The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About930141.tiff 1 uxeu,� R6EW — • ''iei RI=os°.Axle°.o 02/23/91 ':r:a> nu2�no..r o.co -- - � % '1 ✓ r, uev ev r am a e w $I I NOTES: 00 nn� y� r� _________ -..Rey • .�.. . x. ?report).,.RAM er, .. I\N 088 xs- PROJECT AREA 1 easex' PC I \ I p ✓/! �e_ 65 /,- EL\O\mm 1 r// I I I m.eba CO [asst 111 Op+/ 776-2447 / _T // / 1 Longmont.me 14••=, °" / L: `` 028 0 \ ' (,' / - `— / as,i and gYlvie '-:ts y I;k. " '• \ / /r se?°es«} \ % \\,I 1 / Longmont,1CO easel ` a.020 1 • \ / / / m.oa eo lot[aa.m. on ne3 PTAH Paget/•��-.4 i .-- -, I I / / - 1 v oi<e feat r:na°'ueoe'6i vicini:im:.:x.ir topographic[sap 1.+: ti i ..j /i I / �� \ // / 1 no.beet..uee,e mm,.am x.oY.[.e • 1 1 I i • I'�) ) "' V I \ unlr OF A / - `I 4. F S V mess or sro VICINITY MAP /� z I \\ \ EXCAVATION _ IeeYl"`E m i CONSISTS E PAW IN ING THE MATERIAL L •'e�iJJ'I" \ Oh Fqt/ ecn; PHa�s ccwsan OP PROCESSING Stale- VICINITY ) \ \ /'/ / /.... 1 2 PHASE T preara T oN-SITE MATERIAL DURING-TEAM 2-4- e wl 11 MINING \ // - ,�e�JL / I ~ WRINJ MEARS L 6.OP E%TRKTING CN-91TE K£REfy.6e 1 I- - / / {FYayM�,gp ,:' AALT Jy/' '� EXCAVATION. II AREA / 1 . '� ''yi y.C' E i/I/ I i .3� WELL 1/ TANKS 1 '' • li I o d � / ENTRANCE• USR - 886 /� PROJECT AREA 1 / I S \�� j "raN ✓ L' S�P`."��6 ,�` �' I \ p5�mvCCRUSHe991N r /�- �- -i ^ [/j4 1 'SF^ EL T9nl\,_ I �� P.eR i}FlANT/ Maw"IG / Aft' �"--4',h4 4.,,A . la 41�„di I �""�".:\ — IZ / H. `T bi 1 // iwJm a \ / 1 I. • �,•1A £ i../ /,' fi� -----1--..N. r / / 1 ,\ // LEGAL DESLWPIION8 APPROVAL LERIRICATES I 4 SOILSMAP • / G(� / R>R.RJQ 1• ..m mRo[,..^....^.,x.mmm. .m....r. // i�' _] Ir &StLa:: I Ef6lJ n,•m aaa in Inc. i/P� SEE< ExlrSOILS OE6LRIPTION5 �^ ..u.xx / LLgIIL TRUCHS WILL_stso.T. mS/ HAUL TRU4O ANO A(Y'.°r—a°FYI"moire°•."ALA.'"min... • Aymisa um FROM TXE $dflH. e.....o ^°a aw.,... etsysyty Amman., :+ww eye.Ara �°°'...�'ir u.':'i�• SECTION 20.T2N,RBBW.1.L....4.ns.o o•.....-o•••••Aga bane eyeal eyesnysthysess on., ftedennia, a, '.x^'^ ..m+.r m"'"u wr r.rr.am.me amHme J �I,\ .n .nu° m ^ HAM a awe �``'J- nu ..m. Ay lye An`, _ _ m deme•YAW wag tits r^.^a^ I•'IININ4 AREA—E9.ao Ac. I/ -y,•#i '• ,[ AAA moyil_•desa.wd.way'.`., 4�roa.m mmu......., PFVEES51Nq $ITE-10.22 Ac. 1,1 ti l me w...� ee..teeny m.x.eu..m02 - .y. th.e`. nti�.talmYbe'e:..�"-6„.. OIL WELL TAPIRS- : .tai .I.x. e..'�•...,.x *weeny seas Aft en. wYgpta Aey.E..o'e.the w K O-IS Pe. j`y/ gten°G'.[,.t ,.,a�',,,u'm°°..ee a..,°.........•.......re'°.: �~ ...r ..n:r:°."°w. TOTAL AREA —40.00 Ac. fsd,a.f T c.�1e,....II A.:. .--'� ,.a antra . LE EIJP: nova..,6,,....,[.,.s..rY.c Aasm u ...pry._ m4son Se PROPERTY 4N6 Pea.x.cwe,. nate—=..gym . USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW ti� '^—"' EXRTIIyQ CON(ONR xeaa auae ae<,e Wew wlmw Wr^a�.ti wwe.ear yAy my .drrraym.y a ,_r ,65 ar-o an se yoned w.a.La up an.m __� �y „ OF EXCAVATION PERMIT PLAN MAP • ew�mrruv; umremY w'•4'^..r Mx..e..�Yr.W• ( POND�LJJRE Center _ Yeerr r+�^ru.. q rr..... Leavy.,COve,aa ea".e,'.n sei��e��.ulr•.r r.rue ..ru.0 rs ea , • e,x .n.:�. —x... ,Wy :A. r.....04 .. ® STOCKPILE WILLIAM Tie t tttzt. ::,,.,.r..a S SITE • msx .ow. �' a �r TRCFPIC FWW 'CO osesi i..........rr+R rrmr� ors mes..tw ru-i OSB PPRCGLS kg-kW Ybxa-xax ees 0 DMA crb Llf al.AEc1-�C-)ON'di-TO Yv1H FEET se. yaws Thy Yeah weals syea.a be,hened Am rpm r e�„ �_a` ,• TAE °,..[6 ex ab REVISIONS AGGREGATE MINING & PROCESSING On r .--.-� Ay A.yea r �,-()� SHRUBS .Lo.eeo.c,co aa,oR "-"' T TALE A�PwEGep A^TE,INC. EXHIBIT " emoo ru,ers+'. uir�'..�.r�.w eery,.s y.:R^rer.,,'p `W a f u.°uw... CAM COMPANIES IN 1 B EM 11990 Gram 1 410 - tE a"'rr•.v. ^'°`ab _ LeAgy...,CO aasex M 3 Dem[Colorado 80233 COLORADO goon SHEET '... B011452-6611 ' DATE PROJECT BFICI 1 OP 2 ' I1' - yr.RF)PMFNT 'ATANDAR0A no 3nne99 03/n/n I Incomes Y °/0C O` '' £ D� NECOMMEPCED SOFD MX. • • r 14a—[f6anlw-ape elu:a dwar.T Y<av 4mI[ -' r n<5 not Wr 011001070 CL[ll rl 013 CO, ___• ___ ] $ I bfl. I I la forlity mue1°m w nasal.mle.nW°rl 0100 anicn°01 . .J- g 1 .r /f5 I °teonte.0tr00 a of wra.`au l'°mu nl<ces and :mjfpuar In tto.' 1. --.'-_�\ r I Intonei w.u�pre.. *0n 0 . 14.0 CO e.a aria. / I I o. I •wr.Ur*a..e ' 081 0. ,00.08!.1 Ot <N. vl.n , :ATM Foal /• • per.a.at t 1<tlal.4°i lei.iir 1.0.0.. .wewr l :. / I .II, 1 I 1 Tn..a..medic.re...e..0..ua..40.m a anal Er'1 _, J I ,_..._.�/ I Ifa f0rman.s.0ed I.planned,lb..Jw9 rata Mate be.&awe. 1. m.�asan„...1 operation nano�P1T um notion u< I - / .M-^—^" I- a canned m.0.....r.I.n°April m. of r rpua9 Ordinance.fma.My violation of ea: L C 1 — / • /' .009010 i m..Onaoa1 a 9.mn°a m of Section 44.4I —/z' - — _ `!M`�'-'I� w 00...ur...um..wl Own,.�ton of aid.m I JF .''min9 Ordinance. t-�a_�• ��..L-1,�IF . — 1. .mow n car crap shred a�.w. Soil w..wr s...4 p I - 1. W op...tfm1 a!a p.W,.M.10..0.11 011°m0Lm..va. I T ''� g drill.2 _ \• _ ( 1 / I uses •Mb en arc,09 00 lionabe can crap planed In.�.IN ' W0 with w Ye 1oct07 need bard ter e / . ~, / ( 0080 a.x gM1.fir..°rL m w pmr9. F.'ea<aa lrlona. I I 1 • � � ( / w1i shouldw �.are bond m primary a fill.ara.or ataemflau 00811 a pane la w oat I / .+ / gplw.m°mr`..rrgY'r.pmpnw.' I •• e.t.a 11001 0,.r now p4a of Kw Dodder Creak' I , - 1 nigh.Pile°aetat mango of flood ela.1.d I 0. W1 bl o._, ..'titian., m allel.m. end I //� —��\ -1 '-----'44.1.,..-.. ...L.....&—...----.- I I _ .REM:DAMMDEDTR003 AND WEEMS! I.I blot 4a.am. 't.l°9ea awe..p°ml.P 1 I _ _» .__ _ _ __ any .4u to ITt St[tl 0°°°. .e.. lr 1 1 / I n.aep.mf.e to tie creation a n.nbuildings..:tor ( .— ~`"± / 1 m e.... e. n <. mill tl completion f.IOLr. .11 warm I - t\ —� \ / • I ml amnion Prune woo..• atoll a n, 1. .fir. II - ep.<f.i e-Otto.1 at 'mum Mull a a.aee.e m w 5 e \\ / / sl Green00 000w m.e,t.f.70.07..„, 1 . • rho anima animal.al. 0s. rant emit arnica w. 1 i l \ / • I 30871 .<.r.c: amaa pale:. ..uf _ industrial lint i 50 w. r .von e i in .- l \ �—/ • 00.100e`c50000.004 019000LL - s-izam. } P°� 1 ..I a lle..'�S m �"^�-..� 1 LAKE I I 4100,.' f Ya umv.WS 01 w.w w Pinar¢ ..aa�� 1 .m f ,..n) Ia.nuly ton pn,4.ra. i tey D- — aJ-�`�'� _ ' Pi.nn toe.rgr. -_ denial loe alp. I U / -.�+.'^' \I\ cat I 00t amfile -k. tar - t. eoiiEM'a'W.'osa b,.,ioi yr I iy 4/ ' w! / WILL TANK] • ebb•adults with w.w.o'.l rgtnn oat Plan. II m I / \ / �L r r vnvp°0,v. .. v. • v. 111 trod a.fna.a l m Uo.Ina.R.08.41°Cmnb I I .\ !meant..m rrw • bo 3-1/4`a a normal M. 4 amt u0011.Wv a I y I \ / I 0..000,1Peen 0 r slimed noon tome fm.swan m 4W Catty 4.e 1-0/4. • 1 t I \ / I• I.uv • bet . a '. . 0,l 1 tone ]Y glutenteat a aaM awl mend ft ' 1 \ / • .....eP t Sago l taYatlar .m t,�� \ _i/ °s1r^fie canna .Irons. t rw„elvm.. protean 0 .Idt a GDL Omana Ion el.mwe.a 'nominal disposal q lea eel! wl for w mwam bonny suns.°m4nd �j�1 I 41•1414 Canty 50110 0 ul Songs l to 005 PquLtlova .Pasture // ,a<n0 tO all . nn. ee[ ,e. W mamas aria wan WIl a natal me.cma[m / / tense .nn en two year a 0831\ram ten t awl,ttw.d le a name we pron.e.r ann.surface are I I La....-. I poet new shrub.will be Is ens u n wallas am ran fa natal Bata n„ real a mantalsn b a�if.ea.contnitation. � _ // \ / I , ram as.wwra°rapes wmlt at all Haar I ' --T / \ / i_ ' a I f j i4. all ec aa.0nm a w m emu ei le aeoenta.w tarty 1 // I \\ % + LEGAL wsesaibN]&PvnovAL mi1FlCATFO) . I w,gwi.�.0°f W 46h CvmU<dlein CM.prabnaa.l I I _ ��j 1,,. rd .0 g.[ator emll a m. IeY'rah. \ / i f°`�-q wla 108 Design BnnPua.°f Section 24.5 of w' • . / \�� owa „.n I ion`--U maim awlafpW<.. / m... gam... GjII e. Ra praprtl l t a Wll a .3.13108 [ I / / . 'p e 4UW wla w Lbean®BNa[G.of Yatlm il.e°[w 0 J 3°Moenn4.00.110011.000.• + t. 4r 1 f w m 1;reuaq 4um 0.mnt.0.e.m 4 /•-•—••„„L••••••••... "t-i-•�•••• / ...r.. Oman aput.0n .i lmfa L .au a ram 1y� • `�'� / ...n.a... -1._. o.coil j' bob the Pion.,re menv.aml alto a order W .......... —.AAA; — / t\ to ti lmu m w property Pion la I / / + I' in brawn <wplitaae.01a Pier e...o all tow 1 / • // l�\\ // fir... ..nun- f S. Ka B Pita Wll a la limited w r 1._,_ -..,C.- _ ----- .1----..o-- =-- - P Pinto .m `9w.ewem07 w fo..w� i[.m..a m u +/. ..n.a... 8.....“8.88. LI } Plana a.W°.Io1na�tTt ea�.ea.G�°r: wane canoes sj --,.qot,.N. avvtmLL f mime f es P itg . _isY.CC&ooUn rIaaa.o�.l®_a°°manna etas tn.00h plasm orof.Ca T_ I1I` o _—._ V/,III^DII,1\V� ro 000 LEQDIIC1 a. .. ' i oto 6101 101004 0'00°tac"We of 07 ompta°dames 11 I —L�DT�N'�.T'm IoW I 'll nos 04,a PROMP,' LINE 09mr• 0,..a er.n mrr.... • I. ' auu.e e.-080 0®u.u.0 I �e,�LN. a AND m' „i . • F. 4e. .Wl a rvanur ra vote:PLANT SO Mese[CtR sPE las.Is CRAMPS a ImmNnpneND Tie 2 T 015131 014 caM uP r .m...0,m.......0,.. _ . p�Upa°ag wen ell al as rammyr basl�aa etrm..ar. CP THE-CN9t• _ 4 I • pprsr 110080 with by w[mmai. kp.°t Stadar4 j t SHRUBS qi THIS YIGET TO raNZIN5 NATUP1.l LACSNTMA • , • • • L1 or eiX0r ATION m.a.mm...:1:r. 0808. ..t•.mw. j i _ ' ___Panty aanion tor mention f w halt a mn ro.'q of _ _ EFFECT.. --_ _ _ — _ e.'..',me'1°°u'f*.1-0,S' '.^.ui:zo`r •_ 6 -Pwnq 5ai.0m._ POND/LAMP. l I ' I mnWn awn.nenir,a ling ® e t e.t.a L P u[ i000..1'0.00W iroaoWILE . r 0,l.„, �e.L. r` ,,. . "— TINPPIC FLOW USEBY SPECIAL REVIEW; rt.e eme ern°.noun 0,a.0..t'la.ae4 mold NI I' bee .080808 e n taa[w 00 a. 080 PMCGLs W IN N 5Co ...salsa are. .1 .ue[lm G I.; the. W „o pulnal:r Saar.; „non,`Se le`Coney n..el D..........1.eaanae .,...,...n •r r�-(® TSG �� PERMIT PLAN MAP s , .......041. . .. I ( �in 1r co .a...,w. < r — .,. I / • r Cab sHAue] I Falb l j rl:f°:. ' re.o. WILLIAMS SITE � ' USR-886 fie .amass. Ion II TA : ,_..o.-wham../ . • N ' W00000[eaux.° vP 0 1-M _.`N/Ito mom •pb TD•d<N l,' . 01302010 010.I.e a,��1 it • REVISIONS, AGGREGATE. MINING & PROCESSING' rj 0..s.....10 TUTTLE 0,1 PPLEG�ATE„INC' • GSM I:OMP/+mES 0 RECLAMATION.PLAN '' . .leesa a. p•• 1,990 e.xm Snert.snag.1D _TOM raw Rq RA 00t.a x�Cawt�7. %� EHFET r,{,' b .0l . ' Don,,,Cplouap 89111 - re.Or.cuaum 03344 ul BP.•hd._i.. I, . • P _• r 1 ,row. _i- �. .. .. -_ - / INPIRi-bbl .__.__-._ are -. PROJECT �.._�. I? ] 89-1(— . I auszzvn 1311 prs 02322723 02/23/93 L 920 00 1/OLL OH 000 r 2237 110 MM run0N COu0 EOM Purl CO,CO x r 1 , _i___ _Ii_____ ® __,...... ........./. ....000, H:want/III 7( 0S ir.... —� •-• i .. 1 _ - m wan ! �o i/llG7/�! • I '� 1 — ._I...m`//� �`,sj�;© 111 I ogx ❑ r ---- i �I 111 b O wr 1921 II-SP-eroro•30 ouniNE RANGE 55 NEW Y • >1 ' . MI i x I sM ^^/ pp g R 8 P. 13- , • • �_ -.---------------- - �J a P O 5 ; ate , Ii $I _m mmN _ '! VICINITY MAP /�P SWE'-1'y[d' \",;,1 II I j S1E 5PECIFlC OEVELOPYEM PLAN b, o j SPECW.RENEW PERMIT ONELOPMFNT STANDARDS fl L SVe,SPdlle 2.W 0000)Non 01 04101.ryltl.20nin 93410 N le.'then .10102 smiw.00YMunWI Evnb,.I of ANN., oSo Swami In.n(eohWpw0l .0 n uamni,a M u.N No e.m 9311.n lu n o-n UNan m.00.1 ."1. Irepol PNPnuoMl.•esw.00 ma Nome. p p p @ g z µ2.b of w.pin mar e•.a....nr wa..p PEN P.*o20 I.s..w,ea" 10934 Sane I I 1 2.TM properly toed II.p.e.a F 0.00,0.Ip the ewe carer erred 0.11l 01.NA%nryY.m,b.4. Nig County ding lo ��r11� ad n �warm.nlNedPw "�rMn... N. Nw n.IIM,IN "� ,e" e_ _ e ,mow,J III D .N,`da'wPNii:.°a',0 0°""10,",00' toped e�m let complying.1N N.wwrmPNN..n s.Mn„x13 el g NrPnr.nr or f6st Pee 02 rnp.nNw for.-.wing.led No Dona. Ai hr I at Tar O".11•.00. ' o�":t "ed N. Powwows er.m0.,Pped w ANNA;Service}ma P. r�m�e�nr v,enrnar wen re new UM�b ww.rb r<,,,rh II ird b Ilene, I rcaa'�W 0.,M SPlY.4 C..n NN re CA NN b Na pm,s n n...amtnono ar0.mp.rme r .p'.p Stanton0 3-M di • 1 llll a 4,00 ee Gm p P.ry"w moor 3-IN RA.w sr7Sr7 wn-CO.IN. 9313 prwl1lw 1.93100.11.p.nrigr ul py. WAY}Ploy., al Z N40 0'2 4�Nm.Onp e1 u:Mp1mml n Fleming z40.0. pm.m uan8va.w.pwmNu.AN Shaw. 0 yl ION co b -^ mm prop Omer a operator Non a n 4p re edNp.NN al or IN fanning G•00 0 P SN.mee. p O mm I sow,'"County Gmml prtlanse.rvegyry 'OrvWpmn�for may be NORM for moeotlen n w 93001 by Ns ei O m —_—T—_ xd,SNN L p M O I I PANNING COMMISSION CFRPFlCoTON F F Q 5 I5 TO CUM IN NE nu m PLANNING NNO YY5VN NM CEPME0 WO = IJ K LCD HEREIN RECONDIOe10 00C BONO OF COUNTY CLnnAONEA.R30 COUNT!.COLOMW DO O U W 0 r e[0 007•OF TOG SITE NIIS___�pp00EyERt yry_ cn PO• .50 WO VS Or YENL RENEW0,40 IS SHOWN I00 RSONBEO NG[ON MECIFIC X511000 EMI" ti. — R' f • E WZO,,O W PROPERTY DESCRIPTION QI3g4IngItAi..L..16.Aa ~0-Q) • SITE PLAN PART OF THE NORTH HALF OF SECTION ₹ O O Q W C: SCALE: • 30,T6N.,R.65W,WELD COUNTY,COLORADO Q BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CFWIFlCATDN z a.ILO W o PROPERTY OWNERS a0x-19-OM-00. �N1OR,INC. a�D 0nos00 9,0 CERTIFY00500IN,,N[OYT 1 OF SINN CORM�CON�.MEW NM AN,E11101 SO 0 Z E)W PoaJ-19-0--N--N] PODS.1 INC.JORDANAYOO GE05.FRED GRAM 0/0 RILL xNK TRUSTEE ��C nose N.'0 OEVF1opuFN1 Slu'WipN%�C 00000 000 OECUnOFD 0000.010 Talus I¢S MYFlw F'-y li�Z, o O pl D-' O 100-Ie-0<0b0e MAAR,0210400 x 045.NUN GROWN C/0 93 ,wC. 00x3 ranee CONFER 0 a U O 802-19-0-00-001 wnmAvP.O.000 2x1.Der.Cl 4 .O�.Lty� 0003-10-0-05-010 m �1��,/LOPPING NO.000 1e G¢M'CO eOUS . 