The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About931730.tiff1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 i 1 1 I 1 1 21 years ago a decision was made to put it 2 in. You don't put the fox in charge of the henhouse. 3 Somebody dropped the ball. The gentleman that came up 4 with the water here a minute ago, obviously, he was 5 trespassing. We have never posted the place, but in 6 visiting with him here a little bit ago and trying to 7 determine where he picked that water up on the place, 8 he can't tell me. He doesn't know which pond it was 9 out of. 10 He says there was a light somewhere in 11 there. We don't have any lights on the post, not like 12 he's describing. He came in on a gravel or dirt road. 13 We are right on the pavement. The access to the place 14 is on the pavement. So I question, actually, if he 15 even knows where he got that from. 16 One other question I do have, and then I 17 will sit down. In the presentations, there is 18 ambiguity to me in terms of height above existing 19 terrain. On our place alone, we have better -- I'd say 20 better than a 100 -foot elevation in that half mile to 21 the west side. 22 Are you starting at the bottom of the 23 drainage, or are you starting at the top of the hill 24 for your original amount of fill you put in? There is 25 no defined notification of this anywhere. 178 I BILLINGS REPORTING SERVICE 931061 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 r 1 1 I 1 1 1 It seems to me that attorneys can argue, 2 that people can become emotional, but what's the real 3 issue? The issue is what are we going to do with 4 what's happening now, not what happened 20 years ago. 5 What you folks do here today or tomorrow or the next 6 day, when you make your decision on whether you are 7 going to continue to allow the landfill to fill and 8 close properly, is going to determine what happens to 9 our place down there. 10 Is the County ready to clean it up? They 11 haven't done so in 20 years. They haven't monitored it 12 in 20 years. I know it's not your fault. But, again, 13 someone dropped the ball. 14 As far as some of these landfill papers, 15 recommendations from County, State, Federal Government, 16 it takes time to get things through the bureaucracy. 17 I've worked in it for years. And I hope things will 18 move along so we can all have a decision on this in a 19 very short time. 20 Thank you for your attention. Do you have 21 any questions? 22 MS. HARBERT: Any questions for Mr. Hayes? 23 Thank you, Mr. Hayes. 24 Mr. Kammerzell? Or Mrs. Kammerzell. 25 Mrs. Florence Kammerzell. I apologize. 179 BILLINGS REPORTING SERVICE 901061 Y 1 I 1 i 1 r 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 (Off record comments.) 2 MS. KAMMERZELL: I am Florence Kammerzell. 3 I guess I'm the new kid on the block. We have only 4 been on our farm since 1963. 5 Madam Chairman, County Commissioners, I 6 endorse what Mr. Van Hayes said. I swear he read my 7 notes. The only thing I want to endorse is that the 8 issue is like spilled milk. The 1971 engineering plans 9 and Mr. Moffat's plans are behind u^. 10 That the landfill was used and operated 11 under poor county Commissioners' judgment is not the 12 point today. By the way, who was the County attorney 13 at that time? Today's point is we do have a cleanup 14 job. Mr. Hayes' graphic photographs endorse that, and 15 I agree. 16 May I address the Waste Management or the 17 Waste Services? Do I understand that Waste Management 18 is already making physical improvements to correct the 19 past 20 years and will continue to clean up the 20 problems and close the landfill in a proper and 21 ecological, fit manner? 22 UNIDENTIFIED PERSON: Yes. 23 MS. KAMMERZELL: Then I ask, do we of Weld 24 County, do you, the Cctnty Commissioners, plan to pay 25 for the cleanup if the landfill is closed? 180 BILLINGS REPORTING SERVICE 931.061 1 I I I I 1 1 S 1 1 If pollutants are there, then I believe we 2 should let the Waste Management get on to the 3 commitment, according to Health and State regulations, 4 for our future protection. 5 Thank you. 6 MS. HARBERT: Thank you, Florence. 7 Fred Rehmer; is that correct? 8 UNIDENTIFIED PERSON: He had to leave. 9 MS. ;;HARBERT: He had to leave, all right. 10 Some of you may not have chosen to speak, and that's 11 fine. 12 Sharon Davis, you've already spoken; is 13 that correct? 14 MS. DAVIS: Yes. 15 MS. HARBERT: Diane McMullin? 16 MS. McMULLIN: I'm against, not for. 17 That's written incorrectly. 18 My name is Diane McMullin. I live at 19 1012 Cranford Place. I am a student at UNC. And on 20 behalf of COPIRG, which is Colorado Public Interest 21 Research Group, the University of Northern Colorado 22 Chapter of COPIRG supports the efforts of the Colorado 23 residents concerned over water. 24 The issues being discussed today concerning 25 the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill are more the rule 181 BILLINGS REPORTING SES.VICE 901061 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 than the exception to landfills around the state. 2 According to information released by the United States 3 Public Interest Research Group and COPIRG, more than 4 half the landfills in the state will close within five 5 years because they cannot meet Federal RCRA standards. 6 Environmental and health problems 7 surrounding unlined and unregulated lakes concern 8 COPIRG, and COPIRG sees the need to clean up landfills 9 that are hazardous to the land and people around them. 10 Thank you. 11 MS. HARBERT: Thank you. 12 The court reporter has asked that anyone 13 that reads a prepared statement give a copy of it to 14 her with your name on it. It makes it easier for her 15 to transcribe it later on. 16 If you have a prepared statement and would 17 bring it up to her, we would appreciate it. If you 18 want it back, make a note on it that you want it back, 19 and she will see that you get it returned. Thank you. 20 Dr. Ray Knapp? 21 would June Kane, if you are in the 22 audience, would you be prepared to be next, please. 23 DR. KNAPP: I'm Ray Knapp. I am live at 24 5960 - 37th Street. I have been living there for 25 26 years. When the landfill first opened up there, I 182 1 BILLINGS REPORTING SERVICE 901061 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 was really quite supportive of it, because it was close 2 to only three miles from where I lived and it seemed to 3 be a much better location than the previous dumps. 4 Back in 1966, when I first came here, we 5 were taking our tin cans and bottles --- at that time 6 you didn't take all your trash to the clump, but we took 7 them to the dump by Kersey, and it was dumped in a pit 8 right close to the river, just like right on the flood 9 plain. 10 The second dump site that we took it to was 11 down in Evans, again right near the river. I thought 12 these were just horrible places to be dumping trash. 13 So this seemed to be a much better place. It was 14 located higher, a little bit farther away from the 15 river. 16 I've been hauling my own trash to the dump 17 for all these 26 years. I have a little 4 -by -7 foot 18 trailer. The most that Weld County landfill ever 19 charged me for taking my trash to the dump was $7.00. 20 But then we had a change of management; Waste 21 Management came in. I found out they wanted $18.50. 22 Mr. Butler says Waste Management wants to 23 be neighborly. I don't know if that's a very 24 neighborly thing to increase the fees on a neighbor by 25 200 percent. I got to thinking, maybe a lot of people, 183 BILLINGS REPORTING SERVICE 931061 ' i i I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I i I 1 rather than taking their trash to the dump and paying 2 those high rates, will say, Hey, maybe some other place 3 I can just dump it alongside of the road. 4 So I think that's an issue which we haven't 5 really thought about, these high rates they are going 6 to be charging. It seems like they are not only -- 7 well, I walked out there and found at their gate they 8 have actually raised their rates, so now it will cost 9 me $20 for my little trailerload of trash. 10 I guess over the years that; I've been 11 there, I live on this major route -- there's two major 12 routes going from the city of Greeley out to the dump. 13 My 37th Street is one of them, and I have been picking 14 up trash for years. 15 I mean, it's all kinds of trash, old 16 furniture, limbs are dropped off loads. I do know that 17 the landfill has a sign up there saying, If you bring 18 an uncovered load, we will charge you more, but it's 19 been very ineffective. We still have a tremendous 20 amount of trash being dumped. 21 If the Waste Management was really 22 neighborly, I think they would be patrolling these 23 major routes and picking up this trash that their 24 customers dropped off their loads. That's really -- 25 one other thing I might say. 184 I BILLINGS REPORTING SERVICE 921061 1 1 1 I I I 1 r 1 1 I 1 1 1 I was looking around for another place to 2 take my trash last January, and so I wound up way down 3 at Erie, that landfill, and that was really an eye 4 opening for me. I drove in there, and there was this 5 huge, great big pit down there, very deep, had a large 6 capacity, and it was lined. It opened up my eyes to 7 what a landfill should really look like. 8 I said, Well, this is such an improvement 9 over what we have here in Central Weld County. Why 10 can't we have this kind of a dump to take our trash 11 to? So I really think we have to look at the broad 12 issue. 13 And it sort of irked me this morning when 14 I heard the people from Waste Management trying to 15 grandfather themselves into this process. I think back 16 in the 1960s, early 1970s, we weren't very much 17 environmentally aware as we are today. They are more 18 sophisticated, and we shouldn't accept the conditions 19 that were laid down 22 years ago for the operation of 20 10 or 15 years. 21 Well, that's my statement. Thank you. 22 MS. H.ARBERT: Are there any questions for 23 Dr. Knapp? 24 I have one. How much did it cost you to 25 take your trash to Erie? BILLINGS REPORTING SERVICE 185 186 1 DR. KNAPP: It's $11.00. 2 MS. HARBERT: Thank you. 3 DR. KNAPP: So it was a bit cheaper. 4 MS. KIRki-.EYER: Plus gas? 5 MS. HARBERT: Plus your gas. 6 DR. KNAPP: Plus my gas. I don't like to 7 drive that far, but . . . 8 Maybe I'll find another place. But it 9 seems like Waste Management will be taking over every 10 dump and will have a monopoly and they can raise the 11 rates as high as they want to. 12 MS. HARBERT: Thank you. Are there any 13 other questions. 14 June Kane? 15 Ella Marie Hayes, would you be the next to 16 speak, please. 17 MS. KANE: My name is June Kane. I live at 18 712 - 14th Avenue. Madam Chairperson and 19 Commissioners, my comments will be brief and I hope 20 pertinent to your mission. 21 I represent today the Greeley Audubon 22 Society and its 220 members throughout Weld County. 23 Our goals are to share our pleasure in the natural 24 world and to encourage healthy, life -supporting 25 surroundings for all creatures. BILLINGS REPORTING SERVICE 931061 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i I 1 1 we are here to listen and to learn. We do 2 question what effect a much larger landfill operating 3 for many more years might have on the nearby Big 4 Thompson River. we hope this hearing will clarify the 5 condition of groundwaters and of the river water both 6 now and in some future projection. 7 On our field trips to the area and river, 8 we see a variety of animals and birds, including our 9 great national bird, bald eagles, whose main food is 10 fish from rivers. We must keep our waterways as pure 11 as possible for ourselves and for wildlife. 12 Busiresses that bring money to the 13 community must nct receive greater consideration than 14 the health and well-being of people and wildlife. If 15 there has been a lack of consistent, orderly mcaitoring 16 of this operation under an approved design and 17 operations plan, then it is the duty of the County and 18 State to take action. 19 Waste Management, probably the largest 20 disposal business in the United States, reportedly 21 takes in 4 billion dollars a year. If the company 22 inherited problems at the site, we assume it is willing 23 to help rectify past mistakes and oversights to bring 24 this landfill in line with the best available 25 practices. 187 I BILLINGS REPORTING SERVICE Ja-010sa. 1 188 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 Also, is waste being trucked into this 2 landfill from other counties and states? We are told 3 there is a recycling program at the landfill and we 4 commend the owners for this. 5 You commissioners are charged with 6 promoting a healthy economic environment which need not 7 be inconsistent with a healthy natural environment. We 8 commend the Ashton -Daniels Neighborhood Action Group 9 for alerting the community to this matter, and we thank 10 all participants in this hearing. 11 Thank you. 12 MS. HARBERT: Thank you. 13 Ella Marie Hayes. And then Jon Stephens. 14 MS. HAYES: Madam Chairman, Members of the 15 Board, I'm Ella Marie Hayes from Saratoga, Wyoming, and 16 I am a Spomer. My sister, Susanne Spomer Stephens, and 17 I are the property owners directly south of the 18 landfill. 19 My husband spoke for us, and I believe he 20 basically covered everything that I needed to say, and 21 Florence Kammerzell also did say some things. I just 22 had a couple of points I wanted to make. 23 The gentleman that brought the black water 24 up, number one, obviously, trespassing on our land, and 25 this, if the term radical was used -- and I might have 1 BILLINGS REPORTING SERVICE 189 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 i 1 been the one guilty of using the term radical -- I was 2 not referring to being environmentally open, because 3 I'm an environmentalist myself. What I was referring 4 to were the methods that have been used. This was not 5 a very scientific method. 6 I recall as a child -- and that's obviously 7 kefore the landfill went in -- we began to -- we begged 8 and pestered our parents to go swim in the lake. 9 within a few minutes of being in that lake, we emerged 10 covered with black muck. We never were allowed to go 11 swim in that lake again. 12 So I don't think that was a very scientific 13 exhibit. And this is the thing that we have objected 14 to. So many of •the exhibits are taken out of context. 15 Are they really valid? 16 And we are not here today to decide whether 17 1991 (sic) was correct. I think we all agree it 18 wasn't. We don't understand why it wasn't put in 19 writing. We all know today written agreements. 20 We are here to decide what we are going to 21 do in 1993 to determine the best future for ourselves 22 and our next generation. And we do feel that Waste 23 Management has already made a commitment, they've 24 already started, and we do feel that they are the ones 25 that can go forward and clean up this. 1 BILLINGS REPORTING SERVICE I I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 And I do think that the Ashton -Daniels 2 group still has a role to play. Keep watch. And 3 everyone can do this. But I still believe Waste 4 Management is the way to go, and we would like to see 5 them be able to continue operation. 6 Thank you. 7 MS. HARBERT: Mr. Stephens. 8 MR. STEPHENS: Chairperson Harbert and 9 Commissioners, my name is Jon Stephens, Stove Prairie, 10 Colorado. I would like to say that I agree with Van 11 Hayes and the others that have spoken as far as the 12 best future for the Central Weld County Landfill. 13 What I would like to urge is now a spirit 14 of cooperation between the Commissioners, the County 15 Health Department, the State Health Department, Waste 16 Management, to solve this problem. This is not going 17 to go away by our meeting here today. 18 That problem is sitting out there festering 19 right now while we talk. And the only way we are going 20 to be able to solve that problem is technology, 21 financial capability, and the determination and the 22 oversight provided by the State and County officials to 23 make sure that it's done. 24 Thank you. Do you have any questions? 25 MS. HARBERT: Do you have any questions of 190 BILLINGS REPORTING SERVICE 921061 191 1 Mr. Stephens? 2 MR. STEPHENS: Thank you. 3 MS. HARBERT: Thank you. 4 Susanne Stephens. 5 MS. STEPHENS: Madam Chairperson and County 6 Commissioners, I'm the other half of the Spomer 7 landowners, and I think everyone in my family has just 8 spoken and given me -- said everything that I feel in 9 my heart. And I think we have to not concentrate on 10 1971; it's 1993. We have to go forward. We have to 11 have this problem corrected. 12 And, again, Waste Management is the company 13 that has the expertise and the finances to do it. Does 14 the County? Does the State? And I think they are 15 committed, and with all of us cooperating, it will be 16 done. 17 18 19 And I thank you. MS. HARBERT: Thank you. (Discussion off the record.) 20 Did you not say your name? 21 MR. WEBSTER: You said you are related. 22 MS. STEPHENS: I'm sorry. I'm Susanne 23 Spomer Stephens. I'm sorry. 24 MS. HARBERT: I have a Bradley Carver. 25 MR. CARVER: Yes. I'm here to speak on BILLINGS REPORTING SERVICE 921061 192 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 behalf 2 3 MS. HARBERT: Would you state your name. MR. CARVER: My name is Bradley Carver. I'm 4 the board chair for the Colorado Public Interest 5 Research Group, and I am just here to 6 the University of Northern Colorado. 7 the efforts to close and clean up the speak on behalf We fully support Central Weld 8 Sanitary Landfill for the following reasons -- and just 9 forgive me. I'm just going to read the statement, due 10 to brevity. 11 According to estimates by the Environmental 12 Protection Agency, 50 percent of Colorado's landfills 13 will close in the next five to eight years because they 14 cannot meet Federal health and safety laws. By these 15 standards, the Central Weld Landfill is certainly not 16 the exception,, rather the rule. 17 As an unlined facility located in a major 18 drainage basin, and 19 unacceptable waste, 20 standards necessary 21 having accepted several forms of this landfill cannot meet the to ensure public health and safety. In addition, the cost of cleaning up a 22 100 -acre landfill in Colorado to meet with Federal 23 regulations would be approximately $65 million. Rather 24 than extending the life of this unsafe landfill for 25 another decade and escalating the costs of its eventual BILLINGS REPORTING SERVICE 9241061 1 1 i 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 cleanup, we at COPIRG feel the resources must be 2 focused on closing the site and cleaning it up now. 3 In addition, the development of effective 4 recycling programs, from collection to processing, to 5 purchasing, must be implemented to divert trash from 6 the waste stream and extend the lives of the truly safe 7 and sanitary landfills already in operation today, such 8 as the facility located near Ault, Colorado. 9 Thank you. 10 MS. HARBERT: Thank you. 11 J.B. Merrell. 12 MR. MERRELL: Thank you. My name is J.B. 13 Merrell. I live on East 18th, and I am representing 14 Bunting Trash Service today. I am not representing our 15 over 7,000 customers, but I would like to think that we 16 are speaking in their best interests. 17 We know all about the increase in the 18 landfill rates, and we can empathize, too, with the 19 good doctor, what he has had to bear in increased 20 rates. However, we are against an immediate closing of 21 the landfill. 22 We, too, would like to believe the best 23 about Waste Management and their ability to close the 24 landfill properly. If the landfill were closed 25 immediately, that drastically changes our mode of 193 BILLINGS REPORTING SERVICE 93106: 1 194 e 1 1 1 1 1 1 e 1 1 operations and where we have to dump all of our 2 customers' trash, which is going to be in the Ault 3 area. 4 That is going to increase our overhead, and 5 as water trickles down, we would like to think the best 6 about our ability to control that and not pass that 7 increase to our customers, but that could very much be 8 a reality. 9 So we are in favor of a closing, the 10 inevitable closing of this landfill, but not an 11 immediate closing, and we would like to think that our 12 position is in the best interest of over 7,000 business 13 and private consumers. 14 Thank you. 15 MS. HARBERT: Thank you. 16 That's all the cards I have. Is there 17 anyone else who would like to speak for or against? 18 MS. KAMMERZELL: I have a postscript. 19 MS. HARBERT: We don't usually allow that. 20 Just this one. 21 MS. KAMMERZELL: This is Florence 22 Kammerzell. I did want to emphasize our farm was on 23 the map. We are about a mile and a half north of the 24 landfill, so, therefore, our water table is much higher 25 than the Thompson drainage. We have never been able to BILLINGS REPORTING SERVICE .97 .061 I 195 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 drill a well for water consumption due to the high 2 mineral content, hard water. 3 MS. HARBERT: Is there anyone else who 4 would like to speak for or against? 5 State your name, please. 6 MR. DANIELS: Tom Daniels. I live at 7 2732 Weld County Road 27-1/2, Milliken. I'm worried 8 about what is in the landfill. Waste Management 9 collects or samples and sends them to their labs. Then 10 they send a report to the Health Department. I'd feel 11 safer if the Health Department took samples and did 12 testing in their lab. 13 For four generations we have lived by the 14 Big Thompson. I'd like to have my family here, but I'm 15 scared of what I see in the ditches. I want future 16 generations to be able to live by the Big Thompson and 17 have a good life like everyone deserves. 18 Please help my generation's dreams come 19 true by closing the landfill. Thank you. 20 MS. HARBERT: Thank you. 21 Is there anyone else that would like to 22 speak for or against? 23 Come forward, please. If you have not 24 spoken before, come forward and state your name and 25 address for the record. I BILLINGS REPORTING SERVICE I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 MS. CHENEY: I am Kay Cheney. I am a 2 member of the Greeley Audubon Society and I live out in 3 Weld County, 52230 weld County Road 149. 4 And I would like an answer to a question, 5 if possible. Are we getting a lot of truckloads coming 6 into the landfill from other counties and from other 7 states? 8 MS. HARBERT: I'm not sure that really 9 concerns our question today, but we'll see that Waste 10 Management answers that when the time comes. 11 MR. ROY: The answer is no. The short 12 answer is no. 13 MS. CHENEY: Thank you. 14 MS. HARBERT: Is there anyone else who has 15 not spoken who would like to speak for or against the 16 probable cause hearing -- the show cause hearing? 17 Hearing none, Waste Management, we will 18 give you the floor to rebut. We are now closing the 19 public hearing part, portion of this hearing, the 20 public input of this hearing. 21 MR. ROY: Am I to understand I'm last? 22 MS. HARBERT: You are last, sir, thank 23 goodness. 24 MR. ROY: Good. First, to address the 25 questions from the neighborhood that were proposed in 196 I BILLINGS REPORTING SERVICE 901061 197 1 writing through the County Attorney. 2 MS. HARBERT: We don't have those 3 questions. 4 MR. ROY: I'll read you the questions and 5 give you the answers. 6 MS. HARBERT: All right. Thank you. 7 MR. ROY: The first question is -- and 8 they weren't numbered, so I'll say it's the first 9 question -- Waste Services, Inc. and Waste Management, 10 Inc., where are your other landfills in Weld County and 11 Colorado? 12 I didn't see the tag to that about 13 Colorado. There are two other landfills operated by 14 Waste Services or Waste Management in weld County. One 15 is on Highway 14 east of -- or correction -- west of 16 Ault, Colorado, approximately 25 miles from Greeley. 17 The other is located near Keenesburg, was recently 18 certificated, is not open, and probably will not be 19 open for a year, and is substantially further away from 20 Greeley than is the facility near Ault. 21 Second question is -- and there are others 22 in Colorado, I think down further south -- What is the 23 expected life of your other facilities in Weld County 24 and the state of Colorado? 25 Again addressing the Weld County BILLINGS REPORTING SERVICE 91061 1 198 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i i 1 1 1 1 1 1 facilities, both are anticipated to have a life of 2 30 -plus years. That estimate obviously contemplates 3 Central Weld remaining open for a while, and so those 4 lives may be somewhat shortened, if Central Weld were 5 closed. 6 Third, if Central Weld Landfill is closed, 7 is there capacity available in or in the near term to 8 take solid waste in Weld County? 9 The obvious answer is yes, but not without 10 expense, and not without two kinds of expense and 11 costs. One is the obvious increased cost of 12 transportation for the major metropolitan area in Weld 13 County, which is Greeley and its environs, to a solid 14 waste disposal site. And that's already been alluded 15 to by one of the witnesses. 16 Also included, or should be calculated, is 17 environmental costs of transporting that waste that 18 distance, heavy trucks operating over a much larger 19 distance, consuming much more fuel, having an impact on 20 the air far in excess of what is now the case. 21 And there is a third and perhaps more 22 indirect impact that Dr. Knapp, perhaps inadvertently, 23 referred to. And that is when he said, Perhaps I'll 24 find a better place. He had driven down to Laidlaw, 25 which is, I think, 30 miles. He says he will find a 1 BILLINGS REPORTING SERVICE I 1 1 1 1 I 1 e 1 better place. 2 I suggest many others will find a better 3 place and leave it in the borrow pits around the county 4 rather than drive to Ault or Laidlaw or drive to 5 Keenesburg, and that is an environmental impact you can 6 almost be assured will occur if the availability of 7 safe disposal becomes more inconvenient to the 8 consuming public. 9 The licensed carriers, obviously, will have 10 to abide by those rules, but the private people like 11 Dr. Knapp might find a, quote, better place. 12 Questions were addressed basically to Brad 13 Keirnes, the second group of questions. What are the 14 dates of his family ownership of the landfill? 15 His family ownership of the landfill or the 16 ownership of the landfill by corporations which his 17 family controlled commenced in June of 1979 and 18 terminated in July of 1991. 19 Did his family file an engineering report 20 and design and operations plan with the State of 21 Colorado Department of Health for its approval? 22 I think the answer is that they did not 23 file any document bearing that name. They filed a 24 large number of documents with the Department of 25 Health, some of which were prepared by engineers who 199 BILLINGS REPORTING SERVICE n-"11 6 1 200 1 i 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 were consulting engineers to them, dealing with the 2 operation of the landfill. Whether those constitute, 3 in collection, such a document, I don't know. 4 But suffice it to say, during their 5 ownership they were in fairly constant contact and 6 worked with the Colorado Department of Health. 7 Was there an engineering report and design 8 and operations plan submitted to the State Department 9 of Health for its approval by those who owned and 10 operated the landfill prior to his family ownership? 11 Well, whoever wrote the question knows that 12 Mr. Keirnes can't answer that question. He wasn't 13 there. Any answer he would give would be speculative. 14 There is allusion in the letter submitted by counsel 15 that there was one. The -- when the 'andfill was 16 transferred, it alluded to one. The State Department 17 of Public Health can't find one now. That doesn't mean 18 there was not one. We will get back to that discussion 19 later. 20 Was there an engineering -- last question, 21 I believe -- was an engineering report and design and 22 operation plan in existence at the time the ownership 23 was transferred to Waste Services? 24 We don't know. The only allusion to the 25 existence of one is the letter by the State Department BILLINGS REPORTING SERVICE 201 i I 1 1 1 1 I r r 1 of Health, which indicated there, in fact, was one. 2 Now, rebuttals are always disorganized 3 because you jump from subject to subject, and I 4 apologize for it being -- perhaps jumping around. And 5 my clients -- and there are 12 of them here -- all have 6 ideas of what I should say, and have all bit my ears 7 about what I should say, and I probably won't satisfy 8 any of them with what I'm going to say, but I'll try to 9 go through everything that's been said and try to 10 respond to it in some order. 11 Mr. Hayes got up and distributed or showed 12 some picture on the view graph, as I recall, of some 13 dead animals in the landfill, and alluded that those 14 pictures were taken very recently, I think as early as 15 last weekend, or as recently as last weekend. 16 According to the exhibit prepared by the 17 Ashton -Daniels neighborhood and submitted to you as 18 Exhibit AD -46, those same pictures would show the ears 19 of the dead animals were taken in January of 1992. 20 Now, either Mr. Hayes is mistaken or I misunderstood 21 what he said, or the exhibit is wrong. 22 The pictures were, in fact, taken in 23 January of '92. They were taken at a time when the 24 landfill was experimenting with this plastic cover, 25 temporary cover, which I don't believe is still in use. I BILLINGS REPORTING SERVICE .3-d106• I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 And there is no reason to believe the pictures don't 2 accurately depict what was there at the time they were 3 taken. 4 There are some pictures that were taken in 5 '93 in the exhibit that show trash and the fences and 6 snow the operation, and those pictures that were 7 taken in March of '93, you can review on your own time, 8 are not all that objectionable and indicate that the 9 operation is being operated reasonably well, 10 considering the type of operation it is. 11 They -- he alluded to a fire that burned 12 some of the family crop. That was in the paper, 13 newspaper article about that fire, is in your 14 exhibits. That fire was not caused by the landfill as 15 a landfill. That fire was caused when -- I think it 16 was Mr. Len Keirnes was doing some weed burning, which 17 everybody does. 18 And to my knowledge, in the county, there 19 are at least three or four 20 attributed to weed burning 21 burning sometimes gets out 22 things. That weed burning 23 damaged the crop, and 24 was fully compensated 25 I get the traffic accidents a year along the roads. Weed of control and damages did get out of control and the Telep family, I understand, for that damage. impression from hearing a lot of 202 BILLINGS REPORTING SERVICE 931061 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 people in the neighborhood -- and I might add that 2 includes people who have generally spoken in favor of 3 Waste Services -- that they don't like landfills. They 4 don't like a landfill in their neighborhood. 5 They basically take two approaches to that, 6 however. One group says, Close it. One group says, Be 7 careful. One group says, Let's be orderly, let's be 8 responsible, let's close it in an orderly fashion. 9 I would submit neither one of those groups, 10 if you were to have an application for a landfill, 11 would come in here and do handstands. But there really 12 are two approaches. One, I submit, is irresponsible, 13 and one is not. 14 And those suggested by the Spomers and 15 others who, in fact, live downstream or downgradient 16 happen to be the more responsible response. 17 Counsel made a lot of arguments to you 18 about the impact or failure to have a design and 19 operations plan. Now -- and essentially argues that 20 this landfill has been void, ab initio, been void since 21 it started, okay, because there is no design and 22 operations plan. Never was one, according to him. I 23 don't think that's the law. 24 Another thing I would tell you is that you 25 have an attorney sitting with you, and you have an 203 0 BILLINGS REPORTING SERVICE b S )6S 1 204 1 1 1 I 1 1 I I I r 0 I 1 1 1 attorney sitting with you and he has a bunch more 2 upstairs, and they know the law. And I am sure you 3 will get your advice from them, and I would recommend 4 you do so. 5 So the arguments I make or the arguments 6 that counsel for the neighborhood make will ultimately 7 be deciphered by Mr. Morrison, and he will tell you 8 what you can and cannot do with respect to these 9 proceedings. 10 I'll submit to you that the administrative 11 proceedings that took place in 1971 are entitled to a 12 presumption of regularity. That presumption carries 13 until a substantial body of evidence to the contrary is 14 presented. You cannot prove a negative. 15 The certificate of designation was issued. 16 It was issued in October of 1971, after a hearing held 17 in September of 1971. The resolution was prepared and 10 signed by the County Commissioners on the same date. 19 That certificate of designation and that use permit has 20 been in continuous use for over 20 years. It has been 21 back before this body on at least five occasions. 22 No one has questioned the validity of that 23 certificate of designation, and nobody has questioned 24 the validity of this land use in all of these years. 25 And I would submit to do so now and to use that as a 1 BILLINGS REPORTING SERVICE 921061 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 precursor for shutting the landfill is wrong legally, 2 and it's wrong morally, and it's wrong ethically. 3 The statements made by the presenters at 4 the meeting in 1971 do not constitute a condition. 5 The conditions are in the resolution. The fact that 6 someone said they were going to grade it a certain way, 7 the fact they thought it might be used for an irrigated 8 farm, the fact they thought it might close in 15 years, 9 all of those things are statements made in a hearing. 10 They are not conditions on the use of this land. The 11 conditions are contained in the resolution. 12 And if you are not convinced of that, if 13 you are not convinced about the attitude of the Weld 14 County Commissioners in 1971, bless them, I commend 15 to you to read the letter of Ralph Waldo dated 16 December 14, 1971, addressed to his clients. He 17 appeared at the hearing in 1971. He represented the 18 opposition to the landfill. 19 On December 14, 1971, he wrote a letter to 20 his clients and said, I have tried tc get the County 21 Commissioners to put conditions on this operation. 22 They refuse. Now, it wasn't like they weren't 23 approached to put conditions on. It was not as if 24 conditions weren't suggested. They were. 25 What came out of that is the resolution 205 BILLINGS REPORTING SERVICE 9:11.06ft 206 I 1 I 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 that's before you. It contains no conditions, save 2 the two. Courts do not apply laws retroactively. 3 Administrative agencies do not apply laws 4 retroactively. 5 Mr. Mowry stated he can't give a legal 6 opinion. He gave an opinion in a letter to the 7 neighborhood counsel this year that this landfill was 8 grandfathered. 9 MR. HOBBS: Objection. He did not. I 10 would like to respond to that. 11 MR. ROY: The letter was from Mr. Austin 12 Buckingham to Mr. Hanson, not Mr. Mowry. I stand 13 corrected, and I apologize. 14 MR. HOBBS: I would like to explain. 15 MR. ROY: If that didn't grandfather it, 16 the legislation in 1991 did. There is no ambiguity in 17 the permit, so one need not look for an ambiguity. 18 The neighborhood would like you to revisit 19 1971. They would like you to rehear this application 20 20 years later. You cannot do that. At that hearing, 21 a representative of the State Department of Health 22 recommended approval. His -- the text of his remarks 23 are before you two or three times over. You can read 24 it. 25 A great deal has been said about an I BILLINGS REPORTING SERVICE cla‘106i. J+J 1 207 1 I 1 i I 1 1 I 1 1 i 1 I e 1 1 1 expansion proposal. The proposal that's before you is 2 not an expansion proposal. I have not studied it in 3 detail. My clients advise me it is, in fact, a 4 reduction over what could be done on that site as it's 5 presently certificated. 6 There has been a lot of argument by counsel 7 that we are seeking to avoid enforcement of Subtitle D. 8 The contrary is true. If we wanted to avoid the impact 9 of Subtitle D, we would close the landfill now under 10 State regulations, close it with the remedial action 11 required by the State. 12 Those requirements and regulations are 13 substantially below those which we will face if the 14 landfill remains open after October of 1993 and 15 Subtitle D comes into effect. 16 There are lots of other things that are 17 missing if we close it before Subtitle D comes into 18 effect. Financial assurance is missing. Financial 19 post -closure care is omitted. All of those things, 20 this operator is not trying to avoid; he is, indeed, 21 willing and able to undertake. 22 As a matter of fact, in meetings with my 23 clients, I asked them, Why ton't you just close it? I 24 mean, there are business reasons for keeping it open, 25 obviously. Why not close it? Then you don't have to BILLINGS REPORTING SERVICE ✓: X1061. e 1 1 I 1 1 i I 1 1 put up money to financially ensure 30 years of 2 post -closure maintenance. You don't have to do 3 remedial action for the next 30 years and guarantee it 4 financially. You can close in accordance with the 5 existing regulations, which is cheaper and has a lot 6 less exposure. 7 They would prefer to continue to operate 8 it. They would prefer to be responsible. They would 9 prefer to close it in due course. They would prefer 10 to close it in accordance with the most modern 11 restrictions and regulations, and not those currently 12 in effect. 13 The allusion was made that we would like to 14 avoid a public hearing and we did so in the SFLIC case 15 and, therefore, we've got some sort of hidden agenda 16 and are trying to pull the wool over your eyes. 17 I don't think anybody in Waste Management 18 underestimates your sophistication or underestimates 19 your ability to require us to meet whatever 20 requirements there are. And we are certainly not 21 trying to pull the wool over your eyes and have no 22 hidden agendas that have not already been disclosed, 23 including what happened in the FSLIC case. 24 Mr. Megyesy is here, was counsel to Waste 25 Management in that case. He advises me in that case 208 1 BILLINGS REPORTING SERVICE 209 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 Arapahoe County didn't want to have a public hearing. 2 The County Commissioners did not want a hearing, and 3 the issue was, Was a hearing required, and the answer 4 was, No, it was not. And Waste Management in that case 5 aligned itself with the Arapahoe County Commissioners. 6 Had the Arapahoe County Commissioners 7 wanted a public hearing, Waste Services would have been 8 there, or Waste Management would have been there. It 9 was the commissioners who did not want a hearing. 10 The question or the issue has been 11 addressed that this landfill cannot comply with 12 Subtitle A -- and this is by the university students -- 13 cannot comply. Umpteen landfills are going to close in 14 the next five years because they can not comply. Waste 15 Management believes this landfill can comply. Waste 16 Management believes this landfill will comply. 17 Waste Management is willing to put its 18 money where its mouth is and make it comply. And I 19 would suggest to you that that is better for the 20 neighborhood than the alternatives which have been 21 suggested. 22 If the landfill is continued, permitted to 23 continue to operate, you will have closure with four 24 feet of cover, compacted in accordance with Federal 25 standards, raised according to Federal standards, BILLINGS REPORTING SERVICE 1 210 a 1 1 1 1 1 e 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 permitability in accordance with Federal standards of 2 the cap. You will have post -closure maintenance, and 3 you will have financial assurance of closure, 4 post -closure and corrective action. 5 You will have remedial action by the 6 operator for the existing problems. And you will have 7 Subtitle D compliance, in all its glory. A lot of 8 people have talked to you today who inherited their 9 land or received their land, one or another, through 10 their families. I suggest we do not inherit the land 11 from our parents. We hold the land in trust for our 12 children. 13 To shut this landfill down in its present 14 condition violates that trust. You have -- and your 15 counsel will advise you as to what: your alternatives 16 are -- you have the right to not find probable cause, 17 which we believe has not been shown. 18 You can continue these proceedings until 19 some other time in the future, after you have had a 20 chance to review the plans that have been submitted to 21 you. But even if you find a violation has occurred, I 22 would commend you to the language of the regulations 23 and to the statement of your counsel when this started, 24 Does the violation warrant a show cause hearing? Do 25 the violations you've heard warrant a show cause BILLINGS REPORTING SERVICE 3-1061 1 211 I I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I 1 I 1 I I 1 hearing? 2 I suggest they don't, even if you find them 3 to exist. You are not locked into a show cause hearing 4 by virtue of having this hearing. Your flexibility is 5 significant. And we would suggest, A, there is no 6 evidence to support probable cause. 7 We would suggest, two, all the evidence 8 that might suggest probable cause, we produced, we 9 voluntarily disclosed, and made available to all other 10 relevant officials. And three, if you think there was 11 evidence for probable cause, you have many options 12 short of a show cause hearing, and we would suggest 13 that you exercise one or more of those options. 14 Do you have any questions? Sorry to ramble 15 and skip around. 16 MS. HARBERT: Are there any questions for 17 Mr. Roy? 18 I guess I have a question, and that is, 19 in -- we have not seen your remediation plan, had the 20 chance to look it over. 21 MR. ROY: I understand that. 22 MS. HARBERT: How long a period of time 23 would it take to do whatever is in the remediation 24 plan? What time period is considered in that? 25 MR. BUTLER: The pilot scale proposed will BILLINGS REPORTING SERVICE 9-146° 1 1 1 1 1 1 i I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 take between four to six months as addressed in our 2 remediation measures. Once that pilot test is done, we 3 will evaluate the success of it and then determine how 4 to expand it and what additional time will be needed 5 for additional cleanup along that very small area south 6 of the current landfill. 7 MS. HARBERT: And what constitutes this 8 pilot program? I mean, you can't go into detail, I 9 realize, but what are you going to do to put this pilot 10 program into operation? 11 MR. BUTLER: What we are going to do is 12 install a technique we discussed earlier today, called 13 air sparging. 14 MS. HARBERT: All right. 15 M.R. BUTLER: This involves putting in a 16 well where we inject air into the shallow groundwater. 17 We funnel it in. We have monitoring wells that will be 18 installed, or use existing ones to measure its 19 effectiveness. We will be taking monitoring data and 20 will be monitoring not only water quality, but the 21 equipment that's bubbling in, what the rates are, 22 pressures, what works, what doesn't work with that 23 particular aquifer's characteristics. 24 MS. HARBERT: Is that basically what you 25 described this morning is your pilot plan? 212 1 BILLINGS REPORTING SERVICE 213 1 2 3 MR. BUTLER: Yes, ma'am MS. HARBERT: Okay. MR. ROY: There is a second aspect of that, 4 and that is the improvement of the drains north of the 5 site. 6 Leonard, do you know how the drains north 7 of the site are reduced to lower the ground table, when 8 those can or will be installed? 9 MR. BUTLER: The second part, in the 10 interim measures that's addressed specifically in the 11 development plan, is the enhancement of the French 12 drain. That work, as proposed in our amended 13 application, would presumably be worked through review 14 by the Weld County Health Department, State Health 15 Department. 16 Depending upon that review and that 17 process, we would be preparsd to do it at the 18 appropriate time. If we could get through it early, we 19 would like to do it this summer. If we have to go 20 through what I believe is, as Glen Mowry indicated 21 earlier a 180 -day process, because of weather and other 22 constraints, it may be '94 before it can be put in. 23 MS. HARBERT: Okay. Lee, I have a question 24 for you, and that is, Do we have a letter of credit or 25 any financial surety right now, that the landfill would BILLINGS REPORTING SERVICE J:J�Cit I I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 be closed properly? 2 MR. MORRISON: No. The current Federal 3 Subtitle D regulations and proposed regulations -- and 4 our two or three most recent permits all have those 5 provisions -- but this site and others of its era do 6 not. And the closure provisions under existing State 7 regulations are fairly short, nonspecific as to how a 8 closure is to occur. 9 MS. HARBERT: Okay. I guess what my 10 question is, is if we found them in violation at a show 11 cause hearing, who would bear the expense of cleaning 12 up the landfill? 13 MR. MORRISON: Well -- 14 MS. HARBERT: I mean -- 15 MR. MORRISON: Well, I think our position 16 would be they would still be bearing the expense. 17 However, to some extent, it depends on whether this 18 stays as a solid waste site or if it is categorized as 19 a CERCLIS cleanup site. It changes the rules for under 20 which responsible parties my have to contribute to the 21 cleanup. 22 So I don't think in either case that they 23 lose their responsibility. But current regulations, in 24 terms of how it's cleaned up, if it's under the solid 25 waste regulations, are very sketchy. 214 BILLINGS REPORTING SERVICE 2:106 1 215 I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 MS. HARBERT: Thank you. Are there any 2 other questions? 3 MR. BAXTER: Just a follow-up on that. 4 Then you concur with the contention that if they closed 5 it now, it would be a lot cheaper and a lot -- wouldn't 6 follow near the regulations as if it was kept open and 7 closed later. 8 MR. MORRISON: I'm not going to judge 9 whether it's cheaper or not. There will be more 10 extensive regulations to go into effect in October of 11 this year, either by the State regulations or the 12 Federal, by default. 13 There is some issue as to whether, to the 14 extent those regulations apply to vertical expansion of 15 existing areas. They clearly apply to areas that are 16 greater horizontally from the operations prior to 17 October. But I think, in general, there is much more 18 detailed regulations that will pertain if they continue 19 to operate past that date and expand horizontally. 20 MR. HALL: What would be the grandfathering 21 clause, or whatever you want to call that, of the 22 October '93 rules and regulations as pertaining to this 23 specific issue? 24 MR. MORRISON: Well, there wouldn't be for 25 any new horizontal area. That would require meeting I BILLINGS REPORTING SERVICE 216 1 whatever the State -- the states approve those 2 regulations. There may be some opportunity to continue 3 to operate certain -- in terms of currently filled 4 areas, without full compliance. 5 You don't have to go back in, for instance. 6 At least, you don't have a prima facie requirement that 7 you go back in and line a site that's already been 8 filled. And some of the remediation measures -- and 9 John, you can help me on this -- will come in under 10 certain circumstances and then another time frame in 11 '95. 12 So, again, it's not a black and white. You 13 just can't -- you're not allowed to continue operating 14 any way you want after that period if it's not a 15 horizontal expansion. On the other hand, the 16 requirements are less unless you fit into one of the 17 special categories. 18 One of the debates has been over what 19 category you put, whether there is contact between 20 groundwater and waste, in terms of whether the '95 will 21 provide another critical point. 22 MR. PICKLE: 1996. 23 24 25 MR. MORRISON: '96? MR. PICKLE: Right. MR. MORRISON: Thanks. BILLINGS REPORTING SERVICE 8.x1061 217 r 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 MS. HARBERT: John, do you have anything 2 you will like to add to that? 3 MR. PICKLE: What Lee alluded to is that 4 there are other considerations that come into play in 5 1996 that would toughen up the requirements for sites 6 to qualify to continue operation. 7 One of the debates here was, of course, 8 solid waste in contact with groundwater. And at this 9 point that still is up in the air as to whether that's 10 a regulation or not according to the State. 11 I really think that's the only one that 12 would apply right now. But there are some 13 considerations as far as sites that would prevent 14 operation past October '96. And that's in the Federal 15 guidelines. 16 MS. HARBERT: Any more questions? 17 MR. WEBSTER: Yep. If you were to -- No. 1 18 question. On the extension of height, what do you 19 think you need to go up, or what is your -- 20 MR. ROY: I haven't seen the profiles. 21 It's my understanding that the final sillouette of the 22 facility will not be above, or substantially above the 23 existing grade at the top of the landfill is 5 percent. 24 It's my perception it's going to extend out 25 further, perhaps slightly higher, but we are not 1 BILLINGS REPORTING SERVICE 921061 218 1 talking about substantial height over the land, north 2 edge of the landfill, but that plan will have to speak 3 for itself. I am speaking from what I have been told. 4 I have not seen the plan. 5 MR. WEBSTER: My next question, then, you 6 couldn't answer. How many feet would be necessary to 7 put a proper mound on it and cap it? 8 MR. ROY: Now? 9 MR. WEBSTER: At this point. If you went 10 ahead and started to fill to the low spots and then put 11 on a cap or a mounding situation, so that you would -- 12 MR. ROY: We are talking 12 years. 12 13 years of operation, and that's a lot of dirt to haul 14 in. 15 MR. WEBSTER: 12 years to cap it? 16 MR. ROY: 12 years to get the fill to get 17 the profile to cap it. 18 MS. HARBERT: To get the mound, to put the 19 right drainage mound on it? Is that what you're 20 saying? 21 MR. ROY: 12 to 14 years. I have heard 22 various figures. I think the most authorative is 12 to 23 14 years, depending on how effective recycling is. If 24 recycling is more effective, it will extend the life as 25 much as two years. BILLINGS REPORTING SERVICE 9:1961 219 1 MS. HARBERT: Did you have something, I 1 1 1 r 1 1 r 1 1 2 Mr. Butler? 3 MR. BUTLER: Yes, please. Leonard Butler. 4 I wanted to be very succinct again, given the hour, but 5 to respond directly to your question, Commissioners. 6 What has been discussed here, and 7 specifically that as laid out by Mr. Roy, is, in fact, 8 what we feel is a significant reduction from what was 9 envisioned by Weld County back in their more 10 comprehensive solid waste plan. 11 And that reduction basically accounts for a 12 minimum slope by providing for a significant reduction 13 in what may have been envisioned by the operator and 14 Weld County three or four years ago, and that that, by 15 that reduction, we are looking again, as Mr. Roy 16 pointed out, on the success that we nave with recycling, 17 as well as per capita waste generation rates, of a 18 minimum of 12 years. 19 MR. HALL: A couple questions for John. 20 MR. BUTLER: Excuse me. That was maximum, 21 not minimum. 22 MR. HALL: What is the County's role in the 23 monitoring of the wells and how progress is moving 24 forward and that type of thing, as far as -- 25 MR. PICKLE: As I indicated earlier, up BILLINGS REPORTING SERVICE 220 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 until this May or June we monitored these wells 2 quarterly only for the required constituents, which did 3 not include VOCs. So we discontinued any monitoring of 4 the wells in our lab when Waste Management offered the 5 fact that they had discovered VOCs and suggested that 6 they may be able to find a better lab to do that, which 7 I am sure they can. 8 We can't do VOCs. We do receive and they 9 do submit to us any laboratory results that they do or 10 have conducted. And we've reviewed several from 11 several different labs since -- during this whole 12 process. So they have been open with laboratory 13 results that they've received and send us a copy of 14 those, but we do no monitoring ourselves. 15 MR. HALL: How do you -- I guess this is 16 almost a pointed question -- but how do you assure that 17 those reports or those samples are properly taken? 18 MR. PICKLE: Well, there is a standard 19 process for sampling and a standard chain of custody 20 and the forms are all pretty much standard. I can't be 21 there with the person, so I couldn't sit here and swear 22 to you that every sample was taken in accordance with 23 the care that we would take them, or anybody else. 24 But these laboratories are professional 25 laboratories, and they do have a license and there is, BILLINGS REPORTING SERVICE 0,...1461 221 1 0 i i 1 r 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 in fact, the -- you can take action against the lab if 2 you can prove they fraudulently provided information, 3 and it's quite a hefty fine and, of course, would 4 totally ruin a laboratory. 5 So the assurances remain the economical 6 ones, you know. But the government is just not capable 7 of financially providing that type of service for all 8 the different industries tod,sy. 9 So it's been privatized, but I think 10 there's enough safeguards within the privatization 11 system where it should -- you shouldn't see a lot of 12 any type of fraudulent reporting or that sort of thing. 13 MR. BAXTER: Those labs are involved in 14 taking those samples? The obvious question in 15 everybody's mind, you know, whatever lab you send them 16 to, is where they are taken, who takes them. So those 17 labs are involved in the sampling? 18 MR. PICKLE: In most instances that I've 19 seen reports from Waste Services and Waste Management, 20 the laboratory that conducted, or did the collection, 21 also did the analysis. 22 And I know that when we did the analysis, 23 we also did the collection, too. I think that's fairly 24 standard practice. 25 MR. WEBSTER: Could I ask John a question? BILLINGS REPORTING SERVICE J+r111� t 222 1 If -- let's say that we stay out of the picture, 2 meaning we don't -- we defer or whatever, and the 3 State's findings, by continuing their tests, the State 4 people who were here, and they complete those tests and 5 they deny them a discharge permit, would the State 6 close down the landfill or would they look to us to 7 close down the landfill? 8 MR. PICKLE: That's a legal question. 9 MR. MORRISON: Yeah. The revocation of 10 permits for a solid disposal site is a function of the 11 Board of County Commissioners. 12 MR. WEBSTER: So they will direct us to do 13 it. 14 MR. MORRISON: But the discharge permit is 15 a different issue. It might require -- 16 MR. WEBSTER: Let's say they are out of 17 compliance. Let's not use that particular point. 18 Let's just say that they found contamination in the 19 river and they found contamination of the lakes, and 20 the monitoring wells show satisfactory, as far as 21 pollutants and so forth. They have to direct us to do 22 it? 23 MR. ROY: I think I can give you a 24 practical answer. 25 MR. MORRISON: I would appreciate it if you BILLINGS REPORTING SERVICE 0 '71 nail 4 4.1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 would give them an answer. 2 MR. ROY: The practical answer, the permit 3 that's been applied for, for discharge, relates to the 4 underdrain, the drains into or near Spomer Lake. The 5 Waste Services has already proposed or suggested or 6 discussed with the State installing a treatment 7 facility there 8 released. They 9 rid of the VOCs 10 that would treat that water before it's would basically aerate the water, get before it's discharged. The State's response was, Why do that, 11 because they are naturally disposed of immediately 12 after they 13 14 permit, we 15 16 understand are discharged from the drain. But if they were to deny us a discharge would stop discharging. MR. MORRISON: I think you have to the discharge permit is a different 17 situation. Basically, if you can meet the standards 18 that the State sets for 19 be allowed the permit. 20 setting, whereas -- and the discharge permit, you would It's a matter of standard you can either meet it or you 21 don't, in which case you don't discharge if you can't 22 meet the standards set. 23 Whether they can operate without the 24 ability to have that discharge permit is a judgment 25 they have to make. That's separate. The State is not 223 BILLINGS REPORTING SERVICE 3°106" , a 224 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 going to come in and take over this problem that's on 2 your plate because there's a minimum discharge. 3 MR. ROY: The simple, short answer is, 4 if we are denied a discharge permit, we will stop 5 discharging. 6 MR. WEBSTER: What about let's throw the 7 discharge permit out and use the other violations that 8 the State talks about. 9 MR. MORRISON: Excuse me, Mr. Webster, is 10 that to Mr. Roy or to me? 11 MR. WEBSTER: Yeah. 12 MR. ROY: The discharge we applied for 13 relates to surface water, okay, contamination and 14 discharge. The other matters relate to groundwater 15 contamination, and the highest groundwater table. We 16 have not asked for a permit. We are not -- we are,, 17 according to what we have been told, not in compliance. 18 Our suggestion is to direct that with 19 remediation, which involves upstream diversion of the 20 irrigation water and downstream air injection. Because 21 the VOCs are highly volatile, as soon as they are hit 22 by the air, they will vaporize and come out of the 23 well. That's the first technology we are suggesting be 24 tried. 25 If that technology proves unsatisfactory, I BILLINGS REPORTING SERVICE 1 225 1 I 1 I 1 i I 1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 there are secondary and tertiary techniques that can be 2 applied. 3 MR. HOBBS: Chairperson Harbert -- 4 MS. HARBERT: When Mr. Roy is done. 5 Do you have something that is totally new 6 evidence, or new, that you want to talk about? 7 MR. HOBBS: I want to correct a statement 8 that is very important. 9 MS. HARBERT: Is it totally new material? 10 MR. HOBBS: Yes. 11 MS. HARBERT: Are you sure it's totally new 12 material? 13 MR. HOBBS: In view of what he said, I need 14 to -- at least, before you make a decision, I need to 15 address this. 16 MS. HARBERT: Will you go to the 17 microphone, please. 18 MR. HOBBS: We sat here for almost an hour 19 listening to a legal exchange. I would like to suggest 20 that these questions can only be addressed at a public 21 hearing, and we are prepared to brief these legal 22 issues. 23 But I want to correct a misstatement and, 24 therefore, it's new information which Mr. Roy made, and 25 it's contained on the face of the exhibit that he BILLINGS REPORTING SERVICE .9:106 I 226 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 cited, Austin Buckingham's letter of -- it's marked 2 as AD -48 -- and I would just like to read you one 3 statement from the letter, which was not brought to 4 your attention. 5 "To the Division's knowledge, no design or 6 operations plan has ever been developed for the 7 landfill, nor are any plans of this nature contained in 8 the Division files." Paragraph 2, Page 2 of the 9 Buckingham letter. 10 This is very important. As Mr. Hanson 11 stated, if there is a design operations plan, it 12 controls the operation and the closure. If there is 13 no plan, there was a violation ab initio of your 14 resolution. 15 It is unfair, I believe, of counsel to say 16 the State grandfathered this facility, when the State 17 itself says that there was never any design or 18 operations plan. 19 If there is one -- and he suggested there 20 was one based on the '86 transfer -- then for that 21 reason alone, you need to order the hearing and have 22 the Health Department come and show whether or not 23 there is such a plan, because if there is such a plan, 24 it governs this facility. If there is not, you have no 25 compliance with the land use approval. BILLINGS REPORTING SERVICE ✓106 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 And, again, I don't want to expand this. 2 We are very tired, all of us. They tried the case here 3 on the merits just now in legal arguments. I didn't 4 get a chance to respond. All we are asking for is a 5 hearing. That's the reason for today's meeting. I 6 wish it were not so. 7 I would have preferred to have come here in 8 one fell sweep. That's not how your procedures were 9 set up. We want a chance to brief this and have the 10 evidence here. 11 MS. HARBERT: Let the record show that the 12 person speaking was Greg Hobbs, the attorney for the 13 Ashton -Daniels Neighborhood Association. 14 MR. ROY: That same exhibit, Page 2, dated 15 September 18, 1992: "The Central Weld County Landfill 16 received a Certificate of Designation on October 6, 17 1971. At that time, the state had not promulgated 18 solid waste regulations pursuant to the Statute. 19 Between 1968 (the date the Statute became effective) 20 and 1972, solid waste disposal sites and facilities 21 complied with the minimum standards set forth in the 22 Statute. The minimum standards detailed operational 23 standards, but did not specifically require a design 24 and operations plan. In 1972 regulations were 25 promulgated pursuant to the Statute. That 1972 227 BILLINGS REPORTING SERVICE 931061 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 I 1 regulation set forth the requirement that all landfills 2 with an existing Certificate of Designation were 3 'grandfathered,' that is they were required to meet the 4 minimum standards of section 3, but not the standards 5 of section 4 (which applied to all solid waste disposal 6 sites and facilities that were designated after the 7 effective date of regulation). In 1983, when the 8 regulations were revised to their current form." 9 And then there is the paragraph quoted by 10 counsel. 11 MS. KIRKMEYER: I would like you to address 12 that question of grandfathering, Condition No. 1 on the 13 resolutions. No. 1, any sanitary landfill facilities 14 being installed shall be approved by the State Health 15 Department. 16 MR. ROY: I -- I'm sorry. 17 MR. MORRISON: First, I guess I would 18 remind you that the standards you are dealing with is a 19 fairly minimal one in terms of making a finding that 20 you need to go to the next stage, so that you don't 21 need to make a final determination. 22 And, in fact, any of your findings here are 23 preliminary in nature, only for the purpose of 24 determining whether we go to the show cause. I think 25 you are going to -- I think you are going to have to 228 BILLINGS REPORTING SERVICE 931061 I 229 1 1 I 1 1 i i i 1 weigh evidence that maybe points in two directions. 2 There are statements from Mr. Stoddard on 3 the record that have been presented to you about this, 4 essentially, that this is an okay site. But there are 5 two letters, an exchange of letters that have to do 6 prior to the hearing in, I believe, July of '71, where 7 the -- Mr. Moffat was requested to provide the 8 engineering. He then argued that, you know, he didn't 9 want to go to that expense until he knew whether the 10 site would be approved. 11 There is, of course, this letter that both 12 sides have now quoted from Austin Buckingham. What is 13 clear is, I think the State could have required in 1971 14 that Mr. Moffat submit a complete engineering and 15 design package, because the statute was in effect. 16 And I think you ultimately have to make a 17 judgment whether, when you get to this issue -- and I'm 18 not sure you have to finally resolve it today -- when 19 you get to this issue, was the set of representations 20 and the -- when the commissioners arrived at this 21 conclusion, it has to comply with State Health 22 Department regulations. Was that based on a view that 23 there was something more coming? Was there a planning 24 coming? Or had it already occurred when Mr. Stoddard 25 stood up and said it was an okay site? 1 BILLINGS REPORTING SERVICE 230 1 MS. RIRRMEYER: I guess, to that, I would 2 say, in reading some of the other documentation here in 3 the transcripts, there was supposed to be a plan 4 coming, because it said in the documentation or the 5 transcript that it was supposed to be presented to the 6 Board of Health after that, in 1971, after this initial 7 hearing in September for their adoption of that plan. 8 MR. MORRISON: Well, I'd appreciate -- 9 Mr. Roy, I would appreciate it -- what I am trying to 10 tell you is that, although it is primarily a legal 11 question, you still have some intent to determine. 12 Whether it was, was that the intent? We are not trying 13 to create new standards that aren't shown on this 14 resolution. We are trying to interpret, I believe, the 15 intent of that provision. 16 And I'm not contending that if someone 17 stands up in regulation and says it's only going to be 18 2 feet high, or stands up at a hearing and says the 19 mound will only be 2 feet high, that they are bound to 20 that. What I am saying is, you are looking at that 21 process of approval and trying to interpret your 22 prior -- your prior Board's resolution, and you're 23 looking at the intent of the Board when they passed 24 that resolution. 25 And that is at least a part -- that part of BILLINGS REPORTING SERVICE :3...,106- I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 it is a factual judgment based on all the records that 2 you have before you. 3 MS. HARBERT: Are there any more questions? 4 MR. BAXTER: Madam Chairman, I would like 5 a clarification, with all respect to the two attorneys 6 out here, that obviously, it's their business to have a 7 vested opinion. I find a legal opinion -- I don't want 8 to put Lee on the spot, but your contention is we don't 9 have to make that initial legal determination right 10 now? That can be saved for a show cause hearing? 11 MR. MORRISON: That's true, because all you 12 need -- I mean, the standard that you have to meet 13 today is a probable cause, which is a reasonable ground 14 for belief in the existence of facts warranting the 15 proceedings complained of. 16 That cuts both ways. If you find probable 17 cause today, that doesn't assure that you will find 18 grounds to revoke in the future. But what I'm saying 19 is, you don't have to determine with finality the facts 20 upon which you base your decision. 21 You need to weigh them and say, Is there 22 grounds to go forward? Are there enough facts that 23 have been laid out to justify having a more complete 24 hearing? 25 MR. BAXTER: Thank you. 231 1 BILLINGS REPORTING SERVICE 931061 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 MS. HARBERT: Do you have anything else? 2 MR. CUNLIFFE: Yes. I guess we would like 3 to explain the position that we took. 4 MS. HARBERT: State your name. It's been a 5 long time since you spoke. 6 MR. CUNLIFFE: Chuck Cunliffe, Weld County 7 Department of Planning Services. 8 We would like to explain the position that 9 we took and, hopefully, it will shed some light on 10 this. Some people have questioned the length of time 11 that we asked for the continuance. The purpose of the 12 hearing today was, as Lee has just explained, to 13 determine whether or not probable cause exists. 14 If you find no probable cause, we can all 15 go home and forget it. If you find probable cause, 16 then the staff looked at three different scenarios, 17 the first one being to continue the probable cause 18 hearing until December 1 of 1993. 19 And in looking at that, that was a 20 three -step process that has been or is consistent with 21 how we've handled probable cause hearings in the past. 22 And the length of time involved requires the six-month 23 review by the State Health Department, which they are 24 required by statute, and also historically have taken 25 the six months. 232 1 BILLINGS REPORTING SERVICE 9:11.06.A. 1'l 1 r 1 1 0 1 I 1 1 1 We then need a minimum of 30 days before 2 the first Planning Commission hearing. And again, we 3 have waited until we actually have in hand the 4 recommendation of the State Health Department on the 5 certificate of designation before we schedule the 6 Planning Commission hearing. 7 Following the Planning Commission hearing, 8 then it's roughly three or four weeks before it comes 9 before the Board of County Commissioners. So that's 10 the date that we looked at, December 1, taking into 11 account that three -step process and the time frame that 12 historically has been there. 13 The other two possibilities which we did 14 not recommend was you could schedule a show cause 15 hearing in a relatively short time frame. The other 16 possibility we looked at was to schedule a show cause 17 hearing. Again, staff would, if the Board so chose 18 that, again, we would recommend the December 1, 1993, 19 hearing date. That allows the amended applications for 20 the special use permit and certificate of designation 21 to follow that time line. 22 And I guess the reason that both the 23 Planning Department and the Health Department felt that 24 that was, I guess, reasonable, is that the remediation 25 plan addressing the problems with groundwater is 233 I BILLINGS REPORTING SERVICE choloss I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 included as a part of that amended application 2 process. 3 So that was the way, I guess, we went about 4 the reasoning behind what we recommended. I don't know 5 if that will help the Board, but again, we would like 6 to stress that has been consistent with what we have 7 done when we have gone to probable cause and the 8 applicant has come forward with an amended application. 9 And we've allowed that or recommended that 10 the application proceed to give him due process to come 11 into compliance, or at least direct the issues that we 12 were attempting to focus on today. 13 MS. HARBERT: Thank you. That gives us a 14 lot of clarification as to what our options are. 15 The time being 5:15, I need to caucus my 16 commissioners up here as to how you want to proceed. 17 Do you want to -- I guess we have three options. We 18 can take a break, we can go on until we finish, or we 19 can recess until tomorrow morning.. So those are our 20 three options, and I guess I need to get some input 21 from you before we go on. 22 MS. KIRKMEYER: I would like to go on until 23 we finish. 24 MR. BAXTER: I'm for going on. 25 MR. WEBSTER: Fine. 234 I BILLINGS REPORTING SERVICE 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 i 1 MS. HARBERT: All right. That's all I need 2 to know. 3 MR. MORRISON: Madam Chairman, I have two 4 points to clarify. 5 (Discussion off the record.) 6 MR. MORRISON: One is the State is not 7 required to take, I think, 150 days, but they 8 inevitably seem to, so . . 9 MR. CUNLIFFE: I guess -- we checked with 10 the State, with Gle:. Mowry today, and they said they 11 had to take 180 days. 12 MR. MORRISON: That's consistent. They 13 have never done them any more quickly than the time 14 allowed. 15 MR. CUNLIFFE: I think the other thing we 16 need to point out is that that six months could extend 17 if they request additional information. So that's 18 looking at the minimums, with no problems. 19 MR. MORRISON: The other clarificaticn from 20 my statement, when we were talking about what would 21 happen in terms of closure, the Subtitle D regulations 22 do apply to landfills currently operating with respect 23 to additional closure requirements more strict than 24 what the State currently requires. 25 So they -- that's the one, if you don't 235 1 BILLINGS REPORTING SERVICE 9A06A. 1 1 1 r 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 e 1 1 1 e 1 1 1 close before October of this year, you still have to 2 comply with regulations, closure requirements. 3 It's an additional closure requirement, not 4 post -closure monitoring, not posting collateral, but in 5 terms of how you go about closure. 6 MS. HARBERT: So what you're saying is, if 7 we would have a show cause hearing before October 1, 8 their requirements wouldn't be as stringent as if we 9 had a show cause hearing after October 1. 10 MR. MORRISON: If they were revoked before 11 versus revoked afterwards, yes. My answer to that 12 question is the same. It's just that I neglected to 13 advise you, in Section 258.6(a)2 of the Subtitle D 14 regulations does require some additional physical means 15 of closure, even though they cease operation before the 16 October date. 17 MS. HARBERT: I guess, is the Board ready 18 to make a decision or -- 19 MS. KIRKMEYER: Do we have any more 20 questions? 21 MS. HARBERT: Are there any more questions? 22 MS. KIRKMEYER: I would move the Board of 23 County Commissioners determine that there is probable 24 cause and reasonable grounds to believe that facts 25 exist that Central Weld County Landfill and its owner 236 BILLINGS REPORTING SERVICE 1 1 I 1 I I I 1 I 1 I I I 1 is not in compliance with SUP -116. 2 And why don't we schedule a show cause 3 hearing. I am open for a date here, maybe the first 4 Wednesday in October. 5 MS. HARBERT: I would prefer to take staff 6 recommendation on December 1, but I guess I need to 7 have some input. 8 MS. KIRIQ4EYER: Maybe I should stop my 9 motion that we schedule a show cause hearing and make 10 another motion for the date. i1 MR. WEBSTER: Time to be determined later. 12 MS. KIRKMEYER: We need to do that. 13 MR. BAXTER: Madam Chairman, could I ask 14 Chuck a question? Does that present a problem you can 15 see, if it goes before December? 16 MR. CUNLIFFE: If it goes before December, 17 then the State may not have completed its review. 18 Regardless of what happens here today, we are 19 processing the amended applications for Special Use 20 Permit 116 and CD -26, so that will continue on in the 21 process. 22 But you're looking at six months from today 23 before we get any kind of a response back from the 24 State Health Department, unless they ask for additional 25 information from Waste services. 237 U BILLINGS REPORTING SERVICE 1 1 1 1 I I i 1 1 MR. WEBSTER: That's terrible. I'm 2 irritated with the State. So that's my problem. 3 MS. HARBERT: That's not helping us make 4 our decision at all. If we could have a State 5 recommendation back next month, well, it would 6 certainly help us, but there's no way that we can do 7 that. 8 And I feel that we at least need their 9 input into this. And if we can't -- if we can't get 10 theirs back for six months, and then it takes what, 11 approximately four weeks after that to post -- 12 MR. CUNLIFFE: Get to the Planning 13 Commission. 14 MS. HARBERT: -- do the hearings and so on, 15 we are to December 1, and I think that's why Chuck 16 recommended that. I think our hands are somewhat tied 17 in a way, if we want the State's input on it. 18 MS. KIRKMEYER: I guess, first of all, 19 Chuck is talking about an amended certificate of 20 designation plan or application, and there's also the 21 remedial plan. So are they one and the same? 22 MR. CUNLIFFE: They are an element of the 23 application. 24 MS. KIRKMEYER: So they could rule on the 25 remedial plan in any length of time? They don't have 238 BILLINGS REPORTING SERVICE 8:106 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 any deadline or anything of that nature? 2 MR. CUNLIFFE: That's true. But, again, 3 historically, they have taken as much time as they 4 choose to, and Mr. Mowry indicated in his testimony 5 earlier, there is no set deadline, so they don't have 6 to have it out in six months. They can take seven 7 months or eight months. 8 MS. KIRKMEYER: Or indefinitely? 5 MR. CUNLIFFE: That's right. 10 MS. KIRKMEYER: If we don't set a deadline, 11 that can keep them going indefinitely? 12 MR. CUNLIFFE: Weill, again, the 13 remediation plan is part of the application for use by 14 special review and amended CD. That's locked into the 15 180 days, so they have to have something back to us. 16 So we're assuming they will have a response back to us 17 in the six months on the remediation plan. 18 MR. MORRISON: The other side of that, 19 though, is, if you go to th3 next level, I think the -- 20 that I've heard Waste Management say that that 21 remediation plan portion of the permit application goes 22 to show how they are going to resolve any violations. 23 So you want, hopefully, to have the State 24 comments on that plan, whether you do the show cause 25 first or not. I mean, you can -- you know, the fact is 239 1 BILLINGS REPORTING SERVICE '3:31.061 240 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 you can proceed with the show cause. You are not 2 precluded from doing that in an earlier order, or 3 setting that and not -- and without knowing exactly 4 when the permit might be heard. 5 MS. HARBERT: Well, we can always set a 6 show cause hearing date, too, and if we don't have the 7 information we want, we can continue it without having 8 the hearing. That's what you're saying? 9 MR. MORRISON: Yes. 10 MS. HARBERT: I mean, if we set it for 11 October 15 and we don't have the information we need, 12 we can gather it October 15 and continue it to whenever 13 we want to? 14 MR. MORRISON: Yes. 15 MS. HARBERT: I mean, that's an example. 16 MR. MORRISON: Yes. 17 MS. KIRKMEYER: Carol, could you give me a 18 date in October around the 15th? 19 MS. HARDING: 13th. 20 MS. KIRKMEYER: I would add that to my 21 motion, and schedule show cause hearing on October 13, 22 1993. 23 MR. WEBSTER: Second. 24 MS. HARBERT: It's been moved by Barbara 25 Kirkmeyer and seconded by Bill Webster to schedule a BILLINGS REPORTING SERVICE 0i z4.'16 i 1 241 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 show cause hearing for October 13, 1991. That is a 2 Wednesday, at 10:00 in the morning. 3 Is there any further discussion? 4 MR. BAXTER: I just have a question maybe 5 of legal counsel, and maybe Chuck, whoever is involved 6 in this. This in no way hampers going ahead with the 7 amended permit, or be construed as putting a damper on 8 that? 9 MR. MORRISON: Not if that's your -- I 10 mean, that should not. It could affect -- if, under 11 the scenario that the existing permits are revoked, you 12 could still hold a hearing on the new application. It 13 might change the framework under which it's judged 14 because some of these grandfathering provisions would 15 evaporate. 16 But it wouldn't prevent -- and you could 17 revoke, could have revoked it today. It wouldn't 18 prevent the application and the processing. And as 19 long as it's a complete application and one that isn't 20 prohibited in some fashion in the regulations, I think 21 we have to process it. 22 MS. HARBERT: Any other discussion? 23 MR. HALL: It seems like, to me, though, 24 that the best possible solution to this whole process 25 is to review the use by special review -- or permit by 1 BILLINGS REPORTING SERVICE 1 1 I I I i 1 1 use of special review amendment process, and I guess 2 I'm not convinced totally that we have probable cause 3 in this situation. 4 My preference would be to allow a 5 continuation of this probable cause hearing. 6 MS. KIRKMEYER: I guess, to that, I would 7 answer, not only has Waste Management stated they feel 8 there is a violation. Whether it's minor or they think 9 it could be remedied, it's still a violation. 10 Also, the Attorney General's letter of 11 March 5, 1993, that concurs with the Colorado 12 Department of Health that there is a violation of 13 2.1.4. And our own Weld County Health Department also 14 cited the operation for four violations that they still 15 feel they are not in compliance with. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 MS. HARBERT: Roll call, please. MS. HARDING: George Baxter. MR. BAXTER:: Aye. MS. HARDING: Dale Hall. MR. HALL: No. MS. HARDING: Barbara Kirkmeyer. MS. KIRKMEYER: Yes. MS. HARDING: Bill Webster. MR. WEBSTER: Yes. MS. HARDING: Connie Harbert. 242 BILLINGS REPORTING SERVICE f ;>4R6• ., 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 MS. HARBERT: Yes. 2 Thank you. I have to terminate the 3 meeting. I forgot we started at 9:00 this morning. At 4 this time, there being no other business to come before 5 the regular Board of County Commissioners of Weld 6 County, I declare us adjourned. 7 I would like to say that I thank each and 8 every one of you for spending the day with us. It's 9 been a long day for both us and you, both, and the 10 commissioners, also. But things like this are really 11 necessary, and it's what makes our democracy work. 12 Thank you very much for coming. 13 (Proceedings concluded at 5:30 p.m.) 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 243 I BILLINGS REPORTING SERVICE 93'1.06 244 I 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 STATE OP COLORADO ) ) ss. 2 COUNTY OF WELD ) REPORTER'S CERTIFICATE 3 I, Barbara Billings, do hereby certify that 4 I am a Certified Shorthand Reporter and Notary Public 5 within the State of Colorado. 6 I further certify that these proceedings 7 were taken in shorthand by me at the time and place 8 herein set forth and were thereafter reduced to 9 typewritten form, and that the foregoing constitutes a 10 true and correct transcript. 11 I further certify that I am not related to, 12 employed by, nor of counsel for any of the parties or 13 attorneys herein, nor otherwise interested in the 14 result of the within action. 15 In witness whereof, I have affixed my 16 signature and seal this 8th of May, 1993. 17 My commission expires April 11, 1994. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 B&rbara�ngCSR, .c PR -CM 710 - 11th Avenue, Suite 106 Greeley, Colorado 80631 1 BILLINGS REPORTING SERVICE 931061 245 1 BILLINGS REPORTING & VIDEO, INC. 2 710 - 11th Avenue, Suite 106 Greeley, Colorado 80631 3 (303) 356-3306 4 5 PLEASE ATTACH TO YOUR COPY OF THE TRANSCRIPT OF 6 THE CENTRAL WELD/GREELEY-MILLIICN LANDFILL HEARING 7 8 9 10 THIS TRANSCRIPT HAS BEEN FILED WITH: 11 Clerk to the Board, Weld County Commissioners 12 On approximately the 10th day of May, 1993. 13 14 cc: All Counsel 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 BILLINGS REPORTING SERVICE 001061 Wolk Watt. Etatey:c Attorneys At Law 1775 Sherman Street • Suite 1300 Denver, Colorado 80203 (303) 861-1963 • Fax: (303) 832-4465 Ext. 123 May 19, 1993 Ms. Linda Shearman Colorado Board of Health 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South Denver, Colorado 80222-1530 Re: Supplement to Our Letter of May 17, 1993 Proposed Solid Waste Regulations Board of Health Hearing May 19, 1993, Fort Collins 9: 36 Dear Ms. Shearman: This letter supplements our letter of May 17, 1993, and we ask that both letters be included in the record of your consideration regarding the proposed solid waste regulations. We ask the Board of Health to adopt the proposal we made in our May 17 letter and ask you to remove the "grandfathering" provision that has been placed into proposed section 3.1.10 at the request of Waste Management Inc. which owns and operates the Central Weld County landfill. By letter of December 21, 1992, attached, Mr. Roger Doak and Mr. Glenn Mallory notified Waste Management Inc. that the Central Weld County landfill was in violation of section 2.1.4 of the existing regulations prohibiting water pollution and that "solid wastes have been placed into ground water at this facility", p.4, letter of December 21, 1992. Waste Management's response of February 4, 1993, attached, included a proposal to reword proposed section 3.1.10 of the solid waste management regulations to provide that "The operation of sites and facilities that place waste into groundwater after the effective date of these regulations is prohibited", p.3, letter of February 4, 1993. The March 30, 1993, draft of the proposed regulations contains, word for word, Waste Management Inc.'s grandfather provision. This provision was and is intended by Waste Management to remove legal requirements applicable to the Central Weld County facility and render unenforceable representations made by the applicant in 1971 in the course of obtaining the certificate of designation from the Weld County Commissioners for its siting. Exh;bd- /1/ cc : dncr_, /L, N.L 901061 Waste Management's attempt to repeal protections for the environment and the public should be soundly and thoroughly rejected by the Board of Health, and section 3.1.10 should be revised to include the language we proposed in our May 17 letter. A central issue in the September 22, 1971, certificate of designation hearing before the Weld County Commissioners was whether trash would contact groundwater and cause water pollution. Residents of the area who had farmed for generations testified that the landfill could not be operated successfully at the site because of the high groundwater table. The applicant's response was that it would be bound by the proposed rules being considered by the State Board of Health at that time which, when adopted, would require a design, engineerand that water ing and operations plan, that trash would not contact g pollution would not occur at the site: "Also, the Department is required to develop and promulgate rules and regulations pertaining to the engineering design and operation. These are to be presented to the Board of Health at their regular meeting in October for adoption." Hearing Transcript of September 22, 1971, p. 5 (Earl Moffat for the Applicant) "Well, Ralph, like I explained a while ago, we're so bound down and so tight now by regulations, supervised by qualified engineers of the state, Norm Parson, that, sure there's nothing there that we can do that would be, that will make, a problem..." Hearing Transcript of September 22, 1971, p. 7 (Earl Moffat for the Applicant) Orville Stoddard of the State Health Department assured the Commissioners and the public that if water pollution occurred the operation would be shut down: "The important thing that we will be looking at, of course, is to make sure that water pollution does not occur from this operation in any way, shape or form. Hearing Transcript of September 22, 1971, pp. 30-31 (Orville Stoddard for State Department of Health) After hearing these representations, the Weld County Commissioners included the following provision in the resolution which authorized issuance of the certificate of designation: 2. Ex. /d 931106'. 1. That any sanitary landfill facility to be installed shall be approved by the state Department of Health. Resolution of October 6, 1971, Weld County Commissioners Having received the Certificate of Designation, the owners and operators of the Central Weld County landfill did not file a design, engineering and cperations plan and did not receive the approval of the Health Department prior to commencing operations at the site. In a letter to Kent Hanson of September 18, 1992, Austin Buckingham of the State Department of Health stated that: "To the Division's knowledge, no design or operations plan has ever been developed for the landfill, nor are any plans of this nature contained in the Division files". Letter of Austin Buckingham to Kent Hanson, September 18, 1992, p. 2 waste Management's response is that the facility was grandfathered from the State's design, engineering, operations plan requirement and any need to obtain the approval of the State Health Department prior to operations, despite the specific assurances of the applicant that it would be bound by the State regulations which were in draft form in October of 1971 and were subsequently adopted in February of 1972. The Weld County Commissioners have scheduled a public hearing, after finding probable cause for revocation of the certificate of designation, to be held October 13, 1993, regarding compliance with the condition of its October 6, 1971, resolution requiring approval by the Health Department. In accordance with C.R.S. 30-20-112, the certificate of designation revocation hearing should also include issues of violation of the State Department of Health regulations, but Waste Management Inc. is seeking to exclude the Department and citizens of Weld County from bringing these matters into the certificate of designation revocation hearing. what the State of Colorado and the citizens of Weld County face is a concerted attempt by Waste Management to continue operations at site which is unsuitable for a landfill operation, to grandfather the operation from all applicable representations, standards, and legal requirements, and to change the legal requirements applicable to the site. 3. Ey. . /it 3 • • We implore you to issue regulations and orders which require closure and remediation of facilities like the Central Weld Sanitary landfill. Sincerely, d Gregory J. Hobbs, Jr. for Hobbs, Trout & Raley, P.C. cc: Dr. Patricia Nolan Weld County Commissioners Mr. Lee Morrison Mr. John Pickle Ashton -Daniels Neighorhood Association 93106'?.. DEC -23-82 WED 12:48 • • P. 05 Ex. / d Bill Hedberg Central Weld Sanitary Una 11 December 21, 1992 page 4/5 6. Table 5-1 In the 'Groundwater Monitoring Plan for Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, Weld County, Colorado" is inadequate. The following parameters shall be added to Table 5-1: all 34 volatile organic compounds (VOCs) included in the llydrogeological and Geotechnieal Characterization for the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill; carbon disulfide; dichiorodltluorotnethane and trichloroiluoromethane; radionuclides; chromium; barium and nickel Table 5-1 shall be changed to read "Groundwater and Surface Water Parameter Litt Central Weld Sanitary Landfill." 7. All piezometers shall bo monitored for depth to wound data d watt sad er. onitor d quarterly shall be conducted during each sampling to the Division. 8. The Division requests that those constituents identified from monitoring well GWMW-5N (target parameter list) be analyzed on a monthly basis. Sampling shall commence during January 1.993 and continue for twelve (12) consecutive months. Rimtine quarterly sampling of this well shall continue for the established suite of parameters. If additional constituents are identified duxlag quarnrly sampling they will be added to the target list The Division will evaluates sample frequency and parameters after completion of this sampling schedule. C. AREAS OF NON-COMP11ANCE 1. Central Weld Sanitary Landfill has contaminated the ground water. This is a violation of subsection 2.1.4 of the Regulations. The Regulations dearly state a site and facility operated as a sanitary landfill shall prevent water pollution. Please provide a corrective sugion pica which addresses the contamination issues on and off site. Z Solid wastes have been. placed into ground water at this facility. The Purpose,• Scope and ApplicabBlty as defined in Section 3 of the proposed revised State's Solid 'Waste Regulations, defuses standards for new landfills, existing landfill% and lateral expansions. Subsection 3.1.11 (draft of November 5, 1992) states landfills shall not place wastes below or into surface water or groundwater_" DEC -23-92 WED 1248 • • P. 06 Bill Hedberg Central Weld Sanitary Landfill December 21, 1992 page 5/5 Please be aware, the Divisicn fully expects the proposed revised Solid Waste Regulations will become effective in the very near future. At that time Central Weld Sanitary Landfill will be in violation of area 'C, point #2 as detailed above. As the owner and operator of this facility, Waste Soviets Corporation, is notified that the areas of non-cornpiiance detalbcd above are a public nuisance. Please be advised that the te and of f these violations and protect the public health andaenvironmencs� to obtain correction These conclude the Divisions comments concerning issues raised about Central Weld Sanitary LandfilL Please =Toad to the issues detailed vin questions a comprehensive docplease feel Ltument within two weeks of the receipt of this letter. If you have any to contact me at 303.692-3437. Sincerely, f Rego Doak Geologist Solid Waste Section Hazardous Materials and Waste Management Division Glenn p'. Mnicry Section Leader Solid Waste Section Hazardous Materials and Waste Management Division cc: J. Pickle, Weld Ccrmty Health, Department L Morrison. Weld County Athistant Attorney A. Scheere, Waste Management of North America 8. Taylor, OR, WOOD L- Perrault, Attorney General's Office Weld County Depsrtrnent of Planning Weld County Con zoissioners Flle: SW/WLD/aN/Correspondence Ex. /9 Mr. Glenn F. Mallor. February 4, 1993 Page 3 • section 3.1.9 This standard of 'emphasizing favorable geologic conditions over engineered Improvements of marginal geologic conditions" Is subjective in content and has been difficult to define for many years in public hearings and in litigation. No definition exists for the regulators or the regulated community. it is recommended that given incorporation of the more restrictive Subtitle 0 standards into Colorado's regulations, this subjective requirement be deleted. Section 3.1.10 Since this is an operational, rather than a locational, standard, we recommend that v it be moved to Section 3.3. This standard requires clarification to Indicate that la ent—c f waste into groundwater Is prnhihitort / We recommend —that sewn sentence of Section 3.1.10 be reworded to state that 'The operation of sites and facilities that place waste Into groundwater after the effective date of these regulations Is prohibited. As currently drafted, this regulation would penalize owners/operators that identify surface water or groundwater in contact with waste. Only about one-third of the solid waste disposal facilities in Colorado currently monitor groundwater. Facility data may not be available for the remaining sites to ascertain site conditions. Further, historic practices or artificial Influences In the surrounding groundwater table may have caused groundwater to infiltrate waste regardless of past or present waste placement activities. The remainder of the existing unit or lateral expansion of the site may be fined or planned for construction of finer material. Section 7 A definition section regarding terms such as material recovery facility, intermediate processing center and active operating area should be developed for clarification of terms. The following definitions are offered: Material Recovery Facility (MRF): A facility designed to receive and process recyclable materials. intermediate Processing Facili : A facility designed to remove recydabies !nom unprocessed municipal solid waste. Active Ooeratino Area: An area that includes all areas of unloading, balling compacting. storing and out loading. Ex. 6 • P2106' 7 • • Mr. Glenn F. Mallory February 4. 1993 Page 4 Section 7.2.2(A)(6) This section requires truck wheel curbs. Our experience has shown that curbs may be unnecessary if trucks are not permitted to back close to unloading areas. Therefore, this requirement should be more performance related to state 'measures shall be provided to prevent backing Into pits while unloading'. B.3 Groundwater Sampling and Analysis Requirements (258.52) We recommend that the requirement ground water samples shall not be field - filtered prior to laboratory analysis` be deleted in Section B since the previous sentence Indicates: (1) that analytical methods shall be according to Colorado Department of Health guidelines or an EPA approved method; and (2) a proposed rule lifting the ban on field filtering is being considered by EPA. Thank you for the opportunity to submit these comments and participate in the development of the draft Solid Waste Regulations to incorporate Subtitle D requirements. We would appreciate the opportunity to discuss these comments and questions with you further if any clarifications are required prior to the March, 1993 hearing date. Sincerely, Leonard J. Butler, P.E., DEE Vice President - Environmental Management cc: Tom Schweitzer, WMC Bruce Clabaugh, WMC Charles Bayley, WMC LI Subtitle D/Colo. 2.3 5c. /9 ..9:1nc i Kent Hanson, Attorney at Law Central Weld County Landfill September 18, 1992 Page 2 of 3 approval of the plan, the application shall be amended. The regulation does not state that the Certificate of Designation shall be amended. The County must utilize its own discretion or regulation as to whether an amended Certificate of Designation is required for facilities which amend their application, but continue to perform the same type of solid waste disposal. 2. The Central Weld County Landfill received a Certificate of Designation on October 6, 1971. At that time, the state had not promulgated solid waste regulations pursuant to the Statute. Between 1968 (the date the Statute became effective) and 1972, solid waste disposal sites and facilities complied with the minimum standards set forth in the Statute. The minimum standards detailed operational standards, but did not specifically require a design and operations plan. In 1972 regulations were promulgated pursuant to the Statute. That 1972 regulation set forth the requirement that all, landfills with an existing Certificate of Designation were ' grandfathered,' that is they were required to meet the minimum standards of section 3, but not the standards of section 4 (which applied to all solid waste disposal sites and facilities that were designated after the effective date of the regulation). In 1983, when the regulations were revised to their current form. The Division concurs, and certainly Subtitle D will require, that the Central Weld County Landfill must develop an enhanced design and operations plan to bring the facility up to current standards. To the Division's knowledge. no design or operations plan has ever been developed for the landfill, nor are any plans of this nature contained in the Division files. 3. It is true, that ground water contamination has been identified off -site. The County has wisely chosen to allow the facility to take over the ground water monitoring activities at the landfill. The Central Weld County Landfill has expanded the list of ground water analytes, and through this effort has revealed the presence of volatile organics in the round water. h ld ear Associates has recently submitted a hyrogeologic 8 and gel characterization report detailing and summarizing recent investigations. The Division is in the process of reviewing the report, and will work with Weld County and Waste Services Corporation to obtain a satisfactory resolution to the ground water contamination issue. 4. Waste Services Corporation does intend to submit (and is currently in process Kent Hanson, Attorney at Law Central Weld County Landfill September 18, 1992 Page 3 of 3 of developing) a comprehensive site development plan, and a design and he in operations at the erations plans. Central Division CenntralWeld County Landfill during this interim period. 5. finalDivision existing elevation of the landfill may not exceed the adjacentirement or land eement that the and surface. Hopefully, this letter responds to your issues. The Division is interested am in bringing sue gc 1 and will pursue the ground water contamination identified at the site, y up to the State's standards. Thank -you for your letter and for the extension you were able to grant, so that an adequate response could be prepared. may be contacted at this office if you have any additional questions or concerns. erely Austin N. Buckingham Geologist Hazardous Materials and Waste Management Division cc: B. Hedberg, Central Weld County Landfill B. Keirnes, Waste Services Corporation G. Kennedy, Weld County Commissioners L. Morrison, Weld County Attorney D. O' Sadnick, Golder Associates J. Pickle, Weld County Health Department A. Scheere, Waste Management of North America K. Schuett, Weld County Department of Planning file: SW/WLD/CENTRAL 0:x:7 r. • /o • • Arthur If. n 1.i . 1 nr..• Tv 7 May 14, 1993 Gregory J. Hobbs, Jr. Attorney at Law 1775 Sherman Street, Denver, CO 80203 01300 RE: Central Weld Landfill Dear Mr. Hobbs: r• on ,J I am in receipt of your letter of May 2, 1993. It is regrettable that we are continuing a debate by correspondence which is best left to the hearing. I would much prefer to argue within the process established by the Weld County Commissioners. Let me correct misinterpretation of my earlier correspondence and reply to your more recent comments and suggestions. I do not expect that the public will be excluded from attending or participating in the public hearing even though there may be a question with respect to standing. I continue to believe, however, and will urge that evidence, comments, and arguments must be limited by the issues framed in notice of hearing. The presentation of matters outside the notice is inappropriate and would result in the denial of fundamental due process rights relating to a vested property right. There is no provision for discovery in these matters and discovery does not appear to be either necessary or appropriate. Waste Management of Colorado, Inc., and Waste Services, Inc., have been open and candid with Weld County and the Colorado Department of Health with regard to the operation of the Central Weld Landfill. All of the information provided with regard to the past, present, and proposed future operation of the facility are public records subject to inspection in accordance with applicable law. In addition, discovery in the manner envisioned by the civil rules would be burdensome, expensive, subject to abuse without supervision which the Weld County Commissioners are not equipped to do, and would be largely duplicative with regard to the vast amount of information already in the public record. There are no present plans to close or suspend operations pending resolution of the proceedings. It is the position of Waste Management of Colorado, Inc., and Waste Services, Inc., that the facility is being, and has been, operated in compliance with the exh;6:f /3 The Law Building • 1011 11th Avenue - P.O. Box 326 - Greeley, Colorado 80832 901061 Telephone (303) 356-5400 - FAX (303) 358.1111 .7 • Arthur P. Roy Attorney at Law Gregory J. Hobbs, Jr. May 14, 1993 Page 2 Special Use Permit and the Certificate of Designation and that the proceeding to terminate have not been completed. In addition, closure or suspension of operations is not advisable from either an environmental, service, or business perspective. There will be no closure or suspension of operations unless, and until, an appropriate order has been issued and all appeals therefrom either waived or exhausted. My clients will follow the terms of their existing approval and fully cooperate with Weld County and the Colorado Department of Health in this matter. I wish to proceed with this matter in an orderly and appropriate fashion. Continued bickering, posturing, and exchange of rhetoric with copies to the public officials who will ultimately determine the -tter continues to be, in my judgment, inappropriate, ied, and unnecessarily expensive. rul APR:elh pc: Marian King Bill Jeffrey William Hedberg Lee Morrison weld County Commissioners Ex• '3 X 4nrA r,-' "._ 9:27 Maycdol-g93 Dear Connie Harbert, Recently I have learned that the Greeley -Milliken Landfill, operated by Waste Management, Inc. is an operation which might not be in the best interests of the people around it, as well as downstream water users. I world like to voice my concern that more investigating be done to discover the full extent of the damage being caused by this landfill in order to stop it and keep it from happening again in the future. It has been shown that there is lead, mercury, arsenic and several other dangerous chemicals in nearby wells, Water from holding ponds nearby the landfill is diverted into the Big Thompson river, that is, when it's not used to irrigate farmland. This landfill is in. danger of contaminating the local water supplies which could pose a problem for people living locally who use this water everyday. Reports and documents state that over the years numerous dangerous materials have been dumped in this landfill. Many companies have disposed of contaminated soil ac well as the possibility of many tons of pesticides during the seventies, The operators of the landfill fool that they should be allowed to continue tc operate without interruption and I feel that investigation should be done as to what exactly has been put Into this landfill before any expansions be allowed. A concerned citizen, cL A. -Base Derek Barvoets 2125 6th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 931061£xhi%bi f /9- • 7ai&7?out&Rg4zn. Attorneys At Law 1775 Sherman Street • Suite 1300 Denver, Colorado 80203 (303) 861-1963 • Fax: (303) 832-4465 May 2, 1993 Mr. Arthur P. Roy Attorney at Law 1011 11th Avenue P.O. Box 326 Greeley, Colorado 80632 Re: Your letter of April 22, 1993, Regarding Central Weld Landfill Dear Mr. Roy: Thank you for your letter of April 22. It was most surprising to learn that my clients, who include property owners adjacent to the Central Weld Landfill and who continue to suffer the public nuisances caused by the landfill, are being subjected to an argument that they do not have standing to be heard at the public hearing which the Weld County Commissioners scheduled for October 13, 1993. The applicable statute under which the Certificate of Designation Revocation hearing will be held, C. R.S. 30-20-112, specifically provides for a "public hearing". Your notion that the public can be excluded from participating in a public hearing is novel. I have copied you with my correspondence to the Weld County Commissioners precisely because our participation in the April 5 hearing and the granting of the October 13 hearing demonstrated the standing of our clients to raise all issues germane to the illegal operation of the Central Weld County Landfill, including those issues contained in our letters of April 8, 1993 and April 19, 1993. As to Commissioner Kirkmeyer's motion and the issues to be considered at the October 13, 1993, hearing, I am requesting by copy of this letter to the Weld County Commissioners that they examine the original of Commissioner Kirkneyer's motion and amend the ensuing resolution setting the hearing, so as to embrace all matters of non-compliance at the facility. Due process for your clients and my clients can only be served by a full and fair hearing. To that end I am suggesting that we agree to reciprocal discovery. Further, I must insist on behalf of my clients that your clients suspend immediately all operations at the Central Weld Landfill. That facility is presently operating in violation of condition no. 1 of the special use permit which required approval C -h ;t// Vic: Nh, P4, neer_ 931061 • by the Health Department, is causing trash to be blown on my client's property, constituting trespass as well as nuisance, is operating without a required pollution discharge control permit, and is leaching contaminants into groundwater. C.R.S. 30-20-112 provides that the Commissioners "shall temporarily suspend or revoke" the certificate of designation upon failure of the facility to comply with "all" laws and regulations which apply to it after "reasonable notice and public hearing". Reasonable notice and public hearing occurred on April 5, 1993, and there were admitted violations consisting of VOC groundwater contamination and the lack of a discharge permit. Evidently you and your clients do not wish to have another "public hearing". We have ordered the transcript of the April 5 hearing; it provides the immediate basis for at least temporary suspension of the certificate of Designation. upon receipt of the transcript we will be asking the Commissioners to review it and suspend the Certificate of Designation. Your attempt to have my clients and other members of the public excluded from the October 13, 1993, hearing and the fact that the facility is in non- compliance each day of its operation, demonstrates the necessity of the Commissioners protecting the public interest. Please call me at your earliest opportunity regarding a discovery schedule. c: weld County Commissioners Mr. Lee Morrison Mr. Gene Megyesy Mr. Glenn Mallory • Gregory J. Hobbs, Jr. for Hobbs, Trout & Raley, P.C. 9Z1n61 • • Artfr 11. Rug April 22, 1993 Gregory J. Hobbs, Jr. Attorney at Law 1775 Sherman Street, #1300 Denver, CO 80203 RE: Central, We1A Landfill - Waste Services, Inc. Dear Mr. Hobbs: Thank you for providing me with copies of your correspondence to Ms. Connie Harbert, Chairperson, Weld County Commissioners, dated April 8, 1993, and April 19, 1993. I appreciate you represent parties who are interested in the future operation or closure of the Central Weld Landfill but your clients are not parties to any matters pending before the Weld County Commissioners. The Weld County Commissioners are conducting a quasi-judicial proceeding to determine whether or not the Central Weld Landfill is in violation of its zoning permit. Weld County and Waste Services, Inc., are the parties to this proceeding. The decision to be reached by the Weld County Commissioners must be made on the record at the hearing. I will urge on October 13, 1993, that presentations be limited to the parties to the proceedings and that an open forum with evidence, comments, and argument from others on matters outside the notice denies fundamental due process. Unsolicited communications between counsel and the Commissioners containing factual representations and legal argument, whether related to the issues or not, are, in my opinion, inappropriate. In your letter of April 8, 1993, you essentially continue to argue facts concerning which there is a considerable dispute and you continue to argue points of law concerning which there is substantial disagreement. My client will, of necessity, have to respond to your letter of April 8, 1993, to correct the factual allegations and refute the legal argument to avoid the appearance that it concedes either. A continuing discourse in this manner is not in the interest of anyone. With respect to your letter of April 19, 1993, it appears to be your perception that Waste Services, Inc., is not entitled to notice of the issues to be heard at the hearing to be held October 13, 1993, as evidenced by your statement "that the Commissioners EX. The Law Building - 1011 11th Avenue • P.O. Box 326 - Greeley, Colorado 80632 nnCC Telephone (303) 3513-5400 - FAX (303) 356.1111 s,z1r)V s • Gregory J. Hobbs, Jr. April 22, 1993 Page 2 make it clear that the October 13 hearing will be open to presentation of whatever issues and evidence pertain to whether the Certificate of Designation should be revoked." Not only is this statement a blatant misstatement of the law it is designed to deny Waste Services, Inc., an essential element of substantive due process which is, as you well know, notice. The resolution of the Board of County Commissioners dated April 5, 1993, fairly and accurately sets forth the motion of Commissioner Kirkmeyer whose discussion was limited to whether or not the site had been approved by the State Department of Health in 1971. To the extent, if any, the motion of Commissioner Kirkmeyer requires interpretation or construction of the findings set forth in the written resolution of April 5, 1993, fully clarify the matter. It would seem appropriate to me that all counsel reserve further comment or argument until the hearing October 13, 1993, before the Weld County Commissioners or to such other hearing at which they ma .e heard either prior to or following the hearing of October 3. Arthur P. Roy Attorney at Law APR:elh pc: Marian King Bill Jeffrey William Hedberg Lee Morrison Weld County Commissioners x i/ • • SAUNDERS, SNYDER, Ross & DTCsSON, P.C. 4w Orrlccs JACK F. ROSS WAYNE J. FOWLER W.B. TOVRTILLOTT, JR. WILLIAM J. IVRVEN III JAMES W. SANDERSON EUGENE F. MEOVESY. JR. CHRISTOPHER R. PAULSON DEBORAH L. FREEMAN DAVID C. HALLFORO DAVID e. BEL-LACE PEOGY E. MONTANO HOLLY I. HOLDER CHARLES B. HECHT SPECIAL COUNSEL 707 SEVENTEENTH STREET, SU.'TE 3500 DENVER. COLORADO 90202 1303) 292.8600 FAX (303) 2923902 May 3, 1993 Ms. Connie Harbert, Chairperson Weld County Commissioners 915 Tenth Street P. O. Box 758 Greeley, CO 80632 Re: Show Cause Hearing on Central Weld Landfill Dear Ms. Harbert and Commissioners: JEFFERSON V. MOUSY ROBERT D. COMER CARMEN N. SOWER WILLARD 5, SNYDER JOHN M. OICKSON OF COUNSEL GLENN O. SAUNDERS (IDOA.IBOO) mrlumvs 'SPY IIRTYTEWSNY d RRTY2Ew.RY VOR6SMARTY TER 3. (LUXUS-RA2) 10!11 SUDAP[ST v. MUNOARY 011.36.1.266-61-22 FAX 011.16-In1631.D6 I This letter is filed on behalf of Waste Services Corporation ("Waste") in response to the April 8, 1993 letter submitted by the Ashton -Daniels Neighborhood Association ("Association") regarding the above matter. We regret that the Association has chosen to continue to submit material to the Commissioners, even though the probable cause hearing has been concluded and the Commissioners have set a future hearing which has not yet commenced. Unfortunately, the unsubstantiated conclusions and misstatements of the Association force us to submit the following clarification. We hope that future correspondence will not be necessitated and that the Association will follow the procedures of the Commissioners. We request that, since the probable cause hearing was closed on April 5 and since the show cause hearing was not begun, the Association's April 8, 1993 letter not be included in the record of either of these proceedings. In the absence of a ruling from the Commissioners on the above, we are obliged to make the following brief comments and corrections in response to the Association's April 8, 1993 letter: 1. The Association requests the Commissioners to order the removal of deposited materials from the Landfill and the immediate commencement of remedial action. These requests go beyond the Commissioners' authority in this proceeding and are not to be the subject of the show cause hearing. The Commissioners recognized this in the resolution dated April 5, 1993, wherein the subject. of the show cause hearing Ex&ari- /O cc: NA, /'/_,Ic3occ, o. aS'JFI • • Ms. Connie Harbert May 3, 1993 Page 2 is properly notified as dealing with Condition 1 of the Resolution requiring approval by the State Department of Health. The Association seeks the commencement of remedial action, but, at the same time, opposes the Application for Amendment of Special Use Permit filed by Waste Services Corp. In fact, the amendment application contains the elements for upgrading the facility and provides the vehicle for addressing environmental conditions at the facility. The Association's objection to that process is contrary to their stated desire to commence remedial. action. 2. There is no basis for the Association's assertion that Waste may not file an application to "amend" the existing approval, but can only apply for a new permit. The holder of the permit, license, or certificate of designation may always request that the terms of the approval be "amended." In addition, the site is being operated pursuant to a permit, and certainly the Association would not argue that a permittee does not have the right to voluntarily propose an amendment of that permit and subject itself to more specific and detailed permit conditions. This is precisely the nature and purpose of the pending application. 3. The letter contains numerous misrepresentations as to statements made at the 1971 hearing before the Weld County Commissioners, upon which the Association seeks to revise or revoke the approval of the Landfill. The various statements cited by the Association do not accurately reflect the transcript of the hearing and cannot serve as the basis for revising the approval. In fact, the 1971 resolution approving the Landfill cannot now be revised to reflect conditions that opponents of the Landfill desired to have included in 1971 and, failing that, are again raising. The Association cannot have the 1971 approval invalidated or altered as that would be illegal and unfair. The 1971 resolution has two conditions, and it is only those two conditions that could be subject to review at this time. We concur with the Weld County Commissioners' Resolution of April 5, 1993, wherein they determined that the show cause hearing will only pertain to Condition of Approval No. 1 in the 1971 Resolution. We strenuously object and oppose the insertion of other irrelevant issues suggested in the Association's letter. We also disagree with the assertion that the various issues raised at the hearing, but not included in the approval, were material to the issuance of the land use approval in 1971 and that they are enforceable by citizens. It is our position that certain parties EX io a Ms. Connie Harbert May 3, 1993 Page 3 attempted to include additional conditions in the 1971 approval, but they were unsuccessful. Consequently, the absence of those conditions in the 1971 approval demonstrate that they were not intended to be conditions of approval and that they cannot now be added as conditions after the fact. 4. We disagree with the Association's arguments as to compli- ance with the Department of Health approval requirement of Condition 1 of the resolution. Our position is that we are in total compliance with Condition 1. Furthermore, this particular issue will be the specific subject of the show cause hearing. 5. We object to the Association's characterization of Waste's efforts to respond to citizens' concerns as attempts to modify rules. In fact, it is the opponents of the Landfill who testified in 1971 and again in 1993 who are attempting to revisit and impose their will upon a certificate 27 years after they were unsuccessful in stopping or conditioning the Landfill's approval. 6. References were made to an opinion from an attorney in the Colorado Attorney General's office regarding interpretation of certain portions of the Colorado Department of Health's regulations as applied to the Central Weld Landfill. It was asserted that the opinion has found a violation of section 2.1.4 of the regulations. In fact, the opinion states that the Colorado Department of Health has made a claim that the Landfill "appears to violate this section." The Attorney General's office only concluded that if facts exist support- ing that claim, then a violation would lie. The determina- tion of whether or not a violation exists requires proof by the Colorado Department of Health of the facts needed to support the asserted violation, which we do not believe has yet occurred. Finally, we hope that future actions dealing with this Landfill will proceed as ordered by the Commissioners and that the show cause hearing will not be preempted by future letters, submittals, etc., to the Commissioners prior to the show cause hearing. It is inappropriate, burdensome, and prejudicial for the Association to try its case through these submittals prior to the scheduled show cause hearing. However, in order to be able to protect our rights, we request to be furnished with copies of all correspondence and submittals to and from the public and/or their counsel dealing with any matter pertaining to the Central Weld Landfill. u 2A6 ex /0 Ms. Connie Harbert May 3, 1993 Page 4 We hope and hereby offer our cooperation to address the issues of concern and to resolve these matters with the Commissioners and the citizens without undue burden upon the Commissioners, and we would like to avoid the need for further submittals, assertions, and arguments prior to the scheduled hearing and outside the normal process. Very truly yours, SAUNDERS, SNYDER, ROSS & DICKSON, P.C. } /� ne F. Me EFM:cps 20099.1.m cc: Dr. Patricia Nolan Mr. Glenn Mallory Mr. John Pickle Mr. Chuck Cunliffe Mr. Lee Morrison Gregory J. Hobbs, Esq. • r n ,• - 26 April 1993 C'',_ ' Mr. John Pickle weld County Health Department 1517 16th Ave. Ct. Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Mr. Pickle, This is to confirm my complaint in writing concerning blowing dust and debris from the landfill on April 19, 1993, in the early afternoon. Yellow plastic, plastic bags, diapers, newspapers, invoices (from as far as Riverton, wyoming), junk mail, paper cups, lids, etc. --all "sticky and dirty" --lined our fences, landed in our trees, lined our irrigation ditches, and barrow pits. Debris was flying 50 feet in the air. Undoubtedly, not very many complaints were received by your office. Bear in mind, the neighbor to the east and the one directly south have a lot of cash to lose if they make waves. Their fences, fields and ditches were likewise "trashed out." That leaves u, when the wind is from the north, and concerned citizens who notice and care but are not being trashed out directly, to file a complaint. I personally got extremely nauseated and had to leave home. With the facility taking medical waste, contaminated soil, and household hazardous wastes, how do we know what contaminates are blowing through and around our property? The facility now has a "dream" of taking "SPECIAL WAS%'ES" from all over the United States and Canada. I don't think there is a chance of our county approving this! If their absurd "dream" was approved and became an environmental nightmare, what air quality could we expect? How far does the air contamination go? This is an area of extreme winds. In the past five years, we have replaced three storm doors due to north winds, tin and shingles blow off buildings, storm windows are broken, and everything has to be tied down. Our son's 6 ft. plastic swimming pool flew 600 feet to the area of our well a few years ago! This area is not only unsuited for a landfill due to bvdroloay and aeoloav, but also due to wind patterns. 0a4 a 4 Exh'2;/ 9 pa: PL; !+L • • 2 Please take this matter seriously, and provide adequate protection for the health and safety of Weld County citizens. We need to close and clean up this facility before any more damage is done to the environment. Sincerely, Madeline Daniels 23732 WCR 271/2 Milliken, CO 80643 339-0629 cc: Governor Roy Romer Attorney General's Office Colorado Department of Health Weld County Commissioners Weld County Planning/Engineering Senator Hank Brown Senator Ben Nighthorse Campbell Representative Wayne Allard Mr. Don Bain Senator Thomas Norton Mr. Dave Owen City of Greeley City of Evans Town of Milliken CXq 22'46' 2— �.1Y�noo...n • r� _.. FG v L ex q ryq I,o 140 ft kilvize). T 7 EXPLANATION DEPTH TO WATER TABLE IN UNCONSOLIDATED ALLUVIAL DEPOSITS: IN FEET BELOW LAND SURFACE I Less than 5 15to10 10 to 20 Greater than 20 AREAS WHERE UNCONSOUDATED ALLUVIAL DEPOSITS ARE NOT PERENNIALLY SATURATED —Depth to seasonal water table generally ranges from 5 to 20 feet Where areas ate not irrigated, the deposits usually are drained by mid summer. Where areas are irrigated, seasonal water table may remain through the growing season with drainage of deposits occur- ring during the autumn AREAS WHERE LOCAL 17ED WATER -TABLE AQUIFERS OCCUR IN COLLUVIAL, LANDSLIDE, AND WIND- BLOWN DEPOSITS, AND IN CONSOLIDATED SEDIMEN- TARY ROCKS WHERE ROCKS NEAR LAND SURFACE ARE FRACTURED AND WEATHERED —Aquifer materials may not be perennially saturated; depth to water table gener- ally ranges from 5 to 20 feet; depth to seasonal water table generally less than 10 feet AREA WHERE LOCALIZED WATER -TABLE AQUIFERS OCCUR IN FRACTURED CRYSTALLINE ROCKS —Frac- tures may not be perennially saturated: depth to water table may be more than 100 feet 1 Dept to werar table generally leas than 20 fee In localized reef of unconsolidated eluvi detain (notshown on map) occurrag in stream 'Alessi wavering fractured crystalline rocks, 6142 03.6 CONTACT BETWEEN UNCONSOLIDATED ALLUVIAL DE- POSITS AND OTHER DEPOSITS AND ROCKS —Dashed where approximately located EASTERN OUTCROP LIMIT OF FRACTURED CRYSTAL- LINE ROCKS WELL WHERE DEPTH TO WATER TABLE WAS MEASURED IN 1976 OR 1977 —Number is depth to water table, in feet below land surface. CS, Weil completed in consolidated sedimentary rocks F, Well completed in fractured -crystalline rocks W. Well completed in windblown deposits AU other wells completed in unconsolidated alluvial deposits WELL COMPLETED IN UNCONSOLIDATED ALLUVIAL DEPOSITS WHERE DEPTH TO THE WATER TABLE WAS MEASURED FOR AT LEAST 4 YEARS DURING 1971 -75. —Number is average depth to the water table for the period, in feet below land surface (Data from Major. Kerbs. and Penley, 1975) 0 WELL COMPLETED IN UNCONSOLIDATED ALLUVIAL DEPOSITS WHERE DEPTH TO THE WATER TABLE WAS MEASURED BETWEEN 1955 AND 1975 s+t5I yjt6i 0 16 5 019 1980 1968 ex9 T. B N. R. 88 W., Set. 33 Terrace 1955 1970 1 of 1975 1977 INTRODUCTION The depth to the water table'' is a hydrologic factor that can be used by Sta- and local officials to assist them in making decisions regarding land-uf conversion in the rapidly urbanizing Boulder —Fort Collins —Greeley an (Index map) P __-�-- --— AREA OF YRI5 REPORT Fort Collins' 0 -� freele Boulder and Junction uehlo COLORADO MAP SHOWING AREA OF FRONT RANGE URBAN CORRIDOR This report presents the results of a 2 -year investigation to determine the dept to the water table, water -table fluctuations and trends, and to relate the resin' of the Investigation to urban planning. The report is one of a series of geolog and hydrologic reports prepared by the U.S. Geological Survey t demonstrate the usefulness of earth -science information in urban planniru In the Boulder —Fort Collins —Greeley area, the principal water -tab! aquifers consist of thick unconsolidated alluvial deposits that are perennial! saturated. These deposits occur in present and ancestral stream valleys and i terraces both along present stream valleys and on slopes of the foothills east the Front Range (diagrammatic section). DIAGRAMMATIC SECTION SHOWING OCCURRENCE OF WATER -TABLE AQUIFERS 44 RELEVANCE TO URBAN PLANN The depth Jo the water table le a relevant factor I nmrq for urban development as indicated by the following examples; A. Depth to tha+yater table ekes than 5 feet either seasonally or annually. I. TO:effectiveness of Individual domestic waste -disposal systems could be reduced and untreated wastes could enter the ground -water system. Some of the biochemical reactions associated with Individual waste -disposal systems occur In the unsaturated zone below or adjacent to the system. Because the reactions do not occur In water, the gaiter the depth to the water table, the greater the possibility that than reecterr will complete the conversion of waste to an effluent that is not a health hamrd. 2. Road and highway stability could be affected. Public access to lands might be limited where marshy ground col to 3. Soil -salinity problems could exist The types of vegetation that could be grown In these areas would be dependent on the degree of the salinity, but even without any salinity problems, many types of vegetation could not grow In these areas, 4, Unstable soli structure, which often limits the use of land, could exist 5. Construction of structural or building foundations could be hampered the flow of ground water Into the construction excavations. 6. Basements could be subject to collapse from water pressure and flooding. The situations described In hems 4, 5, and 6 also could occur In areas where the depth to the water table Is rat more than 10 feet either seasonally or annually. B, Depth to the water table related to depth of Installation: 1. Liquid wastes or leachates from solid waste could be Introd__.. 'kltrectly into the ground -water system by water moving through landfills an related types of facilities, resulting In degradation or pollution of the ground water. The possibility of degradation or pollution would be dependent on the type and amount of waste, the depth of burial of the waste, and the seasonal or annual depth of the water table in the area of the landfill or related type of facility, 2. Ground water could enter' l &y smeary sewers, ?toteng'In' a significant increase In the volume of waste to be processed by waste -treatment facilities. The volume of water entering a leaky sanitary sewer would be dependent on the depth of burial of wwerand theseasonal or annual depth to the water table, 3. The placement of electric and telephone utility lines below ground and the type of insulation and conduits required for below -ground installation would be, In Part, dependent on the depth to the water table. DEPTH TO THE WATER TABLE Measured depths to the water table ducting 1976-77 in the unconsolidated alluvial deposits ranged from 0 to 45.6 feet, Generally the depth to the water table In the Rood plains of present streams was less than 10 feet and, In many localities, it was less than 5 feet The depth to the water table In ancestral stream valleys, such as Beebe Draw, and In the terraces ranged from 0.S to 45,6 feet. Water levels In wells completed in windblown deposits, consolidated sedimentary rocks, and fractured crystalline rocks were measured only in Boulder County. In the county, the depth to the water table in the windblown deposits ranged from 3 to 12 feet In the consolidated sedimentary rocks, It ranged from 1 to 29 feet and in the fractured crystalline rocks, it ranged from 9 to 193 feet. SELECTED REFERENCES Colton. R. B., 1978, Geologic map of the Boulder —Fort Collins —Greeley area, Colorado U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Investigations Map I-855 C. Jenkins, E, D., 1461, Records and logs of selected wells and test holes, and chemical and radiometric analyses of ground water in the Boulder area, Colorado: Colorado Water Conservation Board Basic -Data Report 5, 30P Major, T J., Herbs, Lynda. and Penley, ft D., 1975, Selected water -level records for Colorado, 1971-75- Colorado Water Conservation Board Basic -Data Release I57. ,3(dj p Schneider, P. A„ Jr., 1962. Records and logs of selected wells and test holes and chemical analyses of ground water n the South Platte River basin in western Adams and southwestern Weld Counties, Colorado, Colorado Water Conservation Board Basic -Data Report 9, 84 p Schneider, P A., Jr., and Hershey, L A., 1961, Records and logs grated web and test holes, and chemical analyses of ground water in the lower Cache la Padre River basin, Colorado Colorado Water Conservation _ Board Basic -Data Report H, 60 p, Schneider, P. A., Jr. and Hillier, D. IL, 1978, Hydrologic data for water -table aquifers in the Boulder—Fon Collins --Greeley area, Front Range Urban Corridor, Colorado: U.S. Geological Survey Open-Fle Report 78-567, 55 p. MULTIPLY Font Mile Acre METRIC CONVERSIONS Iiv O.R4a 1.609 09047 TO OBTAIN Mater Kilometer tier tern In, UN, NI 9,amn M Omrtwron, US Latvia Awry. IIn. 151W,, tyuM Gma, nay,, CO awh x9 LP s'2.�6! a 102 10 L I Clean gravel 1 I. 1 T I Permeability, cm,/sec. I0"1 1042 10"' 10"' 10-5 io-6 10"' 10"6 10'' � t Clean sands mixtures of clean sands and gravels 1 ) I Very fine sands; silts Mixtures of sand, silt and clay; glacial fill; stratified clays; etc. Unweathered clays 106 los 10' to' 102 10 I 1 Permeability, gal,/day/ft? 1 I r 1 10"1 1o"2 1o"' 10'4 FIGURE 4. Permeability ranges of different soil classes (Hughes and others, 197.1; modified from :odd, :959, S rh6 GrtGioy- M)lLKen Land Pill Low bu�l1' OuCr Under5rGrncl SQrrr1nl5/'tr 1.1 the m deft. pr ci. drat not, elra-.✓ ..l is V M 'It �r6 .n 1k FIGURE 5. Generalized movement of leachate through the land phase of the hydrologic cycle (from Schneider. 1970,. p. PC), Arrows show flow of ground -water) dots show dispersion of leachate. Ex 5 - u 0 48 01.()s" MANSEN DISPOSAL METHODS Most solid waste is disposed of in one of five general ways: in open dumps, by incineration, by on -site methods, by recycling, and in sanitary landfills. The open dump is a problem because it is an attraction for vermin, insects, and other disease - carrying organisms. It causes visual blight and is a source of pollution, off -site, to the environment. Many cities, large and small, now have regulations that prohibit open dumps, but compliance is difficult to enforce. Incineration is coming into the fore, partly be- cause sites for sanitary landfills are becoming harder to find. Methods of incineration vary greatly, and nowadays power is even being generated as a by- product. Depending on the efficiency of the inciner- Of the ground -water gradient with virtually no ois- persion upstream. Figure 6 depicts the very simple but very common condition in which solid waste is dumped into an . exhausted gravel pit; the leachates go directly into the ground -water and disperse downstream. Even if the fill is normally above the water table, a seasonal rise of the water table would induce a reaction between the ground -water and the waste material, and even a qualified organic chemist could not predict all the possible chemical combinations that would result. Microbial and chemical decomposi- tions of the waste material generate various gases. One of the more common reactions in an aerobic en- vironment is the production of carbon dioxide fryn the breakdown of the cellulose. The CO. in the presence of water, produces carbonic acid which reacts with many components of the dump, which in ator system, the waste can be reduced by as much as turn tends to raise the hardness of the water and 90 percent by volume or as little as 40 percent. In increase the biochemical oxygen demand (Schneider, either event, the residue still has to be rehandled 1970, p.' F4). Anaerobic decomposition leads to the (Office of Science and Technology, 1969, p. 50). production of methane, ammonia, and hydrogen sulfide.. On -site disposal is largely limited to industry, All these reaction products make their way into the but much garbage and some combustible waste are now handled in the home. But in -home disposal only passes the problem on to somebody else, because the residue is just flushed down the drain and sent elsewhere for further processing. Recycling is still somewhat utopian, but in a modest way it has been going on for a long time. A great deal of garbage, for example, has been fed to hogs in the past and is being fed to them today. Feeding garbage to hogs, however, carries a real danger Of spreading disease, and legislation in the past few years has tended to require that edible refuse be boiled or cooked before being fed to the animals. Composting is another useful but statis- tically insignificant form of recycling. The sanitary landfill, at the present time, is the most satfsfa tor- y widespread method of disposal, but it presents many problems. PROBLEMS OF LANDFILLS Geology plays a key role in the proper location and design of sanitary landfills, especially with re- spect to ground -water movement, and therefore, to off -site pollution. Figure 4 is a logarithmic state showing permeability of tight, unweathered clay on the one hand, and clean gravel on the other, with gradations between. Permeability rates, of course, are much higher for clean gravel than for clay, and it is ironic that most of our landfills are located in areas near the lefthand side of the Figure --in sands and gravels. These are the areas where cyclic land use has resulted in the removal of gravel and sand for other purposes and has left convenient holes in the ground where we tend to dump our waste and where we have the greatest problems with ground- water contamination. In the simplest case, Figure 5. the water table follows the slope of the land; ground -water moves down a gradient which, in general, is parallel to the slope. The landfill in the upper lefthand corner is releasing leachates that travel vertically downward through the soil until they reach the water table; they then move in the direction 45 hydrologic regimen or escape to the atmosphere. Figure 7 illustrates another fairly simple example that is very prevalent in the mountain com- munities of Colorado. the case in which leachate J ,. cs travels down directly to the water table. Shortly below. a zone of fractured bedrock provides ideal channelways for the long-distance migration of >" leachates. In the rare but more nearly ideal case. . p�• the solid waste is deposited in an environment of `'• ' very low permeability and porosity and essentially is contained within the waste disposal site iteself. r' Prior geologic studies can help find such settings. THE SANITARY LANDFILL V Just what is meant by a sanitary landfill? The study by the Office of Science and Technology (1969. p. 59)reviewvedmore than 6,000 landfills throughout the United States and found that only about 6 percent of them were, indeed, sanitary. The intent of the sanitary landfill procedure is to confine the leach- ates--the waste byproducts --essentially to the land- fill site; to cover the site daily so as to dis- courage the proliferation of vermin and minimize Offensive odors and visual blight; and, finally, to restore a ground surface that Can be used for other purposes after the landfill is completed. In Pits Oftentimes the fill is emplaced in three separ- ate lifts for better control (Figure 8). Common practice is to emplace about four feet, or four units, of compacted fill to one unit of cover material per day. finally, a minimum soil cover about two feet thick is used to top the completed landfill. In an actual example in the Denver area, a gravel pit was worked right down to a claystone bottom. The same claystone was used to provide an impervious membrane on the walls of the pit, to cover each individual lift, and finally, to restore the surface with a final cover. A "plumbing system" was devised tO carry away seepage and rainwater. Demolition waste, which usually lacks many of the undesirable characteristics of ordinary landfill refuse, was not .EX 7 HANSEN FIGURE 6. Effect On ground -water resource of solid waste disposal An a permeable environment (from Schneider, 1970; p. F8). d :WATER -TA8 —r_z_ — =� FIGURE 7. Effect on ground -water resource of solid - waste disposal at a site underlain by fractured bed- rock (from Schneider, 1970, p. F9). FIGURE 8, Diagrammatic cross section of a three -lift sanitary landfill (from McCullough and Pacey, 1971, p. 54). 49 Lx 2.d ft y 3,,Q, PURPOSE Waste Services Corporation (WSC) recognizes that Federal, State, and local regulations need to be supplemented by an internal control program which ensures that all waste streams from industry and commerce receive attention commensurate with the risk associated with managing the waste. This access control plan as required by Special Review Permit Condition 3 (d) for waste identification and screening program has been developed to identify commercial and industrial wastes that require special handling from a regulatory or employee -safety perspective, and serves as a hazardous waste and PCB screening mechanism that prevents these waste streams from entering the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Compiiance with the Waste Screening Program will also ensure compliance with the waste screening feoyirements of the Federal Subtitle D regulations (40 CFR Part 258.20(a)(1)-(3)). ZS_ DEFINITIONS Director of an Aooroved State - In accordance with 40 CFR 258.2, "the chief administrative officer of a State agency responsible for implementing the State municipal solid wane permit program or other system of prior approval that is deemed to be adequate by EPA under regulations published pursuant to sections 2002 and 4005 of RCRA.• Empty Container - A container that meets the following description: All wastes have been removed that can be removed using the practices commonly employed to remove materials from the type of container (e.g., pouring, pumping, or aspirating), ,end An end has been removed (for containers larger than 25 gallons), and No more than 1 inch of residue remains on the bottom of the container or inner liner, or No more than 3 percent by weight of the total capacity of the container remains in the Container or inner liner (for 110 -gallon containers or smaller), or No more than 0.3 percent by weight of the total capacity of the container remains in the container or inner liner (for containers larger than 110 gallons). Containers which once held acutely hazardous wastes (as defined by Federal, or State regulations) must be triple rinsed with an appropriate solvent or cleaned by an equivalent method to be considered empty. Alternatively, the container's liner may be removed and managed as a hazardous waste by, while the outer shell is managed as a special waste. Containers which once held pesticides regulated under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act must be emptied according to label instructions. Cylinders of compressed gas are empty when the pressure in the container is substantially equivalent to atmospheric pressure. friable Asbestos - In accordance with 40 CFR 61.141, "friable asbestos material means any material containing more than 1 percent asbestos as determined using the method specified in appendix A, subpart F, 40 CFR 763 section 1, Polarized Light Microscopy, that, when dry, can be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure. If the asbestos content is less than 10 percent as determined by a method other than point counting by polarized light microscopy (PLM), verify asbestos content by point counting using PLM.- , PM! 3/02 Page 1 of 6 Hazardous Waste - A waste determined to be a 'hazardous waste' by Federal. State (including the State of waste origin or the State in which the proposed management facility is located). This definition also includes any waste whose management requires approval or a license from an agency of the federal government (e.g., PCB waste, radioactive waste). Hazardous Waste Facility - A facility which has received all required Federal, or State approvals, licenses, or permits necessary to receive and manage hazardous waste. Industrial Process Waste - Special waste generated by manufacturing or industrial processes (e.g., waste from the production of paper, glass, electricity, etc.). This definition does not include wastes such as empty boxes from a shoe store, food scraps from a restaurant, etc. Incidental to the Load • Quantities of special waste (excluding friable asbestos) which may be managed without special handling because the quantity does not materially change the physical chemical characteristics of the load and the material is not regulated as a hazardous waste, radioactive waste or regulated PCB waste. L)auid Waste - Any waste that is determined to contain 'free liquids' as determined by Method 9095 (Paint Filter Liquids Test), described in 'Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods" USEPA Publication SW -846. According to 40 CFR 258.28, this definition does not include waste in containers similar in size to that normally found in household waste, or waste in containers designed to hold liquids for use other than storage. Management • Transportation, transfer, storage, treatment, reclamation, incineration or disposal of waste. Special Waste - Any waste which may require special handling or management due to regulatory requirements and/or employee safety. These may include any discarded material from a non-residential source, which is non -hazardous and meeting any of the following descriptions. a. Waste from an industrial process (including process sludges). b. Waste from a pollution control process (e.g., baghouse dust, treatment plant sludge, filter cake, sedimentation pond cleanout, etc.). c. Waste containing free liquids (see definition of liquid waste') d. Residue and debris from the cleanup of a spill of a chemical substance or commercial product or a waste listed in (a) through (c), or (e) through (g). This definition applies to spills of any size. e. Contaminated residuals from the cleanup of a facility generating, storing, treating, recycling, or disposing chemical substances, commercial products, or wastes listed in (a) through (d), (f), or (g). f. Any waste which is non -hazardous as a result of treatment pursuant to RCRA Subtitle C. 0. Chemical -containing equipment removed from service, in which the chemical composition and concentration are unknown. MMR 3M2 Page 2 of 6 tx �r . h. Friable asbestos from building demolition or cleaning;; wall board, wall or ceiling spray coverings, pipe insulation, etc. Non -friable asbestos (e.g., asbestos -containing floor tiles, brake pads, roofing products, etc.) is not a special waste unless it has been processed, handled, or used in such a way that when dry, it becomes crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder. Commercial products or chemicals which are off -specification, outdated, unused, or banned. This category includes containers which once held commercial products or chemicals unless the container is "empty" as defined in this section. Outdated or off -specification uncontaminated food or beverage products in original consumer containers are not special waste unless management of such products is restricted by applicable regulations. j, Untreated medical waste - Any waste capable of inducing infection due to contamination with infectious agents from a bio-medical source including but not limited to a hospital, medical clinic, nursing home, medical practitioner, mortuary, taxidermist, veterinarian, veterinary hospital, animal testing laboratory, or medical testing laboratory. Any sharps from these sources must be rendered harmless or placed in needle puncture proof containers. k. Treated medical wastes - Any wastes from a bio-medical source including but not limited to a hospital, medical clinic, nursing home, medical practitioner, mortuary, taxidermist, veterinarian, veterinary hospital, animal testing laboratory, or medical testing laboratory which has been autoclaved or otherwise heat treated or sterilized so that it is no longer capable of inducing infection. Any sharps from these sources must be rendered harmless or placed in needle puncture -proof containers. Residue/sludges from septic tanks, food service grease traps, or washwaters and wastewaters from commercial laundries, laundromats, and car washes. m. Chemical -containing equipment removed from service, in which the chemical composition and concentration are known (e.g., oil filters, cathode ray tubes, lab equipment, acetylene tanks, fluorescent light tubes, etc.). n. Waste produced from the demolition or dismantling of industrial process equipment or facilities contaminated with chemicals from the industrial process. o. Incinerator ash generated at a Resource Recovery Facility that burned only non -hazardous household, commercial, or industrial waste and qualifies for the hazardous waste exclusion in 40 CFR 261.4lb). SW -846 Methods - The third edition of "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods' USEPA Publication SW -846. Ultimate Management Feclll& - A facility at which a waste is either disposed or managed in another manner such that additional management of the original waste is not required. WSC - Waste Services Corporation, an affiliate of Waste Management of Colorado, Inc. WMNA: Waste Management of North America, Inc. or any division or subsidiary thereof. AMR 3/92 Page 3 of 6 Ex� ;3:.06 // It SPECIAL WASTE IDENTIFICATION 3.1.a Special Waste Identification Program WSC will implement and document the results of a special waste identification program that identifies special waste produced by Central Weld Sanitary Landfill and its commercial and industrial customers. Identification may be made by physically reviewing commercial and industrial processes, written survey, phone questionnaires or other methods which will accurately identify regulated wastes, such as hazardous waste, PCB wastes, radioactive wastes or special wastes. Hazardous wastes that are identified during the special waste identification program will be referred to a permitted hazardous waste transfer, storage, disposal (TSDF), 3.1.b Prohibited Wastes Hazardous waste, radioactive wastes, or Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) wastes, which are subject to U.S. or State regulations are prohibited at the Central Weid Sanitary Landfill. These wastes will be managed by a permitted TSDr. 3.2 SPECIAL WASTE MANAGEMENT DECISION PROCESS An acceptance decision to approve or disapprove special waste management will be clearly documented for each special waste stream WSC is requested to manage. At a minimum, the following requirements must be met prior to WSC facilities managing special waste: • The customer must provide information about the waste and sign the 'Generator's Waste Profile Sheet'. (Attachment A) • • • WSC will review the GWPS and associated information, ensuring the generator that information adequately characterizes the waste not to be a regulated hazardous waste, contain regulated quantities of PCBs or is a radioactive waste. The information must be adequate to assign conditions/limitations on managing the waste, ensuring that the facility is permitted to accept the waste. An expiration date for the Special Waste Management Decision will be assigned and will not exceed three years from the date that the waste stream was approved for management and must be renewed if the process generating the waste changes. WSC will notify the customer in writing of all conditions/'imitations that apply to managing the waste, and the customer will be required to comply with all conditions/limitations. 3.3 Special Waste Decision Renewal Process Prior to the expiration date of a Special Waste Management Decision, the underlying facts concerning the waste stream will be re-examined and a decision rendered in accordance with section 3.2 whether to continue managing the wastes and whether expanded service is required. •M111/1z Page 4 of 6 f.An6' iz • • 3.4 SPECIAL WASTE DOCUMENTATION The "Generator's Waste Profile Sheet"(GWPS) must be completed and signed by the customer special waste streams managed by WSC. The generator must complete the form to the best of his/her knowledge but may leave certain portions incomplete if other generator supplied information adequately characterizes the waste. 3.4.a Changes or Additions to Paperwork Any changes made to the written information provided by the customer will be initialed and dated by the WSC personnel making the changes, and the reason for the changes will be noted. When practical, the customer should acknowledge these changes by initialling and dating in proximity to the changes. If these changes affect the precautions, conditions, or limitations of the Special Waste Management Decision, the customer will be informed in writing of the changes. jQ LABORATORY USAGE 4.1.a Acceptable Laboratories The following laboratories, listed in order of preference, will be used for conducting analyses of special waste: • A WSC affiliated laboratory. • A commercial or private laboratory, using SW -846 or equivalent approved test methods acceptable to WSC. 4.1.b Analytical Requirements As part of the Special Waste Management Decision process, WSC personnel will evaluate as applicable, corrosivity, ignitability, reactivity, toxicity (TCLP), to determine if a special waste is a hazardous waste. Although generators may not be obligated by law to provide these analytical results, WSC personnel will obtain proper, analytical results or equivalent information (i.e., 40 CFR 262.11 allows generator's knowledge of the waste and process generating the waste) to ensure that WSC is not managing hazardous waste or other prohibited wastes. Analyses must have been conducted within 12 months prior to the date on the "Generator's Waste Profile Sheet" and within the SW -846 holding times for the parameters to be analyzed, but not to exceed 90 days from the sampling date. Q TRAINING WSC employees will be trained in the identification of special waste. Spotters and equipment operators will be present at the active face at all times that waste is unloaded, to check for peculiarities (e.g., hot loath, sludges with high liquid content, etc.) in the waste stream. Waste shipment records, manifests or other recognized mechanisms will be implemented to ensure that incoming special waste has been properly identified, that hazardous wastes are not accepted at the facility, and that other unacceptable wastes are managed properly. All associated documentation will be maintained at the facility. , M4! Via Page 5 of 6 * 2Z1.n6-t- Ex 13 • • All employees responsible for waste acceptance or inspection Hill be trained, at a minimum, to recognize and properly respond to hazardous waste, PCB waste, and other unacceptable wastes. L.Q OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENT,$ If unacceptable wastes are identified, the material will be segregatttd until adequate documentation is obtained to determine the appropriate management method. Appropriate agencies will be notified as required. Additionally all efforts will be taken to identify the general or of the material. If the quantities of unacceptable wastes are incidental to the load and are non -hazardous, non -radioactive and non -PCB contaminated waste may be accepted without completion of a GWPS. iS SPECIAL WASTE PROGRAM RECQRDS_ Records will be maintained in accordance with applicable regulations. All documents will be maintained at the facility and will not be destroyed without concurrence of the WSC legal counsel. M/R 3/92 Page 6 of 6 c."1 06# tx AitTh- IP GENERATOR'S WASTE PROFILE SHEET • INSTRUCTIONS Information on this form, is used to determine it the waste may be transported. treated. stored or disposed in a legal. safe. and environmentally sound manner. This information will be maintained in strict confidence. Answers must be provided for all sections of this form, and must be printed in ink or typed. A response of "NONE; or "NA" (not applicable) can be made, if appropriate. If additional space is needed, indicate on the form that additional information is attached, and attach the information to the Generator's Waste Profile Sheet. Shaded areas of the attached form are for Contractor's use only, If you have questions concerning this form, please contact Contractor's sales representative. PART A. WASTE GENERATOR INFORMATION 1. GENERATOR NAME — Enter the name of the facility where the waste is generated. 2, SIC CODE - Enter the 4 -digit Standard Industrial Classification Code for the facility where the waste is generated. 3. FACILITY ADDRESS — Enter the street address (not P.O. Box) of the facility where the waste is generated. 4. GENERATOR CITY, STATE/PROVINCE - Enter the c':ty and state or province where the waste is generated. 5. ZIP/POSTAL CODE — Enter the generating facility's zip or postal code. 6. GENERATOR USEPA/CANADIAN FEDERAL ID — Enter the identification number issued by the USEPA or CANADIAN FEDERAL AGENCY to the facility generating the waste (if applicable). 7. GENERATOR STATE/PROVINCE ID - Enter the identification number issued by the state or province to the facility generating the waste (if applicable). 8. TECHNICAL CONTACT - Enter the name of the person who can answer technical questions about the waste. 9. PHONE - Enter technical contact's telephone number. PART 8. WASTE STREAM INFORMATION 1. NAME OF WASTE - Enter a name generally descriptive of this waste (e.g., paint sludge, contaminated soil, incinerator ash, untreated medical waste, friable asbestos, fluorescent bulbs). 2. PROCESS GENERATING WASTE — List the specific process/operation or source that generates the waste (e.g., paint spray booth, spill clean up, incineration of municipal refuse, asbestos removal, building maintenance). 3. ANNUAL AMOUNT/UNITS - Enter the amount of waste that will be generated and transported annually. Use appropriate units to describe this volume (e.g., cubic yards, gallons, kilograms, pounds). 4, WASTE TYPE - Based upon reading the Contractor's Definition of Special Waste that is included in section 3,5 of these instructions, determine whether your waste is a "Type A Special Waste' or a "Type B Special Waste". Indicate the proper response in the space provided. 5. SPECIAL HANDLING INSTRUCTIONS/SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION - For all wastes, describe any special handling requirements and any additional information that you feel would assist in determining the proper rn thod(s) for transportation, treatment, storage, and disposal of the waste, For Type B Special Waste, provide the 'supplemental information" requested after each applicable definition, CONTRACTOR'S DEFINITION OF SPECIAL WASTE a. "Special Waste' means Type A or Type B Special Wastes as defined below. b. "Type A Special Waste" means any waste from a commercial or industrial activity meeting any of the following descriptions: i. A waste from an industrial process. ii. A waste from a pollution control process. A waste containing free liquids. iv. Residue and debris from the cleanup of a spill of a chemical substance or commercial product or a waste listed in i.-iii., or v. -vii. of this definition. v. Contaminated residuals, or articles from the cleanup of a facility generating, storing, treating, recyc;ing, or disposing chemical substances, commercial products, or wastes listed in i.-iv., vi., or vii. of this definition. vi. Any waste which is non -hazardous as a result of treatment pursuant to Subtitle C of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). vii. Chemical -containing equipment removed from service, in which the chemical composition and concentration are unknown. Side t of 4 E WMNA-4151 (02/92) c. "Type B Special Waste mi any waste from a commercial or�ustriaf activity meeting any of ,the i following descriptions: i. Friable asbestos waste from building demolition or cleaning; wall board, wall or ceiling spray coverings, pipe insulation, etc. This does not include nonfriable asbestos unless it has been processed, handled or used in such a way that asbestos fibers may be freely released. Asbestos -bearing industrial process waste is a "Type A Special Waste". Supplemental Information - List the source (e.g.. building demolition, pipe insulation removal) of the asbestos or asbestos containing material(s) and the type of asbestos containing material (e.g., pipe insulation). List the ■ agent(s) used to wet proper USEPA or Federal (and/or state or provincial) waste identification code (if applicable). List the wetting • a current Material Safety Data he asbestos Sheet. Material andinclude its chemical Sheet. List hes a and type of container(s) that will be used to onttain� hen rasbestos. Indicate whether the asbestos has been contaminated with any other wastes, and if so, list them. ii. Commercial products or chemicals which are off -specification, outdated, unused, or banned. Outdated or off -specification uncontaminated food or beverage products in original consumer containers are not included in this category, unless management of such containers is restricted by applicable regulations.. Containers which once held commercial products or chemicals are included in this category unless an end has been removed (for containers larger than 25 gallons). and the container is empty as defined by RCRA, the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), or other applicable regulations. ACRA considers a container to be empty when: all wastes have been removed that can be removed using the practices commonly employed to remove materials from the type of container (e.g., pouring, pumping or M aspirating), and no more than 1 inch (2.S4 centimeters) of residue remains on the bottom of the container or inner liner (for containers c 1 10 gallons), or no more than 0.3% by weight of the total capacity of the inner liner, or no more than 3% by weight of the total capacity of the container remains in the container or container remains in the the container or inner liner (for containers > 110 gallons). Containers which once held ACUTELY HAZARDOUS WASTES must be triple rinsed with an appropriate solvent or cleaned by an equivalent to atmospheric pressure. equivalent method. The pressure in cylinders of compressed gas and aerosol cans must be substantially • Containers which once neld pesticides regulated under FIFRA must be emptied according to label instructions. Supplemental Information - List the commercial product or chemical and include the proper waste identification code (if applicabit) for that material. List whether the commerical product or chemical has been banned, if so, - M why and by what agency, List whether the commercial product or chemical is off -specification and why. Attach copies of the most current Material Safety Data Sheets, if they exist. Indicate the current state of the waste (e.g. sludge, liquid, solid). iii. Untreated medical waste - Any waste capable of inducing infection due to contamination with infectious agents from bio-medical sources including but not limited to a hospital, medical clinic, nursing home, medical practitioner, mortuary, taxidermist, veterinarian, veterinary hospital, animal testing laboratory, or medical testing laboratory. Sharps from these sources must be rendered harmless or placed in needle puncture -proof containers. Supplemental Information - List the source from the list above. List the specific waste type(s) and include appropriate warnings for the handling of these wastes. lncicate any special requirements for the labeling. packaging and storage of these waste types. iv. Treated medical waste - Any wastes from a bio-medical source including but not limited to a hospital, medical clinic, nursing home, medical practitioner, mortuary, taxidermist, , animal which n has beenerinary autoclaved porlotherwise heat ntreated laboratory sterilized so testingthatal it no laboratory capable of inducing Infection. Any sharps from these sources must be rendered harmless or placed in needle puncture -proof containers. Residue from incineration of medical waste is a "Type A Special Waste'. Supplemental information - List the source from the list above. Specify how the waste was treated. WMNA-4151 (02/92) L106Side 2 of a I • • v. Residue/sludges from septic tanks, food service grease traps, washes, or wthese washwaters and d wastewaters from commercial laundries. laundromats, and car wastes are managed at commercial or public treatment works. Supplemental Information - Indicate the physical state of the waste (e.g., liquid, sludge. solid). List the specific sources) (e.g.. septic tank pumoings from hotel) of the waste and indicate whether there are any industrial discharges incorporated into the waste. Indicate whether or not a commercial laundry cieans clothing that may be Contaminated with chemicals from an industrial facility. List the types of vehicles cleaned at car washes. Include a statement that indicates whether the interiors of any truck, or the exteriors of bulk chemical or waste tank trucks are washed, vi. Chemical -containing equipment removed from service, in which the chemical composition and concentration are known (e.g., acetylene tanks, cathode ray tubes, lab equipment, fluorescent light tubes, etc.). Supplemental Information - List the specific equipment removed from service and any additional information pertaining to the chemical contained in that equipment. including type, concentration and volume. vii, Waste produced from the demolition or dismantling of .industrial process equipment or facilities contaminated with chemicals from the industrial process. Chemicals or residues removed or drained from such equipment or facilities are "Type A Specia, Wastes'. Supplemental Information - List the waste type(s) (e.g., piping, pumps, tanks) and the process type(s) from which they came. Indicate whether there are residuals contained in the process equipment. Describe the process used to decontaminate the equipment and list any chemicals or mixtures of chemicals that were used in the cleaning process. Attach a copy of the most current Material Safety Data Sheets for each of the chemicals used in the original process, the end product of the process, and the chemicals or mixtures of chemicals used in the cleaning process. Indicate whether this waste is contaminated with asbestos or asbestos insulation. viii. Incinerator ash generated at a Resource Recovery Facility that burned only non -hazardous household, commercial, or Industrial waste and qualifies for the hazardous waste exclusion In 40 CFR 261.4(b). If tie regulatory authority does not recognize the household hazardous waste exclusion, then the ash is a "Type A Special Waste. Supplemental Information - If the ash is wetted during 'storage or transportation, list the wetting agent(s) used and include its chemical composition or provide a current Material Safety Data Sheet. 6. INCIDENTAL AMOUNTS OF SPECIAL WASTE - The Contractor recognizes that many customers will pr Qduce some "Special Waste," as defined above. Incidental quantities of special waste (i.e., quantities that do not materially change the physical or chemical identity of the load or make it hazardous waste). do not require the customer to sign a Generator's Waste Profile Sheet. However, the customer must identify the type and amount of special wastes which will be provided to the Contractor in incidental amounts. PART C. TRANSPORTATION INFORMATION ....METHOD OF SHIPMENT — Indicate the anticipated method of shipment by checking the appropriate box. 2. SUPPLEMENTAL SHIPPING INFORMATION - Enter any additional shipping information, 3. INDICATE IF THIS WASTE IS A USDOT (see 49 CFR 171) OR CANADIAN FEDERAL HAZARDOUS MATERIAL. If so, answer Questions 4, 5, and 6 below, 4. HAZARD CLASS/ID - Enter the proper USDOT or Canadian Federal hazard class/enter the proper USDOT (see 49 CFR 172) or Canadian Federal Identification Number. 5. REPORTABLE QUANTITY (RQ)/Units (lb/kg) - Enter the RO established by 40 CFR 302,4 or equivalent Canadian regulation for this waste. Indicate the appropriate units of the RO. 6. SHIPPING NAME — Enter the proper USDOT or Canadian Federal shipping name for this waste. PART D. TECHINCAL MANAGER DECISION — To be completed by Contractor's representative only. PART E. MANAGEMENT FACILITY INFORMATION/DECISION - To be completed by Contractor's representative only. PART F. PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF WASTE - If Part 6.4 was checked "Type B". co directly to Par. J. 1, COLOR - Describe the color of the waste (e.g., blue, transparent, varies). 2. ODOR - DO NOT SMELL THE WASTE! If the waste has a known incidental odor, then describe it (e.g., acrid, pungent, solvent, sweet). WMNA-4151 (02/92) t Side 3 of 4 E_x9 3. PHYSICAL STATE - If the fo oxes provided do not apply, a descriptiOhrase may be entered after "Other' e. gas). 4. LAYERS - Check all applicable boxes, Multi -layered means more than two is ers (e.g.,( g layered means the waste is comprised of two layers which may or may not be of the same phase.g., solvent/sludge). Single phased means the waste is homogeneous, Bi_ 5. SPECIFIC GRAVITY - indicate9�• oil/water, the range. The specific gravity of water is 1.0, Most organics are less than 1.0. Most inorganics and paint sludge are greater than 1.0. 6. FREE LIQUIDS — Check "YES' if liquid is usually present when packaging for shipment and estimate the percent of 846) or direct observation. liquid volume. CHECK "NO" if there are no free liquids as determined by the Paint Filter Test (Method 9095 of SW - 7. pH - Indicate for liquid portions of the waste. Check the appropriate boxes which cover the pH of the waste. Use the "Range' space if appropriate. For solid or organic liquid wastes, indicate the pH of a 10% aqueous solution of the waste if applicable. Check "NA" for non —water soluble materials (e.g., foundry sands), 8. FLASH POINT — Indicate the flash point obtained using the appropriate testing method. PART G. CHEMICAL COMPOSITION 1. List all organic and/or inorganic components of the waste using special chemical names. If trade names are used, attach Material Safety Data Sheets or other documents which adequately describe the composition of the waste. For each component, estimate the range (in percents) in which the component is present. In addition, indicate whether any of the TCLP constituents are present in the waste. The total of the maximum values of the components must be greater than or equal to 100% including water, earth, etc. 2. If this waste contains PCBs, cyanides, or sulfides, indicate the cencentration(s). If this waste does not contain these constituents, indicate by checking the "NO" box(es) which applies. If the concentration of these constituents is unknown, please indicate 'UNK' under 'ACTUAL." her the method used tO ermine the chemical 3. IndicaCharacteristic t Leaching Procedure) method, an analysis to determine the total concentrations. onsition in G.1. s, toreaTCLP nother method. Specify the other method.(Toxicity PART H. SAMPLING SOURCE — Describe exactly where the sample was taken (i.e., drum, lagoon, pond, tank, etc.). PART I. REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLE CERTIFICATION — This section only needs to be completed when orovidino a waste sample to Contractor for testin .' Some Special Wastes require analytical data to determine their chemical composition, regulatory status, and if they are acceptable for transportation, treatment or disposal. The sample should be collected in accordance with 'Test Methods for the Evaluation of Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods,' SW -845, USEPA, and/or 40 CFR 261.20(c), or equivalent rules. A suitable sample container for most wastes is a wide mouth glass bottle with a plastic cap having a non —reactive liner. Plastic containers are recommended for strong caustics or fluorides. Fill to approximately 90% of capacity to allow for expansion during transportation. The sample must be packed and shipped in accordance with U.S. DOT or Canadian equivalent regulations and any specific requirements imposed by the carder. Improperly packaged samples may be disposed upon receipt. 1. PRINT SAMPLER'S NAME - Enter the sampler's name. 2. SAMPLE DATE - Enter the date that the sample was collected. 3. SAMPLER'S TITLE — Enter the sampler's title. 4. SAMPLER'S EMPLOYER - Enter the name of the sampler's employer. S. SAMPLER'S SIGNATURE — The sampler must sign in the space provided. PART J. GENERATOR CERTIFICATION — By signing this Generator's Waste Profile Sheet, the Generator certifies that the statements in Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 are true and accurate with respect to the waste streams listed. 7. SIGNATURE — An authorized employee of the Generator must sign this Generator's Waste Profile Sheet. 8. TITLE - Enter employee's title, 9, NAME - Enter employee's name. 10. DATE - Enter the date signed. KEEP A COPY OF THIS GENERATOR'S WASTE PROFILE SHEET FOR YOUR RECORDS, SENO THE ORIGINAL AND ALL ATTACHMENTS TO THE CONTRACTOR'S SALES REPR ESENTATIVE. WMNA-4151 (02/92) f I I I 1 I I I I I Z - x9 r2Sided of 4 ig • ArtlOur j. Eng I rris April 22, 1993 Gregory J. Hobbs, Jr. Attorney at Law 1775 Sherman Street, #1300 Denver, CO 80203 Tv 1;5 RE: Central Weld Landfill - Waste Services, Inc. Dear Mr. Hobbs: Thank you for providing me with copies of your correspondence to Ms. Connie Harbert, Chairperson, Weld County Commissioners, dated April 8, 1993, and April 19, 1993. I appreciate you represent parties who are interested in the future operation or closure of the Central Weld Landfill but your clients are not parties to any matters pending before the Weld County Commissioners. The Weld County Commissioners are conducting a quasi-judicial proceeding to determine whether or not the Central Weld Landfill is in violation of its zoning permit. Weld County and Waste Services, Inc., are the parties to this proceeding. The decision to be reached by the Weld County Commissioners must be made on the record at the hearing. I will urge on October 13, 1993, that presentations be limited to the parties to the proceedings and that an open forum with evidence, comments, and argument from others on matters outside the notice denies fundamental due process. Unsolicited communications between counsel and the Commissioners containing factual representations and legal argument, whether related to the issues or not, are, in my opinion, inappropriate. In your letter of April 8, 1993, you essentially continue to argue facts concerning which there is a considerable dispute and you continue to argue points of law concerning which there is substantial disagreement. My client will, of necessity, have to respond to your letter of April 8, 1993, to correct the factual allegations and refute the legal argument to avoid the appearance that it concedes either. A continuing discourse in this manner is not in the interest of anyone. With respect to your letter of April 19, 1993, it appears to be your perception that Waste Services, Inc., is not entitled to notice of the issues to be heard at the hearing to be held October 13, 1993, as evidenced by your statement "that the Commissioners Ex.A;h;f- $7 The Law Building - 1011 11th Avenue - P,G, Box 326 • Greeley, Colorado 80632 Telephone (303) 356-5400 - FAX (303) 356.1111 CC.: PG, NG, becc. 9Za_A6' • • Gregory J. Hobbs, Jr. April 22, 1993 Page 2 make it clear that the October 13 hearing will be open to presentation of whatever issues and evidence pertain to whether the Certificate of Designation should be revoked." Not only is this statement a blatant misstatement of the law it is designed to deny Waste Services, Inc., an essential element of substantive due process which is, as you well know, notice. The resolution of the Board of County Commissioners dated April 5, 1993, fairly and accurately sets forth the motion of Commissioner Kirkmeyer whose discussion was limited to whether or not the site had been approved by the State Department of Health in 1971. To the extent, if any, the motion of Commissioner Kirkmeyer requires interpretation or construction of the findings set forth in the written resolution of April 5, 1993, fully clarify the matter. It would seem appropriate to me that all counsel reserve further comment or argument until the hearing October 13, 1993, before the Weld County Commissioners or to such other hearing at which they max he heard either prior to or following the hearing of October LT, 19, 3. Yours truly,^ 1 ' Arthur P. Roy Attorney at Law APR:elh pc: Marian King Bill Jeffrey William Hedberg Lee Morrison Weld County Commissioners 9;146_'._ 2 April 19, 1993' ^: 25 Governor Roy Romer 136 State Capital Bld. Denver, Co 80203 Dear Governor Romer: We wish to adamantly object to Mr. Glenn Mallory's proposed changes to the Solid Waste. Regulation Draft Amendments, specifically section 3.1.10 as written December 30, 1992. They state, "Continued operation of sites and facilities that have placed waste into groundwater is prohibited." Subtitle D has been highlighted for a long time as the screening process for eliminating problem landfills. On February 4, 1993, comes Leonard J. Butler, Waste Management Inc., in a letter to Glenn Mallory complaining that the rules should be changed so waste Management Inc.'s landfills could be allowed to continue to operate despite the obvious intent of Subtitle D. We quote Mr. Butler, "We recommend . . 3.1.10 be reworded to state the operation of sites and facilities that place waste into groundwater ;after the effective date of these regulations is prohibited." Further comments of Mr. Butler are attached. Mr. Glenn Mallory, Colorado Department of Health, complied with Mr. Butler's wishes. Mr. Butler sounds like a sibling telling his parents, "It's not fair." This is ludicrous. We're not dealing with a child's sense of "fair." We are dealing with a lethal matter. How many Globevilles, Lowry landfills, or Summitville mines do we need before Colorado tries the "ounce of prevention"? Let's live up to the letterhead of Colorado Department of Health: "Dedicated to protecting and improving the hgelth and environment of the people of Colorado." Thus, we will ensure that our beautiful state with its land and water can remain so for our children and grandchildren. (continued) Exh;64 7 04-1()61 • • 2 NO MORE GLOBEVILLES, ROCKY FLATS, ARSENALS, LOWRY LANDFILLS, OR SUMMITVILLE MINES!!! WE MUST SAVE THE BIG THOMPSON AND SOUTH PLATTE, mIII Sincerely, The Daniq .s (Madelilie, Harold & row) 23732 WCR 27 1/2 Milliken, CO 80543 339-0629 CC: Senator Hank Brown Senator Ben Nighthorse Campbell Representative Wayne Allard Senator Thomas Norton Attorney General's Office Mr. Dave Owen, State Representative Mr. William Jerke, State Representative Mr. Patrick Sullivan, State Representative Weld County Commissioners Environmental Prctection Agency Colorado Department of Health Weld County Health Department City of Greeley Town of Milliken Town of Evans ,EX. ex.7- 0 Inc 3 dp- WE�Dc. COLORADO April 2, 1993 Mr. Glenn Mallory Hazardous Materials and Waste Management Division Colorado Department of Health 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South Denver, Colorado 80222-1530 Dear Glenn: C WSL. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH'. 1517.1e AVENUE COURT GAEEr, COLORADO 80531 ADMINISTRATION (303) 353.0586 HEALTH PROThVTTON (303) 1*vm37 COMMUNITY HEALTH (303) 3334639 This letter is in regard to the Draft Solid Waste Regulations, specifically section 3.1.10 as written in the December 30. 1992 Draft. Please be advised that I total support this sectgn aswritten, and as placed in the Draft. I base this support on the practical experience of dealing with this problem at the Central Weld facility over the past year. Further, I speculate that you will encounter this same problem in several of the older landfills all over the State. It is my understanding that the pu ose of Subtitle D was to upgrade and/or weed out those facilities that are t ya problem sites. Certainly one of the areas of greatest concern in these older sites is poor site selection. based on the standards of site selection in use at present. This is further complicated when these poor sites, by operation, create even less adequate sites. Lets look at the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill specifically, as an example. Given the history of aroundwatgr problems at this site, (much less the proof of these problems we see at present)', one can hardly argue that this site would not be approved lender today's site selection criteria. Furthermore. operations, (operations which were violations of the standards even of that day), have created even a less desirable site. As you are aware, it is hardly economically feasible to excavate previously filled areas. This would be especially true in those areas where solid waste have been placed into the groundwater. Since this condition cannot be remedied, it would seem logical that it be considered a site consideration. 24Whether or not a current operator created this sort of problem seems to me to be 7 of no concern. The site is either suitable, or it is not. If it 'Is not."-- illitiltaiT7—rtr should not be allowed to continue to operate under Subtitle D. Consequently, I feel very strongly that section 3.1.10 of the December 1992 Draft of the revised Solid Waste Regulation is very applicable, and should be left as written. Ex:7 '20146' 5L ..t I feel that I am commenting from experience on this matter. and I hope you consider that fact in your deliberations. I also appreciate the opportunity to present my views to you. Very Truly Yours. ha S. Pickle, M.S.E.E. Director Envirommeatai Protection Services Division I 'a Waste Management of Sit America, Inc. Western Region "� '��/ Rocky Mountain Satellite Office Y 5660 Greenwood Pm Blvd. • Suite 400 Englewood. Colorado 00111 •• 303/770-3324 • February 4, 1993 Mr. Glenn F. Mallory :. Solid Waste and Incident Management Section Hazardous Materials and Waste Management Division Colorado Department of Health 4300 Cherry Creek Drive, South • Denver, CO 80222-153O • RE: Draft Solid Waste Regulations !'je'P1,ill! Dear Mr. Mallory: In response to your memorandum of December 30, 1992, I have prepared the following questions and comments for your consideration regarding the draft Solid Waste Regulations dated December 24, 1992: , • Section 1.2.., ,.... •::.,....... RecaMmend that It would be dearer to delete 'for solid wastes disposer since the following fist of items include transfer stations, and sludge sites, which are clearly not 'facilities for solid waste disposal." Section 1.2.6 • Recommend placing a comma after 'Transfer following clause refers to all transfer stations not Just For claritiicaliGr., this s^ctIon should specifically as the operations standards discussed in Section 7. Section 1.5.3.3 Under Type E Processing/Storage Sites and Facilities, Category 3 includes special waste and non-exempt transferf the fee stations. ince pursuant to Section 7.1(B). its dear that anition for these terms are necessary ll determine the applicability transfer stations are exempt from permit requirements. Stations' to make it dear that the to some. reference the applicable standards Section 2.1.3 The operating standard cited in Section 7.2.3(O) states: Cx.7 C106:" 3- Mr. Glenn F. Mallory February 4, 1993 Page 2 "Nuisance Conditions. All reasonable measure shall be employed to collect, properly contain, and dispose of scattered litter including frequent policing of the area, and the use of wind screens where necessary. The facility shall be managed in such a manner that noise, dust and odors do not constitute a hazard to human health. The facility shall be managed in such a manner that the attraction, breeding and emergence of birds, insects, rodents and other vectors do not constitute a health hazard.' This standard should be cited in the Minimum Standard Sections 2.1.3 and 2.5.6. The use of this standard brings consistency to the intent of ensuring nuisance conditions are abated. Section 3.0 This section requires a compliance schedule between the Department, Await fa Owners/Operator and the Local 1996. It isrecognized thag Authority to t Section 3.1 1tain lull state-wide though Section 3.1.5 1 all tes by October 9, 1996• restate the location restrictions Identified.ay not D. However, the slte by this standards a at described in Sections 3.1.6 through many Colorado sites because of their ambiguity. Section 3.1.6 The Section 3.1.6 requirement that the topography of the landfill maximize protection against prevailing winds is very subjective. Further, this section requires minimizing the amount of precipitation catchment area fpg adl nnt of interpretation site.Due at subjective nature of these requirements which may ultin in Section between regulators, this standard should be deleted. Operating criteria :Actrecited the Section and the Minimum Standards existing in Section 2 e. Section 3.1.7 The flood plain location restriction should repeat the standard required in 40 CFR 258.11. As proposed, this section is notimisplem ins deflned�c n CFRno ,26on has been provided for the size of the base flood. (Section 3.1.8 This section Is unenforceable ion 3.2.5 arbecause andards wh ch are designed to pro e t aq� s requirements cited in SectSince there is no quantitative standard for regardless of the on cob, your o rconsideration of deleting this section is requested. groundwater flow in section 3.1.8, Y • Mr. Glenn F. Mallory February 4, 1993 Page 3 Section 3.1.9 This standard of 'emphasizing favorable geologic conditions over engineered improvements of marginal geologic conditions' is subjective in content and has been difficult to define for many years in public hearings and in litigation. No definition exists for the regulators or the regulated community. It Is recommended that given Incorporation of the more restrictive Subtitle D standards into Colorado's regulations, this subjective requirement be deleted. .. I'.r • ....,-. . Section 3.1.10 l .'•i. Since this is an operational, rather than a Rotational, standard, we recommend that it be moved to Section 3.3. This standard requires clarification to indicate that placement of waste into groundwater is prohibited. We recommend that the second sentence of Section 3.1.10 be reworded to state that 'The operation of sites and facilities that place waste into groundwater after the effective date of these regulations Is prohibited.' As currently drafted, this regulation would penalize owners/operators that Identify surface water or groundwater in contact with waste. Only about one-third of the solid waste disposal facilities in Colorado currently monitor grcundwater. Facility data may not be available for the remaining sites to ascertain site conditions. Further, historic practices or artificial influences in the surrounding groundwater table may have caused groundwater to Infiltrate waste regardless of past or present waste placement activities. The remainder of the existing unit or lateral expansion of the site may be lined or planned for construction of liner material. • Section 7 A definition striation regaidhngterms arch as mater'.' recovery facility, intermediate processing center and active operating area should be developed for clarification of terms. The following definitions are offered: ateriaRe 'very Facility 1MRF1: A facility designed to receive -and process! m• ;.,. materials. ,}• , ._._._iediate prgrec. i Facility: A facility designed fo r I1011t104 -- ..... t; ./ unprocessed municipal solid waste. p•>1.� Active Area: An area that includes all areas of unloading storing and out loading. • Mr. Glenn F. Mallory February 4, 1993 Page 4 Section 7.2.2(A)(6) 1• f This section requires truck wheel curbs. Our experience has shown that curbs may be unnecessary if trucks are not permitted to back dose to unloading areas. Therefore, this requirement should be more performance related to state "measures shall be provided to prevent backing into Os while unloading`. ' D ; ,^,arip!:nu Pequiremarts (238.52) We recommend that the requirement "... ground water samples shall not be field - filtered prior to laboratory analysis" be deleted in Section B since the previous sentence indicates: (1) that analytical methods shall be according to Colorado Department of Health guidelines or an EPA approved method; and (2) a proposed rule lifting the ban on field filtering is being considered by EPA. ' Thank you for the opportunity to submit these comments and participate in the development of the draft Solid Waste Regulations to incorporate Subtitle D requirements. We would appreciate the opportunity to discuss these comments and questions with you further if any clarifications are required prior to the Mardi, 1993 hearing date. Sincerely, Leonard J. Butter, P.E., DEE Vice President - Environmental Management • y �Y�a �_.,. , Sri: cc: Yom Schweitzer, WMC.:•r t f�� l�Jlifi • ` Bruce Clabaugri, 1NMli i CtiTi?' •, rat,• 14 r .:01 �l:r 4^4 Charles Bayley, WMC .. ,,1.,•., fr Subtitle D/Colo- 2.3 it ; • I.t;�f �r•v •••znrF} ./alai n • . yet. �f• 4;rnf''1 I I7 -Sts: rat& ASP C Attorneys At Law 1775 Sherman Street • Suite 1300 Denver, Colorado 80203 303) 861-1963 • Fax: (303) 832-1465 Ext. 123 April 19, 1993 Ms. Connie Harbert, Chairperson Weld County Commissioners 915 -10th Street, P.O. Box 758 Greeley, Colorado 80632 Re: Order to Show Cause Hearing, Central weld Landfill -- Request for Clarification and, in the alternative, Motion to Amend Resolution Setting Hearing Dear Chairperson Harbert and Commissioners: On behalf of the Ashton -Daniels Neighborhood Association, we seek clarification of the issues that will be considered at the October 13, 1993, certificate of designation revocation hearing which the Commissioners ordered regarding the Central Weld County Landfill. Clarification is required because the action of the Board at the conclusion of the hearing, according to the minutes of April 5, 1993, and our handwritten notes of the motion made by Commissioner Kirkmeyer, demonstrate that the hearing was set for October 13, 1993, to consider the broad range of issues regarding compliance all applicable laws, resolutions, and regulations which apply to the landfill. The April 5, 1993, minutes at page 5 state as follows: After further questions of the Board were answered by Mr. Morrison, Commissioner Kirkmeyer moved to find there is probable cause to set a Show Cause Hearing. After discussion, she included the date of October 13, 1993 at 10:00 a.m. in her motion. Commissioner Webster seconded the motion. On roll call vote, the motion carried four to one... Our notes of Commissioner Kirkmeyer's motion state that she moved for a determination that there is probable cause consisting of reasonable grounds to believe that facts exist that the Central Weld Landfill is not in compliance with Special Use Permit 116. ,±Xh,b, b `', CA, PA) hie Lovin\74-i 93106 Ms. Connie Harbert April 19, 1993 Page 2 The discussion, led by Commissioner Kirkmeyer, was that violations existed based on citations by the Weld County Health Department (at least 4 violations) and that the Colorado Attorney General's Office had concurred that there is a violation of 2.1.4 of the minimum sanitary standards of the State of Colorado. The motion was concurred in by four Commissioners after the date was chosen. However, the ensuing resolution setting the hearing appears to say that there is only one issue to be determined at the October 13 hearing, whether the permit holder is in compliance with Condition of Approval #1 of Special Use Permit #116. This appears in the "Further Resolved Clause" of the Resolution following the primary resolved clause (which determined that a revocation hearing should proceed): NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that a Show Cause Hearing be scheduled to determine whether or not the Special Review Permit issued to Waste Services Corporation should be revoked. The further resolved clause would correctly reflect the evidence and information presented at the April 5 probable cause hearing if it said that "among the issues to be considered" is whether condition # 1 of the Special Use Permit, had been violated. However, the use of the words "the issue to be considered" appears to be such that the State of Colorado, the Weld County Planning and Health Departments, and the citizens of Weld County would be precluded from presenting whatever evidence and issues of violation were pertinent in connection with the certificate of revocation proceedings. Certainly, the Commissioners did not intend such a result. The applicable statute of the State provides that the Commissioners are to hear and consider all alleged violations of law, resolution, or regulation when such a hearing is convened pursuant to public notice: REVOCATION OF CERTIFICATE. The board of county commissioners, after reasonable notice of public hearing, shall temporarily suspend or revoke a certificate of designation that has been granted by it for failure of a site and facility to comply with all applicable laws, resolutions, and ordinances or to comply with the provisions EX•(o Ms. Connie Harbert April 19, 1993 Page 3 of this part 1 or any rule or regulation adopted pursuant thereto. C.R.S. 30-20-112. Ashton -Daniels Exhibit A.D.-35 is a March 30, 1993, memorandum of the Weld County Health Department setting forth four violations (see attached). These are the violations which Commissioner Kirkmeyer referred to in making her motion for determination that a Show Cause Hearing on revocation of the Certificate of Designation should be set. The Ashton -Daniels Neighborhood Association requests that the Commissioners make it clear that the October 13 hearing will be open to presentation of whatever issues and evidence pertain to whether the certificate of designation should be revoked. The purpose of the April 5 probable cause hearing was to determine that the hearing should be held and not to determine the issues and facts in absence of a full public hearing on the merits. To restrict the Show Cause Hearing to only the issue of compliance with special condition # 1 would constitute a determination that the environmental contamination issues cannot be heard or determined at the hearing. Such a determination would be contrary to C.R.S. 30-20-112 and would deprive the citizens of Weld County of the scrutiny which thee landfill operation facility and operation should undergo at the October 13, 1993 public hearing. On page 15 of the summary of its presentation the Ashton -Daniels Neighborhood Association set forth its delineation of the issues to be considered at the Show Cause hearing on permit revocation. At the Probable Cause Hearing there was information and evidence presented on each of these issues. Accordingly, by appropriate further resolution the Board should clarify that the subject of the October 13, 1993, is intended to include whatever issues and evidence are within the scope of C.R.S. 30-20-112 and should set forth, by way of example but not by way of preclusion, those issues contained in Mr. Pickle's memorandum of March 30 (attached) (which was an exhibit in the hearing), the two special conditions of Special Use Permit 116, and those issues set forth on page 15 of the Ashton -Daniels summary. Condition # 2 of the Special Use Permit is at issue because it requires compliance with Weld County's land use regulations and procedures, and the evidence shows that this use has been conducted in violation of such requirements, which specify that special review conditions, such as condition # 1, must be adhered to in order to have a valid land use on the subject property. Ex. t, Ms. Connie Harbert April 19, 1993 Page 4 Please serve us with all notices and information which the County issues on the subject of the Central Weld County Landfill. The Ashton -Daniels Neighborhood Association, having appeared at the April 5 hearing, and representing neighboring landowners surrounding the landfill, and representing a public and citizen perspective on the enforcement of all applicable laws, resolutions, and regulations, is entitled to receive notice and be heard in all matters related to these proceedings. Gregory J. Hobbs, Jr. for Hobbs, Trout & Raley, P.C. Attorneys for Ashton -Daniels Neighborhood Association /GJH c: Mr. Arthur Roy Mr. Gene Megyesy 201_n6" y ex. 423 Public Improvements 30-20-113 reset, if necessary, the fee limitation established in subsection (1) of this section. (3) All fees collected pursuant to subsection. (1) of this section shall be transmitted to the state treasurer, who shall credit the same to the sludge management program fund, which fund is hereby created. The moneys in such fund shall be subject to annual appropriation to the department by the general assembly, which shall review expenditures of such moneys to assure that they are used to accomplish the purposes of this section. Any interest earned on moneys in the fund shall remain in the fund to be used for purposes of this section. Source: L. 86, p. 1042, § 1. 30-20-111. Departments to render assistance. The department and local health departments shall render technical advice and services to owners and operators of solid wastes disposal sites and facilities and to municipalities. and counties in order to assure that appropriate measures arc being taken to protect the public health, safety, and welfare. In addition, the department has the duty to coordinate the solid wastes program under this part 1 with all other programs within the department and with the other agencies of state and local government which are concerned with solid wastes disposal. Source: L. 67 L. 71, p. 344. § 12. 30-20.112. Revocation of certificate. The board of county commissioners, after reasonable notice and public hearing, shall temporarily suspend or revoke a certificate of designation that has been granted by it for failure of a site and facility to comply with all applicable laws. resolutions, and ordi- nances or to comply with the provisions of this part 1 or any rule or regulation adopted pursuant thereto. Sour .7, •. 761, § 13; C.R.S. 1963, § 36-23-13; L. 71. p. Quasi-judicial action must be preceded by reasonable notice. Under the solid wastes act (4 4 30.20.101 through 30-20-116), quasi-judi- cial action by county commissioner must be preceded by reasonable notice. City & County of Denver v. Eggert, 647 P.2d 216 (Colo. 1982). Proper notice of quasi-judicial agency action must reasonably describe the subject matter of the hearing, any charges to be considered, and the action contemplated. City & County of Denver v. Eggert. 647 P.24 216 (Colo. 1982). 30-20-113. Enforcement - civil penalty. (1) Any solid wastes disposal site and facility found to be abandoned or that is operated. maintained, inactive, or closed in a manner so as to violate any of the provisions of this part 1 or any rule or regulation adopted pursuant thereto shall be deemed a public nuisance, and such violation may be enjoined by a district court of competent jurisdiction in any action brought by the department, the board of county commissioners of the county wherein the violation occurred, or the governing body of the municipality wherein the violation occurred. (2) Disposal of solid waste at a location other than a site designated for such use by a county or municipality is a violation of this part 1, unless other- wise exempted by this part 1 or unless the person is disposing of his own max. 6 3.7 nt4 *FP 'n _a FPCM _-. u . • Att. Vine mEmoRAnDUm To Prom autepret Chuck Cunliffe. Planning John Pickle. Hes Central Weld Sanitary Landfill March 30. 1993 On March 2. 1993, Trevor Jiricek of our staff inspected thw cenrrai Weld Sanitary Landfill. The purpose of the inspection was to asawat the facility's compliance sposal Site's Ons with the "Regugated ay the Solid ns Pertaining tw Dicpnsal Sitesolid Wouvraw and Facilities Att, Title e30. as pramulaated by Article 20. Part 1. C.R.C. The facility matinees in mwmn rn yrs. of 2-21-02! 