The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About900783.tiff RESOLUTION RE: APPROVE SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT FOR LIVESTOCK CONFINEMENT OPERATION - PICKERT WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners held a public hearing on the 29th day of August, 1990, at the hour of 10 : 00 a.m. in the Chambers of the Board for the purpose of hearing the application of William Bradley Pickert and Everdina Ann Marie Pickert, 19504 Weld County Road 5 , Berthoud, Colorado 80513 , for a Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit for a Livestock confinement operation (1,000 head dairy with six residences) on the following described real estate, to-wit: Part of the W; of Section 28 , Township 4 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado WHEREAS, Bradley Pickert, one of the applicants, was present, and WHEREAS, Section 24 .4 . 2 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance provides standards for review of said Special Review Permit, and WHEREAS, the Board o£ County Commissioners heard all of the testimony and statements of those present, has studied the request of the applicant and the recommendations of the Weld County Planning Commission and all of the exhibits and evidence presented in this matter and, having been fully informed, finds that this request shall be approved for the following reasons: 1. The submitted materials are in compliance with the application requirements of Section 24 . 7 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 2 . It is the opinion of the Board of County Commissioners that the applicant has shown compliance with Section 24 .4 .2 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows : PL0815 900783 Page 2 RE: USR - PICRF.RT a. The proposal is consistent with the intent of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan Agricultural Goals and Policies are intended to support and preserve agricultural industries and farming. b. The proposed use is a livestock confinement operation and is provided for as a Use by Special Review in the Agricultural Zone District. c. The uses permitted will be compatible with the existing surrounding land uses and with the future development for the surrounding area as permitted by the Agricultural Zone District. The surrounding land uses include agricultural production, dairy operation, and rural residences. d. No overlay districts affect the site. e. Special Review Permit Development Standards will provide adequate protection of the health, safety, and welfare of the neighborhood and County. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the application for a Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit for a Livestock confinement operation (1,000 head dairy with six residences) on the hereinabove described parcel of land be , and hereby is, granted subject to the following conditions: 1 . The attached Development Standards for the Special Review Permit shall be adopted and placed on the Special Review plat prior to recording the plat. The plat shall be delivered to the Department of Planning Services and be ready for recording in the Weld County Clerk and Recorder' s Office within 15 days of approval by the Board of County Commissioners. 2 . The Special Review activity shall not occur nor shall any building or electrical permits be issued on the property until the Special Review plat is ready to be recorded in the office of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. 900783 Page 3 RE: USR - PICKERT 3 . Prior to recording, the Special Review plat shall be amended to show the lagoon berm 50 feet from the center line of Weld County Road 5. 4 . Within 30 days of approval by the Board of County Commissioners, an ISDS evaluation on all septic systems shall be completed prior to issuing the required septic permits on all existing systems. The above and foregoing Resolution was , on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 29th day of August, A.D. , 1990. ATTEST: / 141444C7 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County Clerk to the Board EXCUSED \nI Gene R. Brant,Cn/err,, Chairman BY: d K �4l vV oom . George Kennedy, Pro-Ts;P74.--- Deputy erk to the Board APPROVED AS TO FORM: Constance L. arbert C.W. Kirby County Attorney EXCUSED DATE OF SIGNING - AYE Gordon E. Lacy 900783 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS WILLIAM BRADLEY PICKERT AND EVERDINA ANN MARIE PICKERT 1. The Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit is for a livestock confinement operation (1,000 head dairy with up to six dwellings) as submitted in the application materials on file in the Department of Planning Services and subject to the Development Standards stated herein. 2. Approval of this plan may create a vested property right pursuant to Article 68 of Title 24 , C.R.S. , as amended. 3 . The applicant shall remove, handle, and stockpile manure from the livestock confinement area in a manner that will prevent nuisance conditions. The manure piles shall not be allowed to exist or deteriorate to a condition that facilitates excessive odors, flies or insect pests, or pollutant runoff. The manure storage site shall have a water tight surface which does not permit seepage or percolation of manure pollutants into the ground. 4. The facility shall be in compliance at all times with the State Health Department Regulations, Colorado Guidelines for Feedlot Runoff Containment. 5. The facility shall comply with all State Health Department requirements for construction and operation of a dairy. Waste disposal retention and containment facilities shall be reviewed and approved by the Weld County Health Department and constructed in compliance with State statutes. 6 . Waste oil, waste paints, stains, treatments, spent drug containers , empty livestock dip containers, anti-freeze, and other associated liquid and solid wastes shall be stored and removed for final disposal in a manner that protects against surface and groundwater contamination. 7 . No permanent disposal of wastes shall be permitted at this site. 8 . Wood shavings, sawdust, and waste materials shall be handled, stored, and disposed of in a manner that controls fugitive dust, blowing debris, and other potential nuisance conditions . 900783 Page 2 RE: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - PICKERT 9 . Fugitive dust shall be controlled on this site . 10 . Runoff from the livestock confinement operation shall be contained on site. 11 . All construction on the property shall be in accordance with the requirements of the Weld County Building Code Ordinance. 12 . The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Operation Standards of Section 24. 5 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 13 . The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Operation Standards of Section 24 .6 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 14. Personnel from the State Health Department, the Weld County Health Department and the Weld County Department of Planning Services shall be granted access onto the property at any reasonable time in order to ensure the activities carried out on the property comply with the Development Standards stated herein and all applicable Weld County Regulations . 15 . The Special Review area shall be limited to the plans shown herein and governed by the foregoing Standards and all applicable Weld County Regulations. Major changes from the plans or Development Standards as shown or stated shall require the approval of an amendment of the Permit by the Weld County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners before such changes from the plans or Development Standards are permitted. Any other changes shall be filed in the office of the Department of Planning Services. 16 . The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with all of the foregoing Development Standards. Noncompliance with any of the foregoing Development Standards may be reason for revocation of the Permit by the Board of County Commissioners. 900783 HEARING CERTIFICATION DOCKET NO. 90-35 RE: SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT FOR LIVESTOCK CONFINEMENT OPERATION - PICKERT A public hearing was conducted on August 29, 1990, at 10:00 A.M. , with the following present: Commissioner Gene R. Brantner, Chairman - Excused Commissioner George Kennedy, Pro-Tem Commissioner Constance L. Harbert Commissioner C.W. Kirby Commissioner Gordon E. Lacy Also present: Acting Clerk to the Board, Tommie Antuna Assistant County Attorney, Lee D. Morrison Planning Department representative, Keith Schuett The following business was transacted: I hereby certify that pursuant to a notice dated August 13, 1990, and duly published August 16, 1990, in The New News, a public hearing was conducted to consider a Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit for a livestock confinement operation (1,000 head dairy with six residences) requested by William Bradley Pickert and Everdina Ann Marie Pickert. Lee Morrison, Assistant County Attorney, made this matter of record. Keith Schuett, representing the Department of Planning Services, entered the favorable recommendation of the Planning Commission into the record. Mr. Schuett said this recommendation is subject to four Conditions and sixteen Development Standards. Brad Pickert, one of the applicants, came forward to answer questions of the Board. Mr. Pickert said he has no problem with the Conditions and Standards. There was no public comment offered concerning this matter. Commissioner Lacy moved to approve this Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit subject to the recommended Conditions and Development Standards. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Harbert, and it carried unanimously. This Certification was approved on the 5th day of September, 1990. APPROVED: ATTEST: Alga'th BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County Clerk to the Board EXCUSED (\�' n �J �y� n n Gene R. Brantnerr/Chairman BY: `.J/ kin()/ 0 .L()b. ,� _._yam_ ` �� Deputy erk to the Board Gennedy, Pro-Tem Constance L. Harbert f't�-may C.W. Kirby EXCUSED DATE OF APPROVAL Gordon E. Lacy TAPE #90-32 DOCKET #90-35 PL0815 900783 ATTENDANCE RECORD PLEASE write or print legibly your name, address and the name of the applicant or Docket # for the hearing you are attending. TODAY' S HEARINGS ARE AS FOLLOWS: DOCKET # c 1 c hct fd Ne Ss e._ tJ � , J y 3 DOCKET # ?/1�7� �-S � .*L 5 O r 7 y DOCKET # 79�iii �m ka ,p,,. 4 ii-'26--4.--' U 35 NAME ADDRESS HEARING ATTENDING `J C.44-1 c� �'- . lei.,c L� _ >eN r_S c- , Cam, &C0 NOSE OSE /1 41r7 / ti `hlaA l < . 1 h��S .4.4..r3-1.,1 �r A icr. r/-y, . 1 I 5. f3Uc H rforat /9oe Nlf'nz_7 eTec?�; Pc z. aQ LOA 344oEvEmflit) 2472 GOCP 73 a66E11 CI) /, c 1 tt rn _7:O ( _S h,-� ,_,,,m n 0..) 4 , Ar Z r t7 � VAO,Y rs> i I ry /G :461 leij :2,4e,?/ ____? 29c ze76,e/g M 6:er-t; Ct� tD7S� // Li 3 3 77 z- _,�t.� z C 7 'j2�_ • 2-A m-- i.Ste`140' �f/iL// r�+�-t y e q ); (�7[177771t y_et A -( c� _ n e a , '&//o 5 ,e(i e( pr -1 / ce-6 , 2=� �lz s zot, 3E/e/ w CC / s' (J,1. ke CO IJIF !/' E/CFFRSo-v 3/T .0.4 n-i- /7_, ‘a <.e4ci:on eo,/, 1,, ci Ffr.27,,, 7��/� ere yilis" I/097`17T 4grezcf CO go6�i /4-5.."-FJ Ji��- .14 A.D-C1-_r a� 5 32 q6 . Co .¢ s- . 3 T Tarr c.o.L L A,./e, s+<z� it -Ps.., ,.u; lkirk! Sro ,fr, I/tJ4 (lf/J 4-1914-(31-1- 1 ( /9-S itioQ�a�Thei-^", -lin� ,dh2 ,,t, ��1 3�ys.2 �lw a S? Z,e��dri (%a kYlcf n / ' jk a-.. ,AZ/S. 5 ssr3 -5-o__«i93.- G, tfe L��;//4 Cel / 61-r— _/-1 02-6 (1.7,-144 14-4 4 ( et^}"1.4441 t ?.,5-04(4-z,„ )6 6��-�� a_ 9CG783 f EXHIBIT INVENTORY CONTROL SHEET Case 125R- Pt-t l4 Exhibit Submitted By Exhibit Description S7/3 B. d6A k AOKli a ��0.41,6m) ghat; SID. \JA D/i2, E. 53/41 F. \FILO P i t (7nfh.toll W ) Any/nail va,2G• PPP/LAC/it (S/I_& (84/ tab � j Sh5H. 6017,tv_.1 vi tOn.„ I. J. R. L. M. N. 3 0. INVEN"41RY OF ITEMS SUBMITTED FOR CONSIIJIRATION Case Number USR-922 Submitted or Prepared Prior to Hearing At Hearing 1. Application 27 Pages X 2. One application plat(s) one page(s) X 3. DPS Referral Summary Sheet X 4. DPS Recommendation X 5. DPS Surrounding Property Owner's Mailing List X 6. DPS Mineral Owner's Mailing List X 7. Two DPS Maps Prepared by Planning Technician X 8. DPS Notice of Hearing X 9. DPS Case File Summary Sheet X 10. DPS Field Check X 11. Memo dated August 3, 1990, from Wes Potter, X Weld County Health Department 12. Memo dated July 26, 1990, from Don Carroll, X Weld County Engineering Department 13. Referral response dated July 25, 1990, from X Ed Herring, Weld County Sheriff's Department/ Office of Emergency Management 14. Referral response dated July 30, 1990, from X Stephen Charles, Berthoud FPD 15. Memo dated August 21, 1990, from Gene Inlose, X Weld County Extension Service 16. Referral response dated July 26, 1990, from X Louis Bein, Starbird Ditch Company 17. Memo dated July 18, 1990, from Judy Schmidt, X Environmental Health 18. Letter dated August 20, 1990, from Big Thompson X Soil Conservation District 19. Letter dated august, 1990, from C.L. Cantrell X 20. Board of County Commissioners Resolution for X preadvertising 21. Notice for Board of County Commissioners Hearing X I hereby certify that the 21 items identified herein were submitted to the Department of Planning Services at or prior to the scheduled Planning Commission hearing. I further certify that these items were forwarded to the Clerk to the Board's office on August 22, 1990. d cZrfr Current P anner STATE OF COLORADO ) COUNTY. WELD ) \liBSCR'IVEbltAfiD SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS 'a day of () 199p . -.«.• • fluI1\CPQ . �0 c• ( OHO ; NOOTRY PUBLIC ta 'cats twos ten My Commission Expires • 9(078 3 My Commission Expires Feb. 13, 1993 itt �t� STATE OF COLORADO 1 )s.s. COUNTY OF WELD ) David B. Reynolds, being duly sworn, says that he is publisher of The New News, a weekly newspaper published in Keenesburg in said County and State; that said newspaper has a PUBLIC NOTICE general circulation in said County Board el Co'xitY and has been continously and of Weld Couaq, uninterruptedly published therein, �' °" pmivelopmeitedp�igust �a stw during a period of at least Review erwu�d�� fifty-two consecutive weeks prior to Fty c°"dondtavw�+t of the first publication of the annexed d rt�ht �t°�. notice; that said newspaper is a � '°f �18arBradle newspaper within the meaning of the �Everdtna Mn Marie act of the General Assembly of the ON: Part of State of Colorado, entitled "An Act uieG ?arornah► to regulate the printing n t i n o f legal a 1 p. �' R AtD "'e" w7rEC°t°'xt4sTrd'tr of P 9 g rm Weld notices and advertisements, " and =gra uuv- f amendments thereto; that the notice mgairy ithaixressiidences.' of which the annexed is a printed SIZE F PARCEL: 47 acres, more or copy taken from said newspaper, wastoi dthaethtesom `�'d published in said newspaper, and in in°a if°di bro` the regular and entire issue of pf�o a;�p; Il, every number thereof , WELD COUNTY CDLON,A'" once a week for i pug B��Yarunt= successive weeks; that said notice in New was so published in said newspaper proper and not in any supplement thereof , and that the first publication of said notice as aforesaid , was on the day of -�S f , 19 I c lD , and the last on the ko day of Subscribed and swor t% before me this � it' day of ..„„detCc`.,c 1�, , 19 7e. C'e 33 42-14-1.eL. -my co 'T11k—„;on c arc � ' V ti 2 RI 3. 341 BEFORE THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, PLANNING CO G k: D RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Moved by LeAnn Reid that the following resolution be introduced for passage by the Weld County Planning Commission. Be it Resolved by the Weld County Planning Commission that the application for: CASE NUMBER: USR-922 NAME: William Bradley Pickert and Everdina AnnaMarie Pickert ADDRESS: 19504 Weld County Road 5, Berthoud, CO 80513 REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a Livestock Confinement Operation (1,000 head dairy with up to 6 dwellings) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the W1 of Section 28, T4N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: South of Weld County Road 42 and east of and adjacent to Weld County Road 5 / be recommended favorably to the Board of County Commissioners for the / following reasons. 1. The submitted materials are in compliance with the application requirements of Section 24.7 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 2. It is the opinion of the Weld County Planning Commission that the applicant has shown compliance with Section 24.3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: - The proposal is consistent with the intent of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan Agricultural Goals and Policies are intended to support and preserve agricultural industries and farming. The proposed use is a livestock confinement operation and is provided for as a use by special review in the Agricultural zone district. The uses permitted will be compatible with the existing surrounding land uses and with the future development of the surrounding area as permitted by the Agricultural zone district. The surrounding land uses include agricultural production, dairy operation, and rural residences. - No overlay districts affect the site. - Special Review permit Development Standards will provide adequate protection of the health, safety, and welfare 61941 Che neighborhood and County. USR-922 William Bradley and Everdina AnnaMarie Pickert Page 2 This recommendation is based, in part, upon a review of the application materials submitted by the applicant, other relevant information regarding the request, and responses from referral entities which have reviewed this request. The Planning Commission's recommendation for approval is conditional upon the following: 1. The attached Development Standards for the Special Review permit shall be adopted and placed on the Special Review plat prior to recording the plat. The plat shall be delivered to the Department of Planning Services and be ready for recording in the Weld County Clerk and Recorder's office within 15-days of approval by the Board of County Commissioners. 