501000 s re Access 10aMM a ..,,IN�wwwl rt 0,303-xe-O-00-M1 ROWS. 000 01 000ELEY.CO 101x1 COsoul e 6W tote. 00 fl0F A To amain � NN � 8 6 a S g 0,303-xe-0-00-095 ADP" �' 0 SIRED.WINE. a 0,303-30-0-00-001 w WO. FINE war LON 11S OWES.No Pm.-wmau0, •-81• € q 010033--30-00-4000-005 MONf°EOm NC. �0"� 0 OATEN a.le,_ • A I OT t0 g I 9 01 090903-3F0�olo VORFOR1 NC.yarrow, NC.NG O OhAJ sow Loma.0.1f SLOPES.W mono. LF'S DRAWN}N .YB 9259 .-0-00-001 GNFIOT 01C PRU0ERry OWNER'S 112200013 G(5� m':•. L 0'''P x/20 0805-N-0-0D-021 5-▪ N-010-031 WNFWrt q S IRE NOEIBONG RV PAre 9'Arifvt HNEw 020 CREED/T:1'R sit, 0000 T x ``i" o1/fps/TIW 933-x5-040 W MN AM. USR-764 IW PLOT E C—o, (/ 2110031 s B RESOLUTION RE: APPROVE SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND AMENDED SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT FOR AN AGRICULTURAL SERVICE ESTABLISHMENT (EXPANSION OF OFFICE BUILDING) IN THE A (AGRICULTURAL) ZONE DISTRICT - MONFORT, INC. , C/O RONALD J. LAMBDEN WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners held a public hearing on the 10th day of February, 1993, at the hour of 10:00 a.m. in the Chambers of the Board for the purpose of hearing the application of Monfort, Inc. , c/o Ronald J. Lambden, P.O. Box G, Greeley, Colorado 80632, for a Site Specific Development Plan and Amended Special Review Permit for an agricultural service establishment (expansion of office building) in the A (Agricultural) Zone District on the following described real estate, to-wit: Part of the Ni, Section 30, Township 6 North, Range 65 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado WHEREAS, said applicant was represented by Karl Wagner, and WHEREAS, Section 24.4.2 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance provides standards for review of said Amended Special Review Permit, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners heard all of the testimony and statements of those present, has studied the request of the applicant and the recommendations of the Weld County Planning Commission and all of the exhibits and evidence presented in this matter and, having been fully informed, finds that this request shall be approved for the following reasons: 1. The submitted materials are in compliance with the application requirements of Section 24.7 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 2. It is the opinion of the Board of County Commissioners that the applicant has shown compliance with Section 24.4.2 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: a. The proposal is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan's Urban Growth Boundary Section. The City of Greeley Planning staff has reviewed this request and has no objections to the proposal. 930141 PL.Op c 3 cam.= p i. , Hi-, let") k l/t ivkt:� AMENDED SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT - MONFORT, INC. PAGE 2 b. The proposal is consistent with the intent of the Agricultural Zone District and, as an agricultural service establishment, is provided for as a Use by Special Review. c. The uses which would be permitted will be compatible with the existing surrounding land uses which include agricultural production and rural residences. d. The uses which would be permitted will be compatible with the future development of the surrounding area as permitted by the Agricultural Zone District and as permitted by the City of Greeley's Comprehensive Plan. e. The property is located in the Airport Overlay District. Special Review Permit Development Standards address this concern. f. The applicant has demonstrated a diligent effort has been made to conserve productive agricultural land in the locational decision for the proposed use. g. Special Review Permit Development Standards will provide adequate protection of the health, safety, and welfare of the neighborhood and County. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the application for a Site Specific Development Plan and Amended Special Review Permit for an agricultural service establishment (expansion of office building) in the A (Agricultural) Zone District on the hereinabove described parcel of land be, and hereby is, granted subject to the following conditions: 1. The attached Development Standards for the Amended Special Review Permit shall be adopted and placed on the Special Review plat prior to recording the plat. The plat shall be delivered to the Department of Planning Services and be ready for recording in the Weld County Clerk and Recorder's Office within 15 days of approval by the Board of County Commissioners. 2. The Special Review activity shall not occur nor shall any building or electrical permits be issued for the office building expansion until the Special Review plat is ready to be recorded in the office of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. 930141 AMENDED SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT - MONFORT, INC. PAGE 3 The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 10th day of February, A.D. , 1993. } BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: �,` � ,� WEL COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County Clerk to the Board /7,t2Ltu7GG '.c:Liz<-s,c Constance L. Harbert, Chairman BY: a -i.1g � 41 in D-✓ i't7/�?✓1i Deputy ClC1 k to the Board W. H. bster, �-Te�� APPROVED AS 0 FORM: / � •C eorge Baxte cil County Attorney Da K. Hall L--/Y1C ��1tkc/c Barbara J. Kirkmyyer 930141 HEARING CERTIFICATION DOCKET NO. 93-07 RE: SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND AMENDED SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT FOR AN AGRICULTURAL SERVICE ESTABLISHMENT (EXPANSION OF OFFICE BUILDING) IN THE A (AGRICULTURAL) ZONE DISTRICT - MONFORT, INC. , C/0 RONALD J. LAMBDEN A public hearing was conducted on February 10, 1993 at 10:00 A.M. , with the following present: Commissioner Constance L. Harbert, Chairman Commissioner W. H. Webster, Pro-Tem Commissioner George E. Baxter Commissioner Dale K. Hall Commissioner Barbara J. Kirkmeyer Also present: Acting Clerk to the Board, Shelly Miller assistant County Attorney, Bruce Barker Planning Department representative, Lanell Adler The following business was transacted: I hereby certify that pursuant to a notice dated January 13, 1993, and duly published January 21, 1993, in the Windsor Beacon, a public hearing was conducted to consider the request of Monfort, Inc. , c/o Ronald J. Lambden, for a Site Specific Development Plan and Amended Special Review Permit for an agricultural service establishment (expansion of office building) in the A (Agricultural) Zone District. Bruce Barker, Assistant County Attorney, made this a matter of record. Lanell Adler, Planning Department representative, entered the favorable recommendation of the Planning Commission into the record as written. Karl Wagner represented the applicant and stated additional space is needed to house people to provide services as needed for growth. In response to a question from Commissioner Hall, Mr. Wagner said all Development Standards are agreeable, and they will provide a handicapped access to the second floor. There was no public testimony offered concerning this matter. Commissioner Webster moved to approve the request of Monfort, Inc. , c/o Ronald J. Lambden, for a Site Specific Development Plan and Amended Special Review Permit for an agricultural service establishment (expansion of office building) in the A (Agricultural) Zone District, based on the recommendations of the Planning staff and the Planning Commission, with the Conditions of Approval and Development Standards as entered into the record. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Baxter, and it carried unanimously. This Certification was approved on the 17th day of February, 1993. APPROVED: • r i, ; ATTEST: `w , ;fit, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WEL COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County Clerk to the Board By: \�. -45- jcrir, _ Constance L. Harbert, Chairman Deputy Clerk/to the Board /Vic /` /�1 �/ W. H. Web Pro--/ em TAPE #93-05 eorge Xxter DOCKET #93-07 A Dale K. Hall PL0093 ,/-/� arbara J. Kirkmeye 930141 2c= ' rk SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT -PLAN AMENDED SPECIAL REVIEW -PERMIT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS MONFOZtT, INC. , C/O RONALD J. LAMBDEN AMENDED USR #764 1. The Site Specific Development Plan and Amended Special Review permit is for an agricultural service establishment (expansion of office building) in the A (Agricultural) Zone District as submitted in the application materials on file in the Department of Planning Services and subject to the Development Standards stated herein. 3. Approval of this plan may create a vested property right pursuant to Section 90 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 3. The property shall be operated in compliance with the Weld County Airport Overlay District requirements. 4. All construction on the property shall be in accordance with the requirements of the Weld County Building Code Ordinance. 5. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Design Standards of Section 24.5 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 6. The property owner or operator shall be responsible Tor complying with the Dperation Standards of Section 24.6 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 7. Personnel from the Weld County Health Department and Weld County Department of Planning Services shall be granted access onto the property at any reasonable time in order to ensure the activities carried out on the property comply with the Development Standards stated herein and all applicable Weld County Regulations. 8. The Special Review area shall be limited to the plans shown hereon and governed by the foregoing Standards and all applicable Weld County Regulations. Major changes from the plans or Development Standards as shown or stated shall require the approval of an amendment of the Permit by the Weld County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners before such changes from the plans or Development Standards are permitted. Any other changes shall be filed in the office of the Department of Planning Services. 9. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with all of the foregoing Development Standards. Noncompliance with any of the foregoing Development Standards may be reason for revocation of the Permit by the Board of County -Commissioners. 930141 A T T E N D A N -C E RECORD HEARINGS ARE AS FOLLOWS ON -THIS 10th DAY OF _February 1993: DOGKET II 93-06 - Special Review Permit, Conquest Oil Company DOGKET it 93-07 - Amende Special Review -Permit, Monfort, Inc. DOCKET It DOCKET It PLEASE write or print your name legibly, your address and the DOCKET II (as listed -above) or the name of the applicant of the hearing you are attending. NAME ADDRESS -HEARING ATTENDING C=.-. rt&I\,L41<' led A1L'7 i. ,hr,.&e tt t.r a 5r 6g J. IA/nowt-A: 2S.5o .5381) AVc MowFoRr - 64't P)Lnc. 1X PIA • ( f .(2 61151--fret Z12, L.I I /AUK Lc a 3 - -00 L '\)V3011 Z(D ( w(2 � Creel w 3 c /� wr , J(1)(11114)(11114 ��jj I� CNT� / i 1252 `L C✓. 13ELM our Ltyna7,./ °13 - - Q /� 2 1 I1 4u; c( c( C5 Q91 V-'cr?� L) Rersc�.�( 6r,nec:',�lrr ,ir: ,, -; I O5QC! L U� /�. (�. 90•13 �� bclstt.) / er;w? i,,.: (LS�oSal el � AL j () 1C fr qi, skkc (T7'1 4 fi`E i 230141 THE SIGN SHALL BE POSTED ADJACENT SO AND VISIBLE T'ROM PUBLICLY MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY. IN THE EVENT THE PROPERTY UNDER CONSIDERATION IS _NOT ADJACENT TO A PUBLICLY MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT- OF-WAY, THE APPLICANT SHALL POST ONE SIGN ZN THE MOST PROMINENT PLACE ON THE PROPERTY AND POST A SECOND SIGN AT THE POINT AT WHICH THE DRIVEWAY (ACCESS DRIVE) INTERSECTS A PUBLICLY MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SIGN POSTING CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER THE PENALTIES OF PERJURY -THAT THE SIGN PROVIDED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES WAS POSTED ON THE PROPERTY AT LEAST 10 DAYS BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS REARING FOR CASE #AMENDED USR-764 . THE SIGN WAS POSTED BY: NAME RSON STING SIGN STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. COUNTY OF WELD SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN -TO ME THIS 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1993 . (SEAL) N ARY PUBLIp1 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: /O-2/-Q3 LAST DAY TO POST SIGN IS: SIGNED_POSTED FROM4ANUARY 28, 7993 TO PRESENT. ;4-aN(URE OF APPLICANT STATE OF COLORADO ) // ) ss. COUNTY OF WELD SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO ME T 6TH AY OF FEBRUARY, 1993 . S1 ARY PU C MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: /0- 01-93 PLEASE RETURN THIS FORM TO THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES ' OFFICE ON OR BEFORE THE DATE OF THE HEARING. -930141 AFFIDAVIT OF FUELICATION I4OnE • The Board ofxounty STATE-OF COLORADO Commissioners of ss Weld County, COUNTY OF WELD Colorado,on Febrility 10, 1993,oondl6onau y I,]CEITH HANSEN, of said County of Weld, beingaiuly approved a mite sworn,say that Ism publisher of Specific Development Plan and amended Special Review-Permit -WINDSORSEACON for theproperty and purpose described a weekly newspaper having a gener-al circulation in said below. Conditional County and State, published in the town of WINDSOR, approval ot this plan in-said County and State; and that the notice, of which creates a vested property right pursuant the annexed is a true copy, has_been published in said to Article 66 of Title weekly for_/ successive weeks, that the notice 24, C.R.