1. Tha operators have not submitted a complete Design and Operations Plan. 2. tie Central Weld Sanitary Landfill continues to upelaW without required Di3charge.rermits. 3. to Central Weld Sanitary Lwrdlill continues to COhtamihate the groundwater. i. The Central Wtt%1 Sanitary Lant".1I1 tact allowed solid waste to come into cuul.acL with groundwater OA this site. I met wlii 1111 1Sedberg, Site Manager on march 23, 1993. Although we primarily discussed water matters. no tsatiCA was made of any change is these areas of non- o:rauplianee. In addition. 1 have received nothing to date with regard to same. If you have further questions, please contact Trevor Jiricek or ma. a state of nom -compliance at previoasiy cited in My EXHIBIT .a TOTAL. PAGE.Oi? ** En. /o DATE: April 5, 1993 CASE NUMBER: ZCH-96 NAME: Waste Services Corporation, c/o Waste Management 40000 Weld County Road 25 Ault, CO 80610 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the W2 SW4 and the SE4 SW4 of Section 32, T5N, R66W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: Approximately 1-1/2 miles northeast of the Town of Milliken. It is the opinion of the Department of Planning Services' staff that Condition of Approval #1, as approved for Special Use Permit #116, is not in compliance. Condition of Approval #1 states: That any sanitary landfill facility to be installed shall be approved by the State Health Department. Mr. John Pickle, in his memoranda dated February 22, 1993 and March 30, 1993, to Chuck Cunliffe and his memorandum dated April 1, 1993, to the Board of County Commissioners, has identified the items of noncompliance with Condition of Approval #1 for Special Use Permit #116. On April 1, 1993, Waste Services Corporation submitted applications for amended Special Use permit #116 and amended Certification of Designation #26. Bill Hedberg's letter of March 31, 1993, is attached. The Department of Planning Services is proceeding with the processing of the applications. Based upon the above information, the Department of Planning Services and Weld County Hc'alth Department recommends that the probable cause hearing be continued to December 1, 1993, to allow sufficient time for the amended Special Use permit and amended Certificate of Designation applications to be reviewed and considered by Weld County during the standard land -use application review procedures. Ex. 4 8C1.06' / • • Now is the time to enforce this express representation by remediation and closure orders pursuant to a noticed public hearing on revocation of the certificate of designation. CONCLUSION_ A show cause order should be issued to Waste Services, Inc. to show why the certificate of designation should not be revoked for 1) failure to submit an engineering report and design and operations plan and receive the approval of the State Department of Health prior to land fill installation, 2) creation of a public nuisance, 3) violation of the minimum sanitary, engineering, and operational standards of the Colorado Department of Health, and 4) non-compliance with Weld County land use, zoning, and special use resolutions and approvals. Dated this 5th day of April, 1993. Respectfully submitted, Gregory J. Hobbs, Jr., #0009' - Jennifer Russell, /22047 Hobbs, Trout & Raley, P.C. 1775 Sherman St., Suite 1300 Denver, Colorado 80203 Tele: (303) 861-1963 Fax: (303) 832-4465 ATTORNEYS FOR ASHTON-DANIELS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION 15 112.1.06.k. --✓--Ltd-a.ce�cG�-�� 0.��t�-�O_r��'�1'y-�"`--- 04+4427 Exl,ib;?-5 exh;0-5 hit (i cam-- ---6-x--3 I Q;zO6 7-zblk raft& �� P C. :!3 Attorneys At Law 1775 Sherman Street • Suite 1300 Denver, Colorado 80203 (303) 861-1963 • Fax: (303) 832-4465 April 8, 1993 Ms. Connie Harbert, Chairperson Weld County Commissioners 915 -10th St., P.O. Box 758 Greeley, Colorado 80632 Re: Show Cause Hearing, Central Weld Landfill r Dear Chairperson Harbert and Members of the Commission: On behalf of the Ashton -Daniels Neighborhood Association, we thank you for ordering a show cause hearing on the revocation of the land use approval and certificate of designation for the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill as a result of the Probable Cause Hearing held on April 5, 1993. As stated in our presentation we believe that waste materials have been and continue to be deposited in the landfill in violation of the County's resolution of October 6, 1971. and that illegally deposited materials should be ordered to be removed. We asked for an early hearing so that Waste Services, Waste Management and the citizens would have a full hearing, an early revocation of the permit, and the commencement of remedial action as soon as. - possible. The fact that the hearing has been scheduled for October 13, 1993, in no way alters our view that Waste Services and Waste Management act at their peril in further depositing materials at the landfill while the hearing is pending. Our position is that the pending application by Waste Services and Waste Management for an "Amendment" is not an amendment at all but a new application which must be judged as though a new facility were being proposed. An "amendment" can only amend an exising engineering and operations plan and, since none exists, a new application for such a plan must be reviewed and processed, including full siting consideration as to suitability of the site for a landfill. ,&n,br7 ' y. -J_'6 I • • The information received by you at the April 5 hearing clearly shows that the siting of the landfill was posited on preparation of an engineering report and review and approval of a design and operations plan by the State Health Department prior to deposit of waste in the landfill and that the owners and operators, to this day, have never complied with this conition no. 1 of Weld County's land use resolution. The current land use approval must and should be revoked and consideration of any further use of the site by the Weld County Commissioners and the State Health Department can and should occur only as a separate process which is subject to full land use and special use permit review at the Weld. County level and design and operations review and approval at the State level. Representations were made at the September 22, 1971. hearing that the landfill's life would not extend beyond 15-20 years, that waste materials would not contact groundwater and that if groundwater contamination occurred landfilling would cease, that the countour of the site would blend into surrounding farmland, and that the land would be £armable upon closure. These representations were material to the issuance of the land use approval by Weld County, are enforceable by the County, and in the absence of thereof can be enforced by the citizens of Weld County. In particular, it appears that Waste Services and Waste Management, with or without the County's approval, intend to operate the site another 12 years and will proceed vertically. If material representations such as those made at the September 22, 1971 hearing are not enforced the entire process of public hearing and regularity in governmental decisionmaking is thwarted and made the subject of misrepresentation and fraud. As a result of the April 5 hearing, Waste Services and Waste Management are clearly on notice that its further landfilling, activities are or may be in violation of the County's October 6, 1971 resolution which remains in effect and is the subject of the October 13, 1993 hearing. We ask that we be included on the mailing list for receipt of all notices, hearings, meetings, information and submittals made in connection with Weld County's and the -ate of Colorado's review and consideration of the "Amendment" being proposed by Waste Services and Waste Management. On behalf of Weld County citizens we hereby oppose the issuance of any authorization or approval by Weld County or the State of Colorado for further use of this site as a landfill, and we request that remedial action orders issue requiring prevention of ground and surface water contamination and removal of all waste material deposited at the site in contravention of the October 6, 1971 resolution. 2. At the April 5, 1993, hearing Waste Services and Waste Management placed great reliance on a September 18, 1992, letter from Austin N. Buckingham to Kent Hanson stating that landfills with a certificate of designation granted prior to the February 22, 1972, State regulations were grandfathered from the design and operations plan requirement. Of course, Ms. Buckingham wasreferring to the general principle and was unaware, apparently, that the certificate of designation for this site contained, by reason of the October 6, 1971, county resolution the following condition: 1. That any sanitary landfill facility to be installed shall be approved the the State Department of Health (Exhibit A.D.-8). Exhibit A.D.-3 in the record as part of the land use approval process leading to the October 6, 19771 County Resolution shows that the purpose of this requirement was to invoke section 4 of the then proposed State regulations pertaining to design and operation. As Ms. Buckingham's letter of September 18, 1992, says, certificates of designations, i.e. those issued prior to February 1992,,were grandfathered according to their terms and the underlaying land use resolutions of the counties issuing such certificates. Ms. Buckingham's September 18, 1992, letter specifically notes that "To the Division's knowledge, no design or operations plan has ever been developed for the landfill. nor are any plans of this nature contained in the Division files. Again, it is our position that Waste Services and Waste Management's application to amend the existing Special Use Permit NO. 116 and the related Certificate of Designation No. 26 has no basis in State statutory law or in the zoning regulations and land use procedures and resolutions of Weld County. We ask that you treat the application as for a new use and that you proceed according to County and State law to revoke the existing land use authorization and certificate of designation. Please send to us as soon as possible County and State regulations, respolutions, requirements and policies which address new and amended applications for design and operations plans, Special Use Permits, and Certificates of Designation for our review. In the meantime we ask your staffs and attorneys to meet with us, to examine the applicable laws and procedures, and to postpone any processing or decision on Waste Services application for Amendment pending such review and analysis. The brief summary we submitted at the April 5 hearing is attached and we are proceeding to prepare further factual and legal analysis for your examination. We ask that you be vigilant to protect against any changes to County or State regulations which would allow Waste Services or Waste Management to make further' "grandfathering" assertions. It appears that their approach is to claim exemption from regulations or to fashion 3. • • which act in their favor and against the public interest. In particular, we ask that you carefully scrutinize the pedning revisions to the State's solid waste management regulations and we ask that we be put on the mailing list of the Solid Waste Advisory Committe, the State Board of Health, and any other office or agency wherein the subject of landfill requirements, particularly grandfather proposals may be at issue. We object to Waste Services and Waste Management's attempts to change the rules and representations under which this landfill was originally certificated and we strenuously object to any further rise in vertical height. We are now in preparation for the revocation of hearing of October 13, 1993, and in reliance thereon object to any surrogate or collateral implied or express authorization of furhter landfilling at this site. Best regards. Sincerely Gregory J. Hobbs, Jr. for Hobbs, Trout b Raley, P.C. Attorneys for Ashton -Daniels Neighborhood Association CC: Dr. Patricia Nolan Mr. Glenn Mallory Mr. John Pickle Mr. Chuck Cunliffe Mr. Lee Morrison Mr. Art Roy Mr. Gene Megysey Mr. Bill Hedberg 44 on W�GOc. COLORADO • • mEMORAMU To From Subject: Board of County Commissioners April 1, 1993 te John Pickle, Healt' Hearing - Central Weld Sanitary Landfill The Central Weld Sanitary Landfill has been in operation at least since 1971. Waste Services Corporation took over the operation in 1989 and merged with Waste Management of Colorado, Inc., in 1991. The site has been monitored over the years by the Colorado Department of Health, as well as Weld County Health Department. Our Department has tried to maintain an inspection frequency of at least four visits per year. In addition, our laboratory sampled Central Weld's monitoring wells until the discovery of Volatile Organics indicated a more sophisticated monitoring program was necessary. In July of 1992, I met with Bill Hedberg of Waste Services at this facility. At that meeting we discussed the history of groundwater problems at this site and Waste Management's efforts to control them to date. Mr. Hedberg also informed me at that meeting that Waste Management's Laboratory had discovered low levels of contaminants in several downgradient monitoring wells and that a full written report would be forthcoming. He asked that in light of these findings Central Weld be allowed to discontinue its agreement with Weld County for monitoring, and contract with a more sophisticated laboratory. I readily agreed with this proposal since our lab could not test for Volatile Organic Compounds. As clarification for the Board, Volatile Organic Compounds are contaminants commonly from landfill leachate, as well as underground storage tanks. agricultural runoff, and other sources. VOCs are common constituents in industrial and household solvents pesticides, and other chemical products. Toxicological studies have shown that some of these organics have the potential for carcinogenesis in human beings. Consequently, their presence in the groundwater is of public health concern. In August, 1992, we received the Hydrogeologic and Geotechnical Characterization for the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, Weld County Colorado. After review and discussion with Colorado Department of Health personnel, we cited the Central Weld facility in October, 1992. (See attached Report and letters of August 17, and October 5, 1992.) Waste Management performed confirmation sampling at the Central Weld facility in September, 1992. The results confirmed previous findings submitted in the Hydrogeological Characterization of July. (See attached Central Weld Sanitary Landfill Confirmation Groundwater Sampling, October, 1992.) Golder Associates Inc. performed an Expanded Hydrogeological Investigation at the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, Colorado in October, 1992. The purpose of this S investigation was to determine the extent of migration of the VOCs offsite. (See attached Expanded Hydrogeological Investigation.) Since October, subsequent inspections, discussions with Colorado Department of Health personnel, and meetings with Waste Management have culminated in Weld County Health Department citing the Central Weld facility for four (4) violations, and requesting this Hearing. The Department contends that Central Weld Sanitary Landfill is in non-compliance with existing rules in the following areas: 1. The operators of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill have not submitted a complete Design and Operations Plan. There is some question as to whether or not this was a requirement at the time this facility was permitted. Such a report was required in the 1971 Amendments to the Solid Waste Act prior to the hearing by the Board of County Commissioners, but the Act requires such a report only "as may be required by the [State Health] Department by regulation." The State appears to have decided that no report was necessary as they treated the landfill as a grand£athered site. Regardless of the State's position, it appears that the Board of County Commissioners expected such a review and that one never occurred. A review of the files does not show that there ever has been an "approval" by the State Health Department. The Board of County Commissioners requested a Design and Operations Plan for this facility by November 12, 1992. A partial submission was made by Waste Management. After review, this submission was considered incomplete. (See attached letter of February 22, 1993.) To date, the additional documentation has not been submitted. This is a violation of 30-20-103, Colorado Revised Statutes. (Copy attached) 2. The Central Weld Sanitary Landfill continues to operate without required Discharge Permits. This fact is documented in letters from Waste Management, November 16, 1992, and Colorado Department of Health, November 17, 1992. (Attached) Colorado Department of Health, Water Quality Division personnel have indicated that despite application for the required permits, the facility is in technical violation of the rules, but they are holding further enforcement in abeyance so long as the facility continues in good faith with the application process. Weld County Health Department agrees that this is a violation of Subsection 2.1.2 of the Solid Waste Regulations and 25-8-501, Colorado Revised Statutes, (Attached), but it appears this condition is near final correction. 3. The Central Weld Sanitary Landfill continues to contaminate the groundwater. and this contamination has migrated offsite. This fact is evidenced by Waste Management in two documents: The Hydrogeologic and Geotechnical Characterization for the Central weld Sanitary Kent Hanson, Attorney at Law Central Weld County Landfill September 18, 1992 Page 2of3 approval of the plan, the application shall be amended. The regulation does not state that the Certificate of Designation shall be amended. The County must utilize its own discretion or regulation as to whether an amended Certificate of Designation is required for facilities which amend their application, but continue to perform the same type of solid waste disposal. 2. The Central Weld County Landfill received a Certificate of Designation on October 6, 1971. At that time, the state had not promulgated solid waste regulations pursuant to the Statute. Between 1968 (the date the Statute became effective) and 1972, solid waste disposal sites and facilities complied with the minimum standards set forth in the Statute. The minimum standards detailed operational standards, but did not specifically require a design and operations plan. In 1972 regulations were promulgated pursuant to the Statute. That 1972 regulation set forth the requirement that all landfills with an existing Certificate of Designation were ' grandfathered,' that is they were required to meet the minimum standards of section 3, but not the standards of section 4 (which applied to all solid waste disposal sites and facilities that were designated after the effective date of the regulation). In 1983, when the regulations were revised to their current form. The Division concurs, and certainly Subtitle D will require, that the Central Weld County Landfill must develop an enhanced design and operations plan to bring the facility up to current standards. To the Division's knowledge, no design or operations plan has ever been developed for the landfill, nor are any plans of this nature contained in the Division files. 3. It is true, that ground water contamination has been identified off -site. The County has wisely chosen to allow the facility to take over the ground water monitoring activities at the landfill, The Central Weld County Landfill has expanded the list of ground water analytes, and through this effort has revealed the presence of volatile organics in the ground water. Golder Associates has recently submitted a hyrogeologic and geotechnical characterization report detailing and summarizing recent investigations. The Division is in the process of reviewing the report, and will work with Weld County and Waste Services Corporation to obtain a satisfactory resolution to the ground water contamination issue. 4. Waste Services Corporation does intend to submit (and is currently in process Kent Hanson, Attorney at Law Central Weld County Landfill September 18, 1992 Page 3 of 3 of developing) a comprehensive site development plan, and a design and operations plans. The Division has not been informed of any pending change in operations at the Central Weld County Landfill during this interim period. 5. The Division is not aware of any existing requirement or agreement that the final elevation of the landfill may not exceed the adjacent land surface. Hopefully, this letter responds to your issues. The Division is interested in pursuing, and will pursue the ground water contamination identified at the site, and in bringing the facility up to the State I s standards. Thank -you for your letter and for the extension you were able to grant, so that an adequate response could be prepared. may be contacted at this office if you have any additional questions or concerns. C._ Aus{in N. Buckingham Geologist Hazardous Materials and Waste Management Division cc: B. Hedberg, Central Weld County Landfill B. Keirnes, Waste Services Corporation G. Kennedy, Weld County Commissioners L. Morrison, Weld County Attorney D. O 9 Sadnick, Golder Associates J. Pickle, Weld County Health Department A. Scheere, Waste Management of North America K. Schuett, Weld County Department of Planning file: SW/WLD/CENTRAL ry(y�\T�4/�'�,��y� '<,AIiJVRADO DEPARTMENT OFAHEALTH • ROY ROMER Governor PATRICIA A. NOLAN, a MPH Execu.:ve Director 11a n:touw Materials and Waste Management Division 4210 East 11th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80220-3716 (303) 331-4830 / FAX (303) 331-4401 Main Rankling, Denver (303) 322.9076 Ptannif a Mace. Demers (303) 320.1329 Fins National Bank Building. Dance (303) 3334559 Grand Junction Office (303) 24&.7196 Webb Office (719) 3434441 September 18, 1992 Kent D. Hanson Attorney at Law Clayton Center 1881 9th Street, Suite 216 Boulder, Colorado 80802 RE: Central Weld County Landfill Weld County RECEIVED 0CT 5 1992 KEN I E. nAA QN Dear Mr. Hanson: The Hazardous Materials and Waste Management Division (the Division) of the Colorado Department of Health has received and reviewed your September 11, 1992 letter regarding the Central Weld County Landfill. The following is the Division's response to the issues set forth in your letter. 1. Weld County is has no obligation under the Solid Waste Disposal Sites and Facilities Act (the Statute) to hold a public hearing for substantial changes in operations, though Weld County may if they so choose. A Certificate of Designation is issued for a specific solid waste land use (i.e. incinerator, sanitary,landfill, or impoundment), and in this case the land use is a landfill. As long as the facility is a landfill and continues to operate as such, no public hearing is required. To date, the Division has no evidence to suggest that any other solid waste operation, beside landfilling, is occurring at the site. This same issue was the subject of a law suit between FSLIC vs the City and County of Denver, the Board of County Commissioners of Arapahoe County, Waste Management of Colorado and the Colorado Department of Health (1989). If you are interested in reviewing this document, please contact the Division to make an appointment for file access. The Division does, however, concur that any redesign or planned construction which would significantly change the planned design performance of a facility is subject to Division technical review. Following a recommendation for BEFORE THE WELD COUNTY COMMISSIONERS IN THE MATTER OF THE CENTRAL WELD COUNTY LANDFILL April 5, 1993 SUMMARY OF PRESENTATION ASHTON-DANIELS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION INTRODUCTION The Ashton -Daniels Neighborhood Association is a citizens' group of Weld County residents, including families adversely affected by the improper activities of the owners and operators of the Central Weld County Landfill since its inception in 1971. The landfill operation has been conducted illegally since 1971, and its certificate to operate should be revoked. This proceeding, occurring on April 5, 1993, is to determine whether "a reasonable ground for belief in the existence of facts warranting the proceedings complained of" exists. ("Weld County, Procedures for Probable Cause Hearings," dated March 23, 1992.) Thus/ this proceeding is not an adjudicatory hearing on the merits. Its purpose is to determine whether an order to show cause shall be issued, by the Commissioners to the owners and operators of the Central Weld County Landfill, as to why the landfill's certificate of designation should not be revoked. ;':2J.06'. // The documentary evidence (see Ashton -Daniels Neighborhood Association Exhibits A.D.-1 through A.D.- 45) alone is enough to justify and require issuance of the order to show cause. Since the first dumpload of waste was deposited in the landfill, each owner and operator has dumped there in violation of the certificate of designation, contrary to the land use zoning laws and regulations of Weld County and the State of Colorado, causing a great public nuisance and environmental depredations. on January 18, 1993 (Exhibit A.D.-30), and again on February 15, 1993 (Exhibit A.D.-31), the Ashton - Daniels Neighborhood Association requested a hearing. On January 14, 1993 (Exhibit A.D.-28) and January 18, 1993 (Exhibit A.D.-29), the Weld County Health Department and the Weld County Department of Planning Services cited Waste Services, Inc., a subsidiary of waste Management/ Inc., for violations of Colorado's Solid Waste Disposal Sites and Facilities Act (the "Act"), C.R.S. $ 30-20-101 et seq./ and Weld County's Land use, zoning, and special use requirements. As of March 30, 1993 (Exhibit A.D.-30), the facility continued to be in non-compliance, and a hearing on revocation of the certificate of designation should be 2 5321.061_ /z scheduled, resulting in a decision to revoke the certificate of designation and require closure and remedial action pursuant to the laws and regulations of Weld County, the State of Colorado, and the United States. I. SUMMARY OF FACTS WARRANTING ISSUANCE OF AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AS TO WHY THE CERTIFICATE OF DESIGNATION FOR THE CENTRAL WELD COUNTY LANDFILL SHOULD NOT BE REVOKED Pursuant to a public hearing held on September 22, 1971, before the Weld County Commissioners (Exhibit A.D.-6, Transcript of Hearing 9-22-71), a certificate of designation (Exhibit A.D.-9) was issued for the Central Weld County Landfill under the Act and under Weld County's land use and zoning authorities. Siting of the landfill could occur, under then existing legal authority, only as a use by special review. Prior to the September 22, 1971 hearing, the state's Solid Waste Act had been amended (as set forth more fully below) to require review and approval by the county, as to land use, and by the state, as to minimum sanitary, engineering, environmental and operational requirements. 3 On July 15, 1971 (Exhibit A.D.-1), Mr. Orville Stoddard, P.E., of the Colorado Department of Health requested the engineetring report required by the State Solid Waste Disposal Act as amended by the Colorado General Assembly earlier that year. The applicant for the landfill certificate of designation successfully resisted the pre -submission of "an engineering report concerning the design and operation of the site" unless he had assurance that the Weld County Commissioners would grant him the land use approval (Exhibit A.D.-3.) At the September 22, 1971 public hearing (as more fully set forth below and in the presentations made at this hearing of April 5, 1993 by the Weld County citizens), cogent and compelling testimony was presented (Exhibit A.D.-6) that the csosen site was not suitable for location of a landfill dae to groundwater conditions prevalent in the immediate vicinity. Nevertheless, the certificate of designation issued, based on express representations of the applicant that no groundwater contamination would occur, that the facility's life would be 15 to 20 years at most, that disposal of the waste would be in the 4 1"1 OE- / • • ground and not above the surface of the ground, that operations would cease if groundwater were contacted, and that the landfill surface would be returned to farmable ground compatible with surrounding agricultural ground within 15 to 20 years. An express condition of the Weld County Commissioners' resolution of October 6, 1971, granting the certificate of designation was: 1. That any sanitary landfill facility 12 be installed shall be approved by the mate Department of Health. (Exhibit A.D.-8.) This condition was expressly included as an integral part of Weld County's land use decision because the applicant represented that he would not commence operation until the engineering and operations approval of the State Health Department was obtained. This approval was to be based on an engineering report to be submitted by the applicant, taking into account sections 3 and 4 of the state's regulations which were then being developed (see Exhibit A.D.-3) and which were finalized early in 1972 (Exhibit A.D.-4), not long after weld County issued the certificate of designation based on the explicit condition of Health Department approval prior to construction of the landfill and 5 initiation of disposal activities. Again, please note that condition number 1 of the October 6, 1971 resolution is that state approval shall be obtained for the "sanitary landfill facility to be installed." (Exhibit A.D.-8.) No engineering report was submitted or approved prior to the commencement of disposal operations, and the certificate of designation should and must be revoked for violation of a material condition precedent. This site is not suitable, and never was suitable, for disposal of waste because of prevailing groundwater conditions in the area. (See Exhibits A.D.-6, A.D.- 41', A.D.-422, A.D.-433 and A.D.-444.) It is probable 'Glenn Billings, former Chairman of the Weld County Commissioners states that one of the reasons he voted against the landfill in 1971 was, "A high water table is not conducive such as the one around the Milliken (Central Weld County) Landfill) to any landfill operations." (Exhibit A.D.-41.) 2Albion Carlson, a trained geologist and environmental scientist for the State of New Mexico, states, "The footprint of Central Weld Landfill is located in historic year-round wetlands and slough area, draining into the Pig Thompson River and into historic Spomer Lake, adjecent wetlands, man-made ponds and ditches which function as areas of significant ground water recharge . . ." (Exhibit A.D.-42.) 'According to the evaluation prepared by the Colorado Department of Health regarding landfills in Weld County, "All existing landfill sites are located in aquifer recharge areas, 6 /6 • • that preparation of a proper engineering report, upon review of the State Health Department pursuant to sections 3 and 4 of the regulations applicant agreed to abide by, would have resulted in no approval by the State Health Department. Throughout two decades, the owners of the landfill have violated the condition precedent for landfilling at this site, an approved engineering design and operations plan (Exhibit A.D.-39), with the consequence that all waste at the site has been disposed of illegally, to the detriment of the laws of Weld County and the State of Colorado and their residents and citizens. Only one remedy can suffice to serve the public interest and uphold the law inviolable against violation of express representations in gaining land use approval: that it be revoked as a result of a show flood plains or irrigated farmlands or are near population centers . . . The overall drainage pattern in Weld County is dendritic resulting in a high degree of interrelationship between streams and rivers. Pollution of any part may result in pollution of the whole . . ." (Exhibit A.D.-43.) 'The U.S.G.S map demonstrates that in the area in which the Central weld County Landfill is located, "Liquid wastes or leachates from solid waste could be introduced directly into the ground -water system by water moving through landfills . . . resulting in degradation or pollution of the ground water." (Exhibit A.D.-44.) 7 cause hearing. II. THIS FACILITY IS IN VIOLATION OF COLORADO'S ACT AND WELD COUNTY'S LAND USE AUTHORIZATION The original Solid Waste Disposal Act of 1967 required any person who wished to operate a solid waste disposal facility to "make application to the Board of County Commissioners" of the county in which the facility is located. 1967 Session Laws, p. 759. The application was required to include the location of the facility, the type of facility, type of processing to be used, "such as sanitary landfill, composting, or incineration," the hours of operation, the method of supervision, the rates to be charged, "and such other information as may be required by the Board of County Commissioners." Id. at 759-760. The 1967 Act also provided that "designation of approved solid waste disposal sites or facilities shall be discretionary with the Board of County Commissioners, subject to judicial review. . ." Id. at 760. The original Act also required all disposal sites to comply with the health laws, standards, rules and regulations of the State Health Department and the water pollution control commission, as well as all applicable zoning laws and ordinances." Id. at 761. 8 P^ i /1 In 1971, the Act was amended, effective July 1, 1971. Changes to the application provision required that the application contain scientific data required by the State Department of Health regulations. See C.R.S. S 30-20-103 (1). It also provided for review of the application by the department based upon criteria established by the State Board of Health, State water Pollution Control Commission, and the Air Pollution Control Commission. jsl. The amendments added the further requirement that, prior to issuance of the Certificate of Designation, the Board of County Commissioners had to ensure that: 1) the application had been reviewed by the Department of Health; 2) the Department of Health had approved or disapproved the application; and 3) the proposed facility conforms to the comprehensive county land use plan, if any. See C.R.S. § 30-20-104 (3) (a). The provision provided for notice of public hearing for review of all pertinent information before the county commissioners. The minimum standards provision of the 1967 Act was amended to provide, in part: 9 IT "A site and facility operated as a sanitary landfill shall provide means of finally disposing of solid wastes on land in a manner to minimize nuisance conditions. . .and shall provide compacted fill material, adequate cover with suitable material and surface drainage designed to prevent ponding and water and wind erosion, prevent water and air pollution. . ." .gs C.R.S. $ 30-20-110. The Act, as amended, gave the Commissioners the power to revoke a Certificate of Designation for failure to comply with all applicable laws, ordinances and resolutions or with any provision of the Act. agg C.R.S. S 30-20-112. In this case, the Commissioners exercised their discretion based on the representations made to it by the applicant at the September 22, 1971 public hearing. The application was a one -page form that provided no information regarding design and operation of the landfill. (Exhibit A.D.-2.) Applicant represented that all pertinent engineering and operational information and assurances would be forthcoming if land use approval were given. The representations were both material and materially misleading, induced issuance of the certificate of designation, and must be strictly enforced as binding on all subsequent operation, operators, and successors in interest. The 1971 public hearing transcript demonstrates 10 .9.2106't dzo numerous representations made by the applicant to the Commissioners and the community that the landfill would not contaminate underground or surface waters. Repeatedly, the applicant assured the Commissioners that if it encountered water, it would intercept and divert the water to avoid contamination. Transcript at pp. 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 30, 31, 34, 36, 37 & 38. According to the applicant's testimony, "Anything that occurs and drains from the fill area will be merely surface water and seepage water that is in good condition." Transcript at p. 11. When Ralph Waldo, a community member opposing the opposition, asserted that the "whole hillside [where the landfill would be located] is seeping," the applicant responded, "we are going to intercept that water." Transcript at p. 13.5 One community member in particular, Guy Shable, was very insistent that water seepage would be an unsolvable problem if the landfill were located at the proposed site. See transcript at p. 34. According to Mr. Shable, (who spent his entire life living and farming in the immediate area of the proposed site,] 5The Weld County Commissioners based their approval of the application on their belief in assurances that there would be no water contamination. "The important thing that we will be looking at, of course, is to make sure that water pollution does not occur from this operation in any way, shape or form." Transcript at pp. 30-31. 11 21.06' fir intercepting the seepage water would not work: "But you're not going to be able to cut it [seepage water) all oft." Transcript at p. 35. When the applicant claimed that the landfill would not contaminate groundwater flowing below the site, Shable again challenged. "It's got to come up through your landfill. Why won't it come up through your landfill?" Transcript at p. 37. The applicant again assured the Commissioners it could intercept the water and divert it around the landfill. Transcript at p. 38. Finally, after enumerating his concerns relating to water contamination, Mr. Waldo stated that the opponents of the landfill would like conditions placed on the certificate of designation to ensure that the landfill does not contaminate surface and ground water in the area. Transcript at p. 18. The applicant assured the Commissioners that if the landfill complied with all applicable regulations, water quality would not be a problem. $ee Transcript at p. 18. Not content with just the assurances of the applicant, the Weld County Commissioners required, as condition number 1 for installation of the landfill facility, that approval first be obtained by the Health Department. (Exhibit A.D.-8.) 12 litaliT4 net 92. Current information is that groundwater has been contaminated by the landfill operation. (Exhibits A.D.-28, A.D.-29, A.D.-32, A.D.-41.) Of course, this is not surprising. At the 1971 hearing, citizens of weld County overwhelmingly attested to the boggy conditions of the site and surrounding area. So much dispersed water percolates through the area that it is impossible to capture it all. This information was available to the applicant, if not before the hearing, then certainly at the hearing and thereafter. The applicant chose to ignore the citizens' concerns, continuously asserting that it would have no trouble capturing and diverting the water. Additionally, the applicant represented at the hearing that the landfill would not exceed the normal grade and contour of the surrounding agricultural land. Transcript at p. 17. The operation plan as presented to the Commissioners was premised on digging down, not piling up. "(W]e're talking about going to a depth of maybe 50 feet . . . we need depth for a landfill." Transcript at pp. 24-25. In fact, the lifespan of the site as represented at the hearing was premised on digging down. The applicant represented that the anticipated lifespan of 13 • the landfill would be approximately 15 years, based on an 80 acre site with a depth of 45 feet. Transcript at p. 28. According to the applicant, if the geography of the site permitted digging deeper than 45 feet, then it would likely keep the landfill open beyond 15 years. But if they could not dig that deep, the lifespan of the site wouldbe shortened proportionately. "Now if it turns out that shale and sandstone is in there to the point to where it is not practical to move it, we've got to figure to balance the job out sooner . . II Transcript at p. 28. Operators of the landfill never excavated to a depth anywhere approaching 50 feet. Rather, they have disposed of garbage at the site to a level far in excess of the normal grade in comparison to surrounding agricultural land uses. The landfill has become a steadily rising mound of trash, creating a public nuisance and contaminating the environment, far exceeding the promised 15 year life. The applicant represented that the land upon closure would be returned to "a good piece of farm ground," (transcript at p. 7), so that farming could be recommenced there (transcript at p. 8). 14 Now is the time to enforce this express representation by remediation and closure orders pursuant to a noticed public hearing on revocation of the certificate of designation. CONCLUSION A show cause order should be issued to Waste Services, Inc. to show why the certificate of designation should not be revoked for 1) failure to submit an engineering report and design and operations plan and receive the approval of the State Department of Health prior to land fill installation, 2) creation of a public nuisance, 3) violation of the minimum sanitary, engineering, and operational standards of the Colorado Department of Health, and 4) non-compliance with Weld County land use, zoning, and special use resolutions and approvals. Dated this 5th day of April, 1993. Respectfully submitted, Gregory J. Hobbs, Jr., #`0009' Jennifer Russell, /22047 Hobbs, Trout & Raley, P.C. 1775 Sherman St., Suite 1300 Denver, Colorado 80203 Tele: (303) 861-1963 Fax: (303) 832-4465 ATTORNEYS FOR ASHTON-DANIELS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION 15 • i Al2 GREELEY (Cola.) TRIBUNE Tuesday, April 6, 1993 FROM PAGE Al LANDFILL moment with finality," said Lee Morrison, a Weld County attorney. "The standard for this bearing is: Are there reasonable grounds. based on the facts you've heard, to call a show -cause hearing." he said. Waste Services had argued a show -cause hearing was not necessary. "Even if a violation occurs it does not nec- essarily warrant a show -cause hearing," said Arthur Roy, attorney for Waste Services. "Even if the evidence does show probable cause, it is based on evidence we produced, we promptly showed to the proper authori- ties. and we offered a plan to deal with the problem." Roy said. Waste Services has found volatile organic compounds in groundwater about 200 feet south of the landfill, which is about 11 miles ' east of Milliken. The toxic compounds also have been found at an underdrain's discharge point near Spomer Lakes south of the land- fill. The volatile organic compounds appear- ing at the underdrain's discharge apparently are vaporizing in the atmosphere and are not present in Spomer Lakes, according Col- orado Department of Health officials attend- ing the meet,ng. Volatile '' r;anic compounds present in the landfill are typical of substances used in com- mon household products such as cleaning so- lutions and aerosols. The landfill also is charged with operating the underdrain without a discharge permit, a violation of state regulations. Waste Services is in the process of applying for the discharge permit with the state. The Ashton -Daniels Neighborhood Asso- ciation, formed by landfill neighbors worried about problems at the landfill, also claims the dump lacks proper permits to operate. In 1971. Earl Moffat, the original appli- LANDAU. AT A GLANCE The Weld County Health Depart- ment claims the following laws and regulations have been violated by Waste Services Corp.. operators of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill: • The operators have not submitted a complete design and operations plan. ■ The operators have not obtained the proper discharge permit for an underdrain on landfill property. The underdrain is carrying small quanti- ties of toxic volatile organic com- pounds ott the landfill property. • Groundwater in a section in the southwestern part of the landfill has been contaminated with volatile or- ganic compounds, N Solid waste has come in contact with groundwater in a northern por- tion of the landfill. —Staff Reports cant for the landfill. promised to file an engi- neering report with the state after receiving a permit for operation, according to Greg Hobbs, attorney for the Ashton -Daniels group. The plan was never submitted to the state. and Hobbs maintains the failure to submit the plan violates the standards on which the land- fill was permitted. "What happened to the original engineer- ing plan? Mr. Earl Moffat's application for a landfill was made contingent on submittal of an engineering report. Mr. Moffatinduced the commissioners to issue a land -use permit contingent on the filing of an engineering re- port that was never filed," Hobbs said. Waste Services said the engineering plan was never listed as a standard for operation in 1971 when the landfill was permitted, and operational and design plans for landfills were not required by the state in 1971. Weld Service executives also noted clos- ing the landfill now would allow the compa- ny to escape stricter closing procedures required under new federal regulations effec- tive in October. The increased federal regulations were the primary reason Brad Keirnes said his family sold its business in July 1991 to Waste Man- agement Inc., the world's largest waste dis- posal company with profits of $606 million in 1991, "We as a family took a frank look at our ability to meet the law. But we realized we needed added environmental expertise and increased financial ability: be said. If the landfill is ordered closed in October. it would have to close under stricter Envi- ronmental Protection Agency regulations than those in effect now. Whatever regulations are required, many residents around the landfill said they would like to sec it closed as soon as possible. "What's going on here is we are faced with an unsanitary, unlawful landfill in sog- gy ground," said Jane Carlson. "You bought this problem. Now it's your responsibility to fix it." she told Waste Ser- vices executives, "I don't see bow making the problem worse before cleaning it up would make it any better." Waste Services has proposed operating the landfill for an additional 12 years. • • Th Dear Mr. Hall, Fm sure you just didn't understand that trash sitting in this water can cause bad pollution. Please vote next time for the river and my generation. Sincerly, Tom Daniels Age 13 23732'/ :R2r/5 l a•C0 80543 �xfi,d,t3 :to6t / i gualf didaywmc P!!4 14tb Settee Read Oat,. &4s4 1063! , (303)353423f Weld County Commissioners 915 10th Street P.O. Box 758 Greeley, CO 80632 • ... April 8, 1993 Dear Commissioners; I was saddened to read in the paper the other night that you had voted to have the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill move on to the next level of your county hearings. I can't believe that after hearing the factual evidence for the landfill that you are willing to waste our tax money on a second, and more expensive, hearing. The costs of this hearing will make it back to the tax payer in one way or another. This is shameful use of your elected power. I applaud George Hall for his courageous and sane vote. It is time for lawmakers to stand up to environmental scare -mongers and take a lucid approach to environmental concerns. Kowtowing to special interest groups, and using taxpayer money to do it, is unacceptable. I trust that you will not allow this charade to continue. I appreciate the safety, inexpensive costs, and care that our landfills in northern Colorado exercise. Please don't let one man's eccentric behavior, coupled with the power of a hand full of irrational eco-fanatics, deprive us of a safe, convenient, and affordable waste facility. Please vote in favor of the Central Weld Landfill and allow them to continue to operate in accordance with all relevant regulatory guidelines. Sincerely yours, Randy Adhmson t i April 7,1993 Dear Mrs. Harbert, Ms. Kirkmeyer, Mr. Webster, Mr. Baxter, Thank you for voting for the hopes and dreams of my generation to have a good life with clean water! Fit always remember your vote on April Sth! • .32 WOLV' CO Your TOM Daniels Age 13 A. Ex/17;6;71 I St at Centre Weld Sstttiy �e�t ettr surface and 0 M `.., {i,a the Si . Thompson & Platte Name fprirt0—i4 . ►acute an. r SODA TELEPHONE, Nt -A1,0111ESS Citizens Concerned Over?`Water it Please close and remediate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect our surface and ground water. soil. & the Big Thompson & Platte River Name (or inp_LQ wse,S_._ - i2 da,5 -.: Signature 43. _ , Citizens Concerned Over 1 J CJ W tsr X it i l +- �'�. C C� ` I e (print) lig HO Citizen* ; Con c.iced ' • _ ' v lAl*ter Please close and remediate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect our surface and ground water, soil, & the Big Thompson & Plane Rivers. Name (pant) i_zonasas. 4y f Signatures Oly:; won Citizen, Concerned Please close and remediate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect our surface and ground water, soil, & the Big Thompson & Platte Rivers. Name (print) 0 ,�(_�; ,'_i _ SignaturetvizSaii Citizens Concerned Over wen 0 0 -CD n'" 106 Please dose and re ate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect ow surface and ground water, soil, ,& the Big Thompson a Platte Rivers, Name (print}, Signature,. Sp7 of 4. TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS Citizens Concerned Over Water Please close and at Central ; Weld Be our surface and ,ground Big Thompson & Platte iife the pollution R Landfi l Protect dAter. soil; & the Were. CD Please close and remediate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. ;,Protect RIO surface and ground water, soil, the 9i'p Thompson & Platte Rives, N.M. (print) _alga -ki 5Fgr4ature__ " yt1.a1G TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS Cl*'aans Concornad Over •Watm( DEAR COMMISSIONERS: Please close and rernedlate" at ;Central Weld Sanitary. Len our surface and ground watt?, Elie",Thompson & '01S4 1: Ne r nt): Sign'attue. ,357- TELEPHONE NUMBER titlana COOS0**. CCC ter --2,1.1 R Please close and remediate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect our suilace and ground water, soil, & the Big Thompson & //Platte /Rivers. (print) LZ,4f.-(f1G Name �^ Signature�„,@�� =aerfs Concerned ®tray Water GGG 2: r1`i61_ Pita, . arose and renteglate the pollution Central Weld StoM044 Landfill. Protect our surface and ground, Water, soil, & the Big Thompson & Platte ;;Revers. Name (print) ALL. ?.L.23.a signature _C •-'nnv Citizens Concerned Over Water Pleas. dose and , renttithe pollution at Central Weld 9�ariihry Landfill. Protect our meson Ind proms, watsr, soil, & the Big Thompson $ Platte Rivers. CCC n 2',d nn/ Please close and remediate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect our surface and ground water, soil, & the Big Thompson & Platte Rivers. Name (print)__ Signature �t vfc. S o iV Minns Concerned Over Water Please dote and rennediate the pollution at Central WedSlinfiti Landfill. Protect our surface and grouts water, soil, & the Big Thompson & p1#N!i ,Rivera. Name. (pr Signature's;. C1111.0e . Camp Oar ; %flier 0 rnrn CcG • s Please close and remediate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect our surface and ground water, soil, & the Big Thompson & Platte Rivers. Name (print)4,c,_4t Signature,✓t— Citizens Concerned Over Water DEAR COM1 3 t' Please close and rem*4tits" she; paliutiquf- •. at Central WOW Sanitary :Landfill. Protect our Surface and ground water, soil, & the Big Thompson $ Platte silvers. (cc_ cc, Please close and remediate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect our surface and ground water, soil, & the Big Thompson & Platte Rivers. Name (prl ) 6o.-b-aa�!ct, etis Signature_ $a, ,,37 Citizens Concerned Over Water CCC n^4 flC'! • • Please close at Central WSd our eufft► a kl Thom Noma <(pri $ignatura Citizens Cone Pica*. ' d at Central 'Wald our surface and! Big Thompson St Name (prim; Signature._ Cr c_ Name (pr'int, .mt t $igniturt. Ca* R.; ir. c Ctc) Citizens Conte, Please close and re raydlltte the pollution al Central Weld Sftint Jt Landfill. Protect our surface and ground: water, soil, & the Big Thompson & Pis*" Aware. Name (Print) Signature _s__tt1+rt. DEAR C0MMI ONERS: Please close and vemediata the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect our surface ` and ipround water, soil. & the Big .Thompsoni & 'Platte Rivers. Name; flak SiQgtittrre., ° 4 she f s TELEPHONE.$1,11.01ER OR ADDRSS1a 0tulzen♦ -Concerned Over Water DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. NAME _ 1 LdVMGr4w+ t"0 a 5 BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) 535—�kLC6 TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS DEAR COMMISSIONERS: 0 1J CJ As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. ?Now Cm ( tn. C- H AME C-) c^B \L1QS /') g smi1 h° BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) f7&T TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE STEIN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. `17fyv.. n%aFo NAME UU BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) /U.10 Hwy .ffoCsy TELEPHONE NUMBER OR1DDRESS <_ ' r, Vn DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. AME y ILK "�' L2s cZL—( 11. BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) -'S(c TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS kfl DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. ELL!S NAME thLt k- (decor -- BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) e,4fC 99 TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. , nhnr, NAME BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) TELEPHONE HUMBER OR DDRESS • • DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Service;; Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. el/he At Sitea NAME 439- 38 f -- , greehi & tonit BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) 35Z- 2.602, TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatoryy-refit ements. BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) TOWN OF EATON 223 First Street P. O. Sox 946 Eaton, Colorado 80615 TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. NAME BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) 7,ts„,a TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS 66/3 • • DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. 2,4 P9"1:0A, 5;K 1 U' BUS NAME (if applicable) 7gs a yge TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS DEAR COMMISSIONERS: O As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. -pier A4/4/114144 BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) /Y71-702._ c -v ea- 0' � com63% TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE snE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. • : 67-60-rvx'-p`-el NAME � 2US'%r-eL-^'Cr/P 6(O. BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) ?0(0 ,SO> 'CrPP/ayy 3-1777 TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADD ESS • As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements.' Z NAME BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) s sn aft , !".4 6/21. -- TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance wih all applicable regulatory requirements. NAME BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) 7.5 ' TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. Fr; 7 coAs7Aken,i, BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) 3S~ -- Z33 6 TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS • • NAME DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. N/e Sr, <j -,¢ 7 IN . , w: /I BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) -$"o `/J-- ;71)- .22 A7J TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS DEAR COMMISSIONERS: 0 As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. Ce Nt A. ftel NAME 4T r iSitv,c.e BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) &3— 77i -..4// TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. NAME ? Pomt2 S-r7t34.C-5 BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) S$y—z-oo/ TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS 92,10€1. DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. S NAME BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) TE EP NUMBER OR ADDRESS 0 DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. Roy/ 8eItem s NAME BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) Sac - TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. NAME BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) TFiFp�NUMBER OR ADDRESS • P 668 s.net DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned use of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. bWA -R9 - NAME �E f2c)E S i7?,AA{ S?a.(7,6E :424-a‘' BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) 3n- 3 a_ 512i 6Weczz5), TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) `-3572- TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS DEAR COMMISSIO As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with a�ll�//ap"p�licable re ulatory requirements. (.�sseag NAME BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) ?/?-v ?iota.-. TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS 9196' • • DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE N AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. (mai cc, (apici# NAME y $4 UtAJA.,01 BUSINESS N (if applicable) app ) (303),58?— 6 '3 TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. fiG2.4g-/t (Th ZeZE-C, NAME C BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. ,at 4‘g-fre-- BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS 9:1061, • • DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. y^S/G iled ea.. — NAME BUSINESS NAME (if -47%- applicable) TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS o. DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary,, Landfill, I URGE you to allow -waste Services . Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER anal#, accordance with all applicable regulatory requiremsnta: -; kernie NAME eArcl,erl BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) 3SdaNd o TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS J ) ,c .01:141I1 1..^-c sv.Y ?s 0/56 ✓.... 9S.% • DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. k en 7:414terx> BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) g3 0 979 TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS DEAR COMMISSIONERS: 0 • •' • As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. c n,.e, t e a. ,6,,.,t NAME • 8. BUSINESS A (if 2 cepc (if applicable) J3 9-sivy 5 TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. NAME BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS 92106' • • DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and itr accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. —Dou3k ss C-0 NAIE BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) 5 01-1050. a TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS DEAR COMMISSIONERS: :? As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERA'T'E THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in -accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. ) NAME lA m NI MAMK Q1L t€ftS BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) 'Is -co -88(08 TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to r., *NTT ILIZI2SESR,TE TNF SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. oA24 ,f¢ „ pu1— o.t their to>1o;4T1 --Creedalr -to re" ifetVeu 11 ct NAME Sio /i sr C>cr/ey c-' e'rrrnaldeAi.r4 la.wry BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) - \/1 3S/o-/766 0 TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS /ode • • DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE sni IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. ("xi, .h BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) tyr j 3 5--6: S`/ TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. //n(/y 61 /770(216 NA ME A tiC Yf /ni() "/nom ( 1c4" BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) -74fs5 TELEPHONE N MSER DR ADDRESS DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a -concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. , NAME BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) 732- 9.2,i{ TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS ndo • • DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE ME SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory.nuirements. - plagv NAME .0) MINES applih) o yc / 8DSt'v 686-77.3.6 TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS 666 0 s STATE OF: COLORADO COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Dedicated to protecting and improving the health and environment of the people of Colorado 4300 Cherry Creek Dr. S. Laboratory Building Denver, Colorado 80212.1 530 42101 I I Ih Avenue Phone: (303) 692-2000 Denver, Colorado 80220-3716 I (303) 691.4700 March 31, 1993 Ms. Sharon Davis Western International Music, Inc. 3707 65th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80634-9626 Re: Central Weld Landfill Dear Ms. Davis: Roy Romer C.ovemor Patricia A. Nolen, MD, mm Lxecuove Director I wish to take this opportunity to respond to your inquiry dated March 6, 1993 concerning the Central Weld Landfill. In response to your first concern, the Central Weld Landfill was reviewed in accordance with statutes and regulations that were in place at that point in time. The use of a liner was not required. A landfill is usually allowed to take all wastes from a municipality except for statutorily designated hazardous wastes and radioactive wastes. Non -friable asbestos wastes, various household pesticides and similar materials can and do go into landfills. It was not until 1980 that some of the current restrictions on commercial wastes such as pesticides became law. Sludges may not be accepted unless they are dry and they do not contain hazardous levels of metals of the constituents. The discovery of low level volatile organic compounds in the groundwater at the southeast corner of the site has been fairly recent. The allegation of wastes placed into 5 to 25 feet of standing water is contrary to evidence presented to this department. Seven piezometers were installed in 1991 to measure the level of groundwater and three indicate that groundwater levels in the base of the landfill are as follows: Piezometer Jan. 1991 April 1992 Dec. 1992 TP-1 +1.92 ft. +6.34 ft. +3.03 ft. TP -6 +0.42 ft. -2.75 ft. -2.67 ft. TP-7 dry dry +8.14 ft. These numbers indicate water levels into the base of the trash. The department has asked for the installation of three more piezometers in the affected area to better clarify this issue. L1/4_.kicH1--A 444 *,�Jc vMd Piper Sharon Davis March 31, 1993 Page 2 In reference to the special waste plan that has been given to the department, in June 1992 this document was hand delivered with a verbal request that it be kept confidential as proprietary business information. A letter was sent to Waste Management at the request of the Office of the Attorney General asking that the company affirm their claim to confidentiality per statute (see enclosed copy). The department, by law, must honor the company's claim until such time a response is received. The fact sheet is public information and as such may be reproduced and distributed by anyone. It was drafted by the solid waste staff. Staff then asked the Water Quality Control Division, Weld County Health Department and Waste Management to review the draft. Comments that were received were considered when the final draft was prepared by staff. I hope that this response addresses your questions and concerns. Sincerely, -.atit e:442),& •'S'%aiA _ Mb , Ma t+ Patricia A. Nolan, MD, MPH Executive Director PAN:nr enclosure cc: Governor Roy Romer Senator Hank Brown Representative Wayne Allard Representative Dave Owen Weld County Commissioners John Pickle, Weld County Health Dept. Chuck Cunliffe, Weld County Dept. of Planning Richard Evans, City Manager Solid Waste Program, CDH (SW WLD CEN) ATTENDANCE RECORD HEARINGS ARE AS FOLLOWS ON THIS . — DAY OF DOCKET !t DOCKET U DOCKET If DOCKET U PLEASE write or print your name legibly, your address and the DOCKET U (as listed above) or the name of the applicant of the hearing you are attending. 1993: NAME 2(20 Qw;u., aed L/4 ,.erlet G72,'' 4�< bets <<� �•� A Lit )17g442 sal . ADDRESS ItrgiceigThEi son k" /ter, /..55-5- arrre 7F� f9 C9 P o q P1;, it G�-4,4,r jul i< , J> 4'c1q, 4xd--/ /St' L .f, J�ra.c,u '. /&)Ptcq 127 F6757 2- / 4e• ._1 +c4 %/2rM{ A 4'/Z v ( c-/ (77i7z 'hi t -3 Ai5Ct�r � 12 c �Gb�`� -emd LAO Jo.ssn S/Qci 5 0 • f tl 14're iL c ( t aye` s a,c, f,-- ci J// .1011-€7 -e-co-ir` / 2 6 /y 40v/se /30r iz 5 c'. /Ire.. 12_ Eiz f -adz 33.n Lit; /Q L. ��i.�//rti P0.124 r Co:-o'tQvz3u 7>err; eP,4feht`z7W Sn ewA/A el, Lt?AV ' -rr rriereitereca'r.• Ore, S YVC%v4 ' 8O.z 7t 6 -5 -1e --064K_ 6i o ,.tRA 11 , iSyr.e gdo,k) ,rt r ve. 1 / n� ! 1.., /! lL�/ ✓l . r'. Cr r' l f ,� ,.C aic fv &c /G .c:Z‘720/.13 \�l/L'-< 37CPS I co<I c, et/4/A 1,2tt:— &.' . d. to �lCL—c Jeo r rte-- i t viar✓r.-t 42, _ / ' 'C-t� /(3ccC-A;3,.u�Cs-1 s D.4v.,- So LT) I r , L„�, ,� L, J c [4 et r fc.ecc C x h rid z 931061 • • ATTENDANCE RECORD HEARINGS ARE AS FOLLOWS ON THIS DAY OF 1993; DOCKET a DOCKET a DOCKET a DOCKET It PLEASE write or print your name legibly, your address and the DOCKET I1 (as listed above) or the name of the applicant of the hearing you are attending. E ADDRESS '7.7'X/fled, 44 7/q/- /C/` Ivv (0 C la b' 7'7 Sq ; 1OG3 73t 7 -& /-7 Till tile // /L12,67k _ ,{ 6 v (lDe- 479,9 1,3 Atm__ _ 0ctisa (0211..,, 4/I ;2LA--1- J%,pi sic/ 'iy✓/ c? 7/9/ 4L s_ & AAA C1 v4' .; 1. 1 y, 5 ic-lf e‘s !l, k<r, Ct o6-- 113 Cvi q,cc Ka' AQ,.1ccze La 140 1V?S YiF%tct�-r; &,., c&o?'cy z n / i Agg1m" U mil As9Azeiv 9-fG6ccL��vcn, 074 / 3 � C.�,) csDr.�'7 & 'P(enMart - cp (,p f+�1C V St,ord c' (�(/ ,`LG tin; rr . C e c. a d S reo•S2t t 7)1 i S�up7"�- /0 953 (a C/L s a J4/ Ltiicelt ca Y.T 'p Ark C QZ4NSa /V To 1:711- 1 4, X06 32-O ? 1y '7 6{f,a 4 7iy ll�z /'cJ 64 Y � Z-7167.5 K 1 `, ta _ifittLtKcnt Cv Ea '/5 cL�}1 5-1 1765joah Au5- 6vep(ely CC2 .3ei'zt c /7'627 /I 1 /1/ /et fc ;06'/0 Z07i IJ M4', St qlc 2u y r_to fLJti34' r � 1 L� ",'/,/ IL/ I' i c2 ,n 2 1,c,; 7 76/4;q1) Prviiitcc s`5 /Iair << C,, e -ice r �� 9x1061 ATTENDANCE RECORD HEARINGS ARE AS FOLLOWS ON THIS DAY OF 1993: DOCKET II DOCKET ft DOCKET ft DOCKET 4 PLEASE write or print your name legibly, your address and the DOCKET N (as listed above) or the name of the applicant of the hearing you are attending. Cocczco 1.tns Y3"1cDbk&-v, ADDRESS if�AYTEIBING Si ,def //a�//3� 7 ut''C 6t eley,CotCU3I LL 272)'/7 trrL-/uq ley (o Toi s4-6 A 742 T' 7 4 Cy�� [ D cc / 931061 • frftoags , - SA N/ u NF (6,6( ) froo Ph S5 oc/4 Tvoki cse.prp'r'aQ s- r- 6A-2_ ASEAT- aN - pa-N(TELE 1 i-rs SP -' A- rt, (3oO Pc vei-C-f-z. r040 SP‘/ -75t.2 •z_.3 OMicible-L 7L7/6 -7-s ".(1) i<d) !45/770/j- to - 9Z©o to .49th- Cr? C-zREE.c y 1 C0 gO63q a3 /5" SY `6_ .a e . ce e_ ero& /'`1 931061 I S ---t1 A tfo. A/ &/eQ 4s44,i ,i _Cedi sh+ow 1 M .Acli;td j9„,eLS 02_73? Say Shams ,4s4fo,v- Kati if Lc ec, Liea r:O z a_ 931061 • • ,1 `dam �62GG7'rJ'r''u�z� rSear, 4z cZ, Cental-tis c, //Po 'n I on")�lc�, en s .2 T732, /17:0 TO IV -_Do.n,e,l,5 CQ qc C4 n\ 3 %� 6re(s wechear /wed LEc ---1 2 74ke y 0,07 3o1-4Szi 4-/8 gam Gz. 6-t 3/ 35'3-335/ 2oy� as 931061 • ir-oR] SEwN'S &. &-Labit (79z7 E. 13etcet. e4, '(.6OIS 303 444- (cc) 900 5ecrr ctn, u'se 4s -Pc Pcc,.4.E ee & st7 c3c 3) t fse - x"438 <Q-A+ 721a,✓z5ovz t4-0 Da., e, S€C Is PART 0 tit �NiE4; qrche ''AcecQ.efi- Co £5030 . L(YG -O6OO Q 931061 • Mt/ v /Ait 11 %4ace;O %2: i "ed-rnintelle N-tlixcL -7; e GG l E3 • qKwts74 / ,,, 931061 • 5771/4, fV PA —VS 3707 A✓a GR,EFLGyc co 8-o63�i taetee, 5 -„Lace, �oor c1/244_, //oq CLA PO 8x 723 40-fr £sY jDrl c-ioPnis e- 931061 • RESOLUTION RE: ACTION OF BOARD AT PROBABLE CAUSE HEARING CONCERNING SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT #116 - WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION. C/O WASTE MANAGEMENT WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, on April 5, 1993. a Probable Cause Hearing was held before the Board to consider setting a Show Cause Hearing to determine whether or not Waste Services Corporation was in compliance with a certain Condition of Approval contained in Special Review Permit #116, and WHEREAS, the alleged violations were said to be occurring on property described as part of the WI SW* and the SE; SW} of Section 32, Township 5 North, Range 66 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board, after hearing testimony from the Planning Department, finds that pursuant to the Standard in the Administrative Manual there is sufficient probable cause to schedule a Show Cause Hearing to consider whether or not the Special Review Permit issued to Waste Management Corporation should be revoked for failure to comply with a certain Condition of Approval, and WHEREAS, the Board shall hear evidence and testimony from all interested parties at said Show Cause Hearing. NOW, THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County. Colorado, that a Show Cause Hearing be scheduled to determine whether or not the Special Review Permit issued to Waste Services Corporation, should be revoked. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that the issue to be considered by the Board at said Show Cause Hearing is whether or not the permit holder is in compliance with the following Condition of Approval: Condition of Approval #1 states: That any sanitary landfill facility to be installed shall be approved by the State Health Department. 930288 931061 ed : r/L, P2, W4S/eServ, ArrNY, fh9'c/� • • SET SHOW CAUSE - WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION PAGE 2 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that the date for the Show Cause Hearing shall be October 13. 1993, at or about 10:00 a.m., and the hearing shall be held in the First Floor Hearing Room of the Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 5th day of April, A.D., 1993. ATTEST: t!1/i/ raid /&LWa4 Weld County Clerk to the Board BY: APPROVED AS FORM: gat County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD, COUNTY, COLORADO -s 2a, wed• ,‘X - Constance L. Hacert/ Chairman W. H� Webste Pro-Tem %Georg E. Baxt r arbara J. Kirkme er 930288 931061 DEPARTMENT OF STATE 1560 Broadway - Suite 200 Denver, Colorado 80202 • • NATALIE MEYER Secretary of State Administration 894-2200 Corporations 894.2251 Uniform Commercial Code 894-22® Elections 894.2680 Licensing & Enforcement 894-2680 TOO 894-2389 FAX 8942242 r -- April 1, 1993 George Baxter, Commissioner Office of Board of County Commissioners P.O. Box 758 Greeley, Colorado 80632 Re: Advisory opinion 93-3 per C.R.S. 24-18-101, et seq. Dear Mr. Baxter: C.R.S. 24-18-111 authorizes the Secretary of State to issue advisory opinions to persons subject to the provisions of C.R.S. 24-18-101, et seq. Please be advised that the opinion which is givers is advisory only. Also be advised that the response made will be part of a public file, however your name and address will be deleted to protect ynmr privacy. Your question is whether having attended a foort>a'l1 game before you were a Commissioner and sat in the box and participated in refreshments of a company who will be appearing before the Commission is a violation of the Code of Ethics. First of all, the statute does not address natters that happened prior to election. Therefore, at the time you attended the game you were not under the requirements of the Code of Ethics. Second, as you cited, C.R.S. 24-18- 104 (3) (f) specifically excludes tickets for sporting events fran the category of gifts of substantial economic value. Therefore, no conflict of interest occurred, no disclosure is required and recusing yourself fran the proceeding is not mandated. I trust the above answers your question. If you have further questions, please feel free to write for clarification. Natalie Secre..' of State Dept Is of part 4 Fax. ,35u,_Oaya ?I cll.' 9/ otZCO Fax n• (303) 0 694-2242 ' cxh,b,f xx 931061 ) Wilk. COLORADO March 25, 1993 The Honorable Natalie Meyer Secretary of State Department of State 1560 Broadway, Suite 200 Denver, CO 80202 OFFICE OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS r*: PMpNE (303) 3564000, EXT. 4200 FAX (303) 352-0242 P.O. BOX 758 GREELEY, COLORADO 80532 Board of County Commissioners of Weld County 915 Tenth Street Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Secretary and Board: Pursuant to C.R.S. SS 24-18-109(3)(b) and 24-18-110, this constitutes disclosure of an action which may have the appearance of impinging on my official duty and fiduciary trust. Currently pending before the Board of County Commissioners is the initial stage of a permit revocation process for a landfill operated by Waste Services Corporation, a subsidiary of Waste Management, Inc. This could be the first of a number of hearings which may result in the revocation or suspension of the permits to operate a landfill or which may in other ways affect the future course of operations of the landfill. I was elected to office in November of 1992 and took office on January 4, 1993. On November 3, 1992, following the election, I attended a Denver Broncos football game at the invitation of Brad Keirnes, the previous owner of Waste Services, Inc and watched the game from the Waste Management sky box. The value of the gift, which included tickets to the sporting event and food and soft drinks for myself and my wife, is not known, but I would estimate it to be less than $200 in value. I have reviewed the circumstances with Lee D. Morrison, Assistant Weld County Attorney, and he concurs with my view that this action does not breach any provisions of the Colorado Code of Ethics. Specifically, C.R.S. S 24-18-104(1) and (3) address the issue of gifts and provide that a gift constitutes a breach of fiduciary duty and public trust only where it is of substantial value or economic benefit which tends to improperly influence a public a 543 b1+ WV! 930948 The Honorable Natalie Meyer Board of County Commissioners of Weld County Page 2 March 24, 1993 official or rewards the official for an official act. Specifically excluded from the definition of a gift of substantial value are items of perishable or non -permanent value including meals or tickets to sporting events. C.R.S. S 24-18-104(3)(f). Furthermore, I was not a member of the Board of County Commissioners and could not have yet taken any official acts, and I do not believe that the invitation would improperly influence me to depart from a faithful and impartial discharge of my public duties. It is currently my intention not to recuse myself from any of the proceedings before the Board of County Commissioners involving Waste Services based upon this insubstantial gift. However, I would await receipt of any advisory opinion you are able to issue before making a final determination. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Yours truly, Gorge Baxter Weld County Commissioner GB/LDM/gb:meyer pc County Council Lee D. Morrison Due to the controversy surrounding the Greeley -Milliken landfill, owned and operated by Waste Services, Inc., the concerned citizens listed below call for a public hearing before the Weld County Board of Commissioners. Issues regarding ground and -surface water contamination, special wastes, alleged hazardous and toxic materials disposal, permits for discharges into the Big Thompson and Plane Rivers and future plans for the site need to be fully and honestly addressed. As concerned citizens it is our right to know the true extent of the contamination of our surrounding environment. It is our obligation to protect resources for ourselves and for future generations. We ask that a public hearing be scheduled as soon as possible so that the dissemination of critical information regarding the closure and restoration of this facility be accelerated. Name address If you would like notification, list phone number r�« \C (4 —c . _ en(-r/E AA" tut e 3Sz-�� "' 4- ,n��p,.� 3,52-3779 ' r n 1-j7 an,„ m 7073 24.6 A/c. ?s6-00795 S1 er" // «Y 3 ? -7' ?(c, a/ -..2O / 353-7.'18" 401/-1-5D1 -e'6)1O3 Ag'CP 3S2 -6(b3\ �.: ./,="77312 L �,s V 6 (6 7.1. /N' Au APT d 7/ Z 6/ C4/C(Pni a ;S A wa-A 6,- I s1.`' f ek,- It r1� W: I >v bta(0 z2c" Ask (i /Q / CIS%.�1 _/1L 11n'-4, Y 1. „ 1Gys i- . S v A. '4' SG —0i.), 3sar• zi2c-OeFirl 43st -7i \ i - 3 / 67 U ;$4,4,,F1A iitrce kf 2737 2t -, ±4 s -f- L,, 1 fr j(` ≥4 i /G-73 ?s ,>r-- r„C.EP C%) J$ - u) 3 j57 -c r`/' 931061 Due to the controversy surrounding the Greeley -Milliken landfill, owned and operated by Waste Services, Inc., the concerned citizens listed below call for a public hearing before the Weld County Board of Commissioners. Issues regarding ground and -surface water contamination, special wastes, alleged hazardous and toxic materials disposal, permits for discharges into the Big Thompson and Platte Rivers and future plans for the site need to be fully and honestly addressed. As concerned citizens it is our right to know the true extent of the contamination of our surrounding environment. It is our obligation to protect resources for ourselves and for future generations. We ask that a public hearing be scheduled as soon as possible so that the dissemination of critical information regarding the closure and restoration of this facility be accelerated. Name address If you would like notification, list phone number 1r AilAt A rn. teat- A J/14: tee G F4 `Inn ant ) 2 1 U // 9 4/ C o -rot_ (AAA 1,� �,'? ! 1/' r /0 / j W .,rt rat r1 in} �O C., r Irk C- J... `7,.0� 931061 • • Due to the controversy surrounding the Greeley -Milliken landfill, owned and operated by Waste Services, Inc., the concerned citizens listed below call for a public hearing before the Weld County Board of Commissioners. Issues regarding ground and -surface water contamination, special wastes, alleged hazardous and toxic materials disposal, permits for discharges into the Big Thompson and Platte Rivers and future plans for the site need to be fully and honestly addressed. As concerned citizens it is our right to know the true extent of the contamination of our surrounding environment. It is our obligation to protect resources for ourselves and for future generations. We ask that a public hearing be scheduled as soon as possible so that the dissemination of critical information regarding the closure and restoration of this facility be accelerated. Name address If you would like notification, list phone number . Z7ZS 177173r.: r- - x ,�n 14Y r?r J"Tr'�:c') 3-0557 y i d \ C'.OuRgoh3� .. ,S' 34 -4 -PG 5Q 931061 /J 4, 19413 Due to the controversy surrounding the Greeley -Milliken landfill, owned and operated by Waste Services, Inc., the concerned citizens listed below call for a public hearing before the Weid County Board of Commissioners. Issues regarding ground and -surface water contamination, special wastes. alleged hazardous and toxic materials disposal, permits for discharges into the Big Thompson and Platte Rivers and future plans for the site need to be fully and honestly addressed. As concerned citizens it is our right to know the true extent of the contamination of our surrounding environment. It is our obligation to protect resources for ourselves and for future generations. We ask that a public hearing be scheduled as soon as possible so that the dissemination of critical information regarding the closure and restoration of this facility be accelerated. Name address e.. 7 r_. Kid F! Mtir h.� Mueilgr' 71%q., If you would like notification, list phone number 3 2etL.. Z , Lf 3s"1-SV y Nl5-jr'St A*k C�vs�tty.+•ie(c� 353-&SO°j' f 931061 • Due to the controversy surrounding the Greeley -Milliken landfill, owned and operated by Waste Services, Inc., the concerned citizens listed below call for a public hearing before the Weld County Board of Commissioners. Issues regarding ground and -surface water contamination, special wastes, alleged hazardous and toxic materials disposal, permits for discharges into the Big Thompson and Platte Rivers and future plans for the site need to be fully and honestly addressed. As concerned citizens it is our right to know the true extent of the contamination of our surrounding environment. It is our obligation to protect resources for ourselves and for future generations. We ask that a public hearing be scheduled as soon as possible so that the dissemination of critical Information regarding the closure and restoration of this facility be accelerated. Name address sco3 £ L ("NoOcc 624 AI ,'.,u Ili "7 ac ct A -? CFI I 13 it_rj1- /h/fZ /ft jm'c- If you would like notification, list phone number R53 - ?s 3 73)13 ,Sct L% -t" 3SF 2 j : -3c /n - c 3y--4 3 ?c .� r . l 1!(17 •100'u -k Kd t. //o9-5aa--Ppoz-j ii0 7 2' (Lu ?eQ //o) felt <F '2L_ rf 00 36 15r ?(Act 4;i ',AAA 351-lal,Oc 3s/- L '7lp 35,3-9_Y,LS /70,7- roc/I ' -/9 Rcl .ill Vi 9 6/77( GAF Cf— co,rc / (w /i � 357 -4.133 931061 • • Due to the controversy surrounding the Greeley -Milliken landfill, owned and operated by Waste Services, Inc., the concerned citizens listed below call for a public hearing before the Weld County Board of Commissioners. issues regarding ground and -surface water contamination, special wastes, alleged hazardous and toxic materials disposal, permits for discharges into the Big Thompson and Platte Rivers and future plans for the site need to be fully and honestly addressed. As concerned citizens it is our right to know the true extent of the contamination of our surrounding environment. It is our obligation to protect resources for ourselves and for future generations. We ask that a public hearing be scheduled as soon as possible so that the dissemination of critical information regarding the closure and restoration of this facility be accelerated. Name address If you would like notification, list phone number e_e 41 6/445=3 t -c€4, ' Q Li5a1; rceX91 ?2&} 44st. l /099.3 t.1/4/ z- (frkww ICRcE7 WGt .61421 /121lliken yh 931061 • • Due to the controversy surrounding the Greeley -Milliken landfill, owned and operated by Waste Services, Inc., the concerned citizens listed below call for a public hearing before the Weld County Board of Commissioners. Issues regarding ground and -surface water contamination, special wastes, alleged hazardous and toxic materials disposal, permits for discharges into the Big Thompson and Platte Rivers and future plans for the site need to be fully and honestly addressed. As concerned citizens it Is our right to know the true extent of the contamination of our surrounding environment. It is our obligation to protect resources for ourselves and for future generations. We ask that a public hearing be scheduled as soon as possible so that the dissemination of critical information regarding the closure and restoration of this facility be accelerated. 79-7 Name address If you would like notification, list phone number ',1)`Sf e3 )c9eo c7StT& 3se-23av A'� ' i- -, :it'r7a7 6S`° - 7J,..7 St 35e- (5d/ / W , 33/o r - Id, at( 4.4.1-4_ I�R?.e-1Ap. 5. 7s' Xtarc Lea #tQh. 3J'0'-Gt%/ J. '1j- S 5÷. ,,z2 ietr 464. 1 -skyr +.n.:.� I., �; 4 dc 37°7 6; R 14-1) C —/lea yc 330-Crno ,237gl &e/r L7- 7114/ Z27- l4' I, 2 3" hi's /r/ /avl , (_/u 3=o- f rYL (6 ti- L./7 0—‘0_,,, cr,, fey �c=06jy .s.2 -7a3,4 931061 Due to the controversy surrounding the Greeley -Milliken landfill, owned and operated by Waste Services, Inc., the concerned citizens listed below call for a public hearing before the Weld County Board of Commissioners. Issues regarding ground and -surface water contamination, special wastes, alleged hazardous and toxic materials disposal, permits for discharges into the Big Thompson and Platte Rivers and future plans for the site need to be fully and honestly addressed. As concerned citizens it is our right to know the true extent of the contamination of our surrounding environment. It is our obligation to protect resources for ourselves and for future generations. We ask that a public hearing be scheduled as soon as possible so that the dissemination of critical information regarding the closure and restoration of this facility be accelerated. Name C ci rl address `riG,G I'arl If you would like notification, list phone number Q (-,D. q06 �'E.1. vbttr at\i.u_.4 33 I- &s ,o R 3.01 E- /551/2,4 o 2a e 35/-d "s7 r'(d /i/ t 94C47 931061 • • L Due to the controversy surrounding the Greeley -Milliken landfill, owned and operated by Waste Services, Inc., the concerned citizens listed below call for a public hearing before the Weld County Board of Commissioners. Issues regarding ground and -surface water contamination, special wastes, alleged hazardous and toxic materials disposal, permits for discharges into the Big Thompson and Platte Rivers and future plans tor the -site -need to be fully and honestly addressed. As concerned citizens it is our right to know the true extent of the contamination of our surrounding environment. It is our obligation to protect resources for ourselves and for future generations. We ask that a public hearing be scheduled as soon as possible so that the dissemination of critical information regarding the closure and restoration of this facility be accelerated. Name L t Jaux �7�Q L e v'3t Ord address 1219307 2, pJ 7 7 o-3 li* LA I L'% /W1 . &sett j. /; Y 3 1 19 3? a94 -In Atre 6-1,29-b �v,(tip(; 1 5y Vu-A3).-4&DGv-, Loom, Qr, If you would like notification, list phone number / 644' 6-7.4.41 /.o ‘` 5`i 3112•E- 4- / - oE, SI N OVA 0 c 3 r is ? iztt A e.. "55! - �vt- CE r)41:16k to . VA'tce\ ✓ 4-o 3 q iO / /Lk I-) 0 I / /PILL/ -C /L.-sp.-Ay c2 fr26 SC Tiro IZi 5 f L*`' 5i --C ,'rcC Y Cc cccc ?/ 34z-S76,Q ¢'w-�""3 (ti frGZ �I f Tv, o I Co. S( 3l 3.53' 11cic 4QGL 1CU 4 - riwi CLWtOY- L iorto r ;7 o ,1i 5s' St G -T -c -Pt -e 04634 ¶$cx0 l{ rr.-.r]Yt°(L i''-(l)t\I%JL4RLA7Li. Et fa 6)1•__V iii Q4( COt.LA. Co a oh -f 1,209 2 6 l° A yr T.Of s/ 3564376 ,37i)— zlc4, 154 N Sz1-2t2 2_ 931061 Due to the controversy surrounding the Greeley -Milliken landfill, owned and operated by Waste Services, Inc., the concerned citizens listed below call for a public hearing before the Weld County Board of Commissioners. Issues regarding ground and -surface water contamination, special wastes, alleged hazardous and toxic materials disposal, permits for discharges into the Big Thompson and Platte Rivers and future plans for the —site —need to be fully and honestly addressed. As concerned citizens it is our right to know the true extent of the contamination of • our surrounding environment. It is our obligation to protect resources for ourselves and for future generations. We ask that a public hearing be scheduled as soon as possible so that the dissemination of critical information regarding the closure and restoration of this facility be accelerated. Name address If you would like notification, list phone number fl 3s-g1U /J'tn6N 35.)-,Sso 244G 14.- a_O37 j'kt 'Are (p-re4 i C t"4 ' ISA: b /ce. Z S GG� �l Fly �go _ jam Cc/ SI<, - /„ln r zo n., C�rs.c/((At , /' 706 ( ?('I -3�, 51 l i0., f''C rtnA Y . a2,2e IC� f �' Jr_� 3 I - ^J� 11I C tCzeerriLec - Pry l 98mr-fig9 �'cG 3J —t /yob", ' ,yt G'tlatey 16 Y1/1 3f 4' 9 ` � ��, .zt -f/ 'L5 -K" 7r5'r 3q WI/Calk!' !�� 4 /C6 6m 3 3 / i/4/.lz/ ».,tni*'a v1\v,r\-tnc Co ( t& 7G- 9 1(r In_ WI • (-irze LLn CCU 5� 3 (5rttinei C Mutk cfsK%& • tuiq £j' ftV6 Gfee9 Coto ;?(";l 557 -4535 �0 A r 931061 Due to the controversy surrounding the Greeley -Milliken landfill, owned and operated by Waste Services, Inc., the concerned citizens listed below call for a public hearing before the Weld County Board of Commissioners. Issues regarding ground and -surface water contamination, special wastes, alleged hazardous and toxic materials disposal, permits for discharges into the Big Thompson and Platte Rivers and future plans for the site need to be fully and honestly addressed. As concerned citizens it is our right to know the true extent of the contamination of our surrounding environment. It is our obligation to protect resources for ourselves and for future generations. We ask that a public hearing be scheduled as soon as possible so that the dissemination of critical information regarding the closure and restoration of this facility be accelerated. Name address If you would like notification, list phone number U 4 I1,S.rrT tcvn L;ree Ieu, LC SCE? 1- [ c -/ , rze Ciae\l - rs S\05 �7 � ` D rN C'imc N A11enfW(4 oTI+ V' 4C1� h7ACCr&LI eRre /.h✓r F' ' [a /y ^''Q y -, . .^ /C/ t Cr '/ ()OCAAcS?Cffri 71" 14:...x. 1 F've /!:!"/1.27/ r !_ r 3cl-v�loN 3Z� sr --a. ar" s� "/,-.roYZs' 75,,- Z31"r'tr•- ?Cl J cotts hibSCn 1,1? 1 (1r r t Fin 1'! P� 5cck e .o-uoy\ nu-,NA("IC,),-;f 'iD it TecIZ 15rwr/!yQv; I:?, Cini,4'6'+rd Pl. &redo, CS1 g(1/ .j t t414 ly sSOO 101\ k i -7/71/ //P 07 4,e(//:,;,, (Lc' ?i-'-..3/ �..,.. t /A. �/l ry ) 5 t..t.7 k r''G A_C. /1eE.r-Uico. 9,cz s( Coo_ \\`c/ti-c c,ee\e" so 41.06; 'JL I r„yi%c � de /f31 leZ i i r' Aue tic/ 133 i„ ,.Pc 20j4 rote, itizt "'Ave oio36 irk, Ave 3S6- r l' ' C - Ore y Ca rrrc-g t Ll,il ?1, laS 414.k1-` A, _ (n7., -2-- 1 X 11 .Wgition 671/7 I I !, /A eis I -1 O II�(I 6 L I PP M Yi 1J__�_5 dpe / ;il`.alc. L Ul I ,4_ ( tee it t k Cr ?ICI //Lt 9 e It\-- (replevy (U 5.06 ?/ �7 _ 3 G 3! 39G -7z 3,2- -25-A3 931061 Due to the controversy surrounding the Greeley -Milliken landfill, owned and operated by Waste Services, Inc., the concerned citizens listed below Call for a public hearing before the Weld County Board of Commissioners. Issues regarding ground and -surface water contamination, special wastes, alleged hazardous and toxic materials disposal, permits for discharges into the Big Thompson and Platte Rivers and future plans for the site need to be fully and honestly addressed. As concerned citizens it is our right to know the true extent of the contamination of our surrounding environment. It is our obligation to protect resources for ourselves and for future generations. We ask that a public hearing be scheduled as soon as possible so that the dissemination of critical information regarding the closure and restoration of this facility be accelerated. Name address If you would like notification, list phone number ZQ2/.& ('7i ?'%t tree/e, Co �QU/ .2'985-$ r•-'4, .,,CW d 333t /-3' 13+J 5-1-. #-3I CSreC( C5 5- 31 ,35 .3 - tj7`"j% ,5c�,)M$4� 1/2,\2;,. ^ M , �Fiv D,c, 1er,Dei! v.K �'b:≥n �J-71 :3 - 304,0P27kf�. 1-1.-e;24,72. Ay.--, uyly/...a.. ErlRtd2-> 117 inX0170i C1tt`lje.. hoe'rfacnmn 2340 G -1h vc ,G?ce'e.l /: , A 3 I /3(7 1y (lLJJ J1Q,,4, Cr) Sion/ 5'o 3-7*"Av. Cf C ca-Ct,.d '�l)(C 3y. 1111 PaloJQrrlt Qr. Lavelr,nd ?as? 0 e4lAn z nhrmcn el2LeMyy.��r5- Karen Sr :i-k es' 'IAA; LC v k •- £omfta.! So,C/A- C P(I r /41/A L RC L D ERic /1- 14 i retr"k �icl✓C,1d e Ia,ncus'PK 1-72`1 lc4t.< n' {. t S -t.)(, ("^. 1'II'� tnlllo!,�l ).(11- 19t. t4vC. Ge GEyL Fob?' 353-v/6), R\C "s\ F sty F6 7 - cZa C ciR 351 15 i j42 -07g7 1-13 3 -1r" IL \,C c pCC.U'_`( .26/e VI <c17. fTn t/i,, `7 (7t 5 Cc 3S'2— "it --7- 2/71/ :CANN WRIVR. o9,u A-1"eve Ct�t 11A_ Gteclef v_c, r 7,A ,c75-:- 4f3rsit A S'n C '� X3 > PP 7 9 0- L cnin _ 3 / ` rM 9C _ flY1\,cA C11&1n I_PL/0 in At, 0_ G,fo ,l,orjC'n..,-1 3-Li�.-3 .\\1\.A\-tVS3 w/lti //X? / 1,'(]'/;C /� r'. /l L/ /0 '_.jV! ,f1"r; Ii 7(, 1li•CV' - �r: i.O All; Qck,c, ) L2W i ITh4u0-1 0ra�f¢y CO VO✓p31 5s-23&? nA / 7 4-)10i4ne, 1AS ?`i7 )2 4J(i2s - 7/,Ail , /L,. It / r^ eVi5)-ri ) 517-.2.2G",7 ?30-Y,aci L/ct ), l�hllt rs+64 -1)", &Vein, m<F;rk&.. y4J4V �) .9 b/d 21V//L U4 lQu,easit ry\ �l«`k cc t'zw /421,4 7C2111; _Pity,: Rue to the controversy surrounding the Greeley -Milliken landfill, owned and operated by Waste Services, Inc., the concerned citizens listed below call for a public hearing before the Weld County Board of Commissioners. Issues regarding ground and -surface water contamination, special wastes, alleged hazardous and toxic materials disposal, permits for discharges into the Big Thompson and Platte Rivers and future plans for the —site --need to be fully and honestly addressed. As concerned citizens it is our right to know the true extent of the contamination of our surrounding environment. It is our obligation to protect resources for ourselves and for future generations. We ask that a public hearing be scheduled as soon as possible so that the dissemination of critical information regarding the closure and restoration of th'^s facility be accelerated. If you would like notification, list address phone number Name 1Ap .5' ?To C. / 71' Sr LNC Y./ c.,1 y (A1,y i" - sk L,r,4c ' .�, t- Iv.'eh /c/n- ff At f',0 Ut l f /L, L7 y C% %i A '7 3 C�,Ct7.24ig i (e%G//;.rpp Le. 71/r ;ham -/l41 1101 I Sell 2,C11-1 ((" r r 1 e.� - L,..wf..i.... c }- '761- 7700 a �( 9'MS(/ 7s3 /457 C � A >St - ()z/ 0)ctlall2 1'mrl'i`2o3 4 351-`kl ci•C 11. u l\0STo w C E* A v /o6 .f ie/./Q JK4 A- 7 A 37 - C/Cer 9Sy— S/2 l 70 �? . t 3 S 3 ' % 3 ‘,� 931061 • Due to the controversy surrounding the Greeley -Milliken landfill, owned and operated by Waste Services, Inc., the concerned citizens listed below call for a public hearing before the Weld County Board of Commissioners. Issues regarding ground and -surface water contamination, special wastes, alleged hazardous and toxic materials disposal, permits for discharges into the Big Thompson and Platte Rivers and future plans for the -site -need to be fully and honestly addressed. As concerned citizens it is our right to know the true extent of the contamination of our surrounding environment. It is our obligation to protect resources for ourselves and for future generations. We ask that a public hearing be scheduled as soon as possible so that the dissemination of critical information regarding the closure and restoration of this facility be accelerated. If you would like notification, list Name address phone number l 707 rr/1/n F( ,C hC a.4, IQr it* �A,tr&4 ft!/fp ail n3131 / c6�., �r��/Vic 3036 Shin ,4t P> 7,,2c I/V f/nk(n3 *ill Z - 7 ro I - s±)- }3>'S ,.7-4073 L7ocj 7riztur //vs-ern/20 ! 2/a (3sz 6S'/2 wico6vytti:act An14 444ft Poe Or Ira Viso, tricot Atzsr-EN VOA,' r1�9 p i{A, uo rZ 2122 Ytt /WE LV/1 2-4wycilFt n 714- t -L L 7-DtA q fir n ft-. J5S 1 -car 7d 931061 • • Due to the controversy surrounding the Greeley -Milliken landfill, owned and operated by Waste Services, Inc., the concerned citizens listed below call for a public hearing before the Weld County Board of Commissioners. Issues regarding ground and -surface water contamination, special wastes, alleged hazardous and toxic materials disposal, permits for discharges into the Big Thompson and Platte Rivers and future plans for the site need to be fully and honestly addressed. As concerned citizens it is our right to know the true extent of the contamination of our surrounding environment. It is our obligation to protect resources for ourselves and for future generations. We ask that a public hearing be scheduled as soon as possible so that the dissemination of critical information regarding the closure and restoration of this facility be accelerated. Name address If you would like notification, list phone number 5/3d44/43 cgowE/g: A41 cRisO/✓ 11,O71 WAY iY ✓aaaier 11114 tktiJem 9/4J 6ire%y. a. 5.003/ - 3261.. f c _CO EOb31 - 4713- A ins ra."a I- Cued ey Cb AD(Q3 f-3841 1.l -363-0805- per te,ir r ;tic✓ r I( 1aapl,.r Refit CL' (r10 (/-- 14+1 h cXu,n i3( frK-e )ZA__r 1-?q, a/ir-0 r r t acL Yl . r#aY_Cize_r_t 1'C1�116d� R&<<) SIic�I1tll Arno. Irt -4"i ?;.()&3 I t4 1 0 Mr,h e vri(t U RV(); / 9 05 T[ 1 Lv- rz +taco u/CO &ice 1 3c -11O9 c4 LL2 L/ 112c Co k1/42 « // 351— 113 (,UC.i b 31, I - 3-7 1 IOCG Ca..are 7 U); i i v Rap -s1 c 1- 304 5c.2 I Qi� 6ahkk0,2 ` G1037 351- 366 (OD ttia- Gm,- , 9O631 3C)„,- 61,63 3?,o IL: v5.0.Hot II 6'Y c L t_PRj (6 n ) 3r Kibe4/27 X - j, o e06su 4 gni', L-ffn0.Hatic1, (o dig,<,a 1C( 7_11,4" !fire& hvc4c<• ( CD & 3 ' -70 21 ` C7�/' 4, Y,0 ice{ (oo c2 an h A4" JGU//4 s/ (O '&063/ 57- 1;.k2 16,9- ) 7 g. -- 'ca- Co 8& j757 931061 Due to the controversy surrounding the Greeley -Milliken landfill, owned and operated by Waste Services, Inc., the concerned citizens listed below call for a public hearing before the Weld County Board of Commissioners. issues regarding ground and -surface water contamination, special wastes. alleged hazardous and toxic materials disposal, permits for discharges into the Big Thompson and ,Platte Rivers and future plans for the -site -need to be fully and honestly addressed. As concerned citizens it is our right to know the true extent of the contamination of .our surrounding environment. It is our obligation to protect resources for ourselves and for future generations. We ask that a publi _t gering_be_scheduled as soon as possible so__th..at the dissemination _of critical information regarding third-esure_ and restoration of this facility be accelerated. Name address Peso._£.KI /�AiINTI.t�L • eh' ,L /3l v.P fL, /aaM 's - (114A 4w 1t ,SurrAAn Pmitka it Cy<1vc1..f, -2, -� 271tint/ _ it /Ail \, l I )Dcfwr V Cv zi {7,AiCCtdi 206 (.4)J4nh (''0(1L C., l9go X14, b e1'U C Ely '-* 6? 5/ - Z '75? z 3 "5t If you would like notification, list phone number 3SI—ES G?z� w;F\uKwv\ ^eeHH'j (071 g06 /- SSE? Lyor,tv, C„ooSa5 Co sib I 351-y1 1061 GrC.&in(-turd ?\•tt ori(-2vet ,CQCab31 s53 3 1476 / (( 3:7 - �3?(o 3c 1 e-;& C-irrCl` 4Ciy Cj1'j (I -r" (-3! ze-44 3 CO CS -1 _L11 X\ 35.3 z 26O P tu, t/, 35/ -4/73 CYEFl C G 35 1 -306 (nVPiy/ c -O -Zs/ �s- 953) 1 &rct tv,L,P 377, 3X537 >92- i'1%VoCc u r 4.1 35o 9 7,3"1/41 c1'LUJ to QCCn31 -'�(e 35I . 5Scc 1 // ni2z//.efactu% /1'3 txrny:1-7//, /,a(t ( 7r'cif e1 fon SE L -._,1n-- 2 a G 2 7 (ftfc/Ginzni. C h (11 4 o tevv9. A-- - ,Se -Y 7 25'9 3 c.r; sc. Pie+co I fi 17 17YE?' Ave . ley.. co eo(r3 j 350- o092 rot, ot, ler 5ye; Wait 3o7 / Co ,76%, 3/ 311- 3297 931061 IDue to the controversy surrounding the Greeley -Milliken landfill, owned and operated by Waste Services, Inc., the concerned citizens listed below call for a public hearing before the Weld County Board of Commissioners. issues regarding ground and -surface water contamination, special wastes. alleged hazardous and toxic materials disposal, permits for discharges into the Big Thompson and Platte Rivers and future plans for the site need to be fully and honestly addressed. As concerned citizens it is our right to know the true extent of the contamination of our surrounding environment. It is our obligation to protect resources for ourselves and tor future generations. We ask that a public hearing be scheduled as soon as possible so that the dissemination of critical information regarding the closure and restoration of this facility be accelerated. Name X11 G lyl 6 t,,Fr,,4 Gh(i3toAher 12 GacriY-e' 5A'4 Cam. address If you would like notification, list phone number r7 a. i'�, /Gdr ' G.P.IF/ CO (31 °r o C-0 loG3i r 3'IS7 / few HF/ / r.:. (a Yo(T/ ,3,54-39/6 icmWit 111s five #3a[ Crte.'..*'jCo410C31 ! c,i2 5,' ^/LJ.rhe /( @-0-O +i4 9 `"' 44,e arrr_eu�-"t� tergi 6N 6v6 Ci Slid/ '' 36 N rU (-06 3 7 S7 - yol. 3S A-034( r235LG'73a 1g/ -22-147 3s/ -43'- f 42u t! ' Auq Cr,nc l { r. f.4 51 35 3 cam( c( i2oq 99 (SA- 36v ��/Y CO FY031 3ScR y.39q 1 � �42- PT) Jilt G Zr ckei %( C d.YL C /rft JG�1%c' lik;if444- stia.4 /1/9 11%7-'Cr r_ 77417 r ck 5_i • • SF CaLah,,, 4pl.6). G* r� Soya, /867 lt+'/ Siv e 60 —Re 17 ea ea 1 i6111$ "rb-A Sr i zcd .753 -NYt2 - .2.j J5r-(,`tcge 5 44::7 ..?v.it r 12. `i n' A,.c r..;e3 ( 7'k +i�1N 35-3 75.5-6 5S 7?74- ./' 931061 Due to the controversy surrounding the Greeley -Milliken landfill, owned and operated by Waste Services. Inc., the concerned citizens listed below call for a public hearing before the Weld County Board of Commissioners. Issues regarding ground and -surface water contamination, special wastes, alleged hazardous and toxic materials disposal, permits for discharges into the Big Thompson and Platte Rivers and future plans for the site need to be fully and honestly addressed. As concerned citizens it is our right to know the true extent of the contamination of our surrounding environment. It is our obligation to protect resources for ourselves and for future generations. We ask that a public hearing be scheduled as soon as possible so that the dissemination of critical information regarding the closure and restoration of this facility be accelerated. Name /t address If you would like notification, list phone number 314/ - .5, Gfrr / Cyr z / c / 3c _32 7/_° /7"' S+ eice l,iY/r eV-C.L[ S3-gG -2f, 7/a )7t1,„,s4 h4GF.k'I bQ s,'?O(P.i7/ .3r -N- ..-/Asc) /y// c ' ,r1 L-, i ( , f /, (p YGi c -- -Z072\ Trig (4 GAr )e ('sockc._ 351-'z'6,Y7 Piz, i 3,l -4.311 J V ✓I E , N /7171 iccAnk Svti t S� C� V l% a&P v 1J C.r(vi ev1 arrt 1 ]AI I CAI<r; fit IL 6r (-e JAI 1 at(ti w"' e r,O63 4/ I fi.Si C1 6 11, ,4) 19A sf. j w ' 1 Co 5(4*In 4 -i L C lams, e Psy C'12 b, Co / 1 C-,) 6 / L 9-13' fl _ v eC4 X24, 15ov IZ,Tr, 4±1QAa �S)0 9 c(i '7 !i7(( i2 C � -C C7?c ci 2 fT k1 . ! n9 7,, % (,l02 7/7 X67-7,692, as -3- 1EoL, APO ,,C76)44 -?E 931061 Due to the controversy surrounding the Greeley -Milliken landfill, owned and operated by Waste Services. Inc., the concerned citizens listed below call for a public hearing betore the Weld County Board of Commissioners. Issues regarding ground and -surface water contamination, special wastes, alleged hazardous and toxic materials disposal, permits for discharges into the Big Thompson and Platte Rivers and future plans for the site need to be fully and honestly addressed. As concerned citizens it is our right to know the true extent of the contamination of our surrounding environment. It is our obligation to protect resources for ourselves and for future generations. We ask that a public hearing be scheduled as soon as possible so that the dissemination of critical information regarding the closure and restoration of this facility be accelerated. Name -ivec _ck aC. Vii., VAAC '1&j, I»-' Gz> address lAjj i9 (Sl a Liar h_A`ci cc( MS'S- ✓tnrc; Pif (iWlhihS, C_C >t L L- (- rae1eyt C s,"1 k.C , a If you would like notification, list phone number I W 726 /5°,r �i.:�� ck 506./ (C_a, _ rcr 1 Cr rcr<, 3/ 't14. 931061 kip Due to the controversy surrounding the Greeley -Milliken landfill, owned and operated by Waste Services, Inc., the concerned citizens listed below call for a public hearing before the Weld County Board of Commissioners. Issues regarding ground and -surface water contamination, special wastes. alleged hazardous and toxic materials disposal, permits for discharges into the Big Thompson and Platte Rivers and future plans for the site need to be fully and honestly addressed. As concerned citizens it is our right to know the true extent of the contamination of our surrounding environment. It is our obligation to protect resources for ourselves and tor future generations. We ask that a public hearing be scheduled as soon as possible so that the dissemination of critical information regarding the closure and restoration of this facility be accelerated. Name address /63;,)-- Mot•F' ttr 'rr n N o�c < t% P I aww sc., (cifi * £'7 RmAY'° l hc•A.IL! Q.& n r 1 44, rfretuz.. 4717 /?'r`` _A11 r 'RCS S sinJaldn R4 ),-& (J;Qhkiirf i- 2I, t.,_:( C Ac r C .f;s:, t e, _ lip �f t nrPf' / v £C1(c en 1Z'0S2Jc If you would like notification, list phone number 1?il/771b G,recle IMF Cree /266_3/ 931061 Due to the controversy surrounding the Greeley -Milliken landfill, owned and operated by Waste Services, Inc., the concerned citizens listed below call for a public hearing before the Weld County Board of Commissionefs. Issues regarding ground and -surface water contamination, special wastes, alleged hazardous and toxic materials disposal, permits for discharges Into the Big Thompson and Platte Rivers and future plans for the site need to be fully and honestly addressed. As concerned citizens it Is our right to . know the true extent of the contamination of our surrounding environment. It is our obligation to protect resources for ourselves and for future generatio^;s. We ask that a public hearing be scheduled as soon as possible so that the dissemination of critical information regarding the closure and restoration of this facility be accelerated. Name address If you would like notification, list phone number X11/ -Y7sJ 27/ —44,3 .3 /,fit elv —",//;/41. 44<m.r '�' 7 "�'✓,{1 i ..9i//AC, yv / Ala . !'ice ni .M9,10.4, /ni�l� l CP .2 . jff io4-3' 931061 Due to the controversy surrounding the Greeley -Milliken landfill, owned and operated by Waste Services. Inc., the concerned citizens listed below call for a public hearing before the Weld County Board of Commissioners. Issues regarding ground and -surface water contamination, special wastes. alleged hazardous and toxic materials disposal, permits for discharges into the Big Thompson and Platte Rivers and future plans for the site need to be fully and honestly addressed. As concerned citizens it is our right to know the true extent of the contamination of our surrounding environment. It is our obligation to protect resources for ourselves and for future generations. We ask that a public hearing be scheduled as soon as possible so that the dissemination of critical information regarding the closure an restoration of this facility be accelerated. Name address If you would like notification, list phone number ftt.i.a.Zo vi.42cJcA I.2 cif! - c(y s; I/ // /yr.1 57 r!/� � d ( z L33 21-4W 330 en( It; kawnir 0 (1\n...e.inn ,.\ ?l'nrue �lnrk 0F.pp� 4-N 4T yak, C1/,Antl �-L,"/{A'l 41,444-€ 11%1>6, , Pi dl 1 � l 1141h «Z (` /7/:-; / ` /L ,� 3 i `(/0WR ;kin 5 fl 7i4 4, 4/ ._7- girl '-Je 2 7virr,i // 35/- 3c/fa 11.0A ,('y . ) I .l ; , 5 HI' Lie a, - --7/2- t74 -,o F�' /Lc.., - v -3s .,..,— {s= PP 3:75 -72_63 120 &Th ANI - 4attkEf 391 S415) /6Z7 E, /fc 62.4Q4 j3-5 -sg3r 20& \ crher I1� 7 • 3? 6,2 #rL J-tedricrn l , ;Li 1 `gyp. 312 cC e r.T.t IQ i 1 3*Gi I z{ 3143 105 .S 21I‘-7- ?R1 AVk Eire elf - '3s U q W. J M St- e; -t1 CA. C - 3 - 'i7Y2 351 ?V:)1 -"nesn 9CLeinf 44'2/ 4..,'. >1 /r -n c,c/ C., $'0 at di es!- 237 rr: /7;.11, 6 Co ;Y/O ' g 4/C- o: y 3-- 931061 where the two rivers meet at Dos Rios. IN 1971, theleans dump had reached capacity* the Greeley -Milliken landfill was proposed. Local fanners agreed to siting of the dtnip because they were promised it would be only an INTERIM DUMP, AND WOULD CLOSE NOT LATER THAN 1986, when a new site would be in operation. TODAY, 21 YEARS LATER, the Greeley -Milliken dump is still in operation, GROWING LARGER EACH DAY! The landfill continues, and threatens to EXPAND, even though a large, lined and buffered facility in dry lands is located near Ault and another is planned near Ebensburg. The Greeley -Milliken landfill is UNRUVLAaW BY CURRENT 'STANDARDS. Be- cause it was established prior to the adoption of federal RCRA laws and prior to the adoption of current state regulation., the owners/operators have NEVER FILED AN ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS DESIGN PLAN. The landfill has not been REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH CURRENT SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL LAWS! When the landfill was begun, it was dug BELOW THE GROUNDWATER, was UNLINED, and TRASH WAS DUMPED INTO STANDING WATER, all in a major drainage area 1/2 mile from the Big Thompson River. REMEMBER, EVEN HOUSEHOLD WAStES SUCH AS PAINT CANS, SOLVENTS, CLEANERS AND GARDEN PESTICIDES CAN ENDANGER GROUND AND SURFACE WATER IF PLACID IN UNLINED DUMP'S! The Greeley -Milliken dump has holding ponds on site, which collect water. It also has deep, dangerous trenches to divert groundwater and surface run-off. - .. - - CONTAMINATION FROM HEAVY METALS is being detected in neighboring -irrigation -holding lakes. The headgates of these lakes are opened, the water leaves the lakes, goes into the irrigation ditches, finds its way through gravel beds and sloughs and INTO THE BIG THOMPSON AND THEN INTO THE SCUD -I PLATTE. IF THIS DUMP CONTINUES TO GO UNNOTICED, contamination of Colorado's surface aril ground water will result. The state Department of Health, through its Solid and Hazardous Waste Division and the Division of Water Quality MUST BE URGED TO INVESTIGATE THE SOURCE OF THIS CONTAMINATION! PUBLIC ATTENTION AND PUBLIC HEARINGS must focus on this facility so that it is closed and any resulting contamination is treated. Please join COLORADANS - CONCERNED OVER WATER (C -COW) in focusing atten- tion on this serious problem. Indicate your concern by signing your name and address below. This petition will be given to the Colorado Department of Health, DEMANDING THAT THE LANDFILL COMPLY WITH CURRENT FEDERAL NO STATE LAWS. Name I� YY\ r u /,1 ? aeci+ f'I FA :,n?(I4 flu) r.; �� 2 ft- wcGa rdrnr Gr�/%/ 671,02 i`' ✓M . lX�l/U CTiL(� c -'-t- , (1nc QS b +A 21 M.ddress / 4.7 . G 7 /, , w p P Aft. /o BOG x v 2(050- t-2:fkC w<t+li4co /R vg /R d IDc if'17. 4t. 64co foes :--1111« ‘-'/P6 LA / c/.- ^10 CT, r;-ze/i-Y x!;63/ 41:1Z-! la, 1'141 wcl 'r rt;na.f/r��xJJ a6 3 I 2iAlles ��' /"awc/A. oo!n3i 7"5 a. Ault aid another. planned near TOeenslurg. I - sew The Greeley Milliken landfill is UNREGULATED BY CURRENT STANDARDS. Be- cause it was established prior to the adoption of federal RCRA laws and prior to the adoption of current state regulations, the owners/operators have NEVER FILED AN ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS DESIGN PLAN. The landfill has not been REQUIREa TO COMPLY WITH CURRENT SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL LAWS! When the landfill was begun, it was dug BEUI4 THE G ouND ATER, was UNLINED, and TRASH WAS CUMP- INTO STANDING WATER, all in a major drainage area 1/2 mile from the Big Thompson River. REMEMBER, EVEN HOUSEHOLD S S"TES SUCH AS PXDC CANS, SOLVENTS, CLEANERS AND GARDEN PESTICIDES CAN ENDANGER GROUND AND SURFACE WATER IF PLACED IN UNLINED DUNS! The Greeley -Milliken dump has holding ponds on site, which collect water. It also has deep, dangerous trenches to divert groundwater and surface run-off. _ - _ _ CONTAMINATION FROM HEAVY METALS is being detected in neighboring irrigation -holding lakes. The headgates of these lakes are opened, the water leaves the lakes, goes into the irrigation ditches, finds its way through gravel beds and sloughs and INTO THE BIG THOMPSON AND THEN INTO THE scum PLATTE. IF THIS DUMP CONTINUES TO GO UNNOTICED, contamination of Colorado's surface and ground water will result. The state Department of Health, through its Solid and Hazardous Waste Division and the Division of Water Quality MUST RE URGED. TO INVESTIGATE THE SXiRCF. OF IRIS Crr. M' mflw! PUBLIC ATTENTION AND PUBLIC HEARINGS must focus on this facility so that it is closed and any resulting contamination is treated. Please join COLDRADANS - CONCERNED OVER WATIItR (C-l7W) in focusing atten- tion on this serious problem. Indicate your concern by signing your name and address below. This petition will be given to the Colorado Department of Health, DEMANDING THAT THE LANDFILL (=PLY WITH CURRENT FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS. Address . Cda(t mtl,c "79G the/4' kc no 32 2 11441 J/.Pink-br, 802 0 '(WO25.'u `we w (Gz,=1 Jr- off Ls� ,� •hold 2 gr.r) l � UDMCwA POGO' gg as .3 4 -fl wieiv, 75s (14)11 r STD, C (C4 e - Jb;aa> 9O3 C _So &Lei/ (0 f„ dk°2a2‘ 931061 :ail US ' fns LanO.rk:1 even though a large lined and buffered facility in , Ault and another ianned near xeensburg. The Greeley -Milliken landfill is UTEZE ?u'u) BY C - cause it was established prior to the adoption of foci _- to the adoption of current state regulation•:,, the o,to:- FILED AN ENGINEERING, AND OPERATIONS DESICI , :1.;:. The REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH CURRENT SOLID WASTE D...=. S . :I: was begun, it was dug BELOW THE GROGNDWATE2, vac L" INTO STANDING WATER, all in a major drainage ;:rea 1/2 Thomason River, REMEMBER, EVEN HOUSEHOLD rU-3flS ms Cis.. CCFANEPS AND GARDEN PESTICIDES CAN ENDANGEF CCCND AND :- IN UNLINED DUMPS! The Greeley -Milliken dung has holdir. :!c_ -;:s on si water. It also has deep, dangerous trenches to divert 'run-off. _ _ CONTAMINATION FFCM ,Y neighboring irrigation -holding lakes. The heocRatcs of opened, the water leaves the lakes, goes into the, irri its way through gravel beds and sloughs and I1470 11 1ST INTO THE SOUTH PLATTE. IF THIS DUMP oicyrnazz m GO L'::;' of Colorado's surface and ground water will result. Health, through its Solid and Hazardous Waste Division Water Quality MUST BE URGED TO INVESTIGATE 7a SOURCE CZ PUBLIC ATTENTION AND PUBLIC HEARINGS foris c:. it is closed and any resulting contamination in treated. Please join COLORADANS - CONCERNED o , WATER (C-:-.. tion on this serious problem. Indicate your concern b address below. This petition will be given :.a the Color -Health, DEMANDING THAT THE LANDFILL COMPLY WIT% ccni E 2 LAWS. Name r: aM La "s4 11 mo-d/Pi ceif l/2 6P4t-tt, '2c/A27/1 :ter" to EXPAND, is located near -- 'STANPARDS. Be- "_' laws and prior -_ato s have NEVER 11 :.as not been the landfill TP.AsH WAS D ZIPEA the Big GC:S, SOLVENTS, u�Z IF PLACID ^ich collect .:-,i2water and surface .=ring detected in' lakes are - catches,;, .:D THEN • contamination . ;;e Dcpa tlnent of the Division of ::S CONr.A•TION1 facility so that in focusing atten- .-.Lfl3 your name and "epart:;cnt of SAL AND STATE 4417 d4/9(-)5 I (Y/ LA ,yi-,v.,E- // . -3—Irter/ r- 'w\ 931061 HAVE A C -COW!! • CONCERNED!! GREEELEY-MSIKEN LANDFILL Coloradans - Concerned Over Water (C -COW) is a group of concerned Colorado citizens who demand action by their elected representatives to protect public health and the environment. The Greeley -Milliken landfill is located in a MAJOR DRAINAGE AREA, 1/2 mile from the Big Thompson River and 1 1/2 miles from the South Platte River where the two rivers meet at Dos Rios. IN 1971, the Evans dump had reached capacity and the Greeley -Milliken landfill was proposed. Local farmers agreed to siting of the dump because they were promised it would be only an INTERIM DUMP, AND WOULD CLOSE NOT LATER THAN 1986, when a new site would be in operation. TODAY, 21 YEARS LATER, the Greeley Milliken dump is still in operation, GROWING LARGER EACH DAY! The landfill continues, and threatens to EXPAND, even though a large, lined and buffered facility in dry lands is located near Ault and another is planned near Keensburg. The Greeley -Milliken landfill is UNREGULATED BY CURRENT STANDARDS. Be- cause it was established prior to the adoption of federal RCRA laws and prior to the adoption of current state regulations, the owners/operators have NEVER FILED AN ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS DESIGN PLAN. The landfill has not been REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH CURRENT SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL LAWS! When the landfill was begun, it was dug BELOW THE GROUNDWATER, was UNLINED, and TRASH WAS LUMPED INTO STANDING WATER, all in a major drainage area 1/2 mile frcn the Big Thompson River. REMEMBER, EVEN HOUSEHOLD WASTES SUCH AS PAINT CANS, SOLVENTS, CLEANERS AND GARDEN PESTICIDES CAN ENDANGER GROUND AND SURFACE WATER IF PLACED IN UNLINED DUMPS! The Greeley -Milliken dump has holding ponds on site, which collect water. It also has deep, dangerous trenches to divert groundwater and surface run-off. . . _ - - - CONTAMINATION FROM HEAVY METALS is being detected in neighboring irrigation -holding lakes. The headgates of these lakes are opened, the water leaves the lakes, goes into the irrigation ditches, finds its way through gravel beds and sloughs and INTO THE BIG THCMPSON AND THEN INTO THE SOUTH PLATTE. IF THIS DUMP CONTINUES TO GO UNNOTICED, contamination of Colorado's surface and ground water will result. The state Department of Health, through its Solid and Hazardous Waste Division and the Division of Water Quality MUST BE URGED TO DryLJiu.GATE TED 3C JRCE OF THIS CanruVe�"uviu�Giri PUBLIC ATTENTION AND PUBLIC HEARINGS must focus on this facility so that it is closed and any resulting contamination is treated. Please join COLORADANS - CONCERNED OVER WATER (C -COW) in focusing atten- tion on this serious problem. Indicate your concern by signing your name and address below. This petition will be given to the Colorado Department of Health, DEMANDING THAT THE LANDFILL COMPLY WITH CURRENT FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS. Address A I/ LOOP odatri, J/Qaf ic. b-�SO t ?Cfr) 0 bn.�drl nt G�)nhe/fI a O2/Z Zia r C 435 e SD B/ pats b 200-33 .39 x71✓ ,2i-- x �,�4 cex - 3820 S Atthican L' MLtera koolt 3c7 7. C s \�d3 6. fi\t 3* C4. caoa3 931061 HAVE A C-COW!!•BE CONCERNED!! GREEELEY-•LIKEN LANDFILL Coloradans - Concerned Over Water (C -COW) is a group of concerned Colorado citizens who demand action by their elected representatives to protect public health and the environment. The Greeley -Milliken landfill is located in a MAYOR DRAINAGE AREA, 1/2 mile from the Big Thompson River and 1 1/2 miles from the South Platte River where the two rivers meet at Dos Rios. IN 1971., the Evans dump had reached capacity and the Greeley -Milliken landfill was proposed. Icral farmers agreed to siting of the dump because they were promised it would be only an INTERIM LUMP, AND WOULD CASE NOT LATER THAN 1986, when a new site would'be in operation. TODAY, 21 YEARS LATER, the Greeley -Milliken dump is still in operation, GROWING LARGER EACH DAY! The landfill continues, and threatens to EXPAND, even though a large, lined and buffered facility in dry lands is located near Ault and another is planned near Keensburg. The Greeley -Milliken landfill is UNREGULATED ay CURRENT STANDARDS. Be- cause it was established prior to the adoption of federal RCRA laws and prior to the adoption of current state regulations, the owners/operators have NEVER FILED AN ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS DESIGN PLAN. Ihe landfill has not been REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH CURRENT SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL LAWS! When the landfill was begun, it was dug nELfXw TILL' GRO(NTY4ATER, was UNLINED, and TRASH WAS DUMPED INTO STANDING WATER, all in a major drainage area 1/2 mile from the Big Thompson River. REMEMBER, EVEN HOU5E10ID WASTES SUCH AS PAINT CANS, SOLVENTS, CLEANERS AND GARDEN PESTICIDES CAN ENDANGER GROUND AND SURFACE WATER IF PLACED IN UNLINED DUMPS! The Greeley -Milliken dump has holding ponds on site, which Collect water. It also has deep, dangerous trenches to divert groundwater and surface run-off. . - - - - _ CONTAMINATION FEa7M HEAVY METALS is being detected in neighboring irrigation -holding lakes. The headgates of these lakes are opened, the water leaves the lakes, goes into the irrigation ditches, finds its way through gravel beds and sloughs and INTO 'DE BIG THOMPSON AND THEN INTO THE SOUTH PLATTE. IF THIS LUMP CONTINUES TO GO UNNOTICED, contamination of Colorado's surface and yxound water will result. The state Department of Health, through its solid and Hazardous Waste Division and the Division of Wc.iter Quality muse BE URGED TO INVESTIGATE 'DIE SOURCE OF THIS ODITIMNATION1 PUBLIC ATTENTION AND PUBLIC HEARINGS must focus on this facility so that it .'s closed and any resulting contamination is treated. Please join CrIARADANS - CONCERNED OVER WATER (C -CM) in focusing atten- tion on this serious problem. Indicate your concern by signing your name and address below. This petition will be given to the Colorado Department of Health Dr24 NDIN)IG THAT THE LANDFILL COMPLY WITH CURRENT FEDERAL L AND STATE LA tip, c V14 -a;1",, (1(u- / • �' � i'�ii; l l Address 26 s sit 7,1 tic1 i i Swnua enn- ...Y , .2nj i Cv tt fSAS 5• TActs4li 't ckh--ex, l3 .802._‘ 0 al/ /WL(941 Ste- 4e,., 1. Po .& tit" - 931061 HAVE A C -COW! •BE CONCERNED!! GREELLEY-LIKEN LANDFILL Coloradans - Concerned Over Water (C -COW) is a gawp of concerned Colorado citizens who demand action by their elected representatives to protect public health and the environment. The Greeley -Milliken landfill is located in a MAJOR DRAINAGE AREA, 1/2 mile from the Big Thompson River and 1 1/2 miles from the South Platte River where the two rivers meet at Dos Rios. IN 1971, the Evans dump had reached capacity and the Greeley -Milliken landfill was proposed. jrnil farmers agreed to siting of the dump because they were promised it would be only an 1N ERTM DUMP, AND WOULD CLOSE NOT IAT 2 THAN 1986, when a new site would be in operation. TODAY, 21 YEARS LATER, the Greeley -Milliken dump is still in operation, QmWING LARGER EACH DAY! The landfill continues, and threatens to EXPAND, even though a large, lined and buffered facility in dry lands is located near Ault and another is planned near Keensburcl. The Greeley -Milliken landfill is UNREGULATED BY CURRENT STANDARDS. Be- cause it was established prior to the adoption of federal RCRA laws and prior to the adoption of current state regulations, the vmers/operators have NEVER FILED AN ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS DESIGN PLAN. The landfill has not been REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH CURRENT SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL LAWS! When the landfill was begun, it was dug BELOW THE GRWNDW.TER, was UNLINED, and TRASH WAS DUMPED INTO STANDING WATER, all in a major drainage area 1/2 mile fran the Big Thompson River. REMEMBER, EVEN HOUSEHOLD WASTES SUCH AS PAINT CANS, SOLVENTS, CLEANERS AND GARDEN PESTICIDES CAN ENDANGER GRCUND AND SURFACE WATER IF PLACED IN UNLINED DUMPS! The Greeley -Milliken dump has holding pords on site, which collect water. It also has deep, dangerous trenches to divert groundwater and surface run-off. — - _ — CONTAMINATION FRGM HEAVY METALS is being detected in neighboring irrigation -holding lakes. The headgates of these lakes are opened, the water leaves the lakes, goes into the irrigation ditches, finds its way through gravel beds and sloughs and INTO THE BIG THCMPSON AND THEN INTO THE SOUTH PLATTE. IF THIS DUMP CONTINUES TO GO UNNOTICED, contamination of Colorado's surface and ground water will result. The state Department of Health, through its Solid and Hazardous Waste Division and the Division of Water Quality MUST BE URGED TO INVESTIGATE THE SOURCE OF THIS CONTAM TION! PUBLIC ATE NTION AND PUBLIC HEARINGS must focus on this facility so that it is closed and any resulting contamination is treated. Pea join COLORADANS -- CONCERNED OVER WATER (C-CY%J) in focusing atten- tion on this serious problem. Indicate your concern by signing your name and address below. This petition will be given to the Colorado Department of Health, DEMANDING THAT THE LANDFILL COMPLY WITH CURRENT FEDERAL AND STATE TAWS. EmP r / ', m 2-7,7,/-4/;1/7„) ( n Address .�)s cP E 73? ;f c/ /S-179 4!.71-+n_tA-t,« A f",� et, a -O4. 5T /ter y !/c,./' -fie,/ //--7,/C:. 7316 17ThiLT. ( (L/ /A, F 2/ .�s/D . ,/ -2 7-c_. (.% . i ,e-leit , �. 80‘3/ 2.._zi c4 JI I.� .rti-d X63/ 931061 ■ feted facility iliiry lands is located near Ault and another 4liplanned near Keansburg. The Greeley -Milliken landfill is UNREGULATED BY CURRENT STANDARDS. Be- cause it was established prior to the adoption of federal RCRA laws and prior to the adoption of current state regulations, the amers/operators have NEVER FILED AN ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS DESIGN PLAN. The landfill has not been REQUIRES TO COMPLY WITH CURR NT SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL LAWS! When the landfill was begun, it was dug BMX THE GA7UNDWATEE2, was UNLINED, and TRASH WAS DUMPED INTO STANDING WATER, all in a major drainage area 1/2 mile from the Big Thomson River. REMEMBER, EVEN HOUSEHOLD WASTES SUCH AS PATNr CANS, SOLVENTS, CLEANERS ANp GARDEN PESTICIDES CAN ENDANGER GROUND AND SURFACE WATER IF PLACED IN UNLINED DUNS! The Greeley Milliken dump has holding ponds on site, which collect water. It also has deep, dangerous trenches to divert groundwater and surface run-off. . _ - ., CONTAMINATION FROM HEAVY METALS is being detected in neighboring irrigation -holding lakes. The headgates of these lakes are opened, the water leaves the lakes, goes into the irrigation ditches, finds its way through gravel beds and sloughs and INTO THE BIG THOMPSON AND THEN INTO THE SOUTH PLATTE. IF THIS DUMP CONTINUES TO GO UNNOTICED, contamination of Colorado's surface and ground water will result. The state Department of Health, through its Solid and Hazardous Waste Division and the Division of Water Quality MUST BE URGED TO INVESTIGATE THE SOURCE OF THIS CONTAMINATION! PUBLIC ATTENTION AND PUBLIC HEARINGS must focus on this facility so that it is closed and any resulting contamination is treated. Please join COLORADANS - CONCERNED OVER WATER (C -0014) in focusing atten- tion on this serious problem. Indicate your concern by signing your name and address below. This petition will be given to the Colorado Department of Health, DEMANDING THAT THE LANDFILL COMPLY WITH CURRENT FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS. tyrix 34-c-0(7- ott .C.fSM, 4A Fv4 IS JO Intad "v46'27 lc -I), Address zo 37 /4 6'-sA✓< car al23 2c -r WI !a1 Sf # 4 6 -re e l .Cc S4'3) „eLT r '� /-Q 64. . 'y�_l a I-064., I . 1W; lib 'i. fig (I/ CrcC 7. a:57/ 17, -+ Vitt S'a.>o7- 3150 L). 141W SR CREELtY /92C 284A/qv,- C) Ceeeley 3-5/ bfeA6i n75 Hai( gr Ce% y (0 31t kr, ' J-5reeleuCO. a, co. 0)12 Pu-ra/o) 931061 even though a larg fined and buffered facility in lands is lacauu new.Ault and another Japanned near Tceensburg. The Greeley -Milliken landfill is UNREMIATID BY CURRENT STANDARDS. Be- cause it was established prior to the adoption of federal RCRA laws and prior to the adoption of current state regulations, the owners/operators have NEVER FILED AN ENGINEERINGAND OPERATIONS DESIGN PLAN. The landfill has not been REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH CURRENT SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL LAWS! When the landfill was begun, it was dug BELOW THE GROUNWTER, was UNLINED, and TRASH WAS DUMPED INTO STANDING WATER, all in.a major drainage area 1/2 mile from the Big Thompson River. REMEMBER, EVEN HOUSEHOLD WASTES SUCH AS PAINT CANS, SOLVENTS, CLEANERS AND GARDEN PESTICIDES CAN ENDANGER GROUND AND SURFACE WATER IF PLACID IN UNLINED DUMPS! The Greeley -Milliken dump has holding ponds on site, which collect water. It also has deep, dangerous trenches to divert groundwater and surface 'run-off. .. _ _ CONTAMINATION FROM HEAVY METALS is being detected in neighboring irrigation -holding lakes. The headgates of these lakes are opened, the water leaves the lakes, goes into the irrigation ditches, finds its way through gravel beds and sloughs and INTO THE BIG THOMPSON AND THEN INTO THE SOUTH PLATTE. IF THIS DUMP CONTINUES TO GO UNNOTICED, contamination of Colorado's surface and ground water will result. The state Department of • Health,,through its Solid and Hazardous Waste Division and the Division of Water Quality MIST LE 1!RLE""D. TO INVESTIGATE THE SOURCE OF THIS CONTAMINATION! PUBLIC ATTENTION AND PUBLIC HEARINGS rust focus on this facility so that it is closed and any resulting contamination is treated. Please join COLORADANS - CONCERNED OVER WATER (C -COW) in focusing atten- tion on this serious problem. Indicate your concern by signing your name and address below. This petition will be given to the Colorado Department of Health, DEMANDING THAT THE LANDFILL COMPLY WITH CURRENT FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS. Namte 4 4cur-- `id/L Ram. Address c93c2S C+, keyt4«,c r(t. 037 MVO c7f. k'J 0 &$ l�fi1 cJ (c/4!c / 'hg Mi, 1cv t pnv cJ/i 4 n7 q 3 Sc/ (nJ (G Cc?0cc2 (C(19'( &o3u1 F'u Seco 9-49 4246\2 nthccti% �t-i - e5720u)dytm3 - atifibmec6t Ault and another ised near Xeennsburg. The Greeley -Milliken landfill is UNREGULATED BY CURRENT STANDARDS. Be- cause it was established prior to the adoption of federal RCFA laws and prior to the adoption of current state regulations, the owners/operators have NEVER FILED AN ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS DESIGN PLAN. The landfill has not been REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH CURRENT SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL LAWS! When the landfill was begun, it was dug BELOW THE GROUNDWATER, was UNLINED, and TRASH WAS DUMPED INTO STANDING WATER, all in a major drainage area 1/2 mile from the Big Thompson River. REMEMBER, EVEN HOUSEHOLD WASTES SUCH AS PAINT CANS, SOLVENTS, CLEANERS AND GARDEN PESTICIDES CAN ENDANGER G1mUND AND SURFACE WATER IF PLACID IN UNLINED DUMPS! The Greeley -Milliken dump has holding ponds on site, which collect water. It also has deep, dangerous trenches to divert groundwater and surface run-off. . - _ — CpN1:AmaarsON FROM HEAVY METALS is being detected in neighboring irrigation -holding lakes. The headgates of these lakes are opened, the water leaves the lakes, goes into the irrigation ditches, finds its way through gravel beds and sloughs and INTO THE BIG THOMPSON AND THEN INTO THE SOUTH PLATTE. IF THIS DUMP CONTINUES TO GO UNNOTICED, contamination of Colorado's surface and ground water will result. The state Department of Health, through its Solid and Hazardous Waste Division and the Division of Water Quality MUST BE URGED TO INVESTIGATE THE SOURCE or' Tn:S CONTAMINATION! PUBLIC ATTENTION AND PUBLIC HEARINGS must focus on this facility so that it is closed and any resulting contamination is treated. PIPasa join COLORADANS - CONCERNED OVER WATER (C -COW) in focusing atten- tion on this serious problem. Indicate your concern by signing your name aid address below. This petition will be given to the Colorado Department of Health, DEMANDING THAT THE LANDFILL COMPLY WITH CURRENT FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS. Name margro 7o/1 r/5 /5L /-377/ w'jf 491 ep,Po 6 3 / p463/ D.r Ii az ) S3( ‘9')7,60/1.1.7. Ti/ lw /0%4 ts . AO; , A0edv ,f , -��c�-I x%f =�?)?,,�,��', 24.1_, 931061 itial--, -- •• ,•_�+ and buffered facility in. lands is located near Ault and another = anned near Keansburg. The Greeley -Milliken landfill is UNREGU ACTED BY CURRENT STANDARDS. Be- cause it was established prior to the adoption of federal RCRA laws and prior to the adoption of current state regulations, the owners/operators have NEVER FILED AN ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS DESIGN PLAN. The landfill has not been REQUIRED TO OOMPLY WITH CURRENT SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL LAWS! When the landfill was begun, it was dug 8&CW THE GROUNDWATER, was UNLINED, and TRASH WAS DUMPED INTO STANDING WATER, all in'a major drainage area 1/2 mile from the Big Thonpson River. REMEMBER, EVEN HWSEHOLD WASTES SUCH AS PAINT CANS, SOLVENTS, CLEANERS AND GARDEN PESTICIDES CAN ENDANGER GROUND AND SURFACE WATER IF PTA= IN UNLINED UJWS! The Greeley -Milliken dui has holding ponds on site, which collect water. It also has deep, dangerous trenches to divert groundwater and surface ' run-off. _ — CONTAMINATION FROM HEAVY METALS is being detected in neighboring irrigation -holding lakes. The headgates of these lakes are opened, the water leaves the lakes, goes into the irrigation ditches, finds its way through gravel beds and sloughs and INTO THE BIG THCVIPSON AND THEN INTO THE SOUTH PLATTE. IF THIS WbW CONTINUES TO GO UNNOTICED, contamination of Colorado's surface and ground water will result. The state Department of Health,,through its Solid and Hazardous Waste Division and the Division of Water Quality MUST BE"URGED TO I'NVP$TTGATE THE SOURCE OF THIS CONTAMINATION! PUBLIC ATTENTION AND PUBLIC HEARINGS must focus on this facility so that it is closed and any resulting contamination is treated. Please join COIARADANS - CONCERNED OVER WATER (C -COW) in focusing atten- tion on this serious problem. Indicate your concern by signing your name and address below. This petition will be given to the Colorado Department of Health, DEMANDING THAT THE LANDFILL COMPLY WITH CURRENT FEDERAL AND STATE TAWS. Andress <<ur r4-4 _4), , gym, (I . ca !2PSnkkpCCf, Fti�;�yJif(e 1137 c` out 161/ O & /2i7 N ct'4,4 (rz3 J A0CI (W e Ze k 4 Sri./ 1r, a fa X73 w AY. L • L fl(r.•.(la t.,. Jaa7 daPal affr rc 9),C dcit -i.cmd 4.2.ccabw /4 o Q 6-t Cat / 2s -s- C -61140.•i/ < tO3Q a` 5 ?JUUA,r sa 935'1 (a.: IGc'C .wriNcsc` oaFi E720 tilt Ldoyv iOJtL • • • rvioA. gas Ae adD _SAMe4 8).30/ /26 ee&dote62 ,t L . th7cR # fa 57)3 93 3 0 Ci r_A a tvr°3 / _PatLafrin, X O 494,a,a4A-t"( i#0,71 /45LA,c, a atlas() , 440) /J/ CZ POD}C2 ccrc Ji /�Ij 1%_ r r c.42e (Cc Cali X -Z ,Q?/ l �r X20 -w. hi// , 16 CC;Pn )?-eacP a7,27 E 74 (v i'oo 2 cL. Sao 6 tom Kveary 6)0 APPL e..11‘na --_ lief is c W0302 ►ark ,y .alp 8-a ate./ even though a large, fined and buffered facility in lanls is located near Ault and another is�nnned near Keensburg. The Greeley -Milliken landfill is UNREGUTATED BY CURRENT STANDARDS. Be- cause it was established prior to the adoption of federal RCRA laws and prior to the adoption of current state regulations, the ownexs/operators have NEVER FILED AN ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS DESIGN PLAN. The landfill has not been =MED TO CMPLY WITh CURRENT SOLID WASTE DISPOSALLAWS! When the landfill was begun, it was dug BELOW THE GROUNDWATER, was UNLINED, and TRASH WAS DUMPED INTO STANDING WATER, all in a major drainage area 1/2 mile Fran the Big Thompson River. REMEMBER, EVEN HOUSEHOLD WASTES SUCH AS PAINT CANS, SOLVENTS, CLEANERS AND GARDEN PEs'I'IC.':DES CAN ENDANGER GECCND AND SURFACE WATER IF PLACED IN UNLINED DUMPS! The Greeley -Milliken dump has holding ponds on site, which collect water. It also has deep, dangerous trenches to divert groundwater and surface run-off: ._ - _ - CONTAMINATION FROM HEAVY METALS is being detected in neighboring irrigation -holding lakes. The headgates of these lakes are opened, the water leaves the lakes, goes into the irrigation ditches, finds its way through gravel beds and sloughs and INTO THE BIG THO1'PSON AND THEN INTO THE SOUTH PLATTE. IF THIS DUMP CONTINUES TO GO UNNOTICED, contamination of Colorado's surface and ground water will result. The state Department of Health, through its Solid and Hazardous Waste Division and the Division of Water Quality MUST BE URGED TO INVESTIGATE THE SCXJTCE"OF'TtIIS CONTAMINATION! PUBLIC ATTENTION AND PUBLIC HEARt4SS must focus on this facility so that it is closed and any resulting contamination is treated. Please join COLORADANS - CONCERNED OVER WATER (C -COW) in focusing atten- tion on this serious problem. Indicate your concern by signing your name and address below. This petition will be given to the Colorado Department of Health, DEMANDING THAT THE LANDFILL, COMPLY WITH CURRENT FEDERAL AND STATE YAWS. Namg 73f.4rruv.X", Address 9'n 431,; l sl y -/mid gii✓,(1O, 9.,/ re/s /5r /3r7/ 4-t4 GV Coto G 3 / e G3/ (r �z ► 2- S� AS n sc� o. 3l i79)7-e6rdefeI ,71y /abet, e' licei7gw r/19 to. 'YE",____ 931061 Ault and another planned near Yeensburg. The Greeley Milliken landfill is UNREGULATED BY CURRENT STANDAR S. Be- cause it was established prior to the adoption of federal RCRA laws and prior to the adoption of current state regulations, the owners/operators have NEVER FILED AN ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS DESIGN PLAN. The landfill has not been REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH CURRENT SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL LAWS! When the landfill was begun,, it was dug BELOW THE GROUNDWATER, was UNLINED, and TRASH WAS DUMPED INTO STANDING WATER, all in a major drainage area 1/2 mile from the Big Thompson River. REMEMBER, EVEN HOUSEHOLD WASTES SUCH AS PAINT CANS, SOLVENTS, CLEANERS AND GARDEN PESTICIDES CAN ENDANGER GROUND AND SURFACE WATER IF PLACED IN UNLINED DUMPS! The Greeley -Milliken dump has holding ponds on site, which collect water. It also has deep, dangerous trenches to divert groundwater and surface run-off. _ - - _ _ CONTAMINATION FROM HEAVY METALS is being detected in neighboring irrigation -holding lakes. The headgates of these lakes are opened, the water leaves the lakes, goes into the irrigation ditches, finds its way through gravel beds and sloughs and INTO THE BIG THOMIx.,ON AND THEN INTO THE SOUTH PLATTE. IF THIS DUMP CONTINUES TO GO UNNOTICED, contamination of Colorado's surface and groundwater will result. The state Department of Health, through its Solid and Hazardous Waste Division and the Division of Water Quality MUST BE URGED TO INVESTIGATE THE SOURCE OF THIS CONTAMINATION! PUBLSC ATTENTION AND PUBLIC HEARINGS must focus on this facility so that it is closed and any resulting contamination is treated. Please join COLORAD'NS - CONCERNED OVER WATER (C -COW) in focusing atten- tion on this serious problem. Indicate your concern by signing your name and address below. This petition will be given to the Colorado Department of Health, DEMANDING THAT THE LANDFILL COMPLY WITH CURRENT FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS. Name 1 ) Address S/V . c c -�7�n/. r ' vl uc2*" 4'L; e.Metr er . drat Th/$ LC /, c 5 • ale gl Dodlel. Qcye, so . k o SJ t �c ,�Yf'ce.2ri4c�c dc&t:G, 5 931061 even though a large, lined and buffered faciilit,:y ±n dry .his located near Ault and another "planned near Keensburg. s The Greeley -Milliken landfill is UNRD: Uu^u BY C,: T SDAND4RDS. Be- cause it was established prior to the adoption of federal 7lRA laws and prior to the adoption of current state regulation-., the c..'nern/c rators have NEVER FILED AN ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS DESIGN F:TN. ';he 1.: ::ill has not beets REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH CURRENT SOLID WASTE 'i MI\l, In;':. When the landfill was begun, it was dug BELOW THE GRCUNDwATER, .:,3 U: Lvc.:: -!,(1 TRASH wAS DUMPED INTO STANDING WATER, all in a major drainage_ :,rc. 1/2 r,.' :ram the Big Thompson River. REMEMBER, EVEN HOUSEHOLD ?C ;_ s zucH A5 CANS, SOLVENTS, CLEANERS AND GARDEN PESTICIDES CAN ENDANGER CRy .'D AND SC.YACE WATER IF PLACED IN UNLINED DUMPS! The Greeley Milliken dump has holding ponds on sit:, which collect water. It also has deep, dangerous trenches to divert r:.indwater and surface run-off. . _ _ CONTAMINATION FROM }::_;v: METALS is being detected in neighboring -irrigation -holding lakes. The hoadgates of t. ;e lakes are opened, the water leaves the lakes, goes in: the .lrrig. ditches, finds its way through gravel beds and sloughs and ::;TO TEE BIC ::: sou A:.ZD THEN INTO THE SOUTH PLATTE. IF THIS DUMP CO.NTIN o !A UN:- , contamination of Colorado's surface and ground water will rcg.rlt. T e .y.'Late Department of Health, through its Solid and Hazardous Wast: Division are. the Division of Water Quality MUST BE URGED TO INVESTIGATE acuPcs OF ::•::S CONTAMINATION! PUBLIC ATTENTION AND PUBLIC HEARINGS r...:st focus on '_.:is facility so that it is closed and any resulting contamination is treated. Please join COLORADANS - CONCERNED OV 2 ScCZ (C -C- : in focusing a tion on this serious problem. Indicate your concern by :1;ninq your name address below. This petition will be given '_o the color:. Department of _Health, DEMANDING THAT THE LANDFILL COMPLY ',CH CL REN: LDU AL AND STATE LAWS. Name L:_:�� elu- t{4M M 77 i 1Anryo z. ;FtsiW :J 5t. LEEUIC(,6 ca to'16 a-_(1/1,- rt. TAU., / , ;& O '/t /e797 2r 3-LihitC, c>r l7 ceo / 4'5l,5 1 !4 t't2./ 7 • /got 2E' "`S7` 6a.4 ' I 0Z.o 2 b 4- re ( /2'7 2# 4 17#/q fly, 167/ Thor.; w_u, ,c,..DQ 42i &j et. CD .3 (A). ? t `,.Ln'1-*0.1;1 X04 _e , ,._D $0 Sal 931061 even though a lar!ilmAined and buffered facility in larxis is located near Ault and another illikanned near Reensburg. The Greeley -Milliken landfill is tNR=LATFA BY CLIMEIT STANDARDS. Be- cause it was established prior to the adoption of federal RCRA laws and prior to the adoption of current state regulations, the awnexs/operators have NEVER FILED AN ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS DESIGN PLAN. The landfill has not been REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH CURRENT SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL LANS! When the landfill was begun, it was dug BELOW THE G ouND &'TER, was UNLINED, and TRASH WAS DUMPED INTO STANDING WATER, all in a major drainage area 1/2 mile from the Big Thomson River. RE14EWER, EVEN HOUSEHOLD WASTES SUCH AS PAINT CANS, SOLVENTS, CLEANERS AND GARDEN PESTICIDES CAN ENDANGER GROUND AND SURFACE WATER IF PLACED IN UNLINED DUMPS! The Greeley-Millikeni dump has holding ponds on site, which collect water. It also has deep, dangerous trenches to divert groundwater and surface run-off. . - _ - _ _ CONTAMINATION FROM HEAVY METALS is being detected in' neighboring in-igation-holding lakes. The headgates of these lakes are opened, the water leaves the lakes, goes into the irrigation ditches, finds its way through gravel beds and sloughs and INTO THE BIG THCEPSON AND THEN INTO THE SOUTH PLATTE. IF THIS DUMP CONTINUES TO GO UNNOTICED, contamination of Colorado's surface arid ground water will result. The state Department of Health, through its Solid and Hazardous Waste Division and the Division of Water Quality MUST BE URGED TO INVESTIGATE THE SOURCE OF THIS CONTAMINATICK! PUBLIC ATTENTION AND PUBLIC HEARINGS roast focus on this facility so that it is closed and any resulting contamination is treated. Please join COLORADANS - CONCERNED OVER WATER (C-CCW) in focusing atten- tion on this serious problem. Indicate your concern by signing your name and address below. This petition will be given to the Colorado Department of Health, DEMANDING THAT THE LANDFILL. oommy WITH CURRENT FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS. Name Address ,cr�lj,�9at1Mt IM .J y� J`pMJVU, Ccpkns Bed)/NA-tanRn y\n lc aran Y.aaj`orc`, e :P. qs1 13r`' si 4( la -/cci . Lc' 2062( T i ? S. /re,/ 1072 7- iss vs- .¢.-�. &.-. d �oc3y frA I lel" C-1rcefry rtd&o3( 34:221010 104 fc obi /o geS )r Ci fa c Lf5 �1SeyG.l r&, f7t Miff ( e9)(o..?( ti -\CYR -.Cl 4, (oBa Mil G1evPyV (44,e.1Ql` 931061 Midil Ault and another 'planned near Keansburg. " • The Greeley -Milliken landfill is UNREGULATED BY CURRENT•STANTARAS. Be- cause it was established prior to the adoption of federal RCRA laws and prior to the adoption of current state regulations, the owners/operators have NEVER FILED AN ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS DESIGN PLAN. The landfill has not been REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH CURRENT SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL LAWS! What the landfill was begun, it was dug BELOW THE GROUNDWATER, was i ••, and TRASH WAS DUMPED INTO STANDING WATER, all in a major drainage area 1/2 mile from the Big Thanpson River, REMEMBER, EVEN HOUSEHOLD WASTES SUCH AS PAINT CANS, SOLVENTS, CLEANERS AND GARDEN PESTICIDES CAN ENDANGER GROUND AND SURFACE WATER IF PLACED IN UNLINED DUMPS! The Greeley -Milliken dump has holding ponds on site, which collect water. It also has deep, dangerous trenches to divert groundwater and surface run-off. _ - _ coNTAMDNATION FROM HEAVY METALS is being detected in neighboring- irrigation -holding lakes. The headgates of these lakes are opened, the water leaves the lakes, goes into the irrigation ditches, finds its way through gravel beds and sloughs and INTO THE BIG THOMPSON AND THEN INTO THE SOUTH PLATTE. IF THIS LUMP NNTTN[JFS TO GO UNNOTICED, contamination of Colorado's surface and ground water will result. The state Department of Health, through its Solid and Hazardous Waste Division and the Division of Water Quality MUST BE URGED TO INVESTIGATE THE SOURCE OF THIS CONTAMINATION! PUBLIC ATTENTION AND PUBLIC HEARINGS mist focus on this facility so that it is closed and any resulting contamination is treated. Please join COLORADANS - CONCERNED OVER WATER (C-0OW) in focusing atten- tion on this serious problem. Indicate your concern by signing your name and address below. This petition will be given to the Colorado Department of Health, D,"24ANDING THAT THE LANDFILL OILY wI H CURRENT FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS. Address 27) Pill fl jr (do `,i 73Cpo,809/v REG Cf ivTrn. C:rr,nlo' 192c. < oAJ/t,D 4 C?rt f 2cc3/ C€Ea&(Co 093/ /822 7 f v { ,-r4Le !, 809/ • /77 7A -442r 6,4(1161 /42.1 bt`-• Apt -4L44 Arctic Ce ( 1tI 21 56(0 r,tdj, CO. ecQQ� 5 /G /7 -85E/Cy ,762; 931061 Ault and another Tanned near Keensburg. The Greeley -Milliken landfill is UNREGULATED BY CURRENT STANLIARD6. Be- cause it was established prior to the adoption of federal RCRA laws and prior to the adoption of current state regulations, the owners/operators have NEVER FILED AN ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS DESIGN PLAN. The landfill has not been REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH CURRENT SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL LANS! When the landfill was begun, it was dug BELOW THE GROUNDWATER, was UNLINED, and TRASH WAS DLL INTO STANDING WATER, all in a major drainage area 1/2 mile from the Big Thompson River. REMEMBER, EVEN HOUSEHOLD WASTES SUCH AS PAINT CANS, SOLVENTS, CLEANERS AND GARDEN PESTICIDES CAN ENDANGER GROUND AND SURFACE WATER IF PLACE) IN UNLINED DUMPS! • The Greeley -Milliken dump has holding ponds on site, which collect water. It also has deep, dangerous trenches to divert groundwater and surface run-off. . - - - OJhTAYaNATION FROM HEAVY METALS is being detected in neighboring -irrigation -holding lakes. The headgates of these lakes are opened, the water leaves the lakes, goes into the irrigation ditches, finds its way through gravel hnc7s and sloughs and INTO THE BIG THOMPSON AND THEN INTO THE SOUTH PLATTE. IF THIS DUMP CONTINUES TO GO UNNOTICED, contamination of Colorado's surface and ground water will result. The state Department of Health, through its Solid and Hazardous Waste Division and the Division of Water Quality MUST BE URGED TO INVESTIGATE THE SOURCE OF THIS CONTAMINATION! PUBLIC ATTENTION AND PUBLIC HEARINGS must foals on this facility so that it is closed and any resulting contamination is treated. Pleas join COLORADANS - CONCERNED OVER WATER (CHOW) in focusing atten- tion on this serious problem. Indicate your concern by signing your name and address below. This petition will be given to the Colorado Department of Health, DEmANDING THAT THE LANDFILL COMPLY WITH CURRENT FED R?L AND STATE LAWS. Name Address ti 'dip 4/ luau c k bija,nto 2ivt._ &M / e//azaA. ,1f c- &h ue (-)2Cdcy % S0b31 /rj°X /3 Out. lr> a-OG3 iovv4 l6Lt' em 702 Crala , (o 2-06-3/ SI�s.2^a'c“mxo (fre-c(-5 CO s(43) Si L EV i s R D, Ore -ley e -o 8°' 3) Qiv /A/ 0)6 " d ,Pe< 4.Pe / /co in A 7D- /o°^A✓< &( ri- 7?' ? % -f1'c '2,U HP^ c$ yeet Giippic 4 do X31 931961 Ault and another is.Snned near Heensburg. 7 The Greeley -Milliken landfill is UNREGULATED BY CURRENTDTANO7RIS. Be- cause it was established prior to the adoption of federal RCRA laws and prior to the adoption of current state regulations, the owners/operators have NEVER FILED AN ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS DESIGN PLAN. The landfill has not been REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH CURRENT SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL LAWS! When the landfill was begun, it was dug BELOW THE GPAUNL aTFR, was UNLINED, and TRASH ?ThS DUMPED flcO STANDING WATER, all in a major drainage area 1/2 mile from the Big Thompson River, REMEMBER, EVEN HCUSEIiOLD WASTES SUCH AS PAINT CANS, SOLVENTS, CLEANERS AND GARDEN PESTICIDES CAN ENDANGER GROUND AND SURFACE MATER IF PLACID IN UNLINED DUMPS! The Greeley -Milliken dump has holding ponds on site, which collect water. It also has deep, dangerous trenches to divert groundwater and surface run-off. . - - - CONTAMINATION FRAM HEAVY NETALS is being detected in neighboring -irrigation -holding lakes. The headgates of these lakes are opened, the water leaves the lakes, goes into the irrigation ditches, finds its way through gravel beds and sloughs and INTO THE BIG THOMPSON AND THEM INTO THE SOUTH PLATTE. IF THIS DUMP CONTINUES TO GO UNNOTICED, contamination of Colorado's surface and ground water will result. The state Department of Health, through its Solid and Hazardous Waste Division and the Division of Water Quality MUST BE URGED TO INVESTIGATE THE SOURCE OF THIS CONTAMINATION! PUBLIC ATTENTION AND PUBLIC HEARINGS must focus on this facility so that it is closed and any resulting contamination is treated. Please join COLORADANS - CONCERNED OVER WATER (C -COW) in focusing atten- tion on this serious problem. Indicate your concern by signing your name and address below. This petition will be given to the Colorado Department of Health, DEMANDING THAT THE LANDFILL COMPLY WITH CURRENT FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS. Name Addres@ ARlk CyL CYVALtitt Aug _9_ Li the.sr1 $L fY CIA) ► inn ✓hrr� Law r c. ` �Y ny 44/ /,t2uaa Co, 80/31 G: ,'� :'.�lcll�J-w,, .•:, C•=. ir- /,,;t.;, 333/6, L0CG �3�4i FeJ5ey, Ct ,S'O(o4: q//ha/jar? /' 7 A'r/e' ea. tazi /6,35 C k5Loe4 _A -L Jo/AZ.o ,Yoos /az d4-zyd4.f 6'44 co ht $/ wtict'' ,1,( LO �SD(�bl _ J l'-)l'n I i' t2(( (`voe(a(jCoOC(oa4 VA; 21 I�4-(7 6 Az -3) i),4 6 /?-n" .z) F l aucle .eels o acc37 ls?IIZ-n'J @4- z C�rff(Pl9CtX31 HAVE: A c -cowl I BE firCERNED11 GREEELEY-MILLIoN LANDFILL Coloradans - Concerned Over Water (C -COW) is a group of concerned Colorado citizens who demand action by their elected representatives to protect: public health and the environment. The Greeley -Milliken landfill is located in a MA7oR DRAIN GE AREA, 1/2 mile from the Big Thompson River and 1 1/2 miles from the South Platte River where the two rivers meet at Dos Rios. IN 1971, the Evans dump had reached capacity and the Greeley -Milliken landfill was proposed. Local farmers agreed to siting of the dump because they were premised it would be only an INTERIM DUMP, AND WOULD CLOSE NOT LATER THAN 1986, when a new site would be in operation. TODAY, 21 YEARS LATER, the Greeley -Milliken dump is still in operation, GROWING LARGER EACH DAY! The landfill continues, and threatens to EXPAND, even though a large, lined and buffered facility in dry lands is located near Ault and another is planned near Keensburg. The Greeley -Milliken landfill is UNRBXIJ. TED BY CURRENT' STANDARDS: Be- cause it was established prior to the adoption of federal RCRA laws and prior to the adoption of current state regulations, the owners/operators have NEVER FILED AN ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS DESIGN PLAN. The landfill has not been ?EXITED TO COMPLY WITH CURRENT SOLID WINE DISPOSAL LAWS! When the landfill was begun, it was dug BELOW THE GROUNDWATER, was UNLINED, and TRASH WAS DUMPED INTO STANDING WATER, all in a major drainage area 1/2 mile from the Big Thompson River: REMEMBER, EVEN HOUSEHOLD WASTES SUCH AS PAINT CANS, SOLVENTS, CLEANERS AND GARDEN PESTICIDES CAN ENDANGER GROUND AND SURFACE WATER IF PLACED IN UNLINED DUMPS! The Greeley -Milliken di.np has holding ponds on site, which collect water. It also has deep, dangerous trenches to divert groundwater and surface '.run-off. .. - -- _ CONTAMINATION FROM HEAVY METALS is being detected in neighboring irrigation -holding lakes. The headgates of these lakes are opened, the water leaves the lakes, goes into the irrigation ditches, finds its way through gravel beds and sloughs and INTO THE BIG THOMPSON AND THEN INTO THE SOUTH PLATTE. IF THIS DUMP CONTINUES TO GO UNNOTICED, contamination of Colorado's surface and ground water will result. The state Department of Health, through its Solid and Hazardous Waste Division and the Division of Water Quality MUST BE URGED TO mVF.STIGATE THE SOCK OF THIS CCRNTNCWCIONI PUBLIC ATTENTION AND PUBLIC REARINGS must focus on this facility so that it is closed and any resulting contamination is treated. • Please join COLORADANS - CONCERNED OVER WATTS (C -CM) in focusing atten- tion on this serious problem. Indicate your concern by signing your name and address below. This petition will be given to the Colorado Department of Health, DEMANDING THAT THE LANDFILL COMPLY WITH CURRENT FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS.Emig Address c� 7 -.�� ether 3.t3,, &roz37 si1061 even. though a large fined and buffered facility in lands is located near Ault and another is. anned near Keensburg. The Greeley -Milliken landfill is UNREGULATED BY CVO STANDARDS. Be- cause it was established prior to the adoption of federal RCRA laws and prior to the. adoption of current state regulations, the owners/operators have NEVER FILED AN ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS DESIGN PLAN. The landfill has not been REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH CURRENT SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL LAWS! When the landfill was begun,. it was dug :ro.. THE GROUND,VATER, was UNLINED, and TRASH WAS DUMPED INTO STANDING WATER, all in a major drainage area, 1/2 mile from the Big Thompson River. REMEMBER, EVEN HOUSEHOLD WASTES SUCH AS PAINT CANS, SOLVENTS, CLEANERS AND GARDEN PESTICIDES CAN ENDANGER GROUND AND SURFACE WATER IF PLACID IN UNLINED DUMPS! The Greeley -Milliken duxrp has holding ponds on site, which collect water. It also has deep, dangerous trenches to divert groundwater and surface run-off. _ _ _ _ CONTAMINATION FROM HEAVY METALS is being detected in neighboring irrigation holding lakes. The headgates of these lakes are opened, the water leaves the lakes, goes into the irrigation ditches, finds its way through gravel beds and sloughs and INTO THE BIG THOMPSSON AND THEN INTO THE SOUTH PLATTE. IF THIS DUMP CONTINUES TO GO UNNOTICED, contamination of Colorado's surface and ground water will result. The state Department of Health, through its Solid and Hazardous Waste Division and the Division of Water Quality MUST BE URGED TO INVESTIGATE THE SOURCE OF THIS CONTAMINATION! PUBLIC ATTENTION AND PUBLIC HEARINGS must focus on this facility so that it is closed and any resulting contamination is treatod. Please join COLORADANS - CONCERNED OVER WATER (C-CDW) in focusing atten- tion on this serious problem. Indicate your concern by signing your name and address below. This petition will be given to the Colorado Department of Health, DEMANDING THAT THE LANDFILL Cc6PLY WITH CURRENT FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS. Nso? ).hA not, 111.0 ikur ( - rr ' c A livnnQ%rey, Address RDO . Q1I Arirrt m (hNQ�� '4/°°2---7-(4-0e., %?/ ( Asir, d)(0 1Wi-oLc n'liC (1 'Rvn )71 NOrr1e),4 1-6 (1 41602 f .Cowes 11411 '/12 177 (Z.0062.WITJ4 37 15 ZOO_ a'ZOGl 373 Denver ('C) %,,,% 0 931061 even thouqh .==8 aarnnul continues, and threatens to EXPAND, Ault a a large, lined and buffered facility' dry lands is located near thas planned near Ebensburg. The Greeley -Milliken landfill is UNREGULATED BY CURRENT SPANIARDS. Be- cause it was established prior to the adoption of federal RCFA laws and prior to the adoption of current state regulations, the owners/operators have NEVER FILED AN ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS DESIGN PLAN. The landfill has not been REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH CURRENT SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL LAWS! When the landfill was begun, it was dug BEL w THE GROUNDWATER, was UNLINED, and TRASH WAS DUMPED INTO STANDING WATER, all in a major drainage area 1/2 mile frnu the Big Thompson River. REMEMBER, EVEN HOUSEHOLD WASTES SUCH AS PAINT CANS, SOLVENTS, CLEANERS AND GARDEN PESTICIDES CAN ENDANGER GROUND AND SURFACE WATER IF PLACED TN UNLINED DUMPS! water. The Greeley -Milliken dump has holding ponds on site, which collect water. It also has deep, dangerous trenches to divert groundwater and surface CONTAMINATION FROM HEAVY METALS is being detected in neighbdring-irrigation-holding lakes. The headgates of these lakes are opened, ffwater leaves the lakes, goes into the irrigation ditches, finds way through gravel beds and sloughs aid INTO THE BIG THOMPSON AND THEN of THE SOUTHPLATTE. IF THIS DUMP optIrmJEs TO GO UNNOTICED, contamination ofaCol ado's surfaceits Solid ground water will result. The state Department of Water Quality MUST BE URGED d Hazardous Waste Division and the Division of INVESTIGATE THE SOURCE OF THIS CONTAMINATION! PUBLIC ATTENTION AND PUBLIC HEARINGS must focus on this facility so that it is closed and any resulting contamination is treated. Please join COLORADANS - ODNCERNED OVER WATER (C-cw) in focusing atten- tioreon n this serious problem. Indicate your concern by signing your name and Hddrth D . This petition will be given to the Colorado Department of EMANDING THAT THE LANDFILL CcMPLY WITH CURRENT =mkt AND STATE LAWS. NsMQ !Clhcrfr late as -7; °"„ S�5 re,,-.-.I(osr C,� go Ponh Sr Fr Mtrim„ Y.01. $070/ / '< 1 y `� jet' jKrr4 )e77--8'711 ALE, G T4Y� &M Gilt TTti 44 6-rept7 l.. ?Noll o• /L 6 9" fly, 6;j_ Wi S �i /52 `6,7) 71 cGD6(\ 6- eelef ona Ault and another Splanned near Keensburg. - V The Greeley -Milliken landfill is UNREGULATED BY CURRENT STANDARDS. Be- cause it was established prior to the adoption of federal RCRA laws and prior to the adoption of current state regulations, the owners/operators have NEVER FILED AN ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS DESIGN PLAN. The landfill has not been REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH CURRENT SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL LAWS! When the landfill was begun, it was dug BELOW THE GROUNDWATER, was UNLINED, and TRASH WAS DUMPED Dab STANDING WATER, all in a major drainage area 1/2 mile from the Big Thompson River. REMEMBER, ESN HOUSEHOLD WASTES SUCH AS PAINT CANS, SOLVENTS, CLEANERS AND GARDEN PESTICIDES CAN ENDANGER GROUND AND SURFACE WATER IF PLAID IN UNLINED DUMPS! The Greeley -Milliken dump has holding ponds on site, which collect water. It also has deep, dangerous trenches to divert groundwater and surface run-off. - - - - CJDNTAMLNATION FROM HEAVY METALS is being detected in neighboring irrigation -holding lakes. The headgates of these lakes are opened, the water leaves the lakes, goes into the irrigation ditches, finds its way through gravel beds and sloughs and INTO THE BIG THOtPPSON AND THEN INTO THE SCJIH PLATTE. IF THIS LUMP CONTTNUES TO GO UNNOTICED, contamination of Colorado's surface and ground water will result. The state Department of Health, through its Solid and Hazardous Waste Division and the Division of Water Quality MUST BE URGED TO INVESTIGATE THE SOURCE OF THIS CONTAMINATION! PUBLIC ATTENTION AND PUBLIC HEARINGS must focus on this facility so that it is closed and any resulting contamination is treated. Please join COLORADANS - CONCERNED OVER WATER (C -COW) in focusing atten- tion on this serious problem. Indicate your concern by signing your name and address below. This petition will be given to the Colorado Department of Health, DEMANDING THAT THE LANDFILL COMPLY WITH CURRENT FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS. Ns?L2 Address ,(14;---(4a 1 }ylatli".�.rt /r �...nft,., & cc It'h-E!t t-01ano}2QQ ic: y J. G. a rl�. Yew ZL� Cc z9(ercA6c3( col C',epeCet /663 am 4c �t4 Aj Citelccv k:0-, 7 t u e cf1„ r "1,-/t0 h'06, sac fa: p 144/719 wince i /J tfiej cat, -'y, c o Yod cf57 r1/if�f! /2 en" c0 ik IX ;` -6c- colf Or. Pnlo,c tict $0409o'z 17cd(tc lkic)ottf,02O 0S:4/2, <n/ 5 ?OP Ault and another •planned near Keensburg. The Greeley -Milliken landfill is UNREGULATED BY CURRENT STANDARDS. Be- cause it was established prior to the adoption of federal RCRA laws and prior to the adoption of current state regulations, the owners/operators have NEVER FILED AN ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS DESIGN PLAN. The landfill has not been REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH CURRENT SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL LAWS! When the landfill was begun, it was dug BELOW THE GROUNDWATER, was UNLINED, and TRASH WAS DUMPED INTO STANDING WATER, all in a major drainage area 1/2 mile from the Big Thompson River. REMEMBER, EVEN HOUSEHOLD WASTES SUCH AS PAINT CANS, SOLVENTS, CLEANERS AND GARDEN PESTICIDES CAN ENDANGER GROUND AND SURFACE WATER IF PLACED IN UNLINED DUMPS! The Greeley -Milliken dump has holding ponds on site, which collect water. It also has deep, dangerous trenches to divert groundwater and surface run-off. . - - - CONTAMINATION FROM HEAVY METALS is being detected in neighboring irrigation -holding lakes. The headgates of these lakes are opened, the water leaves the lakes, goes into the irrigation ditches, finds its way through gravel beds and sloughs and INTO THE BIG THOMPSON AND THEN INTO THE SOUR! PLATTE. IF THIS DUMP CONTINUES TO GO UNNOTICED, contamination of Colorado's surface and ground water will result. The state Department of Health, through its Solid and Hazardous Waste Division and the Division of Water Quality MUST BE URGED TO INVESTIGATE THE SOURCE OF THIS CONTAMINATION! PUBLIC ATTENTION AND PUBLIC HEARINGS must focus on this facility so that it is closed and any resulting contamination is treated. Please join COLORADANS - CONCERNED OVER WATER (C -00W) in focusing atten- tion on this serious problem. Indicate your concern by signing your name and address below. This petition will be given to the Colorado Department of Health, DEMANDING THAT THE LANDFILL COMPLY WITH CURRENT FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS. Name YYikrii a_ -1tr77 1,7\ fly 1 k tti• `'t''\; CC\; i Address (o'r / Ritt,iwi-i O `"l L ) , l? 47 r :'/:41/1 %r �`I 4 ))c3 -c' c. •%s cat, ''G C•/• „ n, ' Are. n`7 ff i.r•• /'¼/4 ee44/s kL4 SoapC L c�h r C.? L _bOd Pc /en'? /25 /W i. (c7LQ' /7rLg(weee cgleP r )z� (Path 3/ ,0" S,a\,o_AA,0 .„ Cd ntlost Ault and another islik ed near Keensbuzg. 4 The Greeley -Milliken landfill is UNREGULATED BY CURRENT STANDARDS. Be- cause it was established prior to the adoption of federal RCRA laws and prior to the adoption of current state regulations, the owners/operators have NEVER FILED AN ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS DESIGN PLAN. The landfill has not been REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH CURRENT SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL LAWS! When the landfill was begun, it was dug BELOW SHE GMUNDWATER, was UNLINED, and TRASH WAS EUMPED INTO STANDING WATER, all in a major drainage area 1/2 mile from the Big Thompson River. REMEMBER, EVEN HOUSEHOLD ' SUCH AS PAINT CANS, SOLVENTS, CLEANERS AND GARDEN PESTICIDES CAN ENDANGER GROUND AND SURFACE WATER IF PLACID IN UNLINED DUMPS! The Greeley -Milliken dump has holding ponds on site, which collect water. It also has deep, dangerous trenches to divert groundwater and surface run-off. - ;, .,•CbNTAMINATION FROM HEAVY METALS is being detected in neighboring irrigation -holding lakes. The headgates of these lakes are opened, the water leaves the lakes, goes into the irrigation ditches, finds its way through gravel beds and sloughs and INTO THE BIG THCI4PSON AND THEN INTO THE SOUTH PLATTE. IF THIS DUMP CONTINUES TO GO UNNOTICED, contamination of Colorado's surface and groundwater will result. The state Department of Health, through its Solid and Hazardous Waste Division and the Division of Water Quality MUST BE URGED TO INVESTIGATE THE SOURCE OF THIS CONTA flUTION! PUBLIC ATTENTION AND PUBLIC HEARINGS must focus on this facility so that it is closed and any resulting contamination is treated. Ple2Ge join COUORADANS - OONCERNED OVER WATER (C -COW) in focusing atten- tion on this serious problem. Indicate your concern by signing your name and address below. This petition will be given to the Colorado Department of Health, DEMANDING THAT THE LANDFILL OOMPLY WITH CURRENT FEDERAL AND STATE � LAWS.. 1WS C`/ b et47 IS -4(.44s S L 1 -✓i.4 C J 41.o m, `)Lip ainfAJ O(zdf_z_1, &&1L.LG. Address I// Aveavee rat 11 J-063// OQ( // "loci rise /my /CO 1O63/ '/Zl _5+1)- 4c /4 6NreIo/.tl63/ a9vi /T'^ atilt it- aoi,.1;Co. 806.31 -517-7 /.9 0 y y " _L re m�j iJ.t? Writ .2 74 ?co "31061 even though a largeatned and buffered facTity in ].ands is located near Ault and another is d near Keansburg. The Greeley -Milliken landfill is UNREGULATED BY CURRENT STANDARDS. Be- cause it was established prior to the adoption of federal RSA laws and prior to the adoption of current state regulations, the owners/operators have NEVER FILED AN ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS DESIGN PLAN. The landfill has not been REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH CURRENT SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL LAWS! When the landfill was begun, it was dug BELOW THE GROUNUaTER, was UNLINED, and TRASH WAS DUPED INTO STANDING WATER, all in a major drainage area l/2 mile from the Big Thompson River. REMEMBER, EVEN HOUSEHOLD WASTES SUCH AS PAINT CANS, SOLVENTS, CLEANERS AND GARDEN PESTICIDES CAN ENDANGER GROUND AND SURFACE WATER IF PLACED IN UNLINED DUMPS! The Greeley -Milliken dump has holding ponds on site, which collect water. It also has deep, dangerous trenches to divert grouzdwater and surface run-off. - <a .z ODNTAIDIUTION FRAM HEAVY METALS is being detected in neighboring irrigation -holding lakes. The headgates of these lakes are opened, the water leaves the lakes, goes into the irrigation ditches, finds its way through gravel beds and sloughs and INTO THE BIG THO+IPS0N AND THEN INTO THE SOUTH PLATTE. IF THIS DUMP CONTINUES TO GO UNNOTICED, contamination of Colorado's surface and ground water will result. The state Department of Health, through its Solid and Hazardous Waste Division and the Division of Water Quality )VST BE URGED TO INVESTIGATE THE SOURCE OF THIS CON iATION! PUBLIC ATTENTION AND PUBLIC HEARINGS must focus on this facility so that it is closed and any resulting contamination is treated. Pleat join CDLORADANS - CONCERNED OVER WATER (C -COW) in focusing atten- tion on this serious problem. Indicate your concern by signing your name and address below. This petition will be given to the Colorado Department of Health, DEMANDING THAT THE LANDFILL COMPLY WITH CUJRREN: FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS. Nang Address -ik 01.0 ///;lei u «'AI /1.4 l /412— Laiziti JhFst I .20,4 rlC'u4Q})(i,. 11 eQ c‘c-L `-1-7t.ur/ ,c.? fro) Q • //r Me 5 id ?,. to? /2 1, L � ii1 N a✓.(-1,��1L77 (��A�CeniC, llq Q• l'c A \N.�1X.4). }CO/' /// Alr,c 0_4 L7) to A ri1 N . Dias' /// .ems cod pi o /J 931061 V[WIfL. NS. 1e L ec.f, fi[V.4I Lana aaa af..awa O.aa aven cncn27n a Large, lin and buffered facility in &Sands is located near Ault and another is rned near Keensburg. The Greeley -Milliken landfill is UNREGULATED BY CURRENT STANDARDS. Be- cause it was established prior to the adoption of federal RCRA laws and prior to the adoption of current state regulations, the owners/operators have NEVER FILED AN ENGD EEPD1G AND OPERATIONS nPSIGN PLAN. The landfill has not been RDQCJLRED TO COMPLY WITH CURRENT SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL LAWS! When the landfill was begun, it was dug BELGw THE GROUNDWATER, was UNLINED, and TRASH WAS DUMPED INTO STANDING WATER, all in a major drainage area 1/2 mile from the Big Thompson River. REMEMBER, EVEN HOUSEHOLD WASTES SUCH AS PAINT CANS, SOLVENTS, CLEANERS AND GARDEN PESTICIDES CAN ENDANGER GROUND AND SURFACE WATER IF PLACID IN UNLINED DUMPS! The Greeley -Milliken dump has holding ponds on site, which collect water. It also has deep, dangerous trenches to divert groundwater and surface 'run-off. - - CONTAMINATION FROM HEAVY METALS is being detected in neighboring�irrigatlon-holding lakes. The headgates of these lakes are opened, the water leaves the lakes, goes into the irrigation ditches, finds its way through gravel beds and sloughs and INTO THE BIG THOMPSON AND THEN INTO THE SOUTH PLATTE. IF THIS DUMP CDNTD4UES TO GO UNNOTICED, contamination of Colorado's surface and ground water will result. The state Department of Health, through its Solid and Hazardous Waste Division and the Division of Water. Quality MIST., BE tflC TO TSIV£STIGATE THE SOURCE OF 'ins CONTAMINATION! PUBLIC ATTENTION AND PUBLIC HEARINGS must focus on this facility so that it is closed and any resulting contamination is treated. Please join COLORADANS - CONCERNED OVER WATER (C-OOW) in focusing atten- tion on this serious problem. Indicate your concern by signing your name and address below. This petition will be given to the Colorado Department of Health, DEMANDING THAT THE LANDFILL COMPLY WITH CURRENT FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS. N J Address C L, c( .c $b 't. �) I., �- i�••L,e 2 ":47-7-1 3 od At>,,-a*,O) >:4-& J CO 4)9 U. Ipc.,,,—< t•; a / d :use // / L I �1 J��P , 50''/Jfp//4. V I4#1 f //'('I 7 -tit ./ c,- !"',5. 7/515 A/4 4 [/^s3 7 71 3-i Li (A , vLV J� Ci wc) 9:1061 HAVE A C -COW!• BE CONCERNED!! GREEELEY-PfILLIKEN LANDFILL Coloradans - Concerned Over Water (C-CLao is a group of concerned Colorado citizens who demand action by their elected representatives to protect public health and the environment. The Greeley -Milliken landfill is located in a MAJOR !RAGE AREA, 1/2 mile from the Big Thompson River and 1 1/2 miles from the South Platte River where the two rivers meet at Dos Rios. IN 1971, the Evans dump had reached capacity and the Greeley -Milliken landfill was proposed. Local farmers agreed to siting of the dump because they were promised it would be only an INTER1m DUMP, AND WOULD CLOSE NOT LATER THAN 1986, when a new site would be in operation. TODAY, 21 YEARS LATER, the Greeley -Milliken dump is still in operation, GROWING LARGER EACH DAY! The landfill continues, and threatens to EXPAND, even though a large, lined and buffered facility in dry lands is located near Ault and another is planned near Keensburg. The Greeley -Milliken landfill is UNREGULATED BY aWR121T STANDARDS. Be- cause it was established prior to the adoption of federal RCRA laws and prior to the adoption of current state regulations, the owners/operators have NEVER FILED AN ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS DESIGN PLAN. The landfill has not been REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH CSJRRENT SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL LANS! When the landfill was begun, it was dug BELOW THE GROUNDWATER, was UNLINED, and TRASH WAS DUMPED INTO STANDING WATER, all in a major drainage area 1/2 mile from the Big Thompson River. REMEMBER, EVEN HOUSEHOLD WASTES SUCH AS PAINT CANS, SOLVENTS, CLEANERS AND GARDEN PESTICIDES CAN ENDANGER GROUND AND SURFACE WATER IF PLACED IN UNLINED DUMPS! The Greeley -Milliken dump has holding ponds on site, which collect water. It also has deep, dangerous trenches to divert groundwater and surface 'run-off. _ - - - _ CONTAMINATION FROM HEAVY METALS is being detected in neighboring irrigation -holding lakes. The headgates of these lakes are opened, the water leaves the lakes, goes into the irrigation ditches, finds its way through gravel beds and sloughs and INTO THE BIG THOMPSON AND THEN INTO THE SOUTH PLATTE. IF THIS DUMP CONTINUES TO co UNNOTICED, contamination of Colorado's surface and ground water will result. The state Department of Health, through its Solid and Hazardous Waste Division and the Division of Water Quality MUST BE URGED TO INVESTIGATE THE SOURCE OF THIS CONTAMINATION! PUBLIC ATTENTION AND PUBLIC HEARINGS moist focus on this facility so that it is closed and any resulting contamination is treated. Plea' join COLORADANS - CONCERNED OVER WATER (C -00W) in focusing atten- tion on this serious problem. Indicate your concern by signing your name and address below. This petition will be given to the Colorado Department of Health, DEMANDING THAT THE LANDFILL.LANDFILL COMPLY WITH CURRENT FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS. Name Address .�7. y CO a.1r.�� \A -•,.,CE -37.at r Sinn CC G'o/SJ'4p/Jo7 (TheciP /Rio sp rt /of rTideie ( . 9:710c1 THAN 1986, when a new site would be in operation. TODAY, 21 YEARS LATER, the Greeley -Milliken dump is still in operation, GROWING LARGER EACH DAY! The landfill continues, and threatens to EXPAND, even though a large, lined and buffered facility in dry lands is located near Ault and another is planned near Keensburg. The Greeley -Milliken landfill is UNREGULATED BY CURRENT STANDARDS. Be- cause it was established prior to the adoption of federal RCRA laws and prior to the adoption of current state regulations, the owners/operators have NEVER FILED AN ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS DESIGN PLNN. The landfill has not been REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH CURRENT SOLID WASTE DISMAL LAWS! When the landfill was begun, it was dug BELOW THE GROUNDWATER, was UNLINED, and TRASH WAS DUMPED INTO STANDING WATER, all in a major drainage area 1/2 rile fran the Big Thompson River. REMEMBER, EVEN HOUSEHOLD WASTES SUCH AS PAINT CANS, SOLVENTS, CLEANERS AND GARDEN PESTICIDES CAN ENDANGER GROUND AND SURFACE WATER IF PLACED IN UNLINED DUMPS! (N.1/ ..WA.L/ ...LN.G AIWA Ltiar..% The Greeley -Milliken dung has holding ponds on site, which collect water. It also has deep, dangerous trenches to divert gro ndwdter and surface run-off. . - - CONTAMINATION FROM HEAVY METALS is being detected in neighboring irrigation -holding lakes. The headgates of these lakes are opened, the water leaves the lakes, goes into the irrigation ditches, finds its way though gravel beds and sloughs and INTO THE BIG THOMPSON AND THEN INTO 214E SOUTH PLATTE. IF THIS DUMP CONTINUES TO GO UNNOTICED, contamination of Colorado's surface and ground water will result. The state Department of Health, through its Solid and Hazardous Waste Division and the Division of Water Quality MUST 3E URGED TO INVESTIGATE THE SOURCE OF THIS CONTAMINATION! PUBLIC ATTENTION AND PUBLIC HEARINGS rarst focus on this facility so that it is closed and any resulting contamination is treated. Please join COLORADANS - CONCERNED OVER WATER (C-074) in focusing atten- tion on this serious problem. Indicate your concern by signing your name and address below. This petition will be given to the Colorado Department of Health, DEMANDING THAT THE IANDFI.T, COmPIX WITH CURRENT FEDERAL AND STATE TAWS. Name - it Ea L jektdia-g.,.i ess /, 1 U1•: . D Ccisit". "t/'�r ��i•,��'��"�. _L ti St 3/ e.7Lirte,eafzAe2.42,, C 3 Sri iLa/e/c..J (a ?as 3'7 /I/ N � , 17 (Pe/3.z/°v 5 03063 (0 Q��, Co so \\\\ Ault and another illplanned near Keen_sburg. • The Greeley -Milliken landfill is UNREGULATED BY CURRENT STANDARDS. Be- cause it was established prior to the adoption of federal RCRA laws and prior to the adoption of current state regulations, the c here/operators have NEVER FILED AN -ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS DESIGN PLAN. The landfill has not been REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH CURRENT SOLdD WASTE DISPOSAL LAWS! When the landfill was begun, it was dug BELOW THE GROUNaTh6TER, was UNLINED, and TRASH WS DUMPED INTO STANDING WATER, all in a major drainage area 1/2 mile from the Big Thompson River. REMEMBER, EVEN HOUSEHOLD WASTES SUCH AS PAINT CANS, SOLVENTS, CLEANERS AND GARDEN PESTICIDES CAN ENDANGER GROUND AND SURFACE WATER IF PLACED IN UNLINED DUMPS! The Greeley Milliken dump has holding ponds on site, which collect water. It also has deep, dangerous trenches to divert groundwater and surface run-off. _ , — _ - CONTAMINATION FROM HEAVY METALS is being detected in neighboring irrigation -holding lakes. The headgates of these lakes are opened, the water leaves the lakes, goes into the irrigation ditches, finds its way through gravel beds and sloughs and INTO THE BIG THCMPSSON AND THEN INTO THE SOUTH PLATTE. IF THIS DUMP CONTINUES TO GO UNNOTICED, contamination of Colorado's surface and ground water will result: The state Department of Health, through its Solid and Hazardous Waste Division and the Division of Water Quality MUST BE URGED TO INVESTIGATE THE SOURCE OF THIS CONTAMINATION! PUBLIC ATTENTION AND PUBLIC BEARINGS must focus on this facility so that it is closed and any resulting contamination is treated. PIPacn join COLORADANS - CONCERNED OVER WATER (C -00W) in focusing atten- tion on this serious problem. Indicate your concern by signing your name and address below. This petition will be given to the Colorado Department of Health, DEMANDING THAT THE LANDFILL COMPLY WITH CURRENT FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS. Nam 8ddress s ,`e`7 is; CL-3-r-e4rar tezYz (96`-' cr C-�455c67,c0 a c S„ r‘sot I p l> /Ce(cat( 17r= Leti• %P -1s.• L 11 lr--cc (r.f 2.,4 4,4,2: ,sen TO- &x&xZ23 C- reale, C'oelbl01? ry ej-,.e Cfi Erre-e &92'J,Sciei-rfiA. c(4 Z gar) COJ! GcQe\tz,.% chgr.p-) ?. rMQ.Cb , cn L -k,11, C 11 931061 Ault and another Manned near iceensburq. J The Greeley -Milliken landfill is UNREGULATED BY CURRENT STANDARDS. Be- cause it was established prior to the adoption of federal RCRA laws and prior to the adoption of current state regulations, the owners/operators have NEVER FILED AN ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS DESIGN PLAN. The landfill has not been REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH CURRENT SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL LAWS! When the landfill was begun, it was dug BELOW THE GROUNDw ATER, was UNLINED, and TRASH WAS DUMPED INTO STANDING WATER, all in a major drainage area 1/2 mile frau the Big Thompson River. REMEMBER, EVEN HOUSEHOLD WASTES SUCH AS PAINT CANS, SOLVENTS, CLEANERS AND GARDEN PESTICIDES CAN ENDANGER GROUND AND SURFACE WATER IF PLACED IN UNLINED DUMPS! The Greeley Milliken dump has holding ponds on site, which collect water. It also has deep, dangerous trenches to divert groundwater and surface run-off. _ _ - CONTAMINATION FROM HEAVY METALS is being detected in' neighboring irrigation -holding lakes. The headgates of these lakes are opened, the water leaves the lakes, goes into the irrigation ditches, finds its way through gravel beds and sloughs and INTO THE BIG THOMPSON AND THEN INTO THE SOUTH PLATTE. IF THIS DUMP CONTINUES TO GO UNNOTICED, contamination of Colorado's surface and ground water will result. The state Department of Health, through its Solid and Hazardous Waste Division and the Division of Water Quality MUST BE URGED TO INVESTIGATE THE SOURCE OF THIS CONTAMINATION! PUBLIC ATTENTION AND PUBLIC HEARINGS mast focus on this facility so that it is closed and any resulting contamination is treated. Please join COLORADANS - CONCERNED OVER WATT (C -COW) in focusing atten- tion on this serious problem. Indicate your concern by signing your name and address below. This petition will be given to the Colorado Department of Health, DEMANDING THAT THE LANDFILL coMPLY WITH CURRENT FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS. Fame Addres* r/c t n� %h4 4< 1G4 P0ww ► libus .ARlaiu-LCAJ /s06 //r/7 Ave_ hreeki, cc_ 8o,‘3/ 2309' �,9/1e A;5zc/ t0‘ 7/ 509 !£- S4 -'.C{ "1Zc. eirc«t-r-1 EO(a31 5u r,‘•\ 107 6ypa /a,, C(d/6; 4 eZZO4 r), , vCe f W 1 .,O x, i2 G'r.er lli r . &�JG 37 /0. &x 472. Cre.cieet 80to32 1530 6Th M. 60_0,04u6080&31 153. \A‘CISZa%Lt, (23( ( 931061 • t.... even though a large, d and buffered facility in xis is located near Ault and another is pROFned near Yeensbut g. T The Greeley -Milliken landfill. is UNRDGUIATED BY cuma STANL RD6. Be- cause it was established prior to the adoption of federal RCRA laws and prior to the adoption of current state regulations, the owners/operators have NEVER FILED AN ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS DESIGN PLAN. The landfill has not been REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH CURRENT SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL TANS! When the landfill was begun, it was dug BELOW THE GROUNDWATER, was UNLINED, and TRASH WAS DUMPED INTO STANDING WATER, all in a major drainage area 1/2 mile from the Big Thompson River. REMEMBER, EVEN HOUSEHOLD WASTES SUCH AS PAINT CANS, SOLVENTS, CLEANERS AND GARDEN PESTICIDES CAN ENDANGER CRDIND AND SURFACE WATER IF PLACED IN UNLINED DUMPS! The Greeley Milliken dutrp has holding ponds on site, which collect water. It also has deep, dangerous trenches to divert groundwater and surface run-off. ._ a CONTAMINATION FROM HEAVY METALS is being detected in neighboring irrigation -holding lakes. The headgates of these lakes are opened, the water leaves the lakes, goes into the irrigation ditches, finds its way through gravel beds and sloughs and INTO THE BIG THOMPSON AND THEN INTO THE SOUTH PLATTE. IF THIS DUMP CONTINUES TO GO UNNOTICED, contamination of Colorado's surface and ground water will result. The state Department of Health, through its Solid and Hazardous Waste Division and the Division of Water Quality MUST BE URGED TO INVESTIGATE THE SOURCE OP THIS CON AMMTION! PUBLIC ATTENTION AND PUBLIC HEARINGS rust focus on this facility so that it is closed and any resulting contamination is treated. Please join COLORADANS - OONCERNED OVER WATER (C-074) in focusing atten- tion on this serious problem. Indicate your concern by signing your name and address below. This petition will be given to the Colorado Department of Health, DEMANDING THAT THE LANDFILL COMPLY WITH CURRENT FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS. Nsizv\/ L.Q. L ,00 yo A0 -1- !U 1 I'' ;//y,',26, A ai fot (L, _� ��.. A~ -2.OT .(a-w(E+. _ t k/ ?too/0 110O s, Akf E. 1 JD ,c. - 817 ( 11(7 C . ckt,,,,,i>t, w_.r GO Wzt0 Iytacoti'( A' CIA0PAlK;'Po o/d llbSO Sc abet_ /vV JJSv✓'R, 6ry /� //') / coz3( 931061 •041•611•••••••1 �ric�a� urra• AMY HAVE A C-COW1I BE CONCERNED!! GREEELEY-,LIKEN LANDFILL Coloradans - Concerned Over Water (CHOW) is a gzwp of concerned Colorado citizens who demand action by their elected representatives to protect public health and the environment. The Greeley -Milliken landfill is located in a MANOR DRAINAGE AREA, 1/2 mile from the Big Thompson River and 1 1/2 miles from the South Platte River where the two rivers meet at Dos Rios. IN 1971, the Evans dump had reached capacity and the Greeley- Milliken landfill was proposed. Tnral farmers agreed to siting of the dump because they were promised it would be only an INTERIM DUMP, AND WOULD CLOSE NOT LATER THAN 1986, when a new site would be in operation. TODAY, 21 YEARS LATER, the Greeley Milliken dump is still in operation, CROWING LAVER EAC5! DAY! The landfill continues, and threatens to EXPAND, even though a large, lined and buffered facility in dry lands is located near Ault and another is planned near Ebensburg. The Greeley -Milliken landfill is UNREGULATED BY CURRENT STANDARDS. Be- cause it, was established prior to the adoption of federal RCRA laws and prior to the adoption of current state regulations, the owners/operators have NEVER FILED AN ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS DESIGN PLAN. The landfill has not been REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH CURRENT SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL LAWS! When the landfill was begun, it was dug BELOW THE GROUNDWATER, ONDWATE R, was UNLINED, and TRASH WAS DUMPED INTO STANDING WATER,, all in a major drainage area 1/2 sale from the Big Thompson River. REMEMBER, EVEN HOUSEHOLD WASTES SUCH AS PAINT CANS, SOLVENTS, CLEANEIRS AND GARDEN PESTICIDES CAN ENDANGE2 CIOUND AND SURFACE WATER IF PLACED IN UNLINED DUMPS! The Greeley -Milliken dump has holding ponds on site, which collect water. It also has deep, dangerous trenches to divert groundwater and surface run-off. .. — CONTAMINATION FROM HEAVY METALS is being detected in neighboring -irrigation -holding lakes. The headgates of these lakes are opened, the water leaves the lakes, goes into the irrigation ditches, finds its way through gravel beds and sloughs and INTO THE BIG THOMPSON AND THEN INTO THE SOUTH PLATTE. IF THIS DUMP CONTINUES TO GO UNNOTICED, Contamination of Colorado's surface and ground water will result. The state Department of Health, through its Solid and Hazardous Waste Division and the Division of Water Quality MUST BE URcro TO ]NVFT'Tr3TE TYiF SrfiRCF OF THIS MMTA_-7.! :17. C"'! PUBLIC ATTENTION AND PUBLIC HEARINGS must focus on this facility so that it is closed and any resulting contamination is treated. Please join CDIDRADANS - CONCERNED OVER WATER (C -NIP) in focusing atten- tion on this serious problem. Indicate your concern by signing your name and address below. This petition will be given to the Colorado Department of Health, DEMANDING THAT THE LANDFILL COMPLY WITH CURRENT FEDERAL AND STATE TAWS. Name Address / IA ---aLtcden- Ly it ?A"?' I ry _7_7a3 67p,dat (41 avoo1 (,� L4�. .I(.'C/e` /?-0- s. waxi,c ,,... )3P., tJ 2/DZ1J . F: ]do,,q,4U �'1 2Oz3fo lv 4//3-2‘ -{74M-1,11-CS ft/o/ 5 JadtpcaA96t -Eo23, /`IU? ,at,+rz.e c th ayo.cx,/ 2_1_6,‘, S• Ce4Lonitr,erSr Eb2_ 8 .; . s. 9310171. IllHAVE A C -COW BE CONCERNED!! GREEELE -MILLIKEN LANDFILL Coloradans - Concerned Over Water (C -00W) is a group of concerned Colorado citizens who demand action by their elected representatives to protect public health and the environment. The Greeley -Milliken landfill is located in a MAJOR DRAINAGE AREA, 1/2 mile from the Big Thompson River and 1 1/2 miles fran the South Platte River where the two rivers meet at Dos Rios. IN 1971, the Evans dump had reached capacity and the Greeley- Milliken landfill was proposed. Local farmers agreed to siting of the dump because they were premised it would be only an INI'E RLM DUMP, AND WOULD CLOSE NOT LATER THAN 1986, when a new site would be in operation. TODAY, 21 YEARS LATER, the Greeley -Milliken dump is still in operation, GROWING LARGER EACH DAY! The landfill continues, and threatens to EXPAND, even though a large, lined and buffered facility in dry lands is located near Ault and another is planned near Kees rug. The Greeley -Milliken landfill is UNREGGZATED BY CURRENT STANDARDS. Be- cause it was established prior to the adoption of federal RCRA laws and prior to the adoption of current state regulations, the owners/operators have NEVER FILED AN ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS DESIGN PLAN. The landfill has not been REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH CURRENT SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL LAWS! When the landfill was begun, it was dug BELOW THE GROUNDWATER, was UNLINED, and TRASH WAS DUMPED INTO STANDING WATER, all in a major drainage area 1/2 mile from the Big Thompson River. REMEMBER, EVEN HOUSEHOLD WASTLS SUCH AS PAINT CANS, SOLVENTS, CLEANERS AND GARDEN PESTICIDES CAN ENDANGER GROUND AND SURFACE WATER IF PLACED IN UNLINED DUMPS! The Greeley -Milliken dump has holding ponds on site, which collect water. It also has deep, dangerous trenches to divert groundwater and surface run-off. - _ _ - - - CONTAMIIQATION FROM HEAVY METALS is being detected in neighboring irrigation -holding lakes. The headgates of these lakes are opened, the water leaves the lakes, goes into the irrigation ditches, finds its way through gravel beds and sloughs and INTO THE BIG THPTSON AND THEN INTO THE SOUTH PLATTE. IF THIS DUMP CONTINUES TO GO UNNOTICED, contamination of Colorado's surface and ground water will result. The state Department of Health, through its Solid and Hazardous Waste Division and the Division of Water Quality MUST BE URGED TO INVESTIGATE THE SOURCE OF THIS CONTA TTON! PUBLIC ATTENTION AND PUBLIC HEARINGS mast focus on this facility so that it is closed and any resulting contamination is treated. Please join COLORADANS - ooNCERNED OVER WATER (O-07.9 in focusing atten- tion on this serious problem. Indicate your concern by signing your name and address below. This petition will be given to the Colorado Department of Health, DEMANDING THAT THE LANDFILL COMPLY WITH CURRENT FOCERAL AND STATE LAWS. Address 4,,t4 gil ,�/ v %/ 6471 57,i tcS 6s,., N.. 1/ et .5 /�#1 •'..C 10-n Sc_t_ \-\r\cf\Dpn \\cLU CO3 TLrr $ aa- Ira rr i 50 y-i c1 Alattrlr6tio J 123 garrign 505 Tu c{,ex w It bite � 310 I'1 Coupe (70 1) T c r,&cc Chars -t-: \ (7 u6 0voer q& a / i'e < /3 931061 even no JacuER EACH DAY! The landfill liken , � tens ttooBzXP�, Ault and ano is�pi ed'r rg..twi-in pay lands is located ��uxJ. near The Greeley -Milliken landfill is UNREGULATED Be- cause it was established prior to the ado �. for � the adoption of current state adoption of federal RCRAFILED AN ENGINEERING regulations, the owners/operators laws and NEVER G AND 0PERATT0NS DESIGN The landfill has have obeen REQUIRED To COMPLY WITH PLATT. The landfill has was fin, it was dug BELOW SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL not been INTO STANDING GROLNDWATER, am! When Tthe landfill INTOSThompson DiveREMEMBER,,all in a major drainage area 1UNLINED, ite from and the BWAS DUMPED ig IN, CLEANERS AND DUMP'S! PES`1ICIDES HOUSEHOLD ENDANGER STESGROUND SUCH AS SPAINTURFACE CANS, BFL , GROUNp AND SURFACE WATER IF PLACED run-off.2he Greet deep ndangerous trenches ponds on site, which collect water. It also has neighboring irrigation -holding ATIoN FROM HEAVY divert detected surface inds its are opened, the water leaves makes The hethe tir of the lakeing g gravel beds and sloughs goes into irrigation ditches, HEN INTO �thr+ou h SC PLATTE. IF THIS DU IS T THE BIG T,Oc AND THEN of Colorado's surface and ground water will result. UNNOTICED, Health, through its Solid and The stateDe contamination • Water Quality MUST BE URGED TO d Hazw tIs Waste Division and rho Division (Jr of INVE.ITGATE THE SOURCE OF THISCONTAMINATION! it is cP osedIC and ON AND PUBLIC BEARINGS must focus on any resulting contamination is treated. this facility so that Lion on lease �n COLDRADANS - CPcERATED WATER C problem. Indicate your b) in focusing _ Health, address below. This petition will be took by signal your of and LAWS. ASAING THAT 7i� LANDFTLd, given Colorado Department Eaw NTPLY WITH CURRENT FEDERAL AND TATE 2/ C ' tale Phi . Gonam�,� 25? Freotze,tc-k� 7 le/J- CO. 'Po sao 931061 Cv cae 8.063/ Ault and another !planned near Reensburg. The Greeley -Milliken landfill is UNREGUIATED BY CURRENT STAf0ARDS. Be- cause it was established prior to the adoption of federal RCFA laws and prior to the adoption of current state regulations, the cw ners/operators have NEVER FILED AN.ENGINFRIG AND OPERATIONS DESIGN PLAN. The landfill has not been REQUIRED TO ODDLY WITH CURRENT SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL LAWS! When the landfill was begun, it was dug BELOW THE cRcuNEAATER, was UNLINED, and TRASH WAS DUMPS) INTO STANDING WATER, all in a major drainage area 1/2 mile from the Big Thomson River. REmEmBER, EVEN HOUSEHOLD WASTES suai AS PAINT CANS, S0LVWIS, CLEANERS AND GARDEN PESTICIDES CAN ENDANGER GROUND AND SURFACE WATER IF PLACED IN UNLINED DUMPS! The Greeley -Milliken dump has holding ponds on site, which collect water. It also has deep, dangerous trenches to divert groundwater and surface run-off. . - r CONTAMINATION FROM HEAVY mass is being detected in neighboring irrigation -holding lakes. The headgates of these lakes are opened, the water leaves the lakes, goes into the irrigation ditches, fines its way through gravel beds and sloughs and INTO THE BIG THOMPSON AND THEN INTO THE SOUTH PLATTE. IF THIS DUMP CONTINUES TO GO UNNOTICED, contamination of Colorado's surface and ground water will result. The state Department of Health, through its Solid and Hazardous Waste Division and the Division of Water Quality MUST BE URGED TO INVESTIGATE THE SOURCE OF THIS CON' TION! AJBLIC ATTENTION AND PUBLIC BEARINGS must focus on this facility so that it is closed and any resulting contamination is treated. Please join COLORAD NS - CONCERNED OVER WATER (C -00W) in focusing atten- tion on this serious problem. Indicate your concern by signing your name and address below. This petition will be given to the Colorado Department of Health, DEMANDLi G THAT THE LANDFILL ComPLY WT1H CVRRE2'T EFDEIAL AND STATE LAWS. ' Address toy,rank1Lsd, t �fl th _ c -s .tbC FcA Qmr vc_ 44/3 4°4 71)2h er+v' kve � goal r?7.z `1? "'Kt' AAA r: rr $c 631. . ?cl /c ` Ad e Cl cite &e 4'1\,)e t 7) 3/ [711 l0 h AN/6 egXo31 lc/7/P, 7°G/Gc0e aciLt 206/0 1366 er-- SC G y Baal THAN 1986, when a i site would be in operation. TODAY, 21 YEARS LATER, the Greeley -Milliken dump is still in operation, CAWING LARGER EACH DAY! The landfill continues, and threatens to EXPAND, even though a large, lined and buffered facility in dry lands is located near Ault and another is planned near Xeensburg. The Greeley -Milliken landfill is UNREGULATED BY CURRENT STANDARDS. Be- cause it was established prior to the adoption of federal RCA laws and prior to the adoption of current state regulations, the amens/operators have NEVER FILED AN ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS DESIGN PLAN. The landfill has not been REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH CURRENT SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL TAWS! When the landfill was begun, it was dug BELOW THE GROUNDWATER, was UNLINED, and TRASH WAS DUMPED INTO STANDING WATER, all in a major drainage area 1/2 mile from the Big Thompson River. RDEME R, EVEN HOUSEHOLD WASTES SUCH AS PAINT CANS, SOLVENTS, CLEANERS AND GARDEN PESTICIDES CAN ENDANGER GROUND AND SURFACE WATER IF PLACED IN UNLINED DUMPS! The Greeley -Milliken dump has holding ponds on site, which collect water. It•also has deep, dangerous trenches to divert groundwater and surface 'run-off. _ _ .. coNTAMINATION Flat HEAVY METALS is being detected in neighboring irrigation -holding lakes. The headgates of these lakes are opened, the water leaves the lakes, goes into the irrigation ditches, finds its way through gravel bnlc and sloughs and INTO THE BIG THOMPSON AND THIN INTO THE SOUTH PLATTE. IF THIS DUMP CONTINUES TO CO UNNOTICED, contamination of Colorado's surface and ground water will result. The state Department of Health, through its Solid and Hazardous Waste Division and the Division of Water Quality MUST BE URGED TO INVESTIGATE THE SOURCE OF THIS CONTAMINATION! PUBLIC ATTENTION AND PUBLIC HEARINGS must focus on this facility so that it is closed and any resulting contamination is treated. Please join ClOLORADANS - CONCERNED WATER (C -COW) in focusing atten- tion on this serious problem. Indicate your concern by signing your name and address below. This petition will be given to the Colorado Department of Health, DEMANDING THAT THE LANDFILL COMPLY WITH CURRENT FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS. i 'LtT,4 1 ,f/ 7 fry, ItY�i�ci1 • Dr Address n Iti':.u. ~r ;`) (is , iC: / -U 'r, 1P "_1r'4j /0 '�!Vi•"• Y//. 14101-0N/ � Q, ,_r)-41 refa even though a large, ined and buffered facility In .* iarun iy i�.fl a..a .,. Ault and another is�anned near Keansburg. The Greeley -Milliken landfill is UNREGULATED BY CURRE2I' SIWMPROS. Be- cause it was established prior to the adoption of federal RCRA laws and prior to the adoption of current state regulations, the owners/operators have NEVER FILED AN ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS DESIGN PLAN. The landfill has not been REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH CURRENT SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL LAWS! When the landfill was begun, it was dug BELOW THE GRCuNDWATER, was UNLINED, and TRASH WAS DUMPED INTO STANDING WATER, all in a major drainage area 1/2 mile from the Big Thompson River. REMEMBER, EVEN HOUSE2{OLD WASTES SUCH AS PAINT CANS, SOLVENTS, CLEANERS AND GARDEN PESTICIDES CAN ENDANGER GROUND AND SURFACE WATER IF PLACED IN UNLINED DOMES! The Greeley -Milliken dunp has holding ponds on site, which collect water. It also has deep, dangerous trenches to divert groundwater and surface run-off. _ - - - CONTAMINATION FROM HEAVY METAIS is being detected in neighboring irrigation -holding lakes. The headgates of these lakes are opened, the water leaves the lakes, goes into the irrigation ditches, finds its way through gravel beds and sloughs and INTO THE BIG THOMPSON AND THEN INTO THE SOUTH PLATTE. IF THIS DUMP CONTINUES TO GO UNNOTICED, contamination of Colorado's surface and ground water will result. The state Department cf Health, through its Solid and Hazardous Waste Division and the Division of Water Quality MUST BE URGED TO INVESTIGATE THE SOURCE OF THIS CONTAMINATION! PUBLIC ATTENTION AND PUBLIC HEARINGS must focus on this facility so that it is closed and any resulting contamination is treated. Please join COLORADANS - CONCERNED OVER WATER (C-QWW) in focusing atten- tion on this serious problem. Indicate your concern by signing your name aid address below. This petition will be given to the Colorado Department of Health, DEMANDING THAT THE LANDFILL COMPLY WITH CURRENT FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS. Name, Address ,' mot' W,c l2/7 %G,,,i/y, fl /,•tr(Mip 7FCI 1:311 6 U ErLx f2 . c:/Ac ,�; 6ilPfift4j t#Loo M7V b ,bad; 15o sr. . R (I cn 604110 /.0.311 Clithilarni auM.0/Ord\CO. a'J ) IQ CLite/opt, • C4' Fi• t oZz.,tcs k g2S 4tr+e Cb, $0,5-3C 1 I ,KpG^h...xrrAer Pt c11ir'cN,lr, A iii/ s C. J4' sd /%3/gel 57 1 ci C 6«;its,Lc back 971061 HAVE A C-COt BE CONCERNED!! GREEELE-.MILLIKEN LANDFILL Coloradans - Concerned Over Water (C -COW) is a group of concerned Colorado citizens who demand action by their elected representatives to protect public health and the environment. The Greeley -Milliken landfill is located in a MAJOR DRAINAGE AREA, 1/2 mile from the Big Thompson River and 1 1/2 miles from the South Platte River where the two rivers meet at Dos Rios. IN 1971, the Evans dump had reached capacity and the Greeley -Milliken landfill was proposed. In -al farmers agreed to siting of the dump because they were promised it would be only an INTERIM DUMP, AND WOULD aosE NOT LATER THAN 1986, when a new site would be in operation. TODAY, 21 YEARS LATER, the Greeley -Milliken dump is still in operation, CROWING LARGER EACH DAY! The landfill continues, and threatens to EXPAND, even though a large, lined and buffered facility in dry lands is located near Ault and another is planned near heensb rg. The Greeley -Milliken landfill is UNREGULATED BY CURRENT STANDARDS. Be- cause it was established prior to the adoption of federal RCRA laws and prior to the adoption of current state regulations, the owners/operators have NEVER FILED AN ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS DESIGN PLAN. The landfill has not been REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH CURRENT SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL LAWS! When the landfill was begun, it was dug BELOW THE GROUNDWATER, was UNLINED, and TRASH WAS DUMPED INTO STANDING WATER, all in a major drainage area 1/2 mile from the Big Thompson River, RffiSffiER, EVEN HCUSEHOLD WASTES SUCH AS PAINT CANS, SOLVENTS, CLEANERS AND GARDEN PESTICIDES CAN ENDANGER GROUND AND SURFACE WATER IF PLACED IN UNLINED DUMPS! The Greeley- Milliken dump has holding ponds on site, which collect water. It also has deep, dangerous trenches to divert groundwater and surface run-off. . - _ - - - CONTAMINATION FROM HEAVY METHS is being detected in neighboring irrigation -holding lakes. The headgates of these lakes are opened, the water leaves the lakes, goes into the irrigation ditches, finds its way through gravel beds and sloughs and INTO THE BIG THCMPSCN AND THEN INTO THE SOUTH PLATTE. IF THIS DUMP CONITNIM TO GO UNNOTICED, contamination of Colorado's surface and groundwater will result. The state Department of Health, through its Solid and Hazardous Waste Division and the Division of Water Quality MUST BE URGED TO T..NVn. n. cCE THE SOURCE OF '.