construction or twelve months after purchase, whichever comes first. Should you have any questions concerning this natter, do not hesitate to contact me. Very y s, ST I ITATI0N DISTRICT L. D. Lawson, P.E. Manager LDL:mcj cc: Nelson Engineers 321 249 -Exhibit Item 25B-c /� Rocky Mountain Natural Gas ROCKY A Division of K N Energy,Inc. MOUNTAIN 323 5th Street NATURAL GAS P.O. Box 437 Frederick,CO 80530-0437 LIMY (303)833-2588 Bley Associates Architects Loren Bley 2O2O Clubhouse Drive Greeley , CO 80634 RE : Del Camino Pre-Release Center - Utility Service Dear Mr . Loren Bley Rocky Mountain Natural Gas Division of KN Energy Inc . will be able to fill all requirements for natural gas service in this proposed development. We currently have a 3" distribution main on the east side of the East I-25 Frontage Road. There will need to be at least a 1O ' utility easement from the Frontage Road to the service utility court . On the plan provided me , I can not see utility easements drawn in . I will have no problem signing the Mylar , providing there are easements for utility . Respectfully , JiLLIk92i David L. Blaylock District Manager 9 A'.49 Exhibit Item 25B-d KITED POWER UNITED POWER, INCORPORATED P.O. BOX: 929, BRIGHTON, CO 80601 TELEPHONE: (303)659-0551 It 1-800-468-8809 FAX(303)659-2172 August 10, 1993 Mr. Loren Bley Bley and Associates 2020 Clubhouse Drive Greeley, Colorado 80634 Dear Mr. Bley: SUBJECT: Del Camino pre-Release Center United Power is aware of the proposed pre-release center to be located at Del Camino. I have reviewed the site plan and have a basic understanding of the electrical requirements of the facili- ty. United Power is ready, willing and able to provide electrical service to the proposed facility. It would be our intention to provide all the electrical requirements of the facility. If you or Weld County Planning have any additional questions, please let me know. Sincerely, UNITED POWER, INC. Bill Meier I-25 District Representative BM/cs A CONSUMER OWNED UTILITY 931249 Exhibit Item 25B-e `"°°"r"'" MOUNTAIN VIEW FIRE PRO . £CTION DISTRICT Administrative Office: n .lj s 700 Weaver Park Road • Longmont, CO 80501 e t 8 (303) 772-0710 Metro (303) 666-4404 I■L e VIEW August 9, 1993 Mr. Loren Bley Bley Associates 2020 Clubhouse Drive Greeley, CO 80634 RE: Del Camino Pre-Release Center - Utility Service Dear Mr. Bley: The proposed site for the facility is within the boundaries of the Mountain View Fire Protection District. Fire protection service to the facility will be provided by this Fire District. The utility plan, undated, which was sent to the Fire District has been reviewed for compliance with the adopted codes and standards of the District. Per our agreement on the telephone today, I have calculated the required fire flow as 1500 gallons per minute at 20 pounds per square inch for this facility using the following criteria: 1. The building will have a total floor area counting first and second floors„ and mezzanines of less than 128,700 square feet. 2. The building will be of Type I or Type II Fire Resistant Construction as defined by the Uniform Building Code. 3. The building will be sprinklered throughout by an automatic sprinkler system complying with the requirements of N.F.P.A. Standard 13, Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems. 4. The building will be detected throughout by a smoke detection system. The fire alarm system will be remoted to an approved monitoring point. Del Camino Pre-Release Facility-Utility Plan 1 of 2 Station 1 -Station 2 Station 3 Station 4 Station 5 Station 6 Station 7 .9119 Cmy Line Rd. 10971 WCR 13 P.O.Box 575 P.O.Box 11 10911 Dobbin Run P.O.Box 666 P.O.Box 40 Longmont,CO Longmont,CO 299 Palmer Ave. 8500 Niwot Road Lafayette,CO 600 Briggs 100 So.Forest St. 80501 80504 Mead,CO 80542 Niwot,CO 80544 80026 Erie,CO80516 Dacono,CO80514 a:1249 49 Exhibit Item 25B-e If these criteria change then the required fire flow will need to be recalculated. If the water system as shown will provide the required fire flow, then the water system is approved. Documentation will be needed from the design engineers. Hydrant locations as shown will be approved. There is an area on the east wall within the fenced yard that is not reachable within 650 foot of a hydrant by line of travel. However, the standpipe system inside the building will be usable in lieu of installing an additional hydrant and associated mains around the east side of the building. The design of the access roads, as shown, meet the standards of the District, as long as the roads will support 60,000 pounds imposed load. Chief Ward, Chief of the District, would like to meet with the representatives of the owner to discuss other issues with them. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, ��. Charles E Boyes Fire Prevention Specialist CC: Jerry Ward, Chief of the District William N. Bailey, Deputy Chief, Support Services Mark A. Lawley, Assistant Chief, Fire Prevention Del Camino Pre-Release Facility-Utility Plan 2 of 2 931249 Exhibit Item 25B-f OWe CENTRAL WELD COUNTY WATER DISTRICT August 10, 1993 Art Uhrich Nelson Engineering 822 7th St., Suite 520 Greeley, CO 80631 Re: Del Camino Pre-release Center Utility Service Dear Mr. Uhrich: Transmitted herewith is a copy of the "can serve" letter dated August 10, 1993 to Mr. Coppom, Administrator of The Villa. The letter should meet the county requirements for Central Weld County Water District providing water service for The Villa. Transmitted also is a red line drawing of the utility certification sign-off, indicating some of the Districts requirements. Please update the sign off sheet with the appropriate changes prior to District signature. The minimum pipe size The Villa will be required to fund is 12 inch. Pending Board approval The District may increase the 12 inch to 24 inch for future transmission capabilities. Because of the monetary involvement, I assume the District will select the engineer for design, contract representation, bidding, construction, etc. for the project. I have also included a copy of a letter from The Engineering Company with specific engineering data at the proposed site. The District will await your response for further discussion pertaining to tap size, location, fee, etc. 2235 2nd Avenue • Greeley, Colorado 80631 • (303) 352.1284 • John Zadel, General Managr7 1.249 Jj Exhibit Item 2SB-f If you have any further questions or I can be of assistance please contact the office at 352-1284. Sincerely, CENTRAL WELD COUNTY WATER DISTRICT 442de General Manager cc: Weld County Planning Bley Associates John T. Coppom, Administrator Enclosures 9;1249 Exhibit Item 25B-g CW4 CENTRAL WELD COUNTY WATER DISTRICT August 10, 1993 John T. Coppom, Administrator The Villa 1750 6th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 RE: Water Service Dear Mr. Coppom: This letter is in response to a request for water service to serve the following property described as follows: SEE LEGAL DESCRIPTION ATTACHED Water service can be made available to the above described property provided all requirements of the District are satisfied, including easements where required for District facilities. Central Weld County Water District requires that contracts be consummated within one (1) year from the date of this letter, or this letter shall become null and void unless extended in writing by the District. Very truly yours, CENTRAL WELD COUNTY WATER DISTRICT dn W. Zadel General Manager JWZ/eaj cc: Weld County Planning Bley Associates 2235 2nd Avenue • Greeley, Colorado 80631 • (303) 352-1284 • John Zadel, General Manage 249 Exhibit Item 2SB-h RECD AUG _ 9 1993 te 51 ° August 6, 1993 FILE: 93-014 Tap Request Central Weld County Water District 2235 Second Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 A l l ENTION: John Zadel Manager Dear John: As requested, we have analyzed the tap request for the proposed Pre-Release Center to be located north of WCR 24 at I-25. It is our understanding the facility will contain 300 beds and that the Fire District has determined the Needed Fire Flow to be 1,500 gpm at 20 psi. Assuming an average usage of 100 gallons per inmate per day as reported in the literature with a max-day demand of 500 gallons per inmate per day and a peak-hour demand of 750 gallons per inmate per day, the estimated flow rates are 21 gpm average, 104 gpm on the max-day, and 156 gpm during the peak hour. The rated capacity of a 3-inch turbine meter is 350 gpm which should be more than adequate; however, before the final size is determined, an analysis of the proposed fixture units should be done. The District's system in this area is fairly strong and should be able to supply a peak flow rate of 1,800 gpm at a residual of 60 psi through a 12-inch line to the facility. In a fire situation with a 12-inch line, the available fire flow should be in the neighborhood of 2,400 gpm at a residual of 20 psi. This does not include the losses through the fire hydrants; and, therefore, the actual flow rates will be somewhat less. However, this is well in excess of the Needed Fire Flow of 1,500 gpm. We analyzed the proposed facility using an 8-inch line and determined the available fire flow to be approximately 1,700 gpm. However, at that rate with an 8-inch line, the velocities in the pipe will be over 9 feet per second which is nearly double the generally accepted value of 5 ft/sec. This high velocity would cause water hammer problems in the system. Therefore, a minimum 12-inch line should he required for the facility. If you have any questions regarding this analysis, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, 910a07-0 Thomas F. Ullmann, P.E. Principal The Engineering Co. The Engineering Co. 2310 East Prospect Ft.Collins,CO 80525 Phone(303)484-7477 FAX(303)484-7488 914a 6. 27 . DRAINAGE 9412 49 Exhibit Item 27A NELSON ENGINEERS 822 7TH STREET GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 (303)356-6362 August 4, 1993 Mr. Michael Brand The Villa 1750 6th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 RE: Fort Junction P.U.D. Dear Mike: We have completed our drainage study on the 22 acre parcel of Fort Junction in which you plan to develop approximately 12 acres into a pre-release center. The proposed site is located in the west half of the southwest quarter of Section 2, Township 2 North, range 68 West in Weld County, Colorado at the southeast intersection of the East Frontage Road of I-25 and Weld County Road No. 24 1/2. The purpose of this study is to determine the size of detention ponds required, if any, for 100-year storm water runoff under a fully developed condition on your site. The Rational Method as outlined in the Urban Storm Drainage Manual , Volume 1, prepared by the Denver Regional Council of Governments, has been used to determine peak runoff rates. The runoff quantities, detention pond volumes , and discharge rates are shown on the accompanying calculations. The Fort Junction site in general has poor drainage from south to north. The approximate W 1/2 of the 22 acres will be developed into a pre-release center with a 144-car parking lot, an asphalt exercise area , and an approximate one and one-half ( 1 1/2 ) acre building. The remaining area will be in low maintenance grass. The size of the south detention pond ( see Exhibit #1 ) is influenced by the off-site runoff from the south which is comprised of approximately 11 acres. Drainage south of the 11 acres is intercepted by the Rural Ditch and adjacent road ditches. All drainage from the 22 acre site and the area north of the Rural Ditch is currently passed through existing culverts under Weld County Road 24 1/2. That historical drainage pattern will remain unchanged. 9:.1249 Exhibit Item 27B Conclusions 1. The 100-year flood run-off can be contained in ponds of one foot depth on the 12 acre developed site. 2. A special orifice stucture is required at the north detention pond only. 3. No other special drainage structures are required. 4. Runoff at historical rates from the detention ponds will be discharged to the existing culverts and road ditches. Respectfully,l 41 (kidefa----- Nelson,ern C. Nelson, P.E. Enclosure 901249 Exhibl'- iLen 21C 3; • • J— 1, 6f lit ' a3 �—____-- = — t I it Il , RI /AL------1-1147 5 i t . / \ ' 11, i, a�' 1 . . I Irl r \ I I • I t 11 � �n .I \ I s NJ I 1710 r 7 M1 &i .. I4 fi' 1 ....x `'4, 1 .. _. II 7_ II�< I 1 ' Lt I Y I I •• 1 I f 1 � 1I1 i.- el I �I I f ' t 111 fV� I •• V 03 1 'b 1 _ I 11i1�� M 1 ,ors i Nit b \ I i a 1 y I ., 1�. -� o - n n I 5 U I �� P $ • E 3 111' \ p F I `',— \ : o I �o 3 - . i I ' I ' 0 lit --- I I it rr 1 ,/ \ r r l ' ,1 ' 1 ' i' \ v� r Ii lid , ; r: , - I1 -11• r I I\ j :. t ;li \ . . 1 It \\\ I \ " I I \iil I\\ IIII 1 \V\ I L i I tij I I t3 i i t l s 11 \ii \ II a i \\?•,1 \\\I 1 i i I - - -t- i, 1 1 e1}. l' ; DEL CAMINO PRERELEASE CENTER �I I Ii IOE1 I - 25 6 CO HWY 119 _ r w EXHIBIT #1 912:19 L;< �_i�L�1Scli �!!'' pp . - � , I A- __ Joe ,+,,,///0. /�/( ``//77//- M ' Cl., CIO cncutaT10N5 FOR < ,D/ f/�- N1`J• 7 �/ ��N . PROJECT / �, NE �i E�,KJEERS ..04:14--..ATE Z KEO ire DAT£ SREET f or V... -iSTo12(CiL g la O4 F a1zatA.P L7 " l (,S (LSD : 0. 17 c ci/ -+'e et-66R -2 U. (2-(6,•&7‘ -D v t )A Erb o-kA/3 v`-t-k L ) 5 c1 r . m if S I -0-12-9‘ i n14c_-,e -T-O .So L,<<-rd !tea(JD le ,9 Ace on351TE ftisiolztci4-L. lD A,n-e\c-, E TO SemO-, Po(i ::3, -+i(c_ Tv( Ac, ti-c-TZEAGF sT• (7Ra3C'lTo S. ?on)D c I ( 1 Ac. , 1 B At( a aET �, ik-i 5- 1/4.1R , 4- 9 , 11 ><, ( 4-,� Z iTi—c SI D-EJELop -o - 51_©EA -2U(Joi % - So L-`7-14- Q A 0 4'- o . ci Ac 7< o ' 9 0, 7 `17v M r ' \ , z --.Ac_ x 0. 93 ' I , 1f Greenbelt Li Ac x o. t 3 T& . c 4d ` ,c" 373 . g 0 ,79 4-5.5-u,AA -RE-14v_ ge yo(JD Z- (Irs , use 2 kr ( satin s , I 1 C „ G„ A T Q Ai a-k 22444 • 3 r4\nic 2kr- 2-kr, O,-J9 3 12d- 1,-7 -Lc-7a)- liocle, i `- 0.19(5.) z.o,4 = b. ( X3coo --,-- Zo)-6 - (2 .Sx 3coao) _ /304-7 CA LC , +4— a r a silt* 6o J---) 2 - kr-f • 921239 ,_.<tii iii S I t..•ni _' /f. JOB NO. kSNECL NT 1l 'A,�� ULCULAT.ONS FOR Y n F�.- r PROJECT nn ��11 ENGINE DATE CHECKED BY DATE SHEET OF MADE BY II�� - ( 5 u )l (nJ/-FY. (G-YS) 1/Q'14-+3J vO{.( c(3) 3) \ G m1s 6 .(t Ig.-- II,oz3 Ic Rs S 2� 4f.(t /2,4- 14yck 3000 1 ( 2t 30 3.23 9 , 7 I7,4-5(1- 4!-Scco /2,954- 4-0 2 .“) / 5'1Co5' Goc.o / ? /cj So Z.31 GS Zo8© -7Soo 1330 4 2.04- G, / ?Z10 7 9ocao [3, 047 1 Recd A-17- 64 / If. Jet 5J303 u l = //S Q 5I 3 (s 64,o-rye el- it. A = , s/9 2,---(11-7- QGr f, .- , 7 tAs1 /o „i - 9 v1 2= 9 Exhibit Item GiF Jos NO. 31� C+ NT �� + CALCULATIONS FOR Dro)4A 10 PROJECT / NE vs ENGINEERS MADE DV DATE/ '+ GNECKED 8Y OATE SHEET of Fdyr 4/1 a / 7 2( 7- _ /, 3-5 cf5 T(a Al+1671 1 Roo 0.9 4-c . X 0. 9 = 0, Tvr-C 2 Y d -t3 = 1 . Cv4((f 1-,7 x O , 6C 2 , g S, 9 4-((n.i6c (e. rc R_ Asc(AAnN t (�P - irc, e y (d Z (AIL-.6 , tinSQ egAir. ss_crmc_vcA �C �C ORS I +z� +� +� �2>�5 quo 9-z,,6,0 o O,1S 2,o ck 7 /I,M 3a, zgz- eY-t( SG2 2dacf Y(.7 �� 207 ; '-07 °r e,,;•/A) 1/, 513 Sts Chi o. rq_\_, (f2 A f 2 AAA ri-71:7Y I( 931.249 28 . LANDSCAPING SPECIFICATIONS • 931249 28A. SECTION 02932 - SODDING PART I - GENERAL WORK INCLUDED Contractor shall furnish and install fertilizer and sod as indicated on drawings and as specified herein. Contractor shall also provide maintenance as specified. QUALITY ASSURANCE Source Quality Control: Sod materials shall be subject to inspection and approval. The Architect reserves the right to reject at any time or place prior to acceptance, the work and sod which in the Architect's opinion failed to meet these specification requirements. Inspection is primarily for quality; however, other requirements are not waived even though visual inspection results in approval. Sod may be inspected where growing, but inspection at the growth site shall not preclude the right of rejection at the site. Rejected sod shall be promptly removed from the site. Inspection shall be made periodically during sodding, at completion and at the end of warranty period, by the Architect. Inform Architect of intended sod farm prior to cutting for inspection by the Owner. REFERENCES Reference Standards: U.S. Department of Agriculture Rules and Regulations under Federal Seed Act and equal in quality to standards for Certified Seed. SUBMITTALS Certificates - All state, federal or other inspection certificates shall accompany the invoice for materials showing source or origin. File with Architect prior to acceptance of the material. DELIVERY, STORAGE AND HANDLING General - Comply with Section 01600. Sod - Deliver sod properly loaded on vehicles and protected from exposure to sun, wind, and heat in accordance with standard practice SODDING 02932 - 1 9;3;12.49 and labeled in accordance with the Federal Seed Act. Do not drop sod rolls from carts, trucks or pallets. Fertilizer - Deliver inorganic fertilizer to site in original unopened container bearing manufacturer's guaranteed chemical analysis, name, trade name, trademark and conformance to state law. Notify Archi- tect of delivery schedule in advance so material may be inspected upon arrival at job site. Unacceptable material shall be removed immediately from job site. WARRANTY Sod: All sod shall be warranted for two growing seasons to be in a healthy, vigorous growing condition. During the original warranty period, replace at once sod areas that die due to natural causes, etc. or in the opinion of the Architect are unhealthy. Install replacements as originally specified and warranted. PART II - PRODUCTS SOD Colorado grown and shall be a blend of not less than three improved Ken- tucky Bluegrass varieties having a healthy, vigorous root system, with a regularly fertilized, mowed, weed control program providing thick turf, free of objectionable weeds. Each piece of sod will have a sandy-loam soil base that will not break, crumble or tear during sod installation. Sod shall be cut in strips 18" wide, with no more than 24 hours prior to delivery, kept damp on pallets at the site, and laid in place within 24 hours of delivery. FERTILIZER For lawns, after installation of sod, provide fertilizer with not less than 10% available nitrogen and not less than 6% phosphoric acid and not less than 4% potash and there after every 6 to 8 weeks. For soil preparation of sod areas provide Treble Super phosphate which is a soluable mixture of phosphates obtained from treated mineral phosphates with a minimum analysis of forty-five percent available phosphoric acid. PART III - EXECUTION PREPARATION SODDING 02932 - 2 91249 1 . Layout: verify layout of sodded areas as indicated on drawings prior to starting operations. 