2. The Special Review activity shall not occur nor shall any building or electrical permits be issued on the property until the Special Review plat is ready to be recorded in the office of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. 3. Prior to recording, the Special Review plat shall be amended to show the lagoon berm 50-feet from the centerline of Weld County Road 5. 4. Within 30 days of approval by the Board of County Commissioners, an ISDS evaluation on all septic systems shall be completed prior to issuing the required septic permits on all existing systems. Motion seconded by Bud Clemons. VOTE: For Passage Against Passage Ann Garrison Jean Hoffman Richard Kimmel Judy Yamaguchi LeAnn Reid Rick Iverson Bud Clemons Jerry Kiefer The Chairman declared the resolution passed and ordered that a certified copy be forwarded with the file of this case to the Board of County Commissioners for further proceedings. 9C 0'x'83 USR-922 William Bradley and Everdina AnnaMarie Pickert Page 3 CERTIFICATION OF COPY I, Bobbie Good, Recording Secretary of the Weld County Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution is a true copy of the Resolution of the Planning Commission of Weld County, Colorado, adopted on August 21, 1990, and recorded in Book No. RIII of the proceedings of the Planning Commission. Dated the 22nd of August, 1990. 'jmw _.: ., Qoe, c Bobbie Good 1 Secretary Qr �.. t.jf SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS William Bradley Pickert and Everdina AnnaMarie Pickert USR-922 1. The Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review permit is for a livestock confinement operation (1,000 head dairy with up to 6 dwellings) as submitted in the application materials on file in the Department of Planning Services and subject to the Development Standards stated hereon. 2. Approval of this plan may create a vested property right pursuant to Article 68 of Title 24 C.R.S. , as amended. 3. The applicant shall remove, handle, and stockpile manure from the livestock confinement area in a manner that will prevent nuisance conditions. The manure piles shall not be allowed to exist or deteriorate to a condition that facilitates excessive odors, flies or insect pests, or pollutant runoff. The manure storage site shall have a water-tight surface which does not permit seepage or percolation of manure pollutants into the ground. 4. The facility shall be in compliance at all times with the State Health Department Regulations, Colorado Guidelines for Feedlot Runoff Containment. 5. The applicant shall comply with all State Health Department requirements for construction and operation of a dairy. Waste disposal retention and containment facilities shall be reviewed and approved by the Weld County Health Department and constructed in compliance with State Statutes. 6. Waste oil, waste paints, stains, treatments, spent drug containers, empty livestock dip containers, anti-freeze, and other associated liquid and solid wastes shall be stored and removed for final disposal in a manner that protects against surface and groundwater contamination. 7. No permanent disposal of wastes shall be permitted at this site. 8. Wood shavings, sawdust, and waste materials shall be handled, stored, and disposed of in a manner that controls fugitive dust, blowing debris, and other potential nuisance conditions. 9. Fugitive dust shall be controlled on this site. q, 0'78 .r+, Development Standards USR-922 Page 2 10. Runoff from the livestock confinement operation shall be contained on site. 11. All construction on the property shall be in accordance with the requirements of the Weld County Building Code Ordinance. 12. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Design Standards of Section 24.5 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 13. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Operation Standards of Section 24.6 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 14. Personnel from the State Health Department the Weld County Health Department and Weld County Department of Planning Services shall be granted access onto the property at any reasonable time in order to ensure the activities carried out on the property comply with the Development Standards stated hereon and all applicable Weld County Regulations. 15 The Special Review area shall be limited to the plans shown hereon and governed by the foregoing Standards and all applicable Weld County Regulations. Major changes from the plans or Development Standards as shown or stated shall require the approval of an amendment of the Permit by the Weld County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners before such changes from the plans or Development Standards are permitted. Any other changes shall be filed in the office of the Department of Planning Services. 16. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with all of the foregoing Development Standards. Noncompliance with any of the foregoing Development Standards may be reason for revocation of the Permit by the Board of County Commissioners. 9C0733 3 33 PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS Pickert Dairy USR-922 LeAnn Reid moved the Planning Commission forward Case Number USR-922 for William Bradley Pickert and Everdina AnnaMarie Pickert for a Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a livestock confinement operation (1,000 head dairy with 6 residences) to the Board of County Commissioners with the our recommendation for approval based upon the recommendation, conditions, development standards, and additional comments prepared by the Department of Planning Services' staff, and the testimony heard by the Planning Commission. Motion seconded by Bud Clemons. Ann Garrison - Yes, and her reasons for voting yes are that if this is denied by us and the County Commissioners, and he has to cutback the number of head of cattle to come into compliance, the County would have no controls or way of governing what he does, including things the neighbors have complained about. By granting him this use by special review for his dairy, the County will have someway of regulating the dairy and its problems. Richard Kimmel - yes. Judy Yamaguchi - Yes. She supports what Ann just stated and, hopefully, things will work out in the neighborhood of growth over the years. Having observed the present dairy, she feels he 1s well aware of the road hazards, etc. , and will take things into consideration as he enlarges. LeAnn Reid - Yes. She was born and raised on a dairy farm and she agrees with Mr. Pickert that if its washed down wet it creates a bigger odor than if it is dry. Also, if the health department deems it necessary, they can close you down within a moments notice, and it is very hard to dispose of 50,000 gallons of milk. Rick Iverson - yes. Jean Hoffman - No. She has respected Mr. Pickert's presentation and his obvious respect from his neighbors and the cooperation shown in the community. She is interpreting the Comprehensive Plan of Weld County as far as supporting and preserving agricultural industries to mean that continuing his operation as it is, which the neighbors have vouched they do not object to, would be supporting and preserving agricultural. She too was raised on a farm and appreciate the agricultural influence of Weld County. She is impressed with her first meeting on the Planning Commission with this classic conflict between urbanization and rural needs. She would support the present operation of the Pickert dairy, and sees no reason why he couldn't be grandfathered in and continue this operation as it exists. She does, however, oppose the expansion based primarily on the Engineering Department comments and the other issues brought up about lagoons, seepage control, and the head per acre problem of intensity as it relates to odor and water problems. Cx I � 4 Planning Commission Comments Pickert Dairy USR-922 Page 2 Bud Clemons - Yes, he would like to inform the people in the audience they may certainly appear before the Board of County Commissioners when this case comes before them, and if anyone of you would like a copy of the recommendations, he is sure the staff would provide a copy to them. Be believes that while a thousand head of cattle is perhaps more than the acreage could facilitate, he feels it is better to have them under control than to have them out of compliance with no recourse. Therefore, by recommending the granting of the special use permit, he feels the County will be in a better position to enforce whatever violations there may be, which will protect everyone to a greater extent than what is now possible. Jerry Kiefer - Yes. Sp .,78 Summary o£ the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting August 21, 1990 Page 9 Keith Schuett stated this request is primarily to bring the property into conformance with the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the audience. Ise Bobletts, co-owner of property west and adjacent to the airport, stated they have always worked with the Airport Authority to enable it to grow. Their property is zoned for office use and they do not want to compete with the airport for office space. The Chairman asked Keith Schuett to read the recommendation of the Department of Planning Services' staff into the record. MOTION: Jean Hoffman moved Case Number Z-456, Greeley/Weld County Airport, for a Change of Zone from Agricultural and Industrial-Three to Planned Unit Development for Commercial-Three and Industrial-Three uses be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with the Planning Commission's recommendation for approval based upon the recommendation, conditions, and development standards presented by the Department of Planning Services' staff and the testimony heard by the Planning Commission. Motion seconded by Bud Clemons. The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Planning Commission. Discussion followed. The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Ann Garrison - yes; Richard Kimmel - yes; Judy Yamaguchi - yes; LeAnn Reid - yes; Rick Iverson - yes; Jean Hoffman. - yes; Bud Clemons - yes; Jerry Kiefer - yes. Motion carried unanimously. CASE N'U'MBER: USR-922 APPLICANT: William Bradley Pickert and Everdina AnnaMarie Pickert REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review permit for a livestock confinement operation (1,000 head dairy with 6 residences) . LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part W} of Section 28, T4N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: South of Weld County Road 42, and east of and adjacent to Weld County Road 5. •`� :inswe03 Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting August 21, 1990 Page 10 APPEARANCE: William "Brad" Pickert, property owner and applicant. "Pickert Dairy" is a family owned and operated dairy. They came here from New York and have operated the dairy at its present site for the past nine and one-half years. It has been operated as a dairy for approximately thirty-five years. They have approximately 450 head, drylot, milking herd, and calves, and are currently milking about 270 head. There are three dwellings on the property. They are enlarging only as finances allow them to, and not all at one time. He has reviewed the recommendation of the Department of Planning Services' staff and sees no problem with them. The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the audience. Tom Kelly, area farmer has objections because of the odor from an excessive number of animals concentrated in so small an area. He does not feel it is possible to control odors when there are that many animals concentrated on the property. Ronald Halverson, surrounding property owner, feels enlargement of the dairy would impact the quality of their life. Right now, Mr. Pickert runs a clean operation and is a good neighbor, but 1,000 head of cows might increase traffic, dust, and odor significantly. Dale Horning, adjacent property owner to the north, feels that because of the type of soils in this area, the Little Thompson is bound to be contaminated, and there is the possibility of a decrease in property values. Keith Schuett reported Wes Potter had advised him that a slow percolation rate is an advantage in preventing contamination of surface and subsurface • water. Lee Morrison stated the soil and slope were taken into consideration and the percolation rate is an asset. Randy Pfief, adjacent property owner, also owns a dairy, but not as large. The holding pond runs over and runs onto his property. He does not object to this request, but when the holding ponds run over he objects to the possibility of seepage into the surface and underground water and the possibility of decreased property values. Dave Schwinn, surrounding property owner, feels Mr. Pickert does a good job of operating his dairy. He buys his feed largely from area farmers and he has bought hay from him. However, he is concerned about traffic, waste management, odor, runoff, and contamination from insecticides and disinfectants. r� 009, _ Tape 387 J Summary of the Weld Ccunty Planning Commission Meeting August 21, 1990 Page 1_ Rachelle Lardall, area resident, is concerned about odor and resale value decreasing on her property. Judy Kelly, area property owner. Her primary concerns have already been expressed, but she does not see how they can evade odor. Brad Pickert stated he understands the neighbors concerns regarding these problems. However, odor from his operation should not be of great concern. He runs a dry operation and has no intention of changing this. There are dairies in the vicinity who run wet operations, and they do have problems with odor. Most of those speaking today, live upwind from the dairy, but his family lives in the middle of it and they do not like being surrounding by offensive odors either. This is an agricultural district and should not be urbanized. In the morning, they make approximately five round trips with feed, insilage, etc., and because o£ changes in operation, this should not increase much. At present the dairy supports four families and a hired man. It should take five to eight years to reach capacity. Also, he does not feel his present lagoon was engineered, and is probably just a hole that was dug to retain runoff. The new holding ponds will be installed exactly as recommended for soils type, slope, etc. Lee Morrison briefly reviewed Colorado law regarding runoff. The Chairman called a break at 4:40 p.m. The meeting was reconvened at 4:45 p.m. The Chairman asked Keith Schuett to read the recommendation of the Department of Planning Services staff into the record. MOTION: LeAnn Reid moved the Planning Commission forward Case Number USR-922 for William Bradley Pickert and Everdina AnnaMarie Pickert for a Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a livestock confinement operation (1,000 head dairy with 6 residences) to the Board of County Commissioners with the our recommendation for approval based upon the recommendation, conditions, development standards, and additional comments prepared by the Department of Planning Services' staff, and the testimony heard by the Planning Commission. Motion seconded by Bud Clemons. The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Planning Commission. Discussion followed. The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Ann Garrison - Yes, and her reasons for voting yes are that if this is denied by us and the County Commissioners, and he has to cutback the number of head of cattle to come into compliance, the County would have no controls or way of governing what he does, including things the neighbors have complained about. By granting him this use by special review for his dairy, the County will have someway of regulating the dairy and its problems. _ summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting August 21, 1990 Page 12 Richard Kimmel - yes. Judy Yamaguchi - Yes. She supports what Ann just stated and, hopefully, things will work out in the neighborhood of growth over the years. Having observed the present dairy, she feels he is well aware of the road hazards, etc. , and will take things into consideration as he enlarges. LeAnn Reid - Yes. She was born and raised on a dairy farm and she agrees with Mr. Pickert that if its washed down wet it creates a bigger odor than if it is dry. Also, if the health department deems it necessary, they can close you down within a moments notice, and it is very hard to dispose of 50,000 gallons of milk. Rick Iverson - yes. Jean Hoffman - No. She has respected Mr. Pickert's presentation and his obvious respect from his neighbors and the cooperation shown in the community. She is interpreting the Comprehensive Plan of Weld County as far as supporting and preserving agricultural industries to mean that continuing his operation as it is, which the neighbors have vouched they do not object to, would be supporting and preserving agricultural. She too was raised on a farm and appreciate the agricultural influence of Weld County. She is impressed with her first meeting on the Planning Commission with this classic conflict