^."...n C`l. N^. wv ".tail PUBLIC ATTENTION AND PUBLIC HEARINGS rust focus on this facility so that it is closed and any resulting contamination is treated. Please join C3OLDRAD]ANS - CONCERNED OVER WATER (C -COW) in focusing atten- tion on this serious problem. Indicate your concern by signing your name and address below. This petition will be given to the Colorado Department of Health, DEMANDING THAT THE LANDFILL COMPLY WITH CURRENT EEDIRALAND STATE LAWS. Name Address Sack,ke_? &kCY\ Ti�vf‘t.r O\\mow\-RO o C _ \-\\ ,yAiv6,',6v ; it? cl K / k 931061 facility in t lands is located near Ault and another isanned near Heensbuxg. The Greeley -Milliken landfill is UNREGULATED BY CURE r STANDARDS. Be- cause it was established prior to the adoption of federal RCRA laws and prior to the adoption of current state regulations, the cnmers/operators have NEVER FILED AN ENGftfllG AND OPERATIONS DESIGN PLAN. The landfill has not been REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH CURRENT SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL LAWS! When the landfill was begun, it was dug BE,LDW THE GROUNDWATER, was UNLINED, and TRASH WAS DUMPED INTO STANDING WAXER, all in a major drainage area 1/2 mile from the Big Thompson River. REMEMBER, EVEN HOUSEHOLD WASTES SUCH AS PAINT CANS, SOLVENTS, CLEANERS AND GARDEN PESTICIDES CAN ENDANGER GROUND AND SURFACE WATER IF PLACED IN UNLINED LUMPS! The Greeley Milliken dump has holding ponds on site, which collect water. It also has deep, dangerous trenches to divert groundwater and surface run-off. .. _ _ _ .., CONTAMINATION FROM HEAVY METALS is being detected in neighboring irrigation -holding lakes. The headgates of these lakes are opened, the water leaves the lakes, goes into the irrigation ditches, finds its way through gravel beds and sloughs and INTO THE BIG THOMPSON AND THEN INTO THE SOUTH PLATTE. IF THIS DUMP CONTINUES TO GO UNNOTICED, contamination of Colorado's surface and ground water will result. The state Department of Health, through its Solid and Hazardous Waste Division and the Division of Water Quality MUST BE URGED TO INVESTIGATE THE SOURCE OF THIS CONTAMINATION! PUBLIC ATTENTION AND PUBLIC HEARINGS rust focus on this facility so that it is closed and any resulting contamination is treated. Please join COLORADANS - OONCERNEI OVER WATER (C -ca) in focusing atten- tion on this serious problem. Indicate your concern by signing your name and address below. This petition will be given to the Colorado Department of Health, DEMANDING THAT THE LANDFILL COMPLY WITH CURRENT FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS. name 9-4-smuy LA,c, 0.NVIIV { �' l/t�i �ti-�'i F1 LI 71 n �"lit & C'r'rrti,-� /7? b-•1. Addss Lt tnt , \iv L 'a I VS- C^_vM.-73d4 s .1(4F .9057 )0 )Y 3.o )), 4.4 l 4 /�ffl A)1 'tee Lon "-IP/1 'eh re/ ,c.-5/31;1, 2-cite/A- (orq IAJQ /r/c go Eel Avg . (W.-, n 4:e7! — O atrC-Qa-P 931061 Ault and another Manned near Keensbusg. The Greeley -Milliken landfill is LTIl2.�-n 2U BY C cause it was established prior to the. adoption of fo to the adoption of current state regulation;, th:c FILED AN ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS DESIGN erne REQUIRED TO NMPLX WITH CURR rr' SOLID WASTE ..1:'.CC L .!_' . was begun, it was dug BELOW THE GRCUNCWATER, INTO STANDING WATER, all in a major drairy n 1/2 f:' Thompson River, REMEMBER, EVEN HOUSEHOLD 4Jsn: CLEANERS AND GARDEN PESTICIDES CAN ENDANGER c,,_r: ;• IN UNLINED WMPS! The Greeley -Milliken dun, has holding nords on cit-. water. It also has deep, dangerous trenchoo to di n -t run-off. _ _ r cONTAMINATION FesV neighboring irrigation -holding lakes. The :-,c..-1f7.7..tes o opened, the water leaves the lakes, goes i:-'-. 0 its way through gravel beds and sloughs an: )r:T W INTO THE SC(YIH PLATTE. IF THIS CUIP CONT272 :3 :O CO 7. ' of Colorado's surface and ground water will lt. - Health, through its Solid and Hazardous Waztc Divirden : Water Quality MUST BE URGED TO INVESTIGATE OUJRCE 0:' •:. PUBLIC ATTENTION AND PUBLIC HEAR#LNGS =it it is closed and any resulting contamination is Pleas join COLDRADANS - OONCERNED a'C. FGcT R (C tion on this serious problem. Indicate year conco.rn ry h address below. This petition will be give-; to tho Colo_-' Health, DEmANDING THAT THE LANDFILL CXd•NPLf ; .;: c R^;:. LAWS. HWIO -ane,L Miller Mott/ V aecnrnlr fC `ms`s(co, r\•cS -Pan far, n TockVI L I\ 1 =DARDS. Be - and prior c.. ; ave NEVER ._. _ landfill . WAS DUMPED gig SOLVENTS, IF PLACED collect :and surface =max c:__ected in' 1 are 1 finds D THEN ^tination .nt rt of :. Division of 3 Cv: .?,:CTION! ,'.`y so that fn focjz atten- your name and ^p..r-i-n nt of w . STATE 8063 -I" -��_,�t 918.3,1 13 r' 1 if, ev k ,e r1f_I � ��`•"� '`,;�o t - 74/9 S L Z(01, 3n1" <.' n- 2Q,tia 931061 Ault and anotheriiii'planned near xeensbutg. - • The Greeley -Milliken landfill is UNREGULATED BY CURRENT STANDARDS. Be- cause it was established prior to the adoption of federal RCRA laws and prior to the adoption of current state regulations, the owners/operators have NEVER FILED AN ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS DESIGN PLAN. The landfill has not been REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH CURRENT SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL LAWS! When the landfill was begun, it was dug BELOW THE GROUNDWATER, was UNLINED, and TRASH WAS DUMPED INTO STANDING WATER, all in a major drainage area 1/2 mile frau the Big Thompson River. REMEMBER, EVEN HOUSEHOLD WASTES SUCH AS PAINT CANS, SOLVENTS, CLEANERS AND GARDEN PESTICIDES CAN ENDANGER GROUND AND SURFACE WATER IF PLACED IN UNLINED DUMPS! The Greeley -Milliken dump has holding ponds on site, which collect water. It also has deep, dangerous trenches to divert groundwater and surface 'run-off. . _ - .. CONTAMINATION FROM HEAVY METALS is being detected in neighboring irrigation -holding lakes. The headgates of these lakes are opened, the water leaves the lakes, goes into the irrigation ditches, finds its way through gravel beds and sloughs and INTO THE BIG THCMPSON AND THEN INTO THE SOUTH PLATTE. IF THIS DUMP CONTINUES TO GO UNNOTICED, contamination of Colorado's surface and ground water will result. The state Department of Health, through its Solid and Hazardous Waste Division and the Division of Water Quality MUST BE URGED TO INVESTIGATE THE SOURCE OF THIS CONTAMBIATION! PUBLIC ATTENTION AND PUBLIC HEARINGS mist focus on this facility so that it is closed and any resulting contamination is treated. Please join COLORADANS - CONCERNED OVER WATER (C -COW) in focusing atten- tion on this serious problem. Indicate your concern by signing your name and address below. This petition will be given to the Colorado Department of Health, DEMANDING THAT THE LANDFILL. CON=LY WITH CURRENT FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS. Name Bddcess x/43 /.t -top soggy A ri2 /\ a",n / /'1CYCt„ s_3 c a t)i nrt wM ff Cc CZ(� �'YzLcZf ?,'mil/„- I t ?//e1 t. k � C\-.‘ 7:IAes -NV Co oS( /:G 2yli$ /5-519i (o/6,T°57/ L-2-= rY Al/it/6-4/ Co c o x131061 ' even though a laxg fined and buffered facility in lands is located near Ault and another itillplanned near xeensburg. The Greeley -Milliken landfill is UNREGULATED BY CURRENT STANDARDS. Be- cause it was established prior to the adoption of federal RCRA laws and prior to the adoption of current state regulations, the owners/operators have NEVER FILED AN ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS DESIGN PLAN. The landfill has not been REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH CURRENT SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL LAWS! When the landfill was begun, it was dug BELOW THE QdCUNDFATE12, was UNLINED, and TRASH WAS DUMPED INTO STANDING WATER, all in a major drainage area 1/2 mile from the Big Thompson River. REMEMBER, EVEN HOUSEHOLD WASTES SUCH AS PAINT CANS, SOLVENTS, CLEANERS AND GARDEN PESTICIDES CAN ENDANGER GROUND AND SURFACE WATER IF PLACED IN UNLINED DUMPS! The Greeley -Milliken dump has holding ponds on site, which collect water. It also has deep, dangerous trenches to divert groundwater and surface run-off. _ _ _ _ CONTAMINATION FROM HEAVY METALS is being detected in neighboringirrigation-holdinglakes. The headgates of these lakes are opened, the water leaves the lakes, goes into the irrigation ditches, finds its way through gravel YiAdc and sloughs and INTO THE BIG THOMPSON AND THEN INTO THE SOUTH PLATTE. IF THIS DUMP CONTINUES TO GO UNNOTICED, contamination of Colorado's surface and ground water will result. The state Department of Health, through its Solid and Hazardous Waste Division and the Division of Water Qiality MUST BE URGED TO INVESTIGATE THE SOURCE OF THIS CONTAMINATION! PUBLIC ATTENTION AND PUBLIC HEARINGS must focus on this facility so that it is closed and any resulting contamination is treated. Please join COLOR7DZNS - CONCERNED OVER WATER (C -COW) in focusing atten- tion on this serious problem. Indicate your concern by signing your name and address below. This petition will be given to the Colorado Department of Health, DEMANDING THAT THE LANDFILL COMPLY WITH CURRENT FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS. V 9 of OW • ') /014211-4.4 u (J 7" 1 Address n sOill 1 / h) ,,! ;' ter_) S/U 4dru� 1 4/tote-Cc. I9 /• C36C /J/c_CC-/Ch-e\• CI; % s;TEE Ts/Dill (.7!"1. , , 1' yr R rb.)! ^ - 1 � ` tr •/�r % • 1/447:4 �) -Z-7a sde- r • /•Cs 11:'(.11! 71•"I(` 1.;: N a Acts-... C..o. /02 n/ 15 SW ,n J lie:,a LI q 14 • (( 'e. r (o a ah`. ,l�f 1 /We U!'e //Z 52 ,c (o 331061 uxugn a large, lin arec�fbuf ezed facility /Wry lands is located near Ault anti another• planned near Keensburg. The Greeley -Milliken landfill is UNREGULATED BY CURRENT :STANDARDS. Be- cause it was established prior to the adoption of federal. RCRA laws and prior to the adoption of current state regulations, the owners/operators have NEVER FILED AN ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS DESIGN PLAN. The landfill has not been REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH CURRENT SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL LAWS! When the landfill was begun, it was dug BELOW THE GROUNDWATER, was UNLINED, and TRASH WAS DUMPED INTO STANDING WATER, all in a major drainage area 1/2 mile fran the Big Thompson River. REMEMBER, EVEN HOUSEHOLD WASTES SUCH AS PAINT CANS, SOLVENTS, CLEANERS AND GARDEN PESTICIDES CAN ENDANGER GROUND AND SURFACE WATER IF PLACED IN UNLINED DUMPS! The Greeley -Milliken dump has holding ponds on site, which collect water. It also has deep, dangerous trenches to divert groundwater and surface run-off. _ _ CONTAMINATION FROM HEAVY METALS is being detected in neighboring irrigation -holding lakes. The headgates of these lakes are opened, the water leaves the lakes, goes into the irrigation ditches, finds its way through gravel beds and sloughs and INTO THE BIG THOMPSON AND THEN INTO THE SOUTH PLATTE. IF THIS DID CONTINUES TO CO UNNOTICED, contamination of Colorado's surface and ground water will result. The state Department of Health, through its Solid and Hazardous Waste Division and the Division of Water Quality MUST BE UR'.ED To INVESTIGATE THE SOURCE OF THIS cor'Tn^...',F'':'1'C1'I! PUBLIC ATTENTION AND PUBLIC HEARINGS must focus an this facility so that it is closed and any resulting contamination is treated. Please join COLORADANS - CONCERNED OVER WATER (C-' W) in focusing atten- tion on this serious problem. Indicate your concern by signing your name and address below. This petition will be given to the Colorado Department of Health, DEMANDING THAT THE LANDFILL COMPLY WITH CURRENT FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS. Name A4ldress Don LO. eth PI 4 n± e Co "so )ao 47(6 w./YU -4 r lj PIA 11 I'. 7-)..“)\),,N, A• A 7 (71 (c)3° .) -, p r 51 ?f) C el eki Co 204 /1W(p )'aw-ht( 1» . free46 6(043 //O es, ,e/'x' • /gy7 �� / • C .: 4l, 6 �n 4,a. (-tree 9, 204Z I ceo SS/ 931061 HAVE A C -COI BE CONCERNED!! GREEELEY- ILLIKEN LANDFILL Coloradans - Concerned Over Water (C -00W) is a group of concerned Colorado citizens who demand action by their elected representatives to protect public health and the environment. The Greeley -Milliken landfill is located in a N JOR DRAINAGE AREA, 1/2 mile from the Big Thompson River and 1 1/2 miles from the South Platte River where the two rivers meet at Dos Rios. IN 1971, the Evans dump had reached capacity and the Greeley -Milliken landfill was proposed. Local farmers agreed to siting of the dump because they were promised it would be only an INTERIM DUMP, AND WOULD CLOSE NOT LATER THAN 1986, when a new site would be in operation. TODAY, 21 YEARS LATER, the Greeley -Milliken dump is still in operation, GROWING LARGER EACH DAY! The landfill continues, and threatens to EXPAND, even though a large, lined and buffered facility in dry lands is located near Ault and another is planned near Keensburg. The Greeley -Milliken landfill is TTNREG JII.ATED BY CURRENTSTANDARDS. Be- cause it was established prior to the adoption of federal RCRA laws and prior to the adoption of current state regulations, the owners/operators have NEVER FILED AN ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS DESIGN PLAN. The landfill has not been REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH'aIRRENT SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL LAWS! When the landfill was begun, it was dug BELOW THE GRCUND4ATER, was UNLINED, and TRASH WAS DUMPr7J INTO STANDING WATER, all in a major drainage area 1/2 mile from the Big Thompson River. REMEMBER, EVEN BWUSE1•IOLD WASTES SUCH AS PAINT CANS, SOLVENTS, CLEANERS AND GARDEN PESTICIDES CAN El1O NGER GROUND AND SURFACE WATER IF PLACED IN UNLINED DUMPS! The Greeley -Milliken dump has holding ponds on site, which collect water. It also has deep, dangerous trenches to divert groundwater and surface nun -off. _ _ _ _ _ CONTAMINATION F?a4 HEAVY ?ZLAIS is being detected in neighboring irrigation -holding lakes. The headgates of these lakes are opened, the water leaves the lakes, goes into the irrigation ditches, finds its way through gravel beds and sloughs and INTO THE BIG THCMPSON AND THEN INTO THE SMITH PLATTE. IF THIS DUMP CONTINUES TO GO UNNOTICED, contamination of Colorado's surface and ground water will result. The state Department of Health, through its Solid and Hazardous Waste Division and the Division of Water Quality )UST BE URGED TO INVESTIGATE THE SOURCE OF THIS CONTI,MCImtiMON! PUBLIC ATTENTION AND PUBLIC HEARINGS nest focus on this facility so that it is closed and any resulting contamination is treated. Please join COLOPADANS - CONCERNED OVER WATER (C• W) in focusing atten- tion on this serious problem. Indicate your concern by signing your name and address below. This petition will be given to the Colorado Department of Health, DEMANDING THAT THE LANDFILL COMPLY WITH CURRENT FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS. Name Address Toe -y I+o..rok y �1 HEN/ SJm(1a ly:ulR\ Y G�ck�heh G�•• if 3zan \-ao9S T), rkh 105,1_/71oV v. NA- (J/1^ -,---; -rot: fk.N0ial 100.3r2iQD,alit/ Canh'ol Ur();:s r�300 C1uR/ 4tt-k- sovklh ton arc 1' r r QC -2z 2 3Q? Tvrnor I}til 510 11 1' 5sti Orison 4&\ 7SL (AL.Gw6,J H PLC cif?. 7-.(% OPT 310 t.c) .t5 /17n; “,,, Lot, .•�. /16�,--` /O 9240G1 i it and a �orher �annea r,ear�iceensUurg. �R�� The Greeley -Milliken landfill is BY CUmayr STANDARDS. Be- cause it was established prior to the adoption of federal RQ?A laws and prior to the adoption of current state regulations, the owners/operators have NEVER FILED AN ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS DESIGN PLAN. The landfill has not been REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH CURRENT SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL LAWS! When the landfill was begun, it was dug BELOW THE GROUNDWATER, was UNLINED, and TRASH WAS DUMPED INTO STANDING WATER, all in a major drainage area 1/2 mile from the Big Thompson River. R fl , EVEN HYJSEHOLD WASTES SUCH AS PArar CANS, SOLVENTS, CLEANERS AND GARDEN PESTICIDES CAN ENDANGER GROUND AND SURFACE WATER IF PLACE IN UNLINED DUMPS! The Greeley Milliken dupp has holding ponds on site, which collect water. It also has deep, dangerous trenches to divert groundwater and surface (run-off. _ _ - _ CONTAMINATION FFCtf HEAVY METALS is being detected in' neighboring irrigation -holding lakes. The headgates of these lakes are opened, the water leaves the lakes, goes into the irrigation ditches, finds its way through gravel beds and sloughs and INTO THE BIG THOMPSON AND THEN INTO THE SOUTH PLATTE. IF THIS DUMP CONTINUES TO GO UNNOTICED, contamination of Colorado's surface and grind water will result.- The state Department of Health, through its Solid and Hazardous Waste Division aid the Division of Water Quality MUST BE URGED TO INVESTIGATE THE SOURCE OF THIS CONTAMENrATION! PUBLIC ATTENTION AND PUBLIC HEARINGS rust focus on this facility so that it is closed and any resulting contamination is treated. Please join COLORAD7iNS - CONCERNED OVER WATER (C -COW) in focusing atten- tion on this serious problem. Indicate your concern by signing your name and address below. This petition will be given to the Colorado Department of Health, DEMANDING THAT THE LANDFILL COMPLY WITH CURRENT FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS. Name Address / It( eiI Att. 0Gr-c.. /co.Yv63f 7eibi Us, P,0•6 2.71 (714/0 -8(1%) > 1'ca fl a't Cl/ St. 'MSc /izr 'V'5 -Gyres err-) o - (I //5‘ 14014 f co1 rt5 27 ti or .Aoc)le kve n%lei Rob5} rJo( lc/ 1 NW-ct' co 8%31 dfx 2S7, G^C-2ce' e.roo'dA 1z� "~ 931061 HAVE A C -COW! ! SE CONCERNED!! CREEELEY-MIOLIKEN LANDFILL Coloradans - Concerned Over Water (c- 0 is a group of concerned Colorado citizens who demand action by their elected representatives to protect public health and the environment. The Greeley Milliken landfill is located in a MAJOR DRAINAGE AREA, 1/2 mile from the Big Thompson River and 1 1/2 miles from the South Platte River where the two rivers meet at Dos Rios. IN 1971, the Evans dump had reached capacity and the Greeley -Milliken landfill was proposed. Toca1 farmers agreed to siting of the dump because they were promised it would be only an INTERIM DUMP, AND WOULD CLOSE NOT LATER THAN 1986, when a new site would be in operation. TODAY, 21 YEARS LATER, the Greeley -Milliken dump is still ih operation, GROWING LARGER EACH DAY! The landfill continues, and threatens to EXPAND, even though a large, lined and buffered facility in dry lands is located near Ault and another is planned near Ebensburg. The Greeley -Milliken landfill is UNREGU ATZD BY CURRENT STANDARDS. Be- cause it was established prior to the adoption of federal RCRA laws and prior to the adoption of current state regulations, the owners/operators have NEVER FILED AN ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS DESIGN PLAN. The landfill has not been REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH CURRENT SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL LAWS! When the landfill was begun, it was dug BELOW THE GROUNDWATER, was UNLINED, and TRASH WAS DUMPED INTO STANDING WATER, all in a major drainage area 1/2 mile from the Big Thompson River. REMEMBER, EVEN HOUSEHOLD WASTES SUCH AS PAINT CANS, SOLVENTS, CLEANERS AND GARDEN PESTICIDES CAN ENDANGER GROUND AND SURFACE WATER IF PLACED IN UNLINED DUMPS! The Greeley -Milliken dump has holding ponds on site, which collect water. It also has deep, dangerous trenches to divert groundwater and surface run-off. _ - _ - - _ CONTAMINATION FR24 HEAVY METALS is being detected in neighboring irrigation -holding lakes. The headgates of these lakes are opened, the water leaves the lakes, goes into the irrigation ditches, finds its way through gravel beds and sloughs and INTO THE BIG THOMPSON AND THEN INTO THE SOUTH PLATTE. IF THIS DUMP CONTINUES TO GO UNNOTICED, contamination of Colorado's surface and ground water will result. The state Department of Health, through its Solid and Hazardous Waste Division and the Division of Water Quality MUST BE URGED TO INVESTIGATE THE SCURCE OF THIS CONTAINATIQN! PUBLIC ATTENTION AND PUBLIC HEARINGS must focus on this facility so that it is closed and any resulting contamination is treated. • Please join COLORADANS - CONCERNED OVER WATER (CHOW) in focusing atten- tion on this serious problem. Indicate your concern by signing your name and address below. This petition will be given to the Colorado Department of Health, DEMANDING THAT THE LANDFILL COMPLY WITH CURRENT FEDERAL AND STATE Nom/ 1 Address <`�P 114 /M C �� /)s ,21 .c Qe6 5/ omit./%2o ,-2 5'! s.2-iv/a, Ja 1.44, /'c?.c /O(/ it �9,JL.'e ,%.i ,4 ctAy Ali) t a ,..1/i. n i'/ Ault and another "planned near Xeensburrg. The Greeley -Milliken landfill is UNREGULATED BY CURRENT STANDARDS. Be- cause it was established prior to the adoption of federal RCRA laws and prior to the adoption of current state regulations, the amens/operators have NEVER FILED AN ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS DESIGN PLAN. The landfill has not been REQUIRED TO SLY WITH CURRENT SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL LAWS! When the landfill was begun, it was dug BELOW THE GROUNDWATER, was UNLINED, and TRASH WAS DUMPED INTO STANDING WATER, all in a major drainage area 1/2 mile from the Big Thompson River. REMEMBER, EVEN HOUSEHOLD WASTES SUCH AS PAINT CANS, SOLVENTS, CLEANERS AND GARDEN PESTICIDES CAN ENDANGER GROUND AND SURFACE WATER IF PLACED IN UNLINED DUMPS! �l yes r.. r Way.y espy ..coy The Greeley -Milliken dime has holding ponds on site, which collect water. It also has deep, dangerous trenches to divert groundwater and surface run-off. . _ _ _ _ CONTAMINATION FROM HEAVY METALS is being detected in neighboring irrigation -holding lakes. The headgates of these lakes are opened, the water leaves the lakes, goes into the irrigation ditches, finds its way through gravel beds and sloughs and INTO THE BIG THCMPSON AND THEN INTO THE SOUTH PLATTE. IF THIS DUMP CONTINUES TO GO UNNOTICED, contamination of Colorado's surface and ground water will result. The state Departhnt of Health, through its Solid and Hazardous Waste Division and the Division of Water Quality MUST BE URGED TO INVESTIGATE THE SOURCE OF THIS CONTAMINATION! PUBLIC ATTENTION A}D PUBLIC HEARINGS must focus on this facility sc that it is closed and any resulting contamination is treated. Please join COLORADANS - CONCERNED OVER WATER (CAW) in focusing atten- tion on this serious problem. Indicate your concern by signing your name and address below. This petition will be given to the Colorado Department of Health, DEMANDING THAT THE LANDFILL COMPLY WITH CURRENT FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS. Address qairt J)ceti t L9.lt fflt71s yn 7%1 c 1 V r3: ?7.ri Ore ALou Gt(e y S7 3 U• C ma A,v4, FLC-o 111 M, CO l43i (.04//fpain N.. fTr (ollIrs) Ca ,261 atildiClYt� &fle/ev 7-`i L),,C) jc. "�" Y ([5 195/71'Pt%l,x 31``l% .J «s rtapdall h� e%c 0 q -74 q -74q w. - af-to . r (0'7,1 ire 5-JameyIco 1.Z p 9 A -14an_ Lrp 4r�6SS �o 91061 even -though a 1 e, lined and =Zen= rac.�llcy ® uiy . Ault and anothe4 planned near ICeeLsburg. The Greeley Milliken landfill is U fl :MATED BY CURRENT STANDARDS. Be- cause it was established prior to the adoption of federal RCRA laws and prior to the adoption of Current state regulations, the owners/operators have NEVER FILED AN ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS DESIGN PLAN. The landfill has not been REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH CURRENT SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL IX'S! When the landfill was begun, it was dug BELOW THE GROUNDWATER, was UNLINED, and TRASH WAS LUMPED INTO STANDING WATER, all in a major drainage area 1/2 mile from the Big Thompson River. REMEMBER, EVEN HOUSEHOID VThSTE.S SUCH AS PAINT CANS, SOLVENTS, CAS AND CARDEN PESTICIDES CAN ENDANGER GROUND AND SURFACE WATER IF PLIED IN UNLINED DUMPS! . The Greeley -Milliken dump has holding ponds on site, which collect water. It also has deep, dangerous trenches to divert groundwater and surface 'run-off. - _ — ONTAmvaaON FROM HEAVY METALS is being detected in neighboring irrigation -holding lakes. The headgates of these lakes are opened, the water leaves the lakes, goes into the irrigation ditches, finds its way through gravel !Inds and sloughs and INTO THE BIG THCMPSON AND THEN INTO THE SOUTH PLATTE. IF THIS DUMP CONTINUES TO GO UNNOTICED, contamination of Colorado's surface and ground water will result: The state Department of Health, through its Solid and Hazardous Waste Division and the Division of Water Quality MUST BE URGED TO INVESTIGATE THE SOURCE OF THIS CONTAMINATION! PUBLIC ATTENTION AND PUBLIC HEARINGS must focus on this facility so that it is closed and any resulting contamination is treated. Please join COLORADANS - CONCERNED OVER WATER (0-00W) in focusing atten- tion on this serious problem. Indicate your concern by signing your name and address below. This petition will be given to the Colorado Department of Health, DEMANDING THAT THE LANDFILL COMPLY WTIH CURRENT FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS. Name -R ..ep-! Se2tnwrI) 4 416-0/3 L&Lniyac '/A3 '-/1loR&r pb_ Address 1835 72ra,ce. -1t/ GretlryireJ'31 o2lo t X107 (2(tele/ co. Yesic;s( 50, Si, tarcetei, Co. gt\ak 9/07 It '11, 15361 hits Frye bv?ee , G, �G(d 1204 . c7o,.,C.e,,j v 9Z 25'd se. *2 &rote' Gf� /3ov 420-711- N,P _S Co / 92 � ��rc(Fors/ "Pa/.A- �P"// A-' pa' pas?/ 931061 ' THAN 1986, when a site would be in operation. T� TODAY, 21 YEARS LATER, the Greeley -Milliken dump is still in operation, GROWING LARGER EACH DAY! The landfill continues, and threatens to EXPAND, even though a large, lined and buffered facility in dry lands is located near Ault and another is planned near Yeensburg. The Greeley -Milliken landfill is UNREGULATED BY CURRENT STANDARDS. Be- cause it was established prior to the adoption of federal RCRA laws and prior to the adoption of current state regulations, the owners/operators have NEVm FILED AN ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS DESIGN PAN. The landfill has not been REQUIRED TO C MPLY WITH CURRENT SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL LAWS! When the landfill was begun, it was dug BELOW THE GROUNDWATER, was UNLINED, and TRASH WAS DUMPED INTO STANDING WATER, all in a major drainage area 1/2 mile from the Big Thompson River. REMEMBER, EVEN HCUSEHOLD WASTES SUCH AS PAINT CANS, SOLVENTS, CLEANERS AND GARDEN PESTICIDES CAN ENDANGER GRr'7ND AND SURFACE WATER IF PLACED IN UNLINED DUMPS! The Greeley Milliken dump has holding ponds on site, which collect water. It also has deep, dangerous trenches to divert groundwater and surface run-off. _ _ - - CONTAMINATION FRAM HEAVY METALS is being detected in neighboring irrigation -holding lakes. The headgates of these lakes are opened, the water leaves the lakes, goes into the irrigation ditches, finds its way through gravel beds and sloughs and INTO THE BIG THCfl'SON AND THEN INTO THE SOUTH PLATTE. IF THIS DUMP CONTINUES TO CO UNNOTICED, contamination of Colorado's surface and ground water will result. The state Department of Health, through its Solid and Hazardous Waste Division and the Division of Water Quality MUST BE URGED TO INVESTIGATE THE SOURCE OF THIS CONTAMINATION! PUBLIC ATTENTION AND PUBLIC HEARINGS must focus on this facility so that it is closed and any resulting contamination is treated. Please join COLORADANS - 'CONCERNED OVER WATER (C -000 in focusing atten- tion on this serious problem. Indicate your concern by signing your name and address below. This petition will be given to the Colorado Department of Health, DEMANDING THAT THE LANDFILL COMPLY WITH CURRENT FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS. E grben 4 (,ICs-cl 6 c f ofe Zr-'tiCv^-Em.O Ant. Pctoitc-,N, Kin me inn • )662a '&Pco 1 'tom c, a4 hin Address I 'C^ O urn. C6; i> 4$'° aeletn, Ce SO23 505 r O f r'a ll to NC_ er*i /03C6. 3} ct.1 �. r'ruP.)r/' croetcn 1, , .S 1 Colo t� Flo x•,/A/t� O414 /763 //J4 All. 4W / (ryvc//pCO F°63) Ic$1fle(°(,cam Pn1;' rc„teke,/ IQZ n t' e-)4,, t 63! 5(\ L_ i 1401., del/co E.%3, 931061 HAVE A C-CCIII! BE CONCERNED!! GREEEL*MILLIKEN LANDFILL Coloradans - Concerned Over Water (C -00W) is a group or concerned Colorado citizens who demand action by their elected representatives to protect public health and the environment. The Greeley -Milliken landfill is located in a MAJOR DRAINAGE AREA, 1/2 mile from the Big Thompson River and 1 1/2 miles fram the South Platte River where the two rivers meet at Dos Rios. IN 1971, the Evans dump had reached capacity and the Greeley -Milliken landfill was proposed. Irrn1 farmers agreed to siting of the dwip because they were promised it would be only an INTERIM DUMP, AND WOULD CLOSE NOT LATER THAN 1986, when a new site would be in operation. TODAY, 21 YEARS LATER, the Greeley -Milliken der is still in operation, CROWING LARGER EACH DAY! The landfill continues, and threatens to EXPAND, even though a lame, lined and buffered facility in dry lands is located near Ault and another is planned near KeensburYg. The Greeley -Milliken landfill is UNREGULATED BY CURRENT SrANnARZS. Be - Cause it was established prior to the adoption of federal RCRA laws and prior to the adoption of current state regulations, the owners/operators have NEVER FILED AN ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS DESIGN PLAN. The landfill has not been REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH CURRENT SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL LAWS! When the landfill was begun, it was dug BELOW THE GROUNDWATER, was !TUNED, and TRASH VAS DUMPED INTO STANDING WATER, all in a major drainage area 1/2 mile from the Big Thompson River. REMEMBER, EVEN HOUSEHOLD WASTES SUCH AS PAINT CANS, SOLVENTS, CLEANERS AND GARDEN PESTICIDES CAN ENDANGER GROUND AND SURFACE WATER IF PLACED IN UNLINED DUMPS! The Greeley- Milliken dump has holding ponds on site, which collect water. It also has deep, dangerous trenches to divert groundwater and surface run-off. _ _ coNTAMINATION FROM HEAVY METALS is being detected in neighboring irrigation -holding lakes. The headgates of these lakes are opened, the water leaves the lakes, goes into the irrigation ditches, finds its way through gravel beds and sloughs and INTO THE BIG THCHISON AND THEN INTO THE SOUTH PLATTE. IF THIS DUMP CONTINUES TO GO UNNOTICED, contamination. of Colorado's surface and ground water will result. The state Department of Health, through its Solid and Hazardous Waste Division and the Division of Water Quality MUST BE URGED TO INVESTIGATE THE SOURCE OF THIS CONTAMINATION! PUBLIC ATTENTION AND PUBLIC HEARINGS must focus on this facility so that it is closed and any resulting contamination is treated. Please join COLORADANS - CONCERNED OVER WATER (C -004) in focusing atten- tion on this serious problem. Indicate your concern by signing your name and address below. This petition will be given to the Colorado Department of Health, DEMANDING THAT THE LANDFILL coMPLY WITH CARRENT FEDERAL AND SLATE LAWS. Ea,Me Address ei9 ///,2 Fla /o verde Love /arlol 931061 . HAVE A C -COS BE CONCERNED!! GREEELE-HILLIKEN LANDFILL Coloradans - Concerned Over Water (C-c7W) is a group of concerned Colorado citizens who demand action by their elected representatives to protect public health and the environment. The Greeley -Milliken landfill is located in a MAJOR DRAMASE AREA, 1/2 mile from the Big Thompson River and 1 1/2 miles from the South Platte River where the two rivers meet at Dos Rios. IN 1971, the Evans dump had reached capacity and the Greeley -Milliken landfill was proposed. Local fans agreed to siting of the dump because they were promised it would be only an =ERB( DUMP, AND WOULD CLOSE NOT LATER THAN 1986, when a new site would be in operation. TODAY, 21 YEARS LATER, the Greeley -Milliken dump is still in operation, GROWING LARGER EACH DAY! The landfill continues, and threatens to EXPAND, even though a large, lined and buffered facility in dry lands is located near Ault and another is planned near Keensburg. The Greeley -Milliken landfill is UNREGULATED BY GUS STAND. Be- cause it was established prior to the adoption of federal RASA laws and prior to the adoption of current state regulations, the owners/operators have NEVER FILED AN ENGINEEREIG AND OPERATIONS DESIGN PLAN. The landfill has not been REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH CURRENT SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL LAWS! When the landfill was begun, it was dug BELOW THE GROUNDWATER, was UNLINED, and TRASH WAS DUMPID INTO STANDING WATER, all in a major drainage area 1/2 mile fran the Big Thompson River, REMEMBER, EVEN HOUSEHOLD WASTES SUCH AS PAINT CANS, SOLVENTS, CLEANERS AND GARDEN PESTICIDES CAN ENDANGER GROUND AND SURFACE WATER IF PLACED IN UNLINED DUMPS! The Greeley- Milliken dump has holding ponds on site, which collect water. It also has deep, dangerous trenches to divert groundwater and surface run-off. . - — — CONTAMINATION FROM HEAVY METALS is being detected in neighboring irrigation -holding lakes. The headgates of these lakes are opened, the water leaves the lakes, goes into the irrigation ditches, finds its way through gravel beds and sloughs and INTO THE BIG THOMPSON AND THEN INTO THE SOUTH PLATTE. IF THIS WNP Nfl PS TO GO UNNOTICED, contamination of Colorado's surface and ground water will result. The state Department of Health, through its Solid and Hazardous Waste Division and the Division of Water Quality MUST BE URGED TO INVESTIGATE THE SOURCE OF THIS CJNTP.MTTION! PUBLIC ATTENTION AND PUBLIC HEARINGS must focus an this facility so that it is closed and any resulting contamination is treated. Plnage join COLORADANS - CONCERNED OVER WATER (CHOW) in focusing atten- tion on this serious problem. indicate your concern by signing your name and address below. This petition will be given to the Colorado Department of Health, DEMANDING THAT THE LANDFILL COMPLY WITH =REIT FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS. Name Address ?r /'AC / ce Je.1 co S✓'oco5/ /67 // (�.. viCimleti4i 266 C/a /1t + lr ire (72 t63/ 921061 Ault and another i lanned near Yeensburg. The Greeley —liken landfill is URRDMLATED BY GURRENT'STAND,ARDS. Be- cause it was established prior to the adoption of federal RCRA laws and prior to the adoption of current state regulations, the owners/operators have NEVER FILED AN ENGINEER: G AND OPERATIONS DESIGN PLAN. The landfill has not been REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH CURRENT SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL LAWS! When the landfill was begun, it was dug BELOW THE GROUNDWATER, was UNLINED, and TRASH WAS DUMPED INTO STANDING WATER, all in a major drainage area 1/2 mile from the Big Thomason River. REMEMBER, EVEN HOUSEHOLD WASTES SUCH AS PAINT CANS, SOLVENTS, CLEANERS AND GARDEN PESTICIDES CAN ENDANGER GROUND AND SURFACE WATER IF PLACED IN UNLINED DUMPS! The Greeley -Milliken dump has holding ponds on site, which collect water. It also has deep, dangerous trenches to divert grourrh,ater and surface run-off. . - _ _ CONTAMINATION FRoM HEAVY METALS is being detected in. neighboring irrigation -holding lakes. The headgates of these lakes are opened, the water leaves the lakes, goes into the irrigation ditches, finis its way through gravel beds and sloughs and INTO THE BIG THOMPSON AND THEN INTO THE SOUTH PLATTE. IF THIS DUMP CONTL'v'U'.S TO GO UNNOTICED, contamination of Colorado's surface and ground water will result. The state Depar'btnt of Health, through its Solid and Hazardous Waste Division and the Division of Water Quality MUST BE URGED TO INVESTIGATE THE SOILRCE OF THIS CONTAMINATION! PUBLIC ATTENTION AND PUBLIC HEARINGS must focus on this facility so that it is closed and any resulting contamination is treated. Please join COLORADANS - CONCERNED OVER WATER (C -COW) in focusing atten- tion on this serious problem. Indicate your concern by signing your name and address below. This petition will be given to the Colorado Department of Health, DEMANDING THAT THE LANDFILI. COMPLY WITH CURRENT FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS. /),, x.11 l I l:I' ititzAFh$t .5 -clips etc Oa n i rft is - tal c, "C«. ,, CLaR.K SiVge r� ?' 4,( I CiG DUcA 'in c..4, ¢ ( Addkess LR cvRE.✓So... 8/4 IAY AV Crdir. tn,i.r. 5nAv ≤t y, . ci.(\j1"-(R, 411 / BOO //IA 4 #207 2)qa 'H.\ St. Gz7y MI. Vag). 1Svc S-0.- 3553 ivt% j #311 931061 Ault and another isanned near Xeensburg. • The Greeley -Milliken landfill is UNREGULATED BY CURRENT STANDARD. Be- cause it was established prior to the adoption of federal RCRA laws and prior to the adoption of current state regulations, the owners/operators have NEVER FILED AN ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS DESIGN PLAN. The landfill has not been REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH CURRENT SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL LANS! When the landfill was begun, it was dug APTcw THE GROUNDKATER, was UNLINED, and TRASH WAS DUMPED INTO STANDING WATER, all in a major drainage area 1/2 mile from the Big Thompson River. REMEMBER, EVEN HOUSE1OLb WASTES SUCH AS PAINT CANS, SOLVENT'S, CLEANERS AND GARDEN PESTICIDES CAN ENDANGER GROUND AND SURFACE WATER IF PLACED IN UNLINED DUMPS! The Greeley -Milliken dump has holding ponds on site, which collect water. It also has deep, dangerous trenches to divert groundwater and surface run-off. . - _ - - chTAu:N=0N FROM B AvY Kerns is being detected in neighboring irrigation -holding lakes. The headgates of these lakes are opened, the water leaves the lakes, goes into the irrigation ditches, finds its way through gravel beds and sloughs and INTO THE BIG THOPSSON AND THEN INTO THE SOUTH PLATTE. IF THIS DUMP CONTINUES TO GO UNNOTICED, contamination of Colorado's surface and ground water will result. The state Department of Health, through its Solid and Hazardous Waste Division and the Division of Water Quality MUST BE URGED TO INVESTIGATE THE SCURCE OF THIS CONTAYSN TION! PUBLIC ATTENTION AND PUBLIC HEARINGS must foals on this facility so that it is closed and any resulting contamination is treated. Please join COLORADANS - CONCERNED OVER WATrIt (CAW) in focusing atten- tion on this serious problem. Indicate your concern by signing your name and address below. This petition will be given to the Colorado Department of Health, DEMANDING THAT THE LANDFILL OILY WITH CURRENT FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS. thvag h.aur-ol s cpn fitte *R ; n c, L;ra Lti{ 1\ Address act ,?((r , l r? \` Ush p 3 v�J Ho 7) .a.Airen,scn 750121vy/4.Sa l 19ram t e-iaU an. G tE\co ta,3) 01 Do .ant CDSciO3( /rtiU n � 2. q- a Co ‘2 7 Spuhr 5t. / gat Z/az at/{ co P'&2/ 117s- 23t NJE4(o Grew c' CO occ.'3/ 921061 even'though a large lined and buffered facility iniiiy lands is lace near Ault and another ilipianned near Feensburg. The Greeley -Milliken landfill is UNREOUTAXED BY CURRENT STANDARDS. Be- cause it was established prior to the adoption of federal RCRA laws and prior to the adoption of current state regulations, the vmers/operators have NEVER FILED AN ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS DESIGN PLAN. The landfill has not been REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH CURRF)tT SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL LAWS! When the landfill was begun, it was dug BELOW THE GROUNTJ'&TER, was UNLINED, and TRASH WAS DUMPED INTO STANDING WATER, all in a major drainage area 1/2 mile fran the Big Thompson River. REMEMBER, EVEN HOUSEHOLD wiSITS SUCH AS PAINT CANS, SOLVENTS, CLEANERS AND GARDEN PESTICIDES CAN ENDANGERGROUND AND SURFACE WATER IF PLACE IN UNiz= DUMPS! The Greeley -Milliken durrp has holding ponds on site, which collect water. It also has deep, dangerous trenches to divert groundwater and surface run-off. - - - CONTAMINATION FROM HEAVY METALS is being detected in neighboring irrigation -holding lakes. The headgates of these lakes are opened, the water leaves the lakes, goes into the irrigation ditches, finds its way through gravel beds and sloughs and INTO THE BIG THODPSCN AND THEN INTO THE SOUTH PLATTE. IF THIS DUMP CONTINUES TO GO UNNOTICED, contamination of Colorado's surface and ground water will result. The state Department of Health, through its Solid and Hazardous Waste Division and the Division of Water Quality MUST BE URGED TO INVESTIGATE THE SOURCE CF TEES CxONTAMO=0N1 PUBLIC ATTENTION AND PUBLIC HEARINGS rust focus on this facility so that it is closed and any resulting contamination is treated. Plea' join COLORADANS - CONCERNED OVER WATER (C47W) in focusing atten- tion on this serious problem. Indicate your concern by signing your name and address below. This petition will be given to the Colorado Department of Health, DEMANDING THAT THE LANDFILL COMPLY WITH CURRENT FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS. Name , Address IR 0 q 19-k 5(,. 6i (-, Cr f a 4 2c(40elE%Gri /;' / D u,r/n nc/ 0'76,7 74•..,1� r �Y169C, (sic, R s tie 0. & L. S. /se, _ gek24 £4. /2Evth/ 931061 Ault and another is *Hoed near Xeensburrg. i The Greeley -Milliken landfill is UNREGULATED BY CURRENT STANDARDS. Be- cause it was established prior to the adoption of federal RCRA laws and prior to the adoption of current state regulations, the owners/operators have NEVER FILED AN ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS DESIGN PLAN. The landfill has not been REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH CURRENT SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL LAWS! When the landfill was begun, it was dug BELOW THE GROUNDWATER, was UNLmED, and TRASH WAS WMPPD INTO STANDING WATER, all in a major drainage area 1/2 mile from the Big Thompson River. REMEMBER, EVEN HOUSEHOLD WASTES SUCH AS PALO CANS, SOLVENTS, CLEANERS AND GARDEN PESTICIDES CAN ENDANGER GROUND AND SURFACE WATER IF PLACED IN UNLINED LUMPS! The Greeley Milliken dump has holding ponds on site, which collect water. It also has deep, dangerous trenches to divert groundwater and surface ' run-off. _ .. CONTAMINATION ECM HEAVY VEMAIS is being detected in neighboring irrigation -holding lakes. The headgates of these lakes are opened, the water leaves the lakes, goes into the irrigation ditches, finds its way through gravel beds and sloughs and INTO THE BIG THOMPSON AND THEN INTO THE SCUM PLATTE. IF THIS DUMP CONI'IIVUFS TO GO UNNOTICED, contamination of Colorado's surface and ground water will result. The state Department of Health, through its Solid and Hazardous Waste Division and the Division of Water Quality MUST BE URGED TO INVESTIGATE THE SOURCE OF THIS CONTAMINATION! PUBLIC ATTENTION AND PUBLIC HEARINGS must focus on this facility so that it is closed and any resulting contamination is treated. Please join COLORADIANS - CONCERNED OVER WATER (C.-074) in focusing atten- tion on this serious problem. Indicate your concern by signing your name and address below. This petition will be given to the Colorado Department of Health, Dfl NDING THAT THE LANDFILL COMPLY WITH CURRENT FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS. &MO p AZEge 111. 1)0,uA7b Address t �'.a 1/4.* n .t LLAN. 052.9 03\ auk -5i .� c.�t.1-Pin (;),c\. t 2 �Q� FCC -Z1 (rator CXO,I (! (7-/P,o1riciV i%(1tO( Cif P-30 Ft- 6177 (1) gol4 ) 043 I fins y 7/0 /$ /X / OP*0 �, ,t l3/ 37 Ply r3ry /177 Arcof G- &t'32 931061 even though a large lined and buffered facility in lands is located near Ault and another isillanned near Xee.nsburg. The Greeley -Milliken landfill is UNREGUTATED BY CURRENT STANDARDS. Be- cause it was established prior to the adoption of federal RCRA laws and prior to the adoption of current state regulations, the owners/operators have NEVER FILED AN ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS DESIGN PLAN. The landfill has not been REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH CURRENT SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL LAWS! When the landfill was begun, it was dug BELOW THE GRCUN wATER, was VNLa1ED, and TRASH WAS DUMPED INN STANDING WATER, all in a major drainage area 1/2 mile from the Big ThompsonRiver. REMEMBER, EVEN HOUSIIiOLA WASTES SUCH AS PAINT CANS, SOLVENTS, CLEANERS AND GARDEN PESTICIDES CAN ENDANGER GROUND AND SURFACE WATER IF PLACED IN UNL219ED DUMPS! The Greeley -Milliken dump has holding ponds on site, which collect water. It also has deep, dangerous trenches to divert groundwater and surface 'run-off. _ — CONTAMINATION FROM HEAVY METALS is being detected in neighboring irrigation -holding lakes. The headgates of these lakes are opened, the water leaves the lakes, goes into the irrigation ditches, finds its way through gravel beds and sloughs and INTO THE BIG THCMPSCN AND TEEN INTO THE SOUTH PLATTE. IF THIS DUMP CONTINUES TO GO UNNOTICED, contamination of Colorado's surface and ground water will result. The state Department of Health, through its Solid and Hazardous Waste Division and the Division of Water Quality MUST BE URGED TO INVESTIGATE THE SOURCE OF THIS CONTAMINATION! PUBLIC ATTENTION AND PUBLIC HEARINGS must focus on this facility so that it is closed and any resulting contamination is treated. Please join COLORADANS - CONCERNED OVER WATER (C-004) in focusing atten- tion on this serious problem. Indicate your concern by signing your name and address below. This petition will be given to the Colorado Department of Health, DEMANDING THAT THE LANDFILL COMPLY WITH CURRENT FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS. Name A -- "ley, &ID_ a)co a4co Y=- .- .L3n.S ,37G, ~ � g0 1 123+. � , o' Gdze,, Yed pecr&S..‘on ss ' 12kt - & X tt 921061 HAVE A C -COW! !OE CONCERNED!! GREEELEY-+,LIKEN LANDFILL Coloradans - Concerned Over Water (C -COW) is a group of concerned Colorado citizens who demand action by their elected representatives to protect public health and the environment. The Greeley -Milliken landfill is located in a MAJOR DRAINAGE AREA, 1/2 mile from the Big Thompson River and 1 1/2 miles from the South Platte River where the two rivers meet at Dos Rios. IN 1971, the Evans dump had reached capacity and the Greeley -Milliken landfill was proposed. Local farmers agreed to siting of the dump because they were promised it would be only an INTERIM DUMP, AND WOULD CLOSE NOT LATER THAN 1986, when.a new site would.be in operation. TODAY, 21 YEARS LATER, the Greeley -Milliken dump is still in operation, GROWING LARGER EACti DAY! The landfill continues, and threatens to EXPAND, even though a large, lined and buffered facility in dry lands is located near Ault and another is planned near Xeensburq. The Greeley -Milliken landfill is UNREGULATED BY CURRENT STANDARDS. Be- cause it was established prior to the adoption of federal RCRA laws and prior to the adoption of current state regulations, the owners/operators have NEVER FILED AN ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS DESIGN PLAN. The landfill has not been REQUIRED It) COMPLY WITH CURRENt SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL LAWS! When the landfill was begun, it was dug BELOW THE GROUNE ATER, was UNLINED, and TRASH WAS DUMPED INTO STANDING WATER, all in a major drainage area 1/2 mile from the Big Thompson River. RUIN R, EVEN HOUSE -[OLD WASTES SUCH AS PAINT CANS, SOLVENTS, CLEANERS AND GARDEN PESTICIDES CAN ENDANGER GROUND AND SURFACE WATER IF PLACED IN UNLINED DUMPS! The Greeley -Milliken dump has holding ponds on site, which collect water. It also has deep, dangerous trenches to divert groundwater and surface run-off. . _ CONTAMINATION FROM HEAVY METALS is being detected in neighboring irrigation -holding lakes. The headgates of these lakes are opened, the water leaves the lakes, goes into the irrigation ditches, finds its way through gravel beds and sloughs and INTO THE BIG ¶IHCMPS0N AND THEN INTO THE SOUTH PLATTE. IF THIS DUMP CONTINUES TO GO UNNOTICED, contamination of Colorado's surface and ground water will result. The state Department of Health, through its Solid and Hazardous Waste Division and the Division of Water Quality MUST BE URGED TO INJFSTIGATE THE SOURCE OF THIS CONTAMINATION! F.IBLIC ATTENTION AND PUBLIC HEARINGS must focus on this facility so that it is closed and any resulting contamination is treated. Please join COLORADANS - CONCERNED OVER WATER (C -COW) in focusing atten- tion on this serious problem. Indicate your concern by signing your name and address below. This petition will be given to the Colorado Department of Health, DEMANDING THAT THE LANDFILL COMPLY WITH FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS. E S 4:744 LaAn C. /_/442-e/if l mss 3' 8S _A /e di! at- 7e237 L/!,/93 Sn L(///�/D1_c1 , I LO%8a.2-t. 37 cfAoi �iJr/ dl 1r_kr W4917;7/7c f, 5` / 27em,ve,r- $ozo7 ('a go ?o7 53.2. Cale/n(. .gcC4- ZO(. /175/ S, osa C()�on w�a 100/7 ¢� S0.I ' ,; Zb 07 / i sTJ S. 74-4-- Yet., Peter - 11 931061 Ault and another isginned near Iteensburg The Greeley -Milliken landfill is UNREGULATED BY CURRENT STANDARDS. Be- cause it was established prior to the adoption of federal RCRA laws and prior to the adoption of current state regulations, the owners/operators have NEVER FILED AN ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS DESIGN PLAN. The landfill has not been REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH CURRENT SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL LAWS! When the landfill was begun, it was dug BELOW THE GROUNDWATER, was UNLINED, and TRASH WAS LOWED INTO STANDING WATER, all in a major drainage area 1/2 mile from the Big Thompson River. REMEMBER, EVEN HCUSEBOLD WASTES SUCH AS PAINT CANS, SOLVENTS, CLEANERS AND GARDEN PESTICIDES CAN ENDANGER GROUND AND SURFACE WATER IF PLACID IN UNLICD DUMPS! The Greeley -Milliken dwnp has holding ponds on site, which collect water. It also has deep, dangerous trenches to divert groundwater and surface run-off. _ _ .... _ .`CONTAMINATION FRCP! HEAVY METALS is being detected in neighboring irrigation -holding lakes. The headgates of these lakes are opened, the water leaves the lakes, goes into the irrigation ditches, finds its way through gravel beds and sloughs and INTD THE BIG T C1' 'SON AND THIN INTO THE SOUTH PLATTE. IF THIS DUMP CONTINUES TO GO UNNOTICED, contamination of Colorado's surface and ground water will result. The state Department of Health, through its Solid and Hazardous Waste Division and the Division of Water Quality MUST BE URGED TO INVESTIGATE THE SOURCE OF THIS CONTAMINATION! FUBLiC ATTENTION AND PUBLIC HEARINGS exist focus on this facility so that it is closed and any resulting contamination is treated. Please join CIOLOR NS - CONCERNED OVER WATER (C-CtS) in focusing atten- tion on this serious problem. Indicate your concern by signing your name and address below. This petition will be given to the Colorado Department of Health, DEMANDING THAT THE LANDFILL COMPLY WITH CURRENT FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS. cPia ,Zeo<slecildet./j >62 /7 fild,e4- Address /,,?5Y4 F f 6 69)d/7 27G. -T . 41.z.094657:(a/;-, k421-2/ Iwo Gn .S, P 4tRA /-lay COSV33) i� J (%4,,,,aAyc..it 4Lvr..goo/ei 4097c iattn-ft -g Anecolw/71 yam/ s SgyratM .71f 4ac,Go '3 Bann F it IFF4vF a7. P sopa( a) 073 tdu 2nCla \ jic 931061 Ault and another i*anned near Reenstcrg. The Greeley -Milliken landfill is UNREGULATED BY CURRENT STANDARDS. Be- cause it was established prior to the adoption of federal RCRA laws and prior to the adoption of current state regulations, the owners/operators have NEVER FILED AN ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS DESIGN PLAN. The landfill has not been REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH CURRENT SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL LAWS! When the landfill was begun, it was dug BELOW THE GROUNDWATER, was UNLINED, and TRASH FIRS DUMPED INTO STANDING EATER, all in a major drainage area 1/2 mile fran the Big Thompson River. REMEMBER, EVEN HOUSEHOLDWASTES SUCH AS PAINT CANS, SOLVENTS, CLEANERS AND GARDEN PESTICIDES CAN ENDANGER GROUND AND SURFACE WATER IF PLACED IN UNLINED DUMPS! The Greeley -Milliken dui has holding ponds on site, which collect water. It also has deep, dangerous trenches to divert groundwater and surface run-off. _ _ - CONTAMDVATION FROM HEAVY METALS is being detected in neighboring -irrigation -holding lakes. The headgates of these lakes are opened, the water leaves the lakes, goes into the irrigation ditches, finds its way through gravel beds and sloughs and INTO THE BIG THOMPSON AND THEN INTO THE SOUTH PLATTE. IF THIS DUMP CONTINUES TO GO UNNOTICED, contamination of Colorado's surface and ground water will result. The state Department of Health, through its Solid and Hazardous Waste Division and the Division of Water Quality MUST BE URGED TO INVESTIGATE THE SOURCE OF THIS CONTAMINATION! PUBLIC ATTENTION AND PUBLIC HEARINGS must focus on this facility so that it is closed and any resulting contamination is treated. Plra a join COLOPADANS - CONCERNED OVER WATER (C-ODW) in focusing atten- tion on this serious problem. Indicate your concern by signing your name and address below. This petition will be given to the Colorado Department of Health, DEMANDING THAT THE LANDFILL COMPLY WITH CURRENT FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS. Nam@ ,-h C Address -5-4// a- '&( ;w 57- ,/^.c4, 7k S- //4 /tJ/n sr i2o3 , 6 923 A-2 7'1 c .342.2 1-� o releg t 7 — - en o-ty- 2 4.69 Cittrz/t7 4 Pj_ C-gz3So Imo&&ay..gym °N& 931061 Aril. even though a large, Ault and another is sue • n' • 111 cx?nt 7AIPS, dna tareatenS to L' 7U'.AtW, and buffered facility in 14,1ands is located near near Fsensbu ii. The Greeley -Milliken landfill is UNREGULATED BY CURRENT STANDARDS. Be- cause it was established prior to the adoption of federal RCRA laws and prior to the adoption of current state regulations, the cranes/operators have NEVER FILED AN ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS DESIGN PLAN. The landfill has not been REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH CURRENT SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL LAWS! When the landfill was begun, it was dug BELOW THE GROUNDWATER, was UNLINED, and TRASH WAS DUMPED INTO STANDING WATER, all in a major drainage area 1/2 mile from the Big Thompson River. REAR, EVEN HOUSEHOLD WASTES SUCH AS PAINT CANS, SOLVENTS, CLEANERS AND GARDEN •a. CIIDES CANENDANGER AND SURFACE WATER IF PLACED 1N UNLINED DUMPS! The Greeley -Milliken dump has holding ponds on site, which collect water. It also has deep, dangerous trenches to divert groundwater and surface run-off. - - -,-CONTAMINATION FROM HEAVY METALS is being detected in neighboring irrigation -holding lakes. The headgates of these lakes are opened, the water leaves the lakes, goes into the irrigation ditches, finds its way through gravel !w3c and sloughs and INTO THE BIG THOMPSON AND THEN INTO THE SOUTH PLATTE. IF THIS DUMP CONTINUES TO GO UNNOTICED, contamination of Colorado's surface and ground water'will result. The state Department of Health, through its Solid and Hazardous Waste Division and the Division of Water Quality MUST BE URGED TO INVESTIGATE THE SOURCE OF THIS CONTAMINATION! PUBLIC ATTENTION AND PUBLIC HEAR N= must focus on this facility so that it is closed and any resulting contamination is treated. p1PaaP join COLORADANS - CONCERNED OVER WATER (C -COW) in focusing atten- tion on this serious problem. Indicate your concern by signing your name and address below. This petition will be given to the Colorado Department of Health, DEMANDING THAT THE LANDFILL COMPLY WITH CURRENT FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS. <c1CC .dAl -et Address l\\ \,\ CC S E PI M:Le/ (a /6' L�rAve. ID/7G1e•T /IA ;7 .; r.-< re? ✓ I� 'ken / o / �/!e .7P- ( 4 ri , Ft<e fob fl;Ireker Cri ;ll.Pev,/CI 931061 HAVE A C -COO BE CONCERNED!! GREEELE-MILLIKEN LANDFILL Coloradans - Concerned Over Water (C-OOW) is a group of concerned Colorado citizens who demand action by their elected representatives to protect public health and the environment. The Greeley -Milliken landfill is located in a MAJOR DRAINAGE AREA, 1/2 mile from the Big Thompson River and 1 1/2 miles from the South Platte River where the two rivers meet at Dos Rios. IN 1971, the Evans dump had reached capacity and the Greeley -Milliken landfill was proposed. 7oral fanners agreed to siting of the dtmp because they were promised it would be only an INTERIM DUMP, AND WOULD CLOSE NOT LATER THAN 1986, when a new site would be in operation. TODAY, 21 YEARS LATER, the Greeley -Milliken dump is still in operation, GROWING LARGER EACH DAY! The landfill continues, and threatens to EXPAND, even though a large, lined and buffered facility in dry lands is located near Ault and another is planned near Reensburg. The Greeley -Milliken landfill is UNREGULATED BY CURRENT STANTARTG. Be- cause it was established prior to the adoption of federal RCRA laws and prior • to the adoption of current state regulations, the owners/operators have NEVER FILED AN ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS DESIGN PLAN. The landfill has not been REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH CURRENT SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL LAWS! When the landfill was begun, it was dug BELOW THE GROUNDWATER, was UNLINED, and TRASH WAS DUMPED INTO STANDING WATER, all in a major drainage area 1/2 mile from the Big Thompson River. REMEMBER, EVEN HOUSEHOLD WASTES SUCH AS PAINT CANS, SOLVENTS, CLEANERS AND GARDEN PESTICIDES CAN ENDANGER GROUND AND SURFACE WATER IF PLACID IN UNLINED DUMPS! The Greeley -Milliken dump has holding ponds on site, which collect water. It also has deep, dangerous trenches to divert groundwater and surface run-off. . _ _ CONTAMINA'T'ION FROM HEAVY METALS is being detected in neighboring irrigation -holding lakes. The headgates of these lakes are opened, the water leaves the lakes, goes into the irrigation ditches, fits its way through gravel beds and sloughs and INTO THE BIG THCtIPSON AND THEN INTO THE SOUTH PLATTE. IF THIS DUMP CONTINUES TO GO UNNOTICED, contamination of Colorado's surface and ground water will result. The state Department of Health, through its Solid and Hazardous Waste Division and the Division of Watar Quality WET .P..r 7:ct.,.rn TO T' rgTYrnTc 'Y'4TF" SOURCE OF THIS CUDTTTION! PUBLIC ATTENTION AND PUBLIC HEARINGS must focus on this facility so that it is closed and any resulting contamination is treated. Please join CDLORADANS - CONCERN= OVER WATER (COQ) in focusing atten- tion on this serious problem. Indicate your concern by signing your name and address below. This petition will be given to the Colorado Department of Health, DEMANDING THAT THE LANDFILL COMPLY WITH CURRENT FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS. Name Address rk,keiie UStUs Mich; ll.n 4l?/x-73 1211 Ks /kr' hh a 4535 'O 17 CRFEk- Tcf Co/o5p and IDrrnr weco 1 a rin 933 ErnErn^ 4vc Giv_^p/ co. /99a 97i/7 Ate of iTd Y, Co . -a13. in& ,. Cpl 790)(-3/ lsbn Due .3d !So% R"''4ue . 99 fo /A N IC Ga 1G it` ; # 1 g2«,cam/(O 5Y1,_ E )orP I -; lee 3t \ : 'Ca33 921061 Ault and another Illipanned near Keensbuzg. ^ a The Greeley -Milliken landfill is UNREGULATED BY CURRENT STANDARDS. Be- cause it was established prior to the adoption of federal RCRA laws and prior to the adoption of current state regulations, the owners/operators have NEVER FILED AN EIGINEERTNG AND OPERATIONS DESIGN PLAN. The landfill has not been REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH CURRENT SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL LAWS! When the landfill was begun, it was dug BELAW THE GROUNCWATER, was UNITED, and TRASH WAS DUMPED INTO STANDING WATER, all in a major drainage area 1/2 mile from the Big Thompson River. &ZEE ER, EVEN HOUSEHOLD WASTES SUGI AS PAINT CANS, SOLVENTS, CLEANERS AND GARDEN PESTICIDES CAN ENDANGER GROUND AND SURFACE WATER IF PLACED IN UNLTNED.DUMPS! The Greeley Milliken dump has holding ponds on site, which collect water. It also has deep, dangerous trenches to divert groundwater and surface run-off. . _ _ _ CONTAMINATION FROM HEAVY METALS is being detected in neighboring -irrigation -holding lakes. The headgates of these lakes are opened, the water leaves the lakes, goes into the irrigation ditches, finds its way through gravel bps and sloughs and INTO THE BIG T O SON AND THEN INTO THE SOUTH PLATTE. IF THIS DUMP CONTINUES TO GO UNNOTICED, contamination of Colorado's surface and ground water will result. The state Deparh��t of Health, through its Solid and Hazardous Waste Division and the Division of Water Quality MUST BE URGED TO INVESTIGATE THE SOURCE OF THIS CONTAMINATION! PUBLIC ATTENTION AND PUBLIC HEARINGS must focus on this facility so that it is closed and any resulting contamination is treated. P1PtsP join COLORADANS - CONCERNED OVER WATER (C -COW) in focusing atten- tion on this serious problem. Indicate your concern by signing your name and address below. This petition will be given to the Colorado Department of Health, DEMANDING THAT THE LANDFILL COMPLY WITH CURRENT FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS. NAme oig JEFF 4 vr� Lai ehence. C 9• itio o e? ctel\e:_t r /20/. i . ., (l Iaie iLLalten? v5 Address /lo/ fir-f,4ve C" fe.-E f r'O 1(1/ 1/14456.% tin eaciiCyoFe,SZ1 2703 .yc.Tdcw 4^=0 h•-• tfri C nrci Crtk n !4'nlla-7D(e) C-Jrrelr j 0 1 /lam. (ofAintifece /_c;.(43 fen.cnn 1tc..1\, SF (^recd% Co 806.31 r,JiL-y0 J /48 6e az.e/ PO fkA 1;)) CA. Caste &tK.L 1/1 90/d2# Leebfo/ 931061 TODAY, 21 YEARS LATER, the Greeley -Milliken dunp is still in operation, CROWING LARGER EACH DAY! The landfill continues, and threatens to SAND, even though a large, lined and buffered facility in dry lands is located near Ault and another is planned near Keansburg. M1 The Greeley -Milliken landfill is UNREGULATED BY CURRENT 'STANDARDS. Be- cause it was established prior to the adoption of federal. RCRA laws and prior to the adoption of current state regulations, the owners/operators have NEVER FILED AN ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS DESIGN PLAN. The landfill has not been REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH CURRENT SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL LAWS! When the landfill was begun, it was dug BELOW THE GROUNDWATER, was UNLINED, and TRASH WAS DUMPED INTO STANDING WATER, all in a major drainage area 1/2 mile fran the Big Thomson River. R}1D1HER, EVEN HWSEHOID WASTES SUCH AS PAIWP CANS, SOLVENTS, CSFANFRS AND GARDEN PESTICIDES CAN ENDANGER CRouND AND SURFACE WATER IF PLACID IN UNLINED DUMPS! The Greeley -Milliken dump has holding ponds on site, which collect water. It also has deep, dangerous trenches to divert groundwater and surface run-off. _ — CONTAMINATION FROM HEAVY METALS is being detected in neighboringirrigation-holdinglakes. The headgates of these lakes are opened, the water leaves the lakes, goes into the irrigation ditches, finds its way through gravel beds and sloughs and INTO THE BIG 2HCI .'SON AND THEN INTO THE SOUTH PLATTE. IF THIS DUMP CONTINUES TO GO UNNOTICED, contamination of Colorado's surface and groundwater will result. The state Department of Health, through its Solid and Hazardous Waste Division and the Division of Water Quality MUST BE URGED TO INVESTIGATE THE SOURCE OF THIS C10NTA?OTh Ia!! PUBLIC ATTENTION AND PUBLIC HEARINGS Haut focus on this facility so that it is closed and any resulting contamination is treated. Ale q s join C OLDRAE INS - CONCERNED OVER WATER (C-0OW) in focusing atten- tion on this serious problem. Indicate your concern by signing your name and address below. This petition will be given to the Colorado Department of Health, DEMANDING THAT THE LANDFILL COMPLY WITH CURRENT FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS. Name iIAP f112 Awl) // Address ��oo j, i3 ;573' Cda extz-4--)&/JaI2 c3) <7"'/ - 1�1c�- c., :y<cca CC fa63' h-(9; 1,14 61 C3r azi- << t3 � abc. cAyipPfiy,h � ) ,-1/4, 772c( (1�G'9°C` It 2 f(mccry 6&Ccy 2'G6: &a:7 �-wah>3 / VD ^Dt.tcG[�4%�/ � � Mai 931.061 even though a large, lined and buffered facility in dry lands is located near Ault and another is planned near Ebensburg. The Greeley -Milliken landfill is UNREGULATED BY CURRENT STANDARDS. Be- cause it was established prior to the adoption of federal RCRA laws and prior to the adoption of current state regulations, the owners/operators have NEVER FILED AN ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS DESIGN PLAN. The landfill has not been REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH CURRENT SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL LAWS! When the landfill was begun, it was dug BELOW THE GROUNDWATER, was UNLINED, and TRASH WAS LUMPED INTO STANDING WATER, all in a major drainage area 1/2 mile from the Big Thompson River. REMEMBER, EVEN HOUSEHOLD WASTES SUCH AS PAINT CANS, SOLVENTS, CLEANERS AND GARDEN PESTICIDES CAN ENDANGER GROUND AND SURFACE WATER IF PLACED IN UNLINED DUMPS! The Greeley -Milliken dump has holding ponds on site, which collect water. It also has deep, dangerous trenches to divert groundwater and surface run-off. - - - CONTAMINATION FROM HEAVY METALS is being detected in neighboring -irrigation -holding lakes. The headgates of these lakes are opened, the water leaves the lakes, goes into the irrigation ditches, finds its way through gravel 1 -Pas and sloughs and INTO THE BIG THOrP'SON AND THEN INTO THE SOUTH PLATTE. IF THIS DUMP CONTINUES TO GO UNNOTICED, contamination of Colorado's surface and ground water will result. The state Department of Health, through its Solid and Hazardous Waste Division and the Division of Water Quality MUST BE URGED TO INVESTIGATE THE SOURCE OF THIS CONTAMINATION! PUBLIC ATTENTION AND PUBLIC HEARINGS must focus on this facility so that it is closed and any resulting contamination is treated. Please join COLORADANS - CDNCERNED OVER WATER (C -00W) in focusing atten- tion on this serious problem. Indicate your concern by signing your name and address below. This petition will be given to the Colorado Department of Health, DEMANDING THAT THE LANDFILL COMPLY WITH CURRENT FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS. Name Pddress A l 1 ."kK'1ffry c2 Aed fit, ,,23 2 '• 5, 7C-34)AU,�. - 2, JAI /7,.)_37 tn5 ( y L iPL .L;/- 1.0y57 -/Alike 3 D3o 2c7.< Y4 t. /2/ PC, S5c/ 4",,trcLCL 7//r r re,,e,,")e raX'. 1,,20 73r 5 d. 15041,te a :A/61(445,6 8GUc .5/hb 931O61.' HAVE A C-COW!CONCERNED!! GREEELEY-,LIKEN LANDFILL Coloradans - Concerned Over Water (C -COW) is a group of concerned Colorado citizens who demand action by their elected representatives to protect public health and the environment. The Greeley -Milliken landfill is located in a MAJOR DRAINAGE AREA, 1/2 mile from the Big Thompson River and 1 1/2 miles from the South Platte River where the two rivers meet at Dos Rios. IN 1971, the Evans dump had reached capacity and the Greeley -Milliken landfill was proposed. Local farmers agreed to siting of the damp because they were promised it would be only an INTERIM DUMP, AND WOULD CLOSE NOT LATER MAN 1986, when a new site would. be in operation. TODAY, 21 YEARS LAYER, the Greeley -Milliken dump is still in operation, GROWING LARGER EACH DAY! The landfill continues, and threatens to EXPAND, even though a large, lined and buffered facility in dry lands is located near Ault and another is planned near Keensburg. The Greeley -Milliken landfill is UNREGULATED By CURRENT STANDARD. Be- cause it was established prior to the adoption of federal RCRA laws and prior to the adoption of current state regulations, the owners/operators have NEVER FILED AN ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS DESIGN PLAN. The landfill has not been REQUIRED TO OOMPLY WITH CURRENT SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL LAWS! When the landfill was begun, it was dug BELOW THE GROUNLMATTR, was UNLINED, and TRASH WAS DUMPED INTO STANDING WATER, all in a major drainage area 1/2 mile tram the Big Thompson River. REMEMBER, EVEN HOUSEHOLD WASTES SUCH AS PAINT CANS, SOLVENTS, CLEANERS AND GARDEN PESTICIDES CAN ENDANGER GRCUND AND SURFACE WATER IF PLACED IN UNLINED DUMPS! The Greeley -Milliken dump has holding ponds on site, which collect water. It also has deep, dangerous trenches to divert groundwater and surface run-off. . _ WNTA&L}U+TION FROM HEAVY METALS is being detected in neighboringirrigation-holdinglakes. The headgates of these lakes are opened, the water leaves the lakes, goes into the irrigation ditches, finds its way through gravel beds and sloughs and INTO THE BIG TNCMPSON AND THEN INTO THE SOUTH PLATTE. IF THIS DUMP CONTINUES TO GO UNNOTICED, contamination of Colorado's surface and ground water will result. The state Department of Health, through its Solid and Hazardous Waste Division and the Division of Water Quality MUST BE URGED TO INVESTIGATE Alit; SOURCE OF THIS CONi'APamal0Ni PUBLIC ATTENTION AND PUBLIC HEARINGS must focus on this facility so that it is closed and any resulting contamination is treated. Please join COLORADANS - CONCERNED OVER WATER (C -COW) in focusing atten- tion on this serious problem. Indicate your concern by signing your name aid address below. This petition will be given to the Colorado Department of Health, DEMANDING 'MAT THE LANDFILL COMPLY WITH CURRENT FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS. tate Address s •G note Yd 20s„ y l of Zugaru , rc./ l �r lro �n or aid vwe.c `O 2.10 931061 Ault and another iliplanned near xeensburg. • The Greeley -Milliken landfill is UNREGULATED BY CURRENTSTANEARES. Be- cause it was established prior to the adoption of federal RCRA laws and prior to the adoption of current state regulations, the amens/operators have NEVER FILED AN ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS DESIGN PLAN. The landfill has not been REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH CURRENT SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL LAWS! When the landfill was begun, it was dug BELOW THE GROUNDWATER, was UNLINED, and TRASH WAS DUMPED INTO STANDING WATER, all in a major drainage area 1/2 mile from the Big Thompson River. RED, EVEN HOUSEHOLD WASTES SUCH AS PAINT CANS, SOLVENTS, CLEANERS AND GARDEN PESTICIDES CAN ENDANGER GROUND AND SURFACE WATER IF PLACED IN UNLINED DUMPS! The Greeley -Milliken dump has holding ponds on site, which collect water. It also has deep, dangerous trenches to divert groundwater and surface run-off. . _ _ — _ cONTAMINATION FROM 2-'AVY METALS is being detected in, neighboring irrigation -holding lakes. The headgates of these lakes are opened, the water leaves the lakes, goes into the irrigation ditches, finds its way through gravel beds and sloughs and INTO THE BIG THOMPSON AND THEN INTO THE SOU' PLATTE. IF THIS DUMP commiJLrrs TO GO UNNOTICED, contamination of Colorado's surface and ground water will result. The state Departent of Health, through its Solid and Hazardous Waste Division and the Division of Water Quality MUST BE URGED TO INVESTIGATE THE SOURCE OF THIS coNTA rIoNI PUBLIC ATTENTION AND FS C HFAR'1NGS rust focus on this facility so that it is closed and any resulting contamination is treated. Pleas' join COLORADANS - CONCERNED OVER WATER (C -COW) in focusing atten- tion on this serious problem. Indicate your concern by signing your name and address below. This petition will be given to the Colorado Department of Health, DEMANDING THAT THE LANDFILL OOV1LY WITH CURRENT FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS. Name A -641°)-77 c*i ' Cdr rA _ 7-564 4,64 4 Th 1 r_. `` Address '" At -c 4/ 4 G-(4 Gag -66 )% 7' et ti Giro &2 Y36 Yee. P . ar g/o 3i (0 0), r kc.2'ee 34611 Grerit`l 8063, Cr3 j/41 �,4//, flt tn,nr)21 J5ot-, n 7( / i �S /,.iet-I g71:12, C�;�r',, K�(-) 2.082 30" 5/ Y°-7si'l, 44 evil i e7 5,67 Aic G,.. r , lQ C'Q& 1 /7:u " t :" (° P? z 931061 Ault and another iWlanned near Ebensburg. The Greeley -Milliken landfill is UNREGULATED BY CURRENT STANDARDS. Be- cause it was established prior to the adoption of federal RCRA laws and prior to the adoption of current state regulations, the owners/operators have NEVER FILED AN ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS DESIGN PLAN. The landfill has not been REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH CURRENT SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL LAWS! When the landfill was begun, it was dug BELOW THE GROUNDWATER, was UNLINED, and TRASH WAS DUMPED INTO STANDING WATER, all in a major drainage area 1/2 mile from the Big Thompson River. REMEMBER, EVEN HOUSEHOLD WASTES SUCH AS PAINT CANS, SOLVENTS, CLEANERS AND GARDEN PESTICIDES CAN ENDANGER GROUND AND SURFACE WATER IF PLACED IN UNLINED DUMPS! The Greeley Milliken dump has holding ponds on site, which collect water. It also has deep, dangerous trenches to divert groundwater and surface run-off. . - _ _ - - CONTAMINATION FROM HEAVY METALS is being detected in neighboring irrigation -holding lakes. The headgates of these lakes are opened, the water leaves the lakes, goes into the irrigation ditches, finds its way through gravel beds and sloughs and INTO THE BIG THOMPSON AND THEN INTO THE SOUTH PLATTE. IF TICS DUMP CONTINUES TO GO UNNOTICED, contamination of Colorado's surface and ground water will result. The state Department of Health, through its Solid and Hazardous Waste Division and the Division of Water Quality MUST BE URGED TO INVESTIGATE THE SOURCE OF THIS CONTAMINATION! PUBLIC ATTENTION AND PUBLIC HEARINGS rust focus on this facility so that it is closed and any resulting Contamination is treated. Please join COLORADTtNS - CONCERNED OVER WATER (C- w) in focusing atten- tion on this serious problem. Indicate your concern by signing your name and address below. This petition will be given to the Colorado Department of Health, DEMANDING THAT THE LANDFILL COMPLY WITH CURRENT FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS. -"1 (947, _4;r?. P 1;e-qtye 00 9 !o/A/c //GL/vi r Address 71) 0 i 1 U'1 1 2 cLii/ LL nr okra o6 ? I ?Pe)! I'In lcue- �,,%;,/ j7//'h& �v'ee Fed 7/7 /r5✓t- `771- %1 pair cAc3 A 'Cc Y77 .2 7)n k E,cu Si" ,iii -.s Co i?G-3/ /I // LdClIlLy ill Cii]' 1NT1s 15 SOCaLIOU near Ault and another ianned near LCeensburg. The Greeley -Milliken landfill is UNREGULATED BY CORRE'T STANV'RCS. Be- cause it was established prior to the adoption of federal RCRA laws and prior to the adoption of current state regulations, the aaners/operators have NEVER FILED AN ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS DESIGN PLAN. The landfill has not been REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH CURRENT SOLID PASTE DISPOSAL LAWS! When the landfill was begun, it was dug BEd OW THE GROUNETAATER, was UNZTNF.O, and TRASH WAS DUMPED INTO STANDDNG WATER, all in a major drainage area 1/2 rule from the Big Thompson River. REMEMBER, EVEN HOUSEHOLD W7STES SUCK AS PAINS CANS, SOLVENTS, CLEANERS AND GARDEN PESTICIDES CAN ENDANGER GROUND AND SURFACE WATER IF PLACED IN UNLINED DUMPS! • The Greeley -Milliken dump has holding ponds on site, which collect water. It also has deep, dangerous trenches to divert groundwater and surface run-off. - - - - - CONTAMINATION FROM H AVX METALS is being detected in ng neighbori-irrigation-holding lakes. The headgates of these lakes are opened, the water leaves the lakes, goes into the irrigation ditches, finds its way through gravel } !s and sloughs and INTO THE BIG THOMPSON AND THEN INTO THE SOUTH PLATTE. IF THIS LUMP CONTINUES TO GO UNNOTICED, contamination of Colorado's surface and ground water will result. The state L>eparthent of Health, through its Solid and Hazardous Waste Division and the Division of Water Quality MUST BE URGED TO INVESTIGATE THE SOURCE OF THIS CONTAMINATION! PUBLIC ATTENTION AND PUBLIC H ARtiGS must focus on this facility so that it is closed and any resulting contamination is treated. PlraP join COLORADANS - CONCERNED OVER WATER (C -CO) in focusing atten- tion on this serious problem. Indicate your concern by signing your name and address below. This petition will be given to the Colorado Department of Health, DEMANDING THAT THE LANDFILL COMPLY WITH CURRENT FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS. Nana Address f7/P , li /4 (///fD /9) `/ // 1"/+-c, d� i `ffloAPIP ,Wepyrinte6 H</ T: • .-C 241--3-1 3aA w OSOn a:ls 77/" �v4 rg,os'4/ wq aill krn 1iael Vo) 21 zt- s4.&' Matt 9 1%1 IN UNLINED DUMPS: The Greeley -Milliken dung has holding ponds on site, which collect water. It also has deep, dangerous trenches to divert groundwater and surface run-off. . - _ _ _ _ oalrAMINATLON FROM HEAVY METALS is being detected in neighboring irrigation -holding lakes. The headgates of these lakes are opened, the water leaves the lakes, goes into the irrigation ditches, finds its way through gravel beds and sloughs and INTO THE BIG THawsoN AND THEN INTO THE SOUTH PLATTE. IF TELS DUMP CONTINUES TO GO UNNOTICED, contamination of Colorado's surface and ground water will result. The state Department of Health, through its Solid and Hazardous Waste Division and the Division of Water Quality MUPT RE .town ' C :TM:TIC= MT SOURCE OF HIS amorMLNAT'LUN! PUBLIC ATTENTION AND PUBLIC HEARINGS must focus on this facility so that it is closed and any resulting contamination • is treated. Please join COLORADANS - CONCERNED OVER WATER (C -COW) in focusing atten- tion on this serious problem. Indicate your concern by signing your name and address below. This petition will be given to the Colorado Department of Health, DEMANDING TAT THE LANDFILL C MPLY WLZH CURRENT FEDERAL AND SATE LAWS. f1;f,tt S� 'If ;V' • • Lc��-6t /a/.7.12 -7th u.E ,'i n r � w,,crc,c aovtiA,,✓ Address /(2S74/: (Jredn CO soil yy3 (�reciVs° g00a31 mcC,A,e, (-('fl Rn, $65 6k,attlk 6063 I n Q') t L".)8,1:4:;Q c eft 1! 2/0 .1A,/ ;c 6/6nY ( '-e. Iy, co 3pb3` Pa`31 4 Trpt1- *// 6rP%y, 4i BSo631 2// f clIrr�, i, (7/re by2I, /-{nrr , rem hrta r7 z l � I Icy /75671_ COY C h 1(--) oLll� HCkSVL Ott C-)(ee-le?).: kl '2o. i % /A -At 6nce/ey 0 8"06-3x/ /(124,1 /I A✓f G2EECcy Co $0 Li 1 Cpu1(). 5-, Fla fP 76„ .yap@651 2:1 1/4061 16,7 Liao i i.✓? of r% '%'E:.. -iip " r (r+o-KCy J0 . i I_ ,. n 1 itc,,, Jcti(�n1 3 (ea, Are Coa t f c$f �hekji Leverin to coon 1901 6fee, ?0103. "......7.7....s,, „,v-,..Lineva, . ,r4,.c77 it..., __ - . _ . • \.,...) . LA ,,, ih., ..�cc l� x K.G~,ececcy cc 106 li-, c� - IjCYW� �d�� ti rG Pfsrr_2/sort/ `%y8 4ofo �f 3 6G4q- ,( , ,�ci ','k 1....... 1103 iV+1'`S( i)1Q41>t,,� ° 11 sGu� 921061 -• - - --. uu ,.vn,,c1Tvcut 1 bK1;btbtX t•LLKtN LANDFILL Coloradans - Conl!rned Over Water (C-Ccw) is a group of concerned Colorado citizens who demand action by their elected representatives to protect public health and the environment. The Greeley -Milliken landfill is located in a MAJOR DRAYILAGE AREA, 1/2 mile from the Big Thompson River and 1 1/2 miles frau the South Platte River where the two rivers meet at Dos Rios. IN 1971, the Evans dump had reached capacity and the Greeley -Milliken landfill was proposed. Local farmers agreed to siting of the dump because they were promised it would be only an INTERIM DUMP, AND WOULD CLOSE NOT LATER THAN 1986, when a new site would be in operation. TODAY, 21 YEARS LATER, the Greeley -Milliken dump is still in operation, GROWING LARGER EACH DAY! The landfill continues, and threatens to EXPAND, even though a large, lined and buffered facility in dry lands is, located near Ault and another is planned near Keensburg. The Greeley -Milliken landfill is UNREGULATED BY CURRENT STANDARDS. Be- cause it was established prior to the adoption of federal RCRA laws and prior to the adoption of current state regulations, the owners/operators have NEVER FILED AN ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS DESIGN PLAN. The landfill has not been REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH CURRENT SOLID WASTE 015I AL LAWS! When the landfill was begun, it was dug UELfl 'THE GROuNtwATER, was UNLINED, and TRASH WAS DUMPED INTO STANDING wAltn, all in a major drainage area 1/2 mile from the Big Thompson River. REMEMBER, EVEN HOUSEHOLD WASTES SUCH AS PAINT CANS, SOLVENTS, CLEANERS AND GARDEN PESTICIDES CAN ENDANGER GROUND AND SURFACE WATER IF PLACED IN UNLINED DUMPS! The Greeley -Milliken dump has holding ponds on site, which collect water. It also has deep, dangerous trenches to divert groundwater and surface run-off- . v CONTAMINATION FROM HEAVY METALS is being detected in neighboring irrigation -holding lakes. The headgates of these lakes are opened, the water leaves the lakes, goes into the irrigation ditches, finds its way through gravel beds and sloughs and INTO THE BIG THOhPPSON AND THEN INTO THE SOUTH PLATTE. IF THIS DUMP CONTINUES TO GO UNNOTICED, contamination of Colorado's surface and ground water will result. The state Department of Health, through its Solid and Hazardous Waste Division and the Division of Water Quality MUST BE URGED TO INVESTIGATE THE: SOURCE OF THIS CONTAMINATION! PUBLIC ATTENTION AND PUBLIC I¢.AR1NGS must focus on this facility so that it is closed and any resulting contamination is treated. Please join COLORADANS - CONCERNED OVER WATER (C -COW) in focusing atten- tion on this serious problem. Indicate your concern by signing your name and address below. This petition will be given to the Colorado Department of Health, DEMANDING THAT THE LANDFILL COMPLY WITH CURRENT FEDERAI, AND STATE LAWS.. :re zest It Ad__ _Le{1s 'reezcV2 -1/6"Csign /71 P)ue 295 t 9 WcR 7O C -,'l,/ (ol /41(o k <7'h aviev e St -'2 (og4z/ /(--'itizei uk# &C°.(o -goolr /yr.7.,Iklokikloci Ca dab /12, cjorrPr r(/a vL ed gU a 31 f 0 ,c S W4sl,e ,.,9Ea,. Si 1j-^' &b -56142.,1ei y, 9x106 1 Wany.. SS W. C-44 W, even though a large, lined and buffered faci_ityJi, ty Ault and another lanned near Ebensburg. The Greeley -Milliken landfill is Uh12EarrA ED EY C cause it was established prior to the adoption of fodc_ to the adoption of current state regulations, the ace : FILED AN ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS DESIGN P I.N. The . REQUIRED 70CCMPLY WITH CURRENT SOLID WASTE OISPOGAL U ,`' was begun, it was dug BELOW THE GROUNDRATER, wa.; =7-7' INTO STANDING WATER, all in a major drainage area 1/2 Thompson River. REMEMBER, EVEN HOUSEHOLD JS'rEs SUCH CLEANERS AND GARDEN PESTICIDES CAN ENDANG G:'1_ ;,) AND IN UNLINED DUMPS! is located near NrSTANVARDS. ,Be- -,-:A laws and prior ::orators have NEVER has not been >;hen the land= - "d TRASH WAS =APED ' from the Big 'TNT CANS, SOLVENTS, WAT-Z IF PLACE The Greeley -Milliken dump has holding rent, en ci`- . •:.;uch collect water. It also has deep, dangerous trenahez to divert ._ : �41water and surface run-off. _ _ w CONTAMINATION FROM Eswz =us s, being detected in neighboring irrigation -holding lakes. The h .drates of lakes are openod, the water leaves the lakes, goes into the irri n ditches, finds its way through gravel beds and sloughs and .:.'J B , ...?SON P.:NO THEN INTO THE SOUTH PLATTE. IF THIS COMP CONTINUES TO CO is .. . , contamination of Colorado's surface arid ground water will recult. Divas Health, through its Solid and Hazardous Waste ion viat.e cr; the Division ioo�of nof Water Quality MUST BE URGED To INVESTIGATE r.riE sc[^CE O yS CONTA«TNATIONI PUBLIC ATTENTION AND PUBLIC HEARXN'GS r t focus c.. it is closed and any resulting contamination is `rota:. Please join COLORADANS - CONCERNED OVER MATER (C -c- tion on this serious problem. Indicate your concern by address below. This petition will be given to the Cole: -- .Health, DEMANDING THAT THE LANDFILL caw= w1:1: : C. RENT LAWS. Nano Ad:'.re roe A facility so that in focusing atten- ;ting your name and Department of StAL AND STATE 2./22_ / / 4cr 4 £ ckrta 4e rok,;; '..,t (t. Ya6t0 p/-,7 /7 l 1,t-D.!_l.:J � 71D QL.. q/A X1,2 C3mel n'7?'7 03 tc(w.ec 31 (12z '0 2-(1--f• (7:\k1\ eUc(AC0 £5051 ?t 2 931061 Ault and another tlanned near Eteensburg. eyed facility in ddry lands is located near • The Greeley -Milliken landfill is UNREGULATED BY CURRIIIT'STANDARES. Be- cause it was established prior to the adoption of federal RCRA laws and prior to the adoption of current state regulations, the owners/operators have NEVER FILED AN ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS DESIGN PLAN. The landfill has not been REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH CURRENT SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL LAWS! When the landfill was begun, it was dug BELOW THE aRoUNDwATER, was UNLINED, and TRASH WAS DUMPED INTO STANDING WATER, all in a major drainage area 1/2 mile from the Big Thomson River. REMEMBER, EVEN HOUSEHOLD WASTES SUCH AS PAINT CANS, SOLVENTS, CLEANERS AND GARDEN PESTICIDES CAN ENDANGER GROUNDAND SURFACE WATER IF PLACED IN UNLINED DUMPS! The Greeley -Milliken dams, has holding ponds on site, which collect water. It also has deep, dangerous trenches to divert groundwater and surface run-off. - _ _ CONTAMINATION FROM HEAVY HEMS is being detected in neighboring -irrigation -holding lakes. The headgates of these lakes are opened, the water leaves the lakes, goes into the irrigation ditches, finds its way through gravel beds and sloughs and INTO THE BIG 2HC21PSON AND THEN INTO THE SOUTH PLATTE. IF THIS DUMP CONTINUES TO GO UNNOTICED, contamination of Colorado's surface and ground water will result. The state Department of Health, through its Solid and Hazardous Waste Division and the Division of Water Quality MUST BE URGED TO INVESTIGATE THE SOURCE OF THIS CONTAMINATION! PUBLIC ATTENTION AND PUBLIC HEARINGS must focus on this facility so that it is closed and any resulting contamination is treated. Please join COLORADANS - CONCERNED OVER WATER (C -COW) in focusing etch, tion on this serious problem. Indicate your concern by signing your name and address below. This petition will be given to the Colorado Department of Health, DEMANDING THAT THE LANDFILL COMPLY WITH CURRENT FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS. Nam@ Address Kei 56.4,14,41.-N v cI -, l�L'll"'1�1i1 e ,)h!n o ntti V1 n rae, 7 WO nee". A a. r Aei //Par ThZZL% !/67 r PIN/ Pi , t>rr~ifr aces) ;Lc($ w.-atz,,,f,ut3q(drrwoo-ARD,75 UNG Llzu1CpriSov, cta t� RF�000lE,Ecrai r4c2g I c eie Loiviet11 tt. ' /y3U. Crj4. (. Sty/ FUS0N gtc s - 7%7 cp. 7O4h114P Ada , O scocai /0,?7 /7 Ave # l QrcEEei,CO Bocy/ erzie t�z4(rv/e h K.�1. �,: p� ll sr re (�i sor % Oar Q9y ( I/3a6 J/o/ .•2101 Ault and another Tanned near XeenSburg. The Greeley -Milliken landfill is UNREGULATED BY CURRENT'STANDARDS. Be- cause it was established prior to the adoption of federal RCRA laws and prior to the adoption of current state regulations, the owners/operators have NEVER FILED AN ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS DESIGN PLAN. The landfill has not been REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH CURRENT SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL LAWS! When the landfill was begun, it was dug BELOW THE GROUNDWATER, was UNLINED, and TRASH WAS DUMPED INTO STANDING WATER, all in a major drainage area 1/2 mile from the Big Thompson River, REMEMBER, EVEN HOUSEHOLD WASTES SUCH AS PAINT CANS, SOLVENTS, CLEANERS AND GARDEN PESTICIDES CAN ENDANGER GROUND AND suxmCE WATER IF PLACED IN UNLINED DUMPS! a 4.1 The Greeley -Milliken dump has holding ponds on site, which collect water. It also has deep, dangerous trenches to divert groundwater and surface run-off. - - - - - .. cNTAMINATION FROM HEAVY METAIS is being detected in ' neighboring irrigation -holding lakes. The headgates of these lakes are opened, the water leaves the lakes, goes into the irrigation ditches, finds its way through gravel beds and sloughs and INTO THE BIG T CtflSON AND THEN INTO THE SOUTH PLATTE. IF THIS DUMP CONTINUES TO GO UNNOTICED, contamination of Colorado's surface and ground water will result. The state Department of Health, through its Solid and Hazardous Waste Division and the Division of Water Quality MUST BE URGED TO INVESTIGATE THE SOURCE OF THIS CONTAMINATION! PUBLIC ATTENTION AND PUBLIC HEARINGS must focus on this facility so that it is closed and any resulting contamination is treated. Pleaca join CLORAD,ANS - CONCERNED OVER WATER (C-074) in focusing atten- tion on this serious problem. Indicate your concern by signing your name and address below. This petition will be given to the Colorado Department of Health, DEMANDING THAT THE LANDFILL COMPLY WITH CURRENT FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS. rpm C A" it CO,C.17 n i.R.. ,i Ada Zuccoro ACS 'emit - %ddz-ess (�!4 (.e/ fire. -criatind.,4 oz W mAAI/WDnA,AW - Liitomn /D -?I /%Ye R rreff y, (o ECYv3/ )( oQQtco c 4 lYXt. k1 • �'� S�. C�e�a� 1 "1 It4 31sIS 2S %jde�Qn,.Cn. T06,1 162,01 /O21h Sf-6reek y8a rs) J i (o 114% A Q_ (Ka cf-11(93/ Co (CM\ 931061 ' HAVE A C -COW!! BE CONCERNED!! GREEELEY-M LIKEN LANDFILL Coloradans - Concerned Over Water (C -COW) is a group of concerned Colorado citizens who demand action by their elected representatives to protect public health and the environment. The Greeley -Milliken landfill is located in a MAJOR DRAINAGE AREA, 1/2 mile from the Big Thompson River and 1 1/2 miles from the South Platte River where the two rivers meet at Dos Rios. IN 1971, the Evans dump had reached capacity and the Greeley -Milliken landfill was proposed. Trral farmers agreed to siting of the dtmp because they were promised it would be only an INTERIM DuMP, AND WOULD CLOSE NOT LATER THAN 1986, when a new site would be in operation. TODAY, 21 YEARS LATER, the Greeley Milliken dump is still in operation, GROWING LARGER EACH DAY! The landfill continues, and threatens to EO?AND, even though a large, lined and buffered facility in dry lands is located near Ault and another is planned near Keensb rg. The Greeley -Milliken landfill is ME ML = BY CORRENT STANDARDS. Be- cause it was established prior to the adoption of federal. RCRA laws and prior to the adoption of current state regulations, the owners/operators have NEVER FILED AN ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS DESIGN FtM. The landfill has not been REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH CURRENT SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL LAWS! When the landfill was begun, it was dug BUIXV THE GROUNDWATER, was UNLINED, and TRASfi WAS DUMPED INTO STANDING WATER, all in a major drainage area 1/2 mile from the Big Thompson River. REMEMBER, EVEN HOUSEHOLD WASTES SUCH AS PAINT CANS, SOLVENTS, CLEANERS AND GARDEN PESTICIDES CAN ENDANGER MOUND AND SURFACE WATER IF PLACED IN UNLINED DUMPS! The Greeley -Milliken dump has holding ponds on site, which collect water. It also has deep, dangerous trenches to divert groundwater and surface run-off. _ - CONTANGNATION FROM NAVY METALS is being detected in neighboring irrigation -holding lakes. The headgates of these lakes are opened, the water leaves the lakes, goes into the irrigation ditches, finds its way through gravel Ws and sloughs and INTO THE BIG THOMPSON AND THEN INTO THE SOUTH PLATTE. IF THIS DUMP CONTINUES TO GO UNNOTICED, contamination of Colorado's surface and ground water will result. The state Department of Health, through its Solid and Hazardous Waste Division and the Division of Water Quality MUST BE URGED TO INVESTIGATE THE SOURCE OF THIS CONTAtCNATION! PUBLIC ATTENTION AND PUBLIC HEARINGS must focus on this facility so that it is closed and any resulting contamination is treated. Please join COLORADANS - CONCERNED OVER WATER (C-cz7W) in focusing atten- tion on this serious problem. Indicate your concern by signing your name and address below. This petition will be given to the Colorado Department of Health, DEMANDING THAT THE LANDFILL COMPLY WITH CURRENT FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS. 7r" L.7_� � Address c&44 / a/,`? •Cd* Coo CC6l/d, //9g9 at. an 12) zoois //fig &AA /7)6, 67'j4t #767 JL -c2 co ?gar l 3S--8 S.OroJcOG .7)QiV SoaaL 11 a s!.5 CC.t/ iA J teacit f ooiZ ' 33/ S7 -C t,J;7 me , mqrr SAa 92'01061 BEFORE THE WELD COUNTY COMMISSIONERS IN THE MATTER OF THE CENTRAL WELD COUNTY LANDFILL April 5, 1993 SUMMARY OF PRESENTATION ASHTON-DANIELS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION INTRODUCTION The Ashton -Daniels Neighborhood Association is a citizens' group of Weld County residents, including families adversely affected by the improper activities of the owners and operators of the Central Weld County Landfill since its inception in 1971. The landfill operation has been conducted illegally since 1971, and its certificate to operate should be revoked. This proceeding, occurring on April 5, 1993, is to determine whether "a reasonable ground for belief in the existence of facts warranting the proceedings complained of" exists. ("Weld County, Procedures for Probable Cause Hearings," dated March 23, 1992.) Thus, this proceeding is not an adjudicatory hearing on the merits. Its purpose is to determine whether an order to show cause shall be issued, by the Commissioners to the owners and operators of the Central Weld County Landfill, as to why the landfill's certificate of designation should not be revoked. The documentary evidence (see Ashton -Daniels Neighborhood Association Exhibits A.D.-1 through A.D.- 45) alone is enough to justify and require issuance of the order to show cause. Since the first dumpload of waste was deposited in the landfill, each owner and operator has dumped there in violation of the certificate of designation, contrary to the land use zoning laws and regulations of Weld County and the State of Colorado, causing a great public nuisance and environmental depredations. On January 18, 1993 (Exhibit A.D.-30), and again on February 15, 1993 (Exhibit A.D.-31), the Ashton - Daniels Neighborhood Association requested a hearing. On January 14, 1993 (Exhibit A.D.-28) and January 18, 1993 (Exhibit A.D.-29), the Weld County Health Department and the Weld County Department of Planning Services cited Waste Services, Inc., a subsidiary of Waste Management, Inc., for violations of Colorado's Solid Waste Disposal Sites and Facilities Act (the "Act"), C.R.S. § 30-20-101 et seq., and Weld County's Land use, zoning, and special use requirements. As of March 30, 1993 (Exhibit A.D.-30), the facility continued to be in non-compliance, and a hearing on revocation of the certificate of designation should be 2 t1061 scheduled, resulting in a decision to revoke the certificate of designation and require closure and remedial action pursuant to the laws and regulations of Weld County, the State of Colorado, and the United States. I. SUMMARY OF FACTS WARRANTING ISSUANCE OF AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AS TO WHY THE CERTIFICATE OF DESIGNATION FOR THE CENTRAL WELD COUNTY LANDFILL SHOULD NOT BE REVOKED Pursuant to a public hearing held on September 22, 1971, before the Weld County Commissioners (Exhibit A.D.-6, Transcript of Hearing 9-22-71), a certificate of designation (Exhibit A.D.-9) was issued for the Central Weld County Landfill under the Act and under Weld County's land use and zoning authorities. Siting of the landfill could occur, under then existing legal authority, only as a use by special review. Prior to the September 22, 1971 hearing, the state's Solid Waste Act had been amended (as set forth more fully below) to require review and approval by the county, as to land use, and by the state, as to minimum sanitary, engineering, environmental and operational requirements. 3 S:1061 On July 15, 1971 (Exhibit A.D.-1), Mr. Orville Stoddard, P.E., of the Colorado Department of Health requested the engineering report required by the State Solid Waste Disposal Act as amended by the Colorado General Assembly earlier that year. The applicant for the landfill certificate of designation successfully resisted the pre -submission of "an engineering report concerning the design and operation of the site" unless he had assurance that the Weld County Commissioners would grant him the land use approval (Exhibit A.D.-3.) At the September 22, 1971 public hearing (as more fully set forth below and in the presentations made at this hearing of April 5, 1993 by the Weld County citizens), cogent and compelling testimony was presented (Exhibit A.D.-6) that the chosen site was not suitable for location of a landfill due to groundwater conditions prevalent in the immediate vicinity. Nevertheless, the certificate of designation issued, based on express representations of the applicant that no groundwater contamination would occur, that the facility's life would be 15 to 20 years at most, that disposal of the waste would be in the 4 s:Rost ground and not above the surface of the ground, that operations would cease if groundwater were contacted, and that the landfill surface would be returned to farmable ground compatible with surrounding agricultural ground within 15 to 20 years. An express condition of the Weld County Commissioners' resolution of October 6, 1971, granting the certificate of designation was: 1. That any sanitary landfill facility to be installed shall be _approved by the State Department of Health. (Exhibit A.D.-8.) This condition was expressly included as an integral part of weld County's land use decision because the applicant represented that he would not commence operation until the engineering and operations approval of the State Health Department was obtained. This approval was to be based on an engineering report to be submitted by the applicant, taking into account sections 3 and 4 of the state's regulations which were then being developed (see Exhibit A.D.-3) and which were finalized early in 1972 (Exhibit A.D.-4), not long after Weld County issued the certificate of designation based on the explicit condition of Health Department approval prior to construction of the landfill and 5 initiation of disposal activities. Again, please note that condition number 1 of the October 6, 1971 resolution is that state approval shall be obtained for the "sanitary landfill facility to be installed." (Exhibit A.D.-8.) No engineering report was submitted or approved prior to the commencement of disposal operations, and the certificate of designation should and must be revoked for violation of a material condition precedent. This site is not suitable, and never was suitable, for disposal of waste because of prevailing groundwater conditions in the area. (See Exhibits A.D.-6, A.D.- 41', A.D.-422, A.D.-433 and A.D.-44".) It is probable 'Glenn Billings, former Chairman of the Weld County Commissioners states that one of the reasons he voted against the landfill in 1971 was, "A high water table (such as the one around the Milliken (Central Weld County) Landfill) is not conducive to any landfill operations." (Exhibit A.D.-41.) 2Albion Carlson, a trained geologist and environmental scientist for the State of New Mexico, states, "The footprint of Central Weld Landfill is located in historic year-round wetlands and slough area, draining into the Big Thompson River and into historic Spomer Lake, adjacent wetlands, man-made ponds and ditches which function as areas of significant ground water recharge . . ." (Exhibit A.D.-42.) ;According to the evaluation prepared by the Colorado Department of Health regarding landfills in Weld County, "All existing landfill sites are located in aquifer recharge areas, 6 that preparation of a proper engineering report, upon review of the State Health Department pursuant to sections 3 and 4 of the regulations applicant agreed to abide by, would have resulted in no approval by the State Health Department. Throughout two decades, the owners of the landfill have violated the condition precedent for landfilling at this site, an approved engineering design and operations plan (Exhibit A.D.-39), with the consequence that all waste at the site has been disposed of illegally, to the detriment of the laws of Weld County and the State of Colorado and their residents and citizens. Only one remedy can suffice to serve the public interest and uphold the law inviolable against violation of express representations in gaining land use approval: that it be revoked as a result of a show flood plains or irrigated farmlands or are near population centers . . . The overall drainage pattern in Weld County is dendritic resulting in a high degree of interrelationship between streams and rivers. Pollution of any part may result in pollution of the whole . . ." (Exhibit A.D.-43.) 4The U.S.G.S map demonstrates that in the area in which the Central Weld County Landfill is located, "Liquid wastes or leachates from solid waste could be introduced directly into the ground -water system by water moving through landfills . . . resulting in degradation or pollution of the ground water." (Exhibit A.D.-44.) 7 :� 71.081„, cause hearing. XI. THIS FACILITY IS IN VIOLATION OF COLORADO'S ACT AND WELD COUNTY'S LAND USE AUTHORIZATION The original Solid Waste Disposal Act of 1967 required any person who wished to operate a solid waste disposal facility to "make application to the Board of County Commissioners" of the county in which the facility is located. 1967 Session Laws, p. 759. The application was required to include the location of the facility, the type of facility, type of processing to be used, "such as sanitary landfill, composting, or incineration," the hours of operation, the method of supervision, the rates to be charged, "and such other information as may be required by the Board of County Commissioners." IA. at 759-760. The 1967 Act also provided that "designation of approved solid waste disposal sites or facilities shall be discretionary with the Board of County Commissioners, subject to judicial review. . ." Id. at 760. The original Act also required all disposal sites to comply with the health laws, standards, rules and regulations of the State He.lth Department and the water pollution control commission, as well as all applicable zoning laws and ordinances." 3d. at 761. 8 .•i 4.0!x.`•,. In 1971, the Act was amended, effective July 1, 1971. Changes to the application provision required that the application contain scientific data required by the State Department of Health regulations. SQe C.R.S. § 30-20-103 (1). It also provided for review of the application by the department based upon criteria established by the State Board of Health, State Water Pollution Control Commission, and the Air Pollution Control Commission. Id. The amendments added the further requirement that, prior to issuance of the Certificate of Designation, the Board of County Commissioners had to ensure that: 1) the application had been reviewed by the Department of Health; 2) the Department of Health had approved or disapproved the application; and 3) the proposed facility conforms to the comprehensive county land use plan, if any. ,age C.R.S. § 30-20-104 (3) (a). The provision provided for notice of public hearing for review of all pertinent information before the county commissioners. The minimum standards provision of the 1967 Act was amended to provide, in part: 9 "A site and facility operated as a sanitary landfill shall provide means of finally disposing of solid wastes on land in a manner to minimize nuisance conditions. . .and shall provide compacted fill material, adequate cover with suitable material and surface drainage designed to prevent ponding and water and wind erosion, prevent water and air pollution. . ." See C.R.S. S 30-20-110. The Act, as amended, gave the Commissioners the power to revoke a Certificate of Designation for failure to comply with all applicable laws, ordinances and resolutions or with any provision of the Act. See C.R.S. S 30-20-112. In this case, the Commissioners exercised their discretion based on the representations made to it by the applicant at the September 22, 1971 public hearing. The application was a one -page form that provided no information regarding design and operation of the landfill. (Exhibit A.D.-2.) Applicant represented that all pertinent engineering and operational information and assurances would be forthcoming if land use approval were given. The representations were both material and materially misleading, induced issuance of the certificate of designation, and must be strictly enforced as binding on all subsequent operation, operators, and successors in interest. The 1971 public hearing transcript demonstrates 10 931061 numerous representations made by the applicant to the Commissioners and the community that the landfill would not contaminate underground or surface waters. Repeatedly, the applicant assured the Commissioners that if it encountered water, it would intercept and divert the water to avoid contamination. Transcript at pp. 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 30, 31, 34, 36, 37 & 38. According to the applicant's testimony, "Anything that occurs and drains from the fill area will be merely surface water and seepage water that is in good condition." Transcript at p. 11. When Ralph Waldo, a community member opposing the opposition, asserted that the "whole hillside (where the landfill would be located) is seeping," the applicant responded, "we are going to intercept that water." Transcript at p. 13.5 One community member in particular, Guy Shable, was very insistent that water seepage would be an unsolvable problem if the landfill were located at the proposed site. See transcript at p. 34. According to Mr. Shable, [who spent his entire life living and farming in the immediate area of the proposed site,) 'The Weld County Commissioners based their approval of the application on their belief in assurances that there would be no water contamination. "The important thing that we will be looking at, of course, is to make sure that water pollution does not occur from this operation in any way, shape or form." Transcript at pp. 30-31. 11 931%1 intercepting the seepage water would not work: "But you're not going to be able to cut it [seepage water] all off." Transcript at p. 35. When the applicant claimed that the landfill would not contaminate groundwater flowing below the site, Shable again challenged. "It's got to come up through your landfill. Why won't it come up through your landfill?" Transcript at p. 37. The applicant again assured the Commissioners it could intercept the water and divert it around the landfill. Transcript at p. 38. Finally, after enumerating his concerns relating to water contamination, Mr. Waldo stated that the opponents of the landfill would like conditions placed on the certificate of designation to ensure that the landfill does not contaminate surface and ground water in the area. Transcript at p. 18. The applicant assured the Commissioners that if the landfill complied with all applicable regulations, water quality would not be a problem. See Transcript at p. 18. Not content with just the assurances of the applicant, the Weld County Commissioners required, as condition number 1 for installation of the landfill facility, that approval first be obtained by the Health Department. (Exhibit A.D.-8.) 12 931061 Current information is that groundwater has been contaminated by the landfill operation. (Exhibits A.D.-28, A.D.-29, A.D.-32, A.D.-41.) of course, this is not surprising. At the 1971 hearing, citizens of Weld County overwhelmingly attested to the boggy conditions of the site and surrounding area. So much dispersed water percolates through the area that it is impossible to capture it all. This information was available to the applicant, if not before the hearing, then certainly at the hearing and thereafter. The applicant chose to ignore the citizens• concerns, continuously asserting that it would have no trouble capturing and diverting the water. Additionally, the applicant represented at the hearing that the landfill would not exceed the normal grade and contour of the surrounding agricultural land. Transcript at p. 17. The operation plan as presented to the Commissioners was premised on digging down, not piling up. "[W]e•re talking about going to a depth of maybe 50 feet . . . we need depth for a landfill." Transcript at pp. 24-25. In fact, the lifespan of the site as represented at the hearing was premised on digging down. The applicant represented that the anticipated lifespan of 13 931%1 the landfill would be approximately 15 years, based on an 80 acre site with a depth of 45 feet. Transcript at p. 28. According to the applicant, if the geography of the site permitted digging deeper than 45 feet, then it would likely keep the landfill open beyond 15 years. But if they could not dig that deep, the lifespan of the site would be shortened proportionately. "Now if it turns out that shale and sandstone is in there to the point to where it is not practical to move it, we've got to figure to balance the job out sooner Transcript at p. 28. Operators of the landfill never excavated to a depth anywhere approaching 50 feet. Rather, they have disposed of garbage at the site to a level far in excess of the normal grade in comparison to surrounding agricultural land uses. The landfill has become a steadily rising mound of trash, creating a public nuisance and contaminating the environment, far exceeding the promised 15 year life. The applicant represented that the land upon closure would be returned to "a good piece of farm ground," (transcript at p. 7), so that farming could be recommenced there (transcript at p. 8). 14 931061 Now is the time to enforce this express representation by remediation and closure orders pursuant to a noticed public hearing on re•ocation of the certificate of designation. CONCLUSION A show cause order should be issued to Waste Services, Inc. to show why the certificate of designation should not be revoked for 1) failure to submit an engineering report and design and operations plan and receive the approval of the State Department of Health prior to land fill installation, 2) creation of a public nuisance, 3) violation of the minimum sanitary, engineering, and operational standards of the Colorado Department of Health, and 4) non-compliance with Weld County land use, zoning, and special use resolutions and approvals. Dated this 5th day of April, 1993. Respectfully submitted, Gregory J. Hobbs, Jr., #DO`0 Jennifer Russell, #22047 Hobbs, Trout & Raley, H.C. 1775 Sherman St., Suite 1300 Denver, Colorado 80203 Tele: (303) 861-1963 Fax: (303) 832-4465 ATTORNEYS FOR ASHTON-DANIELS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION 15 931061 4IPCOLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 0 DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND SANITATION ACTIVITY REPORT Section Engineering FILE REFERENCE: Weld County - MS -F ar M ffatt, INDIVIDUAL OR ESTABLISHMENT: ADDRESS: Prapnse& Sanitary landfill Site. Contractoj Code MS -6 County Weld NARRATIVE: A meeting was held at the proposed sanitary landfill site located approximately 9 miles south and west of Greeley. The estimated area of the site is 106 acres. Present were William Gahr, Orville Stoddard and Ron Schuyler of the Colorado Department of Health; Dr. Cleaver and Glen Paul of the Weld County Health Department, and Earl Moffat, Contractor and site operator. The purpose of the meeting was to review in general the suitability of the site and the submittal of an engineering report required by the State Solid Waste Disposal Act as amended in 1971, Earl Moffatt described in general terms; 1. Location and access relative to centroids of a generation. 2. Traffic control to and from the site for an estimated 500 vehicles per day. 3. Method of site operation, areas to be excavated, areas to be filled, and the depth of the excavation. 4. Finish topography and planned land use. 5. Stock piling of top soil and cover material, 6. Construction and location of fences to control blowing refuse. Also the use of stockpiled cover material as a natural barrier, 7. Personnel and equipment at the site to provide daily cover and means to prevent and control fires. 8. The methods for controlling surface drainage. 9. The results of previous soil borings indicate underground water problems to be minimal at this location. The requirements for an engineering report describing design and operation of the site, public hearings, recommended approval by the Weld County Commissioners prior to operation were discussed. A kit containing a check list for reviewing an "Application for Cer- tificate of Designation," and "County -wide Disposal" and copies of the State Solic Waste Disposal Act with a draft of rules and regula- tions was transmitted to those present. These are to provide guidance in the develo ment and review of the re aired engineering report. LETTER TO FOLLOW: ( ) OTHER RECOMMENDATIONS: DATE: July 15 , 1971 . REPRESEt EXHIBIT ES: 7 (Rev. 6-70-100) 931061 ACTIVITY REPORT Section: Engineering Date: July 15, 1971 Code: MS -6 County: Weld Reference: Weld County - MS -6 Earl Moffatt, Contractor Subject: Proposed Sanitary Landfill Site: Page 2 NARRATIVE: Earl Moffatt did not want to go to the expense of an engineering firm and have the application for the "Certificate of Designation" refused by the County Commissioners. He was also concerned about the time lapse from submittal of the application until such time as the site could be used. He estimates approximately six months at the present disposal site. Glen Paul was of the opinion the information required in the en- gineering report could be supplied by county staff personnel and submitted to the Department for review and recommended approval. He felt much of the geographical, geological, hydrological, cli- mateological maps and specific data is readily available from the Soils Conservation Service, and the County engineers office. Details of site facilities, equipment and site operation plan were obtainable from the site operator. Mr. Gahr and 0. Stoddard stressed the importance of submitting a complete report at an early date to enable the department to pro- vide recommended approval or disapproval prior to the public hearing and site designation. A copy of the procedural guide for a special use permit application and a special use application form was discussed by Glen Paul. The proposed land use, sanitary landfill operation, does require a special use permit. cc: Dr. Cleaver County Commissioners 0. Stoddard, P.E. 931061 s APR 1 '9S 14146 FROM WELD CO TREASURER TO 1032446S PACE.004r01. OFFICE OF WELD COUNTY ■OAR° or COUNTY COMMISSIONI5R5 COMMISSIONERS MARSHALL N. ANDERSON MARRY S. ASHLEY GLUNN K, all MR* COLORADO July 21, 1971 Weld County Planning Commission County Services Building Greeley, Colorado r.ONA (Sea) an.111a KAT. It. 1L. AND 111 Counmouar QRf .gY. sofas Gentlemen= Please review the enclosed application form for A waste disposal site and return said application to our office AA coon as possible. Thank you. Sincerely, The Hoard of County Commissioners Weld County, Colorado By, 931061 APR 1 97 14146 FROM WELD CO TREASURER TO 1$72446:, PAGE. oci7 '01T APPLICATION FOR COUNTY LICENSE FOR WASTE DISPOSAL SITE FEE $$5.00 Greeley, Colorado S- 1 , 19L.,L_ TO THE BOARD OP COt NTX COMaISSIONERS O8' WELD COUNTY, COLORADO The undersigned hereby makes application for County License for Waste Disposal site to be operated by applicant under supervision of the proper designated health authority and in accordance with all applicant. laws, rules and regulations. I. Name of applicant W✓«-(11%NT,f'.Z#,Y�lF/La/,q�c F`�fIvS. C cis dhn_ -74'SliW - y �'S OuT// -he sr box aua. + � 21. r�P -4 41— it 2. State nearby to xr. Addr... Sour#40717:- A- d.6-G6-44erild_z• 1 ^ . - di 0- 3. State nearby water course• Z frf_LA: SS o d/- 4. Type of facility (Sanitary Landfill or Compost plant, Incinerator, etc.) £4 -MO -f/1 L.- 5. Method of Supervision: S Qt -1I _0 AC Sint - 6. Is dump open to the publie rA-J Hours 9304 #. re if -NW -Sabi- Saw - 83 (-//T c 7. Rain U -S le/hr/?. G!l/it/. C0MMI5 S/4NE/ S 8. Approval or sppianai of Health Departmen 9. Approval or fwppass l of Planning Commiaaion—.C .4,t Po • / STATE OF S,p.Y„ tart tr.4G le Casty of fe..GGC. SEAL Suhearlb.d and sworn to before me this �/ _....1 d ... .day of ..�{L�LKL .-......._......... 19J__�. . 0 LcY�/ 771 I /Alp rikt ,�(`.dr a N. 13,1411 •,vim Apt ant 1.14C 7, is..a.rs;.a. was M d,4v swam a W\, Aar...9 .wa W a00aq.t as...aaa.d: That ..shat gad 1M abM, and i.ws patea....d at* mezzo rJ. WSW wWt gar, a l . aW aura tb[ ..wea made b IL ul . rupataw Nan. at lank a uw N own bagwhq. COUNTY COMMISSLONSR.y 931061 . APR 1 '97 14'47 FROM WELD CO TREASURER TO 18324465 PRGE • 03i 6/01? BEFORE THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION OF RECOM4ENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY CCAIsSISSIONERS Case No. SUP 116 Date 3/4171 APPLICATION OF Veld County Landfill ,,Inc. Address ,Earl Moffat,Cox E9, Evans,., Colorado Mo„*3 by _John Weigand that the following resolution be introducadforpac- sage by the Weld County Planning Commissions Be it Resolved by the Weld County Planning Commission that the application for reeedititcfRR'A ......__.. ( Distfl $c tt .:..__.. ( .._...... ._...... titist ttict.............S.ITE...FaPrRC1!P.L...._.... of covering the following described property in Weld County, Colorado, to -wit: The west-`a1f of t!1^_ neut'r:e_st-quarter (lr.IT1) one '.P Soot:least- auarttr of the Seuthl!est-411arter (SELLS};) of Section Thirty -tiro (3Z), Township FIVC (S) forth, 7ssroe Sixty-six (`) Vest of the Cth P. M., bold Ccurty. Colorado be recommended (favorably) (OwtamtWalf0 to the Board of County Commissioners for the following reasons: t e Compati..le v:ith surrounding lance use and zoning Motion seconded by Ronald...N.ci.txma Vote; For Passages ' 1er. ',ndernon Ronald Reitman John r1_igand Philip Cowles John 'datson • Against Passage: ........._._..._.._ ............._...__...__..... • The chairman declared the Resolution passed and cordered that a certified copy be forwarded with the file of this case to the Board of County Commissioners for further proceedings- ' 931061 pc -Z-005 APR 1 '93 14'48 FROM WELD CO TREASURER T01832446:: PAGE -007'017 CERTIFICATION OF COPY I, ...,.Qoro.thy..ili..1.L , Recording Secretary of Weld County Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution is a true copy of Resolution of Planning Commission of Weld County, Colorado, adoptcd nn Augvs,.w,,,, ..h,,_1171, and recorded in Book No. ..._ 1.1.1... , Page No. , of the proceedings of said Planning Commission. PC -z -O06 Dated this ",,th...._... day of ..._ A'd :tltC_..._........_... 19 i.2 - Rneottl.nq Secretary, Weld County Planning Commission 331061 APR 1 '93 14148 FROM WELD CO TREASURER TO 18324463 PAOE.00&'01^ Wagner E. Spomer WETS. COUNTY T.ANT1FTT,1, ,TNC. 1006, SWX end SEX, SW% Kniater T)� Nom Tnc. N . ome Kniater A. Spomer King a S Isec. Shable E. Spomer King 931061 APR 1 '93 14148 FROM WELL CO TREASURER TO 1832446,3 PAct. e09/e1 timer Knister Route 3, Box 426 Greeley, Coloardo 80631 Ann Spomer etal % Russell Billings First National Bank Building Greeley, Colorado 80631 Harold 7. , C. Donald and Kenneth King % Pastor and Arthur Garcia Milliken. Colorado 80543 Dos Rios Inc. % First National Bank Trust Department 8ox 1058 Greeley, Coloardo 80631 Ella Spomer Rnute 1, Box 57 Milliken, Coloardo 80543 Henry Wagner Route 3 Greeley, Coloardo 80632 Guy A. Shable Route 1 Milliken, Coloardo 80543 931061 APR 1 '93 14149 FROM WELD CO TREASURER 7C 183'44.16.'+ PAGE.013A17 OL1.NN N. OILLIN02. 4!IAU MAN Nl, a, no( iC. OOCCL(Y. COW. NnnOLO W. ANOASSON. C0Annonn MM., MO At. B. IOI.M10Y6WY. Cole. M.brOnA�L n. AND[AOON. MSMOen a '& .en AVl604.0. Orroc t or TM it WZLO COUNTY PLANNING GOMMISS ON 7/29!71 • To Whom It May Concern: Al MNAN LOANSON GOV wANPLO ,CST 4.•y. • AND Na Your application for approval of a Waste Disposal Site will be reviewed before the Weld County Planning Commission on Tuesday, August 3, 1971 4th Floor Hearingq Room. Court.Rouse at 4:30 P. M. itletektdtagseksksmaxexame Please be present or have a representative present. sincerely. o� O urman orenson planning Ulrector APR 1 '93 14'49 FROM WELD CO TREASURER • • TO 1832446: PPOE.011%01^ 20' access easement across lull 12, 9, 6 and 3. Each would serve 3 lots. Mr. Lorenson read a letter from the Town of rt. Lupton's town board and planning commission stating they have no objections to the proposed development, it also meets meets their Comprehensive Plan, Mr. Paul stated the Health Department has not received an application for septic system or percolation tests. Mr. Lorenson stated Ft. Lupton will be unable to supply water to this development. MUIIUN: By Mr. Heitman to approve the preliminary plat subject to approval of the Health Department and the forms being submitted. Second by Mr. Weigand. A vote of "Aye" by Anderson on the basis of Ft. Lupton's approval, Weigand, Heitman, Bowles. "Nay" by Watson. Motion carried. APPLICANTS:: Foster 8 Schott Farms CASE NUMBER: S-91 tape 367 SUBJECT: Preliminary plat of Northwest Acres LOCATION: NWk Sec 32 77 R67 APPEARANCE:. Mr. Foster, Mr. Schott, Gerald McRae DISCUSSION: Mr. Lorenson stated a drainage report has been submitted which was to have been evaluated by the County Engineer. App- lication has been made to the Health Department which has been approved. The subdivision design meets the requirements of the "A' zone. Mr. Foster is willing to work out a contract with North Weld Water District to serve the area. Mr. Lorenson stated this is counter to our developmental onlicy. He would like to have considered,a moratorium on subdivisions in the County for 9t1 days, until the "A" zone is completed and adopted and that the developmental standards for subdivisions be adopted and put in force. Mr. McRae stated he had a letter from the Lakely Lateral Company stating they will accept into the Lakely Lateral the drainage water as they have In the past as long as 1t comes in at selected points. Mr. Foster stated through a negotiated contract with the water &;umpany, they will install a storage tank and booster. MOTION: By Mr. Anderson Lo table this matter until Mr. Lorenson can check on the legality of a moratorium on subdivisions. Second by Mr. Watson. A vote of "Aye" by Anderson, watson, Welgaed, Bowles and Heitman. APPLICANT: Weld County Landfill, Inc. CASE NUMBER: SUP 114 tape 36/ (-:•- / SUBJECT: Site approval for landfill - LOCATION: Ws1 SW►{ t SE$ $W'; Sec 32 T5 R66 APPEARANCE: Earl Moffat DISCUSSION: Mr. Lorenson stated the land surrounding the site is compatible for a landfill. Mr. Paul stated the land is hilly. There was discussion regarding the legal description which was corrected. Mr. Mcffat stated their present site at Evans is nearly exhausted. MOTION: By Mr. Heitman to take the matter under advisement. Second 'by Mr. Watson. A vote of "Aye" by Anderson, Watson,. Weigand, Bowles and Heitman. Motion carried. RESOLUIIUN: Be it therefore resolved to recommend approval to the Board of County Commissioners subject to meeting the Health Department's requirements and the information being submitted to 8/3/71 670 931061 APR 1 '93 1417/0 FROM WELD CO TREASURER TO 1a32446:7 PAGE.012/017 1 the State Health Department. Motion by Mr. Weigand, second by Mr. Heitman. A vote of "Aye" by .'nderson, Watson, Weigand, Bowles and Heitman. Motion carried. j _ APPLICANT: David Fagerburg CASE NUMBER: S-90 tape 367 SUBJECT: Preliminary plat of Grand View Estates LOCATION: Pt Was SW1 Sec 23 + pt Eh SEa Sec 23 16 R66 APPEARANCE: Tom Collins OiSCUSSION: Mr. Lorenson stated he has recommended a maximum of 20 lots averaging 2> acres each and development in tract "A' be restricted and a letter from the Ogilvy Ditch Company in. dicating any easement requirements t ., the A letter from the Soil Conservation Service was read. indicating there could be problems with septic tanks during the irrigating sea:3a. Mr. lorenson had suggested the developers develop some kind of of underground drainage system t.o drain the water table to a lower level. They have indicated that if this is a requirerc.lt, they will proceed with this plan. The application for approval of septic tank systems has been approved by Glen Paul. Mr. Ewing stated the realignment of the road proposed by tho developers would eliminate a traffic problem that now e_:ists. Mr. Lorenso:: Stated if the preliminary plat is approved, the drainage stun: would be made before the final plat is approved. The City of Greeley has indicated they would not be able to Serve this ar• 'with water or sewer in the near future. MOTION: By Mr. Watson to approve the preliminary plat suij eel Lc the approval of the drainage study on the final plat. Second Mr. Weigand. A vote of "Aye" by Watson, Weigand, Bowles and Heitman. "Nay" by Anderson. Motion carried. SUBJECT: Amendment to "A" zone regarding ges installations DISCUSSION: Mr. Ewing presented his p.upused amendment regarding gt_ installations along the County Right -of -Way. Stated the key word in the amendment is"production". The set -back requirement would be 300 feet from any R/W and 330 feet from any section line. One advantage would be safety. The sllghway Dept. stated it would be an advantage them in in aquirincu right -or -way. Mr. Ewing stated they would like to eliminate the loading and unloading of trucks on the highway. Mr. Robert Houtchens, representing tit. Greeley Gas Company, recommended that the companies supplying gas should Se expressly eliminated. Setting t'e lines back 300 reet would create quite a hardship. f:aivt:• :,Leer, representing the Panhandle Western Gas Company, stated they are willing to work out reasonable regulations. Felt tha proposed set -back would be a hardship on the companies,, also the land owners. Mr. Bowles stated no structure, according to the present regulations, is allowed less than 50 feet from the right-of-way. Asked if the 50 feet set -back would be agreeable. Mr. Bart Giles of Amico Corporation stated they have been drilling in Weld County during the past year. They felt 300 feet is a little extreme. If these proposed set -backs become a regulation, they felt there should b:: 'some exceptions, especially where they would interfer with sprinklers. Mr. Bowles stated he thought some of the meterinn stations to the past have been set too close to the road, cau:'� traffic problems. Mr. Ray Fouts with the Greeley Gas fernery. stated they are more concerned with farm taps. They come off u. the transmission line, set a meter at the fence line and then run 8/3/71 671 931061 APR 1 '53 14':+1 FROM WELD CO TREASURER TO 1832476;, PAOE.013/017 ISSUE CERTIFICATE NUMBER 26 SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL SITE - WELD COUNTY LANDFILL RANGE 66, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, SECTION 32s WWN} & SE}SW}s BE IT RESOLVED, by the Sorrd of County Commissioners, Weld county, Colorado, that in accordance with nrovisioas of the Colorado Waste Disposal Site and Facilities Act, Chapter 358, Colorado Session Laws of 1967, the Board hereby grants to Earl Moffat dba Sanitary Landfill, Certificate Number 26. The above and foregoing resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the foilowin9 votes AYE s • d c. NAY ! Ct :. - i t -4 . d L c tj. AYE DATED OCTOBER 6, 1971 THE HOARD Or COUNTY COfC4ISSIONER5 WELD COUNTY, COLORADO MB 37s I.NR 187 931061 TO 18324463 PAPE.014/01 APR 1 '93 14'✓1 FROM WELD CO TREASURER C----- '- 'J•;IIIt GREEL to O'oci„g lairs NOTICE wsilbe Ladd 1a' lam. running to the =dog law, of [fths B°KO y G ale t .he State of Colorado, a pubik Oaouto.Wreld Oro-} : oaring will be hold in the Oilier del ado �� „ ,pea cf the Board of Caumty Commie/leg. s mod l toners of Weld County, Colorado died. on persona pa A9pr9 Ael4 County Court Rouse. Gree-kinte eted � la stead am ey. Colorado at the ume spec- are rN :led All pwooe In sty Mama i :.ride • 1 !MY named a UW Sits Ap { , Si DOCKET No. tin • Weld Camay.LetdtIE Inc RpV 6es Eva .Sobrado P*T£_ &wraobor 12, inn Tlb>7i: 2:00 O'clock P. M. heard. Lanral. lue \ a requested to attend and may County art zwoos, Ca4u'& T A'fE: Saptes>s ' ?3. 1971 TOLE: 2:00 O'clock P. m. ow, Approval Raqueat: Site Approval for a udtas'y Land1DL ` The West ha} tf: Soutawest Iuartec MIL Sw%)' and the ioutbaau Q atey:of tha South' not Quartet' '(SEK SW%) of leaden 2h cy tQo tau, Sown• flip Five (s); North. Range +xtyaix GSM west of the ism IL. Weld County, Colora&• iabd: Augi* tiro* • The solao'OP • COUNTY COMMISmomeeS Nsl4 COUNTY, COLORADO By: ANN SPOMHR COUNTY CLERK AND • REGORDIR AND CLERK To ma 60ARb :Wished in 1% Oreeley,-igor• tuguut 20 and Servoendier 14 bf the State of Colorado, a public office of the Board of County urt House, Greeley, Colorado, at for aeons in any manner interested in Resat, ,eel to attend and may be heard. Sadtary The wend! is ors 1 the !µtams of t W Ati ttrtwo tot 'atis, le) tot sit age Sl> u., via Ca�Y, rpjorada ICE T Th, <sgII. 5 wag Quarter Town' Data& Aogeet m' tin west Ike BOA" OF _COUtOUiSSIONER5 t wdtoNTY• coLORADD SOt\ ly: ANN 5P°1#4 Set, COUNTY CLERit S$ RECORDER ANo ATEDs WELD COUNTY T.ANN:I L. INC_ BOX 596 F.VANS, COLORADO kt A SANITARY LANDFILL I cat Quarter (WiSW}) end the sthweat Quarter (SE4SW}) of mohip Five (5) North, Range loth P. 1I., Weld County, Colorado. } Tb dusky Boor A CLi:RK to The BOAeO A NA 7.M"".___ILI, It: 1071 �...1 Publish in the Greeley Booster August 20 IL September 10, 1971 THE BOARD CF COUNTY COI94ISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO BY* ANN SPOMER COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER AND CLERK TO THE SOAK �r• 931061 APR 1 '93 14'32 FROM WELD CO TPrASURER TO 1632446; PACE.O1;re17 1C,AROWSKY, WITWER & OLDENBURG O. RECF WED SEP 22 1971 ~� I I)1121R3i6! GWML. A. KAnOWOKY Yew -. w,1Mt,4 /4. R. sea el nw vnO September 22. 39'11 Weld County Commissioners Weld County Court'louse Greeley, Colorado 80631 Gentlemen: suns a,O.AN* n+ vrr tw,LmwO ILACCLAY. QOLOOAOO seat sae *Oa M w.w,<t, It has come to the attention of certain residents of Dos Rios. Inc.. a Subdivision of Weld County, Colorado, that a Rearing is to be held today before you concerning the Application of Weld County Land Fill, Ino. , for a Special Use Permit in cunuecLlun with the West Half of the Southwest Quarter and the Southeast Quarter of the South- west Quarter of Section 32, Township b North, Range 66 West of the 6th P. M.. Evidently the Application is to obtain permission to use the land above described for a Sanitary Land Fill. Dos Rios Subdivision lies adjacent to the above described land, but for reasons which tho roeidunto cannot explain, they were totally unaware of the fact that an application had been made for the purpose described above and that the Planning Commission has apparently acted on the Application favorably. To the best of my knowledge from the information available, no individual resident of Dos Rios has ever received a Notice of any kind concerning the Application. I think it is necessary to bring to your attention that under the Official Zoning Re- solution of WeIJ County under Section 311, Paragraph 3.3 ('4) concerns itself with land fills and Indicates the necessity for a Special Use Permit. Procedural Guide adopted by the County effective March 15, 1971, provides in Paragraph (1) (g) the Apj,jicatien shoat be signed by tho Fee Owner. 27to Foe Owner in this 3nntnnoc -is Dos Rios, Inc. and I am advised that Dos Rios, Inc. has not signed said Application. It would therefore appear that the Board of County Commissioners is without juris- diction to consider the Application or to grant it. It is the intention of the residents to attack the validity of the Permit if it should be grnnted. Thy way of general information, the residents of boo Rios feel badly imposed upon in view of the fact that of fairly recent date they have been burdened with the proxi- mity of Muufurt'u new feedlot and the Hill 'N Park sewage lagoon. Adoption of the 931061 APR 1 '9: 14,;x2 FROM WELD CO TREASURER TO 192446 PAOE.016/017 Mr. Dewlaps called the meeting to order. SUBJECT: Lend Fill DISCUSSION: Mr. Lorensoe stated a been received from Mr. Karoweky stating there ar au pr,)c.Uures. one is by the County Comiii ssiceors whic.] is e County I icenee for Waste Disposal site and one is an apeleetio3 for a Special Use Permit which the: Planning Co,wtissic . :'.:quires applicant to complete which is in that categc;:y. ee asked whicn one he is to use. Mr. Karowsky felt en epplication to the Planning Commission should have been used In •the case of a sanitary land fill &polled Tor by Ear; ':ioffat„ who is not the tuner of the property in question. pie e nc ,.t,..r;;ission cpptica'ticn re- quires the notarized signetura of the owner or aUti]OriZeu agent of the property. It was agreed by the Planning Commission that en application for a sanitary landfill should go through the • procedures required of other Special Use Permits. SUZJcCT: Road'cor.'tract far tit 1lowco �ubdirisi.ar, DISCUSSION: Mr. Loreasoe stewed - p �' �. ..,..:r 1rN:,; J�•.ii .:CLtChLr.5, att4r: for Willowood Subdivision, r2yard lg a subdivisioe improvement agreement rather than bonding. This could be an agreement to take care of the' curb. .gutter, sidawelks and street improvements/ Mr. Anderson Stilted this 'is all r.:;t eperOVed lout end they need a bonafide contract for the improvements. Mr. Lorenson read thra proposed contract. t ttar r.?f?rod to Mr. 1-i:lop. SU JECT: Agricultural council DISCUSSION: Mr. Lorenson stated he ed met with the Acricuiter;i • Council. They would li.'Ce to d4 cees the maze -up oT the'Planeir Commission, and were told on the approval of the Planning Com- mission, they could attend a Planning Commission meeting and discuss their problems. Mr. Anderson suggested a copy of the. proposed "A" zoning amendment be sent to the members of the council. SUBJECT: Comprehensive Plan - progress report DISCUSSION; Hr. Lorenson reported the consultant hat• begun on the housing study in both Counties. The Planning Commission has provided a good bit of informction and he is now waiting .'or census tapes. Jim Ohl and the two interns will start housin inspections. Reports will be submitted to each -community on how they are to handle their housing problem. Some meetings be scheduled with F.H.A. They know likely sources for funds housing in the smaller communities- Aa analysis has been m: all subdivisions, showing the amount of acreage, the number parcels, average size etc. This type of information is bei qulred by the state Land Use Comcaissiun. Meeting adjourned. AYYLICANT: Weld County Landfill. Inc. % el —V- eil/ CASE NUM3ER: SUP 0116 RtSOLUTION: By Board of County Commissioners to grant the site approval. Dated 10/6/71 Res>ectfuily submitted, Dorothy l t,, Soc. 9aio&i • .. _... "••.{w /et- i '(.W d.i.11,1 i.• August 13, 1911 Mr. Glenn K. Billings, Chairman Weld County Commissioner, County Courthouse Greeley, Colorado 80631 Dear Mr. lillingat RE: Engineering Design end operation of a proposed sanitary Landfill The report on the proposed site has been reviewed by this department. )Sr. Earl Moffat made a valid point in his letter concerning the preparation of the required engineering report ,xior to assurance the site would be designated by the County Commissioners. The information presented and a site visit by members of the deportment and Mr. Moffat indicate this to be a suitable site, It is recommended the site location be approved and the designation be made contingent upon the submittal of an engineering report concerning the design and operation of the site as described in Regulation 3 and 4 of the attached proposed rsgulatioas. Some of this woe included in the information submitted. If there are any questions or if we can be of further assistance feel free to contact this department at your convenience. Very truly yours, William N. Gnhr, Director Division of Engineering & Sanitation WWG:OfS:tw EXHIBIT 04.0.-3 931061 COLo:uwo DEPARTMENT or REALT;l 4210 E. 11th Avenue Denver, CO 80220 REGULATIONS: SOLID YAST; 3 DISPOSAL SITES PEED FACILITIES Chapter 3, Article 23, COS 1557 (1257 P_:r:. CUu. Supp.) as mounded by Chanter :03, Colonclo Session Lars 1971. The follow*ng _;;alatio'.,s were ..optc6 by The Co1orao State )3or.rd oZ :;ec.'irh par:a.;cnt to Cc?.o.cdo Rcvisc.0 Stat•.itca 1`63, Section 3••R-.2 as......n::]ri, and C`.::''cr 36, Article 2S, C2S 1963 (LJo/ . Yen:. Cum. Suppr) ;) .. .;;oiled by ChGn;:rvr 103, Colorado Session Laws 197.1, ft_ tee dc:silration, optr;ccicn, cad dcsinn of Solid ::.see Din_.o:;[:i Sites and Faciiitiaa. Adopted Frhr.cry .1Q ;.9i? Effective 1)te Anvil ;, 1'572 Sac•.tion I. SCo=':S Those re,cuiecios shall hc applicable to all solid trice dispo: a1 .sites and faciiitiec, c:h2t'hcr des i; acted by ord.',n :nee within the corporate limits o2 any city, city and county, or incorporated town or by the Board of County Coy:aissionc;rs in unincorporated ,areas. Section 2. R"ri:?1T:e:s (1) The collo,:i;. deCinitiens cctracted from Section 36-23-1, CRS 1963, as cmcndcd, shall apply vhcn appcazirig in these regulations: a. "Solid caches" r,ttcs garbage, reft'sc, sludge of sewage disposal plants, and other discarded solid raterials, including solid T Q waste materials resulting from industrial, eo._.crcial and from cornunity acti.'ttics, but shsl.l not include agricultural waste. b. "Departu..nt" means the Eepartmant of Health, c. "Approved site or fai.iity" means a site or facility for which a "Certificate of Designation" h.::: bocci obtai.n_J, ac provided 9431061 j• d. "Mining wastes" are either mill -tailings or metallurgical slag or both. e. A "junk automobile" is defined to be the hulk or body of a motor vehicle essentially suitable only for one use as scrap metal. Junk automobile parts constitute the normally recyclable materials obtainable from a motor vehicle, f. "Suspended solid;:" are finely divided mineral and organic sub- stances contained in the sewage existing in a sewage sy.=tem. g. "Enginac::ing data" ;hall Ls..n information area da_cri.bi z::� the of disposal sites in acres, a description of the access reads and roads within the site, a description of fencing enclosing the disposal site, and overall plan listing the method or ,.-•thods cv which the disposal site will be filled it_ refuse ana the uac to which it will be placed once the site is filled and c1o:;_J. h. ,,..o:ogical data" shall mean classes of soil Co a reasonable depth fro:;: the ground surface, the location end thickness of the significant soil classifications throughout the area of the site and to extend some distance beyond the boundaries off the site, to include information on ground water elevations, seepage quantities and water wells 1,000 feet beyond the boundary of the disposal site. i. "Hydrological data" shall include average, maximum, and minimum Amounts of precipitation for each month of the year, surface drainage facilities, streams and lakes adjacent to the disposal site, irrigation water ditches adjacent to the site, wells, streams and lakes, "Operational data" shall include a plan for overall supervision of the disposal site to include supervisory poi -soars? rnd Labe: 931061 in this -act. d. "Person" means an individual, partnership, private or municipal corporation, firm, or other association of persons. e. "Solid waste disposal" means the collection, storage, treatment, utilization, processing, or final disposal of solid wastes. f. "Solid waste disposal site and facility" ..,sans the location and facility at which the deposit and final treatment of solid wastes occur. "Transfer station" means a facility at which refuse, awaiting transportation to a disposal site, as transferred free one zyr.-• of collection vehicle and placed into c.notlier. h. "Recyclable materials" -means a typo of ;,aerial that is subject to reuse or recycling. i. "Recycling operation" moans that part of solid waste diznob" facility or a part of a general disposal, facility at which recyclable materials may be separated from other materials for future processing. Definitions. (2) Other tern:; used in the statute or regulations are defined as follows: - a. "Certificate of Designation" means a document issued under authority of the Board of County Commissioners to a person operating a solid waste disposal site and facility of a certain type and at a certain location. b. "11i11-tailings"arc that refuse material resulting from the processing of ore in a mill. c. "Metallurgical slag" is the cinder or dross waste product resulting in the refining of metal bearing ores. S- 931061 d. "Mining wastes" are either mill -tailings or cntallurgical slag or both. e. A "junk; automo,iLc" is defined to be the hulk or body of a notor vehicle essentially suitable: only for one use as scrap metal. Junk automobile parts constitute the normally recyclable materials obtainable from a motor vehicle. Susper,d^o solids" ace finely divided mineral and organic sub- stances contained in the sewage existing in a sewage syaten. "Engineering data" shall m_nn information deacribitta the arcs of disposal rites in acres, a description of the access roads and roads within the site, a description of lancing enclosing the disposal site, and overall plan listing the method or ^-•thcds sy which the disposal site will. be " 'ed 7ith refuse a a the us- so which it will be placed once the site is filled and cLos_d, "geological d:.;tc" shall mann classes of soil to a reasonable depth from the ground surface, tha location and thickness o: the significant soil classifications throughout the area of the site and to extend sonde distance beyond the boundaries of the site, to include information on ground water elevations, seepage quantities and water wells 1,000 feet beyond the boundary of the disposal site. i. "Hydrological data" shall include average, maximum, and minimum amounts of precipitation for each month of the year, surface drainage facilities, streams and lakes adjacent to the disposal site, irrigation water ditches adjacent to the site, wells, streams and lakes. "Operational data" shall include a plan for overall supervision of the disposal clic to include supervisory ;ersonrst end 931061 g • h. _4_ personnel, ec.2ipment and e_,chinery consisting of all item; needed for satisfactory landfill operation, traffic control, fire conntrel, cover material, working face, moisture content, compaction ^.trot, and rodent and insect control. k. "Sanitary Iadfill" is the final disposal of solid waste on the land by a ..-:hod employini, compaction of the refuse and covering with earth Dr other inert material. 1. A "co.,posti: plant" is a solid waste disposal facility utilizing t t bi.och, ical gradation to chancje decosposahle portions of solid waste to a c_ —us -like material. m. "Inc:incrati--. is the controlled co:;:bast-ion of solid, Iiouid or gaseous changing them to g seo and to a _c:iducc containing little com't:_i.b_e material. n. "Hazardous __._trial and toxic sub.:tances" are liquid or solids which can br- _ancerous to can, aniac-.1 and plant life unless properly nee.:rzlized. o. "Minims,. Stan_ards" (See Section 3) shall :.-,can the recuirements which shall.'__ applied to all solid waste disposal sites and facilities. "Engineering -,-port Design Criteria" (Sec Section 4) shall mean the minimum ra:,uirer,•ents which shall be applied to new facilities proposed for cs_gnation as a solid waste disposal site and facility. Section 3. D!l;1Xl": ST.\';^•,7.DS (1) (a) the toilo inc miaimxt standards are p• hereby adopted and incorporated herein as directed by Section 36-23-10 1963, as amended: (b) Such site and facilities shall be located, operated, and main - 931061 CDS tatned in a manner so as to control obno.•ious odors, prevent rodent and insect breedine, and i;fetati.oa, and shall be kept adequately covered during their use. (c) Such sites and facilities ,,.all comply with the health laws, standards, rules and reculations of the Depaitnu^nc, the Air Pollution Control Commission, the ;cater Pollution Control and a1_ applicab_s Corrrar�.:ia-;, � zoning laws and ordiances. (d) No radioactive materials or materials cunt::•,Lnated by radio- active substance; shall be disposed of in sires or facilities not speci- fically designated for that purpose. (e) A site and facility operated as a sanitary Lendi1i shall provide rr._ans of finally disposing of solid :antes on lend in a rv:nner• to minimize nusia nee conditions such as odors, windblown debris, insects, rodents, smoke, and shall provide compacted fill material, adequate cover with suit - able material and surface drainage designed to prevent pending and water and wind erosion; prevent water and sir pollution and, upon being filled, shin be left in a condition of orderliness, good esthetic appearance and capable of blending with the surrounding area. In the operation of such a sire and facility, the dolid wanes shall be distributed in the smallest area consistent with handling traffic to be unloaded, shall be placed in the most dense volume_ practicable using moisture and compaction or ocher method approved by the Department, shall be fire, insect and rodent resistant through the appli- cation of an adequate layer on inert material at regular intervals and shall have a minimum of windblown debris which shall be' collected regularly and placed into the fill. (f) Sites and facilities shall be adequately fenced so as to pre -nt waste rnaterit.1 and debris from escaping therefrom, and material and debris 931061 shall not be allowed to accumulate along the fence line. (g) Solid caster: deposited at any site or facility shall not be burned, provided, however, that in extreme emergencies resulting in the generation of large quantities of combustible materials, authorization far burning under controlled conditions r:ny be given by :the Department. Section 4. Il'ZI:TErISG Yai:'G2T DI;STG. CP.T.TSgTA a. The design of a solid waste disposal facility hereinafter designated shall be such as to protect surface and subsurface waters from contamination. Surface water frcm outside the immediate working area of the disposal site shall not be allowed to flow into or through the active disposal Area. The design shall provide for the deflection of rain or malting 5nt:, away from the active area where wastes are being deposited. As filling continues to completion, the surface shall be sloped so that water is diverted away from the area where refuse has been or is being deposited. The design shall include methods of keeping ground water out of the area where refuse is deposited. ,b. The site shall be designed to protect the quality of water available in nearby wells. The necessary distance from the wells is dependent in part on the direction of flow of ground under the site and the means used in the design to prevent precipitation falling on the site from reaching the equifier in question. Soil characteristics. The soil used for covering of landfill type operations shall have enough adhesive character- istics to permit a workable earth cover. c. The location of the solid waste site And facility should provide for convenient access from solid waste generation centers. x•' -?,F, 931061 d. The access routes shall be designed so as to permit the orderly and efficient flew of traffic to and from the sire as well as on the site. Traffic control routes on the site shall permit orderly, cf�? ric. ..c t and safe ingress, unloading and egress,' e. The design facility of c Y sisall provide for effective compaction and cover of refuse rc.cria'_s in such a program as will prevent the emergence or attraction or insects and rodents. f. Solid wastes deposited at disposal sites and facilities shal l be compacted to prior to cove< ring. Use o, moisture or change of particle size to aid in compaction is recon;reseed. The design shall contcmpate the location and construction of the disposal site and facility in such a manner as will eliminate the scattering of windblown debris. All solid wastes discharged at the site shall be confined to the site and any material escaping from the active discharge area shall be promptly retrieved and placed in the active discharge area. h. Recycling operations may be designed to operate at solid waste disposal sites and facilities, provided such recycling operations do not interfere with the disposal of other wastes and provided that such recycle operations are carried out without creation of a nusianec and rodent and insect breeding. g• i• The design shall include such equipment and operational methods to prevent the buruing of solid wastes at the site and to extinguish any fires. 931061 Final Closure. Prior to closing a solid waste, disposal site except for cause at set forth in Section 36-23-13 CRS as amended, the final cover of the dapnsitcd solid wastes shall Je • graded to the elevations which shall be shown in the initial design. The cover :hall be of such thickness and material as will prevent the entrance or ernrg?nce of insects, rodents, or odors. Such closure elevations shall be such as will provide for the diversion of rainfall and runoff :rsay from the fill area. k. A plan and method for protecting solid waste(: disposal sites £aci:.'.ities against damage from floods shall be a part of the engineering design. Section 5. TSE REPO'tT OF T115: DEPA"T�,,,;-r to _ •-County Ce::.�issio;:ers or r.�nict;.�_ officials, recommending approval or disapproval o: the application, app icatior,, shall consist of a written and signed document made in accordance with criteria established by the Board of Health, Water Pollution Control Commission and Air Pollution Control Commission. Section 6. OPERATION OF A SOLID WASTE DIL? OS\L FACILITY An operational plan for placing into operation the engineering desi: for the disposal site and facility is required.. Such a plan shall include the foiiowi.n- information:; a. The name or titles of the person or persons who will be in charge of the disposal site and facilit;. Such name(s) shall be of person(s) having the responsibility for the operation as well as the authority to take all corrective act ion necessary co comply with the requirements of this Deportment. p rtr.:CnC. b. JThe list of equipm..;;nt to be used at the disposal site. C. The hours of operation of the tile. 931061 d. The fire fighting equip; -.gent or Ceartmcnt available for extinguishing fires. c. The frequency of cover of the deposited wastes. f. The freq._ency of retrieval of wind blown debris. g. A contingency plan for eradication of rodents and insects. h. Procedures for impier..anting other aspects of the design. Section 7. RI:ST7,ICIT0NS OF 6..T'..TI0 S, C?LS1C SITS a. In the event a person applying for a Cer_ificstc of Designation does not wish to receive at his site all items defined in the statute as solid wastes, his application to the county commissiotcra for approval of designation shall snt forth the limitations as to materials to he accepted at site. If such site is thereafter designated, the owner shall erect at the entrance to such a site an appropriate design setting forth the items not receivable at such site. b. If a person having a site officially designated wishes to close the site for any reason, he shall inform the county commissioners at least 60 days in advance of such closing and shall post a sigh:, readable from the scat of an entering motor vehicle, informing the public of his intent to close such site. Such site shall be considered officially closed upon receipt of an official notice from the county commissioners, provided such closing date shall be at least 60 days after the notice to the county commissioners and the posting as above set forth. Upon closing of the site, the owner shall post a notice that the site is closed and shall take reasonable precautions to prevent the further use of such 331061 -10 - Add Section E. N(.tifieaticu of :violations of Ia Annaoved En F;.00rC (a) Whenever the De;Nar!rr nt determines that a solid waste disposal site is no:: being operated snbsL(:ntra)ly in accordance with te crite is provided is the Lnineering Dc; igo deport or regulations, the operator shall be i.-afore the — - of r,�a nature of of the al lc vole tio:: by certified it and within ten day:. fro:a and after receipt of the letter of citation, he y request a variance from. the . ^.gin-..- ing .-sign Report by ..._.._ written ap,,ticani.on to the Deprirtr^nt stating the grounds for such request. (5) The Depertent shall either approve such t reques _ or schedule the matter for en administrative hearing. If the operntor fails to request _ variance, or the Bcpsrt-rrn' • -� - refuses to grant a variance after the hearing, the operator shall be deemed to be in violation of the law and these regulations and the "Certificate_ of Designation" shall be subject to cas?ensLas, revocation or injunction as provided in Sections 36-23.13 tt 14, CRS 1903, as amended by Chapter 103, Colorado o_oraco Session Laws 19/1. The Department shall pro,!,.•_• action he "} report the taken to the Board of County Coc_,:issioners. (c) Any person aggrieved by the decision of the Department c r.tment may request a hearing before the State Board of Health and shall be afforded his right to judicial review as provided in Section 66-1-13, Coloraco :,•_vise.'. Statutes 1963. Note These regulations rescind and supersede solid t.•a::te regulations and standards adopted November 21, 1967. Effective January 1, 196°. 931961 ASHTON-DANIELS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION EXHIBITS April 5, 1993 Before The Weld County Commissioners In the Matter of the Central Weld County Landfill 1. 7-16-71 Colorado Department of Health Division of Engineering and Sanitation Activity Report. 2. 7-21-72 Letter to the Weld County Planning Commission from the Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners (Weld County, Colorado). 3. 8-13-71 Letter to Glenn K. Billings, Chairman -Weld County Commissioners, from William N. Gahr, Director, Division of Engineering & Sanitation. 4. Colorado Department of Health Memo: Regulations - Solid Wastes Disposal Sites and Facilities; Effective 3-1-72. 5. Petition to County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado from Weld County Resident in the Vicinity of Central Weld Landfill. 6. Transcript of Tape of Hearing on September 22, 1971 before the Weld County Board of Commissioners on Central Weld Landfill. 7. Memorandum of Hearing, 9-22-71, Tape 99, Docket #54. Petitioner's Name: Weld County Landfill, Inc., Box 596, Evans, Colorado. 8. 10-6-71 Resolution of Weld County Board of Commissioners Approving Issuance of Certificate of Designation to Weld County landfill, Inc. 9. 10.6-71 Certificate of Designation / Solid Waste Disposal Site. 10. 7.2-80 Letter to Board of Weld County Commissioners from Albert J. Haile, Colorado Department of Health. 11. July, 1980 Results of Solid Waste Facility Inspection at Central Weld Landfill (then the Greeley -Milliken Landfill). 12. 7-30-80 Letter to Weld County Board of County Commissioners from Albert J. Haile Noticing Potential for Water Contamination at Central Weld Landfill (then the Greeley -Milliken Landfill). 13. 7-17-92 Letter to Kennedy/Harbert/Lacy/Kirby/Webster, Weld County Board of County Commissioners from Samuel S. Telep. 931061 14. 9-11-92 Letter to Kennedy/Harbert/Lacy/Kirby/Webster, Weld County Board of County Commissioners from Kent E. Hanson. 15. 9-18-92 Letter to John Pickle (Weld County Dept. of Health) and Ms. Austin Buckingham (Colorado Dept. of Health) from Waste Management of North America, Inc. 16. 9-28-92 Letter to Waste Services Corp. from Weld County Board of Commissioners Requesting Submittal of Operations Plan. 17. Same as Exhibit No. 16. 18. 10.5-92 Letter to Bill Hedberg, Waste Services Corp. from Weld County Dept. of Health and Copy of Minimum Standards Regulations. 19. 10-7-92 Letter to Bill Hedberg, Central Weld Sanitary Landfill from Weld County Dept. of Health Outlining Recommendations to Avoid Water Contamination. 20. 10-16-92 Letter to Kennedy,/Harbert/Lacy/Kirby/Webster, Weld County Board of County Commissioners from Kent E. Hanson. 21. 11-14-92 Letter to Glen Mallory, Colorado Dept. of Health Recommending Denial of Discharge Permit to Waste Services, Inc. 22. 12-14-92 Letter to Pam Nelson, Colorado Dept. of Health. 23. 12-11.92 Letter to Victor H. Sainz, P.E., Colorado Dept. of Health, from Waste Management of North America, Inc. 24. 12-22-92 Letter to Bill Hedberg and Alan Scheer, Waste Services Corporation, from Colorado Department of Health. 25. 12-23-92 Memo To File from Linda Johnson (Weld County Colorado) RE: Contaminated Soil Complaint -Central Welds.andfill. 26. 1-4-92 Memo to Chuck Cunliffe (Planning Dept. -Weld Co.) from John Pickle Outlining Violations at Central Weld landfill. 27. 1-8-92 Memo to Chuck Cunliffe (Planning Dept -Weld Co.) from John Pickle Outlining Violations at Central Weld Landfill. 28. 1-14-93 Letter to Bill Hedberg, Waste Services Corporation, from Weld County Dept. of Health Noticing Waste Services of Violations of the Solid Waste Disposal Act. 29. 1.18-93 Letter to Waste Services, Inc. from Weld County Dept. of Planning 931061 Services Noticing Waste Services of Violations of Conditions of Approval. 30. 1-18-93 Letter to Connie Harbert (Chairperson -Weld County Commissioners) from Greg Hobbs Requesting Hearing for Revocation of Central Weld Landfill's Certificate of Designation. 31. 2-15-93 Letter to Harbert/Cunliffe/Shelton/David from Greg Hobbs. 32. 2-22-93 Memo to Chuck Cunliffe (Planning Dept -Weld Co.) from John Pickle Outlining Violations at Central Weld Landfill. 33. 3-2-93 Letter to Waste Services Corp. from Weld County Dept. of Planning Services Noticing Probable Cause Hearing. 34. 3-10.93 Memo to File from Trevor Jiricek (Solid & Hazardous Waste Specialist, Weld County, Colorado) RE: Central Weld Sanitary Landfill - Complaint. 35. 3-30-93 Memo to Chuck Cunliffe (Planning) from John Pickle (Health) RE: Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. 36. Photo 37. Photo 38. Photo 39. Photo 40. Tape of Original Hearing on September 22, 1971 before the Weld County Board of Commissioners on Central Weld Landfill. 41. 4-3-93 Statement of Glenn K. Billings, Former Chairman of Weld County Commissioners. 42. 4-3-93 Statement of Albion Carlson, Environmental Scientist with the State of New Mexico Environment Department. 43. September, 1975 "Evaluation of Existing Sanitary Landfills in Weld County as Hazardous Waste Disposal Sites.' 44. 1979 U.S.G.S. Map Showing Depth to the Water Table in the Boulder -Fort Collins - Greeley Area. 45. 6-10-81 E.P.A. 'Notification of Hazardous Waste Site' Naming Weld County Landfill as a Hazardous Waste Site. 931061 >: TEE COUNTY COiuJTSSIONERS OF WELD COU1dTY, COLOIZAD0 Wad County Court house ri_iaoy, t%Oio^:iir/ c.;J0til We, the ui uer:a. ned residents of Weld County, Colorado, being mivi:u!u !' an ;application being filed for permission to open n l:1'ULil]_ dump on Tie West Half of the Southwest Quarter (U3 SW)1) and the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter �_ c••ri� r� ( 1:,��, .,tl,•,) of Section Thirty—two 2}, Township Pve (`.5) North, Range Siyty—six U)) Went of the uL i-.M., Yc]d County, Color.:do, do petition yea as follows: 1. ,wit you t.efuse any permit for y landfill dump on the or the Southwet .2:it•ter• (SEi Safi:) of nnid tcti.on 7.0.• the reason that there appears to be no test of i;iI the SEA SS Of :aid Section 32; that said /IO acre ;.:, dt1jn.uent to a north -south county road; is very close to the 0.ili:c, main hi[;hi•tay running to Greeley from Milliken and will. depreci•'i;e the value of other lands in the neighborhood. 2. That if ;+ permit is granted to open a landfill dump on the West hn I f of the Southwest Quarter (aa! S\*) of said Section 32, the following conditions be incorporated in the granting; of such pctitioa: a. That the north —south county road leading to the dump site be blacktopped prior to the opening of the dump; b. That the road leading from the county road to the dump be blacktopped before the opening of the dump; c. That the operrabor of she cutup erect a screen of uaven wire along*, the south side and the east side of ^aid dump area to catch all trash and paper that might blow from the dump and that said operator, be required to clean the n:. reen at least once monthly. In 1,19 event litter and trash EXHIBIT IA.D,-S. 9c1061 from the dump area blows over onto other lands in the vicinity, that the dump operator be required to clenn up said area= regularly, at least monthly or oftener. d. That the streambeds in the draws adjacent to the dump area be protected from pollution from dump materials and that said draws be free of obstructions at all times. c. That the County Commissioners require a periodic inspection of the dump premises by a licensed sanitarian, weekly or oftener; f. That said application for opening of a landfill dump in the West Half of the Southwest Quarter (414 SW4) be re- stricted to that part of said West Half of said Southwest Qtvirtcr lying east of ;l stre:mbed which traverses in a north -to -South direction through the West Half of the Southwest Quarter (LP,`. SW.) of said Section 32, and that nnid dump in no way interfere with the water from the stream - bed entering into or leaving an irrigation reservoir located en eleven (11) acres in the Southwest corner of the South- west Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (StJjd S'.1.) of said Section 32; r'. That the operators of the landfill dump be restric- ted from accepting for dumping any dead animals or effluent from septic tanks, and that at such time as the dump shall c:c to be used as a dump area, th:1t all trash and contents of the dump be covered and levelled for agricultural or building uses. !i. That the County Commissioners take such other pre- cautions :Is may be necessary and required to preserve the —2- 9241061 47!2/ZL. f;l�"lTi i11h:!.r, "''TIit}}Iry conclitiortr; ('tN1 [)ropuf y V•I.�.L•• 1.1' .16 .7.peei'. rut ll.y •:1ibmi.1Ut,r;i 7 Der r:'ur)t:ioil: 1 f/z::/ L r H., /fez ,nin-..4%t, ,, ). Tom_ -1J �fd..�.,,,,,,.,,tk , Ti .L Li .i. E J (//- L /_ALL. / 'A i-i ifAii n4 Pit -LS -- n ;c', � C � ,Cz . t i , lizithen t _i.. .IY.. IJ //azu ,a C--1) z ; 11 i1-41--'/ 11h -t... • /4'L'' L L#7 �CIlic�tr _ ? 71 „/.i'4-tft Miixrup J✓1 J • is-- - �G .7")_ s' - F: G 5/- s- " .1. se•[.G •7. .7 ,7 re SI ≤. 7l'•l�.,t. , . 2 - .C ( 7k4zA' 9--•1061 cleanliness, sanitary conditions and property value in the neighborhood. Date: i -,7 7! Names Address I Respectfully submitted, Section Description: ;re 4/ //terrr'te C\ ' .i) y-.ar .,"7 g 'Jos 9 ' n0 _VI S/S / f/ cc 1zEiCi -9‘03-83al 7 , (JJ;4 tc G r J '/{c- A/ �4�. yyy'1 z /( ` i Vii;//r 2/ t altagimma samommiliweemoro �� , I 174 ,• I &C.) \ I/5.2 ifz '51-4415-- .;/3 (4 4 c. sr .\s,11 i y /id 5'3 3 '1/5:.;4- '17,"2",-L..1 j,.....,$ .-,i- 1 i L-,,e..c? J' C.'.11.. ,1 r! 14 Jn1 +47 n, �- JI 4L tom✓,<�.f iwr-�>-r1, `jy.I x ,0 .%%i< /P • %,e47c G.f AN, c TA .is -741:17) faLi p7 -51 -no J7 - 5.r GC.. 32-S` nIGG, 2301-s- /gG� Jo137 -5- - 6b 3o -s -R46 Town: xelif,"117;;;, 7 '1•A (I 3.3.,S76 -.L 4'4 frig/ 31676 C'i^ N L ,I :'I .2-2- 7 G Sr--' S1,/'., ?e ile{5✓ 4; t( . _e 3,2•C_LG �Yrfy4<-6 931061 HEARINGS September 22� 1971 77 NAny: Weld County Landfill, Inc. Box 596 3 ACDRESS: Evans, Colorado DATE FIRST HEARD: /-4:7-` ,/ / / '"-'-.' i:1:7;_ - Site approval for a sanitary landfill kt:n.•,Iyo of Zone) or in ac e •i (Land Use Permit) Ai. D:Sc1..s ION: 4 of the SW}, Sejswj-of Section 32, Township 5, Range 66 �T I' Ayains.:L :1 �•••r) .',.3- 7, • a.._. r,,, , .1 ., - • . • r� .. At-) %,,)i ii' • �.CI' L • La/C4 .•: �:•.r ,'•.e.' 7 t:frJ�:P•//�,I,J .•e: • //dam .7 et: ft r 'f_ rj �/.;-? fn. 931061 Transcript of Tape on 1971 County Hearing Central Weld Landfill We'll call this Hearing to order. Docket No. 54 Weld Landfill Incorporated, Box 596, Evans, Colorado Date: September 22nd, 1971. Time: 2 o'clock Request site approval for sanitary landfill At this time Mr. Connell you will read the record. C i C v s C Y Q S ===== = a v z' 9 Connell: Mr. Chairman, pursuant to notice properly given pursuant to the zoning laws of the of State of Colorado, a Public Hearing is now held in the offices of the Board of County Commissioners, Weld County, Colorado, the Weld County Courthouse, concerning Docket No. 54, Application of Weld County Landfill Incorporated, Lots S96, Evans, Colorado. Hearing does come on at this time and date as published. Publication has been had in accordance with law in the Greeley Daily Booster as shown by the Certificate of Publication of the publisher of the Greeley Daily Booster. The request is for site approval for a sanitary landfill located in the west 1/2 of the SW 1/4 in the EXHIBIT I A-. 0. - 1 931061 SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 32 Township 5N Range 66W of the Sixth P.M. Notice has been properly given to the adjoining land owners as evidenced by the Certificate of Certified Mail and the receipt thereof for HTK [King], First National Bank of Greeley, Colorado, Elmer Knister Weld County Landfill, Guy A Shable. Said mailing to Guy A. Shable was returned to this office by the United States Post Office. Henry Wagner, Ella Spomer, and, again, the First National Bank. Matter comes on now for hearing. Certain of those present are shown to be represented by counsel. These should be identified in the process of the hearing. Those not represented by counsel should be duly noted. Chairman: This time, Mr. Moffatt, if you can present your case. Do you have anything to say regarding this landfill site? Moffatt: No, only that we went through all the necessary requirements that we know of, and we are here to answer any questions anybody might want to ask us and see if there is anything we can do; anything anybody wants to know. Chairman: Has this been approved by the County Health Department and the State Water Pollution Safety...? Moffatt: We've contacted all the various people we knew; out there, and there's been new law 2 32,1061 Connell: brought on the 1st, I believe there are some statutes, effective, I believe, July that's right, and it was so new that things in this that really even the State Health Department didn't have full data on them. So we met with the Health Departments of the County and the State and went over it, and we met all the things that they knew of, and we agreed in principle on anything that they might want really you can't spend all of all the answers that this new we accepted to do, and the money it takes to get law requires until you get into know i£ you have this site or not because you have to survey it, put in contour, you have to show, you have to prospect in there to see what type of formation. We have logs from the soil office which we are not including because they only went to a depth of approximately 4 or 5 feet. Then we did have a well log that covered 5 or 6 places that goes down quite a distance, but still that is small bore and we feel that before we could design the ground for final use we'd have to actually physically move dirt on it to see how we'd want to do it. But all of it can be done with sanction and approval from the various departments. Mr. Chairman, if I may interrupt. It might be noted this application has been before the Weld County Planning Commission and on recommendation of date August 4th, 1971, certification of August 3rd, 1971, 3 34111061 recorded in Book ill by the Secretary of the Weld County Planning Commission. RESOLUTION favorably recommending to the Board of County Commissioners the approval of this site location and approval. Chairman: Thank you. At this time we'll hear from the people supporting this application. All of you having anything to do with the cause, let's have your opinion. Voice 2: Yes Mr. Chairman. We, Weld County Health Department, approve of the site on the grounds that we figure it is well above the water level; we won't have any water problems at all, like we have down on the river. Also, it is within a quarter of a mile of a black top road and about a mile, that's from the south, with about a mile and three quarters from the north is the black top road. We have studied the engineering reports from the soils and from the well, record and log from the well, and, therefore, we recommend this application be approved. I have also Mr. Orville Stoddard from the Water Pollution Commission and I would like Mr. Stoddard to comment. Chairman: All right, that's fine with... Mr. Stoddard? Stoddard: Thank you. My name is Orville Stoddard with the Engineering Section of Colorado Department of Health. There is an Amended Act pertaining to the regulation of land disposal sites and facilities that Earl Moffatt 4 921061 mentioned. This requires the applicant to submit a report of engineering, geological, hydrological, and operational data to the Department for review and recommended approval prior to issue of the Certificate of Designation by the County Commissioners. The site was visited with Mr. Moffatt, Glen Paul of County Health Department, and at that time guidelines for developing this report were the Weld the reviewed with Mr. Moffatt. He did submit a report to the Department, August 9th, 1971, and did have considerable information of the type that we were after. The information submitted indicate after studying the soils reports, the test borings, information on the existing water table, soil conditions in the area, that this site can be operated in accordance with sanitary landfill requirements. Also, the Department is required to develop and promulgate rules and regulations pertaining to the engineering design and operation. These are to be presented to the Board of Health at their regular meeting in October for adoption. This is a suitable site and can be operated as a sanitary landfill. The only question we have at this point in time, and Mr. Moffatt touched on that, is that there are several alternatives in how the operation should proceed and this is just a matter of deciding which is the best way to go. 5 931061 Chairman: An operational problem? Stoddard: Right. Beg pardon? Chairman: An operational procedure that you.... Stoddard: Yes, that's right. Chairman: Is there anyone else here who wants to speak for the application? If not we'll hear from the people whose opposing the application. Waldo: Mr. Chairman, can we ask questions of the people that are supporting the application? Chairman: Now, if you want to go ahead and state your name and.... Waldo: My name is Ralph Waldo, Jr. and my father and I represent Mrs. Ella Spomer and Mr. and Mrs. (Henry) Wagner, who represent [ too]. They have obtained signatures on a petition opposing the landfill in the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4, that 40 acres, and then if you grant the permit for the West half of that 80 acres, the West 80 acres, that that be granted with a lot of provisions on it.... All right. ...that are contained in this Petition. We have 39 signatures, I believe, on the Petition. The people that have signed this Petition come from within a radius of about 2 miles, with 2 of them coming from Section 27, Township 5N, Range 66, which would be about 2-1/2 miles away. And I have here a chart that shows Chairman: Waldo: 6 931061 Moffatt: the location of the people that signed this Petition opposing this. We have no people that signed this that are clear away from there. And we have some questions that we would like to ask about this. The first one is "How much of this West half of the SW 1/4 and the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 would they use for a landfill operation?" Well, Ralph, like I explained a while ago, we're so bound down and so tight now by regulations, supervised by qualified engineers of the State, Norm Parson, that, sure there's nothing there that we can do that would be, that will make, a problem, but I cannot tell you exactly how much of that we will use until we get in and explore . If you have shale picked up and this and that in there it makes water pockets there'll be places in there, then we are going have to drain that dry; our intentions are to drain it. When we get through with them we intend to return it to a good piece of farm ground.And, to do so we don't know exactly until we do some pioneering in there. It costs a lot of money to use this dirt and if you're not going to use that, to move it you've got to figure out what your costs are going to be and you're bound to figure and see how it goes, and all I can assure you is that there's plenty of qualified people sitting on top of it, watching it to see it is done right; and our 7 331061 I intentions would be to go to the West line this side of water, where, and there's rules and regulations governing all that; you have to stay so many feet from the open water, and so forth in the new --it isn't quite even drawn up yet, is it, the law --and so water will be carried away and it will not be contaminated. ',All these things are covered by laws and I think that this will be asinine to bring them in right at this point.'\ Waldo: Moffatt: But we do intend to work the ground so that it would be possible to return some of it to farming before the whole thing would be filled.) And to do this we would have to work preferably on the west side, running north and to south, so that that ground can be turned back to agriculture probably much better than it was, it is now, because we would store the top soil and cover this other and then return the top soil on the ground. Don't let it kid you that it would be the worst thing in the north and south direction two sides. Now, now let me ask you a few questions, here. There is a draw which runs more or less north and south through there, curving, would you plan to do any landfill operations on the west side of that draw? We would if practical and if it doesn't interfere with any existing water rights or existing things that are there now. But you still have to determine if these things are practical or not and the only way you 8 921061 really can do that is to do some prospecting out there with equipment to see what, where this water underneath is seep water, and it comes from the shale and how you would handle it, you see. Waldo: Now who owns that land at the present time? Moffatt: We have an option on the land at the present time. Waldo: And Landfill, Inc. is going to buy it? Moffatt: And we will purchase that if it is approved. There is no other way that we can just run around and buy a piece of ground for $50,000 and then find out if it can be approved, you see. Waldo: Are you aware of the fact that Ella Spomer owns 11 acres in the SW 1/4 there? Moffatt: Oh, yes. It's an exception in the.... Waldo: Now, Moffatt: I don't think we'll be anywhere near that, Ralph, really, and I have -- I live across there, and I don't think we'll be anywhere.... We'll stop quite a ways this side of it. From what you're saying is that its going way to to bottom SW 1/4, right? Waldo: Yes, Moffatt: No. Waldo: and it takes water from that draw that comes down from there. Moffatt: We don't intend to get into that draw and work into that draw, unless there's water coming from this 9 921061 Waldo: Moffatt: Waldo: Moffatt: side, that we might have to intercept and tile around, then again we would return and it would be water that was not contaminated by landfill. That was the thing that was my next question, is how much seep do you find on that west slope of the.... Ralph, we won't know that till you dig down and if we do it will be seepage; it will be intercepted; if you dig all of these straight across from the south to the north, you're going to find all the different pockets (?) and this was roughly our idea when you start a deadline (?) on the bottom end and come north, so we might be quite deep when we get there. We hope we are because this is a much better operation than what we are trying to run now with the shallow depth of cover, and you see if you intercept water in there any place, you're going to take it clear to the top and when you do you can turn it around and landfill will be packed tighter than the ground that is existing there now. You break that up and you go back around, so we shouldn't interfere with anything that is there, really. Well, what all will you permit to be put into this dump? Would you take dead bodies and effluent from septic tanks, and that stuff. We have to take whatever they bring us. It's all waste. There again, those things that the Health 10 931061 Department can answer much better than I can as to what the problems there might.... Most of those things burn themselves out in the landfill pretty fast once they're sealed and covered. Waldo: Well, that was going to be the question. What happens to the solutions that come from dead animals and effluent from septic tanks, and all. Moffatt: If the water's shut off from the well, there's nothing more to feed it than try to crowd or can't Waldo: Moffatt: Voice 3: get into it. What fluid they bring with them are going to burn out within the fill itself. By "burn out" you mean they'll make gas? Heat, gas, decomposition, so everything that's in there. Is this correct, do you think? Dry out, yes. The thing, of course, that will be required is that it does control the surface drainage and the seepage around the fill areas, so that you don't get a situation where you get contaminated polluted water flowing from the fill area. Anything that occurs and drains from the fill area will be merely surface water and seepage water that is in good condition. Landfill operation, this is one of the advantage of them is that you can discharge anything that's in the landfill and with time it will stabilize and have conditions for 11 931061 super saturation continuing at a small state of right at that particular depth location. Waldo: Now, there's a spring in the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4. Did you know about that? Voice 3: I don't think that was included in our information, and I don't know about it. Moffatt: It's probably fed from coming through from shale. Waldo: I don't think there's any information from any well, or anything, on the SE 1/4 of that SW 1/4, that East 1/4, I guess. But there is a spring that crops out on that hillside. Moffatt: If there is it's probably from the shale and when we open her up we're going to expose it's source and intercept it at the top. This is where you divert it. It's got to be coming down through to there because the only way you can get water in this country is it's got to come from an irrigation above in one of the sitographic grounds (zones). Waldo: I don't know. Moffatt: Ralph, well I do. I mean, this is where it's got to be coming from. It's being irrigated above it's on ground that goes down in the ground and it will go to hit something that too go further and then it daylights out at some place; it probably in time dries up, I don't know. I imagine it is second water, it will be a seasonal time when it will shut down, but 12 921061 Waldo: Moffatt: Waldo: Moffatt: Waldo: Moffatt: Waldo: this is why I mentioned a while ago. We just don't know what's under that ground completely, so when you dig it and open in clear through you're going to find out that section, and that's the section to fill so you will have it under control, then as you move across, why, you do the same thing at the next one. Well now two weeks ago I was out there at about the intersection, oh, about the 40 acre corner there, in the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4, and seepy and it's been a pretty dry been any irrigation there that I on that hillside it's summer. There hasn't know of. There's a carrier ditch, that carries water across there, practically all the time. It didn't appear to have any water in it. It was in there when we were out there. You mean irrigation ditch. Yes, it carries water you see, down to another farm. Now, this, of course, whoever's farm we might see, it will be our obligation, if we ever work in that area, to bring that corner out and possibly realign it, to carry it on to his premises. In other words; we won't touch anybody's water.\ But I think this is the biggest source you had with the water rights. But that alfalfa down there looks to me like it was just pretty well seeped out. 13 931061 Moffatt: Could be. There again, cement -lined ditch in there a carrier ditch all the time will take care of that. Waldo: Now the next question is, is this water that's coming out of there goes, we think it goes, down into one of these two lakes that Mrs. Spomer owns down there. If you put a landfill in there, then what is she going to do to replace the water that she loses, or will it be polluted, if it comes on down there? Moffatt: Well, if the water's coming from the ditch, which I think it is because there's very little water going along that premises itself, looks almost running across, Waldo: Well that's what it looks to me. Moffatt: Well, if the water's coming from the ditch, coming down this back hole at the high spot goes to the next place you're seeing it. If we line the ditch and bring it to her, she won't lose any seep because it will all in the ditch to start with and if its going to her, she'll have practically 100% collection without the seepage involved. If you dry the seep up she won't get any water to start with and then what. If she receives the ditch of it, she's going to do this free of cost to her. But she's going to get more water than she has at the moment. And the ground would be dried up if that's what causing your springs. 14 931061 Waldo: No, she's isn't going to get any more water because it doesn't go over to her place. Moffatt: I understand you said that's where this ditch is going. Waldo: No, this ditch goes over to the southeast and Ella Spomer's property is directly south and to the northwest. Moffatt: Ralph, when they line these canals, and you line ditches across the country, when you drive to the place beside you, seep rights just disappear. Waldo: That's one of the problems that we have. Moffatt: Waldo: Moffatt: Well, I can't answer you. They have a prior right to a seep to [coughing] to I don't think I can answer you. But I don't think anybody can keep you from lining the ditch just because they had seep water or something out of the ditch that you were carrying.... I agree with you that nobody can keep you from saving your own water but I am concerned about this spring in there because I am not personally acquainted with it except by.... Well, I'm not either, Ralph, but it's got to be coming from an outcropping because of shale pulls out on the bottom, that's what it does, and I think that probably all the water comes in from that ditch above is going down that ridge and finding its way out at the 15 931061 Waldo: Moffatt: Waldo: bottom. If you'd stop, cement the ditch, I think you would probably stop the seep, because I don't think that premises itself is irrigated enough to runoff excessive or even if it was it would cause a seep, and practically got to be from that carrier ditch, or premises above might be, being irrigated. Now, I have another question. What are you going to do with this land when they get through with it, using it for a landfill. We intend to make a good piece of farm ground out of it because the surface amount of dirt and we intend to cover more than is required by any law. In other words we intend to cover enough --. We won't know this exactly how much is until we get in there and see what our bottom is. Then we can find our balance points where it's no longer economical to dig deeper over the whole dirt past their points, you see. Then we probably have about a 3 -foot or more, maybe 4 -foot of cover on that ground when we're through with it. And it will be on, it will either be on even grade that will be practical to irrigate or be benched; dropped down, then drawn out, you see. What will the elevations be like? How will they compare with the present elevations when you get this landfill completed? 16 931061 Moffatt: Well it will be flat across there, more or less, on the -- running east and west. But, of course, you can still have.... then we'll have to allow back off the premises or when they reach the other part of the , that's one of the reasons we won't be working too far to the West. We're going to have a slope on this, you see. A slope at all then under the road and this will take extra dirt, too. Waldo: There's depression, I wouldn't call it a draw, but it's a�draw of sortst it runs down, oh, in an easterly side of this west half, this west 80 acres,/is it your intention to use all of that for landfill and fill that in? Moffatt: If it's practical so we can. There's no reason why we can't, you know, from water or making Waldo: It appears to be pretty seepy and wet in there now. Moffatt: But I think if we intercept all of it, that seepage --by going clear through and going to the top we should be able to intercept these places where they come through and if necessary and we can head the drain up there and make an L shape and bring this all out to where daylight is--. That piece of ground should not have any seep within the L shape; should not have water left in it there if we intercept it. 17 931061 Waldo: Well, these are some of the requirements that ll Moffatt: these people are asking the Commissioners to put in the permission if it's granted. Well, I think Ralph, we're pretty well covered by the State and like I said, we're bound so tight now that I think if we can conform with the existing regulations, it's going to probably answer all the things you're asking today. Waldo: Well, we'd like to ask —You these.... Moffatt: Yes, sure. Waldo: and see what you think about them. First, we'd like to see a black top road leading into the dump. Moffatt: We will -- leading to the dump? Waldo: Yes, the old County Road, we'd like to have the County black top the road or somebody black top the road so that it becomes.... Moffatt: It is our intention to make an in and out road that will be surfaced. Waldo: To control the dust? Moffatt: Yes, right. Waldo: And then we'd like to have a screen of some type extended along the south and the east sides to collect any refuse or papers or trash that blows out of there. Moffatt: We are now at the present time-- we have 95% completed... we have large screens made out of steel pipe to be built into Weld County Landfill. You can go 18 921061 see them . We haven't put them up yet. They are portable and we vacuumed right into them with a dozer and they have hooks on them, see, because they're quite heavy. The dozer will pick them up and we can move them and we can move them. We intend to place those around our operation when the stuff is being immediately dumped, this will confine it down close. we haven't finished them completely because of the wire we brought in, we've found problems with it, it's wire, it's galvanized and welded, we find some bugs in snaps, so we think we have to do a bit more research on it Waldo: Moffatt: Waldo: Moffatt: before we the wire. We have enough of that fence to set up with a, helper fences between the two covers across from the (coughing) Up to 800 feet. That should contain all the areas we will try to dump at one time. Then if any of this trash were to escape that would you see that periodically, once a month or oftener, that you clean up around there. We have a man now that works every day. No, I take it back, he works, I think he works part of every day, he's an epileptic and he takes now, he was up and down the Evans bar pit picking up the first area and around the premises on land, so he will be continued. So it won't be once a month it will be regular. 19 921061 Waldo: Then would you see that the stream beds in these draws were kept free of pollution and obstructions at all times so you didn't push any dirt over in them and push them full or clog them up so that the drainage would be free in there. Moffatt: We will do this. Waldo: [coughing] Free of pollution? [Moffatt: We will do this.] And then we would want the County Commissioners to have a licensed sanitarian to make an inspection there, weekly at least. Chairman: Ralph, that comes under the jurisdiction of the Health Department. Waldo: Well, we think the County Commissioners ought to be responsible for seeing that it gets done. Chairman: We are. Voice 4 Glen, how often do you spend now. Glen Paul: Just once a month. But you want it weekly? Waldo: We think it ought to be weekly. Voice 4 Does that cause any problem? Glen: No, we're going to need a man in each territory every day. He can go by once a week. Waldo: We'd also like to restrict them from dumping any dead animals or effluent from septic tanks in there. Moffatt: Well, the problem that you've got there, I think you're worrying about something really, something nobody like to discuss much. We don't have that many 20 3.31061 dead animals. You're talking about an occasional Waldo: somebody's -- Most people bury their pets and take care of them. The larger animals go, we're located right now next door to a dead animal place and those animals go right in there because there's a pay for them. I don't think, with one exception to my knowledge, in the over two some years we've had that, we did bury a party's horse because they didn't want it, it was a pet and they just absolutely stood right there and made instructions for a place to bury it because it was a pet. But you're talking about a handful of cats, of course, and the septic tank, this we don't, this landfill down here we don't have many and they do take quite a few of them out to some others, but they don't make that much of a problem. You're not talking about very much. Well I know they have to dump them some place and Moffatt: (indistinguishable) Waldo: where they pumped it out of and get rid of it. Moffatt: They're covered every day. The thing will be covered and we will have plenty of dirt out here to work with, which we have not had since we started. For right now we just have to use a dirt real sparingly. 21 931061 Voice 5: Moffatt: Waldo: Moffatt: Voice 6 Waldo: Chairman: I think about the biggest percentage of your septic tank space is those that are on farms are dumped right on the farm. This saves those big farmers additional cost of septic tank and a person to haul it to a sanitary landfill. I am sure you get some of them on some subdivision. Well, I don't know that we could find out whose use the . We can call down to the landfill when the guys go on the books, how much money came in at $2 a truckload in the last year, if you want to, but you're not talking about very much, really. We don't know how much. We just know we don't want any of it. Well, there again, when you start the landfill one group don't want trees, the next group don't want this, the next group don't want car bodies, and pretty soon then where are you going to go with it. Then you've got to harness up a special, then you go somewhere and you have another hearing and somebody don't want that, so, like I said, a landfill really is about what it says. Ralph, do you have copy of the definition of solid waste? No, I don't. Most of this is under the jura. All of this operation will under the jurisdiction of the Health 22 931061 Department and the State Health Department and the Water Pollution people, is that right, Glen? Glen: Right. Chairman: They are under full control of the whole operation. Glen: And air pollution. Voice 6: Well, the residue from septic tanks would be included under solid waste, so that... Chairman: Do you have anything else, Ralph? Waldo: Yes, one more question. Mr. Moffatt would this be practical for you to take on if you didn't use the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4, that piece 40? Moffatt: Well, Waldo: Confine it to the west part of the west 80 use. Moffatt: I don't know what we'd do with it later, and, like I said really I don't know whether that will fit in or whether it won't fit in. But when we get through we've got to return that piece of ground into something and when we put $50,000 in a piece of ground, we don't intend just to drive off and leave it, because I think this is going to be part of what we do. We feel we've got to upgrade that piece of ground in order to help. But this has been an extremely difficult situation. We've been every direction trying to find a landfill and there's always some type of thing. We have spent 23 931061 lots of money trying to find out --where we can find out this and that and we're going to have to try to make everything work. But we're going to get back into the mechanics of it again, if its too soggy and too wet, and we can't intercept it, now if we can intercept it and take the water out of there and it doesn't make any problem, we can make a better piece of ground out of that when we leave there than it has ever been before. Just common sense tells you that, in other words, it isn't much right now. Voice 7 You folks have any more questions? Mikner: I'm Mr. Mikner. It sounds kind of interesting. It looks like its going to be a kind of expensive operation for Mr. Moffatt, talking about this, seepage what he's going to do with it, I'm satisfied there's places that are less expensive to operate. Moffatt: It's procuring one is the problem. Mikner: Well, that may be true, but I know I'm situation where there's.... About the first thing that recommends to me, is soil conservation (7) where the water is, the depth of it and what's to be done and things like that, which.... Moffatt: We already did it. We did it. Things were so inconclusive, you see. They only went down 40 maybe S feet another, well !we're talking about going to a depth / of maybe 50 feet. \ 24 9:1061 Mikner: What kind of pattern this take just Moffatt: They, the price. Still when they didn't have any depth to it, you see this doesn't do us any good, we need depth for a landfill. Mikner: Well, I mean, sure an individual can go out there in a takes different places and comes up favorable. Moffatt: Not necessarily. But the thing of it is, it wasn't particularly, that wasn't what we were after. They weren't conclusive enough. You think you got five feet, we want to know what was in the ground 50 feet, and we still don't know until we go down there. We have some well logs that tell us down as much as 50 feet and I think 45 feet, but still when we dig in shale can turn up like this, sandstone you see. we have enough equipment to rip some of this but sometimes it isn't practical that's why we will have to make a pass all the way from the south to the north wide enough to run this trench and then I think we'll know good enough that we can contour the rest of the ground and balance it and figure out how we have to put it back together to make this farm ground, because you being a farmer we can't just sit down and hear You're going to have to bring it out. If we can't make enough ground to come from the top to the bottom on the north, north and south on the west 25 931061 side, we've got to have an even grade. You can't Mikner: Moffatt: Mikner: Moffatt: Mikner: Moffatt: Mikner: Moffatt: (coughing) graders that way. and bank it and maybe I think that's a point too, I'm satisfied that Klineman (?) is your speaking of drying up isn't going to do it, because it may be coming in from a different direction. If it does, we'll intercept it across the top explain what I want to do. I may be mistaken. If I am, you may correct me. But does the County subsidize your operation? This particular operation? Well, any landfill operation. The County subsidizes any landfill that doesn't return $5,000 a year. That's been . This landfill here is much, has much more land than that. So the County does not subsidize this landfill. Well, let me your operating expense is to where... That's our tough luck. If we can't make it run, all we're concerned about was.... you see landfills that anyone knows that you can't hardly make them run even on a buck, you see. But they do have to give service to the area, so we operate those also. Now that when you talk about the subject. To get the record straight, now anything above $5,000 that we take 26 921061 in, and anything we take in on that $5,000 is returned to the County and credited off of the $5,000. For an example, the Windsor Landfill, this last year took enough in money even Kodak moving into that area and its off the County's back, they took in $5,000 or $7,000. Mikner: Well that's the reason I asked the question. Moffatt: Well, I want to make it clear, I've run into this before. The County's subsidizing everything you're doing. Well, the County is not subsidizing, only up to $5,000 and then any revenue that comes in is credited off of that five, so they get down, you. see. Does that answer your question? Mikner: [Muffled] Waldo: Darryl (?)'How long do you anticipate you could use this area for landfill.