2. Preparation: Sodded areas shall be free of debris and rocks larger than 1/2" which may hinder sodding. Dispose of accumulated debris at direction of Contractor. Perform fine grading required to maintain drainage into catch basins, drainage structures, etc. as indicated and as required to provide a smooth well-contoured surface prior to proceeding. Clean out inlet structures. 3. Tillage: Apply 10 pounds per 1000 square feet of Treble Super Phos- phate along with soil amendments. 4. Drainage: For ground surface areas surrounding the building to be sodded, finish grade shall maintain a minimum gradient of 6" for a distance of 10' minimum away from the building. Be responsible to assure finished areas of sod are such that positive drainage of storm and irrigation waters will occur and ponding of water will be prevent- ed. Tolerances: + or - 0.04 foot. 5. Adjustment: Adjust all irrigation heads at the proper watering height according to the depth of the sod material but lower than compacted blade height to enable lawn mowers to cut grass freely without damage to the sprinkler system. 6. Approval: Sod will not be laid until the Architect has examined and approved the base preparation. 7. Protection: Be responsible for proper repair of any underground pipe or electrical wiring damaged by operation under this Section. Repairs shall be made by contractors designated by the Owner with cost being charged to this contractor. FERTILIZING 1 . After installation of sod, apply 10 pounds per 1000 square feet of fertilizer composition as specified under Products. SODDING 1 . Sodding: Soil on which sod is laid shall be slightly moist. Sod ends and sides shall be butted tightly together, laid with the longest dimen- sions parallel to contours in continuous rows. Vertical joints between sod strips shall be staggered and compacted by rolling so sod will be SODDING 02932 - 3 9Z1249 incorporated with the ground surface insuring tight joints between adjacent pieces. All rows terminating on the designated property lines are to be cut equal to a straight line. 2. Rolling: When soil and sod are moist, roll sod lightly as soon as possible after it is laid. Delay rolling until just before the second watering. 3. Topsoil: Add along exposed edges to match adjacent grade. Feather topsoil out approximately one foot from edge of sod. WATERING AND MAINTENANCE 1 . Watering: Initially water sod upon completion of convenient work areas until installation is complete and the irrigation system can be operated under full control. Water sod sufficiently to moisten subsoil at least two inches deep in a manner not to cause erosion or damage adjacent finished surfaces. 2. Maintenance: Sod shall be protected and other debris shall be re- moved from the site, and all paved areas over which operations have been conducted shall be cleaned. 3. Fertilizing: Make additional applications every 6 to 8 weeks after sodding. CLEAN UP 1 . Clean Up: Remove pallets, unused sod, and other debris from the site. Clean paved areas over which operations have been conducted. NOTIFICATION AND INSPECTION 1 . Upon completion of work, notify Architect who will make an inspec- tion of the site. If deficiencies exist, Architect will specify such deficiencies to Contractor who shall make satisfactory adjustments and will again notify Architect for a final inspection and acceptance. COMPLETION SERVICES 1 . Operating and Maintenance Data: Submit in accordance with Section 01700. Include directions for irrigation, fertilizing and spraying as required for continuance and proper maintenance through a full grow- ing season and dormat period. SODDING 02932 - 4 9t-'?49 28B. SECTION 02950 - TREES, PLANTS AND GROUND COVER PART I - GENERAL WORK INCLUDED Contractor shall furnish and install plant materials, backfill material and mulching and edging as specified herein and as indicated on the drawings. RELATED WORK Section 02932 - Sodding QUALITY ASSURANCE 1 . Inspection and Approval: Architect reserves the right to reject at any time or place prior to acceptance of, any and all materi- als and plants which in his opinion fails to meet Specifications. Inspection of plants are primarily for quality, size and variety, but other requirements are not waived even though visual inspection at the place of growth shall not preclude the right of rejection at the site. Rejected plants and other materials shall be promptly removed from the site and replaced with suitable specimens. 2. Inspection: All plant materials shall be available at the site for visual inspection prior to installation. The Architect will perform a visual inspection when a minimum of 80% of the plant mate- rials are delivered to the site. REFERENCES 1 . Reference Standards: Plants shall be first class representatives of the specified species or variety, in healthy condition with normal well developed branch and root systems, free of all TREES, PLANTS AND GROUND COVER 02950 - 1 9:1249 objectionable features, and shall conform to the requirements of the American Association of Nurseymen (AAN) for Number One Grade. SUBMITTALS 1 . Certificates: Submit in accordance with Section 01300. In- clude required State, Federal or other inspection certificates with the invoice for plant materials, showing source or origin. File with the Architect prior to acceptance of the material. DELIVERY, STORAGE AND HANDLING 1 . General. Comply with Section 01600. 2. Delivery. (1) Deliver packaged landscape materials to site in original unopened containers bearing manufacturer's information (chemical analysis, name, trade name, trademark and conformance to state law). (2) Plants: Containerized with limbs bound, properly pruned and prepared for shipping in accordance with recognized standard practice. Keep the root system moist and pro- tect plants from adverse conditions due to climate and transportation between the time they are dug and actual planting. (3) Each Plant: Identified by means of a grower's label af- fixed to the plant. The grower's label shall give the data necessary to indicate conformance to Specifications. (4) Remove unacceptable plant material immediately from the job site. 3. Storage: Deliver balled and burlapped stock direct from nursery and heel-in immediately if not to be planted within four hours. Protect roots of plant material from drying out. Store plants in shade protected from severe weather. 4. Handling. (1) Do not drop plants. Do not lift plants by the trunk, stems or foliage. The ball of the plant shall be natural, not made, and the plant shall be handled by the ball at all times. No balled or burlapped plant shall be accepted if the ball is broken or the trunk is loose in the ball. TREES, PLANTS AND GROUND COVER 02950 - 2 931.749 (2) Protect plants at all times from drying out or other injury. Prune minor broken and damaged roots before planting. Major damage shall be cause for rejection as determined by the Architect. PROJECT CONDITIONS 1 . Existing Conditions: Examine and become familiar with the site condition currently under construction. Vehicular accessibility within the site shall be determined by the General Contractor. Repair damage to prepared grounds due to vehicular movement by landscape construction equipment to original condition at no additional cost to Owner. Likewise, conduct cleanup operations to restore ground and surfaces to their original conditions. 2. Sprinkler Systems: Be responsible for proper repair of the sprin- kler system and other underground pipe or electrical wiring damaged by operations under this Section. Repairs shall be made by contractors designated by the Architect with cost being charged to this contractor. SEQUENCING/SCHEDULING 1 . Construction Sequencing: Schedule the plant installation work just ahead of the sodding operation where possible to allow the sprinkler system coverage coincidental with grass watering. However, make whatever interim watering provisions as neces- sary to maintain plants in place until such time as the sprinkler system is completely operational and plant material has been approved and accepted as installed. WARRANTY 1 . Plant Guarantee and Replacement: For a period of two years from date of Notice of Acceptance, and at no additional cost to the Owner, replace any trees or shrubs that are dead, or that are, in the opinion of the Archi- tect, in unhealthy or unsightly condition, or that have lost their natural shape due to dead branches or excessive pruning of dead branches. Inadequate or improper maintenance by the Owner shall not be cause for replacement provided the Contrac- tor shall have submitted throughout the guarantee period a monthly letter of report to the Owner on improper or inadequate maintenance practices and observations. TREES, PLANTS AND GROUND COVER 02950 - 3 9G-4 749 2. Execute replacement planting within ten (10) days of notice to replace such plants. 3. Replacement of Planting: In accordance with the original Speci- fications. Fully restore areas damaged by tree or shrub planting or replacement operations to their original condition. PART II - PRODUCTS PLANT MATERIALS 1 . Quality and Size: Trees shall be fully branched in proportion to width and height. The minimum acceptable sizes of plants shall be as indicated on the drawings. Larger plants than specified may be used, if approved, at no additional cost. 2. Nursery Grown: Plants shall be nursery grown. 3. Containers: Supply trees balled and burlapped and supply shrubs in suitable containers as indicated. 4. Insects, Pests and Plant Disease: Trees and shrubs shall be healthy, free of diseases, insects, their eggs, larvae, or para- sites of any objectionable or damaging nature. Spray conifer- ous trees at time of installation and periodically as required to exclude infestation until final inspection. 5. Plants Required: As indicated on the drawings. PLANT BACKFILL MATERIALS 1 . Manure: Free from lumps, stones and other foreign matter. Free from mineral matter or chemical composition harmful to plant life. Acid reaction 5 to 6 ph. Aged at least one year. Dairy manure. 2. Top Soil: Imported fertile, friable, topsoil. No clods, rocks or organic matter larger than two inches in the greatest dimension shall be allowed for use in planting operations. 3. Fertilizers. Tablets for tree and shrub planting - "The Pill" by Agriform with 20-10-5 analysis, 21 gram size or acceptable equal. TREES, PLANTS AND GROUND COVER 02950 - 4 93'249 4. Peat Moss: Free from lumps, stones or other foreign matter. Acid reaction 4 to 5 ph. Shall contain no less than 60% organic matter by weight on an over dry basis. MULCHING MATERIAL 1 . Bark mulch: Use around all trees: (1 ) Pole peelings made from pine, fir aspen or cottonwood. Chipper chips or other angular bark chips are not accept- able. 2. Gravel Mulch: Use at shrub beds only. 3/4" nominal size crushed gravel. Color shall be a light shade of brown or brown grey. Depth shall be 3" or as otherwise noted. 3. Filter Fabric: Water permeable non-woven fabric, Mirafi No. 140-S for weed control or acceptable equal. SHRUB BED EDGING 1 . Edging: Ryerson steel edging 1/8" thick, 4" deep, 16' length. Steel stakes for supports. Holes punched in edging to allow drainage. PLANT INSTALLATION ACCESSORIES AND MATERIALS 1 . Guying and Staking Material: All trees shall be guyed and staked as appropriate. PART III - EXECUTION INSPECTION 1 . Grades: Verify final grades which have been established prior to beginning fine grading and planting operations. Areas to be planted shall be brought to the lines and grade designated or approved. PREPARATION 1 . Layout: Stake for plant locations and obtain an approval by the Architect before planting holes are prepared. Place all plant material according to the planting plans or as directed. TREES, PLANTS AND GROUND COVER 02950 - 5 9"'1249 2. Interference: Plant placement shall not interfere with the intend- ed sprinkler head coverage, piping or other equipment. EXCAVATION FOR PLANTING 1 . Pits and Trenches: Vertical sides and flat bottom; plant pits to be circular; over-excavated: backfill and compact to match existing fill. (1 ) For trees: Minimum 2' depth from finish grade and in- creased as necessary to accommodate ball roots and at least 6" compacted topsoil below ball or roots. Width: 2' greater than diameter of ball (2) For Shrubs: Depth: Minimum 16" increased as necessary to accommodate ball or roots and at least 6" of topsoil below ball or roots. Width: Minimum 1 ' greater than diameter of ball. PLANTING 1 . Center plant in pit. 2. Face for best effect. 3. Set plant plumb and hold rigidly in position until soil has been tamped firmly around ball or container roots. 4. Use only planting soil for backfill. 5. Place sufficient planting soil under plant to bring top of root ball 1 " below finish grade for deciduous trees, 1 " above grade for evergreens, and flush to ground level for deciduous shrubs. 6. Backfill pit with planting soil until two-thirds full and water each layer thoroughly to settle soil. 7. After soil settle, fill pit with planting soil, water and leave pit surface even with finish grade of surrounding ground. FERTILIZER 1 . Fertilize trees and shrubs by placing fertilizer tablets three inches laterally and three inches below top of root ball as fol- lows: 1 or 1 gallon containers, 3 for 5 gallon containers and 5 for balled and burlapped material. BALLED PLANTS 1 . Place in pit on planting soil material that has been handtamped prior to placing plant. TREES, PLANTS AND GROUND COVER 02950 - 6 9,7,121:9 2. Place with burlap intact so location of ground line at top of ball is same as a nursery. 3. Cut and remove burlap or cloth, ropes, wires and other wrap- ping materials from top one-half of ball. 4. Do not pull wrapping from under ball. 5. Do not plant if ball is cracked or broken before or during plant- ing process. CONTAINER-GROWN PLANTS 1 . Can Removal: Cut cans on two sides with an acceptable can cutter. Do not injure root ball. Do not cut sides on knockout cans. Do not cut cans with spade or ax. 2. Carefully remove plants without injury or damage to root ball. 3. After removing plant, superficially cut edge-roots with knife on three sides. MULCHING 1 . Mulching: Mulch tree planting pits and shrub beds within two days after planting or mulch shall cover the planting pit diame- ter around each tree and shrub. Compact mulch to a depth of 3" unless specified otherwise. Mulch shrub and designated plant beds throughout with gravel mulch to a depth of 3". Mulch shall not be placed until filter fabric has been installed. WATERING Water thoroughly immediately after mulching. Hose down planting ares with fine spray to wash leaves of plants. EDGING 1 . Install steel edger at depth so the top of edger matches the top of curbs, sidewalks and mowed turf areas. When steel edger abuts walks, curbs or walks, cut so the end is straight and rests flush against these surfaces. Stake on both sides. GUYING AND STAKING OF TREES 1 . Stake all trees as indicated on the drawings. (1) Drive stakes 3' into ground at edge of root ball for decid- uous trees; 2'-6" for evergreen trees. TREES, PLANTS AND GROUND COVER 02950 - 7 9. .121 2. Align stakes toward prevailing wind. 3. Tie trees with double strand of guy wire run through an appro- priate length of rubber hose at approximately 4'-6" above finish grade. PRUNING 1 . Prune minimum necessary to remove injured twigs and branch- es, deadwood and suckers. 2. Shrubs: Remove 6" of branching structure on deciduous shrubs to compensate for root shock. PLANT CARE 1 . Replacement: Replace and replant plants damaged by the Contr- actor's operations. 2. Watering: Be responsible for the care and watering of plant material until completion of the project and acceptable by the Owner. Water when soil moisture is below optimum level for best plant growth. 3. Wrapping: Wrap deciduous tree trunks with standard nursery crepe wrap material from ground level to the first limb after pruning. Tape securely at top and bottom. END OF SECTION TREES, PLANTS AND GROUND COVER 02950 - 8 9012X49 PLAT NOTE REQUIREMENTS 9 ,'1C‘ , 9 PLAT NOTE REQUIREMENTS All plat note requirements have been adequately addressed as documented by the following attachments. a) Letter from Weld County Sheriff, Ed Jordan. Exhibit Item A attached. b) Refer to Requirement No. 9 in above response c) Refer to Requirement No. 9 in above response d) Refer to Architects/Engineers Site Plans Al and C3 e) A future vehicular road access point from the twenty-two acre site north property line shall be considered at a future date. Refer to Architects/Engineers Site Plans Al and C3 f) An access easement shall be provided at the north side of the Kahn Sub- division when developed, which will not effect said subdivision. g/h) Refer to Nelson Engineers Addendum Report to Fort Junction traffic impact study - Exhibit Item g/h attached. MasterPlan/Off Site Road Improvements Plat Notes i) Refer to Nelson Engineers Master Drainage Plan for proposed Site Development - Architectural Drawing Sheet C3. j) Refer to Nelson Engineer Response Letter - Exhibit J attached. Refer to letter to Nelson Engineers from Norman Wells, Jr., District Conser- vationist, U.S. Department of Agriculture. k) Refer to Letter from Mountainview Fire Protection District - Exhibit Item K attached. 931249 Refer to Nelson Engineers Site Plan - Architectural Drawing Sheet C3. I) A Site Plan review will be filed in the future. m) Refer to Nelson Engineers' Letter to Rural Ditch Company - Exhibit Item M attached. 931249 PLAT NOTE ATTACHMENTS EXHIBIT ITEM A OF THE Sh, GREELEY OFFICE :" �r'* FORT LUPTON SUB STATION w?. 910 10TH AVENUE j �, i;� P.O. BOX 123 GREELEY, CO 80631 FORT LUPTON, CO 80621 PHONE(303)356-4015 PHONE(303)356.4015 EXT.4690 FAX(303)353-8551 ED JORDAN (303)857-2465 August 18, 1993 Mr. John T. Coppom, Administrator The Villa At Greeley, Inc. 1750 Sixth Avenue Greeley, CO. 80631 Dear John, This letter is in regards to your efforts to establish a pre-parole facility in the Del Camino area. The Weld County Sheriff's Office is responsible to provide routine law enforcement services in that area and we are prepared to meet any demands your facility would require, as per our previous discussions. In my opinion, the area can be adequately covered by the Weld County Sheriff's Office and a separate law enforcement authority is not required to police the Del Camino area. We would certainly be amiable to working out contractual agreements and letters of agreement on a number of details related to the pre-parole facility including: • Law enforcement assistance in the event of a work stoppage or a major internal disruption. • Assistance from our Office of Emergency Management in the development of an emergency response plan for the facility. • Contractual arrangements for regressions from the pre-parole facility, and their impact on the Weld County Jail, and what procedures will be established for moving Department of Corrections inmateslparolees out of our jail and into a state institution. Again, good luck with your proposal. I look forward to working with the Villa and the development of these plans for the facility. Sine y, ED ORDAN �� SHERIFF WELD COUNTY 9-7-1249 EXHIBIT ITEM G/H RECEIVED AUG 2 3 1993 Del Camino Prerelease Center Traffic Impact Study Weld County, CO • • Prepared For : Nelson Engineers 822 7th Street Greeley , Colorado 80631 Prepared By: Eugene G . Coppola P . 