between urbanization and rural needs. She would support .the present operation of the Pickert dairy, and sees no reason why he couldn't be grandfathered in and continue this operation as it exists. She does, however, oppose the expansion based primarily on the Engineering Department comments and the other issues brought up about lagoons, seepage control, and the head per acre problem of intensity as it relates to odor and water problems. Bud Clemons - Yes, he would like tc inform the people in the audience they may certainly appear before the Board of County Commissioners when this case comes before them, and if anyone of you would like a copy of the recommendations, he is sure the staff would provide a copy to them. He believes that while a thousand head of cattle is perhaps more than the acreage could facilitate, he feels it is better to have them under control than to have them out of compliance with no recourse. Therefore, by recommending the granting of the special use permit, he feels the County will be in a better position to enforce whatever violations there may be, which will protect everyone to a greater extent than what is now possible. Jerry Kiefer - Yes. The meetinc was adjourned at 5:12 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Bobbie Good "1 " 1 Secretary 4,�,ur 5 'r1 I r.: Capital COY., Agricultural inn Property , - Services, Inc. Tp Weld County Commissioners P.O.Box 758 Greeley, CO 80632 Certified Mail Re: Docket No.90-35 Pickert Dairy Dear Sirs; Our company manages farmland located in the West Half of Section 28 that lies adjacent to the proposed dairy expansion. We have consulted with our landowner about the proposed dairy herd increase and would like to officially object to this expansion. We have serious concerns regarding odor,water quality and pollution and placing a very large dairy on a small tract of land. This area is too populated and the proposed site inadequate for such a large dairy. Our farm tenant,Jim Adler also objects to the proposed expansion. I am writing because it is doubtful I will be able to attend the hearing on August 29th as I will be out of town on other business. We ask that you deny the proposed change in zoning and that this dairy is not allowed to increase in size at the proposed location. Sincerely, C ice, 1N-1 Curtis Talley Jr. Farm Manager cc Jim Adler SC0383 3824 Highline Canal Road P.O. Box 1302 Palisade, Colorado 81526-1302 TEL: 303-464-5617 I-, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SIGN POSTING CERTIFICATE. I HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER THE PENALTIES OF PERJURY THAT THE SIGN PROVIDED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES WAS POSTED ON THE PROPERTY AT LEAST 1 p 10 DAYS BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER'S HEARING FOR CASE # V S /G ' / 2 Z THE SIGN WAS POSTED BY: CA G co .. Shin!Ce h�. c �te64- Or�rj NAME OF PERSON POSTING SIGN 11)UD NZ' SIGNATURE OF APPL,CANT oc- t bF cot. STATE OF COLORADO ) COUNTY OF WELD ) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS 21 DAY OF 19 `-)O SEAL c5� ? c� Yee _ NO PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES My Commission Expires Feb. 13, 1993 LAST DAY TO POST SIGN IS: 19 SC 0783 PLANNING COMMISSION SIGN POSTING CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER THE PENALTIES OF PERJURY THAT THE SIGN PROVIDED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES WAS POSTED ON THE PROPERTY AT LEAST 10 DAYS BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING FOR CASE IF V !C 3 - 7 Z Zs THE SIGN WAS POSTED BY: di- acne " p e �t NAME OF PERSON POSTING SIGN f J /.---"/7 SIGNATURE OF APPLI ;T STATE OF COLORADO ) 000 ss. COUNTY OF WELD ) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS 'al ` DAY OF cc), 19 `ECG., 0 v �SE9L'ARY .O ':k 12.C a . Pr.l�a,..A n �ocm °P CON- NO�ARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MY Commission Expires Fob. i1 ivvi LAST DAY TO POST SIGN IS: , 19 August 21, 1990 CASE NUMBER: USR-922 NAME: William Bradley Pickert and Everdina AnnaMarie Pickert ADDRESS: 19504 Weld County Road 5, Berthoud, CO 80513 REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a Livestock Confinement Operation (1,000 head dairy with up to 6 dwellings) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the W1 of Section 28, T4N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: South of Weld County Road 42 and east of and adjacent to Weld County Road 5 THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES' STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THIS REQUEST BE APPROVED FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: 1. The submitted materials are in compliance with the application requirements of Section 24.7 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 2. It is the opinion of the Department of Planning Services' staff that the applicant has shown compliance with Section 24.3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: - The proposal is consistent with the intent of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan Agricultural Goals and Policies are intended to support and preserve agricultural industries and farming. - The proposed use is a livestock confinement operation and is provided for as a use by special review in the Agricultural zone district. - The uses permitted will be compatible with the existing surrounding land uses and with the future development of the surrounding area as permitted by the Agricultural zone district. The surrounding land uses include agricultural production, dairy operation, and rural residences. No overlay districts affect the site. - Special Review permit Development Standards will provide adequate protection of the health, safety, and welfare of the neighborhood and County. This recommendation is based, in part, upon a review of the application materials submitted by the applicant, other relevant information regarding the request, and responses from referral entities which have reviewed this request. ecg781 USR-922 William Bradley and Everdina AnnaMarie Pickert Page 2 The Department of Planning Services' staff recommendation for approval is conditional upon the following: 1. The attached Development Standards for the Special Review permit shall be adopted and placed on the Special Review plat prior to recording the plat. The plat shall be delivered to the Department of Planning Services and be ready for recording in the Weld County Clerk and Recorder's office within 15-days of approval by the Board of County Commissioners. 2. The Special Review activity shall not occur nor shall any building or electrical permits be issued on the property until the Special Review plat is ready to be recorded in the office of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. 3. Prior to recording, the Special Review plat shall be amended to show the lagoon berm 50-feet from the centerline of Weld County Road 5. 4. Within 30 days of approval by the Board of County Commissioners, an ISDS evaluation on all septic systems shall be completed prior to issuing the required septic permits on all existing systems. QC 07 81 SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS William Bradley Pickert and Everdina AnnaMarie Pickert USR-922 1. The Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review permit is for a livestock confinement operation (1,000 head dairy with up to 6 dwellings) as submitted in the application materials on file in the Department of Planning Services and subject to the Development Standards stated hereon. 2. Approval of this plan may create a vested property right pursuant to Article 68 of Title 24 C.R.S. , as amended. 3. The applicant shall remove, handle, and stockpile manure from the livestock confinement area in a manner that will prevent nuisance conditions. The manure piles shall not be allowed to exist or deteriorate to a condition that facilitates excessive odors, flies or insect pests, or pollutant runoff. The manure storage site shall have a water-tight surface which does not permit seepage or percolation of manure pollutants into the ground. 4. The facility shall be in compliance at all times with the State Health Department Regulations, Colorado Guidelines for Feedlot Runoff Containment. 5. The applicant shall comply with all State Health Department requirements for construction and operation of a dairy. Waste disposal retention and containment facilities shall be reviewed and approved by the Weld County Health Department and constructed in compliance with State Statutes. 6. Waste oil, waste paints, stains, treatments, spent drug containers, empty livestock dip containers, anti-freeze, and other associated liquid and solid wastes shall be stored and removed for final disposal in a manner that protects against surface and groundwater contamination. 7. No permanent disposal of wastes shall be permitted at this site. 8. Wood shavings, sawdust, and waste materials shall be handled, stored, and disposed of in a manner that controls fugitive dust, blowing debris, and other potential nuisance conditions. 9. Fugitive dust shall be controlled on this site. Development Standards USR-922 Page 2 10. Runoff from the livestock confinement operation shall be contained on site. 11. All construction on the property shall be in accordance with the requirements of the Weld County Building Code Ordinance. 12. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Design Standards of Section 24.5 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 13. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Operation Standards of Section 24.6 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 14. Personnel from the State Health Department the Weld County Health Department and Weld County Department of Planning Services shall be granted access onto the property at any reasonable time in order to ensure the activities carried out on the property comply with the Development Standards stated hereon and all applicable Weld County Regulations. 15 The Special Review area shall be limited to the plans shown hereon and governed by the foregoing Standards and all applicable Weld County Regulations. Major changes from the plans or Development Standards as shown or stated shall require the approval of an amendment of the Permit by the Weld County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners before such changes from the plans or Development Standards are permitted. Any other changes shall be filed in the office of the Department of Planning Services. 16. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with all of the foregoing Development Standards. Noncompliance with any of the foregoing Development Standards may be reason for revocation of the Permit by the Board of County Commissioners. August 1990 To whom it may concern: I am very opposed to the Pikerts request for 1,000 head of cattle and 3 more residences. That would give us not only an extremely odorous "feed lot" but also a trailer park. Please! ! Give us a break out here. Their dairy farm is not way out away from civilization where only they have to deal with the odors of 1,000 head of cattle. There are other homes in the area--some of them rather close. This is not the place for this kind of operation. They have been out of compliance for years with the number of head they run. Why should they now be rewarded with anything they ask for? What makes you think that they would now comply with new requirements and keep only 1,000? With there past track record there'll be 1,500 head on their 35 acres. They use a county road between their pits and where the cattle are which requires many trips back and forth daily. If they are permitted to have 3 times as many head then simple math would suggest that would increase those trips by 3! ! It would mean triple the large truck loads of hay, triple the hay grinding which creates an awful green cloud of dust into the air and also triple the trucks hauling off the manure. Add this additional traffic and 2 more autos for each of 3 more residences with all the added dust in the air from the dirty, dusty roads which residents of Weld County must deal with. THIS IS NOT ACCEPTABLE! Please give us mercy. Apparently they told neighbors that they do not intend to run 1,000 head but as a matter of principle are asking for the maximum. Why do this? Could it be to keep neighbors from protesting? If they want 300, 400, 500 let their request be for what they really want. If they get their permit for 1,000 then in the future either they or someone that they might sell to could without futher conversation or how many changes might have occurred put 1,000 head on this land. Neither Pikerts or anyone they might sell to should be allowed to have that many head of cattle, and 3 more trailers on this property. Take a look for yourselves. Too many cows, too many flies, too many ODORS, too much traffic, too much dust, too much manure, and too many trailers! ! ! It doesn't seem fair that there is no requirement that a sign be posted on the site of the proposed change. Apparently people who live close received clusuttgatizzeri some sort of notice by mail, but those of us who live farther away happen to find°out through the grapevine. I 'm sure you have regulations but some of us who live in the area but not next door would like to know what's going on. or 0'783 ....------fir .: -- r _,are' a - o � a��s� AUG 2 1 1990 ‘ Weld Ck• Aaiow 0gm0Wid BIG THOMPSON SOIL CONSERVATION DISTRICT P.Q. 7195 Loveland , Colorado 90537 August 20 , 1990 Weld County Department of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley , CO 906'31 Kieth Schuett , Planner : We understand from Frank Riggle of the Soil Conservation Service , that there has been some confusion regarding the requested review of the Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review permit for the Bradley Pickert and Everdina Anna Marie Pickert 1000 head dairy , Case Number USR-922 . The Big Thompson Soil Conservation District Board of Supervisors reviewed the proposal at their regular board meeting on August 7 , 1990 . The supervisors present had no particular comments , however there were not enough members present to have a quorum. Any large-scale livestock confinement operation can present possible erosion and waste runoff problems . This project is too large an operation for the local Soil Conservation Service office to assist with the design of a waste managment system. The Board would suggest that Weld County Planning or Weld County Health determine if an adequate waste management and runoff management system needs to be developed to control possible offsite problems . Since the scope of the project is beyond the job approval authority for the local SCS office , and there was not a quorum present at the meeting, the Big Thompson Soil Conservation District has no comments about the project at this time . Sincerely , Big Thompson Soil Conservation District Board of Supervisors r C-1 j AUG 2 1 1990 L ��i LAND-USE APPLICATION SUMMARY SHEET Date: August 14, 1990 CASE NUMBER: USR-922 NAME: William Bradley Pickert and Everdina Anna Marie Pickert ADDRESS: 19504 Weld County Road 5, Berthoud, CO 80513 REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review permit for a livestock confinement operation (1,000 head dairy with up to six residences) . LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the W1 of Section 28, T4N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: South of Weld County Road 42 and east of and adjacent to Weld County Road 5. SIZE OF PARCEL: 47 Acres, POSSIBLE ISSUES SUMMARIZED FROM APPLICATION MATERIALS: The criteria for review of this Special Review permit is listed in Section 24.3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. The Department of Planning Services' staff has received specific recommendations from the Weld County Health Department and the Weld County Engineering Department. Referral responses have not been received from the State Health Depart, No objections have been received by Department of Planning Services' staff from surrounding property owners. o 078.3 60. . . . - -•:-.-.f.:—es a - r 7. „� •..p. . • :•,."...7,•.•••:' o lFF.u.s.FF GRE r• , a `C13 3:53.0 '58 .IOVFxr N4 ....%"\e• .� 1.0 1 •03 MSG 15 miw � e., ...o` .j.. "_k%Ga 54. . . . �' ��'� o ..•" k MP 5 7 eI 9 �� _c. •i 9.50 . ..M.x., i r__, n "40 f Obi I �!at F:r•1••II Cor 5 Cr �1*-All II : l L ►�a z 48 t' a • map--;la wESTERN � � N 0 -la - - -: - 'Min • Mal 1 Itir 5.41S Lite* cm as . wet u star . t .,. �, cr a = �, Ita lir . � a 42 tu �7e�. ?e . '[il � e �� wr �_ - • ili �.� - -- - - . , _. -s.40 `� t'ct ' "38 �_ rA aa' ' � �� o %r ; -. - -- III ._ �: `' � 12111111111; 1 GRE^rr� : f • , , WWI I .-. ,TAi°Y 3 , : : . • •r A I :11 3o aurrn in 23 _ ', •• . �.i IL a / �'..L� '\fa i.1CX;C: - alit `-fill' .a2 • a.0 • • • "l--, x r0. • r r . ...pillter all26 9T'� ��i _ _ yr •pSTTATE z RELS•iY MY•�F iLi b e• t _ �� ? I,ixattf VHS I+o u s rar-In •Jx. • ,; . 1 f ---� . J r I 'n�tn I � -� I +e1u. i , 22 0 •- -l" ! x• is '� _ 3' , • r 1 I • • , '�� 49-1. ll 16 ° - L - 1 �/ -------Y� �� 1 �) 974, { \ 7I " P" c �� - �.ff C �� k �M 1 ° a l(4 9.34 — 49267. 9 6 c. � _ �� I,• --- _ �a� i�� • (< f�A _ /� �s_ V V �� Id Thnanl n•� � USA Vr� 7 -j -c010 �Xrn sr ', r� C�AJ gaa �_�.----Y‹� i � �� - A ' ��1 ---- - - i fuse`-- -- — — _ - -�-/ �-� ki4ee�) �< �� / .� ------ n, J - c v, s v A.-� 49,0 ---��J//V�� <,\ 1 - - i .� V� _ ) I s "\ r�lJ °p° �� )„ �� - (f � _ U A /-_ yr L 1 - .i4H96 iI 4°m p s° V--,-( '� (24 _.