\ Moffatt: Well, Ralph, we're getting in a little better position to answer that now than when we first started because we know, and, of course, your area is growing and all these things, and then again we don't know how much of that ground we can actually use, just like we've been discussing, some of that ground might not be practical to do but we'll still try to turn it into something. ;But if we can use, say 80 acres of that ground to a depth of approximately 45 feet, I think 27 931061 we'll have at least a 15 -year goal. At the present, if you increase it that much more for the cutdown (?) C Voice 8: i Ralph [Waldo], we figured around 60,000 population and we figure average about 5 lbs per person per day. So we :figure about 300,000 lbs going into this place everyday and from there we figured anywhere from 15 to 25 years. That is if the conditions, like Earl stated, and you asking to stay away from the east side of the 80. Moffatt: So anything can influence it. If we can increase that 15 from what we planned, in other words if we go down to 80 and we find that we can work there practically, that's going to give you that much more time in that area. Now if it turns out that shale and sandstone is in there to the point to where it is not practical to move it, we've got to figure to balance the job out sooner, then that why I thought really conservative at 15 years, and they're trying to go further. Wagner: Now, these well.... Connell: If I could interrupt, before we go too far beyond his statement, can we have Mr. Wagner's full name and address for the record please? Wagner: Henry Wagner, 4603 83rd Avenue, Greeley, Colorado. Connell: Thank you, Mr. Wagner Wagner: 852-0347 28 931061 Connell: Thank you. Chairman: Ralph, do you have any more questions? Waldo: Yes. Unless the well logs that you had on the west 80 there all indicate that they hit yellow sandstone at 14 to 47 feet. Moffatt: I don't know as that.... Waldo: What's that yellow sandstone? Is that going to be what you want to have landfill operation in, below that you get into blue shale and then blue sandstone? Moffatt: Well, none of those are things we can't use to work. We had this over at Windsor now were in there --- incidentally we was just over there last week and opened up a new area and you can walk right down in there and walk around and you can see what you are cutting into there. Shale with its present and yellow sandstone can be moved with the type of equipment we have nowadays, but if you go some sands are a lot harder than that, then it's not practical. We got rippers nowadays that can pop most all that stuff but it's not practical. In other words, you spend too much horsepower and machine time to try and get a small area, so this.... you see if it comes up, your ground goes down and comes up and traps pockets in there and you can't relieve them as you come up and break most practically, then you'd best give up and figure that to stabilize. Then, because under your 29 931061 laws and under your common sense, you're not going to lay this down in pockets to be collected. You're going to have to daylight all the water out that will come in around your landfill. Waldo: What about the seep condition that there is on that westerly slope of that land.... Moffatt: Ralph, when you say west are you saying across the draw on the west side and coming back sloping east. Waldo: I'm saying on the east side of the draw. That whole hillside is seeping. Moffatt: I agree, but I think we are going to decide, I ,think we are going to intercept that water, we're going to divide it cut it off and turn it back into the draw. That's what I think we'll find. Waldo: All right, now that brings me to the next question. Mr. Stoddard if they can't cut that water off, then it will be your job to stop the landfill, is that right? Stoddard: Yeh, I have to agree, I think with Earl, we won't really know until we get into it more. Yes, it will have to be diverted either around the fill or, there are other ways of doing it. It can be piped underneath the fill with certain precautionary measures taken to keep any seepage into the culvert or whatever they use under the fill. The important thing that we will be looking at, of course, is to make sure that water 30 921061 Waldo: Stoddard: Waldo: Stoddard: pollution does not occur from this operation in any way shape or form. How often will your department make an inspection. We're, we make annual inspections at this point in time and certainly think that your idea of more frequent inspections would be better. If they were; if they just found unsuitable it would be the job of your department not the Weld County Health Department to shut it down, or is it both departments? We're together on it. I mean, if Glen Paul thinks there's a problem there, then they would contact us and we would.... Moffatt: Ralph, I don't think there's any problem here that —7 we don't have a solutio j In other words, but we've got to determine whether it's practical, like we said, we can put a drag line underneath. You're talking about a minute amount of water that's coming at a time, you're not talking about a large body there. Waldo: Well, it just keeps coming. Moffatt: Certainly, but once you put it under control\and put in a small pipe or pipe beside the cut, it won't increase because it still comes from a given point, see. Waldo: Well, that kind of bothers me too, because we don't know what development there's going to be to the 31 221061 north there. That could change the whole situation here, I believe. Moffatt: Not really. Once you close that off, or seal it off, it's going to go, water goes to the line of least resistance when you get something open then it's going to be open. Anybody that's going to develop into the north out there, it's going to take care of their own water if they've got.... I don't know what you're talking about, talking about city development or something like that? Waldo: Yes. Moffatt: Well, they're going to have to take care of that on their own drainage on main street, gutters and pipes and circulate. That isn't going to involve us. Waldo: They do that, but the underground drainage comes out someplace. Moffatt: Up there farming, there'll be less water in the town than there would be over these irrigated grounds. Waldo: You have any figures at all on the underground strata on that east 40 acres down there? Moffatt: Not until we explore. Waldo: Well, the only thing you know is that there is seep water down there in the corner now and it is seeping but no well information.... Moffatt: As I said, what we're going to do is, we'll let those quarter yards of dirt straight through and open 32 931061 it up and take a . Six months to get that thing ready to go, at that time there won't be any seepage left, it will all be out there in the open. Voice 8: You1talking there right west where the house used Waldo: Voice 8: Shable: to be at ? Yes. Is the spring new? Spring to the north and west of that house, where's that spring? Mr. Shable can tell you about that spring. It's either the first draw or second draw just west of that there. I think it's the first draw, I'm not real sure, but I've seen it because my brothers water cattle and it does run quite a bit of water. [End of Side A] Moffatt: I bet you an educated guess that that's water coming down that ditch goes across that piece of property and that line that springs dried up. Shable: The ditch you're talking about, irrigates, I should state my name probably, first, Judge. Chairman: That's right, if you will please. Shable: I'm Guy Shable, Route 1, Box 65, Milliken. Headland adjoining this land. The ditch you're talking about irrigates the Garcia farm and it runs right across the top, up there. 33 Wouldn't be over 5-600 feet long and that's the only water that comes in there and that grading there, that you're speaking about, has nothing to do with this grade of (overspoken by Moffat] Moffatt: It comes from above there. Shable: It comes from the Coopenrider and the, well, Knister place, and the Greeley -Loveland Ditch is where it really actually comes from. Until you stop that ditch you are not going to get rid of your seep water. Moffatt: This is true but I think we can intercept it and take it around the fill. Shable: Well, I farmed on some of the Knister place and I find out that we have lots of seep trouble up there and we're above you. And the land slopes your way so you're going to have our seep water, or his seep water I should say, plus other people's seep water, plus your own and I think you've got a problem. Moffatt: Well, like I said... Shable: Not only that you admit that you haven't dug down to see how far your sandstone is. Well my brother's farmed that and I've been up there when he farmed it and a lot of times your ploughshare will hit the sandstone. Moffatt: Well, you'll hit loose sandstone. 34 931061 Shable: And, you can move some of that.... You can't move it to no great depth because I've tried it up in Wyoming on uranium and you just can't do it. Moffatt: Well, it depends on where you're at. Shable: Well, it gets hard or you have to go down a little bit. Moffatt: Afraid of the hanging cliff. Shable: Personally, I think, excuse me Ralph [Waldo], go on ahead here... Waldo: Go ahead. Shable: He asked me a question, but I think you are in trouble on that piece of land. I think when you go out there and run some deep tests on it you're going to find out you have water problems everywhere, even up on top of the hills you are going to have water problems.`•, Moffatt: Che interception cut it off at the property line and taken back to that draw, that's where it's going to go. Shable: But you're not going to be able to cut if all off. Have you ever run.. Moffatt: Then we won't under it, it'll be going along where -- [TAPE CHANGE] -- There was a large portion of repeated language before picking up with Moffatt. I have deleted this duplicated portion.] 35 931061 --it was before, if it had a carry before it would still have one because if we can't go down it and move it then we won't be Shable: Have you ever run a drain line in shale. Moffatt: Yes. Shable: How did you get along with it? Moffatt: Well you're on the bottom, if you get it all you don't change. Shable: You don't have no sand or anything there. Moffatt: No you're on the bottom when you're on shale. That's why. Shable: You can pack that with sand and if you do you'll take care of spot maybe as wide as this room but above that you won't have a thing done. Moffatt: But if you put it on grade you will. You're going have to put it on grade. Shable: I tried it, we.... Moffatt: No, we put those things in. That is our type of work. Shable: I know that. Moffatt: We got equipment enough to do it, but... Shable: It ain't my type work but I've done it; it doesn't work. 36 931061 Moffatt: If you put it in on grade, water's water, there's no secrets about it, it's just going to follow what you got and if you've got open lines it will go down. Shable: Ever so far if you put crossline in it you might stop. Moffatt: Well, I just said that, if we have to go along the intercept, go clear across the whole place on the upgrade and turn and take it down and out that area. That's it. You're intercepting. What are you going to do then, where are you going to get the water then, it won't be coming off our premises? Well, it'll still be going through your premises. Anything that comes from up above has still got to go somewhere. Moffatt: c_ Well, when it hit, when it does, we intercept and take it around Now, if it's flowing under us, it's not practical to go down, it's not going to be a pollution problem because it's below you. It isn't something going under you because you've got sandstone there. It's got to come up through your landfill. Why won't it come up through your landfill. Moffatt: Well, fine... Shable: It can't do anything else. Moffatt: You can intercept it, can't you? Shable: Shable: 37 9a1o61 Shable: I don't think you intercept it that good. That's my own personal opinion. I'm no engineer. I've been in water a long time and I know it just can't be done. Moffatt: We have intercepted. Chairman: Are there any more questions? Guy, any more? Shable: Oh, I've got some other questions. Chairman: We want to hear all this as a matter of record. Shable: Well, to start with I own this land: East 1/2 of E 1/2 Section 6, Township 4N R66 W that joins this land on the SW corner and it joins next to Ella Spomer's lake. My main objection to this landfill here is that is the trash and stuff that's going to blow off from it. Our prevailing winds are from the north, northeast and northwest, and that will run all this here trash is going to blow. You say you are going to put up screens. I've seen screens and I've also seen your man you've talked about and he seems to be a pretty good man. I've check that down here and he is working. But there still is trash that gets away from you. Moffatt: We don't have any screens out there yet. Shable: I'm talking about the roads. He's not working out in the fill where the wind blows, he's working where it blows off the trucks, is that right? Moffatt: Well, he works all around the place. Shable: Well every time I've seen him he's been on the highway. But anyway my main objection is that this 38 931061 here pollution problem, the water problem and this here, and then the main thing is, I haven't talked to the County Commissioners about it yet but just a little bit. I planned on making a housing project out there myself and this here, you know what that will do to my housing project. You just as well say goodbye to it; nobody's going to buy land where there's landfill with garbage. I figure the valuation of my land is going to go down and should be going up instead of down. And I think that there are plenty of drainage on that. But I have an alternate plan for you. Now, you can't say everything's bad. I mean if you're going to say everything's bad you've got to have an alternate plan, right? I and my brother have some land out here on the dry land and I say there's the place where you ought to take your landfill. We have 960 acres out there and I haven't talked to him and I don't know if he's or not. But we will sell it to you. Moffatt: Shable: Moffatt: Where's it at? 11 miles straight east of Ault. It won't bother anybody. We've got a landfill up in that area, you know. The problem we've got right now is everybody's on our back because they don't want us to move this far out. I imagine you've got a banker man right here and he'll probably tell you he don't want to go this far. 39 931061 Shable: Big study. Did you read that in the paper where out in California they're figuring on moving that by boat out into the desert area? Moffatt: Well, that's not the point, we know, the thing is Shable: Moffatt: Shable: Moffatt: Shable: Moffatt: Well, we've got that coming up. We've got a closer site than that but the problem we've got you know is they don't want to increase the cost again. We've tried our utmost, every direction we could, and publicly and every way to get a piece of ground that is as close in as we can get for the benefit of everybody. Let me ask you a question, then. You say this will increase your costs. Right? Partly. I'm not saying that you're saying that. I guess the cost of where we are at now, we are an expensive operation. Well, I don't know why they let you go down on the river to start with. Because they had [coughing] and you've got to look back at the times. When we started this you didn't have the same problems. But if you... Shable: You're not hauling the garbage, is that right? Moffatt: No, no, we don't. Shable: Then how will it increase your costs? Moffatt: In which way? 40 931961 Shable: You said if you went away from Greeley a ways it will increase your costs. Moffatt: Well, no, but we're concerned with the people that are. This will increase the costs of all your moving. Shable: If you've got a site that will last you for 50 years without any trouble, you don't have water problems, you don't have slate problems, you can go Moffatt: Shable: Moffatt: Shable: Moffatt: Shable: Moffatt: Shable: Moffatt: down 50 feet down without any slate; we have tests out there that prove that. I believe that, but like I said that really isn't up to me and I know what you've run into. I just know because we do have our problem. You are looking for a place, is that right? Yes, now we are looking for a place. We are looking for a place as close in as we can get due to the people who are calling for a landfill. You say this place here will last 15 years, is that right. I think so. I say it won't last 5. Well, then you're badly informed. I'm not badly informed. I've lived here all my life and I We're nothing to know that place better than anyone. just getting into discussion that has do with what we are talking about. 41 931061 Shable: Well I've been over every foot of that land with plows. Moffatt: It's a lot deeper, but then Shable: I don't think you have. Moffatt: I've been over it. I won't start wrestling. Shable: I don't want to start wrestling too. Moffatt: Nobody Shable: Anyway the reason that I think that all this plan to get you out in the dry land where you don't have no population to bother you, all you've got out there is jack rabbits and antelope.... Moffatt: You have to sell that to . Just as I said, Chairman: I think we are going to have to hold this to this problem, Guy. I don't want to break up the fight and... Shable: That's all I've got to say, I was just giving them an alternate plan. Chairman: Let's stick to the case. I appreciate your comments. Now is there anyone else, that.... is there anything else you want to talk about, Guy? But we've got to stick to this case is the one we're talking about. Mr. Carlson. Carlson: My name's Bill Carlson, Route 3, Box 431, and shown the access roads, supposedly going out from the Ashton School House west and then north. Moffatt: We haven't made yet.... 42 Carlson: About a mile and three quarters of dirt road. It is unnecessary to oil them in the first place. I'm against the whole thing myself, I've got a small amount of property out there and it doesn't join but I don't like to see my property being close to a city dump. And, I especially don't want to see the traffic and the kind of people who are going to be going up and down those roads; sixteen, eighteen hours a day. Bringing these trash trucks coming through. Another thing on the sort of waste. What happens to the offal the guts and what not that say Greeley meat is refuse. Where's it go? Denver. Does it go to the landfill. Colorado, ah Animal Byproducts in Denver. It does go to Denver? I don't think you're going to get any of that type of fill at all in this because there's value and all that. I guess the closest statement that comes to something like that is they don't save the sweet oil (?) of a pig anymore and think Curley (7) you don't have any of this have you at all? I don't, really I wouldn't know, let's look at.... No, I think that stuff's all trucked to Denver. You mentioned Greeley Meat out here, and I know they have a truck and all this is loaded right into it Chairman: Carlson: Chairman: Carlson: Voice 9 Curley? Voice 9 43 9.711.061 Curley? Right, even this place next door, they pick up all that stuff from there, so.... but the access road I don't know Mr. Carlson what... [Brief interruption in tape] Back up west. Carlson: It doesn't make good sense to me because we [unintelligible due to overspeaking] go north, west of Ashton Schoolhouse and then back down south and it doesn't make sense to me at all. Curley? I think, Mr. Carlson, the reason they probably gave that is because it was easier to find from that description. Voice 10? But as far as traffic, I agree with you they'll go round the oil anyway. You won't drive the dirt roads yourself if you're coming out the other way you can go around the oil. Anybody comes from the other direction would anyway, just naturally. Carlson: What hours and what days are you keeping that open? Moffatt: A sixteen/eighteen hours a day isn't so. See we open at 7:30 in the morning and close at 4:30 in the afternoon. We're open 8:30 till 11:30 on a Sunday morning. Your hours aren't that great. Chairman: Ms. Carlson, will you give your name please? 44 9z1061 Carlson: Carol Carlson, Route 3, Box 431. I was wondering about who uses it? Is this open to the public? Everybody and their pickups and -- Moffatt: Everyone Carlson: --they come out there? Moffatt: Yes. Carlson: What's to keep them signs put out there? To direct them to the dump? All around the way around. Moffatt: Once the thing is confirmed we'll make up signs and put arrows on, you know, LANDFILL. We'll probably put out a mimeograph sheet giving maps on how to get there and probably give it out 60 days in advance of when we close the existing one, so that all the users would have opportunity, plus.... Carlson: What do you do with the people who want to take a short cut? Moffatt: In what regard? Carlson: Oh, it's shorter to go from the schoolhouse. Moffatt: Well, I can't do anything about that at all, you know. I mean this is something I don't have anything to say about it. Carlson: Well, if the neighbors object to it? Moffatt: Possibly, the Commissioners will have to decide on it. Chairman: If I'm right on the law, the law says that a county shall provide a road to the dump --period. 45 9Z1061 Tom: Chairman: That's all we can do with road and bridge money to provide a road to the dump, is that right Tom? At this point I don't know if there is a final determination made in the course cf County business to black top any given.... But we have to provide an adequate road to the dump, and that's as far as we can go to spend County money. In other words, we can't go inside the dump premises other than maybe help out with a dust problem or something in the case of an emergency which we did down here one time. We have to be oiling out there in front of that dump and we had about 500 gallon oil left over that we were going to have to haul back so we oiled round the office there to keep the dust down. But that's as far as we can go on something like that. [The tape becomes very poor quality at this point.] Carlson: Chairman: But what do you do about the people that want to take a short cut. Do you come back in here the road will have to be oiled there won't be any short cuts unless you go and try to Ma'am, down there to the, and come in a mile east of the old Carlson place, and I don't think they'll be driving that road when they can go oiled both ways. 46 n0%4 nra Carlson: Well, I was wondering, our road because there's a very dangerous corner by our house. We saw 5,003 last year right on account of that . I sure wouldn't want this traffic on that road. Chairman: Right is there anyone else? Do you have any more questions, Mrs. Carlson? Garcia: Yes, my name is Arthur Garcia and me and my father, we own this place. My concern is blowing paper an open ditch I have to run my water through that place because it would be In a screen all the way around, any way, seeing blowing paper being what it is and if you got it any time in the ditch where you run water 24 hours a day and if it ever got in there at any time and create damage Moffatt: I assure you that we will take care of it, whether there screens, leaves or , but you won't have any problems. Chairman: Ms. Telep, do you have? Telep: I'm Myrtle Telep and I heard about this from my parents, Mr. and Mrs. Knister, and I really am sorry that you couldn't find some other place other than out there because I think that just beautiful and I hate to see a dump there, isn't there some other place? Can't you keep looking for a while? Moffatt: Well, we can then Mrs. Telep what we're up against everyone is all on our backs in the other direction, 47 931061 get off the river where are we going to go? Pretty soon you're going to have to go somewhere. Telep: Out on the dryland. Guy said he had some Moffatt: You sell the public on that and you can go to the dry land. Telep: O.R. Guy Thank you, that's one Chairman: Go ahead Paul (?) Paul (?) I was not prepared to give the legal description of anything but the gravel pit of Torrez out here? Chairman: Can't dump in open water. Paul (?) Oh, that's open water? Chairman: Paul (?) Like I said, I wasn't prepared Chairman: Bob? Give us your name for the.... Licher: I'm Bob Licher, if that's what you . Our distance from the city of that, [Tape is extremely difficult to hear with traffic noises and distance from the recorder. A passage concerning distance has not been transcribed as being too patchy to be accurate.] Bob: A question I am a good question. About three years ago when we opened up landfill at the present location, we were told trash haulers that the landfill would be open the same as the city. I was 48 901061 given from April 1 to October 1 for a period of one hour extra during the summer months and if we have to travel this further distance, we are going to need this extra hour. Chairman: Carl (?), I think that is something you can work out with Earl. I think Earl: I agree. Bob: It's going to take us two hours and we make two loads, and four men on those trucks, the trash rates are going to have to go up. Moffatt: Still going to Voice: Bob what kind of raise... Bob: If you raise them any more the public is going to start hollaring and screaming worse than what they did before. Voice: Unless you How much difference do you think that raise will have to be? Bob: Two hours a day at 25% of my day shot if we haul two loads. Voice How many loads would you be able to haul out to the Sandhills per day? If you're out here Bob: About about 5 or 6 loads now. Voice: I say, if you had a landfill out in the Sandhills which has been suggested, how many loads a day would you be able to haul on a 30 -mile round trip? Bob: 30 miles? 49 911062 Voice: 15 out and 15 back. Chairman: Oh, it will be more than that. Voice: Oh, I'd hate to go that far. Bob: At least a half of your day. I'd have a full hour route and a four hour run, Chris (?) Voice: We're talking about doubling our fees. Bob: Well, it just too costly to go out 15 miles. Voice: what is there 7 Bob: Putting in a transfer station, and I don't think the City of Greeley like transfer stations or dumps or anything else around this community. I know I wouldn't. Voice: You got that distance you'd end up with transfer stations. [Difficult to distinguish with traffic noises or something.] Voice: The general opinion on 15 miles is the farthest.... I hereby certify that the foregoing document consisting of 50 pages is a partial transcript of the 1971 County Hearing Central Weld Landfill and was taken by me directly from two tapes of said Hearing. I further certify that any text which has been omitted for reasons of inaudibility or any other reason has been indicated by blank lines, or other appropriate notation. Dated: January 14, 1993. ieI�CJ� z Estelle Kennel 50 921061 Continuation of transcript of tape taken at the 1971 County Hearing. Central Weld LanOfill: ...I mean, think about everything else. Moffatt: Old Mosburg, even when he hauls quarters 10 miles, everything beyond that he knows is extra. Waste of money, waste of time, waste of equipment. For every Voice: Voice: Moffatt: mile driven, we've got to pay a ton [Indecipherable] We've got to keep Trash is getting pretty high. mile a record of that. We know it's going to go higher because the cost of everything else is going. I just bought a couple of pieces of equipment 36-37 Thousand Dollars. That's why buying a house up here you take 45 years to pay a house off, but we've got to pay these trucks off in 3 years. This is just a 10% right off the top with us with this cost of landfill. that extra Well, There's no way out of it. But I would like hour during the summer time, Earl. I've got everything from you, I've got my work out.... Voice: That's all I need. Chairman: Russell Billings back here. Bob: Oh, there's one other question. Chairman: Bob: That Record? Chairman: Yes. tape. Go ahead Bob. We'll let you get everything on the 51 9:4061 Bob: Moffatt: Bob: Moffatt: Bob: Chairman: Billings: Earl, the Windsor Landfill is still where it's at at the present time? Yes, we don't have have any reason to move but its all decent over been picking up all our don't you? Right. Yes it will O.K. Russell Billings. I'm Russell Billings and I represent First National Bank as agent on land --in fact it may have been on the land that we're talking about but I didn't know anything about this until I got to the notice. As agent it's my job to try to better these farms; improve the . I think I'm doing it Especially when you say it's going to take 15 to 20 or 25 years. The landfill out there certainly isn't going to help the value of any this land during that period of time. I think we all realize that the growth of Greeley is west; as Horace Greeley always said -- "Go West, young man, Go West!" Greeley told them that and I think this will take their land right in the line of development and it's pretty good developed land back down there to the south at this time. any problem with it; we don't it, and I my friend, there. You see the Windsor has trash... still be there. 52 you still use it, too 331061 Chairman: Billings: Chairman: Billings: Chairman: Billings: Chairman: Billings: Chairman: Chairman: Fry I when I didn't wasn't aware that the land was being sold and talked to people that I represent they just seem to be aware of what it was being sold for, or they indicated they wouldn't consider it at all. So, that's my feelings about it. Mr. Billings could you state for the Record please who you're the agent ...? You need my home residence, or.... No- Who you're testifying as agent, who.... I'm agent for the First National Bank. That is we are agents for... you want to know who I'm working for? Yes, yes please. I'm agent for Ann Fulmer. I'm agent for Realton. O.K., thank you. That is the bank agent I represent... Represent the bank, yes. Berm? Clarence Fry 13, 14, 15. I agree with Earl on some parts. We've got to go somewhere with the trash. Presently we're hauling two towns. It's going to be a nine -mile haul, roughly 8 or 9 miles from Greeley. All right, what do I do with haul. Do I haul that for 14 miles... a road sign that says Greeley, from Ault to Greeley. O.K. add another 9 53 931061 miles on to it. same way, I add another 9 miles from Greeley to Kersey by road.... Chairman: What's your cost per mile? Fry Never figured it out. Chairman: You're a hell of a trucker! Fry Well, I tell you, this is a long way to haul. Voice: You could use that sanitary landfill 7 miles straight east of Ault on Highway 14. Fry: O.K. open it up for us. We'll dump there tomorrow. Moffatt: Clarence, it's open. If you'll work with us, we've have a man there all day, already, every day of the week. So all you have to do it cooperate with us so we know because we've got to get it covered, you know. Fry That's two loads a week coming out Ault, Earl. Moffatt: Why haven't you talked to us about it? Fry I talked to Joe about it earlier. Moffatt: Well, I don't think this place stays open. Fry I know it. Moffatt: But I don't think that should increase your Ault run there but it will increase your Ault to Greeley, there's no question about that. Fry But I agree with Earl's project on this piece of ground out there, the way it sounds to me... I've never been out there. Sounds to me like it's a piece of 54 921061 ground that isn't being used for much. Well, the one man says he'd like to build houses, so do a good job of filling it, and then turn it into a park. Moffatt: There's a big quarrel about that but I don't know what else. Chairman: It's happening all over. Billings: On behalf of my clients I would like to say this, that they do object to using that east 40 acres. The reason, that that's right out on the road and it's going to be used for such a long time that it's going to depreciate the value of their land out there. Now, Mrs. Fulmer isn't going to be here forever and she isn't an old lady but she doesn't want to see her land depreciated for the next 15 years. And, Mr. and Mrs. Wagner live up to the north and the west of there and they don't want to see their land depreciated. The rest of the signers on that petition feel the same way, and there isn't any information on the soil conditions in that land, except that it's seepy. And it looks to me like it's an expensive proposition for Landfill, Inc. to go into and if it's an expensive proposition for them to go into, its going to make it all the more likely that they're going to have to do everything they can to cut corners and make things break even for them. And, we want to file this petition at this time, and if 55 9:1061 ' you'd care to, I'll read the names into the Record so that they can be part of the Record. Chairman: I think we will accept them as Voice: Mr. Chairman they are listed on the petition together with their addresses and the properties in which they have ownership or interest. The petition itself is marked as "Protestants' Exhibit A" and the map Mr. Waldo submitted is marked as "Protestants' Exhibit B" and in the absence of objection, I recommend that they be included in the Record as they stand. Chairman: We'll accept them as Exhibit A and B and if you want to mark that other one Ralph. Ralph: No, this is a copy of that one, a copy of the petition. Chairman: Oh, all right. I think that rather... this tape has to be transcribed and this can be made a part of the Record, Ralph, rather than.... Ralph: All right, fine. Now if you want a little additional homework, there's a real good article on garbage pollution in the Setter Homes and Gardens for October 1971, and maybe we could get some ideas about recycling or something that would save the land, or save the depreciation of property and everything else on this. It's a pretty interesting article there. Moffatt: You know, Ralph, on the depreciation of property, it was all wasted down on that river. The whole thing 56 931061 was all subject to overflow. Now, if you put a nice dike in there, since July the water's went down, so we stuck a lot footing in there, we dressed up all the old car bodies in the banks, and with that dike in there, enterprising people have bought the piece of ground the other side of it and they're putting in a mobile court, which they would not have been able to do had not that dike been built down through that river; which it could never have been built down there with money just out of your pocket. So it was built without any taxpayer money involved in it and it's taken all those trees out, thereby ensuring less chance of flooding that bridge in there, and the surrounding ground, and I got to disagree pretty strongly because it's upgraded all that ground around through there. And, it's not going to be an unsightly thing because...over on that west side...we've learned a lot and we've got a lot better piece of ground now. I don't know what the expenses will be but they've been terrific down there because we've had to bring everything out of the river, everything went and bring it over to get covered. We're going for depth out there now. And the thing gets covered every night, so you're just talking about a small piece of area that will be open in the day and closed in the night. 57 931061 Ralph: Earl, if you go 50 feet deep you're going to be below the water level out there in those ponds. Moffatt: If you... it depends on what you're talking about. When you come from daylight to bottom and you take it to the top, I don't know what it will be, we'll see what it will be, Ralph. But that ground falls a lot, awful fast down there. Ralph: I don't think it goes 50 feet. Moffatt: Well, I don't know. You'll have to drive and see. Whatever. Ralph: ` I'm trying to visualize how high it's going to get; a kind of mountain in there, when you get through with it. Moffatt: Well, no. When you get through with it, it will be fenced out and put in a piece of tillable ground and that's something it isn't now. Ralph: You've got to take out what's in there now and then you've got to add in 50 feet of trash and compact and then put like 50 feet on that. Moffatt: (Yes, but you're filling out down the grade all the time, you see. The hill's falling away, you'll be building out below you -.3 Chairman: Mrs. Telep, you have another question? Telep: Well, I just think you'll have a mesa when you get through. You'll have a table land won't you. Moffatt: Yes. Well, no 58 2:1061 Telep: I think that looks like the dickens. Moffatt: No, it will be brought down in banks. It won't just go out like this and then drop straight over. Besides it will be sloped off so that they meet the road on whatever dirt will stand good. Chairman: Mrs. Carlson. Carlson: What happens between now and, say, 25 years when somebody wants to buy the properties. I they won't buy it... it's too Close to a landfill. Chairman: That hasn't been the case in the East. We were on one in Peoria, Illinois, Billings and I, and they filled almost 160 acres of cap and fill Billings: We were actually at this landfill, a lot of it was dredging the river and they were pumping silt right out of the river filling up seep areas and dumping, other trash and stuff in there with the silt and, according to Caterpillar, they'd built this huge, it's their brand new foundry for all their parts. They built it right on top of that. Got quite a folder on landfills but I gave away some of the articles like Ralph had. One development back in the Kansas City area where they had something pretty similar to what's being done out at Evans now. They reclaimed some lowlands and had a 15 story apartment building built right on top of it and landscaped and an 18 -hole golf course and everything. There are excellent possibilities of 59 301061 Voice: Chairman: Guy: Chairman: reclaiming poor land back to good use on land if the job is done right. But, there is very little questions about this, I think those people from the Health Department here would verify my statement. Mr. Chairman, I have some pictures I took this morning I'd like to pass around in this. Mr. Moffatt hasn't built this yet and if you can see anything against this view from the road, from the bridge, and took just one picture and you can see from yourself water color. It's sand, but I think... and he hasn't built this yet. have to heap it on top. So I think its just.... a good part of land never r get through-- [coughing--indistinguishable]--soil over there and this is sand here. All right, at this time does anybody have anything else for or against? Are there any other questions anybody'd like to ask? Go ahead Guy. You said to keep this here. But. I still say I didn't know Ault -Kersey came into this deal, does it? Well, here's the situation we're in Guy, and this for the... "take that off" [the tape seems to clicks off]. Guy: You're going to take it out here Marsh. This is clear to West 8 where all these towns, you can take it out there in the dryland where I suggested, you said 60 831061 Moffatt: Guy" Moffatt: Guy: not to mention that, but I'm still going to re -mention it. Now from Ault we're just 11 miles; from Kersey we'd be 15; from Greeley here the closest would probably be around 25 to 6 miles, maybe. There's where your volume is now. Yea, I know that's where your volume is. But, this boy here, you just said in your statement, that after you get a load on, and I know it's the same because I do a lot of trucking myself, it don't cost very much more to go another 10 miles. It costs a little, we'll admit that. But 10 miles doesn't mean a thing and these boys said they're going to lose a lot of time. I don't know how fast their trucks go, but if they're going 40 miles an hour, which I'm sure they do, and they go 10 miles, what is it 15 minutes? They can't go out there in that time, it would take them 30-35 with all the corners, and all. I mean, extra time of what they're going. So I think this proposition that I've given you've got 960 acres and there'd be no water problem or anything out there, and I'd rather see the land out there put into that kind of a deal; I've already studied the land out there and this out here, because this is going to hurt my property out here terrifically. My values going down. Like Mr. Billings said, back there, he thought of making a housing project on that land and I thought 61 of the same thing of mine. I have I think a little better land that he does, but either way they are both good housing projects. Now this may not happen the next 5 years but I think eventually it will, because Greeley is growing West. And I personally, before you O.K. this here sits out there, I'd like for you to look at this other deal and see if it isn't feasible. And that's my suggestion. Chairman: Well it's these two boys back here's the ones that have to worry about that. Can you afford to run 50 miles round trip? Voice: Not sending a truck and a crew. Voice: Our problem is this Marsh. We make our money off of customers that we serve. The less dollars that you take away from the customer serves, only makes an add-on to the customers that we do serve. Some place along the line we have to protect our customers from cost. We realize it's a problem. Nobody wants it in their back yard. I wouldn't want it in mine; now this is true. It's a matter of a policing action to take care of what you have, that's all that's necessary. May sure there is no pollution. Chairman: All right, at this time if there isn't any more questions? Will the people supporting this application please hold up their right hand. Take a count Gale. 62 921061 ' People supporting the action? Or the people supporting the application? Gale: 8 Chairman: Let the Record show there's 8 people supporting the application. Now the people that's opposing the application? Gale: 12 Chairman: Let the Record show there's 12 people opposing the application. Is there anything else to come before this hearing? If not, I'll declare it closed. (Again, the tape appears to have been turned off.] Voice: I'd like to hold that over and make an on -site inspection. Chairman: We're going to have to go.... Voice: ...out the over the weekend and try to find it, find where it was posted. Couldn't find where it was posted, or where it was actually at. Chairman: His option runs out on that property, I think next Monday. (Muttering] Voice: I haven't even had the time to think about it or I haven't seen it either.... Chairman: Why don't we run out there or he'll lose his option if we decide whichever way we go on this. Drop property, what have you got on that Byron? 63 921061 Billings: I had a call this morning from an attorney whose representing Roger Gump and it seems as though Roger Gump is not the only person who owns that property at this point, which I didn't know. If he would ask... he had asked... he had just been assigned in this case and hadn't had time to actually find out what the problems were. Mr. Gump and the other owners, the other two owners of the property, asked for a continuance for this until next Wednesday so that they could bring in actually 3 different proposals as to construction of that road and I told him, as far as I was concerned, that time was kind of running out. That there was in our approval of that zone change a time limit for construction to be started, and he said he couldn't speak for Mr. Gump but the other two owners of the property were quite interested in getting construction started immediately and wanted to get all the problems straightened out, so I told him I would bring it before the Board and see if it was possible to continue this until next Wednesday, when they could actually bring out all the facts. I think we are going to need Chairman: I don't think... It think it's a problem between Byron and them. What do you know about it Byron? Byron: Well, other than (female voice interrupted with "why don't you listen to this guy; what do you know 64 S21061 Voice: Byron: about him?-] criteria we have established although we did extend it out to allow for expansion if he kept the same criteria. I want a that says the road he had it. Now if they want to go ahead and propose a What are they proposing, The real difference is they want it this way. This map that you have here, as indicated is fine. That's.... I'd like to see what else they can come up with. Chairman: How many hours did you spend on that --100? Byron: Oh, not that much, really. Probably a total of about a week's time. Chairman: I'm going to overrule him. Welfare security, we'll want to talk to Jeannie on that. Voice: I've got the information to the County Attorney. I guess he hasn't had time to do anything. Chairman: O.K. Make a resolution for a request of Larimer Weld Regional Planning Commission. I don't know what that means. Voice: Which one is that? Voices: [Indistinct] Chairman: [Tape appears to be recorded over, briefly.] We are not sending to the Board of County Commissioners a decision concerns a hearing we held approximately a week ago on Landfill, Incorporated, 65 821061 granting a land use permit of sanitary landfill can fill in the legal description on the Record. At this time I think it is in order to make a decision on the granting of this land use permit to Landfill, Incorporated. At this time, gentlemen, what's your pleasure? Voice: Chairman, I move for the approval. Chairman: Byron what do you say? Byron: I'm not thoroughly convinced that this is possibly the ideal location. I still have mixed emotions about what decision I should make, I'll have to vote "No". The Chair will vote yes on this decision. Let the Record reflect the vote is 2 to 1 for the operation of a landfill on the described property as shown on the application. With that we'll call this hearing closed and the application is GRANTED. Chairman: I hereby certify that the foregoing pages 51 through 66 of this document are the continuation of the transcript of tapes of the 1971 County Hearing, Central Weld Landfill, taken directly from the tape recording thereof. I further certify that any text which has been omitted for reason of inaudibility or any other reason has been indicated by blank lines or other appropriate notation. Dated: February 19, 1993 5,416 Esteffe Kenne i'ranScrrl.ber 66 931061 HEARINGS September 22. 1971 97 Fi: 54 2C1-1710,;:iRS NAA.E: Weld County Landfill, Inc. Box 596 . ,:. IT'u.?P.S ADDRESS: Evans, Colorado .-:?RESENTED BY: <: i I;ZQUEST:teSite approval for a sanitary landfill r--• �Chango of zone) or� „-- DATE FIRST HEARD: '7'2 w r (Land Use Permit) LcGAi DxSCRIPTIQN: W of the SW}, Sae of Sedtion 32, Township 5, Range 66 3PacESMAN: e a{ v Lei /2 - For: `•, l/� • A ainst: l . - i/ ?ri_.a., rr• • ‘y' Jlt ♦/i/71 (•'t' tr. • ,.i_ .i '''47/t . .. .fie I ire ".) ' '4' n7 C thl ui4MM Linkct II RECEIVED • SANITA'.I N DIVISION AU G 1 0 1992 WIELD CDUNIT HEALTH DEPT. RESOLUTION WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on September 22, 1971, at 2:00 P. M., in the chambers of the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, for the purpose of hearing the petition of Weld County Landfill, Inc., Box 596, Evans, Colorado, requesting approval of site for a sanitary landfill, also known as a solid and/or liquid waste disposal business on the following described property, to wit: West Half of the Southwest Quarter (W1SW;) and the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (SE;SW) of Section 32, Township 5 North, Range 66 West of the 6th P. M., Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the petitioner was present and represented by Earl Moffat, and WHEREAS, there was some opposition to the request of petitioner for the location of a sanitary landfill at said location, and WHEREAS, the said requested sanitary landfill operation is located in an agricultural zone as set forth in the Weld County Zoning Resolution, and WHEREAS, according to Section 3. 3(2) of the Zoning Resolution of Wed County, said sanitary landfill operation may be authorized upon the approval of the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners heard all the testimony and statements of those present; has studied the request of the petitioner; and studied the recommendations of the Weld County Planning Commission, and having been fully informed; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of County Commissioners, Weld County, Colorado, that the application of Weld County Landfill, Inc. to locate a sanitary landfill on the premises indicated above, be, and it hereby is granted under the conditions following: 1. That any sanitary landfill facility to be installed shall be approved by the State Health Department. 2. That all applicable subdivision regulations and zoning regulations shall be followed and complied with in accordance with the Zoning Resolutions of Weld County, Colorado. Dated this 6th day of October, A.D. , 1971. ATTEST: an44/ ' w� Cl* of th . oars/ BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO AYE . 1_//1, 2 mm /C, 17AY ore /% /571/7127"79 AY -e —)/(CH) (4‘1/) Deputy County Clerk RM: County Attorney CC: Landfill PC Health Dept EXHIBIT _ F A.D.-8 a5iosi Nn-, ,n'9 ' ,/ • Name and. Address of Responsible Operator • Earl Moffat • Evans. Colorado ,This,certificote Of designation may be temporarily suspended or revoked, after reasonable notice and pubIic,heacing Cause as outlined in Section13 of the Solid Wastes Disposal Sites and Facilities Act, '. (This copy to Color Dept, of Health, 4210'E..11T Ave.,` Denver 80220) day of October 19 7J, at G�eoloy County, Colorado. 2J 7 - � Signed:p ? ,i., " " i._61 _ . Chairman, Board of County Commissioners ES.. ENG, 72 Form Provided by Colo. Dept. of Health EXHIBIT A COLORADO DEPARTMENT .EALTH - 4210 East 11th Ave' - Denver, CO. 80220 File Copy Transmittal I.O.C. July 2, 1980 Board of County Commissioners Weld County 915 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Attention: June Steinmark, Chairman Gentlemen: A representative of this Division recently conducted inspections of the following solid waste disposal sites: 31 Disposal operated by Stan Reck near Roads 18 and 31; Weld Calmly )aaposal, Inc., operated by Bill Cannon near Roads 35 and 12; Colorado Landfillp Inc., operated by Lynn Kairnes near Road 6% and U.S. 85; and Greeley-Millikin Landfill operated by Lynn Kairnes approximately three miles south of Road 54 and vest of Road 2711. The inspection at 31 Disposal revealed evidence of potential for serious ground- water pollution. Areas of dead vegetation and rust colored deposits along the road into the site were noted. Water could be seen bubbling up from the ground and running down into this area. Also, trucks dumping directly into the emergency lagoon had eroded away the clay liner in several areas. Weld County Disposal, Inc., was operating the day of inspection with one unlined pit in use. This showed evidence for the potential for groundwater contamination. Colorado Landfill, Inc., appeared to be well operated and near completion. Because the fill is located in an old gravel pit approximately 11 ft. above groundwater, there is concern for groundwater pollution. Also, methane gas has been detected on site in levels as high as 60Z by volume. At present there are very few buildings adjacent to the site. However, with the completion of the site, methane gas would be a concern regarding future land use. The Greeley -Milliken Landfill sits on a hill. Surface runoff over old cells could contaminate the two ponds situated directly below the fill at the west end of the V( site. / \ Prepared by: Date: Executive Director's Action: Approved by: Legal Concurrence: Date: Date: Signed: Date Mailed: 7 cr.-..>z, AD 36 A - (Rev.) (10-74-50) Returned unsigned: Date: fi v 321061 Hoard of County Cosmissioners July 2, 1980 page 2 As operated these sites are in noncompliance with the Solid Waste Sites and Facilities Act 30-20 Part I, C.R.S. 1973. as amended and the regulations issued pursuant to that act. Under regulations recently promulgated pursuant to the Federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, these facilities will be considered open dumps. This requires the creation of compliance schedules for the proper upgrading or closure of these sites. We would like to request a meeting of the Commissioners and Representatives of this Division at your earliest convenience to discuss this matter. If you have any questions. please contact Joan Sovinski of this Division. Sincerely Albert J. Hanle, Director Radiation and Hazardous Wastes Control Division AJHtJBtev cc' Don Holder, Water Quality Control Division John Hall, Weld County Health Department 9x1061 /JJe7 W Co. er/ 7-zy-To II . Complaints Received (Attach copies) Action Taken SOLID WASTE FACILITY INSPECTION \ county a ) Date Facility (.�Q r- I r v i t 11 r 4. --)Location J Current Operator '‘,/ n—\ 4/e , C) r Mailing Address of Operator,_4yn —A,1/ I !��Jt-l]+/P aQ-e_ %r1! p: Current Owner (If different) ! U� Mailing Address of Owner Compliance f Non-comeliance Open Dump Located in _ Incorporated Area /J (All items checked must be explained in supplemental report) I. Publ}c Health and/or Environmental Hazards (Department enforcement against (violations) 1 A. Evidence of Industrial Waste Disposal (nnol a e>�3 WG(7eQ fkorn c w) B. Evidence of Potential for Seriwec Surface or Ground water Pollution C. Surface Diversion/Containment Facilities Inadequate or not Maintained D. Landfill Gas Migration Concerns _'/ E. Sludge or Septic Pumpings Disposal on Site (Unauthorized) F. Safety Hazards G. Non -Compliance with Approved Design and Operation H. Other II. Minimum ' REMEDIAL ACTION REQUIRED Standards, CRS 30, 20-110 (Locally enforced standards) A. B. C. D. E. Odors and/or Vectors Present Inadequate and/or Irregular Cover Inadequate Fencing (to control access and windblown debris) Burning apparent Not Designated and/or Improperly Zoned INSPECTING ENGINEERS RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SITE IMPROVEMENT c/i c AO ^,. a / OAP 1 (id waste c RP -At c.,0 .4/1j„/rl 6e h ° I t' t'r7"l n r-1 i -t n �; n p - o ' t>, --r, 41 e G I _ f _. artrl ,0 net S Sn It 14O"mot. fl o 0 S c Q.PAd . 'stn'1 1 5hnulrl 1 ke asetr 1; (DI i -, LIare a L V2ob1CmS IV. Remarks rip c Re rd\AI c# iL'r1 1't �1�Cti �C�S(' T_7 "'-f _qn nnn r''A. ≥Sr't (Name) Ker7 Wia-e IP-tC,_'te' rr) Pear 1t - ) O - LS 4 -t- PRESENT AT INSPECTION rrNo.rt2 LQlson Chi F .rt -'on l RGr EXHIBIT I ,4.o,-tr r u t.ct Jt S�'40?n 44-131041. Inspecting Engineer (WHrTF. CilPY-PTrr'1 tvrrTnw rfPv-nPPRATORI IPTNK COPY -COUNTY) (GOLD COPY-D,E,) 1 COLORADO DEPARTMENT \HEALTH - 4210 East 11tn Aven 1 - Denver, CO. SOZZO • File Copy Transmittal I.O.C. r �Y J July 30, 1980 Board of County Commissioners Weld County 915 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Attn: Ms. June Steineark, Chairperson • : I' 7- •. i _ - Gentlemen: On July 23, 1980, representatives of thin Division and the Weld County Health Department mat with the Weld County Commissioners to discuss po- tential problems at several solid waste disposal sites in Wald County, Colorado. A brief summary of the discussions held on each site is presented below. Brighton - Port Lupton Landfill - This landfill is nearing completion and is due to be closed approximately September 1, 1980. Potential problems which could arise at this site in the future are methane gal migration and leachate formation. It may be necessary to drill several leachate and gas monitor- ing walls around the site as development encroaches upon it. 1) 2) Greeley - Milliken Landfill - This landfill is located in an area of high groundwater. The high groundwater levels may be due to agricultural return flaws. Unless modifications are made to intercept and divert the groundwater, a leachate may develop at this facility and contaminate the adjacent ponds. The co -dis- posal of liquids and solid waste at this facility should be discontinued. The liquids (molasses water) should be separately / disposed of in a shallow lagoon. - . 3) Weld County Disposal, Inc. and 31 Disposal, Inc. - Both of the facilities treat and dispose of liquid wastes and have had ` • seepage problems in the pant. As the Weld County Commissioners and the Water Quality Control Division of this Department have been deeply involved in correcting the problems at thane sites. this Division does not believe it necessary to become involved \ at this time. Prepared by: Date: Executive Director's Action: AD 36 A - (Rev.) (10-74-50) Approved by: Legal Concurrence: Date: Date Mailed: l—/—�` Date: Ee.c) 901061 Th Board of Countyo Coloners - July 30, 1980 Attn: Ms. 8teineark - page 2 • In summary, both the Brighton - Port Lupton and the Greeley - Milliken Landfills are in compliance with the applicable State and Federal Statutes at this time. We appreciate having the opportunity to have mat with you and hope that you will not hesitate to ask, if we can be of any assistance in the future. Sincerely, Albert J. Haile, Director Radiation and Hazardous Wastes Control Division AJH:ILI.W: ew cc: Sam Cooper, District Engineer John Hall, Weld County Environmental Health Director Margo Nielson, Environmental Protection Agency 231061 TELEP AND TELEP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1315 • 54th Avenue Gr,elev. Colorado 60634 Samuel S Telrp Cynthia J Telep CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED George Kennedy, Chairman Constance L. Harbert, Commissioner Gordon E. Lacy, Commissioner C. W. Kirby, Commissioner William H. Webster, Commissioner WELD COUNTY/BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Centennial Center 01S 10th Street Greeley, CO 80611 Re: July 17, 1992 Notice of Non -Compliance - Greeley -Milliken Landfill Certificate of Designation No. 21 (Original Cart. No. 26) Final Closure Engineering Design and Elevation Contours REQUEST FOR HEARING Dear Commissioners: O(/f. M31 11e4t100 Rcdbne. (30)1 3J04"42 Fires Pa.l, Chianti(' (1031 5,14.411 I would like to express. my concern about the dump owned and controlled by Waste Management of Colorado, Inc. located southwest of Greeley, near the Little Thompson River, in Sec. 32-TSN-R66W of 6th P.M. About 21 years ago I was involved in the conception of the existing facility. At that time it was agreed that because of the Evans dump reaching its capacity we needed to find a new locatior.. Due to nuisance and being located in a major drainage area. it was proposed that the new site would be used for a maximum of IS years. The adjacent land owners felt that this was a time limit that they could live with. Final closure envisioned irrigable land which would not impair xnister, Shable, Garcia or Spoiler properties' planned land use, water flow or quality, or line of sight views by becoming a dominant land form.. That was the agreement that permitted the site to go unchallenged by lawsuits which would have prevailed because the decision was clearly against the weight of the evidence, testimony and known hydrogeology. We urge you, as Commissioners, to listen to official audio tapes of the hearing because they are an important part of the administrative record in this matter. We, as neighboring property owners, performed our part of the bargain. Now 21 years after the fact, six years and (31 owners past the target date of closure, and well past the natural fill capacity of the 1971 plan, it appears that this dump is to be used forever. From a common sense point of view I would like to mast the following observations: 21 years ago this facility was not engineered for its present day use. The height of the artificial structure has been permitted to rise higher than the natural fill capacity of the site, unduly increasing volume, weight and pressure on inadequate original fill. This dump is unlined. New facilities require liners. Composites are EXHIBIT I A.0.-(3 31061' Weld County Commissioners July 17, 1992 Page Two called for in 1993 federal regulations. The base of the fill was dug below groundwater table and dumped into standing groundwater. Fires, blowing trash, putrid odors, rotting carcasses, vermin, petroleum. medical and chemical waste, acceptance of material rejected by other counties and municipalities, recent deep dangerous trenches to divert the year-round water flow on the property. ponding on the site, escape of sludge and leachate, the habitual practice of dump management to permit unsupervised access and dumping (not during regular hourcl have taken place without us as neighbors filing official complaints in an effort to get along with the dump operation until final closure which was expected to have already occurred by now. Dust problems are intolerable along County roads from the north duo to excess trips and heavy truck traffic to and from the dump at all hours. Landfill operator paid funds into segregated reserve account for oiling the roads to the dump froth the north but only 2/10 mi. from south to the gate has been oiled. This work has repeatedly been scheduled. Landfill funds were to have been audited. Frequent re -grading. re -graveling or watering these dirt roads is general misuse of County road funds. One of the most important commodities Colorado has is its water. It is imperative that we protect this resource. Because of the topography of the existing dump site and its geographical location adjacent to the Little Thompson River (flow joins S. Platte at Dos Rios) you need to be aware of contamination of surface and groundwater as well as hazardous gas related to this dumpsite and welch pose grave public( health concerns. In examining the legal standards for now facilities I have found that a prudent approach to protecting our constituents is a facility that meets current day Standards. (eContrary to CRS 30-20-109(c) which is applicable to 1L11is site, legislative intent, and public policy, you have already missed at least two opportunities which mandated the filing of an Engineering Design and operations Report l'EDOR'1 for the Oreeley-Milliken dumpsite when an amended application is filed on a Certificate of Designation for an existing solid waste landfill j The wording. of CR$ 30-20-109(c) treats 'new or amended solid waste disposal site application" the same, clarifying legislative intent to phase in updated design standards for existing landfills. An existing landfill shall file for an amended Certificate of Designation pursuant to a 'substantial change of operationa.' CDHR Sec. 1.3.7 Current Colorado Department of Health 2egulations ("CDRR") Sec. 1.2 defines the term and CORR Sec. 4.0-4.8.3 regarding new facilities' ere then applicable to the site, instead of the previously -existing facility merely having to comply with the insufficient 'minimum standards' of CDHR 2.0. These regulations had an effective date of January, 1983. The first opportunity to apply current engineering standards and to require an acceptable closure plan pursuant to CDHR 4.8.3 was on or about May 7, 1986, when the Keirnes family (Lynn, wife Lela, with accountant/manager son Brad and ex -Weld County Assessor Richard Reines) applied for Certificate Po. 21 to be amended when they requested transfer of ownership from Colorado Landfill, Inc. to Waste Services, Inc. (emphasis mine) A possible next opportunity wes when the Keirnes family corporation changed to Waste Services Corporation. The most recent opportunity missed by Weld County of which i as now aware was on or about July 12, 1991. A letter signed by Brad Keirnes on letterhead of Waste 1.061 Services Corporation dated July 15, 1997 was written to, you about a liner 3 'Weld County Carmissioners July 17, 1992 Page Three transaction. A copy of this letter is attached hereto as Exhibit A for your review. This letter is remarkable not so much for the information it contained as for the information it apparently neglected to tell you: namely that the ownership, control and management of daily operation of the dumpsite had de facto passed to Waste Management of Colorado, Inc. Despite Waste Management operating Greeley -Milliken landfill in the name and guise of Waste Services Corporation for the past year. Waste Services did not file for an amendment to Certificate of Designation No. 21 reflecting the selling or tranferring, per;1bsy since doing so would have triggered the consequence of a public hearing and a mandated EDOR a year ago. Whether any member of the Keirnes family holds mere title or any actual operational role in Waste Services is irrelevant to'the substance of the salo transaction. As you probably know, assets and liabilities of a business can be sold to a purchaser in basically One of two wages (11 outright sale of land, equipment, etc. wherein the fact of sale and transfer is Made a part of the public records; or (21 sale or exchange of shares of corporations wherein the fact of sale of assets and liabilities is not necessarily apparent. Usually a target corporation is extinguished upon acquisition. However, a reverse merger in which the target corporation is the surviving entity may also qualify as a tax-free reorganization under Sec. 364 of the Internal Revenue Coda (with or without taxable 'boot' compensation to the sellers which, for example, might be cash or securities of a parent corporation such as Waste Management of North America, Inc. )currently trading for about $3l/share on the New York Stock Exchange, designation 'Waste'). I submit that when a small family business (the new lined and buffered Ault landfill packaged together with this marginal site) is bought out by a subsidiary Of a $7 Billion corporation there has occurred a 'substantial change of operations' which is defined in the Code of Colorado Regulations at 6 CCR 1007-2: 'Substantial change in operations' means any redesign or planned construction which would significantly change the planned design performance of a facility for solid waste disposal as originally designated, the addition of a category of wastes or other waste handling processes that have not been previously reviewed and accepted as complying with these regulations: or the selling or treesferrisg of the Certificate of Designation to a now operator. Tn my investigation of this matter, we have ascertained that representatives of both the Weld County Health Department and the Colorado State Health Department understand that they are dealing with Waste Management of Colorado, Inc. regarding this site. We seek approval of CDHR Sec. 4.8.0 Closure Data satisfactory to us and other parties negatively impacted by illegal dumping practices and variance from the 1971 plan and design of tais:dumpsite. We formally requested a public hearing in January, 1992. I had no notice of a study session on this matter January 20, 1992. From published reporte, our Concerns were not addressed. On January 31, 1992. a new slag of officers and directors for Waste Services Corporation was filed with the Secretary of State. CRS 30-20-112 thru 114 provide that after public hearing, savers penalties can be imposed for failure of operators to comply with applicable laws and Rags. None of this explains how the sale avoided triggering ,the required public hearing, EDOR and acceptable Closure Data for this marginal site in July, 1991. 51061 Weld County Commissioners July 17, 1992 Page Four My daughter and son-in-law recently met with the management of the dumpsite only to be told that topography. monitoring, volume. and merger documentation usually required to be maintained in normal course of business was not available. We have been "stonewalled' for a number of years, but at this point it has become egregious. Very truly yours, Samuel S. Telep Manager - Mister Farms cc: Tom David, Weld County Attorney cc: John Pickle, WCHD - Environmental Protection Department CITATIONS CRS 30-20-109(c) and 6 Code of Colorado Regulations 1007-2 ("Solid Wastes Disposal Sites and Facilities'1('CDHB Rags') aro applicable to this site: Colorado Department of Health Regulations (in pertinent part): 1.3.7 An amended application shall be made for a substantial change in operations as defined in Section 1.3 of these regulations, and shall be roierred to the County Board of Commissioners and the Department for review and approval before such change shall become effective. 1.2 "Su^staotial change in operations' means any redesign or planned construction which would significantly change the planned design performance of a facility for solid waste disposal as originally deignated; the addition of a category of wastes or other waste handling processes that have not been previously review and accepted as complying with these regulations; or the selling or transferring of the Certificate of Designation to a new operator. 4.8.0 Closure Data: The engineering design and operations report [EDOR] shall include, as a sinimOm, the following closure data: 4.8.1 Provisions for the maintenance of the facility after closure, to present or minimize nuisance conditions. 4.8.2 Provisions for the monitoring of explosive gas and groundwater wells or surface rater after closure. 4.8.3 Plans for final closure of the facility, including pleased fisal contours of fill surface after closure. CRS 30-20-139(c), in pertinent part states: (c) The establishment of a fee for the review of a new or amen,,cs&solid waste disposal site tnplication and for the preoperatioa inspection of such site shall be as follows:...(fee schedule of up to several thousand dollars is set forth based on volume aild is dependent on sound and reliable record -keeping practices) 321O81 WWPA L. SCOTT TURNER 3102020447 P.05 Waste Services CORPORATION July 15, 1991 Board of Weld County Commissioners 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 tear Commissioners: RECEIVED SANITATION DIVISION JU 15 1991 WELD COUNTY MID DEPT. I wish to take this opportunity to inform you that effective July 12, 1991, Waste Services Corporation has merged with. Waste Management of Colorado. This action was taken to enable Waste Services Corporation to continue our commitment to meeting Weld County's solid waste management needs in a more comprehensive manner. As a small family business, we determined that we needed additional resources and means to do so, as wall as to meet the increasing regulatory, financial and competitive demands ce our industry. Upon realizing our limitations, we sought and selected the company whom we believe is best committed to the same principles by which we have done our best to conduct our business. We believe that the addition of Waste Management's expertise and strength to Waste Services' ongoing operations will result in our continuation of what we trust has been cost-effective and environmentally -sound service to our customers and to Weld County. Waure Services Corporation will continue in its ownership, development and operation of the Central Weld and North Weld Sanitary Landfills. I intend to continue in my present management role. If you have any questions about this matter, I would be h:•appy co try to answer them at your convenience. Thank you. Res ectfully CBS;/kbc cc: Don Wes Rod Lee C. Bradley Keirnes President Warden Potter Allison Morrison FJmIBIT A 231061 6037 SEVENTYSEVENTII AVPxtn . cam ry rnenvsnn KENT E. HANSON (303) 449-06(O Atlorncy et Ler Caoyoa Center 1681 9th Street, Suite 216 Boulder, Cotorn4o 80302 September 11, 1992 Certified Mail, Return j?eceiot Reauested George Kennedy, Chairman Constance L. Harbert, Commissioner Gordon E. Lacy, Commissioner C.W. Kirby, Commissioner William H. Webster, Commissioner Weld County/Board of County Commissioners Centennial Center 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Re: Central Weld County Landfill Dear Commissioners: Tc. elm (303) 443M;C I represent Samuel Telep. As you know, Mr. Telep owns land adjacent to the Central Weld Landfill and has raised several concerns about the County's failure to regulate the landfill as required by State law. Most recently, these concerns were raised in January 1992 when Mr. Telep first requested that the county hold a public hearing on the change of operator for this site. When the County failed to act, Mr. Telep raised several questions in a letter dated July 17, 1992. His questions have not been answered despite several subsequent communications. After reviewing the public records concerning Central Weld Landfill, I find Mr. Telep's concerns to be extremely well- grounded. Weld County has not conducted a public hearing despite "substantial changes in operations" as defined by Colorado's regulations pertaining to solid waste disposal sites ana facilities. More specifically, the landfill has been allowed to significantly change its planned design performance. When the original certificate of Designation was issued, the final surface elevation of the landfill was to be no higher than surrounding properties. Nevertheless, the County has allowed landfill operators to begin construction of a trash plateau. In addition, a substantial change in operations occurred when Waste Management purchased all stock of Waste Services, Inc. from the Keirnes family. Data recently submitted to the County confirms that there is off -site groundwater contamination. The County has expressed EXHIBIT George Kennedy, Chairman Constance L. Harbert, Commissioner Gordon E. Lacy, Commissioner C.W. Kirby, Commissioner William H. Webster, Commissioner September 11, 1992 Page 2 some concern about this situation but has taken no action. The County even failed to conduct its quarterly monitoring in August and has allowed Waste Services to withhold its most recent monitoring data. This is only the most recent example of the County's failure to inform itself about activities at the site. It appears that the County has never required the submission of engineering, design and operations plans and reports in violation of the Certificate of Designation's requirement that the operator comply with all State laws and regulations. Engineering reports concerning the design and operation of landfills has been required since 1971. Moreover, the regulations make the operators' records available to the County Board of County Commissioners upon its request. One can only speculate about the reason the County has allowed Central Weld Landfill to operate virtually unregulated and about the reason the County has delayed responding to Mr. Telep's concerns. None of the likely reasons reflects favorably on the County. I request that the County take immediate action to fulfill its responsibilities and enforce all legal requirements applicable to Central Weld Landfill. At a minimum, the County should: 1. Investigate off -site groundwater contamination, and in conjunction with the State, require appropriate remedial action at the site; 2. Enforce the requirement that the final elevation of the landfill not exceed adjacent land surfaces in compliance with the design on which the Certificate of Designation was predicated; and 3. Obtain an up-to-date engineering design and operations report, together with all other information necessary to evaluate t`e performance of the landfill. Because of the County's past delay in responding to Mr. Telep's concerns, I must demand that the County acknowledge no later than Wednesday, September 16, 1992 that it will begin to 231061 • George Kennedy, Chairman Constance L. Harbert, Commissioner Gordon E. Lacy, Commissioner C.W. Kirby, Commissioner William H. Webster, Commissioner September 11, 1992 Page 3 act in accordance with the above requests. If such acknowledgement is not received, legal action will be initiated. Mr. Telep and I would be happy to meet with the Commissioners if you wish to discuss any of these matters. Sincerely, /te cc: Lee Morrison 821061 Aast3 Manaccmen; :;t hcl:h ..4rrerica. Inc. Mountain ''^'cq:on 5660 Greenwood P!a22 Blvd. • trglewood, Colorado 30111 Suite -2d • ,...2/777 September 18, 1992 Mr. John Pickle Weld County Department of Health 1517 16th Avenue Court Greeley Co 80631 Ms. Austin Buckingham Colorado Department of Health Waste Management Division 4210 E 11th Avenue Denver CO 80220 R 7.1ltrr- -, SE? 2 1992 n•rn a .., ,•r, SUBJECT: CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL (CWSL) EXPANEnti O GEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION Dear Mr. Pickle and Ms. Buckingham; As discussed in our meetings with Ms. Buckingham on July 10,1992 and Mr. Pickle on July 17,1992, Waste Services Corporation (WSC) has authorized Golder Associates Inc. to complete an• expanded hydrogeologic study as part of the CWSL investigation. As previously reported to the Weld County Department of Health and the Colorado Department of Health, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were detected during the initial investigation in four shallow down-gradT€ent monitoring wells (CWMWs-4, 5, 5N, and 7) and at the outlet of the landfill underdrain (LF-UD). Their locations are shown on Figure 1. The VOCs detected at these locations are listed in Table 1. The basis for the expanded study is to assess the extent of migration of the detected VOCs in the shallow groundwater downgradient of the landfill. Golder Associates Inc. is scheduled to commence this investigation on September 21, 1992. The fieldwork is expected to be completed by September 25, 1992. Golder intends on using a Temporary Sampling Point (TSP) system as an alternative investigative approach to conventional drilling and well installation. Specifically, Golder will use the GEO Environmental Expendable Aquifer Sampling Implants (EASI) system. The EAST system provides for minimal surface disturbance, no permanent well installation, and quicker collection of groundwater samples. wpgnukpick e.916 P: CWLp9,l [EXHIBITII r A . DE- LC 931061 Pickle/Buckingham letter 2 September 18, 1992 Golder proposes a phased approach to groundwater sampling. Initially, TSP-1 through ^.^SP -5 will be installed and sampled. TSP- 6 and TSP-7 will be installed and sampled if VOCs are detected in the initial four temporary sampling points. The proposed monitoring locations are also shown on Figure 1. Since the project consists of a phased approach additional sampling locations may be required to ascertain the extent of VOC migration. Golder's report describing the field investigation and its findings will be forwarded to you as it becomes available. If you have any questions please call 8111 Hedberg at 654-1133 or Alan Scheere at 770-3324. Sincerely, QS, Crckin 81 Hedberg Alan Scheere Landfill Operations Division V.P. BH\mmp cc: Jon Stephens, w/enc Dave Hayes, w/enc wp$1W\pickle.916 F: CWLF9.1 Environmental Specialist 93'1061 ti tett COLORADO September 28,, 1992 Waste Services Corporation 6037 77th Avenue Greeley, CO 80634 Attention Bill Hedburg OFFICE OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PHONE (303) 356-4000, at 4200 PO, BOX 758 GREELEY, COLORADO 80632 REcvvc,D Se) 2 9 1992 aro t<t+ntvaLm RE: Central Weld Sanitary Landfill (Greeley -Milliken Landfill) Dear Mr. Hedburg: The Greeley -Milliken (Central Weld Landfill) operation dates back to prior to 1971. Permits were conditionally obtained from Weld County on October 6, 1971 subject to approval by the State Health Department. The applicable statute, CRS 1973 S 36-23-3(2), was amended effective July 1, 1971 and required submittal of geological, engineering, hydrological, and operational data, as may be required by the State Health Department, for review and approval by the State Health Department. Regulations implementing the statute were not made effective until 1972. Apparently no study covering the engineering, geology, hydrology, and operations of the facility was ever prepared or submitted for State Health Department approval and, to date, no comprehensive plan covering all aspects of the site and its operation has ever been prepared, although there have been studies which address certain aspects of the site and its operation. Continued operation of this facility without a comprehensive evaluation of the site and its operation, whether required by the State Health Department or not, does not appear to be in the best interest of Waste Services as operator, adjacent landowners, or the citizens of Weld County. Recent discoveries, by your own testing, of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in ground water adjacent to the site only adds weight to the urgency of completing the appropriate studies. The Board understands that studies have been underway since early this year in order to establish an operations plan to show compliance with Subtitle -D regulations, but that the operations plan is not yet ready for submittal to state or local agencies. EXHIBIT A .D, -/(0 Waste Services Corporation Page 2 September 28, 1992 The Board respectfully requests that a plan containing geological, hydrological, engineering, and operational information be completed and submitted as soon as possible to County and State Health Departments and the County Department of Planning Services, and that it be done no later than 45 days from the date of the letter. It is expected that this plan should cover all aspects of the anticipated expanded continued operation and use of the existing fill areas. As you have been advised previously regarding your Subtitle -D operations plan, the submittal of the plan will likely trigger a need for a full review under either or both the Solid Waste Sites and Facilities Act (Certificate of Designation) or the Weld County Zoning Ordinance (Use by Special Review). This process would include public hearings. Thank you for your continued attention to this matter. Yours truly, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 7---- George Kennedy Chairman GK/LM/gb:waste pc: Weld County Health Department Department of Planning Services Lee Morrison, Assistant Weld County Attorney Austin Buckingham, State Health Department William A. Jeffry bc: Kent Hansen sfl1.06i• OCT. 5 '92 1a:49 PAGE.002 ® • COLORADO September 28, 1992 OFFICE OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Note nom ass4004 pct 4700 PA 90x 763 GSICZS . C. wRMoo 9C6r2 Waste Services Corporation 6037 77th Avenue Greeley, CO 80634 Attention Bill Hedberg RE: Central Weld Sanitary Landfill (Greeley -Milli -ken Landfill) Dear Mr. Hedberg: The Greeley :Milliken (Central Weld Landfill) operation dates back to prior to 1971. Permits were conditionally obtained from Weld County on October 6, 1971 subject to approval by the State Health Department. The applicable statute, CRS 1973 $ 36-23-3(2), Ka_ amended a tect ve Sulu 1, 1971 and required aUlaMittal of engineering, hydrological, and operational data, as may e required by the State Health Depart -Malt, for review and approval by the State Health Department. Regulations implementing the statute were not made effective r ' +,. Apparently no study tWer:hg the engineering, geology, hydrology, and operations of the facility was ever prepared or submitted for State Health Department approval and, to date, no comprehensive plan covering all aspects of the site and its operation has ever been prepared, although there have been studies which address certain aspects of the site and its operation. Continued operation of this facility without a comprehensive evaluation of the site and its operation, whether required by the State Health Department or not, does not appear to be in the best interest of Waste Services as operator,. adjacent landowners, or the citizens of Weld County. Recent discoveries, by your own testing, of volatile organic compounds (VCCs) in ground water adjacent to the site only adds weight to the urgency of completing the appropriate studies. The Board understands that studies have been underway since early this year in order to establish at operations plan to show compliance with Subtitle -D regulations, but that the operations plan is not yee ready for submittal to state or local agencies. EXHIBIT A-.o,c7 931061 OCT• 3 '92 14:50 PAGE.003 C. Waste Services Corporation Page 2 September 28, 1992 The Board respectfully requests that:a plan conrrtn:ug geological, hydrological, engineering, and operational information be completed and submitted as soon as possible to County and State Health Departments and the County Department of Planning Services, and that it be done no later 'than 45 days from the date of the letter. It is expected that t.7is plan should cover all aspects of tae anticipated expanded continued operation and use of the existing fill areas. As you have been advised previously regarding your Subtitle -D operations plan, the submittal of the plan will likely trigger a need for a full review under either or both: the Solid Waste Sites and Facilities Act (Certificate of Designation) or the Witireounty Zoning Ordinance (Use by Special Review). This process would include public hearings. Thank you for your continued attention to this matter. Yours truly, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS rge Kennedy Chairman. GK/LSE/ gb : waste pc: Weld County Health Department Department of Planning Services Lee Morrison, Assistant Weld County Attorney Austin Buckingham, State Health Department William A. Jeffry •* TOTAL PAGE.003 ** 421061 ott W1�Dc. COLORADO October 5, 1992 Mr. Bill Hedberg Waste Services Corporation Central Weld Sanitary Landfill 6037 77th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80634 C DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 1517 - 16 AVENUE COURT GREELEY. COLORADO 80611 ADMINISTRATION (303) 351-0566 HEALTH PROTECTION (303) "306'3 COMMUNITY HEALTH (303) 3534639 Mr. Hedberg: This Division has reviewed your Hydrogeologic and Geotechnical Characterization for the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, dated July, 1992. Trevor Jiricek and myself will be meeting with you on October 6, to discuss our concerns with regard to the report. At this time, we do wish to advise you that in the opinion of this Division, the findings in your report, specifically, the presence of volatile organic compounds in the offsite monitoring well, constitute a violation of section 2.1.4. of the State Solid Waste Regulations. You have been most cooperative up to the present in taking appropriate action toward mitigation and remediation of these problems. Consequently, we will suspend further legal action, pending our meeting on October 6, the results of further studies, and so long as you continue to cooperate as you have in the past. ` Very ,ly/yours, «4 p' ohn S. Pickle Director, Environmental Protection Services Division mc: Lee Morrison. Assistant County Attorney Randy Cordon, M.D., M.P.H., Director 4"1061 SECTION 2 MINIMUM STANDARDS 2.1 Minimum t andards All facilities for solid waste disposal shall comply with r the following minimum standards of the act; 2.1.1 Such sites and facilities shall be located, operated, and maintained in a manner so as to control obnoxious odors and prevent rodent and insect breeding and infestation, and they shall be kept adequately covered during their use. 2.1.2 Such sites and facilities shall comply with the health laws, standards, rules, and regulations of the department, the. Racer Quality'ControI NCommission, the Air Quality Control Commission, and all applicable zoning laws and ordinances. 2.1.3 No radioactive materials or materials contaminated by radioactive substances shall be disposed of in sites or facilities noc specifically designated for that purpose. 2.1.4 'A'site and facility operated as a sanitary landfill shall provide means of finally disposing of solid wastes on land in a manner to minimize nuisance conditions such as odors, windblown debris, insects, rodents, and smoke; shall provide compacted fill material;' shall provide adequate cover with suitable material and surface • .drainage designated co prevent ponding of veteraand wind erosion and prevent water and air pollution; and, upon being filled, shall be left in a condition of:orderliness and good esthetic appearance and capable of blending with the surrounding area. In the operation of �•' such a site and facility, the solid wastes shall be distributed in the smallest area consistent with handling traffic to be unloaded; shall be placed in the most dense volume practicable using moisture and compaction or other method approved by the department; shall be fire, insect, and rodent resistant through the application of an adequate layer or inert material at regular intervals; and shall have a minimum of windblown debris which shall be collected regularly and placed into the fill. C 2.1.5 Sites and facilities shall be adequately fenced so as to prevent waste material and debris from escaping therefrom, and material and debris shall not be allowed to accumulate along the fence line. 2.1.6 Solid wastes deposited at any site/or facility shall not be burned, other than by incineration in accordance with a certificate of designation issued pursuant to section 30-20-105; except that, in extreme emergencies resulting in the generation of large quantities of combustible materials, authorization for burning under controlled conditions may be given by the department. 2.1.7 Any provision of the "Air Pollution Control Act", Title 25, Article 7. section 108. CRS 1973 as amended, to the contrary notwithstanding, the board of county commissioners in any county with less than twenty-five thousand (25,000) population, according co the latest federal census, is authorized to develop regulations, by resolution, permitting the noncommercial burning Revised 8/90 i(10) S 5121061 6ir WIDc COLORADO October 7,1992 Mr. Bill Hedberg Central Weld Sanitary Landfill 6037 77th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80634 Dear Bill: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 1517 . 16 AVENUE COURT GREELEY. COLORADO 80631 ADMINISTRATION (3031 3534586 HEALTH PROTECTION (303) 353.065 COMMUNITY HEALTH (3031 353.06°,9 This letter will confirm our conversation of October 6. 1992 concerning the Hydrogeologic and Geotechnical Characterization of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, July 1992. Trevor Jiricek of this office and Alan Scheere of your office were also present at our meeting on this date. During this meeting we discussed the findings of this study, and also the recommendations from Golder Associates. The presence of vOCs in the offsite monitoring well is of concern to us all. Further, the possible contamination of the Spomer Lakes and the ditch coming from them is another area of concern. We discussed the recommendations as follows: 1. The design of the unlined portion of the diversion trench along the northern boundary of the site should be revised to prevent continued recharge to the shallow aquifer system. Any change in the diversion trench would be reflected in a new Design and Operations Plan. Several alternatives were discussed including lining the trench. 2. The extent of the off -site volatile organic compound migration south of the landfill should be delineated. Results of testing performed prior to this meeting should be available within approximately two (2) weeks. 3. The current use of the downgradient water wells south of the landfill should be determined through interviews with well owners. Plans in this regard have been incorporated in the new Groundwater Monitoring Plan, a cony of ceived at this meeting. We EXHIBIT L1q.o,- (R S21081 will review this document within the next two (2) weeks and comment on this aspect as part of that review. 4. Surface water in Spomer Lakes should be sampled to determine if discharge from the landfill underdrain is measurably impacting the lakes. We discussed that this sampling also included the ditch coming from the Spomer Lakes and continuing through the adjacent property. It appears that a part of these results is contained in the "Confirmation Groundwater Sampling" , dated October 5, 1992. It was indicated that sampling results from the ditch will be forthcoming within the next five (5) weeks. We received a copy of this document, the day of our meeting, and will be reviewing it over the next two (2) weeks. Our comments will be forthcoming at that time. 5. Shallow monitoring wells along the southern portion of the landfill should be resampled to provide a larger database and to confirm the results of the Golder investigation. Results of this testing were also contained in the "Confirmation Groundwater Sampling". 6. The potential impacts from upgradient irrigation activities should be defined through quarterly sampling of all monitoring wells. This is in the Groundwater Monitoring Plan and will be reviewed as above. 7. Seasonal water level changes should be determined through quarterly monitoring of water levels in all monitoring wells and soil gas probes. Also in the Groundwater Monitoring Plan and will be reviewed as above. 8. The extent of saturated refuse in the northern portion of the landfill should be determined through installation of additional piezometers. After some discussion pro and con we decided that continuing to monitor saturation levels in TP-1 and TP-6 would not be extremely costly, and might be of service as you decide what to do regarding the diversion trench mentioned in u 1. Other than the above issues, we discussed the fact that regular, written reports from you might would be helpful in communication. These would provide us with up to date information as you resolve this issue. We discussed the fact that a report as to any remediation recommendations would be forthcoming sometime within the next three (3) weeks. We look forward to receiving this document. S31061 We also discussed the fact that other issues will arise from time to time as we resolve this issue. We were all aware that these would have to be addressed as they arise. Please accept this letter as the Division's response to your Hydrogeologic and Geotechnical Characterization; however. understand that the Colorado Department of Health may have additional comments. or requirements regarding same. If this letter does not accurately reflected the discussions at our meeting. please contact me. Also, I certainly appreciate your attention to, and your cooperation in this matter. Very trcyy yours, Ge S. Pickle irector Environmental Protection Services xc: Glenn Mallory, Colorado Department of Health Lee Morrison, Assistant County Attorney George Kennedy, County Commissioner 0 '1061 . (303) 449-0600 Certified Mail KENT E. HANSON Attorney at Law Canyon Canter 1881 9th Street. Suite 216 Boulder, Colorado 80302 October 16, 1992 George Kennedy, Chairman Constance L. Harbert, Commissioner Gordon E. Lacy, Commissioner C.W. Kirby, Commissioner William H. Webster, Commissioner Weld County/Board of County Commissioners Centennial Center 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Re: Central Weld Landfill Dear Commissioners: Tckfuc (303) 4434490 Over the past nine months, my client, Sam Telep and other members of the community have voiced growing concern over the situation at the Central Weld Landfill. These concerns arose out of existing environmental problems and the County's long history of allowing - and even assisting - owners of the landfill to operate in violation of state law. Within the past few weeks, the County has begun to pay greater attention to this matter. The County's actions, however, do not adequately address problems at the site. Indeed, some action promised by the County has yet to be taken. Generally, requests for action have been met with resistance and unfounded arguments attempting to justify the County's past inaction. In some cases, requests have simply gone unanswered. This letter summarizes the reasons for Mr. Telep's concerns. It concludes with a request that the County take immediate action co correct existing problems. The County Never Required Compliance With Ae Certificate of Designation The Weld County Commissioners approved the Certificate of Designation on October 6, 1971. At that time, a certificate of Designation could be issued only with the approval of the Colorado Department of Health ("CDH"). This requirement was incorporated into the Certificate of Designation which was EXHIBIT A,0,- ao 0 04 .4 -J1AC-7 Weld County Commissioners October 16, 1992 Page 2 granted subject to the condition that "any sanitary landfill facility to be installed shall be approved by the State Health Department." This condition was never satisfied. CDH approval was not obtained before the Certificate of Designation was approved because the County Commissioners wanted to accommodate Earl Moffat and Weld County Landfill, Inc. Moffat held an option to purchase the site of the landfill. The option expired in October 1971 and Moffat wanted approval to operate a landfill before exercising the option. In addition, Moffat did not want to go to the expense of performing the required environmental and engineering work if the County was going to deny his application. CDH explicitly advised the Weld County Commissioners that the Certificate of Designation "be made contingent upon the submittal of an engineering report concerning the design and operation of the site as described in Regulation 3 and 4" of the state's proposed regulations which became final in early 1972. A review of CDH and Weld County files reveals that no engineering report of any kind was submitted over the following 21 years. CDR has never given its approval to the facility. At no time has Weld County taken any action to require compliance with this condition of the Certificate of Designation. Indeed, weld County ignored several requests over the last year to require the operator to submit an engineering, design and operations report as required by the law. On September 18, 1992, in response to repeated demands, the County Attorney's office indicated that it was drafting a letter demanding that the operator submit information for the County's review. On September 28, 1992 the County finally requestedthat the operator submit a "plan containing geological, hydrological, engineering, and operational information." The County allowed the operator to submit the information as late as November 19, 1992 (16 days after election day). The County acknowledged that such information had not been submitted previously and that full review of the plan was required under state statute and County zoning ordinance, but failed to set a hearing. Apparently, the County intends to allow the landfill to operate without complying with the existing Certificate of Designation. There also seems to be a presumption by the County that any amended certificate of Designation will allow current operations to continue. The County Never Approved Exyg4d Operation, Since 1971, the size of the landfill has been expanded and its operational life extended. Each of the several expansions of 01061 Weld County Commissioners October 16, 1992 Page 3 the facility have significantly changed the performance of the facility as originally designated. As a result, each change has been a "substantial change in operations" requiring the filing by the operator of an amended application which must be reviewed and approved by the County and CDH before the change is implemented. The County knew about each change but never required an amended application be filed. weld county's approval of the original Certificate of Designation was based upon several representations by Earl Moffat concerning the operation and ultimate.size of the landfill. Among other things, Moffat represented that: all draws would be kept (free of pollution and obstruction; the depth of fill would be approximately 45 feet; there was a "fifteen year goal" for the life of the landfill; fill material would be deposited laterally from the hillside; final elevation would be at an "even grade or benched" and would not extend above the crest of the hill; three feet or more of cover would be placed over the fill, resulting in a "good piece of farm ground." During the 1970's, the County was well aware of the deficiencies in the information it had concerning the operation of the site. In 1979, CDH requested information concerning existing Weld County landfills. On April 20, 1979, the County responded that "a great deal of information requested in your form simply was not available for these sites without a large financial expenditure for a consultant in this area." The County went on to state, "Before the [Central Weld Landfill] site is developed any further, the hydrogeologic characteristics of the draw on the West end of the field should be analyzed. Water flow through this area may prevent further westward development of the site." Nevertheless, the County expressed its intention that the Central Weld Landfill would be expanded to create one of "two large regional sites." The County was then discussing the development of the Central Weld Landfill into a regional site with Lynn and Lela Keirnes. The Keirnes incorporated Colorado Landfill, Inc., which began operating in June 1979. Lynn Keirnes is the brother of former weld County Assessor Richard Keirnes. The County agreed to sponsor the issuance of industrial development bonds to finance the acquisition and expansion of the facility by Colorado Landfill. The County and Colorado Landfill entered into a loan agreement on March 6, 1980 enabling Colorado Landfill to borrow $1.3 million. Under the loan agreement, Colorado Landfill committed to construct improvements on the site in accordance with the "Plans and Specifications." Colorado Landfill represented that the Plans and Specifications had been submitted 231061 Weld County Commissioners October 16, 1992 Page 4 to and approved by all necessary government authorities and that they complied with all environmental laws and regulations.• However, Colorado Landfill never submitted and the County never approved an application for an amended Certificate of Designation. Some time before February 1986, the Central Weld Landfill operations underwent another substantial change when it began accepting for disposal liquid sludges. CDH notified the operator that this practice could continue only if he first submitted an amended application/operational plan for the review and approval of CDH and the Weld County Commissioners. CDH sent a copy of its letter to the County Commissioners. The County took no action. Weld County again came to the financial assistance of the Keirnes family in 1990 when the County issued another $3,360,000 in industrial development bonds. Most of the proceeds ($2,500,000) was used to finance the acquisition, development and permitting of the Ault Landfill. The balance ($860,000) was used to re -fund the 1980 bonds. The documents executed in conjunction with this transaction suggest that expanded use of the Central Weld Landfill was contemplated by the parties. The County did not approve an amended operational plan. In 1991, the Keirnes family sold its stock in Waste Services Corporation (the successor to Colorado Landfill, Inc. and the owner of the Central Weld and Ault landfills) to Waste Management of Color lo, Inc. In March 1972, Waste Management submitted a special waste plan to CDH. Documents obtained from other sources indicate the County has been involved with the review process, but the nature of the County's involvement is unclear. Despite several requests for documents regarding Central Weld Landfill, the County has not made the special waste plan available. The County Did Sot Approve Chance of Operator% Under Health Department regulations, transferring a Certificate of Designation to a new operator constitutes a "substantial change in operations" requiring County review and approval of an amended application. The operator of the Central Weld Landfill changed on several occasions. Only once did the County approve the transfer of the Certificate of Designation. The purpose behind the rule is to assure that each operator is qualified and capable of meeting the performance design of the facility. Depending upon the qualifications of the operator, the transfer of a Certificate of Designation may be denied altogether, or the Certificate may be amended to include Weld County Commissioners October 16, 1992 Page 5 performance standards that the new operator is capable of meeting. The County interprets the rule to apply only to the purchase of corporate assets and not to mergers or other stock acquisitions in which all of the shares of stock of a corporate operator are acquired by a purchaser. This interpretation elevates the form of the transaction over the substantive requirement that an operator be qualified and approved by the County before taking over operations. This interpretation has also allowed operators to change due to financial problems and sales without being subjected to public review and comment at public hearings. The County Has Given Central Wild Landfill Preferential Treatment Not only has the County failed to enforce statutory and regulatory requirements as outlined above; the County has vigorously enforced those same requirements at other facilities. For example, the Eaton Landfill received its Certificate of Designation in 1969. In the mid -1970's, the County required the Eaton Landfill to submit engineering, design and operations reports. This stands in stark contrast to the County's position as late as September 1992 that it had no authority to require the operators o€ Central Weld Landfill to submit similar reports. Also as discussed above, Weld County assisted the Keirnes family in financing not one but two landfills: Central Weld Landfill and the Ault Landfill. It appears that this assistance was uniquely available to the Keirnes family. It now appears that Weld County is preparing to relocate a segment of county Road 27h just north of the entrance to the landfill. Currently, the road curves gently around an existing wetland in the toe of an earthen dam. The only possible rationale for the County's action is to facilitate access to the landfill. The resulting destruction of the wetland would violate federal regulation3. The County Has Obstructed Public Involvement The County has been generally unresponsive to the expression of concerns concerning the Central Weld Landfill. When the County has reacted, it has been only as a result of the persistence of the community. For example, the County learned of off -site groundwater contamination at least three months before citing the operator under the County's nuisance authority on October 5, 1992. This action came only after demands by the Satosi Weld County Commissioners October 16, 1992 Page 6 Ashton Call to Action Committee for an explanation of why the County had not formally cited the operator. The County has yet to respond to reports that Spomer Lakes have been contaminated and are discharging "milky" water that has the odor of garbage. In January 1992, Sam Telep requested that the County conduct a public hearing concerning the landfill. The County never responded to Mr. Telep's request, although it apparently held its own "study session" on January 20, 1992. On July 17, 1992, Mr. Telep sent a letter to the Weld County Commissioners articulating several concerns about the landfill. The County never responded to Mr. Telep's letter despite the fact that, on the same day, the County met with Waste Management of North America "to review current projects." In that meeting, there were discussions about "several projects" designed to "enhance facility operations." When the County failed to respond to Mr. Telep's letter, his daughter made several telephone calls to County officials and wrote letter on July 29, July 31 and August 18, 1992. Once again, the County failed to respond to any of these letters. The unresponsiveness of government is always disconcerting. It is particularly troublesome where, as here, the County has ignored public concerns while it has maintained an ongoing dialogue with landfill operators. The County has been equally unresponsive in supplying requested information. Requests for documents have been made to several County departments. Very few documents were produced. Most documents, including documents that the County authored, signed or received as an addressee, have been obtained from other sources. Documents the County has not produced include: documents relating to the industrial development bonds and in particular engineering reports, environmental audits, plans and specifications; quarterly groundwater monitoring results; inspection reports; Waste Management's Special Waste Plan; notes of many meetings with landfill operators; any environmental, engineering, design or operational information about the site (except for the July 1992 report of Golder Associates); and Planning Commission staff reports. The County's delays have all inured to the benefit of Waste Services and to the detriment of neighboring landowners. Waste Services has been permitted to Continue its operations without an engineering design and operations report. Under the ownership of Waste Management, landfill operations have been greatly expanded in an apparent effort to avoid some of the stringent requirements 231061 Weld County Commissioners October 16, 1992 Page 7 that will take effect under Subtitle D of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act in the next year. The delay .also has allowed Waste Services to negotiate the acquisition of property adjacent to the landfill so that groundwater contamination will no longer be off -site. The Need for Immediate Action it is clear that the county needs to exercise its authority and responsibilities with respect to the central Weld Landfill. Some of the necessary actions were articulated in my September 11, 1992 letter to the Commissioners. Because the County's efforts to exercise its authority have been less than vigorous, I must repeat our earlier requests. Information discussed above makes other requests necessary. As a result, I request the following: 1. Investigate off -site groundwater contamination, and in conjunction with the state, require appropriate remedial action at the site; 2. Enforce the requirement that the final elevation of the landfill after closure not exceed adjacent land surfaces in compliance with the design on which the Certificate of Designation was predicated; and 3. Obtain an up-to-date engineering, design and operations report, together with all other information necessary to evaluate the performance of the landfill; 4. Investigate surface water contamination, including the contamination of Spomer Lakes, and require appropriate remedial action at the site; 5. Prohibit any activity at the landfill that represents a substantial change in the operations as represented to the County Commissioners in September 1971; 6. Immediately schedule a public hearing on the issue of change of the landfill operator; 7. Locate and make available to Mr. Telep and other members of the public all documents in the County's possession regarding central Weld Landfill; and 8. Disclose the County's plans for County Road 271. 53106 Weld County Commissioners October 16, 1992 Page 8 These requests represent the minimum actions the County must undertake in order to comply with applicable statutes and regulations and to protect the public and the environment. I request that the County take these actions no later than October 26, 1992. If the County refuses to take such action, I would appreciate the courtesy of an explanation of the County's position no later than October 26, 1992. sincerely, C<AsZt-2- ent E. 77t0fl /to cc: Sam Telep SZ1061 Glen Mallory Colorado Department of Health Waste Management Division Mail code HMWMD-Hwc-B2 4300 Cherry Creek Dr. South Denver, colorado 80222-1530 RE: Central Weld County Landfill November 14, 1992 Mr. Mallory, Recently Waste Services (operator of Central Weld Landfill d a Waste Management Company) applied for three permits to discharge fluids from the underdrain located through the Central Weld Landfill and to discharge fluids from the Spomer Lakes located off site and to the west of the Central Weld Landfill. we strongly urge and recommend the denial of these permits for the following reasons: 1. Recent water tests reveal serious contamination from these points of discharge. Preliminary tests indicate Heavy Metal and VOC contamination. Weld County Health Department and Waste Services have not tested for a full spectrum of contaminants and therefore pre not completely confident as to what contaminants are contained in the discharged fluids. 2. Considerable controversy surrounds this particular landfill. No design report was ever filed with the State of Colorado or Weld County as required by your office in 1971. Hydrological and geological reports indicate significant amounts of subsurface water movement in a variety of dynamic conditions. The life of this particular site was originally estimated at 15 years and the present life is 21 years. Radioactive Waste was deposited at this site from 1973 to 1976 (Golder Associates, July 1992) and has yet to be identified as to location of deposit, amount of discard, and potential hazard. 3. Spomer Lakes are located on private property located off site from the Central Weld Landfill. These lakes receive large amounts of waste water from the landfill boundaries. The contamination questions regarding these lakes are still unanswered and the approval of discharge from these lakes would appear premature and unnecessary - 4. The discharge of fluids from these points is less than 1/2 Mile from the Big Thompson River and may violate The U.S. Clean water Act. Much of the discharge may be diverted to irrigate cropland and the landowners utilizing this discharge desire full analysis before its utilization. Much of the discharge would go directly into the Big Thompson River and until a detailed analysis of this discharge is made, any approval would appear imprudent and unreasonably premature. EXHIBIT 1 A.o,-a\ S. The Hydro-Ceological report furnished by waste Services admits that the•Central Weld Landfill is not lined and has no buffer zones to protect adjacent properties. This report admits to a significant and ongoing off site contamination. Since the identity and extent of the contamination is unknown, we urge you to recommend further testing before considering waste services, permit for waste water discharge. We urge your department to consider utilizing Subtitle D, Appendix II water testing as stipulated by the Environmental Protection Agency for the following reasons: 1. Colorado is re -writing their water quality standards and during this period, citizens, business and municipalities are without clearly defined standards and guidance. Appendix II standards are clearly defined and it provides a reasonable and methodical approach to water quality problems. 2. Colorado Department of Health will adopt standards at leant as restrictive (if not more restrictive) within the year anyway. App.II standards would appear to be the prudent and reasonable approach to any water quality problems the state encounters during this interim period. Yam Nelson (CSHD) confirmed to us last month that no required discharge permit had ever been granted nor applied for at any time. It is only as a result of our diligent investigations and inquiries that application for a discharge permit of any kind has recently been made. The fact of leachate effluent discharge at the outflow point of the underdrain was known at all times by the owners & operators of the landfill since the date of installation. On repeated occasions we have contacted waste Management local and regional personnel only to receive absolutely no cooperation or information. We are landowners/residents living in the Ashton -Daniels District of Weld County. The Central Weld Landfill is located in our district. we are very concerned with the Central Weld Landfill and the lac): of regulation and misapplication of Colorado and Federal Law. Sincerely, %74e%145. A/40 Michael S. Hayes 8200 W. 49th St. Greeley, co 60634 ca: County Commissioners, Weld County John Pickle, Weld County Health Dept. Kent Hansen Sy1061 plrq Nelson Colorado Dept. of Health Water Quality Control Division Permits and Enforcement 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South Denver, CO 80222-1530 December 14,1992 Ms Nelson, In reviewing the application for discharge permits by Waste Services for the Central Weld County Landfill (CWCL), we noted several factual discrepancies in their application. 1. The CWCL began operations in 1971 not 1967. Surrounding landowners and the Weld County Health Dept. (WCHD) verified this incorrect date. No dumping of any kind began on this property until Mr. Earl Moffat began operations in the late fall of 1971. Until then the land was partial wetland and partial pasture. 2. The underdrain is purported to be "generally 8 feet below the predevelopment ground surface". Interviews with landowners surrounding the landfill indicate that the western side of the landfill (the area of the underdrain) was excavated to a depth of 5 to 25 feet below the groundwater and the underdrain was setthrough this area. Trash was then used to fill in around the water and the drain. This is in direct contrast to the gravel trench specified by Waste Services. While we do not doubt that portions of the underdrain were constructed as described by Waste Services, we also know of the portions set beneath the surrounding groundwater table. Golder & Assoc. report of Jul 92 speaks toward this issue. 3. Sect. 9 of the Application Permit indicates that any public water supply intakes within 5 miles are identified on Atch 1, Fig. 1-2. This information is not indicated on that or any attachments. 4. Sect. 10 is incomplete in that this site is currently on the Superfund list because of past acceptance of hazardous and toxic wastes. Nuclear waste was disposed at this site from 1973-1976 (Golder and Assoc. Report Jul 92) and up to 10,000 lbs of Pesticide was dumped at the CWCL from 1973- 1976 (Glenn Mallory's letter dated Oct1987). Also in regard to Sect. 10, Waste Services states they are a permitted landfill. In November of 1992, The County of Weld discovered the Cert. of Designation was not complete inits original issuance. No EDOR was ever filed with the State or with the County. As a result, Waste Services is having to recomplete the process for a Cert. of Designation and will be required to meet a public hearing. EXHIBIT k.0.-aa- 5. Sect. 14 is inaccurate in the following regards: a. Landfill underdrain 001 water flows are the result of two flows; subsurface groundwater and surface irrigation of the Knister Farm north of the landfill. The irrigation operations are highly variable and during the period of testing by Waste Services, only a small irrigation operation was in progress. If the irrigation operation significantly increases (due to crop rotation and type of crop farmed) a corresponding increase in water flows will occur. b. The underdrain outflow is released at one of the Spomer Lakes. The particular Spomer Lake also receives all surface runoff from the western and southwestern slope of the CWCL. The landfill area (actual fill area) terminates at the shores of this Spomer Lake. The surface of this section of the CWCL is composed entirely of petroleum contaminated soil deposited and spread throughout the summer of 1992. Any water runoff over this area would/will carry contamination into the Spomer Lake. c. There is a retention pond on the eastern side of the CWCL. This pond has no discharge point. This water has been observed to be collected by a tanker truck and deposited into trenches along the western section of the CWCL and into the Spomer Lake;. Sect. 14 of the application requests information on all contributing wastewater to the effluent yet no indication of these above mentioned operations are listed or an evaluation of those effluents attached. 6. Sect. 17. Most of the water that flows into the inflow of the underdrain is directly affected by the surface irrigation operations on the farm to the north of the CWCL. These irrigation operations are by definition seasonal. These discharge flows are highly variable yet Waste Services indicated a response of "NO" to this section. 7. Sect. 19A. is incomplete in that several water tests have been performed onthis area of the CWCL all with significant contamination results (see ATCH 1). Waste Services contracted with Golder & Assoc. in a JUL 92 report that indicates heavy metal and VOC contamination offsite in the area surrounding the discharge points this permit application is filed for. Mr. John Pickle of the WCHD can speak towards this contamination concern. We note that Waste Services has indicated very little contamination in this area while private testing indicates significant contamination. 8. Sect. 19D. See Sect. 19A and ATCH 1 to this letter. 9. Sect. 19F. The aquatic life biomonitoring test done by Waste Management indicates significant toxicity at the 100% level. While they attempt to try and explain away the failure, the results are still a failure. If there was some question as to the validity of the 100% level another test should have been performed. By their own admission, " this sample would be acutely toxic at the 100% concentration level." Their methodology is extremely suspect in that the precise location of their sample point is not indicated. The discharge point for the underdrain is located atthe Spomer Lake, but it is very difficult to find the location of the underdrain discharge point. The Weld County Health Department could not locate its position until a member of our group escorted them to the point of discharge. If Ms. Sanchez (sampling technician) happened to sample the wrong water, Waste Mgt.'s tests would be highly diluted with waters from the Spomer Lake. 10. Sect. 21. Most of the wastewater will be applied to land during the summer and fall months. The underdrain releases water concurrently with the Spomer Lakes. This water flows entirely into an irrigation system utilized by 4 farms as their only source of irrigation water for their agricultural lands. It is also used to water cattle and horses. Any water not used is discharged into the Big Thompson River less than 2000' downstream from the discharge point. We note that Waste Services indicated on their application that no land application will be practiced, yet 4 farms use this water as their sole source of irrigation. Overall we have indicated 10 areas where Waste Services has erroneously completed their application for a wastewater discharge permit. This indicates a serious breech of reliability on their part. Significant controversy surrounds this landfill. It is located in a draw where extremely large amounts of groundwater exists (less than 3 feet below the surface on the western boundaries of the CWCL- Soil & Gas Monitoring Plan submitted NOV 92) in addition to large amounts of irrigation water that impinges along the Northern and Western Landfill boundaries. Their own water flow reports indicates the enormous amounts of water traversing through the landfill on a daily basis. The area of the landfill where the underdrain is located is situated in 5-25 feet of groundwater and it is suspected that this leachate is contributing to the contamination at the underdrain outflow discharge point (WCHD NOV 92). In addition, some radioactivity has been detected in the waters around the CWCL (Golder & Assoc, JUL 92) but to date Waste Services has not indicated the location of any radioactive waste deposits. c.!'fi.11‘. • The underdrain discharges into the Spomer Lakes. The underdrain was originally designed in this manner to conceal any leachate activity by diluting it with the waters of the Spomer Lakes. This water is used by 4 farms as their sole source of irrigaton waters. Any water not used (during the months not farmed) is discharged directly into the Big Thompson River (2000' from the underdrain discharge point) which meets with the Platte River approximately 1 mile downstream. The discharging of known contaminants into river is a violation of the U.S. Clean Water Act as you are well aware. We urge denial of the CWCL/Waste Services Waste Water Discharge Permit. There is ample evidence of erroneous information on their permit application. The issue of water contamination cannot be overstated when this water is discharged and farmers have historically used the Spomer Lakes for their irrigation operations. The CWCL has created an untenable situation in which serious contamination is exiting their operation and is discharging into the Big Thompson River in violation of the U.S. Clean Water Act. Given these reasons we most strongly urge the denial of their permit. Concerned, Michael S. Hayes ASHTON-DANIELS COMMUNITY ACTION GROUP 8200 W. 49th ST. Greeley, CO 80634 1 Atch. cc: Weld County Comm. Weld County Health Dept. Hon. Wayne Allard Hon. Hank Brown Glenn Mallory CDH/WMD Victor Sainz CDH/WQD w attei rt Waste Management of North America, Inc. Mountain Region 5880 Greenwood Plaza Blvd. • Suite 400 Englewood. Colorado 30111 303/^0.3324 December 11, 1992 Victor H. Sainz P.E. Colorado Department of Health Water Quality Control Division Permits and Enforcement Division WQCD-PE-B2 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South Denver CO 80222-1530 DEC 141992 •.4o a: Subject: CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL (CWSL) COLORADO DISCHARGE PERMIT SYSTEM (CDPS) APPLICATIONS Dear Victor: This letter is provided in response to your correspondence dated November 17, 1992 and received on November 30, 1992 concerning the CAPS applications for CWSL. As discussed during our phone conversation on November 6, 1992, CWSL has been actively compiling the required information for the submittal of CDPS industrial wastewater discharge permit applications for several months. The CDPS application for the landfill underdrain was submitted to the Colorado Department of Health (CDH), Water Quality Control Division (WQCD) on November 25, 1992. As a point of clarification, your November 17, 1992 letter indicates that the discharge from the surface drain/perimeter frenchdrain eventually discharges into the Big Thompson River. Rather, this discharge flows to an onsite retention pond which does not include an outlet for offsite discharges. The retained water is currently managed onsite (i.e. for dust control and irrigation of undeveloped areas of the site). However, CWSL does not intend to continue to use the water as described above, once approval for other management methods are received from CDH. The CDPS applic: non for the perimeter frenchdrain is in the process of being finalized and is ezoected to be submitted in December, 1992. its'Nrther'di nthsed; CWSL is also evaluating �e feasibiiity'•of coniuucang an st' c reznjecbon` vef'as an aalteinativejo.msnaS g the"Y �frettchdtain water under the CPDS system! Any information you may have concerning this alternative is requested. wpfltrl..1z12.10 Pcwu.l..o EXHIBIT I A(0,- a3 Ft 719S1 Letter victor Sainz December 11, 1992 Page 2 Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at '770-3324 or Bill Hedberg at 654-1133 Sincerely `2t�jee, Alan Scheere Environmental Specialist AS/mmp cc: John Pickle, WCDH Patricia Nelson, WQCD Roger Doak, CDH Bill Hedberg, WSC Barbara Taylor, WQCD .rarruz.to P. CW$L. 97401061 STATE OF COLORADO COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Dedicated co protecting and improving the health and environment of the people of Colorado 4300 Cherry Creek Or. S. laboratory Building Denver, Colorado 80222.1530 4210 E.1i th Avenue Phone (303) 692.2000 Denver, Colorado 80220-3716 (303) 691.4700 December 22, 1992 Bill Hedberg _ ,d Alan Scheere Waste Services Corporation 5660 Greenwood Plaza Boulevard, Suite 400 Englewood, Colorado 80111 RE: Application Completeness Review for Waste Services Corporation, Central Weld County Sanitary Landfill Permit No: CO - 0043419 Roy Ramer Governor Nokia A. Nolan, MD, MPH Gen4Ne Dsrectd For the past couple of weeks, the Water Quality Control Division of the Colorado Department of Health (the Division) has been reviewing documents pertinent to the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. These documents have been submitted along with a discharge permit application from an underdrain to Spomer Lakes. Groundwater and surface water laboratory data both upstream and downstream from the. landfill, letters from concerned citizens in the area, and documents by private consulting firms characterizing the geological and hydrogeological characteristics of the area are included in these documents. At this point in the review process, the Division would like to ask for 1) clarification on some information and 2) additional current data. 1. Clarification is required on the following: a. Please provide a full description of the following sample points: 1) NDIS 2) LF-UD 3) GWM5A 4) GWM5A-DUP 5) N -Discharge 6) RP - Inlet 7) ES 8) TB 9) LE - UD b. Describe the uses of the water that flows from the french drain to the retention pond. c. What is the ultimate use or destiny of the water that flows from the underdrain to Spomer Lake?-` EXHIBIT • to: 12/22/92 Bill Hedberg Alan Scheere waste Services Corporation Page 2 d. A drain flows in a westerly direction on the northern perimeter of the property. Please describe the discharge point and the nature of the drain. 2. Additional information required: a. Testing is required on all point -discharges which ultimately flow to surface waters of the State. Additional current data (3 months or less old) or testing is required for: 1) additional metals 2) fecal conforms 3) Nitrates and nitrites 4) Total suspended solids 5) Uranium 6) Organic chemicals 7) Pesticides See Table 1 (attached) In accordance with permit issuance protocol, further processing of this permit application will be postponed until the requested information is obtained. Your timely response will be appreciated. If you have any questions regarding surface -water discharge call me at (303) 692-3615. Sincerely, Barbara Taylor1 Environmental Engineer Water Quality Control Section Colorado Department of Health LETTER.WEL 12/22/92 PAGE 2 RY1,.0S1 to: 12/22/92 Bill Hedberg Alan Scheere Waste Services Corporation Page 3 cc: John Pickle Trevor Juricek Weld County Health Diana Orf Attorney 1675 Broadway, suite 2430 Denver, CO., 80202 L. Morrison, Weld County Assistant Attorney 915 10th Street Greeley, CO., 80632 Weld County Department of Planning 1400 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO., 80631 Chuck Cunliffe Director Weld County Commissioners 915 10th Street Greeley, CO., 80632 Dave Dubois North Front Range Water Planning Association 500 E. 3rd Street, Civic Center Loveland, CO., 80537 LETTER.WEL 12/22/92 PAGE 3 S:11.061 TABLE 1 ORGANICS PESTICIDES 1 Benzene 8enzidine 8romochloromethane Bromoform Carbofuran Carbon tetrachloride Chlordane Chloroethyl ether (BIS-2) Chloroform Chlorobenzene Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene PAH Dichlorobenzene 1,2 Dichlorobenzene 1,3 Dichlorobenzene 1,4 Dichloroothane 1,2 Dichioroethene 1,2 Dichloroethane 1,1 Dichloroethylene 1,2-cia Dichloroethylene 1,2 -trans Dichlorophenol 2,4 Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid Dichloropropanc 1,2 Dinitrophenol 2,4 Dioxin (2,3,7,8 TCDD) Diphenylhydrazine 1,2 Ethylbenzene Heptachlor Heptachlor epoxide Hexachlorobenzene Hexachlorobutadiene Hexachlorocyclohexane, Comma (Lindane) Hexachlorocyclohexane, Alpha Isophorone MethoxychlOr Nitrobenzene PCB's Pentachlorobenzene Pentachlorophenol Tetrachlorobenzene 1,2,4-5 Tetrachloroethylene Toluene Trichloroethane 1,1,2 Trichloroethene Trichloroethylene Trichlorophenol 2,4,6 Trichlorophenoxyproprionic acid (2,4,S-tp) Vinyl chloride Simazine Vydate (Oxamyl) Picloram Aldrin Dieldrin Endrin Endrin aldehyde Toxaphenc DDE DDT Aldicarb METALS 6 INORGANICS Aluminum Copper Nickel Zinc Cyanide Nitrate Nitrite Sulfide RADIOACTIVE Uranium OTHER PARAMETERS Fecal coliforme Total suspended solids V Re: CeAr•�l weld '52u (A,b.d e &..o WI`'oc. COLORADO MEmORAADU To From Suaect File December 23, 1992 Ow Linda Johasoa / Contaminated soil complaint - Central Weld Landfill On December 21, 1992. at approximately 11:30 a.m., I investigated a complaint regarding several truckloads of dirt being received at Central Weld County Landfill. I spoke to Bill Hedberg of Central Weld Countylandfill. The landfill is receiving contaminated soils from two UST removals in Arvada. According to the Special Waste Reports, the landfill will be receiving between 6000 - 8000 cubic yards. On December 21, as of the time of my inspection. the landfill had received 324 cubic yards. Prior to December 21, they have received 828 cubic yards. The Special Waste Report includes lab analysis from the excavation pits as well as the stockpiles. The 1 dfill was currently utilizing the soil daily cover. Bill Hedberg informed me iTiat they not ne to approval for eac load as that was a part of Central Weld's Special Waste Plan. D( -(t ITIEIT1ORAilDUI11 ! Pe To COLORADO From Subject: Chuck Cunliffe, Planning January 4, 1992 on. John Pickle, Health Central Weld Sanitary Landfill r; l.4 The Central Weld facility has been the subject of very close monitoring over the past six (6) months. Disclosure of offsite groundwater contamination by Waste Management in August 1992, along with growing community concern, prompted increased surveillance since July, 1992. and it continues to the present. During this time period, Environmental Protection staff have spent considerable time in field inspections of the site, meetings and correspondence with Waste Management, Waste Services, Colorado Department of Health, and other county offices, as well as review of reports and records from the facility. In the process of these activities we have determined the following areas of concern, which our Division submits as violations: 1. The Central Weld Sanitary Landfill had never filed a design and operations plan. This would be a violation of subsection 3.1.2. of the Solid Waste Regulations. There is some question as to whether or not this was a requirement at the time this facility was permitted. 2. The Central Weld Sanitary Landfill has never filed an amended application for substantial change of operations. despite the fact that the facility has changed ownership, and further that the facility appears to have accepted a category of waste that was not previously reviewed. This would be in violation of subsection 1.3.7. of the Solid Waste Regulations. 3. The Central Weld Sanitary Landfill has operated without required Discharge Permits. This is a violation of subsection 2.1.2. of the Solid Waste Regulations, and 25-8-501. Colorado Revised Statutes. 4. The Central Weld Sanitary Landfill contaminated the ground water. This is a violation of subsection 2.1.4. of the Solid Waste Regulations. The facility has been notified of this violation by our Division on October 5, 1992. and also by the Colorado Department of Health on December 23. 1992. 5. The Central Weld Sanitary Landfill has allowed ponding of water onsite. This is a violation of subsection 2.1.4., and 2.2.2. of the Solid Waste Regulations. 6. The Central Weld Sanitary Landfill has placed solid waste into the groundwater on this site. This would be a violation of subsection 3.1.11. of the revised Solid Waste Regulations. These regulations are scheduled to become effective prior to October. 1993. The Colorado Department of Health has determined that violations outlined in 474 EXHIBIT .. . Is and 06 above constitute a public nuisance. Environmental Protection Services Division concurs with this determination. Consequently. we would request that these violations at the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, be brought to the attention of the Board of County Commissioners, in the form of a public hearing for probable cause. Should you need any additional information, please contact me. xc: Lee Morrison 4l� 1 COLORADO mEmoRAnuum To From Subject: Chuck Cunliffe, Planning John Pickle, Heal Central Weld Sanitary Landfill January 8, 1993 The Central Weld facility has been the subject of very close monitoring over the past six (6) months. Disclosure of offsite groundwater contamination by Waste Management in August 1992, along with growing community concern, prompted increased surveillance since July, 1992, and it continues to the present. During this time period. Environmental Protection staff have spent considerable time in field inspections of the site, meetings and correspondence with Waste Management, Waste Services, Colorado Department of Health, and other county offices, as well as review of reports and records from the facility. In the process of these activities we have determined the following areas of concern, which our Division submits as violations: 1. The operators of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill did not file a Design and Operations plan, although a partial submission was made at the County's request on November 12, 1992. Additional information is still being submitted as it is developed by Waste Services. This failure to file would be a violation of C.R.S. 30-20-103 and Subsection 3.1.2 of the Solid Waste Regulations. There is some question as to whether or not this was a requirement at the time this facility was permitted. Such a report was required in the 1971 Amendments to the Solid Waste Act prior to the hearing by the Board of County Commissioners, but the Act requires such a report only "as may be required by the (State Health] Department by regulation." The State appears to have decided that no report was necessary as they treated the landfill as a grandfathered site. Regardless of the State's position, it appears that the Board of County Commissioners expected such a review and that one never occurred. A review of the files does not show that there ever has been an "approval" by the State Health Department, though there has been some correspondence in recent months. The only correspondence that could be construed as any kind of approval, was that of Dennis Hotovec, approving a change of operator. so long as the landfill continued to be operated in accordance with an operations plan, which apparently, has never existed. 2. The Central Weld Sanitary Landfill has operated without required Discharge Permits. This is a violation of Subsection 2.1.2. of the Solid Waste Regulations, and 25-8-501, Colorado Revised Statutes. 3. The Central Weld Sanitary Landfill contaminated the ground water. This is a violation of Subsection 2.1.4. of the Solid Waste Regulations. The facility has been notified of this violation by our Division on October 5. 1992, and also by the Colorado Department of Health on December 23, 1992. `Mold Pinot*. IIonian S 210 • Chuck Cunliffe, Planning Department Re: Central Weld SanitaryLandfill January 8, 1993 Page 2 4. The Central Weld Sanitary Landfill has allowed ponding of water onsite. This is a violation of Subsection 2.1.4., and 2.2.2. of the Solid Waste Regulations. 5. The Central Weld Sanitary Landfill has placed solid waste into the groundwater on this site. This is a violation of Subsections 2.1.4 of the Solid Waste Regulations, and will be a violation of Subsection 3.1.10 of the revised Solid Waste Regulations. These regulations are scheduled to become effective in April. 1993. 6. In the absence of any design and operations plan, the only basis for establishment of the parameters for the 1971 permits, are the representations of the applicant at the time the permits were considered by the Board of County Commissioners. Those representations did not contemplate a regional landfill with a life of thirty-five (35) years, but rather one with an expected life of less than twenty (20) years. The representations did not contemplate placing fill above the existing grade as Waste Services currently plans. (Reference Design and Operations Plan, Sheet it 7) The Colorado Department of Health has determined that violations outlined in #4 and #6 above constitute a public nuisance. Environmental Protection Services Division concurs with this determination. Consequently, we would request that these violations at the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, be brought to the attention of the Board of County Commissioners, in the form of a public bearing for probable cause. Should you need any additional information, please contact me. /jp-011 xc: Randolph L. Cordon, M.D., M.P.H.. Director, Weld County Health Department Lee Morrison, Weld County Assistant Attorney 04,4 9RAI ti WilDe. COLORADO CiI.1 [V JAN 1 4 1993 'fMr w_.._.. Rl�nwin.• Certified Letter No.: P 423 630 398 William J. Hedberg Waste Services Corporation 6037 77th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 Dear Mr. Hedberg: January 14, 1993 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 1517 . 16 AVENUE COURT GREELEY. COLORADO 80631 ADMINISTRATION (303) 3530586 HEALTH PROTECTION (303) 353-0535 COMMUNITY HEALTH (303) 353-0639 On December 20, 1992, a representative of the Environmental Protection Division of the Weld County Health Department inspected the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, located at 6037 77th Avenue, Greeley, in Weld County, Colorado. The purpose of the inspection was to inspect and assess the facilities compliance with the "Regulations Pertaining to Solid Waste Disposal Sites and Facilities" (The Regulations) as promulgated by the Solid Waste Disposal Sites and Facilities Act (The Act). Title 30, Article 20, Part 1, C.R.S., as amended. On the date of the December 20, 1992. field inspection, the following was observed, or has been observed previously: 1. This facility continues to discharge pollutants into state waters without an approved discharge permit. 2. This facility continues to allow water to pond on the eastern portion of the facility. 3. This facility continues to operate in the absence of an approved Design and Operations plan. 4. This facility has contaminated the groundwater beyond the facility property line. 5. Solid waste has been placed into groundwater at this site. 6. This facility is currently operating without an emissions permit. It has been documented that previously disposed solid waste is currently exposed to groundwater and that groundwater pollution has occurred at this location. As you are aware, subsection 2.1.4 of The Regulations states that "A site and facility operated as a sanitary landfill shall provide means of finally disposing of solid wastes on land in a manner to minimize nuisance conditions...." and that EXHIBIT William J. Hedberg Certified Letter No.: P 423 630 398 January 14, 1993 Page 2 "nuisance condition are those which may result from explosive gas, bird hazards, disease vectors, odors, windblown solid wastes or cover materials, open burning, water pollution...." This facility allows water to pond on the eastern portion of the site. According to subsection 2.1.4 this facility "shall provide adequate cover with suitable material and surface drainage designated to prevent ponding of water...." and subsection 2.2.2 which states "Surface waters shall be diverted from, or around. the disposal site and facility and its working face." The Central Weld Sanitary Landfill is currently operating without an emissions permit as required by the Air Pollution Control Commission of the Colorado Department of Health. In addition, this facility continues to discharge pollutants into state waters without an approved discharge permit. Operating without a discharge permit is a noncompliant activity according to Title 25, Article 8, Part 5, Colorado Revised Statutes, as amended. Both deficiencies are in violation of Subsection 2.1.2, of The Regulations which states in part "facilities shall comply with the health laws , standards, rules, and regulations of the department, the Water Quality Control Commission, the Air Quality Control Commission.... The operation of this facility in the absence of an approved Design and Operations Plan is a violation of 30-20-103 of The Act, as it states in part. "Such application shall....set forth the location of the site and facility: the type of site and facility; the type of processing to be used, such as sanitary landfill. composting, or incineration; the hours of operation; the method of supervision: the rates to be charged, if any: and such other information as may be required by the board of county commissioners. The application shall also contain such engineering, geological, hydrological, and operational data...." The Division has taken into consideration that a preliminary Design and Operations Plan, a remedial action plan, and a discharge permit have either been applied for or submitted, which address some of the above issues. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 353-0635. Sincerely. 17uu diC. LiC.i� Trevor Jiricek Solid and Hazardous Waste Specialist TJ-085 cc: Roger Doak. Colorado Department of Health Lee Morrison, Assistant Weld County Attorney Chuck Cunliffe, Weld County Planning Department Alan Scheere, Waste.Management of North America, Inc. Bill Webster, Weld County Commissioner RESOLUTION WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on September 22, 1971,z at 2:00 P. M., In the chambers of the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, for the purpose of hearing the petition of Weld County Landfill, Inc., Box 596, Evans, Colorado, requesting approval of site for a sanitary landfill, also known as a solid andlor liquid waste disposal business on the following described property, to wit: West Half of the Southwest Quarter (WSW?) and the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (SE;SW;) of Section 32, Township 5 North, Range 66 West of the 6th P. M., Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the petitioner was present and repreeentec'. by Earl Moffat, and WHEREAS, there was some opposition to the request of petitioner for the location of a sanitary landfill sit said location, and WHEREAS, the said requested sanitary landfill operation is located in an agricultural zone as set forth in the Weld County Zoning Resolution, and WHEREAS, according to Section 3. 3(2) of the Zoning Resolution of Weld County, said sanitary landfill operation may be authorized upon the approval of the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners heard all the testimony and statements of those present; has studied the request of the petitioner; and studied the recommendations of the Weld County Planning Commission, and having been fully informed; NOW, THEREFORE, 13E IT RESOLVED, by the Board of County Commissioners, Weld County, Colorado, that the application of Weld County Landfill, inc. to locate a sanitary landfill on the premises indicated above, be, and it hereby is granted under the conditions following: 1. That any sanitary landfill facility to be installed shall be approved by the State Health Department. 2. That all applicable subdivision regulationo and zoning regulations shall be followed and complied with in accordance with the Zoning Resolutions of Weld County, Colorado. ,Dated this 6th day of October, A.D., 1971. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO ATTEST: AYE 72/ NAY ' ,C -1 kLb i 1t,(i.:i Deputy County Clerk A CC. Landfill rc • S iO6i- WUDc. COLORADO January 18, 1993 Waste Services, Inc. C/O Waste Management P.O. Box 122283 Ft. Worth, Tx. 76121 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303) 3533845. EXT. 3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 1400 N. 17TH AVENUE GREELEY, COLORADO 80831 Subject: Violation Notice ZCH-96 on a parcel of land described as part of the W2 SW4 and the SE4 SW4 of Section 32, T5N, R66W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. Dear Sirs: A review of your property was conducted to determine if the Conditions of Approval placed on the property at the time SUP -116 was approved by the Board of County Commissioners are in compliance. The review revealed violations of Condition of Approval 1,1. John Pickle's memorandum dated January 8, 1993, and Trevor Jiricek's certified letter Number P423 630 398 dated January 14, 1993, outlines the violations of Condition of Approval #1 on the Board of County Commissioners' Resolution dated October 6, 1971. The Department of Planning Services is still evaluating the possibility of violations of Condition of Approval #2 on the Board of County Commissioners' Resolution dated october 6, 1971. You will be notified if violations are identified during the Department's evaluation. Copies of John Pickle's memorandum dated January 8, 1993, Trevor Jiricek's certified letter dated January 14, 1993, and the Board of County Commissioners' Resolution dated October 6, 1971 are enclosed for your review. The Use by Special Review area must be brought into compliance with the Conditions of Approval within 30 days from the dace of this letter. Noncompliance will result in our office scheduling a Probable Cause Hearing before the Board of County Commissioners. If the Board determines there is sufficient probable cause to warrant further action, a Show Cause Hearing will be scheduled to consider revocation of the Use by Special Review permit 116. If you have information that may clear up this matter. please call or write. Sincerely, � n` tat Chuck Cunliffe, AICP Director enclosures pc: William J. Hedberg Bill Jeffry �e Morrison, Assistant County Attorney hn Pickle, Weld County Health Department ijrzblk rat Pc Attorneys At Law 1775 Sherman Street • Suite 1300 Denver, Colorado 80203 (303) 861-1963 • Fax: (303) 832-4465 Ext. 123 January 18, 1993 Ms. Connie Harbert, Chairperson Weld County Commissioners 915 - 10th St., P.O. Box 758 Greeley, Colorado 80632 RE: Request For Hearing For Revocation of Certificate of Designation for Central Weld Sanitary Landfill Dear Chairperson Harbert: The Ashton -Daniels Neighborhood Association ("Neighborhood Association") and Sam and Myrtle Telep request the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County ("Board") to institute a Certificate of Designation Revocation proceeding with regard to the Central Weld County Landfill, under the provisions of C.R.S. 30-20-112, and, upon notice and public hearing, revoke the Certificate of Designation for the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill and require closure and remedial action measures which return the site to its original grade and prevent releases of contaminants into the environment, including groundwater and surface water. The Ashton -Daniels Neighborhood Association includes citizens of Weld County who own property in the vicinity of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Sam and Myrtle Telep own land which adjoins the Landfill. Members of the Telep family reside on the property. Operation of the Landfill has interfered with the use and enjoyment of the property of members of the Neighborhood Association, including Sam and Myrtle Telep. The land use approval for the Landfill was obtained as the result of representations made by the applicant, the Weld County Health Department, and the Department of Health at a hearing before the Board on September 22, 1971. These representations govern the land use approval for the site and apply to the original applicant and all subsequent owners and operators. Ms. Connie Harbert January 18, 1993 Page 2 Based on information and belief, the owners and operators of the Central Weld County Landfill include Waste Management of North America, Inc., Waste Services, Inc., Mr. Brad Keirnes, and the Keirnes family. A transcript of the tape recorded hearing of September 22, 1971, is attached hereto. The Neighborhood Association also requests the Board to commence a civil action to enjoin operation of the Central Weld County Landfill as a public nuisance and to require corrective action to abate the nuisance by restoring the land to its original grade and remediate releases of contaminants into the environment, including groundwater and surface water. The Neighborhood Association requests the Board to base its Certificate of Designation and Nuisance Abatement action on grounds which include the following: 1. The Central Weld County Landfill has been operated without an approved design and operations plan in violation of C.R.S. 30-20-103 and Subsection 3.1.2 of the Solid Waste Regulations of the Colorado Department of Health. At the Board's public hearing, it was represented to the Board that rules and regulations would be promulgated by the Colorado Department of Health governing engineering design and operation of the Landfill. (Hearing of September 22, 1971, at Page S.) All materials disposed of at this facility in the absence of an approved design and operations plan were illegally disposed of and should be ordered to be removed. 2. Solid waste has been disposed of in groundwater, con- trary to Subsection 2.1.4 of the Solid Waste Regulations and contrary to representations made on September 22, 1971, during the Board's public hearing by the applicant in obtaining the Certificate of Designation, which representations were material to the Board's decision to issue the Certificate of Designation. At the hearing it was represented that water pollution would not occur and that the land filling operation would cease if it did. (Hearing of September 22, 1971, at Pages 4 and 30.) All materials contacting groundwater or surface water, or leeching contaminants into groundwater or surface water, should be ordered to be removed. Ms. Connie Harbert January 18, 1993 Page 3 3. The Central Weld County Landfill has discharged pollutants into the waters of the State of Colorado and the United States, contrary to Subsection 2.1.2 of the Solid Waste Regulations, the Colorado Water Quality Control Act, C.R.S. 25-8- 501, and the Federal Clean Water Act. Such discharges should be ordered to cease immediately, and remedial action orders should be issued for the removal of contaminants from the environment which were released into the environment without a discharge permit. 4. Material representations were made to the Board at its public hearing of September 22, 1971, that the Central Weld County Landfill's operating life would be fifteen years, or shorter, if groundwater or other geologic constraints were encountered (hearing of September 22, 1971, at Page 28 and Page 41). The Landfill's operating life would be longer only if subsurface conditios so allowed. Based on such representations, the Certificate of Designation was issued by the Board, and said Certificate either contains an implied condition limiting the life of the Landfill to no more than fifteen years, which term has expired, or the Certificate of Designation was fraudulently obtained. In either circumstance, the term of years for operation of the landfill'has expired, the landfilling operation should be ordered to be terminated under the Certificate of Designation, and a closure and remedial action order should be entered. 5. The land use approval for the landfill was for burial below the surface of the ground, not for "air space" filling rights. Material representations were made on September 22, 1971, to the Board, during the Certificate of Designation hearing, that deposition into the landfill would not exceed the grade of the land which existed at the time the Board issued the Certificate of Designation, except for the possible cover of three to four feet of clean fill dirt, and that upon closure, the site would be graded or benched to conform with surrounding agricultural land uses. (Hearing of September 22, 1971, at Pages 16-17 and Pages 27-28.) No "air space" rights were applied for or granted by the Board, and the applicant represented that there was sufficient subsurface space and conditions to operate a landfill over a fifteen -year life below the surface. Despite these material representations, the pre-existing grade of the land has been altered and continues to be altered, contrary to the approved land use plan for the site under the Board's Certificate of Designation approval. Materials which cause the pre -landfill grade of the ground to be exceeded should be removed, and the site should be restored to the grade which existed at the time the Certificate of Designation was issued. Q:1061 Ms. Connie Harbert January 18, 1993 Page 4 6. The owners and operators of the landfill have allowed the ponding of water on the site, contrary to Subsections 2.1.4 and 2.2.2 of the Solid Waste Regulations. 7. The owners and operators of the Central Weld County Landfill have disposed of special wastes at the site without the required approvals. These wastes should be ordered to be removed. 8. The existence of the Central Weld County Landfill constitutes a public nuisance which should be enjoined, and the nuisance abated by restoration of the site to its pre-existing grade and removal of all materials which contact groundwater or surface water. 9. The facts and documents supporting revocation of the Certificate of Designation for the Central Weld County Landfill and abating the public nuisance caused by the Landfill are within the possession and control of the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, the Weld County Health Department, the Colorado Department of Health, Waste Services, Inc., Waste Management of North America, Inc., Mr. Brad Keirnes and the Keirnes Family. The Board should order Waste Services, Inc., Waste Management of North America, Inc., Mr. Brad Keirnes, and the Keirnes Family to produce for inspection and copying all documents and information which pertain to the Landfill and its operation throughout its existence. 10. Available information indicates that hazardous substances may have been released at the site. The County should investigate whether hazardous substances in reportable quantities have been released and, if so, whether the owners and operators of the site have complied with applicable reporting requirements, including the requirements of Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation & Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. S 9603. WHEREFORE, the Ashton -Daniels Neighborhood Group and Sam and Myrtle Telep request that the Certificate of Designation for the Central Weld County Landfill be revoked, that the landfill be determined to be a public nuisance, and that closure and remedial action orders be issued 1) for the restoration of the site to the grade which existed at the time the Certificate of Designation was issued, and 2) for removal of all materials which contact or cause the release of contaminants into the environment, including groundwater or surface water. S 1061 Ms. Connie Harbert January 18, 1993 Page 5 DATED this 18th day of January , 1993. Respectfully sub- mitted by the Ashton -Daniels Neighborhood Association. Kent E. Hanson 2°151O 885 Arapahoe Ave., Suite 216 Boulder, Colorado 80302 (303) 449-0600 GJH/det c: Gregory J. Hobbs, Jr. Hobbs, Trout & Raley, Jr. 1775 Sherman Street, Ste. 1300 Denver, Colorado 80203 (303) 861-1963 Ext. 123 Attorneys for Ashton -Daniels Neighborhood Associaiton, and Sam and Myrtle Telep • Weld County Department of Health ■ Colorado Department of Health • Mr. Tom David bc: Sam Telep Kent Hanson 11493104 Fe." OS Transcript of Tape on 1971 County Bearing Central Weld Landfill We'll call this Hearing to order. Docket No. 54 Weld Landfill Incorporated, Box 596, Evans, Colorado Date: September 22nd, 1971. Time: 2 o'clock Request site approval for sanitary landfill At this time Mr. Connell you will read the record. Connell: Mr. Chairman, pursuant to notice properly given pursuant to the zoning laws of the of State of Colorado, a Public Hearing is now held in the offices of the Board of County Commissioners, Weld County, Colorado, the Weld County Courthouse, concerning Docket No. 54, Application of Weld County Landfill Incorporated, Lots 596, Evans, Colorado. Hearing does come on at this time and date as published. Publication has been had in accordance with law in the Greeley Daily Booster as shown by the Certificate of Publication of the publisher of the Greeley Daily Booster. The request is for site approval for a sanitary landfill located in the west 1/2 of the SW 1/4 in the 1 Chairman: recorded in Book 1l1 by the Secretary of the Weld County Planning Commission. RESOLUTION favorably recommending to the Board of County Commissioners the approval of this site location and approval. Thank you. At this time we'll hear from the people supporting this application. All of you having anything to do with the cause, let's have your opinion. Voice 2: Yes Mr. Chairman. We, Weld County Health Department, approve of the site on the grounds that we figure it is well above the water level; we won't have any water problems at all, like we have down on the river. Also, it is within a quarter of a mile of a black top road and about a mile, that's from the south, with about a mile and three quarters from the north is the black top road. We have studied the engineering reports from the soils and from the well, record and log from the well, and, therefore, we recommend this application be approved. I have also Mr. Orville Stoddard from the Water Pollution Commission and I would like Mr. Stoddard to comment. Chairman: All right, that's fine with... Mr. Stoddard? Stoddard: Thank you. My name is Orville Stoddard with the Engineering Section of Colorado Department of Health. There is an Amended Act pertaining to the regulation of land disposal sites and facilities that Earl Moffatt 4 mentioned. This requires the applicant to submit a report of engineering, geological, hydrological, and operational data to the Department for review and recommended approval prior to issue of the Certificate of Designation by the County Commissioners. The site was visited with Mr. Moffatt, Glen Paul of the Weld County Health Department, and at that time the guidelines for developing this report were reviewed with Mr. Moffatt. He did submit a report to the Department, August 9th, 1971, and did have considerable information of the type that we were after. The information submitted indicate after studying the soils reports, the test borings, information on the existing water table, soil conditions in the area, that this site can be operated in accordance with sanitary landfill requirements. Also, the Department is required to develop and promulgate rules and regulations pertaining to the engineering design and operation. These are to be presented to the Board of Health at their regular meeting in October for adoption. This is a suitable site and can be operated as a sanitary landfill. The only question we have at this point in time, and Mr. Moffatt touched on that, is that there are several alternatives in how the operation should proceed and this is just a matter of deciding which is the best way to go. 5 Waldo: Moffatt: Waldo: bottom. If you'd stop, cement the ditch, I think you would probably atop the seep, because I don't think that premises itself is irrigated enough to runoff excessive or even if it was it would cause a seep, and practically got to be from that carrier ditch, or premises above might be, being irrigated. Now. I have another question. What are you going to do with this land when they get through with it, using it for a landfill. --� We intend to make a good piece of farm ground out of it because the surface amount of dirt and we intend to cover more than is required by any law. In other words we intend to cover enough we won't know this exactly how much is until we get in there and see what our bottom is. Then we can find our balance points where it's no longer economical to dig deeper over the whole dirt past their points, you see. Then we probably have about a 3 -foot or more, maybe 4 -foot of cover on that ground when we're through with it. And it will be on, it will either be on even grade that will be practical to irrigate or be benched; dropped down, then drawn out, you see. What will the elevations be like? How will they _.,.7 compare with the present elevations when you get this landfill completed? 16 ringt Moffatt: Waldo: Moffatt: Waldo: Moffatt: Well it will be flat across there, more or less, on the -- running east and west. But, of course, you can still have.... then we'll have to allow back off the premises or when they reach the other part of the that's one of the reasons we won't be working too far to the West. We're going to have a slope on this, you see. A slope at all then under the road and this will take extra dirt, too. There's depression, X wouldn't call it a draw, but it's a draw of sorts, it runs down, oh, in an easterly side of this west half, this west 80 acres, is it your intention to use all of that for landfill and fill that in? If it's practical so we can. There's no reason why we can't, you know, from water or making It appears to be pretty seepy and wet in there now. But I think if we intercept all of it., that seepage --by going clear through and going to the top we should be able to intercept these places where they come through and if necessary and we can head the drain up there and make an L shape and bring this all out to where daylight is--. That piece of ground should not have any seep within the L shape; should not have water left in it there if we intercept it. 17 in, and anything we take in on that $5,000 is returned to the County and credited off of the $5,000. For an example, the Windsor Landfill, this last year took enough in money even Kodak moving into that area and its off the County's back, they took in $5,000 or $7,000. Mikner: Well that's the reason I asked the question. Moffatt: Well, I want to make it clear, I've run into this before. The County's subsidizing everything you're doing. Well, the County is not subsidizing, only up to $5,000 and then any revenue that comes in is credited off of that five, so they get down, you see. Does that answer your question? Mikner: (Muffled] Waldo: Darryl (7) How long do you anticipate you could use this area for landfill. Moffatt: Well, Ralph, we're getting in a little better position to answer that now than when we first started because we know, and, of course, your area is growing and all these things, and then again we don't know how much of that ground we can actually use, just like we've been discussing, some of that ground might not be practical to do but we'll still try to turn it into something. But if we can use, say 80 acres of that ground to a depth of approximately 45 feet, I think 27 Voice 8: we'll have at least a 15 -year goal. At the present, ifs you increase it that much more for the cutdown (?). Ralph [Waldo], we figured around 60,000 population and we figure average about 5 lbs per person per day. So we figure about 300,000 lbs going into this place everyday and from there we figured anywhere from 15 to 25 years. That is if the conditions, like Earl stated, and you asking to stay away from the east side of the 80. Moffatt: So anything can influence it. If we can increase that 15 from what we planned, in other words if we go down to 80 and we find that we can work there practically, that's going to give you that much more time in that area. Now if it turns out that shale and sandstone is in there to the point to where it is not practical to move it, we've got to figure to balance the job out sooner, then that why I thought really conservative at 15 years, and they're trying to go further. Wagner: Now, these well.... Connell: If I could interrupt, before we go too far beyond his statement, can we have Mr. Wagner's full name and address for the record please? Wagner: Henry Wagner, 4603 83rd Avenue, Greeley, Colorado. Connell: Thank you, Mr. Wagner Wagner: 852-0347 28 C ride naa Waldo: Moffatt: Waldo: Moffatt: Waldo: Stoddard: laws and under your common sense, you're not going to lay this down in pockets to be collected. You're going to have to daylight all the water out that will come in around your landfill. What about the seep condition that there is on that westerly slope of that land.... Ralph, when you say west are you saying across the draw on the west side and coming back sloping east. I'm saying on the east side of the draw. That whole hillside is seeping. I agree, but I think we are going to decide, I think we are going to intercept that water, we're going to divide it cut it off and turn it back into the draw. That's what I think we'll find. All right, now that brings me to the next question. Mr. Stoddard if they can't cut that water off, then it will be your job to stop the landfill, is that right? Yeh, I have to agree, I think with Earl, we won't really know until we get into it more. Yes, it will have to be diverted either around the fill or, there are other ways of doing it. It can be piped underneath the fill with certain precautionary measures taken to keep any seepage into the culvert or whatever they use under the fill. The important thing that we will be looking at, of course, is to make sure that water 30 pollution does not occur from this operation in any way shape or form. Waldo: Row often will your department make an inspection. Stoddard: We're, we make annual inspections at this point in time and certainly think that your idea of more frequent inspections would be better. If they were; if they just found unsuitable it would be the job of your department not the Weld County Health Department to shut it down, or is it both departments? We're together on it. I mean, if Glen Paul thinks there's a problem there, then they would contact us and we would.... Ralph, I don't think there's any problem here that we don't have a solution. In other words, but we've got to determine whether it's practical, like we said, we can put a drag line underneath. You're talking Waldo: Stoddard: Moffatt: Waldo: Moffatt: Waldo: about a minute amount of you're not talking about Well, it just keeps Certainly, but once water that's coming at a time, a large body there. coming. you put it under control and put in a small pipe or pipe beside the cut, it won't increase because it still comes from a given point, see. Well, that kind of bothers me too, because we don't know what development there's going to be to the 31 It 7--kik rout &R_Ezi9; P C Attorneys At Law 1775 Sherman Street • Suite 1300 Denver, Colorado 80203 003) 861-1963 • Fax: (303) 832-4465 Ed. 123 February 15, 1993 Ms. Connie Harbert, Chairperson Weld County Commissioners 915 - 10th Street, P.O. Box 758 Greeley, Colorado 80632 Mr. Chuck Cunliffe Director, AICP Department of Planning Services Weld County Administrative Offices 1400 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 Mr. David Shelton, Director Hazardous Materials and Waste Management Division Colorado Department of Health 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South Denver, Colorado 80222-1.530 Mr. Tom David, County Attorney Weld County 915 - 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80632 RE: Violation Notice ZCH-96 of January 18, 1993, and Certified Letter to Waste Services Corporation Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, Dated January 14, 1993 Dear Ms. Harbert, Mr. Cunliffe, and Mr. Shelton: The Ashton -Daniels Neighborhood Association and Sam and Myrtle Telep sent the enclosed letter and attachments on January 18, 1993 to the Weld County Commissioners for the purpose of ensuring that the violations occurring at the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill are remedied in accordance with the law and the representations made to the Weld County Commissioners when the land use approval and Certificate of Designation for the landfill were obtained from Weld County. We enclosed a transcript which shows that the landfill authorization was obtained on the basis that the facility would not contaminate groundwater, would be in existence for fifteen years, and would be graded so that the natural ground level was maintained upon closure. LEXHIBIT A,0,-31 Connie Harbert, Chuck Cunliffe and David Shelton February 16, 1993 Page Two The conditions for approval of the landfill have been violated, and no operations plan can be approved which allows the natural surface of the ground to be exceeded in light of the representations made when the land use approval was given. To the extent that the Colorado Health Department and/or Weld County is considering an operations plan for the facility, it must include a condition restricting and prohibiting exceedence of the natural grade of the ground. However, our position is that no operations plan, and definitely no expansion of the facility, should be allowed. We believe that legal and technical review will demonstrate that the only appropriate plan and order for this facility consists of a closure and remedial plan to intercept and treat contaminated groundwater and surface water, and restore the natural grade. Sincerely, - Gregory J. Hobbs, Jr. for HOBBS, TROUT & RALEY GJH/det c: • Glenn Mallory • John Pickle • Lee Morrison GJH/det/2169311 001,64 ^ w Western Internet"I Music 3033307738 P.02 j istaift WIVDC. COLORADO MEMoRAnoum To From Subloot: Chuck Cunliffe. Planning John Pickle, Hea Central Weld Sanitary Landfill February 22. 1993 This memorandum is a follow-up to our meeting with Waste Management and Waste Services on February 18, 1993. Since that time, I have also met with Glenn Mallory, and Roger Doak, Solid Waste Division. and Pat Nelson, Water Quality Division, Colorado Department of Health. In response co these meetings, it is the opinion of this Division that the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill continues in a state of non-compliance. We submit the following areas of concern as violations: 1. The operators of the Central weld Sanitary Landfill have not submitted a complete Design and Operations Plan. (See attached letter of February 22, 1993). This is a violation of C.R.S. 30-20-103. 2. The Central Weld Sanitary Landfill continues to operate without required Discharge Permits. This is a violation of Subsection 2.1.2. of the Solid Waste Regulations, and 23-8-301, C.R.S. In conference with Pat Nelson, Water Quality Division, their position is that the absence of the required permits constitutes technical violation of the Rules; however, they are holding further enforcement in abeyance so long as as this facility continues to proceed in good faith with the Discharge Permit application process. Our Division agrees with this position. 3. The Central Weld Sanitary Landfill continues to contaminate the groundwater. A review of the Hydrogeologic and Ceotechnical Characterization and supporting documents indicate that a portion of this contamination is due to a lack of adequate cover and adequate surface drainage. This is a violation of Subsections 2.1.2 of the Solid Waste Regulations, specifically, 3.11.5 of the Water Quality Control Commission Rules, and 2.1.4. of the Solid Waste Regulations. In conference with Glenn Mallory and Roger Doak, Solid waste Division, Colorado Department of Health, their position is still as outlined in their letter of December 23, 1992. 4. The Central Weld Sanitary Landfill has allowed solid waste to come into contact with groundwater on this site. A review of the Hydrogeologic and Geotechnical Characterization and supporting documents indicate that this condition is due to a lack of adequate cover and adequate surface drainage. This is a violation of Subsections 2.1.2 of the Solid Waste Regulations, specifically. 3.11.3 of the Water Quality Control Commission Rules, and 2.1.4. of the Solid waste Regulations. In addition, this will be a violation of Subsection 3.1.10 of the revised Solid Waste Regulations, which are scheduled to become effective in April, 1993. Western Internat'l Music 3033307730 This Division. and the Colorado Department of Health continue to feel that item. 0 3 and 4 4 constitute a public nuisance. Consequently, we would request that these violations ba brought to the attention o£ the Board of County Commissioners, in the form of a public hearing. Should you need additional information, please contact me. EMV\3L2 XC: Lee Morrison, Assistant County Attorney Randolph Cordon, M.D., M.P.H. Glenn Mallory, Solid Waste Division David Holm, Water Quality Division 831061 fat; Wine COLORADO March 2, 1993 Waste Services Corporation 40000 Weld County Road 25 Ault, CO 80610 Subject: ZCH-96 Dear Sirs: DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303) 353.3845, EXT. 3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 1400 N. 17TH AVENUE GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 The Probable Cuase Public Hearing originally scheduled for March 24, 1993, HAS BEEN RESCHEDULED by the Board of County Commissioners. Notice is hereby given that on Monday, April 5, 1993, at 9:00 a.m., or as soon thereafter as the agenda of the Board of County Commissioners permits, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County will hold a Probable Cause public hearing pursuant to Section 81 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance and the policies and procedures of the Weld County Administrative Manual. This meeting will take place in the Commissioners' Hearing Room, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley. Colorado. The purpose of this public hearing will be to review Case Number SUP -116 for compliance with conditions of approval as approved by the Board of County Commissioners on October 6, 1971, to determine if probable cause exists to hold a hearing on revocation of SUP - 116. Mr. John Pickle, in his memorandum dated February 22, 1993, has identified the items of non-compliance with conditions of approval for SUP -116. A copy of his memorandum is attached. If it is determined at the public hearing that there is probable cause that you are not in compliance with SUP -116 the Board of County Commissioners will schedule a Show Cause public hearing to consider revocation of the Special Review permit. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call or write. Respectfully. C � Chuck Cun�, AZCP Director enclosure pc; William J. Hedberg Marian King Bill Jeffry Lee Morrison John Pickle F7,1081 si a 1111111c. COLORADO March 2, 1993 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303) 353.3845, EXT. 3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 1400 N. 17TH AVENUE GREE'_EY, COLORADO 80531 TO: SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS Subject: ZCH-96 NAME: Waste Services Corporation, c/o Waste Management FOR: Central Weld Sanitary Landfill LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the W2 SW4 and the SE4 SW4 of Section 32, T5N, R66W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: Approximately 1 1/2 miles northeast of the Town of Milliken. A Probable Cause Public Hearing originally scheduled before the Weld County Board of County Commissioners on Wednesday, March 24, 1993, HAS BEEN RESCHEDULED to Monday, April 5, 1993, at 9:00 a.m., or as soon thereafter as the agenda of the Board of County Commissioners permits, in the County Commissioners' Hearing Room, First Floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado. The purpose of this public hearing will be to review Case Number SUP -116 for compliance with conditions of approval as approved by the Board of County Commissioners on October 6, 1971, to determine if probable cause exists to hold a hearing on revocation of SUP -116. You are receiving this notification because your property is within five -hundred (500) feet of the property being reviewed. All persons in any manner interested are requested to attend and may give testimony pertaining to the uses occurring on the approved site, For additional information write or telephone, Chuck Cunliffe. 00000000000000000 TEL No.000 Mar.16.93 1O 25 P.07 fEmORAIMU ve Mum Seepst VILE March 10, 1993 Dee Traver Jiricek, Solid and gazardcus Waste Specialist central Meld Sanitary LT, complaint on March 9, 1993, this Division received a complaint concerning the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill pumping water from its on site retention pond to a alfalfa field east of the landfill, this property is owned by Art Garcia. Upon arriving at the landfill I inspected the area which was reported in the complaint. From the county road, I observed a pump in place on the retention pond and a "irrigation type" line running through a culvert under the county road and onto Mr. Garcia's property. This line extended approximately loon feet. This was documented with 9 photographs (attached). I then contacted Bill Hedberg at the landfill office in regard to the complaint. Mr. Hedberg stated that a discharge of this nature wou:.d not requite a discharge permit from the Water Quality Control Division, but that their attorneys were reviewing the situation to insure that. Mr. Hedberg stated the pump was only engaged to "prime" the system. He stated it ran for lass than five minutes. Tha flow of water if pumped would run across Mr. Garcias field then under a county road and across another field also owned by Kr. Garcia, any surplus water would ultimately flow into the Big Thompson River. l will attempt to obtain an interpretation from C.D.H. in regard to this discharge. tit APR 1 '93 14153 FROM WELD CO TREASURER TO t632446S PACE -017/01T 4r, mEfORAIMUtf1 Pram suorct Chuck Cunliffa, Planning John Pickle. Rea Central Weld Sanitary Landfill March 30. 1993 On March 2, 1993, Trevor Jiricek of our staff inspected the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. The purpose of the inspection was to acq.Rn the facility's compliance with the "Regulations Pertaining to Solid Wait. Disposal Site's and facilities-, as promulgated by the Solid Waste Dispncal Sites and Facilities Act, Title 30, Article 20, Part 1. C.R.S. The facility ronti.nmes in memo rn yne of 2-21-92! 1. The operators have not submitted a complete Design and Operations Plan. a Stitt of non-compliance ac previously cited in my 2. The Control Weld Sanitary Landfill continues to opetate without roquircd Discharge Permits. 3. The Central Weld Sanitary Lemdfill continues to contaminate the groundwater. 4. The Central Weld Sanitary Lanc!i11 has allowed solid waste to coma. Into cuncaci. with groundwater on this site. I met niSh hill Hedberg, Site Manager on "larch 23, 1993. Although we primarily discussed ether matters, no mention was made of any change in these areas of non- aauyliance. In addition. I have received nothing to date with regard to same. If you have further questions, please contact Trevor Jiricek or me. EXHIBIT I A,b.- 31 ** TOTAL PAOE.01^ ** 531061 Saltos: April 3, 1993 Glenn Billings 2720 19 TH St. Drive #1 Greeley, CO 80631 Board of County Commissioners: Due to a business commitment I am unable to attend the public hearing on the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. As one of the three County Commissioners, I voted against this landfill during the original public hearings in 1971. I've listed my reasons for voting against this landfill in 1971 as: 1. All requirements for approval were not met. 2. A high water table (such as the one around the Milliken Landfill) is not conducive to any landfill operations. 3. The location of the Milliken Landfill was poor. It is in a direct drainage that flows down hill into the Big Thompson River. 4. The landfill would have adverse effect on the intense agricultural operations in the area. 5. The landfill was too close to a large residential area (Dos Rios). These same issues negatively impact any present or future use of this facility. Sincerely, 2t,< -u /rJeelee.eir Glenn K. Billings Former Chairman of the Weld County Commissioners EXHIBIT I A.O.-L{1 S:11061 STATEMENT QF ALBIIQN CARL._ SQN 1. I am over the age of 21 and own land in Weld County not far from Central Weld Landfill. 2 I am a trained geologist currently employed as an environmental scientist by State of New Mexico Environment Department. 3. I believe I would qualify as an expert in the fields of geology, hydrology and environmental regulatory issues in a court of law. 4. Because I am unable to attend a hearing regarding this landfill to be held on Monday, April 5, 1993 due to a schedule conflict I am submitting this statement to counsel for landfill opponents to be read aloud and to be submitted on my behalf as part of the written public record. 5. I have made independent studies of geology and water flows in slough and wetland areas east of Central Weld Landfill and have lifelong familiarity with the landfill site, its charactenstics and localized conditions and have had opportunity to review public record documentation. Central Weld Landfill as currently sited and operated does not meet applicable county, state and federal regulations as set forth below: Central Weld Landfill as currently sited does not meet current Subtitle D siting criteria as set forth below: 6. The footprint of Central Weld Landfill is located in historic year-round wetlands and slough area, draining into the Big Thompson River and into historic Spottier Lake, adjacent wetlands, man-made ponds and ditches which function as areas of significant ground water recharge as may be seen in aerial photos of the site prior to landfill designation. 7. Central Weld Landfill is located in high water table area where water flow is encountered a few feet below the surface of the ground. A. Inspection of the perimeter of Central Weld Landfill reveals deep, wide, steep -slope trenches constructed in 1991 as part of a french drain and perimeter ditch system to intercept year-round water flow percolating through the biomass and to "maintain groundwater levels at elevations below the base of refuse [waste]." 9. Natural year-round springs were located on the landfill site and can be identified on aerial photos of the landfill site taken prior to excavation and dumping operations on the site. 10. Central Weld Landfill is underlain by weathered shales, clays and clayey -silty soils. 11. Wetting and drying of clayey soils in the area expands and contracts them creating a phenomenon known as piping or conduit formation which transfers water laterally and vertically as fast as water can flow eventually to the depth of formations that contains clay. 12. The soils of the Central Weld Landfill area do not resemble typical dryland soils but arc mature indicating area of high moisture due in significant part to intensive irrigation activity in area. 13, Characterization of the site as semiarid with mean annual rainfall of about 11 inches per year for the landfill site is deceiving and inapplicable. Relative humidity is more than 50% due to intensive irrigation practices and year-round subsurface water flow in the area belies the semiarid characterization, iEXHIBIT 4.0--12- 4 10fi1� 14. High rates of water flow onto landfill site from Knister Farms on the north side of the landfill during growing season (early water to harvest) impacts the landfill during four months of the year in amounts equivalent to rates for tropical rainfall or wet climates. 15, The base of the refuse and biomass is currently below the water level in Central Weld Landfill. 16. Waste in groundwater is sufficient for closure of a landfill in Ncw Mexico and it was drafted the same in Colorado prior to February 4, 1993, when officers of Western Region of Waste Management of North America wrote to Glenn Mallory of the Colorado Department of Health requesting that he oversee approval process to reword the second sentence of Section 3.1.10 to state that "The operation of sites and facilities that place waste into groundwater after the effective date of these regulations is prohibited" 17. By way of analogy, corresponding New Mexico solid waste and landfill regulations arc unaltered and state that waste shall not be introduced into the water table in landfills, prohibit burying trash below the groundwater table and prohibit landfill operators from burying waste within 100 feet of an identified water table. These regulations apply to all landfills without regard to age or date of commencement. 18 In the letter of February 4, 1993. Waste Management personnel also submit a proposal requesting Glenn Mallory of CDH to oversee approval process to reword final Colorado solid waste regulations to permit field filtering prior to laboratory analysis of groundwater samples taken from monitoring points or discharge points. 19. It is unreasonable to conclude based on a "relatively dry zone identified during site drilling within the weathered bedrock," that "communication between the uppermost saturated zone and deeper zone" and deep aquifers such as the northern reaches of the Laramie -Fox Hills is "minimal." Relative to what? Significant contamination of groundwater and aquifers cannot be ruled out to a scientific degree of certainty. 20. Excavation of massive trenches along the north boundary of the landfill seeking to intercept massive seasonal water flow and year-round springs impacting this site, distant tectonic events, unstable areas, shifting pressures, movement and settlement within the biomass itself may contribute to additional fracture of upper and lower weathered bedrock units and create new pathways for significant flow of leachate-contaminated plumes extending under and past current legal boundaries of the landfill, 21. Central Weld Landfill has no buffer zones on any side. 22. Central Weld Landfill has no liners. 23. Saturated upper groundwater zones and saturated waste forming leachatc is carried into pipes and localized fracture zones within weathered shales and bedrocks in the area. 24, Increased height proposals to achieve optimal slopes for final elevations and cover of the of biomass and proposed French drains will cause of site contaminated water flow to move in new directions including downgradient via gravity flow onto Knister Farms land which will become a total reversal of historic flow. 25. Berms created by the landfill operators in conjunction with construction of the trench and french drain system of perimeter water control currently backup water onto Knister land creating new seep areas which have become unusable and unf,^,rmable. 26, The Environmental Protection Agency delegated implementation of the mandatory NPDES program to the state of Colorado in 1975, On information and belief and pursuant to review of public files and 331064 notes from meetings of the Ashton Community Action Group, I was unable to find any application by Keimes during landfill operations in the 1980's or Waste Services during its operation of the site during the past two years for required Colorado or federal point source discharge permits until an application for 9 sample points was finally submitted to CDH by the operators of Central Weld Landfill on November 25, 1992, including a discharge permit for the point source discharge of the landfill underdrain emptying into Spomer Lake, until after this oversight was brought to the attention of the Weld County Health Department and Colorado State Health Department by David Hayes and Jon Stephens raising questions on behalf of his wife and sister-in-law (resident and property owners immediately adjacent to the landfill on the South and west) since they observed Spomer Lake become unable to support fish species and the crops planted on their sidchill wither and die when irrigated by water contaminated from Central Weld County Landfill discharge point LF-UD. 27. Monitoring and sampling of test wells and discharge points as submitted to Colorado Department of Health as recently as March 9, 1993, by Waste Management in-house testing methods and results reveal numerous "SU" characterization of test results, i.c., "The analysis of the surrogate with this sample did not meet the acceptance criteria of the method." 28. As of March 19, 1993, I was unable to locate an approved Design and Operations Plan for Central Weld Landfill although one was required to be submitted by the operator for approval in 1971 as a condition of the Certificate of Designation. 29. Based upon years of analyzing practical economic and technologic feasibility of measures called for in site -specific closure and remediation orders from the point of view of operators cited for regulatory violations, regulators, and others such as plan proponents as well as opponents, I want to bring the attention of Weld County Commissioners to the following: 30. A purchaser of a landfill acquires no vested rights to derive economic gain from, or to continue or expand, any kind of waste disposal operation at a site. Any proposals for change of use or proposed expansion of waste disposal use or related activities at any site arc separate issues. 31, Under applicable laws and regulations regarding solid waste landfills, purchasers of existing landfill sites assume all risks, including loss of projected revenue or costs of landscaping, remediation, monitoring and post -closure site work as a result of a closure order for cause at any time. A purchaser of a landfill has ample (a) opportunity, (b) duty of due diligence, and (c) incentive under present laws, to do adequate site investigation of a landfill administrative and operating history to make a reasoned purchase decision, weighing and balancing their assumption of risks which arc known, discoverable by due diligence, or should have been known. Routine environmental audit of this property by sophisticated purchaser Waste Management would have revealed numerous areas of concern due to activities of potentially responsible parties ("PRPs") as well as lack of adequate governmental file review and oversight based upon county, state and federal laws in effect on all dates relevant to this landfill. Dated: April 3, 1993 ALBION CARLSON S 3:.461. SENT BY: 4- 3-93 ; 12:48 ; KINKO'S SANTA FE— 3033524074;» 4 rotes from meetings of the Ashton Comnmmty Action Group, I was unable to find any appticaaoe by Keirna during landfill operation in the 1980's or Waste Services during its operation of the site duties the past two years for required Colorado or fade al point Source discharge permits until an application for 9 sample points was finally submitted to CDII by the operators of Central Weld Landfill on November 25, 1992, including a discharge permit for the point solute discharge of Ate landfill underdrain emptying into Spouts Lake, until after this oversight via brought to the attention of the Weld County Health Department and Colorado State Health Department by David Mayes and Jon Stephens miring coeditins on behalf of his wile and sinterdn-law (resident and ptoptKy owners itnmodiatcly Sent to the landfill on the South and tstsl) since they observed Spomer Lake become unable to suppon fish species and the crops planted on their sidehUl wither and Me when irrigated by utter contaminated from Canal Weld County Landfill discharge point LF-UD 27 Monitoring and sampling of teat welts and discharge penile at submitted to Colorado Department of Health AS recently as March 9, 1993, by Waite Management +n -house tasting methods and results reveal numerous "SL cbaracterieabon of test results, i.e., 'The analysis of the surrogate with this sample did not meet the acceptance criteria of the method." 28. AS Of March 19, 1993, I wet unable to locate an approved Desists and ()pennons Plan for Central Weld Landfill although one was required co be submitted by the opr aloe for approval in 1971 as a condition of the Certificate of Designation. 29. Based upon years of analyzing practical economic and technologic feasibility of measures called for in site -specific closure and tr.-mediation orders from the point ofvztw of operators cited for regulatory violations, rogulalors, and others such at plan proponents as well as opponents, I want to bring the attention of Weld County Commissioners to the following. 30. A purchaser oC a landfill acquires no vested rights to derive 000norruc pin from, or to continue or expand, any kind of waste disposal operation at a site Any proposals for change of use or proposed expansion of waste disposal use or related activities at any sire art separate ace 31. Under applicable lasts and regnladons regarding solid wage landfills, purchasers of existing landfill sites asawne all risks, including loss of projected reverse or costs of landscaping. remediation, monitoring and cost-elotare site work u a result of a.closure order for cause at any time. A purcbaser of a landfdl has ample (a) opportuuie', (b) duty of due diligeoce and (c) incentive under present laws, to do adequate site investigation of a landfill administrative and opasting history to make s reasoned purchase decision, weighing and balancing their assumption of tithe which are known, discoverable by due diligence, CO should have been known. Routine environmental audit of this property by aoplusticated purchaser Waste Management wpould have revealed numerous areas of concern due to activities of potentially rrepansible patties (0, f1W) as well as lack or adequate govenunental file review and overnight based upon county, state and federal laws in ebct on all dates relevant to this landfill. Dated; Apr11 3, 1993 ALBION CARLSON ' ' -44 �� EVALUATION OF EXISTING SANITARY LANDFILLS IN WFT,n COUNTY AS HAZARDOUS WASTE DISPOSAL SITES SEPTEMBER 1975 Prepared by: Orville P. Stoddard, P. E. Thomas M. Tistinic Engineering Section Colorado ➢epartment of Health Approved by: George A. Prince, P. E. Chief, F1agineering Section Colorado Department of Health 4?��O& I. Purpose and Scope This report was requested by Dr. Yoder, Director of the Weld County Health Department to designate a disposal site in Weld County as a hazardous waste site. The purposes of this report are to evaluate the suitability of existing sites and facilities and to make recommendations for the location and operation of an approvable hazardous waste site and facility. IT, Conclusions 1. Pesticide containers from applicators and residues from pesticide formulators are sources of hazardous wastes in Weld County. 2. All existing landfill sites are located in aquifer re— charge areas, flood plains or irrigated farmlands or near population centers. Surface and ground water pollution or air pollution can result from improper disposal of pesticide containers at any of these sites. A report and plan for receiving and disposal at a selected site has not been developed. 3. Liquids and residues from pesticide use, formulation and container washing operations are hazardous waste requiring special storage processing and disposal. 4. Hazardous waste, not acceptable for disposal at a specially designated landfill site, is a responsibility of the generator. 