0. Box 2600027 Littleton , CO 80126-0027 303-792-2450 I! August 20 , 1993 o, : 1�'* `) I : 921249 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS y Roadway 1 Surrounding Area Traffic Volumes 2 FUTURE CONDITIONS 3 Roadway 3 Surrounding Area 4 Traffic Volumes 4 SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC 5 Trip Generation 5 Site Access 5 Distribution of Site Generated Traffic 6 Impact of Site Traffic 6 DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS 7 CONCLUSIONS 8 90..1 219 INTRODUCTION Del Camino Prerelease Center is a proposed development for the first filing of the Fort Junction PUD . It will be situated on the northern 22 acres of the site . Its precise location is in the southeast corner of CR 24 . 5 and the east I-25 frontage road in Weld County . Colorado ( See Figure 1 ) . The facility will be operational in 1994 . This study addresses the traffic impacts of the proposed facility and specifically reviews and investigates the following items : > Collect and determine current roadway geometry , traffic volumes , and operating conditions . > Determine peak-hour site generated traffic and assign this traffic to the available roadways . > Identify future traffic volumes and roadway condi- tions . > Investigate operating levels-of-service and roadway geometry at site driveways and key intersections . > Determine mitigation measures to lessen the impact of site traffic as appropriate . Each of the above items is discussed in the following sec- tions of this report . EXISTING CONDITIONS Roadway The site is situated in the southeast corner of CR 24 . 5 and the east I-25 frontage road . CR 24 . 5 is a gravel roadway 92:1249 -ttl- 2 d C 4,Terry 11 i MEAD .• ri. 'Lake ,. PI. CR 34 f> • ..�' ' 1 I 1. ; i tile Rd. w I SH 66 McIntosh '...::: : :::: :: ::::: ::y. C. Lake ! �.... :::•:::..:.:::. ::•:.. i .:. -- 3.,OatkIns Lake f, cy :.:::LON3MONT:: ::::•::l`.S:•` ce a/.../.,� `n •�-• ::>;: ;Y....:' • I SH 119 �/ S SITE CR 24 r I �• W ......:fi� F" T Z •CO CC C o' Iz 1 n O ID it U in w • I� : FIRESTONE ≥ Panama j Ili � '�' .'�. 771 o Res. +F1 O 3• .,::f::::, FREDERICK Mineral Rd. �L) SH 52 'i ?"` 1 �� I DACONO `0t. c C. Jdl Jasper Rd. 9 CR 6 N + m E _ ERIE ::::i:i. .t° °' o cc Figure 1 VICINITY MAP 9 1A 49 extending east from the I-25 frontage road . The frontage road presently has one travel lane in each direction and serves approximately 500 vehicles per day . The frontage road intersects CR 24 approximately 100 feet east of the CR24/SH119 intersection with I-25 . The posted speed limit on the east frontage road is 55 miles per hour . County Road (CR) 24 is a two lane paved roadway extending from I -25 to the east . It is a continuation of State High- way ( SH) 119 which runs from I -25 west to and through Long- mont . Currently daily traffic on CR 24 is some 2300 vehi- cles per day . Surrounding Area The site is currently used for agricultural uses as are the surrounding areas . For the most part , the area east of I-25 is used for agricultural purposes or vacant land . Several miles to the west of I-25 lies the City of Longmont . Imme- diately west of I-25 , along the west frontage road , there are commercialized areas including several fast food establishments . Traffic Volumes Recent peak-hour traffic volumes were extracted from the Felsburg, Holt & Ullevig study . That study addresses only afternoon peak-hour conditions . The logic behind this is uncertain; however , it is assumed that the morning peak-hour is minor or insignificant compared to the afternoon peak- hour . Given the activity associated with the business on the west side of I-25 and the lack of development to the east of I-25 , it is reasonably safe to assume morning peak- hour conditions are insignificant . Recent afternoon peak- hour traffic volumes at key locations are presented on Figure 2 . 2 97;1249 0 0 ..r1/ 80 �_20 J f t - 0 `\\ 600 40 �.�145 (13500 SH119 � ( (2300) 380 240 CR24 130 240 190 --e•- M` r 55 Upham / moo O O C1 (xxx) Daily Traffic Figure 2 CURRENT PM PEAK—HOUR TRAFFIC 931249 FUTURE CONDITIONS Roadway Major roadway improvements are anticipated beginning in 1995 . These improvements are represented in the Del Camino Interchange Alternatives Analysis study prepared by Fels- burg . Holt & Ullevig in November , 1991 . The recommended improvements are being implemented by the Colorado Depart- ment of Transportation ( CDOT) . The essence of these im- provements are : 1 . Changing the two-way ramp/frontage road in the southwest quadrant of the interchange to one-way operation. 2 . Construction of a new roadway connecting Turner Boulevard to the on-ramp and the west frontage road . 3 . Relocation of the east frontage road inter- section with CR 24 to a point some 600 feet further east . 4 . Construction of a new east frontage road starting at its intersection with CR 24 and extending some 1800 feet to the north and south. This frontage road will have one travel lane in each direction . Construction activity is anticipated to stop just south of the site . 5 . Spot intersection improvements to provide appropriate laneages for future traffic volumes . At the CR 24 - east frontage road 3 9Z1249 intersection, a through lane and a left-turn lane in each direction as well as a south- bound to westbound right-turn lane will be provided .. Surrounding Area The proposed prerelease center will initiate development in the northeast quadrant of the I-25/CR 24 interchange. Other developments will likely follow . This and other develop- ments have been accounted for in the Felsburg , Holt , & Ullevig study. The development assumptions for that study were consistent with the North Front Range (NFR) Model developed by CDOT. The area surrounding the Del Camino interchange from approximately three ( 3) miles west of I-25 to one mile east of 1-25 and one-half mile each side of SH 119/CR 24 is expected to support substantial development by the year 2010 . traffic Volumes_ As stated earlier , significant development is expected in the area of the Del Camino interchange by the year 2010 . The proposed prerelease center is within the bounds of the Del Camino area and is included in the development projec- tions . Design year conditions identified as those occurring in the year 2010 were evaluated as part of the Felsburg , Holt & Ullevig study . Accordingly , this time horizon is assumed to represent local area build out at the Del Camino interchange. Afternoon peak-hour traffic volume projec- tions , also referred to as design hour traffic volume pro- jections , are shown on Figure 3 . 4 .401171: 0)'39 O O1OO NON"' 30 1425 -210 L �- 485 220 SH119 ..---685 ) C 20 750 1420 -+ J CR 24 755 ---N805 __._ 270 515 f 001.?... 185 Inoue NN N Legend: (xxx) - Daily Traffic Figure 3 2010 PM PEAK-HOUR TRAFFIC 971249 SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC Trip Generation The proposed prerelease facility is a unique land use indig- enous only to itself . Accordingly , the Institute of Trans- portation Engineers ' ( ITE ) , "Trip Generation" publication does not address this specific land use . It does address prison facilities but the data is very limited ( two studies ) and caution is recommended due to the very limited sample size . Anticipated traffic volume projections were developed intu- itively given the estimated 110 employees covering three ( 3 ) work shifts . Administrative employees were assumed to work the daytime and evening shifts with the balance of the employees being security and support services personnel . The following trip end projections appear appropriate during the highest shift change peak-hour : Trip Ends Peak-Hour In Out AM 30 15 PM 15 30 A quick cross reference check with the prison land use presented in the ITE publication revealed that the above trip generation volumes are consistent , if not higher , than the ITE published rates/volumes . Site Access As presently planned , access to the prerelease center will be via two private drives from the east frontage road . 5 3:112.4.9 These driveways are anticipated to receive relatively bal - anced use given the parking layout and building access points . Distribution of Site Generated Traffic The directional distribution of site generated traffic indicates the general path by which access to and from the site is achieved. The location of the project within or in relation to an urban area and the available roadway network are primary factors in determining the overall directional distribution . In this instance , traffic is expected to arrive and depart the site in the percentages indicated below . It should be noted that this distribution recognizes the available road- way system. For example , a vehicle might be travelling to the site from the Denver metro area; however , it must travel east on CR 24 prior to turning north on the east I-25 front- age road . An approximation of this directional distribution of site traffic is shown on Figure 4 . Impact of Site Traffic As previously mentioned, the area surrounding and including the site was assumed to be fully developed when design year traffic volumes were estimated for the Del Camino inter- change project . Accordingly , site generated traffic has been accounted for even though the site was probably antici- pated for use as a higher traffic generator . To as- sess/confirm operations during the 2010 design year , capaci- ty analyses were conducted under PM peak-hour/design hour conditions . Traffic volumes used for these analyses are presented on Figure 5 . As shown on Figure 5 , site traffic volumes and overall traffic volumes on the east side of the 1-25 interchange are relatively moderate . Operating condi- 6 931249 MO a I 1` .-. a r i ` kl- Nak,..., 0/1 r. 7/14 V0 NC NCI 0 N- 8%�6 sq V. In r m �� Q N LO N r N 6\� r o 1/1 C __. 3/6 \.—.. 3/6 r 7/14 '4.---- 13/20 } (7%) 7/4—e. 27/14 ---di I . 13/7 —a— (25%) \,,S\ N N u C O in Legend: AM Pk-Hr/PM Pk-Hr (xx%) = Directional Distribution Figure 4 PEAK-HOUR SITE TRAFFIC 931249 In m O N� O O tL 1/1 re14/14 N f ( N O co O RM\ o� NC- -0/0 15/15 1 ( \coJ m noun O 6UC) \N n 0 f0 r N 1/30 \^ +-6/1425 `6/210 ) \ �- 0/200/465 14/220 '�'" 20/685 ` ` // 4/1420_�, 0/750 J ) 14/270 1 \ f / 0/755 7/805 0/515 1 0/185 — h ,n e,.\)° o OOO • • Legend: xrx/:xx = site/total Figure 5 2010 PM PEAK-HOUR TRAFFIC 9,71249 tions , expressed as levels-of-service ( LOS ) , were calculated as indicated on the following page . Direction- Intersection Movement Control LCS Frontage Rd - Site Drives WB - LT Stop C WB - RT Stop A SB - LT -- A Frontage Rd - CR 24 EB - LT Signal B EB - TH Signal WE - LT Signal A WB - TH Signal C NB - LT Signal C NB - TR Signal B SB - LT Signal B SB - TH Signal B SB - RT Signal B Overall Intersection B As indicated above , all movements are expected to operate at very acceptable levels-of-service under 2010 design peak- hour conditions . It should be noted that traffic signal installation at the CR 24 - Frontage Road intersection was anticipated in the Del Camino interchange study . This signal will be installed when warranted. It should be noted that the traffic signal will be needed whether or not the prerelease center is built . DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS To assess the need for auxiliary lanes at the site drive- ways , the Colorado Department of Transportation publication , "The State Highway Access Code" was reviewed. The results of this review at each driveway are as noted on the follow- ing page . 7 912-49 Required ? South Drive North Drive Improvement Current 2010 Current 2010 RT deceleration lane No Yes No Yes RT acceleration lane No No No No LT deceleration lane No No No No LT acceleration lane No No No No As indicated above , a right-turn deceleration lane is re- quired per the access code for traffic entering the prere- lease facility under 2010 conditions . In this instance , site traffic is considered negligible ; however , background traffic on the frontage road is expected to grow to the point where right-turn deceleration lanes becomes warranted when 100 vehicles per hour are travelling in one direction on the frontage road . When this is likely to occur is somewhat difficult to assess ; however , if growth ( and traf- fic volumes) were to increase in a straight line from 1991 to 2010 , the 100 vehicles per hour threshhold will be reached in 1996 . When constructed , the right turn deceleration lane should be 485 feet long with a minimum taper of 18 . 5 : 1 . Right turn storage is not considered necessary given the minimal site traffic volumes . CONCLUSIONS Based upon the foregoing analyses and investigations , the following conclusions can be made : 1 . Site generated traffic is minimal and is not expected to produce a noticeable reduction in traffic operations . 8 " 9r .Ah;"9 . '* 2 . The proposed interchange improvement at the I -25/SH 119 interchange takes into account significant growth in traffic volumes re- sulting from development on this and sur- rounding sites . 3 . Current traffic volumes on the east side of the i -25/SH 119 interchange are minimal . Accordingly , traffic operations approach free flow conditions . 4 . Under design hour conditions for the 2010 evaluation year ( traffic volumes and im- proved roadway geometry) , all intersections are expected to operate at . level -of-service "C" or better . 5 . Site related improvements are limited to the provision of northbound right turn lanes along the east frontage -road at both site driveways . For ease of use and construc- tion , a continuous right turn lane from the north drive to the south drive appears ap- propriate . From the south drive , the lane should extend 48-5 feet to the south before starting an 18 . 5 : 1 taper to match the exist- ing east edge of pavement . The need for this lane is likely to occur in 1996 if straight line traffic growth causes the directional hourly traffic volumes to exceed 100 vehicles per hour . Given the length of this lane , it may overlap the proposed construction of a new frontage road in conjunction with the I-25/SH 119 project . 9 9T'a Q :1'71 R:�s Accordingly , the design , construction , and timing for the right turn deceleration lane should be fully coordinated. J.0 (] APPENDIX 931249 HC M1'1 t• 1• 1•x K.'*:*�•** `r:Y* t t .t*4.** K* +* K t I t .f.j *K $ i.t "#.*:* 1• t: k* t*;K:# t Y:K't.* # k:.*V: Y'[< ' .k 1 t . INF RMATI N r•`�J-�. .a ; _'•NC ING SPEED . MAJ.;;: _T'i:w r _ - r�. .. !'CPULArI��V 1 0CCO :•3i�.. ..fy7HE _..,.t , , .aim r _ 1 .'. M` _ „T L{ _:F•,i�J�_ NAME Cu- r '; NUR TH1/ .•. .. » .,TREE , ;''.TAC ROAD NAME fF Y7 EGC nm/ia: vv ' '1_k:OD ANALYZE: . . 'vl ,''K t"1�: ..•)�.. _N ' _ . :UN 7PE TYPE MA_ r: c.._' ;::1 :E :.TICN NORTH. '.,O'. TH F E .0 T ..AND TOP TRAFFI ES" WB LE F7- - 15 0 ,. RU - 0 ?._0 85 RIG.: NUMBER OF LANE ES WB NB 5;3 LANE - 9Z1'219 AJUSTMENT :-=ACTORS a:7;-i.- PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB ,RADIUS ( "t i auC e ERAT.:oN LAN:. GRADE ANGLE TOR REGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TARNS \! OR ,--1,.. ...! N 'TH slvl ••i0 :: .CC •:0 _:; `a v`:•\.:.CL_ C t.MP0`_ y.. ION % - U rPU,(_F•.. % COME► '-1 TION AND ;,W .5 VEHICLES T.; ,- o S I•.- RCvI 4E 3CUND ., 0 .J NCR I•HBOUND 0 - ✓ U rf'{BOUNC R I I AL :NAP'S --- ------ ------- TABULAR VALlADJUSTED IGHT Dr T . r INAL J i�:.l DIST . t riD1e 1C-2 ; iAL..'E ADJ r_ ..BEN :, : ;cL ' h'.. MIN!;:F: RIGHT ... W8 6 .S0 , . 50 3 .30 ,, .S.0 MAJOR LEFTS C. 0 .00 B .1 ..J J0 ~•G 0 .00 3 . 50 MINOR LEFTS WB 8 .00 8 .00 0 .00 8 .00 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET SOUTH DRIVE NAME OF rHE NORTH/SOUTH OUT,H STREET -; _;NT.ISE ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS 08-19-19';,3 ; PM P1< HR 201.C OTHER IN I_:F: AT=OM . . . . • 901249 • AND _E V'EL J • i'.Y'i CZ •_! , . l..i • . Ii L. MCVE"`ENT SHARED L E{-;V .. ._,1i'AC I TY _At•'fi...1 i r ✓ a.cah a i"—; 1% _'li %: % ` 274 , . . iT517 _i ,i,' • •r7 MJ2M ..)TREE: ;_EFT 0 765 76,5 765 Fl IDENTIFYING INFGRMAr:ON NAME_ OF THE `AST/WEST STREET SOUTH DRIVE NAME OF THE NORTH/ SOUTH STREET FRONTAGE ROF1L! DATE AND T :NE :JF THE ANALYSI'_ . PM PK HR 20:.C THE? INF;L•RMA T.ON . . . . 3.1249 1.383 Hr !"' : c jGNA;_IZ... -NTriS'.� .. .. N_ r1M,',;:`: SE7ORT v t t ': t* t.:► k.' K I' k..K r#'K't K'k•K-K f.'Y't t' k k.k. k..k k: r t. p 'r t k.K r t.:t k K K 4 K K=K r t.t•K t: t 1 K•t 'K f:r.I P' ..r. < . 'd . __ i.. :uN c - ._MiEA •T FRONIAGE P..:A3 ;'='1'E;-i . Y.'E OTHER . S , .., - JI 1_ 2,;:: i:iECME R' '... .-,) 1S _ -. __ .3 ._ -2 . 3 - .... . ... _. •J _ . r ; - .0 T 12 .3 TP 1 / . 3 7 a-- ' , R7 131 ._.. .. -.. i2 .0.:i r 1Z . .._ .0. ., .... . O 12 12 .0 t r l ' .0 1 `. y ACJL THE JT FACTORS GRADE H4 AOJ P:<G EUS`S PH PE DS RED . BUT . ARR . TYPE y ) t % ) .i/N Nm Nb f/N ':ii�� I = 0 .00 .._ .00 N 0 0 .'=+0 0 N ? .*(3 3 iJ8 0 .00 2 .00 :1 0 0 0 .90 0 N ?2 .6 3 E C. .00 0 0 2 . C N '.) •J , 'C 0 N .2':. . .. ::..GNAL ..L ~ . .N..l.:. �LLE AL •'-1 - ... ...) PH -1 PH w i''h.-'3 PH-4 PI-I-1 PH-3 t'':'. .y ::.,:s L. : X i':: AB LT .< TM X TN X I\•T .♦ ST X PO PD .J6 i T X X '3B L7 X To X rH :C r X R T X PD 5D X GSEr_-N1 . 1r, 0 0 .0 0 .0 GREEN 0 .0 0 .0 -. YEL_-OW 5 .0 5 .0 0 .0 0 .C YELLOW 0 .0 0 .0 5 .0 .,.' (LEVEL OF SERVICE LJ NE GRP . V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP . UELAY APP . _0;> ES L 0 .455 0 .600 c. .3 8 12 .4 T 0 .536 0 .314 15 .5 0 w8 L 0 .03 5 0 .600 4 . 3 A 14 .6 B T 0 .484 0 .314 15 .3 C ;o3 0 . 55 3 .314 13 .7 _ 17 .i IS 0 .097 3 . 314 L2 .9 :,a L 0 .0 78 0 . 314 12 .8 8 14 . 1 3 r 0 .040 0 . 314 12 .7 8 F: 0 .3i6 0 .314 14 .6 a - _ _i._ .__._.._.__ _.-. h , 4'/t. = 0 .55.? LOS = 0 INT RSL ION ' t:.