\ i 1cii i ' �{� < � ) M 7i ./ 9,z ( 1 ` 1 =iir� Uo 1 • _ \\ - 2' I 969 - J 1� �� ,�� n /� �/ so so --j)h tiMH:1%-m•-- - ,, a. Imo. ,., VI w ' vie —�f �/ —\ 5 — BI°° O 1 ) , -- �\ 1 n oa y ,� 1j ' �� _II:g //J f/ "' —� �— �� f �li / o ; xri 51p° /l• �/ a � // ('�/ �1IV a x5 5,,,, �4 � \cI � 1 �� ' ),) ,);))//._„_ „„)).„4.1)--,� � ' �, ) 1 _ _______________ 0) y°2/ % /�_ If 505—x/ \�r �� / R -'_5p �I 00_/ 5089 \. . C . .�I (7.)!1"-C H --_ j • _ ■r r � . •' v5 ! �� 10 �I,I �� 5050 \_ /� 0 i �' /-„ i• °, 4 r \_,T-7 72-I � , � I: FIELD CHECK FILING NUMBER: USR-922 DATE OF INSPECTION: August 6, 1990 NAME: William Bradley Pickert REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review permit for a livestock confinement facility (1,000 dairy with up to 6 residences) . LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the Why of Section 28, T4N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: South of Weld County Road 42 and east of and adjacent to Weld County Road 5. LAND USE: N Farm production E Irrigation ditch, farm production S Farm production W Weld County Road 5, rural residence, farm production, and dairy ZONING: N A (Agricultural) E A (Agricultural) S A (Agricultural) W A (Agricultural) COMMENTS: An existing dairy operation is located on the property with dairy barn, corrals, two mobile homes, and one dwelling as shown on the Special Review plat. The property slopes from he east down to the west. Access to the property is off Weld County Road 5, a gravel county local. By: e . Schuett Current Planner FIELD CHECK g/�,, Filing Number: USR-922 Date of Inspection:('/7>F ( CC —0 Current Planner: Keith A. Schuett Applicant's Name: William Bradley Pickertand Everdina Anna Marie Pickert Request: Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review permit for a livestock confinement operation (1,000 head dairy) . Legal Description: Part of the W1 of Section 28, T4N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado Location: South of Weld County Road 42 and east of and adjacent to Weld County Road 5. i Land Use: �(/ E / l a Gi- S tyj- / w�/gin �'lck i bait an'f(w VOA Sinai p �4�i y1/1jt, Zoning: N A (Agricultural) E A (Agricultural) S A (Agricultural) W A (Agricultural) COMMENTS: 1-1io P .Asir, -- .52-w,/kJ 415 &1`.e tJwXI-, we �tbCak i,L- 6 uJC f2 .S" 11-n4 --Put o,, w ?-- tvi wifia voa— deec,/ 0,,2„ a - IA)Ca_ o -a— v .5Z. sl ris 414] we,g- scre (� �') 'NCR-4DC-.� Si ature oof Boar�Jl Memb ' SCR 5 et 0783 REFERRAL LIST NAME: William Bradley Pickert CASE NUMBER: USR-922 REFERRALS SENT: July 24, 1990 REFERRALS TO BE RECEIVED BY: August 7, 1990 COUNTY TOWNS and CITIES Attorney __Ault t/ Health Department Brighton ✓,X Extension Service �Dacono / X Emergency Management Office Eaton - Sheriff's Office Erie 7,4-Engineering _Evans Housing Authority _Firestone Airport Authority _Fort Lupton Building Inspection _Frederick __Garden City STATE Gilcrest Highway Department - Johnstown -__ Historical Society Keenesburg _ Water Conservation Board Kersey ____ Oil and Gas Conservation Commission La Salle -� �Lochbuie FIRE DISTRICTS Longmont Ault F-1 _- Mead Berthoud F-2 _ _ Milliken Brighton F-3 New Raymer _ Dacono F-19 _Nunn _ Eaton F-4 _Platteville _Fort Lupton F-5 _Severance Galeton F-6 _Windsor Hudson F-7 Johnstown F-8 COUNTIES _ La Salle F-9 Adams _Longmont F-10 _Boulder Milliken F-11 _Larimer _ _Nunn F-12 Pawnee __ Platteville F-13 FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES Platte Valley F-14 `US Army Corps of Engineers OTHER X Colorado Department of Health Dan Trimberger 4210 East 11th Avenue Denver, CO 80220 SOIL CONSERVATION DISTRICTS Brighton 0/X Starbird Ditch X Fort Collins c/o Mr. Louis Bein __Longmont P.O. Box 1079 _West Adams Berthoud, CO 80513 COMMISSION/BOARD MEMBER ✓ X Judith Yamaguchi 9C,C 6r�8 mEmoRAnDum Wilk Keith A. Schuett ro Weld County Planning Date August 3, 1990 COLORADO From Wes Potter, Director, Environmental Protection Services Case Number: USR-922 Name: Pickert, William Bradley Subject: Environmental Protection Services has reviewed this proposal and recommends for approval, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall remove, handle, and stockpile manure from the livestock confinement area in a manner that will prevent nuisance conditions. The manure piles shall not be allowed to exist or deteriorate to a condition that facilitates excessive odors, flies, or insect pests, or pollutant runoff. The manure storage site shall have a water-tight surface which does not permit seepage or percolation of manure pollutants into the ground. 2. The facility shall be in compliance with the Colorado Guidelines for Feedlot Runoff Containment Plan as approved by the Weld County Health Department in July of 1990. 3. Applicant shall comply with all State Health Department requirements for construction and operation of a dairy. Waste disposal retention and containment facilities shall be reviewed and approved by the Weld County Health Department, and constructed in compliance with state statutes. 4. Waste oil, waste paints, stains, treatments, spent drug containers empty livestock dip containers, anti-freeze, and other associated liquid and solid wastes, shall be stored and removed for final disposal in a manner that protects against surface and groundwater contamination. 5. No permanent disposal of wastes shall be permitted at this site. 6. An I.S.D.S. Evaluation on all existing septic systems will be necessary, prior to issuing the required septic permits on the existing systems. 7. Wood shavings, saw dust, and waste materials shall be handled, stored, and disposed in a manner that controls fugitive dust, blowing debris, and other potential nuisance conditions. 8. Fugitive dust must be controlled on this site. _ AUG 61990 j WP560/dgc t i 'NBI6 Cis. °l;,u.-+ ibssc•ik, MEMORAIIDUM Wsterilk Keith Schuett, PlanningJuly 26, 1990 To DateT Donald Carroll, Administrative Manager, Engineering Dept. COLORADO From i- Site Plan - William Bradley Picker, USR-922 Subject: The only concern I have is regarding the lagoon area. What is the distance of the lagoon from the right-of-way? Will the run-off water be contained, or will it run into the borrow ditch on County right-of-way? v ; / � I( 2 7 1990 I. �1.� DC/mw:prwest cc: Commissioner Kirby Planning Referral File - William Bradley Picker, USR-922 tr"" . -� r Agenda Date: August 21, 1990 Applicant's Name: William Bradley Pickert and Everdina Anna Marie Pickert Location: South of Weld County Road 42 and east of and adjacent to weld County Road 5. Legal Description: Part of the W1/2 of Section 28, T4N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado Type of Operation: Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a livestock confinement operation (1,000 head dairy) . Comments: .12„/✓f�-1 _11-24,L dot / ,,, • Weld County Extension Service 9(.078 Kit • (1 Ed Herrii.e Office of Emergency Management PHONE(303)356-4000,EXT.4400 I 915 10th STREET GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 C. CASE NUMBER USR-922 COLORADO July 24, 1990 TO WHOM 1T MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from William Bradley Picker and Everdina Anna Marie Picker for a Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a livestock confinement operation (1,000 head dairy) . The parcel of land is described as part of the W21 of Section 28, T4N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is south of Weld County Road 42 and east of and adjacent to Weld County Road 5. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by August 7, 1990, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Keith A. Schuett, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it L1- o, does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan far the �� following reasons. a � rLI y 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request G (is/is not) compatible with the interests tf one �J town for the following reasons: 7 3. X We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Signed: Agency: COO So/o FM Date: D Z 5 y6 OC 0783 1 . 4 y DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES T PHONE(303)358-4000,EXT.4400 lg 91510th STREET GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 C. CASE NUMBER USR-922 • COLORADO July 24, 1990 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from William Bradley Picker and Everdina Anna Marie Picker for a Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a livestock confinement operation (1,000 head dairy) . The parcel of land is described as part of the WIx of Section 28, T4N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is south of Weld County Road 42 and east of and adjacent to Weld County Road 5. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by August 7, 1990, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Keith A. Schuett, Current Planner, i£ you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. {* of a Thr n�� 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel thisgrequeet (is/is not) compatible with the interests of oa fit' town for the following reasons: stgj .o 3. We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts eit our interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Please refer o the enclosed letter. T�-�Signed 4,2 Agency: letter. ‘2,(2.21- Date: 340790 or NI Ca p^1 47-it DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES t PHONE(303)356-4000,EXT.4400 I915 10th STREET GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 111 kilt CASE NUMBER USR- 922 COLORADO July 24, 1990 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from William Bradley Picker and Everdina Anna Marie Picker for a Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a livestock confinement operation (1,000 head dairy) . The parcel of land is described as part of the W4 of Section 28, T4N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is south of Weld County Road 42 and east of and adjacent to Weld County Road 5. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by August 7, 1990, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Keith A. Schuett, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed aboNa. oil 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it � .p- Z does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan fdi the c following reasons. _4 -Lai ou _1 s o �I 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request -1—rI (is/is not) compatible with the interests ex tau( r _tiS` I town for the following reasons: 1 '1.— i 3. We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be („----- to you prior to: 5. ,-' PleaTer to the enclosed tter. i CT- �y {/ Signed: L( t„ � Agency:/(17O '- "t°' / / e4 �) Date: 7 2 G -?e ldc., Tho Nib/ Li J a 71-&--/ ,�, Or(0, +y MEMORAnDum Keith Schuett Weld County Planning July 18, 1990 — To Date COLORADO From Environmental Protection Services l�j� q/9c <kite �L Brad Pickert Dairy Farm " subject: _ The Division has reviewed and evaluated the site of the proposed dairy expansion located at 19504 WCR 5. The design as follows appears to be adequate and in compliance with the Colorado Guidelines for Feedlot Runoff Containment. JS522/dgc Enclosures < S;11 f �w? o TRr510 s,\./q, !r Ju 2 1990 •I ___ WEllf CU. �Im,�raur, ;aal�tl�kar ,e j 4 r • . Proratc( I cLoc__O c -"-) ---.,I p -/ _ - . --. _1_F�"v q -1 v��s - -- ----- ---•4- 1 v- O p G s -e Q - a� JP 1_ .Lo N -- U.. 1. 3 ?2_ ... --.. ._._ .• _ - - ; - - . .__ f:0 . �;rri ippa`° .:y . IIIc _ SC` 1 \\. -Z 3 ff ' T-A, s• r o%c S. lope 2- . r fo ao : 4dGa f e c", S' W C•orNti-_ p? ta po rgy , _- I '1 f�� - - - tN\41 Y'g . �., a a, iR_ S ._.____._.- 7 / X 1 7 S - /S 7.2s" oil ' c, x l `7S / Gl, cc) 0 / C 0 . 6 �U s- f 7C. = i 12 s � C� 3C 57 j � � 7 / 37 O • / 3j ,c duo ; 7O / 3 2 7c S, (7 e 3 cI S Y 17 s = L/z ; a-7 5-- 2- 0 . / 151 % -.= is; 7 2 S s% s 1Z s7 � c 5-67 sl s s-, a 74 9 r ek a( (' , 9 / _ ��yy e or- r3. I �T ,• a ( L! orra ' " urra / / errn/0. her. / PropoSer( /ve w ?, 1 \ j Cure. a( 5 1 r ' - Pr cilDoS' a (.1" —'l >Gru • 140 US / Ai "4-4 _ J ---�' '. i -. / -• z ' p � 4./04- co,- r0. I I i -- --- — - - - - - - - �. ______D , - -- -- - _. .— - "- ..1 1 •Q C ej r I- c ( • .... c C` . i , SJ o7 . a �—____ I -t C I Q ' ?ropoSe 1 c(3a�r, : H0UBird_ -__} I _..__. ._._. . __ _. _ _ _ I . -T ._._- i _ -- - - - -1 I I I'I' Carr 0. ( C! urra I 0 0 r r a ( ' ..�.. I I:7J , \\ I I - co 7 I „Z I z I "a; t ` I I- I ____._ j _ _ _I se • P° 11--��` � A• PI n � �nI N ("' "-- N .. w C R .S�.. -- n �� .,#4,,.:....":!::,::::.1....-:".:K.7---„:, C SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS USR-922 WILLIAM AND EVERDINA PICKERT Weld County Land Investors, Inc. c/o Capital Agricultural Production Service c/o Curtis Talley, Jr. P.O. Box 1302 Palisade, CO 81526 Richard J. and Irene Herring 1227 SW 132 Lane, #732 Seattle, WA 98146 Rodney S. and Joyce M. Pfeiff 1554 Weld County Road 40-1/2 Berthoud, CO 80513 Harry R. and Vera Crowe, Sr. 55 Truman Boulevard Oakland, NJ 07436 Ronald R. and Luann Halverson 19619 Weld County Road 5 Berhoud, CO 80513 ," bi f; � DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES �� PHONE(303)356-4000,EXT.4400 lg 915 10th STREET GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 C. COLORADO July 24, 1990 William Bradley Pickert Everdina Anna Marie Pickert 19504 Weld County Road 5 Berthoud, CO 80513 Subject: USR-922 - Request for a Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review permit on a parcel of land described as part of the Wit of Section 28, T4N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado Dear Mr. and Mrs. Pickert: Your application and related materials for the request described above are complete and in order at the present time. I have scheduled a meeting with the Weld County Planning Commission on Tuesday, August 21, 1990, at 1:30 p.m. This meeting will take place in the County Commissioners' Hearing Room, first floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado. It is recommended that you and/or a representative be in attendance to answer any questions the Planning Commission members might have with respect to your application. It is the responsibility of an applicant to see that a sign is posted on the property under consideration at least 10 days preceding the hearing date. Sometime prior to August 8, 1990, you or a representative should call me to obtain a sign to be posted on the site no later than August 11, 1990. The Department of Planning Services' staff will make a recommendation concerning this application to the Weld County Planning Commission. It is the responsibility of the applicant to call the Department of Planning Services' office a few days before the date of the Planning Commission hearing to obtain that recommendation. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to call me. Respectfully, l/l ! rf ith A. Schuett �� Current Planner iLIL 2 1990 USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW APPLICATION uL� Department of Planning Services, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colatif a HO6I1 °`F71Wmw'4th Phone - 356-4000 - Ext. 4400 Case Number nC4-71�� Date Received 2-ac - 7V Application Checked y (/!�, Mylar plat submitted S 7-.24 -40 Application Fee =,p o n Receipt Number 1, taZ Recording Fee Receipt Number ==========acm==e========sax========v.==aavovi=======as=====v=mv®a========== TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT: (please print or type, except for necessary signature) 1- (we) , the undersigned, hereby request a hearing before the Weld County Planning Commission and Weld County Board of County Commissioners concerning the proposed Use by Special Review Permit on the following described unincorporated area of Weld County, Colorado: c LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT AREA: (A1 y Section s7 7 T N, R b W LEGAL DESCRIPTION of contiguous property owned upon which Special Review Permit is proposed: Li; IL, Section 01. 3' T N, R Ice W n Property Address (if available) / 15 B9- l l° L I? 345- Borl li C ‘'C1 1 i { PRESENT ZONE �� 0 4, in, rat I OVERLAY ZONES � n f ,_ , c, , et � TOTAL ACREAGE L/ 7 <t PROPOSED LAND USE Prz ,'r /=q r• p,t EXISTING LAND USE Da i Fq r M SURFACE FEE (PROPERTY OWNERS) OF AREA PROPOSED FOR THE USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT: — - —{-- — — Name: bt. ; N , g M 15 rad it / p, C K P w 1 Address: ) ? b t' t/ W l' a. S CitY ne r r k t v if Zip R-05- -3 Home Telephone # 552 -3 j- 7 L Business Telephone # SCt M r Nam e:L ( (+ rC��Wa alv Alc; ; t. I ; C rie r' t Address: %% Sin d/ to l` R 5- City lie /-t h 0 : d Zip SOS"/-j Home Telephone # Business Telephone # n4 APPLICANT OR AUTHORIZED AGENT (if different than above) : Name: Address: City Zip Home Telephone # Business Telephone # List the owner(s) and/or lessees of mineral rights on or under the subject properties of record. Name: Address: City Zip Name: Address: City Zip I hereby depose and state under the penalties of perjury that all statements, proposals and/or plans submitted with or contained within the application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. COUNTY OF WELD ) STATE OF COLORADO ) �+1/4.1A 0 g,S `IOTAAximr R le :.� Signature: Owner or A horized Agent �`. sos �bg t sworn to before me this lq --day of q�� 19c\c. . 