1 23i0F1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. Purpose II. Conclusions III. Recommendations IV. Discussion V. Hydrological Evaluation of Existing Sites 1 1-2 2-3 3-6 A. Proximity to Flood Plains 7 B. Proximity to Aquifer Recharge Area 8-9 Including Surface Water and Stre ma C. Depth to Water Table Including Nearest 9-10 Use or Subsurface Discharge D. Precip.tation and Discharge 10-11 E. Wind Erosion and Natural Barriers r1 F. Seismic Activity and Faults 11-12 G. Proximity to Growth Areas 12-13 H. Transportation Routes, Accessibility, 13 and Security I. Existing Land Use 13-14 J. Map Explanation 14-21 VI. A. Geological Map of Weld County B. County Powers and Functions - "Solid Waste Disposal Sites and Facilities" C. Department Regulations S31061 I. Purpose and Scope This report was requested by Dr. Yoder, Director of the Weld County Health Department to designate a disposal site in Weld County as a hazardous waste the suitability recommendations hazardous waste TT. site. The purposes of this report are to evaluate of existing sites and facilities and to make for the location and operation of an approvable site and facility. Conclusions 1. Pesticide containers from applicators and residues from pesticide formulators are sources of hazardous wastes in Weld County. 2. All existing landfill sites are located. in aquifer re— charge areas, flood plains or irrigated. farmlands or near population centers. Surface and ground water pollution or air pollution can result from improper disposal of pesticide containers at any of these sites. A report and plan for receiving and disposal at a selected site has not been developed. 3. Liquids and residues from pesticide use, formulation and container washing operations are hazardous waste requiring special storage processing and disposal. L. Hazardous waste, not acceptable for disposal at a specially designated landfill site, is a responsibility of the generator. 1 5. A feasibility study for locating, designing and operating a hazardous waste site and facility has not been made. The acceptable method of financing has not been determined. III. Recommendations 1. Disposal site operators should be instructed not to receive hazardous waste materials, at existing disposal sites, unless the site has appropriate authorization from the Weld County Commissioners. The amounts receivable should be minimized by advising the generator to use these wastes for the intended purpose or neutralizing at the source. 2. An engineering report and operation plan should be developed and approved by the Department for a disposal site designated to receive empty pesticide containers. It should consider hydro -geological conditions; sources, types and condition of containers; method of disposal, records and monitoring procedures. 3. Left over pesticides, residues from pesticide formulations or container washing operations must be excluded from disposal sites unless authorized by the County Commissioners. A prerequisite for authorization is an engineering report and operation plan approved by the Department. k. The generator of hazardous waste not received at designated landfills should provide for on site storage facilities 1 and transportation to appropriate sites in another State. 2 5. It is recommended that a consulting engineering firm with competence in chemical engineering be retained by the Weld County Commissioners to determine the feasibility of providing a hazardous waste processing facility and disposal site in Weld County and inves- tigate financing alternatives. IV. Discussion Hazardous waste is any waste or combination of wastes that poses a substantial danger to human, plant or animal life. Special precautions must be taken in handling, processing and disposal of these materials. They may be toxic chemicals; acids or caustics; explosives; or flammables. A review of sources of hazardous waste generated in Weld County indicates there is a need to dispose of hazardous material including pesticide residues and containers from formulators and applicators. Initially, an engineering report and plan for disposal should be developed which considers sources, quantities and types of hazardous waste. After review by the commissioners, recommended approval by this Department, comments of the Weld County Health Department and public hearing, a proposed site and facility may be designated. The existing landfill sites were designated prior to the requirement for engineering reports and operation plans. Therefore geological, hydrological and operational data on specific sites are lacking. Available data are inadequate for this Department to approve any of the existing sites as suitable for hazardous waste processing and/or disposal. 3 eat The problems associated with improper land disposal of hazardous wastes have not been recognized by the public, although damages may be severe and difficult to remedy. Air and water control programs have diverted many of these materials to the land for disposal. The problem is manifested in groundwater contamination by leachate, air pollution by open burning, evaporation, and wind erosion; poisonings by direct contact and through the food chain; fires and explosions at land disposal sites. Nationally, it is estimated that hazardous wastes comprise only 5 percent of the total solid waste generated. However, the environmental impact is much greater. Approximately 40 percent by weight of these wastes are inorganic, 60 percent organic. It is also estimated 90 percent exists in liquid or semi -liquid form. There are damage reports of arsenic poisoning in Minnesota from landfilling grasshopper bait contamination of soil, surface and groundwater on farmland in Illinois from disposal of metal finishing wastes on land; a fatality at a New Jersey landfill caused by exploding chemicals, to name a few, Some are a result of disposal practices 30 years ago and others a result of current disposal practices. General categories of hazardous wastes are toxic chemical, L ?^F.O. r :r- flammable, explosive, and biological. These can be in form of solids, liquids or gases. Technology for the proper treatment and disposal of hazardous waste is generally available. However, the lack of regulation and economic incentive discourage the use of acceptable treatment and land disposal methods. Treatment processes include volume reduction, component separation, detoxification, disposal and storage. Methods of disposal on land include mixing with soil for hip -degradation, aerobic or anaerobic ponds, filtration through natural or imposed media, encapsulation and permanent disposal. The use of a deep well injection method for disposal is an alternative which requires considerable study and investigation prior to approval. The sources, amounts and types of hazardous waste generated in the "front range corridor" have not been surveyed. Presently, the requirement is to transport hazardous and toxic wastes to appropriate disposal sites in other States. However, some questionable materials are being currently received at the Lowry Bombing Range site in Arapahoe County. Several chemical fires have occurred/in the chemical disposal pits recently. It is estimated that million gallons of industrial sludges are disposed of annually at this site. The portion considered hazardous or toxic is not known. Should a hazardous waste processing and disposal site be designated 5 S t;1 Ofi1 in Weld County, it may receive much of these materials presently being received at Lowry and other sites. These increased quantities may improve the feasibility for recovery of materials. The procedures for designating a hazardous waste processing and disposal site by the Board of County Commissioners are the same as for a sanitary landfill. However, the required engineering report and operation plan must include sufficient data to ensure compliance with stringent criteria for hazardous waste processing and disposal. The following is an evaluation of existing designated landfill sites in Weld County, as to the suitability of these sites for disposal of hazardous materials. Many of these waste materials can be extremely toxic, water soluble, persistent after disposal, and dangerous to operating personnel, persons using the disposal site or in vicinity of the site. V. Hydrological Evaluations of Existing Sites This phase of the screening and selection process will include a map and literature survey and a prelimi.na_ry analysis of existing landfill facilities in Weld County. This study will try to determine the feasibility of designating an existing landfill as a hazardous waste disposal site. The screening process is not as a detailed engineering report. 6 Criteria to be used in evaluating existing sanitary landfills: A. Proximity to flood plains, B. Proximity to aquifer recharge areas, including surface waters and streams. C. Depth to water table, including nearest use or subsurface discharge of underground water. D. Precipitation and drainage. E. F. G. H. I. A. Wind erosion potential and natural barriers. Seismic activity and faults. Proximity to growth areas. Transportation routes, accessibility, and security. Existing land use. Proximity to flood plains The overall drainage pattern in Weld County is dendritic resulting in a high degree of interrelationship between streams and rivers. Pollution of any part may result in pollution of the whole, especially during periods of flooding. Information on flood plains was provided by the Weld County Planning Office. Their map is based upon soil association data. Therefore, a detailed engineering study is necessary in selection of a hazardous waste disposal site and facility to insure adequate protection from flooding. 7 22:61()A B. Proximity to aouifer recharge area, including surface waters and streams. All aquifer recharge areas must be protected from the possibilities of pollution. Pollution of a recharge area may affect a user miles away. Care must be taken not to diminish the capacity or water quality of the aquifer, for in many areas in Weld County underground water is the major source of water for agricultural and domestic purposes. Inorganic solutions pass readily through soil and, once introduced, may not be removable. Because natural dilution is slow, induced flushing is expensive, and treatment is impractical. The effects of pollution may continue for a long period of time. In Weld County the major aquifers are situated in alluvial valleys, comprised of mostly sand and gravel underlying the major streams. Since these areas are locally recharged and fors a hydraulic link with the streams flowing over them., careful investigation must be made before disposing of any hazardous waste material to insure underground water storage is not irreparably damaged. Information for our preliminary investigation was provided through a generalized map of aquifer recharge areas supplied by the Colorado Land Use Commission, recharge areas to include major reservoirs and streams. We feel that not only should these areas be avoided, but also a buffer zone to extend beyond 8 23 Og! the zone of recharge should be considered. Prior to selecting a site a thorough study of surface water hydrology must be under- taken. Such a study should include rates and directions of surface runoff, historical flow cn surface streams, ditches, drains, and canals, and all other pertinent hydrological data on other surface waters. C. Death to water table, including nearest use or subsurface discharge. Acceptable conditions for the location of a hazardous waste disposal site include an area with essentially no water table. A geological investigation of a hazardous waste site will be necessary to determine the depth to water table, including nearest use or subsurface discharge, and effective porosity and permeability of the surrounding media. Naturally, the greater the distance any possible leachate from the landfill has to travel, the less chance of any possible pollution of any water source. However, in dealing with hazardous materials, great care will have to be taken to assure that any materials not readily removed by the major mechanisms of decreasing concentrations in the subsurface, be contained. For our purposes, the major mechanisms involved in decreasing concentrations of dissolved solids in an effluent are sorption and bacterial action. Sorption is the attachment of dissolved ions to rock minerals, generally by electro-bonding forces. Bacteria use any organic material in the effluent for food. Earth materials with a high percentage of clay sized particles are the most efficient in attenuating dissolved solids from wastes. 9 0 0A1 It would be desirable to contain this leachate in the most efficient and economical way. A natural subsurface high in clay materials will greatly reduce the chances of any pollutant reaching surface or groundwater. Therefore, the acceptable location of hazardous waste site will be located in an area far removed from any wells or springs and with a sufficient depth and quality of underlying material capable of containing any leachate escaping from the site. A thorough study of geological and hydrological conditions will be necessary in evaluating a possible hazardous waste site. This study should include but not be limited to: soil down to the bedrock formation, depth and thickness of all formations underlying the possible site, dip and strike of all subsurface formations, data on all possible water tables, annual fluctuations in these water tables, piezometric surface and gradients, and permeability and porosity of all major shale between ground surface and bedrock. D. Precipitation and discharge. The acceptable areas for hazardous waste locations will be those with low permeability materials in composition. Requiring that the landfill be located in these areas will not be sufficient if the effects of precipitation and drainage are not considered. The county has less than 15 inches of precipitation a year, mainly in the form of thunderstorms. Locally, severe weather can result 10 in large amounts of precipitation in short periods of time. Natural drainage must be diverted around the perimeter of the landfill. Naturally, the less water to enter the fill area, the less leachate produ.ed. It may be necessary to provide facilities for the collection and treatment of leachate in an area of low permeability. Wind erosion potential and natural. barriers. As stated in the regulations for solid waste disposal sites and facilities "the design shall contemplate the location and construction of the disposal site and facility in such a manner as will eliminate the scattering of windblown debris. All solid wastes discharged at the site shall be confined to the site and any material escaping from the active discharge area shall be promptly retrieved and placed in the active discharge area." Not only will the potential site have to be adequately fenced, but also a survey will be needed to determine potential wind erosion, frequency, and velocity of wind. Natural land barriers can minimize or accentuate the . effects of wind. Land formations may either help block out the force of the wind or create natural wind tunnels thus increasing its detrimental effects. Hazardous waste may be • F. in a form that can become airborne. Seismic activity`' and faults. Observations reveal that earthquakes have a variety of effects 11 s 1o&1. on groundwater. Most spectacular are sudden rises or falls of eater levels in wells, changes in discharge of springs, appearance of new springs, and eruptions of water and mud out of the ground. Fractured rocks and faults are relatively inefficient in removing dissolved solids because the surface area provided for sorption is so small. Faults in underground formations have the undesirable capability of extending them- selves to the surface, thus allowing for the possibility of leachates being transmitted into the subsurface at a relatively high concentration. For these reasons, it will be necessary to compile a report of the seismic activities in the area under study over a long period of time and to investigate subsurface geology for the possibility of large faults. If we consider the Pierre shale as a possible location, major faults could probably be recognized by any large displacements or offsets between the contact of the shale and overlying or surrounding formations. Minor faults could probably not be recognized because the weathering may obscure any evidence of fault. Also, clay may seal the fault to any movement of water along the fault. G. Proximity to growth areas. Weld County has shown a great potential growth, especially in the urbanized areas. The Weld County Planning Office has compiled a map indicating existing urban areas and future town 12 ell ORA! growth areas. It would be desirable and necessary to locate a possible hazardous waste site well beyond those areas of potential growth. Although strict guidelines as to the disposal of these waste materials will be followed, one must not over look the possibility of spills, leachates, and the mixing of potentially incompatible waste materials. Due to the hazard of the possible release of toxic substances, however small, it is imperative these sites be located where the possibility of these toxic materials coming in contact with humans is minimal. H. Transportation routes, accesstb4lity, and security. The location of a hazardous waste site should provide for convenient and safe access from the major generators of the hazardous material. Access routes should provide orderly and efficient traffic flow to and from the site and within the site. Tne site should be located far enough from a major thoroughfare to ensure the safety of the people and yet be close enough to allow easy access to the site without danger to the cargo and driver. The site should be located in such an area as to provide for that security necessary to prevent trespassing and vandalism. .. Existing land use. As stated in the Weld County Comprehensive Plan "The land of Weld County has always been bounteous to its farmers and to the people of Colorado and the nation. Weld County ranks first in agricultural productivity of all counties in Colorado and second of all counties in the nation. 13 S 2.1.0g1, The 1969 U. S. Census of Agriculture shows that the value of all farm products sold in Weld County totaled $317,410,295 and 0. accounted for 30% of all farm products sold in Colorado. Weld County has long been known as a breadbasket for the people of Colorado and the United States." This rich agricultural _and must be considered a major asset to the State of Colorado and the United States as well. All care must be taken to insure that none of this rich farmland is harmed or destroyed through inadequate planning. For our preliminary survey we are using a general soil map of Weld County provided by the Weld County Planning Office. This is a generalized map compiled from detailed and reconnaissance soil surveys and in part from interpretations. For these reasons, when selecting a possible site for the disposal of hazardous wastes, a detailed soil map need be used along with on -site descriptions for more detailed decisions. We will limit our survey to those areas not used for irrigated agricultural purposes. Map Explanation There was no complete map of Weld County taking into consideration all the factors previously discussed. Information had to be gathered from many sources, and most of that was at best in- complete. Maps and U. S. Geological Survey Water Supply Papers 14 were provided by Stephen D. Schwochow and David C. Shelton of the Colorado Geological Survey and John C. Romero of the Division of Water Resources. All existing landfills are located in undesirable areas for the disposal of hazardous waste materials. The area most desirable would be that area in the Pierre shale in the Southeast corner of the Weld County panhandle. Preliminary investigations indicate this area: (1) Is not located on a major flood plain. (2) Is not an aquifer recharge area, drainage would be to the NW. (3) Has essentially no water table, except those areas in which wells are drilled into the overlying sandstone. (L) Has no unusual problems with precipitation or drainage. (5) Has no unusual problems with wind erosion. (6) Shows no evidence of it being an area of seismic activity or severe faulting. Is not located near any large cities or major growth areas. Is fairly accessible by the Burlington Northern Railroad to the NW and by Highway 14 to the East and West and by Highway 71 to the North and South. The physiographic region to be one of shallow to deep rolling hardlands and nearly level hardlands. Land Resource Areas of Colorado describe the area as follows: (7) (8) (9) 15 (1) Elevations range from 3,500 to 5,500 feet (2) Relief nearly level to gently undulating with slopes from 1 to 5%. Numerous small areas of rolling topography with slopes up to 8%. (3) Precipitation: 15 to 17 inches annually. May be problems with torrential downpours. (L) Land Use: Primarily dry farming, more rolling land used for grazing. (5) Wind erosion the dominant type on nearly level dry lands. (6) Native vegetation consists mainly of blue grain with moderate amounts of buffalo grass. Any one factor making the area undesirable is reason for elimination, however most were eliminated by two or more factors. YELLOW AREA — not a specific geological formation, however, with the aid of maps supplied by Weld County Planning Office, this area vas eliminated for possible hazardous waste site. The criteria for elimination was the following: (1) Proximity to flood plains. (2) Proximity to aquifer recharge areas. -7 (3) Proximity to growth areas. /" (L) Land use, eliminating those areas of irrigated farmland. -' Through maps supplied by the State Geologists Office and descriptions from U. S. Geological urvey Water Supply Paper 1367, these areas were eliminated due to undesirable geologic conditions. KF (Black) - Fox Hills Sandstone - medium yellowish -brown calcareous 16 $ r'14g.''. marine sandstone interbedded with dark -grey to black sandy shale and some massive white sandstone. The sandstone is loosely to moderately cemented and contains concretions. The maximum thick- ness in this area is about 400 feet. Although the Fox Hills generally yields less than 15 gpm to wells and springs, yields as much as 350 gpm from wells have been reported. Except in the out- crop, the water is under artesian pressure. Q (RED) - Dune sand, valley £ill, and terrace deposits - Data from ground water, South Platte River Basin. The pediment deposits are of arkosic sand and gravel with minor amounts of red clay, with a yield of 2 to 5 gpm to wells. Although yield very small, sand and gravel have a high deCee of permeabilit , thus possible pollution of nearby water sources may result. The dune sand deposits and all alluvium are mainly comprised of sand, silts, gravel, and clay. These deposits yield moderate to large quantities of water to irrigation, municipal, industrial, domestic, and stock wells. For convenience, all quaternary deposits of unconsolidated material were mapped as one unit. KI (BLUE) - Laramie formation - Upper 400 feet consists of olive gray silty shale; contains lenticular beds of sandstone and numerous carbonaceous beds of clay and seams of lignite. Lower 200 feet con- sists of blue -gray silty shale, several relatively thin beds of sandstone and fairly thick beds of subbitnminous coal. At the base 17 is a thick persistent sandstone, immediately above are two thinner sandstone beds that locally coalesce with the thick sandstone. Some of the upper beds of sandstone and the basal beds of sandstone yield small to moderate supplies of water to industrial, public - supply, domestic, and stock wells. For this reason, this area would be undesirable. TA (ORANGE)-- The Arikaree Formation consists of gray to brown fine to medium sandstone that contains hard calcareous lenses and pipings. The sandstone is massive to poorly bedded and loosely to moderately cemented. It probably does not exceed 80 feet in thickness. The Arikaree yields small amounts of water to wells in adjacent areas. TO (PURPLE)- The Ogallala formation consists of beds and lenses of stream deposited gravel, silt, sand, and clay, and contains caliche. The material is loose to well cemented with calcium carbonate; the well cemented beds are termed "mortar beds" from their resemblance to concrete. Because the Ogallala was deposited on an eroded surface, it differs widely in thickness from place to place. The Ogallala yields small to moderate quantities of hard water to domestic and stock wells and springs and as much as 50 gpm to wells supplying the town of Peetz. TW (GREEN) The White River group consists predominantly of blocky variegated clay and siltstoae, which contain beds of loose to moderately cemented'flne to coarse sand. In places, the formation 18 atOgi contains hard siliceous channel sandstone and conglomerate. joints and fissures may penetrate the beds locally, increasing the water bearing capacity. "Porous zones" in the upper part of the White River that extend under saturated unconsolidated deposits may greatly increase the water -bearing capacity of the beds. The White River differs widely from place to place. The White River Group generally yields as much as 30 gpm to stock and domestic wells and springs. In places where it is either extremely sandy or highly fractured, it yields as much as 1,400 gpm to irrigation wells. Acceptable formation: KP (BROWN) - Pierre shale consists of bluish - black marine shale and silt sand and sandy shale in the beds of bentonite and large and interbedded tan to yellowish -brown upper part or transition zone. Many blush -gray limestone concretions are present throughout the formation. The thickness of the Pierre shale ranges from an estimated 6,500 feet near Hardin, Colorado to 2,500 feet near Paxton, Nebraska. Pierre shale is usually considered to be a poor source of water. In some areas, however, artesian water may be obtained from lenses of sand within the shale. Recharge by infiltration of surface water is negligible, because pore spaces between the grains of clay, silt, and very fine sand in the Pierre shale are very minute. Water in quantities sufficient for irrigation, public supply, or industrial use is not available from the Pierre shale. Except for the localized sand lenses and the deep -lying Rygtene.. 19 sandstone member, the Pierre shale is relatively impermeable and little or no water can be obtained from it. Many stock wells are drilled into the Pierre shale where it is overlain by permeable dune sand. For this reason, it would be desirable to avoid areas of thick dune sand. Supplemental information: Reports on proposed waste disposal site near Limon, Colorado - Prepared for Chem -Nuclear Services, Inc. Prosser, Washington by Charles S. Robinson, Ph. D., Consulting Geologist and Engineer, Denver, Colorado, October 1969. Conclusions and recommendations summarized from this report: (1) A complete detailed engineering and geological study must be undertaken, to include a careful examination of geology and ground water conditions at the proposed site. (2) Proof must be supplied that the underground waters will not be polluted or contaminated. (3) Excavation and recompaction of the shale will form an almost completely impermeable barrier or seal around the disposal trenches. Engineering tests show a rate of water movement in recompacted Pierre shale to be only .2 feet per year. (k) Below a weathered zone of shale, the Pierre bedrock becomes quite impervious to the movement of water. Near Limon the shale extended to a depth of 3,000 feet. (5) Normal underground aquifers or water -bearing zones are not normally present in this shale formation. 20 *G"', Q�,� (6) Analytic tests submitted by Mr. C. S. Robinson indicate a favorable ion exchange ratio by the weathered shale. This feature is a tremendous safety factor for waste disposal facilities. (7) Must insure minimum runoff enters the site. (8) The weathered shale has some permeability. (9) Should have test wells to monitor any movement of leachate from the site. (10) Samples of water, soil, and plants should be collected prior to disposing of wastes to furnish background data prior to operation. (11) Recommend determing the prevaling wind direction and average wind speed over the past year as background information. TABLE 1. —Centralized section of 1hq geologic units System Series Qusterwy Recent and Plesstoceoe Omloeie watt Thickness (lest) Physicalchuscter , Water -hearing properties Onmmnll• dated deposits Dune sand 0-50.6 Very One to medium sand and el::. Not known to yield Nut to nue. Serves elan to nitration area let means. Yield adequate quantal. of water to stork an'1 domestic wells la snow. Of the ern In Oloae yield as much as ps00 grim m lmlt,tbd rein. Yield as much as 1,2m Lpw to IrrIP[bn vacs. Yalley.fdl deposit 0 -,Gilt Teresa > > deposits Pliocene Otouala FOP::stia° Gravel, sand, sot, sod day: mod and toter - •bedded. 0-120t Gravel, end, silt. and clay: aced end later. bedded. ldeollOed only in a small woes oar li_rebrd. Ccr. tl hilt, sand, towell cemswed"In Wass ins some 0.1&Tt Duane; lee poorly OW a mane mnzbmeate at the oase. Fine- en mediuhairla oed. loose to moderately cemented sandstooc: contains hard calcareous ,cares Sad pawns. Tertterc I Miocene drlkarea Formation Yields small to moderate quantities of water to domestic and stack well. and sprints May yield small gaolitta of water to stock and W.bRUO WILLS. Miocene White Rim Group Blocky variegated flay and alttslone: contains 01AOt Iwse to moderately cemented toad. In pieces enatauu bard channel sandstone. Cfrtstw';J - tipper : Cretaceous Lammle Formation Ellie CO sande, yello .Drown and err: CO oliwo 0.1adt Mg carbonaceous stale; tWnolte stained; lowebedded wan stole sandstone: contains ' lignite. and mak Fine. to mediumaraVrtd, yelbw.Mwwn sand•' atone. eontame Been of dare -gray to black sandy shale and wn:te crapes sandman. Dark•Laay to beet eha!er in plated has weather. ed tone of elluw.Orowa clay at top: moums iem-r end beds of ye:bw•brown ctsiay sand. MOS. Shale, limestone, and em'nwne. Fox ,lilts sandstone 0-4401 Pierre Shale 0-7,000t Yields edentate quantities of water to stock and domestle welts and sprint, to roan of ::Y YCJ. In Mates yields:s which OS IMOtpm (repurtedi to Irrigation tads. Yields small to moderate maiming, of wear to stock and domestic weW and syrmn. Do. MIesomle and Paleozoic rocks, 2,0Wt adlderenuated 21 Do. Some units yield small gaotans of \nate to dmmntse and stock welt, and sprung in toe extreme western part of the limo. e types of vegetation that could be or:own in these areas would be dependent on the degree of the salinity, but even without any salinity problems, many types of vegetation could not grow In these areas 4, Unstable soil structure, which often limits the use of land, could exist 5. ronstructlon of structural or budding foundations could be hampered by -the flow of ground water into the construction excavations. 6. Basements could be subject to collapse from water pressure and flooding. The situations described in items 4, 5, and 6 also could occur in areas where the depth to the water table is not more than 10 feet either seasonally or annually. B. Depth to the water table related to depth of Installation: 1. Liquid wastes or leachates from solid waste could be introduced directly into the ground -water system by water moving through landfills and related types of facilities, resulting in degradation or pollution of the ground water. The possibility of degradation or pollution would be dependent on the type and amount of waste, the depth of burial of the waste, and the seasonal or annual depth of the water table in the area of the landfill or related type of facility. 2. Ground water could enter leaky sanitary sewers, resulting in a significant increase in the volume of waste to be processed by waste -treatment facilities The volume of water entering a leaky sanitary sewer would be dependent on the depth of burial of sewer and the seasonal or annual depth to the water table. 3. The placement of electric and telephone utility lines below ground and the type of insulation and conduits required for below -ground installation would be, in part, dependent on the depth to the water table. DEPTH TO THE WATER TABLE Measured depths to the water table during 1976-77 in the unconsolidated alluvial deposits ranged from 0 to 45.6 feet Generally the depth to the water table in the flood plains of present streams was less than 10 feet and, in many localities, it was less than 5 feet. The depth to the water table in ancestral stream valleys, such as Beebe Draw, and in the terraces ranged from 0.5 to 45.6 feet. Water levels in wells completed in windblown deposits, consolidated sedimentary rocks, and fractured crystalline rocks were measured only in Boulder County. In the county, the depth to the water table in the windblown deposits ranged from 3 to 12 feet in the consolidated sedimentary rocks, it ranged from 1 to 29 feet; and in the fractured crystalline rocks, it ranged from 9 to 193 feet. SELECTED REFERENCES Colton, R a, 1978, Geologic map of the Boulder —Fort C area, Culorada U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Inc. I -855—G. Jenkins, a D., 1961, Records and logs of selected wells anc chemical and radiometric analyses of groundwater in the Colorado: Colorado Water Conservation Board Basic -Data Major, T. J., Kerbs, Lynda, and Penley, R D., 1975, Selet records for Colorado, 1971-75: Colorado Water Cons Basic -Data Release 37, 356 p. Schneider, P. A, Jr., 1962, Records and logs of selected weE and chemical analyses of ground water in the South Platt, western Adams and southwestern Weld Counties, Colo Water Conservation Board Basic -Data Report 9, 84 p. Schneider, P. A, Jr., and Hershey, L A, 1961, Records and wells and test holes, and chemical analyses of ground wa Cache la Poudre River basin, Colorado Colorado Wate Board Bastc-Data Report 8, 60 p. Schneider, P. A, Jr., and Hillier, D. E, 1978, Hydrologic date aquifers in the Boulder —Fort Collins —Greeley area. Fror Corridor, Colorado: U.S. Geological Survey Open -Fie F 55 p. METRIC CONVERSIONS MULTIPLY BY Foot Mile Acre 0.3048 1.609 0.4047 T( 1 For sale Dr Branch of Oiseaatgn. US Gra. Box 2515$. feonnn Carnet. Demo/, CO 8022 4316, - .5 1 ��J')� 12.1 �9‘2 j r- -_—.7-11-"\\. �P� 6— �.., �O.n O 02 O 20.1/ f/ 1. 107-27.7 i J`. 282 j____ II .n 'ny.� 1. 7.01 `—r_.'1 ') 2Efr4 �l� �� iJ• ��1 �0 Op 'rIA 7.8 -� ic ' \ iry _ \-; ii2 ®22.0 28.7 0 357' ��.•. Iek- — --�� ..,.,., '^-------,�a10 I •,0.5 /r szc_W 0 Winds 11.7 Johnstown n m 47 .18Q�w� / p 1023. ` ✓ .. f�93*p O O da Q!9 O en 1 23.0_ _ /� • I 121.90 286, o Y, I/ atier J.� O 8 dobe- b 7. O ; I .._j� �F � 1• X7 ••_..)_3270 �' P�J�6.3 i �/� 1(4)31.5 i / Y n• l3M 474.9 1 _� X6.3 / ,0 29.0 65 / "Wildcat �aa//Ilo 00 oicw q i � Molina ¢ b -i % )2631 .e- �/88�I ' �. 27.z/ ,o I I EPA: Notification of Hazardous Waste Site united States Environmental Protection Agency Washington DC 20460 his initial notification information is eauired by Section 103(c) of the Compre- ensive Environmental Response, Compen- anon. and Liability Act of 1980 and must e mailed by June 9, 1981. Please type or print in ink. It you need additional space. use separate sheets of paper. Indicate the letter of the stern which applies, CDs- ow- DDI-OD9 MAI 27 StE;0 'erson Required to Notify: rater the name and address of the person r organization required to notify. Name Balcom Chemicals, Inc - Sumo p.o. Box 1286 coy Greeley _ site Location: :rater the common name (if known) and Ly, ctgal location of the site. street 10 Sout`.i West of Greeley` city Greeley county Weld Burcheta, Dennis Name of site Wei County Dump )erson to Contact: l Lei` 097.. - Name 0.ar, First and hint inter the name, title (if applicable), and ,usiness telephone number of the person o contact regarding information submitted on this form. 111 °IIlill llIL1C 11 043386 Siam CO Zip Code 80631 Phone (303)356-4400 ,U37 77 AV state CO Zip Code 80631 Dates of Waste Handling: inter the years that you estimate waste Treatment, storage, or disposal began and ended at the site. From(Yeerl 1973 To bear) 1976 Waste Type: Choose the option you prefer to complete Option I: Select general waste types and source categories. If sou do not know the general waste types or sources, you are .ncouraged to describe the site in Item I —Description of Site. General Type of Waste: 'lace an X in the appropriate poxes. The categories listed overlap. Chock oach applicable category. 1. C Organics 2. C Inorganics 3. C Solvents 4, C Pesticides 5. 0 Heavy metals 6. C Acids 7. G Bases 8. C PCBs 9. C Mixed Municipal Waste 10. 0 Unknown 11, G Other (Specify) Form Approved O\1B Vo.f10p0-0l3ts CPA dorm R900 -t Source of Waste: Place an X in the appropriate boxes. 1 1. 0 Mining 2. C Construction 3. C Textiles 4. C Fertilizer 5. C Paper/Printing 6. 0 Leather Tanning 7. 0 Iron/Steel Foundry 8. C Chemical, General 9. C Plating/Polishing 10. 0 Military/Ammunition 11. G Electrical Conductors 12, 0 Transformers 13. C Utility Companies 14, C Sanitary/Refuse 15. C Photofinish 16. 0 Lab/Hospital 17. 0 Unknown 18. C Other (Specify) Option 2: This option is available to persons familiar with the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Section 3001 regulations (40 CFR Part 261). Specific Type of Waste: EPA has assigned a four -digit number to each hazardous waste listed in the regulations under Section 3001 of RCRA. Enter the appropriate four -digit number in the boxes provided. A copy of the list of hazardous wastes and codes can be obtained by contacting the EPA Region serving the State in which the site is located. r _ _ J Waste in this time frame consisted of dust from the formulation of disulfoton and Phorate (organic phosphate pesticides). In addition there was floor sweepings, empty containers and bags (EXHIBIT P .D.- 9S JUN 1.0 1981 Notification of Hazardous Waste Site Side Two Waste Quantity: Place an X in the appropriate box"- to indicate inc facility types found at t..e site. In the "total facility waste amount" space give the estimated combined quantity (volume) of hazardous wastes at the site using cubic feet or gallons.. In the "total facility area" space. give the estimated area size which the facilities occupy using square feet or acres. Facility Type 1, G Piles 2. C Land Treatment 3, S Landfill 6, G Tanks 5. O Impoundment 6. Underground Injection 7.O Drums, Above Ground 8. O Drums. Below Ground 9 O Other :Specify' Total Facility Waste Amount cubic fee, aaasil+e.._. 10,000 gau..ns Total Facility Area square feet A.:res 100 Acfre7, lcnroX. Known, Suspected or Likely Releases to the Environmen.: Place an X in the appropriate boxes to indicate any known, suspected, or likely releases of wastes to the environment. ❑ Known C Suspected C Likely a None Note: Items 'W and I are optional. Completing these items will assist EPA and State and local governments in locating and assessing hazardous w."cte sites. Althougn completing the items is not required, you are encouraged to do so. Sketch Map of Site Location: (Optional) Sketch a map showing streets. hip;•nays. routes or other prominent landmar.:.; near the site, Place an X on the map to indicate the site location. Draw an arrow showing the direction north, You may substitute a publish no map showing the site location. N APPrc s I n\t. tr. .3 rv\ ll go? r0 Se. %} A\t Description of Site: (Optional) Describe the history and present conditions of the site. Give directions to the site and describe any nearby wells, springs, lakes, or housing. Include such information as how waste was disposed and where the waste Came from. Provide any Other information or comments which may help describe the site conditions. Signature and Title: The person or authorized representative Name (such as plant managers, superintendents, tru≤tets or attorneys) of persons required to notify must sign the form and provide a mailing address (if different than address in item A). Fo' other persons providing notification, the signature is optional. Chec•. the boxes which best describe the relationship to the s to of the person required to notify. If you are not required -•.r. Street C.n iralccsn Chem.^als l),9 1o«b St Greeley S.enature ' .c.. IC 1 ! '. Stale �O Z,nCode 2,0651 once 5-20-81 • Owner, Present • Owner. Pas: ^ Transporter • Operator, Present Operator, Fast • Other • ,ITC .A... a'�t}'r'�a� aHAZARDOUS WASTE SITE LOG Niti • - POTENTIAL NUMDEH ! to 0060000 � NOTE: The initial idendficetioe of * potential site or incident should not be interpreted as a fihda it of ire& activity or confirm- •lioo LSe_ e_ actual he.l•,`r or envGeenental •_`.rest exists. All identified sites will be an d under the EPA's Hasardoue Waste Site Eaforcemeat sod Response System to determine if a hazardous waste problem actually exists. $.IE MANE Weld County Landfill (-recini nilfltRen Ltand+,ll 6037 77ChC - r wrt Ll,v is -Greeley I CO L./DL y0 G 31 sUNN•aY OF Ao„4EN-IA4 OR KNO oN JRO dLEM I11e1'1IIIIII��Igl��ll��l� Waste 'disposal site survey, (Eckhardt list) I h^ 043380 ; �IIIUI'1 ITEM ++II 0A -E OF Dn ON 0 N• COMPtOR (COMPEL• TIOM RESPO N SI RLEiVrOUA ORGANIZATION OR IN CannOUAL W.A. State, Can,r•sroanO rho} p RSON MAKINC E CNTRY TO LOG FORM OwTE ENTCREO ON LOO m.,<. r n) I. /CCNTPICwT10N OF POT ENYtAI PRO BL EN' 11_31-7/ • Ton, C- Sm.4h7 pp �T -Y is erciore_ 1l -2Y-•7? I'�- 7�i(7 Try ��(ll";,rtly J1.L1i / .1 I/Gt'/lu ce Uz7J-71 L Pa�LININAgY ASSESS�EMT— —~ —•'f u MIOH APPARENT SER/OUSN CSS OP PRO BL [MI y,�LL_T- I7 MEDIUM 1u LOW in NONE � o UNKNOWN JI1 I 1 7, SITE INSPECTION. 6 EPA (check I. TENTATIVE DISPOSITION ..p.tpd..• It•N(e) blow) a, NO ACTON *CEDED h, INVESTIGA TVC ACTION N[!"D EO -3/4-"' L (••. 1''e aka..•. +ti r,•�:.,r. _ _ .,_r__:_.,=_,_,.7.:7_7_... 7 .. ;e`, — __ �~ Vic. - _ •� __' :: — I] e, REMEDIAL ACTION NEEDED +ram,Vl — —. -- _— �� — -v .— — 'MR.l.aa.3'1� O . ENPORCCMENY ACTION NECOED •/. : 4,r ). CPA PIN AL STAA TEOY DET ENYINAYIOM• 5--...-.-2-... (cheek apProp l./�uem0,1 below) —m.i ., NO ACTION NEEDED' o b. RCMEOIAL ACTION NCEOCO r'I PEME DIAL ACTION NEEDED ROT. LJ a' MO RESOUPCCS AVAILABLE e. EM PORCEMCHT ACTION NECDCD CD (11 CASE DCVCLOPWCNT PLAN PREPARED ENMO ISTMATT CARE Ell EP OR t$I AOMI NIRT RA TIVE ORDER ISSUED � ' r:�y`y'.j'r • a—..A4CI G ,kky� yrk� YL'G -_• • •f'_ - --ter. _ -'— �n • _..Tom, ) �s ,^•�� <O.: �••��..v --': ft•'; .,:,:tti •vim.. _ � �. • .. •.•� _ - _� 1+ - -` _ ,,. .--. — C. STMTCCY CONPLETEO EPA retell T2070 -I (1 WI) • e .,,14e n e a IV. CHARACTERIZATION OF SITE ACTIVITY :n;Gcate, the major site activity(lea) and details relating; to each awity by marking 'X' in the appropl.te boxes D. DISPOSER B. STO4ER C. TREATER A. TRANSPORTER L .. Snto 13. 0ARGE 5. Ie. OTHER (Hpeeilt.): Jo. OTHER (epfl(y) PC(. NC I1 PILE 11. PILT �TIOw VOUw 3 Y •^J INCINERATION a. LAHo I2. SUNFA CE IMNOA+E (I. L• O LL I3. O IA. T• uMS K. ABOVE GROUND TA B LO G OVNO 3 VOLUME PEOUCT AR ON j3. OPE•• DUMP A. RECYCLING/RECOVERY r L. S ileACE IMHOUNDMENT S. CNE4.2 PwV 5. TREATMENT (]. MIDNIGHT CHAMPING le, IR BIOLOGICAL TP[ATuE.T IS. IN NEA TIO . N " WASTE OIL nERROC VNOE BCMO VN?w2EC INJECTION IS. SOLVENT RECOVERY R. OTHER (495(1(y)' 0. O THEN (.peCAY)- E. SPEC IFY DETAILS OF SITE ACTIVITIES AS NEEDED ^ V..." in° 14 CC,'"" *-. Yy pvs i-I-cr t4 164,8,6.1c - NpSoa- 1 QC0, A. WASTE TYP �1 UNKNOWN X2 LIQUID B. WASTE CHARACTERISTICS X1. UNKNOWN C2. CORROSIVE CM. IGNITABLE r-15. TOXIC C7 REACTIVE Oa. INERT V. WASTE RELATED INFORMATION .1. SOLID A. SLUDGE fS. GAS ❑9 RADIOACTIVE FLAMMABLE HIGHLY VOLATILE 710. OTHER (specify): C. WASTE CATEGORIES t, Are records of waste. sveileblep Specify items such us msnlfeats, inventories, etc. below. Z4�( te/r- pr -R /t - wArc pl.e4 . ure)of waste by category; mark 'X' to indite 2. Estimate the LUDGE AMOUNT amount (specify unit of mea AMOUNT OIL . SOLVENTS e hick wastes are present. d. CHEMICALS e. SOLIDS AMOUN AMOUNT (4/4L UNIT or MEASURE ”PAIN T. PIGMENTS (a1METALS SLUDGES 31 POTW (AI ALUMINUM SLUDGE (5I OTHER(epectly): UNIT OF MEASURE X' ill OILY WASTES l2iOTH ER (specify) UNIT OF MEASURE X UNIT IIINALOGENATED SOLVENTS I21 N ON•H A LOGNT IS, SOLVENTS AMOUNT Oe MEASURE UNIT OF MEASURE 111 ACIDS-IIrt/ASN 121 PICK LING LIQUORS (21 ASBESTOS OTIS AMOUNT zAAl k. R V IT OP MEASUP 1111 LABORATORY p APMACEVT. HOSPITAL Jill OTHER(epe City) 131 CAUSTICS (31MIL LING/ INE TAILINGS R AOIO ACTIVE (III PESTICIDES FERROUS i e1SMLT C. WAST S •I MUNICIPAL ISI DYES/INKS NON•. ER RODS SI STILT G. WASTES (SICY ANIOE IllPHENOL5 ISI HALOGENS (91 PCB 1101 MET AL 1111 OTNER(Ipec,iy) 0T HER/ID.c ly) 51O kept (vp.C fly): EPA arm T20704 11D• 9) PAGE 2 OF a Continue On Page 3 ••3116 ' V. WASTE RELATED INFORMATION (continued) ON THE SITE In d.ac•ndrn• (rd.. of ',mid). 3. LIST SL.STANCES OF GREATEST CONCERN WHICH MAY BE (Pin. A. ACDITIONAL COMMENTS OR NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION or SITUAL',ON KNOWN OR REPORTED TO EXIST AT THE SITE. II NO (LAS L7w N Cur" p ( /k, rl (-1 an. 141A -Z. A -ft. QC,* C r LA -w, I' I N VI, HAZARD DESCRIPTION I A. TYPE OE HAZARD B. POTEN• TIAL HAZARD (mark 'X') C. ALLEGED INCIDENT (m.rk'X') D. DATE OF INCIDENT (ma..d*y.yr.) I E.REMARKS 1. NO HAZARD T 2_ HUMAN HEALTH I NON•WORKER S. INJURY/EXPOSURE •. WORKER INJURY CONTAMINATION e' OK WATER SUPPLY CONTAMINATION OW WOOD CHAIN CONTAMINATION T' or GROUND WATER CONTAMINATION S' OP %VRFACE WATER DAMAGE TO S' PLORA/FAUNA 101 FUM KILL CONTAMINATION OP AIR 12. NOTICEABLE ODORS IJ, CONTAMINATION OF SOIL • I•. PROPERTY OAMAOE 1e. PIPE OR ICAPLOSION SPILLS/LEAKING CONTAINERS/ 5•' RUNOFF/STANDING LIQUIDS SEWER. STORM IT. DRAIN PROBLEMS IS. EROSION PROBLEMS 1e. INADEOUATE SECURITY ;o. INCOMPATIBLE WASTES 01. MIONIGMT DUMPING a Z. 0 -HER (specify): _ _ . r....:.... n., A....nn EPA Peon T2070.2 O0.701 °' 7,1061 VII. PERMIT INFORMATION - A; INDICATE ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS HELD BY THE SITE. 7I I NPOES PERMIT 1 2 SPCC PLAN J 3. STATE PE RMIT(aPeadY)' I A AIR PERMITS S. LOCAL PERMIT 1-7 6. RENA TRANSPORTER 17 RCRA STORER `1 5 ACRA TREATER Lj 9 RCRA DISPOSER --- - JI 10. OTHER lapeeify, _ _.. B. IN COMPLIANCE' 1 YES 2 NO 3 4 WITH RESPECT TO (11•r repul.00n Remit 6 numb") UNKNOWN bill. PAST REGULATORY ACTIONS .- A,1 A, NONE = B. YES (summarise below) IX, INSPECTION ACTIVITY ()Isaf Or on-poin 1 u A. NONE ik B. YES (complete Sterne 1,2,7, & 4 below) I TYPE OF ACT'V'TY 2 DATE OF PAST ACTION (mo.. day, 6 yr.) 3 PERFORMED BY: (EPA/ Stele) •.DESCRIPTION flour I;AJ5'p (r8-'78 S-r-Arrira.. Aso 4'4pA� coAc-rcc ,,,.r&o. X. REMEDIAL ACTIVITY (Past or on -going) A. NONE n 0. YES (complete Items 1,2,2. (1. 4 below) - 1. TYPE OF ACTIVITY 2.DATEOF PAST ACTION (mo., day, 6 yr.) S.PERPORMED MV: (EPA/ra ) A,D[SCRIPTION NOTE: Based on the information information on the -first in Sections III through X, fill out the Preliminary Assessment (Section 11) page of this form. EPA Form T2070.2 (10.79) 04714 1 I I I I I 1 1 I ASHTON-DANIELS NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION PACKET WITH EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT OF ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CENTRAL WELD LANDFILL CERTIFICATE OF DESIGNATION SHOULD NOT BE REVOKED APRIL 5, 1993 WELD COUNTY COMMISIONERS' PUBLIC HEARING WELD COUNTY CENTENNIAL BUILDING GREELEY, COLORADO EXHIBIT I A.D.- Lie I 5:34 ogi I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. US GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHART (1969) 2. ASCS AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH OF LANDFILL (JULY 1992) 3. WELD COUNTY AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH (1971) 4. GREELFY TRIBUNE ARTICLE (OCTOBER 24, 1985) 5. AERIAL PHOTO 6. AERIAL PHOTO 7. AERIAL PHOTO 8. AERIAL PHOTO 9. WETLANDS PHOTO 10. MESA PHOTO 11. SPOMER LAKE PHOTO 12. WHITE MILKY DISCHARGE FROM BELOW SPOMER LAKES 13. DEEP TRENCHES AND LANDSLIDES PHOTOGRAPHS 14. BLOWING DUST PHOTOGRAPH 15. BLOWING TRASH PHOTOGRAPH 16. BLOWING TRASH PHOTOGRAPH 17. NUISANCE PHOTOGRAPHS 18. ASBESTOS PHOTOGRAPH 19. DEAD SHEEP CARCASSES 20. SEEP PROBLEMS FROM ILLEGAL POND 1 1 _ 1 I 1 1 1 1 H Fr. W 5 0 rTr — + CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929 I6 ,,, \> . `b n Weft - •�1 r v r 1 N. I 1 1 1 5064 V NE (ORACEWELLI 000 I AILOMETRE TI7 eor /1 cxf *441,06 • f4835 47'30' OATEZ 'Cr h.] M' A 12200000 r[[T .519 h0/ 23 .l>6 wH II vu r /1 5 ° 100 0 0. a V n 1 V$ R_._,--_ ,• y� .69Jr 7/ , _.. . a. - --"-- \ 32 • JNIO. Q1,% I / a USGS CHART DATED 1969 SHOWING ORIGINAL TOPOGRAPHICAL ELEVATIONS. CURRENT DUMP IS HIGHLIGHTED IN YELLOW. PAGE1 THIS MAP COMPLIES W TN NATIONAL MAP ACCURACY STANDARDS 4742 FOR SAI E BY U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, DENVER, COLORADO 80225, OR RESTON, VIRGINIA 22092 L #n • rr }. w,. 1985 C•6 GREELEY (Coto.) TRIBUNE ew. PS" byh,� USIA* I1illiken firefighters stand in a cloud of smoke to spray water on a dump ire SQL.lire southWest.ot Crosby Wednesday. ,' ‘ indbllo n firs destroys -:J. ores A windblown -dump fire Wednesday' af, ii +ernoon destroyed about 10 acre. of eom ours before bulldozers were called in. to put it out. r ,-:` The fire started`at approxnnately ^ 15` m. at. the Central Weld Landfill, :6037 77th. ye., owned by Colorado Landfill Inc. The Milliken Fire Department responded v.Cjzef ' `' ell Tarrant called the Johnstown and, tow . estern Hills departments for help when Inds blew;;flamc from.the;burning trash I into an adjacert corn' field owned w -Sum "We .could .pour watcr•.;on <that. ..-Telep.. r;;. forever and not put if out,".Tarrant sad. "ft k. zijust,smolidersie.fracre,.wasn't.. any du:gcr . About 10 acre; of.thcvtandigq corn v:,2ed,,M ,ctin.;we o t ou,co the co .Lc d Sezwe ,', at'..v5,000; were 'dmtroyed...The e wa:"„h.,.dtogetthebulldozerstogetItout. contained to the trash dung bj ✓` h m „. ..,The fire could `,aye.Scen caused by'bot .T;rcGghters from 11t rihr+v,,;deP.L.Nn a. , a.y m.. a is ,load-, o —trash -ox ,.. n x1 of ' �4•donned oxygen, kn..zslt:.'add' viadi ?a,Lncr cheznica! ;�t at -caused spoataaeouz comb : blowing smoke•.to.ijipout. water: oatn"thb:' t?a.Tarrartaid; The dump hie. a:isor;.; • burning trash.; It..took• bizlldo'err.iroar`.:hetarfzrn., in the -10.11,i he-, aid,, and a.mect. ,, county and area contractor:- plow n they between the county and the fire C-zt tcts pilesunder to put th'ebtazc out; hot } �„ be .n irequ meted. ; NEWS CLIPPING FROM QItEELE'r T^.''?:Jci OCTO2.E: 24, 1985. ?AGE G`^R ,1^! 4, ° tlit.19't4';.f r t I I i i I I I I VIEW OF MILKY W-::717:1 FOUL-SMELL:NG D:SC::AaGE FROM 114 SPOMER LAKE. TAKEN BY S :ARDN OAV:S 25 OCTOBER :992, LATE AFTERNOON. MERE WAS NO SNOW OR :CE ON THAT DATE. PAGE :2 § i 27 MARCH 3.4 C• ?di lern MN a a OM el a I MS IS =II at r•iw • iA • • I• t• :i4 •,a c', ••Mr . •• 1 • 4..: 1. • .•I' . f..+.r+INIM— - -•— •-- w ••ww.•:rs._•• •••••,.... — .... —•w..— `z w I4 0 < i•• O celLU I. .$ Z X t.4 .1 u] a x m 4 wev�sT .•1 X rn >. I o Lz 5 0 V W W ? C7xw�] Z. C4 I"" a. V 0O.J i 0 0 I... J a . W e 0 w x_5.�.,uaf�* aiM0�aa 0 u, . X r'--_-•awisnn4rx:•- rx 2,,pa tij0O r, �0 N: 4. •C t r �/_ I. IY . f L41 W M X .. Q w r ria07. ,. ` — WEW FRO a: fall 11111 MI me nostie IND ell WM OM afi ME{ w 4, v C? or, i:t, w .r 0 Q c 11. . •C '" 0 Li O o; `7u. ir w 0 a'Li O 0 O LO yr ra: X w 1,41 . '4 A. c, a u1 a o o rx a. - •..0 V. !' •� O 0 UN) • 44 yam u Ud x L a. e14 W C'"'9 " • !_. 11 -40 052 s1 -x� ... w yr: .v.•.t..• .. ...rfv". ••till^. -Avaimemosammisr,r 4144 •- '• ._..,..,,_-....1..1... • • • • • -• • :ew '.- ,..6, O Da o zQ t.. a • 0 1•: Z. U •.)d a. W 0 h 4 4 4 < .Mr Ill IA .° 0"" 0 U -. 0 c4 w ! < 17 w III r:4a — ca H+ Q. H 4 ti. LC4 CI .= ! y LtsQ VI T cc a • a ..l z c4 0 2 U u, 0 4 4 .,w LU ,I n t—Q1'=� may.., C4 -JoxM a01 -r W'l. j IIIB nil O IWO WS Malt --.14a Ma e 11 Ce 74,- 0 4., ,x L� •-•• 0 4O uJ • 0) —O °r In tj 0 a• LO Q 0 ry :14cc U. w00,-! ^w 0 'X s.. r g 0, :.s 0 0 t:6 MARCH •••1r ^,%i^ • y• ' THESE VIEWS ARE FROM T2hE N.':.. SIDE O'. THE DUMP LCO:CNG TOWARD 71-H-7 SOt:I-;WEST AND T(E NOR": -.WEST- - NOTE THE. REMAINS AND THE AMOUNT O? SLOWING TRASH - (^_0 MARCH 199^_. 9:OOAM) ?.4G: ;s z 7 r_• e. w n e r� x,6 Ci 7-7 O r, x Z 72:1 — CU • 4 s� O O vi M L 6,2 WI RH PORI F. FROM "1h nrM C ® -6 ® MO a MM®® MB '® ME OM MO MM MM THIS VIEW IS OF THE WORKING FACE DURING THE SPRING O7 992. IT WAS TAXEN AT 1:00 PM. • NOTE T:.E AS RESTOS WITH THE WARNING LAS: LS STILL INTACT. PAGE w, \ z O t— \ 1-3 ( \ \ ca 6G \\ >\ \z • 2 ai /Cj /\ .31 (& \z z titt / O uj cie 111 a a a a n O a a a r>3745.aas all M ZIC MU = CO i; tm !� r r' COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH lgy6 Richard D. Lamm Governor Waste Services, Inc. 6037 77th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80634 April 1, 1986 Attention: Lynn Keirnes, President Dear Mr. Keirnes: Thomas M. Vernon. M.D. Executive Director The Colorado Department of Health has reviewed your request to change the name of the Certificate of Designation for the Greeley, Milliken Sanitary Landfill from Colorado Landfill, Inc. to Waste Services, Inc. The Department approves your request provided, (1) you receive approval from the Weld County Commissioners, (2) you commit to operating the landfill in accordance with the approved operational plan, engineering design and the Certificate of Designation If you have any questions please contact me at (303) 320-8333 ext. 4364. Sincerely, an/Maeff/1741/11- Dennis C. Hotovec Geologist Solid Waste/Superfund Waste Management Division DCH:pb cc: Weld County Commissioners Weld County Health Dept. 42.10 EAST 11TH AVENUE DENVER. COLORADO 80220 PHONE (303) 320.8333 INC. 6037 77th Avenue Greeley. Colorado 80634 (303) 330-2641 April 3, 1986 Weld County Board of Commissioners 915 Tenth Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Re: Certificate of Designation Greeley -Milliken Landfill in the SW1/4, Sec.32, T5N, R66W of the 6th P.M. Weld County, Colorado Dear Commissioners: Waste Services, Inc., requests transfer of ownership of Certificate of Designation No. 21 (Greeley -Milliken site) from Colorado Landfill, Inc., to Waste Services, Inc. My wife, Lela and I each own 50% of the stock of Waste Services, Inc. I will be directly responsible for the management of the Greeley -Milliken site. Waste Services, Inc., plans to follow the existing operations plan for the Greeley -Milliken site. Because of the previous successful ownership and management of Colorado Landfill by my wife and me, we feel very qualified in financial and management responsibilities to operate this site and to meet the requirements of Federal, State and County health regulations. Weld County transferred the Industrial Revenue Bonds from Colorado Landfill, Inc., to Waste Services, Inc., in December of 1985. This re- flects the confidence of Weld County Board of Commissioners in our capability to manage and operate the landfill site. I would appreciate your early consideration of this request. If I can provide additional information to expidite this matter, please call me. Respectfully, WASTE SERVICES, INC. G, %&,iue, C. Lynn Keirnes, President CLK/qc RESOLUTION RE: APPROVE TRANSFER OF OPERATOR OF SOLID WASTE SITE CERTIFICATE OF DESIGNATION FOR GREELEY-MILLIKEN LANDFILL SITE FROM COLORADO LANDFILL, INC. TO WASTE SERVICES, INC. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, Colorado Landfill, Inc. is the current holder of a Certificate of Designation which was issued by the Board of County Commissioners, and WHEREAS, Colorado Landfill, Inc. desires to transfer the operator ownership to Waste Services, Inc. for the Greeley -Milliken Landfill site, and WHEREAS, on the 7th day of May, 1986, a public hearing was held in the Chambers of the Board for the purpose of considering the request for transfer of the Solid Waste Site Certificate of Designation, for the Greeley -Milliken landfill site, from Colorado Landfill, Inc. to Waste Services, Inc., and WHEREAS, said solid waste disposal site is located in part of the SW1, Section 32, Township S North, Range 66 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the State Department of Health, Solid Waste Division, has approved the Transfer of Operator to Waste Services, Inc., and WHEREAS, it appears from testimony before the Board that new operator will have the ability to meet the requirements of Certificate of Designation and the Solid Waste Disposal Sites Facilities Act and the regulations promulgated thereunder, WHEREAS, pursuant hearing the testimony, of the Certificate of operator of said solid the the and and to Section 30-20-104, CRS, the Board, after deems it advisable to approve said transfer Designation to Waste Services, Inc. as the waste disposal site. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the request for transfer of operator for the Certificate of Designation of a Solid Waste Site for the Greeley -Milliken Landfill Site from -Colorado Landfill, Inc. to Waste Services, Inc. be, and hereby is, approved. ft / f, I; R60457 • Page 2 RE: TRANSFER CERTIFICATE OF DESIGNATION - WASTE SERVICES The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 7th day of May, A.D., 1986. ATTEST :ATTEST driaput adw%7Lw t4:, Weld County(Clerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board Deputy County C1 rk APPROVED AS TO FORM: d County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Sal -0g". 860457 l.ioL RADO DEPARTMENT OFAHEALTH ROY ROME Governor PATRICIA A. NOLAN, MD, MPH Executive Director Hazardous Materials and Waste Management Dlvlsbn 4210 East 11th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80220-3716 (303) 3314830 / FAX (303) 331-4601 September 18, 1992 Kent E. Hanson Attorney at Law Clayton Center 1881 9th Street, Suite 216 Boulder, Colorado 80802 RE: Central Weld County Landfill Weld County Ydejt Nerkn: Main Building, Denver (303) 322.9076 Ptarmigan Mice, Denver (503) 320-1529 Pin! National Bank Building, Denver (303) 3554559 Grand lunetb„ Office (303) 248-7198 r,.eMo otfiee (719) 543.941 RECEIVED OCT 5 1992 KEN I L nouvwxy Dear Mr. Hanson: The Hazardous Materials and Waste Management Division (the Division) of the Colorado Department of Health has received and reviewed your September 11, 1992 letter regarding the Central Weld County Landfill. The following is the Division' s response to the issues set forth in your letter. 1. Weld County is has no obligation under the Solid Waste Disposal Sites and Facilities Act (the Statute) to hold a public hearing for substantial changes in operations, though Weld County may if they so choose. A Certificate of Designation is issued for a specific solid waste land use (i.e. incinerator, sanitary landfill, or impoundment), and in this case the land use is a landfill. As long as the facility is a landfill and continues to operate as such, no public hearing is required. To date, the Division has no evidence to suggest that any other solid waste operation, beside landfilling, is occurring at the site. This same issue was the subject of a law suit between FSLIC vs the City and County of Denver, the Board of County Commissioners of Arapahoe County, Waste Management of Colorado and the Colorado Department of Health (1989). if you are interested in reviewing this document, please contact the Division to make an appointment for file access. The Division does, however, concur that any redesign or planned construction which would significantly change the planned design performance of a facility is subject to Division technical review. Following a recommendation for JCL c \0/ Kent Hanson, Attorney at Law Central Weld County Landfill September 18, 1992 Page 2 of 3 approval of the plan, the application shall be amended. The regulation does not state that the Certificate of Designation shall be amended. The County must utilize its own discretion or regulation as to whether an amended Certificate of Designation is required for facilities which amend their application, but continue to perform the same type of solid waste disposal. 2. The Central Weld County Landfill received a Certificate of Designation on October 6, 1971. At that time, the state had not promulgated solid waste regulations pursuant to the Statute. Between 1968 (the date the Statute became effective) and 1972, solid waste disposal sites and facilities complied with the minimum standards set forth in the Statute. The minimum standards detailed operational standards, but did not specifically require a design and operations plan. In 1972 regulations were promulgated pursuant to the Statute. That 1972 regulation set forth the requirement that all landfills with an existing Certificate of Designation were ' grandfathered,' that is they were required to meet the minimum standards of section 3, but not the standards of section 4 (which applied to all solid waste disposal sites and facilities that were designated after the effective date of the regulation). In 1983, when the regulations were revised to their current form. The Division concurs, and certainly Subtitle D will require, that the Central Weld County Landfill must develop an enhanced design and operations plan to bring the facility up to current standards. To the Division's knowledge, no design or operations plan has ever been developed for the landfill, nor are any plans of this nature contained in the Division files. 3. It is true, that ground water contamination has been identified off -site. The County has wisely chosen to allow the facility to take over the ground water monitoring activities at the landfill. The Central Weld County Landfill has expanded the list of ground water analytes, and through this effort has revealed the presence of volatile organics in the ground water. Golder Associates has recently submitted a hyrogeologie and geotechnical characterization report detailing and summarizing recent investigations. The Division is in the process of reviewing the report, and will work with Weld County and Waste Services Corporation to obtain a satisfactory resolution to the ground water contamination issue. 4. Waste Services Corporation does intend to submit (and is currently in process • S r1 Kent Manson, Attorney at Law Central Weld County Landfill September 18, 1992 Page 3of3 of developing) a comprehensive site development plan, and a design and operations plans. The Division has not been informed of any pending change in operations at the Central Weld County Landfill during this interim period. 5. The Division is not aware of any existing requirement or agreement that the final elevation of the landfill may not exceed the adjacent land surface. Hopefully, this letter responds to your issues. The Division is interested in pursuing, and will pursue the ground water contamination identified at the site, and in bringing the facility up to the State's standards. Thank -you for your letter and for the extension you were able to grant, so that an adequate response could be prepared. may be contacted at this office if you have any additional questions or concerns. I Si f 2ercly Austin N. Buckingham Geologist Hazardous Materials and Waste Management Division cc: B. Hedberg, Central Weld County Landfill B. Keirnes, Waste Services Corporation G. Kennedy, Weld County Commissioners L Morrison, Weld County Attorney D. O' Sadnick, Golder Associates J. Pickle, Weld County Health Department A. Scheere, Waste Management of North America K. Schuett, Weld County Department of Planning file: SW/WLD/CENTRAL • V��L k C,� i CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL OVERVIEW OF EVIDENCE IN RESPONSE TO PROBABLE CAUSE ALLEGATIONS April 5, 1993 • Presented to Board of County Commissioners Weld County, Colorado April 5, 1993 Waste Services Corporation is pleased -to proiride this;overview of testimony presented verbally at -the "Probable"'Caose"hearing in answer to the four alleged violations of &It ition nix er one,bf the Special Use Permit No. 116. Introduction: Waste Management Disposal Services of'Cblorado,'AKA; Waste Services Corporation is the owner and operator of the facility knownas-the "Central Weld Sanitary Landfill" located between Greeley and Milliken, Weld County, Colorado.` The Facility is operated .under'Certifficate`of Designation' No.<26 and Special Use Permit No. 116 originally' issuedin; 1971. It' is designed and operated to provide' thn. Central Weld Service Area with environmentally -sound, convenient and cost-effective disposal of non -hazardous solid wastes. • 931061 • • • Site History -- 1979 to Merger (1991) Role of Facility 1. Site has served as the central component of the Weld County solid waste management system by meeting ongoing needs of more than 85,000 Weld County residents and most of our largest businesses. * Feasibility Study conducted for Weld County in 1980 established service area concept for which site provides required capability for Central Service Area. (Please see Service Area Map) This concept has been incorporated into the current Weld County Comprehensive Plan which projects a useful capacity for this facility of 20 to 60 years. Site Environmental Considerations 1. Since 1979, numerous environmental investigations of the site have been conducted and various environmental upgrades have been made toward assuring ongoing compliance and environmental protection. * A 1980 Geotechnical Investigation (Empire Labs.) identified the need to install an underdrain beneath the western portion of the site to prevent impacts from artificial groundwater conditions caused by upgradient land uses. Study also established benefit of initiating the staged installation of a surface/groundwater diversion system to further protect site from unnatural groundwater conditions and surface water run-on caused by upgradient irrigation practices. A 1984 Hydrogeologic Assessment (Warzyn Engineering) affirmed benefit of continued staged installation of diversion system and established groundwater monitoring program. * Groundwater monitoring program initiated to monitor upgradient and downgradient groundwater for base parameters under contract by Weld County Department of Health. 9.106 t • • • Site Operational Considerations 1. Effort made to operate facility in compliance with applicable regulations and compatible with surrounding agricultural land uses. * * Record of compliance inspections conducted by Colorado and Weld County Departments of Health show consistent operational compliance history. Endeavored to be good neighbor to surrounding neighbors. Future Regulatory and Industry Considerations 1. A 1991 Subtitle D Preliminary Site Assessment found site could be made to comply with new EPA regulations. 2. Internal assessment of ability of company ownership to meet increasing demands identified need for: * Greater environmental expertise * Financial strength * Longevity to shoulder perpetual responsibilities 3. Concluded best alternative was merger with Waste Management due to assessment of their exceptional: • Commitment to serve county, customers and be a good neighbor * Competence to meet environmental, legal and operational requirements Capability to meet financial demands and long-term responsibilities Post -Merger Actions 1. Waste Management has followed through by taking initiative and fully investing its expertise and financial resources in properly planning, investigating, upgrading and operating the facility. 931061 I,\ •ez:.1.rr,. Art.' a-" 1 \, x.. ;s,` ,. �1 IN. A' may. T ,F,: pp.. . M • T' w�1 J1 i ). �'.. 4 ter..... - I 77 :01;4-sc w 0trTE --i e., ; 1-r a».� �--� t. ," •� T l/lB 1. r— ; V• L 0A&T•-W sow Y�LD DPI • •.( I ;�_�� c=j�- k { CO- sit931061 . , Site History -- Baer (1991) to P esen • BNe of Facility 1. The Facility continues to provide solid waste disposal capability to the Central Weld Service Area, consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. Environmental Considerations 1. Actions taken at the Facility illustrate implementation of Waste Management Environmental Policy and Principles (copy attached). 2. Numerous activities have been made following the merger intent on improving environmental knowledge and safeguards at the Facility. * September/October 1991 - Completed the French Drain Diversion System. • • * December 1991 - Engaged Golder Associates as independent environmental consultant to perform a comprehensive site Hydrogeologic and Geotechnical Characterization study. * February 1992 - Engaged RUST Environment & Infrastructure (formally SEC Donahue) to prepare formal Design and Operations Plan. * February 1992 - Revised and adopted Special Waste Plan. * July 1992 - Received draft of Hydrogeologic and Geotechnical Characterization Report, containing identification of certain limited Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC). Immediate follow-up action included notification of State and County health agencies and impacted neighbor. * July 1992 - Performed confirmatory sampling of groundwater and underdrain. * September 1992 - Engaged Golder Associates to perform Expanded Hydrogeologic Investigation; report completed October 1992. * September 1992 - Engaged Golder Associates to perform Additional Surface Water Sampling and Analysis; report completed November 1992. * September 1992 - Completed Landfill Gas Monitoring Plan. 931061 * September 1992 - Completed revised Groundwater Monitoring Plan. * November 1992 - Submitted Conceptual Site Development Plan to Board of Weld County Commissioners, as requested. * November 1992 - Submitted Discharge Permit Application for Underdrain. * December 1992 - Submitted interim Remediation Proposal to mitigate the low-level VOC contamination. * December 1992 - Completed Preliminary Design, Operations, and Closure Plan. * January 1993 - Performed additional surface water testing as requested by Colorado Department of Health - Water Quality Division for the processing of the underdrain discharge permit; report completed March 1993. * March 1993 - Completed revision of "Site Documents" (list attached) to formalize and codify previous studies, along with responses to comments received from State and County health agencies. * April 1, 1993 - Voluntarily submitted (transmittal letter attached) Amendment Application for Certificate of Designation and Special Use Permit to allow for a formal, comprehensive review process of the Facility, including proposed remedial measures and additional engineering enhancements identified to benefit future operations and the environment. 931061 ® Waste Management, Inc. Environmental Policy On March 7, 1990, the Board of Directors of Waste Management, Inc, approved an expanded envy ronmental policy for the Company. The policy was developed and recommended by the Waste Man- agement Executive Environmental Committee. In developing the policy, the Committee gave careful consideration to the views of envi- ronmental groups. Environmental Protection and Enhancement Waste Reduction, Recycling, Treatment and Disposal Waste Management, Inc. is committed to protecting and enhancing the environment and to updating its practices in light of advances in technology and new understandings in health and environmental science. Prevention of pollution and enhancement of the environment are the fundamental premises of the Company's business. We believe that all corporations have a responsibility to conduct their business as responsible stewards of the environment and to seek profits only through activities that leave the Earth healthy and safe. We believe that the Company has a responsi- bility not to compromise the ability of future generations to sustain their needs. The principles of this policy are applicable to the Company throughout the world. The Com- pany will take demonstrable actions on a continuing basis in furtherance of the principles. Principles I. The Company is committed to improving the environment through the services that we offer and to providing our services in a manner demonstrably protective of human health and the environment, even if not required by law. We will minimize and strive not to allow any releases to the atmosphere, land, or water in amounts that may harm human health and the environment. We will train employees to enhance understanding of envi- ronmental policies and to promote excellence in job performance on all environmental matters. 2. The Company will work to minimize the volume and toxicity of waste generated by us and others. We will operate internal recycling programs. We will vigorously pursue opportunities to recycle waste before other managementpractices are applied. The Com- pany will use and provide environmentally safe treatment and disposal services for waste that is not eliminated at the source or recycled. Blodlversity 3, The Company is committed to the conservation of nature. We will implement a policy of "no net loss" of wetlands or other biological diversity on the Company's property, Sustainable Use of 4. The Company will use renewable natural resources, such as water, soils and forests, Natural Resources j in a sustainable manner and will offer services to make degraded resources once again usable. We will conserve nonrenewable natural resources through efficient use and care- ful planning. Wise Use of Energy Compliance 5. The Company will make every reasonable effon to use environmentally safe and sustainable energy sources to meet our needs. We will seek opportunities to improve energy efficiency and conservation in our operations. 6. The Company is committed to comply with all legal requirements and to implement programs and procedures to ensure compliance. These efforts will include training and testing of employees, rewarding employees who excel in compliance, and disciplining employees who violate legal requirements. a a s 921061 Waste Management, Inc. Environmental Policy Principles eoitinued • • • Risk Reduction 7. The Company will operate in a manner designed to minimize environmental, health or safety hazards. We will minimize risk and protect our employees and others in the vicinity of our operations by employing safe technologies and operating procedures and by being prepared for emergencies. The Company will make available to our employees and to the public information related to any of our operations that we believe cause environmental harm or pose health or safety hazards. The Company will encourage employees to report any condition that creates a danger to the environment or poses health or safety hazards, and will provide confidential means for them to do so. Damage 8. The Company will take responsibility for any harm we cause to the environment and Compensation will make every reasonable effort to remedy the damage caused to people or ecosystems. Research and Development Public Policy and Public Education Participation in Environmental Organizations Environmental Policy Assessment Annual Environmental Report 9. The Company will research, develop and implement technologies for integrated waste management. 10, The Company will provide information to and will assist the public in understanding the environmental impacts of our activities. We will conduct public tours of facilities, con- sistent with safety requirements, and will work with communities near our facilities to en- courage dialogue and exchange of information on facility activities. 11. The Company will support and participate in development of public policy and in educational initiatives that will protect human health and improve the environment. We will seek cooperation on this work with government, environmental groups, schools, uni- versities, and other public organizations. 12, The Company will encourage its employees to participate in and to support the work of environmental organizations, and we will provide support to environmental organizations for the advancement of environmental protection. 13. The Board of Directors of the Company will evaluate and will address the environ- mental implications of its decisions. The E:xecutivc Environmental Committee of the Company will report directly to the Chief Executive Officer of the Company and will monitor and report upon implementation of this policy and other environmental maucrs. The Company will commit the resources needed to implement these principles. 14. The Company will prepare and make public an annual report on its environmental activities. The report will include a self -evaluation of the Company's implementation of these principles, including an assessment of the Company's performance in complying with all applicable environmental laws and regulations throughout its worldwide operations. • 931064 Waste Services Corporation 6037 77th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80634 303/330-2641 March 31, 1993 Mr. Chuck Cunliffe, Director Department of Planning Services Weld County Administrative Offices 1400 North 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 A Waste Management Company Re: Central Weld Sanitary Landfill Submittal of Amendment Application for Special Use Permit No. 116 and related Certificate of Designation No. 26 Dear Mr. Cunliffe: Enclosed for your review and consideration are 25 copies of Waste Services Corporation's application to amend the existing Special Use Permit No. 116 and the related Certificate of Designation No. 26 for the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. These copies are for your use and distribution to the appropriate County departments and referral agencies. This proposal reflects our plans for continued proper operation and future proper closure of this facility. We are submitting this application and supporting information voluntarily and in a spirit of cooperation with Weld County although there is no state or local law or regulation requiring the amendment of the Certificate of Designation or the Special Use Permit. We maintain that the existing Certificate of Designation and the Special Use Permit have been complied with and continue to be valid. This submittal should not be construed as a waiver of any rights that we have under the current Certificate of Designation, the Special Use Permit, or the applicable laws and regulations. However, we hope that this proposal will result in a mutually acceptable Certificate of Designation and Special Use Permit modification. We look forward to working with you and the other referral representatives through this process to formalize our commitments, plans, and operations for the remaining reasonable life of this facility and its future proper closure. Please contact me at 330- 2641 if you desire additional information or clarification. Sincerely, Bill Hedberg Division V.P. - Landfill Operations cc: Weld County Commissioners, individually, w/o enclosures Lee Morrison, Assistant WC attorney, w/o enclosures John Pickle, WC Department of Health, w/o enclosures Glenn Mallory, Colorado Department of Health, w/o enclosures 931461 • • • SITE DOCUMENTS (1) "Design, Operations, and Closure Plan, Waste Services Corporation, Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, Weld County, Colorado", prepared by RUST Environment & Infrastructure, revised March 1993. (2) "Site Development Plan for Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, Weld County, Colorado", prepared by RUST Environment & Infrastructure, revised March 1993. (3) "Hydrogeologic and Geotechnical Characterization for the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, Weld County, Colorado", prepared by Golder Associates Inc. revised March 1993. (4) "Ground Water Monitoring Plan for the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, Weld County, Colorado", prepared by Golder Associates Inc. revised March, 1993. (5) "Landfill Gas Monitoring Plan for Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, Weld County, Colorado", prepared by Golder Associates Inc. revised March, 1993. (6) "Access Control Plan for Special Waste Identification at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill", prepared by Waste Management of Colorado, Inc. dated March, 1993. (7) "Interim Ground Water Measure Plan, Central Weld Sanitary Landfill", prepared by Golder Associates Inc. dated March, 1993. 931061 CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL I. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTS A. Hydrogeological Study 1. Development of hydrogeological model 2. definition of local/regional geologic setting 3. Determination of existing environmental conditions B. Groundwater Monitoring 1. Construction of additional monitoring wells 2. Expansion of groundwater monitoring parameters 3. Investigation of groundwater quality using other methods • II. DEVELOPMENT, OPERATION AND CLOSURE PLANS A. Development 1. Surface water management 2. Earth work requirements 3. Buffer area B. Operation 1. Fill sequencing 2. Surface water management C. Environmental monitoring 1. Groundwater monitoring 2. Landfill gas monitoring 931061 • • • 3. Surface water discharge D. Closure 1. Grading and Drainage 2. Revegetation E. Post -Closure (30 Year Period) 1. Site inspections 2. Site maintenance 3. Environmental monitoring III. ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS A. Interim Groundwater Remedial Measure B. Subtitle D Performance 1. Amended application 2. Environmental monitoring 3. Design criteria 4. Final cover 5. Closure/post-closure assurances C. Full Compliance 1. Obtain and comply with all permits 2. Continue environmental monitoring 3. Emphasize working relationships with Weld County and Colorado Department of Health 931061 • • • CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL I. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTS A. HYDROGEOLOGIC STUDY 1. Development of a hydrogeologic model Various investigations have been conducted at the site, including Warzyn, 1984; Industrial Compliance. 1991; Industrial Compliance, 1992; and, Golder, 1992. The Warzyn study include installation of five shallow groundwater monitoring wells (GWMW-1 through GWMW-5). Industrial Compliance's 1991 study included a conceptual design for the diversion ditch, as well as installation of seven trash piezpmeters and 10 piezometers (two of which remain active). The 1991 IC report included as -built drawings of the diversion ditch. Golder's 1992 investigation included installation of three additional shallow groundwater monitoring wells (GWMW-5N, GWMW-6, and GWMW-7), seven deep groundwater monitoring wells, 21 soil gas probes, seven geotechnical borings, and nine temporary groundwater sampling 1 9,106 • • • points. Golder's investigation also included sampling of each groundwater monitoring well, five surface water locations, and seven of the nine temporary sampling points (two were dry). The water quality results determined by Golder were subsequently confirmed by SEC Donohue. Based on the information collected during characterization activities, it has been determined that: • The landfill solid waste is not in contact with groundwater, with the exception of an isolated area near the northern boundary of the landfill (TP-1), where the groundwater table is maintained at an artificially high level by off -site irrigation activities; • Landfill gas concentrations are generally non -detectable, except near TP-1 where the concentrations are low. Landfill gas concentration distributions support the determination that solid waste is generally above the water table; • The diversion ditch and associated frenchdrain are functioning properly and as designed; • Shallow groundwater flow is generally from north to south towards the Big Thompson River, with slight southwest and southeast components of flow; • Deep groundwater flow is generally from northwest to southeast; 2 931061 • The potential for communication between the shallow and deep groundwater system is low based on water quality comparisons and the presence of a dry zone between the two aquifers; • Limited volatile organic compound impacts have been observed in the shallow groundwater system on the downgradient side of the landfill; • No impacts on the deep aquifer have been detected; and, • The nearest permitted water well is approximately 2000 feet from the landfill, which is about 100 times farther than the extent of VOC impacts to shallow groundwater. 2. Definition of local/regional hydrogeologic setting The CWSL is located approximately 4000 feet north of the northern margin of the Denver Basin. The primary aquifer underlying the site is the Laramie -Fox Hills aquifer, although this area of the aquifer is outside of the Denver Basin. Even with the extensive drilling program conducted at the site, it is not possible to determine which of the two geologic formations (Laramie Formation or Fox -Hills Formation) underlies the site due to the geologic similarities of these two formations. However, final determination of the geologic unit is not necessary for the purposes of demonstrating compliance with environmental regulations or for 3 931061 • S determining appropriate corrective actions. Three geologic units have been identified at the site: • The Surficial Unconsolidated Unit, • The Upper Weathered Bedrock; and, • The Lower Weathered Bedrock. The Surficial Unconsolidated Unit is a silty clay to clayey silt. The bedrock units range from sandstone to siltstone and claystone. It may be that the Upper Weathered Bedrock is the Laramie Formation, while the Lower Weathered Bedrock is the Fox -Hills Formation. Three saturated zones have been identified under the site. The first zone is perched, is present as a result of off -site irrigation activities, and is limited to the area near the northeast corner of the site. The second zone is approximately coincident with the top of the Upper Weathered Bedrock. The third zone occurs near the contact between the Upper and Lower Weathered Bedrock Units. Horizontal groundwater flow rate in the Upper Weathered Bedrock is approximately 95 feet per year (hydraulic conductivity of approximately 1 x 10' cm/sec, gradient of 0.03 ft/ft, and porosity of 0.3). Horizontal groundwater flow rate in the Lower 4 931061 • • • Weathered Bedrock is about 2 feet per year (hydraulic conductivity of 2.5 x 105 cm/sec, gradient of 0.02 ft/ft, and porosity of 0.3). Downward vertical gradient generally exist between the two bedrock aquifers. However, the presence of the dry zone indicates that the potential for communication between the two aquifers is low. Assuming that they do communicate (a worst case scenario), data indicate that downward groundwater flow rate is approximately 0.05 feet per year (hydraulic conductivity of 2 x 103 cm/sec, gradient of 0.8 ft/ft, and porosity of 0.3). The very low potential downward flow rate indicates that groundwater will flow predominately horizontally. 3. Determination of Existing Environmental Conditions Through water quality sampling described in Item No. 1 above (which is much more complete than any sampling previously conducted and goes well beyond current regulations), it was determined that four volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were consistently present in the shallow groundwater on the downgradient side of the landfill, within the buffer zone. These are 1,1-dichloroethane; 1,2-dichloroethane;trichlorocthene; and, tetrachloroethene. The maximum concentrations of 1,2- dichloroethane; trichloroethene; and tetrachloroethene slightly exceed State 5 9431061 • • • of Colorado and federal drinking water standards. VOCs were not detected in dep groundwater, indicating that the potential for communication between the two aquifers is low. No pesticides or herbicides were detected in any groundwater sample. This is important because the site was included on the CERCLIS due to alleged historic disposal of pesticide waste. Ammonia was detected in the deep aquifer, indicating that the deep aquifer is under natural reducing (anaerobic) conditions. The presence of nitrate in the upgradient shallow groundwater indicates that off -site irrigation is adversely impacting the quality of the shallow groundwater which migrates onto the landfill site. The cationlanion composition of the groundwater downgradient of the landfill was similar to the composition upgradient of the landfill, indicating that no significant change in water quality occurs as the water migrates beneath the landfill. Radionuclides and radioactivity appear to be natural and related to geologic materials occurring beneath and surrounding the site. 6 9.,,1.n6 The only surface water sample which exhibited a detectable concentration of VOCs was the landfill underdrain outlet. The landfill underdrain outlet exhibited detectable concentrations of 1,1-dichlorocthane and tetrachloroethane, each of which was present at or near the detection limit. Spomer Lake, which receives discharge from the underdrain, did not exhibit detectable concentrations of VOCs. No pesticides or herbicides were detected in any of the surface water samples. Nitrates were present in the surface water samples, again indicating that the surfaced water have been impacted by off -site irrigation activities. Major anion and cation concentrations were generally similar in all surface water samples, indicating that the surface water composition does not change appreciably as the surface water migrates around the site. Radionuclides and radioactivity were detected in the surface water samples as a result of the naturally occurring radioactivity in the geologic materials surrounding the site. Through a focused sampling of the creek water downstream of the landfill, it was determined that the milky -white color in the creek is probably being caused by natural conditions. 7 3W. • • II. DEVELOPMENT, OPERATION AND CLOSURE PLANS CWSL is located 5 miles southwest of Greeley and 3 miles northeast of Milliken. The landfill boundary consists of 110 acres. The Design, Operations and Closure Plan along with the supporting Site Development Plan, describe the design, operation and closure methods to be used by CWSL. These methods meet all applicable government requirements, as well as, the draft version of Subtitle D regulations. The following is a list of site documents which cover design, technical evaluation and environmental programs. (Refer to poster board) 8 • • SITE DOCUMENTS 1. "Design, Operations, and Closure Plan, Waste Services Corporation, Central Weld Sanitary landfill, Weld County, Colorado", prepared by RUST Environment & Infrastructure, revised March, 1993. 2. "Site Development Plan for Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, Weld County, Colorado", prepared by RUST Environment & Infrastructure, revised March, 1993. 3. "Hydrogeologic and Geotechnical Characterization for the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, Weld County, Colorado", prepared by Golder Associates Inc. revised March, 1993. 4. "Ground Water Monitoring Plan for the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, Weld County, Colorado", prepared by Golder Associates Inc., revised March, 1993. 5. "Landfill Gas Monitoring Plan for Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, Weld County, Colorado", prepared by Golder Associates Inc., revised March, 1993. 6. "Access Control Plan for Special Waste Identification at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill", prepared by Waste Management of Colorado, Inc. dated March, 1993. 9 931061 a • 7. "Interim Ground Water Measure Plan, Central Weld Sanitary Landfill", prepared by Golder Associates, Inc. dated March, 1993. A. DEVELOPMENT 1. Surface Water Management The landfill is located approximately 1/2 mile north of the Big Thompson floodplain. Surface drainage from the area is to the south toward the Big Thompson River. The surrounding area is primarily used for agriculture. Consequently, irrigation activities upgradient have required management of water levels within the landfill by the construction of a landfill underdrain, interceptor trench and the frenchdrain, The landfill underdrain and interceptor trench was constructed in late 1982 to 1983. The frenchdrain was constructed during 1991 and appears to be performing its function as geotechnical boring completed during the hydrogeologic investigation, and piezometer readings show that locations of the landfill downgradient hydraulically are dry. There appears to be a portion of the northwest corner of the landfill that information suggests that water levels have risen into an isolated pocket of the landfill. As part of an amended permit application submitted in March 1993, to 10 9310611. further enhance surface water management CWSL intends to do three things to lower water levels in this portion of the landfill. a. Construct a system of run-on, run-off perimeter ditches. The run- on ditch will intercept irrigation water and divert it along the north and toward an intermittent drainage on the eastern buffer property. Run-on in the northwest portion of the site will enter the site through an improved culvert system located along the northern property boundary. The water will then be conveyed to the west via a surface culvert to the upper most Spomer Lake. This enclosed system will prevent any infiltration into the landfill in the northwest portion of the site. b. Extend the existing frenchdrain system in the northwest portion of the landfill. This drain will be installed approximately one foot below the base of refuse and below water elevations in TP-1. This system will collect subsurface irrigation water and convey the watts to the west. c. An irrigation water control system which will collect subsurface irrigation water from upgradient sources and convey the water into the existing french drain. The combination of the extended 11 921061 • • • frenchdrain, surface water control diversions and the installation of the geonet are intended to lower water levels below the base of refuse in the northwest portion of the landfill. 2/3. Earth Work Requirements/Buffer Area Waste Service Corporation (WSC), has signed an agreement to purchase an additional 100 acres of land east, south and west of the existing site. This property will be used as a buffer. The landfill will not expand onto the buffer zone, rather, the buffer zone will be used for remedial measures and as a source of soils to be used in the operation and closure of CWSL. B. OPERATIONS The site is operated Monday through Saturday from 7:00 A.M. to 4:30 P.M. Appropriate signs are posted along the property boundary, entrance gate and on paved roads to allow for traffic control and safe disposal. Incoming waste loads are routinely inspected at the gate and again at the time of disposal. The facility has implemented a hazardous waste exclusion program and is further described in the Access Control Plan for Special Waste Identification. This program provides a plan to identify and screen both visually and through extensive analytical 12 • • testing that no regulated radioactive waste, hazardous waste or PCB wastes are received at the site. CWSL does currently receive special wastes such as petroleum contaminated soils and medical wastes only after testing or other information indicates the material to be non -hazardous and non-infectious. Site operating procedures include actions to minimize nuisance conditions such as odor, dust, vector noise and litter control. 1. Fill Sequencing CWSL site development plans for the landfill calls for development of the landfill in six sequences. Generally the sequence begins in the north end of the existing fill and proceeds to the south. The fill sequence provides for a orderly approach to filling and approach to control surface water run-on/run-off. The development of the site also includes construction of a module comprising about 5 acres of the site which will include a liner and leachate collection system. C. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 1. Ground Water Monitoring CWSL has implemented extensive environmental monitoring in anticipation of Subtitle D to include groundwater, landfill gas, and surface water, monitoring. 13 9701064.,„ • • • The groundwater monitoring program has been tripled from 5 wells to include an additional 10 shallow and deep wells, upgradient and downgradient of the site. The parameters have been expanded to meet the requirements under Subtitle D. Based upon the number and locations of the deep and shallow wells upgradient and downgradient, provides for a comprehensive monitoring network that closely monitors groundwater at the site. An additional three point of compliance wells are prepared to further enhance the monitoring program downgradient of the site. ,v� These wells are monitored on nine quality> bases for an extensive list of constituents, including metals, volatile organic compounds, radioactives and pesticides. 2. Landfill Gas Monitoring CWSL has also installed 20 gas probes around the perimeter of the site including the gate house and maintenance facility. Gas monitoring is currently conducted in a quarterly basis on all 20 gas probes. 3. Surface Wafer Monitoring Surface water monitoring is voluntarily done on a quarterly basis to characterize surface water entering and leaving the site. These surface water sampling points the north discharge point, the underdrain and 14 92.106 • • • frenchdrain water. D. CLOSURE 1. Grading and Drainage The final elevation of the site is approximately 4870 which equates to approximately 40 feet higher than existing ground on the north area. The final contours of the site were designed to achieve proper drainage and blend in with the surrounding area to ease the concerns of height and view restrictions. The final cover side slope of 4.1 and minimum top slope of 5% were designed to provide consistent run-off while minimizing erosion and prevent ponding. The final cover on the landfill will consist of a total of 4.5 feet of soil. A six inch foundation layer, an 18 inch bather layer having a hydraulic conductivity of less than or equal to 1 x 104 cm/sec, a 24 -inch thick protective layer and a 6 inch thick vegetative soil layer. 2. Revegetation All areas of final cover will consistof placing shallow rooted native grasses as recommended by the Soil Conservation Service. The buffer property consisting of approximately 100 acres will serve as soil for daily, intermediate, liner and 15 • S s final cover. The approximate borrow volume within the secondary buffer area is 500,000. The final contouring of the excavated area will not exceed 25% slope, and will provide for positive drainage and improved agriculture production. E. POST -CLOSURE Upon the completion of site closure activities, post closure care will be conducted as required by State regulations. Post Closure will include: • Prevention or minimization of nuisance conditions • Site inspections of final cover and vegetative areas • Groundwater monitoring • Gas Monitoring • Security fence and enclosure inspections 16 92106t • • S M. ENVIRONMENTAL CommaE1iENTs A. Interim Groundwater Remedial Measure WSC acknowledges that shallow groundwater immediately downgradient of the landfill contains VOCs which are slightly above recognized standards and has committed to take actions to return these concentrations back to acceptable levels. Two primary mechanisms have been proposed to accomplish this goal: (1) re- designing the diversion trench and french drain and (2) evaluating the effectiveness of air sparging. Re -designing the diversion trench and french drain system is necessary to deal with the unnaturally high water table present upgradient of the land fill due to the off -site irrigation practices. It is anticipated that the re -design will effectively reduce the water table near TP-I to below the base of solid waste and thereby remove the only verified source of impacts to shallow groundwater. In addition, in order to treat the existing conditions, a pilot -scale test of air sparging has been proposed. Air sparging is the process of injecting air into the groundwater to achieve remediation of the groundwater and saturated soils. Air injection wells are used to apply positive air pressure to the aquifer. Air bubbles contacting the dissolved/adsorbed compounds cause the compounds to volatilize. The air carrying the volatilized compounds is allowed to migrate to the ground surface 17 91'1064 through natural mechanisms, or its migration is enhanced through use of vapor extraction wells. Naturally occurring biologic activity is also enhanced by air sparging. The pilot -scale test has been proposal to be conducted near GWMW-5, for the following reasons: • • Monitoring well GWMW-5 generally exhibited the highest concentrations of VOCs in groundwater; • Monitoring well GWMW-5 is located in the general direction of shallow groundwater flow from the landfill; • Additional monitoring locations such as SG -9 and GWMW-5N are in close proximity to GWMW-5, which will provide supplemental data; and, • GWMW-5 is located on the buffer property, which provides sufficient room for proper installation and spacing of the air sparging well and observation points. Results of the pilot scale test will be used to determine the effectiveness of this remedial technique at the site and will be submitted to the CDR and WCDH for review. If the pilot scale test near GWMW-5 proves to be successful, additional air sparging wells will be installed at other locations near the site, If the air 18 92106_ s • • sparging pilot scale test indicates that this remedial technique is not suitable for the CWSL, other remedial techniques will be evaluated. The CWSL, as currently sited meets the location restrictions under Subtitle D including: • Airports - not located within 10,000 feet of any airport • Floodplain - the landfill footprint is not located in a 100 year floodplain, according to the Federal Emergency Management Agency. • Seismic Zones - the CWSL is not located in an area of active faults. • Wetlands - the landfill footprint is not located in any wetlands. • Unstable Area - the landfill is not located in an unstable area. 19 921061 ACE CONTOUR MIC 5 J Q Q 2 O 2 N a R z OO az 0 J aer O �`4 U 2 W n wW W3 J Ncc <0— W U C) 0 443 rn a") 0 y u I • • • 921061. ir �yy 43? r C r_i �A\ -MLERADIUS ‘..?Z" ^1 / A JI' 7)C 760 5 .,Daniels 4g -oft — Sch ode .,0 7 \ \ �l y i .7/5 / r\ a o 72 i X99 / • / • . -'4835 O r.. 'AV / N. u $11090 I EX1 a' Of [IOC IMPACTS TO GROUNDWATER 0° wosso. t% \`) NI O #7e6 469 4 4' EXPLANATION NL1 €EH OF PERNITI'ED WELLS N OUAR'TER/OUARTEB SECTION WELL PERMr NIAvBER SEE TEXT FOR DISCX.ISSION Denver, Colorado cuorr/wRWASTE SERVICES CORPORATION CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL llMwN _ -OS PERMITTED WELLS WITHN A OPE PALE RADIUS OF THE SITE h Al KAW AVE AAY TD92 Wawa, SCALE r-2000' 40e NO. 913_2403 Dwc NO./HEN. NO. WEN Fad NO C1cvRc NO, 2-4 11,-71.064 • • • VAPOR EXTRACTION WELL DIRECTION OF SOIL GAS / AIR FLOW I oo 00 MONITORING AIR SPARGING PROBE WELL -";\ ••po00 •:6°C60 ° % °o° OCP ° ° ° O SOURCE MCCOY ASSOCIATES NC.. 1993. O ° de �OO °'O ate O°OOOOO 0o 08Ogg ,a° Q O° °O 8 pp�O O °O0OO O 0 8 080 °0°8 $OOO V ° ° O OO ° CONTAMINATED SOIL �°°°�°p . °4�ao0� AND GROUNDWATER 80 00 f�oo 08 °• • -�°q • •• :4 O p �O0 0 O OO 0 O ^,E Golder Associates Denver, Colorado TYPICAL AIR SPARGING SYSTEM EN' 'PRJJEC WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL DRAWN KAW �o�'E MARCH 1993 s2A:C N.TS. It," "0 WEH Rcar; WEH '°'l "c` 913-2403 '5WC "O./RN "G t(*UWE " . 5-1 I. ALLEGED VIOLATION 1. 1. TEERE IS NO VIOLATION or 30-20-103 FOR FAILURE TO SUBMIT AN ENGINEERING DESIGN AND OPERATIONS PLAN. A. 30-20-103 IS AN APPLICATION STATUTE - - IT PERTAINS TO THE MANNER IN WHICH ONE APPLIES FOR A CERTIFICATE OF DESIGNATION TO OPERATE A SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL SITE IT IS NOT AN OPERATION STATUTE. THE TESTXS WHAT WAS LAW AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION, NOT WHAT WHAT THE LAW IS NOW. IN ADDITION, 30-20-103 AND ITS PREDECESSORS HAVE NEVER REQUIRED, AN ENGINEERING DESIGN AND OPERATIONS PLAN -- THAT REQUIREMENT IS A CREATURE OF REGULATION -- SO WE MUST ALSO LOOK AT THE REGULATIONS OF THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH IN EFFECT IN SEPTEMBER OF 1971. B. THE PREDECESSOR TO 30-20-103 WAS 36-23-3 WHICH WAS INITIALLY ADOPTED IN 1967 AND WHICH WAS AMENDED IN 1971 EFFECTIVE APRIL 24, 1971 THE 1971 AMENDMENT ADDED LANGUAGE TO 36-23-3 AS FOLLOWS: THE APPLICATION SHALL ALSO CONTAIN SUCH ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL, HYDROLOGICAL, AND OPERATIONAL DATA AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY TEE DEPARTMENT BY REGULATION. TEE APPLICATION SHALL BE REFERRED TO THE DEPARTMENT FOR REVIEW AND FOR RECOMMENDATION AS TO APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL, JUICE SHALL BE BASED UPON CRITERIA ESTABLISHED BY THE STATE BOARD OF HEALTH, TEE STATE MATER POLLUTION CONTROL COMMISSION, AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL COMKISSION. ALSO AMENDED WAS 36-23-5 BY ADDING LANGUAGE: TEE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SHALL NOT ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF DESIGNATION WERE TEE DEPARTMENT HAB RECOMMENDED DISAPPROVAL PURSUANT TO SECTION 36-23- 3. THE STATUTE PRIOR TO 1971 MANDATED THAT THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH ENACT REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE OPERATION OF SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL SITES (DUMPS) AND REQUIRED NO INVOLVEMENT OF THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH IN THE PERMITTING OF SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL SITES WHICH WAS THEN STRICTLY A COUNTY FUNCTION. INDEED THE SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL STATUTE WAS IN THE ARTICLE DEALING WITH COUNTY POWERS AIpj'UNCTIONS. 931061. • THE 1967 REGULATIONS OF THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH WERE BRIEF AND DEALT EXCLUSIVELY WITH OPERATIONAL MATTERS AND WE COMPLY. C. THE REGULATIONS ISSUED BY THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH PURSUANT TO THE 1971 AMENDMENT WERE NOT ADOPTED UNTIL FEBRUARY 16, 1972, AND WERE NOT EFFECTIVE UNTIL APRIL 1, 1972. IN THEIR PRESENT FORM THEY CALL FOR AN "ENGINEERING DESIGN AND OPERATIONS REPORT". THIS FACILITY NOW COMPLIES WITH THESE REGULATIONS. IT IS NOT CLEAR FROM THE CURRENT REGULATIONS WHAT THE COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH INTENDED WITH REGARD TO THE APPLICABILITY OF THE NEW REGULATIONS TO EXISTING FACILITIES INCLUDING THOSE PERMITTED AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE 1971 STATUTORY AMENDMENT AND BEFORE THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE REGULATIONS. AUSTIN N. BUCKINGHAM, GEOLOGISTS, HAZARDOUS MATERIALS AND WASTE MANAGEMENT DIVISION OF THE COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, IN A LETTER TO KENT E. HANSON DATED SEPTEMBER 18, 1992 STATED THAT THE 1972 REGULATION PROVIDED THAT ALL EXISTING FACILITIES WITH A CERTIFICATE OF DESIGNATION WERE "GRANDFATHERED". YOU NEED NOT RELY ON MR. BUCKINGHAM, HOWEVER, THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY IN THE 1991 AMENDMENT TO THE SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL ACT, WHICH IS NOW UNDER THE STATUTORY ARTICLE "HEALTH" PROVIDED: NO EXISTING SOLID WASTES DISPOSAL SITE AND FACILITY WHICH IS OPERATING PURSUANT TO A VALID CERTIFICATE OF DESIGNATION BEALL BE DEEMED TO BE IN VIOLATION OF ANY PROVISION or THIS PART 1 BECAUSE OF ANY FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH APPLICATION PROCEDURES WHICH ARE ENACTED SUBSEQUENT TO THE ISSUANCE OF SUCH CERTIFICATE OP DESIGNATION. C.R.S. 30-20-103.5, SB 91-174, effective June 5, 1991. IF YOU ARE STILL NOT CONVINCED THAT THE REQUIREMENT OF A "ENGINEERING DESIGN AND OPERATIONS REPORT" OR "PLAN" DOES NOT APPLY TO CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL, CONSIDER THE TESTIMONY OF ORVILLE STODDARD AT THE SEPTEMBER 22. 1971 HEARING BEFORE THE WELD COUNTY COMMISSIONERS. ACCORDING TO MR. STODDARD THE APPLICANT HAD ESSENTIALLY COMPLIED. HE STATED: THANt YOU. MY NANO IS ORVILLE STODDARD WITS TEE ENGINEERING SECTION OF COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF EXALTS. THERE IS AN AMENDED ACT PERTAINING TO TEE REGULATION OF LAND DISPOSAL SITES AND FACILITIES TEAT EARL MOFFAT MENTIONED. THIS REQUIRES THE APPLICANT TO SUBMIT A REPORT Or ENGINEERING. GEOLOGICAL, EYROLOGICAL, AND OPERATIONAL DATA TO THE DEPARTMENT FOR REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED APPROVAL PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE CERTIFICATE OF DESIGNATION BY THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS. TEE SITE WAS VISITED MITE MR. MOFFATT, GLEN PAUL OF THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT, AND AT TEAT TIME THE GUILELINES FOR DEVELOPING THIS REPORT WERE REVIEWED WITH WITH MR. mortar. ER DID SUBMIT A REPORT TO 9;106 THE DEPARTMENT, AUGUST 9, 1971, AND DID HAVE CONSIDERABLE INFORMATION OF THE TYPE WE WERE AFTER. THE INFORMATION SUBMITTED INDICATE(S) AFTER STUDYING THE SOIL REPORTS, THE TEST BORINGS, INFORMATION ON THE EXISTING WATER TABLE, SOIL CONDITIONS IN THE AREA, THAT THIS SITE CAN 3E OPERATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SANITARY LANDFILL REQUIRMENTS. ALSO, THE DEPARTMENT IS REQUIRED TO DEVELOPS AND PROMULGATE RULES AND REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO THE ENGINEERING DESIGN AND OPERATION. THESE ARE TO BE PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF HEALTH AT THEIR REGULAR MEETING IN OCTOBER FOR ADOPTION. THIS IS A SUITABLE SITE AND CAN BE OPERATED AS A SANITARY LANDFILL. THE ONLY QUESTION WE HAVE AT THIS POINT IN TIME, AND MR. MOFFAT TOUCHED ON THAT, IS THAT THERE ARE SEVERAL ALTERNATIVES IN HOW THE OPERATION SHOULD PROCEED AND THIS IS JUST A MATTER OF DECIDING WHICH IS THE BEST WAY TO GO. Transcript of September 21, 1971 Hearing, Pages 4- 5. THEREFORE, IT IS RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, THAT THE REQUIREMENT OF 30-20-103 AND ITS ACCOMPANYING REGULATION THAT AN APPLICANT FILE AND ENGINEERING DESIGN AND OPERATION PLAN IS NOT APPLICABLE TO THIS SITE, AND EVEN IF BY SOME EXTENDED STRETCH OF THE IMAGINATION IT DOES APPLY, IT IS RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED THAT IT WAS FOR ALL INTENTS AND PURPOSES COMPLIED WITH. II. ALLEGED VIOLATION 2. IT IS ALLEGED THAT CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL DISCHAGES POLLUTANTS INTO THE SURFACE WATER WITHOUT THE REQUIRED DISCHARGE PERMITS. THE WATER QUALITY CONTROL COMMISSION IS THE AGENCY PRIMARILY CHARGED WITH ENFORCEMENT OF ITS RULES AND APPLICABLE STATUTES. THE ALLEGATION DEALS WITH THE LACK OF A DISCHARGE PERMIT FOR DISCHARGE FROM THE LOWER END OF THE UNDERDRAIN IN THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE FACILITY. THE ALLEGATION DOES NOT DEAL WITH MILKY WATER OR ODORS FROM SPOMER LAKES OR THE STREAM WATER IN THE AREA. THE CONSENSUS OF OPINION OF THE CONSULTANTS OF WASTE SERVICES, INC., AND THE COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH IS THAT THESE DISTURBING PHENOMENA ARE THE RESULT OF CONTAMINANTS IN THE SURFACE WATER WITH COMPARABLE CONCENTRATIONS UP GRADIENT OF THE LANDFILL AND CANNOT, THEREFORE, BE ATTRIBUTED TO THE LANDFILL. WASTE SERVICES, INC., WAS NOT AWARE THAT IT WAS *DISCHARGING ANY POLLUTANTS INTO THE SURFACE WATERS SO AS TO REQUIRE A DISCHARGE PERMIT UNTIL THE MIDDLE OF 1992 AS A RESULT OF AN AGRESSIVE AND 93106 EXPANDED TESTING REGIMEN THAT WAS INITIATED VOLUNTARILY BY WASTE SERVICES. THE ORIGINAL INTENT OF THE UNDERDRAIN WAS TO CONTROL GROUNDWATER LEVELS AND NOT TO DISCHARGE POLLUTANTS. THIS AGGRESSIVE TESTING INCLUDED THE INSTALLATION OF ADDITIONAL MONITORING WELLS FOR BOTH DEEP AND SHALLOW GROUND WATER, INSTALLATION OF TRASH PIEZOMETERS, AND INSTALLATION OF ADDITIONAL SOIL GAS PROBES. IN ADDITION, AND MOST DIRECTLY ON POINT, THE IT INCLUDED THE EXPAINSION OP THE TESTING PROTOCOL TO INCLUDE A LARGE NUMBER OF ADDITIONAL CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS, INCLUDING VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS AND METALS. VOC'S WERE DETECTED AT THE UNDERDRAIN DISCHARGE POINT WHICH DISCHARGES INTO, OR NEAR, SPOMER LAKE NUMBER 2. NO VOC'S HAVE BEEN DETECTED IN SPOMER LAKE NUMBER 2 OR AT ANY DOWNSTREAM LOCATION. VOC'S ARE VOLATILE AND ARE TREATED BY ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT. MANGANESE IS THE ONLY METAL DETECTABLE AT THE UNDERDRAIN IN CONCENTRATIONS DEMONSTRABLY IN EXCESS OF THE UPGRADIENT SURFACE WATER. APPLICATION FOR THE DISCHARGE PERMIT WAS MADE IN NOVEMBER OF 1992 AND IS PENDING AND THE ISSUANCE OF THE PERMIT IS EXPECTED IN THE NEAR FUTURE. BOTH THE COLORADO DEPAR OF HEALTH AND THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT DO NOT SEEK ENFORCEMENT ON THE BASIS OF THIS TECHNICAL VIOLATION WHILE THE APPLICATION IS PENDING AND BEING PURSUED IN GOOD FAITH WITH DUE DILIGENCE. III ALLEGED VIOLATION 3. THERE IS NO VIOLATION OF 2.1.2 OR 2.1.4 OF THE SOLID WASTE REGULATIONS WITH RESPECT TO THE OPERATION OF THE CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL ATLFGED VIOLATION 3 DEALS WITH THE CONTAMINATION OF THE SHALLOW GROUND WATER WITH VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS AND METALS (MANGANESE). THIS CONTAMINATION IS MINOR AND WASTE SERVICES, INC., WILL TAKE EVERY PRACTICABLE STEP TO REDUCE OR ELIMINATE IT. THE CONTAMINATION IS "MINOR" BECAUSE THE LEVELS DETECTED BARELY EXCEED THE GROUND WATER AND DRINKING WATER STANDARDS; THE MIGRATION OF THE CONTAMINATION IS VERY LIMITED; THE FUTURE MIGRATION OF THE CONTAMINATION, IF ANY, WILL BE EXTREMELY SLOW; AND THE REMEDIAL ACTION WHICH HAS BEEN SUGGESTED WITH KNOWN TECHNOLOGY CAN CORRECT IT. THIS CONTAMINATION WAS DISCOVERED BY WASTE SERVICES, INC., AND REPORTED TO THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT AND THE COLORADO HEALTH DEPARTMENT IN MID 1992. 931061 THE TESTING CONDUCTED BY WASTE SERVICES, THOUGH IT WILL BE UTLIMATELY REQUIRED BY REGULATION IN 1996 (SUBTITLE D), WAS VOLUNTARY AND WAS CONDUCTED PURSUANT TO THE POLICY AND PRACTICES OF WASTE MANAGEMENT OF NORTH AMERICA, INC. THERE ARE REALLY TWO ISSUES WHICH ULTIMATELY HAVE TO BE DECIDED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS: 1. DOES TEE PRESENCE OF VOLATILE ORGANIC CHEMICALS IN THE SHALLOW GROUNDWATER, WITHOUT MORE, CONSTITUTE A VIOLATION OF REGULATIONS OF THE COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, AB ALLEGED; AND, IF SO, 2. WHAT IS THE BEST COURSE OF ACTION, (1) THE PREMATURE CLOSING OF TEE FACILITY FOLLOWING A SHOW CAUSE HEARING, OR (2) REMEDIATION AND CORRECTIVE ACTION WITH CLOSURE IN ACCORDANCE WITS APPROPRIATE DESIGN AND STANDARDS. THE SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL SITES AND FACILITIES REGULATIONS PROVIDE AS FOLLOWS: 2.1.2 SUCH SITES AND FACILITIES SHALL COMPLY WITH THE HEALTH LAWS, STANDARDS, RULES, AND REGULATIONS OF THE DEPARTMENT, THE WATER QUALITY CONTROL COMMISSION, THE AIR QUALITY CONTROL COMMISSION, AND ALL APPLICABLE ZONING LAWS AND ORDINANCES. 2.1.4 A SITE AND FACILITY OPERATED AS A SANITARY LANDFILL SHALL PROVIDE MEANS OF FINALLY DISPOSING OF SOLID WASTES ON LAND (1) IN A MANNER TO MINIMIZE NUISANCE CONDITIONS SUCH AS ODORS, WINDBLOWN DEBRIS, INSECTS, RODENTS, AND SMOKE; (2) SHALL PROVIDE COMPACTED FILL MATERIAL; (3) SHALL PROVIDE ADEQUATE COVER WITH SUITABLE MATERIAL AND SURFACE DRAINAGE DESIGNED TO PREVENT FORDING OF WATER AND WIND EROSION AND PREVENT WATER AND AIR POLLUTION; AND, (4) UPON BEING FILLED, SHALL BE LEFT IN A CONDITION OF ORDERLINESS AND GOOD AESTHETIC APPEARANCE AND CAPABLE OF BLENDING WITH THE SURROUNDING AREA. IN THE OPERATION OF THE SITE AND FACILITY, THE SOLID WASTES (1) SHALL BE DISTRIBUTED IN THE SMALLEST AREA CONSISTENT WITH HANDLING TRAFFIC TO BE UNLOADED; (2) SHALL BE PLACED IN THE MOST DENSE VOLUME PRACTICABLE USING MOISTURE AND COMPACTION OR OTHER METHOD APPROVED BY THE DEPARTMENT; (3) SHALL BE FIRE, INSECT, AND RODENT RESISTANT THROUGH THE APPLICATOON OF AN ADEQUATE LAYER OR (SIC) OF INERT MATERIAL AT REGULAR INTERVALS; AND s72:1.06_ • • • (4) SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OF WINDBLOWN DEBRIS WHICH SHALL BE COLLECTED REGULARLY AND PLACED INTO THE FILL. 1.2 "NUISANCE CONDITIONS" ARE THOSE WHICH NAY RESULT FROM EXPLOSIVE GAS, BIRD HAZARDS, DISEASE VECTORS, ODORS, . . . HATER POLLUTION, AIR POLLUTION, NOISE POLLUTION, AND TRAFFIC CONGESTION. 3.11.5 OF THE WATER QUALITY CONTROL COMMISSION REGULATIONS ESTABLISHES GROUND WATER QUALITY STANDARDS AND IS TOO EXTENDED FOR QUOTATION HERE. THE EXISTENCE OF CONTAMINANTS IS NOT Al PER SE VIOLATION OF THE REGULATIONS. MORE MUST BE SHOWN TO SHOW A VIOLATION OF THE REGULATIONS OR PROBABLE CAUSE THAT A VIOLATION HAS OCCURRED. 2.1.4 OF THE SOLID WASTE REGULATIONS IS THE CENTRAL ISSUE. THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN; (1) MINIMIZE, AND,(2) PREnS1VP; IS IMPORTANT. MINIMIZE IS USED WITH RESPECT TO "NUISANCE CONDITIONS" WHIG[ INCLUDES, BY DEFINITION, WATER POLLUTION. PREVENT IS USED WITH RESPECT TO WATER POLLUTION AND PONDINC. RESULTING FROM (INJADEQUATE COVER WITH SUITABLE MATERIAL AND SURFACE DRAINAGE. THERE IS NO EVIDENCE THAT THE CONTAMINATION WHICH HAS OCCURRED IS THE RESULT OF INADEQUATE COVER, UNSUITABLE MATERIALS OR PONDING.. THE EVIDENCE IS THAT: (1) THE COVER ON THE LANDFILL HAS BEEN REGULARLY INSPECTED DURING THE LIFE OF THE FACILITY AND HAS ALWAYS BEEN APPROVED; (2) THAT THE ONLY POND ON THE SITE IS NOT ON THE FACILITY AND DOES NOT CONTRIBUTE TO THE CONTAMINATION; (3) THE EVIDENCE IS THAT THE ONLY WATER IN THE LANDFILL IS THE RESULT OF RISING GROUND WATER TABLES NOT INADEQUATE COVER. (4) FLUCTUATIONS IN THE GROUND WATER LEVELS IS A FUNCTION OF OFF SITE IRRIGATION ACTIVITIES NOT ANY DEFICIENCY IN THE COVER. (5) FLUCTUATIONS IN THE GROUND WATER TABLE CAN BE ELIMINATED, OR SUBSTANTIALLY REDUCED, BY UPGRADIENT DIVERSION WHICH HAS BEEN UNDERTAKEN AND WHICH IS PLANNED. THEREFORE, THERE BEING NO DEFICIENCY IN THE COVER. DESIGN OR MATERIALS, OR. NO DEMONSTRABLE DEFECT IN THE DESIGN OR MATERIALS IN THE COVER, THERE IS NO VIOLATION OP 2.1.4 WITH REPECT TO "MINIMIZE" AND "NUISANCE CONDITIONS" INCLUDING WATER POLUTION, LET'S REVISIT THE LANGUAGE OF THE REGULATION WHICH 93106 • STATES: 2.1.4 A SITE AND FACILITY OPERATED AS A SANITARY LANDFILL SHALL PROVIDE MEANS OF FINALLY DISPOSING OF SOLID WASTES ON LAND (1) IN A MANNER TO MINIMIZE NUISANCE CONDITIONS SUCH AS ODORS, WINDBLOWN DEBRIS, INSECTS, RODENTS, AND SMOKE; 1.2 "NUISANCE CONDITIONS" ARE THOSE WHICH MAY RESULT FROM EXPLOSIVE GAS, BIRD HAZARDS, DISEASE VECTORS, ODORS, . WATER POLLUTION, AIR POLLUTION, NOISE POLLUTION, AND TRAFFIC CONGESTION. THE TWO PIVOTAL TERMS ARE "MINIMIZE" AND "WHICH MAY RESULT FROM". THESE TERMS, OR PHRASES, PREVENT YOU FROM REACHING THE CONCLUSION THAT THE CONTAMINENTS IN THE SHALLOW GROUND WATER, ALONE AND WITHOUT MORE, CONSTITUTE A VIOLATION OF 2.1.4. "MINIMIZE" CONNOTES A REALISTIC CONCLUSION THAT NO HUMAN ACTIVITY, INCLUDING THE OPERATION OF A SANITARY LANDFILL, IS WITHOUT ENVIORNMENTAL RISK OR ENVIORNMENTAL IMPACT. PERFECTION IS NOT EXPECTED BY THIS REGULATION. WHAT IS EXPECTED IS THAT THE OPERATOR WILL "MINIMIZE" THE CONTAMINATION. WASTE SERVICES, INC., HAS FULFILLED ITS OBLIGATION BY: 1. AGGRESSIVELY TESTING, 2. PROMPTLY REPORTING, 3. PROPOSING AND TAKING REMEDIAL ACTION, 4. AND THE WILLINGNESS AND RESOURCES TO TAKE REMEDIAL ACTION WHEN APPROVED BY THE APPROPRIATE AGENCY OR AGENCIES. "WHICH MY RESULT FROM _ . . WATER POLLUTION" CONNOTES A REALISTIC REGULATORY CONCLUSION THAT CONTAMINATION IS NOT, IN AND OF ITSELF, A "NUISANCE CONDITION". A NUISANCE CONDITION "MAY RESULT FROM" CONTAMINATION OF THE GROUND WATER BUT NO SUCH RESULT HAS BEEN SHOWN TO EXIST NOR HAS IT BEEN DESCRIBED. THIS POSITION IS CONTRARY TO THAT APPARENTLY TAKEN BY THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTENT AND THE COLORADO HEALTH DEPARTMENT WHO HAVE CONCLUDED THAT THE MERE EXISTANCE OF CONTAMINATION IS A "NUISANCE CONDITION." IV. ALLEGED VIOLATION 4. VIOLATION 4 IS FOR ALL PRACTICAL PURPOSES THE SAME AS VIOLATION 3 IN TERMS OF THE INTERPRETATION OF THE REGULATION. IT ADDS THE ALLEGATION THAT THE OPERATOR HAS PERMITTED TRASH TO COME INTO CONTACT WITH GROUND WATER. TRASH IS IN CONTACT WITH GROUND WATER IN THE NORTH END OF THE FACILITY. THIS DOES NOT ARISE BECAUSE 07 ANY COVER OR ON SITE DRAINAGE PROBLEM. THIS RESULTS FROM THE ENCROACHMENT OF GROUND INTO THE TRASH CAUSED BY UP GRADIENT SURFACE WATER USAGE. Q i'6 t REMEDIAL ACTION HAS BEEN PROPOSED AND IMPLEMENTATION OF SOME REMEDIAL ACTION HAS ALREADY OCCURRED. WASTE SERVICES, INC., AND ITS CONSULTANTS ARE CONFIDENT THAT REMEDIAL ACTION WILL ELIMINATE THIS PROBLEM. THE VIOLATION NOTICE INDICATES THAT THIS CONDITION IS IN VIOLATION OF PROPOSED REGULATIONS. VIOLATION OF "PROPOSED REGULATIONS," IS NOT A VIOLATION. WHILE THE VIOLATION MAY HAVE BEEN IN VIOLATION OF REGULATIONS PROPOSED AT THE TIME OF THE NOTICE, IT IS NOT IN VIOLATION OF ANY EXISTING REGULATION OR ANY REGULATION CURRENTLY PROPOSED. THE SECOND QUESTION IS, IF YOU FIND THAT A VIOLATION EXISTS WHAT SHOULD BE DONE ABOUT IT. THE COURSE UPON WHICH YOU ARE NOW EMBARKED COULD LEAD TO A SHOW CAUSE HEARING WHICH COULD LEAD TO A TERMINATION OF THE USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW WHICH WOULD INEV]:TABLY LEAD TO A PREMATURE CLOSING OF THE FACILITY. THIS COURSE OF ACTION IS, AMONG OTHER THINGS, 1. CONTRARY TO THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH; 2. CONTRARY TO THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE WELD COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND PLANNING; 3. CONTRARY TO THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF ENGINEERING AND ENVIORNMENTAL SPECIALISTS RETAINED BY WASTE SERVICES, INC.; 4. CONTRARY TO THE RECOMMENDATION OF WASTE SERVICES, INC.; 5. CONTRARY TO A MORE COMPHREHENSIVE AND MODERN REGULATORY SCHEME ENVISIONED BY SUBTITLE D; and, 6. CONTRARY TO THE LONG TERM BEST INTERESTS OF THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS. WASTE SERVICES, INC., HAS BEFORE YOU A PROPOSAL FOR AMENDMENT OF SPECIAL USE PERMIT NO. 11.6 AND TO THE CERTIFICATE OF DESIGNATION WHICH, IF APPROVED, WOULD PROVIDE A COMPHREHENSIVE DESIGN AND OPERATIONS PLAN FOR THE FUTURE OPERATION OF THE FACILITY, MONITORING FOR ENVIORNMENTAL IMPACTS, PROVISION FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION IN THE EVENT OF ADVERSE ENVIORNMENTAL IMPACT, AND THE ORDERLY CLOSING OF THE FACILITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH CURRENT ENGINEERING AND ENVIORNMENTAL PRACTICES. THE PREMATURE CLOSURE OF THE FACILITY WITHOUT AN OPPORTUNITY TO DESIGN ADEQUATE ON SITE DRAINAGE AND WITHOUT ADEQUATE DRAINAGE CONTOURS WOULD BE A MISTAKE WITH LONG LASTING IMPACTS. 32106 Current Recommendations and Anendment Process • 1. The present environmental concerns of the Facility have been fully addressed in the Amendment Application filed April 1, 1993. 2. The Facility should be allowed to continue to provide quality solid waste disposal service to our customers, the residents and commercial businesses of the Central Weld Service Area (see attached letters of recommendation). 3. The Amendment Application will be comprehensively reviewed by numerous governmental or quasi -governmental agencies through the normal referral process. Any additional comments which may be expressed about the Facility will be fully addressed in the amendment process. • • 90,1061. Apr. 1. '93 15:44 4%5 EDAP TEL 303352-2436 P. 2 Giltti liattlawflo+ev March 31, 1993 Ms. Connie Harbert Chairperson Weld County Commissioners Centennial Building 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Ms. Harbert, The availability of a regional state-of-the-art solid waste management facility is important to the retention and al:traction of industry to Weld County. At a recent meeting of the Executive Committee of the Greeley/Weld Economic Development Action Partnership (EDAP), we reaffirmed the above statement and endorsed the process of re -permitting the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. We encourage the Weld County Commissioners to favorably consider the re -permitting of the subject facility. Respectfully, Karen Sekich Chairperson Cx1:U LY/W1.1 I) I.(X)NOMI<: ULV4tl)1•A4.Ni r 0, M.. 5 II TO Ab SInrY GeN'Itt. (WIn,M0 004. I j 10 VCCM1d<G$ ILrt KIVtS1•l.l IT, APR 1 '93 14:34 303 352 2436 Pq i i 6 L 04-02-1993 10149AM FROM TO 63530660 P.01 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER 1000 10711 STREET. GREELEY, CCLORADC 80831 C303) 350-9770 April 2, 1993 Weld County Commissioners P.O. Box 758 Greeley, CO 80632 Dear Commissioners: It is my understanding that the Board will be discussing the Central Weld San;tary Landfill on Monday, April 5, 1993. The continued availability of this conveniently located landfill for the disposal of solid waste generated within the City of Greeley is vital to our residents and businesses. I respectfully request you proceed with the process for considering an amended permit as quickly as possible. Concerns of area residents should be heard and considered, however sudden closure or prolonged delay in issuing an amended permit would be harmful tothe economic future of Greeley. If there is any assistance I can provide in this matter, please let me know. Sincerely, oath - Paul M. Grattet City Manager Past -fit" band lax lransm nal memo WI TOTAL P.01 22;1.061 Golder Associates Inc. 200 Union Boulevard. Suite 100 Lakewood, CO USA 80228 Telephone (3031980.0540 Fax (303) 985.2080 October 23, 1992 Waste Services Corporation 6037 77" Avenue Greeley, CO 80634 Attention: Mr. Bill Hedberz Our Ref.: 913-2403 RECEIVED SANITAI:QN o:v:$:CN OCT 26 1992 RE: EXPANDED HYDROGEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION AT THE CENTRAL WELD SANTTARY LANDFILL, COLORADO Dear Bill: Golder Associates Inc. (Golder) is pleased to present the results of the above -referenced project to Waste Services Corporation (WSC). Golder has completed the installation of temporary sampling points (TSPs) and collected groundwater samples for chemical analysis. The following sections provide background information, summarize field activities, and present results of the analysis. 1.0 BACKGROUND Golder recently completed a hydrogeologicai and geotechnical investigation for the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill (CWSL) (see "Hydrogeologic and Geotechnical Characterization for the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill", Golder, 1992). Seven geotechnical borings, three shallow groundwater monitoring wells, seven deep groundwater monitoring wells, and twenty soil gas probes were installed during the field investigation portion of the investigation. The geotechnical borings, monitoring wells, and soil gas probes supplemented five shallow groundwater monitoring wells previously installed at the site. Water quality data were generated from samples collected from groundwater monitoring wells and surface water sampling points. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were detected in four shallow groundwater monitoring wells (GWMW-4, GWMW-5, GWMW-5N and GWMW-7) on the southern (downgradient) side of the landfill and at one surface water sampling point, the outlet of the landfill underdrain (LF-UD). Figure 1 shows the locations of sampling points where VOCs were detected and Table 1 OFFICES IN AUSTRAUA. CANADA. GERMANY, HUNGARY, ITALY, SWEDEN. UNITED KIN GicMM efis oT-c$ October 23. 1992 -2- 913-2403 summarizes the results. It should be noted that VOCs were detected in GWMW-5, located off -site approximately 20 feet south of the site boundary. WSC determined that additional investigative efforts were required to further characterize the quality of shallow groundwater downgradient of the landfill. 2.0 FJEk-A ACTIVITIES Field activities conducted at the CWSL as part of the expanded hydrogeologic investigation included drilling, installation of TSPs and collection of groundwater samples from the TSPs. The field program was initiated on September 21, 1992. The following sections provide a brief description of drilling operations, TSP construction, and groundwater sampling procedures. 2.1 Dhlline Operations Drilling operations were conducted by GEO Environmental (GEO) of Golden, Colorado. GEO utilized a pickap-truck mounted Giddings drill rig for all boreholes except TSP-5. Due to difficult access to the TSP-5 location, this borehole was drilled with a small all terrain vehicle mounted hydraulic hammer rig, utilizing a 1 -inch diameter drill rod. Other boreholes were drilled with 2 -inch diameter solid stem flight augers. Golder field personnel supervised all drilling activities. Boreholes were drilled approximately five feet below the anticipated water table depth, based on previous site -characterization data. Auger refusal was encountered in TSP-7 and TSP-S at depths approximately 10 feet below the anticipated water table depth. No water was encountered at these locations. A summary of final borehole depths, including water levels encountered, is provided in Table 2. All drilling and sampling equipment, including drill rods, samplers, and tools, was steam - cleaned prior to initiation of drilling activities and between boreholes. These cleaning procedures ensured that representative samples were obtained from each TSP. Nine TSPs were installed as part of this investigation (Figure 1) The TSPs were installed near the southern property line to further characterize shallow groundwater on the downgradient side of the landfill. TSP locations are summarized as follows: renpor_,y Sampling Point On --or Off -Ste Approximate Location Sting- Wtimule TSP.t Of( 200' south of OWMV/4 Define extent of VOC migration detected in OWMW-5 TS0.2 On 400' west o(CWMW-5N Characterize groundwater in center of south property boundary Golder Associates 931061 • • October 23, 1992 -3- 913-2403 Teen poracy Sampling Point :'Oa -or O(fSrte Approximate Leta:idea f Sang Rado.sk TSP-3 On 340' wart of TSP-2 CAancarize grourdwateria center of south property boundary TSP-4 On 340' west of TSP-3 Chanctersze groundwater in center of south property boundary TSP-5 Oft Canter of Middle Spomer Lake Dam Characterize groundwater downgndient of landfill anderdnin TSP-6 On 300' southwest of OWMW-6 Characterize groundwater upgradient of landfill underlain TSP-7 Off 225' south of property line, midway between TSP-2 and TSP-3 Characterize groundwater downgndient of the canter of the landfill TSP-$ Off 300' south of property lima, midway between TSP-2 and TSP-4 Characterize groundwater downgradient of the center of the landfill TSP.MW-5 Off 3- south of GWMw-S Compere TSP se pfmg nausa With monitoring well sampling nmlu Approximate TSP locations are provided in Figure 2. Due to the extensive amount of data collected during Golder's 1992 hydrogeologic and geotechnical investigation, it was not necessary to collect soil samples. Accordingly, borehole logs were not prepared for the TSPs. 2.2 Samole Point Installation Procedures The TSPs were installed by GEO in all boreholes drilled as part of this investigation. The GEO Expendable Aquifer Sampling Implant (EAST) was utilized for the TSPs. After the boreholes had been drilled to the desired depth, the EASI points were installed in completed boreholes. The end of the drill rod was fitted with an expendable tip and placed in the boreholes. One end of a 3/8 -inch Teflont"I tube was perforated with 1/16 -inch holes over a 1 -foot interval. The tube was then inserted into the drill rod and attached to the expendable tip. The drill rod was then removed from the borehole, exposing the perforated interval to the formation to allow groundwater to migrate into the tube. The TSPs were completed by pouring 10-20 grit environmental grade silica sand into the borehole while agitating the 3/8 -inch tube to prevent bridging. The sand was placed to a level approximately one foot below ground surface; granular bentonite was then placed from that point to ground surface and hydrated with deionized water. Final completion details differed between on -site and off -site TSPs. On -site TSPs were sealed with Parafilir; Golder Associates 931061 October 23, 1992 913-2403 completed with 1 -inch diameter, 5 -inch long PVC tubes; and, threaded caps were placed to protect the sampling point. Cement pads were constructed around the TSPs to prevent surface water infiltration. Locations were marked with survey stakes. Off -site TSPs were sealed with Parafilm°" and attached to survey stakes. Figure 2 illustrates a typical "EAST" temporary sampling point. All TSP locations were surveyed by Stewart and Associates of Fort Collins, Colorado, on September 25, 1992. Ground surface and bottom of borehole elevations are provided in Table 2. 2.3 Sampl'ng Procedures EAST TSPs are designed to be sampled without development. Groundwater samples were collected from EAST TSPs upon completion; or, in the case of low -yielding points, when sufficient groundwater was present for sample collection. As discussed in Section 2.1, Drilling Operations, auger refusal was encountered at TSP-7 and TSP-8 prior to encountering the water table; no samples were collected from these points. Groundwater samples were collected from the TSPs utilizing a peristaltic pump attached to the 3/8 -inch diameter tube, or alternatively, to a 3/16 -inch diameter tube threaded down the larger tube. The alternative methodology was utilized when water levels were deeper than 20 feet or the water contained a large percentage of silt. In those instances, the peristaltic pump was not capable of creating sufficient vacuum to extract a sample. The 3 -16 -inch tube, unperforated, could be inserted into the larger tube directly to the water level, allowing the pump to extract a sample. Groundwater samples were collected in 20 -milliliter (ml) volatile organic analysis (VOA) vials. The vials were immediately labelled and placed on ice in coolers for preservation. Strict chain -of -custody procedures were followed, and the samples were delivered to Phoenix Analytical Laboratories (Phoenix) for chemical analysis. Copies of chain -of -custody forms are included in the attachments. 'The samples were analyzed using EPA Method 8240 For the following parameters: ► Vinyl Chloride; ► 1, 1-Dichloroethene; ► 1,1-Dichloroethane; ► trans-1,2-Dichloroethene; ▪ cis-1,2-Dichloroethene; ► 1,2-Dichloroethane; ► 1,2-Dichloropropane; Golder Associates 921061. • O October 23, 1992 -5- 913-2403 Trichloroethene; and, ► Tetrachloroethane. The analytes include the six VOCs detected in the downgradient monitoring wells during the initial investigation, with the addition of vinyl chloride, a degradation product of the tchloroethene and tetrachloroethane series (see Table 1). It should be noted that trans-1,2- Dichloroethene and cis-1,2-Dichloroethene results provided by Phoenix have been presented in Table 3 in a combined format as 1,2-Dichloroethene. This presentation format is consistent with the manner in which the initial investigative results were presented (see Golder, 1992). 3.0 RLSITLTS Results of chemical analysis of the groundwater samples are presented in Table 3. Copies of the Phoenix reports are included in the attachments. No target compounds were detected in the TSPs, with the exception of the confirmatory TSP-MW-5. Results indicate that VOC impacts to shallow groundwater on the south side of the landfill are limited to the immediate area of the landfill. A comparison of TSP-MW-5 results with GWMW-5 results is provided in Table 4. It should be noted that GWMW-5 results presented in Table 4 are from the sampling round conducted as a part of the initial hydrogeologic study. The comparison shows that the same compounds were detected in both sample points, although at slightly different concentrations. The slight differences in concentrations between the two sampling rounds could be the result of using different analytical laboratories. Additionally, the TSP drilling and sampling methodology may enhance volatilization of targeted compounds. The comparison indicates that the TSPs are a useful means of obtaining qualitative groundwater quality information for the site. 4.0 CONCLUSIONS Results of the expanded hydrogeologic study, combined with results of the initial investigation, suggest that the occurrence of VOCs in the shallow groundwater is isolated to particular areas. Elevated concentrations of VOCs were detected during the initial investigation in the southeast and southwest corners of the landfill. VOCs were not detected in the center of the south side of the landfill VOCs were also not detected in off -site sampling points, with the exception of the GWMW-5 and TSP-MW-5 locations. The isolated occurrences of VOCs may be the result of different types of waste disposed in these areas. Golder Associates 931061 October 23, 1992 -6- 913-2403 The 1992 initial hydrogeologic investigation concluded that the nearest permitted downgradient groundwater well is approximately 2,000 feet from the landfill. Detection of offsite VOC migration in the shallow groundwater was limited to very low levels in TSP-MW-5 which was located approximately 23 feet south of the site boundary and immediately downgradient of GWMW-5. TSP-1, which was located about 200 feet further south, showed no VOC contamination. Accordingly, no water well users are being impacted by volatile organic compounds originating from the landfill. Any questions concerning the content of this report should be directed to the undersigned. Sincerely, GOLDER ASSOCIATES INC. •- Christopher E. Rife Engineer Technician frzc,ct/- larr- Ward E. Heist, PG, CEM Senior Hydrogeologist CER/WEH/smp Golder Associates TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS DETECTED AT DOWNGRADIENT SAMPLING POINTS ' SAMP JNGs . _ ,. COMPOt1ND CONCENTRATIONS'MN nig/ - , . r' ' POIt a• . x ,:1'1;-DCA- tZ OCA TZ-DCE ... 14,2:-DCP: ,--TCE- :16' • PCE, .^ ' GWMW-4 <0.005 0.018 <0.005 O.005 <0.005 <0.005 GWMW-5 <0.01 <0.01 0.026 <0.01 0.070 0.210 GWMW-5N 0.0054 <0.005 0.017 0.0058 0.050 0.140 GWMW-7 <0.005 0.0061 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 0.0095 LF-UD 0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 0.005 NOTES: (1) Below Detection Limit a BDL (2) 1,1 - DCA - 1,1-Dichloroethane 1,2 - DCA a 1,2-Dichloroethane 1,2 - DCE = 1,2-Dichloroethene 1,2 - DCP - 1,2-Dlchloropropane TCE - Trichloroethene PCE - Tetrachloroethane October 1992 913-2403 Golder Associates 921061 TABLE 2 TEMPORARY SAMPLE POINT (TSP) SURVEY DETAILS �: L`OCATtON O GROUNaSURFACE OI�i (Rj 1 COMPLETION f .-�t7EPiE1°((tj yBOTTO OFBOREHOIE „v.---ELEVATTONY(ftj l.f3`- WATERLLEVEL ELEVATION (ft) TSP-1 4745.29 24' 4721.29 4727.7 TSP-2 4786.54 36' 4750.54 4751.1 TSP-3 4794.89 46' 4748.89 4754.7 TSP-4 4773.26 28' 4745.26 4749.8 TSP-S 4761.63 25' 4736.63 4748.1 TSP-6 4768.35 16' 4752.35 4762.4 TSP-7 4778,94 35' 4743.94 DRY TSP-8 4769.88 31' 4738.88 DRY TSP-MW-5 4753.30 25' 4728.30 4733.3 October 1992 913-2403 Golder Associates °"'106.! f I p • TABLE 3 ANALYTICAL RESULTS • COMPOUND CONCENTRATIONSjIN"(mg/t) AMPt.IE r fi, QOINT.;)a 'VINYL f� tHLORtO T,r-OCE .7;T-OCA ' x 'tz.OCE. rs '.1,Z-DCX ,, _tt.2,CCP ' - ,TCE.. ,, PCE.`.. TSP-1 <0.005 <0,003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 TSP-2 <0.005 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 TSP-3 <0.005 <0,003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0,003 <0.003 TSP-4 <0,005 <0.003 <0,003 <0.003 <0,003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 TSP-5 <0.005 ' <0.003 <0,003 <0,003 <0.003 <0,003 <0.003 <0.003 TSP-6 <0.005 <0,003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 TSP-7 DRY I DRY DRY DRY 0RY DRY DRY DRY TSP-8 DRY I DRY DRY DRY DRY DRY DRY DRY TSP-MW-5 <0.005 I <0.003 <0.003 0.01 <0.003 <0.003 0.001• 0.003 NOTES: • (1) All results presented in milligrams per liter (mgll) (2) All "less than' (<) values are practical quantitation limits (3) • compound was detected outside of the laboratory calibration limits. (4) 1,1—0CE . 1,1-0lchloroethene 1,1-0CA - 1,1-0ichloroethane 1,2—OCE - 1,2-Dicnloroethene 1,2-OCA . 1,2-Dichloroethane 1,2-DCP - 1,2-Dichloropropane TCEYTrichloroethene PCE.Tetrachloroethene (5) Phoenix provided results for trans-1,2-Dichlorethene and cis-1,2-Dichlorethene: these results have been added together to provide 1,2-0ichlorethene results. October 1992 913-2403 Golder Associates M I i VINYL,: ,< CHLORIDE TABLE 4 COMPARISON OF TSP-MW-5 AND GWMW-S RESULTS COMPOUND -CONCENTRATIONS lN:(mgdl). 4.r 2-DCE 1~2-t7CA; g±4bCa iRCE I TSP-MWS GW MM <0.005 <0.02 <0.003 NA <0.003 <0.01 0.01 0.026 <0.003 <0.01 <0.003 <0.01 '0.001 0.07 0.003 0.21 NOTES:.. (1) All results presented in milligrams per liter (mg/I) (2) all"less than' (<) values are practical quantitation limits (3) * compound was detected outside of the laboratory calibration limits (4) 1,1 -ACE. 1,1-Dichloroethene 1,1-DCA - 1,1-Dichloroethane 1,2-DCE .1.2-Dichloroethene 1,2-DCA 1,2-Dichloroethane 1,2-OCP- 1,2-Oichloropropane TCE-Trichloroethene PCE.Tetraehloroetnene (S) Phoenix provided results for trans-1,2-Oichlarehtene and cis-1,2-Dichlorethene: These results have been added together to provide 1,2-Dichlorethene results (6) NA - Compound not analyzed (7) TSP-MW5 sampled 9-25-92, analyzed by Phoenix Analytical Laboratories GWMW5 sampled 3-31-92. analyzed by Enseco/Rocky Mountain Analytical October 1992 913-2403 Golder Associates Q 3 e I I 9 1_ PARAFILM CAP .5 -INCH LONG - 1 -NO! DIAMETER PVC PIPE WITH THREADED CAP CONCRETE PAD BENTONITE SEAL 3/8 -INCH DIAMETER TEFLON TUBING V/20 GRIT ETIVIROAMCVNTAL GRADE SIJCA SAAR 2-NCh' DIAMETER BOREHOLE 3/8 -NCH DIAMETER TEFLON TUBING PERFORATED OVER 1 FOOT NTERVAL WTTH 1/16 -NCH DRILL BIT EXPENDABLE PONT e'Golder Associates Denver, C0br.d0 TYPICAL "EAST" TSP CONSTRUCTION DETAILS cucst/nroeccr WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL ONA M ROT. "`" ROT ac4&C WEH 1JA� ocr v492 1rISCxE�"� lni. so 14" .w. 9134403 we zr FPO Q_#.0s - ., - cat :7 s ?.AW PROJECT NO. Y. ',SIGNATURE/ 4,� !DA ° 1SIGNATC%E: RE• 9Ciftex eft ff // _...._.._... nt name a`b'o a ,..9.�, f7J RyC. BY: _ - - D= =^-t --P:.-- ETI:lE .;LINO. 9 f[%�/�v��._.__..—..;`1/�3rRELINQ. BY: abov 9 / name above • --- DATE'T:M -- h grin; name above' !SIGNATURE / DATEbTIME ;SIGNATURE: DAT '^I "w' REC . BY: Intl name above bilebidaieci 7 `411-2--1-&44.4 IREC. By: i i Pr... name above,,- - SrGNATURE I ATe TIME SIGNATURE- DgTq1T"vs --f r - r REvny_ J •J JUL. j 1t u1 . : u r T'N: TA'.S 6_4 e-2 /4--s o c ?ROJ?CT Y.A::ACER iw ? ADDRESS CLIENT PROJECT NAME PROJECT t ; - ?/c/ (c...:-..-71; Lcc.- Sill • . i NO . ..1It •?4 3 ' .. - - i OF ' SA.MPLERS : PRINT MAME S `CMAT!JRE i COM- • SAMPLE DATE 2 TI E DESCP.:?T:ON SAMPLE TASt' 9• ,y .___.. z '_ 3 Y z r• i a " 1771 4. S i. J z j_ _ F 1 2 b a r i_,•J; ''e i R f i ____ 1 _-I--_L- -t f r 1 s i i —f i i ; i ; _�—I a w 1 i z, z 9 name above- rDA:aiier:I :RELINQ. BY: p. - --- AJ print 1ES0se above SIGNATURE' EXPECTED TURNARCN• N: \ E:S:+ECTED OCZ DATA nr~ /¢r h4 /My, ANArYS:S RE:WES:ED A/ / / / / ! 0/ / / / / / ti) / / / / / / / / / / / / / ;I l / / / / / / / /, ? -MA2Z5 '. 'i.) !h}i'RELINQ. BY: grint ATEjTIMM SIGNATURE: FT: COC J 3401 INDUSTRIAL LANE 9ROOM_IELD, COLORADO 30020 ?AGE / 0? L,_ 303/469-1101 931.IJV i Uj sl U U CLIENT ADTR SS - •• -,• . ./ r. ink - ♦. p J - .�PncJ_cT NO. r (_7“, c. J (.•Z n PROZeCT MANAGER /-. •: ,.AFL i e' :2.nCTED BAT _ CLIENT PROJECT NAME ..A. PROJECT * (41, ,fir,: 1..a,, c•-" r - S 1.973.-_za_f,_3_;___. ___-_-____ .. or `,SAMPLERS: PRINT NAME S=GNATvRE. CON- 'iTAINERE SAMPLE DA:= . -", DESCR—?TISN ,SA::PLE TA ' 9/2-1/202/4%..C ANALYSIS REQr zST_D. / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / �/ / / / / / '5-1 / / / At, /- / / / / / / ;,•t: / / / / / �. . • Y• ✓ --� --, k /, i 11• i i 'f -1 i __l._. _! r S ' i { —i i i i i L_ e — - .: , - t i i a ; ! r i i IIJ i ; 4_ s : ; II ' Ill'RELINQ. BY: 2/a./ r J f 14rLIYQ. BY: ant nave aSeve'/tss.'_' •- __—print nave above 1' � SIGNATVRE> L. 2,L jDATE,T?ME jSIG.n'ATBRR: )DATC;T7V7) I�REC. BY: . I'i �'4 F4,•v REC. BY: i .! ----p: int name above �SYGNATII?3: 'DATE TIME SIGNATURE: • ?DAT T •,E', RELYNQ. BY: i 111:LINQ..BY: _ ...-__--_—print name above ----------- print name above f • d 1 d i t i FS'GNATIIRE' 'DAT,'TIME 'SIGNATURE: pT T_ y' _ .• __• _•_ _ D REC. BY: RRC 9Y: I print name above------ J. - ' GNATURr::DATEz —�__-- •Kea C//a., Jr y,G ..• , RvS / t Lvi.�. 8 �. "G�sn i �,.,.....c r..o J�J ri..t :�y ,„ _�.� .-__.. _�.��... zGO , acne 2N_T_ALS: Q / ;k 44_ REHA IIPT : COC ?AGE 340: INDUSTRIAL LAMB a BRO0MFIELD, coLCRA]c 20020 • 202/459-::0: ("106' o: : _ _ a 3 C A" 1 P.A..— PROJECT NO. et CLIENT (C3721-..4.16-.72 ,4J 04 . ADDRESS 91.3-0-05-10 r • • - /• I PRC:;CT MANAGER A -''4'.J Pere-Cr ES?ECT_D TERNA.Rc••�I _V_r V. J___:3/./5 EXPECTED DUE DATE �/>•,.�.; ' CLIENT PROJECT NAME ANALYSES REQUESTED: 'PROJECT # i --�-_._...--•--------..... r V 'SAMPLERS: PRINT RAMS SIGNATURE CON- �G�/ i / / / / / /�,P1n�7 Ca Z�/'t*s Ti:?A_ -S' /0// / / / / / f �v / / / / / i / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / arm zs A p I SAMPLE DATE TI�'iE 'DESCRIPTION '' SAMPLE t•C; / 'DESCRIPTION _ _qVk ;.9/70zPkr _TSP 4.-GGJ ✓ W2.0;;/..4../7?rsP G -6 w ? _� y ✓ z • r t r i rS, , f r t. d i r _._-... ' 't_ J( t -Y dam_-.��„��. �..._ r 'RELINQ. BY // Cif i 1RELINQ. BY i v ; — rin ,.. above Jf / fZ'-mac'- i-----------print name above' _ !SIGNATURE: /,/A4 .-C,c_zo-iJDATE�TI. SIGNATURE; SDAS.rS,_, 1 int. BY: ! ��/ �i' t I{��ShP//c /c�f� � , REC. BY: ; , i ---•------=- riot name above' � . t 7 _ • - ...--P-»n. name above r 1 u S I GNAfl7RE�i �'4 �y ? DATA' ^'I:!... j S - cNA VR"• ? DA_"o -c•r, iRELINQ. BY l�ir/rpcQ ,r - eeez R LINQ. BY: ------ print name above--,_. -print name aoove' !SIGNATURE: 4DATE-TIME :SIGNATURE: DAT�'TT:F�' t -- — -- l ..a L ...� REC. BY: i 4REC. BY: -..__� __) ______-:---print name above , .-- - _ ? --print name above }- SIGNATURE: DATE TIY.E ySIGNATURE: hD10Tah • t RE .ARYS A ilee 6//e4A grP,.J 6.(-02; _-a.4. f - ----- — - f F CO r • t t C / PAGE ___2_ OF L_ r 3401 INDUSTRIAL LANE 3R00xFIELD, COLORADO 80020 303/469-::0: SI 21,06l ti • N - 0 € CLI,:rr `� r, c- b•c.2 /art ADDRESS PCLITNT \ ,PROJECT N MS AaALYS=5 3?QJES_ED jPROJECT * 7/ N0. / / i.. _ / .../ N `j23.2da _IC_ / G/p/c•i Ce,,t �y Ga+cJC/i Og / / / / / ,ivSAMPLERS: PRINT NAME SIGNATURa ' coy -ea -a.— *8\ti+ / / / / / / / / / / • _'z3,. \/ / / / / / 4'- 7c r Ai _ ./1-e,;._ . � ._, . _ ._ "- V ' / / / / / SAMPLE DATE • . ,>1 / / / / / 'DESCRIPT:C:i 'S.L`:PLE rAc (:, / / / m.n V J a. P.A.- PROJECT NC. ?RC:EC_ M.A.;AGCR (/)/y2. ) !:/E/Z ES?ECTED .401 r r _n_CT?D D::.. DATE IRELINQ. BY: y --IT n� Ov j1 C,/kj3 7iRf.LINQ- BY: $ d e 4 ei.5 v �� —print name above •------ - o• SIGNATUREd //CIDATE TIME SIGNATURE: - 'DATE;TIM' REC. L �l�J _ j R.C. BY: �,(��l 'c 1 1 f1+'�I.�f�CIP.'C. BY: i e : P '' IIn ire t -----------i- —nrin: name above (SIGNATURE: _ :1 t aDATE :TIME 'S:GNA:•A.RE• _ `. DA - --_ m - -� „- RELINQ. HY: i 1 PELINQ. By_ ; c ._-_. print name above`-_.-._ _,.' _--- -- -- -.--- -- -print name above`• IS:GNATURE: !DATE.r:;SIGNATURr. REC. BY: ' REC. 3Y: print name above:— �--... ---_—print name above` SIGNATURE: 'DATE ITIME +SIGNATURr: DATE'^*KEt r i T ratt 9k47/2 63.5 .05,7LP JZR•J- `r ref —TSP- 5— GA '73ft,v -S i { - - — ' ? — — - _'—T— t IR Z i j 5 4 —T . + r / t ; - 1 —�, i i # -_--i _7 f a t ; i_t______F___; di I -- —� ---;____I J_J LY a - �g p- ! f / - RSMARES : • INITIALS 3402 INDUSTRIAL LANE 41. BROOMFIELD, COLORADO 8002C • 303/464-2201 • • 931:061,1. ti -7 .1715%.hie viW3[P.-ww.y��{: M✓Y..��.i'�'C �'Yi Mt4Wyv-�,y�l.• .�.. ..:;Zl�'{"j�,�.;it,2lif' t Y .. ta + �,!R1SiK PHOENIN ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES REPORTS . `r. $'ig l • VOLATILE ORGANICS AllkSIS DATA SHEET Clint Sample ID: TSP-1 -GA Lab Nan: p)CENIX ANALYTICAL LABS INC Contract: 923-2413/01 4478 Matrix: (soil/water) MATER Lab Sample ID: S A 1917 Sample: (wt/vol) 11,1 Lab File ID: 478A6514 Level: (low/red) LW Date Sampled: 89/''.1/42 % Moisture: N/A Date Received: 19/21/92 Column: (pack/cap) CDWXCOU Date Analyzed: 89/21/92 Dilution Factor: 8.5 CAS NO. CD POMO ^G (ug/1) p2. (w,/1) CIY4. 1S 75-81-4 Vinyl Chloride 75-35-4 i, l Dichloroethene 75-34-3 1,1 -Oicnlonethane 156-54-2 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1:6-68-5 cis -1, 2-Oichloroethene 187-16-2 1,2-Oichloroethane 7911-5 TrichIoroethene 127-18-4 Tetrachloroethene 5U 3U U 3U 3U 3U 3U 3U CU LIMITS(%) Fax SURROGATE RECOVERIES: Dibroeofluorouthane 76-114 96 % Toluene -d8 88 -lit 34 % 1,4-8ronfluorobenzene 86-115 16 % (a1W.IFIEtS: 'U' Indicates that compound was studied for and not detected. 'I' Indicates that coepaund was found outside of ow calibration limits. '8' Indicates that compound was found in the blank. The value seen has been corrected. n 0 2 924'1.061. OCUTILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA 9EET Client Sample ID: TSlit-2-Gli Lab Mame: ANOENIX ANALYTICAL LABS DC Contract: 923.2403/60(1 4478A Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID: 8QA 33968 Sample: (wt/vol) Mel Lab File ID: 478(4555 Level: (low/red) LOW Date Sampled: 09/22/92 % Moisture: N/A Date Received: 09/2;'/92 Column: (pack/cap) CB,(VOCDL) Date Analyzed: 09/23/92 Dilution Factor: 0.5 CAS NO. COIPOLVID cANC. (ug/11 POL (ug/I) QUALIFIER 7S -01—i 75-Z-4 75-34-3 15G-59-2 1:6-o0-5 107-06-2 79-01-6 127-18-4 Vinyl Chloride 1,1-Oichloroethene 1,1-Dichloroethane trans-1,2-Dichloraethene cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 1,2-Dichloroet one Trichlaroethene Tetrachloroethene 3U 3U 3U 3U 3U 3U 3U 3U 0.2 LIMITS(%) KW 9JRk06ATE RECOVERIES: Dibromofluororethane 76-114 76 % Toluene -d8 88-110 96 % 1,4-Droaofluorobnzene 86-113 94 % OULIFIERS: 'U' Indicates that compound was searched for and not detected. 'J' Indicates that compound was fatal outside of our calibration Baits. 'B' Indicates that compound was found in the blank. The valor seen has been corrected. 002 VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Client Sample ID: TSA-3 U Lab Nan: PHOENIX ANNLYTICA. LABS I1C Contract: 923-24i3/GOR 447AA Matrix: (soil/water) 4ATEi Lab Sample ID: GOA 33978 Sample: (wt/vol) IOC Lab File ID: 478AM6 Level: (low/eed) LON Date Sampled: 09/22/92 t Moisture: N/R Date Received: 09/2/92 Column: (pack/cap) CAP(VOCOLI Date Analyzed: 09/23/92 Dilution Factor. 8.5 ' CAS NO. CCMPOUIR) DC. (uR/1) POOL Aug/1) QUALIFIER 73-01-4 Vinyl Chloride 75-3S-4 1,1-0ichlo roethene 75-34-3 1,1-Dichloroethane 156-59-2 trans-I,2-Dlchloroethene 156-60-5 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 107-66-2 1,2-Dichloroethane 79-01-6 Trichloroethtne 127-18-4 Tetrachlomethene SU 3U 3U 3U 3U 3U 3U IU UP LD(TTS(%) FOND SURROGATE RECOVERIES: Dibromofluoronethane 76-114 186 S Tolutne-d8 88-110 92 1,4-Rromofloorabmnzene 86-115 180 S QUALIFIERS: 'U' Indicates that compound was seated for and not detected. '3• Indicates that compound was found outside of our calibration limits. 'S' Indicates that compound was found in the blank. • 007 The value seen has been corrected. 1O6 VQJITILE ORGANICS iSIS DATA GREET Client Sample I1�-i-6H Lab Na,: Picea PIA.YTICAI LABS OC Contract: 9234113/EGA 44783 Matrix: (soil/water) BATS Lab Smolt ID: GOA 34081 Sample: (wt/vol) 1011 Lab File ID: 478116579 Level: (law/led) OA Date Saspled: 19/23/92 :t Moisture: N/A Date Received: 19/24/92 Column: (pack/tap) CAp(VOCDL) Date Analyzed: 09/24/i2 Dilution Factor: 0.5 I I N ro I I N I I I I I I I CAS NO. CG^CQd0) OX. lug/1) PQL lug/1) 0.p !FIER 75 -et -4 75-35-4 75-34-3 156-54-2 156-60-5 10736-2 79-913 127-18-4 Vinyl Chloride 1,1-Dichloroethene 1,1 -Dicbloroethane trans-1,2-Dichloroethene cis-1,2-Dichloroetnene 1,2-Dichioroethann Trichloroethene Tetrachloroetbene 5U 3U 3U 3U 3U 3U 3U 3U 0.9 UMITSt%) FOUND SURROGATE RECOVERIES: Dibroeoflaoramethane 76-114 t19 f Toluene -d8 88-110 1116 : 1, 4-Brosoflaonbenxene 86-115 98 QUALIFIERS: 'U' Indicates that compound was searched for and not detected. • 1. Indicates that compound was found outside of our calibration limits. ' 8' Indicates that compound was found in the blank. The value seen has been corrected. V ti 93.10,61. VOLATILE ORGANICS iiihrSIS DATA 9CT Client Sample Lab Name: AH3CNII ANALYTICAL LABS INC Contract: 323-2403/CCA 44780 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER is Sample ID: 80A 34081 Sample: (wt/yo11 10,1 lab File ID: 47846580 Level: (low/med) LON Date Sampled: 09/Z3/4Z % Moisture: N/A Date Received: e91Z4n2 Column: (pack/cap) CAP(VOC➢L) Date Analyzed: 09/29/92 Dilution factor. 0.5 CAS N0. 11cU2I) COLIC. (mg/1) p . Coo/1) QUALIFIER 75ti9t-4 75-s"5-4 75-34-3 156-39-2 156-60-5 107-06-2 79-01-6 127-18-4 Vinyl Chloride 1,1-Dithlortethene 1,1 -Dichlorotthane tram -1,2-Dichloreethene cis-1,Z-Oichloraethene 1,2-Dichloroethane Trithlernethene Tetrachloroethene • 'J 3U 3 'J 3U 3U 3U 3U 3U CLP LA(1T5(S) FOUND SURREATE RECOVERIES: Dibrowfluorasethane 76-114 94 % Toluene -d8 88-110 88 % 1,4-8raeofluorobenzene 86-115 88 % QUALIFIERS: 'U' Indicates that cospound ws.seard:eel for and not detected. '3' Indicates that compound was food outside of of calibration limits. '0' Indicates that cn,peund was found in the blank. The value seen has been corrected. nn', VOLATILE ORGANICS IRySIS DATA SLEET Client Sample ID- TSP-5-(14 Lab Name: Matrix: (soil/water) Sample: (wt/vol) Level: (low/med) % Moisture: Column: (pack/cap) CRS NO. ;MINIX Plal-TTICAL LABS INC IRTER 16.1 LOA N/A CAP(VOCOL) CORM Contract: 923-2403/GOA M78C Lab Sample ID: GOA 34299 Lab File ID: 478A6636 Date Sampled: 09/25/92 Date Received: 89/23/92 Date Analyzed: 89/27/92 Dilution Factor: 0.5 CCtC. (ug/1) PO. (ugh) 2UA1.IFIER 75-21-4 75-35-4 75-34-3 156-59-2 t5648-5 187-06-2 79-014 127-18-4 SURROGATE RECOVERIES: DIWLIFIER5: Vinyl Chloride 1,1 —Dichloroethene 1,1-0ichloreethane trans-1,2—Dichloroethene cis-1,2—Dichloroethene 1,2—Oichloroethane Trichloroethene Tetrachloroethene 511 3U 3U 3U 3U 311 3U 311 C.p LIMITS(%) FD1D2D Dibromofluoroeethane 76-114 90 % Toluene -d8 88-118 144 % 1,4-Bramoflaarobenxene 86-115 118 % ▪ Indicates that compound was searched for and not detected. ' J' Indicates that compound was found outside of our calibration limits. ' 8' Indicates that compound was found in the blank. The value seen has been corrected. 002 aW1.06a IN VOLATILE MANIC;' IS DATA SHEET Client Sample ID: S SLab Mast: DICENI2 ANALYTICAL LABS INC Contract: 923-244/6TY1 44780 Matrix: (soil/water) HATE( Lab Sasole It: 60A 34211 Ill Sample: lwt/voll 10.1 lab File ID: 478A6637 Level: (law/sell L0U Date Sampled: 09/292 % Moisture: N/A Date Received: 09/23/92 I Colan: (pack/cap) CAp(VI:CCU Date Analystd: 84/27/92 Dilution Factor: 0.5 IICAS NO. COt00(dA CONC. (01/1) AIL (uq/i) mom S 75-01" Vinyl Chloride S U 75"35-41,1-0iChloroethene 3 U 75-34-3 1,1 -01chloroethane 3 U li 1'&--S9-2 trans -1,3-Oic loroethene 3 U 156-00-5 cis-1,2-0ichloroethene 10 3 107-06•-2 1,2-Dichloroethane 3 U 79-41-6 Trichloroethene 1 3 J Ill127-18-4 Tetrachloroethene 3 3 I 1 M I M w K wLDI175(%) 76-114 F0LKS<lR TE RECOVERIES: Dibrpmofluorosethane 76 % Toluene-da 88-1i0 tie % N 1,4-8ronofluorobenzne 86-115 100 % ZY Indicates that compound was searched for and not detected. '3' Indicates that cospound was found outside of our calibration Knits. B' Indicates that coepoud was found in the blank. The valor seen has been corrected. 007 3:1.064_.. DATE SAMPLED: DATE RECEIVED: DATE ANALYZED: DATE REPORTED: CLIENT: ANALYSIS: CLIENT PROJECT: P.A.L. PROJECT: CLIENT SAMPLE P.A.L. NUMBER NUMBER r 1O1 1 {Y., r-nna SUMMARY ANALYTICAL REPORT 09/25/92 09/25/92 09/27/92 09/28/92 Golder Aaeociatee VOA by EPA 8240/Cap- 923-2403 GOA 4478C CONCENTRATION UNITS: COMPOUND • U�.1 GL 7G 1� l I 1 PHOENIX LAS LAC ug/1 (Water) CONC. QUALIFIER TSP-5-GW GOA 34209 TSP-MW-5 No target compounds detected. GOA 34211 cis-1.2-D1chloroethene Trichloroethene Tetrachloroethene APPROVED 97:L tat 10 3. 3 3 god"' t6,,.r. c Aft 3401 industrial lane • brooznfield, coiorado 80020 • 303/469-1101 o^r a 3234693130 PHOENIX ANALYTICAL F-761 T-293 P-004 OCT 21 '32 14:57 • SUMMARY ANALYTICAL REPORT - ADDENDUM DATE SAMPLED: 09/21/92, 09/22/92, 09/23/92, 09/25/92 DATE RECEIVED: 09/21/92. 09/22/92, 09/29/92, 09/25/92 DATE ANALYZED: 09/21/92, 09/23/92, 09/24/92, 09/27/92 DATE REPORTED: 10/09/92 CLIENT: GOLDER ASSOCIATES ANALYSIS: VOA BY EPA 8240/CAP CLIENT PROJECT:923-2483 P.A.L. PROJECT:GOA 4478C CLIENT SAMPLE P.A.L. NUMBER NUMBER CONCENTRATION UNITS: ::G/L COMPOUND CONC. QUALIFIER TSP-1-GW TSP-2-GW TSP-3-OW TSP-3-GW TSP-4-GW TSP-6-GW TSP-S-GW TSP-MW-3 GOA 33917 GOA 33968 GOA 33970 GOA 33970 GOA 34081 GOA 34083 GOA 34209 GOA 34211 1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE 1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE 1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE 1,2-DICHLOROPROPAHE 1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 THIS ADDENDUM WAS PREPARED BECAUSE THE ANALYTE WAS NOT REQUESTED FOR THE ORIGINAL REPORT. THIS TARGET WAS SEARCHED FOR, AND WAS A PART OF THE DAILY CALIBRATION STANDARD. IT WAS HOT PRESENT IX ANY OF THE SAMPLES. REPORTED BY: APPROVED /4Y , 3401 industrial lane • broomfield, colorado 80020 • 303/44,11Q1 \A'astc Management of North America, in':. Mountain Pegicn 5530 G•ea•-•focr: Plaza Blvd. • Ennlnwcod. ;;o;or::do 3C111 Sui 424.503/ 70-3224 October 5, 1992 Ms. Austin Buckingham Colorado Department of Health Hazardous Materials and Waste Management Division HMWMD-SWIM-B2 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South Denver CO 80222-1530 RE: CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL CONFIRMATION GROUNDWATER SAMPLING 104/42: Dear Ms. Buckingham: Enclosed for your review is the final report and summary letter from SEC/Donohue dated September 10, 1992, for the confirmation sampling event performed at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill (CWSL). This sampling event included the Spomer pond that receives discharge from the landfill underdrain. This pond was not previously included in the sampling event performed as part of the CWSL Hydrogeologic investigation. Please contact Bill Hedberg at 1-330-2641 or Alan Scheere at 770- 3324 if you have any questions about the report. Sincerely, V. Bill Hedberg Alan Scheere Division V.P. Landfill Operations Environmental Specialist AS\mmp Enclosure cc: John Pickle, Weld County Health Department w/enc Sara Broadbent, Western Region wp5I W\buckai/ha.924 P: CWSL9,1 • A. SEC EDONOHUE September 10, 1992 Lori Tagawa Waste Management of Colorado, Inc. 5660 Greenwood Plaza Blvd. Suite 400 Englewood, CO 80111 RE: CENTRAL WELD COUNTY SANITARY LANDFILL CONFORMATION GROUNDWATER SAMPLING Dear Lori, Enclosed for your review is the final report for the July, 1992 conformation sampling event performed at the Central Weld County Sanitary Landfill as part of the hydro-geo investigation. Sampling was conducted on July 15, 16, 17, 20 and 21, 1992 and the analysis was performed by the Waste Management, Inc. Environmental -Monitoring Laboratory (EML). ;L:The results presented in the EML .escort nfniii theoriginal results reported by Enseco-Rocky Mountain Analytical in support of the hydro-geo investigation. Virtually all volatile compounds detected during the original sampling and Enseco analysis were confirmed and reported by the/ EML analysis. f Compounds that 'were not confirmed by EVIL include acetone in GWMW02 which was detected just over the reporting by Enseco. EML reported no volatile compounds in GWMW02 indicating that the original value is most likely a laboratory or field contaminant. ,EML did not report methylene chloride in GWMW07, again indicating that the Enseco value' may be from a laboratory source. I The Enseco data reports the compound 1,2-dichloroethene as "total" and reported a detection of this compound in wells GWMW0S and GWMW5N. EML reports only the "trans" isomer and this was not detected in GWMW05 or GWMW5N indicating that the "total" values in the Ens= report are likely attributable to the "cis" isomer. Tn addition to confirming the compounds detected in the original analysis, the EML data, which ! generally had lower reporting limits for the volatile compounds reported additional compounds ati-a level that was below the Enseco rein limit! These compounds .. / repo g Mai/der-1:n dichlorethane,tetrachioroethene and trichloroethene in GWMW04, 1,2-dichloropropane and 1,1 dichloroethanein GWMW05,1,1-dichloroethane, (trans)1,2-dichloroethene, trichloroethene, and vinyl chloride in GWMW07, carbon sulfide in GWMW10 and trichloronrethane in the Under Dram. 931061 Ms. Tagawa September 10, 1992 Page 2 a Enseco did not analyze for the compound'dichloioflnordmethaaeacid EMCi ornd this in wells _GWMW0CGWMW05, GWMWSN and GW2rIW0land the Under,Dpi). Enseco also did "not analyze for the compound fr chloxofluoromethane aend EMi reportedthis in well_GWMWOZ the Under Drun. fA table comparing volatile compounds detected during the Enseco and SAL analyses is included. During the EML analysis the compounds bromodichlommethane and chloroform were detected in field blank 01 and chloroform was detected in field blank 02. This was most likely present in the deionized water that was used as opposed to appearing from a field source. These compounds were not detected in any of the wells and the deionized water appears to have had no adverse affects on the data. Trihalomethancs (THMs) can be found in drinking water supplies as a byproduct of the treatment prrrres. There appeared to be no significate changes in the metals or other inorganic results between the Enseco-RMAL and EML reports. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions . regarding this event. Sincerely, Environmental Scientist RT/rt cc: Bruce Clabaugh, WMC w/enc. 931061 DETECTED VOLATILE COMPOUNDS (original RIVILA and confirming EML analyses) WCll Compound GWMW02 Acetone GWMW04 1,2-Dichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroeh�anc Dichlorofluoromethane Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene GWMW05 Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene 1,2-Dichloroethene 1,1-Dichloroethane 1,2-Dichloropropane Dichlorofluoromethane GWMW5N Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene 1,2-Dichloroethene 1,1-Dichloroethane 1,2-Dichloropropane Dichlorofluoromethane Level-EML ND @25 ug/L 5 `187 :.2307 -86' ND (trans) @6 [foJ err ""580 190 ND (tans) @12 17 16 GWMW07 Tetrachloroethene L3,8� Trichloroethene "S5 I,2-Dichloroethene S9 ( s) 1,1-Dichloroethane -16 , 1,2-Dichloroethane Dichlorofluoromethane 118 r Trichlorofluoromethane Vinyl Chloride Methylene chloride -ND @3 GWMW10 Carbon disulfide "'3 LEUD Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene ,1,1-Dichloroethane Dichlorofluoromethane Trichlorofluoromethane d31 -- (NA = Not analyzed, ND = Not detected) Level-RMA 34 ug/L 18 ND @5 NA ND @5 ND @5 210 70 26 (total) ND @10 ND @10 NA 140 50 17 (total) 5.4 5.8 NA 9.5 ND @5 ND (total) @5 ND @5 6.1 NA NA ND @10 10 ND @5 5 ND @5 5.4 NA NA f 931061 WMI Environmental Monitoring Laboratories, Inc. 2100 Cleanwater Drive Geneva, Illinois 60134 708/208.3100 A Waste Management Company Enclosed are the analytical results for samples received from your facility. The results in the Client Report are for a . single ENS (Event Notification System) number only. The sampling event at your facility may include multiple ENS numbers. A separate Client Report will be generated for each one. It is the goal of WMI Environmental ,Monitoring Laboratories, Inc. to provide analytical data in a timely fashion, formatted 'in a way that our clients will find most useful. If you have any questions concerning the form or content of this report, please contact the WMI ;sc. Customer Operations Department: Main Number (708) 208-3100 FAX Number (708) 208-1175 Note: Two designations may appear in the results column of your Client Report: NA or ND. The designation NA (for "Not Analyzed") is used to identify analytes which were requested in the monitoring program, but for which no suitable testing methodology exists. NA may also indicate a dry well, broken sample bottle, insufficient sample volume, or other condition which precludes analysis for a sample. The designation ND (for "Not Detected") is used to indicate that the analyte of interest was not found at or above the concentration listed under the EMLRL (E!C, Reporting Limit) heading. Unless otherwise indicated, all analytes meet the requirements of holding time as specified in the method. ra,A, Bruce Warden Assistant Director Laboratory Operations Pr Mans Qualit 931061 T e NN: NQ: NS: Data Qualifier Comment Code Definitions Acid surrogate recoveries did not meet the acceptance criteria of the method. Oxidation degradation due to sample matrix was confirmed. BB: Broken bottle. BL: The method blank concentration associated with this analyte did not meet the acceptance criteria of the method. CS: The concentration of this compound exceeded the calibration used for this analysis. The concentration reported is estimated. CU: Co -elution with another compound interferes with the quantitation of this compound. The concentration reported is estimated. DL: The sample was diluted during analysis. Reporting limits have been adjusted where necessary. DP: This -ample was analyzed in duplicate. The relative percent difference between the two results did not meet the acceptance • criteria of the method. OW; Dry well HS: The headspace in this sample bottle exceeded 6 millimeters. IS: The internal standard recoveries associated with this analysis did not meet the acceptance criteria of the method. IV: The bottle did not contain enough sample to perform the analysis. MP: 3-methylhphenol and 4methyiphenol co -elute under the analytical conditions of the method, and can not be differentiated solely on the basis of their mass spectra. The concentrations reported may be either or both isomers. MX: This sample was used as a matrix spike. The percent recovery did not meet the acceptance criteria of the method. The analysis of a quality control standard showed the analytical system was in. control. The result reported may therefore be affected by matrix interferences. N-nitrosodiphenylamine can not be distinguished from diphenylamine using gas chromatography. The concentrations reported may be either or both compounds. No standard qualifier code is in use for this qualification. See the associated comment. There was not enough sample to repeat this analysis. 931061 PL: This result may be a product of contamination from phthalate plasticizers, which are a common lab contaminant. PS: This sample required preservation in the field to a pH of less than 2. The pH was checked after receipt at the lab, and did not have a pH of less than 2. PY: This sample required preservation in the field to a pH of 4 to 5. The pH was checked after receipt at the lab, and did not have a pH of 4 to 5. PZ: This sample required preservation in the field to a pH of 12 or greater. The pH was checked after receipt at the lab, and did not have a pH of 12 or greater. QS: This sample was used as a matrix spike. The percent recovery did not meet the acceptance criteria of the method. The analysis of a quality control standard showed the analytical system was out -of -control. The analytical result for this parameter in the unspiked sample is suspect and may not be reported for regulatory compliance purposes. RA: Acid surrogate recoveries associated with this analysis did not meet the acceptance criteria of the method. RB: Base/neutral surrogate recoveries associated with this analysis did not meet the acceptance criteria of the method. SB: The analysis of this sample was performed by an approved subcontract laboratory. ST: This compound is not stable in acidic water. SU: The analysis of the surrogate with this sample did not meet the acceptance criteria of the method. TS: The analysis for this parameter was conducted after the holding time specified in the method. UN: This compound is not stable under the conditions of the analysis. 931061 Page; 1 e C ENV ROM4.NTAL MONITORING LABORATORIES, INC Site: 488 — Central Weld County Sanitary Landfill Weld County Road 271/2 Miliken CO 80543 CLIE Sample Sample Sample NT REPORT Point: LFUD ENS: 92-11934 Type: RIV/STREAM MP: 488921 Number: AF2942 REV: 00 Sampled: 16-JUL-1992 Received: 17-JUL-1992 Reported: 1-SEP-1992 Anelyts Result DC. AL Units Comments Method FIELD DATA: PH FIELD 7.07 PH UNITS FDPHQUADOI PH FIELD 7.00 PH UNITS FDPHQUADO1 PR FIELD 7.05 PH UNITS FDPHQUADOI PH FIELD 7.02 PH UNITS FDPHQOADO1 SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD 3760. ONHOS/CM FDSPCONDO4 SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD 3750. UNHOS/CM FDSPCONDO4 SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD 3740. WIXOS/CM FDSPCONDO4 SPECIFIC CONDOCTANCE FIELD 3750. Ul0(OS/04 FDSPCONDO4 WATER TEMPERATURE IN DEGREES CELSIUS 17.2 DECREES C FDXTEMPC01 CHEMICAL METBOOS L ROBOTICS: ALXALINITY,BICARBONATE 530 10.000 MG/L CRALKBIC01 ALKALINITY,CARBONATE ND 10.000 MG/L NQ CRALKC0301 CHLORIDE 42.1 0.500 MG/L CRCHLORIO1 NITROGEN, AMMONIA 0.039 0.020 MG/L CRN2NH3X01 NITROGEN, NITRATE 2.80 0.100 MG/L DL' CRNO3HYD01 SULFATE INORGANICS: 1910 5.000 MG/L CRSULFATO1 c ARSENIC -TOTAL ND 10.000 OC/L INCFAATOAS BARIUM -TOTAL ND 200.000 UG/L INICPTOTBA CADMIUM -TOTAL ND 5.000 00/L INICPTOTCD CALCIUM -TOTAL 485000 5000.000 OWL INICPTOTAA CHROMIUM -TOTAL ND 10.000 UG/L INICPTOTCR IRON -TOTAL 250 100.000 OG/L INICPTOTME LEAD -TOTAL ND 25.000 OG/L DL INGFAATOPB MAGNESIUM -TOTAL 291000 7250.000 UG/L DL INICPTOTMG MANGANESE -TOTAL 1750 15.000 UG/L INICPTOTMN MERCURY -TOTAL ND 0.200 OG/L INCVAATOHG POTASSIUM -TOTAL ND 5000.000 OC/L INFAATOTXH SELENIUM -TOTAL ND ' 25.000 OG/L DL INGFAATOSE SILVER -TOTAL ND 25.000 UG/L INICPTOTAG SODIUM -TOTAL 235000 5000.000 UG/L INICPTOTNA SUB -CONTRACT DATA: GROSS ALPHA 63.6 0.100 PCl/L +/- SBALPHBETA GROSS BETA 52.4 0.100 PCl/L +/- SBALPHBETA RADIUM 226 ND 0.100 PCI/L r/- SB SBRA226228 RADIUM 226 -STANDARD DEVIATION 1.1 PCI/L +/- SB SBRA226228 RADIUM 228 ND 0.100 PCl/L +/- ss SBRA226228 RADIUM 228 -STANDARD DEVIATION• R4.5 PCl/L +/- 5B SBRA226228 STANDARD DEVIATION -GROSS ALPHA 33.6 PCl/L +/- SBALPHBETA STANDARD DEVIATION -GROSS BETA 34.2 PCl/L +/- - SBALPHBETA SEMI -VOLATILE ORGANICS 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOXYACETIC ACID ND - 1.000 OC/L SVGC2HRBO1 2-(2,4.5-TRICHLOROPNENOXY)PROPIONIC ACID ND 1.000 0G/L SVGC2HRB01 ENDRIN ND 0.100 UG/L SVGCIOCP01 LINDANE (GAMMA-BHC) ND 0.050 OG/L SVGCIOCP01 METHOXYCHLOR ND 0.500 UG/L SVGC10CP01 TOXAPHENE ND 1.000 OC/L SVGC10CP01 VOLATILE ORGANICS: 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE ND 2.000 UG/L VOMSAAX424 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ND 2.000 DG/L VOMSAAX424 NA - Not Analyzed ND - Not Detected TBE - Trip Blank Item Additional Comment Explanations (NO/DL) ALKALINITY, CARBONATE NITROGEN, NITRATE LEAD -TOTAL MAGNESIUM -TOTAL SELENIUM -TOTAL SBRA226228 CARBONATE ALKALINITY IS 0 MG/L BECAUSE SAMPLE PH < 8.3. Dilution factor 2 applied. Dilution factor 5 applied. Dilution factor 5 applied. Dilution factor 5 applied. CORE A fl4 my Site: 488 — Central Weld County Sanitary Landfill Weld County Road 271/2 Milikea CO 80543 Page: 2 NMI ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING LABORATORIES, INC CLIE Sample Sample Sample NT REPORT Point: LFOD ENS: 92-11934 Sampled: 18-JUL-1992 Typo: RIV/STREAM NP: 488921 Received: 17-001-1992 Number: AF2942 REV: 00 Reported: 1-SEP-1992 Analyte Result RN. AL Units Comments Method 1.1.2-TRICHLOROETHANE 6531533 U tl S O Stl6 tl355 O G O O S 000 S S C O S O S 000Y G S S Dp 5 1.000 0C/L V0MSAAX424 1,1-DXCHLOROETHANE 3.000 aG/L VOMSAAX424 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE 2.000 OG:/L V0MSAAX424 1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE 2.000 OWL VOMSAAX424 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 2.000 UG/L VOMSAAX424 1,4-OICHLORO-2-BUTENE(TOTAL) 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 1.4-DIFLUOROBENZENE 2-BOTANONE 20.000 OG/L UG/L V0MSAAX424 V0MSAAX424 2-CHLOROETHYLVINYL ETHER 5.000 OC/L ST V0MSAAX424 2-HEXANONE 4.000 OC/L VOMSAAX424 4-BROMOFLOOROBENZENE 0.800 OC/L VOMSAAX424 4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE 5.000 OG/L V0MSAAX424 ACETONE 25.000 00/L VOMSAAX424 ACROLEIN 10.000 OC/L PY VOMSOAX101 ACRYLONITRILE 10.000 UG/L PY VOMSDAX101 BENZENE 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 BROMOCHLOROMETHANE 2.000 OG/L VOMEAAX424 BROMODICHLOROMETHANE 1.000 OC/I. VOMSAAX424 BROMOFORM 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAC424 BROMOMETHANE 2.000 OC/L V0MSAAX424 CARSON DISULFIDE 3.000 0C/L VOMSAAX424 CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 1.000 OWL VOMSAAX424 CHLOROBENZENE 1.000 0G/L V0MSAAX424 CHLOROETHANE 3.000 OC/L VOMSAAX424 CHLOROFORM 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 CHLOROMETHANE 2.000 OG/L V0MSAAX424 CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1.000 PC/L VOMSAAX424 DXBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 1.000 OC/L V0MSAAX424 DIBROMOMETHANE 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 DICHLORODXFLOOROMETHANE 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 ETHANOL 100.000 OG/L PY. VOMSDAX101 ETHYL METHACRYLATE 10.000 OG/L PY VOMSDAX101 ETHYLBENZENE 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 IODOMETHANE 2.000 UG/L VOMSAAX424 METHYLENE CHLORIDE 3.000 UG/L VOMSAAX424 STYRENE 1.000 00/L VOMSAAX424 TETRACHLOROETHENE 1.000 0G/L VOMSAAX424 TOLUENE 1.000 OG/L V0MSAAX424 TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 3.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1.000 CC/L VOMSAAX424 TRICHLOROETHENE 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 TRICHLOROFLOOROMETHANE 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 VINYL ACETATE 4,000 UG/L _ VOMSAAX424 VINYL CHLORIDE -- 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 XYLENE(TOTAL) 2.000 OC/L VOMSAAX424 NA - Not Analyzed ND - Not Detected TBE - Trip Blank 931061 Site: 488 — Central Weld County Sanitary Landfill Weld County Road 271/2 Miliken CO 80543 Page: 3 mNI EHVIROm4ENTAL MONITORING LABORATORIES, INC CLIENT REPORT Sample Point: NDIS ENS: 92-11934 Sampled: 16-JUL-1992 sample Type: RIV/STREAM MP: 488921 Received: 17-JUL-1992 Sample !Nober: AF2941 REV: 00 Reported: 1-SEP-1992 Analyts Result DC. RI Units Comments Method FIELD DATA: PH.FIELD PH FIELD - PN FIELD PH FIELD • SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD WATER TEMPERATURE IN DEGREES CELSIUS CHEMICAL METHODS A ROBOTICS: 8.02 8.01 7.99 7.98 1350. 1350. 1360. 1360. 16.2 PH UNITS PH UNITS Pk UNITS PH UNITS UIWOS/Q! UM[OS/CM UM{OS/CM . UMHOS/CM DEGREES C FDPHOUADO1 FDPHQUADO1 FOPHQUADO1 FDPHQUADOI FDSPCONDO4 £DSPCONDO4 FDSPCONDO4 FOSPCONDO4 FDXTEMPC01 ALEALINITY,BICARSONATE 542 100.000 MG/L DL CRALEBIC01 ALEAL/NITY,CARBONATE ND 10.000 MC/L NO CRALXC0301 CHLORIDE 13.0 0.500 MG/L CRCHLORIO1 NITROGEN, AMMONIA ND 0.020 MG/L CRN2NH3X01 NITROGEN, NITRATE 3.12 0.100 MG/L DI, CRNO3HYD01 SULFATE 542 5.000 MG/L CRSCLFAT01 INORGANICS: ARSENIC -TOTAL ND 10.000 OGG/L INGFAA70AS BARIUM -TOTAL - ND 200.000 OG/L INICPTOTBA CADMIUM -TOTAL ND 5.000 00/L INICPTOTCD CALCIUM -TOTAL 171000 5000.000, OG/L INICPTOTCA CHROMIUM -TOTAL IRON TOTAL ND 5320 10.000 100.000 UG/L UG/L INICPTOTCR INICPTOTFE LEAD -TOTAL ND 5.000 UG/L INGFAATOPB MAGNESIUM -TOTAL 82200 5000.000 OG/L INICPTOTMC MANGANESE -TOTAL 287 15.000 7G/L INICPTOTMN MERCURY -TOTAL ND 0.200 DG/L INCVAATORG POTASSIUM -TOTAL ND 5000.000 UG/L INFAATOTXE SELENIUM -TOTAL ND 25.000 00/L DL INGFAATOSE SILVER -TOTAL ND 25.000 DG/L INICPTOTAG SODIUM -TOTAL 49400 5000.000 UG/L INICPTOTNA SUB -CONTRACT DATA: GROSS ALPHA 5.5 0.100 PCI/L +/- SBALPHBETA GROSS SETA 0.6 0.,100 PCI/L +/- SBALPHBETA RADIUM 226 RADIUM 226 -STANDARD DEVIATION 0.6 0.7 0.100 PCl/L +/- PCT/L +/- NA,SB NA,SB SBRA226228 SBRA226228 RADIUM 228 ND 0.100 PCI/L r/- NA,SB 58RA226228 RADIUM 228 -STANDARD DEVIATION STANDARD DEVIATION -GROSS ALPHA STANDARD DEVIATION -GROSS BETA 5EMI-VOLATILE ORGANICS:- 2.2 7.9 8.6 PCI/L +/- PCl/L +/- PCl/L +/- NA,S8 SBRA226228 SBAI.PHBETA SBALPHBETA 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOXYACETIC ACID ND 1.000 UG/L 5VCC2HR801 2-(2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOXY)PROPIONIC ACID ND 1.000 DC/L SVGC2HRB0I ENDRIN ND 0.100 UG/L SVGC10CP01 LINDANE (GAMMA-BRC) ND 0.050 aG/L SVGC10CP01 METHOXYCHLOR ND 0,500 DG/L SVGCIOCP01 TOXAPHENE ND 1.000 UG/L SVCCIOCPO1 VOLATILE ORGANICS: 1,1,1-TR:CHLOROETHANE ND 2.000 UG/L VOMSAAX424 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 1,1,2-TRICHLOR0ETH7)NE ND 1.000 UG/L VOMSAAX424 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE ND 3.000 UG/L VOMSAAX424 NA - Not Analysed ND - Not Detected IBA - Trip Blank Item Additional Consent Explanations (N010L) ALKALINITY, BICARBONATE ALKALINITY, CARBONATE NITROGEN, NITRATE SELENIUM -TOTAL Dilution factor 10 applied. CARBONATE ALKALINITY IS 0 MG/L BECAUSE SAMPLE PH < 8.3. Dilution factor 2 applied. Dilution factor 5 applied. Site: 488 — Central weld County Sanitary Landlill Weld County Road 271/2 P,.liken CO 80543 Page: 4 NMI ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING LABORATORIES, INC CLIENT REPORT Sample Point: NDIS ENS: 92-11934 Sampled: 16-JOL-1992 Sample Type: RSV/STREAM MP: 488921 Received: 17-.7DL-1992 Sample Number: AF2941 REV: 00 Reported: 1 -SNP -1992 Analyze Result ENE RI Units Comments Method 1,1-DXCHLOROETHENE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 1,2.3-TRICHLOROPROPANE ND 2.000 UG/L VOMSAAX424 1,2-OICHLOROETRANE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 1,2-OICHLOROPROPANE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 1,4-DICHLORO-2-BOTENE(TOTAL) ND 2.000 0G/L VOMSAAX424 1,4-OIFLOOROZENZENE NA - 0G/L V0MSAAX424 2-B0TAN0NE ND 20.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 2-CNLOROETHYLVINYL ETHER ND 5.000 OG/L V0MSAAX424 2-HEXANONE ND 4.000 00/1. VOMSAAX424 4-BROMOFLOOROBENZENE ND 0.800 UG/L VOMSAAX424 4 -METHYL -2 -PENTANONE ND 5.000 OC/L VOMSAAX424 ACETONE ND 25.000 0G/L VOMSAAX424 ACROLEIN ND 10.000 OG/L PY VOMSDAX101 ACRYLONXTRILE ND 10.000 00/L PY VOMSDAX101 BENZENE ND 1.000 00/1. VOMSAAX424 BROMOCHLOROMETHANE ND 2.000 UG/,'. VOMSAAX424 BROMODICHLOROMETHANE ND 1.000 0G/. VOMSAAX424 BROMOFORM ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 BROMOME:HANE ND 2.000 DG/L V0MSAAX424 CARBON DISULFIDE ND 3.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 CARBON TETRACHLORIDE ND 1.000 0G/L VOMSAAX424 CHLOROBENZENE ND 1.000 00/L VOMSAAX424 CHLOROETHANE ND 3.000 OWL V0MSAAX424 CHLOROFORM ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 CHLOROMETHANE ND 2.000 00/L V0MSAAX424 CIS -1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE ND 1.000 UG/L V0MSAAX424 DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE ND 1.000 00/L VOMSAAX424 DIBROMOMETHANE ND 1.000 00/L VOMSAAX424 DICHLORODIFLOOROMETHANE ND 2.000 UG/L VOMSAAX424 ETHANOL ND 100.000 OG/L PY VOMSDAX101 ETHYL METHACRYLATE ND 10.000 00/I. PY VOMSDAX101 ETHYLBENZENE ND 1.000 OWL VOMSAAX424 IODOMETHANE ND 2.000 OC/L VOMSAAX424 METHYLENE CHLORIDE ND 3.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 STYRENE ND 1.000 OC/L V0MSAAX424 TETRACHLOROETHENE NO 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 TOLUENE ND 1.000 UG/L VOMSM.X424 TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE ND 3.000 CIO/L VOMSAAX424 TRANS-2,3-DICHLOROPROPENE ND 1.000 OO/L VOMSAAX424 TRICHLOROETHENE ND 1.000 00/10 VOMSAAX424 TRICHLOROFLOOROMETHANE ND 2.000 UG/L V0MSAAX424 VINYL ACETATE ND 4.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 VINYL CHLORIDE ND 2.000 OC/L V0MSAAX424 XYLENE(TOTAL) ND 2.000 OWL VOMSAAX424 NA - Not Analyzed ND .• Not Detected TILE - Trip Blank 931061 Site: 488 — Central Weld County Sanitary Landfill weld County Road 271/2 M111ken CO 80543 Page: 5 NMI ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING LABORATORIES, INC CLIENT R. E P O A T Sample Point: RPIN.,:.�_--,ENS: 92-11934 Sampled: I6-JUL-1992 Sample Type: RIV/STRE_.. -'MP: 488921 Received: 17 -JON -1992 Sample Number: AF2940""- REV: 00 Reported: 1-SEP-1992 Analyte Result EM. RL Units Cants Method FIELD DATA: PH FIELD PH FIELD PH FIELD PH FIELD SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD WATER TEMPERATURE IN DEGREES CELSIUS CHEMICAL, METHODS L ROBOTICS: 7.53 7.53 . 7.51 7.50 2930. 2930. 2960. 2900. 14.8 PH UNITS PH UNITS PR UNITS PH UNITS UmmOs/CM D)elot/CM 0M105/CM OMSOS/CM DEGREES C - FDPHQOADOI FDPHQUAD01 FDPHQUADO1 FDPHQUADOI FDSPCONDO4 FDSPCONDO4 FDSPCONDO4 FDSPCONDO4 FDXTEi4'C01 ALKALINITY,BICARBONATE 316 10.000 MG/L CRALKBICOI ALKALINITY,CARBONATE ND 10.000 MG/L NO CRALXC030I CHLORIDE 27.0 0.500 MG/L CRCHLORIO1 NITROGEN, AMMONIA ND 0.020 MG/L CRN2NH3X01 NITROGEN, NITRATE 8.27 0.500 MG/L DL CRNO3HY001 SULFATE 1310 5.000 MG/L CRSULFATC1 INORGANICS: ARSENIC -TOTAL ND 10.000 UG/L INGFAAT0A5 BARIUM -TOTAL ND 200.000 UG/L INICPTOTAA CADMIUM -TOTAL ND 5..000 OG/L INICPTOTCD CALCIUM -TOTAL 366000 5000..000 OG/L INICPTOTCA CHROMIUM -TOTAL ND 10.000 OG/L INICPTOTCR IRON -TOTAL ND 100.000 OG/L INICPTOTFE LEAD -TOTAL ND 25.000 OG/L DL INGFAATOPB MAGNESIUM -TOTAL 173000 5000-.000 OG/L INICPTOTMG MANGANESE -TOTAL ND 15.000 OG/L INICPTOTMN MERCURY -TOTAL ND 0.200 OG/L INCVAATOHG POTASSIUM -TOTAL ND 5000.000 DG/L INFAATOTXK SELENIUM -TOTAL ND 25.000 DG/L DL INGFAATOSE SILVER -TOTAL ND 25.000 owl. INICPTOTAG 'SODIUM -TOTAL 139000 5000.000 OG/L INICPTOTAA SUB -CONTRACT DATA: GROSS ALPHA 52.4 0.100 PCl/L +/- SBALPHBETA GROSS BETA 2.0 0.100 PC::/L +/- SBALPHBETA RADIUM 226 0.2 0.100 PC::/L +/- S8 SBRA226228 RADIUM 226 -STANDARD DEVIATION 1.1 PCT:/L +/- Ss SBRA226228 RADIUM 228 ND 0.100 PC::/L +1- SB SBRA226228 RADIUM 228 -STANDARD DEVIATION STANDARD DEVIATION -GROSS ALPHA STANDARD: DEVIATION -GROSS BETA SEMI -VOLATILE ORGANICS: 4.7 25.6 20.3 PCl/L 4/- PCI/L +/- PCI/L +/- SB SBRA226228 5BALPfO3ETA SBAIPMBETA 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOXYACETIC ACID ND 1.000 UG/L SVGC2HR801 2-(2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOXY)PROPIONIC ACID ND 1.000 OG/L SVGC2HRB01 ENDRIN - ND 0.100 OG/L SVCC10CP01 LINDANE (GAMMA-BHC) ND 0.050 DG/L SVGCIOCP01 METHOXYCHLOR ND 0.500 UG/L SVGCIOCP01 TOXAPHENE ND 1.000 UC/L SVGC10CP01 VOLATILE ORGANICS: 1,1.1 .RICHLOROETHANE NO 2.000 UG/L VOMSAAX424 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ND 2.000 UG/L V0MSAAX424 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 NA - Not Analyzed ND - Not Detected TOE - Trip Blank Item Additional Comment Explanations (NQ/DL) ALKALINITY,CARBONATE NITROGEN, NITRATE LEAD -TOTAL SELENIUM -TOTAL s8RA226228 CARBONATE ALKALINITY IS 0 MG/L BECAUSE SAMPLE PH < 8.3. Dilution factor 10 applied. Dilution factor 5 applied. Dilution factor 5 applied. CORE 931061 Site: 488 — Central Weld County Sanitary Landfill Weld County Road 271/2 Miliken CO 80543 NMI ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING LABORATORIES, INC CLIENT REPORT Sample Sample Sample Page: 6 Point: RPIN '^^t ENS: 92-11934 Sampled: 16-JOL-1992 Type: ,RIV/STREAfl _IW:i 488921 Received: 17 -JCL -1992 Nimber:•AF2940"."-- REV: 00 Reported: I-SEP-1992 Analyte Result EEL RL Onita Gaunt. Method 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE ND 3.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE ND 2.000 OG/L V0MSAAX424 1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 1,4-DICHLORO-2-BOTENE(TOTAL) ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 1,4-0IFLDOROEJNZENE 2-BOTANONE NA ND 20.000 OG/L OG/L VOMSAAX424 VOKSAAX424 2-CHLOROETHYLVINYL ETHER ND 5.000 OC/L ST VOMSAAX424 2-HEXANONE ND 4.000 00/1, VOMSAAX424 4-BROMOFLDOROBENZENE ND 0.800 .00/L VOMSAAX424 4 -METHYL -2 -PENTANONE NO 5.000 OG/L V0MSAAX424 ACETONE ND 25.000 00/L VOMSAAX424 ACROLEIN ND 10.000 OG/L VOMSDAX101 ACRYLONI:RILE ND 10.000 OWL VOMSDAX101 BENZENE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 BROMOCHLOROMETHANE - ND 2.000 CC/L VOMSAAX424 BROMODICHLOROMETHANE ND 1.000 00/L VOMSAAX424 BROMOFORM ND 1.000 00/1, VQMSAAX424 BROMOMETHANE ND 2.000 OG/L vomsnot424 CARBON OISDLFIDE ND 3.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 CARBON TETRACHLORIDE ND 1.000 CC/L VOMSAAX424 CHLOR05ENZENE ND 1.000 OC/L VOMSAAX424 CHLOROET..ANE NP 3.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 CHLOROFORM ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 CHLOROMETHANE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 CIS -1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE ND 1.000 OO/L VOMSAAX424 DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 DIBROMOMETHANE ND 1.000 OC/L VOMSAAX424 DICHLORODIFLOOROMETHANE ND 2.000 OC/L VOMS.AX424 ETHANOL ND 100.000 CG/L VOMSDAX101 ETHYL METHACRYLATE ND 10.000 OG/L VOMSDAX101 ETHYLBENZENE ND 1.000 00/1. VOMSAAX424 IODOMETHANE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 METHYLENE CHLORIDE .ND 3.000 DO/L VOMSAAX424 STYRENE ND 1.000 OC/L VOMSAAX424 TETRACHLOROETHENE - ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 TOLDENE ND 1.000 OC/L VOMSAAX424 TRANS -1,2 -DICHLOROETHENE ND 3.000 OC/L VOMSAAX424 TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 TRICHLOROETHENE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 TRICHL0R0FLOOROMETHAANE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 VINYL ACETATE ND k.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 VINYL CHLORIDE ND 2.000 OG/L - VOMSAAX424 XYLENE(TOTAL) ND 2.000 CG/L VOMSAAX424 NA - Not Analyzed ND - Not Detected TBE - Trip Blank 931061 /Q% Site; 488 - Central Weld County Sanitary Landfill ' weld County Road 271/2 Miliken CO 80543 Page: 7 WI EdVIRORMENTAL MONITORING LABORATORIES. INC .CLIENT REPORT Sample Point: Si ENs:'92-11934 Sampled: 16-JUL-1992 Sample Type: ' STREAM MP: 488921 Received: 17-JUL-1992 Sample Number: T2943 REV: 00 Reported: 1-5EP-1992 Analyte Result flc. RL Units Comments Method FIELD DATA: 8,35 PH OMITS £DPHQOA001 PH FIELD PH UNITS FDPHQUADOI PH FIELD 8,35 PH UNITS FDPHQOADO1 PH FIELD 8.34 PR UNITS FDPHQUADOI PH FIELD 8.32 ORROS/C4 FDSPCONDO4 SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD 1358. OM105/CM FDSPCONDO4 SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD 1357. UMI05/CM FDSPCONDO4 SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD CONDUCTANCEFIELD 1348. 1323. UM4OS/CM FDSPCONDO4 TEMPERATURESPECIFIC IN DEGREES CELSIUS 19.5 DEGREES C FDXTEMPC01 CHEMICAL METHODS i ROBOTICS: 143 10.000 MG/L CRAI.703IC01 CIDITY, CARBONATE ALKALINITY,CARBONATE ND 10.000 0.500 MG/L MG/L NQ CRALXC0301 CRCHLORI01 CHLORIDE NITROGEN, AMMONIA 9.0 0D 0.020 MG/L CRN2NR3X01 CRNO3HYDO1 NITROGEN, NITRATE SULFATE 0.064 553 0.050 50.000 MG/L MG/L DL CRSULFATOI t INORGANICS: 10.000 UG/L INGFAAI'OAS ARSENIC -TOTAL ND 200,000 OG/L INICPTOTCA BARI7M-TOTAL ND 5.000 OG/L INICPTOTCD CALCIUM -TOTAL ND 5000.000 OG/L INICPTOTCA CALCIUM-TOTL 147000 10.000 OG/L INICPTOTCR IRON ND 100.000 OC/L INICPTOTFE IRON -TOTAL 254 5.000 0G/L INGFAATOPB LEAD-TOTALBM-TOTAL ND 5000.000 0G/L INICPTOTCG MANGANISE 101000 277 15.000 OG/L INICPTOTCN MERCURY -TOTAL ND 0.200 5000.000 UG/L PG/L INCVAATOHC INFAATOTXE SELENXCM"TOTAL SELENIUM -TOTAL SILVER -TOTAL SODIUM -TOTAL ND ND 72200 25.000 25.000 5000.000 OG/L OWL OG/L - DL INGFAATOSE INICPTOTCG INICPTOTCA SUB -CONTRACT DATA: GROSS ALPHA GROSS BETA RADIUM 226 RADIUM 226 -STANDARD DEVIATION RADIUM 228 RADIUM 228 -STANDARD DEVIATION STANDARD DEVIATION -GROSS ALPHA STANDARD DEVIATION -GROSS BETA 15.8 ND 0.2 0.6 ND 2.3 11.4 8.6 0.100 0.100 0.100 0.100 PCY/L +/- PCI/L +/- PcI/L +/- PCI/L +/- PCI/L +/- PCI/L +/- PCI/L +/- PCI/L +/- SE SB SB SB • SBALPHBETA SBALPIGETA SBRA226228 5BRA226228 SBRA226228 SBRA226228 SBALPHSETA SBALPHBETA SEMI -VOLATILE. ORGANICS: 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOXYACETIC ACID 2-(2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOXY)PROPIONIC ACID ND ND 1.000 1.000 QG/L 0G/L 5VGC2HR801 SVGC 2HRB01 ENDRIN LINDANE (GAMMA-BHC) METHOXYCHLOR TOXAPHENE ND ND ND 0.100 0.050 0.500 1.000 VG/1. DG/L 0G/L 0G/L SVGC10CP01 5vGC10CP01 svacloCPOI VOLATILE ORGANICS: 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETKANE 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE ND ND ND 2.000 2.000 1.000 OC/L OG/L OG/L 130/L VOMSAAXS124 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAXC24 VOSAAX424 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE ND L 3.000 Tel . Grin Blank NA - Not Analyzed Item Additional Cant Explanations (NO/DL) ALKALINITY, CARBONATE SULFATE SELENIUM -TOTAL SBRA226228 CARBONATE ALKALINITY I5 0 MG/L BECAUSE SAMPLE PH < 8.3. Dilution factor 10 applied. Dilution factor 5 applied. ENSECO NJ 931061 Iv Site: 488 - Central Weld County Sanitary Landfill Weld County Road 271/2 Miliken CO 80543 Page: 8 ac ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING LABORATORIES, INC CLIENT REPORT Sample Point: SPLAXE ENS: 92-11934 Sampled: 16 -JCL -1992 Sample Type: RIV/STREAM MP: 488921 Received: 17-JUL-1992 Sample Number: AF2943 REV: 00 Reported: 1-SEP-1992 Analyte - Result EN4. RL Unita Comments Method 1.1-DICHLOROETHENE ND 2.000 0G/L VOMSAAX424 1.2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE ND 2.000 OGIL VOMSAAX424 1.2-DICHLOROETHANE ND 2.000 0G/L VOMSAAX424 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE ND 2.000 UG/L VOMSAAX424 1,4-DICHLORO-2-BOTENE(TOTAL) ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 l,4-DIFLOOROBENZENE 2-B0TAN0NE NA ND 20.000 OG/L OG/L VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 2-CHLOROETHYLVINYL ETHER ND 5.000 0G/L ST VOMSAAX424 2-HEXANONE ND 4.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 4-BROMOFLOOROBENZENE ND 0.800 0G/L VOMSAAX424 4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE ND 5.000 UG/L V0MSAAX424 ACETONE ND 25.000 UG/L VOMSAAX424 ACROLEIN ND 10.000 UG/L PY VOMSDAX101 ACRYLONITRILE ND 10.000 UG/L PY VOMSDAX101 BENZENE ND 1,000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 BROMOCHLOROMETHANE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 BROMODICHLOROMETHANE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 BROMOFORM ND 1.000 DG/L VOMSAAX424 BROMOMETHANE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 CARBON DISULFIDE ND 3.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 CARBON TETRACHLORIDE ND 1.000 00/L VOMSAAX424 CHLOROBENZENE ND 1.000 UG/L VOMSAAX424 CHLOROETHANE ND 3.000 00/L VOMSAAX424 CHLOROFORM ND 2.000 00/L VOMSAAX424 CHLOROMETHANE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE ND 1.000 UG/L VOMSAAX424 DIBROMOCHLOROMETMANE ND 1.000 0C/L VOMSAAX424 DIBROMOMETHANE DICHLORODIFLCOROMETHANE ND ND 1.000 2.000 OG/L OG/L VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 ETHANOL ND 100.000 OG/L PY VO$S0AX101 ETHYL METHACRYLITE ND 10.000 OC/L PY VOMSDAX101 ETHYLBENZENE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 IODOMETHANE ND 2.000 0G/L VOMSAAX424 METHYLENE CHLORIDE ND 3.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 STYRENE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 TETRACHLOROETH£NE ND 1.000 0C/L VOMSAAX424 TOLUENE ND 1.000 OCR. VOMSAAX424 TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE ND 3.000 OC/L VOMSAAX424 TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE ND 1.000 0G/L V0MSAAX424 TRICHLOROETHENE ND 1.000 OC/L VOMSAAX424 TRICHLOROFL0OROMETHANE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 VINYL ACETATE ND 4.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 VINYL CHLORIDE ND 2.000 UC/L VOMSAAX424 XYLENE(TOTAL) ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 NA - Not Analyzed ND - Not Detected TBE - Trip Blank 931061 • WMI Environmental Monitoring Laboratories, Inc. 2100 Clearwater Drive Geneva, Illinois 60134 708/208.3100 A Waste Management Company Enclosed are the analytical results for samples received from your facility. The results in the Client Report are for a single ENS (Event Notification System) number only. The sampling event at your facility may include multiple ENS numbers. A separate Client Report will be generated for each one. It is the goal of WMI Environmental Monitoring Laboratories, Inc. to provide analytical data in a timely fashion, formatted in a way that our clients will find most useful. If you have any questions concerning the form or content of this report, please contact the WMI EML Customer Operations Department: Main Number (708) 208-3100 FAX Number (708) 208-1175 Note: Two designations may appear in the results column of your Client Report: NA or ND. The designation NA (for "Not Analyzed") is used to identify analytes which were requested in the monitoring program, but for which no suitable testing methodology exists. NA may also indicate a dry well, broken sample bottle, insufficient sample volume, or other condition which precludes analysis for a sample. The designation ND (for "Not Detected") is used to indicate that the analyte of interest was not found at or above the concentration listed under the EMLRL (EMI. Reporting Limit) heading. Unless otherwise indicated, all analytes meet the requirements of holding time as specified in the method. Bruce Warden Assistant Director Laboratory Operations Fra Mena Qualit •grams a 931061 • Data Qualifier Comment Code Definitions AR Add surrogate recoveries did not meet the acceptance criteria of the method. Oxidation degradation due to sample matrix was confirmed. BB: Broken bottle. BL- The method blank concentration associated with this analyte did not meet the acceptance criteria of the method. CL The concentration of this compound exceeded the calibration used for this analysis. The concentration reported is estimated. CU: Co -elution with another compound interferes with the quantitation of this compound. The concentration reported is estimated. DL: The sample was diluted during analysis. Reporting limits have been adjusted where necessary. DP: This sample was analyzed in duplicate. The relative percent difference between the two results did not meet the acceptance criteria of the method. DW: Dry well HS: The headspace in this sample bottle exceeded 6 millimeters. IS: The internal standard recoveries associated with this analysis did not meet the acceptance criteria of the method. IV: The bottle did not contain enough sample to perform the analysis. MP: 3-methylhphenol and 4methylphenol co -elute under the analytical conditions of the method, and can not be differentiated solely on the basis of their mass spectra. The concentrations reported may be either or both isomers. This sample was used as a matrix spike. The percent recovery did not meet the acceptance criteria of the method. The analysis of a quality control standard showed the analytical system was in control. The result reported may therefore be affected by matrix interferences. NN: N-nitrosodiphenylamine can not be distinguished from diphenylamine using gas chromatography. The concentrations reported may be either or both compounds. NQ: No standard qualifier code is in use for this qualification. See the associated comment. NS: There was not enough sample to repeat this analysis. L PL This result may be a product of contamination from phthalate plasticizers, which are a common lab contaminant. PS: This sample required preservation in the field to a pH of less than 2. The pH was checked after receipt at the lab, and did not have a pH of less than 2. PY: This sample required preservation in the field to a pH of 4 to 5. The pH was checked after receipt at the lab, and did not have a pH of4to5. PZ: This sample required preservation in the field to a pH of 12 or greater. The pH was checked after receipt at the lab, and did not have a pH of 12 or greater. Q%: This sample was used as a matrix spike. The percent recovery did not meet the acceptance criteria of the method. The analysis of a quality control standard showed the analytical system was out -of -control. Theanalytical result for this parameter in the unspiked sample is suspect and may not be reported for regulatory compliance purposes. RA Acid surrogate recoveries associated with this analysis did not ` meet the acceptance criteria of the method. RB: Base/neutral surrogate recoveries associated with this analysis did not meet the acceptance criteria of the method. SB: The analysis of this sample was performed by an approved subcontract laboratory. ST: This compound is not stable in acidic water. SU: The analysis of the surrogate with this sample did not meet the acceptance criteria of the method. TB: The analysis for this parameter was conducted after the holding time specified in the method. UN: This compound is not stable under the conditions of the analysis. 931061 /.1 Site: 488 — Central Weld County Sanitary Landfill Weld County Road 273,/2 Miliken CO 80543 NMI ENVIROAKMAL MONITORING LABORATORIES, INC CLIENT REPORT Semple Point: 01FH s.+ple Type: WELL Semple Number: AF2928 Page: 1 ENS: 92-11933 Sampled: 16 -JAL -1992 MP 488921 Received: IT-JDL-1992 REV: 00 Reported: 2-SEP-1992 Analyte Result EML RL Units Comments Method FIELD DATA: DEPTH TO WATER FROM TOP OF CASING GROUNDWATER ZLEV. PH FIELD PH FIELD PH FIELD PH FIELD SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD WATER TEMPERATURE IN DEGREES CELSIUS WELL DEPTH TOTAL CHEMICAL METHODS 4 ROBOTICS: ALKALINITY,BICARBONATE ALKALINITY,CARBONATE - CHLORIDE NITROGEN, AMMONIA NITROGEN, NITRATE SULFATE INORGANICS: ARSENIC -DISSOLVED BARIUM -DISSOLVED CADMIUM -DISSOLVED CALCIUM -DISSOLVED CHROMIUM -DISSOLVED IRON -DISSOLVED LEAD -DISSOLVED MAGNESIUM -DISSOLVED MANGANESE -DISSOLVED MERCURY -DISSOLVED POTASSIUM -DISSOLVED SELENIUM -DISSOLVED SILVER -DISSOLVED SODIUM -DISSOLVED SUB -CONTRACT DATA: GROSS ALPHA GROSS BETA RADIUM 226 RADIUM 226 -STANDARD DEVIATION RADIUM 228 RADIUM 228 -STANDARD DEVIATION STANDARD DEVIATION -GROSS ALPHA STANDARD DEVIATION -GROSS BETA SEMI -VOLATILE ORGANICS: " 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOXYACETIC ACID 2-(2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOXY)PROPIONIC ACID ENDRIN LINDANE (GAMMA-BHC) MSVGC10CP01 METHOXYCHLOR TOXAPHENE VOLATILE ORGANICS: 1 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 1.1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1,1.2-TRICHLOROETHANE NA NA 6.82 6.84 6.90 6.93 10.3 10.3 10.7 10.9 19.6 NA ND ND ND 0.41 0.21 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 24.2 ND ND 1 ND 4.7 3.9 2.3 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND - 10.000 10,000 0.500 0.020 0.050 5.000 10.000 200.000 5.000 5000.000 10.000 100.000 5.000 5000.000 15.000 0.200 5000.000 5.000 25.000 5000.000 0.100 0.100 0.100 0.100 1.000 1.000 0.100 0.050 0,500 1.000 2.000 2.000 1.000 FT FT HSL PH UNITS PH UNITS PH UNITS PH UNITS UMDI0S/O1 014IOS/CM UMHOS/CM UMHOS/CM DEGREES C £T MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L OG/L OWL SG/L UG/L OG/L OG/L OG/L DG/L DO/L OG/L OG/L DG/L OG/L UG/L PCl/L +1- PCI/L +/- PCI/L +/- PCI/L +/- PCI/L +/- PCI/L +/- PCl/L +/- PCl/L +/- UG/L UG/L OG/L UG/L UG/L• OG/L O0/L UG/L UG/L NQ SB SB SB SB • FDWDTWTC01 FDWGWELWDT FD➢HQUADO1 FDPHOUADOI FDPHQUADO1 £DPHOOADO1 FDSPCONDO4 FDSPCONDO4 ' FDSPCON004 FDSPCONDO4 FDXTEMPC01 FDWGWELWDT CRAI.XBICO1 CRALEC0301 CRCHLORI01 CRN2NH3X01 CRNO3HZDO1 CRSULFXT01 INGFAADIA3 INICPDISB1 INICPDISCD INICPDI5CA INICPDISCR INICPDISFE ING£AADIPB INICPDISMG INICPDISMN INCVAADIHG INFAADIS)OC INGFAADISE INICPDISAG INICPDISNA SBALPHBETA SBALPHBETA 5BRA226228 SBRA226228 SBRA226228 SBKA226228 SBALPHBETA SBALPHBETA SVGC2HRB01 SVGC2HRB01 SVGCIOCP01 SVGC10CP01 SVGC10cP01 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 NA - Not Analyzed ND - Not Detected TBK - Trip Blank Item Additional Comment Explanations (NO/OL1 ALKALINITY, CARBONATE SBRA226228 CARBONATE ALKALINITY IS 0 MG/L BECAUSE SAMPLE PH < 8.3. CORE Page: 2 mC EBVIROzacKtrat MOIRTORING LABORATORIES, INC CLIENT REPORT Site: 488 - Central Weld County Sanitary Landfill Weld County Road 271/2 Miliken CO 80543 Sample Point: 01FB Sample Type: WELL Sample Number: AF2928 ENS: 92-11933 Sampled: 16 -JCL -1992 MP: 488921 Received: 17-JUL-1992 REV: 00 Reported: 2-SEP-1992 Analyte Result DC. Mt Units Comments Method 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE ND 3,000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 1,1=DICHLOROETHENE ND 2.000 OC/L V0MSAAX424 1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE ND 2.000 UG/L VOMSAAX424 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE ND 2.000 0G/L VOMSAAX424 1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE NO 2.000 OC/L V0MSAAX424 1,4-DICHLOR0-2-BOTENE(TOTAL) ND 2.000 OC/L VOMSAAX424 1,4-DIFLOOROBENZENE NA 00/1. VOMSAAX424 2-BUTANONE ND 20.000 OC/L VOMSAAX424 2-CHLOROETHYLVINYL ETHER NO 5.000 OG/L ST VOMSAAX424 2-HEXANONE ND 4.000 CG/L VOMSAAX424 4-BROMOFLOOROBENZENE ND 0.800 UG/L VOMSAAX424 4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE ND 5.000 CG/L VOMSAAX424 CETONE ND 25.000 CG/L VOMSAAX424 CROLEIN ND 10.000 UC/L PY VOMSDAX101 CRYLONITRILE ND 10.000 CG/L PY VOMSDAX101 ENZENE ND 1.000 UG/L VOMSAAX424 ROMOCHLOROMETHANE ROMODICHLOROMETHANE Nrr�� I:�D 2.000 1.000 OG/L CC/L - VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 ROMOFORM ND 1.000 OC/L VOMSAAX424 ROMOMETHANE ND 2.000 00/L VOMSAAXP24 CARBON DISULFIDE ND 3.