�eiaY 14 .0 % sec/ve Supplemental Exhibit ITEM J 1N REFERENCE TO PUD PLAT NO'1E J . WEED CONTROL NELSON ENGINEERS 822 7TH STREET GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 (303) 356-6362 August 11, 1993 Mr. Norman Wells Soil Conversation Service 9595 Nelson Road, Box D Longmont, CO 80501 RE: Weed Control - Ft. Junction PUD, 1st Filing Dear Mr. Wells: A few days ago Art Uhrich of this office discussed with you weed control at the subject site during and after construction. In accordance with that conversation, I wish to inform you that it is the owners intent to follow the SCS guidelines as closely as possible both during and after construction. During development of the initial PUD plan, the owner plans to control weeds with chemicals and to mow regularly throughout the construction period. Every attempt will be made to prevent weeds from maturing to keep them from reseeding the area. Upon completion of construction all areas will be landscaped and seeded with grasses compatible with this location. Grass mixes will be submitted to the U.S. Soil Conservation Service in Longmont for review and approval. No changes within the PUD plan are anticipated outside of the 1st PUD plan application. We will appreciate receiving your concurrence wit alhh isM plan lanrfor weed control. If you have any questions, please or me. Respectfully, LaVern C. Nelson, P.E. LCN:pa 931249 EXHIBIT ITEM J UNITED STATE- Soil 9595 Nelson Road #D DEPARTMENT OF Conservation Longmont, CO. 80501 AGRICULTURE Service Phone: 776-4034 August 24 , 1993 RECEIVED AUG 2 5 1991 Nelson Engiineers 822 7th Street Greeley, Coloardo 80631 RE: Weed Control - Ft . Junction PUD I have received your letter of August 11 and I am in concurrence with your plan for weed control on the PUD plan. Mowing and/or chemicals applied during construction should be adequate to control weed growth. Seeding to an adapted grass after construction is completed should give long term weed control. If you desire a recommendation for the adapted species for seeding, please feel free to call . If you need further assistance, please not hesitate to call . Our office phone number is 776-4034 and our office hours are 7 : 30 to 5 : 00 , Monday through Friday. S ' cerely, kurnQ ,�� . No man J. 1Wells , Jr . District Conservationist 9::1.249 Exhibit Item K - Plat Notes roust MOUNTAIN VIEW FIRE PR, 1 ECTION DISTRICT Administrative Office: 700 Weaver Park Road • Longmont, CO 80501 8 (303) 772-0710 Metro (303) 666-4404 new August 9, 1993 Mr. Loren Bley Bley Associates 2020 Clubhouse Drive Greeley, CO 80634 RE: Del Camino Pre,Release Center - Utility Service Dear Mr. Bley: The proposed site for the facility is within the boundaries of the Mountain View Fire Protection District. Fire protection service to the facility will be provided by this Fire District. The utility plan, undated, which was sent to the Fire District has been reviewed for compliance with the adopted codes and standards of the District. Per our agreement on the telephone today, I have calculated the required fire flow as 1500 gallons per minute at 20 pounds per square inch for this facility using the following criteria: 1. The building will have a total floor area counting first and second floors„ and mezzanines of less than 128,700 square feet. 2. The building will be of Type I or Type II Fire Resistant Construction as defined by the Uniform Building Code. 3. The building will be sprinklered throughout by an automatic sprinkler system complying with the requirements of N.F.P.A. Standard 13, Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems. 4. The building will be detected throughout by a smoke detection system. The fire alarm system will be remoted to an approved monitoring point. Del Camino Pre-Release Facility-Utility Plan 1of2 Station 1 Station 2 Station 3 Station 4 Station 5 Station a Station 7 9119 Cnly Line Rd. 10971 WCR 13 P.O.Box 575 -P.O.Box 11 10911 Dobbin Run P.O.Box 666 P.O.Box 40 Longmont,CO Longrrant,CO 299 Palmer Ave. 6500 Niwot Road Lafayette.CO 600 Briggs 100 So.Forest SI. 80501 80504 Mead.CO 90542 Niwot,CO 80544 80026 Erie,CO 80516 Dacono,CO 90514 931.2. 49 If these criteria change then the required fire flow will need to be recalculated. If the water system as shown will provide the required fire flow, then the water system is approved. Documentation will be needed from the design engineers. Hydrant locations as shown will be approved. There is an area on the east wall within the fenced yard that is not reachable within 650 foot of a hydrant by line of travel. However, the standpipe system inside the building will be usable in lieu of installing an additional hydrant and associated mains around the east side of the building. The design of the access roads, as shown, meet the standards of the District, as long as the roads will support 60,000 pounds imposed load. Chief Ward, Chief of the District, would like to meet with the representatives of the owner to discuss other issues with them. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Charles m E. Boyes Fire Prevention Specialist CC: Jerry Ward, Chief of the District William N. Bailey, Deputy Chief, Support Services Mark A. Lawley, Assistant Chief, Fire Prevention Del Camino Pre-Release Facility-Utility Plan 2 of 2 9312'19 iplemental Exhibit ITEM M- IN I2)...ERENCE TO PUD PLAT NODE M. - Ruxa.l Ditch NELSON ENGINEERS 822 7TH STREET GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 (303) 356-6362 August 6 , 1993 Job 314 Rural Ditch Company Attn: Lee Gould , Jr. 12148 WCR #13 Longmont, CO 80504 RE: Fort Junction P.U.D. Dear Sir: A developer is in the process of purchasing the captioned parcel of land from the New Creation Ministries. At present, the purchaser is preparing the final plans for the first filing of the north 22 acres of Fort Junction P.U.D. He is required to notify ditch companies of any intentions and to demonstrate that the plans do not affect your ditch. The accompanying plan shows that the first filing is approximately 900 to 1 , 000 feet north of the Rural Ditch. Further, natural drainage is north and away from the ditch. No site runoff will be discharged into the ditch as a result of this development and there are no plans to grade the farmland between the ditch and the first filing of Fort Junction. If there are any questions , please contact our office. Very truly yours , 01-L -7-4LIL Arthur F. Uhrich AFU:pa Enclosure 9: 1:'49 PUD CHANGE OF ZONE FORT JUNCTION WELD COUNTY. COLORADO DECEMBER, 1988 Prepared by L Nelson Engineers Greeley, Colorado 890233 NELSON ENGINEERS GREELEY NATIONAL PLAZA 822 7TH STREET GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 (303)356-6362 December 16, 1988 Rod Allison, Current Planner Weld County Department of Planning Services 915 Tenth Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Re: Change of Zone, Fort Junction PUD Project No. 8016 Dear Rod: Enclosed is the Change of Zone application for the referenced site. Issues raised at the Sketch Plan review stage have been addressed in the Change of Zone application. We wish to proceed with the review of Change of Zone application by the Planning Commission at their January 17, 1989 meeting and the Board of County Commissioners in February, 1989. Please review the enclosed application material and contact me if you have any questions. Respectfully, NELSON ENGINEERS Arthur F. Uhrich Project Engineer AFU/gc Enclosures 890233 ?LD AWNED i'::IT DEVELOPMENT) REZONING APpLIC.,TIO:1 Case Dept. of Planning Services App. Ch'd By: Date Rec'd: 915 lOch Street App. Fee: Receipt Greeley, Colorado d0h31 Record. Fee:_ Receipt ". Phone: 356-4000. E:Ct. 4400 TO BE CO:IPLLTED BY APPLICANT. Please print or type, except for necessary signature. I (we), the undersigned. hereby request hearings before the Weld County Planning Commission and the Weld County Board of County Commissioners concerning the proposed rezoning of the following described unincorporated area of Weld County, Colorado: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See attached legal description (If additional space is required, attach an additional sheet) Property Address (if available): Northeast corner of I-25 and Weld County Road 24 PRESENT ZONE Agriculture PROPOSED ZONE POD * TOTA1. ACREAGE 54.6 OVERLAY ZONES * C-1 through C-4 plus I-1, and an oil and gas well site. SURFACE FEE (PROPERTY OWNERS) OF AREA PROPOSED FOR REZONING: Name: H. Raymond Jacques Home Telephone 761-8306 Address: 1840 West Union Avenue Bus. Telephone 761-7501 Englewood, Colorado 80110 Name: Nnw rrcnrinne Miniarry.o and wnrld neereach Home Telephone 0: Address: Center Church Bus. Telephone 0: 776-4225 737 Bross Longmont, Colorado 80501 Home Telephone 0 Name: Bus. Telephone U: Address: Applicant or Authorized Agent (if different than above): Home Telephone 0: Name: Bus. Telephone 0: Address: Owner(s) and/or lessees of mineral rights on or under the subject properties of record ; in the Weld County Assessor's Office: Name: Amoco Production Company Address: Heruriry I.ifr Building Denver, Colorado 80202 Name: Address: Name: Address: itieS f jury that l and/orb planso submittedawithnorr contained the lwithin o this rapplication lare t true s ands proposals correct co the best of my knowledge. • COUNTY OF WELD STATE OF COLORADO ) ,2 -Rat,_ Signature: or Authorized Agent 166 Subscribed and sworn to before me this ll day of • • SEAL fin(—� /�n uL(Q l��/// • l//4i/yR,ce s,4/ct� 'GARY PUBLIC 890233 My Cot csien eztires: �a pa • :VD ED DEVELOPMENT) REZONING APPLICATION Cese -. Dept. of Planning Services App. Ch'd By: Date Recd: 915 10th Street App. Fee: Receipt Greeley, Colorado 30631 Record. Fce:_ Receipt ". Phone: 356-4000, Exc. +400 TO BE COMPLETED by APPL:CAN'r. rieaeu print or type. except :or neces,:ary signature. . I (we), the undersigned. hereby request hearings before the Veld County Planning Commission and the Weld County Board of County Commissioners concerning the proposed rezoning of the following described unincorporated area of Weld County, Colorado: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See attached legal description. (If additional space is required, attach an additional sheet) Property Address (if available): NE corner of I-25 and WEld County Road 24 PRESENT ZONE Agriculture PROPOSED ZONE PUD * TOTAL ACREAGE 54.6 OVERLAY ZONES * C-1 through C-4 plus I-1, and an oil and gas well site. SURFACE FEE (PROPERTY OWNERS) OF AREA PROPOSED FOR REZONING: Name: H. Raymond Jacquez Home Telephone 0: 761-8306 Address: 1840 West Union Avenue Bus. Telephone 0: 761-2501 Englewood, Colorado 80110 Name: New Creations Ministries and World Outreach Home Telephone 0: Address: Center Church Bus. Telephone 0: 776-4225 737 Bross Longmont, Colorado 80501 Home Telephone U: Nate: Address: • Bus. Telephone 0: Applicant or Authorized Agent (if different than above): !! r Name: • Home Telephone 0: Address: _ Bus. Telephone 0: • Owner(s) and/or lessees of mineral rights on or under the subject properties of record in the Weld County Assessor's Office: • Name: Amoco Production Company Address: Serurity Life Building • Denver, Colorado 80202 Name: Address: Name: Address: I hereby depose and state under the penalities of perjury that all statements, proposals and/or plans submitted with or contained within this application are true and correct to • the best of my knowledge. COUNTY OF WELD STATE OF COLORADO ) ignacure: Owner o: Aucho zed Age t Subscribed and sworn to before me this JF/ day of A' //2i! G%- , SEAL l7l� 44 / � f/-7 , 7, 7 NOTA PUBLIC �My Ccfssiam er:lres: C/ [f / ,,Z- 89®233 LEGAL DESCRIPTION �. • A PART OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW 1/4) OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 2 . NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: • COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 2 AND,CONSIDER- ING THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW 1/4) TO BEAR SOUTH SOUTH 89°46'09` EAST, WITH ALL OTHER BEARINGS RELATIVE THERETO; THENCE- SOUTH X89°46'09" EAST; 564.90 FEET ALONG.T)iE..SOUTH. LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW 1/4) OF SECTION 2; THENCE NORTH 00°15'•52' EAST, 30.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF A'.•PARCEL OF.LAND DEEDED TO THE COLORADO-DEPARTMENT OFHIGH- WAYS IN BOOK 1500, PAGE 551 OF THE-WELD.COUNTY.RECORDS; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE THE FOLLOWING TWO COURSES: NORTH 52°5L'38' WES.Tri75.00 FEET; • - NORTB X13'40'-.3."WEST, 602.83 FEET TO-THE-POINT OF- BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE THE FOLLOWING ;THREE COURSES: - . . NORTH 13°48'38` WEST, 739.65 FEET; NORTH- 04°36'08":WEST, 867.31 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; ALONG A CURVE .TOTHE RIGHT WHOSE RADIUS IS 11,297.64 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE. OF AND AN. ARC LENGTH OF 427:23 FEET TO A POINT OF- THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST. QUARTER (SW 1/4)'DF SAIDSECTION. 2 AND THE END OF THE EASTLINE.OF THE' 'PARCEL•DESCRIBED. IN BOOK 1500„ PAGE 551; THENCE SOUTH'89°35'48” EAST, 1120.00 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF -THE SOUTHWEST•.{SW 1/4) OF-SAID SECTION 2; • °. . 1E. THENCE SOUTH 75°55'48' EAST, 132.00 FEET;• . '.S THENCE SOUTH O1°23'56" WEST, 2633.52 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 2t i THENCE NORTH 89°46'09" WEST, 174.38 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH/LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW 1/4) OF SECTION 2; . ;j THENCE -NORTH 01°23'56" EAST, 660.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°46'09' WEST, 753.08 FEET TO THE"POINT OP ••BEGINNING. SAID PARCEL. CONTAINS 54.625 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. - . 890233 SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS FORT JUNCTION NOVEMBER, 1988 1 . The PUD district application forms and application fee. The PUD District application forms and application fee of $600 are attached. 2. A statement describing the proposed PUD Concept, land-use(s ) , and architectural style of the PUD. The 55± acre PUD will integrate commercial, industrial and business park uses. The commercial and industrial uses will be located along the east portion of the site. An open space greenway is planned along the Rural Ditch. The use along that portion fronting Interstate 25 will be commercial and business park. Fort Junction PUD will be goverened by private covenants., which will address architectural and design features of the development. Items such as, building materials, landscape requirements, maintenance, fencing and signs will be addressed in the covenants to be developed at the final PUD stage. 3. A statement which demonstrates the proposed PUD rezoning is consistent with the policies of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. The proposed land uses are consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan designation. Uses allowed within the PUD are intended to fall within the following Weld County Zoning classifications: C-1 through C-4 and I-1. The general location of these uses is shown on the accompanying District Plat Map. The site is in the Mixed Use Development area designated as Del Camino in the adopted Weld County Comprehensive Plan. 4. A statement which demonstrates how the USES allowed by the pro- posed PUD rezoning will be compatible within the PUD district. In addition, a detailed description of how any conflicts be- tween land uses within the PUD district are being avoided or mitigated and can comply with Section 35.3 of the Weld County Zonning Ordinance. In order to insure compatibility of uses within the PUD, they are located adjacent to one another. Design standards will be established through architectural covenants and will speci- fically address the Performance Standards outlined in Section 35.3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. In addition, the uses allowed within the commercial/industrial portion of the 890233 PUD will be limited to the following Weld County Zoning Clas- sifications : C-1 through C-4 and I-1 as identified on the District Plat map. 5 . A statement which demonstrates how the USES allowed by the proposed PUD rezoning will be compatible with land uses surrounding the PUD district; in addition, a detailed des- cription of how any conflicts between land uses surrounding the PUD district are being avoided or mitigated. Surrounding land uses are C-3 zoning and agricultural, all campatible with the proposed zoning. Compatibility with surrounding land uses will be ensured by the following: a . The proposed uses are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designations . b. The industrial uses proposed will be limited to the I-1 zoning category, thus requiring any manufacturing to be contained within buildings . c. Architectural covenants will be established which provide for design standards and ensure a quality development. d. Perimeter landscaping will be required in conjunction with the development. 6. A description of each use within the PUD. A description of all building, structures , and open storage areas, including size, floor area, and height. A description of the type of residential units within the PUD, including total number of units for each type. The PUD plan application will include detailed information and covenants regulating building size, height, style, roof pitch, materials, color, signage, outdoor storage, and land- scaping. A preliminary estimate of the use percentage of total develop- ment and an estimate of building square footage is as follows: Percentage Square Footage Commercial 39 470,000 Industrial 18 215, 000 ! The proposed height limitations for structures is 50 feet. Open storage areas will be screened per the I-1 zoning regula- tions and as specified in the covenants. 7. A description of the size and type of any public and private open space and semi-public uses, including parks, recreation areas, school sites, fire and sheriff facilities, and similar uses. Open space will be provided along the Rural Ditch, which trans- verses the width of the PUD. In addition, large amounts of 890233 open space are naturally available in the R.V. camping area that will also contain a detention pond in the northeast corner of the PUD. No public or semi-public uses are anticipated . 