4 91F CV N0TARY PUBLIC OF .C My commission expires My Commission Expires Feb. 13, 1993 (^Q`r ,` AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS SURFACE ESTATE Application No. Subject Property SATE OF COLORADO ) ss. COUNTY OF WELD ) THE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn, states that to the best of his or her knowledge, the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names, addresses, and the corresponding Parcel Identification Number assigned by the Weld County Assessor of the owners of property (the surface estate) within 500 feet of the property which is the subject of the application. This list was compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor, an ownership update from a title or abstract company, derived from such records, or from the records of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. The list compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor shall have been assembled within 30 days of the application submission date. � C.J . r� A U �ZG;?o ' /(1,142. ,.., I O c.I411\9oregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me this ins-day of ��\.,4\ , 1S qo , by LA; \\.oven \,b e 1• WITNESS my hand and official seal. My Commission expires: My COW1111K6NiR EKpilxf 'r;pb, 13, ;99.3 �L11+ �tt mOG Ndtary Public SC:07RI RE : SPECIAL REVIEW PICKERTS DAIRY BERTHOUD, CCLOP.ADO 19504 WCR #f 5 Applicants property is presently being used es a family dairy operation. The dairy facility has been in use for well over twenty years . The present owners have been dairying on the property since January of 1981 . The Bradley Pickert family derive their livihood from the income of a herd of dairy cattle that at present numbers approximately 450 head . We also use the property as our home . We also over the years have been fortunate enough to have had two sons working with us . At this time , as we ask for this special review, find ourselves needing to expand our cattle numbers and our personal use housing facilities to accomadate three sons and their families wishing to be partners in the business . Cur special review request then, is for 1000 head of dairy cattle , the corrals neccesary to hold and feed them,barns when deemed n.ec- cesary to protect them from the weather and or to milk and store produced product . Also their may come a time when we will wish to store all of our feedstuffs under cover or in specially constructed facilities . A separate building will be needed to act as mobile equipment storage and a repair shop. We believe six houses could be needed for family and labor. six total number. Nearly all of the surrounding properties surrounding are used for agricultural production the exceptions being two rural homes within five hundred feet . One of these homes is occupied by P couple whose major source of income is a job in. Denver, however they do raise wheat on their r acres . The other rural home is lo- cated on three acres , presently unoccupied . Cur son 3ob is trying to purchase this property for his residence . A dairy operation of any major size usually is a twenty four hour a day operation, ours would be no different . We will run three daily milking shifts with a labor force possibly growing to twenty people including our families . A variety of vehicles ranging from personal cars and pickup trucks to full sized legel road semi-trailers would serve our dairy using state highway m56 and 'field County road #5 as their basic routes . We would expect at least one milk pickup daily by semi and probably seven to ten feed or service or route supply trucks weekly . The ma- jor exception to this would be heavy local farm truck deliverys during feed harvest seasons . Family housing will use health department acproved septic systems . Cattle manure could be stockpiled for up to six month reri.ds be- fore removal . Cattle feed stockpiles could be on hand for up to nine months. Garbage removal is done by contract and is removed on wee'rly ba.sis .Storm water retention see attached exhibit . ",eater will be supplied by Little Thompson see attached letter . Fire pro- tection see attached exhibit . Garbage removal done by Ginther Trash Masters . or o p- �,S, t.+':9 ,A Their is no special plan for landscaping. We presently have lawns flower borders , trees and the like that are well maintained . Any erosion control is handled as needed . The facility could easily be converted to alternate agricultural uses in the advent that their is no longer a need for dairy farms . Cur time table is ; we are already in operation as future needs and funds occur then expansion will happen. The existing dairy is located on land already owned by applicant . The Weld County Comprehensive Plan specifically designates that the property be developed for agriculture and limited housing, the area surrounding is that, as previously described, the property in question will remain agriculture with a. higher than normal concen- tration of cows per acre . Weld plan also designates ag industry . The dairy operation when operating at full capacity will not develop any unusual or objectionable noises , however if in any case such is not the case , then we will comply with any applicable noise standards . The dairy does not intend to produce any toxic wastes or any other product or by-product that will be injurious to the health , safety or welfare of the inhabitants of the surrounding area or county or the employees or owners of the business . The dairy intends to comply with any plan developed in accordance with the county health depart- ment . See attached exhibit . The area is not located in a flood plain as indicated on the map produced by the national flood insurance program map revised in September 28 , 1982 map panel 725 . Weld County kirport is approxi- mately thirty five miles away . The county soils map shows four soil types located on the prop- erty designated by numbers17 ,61 , 65 and82 these soils described on attached exhibit . SCC :Q1 SPECI.9L USE ADIJEKLUM FICKEHTS DAIRY The Starbird ditch appears to run adjacent tc the East property line . Mr. Louis Bein is the ditch secretary. His office being at FO Box 10'79 Berthoud, Colorado e051? . C07 1 PREPLAN INFORMATION SHEET BERTHOUD FIRE DEPARTMENT DATE PREPARED 6/15/90 NAME OF BUSINESS Pickert Dairy NATURE OF BUSINESS Dairy Production ADDRESS 1(15(14 via rrxim+h 1x3 S OWNER OR MANAGER William Bradley Pickert IN CASE OF EMERGENCY NOTIFY: NAME William Bradley Pickert PHONE 532-3292 NAME Everdina Anna Maria Pickert PHONE 532-3292 NAME William Bradley Pickert Jr. PHONE 532-3880 NAME SCOtt Jallti$ Pirkert PHONE 532-4513 NAME Robert Rrian Pirknrl- PHONE 532-1292 TOTAL NUMBER OF PEOPLE NORMALLY ON PREMISES, DAY 7 + NIGHT 7 + APPROXIMATE SQUARE FT.OF BUILDING 1736 • NUMBER OF EXITS 3 NUMBER OF LEVELS IN BUILDING (COUNTING BASEMENT) 1 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION Rl nrk 1.7 Anna w/a+Pal rnnf IS BUILDING PROTECTED BY A SPRINKLING SYSTEM? NO IF PARTIALLY,WHAT PARTS? MIA DOES BUILDING HAVE AN OUTSIDE FIRE ALARM? No FLAMABLE LIQUIDS (WHAT,NORMAL AMOUNTS,WHERE LOCATED). Farmland Lubricants Indol ISO 68 (45 gal) OTHER HAZARDOUS MATERIALS(WHAT,NORMAL AMOUNT, LOCATION). FS 101 33% Bactercide (solid organic chloranate) FC .520 rhloranatrrl poison (30 971 .1 FC 298 CIP acid clean (15 gal.) corrosive Bouadine Sanitizing (15 gal.) OTHER SPECIAL HAZARDS (GIVE SPECIFIC HAZARD AND LOCATION). Prann 12 (30 Lb.) Attached shed LPG 500 gal. NE corner of building T.A^_PP1u1 Tankc S0' NF of }nii lr7i nrJ LOCATION OF REMOVABLE VALUABLE RECORDS OR PROPERTY. • Livid Nitrogen NE corner of block buildings dice , /,413 ircha S ' (a) Fu a fill , L P 6 ,soo 9A1 N Tax Ics eloek cons-6we,t4,A4 ® CPC, net q frl pow,tat fut. 4wt.t TANK �_ 6 I Z 345 $ / woa0 Fftrew.e S1et.yF 1 7 . a 9 Rai m M i I I< PMdoe. i I I 1,-Eq CAL I 1 I I eOfrtpa,ESSo6S I JAIAC ge,Patttel-A-4-Caea I (Oww.p FA.uw LA,a S Lu B 4410.aµAs I I (ys yp[s, 'CUM! /2 (a /4s) I I 879 FCth I CC► tinte.,4,14 ) ` "04 4:(444,✓S /moo/ B.4.44 s > SC '-23 a _.__ i i iI I SHOW GENERAL LOCATION OF BUILDING IN RELATION TO: i • ; ! 1.Nearby Hazards •• ; i 0 Nearest Hydrants — -- — • , 3.Other sources of water ----- i --' , 4.Heavy Traffic Areas 5.Name ajoining streets -= f Notes to diagrams: • -- -1 - --- — #1 CR 3 + CR40 15 t 500 cram j • -- -- ! - `—"-�— #2 HWY 56 + CR 1 >1000 gpm • i --- . • - i ! - ' -ll '• : _r_____ .. . . • •i -.. -,._.� i• }. .._._ +- - 1I `�'� ; T - _ • Ii - _ - - I --,---I---- -- • -T ...__. ....--.-._.-- - T-+ - ❑❑ O I i • i D3oDm D X GI ' l - _�i -- TDmz m r - -_— { • . Dk. __-_--_ _— f---; ! ----� - __—... > 13 5 C - i 3 N H C i D ° _-- ------t._ _ — — — — �_ _ --- m _! — I _ _ .. _ _� _:._ :__ ._-- cZi o - - - r- . D ,3 7, , • i _____; I: i i . I- • - I- ttt 0 ...' f i 3 , I ; H -�-_ -�•-- ._.-_-�__ .. ._.._L_ .._. __. OOOO 73 r = .•i ZCC N D D m XI H I c'� co r D .. _ m r m r n)Xi 23�_i __. �_ _—...._ m m ai D f7 f7 H m P C = 03 —1 9; O = --- • - O m T � . .---I - .... . - 1- --- ! xi D T 0 mi x 3 co _�- m i m K _.. _ Z H f LITTLE THOMPSON WATER DISTRICT DIRECTORS. Telephone 532-2096 CreacMelomumon June 14, 1990 307 Welch Avenue Drawer G Glenn W.Gibson Berthoud Colorado 60513 Leo Raked Keth Croonouist Tom Reynolds E.Thomas Ricord Dean Anderson MANAGER Richard H.H.Whatet Mr. Brad Pickert 19504 Weld County Road 5 Berthoud, Colorado 80513 Re: Service Commitment Dear Mr. Pickert; In response to your request that we provide you with information as to the possibility of providing additional water service to your dairy at the above address, the following is pertinent: 1. Currently, a 1" meter provides service to the dairy, and we will continue to provide this service in accordance with the Water Service Agreement between the owner and the District. The maximum sustained capacity of this meter is 50 gallons per minute (GPM) . 2 . This 1" meter is supplied by means of a 6" diameter water main located on the south side of Weld county Road 40 1/2 . The main has additional capacity available at this time. 3 . Additional service is possible by means of an additional water tap or enlargement of the existing tap. If you should desire to purchase a larger water tap, we will credit you with the current 1" tap fee as a "trade in" on a larger tap. 4. There are no capacity problems on that 6" line at this time, so any size tap up to 2" is available upon request/payment of necessary fees. Any larger size tap request must be addressed by the District Board of Directors in accordance with District Rules and Regulations. I hope that this has provided you with the information which you desired. If you have questions, or should you need additional information, please contact our office. Best Reg rds, ��\e Barry Operations Supervisor 9C0783 ALTA LOAN POLICE'— Amended 10-17-70 • 1 POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE ISSUED BY d STEWART TITLE t :> ` + .. GUARANTY COMPANY { «I. .9 SUBJECT TO THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE, THE EXCEPTIONS CONTAINED IN SCHEDULE B AND +� ) THE PROVISIONS OF THE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS HEREOF, STEWART TITLE GUARANTY y .. COMPANY, a Texas corporation,herein called the Company,...inauenesof Datenf Policy shown in Schedule A,against loss or damage, not exceeding the amount of insurance statechinfSchedule A„p id costs, attorneys' fees and expenses which the Company may become obligated to pay hereunder,sustainedor incurred by the insured by reason of: ; + 1. Title to the estate or interest described in Schedule A a} . being vestad,dtherwise than as stated therein; d 2. Any defect in or lien or encumbrance on such title ',4`r gal' x� (� };l 3. Lack of a right of access to and from the land % R � 4. Unmarketability of such title; 344$44ue-- m; I� 5. The invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the insured•mortgage upon said estate or interest except to the extent that such invalidity or unenforceabihty, or claim therect,arises out of the transaction evidenced by the Y•;•, insured Mortgage and is based upon /-41 4 + + a. usury,or b. any consumer credit protection or truth in lending I�g`x4-'444"'` 6. The priority of any lien or encumbrance over the lien oftheinsured.mortgage; + , 7. Any statutory lien for labor or material which now has gained or hereafter may gain priority over the lien of the insured mortgage, except any such lien arising from an improvement on the land contracted for and commenced y" subsequent to Date of Policy not financed in whole or in part by proceeds of the indebtedness secured by the ¢^ insured mortgage which at Date of Policy the insured has advanced or is obligated to advance;or 8. The invalidity or unenfomeability of any assignment,shown in Schedule A, of the insured mortgage or the failure C ; of said assignment to vest title to the insured mortgage in the named insured assignee free and clear of all liens. 4•+°p` In witness whereof, Stewart Title Guaranty Company has caused this policy to be signed and sealed by its duly + , authorized officers as of Date of Policy shown in Schedule A. i muter, 'IR STEN ART TITLE d» GUARANTY COMPANY _`ter l.� 71tP-r T� a� \` ".� ' ‘t�*CUg9a_` -9 I: :�. r)huirman of the Board aQ• oP0, President Countersigned. k t*_ set<a +Is ♦ ti sE♦ Ur; 19 8 An �S' ri'A783 �Nn. aID v." Authorized Cow tersignature l �• - = Serial Nip. M 9903• % a3 Li 5 002 50M 5.84 SCHEDULEB PART 1 ORDER NO. : 36610 POLICY NO. : M-9903-208405 THIS POLICY DOES NOT INSURE AGAINST LOSS OR DAMAGE BY REASON OF THE FOLLOWING: 41 , 1 1 . RIGHTS OR CLAIMS OF PARTIES IN POSSESSION NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS . 4 2 . EASEMENTS , OR CLAIMS OF EASEMENTS, NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS . 3 . DISCREPANCIES , CONFLICTS IN BOUNDARY LINES, SHORTAGE IN AREA, ENCROACHMENTS, AND ANY FACTS W IC CORRECT SURVEY AND INSPECTION OF THE PREMISE ; . EPS AND WHICH ARE NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS:' , c,:l s'J 4 . ANY LIEN, OR RIGHT TO A LIE14 0RISERVICES, LABOR, OR MATERIAL THERETOFORE OR HEREAFTER FURNIeflED, IMPOSED BY LAW AND NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIG ,RECORRS = '1s i ';"` 41E 5. Taxes for the year 1985 and subsequet t ears , not yet due and payable . - '' 6 . A Condition contained •ip the United C' tes Patent recorded nkt February 17, 1896 in Book . page lip/wild County Records , • which states as follows. ,ES!fll0eQb4p Ry tvested and accrued water rights for mining, igOlCulturei manufacturing or other purposes , and right to ditches and resservpirs used in connection with such water rights , as pay, be recognized and acknowledged by the local customs , laws po{i decisions of Courts, and also subject to the right of the proprietor of a vein or lode to extract and remove his ore Lherefrcmw . should the same be found to penetrate or intersect thp 'preOlses hereby granted , as provided by Law, and there is.reeeryed from the lands hereby granted, a right of way thereon for ditches or canals constructed by the authority of the United States . " 7 . A Condition contained in the United States Patent recorded October 12 , 1908 in Book 131 at page 226 Weld County Records , which states as follows: "Subject to any vested and accrued water rights for mining, agricultural , 'manufacturing or other purposes , and right to ditches and reservoirs used in connection with such water rights , as may be recognized and acknowledged by the local customs , laws and decisions of Courts, and also subject to the right of the proprietor of a vein or lode to extract and remove his ore therefrom, should the same be found to penetrate or intersect the premises hereby granted , as provided by Law. " (SW1 /2 NW1 /4 ) 8. Rights of way for County Roads 30 feet wide on either side of section and township lines , as established by the Board of Continued on next page 010. .. z STEWART TITS s , ) GUARANTY COMPANY 99C _.._.. _,_.__ . _ _. . ___. 17 16 P. I MI I ZZ 0 Z 0 cc ZONE A 4>4w 1 — w 21 'Plwnops', sot.' Q13 19 20 1 L.<<,e Dirrh Rockwell _____.----"" 2 ___---_--_ / oft,. i -- — jl �,/ I/29 2e / p BAXTER LAKE \s oW D \ I ZONE C go�� tloA \�� 1 5 ' $ . � - -- 0 � Miller • Reservoir a'� 1fJ ZONE A _ __JI 32 �_— 33 31 r_--_� � � , .,4 / 17 V . 4 NEWELL ,rr,t -le �Y]i�p• u ". rw: 6 az 1 $ a' r't ' z �r -- d� `i r:l`• 1s -- � , a •, aq 921 ,+mac .ar-` 15 - „+ ,,tgt �^` z S a r R� I `4i - : D _< 42 -R4.,,>�l I+e, , r--- r 42 a. "":,. .. i4NNf.n" " . ..., i 'ter ' :: 15 17 -. s, 4. 15 16 • ti 61 19 . 20 az $ �* ' 53 SI w RJV � 53 '4r. . .iIII ... 79 _ s# •� - .k t - -r: ..17G• a sz 8 tsi " -.. 1 -. ._ + $.85•. .,* " ;� d 3 A `c",..'' E, �' 26E' ,cyy-x y3. i V 62 fi a% l r� -4� . i R it. 3AXTE 4— F1104, 1 2h ®� � � LAKE J •ira r} .1:4,-C- +i.e°"e .-_ J"ka r— . ii-7))1fr 17 I Alf '{ c .. dl2 '1�, 1 _- t"t ItF _ 65..may s Y. p 5 b iii A �,7 f • ,y9d '�" ^y� w ` Sr ... _�t `,pia'... ♦� L`^.:. S.. I.Ff� fi p 60" ti a. 34 a ;f .tV I s: +#t^' 65 T r \ `• _ a i 4�+ftw,..4, (i rhr*Y r #+ •-'r. �3�4 �J/ _Fst_ w+ .Y a 1141 '',�. F ++ t + t. _1 3 :A -/ - i• w c KaC Y_ _'"--4....4. �. +t .-, YV y � T ` yp 44 r"-1 I nrv.83 �, _ -_,ti�.�'..♦ ' s.. ^M`� r .•:' *�y�- �,.. .� ye'�,..::I �.7 �y-"sr :.g.<'.. _ WE COUNTY, COLORADO, SOUTHERN PART 15 rigating close grown crops and pasture. Furrows, contour of 4,850 to 5,050 feet. It formed in calcareous eolian furrows, and cross slope furrows are suitable for row deposits. Included in mapping are small areas of soils that crops. Sprinkler irrigation is also desirable. Keeping til- have fine sandy loam or loam underlying material and lage to a minimum and utilizing crop residue help to con- small areas of soils that are shallow to moderately deep trol erosion. Maintaining fertility is important. Crops over shale and sandstone. respond to applications of phosphorus and nitrogen. Typically the surface layer of this Colby soil is pale In nonirrigated areas this soil is suited to winter wheat. brown loam about 7 inches thick. The underlying material The predicted average yield is 28 bushels per acre. The is very pale brown silt loam to a depth of 60 inches. soil is summer fallowed in alternate years to allow Permeability is moderate. Available water capacity is moisture accumulation. Generally precipitation is too low high. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. for beneficial use of fertilizer. Surface runoff is rapid, and the erosion hazard is high. Stubble mulch farming, striperopping, and minimum til- This soil is suited to limited cropping. Intensive lage are needed to control soil blowing and water erosion. cropping is hazardous because of erosion. The cropping Terracing also may be needed to control water erosion system should be limited to close grown crops, such as al- The potential native vegetation is dominated by blue falfa, wheat, and barley. This soil also is suited to ir- grama. Several mid grasses, such as western wheatgrass rigated pasture. A suitable cropping system is 3 to 4 and needleandthread, are also present. Potential produc- years of alfalfa followed by 2 years of corn and small tion ranges from 1,600 pounds per acre in favorable years grain and alfalfa seeded with a nurse crop. to 1,000 pounds in unfavorable years. As range condition Close grown crops can be irrigated from closely spaced deteriorates, the mid grasses decrease; blue grams, buf- contour ditches or sprinklers. Contour furrows or sprin- falograss, snakeweed, yucca, and fringed sage increase; klers should be used for new crops. Applications of and forage production drops. Undesirable weeds and an- nitrogen and phosphorus help in maintaining good produc- nuals invade the site as range condition becomes poorer. Lion. Management of vegetation on this soil should be based The potential native vegetation is dominated by blue on taking half and leaving half of the total annual produc- grama. Sideoats grama, little bluestem, western wheat- tion. Seeding is desirable if the range is in poor condition. grass, and sedge are also prominent. Potential production Sideoats grama, little bluestem, western wheatgrass, blue ranges from 1,800 pounds per acre in favorable years to grama, pubescent wheatgrass, and crested wheatgrass are 1,500 pounds in unfavorable years. As range condition suitable for seeding. The grass selected should meet the deteriorates, the sideoats grama and little bluestem seasonal requirements of livestock. It can be seeded into decrease, forage production drops, and blue grama, buf- a clean, firm sorghum stubble, or it can be drilled into a falograss, and several perennial forbs and shrubs in- firm prepared seedbed. Seeding early in spring has crease. Undesirable weeds and annuals invade the site as proven most successful. range condition becomes poorer. Windbreaks and environmental plantings of trees and Management should be based on taking half and leaving shrubs commonly grown in the area are generally well half of the total annual production. Seeding is desirable if suited to this soil. Cultivation to control competing the range is in poor condition. Sideoats grama, little - vegetation should be continued for as many years as bluestem, western wheatgrass, and pubescent wheatgrass possible following planting. Trees that are best suited and are suitable for seeding. The grass selected should meet have good survival are Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern the seasonal needs of livestock. It can be seeded into a redcedar, ponderosa pine, Siberian elm, Russian-olive, and clean, firm sorghum stubble, or it can be drilled into a hackberry. The shrubs best suited are skunkbush sumac, firm prepared seedbed. Plowing and drilling should be on lilac, Siberian peashrub, and American plum. the contour to minimize runoff and soil losses. Seeding Openland wildlife, such as pheasant, mourning dove, early in spring has proven most successfuL and cottontail, and rangeland wildlife, such as antelope, Windbreaks and environmental plantings of trees and cottontail, and coyote, are best suited to this soil. Under shrubs commonly grown in the area are generally well irrigation, good wildlife habitat can be established, suited to this soil Cultivation to control competing benefiting many kinds of openland wildlife. Forage vegetation should be continued for as many years as production is typically low on rangeland, and grazing possible following planting. Trees that are best suited and management is needed if livestock and wildlife share the have good survival are Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern range. Livestock watering facilities also are utilized by redcedar, ponderosa pine, Siberian elm, Russian-olive, and various wildlife species. hackberry. The shrubs best suited are skunkbush sumac, This soil has good potential for urban and recreational lilac, Siberian peashrub, and American plum. developments. Read design can be modified to compen- Openland wildlife, such as pheasant, mourning dove, sate for the limited capacity of this soil to support a load. and cottontail, and rangeland wildlife, such as antelope, Capability subclass IIIe irrigated, IVe nonirrigated; cottontail, and coyote, are best suited to this soiL Under Loamy Plains range site. irrigation, good wildlife habitat can be established, X 17—Colby loam, 5 to 9 percent slopes. This is a deep, benefiting many kinds of openland wildlife. Forage well drained soil on upland hills and ridges at elevations production is typically low on rangeland, and grazing All 16 SOIL SURVEY management is needed if livestock and wildlife share the ments of livestock. It can be seeded into a clean, firm range. Livestock watering facilities also are utilized by sorghum stubble, or it can be drilled into a firm prepared various wildlife species. seedbed. Plowing and drilling should be on the contour to This soil has good potential for urban and recreational minimize runoff and soil losses. Seeding early in spring developments. Road design can be modified to compen- has proven most successsful. Capability subclass IVe sate for the limited capacity of this soil to support a load. nonirrigated; Colby soil in Loamy Slopes range site, Capability subclass IVe irrigated, VIe nonirrigated; Adena soil in Loamy Plains range site. Loamy Slopes range site. 19—Colombo clay loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes. This is 18—Colby-Adena loams, 3 to 9 percent slopes. These a deep, well drained soil on flood plains and terraces at gently sloping to moderately sloping soils are on plains, elevations of 4,600 to 4,780 feet. It formed in stratified hills, and ridges at elevations of 4,750 to 4,900 feet. The calcareous alluvium. Included in mapping are small areas Colby soil, which makes up about 55 percent of the map of soils that have a loam surface layer and some small unit, occupies the steeper, convex parts of the landscape. leveled areas. The Adena soil, about 30 percent of the unit, occupies the Typically the surface layer of this Colombo soil is dark less steep, slightly concave parts. About 15 percent is grayish brown clay loam about 14 inches thick. The upper Kim loam and Weld loam. 7 inches of the underlying material is pale brown The Colby soil is deep and well drained. It formed in stratified clay loam and loam. The lower part to a depth calcareous eolian deposits. Typically the surface layer is of 60 inches is very pale brown loam stratified with thin pale brown loam about 7 inches thick. The underlying lenses of fine sand, medium sand, and clay loam. material to a depth of 60 inches is very pale brown silt Permeability is moderate. Available water capacity is loam. high. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Permeability is moderate. Available water capacity is Surface runoff is slow, and the erosion hazard is low. high. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. In irrigated areas this soil is suited to crops commonly- Surface runoff is rapid, and the erosion hazard is high. grown in the area, such as corn, sugar beets, beans, alfal- The Adena soil also is deep and well drained and fa, onions, and potatoes. formed in calcareous eolian deposits. Typically the surface All methods of irrigation that are common to the area layer is brown loam about 6 inches thick. The subsoil is are used. Borders are suitable for small grain, alfalfa, and brown and very pale brown clay loam about 3 inches pasture. Furrow irrigation is used for row crops. Crops thick. The substratum to a depth of 60 inches is very pale respond to application of nitrogen and phosphorus. brown silt loam. Windbreaks and environmental plantings of trees and Permeability is slow. Available water capacity is high. shrubs commonly grown in the area are generally well The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Surface suited to this soil. Cultivation to control competing runoff is medium, and the erosion hazard is moderate. vegetation should be continued for as many years as This unit is used for nonirrigated cropland and range- possible following planting. Trees that are best suited and land. It is suited to winter wheat, barley, and sorghum. have good survival are Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern Most of the acreage is planted to winter wheat and is redcedar, ponderosa pine, Siberian elm, Russian-olive, and summer fallowed in alternate years to allow moisture ac- hackberry. The shrubs best suited are skunkbush sumac, cumulation. Generally precipitation is too low for benefi- lilac, Siberian peashrub, and American plum. cial use of fertilizer. Wildlife is an important secondary use of this soil. Stubble mulch farming, striperopping, and minimum til- Ring-necked pheasant, mourning dove, and many non- lage are needed to control soil blowing and water erosion. game species can be attracted by establishing areas for Terracing also may be needed to control water erosion. nesting and escape cover. For pheasants, undisturbed The potential native vegetation on this unit is nesting cover is essential and should be included in plans dominated by blue grama. Sideoats grama, little bluestem, for habitat development, especially in areas of intensive and western wheatgrass are also prominent. Potential agriculture. production ranges from 1,800 pounds per acre in favora= Where this soil is on flood plains and is susceptible to ble years to 1,100 pounds in unfavorable years. As range flooding it has poor potential for urban and recreational condition deteriorates, the sideoats grama and little development. On the higher terraces the potential is fair. bluestem decrease, forage production drops, and blue Dwelling and road designs need to be modified to in- grama, buffalograss, and- several perennial forbs and crease the capacity of the soil to support a load and to shrubs increase. Undesirable weeds and annuals invade protect it against frost action. Capability subclass IIw ir- the site as range condition becomes poorer. rigated. Management should be based an taking half and leaving 20—Colombo clay loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes. This is half of the total annual production. Seeding is desirable if a deep, well drained soil on flood plains and terraces at the range is in poor condition. Sideoats grama, little elevations of 4,600 and 4,780 feet. It formed in stratified bluestem, western wheatgrass, bluegrama, pubescent calcareous alluvium. Included in mapping are small areas wheatgrass, and crested wheatgrass are suitable for seed- of soils that have a .loam surface layer. Some small ing. The grass selected should meet the seasonal require- leveled areas are also included. �. _ b, .-.` 4.0r 40 SOIL SURVEY from 800 pounds per acre in favorable years to 500 production ranges from 1,750 pounds per acre in favora- pounds in unfavorable years. As range condition deteri- ble years to 950 pounds in unfavorable years. As range orates, the mid grasses decrease and forage production condition deteriorates, the sideoats grama, little bluestem. drops. Undesirable weeds and annuals invade the site as and sand reedgrass decrease; yucca, sedge, and blue range condition becomes poorer. grama increase; and forage production drops. Management of vegetation on the Shingle soil should be Management of vegetation should be based on taking based on taking half and leaving half of the total annual half or less of the total annual production. Deferred graz- production. Seeding is desirable if the range is in poor ing is practical in improving range condition. Seeding and condition. Western wheatgrass, blue grama, alkali sacaton, mechanical treatment are impractical. sideoats grama, little bluestem, pubescent wheatgrass, Windbreaks and environmental plantings are generally and crested wheatgrass are suitable for seeding. The not suited to this soil. Onsite investigation is needed to grass selected should meet the seasonal requirements of determine if plantings are feasible. livestock. It can be seeded into a clean, firm sorghum Production of vegetation on this treeless soil is low. stubble, or it can be drilled into a firm prepared seedbed. especially during drought, when annual production can be Seeding early in spring has proven most successfuL as low as 300 pounds per acre. Rangeland wildlife, such as The potential native vegetation on the Renohill soil is antelope and scaled quail, can be attracted by managing dominated by western wheatgrass and blue grama. Buf- livestock grazing, installing livestock watering facilities. falograss is also presented. Potential production ranges and reseeding where needed. This soil has poor potential for urban development. The from 1,000 pounds per acre in favorable years to 600 chief ]inviting feature is the shallow depth to sandstone. pounds in unfavorable years. As range condition deteri- orates, a blue grama-buffalos sod forms. Undesirable Capability subclass VIe irrigated, VIe nonirrigated; Sand- weeds and annuals invade the site as range condition stone Breaks range site. becomes poorer. 62—Terry fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes. This Management of vegetation on the Renohill soil should is a moderately deep, well drained soil on plains at eleva- be based on taking half and leaving half of the total an-, tions of 4,500 to 5,000 feet. It formed in residuum from nual production. Range pitting can reduce runoff. Seeding sandstone. Included in mapping are small areas of soils that have sandstone deeper than 40 inches. Also included is desirable if the range is in poor condition. Western wheatgrass, blue grama, sideoats grams, buffalograss, pu- are smallare er of soils that have a subsoil of sandy clay bescent wheatgrass, and crested wheatgrass are suitable loam and clay loam. for seeding. The grass selected should meet the seasonal Typically the surface layer of this Terry soil is pale brown requirements of livestock. It can be seeded into a clean fine sandy loam about 6 inches thick. The subsoil is firm sorghum stubble, or it can be drilled into a firm pale brown fine sandy loam about 21 inches thick. The prepared seedbed. Seeding early in spring has proven substratum is very pale brown fine sandy loam. Sand- most successful. stone is at a depth of about 37 inches. Rangeland wildlife, such as antelope, cottontail, and Permeability is moderately rapid. Available water capacity is moderate. The effective rooting depth is 20 to coyote, are best suited to this unit. Because forage production is typically low, 40 inches. Surface runoff is slow, and the erosion hazard grazing management is needed is low. if livestock and wildlife share the range. Livestock water- This soil is suited to most of the irrigated crops com- ing facilities also are utilized by various wildlife species. monl Capability subclass VIe irrigated, VIe nonirrigated; Shin- y grown 'n the area. The moderate depth restricts some crops. A suitable cropping system is corn, corn for gle soil in Shaly Plains range site, Renohill soil in Clayey Plains range site. silage, barley, 3 to 4 years of alfalfa and wheat. This soil 61—Tassel fine sand loam, 5 to 20 is also well suited to irrigated pasture. Y percent slopes. Furrows or sprinklers can be used in irrigating row This is a shallow, well drained soil on upland breaks at crops. Flooding from contour ditches and sprinkling are elevations of 4,850 to 5,200 feet. It formed in residuum suitable in irrigating close grown crops and pasture. Small from sandstone. Included in mapping are small areas of heads of water and short runs reduce the risk of erosion. sandstone outcrop and areas of noncalcareous soils. Production can be maintained by frequent irrigations and Typically the surface layer of this Tassel soil is light by applications of barnyard manure and commercial fertil- yellowish brown fine sandy loam about 7 inches thick. The izer. Keeping tillage to a minimum and utilizing crop underlying material is light yellowish brown very fine residue are important. sandy loam. Sandstone is at a depth of about 11 inches. In nonirrigated areas this soil is suited to winter wheat, Permeability is moderately rapid. Available water barley, and sorghum. Most of the acreage is planted to capacity is low. The effective rooting depth is 10 to 20 winter wheat. The predicted average yield is 25 bushels inches. Surface runoff is medium, and the erosion hazard per acre. The soil is summer fallowed in alternate years is moderate. to allow moisture accumulation. Generall The potential native vegetation is dominated by too low for beneficial use of fertilizer. Y precipitation is sideoats grama, little bluestem, blue grama, threadleaf Stubble mulch farming, striperopping, and minimum til- sedge, sand reedgrass, and needleandthread. Potential lage are needed to control soil blowing and water erosion. 0 .