-S., as was published in the regular and-entire issue of every amended, foraperiod number of the paper during the period and_time of of three years. - publication, and in the newspaperproper and not in a APPLICANT: Monfort, supplement,and that the first publication of said notice Inc., % Ronald J. was in said paper bearing the date of the Lambden, P. 0.-Box / G, Greeley,Lob L rado gday of 92-1-11-ic44..f , A.D., 1961-3 and 80632 the last publication bearing the date of the LEGAL DESCRIPTION:Tart day of AD., 19_ and -of the N1/2 of Section that the said WINDSOR BEACON-has been published 30,Township-North, continuously and uninterruptedly for the period of 5 Range 65 West of the consecutive weeks, in said County andState, prior to the 6th P.M., Weld County,Coloradodate of firstpublication_of said notice,-and the same is a newspaper within the meaning of anAct to regulate TYPE -AND printing of legal notices an advertisements, approved INTENSITY OF May18, 1931,and all prior cts r as in force. APPROVED USE: An agricultural service establishment (expansion of office building) in the A BLISHEdt (Agricultural) Zone District Sub-,--r1�da d sworn to before me this .7--6"IZ day SIZE OF PARCEL:28 of >" tra.-i 19 9'3 acres,more or less 1) �)�7tirrtina Failure to abide by the NOTARY PUBLIC terms and conditions • _of approval will result My commission expires 9zc4r 2 in a forfeiture of the , - `- - vested property right. BOARD OFCOUNTY GOMMISS`IONERS, WELD _COUNTY, _COLORADO BY: DONALD D. WARDEN,CLERK TO THE BOARD BY: Shelly K. Miller, Deputy Clerk to the Board Published In the -Wlndsw3eacon on Februl,M,tat. NOTICE The Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, on February 10, 1993, conditionally approved a Site Specific Development Plan -and Amended Special Review Permit for the property and purpose described below. Conditional approval of this plan creates a vested property right pursuant to Article 68 of Title 24, C.R.S. , as amended, for a period of three years. APPLICANT: Monfort, Inc. Z Ronald U. Lambden P. O. Box G Greeley, Colorado 80632 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the Ni of Section 30, Township 6 North, Range 65 West Df the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado TYPE AND INTENSITY OF APPROVED USE: An agricultural service establishment (expansion of office building) in the A (Agricultural) Zone District SIZE OF PARCEL: 28 acres, more or less Failure to abide by the terms and conditions of approval will result in a forfeiture of the vested property right. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO BY: DONALD D. WARDEN CLERK TO -THE BOARD BY: 011 Deputy C 'Ark to the Board PUBLISHED: February 18, 1-993, in the Windsor Beacon 93014-1 NOTICE Pursuant to the zoning laws of the State of Colorado and the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, a public hearing will be held in the Chambers of the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, First Floor, Greeley, Colorado, at the time specified. All persons in any manner interested in the Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit are requested to attend and may be heard. Should the applicant or any interested party desire the presence of a -court reporter to make a record of the proceedings, in addition to the taped record which will be -kept during the hearing, the Clerk to the Board's Office shall be advised in writing of such action at least _five days prior to the hearing. The cost of engaging a court reporter shall he borne by the requesting party. BE 1T ALSO KNOWN that the text and maps so certified by the Weld County Planning Commission may be examined in the office of the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners, located in the Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Third Floor, Greeley, Colorado. DOCKET NO: 93-07 APPLICANT Monfort, Inc. Z Ronald J. Lambden P. 0. -Box G Greeley, Colorado 80632 DATE: February 10, 1993 TIME: 10:00 a.m. REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and Amended Special Review Permit for an agricultural service establishment (expansion of -office building) in the -A (Agricultural) Zone District LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NI of Section 30, Township fi North, -Range 65 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: South of Weld County Road 66 (AA Street) , -approximately 2,000 feet west of Highway 135 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONE-RS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO BY: DONALD D. WARDEN WELD COUNTY CLERK TO T-HE BOARD BY: Jetty Henson Deputy Clerk to the -Board DATED: January 13, 19-93 PUBLISHED: January 21, in the Windsor -Beacon 93O141 k XH113 1 k) AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF COLORADO 5s bar COUNTY OF WELD Pursuant to the-zoning I, KEITH }JANSEN, of said County of Weld, being-duly laws of the State of Colorado and the Weld' sworn,say that I am publisher of County Zoning REOUIST: A Site Ordinance, a public Specific Developieent WINDSOR BEACON heel g wilkbe held rt. Plan end Amended Chanters of Vie Br o. Special Review Permit ter County Commissioners ci enagrieuttural service a weekly newspaper having a general circulation in said Woidtounty, Colorado, estaalenmem(expansion County and State, published in the town of WINDSOR, Weldmounty Contents of office building)in the A in said County and State; and that the notice, of which Caller,915 10th Street (Agricultural)Zone District First Floor, Greeley, the-annexed is a true copy, has been published in said Colerado,,at the time LEGAL 0ESGRIPTION: Weekly for_j____successive weeks, that the notice eperdeed.All persons In -Part of the N, of$ection was published in the regular and-entire issue of every any manner mlereswd in 30, Townshlp-6 North, number of the paper a during the-period and time of the Site -Specific -Range 65 West of the 6th P P Development Plan and rP M., Weld County, publication, and in the newspaper-properand mot in a Special Review-Peemi, Colorado supplement,and that the first publication of said notice are requested to blend was inlaid paper a bearing the idate of the atrd�!beteafa LOCATION: South of P P Weld County Road 66 L Should the applicant or (AA Street), ,Z.�daym£ a-m.u.✓.+q , A.D., 19 9B and any interested *arty approximately 2,000 feet the last publication bearing the date of the belle tteesencs ci a west of Highway 85 cant reporter to mw a record of the BOARD of xouNTY day of A.D., 19_ and • proceedings, In addition -COMMISSIONERS, that the said WINDSOR-BEACON-hasbeen published le Ow taped record bah WELD COUNTY, continuously and uninterruptedly for the-period of 5 -lift be kept during-lb* ' -COLORADO baring, m -Cyra to the consecutive weeks,in said County and State, prior to the Bawd's Office flab be BY: DONALD D. date of-first publication-of-said-notice, and thesame is a Coed In writing of NO WARDEN, WELD newspaper within.'the meaning of an Act to-regulate moiler at least five ewe COUNT-Y CLERK TO prbr to the hearing:The THE BOARD printing o-f legal notices an advertisements, approved coltsf engaging a court May18, 1931,mnd all prior cts r as in force. repa by ler shell be borne BY: Letty Henson, the requesting party. Deputy Clerk to thel3oard BE IT-ALSO KNOWN MI Publls ll/ in the c ' P LIS= the Inland maps so Winner OMNI sr certified by the-Weld dhnug7l,Mt �/ Cduniy Planning Subscrib�.d and sworn to before-me this :2/7-1.._ 'lay Commission may �e of 19 1'3 examthed In the office ci the Clerk to the Board of 1� Countytommissionere, 4.4.A e On ,1/Lt-ert..md located In the Weld NOTARYBUBLIC County -Centennial Cents,915 10th Street, Third Floor, Greeley, Mytommission-expires �r 2/ / 9,74-. . Colorado. 0000 ��T DOCKET NO: 93.07 APPLICANT: Monfort, Inc, % 93onald J. Lambden, P. O. Boxs, Greeley,Colorado 80632 DATE: February 10, - 19D3 TIME:10:00 a.m. _ • • 930141 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING The under-signed hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Notice of Hearing, Docket 1193-07, was placed in the United States mail, postage prepaid, addressed to the following property owners. DATED this 00th day of January, 1993. n Deputy Clerk the Board J & M -Partners P. 0. Box 1426 Greeley, CO 80_632 Arthur and Helen Leaver % Monfort, Inc. P. 0. -Box G Greeley, CO 80631 James Gordon Gibbs % Will Kallal Trustee 1001 "0" Street Greeley, CO 80631 Monfort, Inc. % Ronald J. Lambden P. 0. Box G Greeley, CO 80632 BEFORE THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, PLANNING COMMISSION ^7_ RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Moved by Richard Kimmel that the following resolution be intrp4uced`far passage by the Weld County Planning Commission. Be it resolvet' ti'/ the Weld County Planning Commission that the application for: CASE NUMBER: Amended USR-764 NAME: Monfort, Inc. , c/o Ronald J. Lambden ADDRESS: P.O. -Box G, Greeley, Colorado 80632 REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and an Amended Special Review-permit for an Agricultur-al Service Establishment (Expansion of Office Building) in the A (Agricultural) zone district. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the N2 of Section 30, T6N, 1865W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: South of Weld County Road 66 (AA Street) , approximately 2,000 feet west of Highway 85. be recommended favor-ably to the Board of County Commissioners for the following reasons: 1. The submitted materials are in compliance with the application requirements of Section 24.7 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 2. It is the opinion of the Department of Planning Services' staff that the applicant has shown compliance with Section 24. 3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: The proposal is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan's Urban Growth Boundary Section. The City of Greeley Planning staff has reviewed this request and has no objections to the proposal. The proposal is consistent with the intent of the Agricultural zone district and, as an agricultural service establishment, is provided for as a use by special review. The uses which would be permitted will be compatible with the existing surrounding land uses which include agricultural production and rural residences. The uses which would be permitted will be compatible with the future development of the surrounding area as permitted by the Agricultural zone district and as permitted by the City of Greeley's comprehensive plan. The property is located in the Airport Overlay District. Special Review permit development standards address this concern. ,q-o S1-, (3 SUMMARY OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING �January'5, 1993: 22 A regular meeting of the Weld County Planning Commission was held on January 5, 19-93, in the County Commissioner' s Hearing Room (Room #101) , Weld County Centennial Building, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado. The meeting was called to order by the Chairperson, Judy Yamaguchi, at 1:31 p.m. Tape 429 Roll Call Richard Kimmel Present Jean Hoffman Present Tom Rulon Present Bill O'Hare Present Judy Yamaguchi Present Juliette Kroekel Absent Don Feldhaus Present Shirley Camenisch Present Bud Clemons Absent Also present: Lanell Swanson, Current Planner, Department of Planning Services, Lee Morrison, Assistant County Attorney, Sharyn Ruff, Secretary. The summary of the last regular meeting of the Weld County Planning Commission held on December 15, 1992, was approved as read. CASE NUMBER: Amended USR-764 NAME: Monfort, Inc. , c/o Ronald J. Lambden ADDRESS: P.0. Box _C, Greeley, Colorado 80632 REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and an Amended Special Review permit for an Agricultural Service Establishment (Expansion of Office Building) in the A (Agricultural) zone district. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the N2 of Section 30, T6N, 1265W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: South of Weld County Road 66 (AA Street) , approximately 2,000 feet west of Highway 85. Ronald Lambden, representative, Monfort, inc. , explained this is a proposed addition (36' x 80' square feet) to provide larger office space to an existing building. This is currently vacant land. The existing landscaping and existing parking area will be expanded. Bill O'Hare asked for additional information about the proposed parking area. Ronald -Lamb-den explained the existing parking area will expand onto already vacant land, and will meet all toning requirements. 1 \k\\* c • Shirley Camenisch asked about the time frame for this addition. Carl Wagner, Facility Manager, Monfort, Inc. , said they would like to start foundation work next month, February, 1993 and hoped to occupy the building by early May, 1993. The Chairperson asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak for or against this application. No one wished to speak. Richard Kimmel moved Case Number Amended USR-764, and Development Standards, for the expansion of an office building, be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with the Planning Commission's recommendation for approval. Motion seconded by Bill O'Hare. The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Richard Kimmel - yes; Jean Hoffman - yes; Tom Rulon - yes; Bill O'Hare - yes; Judy Yamaguchi - yes; Don Feadhaus - yes; Shirley Camenisch - yes. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 1:38 p.m. 1iespectfully submit d, Sharyn . Ruff Secretary RESOLUTION, Amended USR-764 Monfort Inc. , c/o Ronald J. Lambden Page 2 - The applicant has demonstrated a diligent effort has been made to conserve productive agricultural land in the locational decision for the proposed use. - Special Review Permit Development Standards will provide adequate protection of the health, safety, and welfare of the neighborhood and County. This recommendation is based, in part, upon a review of the application materials submitted by the applicant, other relevant information regarding the request, and responses from referral entities. The Planning Commission's recommendation for approval is conditional upon the following: 1. The attached Development Standards for the Special Review permit shall be adopted and placed on the Special Review plat prior to recording the plat. The plat shall be delivered to the Department of Planning Services and be ready for recording in the Weld County Clerk and Recorder's office within 15 days of approval by the Board of County Commissioners. 2. The Special Review activity shall not occur nor shall any building or electrical permits be issued for the office building expansion until the Special Review plat is ready to be recorded in the office of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. Motion seconded by Bill O'Hare. VOTE: For Passage Against Passage Richard Kimmel Jean Hoffman Tom Rulon Bill O'Hare Judy Yamaguchi Don Feldhaus Shirley Camenisch The Chairman declared the resolution passed and ordered that a certified copy be forwarded with the file of this case to the Board of County Commissioners for further proceedings. CERTIFICATION OF COPY I, Sharyn Ruff, Recording Secretary for the Weld County Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing resolution, is a true copy of the resolution of the Planning Commission of Weld County, Colorado, adopted on January 5, 1993. (� D d the 5th f Janua 993 4aryn F. Secretary SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Monfort, Inc. , c/o Ronald J. Lambden Amended USR-764 1. The Site Specific Development Plan and an Amended Special Review permit is for an Agricultural Service Establishment (Expansion of Office Building) in the A (Agricultural) zone district as submitted in the application materials on file in the Department of Planning Services and subject to the Development Standards stated hereon. 1. Approval of this plan may create a vested property right pursuant to Section 90 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 3. The property shall be operated in compliance with the Weld County Airport Overlay District requirements. 4. All construction on the property shall be in accordance with the requirements of the Weld County Building Code Ordinance. 5. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Design Standards of Section 24.5 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 6. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the -Operation Standards of Section 24.6 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 7. Personnel from the Weld County Health Department and Weld County Department of Planning Services shall be granted access onto the property at any reasonable time in order to ensure the activities carried out on the property comply with the Development Standards stated hereon and all applicable Weld County Regulations. 8. The Special Review area shall be limited to the plans shown hereon and governed by the foregoing Standards and all applicable Weld County Regulations. Major changes from the plans or Development Standards as shown or stated shall require the approval of an amendment of the Permit by the Weld County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners before such changes from the plans or Development Standards are permitted. Any other changes shall be filed in the office of the Department of Planning Services. 9. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with all of the foregoing Development Standards. Noncompliance with any of the foregoing Development Standards may be reason for revocation of the Permit by the Board of County Commissioners. INVENTORY _OF ITEMS SUBMITTED FOR CONSIDERATION Applicant: Monfort, Inc. Case Number: -Amended USR-764 Submitted -0r Prepared Prior to Hearing At Hearing 1. Application 6 pages X 2. 1 Application plat 1 page X 3. DPS Referral Summary Sheet X 4 4. DPS Recommendation X 5. DPS Surrounding :Property Owner's Mailing List X 6. DPS Mineral Owner's Mailing -List X 7. 3 DPS Maps Prepared by Planning Technician X 8. DPS Notice of Hearing X 9. DPS Case File Summary Sheet X 10. DPS field Check X 11. Soil Report - 17 .pages X 12. December 22, 1992, referral from Weld County Engineering X 13. _December 23, 1992, referral from Weld County Health Department X 14. December 18, 1992, referral from Greeley Planning X 15. December 18, 1992, referral from Eaton Fire Protection -District X 16. December 15, 1992, referral from West Greeley Soil Conservation District X 17. -December 11, 1992, referral from Robert J. Van Sickle X I hereby certify that the 17 items identified herein were submitted to the Department of Planning Services at or prior to the scheduled Planning Commission hearing. I further certify that these items were forwarded to the Clerk to the -Board's office on January 8, 1993. urr nt Plant STATE OF COLORADO ) COUNTY OF WELD SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS 7 day of 19 qv, OFF ., Gay SEAL . ..v G _� : t • J• • LJ��C.J y': o p N ARY PUBLIC 4 ..7' 4.• ,A�',My Cc:;111 th L::L4 i Iti:'.Cio:LI C 1, T. r � My Commiss kc3ii'Exp 930141 t)t/ibJi O EXHIBIT INVENTORY CONTROL SHEE'r Caselii-ritie,,a. LLSI ! f) Exhibit ,\ryv C} Submitted By 1y�� Exhibit Description 1 --jQ J��! A• \ r ^ �'l/ p� S} i f d J-7.1 """(.\ 11 g!f 3 B. r �.,,vi.4. � n-.�. �,,, 1 .� ,.,may, 2 1 / 8 1 13C. 1/131423D. Cam. T-0 J5eora E. F. G. H. I. J. K. L. M. N. �. P. Q. -R. S. T. U. V. W. X. Y. Z. 930141 LAND-USE APPLICATION SUMMARY SHEET Date: December 29, 1992 CASE NUMBER: Amended USR-764 NAME: Monfort, Inc. , c/o Ronald J. Lambden ADDRESS: P.O. Box G, Greeley, Colorado 80632 REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for an Agricultural Service Establishment (Expansion of Office Building) in the A (Agricultural) -zone district. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the N2 of Section 30, T6N, R65W of the -6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: South of Weld County Road 66 (AA Street) , approximately 2,000 -feet west of Highway 85. SIZE OF PARCEL: 28 acres, more or less. POSSIBLE ISSUES SUMMARIZED FROM APPLICATION MATERIALS: The criteria for review of this request is listed in Section 24.3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. The Department of -Planning Services' staff has received referral responses from the Eaton Fire Protection District, West Greeley Soil Conservation District, Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, and City of Greeley. The Department of Planning Services' staff has not received any objections from surrounding property owners. 930141 ��.R F i L - / .tl F r GREA wesrENw: ' , IIL: L • ' • 34 vs •I♦ . I I P t. • mea OnwETTI. •e 1 syar ! tc • • n • • ZJ _ 'I 22 I I �1 uGEReE ti • • 'I • •�-_ s.ul ,5• Late .I, 1. t�, l III .Iffi '_ ' sL'�z / • t• PAN cv new Lake I ' it �t 1 I j�J�/ Ie Ihic � O ill I :'a R.mr�,°- ®!,• ALL' . - -- a Mt (�t ��:z x • '�..' 'e '': LIB ilial or "irev I.i I,E\,-, • .�nil 1 �yy4±.,\'��\iq�4{�"1 al, {J��Ij • ,. `c�OO'L_ra AIZEILMIL• j I I?>3!s' .' y / �;,FCh?''. •i+'. � xPOP Ino fasfr _,_,, _ „..__,..._la. 12:Gm s; '$ s ; v �i I:i�gnl s \ aver � J ' I ; 1i \ s • orrect Ion erop L ne ®� ^/ Nort ��;� I $ Ai �� 1 ... a db°�°;LE , von. o f N•I�� ['Doti sP IFiO T..�1A. �' ; _ _ _ Vr ng ; _ _ �T il I _, _ :•.,� 4 ::, , .. 21 CI, .. :S_ _ ::: 1:I r�r2b. : [ . [ • n• . 4( van � . T• ' atriariall - - -- si en.,,,. _ i.; a Q "j s l ; 2 n :. I. .,}° ..ewn.n��.,. ..,iiirionfiwil .. a � •__ _ _ _. .fo1 5 ar '.roiur•,;• • • : ry,°t I '�' „ I ' — __..a. yr• •• '3c i� . ]�( p\1 y" .o it 1 S � p JP4r M 1 WINO O v. •'.A e cerne V e. ,a Pt _ _ _0 o Er n I —` 706 ••,- Olin School I 738 Lp o A1 • 11 v I Buell Sch iP == _• ° � � �J 20 7, ,_,,D a / rl fop y a .J r32 0 '�� sp IJ / __ __ ��4ns en ,I' a�2 0 1 >09 Io (C , Ju II I' '0 47/6•• V ";72c;/ 1. r'r �li II I J r.ri 14\\ I - % � of , - / 4 a r3 ' I o _ , a>09 4yz° o O 1 //�\ \V 1 u G eley Junction d ° N. _ a6se '.."1— \--\- 700 mpero c7-7 ---- \7- - \ Ln`il �� _ cuter,' II i1 4 r I 4 ' . x� � 4683ll 1.961° ° l r, V -,Sp^ng �1 .a n]°� _ • P{� ��o C ^ P \ III `e6\ 2,frJ()�. t-, y(1 36,2 4,;;[.,, ` ° _ X64� � V V, l 1 Lis dn�. 1 .N4644 ,// I, . I 3.C ��`SryO �� - ! '� �'� I __.-7:-:,..._, / I O 11 I, 46 V �if ..� • 1-46-61Ir Lo, r : JI_, '� 4646 II l_ „III II 8� r1 1C 9655 I� P� 4642 I il 'Id • / R�< _. 7 - • ! I.. e• � T:7rIZ si. In ." 1: • • .Iy. 5{� �C " Y • tF N. • ♦ t 4 '1 ' • F .3L t • • • 44b 4 t ₹F' .va 4e< 1,t y I. �� - • ` ... _ .. p rt;fro. Y`. i L ;XI: f fi `' tfi� 'Y .s 0, �.• -1 . [ .'". F : L F ii Si/ t M f2' ' N w' s h N !,:,.44.4', j .�. ry '. •;44.4._ C ',r• • • 1^.'j j .- • µ` "; fit ti.-_ 1 .: �s x s ' ' -- r • tr h+ Y • fi • r r ��rM ..14:,...: '4 S j rF e • t •r- a o f .{'I' y .ifs .•4 ';'4.‘i `", ~ *' 3 - L s • ....M ,1Z lit 1 VS • • ` i 04. t is » P.. k'F ,, �/ tFii. • nF tw :;ice o- ...y '+'- 7, e' 4 . ARP t..a. . , a • s, sryy,. ,N. g i 'J 4, } i s ,A , k.i - 'A'1 .t X .a f � ♦ tl ,... St •• 4e44 a F }} s a . ♦ry • Q 4.,:A ..*,11..,, IM ♦ a' + + >,x}t. 7"I: f�: r SsYII•gt : t w ya a at. } k,c '1.'1; 3 42;‘,172.4 tY aiM k„ F t • a I (r^.x)�1 t s = f t ¢ .e., , 'tt 's • ti's,., . FIELD CHECK FILING NUMBER: Amended USR-7-64 DATE OF INSPECTION: December 18, 1992 APPLICANT'S NAME: Monfort, Inc. , c/o Ronald J. Lambden REQUEST: A Site Specific _Development Plan and a Special Review permit for an Agricultural Service Establishment (Expansion of an Office Building) . LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the N2 of Section 30, T6N, R65W -of the 6th Y.M. , Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: South of Weld County Road 66 (AA Street) , approximately 2,000 1Qet west of Highway 85. LAND USE: N AA Street, agricultural production, sssidences. E Agricultural production, Highway 85. S Agricultural production. W Agricultural production. ZONING: N A (Agricultural) E A (Agricultural) S A (Agricultural) W A (Agricultural) COMMENTS: Access is as shown from Weld County Road 66 (AA Street) a paved County local. Structures appear as shown. The southern portion of the property slopes toward the south. Landscaping is in place. r ent P n r 9o14 1 REFERRAL LIST NAME: Monfort, Inc. , c/o Ronald J. Lambden CASE NUMBER: Amended USR-764 REFERRALS SENT: December 4, 1992 REFERRALS TO BE RECEIVED BY: December 18, 1992 COUNTY TOWNS and CITIES Attorney _Ault X Health Department _Brighton _Extension Service Broomfield _Emergency Management Office Dacono Sheriff's Office _Eaton X Engineering Erie _Housing Authority _Evans Airport Authority Firestone X Building Inspection _Fort Lupton _Frederick STATE _Garden City Division of Water Resources Gilcrest _Geological Survey X Greeley _Department of Health Grover _Highway Department _Hudson _Historical Society Johnstown Water Conservation Board _Keenesburg ./ -R--Oil and Gas Conservation Commission Kersey La Salle FIRE DISTRICTS _Lochbuie _Ault F-1 _Longmont _Berthoud F-2 Mead Briggsdale F-24 Milliken _Brighton F-3 New Raymer X Eaton F-4 Northglenn Fort Lupton F-5 Nunn Galeton F-b Platteville Hudson F-7 Severance _Johnstown F-B Thornton La Salle F--9 Windsor _Mountain View F-10 _Milliken F-11 COUNTIES _Nunn F-12 Adams _Pawnee F-22 _Boulder _Platteville F-13 Larimer Platte Valley F-14 Poudre Valley F-15 FEDERAL _GOVERNMENT AGENCIES Raymer F-2 _US Army Corps of Engineers Southeast Weld F-16 _USDA-APHIS Veterinary Service _Windsor/Severance F-17 Federal Aviation Administration Wiggins F-18 Federal Communication Commission _Western Hills F-20 SOIL CONSERVATION DISTRICTS OTHER Brighton Central Colo. Water Conservancy Dist. Fort Collins Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. 