8. A description of the water source and system and a statement from the representative of the provider of the water system which demonstrates that the water supply quality and quantity is sufficient to meet the requirements of the uses within the PUD district. A PUD district with residential USES shall be . served by a PUBLIC WATER system. Water service for the PUD will be provided by the Central Weld County Water District. There is an existing 12" line along the southern boundary of the site. The internal water system will be developed consistent with the Fire Protection District Regulations and approved by the Central weld County Water District. A letter from Mr. John Zadell indicating the District' s ability to serve the area is attached as Exhibit A. 9. A description of the sewage disposal facility. If the faci- lity is a sewer system, a statement from the representative of the provider of the sewer system utility which demonstrates that the sewer system will adequately serve the uses within r the PUD district. rovided by the Sanitary sewer service for the PUD wil an 18 inch and 1 Saint Vrain Sanitation District. At present an 8 inch sewer line lie within the subject site. The on- site system will be designed consistent with the District' s I standards. A letter from Mr. Lee Lawson outlining the con- t ditions for service is attached as Exhibit B. 10. A description of the functional classification,width, and th,and structural capacity of the STREET and highway which provide access to the PUD district. If the street or highway facilities providing access to the PUD rdio district . not adequate to meet the lrequirements nformation which demonstrates the the il applicant a shall ncia y the STREET or willingness and financial capability to upgrade highway facilies in conformance with the Transporation Section of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. This shall be shown by iai , sweph the arate off-sitened nit evelopment strict application, a proposed describing the p road improvements and method of guaranteeing installation of said improvements in conformance with the Weld County Policy on Collateral for Imp evs. alua- tion,agreement shall be used for the purposes of review,sh evalua and compliance with this section. No rezoning finally approved by the Board of County Commissioners until the applicant has submitted an improvements agreement or con- _ tract which sets forth the form of improvements and guanantees and is approved by the Board of County Commissioners. A traffic impact analysis of the Fort Junction PUD has been prepared by Matthew J. Delich, P.E. , and is attached as 890233 Exhibit C. Recommendations for off site improvements are outlined in the report. Based on their recommendations , a site specific traffic analysis will be performed as an adden- dum to his report in conjunction with each Final PUD Plan. This addendum will contain recommendations for phasing of off- site improvements based upon the traffic impact of each use within the Final PUD phase. It is contemplated that financing of off-site road improvements will be accomplished as follows: A group of landowners within the Del Camino area are currently pursuing formation of a Special Improvement Distrit for trans- portation improvements . Once in place this will act as the funding mechanism for off site improvements . 11. A soil survey and study of the site proposed for the change of zone with a statement regarding suitability of soils to support all USES allowed in the proposed zone. If the soils survey and study indicate soils which present moderate or severe limitations to the construction of STRUCTURES or faci- lities on the site, the applicant shall submit information which demonstrates that the limitations can be overcome. This information will be forwarded to the Colorado Geological Survey for evaluation. The soils within the PUD are made up of three general types as defined by the Soil Conservation Service soil survey of Weld County southern part. Aquolls-Aquents, Gravelly Substratum: deep, nearly level in bottom lands and flood plains of major streams Poorly drained soils that formed in recent alluvium. Aquolls-Aquepts, Flooded: deep, level, poorly drained that formed in recent alluvium. Vona, Sandy Loam: deep, somewhat level, well drained, on higher terraces, and formed by eolian and alluvial deposits. This application is being accompanied by Exhibit D, guide- ' line excerpts from the published "Soils Survey of Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part" , developed by the United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Services (SCS) . Their report reveals that the portion north of the Rural Ditch has some limitations to construction due to localized flooding from row crop irrigation. This area re- mains relatively wet during the summer months due to poor drainage and a high water table. The area south of the Rural Ditch displays better drainage and a thicker overburden of soils more impermeable to surface water. Therefore, the con- struction limitations to the southern portions are in the moderate category. 890233 The soils show some restrictions that will have to be addres- sed by site specific soil testing prior to development of each area of the PUD. These restrictions can be overcome by detailed subsurface soils investigations, application of appropriate drainage facilities , and strict adherence to the recommendations of the report. 12. If, according to maps and other information available to Weld County, the Department of Planning Services determines that there appears to be a sand, gravel, or other mineral resources on or under the subject property, the applicant shall provide a mineral resource statement prepared by a certified geologist or other qualified expert. The statement shall indicate the estimated quality of resources and indicate the economic feasi- bility of recovery, now and in the future, of the resources so that the Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners can determine whether a COMMERCIAL MINERAL DEPOSIT, as defined in Colorado Revised Statutes is contained on or under the sub- ject properties. This information will be forwarded to the Colorado Geological Survey for evaluation. Although the property is approximately 1, 000 feet wide and 2,600 feet long, it is transversed by the Rural Ditch through its width. The Wyco Gas Company has a 50 foot wide easement in the north-south direction, approximately 150 feet west of the east boundary. In addition to the described easements , the Colorado State Highway Department has preliminary plans for frontage road realignment which would cross midway the Rural• easement and the corner tract excluded between from this parcel and titled Kahn Subdivision. The setback requirements for roads, easements, slopes of excavation, and adjacent properties would render all but 20 acres restrictive to open pit mining. It is our opinion that 20 acres is not economically feasible to operate an open pit mine. Further, the geotechnical report provided for Rocky Mountain Consultants , Inc. , and the New Creation Ministeries by Empire Laboratories, Inc. , Exhibit E, revealed that the gravel to 9thick- ict ness ranges from 12 to 15 feet in thickness with up of overburden. Conversely, lands to the north and east, which have been approved for open pit mining, reveal overburdens of only 6 feet and mineable gravel thicknesses of 18.5 feet. The remaining 20 acres which is mineable has a ratio of over burden to mineable gravel of 1.7 to 1. In order for gravel to be of economic value, a ratio of 3 to 1 is necessary. Therefore, mining for gravel is not economically feasible at this site. 990233 Oil and gas mineral rights are leased. It is the intent of the applicant to obtain an agreement with the lessees for an agreeable drill site that will be allocated on the final PUD plat. 13 . If the proposed change of zone is located within a FLOOD HAZARD AREA, identified by maps officially adopted by County, the applicant shall submit information which either documents how the Weld County supplementary regulations con- cerning flood plains have been satisfied or document how the applicant intends to meet the concerning flood plains. The site is situated at least 500 feet south of the Saint Vrain Creek flood plain hazard area. 14. If the proposed change of zone is located within a GEOLOGIC HAZARD AREA identified by maps officially adopted by Weld County, the applicant shall submit information which either documents how the Weld County supplementary regulations con- cerning geologic hazards have been satisfied, or documents how the applicant intends to meet the requirements of the Weld County supplementary regulations concerning geologic hazards. The PUD is not located within any geologic hazard areas as defined by the Geologic Hazard Map adopted by Weld County on April 19 , 1978 . 15. A sign shall be posted on the property under consideration for PUD rezoning. The sign shall be posted by the applicant, who shall certify that the sign has been posted for at least ten (10) days preceding the hearing date. The sign shall be provided by the Department of Planning Services. The required sign will be posted by the applicant and the affidavit will be forwarded to the County at that time. 16. A certified list of the names, addresses and the corresponding parcel identification number assigned by the Weld County Assessor of the owners of property (the surface estate) within five hundred (500) feet of the property subject to the appli- cation. The source of such list shall be the records of the Weld County Assessor, or an ownership update from a title or abstract company or attorney, drived from such records, or from the records of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. If the list was assembled from the records of the Weld County Assessor, the applicant shall certify that such assembled within thirty (30) days of the application submis- sion date. A certified list of property owners within 500 feet of the property was prepared by Nelson Engineers and is attached as Exhibit F. 890233 17. A certified list of the names and addresses of mineral owners and lessees of mineral owners on or under the parcel of land being considered. The source of such list shall be assembled from the records of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder, or from an ownership update derived from such records of a title or abstract company or prepared by an attorney derived from such records. A certified list of the names and addresses of mineral owners and leases of mineral owners on or under the parcel was pre- pared by Nelson Engineers and is attached as Exhibit G. 18 . Such additional information as may be required by the Depart- ment of Planning Services, the Planning Commissioner, or the Board of County Commissioners in order to determine that the application meets the goals , policies, and standards set forth in the Weld County Zoning Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan. • 890233 EXHIBIT A 890233 RECEIVED n^ 1.u v `2 5 (.:38..�: CENTRAL WELD COUNTY WATER DISTRICT November 22, 1988 Mr. Arthur F. Uhrich Nelson Engineers Greeley National Plaza 822 7th Street Greeley, CO 80631 RE : Water Service - Project 8016 Dear Mr. Uhrich: This letter is in response to your request for water service to serve the following described property : See Attached Legal Description Water service can be made available to the above described property provided all requirements of the District are satisfied , including easements where required for District facilities . Central Weld County Water District requires that contracts be consumated within one ( 1 ) year from the date of this letter , or this letter shall become null and void unless extended in writing by the District . Very truly yours . CENTRAL WELD COUNTY WATER DISTRICT er t n W . Zadel /vim eneral Manager JWZ/ca 830233 2235 2nd Avenue • Greeley. Colorado 80631 • (303) 352.1284 • John W. Zadel, General Manager EXHIBIT B 890233 RECEIVED cSt. Vzauz cSanLtatLOn "C LtLct taint can) Ooo A/L.4,n'; .a-Si-.:a �cicplonc • Suidc 13031 776-0570 November 22, 1988 !'uny^-ont. CO Soso, • Nelson Engineers Greeley National Plaza 822 Seventh Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 ATTN: Mr. Arthur F. Uhrich Re: Saint Vrain Sanitation District - Commitment to Serve Dear Art: This letter is in reference to the following-described real property: Fort Junction - A part of the Southwest Quarter, Section 2, Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, Weld County, Colorado. The waste water disposal system of this District is adequate to serve the proposed uses within the referenced PUD development. District lines are in place to accept this load. • Saint Vrain Sanitation District has 1852 SFE (single family equivalent) taps, of which 113.4 have been purchased, resulting in 1738.6 available for purchase. These taps are available to you and other eligible landowners on a first-come, first-served basis, with a single exception. Prior to the adoption of its present policy, the District committed itself to reserve 163 SFE taps for a period of time. This commitment expires December 31, 1988; they will then be converted to this same first-come, first-served basis. This results in 1575.6 SFE taps presently available. As the present supply of taps is consumed, the District plans to increase the size of its treatment plant to serve 5,555 SFE taps. These additional taps will also be made available on a first-come, first-served basis. The above-referenced property is eligible to utilize the available supply of • taps on a first-come, first-served basis, subject to the following: a. installation of on-site collection system and connection to the District's system by the applicant; b. execution of a Service Agreement; c. purchase and payment of the required number of taps; and d. compliance with the District' s Rules and Regulations. 890233 Mr. Arthur F. Uhrich Nelson Engineers November 22, 1988 Page 2 • Should you wish to obtain an absolute commitment to serve, taps may be pre- purchased and held until needed. Monthly service charges will be assessed upon completion of construction or twelve months, whichever comes first. Should you have any questions concerning this matter, do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly urs, D. Lawson, P.E. Manager LDL:js SAINT • 890233 EXHIBIT C I I_ 890233 m C, N C 0 0 0 November 15 _ 17='3 O -3 u M • m a z Mr . Art Uhrich WNelson Enoineers 322 7th Street O Dear Art : Attached are the 10 copies of the Fort Junction Traffic= Impact Stud.: . • z I was in error when I told you the xxxix :x meant AM/PM traffic . It really siQrlifie_. Phase 1/Phase 2 as indicated at the top of the various figures in the report . The traffic indicated is for afternoon peak hour traffic in Phase 1 and Phase 2, respectively . The morning peak hour is riot the critical time period and I deemed it not nerecc-a.ry to analyze . I noticed in the December 16 , 1933 , Rocky Mountain Mews that the Colorado Jocky Club is less of a given . This will greatly affect the background traffic assumed in this. study . At an appropriate time in the future , this traffic study should be updated to reflect this . Sincerely ,n a -,' - Matthew J . Delich , P .E. CD Liu w • J_Cm U • = z • V CI W 2 O d N • Q '7 G • W u _ N � Q 890233 • • SEE REPORT ENTITLED TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY WELD COUNTY, COLORADO • • t • 690233 EXHIBIT D i I 890233 SOIL SURVEY WELD COUNTY, COLORADO i United State Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service • In Cooperatrion With Colorado Agricultural Experiment Station 890233 1 t y y .fir -14 tr wi'-� �'� NY1.� -'.7:-�a.aGY�,: s"k.LRL _ Rn' fiS 5EF _____...\H-.5.-.;ragarI 44 62 7a l •- +F:1 61 ; . 6 t. ti �� jj Ils: -' 34 ? t e 35 �y r ' %� ` r.O.1.9: ,i. I .•„`•t, .tr41/41,054 tom{,"{-.v r Yl r : :+Y 16 Prd71 ; 6,. 4''L+M114 ry 34_ .' , ,{�C: ‘Ii • 61 15 .fJ�% .i•'.4,TS •� • y!MN. lK t Y ya.'S .... 65 65 ! - ,�S .'.fi;oh. - R.�iY 't > . we .�.•r�a ette vs-7.4.-116 z I. t17 _ 3 :1;...!••.:11.1-el‘?-•'—.•‘1,1?-%. .i,,�•;yh/ j 7 1 . ;i y,�<Fa j7.c++5cy4.'k '>. ;� t : .:_Y IF- f' Tt 27;Vt5 +C .- 7 i ,--- r. . •FI J� .r ' R 3 }}t i,yIN: • Y Y iT �t,-.' . �/ L ;$4....1.'-',4i. 7 �d"i t"rr b. - fS: n• * •� , a..� t'•1,` ?}-• r�� •') a'sYy �7t Vytr]a• r 5r r' .. �'✓ .7r. ,,r 3F ' ` ts llii 1 \ r 3 � fat rs d WCR'24 / � . N ,j_ < �'I 1 �FEZ � .a. j k�. �r'y ti tt r, S s•s Yt- _. 1 I ' ' _.i I. .� .Hi Y • 7+ir r F' 441 FORT U r ' Mta _r • ' .r 7�,I t4 Ii -:-r �6r� 4J. fCT�0 ,q ._t } , �Qa .s. 0 ,5,7141 % // i yy e 7 eitilf� 1 .1 1 , n• Ir 4 R .. , .a%r • yam, w .,fir iR `T{�, t t 1 • 10 � '` q 1 r 1� <6 'a �j. 7 ..� 4 rs • r _'76 ,I II ,• .r ". p 1' N � 1; 5 f :41.4 52 r10 .i'd''a 48 ',1_, F I.. ... _ L( l 763 1. < +d7 47 •.•27 R '1, tey u 1r (j,i��a I , • 13 j�5"CALE — � Q j 0 ,1:,.. ✓ �Ar 3TiI1a 77 ., j` 7,7„.. L.. • , _ •'. 48 q] t t :: S ` 4r . .)ax 1 ;77. 741 A►'•, �rd ``•J • • r" t•tisi dttl ) • '` .. )�a 77 38 •. . -�i` z t w. js 'k.77 OW .� t�'� 1 _ .r. Ic 't ' Y r7 H• '—r r, t it ,r r•�v ., 7 •S a r ; �r i t'• y :r • - �. t ite�''r t :i f �� r W Is `.• .'Yti. _Q{' �` d, 1/ `:,{�`�+J �/, '13 >a.7 r Cobt` lv 38 177 76f 1 :.+ ' 1,r ' ( E�r.r•.M1 ' ,r+ ay ] '`. fqt r 4 1? t f "'r+ +•f q�d tl 2fi ' �Iri a h ^1� t .•t �'1 . 