-h,•, ey a, ,- id ,% jr,p 42 SOIL SURVEY Typically the surface layer is brown loam about 8 The underlying shale is the most limiting feature of inches thick. The underlying material is pale brown and this soil. Neither septic tank absorption fields nor sewage very pale brown loam. Shale is at a depth of about 28 lagoons function properly. In places the underlying shale inches. has high shrink-swell potential. Environmental and beau- Permeability and available water capacity are tification plantings of trees and shrubs can be difficult to moderate. The effective rooting depth is 20 to 40 inches. establish. Capability subclass IVs irrigated; IVe nonir- Surface runoff is medium, and the erosion hazard is low. rigated; Loamy Plains range site. This soil is suited to limited cropping. A suitable S...65—Thedalund loam, 3 to 9 percent slopes. This is a. cropping system is 3 to 4 years,of alfalfa followed by 2 moderately deep, well drained soil on plains at elevations years of corn and small grain and alfalfa seeded with a of 4,900 to 5,250 feet. It formed in residuum from shale. nurse crop. Incorporating plant residue and manure im- Included in mapping are small areas of soils that have proves tilth and provides organic matter and plant shale and sandstone deeper than 40 inches. Some small nutrients. outcrops of shale and sandstone are also included. Most irrigation methods are suitable, but the length of Typically the surface layer of this Thedalund soil is runs should be short to prevent overirrigation. Light, brown loam about 8 inches thick. The underlying material frequent irrigations are best. Sprinkler irrigation is is pale brown and very pale brown loam. Shale is at a desirable. Commercial fertilizers increase yields and add depth of about 25 inches. to the value of the forage produced. Permeability and available water capacity are In nonirrigated areas this soil is suited to winter wheat, moderate. The effective rooting depth is 20 to 40 inches. barley, and sorghum. Most of the acreage is planted to Surface runoff is medium to rapid, and the erosion hazard winter wheat. The predicted average yield is 25 bushels is moderate* per acre. The soil is summer fallowed in alternate years This soil is suited to limited cropping. Intensive to allow moisture accumulation. Generally precipitation is cropping is hazardous because of erosion. The cropping too low for beneficial use of fertilizer. system should be limited to such close grown crops as al- Stubble mulch farming, striperopping, and minimum til- rigated pasture. A suitable cropping system is 3 to 4 falfa wheat, and barley. The soil is also suited to ir- lage are needed to control soil blowing and water erosion. years of alfalfa followed by 2 years of corn and small Terracing also may be needed to control water erosion. The potential native vegetation is dominated by blue grain and alfalfa seeded with a nurse crop. Closely spaced contour ditches or sprinklers can be grams. Several mid grasses, such as western wheatgrass and needleandthread, are also present. Potential produc- used in irrigating close grown crops. Contour furrows or tion ranges from 1,600 pounds per acre in favorable years sprinklers should be used for new crops. Application of commercial fertilizer helps in maintaining good produc- to 1,000 pounds in unfavorable years. As range condition n. deteriorates, the mid grasses decrease; blue grama, buf- ti T falograss, snakeweed, yucca, and fringed sage increase; The potential native vegetation is dominated blue and forage production drops. Undesirable weeds and an- grams Several mid grasses, such western wheatgrass and needleandthread, are also present. Potential produc- nuals invade the site as range condition becomes poorer. tion ranges from 1,600 pounds per acre in favorable years Management of vegetation on this soil should be based to 1,000 pounds in unfavorable years. As range condition on taking half and leaving half of the total annual produc- deteriorates, the mid grasses decrease; blue grama, buf- tion. Seeding is desirable if the range is in poor condition. falograss, snakeweed, yucca, and fringed sage increase; Sideoats grams, little bluestem, western wheatgrass, blue and forage production drops. Undesirable weeds and an- grama, pubescent wheatgrass, and crested wheatgrass are nuals invade the site as range condition becomes poorer. suitable for seeding. The grass selected should meet the Management of vegetation on this soil should be based seasonal requirements of livestock. It can be seeded into on taking half and leaving half of the total annual produc- a clean, firm sorghum stubble, or it can be drilled into a tion. Seeding is desirable if the range is in poor condition. firm prepared seedbed. Seeding early in spring has Sideoats grama, little bluestem, western wheatgrass, blue proven most successful. grama, pubescent wheatgrass, and crested wheatgrass are Windbreaks and environmental plantings are generally suitable for seeding. The grass selected should meet the not suited to this soil. Onsite investigation is needed to seasonal requirements of livestock. It can be seeded into determine if plantings are feasible. a clean, firm sorghum stubble, or it can be drilled into a Rangeland wildlife, such as antelope, cottontail, and firm prepared seedbed. Seeding early in spring has coyote, are best suited to this soil Because forage produc- proven most successfuL tion is typically low, grazing management is needed if Windbreaks and environmental plantings are generally livestock and wildlife share the range. Livestock watering not suited to this soiL Onsite investigation is needed to facilities also are utilized by various wildlife species. The determine if plantings are feasible. cropland areas provide favorable habitat for pheasant and Rangeland wildlife, such as antelope, cottontail, and mourning dove. Many nongame species can be attracted coyote, are best suited to this soil Because forage produc- by establishing areas for nesting and escape cover. tion is typically low, grazing management is needed if Ek° 6G1en.•„ WE:..D COUNTY, COLORADO, SOUTHERN PART 43 livestock and wildlife share the range. Livestock watering ing. The grass selected should meet the seasonal require- facilities also are utilized by various wildlife species. The ments of livestock. It can be seeded into a clean, firm cropland areas provide favorable habitat for pheasant and sorghum stubble, or it can be drilled into a firm prepared mourning dove. Many nongame species can be attracted seedbed. Seeding early in spring has proven most success- by establishing areas for nesting and escape cover. ful. The underlying shale is the most limiting feature of Windbreaks and environmental plantings of trees and this soil. Neither septic tank absorption fields nor sewage shrubs commmonly grown in the area are generally well lagoons function properly. In places the underlying shale suited to this soiL Cultivation to control competing has high shrink-swell potential. Environmental and beau- vegetation should be continued for as many years as tifieation plantings of trees and shrubs can be difficult to possible following planting. Trees that are best suited and establish. Capability subclass IVe irrigated, Vie north-- have good survival are Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern rigated; Loamy Plains range site. redcedar, ponderosa pine, Siberian elm, Russian-olive, and 66—Ulm clay loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes. This is a_ hackberry. The shrubs best suited are skunkbush sumac, deep, well drained soil on plains at elevations of 5,075 to lilac, Siberian peashrub, and American plum. 5,200 feet. It formed in alluvial and eolian sediments from Wildlife is an important secondary use of this soil. The shale. Included in mapping are small areas of soils that cropland areas provide favorable habitat for ring-necked have shale between 40 and 60 inches. Also included are pheasant and mourning dove. Many nongame species can small areas of soils where the surface layer and subsoil be attracted by establishing areas for nesting and escape have been recharged with lime from irrigation. cover. For pheasants, undisturbed nesting cover is essen- Typically the surface layer of this Ulm soil is brown tial and should be included in plans for habitat develop- clay loam about 5 inches thick. The subsoil is brown and ment, especially in areas of intensive agriculture. Range- pale brown clay about 14 inches thick. The substratum to land wildlife, for example, the pronghorn antelope, can be a depth of 60 inches is clay and clay loam. attracted by developing livestock watering facilities, Permeability is slow. Available water capacity is high. managing livestock grazing, and reseeding where needed. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Surface This soil has poor potential for urban and recreational runoff is medium, and the erosion hazard is low. development. Slow permeability and high shrink swell In irrigated areas this soil is suited to all crops com- cause problems in dwelling and road construction. Capa- monly grown in the area, including corn, sugar beets,, bility subclass IIe irrigated, IVe nonirrigated; Clayey beans, alfalfa, and small grain. An example of a suitable Plains range site. cropping system is 3 to 4 years of alfalfa followed by 67—Ulm clay loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes. This is a corn, corn for silage, sugar beets, small grain, or beans. deep, well drained soil on plains at elevations of 5,075 to Land leveling, ditch lining, and installing pipelines are 5,200 feet. It formed in alluvial and eolian sediments from needed for proper water applications. shale. Included in mapping are small areas of soils that All methods of irrigation are suitable, but furrow ir- have shale between depths of 40 and 60 inches. Also in- rigation is the most common. Barnyard manure and com- eluded are small areas of soils where the surface layer mereial fertilizer are needed for top yields. and subsoil have been recharged with lime from irriga- In nonirrigated areas this soil is suited to winter wheat, tion barley, and sorghum. Most of the acreage is planted to Typically the surface of this Ulm soil is brown clay winter wheat. The predicted average yield is 28 bushels loam about 5 inches thick. The subsoil is brown and pale per acre. The soil is summer Mowed in alternate years brown clay about 12 inches thick. The substratum to a to allow moisture accumulation. Generally precipitation is depth of 60 inches is clay and clay loam. too low for beneficial use of fertilizer. Permeability is slow. Available water capacity is high. Stubble mulch farming, striperopping, and minimum til- The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Surface lage are needed to control soil blowing and water erosion. runoff is medium, and the erosion hazard is moderate. Terracing also may be needed to control water erosion. In irrigated areas this soil is suited to the craps com- The potential native vegetation is dominated by monly grown in the area. Perennial grasses and alfalfa or western wheatgrass and blue grama. Buffalograss is also close grown crops should be grown at least 50 percent of present. Potential production ranges from 1,000 pounds the time. Contour ditches and corrugations can be used in per acre in favorable years to 600 pounds in unfavorable irrigating close grown crops and pasture. Furrows, con- years. As range condition deteriorates, a blue grama-buf- tour furrows, and cross slope furrows are suitable for row falograss sod forms. Undesirable weeds and annuals in- crops. Sprinkler irrigation is also desirable. Keeping til- vade the site as range condition becomes poorer. lage to a minimum and utilizing crop residue help to con- Management of vegetation on this soil should be based trol erosion. Maintaining fertility is important. Crops on taking half and leaving half of the total annual produc- respond to applications of phosphorus and nitrogen. tion. Range pitting can reduce runoff. Seeding is desirable In nonirrigated areas this soil is suited to winter wheat, if the range is in poor condition. Western wheatgrass, barley, and sorghum. Most of the acreage is planted to blue grama, sideoats grama, buffalograss, pubescent winter wheat. The predicted average yield is 28 bushels wheatgrass, and crested wheatgrass are suitable for seed- per acre. The soil is summer followed in alternate years OK" t 7.P... 50 SOIL SURVEY sugar beets, small grain, or beans. Few conservation prac- The potential native vegetation is dominated by blue tices are needed to maintain top yields. grama. Several mid grasses, such as western wheatgrass All methods of irrigation are suitable, but furrow ir- and needleandthread, are also present. Potential produc- rigation is the most common. Barnyard manure and com- tion ranges from 1,600 pounds per acre in favorable years mercial fertilizer are needed for top yields. to 1,000 pounds in unfavorable years. As range condition Windbreaks and environmental plantings generally are deteriorates, the mid grasses decrease; blue grama, buf- well suited to this soil. Summer fallow a year before falograss, snakeweed, yucca, and fringed sage increase; planting and continued cultivation for weed control are and forage production drops. Undesirable weeds and an- needed to insure establishment and survival of plantings. nuals invade the site as range condition becomes poorer. Trees that are best suited and have good survival are Management of vegetation on this soil should be based Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern redcedar, ponderosa on taking half and leaving half of the total annual produc- pine, Siberian elm, Russian-olive, and hackberry. The tion. Seeding is desirable if the range is in poor condition. shrubs best suited are skunkbush sumac, lilac, Siberian Sideoats grama, little bluestem, western wheatgrass, blue peashrub, and American plum. grama, pubescent wheatgrass, and crested wheatgrass are Openland wildlife, such as pheasant, mourning dove, suitable for seeding. The grass selected should meet the and cottontail, are best suited to this soil. Wildlife habitat seasonal requirements of livestock. It can be seeded into development, including tree and shrub plantings and a clean, firm sorghum stubble, or it can be drilled into a grass plantings to serve as nesting areas, should be sue- firm prepared seedbed. Seeding early in spring has cessful without irrigation in most years. Under irrigation, proven most successfuL good wildlife habitat can be established, benefiting many Windbreaks and environmental plantings are generally kinds of openland wildlife. well suited to this soil. Summer fallow a year before This soil has good potential for urban and recreational planting and continued cultivation for weed control are development. The chief limiting soil features for urban needed to insure establishment and survival of plantings. development are the shrink-swell potential of the subsoil Trees that are best suited and have good survival are as it wets and dries and the limited capacity of the soil to Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern redcedar, ponderosa support a load. Lawns, shrubs, and trees grow well. Capa- pine, Siberian elm, Russian-olive, and hackberry. The bility class I irrigated. shrubs best suited are skunkbush sumac, lilac, Siberian 79—Weld loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes. This is a deep, peashrub, and American plum. well drained soil on smooth plains at elevations of 4,850 to Openland wildlife, such as pheasant, mourning dove, 5,000 feet. It formed in eolian deposits. Included in and cottontail, are best suited to this soil. Wildlife habitat mapping are small areas of soils that have a subsoil of development, including tree and shrub plantings and loam and light clay loam. Also included are some leveled grass plantings to serve as nesting areas, should be suc- areas. cessful without irrigation during most years. Under ir- Typically the surface layer of this Weld soil is brown rigation, good wildlife habitat can be established, benefit- loam about 8 inches thick. The subsoil is brown and pale ing many kinds of openland wildlife. brown heavy clay loam and light clay about 20 inches This soil has good potential for urban and recreational thick. The substratum to a depth of 60 inches is silt loam. development. The chief limiting soil features for urban Permeability is slow. Available water capacity is high. development are the shrink-swell potential of the subsoil The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Surface as it wets and dries and the limited capacity of the soil to runoff is slow, and the erosion hazard is low. support a load. Lawns, shrubs, and trees grow well. Cape- In irrigated areas this soil is suited to all crops com- bility subclass Ile irrigated, IIIc nonirrigated; Loamy monly grown in the area, including corn, sugar beets (fig. Plains range site. 8), beans, alfalfa, small grain, and onions. An example of a 80—Weld loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes. This is a deep, suitable cropping system is 3 to 4 years of alfalfa fol- well drained soil on plains at elevations of 4,850 to 5,000 lowed by corn, corn for silage, sugar beets, small grain, or feet. It formed in eolian deposits. Included in mapping are beans. Land leveling, ditch lining, and installing pipelines small areas of soils that have a subsoil of loam and light are needed for proper water applications. clay loam All methods of irrigation are suitable, but furrow ir- Typically the surface layer is brown loam about 8 rigation is the most common. Barnyard manure and com- inches thick. The subsoil is