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 CARBON TETRACHLORIDE ND 1.000 CG/L VOMSAAX424 CHLOROBENZENE ND 1.000 OC/L V0MSAAX424 CHLOROETHANE ND 3.000 UG/L VOMSAAX424 CHLOROFORM 4. 2.000 CC/L VOMSAAX424 CHLOROMETHANE ND 2.000 CG/L VOMSAAX424 CIS -1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 DIBROM.00HLOROMETHANE ND 1.000 CC/L VOMSAAX424 DIBR0M0METHANE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 DICHLORODIFLOOROMETHANE ND 2.000 CC/L VOMSAAX424 ETHANOL ND 100.000 OG/L PY VOMSDAX101 ETHYL METHACRYLATE ND 10.000 OG/L PY VOMSDAX101 ETHYLBENZENE ND 1.000 OG/I. VOMSAAX424 IODOMETHANE ND 2.000 CC/L vOMSAAX424 METHYLENE CHLORIDE ND 3.000 CG/L VOMSAAX424 STYRENE ND 1.000 CC/L VOMSAAX424 TETRACHLOROETHENE ND 1.000 CG/L VOMSAAX424 TOLUENE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 TRANS -1,2 -DICHLOROETHENE ND 3.000 CG/L VOMSAAX424 TRANS -1.3 -DICHLOROPROPENE ND 1.000 OC/L VOMSAAX424 TRICHLOROETHENE ND 1.000 UG/L VOMSAAX424 TRICHLOROFLCOROMETHANE ND 2.000 0G/L VOMSAAX424 VINYL ACETATE - ND 4.000 UG/L V0MSAAX424 VINYL CHLORIDE ND 2.000 CG/L VOMSAAX424 XYLENE(TOTAL) _ ND 2.000 00/L VOMSAAX424 NA - Not Analyzed ND - Not Detected 1'BE - Trip Blank 931061 /C1 Site: 488 - Central Weld County Sanitary Landfill Weld County Road 271/2 Mlliken CO 80543 HMI ENVIROMENTAL MONITORING LABORATORIES, INC CLIENT REPORT Sample Point: 02FH Sample Type: WELL Sample Number: AF2937 Page: 3 ENS: 92-11933 Sampled: 21-JUL-1992 MP: 488921 Received: 22-JUL-1992 REV: 00 Reported: 2-SEP-1992 Analyte Result AQ. RL Units Comments Method FIELD DATA: DEPTH TO WATER FROM TOP or CASING GROUNDWATER ELEV. PH FIELD PH FIELD PH FIELD PH FIELD SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD SPECIFIC CONDOCTANCE FIELD SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD -WATER TEMPERATURE IN DEGREES CELSIUS WELL DEPTH TOTAL CHElCCAL METHODS 6 ROBOTICS: NA NA 6.50 6.44 6.43 6.57 7.68 7.61 7.71 7.75 26.6 NA FT iv MSL PH UNITS PH UNITS PH UNITS PR UNITS UMIO5/CM oM OS/CM 0M1OS/CM 0l*iOS/OM DEGREES C FT FDWDTWTC01 FDWCWELWDT FDPHQUADOI FDPHQOADOI FDPHQOADOI FDPHQOAD01 FDSPCONDO4 FDSPCONDO4 FDSPCONDO4 FDSPCONDO4 FDXTEMPC01 FDWGWELWDT ALXALINITY,BICARBONATE .NO 10.000 MG/L CRALEBIC01 ALKALINITY,CARBONATE ND 10.000 MG/L NQ CRALEC0301 CHLORIDE 0.6 0.500 MG/L CRCHLORIO1 NITROGEN, AMMONIA ND 0,020 MG/L CRN2NH3X01 NITROGEN, NITRATE 0.13 0.050 MG/I CRNO3HXYDC1 SULFATE ND 5.000 MG/L CRSULFXI01 INORGANICS: ARSENIC -DISSOLVED ND 10.000 UC/L INGFAADIAS BARIUM -DISSOLVED ND 200.000 OG/L INICPDIS8A CADMIUM -DISSOLVED ND 5.000 UG/L INICPDISCD CALCIUM -DISSOLVED ND 5000.000 UG/L INIC^DISCA CHROMIUM -DISSOLVED ND 10,000 UC/L INICPDISCR IRON -DISSOLVED ND 100.000 00/L INICPDISFE LEAD -DISSOLVED ND 5.000 UG/L INGFAADIPB MAGNESIUM -DISSOLVED ND 5000.000 UG/L INICPDISMG MANGANESE -DISSOLVED ND 15.000 OG/L INICPDISMN MERCORY-DISSOLVED ND 0.200 OG/L INCVAADIHG POTASSIUM -DISSOLVED ND 5000.000 0G/L INFAAOISM( SELENIUM -DISSOLVED ND 5.000 OG/L INGFAADISE SILVER -DISSOLVED ND 25.000 UG/L INICPDISAG SODIUM -DISSOLVED ND 5000.000 UG/L INICPDISNA SUB -CONTRACT DATA: GROSS ALPHA ND 0.100 PCl/I. +/- SBALPHBETA GROSS BETA 0.3 0.100 PCZ/L +/- SBALPHBETA RADIUM 226 0.4 0.100 PCI/L +/- SB SBRA226229 RADIUM 226 -STANDARD DEVIATION 0.9 PCl/L +/- 5B SBRA226228 RADIUM 228 ND - 0.100 PCI/L +/- SB SBRA226228 RADIUM 228 -STANDARD DEVIATION STANDARD DEVIATION -GROSS ALPHA STANDARD DEVIATION -GROSS BETA SEMI -VOLATILE ORGANICS: 2 0.7 1.5 PCl/L +/- PCI/L +/- PCl/I +/- SB SBRA226228 SBALPHBETA SBALPHBETA 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOXYACETIC ACID ND 1.000 UC/L SVGC21 B01 2-(2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOXY)PROPIONIC ACID ND 1.000 OG/L SVGC2HRB01 ENDRIN ND 0.100 OG/L SVGC1OCP01 LINDANE (GAMMA—BHC) ND 0.050 UG/L SVGCIOCPOI METHOXYCHLOR ND 0.500 00/L SVGC10CP01 sTOXAPHENE ND 1.000 CG/L SVGC10CP01 VOLATILE ORGANICS: • 1,1,1—TRICHLOROETHANE ND 2.000 OO/1 VOMSAAX424 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ND 2.000 UG/L VOMSAAX420 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE ND 1.000 UG/L VCMSAAX424, NA - Not Analyzed ND - Not Detected TBE - Trip Blank Item Additional Comment Explanations (NQ/DL) ALEALINITY, CARBONATE SBRA226228 CARBONATE ALKALINITY IS 0 MG/L BECAUSE SAMPLE PH < 8.3. CORE , 931061 Site: 488 — Central Weld County Sanitary Landfill Weld County Road 271/2 Mlliken CO 80543 NMI SAL MONITORING LABORATORIES, INC CLIENT REPORT Sample Point: 02FB Sample Type: WELL Sample Number: AF2937 Page: 4 ENS: 92-11933 Sampled: 21 -JCL -1992 MP: 488921 Received: 22-JUL-1992 REV: 00 Reported: 2-SEP-1992 Analyte Result Ut. RL Omits Calmat. Method 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE 1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE 1,2-DICHLOROPROPENE 1,4-DICHLORO-2-BOTENE(TOTAL) 1,4-DIFLDOROBENZENE 2-BOTANONE 2-CMLOROETHYLVINYL ETHER 2-HEXANONE - 4-BROMOFLOOROBENZENE 4 -METHYL -2 -PENTANONE ACETONE ACROLEIN ACRYLONITRILE BENZENE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE BROMOFORM BROMOMETHANE CARBON DISULFIDE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE CHLOROBENZENE CHLOROETHANE CHLOROFORM - CHLOROMETHANE CIS -1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE DIBR0M0METHANE DICHLORCDIPLOOROMETHANE ETHANOL ETHYL METHACRYLATE ETHYLBENZENE IODOMETHANE METHYLENE CHLORIDE STYRENE TETRACHLOROETHENE TOLUENE TRANS -I,2-DICHLOROETHENE TRANS -1.3 -DICHLOROPROPENE TRICHLOROETHENE TRICHLOROFLCOROMETHANE VINYL ACETATE VINYL CHLORIDE XYLENE(TOTAL) - • ND ND ND ND ND ND NA ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 'ND ND ND ND 4. ND ND ' ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 3.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 20.000 5.000 4.000 0.800 5.000 25.000 10.000 10.000 1.000 2.000 1.000 1.000 2.000 3.000 1.000 1.000 3.000 2.000 2.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 2.000 100.000 10.000 1.000 2.000 3.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 3,000 1.000 1.000 2.000 4.000 2.000 2.000 UG/L OG/L DG/Z. OG/L OG/L QG/L OG/L UG/L OG/L OG/L OG/L OG/L OG/L 00/1, OG/L OG/L UG/L DO/L OC/L OG/L OG/L DC/L OG/L OG/L OG/L 00/1, OC/L UG/L OG/L OG/L UG/L OG/L OG/L OG/L OG/L OG/L OG/L OC/L OG/L OG/L DG/L 00/L OG/L OG/L UG/I. ST PY PY PY PY - VOMSAAX424 V0MSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSDAX101 VOMSDAX101 V0MSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 V0MSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 V0MSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSDAX101 VOMSDAX101 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 V0MSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 V0MSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 V0MSAAX424 V0MSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 NA - Not Analyzed ND - Not Detected TBE - Trip Blank 931061 Site: 488 - Central Weld County Sanitary Landfill Weld County Road 271/2 Miliken CO 80543 NMI ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING LABORATORIES, INC CLIENT REPORT Sample Point: GWMNOI Sample Type: WELL sample Humber: AF2926 Page: S ENS: 92-11933 Sampled: 16-JUt-1992 MP: 488921 Received: 17-JUL-1992 REV: 00 Reported: 2-SEP-1992 Analyte Result Pan Units resets Method FM* DATA: DEPTH TO WATER FROM TOP OF CASING GROUNDWATER ELEV. PH FIELD PH FIELD PH FIELD PH FIELD SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD SPECIFIC CONDOCTANCE FIELD SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD WATER TEMPERATURE IN DEGREES CELSIUS WELL DEPTH TOTAL CHEMICAL METHODS & ROBOTICS: . _2S.Q7- 4811.10 7,42 7.40 7.38 7.36 3370. 3360. 3330. 3390. 12.5 34.37 `a FT FT MSL PR UNITS PH UNITS PA UNITS PH UNITS UAO1O5/Q1 OMROS/CM UIWOS/CM OM(OS/CM DEGREES C FT FDEDIVIC01 FDWGWELWDT FDPHQUADOI FDPHOUADOI TDPHOUA*O1 FDPHQUADO1 FDSPCONDO4 FDSPCOND04 FDSPCONDO4 £DSPCONDO4 FDXTEMPCO1 FDWGWELWDT ALKALINITY,BICARBONATE 429 10.000 MG/L CRALESXC01 ALKALINITY,CARBONATE ND 10.000 MG/L NO CRALKC0301 CHLORIDE 16.9 0.500 MG/L CRCHLORIO1 NITROGEN, AMMONIA NITROGEN, NITRATE ND 0.096 0.020 0.050 MG/L MG/L CRN2NH3X01 CRN03HYD01 SULFATE 1610 250.000 MG/L DL CRSOLFATOI INORGANICS: ARSENIC -DISSOLVED ND 10.000 OG/L INGFAADIAS BARIUM -DISSOLVED ND 200.000 CG/L INICPDXSBA CADMIUM -DISSOLVED ND 5.000 OG/L INICPDISCD CALCIUM -DISSOLVED 415000 5000.000 OG/L INICPDISCA CHROMIUM -DISSOLVED ND 10.000 OG/L INICPDISCR IRON -DISSOLVED ND 100.000 UG/L INICPDISFE LEAD -DISSOLVED ND 25.000 OG/L DL INGFAADIPB MAGNESIUM -DISSOLVED 254000 7250.000 UG/L DL INICPDISCG MANGANESE -DISSOLVED MERCURY -DISSOLVED ND ND 15.000 0.200 UG/L OG/L INICPOISMN INCVAADIHG POTASSIUM -DISSOLVED ND 5000.000 VG/L INFAADISXR SELENIUM -DISSOLVED ND 25.000 OG/L DL INGFAADISE SILVER -DISSOLVED ,ND 25.000 UC/L INICPDISCG SODIUM -DISSOLVED 78800 5000.000 UG/L INICPDISNA SUB -CONTRACT DATA: GROSS ALPHA 79 0.100 PCI/L +/- SBALPHBETA GROSS BETA RADIUM 226 RADIUM 226 -STANDARD DEVIATION RADIUM 228 RADIUM 228 -STANDARD DEVIATION STANDARD DEVIATION -GROSS ALPHA STANDARD DEVIATION -CROSS BETA SEMI -VOLATILE ORGANICS: 1.7 4.1 1.1 ND 2.3 38.6 33.6 0.100 0.100 0.100 PCl/L +/- PCX/L +/- PCX/L +/- PCI/L +/- PCl/L +/- PCl/L +/- PCI/L +1- SB SB SB SB SBALPHBETA SBRA226228 SBRA226228 SBRA226228 SBRA226228 SBALPHBETA SBALPHBETA 2.4-DICHLOROPHENOXYACETIC ACID ND 1.000 00/L SVGC2HRB01 2-(2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOXY)PROPIONIC ACID ND 1.000 UG/L SVGC2HRB01 ENDRIN LINDANE (GAMMA -BBC) METHOXYCHLOR TOXAPHENE ND ND ND ND 0.100 0.050 0.500 1.000 OWL 00/L C0/L OWL SVGC10CP01 SVGCIOCP01 SVGCIOCPOl SVGC10CP01 NA - Not Analyt ND - Not Detected TEE - Trip Blank Item Additional Comment Explanations (NQ/DL) ALKALINITY, CARBONATE SULFATE LEAD -DISSOLVED MAGNESIUM -DISSOLVED SELENIUM -DISSOLVED SBRA226228 CARBONATE ALKALINITY IS 0 MG/L BECAUSE SAMPLE PH < 8.3. Dilution factor 50 applied. Dilution factor 05 applied. Dilution factor 5 applied. Dilution factor 05 applied. CORE .. Aw a i.a. Site: 488 — Central Weld County Sanitary Landfill Weld County Road 271/2 Miliken CO 80543 ge4I ENVIRDMS6NTAL MONITORING LABORATORIES, INC CLIENT REPORT Sample Point: GWMWO1 Sample Type: WELL Sample Number: AF2926 Page: 6 ENS: 92-11933 Sampled: 16-JUL-1992 MP: 488921 Received: 17-JUL-1992 REV: 00 Reported: 2-SEP-1992 Analyte Result CC. RL Units Comments Method VOLATILE ORGANICS: 1.1.1-TRICHLOROETHANE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE - ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 1,1,2-TRICHL0R0ETHANE ND 1.000 UG/L VOMSAAX424 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE ND 3.000 UG/L VOMSAAX424 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE ND 2.000 OG/L . VOMSAAX424 1.2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE ND 2.000 OWL VOMSAAX424 1.2-DICHLOROETHANE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 1.4-DICHLORO-2-BOTENE(TOTAL) ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 1,4-DIFLOORO3ENZENE 2-BOTANONE NA ND 20.000 OG/L UG/I. V0MSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 2-CHLOROETHYLVINYL ETHER 2-HEXANONE 4-BROMOFLOOROBENZENE 4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE ACETONE ND ND ND ND ND 5.000 4.000 0.800 5.000 25.000 OG/L OG/L OG/L 0G/L 00/1 ST V0MSAAX424 V0M5AAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 ACROLEIN ND 10.000 UG/L PY VOMSDAX101 ACRYLONITRILE ND 10.000 OG/L PY VOMSDAX101 BENZENE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE BROMOOICHLOROMETHANE BROMOFORM ND ND ND ND 1.000 2.000 1.000 1.000 OG/L OG/L OG/L COIL VOMSAAAA4424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 BROMCMETHANE CARBON DISULFIDE ND ND 2.000 3.000 OG/L OG/L VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 CARBON TETRACHLORIDE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 CHLOROBENZENE CHLOROETHANE ND ND 1.000 3.000 OG/L OG/L - V0MSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 CHLOROFORM CHLOROMETHANE CIS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE' DIBROMOMETHANE DICHLOROOIFLUOROMETHANE ND ND ND ND ND ND 2.000 2.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 2.000 OG/L OG/L OG/L OG/L OG/L OG/L VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 V0MSAAX424 V0MSAAX424 V0MSAAX424 ETHANOL ND 100.000 OG/L PY VOMSDAX101 ETHYL METHACRYLATE ND 10.000 OG/L PY VOMSDAX101 ETHYLBENZENE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 IODOMETHANE METHYLENE CHLORIDE ND ND 2.000 3.000 OG/L UG/L VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424'.. STYRENE • TETRACHLOROETHENE ND ND 1.000 1'.000 OWL 0G/1. VOMSAAX424. VOMSAAX424. TOLUENE ND 1.000 OG/L VOM5AAX424. TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE - TRANS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE TRICHLOROETHENE TRICHLOROFLOOROMETMANE VINYL ACETATE ND ND ND ND ND 3.000 1.000 1.000 2,000 4.000 OG/L OG/L OG/L OG/L OG/L VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VINYL CHLORIDE XYLENE(TOTAL) ND ND 2.000 2.000 OG/L OG/L VOMSAAX424 V0MSAAX424 NA - Not Analyzed ND - Oct Detected TEE - Trip Blank 931061 Site: 488 — Central Weld County Sanitary Landfill Weld County Road 271/2 Miliken CO 80543 N4i ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING LABORATORIES. INC CLIENT REPORT Sample Point: GWMW02 Sample Type: WELL Sample Member: AF2934 Page: 7 ENS: 92-11933 Sampled: 20-JUL-1992 MP: 488921 Received: 21-JUL-1992 REV: 00 Reported: 2-SEP-1992 Anaiyte Result EM. RL Units Comments Method FIELD DATA: DEPTH TO WATER FROM TOP OF CASING GROUNDWATER ELEV. PH FIELD PH FIELD PH FIELD PH FIELD SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD WATER TEMPERATURE IN DEGREES CELSIUS WELL DEPTH TOTAL CHEMICAL METHODS L ROBOTICS: ,19�- C-6H 7.25 7.24 7.22 7.21 2520. 2520. 2550. 2600. 14.3 23.52 t FT FT Nfl. PH UNITS PH UNITS PH UNITS PH UNITS CMHOS/CM UMMOS/CM UMHOS/CM UMROS/CM DEGREES C FT FDNDTWtC01 FDWGWELWDT FDPHQOADO1 FDPHQUADOI FDPHQOADO1 FDPHQOADO1 FDSPCONDO4 FDSPCONDO4 FDSPCONDO4 FDSPCONDO4 FDXTEMPC01 FDWGWELWDT ALKALINITY,BICARBONATE 376 10.000 MG/L CRALABICO1 ALKALINITY,CARSONATE ND 10.000 MG/L CRALKc0301 CHLORIDE NITROGEN, AMMONIA 21.4 ND 0.500 0.020 MG/L MG/L CRCHLORIOI CRN2NH3X01 NITROGEN, NITRATE 15.9 0.500 MG/L DL . CRNO3H74D01 SULFATE 1190 100.000 MG/L DL CRSOLFATOI INORGANICS: ARSENIC -DISSOLVED ND 10.000 UG/L INGFPADIAS BARIUM -DISSOLVED ND 200.000 UG/L INICPDISBA CADMIUM -DISSOLVED ND 5.000 UC/L INICPOISCD CALCIUM -DISSOLVED CHROMIUM -DISSOLVED IRON -DISSOLVED 363000 ND ND 5000.000 10.000 100.000 OG/L 0G/L OG/L INZCPDISCA INICPOISCR INICPDISFE LEAD -DISSOLVED MAGNESIUM -DISSOLVED MANGANESE -DISSOLVED ND 127000 ND 5.000 5000.000 15.000 OG/I, nC/L UG/L INCFAADIPE INICPDISMG INICPDISY.SI MERCURY -DISSOLVED ND 0.200 VG/L INCVAADIHG POTASSIUM -DISSOLVED ND 5000.000 UG/L INFAADZSXK SELENIUM -DISSOLVED ND 25.000 OG/L DL INCFAADISE SILVER-OISSOLVED ND 25.000 VG/I. INICPDISAG SODIUM -DISSOLVED 107000 5000.000 UG/L INICPDISNA SOB -CONTRACT DATA: CROSS ALPHA CROSS BETA RADIUM 226 RADIUM 226 -STANDARD DEVIATION RADIUM 228 RADIUM 228 -STANDARD DEVIATION STANDARD DEVIATION -GROSS ALPHA STANDARD DEVIATION -GROSS BETA SEMI -VOLATILE ORGANICS: 26.1 31 3.9 1.1 ND 1.6 21.8 20.8 0.100 0.100 0.100 0.100 PCl/L +/- PCI/L +/- PCI/L +/- PCI/L +/- PCI/L +/- PCl/L +/- PCl/L +/- PCl/L +/- SB SB SB SB SBALPHBETA SBALPHBETA SBRA226228 S8RA226229 SBRA226228 SBRA226228 SBALPHBETA SBALPHBETA 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOXYACETIC ACID ND 1.000 OG/L SVCC2HR801 2-(2.4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOXY)PROPIONIC ACID ND 1.000 UG/L SVGC2HR301 ENDRIN ND 0.100 UC/L SVGC10CP01 LINDANE (GAMMA -SRC) METHOXYCHLOR TOXAPHENE ND ND ND 0.050 0.500 1.000 OC/L OC/L OG/L SVGC10CP01 SVGC10CP01 SVGC10CP01 NA - Not Analyzed ND - Not Detected 1BK - Trip Blank Item Additional Comment Ezplanatioaa (NO/DL) NITROGEN, NITRATE Dilution factor 10 applied. SULFATE Dilution factor 20 applied. SELENIUM -DISSOLVED Dilution factor 05 applied. SBRA226228 CORE SVGC2HRB01 THE LAD CONTROL STANDARD ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SAMPLE FAILED RECOVERY CRITERIA. a ... swat Site: 488 — Central Weld County Sanitary Landfill Weld County Road 271/2 Miliken CO 80543 NMI ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING LABORATORIES, INC CLIENT REPORT Sample Point: GWMW02 Sample Type: WELL Sample Number: AF2934 Page: 8 ENS: 92-11933 Sampled: 20-JOL-1992 MP: 488921 Received: 21-JOL-1992 REV: 00 Reported: 2-SEP-1992 Analyte Result Ma RL Units Comsat. Method VOLATILE ORGANICS: 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHENE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 1, 1,2, 2 -TETRACHLOROETHANE ND 2.000 00/L V0MSAAX424 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHENE ND 1.000 =ft VOMSAAX424 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE ND 3.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE ND 2.000 OC/L VOMSAAX424 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE ND 2.000 OC/L VOMSAAX424 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 1,4-DXCHLORO-2-BOTENE(TOTAL) ND 2.000 DO/L V0MSAAX424 1,4-DIFLOOROBENZENE 2-BOTANONE NA ND 20.000 OC/L OC/L V0MSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 2-CHLOROETHYLVINYL ETHER ND 5.000 OC/L ST VOMSAAX424 2-HEXANONE ND 4.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 4-BROMOFLOOROBENZENE ND 0.800 OC/L VOMSAAX424 4 -METHYL -2 -PENTANONE ND 5.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 ACETONE ND 25.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 ACROLEIN ND 10.000 00/L VOMSDAX101 ACRYLONITRILE ND 10.000 DC/L VOMSDAX101 BENZENE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 BROMOCHLOROMETHANE ND 2.000 DC/L V0MSAAXI:24 BROMODICHLOROMETHANE ND 1.000 OC/L - VOMSAAX424 BROMOFORM ND 1.000 DG/L VOMSAAX424 BROMOMETHANE ND 2.000 OG/L V0MSAAX424 CARSON DISULFIDE ND 3.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 CARBON TETRACHLORIDE ND 1.000 CC/L VOMSAAX424 CHLOROBENZENE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 CHLOROETHANE ND 3.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 CHLOROFORM ND 2.000 OC/L VOMSMX424 CHLCROMETHANE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE ND 1.000 DC/L VOMSMX424 DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 DIBROMOMETHANE ND 1.000 00/1. VOMSAAX424 DICHLORODIFLOOROMETHANE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 ETHANOL ND 100.000 DG/L VOMSDAX101 ETHYL METHACRYLATE ND 10.000 OG/L VOMSDAX101 ETHYLBENZENE ND 1.000 OG/L VONSAAX424 IODOMETHANE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSMX424 METHYLENE CHLORIDE ND 3.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 STYRENE ND 1.000 0G/L VOMSAAX424 TETRACHLOROETHENE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 TOLUENE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 TRANS -1,2-DYCHLOROETHENE ND 3.000 00/L VOMSAAX424 TRANS -1,3 -0XCHLOROPROPENE ND 1.000 OG/L - VOMSAAX424 TRICHLOROETHENE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 TRICHLOROFLOOROMETHANE" ND 2.000 OO/L VOMSAAX424 VINYL ACETATE ND 4.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 VINYL CHLORIDE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 XYLENE(TOTAL) ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 NA - Not Analyzed ND - Not Detected THE - Trip Blank 931061 Page: 9 NMI ENVIRONllNTAL MONITORING LABORATORIES, INC CLIENT REPORT Site: 488 - Central Weld County Sanitary Landfill Weld County Road 271/2 Miliken CO 80543 Sample Point: GWMWO3 Sample Type: WELL Sample Number: AF2924 ENS: 92-11933 Sampled: 15-JUL-1992 107: 488921 Received: 16-JOL-1992 REV: 00 'sported: 2-SEP-1992 Analyte Result Sat RL Units Comments Method CHEMICAL METHODS i ROBOTICS; ALKALINITY,BICARBONATE 206 10.000 MG/L CRALR8XC01 ALKALINXTY,CARBONATE ND 10.000 MC/L NO CRALKC0301 CHLORIDE 76.9 0.500 MG/L CRCHLORI01 NITROGEN, AMMONIA ND 0.020 MG/L CRN2NH3X01 NITROGEN, NITRATE 8.13 0.300 MC/L DL CRNO3HYDOI SULFATE 3010 100.000 MG/L DL CRSULFATO1 INORGANICS: ARSENIC -DISSOLVED ND 10.000 DC/L INGFAADIAS BARIUM -DISSOLVED ND 200.000 UG/L INICPDISBA CADM!JM-DISSOLVED ND 5.000 UG/L INXCPDISCD CALLIUM-DISSOLVED 461000 5000.000 UG/L INXCPDISCA CHI.OMIUM-DISSOLVED ND 10.000 UG/L INICPDISCR IRON -DISSOLVED ND 100.000 DG/L INICPDISFE LEAD -DISSOLVED ND 25.000 DG/L DL INGFAADIPB MAGNESIUM -DISSOLVED ND 7250.000 UG/L DL INICPDISMC MANGANESE -DISSOLVED ' ND 15.000 OG/L INICPDISAN MERCURY -DISSOLVED ND 0.200 UG/L INCVAADIHG POTASSIUM -DISSOLVED 9980 5000.000 UG/L INFAADCSXK SELENIUM -DISSOLVED ND 50.000 UG/L DL INGFAADI5E SILVER -DISSOLVED ND 25.000 OG/L INICPDISAG SODIUM -DISSOLVED 221000 5000.000 OG/L INICPDISAA SUB -CONTRACT DATA: CROSS ALPHA 62.3 0.100 PCl/L +1- SBALPHBETA CROSS BETA 27.8 0.100 PCI/L +/- SBALPHBETA RADIUM 226 RADIUM 226 -STANDARD DEVIATION 8.4 1.5 0.100 PCl/L 4/- PCl/L +/- 58 SB 58RA226228 SBRA226228 RADIUM 228 2.8 0.100 PCl/L +/- SB SBRA226228 RADIUM 228 -STANDARD DEVIATION 1.8 PCI/L +/- SB 5BRA226228 STANDARD DEVIATION -GROSS ALPHA 37.1 PCl/L 4./- SBALPHBETA STANDARD DEVIATION -GROSS BETA • 31.8 PCl/L +/- SBALPHBETA SEMI -VOLATILE ORGANICS: 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOXYACETIC ACID 2-(2,4,5-TRICHLOROPNENOXY)PROPIONIC ACID ND ND 1.000 1.000 DC/I. OC/L SVGC2HRBO. SVGC2HRB01 ENORIN ND 0.100 COIL SVGCIOCPO1 LINDANE (GAMMA-BHC) ND 0.050 UG/L SVGCIOCP01 METHOXYCHLOR ND 0.500 DG/L SVGC10CP01 TOXAPHENE ND 1.000 UG/L SVCC1OCP01 VOLATILE ORGANICS: 1.1.1-TRICHLOROETHANE NO 2.000 UG/L VOMSAAX424 1.1,2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE NO 2.000 UG/L VOM5AAX424 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHA'E ND 1.000 UG/L V0MSAAX424 1,1-OICHLOROETHANE ND 3,000 00/L V0MSAAX424 1,1-OICHLOROETHENE ND 2.000 DG/L VOMSAAX424 1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE ND 2,000 OC/L VOMSAAX424 1,2-OICHLOROETHAVE ND 2.000 UG/L VOMSAAX424 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 1,4 -DICHLORO -2 -BOTENE(TOTAL) ND 2.000 UG/L VOMSAAX424 1,4-DIFLUOROBENZENE NA OC/L VOMSAAX424 2-SUTANONE ND 20.000 OC/L VOMSAAX424 2-CHLOROETHYLVINYL ETHER ND • 5.000 UG/L ST VOMSAAX424 NA - Not Analyzed ND - Sot Detected TSR a Trip Blank Item Additional Comment Explanation* (MO/DL) ALKALINITY, CARBONATE NITROGEN, NITRATE SULFATE LEAD -DISSOLVED MAGNESIUM -DISSOLVED SELENIUM -DISSOLVED SBRA226228 CARBONATE ALKALINITY IS 0 MC/L BECAUSE SAMPLE PH t 8.3. Dilution factor 10 applied. Dilution factor 20 applied. Dilution factor 5 applied. Dilution factor 5 applied. Dilution factor 10 applied. CORE an as /61 Site: 488 - Central Weld County Sanitary Landfill Weld County Road 271/2 Miliken CO 80543 NMX ENVIRONMENTAL MDMITORING LABORATORIES, INC CLIENT REPORT Sample Point: GWMWO3 Sample Type; WELL Sample Number; AF2924 Page: 10 S83: 92-11933 Sampled: 15 -JCL 1992 Mt: 488921 Received: 16-JOL-1992 R)V: 00 Reported: 2-SEP-1992 Analyte Result EMA. RL Units Co -meets Method 2-HEXANONE ND 4.000 UG/L VOMSAAX424 4-BROMOFLOOROBENZENE ND 0.800 OG/L VOMSAAX424 4 -METHYL -2 -PENTANONE ND 5.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 ACETONE ND 25.000 UG/L VOMSAAX424 ACROLEIN ND 10.000 OG/L PY VOMSDAX101 ACRYLONITRILE ND 10.000 OG/L PY VOMSDAX101 BENZENE ND 1.000 UG/L VOM'AAX424 BROMOCHLOROMETHANE ND 2.000 00/L VOMSAAX424 BROMODICHLOROMETHANE ND 1.000 CC/L V0MSAAX424 HROMOFORM NO 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 BROMOMETHANE ND 2.000 UG/L VOMSAAX424 CARBON DISULFIDE ND 3.000 0G/L V0MSAAX424 CARBON TETRACHLORIDE ND 1.000 00/L VOMSAAX424 CHLOROBENZENE NO 1.000 00/L V0MSAAX424 CHLOROETHANE ND 3.000 0G/L VOMSAAX424 CHLOROFORM ND 2.000 0G/L VOMSAAX424 CHLOROMETHANE ND 2.000 UG/L VOMSAAX424 CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE ND 1.000 CO/L VOMSAAX424 DIBROMOMETHANE ND 1.000 00/1 VOMSAAX424 DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE ND 2.000 OGIL VOMSAAk424 ETHANOL ND 100.000 0G/L PY VOMSDAX101 ETHYL METRACRYLATE ND 10.000 CG/L PY VOMSDAX101 ETHYLBENZENE ND 1.000 0G/L VOMSAAX424 IODOMETHANE ND 2.000 0G/L VOMSAAX424 METHYLENE CHLORIDE ND 3.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 STYRENE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 TETRACHLOROETHENE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 TOLUENE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 TRANS -1,2 -DICHLOROETHENE ND 3.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 TRANS -I,3-DICHLOROPROPENE NO 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 TRICHLOROETHENE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE ND 2.000 0G/L V0MSAAX424 VINYL ACETATE. ND 4.000 0G/L VOMSAAX424 VINYL CHLORIDE ND 2.000 00/L V0MSAAX424 XYLENE(TOTAL) ' ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 NA - Not Analyzed ND - Not Detected TBE - Trip Blank 931061 Site: 488 — Central Weld County Sanitary Land:ill Weld County Road 271/2 Miliken CO 80543 �R ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING LABORATORIES, INC CLIENT REPORT Sample Point: GWMWO3 Sample Type: WELL Sample Number: AF2924 Page: 11 ENS: 92-11933 Sampled: 1S -JCL -1992 MP: 488921 Received: 29-JUL-1992 REV: 00 Reported: 2-SEP-1992 Analyte Revolt EML RL Dolts Comments Method FIELD DATA: DEPTH TO WATER FROM TOP OF CASING ��L FT FDWDTWTC01 GROUNDWATER ELEV. 4789. 4 FT MSL FDWGWELWDT PH FIELD 7.45 PH UNITS FDPHQCADOI PH FIELD 7.45 PH UNITS FDPHQOADO1 PH FIELD 7.45 PR UNITS FDPHQUADOI PH FIELD 7.44 PH UNITS FDPHQUADO1 SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD 4730. CMOS/CM FDSPCONDO4 SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD 4780. CMHOS/CM FDSPCONDO4 SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD 4750. UMIOS/CM FDSPCONDO4 SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD 4700. UMiOS/CM FOSPCONDO4 WATER TEMPERATURE IN DEGREES CELSIUS 16.7 DEGREES C FDXTEMPC01 WELL DEPTH TOTAL 29.86 FT FDWGWELWDT NA - Not Analyzed ND - Not Detected TEE - Trip Blank a 931061 Site: 488 — Central Weld County Sanitary Landfill Weld County Road 271/2 Miliken CO 80543 1!Q ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING LABORATORIES, INC CLIENT REPORT Sample Point: GMMW04 Sample Type: WELL Sample NAmtber: AF2935 Page: 12 ENS;. 92-11933 Sampled: 20-JUL-1992 MP: 488921 Received: 21-JUL-1992 REV: 00 Reported: 2-SEP-1992 Analyte Result IAN. RL Units Comments Method FIELD DATA: DEPTH TO WATER FROM TOP or CASING GROUNDWATER ELEV. PH FIELD PH FIELD PH FIELD PH FIELD SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD WATER TEMPERATURE IN DEGREES CELSIUS WELL DEPTH TOTAL CHEMICAL METHODS i ROBOTICS: 1,1 i 4745.41 7.45 7.45 7.40 7.38 5850. 5830. 5870. 5870. 16.5 23.34 FT FT MSL PH UNITS PH UNITS PH UNITS PH UNITS UMI(03/CM OMMOS/CM U19(OS/CM 0MH0S/CM DEGREES C FT - FDWDTWIC01 FOWGWELWDT FDPH00ADO1 FDPHQOADO1 FDPHQOADO1 FDPMQUADOI FDSPCONDO4 FD5PCONDO4 FDSPCONDO4 FDSPCONDO4 FDXTEMPC01 FDWGWELWDT ALXALINITY,BICARBONATE 502 10,000 MG/L CRALXBIC01 ALXALINITY,CARBONATE ND 10.000 MG/L CRALXC0301 CHLORIDE 61.6 0.500 MG/L CRCHLORI01 NITROGEN, AMMONIA ND 0.020 MG/L CRN2NH3X01 NITROGEN, NITRATE ND 0.050 MO/L CRNO3HYD01 SULFATE 3890 100.000 14G/L OL CRSULFATO1 INORGANICS: ARSENIC -DISSOLVED ND 10.000 CG/L INGFAADIAS BARIUM -DISSOLVED ND 200.000 GG/L IN:CPDZSBA CADMIUM -DISSOLVED ND 5.000 UG/L INICPDISND CALCIUM -DISSOLVED 463000 5000.000 UG/L INICPDISCA CHROMIUM -DISSOLVED ND 10.000 OG/L INICPDISCR IRON -DISSOLVED ND 100,000 UG/L INICPDI5FE LEAD -DISSOLVED ND 25.000 OG/L DL INOFAADIPB MAGNESIUM -DISSOLVED 4564000' 5000.000 OG/L INICPDZSMC MANGANESE -DISSOLVED aI0207 15.000 OG/L INICPDISMN MERCURY -DISSOLVED ND 0.200 0G/L INCVAADIHG POTASSIUM -DISSOLVED ND 5000.000 UG/L INFAADISXX SELENIUM -DISSOLVED ND 25.000 OG/L OL INGFAADISE SILVER -DISSOLVED ND 25.000 UG/L INICPDISNG SODIUM -DISSOLVED 447000 5000.000 OG/L INICPDISNA SUB -CONTRACT DATA: GROSS ALPHA 140 0.100 PCI/L +/- SBlLPMBETA CROSS BETA ND 0.100 PCl/L +/- SBALPHBETA RADIUM 226 2.7 0.100 PCl/L +/- SB 3BRA226228 RADIUM 226 -STANDARD DEVIATION 1 PCI/L +/- SB SBRA226228 RADIUM. 228 ND 0.100 PCl/L +/- SB 58RA226228 RADIUM 228 -STANDARD DEVIATION STANDARD DEVIATION -GROSS ALPHA STANDARD DEVIATION -GROSS BETA SEMI -VOLATILE ORGANICS: 1.6 55.7 42.6 PCI/L +/- PCl/L +/- PCI/L +/- SB 58RA226228 SBALPHBETA SBALPHBETA 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOXYACETIC ACID ND 1.000 OG/L SVGC2HRB01 2-(2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOXY)PROPIONZC ACID ND 1.000 UG/L SVCC2HRB01 ENDRIN ND 0.100 -00/L SVGC1OCP01 LINDANE (GAMMA -SRC) ND 0.050 OG/L SVGCIOCP01 METHOXYCHLOR ND 0,500 UG/L SVGC10CP01 TOXAPHENE ND 1.000 OG/L SVCC10CP01 NA + Not Analyzed ND + Not Detected TBX + Trip Blank Item Additional Calmat Explanations (NQ/DL) SULFATE LEAD -DISSOLVED SELENIUM -DISSOLVED 58RA226228 SVGC2HRB01 Dilution factor 20 applied. Dilution factor 05 applied. Dilution factor 05 applied. CORE THE LAB CONTROL STANDARD ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SAMPLE FAILED RECOVERY CRITERIA. A ^ - A l.� le/ Siteentral Weld County Sanitary Landfill Weld County Road 271/2 Miliken CO 80543 4NR ENVIROtl4ENTAL MONITORING LABORATORIES, INC CLIENT REPORT Sample Point: GWMW04 Sample Type: WELL Sample Number: AF2935 Page: 13 ENS: 92-11933 Sampled: 20 -JCL -1992 44P: 488921 Reeela«i: 21 -JCL -1992 REV: 00 Reported: 2-SEP-1992 Analyte Result E4G, RL Units Comments Method VOLATILE ORGANICS: 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 1.1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE ND 1.000 OC/L VOMSAAX424 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE ES.► 3.000 CG/L VOMSAAX424 1.1-DICHLOROETHENE NO 2.000 UG/L V0MSAAX424 1.2,3-TRICHL0R0PROPANE ND 2.000 OC/L VOMSAAX424 1.2-DICHLOROETHANE c36.7 2.000 DO/L VOMSAAX424 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE ND 2.000 OG/I, VOMSAAX424 1,4-DICHLOR0-2-BUTENE(TOTAL) 1,4-DIFLOOROBENZENE 2-BOTANONE NO NA ND 2.000 20,000 OG/L OG/I, OWL VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 2-CHLOROETHYLVINYL ETHER ND 5.000 00/L ST VOMSAAX424 2-HEXANONE ND 4.000 OC/L V0MSAAX424 4-BROMOFLOOROBENZENE ND 0.800 0G/L VOMSAAX424 4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE ND 5.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 ACETONE ND 25.000 =it VOMSAAX424 ACROLEIN ND 10.000 OG/L PY VOMSDAX101 ACRYLONITRILE ND 10.000 Dolt PY VOMSDAX101 BENZENE ND 1.000 00/L VOMSAAX424 BROMOCHLOROMETHANE ND 2.000 OWL VOMSAAXW24 BROMODICRLOROMETHANE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 BROMOFORM ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 BROMOMETHANE ND 2.000 UG/L VOMSAAX424 CARBON DISOLFIDE ND 3.000 00/L VOMSAAX424 CARBON TETRACHLORIDE ND 1.000 00/L VOMSAAX424 CHLOROBENZENE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 CHLOROETHANE ND 3.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 CHLOROFORM ND 2.000 CG/L VOMSAAX424 CHLOROMETHANE ND 2.000 OWL VOMSAAX424 CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 DIBR0M0CHL0R0METHANE ND 1.000 0G/L VOMSAAX424 DIBROMOMETHANE ND 1.000 00/L VOMSAAX424 DICHLORODIFL^7OROMETHANE It- 2.000 0O/1 V0MSAAX424 ETHANOL ND 100.000 OWL PY VOMSDAX101 ETHYL METHACRYLATE ND 10.000 OG/L PY VOMSDAX101 ETHYLBENZENE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 IODOMETHANE ND 2.000 OWL V0MSAAX424 METHYLENE CHLORIDE ND 3.000 0G/L VOMSAAX424 STYRENE NIiDD,,,, 1.000 7G/L VOMSAAX424 TETRACHLOROETHENE X3 5 1.000 QG/L VOMSAAX424 TOLUENE ND - 1.000 0O/L VOMSAAX424 TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE ND 3.000 OG/I, VOMSAAX424 TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE ND 1.000 oG/L VOMSAAX424 TRICHLOROETHENE crime 1.000 0G/L VOMSAAX424 TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE ND 2.000 00/L VOMSAAX424 VINYL ACETATE ND 4.000 0G/L VOMSAAX424 VINYL CHLORIDE ND 2.000 00/L VOMSAAX424 XYLENE(TOTAL) ND 2.000 UG/I, VOMSAAX424 - Not Analyze ND - Not Detected TBE - Trip Blank 931061 149 Sitentral Weld County Sanitary Landfill Weld County Road 271/2 Miliken CO 80543 1!Q ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING LABORATORIES, INC CLIENT REPORT Sample Point: GWMWO5 Sample Type: WELL Sample Number: AF2936 ENS: 92-11933 MP: 488921 REV: 00 Page: 14 Sampled: 21-JOL-1992 Received: 22-„7UL-1992 Reported: 2-SEP-1992 Analyte Result FIELD DATA: DEPTH TO WATER FROM TOP OF CASINO GROUNDWATER ELEV. PH FIELD PH FIELD PH FIELD PH FIELD SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD WATER TEMPERATURE IN DEGREES CELSIUS WELL DEPTH TOTAL CHEMICAL METHODS L ROBOTICS: ALXALINITY, BICARBONATE ALXALINITY, CARBONATE CHLORIDE NITROGEN, NITROGEN, SULFATE An'ONIA NITRATE INORGANICS: ARSENIC -DISSOLVED BARIUM -DISSOLVED CADMIUM -DISSOLVED CALCIUM -DISSOLVED CHROMIUM -DISSOLVED IRON -DISSOLVED LEAD -DISSOLVED MAGNESIUM -DISSOLVED MANGANESE -DISSOLVED MERCURY -DISSOLVED POTASSIUM -DISSOLVED SELENIUM -DISSOLVED SILVER -DISSOLVED SODIUM -DISSOLVED SUB -CONTRACT DATA: GROSS ALPHA GROSS BETA RADIUM 226 -RADIUM 226 -STANDARD DEVIATION RADIUM 228 RADIUM 228 -STANDARD DEVIATION STANDARD DEVIATION -GROSS ALPHA STANDARD DEVIATION -GROSS BETA SEMI -VOLATILE ORGANICS: 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOXYACETIC ACID 2-(2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOXY)PROPIONIC ACID ENDRIN LINDANE (GAMMA-BHC) METHOXYCHLOR TOXAPHENE Item NA - Not Analyzed% elisr 4776k.63s` 7.04 7.04 6.98 6,96 5360. 5370. 5400. 5440. 17.5 28.30 560 ND 28.3 ND 0.84 4030 ND ND ND 511000 ND ND ND .4594000' aD:9-nf ND 10700 ND ND 249000 47.2 85.8 4.8 0.9 3.2 1.4 56.4 39.3 ND ND ND ND ND ND EMU, RL Units' Comments Method 10.000 10.000 0.500 0.020 0.050 250.000 10.000 200.000 5.000 5000.000 10.000 100.000 25.000 7250.000 15.000 0.200 5000.000 25.000 25.000 5000.000 0.100 0.100 0.100 0.100 1.000 1.000 0.100 0.050 0.500 1.000 ND - Not Detected FT FT MSL PH UNITS PH ONITS PE UNITS PR UNITS U*OS/Q4 OMBOS/CM UMHOS/CM UM10S/CM DEGREES C FT MC/L MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L Mc/L UC/L UG/L UG/L UC/L OG/L 4G/L UC/L 0G/L UC/L OC/L OC/L UC/L OC/L OC/L PCI/L +/- PCI/L +/- PCI/L +1- PCI/L +/- PCl/L +/- PCI/L +/- PCI/L +1- PCI/L +/- UG/L OC/L OWL OWL UC/L Uc/L NQ DL DL DL DL SB SB SB SB i FDW^TWTC01 FDWGWELNUT FDPHQOADOI FDPHQUADOI FDPHQUADOI FDPHQOADO1 FDSPCONDO4 FDSPCONDO4 FDSPCONDO4 FDSPCOND04 FDXTEMPC01 FDWGWELWDT CRALEBIC01 CRALHC0301 CRCHLORIOI CRN2NH3X01 CRN03HYD01 ORSOLFATO1 INCFAADIA5 INICPDISBA INICPDISCD ZNICPDISCA INICPDISCR INICPDISFE INGFAADIPB INICPDI5MG INICPDISMN INCVAADIHG INFAADISXX INGFAADISE INICPDISAG INICPOISNA SBALPNBETA SBALPHBETA SBRA226228 SSRA226228 5BRA226228 S8RA226228 SBALPHBETA SBALPHBETA SVGC2HRB01 SVCC2HRfo1 SVGCIOCPo1 SVGC1OCP01 SVCC10CP01 SVCCIOCP01 THE - Trip Blank ALXALINITY, CARBONATE SULFATE LEAD -DISSOLVED MAGNESIUM -DISSOLVED SELENIUM -DISSOLVED S8RA226228 Additional Comment Explanations (Ng/DL) CARBONATE ALEALINITY IS 0 MG/L BECAUSE SAMPLE PH < 8.3. Dilution factor 50 applied. Dilution factor 05 applied. Dilution. factor 5 applied. Dilution factor 05 applied. CORE 931061 an ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING LABORATORIES, INC CLIENT REPORT Site: 488 — Central Weld County Sanitary Landfill Weld County Road 271/2 Miliken CO 80543 Sample Point: CWMW05 Sample Type: WELL Simple Number: AF2936 ENS: 92-11933 Sampled: 21 -JCL -:992 NP: 488921 Received: 22 -JCL -:992 REV: 00 Reported: 2-SEP-:992 Analyte Result RQII. RI. Onits Comments method VOLATILE ORGANICS: 1.1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE ND 4.000 CG/L VOMSAAX424 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ND 4.000 CG/L VOMSAAX424 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE ND 2.000 CG/L VOMSAAX424 1,1-DICHLOROETPLANE att. 6.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE ND 4.000 00/1. VOMSAAX424 1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE ND 4.000 DG/L V0MSAAX424 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE ND 4.000 OG/L V0MSAAX424 1,2-DICHLORCPROPANE L;92 4.000 CG/L V0MSAAX424 1,4-DICHLORO-2-BCTENE(TOTAL) ND 4.000 CG/L VOMSAAX424 1,4-DIFLCOROBENZENE 2-BCTANONE 0 - ND 40.000 OG/L CG/L VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 2-CHLOROETHYLVINYL ETHER ND 10.000 CC/L ST V0MSAAX424 2-HEXANONE ND 3.000 CG/L VOMSAAX424 4-BROMOFLCOROBENZENE ND 1.600 CG/L VOMSAAX424 4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE ND 10.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 ACETONE ND 50.000 CO/L VOMSAAX424 ACROLEIN ND 10.000 OG/L PY VOMSDAX101 ACRYLONITRILE ND 10.000 CG/1, PY VOMSDAX101 BENZENE ND 2.000 CG/L VOMSAAX424 BRCMOCHLORCMETHANE ND 4.000 COIL VOMSAAA4424 BROMODICHLOROMETHANE ND 2.000 CO/I. VOMSAAX424 BROMOFORM ND 2.000 CG/L VOMSAAX424 BROMOMETHANE ND 4.000 CG/L VOMSAAX424 CARBON D:SDLF:DE ND 6.000 CG/L VOMSAAX424 CARBON TETRACHLORIDE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 CHLOROBENZENE ND 2.000 CG/L VOMSAAX424 CHLOROETNANE ND 6.000 CG/L vOMSAAX424 CHLOROFORM ND 4.000 CO/L VOMSAAX424 CHLOROMETMANE ND 4.000 CO/L VOMSAAX424 CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE - ND 2.000 CG/L VOMSAAX424 DIBROMOCHL0R0METHANE ND 2.000 CG/L VOMSAAX424 DIBROMOMETHANE ND 2.000 CG/L VOMSAAX424 DICHLORODIFLCORCMETHANE `6.-" 4.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 ETHANOL ND 100.000 CG/L PY VOMSDAX101 ETHYL METHACRYLATE ND 10.000 CG/L PY VOMSDAX101 ETHYLBENZENE ND 2.000 OG/L V0MSAAX424 IODOMETHANE ND 4.000 OG/L V0MSAAX424 METHYLENE CHLORIDE ND 6.000 CG/L V0MSAAX424 STYRENE ND 2.000 CG/L VOMSAAX424 TETRACHLOROETHENE '230th 2.000 CG/1, VOMSAAX424 TOLUENE ND 2.000 CG/L VOMSAAX424 TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE ND 6.000 00/L V0MSAAX424 TRANS-I,3-DICHLOROPROPENE ND 2.000 CG/L VOMSAAX424 TRICHLOROETHENE TRICHLOROFLCOROMETHANE x.86.# ND 2.000 4.000 CG/L CO/L VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VINYL ACETATE ND 8.000 CG/L VOMSAAX424 VINYL CHLORIDE ND 4.000 CG/I. VOMSAAX424 XYLENE(TOTAL) ND 4.000 CG/L V0MSAAX424 NA - Not Analyzed ND - Not Detected TBE - Trip Blank Item Additional Comment Explanations (NO/DLI VOMSAAX424 Dilution factor 2.00 applied. 931061 Site: 488 — Central Weld County Sanitary Landfill Weld County Road 271/2 Miliken CO 80543 NMI ENVIRONMENTAL MDNITORING LABORATORIES, INC CLIENT REPORT Sample Point: GWMW5N Sample Type: WELL Sample Number: AF2939 Page: 1S ENS: 92-11933 Sampled: 21 -JCL -D92 MP: 488921 Received: 23 -JUG 1992 REV: 00 Reported: 2-SEP-1992 Analyte Result ElC. RL Units Comments Method FIELD DATA:.. - DEPTH TO WATER FROM TOP OF CASING GROUNDWATER ELEV. !Inv. %4 4738'n' ) FT FT MSL FDWDTWTC01 FDWGWELWDT PH FIELD 6,70 PH UNITS FDPH0CAD01 PH FIELD 6.69 PH UNITS FDPHOQADO1 PH FIELD 6.69 PH UNITS FDPHOOADOI PH FIELD 6.65 PH UNITS FDPHQDADO1 SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD 5520. OM(OS/CM FDSPCONDO4 SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD 5510. UMHOS/CM FDSPCONDO4 SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD 5500. UMHOS/CM FOSPCONDO4 SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD 5490. UM(OS/CM FOSPCONDO4 WATER TEMPERATURE IN DEGREES CELSIUS 18.8 DEGREES C FDXTEMPC01 WELL DEPTH TOTAL 30.83 FT FDWCWELWDTT CHEMICAL METHODS c ROBOTICS: ALKALINITY,BICARBONATE 682 10.000 MG/L CRALABICOI ALXALINITY,CARBONATE ND 10.000 MG/L NO CRALKC0301 CHLORIDE 24.5 0.500 MG/L CRCHLOR:O1 NITROGEN, AMMONIA ND 0.020 MO/L CRN2NMJXCI NITROGEN, NITRATE 0.25 0.050 MG/L CRN03HY001 SULFATE 3900 250.000 MG/L DL CRSOLFATO1 INORGANICS: ARSENIC -DISSOLVED ND 10.000 UC/L INGFAADIAS BARIUM -DISSOLVED ND 200.000 UO/L INICPDISAA CADMIUM -DISSOLVED ND 5.000 OG/L INICPDISCO CALCIUM -DISSOLVED 484000 5000.000 OG/L INICPDISCA CHROMIUM -DISSOLVED 12.3 - 10.000 OG/L INICPDISCR IRON -DISSOLVED ND 100.000 UG/L INICPDISFE LEAD -DISSOLVED ND 25.000 0G/L DL INGFAADIPB MAGNESIUM -DISSOLVED 46730001P 7250.000 OG/L DL INICPDISMG MANGANESE -DISSOLVED -238 7 15.000 OG/L INIOPD:SMN MERCURY -DISSOLVED ND 0.200 UG/L INCVAADIHG POTASSIUM -DISSOLVED 10200 5000.000 DG/L INFAADISXX SELENIUM -DISSOLVED ND 25.000 OG/L DL INGFAADISE SILVER -DISSOLVED NO 25.000 CG/L INICPDISAC SODIUM -DISSOLVED 271000 5000.000 UG/L INICPDISAA sus -CONTRACT DATA: GROSS ALPHA 66.7 0.100 PCI/L +/- SBALPHSETA GROSS BETA 55.8 0.100 PCl/L +/- SBALPHBETA RADIUM 226 ND 0.100 PCl/L +/- SB SBRA226228 RADIUM 226 -STANDARD DEVIATION 0.4 PCl/L +/- 5B SBRA226228 RADIUM 228 3.5 0,100 PCl/L +/- SB SBRA226228 RADIUM 228 -STANDARD DEVIATION 1.4 PCX/L +/- SB SBRA226228 STANDARD DEVIATION -GROSS ALPHA 44.5 PCI/L +/- SBALPHBETA STANDARD DEVIATION -GROSS BETA 26.1 PCI/L +/- SBALPHEETA SEMI -VOLATILE ORGANICS: 2,4-OICHLOROPHENOXYACETIC ACID ND 1.000 UG/L SVGC2HRB0I 2-(2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOXY)PROPIONIC ACID ND 1.000 OG/L SVCC2HRB01 ENDRIN ND 0.100 OC/L SVCCIOCP01 LINDANE (GAMMA-BHC) ND 0.050 CC/L SVCC10CP01 METHOXYCHLOR ND 0.500 CO/L SVCCIOCP0/ TOXAPHENE NO 1.000 UG/L SVGC10CP0/ NA - Not Analyzed ND - Not Detected TBE - Trip Blank Item Additional Can snt Explanations (NQ/DL) ALKALINITY, CARBONATE SULFATE LEAD -DISSOLVED MAGNESIUM -DISSOLVED SELENIUM -DISSOLVED SBRA226228 CARBONATE ALXALINTY 0 MG/L BECAUSE SAMPLE PH <8.3 Dilution factor 50 applied. Dilution factor 05 applied. Dilution factor 5 applied. Dilution factor 05 applied. CORE -- (141419tell--- Site: 488 — Central Weld County Sanitary Landfill Weld County Road 271/2 Miliken CO 80543 1m4I ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING LABORATORIES, INC CLIENT REPORT Sample Point: GWMW5N Sample Type: WELL Sample Number: AF2939 Page: 36 ENS: 92-11933 sampled: 21-JXL 1992 MP: 488921 Received: 23-JOL-1992 REV: 00 Reported: 2-SEP-1992 Analyte Result EMC AL Units Coats Method VOLATILE ORGANICS: 1,1.1-TRICHLOROETHANE ND 8.000 DG/1 VOMSAAX424 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ND 8.000 CG/L VOMSAAX424 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE ND 4.000 OG/L V0MSAAX424 ' 1-DICHLOROETHANE rIT.e. 12.000 DG/L VOMSAAX424 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE ND 8.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE ND 8.000 00/L VOMSAAX424 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE ND 8.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE "!16.V 8.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 1,4-DICHLOR0-2-B0TENE(TOTAL) NO 8.000 O0/L VOMSAAX424 1,4-DIFLCOROBENZENE 2-B0TANONE NA ND 80.000 OG/L 00/1 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 2-CHL0ROETHYLVINYL ETHER ND 20.000 CG/L ST VOMSAAX424 2-HEXANONE ND 16.000 CC/L VOMSAAX424 4-BROMOFLOOR08ENZENE ND 3.200 CG/L VOMSAAX424 4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE ND 20.000 COIL VOMSAAX424 ACETONE ND 100.000 CG/L V0M5AAX424 ACROLEIN ND 10.000 OG/L PY VOMSDAX101 ACRYLONITRILE ND 10.000 CG/L PY VOMSDAX101 BENZENE ND 4.000 DG/L VOMSAAX424 BROM0CHL0ROMETHANE ND 8.000 CG/L VOMSAAX424 BROMODICHLOROMETHANE ND 4.000 CC/L VOMSAAX424 BROMOFOPM ND 4,000 COIL VOMSAAX424 BROMOMETHANE ND 8.000 CO/L V0MSAAX424 CARBON DISULFIDE ND 12.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 CARBON TETRACHLORIDE ND 4.000 0G/L VOMSAAX424 CHLOROBENZENE ND 4.000 CG/L VOMSAAX424 CHLOROETHANE ND 12.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 CHLOROFORM ND 8.000 US/L VOMSAAX424 CHLOROMETMANE ND 8.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE ND 4,000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE ND 4.000 DC/L VOMSAAX424 DIBROMOMETHANE ND 4.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 DICHLORODIFLO0R0METHANE 10'' 8.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 ETHANOL ND 100.000 OG/L PY VOMSDAX101 ETHYL METHACRYLATE ND 10.000 OC/L PY VOMSDAX101 ETHYLSENZENE ND 4.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 IO00METHANE ND 8.000 COIL VOMSAAX424 METHYLENE CHLORIDE ND 12.000 CG/L VOMSAAX424 STYRENE ND 4.000 DG/L - VOMSAAX424 TETRACHLOROETHENE •5800► 4.000 CC/L VOMSAAX424 TOLOENE ND 4.000 CG/L VOMSAAX424 TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE ND 12.000 CG/L VOMSAAX424 TRANS-I,3-DICHLOROPROPENE ND 4.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 TRICHLOROETHENE 190:- 4.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 TRICHLOROFLCOROMETHANE ND 8.000 CC/L V0MSAAX424 VINYL ACETATE ND 16.000 CC/L VOMSAAX424 VINYL CHLORIDE ND 8.000 CO/L VOMSAAX424 XYLENE(TOTAL) ND 8.000 DC/L VOMSAAX424 NA - Not Analyzed ND - Not Detected TEE - TXip Blank Item Additional Camment Explanations (NO/DL) vOMSAAX424 Dilution factor 4.00 applied. 931061 Site; 488 — Central Weld County Sanitary Landfill Weld County Road 271/2 Miliken CO 80543 NMI ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING LABORATORIES, INC CLIENT REPORT Sample Point: GWMW06 Sample Type: WELL Sample Number: AF2930 Page: 16 ENS: 92-11933 Sampled: 16-JOL--1992 MP: 488921 Received: 17-JOL-1992 REV: 00 Reported: 2-SEP-1992 Analyte Result EMI AL Units Comments Method FIELD DATA: DEPTH TO WATER FROM TOP OF CASING GROUNDWATER ELEV. PH FIELD PH FIELD PH FIELD PH FIELD SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD WATER TEMPERATURE IN DEGREES CELSIUS WELL DEPTH TOTAL CHEMICAL METHODS L ROBOTICS: 6'OO ,. . 4766.90 7.52 7.52 7.50 7.44 4670. 4710. 4690. 4700. 13.6 32.61 I FT FT MSL PH UNITS PH UNITS PH UNITS PH UNITS Ut4HOS/CM UMHOS/CM UMHOS/CM UM80S/CM DEGREES C FT FDWDTWTCO1 FDWCWILWDT FDPHQCADO1 FDPHQUADOI FDPHQOADO1 FDPHQOADOI FDSPCONDO4 FDSPCON004 FDSPCONDO4 FDSPCOND04 FDXTEMPC01 FDWCWELWDT ALKALINITY,BICARBONATE 306 10.000 MG/L CRALKBIC01 ALKALINITY,CARBONATE ND 10.000 MG/L NQ CRALKC0301 CHLORIDE 57.1 0.500 MG/L CRCHLORIOI NITROGEN, AMMONIA ND 0.020 MG/L CRN2NH3X01 NITROGEN, NITRATE 6.06 0.500 MG/L DL CRNO3H%D01 SULFATE 2700 100.000 MG/L DL CRSULFATO1 INORGANICS: ARSENIC -DISSOLVED ND 10.000 OG/L INCFAADIAS BARIUM -DISSOLVED ND 200.000 CC/L INICPDISBA CADMIUM -DISSOLVED ND 5.000 OG/L INICPDISCD CALCIUM -DISSOLVED 481000 5000.000 CC/L INICPOISCA CHROMIUM -DISSOLVED 12.1_" 10.000 CC/L INICPDISCR IRON -DISSOLVED ND 100.000 UC/L INICPDISFE LEAD -DISSOLVED ND 25.000 OG/L DL INCFAADIPB MAGNESIUM -DISSOLVED 435000 7250.000 OG/I DL INICPDI5MG MANGANESE -DISSOLVED ND 15.000 CG/L INICPDISCN MERCURY -DISSOLVED ND 0.200 OC/L INCVAADIHC POTASSIUM -DISSOLVED 5860 5000.000 UG/L INFAADISXK SELENIUM -DISSOLVED ND 50.000 UG/I DL INGFAADISE SILVER -DISSOLVED ND 25.000 UG/L INICPDISCC SODIUM -DISSOLVED 168000 5000.000 UG/L INICPOISNA SUB -CONTRACT DATA: GROSS ALPHA 33.6 0.100 PCI/L +/- SBALPHBETA GROSS BETA 17.2 '0.100 PCI/L +/- SBALPHBETA RADIUM 226 5 0.100 PCI/L +/- SB 58RA226228 RADIUM 226 -STANDARD DEVIATION RADIUM 228 1.2 ND 0.100 PCI/L +1- PCI/L +/- SS SB SBRA226228 58RA226228 RADIUM 228 -STANDARD DEVIATION STANDARD DEVIATION -GROSS ALPHA STANDARD DEVIATION -GROSS BETA 2.5 42.4 40.7 PCl/L +/- PCl/L +/- PCl/L +/- SB SSRA226228 SBALPHBETA SBALPHBETA SEMI -VOLATILE ORGANICS: 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOXYACETIC ACID - ND 1.000 CC/1. 5VCC2HRB01 2-(2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOXY)PROPIONIC ACID ND 1.000 OC/L SVGC2HRB01 ENDRIN ND 0.100 OC/L SVCC10CPOI LINDANE (GAMMA-BHC) ND 0.050 UG/L SVGC10CP01 METHOXYCHLOR ND 0.500 OG/L SVGCIOCP01 TOXAPHENE ND 1.000 OC/L SVGC10CP01 NA - Not Analyzed ND - Not Detected THE - Trip Blank Item Additional Cent Explanations (NO/DI) ALKALINITY, CARBONATE CARBONATE ALKALINITY IS 0 MG/L BECAUSE SAMPLE PH < 8.3. NITROGEN, NITRATE Dilution factor 10 applied. SULFATE Dilution factor 20 applied. . LEAD -DISSOLVED Dilution factor 05 applied. MAGNESIUM -DISSOLVED Dilution factor 5 applied. SELENIUM -DISSOLVED Dilution factor 10 applied. SBRA226228 CORE , 931061 Page: 17 SKI ENVIROMIENTAL MONITORING LABORATORIES, ANC CLIENT REPORT Site: 488 - Central Weld County Sanitary Landfill Weld County Road 271/2 Miliken CO 80543 Sample Point: GWMWO6 Sample Type: WELL Sample Number: AF2930 ENS: 92-11933 Sampled: 16 -JCL -1992 MP: 488921 Received: 17-JUL-1992 REV: 00 Reported: 2-SEP-1992 Analyte Result SNI, AL Units Comments Method VOLATILE ORGANICS: 1.1.1-TRICHLOROETHANE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 1,1.2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ND 2.000 UG/L VOMSAAX424 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 1,1-DICHL0R0ETHANE ND 3.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 1.1-DICHLOROETHENE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 1.2.3-TRICHLOROPROPANE ND 2.000 DG/L V0MSAAX424 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE ND 2.000 DG/L VOMSAAX424 1,4-DICHLORO-2-BOTENE(TOTAL) ND 2.000 OC/L VOMSAAX424 1,4•DIFLOOROBENZENE NA OG/L VOMSAAX424 2-BOTANONE ND 20.000 DG/L V0MSAAX424 2-CHLOROETHYLVINYL ETHER ND 5.000 OG/L ST VOMSAAX424 2-HEXANO.NE ND 4.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 4-BROMOFLUOROBENZENE ND 0.800 UG/L VOMSl.AX424 4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE ND 5.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 ACETONE ND 25.000 DG/L V0MSAAX424 ACROLEIN ND 10,000 can VOMSOAX101 ACRYLONITRILE ND 10.000 DG/L VOMSDAX101 BENZENE ND 1.000 CG/L VOMSAAX424 BROMOCHLOROMETHANE ND 2.000 DG/L V0MSAAX424 BROMODICHLOROMETHANE ND 1.000 DC/L V0MSAAX424 BROMOFORM ND 1.000 DG/L VOMSAAX424 BROMOMETHANE ND 2.000 CC/L VOMSAAX424 CARBON DISULFIDE ND 3.000 UG/L VOMSAAX424 CARBON TETRACHLORIDE ND 1.000 DG/L VOMSAAX424 CHLOROBENZENE ND a 1,000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 CHLOROETRANE ND 3.000 DWI. VOMSAAX424 CHLOROFORM ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 CHLOROMETHANE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPAOPENE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE ND 1.000 OG/L V0MSAAX424 .DIBROMOMETHANE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 DICHLORODIFLOOROMETHANE ND 2.000 00/L V0MSAAX424 ETHANOL ND 100.000 DO/L VOMSDAX101 ETHYL METHACRYLATE ND 10.000 CC/L VOMSDAX101 ETHYLBENZENE ND 1.000 UG/L VOMSAAX424 IODOMETHANE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 METHYLENE CHLORIDE ND 3.000 00/L VOMSAAX424 STYRENE. ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 TETRACHLOROETHENE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 TOLUENE ND 1.000 UG/L VOMSAAX424 TRANS-I,2-DICHLOROETHENE ND 3.000 Uc/L VOMSAAX424 TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE ND 1.000 DG/L VOMSAAX424 TRICHLOROETHENE ND 1.000 UG/L V0MSAAX424 TRICHLOROFLCOROMETHANE ND 2.000 DG/L VOMSAAX424 VINYL ACETATE ND 4.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 VINYL CHLORIDE ND 2.000 CG/I. VOMSAAX424 XYLENE(TOTAL) ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 NA - Not Analyzed ND - Not Detected TER - Trip Blank 931061 Page: 18 NMI ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING LABORATORIES, INC CLIENT EXPORT Site: 488 — Central Weld County Sanitary Landfill weld County Road 271/2 Miliken CO 80543 Sample Point: GWMw07 ENS: 92-11933 Sampled: 20-JUL-1992 Sample Type: WELL HP: 488921 Received: 21-JUL-1992 Sample Number: AF2933 REV: 00 Reported: 2-SEP-1992 Analyte Result ENQ' ILL Units Comments Method CHEMICAL METHODS i ROBOTICS: ALEALINITY,BICAR80NATE 500 10.000 MG/L CRALX8IC01 ALEALINITY, CARBONATE ND 10.000 MG/L NO CRALXC0301 CHLORIDE 17.7 0.500 MG/L CRCHLORI01 NITROGEN, AMMONIA 0.22 0.040 MG/L DL CRN2NH3X01 NITROGEN, NITRATE 0.34 0.050 MG/L CRNO3HYD01 SULFATE 2400 100.000 MG/L DL CRSOLFATO1 INORGANICS: . ARSENIC -DISSOLVED ND 10.000 OG/L :NGFAADIAS BARIUM -DISSOLVED ND 200.000 OG/L INICPOISBA CADMIUM -DISSOLVED ND 5.000 OG/L INICPDISCD CALCIUM -DISSOLVED 439000 5000.000 OG/L INICPDISCA CHROMIUM -DISSOLVED 12.8 10.000 OG/L IN:CPO:SCR IRON^DISSOLVED ND 100.000 0G/L INICPDISFE LEAD -DISSOLVED ND 23.000 OG/L ' DL INGFAADIPB MAGNESIUM -DISSOLVED oc' 7250.000 OG/L DL INICPDISMG MANGANESE -DISSOLVED MERCURY -DISSOLVED — 80.5 ND 15.000 0.200 OGiL OG/L INICPDISM-4 INCVAADIHG POTASSIUM -DISSOLVED 7770 5000.000 OG/L INFAADCSXX SELENIUM -DISSOLVED ND 25.000 OG/L DL INGFAADISE SILVER -DISSOLVED ND 125.000 OG/L DL INICPDISAG SODIUM -DISSOLVED 221000 5000,000 OG/L INICPDISNA SOB -CONTRACT DATA: GROSS ALPHA 144 0,100 PCI/L +/- SBALPHBETA GROSS BETA 73.8 0.100 PCl/L +/- SBALPHSETA RADIUM 226 RADIUM 226 -STANDARD DEVIATION 2.4 .9 0.100 PCI/L +/- PCl/L +/- SB SB SBRA226228 58RA226228 RADIUM 228 RADIUM 228 -STANDARD DEVIATION STANDARD DEVIATION -GROSS ALPHA STANDARD DEVIATION -GROSS BETA SEAR -VOLATILE ORGANICS: ND 1.6 46.6 35 0.100 PCI/L +1- PCI/L +1- PCI/L +/- PCI/L +/- SB SB SBRA226228 SBRA226228 SBALPHBETA SBALPHBETA 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOXYACETIC ACID ND 1.000 OG/L SVCC2HRB01 2-(2.4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOXX)PROPIONIC ACID ND 1.000 UG/L svccznR801 ENDRIN ND 0.100 UG/L MX SVGC1OCP01 LINDANE (GAMMA-BHC) ND 0.050 (2C/L MX SVGCIOCPO1 METHOXYCHLOR ND 0.500 OG/L MX SVGC100P01 TOXAPHENE • VOLATILE ORGANICS: ND 1.000 OG/L MX SVGClOCP01 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE ND 2.000 UC/L VOMSAAX424 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE 1,1-DICHLORO£THANE ND ND 16.- 2.000 1.000 3.000 OG/L OG/L UG/L V0MSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE ND 2.000 00/L VOMSAAX424 1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 1,4-DICHLORO-2-BUTENE(TOTAL) a.16,. ND ND 2,000 2.000 2.000 UG/L OG/L 0C/L VOMI5AAC424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 NA - Not Analyzed ND - Not Detected TBX - Trip Blank Item Additional Comment Explanations O10/DX) ALKALINITY, CARBONATE NITROGEN, AMMONIA CARBONATE ALKALINITY IS 0 MG/L BECAUSE SAMPLE PH < 8.3, Dilution factor 2 applied. SULFATE Dilution factor 20 applied. LEAD -DISSOLVED Dilution factor 05 applied. MAGNESIUM -DISSOLVED Dilution factor 5 applied. SELENIUM -DISSOLVED Dilution factor 05 applied. SILVER -DISSOLVED Dilution factor 5 applied. SBRA226228 CORE SVGC2HRH01 THE LAB CONTROL STANDARD ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SAMPLE FAILED RECOVERY CRITERIA. 4 , AL^ Site: 488 — Central Weld County Sanitary Landfill Weld County Road 271/2 Miliken CO 80543 NMI ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING LABORATOREES, INC CLIENT REPORT Sample Point: GWMW07 Sample Type: WELL Sample Number: AF2933 Page: 19 ENS: 92-11933 Sampled: 20-JOL-1992 MP:- 488921 Received: 21-JUL-1992 REV: 00 Reported: 2-SEP-1992 Analyte Result ESL EL Onita Comments Method 1,4-DIFLCOROBENZENE 2-BUTANONE 2-CHLOROETHYLVINYL ETHER 2-HEXANONE NA ND ND 20.000 5.000 DG/1, OG/L UG/L ST V0MSAAX424 V0MSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 4-BROMOFLUOROBENZENE 4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE ND ND 4.000 0.800 UG/L OWL VOME 424 VOMSAAX424 ACETONE ND 5.000 00/L VOMSAAX424 ACROLEIN ND 25.000 UG/L VOMSAAX424 ACRYLONITRILE ND 10.000 OC/L PY VOMSDAX101 BENZENE ND 10.000 CG/L Py VOMSDAXICI BROMOCHLOROMETHANE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 BROMODICHLOROMETHANE ND 2.000 UG/L V0MSAAX424 BROMOFORM ND 1.000 UC/L VOMSAAX424 BROMOMETHANE CARBON DISULFIDE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE CHLOROBENZENE ND ND ND ND 1.000 2.000 3.000 1.000 UG/L 00/1. DG/L 0G/L VOMSAAX424 V0MSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 CHLOROETHANE ND 1.000 OG/L 4 CHLOROFORM CHLOROMETHAKE CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE ND ND ND 3.000 2.000 2.000 OWLV u0/L OG/L MSAAX424 V VOMSAAX424 MSAAX 24 DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE ND 1.000 CG/L VOMSAAX424 DIBEOMOMETHANE D ICHLORODIFLUOROME ETHANOL ETHYL METHACRYLATE ETHYLHENZENE IODOMET.HANE METHYLENE CHLORIDE'. STYRENE ND ND 18. ND ND ND ND ND 1.000 1.000 2.000 100.000 10.000 1.000 3.000 3.000 OG/L UG/L OG/L /L DC OG/L OG/L OG/L OG/L PY PY VOMSAAX424 424 V0MSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSDAX11 VOMSDAX101 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 TETRACHLOROETHENE TOLUENE TOLUENE ND L38t 1.000 1.000 OG/L OG/L V0MSAAX424 TRANS-1,2-DICHLORCETHENEVOMSAAX424 ND - 1.000 OG/L TRANS-I,3-DICHLOROPAOPENE 09 3.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 TRICHLOROETRENE TRICHLOROFLOOROMETHANE VINYL ACETATE VINYL CHLORIDE XYLENE(TOTAL) ND O2 ND 2.' ND 1.000 1.000 2.000 4.000 2.000 2.000 UG/L OG/L OG/L UG/L OWL OG/L V0MSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 voMSAAX424 Not Detected TDX - Trip Blank 931061 Page: 20 ac ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING LABORATORIES, INC CLIENT REPORT Site: 488 — Central Weld County Sanitary Landfill Weld County Road 271/2 Miliken CO 80543 Sample Point: GWMW07 Sample Type: WELL Sample Number: AF2933 ENS: 92-11933 Sampled: 20-JUL-1992 MP: 488921 Received: 27-JUL-1992 RSV: 00 Reported: 2-SEP-1992 Analyte Result EML EL Units Comments Method - FIELD DATA: - DEPTH TO WATER FROM TOP OF CASING 6.4 FT FDWDTWTC01 GROUNDWATER ELEV. 4 67 FT MSL FDWGWELWDT PH FIELD 7.29 PH UNITS FDPHQUAD01 PH FIELD 7.28 PH UNITS FDPHQUAO01 PR FIELD 7.27 PH UNITS FDPHQUAD01 PH FIELD 7.26 PH UNITS FDPHQUAD01 SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD 4520. OVOIDS/CM FDSPCOND04 SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD 4500. UMNOS/CM FDSPCOND04 SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD 4530. UMHOS/CM FDSPCOND04 SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD 4520. UWOS/CM FDSPCOND04 WATER TEMPERATURE IN DEGREES CELSIUS 14.6 DEGREES C FDXTEMPC01 WELL DEPTH TOTAL 25.85 FT FDWGWELWDT NA - Not Analyzed ND - Not Detected TBE - Trip Blank 931061 Site: 488 — Central Weld County Sanitary Landfill Weld County Road 271/2 Miliken CO 80543 NMI ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING LABORATORIES, INC CLIENT REPORT Sample Point: GWMW08 Sample Type: WELL Sample Number: AF2927 Page: 21 ENS: 92-11933 Sampled: 16-JUL-1992 MP: 488921 Received: 17-JUL-1992 REV: 00 Reported: 2-SEP-1992 Analyte Result ENL RL Units Comments Method FIELD DATA: DEPTH TO WATER FROM TOP OF CASING 43.60 FT FDWDTWTC01 GROUNDWATER ELEV. 4790.38 FT MSL FDWGWELWDT PH FIELD 7.31 PH UNITS FDPHQUADO1 PH FIELD 7.28 PH UNITS FDPHQOADO1 PH FIELD 7.27 PH UNITS FDPHQUADO1 PH FIELD 7.28 PM UNITS FDPHOUADO1 SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD 5680. U)O OS/CM FDSPCONDO4 SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD 5670. UMMOS/CM FDSPCONDO4 SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD 5690, UMHOS/CM FDSPCONDO4 SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD 5680. UMMOS/CM FDSPCONDO4 WATER TEMPERATURE IN DEGREES CELSIUS 13.3 DEGREES C FDXTEMPC01 WELL DEPTH TOTAL 82.24 FT FDWCWELWOT CHEMICAL METHODS i ROBOTICS: ALICALINITY,BICA iBONATE 329 10.000 MG/L CRALEBIC01 ALKALINITY,CARBONATE ND 10.000 MG/L NO CRALRC0301 CHLORIDE 39.8 0.500 MC/L CRCHLORIO1 NITROGEN, AMMONIA ND 0.020 MG/L CRN2NH3X01 NITROGEN, NITRATE 7.17 0.500 MG/L DL CRNO3HYD01 SULFATE 3310 250.000 MC/L DL CRSULFATO1 INORGANICS: ARSENIC -DISSOLVED ND 10.000 UG/L INOFAADIAS BARIUM -DISSOLVED ND 200.000 UG/L INICPDISBA CADMIUM -DISSOLVED ND 5.000 OG/L INICPDISCD CALCIUM -DISSOLVED 419000 5000.000 UG/L INICPDISCA CHROMIUM -DISSOLVED 11.1_- 10.000 UG/L INICPDISCR IRON -DISSOLVED ND 100.000 OG/L INICPDISFE LEAD -DISSOLVED MAGNESIUM -DISSOLVED ND w6.6T000i 25.000 7250.000 OG/L UG/L DL DL INCFAADXPS INICPDISMC MANGANESE -DISSOLVED 'X•640" 15.000 UG/L INICPDISCN MERCURY -DISSOLVED ND 0,200 UG/L INCVAADIMG POTASSIUM -DISSOLVED 9120 5000.000 UG/L INFAADISXX SELENIUM -DISSOLVED ND 25.000 OG/L DL INGFAADISE SILVER -DISSOLVED ND 25.000 UG/L INICPDISCG SODIUM -DISSOLVED 232000 5000.000 UG/L INICPDI5NA SOH -CONTRACT DATA: GROSS ALPHA 53.9 0.100 PCI/L +/- SHALPHBETA GROSS BETA 4.7 0.100 PCI/L +/- SBALPHBETA RADIUM 226 - 1.5 0.100 PCI/L +/- SD SBRA226228 RADIUM 226 -STANDARD DEVIATION .8 PCI/L +/- S8 SBRA226228 RADIUM 228 ND 0.100 PCl/L +/- SB SBRA226228 RADIUM 228 -STANDARD DEVIATION 2.3 PCX/L +/- SB SBRA226228 STANDARD DEVIATION -CROSS ALPHA 45.1 PCl/L +/- SBALPHBETA STANDARD DEVIATION -GROSS BETA 46.1 PCI/L +/- SHALPHBETA SEMI -VOLATILE ORGANICS: 2.4-DICHLOROPMENOXYACETIC ACID - ND 1.000 UG/L SVGC2MR801 2-(2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOXY)PROPIONIC ACID ND 1.000 UG/L SVGC2MRB01 ENDRIN ND 0.100 UG/L SVGC10CP01 LINDANE (GAN_YA-BHCI ND 0.050 OG/L SvcC10CP01 METHOXYCHLOR ND 0.500 00/L SVGC1oCPo1 TOXAPHENE ND 1.000 DC/L SVCC10CP01 NA - Not Analyzed ND - Not Detected TBK - Trip Blank Item Additional Comment Explanations (NQ/DL) ALKALINITY,CARBONATE CARBONATE ALKALINITY IS 0 MG/L BECAUSE SAMPLE PH < 8.3. NITROGEN, NITRATE Dilution factor 10 applied, SULFATE Dilution factor 50 applied. LEAD -DISSOLVED Dilution factor 05 applied. MAGNESIUM -DISSOLVED Dilution factor 5 applied. SELENIUM -DISSOLVED Dilution factor 05 applied. SBRA226228 CORE • NMI ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING LABORATORIES, INC CLIENT REPORT site: 488 - Central Weld County Sanitary Landfill Weld County Road 271/2 Miliken C0 80543 Sample Point: GWMW08 Sample Type: WELL Sample Number: AF2927 ENS: 92-11933 Sampled: 16-JUL-1992 NP: 488921 Received: 17-JUL-1992 REV: 00 Reported: 2-SEP-1992 Analyte Result EML RL Units Comments Method VOLATILE ORGANICS: 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 1,1.2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE 1.1-DICHLOROETHANE 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE 1,2,3= RICHLOROPROPANE 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 1,4-DICHLORO-2-BOTENE(TOTAL) 1,4-DIFLOOROBENZENE 2-BCTANONE NO ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NA ND 2.000 1.000 3.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 • 20.000 OC/L OG/L OG/L OG/L OG/L OG/L OG/L OG/L DG/L OG/L VOMSAAX424 V0MSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VONSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOM5AAX424 2-CHLOROETHYLVINYL ETHER 2-HEXANONE 4-BROMOFLOOROBENZENE ND ND ND 5.000 4.000 0.800 OG/L OG/L OC/L ST VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE ACETONE ND ND 5.000 25.000 OG/L OG/L VOMSAAX424 V0MSAAX424 ACROLEIN ND 10.000 OG/L VOMSDAX101 ACRYLONITRILE ND 10.000 OC/L VOMSDA4101 BENZENE - BR0M0CHLOROMETHANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE ND ND ND 1.000 2.000 1.000 OG/L DG/L OG/L VOMSAAX424 V0MSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 8ROMOFOR.M BROMOM.ETHANE ND ND 1.000 2.000 DG/L OG/L VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 CARBON DISULFIDE ND 3.000 DC/L VOMSAAX424 CARBON TETRACHLORIDE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 CHLOROBENZENE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 CHLOROETHANE ND 3.000 DG/L VOMSAAX424 CHLOROFORM CHLOROMETHANE ND ND 2.000 2.000 OG/L OG/L VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE ND ND 1.000 1.000 DG/L DG/L VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 DISROMOMETHANE DICHLORODIFLDOROMETHANE ND ND 1.000 2.000 0G/L OG/L VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 ETHANOL ND 100.000 CG/L VOMSDAX101 ETHYL METHACRYLATE ND 10.000 OG/L VOMSDAX101 ETHYLBENZENE IODOMETHANE ND ND 1.000 2.000 OG/L DG/L VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 METHYLENE CHLORIDE ND 3.000 OWL VOMSAAX424 STYRENE ND 1.000 OC/L VOMSAAX424 TETRACHLOROETHENE ND 1.000 OC/L - VOMSAAX424 TOLOENE ND 1.000 C'G/L V0MSAAX424 TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE ND 3,000 OG/L V0MSAAX424 TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE TRICHLOROETHENE TRICHLOROFLCOROMETHANE ND ND ND 1.000 1,000 2.000 UG/L OG/L OG/L VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VINYL ACETATE VINYL CHLORIDE XYLENE(TOTAL) ND ND ND 4.000 2,000 2.000 OWL aG/L OG/L VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 NA a Not Analyzed ND - Not Detected TBE a Trip Blank 931061 Site: 488 — Central Weld County Sanitary Landfill Weld County Road 271/2 Miliken CC 80543 NMI ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING LABORATORIES, INC CLIENT REPORT Sample Point: GWMB'09 Sample Type: WELL Sample Number: AF2925 Page: 23 ENS: 92-11933 Sampled: 15-JUL-1992 MP: 488921 Received: 16-JUL-1992 REV: 00 Reported: 2-SEP-1992 Analyte Result Bl0. RI. finite comments 'Method FIELD DATA: DEPTH TO WATER FROM TOP OF CASING GROUNDWATER ELEV. 477e,52 t"12;-59'8;FT FT MSL BDNDTWTC01 FDWGWELWDT PH FIELD 7.06 PH UNITS FDPHOCADOI PH FIELD 7.03 PH UNITS FDPHQCADO1 PH FIELD 7.01 PH UNITS FDPHQOADOI PH FIELD 6.93 PH UNITS FDPHQOADO1 SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD 3390. 0MH05/Cl FOSPCOND04 SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD 3580. UMHOS/CM FDSPCONDC4 SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD 3400. 019105/CM FDSPCOND04 SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD 3420, UMHOS/CM FDSPCONDD4 WATER TEMFERATORE IN DEGREES CELSIUS 14.6 DEGREES C FDXTEMPC01 WELL DEPTH TOTAL 77.15 VT FDWGWELWDT CIUJCCAL M03THODS L ROBOTICS: ALKALINITY,BICAREONATE 366 10.000 MG/L CRALKBIC0/ ALXALINITY,CARBONATE ND 10.000 MG/L NQ CRALKC0301 CHLORIDE 18.7 0.500 MG/L CRCHLORIOI NITROGEN, AMMONIA 0,23 0,020 MG/L CRN2NHCX01 NITROGEN, NITRATE ND 0.050 MG/L CRN03MX001 SULFATE 1870 100.000 MG/L DL CRSULFATO1 INORGANICS: ARSENIC -DISSOLVED ND 10.000 00/L INGFAADIAS BARIUM -DISSOLVED ND 200.000 OG/I. INXCPDISBA CADMIUM -DISSOLVED ND 5.000 UG/L INICPDISCD CALCIUM -DISSOLVED 412000 5000.000 OG/L INICPDISCA CHROMIUM -DISSOLVED ND 10.000 OG/L INICPDISCR IRON -DISSOLVED 547 100.000 OC/L INICPDISFE LEAD -DISSOLVED ND 25.000 UG/L DL INGFAADIPB MAGNESIUM -DISSOLVED 309000 7250.000 UC/L DL INICPDISMG MANGANESE -DISSOLVED 463 15.000 DC/L INICPDISCN MERCURY -DISSOLVED ND 0.200 UG/L INCVAADIHG POTASSIUM -DISSOLVED 8780 5000.000 UG/L INFAADISXK SELENIUM -DISSOLVED ND 25.000 OG/L DL INGFAADISE SILVER -DISSOLVED ND 25.000 OC/L INICPDISAG SODIUM -DISSOLVED 164000 5000.000 0G/L INICPDISNA SUB -CONTRACT DATA: GROSS ALPHA 24.8 0.100 PCl/L +/- SBALPHBETA GROSS BETA 52.4 0.100 PCl/L */- SBALPHBETA RADIUM 226 4 0.100 PCl/L +1- SE SBRA226228 RADIUM 226 -STANDARD DEVIATION ' 1.1 PCI/L +/- SB SBRA226228 RADIUM 228 ND 0.100 PCl/L +1- SB SBRA226228 RADIUM 228 -STANDARD DEVIATION 1.6 PCl/L.+/- $B SBRA226228 STANDARD DEVIATION -GROSS ALPHA 29.2 PCI/L +/- SBALPHBETA STANDARD DEVIATION -GROSS BETA 26.7 PCI/L +1- SBALPHBETA SEMI -VOLATILE ORGANICS: 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOXYACETIC ACID NO 1.000 aG/L SVGC2BRSOI 2-(2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOXY)PROPIONIC ACID ND 1.000 OG/L SVGC2NRB0I ENDRIN ND 0.100 'GIL SVGC10CP01 LINDANE (GAMMA -BBC) ND 0.050 QG/L SVGCIOCP01 METHOXYCHLOR ND 0.500 CG/L SVGC10CPOI TOXAPHENE i ND 1.000 OG/L SVGCIOCP01 NA - Not Analyzed ND - Not Detected TBR - ?tip Blank Item Additional Consent Explanations (NQ/DL) ALEALINITY,CARBONATE SULFATE LEAD -DISSOLVED MAGNESIUM -DISSOLVED SELENIUM -DISSOLVED SBRA226228 CARBONATE ALKALINITY IS 0 MG/L BECAUSE SAMPLE PH < 8.3. Dilution factor 20 applied. Dilution factor 5 applied. Dilution factor 5 applied. Dilution factor 05 applied. CORE /C1 Site: 488 - Central Weld County Sanitary Landfill Weld County Road 271/2 Miliken CO 80543 imC ENVTRO}IDNTa MONITORING LABORATORIES, INC CLIENT REPORT Sample Point: GWMW09 Sample Type: WELL Sample Number: AF2925 Page: 24 ENS: 92-11933 Sampled: 15 -JCL -1992 MP: 488921 Received: 16 -JCL -1992 REV: 00 Reported: 2-SEP-1992 Analyte Result mlu, RL Unita Comments Method VOLATILE ORGANICS: 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE ND 2.000 OC/L VOMSAAX424 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ND 2.000 UG/L VOMSAAX424 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE ND 1.000 UG/L VOMSAAX424 1.1-DICHLOROETHANE ND 3.000 OC/L VOMSAAX424 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE ND 2.000 OC/L VOMSAAX424 1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE ND 2.000 OC/L VOMSAAX424 1.2-DICHLOROETHANE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE ND 2.000 OC/L VOMSAAX424 1.4-DICHLOR0-2-80TENE(TOTAL) ND 2.000 OC/L VOMSAAX424 1,4-DIFLUOROBENZENE NA 0G/L VOMSAAX424 2-BOTANONE ND 20.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 2-CHLOROETHYLVINYL ETHER ND 5.000 'MIL ST VOMSAAX424 2-HEXAN0N£ ND 4.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 4-BROMOFLOOROBENZENE ND 0.800 DG/1. VOMSAAX424 4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE ND 5.000 00/1 V0MSAAX424 ACETONE ND 25.000 0G/1 VOMSAAX424 ACROLEIN ND 10.000 OG/L VOMSDAX101 ACRYLONITRILE ND 10.000 00/1 VOMSDAX101 BENZENE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 BROMOCHLOROMETHANE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 BROMODICHLOROMETHANE ND 1.000 DC/1. VOMSAAX424 BROMOFORM ND 1.000 0G/L VOMSAAX424 BROMOMETHANS ND 2.000 CG/L VOMSAAX424 CARBON DISULFIDE ND 3.000 OC/L VOMSAAX424 CARBON TETRACHLORIDE ND 1.000 OWL VOMSAAX424 CHLOROBENZENE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 CHLOROETHANE ND 3.000 00/L V0MSAAX424 CHLOROFORM ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 CRLOROMETHANE ND 2.000 UG/L VOMSAAX424 CIS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 OIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE ND 1.000 OC/L VOMSAAX424 DISROMOMETHANE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE ND 2.000 UG/L V0MSAAX424 ETHANOL ND 100.000 OC/L VOMSDAX101 ETHYL METHACRYLATE ND 10.000 0G/L VOMSDAX101 ETHYLBENZENE ND 1.000 OG/L V0MSAAX424 IODOMETHANE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 METHYLENE CHLORIDE ND 3.000 00/L VOMSAAX424 STYRENE • ND 1.000 00/1 VOMSAAX424 TETRACHLOROETHENE ND 1.000 0G/L VOMSAAX424 TOLUENE ND 1.000 00/L V0MSAAX424 TRANS-I,2-DICHLOROETHENE ND 3.000 OC/L VOMSAAX424 TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE ND 1.000 00/L VOMSAAX424 TRICHLOROETHENE ND 1.000 0G/L VOMSAAX424 TRICHLOROFLOOROMETHANE ND 2.000 OGIL VOMSAAX424 VINYL ACETATE VINYL CHLORIDE ND ND 4.000 2.000 OG/L OG/L VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 XYLENE(TOTAL) ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 NA - Not Analyzed ND - Not Detected TEN a Trip Blank 931061 iv1 ‘leglif Siteentral Weld County sanitary Landfill Weld County Road 271/2 Miliken CO 80543 uml ENVIRONMENTA7. MONITORING LABORATORIES, INC CLIENT REPORT Sample Point: GWMW10 Sample Type: WELL Sample Number: AF2923 Page: 25 ENS: 92-11933 Sampled: 15-JUL-1992 It: 488921 Received: 16-JUL-1392 REV: 00 Reported: 2-SEP-1992 Analyte Result PC. RL Units Cents Method FIELD DATA: DEPTH TO WATER FROM TOP OF CASING - , .,.48. FT FOWD;WTCOl GROUNDWATER ELEV. 74.1787.24 FT MSL FDWGWELWOT PH FIELD 6.88 PH UNITS FDPHQUADOI PH FIELD 6.88 PH UNITS FDPHQUADCI PH FIELD 6.87 PH UNITS FDPHQUA001 PH FIELD 6.85 PH UNITS FDPHQUA001 SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD 4300, 0MfOS/CM FDSPCONDO4 SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD 4300. UMNOS/CM - FDSPCONDO4 SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD 4300. 4300. U)Ot0S/CM O!O(OS/CM FDSPCONDO4 FDSPCONDO4 WATER TEMPERATURE IN DEGREES CELSIUS 15.8 DEGREES C FDXTEMPC01 WELL DEPTH TOTAL 62.39 FT FDWCWELWDT CHEMICAL METHODS i ROBOTICS: ALKALINITY,BICARBONATE 802 10.000 MG/L CRALXBIC01 ALKALINITY,CARBONATE ND 10.000 MG/L NO CRALXC0301 CHLORIDE 27.2 0.500 MG/L CRCHLOnI01 NITROGEN, AMMONIA 0.52 0.020 MC/I, CRN2NH3X01 NITROGEN, NITRATE ND 0.050 MG/L CRNO3HYD01 SULFATE 2590 100.000 MG/L DL CRSULFAf01 INORGANICS: ARSENIC -DISSOLVED ND 10.000 OWL INGFAADIS5 BARIUM -DISSOLVED ND 200.000 van. INICPDISBA CADMIUM -DISSOLVED ND 5.000 OG/L INICPDISCD CALCIUM -DISSOLVED 512000 7650.000 UG/L DL INICPDISCA CHROMIUM -DISSOLVED ND 10.000 OG/L INICPDI5CR IRON -DISSOLVED 2620 100.000 UG/L INICPDISFE LEAD -DISSOLVED ND 25.000 UC/L DL INGFAADIPB MAGNESIUM -DISSOLVED 528000 7250.000 UG/L DL INICPDI5MG MANGANESE -DISSOLVED 834 15.000 UC/L INICPDISMN MERCURY -DISSOLVED ND 0.200 OG/L INCVAADIHG POTASSIUM -DISSOLVED 11800 5000.000 DG/L INFAADISXE SELENIUM -DISSOLVED ND 50.000 OG/L DL INGFAADISE SILVER -DISSOLVED Nt 25.000 CG/L INICPDISAG SODIUM -DISSOLVED 221000 5000.000 UG/L INICPDISNA SUB -CONTRACT DATA: GROSS ALPHA 37.5 0.100 PCl/L +/- SBALPHBETA GROSS BETA 25.6 0.100 PCl/L +1- SBALPfGETA RADIUM 226 4.3 .0.100 PCI/L +/- SB SSRA226228 RADIUM 226 -STANDARD DEVIATION 1.2 PCl/L +/- SS SBRA226228 RADIUM 228 2.2 0.100 PCl/L +/- SB 58RA226228 RADIUM 228 -STANDARD DEVIATION 1.8 PCI/L +/- $B S8RA226228 STANDARD DEVIATION -GROSS ALPHA 40.6 PCl/L +/- SBALPHBETA STANDARD DEVIATION -GROSS BETA 45.2 PCI/L +1- SBALPHBETA SOC-VOLATILE ORGANICS: 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOXYACETIC ACID ND 1.000 UG/L SVCC2HRB01 2-(2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOXY) PROPIONIC ACID ND 1.000 OG/L SVGC2HRB0I ENDRIN ND 0.100 OG/L MX SVGCLOCPOI LINDANE (GAMMA-BHC) ND 0.050 00/1. DDC SVGC10CP01 METHOXYCHLOR ND 0.500 UG/L MX SVCCIOCP01 TOXAPHENE ND 1.000 UG/L MX SVCC1OCP01 NA - Not Analyzed. ND - Not Detected TBE - Trip Blank Item Additional Comment Explanations (NQ/DL) ALKALINITY, CARBONATE SULFATE CALCIUM -DISSOLVED LEAD -DISSOLVED MAGNESIUM -DISSOLVED SELENIUM -DISSOLVED 5BRA226228 CARBONATE ALXALINITY 15 0 MG/L BECAUSE SAMPLE PH < Dilution factor 20 applied. Dilution factor 5 applied. Dilution factor 5 applied. Dilution factor 5 applied. Dilution factor 10 applied. CORE 8.3. vo a site: 488 — Central weld County Sanitary Landfill Wield County Road 271/2 M1liken CO 80543 NMI ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING LABORATORIES, INC CLIENT REPORT Sample Point: GNMN10 Sample Type: NELL Sample Number: AF2923 Page: 26 ENS: 92-11933 Sampled: 15-JOL-1992 MP: 488921 Received: 16-JOL-1992 REV: 00 Reported: 2-SEP-1992 Analyte Result EML RL Unite Casemate Method VOLATILE ORGANICS: 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 1,1.2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ND 2-.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 1,1,2-TRICHL0R0ETHANE ND 1.000 OWL VOMSAAX424 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE ND 3.000 UG/L VOMSAAX424 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE ND 2.000 OG/L V0MSAAX424 1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 1,4-DICHLORO-2-BOTENE(TOTAL) ND 2,000 OG/L V0MSAAX424 -1,4-DIFLOOROBENZENE 2-B0TANONE NA ND 20.000 OG/L OG/L VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 2-CHLOROETHYLVINYL ETHER ND 5.000 OG/L ST VOMSAAX424 2-HEXANONE ND 4.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 4-BROMOFLOOROBENZENE ND 0.800 OG/L VOMSAAX424 4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE ND 5.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 ACETONE ND 25.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 ACROLEIN ND 10.000 OG/L PY VOMSDAX101 ACRYLONITRILE ND 10.000 OG/L PY VOMSDAX101 BENZENE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE ND ND 1.000 2.000 OG/L - OG/L VOMSAA.t424 VOMSAAX424 BROMODICHLOROMETHANE ND 1.000 OGIL VOMSAAX424 BROMOFORM ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 BROMOMETHANE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 CARBON DISULFIDE 3. = 3.000 00/1 V0MSAAX424 CARBON TETRACHLORIDE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 CHLOROBENZENE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 CHLOROETHANE ND 3.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 CHLOROFORM ND 2.000 OG/L V0MSAAX424 CHLOROMETHANE ND 2.000 DG/L V0MSAAX424 CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE ND 1.000 OWL V0MSAAX424 DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 DIBROMOMETHANE • ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE ND 2.000 00/L VOMSAAX424 ETHANOL ND 100.000 OG/L PY VOMSDAX101 ETHYL METHACRYLATE ND 10.000 OG/L PY VOMSDAX101 ETHYLBENZENE ND 1.000 UG/L V0MSAAX424 IODOMETHANE ND 2.000 UG/L VOMSAAX424 METHYLENE CHLORIDE ND 3.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 STYRENE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 TETRACHLOROETHENE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 TOLUENE ND 1.000 00/L VOMSAAX424 TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHANE ND 3.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 TRICHLOROETHENE - ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 TRICHLOROFLOOROMETHANE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 VINYL ACETATE ND 4.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 VINYL CHLORIDE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 XYLENECTOTAL) ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 NA - Not Analyzed ND - Not Detected THE - Trip Blank 931061 Site: 488 - Central Weld County Sanitary Landfill Weld County Road 271/2 Mili.ken CO 80543 1141 EN(VIRONMIENr'AL MONITORING LARORATORIES, INC CLIENT REPORT Sample Point: GWMW11 Sample Type: WELL Sample Ntmbar: AF2932 Page: 27 ENS: 92-11933 Sampled: 17-JUL-1992 MP: 488921 Received: 18-JUL-1992 REV: 00 Reported: 2-SEP-1992 Analyte Result EML RL Units Counts Method FIELD DATA: DEPTH TO WATER FROM TOP OF CASING ;r2Q F7 FONDTWTCO1 GROUNDWATER ELEV. 4741.62 FT MSL FDNGWELWDT Pa FIELD 7.36 PH UNITS TDPHQDADO/ PH FIELD 7,36 PR UNITS FOPHQUADO1 PH FIELD 7.35 PH UNITS FDPHQOADO1 PH FIELD 7.33 PH UNITS FDPHQUADO1 SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD 4920. OM(O3/Q( FDSPCONDO4 SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD 4930. OMIOS/Q4 FDSPCONDO4 SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD 4930. UM(OS/CM FDSPCONDO4 SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD 4950. UMHOS/CM FDSPCONDO4 WATER TEMPERATURE IN DEGREES CELSIUS 21.4 DEGREES C FDXTEMPC01 WELL DEPTH TOTAL 62.51 FT FDWCWELWDT CHEMICAL METHODS L ROBOTICS: ALKALINITY, BICARBONATE 312 10.000 MC/L CRAL BIC01 ALKALINITY, CARBONATE ND 10.000 MG/L NO CRALAC0301 CHLORIDE ' 28.1 0.500 M.C/L CRCHLORI01 NITROGEN, AMMONIA 0.40 0.020 MG/L CRN2NR3X01 NITROGEN, NITRATE NO 0.050 MG/L - CRNO3HYD01 SULFATE 3090 250.000 MG/L DL CRSOIYAT01 INORGANICS: ARSENIC -DISSOLVED ND 10.000 DC/I, INGFAADIAS BARIUM -DISSOLVED ND 200.000 OG/L INICPDISBA CADMIUM -DISSOLVED ND 25.000 OG/L DL INICPDISCD CALCIUM -DISSOLVED 471000 5000.000 UG/L INICPDISCA CHROMIUM -DISSOLVED ND 10.000 OG/L INICPDISCR IRON -DISSOLVED ND 100.000 OG/L INICPDISFE LEAD -DISSOLVED ND 25.000 OG/L DL INGFAADIPB MAGNESIUMDISSOLVED 469000 7250.000 OG/L DL INICPDISCG MANGANESE -DISSOLVED 960 15.000 UG/L INICPDISCN MERCURY -DISSOLVED ND 0.200 OG/L INCVAADING POTASSIUM -DISSOLVED - 8770 5000.000 UG/L INTAADISX( SELENIUM -DISSOLVED - ND 25.000 UG/L DL INGFAADISE SILVER -DISSOLVED ND 25.000 UG/L INICPDISAG SODIUM -DISSOLVED 275000 5000.000 UG/L INICPDISCA SUS -CONTRACT DATA: GROSS ALPHA 10.2 0.100 PCl/I, */- SBALPHBETA GROSS BETA 33.9 0.100 PCI/L */- SBALPHBETA RADIUM 226 11.4 0.100 PCl/L +/- SB SBRA226228 RADIUM 226 -STANDARD DEVIATION 1.7 PCI/L +/- SB SBRA226228 RADIUM 228 3 0.100 PCI/L +/- 58 SBRA226228 RADIUM 228 -STANDARD DEVIATION 3 PCl/L +/- SB SBRA226228 STANDARD DEVIATION -GROSS ALPHA 52.8 PCI/L +/- SBALPHBETA STANDARD DEVIATION -GROSS BETA 65.2 PCI/L +/- SBALPHBETA SEMI -VOLATILE ORGANICS: 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOXYACETIC ACID ND 1.000 UG/L SVGC2HRB01 2-(2,4,5-TRICHLOROPINOXY)PROPIONIC ACID ND 1.000 UG/L - SVGC2HRB01 ENDRIN ND 0.100 UG/L SVGC10CP01 LINDANE (GAMMA-BHC) ND 0.050 CO/L SVCC10CP01 METHOXYCHLOR ND 0.500 OG/L SVGCIOCP01 TOXAPHENE ND 1.000 OG/L SVGC10CP01 NA - Not Analyzed ND - Not Detected THE - Trip Blank Item Additional Comment Explanations (NO/DL) ALKALINITY, CARBONATE CARBONATE ALKALINITY IS 0 MG/L BECAUSE SAMPLE PH < 8.3. SULFATE Dilution factor 50 applied. CADMIUM -DISSOLVED Dilution factor 5 applied. LEAD -DISSOLVED Dilution factor 05 applied. MAGNESIUM -DISSOLVED Dilution factor 5 applied. OS SELENIUM -DISSOLVED SBRA226228 Dilution factor applied. CORE 9-1O K1 SldF Site: 4ntral Weld County Sanitary Landfill Weld County Road 271/2 Miliken CO 80543 n4I ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING LABORATORIES, INC CLIENT REPORT Sample Point: GWMW11 Sample Type: WELL Sample Number: AF2932 Page: 28 ENS: 92-11933 Sampled: 17-JUL-1992 NP: 488921 Received: 18-JUL-1992 REV: 00 Reported: 2-SEP-1992 Analyte Result EIQ. RL Omits Comments Method VOLATILE ORGANICS: 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE - ND 2.000 acne' VOMSAAX424 1,1.2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ND 2.000 OC/L VOMSAAX424 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHENE 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE • ND ND 1.000 3.000 00/1. OC/L VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE ND 2.000 OC/L VOMSAAX424 1,2-DICHL0R0ETHANE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE- ND 2.000 OG/L V0MSAAX424 1,4-DICHLORO-2-BUTENE(TOTAL) ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 1,4-DIFLOOROBENZENE NA OG/L V0MSAAX424 2-BOTANONE ND 20.000 DG/L V0MSAAX424 2-CHLOROETHYLVINYL ETHER ND 5.000 00/1. ST VOMSAAX424 2-HEXANONt ND 4.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 4-BROMOFLOOROBENZENE ND 0.800 OG/L VOMSAAX424 4 -METHYL -2 -PENTANONE ND 5.000 UG/L VOMSAAX424 ACETONE ND 25.000 DG/L VOMSAAX424 ACROLEIN ND 10.000 OG/L PY VOMSDAX101 ACRYLONITRILE ND 10.000 DG/L PY VOMSDAX101 BENZENE ND 1.000 DG/L VOMSAAX424 BROMOCHLOROMETHANE ND 2.000 CG/L VOMSAAX424 BROMODICHLOROMETHANE ND 1.000 OC/L VOMSAAX424 BROMOFORM ND 1.000 OC/L VOMSAAX424 BROMOMETHANE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 CARBON DISULFIDE ND 3.000 00/L VOMSAAX424 CARBON TETRACHLORIDE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 CHLOROBENZENE ND 1,000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 CHLOROETHANE ND 3.000 OC/L VOMSAAX424 CHLOROFORM ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 CHLOROMETHANE ND 2.000 OG/L V0MSAAX424 CIS -1,3-DICRLOROPROPENE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 DIBROMOCHLOR012THANE ND 1.000 UG/I. VOMSAAX424 DIBROMOMETHANE ND 1.000 OC/L V0MSAAX424 DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE ND 2.000 CC/L VOMSAAX424 ETHANOL ND 100.000 OG/L PY VOMSDAX101 ETHYL METHACRYLATE ND 10.000 OC/L PY VOMSDAX101 ETHYLBENZENE ND 1.000 00/L VOMSAAX424 IODOMETHANE ND 2.000 DC/L VOMSAAX424 METHYLENE CHLORIDE ND 3.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 STYRENE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 TETRACHLOROETHENE ND 1.000 OC/L VOMSAAX424 TOLUENE ND 1.000 OG/L VOmsAAX424 TRANS -1,2 -DICHLOROETHENE ND 3.000 CC/L VOMSAAX424 TRANS -1,3 -DICHLOROPROPENE ND 1.000 OC/L - VOMSAAX424 TRICHLOROETHENE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 TRICHLOROFLDOROMETHANE ND 2.000 0G/L VOMSAAX424 VINYL ACETATE ND 4.000 OC/L VOMSAAX424 VINYL CHLORIDE ND 2.000 DG/L VOMSAAX424 XYLENE(TOTAL) ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 Not Analyz ND - Not Detected TSE - Trip flank 931061 Site: 488 — Central Weld County Sanitary Landfill Weld County Road 271/2 Mhliken Co 80543 qQ ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING LABORATORIES, ric CLIENT REPORT Sample Point: GWMW12 Sample Type: WELL Sample :Reber: AF2931 Page: 29 ENS: 92-11933 Sampled: 17-JUL-1992 MP:. 488921 Received: 18-JUL-1992 REV: 00 Reported: 2-SEP-1992 Analyte Result EM, RL Units Comments Netbod FIELD DATA: DEPTH TO WATER FROM TOP OF CASING "3t.3 FT FDWDTWTC01 GROUNDWATER ELEV. 4731.63 FT NSL FDWGWELWDT PH FIELD 6,85 PR UNITS FDPHOOADO1 PH FIELD 6.85 PH UNITS FDPHOOADO1 PM FIELD 6.84 PH OBITS FDPHQUADO1 PH FIELD 6.83 PH UNITS FDPHQUADO1 SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD 6470. UMHOS/CM FDSPCONDO4 SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD 6480. UMIOS/CM FDSPCONDO4 SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD 6500. UMIOS/CM FDSPCONDO4 SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD 6480. UMlOS/CM FDSPCONDO4 WATER TEMPERATURE IN DEGREES CELSIUS 18.5 DEGREES C FDXTEMPC01 WELL DEPTH TOTAL 70.53 FT FDWGWELWDT c1)P2QCAL METHODS c ROBOTICS: ALXALINITY, BICARBONATE 531 10.000 MG/L CRALEBIC01 ALKALINITY,CARBONATE ND 10.000 MG/L NO CRALKC0301 CHLORIDE 36.9 0.500 MG/L CRCHLORIO1 NITROGEN, AMMONIA 1.38 - 0.020 MO/L CRN2NH3X01 NITROGEN, NITRATE ND 0.050 MC/L CRNO3HYD01 SOLFATE 4740 250.000 MG/L DL CRSULFATO1 XNORGANICS: ARSENIC -DISSOLVED ND 10.000 UO/L INGFAADIP5 BARIUM -DISSOLVED ND 200.000 UG/L INICPDISBA CADMIUM -DISSOLVED ND 5.000 OG/L INICPDISCD CALCIUM -DISSOLVED 535000 7650.000 OG/L DL INICPDISCA CHROMIUM -DISSOLVED 11.5 10.000 OG/L INICPDISCR IRON -DISSOLVED 626 100.000 OG/L INICPDISFE LEAD -DISSOLVED ND 25.000 OG/L DI. INGFAADIPB MAGNESIUM -DISSOLVED 773000 7250.000 OG/L N. INICPDISCG MANGANESE -DISSOLVED 1550 15.000 UC/L INICPDISCM MERCURY -DISSOLVED ND 0.200 OG/L INCVAADIHG POTASSIUM -DISSOLVED 15300 5000.000 OG/L INFAADISXX SELENIUM -DISSOLVED ND 25.000 VO/L DL INOFAADI5E SILVER -DISSOLVED ND 25.000 UC/L INICPDXSCG 500I0M-DISSOLVED 408000 5000.000 CG/L INICPDISNA SUB -CONTRACT DATA: GROSS ALPHA 43.2 0.100 PCI/L +/- SBALPHBETA GROSS BETA 102 0..100 PCI/L +/- SBALPHBETA RADIUM 226 3.7 0.100 PCI/L +/- SB SBRA226228 RADIUM 226 -STANDARD DEVIATION 1.1 PCI/L +1- SB SBRA226228 RADIUM 228 .4 0.100 PCl/L +/- SB SBRA226228 RADIUM 228 -STANDARD DEVIATION .4 PCI/L +/- 5B SBRA226228 STANDARD DEVIATION -GROSS ALPHA 55.6 PCI/L 4/- SBALPHBETA STANDARD DEVIATION -GROSS BETA 62.1 PCI/L +/- SBALPHBETA SEMI -VOLATILE ORGANICS: 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOXYACETIC ACID - ND 1.000 00/L SVGC2HRB01 2-(2,4,5-TRICHLOROPMENOXY)PROPIONIC ACID ND 1.000 00/1, SVGC2HRB01 ENDRIN ND 0.100 OG/L SVGCIOCP01 LINDANE (GAMMA-BHC) ND 0.050 UGIL SVGCIOCP01 METHOXYCHLOR ND 0.500 OG/L SVGC10CP01 TOXAPHENE ND 1.000 CG/L SVGC10CP01 NA - Not Analyze, ND - Not Detected TAE - Trip Blank Item Additional Comment Explanations (NO/DL) ALKALINITY, CARBONATE CARBONATE ALKALINITY IS 0 MG/L BECAUSE SAMPLE PH < 8.3. SULFATE Dilution factor 50 applied. CALCIUM -DISSOLVED Dilution factor 5 applied. LEAD -DISSOLVED Dilution factor 05 applied. MAGNESIUM -DISSOLVED Dilution factor 5 applied. SELENIUM -DISSOLVED Dilution factor OS applied. SBRA226228 CORE 931061 Site: 488 — Central Weld County Sanitary Landfill Weld County Road 271/2 Miliken CO 80543 ma ENVIRONMENTAL. MONITORING LABORATORIES, INC CLIENT REPORT Sample Point: GWMW12 Sample Type: WELL Sample Number: AF2931 Page: 30 ENS: 92-11933 Sampled: 17 -JCL -1992 MP: 488921 Received: 18-JUL-1992 REV: 00 Reported: 2-SEP-1992 anelyte Result EMC. RL Units Comments Metbod VOLATILE ORGANICS: 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE • ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ND 2.000 UG/L VOMSAAX424 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE ND 1.000 VG/I. VOMSAAX424 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE ND 3.000 OG/L V0MSAAX424 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE ND 2.000 OG/L V0MSAAX424 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE ND 2.000 OG/L V0MSAAX424 1,4-DICHLORO-2-BOTENE(TOTAL) ND 2.000 DG/L VOMSAAX424 1,4-DIFLOOROBENZENE NA DG/L VOMSAAX424 2-B0TAN0NE 2-CHLOROETHYLVINYL ETHER ND ND 20.000 5.000 CG/1. UG/L ST VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 2-MEXANONE ND 4.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 4-BROMOFLOOROBENZENE ND 0.800 OG/L VOMSAAX424 4 -METHYL -2-PENTANONE ND 5.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 ACETONE ND 25.000 OG/L V0MSAAX424 ACROLEIN ND 10.000 DG/L PY VCMSOAX101 ACRYLONITRILE ND 10.000 OG/L PY VOMSDNA�(C101 BENZENE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 BROMOCHLOROMETHANE ND 2.000 UG/L VOMSAAX424 BROMODICHLOROMETHANE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 BROMOFORM ND 1.000 DGIL VOMSAAX424 BROMOMETHANE ND 2.000 OG/L V0MSAAX424 CARBON DISULFIDE ND 3.000 OG/L V0MSAAX424 CARBON TETRACHLORIDE ND 1.000 CG/L V0MSAAX424 CHLOROBENZENE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 CHLOROETHANE ND 3.000 OG/L V0MSAAX424 CHLOROFORM ND 2.000 UG/L VOMSAAX424 CHLOROMETHANE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 CIS -1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 DIBROM0CHLOROMETHANE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 DIBROMOMETHANE ND 1.000 DG/L VOMSAAX424 DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE ND 2.000 DG/I. VOMSAAX424 ETHANOL ND 100.000 00/L PY VOMSDAX101 ETHYL METHACRYLATE ND 10.000 DG/L PY VOMSDAX10I ETHYLBENZENE ND 1.000 OWL V0MSAAX424 IODOMETHANE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 METHYLENE CHLORIDE ND 3.000 =IL VOMSAAX424 STYRENE ND 1.000 UG/L VOMSAAX424 TETRACHLOROETHENE - ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 TOLUENE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 TRANS -1,2-DICHLOROETHENE ND 3.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 TRANS -I,3-DICHLOROPROPENE ND 1.000 CG/L VOMSAAX424 TRICHLOROETHENE NO 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 TRICHLOROFLOOROMETHANE ND 2.000 UG/L VOMSAAX424 VINYL ACETATE ND 4.000 UOIL VOMSAAX424 VINYL CHLORIDE ND 2.000 OG/L V0MSAAX424 XYLENE(TOTAL) ND 2.000 04/1 VOMSAAX424 NA - Not Analyzed ND - Not Detected TSK - Trip Blank 931061 Site: 488 - Central Weld County Sanitary Landfill Weld County Road 271/2 Miliken CO 80543 ma ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING LABORATORIES, INC CLIENT REPORT Sample Point: GWMW13 Sample Type: WELL Sample Number: AF2929 Page: 31 ENS: 92-11933 Sampled: 16-JVL-1992 MD?: 488921 Received: 17-JUL-1992 REV: 00 Reported: 2-SEP-1992 Analyte Result EMI. RL Units Comments Method FIELD DATA: DEPTH TO WATER FROM TOP OF CASING GROUNDWATER ELEV. PH FIELD PH FIELD PR FIELD PM YIELD SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD WATER TEMPERATURE IN DEGREES CELSIUS WELL DEPTH TOTAL - CHEMICAL METHODS i ROBOTICS: Aleavell = '5108 4767.10 7.87 7.86 7.82 7.80 3000. 2980. 3000. 3030. 12.8 61.89 FT FT MSL PH OMITS PH UNITS PH UNITS PH UNITS UMHOS/CM OMHOS/CM VMHOS/Q4 OMH05/CM DEGREES C FT FDWDTWTC01 FDWCWELWDT FDPHQOADO1 FDPHQUADO1 FDPHQUADO1 FDPHQUADO' FDSPCONDO4 FDSPCONDO4 FDSPCONDO4 FDSPCONDO4 FDXTEMPCO1 FDWGWELWDT ALEALINITY,BICARBONATE 219 10.000 MG/L CRALXBIC01 ALEALINITY, CARBONATE ND 10.000 MG/L NO CPALEC03O1 CHLORIDE 12.1 0.500 MG/L CRCHLORIO1 NITROGEN, AMMONIA 0.38 0.020 M.G/L CRN2NHJXC1 NITROGEN, NITRATE ND 0.050 MOIL CRN03HYD01 SULFATE 1400 100.000 MG/L DL CBSOLFATO1 INORGANICS: ARSENIC -DISSOLVED ND 10.000 OG/L INGFAADIAS BARIUM -DISSOLVED ND 200,000 UG/L INICPDISBA CADMIUM -DISSOLVED ND 5.000 00/1, INICPDISCD CALCIUM -DISSOLVED 359000 5000.000 00/L INICPDISCA CHROMIUM -DISSOLVED ND 10.000 DG/L INICPDISCR IRON -DISSOLVED ND 100.000 OC/L INICPDISFE LEAD -DISSOLVED ND 25.000 OG/L DI. INGFAADIPB MAGNESIUM -DISSOLVED 243000 7250.000 OG/L DL INICPDISMG MANGANESE -DISSOLVED 568 15.000 DG/L INICPDISFN MERCURY -DISSOLVED ND 0.200 UC/L INCVAADIHG POTASSIUM -DISSOLVED 7110 5000.000 OG/L INFAADISXX SELENIUM -DISSOLVED ND 50.000 UG/L DL INGFAADISE SILVER -DISSOLVED NO 25.000 OG/L INICPDISAG SODIUM -DISSOLVED 106000 5000.000 UG/L INICPDISNA SOB -CONTRACT DATA: GROSS ALPHA 34.1 0.100 PCI/L +/- SBALPHBETA GROSS BETA ND 0.100 PCl/L +/- SBALPHBETA RADIUM 226 2 0.100 PCI/L +/- SB - SBRA226228 RADIUM 226 -STANDARD DEVIATION .9 PCI/L +/- SB SBRA226228 RADIUM 220 ND 0.100 PCI/L +/- SB SBRA226228 RADIUM 229 -STANDARD DEVIATION STANDARD DEVIATION -GROSS ALPHA STANDARD DEVIATION -GROSS BETA SEMI -VOLATILE ORGANICS: 2.5 22.6 20.9 PCI/L +/- PCl/L +/- PCl/L +/- SB SBRA226228 SBALPHBETA SBALPHSETA 2,4-DICHLORO➢HENOXYACETIC ACID ND 1.000 UG/L SVGC2HRB01 2-(2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOXY)PROPIONIC ACID ND 1.000 OG/L SVGC2HRBO1 ENDRIN ND 0.100 OG/L SVCCIOCP01 LINDANE (GAMMA-BHC) ND 0.050 OC/L SVGC1oCPO1 METHOXYCHLOR ND 0.500 OG/L SVGC1OCP01 TOXAPRENE ND 1.000 OG/L SVGC10CP01 NA - Not Analyzed ND - Not Detected TEE - Trip Blank Item Additional 0:meant Explanations (NO/DL) ALHALINITY, CARBONATE SULFATE LEAD -DISSOLVED MAGNESIUM -DISSOLVED SELENIUM -DISSOLVED SBRA226228 CARBONATE ALEALINITY I5 0 MG/L BECAUSE SAMPLE PH t 8,3. Dilution factor 20 applied. . Dilution factor 05 applied. , Dilution factor 5 applied. Dilution factor 10 applied. CORE LI /C1 Site: 488 — Central Weld County Sanitary Landfill Weld County Road 271/2 Miliken CO 80543 act ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING LABORATORIES, INC CLIENT REPORT Sample Point: GWMW13 Sample Type: NELL Sample MaEber: AF2929 Page: 32 ENS: 92-11933 Sampled: 16-JUL-1992 MN: 488921 Received: 17 -JCL -1992 REV: 00 Reported: 2-SEP-1992 Analyte Result ENL RI Unite Comments Method VOLATILE ORGANICS: 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE - ND 1.000 UG/L VOMSAAX424 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE ND 3.000 0G/L . VOMSAAX424 1.1-DICHLOROETHENE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 1,2,3-TRICRLOROPROYANE ND 2.000 VG/1, VOMSAAX424 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE ND 2.000 oG/L VOMSAAX424 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE ND 2.000 0G/L VONSAAX424 1.4-DICHLORO-2-HUTENE(TOTAL) ND 2.000 OC/L V0t1SAAX424 1.4-DIFLOOROBENZENE NA OG/L VOMSAAX424 2-BOTANONE ND 20.0,00 OG/L VOMSAAX424 2-CHLOROETHYLVINYL ETHER ND 5.000 OC/L ST VOMSAAX424 2-HEXANONE ND 4,000 OG/L V0MSAAX424 4-HROM0FLOOROBENZENE ND 0.800 O0/L V0MSAAX424 4 -METHYL -2 -PENTANONE ND 5.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 ACETONE ND 25.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 ACROLEIN ND 10.000 OG/L VOMSDAX101 ACRYLONITRILE NO 10.000 OG/L VOMSDAX101 -BENZENE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 BROMOCHLOROMETHANE ND 2.000 OWL VOMSAA1t424 BROMODICHLOROMETNANE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 BROMOFORM ND 1.000 OC/L VONSAAX424 BROMOMETHANE ND 2.000 OG/L VOM5AAX424 CARBON DISULFIDE ND 3.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 CARBON TETRACHLORIDE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 CHLOROBENZENE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 CHLOROETHANE ND 3.000 130/1. VOMSAAX424 CHLOROFORM ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 CHLOROMETHANE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 CIS -1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE ND 1.000 0G/L VOMSAAX424 DLBROMOCHLOROMETHANE ND 1.000 UG/L VOMSAAX424 DIBROMOMETHANE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 DICHLORODIFLOOROMETHANE ND 2.000 OG/L V0MSAAX424 ETHANOL ND 100.000 00/L VOMSDAX101 ETHYL METHACRYLATE ND 10.000 OG/L VOMSDAXIDI ETHYLBENZENE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 IODOMETHANE ND 2.000 OG/L VONSAAX424 METHYLENE CHLORIDE ND 3.000 00/L VOMSAAX424 STYRENE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 TETRACHLOROETHENE ND 1.000 00/1 VOMSAAX424 TOLUENE. ND 1.000 00/1. V0MSAAX424 TRANS -I,2-DICHLOROETHENE ND 3.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 TRANS -1,.3-DICHLOROPROPENE ND • 1.000 CC/L V0MSAAX424 TRICHLOROETHENE ND 1.000 OG/L V0MSAAX424 TRICHLOROFLOOROMETHANE ND 2.000 UG/L VOI4SAAX424 VINYL ACETATE ND 4.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 VINYL CHLORIDE ND 2.000 DG/L VOMSAAX424 XYLENE(TOTAL) ND 2.000 OWL V0MSAAX424 MA - Not Analyzed ND - Not Detected WIC •• Trip Blank 931061 Site: 488 — Central Weld County Sanitary Landfill Weld County Road 271/2 Miliken CO 80543 au ENVIRONNEN AL MONITORING LABORATORIES, INC CLIENT REPORT Sample Point: GWMW14 Sample Type: WELL Sample Number: AF2938 Page: 33 ENS: 92-11933 Sampled: 21-JUL-1992 NP: 488921 Received: 23-JUL-1992 REV: 00 Reported: 2-SEP-1992 Analyte Result EM. RL Units Comments Method FIELD DATA: DEPTH TO WATER FROM TOP OF CASING GROUNDWATER ELEV. - PH FIELD PH FIELD PH FIELD PH FIELD SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD SPECIFIC CONDOCTANCE FIELD SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD WATER TEMPERATURE IN DEGREES CELSIUS WELL DEPTH TOTAL CREIICAL METHODS L ROBOTICS: 'rtur'7"i5 FT FT MLSL PH UNITS PE UNITS PM UNITS PR UNITS UWIOS/CM UMSOS/CM OM(OS/CM UM(OS/CM DEGREES C FT FONDTWTC01 FDWGWELWDT FDPHOUADO1 FDPHQUADOI FDPHQOADO1 FDPHQOADOI FDSPCONDO4 £DSPCONDO4 FDSPCONDO4 FDSPCONDO4 FDXTEMPC01 FUWGWELWDT 4756.35 7.27 7.26 7,26 7„31 4400. 4300. 4310. 4340. 16.1 62.46 ALKALINITY, BICARBONATE 197. 10,000 MG/L CRALNBIC01 ALKALINIT.Y,CARSONATE CHLORIDE NITROGEN, AMMONIA NITROGEN, NITRATE ND 19.3 0.40 ND 10,000 0.500 0.020 0.050 MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L NO CRALEC0301 CRCHLORIO1 CRN2NR3X02 CRN03HYQQO1 SULFATE INORGANICS: 3110 100.000 MC/L DL CRSOLFATO1 ARSENIC -DISSOLVED ND 10.000 UG/L INGFAADIAS BARIUM -DISSOLVED CADMIUM -DISSOLVED CALCIUM -DISSOLVED CHROMIUM -DISSOLVED IRON -DISSOLVED ND ND 453000 ND 652 200.000 5.000 5000.000 10.000 100.000 UG/L OG/L UG/L OG/L UG/L INICPDISCA INICPDISCD INICPDISCA INICPDI50R INICPDI5FE LEAD -DISSOLVED ND 25.000 0G/L DL INGFAADIPB MAGNESIUM -DISSOLVED MANGANESE -DISSOLVED MERCURY -DISSOLVED POTASSIUM -DISSOLVED 423000 1070 ND 9320 7250.000 15.000 0.200 5000.000 UG/L CO/L UG/L OG/L DI, INICPDI5MG INICPDISCN INCVAADIHG INFAADISXX SELENIUM -DISSOLVED SILVER -DISSOLVED SODIUM -DISSOLVED SUB -CONTRACT DATA: ND ND 225000 25.000 25.000 5000.000 OG/L DG/L OG/L DL INCFAADISE INICPDISCG INICPDISCA GROSS ALPHA ND 0.100 PCl/L +/- SBALPHBETA GROSS BETA 15 0.100 PCI/L +/- SBALPHBETA RADIUM 226 RADIUM 226 -STANDARD DEVIATION 3.6 0.5 0.100 PCl/L +/- PCI/L +/- 5B SB SBRA226228 S8RA226229 RADIUM 228 RADIUM 228 -STANDARD DEVIATION STANDARD DEVIATION -GROSS ALPHA STANDARD DEVIATION -GROSS BETA SEMI -VOLATILE ORGANICS: 0.5 1.2 24 18 0.100 PCI/L +/- PCl/L +/- PCI/L +/- PCI/L +/- SB SB SBRA226228 SBRA226223 SBALPHBETA SBALPHBETA 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOXYACETIC ACID ND 1.000 OG/L SVGC2HRB01 2-(2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOXY)PROPIONIC ACID ENDRIN LINDANE (GAMMA-BHC) METROXYCHLOR TOXAPHENE ND ND ND ND ND 1.000 0.100 0.050 0.500 1.000 OC/L OG/L OG/L OWL OG/L SVGC2HRB01 $VGCIOCP01 SVCCIOCP01 SVGCIOCPOI SVGC10CP01 - Not Analyrs ND - Not Detected IBS - Trip Blank Item Additional Comment Explanations (NQ/OL) ALKALINITY, CARBONATE SULFATE LEAD -DISSOLVED MAGNESIUM -DISSOLVED SELENIUM -DISSOLVED SBRA226228 CARBONATE ALKALINTY 0 MG/L BECAUSE SAMPLE PH <8.3 Dilution factor 20 applied. Dilution factor 05 applied. Dilution factor 5 applied. Dilution factor 05 applied. CORE 931061 /C1 Site: 488 — Central Weld County Sanitary Landfill Weld County Road 271/2 Miliken CO 80543 9u ENVIRONMENTAL IWDNITORYNG LABORATORIES, INC CLIENT REPORT Sample Point: 011MW14 Sample Type: WELL sample Number: AF2938 Page; 34 EAS: 92-11933 Saspled: 21-JOL-1992 NP:. 488921 Received: 23-JUL-1992 REV: 00 Reported: 2-SEP-1992 Analyte Result EML RE Units Comments Method VOLATILE ORGANICS: 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1,1,2-TRICHL0R0ETHANE 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE 1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 1,4-DICHLORO-2-BUTENE(TOTAL) 1,4-DIFLUOROBENZENE 2-BOTANONE 2-CHLOROETHYLVINYL ETHER 2-HEXANONE 4-BROMOFLOOROBENZENE 4 -METHYL -2-PENTANONE ACETONE ACROLEIN ACRYLONITRILE BENZENE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE BROMOFORM BROMOMETHANE CARBON DISULFIDE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE CHLOROBENZENE CHLOROETHANE CHLOROFORM CHLOROMETHANE CIS -1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE DIBROMOMETHANE DICHLORODIFLOOROMETHANE ETHANOL ETHYL METHACRYLATE ETHYLBENZENE IODOMETHANE METHYLENE CHLORIDE STYRENE , TETRACHLOROETHENE TOLUENE TRANS -1,2 -DICHLOROETHENE TRANS -1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE TRICHLOROETHENE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE- VINYL ACETATE VINYL CHLORIDE XYLENE(TOTAL) - - ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NA ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND .ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 2.000 2.000 1.000 3.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 20.000 5.000 4.000 0.800 5.000 25.000 10.000 10.000 1.000 2.000 1.000 1.000 2.000 3.000 1.000 1.000 3.000 2.000 2.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 2.000 100.000 10.000 1.000 2.000 3.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 3.000 1.000 1.000 2.000 4.000 2.000 2.000 OC/L OG/L OG/L D'G/L OG/L OG/L OG/L OC/L OG/L OG/L OG/L OG/L OG/L OG/L OG/L 00/1 OG/L OG/L OG/L OG/L OO/L O0/L CC/L OG/L 00/L 00/L OG/L OG/L OWL OC/I. OG/L OC/L OG/L OG/L UG/L OG/L OC/L OG/L UG/L 00/I. OG/L OG/L UG/L OG/L OG/L OG/L OC/L OG/L - MX,5T PY PY PY PY - . VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 V0MSAAX424 V0MSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 V0MSAAX424 V0MSAAX424 VOM5AAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSDAX101 VOMSDAXI01 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 V0MSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOM5AAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 V0MSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSDAX101 VOMSDAX101 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 V0MSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 V0MSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 V0MSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 NA - Not Analyzed ND - Not Detected TBIC - Trip niank 931061 Site: 48B — Central Weld County Sanitary Landfill Weld County Road 271/2 Miliken CO 80543 • Page: 37 1MM ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING LABORATORIES, INC CLIE Sample Sample Sample NT REPORT Point: TBK-CWMW01 ENS: 92-11933 Sampled: 16-JDL- 1992 Type: WELL 1R: 488921 Received: 17-JUL-1992 Number: A£2926 NEV: 00 Reported: 2-SEP-1992 Analyte Result EMI. RL Guts Comments Method VOLATILE ORGANICS: 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE ND 2.000 OG/L V0MSAAX424 1.1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ND 2.000 OC/L VOMSAAX4Z4 1,1,2-TRICRLOROETHANE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE ND 3.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 1.2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE ND 2.000 OG/L V0MSAAX424 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 1,2-DICHLOR0PR0PANE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 1,4-DICHLORO-2-BOTENE(TOTAL) ND 2.000 00/1. VOMSAAX424 1,4-DIFLOOROBENZENE NA OCR. VOMSAAX424 2-BOTANONE ND 20.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 2-CHLOROETHYLVXNYL ETHER ND 5.000 OWL VOMSAAX424 2-HEXANONE ND 4.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 4-BROMOFLDOROBENZENE ND 0.800 CC/L VOMSAAX424 4 -METHYL -2 -PENTANONE ND 5.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 ACETONE NO 25.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 BENZENE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 BROMOCHLOR0:4ETHANE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 BROMODICHLOROMETHANE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 BROMOFORM ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 BROMOMETMANE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 CARBON DISOLFIDE ND 3.000 aG/L VOMSAAX424 CARSON TETRACHLORIDE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 CHLOROSENZENE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 CHLOROETHANE ND 3.000 OG/L V0MSAAX424 CHLOROFORM ND 2.000 OC/L VOMSAAX4Z4 CHLOROMETHANE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 CIS -1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE ND 1.000 OC/I. VOMSAAX424 DIBROMOCHLORONETHANE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 DIBROMOMETNANE ND 1.000 OC/L VOMSAAX424 DICHLORODIFLDOROMETHANE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 ETHYLBENZENE ND 1.000 OC/L V0MSAAX424 IODOMETHANE ND 2.000 DG/L V0MSAAX424 METHYLENE CHLORIDE ND 3.000 OC/L VOMSAAX424 STYRENE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 TETRACHLOROETHENE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 TOLOENE ND 1.000 OG/I. VOMSAAX424 TRANS -1,2 -DICHLOROETHENE ND 3.000 OG/L V0MSAAX424 TRANS -1.3 -DICHLOROPROPENE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 TRICHLOROETHENE ND 1.000 CG/L VOMSAAX424 TRICHLOROFLDOROMETHANE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 VINYL ACETATE ND 4.000 OG/L V0MSAAX424 VINYL CHLORIDE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 XYLENE(TOTAL) ND 2.000 CG/I. VOMSAAX424 NA - Not Analyzed ND - Not Detected Tat - Trip Blank 931061 Site: 488 — Central Weld County Sanitary Landfill Weld County Road 271/2 M liken CO 80543 Page: 38 lea ENVIRONMENTAL MONXTORING LABORATORIES, INC C'L I E N T REPORT Sample Point: TBX-CWMW03 ENS: 92-11933 Sampled: 15-JUL-1992 Sample Type: NELL NP: 488921 Received: 29-,70L-1992 Sample 'ember: AF2924 REV: 00 Reported: 2-SEP-1992 'Analyte Result EKE, RL Unite Comments method VOLATILE ORGANICS: 1,1,1-TRICHLORO£THANE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE ND 3.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE ND 2.000 OG/L V0MSAAX424 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 1,4-DICHLOR0-2-BUTENE(TOTAL) ND 2.000 OG/L V0MSAAX424 1,4-DIFLOOROBENZENE 2-BUTANDNE _ NA ND 20,000 OG/L OG/L V0MSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 2-CHLOROETHYLVINYL ETHER ND 5.000 00/L ST VOMSAAX424 2-HEXANONE ND 4.000 VG/I. V0MSAAX424 4-BROMOFLOOROBENZENE .._ ND 0.800 OG/L VOMSAAX424 4 -METHYL -2 -PENTANONE ND 5.000 OG/I. VOMSAAX424 ACETONE -- ND 25.000 .aG/L VOMSAAX424 BENZENE ND 1.000 OG/L V0MSAAX424 BROMOCHLOROMETHANE ND 2.000 OC/L VOMSAAX424 BROMODICHLGROMETHANE ND 1.000 OG/L V0M3AAA74424 BROMOFOPM ND 1.000 OC/L VOM3AAX424 BROMOMETHANE ND 2.000 UG/L VOMSAAX424 CARBON DISULFIDE ND 3.000 00/L VOMSAAX424 CARBON TETRACHLORIDE ND 1.000 COIL VOMSAAX424 CHLOROBENZENE ND 1.000 Dan, VOMSAAX424 CHLOROETHANE ND 3.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 CHLOROFORM ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 CHLOROMETHANE ND 2.000 CO/L VOMSAAX424 CIS -1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE ND 1.000 UG/L VOMSAAX424 DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE ND 1.000 OC/L VOMSAAX424 DIBROMOMETHANE ND 1.000 OG/L VONSAAX424 DICHLORODIFLOOROMETHANE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 ETHYLBENZENE ND 1.000 00/1 VOMSAAX424 IODOMETHANE ND 2.000 UG/L VOMSAAX424 METHYLENE CHLORIDE ND 3.000 UG/L VOMSAAX424 STYRENE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 TETRACHLOROETHENE ND 1.000 UG/I, VOMSAAX424 TOLUENE ND 1.000 UC/L VOMSAAX424 TRANS -1,2-DICHL0R0ETHENE ND 3.000 UG/L VOMSAAX424 TRANS -1.3 -DICNLOROPROPENE ND 1.000 OG/L V0MSAAX424 TRICHLOROETHENE ND 1.000 00/1 VOMSAAX424 TRICHLOAOFLUOROMETHANE ND 2.000 00/L VOMSAAX424 VINYL ACETATE - ND 4.000 O0/L VOMSAAX424 VINYL CHLORIDE ND 2.000 00/I, VOMSAAX424 XYLENE(TOTAL) _ ND 2.000 OC/L VOMSAAX424 NA - Not Analyzed ND - Not Detected TAE - Trip Blank 931061 Site: 408 — Central Weld County Sanitary Landfill weld County Road 271/2 Miliken CO 80543 Page: 39 act ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING LABORATORIES, D9C CLIENT REPORT Sample Point: 13X-Gi4Mw05 ENS: 92-11933 Sampled: 21-JUL-1992 Sample Type: NELL MP: 488921 Received: 22 -JCL -1992 Sample Member: AF2936 REV: 00 Reported: 2-SEP-1992 Analyte Result DC. RL Units Consents Method VOLATILE ORGANICS: 1,1.1-TRICHLOROETHANE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETRANE ND 1.000 OC/L VOMSAAX424 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE ND 3.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE ND 2.000 DC/L VOMSAAX424 1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 1,2-OICHLOROETHANE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 1,2-OICHLOROPROPANE ND 2.000 DG/L VOMSAAX424 1,4-DICHLORO-2-BDTENE(TOTAL) ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 1,4-DIFLOOROBENZENE 2-BOTANONE NA ND 20,000 DG/L OG/L VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 2-CHLOROETHYLVINYL ETHER ND 5.000 DG/L ST VOMSAAX424 2-HEXANONE ND 4.000 DG/L VOMSAAX424 4-BROMOFLOOROSENZENE ND 0.800 OG/L VOMSAAX424 4 -METHYL -2 -PENTANONE ND 5.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 ACETONE ND 25.000 DG/L VOMSAAX424 BENZENE ND 1,000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 BROMOCHLOROMETHANE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 BROMODICHLOROMETHANE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 BROMOFORM ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAXC124 BROMOMETHANE ND 2.000 00/L VOMSAAX424 CARBON DISULFIDE ND 3.000 DG/I. VOMSAAX424 CARBON TETRACHLORIDE ND 1.000 DC/L VOMSAAX424 CHLOROBENZENE ND 1.000 DG/L VOMSAAX424 CHLOROETHANE ND 3.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 CHLOROFORM ND 2.000 OG/L V0MSAAX424 CHLOROMETHANE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE ND 1.000 DG/L VOMSAAX424 OIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE ND 1.000 DG/L VOMSAAX424 DIBROMOMETHANE ND 1.000 DG/L VOmsAAX424 DICHLORODIFLDOROMETHANE ND 2.000 OG/L V0MSAAX424 ETHYLBEN2ENE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 I0D0METHANE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 METHYLENE CHLORIDE ND 3.000 DC/L VOMSAAX424 STYRENE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 TETBACHLOROETHENE ND 1.000 DO/L VOMSAAX424 TOLUENE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 TRANS -I,2-DICHLOROETHENE ND 3.000 00/1. VOMSAAX424 TRANS -1,3 -DICHLOROPROPENE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 TRICRLOROETHENE ND 1.000 DG/L VOMSAAX424 TRICHLOROFLOOROMETHANE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 VINYL ACETATE ND 4.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 VINYL CHLORIDE ND 2.000 OG/L V0MSAAX424 XYLENE(TOTAL) ND 2.000 OG/L V0MSAAX424 NA - Not Analyzed ND - Not Detected TB& - Trip Blank 931061 Site: 488 — Central Weld County Sanitary Landfill Weld County Road 271/2 Miliken CO 80543 Page: 40 -C EnviRotagreTX, MONITORING LABORATORIES, INC CLIENT REPORT Sample Point: TBX-GWMN07 ENS: 92-11933 Sampled: 20-JIIL-1992 Sample Type; WELL MP: 488921 Received: 27-J0L-1992 Sample Member: AF2933 VEY: 00 Reported: 2-SEP-1992 Analyta Result C. RL Unit■ Comments method VOLATILE ORGANICS: 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE - 1.1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1,1.2-TRICHLOROETHANE 1.1-DICHLOROETHANE 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE 1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE ,,2-DICHLOROETNANE 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 1,4-,DICHLOR0-2-BOTENE(TOTAL) 1,4-DIFLOOROBENZENE 2-BOTANONE 2-CHLOROETHYLVINYL ETHER 2-HEXANONE 4-BROMOFLUOROBENZENE 4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE ACETONE BENZENE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE BROMOFORM BROMOMETHANE CARBON DISULFIDE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE CHLOROBENZENE CHLOROETHANE CHLOROFORM CHLOROMETHANE CZS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE DIBROMOMETHANE DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE ETHYLBENZENE IODOMETHANE METHYLENE CHLORIDE STYRENE TETRACHLOROETHENE TOLUENE TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE TRANS-I,3-DICHLOROPROPENE TRICHLOROETNENE TRICHLOROFLOOROMETHANE VINYL ACETATE VINYL CHLORIDE XYLENE(TOTAL) - • _ --' ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NA ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 2.000 2,000 1,000 3.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 2,000 20.000 5.000 4.000 0.800 5.000 25.000 1.000 2.000 1.000 1.000 2.000 3.000 1.000 1.000 3.000 2.000 2.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 2.000 1.000 2.000 3.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 3.000 1.000 1.000 2.000 4.000 2.000 2.000 OG/L OG/L OG/L OC/L OC/L OG/L OG/L OWL OG/L OG/L 00/1 aG/L OG/L CG/L OG/L OG/L 0G/L 00/L OG/L OG/L OC/L OG/L OC/L 0G/L OG/L 00/1 OG/L OG/L OC/L OG/L CO/L OG/L OG/L OG/L OG/L aG/L 170/1. DO/L OG/L OG/L OG/L OG/L OG/L OG/L - ST VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 V0MSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 V0MSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 V0NSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 V0MSAAX424 V0MSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 V0MSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 V0MSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 V0MSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 V0MSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 NA - Not Analyzed NO - Not Detected TBE - Trip Blank 931061 Site: 488 — Central Weld County Sanitary Landfill Weld County Road 271/2 Miliken CO 80543 Page: 41 R4Q ENVZRONIO:N'r'AL ICNITORINC L?ZORATOPXE5, II4C CLIENT REPORT Sample Point: TB£-GWHK12 ENS: 92-11933 Sampled: 17-JUL-1992 Sample Type: WELL MP 488921 Received: 18-JUL-1992 Sample NUmbe:t: AF2931 REV: 00 Reported: 2-SEP-1992 Analyte Result NHL RL Units Comments Method VOLATILE ORGANICS: 1.1,1-TRICHLOROETHENE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHENE 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE 1,1-OICHLOROETHENE 1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE ND ND ND ND 1.000 3.000 2.000 2.000 DG/L OG/L OG/L OC/L VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 V0MSAAX424 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE ND 2.000 OG/L - VOMSAAX424 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE ND 2.000 OC/L VOMSAAX424 1,4-DICHLORO-2-BOTENE(TOTAL) 1,4-DIFLOOROBENZENE 2-BUTANONE ND NA ND 2.000 20.000 OC/L OG/L 00/L VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 2-CHLOROETHYLVINYL ETHER 2-HEXANONE 4-BROMOFLOOROBENZENE 4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE ACETONE ND ND ND ND ND 5.000 4.000 0.800 5.000 25.000 OC/L OG/L UG/L OG/L OG/L ST VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 BENZENE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE BROMOFORN - BROMOMETNANE CARBON DISULFIDE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE CHLOROBENZENE CHLOROETHANE CHLOROFORM CHLOROMETNANE CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1.000 2.000 1.000 1.000 2.000 3.000 1.000 1.000 3.000 2.000 2.000 1.000 1.000 OG/L OG/L OG/L OC/L OG/L OG/L 00/L OG/L OC/L ' OC/L OG/L OG/L 00/1 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOmski 424 VOMSAAX424 V0MSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 DIBROMOMETHANE DICHLORODIFLOOROMETHANE ND ND 1.000 2.000 OG/L OC/L V0MSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 ETHYLBENZENE ND 1.000 OC/L V0MSAAX424 IODOMETHANE ND 2.000 OC/L VOMSAAX424 METHYLENE CHLORIDE STYRENE ND .ND 3.000 1.000 OC/L OG/L V0MSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 TETRACHLOROETHENE ND 1.000 OC/L VOMSAAX424 TOLUENE ND 1.000 OC/L V0MSAAX424 TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE TRICHLOROETHENE ND ND ND 3.000 1.000 1.000 OG/L CC/L Wit V0MSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 TRICHLOROFLOOROMETHANE VINYL ACETATE VINYL CHLORIDE XYLENE(TOTAL) ND ND ND ND 2.000 4.000 2.000 2.000 00/1 OC/L CG/L OG/L - VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 V0MSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 NA - Not Analyzed ND - Not Detected TEE - Trip Blank 931061 Site: 488 - Central Weld County Sanitary Landfill Weld County Road 271/2 MilIken CO 80543 Page: 42 1KI ENVIROWENT'AL MONITORING LABORATORIES, INC CLIENT REPORT Sample Point: TBK-GWMW14 ENS: 92-11933 Sampled: 21-JOL-1992 Sample Type: WELL MP: 488921 Received: 23-JUL-1392 Semple Number: AF2938 REV: 00 Reported: 2-SEP-1992 Analyte Result 9C RL Unite Comments Method VOLATILE ORGANICS: 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE ND 2.000 UG/L VOMSAAX424 1.1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ND 2.000 OC/L VOMSAAX424 1.1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE ND 1.000 OC/L VOMSAAX424 .1-DICHLOROETHANE ND 3,000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 ,1-DICHLOROETHENE ND 2.000 OC/L VOMSAAX424 L,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE ND 2.000 OG/I. VOMSAAX424 L.2-DICHLOROETHANE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 l,2-DICHLOROPRO➢ANE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 1,4-DXCHLORO-2-BOTENE(TOTAL) ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 1,4-DIFLOOROBENZENE 2-B0TANONE NA ND 20.000 OG/L OG/L VOMSAAX424 VOMSAAX424 2-CHLOROETHYLVINYL ETHER ND 5.000 OG/L ST VOMSAAX424 2-HEXANONE ND 4.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 4-BROMOFLOOROBENZENE ND 0.800 UG/L VOMSAAX424 4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE ND 5.000 OC/L VOMSAAX424 ACETONE ND 25.000 OC/L VOMSAAX424 BENZENE ND 1.000 0C/L VOMSAAX424 BR0M0CHLOROMETHANE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 BROMODICHLOROMETHANE ND 1.000 OC/L VOMSAAX424 BROMOFORM ND 1.000 DC/L VOMSAAX424 BROMOMETHANE ND 2.000 OC/L VOMSAAX424 CARBON DISULFIDE ND 3.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 CARBON TETRACHLORIDE ND 1.000 CO/L VOMSAAX424 CHLOROBENZENE ND 1.000 DC/L VOMSAAX424 CHLOROETHANE ND 3.000 OC/L VOMSAAX424 CHLOROFORM ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 CHLOROMETHANE ND 2.000 DO/L VOMSAAX424 CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE ND 1.000 DC/L VOMSAAX424 DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE ND 1.000 OC/L V0MSAAX424 DIBROMOMETHANE ND 1.000 OG/L V0MSAAX424 DICHLORODIFLOOROMETHANE ND 2.000 OC/L VOM5AAX424 ETHYLBENZENE ND 1.000 0G/L VOMSAAX424 IODOMETHANE ND 2.000 OC/L V0MSAAX424 METHYLENE CHLORIDE ND 3.000 OC/L VOMSAAX424 STYRENE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 TETRACHLOROETHENE ND 1.000 0C/L VOMSAAX424 TOLUENE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 TRANS-I,2—OXCHLOROETHENE ND 3.000 DC/L VOMSAAX424 TRANS-1,3—DICHLOROPROPENE ND 1.000 OG/a. VOMSAAX424 TRICHLOROETHENE ND 1.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 TRICHLcROFLOOROMETHANE ND 2.000 OG/L VOMSAAX424 VINYL ACETATE - ND 4.000 OC/L VOMSAAX424 VINYL CHLORIDE ND 2.000 OC/L V0MSAAX424 XYLENE(TOTAL) ND 2.000 DC/L VOMSAAX424 NA - Not Analyzed ND - Not Detected '..8E - Trip Blank 931061 s. Subcontract To: 1NM1 Environmental Monitoring Laboratories, Inc. FIELD CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY RECORD SITFJFACILITY sewer -1J. SITE NAME:'- Sample Point: k I 0/ re Sag*. Cade SAMPLE DATE: SAMPLE TIME: _ YT Wit 00 Liiii_Ljtk MATRIX CODE Source Coco you .. DevapteriNI M9,y)l etrvq RWN .... (01 9unee• Wow "e0unameM ... l I ENS $ 3. Name. Date: AquaPak" 4. e, Signature 5 LAB USE ONLY 1. Opened By: ()PINK! {A•onw 9YR•," .. (CI Ciao Conoentin... IA) AquaPale e.• • By: •rint) Signature: I have received these materials in g Condition from the above person. ,Signature: Remarks: _• PryfnylM.M1 POMMY • • fen Influent ........ •. MMMoen........... Cr) Fl w/!In-Maroc Goren........ CHAIN OF CUSTODY CHRONICLE Time Date: 2141-7-z-7-_ Moak" PREP AeueFile ps, teMelt f; Name: Date: - ,Y,a ahgve peace. I have received these materialstn good Signature' Remark i Seal #: intac Time: 2400 HR. 2400 HR. Co . 0 . Sea4S 8y Date: r r r 1r Seal #: • Site # 1• • WMI Environmental Monitoring Laboratories, Inc. FIELD INFORMATION FORM Bottle Set:Lair Z l 2 Sample Point: LW I "1 CI1 2 PURGING INFORMATION I9 zciIDEEiJ6 - -1±t1±ttt:ri 111 USG (n99D• MOOSTART PURIM 0909 Psi PURGING AND SAMPLING EQUIPMENT Purging Equipment Dedicated I Yokke r Sampling Equipment Ded Purging Device Sampling Device CA -Submersible Pump 8 -Peristaltic Pump C•Bladder Pump • D43as Uft Pump E -Venturi Pump F OipperiBottle Purging Material —6=1 C-Pblyprbp 4n. Sampling Material I f5 I3 -Stainless Steel D -PVC Tubing -Purging Tubing•Sampling �1 C -Rope X / Filtering Devices o.45 y:I 13 I A -In -line Disposable D-Poypropykne E -Polyethylene t3 -Pressure J -ltd ACTUAL 'Ca Map ro 11090”) w/RrOOrw(MOW, ftilloon n.V.n ana 00430.n 4 CeeribmMtion teflon/ X• _ PoifrorclNiono GYaca+le - aw$ ra.ac.h Well Elevation Depth to water From top of well casing Groundwater Elevation Well Dee, tat 3rd 4th ) tat O MEASUREMENTS (NArrel) Land Surface Eiatons Depth to was (ft) From land surface (wV) Groundwater Elevation (ft) Stickup cm 11.I)Inj at'°ra/25*c usw.cood. 2nd *I I III reset 2s* c Coed, 3r I 1 IIl Surnte me ro.e COMI. 4th I 1 I / IoL'k' C win cond. -a f Sample Temp. I 1 11161(' c) MAW INIFIONIRM Turbidity: / :"1.6 Sample Appearance: U wpc.krin Weather Conditions: winospews ( a 4 M owes, Specific Comments' JE44O ,& a. Jt �� R4tp Af'lfx. .i i .tarry aidir G SOM EGG 2e` ZC4-P vt/ C/ LL G+ fiV1j tai[ 1GV /1/�r 5'MBT0•r f FIELD COMMENTS odor: `4i Aft color 4106 Pra ci a o YQ outlook al din I I certify that samp . • proced .- . . in accordance with appticabtrEPA, State and WMI protocols 1� Employer. .Sc- 1)-•x 4^ L (044 ti I ILL PR7.4loo REGION : Subcontract To: HIM Environmental Monitoring, Laboratories, Inc. FIELD CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY RECORD SITE/FACILITYNIM88f'f<'1 SITE NAME: central Se1tgouges, Sample Point: SAMPLE DATE: - 1,1TiO171Z-i\l Y, I WI GO SAMPLE TIME I1 L I t f7j� I dl Source Codas. W4i ................ (WI O.MMHing/.f...ure RN111.... (OI Sueta 'Mawr impoundment ... (I) ENS 4* A02937 -C AF2937 -E .AF2937-F • ,l AF2931-c AP2997=-S- -1 AF293.7-I r `.•• " AF2437-J A 937-X 0100' LIKf.. System ..ICI OY Conoro n... (MI Alf (AI 92-;ly3a MATRIX CODE: 4,44 w4MIMM P.c,Ii,y ... (Ps IMluern 'LP) !Munk! IT) KM/SO'NM 4i.• a OcOe Oude AquaPak" CONTENT • ICI do gnpabdn 4 .... IC, 0Iy1 lr•o�lY ti lrI1 21....t4/Wit 3.r.. Wei FIELD "'". . COMMENTS 1 i,Si, : .. `vt "FYT}I!2 iI erti•JIMIIIIMIIII:aisl _ �.tY.. 21 4-7: CHAIN OF CUSTODY CHRONICLE ;Iyv ...Oa; • .'B 6afYSi w 51 H•t.Yna 'Y ♦! "0... • / ♦ •...y; AquaPak' Opened By: (print) Signature: Date:) /7/ /f1 Time: Seal 4: QO' I ZOSQ Intact 0 HP. I have received these materials in • • dition from the abo "` •n. 'o+lrM% 2. Name: -�w - 5ig na Date: / / ,*jhe: 11leinerksr• 2400 H. •, I have received these materials in_good condition from the above person. . 3. Name: Date: LA8 USE ONLY wOpened (r -9M"'" { " -..Da /1puaPak-/Sub, honor —1. , .*: i >jamd"ta, • Stgnaturr7 r Rema • r ). Environmental Monitoring Laboratories. Inc. HELD INFORMATIONS FORM 1 PURGING INFORMATION NPOE DICE kwr is COI Purging Equipment Site #J_ -I Bottle Set: 471"H 171 Sample Point: ki Sea Os 2 Fig SEW PuPlat WISED MIS ` NICER 10- Pad IC&S PURGING AND SAMPLING EQUIPMENT Dedlcatea-4- ^`4f . Sampling Equipment Dedicated I Y I Purging Device Sampling Device --L ubmersible Pump I I &Peristaltic Pump C -Bladder Pump Purging Material Sampling Material iThTeflon I 1 I B-Stainleea Steel Tubing -Purging Tubing -Sampling lu Mellon D -Gas LiftPump•' E•Venturi Pump F-Dippen6ottie Er w�erti Orw4A 19PeraY) D -Polypropylene FSBlcon X - N'°..° O,tEF i SPECIFY) B-Tygon t•�hylene C -Rope X- Wis(er, (erecan Filtering Devices 0.45 H 18 1 Mn-line Disposable B-PresiUre G.Combinatlon teflon/ X- Uhcu� MY sa OMEA Greco ) Well Elevation Depth to water From top of well casing Groundwater Elevation Well oeptf<t I ICA51It (5ro) $ p ~ ? 2nd I,I�IYI�'(STD) 3rd I_ 6Alt fi (STD) on ILEA (STD) on 1st 4th tri FIELD MEASUREMENTS Land Surface Elevation Depth to water From land surface Groundwater Elevation (It) Sticlhp at 2°5 um/cm 1st [ 1 n1/is* r C .wc C°ee m 2nd IL I I�%1fcat 25° C NEC. CPU. m 3rd II171(.1(i(at 2s° C a. cores.. m 4th 1 1170.1 eat 25• C WC COW. Sample ':amp. I-- 1 - i rc. a.us POMO (GS,' I1I Ij11�w I algii:1(° c) 1111'1 si) POPIPWWI 111111 u )aw.r wr.w1 FIELD COMMENTS Sample Appearance: - rJe _ Odor: _4/K ^^- Color: Turbidity 1. `"— Weather Conditions: wind speed _ C a r �'"E Thin Specific Comments: F.e/9 0o --k o'ri l 1c sr p�'j tin GM..n.,/oC ne.-1/o are pr.opwion Outlook P 71 C4+ .1. -,0-• :-,1 (/,G Ue esc.t LLM - .f'. 14U isfLe_°.. a preil/: I certify that sa• •.(n• p ..�. in accQ once with applicable EPA. State and WMl protocols. 21211.11 r - �i / r^ Employer; 5/C Drs L ° k L.../ 931061 3. Name: WMI •Gutxontract To:.—• Environmental Mpnitonng Laboratories. Inc. - FIELD CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY RECORD SITE/FACILITY i<Il$9T'4 .I SITE NAME:`Cstt 'i Stit "1Of , Sample Point: IC LAMINA 61 1 I &woe Cade SAMPLE DATE: - 11114)O111j j 1 ` I SAMPLE TIME' I I Source Comes' vnln . 0 bal•nnai..•pvre RNnl .. . • Surface WaMr Imoounam•nI . . ENS* n1:292e-E *F292t- P 4T2926 -G .P2926 -K .r292b-I SF292e-4 AF242E K (WI . (0) •(I) nr w.mm : 11 i 51 (74aa ..I ur:nm Sr.r•m . , ICI Gas cone•nul•...(MI Au A) 1.'433 MATRIX CODE: enenMirMnl F•euuv • (P1 Innu•m (U) tenement (r) Rn./SV.•m/ in. or Oa.. OuRaII AqusPak^ CC TENT • Aglarale Stesap _ sic tit are Err: f • 8�AI i e spq•�'l�fn�i4K"PST,�LsR�.�a.:w ,•s.'S,i.:..'1.. '..n 'se._'6f J . w'�`."a. .. ny,a. - de{;eh :4C a. I .1 w a. ZR (C) (x) - gal 1. 2. Name: • CHAIN OF CUSTODY CHRONICLE //✓/ // A Date: 7 / IL 192 Time: it• J • 4'oAquaPak" Opened By: (Prink) Q.1, �' 2400 HP.. ("7 Signature: Gy t Seal V. 7 .nf Intact Y y I have received these materials in g{tondltiOn from the abovei SOO n. ..1-'w:) .Sig nattier ,r x. Date: / . / .time: a - 2400 $R. - Remarks: ' I have received these materials in good Condition-kom the above person. SlgnaturW- Date: / tine 2400 HR, Rema AquaPak^/S 4_ Signature: rAL,Ar v74-,4.'Date Seal x: Tale; /7 :16. rr �" 2400 HR. Intact:.„.404,1• t LAB USE ONLY opened By. Ie. ne...'I -w, Site # l4 eH I W MI Environmental Monitoring Laboratories, Inc. Bottle Set: i llF1a19K 161 Sample Point: kiii4e f� I.N W p 1 FIELD INFORMATION FORM Purging Equipment PURGING INFORMATION Ii I I lob] L1111 I I11�1 minim ELAPSED in fa®14101:10 PU - AND SAMPLING EQUIPMENT Dedicated 19 I AV Sampling Equipment Purging Device Sampling Device Purging Material Sampling Material I `�' J A -Submersible Pump �J B -Peristaltic Pump C -Bladder Pump I .-Teflon ,.I 8 -Stainless Steel Tubing -Purging Tubing -Sampling ISM A-Teficin D•Polypropyiene .1Z!"--1 G -J Baygon . E-Poiyeiiytene � C -Rope X- f v fle keriti i. Filtering Devices 0.45 u:l'/ 1- A -in -line Disposable Pressure Well Elevation Depth to water From top of well casing Groundwater Elevation Well Dip" J��• I /M((�� 3 (STD) 1st 73 .(STD) 3rd 117j'rl011STD) 4th I PVIPI (sID) FIELD MEASUREMENTS W I81r Is48101wand 1 12zld7(n) wig') 11jl lU (turns) 11!Iv/137 I (n) 1st L1J31):Z; 2nd 1131313104 OM. COO. 3rd I_I3IM.101 •p°C. C000 - cc+u. ‘O urc nwou� ifipMrI Dedicate:Intl Y I IOW AMISS Ofl R (fraCV'.1 F-Siboon X _ - O -Combination teflon/ X- PdYprapylene GWcuum Land Surface Elevation Depth to water From land surface ; Groundwater Elevation Stickup um/cm at25°C iamkm at 250 C umfcm at25°C 4h 1131)1)14 2s''C spec cone. vwnno or_Es ante' 'MOW Oi.!° iffCW' Wok -NO CrIl•fji iencr' Sample Temp, I 11124 -44°C) I 1111L1i OF Orwrvl OPEI Ohm p (ftlmsl) II IIILII I_I FIELD COMMENTS Sample Appearance: `got «Gr Odor ,v.,r� Color pt.. . cp Weather Conditions: wine spied O 7 *WI ' amnion .e.... -SC P"c'0 'oa Specific Comments- fl re./ e)4/ 0 7 7 1-1. -_09:1I = 3W ? 7 ''rc 1. 1,/ - Jo ?,}/'/ 10. 3a tr 6-40502/r4 - 1.7a re si,:_) r7><t s S'. /9..p / P is Turbidity. //IA animal -7y( r-± 1 certify that sampli u w eeordence.with applicable EPA, State and WMI protocols. 7#4 P7 714.1. Employer C � Do .1,.• 9s31061 m.M scww 3. Name: 2. Name: Subcontract To: ® •• y W M I Environmental Monitoring Laboratories, Inc. FIELD CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY RECORD SITE/.FACILITY SITE NA 1; L.4e n+at Melic ar '- l .4I(�I t 1 1 i3 ' Sample Point: SAMPLE TIME 1 1 131 </ 10! MATRIX CODE: (WA MU Source Cooe5' Wee . . . . ........... cwt L..en.r. Sn..m .. IC1 nr.mrua.nr F.twte. • On eBNgln.ern/ 0...uamo.•r..wr. nee.' .... 101 GM Candwl..u... Oel MOW, IN La. er Ocean Surface Waller imaounam.ni • , . 19 Air IN Enw.m (TI Ourt ee ENS # •;• - 11933 AP2934- D'� AF2934-8 •,21 Al 934-C AP2934-H,. AFZ)34- AquaPak 1. Signatur I have received these materials in gaaRidition from the above* 1n. +��t�°-"' p1?,'` •r'j .. "3'4 " Ss'.SignattirC Date: tame: " Remarks•. • AquaPak" CONTENT CHAIN OF CUSTODY CHRONICLE RUM FIELD Y —N COMMENTS Time: /0 I have received these materials m.good condition from the above .paraon. -: Signatu Date: / / _ Time: - Rem.. 2400 HR. •AO 200 HR. Intact: ._tie{ 4 W M I Environmental Monitoring Laboratories. Inc. FIELD INFORMATION FORM Site # Bottle Set: J1 IA P Sample Point: u I� 2 8 1 3 rl 4-142. 9 ?KKK NnnE oaE fri rr 00) . SW W (2•m w aqua - PU Purging Equipment Dedicated I Y PURGING INFORMATION LLD -kJ WISED VMS I0Lw WING PRUw vault NOW AND SAMPLING EQUIPMENT Sampling Equipment Dedicated I V Irow Purging Device Sampling Device Purging Material Sampling Material Tubing -Purging Tubing -Sampling A.Submersible Pump 8-Periatattic Pump C•Bladder Pump 0 -Gas Lift Pump E -Venturi Pump FOipper/Battie Adeflon C -Polypropylene B -Stainless Steel 0 -PVC C-Fope X- r ` • a.. ' �ry�� Filtering Devices 045 N:l iaG.1- A-lndlne Disposable B -Pressure - FIELD MEASUtEMENTS Well Elevation Depth to water From top of well casing Groundwater Elevation 1_J Melon 0 -Pd C� B.1\,gon „/ / Eassetsosaie _„ � ion tenon/ X- /• (Q lie C Vacuum G Well Depth 1st 2nd I wal1STD) 3rd I f7P14/1(STD) 4th I 71 (STD) 91813J81612.j (furs30 I 1 LI 12,17191 (ft) Egli al Y 46181 (ft/mel) I 1 P13fIal(m 1st I Ia4610 141 a" 25 C ION . aaa, m 2nd! lals'1e1O1 at 25° C , ...c . co t 3rd I Rls-Io1 I zs C Land Surface Elevation Depth to water From land surface Groundwater Elevation Stickup em 112151ab1 :ant; c .Pt tda. X on.w ia.ic.n en.weanc .'i a.rns.0 on., isnc.n nwa.a an., ...Corn 4 ...rai.o Orman SWAM Sampb Temp. I I / 1431 C) (_- (ft/mel) (ft) (films') (It) LJ (f1111 U FIELD COMMENTS Sample Appearance:,c / Odor 1104—cs—c Color .'w11+-oa."'t Turbidity. 19 4 w0. /{ .., d. ire, S _ Pnt...WOO Ye aYlbuM C(4.- /4 4- Weather Conditions: wins spewZ aannb.. l Specific Comments T)Tir/ r / 3.9`/, 7i..C '23. —CZ z %? //ef c , s, 951 (0./63) _ / S� 71 ,- ras;t, /$C K 3 = y 7 7.1 L pk-y c I certify that srM n� P� in accordance with applicable EPA, State and WMI protocols. 7 .12)° /51.1. Employers C Ora. Lac ' SGYrd. COGe. NYII ... .. ... (WI O.W 1eonc; PrH.ure Pens/ .... (01 Surfer. Wait' ur1000ndmsal... U ENS # All •24-8 AF2924-C AF2924-D rf,F292d-2 AF2924-F AF2924-G AF2924-it •• - Subcontract To: '' -• WM-L Environmental Monitoring Laboratories, Inc. FIELD CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY RECORD SITE/FACILITY a116'Trri SITE NAME cnt 4'•sld"'c I er- Sample Point: 44aM SAMPLE DATE: - art II WIYyI SAMPLE TIME ) 1 31 : 17 1 ! MATRIX CODE: I..Oo eP.1 1 C.00oao.Vown . . (Cl PglqumeM FIKOluy. .. (PI flirL•er/Srs.Me1 Gas Congeal.... l A In11uM1 +IUI I..P Or OCar Apr 1.1 Flown ITI Oun.n d 2.^ 11933 AquePer CONTENT dit,tx taa 1�` 7RyT /�{.7ri{}4f•'{u --C r1Z'•�. 47C 14:.;GaIfKNYI.w1ar a 4 ..Jo.•S.�v'.. Ire4� i.liNS4�li.� a • Y..>T ; -57^rrr ,7 rqy. .rrea+e'� y (C1 r do-e40n P1 ,GI ou .' (ry 9P.cdy { c ( il. �` 1YY .yy a tf S 1 4' i * 11 j •Ir ' r. .�J.. ! © ry' ��y�� —�4. e/diAt <Iy1,.E,S��s P..� .9.14"^`:ii. .tr i• �. '%: r • y• F.+'G >rr^ f+r>•a� ,t•-tef _ ....i .�_ .pp- CHAIN OF CUSTODY CHRONICLE AquaPak' 1, Signature: I have received these materia t. gditi0n from the aboven. X F• flrY c :r.aL nti v Signd T Name• � { t.- Date: /• / 1+ • 5' - 311th.'. Remarks ••STjt• 2400 MR. By: (print) -J./7, Snit, .h. Date: 7 / it In Time a _ n % 2 00 HP Seal s: S/ ? 2_v Intact• S !.. I have received Mese materialsM3ood condition kom the above pelaon. 3. Name' Signature,. _ Date: TTme: Remarl I . 2400 HR. AquaPar/Sub Contr. 0 /Sealed fici .su.2i/ * sya Or ate '2 Its' Time: _Leto d �m•24'. HR. S 4 Signature:�_7 , Seal s: 3 C RS/ ( •Intact: sue, LAB USE ONtY i' � • ,,,a• •. , Y :3' ^� ! �;'a Opened By Site N Lthei W M I Environmental Monitoring Labordtories. Inc. FIELD INFORMATION FORM Bottle'Set: aEl J9 AMA Sample Point: PURGING INFORMATION 1911Q7/Lsj•1213-tinL i 1 IIIpin DM lol� rrY MM 001 SMr DUNE &WSW MS MQER tO. M GONG PU AND SAMPLIINO EQUIPMENT - - Purging Equipment Dedtte s l Sampling Equipment dedicated I Y • LLB t Purging Device Sampling Device Purging Material Sampling Material Tubing -Purging Tubing -Sampling LAI A -Teflon D -Polypropylene 8-Tygon / NyJrJ-P�hyfene C -Rope X Filtering Devices 0.45 u:In1 A -In -line Disposable S -Pressure t. F-SIIiCOn X• n.avn Or1C" pwc.n G -Combination teflon/ X- POIYPmPYiene C-Yatuum %Nell Elevation Oe& to water Fro \o of well casing Groundwaer Elevation Welt Depth . • • . a •lit+ 1st I J71N IY i (STD) t o" 2nd 11711 F4 (STD) I�i7i" 3rdL(STD) • Y 4th I_ 17AV1s1 (STD) FIELD MEASUREMENTS LI. lel / lylg 12 (filmed' lard "Surface Elevation L I FI10lei (ft) 1`117 IS lg 1g r I (tt/msl) Groundwater Elevation Depth to water From land surface I 117-60-Y0 I (ft) stictirp 1st 11t/I71014 at1s:c nil .1 I7 17 IstAl at zs c NM. CO"O Sample Temp. ,smpromo° ..In.o a.rn Mace) I V1617I(•c I I L I I I WI71ski matt= c I I COR'. COCn1. 1 I47I3D1at C • FIELD COMMENTS � Sample Appearance: En -s,---- Odor /145,-r- Color. ,'b �"wi- Turbidity. y G rJ r r'S— Weather Conditions: Wind Speed Inn olrration r' vnanb."o" 2 amookila. �j C�..Yy Specific Comments_ D '4/ 92, Si -2 ae41l = a? F.6 =`2 £/6-$ %4 n..4, r.//_ hi — s y % O.7 i ;- C.. -;. 7 P = 2.-/ 1. Gee r e 1 artily that damp, i7�reettt 7�in accordant; at rjplicebe EPA, State and WMIprotocols A { / •. 1 /� /y7 f��G�f r Lll�� Employer•.7V.1 10•• e.Mir, -• f a • • . IW) 101 • • II) Subcontract To: 1 • WIVII Environmental Monitoring Laboratories. Inc. FIELD CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY RECORD SITE/FACILITY ayditf 1 lI •"SITE NAME csntrikt_jact C'n,m1, P Sample Point: IAA 4 G✓IMW 0'q Sour= Came SAMPLE DATE: - 11O-16 li 1.110' YYI MY 100 SAMPLE TIME. SoY10. Coon. Wu... •.... 0P..bnnQ. PI. Suruc• Wow Imooi nomml ENS it 93S - ,A#2935 -R A CHAIN OF CUSTODY CHRONICLE AF2935-K' 1. AquaPakb Signatur- _ MATRIX CODE: L••el1•b $YPIPm ..'CI Prnr.Plm•M ••Cll.ly. • • (PI 0. C0n0•nac•... ;MI Influent 'uI Air 1A) EPIW'V 0.1 bn n5Ifea ill100t' , Lay O. Oeas1'. ()snail! AqueiSir MEP Aquatelr PID Aqu.P.k" CONTENT -1a m••w. br •>•w.cr:1L Y•: 1Y all'ca':•$'.1l':0. =MG (c) oh OPnu•POn alb....... 1 1V•C•Iy Y .1 t d. IMIa res.-YAM. "PPP; y N N r ZI 1 Date: /go /Pa: Time: 7 • •;D 1400 HR. Seal k: 7/r47 Intact: ! t I have rceived these materials in good condition from the above person. • 2. Name: Signature: Date: / / Time- Remarks: 2400 HR. I have received these materials in good condition from the above person. • 3. Name: Signature: • Date: / ' / Time Remark 2400 HR. 4 AquaPak� ` tSignature • Sealed -By 1U.J./4ate: 1 f Time. eb :OD 1400 HR Seal 4: _ Cni_l Intact: lics5 i7; USE ONLY Opened By: 15'gwe' `' Dale- 1 r.Z('- lbw : --{.+( :..2 Z .3 - . 061 rr r - - i' MI Environmental Monitoring Laboratories. Inc., HELD INFORMATION FORM )loh PURGE 0.CE frY MY 001 Site # __ __ Bottle Set: 11 llI ' I •Z I Sample Point: Li k kI MM0 lc/ -C- \ - PURGING INFORMATION j 41 �� anovps ..aer.o�r CON GIN S NS tcna .tr�ow Paul (Goa PUR29 AND SAMPLING EQUIPMENT Purging Equipment Dedicated I Y I tr 23.s.✓ Semjling Equipment Dedicated I V I S (Sas Purging Device Eamglin tathe ASubmersible Pump B -Peristaltic Pump C -Bladder Pump 0 -Gas Litt Pump E -Venturi Pump F-Oipper/Bdtte Purging Material Sampling Material r ^' A -Teflon . 6Stainleaa Steel C-Potyprocn tsne awc Tubing -Purging Tubing -Sampling ISJ I Li 8 gon A/ /a c-E.Polyethylene Rope X. aPcsaoi � Filtering Devices 0.45 w:I 1 A-InDisposals B-Prsasure Well Elevation Depth to water From top of well casing Groundwater Elevation Well Dept 1st 2nd 3rd 4th (STD) Ili (*MTh) 117gI 51(STo) 11114151 (STD) 2nd, l 151$171 d A -Teflon DiPolypmpylens Fl MEASUREMENTS II/171s17 IA 6.1 (+/r ) Land Surtac. Elevation v -saloon X. _ G -C tilination tefton/ X- PolyPrppylene C -Vacuum Depth to water From land surface Groundwater Elevation Stickup Arnicn1 atZ•C ont/cm at25•C Sample Temp. L _ 3rd 115111 Zktlol atat ac c 4th I Isl8514 aatg c n/quo ow, Ifl ) ww.o or s iww, I l 1 I: j 1. 1 I 11-1(0151(• c) Illill U II1111 U C / AFIELD COMMENTS Sample Appearance: �'�/7Y Odor: lYon� Color. .-20-04-n" Turbidity worst Weather Conditions: Wind ((s V-4 MP.,h' ay.eu.e Pro- S -E nr. wn rt� r Specific Comments: W j/,7R lel6x DO/IL t .)y //arc/ 44.r (*A.., 11.16 (6.143 ) 1,tvsac,c/27 _P /Vie I certify that11samp 7 Do l7r), were in accordance with applicable EPA, State and WMI protocol& 931061 Employer:( 7'C thlres414,C • _ • 1. S 2. Name: Subcontract To: f: W1111f Environmental Monitoring Laboratories. Inc. FIELD CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY RECORD I SITE/FACILITY FOB I'-i" 1 SITE NAME' Citl'XB1, V0411'. .earner Sample Point: LJ N W M W 1r -Ca SAMP E DATE: - 19 17-101'7 i?-1 1 w, SAMPLE TIME: 13 ! 3 I : I �iO 4_ hll.l SCOOT, COOel Woo . . (W) L OCh•le Seer ICI n O.r.nng.......r.'*.i t .... (OI Ow Gnpmuuow) 5wfl5Cip Voter imoco nOmelle ... III All IA) ENS # AF213 t;a A APE936-J AF2936-8 ' *Cy. 1-PC3X04? 1 to I. " ` yy J MATRIX CODE. P.SONV..ene F-Olry(PI IMIUMe Iv, r.111IM1 ITl moser1$ItYIAIM La. or Ocrn . Q r.11 AquaPekm CONTENT - ..........(C1 CAI Ow-n,on q......Gl om-I 4) N iNCH D►.a1 rra Vr • coo." cr ti . d,'1ki ' `�'G✓-3'0.'. ,y�+. aL+r + 'Y• .c r.griCi. PPP e3, 9L _ 171%.x•• 1. AquaPak- O Signature:C/�/�' I have received these materials in gpl dd&ndition from the above'_pdirapn. 4.-0^ Signatt>r'e'• (print), C i IN OF CUSTODY CHRONICLE (Date: 2 /'/ /72 Time' /.)• —27— ;4o° HR. Seal #. COB- Intact C^ Date: / / - Remarks: 2400 HR. I have received these materials in good condition treat the above parson. 3. Name: Signaturr • Date: / AquaPak"'ISub Contr. # 4. r_ Signature: LAB USE OMIY Opened By: Inn"' .a:• Rema 61 .� e ,■,a� - Site a 9. M I Environmental Monitoring Laboratories, Inc. X18 1 P12111' rL�� y8 HELD INFORMATION FORM Sample Point: ki 9 l _ PURGING INFORMATION IIo1 . JILL IiIbbl (resat= 00 (MOW 0041 Mart Kalnlip EQUIPMENT PURGING AND SAMPLING Purging Equipment Dedicated 1Awr Sampling Equipment Dedicated I Y ) CP I lic I Pump DGas Lilt Pump Purging Device A -Submersible a one" smart IL I 8 Pump EVentun Pump Sampling Device -Peristaltic on+r s,tc+n 0 -Bladder Pump F-Dipper/8otte M ti h-- S'. p MTeflon C Polypropykme E Purging Material A,,,Y.) a _• 1 1 Steel D Sampling Material B -Stainless -PVC 30.101.063o.0 n.ecvn 1 aeon 0 -Polypropylene F.snirbr+ X Tubing•Purging 51 ..o OMB r•ttn., I_J B-1ygon E -Polyethylene -Combination tenon/ X. .G Tubing -Sampling C-Rope X- /21;00,s polypropylene rm"moonewtcrn A//1 / Filtering Devices 0.45 $4:1{J I Mndlne Disposable 8-Prassure C -Vacuum ,/ FIELD MEASUREMENTS I4' III j7I Al (wnhsl) land Surface Elevation wmns Well Elevation Depth to water Depth to water I I I 1 Iq jo 191 (h) From land surface (lt) From top of well casing 1 ligi 3 I (4213J (ft/ms9 Groundwater Elevation I I 1 Mims') Groundwater Elevation .--r I 1 I a FlitiP 1001 (ft) Stickup (n) Well Depth I j4lqii-(STD) 1st 1 I$1,11`/ I0j IT; C Semple Temp. I 1/ iT ,IF1(• c) 1st II 1C 11 I�.1(STD) 2nd. L I chi d 10j at r c L I I I I 11J 2nd Z1QI t(STD) OW. Cant "tan 3rd s 3 at z5° C lay,. own) I ( 1 �CL1_1_LJ 3rd .LJ ... .w. W ow. cores. I 15.15t4101 m x.r 1 1 1 1 1 1 L...1 4th 1.1124 (STD) 4th C W rota co -q. Ira enaa+n e. ..w FIELD COMMENTS Odor: 4/ONQ Color ‘cs 1- Turbidity: 44 -.5 Sample Appearance: c/111 iii 4-/ (A: Conditions: spews �! k"� o(n�oaon ��r vr.clpraran �% Woos S- (A:4 - Weather wino f � Sheathe Sheaths Comments. 1) rw = /9.,070, at° ))54C ;SS '/ ) 77_1 !/_F w, v re/,- -- - °t.:;:} i /•J 0) .7:- 4/ 5- fro1 'c.,, 9 21 1i 10 /6J ) : /.Joel %- k . ., fir•-• . I certify that sampli h a with **able EPA, State and WMI protocols. •_ $2 c - -s,o1,A 921061. 7 a /92.- Employer. r area 3. Name' Date' 3 LAB USE ONLY •, 3 Opened By 'slag"' AquaPak-'/Sub 4, Signature:/e Subcontract To: • W M I Environmental Monitoring Laboratories, Inc. FIELD CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY RECORD • SITEJFACILITY#it(igaI`r'x�i SITE NAME:C1ritt7Hta1ci-41)11 tY+[ Sample Point: kSd t'l Iv o 61 Seurat CO* SAMPLE DATE: - 11)l, !7 V/ IEj wrr tao �t SAMPLE TIME: I � L 6 1 : 13 ; n I MATRIX &C& Le Irro HR Sours Cadets WII ..... , ...... • ... (W I l•Knn• SY•"m .. (CI •mnrcil••nr f•elbry( I MY-AV••.w/ O••9HIOmp!Oyyq R•In1.. ;O1 OY co•OMYN. . .(IA) In4IuaI (IA 1.40a DI GA•n 9•n•c• Wau , .oevnorn•nl , , . ;II Alt IA) OAwnt (TI Omfw ENS e - • AquaPak' CONTENT I. • x •r•• Jty. 1. AquaPak' 0 Signature: Mute- PREP • 445, age laak•dl4 1! 10 'L11 Q -NI if••dY a ... `>at EMS tt?:l, '`:;"Y' Date: 7,/'C 'GZ Time. /' UO 2400 HR. Seal # ea 33ole fa intact•y_E5- I have received these materials in go00andition from the above person. 2. Name' ' 'Signature' Date: / / Ym e: Remarks:- -5 2400 MR, \A. -9. I have received these materials in good condition from the above person. Afnature`. • Time- WMI Environmental Monitoring Laboratories, Inc. FIELD INFORMATION FORM, •121.01714 1 rUI1rE DM (VV MM 00) Purging Equipment Dedicated I Y II Site Jr Bottle Set: F lII Sample Point: k W l/ki s-10 16 PURGING INFORMATIOI+� 19.i I 110131 Wth1 11513 START PURGE ELME° MS *MR Ra. 'N CAS.IG AGRML TOLLS( MOMS PU' __G AND SAMPLING EQUIPMENT Sampling Equipment Dedicated I Y I • Purging Device Sampling Device ASubmersible Pump B -Peristaltic Pump C -Bladder Pump D -Gas Lift Pump E -Venturi Pump F-Dipper/Bottle Purging Material I1 A -Teflon Sampling Material i I BStainless Steel C -Polypropylene 0 -PVC 'ASS CITE" 'WIC 1 _ s. Onnn Itnon1 • Tubing -Purging r 1 A -Teflon Tubing -Sampling «_i B-Tygon ' /� C -Rope X- (y�/,nL+ Filtering Devices 0.45 p:l lJJ A -In -line Disposable D -Polypropylene E•Polyethylene B- B -Pressure n.091. ones SPEC FSilicon X• _ C -Combination teflon/ X- , olypropylene C -Vacuum MMRM 004A IYECEVI PUAGING Vr»ET ISPECIPlj svon1w RI•En I.PEC'M Well Elevation Depth to water From top of well casing Groundwater Elevation Well Dept • sl-- t STD 1171%1(Sr0) ry 3rd _21(iL2J (STD) 4th 1 Cl 45-1.Z (STD) pP 1St 2nd Sample Appearance: �1 FIELD MEASUREMENTS ,// [7 I! 17 1"j9 Io I (ftmsl) i Land Surface Elevation I I I I6 jo I fl l (h) Depth to water From land surface (. r n 14k j/ 101 (rvmsl) Groundwater Elevation I I I3 I2 Ji It (n) Stickup 1st I Iy 17 ON J at 2" C Sample Temp. 2nd I 11114 117 Di at 2'" C mot. cawamicrn 3rd I I`W I7 V Di at 25° C ._- coat 4th I lyNhbjat2°C SPEC Lama I... wEner 11/ 13j41(. c) I !111(1 Mew YEm/SW (ft tint) (h) (tt/msl) U I(ILI1 U FIELD COMMENTS // Color. G rn v y Turbidity. x'•'•-44 Weather Conditions: Wind Spited(' S -10 Direction'/be_ b 1 Precipitation� r. Outlook /WS et, Specific Comments•)r�11= 6-crZJC� 1 ,21ls i2.1'7 77) wi ic, a�•.. - 24'6/ <3; -11+/ Odor: 476— ; E, 61 X 0- /6j 4/. ?? �a4 ; i�.s;., �1 3i 2r • I certify that se 2 116 19) - re in accordance with applicable EPA, State and WMI protocols. Employer TC i,-,4' 931061 3. Name: • Subcontract To: T— t' i W �■ 1111 I Environmental Monitoring Laboratories, Inc. FIELD CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY RECORD SITE/FACILITY i gKald'l i' I ,SITE NAME:Cerrt'tti C.j� Veld' afrty Sample Point t- jly V/el Aa 7 SOufC. Code. Wm • .. IWl Cer& ermQ: o'e\sure Ferrer .... (WI SWrec, WSN( ,moo,,nomam ... 111 MATRIX CODE: Le1CIret1 &Men, .. ICI Promeetmrl ek,l,1, . • • 111 faht/ilreem/b Gp cornOenMle.. . 0.0 INloent VI bYe Of Cktiet A✓ (Al emIY.Al 11) Q t.II AquaPek- CONTENT FIELD COMMENTS e'► gtIttri 1 Sr' -' •.,y t r :! .c M� ..?. _ 1YM,�•�JsY .%<" `v ee ail ' . R ,(.I hVF, t��lRa..A : si.n)ly» AI'^' Ott ♦ T7 a 111°';': 1v1 .. ti, J:w4)-it- s. -'�• • v.4%„,,, 4n r� Fi 1.pir AquaPak^ 1. Signature: I have received these materials in 2. Name: Date: CHAIN OF CUSTODY CHRONICLE dition from the abo *': I have received these materials -is -good condition (corn gnat*1 • -. - Stonntur Date: / / - Time: Rem 2400 HR. AquaPak''/Su 4: Signatur LAS USE ONLY Opened By: ("r "n.' Intact W MI Environmental Monitoring Laboratories. Inc. FIELD INFORMATION FORM Site # Ii_l 1 Bottle Set: WI 717131) I Sample Point: ICItvlfrl4lOI PURGING INFORMATION D120720 PURGE OM MO PURQIMQ AND SAMPLING EQUIPMENT Purging Equipment Dedicated i Y I I t 9 Sampling Equipment Dedicated I Y Ionia w f wa scr,we RAGED(Grailrc Purging Device Sampling Device IC, ICI (111 tl lsf ( LLLI2> MAT ANrt MOM ES[D HMS MOM N G LING (1400 M QSJ A -Submersible Pump 8-Penataltic Pump C -Bladder Pump A -Teflon C -Polypropylene 8 -Stainless Steel D -PVC D -Gas Litt Pump E -Venturi Pump F-Dipper/Bottle Purging Material Sampling Material ICI Tubing -Purging Tubing -Sampling L.CJ LC_I A -Teflon 0 -Polypropylene &7ygon / E -Polyethylene �Q C -Rope X- 41 Filtering Devices 045 w.O3) 1 Mln-line Disposable 8 -Pressure Well Elevation Depth to water From top of well casing Groundwater Elevation Well Depth 117221`:1(Sro) I 1 1� I I.(srt) 1st 2nd 3rd I Irill _I (STD) a.z 4th 17 1 1 I (STD) an FIELD MEASUREMENTS 1111714 lyjol11 (ftlmsl) Depth to water I 1116 144q1.. 21 cn) From land surface 1"I 7 15171617 I (tvmsh ,•wC..o On.. i.racrn a..r+wo corm i.fcrn ,wm.m on.. iwfCwr F-Siticon X- N.OMO Clime. I.'[CIW G -Combination teflon/ X - Polypropylene C -Vacuum Land Surface Elevation I I I2(≤ &tsi(t) 1 �`f15R10j atr25°C Met C0M. I 11+15 13 19 at 25 C woe. cone. I 1 151�aj a 250 C. Groundwater Elevation 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Wee. cores. Stickup I I91517-10 at 25° C wec "no Sample Temp. I _ >. _ IMF.* wrerl IANINNO (PIN. I.RG✓n 1I l'{141(. 1 11111 U 1 ILIIII Sample Appearance: 5—; r.a Weather Conditions: wind so..d Siecitic Comments: ,} 1 • � F51ELD COMMENTS f3rowh dar. G/vdHam' r valor I —j-Turbiaity.F431-j /O-r'r "AM of aroo ,,e; ti..1/11 vno+wuuvo on rQ ouot �.- , C- 5'2 ZI..t as-. SS ) /T'1 /J cif w./o- 4•Y,, n• ) g n y4 tor;., 3/Tic? = 9's/yes .'r I certify that sam /7OJ 9) _ 9 in accordance with applicable EPA. State and WMI protocols Employer - C. Uei3Otte' , 931061 • Subcontract To: W M I Environmental Monitoring Laboratories, Inc. FIELD CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY RECORD SITE/FACILITY#14881 1.{! SITE NAME:Clara'a1 14ed ,y^0004 ••- Sample Point; tSoon Gem • F. SAMPLE DATE' — 1412101111 1 Vr r um! 00 SAMPLE TIME: I / I % ! 71 D Source Codes YAM . .. (WI O.r.laingiPgf\Vr. Ronal , • , . 101 Surtaca Wafer IM00LnaM.n1 ... :I) (1.W -AI MATRIX CODE: L•.Cnn. 5Y.NM . . (C) .r.IH.lM.nl Facility... (P1 Rrost/SI900015 OP COnONYN... IMI InlIWnl IUI Lek* or Ocean . Air (Al tOlwnt R) Ou0Y1 ititeicr _.. (11 Gen.r.l0nn 'CI .Or OIMr ......... Ib .01) Sonify ENS # SAMPtt - * IA-31�� .. /' e � • 'ljy..._ 1 -.� •-,j • a _A 1 l )1 1Pwt .4-7-- i tf,•raft t -'• t C.wn'Y.; ..C ,. • .C'I 4414 r•a[ FITEEI FIELD r' 1 •-4- V -N , COMMENTS � --.y rLr IWI"4yw £fLL:"•. : ^'1"....adult '.. .� -...v A62927. -A N "'']? I: -S - . % •♦ el:it-Alger. a... ', :. ry -^- �:'.•-- '.3�.tt f � AF2,927-C .F ✓�-' .t.�a 77. .;rw �-..• :.F29 7 - 0 ti -e.., ir �r rnaro. Y rc- a trbt.; , :rt- .: 4 .... 4 •©,l M Jtl.14 _ AF29L"!-F t"- ,. tt = r 1y.Y1 • Tilt .. L'f..� ail %irt.0 ib'-y (I� �._ � ' w a..t.:�.iA:' ©- •.- -,,- ,p ' AF2927-G +�t._•Y/l� AF2927-H AF2927 - I • • ` "_:.n'+ itrt�. . Tgagr. zi!.1nLe+` zimoni1 s.. --- AF2927-J - 1: .I' r,::.a` .. S'.1�`�,;. r"g-Y':,f S ..a* i^- - ' AF2922."./--K x:. s L b ., ,,•-p"`,.��• � X't+,gp`Lrtttt 2':.hr,101-4 4 B- • e."M' t,c lare� '. ..-. ,.7...:c. .��^�;.1.� e" '#�.�.T.t.as". IJ,�51i�,r:t.1 "�' - �R"' �Fr'rt%r•1�:-: ,,. • . r 7. •: Lt��ili illetteniiiIIIIIIIIMIiiiMMIIIMMIII' n -I T .. 11933 ApuaPak- CONTENT t. AquaPatc" 0 Si Ofiure By: (Pj CHAIN OF CUSTODY CHRONICLE Date: 2 //6 19C Time: ^400 HR. Seal a: ? �,� Intact r5 oq•Jo • 7-q Y J I have received these materials in ydaandit(on from the above pension. a• 2. Name: Date: Signature - toe, - ' • '• r Remarks' X00 111yr I have received these materials in good condition trom the above person. t 3. Name' SQjnature• , Cate: / / Time' Remar 2400 HR, :1 AquaPak"/Su. - •ntr. # Sealed ByriscsiLI/ Fero , Dat�-•7 /4�' /CZ- Time: • - :1/". 4: tPnr"1 • ; } 2)100 HR. Signatur Seal #:71111 Intxt'f� Dirt_._1 o/ 2400 leitallf61. WMI Environmental -Monitoring Laboratories. Inc. FIELD INFORMATION FORM Site N Bettie Set: VIP ki I7 Sample Point: IJ 4 -✓«w0)9 a -,-. Cam PURGING INFORMATION �� ir Iii �r113[ WEI O. Si � �o ay MY CO) Rae W Qar.lTWIT PUM0E (OSW PURGING AND SAMPLING EQUIPMENT Purging Equipment Dedicated I V Sampling Equipment Dedicate:WO V IF� i Purging Device Sampling Device ASubmersible Pump 8 -Peristaltic Pump C -Bladder Pump. D -Gas Utt Pump E -Venturi Pump F-Dipperreottle Purging Material Sampling Material I I A -Teflon B -Stainless Steed C•Polypropylene $w tMW-N Iweir() Tubing -Purging Tubing -Sampling Filtering Devices 0.45 N:I 17 I A -Teflon 0 -Polypropylene 8-Tygon A/ /� - E•Potyethylene C -Rope X- !t'y!0'- 1..�.n A In -line Disposable 8 -Pressure F -Silicon X• _ G -Combination tetonl X- Polypropylene0-Vacuum .wain* aw (3•ECIFVI w.nrm OO4A urtcrn Well Elevation Depth to water From top of welt casing Groundwater Elevation Well Depth I M21 ti pro) 1st 2nd 3rd L hle4 (gm) an• 4th L12141 (so) Pn 1113101 (SIC) Pn FIELD MEASUREMENTS 111 f i3 B ill 81 (fvmsl) Land Surface Elevation L71J � I O depth towater 7 (h) From land suAece 11l )I 13 I S I (ftlmsl) Groundwater Elevation I I 181 j2 I'll (n) Stickup tat 115161EIO at255C 2nd • 11516 I9 ID ai sat C wee. caw 3n* I Is IS 17 [0jat2s°C ROM cOnd, 4th 1116 IR DI at Sr° C eoae tens.. Sample Temp, I_ I II11II I_1 (It) i I I Ii j3 ((• c) I 111111 P--rmi-r FIELD COMMENTS Sample Appearance: rifle Odor: /lfe,e Color: - Turbidity et? `/Y" lit amagM-1 at Weather Conditions: wine sow Q - ^�N bw.eae'n/ qi s. _TF Pnapreatn Y Outlook/tarre t >1 — Specific Comments: yr v - co j/ r I.1 4Q IA. a V 32 G4/// a / u -h �• re/3g6-'; (0.427c-16)- b• 305J.- z)a_.30 w3= /8.99d'L/"1. 1 -r , crJd..Q -n/r a.. ♦- I certify that sam 1/419'MIS ree re in accordanpe with applicable EPA, State and Will protocols [r--� Employer. SeGy 'W-n-t—__.�, .g E911 if ILA u91 Subcontract To: • W M I Environmental Monitoring Laboratories..lnc. FIELD CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY RECORD SITE/FACILITY kai8'[ 4' I SITENAME:Lrntir41 Weld Bounty Sample Point: sun. C... SAMPLE DATE: - 19! LLo!� I/ 1✓ I W I MM' 00 SAMPLE TIME: i (Ill : 12 1101 MATRIX CODE: Source Coosa WW1 ......... ...... IWI D..Wenngt ...... MOO.... (01 5un.p Woe. .moounamem ... ENS $ AF292 5 =iC.;‘ " A'F2 92E -A> "H' .4 2965-F AP2925 -a .A•F292'3' f6 INN" LYCn.b Sworn (CI An Cana.N.1tie Air IA) PM^.Im.nl fifthly 1 P1 Inrmm;w erly.n1 'TI A,neeSn..MMo.r L... Of Ocoan ..R� 5�Mn �y�...(b Outsx. Ours., ;Sir (MI IO.nW sea! • " 31 c..Nrr (C) Over (X) AquaPek^ CONTENT sr r � atc�e � iTI r `,.'. ii Yr4.jiJ rrrp„ 1- t8.�rA/>A�' !+.. /�iL %1• .v ibT'irciry .. .+ `S -t //1.•w e i'R ;'3Prc- ,.,. .:s c'' -•:w iSlta FrOi^J!Yt•-41- CHAIN OF CUSTODY CHRONICLE Aqu.Pak^ Ope t Signature: Date: 7 us -19) -200 HR. Seat a:3/ ?S Y Intact: Time' 'G I have 'received these materials in good Condition from the above person. 2. Name: Date: Time: 2400 HR. Signature' Remarks' I have received these materials in 9000 condition from, the above person. 3. Name: Date: / / Time' 2400 HR. Signature: w Remarks 4. Aqu4PPaar/Sub C&ttr. # Sealed B /4 .J aOats 7 tr l9? Tme' l‘ : r0 hR. Signature:r. Seal a ?x/4'3 Intact: Pr LAB USE ONLY Opened By: (51pn.lu^I Date'' ri f4;• .>,. 1 Q 2er,s r ' p8a AquaPak^/Sub. Contr. I WMI Environmental Monitoring Laboratories, Inc. HELD INFORMATION FORM Site N LQIZI&Li • bottle Set: IA IF 1x19 la 61 Sample Point: IGIWI,YIIwI014I PURGE WTE IW MM 001 . PURGING INFORMATION lthidd STMT ELAPSED MS LW MjlCASINO (WC M RGL (GSM* PURGING AND SAMPLING EQUIPMENT Purging Equipment Dedicated Y ! Sampling Equipment Dedicated !I Y iww Purging Device Sampling Device Purging Material Sampling Material 14) Lai A -Submersible Pump 9-Penstaltic Pump C -Bladder Pump Mellon 8 -Stainless Steel D -Gas Uft Pump E -Venturi Pump F-DipperlBottle I -Piston PMIp: e••• rte. . �c,Wa wwME .Eo @+RMt nlo-rn ODE" ,sitcon • C -Polypropylene D -PVC G'BgYer' M4poo1,1B1`t, - xy urawG one snc rt, E- • - .4.119.00•0 Goan PrtC✓n X- svaluPG arc, pnecw, Tubing -Purging Tubing -Sampling Filtering Devices 0,45 y l al Well Elevation Depth to water Fretioop of wee casing Groundwater Elevation • Well Depth I i aI (STD) I t74 -V- (STD) 1st 2nd 3rd I 171°171 (STD) on 4th V 1 1_ 1 (STD) PP ATef on D.Polypropylene BTygon E -Polyethylene C -Rope X- !v oft incr.) A-tn-line Disposable 8 -Pressure FSNicpn� X: ranG✓rG m -an inrrc✓n G -Combination teflon/ X• _ Polypropylene 0 -Vacuum S Mn,-G p!wn tV°Gt' - FIELD MEASUREMENTS IN I$ ILL j3 I7(ft/msl) f I 1517;9101M Land Surface Elevation Depth to water From land surface . i 14/17 17 awl; I (tt/msl) !, Groundwater Elevation I I I7 P y C 1(ff) Stickup tat [ 1:31*IZ10l alt 5°C We. CMC 2nd 1131110101 at25° C 3rd 4th MMe cons Nmlcm at 25° C arn/cm at25°C Sample Temp, IM>Mma-P ..w .." 11IJ1 u Mn- r -a --m I/ 1111111 tams( eara-.r Sample Appearance: FIELD COMMENTS Lin ow / c.1d 3-o_,�� Turbidi o0,< n— y1/ Odor: t Color ty -- nr ApdcRa°/ Weather Conditions: wine SG..e `1 -re /'vJP!! °„won rl„-_ /4/64.1%1" precipitation'C00 o,0rc c/ -y/ Specific Comments. 5red = SUPS' / 2c/fee' 7 z /S / ].1 c 41 cf <4,f),( i? 3oa i;�) z 2 �2 ., et-;, ) 2-$�.x3 =_g.q• �,/c I certify that sampli 7 /is l yl Mr- edur:: were in accordance with applicable EPA, State andWMI protocols. �y Employer -��C . �� : < n Nvc 931061 Subcontract To: WM I Environmental,Monitoring Laboratories, Inc. FIELD CHAIN-QF-CUSTODY RECORD SITE/FACILITY *I4tin I ' I 1 SITE NAME Sample. Point- w 4 w M ..r ( O SAMPLE DATE: - 1)._1O 17 TY/w100 ;Rnt r, t `' 0111 i nunt y SAMPLE TIME: 11 1.2 ' t (2-1O! MATRIX CODE' (1.0!P' ) Source Comm woo • • IWI LFKPFb Sy•IFM • • ICI Pnvuln5nl F¢IMy• • • IPI Plwr/Sll..m/Bluer •.(NI Sall IS/ O.nmuon Pt ....101 D.WuO,INIMo.w. ANt1 ...•(01 On Cono.nwte. . .( MI mau.nm (LH Law or Oc..n . It& gnaw £Smolt. .. (B1 Omer (al Sunoco wow impouncmen1 ... ..) Mr (Al mart' (•• OufW (0) NOM (N) Spooly e4/ i Aquae PREP 1,3 Lc Mur'Ira C4,4‘2:11.41 Dale Seated uM o0 same 31 LU •y: veerr tMry. Lawn. (C) sw (W Diner (X) ENS r SAMPLE .y•''" ID. "'rtiiR'` r - lfJ7ertrs:M11FC _, r._ • ,-rAN.Nt .i FS W '. FILTER .�: . FE: _' Y — N, FIELD COMMENTS ,'-. COMMENTS r.F"9''3-G d ' 1; 134 +• ✓- AF29•' - I 1 sLi t'. �ll1A Y a -.air-- ? -.. -( ...•fir".. -q r...- .• .,-. •1 - t (1i77(h1 .t1 Ted- en 1 .. . v NI 1 - �. ,d11eDF•. ....r.eee.re.•"� -• " l _� • - Y Ni 1��7+•U"sIC'..i1 ® Y r.-- r Ni •L . . _ •y- Y AquaPar CONTENT CHAIN OF CUSTODY CHRONICLE AquaPak' 0 Y: (print) ••rJ•'-•:'� < ayP`o•+ 1. /` `Q 2�a�0�0� �H�R. Signature , CI % y ' Seal u: -7/4t'&'( Intact:c"'1`/ s I have received these materials in good condition from the above person. 2. Name: Signature' Date: Date:7 "5- 17) Time' // - Timed Remarks* 2400 HR. • I have received these materials in good condition fron,the above person. 3. Name: Signature' Date: / / Time' Remarks: 2400 HR. AquaPar/SyjSe- C tr. p � Sealed By: a Date: 7 /J /4 2 Time' / : : du 4. le.7400 HR Signature'! • Af Seal at: ,F3 Intact: S 7/._ -a/ 9tme: 'aM uf1 Site 0 7L 1 e1 I IS412k I I It.io L1 J I III I I H fJol STAFF PURGE ELAPSED wS WATER f0.. MGSIrG Mrwt WIWE RAGED (?C w rJuml Kane *MOW PURGING AND SAMPLING EQUIPMENT Purging Equipment Dedicated I Y I Sampling Equipment Dedicated I Y .0010 - Ma We. ar- Purging Device Sampling Device A -Submersible Pump B -Peristaltic Pump C -Bladder Pump D -Gas Lilt Pump E -Venturi Pump F-Dipper/Bottle C -Polypropylene E -P lyNhytene X. _ D -PVC X _ Gabor hi-Scoop/Shovel I-PistortPuntp Purging Material Sampling Material lu I LB I Melton B -Stainless Steel Tubing -Purging Tubing -Sampling Filtering Devices 0.45 y:L`I-'.J A -Teflon B-Tygon C -Rope X- {„'/ A --line Disposable B -Pressure D -Polypropylene E -Polyethylene (Seec#V) F -Silicon X _ - G -Combination teflon/ X- - Polypropylene C -Vacuum Swnu.a or Pew ISP[co) Well Elevation Depth to water From top of well casing Groundwater Elevation Well Depth I 16 jR 1.51 (870) L-118_12.1 (sit) on 3rd I ;.4eIel (STO) on 41h 1Ap11R i (STD) 1st 2n0 W I Environmental Monitoring Laboratories, Inc. FIELD INFORMATION FORM Bottle Set: IA1 F1.119 I? [3 1 Sample Point: 14vI *LA IOI PURGING INFORMATION WAGE DATE ere MIA 001 FIELD MEASUREMENTS 1 1181 61,"I(fumsl) I I s! 51 (ft) Land Surface Elevation Depth to water From land surface Groundwater Elevation L 11412131 t i (It) I Stickup 1st 119 1310104 at 2,5r° C spec color. Kmkm 2nd 11P 13 19 Ion at 25° C spec. Cowl 3rd 4th [ W1310lei etQ5°C spec ern/ 11Y 1Y13P161 MMM .o.C cowl. Nth/cm at 25° C Semple Temp. I.M. /Y1..-9 -- -Mono cnietA sPEC1" 1410.40.0 QTM€P,sPtCwI PUPIn° (Mir! Isnc✓.I 9W -!K& ()YMCA IYIc/"1 "AGM) OtPIER ISltc'Ivl I 1 ) ►se l (° C) 11IIll L_._J I I U H LJ Sample Appearance: 0! apakasio Weather Conditions: wine Spied I n - / S , - Pry Direction e - Specific Comments: li 'new Ug • 1 a -��.�1 006,11z/' r _Ts/ r (a. /63 9<c/t4 ; rte. -5) = '273 FIELD COMMENTS //'' Y iy UQ„�y Odor: 4:7.4-su .Color: "S�j'1iC•-rr Turbidity. -- /4r -✓C -s } Pncrptmon WIC* 112`"</// -"` % 62 3y ? wc.l ,rl __ _ is ..c../74,4- 4 ( , . c s r , ' , . - - 2;77x 21: ‘.7-(e fele 1 certify that samp 2PTtz l e were in accordance wit1pplicable EPA. SRO and WMI protocols. Mew Employer: `EC 4.:1,2mbe=- •'-- 93106 ul IR2A 440 Subcontract To: 4- Signature: S CA8 USE ONLY ! ISiQatwrP Opened By: W M I Environmental Monitoring J.aboratories. Inc. L FIELD CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY RECORD SITE/FACILITY 44 I4R I I 1 SITE NAME. - Ph ?Trig t WP(11 n i'rnnry Sample Point: &IL4It" WI Scums Cafe SAMPLE DATE: - 19 2 I old 1 )111 YYI MM100 SAMPLE TIME H 131 t :3104 MATRIX CODE: IA/ ) 12400 w 1 Souris Codas. AquaPake PREP AquaPrit 1n Oats Sealed IRI a I f I '71 /. 5 1 1 ,3z& MM / 00 Seal* Sy vn yF lams (C) SO' oerr (X) •. • Myo ................(WI LncNI• SYSIVn .. (C) Prgrwrn.m Facility... IP, Lvr/SII.•m/OFOOM t .. ON Sell (5) O•..rp,On ' . •01O•WP•rmo Pr..wn .! ".p...• (01 G•. Co,o.n to ... (MI inliual •nl Nil Las or Oc.0.1 5000011•011000 ... I5% OINal r "' Surt.c• Wat•r lmo0unom•nl.•• (I) Au (Al trldel ;t) OW!.(OI tl Nblr q 5 ' l 1 0•t •r ENS Jr SAMPLE I.D.-. . ' AT, I �y• $ :•ti& :... , FILTER - rr . v_N FIELD COMMENTS �r:,L�`, •. IAENT i tiF2782-A 2 ,.e �• ' aFC53 B k w, t n• da. n.F2932-•C w {r : s•t v M 4`1S air .q"`4 .� N; nF2932-ll ; :' O�1SPC1O1•r4 •Ro' r s`y ya ;'•_. -,F2`a3,2 B •L • '> OM$ffDo -;S �I ^•, :i JS N' r,Ey932-F e• - Gs oW ,4 DEG ci,. - _ ► Ni r`` 29 .:-H 01 P NO):?'‘,- • -' l N A[ v i'_- 1 (u2 G 011E?COOL .t ' EC C SV t' Y .9 nc::+.i.• -J 02: G ORE/COOL LEG C Sit _. Y nFt:9J:-.- 1.; 4 G H i-S CDOG 4_ DEG C VO .' r' " r'1 z4J� 4 4 Y �'/ M+' N �J~ f '/'7}:S .il i . CT./ eoe : )ift C Vt -- ,- -. - NI 4 ..1( :•Mr .I . • - •- •-`YU V N AquiPakN CONTENT ASV CHAIN OF CUSTODY CHRONICLE AquaPak- Opened By: (print) Signature: jetc-fg•- ,•/E.r/n/,ul,-i Date: cr' / e7/r i Time' A 9 •Q° Seat 4- eo3rg54 2400 HR. Intact .)/- I have received these materials h good eonditio/( from the above person. 2. Name: Signature: Date: Time: Remarks: 2400 HR. I have received these materials in good condition from the above person. 3. Name: Signature' Date: / / Time- Remarks:... 2400 HR. AduaPak-/Sub Contr. ot Sealed Eiy:"4-1,4f14-,L4N/libut !Date / _/7 / 4/.2- Time: / :416 2490 } 4i. Intact: f- / (Pnno Seal F s+'• .M701 Date: o7- /ft /la Time- U 9 S4 y� - /7 41"1061. TM 0 WMI • Environmental Monitoring Laboratories, Inc. • FIELD INFORMATION FORM Site 0 9131g g1 Bottle Set: I4 2 -Sample Point: IGi lWl /I ? 1 DATE fYY MM 00) Purging Equipment PURGING INFORMATION !IAA) __ll-1J 713 STARt PURGE ELAPSED MS VOTER WAG /CUM. wLUIC PURGES (2100 M Oeet) 1000.10 (Wien? PUR G AND SAMPLING EQUIPMENT Dedicated I V I t Sampling Equipment Dedicated i Y I N .M• Purging Device Sampling Device I Cr I A -Submersible Pump I G I B -Peristaltic Pump C•Bladder Pump D -Gas Litt Pump E -Venturi Pump F-Dipper/Bottle G-8aikc H-Scoww/Shovel l-Plstcn.Pump Purging Material Sampling Material $J A -Teflon C -Polypropylene B -Stainless Steel D -PVC X-• _ MOSC ("RP INK -COIN E-PoirfCytMM X. _ X _ - Tubing -Purging Tubing -Sampling Les,„J Filtering Devices 0.45 M:I S 1 i C.. I ATeflon D•Polypropylene B-Tygon E -Polyethylene C -Rope X- )4.1y Los) (YEGIIv) A -In -line Disposable 8 -Pressure EEAAryJ G OMEN tlnnGII.1 IRAQIS) mrtn YEClnI F -Silicon X _ - G -Combination teflonl X- Pofypropylene C -Vacuum IAMPLP.O OI"Ea ISPECIPv, NIKIMQ OIOEM SPECIFY Y.MILMQ OTHER R/EGiNI Well Elevation Depth to water From top of well casing Groundwater Elevation Well Depth 1 1713131 (STD) nn • 1113151 (STD) w I 1-13161 (STD) En 11113161(STD) on 1st 2nd 3rd 4th FIELD MEASUREMENTS Kt, 1 S�L81 1 (films') I I H 15j2101(tt) 14171 (tutus') I I AG,IZ 111 rnt 1st 1 111ct161°j 2nd 11`419131% NM GOAN 3rd I I $11311 SREO. (*olio. 4111 1°E° COc Land Surface Elevation Depth to water From land surface Groundwater Elevation Stickup sin/cm at 25° C Mmkm at 25" C um/cm at 25° C ymkm at 25° C Sample Temp. I I Izl) jlIrc) I.I u l 111111 l Sample Appearance: -/-24.2/ � aC�pAL44 Weather Conditions: wind so+.o FIELD COMMENTS •• �G/ Color. O# Turbidity „zits. °W nn w.aaruan owook C 1.E IL Aid rJ NY Specific Corr'ments• DTW (,Z , TCflL 1;)€ PTN - (OZ -SI . to— 1/49 '' wATF�Z CoLur"A& 1C,\ �,\ a C�s1k34 ;:+( Z 3 , 4 3 oti) LI# Lo•ito3 `�N/fir) TJ *}JQG ,' I certify that sampling p •_•• urn 7I17I97 _....�� lass, 1 in accordance with applicable EPA, State and WMI pmt ols. Employer: �C O•V6H ■� Subcontract To: :�---- —� k W M-1 Environmental Monitorirc aboratories. inc. FIELD CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY RECORD • Aqua e PREP Mutter V Data Sealed ft 7I / r W / M / OO Sol .31 454 ere fly SITE/FACILITY*4dbi• I• ISITE NAME- CCYTC et 1401,3 Sample Point !W &I 14 I SAMPLE DATE: - l9 It'll 1 /I 1 Y. ,.IM/dp SAMPLE TIME: I ) 1(41 13Id1 (2400 MP 1 SourCe Codes�,� vim, ................ (WI L..en.i. Sestet. ..ICI P,.nnm. ,! c.Clurv124444/211444,1510011.124444/211444,1510011.... l P1 124444/21124444/211444,1510011./5'o• .: (A.• 21.15 .4.YCU. . . ( eencr.aon PT .... IGI O.ra.nnt) P'..ul. Rtlul i01 On ConO..IN..... ;iv) Influent IV) L.11. Or Ocean 1t1 Sold.% Saint ... I '•P.RM IVI Sven Wile Imoaunameet . .. (I) Mr 'Al ERlu.nl 11) OYeMI 403 Moss .. . . .1 Stacey MATRIX CODE: County W ( wow QII Soo (C) . (X) ENS $ SAMPLE I.O. f ..i OP .. aO1TLE3' -1T t'NESENYATLYE ,' ..-. TYPO MIAL'f�iilL1E RLrER V - N FIELD COMMENTS +t - - CM.L' �A„cOMuENTS ..F' 441 A 94 •- CL /COOL, 4 DEC C • - VO ;S r. " Q u� ..F?.)31 • E pi ,.. x0* - : SS A'ArrY A C 3.7 1 -L 01 1 SQ¢4CoOt. i t}EG'- C Ch N. •. hr +7I -I+ 101 P ONE/COOL':4 DEC C CS Ai- .,...:I.:11 -.:: 1 G 011E/COOLr'4 DEG C. CR' .'.. � N' i< ".. aF 4`s1 -F 1 • 086/COOL 4 DEC C.- Cli.-:ap•� 1 ./..... f nr34J1 C 1 P. NO3. 1M • • -- .451--1 ,,� .,Ff'4.J 1 - E C L 1103 YN -,c17t Cf!v n F:: ).i. -I 92 G • OII$E/COOL' 4 DEC C 'ST- ^•;'-••..Y AF',:.'a3i-J pa - 011E/COOL 4 MG C SY.I..4-v; r• ,-.1-';:143.1-K ii4 R-S/C09L 4 DEG C 110:— ' NI Y Ni L4,44.45.3 fJ.'71S S.E"L931.:L -. . 01 - et COOL-4_DEG-C'..;-. Vo"'rz. -1144 _ w >.. ear.. ../..1.4,.01 AquaPsk" CONTENT CHAIN OF CUSTODY CHRONICLE AquaPak" Opened By: (print) Signature: ✓CN /4 / AM,' Date: _97 1O1 / /1 Time: Cr :CO 2400 R. Seal 0: 40 i/ 653 Intact: r'C I have received these materials in goad g1►rSdition from the above person. 2. Name: Signature' Date: / / Time: Remarks' 2400 HR. I have received these materials in good condition from the above person. 3. Name: Signature: Date: / / Time' Remarks_ /- AquaPak"/Sub Contr. # Sealed By 44,,.E ter" r+4.C Date: '7 / ci / 4v Time: j 'de.' 4. (Pncr, 400 HR. LAB USE ONLY Opened By: is"'"""" Site a 44 (8I WMI Environmental Monitoring laboratories, 'Inc. FIELD INFORMATION FORM Bottle Set: P{2I93 1 Sam,ole Point: L 1GI�I awl I `'1 O i PUPGE DATE NY MM 001 A Purging Equipment 0 5 PURGING INFORMATION • i•Iii l�l11(2I A45 STMT PURGE ELAPSED MRS *SIE,I RA_ IM GANG ACTUAL POLY! FUMED (MA 1* OM) (GMnnI (C/4M) PUR G AND SAMPLING EQUIPMENT Dedicated I V I Sampling Equipment Dedicated I Y I f N7 Purging Device Sampling Device Ii A -Submersible Pump B -Peristaltic Pump C -Bladder Pump D -Gas Lift Pump E -Venturi Pump F-Dipper/Bottle G -Batley _ HSco fShoW( I -Piston Pump- Purging Material Sampling Material Tubing -Purging Tubing -Sampling Filtering Devices 0.45 A -Teflon C -Polypropylene 8 -Stainless Steel D -PVC x- X• nPae10 oncA ISPEGI", E-Poyathylene. . . X- X- ATeflon 0 -Polypropylene B-Tygon !-Polyethylene C -Rope X- /IiyLel4 A -In -line Disposable 8 -Pressure A.YRM On•Ee IS ECIn, PPMEIVc O,MEn IYIC✓P'1 S.YPLUMO OTMCA'S C*VVI p -Silicon X- PVPOIMO O..IP iSPECIPv, G -Combination teflon/ X• Polypropylene C•Vacuum IAMPUMGO/MEn lsrldev, Well Elevation Depth to water From top of well casing Groundwater Elevation Well Depth 1st 2nd 3rd 4th I IS Slb1 (STD) pn I Ibj$I� (STD) on 116jgjSI(s o) on I (sTD) on ,/ FIELD MEASUREMENTS [41 71 0 / 1 9131 (ft/msl) l 113I°j31471(III 141'11311 j6I31(tt/msl) I 1 171015131 (It) 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Land Surface Elevation Depth to water From land surface Groundwater Elevation Stickup l6l`!181oj att25°C 0C. COMD. L 161°Pj a me .feC. COnb. µ 161`181°j atm 2/cm50 C sped. COMO. 1 417'1°j ❑m/cm at250C sow cone Sample Temp. 5151rC) I � FIELD COMMENTS , I Sample Appearance: fLEA$J Odor: I'+oraE Color 1•10 ME- Turbidity )\1ot.1E (It appraise)l £ weather Conditions: wine speed OMecuon �~— Pncipiuti0n Y MU Oook C....LS.441N./ �^ / Specific Comments: Deno 30.3 To-rlrsr .12 ,er�d = 711 . 5,3 ''�' Vig, 2 2 :7' a.17ga- 4Z -v& ve, z3(o. 163) 7- 4.-Z Croz- ,A gets -,;(4- 4.5Z C3) = /9. 73,0t7,, $60- G4/aa c Z 4+4 CV Day I certify that sampling procedu>es re in accordance with applicable EPA, State and WMI protocols. 7 //J /92 , e /G7p_ Employer: SEC D„oo goC IDYI (sew L WMI Subcontract To: Environmental Monitoring Laboratories. Inc. FIELD CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY RECORD SITE/FACILITY 414d8( I ( SITE NAME coat -Val W 1.0 County Sample Point: LA G 0J I44 vi f 13 SAMPLE DATE: — 1g12.1 6 v.I Mr,W SAMPLE TIME I J 1S I :121O1 124O3 "el Y' MATRIX CODE: V'/ Webr Ltechele CC) Sor (s) onwr !x) Source Coots. Weu . . .............. IWI ln•cnets Snum .. ICI Prelmlmenl Fscnuv ... (PI e•VPISrr•.mISfooW .. (R) SOS - (S) Oener.aon A .... IW Da".Iaing Pre..Vre Rebel .....01 On Cone.nwl....'MI Influent (UI La•. a Ocean (U - SO(P. {d1111.. . (el Omer KI Sunoco. W.(.1 imOOGnOmanl ... 01 .0 Al EIIlu•n IT) ONIPn (0) Nada IN) SOK It ENS k SAMPLE I.D. - .• _AS! , PRESERVATIVE TYPE ANAL.��' FILTER FIELD ,E4RAP s .• ..r Y —H' COMMENTS Y„ V'�Y0..4,:;•�, E.M.L. COMMENTS ,_929-A C /Coot 4 rEG C AF 2 929-0 • S 4 t4" '01. +DEC• C •° g-I-zrr 9r--, 1-;:9 ).19 D • ii- . . .: ONE COOL 4 DEG C Ca .._. ;e N AF. f:: -i E • 1 LINE .COOL 4 `DEG C _ ` CStM ` : N, T— hill 92b -F OCE COOL, 4 LWG C -CB r• G►r, :.F29d ;-H NO3 .. •' ill --,; : �•�trti. AF2929-E •2. c• ONE COOL 4 DEG C 79.3./''...' .'' AF-Z9ZY-J ,r2.7 .�. e : eOD 4.'r v.. C. - . .. .. . `' i ..F29Z9-K R �S COOL 4 DEG CVO " ••N A 929-L ..?,. . -.... C_ CG0:1;.'-4-s,rEG C . ;..Y.0..:.. ''V NI trr. - N ._ NI AquePak- CONTENT CHAIN OF CUSTODY CHRONICLE AquaPak- Op Signature b$y: (print) / r Date: 7116 /q Time- :* 2400 HR. Seal u: 00 13 o 4Lit_ Intact: 'r. — I have received these materials in good condition from the above person. 2. Name: Signature' Date:.. _ Time: Remarks: 2400 HR. I have received these materials in good condition from the above person. 3. Name: Signature* Date: / / Time: Remarks: • 2400 HR. AquaPak'/Sub C r. a Sealed By: & cfi /Z...7ara. Date. 7 / l6 /97 Time: /9 t -`d 4. %% (Prue) ZOO HP. Signature' Ci••C� Seal u:72/S ? Intact' Z s w LAB USE ONLY Opened By: 'S.gn,I„r,) Date' ,? / .fr7 / glliime: t ZC �rvn•�t�, uaPak-/Sub. Contr # WMI Environmental Monitoring Laboratories, Inc. FIELD INFORMATION FORM , Site # 115 8 Bottle Set: [A [,4IFI2 I .19 I Sample Point: 3 Iw 2..1. Cs I PURGING INFORMATION b J IoI7l� 6 I, # LL I I I Snort PU$OL Euw5Ep HAS wau WI- w MUSING (20001MCMM( (G..1N PURGING AND SAMPLING EQUIPMENT Purging Equipment Dedicated ! Y 1 N Sampling Equipment two- .VMGE EMIT (YY MM W( LlliziA A TA.'CO ME puinco Dedicated i Y Purging Device Sampling Device Purging Material Sampling Material I -J A -Submersible Pump B•Peristaltic Pump C -Bladder Pump 18 I A -Tenon I 8 I B -stainless steel D -Gas Lift Pump E Venturi Pump F-Dipper/Bottle C -Polypropylene D-Pvc G -Beyer .- X- H-S000g t>ai1.> ' I -Piston Pump- E -Polyethylene.. it. _ Tubing -Purging Tubing -Sampling Filtering Devices 045 w:IB I Le.ei Lc -al 8-Tygon C -Rope X• 174-a«+ A -In -line Disposable ATeflon 0 -Polypropylene E -Polyethylene &Pressure .waa onE. irtcl.v. 4.MHJb onre. ,rfcw, NAO .] 0"En x SAM.{.I.G Or.E, IS.EC.Y1 F -Silicon X- •vwwn m.en IrEc.� G -Combination teflon/ X - Polypropylene C -Vacuum h+.M 0104. I rnCI.Y, Well Elevation Depth to water From top of well casing Groundwater Elevation Well Depth I 111101 (STD) 117J Isl (srD) on 171/I61(srD) Dr, 117 J El I (sr0) o. 1st 2nd 3rd 4th FIELD MEASUREMENTS 1y1,17 114./ IQJ (ftimsl) I I I I 'sleight) Iy I7I 6 17) to' (ft,n &) I I I6 II 1g I3 I (ff) Land Surface Elevation Depth to water From land surface Groundwater Elevation Stickup µm/cm 1st I J316IsDI at 25° C 2nd 3rd 4th 113Io101J1:7125°C cOec. cone l Iv)9I3Io1 att25°C ewe. cone. 10EC cone pm/cm at 25° C Sample Temp. L11_21 c° c) I IIILII loner >M.wl it (ft/msi) IIIIII I FIELD COMMENTS //++ Sample Appearance: (//"C. -_ Odor No Li& Color: 5z-,bier ,2.1.* Turbidity: $G/`N7 n .oaho.nM( Weather Conditions: Wind spew e BZ M ouea.on pgOt;/pitstwn ooutlookO!/E4 £#it '7 Specific Comments. prix s Saler ' r' s ‘./n//fl' $6•if v�lc/.P1�,[ tic ✓.r.) .t Der' 56, d/ a , /631 tp ZL try &rote , > 9.24 x3 7 347,-. 73 /4444 IIc� can�iiffyy that sarjtptipg proccI D4101 e in accordance with applicable EPA, State and WMI protocols. Employer Set amef/le 9106 S Y • Subcontratt ' ar . WM I Environmental Monitoring Laboratories, Inc. FIELD CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY RECORD SITE/FACILITY #{.04a I I I SITE NAME'Cais a t Ha I A r•nssnty Sample Point: ICiL44Ml'l) I %1 Mena 0..t SAMPLE DATE: - I� I2101L12 1 k I n/MMI00 SAMPLE TIME. I III ! : 10 10 1 Iwo rM, SOUrC. COOST. MATRIX CODE: AquaPar wry � qo Data Sealed till 1 If 171 /Lc) OD We, M') LMc11W+ (C) sw...(m. our (X) Well , , , , , ..... :WI L.6n.(. SYr.m .. tC) nrrnN(m.m .ccnuv... O1 IIw.r7num!sroor .. 111) !Id CS) O.r-r.n0n a .... IGI O.w.nrmg,nr.ssure Ar,.r ....f0) G.. Congenital.. . . (MI Inna.m (uI L... Or Ocean N Bottom S.01 .. . It om. '.) Sae.n Wp.r imaoanam.n( ... (II Air I.) E'N.m Ill Oannl 101. Nose NI peso~ usPak" CONTENT SAM3f.E ., I,D., sue" 5>r :,+�,1+.yr•� *r rl6.5Sk .il, '`u' .,:'..r o { aY—.. ¢i' � FILTER I FIELD Y —N, COMMENTS ..WEM .dti.,.,,. ... Y`,�:�' -._ 04', - ) :,,. .. e' v;'.,,,,. ate;...+ J: 3.: err ?•_� .. /'_:.. jrs tA�' ►14► •15, h 1. tt d! !• J r r; �C► r, F?. 'I 3 E a 1 It' 1- A F213.3 - F OCS P . OWE C.01:- • • F!.•ii lel-aa; 01 P' NO . II Y AF2y.5n -ri 07 P ' 0 �r .,F :' ; :tit • I 02 n .V V Y :yc• ��. • J ti'.11L.: �L.1��rV .�Far•wa+lgO��r�r i� Y NI \® NI - I N - CHAIN OF CUSTODY CHRONICLE 1. AquaPak" 0r • a -. =y: (print) Signature•,, I have received thestmaterials in good condition from the above person. I40i/ 7In172S 47 . Date: 7/a/ /f? Time' /' •nr' Seal x• 7/11.1 Intac 2. Name: Date: Signature Time: Remarks - 2400 HR. I have received these materials in good condition from the above person. 3, Name: Signature: Date: Y / Time' Remarks: 2400 Hg., AquaPak'IS' 4. / Signaturdi- _ Sealed B ( Date: i iii 192 Time: /Y :2 -Pe 400 •P Seal or 21156 Intact e LAB USE ONLY // / 2 5, �ZT Pr 7g O ened By: '5'an'IY"I Date: ( Ime: P 92. 4, k WMI Environmental Monitoring Laboratories. Inc. - HELD INFORMATION FORM Site M B Bottle Set: l4if la 19 L3 18 Sample Point: L'Jcosy �+) PURGING INFORMATION IzIo171�111 I JJ 11 III kl III217ki wnGL DATE WITT RAGE SA°YD PDIA eX. M [AUG AGTULL AUK RINGED ref FAY DDI i2'W w OW, IDOOei MAW* PUR AND SAMPLING EQUIPMENT Purging Equipment Dedicated I v I Sampling Equipment Dedicated I Y ISim* MIMS Purging Device Sampling Device Purging Material Sampling Material LJ ASubmersible Pump 0 -Gas Lift Pump G BeAk ICI 8 -Peristaltic Pump E•Ventun Pump H-S0D0p1.7t1oYef.; C -Bladder Pump F-Dipper/Bottle I Piebq Sump': C -Polypropylene tiyNt;>• 0 -PVC ' : 7F _ A -Teflon 8 -Stainless Steel Tubing -Purging LC_1 ATetlgn O -Polypropylene Tubing -Sampling L_! B-lygon C -Rope X- /�Y1 Polyethylene r� S FSilicon GCombination tfon/ X- e.ac.� Polypropylene Filtering Devices 0.45 M:I ) I A•In-line Disposable B -Pressure C -Vacuum X- lJ9a0 011411 10Ih:W i seartasa arras 1Y[cl.1 Well Elevation Depth to water From top of well casing Groundwater Elevation Well Depth 1st ___s rt x___ ??max D) '/ 2nd -I t7 ? I (STD) rM 3rd I I7?‘ I (STD) 4th 117ja7 I (STD) Oh .° FIELD MEASUREMENTS IL/ 17I6131? to I (tumsp Land Surface Elevation Depth to water I I I I713 I ST t) From land surface I VI j314 1 (turns!) Groundwater Elevation 1114 I2 if 1 I (ff) Stickup 1st I WI, IY Io. at 25N' C • 2nd I IYII1104 at25'C .0.0. Cdb. orkm 3ro 111131014 at 2s° C .D.C. Conroe Jam/cm 4th I WIYI0 jat25oC .OK toad Sample Temp. (ftlmsl) (ft) (h/rnsl) (f ) FIELD COMMENTS Sample Appearance: S/ /i Odor Color. Turbdty r� `/ 1 or Weather Conditions: wine Speed Direction Pnrapma/ 12 00000 4- " S Specinc Comments' 7L� )' 7. 37 /e, 7:1.e �cfrc { = �Z r/� --r)sr.,/ 'n .2 .i/-.. (0./63 ' )z 'P-f'�? ;or ;-c --� -77 're.9s = .�0 9 yM risr, e • y 1 certify that samp rocedures re in accordance with applicable EPA, State and WMI protocols. .P1 /9; '/ -� -� ♦(. Ernployen y ~ 1--hr`o 10..1 is°.e..1. Y •t • Subcontract To; • • - W MI Environmental Monitoring Laboratories. Inc. FIELD CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY RECORD SITE/FACILITY 4148 I I SITE NAME‘'enrr≤1 Sample Point: s VI SAMPLE DATE - 19'a lOI7 12 I II Py INM r Qe We)e Countsn SAMPLE TIME I III: fO1 S MATRIX CODE: Source Ccces'. Wool........... . (WI L..cn.,. SY.Iern.. ICI Prelr.wm.s, FcsIny... (PI b.../SlreeMOpaI.. .IN Soo (SI Ge.Yw.uan Pt ,:: 0) G.WPennQIPtpSp ce flit,.( .....'01 GM Conn..,.. . .(M) In11V.n1 IV{ Lae Or Ocean IL) BOWOM S.Olmelll . . . 101 Cm. i%1 Sufl.c. Waist lmaounam,n, , , (I) A' (Al EMwni (11 OYeMI 101 NSY IN) Soec ly WOHWI AgumPair : `"a8 1 oaasaes I I t lei /7L/tii VY / MM 1 00 Soil M g I ICS? sr• FIB / ea,,M.WS.6 u),._ c4ur.9 tiv:e etwir.vj44 wider o' l.aNleti (C) sw ( 1. OtIS (x) ENS AquaPak` CONTENT SAMPLE I.D. - f CM ';-. &mat• -"NE •.TAE9P.RYATIVE . qqE .. ". ': ' "e' •4• ►, AKLLYTE*A!Q'.. ,,. nLTER I FIELD EMU v — N. COMMENT°, - GOA+i11EM$ rd- iyJ'd-... e4 G CL/CeOL 4 lEG C - VO -_ 1 r.F;a::, e e1 .. P .NO3 S8` Yom. nF29J'+•-% L 304/COOL DEG C CR M~NE) nTG935` D e 1 P e / e e F. ('' v ..f•.:9ss-E e1 Gam- ONE COOL 4 DEG C CR Y N h tL'1,:4-i• e= GONE/COOL 4 DSG C CR ...Vim; .+F::yJ9-k. 01 a NO3 IN ;y N nFc1 --, d 31 P NO3 £N ar Y.F�S.;y L 02 G , ONE COOL 4 DEG C SV S' ^F:-.14.) J +02 G ONE COOL 4 DEG C SY Y` F'2'139 -t: 04 C H 4-5/COOL 4 DEe C VO Nt - it .. c�sall r wrt' Y _.. ... Y Ni. „♦ -. • .. - . . Y 41 CHAIN OF CUSTODY CHRONICLE T. AquaPakc O. Signature: By: (pnr�F) � d!✓l i�r/2--- Date: -71)) /92 Time- // t n Seal s: F/A2£'' 2500 HR. Intact- "@S I have received these -materials in good condition from the above person. 2. Name: Signature: Date: Time: Remarks - 2400 HR. I have received these materials in good condition from the above person. 3. Name: Signature: / / Date: Time' Remarks:.x. AQuaPakN/SU c Seated By{� .t Lo a Date: 2 t2, /7..l Time. :/- a. 3 nature2a00 HR. Si 9 Seas M: ��/�� Intact: s 3 LAB USE ONLY Opened Sy: ""ne1u^I Site # L 112„1__J MIME DATE m 114 00) W M I Environmental Monitoring Laboratories, Inc. FIELD INFORMATION FORM// WAGING INFORMATION atsls} START PurOE (2400M00) PUR Purging Equipment Dedicated I Y I le.. Bottle Set: V VIZ O 151 Sample Point: U I' wan en SI M VOL w CASC (0 AND SAMPLING EQUIPMENT Sampling Equipment Dedicated Y Purging Device Sampling Device 1 t A -Submersible Pump B -Peristaltic Pump C -Bladder Pump 0 -Gas Lift Pump Gault.....:,'_ ,,- X. - E Venturi Pump Xr F-Dipper/Bottle I-Piegnftm*-:.,;w Purging Material Sampling Material A -Teflon B -Stainless Steel C -Polypropylene D -PVC E-PolyettMerett -X, _ Tubing -Purging Tubing -Sampling 2 Filtering Devices 0.45 0:I 5 I IC u A -Teflon 0 -Polypropylene B-Tygon r E -Polyethylene C•lope X- /iirfn ISPepEvl A -In -line Disposable 8 -Pressure Seas Camp .ciw. NXWIE ruAGEO IGneq NOP AMINO we iSPtcrn w.tino DIHEl1 (SPEaPY} nroPPD CAW, u ECI.P.i F -Silicon �:• _ G -Combination teflon/ X _ - Polypropylene CVacuum c elyPD R.te.ANrn ruPaP4 orPEP'SPECIPYI siYaume QTMHI snnCrn Well Elevation Deotn to water From top of well casing Groundwater Elevation Well Depth ,�� -� 1st L .* l ($TD) 2nd . 11e16 Iq I (STD) pi, 3x1 l (STD) on ath I Ib17101(STD)- tP P 17161/ 1tI2.1 (ftmsi) I l 315VIll i (ft) 141 713 IR I (h/msl) 11131014131(ff) Stickup Y 7 0 4m/cm CtYfst 1 I4'iG101 at 25° C S5 O 0 am/cm + 1.4161#ill at 25° C FIELD MEASUREMENTS 2nd sac. taw. 3rd I 1s1sl/ 101 at 25° C sac. cab. ath I 1-' 1SIa-1o1 at 251" C faaa. Conti Land Surface Elevation Depth to water From land surface Groundwater Elevation Sample Temp. l 1118181(eC) 1 111111 (It) U 111111 c__I w tom+ {/ FIELD COMMENTS /1� Sample Appearances t l y Oda: ��'ve Color: 1'Ve�rn Turbidity. pl taq Weather Conditions: •wind spv. /Q'- /0 Pr/ Direction '0-'1 .ttQ Praaputwn rQ Ou00,* Specific Com entstriV = pp�� `4// 7,::// n }c//t + 30. 23 C. '4 %/ el nu c% 'c% _ 4r 3�f, )(O/6: 1r•) l0V 9eO &' c) 401 K) 3/,r e i r/n I certify that sampling 711,15 ? , Ia— ItreM. es ,. re in accordance with applicable EPA. State and anWMI protocols, a - Emplgrer: SFC 9-1.061. Subcontract To: WMI Environmental Monitoring Laboratories, Inc. FIELD CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY RECORD • _ SITE/FACILITY uP1d8l I I SITE NAME 'control 0ryld Count? Sample Point: UJ F SAMPLE DATE: - L912 101 Z1/ i611. YV/M4/00 SAMPLE TIME: IL 131 : I /1ST! MATRIX CODE: Source Coon well . .............. Iw) D.wverin0. Prenure Aehel ..... D l Surlece WI/I, Imoovn.men1 ... 111 i Aqua'.«- mei Jon muss-. D aud SLQ1 2ni 71 1 tS YY / MM / DD I 12.00 IM l 50�....._...1...a.. ;YI Lncn file Sync,. .. /C1 Prel-elmenl r.cn.ly ... i•l Pnel/Slrpm/E.eoV ..MI ♦'..-.- n - 4S) Geaon Pr .... ICI ',thug" COAMMISII. ../Ml 1ntuIUl Lao Or Otis.)IL) - ...... (S) OM*..... !R Ao. IA) Emuenl IT) Ouneu Lek_ 840.• /{P:•:.- . IN1 Spec ry M T-' AqusPak" CONTENT SAMPLE IOF ernes1.o. enes FIRE TtVE t ":Torn • .;,..:„..,;;;L:;:". - .� ralar•.., 1 FILTER FIELD Y -N COMMENTS E.M.L COMMENTS AF..1'14.4-A r4 G - Ct.ICOOL. '•1_ AEG C - 7O--\!1-'); AF2'442-e •1 `. .r' X103. -. :.i>'r:._-C .1, ..•-• a.: 2304 COOL . DEG C c '��. nP2 »:: -1) • 1 C ONE COOL 4 DEC •C --CR - _:. Y - #,F2.44...- E s 1 P ONE COOL 4 DEG C '' fl - Y�y ,F2Y42-F •1 P"- Wig COOL•4 DEC C CU - ` .,"F2'l4_'-u •I P ' NO3 IX , 294.=.-0 01 P ,.. NO3 ' I .. vt nFi9A42•1 •2 G"'. Ogg COOL 4 DEG C Su. ©4•i nF2`.r4,:-J e2._ ' C., , •' Y r. nI- .. A4...-i. •# .'. C.: 4- /COOL 4 Dt.'G %.N 40. 94.=.-L . (+�.. -: .0--..:.CWTi .:. ,y;. IEC C :.-._:y. .... .. Y Ni • y11=4 �irA11GAI �T !r- Y N • r (r{� • • •s 1.l;,' - • . - - •� - Y 41 • �:-T Y N ...:JA : CHAIN OF CUSTODY CHRONICLE AquaPak- 0 Signature: QC B (pri r -c, Date: 7 I /l ' ), Time Seal it J / reT3 Intact' n400 I have received these materials in gpa4.Condition from the above person. • 2. Name: Signature:_ Date: Time: Remarks: 2400 HR. I have received these materials in good condition from the above person. 3. Name: Signature' sue Date: / Time' Remarks: 2400 HR. AquaPak^/Sub 4. C/ Signature.�< Sealed By: gate: ll6 19Z Time- / Pont HR. Seal a: -3 `e? Intactg.00 2i 2 LAB USE ONLY Opened 854 ` "r•l aPar/Sub. Contr I CT Date' • D / f Inta= • 2400143196'C Tem..C Seal - 3iteM Niel x { 1 �■ ��/M t)n V� � Environmental Monitoring Laboratories. Inc. SettleSet: f 9 2 Sample Point: [LJ 2- F Ia ek D HELD INFORMATION FORM PURGING INFORMATION ► L I 1 I �1 t i.1 --t-- . rwgrn NAGE D•tE SU$T N,Me! S. IO n#S wOTA 10, in GLPG ILT A% WuME (Y ken Do) (24(0w ) (Goan ,G•1•w PURGING AND SAMPLING EQUIPMENT Equipment Dedicated I Y , !till Purging Equipment Dedicated..Sampling k.....1. r...... 4 A Pump D -Gas Lift Pump G-8edr, � ]F" ' Purging Device -Submersible �' ,K. - - ,a .- ninouoo�n i•nc+n 8 Pump E-Ventun Pump 'H.• s, ')Nano4 Sampling Device -ice -Peristaltic 3�� Orman nn C. -Bladder -Bladder Pump F-Dipper/Bottle I-PlS � n :.. r•Kam. -1J A C -polypropylene E 4. Purging Material -Teton - &Stainless Steel. D -PVC Sampling Material s..Mn oMu' eer" Tubing -i---4- .Teflon D -Polypropylene - F -Silicon X- -Purging eu Oino Owen is.ecl-n Tubing ICI. 8-Tygon E -Polyethylene 6 -Combination teflon/ X- -Sampling C -Rope X- Polypropylene I arwe.,sPtC ,Eeerin Filtering Devices 0.45 IA-1-1—Mn-line Disposable &Pressure CVacuum FIELD MEASUREMENTS I I I ill I (ftlmsl) Land Surface Elevation Mill I mtfq Well Elevation Depth to water (tt) Depth totter From land'Wrtace (ft) From top of well casing (ft/msl) Groundwater Elevation (ft/msl) Groundwater Elevation (tt) Stickup at)) Well Depth 113170.9 I U 171:21 �f j21 C) 1st I. Ite lz4 (STD) 1st att 25' C Sample Temp. (° pn 1 I?1°I51(sro) w•0. cow. 2nd 113 I7is`191 at 25°D I 11 1 III I 2nd on I 1t0Ibl wae. col . tons •.....” 3rd I 1 L7IMMD at 2S°C I J w wr Ii 3rd (sro) DI, I 1110111 loot. CONE l 4th I I317IZ I DI at 26' C mew wr Iwo [Hill 4th (STD) �.. se C0MU. iWs en. 1 .e W FIELD COMMENTS C-LE/43 Odor Color: t(.IC 4/6 Turbidity. NO N6 Sample Appearance: _NDAlf pr 00pcaau r--Q��sT CALM PAC,pnoonr® amok � Weather Conditions: wieasgeed _t» Specific Comments: u,D...— ft %;-• Q U 144 t 4, cy>l h). p./1_, :7 ,F-/s./r/r t is (—'e) 14„.„ .s.. • I certify that sam gg u accordance with applicable EPA. State and WMI protocols. 7 11419z `/ r e. Employer: 5[C deS4 92 q her 1961 loon r I Subcontract/to: W M I Environmental Monitoring Laboratories. Inc FIELD CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY RECORD S _ SITE/FACILITYkµ89f i.1 SITENAME'.•faril Ile12 P.a.+nryr" Sample Point: u b l SAMPLE DATE: - l4 (7-4O17!( I VII I DM / CO SAMPLE TIME: ioT I: I/ 1O 1 a•oo rr, Source COO..-. wall . . .. • . • • . • . ..... (W L..en.r. Snum ..101 A.I,..1Mnl neon... (PI A,wnsvwvs Ovia.nn9,.r...Ur* n."N..•.fO all Conp.n.n... • I M1 ineu.n IVI l... or Oc..n .. Svrr¢. W.IP hnoovoo n.M ... 11 Air (A) EMi.M (1) Du11W MATRIX CODE: ENS # AF294.1-D' Ac2941-B AF2941-P AF2941-G AF29411-H AF2941-1 A Aqu.Pak" CONTENT Aqu r Pty Aqualtilr Bats seeded 7 tat& ., r - 1 a� 7,,m�•Y6 •• JQ. w.,,,"ad, r: rq t�i. _ rr 1 i .'ii �i4L"dJ.f�..l � 4:a;1•L J1 LL � ,ri.i iaFA ror':`r�^i-r ��.. 1 4i1'r;.�tei 7F.is .1 K .'er r3aitfa, . 1 ➢n p _ o ' N (C) 00 A..... (GI XI CHAIN OF CUSTODY CHRONICLE Time' 07 ;CO 2400 HR, Intact: Y , AquaPak" Opened B�(// ri o, ./ ran Date: -7 /PC 192- Signature: �•j Seal a: 7%S 2 S I' I have received these materials in good condition from the above.person. 2. Name: 1 Date: Signature` 'New_ Remarks' ' 2400 HR. -- I have received these materials in good condition from the above person. 3. Name: Date: Signature: Time: Remarkst_' 9400 HR. : J Sealed' l ! Date: //6 40t Trove•." 3/0 �: .' f•IA (Awl .. i Orn Seal it: x//09 Intacf.J'� LAB USE ONLY Opened By: Aqu/Sub. Conic N Seal # 7 7 r7/ ' a, 1061 ./ 1. -- - (®Site �/r M I Environmental Monitoring Laboratories. Inc. 'WWII Bottle Set:F Iv y a 8 Sample Point: ! FIELD INFORMATION FORM Sort . PURGING INFORMATION I -___ _1 I) 4 U I j ! • L J PURGE DOI START PUKE MSM DOI (2l Ng Ckel1 BAKED M115 mete (eaitV0L 111 .�SMG d�IMt MIOE11 PURGING AND SAMPLING EQUIPMENT Purging Equipment Dedicated I Y ; ! M I Sampling Equipment Dedicated t- N I I.... w,w Ia...., Purging Device A -Submersible Pump D -Gas Litt Pump G -Bailer X - $.n ae. lm..a/n Sampling Device I B•Peristaltic Pump E -Venturi Pump H Seopp/$►fpvel X SMi.LMO a.I.. IS..CI.vIw C -Bladder Pump F-Dipper/battle l-PlsOo) Pump Purging Material ATeflon C -Polypropylene E•Polyethylene X._„ r ruior° a.en Islecuvl Sampling Material i 8 -Stainless Steel D -PVC X- LM.•l O army. Isnorn Tubing -Purging ATeflon D -Polypropylene F -Silicon X- .VMYM1 O1r*Jl IS/£Grv. Tubing -Sampling BTygon E -Polyethylene G -Combination teflon/ X. s.Wru.a ar'E. (SPEC." Rope X Polypropylene 15aCIFI Filtering Devices 0.45 M' I A -In -line Disposable B -Pressure C -Vacuum cuurn FIELD MEASUREMENTS Well Elevation tt/msl) j Land Surface Elevation (tvmsl) Depth to water From top of well casing Depth to water I I (ft) From !and surface (R) Groundwater Elevation (Wmsl) Groundwater Elevation (ft/msl) Well Depth I Stickup (R) i5t I a S I (STD) 1st I II V 104 atn25° C in: r Sample Temp.I If 161 I (• C) p. 2nd 11 19� I (sTD) WK. cons. 2nd I V I) I2 to j t 25 C I J D. Ir 3rd I 1810 tt I (STD) MMc. coma 3rd I r P if k at 25° C Mew p..weV1 wr Iww I I I U p. 4th L 1%ja41I (sTD) .p.c. rend Mm/cm 4th 1 V 13 Is b1 at 25° C 1a.w .r..ww .... w.. Mill U . ! •par Ie~ p. COnp pwwlgs..l FIELD COMMENTS Sample Appearance: (Ip- 9 Odor: p e Color: lilt. Turbidity �lsI ! .DDIK.�.1 Weather Conditions: wind peed f../., direction --- V Outlook C�,.t! / /Precipitation Specitic Comments: 5 ...e4 ky ®lam.. _A ilk (9 -u• -e• 4 ;• k (I,. . V c9.1/ I certify that samgjltg procedur were in accordance with applicable EPA, State and WMI protocols - ) " ! rr r Employer.C U L. . � in $ ,� ..CC( G t ID.n , i�•wwl / 931061 6ML FRZA 4/93 n rr I Awl WMI Subcontract/It Environmental Monitoring Laboratories, Inc. FIELD CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY RECORD SITE/FACILITY #lan= SITE NAME: Math l Woe PP: frAnsr}`¢-"• ' Sample Point: kJgtPj'-LA i SAMPLE DATE: - 19111/n 1, 16 YY/met co SAMPLE TIME. I UI 8l t 13 1 01 MATRIX CODE: SOWOe Cope" —4' ... (W) OoeNnni RM'ef .... (01 Surface Walt, "noowaoe.nl . . • (1) ENS aF'944 AF294O- (� AF2940, AF2440 4F2.940 E. AF294O-Y• AF294O--E. AF294-0-fS At72940-I nF294O -J AF294O-It ' Ft. AquaPak- Open Signature: OWN Ia ) bows 5yeeeli IC) O-CanMneal•• (M) R✓ (A) By: (pri I have receiveo these materials in 2. Name: Date: e.elfeat ant IMstiiy • Ie1 Influent (VI EmwN Irl Rn-/SIIee'n,lrMt GAO& or QENf OuRe11 AquaPak^ CONTENT r -mtT�gra CHAIN OF CUSTODY CHRONICLE dition from the abo =.` yin. k'1 k..' 2400 Hit I:/lt (C) (X) Qel'ereuy'1 Pt IG1 Omer 1141 Seec'h FIELD • COMMENTS Time- 2400 HR. Intact:ldj I have received these materialaspood condition from the above maroon...._: 3. Name: Date: AquaPak" SSub 4. Signature: flint 2400 HR. Signature - Rem :gntr. M Sealed 8y. 176- (71.; Date 7 t/6 ifl- • Tune: ./7 :JO HR l a Seal #: Yom_ Intact: 1L • yJI Site # P 3n 4 7 e HELD INFORMATION FORM Bottle Set: 4 V 'All 1.7 b Sample Point: j IRIPLZ .41l Purging Equipment PURGING 1)IFORIAATION 1y�.��. r .44 Wince DATE sr • ELAPSED I"YYgypW O0(°Iv,'m (r io.°D".t PURGING AND SAMPLING EQUIPMENT DedicalacLa-h—I444 Sampling Equipment DedicatrtL V ' ' N 01.10. Purging Device Sampling Device A -Submersible Pump —.8-Peristaltic Pump C -Bladder Pump c- A -Teflon — C -Polypropylene E „lc'B-Stainless Steel 0 -PVC 0 -Gas Litt Pump E -Venturi Pump H F-Dipper/Bottle Purging Material t►, Sampling Material Tubing -Purging I—A•Teflon 0-Polypropyb•ro • F -Silicon X •vacsa (7,.c• IYlcl vi Tubing -Sampling .-t—BTygon E -Polyethylene G-Combinetionteflon/X- C-Rope X- Polypropylene y/J.OyWi m.ln anGrvi ��+ Filtering Devices 0Ae 5,—• 1 A•ln-line Disposable (-Ecry, B -Pressure C•Vacuum Well Elevation Depth to water From top of well casing Groundwater Elevation Well Depth L (Sit) 1st 7: fie 2nd I 170'1 (STD) DII 3rd I PS 13 I (STD) 4th 1 171 - 1(sTD) D" FIELD MEASUREMENTS i l• (ft/rnsh Land Surface Elevation I I ! 1+J, It map Depth to water • 1 (1t) From land surface i (h) (N/msl) (films') (1t) 1st [ t2frb io j .P.c colic. 2nd? PP�'bj .OF cone 3rd I P'19IS bj .D.C end 4th 19\15'13 lei Groundwater Elevation Stcicup fm/cm at 25° C Pmkm at 25° C ym/cm at 25° C t.m/cm at 25° C Sample Temp. I a stioirca, I IIllll Moe p..n.•( .D.C CO*O (a. .°• P Specific Comments• Sample Appearance: G(Ctwn Id nppwOMll Weather Conditions: Wind soled _Cc) f - . / ��%% S Q 7G 1 0u� by! Oi c' 4 5ns1D� M114I /Phi v et 1,// ;•11 (%aa4 XIV& WWeE RIe3Ed port: Lr; nQ . ram IJ Y . i Turbidity FIELD COMMENTS Odor: N• "4 C Color: ,r0 r K Director �. _— Precipitation Yep) Outlook ...f' mit •1' I certify that spplThn pr..:.0 were i�ccocdabce with applicable EPA and State protocols. p 7 //� p) �. ,; : �.," -� R Employer: Q C Lt931961 `., ■ A Sulcontrac : !' r "= 7 �ltttl� Erwironsental Monitoring Laboratories. Inc.,. FIELD CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY RECORD SITE/FACIiLITV aMIS SITENAMitCjaL 1TL" IIII• Sample Point: 144 P L A l SAMPLE DATE: - I I a I 71 / I42 j w r.lrrao //♦ SAMPLE TIME: 14`l 3l : 1 3 101 a MATRIX CODE: wow,' Source Coats' .............. CVO De.el.nnywn.ur. NW.f .... (0) Sunoco Willer Imppunpf eni ... (I) Lrcneb SYSM ....ICJ Gas Con .nrM.:IAir (M PrwnMbr'enf F.o'I'p.. (el r IIUI If11uw.lIrl La - Um. M Oct... O.40911 Y - N • COMMENTS I have received these materials in 9 2. Name: Date: CHAIN OF CUSTODY CHRONICLE Date: 7/ /6 IA • 't *ignati _ •••••":02.- 240t) . I have received these materials,t9 ccnditicn.kom tie above pifaall., a. 3. Name: SSQnatur'; Date' - Rem FIELD. IL �iVNI I EnvirunrnentarhtonftorinS:Laporatories. lnej Bottle ser ''I F I;l kil3 I Sample Point: LI S f'12 A R1e.. Slte # 1 ?It' Rioting Equipment ..:...Deplores' tMF&RM. •.-1"1-1.14,... . PURGING INFOf#AA r I. e rn met Ilk OS cat =Peen ante NG AND SAMPLING EGUIPl Bar . .. N# Serilrxng EPIPPast ...?..: De :17 1t1 -1 Purging Device Sampling Device Purging Mate Sampling Mate Tubing -Purging Tubing -Sampling • .SltnleraM• Pump 0-Gea uSi f itp ' . INP rIsulic Pump E Mitun Pump OSaederPunic) FOippedBodls 1....1t.:1 Ai n 1 .C-Pofyptopywn. h 1 . Nses sale D,PVC 114=th Mellon CP MAW Filtering Devices 0.45 Disposable &Preesuro Well Elevation Depth to water From top of weft casing Groundwater Elevation 3rd -1 _.1 •C„ '�yy 4th �p'CI(STD) t FIELD MEASUFrEMENTt t S-}-�-N' I (MusD Und SurSoe EMvedon Rom ro deraos From and�rt -t-- - --1—t4 I (lama. --tom 1 i 4 1 1 n stickup tat 111 .t ta13j at c p.c. Cana ande1 111114'1g, atat 25:° c wK. are I I1131513-4atzmc I coca ma 4th 111131St% a ZS. C Groundwater anion 4 - Sample Appearance: CIee., Odor A en o Weather Conditions: won sv..e . lc anion "r P,.oaDisrio . vCoulmok 0. a- e. rtz Specific Comment Cr.. o/e Sy ,;, hi,4e L.r4 ;' 4 Lk. Sample Temp. I n>s.w.A1 WNW Porrair 111flls(rc, J, I 1 1.-1 FIELD COMMENTS color: 4If y.tr4 Turf7ldity r4Lt' in accordance wlt*,lppliamie EPA. State and WMI pro�paols. - _ . 921061. EmWarr. " c :,:/p-,sti,c 1 certify that sampliyg ?l,C/Q io.R rof+.w Golder Associates Inc. 200 Union Boulevard, Suite 400 Lakewood. CO USA 80228 Telephone (303) 980-0540 Fax (303) 985.2080 'SEP 7 8 1992 September 17, 1992 Ms. Lori Tagawa Waste Management of North America, Inc. 5660 Greenwood Plaza Boulevard, Suite 400 Englewood, Colorado 80111 Our Ref.: 913-2403 Lv'l4 `�''�v , RE: HYDROGEOLOGIC AND GEOTECHNICAL CFIA.RACTERIZATION FOR THE CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL Dear Ms. Tagawa: In response to a verbal request from Austin Buckingham of the Colorado Department of Health (CDH) to David O'Sadnick of Golder, enclosed is an additional copy of the above - referenced report - Volume I. Please forward the additional copy to the CDH. Note that the following revisions have been made to the report: 1) Page 42: The latter two parameters listed on the table have been corrected to "Trichloroethene" and Tetrachloroethene". 2) Table 6-2: The concentrations of volatile organic compounds detected in monitoring well GWMW-7 have been corrected. In addition, Table 5-2 (Page 1 of 2) may not have been included in all copies of the report previously submitted. Copies of this page are included for use as needed. Replacement pages have been included under cover of this letter for insertion by WMC and the CDH into previously submitted reports.. The enclosed report incorporates the revised pages. If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned. Sincerely, GOLDER ASSOCIATES INC. Ward E. Herst, PG, CEM Senior Hydrogeologist WEH/mya, a yp'T s93 9E1nGt OFFICES INAUSTRAUA, CANADA, GERMANY, HUNGARY, ITALY, SWEDEN, UNITED KINGDOM, UNITED STATES Golder Associate Inc. 200 Union Boulevard. Suite 100 Lakewood. CO USA 80228 Telephone (303) 980.0540 Fox (303) 985.2080 HYDROGEOLOGIC AND GEOTECHNICAL CHARACTERIZATION FOR THE CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL WELD COUNTY, COLORADO VOLUME I Prepared for: Waste Services Corporation 6037 77th Avenue Greeley, CO 80634 Prepared by: Golder Associates Inc. 200 Union Boulevard, Suite 100 Lakewood, CO 80228 (303) 980-0540 July 1992 913-2403 OFFICES IN AUSTRALIA, CANADA. GERMANY, HUNGARY. ITALY. SWEDEN. UNITED KINGDOM. UNITED STATES 921061 July 1992 -i- 913-2403 TABLE OF CONTENTS East 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Purpose 1 1.2 Background 1 1.3 Site Description 1 1.3.1 Natural and Geologic Hazards 2 1.3.2 Climate 3 1.3.3 Population 4 1.3.4 Permitted Water Wells 4 1.3.5 Site History 5 1.4 Previous Investigations 6 1.5 Report Organization 7 2.0 FIELD INVESTIGATION PROGRAM 8 2.1. Drilling and Soil Sampling 9 2.1.1 Geotechnical Borings 9 2.1.2 Groundwater Monitoring Well Borings 10 2.1.3 Soil Gas Probe Borings 12 2.2 Monitoring Well Installation Procedures 12 2.3 Landfill Soil Gas Probe Installation Procedures 14 2.4 Groundwater Monitoring Well Development 16 2.5 In -Situ Hydraulic Testing 16 2.5.1 Methodology 16 2.5.2 Results of In -Situ Hydraulic Testing 18 2.6 Water Quality Sampling 19 2.6.1 Groundwater Monitoring Well Sampling 19 2.6.2 Surface Water Sampling 22 921061 Golder Associates July 1992 -ii- 913-2403 TABLE OF CONTENTS —continued ragl 3.0 GEOLOGY 24 3.1 Physiographic and Geologic Setting 24 3.2 Stratigraphy 24 3.2.1 The Surficia. Unconsolidated Unit 25 3.2.2 The Upper Weathered Bedrock Unit 25 3.2.3 The Lower Weathered Bedrock Unit 27 4.0 HYDROGEOLOGY 29 4.1 Results of Previous Investigations 29 4.2 Hydraulic Conductivity 30 4.2.1 In -Situ Hydraulic Conductivity 30 4.2.2 Laboratory Permeability Testing 30 4.3 Horizontal Groundwater Flow 31 4.3.1 Upper Weathered Bedrock 31 4.3.3 Lower Weathered Bedrock 33 4.4 Vertical Groundwater Flow 34 4.5 Depth to Groundwater in Landfilled Areas 34 5.0 LABORATORY SOILS TESTING 35 5.1 Summary of Laboratory Soils Testing 35 5.2 Natural Moisture Content 36 5.3 Specific Gravity 36 5.4 Permeability 37 5.5 Geochemical Characteristics 38 5.5.1 Cation Exchange Capacity 38 5.5.2 Soil/Rock pH 39 Golder Associates 921961 July 1992 913-2403 TABLE OF CONTENTS --continued 6.0 RESULTS OF WATER QUALITY ANALYSES 40 6.1 Volatile Organic Compounds 41 6.2 Pesticides and Herbicides 43 6.3 Trace Metals 43 6.4 Nutrients 45 6.5 Major Anions and Cations 45 6.6 Radionuclides and Radioactivity 46 7.0 VALIDATION OF ANALYTICAL DATA 48 7.1 Sample Preservation and Holding Times 48 7.2 Instrument Calibration and Tuning 49 7.3 Blank Sample Results 49 7,4 Surrogate Recoveries 50 7.5 Control Sample Recoveries 51 7.6 Field Duplicates 51 8.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 53 8.1 Geology 53 8.2 Hydrogeology 54 8.3 Water Quality 55 9.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 58 10.0 REFERENCES 59 J.?,1' OF TABLES Table 1-1 Table 1-2 Table 2-1 Table 2-2 Table 2-3 Table 4-1 Table 4-2 Table 4-3 Table 5-1 Central Weld County Census, 19:30-1990 Permitted Wells Within One Mile of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill Soil Gas Probe, Monitoring Well, and Geotechnical Borings Summary Summary of In -Situ Permeability Testing Weld County Landfill Sample Containers, Preservation and Filtration Central Weld Sanitary Landfill Water Level Elevations Summary of Vertical Gradients at the Groundwater Monitoring Well Pairs Summary of Water Levels in Landfilled Areas Summary of Soil Data Golder Associates 9:1061 July 1992 -iv- 913-2403 Table 5-2 Table 5-3 Table 6-1 Table 6-2 Table 6-3 Table 6-4 Table 6-5 TABLE OF CONTENTS —Continued LIST OF TABLES —Continued Summary of Laboratory Permeability Test Results Results of Cation Exchange Capacity (CEC) and pH Analyses Volatile Organic Compounds Analyzed in Water Quality Samples Summary of Volatile Organic Compounds in Water Quality Samples Trace Metals Detected in Water Quality Samples Nutrients Detected in Water Quality Samples Radionuclides and Radioactivity Detected in Water Quality Samples LISIDEZIOIEEL Figure 1-1 Regional Site Location Map Figure 1-2 General Site Location Map Figure 1-3 Site Features Figure 1-4 Seismic Hazard Map - Denver & Surrounding Area Figure 1-5 Permitted Wells Within a One Mile Radius of the Site Figure 1-6 Site Map Showing Locations of Hydrogeologic Data Collection Points Prior to the Current Investigation Figure 2-1 Site Location Map Showing Monitoring Wells, Soil Gas Probes, Boreholes, Piezometers, Surface Water Sampling Points and Line of Geologic Fence Diagram Figure 2-2 Typical Shallow Monitoring Well Construction Detail Figure 2-3 Typical Deep Monitoring Well Construction Detail Figure 2-4 Typical Landfill Gas Monitoring Well Single Probe Figure 3-1 Base of the Laramie -Fox Hills Aquifer Figure 3-2 Geologic Fence Diagram Figure 3-3A Top of Upper Weathered Bedrock Contours (11"x17') Figure 3-3B Top of Upper Weathered Bedrock Contours (30"x42") Figure 3-4 Approximate Thickness of Upper Weathered Bedrock Figure 3-5 Top of Lower Weathered Bedrock Contours Figure 4-lA Shallow Groundwater Potentiometric Surface Contour Map (11"x17") Figure 4-1B Shallow Groundwater Potentiometric Surface Contour Map (30"x42") Figure 4-2 Deep Groundwater Potentiometric Surface Contour Map Figure 6-1 Trilinear Diagram of Water Quality Samples Golder Associates 921061 • • 0 July 1992 -v- 913-2403 TABLE OF CONTENTS —Continued LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs Appendix B Groundwater Monitoring Well Logs Appendix C Landfill Soil Gas Probe Logs Appendix D Landfill Soil Gas Probe Construction Summaries Appendix E Groundwater Monitoring Well Construction Summaries Appendix F Sample Integrity Data Sheets Appendix G Grain Size Distribution Curves and Compaction Test Results Appendix H In -Situ Hydraulic Testing Hvorslev Curves and Calculations Appendix I Water Quality Results Golder Associates 921061 • • July 1992 -1- 913-2403 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Puroose The purpose of this report is to present the results of the recent field activities performed by Golder Associates, Inc. (Golder) to characterize the site hydrogeologic, geochemical and geotechnical conditions present at the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. The objective of the investigation was to characterize the site conditions to a degree sufficient to allow development of a site hydrogeologic conceptual model. The conceptual hydrogeologic model will be used to design environmental monitoring systems for groundwater, surface water, and landfill gas. 1.2 Background Waste Services Corporation (WSC), an affiliate of Waste Management of Colorado, Inc. (WMC), operates a 110 -acre landfill known as the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. The landfill currently accepts household, commercial and industrial solid waste. No hazardous or radioactive wastes are accepted by the facility. 