44 ''..I 8 SOIL SURVEY filter the leachate. Sewage lagoons require sealing. GO percent of the unit. Aquents, which have a lighte Lawns, shrubs, and trees grow well. Capability subclass colored surface layer, make up about 35 percent. About Its irrigated. percent is Aquepts and Bankard sandy loam. 2—Altvan loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes. This is a deep, These are deep, poorly drained soils that formed i- well drained soil on terraces at elevations of 4,500 to 4,900 recent alluvium. No one pedon is typical. Commonly tl; feet. It formed in old alluvium deposited by the major soils have a mottled, mildly alkaline to moderately a,- rivers. Included in mapping are small areas of soils that kaline loamy or clayey surface layer and underlying show evidence of poor drainage. Also included are small, material and are underlain by sand or sand and gray long and narrow areas of sand and gravel deposits. within 48 inches. In places they have a gleyed layer in tl Typically the surface layer of this Altvan soil is grayish underlying material. brown loam about 10 inches thick. The subsoil is brown Most of the acreage is subject to flooding. The water and light yellowish brown clay loam and sandy clay loam table is at or near the surface early in spring and reced. about 14 inches thick.The substratum is calcareous loamy to as deep as 48 inches late in fall in some years. sand about 5 inches thick over gravelly sand. These soils are used for rangeland and wildlife habitat. Permeability and available water capacity are Some small areas have been reclaimed by major drainar moderate. The effective rooting depth is 20 to 40 inches. and leveling and are used for irrigated crops. Surface runoff is medium, and the erosion hazard is low. The potential native vegetation is dominated by alka,. This soil is used almost entirely for irrigated crops. It sacaton, switchgrass, and western wheatgrass. Saltgrass, is suited to all crops commonly grown in the area, includ- sedge, rush, and alkali bluegrass are also prominel ing corn, sugar beets, beans, alfalfa, small grain, potatoes, Potential production ranges from 3,000 pounds per acre and onions. An example of a suitable cropping system is 3 favorable years to 2,000 pounds in unfavorable years. As to 4 years of alfalfa followed by corn, corn for silage, range condition deteriorates, the switchgrass, alkali sugar beets, small grain, or beans. Land leveling, ditch sacaton, and western wheatgrass decrease and saltgra , lining, and installing pipelines may be needed for proper sedge, and rush increase. water application. Management of vegetation should be based on taking All methods of irrigation are suitable, but furrow ir- half and leaving half of the total annual production. Se( '- rigation is the most common. Barnyard manure and com- ing is difficult and costly because numerous tillage pr. mercial fertilizer are needed for top yields. tices are required to eliminate the saltgrass soa. Windbreaks and environmental ea arcs of trees and Svritrhgrass, western wheatgrass, alkali sacaton, tall �I shrubs commonly grown in the area are generally well wheatgrass, and tall fescue are suitable for seeding. Tt suited to this soil. Cultivation to control competing can be seeded into a clean, firm seedbed. Seedt t vegetation should be continued for as many years as preparation usually requires more than 1 year to possible following planting.Trees that are best suited and eliminate the saltgrass sod. A grass drill should be us--i. have good survival are Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern Seeding early in spring has proven most successful. redcedar, ponderosa pine, Siberian elm, Russian-olive, and Wetland wildlife, especially waterfowl, utilize this Ilium:. hackbeackberry. The shrubs best suited are skunkbush sumac, The wetland plants provide nesting and protective cover, lilac, Siberian peashrub, and American plum. as well as some food. The nearby irrigated cropla I, This soil can n produce e habitat elements that are highly where wildlife obtain much of their food and find prot suitable, nfor rang dove.wildlife including cops pheasant,et, cotton- tive cover, makes this unit valuable to both wetland and tail, and mourning Such crops as wheat, corn, and openland wildlife. alfalfa provide suitable habitat for openland wildlife, especially pheasant. Tree and shrub plantings Openland wildlife, especially pheasant, use this unit pr and pee y cover and nesting. Deer find excellent cover in sc-..e undisturbed nesting cover would enhance openland wil- areas. dlife populations. These valuable wildlife areas should be protected fr n This Altvan soil has fair to good potential for urban and recreational development. The chief limiting soil fea- fire and fenced to prevent encroachment and overuse y tures for urban development are the shrink-swell poten- livestock.They should not be drained. tial of the subsoil as it wets and dries and the rapid These soils have good potential as a source of sand and permeability of the sand and gravel substratum. Septic gravel. Capability subclass VIw; Salt Meadow range si - tank absorption fields function properly, but in places the 4 Aquolls and Aguepts, flooded. This nearly k el substratum does not contain enough fines to properly map unit is in depressions in smooth plains and along the filter the leachate. Sewage lagoons require sealing. bottoms of natural drainageways throughout the sure)/ Lawns, shrubs, and trees grow well. Capability subclass area. Aquolls, which have a dark colored surface la !r, make up about 55 percent of the unit. Aquepts, w....:11IIe irrigated. 3—Aquolls and Aquents, gravelly substratum. This have a lighter colored surface layer, make up about 25 nearly level map unit is on bottom lands and flood plains percent. About 20 percent is soils that are well dra' .d L. of all the major streams in the survey make up about the surface. oils that have sandstone or shale within 48 inche of which have a dark colored surfacel 890233 WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, SOUTHF.ItN PART this soil is well in If summer [allowed in alternate yea sorghum. Winter poorly drained soils that rofoomed the suited to winter wheat, barley, andThese are- deep, typical. Commonly The average yield is recent alluvium.mottled,one pedon is wheat is the principal crop. is predicted avkilled, spring soils have a ea mildly to moderately materialalkalinte loamy 3ih bushels be seeded.If the heraro precipitation ai too long or tends clayey depth te layer inches and underlying mo In lathat ex- watcan per acre. if crop for beneficial use of fertilizer. in and minimum til- water aglee layer of 60 or more. places they have aStubble mulch farming, striperopp g. a gleyed in the underlying material. and water erosion. and during lage are needed to control soil blowing Most of the acreage is subject to excessive runoff. The Terracing also may be needed to control water erosion. tableof is h i orri o the surface in spring on s si blue the peak of the irrigation season. The potential native vegetationsand re this srasnge site is dominated by sand bluestem, a sideoats grams These soils are used for rangeland and wildlife habitat. grams. Needleandthread, switchgras . Some small areas are a irrigated ve pasture.to by and western wheatgra d are also prominent Potential The pr native vegetation is alkali dominated anprd tion ranges from 2,200 pounds per acre in Potential big bluestem, prairie cordgrass, saltgrahess, s slender western wheatgras , ble years to 1,800 pounds in unfavorable years. As rang big bluestem, ge, andass, sand reed range in the swampy a, sedge, and rush. ed with i and ab rangeh grow condition deteriorates, the sand bluestem, sand eedr ed, and switchgrass decrease and blue gra er invade in the spots associated these range sites. favorable Poto production 3,000 ranges from in,000 unfavorable v per acre in and sand sage increase. Annual weeds and grass years to ter. pounds years. As the site as range condition becomes poorer. ed range condition deteriorates, the tall and ss. sedge, rush Management of vegetation should be b eed- n taking decrease, p sin poor condition. Sand roduction drops, and saltgre g half and leaving half of the total old b production. ation in adjacent areas has ing is desirable if the range switchgrass, condition. grams, increase.The farming and ono bluestem, sand reedgras and crested wheat- increased the amount of salts on much of the acreage. blue grams, pubescent wheatgrass. selected should Management of vegetation on this soil should be based grass are suitable for seeding. The grass on taking half and leaving half of the total annual,peodernrequirements of livestock. It can be tion. Switchgrass, big bluestem, indiangras . meet the seasonal req hum stubble, or it can be ubescent wheatgrass, intermediate wheat- seeded into a clean, firm Sorg scan in grass, tall P and tall fescue are suitable for drilled into a firm prepared seedbed. Seeding seeds tall a s, _ spring has proven most successful enerall� plants selected should met the seasonal plantings are g seeding. The seeding, Windbreaks and environmental p rinscia hazard l requirements repire d seedbed livestock.needed.d. For successfulasdrill should be sea suited to this soil. Soil blowing, the principal prepared is proven most successful. Til- establishing trees and shrubs, can be controlled by nPull ii only in the tree row and by leaving Seeding early in spring has proven tiegeing Supplemental irrigatio. loge is needed to l eliminate the undesirable1 utilize thisnunit. vegetation in between the o ws• dyPle and during do Wetland d plant especially may be needed at the time of planting land, surviv The wetland oets proviTh nesting and protective cover ondero= irrigated crop periods.Trees that are best ited easterna edcedar, P whereas well as some eobtain food. Thenearby are Rocky pine, Siberian elm, ks an sumac, lilac,and S. en wildlife obtain much of their food and find protec- Mountain juniper,are five cover, makes this unit valuable to both wetland and shrubs best suited openland bei wildlife. especially pheasant, use this unit for an peashrub. slant secondary use of this soil. T Openland nd wildlife, PQneck areaser. and nesting. Deer find excellent asshould cover in protected cropland areas provide favorable habitat for ring-neck c frogs. These valuable wildlife areas should be P dove. Many nongame spa areas for nesting and esc: from fire and fenced T to prevent encroachment and pheasant and mourning nesting covers ess overuse s by livestock. They should not eba owdra range an. Caps be cover.att For pheasants, hew establishing undisturbed tial and should be included in plans for habitat devel � bility subclass VIw•, Aquolls in Salt Meadow site, For p the pronghorn pyue As in Wet sandy dydow range sit•percent slopes. This is ment. Rangeland attwidede, for developing the pronghorn water 5—Ascalondrained loam,ilon1 plt 3 in and sestet in facilities, managing livestock grazing,i a deep, well soil uplands at elevations of 4,600 to opt, or growth • to 5,200 feet. It formed in alluvium. Included in mapping where needed• Ascalon soil are in major gr are small areas of rock f layer yeop• of the yellowish urbanized centers. The shrink-swell potentialsoil fee Typically the surface is brown sandy loam about Few areas of this brown inches sandy thick The subsoils 15 5le and soil as it in the s o and clay loam inches nct inches al s The sub- that must be considered is pl most limiting IIIe 1tes and roads. Capability subclass stratum to a depth of 60 is calcareous fine sandy strutting site. loam. n_ Plain n ng e. 3 to 5 slopes- Ti Permeabilityeffective is i moderate.in depth ptais inches cr saorcm is. Sandy Plains range uplands at percent slopes. of high. The effective rooting is 60 or more. a deep, well drained soil on Surface runoff is slow, and the erosion hazard is low. 890233 48 SOIL. SURVEY are Management a of nd leaving half of the total annual produc- suited Windbreaks this soil. Soil r blowing, tthenprincipal hazard generally ti takingis in poor by cul- an. Seeding is desirable if the range, switch grass,condition. sideoats tivatiiishing ng only t in the s n and shrubs,ow and by leaving a strip of ra bluestem,gr sand reedgrass, vegetation between the rows. Supplemental irrigation grams, blue reams, pubescent suitable for seeding. and grass selected crected may be necessary at the time of planting and during the s wheatgrass meet ee are sons requirements The It should the seasonal of livestock. It can dry periods. Trees that are best suited and have good be seeded into a clean, firm sorghum stubble, or it can be survival are Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern redcedar, drilled into a firm prepared seedbed. Seeding early in Ponderosa pine, Siberian elm, Russian-Olive, and hackber- ry.The shrubs best suited are skunkbush sumac, lilac, and spring has bras and environmental nst successful. Siberian peashrub- use of this soil- Wid to this liandand w are fairly'well Wildlife is an important secondary Ring-necked pheasant, mourning dove, and many non- and suited to this soil Blowing sand and low available water establishing areas for capacity h are the principal hazards in establishingTee d trees game species can be attracted by nesting and escape cover. For pheasants, undisturbed shrubs. This soil is so loose that trees should be nesting cover is essential and should be in plans planted between in furrows plem and vegetation tion be eneeded hoal in included o of intensive la to the rows.Supplemental that tat re besion may be.dehave for habitat development, especially to insure survival Trees that are best suited and have agriculture juniper, eastern This cul soil has good potential for urban and recreations good survival are Rocky Mountain w well. The redcedar, ponderosa pine, and Siberian elm. The shrubs development Lawns, shrubs, and trees grow best suited are skunkbush sumac, lilac, and Siberian only limiting feature is the rapid permeability in the sub- which causes a hazard of ground water con peashrub. stratum Wildlife is an important secondary use of this soil. Ran- lamination from sewage lagoons. Capability subclass II geland wildlife, for example, the pronghorn antelope, can irrigated. 76—Vona sandy loam. 1 to 3 percent slopes. This is a m attracted by developing livestock watering facilities, so on p and high terraces a managing livestock grazing,and reseeding where needed. cep we rain eolian an This soil has good potential for urban and recreational elevati ons of 4,600 to 5,200 feet It fo are rmed in leveled development Once established, the lawns, shrubs, and alluvial deposits. Included in mapping trees grow well. The primary limiting soil feature is the areas. Also included are small areas of soils that have a rapid permeability in the substratum, which causes aloamy substratum and areas of sonsthat are non car hazard of ground water contamination from sewage ous to a depth of 60 inches. - lagoons. In places recreational development is limited by Typically the surface layer of this Vona soil is grayish the susceptibility to soil blowing. Capability subclass VIe brown sandy loam about to inches thick. The subsoil - irrigated.VIe nonirrigated;Sandy Plains range site. brown foie sandy loam about 18 inches thick. The su 75—Vona sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes.This is a stratum to a depth of 60 inches is sandy ddy Awloam. ailable water deep, well drained soil on high terraces at elevations of permeability is moderately 4,650 to 4,950 feet. It formed in alluvial deposits. Included capacity is moderate. The effective rooting depth is in mapping are some leveled areas and small areas of inches or more. Surface runoff is slow, and the erosi soils that have a loamy substratum. hazard is low. Typically the surface layer of this Vona soil is grayish In irrigated areas this soil is suited to all crops co"•- brown sandy loam about 10 inches thick. The subsoil is monly grown in the area, including onions. An example e , brown fine sandy loam about 20 inches thick. The sub- beans, alfalfa,'small grain,is 3 to 4 years of alfalfa fol- suitable cropping systemsugar beets,small - st perm a a ty s of o inches is sandy loam. towed by corn, corn for silage, capacity a is m is moderately iveid. p waterand installing pipelii s is moderate. The effective rooting depth is 60 beans. Land leveling, ditch lining. Inches or more. Surface runoff is slow, and the erosion are needed for proper water applications. All methods of irrigation are suitable, but furrow ir- This is soil isirrigated crops. It rigation is the most common. Barnyard manure and a 1- is used r s commonly entirely for gayields. . is suited to all crops grown in the area, includ- mercial fertilizer are needed for top tings are generally ing corn, sugar beets, beans, alfalfa (fig. 7), small grain, Windbreaks and environmental e e a y example of a suitable cropping suited to thisresoil. aSoil sblblowing, t e controlledprincipal hazard in potatoes,is and onions. An alfalfa contr a styiE of system, 3 sugar 4 years of small followed beans.corn,corn dly establishing d by eavig irrigation p rge, le beets, smog tlyaie. rr somThe rapidly vegetation vating only between the rows.nSupplemental g peAll methods leof substratum slightly restricts etasome crops.u v at the time of planting and during 'ry irrigation are suitable, but furrow ir- may be necessary sun 'al All nis m common. r irrigation manage- periods.Trees that are best suited and have good al me ti is is the most yardmanure Prone pine, Siberian elm, Russian-olive, and hackberry• The incur is essential. Barnyaields.anure and commercial fertil- are Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern redcedar, ponderosa izer are needed for top y 690733 49 WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, SOUTHERN PART shrubs best suited are skunkbush sumac, lilac, and Siberi- and switchgrass decrease and blue grama, sand dropseed, and sand sage increase. Annual weeds and grasses invade an peashrub. Wildlife is an important secondary use of this soil. The the site as range condition becomes poorer. cropland areas provide favorable pheasant and mourning dove. Many anongame bitat for spec es can on staking half tand leaving half of the total annual produ of vegetation on this soil should be c- be undisturbed nesting cover is essen- Sand bluestem, sand reedgriss, switchgrass, sideoats be attracted by establishing areas for nesting and escape tion. Seeding is desirable if range is in poor condition. cover. For pheasants, blue gram; pubescent wheatgrass, and crested tial e and should be included in plans for habitat develop- grams are suitable for seeding. The grass selected men t, lly in areas m of intensive prog agpronghorn antelop. Range- suldwheatgrass land wildlife, for example, the pronghorn antelope, can be should meet the seasonal requirements of live or stock.can It can attracted by developing livestock watering facilities, be seeded into a clean, firm rghum stubble,or it early be managing livestock grazing, and reseeding where needed. drilled into a firm prepared This soil has good potential for urban and recreational spring has proven most successful are the principal hazard only limiting feature is the rapid permeability development. Lawns, shrubs, and trees grow well The Windbreaks and environmental plantings generally in the sub- suited to this soil. Soil blowing, in stratum, which causes a hazard of ground water con- establishing trees and shrubs, can be controlled by cul- tamination from sewage lagoons. Capability subclass fie tivating only vegetation in the tree row e the rows. d y Supplementalirrigation sipof irrigated; We nonirrigated; Sandy Plains range site. and durng dry 77—Vona sandy loam.3 to,5 percent slopes.This is a may be needed at the time of planting survival deep weu arautea'soU tin plains at elevations of 4,600 to periods.Trees that are best e� and have edgood sa 5,200 feet It formed in eolian deposits. Included in are Rocky Mountain juniper, mapping are small areas of soils that have a loamy'sub- pine, Siberian elm, Russian-olive, and hackberry. The stratum and areas of soils that are noncalcareous to a shrubs u best suited are skunkbush sumac, lilac and Siberi- depth of 60 inches. an