brown and pale brown heavy mercial fertilizer are needed for top yields. clay loam and light clay about 18 inches thick. The sub- This soil is well suited to winter wheat, barley, and stratum to a depth of 60 inches is silt loam. sorghum if it is summer fallowed in alternate years. Permeability is slow. Available water capacity is high. Winter wheat is the principal crop. The predicted average The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Surface yield is 33 bushels per acre. If the crop is winterkilled, runoff is medium, and the erosion hazard is moderate. spring wheat can be seeded. Generally precipitation is too In irrigated areas this soil is suited to most of the crops low for beneficial use of fertilizer. commonly grown in the area, such as corn, alfalfa, wheat, Stubble mulch farming, striperopping, and minimum til- and barley. Sugar beets are often grown. The soil is lage are needed to control soil blowing and water erosion. suited to irrigated pasture. Ditch lining and installing Terracing also may be needed to control water erosion. pipelines are needed for proper water application. /2" 52 SOIL SURVEY the limited capacity of this soil to support a load. Capa- Management of vegetation on this soil should be base( bility class I irrigated. on taking half and leaving half of the total annual produc 82—Wiley-Colby complex, 1 to 3 percent slopes. This tion. Seeding is desirable if the range is in poor condition Xnearly level map unit is on smooth plains in the western Sideoats grama, little bluestem, western wheatgrass, blu part of the survey area at elevations of 4,850 to 5,000 grama, pubescent wheatgrass, and crested wheatgrass ar feet. The Wiley soil makes up about 60 percent of the suitable for seeding. The grass selected should meet th unit, and the Colby soil about 30 percent. About 10 per- seasonal requirements of livestock. It can be seeded int cent is Heldt silty clay and Weld loam. a clean, firm sorghum stubble or it can be drilled into The Wiley soil is deep and well drained. It formed in firm prepared seedbed. Seeding early in spring In- calcareous eolian deposits. Typically the surface layer is proven most successful. pale brown silt loam about 11 inches thick. The subsoil is Windbreaks and environmental plantings are general: pale brown silty clay loam about 23 inches thick. The sub- well suited to these soils. Cultivation to control competir stratum to a depth of 60 inches is very pale brown silty vegetation should be continued for as many years clay loam. possible following planting. Trees that are best suited at Permeability is moderately slow. Available water have good survival are Rocky Mountain juniper, easte capacity is high. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches redcedar, ponderosa pine, Siberian elm, Russian-olive, a: or more. Surface runoff is medium, and the erosion hackberry. The shrubs best suited are skunkbush sums hazard is moderate. lilac, Siberian peashrub, and American plum. The Colby soil also is deep and well drained and formed Openland wildlife, such as pheasant, mourning dog in calcareous eolian deposits. Typically the surface layer and cottontail are best suited to these soils. Wildl: is pale brown loam about 7 inches thick. The underlying habitat development, including tree and shrub plantin material is very pale brown silt loam to a depth of 60 and grass plantings to serve as nesting areas, should inches. successful without irrigation during most years. Under Permeability is moderate. Available water capacity is rigation, good wildlife habitat can be established, benei high. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. ing many kinds of openland wildlife. Surface runoff is medium, and the erosion hazard is The Wiley soil has only fair potential for urban a moderate. recreational development. Slow permeability, moder: This map unit is used for irrigated and nonirrigated shrink-swell potential, and limited bearing capacity cat cropland and for rangeland, wildlife habitat, and urban problems in dwelling and road construction. The Col development. soil has good potential for urban and recreational devek In irrigated areas these soils are suited to all crops ment. Road design can be modified to compensate for t commonly grown in the area, including corn, sugar beets, limited capacity of this soil to support a load. Capabil beans, alfalfa, small grain, and onions. An example of a subclass IIe irrigated, IVe nonirrigated; Loamy Pla suitable cropping system is 3 to 4 years of alfalfa fol- range site. lowed by corn, corn for silage, sugar beets, small grain, or 83—Wiley-Colby complex, 3 to 5 percent slopes. T beans. Land leveling, ditch lining, and installing pipelines gently sloping map unit is on plains at elevations of 4; may be needed for proper water applications. to 5,000 feet. The Wiley soil makes up about 60 percent All methods of irrigation are suitable, but furrow ir- the unit, and the Colby soil about 30 percent. About rigation is the most common. Barnyard manure and com- percent is Heldt silty clay and Weld loam. mercial fertilizer are needed for top yields. The Wiley soil is deep and well drained. It formed In nonirrigated areas these soils are suited to winter calcareous eolian deposits. Typically the surface layer wheat, barley, and sorghum. Most of the acreage is pale brown silt loam about 11 inches thick. The subsoi planted to winter wheat. The predicted average yield is pale brown silty clay loam about 23 inches thick. The s 28 bushels per acre. The soil is summer fallowed in al- stratum to a depth of 60 inches is very pale brown s: ternate years to allow moisture accumulation. Generally clay loam. precipitation is too low for beneficial use of fertilizer. Permeability is moderately slow. Available wa Stubble mulch farming, striperopping, and minimum til- capacity is high. The effective rooting depth is 60 inc lage are needed to control soil blowing and water erosion. or more. Surface runoff is medium to rapid, and the E Terracing also may be needed to control water erosion. sion hazard is moderate. The potential native vegetation is dominated by blue The Colby soil also is deep and well drained and fort- grama. Several mid grasses such as western wheatgrass in calcareous eolian deposits. Typically the surface la and needleandthread are also present. Potential produc- is pale brown loam about 7 inches thick- The underl5 tion ranges from 1,600 pounds per acre in favorable years material is very pale brown silt loam to a depth of to 1,000 pounds in unfavorable years. As range condition inches. deteriorates, the mid grasses decrease; blue grama, buf- Permeability is moderate. Available water capacit: falograss, snakeweed, yucca and fringed sage increase; high. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or m• and forage production drops. Undesirable weeds and an- Surface runoff is medium to rapid, and the erosion haz nuals invade the site as range condition becomes poorer. is moderate. r.":74 , ,4_:••••: : b > Y R /ib Y t. G ' ^ k x .fin Y ''," M1 •I C.-; . 0%.,:. 41. y. '{' 'r r x A 1 2 1981 ,.,,, Recorder ''"� '1t htn • 4 _� .«" ' a•"`t "'• Sta a Documentary Fes '''' t. 1, Box 78, 19504 Weld County Dr,e JAN 121981 2 1981 i '�' .k , d0,,, Road 45, Berthoud ' County of Weld ,State of • .3.3. So • Colorado for the consideration of THREE HUND D • THIRTY-FIVE THOUSAND AND NO/100 ($335,000.001- -- • e dollars, M hand paid, herehy aell(s) and comcy(s) to • WILLIAM BRADLEY PICKERT and EVERDINA ANNAMARIE PICKERT 0 ..e whmmlugaladdressis Rt. 1, Box 78, 19504 Weld County Road 45, County of • r Berthoud, Colorado c` o , and State of the following real property in the r .4 County of Weld , and State of Colorado, to wit: , �•, e The property more fully described on Exhibit _4.. , A which is attached hereto and is incorporated -, herein by this reference. i • with all its appurtenances, and warrants title to the same, subject to: Taxes and assessments for 1981 and subsequent years; easements ° and rights-of-way existing or of record, and boundary discrepancies t or encroachments that may be disclosed in an accurate survey; patent I'- i O reservations and restrictions of record; prior mineral reservations ,,u and conveyances of record; and existing mineral and oil and gas ;• a � leases of record; covenants and agreements of record as the same •xi'= ;, n may affect the subject property; and existing encumbrance in favor i}_,'. Np e of Larwill A. Biddle and Lois S. Biddle, recorded as Reception No. 1649181 in Book 727 Weld Count Records, '" County given to st.cure a promissory note dated November 25, 1974, in the original principal " sum of $140,000.00, provided, however, that Grantor shall pay and discharge said indebtedness and encumbrance as and when the payments and obligations thereon become due, and shall indemnify and hold ' XKira(lieNoi a6Yi(eiffsi AUXAX harmless Grantees, their heirs, representativ e ;o successors and assigns, from any loss or liability including reasonable attorney's fees, }n connection with or arising out f such indebtedness and encumbrance, it being understood that Grantees do not assume nor agree to pay or discharge such indebtedness and encumbrance. 1 rH Signed this 8th day of Janna ; , 19 81, ,1//_ ...,c,‘ ,/ �. WAY t E. K BS w_ • STATE OF COLORADO. �ss. " County of Boulder 1 _. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 8th r;Y'it day of January ,19 81 by Wayne" E. Krebs. �t,''t q Witness comness my nd and August 4, 1981 Witness my hand and official seal tti �� . 7 �a�+141ite< s J� �yci. Uft,, . • , Nt OM •eereu,PM—Shwv.,.-erNe.wrutlwem•O.. nw.64.,..me..w.• .aaa..,.,w.w.Y W—,�min♦aw—iss .. . - �, r Or 6 `7R,1 if �: .. .1! :.J,S Vw • Q,c ti Y: "• s 9OO'925 18466"!9 1 EXHIBIT A .2-a , „ `t� . To Warranty Deed dated 'January �_, 198I, between Wayne . To E. Krebs, Grantor and William Bradley Pickert and Everdina Annemarie Picket, Grantees. + 1 ' i'.. The property knoum as Boxc:,r Dairy, located at Route 1, Box •F'_ 78, 1?504 Weld County Road 65, Berthoud, Colorado, 80513, .4 - being more fully described as follows: That portion of the West Half (Wy) of Section Twen-y-eight 11:111:, (26) , Township Foer (4) North, Range Sixty-eight (66) West of the 6th P.M. , County of Weld, State of Colorado, described (,- _. -- as follows: `:: '.$6.2', Considering the West line of the NWk of Section 28 as bearing '; g - .qp„y, I. North and South and with all bearings contained herein �' rl , relative thereto; r p Beginning at the West Quarter Corner (W1/4 Cor) of said Section ;+.� )` 28; thence along the West line of the WW1, North 1319.12 :0.k feet, more or less, to the North line of the South half ` (Sy) of the WW1: thence along said North line North 89°52'30" East, 897,10 feet; ` thence South 6.21144' E,st, 526.27 foet; i. ---` thence South 11°0'9'19" East, 964.51 feet; , - , thence South 38°34' 30• East, 604.85 feet; +.. thence West 1495.50 feet to the West line of the SW�1 of said � � �,�., �A Section 28; p.��1 y thence along said West line North 0.24 ' 30" East, 622.98 feet1. �`*4` - . ', to the Point of Beginning. « h Together with all appurtenances theretr • and together with all R water and ditch rights appurtenant thecetc, including (1' hare �.,,.' 1 i 4j of the capital stock of the New Ish, (10) share of the capital 46r ' .- s "a stock of the Ida Startird Ditch and Reservoir Company, and (1) 1yq 4,- t : a. Little Thompson Water District domestic water tap. And together '°L laf"�,.. with all Dairy parlor equipment, including but not. limited to �'�. : � ` milking units, bulk tanks, pipe lines, automatic take-offs, etc. , �,( Big-Dutchman grain tank and feeding system, (1) propane tank, ??yF � , water tanks, three-phase portable generator, corral gates, '" and together with the dishwa-Mer, range, refrigerator, :arpets, 74:".'I + • drapes and rods in the residence on such property. rs�7.. f :.. .• 4<' t i /]fj 4. u. it ii, Cu . f. • a «+f'_ 1 vw J l x ` �., t i �F'1 ', N. or el�f a! . memoRAnDum ilk Keith Schuett Weld County Planning July 18, 1990 Te Date COLORADO From Environmental Protection Services/j �ckwA �/,� Brad Pickert Dairy Farm Subject. The Division has reviewed and evaluated the site of the proposed dairy expansion located at 19504 WCR 5. The design as follows appears to be adequate and in compliance with the Colorado Guidelines for Feedlot Runoff Containment. JS522/dgc Enclosures l CY , CS- /OW-t2S -6;2 / WLEI CCU -Y.,Cutd ��i,LkSJ2,0_, /// sCi;72 (7 5/6:avid:- * d * /az / acs- 603 //= -7 ,≥4) /3 7.2nd ll _ jnQ�6 , um 96/4 � * /06/-99-e -66 -6/3 6' ,v 9622c, )W /554/ etc) c)/ 1. I/a, X6543 vow-09_0 -06 - 6Yj (9/61f ile14_ aciot kse r etuzi _ o -2y,3k /Qv1 a9 6'00 0/V Net eq. / R4 Dera Crowe Sr- 53- ) ruikA«.,\._ 8icd @ILL tc-.) � J 37 c k; 6 5/._� d/0 /- 025'--v act 6/7 Oicatzt .��.� ka t9 79/l) 0',5' ,gezaitkee , DC 781 )s.s. . COUNTY ‘JF WELD t David a ::~y;-roJ.c' .< being :sc.t_.Z =1vvc::,r;-:, says that he is publisher of le New News, a weeklynewspaper published in 1`.C--'ens.'=_t_il`g in said County nt',y and ?tc".t'.e'a that said newspaper has a gE'nc l c3. `"ct1..t.i`l !.3.;. n in y,'.:;.id Ct".:il_nt.J and `t ci s been t:C)Ct t:i.l•:c u F y and uninterruptedly pl.lblished therein , d...ri.no _. period iod of r�.'t. least c` _ .mot.1 .i. f ty-tw consecutive week'y: prior to the 'ri.r_t publication of the a[t.lC.xed nc t.i..c_y that said newspaper is a 1l....tl.._pcan.-f•_. '�t1't,�_l.fl t.t'{4..'. 'its-.r.i't •..i the c' � 4 _ - _r..,. r NO'11CLr OF PUBLIC NEARING act of t!-If_ i:�C:.FSfi�'I-:•' I='•_::r�lTtt::ly of the ]� ._ l . .. a.. ew ,: t The Weld S:o P bl!"C wt'ct-''f_�' C'#` .�_;...�'," ,":;C}s t: .� entitled C.:t �-1S: t';C ring � wwy Aa puZl, to r•••r.:g t..s l y..t. `.h€:? printing of legal 1990, al 1:90 p.m. [v' theft notices and aC:`vC:r't:isC:',':c=:n't.sgr` and &y r' a and irThrte nir?e≥-tt:fr•ent.sv thereto; that the notice Row. iroo rtil request may create a vested tom. which t!�i a ..:.f�f)=:.-e_,e`ry is printed P4 .._4 d Rro��{y��pr i� pursuant to of't' �'- ._ ie €� '_> i'S . r �..:�\.} W1U16�LA� Yom'.. (31.-Pe ''_akc,zn i•rom so.id n .-t't,C-pcli'.e r, Wr?.?` APPLICANT: D,m{..n g.•..a1,y p t�:'l i '`{�'t:i i.n '.l€.j newspaper, .:.�.it e in : ��y And Everdlr,a An Marie aa' 1 DF,.Sl'RIPTION: Part d the e t•'t.•€l i s t.. and entire issue of Wln Section 28 r RBBW of the 8th P.M., Vtfeld bounty, e.,,a t,.>,; t-s c.1:It b r t l_e r€o t Colorado TYYPP�Epppp��SEEAND INTENSITY OF �Pconflaement ope�•on {1,O head once week for �ry with siz reaidera�s). _._..___.._._. _....._. . nkTiON: Soath of Weld E. t t. ,r a i ,.t-�• t_,e e i.c� t h t:l'� said f't o" ice County Road 42 and east of and .. •- adlacent to Weld County Road 5. :,4'a s 'sue' published i n said newspaper A �lic �ivlIrtaadll be ld In t_tr€lp(7:'r ar;-'_j not. in Any sup 7j.€c':lt':"'1-1'l': Weld Counrtv�Co Floor, m sea t t...a 3�'e o i . and �..1-t_•t t the e first CounHeaty Centennial Center, 915 l i Tenth Street,,reeleY Colorado. 1"�l t'{.3 l i.c; •t:.i [:n `` said; D t.i C_e tit f oar objections related to ' �e ehonld bg r t::t i`'-:c�i l i i L`: i t' ••^+ Countsubmitted ZNof Plann Planning More County of 9 59 5y TenthoStreet, 8 Roorin Cl ;•,: �,? �_ j c.) Q 6 ,, MoeteGGthe above date or preea,ted _11 at the public hearing on August 21, 1990. a ;^ day Copies of the application are et t`d t .F..: last t'.,,' C. i on a" available for public inspection in the Department of Planning Services Hoorn 942, Weld County le, T. Centennial Center 915 Tenth n ..___4 l 6.---'. Street, Greeley, Colwell 90891 - .. .. .. (' j Phoae-3S8-t000,Ertenaion 4400. (1. ( �� c�+*+mi,vsien r \ A0 be 1110oce (1) time by _w...e •:......_ ....... . ::�Sr�_....._....._.... AogaM 2,iambi. The New News ;at.,kw.t_'. ...ht d tr d s:ssw ,rn !:a`f re L 5, v .._.._ .-._. ^� ..............:. Ocu s'�� o Mp 0 2)01/ AUG 1 3 1990 f—J ':., .-T-_._.T L) Mw Commission expires March 15,199 \\ DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES � PHONE(303)3584000,EXT.4400� 91510th STREET ige GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 COLORADO NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Weld County Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, August 21, 1990, at 1:30 p.m. for the purpose of considering a Site Specific Development Plan and a Site Review permit for the property described below. Approval of the request may create a vested property right pursuant to Colorado Law. APPLICANT: William Bradley Picker and Everdina Ann Marie Pickert LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the W1 of Section 28, T4N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado TYPE AND INTENSITY OF PROPOSED USE: Livestock confinement operation (1,000 head dairy with six residences) . LOCATION: South of Weld County Road 42 and east of and adjacent to weld County Road 5. SIZE: 47 acres, more or less The public hearing will be held in the Weld County Commissioners' Hearing Room, First Floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado. Comments or objections related to the above request should be submitted in writing to the Weld County Department of Planning Services, 915 Tenth Street, Room 342, Greeley, Colorado 80631, before the above date or presented at the public hearing on August 21, 1990. Copies of the application are available for public inspection in the Department of Planning Services, Room 342, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado 80631 - Phone - 356-4000, Extension 4400. Ernie Ross, Chairman Weld County Planning Commission To be published in the New News To be published one (1) time by August 2, 1990 Received by: Am L4�J�i0; Date: l /�/llll�� Hello