1 X Greeley Tri-Area Planning Commission Longmont _West Adams COMMISSION/BOARD MEMBER X Tom Rulon 930141 Kit DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES p -- - PHONE (303)353-3945, EXT. 3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 140 N O ORAAVENUEO631 GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 WI I D COLORADO QF„C - e 1992 December 4, 1992 NUMBER: Amended USR-764 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: ^l\s\ �\\ .�i, , Enclosed is an application from Monfort, Inc. , c/o Ronald J. Lambden for a Site Specific Development Plan and an Amended Special Review permit for an Agricultural Service Establishment (Expansion of Office Building) in the A (Agricultural) zone district. The parcel of land is described as part of the N2 of Section 30, T6N, R65W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is south of Weld County Road 66 (AA Street) , approximately 2,000 feet west of Highway 85. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt _consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by December 18, 1992, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Lanell J. Swanson, Current Planner if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address list-ed above. 1. We_have reviewed this request and find that it clots does woes not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. Tart Is no s:JK:c;ca„f ;mtke+ from its d nnaro-ee( Mse sa ax.s4:y ucecI y/1 4:a +bo Cry's1 1.41 rsxic N €4.teaed �t nu- . araa . Duck' odd: 44:s £4na.T be ne v,.w.cl by A& ?Taeelwwyy C.e .Jst}.r ("4:I T.atgty /793 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following seasons: 3. We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Please r-efer to the enclosed letter. Signed: /�s//,'i /� 1ja• a Agency: G1, Date: 4/ DEC 231992 9301.41 'glair!Pao...f,r ifligi nr. rat Le.... : WI liDEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303)353-3845, EXT. 3540 C• WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 1400 N. 17TH AVENUE GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 COLORADO December 4, 1992 CASE NUMBER: Amended USR-764 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from Monfort, Inc. , c/o Ronald J. Lambden for a Site Specific Development Plan and an Amended Special Review permit for an Agricultural Service Establishment (Expansion of Office Building) in the A (Agricultural) zone district. The parcel of land is described as part of the N2 of Section 30, T6N, R65W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is south of Weld County Road 66 (AA Street) , approximately 2,000 feet west of Highway 85. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by December 18, 1992, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Lanell J . Swanson, Current Planner if you have any _questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: 3. C------- We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Please ref er to the enclosed letter. / �f/J Signed: ir/ e�jJ Wu U�l 4-744 j, Agency: eti ?/LLP Pri,ot Date: / 1 - /y . 1Tu ' " -Jf211r \V r 1 itDEC 2 1 1992 1 9301.4j 'vala Pnort,insIttninn *ii . 1400 N. 17TH O�C p`#414 (fry W��yti t GREELEY, COLORADO 8063E acA D� �" COLORADO �'°� �' �`�� In47 December 4, 1992 A E NUM� Amended USR-764 ��LZ9Zg° TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from Monfort, Inc. , c/o Ronald J. Lambden for a Site Specific Development Plan and an Amended Special Review permit for an Agricultural Service Establishment (Expansion of Office Building) in the A (Agricultural) zone district. The parcel of land is described as part of the N2 of Section 30, T6N, R65W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is south of Weld County Road 66 (AA Street) , approximately 2,000 feet west of Highway 85 . This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your-prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by December 18, 1992 , so that we may give full. consideration to your recommendation. Please call Lanell J. Swanson, Current Planner if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: 3. // We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests . 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Please refer to the enclosed letter. { 7� Signed:--LJ/,J 4,q �.Gt�'Ys'!/air� Agency: l/J C.$/2.e* J ` .2) Date: /2//S7/ 2 930141 p f ' DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES WAD IRECEIVED PHONE (303)353- 45, EXT.3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 1400 N. 17TH AVENUE C. � � (� ";�� GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 COLORADO coLo.on.&GAS CONS.COMM. December 4, 1992 CASE NUMBER: Amended USR-764 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from Monfort, Inc. , c/o Ronald J. Lambden for a Site Specific Development Plan and an Amended Special Review permit for an Agricultural Service Establishment (Expansion of Office Building) in the A (Agricultural) zone district. The parcel of land is described as part of the N2 of Section 30, T6N, R65W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is south of Weld County Road 66 (AA Street) , approximately 2,000 feet west of Highway 85 . This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by December 18, 1992, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Lanell J. Swanson, Current Planner if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons : 3. XXX We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5 . Please refer to the enclosed letter. Signed:./a�, � Agency: Colorado Oil & Gas Conservation Commission Date: December , 1992 Sr' DEC 14I9n1 930141 _ t Weld County Plar::,ing DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303)353-3845, EXT. 3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 140C. UE GREELEY, N. ORA O8 631 COLORADO 80631 COLORADO NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Weld County Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, January 5, 1993, at 1:30 p.m. for the purpose of considering a Site Specific Development Plan and an Amended Special Review permit for the property described below. Approval of the request may create a vested property right pursuant to Colorado Law. APPLICANT: Monfort, Inc. , c/o Ronald J. Lambden LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the N2 of Section 30, T6N, R65W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. TYPE AND INTENSITY OF PROPOSED USE: Agricultural Service Establishment (Expansion of Office Building) in the A (Agricultural) zone district. LOCATION: South of Weld County Road 66 (AA Street) , approximately 2,000 feet west of Highway 85. SIZE: 28 acres, more or less. The public hearing will be held in the Weld County Commissioners' Hearing Room, First Floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado. Comments or objections related to the above request should be submitted in writing to the Weld County Department of Planning Services, 915 Tenth Street, Room 342, Greeley, Colorado 80631, before the above date or presented at the public hearing on January 5, 1993. Copies of the application are available for public inspection in the Department of Planning Services, 1400 N. 17th Avenue, Greeley, Colorado 80631 - Phone - 353-3845, Extension 3540. Judy Yamaguchi, Chairperson Weld County Planning Commission To be published in the Windsor Beacon To be published one (1) me by December 10, 1992. Received by: " Date: / i! 930141 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING I hereby certify that I have placed a true and correct copy of the surrounding property owners and owners and lessees of minerals in accordance with the notification requirements of Weld County in Case Number Amended USR-764 for Monfort, Inc. , c/o Ronald J. Lambden in the United States Mail, postage prepaid First Class Mail by letter as addressed on the attached list. this 8th day of December, 1992. \VARY.6 230141 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE(303)353-3845, EXT. 3540 1111 9 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES C. 1400 N 17RA AVENUE GREEL EY, COLORADO 80631 COLORADO DATE: Tecember 4, 1992 TO: SURROUNDING PROPERTY/MINERAL OWNERS CASE NUMBER: Amended USR-764 There will be a Public Hearing before the Weld County Planning Commission on Tuesday, January 5, 1993, at 1:30 p.m. , in the County Commissioners' Hearing Room, First Floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado concerning the request of: NAME: Monfort, Inc. , c/o Ronald J. Lambden FOR: A Site Specific Development Plan and an Amended Special Review permit for an Agricultural Service Establishment (Expansion of Office Building) in the A (Agricultural) zone district. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the N2 of Section 30, T6N, R65W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: South of Weld County Road 66 (AA Street) , approximately 2,000 feet west of Highway 85. Your property is within five-hundred (500) feet of the property on which this request has been made. For additional information write or telephone Lanell J. Swanson, Current -Planner. 920141 SURROUNDING PROPERTY -OWNERS AND/OR INTEREST/SUBSURFACE -ESTATE OWNERS Monfort, Inc. , c/o Ronald U. Lambden Amended IJSR-764 J & M _Partners P.D. Box 1426 Greeley, CO -80632 Arthur and Helen Leaver e/o Monfort, Inc. P.O. Box 1; Greeley, _CO 80631 James Gordon Gibbs c/o Will Kallal Trustee 1001 "0" Street Greeley, CO 80631 Monfort, Inc. P.O. lox G Greeley, CO 8-0632 930141 NAMES -OF OWNERS OF _PROPERTY WITHIN 500 FEET Please print or type NAME ADDRESS, TOWN/CITY, ASSESSOR' S -P-ARCEL STATE AND ZIP CODE IDENTIFICATION # J & M Partners P.O. Box 1426, Greeley, Colorado 80632 0803-19-009 Arthur Leaver & Helen Leaver c/o Monfort, Inc. , P.O. -Box G, Greeley, Co. 80632 0803-19-008 James Gordon Gibbs c/o Will Kallal Trustee, 1001 "0" Street, Greeley, _Co. 80631 0803-19-907 Monfort, Inc. P.O. Box G, Greeley, Colorado 80632 0803-19-006 0803-30-001 0803-30-904 0805-25-021 93014i AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS MINERALS AND/OR SUBSURFACE ESTATE Application No. Pt of W2 NE4 NW4 30-6-65 Subject Property STATE OF COLORADO ) ss COUNTY OF WELD THE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn, states that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names and addresses of all mineral owners and lessees of mineral owners on -0r under the parcel of land under as their names appear upon the records in the Weld County Clerk and Recorder's Office or from an ownership update from a title or abstract company or an attorney. R nald J. Lambde Attorney regis ation No. 5266 The foregoing instrument was subscribed and/worn to before me this irmay of d , 1992. WITNESS my hand and official seal. My Commission Expires: /0-21-13 �otary Pub ic 930141 AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS SURFACE ESTATE Application No. Subject Property Pt of W 2 NW4 NE4 30-6-65 STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. COUNTY OF WELD ) THE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn, states that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names, addresses, and the corresponding Parcel Identification Number assigned by the Weld County Assessor of the owners' of property (the surface estate) within five hundred feet of the property under consideration This list was compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor, or an ownership update from a title or abstract company or attorney, derived from such records, or from the records of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. The list compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor shall have been assembled within thirty days of the application's submission date. l Ronald J. ambden, Atto ey registration No. 5266 The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me this IC471 r-- day C11014-P4VM1 , 199 �UH1-6, by O LJ. 4,91716.06,43 WITNESS my hand and official seal. MY Commission expires/1 2/-93 Not ry Public My Commission Expires: /0a/43_ 9yi41 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303) 353-3845, EXT. 3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 140�i ON. ORAAVENUEO631 GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 COLORADO December 3, 1992 Monfort, Inc. , c/o Ronald J . Lambden P.O. Box G Greeley, CO 80632 Subject: Amended USR-764 - Request for a Site Specific Development Plan and an Amended Special Review permit