Wildlife is an important secondary use of this soil The eashrub. Typically• na the surface mblayer of this hicks soil iss i cropland areas provide favorable habitat for ring-necked brown sandy loam about 8 inches thick. The subsoil is and mourning species can brown to sandy t loam about i15s inches thick. The sub- be attrpheasaacted by establishing areas for nesting and escape stratum a is of o inches is sandy loam undisturbed nesting cover is Permeability is moderately rapid. Available water cover. For pheasants, in plans for essen- capacity is moderate. The effective rooting depth is 60 tial and should be includ areas ed intensive agriculture.rhabitat develop- inches Rang - or more.Surface runoff is medium,and the erosion ment, eswildlife, � for example, the pronghorn antelope, can be corn- attracted by developing livestock watering facilities, hazard is low.. ` and reseeding where needed. in irrigated areas this e soil is sPerennial to the alfalfa or managing livestock grazing,money ws in crops area.be grasses potential for urban and r recreational close grown tour ditches hoh and grown at least 50percent d of Telo has ashrubs, and trees grow elL The the time. Contour corrugations can be used in development Lawns, permeability in the irrigating close grown crops and pasture. Furrows, con- only limiting feature is the rapid sub- tour furrows,and cross slope furrows are suitable for row stratum, which causes a hazard of ground water con- hi crops Sprinkler irrigation is also desirable. Keeping til- tamination from sewage lagoons. Capability subclass IIIe t loge to a minimum and utilizing crop residue help to con- irrigated,VIe nonirrigated; Sandy Plains range site. trot erosion. maintaining fertility is important. Crops 78—Weld loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes. This is a deep, well drained soil on smooth plains at elevations of 4,850 to respond In to ticda areas of this phosphorus and w feet It formed in eolian deposits. Included in tt In nonirrigated, adore . soil is suited t is n planted to mappingr wheat, are small areas of soils that have a subsoil of winter and sorghum. Most of the iel planted loam. Also included are some leveled winter wheat The predicted average yield is 28 bushels loam and light clay per acre. The soil is summer (allowed in alternate years areas.Typically the surface layer of this soil is to allow moisture accumulation. Generally precipitation is A P loam about l0 inches thick.The subsoil Weldis brown soil is brown hle too low to make rmi , st iperol use og, anrtimini clay loam and light clay loam. es Mulch co tool soil bl o i ng. and ater erasmum tillage are brown The heavy to a depth of 60 needed to control soil blowing and water erosion.Terrac- Permeabilitytis slow. Available waterches is capacitylt is high. ing also may be needed to control water erosion. depth is 60 inches or more. Surface The ted potential y native vegetation on this ss, and e is blue runoffe fis slow,ve and the erosion hazard is low. crops. It dominated Need sand bluestem, sand ress. sideoats This soil is used almost entirely win ir n itrrigated area manst and a western wheatgrass a are also r, grrma prominent. Potential is suited to all crops commonly grown grain, potatoes, pro ior gsfro nperacre in favora- ing corn, sugar beets, beans, alfalfa, it system is 3 ple years on 1,800 from s in pounds corn for mtag3 cep a rior pounds in sand blues em years a range to 4oyears of alfalfa followedby e cornpp cropping condition deteriorates, the bluestem, sand reedgrass, 890233 ( SOIL SURVEY • 100 TABLE 6.--BUILDING SITE DEVELOPMENT (Some of the terms used in this table to describe restrictive soil features are defined in the text for definitions of slight," moderate," and severe." Absence of an entry means soil was not See _-_- Glossar rated] Small ; Local roads Dwellings commercial ; and l streets Dwellings with builei 6s Shallow ` without ?�— Soil name and excavations basements basements map symbol 1� ,. {Moderate: Moderate: ;Moderate: ; shrink swell, ;Moderate: ; 'hero kswell. frost action. _____ ____;severe: , shrink-swell- ; shrink-swell. 1, 2--- cutbanks cave. Altvan ;Severe: 4 Severe: ;Severe: ; floods, 3A ;Severe: ; floods, ; wetness, 'Severe: {food's floods, ; wetness. pquolls--- ---; floods, ' ; wetness. ; frost action. wetness. wetness. ;Severe: j ;Severe: floods, ' ;Severe; ;;Severe: wetness, ;Severe: : floods, ;Severe: ' floods, ; wetness. • frost action. Aquents-- ; floods, 1 wetness. ; wetness. ,•wetness. ' ;Severe: ;Severe: ; floods, ' ;Severe: ; floods, 4�: }severe: ' fwetness. floods. 'Severe: • {foods, wetness. ; frost action. Aquolls-- —'--'1 floods, e ; wetness. ; wetness. wetness. ;Severe: 4 ' ' ;Severe: �;Severe: ; floods, ; floods, ;Severe: ; floods, ; wetness, AqueP -;Severe: ; floods, ; wetness. ; frost action. is--- ; floods, wetness- ; wetness- ; wetness. ; ' ; ;Moderate: ;Moderate: ' ;Moderate: ' rest action. -;Moderate: low strength. -----------------'Slight--- I low strength. , low strength. II low strength. S Ascalon • t Berate: 'Moderate: ;Moderate: ; frost action, 'Moderate: . low strength. ; slope. ; low strength. -;5116ht"-- - 1 low strength. ; low strength. 6, T- , Ascalon ' 'Moderate: ;Moderate: 'Moderate: ;Moderate: low strength. frost action, • Ilow strength. , ' low strength. I ,Slight----------- low strength. ; • 8, 9---'- ;Severe: Ascalon ; ;Severe: ' ,;Severe: ; flevoods- ; floods. ; ;Severe: ; floods. , ----------------;Severe: floods. ' 10------ ; cutbanks cave, 1 ; Moderate: BanKard ; floods. 'Sltghc--- frost action. -;5116ht___________. , S116ht__________ , _- ;Slight-----------. ; ;Moderate: 11, 12------ ; ; slope. , ,Severe: 3---- r ' ;Moderate: ; slope. , 'Severe: ;Moderate: ; slope. , ' 13--------- cutbanks cave, ; slope- ; Casca�o ;Moderate: ht- ; small stones. ;Slag low strength. !Slight----------- , --_;Slight____- _-_--;;Slight ; ;Mderate: 14, 15---- _;Y.od frail: low strength. Colby , '• ;Slight--- ---" ' 'Slight____ ; slope. ; • ;Slight____-------� ; 16. • 17--- , 'MOAerate: Colby ' __;w..dope. ' : :Slight----------- , low strength 1Co ;5lttht--------- ; slope. 5116ht----------� ; ;Moderate: Colby- ---� ; ;Moderate: ; low strenntt ; ;Moderate: low strength, --;Slight-'- ;Moderate: low strength. : slope.' lou strength. I , r I ` See footnote at end of table. 890233 i ( WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, SOUTHERN PART 103 TABLE 6.--BUILDING SITE DEVELOPMENT--Continued Dwellings Dwellings Small Local roads Soil name and Shallow t with commercial and streets map symbol excavations without — basements basements buildings _ Severe: 6Ul 67 Moderate: Severe: Sshrin -- ,el Severe:-s ell. low strength, Ulm too clayey. shrink-swell. _... _..., shrink-swell. Moderate: Moderate: 68• Severe: Moderate: Moderate: slope. To U rC small stones, slope. slope. slope. Torriorthents cutbanks cave. gy Severe: Slight Slight Slight Slight. Valent cutbanks cave. V Sli ht Slight Moderate: Slight. 70 • Severe: B slope. alent cutbanks cave. 77•' Slight Slight Moderate: Slight. Valent Severe: slope. cutbanks cave. Severe: Severe: Swetne: Severe: Severe: wetness. Loup wetness, wetness, wetness, wetness, floods. floods. cutbanks cave. floods. Slight Slight Moderate: 72 Slight Slight low strength. Vona Moderate: Slight Slight Moderate: low strength. 73, 7y Slight slope. ' Vona Slight Slight Moderate: 75, 76 Slight Slight low strength. Vona Slight Moderate: Moderate:• 77 Slight Slight slope. low strength. Vona 78, 79 Slight Moderate: Moderate: Moderate: Moderate: Weld low nk-swell, low strength, low strength, low strength, shrink-swell. shrink-swell. shrink-swell. shrink frost action. 80 Moderate: Moderate: Moderate: Moderate: Slight low strength, low strength, Weld low strength, low strength, shrink-swell, shrink-swell. shrink-swell• slope,shrink-swell_ frost action. 81•, 82•: Moderate: Moderate: Slight Moderate: . Moderate: F: Wiley low strength, low strength, low strength, low strength, shrink-swell. shrink-swell. shrink-swell. shrink-swell. Slight Moderate: Colby Slight Slight Slight low strength. 83•: Moderate: Moderate: Slight Moderate: Moderate: low strength, Wiley low strength, low strength, low strength, lowt strength. shrink-swell. shrink-swell. Slope,shrink-swell. Slight Moderate: Moderate: Colby Slight Slight slope low strength. - • See map unit description for the composition and behavior of the map unit. I 1 i. 890233 r SOIL SURVEY , 5' 104 TAMLE 7---SANITARY FACILITIES to describe restrictive soil features are defined in the Glossary of "slight," "moderate," "good," "fair," and other terms used to rate soils. [Some of the terms used in this table ofdefinitions means soil was not rated] '--- v cover Absence an entry Area nail_ � Trench ; sanitary for landfill Septic tank Sewage lagoon sanitary landfill --_ ----- Soil name and absorption areas landfill map symbol fields : ;Fair: . ; ;Slight- thin layer . ;Severe: ____;Severe: ' seepage. -;Sl;Slight seepage- ' ;Poor: 1 , 2'----- ;Severe: ; wetness. Altvan ;Severe: wetness- ;Severe: floods, 30: ;Severe: ; floods, wetness. pquolls------------ ; floods, ; wetness- ;Poor: wetness. ;Severe: ; wetness. ;Severe: wetness. ;Severe: floods, ____;Severe: floods, wetness. pquents-- floods, wetness. 1;Poor: wetness- ,;Severe: wetness. ;Severe: uetness- _ ;Severe: floods, Ya: ____;Severe: floods, floods, , wetness. ;Poor: pquoll s----"'- �; wetness- ;Severe: ; wetness. wetness. ;Severe; :Severe: wetness: ;Se ; floods, ,5evere: ; floods. ; wetness. ;Good. AquePts------------; floods, ; wetness- ; wetness. ;Severe: ;Severe: seepage- 1s;Severe: ; seepage. food. I. -;Slight"'- seepage. ;Severe: 5, 6'_"�- ;Severe: ; seseepage- , ' Ascalon ; __;Severe: ; seePa:e• ' ;Slight""------- 1 slope, 7 ; seepage. :Good. Ascalon ;Severe: ;Severe: seepage.__-;Severe: ; seepage. ; ;Fair: _________;S11flht________ ; seepage.8, 9--"" ;Severe: �;S floods. ; too sandy- Ascalon j ;Severe: ' floods, ; ;Severe: • floods, ; seepage. ;G rod. 10-^�""---- ; floods. seePa6e• ,Severe: Bankard ; ;Severe: ; seepage. ____;Severe: ; seepage. ;poor: _____;Slight"'-__-_ ; seepage' 11. 12_________ ;Severe: small 'r I - Dresser ;Severe: ; seepage.ve: ;Severe: , seepage . ____ ;Moderate' ; slope, slope. -� ; seepage,' ' 13-"----- __;G;Good. Caseajo stones. __-- r._-. , small ___;$light----" : ;Slight________ _____;Moderate: ; __;Good. 'Slight______ ; seepage. ; _;Sl lght-____"___ 1C 15, 16--- -""-; ;Slight----------- ; ____;Severe: _;Slight""-_._- ; Slope. ' . ; __;rood. 17--------------- ; ; ;Slight----------- ; . ;Slight Colby slope• ______;Good. ____;Slight____-iSlight;Moderate: _- ;Moderate: ; seepage' • ;Good. Ad ena- peres slowly. slope. • • . ;Moderate: ;Moderate: floods. ; ;Severe: ; floods. ;Moderdse: , floods. -;.Good. _____';Slight_______- 2 -- ; floods. ;Slight-----" Colombo -____;Moderate: ; _;Slight__ ; slope, ; ' 20-- seepage. , Colombo I - See footnote at end of table. B90233 WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, SOUTHERN PART 107 TABLE 7.--SANITART FACILITIES--Continued • Area Daily cover Trench sanitary for landfill Septic tank Sewage lagoon sanitary landfill .—_----- Soil name and areas landfill absorption map symbol fields ;Poor: ;Severe: w 71.: ;Swetne: , wetness, -----------;Severs: , wetness, ; seepage, Loup---- ; floods. I seepage, ; floods. ' s. seepage, floods. ; seepage, ; floods. floods. ;Good. -;Slight--------- ;Severe: :Slight---------" , 'Slight--- ---I seepage. 'Good. Vona 'Slight------- __;Severe: ; ________;Slight- seepage, ; Tu__________ Vona ', ; slope• ; 'Good. -;Slight___________� 'Severe: ;Slight-------'- 75, 76, 77 _______;Slight___________; seepage- 'Good. ' ;Slight----- -"• Vona ` ;Slight--------_" ; 'Moderate: ;Moderate: - ; seepage. _;Good. 78------------------ percs slowly. 'Slight__________ Weld :Slight----------- ;Moderate: ;Moderate: ; slope, ' 79, BD---" -�---- ; percs slowly. : • Weld : seepage. ; 7 ;Slight___________,'F too'cl clayey. •. ' ;Moderate: ;Slight---""----� 81 'Moderate: ' Wiley--- --�--I percs slowly. ; seepage. 'Good.. -:Slight-------- 'Moderate: ;Slight------ ' I -;Slight___-_______; ; Co1bY_____________ , seepage.. _ ;Fair' ;Slight-----'- 'Slight-- ; too clayey. 62• 83'• :Moderate: ' __;Moderate: ; seepage, ` ; Wiley-------------- Peres slowly. _--_--' slope. _;Good. rye- _;slight__________ :Slight Co1bY__-___________;Slight___________ seepage. ; I e unit description for the composition and behavior of the map unit. See map I 890233 108 SOIL SURVEY TABLE 8.--CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS J [Some of the terms used in this table to describe restrictive soil features are defined in the Glossary. See text for definitions of "good," "fair," "poor," and "unsuited." Absence of an entry means soil was not rated] Soil name and Roadfill Sand Gravel Topsoil map symbol Good Fair: Fair: Fair: 1• 2 excess fines. excess fines. thin layer. Altvan 3*: Good ;Fair: Poor: Aquolls Poor: wetness, ; excess fines. oorness. frost action. Poor: Good Fair: Poor: Aquents excess fines. wetness. wetness, frost action. I 40: Unsuited Poor: Aquolls Poor: Unsuited wetness. wetness, frost action. i Unsuited Unsuited Poor: Aquepts Poor: wetness. wetness, frost action. 5, 6, o, 8, 9 Fair: Poor: Unsuited Good. Ascalon low strength, excess fines. frost action, shrink-swell. 10 Fair: Fair: Unsuited Poor: too sandy. Bankard low strength. excess fines. Fair: Poor: Unsuited Fair: 17 small stones. Bresser frost action. excess fines. Good Good Poor: 13 Good small stones. Cascajo 14, 15, 16, 17 Fair: Unsuited Unsuited Good. Co lby low strength. • Igo:Colby Fair: Unsuited Unsuited Good. low low strength. Unsuited Fair: Adena Fair: Unsuited too clayey. low strength. Unsuited Fair: 19, 20 Fair: Unsuited too clayey. Colombo low ttaction. frost action. Good Good Fair: 21, Good; too clayey. Baconon° • 23, 24 Fair: Unsuited Unsuited Good. . Fort Collins low strength. Fair: Unsuited Unsuited Good. 75, 26 low strength. Meyerson Unsuited Unsuited Poor: 2T, d28t Poor: too clayey. Heldt lo strength. low strength. See footnote at end of table. i " 890233 ( 110 SOIL SURVEY TABLE 8.--CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS--Continued Soil name and Roadfill Sand Gravel Topsoil map symbol T -- . 60': Renohill Poor: Unsuited Unsuited Poor: low strength, thin layer. thin layer. 61 Poor: Unsuited Unsuited Poor: Tassel thin layer, area reclaim. area reclaim. 62, 63 Poor: Unsuited: Unsuited: Fair: Terry thin layer, thin layer. thin layer. small stones. area reclaim. r 64, 65 Poor: Unsuited Unsuited Good. Thedalund thin layer. 66, 67 Poor: Unsuited Unsuited Fair: Ulm shrink-swell, too clayey. low strength. 68• Good Good . Good Poor: Ustic Torriorthents small stones, too sandy. 69, 70 Good Fair Unsuited Poor: Valent too sandy. 71•: [ Valent Good Fair Unsuited Poor: too sandy. Loup Poor: Fair: Unsuited: Poor: wetness. excess fines. excess fines. wetness. 1 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77 Fair: Poor: Unsuited Good. Vona low strength. excess fines. 78, 79, 80 Fair: Unsuited Unsuited Fair: Weld low strength, too clayey. shrink-swell, frost action. i 81• 82•, 83•: Fair: Wiley Fair: Unsuited Unsuited L low strength, too clayey. shrink-swell. Colby Fair: Unsuited Unsuited Good. low strength. • See map unit description for the composition and behavior of the map unit. • 690233 i 124 SOIL SURVEY TABLE 12.--ENGINEERING PROPERTIES AND CLASSIFICATIONS (The symbol < means less than; > means greater than. Absence of an entry means data were not estimated] -- Classification ;Frag- Percentage passing Soil name and Depth USDA texture :ments sieve number-- Liquid Plas- map symbol Unified AASHTO > 3 limit ticity inches 4 10 40 200 index . In Pct Pct 1, 2 0-10 Loam CL-ML A-4. 0 90-100 85-100 60-95 50-75 20-30 5-10 Altvan 10-25 Clay loam, loam CL A-6, A-7 0 95-100 95-100 85-100 70-80 35-50 15-25 25-60 Sand and gravel SP, SP-SM A-1 0 75-95 70-90 25-35 0-10 --- NP 3':Aquolls 0-48 Variable --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---48-60 Sand, gravelly SP, SP-SM A-1 0-10 60-90 50-70 30-50 0-10 --- t1P sand. Aquents 0-48 Variable --- --- --- --- __- -' 48-60 Sand and gravel SP, SP-SM A-1 0-10 60-90 50-70 30-50 0-10 --- NP 4': Aquolls 0-60 Variable --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- Aquepts 0-60 Variable --- --- --- --- --- --- --- -- 5, 6, 7 0-R Sandy loam SM A-2, A-4 0 95-100 90-100 70-95 25-50 15-25 NP-5 Ascalon 8-18 Sandy clay loam SC, CL A-6 0 95-100 90-100 80-100 40-55 20-40 10-20 18-60 Sandy loam, SC, A-4, A-6 0' 95-100 95-100 75-95 35-65 20-40 5-15 sandy clay SM-SC, loam, fine CL, sandy- loam. CL-ML 8, 9 0-8 Loam SM A-2, A-4 0 95-100 90-100 70-95 25-50 15-25 NP-5 Ascalon 8-18 Sandy clay loam SC, CL A-6 0 95-100 90-100 80-100 40-55 20-40 10-20 18-60 Sandy loam, SC, A-4, A-6 0 95-100 95-100 75-95 35-65 20-40 ' 5-15 sandy clay SM-SC, loam, tine CL, sandy loam. CL-ML 10 0-4 Sandy loam SM A-2, A-4 0 95-100 90-100 60-70 30-40 --- NP Rankard 4-60 Fine sand, sand, SP-SM, SM A-2, 0-5 70-100 60-100 40-70 5-25 --- NP gravelly sand. A-3, A-1 11, 12 0-16 Sandy loam SM A-1, A-2 0 95-100 75-100 35-50 20-35 15-25 NP-5 Dresser 16-25 Sandy clay loam SC A-2, 0 95-100 75-100 50-70 30-50 30-55 10-25 A-6, A-7 25-30 Sandy loam, SC, SM-SC A-2, A-1 0 90-100 60-100 30-60 20-30 25-35 5-15 coarse sandy loam, gravelly sandy loam. 30-60 Loamy coarse SP-SC A-2, A-1 0-5 80-100 35-85 20-50 5-10 20-30 5-10 sand, gravelly loamy sand, - very gravelly loamy sand. I 13 0-9 Gravelly sandy CM A-1, A-2 0-15 50-65 50-60 15-40 10-35 --- NP Cascajo loam.9-31 Very gravelly CP-CM, A-1 0-15 15-50 15-50 5-30 0-20 ___ NP sandy loam, GP, GM very gravelly loamy sand, very gravelly . sand. 31-60 Very gravelly CP, SP, A-1 0-15 10-60 10-60 5-30 0-10 , --- NP loamy sand, GP-CM, very gravelly SP-SM ] sand, gravelly sand. See footnote at end of table. 890233 r 128 SOIL SURVEY TABLE 12.--ENGINEERING PROPERTIES AND CLASSIFICATIONS--Continued Classification :Frag- Percentage passing i Soil name and ;Depth USDA texture :ments sieve number-- ;Liquid Plas- Unified AASHTO > 3 ; limit [icily i map symbol inches 4 10 40 : 200 Incex In Pct r---;-- Pct -_ NP 72, 74 0-6 Loamy sand SM A-2 0 100 90-100;60-90 15-30 --- UP Vona 6-28 Fine 3 sandy loam, SM A-2, A-4 0 100 90-100;60-90 30-45 sandy loam. 28-60 Sandy loam, SM A-2 0 100 go-100;50 --- NP -85 15-30 loamy sand. 75, 76, 77 0-6 Sandy loam SM A-2, A-4 0 100 90-100;60-90 30-45 --- UP A-4 0 100 90-100;60-90 30-45NP Vona 6-28 Fine sandy loam, SM A-2, sandy loam. 100 90-100;50-85 15-30 --- NP 28-60 Sandy loam, SM A-2 0 loamy sand. -- A_4 0 100 95-100 85-100 60-85 20-30 NP-10 78, 79, 80 0-8 Loam ML, Weld CL-ML • 8-15 Silty clay loam, CL .A-6, A-7 0 100 100 95-100 85-95 35-50 15-30 silty clay. . 