1.3 Site_Dcscription The facility is located in the southwest corner of Section 32, T.56N., R.66W., approximately 5 miles southwest of Greeley, Colorado (Figure 1-1). The site is located within a region of gently rolling topography. Elevations of the undisturbed portions of the site range from 4750 feet to 4840 feet (National Geodetic Survey Datum of 1929). The Big Thompson River lies approximately one-half mile south of the site as shown on Figure 1-2. The confluence of the Big Thompson River and the South Platte River is situated approximately two miles east of the site. A series of manmade ponds, referred to as Spomer Lakes, are present outside the western edge of the site. A diversion ditch extends along the Golder Associates 921061 July 1992 -2- 913-2403 northern and eastern boundaries of the site to channel shallow groundwater around the landfill. Flow in the diversion trench is directed either west and south into the Spomer Takes drainage or east and south into an on -site retention pond. The northeastern and eastern portion of the diversion trench are underlain by a french drain system. The french drain is generally about nine feet below the elevation of the trench and was installed to maintain water levels beneath the landfill. Additional groundwater flow is directed into Spomer Lakes via a landfill underdrain installed in 1982 to control water levels under the landfill. The underdrain runs north -south under the western portion of the landfill and discharges into one of the Spomer Lakes. Figure 1-3 illustrates the diversion ditch, Spomer Lakes, retention pond, underdrain, and other on -site facilities. No airports are within 10,000 feet of the site (USDOT-FAA, verbal communication, 1992). 1.3.1 Natural and Geologic Hazards The site is not located within a 100 -year floodplain. According to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the site is classified as Zone C, subject to minimal flooding (FEMA Map # 080266-0750C, 1982). The EPA has defined a seismic impact zone as "an arm with a 10% or greater probability that the maximum horizontal acceleration in lithitled earth material, expressed as a percentage of the earth's gravitational pull,...will exceed 0.10g in 250 yeas". The nearest potentially active faults are the Rocky Mountain Arsenal Fault and the Valmor,.t Fault which are located approximately twenty-seven miles to the south (Kirkham and Rogers, 1981). The large distance to an active fault zone indicates that seismic impacts are unlikely to be significant at the landfill. The lack of significant potential seismic impact; at the site is substantiated by work conducted by Algermissen, et al, (1982), who determined that the site does not meet the criteria for a. seismic Golder Associates 921061 July 1992 -3- 913-2403 impact zone. Algermissen, et al, determined that the site has a 10% probability that the maximum horizontal acceleration in lithified material will exceed 0.08g in 250 years (Figure 1). The nearest underground coal mine is approximately one mile south of the site (Amuedo and Ivey, 1975), which suggests that subsidence due to mining activities is not significant at the landfill. The area surrounding the landfill is composed of low, rolling hills. The potential for landslides in the undisturbed areas is considered to be minimal. 1.3.2 Climate Local climatic conditions in the vicinity of the site are monitored by a weather station in Greeley. The site is characterized by semiarid conditions on the Colorado Piedmont section of the Great Plains Physiographic Province (Hansen„ 1978). Based on the 84 -year record at the Greeley weather station, Hansen (1978) reports that the temperature varies between a January mean of 24.7° F and a July mean of 72.3° F. The lowest recorded temperature was -45° F and the highest recorded temperature was 107° F. The mean annual precipitation for the area is 11.1 inches, with a recorded minimum of 5.4 inches and a maximum of 20.9 inches. Mean precipitation for the months of April through September is 8.9 inches. The maximum recorded 24 -hour precipitation event is 3.4 inches. The mean annual relative humidity is 50%-55%, andthe mean annual evaporation rate is 70-80 inches. The prevailing wind direction is toward the east. Golder Associates 9.31961 July 1992 -4- 913-2403 1.3.3 poation The geographical area surrounding the Central Weld County Landfill is primarily unincorporated and rural and is included in the Weld County Johnstown -Milliken Division. Census data for the unincorporated rural area is not directly available. However, an estimate for the unincorporated area can be obtained by subtracting incorporated populations from the population of the entire Weld County Johnstown -Milliken Division. Population figures for the division are available from the 1980 and 1990 census. The division as a. whole increased in population 2.09%, from 7025 to 7172 during this period. Net unincorporated area population declined from 3628 in 1980 to 3396 in 1990, a 6.39% decrease. Table 1-1 details census data for the Johnstown -Milliken Division. 1.3.4 Permitted Water_Welli Figure 1-5 illustrates the location of permitted water wells within a one mile radius of the landfill. As shown on Figure 1-5, a total of 20 wells are permitted by the Colorado State Engineer to witt draw water within a one mile radius of the landfill. These wells are generally permitted for domestic or irrigation use. Based on the topography of the area and proximity of the Big Thompson River south of the site, it is anticipated that shallow groundwater flow is towards the south and southeast. Three permitted wells are located south and southeast of the landfill between the landfill and the Big Thompson River. The closest of these wells is approximately 2000 feet from the landfill. As shown on Table 1-2, two of the three wells are reported to be completed at shallow depths (i.e., less than 40 feet deep) and are permitted for domestic and stock use. Accordingly, these two wells represent potential receptor points for shallow groundwater which might be impacted by the landfill. Golder Assoc totes 9:O61 July 1992 -5- 913-2403 Information contained in the State Engineer's files can occasionally be outdated. The Central Weld Water District and Little Thompson Water District were contacted to determine if a public water supply has been extended to the area south of the landfill. Based on information supplied by the water district personnel, a public water supply has not been extended to the area. An additional permitted well is located east of the landfill (Figure 1-5). The depth of this well has not been reported to the Colorado State Engineer. However, based on available information this well is not downgradient of the landfill. 1.3.5 Site History Landfill operations may have begun at the site as early as 1967. The original Certificate of Designation (CD) for the site was issued by Weld County to Earl Moffat on October 6, 1971. Browning Ferris Industries (BFI) operated the site until 1976; it is not known when operational responsibility was transferred from Mr. Moffat to EFL Ralph and Barbara Roweder (Weld Landfill, Inc.) operated the site from 1976 until June of 1979, when interest in the property was sold to Mr. C. Lynn Keirnes, of Colorado Landfill, Inc. The site was subsequently owned and operated by Waste Services Inc. from December, 1985 until 1989 (under Lynn Keirnes). In 1989, Waste Services, Inc. became Waste Services Corp. (WSC) under Mr. Brad Keirnes. On July 12, 1991 WSC merged with Waste Management of Colorado, Inc. (WMC), an operating division of Waste Management of North America (WMNA). The facility is on the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) list due to alleged disposal of pesticide and radioactive waste during the period 1973 to 1976. Placement on this list indicates that the site is under investigation for inclusion on the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) National Priority List (NPL). A preliminary assessment of the site was conducted in 1987 by the Colorado Department of Health (CDH). Through review of Weld County Health Department records and an on -site investigation, the CDH found no groundwater, surface water, or air contamination. Golder Associates 931061 July 1992 6- 913-2403 The site currently accepts only solid waste and special wastes including petroleum contaminated soils and non -friable asbestos. Liquid sludges and hazardous wastes are not accepted. The two primary areas yet to be landfilled include the northeastern and southeastern portions of the site. A residence is located in the eastern portion of the site. The residence must be removed prior to landfilling in this area. 1.4 Previous Investigations Previous investigations at the site include: ► Warzyn Engineering Inc., 1984,"Hydrogeologic Assessment, Greeley Landfill, Weld County, Colorado." ► Industrial Compliance, 1991, "Ground -Water Investigation, Waste Services Corporation, Central Weld Sanitary Landfill." The Warzyn, 1984, report was based on a field investigation program which consisted of installing five shallow groundwater monitoring wells (GWMW-1 through GWMW-5), conducting in -situ permeability tests, and water quality (groundwater and surface water) sampling. The geology, hydrogeology, and water quality of the site were evaluated in this report. The ndustrial Compliance, 1991, report involved characterizing the site for the potential of leachate and methane generation. In addition, an evaluation of the conceptual design of a diversion ditch was presented. The field investigation involved the installation of seven trash piezometers (TP-1 through TP-7) and installation of piezometers (P-1 through P-10). The locations of previous data collection pointsare presented on Figure 1-6. The trash piezometers remain active monitoring points and were utilized during this investigation. Eight of the 10 piezometers installed by Industrial Compliance were decommissioned during construction of the diversion trench. Piezometers P-1 and P-2 remain active and are included in this report. Golder Associates 9:106:1 • • July 1992 -7- 913-2403 1.5 Rosuiareanintion The following sections present a detailed summary of the Golder investigation. Section 2 discusses the field investigative program. Sections 3 and 4, respectively, summarize the geology and hydrogeology of the site. Section 5 presents the results of laboratory soils tasting conducted to characterize the physical and mechanical properties of the geologic materials. Results of water quality sampling are discussed in Section 6. Validation of the analytical laboratory water quality results are summarized in Section 7. A summary and conclusions section is included as Section 8. Recommendations are made in Section 9. References are presented in Section 10. Golder Associates 921061 July 1992 -8- 913-2403 2.0 ECELDIESIMATIaLER0SIAM Based on the data collected by Warzyn and Industrial Compliance, additional field investigative activities were conducted. The field investigative program was designed to provide supplemental geologic, hydrogeologic, and geochemical conditions at the site. These data were obtained through installation of additional monitoring points, in -situ hydraulic testing, and water quality sampling. Each of these field activities is discussed in the following sections. Between February 13 and March 27, 1992 drilling and soil sampling were conducted as the first phase of the Golder hydrogeologic and geotechnical study for the site, in accordance with the "Fiydrogeologic and Geotechnical Characterization Work Plan for the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, Weld County, Colorado" (Golder, 1992). Geotechnical and geologic logging and soil sampling were conducted on all boreholes drilled during this field program. Seven geotechnical borings, designated as GT-1 through GT-7, were drilled for the purpose of soil sampling and site characterization. Monitoring wells were installed in three 'shallow" boreholes, designated as GWMW-SN, GWMW-6 and GWMW-7, and seven "deep" boreholes, designated as GWMW- 8 through GWMW-14. Monitoring wells were installed to provide supplemental information regarding shallow groundwater and to define hydrogeologic conditions at greater depths than had previously been investigated. In addition, 21 boreholes were drilled in order to install soil gas probes to monitor water levels and landfill gas concentrations. Soil gas probes were designated as SG -1 through SG -10 and SG -12 through SG -21. Borehole SG -11 was drilled; however, a soil gas probe was not installed in this hole. See Section 2.1.3 for further discussion. As the drilling program progressed, well development, groundwater sampling, and surface water sampling were initiated. Slug testing was performed on all groundwater monitoring wells at the site, including previously installed wells, in order to obtain estimates of in -situ hydraulic conductivities. Laboratory testing of soil and rock samples was initiated soon after the first samples were collected to characterize the physical and mechanical properties of the geologic materials at the site. Golder Associates • • July 1992 -9- 913-2403 2.1 Drilling and Soil Sampling Drilling Engineers of Fort Collins, Colorado conducted the drilling and soil/rock sampling activities at the site under the supervision of Golder engineers and geologists. A Central Mine Equipment (CME) 55 drilling rig was used for all drilling at the site. Soil sampling was accomplished by using either an 18 -inch long split spoon or a 5 -foot long CME continuous sample barrel. Rock coring for the deep groundwater monitoring wells was conducted by air rotary methods. A Grimmer -Schmidt, 800 cubic feet per minute (CFM) output air compressor was used to supply down -hole air for rock coring. The air compressor was equipped with an internal filter as well as an in -line filter. No water was injected during rock coring operations. A summary of all geotechnical borings, monitoring wells and soil gas probe installations appears in Table 2-1. Figure 2-1 is a site map showing location of all borings, groundwater monitoring well installations and soil gas probes. 2.1.1 Geotechnical Borings Seven geotechnical borings (GT-1 through GT-7) were drilled in order to characterize geologic materials, particularly the fine-grained materials, near the ground surface in areas not yet landfilled. The locations of the geotechnical borings are shown on Figure 2-1. Geotechnical borings were advanced through surficial soil material and into underlying bedrock. Depths of geotechnical borings ranged from 23 to 30 feet below ground surface. The boreholes were drilled using 3.25 -inch inside diameter (ID) hollow -stem augers. Soil sampling was accomplished using a 5 -foot long, CME continuous sample barrel. Continuous sampling allows for complete profiling of the borehole. Data included in the geotechnical boring logs (Appendix A) include surveyed locations, ground surface elevations, drilling dates, soil and rock descriptions, sampling methods, recoveries and depth to groundwater. All geologic material retrieved during sampling was preserved in polyethylene bags for possible laboratory analyses at the Golder soils laboratory in Denver, Colorado. After drilling, the boreholes were grouted to ground surface using a cement/bentonite grout. Since borehole integrity was good and the boreholes were shallow, a tremie pipe was not necessary for grouting. Golder Associates 931061 July 1992 -10- 913-2403 2.1.2 Qroundwater Monitoring Well B9rings Ten boreholes were drilled to allow installation of groundwater monitoring wells (GWMW-6 through GWMW-14, and GWMW-5N) and to characterize geologic materials. GWMW 8 through GWMW-12 are deep wells which were sited adjacent to pre-existing shallow wells (GWMW-1 through GWMW-5) for the purpose of acstssing deep!r geologic and hydrologic systems at this site. Two shallow/deep well pairs GWMW-6/GWMW-13, and GWMW-7/GWMW-14 were sited in the southwestern portion of the site where coverage from the previous groundwater monitoring program was deemed inadequate. The locations of the monitoring wells are shown on Figure 2-1. Appendix B contains borehole logs for GWMW-5N through GWMW-14. Shallow boreholes GWMW-6 and GW1v1W-7 were drilled with 3.25 -inch ID hollow -stem augers. Split spoon samples were taken at 5 -foot intervals, starting at a depth of 4 feet below ground surface. Adjacent deep boreholes GWMW-13 and GWMW-14 were drilled with 3.25 -inch ID hollow -stem augers to a depth corresponding to 15 feet below the base of the adjacent shallow well then were advanced to the total depth by rock coring. Because of the close proximity of the deep boreholes to the previously drilled shallow boreholes, the deep boreholes were sampled only at depths below the base of the adjacent shallow borehole. Shallow borehole GWMW-5N was also drilled with 3.25 -inch ID hollow stem augers. Soil samples were not collected from this borehole, since it was drilled adjacent to borehole GWMW- 12 (Figure 2-1). Continuous soil sampling was conducted during drilling of GWMW-12. Prior to advancement by rock coring, deep boreholes GWMW-9, GWMW-11 and GWMW-12 were drilled with 3.25 -inch hollow -stem augers and sampled at 5 -foot intervals using split spoons to a depth corresponding to 15 feet below the total depth of the adjacent, pre-existing wells. Prior to rock coring to total depth, deep boreholes GWMW-8 and GWMW-10 were augured to a grey, silty fine sandstone contact, which had been identified in the previously drilled deep boreholes (GWMW-9, GWMW-11, GWMW-13, and GWMW-14). Total depth of the deep Odder Associates 931061 -11- 913-2403 boreholes was designed to allow for completion of the screened intervals within the grey, silty fine sandstone which was used as a marker bed. Permanent new steel casings (6 -inch 1D with welded -in -place joints) were installed in all of the deep GWMW boreholes from 1 -foot below ground surface to 15 feet below the base of the adjacent shallow well. The exception was GWMW-11 in which the steel casing was advanced to 25 feet below the base of the adjacent well (GWMW-4) since material above that depth was not competent enough to hold the permanent steel casing in place. In all deep boreholes (GWMW-8 through GWMW-12) the annulus between the steel casing and the borehole was grouted with a cement/bentonite mixture and allowed to set-up for approximately 24 hours before rock coring began. An NX-size borehole was then advanced by air -rotary methods to a depth corresponding to 15 feet below the top of the grey, silty fine sandstone. Once the total depth was reached by rock coring methods, a tri-cone bit was used to increase the diameter of the borehole to 8 inches in preparation for installation of the monitoring well. All down -hole equipment was steam -cleaned with a high temperature, high pressure sprayer between boreholes. Soil retrieved from split spoon sampling was preserved in polyethylene bags for possible laboratory analysis. Rock core which was not preserved for laboratory analysis was placed in cardboard core boxes. Rock core which was chosen for laboratory analysis was preserved in the manner described below. The rock core sample field preservation technique included wrapping the sample in a layer of plastic followed by a layer of aluminum foil and a sample identification label. The sample was then dipped in melted wax. The wax was allowed to harden and the sample was placed in a polyethylene bag. Preserved rock samples were placed in PVC tubes for transport to the Golder soils laboratory in Denver, Colorado. 931061 July 1992 -12- 913-2403 2.1.3 Soil Gas pro Borin Twenty-one borings for soil gas probes designated as SG -1 through SG -21 were drilled at the site (Figure 2-1). Soil gas probe SG -11 will be installed during future site activities. The borings were generally spaced approximately 500 feet apart along the perimeter of the site. In addition, one boring (SG -10) was sited near the gate house, one boring (SG -14) was sited near the residence and one boring (SG -15) was sited near the machine shop. These three borings were situated between their respective buildings and landfilled areas in order to detect the potential occurrence of landfill gas. Soil gas probe borings were drilled with hollow -stem augers (either 3.25 -inch or 4.25 -inch ID) and sampled with a 5 -foot long, CME continuous sample barrel. All soil and rock samples were preserved in polyethylene bags for possible laboratory analysis at the Golder soils laboratory in Denver, Colorado. Logs for the soil gas probe boreholes are presented in Appendix C. 2.2 Monitoring Well Installation Procedures Ten monitoring wells were installed as part of the hydrogeologic characterization, the locations of which are shown on Figure 2-1. Two monitoring wells (GWMW-6 and GWMW-7) were installed to characterize the shallow groundwater system in areas where data collection points were absent. Seven monitoring wells (GWMW-8 through GWMW-14) were installed to monitor a deeper groundwater system. One shallow monitoring well (GWMW-5N) was installed to replace GWMW-5 which is located outside of the site property boundary. Monitoring wells were installed into the borings described in Section 2.1.2. Figures 2-2 and 2-3 illustrate typical construction details for the shallow and deep monitoring wells, rc,poc.tively. Monitoring well construction summaries are presented in Appendix D. Stratigraphic descriptions are shown on each monitoring well construction summary. Shallow monitoring wells were completed within the hollow -stem augers. Deep monitoring wells were completed within the permanent steel casing (as described in Section 2.1.2) and below that depth in the open borehole. Golder Associates 931061 July 1992 -13- 913-2403 Centralizers were installed in the deep groundwater monitoring wells (GWMW-8 through GWMW. 14) since the wells were constructed in open boreholes. All monitoring wells were constructed with 2 -inch, flush -threaded Schedule -40 PVC. All pipe joints were fitted with 0 - rings and were further sealed with teflon tape. Flush -threaded end caps, approximately 2 -inches long, were attached to the base of each screen to reduce the possibility of sediment migration into the monitoring wells. A PVC slip cap was placed over the top of the riser. After installation of the PVC screen and riser pipe into the hole, a primary filter pack, consisting of medium -grained sand (10/20 silica sand) was placed into the annular space surrounding the PVC. The filter pack generally extended at least 3 feet above the top of the screened interval. During construction of the shallow wells, the hollow -stem augers were slowly withdrawn and the rate of sand flow into the borehole was restricted to allow for settlement. Hollow -stem augers did not remain in the deep wells during construction; however, the rate of flow of the filter sand into the borehole was sufficiently restricted to allow for proper settlement and reduce the potential for bridging. Following filter pack placement, a minimum of 3 feet of bentonite chips was placed in the borehole annulus above the filter pack to seal off the screened interval from the overlying geologic materials. A cement/bentonite grout slurry composed of eight parts Portland cement one part to bentonite powder was placed above the bentonite seal to a depth of approximately 3 feet below ground surface to prevent downward migration of infiltrated water through the borehole. Monitoring well construction was completed by installing a 6 -inch square by 7 -feet long, locking anodized aluminum protective cover over the PVC riser. The protective cover was set in approximately 2 -feet of concrete to reduce the potential for infiltration of surface water and to provide a firm foundation for the protective casing. The annular space between the protective cover and the riser was filled with bentonitc chips to ground surface, above which 114 -inch pea gravel was placed to within 6 -inches of the top of the riser. Weep holes were drilled in the Golder Associates 9:1061 • • July 1992 -14- 913-2403 protective coven approximately 6 -inches above ground surface to provide an outlet for any water that might be introduced inside the protective cover. The northing and casting coordinates, ground surface elevations and top of PVC riser elevations were determined by Stewart and Associates, a local surveying firm. All down -hole equipment such as hollow -stem augers, center plugs, center rods and sampling devices were steam -cleaned before the first borehole was drilled and between etch boring. All monitoring well screens and riser pipe were supplied by Johnson Filtration Systems, were factory cleaned, and were transported to the site wrapped in clean plastic. The use of factory cleaned and wrapped PVC eliminated the need for steam -cleaning prior to installation. 2.3 Landfill Soil Gas Pr9be Installation Procedure' Twenty landfill soil gas probes. designated SG -1 through SG -10 and SG -12 through SG -21 were installed as part of the site characterization. Soil gas probe SG -11 will be installed during future site activities. Depths of the soil gas probes ranged from 8 to 46 feet below ground surface. The locations of the soil gas probes are shown on Figure 2-1. Seventeen soil gas probe locations were sited at approximately 500 foot centers around the perimeter of the site. An additional three soil gas probes were sited near landfill buildings. Downhole equipment was decontaminated by steam -cleaning prior to drilling the soil gas probe boreholes. Since the soil gas probes arc not designed for use as groundwater monitoring points, decontamination between boreholes was not conducted. Figure 2-4 presents a typical soil gas probe construction detail. The soil gas probes were constructed within the hollow -stem augers when borehole integrity was questionable. However, the majority of the boreholes were relatively shallow and were sufficiently stable to allow construction in the open borehole. Filter pack for the soil gas probes consists of 1/4" diameter pea gravel. Therefore open borehole construction was preferable because the large diameter of the filter pack presented a high potential for bridging between the interior of the augers and the casing. Open borehole construction provided a larger annulus Golder Associates 9:21061 July 1992 -15- 913-2403 between the casing and the borehole, which decreased the probability of bridging of the filter pack. All soil gas probes were constructed with 1 -inch diameter, Schedule 40 PVC. Soil gas screens consist of either 5 -feet or 10 -feet sections of 0.010 -inch factory slotted Schedule 40 PVC. Slip caps, approximately 1 -inch in length, were attached t,o the base of the screened section. Slip caps fitted with quick -connect valves were attached to the top of the riser section to provide soil gas monitoring points. Soil gas probe boreholes were extended below the water table or below the inferred base of solid waste, whichever occurred first. The screened intervals for the soil gas probes generally extend from 2 feet above the base of the boring to 6 feet below ground surface. In one instance (SG -5) groundwater was present less than 6 feet below the surface. The top of the screened interval for SG -5 was placed closer to the ground surface to maximize efficiency of this soil gas probe. Soil gas probe filter pack consists of 1/4 -inch diameter pea gravel and generally extends from 2 feet below the base of the screened interval to 2 feet above the screened interval. The pea gravel layer is generally overlain by a 1 -foot thick layer of 16/40 silica sand. Filter sand was not placed in soil gas probes SG -5 and SG -9 because of their shallow completion depths. A bentonite seal consisting of a 1 -foot thick layer of bentonite chips generally extends to within 2 - feet below the ground surface. Soil gas probe construction was completed by installing a 6 -inch square by 5 -feet long, locking anodized aluminum protective cover over the PVC riser. The protective cover was set in approximately 2 -feet of concrete. The annular space between the protective cover and the riser was filled with bentonite chips to ground surface, above which 1/4 -inch pea gravel was placed to within 6 -inches of the top of the riser. Weep holes were drilled in the protective covers approximately 6 -inches above ground surface to provide an outlet for any water that might be introduced inside the protective cover. The northing and casting coordinates, ground surface elevations and top of PVC riser elevations were determined by Stewart and Associates, a local surveying firm. Landfill soil gas probe construction summaries are presented in Appendix A. Golder Associates 921061 July 1992 -16- 913-2403 2.4 Groundwater Monitorne Well Development During the period from March 17 through March 23, 1992, Golder engineering technicians conducted groundwater monitoring well development for all wells installed as part of the field activities (i.e., GWMW-5N through GWMW-14). The groundwater monitoring wells were developed in order to remove sediment and water associated with installation and to ensure effective hydraulic communication with the geologic formation. With the exception of monitoring well GWMW-5N, well development was accomplished by using a Hydrostar sand pump. The pump was not in contact with groundwater. All downhole pipe which did contact groundwater was steam -cleaned prior to development of each well. The pump was driven by a portable air compressor equipped with an inline oil and water filter, thus reducing the risk of contamination. Each well except GWMW-SN was developed by pumping for a minimum of four hours. Monitoring well GWMW-5N was developed by hand -bailing for eight hours. During the development process, pH and conductivity of discharge water were monitored for stability. Details concerning well development are included in the Monitoring Well Construction Summaries which are presented in Appendix E. 2.5 b -Situ Hydraulic Testing 2.5.1 Methodology In -situ hydraulic testing was conducted by Golder hydrogeologists and engineering techniciats on April 6 and 7, 1992. All groundwater monitoring wells were tested including those previously installed (GWMW-1 through GWMW-5) and those installed by Golder (GWMW-5N through GWMW-14). Data collected during well development and groundwater sampling indicated that rising head slug tests would provide the most effective means of estimating near - Golder Associate .9.i.r6t July 1992 -17- 913-2403 borehole hydraulic properties at the site. Therefore, in -situ permeability testing consisted of rising head slug tests. A rising head slug test involves the removal of a small volume of water (or slug) from the well and then monitoring the recovery over time. Recovery data as a function of time were used to estimate hydraulic conductivities by the Hvorslev (1951) method. The Hvorslev slug test rising head solution, suitable for wells over short intervals, is given as: where; K'(d l)2 ZDL)1 8LT K = hydraulic conductivity dth, = effective diameter m = Mat K, = horizontal hydraulic conductivity IS, = vertical hydraulic conductivity L = the screened interval (if the static water level is above the top of the screen); or, the difference between the static water level and the bottom of the screened interval (if the static water level is below the top of the screen) D = the borehole diameter T = elapsed time For this investigation, K. is assumed to be ten times higher than K,,. Golder Associates SZ1.061 • July 1992 -18- 913-2403 2.5.2 Results of In -Situ Hydraulic Testing Estimates of hydraulic conductivities were obtained from in -situ hydraulic conductivity testing data by the Hvorslev method as illustrated in Section 2.5.1. To illustrate this method of analysis, a sample calculation using recovery data from GWMW-14 is presented below. The accompanying Hvorslev curve is presented in Figure H-15. tin -0.176 12 in/fr m=3.16 L=10.00fr D-0.6886 T"41.64m1n (0.17 ft)21n(2(3.16)(10.00 ft)] K, 0.688 ft 8(10.00 6)(41.64 min) K -1.99x10-' cm/sec The effective diameter d,,, was calculated using the borehole diameter, the riser pipe internal diameter and an assumed porosity of 0.30 for the filter pack. When drawdown occurs solely within the riser pipe the value for de is the diameter of the pipe. However, when drawdown takes place within the screened interval, the effective diameter is equal to the difference between the riser diameter and the annulus diameter multiplied by the assumed porosity of the filter pack, which is then added to the diameter of the riser pipe. Golder Associates 921.161. July 1992 -19- 913-2403 A summary of the estimated hydraulic conductivity for each of the wells is provided in Table 2-2. Included in Table 2-2 are values for geometric mean hydraulic conductivities for the shallow wells (GWMW-1 through GWMW-7) and for the deep wells (GWMW-8 through GWMW-14), as are the types of geologic materials tested. Since bedrock units at the site are typically fairly coarse -grained materials (silty sandstone and sandy siltstone), interlayered with fine-grained materials (claystone), the values for hydraulic conductivity estimated by in -situ hydraulic testing likely represent horizontal permeabilities of the coarse -grained materials. 2.6 Water Quality Sampling 2.6.1 Groundwater Monitoring Well Sampling Monitoring wells GWMW-1 through GWMW-14 were sampled in order to provide groundwater quality information for the site. Groundwater samples were coUected by a Golder engineering technician between March 25 and March 31, 1992. Groundwater analyses were performed by Enseco Rocky Mountain Analytical Laboratory of Wheat Ridge, Colorado. Groundwater samples were analyzed for concentration of the following parameters: ► Volatile organics; • Pesticides (Endrin, Lindane, Methoxychlor and Toxaphene); ► Herbicides [2,4-D, 2,4,5-TP, (Silvex)j; ► Dissolved metals (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, iron, lead, manganese, mercury, selenium and silver); ► Nutrients (Nitrate and Ammonia); ► Anion parameters (sulfate, bicarbonate, carbonate and chloride); ► Major cation parameters (magnesium, calcium, potassium and sodium); and, ► Radionuclides (gross alpha, gross beta, radium 226 and radium 228). Golder Associates •7y1.'J9- • July 1992 -20- 913-2403 A discussion of water quality analytical results is presented in Section 6.0. Water levels were recorded for each monitoring well immediately prior to purging. Approximately three casing volumes of groundwater were purged from each monitoring well immediately prior to sample collection, providing that the well did not first bail dry. The monitoring wells were purged and sampled by using either a Hydrostar pump, stainless steel bailer or teflon bailer. Field parameters consisting of temperature, pH and specific conductance were recorded during the purging process to ensure that groundwater samples were representative of formation water. Field parameter measurements are presented on the groundwater monitoring well construction summaries included as Appendix E. The Hydrostar pump and downhole PVC sampling pipe were steam -cleaned before sampling and between each monitoring well using water from a WMC-approved, onsite source. The stainless steel bailer was decontaminated before any sampling took place and between sampling each monitoring well. The decontamination process consisted of first rinsing the equipment with a solution of phosphate -free Liquinox try detergent and distilled water, which was followed by a methanol rinse, and completed with a triple distilled water rinse. New polypropylene rope was used for each well and discarded after use. A new pair of disposable, sanitized surgical gloves was worn by sampling personnel at each sampling point. The groundwater samples were collected from either the stainless steel bailer or the Hydrostar pump discharge tube. The groundwater samples were placed into clean plastic bottles and immediately transferred into the appropriate sample preservation containers provided by the laboratory. The exceptions to this procedure were samples intended for volatile organic analysis (VOA) which were placed directly into a VOA sample vial. Samples analyzed for major anions were collected in 32 -ounce high density polyethylene bottles and did not require an added preservative. Samples analyzed for major cation parameters were collected in 16 -ounce high density polyethylene bottles and contained an added preservative consisting of 10 milliliters of 20% nitric acid. VOA samples were collected in 40-millilitergl2Lss VOA vials (3 per sampling point) which contained a hydrochloric acid preservative. Samples Golder Associates 3:1061 July 1992 -21- 913-2403 intended for nitate and ammonia analysis were collected in 16 -ounce glass bottles and preserved with 2 milliliters of 50% nitticj ist. Samples intended for dissolved metals analysis were filtered through a 0.45 -micron disposable filter prior to collection in a 16 -ounce high density polyethylene bottle containing 10 milliliters of 20% nitric acid as a preservative, with the exception of a few samples in which the laboratory prepared preservative was added upon receipt by Enseco Rocky Mountain Laboratory. Samples analyzed for pesticides were collected in 1 - liter glass bottles (2 per sampling point) with no preservative. Samples intended for herbicide analysis were collected in 1 -liter glass bottles with no preservative. Samples analyzed for radionuclides were collected in 32 -ounce high density polyethylene bottles (2 per sampling point) and preserved with 10 milliliters of 20% nitric acid. All sample containers were labeled with the sampling location, parameters to be analyzed, date and time sampled, preservative present, and signature of the sampling personnel. Samples were immediately placed in ice -filled coolers after collection and labelling. Table 2-3 presents a summary of containers, filtration and preservatives fcr the parameters analyzed. Sample integrity data sheets which provide sample collection data for each sampling location are presented in Appendix F. Chain of custody forms were completed by the sampling personnel and placed inside the coolers with the appropriate samples. The coolers were sealed with signed chain of custody seals and delivered, via courier, to the laboratory on a daily basis. A field blank sample was collected by pouring laboratory -supplied deionized water through the decontaminated bailer directly into sample collection bottles. This type of sample is generally referred to as an equipment blank or a field blank. The field blank was identified as "EB" during sampling and analysis and is identified as "FB" in the following sections and tables of this report. A laboratory prepared trip blank consisting of 1, 40 -milliliter VOA vial was also provided for analysis and was identified as "TB". Duplicate samples were collected at monitoring well GWMW-5N. Golder Associates • July 1992 -22- 913-2403 For additional QAJQC, laboratory blanks were prepared by Enseco Rocky Mountain Analytical Laboratory. Laboratory blanks consist of a barren solution, usually distilled water or another inert substance, which is prepared by the laboratory and treated as a sample for the parameter being analyzed. This includes all pretreatment, preparation, holding times and the actual analysis. 2.6.2 >$urface Water Sampling Surface water samples were collected from the following three locations: ► The corrugated steel culvert which drains the off -site area at the north property boundary (designated as N -Discharge for sample identification): ► The outlet of the landfill underdrain near the southwestern property boundary (designated as LF-UD for sample identification); and, ► The discharge pipe located at the inlet of the retention pond which is northeast of the residence structure (designated as RP -Inlet for sample identification). The locations of the surface water sampling points are shown on Figure 2-1. Samples taken from the north discharge pipe and the landfill underdrain were collected directly from the pipe outlets. The discharge pipe at the retention pond inlet was submerged at the time of collection. Therefore, the samples were collected within the pond at a point approximately 10 feet downstream from the mouth of the pipe. Care was taken not to incorporate bottom sediments in the samples. All surface water samples were collected in clean plastic bottles and immediately transferred into the appropriate laboratory parameter bottles. Surface water samples were analyzed for the same parameters as were the groundwater samples. Surface water samples were analyzed for total metals (i.e., the samples were not field filtered). Sample preservation, chain of custody, and transport to Enseco Rocky Mountain Analytical Laboratory were accomplished in the same manner as discussed in Section 2.6.1. Sample Golder Associates 9L1.061. July 1992 -23- 913-2403 integrity data sheets for the surface water samples and groundwater samples are provided in Appendix F. Golds, Associate 3:3061 July 1992 -24- 913-2403 3.0 GEOLOGY 3.1 Physiographic and Cieologic Setting The site is located on the rolling upland unit of the Colorado Piedmont section of the Great Plains Physiographic Province as mapped by Crosby (1978). The rolling upland unit consists of broad areas of nearly flat to gently rounded surfaces between major stream valleys. The site lies near the northern margin of the Laramie and Fox Hills geologic units which are part of the hydrologic Denver Basin (Figure 3-1). 3.2 itratjgrapky Based upon data collected during the field investigation, a stratigraphic model has been developed. The three geologic units which have been delineated at the site are: ► The Surficial, Unconsolidated unit; a. The Upper Weathered Bedrock unit; and, ▪ The Lower Weathered Bedrock unit. Based on a literature review the surficial unconsolidated unit is interpreted as Quaternary -aged and the two bedrock units are interpreted as Upper Cretaceous age. A geologic fence diagram illustrating the vertical and lateral distribution of these units is included as Figure 3-2. Golder Associates 931061 July 1992 -25- 913-2403 3.2.1 The Surficial Unconsolidated Ueit The bedrock units at the site are overlain by a yellowish browsto brownish yellow, (ol:an deposit ranging in texture from silty clay to clayey silt. This unit is referred to herein as the Surficial Unconsolidated Unit. This unit is mapped by Colton (1978) as Quaternary Eolium (eolium is a term introduced by Colton to designate wind -deposited silts and sands). The significant clay content of the material as it presently exists is likely the result of in -situ weathering. The unit is no longer continuous across the site due to past landfilling activities. The thickness of the unit at points along the perimeter of the site may be obtained from the fence diagram presented in Figure 3-2. Where present the surficial unconsolidated unit varies in thickness from a few feet to nearly thirty feet. Where present, the Surficial Unconsolidated Unit is quite homogenous vertically as well as laterally, which is typical of a wind -deposited sediment. The unit is well -sorted, also a feature germane to eolian sediments, and is comprised of clay, silt and fine sand. Fine grained materials within the upper consolidated unit were described as varying between silty clay and clayey silt. Laboratory results discussed in Section 5 confirm the variable nature of the fine-grained materials. 3.2.2 The Upper Weathered Bedroc,Unir The unit underlying the Surficial Unconsolidated, Unit at the site is herein designated the Upper Weathered Bedrock. The Upper Weathered Bedrock is an interbedded to interlaminated silty fine sandstone and claystone of Upper Cretaceous age. Lenses of gypsum occur throughout the unit. The color of the material ranges from dark grey to yellowish brown to dark orange. The unit has been weathered to the extent that the material is poorly indurated and little original sedimentary structure remains. The Upper Weathered Bedrock appears to have a high degree of lateral variability with respect to continuity of interbeds and interlaminae. In addition, at some locations one or the other of the materials (silty fine sandstone or claystone) are dominant as shown in the geologic fence diagram (Figure 3-2). The surface of the unit appears to be erosional and reflects the current topography of the site. Figures 3-3A and 3-3B are contour maps of the top of the Upper Weathered Bedrock. Figure 3-3A. is an 11"x17' figure which Golder Associates 9:1061 July 1992 -26- 913-2403 allows for rapid identification of trends across the site. Figure 3-3B is a 2'x3' sheet which allows for more precise identification of elevations at particular locations. Figure 3-4 is a thickness map of the Upper Weathered Bedrock at the site. The thickness of the Upper Weathered Bedrock unit varies from approximately 40 feet to about 70 feet, with the thickest portion present near the southern boundary of the site. The highly variable nature of the Upper Weathered Bedrock is readily explained by the depositional environment of the unit. The Upper Cretaceous units in the vicinity of the Front Range of Colorado have been interpreted as deltaic in origin by Rahmanian, 1975, Weimer, 1973, Briscoe, 1972 and others. The depositional environment of these units may be likened to the present day Mississippi River delta region of Louisiana, where sedimentation patterns are governed by changes in water levels, sediment load and river hydraulics. At the Central Weld site, sandstone lenses or stringers may reflect changes in the position of a channel or an increase in the energy of the local depositional system. Claystone deposits may, for example, indicate the location of an overbank deposit where natural levees were breached during high-water periods. Two large paleochannels, which appear to have been formed on the paleo-surface of the Upper Weathered Bedrock, were noted in the east -west trending trench wall at the northernmost property boundary of the site. The direction of trend of these channels was not determined since only one point of observation was afforded. The paleochannels are comprised of sands and silty sands which are typically coarser -grained than the surrounding material. Based on laboratory analyses of samples from the Upper Weathered Bedrock at the site, as described in Section 5, the fine-grained materials (claystones) have been classified as CL to CH in accordance with the USCS while the coarse -grained materials (sandstones and silty fine sandstones) have been classified as ML to SM (USCS). Golder Associates 9:31061 July 1992 -27- 913-2403 3.2.3 Tbel.ower Weathered Bedrock Unit The deepest unit drilled and sampled at the site is a weathered, grey, interbedded to interlaminated silty fine sandstone and claystone herein designated as the Lower Weathered Bedrock. The Lower Weathered Bedrock is of Upper Cretaceous age. The upper 15 feet of the Lower Weathered Bedrock was cored and sampled. Therefore the following description pertains to that interval. Due to the close similarities in lithologies and sedimentological features, the contact between the Upper Weathered Bedrock and the Lower Weathered Bedrock is herein delineated by a color change from predominantly brownish hues in the overlying Upper Weathered Bedrock to grayish hues in the underlying Lower Weathered Bedrock. However, the typically sharp nature of the contact in conjunction with a zone of bioturbation of the sediments immediately overlying the Lower Weathered Bedrock indicates that the contact is in fact genuinely a geologic one and not simply a weathering front. The silty fine sandstones of the Lower Weathered Bedrock are typically light to medium grey in color; the claystones are generally a medium to dark grey. While the degree of weathering is slightly less than that observed in the Upper Weathered, Bedrock the Lower Weathered Bedrock material is nonetheless poorly indurated and little sedimentary structure remains. The ciaystones are typically completely weathered to a fairly plastic clay. The upper surface of the Lower Weathered Bedrock appears to roughly reflect current natural topography. Figure 3-5 is a contour map of the top of the Lower Weathered Bedrock. Since the base of the unit was not drilled, no thickness map is available. The genesis of this unit is interpreted to be deltaic, based on the similarity to the overlying Upper Weathered Bedrock unit and a review of the literature. Since none of the samples from this unit were retrieved as a soil (i.e. samples were all of rock core) no soil classifications were performed. However, based upon the similarities of the Upper Go'dor Associates 931061 July 1992 -28- 913-2403 Weathered Bedrock and the Lower Weathered Bedrock similar grain -size distributions are expected. Golder Associates 921061 July 1992 -29- 913-2403 4.0 HYDROGEOLOGY In order to characterize the site hydrogeology, it is nernv%ry to develop an understanding of the site stratigraphy, the hydraulic conductivity of the various stratigraphic units, the direction and rate of groundwater flow, the aquifers at the site and groundwater quality. Section 3.2 detailed the site stratigraphy. This section addresses the remaining hydrologic components. 4.1 Results of Previous Investigations Warzyn Engineering, Inc. conducted a hydrogeologic assessment study in 1984 and Industrial Compliance Inc. conducted a groundwater investigation in 1991. The Warzyn Engineering Inc. hydrogeologic investigation dealt with the shallow groundwater zone and presented the following conclusions: ► Direction of groundwater flow is to the south and a southwesterly component exists in the western one-half of the site; ► The hydraulic gradient is approximately 0.03 ft./ft. ► The hydraulic conductivity values for the surficial material, obtained from baildown (rising head) tests were determined to be 3x104 cm/sec for GWMW-1 and 1x104 cm/sec for GWMW-4; and, ► The hydraulic conductivity values for the herein designated Upper Weathered Bedrock for GWMW-2, GWMW-3 and GWMW-5 ranged from 2x104 cm/sec to 2x10; cm/sec. The 1991 Industrial Compliance, Inc. groundwater investigation further defined the shallow groundwater zone and presented the following conclusions: ► The direction of groundwater flow is to the south to southeast; and, ► Groundwater flows along the surficial material/upper bedrock contact. Golder Associates 319616 • • • July 1992 -30- 913-2403 The following sections present the hydrogeologic data obtained during the current investigation. 4.2 Hydraulic Conductivity 4.2.1 In -Situ Hydraulic Conductivity The methodology employed to obtain in -situ hydraulic conductivity values for the stratigraphic units present at the site has been presented in Section 2.5. Table 2-2 summarizes the results of the in -situ hydraulic conductivity. Raw and analytical data are presented in Appendix H. Both the Upper Weathered Bedrock and the Lower Weathered Bedrock were tested. Hydraulic conductivity values for the Upper Weathered Bedrock range from 1.3x10' cm/sec to 8.3x1O cm/sec with a geometric mean value of 9.2x104 cm/sec. Hydraulic conductivity values for the Lower Weathered Bedrock range from 1.1x104 cm/sec to 7.0x1O with a geometric mean of 2.5x10'3 cm/sec. As detailed in Section 3.2, both the Upper Weathered Bedrock and the Lower Weathered Bedrock are comprised of interlayered coarse -grained and fine-grained materials. Bedding in these units is essentially horizontal. The implications of these aspects of the stratigraphy with respect to hydraulic conductivity values are twofold. First, the in -situ hydraulic conductivity values likely reflect the contribution by the coarse -grained layers of the materials. Second, since the layering of the materials is essentially horizontal, the values resulting from in -situ testing may be considered horizontal hydraulic conductivity values. 4.2.2 Laboratory Permeability Testing As presented in Section 5.4 and Table 5-2, the laboratory testing program consisted of evaluating fine-grained and coarse -grained materials separate;y and together. Laboratory permeability test results reflect the vertical permeability of the material. Accordingly, small interbeds of clays can have a pronounced influence on the laboratory permeability results. Laboratory permeability Golder Associates 931961 July 1992 -31- 913-2403 values for the fine-grained materials were 1x10'' cm/sec and 4x104 cm/sec with a geometric mean of 6.3x10-' cm/sec. Laboratory permeability values for the coarse -grained materials were 3x104 cm/sec and 2x10'' cm/sec with a geometric mean of 2.5x10'' cm/sec. One sample containing both fine-grained and coarse -grained materials yielded a permeability value of 2x104 cm/sec. Hydraulic conductivity (permeability) values for the coarse -grained materials obtained by in -situ methods and laboratory testing are generally in agreement with one another. Even though individual fine-grained layers within the weathered bedrock units are not suspected to be continuous across the site, the high frequency of occurrence of fine-grained interlayers and consistent nature of the weathered bedrock units across the site suggests that the effective vertical hydraulic conductivity values for the weathered bedrock units at the site are similar to the laboratory values. 4.3 Horizontal Groundwater Flow Three saturated zones were defined at the site. The first zone is apparently perched and is restricted to the area near the northeast corner of the site. The second zone is approximately coincident with the top of the Upper Weathered Bedrock. The third zone occurs within the upper portion of the Lower Weathered Bedrock and to some extent the lower portion of the Upper Weathered Bedrock. Table 4-1 presents the historical groundwater elevations in the monitoring wells, soil gas probes and trash piezometers. 4.3.1 Upper Weathered_Bedrock The uppermost saturated zone (excluding the perched zone) is generally within the upper portion of the Upper Weathered Bedrock. Figures 4-1A and 4-1B present potentiometric contour maps of the shallow groundwater. Figure 4-1A is an 11'x17" figure which allows for rapid identification of trends across the site. Figure 4-1B is a 2'x3' sheet which allows for more Golder Associates 931961 July 1992 -32- 913-2403 precise identification of elevations at particular locations. Figures 4-1A and 4-1B are based on all available information, including groundwater monitoring wells, soil gas probes, geotechnical borings, trash piezometers installed by Industrial Compliance, diversion trench elevations, approximate elevations of the french drain, and surface topography, Figures 4-1A and 4-1B indicate that the overall direction of groundwater flow in the shallow saturated zone is towards the south. The average horizontal hydraulic gradient is approximately 0.03 ft./ft. Assuming an effective porosity of 30% (Freeze and Cherry, 1979) and a hydraulic conductivity of 9.2x104cm/sec (Section 5.2.1), the average horizontal groundwater flow velocity is calculated to be approximately 95 feet per year. The shallow groundwater is apparently mounded in the east -central portion of the site. The groundwater mound corresponds to a localized high point in the top of Upper Weathered Bedrock (Figures 3-3A and 3-3B). In the northwestern portion of the site, the water levels are relatively high as evidenced by TP-1, TP-2, and P-2 data. Apparently, elevated groundwater levels in this area are caused by water infiltrating through the diversion trench along the northwestern portion of the landfill. The diversion trench in this area is unlined and is not underlain by a french drain system. Furthermore, Figure 3-2 shows that a silty sand unit is present in this area. The silty sand unit may enhance infiltration from the diversion trench. Section 4.3.5 discusses the water levels in this area compared to the base of solid waste. The water level contours near northeastern portion of the site, adjacent to the diversion trench, are based on the elevation of the diversion trench and the approximate elevations of the french drain. Of particular interest are the water levels east of the diversion trench in GWMW-2, SO - 17, SG -18, and SG -19. The water levels in these borings are somewhat higher than would be expected based the data west of the diversion trench and are inferred to represent perched conditions. Based on geologic mapping of the material exposed along the eastern wall of the Golder Associates 931961 July 1992 -33- 913-2403 diversion trench, a claystone unit is present at a relatively shallow depth in this area. Groundwater was observed seeping into the trench from the soil/claystone contact. Evidently, the claystone unit in this area is acting as a barrier to downward migration of water and is resulting in perched conditions east of the trench. The perched water is probably maintained at an artificially high level due to irrigation activities known to occur immediately north and east of the landfill. The irrigation activities likely provide increased recharge to the groundwater east of the trench. According to landfill employees, the water level east of the trench, as observed at the east wall of the trench, rises a few feet during the irrigation season. A similar rise is not observed along the western wall of the trench, since irrigation does not occur on the landfill. 4.3.3 Tower Weathered Bedrock Deep groundwater monitoring wells GWMW-8 through GWMW-l4 were screened within the Lower Weathered Bedrock. Adjacent shallow wells screened within the Upper Weathered Bedrock indicate a saturated zone in the upper portion of the Upper Weathered Bedrock. The deep wells indicate a saturated zone within the upper portion of the Lower Weathered Bedrock. During drilling a relatively dry zone was noted within the Upper Weathered Bedrock. The presence of the dry material suggests that the degree of communication between the shallow and deep saturated zones is minimal. Figure 4-2 is a contour map of the deep groundwater potentiometric surface. Based on information presented in Figure 4-2, the direction of groundwater flow in that zone is towards the south-southeast. The average horizontal groundwater gradient in the lower groundwater zone is approximately 0.02 ft./ft.. Assuming an effective porosity of 30% (Freeze and Cherry, 1979) and a hydraulic conductivity of 2.5x10'5 cm/sec (Section 5.1.1), the average horizontal groundwater flow velocity is calculated to be approximately 2 feet per year. Golder Associates 931961 July 1992 -34- 913-2403 4.4 Vertical Groundwater Flow Seven deep/shallow well pairs exist at the site. At the upgtadient well pairs, downward vertical gradients exist (-0.40 to -0.80). Well pairs near Spotter Lakes exhibit slight downward to upward gradients (-0.11 to +0.01). At the downgradient well pair which is not near Spotter Lakes (GWMW-12 and GWMW-5N) a slight downward gradient exists (-0.014). Table 4-2 is a summary of vertical gradients at the well pain. The slight gradients at the well pairs adjacent to Spotter Lakes may indicate that the lakes are locally recharging groundwater. It should be noted that the vertical gradient may change seasonally. 4.5 I$pth to Groundwater in_Landfilled Areas As mentioned in Section 1.4, seven trash piezometers (TP-1 through TP-7) were installed in 1991 under the supervision of Industrial Compliance Inc. (IC). The purpose of these piezometers was to delineate depths and thicknesses of refuse. IC reported that groundwater was above the base of trash in piezometers TP-1 and TP-6 at heights ranging of 1.92 feet and 0.42 feet, respectively. In addition, IC made recommendations concerning the conceptual design of the groundwater collection/diversion ditch located along the northern and eastern edges of the landfill. The purpose of this ditch was to control groundwater levels below the landfill. As part of the recent field investigation, water levels were measured in all of the trash piezometers in order to evaluate the effectiveness of the groundwater collection/diversion ditch. Table 4-3 summarizes the water levels measured in the trash piezometers with respect to base of solid waste as reported by IC in their 1991 report. Groundwater was present above the base of solid waste at only one location, piezometer TP-1, where groundwater was 6.34 feet above the base of solid waste. As shown on Figure 2-1, TP-1 is located near the northwest corner of the site. In this vicinity, the groundwater collection/diversion ditch is unlined, potentially resulting in local recharge in the area of TP-1. 921061 Golder Associates July 1992 -35- 913-2403 5.0 LABQRATORY $QILS TESTING 5.1 Summary of Laboratory Soils Testinv Laboratory soils testing was conducted at the Golder soils laboratory in Denver, Colorado in accordance with standard ASTM methods in order to characterize the physical and mechanical properties of the geologic materials at the site. Laboratory soils testing included: ► Natural moisture content, ► Particle size analysis, ► Liquid and plastic limits, ► Classification, ► Permeability, and; ► Consolidation. In addition to the testing done at the Golder laboratory, five samples were sent to Analytica Laboratory of Golden, Colorado for soil chemistry analyses for Cation Exchange Capacity (CEC) and pH. Table 5-1 presents a summary of the laboratory soils data. A review of Table 5-1 indicates that the Surficial Unconsolidated Unit as described in Section 3.2.1 generally claccifies as a silty clay to clayey silt, with interbeds of silty sand. The laboratory testing results were used to verify field descriptions made during logging. 31061 Golder Associates July 1992 -36- 913-2403 The Upper Weathered Bedrock, which is described in detail in Section 3.2.2 is a combination of coarse -grained and fine-grained materials. USCS classifications for this unit include CL, ML and SM (clay, silt and silty sand, respectively). The Lower Weathered Bedrock, described in detail in Section 3.2.3, was somewhat more competent than the overlying unit and was sampled using rock coring methods. Therefore soil testing was not conducted on this unit. However, field classifications assigned to this unit were quite similar to those of the overlying unit, suggesting that similar grain -size distributions may be expected. Grain -size curves and compaction test results (where appropriate) for the soil samples tested appear in Appendix G. 5.2 Natural Moisture Content Natural moisture content values were determined for all of the soil samples tested by the soil laboratory. Values for natural moisture content ranged from 6.7 % to 24.6 % with a mean value of 15.8 % and a standard deviation of 4.7 %. Moisture content values were not clustered around any one soil type. Natural moisture content was typically near the plastic limit for the materials classified as CL according to the USCS. 5.3 Specific Gravity Specific gravity values were obtained for 24 samples. Values for specific gravity range from 2.66 to 2.74 with a mean value of 2.69 and a standard deviation of 0.02. Specific gravity is a unit -less value. The narrow range of values and the lack of clustering of these values around a particular geologic unit is likely due to a common source for the redeposited sediments present at the site. Golder Associates .31061 t July 1992 -37- 913-2403 5.4 Permeability A total of eight laboratory permeability tests were performed in order to determine the vertical permeabilities of the geologic materials at the site. Of the eight tests, four were performed on relatively undisturbed, field preserved, core samples from the two weathered bedrock units. The remaining four permeability tests were performed on recompacted, remolded samples. All remolded samples were tested at approximately 95% compaction and 94% to 99% of optimum moisture content. Confining pressures representative of in -situ conditions were used on all samples. Confining pressure calculations were based on sample collection depth and local depth to groundwater. Table 5-2 summarizes the laboratory permeability test results. The approach to permeability testing of the bedrock materials was driven by the interbedded and interlaminated nature of the material. Since fine-grained materials (weathered claystones) are interbedded with coarser, silty fine sandstones and siltstones, and bedding is essentially horizontal, a difference in horizontal permeabilities versus vertical permeabilities was suspected. Therefore, the approach to permeability testing was to isolate the two main types of materials (coarse -grained and fine-grained) for discrete testing and additionally to test the two materials together. Values for permeabilities of the coarse -grained materials were obtained by one test on an undisturbed core sample from the Upper Weathered Bedrock and one undistributed core sample from the Lower Weathered Bedrock. Permeability values for these samples were 3x104 cm/sec and 2x10'5 cm/sec. The permeability values for the coarse -grained materials correlate well with the in -situ hydraulic conductivity values obtained by slug testing. Permeabilities for the fine-grained materials were obtained by one test of undisturbed core sample and four tests of remolded samples. The values obtained for these samples ranged from 3x104 cm/sec for one of the remolded Upper Bedrock samples to 1x104 for the undisturbed Lower Weathered Bedrock sample. Golder Associates 921961 July 1992 -38- 913-2403 A core sample containing both fine-grained and coarse -grained materials was tested in order to obtain a value for permeability of the two units acting together. The resultant value for this sample is 2x104 cm/sec. The relatively low permeability of this sample indicates that the fine- grained materials exert a pronounced influence on vertical permeabilities. Based on data provided by Industrial Compliance, 1991, the base of the landfill apparently rests on Upper Weathered Bedrock. Therefore, the permeability values for the Upper Weathered Bedrock unit have significant implications regarding potential contaminant migration. The permeability of these materials ranged from 3x103 cm/sec to 4x104 cm/sec. These are relatively low permeabilities and suggest that the Upper Weathered Bedrock unit would likely act as a significant bather to downward migration of contaminants. 5.5 Geochemical Charnc dstics Geochemical characteristics of geologic materials at the site were evaluated by Analytica Laboratory of Golden, Colorado for Cation Exchange Capacity (CEC) and pH. The CEC evaluation was performed to assess the contaminant attenuation potential of the Upper Weathered Bedrock and the Surficial Unconsolidated material. The evaluation of pH was performed in order to access the CEC values as they apply to the site, since CEC is strongly dependent upon pH. An additional motivation for pH testing is a cursory aeaeecment of the ability of the soil to act as a buffer to acid Ieachate drainage. 5.5.1 Cation Exchange Capacity The CEC of geologic material is a measure of the ability of that material to adsorb exchangeable cations. It can therefore be used as a measure of the ability to attenuate the migration of some contaminants, primarily inorganic contaminants, by adsorption of exchangeable cations. Clay minerals have, to varying degrees depending on the particular mineralogy, a high capacity to adsorb specific inorganic solutes because of large surface areas and numerous exchange sites. Golder Associates 82106: July 1992 -39- 913-2403 In general certain metals including lead, cadmium, mercury and zinc are particularly susceptible to attenuation. Potassium, ammonia, magnesium, silicon and iron are moderately attenuated. Sodium is weakly attenuated. Divalent cations are generally more readily adsorbed than monovalent cations. Cations are more strongly adsorbed than anions. Conservative solutes such as chloride are not attenuated. CEC is typically reported in terms of milliequivalent per 100 grams of dry mass (meq/100g). In order to evaluate CEC and pH at the site, 5 samples were submitted for testing. Four of the samples were of the Upper Weathered Bedrock and one sample was of the Surficial Unconsolidated silty clay. Upper Weathered Bedrock samples were favored since base of solid waste is estimated to be typically within the Upper Weathered Bedrock unit. Two of the samples were from upgradient soil gas wells (SG -16, SG -20) and three of the samples were from downgradient soil gas wells (SG -3, SG -6 and SG -9). Tabla 5-3 presents the results of the CC and pH analyses. Values for ac range from 18.3 meq/100g to 37.3 meq/100g. Based on these results, the materials at the site have the potential to attenuate the migration of inorganic contaminants. 5.5.2 Soil/Rock pH The same five samples submitted for CEC analysis were also analyzed for pH. The pH of material underlying the site has a direct bearing upon the CC of the material. The laboratory procedure for CEC testing involves neutralizing the material (pH of 7.0). In a low pH environment a greater percentage of Hydrogen ions (II+) are present. These H+ ions limit the exchange sites available and therefore lower the CEC. The pH values reported for the Central Weld site range from 7.5 to 7.9. Since the reported pH values are close to neutral the CEC values reported by laboratory testing should closely mimic those relative to field conditions. The pH of a geologic material is an indicator of the alkalinity of the material which in turn governs the ability of that material to buffer acid leachate. The range of pH values reported (7.5 to 7.9) are just slightly basic. Golder Associates 9310►61 • July 1992 -40- 913-2403 6.0 BFQS.ULTS OF WATER OUALITY ANALYSES Water quality samples were collected at the Central Weld site in March 1992 from eight shallow monitoring wells, seven deep monitoring wells, and three surface water sampling sites. Several quality assurance (QA) samples were also collected: a field duplicate, a field blank, a trip blank, and laboratory blanks. Procedures used to collect the field duplicate, field blank, and trip blank samples are described in Section 2.6. In addition, laboratory blanks were prepared and analyzed by the laboratory during sample analysis. Laboratory blanks were prepared by the laboratory and were analyzed without leaving the laboratory. Laboratory blank samples were analyzed concurrently with field samples to provide an indication of contamination introduced at the laboratory. Analysis of laboratory blanks was sporadic. Several laboratory blanks were analyzed for a particular type of analysis (e.g., volatile organics), while no laboratory blanks were analyzed for other types of analyses (e.g., nutrients). This is typical for laboratory blanks and does not adversely impact the quality of the data. The samples were analyzed by Enseco/Rocky Mountain Analytical Laboratory in Arvada, Colorado. The following parameters were analyzed: ► Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs); ► Pesticides and Herbicides; ► Trace Metals; ► Nutrients; ► Major Anions and Cations; and, ► Radionuclides and Radioactivity. Golder Associates 931061 July 1992 -41- 913-2403 A discussion of the laboratory results is provided below. Laboratory analytical results are included in Appendix I. 6.1 Volatile ()manic Compppnds A total of 34 volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were analyzed in the water quality samples (Table 6-1). Of these, eight VOCs were detected in one or more of the samples. These are: ► Acetone; ► 1,1-Dichloroethane; ► 1,2-Dichloroethane; ► 1,2-Dichloroethee; ► 1,2-Dichioropropane; ► Methylene chloride; ► Trichloroethene; and, ► Tetrachloroethane. The volatile organic compounds that were detected and their concentrations are summarized in Table 6-2. VOCs were detected in five monitoring wells: GWM 2, GWM ( GWItaic ta- GWMW-5N, and GWMW-7. Al of these wells are completed in the shallow aquifer. With the exception of GWMW-2, each of these wells is located downgradient of the landfill. Monitoring well GWMW-2 is located upgradient of the landfill. Figures 4 -IA and 4-1B show the location of the wells and the inferred direction of groundwater flow in the shallow aquifer. :. 0 E. Fdss C'clA2; l L VOCs were;also-detected in one of the surface rvatet'samples,-LF UDjcollected from the outlet of the la dfrll anderdrain. tNo VOCs were detected in the surface water samples collected from Golder Associates 931061 3 yp/73/9Z July 1992 42- 913-2403 the steel culvert which drains the off -site area at the north property boundary (N -Discharge) and the inlet of the retention pond (RP -Inlet). VOCs were not detected in the field blank. Methylene chloride was detected in the trip blank and sample GWMW-7. Two VOCs were detected in the laboratory blanks: acetone, and methylene chloride. Both of these compounds are common laboratory contaminants. Acetone was detected in sample GWMW-2. Based on the laboratory and trip blank results, acetone and methylene chloride are present as a result of laboratory contamination and do not accurately reflect impacts from the landfill. Following is a list of detected volatile organic compounds, the range of concentrations at the site, and their corresponding drinking water standards: Compound Range of Concentration (mg/1) State of Colorado Standard (m8/1) Federal Standard (mg/1) r 1,1-Dichloroethane l,2-Dichloroethane 1,2-Dichloroethene 1, 2-Dichloropropane Trichloroethene Tetrachloroethene <0.005 to 0.0059 <0.005 to 0.018 <0.005 to 0.026 <0.005 to 0.0066 <0.005 to 0.070 <0.005 to 0.210 N/A 0.005'; 0.00042 0.12 0.562 0.005'; 0.0052 0.0052 N/A 0.005' 0.07' 0.005' 0.005' 0.005' Standard shown for 1,2-dichloroethene is representative of cis-1,2-dichloroethene. State Standards 1: Colorado Drinlang Water Standards, CCR Tide 5 2: Colorado Ground Water Standards, CCR Title 5 Federal Stan¢Argls 3: Currently applicable standard promulgated under the Safe Drinking Water Act, 40 CFR 141 4: Safe Drinking Water Act Standard to become effective on July 30, 1992. ooldar Associct•s 931061 July 1992 -42- 913-2403 the steel culvert which drains the off -site area at the north property boundary (N -Discharge) and the inlet of the retention pond (RP -Inlet). VOCs were not detected in the field blank. Methylene chloride was detected in the trip blank and sample GWMW-7. Two VOCs were detected in the laboratory blanks: acetone, and methylene chloride. Both of these compounds are common laboratory contaminants. Acetone was detected in sample GWMW-2. Rawl on the laboratory and trip blank results, acetone and methylene chloride are present as a result of laboratory contamination and do not accurately reflect impacts from the landfill. Following is a list of detected volatile organic compounds, the range of concentrations at the site, and their corresponding drinking water standards: Compound Range of Concentration (mgn) State of Colorado Standard (m8/1) Federal Standard (mg/1) 1,1-Dichloroethane 1,2-Dichloroethane 1,2-Dichloroethene 4 1,2-Dichloropropane Trichloroethane Trietdo ethene da� <0.005 to 0.0059 <0.005 to 0.018 <0.005 to 0.026 <0.005 to 0.0066 <0.005 to 0.070 <0.005 to 0.210 N/A 0.005`; 0.00042 0.12 0.562 0.005'; 0.0052 0.0052 N/A 0.005' 0.07' 0.005' 0.005' 0.005` Itan shown fo r 1,2-dichloroethene is representative of cis-1,2-dichloroethene. State Standards 1: Colorado Drinking Water Standards, CCR Title 5 2: Colorado Ground Water Standards, CCR Title 5 Federal Standards 3: Currently applicable standard promulgated under the Safe Drinking Water Act, 40 CFR 141 4: Safe Drinking Water Act Standard to become effective on July 30, 1992. • ,,o5 .o s� ui6 Golder Associates 43106. • • July 1992 -43- 913-2403 Based on the information presented above, the maximum detected concentration of 1,2- dichloroethane,1,2-dichloropropane, trichloroethene, and tetrachloroethene exceeds eithera State of Colorado or federal standards. The maximum concentration of each of these compounds was exhibited by shallow groundwater on the downgndient site of the landfill in monitoring wells MW -4, MW -5, or MW -5N (Table 6-1). All detected concentrations of 1,2-dichloroethene are below State and federal standards. No standards have been established for 1,1-dichloroethane. 6.2 Pesticides and Herbicides The water quality samples were analyzed for four pesticides (Endrin, Lindane, Methoxychlor, and Toxaphene) and two herbicides (2,4-D and 2,4,5-TP (Silvex)). No pesticides or herbicides were detected in any of the water quality samples analyzed. 6.3 Trace Meals Ten trace metals were analyzed in the water quality samples: arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, iron, lead, manganese, mercury, selenium and silver. Of these, five trace metals (barium, cadmium, chromium, iron and manganese) were detected in one or more of the samples. The detected concentrations for these trace metals are summarized in Table 6-3. The following paragraphs discuss the five detected trace metals. Barium, iron, and/or manganese were detected in seven of the nine shallow monitoring wells and i to each of the deep monitoring wells and surface water samples Ca mrum and-chfoiitium were -' only detected. in one sample, -which was collected from' deep_ monitoring well G2. This appears to be an isolated occurrence. No trace metals were detected in the field blank or in the laboratory blank analyzed for this set of samples. As is typical, the trip blank sample was not analyzed for metals. Golder Associates 931061 ImmissmismilimanmI July 1992 -44- 913-2403 Barium concentrations ranged from <0.010 to 0.043 mg/1. There was no significant difference between the concentration of barium in the shallow and deep monitoring wells or between upgradient and downgradient sampling sites. This suggests that barium detected in the samples is originating from natural, geologic sources. The detected barium concentrations were all below the current primary drinking water standard of 1.0 mg/I established by the EPA and the State of Colorado. Iron concentrations ranged from <0.10 to 0.87 mg/1. The secondary standard for iron established by the EPA and State of Colorado is 0.3 mg/I. Iron was only detected in the deep monitoring wells and the surface water samples. The presence of iron in the deep monitoring wells but not the shallow monitoring wells suggests that groundwater in the deeper aquifer is chemically under reducing (anaerobic) conditions whereas groundwater the shallow aquifer is under oxidizing (aerobic) conditions. Iron is nearly insoluble in waters that are oxygenated and not acidic but can be quite soluble in near neutral or basic waters that are void of oxygen. Field water quality measurements indicated that groundwater from both the shallow and deep aquifers at the site is, in fact, near neutral or basic. The presence of iron in site surface waters, expected to be well aerated and therefore insoluble to iron, is probably explained from particulates entrained in the samples during collection. Surface water samples for trace metals were not filtered when collected which could explain the source of particulate matter in the samples. Any iron in the particulates would have become dissolved into the water during sample preservation. Manganese concentrations ranged from <0.010 to 1.7 mg/1. The secondary standard for manganese established by the EPA and State of Colorado is 0.05 mg/1. Manganese was detected in the surface water samples, the shallow monitoring wells, and the deep monitoring wells. Concentrations of manganese were generally higher in the deep monitoring wells. In fact, the maximum detected concentration of manganese was exhibited by deep monitoring well GWMW- 8, located on the upgradient side of the landfill. Geochemically, manganese behaves very similar to iron. This probably explains the difference in manganese concentrations between the deep and shallow aquifers. -kJ ...e4 C.o v+' o ..+ 0 ,n eow:,.,.A CIA) MW—i.?. Golder Associates 92106- July 1992 .a5- 913-2403 6.4 Nutrients Two common nutrients, nitrate and ammonia, were analyzed in the water quality samples. Nutrient concentrations are summarized in Table 6-4. Ammonia was detected in six of the seven deep monitoring wells but in none of the shallow monitoring wells or surface water samples. Ammonia is a common groundwater constituent in areas of agricultural activity. Ammonia is chemically unstable in water under oxidizing conditions common in surface waters and shallow aquifers. This may explain why it was not detected either in the site surface waters or in the shallow aquifer. The presence of ammonia in groundwater from the deeper aquifer suggests that this aquifer is under reducing conditions and may be impacted by agricultural activities upgradient of the landfill. There is currently no EPA or State of Colorado standard for ammonia. Nitrate was detected in all but one of the samples and ranged in concentration from 0.11 to 18.5 mg/I as N. Two samples (GWMW-2 and N -Discharge) exceeded the EPA and State of Colorado drinking water standard for nitrate of 10 mg/I as N. Monitoring well GWMW-2 is completed upgradient of the landfill in the shallow aquifer and surface water sampling site N -discharge is located along the northern landfill boundary adjacent to agricultural land. Nitrate levels were consistently higher in the shallow monitoring wells and surface water samples than the deep monitoring wells, suggesting that nitrate is originating from agricultural activities near the landfill. This interpretation is consistent with the finding of Industrial Compliance, Inc. (1991). Neither nitrate nor ammonia were detected in the field blank. The trip blank was not analyzed for nitrate or ammonia. 6.5 Major Anions andSations The following major anions and cations were analyzed in the water quality samples: calcium, magnesium, potassium, sodium, alkalinity (bicarbonate and carbonate), chloride, and sulfate. Golder Associates 32,1061 July 1992 46- 913-2403 The results of these analyses are presented on a trilinear diagram on Figure 6-1. Sample concentrations are designated on the diagram as a percentage of the total cation and anion concentrations measured in each sample. Note that the samples have been divided into three general groups based on their source: surface water, shallow monitoring wells and, deep monitoring wells. The position of the samples on the trilinear diagram indicates that all of the samples have a similar chemical signature and probably cannot be distinguished based on their major anion and cation data alone. Based on the predominant cation and anion measured, the samples classify as either calcium -sulfate or magnesium -sulfate waters. Most of the samples exceeded the secondary drinking water standard for sulfate of 250 mg/1. 6.6 Radionuclides and Radioactivity Two radionuclides (Radium 226 and 228) and two measures of radioactivity (Gross Alpha and Gross Beta) were analyzed in each of the water quality samples. The results of these analyses are summarized in Table 6.5. Two samples exceeded the EPA and State of Colorado drinking water standard for combined Radium 226 and 228 of 5 pCi/I. Both samples were collected upgradient of the landfill, one from shallow monitoring well GWMW-3 and the other from deep monitoring well GWMW-10. Combined Radium 226/228 activities for the other samples ranged from 0.3 to 4.9 pCi/1 and avenged 2.0 pCi/I. There was no significant difference between the activities of groundwater samples upgradient and downgradient of the landfill, suggesting that the landfill does not act as a source of radioactivity. Fifteen of the eighteen groundwater and surface water samples exceeded the EPA and State of Colorado drinking water standard for Gross Alpha activity of 15 pCi/I. Gross Alpha activities ranged from 11 to 180 pCi/1 and averaged 49.3 pCi/1. The highest activities were measured in Golder Atuoclates 921061 July 1992 -47- 913-2403 the shallow monitoring wells. It should be noted that there was no significant difference between the activities of groundwater samples upgradient and downgradient of the landfill, suggesting that the landfill does not act as a source of radioactivity. Gross Beta activities ranged from 0.0 to 71 pCi/1 and averaged 33.8 pCi/l. Similar to the Gross Alpha results, Gross Beta activities were generally higher in the shallow monitoring wells than the deep monitoring wells with no significant difference between upgradient and downgradient wells. A standard for Gross Beta. has not been established by the EPA or State of Colorado. The source of radionuclides and radioactivity in the samples appears to be natural and is probably related to native geologic materials occurring beneath the site. Overall, there was no significant difference between sample activities upgradient and downgradient of the landfill. Low activities of Gross Alpha (0.8 pCi/1) and Gross Beta (1.6 pCi/1) were detected in the field blank. The trip blank was not analyzed for radionuclides or radioactivity. No laboratory blanks were analyzed for radionuclides or radioactivity. Golder Associates • • • July 1992 -48- 913-2403 7.0 VALIDATION OF ANALYTIC T. DATA The analytical data reported by Enseco/Rocky Moun..ain Analytical Laboratory were validated by Golder to determine the quality of the results. TI following items were evaluated as part of the laboratory data validation: . Sample. Preservation and Holding Times; Instrument Calibration and Tuning; • Blank Sample Results; • Surrogate Recoveries; • Control Sample Recoveries; and. . Field Duplicates. The results of this evaluation are discussed below. 7.1 tic Preserva,tipn andeioldinr Time' Preservation and holding time requirements were satisfied for all samples submitted to the laboratory with the following exceptions: ► Herbicide samples from five monitoring wells, two surface water sites, and the equipment blank were not analyzed within the required holding times. As per WMC instruction, the seven field sites and an equipment blank were resampled for herbicides on April 27 and 28, 1991. The second set of herbicide samples collected was analyzed within holding times limits; . Duplicate VOX samples from monitoring well GWMW-5N we= analyzed outside holding time limits. A comparison of the laboratory results indicated a problem with the preparation of one of the samples. The laboratory thaefore reanalyzed the samples and presented these results in its final report. The reanalysis of the VOC duplicates was performed sixteen days past the holding time limit. The analytical laboratory believes that analysis of these samples past the holding time limit has not significantly affected the results. Gotder Associates • July 1992 -49- 913-2403 ► Holding times for nitrate were acceded for samples GWMW-5, GWMW-9 and GWMW-12 by approximately one day. The holding time limit for nitrate in water samples is 48 hours; and, ► Metals samples from monitoring wells GWMW-5, GWMW-9 and GWMW-12 were not preserved in the field due to insufficient pre ervative provided by the laboratory. Preservative was added to these samples when received at the laboratory. 7.2 Instrument f'ilibration and Tnninv Calibration of laboratory analytical equipment is viral in ensuring that the instt:meats are capable of producing acceptable quantitative data. Tuning further ensures acceptable instrument sensitivity. Laboratory reports provided by Fnseco/Rocky Mountain Analytical were reviewed to verify that the results of instrument calibration and tuning were acceptable. As indicated by the laboratory, all calibration and tuning results were acceptable for the samples analyzed for this project. 7.3 plank Samale Results Blanks are used to detect sample contamination introduced from the following possible sources: (1) Background compound concentrations in the air at the sampling sites; (2) Unclean sampling equipment; (3) Unclean sample containers; (4) Unclean laboratory instruments; and, (5) Background compound concentrations in the air at the laboratory. Field, trip and laboratory blanks were analyzed for this project. A field blank was prepared in the field by passing laboratory -grade deionized water through decontaminated sampling Golder Associates .7,31.961 s • • July 1992 -50- 913.2403 equipment and collecting the water in sample container. Analysis of the field blank will potentially detect contamination from each of the five sources listed above. Methylene chloride, gross alpha. and gross beta were detected at low concentrations in the filed blank sample. One trip blank was prepared in the laboratory by filling VOC containers with deionized water at approximately the same time and location that the sample containers used for sampling were prepared. These containen remained with the sample bottles while in transit to the site, during sampling, and during the return trip to the laboratory. At no time during these procedures were the containers opened. Analysis of the trip blank will potentially detect contamination from sources (3) through (5) listed above. VOCs were not detected in the trip blank sample. laboratory blanks were prepared in the laboratory during the period that the field samples were being analyzed. Analyses of the laboratory blanks will potentially detect contamination from sources (4) and (5) listed above. Two VOCs were detected in the laboratory blank samples: acetone and methylene chloride. Each of these compounds is a common laboratory contaminant. No herbicides, pesticides or metals were detected in any of the blank samples. 7.4 Surer= Rrrnvrrir. Surrogate compounds are added to field samples prior to analysis in the laboratory to identify potential sample matrix interferences and to evaluate the accuracy of the analytical results. Known concentrations of these compounds are used and their recoveries are measured during sample analysis. If the recovery of the surrogates falls significantly outside of established limits for the laboratory method, the accuracy of the sample results could be in question. Golder Associates 931061 July 1992 -51- 913-2403 Samples for VOCs, herbicides and pesticides were spiked with surrogate compounds. All surrogate recoveries were within limits indicating that there were no agnificant matrix interference problems and the analytical results are relatively accurate. 7.5 Control Sytlplc Recoveries Analysis of control samples provides an additional measure of the accuracy of the sample results. Unlike surrogates, however, the compounds used to spike control samples are identical to those being analyzed in the field samples. Known concentrations of these target compounds are added to laboratory -prepared solutions and sample splits arc generally tales. Analysis of control sample splits provides an additional measure of the precision of the laboratory method being used. Recoveries of compounds added to the control samples should fail within limits established by the laboratory method. The relative percent difference (RPD) between the control sample duplicate results should also not exceed established levels. Control samples were analyzed for VOCs, herbicides, pesticides, metals, major anions and ations, and nutrients. Recoveries and RPDs for all of the control samples were within or slightly outside of established limits. 7.6 Field Dunik nrs Field duplicate samples are collected and analyzed as an indication of the combined precision of the field sampling procedure and the laboratory analyses. The relative percent difference (RPD) between duplicate sample results is calculated and used to quantify the degree of sample precision. Low RPDs indicate a high level of precision and high RPDs poor precision. RPD values are generally not calculated when the compound concentration for one or both of the duplicate samples is below the detection limit. Ooldr+r Assoc joist 921061 • July 1992 -52- 913-2403 Dupliate samples were collected for this project from monitoring well CWMW-5N. A comparison of the duplicate sample results indicated, overall, an acceptable level of sample precision. The highest RPD values (37 and 43%) were reported for the radioactivity and radionuclide analyses. According to the laboratory, precision for these parameters is generally not high due to the analytical methods used. RPDs for the other parameters analyzed ranged from 0 to 13%, indicating a good to high level of precision. • Golder Associate • 971061 • July 1992 -53- 913-2403 8.0 STJW� CONCLUSIONS This 'Hydrogeologic and Geotechnical Characterization Report was prepared to provide Waste Services Corporation (WSC) with a comprehensive evaluation of the geology, hydrogeology, and geochemical conditions at the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. The information presented in this report will be the basis for developing environmental monitoring systems for groundwater. surface water, and landfill gas. The remainder of this section presents summaries and conclusions regarding site conditions. 8.1 fieoloPY Three geologic units have been identified at the site. They are herein referred to as the Surficial Unconsolidated Unit, the Upper Weathered Bedrock and the Lower Weathered Bedrock. I The Surficial Unconsolidated Unit is an eolian silty clay to clayey silt which ranges in thickness from a few feet to nearly 30 feet. The Surficial Unconsolidated Unit exhibits considerable lateral and vertical homogeneity. The Upper Weathered Bedrock is comprised of interlaminated and interbedded silty fine sandstone and claystone. The unit is typically yellow dsh brown, is poorly indurated and varies laterally across the site. The thickness of the unit ranges from approximately 40 to 70 feet. The Lower Weathered Bedrock is comprised of interlaminated and interbedded, medium to dark grey, silty fine sandstone and claystone. The unit is slightly less weathered than the Upper Weathered Bedrock. Thickness of the Lower Weathered Bedrock was not determined as part of this study. OotdsM *nods, • 19 :1;1961 • • • July 1992 -54- 913-2403 8.2 Hvdroteoloev Three saturated zones, a perched zone, a shallow groundwater zone, and a deep groundwater zone, were encountered in this study. Each is discussed below. Perched Zone A perched zone is inferred to exist east of the diversion trench along the northeastern perimeter of the site. The perched zone rests on top of a claystone unit and receives recharge from irrigation. The irrigation results in seasonal water level rises of a few feet in the perched water. Irrigation does not occur on the landfill. Therefore, perched waters are not evident within the landfilled areas. Shallow Saturated Zone The shallow saturated zone occurs near the top of the Upper Weathered Bedrock. Direction of flow in the shallow saturated zone is to the south-southwest The average horizontal gradient across the site is approximately 0.03 ft/ft.. Avenge horizontal groundwater flow velocity is approximately 95 feet per year. In one localized area, the shallow saturated zone extends above the base of the landfill. This is evidently the result of infiltration through the diversion trench which extends along the northern boundary of the landfill. The saturated refuse may be an avenue for contaminant migration into the shallow groundwater system. Deep Saturated Zone The deep saturated zone occurs within the lower portion of the Upper Weathered Bedrock and the upper portion of the Lower Weathered Bedrock. Direction of flow is to the south-southeast. Colder Assoolates ,bats' • July 1992 -55- 913-24(3 The avenge horizontal gradient across the site is approximately 0.02 ft./ft.. Avenge horizonal groundwater flow velocity is approximately 11 feet per year. During drilling, a relatively dry zone approximately 5 to 10 feet thick was generally noted between the shallow groundwater and the deep groundwater. The presence of the dry zone suggests that the degree of communication between the shallow and deep groundwater systems is minimal. Vertical Groundwater Flow Downward vertical gradients exist at the shallow/deep well pairs across the site except near Spomer Lakes where weak downward to slightly upward gradients have been calculated. Apparently the lakes are locally contributing a constant head recharge to the groundwater. 8.3 Water Quality • Water quality samples were collected from all of the groundwater monitoring wells and from three surface water sampling points. The following parameters were analyzed: • Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC); • Pesticides and Herbicides; • Trace Metals; • Nutrients; • Major Anions and Cations;and, • Radionuclides and Radioactivity. Volatile organic compounds were decocted in four downgradient shallow groundwater monitoring wells (GWMW-a, GWMW-5, GWMWSN and GWMW-7), upgradient monitoring well GWMW-2, and in the surface water sample from the landfill underdrain (LF-UD). The only VOC detected in GWMW.2 was acetone, which is presented as a result of laboratory Golder AnoobM • • alp July 1992 -56- 913-2403 contamination. The maximum concentration of volatile organic compounds in the downgndient monitoring wells generally exceed EPA or State of Colorado standards. VOCs were not detected in any deep wells. No pesticides or herbicides were detected in any of the water quality samples analyzed. Four trace metals (barium, cadmium, iron and manganese) were detected in one or more of the samples. In general, no trend was observed for occurrence of metals with respect to shallow versus deep wells or upgndient versus downgradient wells. The presence of iron in the deep monitoring wells but not the shallow monitoring wells suggests that water in the deeper saturated zone is chemically under reducing (anaerobic) conditions whereas water in the shallow saturated zone is under oxidizing (aerobic) conditions. Ammonia was detected in six of the seven deep wells but none of the shallow wells. The presence of ammonia in the deep wells is another indication of anaerobic conditions in the deep saturated zone and suggests that a source of ammonia exists upgndient of the landfill. Nitrate was detected in all but one of the water quality samples. The detection of nitrate in upgradient as well as downgradient wells suggests an agricultural source. The water quality samples classify as calcium -sulfate to magnesium -sulfate based on the analysis of major anions and cations. Fifteen of the eighteen groundwater samples exceed the EPA and State of Colorado drinking water standard for Gross Alpha activity. Two samples exceed the EPA and State of Colorado drinking water standard for combined Radium 226 and 228. The source of radionuclides and radioactivity appears to be natural and related to geologic mateiais occurring beneath the site. Golder Associates 931961 July 1992 913-2403 The water quality results discussed above suggest that the landfill has contributed volatile organic compounds to the shallow saeurated zone and the landfill underdrain. Concentrations exhibited by an off -site (approximately 15 feet from the landfill boundary), downgrading, shallow monitoring well (GWMW-5) suggest that volatile organic compounds have migrated off -site. Based on other analytical data collected as part of this study, the landfill does not appear to be a significant source of metals, pesticides, herbicides, nutrients, major anion and cations, or radionuclides. The deeper groundwater system has apparently not been adversely impacted by the landfill operations but has evidently been impacted by upgradient activities. Upgradient groundwater sample results for nitrate, sulfate, radionuclides. and radioactivity indicate that the shallow groundwater near the landfill does not meet drinking water standards due to naturally occurring conditions or upgmdient impacts. However, two downgradient water wells axe permitted by the State of Colorado to withdraw shallow groundwater for domestic or stock use, These two wells represent potential receptor points for volatile organic compound migration via shallow groundwater. The following section presents recommendations for upgrades to site operations and additional investigative activities based on the data presented ut this report. Golder Associates • • • 7uly 1992 -53- 913-2403 9.0 RECOMMENDATIONS Eased on the information presented in this report, the following recommendations are made to upgrade the site operations and to further define the site hydrogeologic l and geochemical conditions: ▪ The design of the unlined portion of the diversion trench located along the northern boundary of the site should be revised to prevent continued recharge to the shallow aquifer system. • The extent of off -site volatile organic compound migration south of the landfill should be delineated. • The current use of the downgradient water wells south of the landfill should be determined through interviews with well owners. Surface water in Spomer Lakes should be sampled to determine if discharge from the landfill underdrain is measurably impacting the lakes. • Shallow monitoring wets along the southern portion of the landfill should be resampled to provide a larger database and to confirm the results of the Golder investigation, ▪ The potential impacts from upgradient irrigation activities should be defined through quarterly ruling of all monitoring wells. ▪ Seasonal water level changes should be determined through quarterly monitoring of water levels in all monitoring wells and soil gas probes. • The extent of saturated infuse in the northern portion of the landfill should be determined through installation of additional piezometers. Golder Associates 921061 • • • July 1992 -59- 913-24O3 10.0 REFERFNCFS Algermissen, S.S., B.L. Bender, S.L. Hanson, D.M. Perkins, and P.C. Thenhaus, 1982, Probahatisrir Estimates of Maximum Acceleration and Velocity in Rock in the Contigious United Stares. Open-fde Report 82-1033. Amuedo and Ivey, 1975, Coal Mine Subsidence and land used in the Boulder -Weld Coalfield Boulder and Weld Counties, Colorado. Colorado Geologial Survey Publication, Environmental Geology. Briscoe, Harty J. Jr., 1973, Sttatigraphy of the Fox Hills Sandstone with some comments on it's Suitability as an Aquifer, Greeley Area, Weld County Colorado. Master's Thesis, Colorado School of Mines. Colton, Roger B., 1978, Geologic Map of the Boulder Fort Collins, Greeley area, Colorado, USGS Miscellaneous Investigation Series MAP I -855.O. Crosby, E.S.. 1978, Landforms in the Boulder -Ft. Collins. Greeley Area, Front Range Urban Corridor, Colorado, U.S. Geologic Survey Map, I -855-H. Federal Emergency Management Agency, 1982, Map# 080266-0750C. Freeze, R.A. and Cherry J.A., 1979, Groundwater. Golder Associates Inc., 1992, Hydrogeologic and Geotcchnical Chan re: ixation Work Plan for the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, Weld County, Colorado. Hansen, W.R., John Chronic, John Matelock, 1978, Climatography of the Front Rance Urban Corridor and Vicinity, Colorado, U.S. Geologic Survey Professional Paper 1019, p. 59. Hvorslev, M.J., 1951, Trine Lag and Soil Permeability in Groundwater Observations. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experimental Station Bulletin 36, Vicksburg, Mississippi. Industrial Compliance, Inc., 1991, Groundwater Investigation - Waste Services Corporation, Central Weld Sanitary i, andfill. Kirkam, R.M. and W.F. Rogers, 1981, Earthquake Potential in Colorado, A Preliminary Evaluation, Colorado Geological Survey, Department of Natural Resources, Denver, Colorado, Bulletin 43. Oolaw Associates 921061 July 1992 -60- 913-2403 Rahmaninan, Victor D., 1975, Deltaic Sedimentation and Structures of the Fox Rills and Laramie Formations, Upper Cretaceous, Southeast of Boulder, Colorado. Master's Thesis, Colorado School of Mines. Robson, S.G., 1987, Bedrock Aquifers in the Denver Basin, Colorado - A quantitative water - resources appraisal. U.S.G.S. Professional Paper 1257, U.S. Department of Transportation -Federal Aviation Administration, 1992, verbal communication. Warzyn Engineering Inc., 1984, Hydrogeologic Assessment, Greeley Landfill, Weld County, Colorado. Weimer, Robert J., 1975, A Guide to the Uppermost Cretaceous Stratigrap'.y, Central Front Range, Colorado: Deltaic Sedimentation, Growth Faulting and Early latamide Crustal Movement. The Mountain Geologist Vol. 10, No. 1 pp. 53.97. Golds Associates 931061 • TABLE 1-1 CENTRAL WELD COUNTY CENSUS. 1980-1990 Location.. Johnstown Milliken Mead Greeley Total Net Unincorporated Johnstown- jMilliken Div. NOTE: • July 1992 • 1535 1506 356 3397 799E 1579 1605 456 %CHG • 2.87 + 6.57 + 28.09 trIA 3776 • 11.18 3628 3396 -8.39 7025 7172 • 2.09 The Johnstown -Milliken Oivislon includes Johnstown, Milliken, Mead, and in 1990 part of Greeley. Net unincorporated area figures are calculated by subtracting incorporated areas included in the division from the division total. Source: US Depanment or Commerce, Census Bureau. Golder Aasoelotns 913-2403 • TABLE 1-2 PERMITTED WELLS WITHIN ONE MILE OF THE CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL REGISTERED g !7OWNER = P WEL!„OEPTH i•,-- ortt, a WATER LEVEL' Ei ..5-..,. .: e1M1tF ... 0159091 Meter Farms Greekry, Colorado NA NA 0 0765 Robert Race Parker, Colorado 263 NA 0 #11090 GA & MJ Sltable Musket', Colorado 37 8 S 090580 H Daniels Denver, Colorado 22 9 D • Notes NA - On not available Usage Codes 0 - Domestic S + Stock Source: Colorado State Engineer, Division of Water Resources July 1992 913-2403 Golder Woo Igen 931061 • • • SOIL GAS PROBE, MONITORING WELL TABLE 2-1 AN0 OEOTEONNICAL TmdpYG`2,,OrauodSwt4a.{¢ � �P BORINGS `eo:ttt714'41 SUMMARY krvn^bo.+dirreMeiw-.i^.^,. Fz, Yv,tautkrMTw:r._,,,,,,_ .-.;^t21w 1Nonalnti- +.a}AE�YMq-'—.x pPBYetair' tEYwINt Op...... 80-1 372,74447 2,191,475.35 4,816.73 I 4,615.40 6.0 - 280 4,609.4 -4,789.4 SG -2 372,240.24 2.141.476.41 4.794.90 4,793,87 60 - 266 4,787.6 -4,767.8 S0-3 371,750,47 2,141,47,.80 4,77313 4,770.87 8.0 - 14.0 4,764.8 -4,756.61 SC --4 371,39133 2,191,77156 4,767.55 4,785.15 1 6.0 - 14.0 4,760.1 -4.752.1 SO -s 371,013.36 2192128.05 4,761.72 4.759.73 ", 2.0 - 60 4.757,7 •4.151.7 SO -6 370,655.26 2.192,423,07 4,75837 4,755.04 6.0 - 17.0 4.749.1 _4,7361 SG -7 370,680.4 2/924,65) 4,78200 4,780.25 ! 6.0 - 36^0 4374,2 -4,74.2 SO -8 70,87260 2,193,414,15 4,79112 4,741.90 i 8.0 - 320 4,765.4 -4,5544 SG -9 370,688.01 2,193,867.48 4,760.55 i 4,754.27 6.0 - 31.0 4,75.'12 -4,728..r SO -10 371,168.36 2,197,897.75 4,793.36 ! 4.79220 6.0 - 46.0 4,7862 -4,74621 SG -111 -- -- -- _ — SG -12 371,952.67 2,194,040.82 4,79643 1 4.796.98 j 6.0 - 31.0 14391.0 -4,766.0 60-13 371,945.58 2193,544.40 4,806.59 1 4805.63 1 60 - 31.0 4,799.6 -4,7716 SG -14 371,506.76 2.193.61696 4.804,06 4,66104 6.0 - 36.0 4,797.0 -4,767.01 SO -15 371,328.62 2,193,908.24 4,794.83 4,793.26 6.0 - 31.0 4,787.2 -4.762.2 -1r SG -16 35:,94!.14 2,142,482.09 4,820.28 i 4,818.76 6.0 - 36.6 —=1,111r.4,71 SG -17 372,272.54 2.192.769.98 4.623.45 4821.85 6.0 - 36 4,615.84,765.8 SG -1a 372,66259 2,192,76601 4629.20 4,62736 60 - 360 4. 1.5 -1 1.5 SO -10 373,248.01 2,19277174 4837.58 ' 4.815.94 6.0 - 360 4,6362 4.400.21 SO -20 373,239.68 2.192.267.81 4,826.79 ", 4827,16 ", 60 - 31.0 4,821.1 -4,7 .1 S0-21 373,235.37 2,191,525.07 4,831.20 I 4,829.81 6.0 - 21.0 4,823.6 -4,606.0 Monao7/ng Wells GWMW-5N 370,886.28 2.193,894 44 4,761.92 4,759.49 20.0 - 310 4.739.5 -4.729.5 4161.3 -47/A1,3 GWMW-06 371,879.09 1 2,191474,31 1772.90 4,770.29 9.0 - 24.O GWMw-07 371,149.74 j 2,192,062.65 4.764.09 4.781.41 13,0 - 23.0 4,7464 -4,7364 Gwuw_Os 373,232.05 i 2,191,49614 4,87348 4,831.74 70.0 - 60.0 4,761.7 -4,751.7 GWMw-09 373,248.78 l 2,192,751.58 4,838.37 4,336.22 65.0 - 75.0 A.771.2 -4.761.2 17637 -4,7517" 4.7013 -1694.3 GWMW-10 371.940.04 2,193,274.38 4)31609 4,813.70 50.0 - 660 GWMw-1, 370,657.79 2,102,380.76 4,756.62 4,754.31 50.0 - 80.0 'ZWMW-12 370.689.66 L 2.193.901,48 4.761,93 4,759.40 58.0 - 660 i 4,701.4 -4,6914 GWMW-,3 371,66695 2.191477.41, 4. .772.' 1 4769.99 500 - 60.0 4,7260 -4.710.0 GWMW-I4 371,140.54 l 2192067.6:' 4,763.70 4,761,24 50.0 - 80.0 4,7112 -4,701.2 GeondxNra/ea4vr OT -1 371^31239 2.193.153.00 — I 4,612.53 N/A N/A OT -2 371,490,99 2193.15604 — 1 4,814.27 WA WA GT-7 371,71150 2,143,140.78 — 4,821.19 N/A WA 01-4. 373,126.00 2,197,663.00 — 4,815.00 ! WA WA OT -54 373.040.00 2.192.663.00 4,61100 WA WA OT -64 372,92600 2,192,66100 — 4,831.00 N/A I N/A GT-7 I 371,834.40 2,191184.89 -- 4.745,41 WA i N/A NOTES_ 1 Sup Plane Coordinate Swum 2 Slolid obi lm6Ml 3 30.11 was not Inaalld 4 Slate plans uo0rdtnate and Sendai eurvw data for GT-4, G7'-5, and GT-6 ate not avallacle. Values are estimated. July 1992 Golder Associates 913-2403 931061 • • • tO O N co N (0 7. M • 3 a N W 7 cn W Ni ml 74 a R 4 C, c CO of Ptpp Ntti a N to m0 NN O Ua 3 O f P 0 W N nP W W 1 3 a Iy S f:::�`.'- I- O(a P N P I 0 I Ni I 0I e i 2 0 N SAMPLE NUMBER C, a, x co e N eI 0 0 O in I on 0 Pi n:i m I d'I c L `d N o q O �IJ GIG d) dl d L III E E E ail ml 1 O N yl y J EI m 01 (0 on P O 0C a C a Go4der AuocIafes �i I 0 n 0 N el P 931061 • • • TABLE 2-2 SUMMARY OF IN -SITU PERMEABILITY TPSIING WELD COUNTY LANDFILL Geologic Material Tcsled Shallow Wells — Upper Weathered Bedrock c zz y t r.4 3c r y �� n in Sandy SILT and Silty CLAY .F .1 rac Sandy SILT and Silty SAND Sandy SILT and Silty SAND a in in at SAND S ' q •� Lt 0` , 6'$ 0 goU G 2 b w r a 3"3'p ^ C •5 % %.$ p r r o r r o r r b r n o r d o r r b N In b IS w n h cr C s ≥ w s 0 v • n - 00 f a O v r a es: 00 -V 4 0' v w m f 4748.754739.85 r^ v '0 H r Y Z Y a r M r le — f F b r r 4. m Y q d r Y C •...c H r H n b H r = a N 7 n r i '° oOo f d 2 O g j O It d = by —01 0 - GWMW -2 GWMW - 3 0 — I GWMW-5 ,z o �J GWMW-6 r 0 Gower Associates r O 00 931061 • • • TABLE 2-2 SUMMARY OR IN -SITU PERMEABILITY TESTING WELD COUNTY LANDFILL, x mF Gi Deep Wells — Lower Weathered Bedrock =� :,:g Q y Sdry SANDSTONE z a w 0 h z Go H S itty SANDSTONE Silty I SANDSTONE Q7 . Z y y Geometric Mean of Hydraulic Conductivities a PC N N Hydraulic Conductivity (cm/sec) 'e) N ^ O of a • O M N r O M O — O M 0 r O y in — b N 0 N a tV) C Elevation (ft) r -' N• N_ 1'• AP 4771.224761.22 Or n to r N '0 r f 4764.31-4694.31 ♦ i O r ♦ 0 N 0 a N Y (11 r; T r _— N Y gig O c) 0 0 g 0 g 0 g 0 g 0 g ..Well Number of is C) a 3 C 0 3 O V ;. C r ; U - i 0 Odder Asaoolatns Hydraulic conductivity valuea were calculated using the Hvorslev (1951) 0 931061 • • • TABLE 2-3 SAMPLE CONTAINERS, PRESERVATION AND FILTRATION PARAMETER SAMPLE CONTAINER - SAMPLE PRESERVATION SAMPLE FILTRATION Major Anions 1-32 ounce. plastic None No Major Cations 1-16 ounce, plastic ENO, No Ammonia and Nitrate 1-16 ounce, glass Ii,SO, No Trace Metals 1-16 ounce. plastic IINO, Yes Pesticides 2-1000 ml, glass None No Hcibicides 1-1000 ml, glass None No Radionuclides and Radioactivity 2-32 ounce, plastic ENO, No Trip Blank 1-40 ml HCL No VOCs 3-40 ml, glass HCL No July 1992 Colder A..00iotes 913-2403 931061 • • • \ -§§§ k | _ , _ k $ Z■,« !!!! .;,:� 2123 # t 2 7. ((` S fl 0 !!: ,R; :3 1I| ; . . 7 E 272 3,: 324 ;f! G!§ } j • • • J J Q y z go cc cca -J zW CO W I- W 'J Ui J Q ~ CC 3r z w O 328E Iv= z2;a fga _ 9i 2322 F2 S3 lEgi 22AZ 3g22 I 2S=E DcE_ 2 221 R 8:$ az I 2A g2. z^a U - r 2 a a !Fe aaa RRa 38' 222 say 2yje a 2 4 . z as 2 ac FF. 22 2 2 r 3 22E aa a 222 22 022 22 • 2 • ,. 931061 • • • \\s Et; gEs 41 ` 3|j | 2\§§ &damC )/Er— U- „, \f�) �` - -� B , 2 2' H 1 \ }i k - §I 4 V22 ((� (( , a k j\( 5 a [ 471112 4791 75i 4711 73 4707 7 4 0 VI I III 2 it !! , ° S || 5}.. ;2'.:i1 0 k : X.X X ' ..- --. I -,.; ;; 222 U- .. � It , T f! 2722 - ° i\\ {7I' ELWIN roc e...m BOG EN.vun Historical Water Laicals III w§§§ !fu ,,, ° ! 1 } ! } 931061 • • • .;; !| 11 h}IM Dl SRO , ,; ; a : .17i a« y? NY} Ht7At NA NA :r 11 L\|§ „ ;i= .;- !f » ;3; ( „ ° & |u ' 22, DRY DRY NA p- -- {|\ § §)\ . li` 2 } (- / a;; / � : A, IF ril 7 II 1 a U1, R\2 a /2 IT ail: s: r3 if I \^\} |,,; // ;;. \ { !!|| !x■§`"� 1Historical Water Levels !|) !/} (Jute | , } 931061 • TABLE 4-2 SUMMARY Of VERTICAL GRADIENTS AT PC GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL PAIRS kg $ - # e ~ ) _ 7 f 7 m f ~k / ` ; ® 2 . 2 ! , . 2 2 `i f \ z - § ; , ; E § , , § ! 4731.11 4778.49 41, , k m CO $ > , § / BOTTOM Of SCREENED INTERVAL \ ) . } k k | \ } | ) \ \ \ } � 1761.74 181526 1771.22 1821.83 2 ® ) es , ) f se- 4781 71 1743 85 Z., — - R - • - \ 2 } . 74 - ) k \ 054 Si 4754 95 2 § ) \ } { | ! f \ | | 2 ' | § ! } { | f 7 2 | . / 2 | . / | I Golder Associates ! I 'U Hs !C P4 fl i $gp i • TABLE 4-3 SUMMARY OF WATER LEVELS IN t ANO FILLED AREAS la §#m@ f2„/z\$ o,%c[�}oo Ii ` ; -�� § I ; ° _ \ o ` \ \ }lmo2,* 7T± $§§§2/�YeYr G\-» ^\ a' ye,).). 4770.67 4770.63 NO § 3 /«-«® \§ a \ ® } , " § 4774 59 - ; ; } - 4773.42 a \ f: \ 4838.90 4643.55 -- -`4816.79 k 7 - ( f - : e- \ § \ \ ; I.l - ( 7 @ m P. - § - - § - N /I P. . ( \ I Z ` ! a a \ 931061 • ' a 1 I I I I I I I I I T1 1 I I r I 1 1 I 1 1 I I I I Cr¢ W a w 0- I I I I 1 I' • I 0 i I i I ii 1 1 lint i a 1 1 1 I 1 1 I l 1 I I I I 1 I I I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I I I I i i i i i I 1 1 I I i i I I - 5 W wl N 1 8 N n N S (V u' I N ije i Al n N S N 2 N i n (V 7 N i I b Q .2 ISu -1 Y bl Z,," 8 01 M1 W ID P. Ji T t0 SIT, I OI 0 O Iq T W .f N n 0 � p1 0' fV SEm l7 01 88.88888188888888888 . 44 M n I I I I I 1 I I I I I I 1; I i I l i 1 I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 I 6 a N l I N ti T p N I N 14 w N I N N • r N gY °- • J P.I 10 10 _ CI r W l_ 01 I M I 4,-1 4 04 1 am 44-1__ 01 1 Q M 1 I N N- J J N a a. 3 Y Y oI N N f -I al N a 17 =I 10 - I N N 10 N JI Y a 10 Y 01 a7 a 2 N m NI Y Rl01 1" (My N p N W 7, YI el W NI 43 tam N N O I Y O N G fl 7. N m NI 7 w 7'0 N O NI yM V U y U U U Q MI UNQ U N U U N M UI -J x N N ao� I ryl - N 1" a °I a o1 c lap ,c,. oi. 0 1A :I Ail N R dI 01 N N ^I NI N m o m c m o � e 0l U W In ' m 0 h O N 0 m 1 0.1 2_ 0 N^ 0 ^i 0' rol NI I o1 al OI J J N 7 N Jl m NI D >l col m m 0Di 1 `Jl D J to 7 7 0 m W J ] .o$} S COCOm g g w NI gI �I Nq U1 0 N I PI 2 f 21'0 N i N bl A1, l0 Ol I ° O c�at:' W 41I N u) Q91°010° I l of .•. 1 0 no U 6 0 1 a wr 6 0 N (� f7 10 (1J (7 �i / (,1'1 (.7I 0 j Golder Associates s a 931061 • • • cc WY- W O 'C N Projw.l Hunt.; Y13 -24A1 d c 'R i �- I I I I I I I I I 1 II 1 I I I fF, a w5 al a W) a G I I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 11 I I I 1 I 1 I I I III I I I I I 1 I 0 O N P N N P. iI I I I III I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I l 1 11 1 t Il 1 1 I I! f w� P o r g4 g i I I I I I I i I I II I I I I I I I g5 m N u 1no N N w N 2 N i n N Ino NI I i l r. I N II n N i N i i i 1 y16T. tl TY aas i i n YI OI 0 OI w 0'. al O s W N 10 0 N 10 tell 8 I p N i I I I 1u j y. W Iu p O p O C F. 8 o 8 pp 0 Q 8 pp 0 p TI p O I — p O r 1 p O I, I 1 1 •Q` y7 ti• 4 b 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 , 1 1 1 1, I 1 1 1 I I 1' IIIIIIII I 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 4 - el In 0. 10: IV el 1 I goo in n 1 1 1 1 1 I 11 I -1 q fr.W w N m r NM wI 1 tole N . I I 1 I 1 O N N IO 4- N N I 1 I I 1 1 .� O a N Iy N v \' M { l a Z n I YI 0I 0 I I 1 I P 0—— N l7 N I It'll I 1 1 Ig ;� = yY '2 N N N CO N N W co C 0 n Of 0 0 OI �I N n n 0 CO n 0 N _ I 0 Ol I 1 I. 0 CO O N N n n 0 co 4 U J L U 0 N a U in 3 O J L 1 <) i i I o 1 O O) N Ri 1 In m 1 0 O CI ni O M O- `? I 0 0 N I 0 OI 0 1 1 IN 1 0 o 0 JJ 0 Ol t O I espial r 01 l^ 'I Y1 Iti N 1 0 Al N °2 0 n W O ;7 0 171 h1 01 II v 1 In .O Y 1 r I n f r a •n 1 0 N 03 n RI 7 J? non Ol J n 0}1 OI 0 CO CO ' . : 0 7P,40•1 S 0 W c S f. o 144 p- 0 I- ojo W M 0 r 0 0 n r I- 0 0 n I-1 0 0 000(2000 0 2 i 0 2 i N 1 3 OI 3 2 3 1 3 22 3 1 3 3 doWw Auoobtes a 3 >≥301 2.;.;;;;;g Sci rn a 3 931061 | } SW $ ct a. a. § 0. :I : An S } r SI S g 01. ,I m = 00 I 00 CD 0.1 w, 0 ZOkftE 931061 S e O Y TABLE 5-2 SUMMARY OF LABORATORY PERMEABILITY TEST RESULTS z z o O a O o m N O 0 N 0 U fa , N N N Q . m IA ei O O N m OD a) o o o ft a jt O..4 U p M N A O fr' m m nJ 01 lY N. OI O O .. in °I N NN - YJ N a Ifl ✓1 Oi t0 O • Y J 7 I N C E N m l l ui m a E , y y _ g 'Optimum Moisture Ctent{%) ' m 4i 8 e 6 m 6- Average Permeability (cm/sac) I a C0 to m CI y Golder Associates 931061 TABLE 5-3 RESULTS OF CATION EXCHANGE CAPACITY (CEC) AND pH ANALYSES Well Samp1'c ' Intervrl (lt.'BGS) Geologic Unit "1: CEC meg/100q ' pH SG -3 11.2-13.0 Upper Wealhered Bedrock 18.3 7.5 SG -6 13.0.18.0 Surficial Unconsolidated 24.2 7.6 SG -9 22.1-23.0 Upper Weathered Bedrock 22.2 7.6 SG -16 23.0.28.0 Upper Weathered Bedrock 37.3 7.7 5O-20 a— 23.5.22.5 Upper Weathered Bedrock 22.4 7.9 Iuly 1992 913-2403 Golder Associates 931061 • TABLE 61 VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS ANALYZED IN WATER QUALITY SAMPLES Acetone Benzene Bromodichloromcthare Bromofornl Bmmomctha 2-Butanone (MEK) Carbon disulfde Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzcnc Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromethane Dibromochloromethane 1,1-Dichloroethanc 1,2-Dichloroethanc 1,1-Dichloroethene 1,2-Dichloroerhene (total) 1,2-Dichloroptopane ds• 1,3-Dichloropropene Irate-1,3-Dichloropropene Ethylbenzene 2-Heaanone Methylene chloride 4-Methyl-2-pentanate (MIBIC) Styrene 1, i,2,2-Tetrachlomethane Tctrachlorocthene Toluene 1,1,1-Tiichloroet ane 1,1,2-Trichloroethane Thchloroetene Vinyl acetate Vinyl chloride Xylenes (total) July 1992 913-2403 Golder Associates 931061 • /o/i5/9a • 0o0Eaa�,EE VVVVVVV ggggggg Iggggggl IE0000000 000000. V V V V V V 1 000cV00 p[ o V V VQV V gg25§og§25d_ 00000000' 000000E con § §ss V V 0 VOp 00000 .000 oV OV OV E e 0 o..`V V gg8g0008g VEead000 §aae2aaai V V V V V V vVEvo. iVVVVV OVV 00000 7V????? ggSN N N N Sa88N 0000000! IV V V §§§§ga' 0000000 VVVVQVV 00 VVVVVV00000 V cod '00000000 co. IVEVVeeV aga Igagggga 000 V V V 0 00000 00 WV V 0000000 V V V V V V V 09..0 2n IEo0000 00o0 9 O nn00000 YI0 a0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1000000000 1000 OOOOOOO, X000 V V V V V V V( V V V too 0000000! W <i NN m�..NnNnnn SAAAA N NNhNN ry p 71 x1 21 A iA Rli I sl 21 I i A 4 4 -0J0. N N vb w ".. O T O N 0 ^I I < Cw o ic0000wola�a� �Iuc�c� �w�U I.,�uuu�c�wo �;_ HI J N J J N rm mmmmm 2212 Golds Auoolohs Noss VOCs which wwa dstac led In al 3...z :222 �a H 931061 r TABLE6-2 (. SUMMARY OF VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS DETECTED IN WATER QUALITY SAMPLES ggggVSg 8eee-ae 7i -FA ;8ee888e g gg gggg fl =;ee ' ggggggg 8888S88 pyt ppggbggk eeee3„atee p g fp eeeeeee g g ees !R y! p p g p eaeeeee ggggggggg eees'eeed, ggggggg veevvve ggg eye ggg s= ededeea =r, � FA ggggoligg Svvvvcia.ee _ggggggg0000000 ggggggg vvvvvvv § l vvy §gggggg EvvvSvv ggggE sgigggga"sgg E???0047c v7� v ggg 7Tv ggaggggaw ??v?7 0g0e00000 0 0 eeveee�e ncccoon ��vv ggg000 eon �� ggggggg ddo 0990000 eeee��v ggg of gggggggg eee39aaev ee9ees igg epee - gggggggi y vvv e O -10 2000 nr..00o000n e, coon e 2vvvvSS 0000000 ne000OO ooe0000 vvvvvvv 000 000 0o vvS 2.2, 0,14, NqN'y 0Otyeg80 V76464.,*:-- 6 N Q NNM OO1I e.NNr. NN C' NN g eC�NNN "- a Nne Zn wN iiiiiiii Cae.•rvne i III y LF-UO N-OLscha,ps RP-INel JJN 222, Golder Associates 7 S a e S v E 931061 • • • TABI.E63,y TRACE METALS DETECTED Mt WATER QUALITY SAMPLES Loan Sample Date Cooanhtoo in mg/I Barium Cadmium Chromium Icon Manganese Shallow Wells GWMW-1 GWMW-2 GWMW-3 GWMW-4 GWMW-S GWMW-5N GWMW-SN (dup.) GWMW-6 GWMW-7 3/27/92 3/27/92 3/25/92 3/26/92 3/31/92 3/30/92 3/30/92 3/25/92 3131/92 <0.010 '035 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 023 0.025 0.011 0,021 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0,010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 0761 9.081 t.f4- 0.24 0.011 026 Deep Wells GWMW-8 GWMW-9 GWMW-10 GWMW-11 GWMW-12 GWMW-13 GWMW-14 3/27/92 3/31/92 3/25/92 3/26/92 3/31/92 3/25/92 3/26/92 0:013 <0.010 0:025 0:014 0.011 2E:0 <0.010 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 ma, <0.0050 <0.0050 <0,010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 O:ffS2 <0.10 <0.10 0:21 0-27 <0.10 <0.10 01:87 L7 0.25 037 0.88 .-T.1 Qr34 <0.010 <0.010 Surface Water ' ^:;, IF-UD' • N -Discharge RP -Inlet 3/26/92 3/27/92 3/26/92 a0 0,016 __ ton <0 0050\ <0:0050 <0.0050 {01-0-115)L'5 <0.0I0 <0.010 ) ' 00:41 01 r 0:044 Q4 Samples TB FB MB -60 3/27/92 3/27/92 3/30/92 NA <0.010 <0.010 NA <0.0050 <0.0050 NA ' <0.010 <0.010 NA <0.10 <0.10 NA <0.010 <0.010 NOTES: Detected concentrations are shaded. NA — Not Analyzed TB — Trip Blank FB — Field Blank MB — Method Blank July 1992 .r/ Gold.. Assoolot.s Vii:: • 3 3C - ' 913-2403 931061 • • • TABLE 6-4 NU ER ENTS DETECTED Di WATER QIIALTEY SAMPLES ...Location Sample Date - `. Concentration in mg/Y Ammonia (as N) : - Nitrate (as N) -.. Shallow Wells GWMW-1 3/27/92 <0.10 GWMW-2 327/92 <0.10 . GWMW-3 3/25/92 <0.10 GWMW-4 3/26/92 <0.10 OIf GWMW-5 3/31/92 <0.10 '3' GWMW-5N 3/30/92 <0.10 GWMW-5N (dup) 3/30/92 <0.I0 GWMW-6 3/2.5/92 <0.10 GWMW-7 3/31/92 <0.10 1.6 Deep Wells GWMW-8 3/27/92 <0.I0 7:4 GWMW-9 3/31/92 0:2$ <0.10 GWMW-10 3/25/92 0:69 Mil GWMW11 3/26/92 0;49 0 r4 GWMW-12 3/31/92 !:4 038 GWMW-13 3/25/92 0:58 D[t GWMW-14 3/26/92 0A.43 tt1 Surface Water LF•UD 3/26/92 <0.10 a<. N•Discharge 3/27/92 <0.10 RP -Inlet 3/26/92 <0.10 Q4 Samples TB 3/27/92 NA NA FB 3/27/92 <0.10 - <0.10 NOTE: Detected concentrations am shaded. NA a Not Analyzed TB a Trip Blank Ell gm Field Blank July 1992 Laboratory blank samples woe nor analyzed for nutrients. Gold« Aseoolatas 913.2403 931061 • • • { TABLE 6-5 RADIONUCLIDES AND RADIOACTIVITY DErEC ED 1N WATE . QUALITY SAMPLES Location. Sample Dam ' Activity in:pa/1 Gross Alpha "..Gross Beta Radium 226 Radium` 22$ Shallow Wells GWMW-1 3/27/92 67 50 2.0 1.9 GWMW-2 3/27/92 56 38 0.9 1.7 GWMW-3 3/25/92 180 47 7.0 6.2 GWMW-4 226/92 60 0.0 1.5 0.0 GWMW-5 3/31/92 19 36 0.0 1.4 GWMW-5N 3/30/92 90 55 1.4 0.9 GWMW-5N (dup.) 3/30/92 62 38 0.4 0.4 GWMW-6 :4/25/92 64 57 1.2 0.9 GWMW-7 3/31/92 82 76 0.0 1.3 Deep Wells GWMW-8 3/27/92 38 71 ,0.4 O 1+v O o-� N -� fi e-iN Cd C GP/MW-9 3/31/92 4I 25 2.1 G'NMW-10 3/25/92 49 28 2.9 GWMW-11 3/26/92 10 22 2.5 GWMW-12 3/31/92 5 1.4 1.0 GWMW-13 3/25/92 16 33 OS GWMW-14 3/26/92 11 17 L1 Surface Water LF-TJD 40 18 0.1 0.9 N -Discharge F3126/SC 3/27/92 15 14 0.0 0.3 RP -Inlet 3/26/92 _ 32 16 0.3 0.7 QA Samples TB NA NA NA NA 13/27/92 FB 327/92 0.8 1.6 0.0 0.0 NOTE: NA — Not Analyzed TB - Trip Blank FB a Field Blank Laboratory blank samples swat not analyzed for radioactivity. July 1992 Golder Associates 913.2403 931061 tuna/muter WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDAU - MO. F6kL(Cdll j! L� �^ � rr itj oiuw KAW forbore JAC 'gloats WD4 ;Mnrv.wr// 6nMgl P. nM REGIONAL SITE LOCATION MAP araY 1992 'ILL 1•.•8 MILES w..Mt S 4D.° 913-2403 931061 • • • 1 • 1 LAAbS v -A - V `^ B1g L-0„/":- t r-.e4n>An..un i ..._`9a t o: IO 7 ile r (PS Denver, Colorado mu GENERAL SITE LOCATION MAP cucNr/PRwccT WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL 11°'„" KAw uawi IA't JIM 1992 sr. "G. 923-2403 'tw hO /nN. h6. .ILIA( P.O. 1-2 JC I''w'i r.200D' wel AK .8. 931061 • r 2� I 6 6 u I K b 6 a n g ig f A A 931061 • r 6 14 SOURCE ALCERMSSEN, ET AL U992I MAP OF 1 Ci>QONTAL ACCEIERATCNEXPRESSED AS PERCENT t77AVfrY' N ROCK WITH A 10 PERCENT PROBABLIfY CF BEM FIflT11 D N 250 YEARS 0 PALES A00 Golder A.ASOCiIVCS Denver, Colorado SEISMIC HAZARD MAP DENVER & SURROUNDING AREA WEN- /✓Nlut'c WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFALL JULY 1992 """ "'.. 973-2403 CCR'' AS SHOWN " WFH 1-4 931061 • 931061 • Mm20a AMASON MOTICTIVO OCralt- IOnOIO CAP s MET CU/AMC KO -1 aAAO P T� 1CP OF 1WA PVC I 21EET UMW Apt{ 7 O4Q i 04.0•6 tea I 16•4112 PIXY ODNOIElt a11Y OOIIOMTTI PO1O! ONV AC CO e 101 al% start= Al aaar la DOM4 PIER sea COAR Mien VL WI O01®e VD? I01 Iw3/Q' CadOOTII —OlIUa9 =MACE 2 PEET Ell re REM PM YMMt[IfLlat CHOut FA1MlaEa COMECIThel. IEROH wMPtoD OCIO 0U[ MALL aM/IAwfwae Y lass— GAO ML .04eCM PVC ComuCAa{ MLUOIDIN 70OtapO WEI -tue et..L.a PUMP OPTIONAL maileaD 5lal/_T AV CM rAlalw1O O NOI WO MVP NPer metoRE YY fIRT mere. sac MO MOM WALE A/4 HILIM aUIn1M0 w.MLwr LAM WI LLOMM UPON wM5 r— !Onto, Or wits r•Oul colder OS/ moan. WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION CENTRAL WELD SAMTARY LANDFILL DUw plyt. o®o ac Tout TYPICAL SHALLOW MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAIL drt iSY 1902 'ILR OGMO NTS a a 913-2403 PtrIt00 WM 0•Lis 'was 2-2 9.31061 i asdOMZED MAMMAS. MOMCMV• COAT Al 100064 CAP • Mp MENE M= 1CR MEOW TON�, EOP110100m OTC �MIT, haw•, AVOEE sow 4^01,2 M.w M10M CMPW MMM d2 CIRCIETE 01W EfMl MTE MUMS OW 2 FOP ON NC MET PPE Trt4WFWEM COME ow- MAPPED n N M(\IEMV Ew.N11V 2•aa CLOW 1404 63.0104 PC COMMOVE PUT Wn2wWWI a4r.1Tl 11NLL .lvno •MI1/a4!MP GAMMA. OFFILWED Fla BEan.T 2u.P w AEEPa1hPro PVC CAP • 0020A. NOW= •Y•I•, 3/• MOa PRA GRAVEL MOOR OD•Is ••NW 10211.022 V• IC. 90wDC TOFF 101 MI )1001 CASINO OOIM MEOW MMCLM fl _EMS•Cara a POOR OW TO a FIST row CA a .aAaWT sawow *VS •EMM,TE/aupw 4POVr — S.C. S1M PETER 644 FEET BEMTCMTE SE•. 3 R PROM, 2•M2 Pip( ABOVE W A flak alga CC•CETIO • "%MAW 0306 a 1WYTM WKR ---00}201•4 MILL MOLE Golder CLIENT, PROMO' WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL SOL 0-0.41) JAG lava WH TMLI TYPICAI. DEEP MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAIL OWE US 992 FILL •iat NTS a"' 913-2403 0M,RM n«w 2-3 931061 6 NCH DU. ALLKeNL111 CASING WITH LOCKNG LD 1/4 NCH PEA GRAVEL 1/4 NCH ORAN HOLE CONCRETE AROUND CASNG TO COVER CEMENT-BENTONITE GROUT SEAL. CEMENT-BENTOMTE GROUT SEAL INCH PVC PROOF. SCH 40 FILTER RACK ISANU;:Ij::_, -1 NCH PVC PROBE, SCH 40 010 NCH SCREEN 1 NCH PVC CAP. SCH 40 GRAVEL PACK 114 NCH PEA Ci1AVEL e NCHES 4 2 FEET 3 NCHES 2 FEET 1 VARES FOOT t 2 FEET t PANNuM 2 FEET BORE DEPTH VARE5 Golder Assoda es Cenver, Colorado TYPICAL LANDFILL GAS MONITORING WELL SINGLE PROBE WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL CER locr, ;siw.L JULY 1992 NTS h.` 9132403 C"•, WEH 2-4 931061 T90Tr6 k 9 ti 3 I 931061 J 931061 • 931061 / s t 1"I, � 1 Jl �-r �I • JI B Il R i 3r 7fr r I A {. Vv A G I I $ �ti -A-- �>R a. J r _ 4?7 7 'T ' t I ,(Lt,'_ I r' J 4 /4__�1 , 7 1 �x Iv a 17, g 9 • • 931061 hi! zitais i i ,4 I ci t j .41 3fta, t V +Ili' t, (I a L , r I tC �' 1. _ j`:,, B 1'I F gl ----. 1j �i.\ 11 \ 11l Nt ''. ~ • A �, �. '( Ixi 2? (rr ? It / i. I e 6 2 f - F fi r I��t % f VI l a A4 /J 1 //)) I ; i 1 oN' '' I S�. IIl5r Ui; �i 'q 14r H- i / 1 11I r 93 CATIONS ANIONS LEGEND ❑ SHALLOW MONITORING WELLS + DEEP MONITORING WELLS O SURFACE WATER SAMPLING SITES Golder Associates Inc. Denver, Colorado CLIENT/ PROJECT WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL TITLE TRILINEAR DIAGRAM OF WATER QUAUTY SAMPLES o►n July 1992 N/A Jw.n 923-2403 atom ruing KAW cntacco RTB navy a WEH /ILL DUO. NO. 6-1 931061 Golder Associates Inc. 200 Union Boulevard, Suite 700 Lakewood. CO USA 80228 Telephone (303) 980-0540 Fox (303) 985.2080 HYDROGEOLOGIC AND GEOTECHNICAL CHARACTERIZATION FOR THE CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL WELD COUNTY, COLORADO VOLUME U Prepared for: Waste Services Corporation 5660 Greenwood Plaza BiviL, Suite 400 Englewood, Colorado 80111 Prepared by: Golder Associates Inc. 200 Union Boulevard, Suite 100 Lakewood, CO 80228 (303) 980-0540 Distribution: 10 copies - Waste Management of Colorado, Inc. 2 copies - Golder Associates Inc. July 1992 913-2403 OFFICES IN AUSTRAUA, CANADA. GERMANY, HUNGARY, ITALY. SWEDEN, UNITED KINGDOM. UNITED STATES 931061 • !}1k44l�fFn ye,AA �L (r'.Y'yaAnr�'f. h7sn P✓R„4Nemrrt' Yfw��a'J! rt 2 n h' y�wnK {J; yLi JS,iti•kr' 04161451 ?hi"w.r' M%?'� !a 6r ":�. w. a .` " ?(fat #y vc.i I'Jr*"try ^d'ao:.;, 4•. -"nog.- ;tn"G ✓,.4W.: N'.FYi.Ya .. .-.r... ). �7:Y''.:1 iN iThY, ^„ wl..u.^•n.i-.r ..w.,s,wvP i*,w1uS APPEND X"A GEOTECRNICAL BOREHOLE LOGS MAJOR DIVISIONS GRAPHIC SYMBOL GROUP sYMBOL TYPICAL DESCRIPTIONS GRAVEL AND CItA[I GRAVELS '• -' :.....'r- ,• y.• ^• ••• • ' r • W V .cu -c wm w.ax a.sa.sMI0 WZ7wn• LIMA a NR rM6 COARSE GRAINED GRAVELLYfiWo SOBS • . . ' ' • - � • - G P IONLY-CnOtO PAIL. COWL - L40 lima. uric a 40 noel SOILS inn YNa VA a PARSt r.ACInt $0. I SIM GRAVELS 4 limn F I r .' . 1 A �y GM v sax( imams. wwwL-SNQstr wm[ts eget nee I rl C)G \'keep4IKiVK5 C cum OrAR[. wRL-=..D-u.. won NAN 501 SANG AND SANDY CLAW SAND •I , % :•',:: •�•'.: ,'...,; S W MOLL-rAutto tows. OAMro.AY Sa Lint a NO MCI Of 4ArrinAL IS WAGESs nom NO. zoo sNY[ 32[ SOILS iS� N(S S S P roNnr-CNAOCO wan, WRLLY Sao; ant OA 40 rM[S Less YNAN so+. Or COMM rN,[noN lIIsVgp ON NO. 4 saw SANDS WITH 11 , : S: • 1 I'� 3 1 : • 4j:5�:J± . 1 • C M S SILTY SAKI. SWO-slLr YOir1/.CS MAN 1 o (1N A \ 1 \.• SC [G1(Y SfNOS. SANG -CG/ "I"n SILTS I J I I L t L EVI I"0&G!l[ & C sari MI0 VU!NC SfNRs. NOCK R.. WSNMT aURS CAF[ Sans on CURT San .mI vuxr nASrICm FINE GRAINED SOILS A/ID Una 'Jug\.\•. SLIT TWO SOZ CLAYS \ ` \\\\\ C L Ngrca4IC Curl Or LOW ro tail Ras- M C Y n, swot CLAYS. WY CLA-1. L044 CLAYS O L townv[n An OICANC Sift Curs or LPN RASYIC1Y WOK ,NM On I A I I _ Ill 1. ' III'..,,;'' l M H flC.OAMC an. luCOOYs a 0utwAC[0Ns MIN[ WO a WY San a AU7LRAL a Iq 200 ELYNTH a .San 9QE SILTS e . IT AND r�M / C MONCAMC C CLAYS ON NNN MSnO1Y. In can CLAYS 0 u oilcan CUTS Of *gum }D KKK�I nAmOIY. OKKCANO Sgls HIGHLY ORGANIC SUS P i Mr. wws. Swats sat mill NICK ._.....- 1 MAW cOorrOn C Ma sPMOL[ An unto To ofeloCAIT ncan,l( so.. CUSWaNQVI CLAYSr04[ ROCK I''' "'^ ` 54405704[ TYPES• at=tite$ Denver, Cdorado SOIL AND ROCK CLASSIFICATION CHART CUENT/PROJEGr WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL DRAM N oati IDArE juNE1992 �JOe NO. 923-2403 MMUS JAC iS r NOT TO SCALE we Nc."REt NO. z40JCLA5.DwC RLV LIVID �,,F1LE NO. WFy uRE Na. SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE !NAME AND LOCATION ORILUNG METOO: 3.23' IA 72t OD DOPING NO. NOLLDV STEM AUGER G7-1 I spier WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION SAMPLING METHOD: CONTINUOUS SAMPLE DARREL t or 2 CENTRAL VELD SANITARY LANDFILL GREELEY, COLORADODRI " NOrthrcy START 1 f1MSM 371.732.39 Ens tog. 2,193,133.00 WATER LEVEL 203' 19.0' 1 17.3' 1LZ TIME TIME TMC 1000 I 1020 I 1142 1447 0900 1000 DATE 2/13/9212/13/92j 2/13/9212/13/92 I Oat °ATE DATUM NGVO ELEVATON 4812.33 CASING oFPTN 1 I 2/13/92 2/t3/92 DRILL RIG CME-33 j SURr4CE CCN0 10MS field ANGLE 90 er,ARINC NA 1 SAMPLE HAMMER NA `& TrR RESULTS 4--- i- ti W e 8v i Vaya \ O ; I' a1ol- I ut SAMPLZ NUMBER AND DESCRIPTION OF MATERML „A, tr C Q gte \≤ 'n `yZ� OO z a` I$ a 1 a . .n = O — I — - Z 3 \ \'. \(3.0'-9.O') \ (D.0'-3."') Very soft, dark yeu0w.sn brown, (10VP 4/4). SILTY CLAY, sane fine S4nd strongly WlCorvous. Some roots, dry, (CL -ML) $4FF, yellowish bt0wn, (1OYQ S/<), SILTY CLAY. little fine Sand. Strongly calcareous, occas.onal dry. (CL -ML) Ol CS _ — — — -. -. 0 0 0 4 — I- 6 ] $ 1\ \ roots, <8A' -17 ,-- 2 CS '� - — — — o a 0 ' 9 — — -- 10 - 11 —12 r — 13 — b r .0')r;n, rown (10YR 3/3), flee SAND and SILT. Colcortoae, gypsum. don0, <ML-SM) O CS — _,. — — — — t i < I' — — --14 — — _ U3.0'-14.8') Very s0it, yeg0*Ish arOrA (lOYR 5/6). fine SAND, trace Silt, CalCareOus, gypsum, dano. (SM) I (14.8'-13.60 Slightly weathered very ink, tlgnt ()U ()U.!, gray. (SY 6/0. CLAYSTONE, nontalcartoms, _ VEATHERED BEDROCK ® CS — — - .- — 0 a 0 a < < < a' 4.1 a Y z 931061 SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE NAME AND LOCATION WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL GREELEY, COLORADO Nortnmo' 371,332.39 EaStag, 2.193.173,00 ' OATUM NGVD ELEVATION 4912.73 DRILLING METN00: 3.25' IA 7.27' OD i BORRIG NO. t MOLLDV STEm AUGER G7-1 SMELT SAMPUNG MEN00; CONTINUOUS SAMPLE BARREL 2 of 2 DTwNG 7 START 1 mass WATER LEVEL 20.3' I 19.0' 113• I 17.2' TIM( TIME nME 1000 I 1020 1142 14+7 0900 1000 OATS 12/13/9212/13/92 y 2/13/9212/13/92 DATE I WC CASING DEPTH 1i s. 1 2/13/921 2/13/92 DRILL RIG EME-53 I SURFACE CON0ITI0NS Fie10 ANGLC 90 BEARING NA SAMPLE NAMMER NA DEPTH w EEEI (ELEVATION) blow/ fi_YL ON SAY FIER (RECOVERY) !LST wCsul?S gSIMPLE N NUMBER ANO DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL S W L X .3 i �" e°65 N cc X83 � 3 q V A 3 — -..- 15 - ` 17 Y — — _- _- ' - CI3.6'-i9.0•) Highly weotnereo, extrenely weak, aght Olive gray, (5Y 6/1), CLAYSTONE_ VEATNERED BEDROCK (16.6') gy0aun (18.0'-20.3') Slightly weathered. very weak. dive FHe CS - — - - - - 18 19 - 20 = - 21 — -- 22 _ - - �,. Cin - -_ Or%Y. <5Y 3/2). CLAYSTONC and silty SANDSTONE noriC0100reoo5. WEATHERED BEDROCK (20.5-23.0) Slightly weathered. eXtrehel wen. Olive gray, <SY 3/J, CLAYSTONC and SILTETCNE nOnC01COreous, ton oxide stoining, VEATNERED 3EDROCK CS �� — - - — 0 0 0 7 0 0 —� 23 — 24 -- 25 —26 _ 27 —28 — 29 tom depth - 23.0' . — -- --I _ N tai TI on 0 4.1 UI 3 931061 SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE 441.4E AND LOCATION WASTE SERVICES CORPCRATIDN CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL CREELEY, CCLCRADC Northing, 371,490.99 East:ng, 2.193.156,04 DATUM NGVQ ELEVATION 4814,27 DRILLING METHOD: 3.27' IA 7.23' OD I BORING NO, MOLLOV STEM AUGER C' -z SHEET SA•PUNG METM06 CONTINUOUS SAMPLE eAPREL 1 OR 2 ORIWNc START FINISH WATER LEVEL 18.8' I 18.6 I 18.7' j 18.7' TIME TIME TIME 1140 1150 I 1445 I 1416 1020 1125 DATE 2/13/92 2/13/92 2/13/92 2/14/92 DATE GATE CASING DEPTH l 2/13/92 2/17/92 DRILL RIG CME-53 SURFACE CONDRIONS Field ANUS 90 9cymINC NA SAMPLE HAMMER NA - TEST RESULTS n^ y0� = y '4 t,' it.. rc.m fj 0z 6o - N SAMPLE NUMBER ANO OESCRIPTiON or MAtERUI, o �{ ,; l x ,q !! o" $sd M ,_ yW sZ . o j nl x - _ 1 _ 2 3 \ %C.C'-3.0') Soft. brown, (10YP 4/3), SILTY CLAY. - sane Fine Sand. str3ngly CalCareous. damp, (CL -MO ;: O CS — — — T _ - _ d — S 6 — 8 1� \ ,. <3.0'-8.0') Soft. brown. <10YR 5/3>. SILTY CLAY, some fIne Sena. strongly CaLCareOus, aorta. (CL -ML) CS S - = — — — - — -9 10 - - 1 1 — 12 — 13 (8.0'-13,0') Very soft. yellowish brown. <10YR 5/4). Fine SAND. some silt, gypsum. Iron oxide staining, noncolCareous. clomp, (SM) C13.0'-13.3') O CS - - -- - — — _ — _-14 — - Loose. yel(ow.sn crown. <10YR 5/4>. f,nt SAND. trace Sat. gypsum. iron ox;ow staining. nonCa(CareOus. (SM-SP) O CS — — - — WILLING (NGir(CRS o� nl 0.1 2 cc O III ENAME:. 4J_?_- 931061 • • SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE NAME AND LOCATION I ORILUNC I,ILTwOo: 3.25' ID. 7,23' CD BORING NO, NCEM A LLOV STUGER GT-2 SKIT WASTE SERVICES CCRPCRATION SAAIRUNC MC1cO ctrnMIOUS SAMPLE BARREL a OF a CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDr[LL OawNC GREELEY, COLORADO '.TART I YlNNSN Northing 371190.99 Cast:Age 2493,176.04 wATER LCVS. j 18.6' 18.6 1 18.7' 18,7' TIME nuE Tat I 1140 1130 I 1415 + 11416 1020 1123 DATE l 2/13/9212/13/92 2/13/92 2/14/92 DATE PATE DATUM NgV0 ELEVATION 481427 CASINO DEPTH I , 2/13/92 2/13/92 DRILL RIG CME-55 I SURFACE CONCIPONs Field ANGLE 90 BEARING NA SAMPLE HAMMER NAI TEST RESULTS t,-, 3 iw 1L- tt i3. 3 g5AMP G µD TUBER DESCRIPTION OF IMTEF14: oY re t 3 'te NQ., d, 7L. it 8 M 3 '' en 6.1i.' -- 16 — i 7 I,I (13.3'-L7.c') Loose, yellowish brown, (10YR S/n. Fine SAND, trace Silt, nonCalCareOus, damp, (SM) I I (17.0'-!7.9') LO05e. yellOw,eh brown. (ICYR 5/4), Fine SAND. trace Silt, noncalcareOus, (SP -Ste) CS — — — (17.8'-19,2') Loose, brownish (10YR 6/6), — 18 19 — — 20 _ -21 -22 yeuOw, Tine SAND. nonCacCare0us, damp, (SP) (19.2'-19.4') Gypsum "_ C19.4'-22.9') Mlrly weathered, extremely weak, dark — yellowish orange, (10YR 6/6). CLAYSTCNE and w. _ SILTSTDNE, lenses of File Sand, nOnCatcureous, wet, _ VEATMERED BEDROCK __ - Total depth - 22.9' O CS - - - 23 - 24 - 25 -- 26 27 -- 28 - 29 - — — en co i co a U 8 of NI egj PI 0 z CC 0 n I nl CJ N I I 9310611 SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE NAME AND LOCATION WASTE SERVICES CCRPCRATICN CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL GREELEY, CCLCRADC Northing, 371.713.30 CastAgo 1193.140.76 DATUM NGvp CLEYADON 4821.19 ORILUNC MEn400: 325' IA 725' OD BORING NO MCLLCV STEM AUGER GT-] I SNEET SPUN 4E^mD: CONTDNUous sANPLc BARREL 1 OF 2 DRILLING START FINISH WATER LEVEL dry tie, TUAE TIME n4E 1420 I 1428 I 1315 1410 DATE 2/13/92 2/14/92 II GATE DATE CASW0 Imam 2/13/92 DRILL RIG CME-55 I SURFACE. CONomoNs Freed ANGLE 90 3 APiNC NA , SAMPLE NA44ER NA TEST RESULTS WS �'S' Z� y J a W 0� kj ;_u i$ 3- SAMPLE NUMBER AND DESCR'PTION OF 4ATERML '3 I -I vl Z 11 1 3`i \≤ o" w2.3 w zW y, 3V K 2 Q W J N 1 _ 2 \ \ <0.0'-3.0') Soft. yeiiow.sn brown, (10YR 3/4), SILTY CLAY, sone fine Sand, strongly ColCareOus. JCCosionol TOOTS. dry. (CL -ML) I)— CS S 4 3 _ — 6 - 7 \ 1 (3.0'-$.0') Soft, yellowish brown, (IOYR 5/4), SILTY CLAY. sone fine Sand, trace coarse to medium Sand. strongly Calcareous, don0, (CL -ML) CS s - - _ _ _ 8 = 9 10 — (8.0'-10.8') NO reCOvery (10.0'-'26') Soft. brownish <10YR 6/6). �••••, NR J — 11 - 12 S. \ \ \ yellow. I SILTY CLAY. sone f;ne Sono. traCy Coarse Sand, trace fine Gravel, strongly Calcareous. damp• (CL -Mu (126'-13.09 LOOse, yellowish brown, (1OYR 5/4). Pine SAND, trace SYt, noncalsoreous. gypsum, <SP) C CS _ — <13.0'w15.0') Loose. Yellowish brown, (IOYR 5/4), Finn SAND. trace 5112. nonCalCareOus. gyosun, (SP) ,._..,, v.. — 13 _14 O CS - R CC 0 U U 'A U WWWr �I r, AI .7I 931061 • • SOIL BOREHOLE LOG slYg NAME AN0 LOC#fON WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL GREELEY, COLORADO Northing, 771,713.50 Easing% 2,193,140.76 DATUM NGyt ELEVATION 4921.19 DRILLING IICRHOO, 3.25' ID. 7.23' CO I WRFC NO. HOLLOW STEM AUGER I GT-3 I SHEET SAMPUNC MO1400: CONTINUOUS SAMPLE BARREL ( 2 OF 2 I DRILLiNc START FIw9l a HATER LEVEL dry dry TIM( TIME 1IME 1420 1420 1713 1410 DATE 2/13/9212/14/92 OATS CATE CASING DIPTM , j 2/13/92 2/13/12 DRILL RIG CME-55 SLIPPAGE CONC4TONS Field ANGLE 90 BEARING NA SAMPLE HAMMER NA TES' RESULTS W n,6 = r'^ rED- ,0jtt{d SAMPLE NVMBER DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL o '7 u k 3 H yb w Q W N b _ — 16 (15.0'-15.5') Highly weathered, extremely weak, brown,5h yeltow, (1OYR 6/6). CLAYSTCNC, noncalCareou5, dry, WEATHERED BEDROCK (15.5'-16.7') Highly weathered, very weak, yellowish brown, (IOYP 5/4), fine SANDSTONE. noncalcoreous. CS - 17 H. -_ dry, WEATHERED BEDROCK (i L7.5') Highly weathered. extremely weak, — — ,7 orownich yellow. (IOYR 6/6). CLAYSTONE. dry, WEATHERED - — 18 - .— 19 — 20 ---21 — — 22 noncalcoreous. ,ron oxide Stavvg BEDROCK (17.5'-18.0') Highly weathered. extremely weak. yellOwish brown, (10YR 5/4), fine SANDSTONE noncalcoreous, dry, WEATHERED BEDROCK (10.0''20.5') Highly weathered extrerely weak, yellowish brown, (IOYR 5/A, Rine SANDSTONE. nencatcareous, dry, WEATHERED BEDROCK <20.5'-23.0') Highly weathered, extremely weak,— yellowish brown. (10YR 5/4), fine SANDS TONE noncolcareous. dry, vEATMERED BEDROCK (23.0'-24,0') Mlghly weathered. extremely weak. yellowish brown. (IOYR 5/4), fine SANDSTONE, noncalcoreous. dry, WEATHERED BEDROCK S O CS -- — w• — .. — 23 — 24 ^— 25 (24,0'-24.1') Gypsies 224,1'-25,2') Mighty weathered. extrerely weak, .. ,� brownish yellow, (IOYR 6/6). CLAYSTONE. lenses of sn... fine Sand, noncalcoreous. ion mode staving dry, WEATHERED BEDROCK _ (25.2'-25,5') Highly weathered. extremely weak, (IOYR 5/4), Fine SANDSTONE. O— CS — — yellowish brown, noncalcoreous, iron Ox•fie staving dry, WEATHERED —.-- - 26 —' 27 —28 -- 29 BEDROCK Total tleDth • 25.5' — SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE MANE AND LOCATION WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL GREELEY, COLORADO" Nor thing, Cos rnq DATUM NGVO ELEVATION ORIwNG METH00: 72P ID. 7.23' CD !. BORING N0. HOLLOV STEM AUGER CTra SHEET S4uPUNC 1109400: CCNTTNUCuS SAMPLE BARREL I 1 00 3 NG START flesh+ wATCR LEVEL dry i 26.3' TIME mg( TIMf 1700 1337 1510 1700 PATE 2/13/92 2/13/92 GATE DATE CASING DEPTH 12/t3/92 '313/92 GRILL PIC CME-33 SURFACE CONOInONS Field ANCA,E 90 BCAPI NC NA SAMPLE HUMMER NA I (r+onvn3i3) 1333 111 141430 2 Blows/rOOr 011 CASING TEST RESULTS 11W: Ic` i 8.3- g SAMPLE NVMRER AND DESCRIP'ION OF IMTERLAL o Z rc r 1 w v v M `z ,. 9� M 2 r t 2 (D.0'-2.59 St; f, brown, (IOY2 3/3). SILTY CLAY, \strongly co caredus. numerous roots, dry, (CL) 1 \ :a3' -3.T) Very SOFt, crown, (IDYR 3/3), C:AYE ,� strongly colCareows, nwnerous roots, dry, (ML- I O CS _ _ 3 coSILT. P — — 4 5 — 6 (3.0'-6.8') Loose, pole brown, (IDYR 6/3), Fine SAND, trace Sat, strongly calcorwdut roots, wry, (5P) O CS _ 7 — 8 \ <6.8'-8.0') StIFF. very pole brown. <IOYR 713), CLAYEY SILT, troce coarse to Fine Sono strongly colCareOus, roots, dry, 04L -CL) _ • • 9 -- 11 12 13 �' \ (8.0'-10.1') Sticc, very pate br0w4 (IDYR 7/3), CLAYEY SILT, trace coarse to GIMP Sond, strongly Calcareous, roots, dry, (ML'CL) - - <10.4'-13-0') Loose, tight yel:ow.sh brown. (109P 6/4), fine SAND, trace Silt. noncolCareous. don0. , . <SP) CS •• — - -- — _ —14 — — (13.0'`13.2') LoOle, light yellowish brown, (lOYR 6/4), ;in SAND and SILT, noncalcareous, gypsum, done, (SP-SM) O CS _ — _ _ S G U C T m W C G Q1 I o 3 z O -a w 931061 SOIL BOREHOLE LOG sat NAME AND LOCATION ORIWNG METH00: 3.25' ID. 7.25' CD BORING N0. HOLLOW STEM AUGER CI -4 SHEET WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION SAMPUNG METN00: CONTINUOUS SAMPLE BARREL 2 OF 3 CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL GREELEY, COLORADO oRILUNG START TINS* Northing, I Casta+9' WATER LEVEL dry 26.5' I 11uE nuE { DK 1700 1357 1500 1700 DAR: 12/13/92 2/13/92 GATE DATE DAYVM NOVD ELLVADON CASING DEPTH 1 2/13/92 2/13/92 DRILL RIO CME-33 I SURFACE CONDITIONS find ANGLE 90 BEARING NA SAMPLE HAMMER NA TEST RESULTS t'jW^ ' `r+' ?W W F al 0O SIMPLE NUMBER AND DESCRIPTION or MATEF.'!AL i 5 C 3 pp O Y \ o§fiQ M Q F ail o t 1 3 16 - — I7 l (13.2'-17.3') LOOSe, light yellowish brown. QOYR 6/4), find SAND co* SILT. noncotcoreowc, 9yosun, damp. (SP-SM) (17.3'-.°B.3') MlDhly weathered. exfr�amely wlak. orownlsh (10YR 6/0). SILTSTONE P$ 18 --.I Jr1F yellow. and CLAYSIONE, Interlannated with fine SANDSTONE. nOnCotc Areows, !ran Owlde stoining, gypsum. amp, WEAYHERED -19 2D 21 .- - — n — 23 - --1= • BEDROCK - (20.5'-22.0') Highly smothered, extremely reek, moderate yellowish brown, (10YR 5/0, SILYSTCNE and fine SANDSTONE, Interlo .noton7 OP CLAYSTONE. COoryening downward, noncslcarnoun, dan0. WEATHERED BEDROCK O CS - —_ W — - — 24 - - 25 (23.0'-2S.S') Highly weathers, extrenely weak. _ moderate yellowish brown <1OYR 5/4), PAR SANDSTONE, sone interionMated SILTSTONE, noncaIcoreous, :ron oxide staining, done, WEATHERED BEDROCK CS — ..„ - - - - '" 26 - — 27 — 28 -. -_ - (25.5'-27.0') Flighty weothered. extrenely weak, moderate yellowish brown. (IOYR 5/4U, SILTSTONE and fine SANDSTONE, noncalcareous, done, WEATHERED BEDROCK- (27.0'-28,0') Highly weothered. wxtrwmwty weak, LOOT Otwe gray, (5Y 6/17 SILTY CLAYSTONC. noncalcoreous. iron oxide staining, Bono, WEATHERED BEDROCK - - —, _ 29 - - (28.0'-29.2') Highly weathers, extrenely weak, dark -- yell0H.Sh orange, <10YR 6/67 SILTSTCNE, - noncatcareouS, done, WEATHERED BEDROCK --- (29.2'-30.5') Hignty weathered, weak. orong:sh brown to gray. CLAYSTONE intertan.neted with SILTSTENE, - noncotcortous. dome. VCATNERED BEDROCK - - _ CS _ - t 931061 SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE NAME AND LOCATION DRILLING METOD: 325' ID. 7.2Y OD ' BORING NO. MCLLCV STEM AUGER GM -4 SMEET WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION SAMPUND IAETM00: CCNTtNUOus SAMPLE BARREL 3 or 3 CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL GREELEY, COLORADO I ORIWNG START I miss NOr Thing, Euss�ng� WATER LEVEL I dry 26.31 11 nME I MAC nUE 1700 I 1337 L I 130o I 1700 DATE 2/13/9212/13/92 I DATE OATS DATUM NGVD EI.EYAIION CASING MIN I 1 2/13/92 2/13/92 DRILL RIO CME-33 SURFACE CONDITIONS field ANGLE 90 BEARING NA SAMPLE HAMMER NA 1 TEST RESULTS .. 'J-lur u�i ;,, �R D�!i-I D5CR:orMTERL i. i j OZ 1�$ iL'1$s¢ ,,,s N F!',74. su W YN Fill CS _ — 31 — 32 — 33 — 34 ---- 33 --36 37 — 38 39 40 41 -- 42 - 43 44 Iota( deg<e R 3D3 - = - - - - u O U U J C oi 931061 SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE NAL(E ANC LOCATION ORIWNG MEnl00: 3.25' ID, 725' OD j OORINI Ng. GT NIL LJW STEM AUGER -5 SHEET WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION SAMPLING MEH00, CONTINUOUS SAMPLE 3ARREL 1 OF 3 CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL OerWNG GREELEY, COLORADO START I FINISH NOrttung' Eastmg' WATER LEVEL dry I tale nue m it AGO I 0745 1010 LUTE i 2/14/92 DATE ! arc a1UM NCVD CLEVAnON I USING DEPTH I 2/14/92 2/14/92 DRILL RIG CME-55 i SURFACE CONDITIONS Field ANGLE 90 REARING NA I SAMPLE HAMMER NA TTST RESULTS G,-, '- Z < 1 W 4,`V ,aja,, Sr U SAMPit NWOER AND DESCRlPt10N OF MATERNL c < �, i ` �j .5 8w '4 V E 3 H d W K a 0 J = 6 — — \` :5 0.-0.9.) St;FF, dark yellowsh brown. (IOVO 4/4). \\\"-LAYEY SILT. tittle foe Sand. strongly ralcareOus. (ML -CL) _ I — _ (0.9'-1.9') Very stiFF. very owe brown (10YR en), ,- sTY CLAY, little pine Sand, strongly calcareous, dry, <CL -MU 0 C. _ _ — - 2 — (1.9'-2.6') Very soft. pale yellowish brown, (IOYR e/2), SILT and Fine SAND, strongly calcareous. dry, — 3 (n1.-3111 - 4 _ — — 5 _ (2.6'-3.3') Very s<IFF, very pole brown. TIOYR 9/3). SILTY CLAY, Uttte fine Sand, strongly calcareous, dry, (CL -IL) <3.3'-6.0') Loose, light yvuowith brown, <10YR 6/4>, Fine SAND, sone Silt. strongly calcareous. dono. an) O CS _ — _, — _ _. 6 (6.0'-4.0') No recovery NR — -- 8 — 9 -10 = - 11 - 12 (BA' -13.0') SSIFF. yellowish brown, (IDYR 5/6), SILTY CLAY, and FA* Sand. trace fine Gravel. strongly calcareous, gypsum, damp. (CL -MU (13.0'-13.8') Loose, yellowish brown, (IDYR 5/6% Q CS _ _ _ — _ — _ t 3 - mt.. 14 _ — — Doe SAND and SILT, trace Clay. strongly calcareous, damp, (5)11 (;3,e' -17.l') Very loose. yellowish brown, (IOYR 6/6), fine SAND. SO.), Silt, strongly CalCoreOus, dory, (SP-SM) O CS - — N W w ZI u e N al G V 931061 SOIL BOREHOLE LOG Slit NAME AND LOCAnON VASTE SERVICES CORPORATION CENTRAL VELD SANITARY LANDFILL GREELEY, COLORACO Northing, I Casting. DATUM NOVI) ELEVArcu i DRILLING mEThO0: 3.23' IA 7.25' OD BORING No. NCLLOV STEM AUCER GT-S SHEET SAURUNC METN00, CCNYINUCUS SAMPLE BARREL 2 Or - ORIwNC START FlNf�N wATER LEVEL 1 ory l j ( nUE {L Tim, mac 1400 1 I 0743 1010 DATE 2/14/921 1 OAls UAt( CASING DfP'TN I ! La/14/92 I_ 2/14/92 DRILL RIG CME-S5 I SURFACE CONDRSONS field ANGLE 90 eEARINC NA SAMPLE MAMMCR NA I DEPTH N FEET (ELEVRIOR) BLOW/ kit C✓l SNIPIER (RE COVERI) ici !EST enVLTS g H SAMPLE NUMBLR AND DESCRIPTION or MATERML e 3j K Z .§ 1 a t 0 ice 2' N c W� 3 M 4 J , vi 7 _ _ 16 17 {`k!1 t:I '-18.6') Cs _ - _ — 1 Sti��, brownish yellow. (10YR 6/6). CLAYEY SILT. Sore fine Sand, strongly calcareOMs. (ML) — 18 _ — 19 20 21 —22 1 __ -- (18.6'-19.8') Highly weathered. extremely *volt, darts yellowish brown, (IOYR 4/4), rILTSTONE. dry. V nonCalCareous, dEATMERED BEDROCK (19.8'-30.3') Mlghly weathered, extremely *eau, brownish yellow, (10YR 6/6), fine SANDSTONE— interlQminate0 with S TSTONE nonCalCareous. dry, WEATHERED BEDROCK CS — _ — _ — — 23 -2a.L: _— 25 zs = 27 �I - CS _ _ 28 _^ 29 _ — 0 CS — _ SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE NAME ANO LOCATION DRILUNC METIWO: 123' ID. 7.23' CO ' BORINC N0. HOLLOW STEM AUGER ( CI -5 SHEET WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION SAMPUNO MET$O0+ ctNTI$Jws SAMPLE BARREL 1 or 3 CENTRAL 1./CLD SANITARY LANDFILL GREELEY, COLORADO I DRILLING START GN $M NoreNmcp East nq. wAT[7t u:VEL dry TIME TIME TIME 1400 rI I 07,15 1010 GATE 2/14/92 I I S OAT/14/92 0Ar( DATUM NGVD ELEVATION I CASING DEPTH , 2 2/14/92 DRILL PIG CME-35 SURFACE CONOmONS field ANGLE 90 BEARING NA SAMPLE HAMMER NA m TEST RESULTS 5,6 di `W 31E1?oZ Wly�. \ 6AND " J $AMPLE NUMBER DESCRIPTIC!u OF MATERIAL < W & C �,, 3 \i � OS M wW - 18 K a _ vi�O� 4 5 _ F: -I CS — 31 - 32 - 33 — 34 — 35 — 36 - 37 — 3E — 39 -- 40 - 41 — 42 - 43 - 44 Tow depth • 105' ��- - -- - r - — - - - SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE NAME AND LOCATION i DRILLING MLTioD: 3.23' ID. 7.23' CD I OGRwG NO. MOLLCW STEM AUGER GT-p SNEET WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION SAMRUNG METM0O: CONTINUOUS SAMPLE BARREL 1 or 3 CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL GREELEY. DaMWNG COLORADO START FNMA Northing, Costing, WATER Lea). 1 dry NNE Tim( TIME 1 1406 1045 1274 DATE 2/14/92 DATE arc DATUM NCVD ELEVATION CASING OE'1M l 1 2/14/92 2/14/93 DRILL RIG CMC-33 View i SURFACE CONDITIONS µGL£ 90 SPARING NA SAMPLE HAMMER NA T[sr RESULTS ^ ti4 _* r-, ��r co(L ��., ?� O& J SAMPLE NUMBER AND DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL .`s a a C 0 a �� is O, M . rcw iV M 3 oi J N g — — — 1 -2 3 (0.0'-30') SYFF, yellowish brown. (10YR 1/4), SILT, Gt1 te Fine Sono, trace Clay strongly colcareous, gy0sun, dry. (ML) O - — — - = — '— -- 4 =s = - 6 - — 8 .. (3A'-7,0') SLFF, yellowish brown, (MYR S/4), SILT, little fine Send, trace Clay, strongly Calcareous, gypsum. dry. (MO (7.0'-7.7') Very loose, yellowish brown. (IOYR 5/6), Fine SAND. trace Silt, strongly calcareous. roots. dry, (SP) 02 Cs — —_ _ - - — — r -. 9 — - 10 — -- 1 1 _ - 12 -- 13 �\ (7.7'-!1.4') Stiff, yellowish brown. own? J/6), \ SILTY LAY and fine SAND, strongly Calcareous, don0. (MC -CL.) N (11,4'-(30') Very loose, yeliow.Sh brown, (10YR 5/6), fine SAND, tone Silt, noncolcareaus. roots. dry, (SM) O C- _ - — - — —_ —_ - — — ^--14 — (13.0'-iS.O') Very loose, yellowish brown. (IOYR 5/W, Raw SAND and SILT. noncalcareous, roots. dry, (SM) 0 CS — — — — — 0 8 ni NI MI O C7 O I >I co C Sc J 931061 SOIL BOREHOLE LOG 517E NAME ANO LOCATION ORIWNO MLTIOD: 3.25' IA 723' CD BORING NO. HOLLOW STEM AUCER GT-6 1 *94a7 JASTE SERVICES CORPORATION SAYPUNC MLTOO; CONTINUOUS SAMPLE BARREL 2 of 3 CENTRAL VELD SANITARY LANDFILL ORRIING GREELEY, COLORADO START FlNISM Northing+ Dating, WATER LEVEL dry } rlMf TIME TPA , 1406 1045 1234 PATE 2/14/921 DATE WE DATUM NGV D CWdAnoS CASING DEPT, I 2/14/92 2/14/92 DRILL RIO CME-55 I SURFACE CONDITIONS Meld ANGLE 90 BEARwO NA I SAMPLE HAMMER NA ffi TEST RESULTS "! ;3 W Ov ,( u: +q J,JJ& �vul4 O SAMPLE NUMBER MO DESCRIPTION OF MATERNL 2 cc A uup C R `N A W K d' W 3V K a - J u n g --.- 16 — = 17 '\v \ N. �' I 4/4),-10.09 Stiff, dark yellowith brown. (10YR a/U. eo Tr CLAY, Mare clop Sand, strongly italCarPpU5, damp, i L -ML) CS --- _ ^ — 18 - 19 — _ 20 — - �_" - (38.0'-21.0') Mghly weathered, extremely weak. brownish yellow..1107R 6/6), fine Silty SANDSTONE noncalcareous, laminated. Iran o,Ide a tolling, dry,— WEATHERED BEDROCK (23.0-21.49 N:yhlyy weathered, extremely weak light olive brown, (2,5Y 5/3), SILTSTONE, noncalcareous. laminnated. dry. WEATHERED BEDROCK (�s CS — _ _ - — 21 — — `,— 22 C C (21.4'-29.0') Mlgnly weathered. extremely weak, brownish e ' yellow, (IOYR 6/6), floAty SANDSTONE noncalcareous. Host, WEATHERED BEDRCCK �� - - - .__.23 — 24 — 25 '.' — 26 — 27 _ (27.0'-25.0') Mghly weathered, extremely weak, brown:Sh yellow, CIOYR 6/6), fine 91ty SANOSTCNC, noncalcareous, most, WEATHERED SECRCCK 25.0'-29,o') Highly weathered, PKtree ly seek. Dove brown (2,5 Y 5/3), fin SANDSTONE and ,nterlonmaUsti SILTSTCNE. n*ACalcareo.e, ran °wade stan.ng, damn, WEATHERED BEDROCK CS — —, —., — _— 28 - — 29 — (29.O'-30.5') Highly weathered extremely weak, '^— alive brown, (2.5 V 5/3), flM SANDSTONE and interiom,nated SILTSTONE nonaalcareOms, iron Oxide ->taming, 60'O, WEATHERED BEDROCK cS — — CC O U U J CD L5 Le, t s -I. C5 laJ CO V O NI mil P, co OO ill m'I y W G poi 'dam W 1. 931061 SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE NAME ANO LOCATION WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION CENTRAL VELD SANITARY LANDFILL GREELEY, COLORADO NORSIIRU0, Casting. DATUM NGVD ELEVATION DRILLING MCN00: 3.25' IA 7.25' OD BORING NO, MULLOv STEM AUGER GI -6 SHEET 5AMVwNG MLTNOO. CONTINUOUS SAMPLE BARREL 3 OE 3 GRILLING I smart riwy, WATER LEVEL dry 1 TIME TIME TIL[ $06 i 1045 234 DATE 2/14/92) PATE am CASING DEPTH I 2/14/92 2/14/92 DRILL RIO CNE-55 SURPACE CONOmoNs field ANGLE 90 BEIRING NA SAMPLE HUMMER NA - TEST RESULTS W� S} 4111 aC Wcf ) a,�., �J ; g in SAMPLE NUMBER AND DESCRIPTION Of M.ATERLAL o ₹ W rr 4 C y .4 g'J L, V n V 2 2W x - a o J N Z Is —31 — 32 —33 - Sa - 35 — 36 -37 — 38 —39 —4.0 - 41 — 42 — 43 =- 44 t0 aea!n 30.5' _ - - - - - - " =', - _ - - 7.I a Z 8 0 z 07 0 Lal C 931061 SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE NAME ANO LOCATION I DRILLING 14EMOD: 3.27" ID, 725' OD . BORING N0. HOLLOW STEM AUGER GT-7 SHEET WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION SAMOUND LcTWO: cONr;MJCUS Smote BARREL I DF 2 CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL CwwNG GREELEY, crLCRADO sun nwsH Northing, 371.634,40 CARtag, 2393.784.89 RATER LEVEL 20.3' I nig nut 1 nl(E 8.5 ; 743 843 DATE 3/27/9 DATE WE DATUM NGVD ELEVADoN 4793.41 CASING DEPTH I, 3/27/92 3/27/92 DRILL RIG CME-55 SURKAGE CONDITIONS drY/sparse grass ANGLE 90 BGR,NC NA i SAMPLE HAMMER NA - E MOWS/1OOT CKt CASING TEST RESULTS G— Ls KZ T W aircr. Wr ,qi'5 I,' 20 SAMPLE NUMBER D DESCRIPTIONAOrMATERIAL i a ,C ,= lit - q 7 i 3(.1 M' o - LD N —1 -"Ai I ' (C.C'-S.5') St,FF, brownish yeller, COYR 6/6), j CLAYEY SILT, CeiCereovs. roots, demo (ML) I (13-2,0') SrFF, yellowish brown. (1OYR 5/4), 1 - - _ 2 -, - A ::',--T CLAY, caLcoreous. dan0. (CL) (2.0'-3.0') Higrly weathered, extremely weak. dark yeliowish orange, (10YR 6/6), silty Fine SANDSTONE. weakly laminated, noncalcareo,s, eon oxide sta'n'n4 9110,54 WEATHERED BEDROCK C. -- 3 4• — 5 — 5 C — 7 (3.0'-9O') Nighty weathered, extr.s.y weak, dark yellowish orange. BM 6/6) and neck., dark ray,- (N4), saty ca! SANDSTONE ,nterlonneted with CLAYSTONE, nonCaltareous. gypsum damp. WEATHERED BEDROCK /1 CS � �, - - -- — — _ 8 - - 9 to - - 11 12 (8.0'-13.0') Highly weathered, extremely weak. dark _ gray, (N3) and dark yellowish orange. (1OYR 6/6), - - CLAYSTONE ,nterlosnated with silty Foe SANDSTONE. - - noncolaoreous. 9YDSMn, dan0. VEATHERED BEDROCK - - -907. CLAYSTONE == -_ — — (13.0'-1&09 Mghly weak dark o CS — — - - — 13 --14 weathered, extremely -_ _ gray, (N3) and 'Jerk yellowish Orangq (10YR 6/6), _-_ CLAYSTCNE ,nterla m.gted with silty Fine SANDSTONE. noncalcarrous, gypsw, damp, WEATHERED BEDROCK -' _ _ X60% CLAYSTOIIC _ _ ® C. — -, _ ai z wit Lo O C O Z C 931061 SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE NAME AN0 LOCATION WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL GREELEY, COLORADO Nor<hYhgi 371434.40 Eosting, 2193.784.89 DATUM NGVD ELEVATION 4795.41 ORILUNC METHOD: 325' 10. 7.25' OD 4 OORINc m10. HOLLOW STEM AUGER j (I-7 SHEET sAMPUNc METKO: ccNr[Nuot1S SAMPLE BARREL 2 of a I DRIwNC I START F1MSM WATTR tCV 203' I I - TIME TIME Rue 845 745 043 GTE 3/27/92 GTE WE CASING DCPT+ I I 3/27/92 3/27/92 DRILL RIC CME-57 SURFACE CONomoNS dry/sparse grass ANGLE 90 BEARING NA I SAMPLE HAMMER NA I Blow/ 4Jtl. ON SAMPLER (RECOVERY) TC5T RESULTS 3 t F J V SAMPLE NUMBER ANO DESCRIPTION OF IMTERML o �{ 'a `2 t v1 at 3 K - W �, .h1 K "i-, o r is Y j} V L E 1 17 -- -- _ —_ —18 -_+'. 19 T 20 - 21 - 22 <18.0'-23.0') Highly weathered, extremely week, dark gray, <N3) and dark yellowish orange. (1OYR 6/6). -- CLAYSTONE NterlanMoted with silty ciao SANDSTONE, noncalcareous, gypsum. damp, WEATHERED BEDROCK _ - Geodes to t00Y. SANDSTONE =- - — 0 CS -- -. — y — — 23 — 24 25 — 26 — 27 =-28 _ 29 _ Total depth w 23.0' _ — -- —' — R ff 0 LAJ C) r W 931061 APPENDIX B GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL LOGS r2A4i* MAJOR DIVISIONS GRAPHIC SYM6oL GROUP SYMBOL TYPICAL DESCRIPTIONS COARSE GRMMEO solo aolit 'MAO SOX or miatItAL: DIAll MO. 200 Wit 4.i GRAM ""D SOU aSOU cOANZI o. 1 SPX Or REMWag GRAVQS Oa MAN a RIC, • •:..•'.• woven. U L 00 M top •C r . . •COAtE - • • -M-r G p M7aotT-06•00 owes o7A.tt- we moms. urns CO MO INC C*AVts NAM } f `I I? IV PI,- G M ins.-t,e.�, e\kC, • \-1manta G C am GRAMS. -,..o a.. r u , S.MO .MD SAWN Sono5.240.111 LESS nail sot. OM =AM nKfaM so. • wect CtEAI SAND (J.C3 (W„ sx Asfs) •. ••; :•i•• %.. ...... •. SW WOAC.A000 ¶MC$ a.rt4t SA -e; urtt OR MO WC r S O s4 alv[11r ', Silas. WW1 ON NO �wcs SAMS. UfltL SWAIIN FMCS 12y,-, n [S) i. :. 1 : ] i 1 : • S M son.sM.os. SAMc-aT WOWS \: S C nary t 0S. Im.0-Cul vYNRs FlME GRAINED SOILS WOK MAM Sax aR Mo MATERIAL s Ma. zocn SILTS MO la a SO_ GUYS III 1 I I I III ' i I ' / M IMOMiMK MIS amvow MIIL Swan.( rocx nou■. an a Oaln nMt S In of CLAM SRn WM SMWt •.,s,\\.,:. \ , \\ l•• C Ma uMlc 1Ars of LOW ID maim mar*. G4Kt' Mri :WY CUr7. Lan OAK am CAn 0 L I mac an .MO tame an Curs Of LOW n.rTO7r sacs 4,10Ms_, CLAYS , �I ill 1' I. il;, M H IMOEf.LMIc ULM rc.aaui a auroM/Qaat MM( SAM OR SLIT WC C 1,..1 V 1 1 CLAYARC CV14 a NO.IMASMA. Ng CLAYS ni s*oM O H Or.MMC CLAYS Or WL.M. tO MIa MAMA", a sin HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT RAE. MARA. SVM. Soat .IIIM mow oca. car Moth, Ma mRwt MC MCI To MM TrPCS wleAa 10400‘114 74111.C I. ARRVIU.'A rNrSSVK 7IS i s.-637OMt G,pl(�r 1e8 Denver, Colorado mu; SOIL AND ROCK ` CLASSIFICATION CHART Lvpr/PROJECT WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDRLL _ ORAA OPH DMZ JUNE 1992 la NO. 923-2403 Zf, =B JAC js NOT TO SCALEPC M0./Ret ZbSC7tiS CwG IrlN5m Ncti 'Fi rMO. rain- Mo. 9310 SOIL BOREHOLE LOG 511E NAME ANO LOCATION WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL GREELEY, COLORADO Notching. 370.688.26 Costing, 2.193.894.40 DATUM NGVD ELEVATION 4739.49 DPIWNC MEYN00: 7.25' IA 725' OD J BOmVG NO. HOLLOW STEM AUGER GWMW-5N SMEET SMPUNG 4e1400: N/A 1 or 1 DRILLING START Minn MATER LMl 1 I That T1ME 11ME W.2.4 1KI0 QATE ( DATE DATE CASING 00114 I ( 0745 DRILL me CME-55 [ SWAGE CONDf1ONs ANGLE 90 BEARING NA 1 SAMPLE HAMMER 1401b/30' TEST RESMLTS W "tjE3x Z7 rig. aW Q. 45.72 �i }owfr ai x $AMPLE NVNBER AND DESCRIPTION or LATERAL Ri cl a 1 Q o ffi N W,t, S ie — 7 — 2 — 3 4 S - 6 7 8 - 9 --1Q 11 __ -, t 2 -- 13 — 14 No sanoles collected See SCR HoreMole Loci GVMW-12 for ntrotpraolnc inCor-.oton. — — — -'"' - _ _ — 2 2 - h 0 J -J CE d CD W cC7 cc c V a, u,• • 931061 SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE NAME AND LOCATION WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL GREELEY, COLORADO moronity 371.679.09 Eastmg, 219L474.31 DATUM NGVD ELEVATION 477029 ORILUNC METM00: 3.25' ID. 025' DD BORING NO. MCLLCV STEN AUGER G‘dm./-6 I SNEET susumo METHOD: salt s000n (SS> 1 or 2 DRR1dNG START mess WATER LEVEL 9.1' 784E TIM[ Th(C 1100 1030 1215 DATE 2/18/92 I DATE DATE CASINO DEPTN I 1 2/18/92 2/18/92 DRILL RIG CME-53 SURFACE CONDITIONS Slightly nuooy. SDOrce gross ANGLE 90 REARING NA SAMPLE YAMMER 140 Ib/30' Tnt RESULTS W i7 _" 'm;Ca a ;c P+ SAMPLE NUMBER ANO DESCRIPTION Or MATERIAL o: W L ` o -W R - o N g 1 — 2 — S ...� — _ _ 4 _ 5 a 6 12 I (4,0'-3,3') St,PP, yellowish brown (I0YR S/61. rtrapfurtl CLAYEY SILT, tittle E Sond, 9YP*u^• �'y— Interbvds of Clay, ntnC6lcareous, <MU SS �. - - <4764.3> 6.0 — 0 o o 6 —" _ — 7 — 23 50/6' IIr :,� p� ;L/`I/.Y�I (6.3'-8.0') Loose, yellowish brown, (10YR 5/6), unstrat:net• F. SAND. sons Sat. little Cloy. lenses of Clay, nolst. Ilancalcareous. (SW) SS �� ciao .8 — 9 `10 23 3 3' ler a°e° • p /I(e ) (9.0'-f0.S') LOOSe, yellowish b.'O.wA <IDYR y/6). r v unscratlfleo. F. SAND• sore Sat. tittle Cloy l Mss! Of Cloy, wet, nOeCaiCareous, (ST) (4739,8) 10.3 $5 0 0 0 30/4' : ; . (10.5'-11.39 Highly extremely weak. SS ^— 11 �Y. (1101! . weathered brownish yellow. (10YR 6/6), silty I. SANDSTONE. lbMno ted nn oCOlgareOus, Iron Oxide staining 50/6' .,::� vEATMERF`D BEDROCK SS 12 — - 13 -14 tows (113'-19.0') Mighty weathered, extrm*1y weak, brownish yellow, <1OYR 6/6) silty I. SANDSTONE, laminated, noncatCCareou . iron Oxide staxsng,— vEATMERED BEDROCK _ - Z 0 U O —J —J (ti 5— O C W V (,� ( 8 0 P 2 C cc at co CA 0 CD W 0 O Flit -NAME: __cyr+v-s 931061 SOIL BOREHOLE LOG Sat NAME MO LOCATION WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL GREELEY, COLORADO Northing 37L679.09 CnSWV 2,191,474.31 DATUM NGVD ELEVATION 477029 ORIWNC METHOD: 127' 1A 8.2r CD I GORING NO. MOLLOV STEM AUGER GVMV-6 SHEET sAMPUNG am: salt soaon (SS) 2 or 2 ORRIINC I START rm$N *VW Lt1/81 8.1' TIME TIME TIME 1100 1030 1213 OATC 12/18/92 DATE DATE CASO4G We". 2/18/92 2/18/92 DRILL RIG CME•D3 SURfACt coNomoNS sl10ntly nuday, soarse grass ANGLE 90 SEARING NA SAMPLE HAMMER 140 b/30' TEST RESULT'S its ir W a:- .zr q? O lE3s' SAMPLE KAISER AND5!j DESCRIPTION or MATERIAL ₹ S 6 w p. 4 y U. T Y O M e w yu K - o R 1,4 i N S 2 5 —16 —17 — 18 — I)' I C[9.0•-30.0•) H;ahly wfntMMed extrfnAY weak. browcwsh yellow, c10YR 6/6), s;ty P. SANDSTONE, IS --" ... - -- 2D 21 — 22 — 23 I noncalcdreoua. eon oxide staltxg WEATHERED BEDROCK _ 2d — SO/5' Z SS_ _ —25 - 26 — 27 -_ 28 Sr aamo _ 29 50/5' ST® SS E, - yn TOTAL DEPTH * 30.0' z v -K CD U 8 Y V aa 0 931061 • • SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE NAME MO LOCATION WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL GREELEY, COLORADOSTART 371149.74 Eosrngl 2.192.062.63 DATUM NGVD ELEVA11ON 4761.41 DRILLING METMOO: 323• IA 7.21. OD BORING No. MOLLDV STEM AUGER GWMW-7 VIEET WIPING METM0O, epee spoon CSS) 1 OF 2 (*flume "ISSNNorthing. mateLNCy 19.1 TIMEnME Ta1E 943 842 1000 DATE 2/17/92; DATE DATE CASING DfPD4 2/17/92 2/17/92 DRILL RIG CME'35 SURFACE CotOmON4 ANGLE 90 REARING NA SAMPLE KAMMER 140 lb/30' DEPTH N FEET (ELEVATION) *CST RESULTS e6> i �. Q88, i SAMPLE NUMBER AND ocscRIP"ION OF MATERIAL Z „a, Re § '13 g� �7 " m („ R r ,-Y 38 R 2 y, J ,..1 Ir = ?� b — 1 — 2 4 — - _ 6 7 7 17 23 nomo , : ,,II/,1 (4.0'-5.3') loose, yellowish brown, (10YR 5/6), 1 /'L/ strattFley, F. SAND, so.. SAt, little Clay, dry, //1 JI/1`I�I iron oxde stawng, non�Caltoreo.s, (Sin) ___ (4754.I) 7.3 - g 9 __ _- — - 40 50/3' y //�� {�y�1v./ (9.0'-10.3") Loose, Sark yellowish brown (10Y4 4/6), steatite,* SILL sop. E. Sand urn* Clay, :Ton oxide staining, nonc lcareous, wet, (MU �- SS 0 e -'-10 �� 11 E 12 t� \r (4749,0 23 - - I P 13 - 14 24 50/5' Z - - 14 new •,•. )[ fie 0'-15.5') Loose. yellowish brown, YR 5/6), V U CIO SAND, trace Clay, noncc(careous, wet (SV) `_ SS , - C U 1, 9J N PI z 03 C '4 a CHK'O BY _v. "EASE w "I W wC Q 931061 . SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE %ANC AND LOCATION WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL GREELEY, COLORADO NDrthnD, 771.149,74 Cast:Av 2,192062,63 DATUM MGVO ELEVATION 4761.41 ORILING MEM1IOD: 323' IE 7.23' OD a0RiN0 NO. MOLLW STEM AUGER GVMV-7 SMELT SAMIRINC METM00: spit s000A (m 2 of 2 CRLUN0 START NCH WATER LEVU 19.1 TIME RAC TIME I 943 942 100D GATE 2/17/92 WEMIE CASING DEPTH 12/17/92 2/17/92 DRILL RIG CME-33 SURFACE GNOMONS ANGLE 90 BEARING NA SAMPLE MA 140 Ib/00' BLOWS/FOOT ON CASMG ITV RESu1T5 W Xt 4_. 8 W w e� .... 0 SAMPLE NUMBER AND DESCRIPTION OF IMTERLL W M QY le o J, N - — 16 -- 17 - I8 C: (19.0'-20.3') Loos, yellowish brows, (10'R 5/6), — o 9 o 19 — 43 50/2' 4 SAND, trace Clay, Aonca(CareoiA% wet (SW) SS — 20 — 2t —22 _ - 23 + ao® _ 24 (24.0'-25.3') Loose, yellowish crown. (ICYR 3/6). ^�'�' 2S 30/2'� r r "e" SAND. trace Cloy, noncGtcareous. wet (SW) -. E — 26 27 -25 — 29 — - _ W J a Z O U C J J C Z m VC a cc 931061 SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE NAME AND LOCATION WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION CENTRAL VELD SANITARY LANDFILL GREELEY, COLORADO Northing 373232.05 Castng. 2.19L496.14 DATUM NGVD ELEVATION 401.74 DRILLING ML'R400: 3,25' II 7.25. OD 1 BONeCC mo. MCLLOV STCM AUGER GVMW-8 Is4r SAMPLING NETI(OD; split shoOn (SS) 1 or 3 ORRIING START FRSSM WATER LCYEI 210' Taff 1111E TIME 1600 1230 1730 DATE 3/11/92 GATE DATE CASING OEPM 3/4/92 3/4/92 DRILL RIC CME-55 SURFACE CONDITIONS very muddy ANCaE 90 BEARING NA SAMPLE MAMMER 140 lb/30' (NOt1YA313) 1331 M 111430 a TEST RESULTS rc„ Rg v} 3u O 5N $AMPLE NUMBER AND DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL oc5, 3 4/l L §? \a ca Ns O 83 te ` ¢„ L ,' 3' x O 4 W 'A g — 1 2 3 —r 4 ; �� -_ _ — — 3 4 6 7 T9Y clam (4,5'-6-0') Loose, moderate yellowish brown, (10YR 5/4), wnstratIFled CLAYEY SILT, calcareous, some Fine Sand, dry. gypsum. (CL -ML) _. p 0 0 ` 6 r I \ 1\ + (48239) 70 a 9 \\ — J 10 -11NOLO J' 4 \ I\:/ (9.5'-140') Loose, moderate yellowish broM (10YR 5/4), unstratfied CLAYEY SILT, calcareous. little Sono gypsum. wet, (CL -ML) SS 0 0 0 M 12am 13 — 2 lir I9Y 11 \14 <14.5'-16.0') Loose, moderate yellowish b.'04 (10YR 5/4), CLAYEY SILT. little .-.�.. _ T— mop )(JO3 wnstratlfied Calcareous, Sand. gypsum. damp, (CL-MLI SS — 0 0 0 N z La )- 0 8 n N UN O z co 0 Cf ICO BY v. FL1ENAAE: _wnlv-$ 931061 SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE NAME ANO LOCATION WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL GREELEY, COLORADO NortNag. 373,232.03 EastMQ, a191,496.141600 DATUM NGVD ELEVATION 4931.74 ORILLNG METN00: 323' ID, 7.23' OD BORING NO. MOLLOY STEN AVGER i GVMV-8 I SHEET SAMaING IClO0: sort spoon (SS) 2 of 3 ONkwNG START onas4 wrote l.Ev4 21A' ' 1 TIME 1111E TIME 1270 I7J0 DATE 3/11/92 GATE OATS CASING DE'TN 3/4/9? 3/4/92 DRILL RIG CNE-33 I SVRFACE cowman very muddy ANGLE 90 BFJ,RINC MA SAMPLE HAMMER I40 b/30' In TEST RESULTS Yr 1".W,... zi F.W ,as" tiwl= .pSa ; Oz doh G SAMPLE NVMBER ANDr DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL 0z < u W c 88 \ � �� K i ,C5, ...I <xy 'ZV K 3 It J „-I J VI 1 Z 2 3 _ iS 17 — 18 _ 19 I _ _ — 0 0 0 _ — 'ZD 3 1r Mw \ \\ 4 <19.3'.21.0') loose, moderate yell0WIsr brown <IOYR 5/4), unstrttIFlea CLAYEY SILT, CUICa.rtous. Little Sand, m. dap. (CL -ML) mp. I Ss - • — _ -21 - 22 _ 23 24 \ _, _ - — -25 _ 0 1 I 1R' '_, ID ID' ammo \ \\ \\\\ n 4.5'-26.0') Loe, moderate yaltow.sn brown, (IOYR 3 ¢ Loose. O 514), uAstratVmed CLAYEY SILT. calCc'.r►OMs, little Bond, gypsum. damp, (CL -NI.) SS — _ o b a 26 '--' 27 — 28 — 29 — I 1 19'_ � \\ \\ ,^ 29.3'-31.0') Loose, moderate yellowmsn brown, <1OYR 5/4), unstratiFletl CLAYEY SILT. calt''reaus, little ._a � — _ _ — — — 1 own, \ 6 Sand, gypsum, pomp, <CL -MU SS — —. W a OD cC7 N a cc 0 3 CC CIOK'D BY —v FILENAME: _cvHv_e 931061 • SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE NAME AND LOCATION WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL GREELEY, COLORADO Northing 773.232.03 Eastingl 2,19L496.14 DATUM NGVD ELEVATION 4831.74 DRILLING 4E1)<00: 323" IA 725. OD DORwG N0. k0LLOV :1104 AUGER GWHY-8 SHEET sAMvuNG METNOO: split spoon <:S) 3 cc 5 I oRR.UNc START FINCH WATER WAG 21.0' ' I DYETIME TIME 1600 a 1230 1730 DATE 13/11/921 DATE CATE CASNG 0O11WI r 3/4/Q 3/4/92 GRILL RIG CME-33 SURFACE CONOIONS very 'nay ANGLE 90 BEARING NA SAMPLE HAMMER 140 Ib/30' g TEST RESULTS ; 2w 2:uN in $AMPI µNOU40ER DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL O W C C g N 3v IN s K 4 _ /�\, ki; Eji 32 --- 33 - 34 \ 1 \ (4797.2) 34.5 _ -- _ C_ 35 _ - 36 4 0 14 { 4: ammo 7 034.3'-36.0') Highly weathered, extremely weak, moderate yel%ow.I 'brawn (10TR 5/4), tkty f. SANDSTONE, noncalcareous, laminated. iron oxide staining, WEATHERED BEDROCK tS- — 37 — 38 —39 _ :. — L — 1 — — — — 40 18 50/5' Sr } JV (39,t-41.0') Highly weathered, extremely weak, O interbedded moderate yellowish brown, (10YR 5/4). silty P. SANDSTONE and moderate dark gray, (N4), CLAYSTONC Z eonoxide staining, SS 41 !-- 42 - 43 44 - aoor� 18 2t. Is,nterbedded :`^ :::. yr _� - _ 2 i r'. WEATHERED BEDROCK (44.7'-46.0') Highly weathered, extremely weak, moderate yellow brown, (IOYR 5/4), silty P. SANDSTONE and moderate dark gray, (N4). CLAYSTONE. noncalcareous, iron oxide staining. J — = _ dwao : - vEATHERED BEDROCK SS N or Ci co X V z -5 0 CD i w J Q of NI 5 O if 931061 SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE NAME AND LOCATION WASTE SERVICES CCRPCRATIDN CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL GREELEY, COLORADO Northx+x 373,23205 Casting, 2,191.496,14 DATUM NGVD ELEVATION 4031.74 ORIWNG METN00. 3.25' tD, 7.25. OD oORnIG NO. HOLLOW STEN AUGER GVMW' 8 SHEET SAMPUNC METHOD. 'split soon (SS) 4 of 5 coup* nosy 1 nwyl WATER LEVEL 1 21.0' TIME TIME TIME 1. 1600 1230 1770 OAR 3/11/921 PATE WE CASING DEPTH 13/4/92 i 3/4/92 DRILL RIC CME'55 I SURFACE CONWfCNS eery nudely ANQE 90 REAPING NA SAMPLE HAMMER 140 lb/30' TEST RESULTS rc.• r„r� Et* za �. fi d8`-' N SAMPLE NVMOER AND DESCRIPTION CF MATERIAL ca d, w i W 1-`12� �< OZ ffi M Wf, 3V K 2- J N nr -- 47 48 —49 _ _ _ _ — 50 5 26 50/2' �A_ - 0 (49.5'-31.0') NIOhly weathered, extremely weak. Interbedded moderate y.o+ own. tUbrown. (10YR 5/4), silty I. SANDSTONE and moderate dark pray. (N4), SS _ -•• — 51 _ - 52 —53 - 54 4 amw — �� — - CLAYSTCNE. noncalcareocs, Iran oxide StanNQ. WEATHERED BEDROCK ^� _ - _ _ - — 55 36 30/4' __ 11da-, �;,` a j X ❑ <54S-56.0') NlgMY weathered, extremely weak, Interbedded noderate yellow brawn. (LOYR S/4). silty f. SANDSTONE ow moderate dark grey, <NA). SS— - _ $6 57 — Sg - -- - 59 ,- awea 30/6' 50/2' 4' =� — CLAVSTONE, noncalcar.'Oas Iron oxide wtom✓g, WEATHERED DEDROCI< • (59.5'-61,0') Highly weathered, extremely weak. tterbedded moderate yellov,sh brawn. <IOVR S/4), silty F. SANDSTONE and notlerate dark gray, (NA). CLAYSTONE. nOncalcareou1, ton oxide staining, _ _ _ _ , _ _ (1a04 . ,- l2 WEATHERED BEDROCK SS -I cc Z C v <7 Z J O CC ' CC 931061 SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE NAME AN0 LOCATION WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL GREELEY, COLORADO Nortnw.o. 373,232.03 Eosting. 2.191496,14 wtuM NGvC ELEVATOR 4831.74 ORIUJNC 1407400: 3.23' W. 723' CD BORING NO, MCLLCV STEM AUGER GVMW-8 j SHEET SAMPLING MCT)400: soot c000n (SS) 3 OF 3 ORIWNG START TINISN WATER LEVEL 21.0' _ TAE TIME TIUE 1600 1230 1730 OATS 3/11/92 I PATE °Ate CASING DEPTH ( ± 3/4/92 3/4/92 ORIu a1C CME-33 SURFACE CONOmONs very nMaay ANGLE 90 REARING NA SAMPLE HAMMER 140 lb/30' Saw/ Is ON SAMPLER (RECOVERY) ' TEST R[SVLTS n^ _ xJ $' SAMPLE NVMBER ANO DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL a: p+ G $� Tu M i #6 K "" v. — 61 — 62 :. f- 62.8 — — 63 -- 64 s'-'• 65 -- 66 -- _- — —(4768.9) (64.3'-66.07 noderotely weathered very weak. dark gray, (N4), silty F. SANDSTONE, WEATHERED BCDRCCK _ - — 67 _ X68 —69 - 70 —71 -- 72 -- 73 - 74 SEE ROCK CORE LCG 63,0'-90A' — _ _ -1E —: RECORD OF DRILLHOLE GWMW-Oa Prat 1 r 1 mac Q4TTMLwaw soma tCCh40Q an IIpTAarCOR[ NXfl*CCrE DATW: N94 COtAM Ott 4131,79 9150.ISCT c 913.400 DI ILOS 0A1s 37692 =Cat ATfi 74371.222.05 IL 2PN6414 {OCATCN: WC" CO mum: Ca Amount. 910.844709 .0 ROOS716hE Asa IL w fVY4Ye Mai Caned a.a.._4 aSw 94NYarr'i n' 94544944WWI466a starpro M114.40,mace/444h.+ Meg. c• o3 @ 1V2s'221frdd<2t S w 9 aEs 3 '� 2 4 R.II8 G 91P011i! W WATER S INS11RA4017ATUN in 8 Nf. R'/ 4YA to Y ¢ 8 TYPE MO OlrfaG YYSE I SS oernmo4h g • to • .• IT r >h . 73 ' '• 76 - n . n • n . 42 `1. •4667.„A e a 3DIFIFT. • SSJ.PLK 3 DIP/FT, • 4 OIFLS FT. • sys�,,l1Cpgg 4 OW/FT. • ;.. ;� , G i £ n 3. Cal bras Oceano( era Sande *I 65.51.8.5• . S111pfa *7 706712 743.70.8 - (0.O 5.See 0) SSoil &rendmW 109 8909 coring t MO' hMW 3) SCOW 4761,74 1 7. � s (eS672wee . veiy weak 1110697.19 990944991009911. (IOYN 7/4) b inedium dark p1ay, line SANDSTONE, osr16aa thy. Interbedded Geysers Geysers Am 74 II A LL sHr @ i f2Y ' r-a� k^ i'- / 8 70.0.70.8' N9 (9009.y 7900 474'7.64 900 4766.94 L Mao 72.5.729' weathered zone 72¢ne r 716' Clay.$0above (73.9.754) Slightly writhe/ed.. wry week, talk yellowish brown. (Ia slightly Ma SANDSTONE (76,4.73.6) SaOhay vary week dark yy.4e1IC...hbrown (10YR 4/2), LONE 45194 rap 473.,04 7240 4774.34 0 13.40 475994 ♦ w 7360 4 14 S 71 h', 47 Am, 04weather a 04 !Y 7560 4771.94 7 er TOTAL OEPTH • 794 Ft n'p • OW/FT . approximate wwnbar a ORI W NO INOUCED FRACTUR per bat ES moo CarolstAtE: r.2.3 a, w. Golder Associates p coirmaoit Ca,,,ND EN0145PDADthe ONu).a7! MCC TIMERS DATE e1Ta. r SOIL BOREHOLE LOG Is SIYE NAME ANO LOCATION WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL GREELEY, COLORADO Northing, 373.248.70 Casting 2.192.751.38 DATUM NGVD ELEVATION 4836.22 DRILLING uITN00: 325' ID. 7.25' OD 808,4 NO. HOLLOW STEM AUGER ' GWMV-9 SNEET SaMPUNc METOODI salt spoon (SS) 1 of 3 oEn(awc START FW94 WATER LMS. '20' MOLE tale TIME 730 1300 1630 O*TE 2/26/9 DAME DATE CASING OOem 2/24/92 2/26/92 DRILL RIG CME-55 SURrACE CONOTOONS muddy, non -vegetated ANGLE 90 BEARING NA SIMPLE MANNER 140 0/30' rd TEST RESULTS ` 2 a q p �o itub� ASAMPLE �¢` N040um6ER DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL�.�i { G t.v� �$ N vz ati ,y x z S - 1 - 2 s 4 - -"' '"- _ J a o o S - - 6 _- 7 - 2 2 2 IH (Wan (a.3'-6.0') sr,Ff dark brown (tOYR 3/3), I t unstretlfled. CLAYEY SILT. some F. Sand. no:at. nOncalCareouS. OIL) (4828.4) 7.8 SS 4." - - - — - _ 9 - (9.S -ILO') Loose, brown. (10YR 5/6). -.8 � _ o a o is-_ 10 - -.4S'r 4 12 :0' am* yellowish 2 unstratified SILT, little I. Sand. sole Clay. 'cost, I Calcareous. (ML) SS -. - 11 - 12 - - (4823.4) 12.8 - - 13 - 14 - 25 30/3' (14,5'-16.0') Very loose, brownish yellow, (10TR 6/6). XI��/ unstratlfled r, SAND. some Sat trace Clay. damp. <S'0 U` " — _ - - 0 0 0 S m O W U 8 af a nl YI C NC O a C C 931061 SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE NAME AND LOCATION DRIWNG uCIW0: J23' ID. 7.23' CD OORING NO. NCILLOV STEM AUGER GWMW-9 SNEET WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION sANPUNc Artnec: sOlit spoon <SS) a Of 3 CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL OlinwsG GREELEY, COLORADO START f1NISM Northing 373248.78 Eoebaww 2192731.38 wA10! It111 • O' 11 I 1 TIME TIME TIM 730 t I 1303 1630 OAT[ 2/26/92 DATE DATE DAMN NGVO ELEVATION 4836.22 CASING DEPTH 2/24/92 2/26/92 GRILL RIG CME-03 SURFACE CONOfIONs muddy. non -vegetated ANGLE 90 BEARING NA SAMPLE NAMMER 140 Ib/30' 1. TEST RESUIT5 En zSAMPLE Q. . 4WL� vvvlll '[ hO4 NVNBER ANO OESCRiPnON OF MATERML 3• at W 3 C C 5y- 3{ p Cy ` " du m y W `g SQ M a o W "' r 3 = -- 16 - 17 — IJ (4810.4) 17.9 — — -- 18 - 19 -- - -... 20 — — 23 40 30/J' `� /,\1 4 <19.3'-21,0') Very loose. brownish yello.. (1OYR 6/6). anstraafled F. SAND. Little sat, none LcGreot,L rot, GSM) ?S -, 0 a 0 -21 22 — vt= (4813.4) 22.8 -_ _ _t -- 23 - zs — 25 - TO 36 30/4' + , 3 (24.3'26.0') Very loose, brownish yellow, <10YR 6/6), unstrdtivled f. SAND. tittle Sit nonCalCGreous, wet, iron oxide stGMMAQ, (SM) �— SS — - — — 26 — 27 amw C4800.4) 27.8 — r — — 29 13 ' w� \ \ (29.3'-31.0') Very loose. brownish yellow. (IOYR 6/6), unstratifled F. SAND, Uttte Sit. nonCaleareout. wet, iron oxide :time' and interbedded stiff. dark yellowish brown. <IOYR 3/6), — - '� - 29 29 W `� 6 SILTY CLAY, nOacolcareoue, wet. CSM-Cl.) SS - — SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE NAME AND I.OGAnON WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL GREELEY, COLORADO Nortnng. 373248.78 Eoliths,. 2,192,731.39 DATUM NGVD tt ./ATON 423422 DRILLING WNW: 32r IA 7.25' OD WRING No. HOLLOv STEM AU Avast GVMV-9 SHEET sAMPUNC MHD100: salt spoon (SS) I 3 or 3 artisan rime j must. *AM,20• Twe NICE£olit me 730 1300 1630 are 2/24/921 J GATE aye CASING DEPTH 2/24/92 2/26/92 DRILL RIG CME-55 ' SURFACE CONOMONS PLicklIlL IIGe-vegetAtrd ANCtC 90 SEARING NA SAMPLE HAMMER 140 lb/GO' 8Ww/ La ON SAUPt.ER (RECCNEAY) TEST RESULTS 9 _5AuPLE 0.� dV g NUMBER AND DESCRIPTION OF MATERNI ₹ cc a rY L 4 \� Via � 6 M �r 3cZ k t J J N 21 3 — 3fri <I0bp I��'� SS — 31 - 32 - 33 -- 34 - 36 --37 — 38 —M -41 - 42 —45 .+ 44 -•1 SEE RECORD OF DRILL HOLE FOR 30'-70' - — - - — - 1 - — — — ci C U 7 I V 931061 RECORD OF DRILLHOLE GWMW-09 tram 1 al :. MAIM. CS4TR&&wat: 1101•.O LISTMA CTMVCOR NJl7TfaCONE altwe a. COWS San eata92 PROJECT NO: .1aiem a.uwooari: 2 c ,.-al nN:o712.s.7s tzalmza LOCATION: ORlir, CO C94.1.1•0: 44e5 - ant aae44n0•e AO 110CK TAT ,14.14•.1 MAW 4.•.w. rIta OQrv.e (S _ a.V 1.1411 .••'c M•wln .aw.1. m+1w.e Mist /ream. 111..• M 1•.{4 111..•1 wig. m �} tZ II F.2122kp2Z2L1 S 1 m ' e }3� YS11$ N rno WATStlaygq aaiRwENrAMON F paSCArt10N 8 OIsOQnnvvrn 0$7A Ea i iie AMMO y�y 1au•M Y i� °A Z 9 =ISE 2 1 S - s! 2 5 1 ww.ca Omacarrof 8 , >z ' ' y - y -. ' . 4. Y .NI r I A I ES.I.R.PRa••a11 - sx q j7' 1 • 'fC - ;� ' ' . 34•.7'1 - ' ' Sample IT - - sump. /2 46547.0' sandno•r Sadie 1.1 47._460' _Snw1ypn.. �elll Clay WSW .1[.9011420' - (0.03So) sea sod sa.nosOO°O bg Begin owing .l 3S.O' &can 10YR 6/69 loo auk y.IIowrh brown. (1OrN N-0. SANDedded CUYST0NE and Ma SANDSTONE norlu)ureoos, dry very inw.npeterrt (46247.3) saoh1N l yelloonsh orange. ryOrh a/a), salty fine SANDSTONE nwloab.11011.. dump 47.549.0' Clay 4nwt W. fens clay 4110,72 , - 40.30 17942 a 1e 479472 7Q r- 44703si 4793.42 4 1e Y'20 CCp. 72 a NO .z.5.5 17.722 a no •w,aoInterbsda 7 to Mr i SCALE 1•rzr LOOSED. J. CAPONS CANrnAGTac DAWNS 97+ON8 DIE'(; W. NEIVIT Golder Associates OAKUM R Gf Ao0F7t8 DATE 31061 RECORD OF DRILLNOLE GWMW-09 Val 2 u 3 PROaCT; COMM.WRD 104243 Nl11r00: An IOCVry cola NUTACONE anaa a COLLAR aar. .IOaa .110.c NO N33ga Gaup OAt Wad 0:00rang it 372204.70 t 2i27S13! LOCATION: OAmEY, CO COL, NIL Clam ant NCcinto. 40 F[Q u� 2OCriMPS MAW Mend 0Orw• as {Hints term rase r4.99.93 wMY. ...r 11•o _ j g q ! aaa2 - CC a 2s1$$ '2222 < 2 N0159 wA1FALiY61 IN NITtiTA770M OE7C�M�10N 8 Alen NY Geode 94•431RI IalislaN I q It 6 eao 2212 $pj Y SS _ N1ffN aT,, I • 5 2 s * TIRAko ..o ca to , ov1N - z 77 3t .. 56 Y ♦ . ap as - ! - ® A •7'}4 . Y TO i 14 OiF/FT.• FYE 'i ieS € iNl- • >f" zjka :r. t".% ii Cy .. N wr.at about SO Swale t4 G.1 -e26' Cray SandMOne Sample sr3 045.413' pray Sandstone - .. - r - -.CFTM 30.740.0' No r.00.ery 070 •77? 22 ,32 '" PO .m Sj (30.049.07 Sllgmdy 30.00 weathered, wank. medium darks". gqrreayy. (NA). saw nn. SANOSTONE. nam.loareorw. pay 4r11.1a.. poorly indurated 59.00 ant; a a also .n1 99 . o 140 703 43 10 r .l4Q 11 tm- aam 47073 13 w 0100 13 n SCALE; r-zr LOCOED* 1CAEMEEb OISUJE C CCNMACIOR oa aN0 OCAS o1E0FO: W. Mar fr., Golder Associates Ohwimr. RCK ROGOW at 061 RECORD OF ORIW.HOLE GWMW-O9 a.d J a. a Pat= CliWa al) IORra CC* Pa r107Am CCna NX/7aCONE Cast a anaa sae a= rroWacrua: a73eaa CRWrOC7a: =VIII CCa04A181t07124471 t2.107 76 U7CMC, ORKELEY, CO Crsl RC: *SS A7Wnt datialCrk 40 yg� fCCC77PE Aare Raew 144.41I.+ SRADAe. CO4.4m Name a•wsang WY.AAs s —a. roarer Rasa. E �.UI � a r5. $d 7222*22Z2M _ y a 3 $ 3 2 2'ifl zzq FF z $ NOTESFadden•••••••••K_fly IMIA„cs WI1mRFaNTATION Ca9C�fgM 2222 y ff - __ �,d+nnV.T'Az7A •9$ 1i 2 2 � b OSala tcn . _ . . . - 70 n 74 >r 7p b w b M 0.70.4'C1r�ek0�w nIrtkrteaa tlrk 0r1y. (N7) 72.2.75.0• No nooSert .7etn `?4a m 70 n - 70IFI tt 00111ooeo 74Z an to 75.0' - , - - ma 4784 14 IS MOO 7aao TOTAL DEPTH approximate number • 01F/FT N INDUCED FCINDUCED FRACTURES per toot CON SCJ48: 1t2.Y =GM .1. d IIA anuno aOlnwAciart MILLING ENO IS 0400117: w. Far !l•% Golder Associates MISER: MO( MGM DATE 93106 SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE NAME AND LOCATION WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL GREELEY, COLORADO Northing, 371,940.04 Eartngt 2]93,279,38 OATUM NGVD ELEVATION 4913.70 DRILLING MET' OO; 3.23' In. 7.27' CD BORSJG NO. HOLLOW STEM AUGER GWMW-10 I SHEET suour40 LOW! spot spoon (Sr) 1 of 4 oR uw.: START f1NISH WATER LE/EL 34' I TORE nME TIME 913 I l 900 1900 DATE 3/1/92 OATE art OLSN0 oEPTN { 3/18/92 3/19/92 DRILL RIG CME-33 SURFACE CONDmONs very muddy ANGLE 90 BEARING NA SAMPLE HAMMER 140 0/30' TEST RESULTS L.-- "i iy Ili C 67_, a: \ a w SAMPLE NUMBER AND., DCSCRiP•DON OF MATERIAL p \ M 2 ,zw I. 0 n l `r ti S — -4 • h k — 0 0 0 — - 5 9 14 27 je ° 'L — _— (4.0'-6.3') Highly weathered, extremely weak. perk yellowish orange, (IOYR 6/6), silty P. SANDSTONE with Interbedded, completely weathered. extremely weak. dark yellowish brown, (lOYR 4/2), CLAYSr@1E, --- $$ — — - — 6 - 7 - 8 _ — _ n0nCa1CartOus, damp WEATHERED BEDROCK -- _ - i 9 — -- 70 20 21 21 1B, Tir atm :• L - 2 (9.0'-11.7') H1gmy weathered. extremely weak, park yellowish orange, (10YR 6/6), silty P. SANDSTONE with .nterbetltled Cdnpletely weathered, extremely weak, dark yellowish brown. (10yr 4/'L). CLAYSTONE, noncalcareous, damp, WEATHERED BEDROCK ""� SS -- - - - 11 --- 12 -` — 13 - 20 20 J . - - - -J (14.0'-16.3') Highly weathered, extremely weak. dark yellowish orange. (IOYR 6/6>. silty F. SANDSTONE -ma..- - — - - - 0 b 0 _ _ 14• - 33 I noon - �V A © with Interbedded CJnplete(y weathered. extremely weak. dark yeaowleh brown. QO r 4/2), CLAYSTCNE, noncalcaree, oudamp WEATHER BEDROCK SS - - N 4 F1i[NMIE; _G Nv-io 931061 SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE NAME ANO LOGnGN ORIUJND minion; 323" ID, 723' OD 00Rwic NO. HOLLOW STEM AUGER GWMW-10 $ SMEET WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION SAMPUN0 METHOO: spat spoon ($5) 2 of. 4 CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL GREELEY, COLORADO crwmc START RNTSH NorthRga 371,940,04 Casting. 2,193,27938 NATGR LEVID, 34' nu( OK 114E 915 800 1900 GATE 3/1/92 GATE GATE DATUM NGVD ELEVATION 4813.70 GASeIG DEPTH 3/18/92 3/18/92 DRILL RIG CME-33 suftflEL CONDITIONS very Away ANGLE 90 REARING WA SAMPLE HAMMER 140 Ib/30' TEST RESULTS Y Z. sw 'czv S' 'el i-w 8v f, '^ Wild( M)MaER AN0 DESCRIPTION Of MATERIAL i m cc �+ ` S �7 ' 5 �7 W o5 z CC ,...4 s $ 2 a y m = — 17 - 18 — 19 _25 — 20 21• ^ 22 - 23 Y —24 12 36 1 ayp ' = — 4 (19.0'-2L3') IOoh1y weathered extremely weak. dark yellowish orange, (10YR 6/6). stty F. SANDSTONE with Interbedded Completely weathered, extremely weak, dark yellowish Drown, (10yr 4/2). CLAYSTONE noncalcareous. gqyypsulti ton oxide staNsnp Mono. VCATHERED BEDROCK - — — — _ - 0 0 — — 30 30/4' L /5 124.0'-26.39 Highly weathered. extremely weak, medium/, nedn dark gray, (N4), silty R SANDSTONE Toth interbedded Completely weathered extremely weak, _„ SS : 0 0 0 — 25 ^ 26 ^ 27 = 28 — 29 _ or C10,70 46 50/3' ÷- — - — medium dark gray, (i44), CI,AYSTCPC. nonCalcareous. pypeun, ton oxide staining, fissile, damp WEATHERED BEDROCK (29.3'-29.89 Highly weathered extremely weak. mean dark gray, (N4), Silty 9. SANDSTONE with interbedded completely weathered extremely weak. medium dark gray, !N4), QAY$TCNE noncatcareouw. B gEDR'ron oxide staining. clssse, damp WEATHERED CCK (29,8'-319) Moderately weathered extremely weak, medWn gray, (N3), 4ty 9. SANDSTONE with Atwrbedded completely weathered extremely weak, median dark ray, (N4), CLAYSTDIE, noncatcareouc, 'EATMCRED -mgr., — '- — — 0 0 i 0 _.-- moo .r :fi /� B 6 EDROCK ss - i i 04 V I C C C71 , >i >1 z 931061 SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE MAME ANO LOCATION WASTE SERVICES CCRPCRATTCN CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL GREELEY, CCLCRADC Northing, 37L940.04 Fasting. 2.193.279.38 DATUM NGVD FLEVAT(ON 401170 DRILLING Mallet: 3.23' to 723' 00 BORING NO. MOLLDV STEM AUGER C1.9,41.1-10 SHEET SAMvuNO Cr_ C salt c000h (Sr) 3 or • ORIWkc START FINISH Ware m,0. 34. I - %IC TIME INC 915 800 1S20 PATE 3/V92 I DATE DATE CASINO DEPTH I T 1 3/18/92 3/18/92 DRILL RIG CME-33 SURFACE cONOIhoNs xery nuAdY ANGLE 90 BFARINC NA SAMPLE HAMMER 140 lb/30- a T[SC •rsucr5 B- Z X, § QJ.: woq3 �N 1_' ��v g SAMPLE NUMBER AND OCSCRIPTION OF MATERIAL 3 a iz W y ffi M ¢ u 30 R 4 Z -^ 32. A..v _ //L�1� _ (4791.7) 12.0 32• ` 33 ` _ r ., — 34 30 al-gr — M 35 .— 36 37 —38 — r '� (Kauwith y;r _ - - _— — v (34.0'-36.3') Highly weathered extrynely weak, pork yellowish orange. (IOYR 6/6), silty f. SANDSTONE interbedded. completely weathered. extremely weak. brownish black (3YR 2/1). ELAYSTONE nonfa,Careous gy0sun. Iron oxide 'taming, WEATHERED BEDROCK 0 0 0 0 a 0 - 39 S0/3• .� (39.0'-41.5') Highly weathered 'Abet. sly .eat. 40 —41 �• 42 — 7. 1r (1 010 • - — medium gray (NS) silty F. SANDSTONE npncatcoreous. wet and nterlaTNnated. extremely weak, brownish black (3YR 2/1). OLAYST@IE nonCalCareous, wet. WEATHERED BEDROC3C (44,('-4G.5') Highly weathered extremely weak. medium gray <N5) silty F. SANDSTONE ndncalcoreous. — 44 50/2' .� wet anp :ate -laminated. extremely weak brownish ...no, na® :::;r . o, black, CSYR 2/D. C1AYSTONE noncalcarrouc. wet. WEATHERED BEDROCK CC Z O U C.D O z i 9 1 2 m 931061 cc yN FILENAME: _cvn±! SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE NAME AM0 LOCATION WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL GREELEY, COLORADO Norenupg, 3%940.0A 2193.279.30 DATUM NGVD ELEVATION 401170 0MEN0 I4ETN00; 327 ID. 7.27 00 90RRIC NO. NOLLOV STEM AUGER G\v/MV-10 SHEET SWRUNG LICINOOt gout spoon (55) • of • aRLURG START HASH RATER LEVEL 3✓ TA2 TimeEARWIG. INC 915 900 1900 DATE 3/1/92 I DATE DATE CASING OE7IN 3/18/92 3/18/92 DRILL RIO CME-60 I SURFACE CONDITIONS Re"). ^ARRY ANGLE 90 REARING NA SAMPLE HAMMER 140 Ib/30' It TEST RESULTS 4^ z- 3 `aW W� ct4 oe, ffi6� g g SAMPLE NUMBER AN0 DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL pi 2 u i O \uZ < u ei N zz 7,8 K 3 J ti - -46 { 4C 7 — 48 - 49 50 - 51 — 52 -. 53 — 54 — 55 — 56 — 57 -- 58 59 SEE ROCK CORE LOG 44,0'-60.0' - — — -- — — DRILLING ENGINEER 9 C3 0 931061 RECORD OF DRILLHOLE GWMW-10 Mew a 0 T 'NDADDT. CARING w4D SORSA COO: AM POUR( mt P0t/TRICONE DATUt ML OOtia t6YN: 481170 'war Na enoe01 DNILNO OAT@ Wa40 COORDeAT65N:37W40o4 C 2]042/9.! ILGRON: ORenaY. CO ptLRO: Weis UMW: ►r0UnAT0N: 40 gY, ROCK N+� .are N.war Moses s e+M CQree aera4er $4— Eras mown . minor WAti aO, p3 6y�,( C C 9 E at It ti G ₹ • s flat 12 42 i$ -2212M 'CMenters g $ wC ainU AT10N omCArMN I Ito r Ord` NntijiTV OATA nalan. g Imo 2442 g F. •� �i 4 S i .a °O°Irm 8b - u ' a _ 5n 3 5$ t ' 57 ' 'w en ' - as tl . it .;N b T. 5 N • NO RECOVERY 23 DRIFT." ( to ' ' �r• .q"q(( id (g toe. seep of seer Soma IT 40.3MA' Sandstone Semis 02 551.16.6' (460.10.0) Freak very ...e.6 `w Wry 00 .70..74 r maawn gray, (745), 9ANOSTONE with Interbedded, reek pry week, dark pray. Oa cuYSTONE some won in Sandstone. adds em4Ww tears. 20Ia ` 0.1 .ywan In thickness. 20%°eYsmfe 'Mail (49.030.0) Fresh, vary wea4a. medium gray(N5), silty fine SANDSTONE, norrwkerew 49.00 70 475170 2 ra 6p0.00 550 .733 StemW 4Twerp 3 a (50.030,6) Fresh. yen/ weake0.ed medium gray. (N5), silly fie SANDSTONE wdh interbedded, neon, 'wry weak. dark gray. S. og intONE Oayaw ns oaaa 'Miffing' In °aware possibly due to b % Cis on, norubereous 50% °systons 50,6560' No recovery I 50.e0 4227,10Interbedded. I uar.A.,_ moat) Fresh, (. Sky51.03 elan nes E, msNDSTONgray.vain AM..f� fish. Nee 56aDI w Palk army. IFS. I�ak�aaE C MAD 4212 4 see (50.660.0) Frees. wry reek. medium grey, (NS). my fine SANDSTONE nawagewaw o1J.>4. TOTAL DEPTH _ 60.0 FL eeOO..o0 'OIF/FT.. aproidmate number of DRILLING INDUCED FRACTURES per toot e600 ocnw Arm C• .•_2Sl' LIMED- �.TD�A DtwuNb coffrn.GTOrc petunia CheCr�D. w. Ne eT $y Golder Associates trivar. etXwoern aTe 9310 SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE NAME AN0 LOCATION WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION CENTRAL VELD SANITARY LANDFILL GREELEY, COLORADO Northing, 370.637,79 Casting' $192,380.76 DATUM NGVD Cl2 ATIGN 4734,31 ORIWNG METN00, 323' ID. 723' OD BORING NO, WILLOV STEM AUGER GWMW-11 SMELT SAYPUNG "Cr1OO: split spoon <sr) I or 3 DRILLING START n44SN WAS LEW. 2L0' I TIME TIME TORE 1600 1400 1430 DATE 3/11/92 DATE DATE CASING OEPTN 3/2/92 3/3/92 ORILL RIG CME-55 SURFACE CONDITIONS very muddy ANGLE 90 BEARING NA SAMPLE HAMMER 140 It/30' 1 DEPTH N FEET (FLEvkIiON) 7E ST RESULTS ,�AA 46 ,pe°, Z z- o� g SAMPLE NVUBER AND DESCRIPTION Of mATERML w ✓S! F,A X u R Vu O ffi� M ug }y K �] - '^ 2 r 1 z 3 _ a _ +r S T 0 0 0 Ifr N' I u.3'-6.0') Stiff, yellowish brown. (10YR 3/6). Y unstratified CLAYEY SILT, little fine Sans ;!/111 strOngly calCOreOus, moist. (MI.) SS — 0 0 0 6 7 _ 8 --- 9 (9.5'-1L0') Stiff, yellowish brown (LOYR 3/6), —=I 3 _ 10 _ 11 - 12 - 13 — —14 0 0 N mOr) o O 0 Ie, 1/ 22 unstratittG CLAYEY stir, little Saiu, strongly calCOreous, wet. ML) (14,5'-16.0') StIfC, yellawls» brown hOYR S/6), unstratifled CLAYEY SILT. little Sand. ....-. „4 — - -- — .� o 0 0 — Imo' i/T(3} strongly Calcareous, wet (M.) SS NG ENGINEERS CC A- v C? SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE ^LAME MO LOCATION °KUNO M'..ETHOO: 325• ID. 7.25• OD eORI1C No. GWMW-11 NCLLOV STEM AUGER SWEET 2 of 3 WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION SAMPUNC NCO: sot spoon (SS) CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL Oll„y„G GREELEY, COLORADO START FlNISM Northwp. 370,657,79 Easting' 2.192.380.76 WATERR LEVEL 21.0' ME 1400 OME 1430 TIME 1600 DATE 3/11/92 (LATE 3/2/92 DATE 3/3/92 DATUM NGVD ELEVATION 4754.31 CASINO OEPTN I DRILL RIO CME-53 SURFACE CONDRIDNS very muddy ANGLE 90 MARINO NA SAMPLE HAMMER 140 n/30' DEPTH N ICU (EtEvADON) TEST RESULTS ?3 c• aitc 0' 8 ffi0' SAM µN MBER OESCRIPDON OF MATERIAL 2 < w :L g LO 3 3 82 T A' 0$ M W u 'U N 3 a § a n, s 6 ? — — — 17 -18 79 — - c 0 0 —20 . 21 0 D 1 flis. t a (19.5'-2L0') Stiff, yellowish brown, (1OYR 5/6), unstreafled CLAYEY SILT, little Sam. OYpste4 allghcly calcareous.e<e, (MU SS _— — — 22 23 _— 24 Amu (24.5'-26.09 Stiff, brown, (LOYR 5/6), —� —. — 25 _ 26 D 9' 'IF Dori yellowish slightcaCLAYEY SILT. ctwSand. slightly Calccalcareous.9YDsuM1 wet. (MU0 r Ss - - _ 0 0 —27 — 28 - — 29 _ 1 2 2 3 (29.5'-31.09 Stiff, yellowish brown. C10YR 5/6), CLAYEY SILT, little Sdnd. ---- - _ noov � usstratiFled, my sdghtly CalCC4reOus. Oyoson, wet, (ML) SS CC 0 o c> J_ O z m m 6 L3 ml -i ) 2 (D � 931061 SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE NAME AND LOCATION WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL GREELEY, COLORADO Np TINOEr 370,657.79 EastAV 2392,380.76 DAN4 NGVD ELEVATION 4754.31 DRIWNG uE0400: 325' ID. 7.25' 00 I PORING NO. HOLLOW STEM AUGER I GWMW-11 SHEET SAMPLING UEtHOO: split spoon <SS) 3 of 3 DeIwNG START fTNC)1 WATER LEVEL 21,0' I TIME Taw( TIME 1600 ' 1400 1430 DATE 3/11/92 1 I DATE PATE CASING DEPTH 1 � 3/2/92 3/3/92 DRILL RIG CME-55 SURFACE CONOITWNS very may ANGLE 90 BEARING NA SAMPLE HAMMER 140 0/30' TEST RESULTS ; Yy .'. 'e�'��., gNu ffia $4uP µuOVuBER DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL P ,a.. 0. 5Ct 82 \'2 n." �g , WW la N - - o -.Log i b C- 31 c_— 32 C -- 33 -- 34 — — 0 S- -- = — — — a 0 0 — N" 35 E 2 3 1 tom 1 /`'/ //1J//ll" (34.5'-35.8') Stiff, yellowish brew" (IOYR 5/4). — unstraroflea CLAYEY SILT, Otte Saint slightly catcoreous, 9ypsu., we% (ML) SS - 36 0 O (35.8'-36.5'> HIOMy weathered, extremely weak, - - - 3 3 moderate yellowish brown. (10YR 5/4), sAty f. SANDSTONE. iron ow K10 staining, noncolcorecus. - - - — —37 s. Tr 'ta r�� (9) gypsum, WEATHERED BEDROCK -- SS" — 0 0 0 38 � 2 <36.5'-3&0'> Higley weathered, extremely weak. medium. yellowish brown (10YR 5/4), silty f. SANDSTONE. Iron Oxide staining, nonCalCareaus, — — a gypsum. WEATHERED BEDROCK (4715.8) 38.5 - — - - 39 - 40 -- 41 - 42 - _- 43 — - 44 ) aaw 50/3' .— (44.5'-45.0'> Slightly weathered. weak, nedeun gray, 045), saty f. SANDSTONE. nanCalcoreouw. WEATHERED BEDROCK (4709.8) w.5 - - — — — — — - - — 1D SEC ROCK CORE LOG 45.0'-60,0' -.a- _ ate) — 0 v CO z ,r z tad X 5- C O N 0' CO 0 0 CIIKI) BY v. t[ast 931061 ' RECORD OF DRILLJIOLE GWMW-11 >a..e , > , Mr! CENTRALWC SCSICIASTIlOQ API noreavOWL N7/TICCE OA1Vl1: a =UPI arl. a6A9. Ma= IC: Skew OPIUM° alt 34/011 CDo11D11UIL9 N•. 374067.79 t 2.102300.75 IGCATICN: Man. CO CA.L 14 Calae AlaftrI: e00114A7C0t 40 j OEhIFEST) ADCK otitis rhs. C{A..a Ke••1•••• liiirausing Same.3 rapped AA•.s Nssalw ywy. lire -Q ,5 �i $$ `E s 84 ;YRl$$reg \ aiaak422;22 }3D, NOM WAlNOICWd.9 e'CTRA1WMDON OaC+rnON 8 Alin .su Sens. Sae. ra.r.. °MN0 OT i a .°° YYSR ' D19CCNYINvWCATA •hEat 4Y Y S l anaa an" 32 it. - se - 41 W L„ - n 59 of p.J1 ;lc* al I '.. 5DIF/Fr.• - +9*'5'5C'C%A 'H v.Y %N .y`tkt S". Yt'b' '.Vt'4M.S.r ^Y14Y '^� a 'C.3.�btf'flSSti m!3+k�61+`vi .•i'dS E"' Y YMiW M wv. 'fltl@Rlp'A ""YIiU.^dTgY' Y'S.. r. YF<� � pt+�•vryA Y � ' lessenooanln 563-1.6. 4da4aa• aye 10•i x17,194 Inn at top d run p Sample •2 51.3-51.W oxygen al 20.0% semp.c 36.3-56." aryoen et 249% con to SUS roan aeo.O' ' - - - - (48.000.01 WOO/ e600 V Sien•4 a Vey walkMedia guy, NN 4690 004 el i 40 :'°"- noaSoraa Innat Cieyelp,y celaeoue 57.031.9' Clanton. with SenclitOne Ciyttoass 70% ,})•O0n) os 5•.034.3' ebawee .116..;/1 y,y0 4704.01 2 17 y} 0420 470211 0 w 5120 4101 J1 4 100 S100 • 31 5 r - 5. x ao war e se 5400 ,66-71 7 1r 07. e u -z eu saw 1 • el e6 TOTAL DEPTH - 040 Ft 6400 •OIF/F'r . w (0 dmr. number Of ORIWNO INDUCED FRACTURES pr toot Dt9RN !CAUL 1•-t5 I000W, 1 CmoeFon 01e114140 OON1RAc7OR CnAAaa vale ol.oEO: w. nveT 1. Golder Associates 'Newt nOCC0ERS ale: q'i1 nr e SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE NAME AND LOCATION ORIWNG ME1400: 325' 1D 725' 05 T BORING NO. N0.L0v STEM AUGER I CWNW-IQ SNEET WASTE SERVICES CCRPCRATICN SAMPLING MEYNOO: split soaa.n (SS) 1 of 3 CENTRAL VELD SANITARY LANDFILL CAMLNG GREELEY, CCLCRADC START nrasM Northing( 370.68966 Casting 2,193,901.46 wA1LR LEM 21.0' TaUE TINE TO4E 1600 1330 1845 DATE 3/11/92 DATE DATE DATUM NGVD £LEVATION 4759.40 CASINO DEPTH 2/27/92 3/2/92 DRILL RIG 014E-55 SURFACE CONDTONS eery muddy ANGLE 90 BEARING NA SAMPLE RAMMER 140lb/30' I ' TEST RESULTS W,.., S'< FL 4,� wIx ,ate� s a aliS— N $AMPLE NUMBER AND DESCRIPTION or MATERNL QZ u s 1- p \ " �6 N ��_, a� 3u R 3 j N $ •„ 1 — 2 — <4716,6) 2.0 �: — - — 3 4 _ — 5 6 3 3 3 ,Itr Moon 1 (4.5'-6.0') Loon. dark yellowish brown. t OYR 4/6). Witrotlfied. SILT. sore F. Sand. trace Clay, coal fragments, roots. dry, strongly calcareous, damp.. <Ma S$ �—. — 0 0 0 — 7 — 8 — 9 — 1 0 - 11 2 3 3 e• i4T 0amo '/n 22 <9.5'rIL.O') Loose, dark yeRoersh brown, <lOYR ,/ 4/6), o strongly coic:Fipd s. d some F. Sand, little, Clay, J(IVIII strongly Ca1COre0Ms, damp. (ML) SS - - — — "' o 0 e —12 — (4746,6) 12.8 ^-- - - 13 1 q 2 ' - (14,5'-16.0') Completely weathered. extremely weak, nedh.n yellowish brown, (10YR 5/6). silty F. SANDSTIINE, strongly calcareous, dry, -- -•, 0 SW(— -- 2 gypsum ,--•—..a :::)U vEATNERED ICDRCGK $$ Is z 1 w CD CD 0 v 8 N r 0 C.5 FitENMIE: GVNY-I2 6 931061 SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE NAME AND LOCATION WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL GREELEY, COLORADO NOrthmy 370.669.66 Casting• 2,193,901,46 DATUM NGVD ELEVATION 4759.40 DRILLING MET1p0, 32T 3A 725' O➢ PORING NO. GWMW''2 HOW STEM AUGER LLO SHEET 2 or 3 SAMPUNG METK)0: soot spoon (SS) OROAJNG slot FI..sn ,MAT ILVd 2y,p• I TAE 1330 TIME 18/5 yyE 1600 ( QATE 3/13/92 I PATE 2/27/!2 DATE 3/2/92 CASING DEPTH • I GRILL RIG CME-55 svRPACE CONORIONs very muddy AN0IL 90 BEARING NA SAMPLE HAMMER 14010/30' DEPTH W FEET (ELEYNIOH) 'a TEST RESLRTS 11F i,e 33 ;au -4 g inzz SAMPLC NUMBER ANO DESCRIPTION OP MATERIAL L a •K i+ ,�, •o ' z 3 K J u •^ — — ow) . ;� SS — — -- 16 — 17 — 18 19 .Lj,.\Y�� — — — 0 0 0 ,_50/5' ±- , �12'189.5'-21.0') Completely leathered. extremely weak, lJ medium brow% (10YR 5/6), silty F. Ss — — 20 _- 21 - 22 - 23 24 aWO yellowish SANDSTONE moncalcareous, gypsum.dry, WEATHERE➢ BEDROCK _ _ - 0 0 0 _ ^ 25 44 S0/4,SANDSTONE. ,� `�/�1IU /�� "'JJJ... (24.5'-26.0') Completely eeOthere(A extremeiy weak, nedwh yellowish brawn. (IOYR 5/6), Any P. nonGslCareous, QyPsun. wet. WEATHERED BEDROCK SS ---• — — --- 26 ^- 27 28 — '^ 29 LW aow� <29.5'-31.0') Completely weathered nxtremety weak, medium yellowish brown. (10YR 5/6), rally F. SANDSTONE nancalGoreOus, QyQsu% wet, WEATHERED BEDROCK J — — — 0 0 0 z 0 U C5 J J CC 2 I 1 CO C 8 CHK'D SY _v.'casT eh to • 61 IAA 1 I.i SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE NAME ANO LOCATION WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION CENTRAL VELD SANITARY LANDFILL GREELEY, COLORADO Nprthko 37048946 CostInt 2.193.901.46 DATUM NOV❑ ELEVATION 475940 DRWNC METHOD. 325' ID. 7.25' OD BORING NO. HOLLOW STEM AUGER GVMV-IQ SHEET SAMPUNG METHOD' spit spoon (SS) 3 0< 3 °Rubs: TART - Mask WARP LEYt1 214' ! TWE TINE TINE 1600 1=1 1843 DATE 3/11/92 OATS °ATE CASING ()GPM 2/27/92 3/2/92 GRILL RIG CME-53 SURFACE CO+OITIONS YerY n Y ANGLE 90 BEARING NA SAMPLE HAMMER 140tb/30' ici !EST wESULTS WW jl ,0e N SAMPLE NUMBER DESCRIPTION Of MATERIAL ix ix C '4 g pU .— 55 K W.. K o J N 7. - 31 — 32 — 33 — 34 -- — _ — 35 ,1 SO/3 .. yI� X (34,3'-36.0') Completely weothertd, extremely weak. •-' a 0 0 - - — 36 —37 — 38 -- 39 '9r moo medium yellowish brown. (10YR 5/6), silty F. SANDSTONE, noncalcarecus. gypsum, wet, WEATHERED BEDROCK a - =_ 4p 70 50/2, �:� - r,( (39.5'-4(47 Completely weatnerec0 extremely mew'. \:J neps., yellowish brown. (1OYR 5/6), stty f. SANDSTONE, noncalCareous. gypsum, wet. WEATHERED 0 0 0 _ — 41 - Az 43 ` 44 tr 'V now BEDROCK TOTAL DEPTH w 45.0' SEE ROCK CORE LOG 45-0'-69.0' - 4 i I ±1 m C Fit (NAME : __GJNV-I2 _ 931061 RECORD OF DRIUNOI.E GWMW-12 9•e 1 et 2 PROJECT. m4TRALYED !AIMS NORCO: AP NOOaTCOM NYR16CO1E anal. rat OCOM par. 470.40 PROJECT PO Y'i2403 OPIUM 276 212►02 ODO'OYYfl re3106S066 62.7230:546 WCARON: 016W. CO Call RD: comas A2MtAN; Nation * a 1 A6CK YRf MAW Pals Neil uanr W4aw.re Mr 042tareV ssame, Raa.see`'see iaa ar 4. nmY. },{ - III W M R4 9TRENGTM RS WD4 D J $ 4 22.127 S i NOTES ATERLAIC Wa4eTtarOf1AT10'1 DFwM11pN 'a^ O44Nnh471TY O1TA OrOr g 1100 MR~. I. k ' S s ` °�2'^10N a - 47 n 51 - , x - 57 • e1Mr el I . ,l • t•45 • 1 • Sapp %OWyDen aW.0.h 110 DIFYF7.- 304.0.N 30J.0.KN 70J.R10.K 14 *RFT.• 11 0IF/FT,• L p ya f 4. . d ° :: £ 1 _ ' Sampler 51.7321' - spy 02 54.1-54.6' in 55. rods060•09a- * 16.7 , Sampls s3 57.057.6' - cow* o0dng at 61.6' These m 69.0' Dotal lopth ' S. midland. way waic dark ya6dwl'r1 brown ODYR 4170. silty Ike SANDSTONE nonadeawaa war, ken Oldd• mining 465-46.7' and 47.4.47.5- Oark gray. (N3), CLAYSTONE Intone* 40.930.2' Ctayetane (529.36.1) Slightly vwadtered. very weak medium dark gray, (N4), may 6M SANDSTONE. with ImnOeded, d hello R,on YSTONE 54.3.5&6' Claywoara 55.0365' Samesighok:anima •Dee•. tly 50.236.4' Cann* Slightly wealqwarraeayyd.'nry tweak mediumdark , mity Snit EwM Ingertudded. SANOSTON) *etc gray. (N3). CI.AYSTONE, acntakanOrla, wet 56635.7• Clryet6ne (61.5419.0) No reoowey 4710 Op ' r 40.40 4708 00 2 e 5200 3 ill x10 4 OW.