for an Agricultural Service Establishment (Expansion of Office Building) in the A (Agricultural) zone district on a parcel of land described as part of the N2 of Section 30, T6N, R65W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. Dear Mr. Lambden: Your application and related materials for the request described above are complete and in order at the present time. I have scheduled a meeting with the Weld County Planning Commission for Tuesday, January 5, 1993, at 1:30 p.m. This meeting will take place in the County Commissioners' Hearing Room, first floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado. It is recommended that you and/or a representative be in attendance to answer any questions the Planning Commission members might have with respect to your application. It is the policy of Weld County to refer an application of this nature to any town or municipality lying within three miles of the property in question or if the property under consideration is located within the comprehensive planning area of a town or municipality. Therefore, our office has forwarded a copy of the submitted materials to the City of Greeley Planning Commission for its review and comments. Please call Hank Epstein at 350-9783 for further details regarding the date, time, and place of this meeting. It is recommended that you and/or a representative be in attendance at the Greeley Planning Commission Meeting to answer any questions the Commission members -nay have with respect to your application. It is the responsibility of an applicant to see that a sign is posted on the property under consideration at least 10 days preceding the hearing date . Sometime prior to December 22, 1992 , you or a representative should call me to obtain a sign to be posted on the site no later than December 26 , 1992. The sign shall be posted adjacent to and visible from a publicly maintained road right-of-way. In the event the property under consideration is not adjacent to a publicly maintained road right- of-way, the applicant shall post one sign in the most prominent place on the property and post a second sign at the point at which the driveway (access drive) intersects a publicly maintained road right--of-way. Your sign posting certificate must be returned to the Department of Planning Services' office on or before the date of the hearing. 930141 Monfort, Inc. , c/o Ronald J. Lambden Amended USR-764 Page 2 The Department of Planning Services' staff will make a recommendation concerning this application to the Weld County Planning Commission. This recommendation will be available twenty-four (24) hours before the scheduled hearing. It is the responsibility of the applicant to call the Department of Planning Services' office before the Planning Commission hearing to make arrangements to obtain the recommendation. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to call me. /Reesspppee"'ctfully, Lanell 3. r_ :anson Current Planner LJS/sfr 930141 Date: January 6 , 1992 CASE NUMBER: Amended USR-764 NAME: Monfort, Inc. , c/o Ronald J. Lambden ADDRESS: P.O. Box G, Greeley, Colorado 80632 REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and an Amended Special Review permit for an Agricultural Service Establishment (Expansion of Office Building) in the A (Agricultural) zone district. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the N2 of Section 30, T6N, R65W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: South of Weld County Road 66 (AA Street) , approximately 2,000 feet west of Highway 85. THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES' STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THIS REQUEST BE APPROVED FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: 1. The submitted materials are in compliance with the application requirements of Section 24.7 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 2. It is the opinion of the Department of Planning Services' staff that the applicant has shown compliance with Section 24.3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: The proposal is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan' s Urban Growth Boundary Section. The City of -Greeley Planning staff has reviewed this request and has no objections to the proposal. The proposal is consistent with the intent of the Agricultural zone district and, as an agricultural service establishment, is provided for as a use by special review. The uses which would be permitted will be compatible with the existing surrounding land uses which include agricultural production and rural residences. The uses which would be permitted will be compatible with the future development of -the surrounding area as permitted by the Agricultural zone district and as permitted by the City of Greeley's comprehensive plan. The property is located in the Airport Overlay District. Special Review permit development standards address this concern. The applicant has demonstrated a diligent effort has been made to conserve productive agricultural land in the locational decision for the proposed use. 9. 0.141 RECOMMENDATION, Amended USR-764 Monfort Inc. , c/o Ronald J . Lambden Page 2 Special Review Permit Development Standards will provide adequate protection of the health, safety, and welfare of the neighborhood and County. This recommendation is based, in part, upon a review of the application materials submitted by the applicant, other relevant information regarding the request, and responses from referral entities. The Department of Planning Services' staff recommendation for approval is conditional upon the following: 1. The attached Development Standards for the Special Review permit shall be adopted and placed on the Special Review plat prior to recording the plat. The plat shall be delivered to the Department of Planning Services and be ready for recording in the Weld County Clerk and Recorder's office within 15 days of approval by the Board of County Commissioners. 2. The Special Review activity shall not occur nor shall any building or electrical permits be issued for the office building expansion until the Special Review plat is ready to be recorded in the office of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. 93:0141 SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Monfort, Inc. , c/o Ronald J. Lambden Amended USR-764 1. The Site Specific Development Plan and an Amended Special Review permit is for an Agricultural Service Establishment (Expansion of Office Building) in the A (Agricultural) zone district as submitted in the application materials on file in the Department of Planning Services and subject to the Development Standards stated hereon. 2. Approval of this plan may create a vested property right pursuant to Section 90 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 3. The property shall be operated in compliance with the Weld County Airport Overlay District requirements. 4. All construction on the property shall be in accordance with the requirements of the Weld County Building Code Ordinance. 5. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Design Standards of Section 24.5 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 6. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Operation Standards of Section 24.6 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 7. Personnel from the Weld County Health Department and Weld County Department of _Planning Services shall be granted access onto the property at any reasonable time in order to ensure the activities carried out on the property comply with the Development Standards stated hereon and all applicable Weld County Regulations. 8. The Special Review area shall be limited to the plans shown hereon and governed by the foregoing Standards and all applicable Weld County Regulations. Major changes from the plans or Development Standards as shown or stated shall require the approval of an amendment of the Permit by the Weld County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners before such changes from the plans or Development Standards are permitted. Any other changes shall be filed in the office of the Department of Planning Services. 9. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with all of the foregoing Development Standards. Noncompliance with any of the foregoing Development Standards may be reason for revocation of the Permit by the Board of County Commissioners. 930.141 Att. DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE(303)353-3845, EXT.3540 ' WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 1400 N.17TH AVENUE O GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 RECEIVEr COLORADO DEC 0 72? December 4, 1992 CASE NUMBER: Amended USR-764 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from Monfort, Inc. , c/o Ronald J. Lambden for a Site Specific Development Plan and an Amended Special Review permit for an Agricultural Service Establishment (Expansion of Office Building) in the A (Agricultural) zone district. The parcel of land is described as part of the N2 of Section 30, T6N, R65W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is south of Weld County Road 66 (AA Street) , approximately 2,000 feet west of Highway 85. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by December 18, 1992, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Lanell J . Swanson, Current Planner if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2. We do not -have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: 3. We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Plea e fer to the enclosed letter. Signed: �e\\? �� „Q;;:, Agency: ,Cvt C'l un e 2 `r o„ rk Date: 12 - 22- ct ist�� DEC 2 8 1992 , 930t41 'g,,per-.,...nhonlnm t ‘t, DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES ' PHONE(303)353.3645, EXT.3540 WI WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES C. 1400 N.17TH AVENUE . . GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 COLORADO - December 4, 1992 CASE NUMBER: Amended USR-764 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from Monfort, Inc. , c/o Ronald J. Lambden for a Site Specific Development Plan and an Amended Special Review permit for an Agricultural Service Establishment (Expansion of Office Building) in the A (Agricultural) zone district. The parcel of land is described as part of the N2 of Section 30, T6N, R65W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is south of Weld County Road 66 (AA Street) , approximately 2,000 feet west of Highway 85. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by December 18, 1992, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Lanell J . Swanson, Current Planner if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons : 3. We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Please ref er ) to the enclosed letter. f ,G_ f/_ i ' ✓ IC . v �1 V v Signed: i Agency: UI Date: ( 3/f.Z DEC 2 9 1992 l� .Mal A A...fImin nintI ille 930141 ►0Monfort Monfort, Inc Corporate Offices P.O. Box G -Greeley, Colorado 80632 (303) 353-2311 November 10, 1992 Weld County Department of Planning Services Weld County Administrative Offices 1400 North 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 Re: Use by Special Review for Monfort, Inc. Corporate headquarters Gentlemen: Monfort, Inc. intends to expand its south office building at its corporate headquarters area north of Greeley. The south office building will be expanded by 36' x 84 ' addition to the south end of the current building. The addition will provide office space for approximately twenty-five employees of which two-thirds are already occupants of the south building. The office building to which the addition will be made is one of three office buildings at the site. The other surrounding uses include Monfort Transportation truck terminal and agricultural uses. The nearest residential use is approximately one-quarter mile away and is owned by the Applicant. Water is provided by North Weld and sewage is provided by the sewage services provided by the City of Greeley. The current parking facility located to the east of the current building is adequate for any additional employee parking. If there is need for further parking, the east parking lot can be expanded in a southerly direction. Access to the parking shall remain as shown on the plat. No further access is anticipated for this addition. The Monfort corporate headquarters facilities are protected by a private warning service and the Eaton Fire Department. Storm water is captured on premise and used for irrigation. The Applicant intends to expand the current landscaping which includes grass and ornamental shrubs. The addition to the current building should be completed between four to six months from the start date, in accordance with weather limitations. 