15-60 Silt loam, loam CL-ML, CL A-4, A-6 0 100 95-100 85-100 60-85 20-35 5-15 81•, 82•, 83•: Wiley 0-110 1 Silt loam CL-ML, CL A_6, A-6 0 100 100 90-100 70-90 25-35 5-15 100 .90-100 70-95 ; 25-35 10-2n • 11-60 Silty clay loam, CL n silt loam. Colby 0-7 Loam CL-ML A-4 0 100 100 :90-100 85-100: 25-30 5-10 7-60 Silt loam, loam CL-ML A-4 0 100 100 ;90-100 85-100; 25-30 5-10 • See map unit description for the composition and behavior of the map unit. I`t • • • i I 890233 ( WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, SOUTHERN PART 129 TABLE 13•--PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF SOILS [The symbol < means less than; > means greater then. The erosion tolerance factor (T) is for the entire profile. Absence of an entry means data were not available or were not estimated) Risk orosion rosion, ind ------c—or--- factors;erodi- -� ;biliiy eater ,reaction eu.11 Uncoated ;Concrete Soil name and Depth; Permea- ;Available; Soil Salinity Shrink- g T roue_ b ility ; otential steel map symbol :ca acit n hr In in EH Mmhos/cm n 0.24 3 ; 5 __ Lou Moderate ;Low O 28 1, 2 O-1O; 0.6-2.0 ;0.20-0.24; 6.6-7.8 Moderate ;Low 0.70 Altvan 1O-25: 0.6-2.0 ;0.75-0.17 7. -8.4 <2 Moderate Moderate ;Low 25-6O: >2O ;0.02-0.04 7.44-9.0 <2 Low 3'• -- High Moderate ;--- Aquolls 8-6O . i.< 48-6O; >2O ;0.04-0.06 7.4-8-V 2-16 Lou g ; O-48.1 --- High Moderate --- Aquents 48-6O; >2O :0.04-0.06 7.4-8.4 2-16 Low , Y': ' --- ___ Aquolls Aquepts O-6O1 --- --- --- --- Lou 10.77 5 3 ;0.17 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 O-8 1 0.6-6.0 :0.1 -0.15; 6.6-7.8 <2 Low C2 Modera Low te Moderate Low 24 Ascalon 8- 0: 0.6-6.0 ;0.133-0.15; 6.9-8.8 Low 1O.2u t8-66O: 0.6-6.O :0.17-0.151 T.9-8.q <2 Lou Moderate ;p.t0 5 3 : <2 Low Moderate Lou O-4 : 2.0-6.0 ;0.05-0.081 7.4-8.4 Moderate Low ;0.10 1O <2 Lou Bankard q-6O: 6.0-20 :0.05-0.081 7.Y-8.4 .p,10 5 2 ___ Low Low Low O-25: 0.6-6.0 ;0.71-0.18: 6.1-7.3 ___ Moderate Low :0.15 11, 12 --- Low ;0.10 Bresser t6-25: 0.6-2.0 :0.15-0.18; 6.6-7.3 --- Low Lou Low 1p-1O; 25-3O1 2.0-2.0 :0.15-0.081 6.6-7.3 Low Low Low 3O-6O: 2.0-20 ;0.05-0.08; 6.6-7.3 Moderate Lou :0.10; 5 . 8 0-9 1 2.0-6.0 :0.07-0.091 7.4-8.4 , <2 Low Moderate Low 10.10; 13 <2 Lou :0.10: Cascajo 9-31: 6.0-20 ;0.05-0.08; 7.4-8.4 <2 Low Moderate Low ; 31-6O: 6.0-20 :0.05-0.06: T.Y-8.4 1 Moderate Lou------:O-37; 5 I 4C O-7 1 0.6-2.0 10.20-0.241 6.6-8.4 ; <2 Low Moderate Lou 10.37; 14,C by 16, 67 7_6O: 0.6-2.0 :0.17-0.22; 7.4-8.4 <2 Low Colby 1 1 yL 1 Moderate Low :0.37; 5 1 18': : <z Low :0.37: Colby 7-7 : 0.6-2.0 ;0.27-0.22: 7.6-8.4 : Moderate Lou T-6O: 0.6-2.0 10.77-0.22: 7.Y-8.4 <2 Low Moderate ,Low :0.37: 5 5 O-6 1 0.6-2.0 :0.18-0.211 6.6-7.8 1 <2 Low High ,Low :0.24: I. Adena 6-9 ,0.06-0.2 10.16-0.181 6.6-7.8 : <2 High High :Low :0.24: 4 9-6O1 0.6-2.0 :0.16-0.18: 7.4-8.Y <2 Lou xi • . h-___-:Low :0.3�: 5 5 1 <2 Lou g :Low :0.321 19, 2O 4-211 0.6-2.0 :0.14-0.16: 7.4-8.4 1 10.28:<2 Moderate High Colombo 74-21: 0.6-2.0 10.14-0.16: 7.4-8.4 1 <2 Lou High---"":Lou 1 2t-60: 10.6-2.0 10.14-0.161 7.4-8.Y : 10.28: 3 : 5 ' <2 Moderate Moderate :Low 1O 24: 0-21: 0.2-0.6 10.15-0.21: 6.6-7.8 : <2 High High-----:Low 21, 22 ;Low ;0.152 Oacono 12-211 0.2-0.6 10.15-0.21; 7.4-8.8 : <2 Moderate High ;Lou ;0.10; I 2t-60: 0.2-2.0 :0.03-0.051 7.4-8.4 : High 1 27'60: >2O :0.03-0.05: T.Y-8.q <2 Low '0.201 5 , 6 : Moderate ;Low-- Low 0.20; 23. tY 7-T : 0.6-2.0 ;0.16-0. 18: 6.6-7.8 ' <2 Moderate Moderate :Lou------:O.2O: Fort Collins 7- 11: 0.6-2.0 10.66-0.18: 7.4-7.8 : High tt-6O: 0.6-2.0 :0.16-0.08: 7.4-8.tl <2 Lou High jLau :O.28: 5 ' 4L 1 Lou 10.2.8 p-4 1 0.6-2.0 :0.14-0.18; 7.4-8.4 1 <8 Low High--""-' 25, 26 4_6O1 0.6-2.0 10.14-0.18: 7•Y-B-Y : <8 Lou 1 4 Haverson <8 High High-"-""7HiBh----- 0.25; 5 1 27, 28 0-60:0.06-0.6 ;0.02-0.771 7.9-9.0 : , 1 Heldt , : See footnote at end of table. 890233 pm l V/ELD COUNTY, COLORADO, SOUTHERN PART 131 TABLE 13•--PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF SOILS--Continued Risk of corrosion Erosion Wind Soil name and Depth Perinea- Available; Soil Salinity Shrink- factors erodi- map symbol bility water reaction swell Uncoated Concrete ----- bility capacity potential steel K 1 T ' group In In/hr In/in Et Mmhos/Cm 60•: - Renohill 0-9 0.2-0.6 0.17-0.21 6.6-7.8 <2 Moderate High Low 0.37 3 6 9-32 0.06-0.2 0.14-0. 16 6.6-8.4 <2 High High Low 0.321 32 --- 61 0-11 2.0-6.0 0.16-0.18 7.4-8.4 <2 Low High Low 0.24: 1 3 Tassel 11 --- --- --- --- '"" 62, 63 0-6 2.0-6.0 0. 13-0.15 7.0-7.8 <2 Low Moderate Low 0.201 2 3 Terry 6-18 2.0-6.0 ,0.13-0.15 7.0-7.8 <2 Low Moderate Low 0.20: 18-37 2.0-6.0 ;0.13-0.15 7.9-8.4 . <2 Low High Low 0.201 37 -"- '-- 64, 65 0-8 0.6-2.0 0.16-0.18 7.9-8.4 <2 Low High Low 0.32 2 4L Thedalund 8-25 0.6-2.0 0.16-0.18 7.9-8.4 <2 Low High Low 0.32 25 --- --- --- 66, --- 67 0-5 0.6-2.0 0.16-0.18 6.6-7.8 --- Low High Low 0.32 5 6 Ulm 5-19 0.06-0.2 0.19-0.21 7.4-8.4 <2 High High Low 0.37 19-60 0.6-2.0 0.19-0.21 7.9-8.4 ' <2 Moderate High Low 0.37 68' 0-60 --- Ustic Torriorthents 69, 70 0-8 6.0-20 0.07-0.12 6.6-7.3 --- Low Low Low 0.10 5 , 1 Valent 8-60 6.0-20 0.05-0.10 6.6-7.8 <2 Low Low Low 0.10 71': i Valent 0-8 6.0-20 0.07-0.12 6.6-7.3 --- Low Low Low 0.10 5 1 8-60 6.0-20 0.05-0.10 6.6-7.8 <2 Low Low Low 0.10 Loup 0-16 6.0-20 0.10-0.14 6.6-8.4 <2 Low High Low 0.17 5 2 16-60 6.0-20 0.06-0.08 7.4-8.4 <2 Low High Low 0.17 72. 73, 74 0-6 6.0-20 0.09-0.11 6.6-7.3 --- Low Low Low 0.10 5 2 Vona 6-28 2.0-6.0 0.12-0.14 6.6-8.4 <4 Low High Low 0.10 28-60 6.0-20 0.08-0.11 7.4-8.4 -<4 Lou High Low 0.10 75. 76, 77 0-6 2.0-6.0 0.11-0.13 6.6-7.3 Low Lou Low 0.10 5 3 Vona 6-28 2.0-6.0 0.12-0.14 6.6-8.4 <4 Low High Low 0.10 28-60 6.0-20 0.08-0.11 7.4-8.4 <4 Low High Low 0.10 78, 79, 80 0-8 0.6-2.0 0.16-0.21 6.6-7.3 <2 Low Low Low 0.32 5 6 Weld 8-15 0.06-0.2 0.19-0.21 6.6-7.8 <2 High Moderate Low 0.28 15-60 0.6-2.0 0.16-0.21 7.4-8.4 <2 Low High Low 0.28 81', 82', 83•: �' Wiley 0-11 0.6-2.0 0.19-0.21 7.4-7.8 <2 Low High Low 0.371 5 4L 11-60 0.6-2.0 0.19-0.21 7.9-8.4 <2 Moderate High Low 0.371 Colby 0-7 0.6-2.0 0.20-0.24 6.6-8.4 <2 Low Moderate Low 0.371 5 4L 7-60 0.6-2.0 0.17-0.22 7.4-8.4 <2 Low Moderate Low 0.371 • See map unit description for the composition and behavior of the map unit. I I -a, 890233 r 132 SOIL SURVEY e TABLE 1A.--SOIL AND WATER FEATURES t. [Absence of an entry indicates the feature is not a concern. See for descriptions of symbols and such terms as "rare," "brief," and "perched." The symbol < means Liss than; > means greater than] Flooding Higj water table Bedrock Soil name and Hydro- - Potential map symbol logic Frequency Duration Months Depth Kind Months 'Depth Hard- frost group ness action rt In 1 2 B None --- >6.0 --- , --- >60 --- Moderate. Alty an 3.: Aquolls 0 Frequent---- Brief Apr-Jun 0.5-1.0 Apparent:Apr-Jun >60 High. Aquents 0 Frequent---- Brief Apr-Jun 0.5-1.0 Apparent:Apr-Jun >60 --- High. Aquolls D Frequent---- Brief Apr-Jun 0.5-1.5 Apparent Apr-Jun >60 --- High. _ Aquepts 0 Frequent---- Brief Apr-Jun 0.5-1.5 Apparent Apr-Jun >60 --- High. 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 B None --- --- >6.0 --- --- >60 --- Moderate. Ascalon 10 A Frequent---- Brief Mar-Jun >6.0 --- --- >60 --- Low. Bankard 11, 12 B None --- >6.0 --- ; --- >60 --- Moderate. Bresser 13 A None --- >6.0 --- --- >60 --- Low. Ca sca jo 14, 15, 16, 17---- B None . _-_ --- >6.0 --- --- >60 --- Low. Colby 18': --- >60 --- Lau. Colby B None --- --- >6.0 --- Adena C None _-- --- >6.0 --- --- >60 --- Low. ' 19, 20 B Rare --- --- >6.0 --- --- , >60 --- Moderate. Colombo 21, 22 C None --- --- >6.0 --- >60 --- Low. Bacono 23, 24 8 None to ra --- --- >6.0 --- --- >60 --- Low. re - Fort Collins • 25. 26 B Rare to Brief May-Sep >6.0 --- --- >60 --- Low. Haverson common. 27, 28 C None __- --- >6.0 --- --- >60 --- Low. ' ' Heldt 29, 30 A None --- --- >6.0 --- --- 1 >60 --- Moderate. Julesburg 31, 32, 33, 3N---- B None ___ --- >6.0 --- --- >60 --- Low. Kim 35': -( Loup D Rare to Brief Mar-Jun ..5-1.5 Apparent Nov-May >60 Moderate. common. Boel A Occasional Brief Mar-Jun 1.5-3.5 Apparent Nov-May >60 --- Moderate. 36•: --- ,10-20 Rip- Lou. Midway D None --- --- >6.0 pable See footnote at end of table. QQ ' WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, SOUTHERN PART 133 TABLE 14.--SOIL AND WATER FEATURES--Continued Flooding High water table Bedrock Soil name and ;Hydro- Potential map symbol ; logic Frequency Duration 1 Months Depth Kind 'Months Depth Hard- frost ;group ness action -- Ft In 36•: Shingle D None --- --- >6.0 --- --- 10-20 Rip- Low. pable 37. 38 B None --- --- >6.0 --- --- 20-40,Rip- Low. Nelson pable 39, 40, 41 , 42, 43 C None --- --- >6.0 --- --- >60 --- Moderate. Nunn .. 44, 45, 46, 47, 48 B None _-- --- >6.0 --- --- >60 --- Low. Olney 49 A None --- --- >6.0 --- --- >60 : --- Lol. Osgood 50, 51 , 52, 53---- B None -__ --- >6.0 -_- --- >60 ; --- Low. Otero 54, 55 B None to rare --- --- >6.0 --- : --- >60 --- Moderate. Paoli 56, 57 C None --- --- >6.0 --- --- 20-40;Rip- Low. Renohill pable 58, 59 D None --- >6.0 --- --- 10-20 Rip- Low. : --- Shingle pable 60•: Shingle ; D None --- --- >6.0 --- --- 10-20 Rip- Low. pable Renohill C None --- --- >6.0 --- --- 20-40 Rip- Low. pable•61 D None --- --- >6.0 --- --- 10-20 Rip- Low. Tassel pable 62, 63 8 None --- --- >6.0 --- --- 20-40 Rip- Low. Terry pable 64, 65 C None ; --- --- >6.0 --- --- 20-40 Rip- Low. Thedalund pable 66, 67 C None --- --- >6.0 --- --- >60 --- Low. Ulm .. 68• A None __- --- >6.0 --- --- >60 --- Low. Ustic Torriorthents 69, 70 A None --- --- >6.0 --- , --- >60 --- Low. Valent 71•: Valent A None --- --- >6.0 --- -- >60 --- Low. Loup D Rare to Brief Mar-Jun ..5-1.5 Apparent Nov-May >60 --- Moderate. common. 72, 73, 74, 75, --- >6.0 --- --- >60 --- ;Low. 76, 77 B None --- Vona See footnote at end of table. EXHIBIT E WV 233 I Empire Laboratories, Inc. P.0 Bo.503 • 1303)484.0359 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING& MATERIALS TESTING 301 No Howes • Pon ColI.ns.Cobraoo 80522 November 19, 1986 Rocky Mountain Consultants 500 Coffman Longmont, Colorado 80501 Attention: Mr. Ken Dell Gentlemen: . We are pleased to submit our Report of a Geotechnical Investigation prepared for the proposed N.C.M. church located on the east frontage road of I-25 at Del Camino in Weld County, Colorado. Based upon our findings in the subsurface, we feel that the site is suitable for the proposed construction, providing the design criteria and recommendations set forth in this report are met. The accompanying report presents our findings in the subsurface and our recommendations based upon these findings. • Very truly yours, i EMPIRE LA ORATORIES, INC. ,..A>��<<"Irrt••`"r(/74 t {294:il `.• PRA A `< • 3.--1/4.'.' .1.• g v Li_ ` Ji 15716 Edward J. Paas, P.E. = : y Branch Manager 'gr-. .tip Reviewed by: moo, 1SIONaLfe .. Miuloo01110" • je/ Sr cg/` Q(/I p7 PROF ::° " Engineering Geologist ��s�;F1GtE yru.'..c4S,cr s_zt VI /.7575 f9s o 1 1 - N. P,F , . -. Branch Offices "Soisit.i P.O.Box 10076P.O.Box 1105P.O.Box 1711lonOmom,Colorado 80502 Greeley Colorado 60632 CIMYenM,WYominq 82003 i' (303)776.3921 (303)3510160 (307)632-922• / MemOer of Consulting Engineers Council �!��233 li Geology The proposed site is located within -the Colorado Piedmont section of the Great Plains physiographic province. The Colorado Piedmont, formed during Late Tertiary and Early Quaternary time (approximately sixty-five million (65, 000,000) years ago) , is a broad, erosional trench which separates the SouthernRocky Mountains from the High Plains. Structurally, the property lies along the western flank of the Denver Basin. During the Late Mesozoic and Early Cenozoic Periods (approximately seventy million (70, 000, 000) years ago), intense tectonic activity occured, causing the uplifting of the Front Range and the associated downwarping of the Denver Basin to the east. Relatively flat uplands and broad valleys characterize the present-day topography of the Colorado Piedmont in this region. The site is overlain by alluvial deposits of Modern Time. The alluvial deposits are underlain by siltstones and claystones of either the Pierre, Laramie or Fox Hills Formations The contact of these three formations underlie the site. No bedrock outcrops were encountered at the site, and the bedrock was encountered below the alluvial gravels at depths ranging from nineteen ( 19) to twenty-one (21) feet below the surface. The regional dip of the bedrock in this area is anticipated to be relatively flat and in an easterly direction. Seismic activity in the area is anticipated to be low; therefore, from a structur?' standpoint, the site should be relatively stable. Due to the relatively flat nature of the site, geologic hazards due to mass movement, such as landslides, mudflows, etc., are not anticipated. With proper site grading around the structures and adequate drainage for streets and paved areas, erosional problems should also be minimal. The property lies within the drainage basin ofdhe St. Vrain Creek but according to Rocky Mountain Consultants, Inc. , does not lie within the one hundred (100) year floor plain of the creek. (4) III _ Therefore, the site should not be subject to extensive flooding by St. Vrain Creek. The property is underlain by a layer of sand and gravel. Approximately three (3) to five (5) feet of overburden material overlies the gravel, and the gravel layer extends to the bedrock below at depths of nineteen ( 19) to twenty- one (21) feet. In general, the sand and gravel material encountered consists of hard, durable fragments suitable for use in construction materials. Geologic conditions at the site are such that, in our opinion, the site is not underlain at economic depths by coal, limestone or quarry rock. Radiation hazards at the site may be higher than normal rates in the area due to the fact that the site is underlain by sand and gravels. The sand and gravel is composed of igneous and metamorphic rocks derived from the mountains to the west and may contain uranium-related minerals. A detail study of radon gas or radiation hazards at the site is beyond the scope of this report. It is suggested that a more detailed study be made prior to construction to more accurately determine radiation hazards at the site and make recommen- dations regarding remedial actions if needed. Site Grading S Utilities It is recommended that the topsoil containing roots and organic matter, which extends to a depth of approximately four (4) to six (6) inches, be removed from the area of the proposed building. This topsoil should be stockpiled for future landscaping use. The subgrade should then be scarf ie to a depth of six (6) inches and recompacted at or near optimum moisture to ninety percent (90$) of Standard Proctor Density ASTM D 698-78. (See Appendix C.) On-site soils or granular soils approved by the geotechnical engineer are suitable for use as fill in the proposed building area. All fill underlying (5) 33 EXHIBIT F 390233 l Planned Unit Development Change of Zone AFFIDAVIT OF IUTEREST OWNERS SURFACE ESTATE Application No. Subject Property A Part of the Southwest Quarter (SW 1/4) of Section 2, Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, Weld County, Colorado STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. COUNTY OF WELD ) THE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn, states that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names, addresses and the corresponding Parcel Identification Number assigned by the Weld County Assessor of the owners of property (the surface estate) within five hundred (500) feet or the property subject to the application. This list was compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor, or an ownership update from a title or abstract company or attorney, derived from such records, or from the records of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. The list compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor shall have been assembled within thirty (30) days of the application submission date. NELSON ENGINEERS Arthur F. Uhrillch The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to before// me this /4th.L. day / Qif'£rn2 / , 19 by afyiz, zat. J Set_ WITNESS my hand and official seal. My Commission expires: i/ /j• �� /off d)0,(,-J Not Public 390233 • Planned Unit Development Change of Zone NAMES OF OWNERS OF PROPERTY WITHIN 500 FEET Please print or type NAME ADDRESS, TOWN/CITY, ASSESSOR'S PARCEL STATE AND ZIP CODE IDENTIFICATION # State of Colorado 6060 Broadway Department of Fish and Game Denver, Colorado 80216 1313-03-000-039 State of Colorado 6060 Broadway Department of Fish and Game Denver, Colorado 80216 1313-03-000-038 Rademacher Family 3525 Highway 119 Partnership Ltd. Longmont, Colorado 80501 1313-03-000-040 Stener J. and 4111 Glade Road Francis E. Carlson Loveland, Colorado 80537 1313-03-000-016 Clarence J. and 1203 Princeton Court Vivian P. Evers Longmont, Colorado 80501 1313-03-000-037 3336 East 32nd Street Chevron LISA Tulsa, Oklahoma 74135 1313-03-000-035 436 Coffman Street Fifthcoff Co. Longmont. Colorado 80501 1313-11-000-nAt 6999 York Street St. Vrain Land Co. Denver. Colorado 80779 1319-07-nnn_n63 Larry Gordon 10351 Santa Monica Blvd. c/o Stan Schneider Los Ang-les Calif 90075 7914-07_nnn_OGg Milton L. and 6750 East Eastman Avenue S. Kaha Denver Colorado 80774 1919_n9_non_nS/. 6999 York Street St. Vrain Land Co. Denver, Colorado 80229 1313-02-000-004 • 1__ • t�s►vlfiv� EXHIBIT G 890233 Planned Unit Development Change of Zone AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS MINERALS AND/CR SUBSURFACE Application No. Subject Property A Part of the Southwest Quarter (SW 1/4), Section 2, Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, Weld County. Colorado STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. COUNTY OF WELD THE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn, states that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names and addresses of all mir.--al owners and lesses of mineral owners on or under the parcel of land which is the subject of the application as their names appear upon the records in the Weld County Clerk and Recorder's Office, or from an ownership update from a title or abstract company or an attorney. NELSON ENGINEERS Arthur F. Uh ich • • The foregoing�� instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me this je/� /day of Ate,,-772/4,4 • 19ff WITNESS my hand and official seal.My Commission expires: 4,2a 75/ ,A9/y 4is� 4 s ib4 a 390233 Hello