920141 Page Two November 10, 1992 Monfort has had a role in Weld County agri-business since the 1930 ' s. The expansion project described herein will facilitate Monfort's further contribution to Weld County agricultural business in accordance with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. Although the proposed addition is in an agricultural zone, the actual ground to be used is not currently in agricultural use, but rather was previously used for storage by the Monfort Fab Shop. The proposed addition is not close to residential uses, will not generate noise or other pollutants, will allow expanded employment at the - corporate office and krill not impact the Weld County or City of Greeley Comprehensive Plans in any adverse way. The proposed use is not in the flood plain, nor a geographic hazard area, nor will it impact the Weld County Airport Overlay District. If there is further information I can provide to you concerning this matter, please feel free to contact me or Walt Bedinger at Monfort Engineering or Karl Wagner at Monfort Corporate Headquarters. Very t ly ,cur o d J. den Associa eneral Counsel /eq 930141 AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS SURFACE ESTATE Application No. Subject Property Pt of W 2 NW4 NE4 30-6-65 STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. COUNTY OF WELD ) THE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn, states that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names, addresses, and the corresponding Parcel Identification Number assigned by the Weld County Assessor of the owners' of property (the surface estate) within five hundred feet of the property under consideration This list was compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor, or an ownership update from a title or abstract company or attorney, derived from such records, or from the records of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. The list compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor shall have been assembled within thirty days of the application's submission date. Ronald J. mbden, Atto ey registration No. 5266 The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me this /Y day L'6v4 n4et , 1941, by e0k).41-O J h siC WITNESS my hand and official seal. MY Commission expiresli) 21-43 Not ry Public My Commission Expires: /0a143- _ 920141 NAMES OF OWNERS OF PROPERTY WITHIN 300 FEET Please print or type NAME ADDRESS, TOWN/CITY, ASSESSOR'S PARCEL STATE AND ZIP CODE IDENTIFICATION // J & M Partners P.O. Box 1426, Greeley, Colorado 80632 0803-19-009 Arthur Leaver & Helen Leaver c/o Monfort, Inc. , P.O. Box G, Greeley, Co. 80632 0803-19-008 James Gordon Gibbs c/o Will Kallal Trustee, 1001 "0" Street, Greeley, Co. 80631 0803-19-007 Monfort, Inc. P.O. Box G, Greeley, Colorado 80632 0803-19-006 0803-30-001 0803-30-004 0805-25-021 S30141 AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS MINERALS AND/OR SUBSURFACE ESTATE Application No. Subject Property Pt of W2 NE4 NW4 30-6-65 STATE OF COLORADO ) ss COUNTY OF WELD ) THE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn, states that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of-the-names and addresses of all mineral owners and lessees of mineral owners on or under the parcel of land under as their names appear upon the records in the Weld County Clerk and Recorder's Office or from an ownership update from a title or abstract company or an attorney. R Wald J. Lambd Attorney reg s ation No. 5266 The foregoing instrument was subscribed and/sworn to before me this /6 day of -44_, , l98,. WITNESS my hand and official seal. My Commission Expires: JQ.2/4a otary Pub ic 9201.41 USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW APPLICATION Department of Planning Services, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado 80631 Phone - 356-4000 - Ext. 4400 Case Number Date Received Application Checked by Mylar plat submitted Application Fee Receipt Number Recording Fee Receipt Number TO BE COMPLETED hy APPLICANT: (please print or type, except for necessary signature) Monfort, Inc. I (we) , the undersigned, hereby request a hearing before the Weld County Planning Commission concerning the proposed Major Facilities of a Public Utility Special Review Permit on the following described unincorporated area of Weld County, Colorado: LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT AREA: W2, NE4, NW4 Section 30 T 6 N, R 65 w LEGAL DESCRIPTION of contiguous property owned upon which Special Review Permit is proposed: All Section 30 T 6 N, R 65 W Property Address (if available) 1900 AA Street, Greeley, Colorado PRESENT ZONE A-Agriculture OVERLAY ZONES TOTAL ACREAGE?S¢0 Acres I PROPOSED LAND USE Commercial (Office) EXISTING LAND USE Commercial (Office) and agricultural SURFACE fEE (PROPERTY OWNERS) OF AREA PROPOSED 1 IBE USE Ay SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT: Monfort, Inc. , successor in interest to Name: Address: '3_0, Box G City Greeley. Co Zip 80632 Home Telephone # 303-353-2311 Business Telephone # 303-353-2311 Name: • Address: City Zip Home Telephone It Business Telephone Q APPLICANT OR AUTHORIZED AGENT jjf different than above) : Name: Ronald J. Lambden, Associate General Counsel Address: City Zip Home Telephone It Business Telephone It List the owner(s) and/or lessees of mineral rights on or under the subject properties of record. Name: Monfort, Inc. Address: P.O. Box G City Greeley, Co Zip aubi2 Name: Address: City Zip I hereby depose and state under the penalties of perjury that all statements, proposals and/or plans submitted with or contained within th pplication are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. COUNTY OF WELD ) STATE OF COLORADO ) Signs er or ythorized Agent Subscribed and sworn to befo me this / day of �OU.?irc,Gte1 199x. NO ARY PURL C My commission expires le-at-f3 930141 CO P . 3oOT H Chen &Associates . .- Consulting Geotechnical Engineers 9301.41 96 South Zuni Casper Chen&Associates Denver. Colorado 80223 Colorado Springs Consulting Geotechnical Engineers 303/744-7105 Ft. Collins 1;4Glenwood Springs Phoenix Rock Springs Salt Lake City San Antonio SOIL AND FOUNDATION STUDY PROPOSED OFFICE BUILDING, ADDITION TO CORPORATE OFFICE COMPLEX, MONFORT OF COLORADO, INC. GREELEY, COLORADO PREPARED FOR: MONFORT OF COLORADO P.O. BOX G GREELEY, COLORADO 80632 ATTENTION: MR. RALPH ARNOLD JOB NO. 1 856 87 NOVEMBER 12, 1987 930141 -TABLE OF CONTENTS CONCLUSIONS 1 -PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY 2 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION 2 SITE CONDITIONS 3 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 3 FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS 4 FLOOR SLABS 6 -FOUNDATION WALLS 7 WATER SOLUBLE SULFATES 8 SURFACE DRAINAGE 9 LIMITATIONS 9 FIGURE 1 - LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 2 - LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS LEGEND AND NOTES FIGURE 3 - CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS FIGURE 4 - SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS TABLE I - SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS 93O141 Chen&Associates CONCLUSIONS (1 ) The subsoils encountered in the borings consist _of silty to clayey sand interlayered with sandy to very sandy clay at depth. The upper silty sands exhibit a potential to compress when wetted while under constant load. (2) We recommend the proposed building be founded with spread footings placed on the undisturbed -natural soils designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 1 ,500 psf. The allowable soil bearing pressure may be increased to 3,000 psf if the foundation soils are overexcavated and replaced properly compacted. Required depths of overexcavation and replacement are discussed in the report text. The relatively low bearing pressure for the undisturbed natural soils is recommended because of the moisture sensitivity of the -soils in their undisturbed state. 930141 Chen&Associates -2- PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY This report presents the results of a soil and foundation study for the proposed office building to be located -at the Monfort of Colorado Office Complex. The site is located in -the NE 1/4, NW 1/4, Sec. 30, T. 6 N. , R. 65 W. , Weld County, Colorado. The study was -conducted for the purpose of developing foundation recannendations for the proposed building. The project site is shown on Fig. 1 . A field -exploration program consisting of four exploratory borings was conducted to obtain information on subsurface conditions. Material samples obtained during the field exploration were tested in the l-aboratory to determine the compressibility or swell characteristics and classification of the on site soil. The results of the field exploration and laboratory testing were analysed to develop recanmendations for foundation types, depths and allowable pressures for the -proposed building foundation. The results of the field exploration and laboratory testing are presented herein. This report has been prepared to surtmarize the data obtained during this study and to present our _conclusions and recarmendations based on the -proposed construction and the subsurface conditions encountered. Design parameters and a discussion of geotechnical engineering considerations related to construction of the proposed building are included in the report. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION We understand the proposed building will be a one to two-story wood frame structure occupying a footprint area of approximately 10,000 square feet. Column loads will range up to nearly 100 kips. We understand she site will be 920144 Chen&Associates -3- regraded so the loser level of the building will walk out to the west. As we understand it, approximately 4 to 6 feet of fill will be placed above the lower floor level on the east side of the building. The proposed lower floor level is indicated on Fig. 2. If the design varies from the project description presented above, the reccumendations presented in this report should be reevaluated. SITE CONDITIONS At the time of -the field exploration, the proposed building area consisted of a relatively flat vacant area with an existing house and garage located at the south end of building site. The site was vegetated with grass and weeds. The topography across the building site appeared natural. Existing Monfort Corporate Office buildings were located just north of the proposed building area. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS The subsurface conditions were explored by drilling four exploratory borings at the locations shown -on Fig. 1 . The borings were -advanced through the overburden soils with 4-inch diameter continuous flight augers. Samples of the subsoils were obtained for classification and laboratory testing. Graphic logs of the borings are presented on Fig. 2 with a legend and explanatory notes. The subsoils found in the borings generally consisted of fine to medium grained silty to clayey sands with interlayered sandy to very sandy clay. The occurrence of the clayey materials was greater at depth. The silty to Chen&Associates 9:A11.41 -4- occasionally clayey sands in approximately the upper 5 feet had a low moisture content. The subsoils were more moist with depth. Penetration resistance values indicates the granular subsoils are generally medium dense to occasionally loose and the clays -are stiff to very stiff. The results of swell-consolidation tests conducted on samples of the upper silty to clayey sands indicate they will undergo compression when wetted under constant load. The underlying sandy clay materials exhibit very little compression to slight swelling when wetted under constant load. Ground water was not detected in the borings at the time of drilling. When the site was visited one week after drilling to check the borings for ground water, the previously existing house and garage on the south portion of the site had been removed and the site had been regraded. We were unable to locate the borings at that time. FOUNDATION -RECOMMENDATIONS Considering the -subsurface conditions encountered in the exploratory borings and the nature of the proposed construction, we recommend the proposed building be founded on spread footings placed on the undisturbed natural soils or properly compacted structural fill. Since the natural silty to clayey sands tend to compress when wetted, we recommend a relatively low allowable soil bearing pressure for footings placed on the undisturbed natural soils to reduce the chances of damage in the event the foundation soils are wetted over the life of the facility. The design soil bearing pressure may be increased by overexcavating the foundation areas and replacing the material properly compacted. 930141 Chen&Associates -5- The design and construction criteria presented below should be observed for a spread footing foundation system. The construction details should be considered when preparing project documents. (1 ) Footings placed on the undisturbed natural soils should be designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 1 ,500 psf. (2) The allowable soil bearing pressure may be increased to 3000 psf by overexcavating the natural undisturbed materials and replacing the material _properly compacted. The footing areas should be overexcavated to a depth of 2 feet for a footing width of 2 feet or less, or to a depth of 5 feet for footing widths of 5 feet or more. The depth of overexcavation should equal the footing width for widths between 2 and 5 feet. The excavated material should be replaced properly compacted to 100% of the maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content within 2 percentage points of optimum. New fill should extend down from the edges of the footings at a 1/2 horizontal to 1 vertical projection. This will require overexcavating the foundation areas laterally as well as downward. (3) Based on experience, we estimat-e total settlement for footings designed and constructed as discussed in this section -will be approximately 1 inch or less. (4) Footings should have a minimum width of 16 inches for continuous footings and 24 inches for isolated pads. 930441 Chen&Associates -6- (5) Exterior footings should be provided with adequate soil cover above their bearing elevation for frost protection. Placement of foundations at least 30 inches below the exterior grade is typically used in this area. (6) Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span an unsupported length of at least 10 feet. (7) It is possible existing fill materials or other unsuitable materials will be found in foundation excavations. The proposed building area overlaps the location of an old garage building which has been removed. Areas of existing fill or other deleterious substances should be removed and the footings extended to adequate natural bearing material. As an alternative, the removed materials may be replaced in accordance with the recommendations for structural fill in item 2 of this section. (8) Granular foundation soils should be compacted with a smooth vibratory compactor prior to placement of concrete. (9) Care should be taken when excavating the foundations to avoid disturbing the supporting materials. FLOOR SLABS The natural on-site soils, exclusive of topsoil, are suitable to support lightly to moderately loaded slab-on-grade construction. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs should be separated fran all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. We suggest joints be provided on the order of 930141 Chen&Associates -7- 15 feet on center. The requirements for slab reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use. A free-draining gravel layer is not required below the floor slabs as a drainage medium to control ground-water seepage. However, if concrete moisture in the slab is of concern, for example, if impervious floor coverings such as tile is proposed, separating the slab from the subgrade soils should be considered. This can be accomplished by placing a free-draining gravel layer at least 3 inches thick or an impervious barrier beneath the slab. The gravel layer is a more positive method. If a vapor barrier is used, its effect on the concrete mix and curing conditions of the slab should be considered. Fill placed beneath floor slabs should be a nonexpansive material such as the on-site sands. The soil engineer should evaluate the suitability of proposed fill materials. Fill should be placed and compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density near the optimum moisture content. FOUNDATION WALLS Foundation walls which are laterally supported and can be expected to undergo only a moderate amount of deflection should be designed for a lateral earth pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of 50 pcf for backfill consisting of the on-site soils. All foundation walls should be designed for surcharge pressures such as traffic, construction materials and equipment. The pressure recommended above assumes drained conditions behind the walls and a horizontal backfill 9301141 Chen&Associates -8- surface. The build-up of water behind a wall or an upward sloping backfill surface will increase the lateral pressure imposed on a foundation wall. The lateral resistance of foundation wall footings placed on undisturbed natural soils or properly compacted fill material will be a combination of the sliding resistance of the footings on the foundation materials and passive earth pressure against the side of the footings. Resistance to sliding at the bottoms of the footings can be calculated based on a coefficient of friction of 0.35. Passive pressure against the sides of the footings can be calculated using an equivalent fluid unit weight of 200 pcf. Compacted fill placed against the sides of the footings to resist lateral loads should be a nonexpansive material. Fill should be placed and compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Wall backfill should be placed in uniform lifts and compacted to 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density in landscape areas and 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density in pavement areas. Care should be taken not to overcompact the backfill since this could cause excessive lateral pressure on the walls. WATER SOLUBLE' SULFATES The concentrations of water soluble sulfates measured in two samples obtained from the borings were 0.002 and 0.004 percent. These concentrations of water soluble sulfates represent a negligible degree of sulfate attack on concrete exposed to these materials. The degree of attack is based on a range of negligible, positive, severe and very severe as presented in the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Concrete Manual. Based on this information, we believe 9301.41 Chen&Associates -9- special sulfate resistant cement will not be required for concrete exposed to the on-site soils. SURFACE DRAINAGE The upper silty sands on the site were found to exhibit a potential to compress when wetted. It will be extremely important to grade the site to prevent wetting of the foundation soils. Failure to do so could result in unacceptable foundation movements. The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the building has been canpleted. (1 ) Excessive wetting or drying of the foundation -excavations and underslab areas should be avoided during construction. (2) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of 12 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in paved areas. (3) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. (4) Excessive landscape irrigation should be avoided within 10 feet of the foundation walls. LIMITATIONS This report has been prepared in accordance with 'generally accepted soil and foundation engineering practices in this area for use by the client for design purposes. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report 9-01.41 Chen&Associates -10- are based upon the data obtained fran the exploratory borings drilled at the locations indicated on the exploratory boring plan, and the proposed type of construction. The nature and extent of subsurface variations across the site may not became evident until excavation is performed. If during construction, fill, soil, or water conditions appear to be different fran those described herein, this office should be advised at once so reevaluation of the recommendations may be made. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata by a representative of the soil engineer. p,G U RE(/;,",-, tv J 'r CL is CHEN & ASSOCIATES, M . BY ^' Sf Alan Claybou P.E. ton ;L C' Q a _1 ig % Reviewed $y 4/477241) Lei � Harold Hollingsworth, Jr. , T.E. AFC/djb 930141 Chen&Associates O p-_,*O et, E ii /,� VJ N CD Z N U _ N O Z m v Y Xcc E o H X Q O m O d J a a Q x W LL O Z O I-- < U O [..=--=---= -----_ av __________\ \ 11 \ \ \ r \ _, , I / Z U 1 \\ I (// v~i Y 1 \ .O W \ \\\` U I W I J W p Z 11 ~ O O r� J/� O(7 CC Q / 1 n W ZI I o K \ / , W I I O4 O 0 O I I w U ffo Lo Y \� „ v U m I N 4. L. \ o I a CO L O U \ \ \\ \ ItJ F O \\ N O o_ = O cc W .......\\ \ \ _. •_ \ U N \ �_�Z z\ � ii \ Z Q Q �� N Y 4,4 \ O f'�`W a o 17 Z I n Y Ly K I X Q 1/ �1 W d L U' ` I CD � L_-- J m Q U U' - Z d Y W Vl 4.)rr ♦Y y CA• � "Vy C ai U co co >.— 4-, T-0 4- E 0 • _c 7 3 I --I' >. C 0 0 •- v 0 x a) m v a) 0 c_ E E eil N 0 0 _ _•„ 0 E C " c 0 u .0 0 L - Lr. 0 m 0) m > E u E O L u 4- N L C V-.- 3 X • C — 0 4+ .0•- 0 4-— 0 �'0 0• 0 0 I� 0 0 00-' L E `�' C 0 — u I!� m 00 E E 33 0 004 a•-_O 0 >, 0 c l0 7 r• 0 > •`� m - m > m 0 U Z v >"3 °0 0 Vf _o 0 ^ 0 U1 3 0 u M 0 a 4- C 0 0 3 D)0 cw9 > 4 0 E L I. L O v c w L - X_ L 0 J 0 - 0 O C ^ 7 0 0 0 0 0 • m a v 0 E Vt m 0 .- 0 0- 0 0)r0- 0 • > E •_o 0 C m 0 .0 7 0 0.E O1 0•- 00— Z 4- C )) _ 0 L O 0 E •-— 4-, 1- 0-C >•- m v 0 0 4- C 0 m u 0 U- 0 0) > 0 0,_ 0 •- OCC O • 0 01 0 C 0 0 0 L _ 0 C o L C 0 f0 0 - '^ 44 T.E E— v v 3 0 00 3 O c 01 0 c c N mw ^ 0 0 J v0 4- 3 c 0 3 'o v 7 0,.— L ^ 0 m 0 .-L C .- U y1 O a 0 u1 1 -o c0 0.0 O cc O _ 0 44 T L 0 m 0 C 0 0.3 m 0) 0 -0 u 01 u C m C 0 0 .0 0 t0 ON H Z H 00 0 0 E v 0 C O N 01≤ C I- E O 0 N >. v •3 [C Z0 m 0 0 p"V • - C-C .-.- L 0 0 L u u r0 t0 u 0 O 0 Q C L 4-_0 C.0000 ut E E 0� Z J L 0 E u 0 • a 0 7 r0 u • u O._ ' - 0 " >-•- 0 0 - C M VI T.0 L_ T 0 C OU C •• C - W > C m-0 C >•- J N 0 J L L O L L 0 C•_ 3 - 0 .- O C O 01- "- _ - 0 0 L E 4- E V U C 0 J � N CO.0 C 0 N a u O V1 J 4- 0.-. X O u L. 0) •_ C •- L 3 c m VI u - CO m•- C O . - 0 m 4 CO .0 ✓. 0 0 .. ` 0 L v E .. 0 0 v) a a)---0 N >- C I 0^^ 01 u 0 - 0 0 u 0 C C•- W 4- C 0 u 0 _ 00 u N - CO a C C,- J a u.0 CO C C f0 u K C 0 u- 0 � ^ 0 - 0 V " E - 0 a u X 0 u 00 m 0 >01•- OJ 0 -.0._ 0 O L (0.0 L U X m O t `J 0 u m u H u m E Uva Y ^ 0 N 0 0 - - 0 .0 L 0 00 4-,4- 0 U +3-4 C 0 3 OW O O C J•- _ ^'0 E a 0-E m 0,4- 004-, m .00.C #-- H O c 0 u J 0 Z " Z 1`0 0. REo N REo C L 0 ° 0 0 Lm-0 0 4-4 v W >- L o L �'0 N N L ° E V1 L C 0 0 0 L-0 m .K 0 0 J 0 0 C v O L 0 O v 0 u 1p C4- 0 C•- L 0 a C 3 010 u L 0_ IT r0 a04- 0 •- (00. 0 c al m OH m >"m •- 0 > O1 > > C•- -0 01•u X •- -0•-Q 30 II J a a m•- C CO C m•- •- ._ J 0 4-' C 41— 0•- •— 4000-0. .• 0 — 0 m L m L..- L O H O E an 01 V) 01 01 O 0 a 0 •• a U U•U 0 > O C 0 0 001 0. 0- m II 11 00 II II LLI Z N X C 0 m- 0 L 0 v1 L 0 A L L Q 0 O N J- 2 N. O W._J a W H U J H u 0'0 J 3 0 I J a W �`l•\lEi0 E3 --I J-L N Z N M -1' LI, 4p t\ ,.- 133d - N0IIV11313 IIIIIIIIII I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I o LC, o v, o LI, o v, O 0, 0, CO 00 t\ f"---- ur N 0 0 I-n 0 cc, .M N •00 II 4O II N_ N N N 0 ,— IX,0,0 N N. N \ II II 0 II II N \ VD Ca) 4O O O N J-v) M \ I- Ir 3 0 I J a 3 0, II i x w m cc, •#0 •mac I. N n 0 II 4O Cr, N N N N O M II II 0 II II \ \ N- tu-, \ T \0 0 N 4- a' 0 -.1- 04-, 0,3, O I J p. N 0 w K O O J LL • N- CI N n N ^L0• O N N I M N N 0 \ II a 0 \ \ \ \ \ 0 0. �3 N 4o 4.0 O 0) 0 _ N N N N C II a v Z X O K a co 0 a •.0 0 N N •jI 'I1 n 0 II v WI co) 0 0 u-4 0 Lo O 4.,-,0 1 N- N. I CO V I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II .0 133J - N0IlVA313 00 CA-1-79 chen and associates, inc. Moisture Content= 7. 1 percent Dry Unit Weight = 110.8 pcf Sample of: Sandy clay From: Hole 1 at depth 10 feet Expansior under constant pressure upon wett ng Ln a> L a 2 0 U 0 1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf Moisture Content = 5• 1 percent Dry Unit Weight = 96. 6 pcf 0 w - Sample of: Silty sand c From: Hole 2 at depth 2 feet o 1 Add' tional compress ior I ' L under constant pressure 0 2 dur, to wetitinq U 3 . 5 6 . (1\\ ',.. . . _ 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 856 87 CWFI I _f`,(-1NCflI If1ATION TFCT RFCI II TC 1 n1 1- CA-1-79 then and associates, inc. Moisture Content = 17.8 percent Dry Unit Weight = 108.9 pcf Sample of: Sandy clay From: Hole 3 at depth 9 feet I ono 0 - ' •\dcitional corrpress `o� .uncer constant pressure 1 _ _ fittF to wattIncirt o. L 2 U 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf Moisture Content = 5.8 percent Dry Unit Weight = 98,7 pcf Sample of: Silty clayey sand From. Hole 14 at depth 3 feet 0 c l Additional compresSron tnder constant pressure due to wetting. O v 3 4 5 6 70.1 1.o io 100 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 9301.41. 4 8S6 87 SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Fin T - — - - - C (D vi >- i 4) r >- "V >- T- -Y (0 C (p <13 _J CO U V) U U v¢ m - C -- C — (p .- (1 . V) V) N V) ^ N V' O O l"''' O o ...1 o 0 ow (n zN- Ti; W oaw n z �V 2 U I �J U X_ 'O o° cn W 7_, Q?_ w a .- i , w on f n - _r m a _f_ sr)m c M N u/�w O . - -. .- . , , , _. . . S..� `1 A o -?• -> '.D r- sr) (— 4t P-0 m <2� s•-0 N CO M C-c p- O ( .- . . 1 _ _ , . . s . m UU a Z Q LL O CO .D CJl n cr Y -oZ• LL.. co co 7 �i O O Cn. z <w z r- CO CO r^ ,_�ti o N- LP) r lIl CI) �Nz- Z2O I- 1 w O N Ql M O C— r¢ c0 w %.D t Lf) a w O N M - S 9: 0141 Hello