% TV 76.0 4701.30(56141.1 a IN I Sa lO OQ. 7 w also DEPTH SCAM r.2S I CO0E0' J. CRDEQA DROWNS CONTRACTOR: OPIUM ENOIN OIEGWU W. HO6r Golder Associates ORDER ROC NOGGIN 0476 RECORD OF DRILLHOLE GWMW-12 ss 2 of 2 PROJECT. CENTRAL M D PORNO CC* AM iO ARY CORI kY/TTOCONE OATUFL a L Mare erxq PREUEOT NCR waZ100 Oet12W OATS 2/2ERE COO INAT9 ft 3744EEEE C.ZIaOOIM WCATOAK OREILEY, CO CARL It C11E0s ant MC.kMTOet 410 I ROC ( rveE !Leer Ne ne CeOeee KAeint .Tal'...e R«.�1 •••••• NW roe I aV 8 81 2 OOp w 3 F a;22 t3 1a V[S 3 22133 to agar NOTES gw WATER LEVELS O OBrRIRAFTIfATCN r OtSCJlrflpN 3 -' ...en NM SCRs r -1,A MAV taartk AOD SSS.-. `Q gY i! nw�rtv pArA a .? .i E 2 Y Menlo twice \ °wars° yip 3;t. a ` Zit, e se ..m 71 e n - » en -» in I se 4800.4C • - - e TOTAL DEPTH a MO FL eila3 -DIFin. - eppr dmete number 04 ORI W NO INDUCED FRACTURES per toot Oa11411 ALE: Pear U EEXO: 1 00.103,41 � rJ CRIUJAg CCNMACIOR: CeEUJNO 040011otro�: M. N&TBT . It Golder Associates 931061 aRISEx RICK RDOEPa WTE SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE NAME MO LOUnON WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL GREELEY, COLORADO Northing, 371,668.95 tastily, 2191,477.46 DATUM NGVp ELEVATION 4769.99 DRILLING ME11OD: 3.2S' IA 7.23' CD BORING N0. HOLLOW STEM AUGER GVHW-I2 SMELT SAMPLING WTCD: soot sonar, <SS) 1 or 1 OeLUNG START Noss WATER LEA% :ILO' I TIME t4E 1144 1600 I 1300 ISIS DATE 3/11/921 DATE DATE CASING DC'TH ; 2/18/92 2/21/92 DRILL RIG LIME -SS SURFACE CONDITIONS very ruddy ANGLE 90 BEARING NA SAMPLE HAMMER 140 b/30' TEST RESULTS n,.., ZS �y e, a, G �+ 5S5- SAMPLE NDVMBER DESCRIPnONANOT INTERNE u �p+ G ca p 8y V i H r N 5 J �^ ru 31 — 32 '--- 33 - 34 (0.0'-35.0') SEE SOIL BERING FOR GWNW-6 i,tluiiIii iii iiuiiii Iitult111111iii uiluiii iuiIii uliuiluiil1iu _'— 35 30/6':• VIOi CII (37-45-07 HIOMy weathered. extrenely week. SS a o 0 — 36 — 37 - 38 = 39 — 40 •— 41 - 42 — 43 X44 — a°°°' moderately brownish yellow. (10YR 5/4). silty f. SANDSTONE Poorly ,nduretea, WEATHERED BEDROCK TCTA1, DEPTH • 43.0' o a o S IT - CO 0 8 • 8 V a' -C O RECORD mar artern Lw4D sown e tsiCT,0 01344C0 aura LOCATION: O gott&Y. CO CILLl At leLTICO: OF DRILUHOLE GWMW13 Ow 1 a 1 Mn110TNMCOR pa/TACO,! OATUat a Cala Ma: Ness 7/21AM COC1✓beaT0 Pk RI S% Ct$MTAI ante e•G,M71Mt e OMt: CMim Icy^ ti 0CC0 TIT Along Ram Passim. • - 00• ••• KIYrmem, se—✓ sUMA•U41•••••••O�.w ••• •n -e.aaw mayor m.a' rice• mown.'mown.'vav, resat L S 'ISi L 25 ¢¢ 3 m Ga 2122 I 9 p r5 X g 3 i RSI$i .22;12✓ NOTES WATF11UtiFL' a a147RYCITATO4 E' OQBUa r 4 8 `a§ O >• SUE m 3 `S 'y19CGNT1. Y OATH 1 •O • 3 2 3 3rM30 1 ' SWAGS 0000.10•00 yip 32 OWN o - A.7 71 yT se 50 01 al 00 a 0 1154.R8 1•s aF/FT.• S >10 OIFFT.• >1001F/Fr.• . ,. 514 41 $ Ig 3 +,f q#r 4 33t 4n • {e 3 v. 7 • ".>;' ' Samp1 15x2 salsas' — . , T',4 (45.0-45.61 Ur* weatheree, vent welt meanseans brOaR ooh 5/4). rely fine SANDSTONE. Iemhlesee. Iron oxide mined. nonawn.oue (45.1540.11 Frealc veryweek medium NDS grief. thin CLAYSTONE Mal) Weems (.01..051. slightly oskansO a, becoming nonodoenoue with depth (52.4-55.01 11/2030M720 Ot CLAYSTON intarpada increasing and moaner increasing (o.1o.G1 (5155151501 Cloy mole 4709 .50.Co I re ,7191 4714 fa Sew 1320 3 al a 4 r TOTAL DEPTH - e0.7 Ft. °A10 *DIF/FT - approximate number of DARLING INDUCED FRACTURES per foot 00.10 OLTf scns: rex.4 LOOSED J. CREWING DR1Jn0001.fAM4:ID1t 01ewNG ECM olco®: w,.a ..� Golder Associates CRxI.E/1: No( ICGE. DATE RECORD OF DRILLHOLE GWMW-14 sw■ e a e ryI046CT: CV4M*&WSO smear e: •—CeCtYet N%RWCONe OATUtk la C3.LSSS b: et, 24 w10lICT Na OIii4Dd orellse0 OAn: YITWR Cate t Zfl2t6>A2 =Ana: Malt. CO MU. MP a*ae AbWR. OGldTllt 41 p4CKhIa aent n.-- San RI.. Can.. aaw..Ya awn uL.My.y 41444•1014 1.4444ONar.N s .. ..rr.. 4404 MAC Am. " i L` ₹1:42,1221 F �a5 g '' J`�gF OJ I .Y ` $` E XIII- aaaai, NOM WATER i�VO,a $ ► WAT R tegYr N 8 O�l•ItoN OO O N sev Y NOD flit R i C19CO' NI!Num' all i �1 . S X 4 TrwYn Wee oocwnreoN ₹y2 3Y L osrN _ - ' ' ' . 28 40 AS b Se 4 24 �.A, i • 2c.J,R�� 6OJ.R n.K Y7 DIF(F'T.• 13 D1F/fT.•^SY a .. . .'".. �v a:' :F , s zs .. Dagon Doing at 41.0' Saepl. 07 40.744.4' Sample Pl 40.0+0.1' .. Sanep4.O 11944.4' Ss.OWMW-7 (0.045.0`) ao .e041.01 Nighty veneered. ee..((N weak. Wllabb fine SANMTONE Wy avert nar•1ar.as, at (41,0.44.5) 41.G. G� kteNmodMm weayellowish brawl. (10YR s/4). ally floe SANDSTONE no,aOkU.DIa 4441 co' 471a2a I Y I (44.3.15.01314DOv w.adwr.t very week medium dark corny. (N4T. CLAYSTONE. nono.kn.as, ouy Ins (45.047..1) FICA. Nightly weat[wNd. Very weak medium nor oa DONE b.ddMg 46.$46.5 City Mr, xW 4Mo`t 2 n Moat 4 q04 ' . ',gayety as breads 47.6' day isnot Cram ieree 4Ar Clay ten.., tee(30.344.31 Peroarage of Cwt depth E named4 medium yMy, (. $5), sne SAweek NDY SILTSTONE. with intoned' ot CIAYSTONE O.NIara.% Nightly aYo.Npr CM 'red3p dato IN 261 a142,56 6 n �iOlAl UkPTH . 58.7 FL OaM ro OD •OIF/FT • .ppro.ine number tl ORIWNO MOWED FRACTURES pee toot .3 54.70 e►7D 1oem BdCO• 11.e'ant WILINGoomut tae OPIUM eH6n7 DATE a: J.ef4 Golder Associates DRUMOCK MGMCAT LANDFILL SOIL GAS PROBE LOGS .;,. •t -)V.I. 1w•• „r, ew ^ `i`jC�f ."Ppt.'t ,'a.'.,� ptn '+' :C \ v..• ' k t y..A.+z r i nµ •.yam. rt v] .b y -Y n. .a hM3 :iM .. .+;k t r f,... • r 1f r.":.. "r ` 4,{ ":r•i'aYk tj 1--4 4.c X �t.riX`'A!t�it�+ l''' .'"+� iyiv tte";w? /yL w4-rr .t� t. -:«y '�� ,.'�'„�,yy..v. .. > '• • t -r r 'r'�-� l Y i�T' M1 'f 'n "�.-O i. ...n n: x.1r;.. + .; ±f,,•.' �l• TX"'!M'IB�i�^f{.re,-p[tC-.-: 1 ;�.y / 'Yw�.w ^"b"' +t.r".«r`Pro v i•-'i1M�. r r. ♦ ) I� r. • Mai' ,.•:4�n ur....r.a:r ..yowwn..xtr�W'.. ,..+.r...{_+.,, .. —.r• ...Vi..r.>,:...MZ. APPENDIX C MAJOR DIVISIONS GRAPHIC S MBOL GROUP SYMBOL TYPICAL DESCRIPTIONS COARSE GAINED Sr SOtls Rua SO% OOf NATLRIIIL IS NO. ZOO SI VE SRC CRAVE!. AND GRAVELLY SOILS NOR[ TRAM !DTI OL C INACTION insam NO. ASILK CLAYS C4Y[LTG ....,...•,...........:,R �;'ti �-- W tuRCL uT wens. ONG NLL}IRILZ urflL a No rNlsx (lam ION >x ^'a) - • • - - G P WYO.- fusel wits nXES J , S ). . i �i-. . �' . I .i.i . G ► / 7Y1 mown S. wV[t-LwD-SILL tufty ) \.: • G C W . wva-SAnO-Mr w SAND AND SANDY SOILS .CSS tNAN SOY. OF Walt SUMP OI so. ♦ WV( CLEAN SANG : '.•.•: •. SW .7 YY -camotG ywbS, Gamma wan. 0711 oll NO ma /Ws) . s s O LOOnT-G1AocO SANDS. wvnlY Win LBTLL OR sO GAO SANDS WIiN nNCS •{jlij:i: I 77]j • :. `.I S M SILTY Subs. Su.o-SILT XMVRCS fN0!l MAN IZS ins) t ''S. \, \'•.� S C cum SANDS. SANG-cuT NILTURCS FINC GRAINED sons MORE NMS 501 a MAMMAL IS �i THAN NO. 20o tax SILTS 1 ,i» i' � l f) I }\ M Ise l.. MO Hirt tv wws• .04 Moo. s. DOT MNo R0.'X OR C. CURT A TI OR C{.tT SR15 WTI SYG+A it R WTI Sit MASTIC,. LMIwO we AND yr•I;i ism S0% CLAYS \`\\\,\" \\'\ N\ \� CL INOMJMC Cun Or LOW TO SOWN rusnC°TY. wntY MAYS, SANDY CLAYS. SRTT GLIM LOAN Gan ,5. '%:�++'ff•••:' J'.. . :,+f'+� j O L w oece StT'S A O orcawc gar CLAYS Of LON naanGTY SILTS II 1I 1 '; ' I M H flC'aC RATS. NIGCCOMS a OIAT«NLLWS m( SAND ON lam, SOAS LS T R S AND iii TSAR S� CLAYS / / C H ffl Cur Curt OR NNRI nASIpTY. hi Curl H OH ONCNAC CLAYS Or MW TD IRON h.4.4oc TY. omosasC w's O T I I PST. Haut woe SOR_S NOX ICON ORKAwc CONtENTS NIGILY ORGANIC SOILS ^'^"'=^' FE^= sum OIUL 1TNRws AA( VSLO TD mart icctws.C tot Qks aTNNL ROC% rfrLS CALCNCYC SOIL AND ROCK CLASSIFICATION CHART Denver, Colorado CUSM/PROMECY WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL DRAWN ZROZED _ OPH OA JAC sc."NOT TO "SCALE I 'NC 4647'C4' NO, 2AOSCUS.OYN7 JUNE 1992 I's NO. 923-2403 REVIEWED PILE NO. 'Mulct 0 U1/451061 SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE NAME AN0 LOCATION ORIWNC METNOO: 325' ID. 725' OD !. BORMC NO. NQLLf1V STEM ADDER I SG -t. I SHEEP WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION sAwFUNC lA n100: CONTtNIIDUS Salmi BARREL I 1 of 2 CENTRAL VELD SANITARY LANDFILL GREELEY, COLORADOvial I yhWNA I nresN Northing, 372.744,47 Eastingi 2,191,475.35 HATER LOC 21.0' �I `IAE nwE IVA 1600 I I 1530 1630 OATE 3/11/92 WYE DATE DATUM NGVD ELEVATION 4815.40 CAS►NC DEPTH 13/11/92 3/11/92 DRILL RIG CNE'S7 i SURFACE CONDfONS very nyddy ANC_E 90 SEARING NA I SAMPLE HAMMER NA /5TEST REsui.TS '1 < ti ; �� .4. .36 u x SAMPLE NUMBER AND DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL nn or A.A. K 8 t �7 _ M z sl, i f. u in T - 1 3 \ (0.0'-3.0') Stiff, yellowish bran, (IOYP 5/8). unstratiFied SILTY CLAY and F. SAND. Strongly \Calcareous, gypsum, damp. (CL) \ O CS 0 0 0 — —s 6 i— — 8 \ (20'-8.0' Stiff, yellowish brown. (10YR 5/8). unstratlfled SILTY CLAY and F. SAND, strongly calcareous, gypsum, damp, (CL) ® r 0 0 0 — — 9 (8.0'-9,00 HioNy weathered, ewtrenely weak, dark yellowish orange. CLOYR 6/6), saw F. SANDSTONE and interbedded CLAYSTONE. n0nCalcareous, 0 0 0 — — 10 - — 11 - t2 13 stratified. gypsum. damp. WEATHERED BEDROCK (9,0'-9.8') Highly weetnered, ewtrelnely weak, dark yellowish orange. (10YR 6/6). silty t. SANDSTONE. nOncalCareous. d0n0. WEATHERED BEDROCK — <9,8'-13.00 Highly weather -ell extremely weak, dock yellowish orange. (1OYR 6/6), silty F. SANDSTONE — and interbedded CLAYSTDNE, noncolcoreous, stratified. gypsum damp, WEATHERED BEDROCK O CS — ' , — — — _ — — 14 (13.0''18.0') Highly weathered, ewtrenely week„Dark yellowish orange, (1OYR 6/6). saty F. SANDSTONEand interbedded CLAYSTONE. nonCalCareOUS. stratified, gypsum. damp WEATHERED DEDRCCK - --' CS i _ ""( 0 0 0 C C CO C 931061 SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE NAME AND LOCATION DRILLING METHOD: 3.25' 1D, 7.25' CD j DOPING NO, HOLLOW STEM AUGER SG-i. SHEET WASTE SERVICES CCRPCRATICN vatic AET*00, CCNTINuOuS SAMPLE BARREL 2 or 2 CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL GREELEY, COLORADO 0RLLHC Northing, 372,744.47 START AMSH Casting. 2.191.475.33 matt LEVEL 21.0' / TIC nAE TAE 1600 I 1530 1630 DATE 3/11/921 DAtE DArt DATUM NCVD ELEVATION 4913,40 USING DEPTH 1 3/11/9e 3/11/92 DRILL RIG CME-55 SURFACE CONDITIONS very muddy ANCLE 90 atomic NA SAMPLE HAMMER NA l— �^ 2 TEST QESULts W'— ' > - - co.. 4W f 'ds. �3 ,o 8 (id SAMPLE NUMBER AND DCSCRIPTION or AATER!AL t g11�� \( � � °` a W du K Q . 16 —.G — — - 1a 17V-17.5' Gypsum 17.5'-19+0' CLAYSTCNE _, - - -• — ,— 19 — 2D _.<20.5'-21.7') — 21 — —' - 22 — ^2S i — (1B.0'-20.57 Highly weathered, very weak. Ugh,: olive gray, <5Y 5/2), CLAYSTCNE, and interbedded _ silty F, SANDSTONE, noncalcaredus, gyps*"demm, WEATHERED BEDROCK Highly weathered. very weak, Ilght - Olive gray. (5Y 5/2). CLAYSTCNE. and nterbedded Silty F. SANDSTONE nOnCOlCOreOut. gyOstah. deep. WEATHERED BEDROCK (21.7'-23.0') Highly weathered, very weak, dark yellowith grange. (IOYR 6/6). silty F. SANDSTONE. noncalcareovi, strstiFied Odra WEATHERED BEDROCK �Si S — — -- - _ — - - 0 0 0 - — _25 — — — 26 — - 27 — 2a <23,0'-25.3') highly weathered very wile*, dark yellOwiSh Orange, (MR 6/6). silty C. SANDSTONE, noncdlCareous, Strat;Fled Mang. WEATHERED BEDROCK - <25.3'-20A'> Wgmly weathered. very weak, dark yellowish orange. <10YR 6/6) to light Olive gray, _ (3y 5/V. silty F. SANDSTONE and interbedded ELAYSTONE, noncalCareoul. gypsum, danO. WEATHERED BEDROCK = (28.0'-220') Nighty 6a CS - - — — Z — — _— 0 0 0 C — — _ -29 - 29 - weathered, very weak, dark '7T- yellowish orange, <IDYR 6/6) to Het., olive gray, (5Y 5/2), silty F. SANDSTONE no nterbedded CLAYSTCNE, nOnc4LCareous, gypsu.A da.ns, WEATHERED CV' a — - — - BEDROCK TOTAL DEPTH • 29.0 rt. - 5. c 931061 SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE NAME AND LOCATION WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL GREELEY, COLORADO Northing, 372,240.29 Eastsg, 2,191,476.41 DATUM NOVD ELEVATION 4793.87 ORIWNC MET1100: 3.25' ID, 7.25' OD OORING NO, SG -2 HOLLCV STEn AUGER MEET 1 OF 2 SVIPUNC MEIN0D: CONTINUOUS SAMPLE BARREL O ILIN° STMT FINISH wATER LetEL 22.0' T1ME 0913 TIME 1030 TIME 1330 DATE 3/12/92 DATE 3/I2/92 DATE 3/12/92 CASING DEPTH DRILL RIG CNE-53 SURFACE CONDITIONS very muddy ANGLE 90 REARING NA SAMPLE MANNER NA O,.., t5 TEST RESULTS it Z2.' L" l3e¢ ;O `-' ffi6'� 1X SAMPLE NUMBER AND DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL W 33 7 L X 3u '7 "c" se ¢ W a su M 2 c -J N P — - 1 (OC'-1::) Stiff, yellowish brown, (101R 5/8), 'nstratif,ed. CLAYEY SILT. Whir F. Sand, strongly Ca(Careous. damp, ex.) -. — — — - — 2 - U.1'-2.6') Loose, yellowish brown, <10YR 5/6). 'Aster...Pied. F. SAND, sone Silt trace Clay. strongly calcareous. damp to dry, <CM) (2.6'-3.0') Stiff, yellowish brown now? 5/6), interbedded CLAYEY SILT and F. SAND, trace Cloy, 1 7 CS — - - 4 - 5 -dry. — — 6 _ - _ 7 8 calcareous, damp, (ML-SM) (3.0'-3.3') Stift, yellowsh brown, (l0YR 5/6), Interbedded CLAYEY SILT and F. SAND, trace Clay, calcareous, damp, (It-SM) (3.3'-4.9') Loose, yellowish brown. (10YR 5/6). unstrrt eied. F. SAND. some SAt. trace Cloy, <S non[alcareous, damp to P) — (4.9'-8.0') Highly weathered, extremely weak, dark _- yellowish Orange. (IOYR 6/6). Silty F. SANDSTCNC and mterbeddel CLAYSTONE, noncalcareovs, gypsy". Btrat:fled, dry to damp. VEATHERED BEDROCK 2 O cs - - - — - -- — — 0 0 0 -- - - - 9 _ 10 - — it 12 — 1 S (tO'-..3.09 n Ighly weathered, extremely weak, dark - yellowish orange, <1OYR 6/6> to light oUve gray, 7 (St 5/2), silty F. SANDSTONE and CLAYSTONE, - strat:Fvd, noncalcoreous, gypsum, deny, VEATHEREDD BEDROCK <-1.1 ratio Claystone to Sandstone) - - O CS �- - - - = - - 0 0 0 _ 14 - - (13.0'-16.0') Highly weathered. extremely weak; dark yrllowsh orange. (1OYR 6/6> to Ipht oUve gray, (SY 5/2>, saty 6. SANDSTONE and CLAYSTONE. - stratified, noncalcareous, gypsum, damp WEATHERED _ BEDROCK - O CS - — — - J a 0 U —J J O )- 8 m m O ni Z. I :I w C4 fitENAME: _sue z 931061 SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE NAME AND LOCATION I DRILMNC METHOD: 325' ID. 7.23• CD Sonde MO. HOLLOW STEM AUGER 'G-2 I SHEET WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION SANPLJNG METHOD CtNTtMUOUS SAMPLE BARREL 1 2 OF a CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL GREELEY, COLORADO DRILLING START ' eeSH N0Y thwig, 372,240.29 Casting, 2191,476.41 watt t,LVE1, 2Z0' nu[ Ti TIME m( TIME 1330 0913 1030 DATE 13/12/92 DATE DATE DATUM NGVD ELEVATION 4793.87 CASINO DEPTN 1 i 3/12/92 3/12/92 GRILL RIO CME-55 I SURFACE CONDITIONS very nuody ANCLE 90 DEARING NA SAMPLE HAMMER NA g TEST RESULTS W,.. ` �� 0.� V C- Wh a J Y NYN SAMPLE NVMDER AND 7E5CRIPiION or MATERML OZ < a T. C gg \� 0" O� M W W 3V M _ 2 n W N 16 - — 17- 18 .., �1_ LLCL (16.0'-19.3') Sane as above e•Cep< bedding Wore IF- prominent.Claystone less weathered and none Fissae • CS �• —19 - _ — 20 .... 21 — 22 — 23 = _ (19.3'-23.0') Highly weathered, extremely weak, dark yellowish orange, (101R 6/6) to light olive gray (3Y 5/2). 'nterbedded silty P. SANDSTONE and FlsSiie _— CLAYSTONE. nOnCalCareO4AS, Qyosta% damp. WEATHERED BEDROCK O OS Wr - - — - 0 0 0 _ — 24 - — 25 — 26 - _ - 27 <23.O'-2S.R') Highly weathered. extremely weak. dark yellowish orange. (10YR 6/6) TO tight ativp gray (51 3/2), interbedded silty P. SANDSTONE and ',me__ CLAYSTCNC. nontalcareous, gypsum. damp, WEATHERED BEDROCK (25,9'-27.x) Highly weathered. extremely weak. moderate yellowish brown. (l01R 3/4), silty F. SANDSTONE noncolcareaus. aanp. WEATHERED BEDROCK © ES — - — -. - — 0 0 0 - 28 — 29 TOTAL DEPTH - 27.5 rt. — - 0 ' C] '-' z 931061 SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE NAME AND LOCATION WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDGILL GREELEY. COLORADO Northing, 371,730.47 Caning. 2,191.471.BD DATUM MGVO ELEVATION 4770.27 DRILL RIO CME-33 ANGLE 90 DRILLING M3fOD: 3.23' ID, 7.23. OD MCLLOW STEM AUGER wows No. SG -3 I SHEET SAMPLING METHOD: CONTINUOUS SAMPLE BARREL I OF 2 CONLuNC START nut 1400 EINISH TIME WATER LEVD. 9.0' 11AK DATE 13/12/92 1500 1330 CASING OE'PTM DATE 3/12/92 DATE 2/12/92 SURFACE CONOmONs very nudely 2EARING NA SAMPLE KAMMER NA W.-. "St yZ� OW AEr N SAMPLE NUMBER AND DESCRIPTION OF M4TERML S JuPt(R AND Blf G 732 N ZZ< 1 — 2 ' - 3 - 4 — 5 — - 5 - 8 - 9 - 10 13 — 14 (0.0'-2.3') Stiff, dark yellowish brown <lOYP 4/4), unstratif,ed, SILTY CLAY. sane f.- red. Sana sllgntly caccareous. dan0, CCU (2.3'-2.0') H:ghly wPainered, extremely wak, Ught olive gray. (3Y 3/2), CLAYSTCNE, and N)terbeaoed dark yellowish orange, (1OYR 6/6), silty f. SANDSTONE. nOnCalcareous, gypsum, tiara, WEATHERED BEDROCK C8.0'-'11,2' Highly weathered, extremely flak. U3ht olive gray, (51 3/2). CLAYSTONE, and interbedded dark yellowish orange. (1OYR 6/6), silty r. SANDSTONE, noncatctreous, gypsum, wet. WEATHERED BEDROCK (IL2'-16.0') Sane OS above, except more COnOetent, slightly !ess weathered, bedding more prominent O CS CS CS CS ✓ V ✓ V ✓ V ✓ V ✓ V Vmd ✓ V ✓ V ✓ V ✓ V TE`T RESULTS M Z E� S,s V 0 Al 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 01 NIM PI CIIK'0 8Y v. HERS! N ul NI 931061 SOIL BOREHOLE LOG Sat NAME AND LOCATION WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL GREELEY, COLORADO Northing, 371.730.67 Castugl 2.19LA71.80 DATUM ',CVO ELEVAOON 4770.87 ORILLINO MIT/00: 3.2t ID. 7.2.31 CD I BOPwC No. I4CLLOV STEM AUGER SG -3 91EET SM4PUNG ML7M00: CCNT1NUCus SAMPLE BARREL 2 or 2 militia START FINISH PATEN LEVLT- 9.0' TWE nue euE 1500 1400 1330 GTE 2/12/92 1 DATE OAtC CASING DEPTH 3/12/92 3/12/92 GRILL RIC CME-SS I SURFACE CON0a1oNS very hWilY ANGLE 90 wCCAPINC NA SAMPLE HAMMER NA DEPTK IN FEET (ElEYRION) TEST RESULTS gW4 ,qw 3 u 3i �`�" y.MPLE NUMBER DESCRIPTION OF MATERPL ₹ I a a �= V ,.., OS i w.t <b au K 9_ t .^ N 6 1 B .'. '_ _ -17 - 18 - 19 —20 — 21 —22 = 23 —2a — 2S —26 — 27 - 28 -29 TOTAL DEPTH • 16.0 Ft. - — — — z I N 0 Iw1 al Nj MI P! hi C' 2 m 921(161 • SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE NAME AND LOCATION I DRILLING METMOo: 325' ID. 7.25. 0D ODRP C N0. HOLLOW STEM AUGER SG -4 SHEET WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION SAMPLING MEINOD' CONTINUOUS SAMPLE BARREL I or I CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL GREELEY, COLORADO °RLLM° START FMCSNorthing' ]71,391.33 Easrnq, 2.19I.793.56WA7E9 Ii4TI, 7.0' 1 Ts1E GM( TIME 0900 °913 0900 DATE 3/13/92 DATE DATE DATUM NOVI) ELEVATION •763.15 CASING DONN I 3/13/921 ]/13/92 DRILL RIG CME-33 I SURFACE CONOmONS very nudely ANGLE 90 REFIRING NA SAMPLE HAMMER NA I -CI -a 'CST RESULTS Lilt 9 <-.0 La. w V e s \0l P4-4 Idov SAMPLE NUMBER AND DESCRIPTION OF mATERM:', o � rc i ,= V b Z \< ''' ffi M z uW <zz 3y M I. O_ In :C _ — I 2 - 3 \ <0.0'-3.O') :tie F,, dprk yellowish brown. (IOYR 4/6), uns crat:Fad, S,LTY CLAY, spry F , Sand. strongly Calcareous, gypsum, moist. (CO _ ,_4 — 5 `•-' 6 _ 7 .-" 8 1 <3.0'-5.1') StIFF. dark yellowish rawn (IOYR 4/6). b unstratlfled, CLAYEY...T, trace F. Sand, strongly CalCareOus, gypsum, moist, (MU (5.1'-9.0') Mighty weathered, extremely weak, dark yellowish orange. C10YR 6/6), silty f. SANDSTONE and interlarinated CLAYSTONE, nO,CalCOreaus, gypsun, — wet, WEATHERED BEDROCK — O CS — =, _. _ 0 0 — 9 _-1C — 1 1 _ 12 13 <9-0'-13.0') Mighty weathered, it weak, dark yellowish orange. (10YR 6/6), s4ty 9. SANDSTONE. noncalcareous. gypsum, wet WEATHERED BEDROCK _ O GS — — r 0 0 • 0 ` _ t4 — (13.0'-14.0') No recovery . ,�_ TOTAL DEPTH w 14.0 Ft. — — a c INS CC 0 V 0 J J 2 '4 • - Oi 931061 SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE 'JANE AN0 LOCATION ORIWNC NETH00: 3.25' ID, 7.23' OD I BORING No. HOLLOW STEM AUCZR SG -5 I soar WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION SAMPUNG METN00: cDNTCNupus SAMPLE BARREL: 1 of 1 CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL GREELEY, COLORADO I� NOrthing 371,013.36 I STMT FRSSM Ccstn ' L392.128.03 WATER LEVEL 3.0' I HNC The TIME lass ( 1230 1300 WC 3/13/92] I I DATE DATE DATUM NGVD ELEVATION •739.73 CASING DEPTH 3/{3/92 3/13/92 DRILL RID CME-53 j SURFACE CDNDMONS very muddy. Standing/runn,ng water ANGLE 90 BEARING NA SAMPLE HAMNER NAI El 9'�c 7C Li a:— war �3. ‘)DESCRIPTION SANPLE NUMBER AND Of NATER:AL :8 ₹ ,« „ C Y i-0 \< i" TEST RESULTS M `I 3V M a - ,r _ — — 1 — — — 2 — 3 1 <0.0'-3.0') Stiff, yellowish brown. (10'02 5/6), tratifled. 'CLAYEYT with laminae of tiny 9. Sand. strongty calcareous 0,0 -1.8', ncnaalcoreous 1.8'-3.0', roots, nowt. (ML) 0 CS — — — -a — 0 0 0 0 ( - ( ( 0 ( _ — -' 4 _ — 5 — — a - .-- — 9 _ <3.0'-8.C') StiFf, (eltowlsh brown. QM 5/6), Stratified. CLAYEY SILT. with laminae of silty f.— s Sand, noncalcarearoots, moist. (ML) (8.0'-10.0') Highly weathered, extremely weak, d'art. - gray, (N3). CLAYSTCNE and siw F. SANDSTONE laminae, nOncalcareQNs, wet. WEATHERED BEDROCK — 8D Clay - 20Y. sand ,-_-_ 2 O Cs O cs '— — -' - -!0 _ - — - —— — — - 10 — -- 1 1 1 = — 1s 14 — TOTAL DEPTH w 10.0 rt. - — = — a — —,c N I 0' 931061 SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE NAME ANO LOCATION DRILLING hIEM00: 3.27' IA 723• 00 GORING NO. MOLLOV STEM AUCER SC -6 SHEET WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION SAMPUNO METWO' Cp1T[N000S sAMRLE BARREL or 2 CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL GREELEY, COLORADO oRtwNG 11� START MESH Northing, 370,65326 Casting, 2,192423.07 WATER 12 ,�,� p• , nME TIME flue 1445 1400 2543 DATE 3/13/92 GATE CATE OATIJM NUVB ELEVATION 4770.09 CASING OEM I 3/13/92 3/13/92 DRILL RIG CPC -53 SURFACE CONOnoNs ANGLE 90 BEARING NA SAMPLE HAMMER NA M,_,. TES RESULTS _ in, aW �vo— (5 , lW_ --.4:13 u�JJ11666fi666 o -Iv ail— N SAMPLE NUMBER AND OESCRIviION CF MATERuI u 3 0 ! o� 8- \'2 VW ?6 M a_W <b 3u K - . -, ^+ - - — 1 - - - 2 3 I I (0.0'-3.0') Stiff, dark ryellowish brown. (1OYR 4/6), unstratlf ed. CLAYEY T, trace f, ;.ono, strongly calcareous. damp, <ML) CI CS - - - - - - s =6 - 7 8 (3.0'0.07 Stiff, tlark yellowish brown. (IOYR 4/6), unstrat;Pled, SILTY CLAY, Bone E. Sand. SVpngly Calcareous, danO. (CO .e< 7.0 '-9.0' 0 CS - — — — . - - - g ,D - - 11 =iz - 13 J (8.0'-13,07 Stiff. dark yellowish brown, (10TR 4/6), Lineirstifle% CLAYEY MT, trace f, Sand, Strongly Calcareous, damp, (ML) O cs - — - — — - - 0 0 0 — — — _ 14 — — (13.0'-18.0') Stiff. dark brown, (10YR 4/6). unstratlfietl, CLAYEY SILT. trace 9. Sand, CLAYEY SILT strongly Calcareous. dano. (ML) O CS - — — 931061 SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE NAME AN0 LOCATION DRILLING MCfk00: 325' ID, 7.23' on BORING NO. HOLLOW STEM AUGER SG -6 SMEc, WASTE SERVICES'. CORPORATION 54MPLINO METN00' CONTINUOUS SMIPLE HARREL I 2 OF 2 CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL conuNG ., GREELEY, COLCRA00 START rIwsM NorthIng 370,63326 Casting. 2,19242307 WATER LEVEL 2.0' I If TIME TIME THE 1443 I 1400 1343 DATE 3/13/92 jI j DATE OATS DATUM NGVO CLE ATOM 4753.09 CASING DEPTH I I 1 13/13/92 343/92 ORILL RIC CME^53 j SURFACE CONOITIONS ANGLE 90 9FARING NA SAMPLE MANNER NA DEPTH II FM (EEFVA➢0II) - ROWS/FOOT ON OASirC TEST RESULTS wiKF 6't s 6y u �{ N SAMPLE NUMBER AND DESCRIPTION OF WTEPIAL pi < v '- K rcfr N R o ti 6 — 16 -- 1 7 Cr. _ - 1$ — — 19 — 20 21 = 22 — 23 — 24 — 25 — 26 _— 27 __ — 28 r— 29 (19.0'-19.0') StiFF, dark yellowish brown. (1OYR 4/6). unstratlfle[L CLAYEY SILL trace F, Sand. strongly calcareous, darp, (ML) TOTAL DEPTH • 19.0 %t, O CS _ — — — 2 — — �.I ffl 0 U N1 •.: 221 o, r s. 931061 SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE NAME ANO LOCATION WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL GREELEY, COLORADO Northing. 370.660.4a Easing. 2,192.916,57 DATUM NCVD ELEVATION 478025 GRILLING MCT1400: 325' ID. 7.25' CO BORING NO. HOLLOW STEM 'WEER SG -7 SHEET SAMPUNC MEMO: CONTINUOUS SAMPLE BARREL 1 0V 4 OFOWNO START FINISH WATER LEWD. i 40' I DME TIME PME 1330 ; 1100 1330 DATE 3/16/921 1 GATE I OATS CASINO OEPTH I 3/16/92: 7/16/92 ORILL RIC CME-55 SURFACE CONDITIONS slphtly muddy ANGLE 90 BEARING NA SAMPLE HAMMER NA OEP➢1 N FEET (ELEVAI ION) BLOW may; OR SAMPLER SEGOVIA t) TEST RESULTS SAMPLE NUMBER AND OCSCRIPTION OF MATERNL o u tC A G J 2 ? o'rt.'V I� u 'rt.'Y a `k <V M 2 '^ , b — 1 — - 2 -_ I I .iI (0.0 1. '-3.0') Siff, dark yello..cm brown, (IOYR 4/6). ^ nstratie,ed. CLAYEY 5' 'trace F. Sand. rOngly Calcareous, rOOtS. damp, (ML) I . 1 O CS _ — - - - — 3 _ - 4 - - 5 - - 6 - 7 - I' - (20'-4,5') Loose, brownish yellow. (10YR 6/9), ..nstrat;Fled F. SAND. some Silt, tract Clay. nOnCaLCarvOus, damp, (SM) (4.. 5'-B.0') STIFF, dark yeltow.S" brown, (10YR 4/6), unstratiFied, CLAYEY SILT. tittle F. Sono. Calcareous, O7psun, ran oxide staining, damp. (ML) <8.O'-8,5') Loose, Iranian yellow. (10YP 6/8), 2 CS _ — - - _ - 0 0 0 - 8 9 - — - 10 _ - 11 :.. 12 unstratlFled F. SAND, some Sat. trace Clay, nonCalCareous. damp, (SM) <8.5'-13.O') Highly weathered, extremely weak, dark - yellowish orange, (IOYR 6/6) and brown's" gray, (SYR 4/1), CLAYSTCK, and interlamaMted, yoUOw.sh orange, (IDYR 6/6), sAty F. SANDSTONE, lannoted. noncalcareous, gypsum. dale,. WEATHERED BEDROCK (-i.1 ratio tO Sandstone) — -� O CS C' —' _ - — — — —14 _ — - (I3.0' -IBA') Sane as above except sightly nbre ' competent and lamination better deFmed O CS — — _ - — 0 0 0 NI WI ii WI a� O U C) -I 0 O yVI .1 V )— a I 5 - CO CO C G SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE NAME AND LOCATION DRILLING METHOD: CAD' tD, 727' 021 BORING NO. HL.LCV STEM AUGER $G-7 SHEET WASTE SERVICES CDRPCRATIDN SAMPLING MEnro0: CCNTTNUDUS SAMPLE BARREL 2 OF A CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL DmwNG GREELEY, CCLDRADD START I FINISH Nom Using, 370.660,44 Caicnq, 2.192.916.37 wpm" ave. AO' I j nu( I TIME TIM[ 1330 Iwo 1330 WE 3/t6/92 WC Got clove NGVD ELEVATION 4780.25 CASING DEPM L I 3/l6/9Q J/16/92 ORILL RIG CHE-SS 1 SURFACE CONDITIONS suphtly muddy ANGLE 90 BEARING NA I SAMPLE HAMMER NA r r8 TES RESULTS 'rr'? T Z. Z. T -'• 24uV ,Je. ; O SAMPLE NUMBER AND DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL C , r r Q �y� S O N WW 3u M J 'm g -16 - CS — - — — l e _ 79 W 20 - -- 21 ..- 22 C18.0'-2&0') Some as above except more competent - - - ... O CS — J - - _ 0 o 0 a 0 a - 23 - 24 25 — - 26 _.27 =28 — — - ,L9 .. _ — 290'-33.0') Mighty weathered, extremely weak. Cork yefowlsh orange. (IOYR 6/6), silty F. SANDSTONE. pronouns, Iron oxide staining, damp, VEATICR£D BCDROCK © CS 0 CS = — _ - — - - - _ — - - OC 0 o o 931061 SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE NAME ANO LOCATION WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL GREELEY, COLORADO Northlnqi 370.660.44 EaStng, 2,192,916.57 DATUW NGV3 ELEVATION 478023 ORIL,UNC METHOD: D25' 13. 725' CID BORING NO. HOLLOW STEM AUGER SG -7 SHEET SAMPLING MEMOO: CONTINUOUS SAMPLE BARREL 3 or 4 OR,UJMG STMT I RMSM WATER LEVEL I 40, THE TIME t TIME I 1330 1100 1330 GATE 3/16/92 I DATE OATS CASING DEPTH I 3/16/92 3/16/92 DRILL RIG CME-33 ! SURFACE CONDITIONS slightly muddy ANGLE 90 BEARING NA SAMPLE HUMMER NA TES RESULTS yr. _ xW KJ� R W gg o u ai5 J p j1MRLE NUMBER ANO DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL CO S / as p u OZ \� V1' ,5 M �7 t icy IS M g Q - J '^ T -31 -_ — 32 33 CS - - — - ww — — = 34 - 35 — — - 36 - — - 37 .,— � 38 (33.0'-35.0') Highly weathered. ewtreneiy weak, dark yellowish orange. <10YR 6/6), silty C. SANDSTONE. 'am:noted.:ron oxide staining damp. WEATHERED BEDROCK (33.0'-38.0') Highly weathered, extremely weak, dark _ yellowish orange, <10YR 6/6) and brownish gray, <5YR 4/1), CLAYSTONC, and interlarwnated. veltowish orange. <IDYR 6/6). silty F. SANDSTONE, laminated. — noncaicareous, gypsum, damp, WEATHERED BEDROCK © CS _ — — — - - - - 39 riii — 40 — - 41 - 42 — 43 (38.0'-43.0') Nighty weathered, extremely weak, dark yellow6h orange, C1OYR 6/6), silty F. SANDSTONE. laminated, iron oxide staining, damp. WEATHERED BEDROCK s 0 CS _ — —' ._ — - — _ _- 44 - — (43,0'-48,0') Highly weathered, extremely weak, dark yellOw.Sh Orange, (10YR 6/6), silty F, SANDSTONE. tan.natea. Iron ox4e staining, wet. WEATHERED BEDROCK e CS — _ - — x 5- IAJ C 8 2 m; 0 C O a LJ C0 931061 SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE NAME AND LOCATION WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION CENTRAL VELD SANITARY LANDFILL GGREELEY, COLORADO Northing, 370,660.44 EOstmq. 2.192916.37 DATUM NGVO ELEVA1lON 479025 ORIWNC csoo; 3.23' ID. 725' CD OCRING NO MGLLOW STEM AUGER I SG -J SHEET SAMPLING MO1400: CDNTINUOUS SAMPLE BARREL 4 OF 4 mac START FINISH WATER LEY,2 40' I I TIME TIME TIME 1330 1100 1330 DATE 3/16/92 DATE DATE CASING DEPTH 3/16/92 3/16/92 DRILL RIG CAME -SS SURFACE CONOMONS slightly NMCCy ANGLE 90 BEARING NA SAMPLE MANNER NA stow/ s ON SAAR CR (RE COVERT) TEST RESULTS W"r� �W Z< x ., �i $ SAMPLE NUMBER AND DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL O K< W L p u OZ NV o; N z sW he a o N _^, - 46 - - 47 CS 48 = 49 — 50 51 -- 52 — 53 — 54 — 55 — 56 — 57 _-58 — 59 TOTAL DEPTH • 48.0 ft. - — — _ _ C 0 0 W J nl MI PI 2 a t 931061 SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE NAME AND LOGTON WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL GREELEY, CCLCRADD Northing, 370,672.80 Fasting, 2493,414,15 DATUM NGVD ELEVATION 4791.90 DRIWNC METHOD: A.25' ID. 825' DD I BORING N0, HOLLOW STEM AUGER I SG -9 SMEET SAMPLING Ma 00: CONTINUOUS SAMPLE BARREL 1 OF 3 I ORIWNG I START I FINISH —I •44.17J1 LEVEL 22,73' I THE I TIME TUX1615 I 1000 I 1130 DATE 4/28/92, 1 DATE GATE CASING OEPTM l 3/23/92 3/23/92 DRILL RIC CME-55 CONDITIONS dry, barren SURFACE ANGLE 90 BEARING NA SAMPLE HAMMER NA (RpMVA333) 133) M 141.330 W TES' A'ESULTS 4w7 \ tj G? $AYPL[ NUMBER AND DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL u � Sjj X Q J \ o f K u., aG K 4 J N - - 1 — 2 (0,O' -DO') Strt. brownish yellow. (1OYR 6/6), unstrot.F.ed, CLAYEY SILT, trace F. Sand. strongty calcareous, roots. damp, <ML) O - - -- S - - 4 — 5 - - 6 - 7 - - — (3.0'-5.00 Stiff. brownsh yellow. (10YR 6/6), unstratiFled. CLAYEY SILT, trace f, Sand. strongty CalCoreOus. r0oti. damp. (Ml) (5.0'-8.07 Completely weathered, extremely weak. dark yellowish orange, (IOYR 6/6), silty P. SANDSTONE, and SYxnly interbedded. Completely weathered, extremely weak, grayish Drown, (SYR 3/2). CLAYSTCNE, decreasln.ly calcareous w,th depth. Iron - oxide staining, gypsum. damp. WEATHERED BEDROCK O CS - - — o o a - 8 - — g 10 — -11 - 12 - c8.0'-13.0'> Sane as above, except highly weathered. _ beading mare drama/km!, np,Calcareous — Q cS siii - — -- — _ 13 —14 — (13.0'-18.0') Sane as above, except -657. CLAYSTCNE — O CS = r — e a a CHK'0 BY V. ME RS! 931061 SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE NAME AND LOCATION I DRILLING METh00: '23' ID. 825' OD BARING NO. SG'8 HOLLOW STEM AUGER SHEET 2 or 3 VAST SERVICES CORPORATION SAMPLING METHOD' CONTINUOUS SAMPLE BARREL CENTRAL VELD SANITARY LANDFILL ORgy1HG GREELEY, COLORADO START CPAS) Northing, 370,672.80 Fasting! 2,193,414.13 WATER LEVEL 22.73' I TIME 1000 nrE I 1130 TIME 1613 DATE 4/29/92 I DATE 3/21/92 DATE 3/23/92 DATUM NGVD ELIVAnON 4791.90 c*sc DL'TN DRILL RIG CME-55 I SURFACE CONDITiONS dry, barren ANGLE 90 BEARING NA SAMPLE HAMMER NA TES RESULTS -6 Z w HMS'; ,,c HMS'; g SAMPLE NUMBER{ moD DESCRIPTION OF ANTFAIAL ce ew a ua ' g .g' on u K ca- K ( i .67 _-16 — 17 - — —19 -20 - — 21 — — - 22 - t 'c — (18.0'-21.1') Sone as above — <21.1'-23.0'> Moderately weathered, very weave, dark yellowish orange. QOYR 6/6). stty F. '::ANDSTDNC, nOnCalCareOus. Few Clayctone ,nterbeas <as above). danp. WEATHERED BEDROCK CS ..--,18 O CS _— _ —, — - — — — — — - r — o 0 o o a o - 23 — — — ...w, 24 —25 (23.0'-25.2') Moderately weathered, very amok. dark yellowish orange. CIOYR 6/6>. Silty F. SANDSTONE. noncalcareous, Few Claystone Interbeds COS above), ammo, WEATHERED BEDROCK © — - — - - — '^''• 26 - — _ 27 - <25.2'-28.0') Moderately weathered, very weak, dark yellowish orange. (10YR 6/6). silty F. SANDSTONE.— = :lonely laminated with highly weathered. very week. grayish brown. (SIR 3/2). CLATSTtWC, noncalcareouc. gypsum layers, damp. WEATHERED BEDROCK _ CS - — - — — o o 0 — 28 - — 29 - - _ <as(Y-DJ-O') Moderately weathered. very weak. dark yN(dwifh orange, (IOYR 6/6), silty F. SANDSTONE. Finely laminated with YNghly weathered. very weak. — grayish brown, MR 3/2). CLAYSTDNE. nOncatcare0u . _ gypsum layers, sang, WEATHERED BEDROCK 07 CS - — - - - - S ' S i S r s N. 9431061 SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE NAME AND LOCAnON WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL GREELEY, COLORADO Northing, 370,672.80 Eastmg� 2,197,414.13 OAT" NGVD ELEVAnos 4791.90 DRILLING METN00: 42Y ID. 8.2'3' CD I BORING NO. HOLLOW STEM AUGER SG -8 SHEET SAMPLING METHDO: CONTINUOUS SAMPLE BARREL 3 or 3 ; omwNG START Nei w4117 tD/EL 2273, TGE TIME TINE 1 1615 I WOO 1130 DATE 14/29/92 I I GTE DALE CASING oonm ! 3/23/92 3/23/92 DRILL RIO CME-55 I sunAcc ooNOmoNs dry, barren ANGLE 90 BEARING NA SAMPLE HAMMER NA BLOW/ IFS ON SANPUR (RCCOY(RT) I BLOWS/FOOT Oh CASING TEST RESULTS y :`i �W yy OV g . SAMPLE NUMBER AND DESCRIPTION of INTERNE O k 2 x .- a M ylt„ #V K " 2 o t 2 Z b —31 - r (33.0'-33.2') Moderately weathered. very weal., dorh Cs _ - 33 '— �r�. - - - - — -- yellowish brown. (IOYR 5/4). silty C. SANDSTONC :ron oxide stained, laminated. noncaicareouz damp. WEATHERED BEDROCK CS - _ — -.-34 - -^ 35 - - 36 - 37 — 38 — 39 r 40 —41 42 - - 43 44 (33.2'-34.0') Slightly weathered. very weak, dvsky brown. (SIR 2/2). CLAYSTCNE. naacalcareOMc, fissile. clang WEATHERED BEDROCK TOTAL DEPTH • 34.0' — —. NI Z zl a1 CD CD 0 8 O NI MI a' 2 C O >- C3 C CJ W G 0, JI W tr 931061 SOIL BOREHOLE LOG sat NAME AND LOCATION WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL GREELEY, CDLORADD NOrtMmq, 370,688.01 Eastng, 2,193,887.48 DATUM NGVD ELEVATION 4759.27 ORIWNC MEYM00: 423' ID. 825' OD BORING NO. MOLLOY STEM AUGER SG -9 SHEET SAMPIJNC uCDlOD' CONTINUOUS SAMPLE BARREL 1 or 3 q MC START nNSM wAIE$ LEY'a 22.67 TIME TIME TIME 1625 I 1000 1143 DATE 4/28/92 GATE OATS CASWG 00,114 3/25/92 3/25/92 GRILL RIG CMC-55 1 SURFACE CONDITIONS dry, FAL barren ANGLE 90 GEARING NA SAMPLE HAMMER NA PEST RESULTS WZ 4 Z aW a W g g o aS5� $AMPLE NUYBER MO OFSCRIPTION OF MATERIAL b ₹ c i u 8� LC- \'2 " H.ri M i w.- 3 w r1 o W el In z g — 1 - — •• •♦•♦, . (0.0-1.0') Stiff, yellowish brown. (10YR 5/9), silty ��• CLAY, Sfgntly calcareous, (CL), roots. tlanp, fiLL ♦�♦; •♦•♦•1 (1.0'-3A') Stiff, yellowish brown. (10YR D/6), • ••• • CLAYEY SILT, very calcareous, (ML), aromaFILL I CS — - — -... 4 — — - 6 -- 7 • ♦ • jj ♦�� ♦♦e•.•1 �•� ♦°* (3.0'-4.3') Stiff, y♦UOwlsh brown. (10YR 5/6), CLAYEY SILT, very calcareous, (ML), damp. FILL • ♦ i� (4.5'-S.O') Trash (3.0'-8.0') StiFf, yellowish brown, (10YR 3/6), CLAYEY SILT, very calcareous. sane trash, (ML). clamp, mu_ CS — _ - _ — - ,—CLAYEY 9 10 — 11 — 12 13 (8.0'-13.0') Stiff, brownish yellow, (IDYR 6/6), SILT, very calcareous, damp, (ML) CS _ — — - — - — 0 e 0 _ 14 — 3.0'-18.0') Stiff, brownish yellow, (10YR 6/6), (1 L) CLAYEY SILT. very calcareous. damp. (M „ CS — — — — e 0 •7.3 CLei 44 K a' S., .1 Q C3 931061 SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE NAME ANO LOC�ATON ( WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL GREELEY, COLORADO Nortnxq. 370,688.01. EastAg. 2193,887.48 DATUM NGVD EI.EVATON 4759.27 ORI ME'1b0: 425' to. 823' an BOResC .c. HOLLOW STEM AUCER SG -9 SHEET SAMPLING WTao- CONTINUOUS SAMPLE BARREL 2 OF 3 IMLUNG START FINISH NATE)t LGVF7. 2x'67 r THE TUE 114E 1625 WOO 1143 MK 4/28/92 GATE DATE CAS0/C Dern 3/23/92 3/23/92 DRILL RIG CHE-55 SURFACE COMMONS dry rat, barren ANC<E 90 BEARINC NA SAMPLE HAMMER NA - TEST RESULTS C 4 ji. rcL, eE 3 ; SAMPLE NUMBER AND DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL ti w p 8i I8 X uWr 3U M 1 p y _— 16 - - 17 CS = -_ - 16 - ...a-19 r—-. - -- 20 — — 21 - -. - —22 '. -_ - <18A'-18.7') Stiff, brownish yeltor, (lOYR 6/6). CLAYEY SILT, very Calcareous. damp. (NI,) <la.T-20.5') Highly weathered. extremely weak moderate yellowish brown, (10YR 3/4), silty F. SANDSTONE, weakly stratified r little Oe oxide staining, CK noncatcareous, dry to damp stDRO, WEATHERED (20.3'-22.1') Highly weathered, extremely weak moderate yellowish brown. (10YR 3/4), ssty f. SANDSTONE. weakly stratified little ran oxide staining. noncolcareous. dry to damp. WEATHERED BEDROCK <22.1'-23.O') Hiy+ly weathered, extremely weak dusky brows (3YR 2/2). CLAYSTONE. noncateareous, - aonp, WEATHERED BEDROCK CS - - - - - -. -_ — - a 0 0 0 0 0 — 23 - - --- 24 - c — 25 - — 26 — 27 - (23.0'2BA') Highly weathered, extremely weak. moderate yellowish brown. <MOYR 3/4). silty F. SANDSTONE, weakly stratified little ron oxidf stameng, noncatcareous. dry to damn. WEATHERED BEDROCK CS - -- = _ 25 - 29 - (28.0'-33.0') Highly weathered extremely weak, moderate yellowish brown, (10YR 5/4), city F, SANDSTONE, weakly stratified, little iron oxide staining. noncalcareous. wet, WEATHERED BEDROCK CS -. — - - 0 0 0 z f - z O U 0 J M 15, O L, 8 r, M 0' O G3 O 0' u W 931061 SOIL BOREHOLE LOG STE NAME ANC LOCAnON WASTE SERVICES CORPORATICN CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL GREELEY, COLORADO Northing. 370.668.01 Costn+q' 2193.887.48 DATUM NGVD ELEVATION 473927 DRIWNC METHOD: 423' ID. 823' OD I BORING MO. HOLLDV STEM AUGER SG -9 I SHEET SAMPUNC I4ETIIDD; CONTINUOUS SAMPLE BARREL I 3 OF 3 DRILLING SP I START FRCSM WATER LEV+D. 2.67' TIME TIME TIME 1623 1000 1143 LATE 4/28/92 DATE DATE CASING DEPTH 3/23/92 3/23/92 DRILL RIG CME-53 I SURFACE CCNoff10N4 V'Y. AB. barren ANGLE 90 BEARING NA SAMPLE HAMMER NA - TEST RESULTS F Ll rz. i`< 9 w nw 2 '19 � 3 SAMPLE NUMBER AND DESCRIPTION OF MATERI�I ¢ w� O O U �� ,c,2,:6 k z ¢� K J 4 ] J N - 31 - 32 CS _ = - 33 --34 — 35 — 36 — 37 — 38 -- 39 — 40 —41 - 42 I— 43 44 TOTAL DEPTH • 33.D rt. — — — — _ — A i z z P 0 CJ At a N AI PI O oO 931061 SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE NAME ANC LOCATION WASTE SERv'C ES CORPORATION CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL GREELEY, CCLCRAD4START Northing, D71.188.36 Fasting, 2.193,897,75 OATUM NGVD ELEVATION '792.20 ORILUNC NETOO; 425' Ia 325' CD deRINC NO. NCLLCV STEM AUGER W-10 SHEET S'WPUNC '(1100' CONTINUOUS SAMPLE HARREL 1 or 4 ORIwNO nwv+ WATER EVEL L 25.59' THE I TIME TIME 1620 t ( 1515 1830 DATE '4/28/92 ' DATE DATE CASINO DEPT ` 3/26/92 3/26/92 DRILL RIG CME-55 i SURFACE CONOITICNS ANGLE 90 BEARING NA ` SAMPLE HAMMER NA DEPTH N FEET (ELEVgIOH) ?Tv RESutTS Itrc. 3 �� SAMPLE NUMBER AND OESCKIPTION Of MATERAL i 5 A C -If < t.' cQ� N W W ti 3V _ M 1 — 2 (0.0'-0.7') Asphalt pavement (0.7'-2.5') FILL (2.5'-3.0') Very stiff, ,moderate yellowish brown t O CS _ _ - _ — - 3 (IDYR 5/4), sHty CLAY, ca1Carvova, damp. (CL) '- — 4 5 sw.- 6 — 7 — (3,0'-5.0') St,PC, moderate yellowsh Drown, (IOYR 5/4), CLAYEY SILT, very Calcareaus, danp, (MO <5.0'-8.09 Highly weathered, extremely weak, mterlpnmoted. dark yellowish orange, (10YR 6/6), - slily F. SANDSTONE and medium dark gray, (N4), CLAYSTCNE, npnCalCareous, iron oxide s<p,n+nq gypsum, -657. Claystone, danp, VEATHERED HCDRCCK O CS - — -• — - 8 9 -10 - - 11 C — 12 — 13 -_ —14 _ _ (8.0'-13.0') highly weathered, extremely weak, m terl anlnated, dark yellowish orange, (t0YR 6/6). slty F. SANDSTC. and ( NEaxon gray, dark a(N4). CLAYSTCNE. nonculCareovs, mon oxide stainx'g, 9YOsun. • 95Z C(aystone, danp. VEATM£RED 3EDRCCx - _ - <13.0'-18,0') Highly weathered. extremely weak, ,nteroedded, dark yellowish orange, (1OYR 6/6). - slty 9, SANDSTONE, and nedkun dark gray, (NE), CLAYSTCNE. noncalcartous, :ran oxide staining gypsum. .631, Claystone, dpnO. VEATMERED HCDRCCK ® CS --- 0 CS _ - - - Z!-- - __- _ — — - — _ 0 0 0 O w < at 931061 SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE NAME AND LOCATION DRILLING MET1400: 425' ID, 825' OD BQRSCC r40. IOLLOV STEM AUGER SG -l0 SHEET WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION SAMPUNO METHOD CONTINUOUS SAMPLE BARREL 2 of • CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL amwNc GREELEY, COLORADO START FINISH Nortningl 371,188,36 Easing, 2,193,897.73 WATER LEND. 26.5.9,I GuE TIME TIME 1620 1515 1890 DATE 4/29/921 DATE art DATUM 'CVO ELLVATION •792.20 CASING DEPTH I I 1 3/26/92 3/26/92 DRILL RIG CME-55 SURFACE CONDITIONS ANGLE 90 BEARING NA SAMPLE MANNER NA &OW/ ¢Ia. ON SAMPLER (RECC\ RT) TEST RESULTS X- Z< r � 8V SAMPLE NUMBER AND DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL a ₹ u a y 3� �S < i� V K = i8 K a „, "' -- '7 ;_ CS _ — - 0 0 0 - 19 - — 19 _ 20 _ 21 -22 - (18A'-242') NIg1iy weathered. extrenely weak, Inttrloninated. dark yellowish orange. (IOYR 6/6), _ silty F. SANDSTONE. and neck" dark gray, (N4), CLAYSTCNC. noncaLCareovs, iron oxide !taming, Gypsy" -657, Claystone, damp. WEATHERED BEDROCK — ^_ Q cs _' _ -- _ — a 0 e — 23 ,--- 24 ' �r (24.2'-24.8') Highly weathered, extrenely week, - '.nterloninated, dark yellowish orange, (LOYR 6/6), silty F. SANDSTONE, noncalcareOus, 'toll oxide Staining, gypsy, damp WEATHERED BEDROCK —_ — __ -- 25 — 26 — — 27 y .�.4:. (24.9'-25.2') SUgntly weathered, nedlun strong, grayish red, (lOR 4/2) to light gray, (N7), CALCRETE/FCPRICRETC, very calcareous (25.z-29.09 Highly weathered, extrenely weak. ,nterlonnated. dark yellowish Orange, (1OYR 6/6),— silty F. SANDSTONE and nediun dark gray, (N4),— CLAYSTCNE, nonca(careous, Iron oxide sta 4.4O, gYPsun, -657. Claystone, damp, WEATHERED BEDROCK O CS — _ r 0 0 0 _ 28 29 !_ :�} 1.7 - (29.0'-33,0') Mlgnly weathered, extrenely weak, Interloninated. dark yellowish orange. (MR 6/6). silty F. SANDSTONE, and medium dark gray. (N4), LL CLAYSTCNE. noncalcoreous, ;ion o,ddn sta+rong. gypsy,. -65Z Claystone. damp WEATHERED BEDROCK O7 CS — — r oI :I NI P 2 O W -C C I- 1+ 931061 SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE NAME MtI0 LOCATION DRILLNC METHOD: 425' ID. 8.27' OD BORING NO. HOLLOW STEM AUGER SG -10 SHEET WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION SAHPUNG METHOD: CONTINUOUS SAMPLE BARREL 3 or 4 CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL pewit GREELEY, COLORADO START ?INSP. Northing. 371488.36 Earthy, 2193.897.75 WATER LEVEL 26,39' TIM C TIw[ TIME 1620 I 1515 1830 DAIS 4/28/92 I QATE 04TE DATUM NCVD ELEVATION 4792.20 CASING 0e114 i 3/26/921 3/26/92 DRILL RIG CME-55 SURFACE CONDITIONS ANGLE 90 BEAR!NC NA SAMPLE HAMMER Na DEPTH N FLU (L LEVILON) m 0 tSY? ,J0 1003/SM019 TEST RESULTS �— 7k �₹ 3 (.. 'u( , N SAMPLE NUMBER AND OCSCRIPIION OF MATERML 5 ce a a� }h x a 'n — - 31 - 32 -33 F r r-— CS — - _ 0 0 0 _ — 34 - _ _ 35 _ - 36 — 37 38 :ti c33.0'-38.0') Highly weathered. extremely weak, .'nterloninated. dark yellowish Orange, (LOYR 6/6), — silty F. SANDSTONE, and medium dark gray, (N4), _ CLAYSTONE, nonCalCarrOMs, iron oxide flaming, gypsum -G77. Cloystone. dorm, WEATHEIRED BEDROCK _ — © CS — - _ — - - = _— — — 39 — — — a6 - — 41 - 42 — 43 (38.0'-43.0') Highly weathered. extremely weak, nterlon,nated, dark yellowish Orange, ( lOYR 6/6), silty F. SANDSTONE, and nediMn dark gray, (N4), CLAYSTONE, noncalcareous, ton Oxide (staining, _ gypsvn. -637. Claystone, done, WEATHERED BEOROCX — — O CS — — __, — - — — — 0 0 0 - _ 44 - (43.0'-48.0') (Uglily weathered. ewtrenaly weak. nedeun yeltOwish brown, (10YR 3/4), silty F. SANDSTONE. weakly laminated. poorly cemented, nOnColcareOus, wet. WEATHERED BEDROCK CS — - — - - — z' WI W: WZ nj C G 0 8 Ent r, o. at at C 931061 • • SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE NAME AND LOCATION WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION CENTRAL VELD SANITARY LANDFILL GREELEY, CCLORADQ Northing 371.188.36 Costing 2,193,897.75 DATUM NCVO ELLVADON 479220 DRILLING MCTH00: 4.25' ID, 8.25' OD BORING Ho. HCCV STEM AUGER I.L SG -LO SHEET WAKING uETN00: CCNTtNLCuS SAMPLE BARREL 4 Of 4 OmwNC START FINISH WATER LLVLI. 26.79' I I I TAE nu( DK 1620 I I 1515 1830 OATS 4/28/92 041E DATE CASING DCPTM I 3/26/92 3/26/92 DRILL RIG CME-55 SURFACE CONDITIONS ANGLE 90 0EARINC NA SAMPLE 4AMMER NA DEPTH N (En (ELEVADON) wow /UN. ON SAMPLER (RECOVERY) 2 TEST RESULTS g g SAMPLE NUMBER MO DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS g PP F y OZ M Qw ;b se z Q 3 J = 6 — 46 46 _ 47 CS ,..... 49 - 49 50 51 - 52 - 5s - 54 - 55 — 56 — 57 - 58 _ 59 TOTAL DEPTH • 46.0 «. - _ -- — — r _ yZ V 331061 SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE NAME AND LOCATION VASTE SERVICES CORPORATION CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANOrILL GREELEY, COLORADO Survey data was not orov,ded because no Oaf Orobe was Instafied. DATUM NGVO ELEVATION 4789.90 DRILLING METHOD: 425' ID. 0.23' CD BORING NO. NCLLCV STEM AUGER SG -11 SHEET SAMPLING MCUOD: CCNTTNUOUS SAMPLE BARREL 1 or 3 oprianc START PIMSM WATER MVO. THE TIMC DIAL 1400 Rai DATE GTL GTE CASING DEPTH , 3/23/92 3/25/92 DRILL RIG CME-55 sURncE CDNDMONB dry, barren, embankment f (i ANGLE 90 9E.R'C NA SAMPLE HAMMER NA &G'MS/1GOT GN OSItC TEST RESULTS t,.., = ^ y v Lk rcr, \ h n „., a Yam— e( & (3 SAMPLE MVMDFR AND OESCRiFTION of MATERIAL O ₹ w ; �l ✓JJ5 M W W t8 3V H IS $ j N _ g _ 1 -- - 2 (0A' -3.O') StrPF, yeldwish brown. (10YR S/A), CLAYEY SILL T, very Calcareous, don0. ''SILL O CS - — ,- -CLAYEY 6 S 6 7 - g t3,0' -8A9 Stiff, yellowish brown (1OYR 3/A), SILT. very calcareous.ry. r:LL O GS - 10 11 _ 12 - t3 \ \ SILTY CLAY and F. SAND, very calcareous,— omapeneous, iano, (CO \ (8.0'-13.0') Stiff, yellowish brown, (10YR 5/4), \ homogeneous, S CS 2 0 0 0 — — r14 — (13.0'-18.0') Stiff, yellowish brown, tiOYR 3/4). CLAYEY SILT, trace F. Sand, very calCareOus, homogeneous, wet, (ML) O CS — W 147 J z I- yZ IX tA a: O 0 • c W O C 2 O 931061 • SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE NAME AND LOCATION DRILUNC METHOD: 4.23' :a 923. OD 80ReaS N0. HOLLOW STEM AUGER SC -11 SHEET WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION 544191-01GMETOO: CONTINUOUS SAMPLE BARREL 2 or 3 CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL f f DRILLING GREELEY, COLORADO START nwLl Survey data woo not provided beCauee was installed. WATER LEVC. I I MAC TIME no gas probe TIME' 1 1400 1343 DATE I 1 DATE DATE DATUM NGVp ELEVATION 4789.90 USING DEPTH 1 3/23/921 7/23/92 DRILL RIC CME-53 I SURFACE CONORIONS dry barren, embankment Enl ANGLE 90 PEAKING NA SAMPLE MANNER NA all TEST RESULTS 4 p AWN 1)- O. ≥ ffi3il SAMPLE NUMBER AND DESCRIPTIONOr MATERUL O ₹ ce a 1y.r 6 t1 o Z alO M ua r3 le 3 _-16 - —17 CS - _ —18 - - —19 - 20 - - 21 - — —22 :. _ L (18.0'-20.0') stiff. yr(lOwish brown, (10YR 5/4), CLAYEY SILT. trace F. Sand, very calcareous. homogeneous. wet. (ML) (20.0"24.0') Highly weathered. extremely weak. _ •nterlommated, dark yellOwism orange, (IDTR 6/6). silty P. SANDSTONE, Iron Oxide staaNng, gypsum, noncatcereous, and medium dark grey, - (N4), CLAYSTONE. noncalcareoue. wet, WEATHERED BEDROCK CS - - - - � - - 0 0 0 — 23 -24 - - — 25 — - 26 _— 27 _ <24.0'-28.0') Sane as above, except CLAYSTONE domMont (707.) —a _ —' © y —,., - - — _ — _— 28 - - 29 (28.0'-33.0') No recovery - >- 1 • • SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE NAME AND LOCATION WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL GREELEY, COLORADO Survey data was not provided because no gas probe was Installed. DATUM NGVD ELEVATION 4789.90 DRIWNG METHOD: 4.23' ID. 827' OD 80RiNG NO. HOLLOW STEN AUGER SG -II SHEET SAMPLING 11EII/00: CONTINUOUS SAMPLE BARREL 3 or 3 DmLUNG START FRKM WATER LEVEL TIME TaIE TIME TIME 1400 1343 DATE GATE DATE CASING DEPTH I 3/23/92 3/23/92 DRILL RIG CME-33 I SURFACE CONDITIONS dry, barren, embankment FE ANGLE 90 SCARING NA I SAMPLE HAMMER NA DEPTH fi iFEI (ELEwM OII) di TEST RESULTS ticbSAMPLE 3'x§ ,J`Y" u' NUMBER M 0 DESCRIPTION OF MA?ERIAL o 5 Y S Iin 5 M ¢r i. M 2 G j J n, T 'Ti J —S1 - — — 32 O CS - - — — 33 — 34 — 35 — 36 - 37 — 38 — 39 _ 40 —41 — 42 - 43 — 44 — TOTAL DEPTH n 33.0 Ft. - — — — — — — — ml o, P. C Z CD C y ' � I fIIK'D By " i(RSI m m W 931061 SOIL BOREHOLE LOG sin NAME AND LOCATION WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL GREELEY, COLORADO Northing 371,952.67 Casting 2,194,040.82 DATUM NCVD ELEVATION 4796.99 OR0y1NC MET+00: 4.23' IA S.23' CD I BORING NO. MOLLCV STEM AUGER SG -I2 9411, SANPUNC METN00: CONTTIUCUS SANPLE BARREL 1 0r 3 OR INN, sTART PCA I WATER a1 13.23' I TIME TIME TIME 1630 r 1700 1815 CATE 4/28/92 I DATE (SATE CASING PEPTN 1 I 3/25/92 3/23/92 DRILL RIO CME-55 I SURrACt CONDITIONS Dry. graSS•COvered ANGLE 90 etARINC NA SAMPLE HAMMER NA ffi TEST RESULTS §N �2 sz S� YI 8.".' Iz.. 1ST p i G ffi E zr. 8 SAMPLE NUMBER AND DESCRIPTION or want 2 g ' ,5q1 u - " 0 3 _N z ea w ti i 0 N - 1 - - Z - 3 (0.0'-35') $tiff, yellowish brown, (IOW 5/4), CLAYEY :ILT, very calcareous. roots (0.0'-0.5'). tlanp 0 Cr. _..._ - - - - - - 4 - — 5 — 6 -8 (3.5'-8.3) Highly weathered, extremely weak, _ Interbedded, Pars yellowish orange, MVP 6/6). silty f. SANDSTONE and dark neyun gray. a5), CLAYSTONE, rcnCatCa0)(447reous, iron 0)(447sta:nmg, gypsum, tlanp, VEPTHERED BEDROCK - O Cs ..._, .-.- - - - - - - 0 0 n - — 9 -- _ I - — I1 --12 13 - - - - - - -•- -- - (8.5'-13.5') Sane as above, except grades to greater percentage of Cloystone <-75Y.). 'ron oafs staining - at joints in Claystone. one prOnment subver4Ca1 joint • O Ct _ - - - - _ - — 0 0 0 - - 14 - _- (13.3'-'19.5') Sane as above. exCeot 95% Claystone, - -70' reactors, gypsum -filled 18.0-L9.0'. . a CS - - yW a 0 U 0 z J O3 0 a m a C7 N VI NI 4.3 • • SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SDE NAME AND LOCATION DRILLING METHOD: 4.23' 10, 8.23' CD eORiNC NO. 'snow 27EM AUGER I SG —L2 SHEET WASTE SERVICES CCRPCRATICN SAMPUNC ACTNOO' CENT1N000S SAMPLC BARREL I 2 or 3 CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL GawNC GREELEY, CCLCRADO 7ir I nwsN Not -Shoo, ]71.932,67 Eastrg, 2,194,040.82 SISTER LEVEL I3�"S' i I Tait i Du( TIME 1630 I 1700 1815 t DAt 4/28/92 DATE OATS LNTUM NGVD ELEVATION 4796.98 CASwc PERMj 3/25/92 3/25/92 DRILL RIG CME-33 i sunVAAi CONDITIONS Dry. grass -covered ANGLE 90 DEARING NA SAMPLE NAMNER NA 1 m USnw tal TEST RESULTS I': Z:c ry: W O ] i�O 00 ,, !iAMPLE NUMBERAND DESCRIPTION OR MATERNL W o. --t. �_ as Ww .. If p_ 3 J _N — 16 — 17 _ EJ — — t✓3 - 19 — 20 - -2t _ 2z - ' ;.;'•� (18.3'-22A') San* as above — = (22,0'-23.5') Sane as above, except grades to 70% _ Sandstone cs ...r0 — — — - 0 0 23 — .. 2s — 25 - - 25 - 27 s - (23.3'-28.3•) saes. as above. gradto -41 SANOSTONC/CLAYSTCNE - — © CS -- - — - 0 0 0 - 28 — - 29 - — (28.3'-33.0') Sane as above. except 637. CLATSTONE O CS — - - — I 0 U 8 of NI ni P• C c 931061 SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE NAME AND LOCATION WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION CENTRAL VELD SANITARY LANDFILL GREELEY. COLORADO NOP-thing 371,972.67 Eacting 2,194,040.82 DATUM NGVD ELEVATION 4796.99 OReWNC Et7NoO: 425' IA 825' DD BORING NO. NLov STEM AUGER CL SG -I2 SHEET Swot -NC MCD100: GENTINUDUS SAMPLE BARREL 3 OF 3 DRRyING START flM5N WATER WCL 1525'MC TIME DAC 1630 I 1700 1815 DATE 4/28/92 I d DATE DATE CASING DEPTH I 3/25/92 3/25/92 GRILL RIC CME-55 I SURFACE CoNommoNS Dry, Oran -covered ANGLE 90 BEARING NA SAMPLE HAMMER NA B&c ws/rxrt On CASINO TEST RESULTS it". 'b( L., e� 5 --.. 8 3 w it a- 2 N SAMPLE NUMBER AND DESCRIPTION OF AMTERML < a q P K efw s3/ 0 Vj 31 - 32 - a = _ 33 - 34 - 33 - 36 —37 -S8 _— 39 40 41 - 42 - 43 — 44 TOTAL DEPTH • 33.0 Ft. _ - — —' — _, — _ _ N W Lai o o gi z 0 LI C) J G I OO WI 0 u 8 a:l 0 5,' 931061 C NI SOIL BOREHOLE LOG sic NAME ANO LOCATION ORIWNC METHOD: 4.25' to 8.25' OD 00RwG N0. HOLLOW STEM AUGER SG -L3 I SHEET WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION SAMPLING MEngO: CONTtNUCUS SAMPLE BARREL I 1 or 3 CENTRAL, WELD SANITARY LANDFILL gRRUMC GREELEY, CCLCRADC I 'TART NS, Northing, 371,945.38 Casting, 2,193,344,40 WATER LEVEL 18.0' ' i INC TIME TIME 0913 I I 830 1013 GATE 13/26/9E I DATE OATS DATUM NGV➢ ELEVAnoS 4803.63 CASING 004104 ( ! i 3/26/92 7/26/92 ORILL RIG CME-53 I SURFACE GNOMONS OrY, spars! grass AN= 90 BEAR,NC NA SAMPLE HAMMER NP DEPTH N EEEE (ELCVQ,ON) et ow/ Litt ON SAMPLER (RECOVERY) $ TEST RESULTS r( SAMPLE NVMBER AN➢ OESCRIPTiON OF MATERIAL o Y S a k - s V `'A O W < 3V re - o j - - 1 _ 9 L nn 3 <0.0'-3.0') Stiff, brownish yellow, (IOYR 6/6), CLAYEY SILT. trace f. Sand, very calcareous. damp, (p0 (3.0'-4.0') Stff, brownish yellow. (LOYR 6/6), CLAYEY 111L11, trace f. Sand, very Calcareous. danp. `"L) Ol C - _ -, - - — — — 4 — _ .-.. 5 — 6 — — — i — 8 — - 9 - 10 — 11 — - - ,--- 12 - 13 - - — - (4.0'-5.(") Highly weathere0, extremely weak, .nterlaninated, dark yellOwisn orange, (10YR 6/6). Silty P. SANDSTONE. can Oxxse Stolnng. and dark medium ray, (N4), CLAYSTCNE. slightly Calcareous, damp WEATHERED BEDROCK (5.0'-8.0') Highly weathered, extremely weak, moderate yellowish brown. (10YR 5/4), silty f. SANDSTONE, poorly cemented. Clean. WEATHERED BEDROCK <8..0'-9, 2') Highly weathered, extremely weak, noderote yellowish brown, (LOYR 5/4), silty f SANDSTONE. poorly cemented, clean, WEATHERED BEDROCK gypsum layer at 9.2' (9.2'-10.0') Highly weathered. extremely weak, ,nterlaninated. dark yellowish orange. (10YR 6/6). silty f. SANDSTONE, eon oxide stain,ngs and dark -emu, gray. (N4), CLAYSTCNE, slightly Calcareous, clomp, WEATHERED BEDROCK (10.0'-11.2') Highly weathered. extremely weak, noderote yellowish brown, (10TR S/4). Silty F. SANDSTONE. poorly cemented. near. WEATHERED BEDROCK Qy05un layer at 1L2' (ii.c"-12.0') Highly weathered. extremely weak, interion,noted, dark yellowish orange, (10YR 6/6), silty f. SANDSTONE, iron oxide MINN} and dark -odium gray, (NU, CLAYSTCNE. slightly calCar-ous, damp WEATHERED BEDROCK (12A'-13.0') Highly weathered, extremely weak, moderate yellowish brown. (l0YR 5/4), silty F. SANDSTONE. VEATHER[➢ BEDROCK O CS ...— 0 CS — —' — — —, — — _, — _ — - — — �. - 0 0 0 _— — — --+ 14 — — — _ padrly Cemented. clean, (13.0'-19.0') Highly weathered, extremely weak, ,nterlon,nated. dark yellowish orange, (10YR 6/6). city f.. SANDSTONE eon oxide staiang, and dark — nemun gray. (Na). CLAYSTCNE, slightly calcareous, damp WEATHERE➢ BEDROCK LL talk, SANDSTONE/CLAYSTCNE O CS —_ — — — 0 0 0 'I mi 0" O CO G s 931061 SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE NAME ANO LOCATION WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL GREELEY, COLORADO Northing, 371,943.38 Castag, 2,193,544.40 DATUM NCV 0 ELEVATION 4905.63 ORILLINC METCO: 4.23' D. 8.23. 0D BORING NO. HOLLOW STEM AUGER SG -13 SHEET SAMPLING UETM00: CONTINUOUS SAMPLE BARREL 2 OF 3 DRILLING START i1WSM WATER LEVEE 18.0' I TIME TIME TIME 0973 I 830 1013 DATE 3/26/9E j art GATE 01504 GUN I 3/26/92 3/26/92 DRILL RIG CME-55 I SWAGE CONOEOONS DrY, soars. grows ANGLE 90 OEARINC NA I SAMPLE HAMMER NA TEST RESULTS 13— z T, . tat 4rc^ ,q L'c, . >< o g SAMPLE NUMBER AND CESCRIPf10N OF MATERMI i{ u C ,'J{ pp - N ,,,=, LS K i G _ `u = 16 - 17 1 — CS _ _ - 18 — - — 19 — — - zo _ -- 21 — 22 (18.0'-230') Mghly weathered. exVerely weak, interlanlnatea. bark ye0owlsn orange. (10YR 6/6). _ wl(ty g. SANDSTONE. iron oxide ftaning, and du•My brawn (5YR 2/2), CLAYSTONE. noncolCar.OM%. gypsum. damp. WEATHERED BEDROCK (percentage of CLAYSTONE increases with death) _ — 22'-23. 70' Ceacture, gypsum-'IIod —� 0 CS - - — -. _ - _ a 0 a 0 0 0 — 23 — 24 ^23 — — — 26 — 27 - (23e.0'-28.0') Sane as above, slight Acreas. +' 7. Q centage of Sandstone (40ays1'oae) r_ — (280'-33,07 San. dw above. exC.Ot Sandstone a O cS 44!—pr — — — — — — — 28 — -- 29 - dOnmant (.607. Sanastone) Cs — _ — ca z O U U J C 21 O C7 8 CO NI PI OD 0 W C 17, 0 C SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE NAuE AND LOCATION WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL GREELEY, COLORADO Nor thing, 37194348 COStripl 2,193.544, 40 DARN NGVD ELEVATION 4803.63 DRILUNC METH00; 4.25' ID. 823. OD BORING M. HOLLOW STEM AUGER SG -13 , '<ET SAMPUNO u6T'00: CCNTTNJOUS SAMPLE BARREL 3 or 3 DRTLUND START I rtwsM WATER LEVt1 18.0' I TIME TIME TIME 0913 I 830 1015 DATE 3/26/92 OATS I DATE CASING OEMIM 1 3/26/92 3/26/92 DRILL RIG CME-03 SURFACE CONDITIONS Dry spur so grass ANGLE 90 BEANINC NA SAMPLE HAMMER NA $ TEST RESULTS C. r 4 Z q F J Ace, X>a O O-'/ +� r6 SAMPLE NUYBER AND DESCRIPTION OF MATERUL 0 ₹ rx, a L U 3, 8? \V M 7 u M s ° J '^ N 7 = 31 = 32 — - 33 = 34 35 — 36 -- 37 — 38 — 39 _- 40 — 41 — 42 - —43 -- 44 TOTAL DEPTH • 33.0 Et. - - — — — - — J — z 0 U U -74 O N Al U" 0 ra 0 931061 SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE NAME AND LOCATION WASTE SERVICES CDRPCRATTCN CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL GREELEY, CCL0RADC Northing, 371,506.76 Casting. 2.193.616,98 DATUu NCVD ELEVATION +803A+ DRIUINC 11ETHo0: 4.25' W. 9.25' OD ' DOR!NC No, HOLLOW STEM AUGER SG `S , SHEET SNARLING C400 CONTINUOUS SAMPLE BARREL I 1 or 3 I omLUNp START FINISH WATER LL1tL 31.0' I nuE TIME INC 1100 1I 930 I1+3 DATE 3/27/93 i i DATE DATE G SAG WM.^a^° 1 1 1 3/27/92 ! 3/27/92 DRILL RIO CME-53 I SURFACE CONDITIONS DAY. sparse grass ANGLE 90 9UR!NC NA I SAMPLE HAMMER NA BLOWS/1001 ON CASINO TES RESULTS 1-^ W& Wit W 4150 .a1e3 °- N SAMPLE NUMBER ANDp DESCR!PfION OF MATERIAL1 m jn G K cc,- K o w N 1 - _ 2 C0.0'-3.0'> •Stdt, brownish yellow, <IOYR 6/6), CLAYEY at very ColCar.ouc roots. clomp. (ML) (3,0'-3.5') Stiff, brownish yellow. C1OYR 6/6), 1 O CS - - - — _— 3 - — 4 - — 5 — 6 - - CLAYEY SILT, very calcorrous. roots. dono, (MU <3.5'-0.0') Loose. yellow. UDYR 7/9), very weakly stratified. SAND, strongly calcareous, little Sat. dry, (SM) (8.0'-G.2') Loose, yellow, <MOYR 7/8), very weakly stratifies& SAND, Strongly CalCareous, little Sot. O CS _.0 - — - - 0 0 8 - g - - = 10 - — 1 1 12 -- - - — — — _ dry, (SW <8.2'-13.0') kighly weathered, extremely weak, •:nterlon,nateaL dark yellowish orange, (IOYR 6/6). sat}, F. SANDSTONE and clerk meows ray. (NA), CLAYSTCNE. nOncalcareovs, gypsum, damp WEATHERED BEDROCK -1.1 ratio CLAYSTCNE/SANDSTONE (13.0'-19.0') Sane as above. except percentage of O3 CS k., - — -, — — _ 0 0 0 13 — 14 _ - ,—CS Cloystone increases to -707. 77-1 _ — z vV( ye ti OD C W O of 0( W i' CO C • - I 931061 SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE MANE AND LOCATION DRILLING METN00: 42r ID. 827. OD 90eNG NO. SG MOWN STEM AUGER I I SHEET WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION SAMPLING MLTOO' CONTINUOUS SAMPLE BARREL 2 of 3 CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL GREELEY, COLORADO I DARLING START --- AMISS NortnmCi 371.706.76 EaSTAg, 2.193.616.98 email WT. 31,0' TIME Ng nut 1100 I 930 1147 GATE 3/27/9a I DATE GATE oATUM !CVO ELEVATION 4©03.04 CASING OEPTM none 7 3/27/92 3/27/92 DRILL RIG CME-73 SURFACE CONDITIONS Dry, sparse crass ANGLE 90 BEARING NA SALABLE MANNER NA a RSt RESULTS t,^ Zsil t� v .., �� i W �0 8 g SAMPLE NUMBER MO DESCRIIMON Of MATERIAL ₹ rc W C 1 `�y �2 O " w� ~ -, O 2 O g - 16.r - 17 18 - C; — _ —I9 20 - -21 -22 — 23 - —24 2s - — 25 - 27 — 28 49.0'-25.6'1 SAne as above. encePt Percentage of Ctaystone ;ncreases to -9S: - <27.6'-29.0'1 Sane as above, except percentage of — Ctaystone ;s -637. — (290'-30.0') Crapes to 907. Sanaston, as awn �V OS CS _. ® CS — — _ - - - - _ - — — 0 o 0 a 0 a —_- 29 — _ 0 CS — - C e- C U LS C O a. V a VI lI 1 N CP 42, 931061 • SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE NAME AND LOCATION I DRILLING METHOD: 4.23' ID. 8.2t 0D BORING No. HOLLOW STEM AUGER 'C'' -I4 SHEET WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION SAMPUNO 40100: CONTINUOUS SAMPLE BARREL I 3 oc 3 CENTRAL VELD SANITARY LANDrILL calwNc GREELEY, COLORADO START FINISH Northing, 371.506,76 East'Agi 2,193,616.98 WATER ltM'1 3L0' I Om(THE THE 1100 930 1143 DATE :I/27/9 OATS I WEgm)/NOME.ELEVATION 4803.04 USING 0E177)1 I One I j 3/27/921 3/27/92 DRILL RIG CME-33 SURFACE CONDITIONS Dry s3arse grass ANGLE 90 BEARING NA SAMPLE HAMMER NA EAOW/ 5Jti ON SAPPIER (RECOVERY) TEST RESULTS P} Lri yyy N SAMPLE NUMBER DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL i ON o K u e '- o-. I +! _ - 31 - ,� — 32 33 - - -- 34 35 _- — 36 - 37 '.'.r _ _ - _ - _ (30.0'-J0.. 3') CA! -CRETE (JC.3'-J3r) Nlg'nly weathered, ex trenely +eek, .nterlonmated, Oark yellowdn Orange, (IOYR 6/6). Saty F. SANDSTONE, and dark medium gray. (N4), CLAYSTCNE, noncalcarevus. gypsum. damp. wEATHEPED 3EORCCK ell rato CLAYSTCNE/SANDSTCNE 133.0'-34.5') H,gmly weathered. extremely weak, '.nterlorena!ed, dare yellowish orange. (OYR 6/6). silty F. SANDSTONE. and oork nealun gray, (N4). CLAYSTCNE, noncaleareous. gypsum, damp. WEATHERED BEDROCK (34.3'-33A') Completely weathered, extremely weak, dark gray. (N3). CLAYSTCNE, very plastic nonCaIcareOeS. done, WEATHERED BEDROCK (33,0'-35.3') Highly weathered. extremely weak. interlar,ated. dark yellowish orange. (10YR 6/6). silty F, SANDSTONE, and dark medium gray, (N4), CL WEATHERED DEDRCCKreous, gypsum. dam), I:1 ratio CLAYSTCNE/SANDSTONE (335'-38.0'> Mighty weathered. extremely weak. interla'+noted, dare yellowish orange, (10NR 6/6), silty F. SANDSTONE find dark medium gray, (NA>, CLAYSTONE, ndnCalC0reOM5, gypsum, 00mp WEATHERED BCDROCK CD �^ CS m. _ — — _ 0 0 n 0 0 0 — 38 _ 39 -- 40 — 41 — 42 43 44 -1.1 ratio CLAYSTCNE/SANDSTONE TOTAL DEPTH $ 28.0 N. J J _ J. CPENCCMS 0 ccD O of 01 a. fm m -3 0 C w 931061 SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE NAME AND LOCATION DRILLING MCTHOO: 423' :D, 825' CD BMRING NO, HOLLOW STEM AUGER SG -`S �+_---• 5MEET WASTE SERVICES CDRPCRATION SAMPIJNG METMCO, CONTINuOUS SAMPLE BARREL 1 or 3 CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDrILL ZREELEY, COLORADO Datoc START i1MSN Northing, 371.328.62 Fasting? 2,193,90424 WATER I.EVI:L T 26.0' j TIME Tim( TIME 1330 j 1215 1400 OATS 3/26/90 I CATC OA(E (Amy NGVD ELEVATION 479126 CASING OFPP+ j 1 3/26/92 1 7/26/92 GRILL RIG CHE-33 i 5VRFACE CONDITIONS Gravel driveway ANGLE 90 °EARN NA I SAMPLE HAMMER NA �' di TEST RESVLTS wQz ji a'^ lsi \O _, y SAMPLE NVuOFR Of5CRIPTiON OF MATERIAL es cc i a t th 8` O W y .- O J N - 1 _- -3 _ 4 - - kw 5 6 - - 7 — 8 - (0.0(_0..) FILL. <O,5' -3.T) FILL. (3.7'-40') StunF, brownisn yellow, (WYE' 6/6). CLAYEY SILT, Calcareous. <wtt due to adjacent Decor) oDeraton), (ML) (4,0'-$.0') Nighty wtatnel'vd, extremely weak, Aterianinated-interbedded. dark yt40wish Orange. (70YR 6/6), silty F, SANDSTCNC. medium dark gray. (N4) CLAYSTCNE slightly calcareous to nonCalcareoue. iron oxide staining, damp, WEATHERED BEDROCK -65y. Claystone 1 O CC — Q CS — — _ - 0 b 0 - - - 9 - _ 10 - - 1 1 '2 13 (&0'-13.0') Highly weathered. extremely weak. _ interlaninated-interbedded, dark yellowish orange, <LOYR 6/6), silty F. SANDSTONE, nedlun dark gray. <N4), CLAYSTONC slightly Calcareous to nenCalCarrous, iron - Oxide staining, damp, WEATHERED BEDROCK (!3.0'-:8.0') Nignly ,-_,b,,-_,b,-7 0 CS- i - - - — _ 0 0 a I A - . weathered, extremely weak, r ,nterloninoted-rnterbedded. rk yellow's orange, (1,OYR 6/6), silty E. SANDSTi^,`E, medium dark gray, (N4), LLAYSTC•NE slightly CoIcoreoks LO noncalcareout, iron oxide staring, gypsum, Bono, WEATHERED BEDROCK - 0 0 0 SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITt NAME. ANO LOCATION I ORILUNG METHOD: 4.25' :a 8,25' CD I BORING NO. HOLLOW STEM AUGER SG -IS i sIEEY WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION sAMPUNG kC O0 CCNTtNUCUs SAMPLE BARREL ( 2 of 3 CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL (mw< GREELEY, COLORADO START c1WSM Northing, 371.328.62 Easpng, 2.193.90624 WATER LEVEL 26.0' j ! TIME THE TIME 1330 i 215 1400 DAIS 13/26/921 DATE DATE DATUM NGVD ELEVATION 4793.26 CASING DEPTH I 3/26/92 3/26/92 DRILL RIO CME-5S I SURFACE CONDITIONS Gravel driveway ANGLE 90 OEARINC NA SAMPLE HAMMER NA I 1 TEST RESULTS St'-'-' W 3. t Cy).7. ,ojS W� col IA `-' �< g SAMPLE DV u9ER AND DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL o S i t \� ou M W.- M i o - 16 — 17 - 18 — i— (1e.D'-1a9') Hlgnly weathered. extremely weak. intertominated-interbedded, dark yellowish orange, (10YR 6/6). silty F. SANDSTONE and nedl,/n dark gray, CS — - - — - - — 19 - - _ 20 - — 21 21 - — 22 - - 23 I" - (N4), CLAYSTCNE vigor's calcareous to no„calCareOus. iran oxide starting, gypsum, damp. WEATHERED BEDROCK <18.9'-21.5') nighty weathered. extremely weak. dark yttlOw•sh Orange. (LOYR 6/6). silty F. SANDSTONE, nOncalcareous, weakly lammated, dan0, WEATHERED SEDRCCK (21.5'-23.O') (4.0'-8.0•) Highly weathered. extremely weak. mterlarsnated-interbedded. dark _ yellowish orange, <10YR 6/6), silty F. SANDSTONE and medium dark gray, <NA). CLAYSTONE, noncalcareouw, iron oxide staring, damp, WEATHERED BEDROCK Claystone �� a CS - --. - - - - _ - - - - - 0 0 _ - - 24 - 25 --(26.o'-28.D') — 26 - - 2i Y -657. (23.0"-26.0') Mighty weathered• extremely weak. dark yenOwiSh orange. (LOYR 6/6), salty F. SANDSTONE. noncaiCareOus. weakly laminated. dam). WEATHERED BEDROCK Highly weathered, extremely weak. interlan,nated-intl tedded. dark yellOwish orange. (10YR 6/6). silty f. SANDSTONE and nedkr dark gray, (N4), CLAYSTONE slightly ColCareous t0 nonealcoreous, iron - Oxide staring. damp, WEATHERED BEDROCK -65Y. Claystone `. <27.o•-27.7•) CALCRCTE © CS — ... - - - —_ — - — 0 0 0 - 28 (27.3'-33.0') Highly weathered, extremely weak, - _— - 29 - - interlaninated-Interbedded. dark yellowish orange• QOYR 6/6). silty F. SANDSTONE and medium dark gray, (N4). - CLAYSTONE slightly colCareous t0 nOnealCareOus. iron Oxide stain.trig, damp. WEATHERED BEDROCK (4 rraro Clay stone to Sandstone) - ^^' O CS -'-' - - - ci Mt 0"" O Cr G WI co N 0' a C 931061 SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE NAME AND LOCATION ORIWNG MEOIOD: 4.2Y 13. 023' On BORING NO. NCLLOV STEM AUGER SG -'1.5 SHEET WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION SAMPUNG METHOD! CONTINUOUS SAMPLE BARREL 3 of 3 CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL GREELEY, COLORADO omW„G START i1Nl$H NortINnO' 371.320.62 Costing, 2.193.906,24 HATER LEVEL 2G0' ' TEAL Time TIME 1330 ' 1213 1400 DATE 1 3/26/9221 DATC DArE DATUM NGVO ELEVATION 4793.26 CASING OSPTH l I3/26/92 3/26/92 DRILL RIG GME-55 SURFACE CONDmONS CroVel tlrIvt.ny ANGLE 90 BEARING NA SAMPLE MANNER NA 1F. I.E. TEST RESULTS ''' 4a.( _� zw aw �v 437 . o`� as 5'=- SAMPLE NUMBER AND DESCRIPTION OF IMTERUL n ₹ z a �. a� i �p 8Y i'� m H z w a R i _ S _ --31 — — 32 33 F — cc = - — 34 5 - 3— - 36 — 37 — 38 - 39 _- 40 '— 41 1-- 42 — 43 -- 44 TOTAL DEPTH • 33.0 Ft. — - — - — — �— - NI P! C co O 4_ 931061 SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE NAME AN0 LOCATION ORIU,INC METHOD: 423' ID. 923' CD I DORwC NO, MELLOW STEM AUGER i i SG -t6 SHEET WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION SAMPLING METHOD: CONTINUOUS SAMPLE BARREL 1 of 3 CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL GREELEY, COLORADO cfrI tluse START FNSN Nor thing) 371,947,19 Casting) 2192,982.09 WATER LEMEL no' I ME nue n4f 1413 I 1243 1430 BATE 3/27/921 l PATE i PATE DATUM NOVD ELEVAnON /818,76 CASING OE►TM j j 3/17/92 3/17/92 DRILL RIC CME-53 I SURFACE CONOInGNS Dry/non-vegetated ANGLE 90 9EARINC NA 1 SAMPLE HAMMER NA i TM RESULTS S7ae. 2 1V lx -u des— SAMPLANONMOER DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALce S� a - 6 3 is 3'� od d K 0.,r 7b su = A- 3 - x t b - 1 _ — — 2 3 (0.D' -3.D') Very ICase, brGwnsh yellow. (10YR 6/6). unStra4Fied. SAND. little Sit. acacolcareous, (SP) (3.0'-3.2') Loose. brawnier, (10YR 6/6), 1 O CS —� — — _— — d '_ 5 — - 6 7 S yellow. unstr tiF,ed. SAND, little SAT. noncalcartQus, (SP) (3,2'-6.0') Highly weathered, extremely weak, dark yellowisn orange, (1OYR 6/6), silty F. SANDSTONE. noncalCoreous. Iron oxide stoinwg, WEATHERED BEDROCK (6.0'-8,(7) Highly weathered. extremely weak. dark yellowish orange. CLOYR 6/6). Silty I. SANDSTONE — interbedded tot" completely weathered. extremely weak, dark medium 9ray. (N4), CLAYSTONE. noncodcarea,e, (960/ CLAYSTONE), WEATHERED BEDROCK Q— CS — — — — — — — — 0 0 0 — 9 _— 10 11 — — — 12 — — - 13 (8.0'-11.3') Nwohly weathered. extremely weak, dark _ yellowish orange, (IOYR 6/6). Silty I. SANDSTONE interbedded with Completely weathered. extremely weak, dark median ray, (NU, CLAYSTONE, nonCalCareovS, (-604 CLAYSTONC). WEATHERED BEDROCK - - (11.3'-13.07 Highly weathered. extremely weak. dark yellowish orange. (1OYR 6/6). silty I. SANDSTONE interbedded with completely weathervfcl extremely weak, dark medium gray. (NA). CLAYSTONE. _ noncalCareous. gypsum, (960'7. SANDSTONE), WEATHERED BEDROCK (33.0'-16.2') Highly weathered, extremely weak, CS —_ — - — — — — —_ - — 14 - moderate yellow's" brown. (10YR 3/q, silty 9, CANDSTONE noncaLcoreous. WEATHERED BEDROCK O Cr. - - 1 2 C 931061 •JI SOIL BOREHOLE LOG DRIUJNO METHOD. 4.25' 13. 8.25' on ' BORING NO. SITE NAuE AND LOCATION - HCLLOW STEP, AUGER SG -!5 , 1 SHEET WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION SAMPUNC METO0' CCNTSHuOUS SAMPLE BARREL I 2 OF 3 CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL ! ORIwNC GREELEY, CCLCRADO I f START I FINISH Northing. 371.947.19 Eastmgi 2.192982.09 WATER 334' I I j mac THE nME 1415 I I 1243 1430 OATS 3/17/921 I 1 DATE 1 0,42E DATUM NW() CLCVAnON 4619.76 CASING 3(Pfl I I 3/17/92 3/17/92 DRILL RIG CME-55 SURFACE CONOrON5 Dry/non-vegetated ANGLE 90 BEARING NA SAMPLE HAMMER NA - TEST RESULTS Ir- 44 9. W aW �� .IQ.- 'IIS- 33& ;vie Ow g r SAMPLE tivMBER OESCRIPTON OF MATERIAL as Y •¢, (a(+� 4 u 8.-' .N, 3(/ 84 K i ' ., <5 zy R ! p .., vi N a I6 - - v-- 17 - _ c 6.2'-; P,') Nighty weatherea. extremely weak, tla!•k yeliowsr. orange, (10YR 6/9). silty F. SANDSTONE. very tittle Clay. noncalcoreDvs. WEATHERED BEDROCK u7._'-t7J') Conpletely weathered. extremely weak, light gray. (N7), silt•/ F. SANDSTCNE. noncalcoreow9, WEATHERED BEDROCK dark CS - ^ ^ - - - - 0 0 a i— Ig - - - 19 - — 20 — —_ — 21 — 22 ss.23 (17.6'-19.0') Mighty weathered. extremely weak. - yellowish Orange, (10YR 6/9), silty F. SANDSTCNC. — noncalcareous, WEATHERED HEDRCCK (18.D'-23.07 Highly weathered. extremely weak, dark yellowish orange, (10TR 6/6). silty F. SANDSTONC Interovaaed with completely weathered. extremely weak, nark medium gray. (NA). CLAYSTCNE. — noncalcareous. WEATHERED HEDRCCK _ -607, Claystone Fr— L O CS �— - - — — ,- - — 0 0 0 24 — -- 25 = _ 26 27 -. IF_ r (23.0'-28.0') Mlghly weathered. extremely weak, dark yellowish orange. (10YR 6/6) to Ivy( gray, (N7). Alty 9. -aANOSTONE. with interbedded arid ,nterlaminated. Completely weathered. extremely weak, medium dprk gray, (Nil). CLAYSTCNE (-50X). both— noncalcareous, hoist, gypsum. WEATHERED BEDROCK _ O CS — _, - — - o b o 28 ... — - 29 - - (29.0'-0J n3') M;ghly weather!p extremely weak, dark _ yellows' orange. (IOYR 6/6) to light gray, (N7), 5.lty • SANDSTONE, with interbedded and ,nterl0-,nated. Completely weathered. extremely weak. medOA *lark gray, (NA), CLAYSTC.NE (.307.). weak Flss,O ty. both ngacalCareoks. foist. G7osw\ wCATI-_RED BEDROCK ti-- 0 CC - _ - — nI Ni SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE NAME AND LOCAnoN oRILUNC METMOo: 4.25' 13. 823' CD %genic N0. MCLLCW STEM AUGER SG -16 % CC WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION SAMPLING METHOD, CCNTMLICUS SAMPLE BARREL 3 or 3 CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL I OR1WNG GREELEY, CCLCRADC START FlWSM Northing' 371.947.19 COst:ng' 2.192.982.09 WATERtFVCL 3}0' I THE DUE nu[ 1413 1 I 1243 1430 GAGA 3/17/92 GATE arc atom NCVD ELEVAn0N 4818.76 CASINO OEMI 3/17/921 3/17/92 DRILL RIG CMC-53 I SURFACE C0N0R10N5 Ory/non-vegetatrd ANGLE 90 BEARING NA I SAMPLE MANNER NA T!ST 2ESUL?S C �4 s�1 a'.. 14, ¢ 0" 8 �a g g SAMPLE NUMBER AND DESCRIPTION CP MATERIAL � & V '- S , Iiii( •`< o; . M o:r � K 2 o j N = _-31 — — 32 - l CS - - -- "'-- 33 — - - 34 — - _ _ 35 — — 36 _ 37 (33.0'-38.0') Mighty weathered. extremely •weak. dark yellowish orange. (1OYR 6/6) to light gray, 047). sty P. SANDSTONE, with ,nterbedtled and Intertominated. COnotetely weathered. extremely weak, medium dark gray, (N4), CLAYSTONE 430X.), 2222 Pis%Illty, both nonCCleareous, moist, WEATHERED 2E3RCCH ® cs _ - — - - — _ - — -- _ — 38 = 39 - 40 . - 41 - 42 43 _ 44 TOTAL DEPTH a 38.0 rt. - - - - - - NI W Li Y CD 0 C, 8 m tmi c 931061 SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE NAME AND LOCATION DRI(,1)NC METHOD: 425' ID. 825' CC OCRIN NO. MCLLCV STEM AUGER SG -1.7 SHEET WASTE SERVICES CCRPCRATION SAAIRt1Np mam0D: CCNTINUDUS SAMPLE BARREL 1 OF 3 CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL oRlwNc GREELEY, COLORADO 1 `TART F1N5M Northing! 372272.54 2,192,769.98 WAT LEVEL I I TIME 111.4(EaStng, TIME -'30'34 1650 1300 11).5 DATE 4/,2,8/92 DATE DATE DATUM NGVD ELEVATION 4821,83 I CASING DEPTH 1 3/16/92 3/17/92 DRILL RIG CME-55 I SURFACE CONOITIONS Dry/non-veQetat.on ANGLE 90 SEARING NA I SAMPLE HAMMER NA 15 TES? PESULTS W$ Yu 3�E;S7 ,plop # O N SAMPLE NUMBERAND DESCRIPTION OF MATERNL 'p" S u „,, u a5 M W c, M a T g — — 1 — 2 II i (C.0'-3.0') St,P . dark yello+ish aeon,. (10YR 6/6), unstrat.f;pa, CLAYEY SILT, trace F. Sand. Strongly calcareous, damp. (ML) 0 CS —, — — _, 3 — - 4 S — 6 7 Stiff, c yellowan brown, (10YR 6/G), (3 A'-9.3') ork nstrat Fted, CLAYEY SILT, trace P. Sand, strongly C0lcareous. gypsum. damp. (ML) �— O CS — — - —_ — 0 0 0 — 8 - - — 9 - 10 — - 1 I C - 12 (8.0'-13.0') Loose. brownsh yrlow, (10YR 6/B). unstrattF,ed, SILT and P. SAND. trace Clay. nOncalC4reOVS, QypSun, dOn0. (ML-SM) ""- Q CS - - — w. - - _ -.— 0 0 0 13 - -- 14 - .. (13,0"15.0') Mlgnly weathered. extremely week, dark .. moderate yellowish brown, (:QvR 5/4), Ianenot'ed. , silty F. SANDSTONE, nonCalCareous. pant). VEATHERED 2EDRCCK O CS - — - = — v,' yyyt yyZ Si V� I- w 8 n NI nl T. ; 0' m C 921061 SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE NAME ANO LOCAPON ORIUJNC METHOD: 425' I2 625• CD PORING NO. LL NCCV STEM AUGER SG —1.7 sNEET WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION sAMPUNC WM00- CONTINUOUS SAMPLE BARREL 2 Oe 3 CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL ORIwNG GREELEY, COLORADO START MASAI Northing. 372,272.5• East.ngi 2.192.769.98 WATER !MRS 70.34' DYE 111.4E MAC 1 1650 1500 1115 DATE 14/28/92 DATE DATE DATUM NGV D ELEVATION 4821.85 CASINO GERM I I 3/16/92 3/17/9 ORO. RIO CME-55 SURFACE CONomoNs Dry/non-vegetation ANGLE 90 SEARING NA SAMPLE MANNER NA & TESL RESULTS CK1. _ sy aw S� o o� `-' 000 N SAMPLEANC YDERtd OESC.4IPYION o` mATERW. CC S y 3 SS.. \Z cC" 2g w �A 3s- 5 g 6 J N zz S - 16 — — 17 18 CS mmi - — — — - - 19 — — As —20 - —21 — 22 — 23 (18.0'-23.D') Nighty weathered. extremely week, moderate yellowish brown. (10YR 5/U. . s:1ty f, SANDSTONE. laminated. iron oxide stained with — .nterbedded. slightly calcareous. highly weathered. extremely weak, dusky brown. (5TR 2/2), Fissile CLAYSTCNE. nonCalCOrvOvS. gypsuh both damp. V ATMERED BEDROCK = (23.0'-28.O') 5 O CS — — _ — _ — 0 0 0 24 — — - 25 - 26 — 27 _ — 28 - - f' ?:_r Mlgnly weathered.' extre...Hy weak, moderate yellowish brown, (10YR 5/4), silty F. SANDSTONE. laminated. iron o$l,e staked. with .nteraeddea, slightly calcareous, highly weathered. extremely weak, dusky brown (SYR 2/2). fiCS.IQ CLAYSTONE, nonc0lcarrous. gypsum. both Clomp. VEATMERED BEDROCK - (29.0'- 33.0') Sane as Cs ---. — - z — _ _- - — C — o d _— 29 _ above, except a greater of CAYSThTO Percentage LONE than SANDSTONE more f,ssaL better „Ourated. _ C CS — _ — UI iJ 1 =f N1 7.I 0 z 05 O of 931061 • SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE NAME AND LOCATION ORILUNG METHOD: 4.23' IA 0.25' OD GORING NO. MELLOW STEM AUGER I SG -17 SHEET PASTE SERVICES cQRPCRATtCN sAMVUMC METMOP CDeNTIMUCUS SAMPLE BARREL 3 or 3 CENTRAL VELD SANITARY LANDFILL DRILLING GREELEY, COLORADO START f1NISM Northing, 372,272.34 Eastng' 2,192769.98 WATER awl` B0,34. I TIME TIME TIME 1650 1500 1115 DATE •/28/9e 11 I OATE DATE DATUM NOVD ELEVATION 4821.83 CASING DEPTH 13/16/92 3/17/92 DRILL RIG CME-55 SURFACE CONDITIONS Dry/non-vegetation ANGLE 90 eCAR!NC NA SAMPLE HAMMER NA .. Fs TEST RE5ULT3 `44.1— _`< ' , il.`.. 31E -c-,. �1'; Or_1< SO" SA4Pt£ NUMBER AND OESCRiPT10N OF MATERIAL ₹ 3 y C vi V '''Y \< oR as' M uu , 46 .5 4.4 n 2 O -. J YN 3. 3t _ 32 33 r I— CS - - - - _— 34 — 36 —37 - 38 :_:'r (33.0'-38,0') Highly weathered, extrently weak, dark yellowish orange. (IOYR 6/6), silty F. SANDSTONE. laminated, noncolcoreaus, wet, nterfedded with highly weathered extremely weak, naderate dark— - gray. (N4) ELAY^,TONE, soacalcareoML nt. WEATHERED CK BEDR35 _ — ® Cs _— _ —39 -40 - 41 - 42 43 -44 TOTAL DEPTH w 38.0 rt. _ - Z. Vi MI of Ni mi 17'I 931061 SOIL BOREHOLE LOG Slit NAME AND LOCATION WaSTE SERVICES CORPORATION CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL GREELEY, COLORADO Northing, 372.662.59 EaStag, 2.192.768.01 DATUM NGV❑ ELEVATION '027.56 ORIWNC METHOD: 4Z5' ID. 0.25. OD DORPiG NO. NCLLOv STEM AUGER 'G+'$ skEET SA"RUPC uETNOO CONTINUOUS SAMPLE BARREL 1 OF 3 DRIWNG START FPsyl WATER LEVEL24.20' 1 { TIME THE TIME 1700 743 945 OAT! 4/20/92 7 DAYS I DATE G.snc OEPTM I 3/17/92! 3/17/W DRILL RIO CME-55 SURFACE GONDIT S Ory/non-wegatation ANGLE 90 DEARrNG NA SAMPLE HAMMER NA TLS RESULTS {{ go '5� Z. xw q ,yy OV �a `3'g �lV a( M g SAMPLE VUYBER ANO DESCRIPTION OF MMTERML pm rj s 1 A \� F�Jv -5 W M w < }y, l 'rj J N t - - — ,— 1 _ 2 (0.0'-3.0') StiFF, moderate yellowsh brown. (10YR !,'4), unstratiFed. CLAYEY SILT, Stronoly ,. Calcareous, chino, (ML) a a_ - — — -- '— 3 _ - 4 3 — 6 7 (3.0'-8.0') Loose, yellowish brown, UOYR 5/6), unstratlf'ed. f. SAND, little Sgt, trace Cloy. Calcareous, most (SM) 0 cs - ws - — — "'^ 8 — — 9 —iD — 1 1 — 1,2 _— <0.0'-12.3') Loose. yellowish brown, (1OYR 3/6). unstratifle0. F. SAND: tittle Silt. trace Cloy, Calcareous, 0Olst, (SM) <12.5'-13.0') Very loose, brownish yellow. (MOYR 6/6), unstratified. SAND, (SM) (13.0'-13.3') Very loose, brownish yellow. (1OYR 6/6), unstratlfled, SAND, (SM) �� O CS — — — — '� — 0 a 0 — 13 — (13.5'-10,P) Highly weathered. extremely week. dorm yellowish orange, (1DYR 6/6), silty f. SANDSTONE —, _ — — — 'animated, iron oxide stained, noncelcOreous, oan0. pletely weathered extremely — with interbedded, Completely ',Oki nedlun clerk gray. (N4), CLAYSTONE noncaLcareout damp. Plant FOSS11s, WEATHERED BEDROCK _ O CS — — — — CC Z O U J C_ O NI nth o_ 0] O 'Di 71 nj 931061 SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE NAME AND LOCATION DRIWNG METk00: 425" ID. 825. OD BORV C NO, SG -18 HOLLOW STEM AUGER SHEET 2 OF 3 WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION SAMPLING METHOD: CCNTINUCUS SAMPLE BARREL CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL MILK GREELEY, CCLCRA00 START 1 fNISM Northing 372.662.59 2.192.768.01 w" �C' 24.29' TUIE 74'3 TIME ME 9AB mat 1700 I DATE 4/29/92 DATE I DATE 3/17/921 3/17/92 DATUM NGV D ELEVAYION 4827.56 CASJNC DEPTH DRILL RIG CME-53 SURFACE CONOITONS Dry/non xegatation ANGLE 90 BEARINC NA SAMPLE HAMMER NA I DEPTH IN FED (ELEVAIdON) 2 TEST RESULTS .Ids S'„x, u ,$O" r $AMPLE NUMBER AND DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL O 7 a yi v� G 8V C as— oe u„s, ii� C) It E •. in ` bt — — _ 1fi = i7 - , 8 - — - 1 r .r . (18.5'-19.0') COnoietely weathered. extremely weak, McOiLn ay, dark gray, (N4). CLAYSTCNE. nOncalcareous, — — damp. Aanoss t< Fns, vEATI4ERED BEDROCK CS -- — — - 0 0 0 ,. 19 — _ — -^ 20 _ — 21 — 22 (19.T -B2.50. Mighty wwathared. extremely weak, dark yellowsh orange, (10YR 6/6). silty F. SANDSTONE. tanlnated. Iron oxide stained, nOnCalCareous. CAIN). WEATHERED BEDROCK (22.5'-23.0') Completely weathered. extremely weak. new dn dark gray, (NA), CLAYSTCNE. noncatcareous, clomp 010.1t Passim, wCATMERED BEDROCK - 0 CS -a _ - _ —"' _ 0 0 0 _ 23 - - 24 - - 25 _ - 26 -"27 = (23.0'-28.0') Highly weathered, extremity weak, _ moderate dark gray, <NA), CLAYSTCNE. Interlanhated dark trellowish Orange, <IOYR 6/6), silty F. SANDS,CNE, noncalcareos. moist. WEATHERED BECRCCK - Carty neerlan.nated .93% CLAY:;TONE/7% SANDSTONE - -- © CS - - - - - - --. 28 - — 24 _ — - (20.0'-33.0') Highly weathered, extrenely ream. - moderate dark gray, (NA). CLAYSTONC• ;nterlaninated Clark yellowish orange, <10YR 6/6), silty F. SANDSTONE. noncatcare0us, wet. WEATHERED BEDROCK - m finely interlanatea .60% CLAYSTCNC/40'L SANDSTONE '�- O CS - - - _ — z S C cc Ix W C 931061 SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE NAME AND LOCATION WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL GREELEY, COLORADO Northing' 372,662.39 EastMgi 2,392,768.01 DATUM NGVO ELEVATION 4827.36 DRILL RIG CME-55 ANGLE 90 OEAR!NG NA DWLUNC WETN0D: 425" Sp, 8.25' 05 HOLLOV STEM AUGER ISORMG "q. SG -18 SAMPUNC. MEDgD: CONTINUOUS SAMPLE BARREL SHEET 3 pr 3 OPIWNC START 11MC 745 MISR TIME 945 WATER LEVEL TIME DATE CASINO DEPTM 24.28' 1700 •/29/92 OA%E 3/17/92 DArE 3/17/92 SURFACE CONDITIONS pry/nonwegototWn SAMPLE HAMMER NA - I SAMPLE NVMBER AND DESCRIPTION Of MATERIAL z 5.4 A tE 3 — 31 CS --'32 — 33 - 34 — 35 — 36 - 37 38 — 39 — 40 —41 42 - 43 44 (33.01-35.1') Highly weathered, extremely weak, grayish black. (N2), CLAYSTONE with trace f. gray Sandstone. nonCalCareovs (35.1'-36.7') Highly weothered extremely dark yellowish Orange, CIOTR 6/8), silty C. SANDSTONE (S0a and highly weathered. extremely *epic, gr0ylsh black. (N2). CLAYSTONC (36.7'-38.0') Highly wwsthert% extremely now, dark yellowish orange, (10YR 6/6). silty F. SANDSTONE, noncaicareovs TOTAL DEPTH x 38.0 rt. TES RESULTS LIQUID LN7 7{ Al J 0 0 'S W w -d 0 C.) (3 o rl SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE NAME AND LOCATION ORIU/NC MCTMOD: •25' ID, 8.27' CD DOew.G NO, MCLLOV STEP+ AUGER , SG -t9 WASTE SERVICES CCRPCRATICN SAMPLING RENO: CONTINUOUS SAMPLE BARREL I OF 3 CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL DRILLING GREELEY, CCLCRADC STMT RNISM Northing, 373.248.01 Casting' 2.192.772.74 wATtR LEVEL 11.1' j TAE DME TIME 1330 I 1430 1200 OATE j 3/23/9 I I aArE arc OATUM NGVD ELEVATION '835.94 CASIK DEPTH I I 1 3/23/9213/23/92 DRILL RIG cm( -55 I SURFACE* CONoinNs Sl'9ntly muddy/grass ANGLE 90 DEARING NA SAMPLE MANNER NA DEPTH H EEE7 (EL EvmtK1?) Pi TEST RESULTS 4.ur .qYy v} N SAMPLE NUMBER AMo OESCR!P?ION OF wTCRu'. eo i 2 t L } `y$1� 8-u `.:^ .2 w W± sv K o J v -- 2 b _ 1 — 2 (00'-00 ) Stiff, C, tlark yello+sA ', own, (IOYR 3/6), \ unstrat.f,ed, SILTY CLAY. trace F. Sand. strongly \ Calcoreous, roots (0.0'-20'). (CL) I O CS y _ - "- 3 — 4 (1O'-4.2'> St, F. dark yellowish brow.,, (IOYR 3/6). unstrat Pied. SILTY CLAY, trace f. Sand. strongly s CAlcareo, (CO_ \\S\.\(42'-8.0') Stiff. brownish (10YR 6/6). y — — a _ 6 7 yellow, unstratified. SILTY CLAY and 9, SAND, calCarvONS, 4L -SC) N. CALCRETE zone r6' -B' observed in adjacent_cent trench O CS —_„ _,0 — V 0 a 8 —9 _ to — —11 —12 i (&O'-15.0') Loose, brownish yellow, (I3YR G/8). SAND, nonCalCareOus, wet. (SM) 03 CS _ _— — 13 — 14 — O Cs El m C NI 5I C 0' W CC C 0 0 1 W I- 931061 SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE NAME AND LOCAT.ON ORIWNC MEM00: 423' ID. 623' OD I BDRWC NO. NCLLav STEM AUGER SG -l9 SMELT SERVICES CORPORATION yf sAMPUNO lax: C@TINUOUS SANPLE BARREL 2 or 3 CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL GREELEY, COLORADO I , STMT Athol Northing, 173,248.01 Costing 2,192,772.73 WATER ILVCL ILI' i' TIME TIME MC 1330 I 1430 1200 DATE 3/23/99 I ' DATE DATE DATUM NCVD ELEVATION 4833.94 CASINO OEPTn I { 3/23/92 3/23/92 DRILL RIO CME-33 I SURFACE CONDITIONS Sl'gntly muddy/grass ANGLE 90 BEAP:NO NA SAMPLE RAMMER NA C^ TEST RESULTS _� a 4;5,-;.a xalai �� ffi g SAMPLE NUMBER AND DESCRIPTION OF MATERuk Q S C rI •-in �� o a' M W W 3u K 7 - N -- 16 ` - _ 17 18 (17,0•-•18.0') Nighty weathered. extremely week, brownish yellow, (l OYR 6/8). Clean, silty F. SANDSTONE . unstratLFied. nQncolCOrQoMs. wet, homogeneous. WEATHERED ?EDRCCK CS --, - — - -, 0 0 0 19 - 20 .- - _ 21 - - 22 mw .., x.23 (18.0'-2LD9 Mlghly weathered, OOOrly cemented extremely weak, OrOwnish yellow, <IOYR 6/8). Clean. silty F. SANDSTONE, unStratif.ed, noncalCoreOus. wet, homogeneous, WEATHERED BEDROCK (21.0'-22.D'> Highly weathered, poorly Cemented extremely weak, brownish yellow, (10YR 6/8), dean silty P. SANDSTONE, unstrntI6ied nOncelCartous. wet. homogeneous, WEATHERED BEDROCK (22.0'-23.0') Highly weathered. extremely weak. interlanlnoted, dark yellowish orange. (10YR 6/6), - silty F. SANDSTONE. and (wdkes grey. <NS). CLAYSTONE. noneolcareous. wet. Sandstone Iron oxide stained gypsum layers. WEATHERED BEDROCK <23.O'-29.0') Cane Q CS ^^'-- — -- ww _ — 2a _ 25 --26 27 - _ 28 .t as above. except CLAYSTONE beds ore thicker <0."-O.9') = _ (28.0 -29.0') Highly weathered. extremely weak, 1 moderate yellowish brown (1OYR S/4), saey F. - SANDSTONE. weakly Iemioted. noncalcareous. wet, WEATHERED BEDROCK cS — _ — _ - — 0 « 0 o - 29 — nm — ..- (29.0'-33.0') Nlgnly weathered extremely weak. mterlo,*nated dark yellowish orange. (1OYR 6/6). silty F. SANDSTONE, and medium gray, (N5), CLAYSTONE, noncalcareous, wet. Sandstone iron oxide _ stained. gypsum layers. VCATHERE➢ BEDROCK U7 CS - -- -. _. a W u Z 4' i : C N o • 0" 931061 SOIL BOREHOLE LOG sit NAME ANO LOCAnON ORIWNG METH00: 423' ID. 8.25' CD I BORING N.G. HOLLOW STEM AUGER 1 SG -i9 I sHEEr WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION SAMPLING Mi3)100' CONTINUOUS SAMPLE BARREL 3 OF 3 CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL .1 GREELEY, COLORADO START fl isi Nart hln 373,248.01 Cast :ng� t'92.77274 WATER LLtiE4 u.i• I f nu[ TIME MAE 1330 I I 1430 1200 DATE 3/23/92 DATE OArt DATUM NGV➢ ELEVAnON '835.94 CASINO DEPTH j I 3/23/92 3/23/92 DRILL RIG ORE -55 ! SURFACE CONDITIONS Slightly muddy/Grass ANGLE 90 GEARreC NA I SAMPLE HAMMER NA I DEPTH IN FEff ([tEvMiOn) &ow/ Itja ON SAUP[ER ' (RCCOYER7) LUMPUR AND &E TES RESULTS SAMPLE NUMBER AND OE$CRiPT10N V MATERML 6 C e8` g Vl t- ffi3 M WL, 3U R 5 a 8 N g -- 31 —. .---32 33-_- CS — — o o u -. 34 ._ 35 - 36 — 37 -38 �� (33.0'-30.07 Nighty weathered. extremely weak. interlon.nated. dark yellowish orange. (1OYR 6/6). silty 9. SANDSTONE and madams gray, (43), CLAYSTO.Nf, n0ncalcareous. wet. Sandstone Iron oxide stemmed. gypsun layers, WEATHERED BEDROCK _ CS — _ _� — 39 -- 40 ms — 41 C - 42 - 43 —44 TOTAL DEPTH . 38.0 Ft. — AM. — — = — a a 7.1 en 0 E• a • z z 9aioci SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE NAME MO LOCATION DRIU NNC MI.' TMOO: 4.25' ID, 8.25CD ) BORING NO. 4CLLCv STEM AUGER Su -20 SHEET WASTE SERVICES CDRPCRATICN sAMPUNO MEDw0, CONTINUOUS Sv4Pl£ BARREL L or 3 CENTRAL wan SANITARY LANDFILL G j OmLLING GREELEY, CCLDRADC ART j orbsN NOrthwpl 773,239.68 I ATErt Eastmq. 2.192.267.Bt wLLV(1 6.0' I i i TIME TIME nMt: 830 I I 743 943 617E 7/24/9 DATE GATE DATUM NGVD ELENATiON 4827.:6 CASING DORI I I 3/24/92 7/24/92 DRILL RIG CME-53 SURFACE CONDITIONS Dry/non-vegetation ANGLE 90 BEAP'.C NA SAMPLE HAMMER NA �,.., � TEST RESuIT5 { _ ' kw'W .. 8 SAMPLE NUMBER DESCRIPTIONNDOF MATERIAL rc t V gu i v K x t; iV K z. 3 J in �.,,, 1 - Z 3 •.�.� eeei eeee wets (0.'-1.3') SUFf, dark yellowish brown. (10YR 4/4), i:': u'nstrato1,eo. SILTY CLAY, 'race F. Sand, stron;l7 calcareous. most, rOOts. %,.1 J (1,5'-7.5') St.'s, brownish yellow, (Iwo 6/9),- unstratc'. ed. CLAYEY SILT, trace F. Sand, Calcareous, nos', FILL, (ML) o CS -' - - 4 5 J — r 13.5'-6.0') Loose, brownish yellow, con 6/8), unstrat,Fled. CLAYEY SILT, tittle F. Sand. pans of reworked CALCRETE, slightly colCoreous, mast, FILL. <MO (6.0'-7.0) NO recovery (7.0'-7.7') Loose, brownish yellow. (10YR 6/8), unstratiFied. CLAYEY SILT, Bttle F. Sand. Closts or reworked CALCRETE• Slightly Calcareous, POST, TILL, (ML) O CS - -_ 0 0 0 - ' (7J'-3.0') Loose, olive, (5Y 4/4), CLAYEY SILT. little F. Sand, Calcareous, reduced ;Ones. (ML) •_ NR _ --w 8 (8,0'-9.3') Stiff, black. (N2). unstratlFied, F. SAND. Uttle Silt, trace Clay, very Calcareous, (deCay,ng grass and reed -type vegetaton/bockfilled O3 .�. �, - 9 _— 10 — "-•-• 11 — 12 — 13 — — — 14 '._ I Harsh), (SM-OL) . ri (8.3'-10.4') StIFF, block, (Na), unstratiF,ed. F. ' SAND. Little Silt. trace Clay, very Calcareous. i (decaying gran and reed'ty0e vegetat100/backAlled marsh), (SM-CL) ' <10.4'-10.9'7 LOOse. Olive. C3Y 4/4), CLAYEY SILT. little F, Sand, Calcareous. "educed Zones, (ML) 1 (10.9'-13,5') Arty weathered, extremely weak, — ,nterlonmated. dar4 yellowish orange. (LOYR 6/6), silty F. SANDSTONE, iron oxide staiMng, and mediae gray. (N3). CLAYSTCNC, nonColcareoue, moist, - 'EATHERED BEDROCK - (13,5'-14,3') Mighty weathered, •xtrenely weak, interl0Nnated. dark yellowish Orange. (IOYR 6/6), SAty F, SANDSTONE. iron oxide staiNng, and medium — gray. <N5). CLAYSTONE. nOnCalCare0us, moist, . vEATHERLD BEDROCK 114.5'-t8.5') Moderately weathered, very weak, CC ... - - —, — -, - — _ — 0 0 I — .4DOarly — moderate yellowish brown, <1OYR 3/4), silty F. SANDSTONE. unstrotfied, mace iron owkfe stomag,q cemented, nOncalcareous. moist, WEATHERED - 3EDROCK S — 0 0 0 cc M C v U z J l~ C C w 0 V NI in 931061 SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE NAME AND LOCATION DRILUNC 'Arco: 427 ID. 82t OD DOPING NO. HOLLOW STEM AUGER I SG -20 SHEET WASTE SERVICES CCRPCRATICN SAMRUNG METHOD: CONTINUOUS SAMPLE BARREL i 2 OF 3 CENTRAL VELD SANITARY LANDFILL ORIWNC GREELEY, CCLORACG STMT FINISH Northing, 373,239.66 Casting, 2,192,267.81 WATER LEVEL 6.0' I Dm( TIME TIMEB30 I 745 945 DATE 3/24/93 DATE 1 DATE DATUM NGVD ELEVATION '827.16 CASING DEPTH 1 3/28/92 3/24/92 DRILL RIC CME—S5 SURFACE CONDRIONS Cry/non-vegetavon ANGLE 90 BEARING NA I SAMPLE HAMMER NA ffi TE5Y RESULTS Wr+ _3, 2� 0V cc— ;vlu ss lj SAMPLµoUMBER DESCRIPTION OF IACTRML4,4 GZ i 0: �, ,a� �1 Y�Y et K y„i, 3 H 2 a J N —. _ -17 GS -- - 18 — 19 - -- 20 C — 21 — 22 ^-e-_� .. -� _ — _ `1 (18.5'-23.5') Highly reothered, extremely weok, Interlom.nated. dark yellows" orange, (UOVR 6/6), Vey F. SANDSTONE. iron oxide staining no netliun gray, (N5). CLAYSTONE. nonCalcareous. nowt, WEATHERED BEDROCK (23.5'-25.5') Highly weathered, extremely week, O CS ,--..- — — — — 0 0 0 — 23 _ - 24 � — 25 w 26 — 27 � a - =_ •nterlaninotea dark yel(owish orange, (IOYR 6/6), s8ty F. SANDSTONE: iron Oxide seaming, and neck" gray, (,N3), CLAYSTONE, noncolcarfous, meltt. WEATHERED BEDROCK (25.3'-26.0') Highly notherea extremely weak, interlom,natea dark yellowish Orange, QOYR 6/6), silty F. SANDSTONE, iron woo* staining ono medium groY, (NS). CLAYSTONC, nancaLcareOks. nowt, VCATHERCD BEDROCK (26.0'-29") No recovery CS ___, -- - - - — 0 0 0 _— 28 O — 29 _-- .:::� -. -.r- (28.7'-29.5') Highly weathered, extremely weak, grsyisn olack, (NZ), CLAYSTCNC. noncalcareous• fissile, WEATHERED BEDROCK CS - _ nix - (29.5'-33,09 No recovery NR z. W, H• I al " I C 931061 SOIL BOREHOLE LOG Silt NAME AND LOCATION ORIWNG NEthOD: 425' ID. 825' 0➢ BORING NO. SG -20 HOLLOW STEM AUGER SHEET 3 of 3 WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION SNIPUNG METHOD: cONTINucus SAMPLE BARREL CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL DfiruaMc GREELEY, COLORADO START / INSH Northing' 373.239.68 Costing' 2.192267.81 WATER IfVEL 6.0' I TIME 745 I !WE I 945 TIME 830 I DATE 3/24/97, I t DATE DATE 3/24/92 DATUM NOVO ELEVAnoN 4827.16 CASING 004TH II I7/24/92 DRILL RIG CME-55 SURFACE CONCI IONS OrY/non-veget0 ton ANGLE 90 BEARING NA SAMPLE HAMMER NA e&ows/roof ON CASING TES RESULTS u' ;u 1LC W41.7 *NA.: Cn SAMPLE NUMBER AND DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL z a Y M rcW =a 3V we J N - 31 — —3Z —33 NR .— — — -_ — 34 - 35 - 36 — 37 38 — 39 40 - 41 - 42 - 43 — 44 ^ . TOTAL DEPTH • 33A Ft. _ - — I -s C 0 of NI NI W 931061 SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE NAME AND LOCADON DRILLING MET1400: 4.2D' ID. 8.23' OD 80RiNC NO. HOLLOV STEM ALDER 'G-2: I SHEET WASTE SERVICES CCRPORATICN SAMPLING METM00: CONTINUOUS SAMPLE BARREL or 3 CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL [ DRIIJ,ING GREELEY, CCLDRADO START lwSM Northing' 373,233.37 Easing, 2.191.323.07 WAtta ILK.. I I8' ' TIME TIME PARE L 1430 1213 1430 DATE 3/24/9.7 ! O*TE OME OANM NGVD ELEVATION 4829.81 CASING OEPM i i 3/2•/92 3/24/92 DRILL RIG CME-35 SURFACE CONDRIONS DrY/non vegetated ANGLE 90 BEARING NA SIMPLE HAMMER NA TEST RESULTS G,-. _LT I ., §---''' dam raj"' \ ov 8u J g SAMPLE NUMBER mo NO DESCRIPTION or 1MTERML i3 �{ 2 3 l I- 10 8,1 V al M z ",� iJ IrV M c 'A N g — <0.0'-0.8') Stiff. dark ye110wish brawn, (LOYR 4/4), r unstrat:F,ed. SILTY CLAY, very LQ,careous, r0ot.. — -- 1 — _ 2 0ct.ct. (CL) <O.B'-3.C') Stiff. yolk:near brown, (1OYR 3/4), unstratited. CLAYEY SILT and F. SAND, Calcareous. tl /. (ML) 0 CS — - _ 3 - - d - 5 - - 6 — 7 <3.0'-8.0') Loon. O/Ownish yellow. (10YR 6/6). unstrat;FIed. SILT, trace F. :and. calcareous, dry. <ML> CS - — - — - - 0 0 0 8 - 9 — t0 - — — 11 — —12 - <8A' -1o.7') Loose, brownish yellow, <10TR 6/6). unstrutif,ed. SILT, trace F, Son.. Calcareous, dry, <ML) (ID7'-13.0') STIFF, brownish yellow, (10YR 6/8). unStra9Fied. CLAYEY SILT, very calcareous. moist, OIL)— <13.0'-189') OrOwnish <ICYR 6/91. C: - __. - - - — J — 0 o 0 —13 — -14 — STIFF', yellow, unStratiFied. CLAYEY SILT, very calcareous,'nt, 0.s <ML> -- CS - - — — In tX W Ii C z C U U z C' CI yy2 1' NI a1 2 C C J- C - 921061 SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE NAME AND LOCATION WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL GREELEY, COLORADO Northing' 373.233.37 Eas tingl 2.191.525.07 DATUM NCVD ELEVATION 482981 DRILLING 1411400, 4.23' ID. 825' OD BORING No. 1. MCLLCV STEM AUGER SG -DI SHEET SAL'PUNO14ETl'oo: CCNTtMUOUS SAMPLE BARREL 2 of 3 DIBwNc STMT CWSM WATER LIVID. 19' I I I nue nue TIME 1430 I 1215 1430 DATE 3/24/92 6YTE OAie CASING COIN I 3/24/92 3/2A/92 DRILL RIG CME-55 SORYACE CONDrnoNS Dry/non vegetated ANGLE 90 BEARING NA SAMPLE HAMMER NA BLOW/ Litt ON SAA<Pt ER (RECOVERY) TS TEST RESULTS r'W'i -5 Z ITs r 4W �V +t ffiN SAMPLE NUMBER DESCRIPTION OF MATERuIcs O 7 Y I- V gY \,2 ? M u #u M 0 ? -. N + 3 - I6 - 17 CS _ = - —]8 _ — _ _ 19 — 20 - — 21 — — 22 (18.0'-21.00 Stiff. browAISh yellow, (IDYR 6/s>, UnStraLFled, CLAYEY SILT, nonccicareous. wet. ()IL) (21.0'-21,2•) Coarse SAND, <SP) (21.2'-23.0'> STIFF. brownish yellow, (10YR 6/8), unstratIFed. CLAYEY SILT, very calcareous, moist, (MO Qs CS — — - — — C o a _— 23 wv — — 24 25 — 26 — 27 <23,0'-28.0') STIFF, brownish yellow, (IDYR 6/B), unstratIFled, CLAYEY SILT, little 9. Sand. wry calcareovs, hoist, (ML) © _ — a o a — 28 _ ,—WC — 29 — — — ::: (28.0'-29.30 Stiff. brown.sn yellow, (1CYR 6/8), unstratIFled, CLAYEY SILT, little F. Sand. very OPCOUS. MOIST. (ML) C29.3' -33A') Highly to Conpletely weathered, extremity weak, orowNSh yellow, (1OYR 5/4), salty C. SANDSTONE, nontalCareous. wet WEATHERED BEDROCK O CS — _ — — — 0 0 0 3- CS 1-1 (U� O nl nil NI Al PI 0 L m O '4 Ct at WI n C 0' • u.I C z 931061 SOIL BOREHOLE LOG SITE ,MANE ANC LOCATION WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL GREELEY, COLORADO Northing. 373.233 ' CPS tag. Z49025.O7 DATUM NGVD EIXYAnON 4829.81 DRILLING METHOD: 4.23' IA 823' OD eoRING mo. NCLLDW Slim AUGER SG -2:. I SHEET SAMRUAIC METHOD. ECNTTNWUS Smote BARREL I 3 or 3 omLuHc sTART ' �� WATER LEVE3. 18, n M Timc TIME 1430 1213 1430 GATE 3/241% I CATE CAME CASINO DEPTH 3/241 2, 3/24/92 DRILL RIG CNE-33 suRrAOe DONDmoNS Dry/non vegetateo ANGLE 90 SEARING NA SAMPLE HAMMER NA - TEST RESULTS ^ 13 AjW¢ W- o u 8 g SAMPLE AND NUMBER DESCRIPTION or MATERIAL o ,₹ W Ji k i !;.2K \� v., M wit a` so o -, -, v. 7 -- 31 - — 32 33 CS — - - _— -- 34 — 35 — 36 — 37 --- 38 — 39 — 40 - 41 --42 - 43 — 44 TOTAL DEPTH • 33.0 Ft. — _ — - - - — - - NI s w WI In II S1 J v VI NI T, a 901061 LANDFILL SOIL GAS PROBE CONSTRUCTION SUMMARIES T , *r? tx � n'�-t,l4 G?��W�r ��' F'�`�%1�'�"*�� e "�'+hYrvrwfi n`[:'i 'S'�4.rli'.]��'��'-tfl. Iii MAJOR DIVISIONS GRAPHIC SYMBOL GROUP SYMBOL TYPICAL DESCRIPTIONS GRAVEL AND CLEAN yeL GRAVELS .h.. • '.. - i or:� :•'.r ..:. ri `., G NY wcll-GRA0t0 CRAMS. WYIL-SANG None utM OR NO RNIS COARSE GRAVELLY SOILS �) • - • G P rOORLT X1IAOIO GRAMS. CRAWL - IMO wSnKi uTilL OR No TNa GRAINED SDILS NONE mbar 504 0/ SELWIED DIE NO. A SKYE GRAVEL YAM FINES(Wilei • r I •• + �'•� `'y1t t'� �' . "• j I GM an GRAMS. CRAWL-SANMmi Nano= I NQ) yy��R.1L -. F..\ \�^' )> G C C4m GAYILT. OMVKL-T.000-W. walvotS ROC MAN 00I SANG AND SANOY CLEAN SAND ... S W w(-GLLRAOO SANDS. GRAYCLY Wet UT U OR No nIN3 OrWNG�ad INAN R"d IS N0. 200 LLYC SRC SOILS ILLS TRAR 5x Finn) S S P G4000 O11 GAMUT SANos, LxOS URIl OR MG 111(5 LES]INAM SOY. Or Count TRACTION xtv[ SANDS w r FINES TTT• Iil ;i 1) 1 1 p : I : '7. '� ,I SM an S...OS, SANG- LT sornarra COST( TNAN Ij$ FINIS) 4� �.\ \\\�\�`- \I SC CURT SAnOS. SAxO-cur NISTVRIS I I I , M M NORGA INIC SNANLN n O PERT ANL D inn( S. GR non. SLIT OR CUM MC SAMOS OR GLUEY SUS NON SLIGHT TULSTICT N riNEINORGANIC GRAINED SILTS AND uaV10 u.1 Ica TIIAR SOL \\�'\ \\\� ` C L CLAYS OT LOw TO " Num ru5TCTT. G4YE4Y pdS SWOT CLAYS vLTT Can. LIM Mn CLAYS OL 1 0440.044C SILT' NN: artAN0 ORCACLAYS or LOW RUSTIcm NORC TNAN 50% 1I' INORGANIC VtTL ARCLCCOVS OR Ouraw4taIJVS INK sa0 OR SiLN WAS or NATURIA u IMASTNAN LQS. NO. COO SIN[ IRE SIL15 UaD TWIT AND "yRe THAN 50] rI /J/ I C H H WORtwC CLAYS 04 MGM PLATON!. TAT GUNS CLAYS O H onn..C CLAYS of NIO.V" TO NCI' NLASTCR . OROAwC SILTS MIGNLY ORGANIC SOILS NaT... Sw5r Sas NNW NN." N _ PT M ORGASM COMMITS NOR. OVAL !Tau MC OSLO TO MOOR 004‘444444 sat C\A[s•icAnO s. ROCK rots 't SANOSTO" l D Denver, Colorado SOIL AND ROCK CLASSIFICATION CHART C4JENT/PROJECT WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL OM 14 DPk SATE JI INE 1992 'J09 NO. 923-2403 2NEFid.3 JAC SCNF NOT TO SCALEIAwG "DL/REV' "DOJCLa5DwC 2N _L_ Raew© "A/2"A/2.i ET NO. IFlCURE NO. R-;a � Probe No. SG -1 LANDFILL GAS Boring No. X -Ref: • 0 r II • r20 MONITORING PROBE CONSTRUCTION SUMMARY Survey Coords: Northing: 372744.47 rt. Elevation Ground Level 4815.40 it. NGVD Easting: 2191475.35 It Top of PVC Casing 4816,73 ft. NGVD Drilling Summary: Total Depth 29.0 ft. Borehole Diameter 7.25 in. Casing Stickup Height 1.33 ft. Driller Drilling Engineers Rick Rogers Rig CME-55 Bit(s) Hollow Stem Auger Drilling Fluid none Protective Casing 5' anodized aluminum Probe Design & Specifications Basis: Geologic Log X Geophysical Log Casing string(s): C - Casing S - Screen Depth String(s) Elevation .1.33 - 6.0 C1 6.0 - 26.0 Si 4816.73 - 4809.40 4809.40 - 4789.40 Casing: C1 r diameter Sch.40 PVC flush threaded w/ 0 -rings Screen: Si 1" Sch. 40 PVC flush treaded w/o -rings 30 0.01-b" Machine Slot 35 Filter Pack: 1/4• Pea gravel (29.0'-4.0') 16/40 Filter Sand (4.0'-3.0') Surface Seal: Concrete (2.0'-0.0) Bentonite Seal: Bentonite chips (3.0'-2.0') Construction Time log: Start Task Date Time D/llling auger GeOphys,Logging Casing: Filter Placement: Cementing: 3111168 WA 1/12/22 3112/64 3/17/02 1600 WA 0700 0770 07.4 Finish Date Time 3nnnn N/A 3/12114 3/12/92 1112192 WA 071s Avg 074 0830 Comments Not to Scale Comments: Supervised by JOb Number J. Cremeene 913.2402 Site Central Weld Sanitary landfill rile Name 2403SG1 931461 Probe No. SG -2 LANDFILL GAS Boring No. X-Ret: MONITORING PROBE CONSTRUCTION SUMMARY Survey Coords: Northing: 372240.29 n. Elevation Ground Level 4793.87 h. NGVO Easting: 2191470.41 It. Top of PVC Casing 4794.90 It. NGVD -10 15 - 1 F-20 -25 ':J =l 30 35 40 Drilling Summary: Total Depth 29.0 It Borehole Diameter 7.25 in. Casino Stickup Height 1,03 n. Driller Drilling Engineers Rick Rogers Rig CME-55 Bit(s) Hollow Stem Auger Grilling Fluid none Protective Casing 5 anodized aluminum 'Basis: Geologic Log X Geophysical Log Casing string(s): C • Casing S — Screen Depth Strin• s) Elevation Not to Scale Probe Design & Specifications 1.03 - 6.0 6.0 - 26.0 4794.90 - 4787.87 4787.87 -. 4707.87 Casing: C1 1. diameter Sch,40 PVC flush threaded w/ 0 -rings Screen: Si 1' Sch. 40 PVC flush threaded w/ 0 -rings 0.010' Flacnwe Slat Filter Pack: 1/4" Pea gravel (29.0'-4.0') 16/40 Filter Sand (4.0'-3.0') Surface Seal: Concrete (2.0'-0.0') Bentonite Seat: Bentonite chips (3.0'-2.0') Construction Time log: Stan Finish Task Date Time Date Drilling euQW Ge0phys.Lo00ing Casing: Filter Placement: Cementing: 3!1252 DNa WA WA 311292 1130 .'111ve2 311 yet 1144 '200 3/e2tii2 N/A 3112192 3/17/92 3/13/v2 Time 1000 WA 11A' 1200 12]0 Comments Comments: SupeMaed by Job Number J. Cremeena 913-2403 Site Central Weld Sanitary (andnll File Name 2403562 931061 -10 F15 h-20 • • 25 30 35 -40 Probe No. SG -3 LANDFILL GAS Boring No. X -Ref: MONITORING PROBE CONSTRUCTION SUMMARY Survey Coords: Northing: 371750.47 rt. Elevation Ground Level 4770.87 ft. NGVD Easting: 2191471.80 R Too of PVC Casing 4773.33 ft. NGVD Drilling Summary: Total Depth 16.0 ft. Borehole Diameter 7.25 in. Casing Stickup Height 2.46 tt. Driller Drilling Engineers Rick Rogers Rag CME-55 Blt(s) Hollow Stern Auger 1 Drilling Fluid none ti a Protective Casing 5' anodized aluminum Probe Design & Specifications _basis: Geologic Log X Geophysical Log Casing string(s): Cs Casing S - Screen Depth I String(s) J Elevation 2.46 - 6.0 6.0 - 14.0 C1 14773.33 - 4704.87 S1 ! 4744.87 - 4750.87 Casing: Cl 1" diameter Sch.40 PVC flush threaded w/ 0 -rings Screen: S1 1- Son. 40 PVC flush threaded w/ o -rings 0.010' Machine Slot Filter Pack: 1/4° Pea gravel (16.0'-4.0') 16/40 Filter Sand (4.0'-3.0') Surface Seal: Concrete (2.0'-0.0') Bentonite Seal: Bentonite chips (3.0'-2.0') Construction lime log: Stan Task Date Time Drilling auger Geopnys.Logging Casing: Filter Placement: Cementing: 3/12/92 WA 1112192 1/12812 112212 'a WA 1l30 1000 1830 Finish Date Time 3112/12 WA 3112/02 112/92 Y12/02 1530 WA 11846 1ex 7715 Comments Not to Scale Comments: supervised by J. Camara Ito Central Weld Sanitary landfill Job Number 913-2403 !Rie Name 24035G3 931061 Probe No, SG -4 • • �20 -25 i-30 LANDFILL GAS Boring No. X -Ref: MONITORING PROBE CONSTRUCTION SUMMARY Survey Coords: Northing: a71a91.53R Elevation Ground Level 4766.15 ft. NGVO Easting: 219177336 it. Top of PVC Casing 4767.55 ft. NGVO Drilling Summary: Total Depth 16.0 ft. Borehole Diameter 7.25 in. Casing Stickup Height 1.40 ft. Driller Drilling Engineers Rick Rogers Rig CME-55 81t(s) Hollow Stem Auger Drilling Fluid none Protective Casing 5 anodized aluminum Probe Design & Specifications Basis: Geologic Log X Geophysical Log Casing string(s): C - Casing S - Screen Depth . 1.40 - 6.0 6.0 - 14.0 String(s) Elevation C1 S1 476755 - 4760.1S 4760.15 - 4752.15 Alg Casing: C1 1 • diameter Sch.40 PVC flush threaded w/ o -rings Screen: Si 1" Scn. 40 PVC flush threaded *1 o -rings 0.010" Machine Slot Filter Pack: 1/4• Pea gravel (16.0'-4.0') 16/40 Filter Sand (4.0'-3.0') Surface Seat: Concrete (2.0'-0.0') Bentonite Seal: Bentonite cities (3.0'-2.0') Construction Time log: Start Task Date Time Drilling auger Geophys.Logging Casing: Filter Placement: Cementing: 3113/97 WA 3/1102 11NPi W13/92 0715 0000 0916 0930 Finish Date Time 0/13/09 WA 3/12102 113192 111112 01100 WA 0916 0600 1000 Comments Comments: Supervised by Job Numb., J. Cr11meen* 913-2403 Site Central Weld Sanitary Landfill Pie Name 2403SG4 931061 • Probe No. se -s LANDFILL GAS Boring No. X -Ref: MONITORING PROBE CONSTRUCTION SUMMARY Survey Coords: Northing: 371013.35 rt. Elevation Ground Level 4759.73 n. NGVO Fasting: 219212t05 rt. Top of PVC Casing 4761.72 It. NGVD Drilling Summary: Total Depth 10.0 ft. Borenole Diameter 7.25 in. Casing Stickup Height 1.99 ft. Driller Drilling Engineers Rick Rogers i Rig CME-55 ,0 r'20 -25 Not to Scale Bit(s) Hollow Stem Auger Drilling Fluid none Protective Casing 5' anodized aluminum Probe Design & Specifications Basis: Geologic Log x Geophysical Log Casing string(s): C - Casing S . Screen Depth Strings) Elevation .1.99 - 2.0 C1 2.0 - 8.0 S1 4751.72 - 4757.73 4757,73 - 4751.73 Casing: C1 1' diameter Sch.40 PVC flush threaded w/ o -rings Screen: S1 1" SCh. 40 PVC flush threaded w/ 0 -rings 0.010" Machine Slot Filter Pack: 1/4" Pea gravel (10.0'-2.0) Surface Seal: Concrete (1.5'-0.0') Bentonite Seal: Bentonite chips (2.0'-1.5') Construction Time log: Start Task Date Time Drilling sup« Geophys.Logging Casing: Filter Placement: Cementing: 311NC WA 3113192 3113192 3113/92 1230 WA 1300 1316 1m Finish Date Time wives WA 3/13102 3113192 '/13/92 1300 N/A 1315 1330 1 A00 Comments Comments: Supervised by Job Number J. Crimsons 013-2403 Sit. Central Weld Sanitary Landfill File Name 2403SG5 931061 ' Probe No. SG -8 LANDFILL GAS Boring No. X -Ref: MONITORING PROBE CONSTRUCTION SUMMARY • 0 -5 -10 15 X20 • -25 30 35 40 • Survey Coords: Northing: 37066626 R Elevation Ground level 4755.09 ft. NGVD fasting: 2102423.07 6. Top of PVC Casing 4756.37 tr. NGVD Drilling Summary: Total Depth 19.0 tt. Borehole Diameter 7.25 in. Casing Stickup Height Driller Drilling Engineers 1.28 ft. Rick Rogers Rig CME-55 Bits) Hollow Stem Auger Drilling Fluid none Protective Casing 5' anodized aluminum Probe Design & Specifications Basis: Geologic Log X Geophysical Log Casing string(s): C - Casing S - Screen Depth String(s)` Elevation • 1.28 - 6.0 C1 6.0 - 17.0 S1 4756.37 - 4710.09 4740.00 - 4733,00 Casing: C1 1" diameter Sch.40 PVC flush threaded wl o -rings Screen: S1 1' Sch. 40 PVC flush threaded wl o -rings 0.0100 Machine Skit Filter Pack: 1/4- Pea gravel (21.0'-4.0') 16/40 Filter Sand (4.0"-3.01 Surface Seal: Concrete (2.0'-0.0) Bentonite Seal: Bentonite chips (3.0'-2.0') Construction Time log: Stan Task Date Time Drilling eu0er Geophys.Logging Casing: Filter Placement: Cementing: 311St2 WA 311»2 313192 3111142 1446 WA 1444 1444 1430 Finish Date Time 3113192 sW WA 3113/112 3113192 3113192 WA 1500 4p 100 Comments Not to Scale Comments: Supervised by Job Number .1, Caimans 913-2403 File Name 2403S66 Site C.ntgl Weld Sanitary land6C 931%1 Probe No. SG -7 j -10. -20t • • F30 • i-40 50 60 70 80 LANDFILL GAS Boring No. X -Ref: MONITORING PROSE CONSTRUCTION SUMMARY Survey Coords: Northing: 37444044 n. Elevation Ground Level 4780.25 ft. NGVO Easti n g: 2192916.57 d. Top of PVC Casing 4782.00 It. NGVD Drilling Summary: Total Depth 48.0 tt. Borehole Diameter 7.25 in. Casing Stickup Height 1.75 ft. Driller Drilling Engineers Rick Rogers Rig CME-55 Bit(s) Hollow Stem Auger Drilling Fluid none Protective Casing 5' anodized aluminum J b Probe Design & Specifications Basis: Geologic Log X Geophysical Log Casing string(s): C - Casing S - Screen Depth I String(s) Elevation . 1.75 - 6.0 j C1 4782.00 • 4774.25 6.0 - 36.0 ! Si 4774.25 - 4744.25 Casing: C1 1- diameter Sch.40 PVC flush threaded w/ 0 -rings Screen; Si 1" Scn. 40 PVC flush threaded wl o -rings 0.010" Machine Slot Filter Pack: 1/4" Pea gravel (48.0'-4.0') 16/40 Filter Sand (4.0'-3.0') Surface Seal: Concrete (2.0'-0.0) Bentonite Seal: Bentonite chips (3.0'-2.0') Construction Time log: Start Task Date Time Drilling AWN Geophys.Logging Casing: 11eN2 MIA 2nere2 Filter Placement: Inane Cementing: Mega Jibe w� 1110 41.18 t415 Finish Date Time 9'/0/92 ¶130 wW_ lam 511e/t2 bite/02 wA 1146 • fats 1509 Comments Not to Scale Comments: Supervised by J. Cremeene St. Central Weld Sanitary Landfill Job Number 913-2403 File Nam. 2403502 931061 Probe No. so -e LANDFILL GAS Boring No. X -Ref: MONITORING PROBE CONSTRUCTION SUMMARY 10 15 -2 30 35 40 Survey Coords: Northing: Easting: 37007210 e. Elevation Ground Level 4791.90 ft. NGVD 2193414,15 n. Top of PVC Casing 4793.12 h. NGVD Drilling Summary: Total Depth 34.0 ft. Borehole Diameter 8.25 in. Casing Stickup Height Driller Drilling Engineers 1.22 h. Rick Rogers Rig CME-55 Bit(s) Hollow Stem Auger Drilling Fluid none Protective Casing 5' anodized aluminum Probe Design & Specifications .Basis: Geologic Log X Geophysical Log — Casing string(s): C - Casing S - Screen .4 Depth String(s) Elevation . 1.22 - 6.0 6.0 - 32.0 CI S1 4793.12 - 4735.90 4785,90 - 4759.90 Casing: C1 1" diameter Sch,40 PVC flush threaded w/ o -rings Screen: Si 1' Sch. 40 PVC flush threaded w/ o -rings 0.010" Machine Slot Filter Pack: 1/4" Pea gravel (34.0'-4.0') 16/40 Filter Sand (4.0'-3.0') Surface Seal: Concrete (2.0'-0.0') Bentonite Seal: Bentonite chips (3.0'-2.0') Construction Time log: Stan Task Date Time Drilling Silo- Geophys,Logging Casing: Filter Placement: Cementing: ar2192 1000 N/A N/A 12210'2 1130 vrv92 3/23/172 1140 1216 Finish Date Time !/13/62 NIA 1'23/92 12]92 1136 N/A 1140 1215 1710 Comments Not to Scole Comments: Supervised by Job Number J. Cremeens 913-2403 Site Central Weld Sanitary Landfill File Name 2403568 931061 ' -35 -40 Probe No. SG -9 LANDFILL GAS Boring No. X -Ref: MONITORING PROBE CONSTRUCTION SUMMARY Survey Coords: Northing: 170888.01 8. Elevation Ground Level 4759.27 ft. NGVD Casting: 2193587.48 It Top of PVC Casing 4760.55 ft. NGVD Drilling Summary: Total Depth 33.0 it. Borehole Diameter 8.25 in. Casing Stickup Height Driller Drilling Engineers Rick Rogers 1.28 ft. Rig CM£ -55 Bit(s) Hollow Stem Auger Drilling Fluid none Protective Casing 5' anodized aluminum Probe Design & Specifications Basis: Geologic Log X Geophysical Log Casing string(s): C . Casing S - Screen Depth Strings) Elevation . 1.28 - 6.0 Cl 4780.55 - 4753.27 4753.27 - 4728.27 6.0 - 31.0 SI Casing: Cl 1e diameter Sch.40 PVC flush threaded w! o -rings Screen; 51 1• Sch. 40 PVC flush threaded w/ o -rings 0.010' Machine Slot Filter Pack 1/4• Pea gravel (33.0'.4.0') 16/40 Filter Sand (4.0'-3.0') Surface Seal: Concrete (2.0'-0.0') Bentonite Seal: Bentonite chips (3.0'-2.0') Construction Time log: Stan Task Date Time Drilling super Geophys.Logging Casing: Fitter Placement: Cementing: 146 Mu WA 325122 312t2 1060 N/A 1700 12,8 ,746 Finish Date Time utsts2 WA 12Lv2 5125/92 '146 WA 1x15 ,240 1300 Comments Not to Scale Comments: Supervised by Job Number J. Cremeene 913-2403 Site Central Weld Sanitary Landfill File Nam@ 24035G9 921061 Probe No. so -10 I -10 2 �30 »40 50 60 70 -80 LANDFILL GAS Boring No. X -Ref: MONITORING PROBE CONSTRUCTION SUMMARY Survey Coords: Northing: 371123.38 it. Elevation Ground Level 479220 ft. NGVD Easting: 2193397.75 8. TOO of PVC Casing 4793.36 It. NGVD - 4 H Drilling Summary: Total Depth 48.0 ft. Borehole Diameter 8.25 in. Casing Stickup Height Driller Drilling Engineers 1.16 ft. Rick Rogers Rig CME-55 Bit(s) Hollow Stem Auger Drilling Fluid none Protective Casing 5' anodized aluminum .7 Probe Design & Specifications .Basis: Geologic Log X Geophysical Log — Casing string(s): C - Casing S - Screen Depth String(s) Elevation Construction Time log: Start Task Date Time Drilling Auger Geophys.Logging Casing: Filter Placement: Cementing: WA Snare: 3f21/92 3/28122 1616 WA IMO 1730 Finish Date Time ]1'•1112 WA 3/2e19z 3#28192 3/21/92 1830 WA IMO 030 .1.16 - 6.0 I C1 6.0 - 46.0 S1 4793.30 473&20 - 4746.20 - 4786.20 Casing: CI 1" diameter Sch.40 PVC flush threaded w/ o -rings Screen: S1 1' Sch. 40 PVC flush threaded wl 0 -rings 0.010' Macnine Slot Filter Pack: 1/4" Pea gravel (48.0'-4.0') 16/40 Filter Sand (4.0'-3.0') Surface Seal; Concrete (2.0'-0.0') Bentonite Seal: Bentonite chips (3.0'-2.0') Comments Not to Scole Comments: Supervised by Job Number J. Crimean, 913-2403 Site Central Weld Sanitary Landfill File NATO 2403SG10 831061 Probe No. SG -12 •-0 • -20 -25 -30 -40 Hi -35 LANDFILL GAS Boring No. X-Ret: MONITORING PROBE CONSTRUCTION SUMMARY Survey Coords: Northing: 371952.67 n. Elevation Ground Level 4796.98 ft. NGVO Fasting: 2194040.82 R. Top of PVC Casing 4798.43 R. NGVD Drilling Summary: Total Depth 33.0 ft. Borehole Diameter 8.25 in. Casing Stickup Height 1.45 ft. Driller Drilling Engineers Rick Rogers Rig CME-55 Bit(s) Hollow Stem Auger Drilling Fluid none Protective Casing 5' anodized aluminum Probe Design & Specifications - Basis: Geologic Log X Geophysical Log 1 Casing string(s): C - Casing S . Screen —11J Depth String(s) Elevation 1.45 - 6.0 C1 -�� 6.0 - 31.0 S1 4798,43 - 4790.98 4790.98 - 4765,98 Casing: Cl 1' diameter Sch.40 PVC flush threaded w/ O -rings Screen: Si 1 • Sch. 40 PVC flush threaded w/ 0 -rings 0.010" Machine Slot Filter Pack: 1/4• Pea gravel (33.0'-4.0) 16/40 Filter Sand (4.0'-3.0') Surface Seal: Concrete (2.0'-0.0') Bentonite Seal: Bentonite chips (3.0'-2.0') Construction Time log: Start Task Date lime Drilling auger Geophys. Logging Casing: Filter Placement: Cementing: WA arJLs2 31'2L92 1175192 Finish Date Time 1266 v211R 1616 WA WA WA 'ale 3/25192 +360 1830 1645 wylppi 3t2L92 3t251e2 11146 1900 Comments Not to Scale Comments: Supervised by Job Number J. Cremeens 913-2403 Site Central Wald Sanitary Landfill File Name 24035012 9J1.064 40 Probe No. SG -13 LANDFILL GAS Boring No. X -Ref: MONITORING PROBE CONSTRUCTION SUMMARY Survey Coords: Northing: 3719454e ft. Elevation Ground Levet 4805.63 St. NGVD Easing: 2103544.40 6. Top of PVC Casing 4806.59 ft. NGVD Drilling Summary: Total Depth 33.0 ft. Borehole Diameter 8.25 in. Casing Stickup Height 0.96 tt. Driller Drilling Engineers Rick Rogers Rig CME-55 Bit(s) Hollow Stem Auger Drilling Fluid none Protective Casing 5' anodized aluminum Probe Design & Specifications IBasis: Geologic Log X Geophysical Log LT Casing string(s): C - Casing S - Screen Depth String(s) Elevation • 0.96 - 6.0 6.0 - 31.0 C1 S1 4606.50 - 4799.63 4799.63 - 4774.63 • Casing: Cl I diameter Sch.40 PVC flush threaded w/ o -rings Screen: Si r Sch. 40 PVC (lush threaded w/ o -rings 0.010` Machine Slot Filter Pack:1/4- Pea gravel (33.0'-4.0') 16/40 Filter Sand (4E-3.0') Surface Seal: Concrete (2.0'-0.0') Bentonite Seal: Bentonite chips (3.0'-2.0') Construction Time log: Stan Task Date Time Drilling auger Geopnys.Logging Casing: Filter Placement: Cementing: 3/20/02 WA 3nmr2 3/26/92 3,26492 eels WA 1044 1100 1130 Finish Date lime 3nO/V2 WA 3,26422 3/26422 3/26192 1eee N/A flop 1130 1143 Comments Not to Scale Comments: Supervised by J. Cremeene Site Central Wetd Sanitary Landfill Job Number 913-2403 File Name 24035G13 931061 Not to Scale Probe No. SG -14 LANDFILL GAS Boring No. X -Ref: MONITORING PROBE CONSTRUCTION SUMMARY Survey Coords: Northing: 371501.760. Elevation Ground Level 4803.04 rt. NGVD Easting: 2193010.9- R Top of PVC Casing 4804.06 ft. NGvO Drilling Summary: Total Depth 38.0 ft. Borehole Diameter 8.25 in. Casing Stickup Height 1.02 h. Odller Drilling Engineers Rick Rogers Rig CME-55 l-, Blt(s) Hollow Stem Auger •1 Drilling Fluid none Protective Casing `i anodized aluminum Probe Design & Specifications .Basis: Geologic Log X Geophysical Log — -1 Casing string(s): C - Casing S a Screen - _ Depth String(s) Elevation 1 _1 • 1.02 - 6.0 6.0 - 36.0 Cl SI 4604,00 - 4797.04 4797.04 - 4707.04 Casing: CI 1s diameter Sch.40 PVC flush threaded w/ o -rings Screen: Si 1 • scn. 40 PV C flush treaded wl o -rings 0.010" Machine Slot Filter Pack: 1/4° Pea gravel (38.0'-4.0') 16/40 Filter Sane (4.0'-3.0') Surface Seal: Concrete (2.0' Bentonite Seal: Bentonite chips (3.0'-2.0') Construction Time log: Start Task Date Time Drilling auger Geophys.Logging Casing: Filter Placement: Cementing: w= a mm 3/27/92 9115 WA 1200 1215 1230 Finish Date Time a WA a 1200 WA 1215 10 •245 Comments Comments: Supervised by JOb Number J. Cummins 913-2403 Site Central Weld Sanitary Landfill Fila Name 24032614 93106'! Probe No. so -1s LANDFILL GAS Boring No. X -Ref: MONITORING PROBE CONSTRUCTION SUMMARY 10 -25 30 35 40 1 Survey Coords: Northing: 371228.82 rt. Elevation Ground Level 4793.26 R. NGVD Easting: 219380014 It Top Of PVC Casing 4794.83 ft. NGVD Drilling Summary: Total Depth 33.0 ft. Borehole Diameter 8.25 In. Casing Stickup Height 1.57 It, Driller Drilling Engineers Rick Rogers j -, Rig CME-55 I Bit(s) Hollow Stem Auger Drilling Fluid none Protective Casing 5' anodized aluminum Probe Design & Specifications - Basis: Geologic Log X Geophysical Log - Casing string(s): C - Casing S - Screen Depth I String(s) .1.57 - 6.0 C1 6.0 - 31.0 51 Elevation 4794.83 - 4737.20 4787.26 - 4762.26 Casing: C1 1" diameter Sch.40 PVC flush threaded w/ 0-f ngs Screen: S1 1" Sch. 40 PVC flush threaded w/ 0 -rings 0.010" Machine Slot Filter Pack: 1/4' Pea gravel (33.0'-4.0') 16/40 Filter Sand (4.0'-3.0') Surface Seal: Concrete (2.0'-0.0') Bentonite Seal: Bentonite chips (3.0'-2.0) Construction lime log: Start Task Date Time Drilling auger Geophys.Logging Casing: Filter Placement: Cementing: N/A 3126^2 3126162 ]/2$164 1x 1466 Finish Date Time ww 3rzetn 3/20192 3/26192 1660 WA 1614 1666 1916 Comments Not to Scale Comments: Supervised by Job Number J. Crampons 913..2403 Site Central Weld Sanitary Landfill File Name 24033(315 9...21061 • f -40 35 Probe No. SG -16 LANDFILL GAS Boring No. X -Ref: MONITORING PROBE CONSTRUCTION SUMMARY Survey Coords: Northing: 371047.19 ft. Elevation Ground Level 4818.76 n. NGVO Easting: 2102962.09 ft. Top of PVC Casing 4820.28 ft. NGVD Drilling Summary: Total Depth 38.0 ft. Borehole Diameter 7.25 in. Casing Stickup Heignt 1.52 ft. Driller Drilling Engineers Rick Rogers Rig CME-55 Sit(s) Hollow Stem Auger Drilling Fluid none Protective Casing 5' anodized aluminum Probe Design & Specifications Basis: Geologic Log X Geophysical Log - Casing string(s): C - Casing S - Screen Depth . 1.52 - 6.0 6.0 - 36.0 String(s) C1 St Elevation 420.29 - 44112.76 4812.76 - 1782.76 Casing: C1 1' diameter Sch.40 PVC flush threaded w/ o -r ngs jsereen: SI is $ch. 40 PVC flush threaded w/ o -rings 0.010 Macnine Slot Filter Pack: 1/4- Pea gravel (38.0'-4.0) 16/40 Filter Sand (4.0'-3.0') Surface Seal: Concrete (2.0'-0.0') Bentonite Seal: Bentonite chips (3,(I-2.0') Construction Time log: Start Finish Task Date Time Date Time Drilling .Y9N Ot17N2 lava y,lp2 11426 Geophys.Logging Casing: Filter Placement: Cementing: WA WA WA 3117/02 1400 Sli7/92 sty/et Y17)e2 'Als r*30 1/1792 ai11M WA rare 1400 redo Comments Net to Scole Comments: Supervised by J. dremeene Job Number 911-2403 Sae Central Weld Sanitary Landoll File Herne 24035616 9310641 ' Probe No. SG -17 r0 5 10 r''-0 25 35 n -- I E LANDFILL GAS Boring No. X -Ref: MONITORING PROBE CONSTRUCTION SUMMARY Survey Coords: Northing: 372272.54 rt. Elevation Ground Level 482'.85 ft. NGVD Fasting: 21s27eg.tu R To of PVC Casing 4823.45 h. NGVO Drilling Summary: Total Depth 38.0 tt. Borehole Diameter 7.25 in, Casing Stickup Height 1.60 n. Driller Drilling Engineers Rick Rogers Rig CME-55 Bit(s) Hollow Stem Auger Drilling Fluid none Protective Casing 5' anodized aluminum Probe Design & Specifications Basis: Geologic Log X Geophysical Log Casing string(s): C - Casing S - Screen Depth String(s) Elevation . 1.60 - 6.0 C1 6.0 - 36,0 51 4823.45 - 4815.85 4815.85 - 4785.85 Casing: Cl 1- diameter Sch.40 PVC flush threaded wl o -rings Screen: Si r Sch. 40 PVC flush threaded w/ o -rings 0.01b' Machine Slot Filter Pack: 1/4- Pea gravel (38.0'-4.0') 16/40 Filter Sand (4.0'-3.0') Surface Seal: Concrete (2.0'-0.0') Bentonite Seal: Bentonite chips (3.0'-2.0') Task Drilling auger (0.0'-110) auger (33.0•-44.11 Geophys.Logging Casing: Filter Placement: Cementing: Construction Time log: Start Date Time Finish Date Time 3114M2 1888 311M2 1730 3117na ,030 3111/92 1118 w/ WA WA A 3117192 Ilia 3117102 /I7/92 3I17/92 1150 1145 .100 3/17192 3117/92 N/A 1130 1146 1215 Comments Not to Scale Comments: Supervised by Job Number J. Cremeene 913-2403 Site Central Weld Sanitary Landfill File Name 24035G17 a-4064 1 10 =I -1' 5 720 25 30 4,10 35 -40 Probe No. se -la LANDFILL GAS Boring No. X -Ref: MONITORING PROBE CONSTRUCTION SUMMARY Survey Coords: Northing: 372ee2.59 it. Elevation Ground Level 4827.56 ft. NGVD Easting: 2122763.ot it. Top of PVC Casing 4829.20 tt. NGVD Drilling Summary: Total Depth 38.0 h. Borehole Diameter 7.25 in. Casing Stickup Height 1.641t. Driller Defiling Engineers Rick Rogers Rig CME-55 Bit(s) Hollow Stem Auger Drilling Fluid none Protective Casing 5' anodized aluminum r Probe Design & Specifications 7 Basis: Geologic Log X Geophysical Log Casing string(s): C - Casing S - Screen Depth . 1.64 - 6.0 6.0 - 36.0 -7L--1 L i String(s) Elevation C1 S1 429.20 - 4821.5E 4.521.50 4 Casing: Cl 1' diameter $ch.40 PVC flush threaded w/ 0 -rings - 1791.56 Screen: Si 1' Sch. 40 PVC flush threaded w/ o -rings 0.010' Machine Slot 1 Filter Pack: 1/4' Pea gravel (38.0'-4.0') 16/40 Filter Sand (4.0'-3.0') r l Surface Seal: Concrete (2.0'-0.0') Not to Scale Bentonite Seal: Bentonite chips (3.0'-2.0') I Comments: Construction Time log: Stan Task Data Time Drilling Auger Geophys.Logging Casing: Filter Placement: Cementing: 3,7192 0748 WA WA 3117192 098 3/,7/02 3,7/027192 1000 ,015 Finish Date Tme 3,7/02 WA 3/17102 3117/92 317192 094 NIA '000 1013 1030 Comments Supervised by Job Number J. Cremeena 913-2403 File Name 2403SG 18 Site Central Weld Sanitary Landfill 931061. Probe No. SG -19 LANDFILL GAS Boring No. X -Ref: MONITORING PROBE CONSTRUCTION SUMMARY Survey COords: Northing: 373244.01 rt. Elevation Ground Level 4835.94 ft. NGVD Easting: 2192772.74 it Top of PVC Casing 4837.58 h. NGVD -10 x-20 2 30 35 Drilling Summary: Total Depth 38.0 it. Borehole Diameter 8.25 in. Casing Stickup Height 1.64 It Driller Drilling Engineers Rick Rogers Rig CME-55 Bit(s) Hollow Stem Auger Drilling Fluid none Protective Casing 5' anodized aluminum Probe Design & Specifications Basis: Geologic Log X Geophysical Log Casing string(s): C - Casing S - Screen Depth String(s) Elevation . 1.64 - 6.0 CI 4937.53 - 4829.94 6.0 - 36.0 SI 429.94 - 4799.94 m - Casing: C1 1" diameter Sch.40 PVC flush threaded w/ o -r ngs Screen: S1 1" Sch. 40 PVC flush threaded w/o -nags 0.010" Macnme Slot ! , Filter Pack 1/4• Pea gravel 16/40 Filter Sand (4.0'-3.C') Surface Seal: Concrete (2.0'-0.0') Bentonite Seal: Bentonite chips (3.0'-2.0') Construction Time log: Stan Finish Task Date Time Date Time Drilling au9sr 2/751.702 1•00 17±72 Zia GeoPhYs.Lo99ing WA WA WA w� Casing: 0aifl2 1720 1/71/02 1750 Filter Placement: Cementing: 317102 22172 1750 172S 32'!72 5172O/2 1726 mai Comments Not to Sccle Comments: Supervised by Job Number J. Cremssm 913-2403 Fa• Name .4035G19 Sals Central Weld Sanitary landfill 921061 Probe No. SG -20 • • • 0 15 -20 -25 -30 35 40 viola Not to Scale LANDFILL GAS Boring No. X -Ref: MONITORING PROBE CONSTRUCTION SUMMARY Survey Coords: Northing: 373230.66 ft. Elevation Ground Level 4827.18 It. NGVD Ewing: 2192267,81 e. Top of PVC Casing 4828.79 ft. NGVD Drilling Summary: Total Depth 33.0 ft. Borehole Diameter 8.25 In, Casing Stickup Height 1,83 it. Driller Drilling Engineers Rick Rogers Rig CME-55 Bits) Hollow Stem Auger Drilling Fluid none Protective Casing 5' anodized aluminum Probe Design & Specifications Basis: Geologic Log X Geophysical Log Casing string(s): C - Casing S - Screen Depth String(s) Elevation 4 1_63 - 6.0 6,0 31.0 Cl 4825.79 - 4821.19 St 4821.16 - 4796.16 Casing: C1 1' diameter SCh.40 PVC flush threaded wi 0 -rings Screen: S1 1' Sch. 40 PVC flush threaded w/ 0 -rings 0.010" Macnme Slot Filter Pack: 1/4" Pea gravel (33.0'-4.0') 16/40 Filter Sand (4.0'-3.0') Surface Seal: Concrete (2.0'.0.0') Bentonite Seal: Bentonite Chips (3.0'-2.0') Construction Time log: Stan Task Date Time Drilling sugar Geophys.Logging Casing: Filter Placement: Cementing: WA 3RIN2 312us2 3a4e2 0746 14/A 10u 11,6 130 Finish Date Time WA 3/24/12 32492 3124/02 Comments Comments: Supervised by Job Number J. Cremeena 913-2403 Fits Nam. 24035G20 Site Central Weld Sanitary Landfill 931061 Probe No. so-zi 5 -10 -15 3/20 5 30 35 40 3/l Not to Scale LANDFILL GAS Boring No. X -Ref: MONITORING PROBE CONSTRUCTION SUMMARY Survey Coords: Northing: 370235.37n. Elevation Ground Level 4829.81 ft. NGVO Easting: 2191525.07 R. Top of PVC Casing 4831.20 ft. NGVO Drilling Summary: Total Depth 33.0 h. Borehole Diameter 8.25 in, Casing Stickup Height 1.39 ft. Driller Drilling Engineers Rick Rogers Rig CME-55 Bit(s) Hollow Stem Auger Drilling Fluid none Protective Casing 5' anodized aluminum Probe Design & Specifications Basis: Geologic Log X Geophysical Log Casing string(s): C - Casing S . Screen Depth . 1.39 - 6.0 6.0 - 21.0 21.0 - 30.0 String(s) C1 S1 S2 Elevation 4831.20 - 4823.81 4823.81 - 4808.81 4808.81 - 4799.81 Casing: C1 1" diameter Sch.40 PVC flush threaded w/ 0-r ngs Screen: St Y son. a0 PVC. flush airflow w/ crimps 0,010' Machine Slot S2 r SCA. 40 PVC, Moen 0veaded w/ 0-nnpe 0.020' Machine Slot Filter Pack: 1/4• Pea gravel (33,0'-4.0') 16/40 Filter Sand (4.0'-3.0') Surface Seal: Concrete (2.0'-0.0') Bentonite Seal: Bentonite chits (3.0'-2.0') Construction Time log: Start Task Date Time Drilling Wier Geophys.L0gging Casing: Filter Placement: Cementing: 126/112 N/A 2124/92 1/24012 121{ N/A TAXI NOS "Co Finish Date Time iR492 WA 3/26/21 1/2,/01 1410 N/A 14.4 1500 ISIS Comments Comments: Supetviee0 by J. Crimean. Site Central Weld Sanitary Landfill Job Number 913-2403 File Nuns 24035021 931064 ea:r kip\�yila.i ��'. MAJOR DIVISIONS GRAPHIC SYMBOL GROUP SYMBOL TYPICAL DESCRIPTIONS CGRAM.aurEss APO• :..�_. ; • �-•- rut 1.01-00,00 CUM; Calmtlen•o3 wawa. Lank a< .e .,.a COMIC CRAMED CRAKLLY SOBS Oa ma) , • •••- • • • /` r V roanb.am a..at CUM - solo mann umw E a rwa SOBS want now 50% Of COUP' Iw SLEW ir y I 'w , A I ;. •l . w r„• -walla CY M SUM rps, CLAM -S e -qt M TWAA I( OM) \\ G C CLAM 4Hns w.O-1.2m0a.+ .n:t wawa( Mw was SAND SAma HOY CUM SAND •• • 'r, ; " '.. .• SW Kl1-04‘021) SWOS. await Sw.Oi umf a NO n.a Of W TTPU4 is �. ZOO SOU S S p 110011.1-c■.am S..0i wr2u r a.os. um,a .o n.0 ua M.. soy. 00 Ca.■S[ M.KTIO. VC SAMOS WITH MCS ten. 4`1'1'1ii: is iii'•.:: Yi1I:i... SM xrt s..or, sA.o-I t wander! crM.w i z: n.[S) .7`t, S C MKr ynoz• zuo-MV wrry■cz SINS I i I I I H MI L no■rrsu t s +.o wan MK LAOS. ■act 01.0404 are a curer n[ Wen a MK/ AIS .InI Susan mare FlHE `SOILS uawo uwt AMD 5.4i't MN1 SOX P N .\\' \\\` ` \ C L noar.c Mn a war TO mom nwsnm.. wvrwur EM CLAYS s+.,o. CLAFLA Mfl' ClAIMIL tCAIIW Mrs O L ocr.wc Mn Me afw,wc S■M Cuff of LOW nws+lolr want MAW 503 li I l! �Ini it M Hi naU+c an. wuaaos a aw5 LAO 0* w+ WS a W•1104•• u ww.I MO. 20e SOW s0I sIl7S ono I(.■Y ARO MM 503 C H 1 1 fan0■C4.C Cure a RRSI Mr*" T Cnn CLOS O H o■a.nc CUTS Of MOWS ro wCr MASnON,. O■ssc an ORCAMC .Wf. sw..w 50■s ..c.. HId1LY SOILS PT n ON eRaK COCOS ..16 —' Sfw0.{ r[ VSO A HOICAIT mofnu•C I-. 4�pR >.I ROCK ?.•.•'' • • • •.' s.Msiowt rtM .•M•. CNCIIp[ Golder �88odalts Denver, Colorado nnE SOIL ANO ROCK CLASSIFICATION CHART ci.tort/PRO.,CCT WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL ORAwn 0AIE I 923-2403 �� ISCwd NOT '0 SG,I`(Owc „8.JR1'. r.0. JAc Not SC Pw zwsr�s.aMe 'iejst Ewa Ina' No. AGAJRE „O. Nay 1 931061 35 40 !Not to Scale Well No. Boring No. X -Ref: MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION SUMMARY GWMW-$N Survey Coords Northing: 370694.25 rt. Elevation Ground Level 4759.49 ft. NGVO Easting: 2193694.44 It. Top of PVC Casing 4761.92 ft. NGVO Drilling Summary: Total Depth 30.5 ft. Borehole Diameter 8.25 in. Casing Stickup Height Z431t. Driller Drilling Engineers Rick Rogers Rig CME-55 Bit(s) Hollow Stem Auger 4,25' ID Drilling Fluid air Protective Casing 7' anodized aluminum Well Design & Specifications . Basis: Geologic Log X Geophysical Log Casing string(s): C - Casing S - Screen Depth + 2.43 - 20.0 20.0 - 30.0 Strings) Elevation Cl Si 4751.92 - 4730.49 4739.49 - 4729.49 Casing: CI 2' diameter Sch.40 PVC flush threaded wl 0 -rings, Teflon taped Joints Screen: S7 2' diameter Sch.a° PVC flush threaded w/ 0 -rings. Teflon taped points. 0 D10' macnine cut slots Flier Pact 10/20 Silica Sand (30.5'-17.0) 16/40 Silica Sand (17.0'-16.S') Grout Seal: Portland Cement/Bentonite Powder 8:1 mixture (13.5'-2.0') Bentonite Seal: 318' Bentonite chios (16.5'-13.5') Surface Seal: Concrete (2.5-0.0') Task Drilling Hollow stem Auger Geophys•LO9gin9 Casing: 2'10 5011.40 PVC Filter Placement: Cementing: Development Construction Time log: Start Date Time WA 5/26102 WW2 9870192 1130 WA 0746 0746 0616 ono Finish Date Time LAI99 W. A lane 0746 Wr- 070 MIS 0900 1630 Well Development Well was developed lot eight hours by hand bailing with a stainless steel bailer Stabilization Test Data: Time OH 1 Spec. Cond.* Temp ('19 0730 8.98 6.44 512 0955 7.11 638 60.1 1745 734 634 59.4 1345 7.11 8.18 80.9 1530 720 5.92 582 u,tios/cm x 1000 Recovery Data: N/A a- 100 e0 00 A 7100 e0 e0 ro 30 zo 1O 0 Comments: So. Supervised by J. Cremates Sas Central Wed Sanitary Landfill Job Number 913-2403 Flt Name 2403GW5N 931061 • 35 Well No. Gwluw-06 Boring No. X -Ref: MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION SUMMARY Survey Coords Northing: 1a4e.4o n. Elevation Ground Level 4769.46 ft. MSL Easing: ate R Top of PVC Casing 4772.07 ft. MSL Drilling Summary: Total Depth 30.0 ft. Borehole Diameter 7.25 in. Casing Stickup Height 2.61 ft. Driller Drilling Engineers Rick Rogers Rig CME-55 Bit(s) Hollow Stem Auger Drilling Fluid none Protective Casing 6' x r, 7' long. anodized aluminum Well Design & Specifications Basis: Geologic Log X Geophysical Log Casing string(s): C - Casing S - Screen Construction Time log Stan Task Date Time Drilling Haw.. stem Auger Geophys.Logging Casing: 2' 10 Sen.4o PVC Filter Placement: Cementing: Development 211&C WA 2/I U/fl 211 VW v11192 n ene teal WA 1356 1315 1400 0035 Finish Date Time mun WA 2/1581 Vteel 3/19/( WA 101° 1.00 1735 1355 Well Development Well was developed by four hours of pumping Depth String(s) Elevation with a Hydrostar Dump •2.61 - 9.0 C1 9.0 - 29.0 S1 4772.07 4760.46 Casing: C7 r diameter Sch.40 PVC . 1760.48 - 4740.45 flush threaded w/ O -rings. Teflon taped joints Screen: Si r diameter Scn.40 PVC flush threaded W/ O -rings. Teflon taped joints. 0.010' machine cut :Jots Filter Pact 10/20 Sillea Sand•(30,0'-7.0') 20/40 Silica Sand (4.0'-3.5') Grout Seal: Portland Cement/Bentonite Powder 8:1 mixture (3.5'-0.0D Bentonite Seal: 318' 3entonite chips (7.0'•.4.0') Stabilization Test Data Time pH 1110 j 5.13 1120 I 7.13 1205 j 6.00 1335 I 6.28 1340 jWA I Spec. Cond.1 Temp (eF) 4.82 I 54.0 5.93 I 50.5 4.97 1 65.0 5.40 53.7 5.30 i 54.8 ' umhos/cm x 1000 Recovery Data: Qa 2 °e •0 e0 $ 70 CO 00 30 20 I0 Sow 5.45 hr I t Ii I I! 1 I I ! i II o z • • TIME (Minutes) e 10 Not to Scole Comments: apennsed by Job Number J- Cremates 910-.2403 Sale Pile Nam* 2401GWe Carrel Weld Sanitary Landfill 931061 Well No. GWMW-07 -10 -15 20 -25 30 35 40 Not to Sccle Boring No. X -Ref: MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION SUMMARY Survey Coordx Northing 514.7 R Elevation Ground Level 4760.58 ft. MSL Easting: sa1.s1 rr Top of PVC Casing 4763.26 ft. MSL Drilling Summary: Total Depth 25,5 ft. Borehole Diameter 7.25 in. Casing Stickup Height 268 ft. Griller Drilling Engineers Rick Rogers Rig CME-55 Bit(s) Hollow Stem Auger Drilling Fluid none Protective Casing 7' anodized aluminum Well Design & Specifications Basis: Geologic Log X Geophysical Log Casing String(s): C - Casing S - Screen Depth . 2.68 - 13.0 13.0 - 23.0 String(s) Elevation Cl i 4761,26 - 4747.58 S1 £747.54 - 47375a Casing: Cl 2' diameter Sch.40 PVC flush threaded w/ 0 -rings. Teflon taped joints Screen: Si 2' diameter Scn.40 PVC flush threaded w/ 0 -rings. Teflon taped Joints. 0.010' machine cut sicts Rite, Pact 10120 Silica Sand (25.0'-8.0') 16/40 Silica Sand (8.0'-6.0') 16/40 Silica Sand (x.0'4.5') Grout Seal: Portland Cement/Bentonite Powder 8:1 mixture (2.5'-0.0') Bentonite Seat: 3/8' Bentonite chips (6.0'-3.0') Construction Time log: Stan Task Date Time Drilling 140110+ Sim Auger Ge0Phys.LogQing Casing: 2' IO Sen.40 PVC Filter Placement: Cementing: Development •2117102 WA 717/4 v�7)12 2117/72 3120/n Y21/92 wa N/A lees ¶015 1005 1210 2172 Rnisn Date Time 71714 WA 7117777 2117107 2117/92 ]tarn 7121112 1000 iota 1043 1130 !sop aaaa Well Development Well was deveiooed by four hours of pumping with a Hydrostar pump Stabilization Test Data: Time I pH I Soec. Cond. Temp ('F) 54.1 54.4 49.8 1315 1510 08a2 0915 0950 6.10 5.84 3.90 5.80 I 5.80 6.06 I 5.06 6.12 5.74 J 50.1 5.61 j 50.1 ' umhos/cm x 1000 Recovery Data: 0- 1.4 00 CO SO 70 w e0 so 20 1O' 11 I 1 1 :3 . 1 1 o z 4 • , e 10 17. 1♦ 1• 10 Sou 6.1 I I I 1 I i_j' I I, I 1 r I „ I III 1II II I11i i I•I iis1 .. Ir ; ; I I , , 3 !III II. I''''I iI Comments: TIME (Minutes) Supervised by _ JOD Number J. Cremeene Ste 913-2403 Commit WaM Sanitary Landfill Re Name 2403GW7 921061 ^50 -60 -70 a 80: Well No. GWMW-08 Boring No. X -Ref: MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION SUMMARY Survey Coords: NOnhing: 373232.058 Easting: 2101400.74 It Elevation Ground Level Top of PVC Casing 4831.74 rt. NGVD 4833.98 ft. NGVD Drilling Summary: Total Depth 81.0 ft. Borehole Diameter 80 in, Casing Stickup Height 2.24 It. Driller Drilling Engineers Rick Rogers Rig CME-55 Bit(s) Hollow Stem Auger, Tri-cone'viler. NX Core Drilling Fluid none Protective Casing 7anodized aluminum Well Design & Specifications �i Basis: Geologic Log X Geophysical Log Casing string(s): C - Casing S - Screen Depth • 2.24 - 70.0 70.0 - 80.0 1.0 - 44,0 Strin. s) Elevation C1 4233.96 - 4761.74 Si 4761.74 - 4751.74 C2 4a30.74 - 4787.74 Casing: C1 2' diameter Sch.40 PVC flush threaded W/O -rings. Teflon taped joints C2 6' 10 steel casing Screen: Si 2" diameter Sch.40 PVC flush threaded wr 0 -rings, Teflon taped joints, al 0' machine cut slots Filter Pact 10/20 Silica Sand (81,0'-67.0') Grout Seal: Portland Cement/Bentonite Powder 8:1 mixture (64.O'-3.0') Bentonite Seal: 3/8' Bentonite chips (67.0'-64.0') Surface Seal: Concrete (3.0'-0.0') Construction Time tog; Start Task Date Time Drilling Hollow Stem Auger 31002 1230 Coring 0wA60 0p0 Geophys.Logging Casing: 6' Steal 2' Sch.40 PVC Filter Placement: Cementing: Development WA vino 1101 0 MA 1000 190 1000 nz ,2aa Finish Date Time yae¢ 214/02 WA 315/02 '3110192 3(11/97 3i11/92 116172 1700 190 WA 1300 lade 1130 1204 1030 Well Development Well was developed by four hours of pumping with a Hydrostar pump Stabilization Test Data: Time pH l Spec. Conc.1 5.04 6.75 5.84 5.80 Tamp ('F) 47.0 54.4 54.9 53.7 52.9 1256 1405 1545 1600 16.20 1 5,71 7.10 7.06 7.02 I 5.78 7.07 ' umhosicm x 1000 Recovery Data Qs 0.89 110 100 so SO 70 e0 00 40 .30 20 0 Sow 48.2 1.— —4- i r ♦ i 1 . I i i i 0 r S 12 1e 20 24 25 32 TIME (Minutes) Comments: Centralizers located at 35' and 50'. Hollow stem auger used prom 0.0'- 65.0'. NX core used from 55.0'-79.81.Telcore bit used from 65.0'-79.8: Supervised by Job Number Site Central Weld Solitary Landfill Ale Name 2403GW6 921061 ' ^80 Well No. GWMW-C9 Boring No. X -Ref: _ MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION SUMMARY Survey Coords: Northing: 3732a.71 ft. EastInc: 2192751.56 R Elevation Ground Level 4836.22 ft. NGVO Top of PVC Casing 4838.37 ft. NGVD Drilling Summary: Total Depth 75.0 ft. Borehole Diameter 5.63 In. Casing Stickup Height 2.15 ft. Driller Drilling Engineers Rick Rogers Rig CME-55 Blt(s) Hollow Stem Auger, Tri-cone /rile/, NX Core Drilling Fluid air Protective Casing 6" x 6', 7 long, anodized aluminum Well Design & Specifications • Basis: Geologic Log X Geophysical Log Casing string(s): C - Casing S - Screen Not to Scale Depth Strings) Elevation . 2.15 - 65.0 I Cl 65.0 - 75.0 S1 1.0 - 35.0 C2 4639.37 - 4771.22 4771.22 - 4761.22 4615.22 - 490172 Casing: C7 2' diameter Sch.40 PVC flush threaded wl 0 -rings. Teflon taped joints C2 6' ID steel casing Screen: S1 2" diameter Scn.40 PVC flush threaded wl 0 -rings. Teflon taped lomts. O,4S101' machine cut soots Filter Pack: 10/20 Silica Sand (7S.0'-62.0') Grout Seal: Portland Cament/Bentonite Powder 8:1 mixture (50.0'-2.0') Bentonite Seal: 3/8' Bentonite chips (620'-50.0') Surface Seal: Concrete (2.0'-0.0') Task Drilling Auger to 35' Connq to 72' Resin to 75' Geophys.Logging Casing: 6' Steel Y 0 Sch.40 PVC Filter Placement: Cementing: Development Construction Time log: Stan Date Tina zrwia 2121042 2/16/92 WA 2714492 2726/94 2!19192 2716/92 3/17/91 42 9 1102 1110 1600 14% 1930 1644 1719 1230 0430 Finish Date Time rars2 2/1972 7129112 WA 21129192 2/:6721 229192 2/25/42 3/17/91 0114192 1ma 1644 171s 1730 1640 0946 Well Development Well was developed by tour hours of pumping with a Hydrostat pump Stabilization Test Data: Time i pH Spec. Cond.i Temp (eF) 1305 I 6.68 4.92 50.4 1405 7.10 5.90 47.7 1515 7.38 5.93 47.8 1540 7.93 5.61 48.8 0842 i 7.32 4.98 52.9 0935 l WA 4.86 51.7 um cm x ecovery ata: 0- 0.15 100 •0 eo 70 40 so w JO 20 10 0 So- 58 0 20 `0 e0 00 100 TIME (Minutes) Comments: Centralizers located at 15, 30' and 50'. Hollow stem auger used from 0.0'- 35.0'. NX core used from 35.0'-722. Tri-cone bit used from 35.0'-75.0'. Supervied by Job Number J. Crameene 913-2403 Sit* Central Weld Sanitary landfill File Name 2403Ow9 9, Well No. GWMW-1g '10 -20 -.30 -40 0 0 -70 -80 Boring No. X -Ref: MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION SUMMARY Survey Coords: Northing: Easting: 371940.04 ft. Elevation Ground Level 4813.70 ft. NGVD z19a27.o0 h. Top of PVC Casing 4816.09 ft. NGVD Drilling Summary. Total Depth 61.0 ft. Borehole Diameter 8.00 in. Casing Stickup Height 2.39 ft. Driller Drilling Engineers Rick Rogers Rig CMI=-55 Bit(s) Hollow Stem Auger, Tn-cone Toiler. NIX Core Drilling Fluid air Protective Casing 6" x 6', 7' long, anodized aluminum Well Design & Specifications Basis: Geologic Log X Geophysical Log Casing string(s): C - Casing S - Screen Depth Shin (s) Elevation . 2.39 - 50.0 C1 4810.09 - 4763.70 50.0 - 60.0 S1 4763.70 - 4753.70 1.0 - 0.10 C2 4812.70 - 4770.70 Casing: C1 2" diameter Sch.40 PVC flush threaded W/O -rings, Teflon taped Joints C2 6" ID steel casing Screen: St 2' diameter Sch.40 PVC flush threaded w/ O -rings, Teflon taped points, 0.010' machine cut slots Filter Pack: 10/20 Silica Sand (61.0'-47.0') Grout Seal: Portland Cement/Bentonite Powder 8:1 mixture (44.0'-2.0') Bentonite Seal: Surface Seal: 3/8" Bentonite chips (47.0'-44.0') Concrete (2.0'-0.0') Construction Time log: Start Task Date Time Drilling Hollow Stem Auger Via/02 1100 3h9190 ,ae Core 3110192 0600 3r1eN2 t200 Finish Date Time Geophys.Logging Casing: e' 2ee1 2' IC Soh.40 pvc Filter Placement: Cementing: Development WA WA WA WA 3116192 1210 allow 1314 3nW9i ISIS 3119190 1344 311e1P2 1346 Wiener 1 xi 31,9192 1430 311942 1616 3114/92 12R mein e00 Well Development Well was developed by four hours of pumping with a Hydrostar pump Stabilization Test Data: Time I pH I Spec. Cond.'i Temp ('F) 59.4 57.3 59.6 57.4 1335 1 7.45 1346 1525 I 7.46 1559 7.34 I 5.52 5.31 5.30 5.42 7.33 i f umhos/cm x 1000 Recovery Data: 0— 0.16 00 *0 *0 70 •0 e0 so so 20 100 Sow 47.1 i� 0 10 20 30 TIME (Minutes) 40 1 00 Not to Scale Comments: Centralizers located at 15' and 30'. Holow stern auger used from 0.0'-45.0: NX Core used from 45.0'-59.3'. Tri-cone bit used from 45.0'-60.0'. Supervised by Job Number J. Cremeens 913-2403 Site File Name 24033W10 10 Central Weld Sanitary Landfill 93106"! 30 -60 -70 -80 Well No. GwMw-11 Boring No. X -Ref: MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION SUMMARY Survey Coords: Northing: szimaz7oa. Elevation Ground Level 4754.31 ft. NGVD Easting: 2192380ae it. Top of PVC Casing 4756.82 ft. NGVO Drilling Summary: Total Depth 61.0 ft. Borehole Diameter 8.00 in. Casing StICkup Height 2.51 ft. Driller Drilling Engineers Rick Rogers Rig CME-55 Bit(s) Hollow Stem Auger. Tri-cone roller. NX Core Drilling Fluid air Protective Casing 7' anodized aluminum Well Design & Specifications Basis: Geologic Log X Geophysical Log Casing string(s): C - Casing S - Screen Depth String(s) Elevation .2.si - 50.0 50.0 - 60.0 1.0 - 44.0 C1 4756.62 S1 C2 - 4704.31 4704.31 - 4094.31 4753.31 - 47.1031 Casing: Ci 2' diameter Sch.40 PVC flush threaded wl 0 -rings, lotion taped joints C2 6' ID steel casing . Screen: S1 2' diameter Sch.40 PVC bush threaded W/ O -rings. Teflon taped joints, 0.010' machine cut slots Filter Pack: 10/20 Silica Sand (60.0'-47.0') Grout Seal: Portland Cement/Bentonite Powder 8:1 mixture (44.0'-3.0') Bentonite Seal: 3/8' Bentonite chips (47.0'-49.0') Surface Seal: Concrete (3.0'-0.0') Construction Time log: Start Task Date Time Drilling HOUow St.m Auger 3n09 1400 Ca. 3nfn[ 0030 Geophys.Logging Casing: 6' Steel 2' i0 Sch.40 PVC Filter Placement: Cementing: Development 32192 3202 V3192 3/3/92 311./02 W� 1926 1116 1620 1716 1067 Finish Date Time 312/02 3r2M2 WA 3/7/02 31302 3'31112 312102 teat 1016 NM iW 1600 1716 1630 1467 Well Development Well was developed by four hours of pumping with a Hvdrostar pump Stabilization Test Data: Time pH Spec. Conti' Temp (•F) 1113 7.07 4.25 58.9 1410 7.35 5.36 60.0 1430 I 7.41 5.35 60.8 1445 7.36 5.54 59.6 ' umhos/cm x 1000 Recovery Data: 100 50 .0 70 .o no M ao 20 0 Sow 15.5 0 2 - a e 10 12 1- a 1s TIME (Hours) Not to Scale Comments: Centralizers located at 10' and 25'. Hollow stem auger used from 0.0'-45.0' NX Core used from 45.0'-59.3'. Tri-cone bit used from SuP.rvi..d by Job Number J. Crimean. 913-2403 RM Name 2403GW11 St. Canine Weld Sanitary Landfill 931061 Well No. GWMW-12 Boring No. X -Ref: -o -10 -20 -30 -40 -50 -60 -70 80 MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION SUMMARY survey Coords: Northing: routes rt. Elevation Ground Level 4759.40 ft. NGVD Casting: 2193901.48 n. Top of PVC Casing 4761.93 n. NGVD Drilling Summary: Total Depth 69.0 ft. Borehole Diameter 5.63 in, Casing Stickup Height 2.53 ft. Driller Drilling Engineers Rick Rogers Rig CME-55 Bit(s) Hollow Stem Auger, . Tn-cone roller, NX Core OriWng Fluid air Protective Casing 6" x 6'. 7' long, anodized aluminum Well Design & Specifications Basin: Geologic LOg X Geophysical Log Casing string(s): C - Casing S - Screen Depth , Strine s) Elevation ♦ 2.53 - 58.0 C1 4761,93 - 4701,40 58.0 - 68.0 S1 4701.40 - 4611.40 1.0 - 45,0 C2 4754.40 - 47440 Casing: Cl 2' diameter Sch.40 PVC flush threaded wl O -rings, Teflon taped joints C2 6" ID steel casing Screen: St 2' diameter Sch.40 PVC flush threaded wl O -rings, Teflon taped lams. 0.010' machine cct slots Filter Pact 10/20 Silica Sand (68.0'-55.0') Grout Seal: Portland Cement/Bentonite Powder 8:1 mixture (52.0'-3.0') Bentonite Seal: 3/8" Bentonite chips (55.0'-52.0') Surface Seal: Concrete (3.0'-0.0') Construction Time log: Start Task Date Time Dmiing A90*(1046' Coring to eo' Ream to e6' Geophystogging Casing: 6' St4N 2' iD Sch.40 PVC Filter Placement: Cementing: Development 2/0/02 2124102 2/7)1102 WA 2/27/02 3/2102 212/02 3/2/92 2177102 Well Development Well was developed by four hours of pumping with a Hydrostat pump Stabilization Test Data: Time pH S0ec. Cond.'" Temp (eF) 1801 7.24 5.83 56.1 0809 7.18 8.34 53.3 0904 7.39 8.49 54.6 0953 7.43 I 8.05 55.9 1000 7.51 8.35 54.4 1014 7,04 7.57 59.7 1.101 m x ecovery aata: Q- - ao 1e 10 0 So- 30,9 i _ l r 0 z 4 TIME (Hours) e Not to Scale Comments: Centralizers located at 12' and 32'. Hollow stem auger used from 0.0'-45.0 NX Core used from 45.0'612'. TO -cone bit used from 45.0%89.C. Sup.Meed by J. Crameen. Job Numb.r 913-2403 IRI. Name 2403GW12 Site C.nhal Weed Sanitary Landfill 931061. ' Boring No. X -Ref: '—� MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION SUMMARY Survey Coords Northing: 371eea.9sn. Elevation Ground Level 4769.99 ft. NGVD Fasting: 2191477.48 e. Top of PVC Casing 477218 h. NGVD -0 -10 ..: Drilling Summary. Total Depth 61.0 ft. Construction Time Task log: Start Date Time Finish Date Time Borehole Diameter 8.25 M. Drilling — Ding Stickup 2.19 R. 4494( W10102 ii00 2120492 Ian -20 -30 "� -50 i \ \ .. ... :.: ' ' 1f -Jt - - - Driller Drilling Engineers coring 2autct 0016 2mira Rick Rogers Ream 2/71102 1416 Zttbx 14.6 GeOphys.Loggino N.G. NIA SA NIA Rig CME-55 Casing: _ r, Bit(s) Hollow Stem Auger, a' Steel 2/20/02 tare 2120 ,n0 Tn-cone roller, NX Core 2' I0 Snn.40 PVC mvn WO 2/21s2 tsv Drilling Fluid air Filter Placement: yrn2 1530 2421/02 1430 Protective Casing 7 anodized aluminum Cementing: 7121/02 MO 2121t92 1730 Development smoke: 2 1540 3dae7 1720 3/201,2� =ONO 1030 Well Design & Specifications Basis: Geologic Log X Geophysical Log Casing string(s): C - CCasing S . Screen Well Development Well was developed by four hours of pumping Depth Strin9;s) Elevation with a Hydrostar pump . 2.19 - 50.0 C1 4772.15 - 4719.09 50.0 - 60.0 S1 4719.00 - 4100.00 1.0 - 40.0 C2 4755.99 - 472599 '— - Stabilization Test Data: Time pH Spec. Cond.' Temp (•F) C$ng: Ct r diameter Scn.40 PVC 1620 8.20 4.20 45.5 : _ -_ — .. • - - - r. flush threaded w/ 0 -rings, 1638 7,10 4.58 51.0 Teflon taped Joints 0905 6.06 4,50 52,8 C2 6" 1D steel casing 0923 6.04 4.47 54.3 Screen: Si 2' diameter Scn.40 PVC 1020 6.01 4,48 . 54.1 flush threaded w/ O -rings, Tenon taped Joints, 0.010' machine cut slots ' umnos/cm x 1000 -60 -70 60 Recovery Data: Filter Pack: 10/20 Silica Sand (60.0'-47.0') C)'- So- 4.35 16/40 Silica Sand (44.0'-43.5') 10000 - ---��A- e0 _��ar��rr/rte � Grout Seal: Portland Cement/Bentonite Powder 7•��I�� 40 8:1 mixture (43.5'-3.0') eO nr.��aa ao Bentonite Seal: 318' Bentonite o chips (47.0'.44.0' Z Surface Seal: Concrete (3.0'-0.0') 0 o .0 eo 1 20 140 200 TIME (Minutes) Comments: Hollow stem auger used from 0.0'-45.0' NX Core used from 45.0'-eo.T. Trlcone bit 13xtd from 45.0'801. Not to Scale Supervised by _ Job Number J. Crameens 913-2403 site File Name 2443C1W13 13 Cenrra Weld Sanitary Landfill 93106* a Well No. GWWW-14 Boring No. X -Ref: MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION SUMMARY Survey Coords Northing: 371140.5.4 ft, Elevation Ground Level 4761.24 ft. NGVD Easting: 2192067.6211. Top of PVC Casing 4763.70 ft. NGVD -10 -20 -30 7 80 N Drilling Summary: Total Depth 61.0 ft. Borehole Diameter 8.25 In. Casing Stickup Height 246 ft. Driller Drilling Engineers Rick Rogers Rig CME-55 Bit(s) Hollow Stem Auger, T -cone rofler, MX Core Drilling Fluid air Protective Casing 7' anodized aluminum Well Design & Specifications Basis: Geologic Log X Geophysical Log Casing string(s): C - Casing S - Screen Depth String(s) Elevation + 2.46 - 50.0 50.0 - 60.0 1.0 - 38.0 C7 4763,70 Si C2 - 4711.24 4711.24 - 4701.24 4760.24 - 472324 Casing: Cl 2' diameter Sch.40 PVC Hush threaded WI 0 -rings, Teflon taped joints C2 6• ID steel casing Screen: Si 2• diameter Sch.40 PVC flush threaded wl 0 -rings, Teflon taped joints, 0.1)10' machine cut slots Filter Pact. 10/20 Silica Sand (60.0'-47.0') 16/40 Silica Sand (42.5'-42.0') Grout Seal: Portland CemenUBentonite Powder 8:1 mixture (420'-3,0') Bentonite Seal: Surface Seal: 3/8' Bentonite chips (47.0'.42.5') Concrete (3.0'-0.0') Construction Time log: Start Task Date Time Drilling *CM Coring Ream Geophys.Logging Casing: e• steel 2 ID Sch.40 PVC Filter Placement: Cementing: Development !117112 2/liana 2/20492 WA 2/1702 22(400 1920 1200 1006 ea 1600 1046 1100 1720 1047 Finish Date Time 20702 214412 2210'2 WA 2117/92 224192 2rnO2 2/2002 321192 11100 1400 flat Ni'A IIwo 1100 1200 1600 1464 Well Development Well was developed by four hours of pumping with a Hydrostat' pump Stabilization Test Data: Time I pH J Spec. Cond.'1 Temo('F) 1056 ' 6.21 i 4.62 54.0 1103 6.10 I 4.43 52.6 1315 6.15 J 5.47 53.1 1425 6.40 5.28 53.2 1433 I 6.26 5.75 51.4 L umbos/c{ x 1000 Recovery Data: Qn 100 e0 e0 mz 70 y 40 so M 00 49 20 10 SDet 6.87 7 _ A if T 0 20 40 e0 00 •OO 120 r 1 II ill TIME (M notes) Not to Scale Comments: Hollow stern auger used from 0.0'-41.0'. NX Core used from 4t0'-Sa.7. Tri-cone bt used from 41.0'-58.7. 9uponiard by Job Number .1. Cternson& 913-2403 File Name 2403GW14 Site Central Weld Sanitary Landfill 91064 ;t,.,AF y I'.1-Ff•'.'r.::�/A vrtC.Y,�w. "• .4k. '•. f•� �d "T'1,*` d �7Y: dui M 1 `F{.'YIT� 9$.i`.XfFlr APP])JX F SAMPLE INTEGRITY DATA SHEETS :S"l`'S-441K Jf , a•/n itt" • a �^ •. •1: SAMPLE INTEGRITY DATA SHEET Plant!Site fl.'rwc cina Cousr. 4.4..onet. Site Location st-dfaK../, CO Sampling Location 66JfIt4J / Project No. at3.2'ten Sample ID Cairncj / Technical Procedure Reference(s) Type of Sampler CC e %e- Oate 3/27 ?7 T'ne '2y; Media Station Sample Type: .ra'. time composite space composite Sample Acquisition Measurements (depth, volume of static well water and pureed water, etc.) o,,.., ( 4.44-r 4 I.s', tUArc'Z Sample Description pal, bra.+.. 7 Field Measurements on Sample (pH, conductivity, etc.) 4e —T st 3• r ro-J 3.67,notn, v-l.,a t... pit 3s — Aliquot Amount (*flat} Qr5s. vs , f4 � ^ 11104,,04 a I u:d As r0 hick s a s Cr Sampler (signature) Supervisor (signature) c4N1 Container -52 oz. $ 1M 14 rr2 POI 3 - YD,. L VOA )6az alrss 7-I '' Itr 4.es 2-32oz (.5 Preservation/Amount .IC re s ) 0 12O`C) N .1 HcL 2•mL 51)% ,isoy 0r1. tab ,Ih5cy no p..S I 0 pct 10 . L tot xM5vy Date 3/27142 Oate Golder Associates Inc. 9 106 SAMPLE INTEGRITY DATA SHEET Plant/Site n C.Aip (turn Lw,dGct` Site Location cAl .e 'CleeerCe en Sampling Location (Cldcv..-.a..aTa2 Maveriw•�.C. Project No. 9i3.2Jo 7 Sample ID Cec r s -f C.)tu / aiu4J - / Date Time / c's Technical Procedure Reference(s) Type of Sampler Ter.eA.. 8Atce' Y117/47 Media Station "A -- Sample Type: .rap time composite space composite Sample Acquisition Measurements (depth, volume of static well water and purged water, etc.) -r4.or. OeYnk r. 30.3 VoIJ✓_- 12 3 cal. 'u J ' .. S Sample Description 'x -f,3 s<'1y. Jsli �J Field Measurements on Sample (pH, conductivity, etc.) pal = "Pig r.Yb 2. S7 Kcox> 654°F Aliquot Amount I•I;1.- Container 2-�r,<, LPG,: Preservation/Amount Sampler (signature) Supervisor (signature) K Date 77/ Date .1r,' Golder Associates Inc. 321061 SAMPLE INTEGRITY DATA SHEET Plant/Site Clan At• Wee, Ca,.+ry Site Location Sw or 6,243 Co Sampling Location 4mc4z Project No. Sample ID Gr-)MW 2. Technical Procedure Reference(s) Type of Sampler Ss•I-r Date 5/2747 Media 44^2 Sample Type: Time )C -3O Station time composite space composte Sample Acquisi;ion ,measurements (depth, volume of static well water and purged water, etc.) pA'y( r.A4V Sample Description pale h.._,•. (:`„ Field Measurements on Sample (pH, conductivity, etc.) Ss.4er 0-4, 3 c -/T X7cbo pH 711 Aliquot Amount CMTIChMS aQG.we es ilLTes ter d A..., a:.t) Alt ‘.1 PPS Yr 4 R,4oLo.-A,44, ais w.(.es�Cwt Container 32 ca y�l� 1la oz pG5 3- V0A 16oz 511.x, 1b nZ Q77)5 1• I t,'tt, 5t.sy I'W 5/ACe _ "? �. X202 0(_ J Preservation/Amount *to r' 10 ht. 2o% ilitresf N C� 2.eL =4'%aa9 ID)44 2U°w KA)SJ.( N4 Jas rrt•-1 l0 i_ 20% )4ATiy Sampler (signature) r 4i Supervisor (signature) /1/1/, Date 4/77�rz Date Golder Associates Inc. 93106'! SAMPLE INTEGRITY DATA SHEET Plant/Site r'u .rt. Wart A4_nr LAVP Project No. q(3 -7'W3 Site Location SG,1Qk C-¢ee2ay, CD Sample 10 �GL`M41 Sampling Location Cn w.,Q,4er /Ih.(lon r l( 4%)/14(.0 - Technical Procedure Reference(s) Type of Sampler TEcc�+� f;A+t4t Date ___ 4 /17/47 Tine Moo Media (FrAn. Station Sample Type: ra. time composite space composite Sample Acquis;tion Measurements (depth, volume of static well water and pursed water, etc.) b,4 14'K.= n2, 1Gi (rrll,_ • ; 1.01 ca ( ( luny4 !, = 3.0 oa 1 Sample Description 5c1 VrQr cc:io J Field Measurements on Sample (pH, conductivity, etc.) 44-: 7-70 rout _ 2.2'7 se rcec; 0,,, Las /— Aliquot Amount I- Icier Container 2-,0s4 dss (ro(!4-s Preservation/Amount AO Sampler (signature) Date _____Z42/7 . 7 Supervisor (signature) N�fa Date =` Golder Associates Inc. ,4 9:31.46:* • Date Media SAMPLE INTEGRITY DATA SHEET Plant/Site C (Inc G.,.rry LA..ocits- Site Location S4 -F 6,a5 CO Sampling Location 6c.Ww+ u3 Project No. le3.2Ya3 Sample ID Ae,\A"a3 Technical Procedure Reference(s) Type of Sampler s5 'L.% 2.5197 Sample Type; y; au time composite space compos:te Sample Acquisition Measurements (depth, volume of static well water and purged water, etc.) pnrd 4.44o 1I) 2. 41}r f Time Cgrzff Station Sample Description fit brai. /g.,:N Field Measurements on Sample (pH, conductivity, etc.) sa. Y° Co..,i G. 35 xrgpo off 7.s Aliquot Amount Container `RT�c s 44i.w,c S &ten N /Irry..• as A) ACSrr, e ors l Het s,e.,,, c Preservation/ Amount get 4a.,.t_ VIAHo (GD,, 3Lu 7 .,1 4P/. HAS0I It r7 P°3 )01.1 2)711(NSQ.j 2 - j 7i,4r)a cF s lO 1 76'41 r-mgcy 2 -,;zip,(` , Sampler (signature) ( - Supervisor (signature) /01 Date -4117s/v7 Date ?' Golder Associates Inc. 9'3106'! Date Media SAMPLE INTEGRITY DATA SHEET Plant/Site Site Location i'FM a� G.k2A Sampling Location GG3Mt.1 q Project No. Sample ID 913-2Y0? GOMw y Technical Procedure References) fep Type of Sampler 5/24A? Sample Type: Time OQSS— Station time composite space composite Sample Acquisition Measurements (depth, volume of static weft water and purged water, etc.) ..,Add -4 ?,O w� I (- ✓ purc1 Sample Description i..t+ acres„ s, /4% ),< 4 h Field Measurements on Sample (pH, conductivity, etc.) 4e- 51.3 °F !'� 1 R '; k Joao y,,.kade Aliquot Amount AA.,a„t Container 3Za:. ['OS G+„00 ) 4 O74 fat Mean( c /V•iitA 4 A-...4 J. A/ META{ OrSSa..0 Pr C, Dl, J He'te3ir,->t,} M1 Rhone: r. nr e. 3-WrL Coo 1 cZ acs ICn2Fa 2- 1 l:4.ribss 2-32.7 Preservation/Amount at. S 1 O M t_ 20?o fIA 1 Flu_ 2 4 s7P1r% IO,L 20`4".. N4S-1. ea forts Sampler (signature)__C: Supervisor (signature) 4," Date 6 Date en.' Golder Associates Inc 931064 SAMPLE INTEGRITY DATA SHEET Plant/Site Ce."Ry'C irf610 tv L.4,30e,•• •• Site Location Q.J .4 6-rssGa CO Sampling Location GGJMOS Project No. Sample ID 9'3.2103 tCJ/Nc.?S Technical Procedure Reference(s) Type of Sampler <5 kat,. Date= t Time Media th';t'- Station Sample Type: qra time composite space composite Sample Acquisition Measurements (depth, volume of static well water and pureed water, etc.) (ryrl r oar 5 Wye/ J r3!S Sample Description u•r- eG V Field Measurements on Sample (pH, conductivity. etc.) c,n SD.D °F ca.A 7•0Sxrcw (Al Aliquot Amount Ap.'a..5 r nefAvics 1b,ton R, . 42 log Mrr.t t t:34,,...) Woe&t .acs Container 4? pr; Itiaz°� yam f Nom IL,,, A)j) 2- f Lair txs Pt, rs 2.32. I Preservation/ Amount NO p s 4e gees Het 2.Lsz10.5aI ec-7NS d rrr- �0 p- -/O -t 2070 112 6),/ i Sampler (signature) Supervisor (signature) Date Date Golder Associates Inc. 931064! SAMPLE INTEGRITY DATA SHEET Plant/Site Or -put CJe+7 ta...,'c Zane Sr ) er &Jt (4. . CV Sampling Location r^cw Site Location Project No. Sample ID Gc„/t+w.SA Technical Procedure References) of Sampler SS SA,s,e Date -;7>,-42 Ti - e tZot, Media G.s4fr Station Sample Type: grab time composite space composite Sample Acquisition Measurements (depth, volume of static well water and pureed water, etc.) eke c er el.. !, 0 1.1,/ Sample Description 7Pr- l /r ba 4,,.•;J J Field Measurements on Sample (pH, conductivity, etc.) St °T co -d 5.4a r/eco PH 710 Aliquot Amount ANIQ,J< C.�ttws vV? eh -4,6o nn�S, /LSnaoI.3 Container 72 2-a 3- k'ar~ v A )4.02 14117 16 oz� 2- I Her eq4ee Preservation/Amount AO No d'•d. hi G! 2m I SaS 1144 y`!''" c /•n��vWCCIQLS 3? ,r r' Sampler (signature) Supervisor (signature) �9 I - Date 2cZ /6 r Date Golder Associates Inc. 92106_*, SAMPLE INTEGRITY DATA SHEET Plant/Site t :nnwc &%z!J /4. -Ts. /.ti„aroc Site Location 9,ui 6.05 Pc Sampling Location E¢M<,.SA Project No. 93:2yD1 Sample ID r4J.sc,jr4-O,p Technical Procedure Reference(s) Type of Sampler &z«'? Date '�r?oA7 Time _ Media C.A're'L Station Sample Type: rab time composite space composite Sample acquisition .Measurements (depth, volume of static well water and pureed water, etc.) 4" H fir 7\ . Isb,1 J /too Sample Description ,re -M {"A° pow.. L.4 y Field Measurements on Sample (pH, conductivity, etc.) fwd -S92 ?.rec PN 7.2o Aliquot Amount AM1� CerlaS cs Container - 32 v P6(. )67iF"JS '3- �•, f ,mu Ir,o2 ^lycr Sampler (signature) Supervisor (signature) (442 Preservation/Amount Pious no p —s H0_ '�. ( .Silo r(k , i`o orS NOA *c n. P^•S /0,•/ 7o7. Wispy Date Date • Golder Associates Inc. ,y 931061 SAMPLE INTEGRITY DATA SHEET Plant/Site ( L2447,r#C Uiko 4 . r L 0744. Site Location veil ettte 7fr- CD Sampling Location 6Cn1/NW e Project No. Sample ID 9/3.2.0 Technical Procedure Reference(s) Type of Sampler SS B4rilE.p Date_ 3/7x/47 Time _6Zd Media &P*t7t_ Station Sample Type: rap time composite space composite Sample Acquisition Measurements (depth, volume of static well water and purged water, etc.) 04.2. vr6-0 Cf T7 a / Sample Description I.L.f Field Measurements on Sample (pH, conductivity, etc.) 4 —e 51.3 °F" re —r( 5.66 xequ.Q pH 7.3Z Aliquot Amount "a -s �r4t'�vr� ORr *Ks ni.5 Q'sottp 1Crc rox3 /ilc+cg t .A^t Container .T fot t4oz SG.$ oz -4,a3 2- I h(..1 1/.,as 2-32.ca. t Preservation/Amount 'Pei (Owl 2070 H''py Ha 2,r / sc% y =y 10,4,t L zc47O M4.5-‘,1 •y Nr7 Itt S 10-6 701g, WS()y Sampler (signature) 1 Supervisor (signature) 409 Date ?fh/•7-- Date Golder Associates Inc 931.06'" SAMPLE INTEGRITY DATA SHEET Plant/Site (eat At (c.kv.d Cet.4-14 G.s.ora.,. Project No. Site Location 463 hor Corierc.-- l0 Sample ID C1;,W)W -< Sampling Location C / .a-rrc Akp.-ra2..e C" -)e,".- iA4cry Technical Procedure Reference(s) Type of Sampler /44(es7 a -Q Date y/2f/cZ- Media cif'Z Sample Type: Time Station N/A /32x1 time composite Sample Acquisition (Leasurements (depth, volume of static well water and purged water, etc.) dot) I ,ia41H., _ .D. o unto, = N.'tt ( Sample Dossc- pt on 4;r1,y I,•,L4 J J space composite field Measurements on Sample (pH, conductivity, etc.) PN : 7.6Z reel 7 Li S2 k l0X) &_e; Cs. A e P Aliquot Amount )- Lur Container -S /asp L Preservation/ Amount Sampler (signature) _‘, Supervisor (signature) Date.4—z Date }j.is' Golder Associates Inc. 9Y1.064 SAMPLE INTEGRITY DATA SHEET Plant/Site teeMr.r,.t j1s+Q 61:4r., g,c Site Location Sr, r/ L es-te.z e Sampling Location $LJM<A) Project No. Sample it) Q,3 2vo'; Technical Procedure Reference(s) Type of Sampler S5 RAtwe? Date Media 3/7c/c2 / r kit? Tine _ Station Sample Type: rao time composite space composite Sample Acquisition Measurements (depth, volume of static well water and purged water, etc.) ra ct-1 vo(...,< Seca / /.n r.i . 13.0 as J v r% v Sample Description G c+a;may tag,„ vef J r Field Measurements on Sample (pH, conductivity, etc.) 53.6 O( f !oral pH Aliquot Amount Al /7?6hr.c s fUer2..r 9 Awon,AM :.5 /V NewcDes rago Y6/Qz�c{[.s.3 ('tvta tC I'X! I�Auavrt• at klk 531 7.Y( taro Container 32 22 es ( lb cn. pc� 3- 'lO„c.~�(,bA Iho7 ttst o.;01.1 2— I I.1• 5r,,s. 2- 32= Pk Preservation/ Amount vror !Q ml, 70%, Hac. c SMSC1.f 10 .. L 20% NJ?l so ate( 10 cs Sampler (signature) Supervisor (signature) r N/ic Date 3A,,y/4_ Date Golder Associates Inc. 921 -OS' Date Media SAMPLE INTEGRITY DATA SHEET Plant; Site `.a,nXott,_ At a tie..+!} 64.,,,orr, et Site Location si , EEi-eo2r ,- o Sampling Location 4.4.)44c-1 R Project No. 9v3 7'lc7" Sample ID et --)4'4-27? Technical Procedure Reference(s) Type of Sampler is BaeGeZ -3Az_ 1/4re_ Sample Type: Time /lam Station time composite space composite Sample Acquisition Measurements (depth, volume of static well water and purged water, etc.) G.3s3,1 20 O I eta 5..3 vQ(we «f •J /- Sample Description Ue (v4 4r• J Field Measurements on Sample (pH, conductivity, etc.) V. 6 'r Co& 6.sg x , 42J -f 72! Aliquot Amount Amos -is G.rs be rAWAIT If as S Ai Alec, S^3Jrv1 AFDC !Oil el4A0NIICL01=S Container 32gz (f 16O2 340 n. l_ VCA II; 02 f c,$ 02 2.-1141.L.ts• 1.401tasi 2 32 oz Preservation/ Amount tU etas col. t 7a , RL 2y Het 2, -. ,-.LSD rar,s�f LQMj of �' 46)./ sots tnS 10 w. L 20S HAJ0j Sampler (signature) Supervisor (signature) s4 Date 1.40 7 Date '�" Golder Associates Inc. 4.1. 921.064 SAMPLE INTEGRITY DATA SHEET Plant/Site %r -,.r/2,41— C.Jcz� Ca 71r 441.4 ,•c Site Location 5.43 cr. (7t -" LD Sampling Location rz .2.. ervt- Mau. to.0"..)G, Project No. 9r3-2�lD3 Sample ID 1014.4—.4. rC.1,.ac-.)- Technical Procedure Reference(s) Type of Sampler 1-ir te^"... kt.-^L Date Media 4/27 /'c L) A tcrt, Sample Type: Time _ Station lv 4,7/9 - time composite space composite Sample Acquisition Measurements (depth, volume of static well water and purged water, etc.) -lo b l clpftc - Olt ras, v0iu-z - G.13ed I p J `e2 4 r, - -20 c a V ` J Sample Description 'u.ar(, J Field Measurements on Sample (pH, conductivity, etc.) IaH-7.39 (oAat 5771 k trio 622. ° Aliquot Amount I,lsr Container 2- G LC5 Ithtt(i, Preservation/Amount 140 ^Jr Sampler (signature) t1/- - Supervisor (signature) N/A7 Date Y,47�ri2- Date a Golder Associates Inc. - , 92106"! Supervisor (signature) SAMPLE INTEGRITY DATA SHEET Plant/Site , IC--TOAt f:,k+t Lok.o.Gv Project No. 9`.3"2'it3 Site Location Sc,2 cr Ca ( Gp Sampling Location Sample ID rie )M+W9 Technical Procedure Reference(s) Type of Sampler SS &4sce✓L Date 3/3'r/0 -Z Media f 'a Sample Type: T;ne _ Station time composite space composite Sample Acquisition Measurements (depth, volume of static well water and purged water, etc.) (rnL,. I ci J 2.1i sc.)) S.SD cal Sample Description ft.t i w -L c e ... S: lL I,- y, I t� 6 Field Measurements on Sample (pH, conductivity, etc.) 4°`'P 46.0 'r Cv 1� S.'3 m lacy Aliquot Amount K 400 I4Qt:�v.. t)51,L Ji11 p'��fS�c �u�c L. -41N /U„r Container it n2�( 1/7 16 07 S L,),• % oZ 2-1 khr)I I j.4er 1125.5 232oz.1 L J Preservation/Amount .HOOP no (x5 NGLr 24 YIUM N)rs Aor+S At,/S Sampler (signature) 6.57! //, Date Date ,%7. ..-T•Q Golder Associates Inc 921.06* SAMPLE INTEGRITY DATA SHEET Plant!Site r GKQppL (,.,Irto &t.wry L.R,.yrr.e._ Site Location _ &2a AqEE«h lO Sampling Location1MW /O Project No. 4r -?•/o3 Sample ID ee,1MhXO Technical Procedure Reference(s) Type of Sampler Sc & tr•4 Date _1/2c/4T Media w�L Sample Type: Time Station time composite space composite Sample Acquisition Measurements (depth, volume of static well water and purged water. etc.) Case voL • 2. �l 1 Sample Description IejL-ya3 „1_•J Field Measurements on Sample (pH, conductivity, etc.) T S -(7 7‘F co -J ‘-5-5-x repo u -7' Aliquot Amount V'�^M SS CA7Z:1‘1s (9/264A.94 ll4mstrd lrs.a..w.+ us A) Alm-prq asseturo cxroe3//A 4.tt.aes tet7to Nu..G,pt-c Container Sampler (signature)_`�.f� _'' Supervisor (signature) /1//%f (1014 Preservation/Amount tw •s 2.(s% Ry tow( 2ot0HD Airs I440,1 Date Date R.4' Golder Associates Inc. 9.2106* • SAMPLE INTEGRITY DATA SHEET Plant/Site /' 7%' 1'470 4M+e iefaignit, Site Location St J oP 6retbe CQ Sampling Location Geointe..1 0 Project No. 9/3-2yp% Sample ID/9-J4/44)// Technical Procedure Reference(s) Type of Sampler ProeoctK 4_..o Date 3/7-67‘7 Time /o -o Media wn'Tt'2-- Station Sample Type: qra time composite space composite Sample Acquisition .Measurements (depth, volume of static well water and purged water. etc.) ratan w 7 7 Ga f a y_ J Sample Description 'c1. J ,.a Field Measurements on Sample (pH, conductivity, etc.) 53 °F r Cerq PK 6.41 )e (coo Ali9uot Amount /44movc Carna4 offlaisiteS /VrrilebtE #Ai...tb..rwJ'S JU litMitt5, a Saktkil • TG78/r rap Container Preservation/Amount '5202 F'o kt•'Q"`S k X5 f00,1, 102:, FINS)Y '-i-40r.t. VCA HCI 1ZC2 4Ins_ 2t al___ j(,ozp( )Or.I.-20% OSY MtQfO/V?Ga .d.5 2-320z ri (Oft L2ectoWsiav Sampler (signature) [ f Date _ 2 Supervisor (signature) A/!f Date d•L` Golder Associates Inc. 931.064 SAMPLE INTEGRITY DATA SHEET Plant/Site C'M-tsmL 4AM Coven (-„� ac, Site Location <Cl+F Carmel ea Sampling Location Ge..JM6.-)'Z Project No, 4r3.2-ro3 Sample ID 6'J Mt_ ) l2 Technical Procedure References) Type of Sampler Q�[tt2 Date 7/3/��? Media Sample Type: space composite Sample Acquisition Measurements (depth, volume of static well water and purged water, etc.) O5 vo(0-..e_ G. ys J JJUr,.fQ-u It( OGd1 vJ i Time /2OO Station time composite Sample Description J Field Measurements on Sample (pH, conductivity, etc.) '10 St' 2°F CD --A ≤4o xtaco pit -LIS Aliquot Amount QRt sL, t es fritAV �vnAr-xsv ash 5. 17l ssowhw tt:s Pe4e0tW+vci..or.> Container 32 oz Ivok leoat. f; Sampler (signature) Supervisor (signature) '1ori.c. OA Preservation/Amount nc c. 11C( 2'—c$bI7 guc s. vop c Ito p --S io "4, 2ot goo5i) J Date Date =L' Golder Associates Inc 921061 • Plant/Site SAMPLE INTEGRITY DATA SHEET _Cesar._ Site Location <[J.; Greaten y Co Sampling Location 444444-J17-5 Project No. Sample ID 4f3.>403 Technical Procedure References) Type of Sampler utfetosTtrt. Date '5,25<Z Time _ /4c/5 — Media Lj.rrz✓. S.ation Sample Type: ao time composite Sample Acquisition Measurements (depth, volume of static well water and purged water, etc.) Casry veJ(v-...c 9.43511 pone n 2%_0cal a space composite Sample Description 1,y.11- Yi'0.„r.:sts6rA3 Field Measurements on Sample (pH, conductivity, etc.) s7.7 'F t s.,L_ 4.45 x tonic Aliquot Amount _Amok- 5 &mow. w as IEsTr. i45/l-lto Au'," "Attopoor a.) Container 32 oz,opL a2. 3-%40 1S (ess ISoa 2- I(� k �y/oz. J �4 Pt Preservation/ Amount re5 )nia.2o% Hum Sampler (signature) Supervisor (signature) 400 Date 3/202 — Date Golder Associates Inc. 92106f. e,v1rr'L SAMPLE INTEGRITY DATA SHEET Plant/Site Cs..Tn iskeze 12a n. Lrl.ar.` Site Location 41./"(ncne'r CO Sampling Location C,cJr4y.) lc" Project No. Sample ID 413-2.433 Technical Procedure Reference(s) Type of Sampler CS"- eArct^C. Date 3/70 Media S'ation Time I 42O Sample Type: time composite p space composite Sample Acquisition Measurements (depth, volume of static well water and purged water, etc.) cal, vnLw... S.4 ja1 9o.•+• a 71 c. 3 ( Os J Sample Description In J4+ Qr•L� l•<,:d J c Field Measurements on Sample (pH, conductivity, etc.) ss' G Y.,g Ne COOP +.Ptbs/� (ft ].SC, Aliquot Amount pinta S OfkAucc n) VP%4 /mow 1s tV ltt«•; Irsssti Container -32 14 0 it r-tc IG (a �_ to ss/ 3- `{o A.4 OA- NtL Preservations Amount te, 02i 64 k, 2cP4,4tay - n,.s -3zQz, lO,42cf?, gr -I Sampler (signature).ar—s Date a Supervisor (signature) 47,/t Date Golder Associates Inc. 4 SAMPLE INTEGRITY DATA SHEET Plant/Site Cie:Am r LJaz, .t. -9Ree Site Location </..? c/r ate,. Co Sampling Location 6/711.96art "w„42.ved4 C.) L &A44O (t/ Project No. Sample ID Yi3•2Yo'5 t��4JA4w't'/ Technical Procedure Reference(s) Type of Sampler WKo/2o5rity Date _ Media G.tPr• a2^ Time I400 Station Al�� Sample Type! .r . time composite space composite Sample Acquisition Measurements (depth, volume of static well water and purged water, etc.) kohl ,4g; F.o.o' tajwc. = ¶ 1) c pi y t 'VS 41 1 V J Sample Description !aLt a _ Si. 4f(, S•'!f �J J c) Field Measurements on Sample (p1l, conductivity, etc.) pig = GYo re,4 4,s3 two $3.3 r - Aliquot Amount I- I, ks Container 2- a/e,cs avt(tp V Preservation/ Amount Sampler (signature) Supervisor (signature) /I��/7 Date 41,41/4Z - Date .=' Golder Associates Inc. 921061 ' SAMPLE INTEGRITY DATA SHEET Plant/Site fE.,.nrc &« ers—r. Ls-vac?.c Site Location SG1 40 4-- omits-arr, Co Sampling Location 'AAroG•cc.. (A,14.GRA.a) Project No. Sample (0 7'3.2.103 (� Ud Technical Procedure Reference(s) Type of Sampler Date _Zr7r 67 Time (Yaa Media G.•"-t.'L Station Sample Type: rag time composite space composite Sample Acquisition Measurements (depth, volume of static well water and purged water, etc.) Sample Description rIP+r Field Measurements on Sample (pH, conductivity, etc.) Aliquot Amount Anon, C,ettas Q7Aa,k S tk.a,.* 34, A) IherMs Tort_ /C AOOw/4Ct_100 Container 320zeo (40? 13-140A- 16ot c fa.c 14 oz 2- I ta6 _ 2- 32 pQb Preservation/Amount ON i p1 L b`r:. P41934 3/ H61 2t•Ac. 4O/ 10v, c Teta Wskay 104.( u& Sampler (signature) Date —_Sr7 Supervisor (signature) 41Af Date Golder Associates Inc 931.06:: SAMPLE INTEGRITY DATA SHEET Plant/Site /F-vrl1.+c- 42erso &G'47V Site Location 44) aCatet Sampling Location Project No. 9'3 2 o3 Sample ID J. a+o Technical Procedure Reference(s) Type of Sampler USA Date h/72747 Time /4 30 Media Station Sample Type: .rra time composite space composite Sample Acquisition Measurements (depth, volume of static well water and pureed water, etc.) w /A Sample Description t%ou- ro ,, sr>a...c � V Field Measurements on Sample (pH, conductivity, etc.) Aliquot Amount 1• /. ^kcr Container 2-c /MS 4 tics Preservation/Amount Sampler (signature) Supervisor (signature) Date Date %'" Golder Associates Inc. 931061 e Date Media SAMPLE INTEGRITY DATA SHEET Plant/Site a.....ritott Vc o a -7f iry Project No. 9,3 ?S'a3 Site Location 4.e.)e, G+ecreze, Co Sample ID 11%- Asotre Sampling LocationatFfcKrceer ," Ar rns[rr 4t0.a v „a' Saar', Technical Procedure References) Type of Sampler -3i17/sz- Sample Type: h1Ttt_ Time J2/ f Station time composite space composite Sample Acquisition Measurements (depth, volume of static well water and purged water, etc.) Sample Description Field Measurements on Sample (pH, conductivity, etc.) Aliquot Amount Avic4iS Container Cemiutes 3. tie VOA toVvert ✓% -racc ILL ltieJS v6rc'rn 1/.4rx D_.&c tots A) (bc 9Lc% Jb o'L 2- (I' � 11,ir3)3st 2-32n> Sampler (signature) x' Date .Y Supervisor (signature) /y/J1 Preservation/Amount ea. r,5 fonatalifA , h MCA 24, LS:go Niel) lnr•L 2*HJ' IN) piss< 10mq. 2d'. N. y Date ay.' Golder Associates Inc. 921061 SAMPLE INTEGRITY DATA SHEET Plant/Site lerar Cl &-.w 4 C 'c. Site Locationa)eit6eruzc-r. Ca Sampling Location £t-rr- 0%) 4-o Swxb r - Project No. Sample ID RP- Jtjw7 Technical Procedure Reference(s) Type of Sampler Date —3407 / Media Layrilr? Sample Type: 3/2-7/sta` Time /g,i /330 Station time composite space composite Sample Acquisition Measurements (depth, volume of static well water and purged water, etc.) Sample Description '4r 1 4 � 4 ..vy,.,z .. s* a Field Measurements on Sample (pH, conductivity, etc.) Aliquot Amount Jl2E,hwc4 ifit772orC tr Aren't rcpt _„ 175Tta t r1 A43 Al Sampler (signature) Container l6oz 3- lin Supervisor (signature) Preservation/Amount tilopeS 1Q, 21(O44•0501 RCL 2:..cgrit y )o,,.t. 20'., RA15)y Ayes " (Op427&#tlS4 Date Date Golder Associates Inc 93106. SAMPLE INTEGRITY DATA SHEET Plant/Site 7)--.rn..c L.Jaao L..M AVICS Site Location <O0r 6Qesee^+ Co Sampling Location !a,1f:.4 orreezez Technical Procedure Reference(s) Type of Sampler tv/A Date Y/27A7 Project No. Sample lb 7'3 -lv03 224 war 4/L6-7— A oe Ira geonar...m'vc) fhb Media Station Sample Type: •rab time composite space composite Sample Acquisition Measurements (depth, volume of static well water and purged water, etc.) Time /S va cwR111.— Sample Description egeldr. SGT•_ Ord, d.� Field Measurements on Sample (pH, conductivity. etc.) YLA Aliquot Amount Container cs X4.5 Preservation/Amount Sampler (signature) Date 4'/72 Supervisor (signature) /Of Date _-� Golder Associates Inc. 93146* SAMPLE INTEGRITY DATA SHEET Plant/Site �� ft CArke Site Location ZC 6a3l..r CO Sampling Location TRAP GLA.4C Project No. Sample ID 913.23 TC3 Technical Procedure Reference(s) Type of Sampler Date L^(3 Si PP( 'e0 Tine Media f_te2 Station Sample Type: gran time composite P space composite Sample Acquisition Measurements (depth, volume of static well water and purged water, etc.) Sample Description LAO eQAtZte -cQ•p C,iy Field Measurements on Sample (pH, conductivity, etc.) Aliquot Amount (1Qf✓Ml,[ � Container Preservations Amount 1- (^{J,,,.L VOA - Sampler (signature) /7,0c4 Date 7/f17 Supervisor (signature) /Via Date Golder Associates Inc. 9:31.061_ ' Site Location Sampling Location SAMPLE (NTEGRIIY DATA SHEET Plant/Site £c..ricPc- <MA 441-ogu.. 9'3,2Vo Stone --1 8& iz Project No. Sample t0 tei Technical Procedure Reference(s) Type of Sampler <S S#rce-7 Date 72242 Time /620 Media l.✓A'>� Sample Type: Station time composite space composite Sample Acquisition Measurements (depth, volume of static well water and purged water, eta) Sample Description 1..)3 Cam/•+d oF.w.r..! 4.a Sir Field Measurements on Sample (pH, conductivity, etc.) Aliquot �nAmount Ct r02 -1S n26m.J,t s hrrIf )46.0.n.4-�«)46.0.n.4-J s rA) Pt-re e.a[S keeMici FAQo xlca, datze Container 32 az et oz 3 -yo uor4 I6oz` ? ,s 14 o -z. poL '2- 1 I, }v 3Lcs I: {v <Inc J 32oz. P0( Preservation/Amount nort (o .�'2ot f+ war Zw� may )onot 2ctt.,MAW/ itopn S twp.. s< OA. 20°C-14004 Sampler (signature)4 Supervisor (signature) y/fi Oate Date ors' Golder Associates Inc. 921.06" SAMPLE INTEGRITY DATA SHEET Plant/Site Uwr?ilc £ &zo A.'isr G +4,o, Site Location {1anev CO Sampling Location .rr'a.-rtr gLaohY Project No. Sample ID Technical Procedure Reference(s) Type of Sampler Nlp. Date _L// c1.cz Time Media L./An-2— Station Sample Type: (?c time composite space composite Sample Acquisition Measurements (depth, volume of static well water and purged water, etc.) Nor Sample Description rL4� Field Measurements on Sample (pH, conductivity, etc.) Aliquot Amount 1- G Lr Container Preservation/ Amount tL NoK Sampler (signature) ( CS: Supervisor (signature) Date Y/Jg142. Date .` Golder Associates Inc. 931061 e.x 'Y 4� t dv APPEND GRAIN' SIZE DISTRIBUTION CURVES AND :: COMPACTION TEST RESULTS Z O I Co I- U) 0 w N Q CC P T O O O O O O O O O O O O 01 CO N (0 U) I a CUwZ• u. -Z W C AY .� W —Ort- O O 0 O 0 O a C -J J O Z 0 O O O a m 2 8 a 1 — z z 0 gal s Laga w<U -wX W iO wtz0 �2u D z a m °-J S U x GOLDER ASSOCIATES 931.061 e GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION H nP F a O O O O O O 0 O 0 0 0 O 01 CO N o a') o £1 01 QUJQWZFs la.—zW2 mr •31++—Oxh- O O O NJ z O O O 5 z 8 0 O N � W u fluff Oa W o x of e� wH020 0OJ CO < W - 2 J W z m 0. 8 V= 0 F N N C C a V 2 S I - U Z GOLDER ASSOCIATES 2:31061. , z O F- w N O7 cc 0 w N co w 0 � • R co � I r✓ O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 01 CO Ns UL) V r) N d w CC W ZF- LL—ZUJ m} 3w—(jih O 0 0 O 0 O O O a a r w a 0I z z 8 O J Q Oa z wtli �o avow < w © a ¢ O aR I W GOLDER ASSOCIATES INC. 9210641 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION zcP 4 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O rn CO N. (.0 a) v n a awzc.)W Z. W—zwa mr ;W—CC2r- 0 0 0 0 O 0 a a 1 I LJ CS K 0 L. it ill i-: z 0 0 cw r U 6 Y -C) — (2, Lit a -1 a 6 a O E pro' a -J Cel a dN N I C GOLDER ASSOCIATES INC. 921061 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION Cl I 0- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o rn 0 n o ,n a ro a ,- „ a UMOW 2F w-zwm m> 0 0 0 0 0 r y w i J Z w ON r2 O 0 0 0 0 i J 3 n G c 0 E 8d a 8 - wt O<c _3m A J J M U 8 c 4 a flEt1AME: 2403411. V I GOLDER ASSOCIATES INC. 93106" C) H U 'ON1 S31VIOO• EI3©ioc I am v f O m 2 2 G) i 6) J • 9rrz--n lzmoxm- N (01 A SA Cr) V 0) SO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O The 61 NOIlf18Il31SI0 3ZIS N1VEM 'ONI S81VIOO. naioo I "s C) C) r r 0) 0> b 0 z 0 O r CO Tri�7 c C 00>m m O n m m RI C C Z .y 71 5-1rQn5 iw O = r- N 8 8 0 y2 P N ss r 4 4 r o w O O J O O O O O O =C) — r - -cw 71 mz—„ — z m 0 A m -v N W A (1i 0) V p t0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 s. Oar SIM s. d NOIlfl8IIj1SIa 3ZIS NIVBD 9'1.061 • N 8 b5 r � fir m = O < m c �i h o m O m O O 2 . 4 !! C) 0 c m O O 0 J O O J O O O —iiO —mom{. -C co rrn2—T — zmf zmt J -+ N W 4 cc CA V CO 00 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C [ [ NOI1f SIbl1SIa 3ZIS NIVEID 93].46:" s 'ON1 SaLVIOO01N a2a1OD O r •••I r r v O 2 Z n pr m niMP m i C A = r •`- w O r a 8 r �� O 2 z C m F, i J 0 0 0 C)) 2 m0 m 2 r C rn m CO co O O O b 0 N szO —m* K= 'mz—m-azmc'»mv NU A UM V O 0 0 O O' O O O O O O O O O r _ a L/ D z NCa Q) N • z v 0 C 6i) 0 m m m c co s O z xr I 9310654 ;l O r O m 1 z N co n a m CO C, 2 H 0 co CO D 2 O C- xnr g 2 _ C m O n≥m 0 oz -4m?? tin 9 0 • a c z N 2E o C) 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 1 0 0 O J 1SL�-m� {m zmz-m Hzmczmro N w A pi m W (0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 NO11f1811±1SIO JZIS NIVHO • I w P e V U, C) n r r ID Co w r Ct 2 C Qrn m p 9 C m In m 1 • I" m O 0 O -4S .n -m* Km mmz-T 1zm(iymro N W A 01 CI) V @ c0 O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 D t z n U c a N Itsz o 0 ` m m � N 4 $ O z iO6" to Z 0 H N GO ° w CC z O � R W =' N '^ v! N C▪ C 5 _ r a am O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0) CO N tfl I r) fV n.w2Qwz)— w—zw[r m} '3W—OZI' O 0 0 0 0 m g d a J N r i th 2 2 8 z O _ 2UU N 0 8 E co H J a N CV J N J v 0 a. �IC 2 I GOLDER ASSOCIATES INC 931.061. . GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION L O O O O O O O O O O O O 61 CO N (D N C M C r 4 w CCUw Zw- zw} - i- 0 O O O 0 w W 3 z z O w 0 U I U> n rf M PATE: 93106$ GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION Y e z s 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o rn CO N. (0 U) t r') (4 0. W CUwZF• LL-ZW lC m} 3W-f7SF- O O O O O O O O IN MILLIME a ala Ca CC U 4 z 8 Q ogN J a s it r U 68 O 7 Cr VO W Z 0.-' O z O • J 0 O 0. to a • N J oR FILE NAME: 24e)S3I I Yi l GOLDER ASSOCIATES INC. 93t06:! z CD 8 NO3 ro- . - W z Co d- o: e W Z N W 7 7 �I Q a CD : A M1 r 0 O O 0 0 IN MILLIMETERS ONJ rz 0 r O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 O 01 c0 n (.0 In Q ii N 1 W CC Z_ LL—zw 0)- .; W —V $F- W W 8 41 a U H G. Z 8 C) V N W O c 0 s 4 a 4 8 (14 I GOLDER ASSOCIATES INC. 93106'! z O a h- m cn O W _N CO Z Q CC V . 5 N 5 w i O Z m O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O ci CO N O U) t M) (Ni ✓ 0.WCV WZH u---2WCL Oi)- 3.W-(NSF O O 0 O 0 O 0) N u 3 3 2 N a a C, V 0 co r CZ a U Z (D J S O Z 0 d U N W _ 0. <O a - J J I s� Wy< GOL.DER ASSOCIATES INC. 91061 • S Z O a P w N M CO W I -I- O $ • a W E N Z v CIE Q a a a -------------------- 1. O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0) W (0 in C r') N r 0.WOUWZF- W—ZW2 ID} .3W —OZ. r 0 0 0 O O 0 s m a 2 UR a 0 I NNW 931061 ' z O P r03 wcn 's0 o og W Z.0 _N 6-< CA m Q CC C air O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O rn CO N D ;n c rl a a W Z Q W Z e U. - z W 2 a7 } O O O O O 0 O a J I a z 8 v G dlQzo G WF^UW W m < W- H 6 Z x = W a. V tL 0 z 0 M a w C a. J J O e C s GOLDER ASSOCIATES INC. 921061 Z O s W CO 4" - TWT ❑ c W t R N W Z '¢ V 3 N d� e O O O O 0 O� r I San S sib s SSS sh • O r O O O O O O O O O O O O O o rn CO n CO in a 11 a W MU W ZH u. -Z W s W> w-OxF- 92 I t z 8 J a J J " N 5 - ri 3 I N w U z U M Q U O f!) cc W ❑ J ca 32106' z O D N1 I- F V/ Q w N u) z_ CD 0 ] 1-02" e 1Y iir L!' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 O 01 CO N co N G W 2oW ZF IL—ZW2 0 0 0 a a 3 a8 Iv Ct C- 0 N A 5 0 „2 z0 e to Cs &WV_- as w r U w < IL M0.430 La m 0 L44 5 z ,z V CC O GOLDER ASSOCIATES INC. 93106'11 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION I I I I I O a r O O O O O O O O O O Cr) ¢7 N (0 in 4 M N e CL wCCU W ZI- LL-ZwC CG>• '3w-CWI- a O O f- 0 w O O 0 a a 0 0 V C- 8 F U 2 H 0 c 0 c' 2 m J N J W U w alp is -t n lw 12 GOLDER ASSOCIATES INC 93106" O O O 2 8 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION N w ^1 W e 0 Q R I O O O O O O O O O O O O 01 CO N c0 to 7 t7 N 1— w cC uJ 2H w-2wZ cDY - w —OZ. O en UI w J J_ 2 N Oto ;z O O m 8 u<WQwwy c,� a 0 ;. m J‘J CC N C O 8 w O N co O E .2 m 1 GOLDER ASSOCIATES INC 93106ft I I C) O C m D a m cn Z c) m O P ¶0 0, m CO C) -i 2 0 M I, T A T A fi J 0 O w 0 O S O 0 O - IxO-p mz --n -4 Ill O SI ro w a cn m NI CO CO 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 J O 0 e' / z co N m 0 5 XI -a W C -i O z ft oom z— T -s z m O y m-0 • N (A a (P 0) V m t0 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'ONI S31VIGC W a3a1OE S C) n r ✓ N r K C> r- 5 CD a C 0 O m n ✓ 2 0 9 (71 O 0 0 0 0 J 0 0 0 J 0 D z cod) co N m Z �� o a 01 V' o < in cft N �..� O z •3106_ —120—m* -c W mm2— n-1$m02m� N w . cn m v m CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U' m .p r r S31t/IOO. }J3O1OO r r L C 2 f1r W =80 2 II$'ry� m m O m≥ m t 4 C E r r SILIISIO 3ZIS NIVaD / 92106' ' P -ONI S3IVIJOS U3O1OJ s m v C) Q r r w N N x F, C r N m r O O J r O b O -12:Oa111. <m 77m2 -T -izmfl mt N (.1 4 C4 07 V CD (D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O C Ii J -II z G) 11 C N CP 4 m o o (p o 7, T Cn E Q N C ' s p z gi • C) O r O m I I I ez V ID C) n 4r co 8 A O 0 a m L m 2g rro m 8 Z TV., -20K m OA—rm OZ+1mp 9 N co rn N O O 1 0 O b O N Cm xmz—r-zmcXm9 N) W A Qi C! V 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I If 1i c CO co at 2 O o 01 m ▪ CD r g N m NO11(1811:11.SIO 3ZIS NIVHO 331061 • C) �O 1 fik m a 'm^ V/ n M a r r CD O m CO C) 5 N CO Z a co aa I m 2 K w 0 S831311Ill1 W N1 3ZJS N t O O 0 a O 0 1 0 0 J 0 0 0 J N20 —mg. Km Mmz—m -Izmo:m- J -+ N (.4 A (T m v (b (DO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 J ! a 1 i I I .. p C CD z 2 O 0 r !/f m K m S N mca 8 Noanew1S1a 2ZIS NIVB9 • • 11064 • O r C Tm I I 5 -t r 0) N N m v fh a, a O s 5 a z 0 0 Cu to 2 L r c p p ci 0 w 2 2 0 C C ��C, O m z r m O O O O b O -cco 0m2—r-12mo=mt N W A N 01 J CO to O O O O O O O O O O O O Y cih NOIl BftLLSIG 3ZIS NIVYlC •IC1O6 ' • N m r p r v r y J I 5r I l QC E o 0 O O J O O rxormg, -co om2"n-12mnom-ti N W 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (11 N V W W O a J f 0 a z N m C W C H O z 3106 s YJ 0 m D co 63 5 m cc 9 s N e to V 8 r 1- V 0 -c m C C 1� a O O O O 0 a .-c=O-m* -cm Amz-m - ZmeXmro \) W A 01 01 V 0) 40 O O O O O O O O O O O O .- -- — 1I— r- - r. - — Iti- D Z co NN m O 7J W c 0 z 06t 81. s 0 81 I N CO N N Y a N N m C) r m m r O m mg co _- m - LO p i rng0 m AR.. -+.^P?? PA 8mN W r L) co c O O J O O O O �zC—mg -coo mmz—'n-+zmo71m-V • N W A (11 0) • 01 1.0 O O O O O O O O O O O O NMI, 1V- iMP- • 5) 33 D Z ca CD zm • 0 o • J1 F ' — en s p z caag • m ;, 4 O g N r `o M pr m a C m-r2o2 P P z m Pn P $ D r � o 8 r (pO� C c W A m a C m J 0 a z 0 m z rn O 0 O J 0 O -4 O -m* <m rmz--n-1zmoym'0 M W A (n m v 0 cp 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r' ! i I I I o� Y LT/ a cocr, - N • 2 m 0 oco (n Ca co N 0 'Inc', • COMPACTION TEST RESULTS FIGURE G-35 130 125 120 115 ~ u. 0 0 O105 a wF00260 9, 90 800 BOREHOLE NUMBER 1- GT 123 SHALLOW SAMPLE NUMBER 0.0"9'g 1 I : DEPTH OF SAMPLE �w AvEf)-IOO A ' I ' I I ' I i : , A; 1 TEST METHOD ASTM D698 • I . I I , i I . Ni \ \, \ max0b/cu ft) 1170 \ . yd 125 O.M.C.(%) some coarse t0 -• DESCRIPTION Sity CLAY with •.• fne sand — t1.0 - 19.3 (CL) w„ em w� (%) 30 ,-1 vio 06) 18 \ .‘ 1 (%) 2 p _.._--- -- — — —...._ - Cl .12.90 . X 2.70 -- iNa wt . • a j `8.5 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 WATER CONTENT. PERCENT 40 Date MARO-4 1992 Golder Associates Inc. Drawn MS Chocked KW Joe No 913-2403 Appro-ed WEN 92106"! COMPACTION TEST RESULTS FIGURE G-36 130 125 120 F 115 8 0 :110— p•. Q W 0 o io5 0 CL I_ S 100 F )- CC C 95 90 ' t BOREHOLE NUMBER GT-123 DEEP I I I , :: (\ SAMPLE NUMBER 25 1 i i t r l 7\ DEPTH OF SAMPLE. ' ' k ' V • TEST METHOD ASTM 0698 METHOD A • 1 k r' k . f '\ 108A yd maxUD/cu !t) O.M.O.(%) 180 tittle medium to .. DESCRIPTION Silty CLAY with fine sand (CL) - `, 12.9 \ ` w„ (%) - 202(CL) wL, (%) 44 ` W, (%) 18 I I,; I tr `._ I 26 — . . p<%) — — , _ - - _ t.- . 2.80 270 r i \ , 2eo - r I •� 1 • 1 1 a.t\Al , I • r \` a' r 1 t I r N 1\ . A 1 ' I I I I I , R.,. l ___ -- 85 - 1 \ \. 80 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 WATER CONTENT, PERCENT 40 Date MARCH 1992 Drown Golder Associates Inc. checked Approved CG No 9t3-2403 P3A1 'kb WEH 4 4 COMPACTION TEST RESULTS FIGURE G-37 130 125 120 115 r 8 1110 0 J 105 a H 2 y c O 95 9D 85 BO BOREHOLE NUMBER SAMPLE NUMBER 15`20' 1 DEPTH OF SAMPLE NETHCO A ' TEST METHOD ASTM 0698 \'\ 1 .. 11 yd rrout00/cu n) t160 a5 ., S O.M.C.(%) '1 coarse to fine SAND 06SCRIPnON Silty CLAY and 165 (CU 29 '• wi_ (%) - ‘ Wp (%) 14 \� �p (%) 15 - . :, �� 280 —/..--- 270 2.80 - - _- .� l ., 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 WATER CONTENT, PERCENT Date MARCM 1992 Golder Associates Inc. Drawn MS owes oft Job No 913-2403 WEN Approved +ra.'JV. COMPACTION TEST RESULTS FIGURE G-38 130 125 120 115 8 j�'_..__..._'_..-r.--- CJ_-____._. C a m D 105 Oh 100 s n 95 BOREHOLE NUMBER SG -24. $ SAMPLE NUMBER 17-23' DEPTH OP SAMPLE METHOD A 1. ,, 1 TEST MEnioo A871A 0698 makawcu n) 106.5 Yd 18.0 O.M.C.(%) trace medaan _ __ "___.. oEscra nON Sity CLAY with _. _ ___._____ _ to Me sand (CL) "\ 16.7 w„ (%> , 45 , r r \ .'• wp c%) 19 . . . ;\ 1 `, `` (%) 26 _... -.-- -----:`: -_._....__ ..._... '--'.._- ..------ -. �- _. �l 2.80 • /- 270 - 2.60 • - - - • 85 SO - - » - 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 WATER CONTENT. PERCENT 40 pate APRL 1992 Drawn CG Checked TT No. 913-2403 Golder Associates Inc. Approved WEH .lob 97_10 --0 4 1 1 a to 1 E y 1 Cw g U U 0.1 O < - a I I I I - z He T r 0.01 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 TIME (MINUTES) S.W.L. = 25.21 ft... (0.39 fr)21it2(3.16)(5.89 ft)1 B.O.S. = 31.10 ft. K_ 0.67 ft der = 0.39 ft. 8(5.89 1)(7.95 min) L = 5.89 T = 795 min. M = 3.16 0=0.67 ft. K -8.29x10' atilscc Golder ASSOC1ateS Denver, Colorado rme HVORSLEV RISING HEAD ANALYSIS 'MONITORING WELL GWMW-01 ourrr/ mar.cr WASTE MANAGEMENT OF COLORADO CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL worm o^m MAY 1992 ,,oe Pc 923-2403 tm ,yam se"'" N/A orc no./RCV..,a. MUD Al.c. NO. prgE no. H-1 93 1 K. a- U U E A K, 0.1 C ci }LI`_ 0.01 r, 0 Kl S.W.L. B.O.S. d,,=0.39ft. L = 4.85 T=2.91min. M - D=0.678. S.W.L. B.O.S. cliff =0.39ft. L=4.85 T = 7.16 M = D=0.67 2 = = 3.16 = = 3.16 15.15 ft. 20.0 ft. ft. 15.15 ft. 20.0 ft. ft. min. ft. 4 • 6 TIME: (MINUTES) 8 (039 fi)21n[2(3.16)(4.85 Kl 10 12 ft)) 0.67 ft 8(4.85 KI-2.61x10-3 (0.39 ft)21n(2(3.16)(4.85 ' ft)(2.91 min) cm/sec f)) 0.67 ft 8(4.85 ft)(7.16 mm) K,2 -1.06x10"3 cm/sec K(GeometricMean)-1.67x10'3 cm/sec Golder O Associates Denver, Colorado TITLE HVORSLEV RISING HEAD ANALYSIS MONITORING WELL GWMW-O2 aE+rivrtaccr WASTE MANAGEMENT CENTRAL WELD SAMTARY OF COLORADO LANDFILL,—I„u DRAW!, larE MAY 1992 14e 'a. 9Z3-2403 rost,l yc s2.4,- N/A two n6,REv..vo. „o (.:;ac Na, H-2 ESIDUAL HEAD (PT) 0.1 1 i "N 441INN\Nr III^\\\ IT N. _____L._.. a 5 S.W.L. = 25.0 ft. B.O.S. = 27.60 ft. den =0.39ft. L = 2.60 ft. T = 7.80 min. M = 3.16 D=0.67ft. 15 TIME (MINUTES) 20 (0.39 fr)sjn[2(3.16)(2.60 f)] %s 0.67 ft 8(2.60 ft)(7.80 min) K=1.52s10-3 cm/sec 25 Golder Assocates Denver, Colorado HVORSLEV RISING HEAD ANALYSIS MONITORING WELL GWMW-03 CUEWr/f oJCCT WASTE MANAGEMENT OF COLORADO CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL 0RA DA MAY 1992 I0° "0. 923-2603 sCx: N/A CNECKED J/K: 0MC ,C./ REV..b. WEH Fl 40. 921061 10 • • C 0.1 _ U C7 C z 0.01 _ 0 U �- T, me-- T, I�- IC, S.W.L. = 11.17 ft. B.O.S. = 20.00 ft. dor=0.39ft. L = 8.83 ft. T = 3.28 min. M*I3.16 D=0.67 ft. IC2 S.W.L. = 11.17 ft B.O.S. = 20.00 ft. dn=0.39ft. L=8.83 ft. T=4.00 min. M=3.16 D = 0.67 ft. , 4 6 8 10 TIME (MINUTES) (0.39 fr)21n(2(3.16)(8.83 ft)) 0.67 ft 8(8.83 ft)(3.28 sin) K1 -1.45x10-' cm/sec 0139 ft)21n( 2(3.16)(8.83 ft)) 0.67 ft C' 8(8.83 ft)(4.0 min) .c -1.19x10'; cm/sec X(GeometricMean)'1.33x10-3 cm/sec 12 Golder A.SSOS Denver, Colorado HVORSLEV RISING HEAD ANALYSIS MONITORING WELL GWMW-O4 CUENT/PROJECT WASTE MANAGEVIENY OF COLORADO CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL 0MMW rI0 ac REV1E42U WEN a2 KAY 1992 +a. 923-2403 SCALE" N/A Rl v0. IFLaJRC NO. 144 owe Nr;Red. N6. 921064 10. I I )O CYCLES I E 1 w o -C O "fit 0.1 E c z I T I 0.01- 0 2 4 S.W.L. = 20.45 ft. 6 8 TLME(MINUTES) (0.39 ft)21142(3.16)(4.85 10 12 14 ft)] B.O.S. = 25.30 ft. �0.67 ft deer� d, = 0.39 ft. 8(4.85 ft)(4.65 min) L=4.85 ft. T = 4.65 min. M = 3.16 D=0.67 ft. K -1.64x10-3 cm/sec Golder Associates Denver, Cabrado @ ..._ HVORSLEV RISING HEAD ANALYSIS MONITORING WELL GWMW-O5 cLEHT/Pffflket WASTE MANAGEMENT OF COLORADO CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL INur« wre MAY 1992 .+ae no. 9Z3..2403 ram SAC scxc N/A H.ot; sO./acv..O. rove) vva� ALE 40. -- ran H-5 931061 1� K, = 1 I r T. U �` E J 1 0.1 t C I I a I 4 z c I I 1 T= 4--T, ! I F ~ 0.01 0 2 K1 S.W.L. = 25.65 B.O.S. = 30.00 dot = 0.40 ft. L - 4.35 ft. T = 4.16 min. M=3.16 A = 0.69 ft. K2 S.W.L. = 25.65 B.O.S. = 30.00 d�=0.40ft. L=4.35 ft. T = 5.89 min. M = 3.16 A=0.69 ft. 4 ft. ft. ft. ft. 6 TIME (MLNUTES) Kt= K1_2.07x10"3 K2a1.46x10-3 K(GeometricMean)-1.74x10-3 (0.40.m21 8 10 ft)) 12 .m21(2(3.16)(4,35 0.69 ft 8(4.35 cm/see (0.40 ft)21n[2(3.16)(4.35 ft)(4.16 min) ft)i 0.69 ft 8(4.35 cm/sec ft)(5.89 min) cm/sec Golder Associates Denver, Colorado Trtu: a HVORSLEV MONITORING RISING HEAD WELL GWMW-05NS WENT/PROJECT WASTE MANAGEMENT OF COLORADO CENTRAL WELD SANTfARY LANDFILL °Riots w.r MAY 1992 14°8 ilia 973-2403 _ 'sc u. N/A )..»c mliREV. MO. int- ,o. ;: u,RE „o. 146 RESIDUAL HBAD (RI) K, 0.1 0.01 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1j TIME (MINUTES) K, S.W.L. = 5.65 ft. B.O.S. = 30.00 ft. d,R = 0.17 ft. L = 20.00 ft. T = 5.11 min. M = 3.16 D =0.60 ft. K2 S.W.L. = 5.65 ft. B.O.S. = 30.00 ft. d.R=0.17ft. L = 20.00 ft. T = 0.77 min. M = 3.16 D=0.60 ft. (0.17 ft)2In(2(3.16)(20.0 ft)) K- 0.60 ft 1 8(20.0 ft)(5.11 min) K1-9.61x10"f cm/sec (0.17 ft)21n[ 2(3.16)(20.0 ft)1 K2- 0.60 ft 8(20.0 6)(0.77 min) K2.6.4xIO-4 cm/sec K(Geo»utricbfean)-23x10'` cm/sec Cr O C) C7 O 4 Golder Associates Denver. Cdorado CLIENT/PROJECT WASTE MANAGEMENT OF COLORADO CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL MIL HVORSLEV RISING HEAD ANALYSIS MONITORING WELL GWMW-06 0RAWN T�E+7t� .JAC amen wet i°ArE MAY 1992 N/A 92i-2403. 1st... aw�NSjREv. w IFItE vo. Gage Na. H-7 93106:1 10 RESIDUAL Ii K, K, 0.1 0.01 r 0 1 2 K1 S.W.L. = 6.45 ft. B.O.S. = 23.0 ft. d,,,=0.17ft. L = 10.0 ft. T = 2.76 min. M = 3.16 D=0.60 ft. K2 S.W.L. = 6.45 ft. B.O.S. = 23.0 ft. d,R=0.17ft. L = 10.0 ft. T = 3.41 min. M = 3.16 D=0.60 ft. j 4 5 6 TIME (MINUTES) 7 8 (0.17 ft)~in(2(3.16)(10.0 ft)] K l 0.60 ft 8(10.0 ft)(2.76 min) K1 -3.10x10-` cm/sec (0.17 A214 2(3.16)(10.0 ft)) K2' 0.60 ft 8(10.0 ft)(3.41 min) K2-2.51210' cm/sec %(Geomez icMean)-2.79x10' cm/sec ATURAL LOG CYCLES Golder Associates Denver, Colorado cs.wripmgccr WASTE MANAGEMENT OF COLORADO CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL HVORSLEV RISING I$AD ANALYSIS MONITORING WELL. GWMW-07 ONAWN RNEWE3 DATE MAY 1992 f+oe No. 923-2403 ZxE N/A I w2 40./7E9. NO. F&Z NO, IFICUN[ 40. Wel H-8 :i:..1.O61 K, RESIDUAL HEAD (Fr) K, 0.1 0.01 �.. +— T, —a., n c _ K1 S.W.L. = 43.35 ft. B.O.S. = 80.00 ft. doff = 0.17 ft. L = 10.00 ft. T = 3.77 min. M = 3.16 D = 0.67 ft. S.W.L. = 43.35 ft. B.O.S. = 80.00 ft. dor = 0.17 ft. L=10.OOft. T 6.77 min. M = 3.16 D= 0.67 ft 0 TIME (MINUTES) (0.17 ft)2la(2(3.16)(10.0 ft)) _ 0.67 ft 1 8(10.0 ft)(3.77 mm) Ki 2.21x10'` cm/sec (0.17 fi')21n(2(3.16)(10.0 ft)) K' 0.67 ft 8(10.0 ft)(6.77 min) K2 -6.25x10-' cm/sec 25 K(GeometricMean)-1.15x10"4 cm/sec NATURAL LOG CYCLES Golder Associates Denver, Colorado C:ENM/PROJECT WASTE MANAGEMENT OF COLORADO CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL tit DRAWN HVORSLEV RISING HEAD ANALYSIS MONITORING WELL GWMW-O8 DATE MAY 1992 fro MO. 923-2403 CNECX&) .7AC icx[ N/A enEbq _ we w. 7wt NO.,aC/.NO. ::,tuRE MO. H-9 931061 10 RESIDUAL HEAD(Fl) I 0.1 _ 0 10 20 S.W.L. = 59.69 ft. B.O.S. ms 75.00 ft. d,R=0.17ft. L = 10.00 ft. T = 18.46 min. M = 3.16 D = 0.469 ft. 30 40 I so TIME (MINUTES) ■ 60 (0.17 f?)21n[2(3.16)(10.0 ft)3 K. 0.469 ft 8(10.0 ft)(18.46 min) 1K -4.87x10"3 cm/sec NATURAL LOG CYCLL3S 'Golder Associates Denver, Colorado me HVORSLEV RISING HEAD ANALYSIS MONITORING WELL GWMW-09 cuevr/Pewter WASTE MANAGEMENT OF COLORADO CENTRAL. WELD SANITARY LANDFILL DMrw 'DAM MAY 1992 1"a NO. 9234403 c r.u4e ,.,- istxk N/A i0.4 w.,REv. PA. xaa wa+ fr rz. H-10 93i% 1 0.1 i I 1 ' r j I ) ! I I II 4---- T. ---I' 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 r TTiltNINO rES) , K, S.W.L. = 47.66 ft. B.O.S. = 60.00 ft. d,tr = 0.17 ft. L = 10.00 ft. T = 9.23 thin. M = 3.16 D = 0.67 ft. Ka S.W.L. = 47.66 ft. B.O.S. = 60.00 ft. &if = 0.17 ft. L = 10.00 ft. T = 14.42 min. M = 3.16 D = 0.67 ft. (0.17 fr)21n[ 2(3.16)(10.0 ft)) Kl 0.67 ft 8(10.0 ft)(923 min) K1a9.04x10"5 cm/sec (0.17 ft)zl n[ 2(3.16)(10.0 ft) 0.676 cs 8(10.0 ftX14.23 min) KZ -5.79x10"5 cm/see K(GeomeiricMean)-7.23x10"5 cm/sec ea/Golder� Associates Denver, Colorado inte HVORSLEV RISING HEAD ANALYSIS MONITORING WELL GWMW-10 CLFM/PROJECT WASTE MANAGEMENT OF COLORADO CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL QRAWN 7:Rt t JAC Ia.rE MAY 1992 Is:" "b• 923.2403 ICwc MO.IREY. NO. ?u,ac"0. H -ti sCA:. N/A Ina "O. X106^1 10 f I T, c i 1 (AL LOG CY0 r i z I 1 I I i i 0.1 I I I I I I I S.W.L. 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 TIME (MINUTES) = 15.20 ft. (0.17 Al 90 .V1342(3.16)(10.0 = 60.00 ft. K= 0.67 ft d,K = 0.17 ft. 8(10.0 ft)(79.77 min) L= 10.0 ft. T = 79.77 min. M=3.16 D = 0.67 ft. K -1.05x10_5 cm/sec Golder ®AssociatesDenver, Colorado MC HVORSLEV RISING HEAD ANALYSIS MONITORING WELL GWMW-11 CLEAT/PROJECT WASTE MANAGEMENT OF COLORADO CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL OMMN MAY 1992 £8 no. 923-2403 a.LCXEJ ac iscAa N/A twc 4 /REV, 40• Relc!m y (Flu .1o. ?RUBE No. H-12 9;1.06+ 10 a C T 0.1 P 20 40 60 80 100 120 TIME (MINUTES) S.W.L. = 30.92 ft. B.O.S. = 68.00 ft. d,R=0.17ft. L = 10.00 ft. T = 128.125 min. M = 3.16 A = 0.469 ft. (0.17 fr)2In[2(3.16)(10.0 ft)] �.y 0.469 ft 8(10.0 ft)(128.12 nun) K -7.02x10-6 cm/sec 1G -older ASSOCIaseS Denver. Colorado HVORSLEV RISING HEAD ANALYSIS MONITORING WELL. GWMW-12 CI:EM/RRw(CT WASTE MANAGEMENT OF COLORADO CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL ORMWN 10"TMAY 1992 wtcxm ,uc REVIEM'D wa1 403 NO. 923-2403 t'•C NO./ REV. VC Flas .No. rc:,Rc No, H-13 924061 10 RCSIDUAL I 'BAD (FP) 1 • 0,1 0 50 100 150 00 250 TIME (MINUTES) S.W.L. = 4,52 ft. B.O.S. = 60.00 ft. = 0.17 ft. L = 10.00 ft. T = 61.29 min. M = 3.16 D = 0.688 ft. (0.17 fr)21a[2(3.16)(10.0 ft)1 S 0.688 ft s 8(10.0 ft)(61.29 man) Ka1.35x10's cm/sec NATURAL LOG CYCLNS 'Golder Associates Denver, Colorado HVORSLEV RISING HEAD ANALYSIS MONITORING WELL GWMW-13 CUrscipm JCCT WASTE MANAGEMENT OF COLORADO CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL DRS tgreREv jAc Mtn ED N ID"r MAY 1992 FILE 0. N/A free No. 923-2403 IDwC N8./REV.. so. I ,r.::MC ..o. H-14 93106!. 10 ;IDUAL HEAD (FT) 1 1 1 1 1 L1 l i l ill U U C O a i i � C K 1 z i 1 • T I 0.1 0 20 S.W.L. 40 60 TIME = 7.35 ft 80 1 I (MINUTES) i �) 2 120 140 2(3.16)(10.0 fr) B.O.S. = 60.00 ft. (0.17 0.688 ft ICs cliff = 0.17 ft. 8(10.0 ft)(41.64 min) L= 10.00 ft. T = 41.64 man. M=3.16 D = 0.688 ft. K -1.99x10'5 Catiset ®ASSOciatesGOldez GoldrDenver, Colorado TTTLE HVORSLEV RISING HEAD ANALYSIS MONITORING WELL GWMW-14 CUENT/PROJECT WASTE MANAGEMENT OF COLORADO CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL DRAMS PATE MAY 1992 913. ! 41•2403 �Mc o.tut JAC set l N/A ,MO./REV. NO. A&evw tiv@f Ira „O. FICAE no. H.: is 06f , e �•:ju` „••• vials raw ".y x ry q tr :4 • {. �• •. �.u�.h.J.sx_r yletn+r_.'4ilt?f4. R+, '4: r —v �•.�: i'�.�tlMwr.• 4t11114.4° r�^f11"v�•J+4N 1 ENY y{1N ,a+a, r1.,e. ,. w.ri r M/s • .n. .4 �/i' rM.. • Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter Volatile Organics Target Compound List (TCL) Method 8240 Waste Management of North America, Inc. GWMW1 021837 -0001 -SA AQUEOUS Sampled: 27 MAR 92 28 MAR 92 Prepared: 31 MAR 92 Acetone Benzene Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Bromomethane 2-Butanone (MEK) Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromethane Di bromochloromethane 1,1-Dichloroethane 1,2-Dichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethene 1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 1,2-Dichioropropane cis-1,3-Dichloropropene trans-1,3-01chloropropene Ethyl benzene 2-Hexanone Methylene chloride 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIRK) Styrene 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane Tetrachloroethene Toluene 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1,1,2-Trichloroethane Trichloroethene Vinyl acetate Vinyl chloride Xylenes (total) Surrogate Toluene -d8 4-8romofluorobenzene ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable • Reported By: Michael Blades Received: 28 MAR 92 Analyzed: 08 APR 92 Reporting Result Units Limit NO ND ug/10 L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND L 10 ND ug/L 10 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ND g/ 5.0 10 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ND g/L 10 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ugh 0 ND 5.0 ND ND ug/L 10 L 5.0 ND NO g 10 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND L 5.0 NO ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 10 ND ug/L 10 NO ug/L 5.0 Recovery I03 97 (continued on following page) Approved By: Karen Kuiken A CMMn Caawm,Y Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Volatile Organics Target Compound List (TCL) Method 8240 Waste Management GWMW1 021837 -0001 -SA AQUEOUS 28 MAR 92 Surrogate 1,2-01chloroethane-d4 ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Michael Blades • of North America, Inc. Sampled: 27 MAR 92 Received: 28 MAR 92 Prepared: 31 MAR 92 Analyzed: 08 APR 92 Recovery 93 x Approved.Sy: Karen Kuiken Enseco A Corrimi Caarmaity Chlorinated Pesticides and PCB's Target Compound List (TCL) Method 8080 Client Name: Waste Management of North Amerca, Inc. Client ID: GWMW1 Lab ID: 021837 -0001 -SA Matrix: AQUEOUS Sampled: 27 MAR 92 Authorized: 28 MAR 92 Prepared: 31 MAR 92 Parameter gamma-BHC (Lindane) Endrin Methoxychlor Toxaphene Surrogate Dibutyl chlorendate ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Lue Lor Result Units ND L ND ug/L 9 ND uND g/L Recovery 53 % Received: 28 MAR 92 Analyzed: 08 APR 92 Reporting Limit 0.050 0.10 0.50 5.0 Approved.By: Karen Kuiken A G.Tion‘ Cavern 931064 Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: RCRA Herbicides Method 8150 waste Management of North America, Inc. GWMW-1 022450 -0001 -SA AQUEOUS Sampled: 27 APR 92 29 APR 92 Prepared: UI MAY 92 Parameter 2,4-0 2,4,5-7P (Silvex) Surrogate DCAA NO - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Susan McCool F Eriseco A cwt c,�,.av Received: 29 APR 92 Analyzed: 08 MAY 92 'Reporting Result Units Limit ND ug/L ND ug/L Recovery 90 12 1.7 Approved. By: Karen Kuiken 93106:1 • • Metals Dissolved Metals Enseco A Cars Caann.n. Client Name: Waste Management of North America, Inc. Client ID: GWMW1 Lab ID: 021837 -000I -SA Matrix: AQUEOUS Sampled: 27 MAR 92 Received: 28 MAR 92 Authorized: 28 MAR 92 Prepared: See Below Analyzed: See Below Reporting Analytical Prepared Analyzed Parameter Result Units Limit Method Date Date Arsenic ND mg/L 0.010 7060 NA 06 APR 92 Barium NO mg/L 0.010 6010 NA 02 APR 92 Cadmium ND mg/L 0.0050 6010 NA 02 APR 92 Calcium 471 mg/L 0.20 6010 NA 02 APR 92 Chromium NO mg/L 0.010 6010 NA 02 APR 92 Iron ND mg/L 0.10 6010 NA 02 APR 92 Lead NO mg/L 0.010 7421 NA 06 APR 92 Magnesium 244 mg/L 0.,20 6010 NA 02 APR 92 Manganese NO mg/L 0.010 6010 NA 02 APR 92 Mercury ND mg/L 0.00020 7470 30 MAR 92 31 MAR 92 Potassium ND mg/L 5.0 6010 NA 02 APR 92 Selenium ND mg/L 0.050 7740 NA 08 APR 92 Silver ND mg/L 0.010 6010 NA 02 APR 92 Sodium 77.9 mg/L 5.0 6010 NA 02 APR 92 ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Sandra Jones Approved By: Sandra Jones 921.061 General Inorganics Client Name: Waste Management of North America, Inc. Client ID: GWMW1 Lab ID: 021837 -0001 -SA Matrix: AQUEOUS Sampled: 27 MAR 92 Authorized: 28 MAR 92 Prepared: See Below Received: 28 MAR 92 Analyzed: See Below A Cam Company Reporting Analytical Prepared Analyzed Parameter Result Units Limit Method Date Date Alkalinity, Bicarb. as CaCO3 at pH 4.5 419 mg/L 5.0 310.1 NA 28 MAR 92 Alkalinity, Carb. as CaCO3 at pH 8.3 ND mg/L 5.0 310.1 NA 28 MAR 9Z Chloride 15.1 mg/L 3.0 300.0 NA 28 MAR 92 Ammonia as N NO mg/L 0.10 350.1 NA 30 MAR 92 Nitrate as N 4.7 mg/L 0.10 300.0 NA 28 MAR 92 Sulfate 1980 mg/L 25.0 300.0 NA 28 MAR 92 ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Steve Pope Approved 8y: Blake Sesser 23106.! • Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter Gross Alpha Radium 226 Gross Beta Radium 228 Radiochemistry Waste Management of North America, Inc. GWMW1 021837 -0001 -SA AQUEOUS 28 MAR 92 Prepared: See Below ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Sampled: 27 MAR 92 Received: 28 MAR 92 Analyzed: See Below Reporting Analytical Result Units Limit Method 67 pCi/L +-28) 2.0 pCi/L +-1.0) 50 pCi/L +-21) 1.9 pCi/L +-I.2) Reported By: Ramona Power • 900.0 705 Modified 900.0 EPA Specified Enseco w cn..q Ca-ty Prepared Analyzed Date Date NA 14 APR 92 NA 14 APR 92 NA 14 APR 92 NA 16 APR 92 Approved.8y: Roxanne Sullivan • • Volatile Organics Target Compound List (TCL) Method 8240 Client Name: Waste Management of North America, Inc. Client ID: GWMWZ Lab ID: 021837 -0002 -SA Matrix: AQUEOUS Sampled: 27' MAR 92 Received: 28 MAR 92 Authorized: 28 MAR 92 Prepared: 31 MAR 92 Analyzed: 09 APR 92 Reporting Result Units Limit 34 ug/L 10 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 10 ND ug/L 10 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND NO / L 0 10 ND uND g/L 0 L 10 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND L 5.0 NO ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 10 ND ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 10 ND NO ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 5.0 NO O ug/L L 1N10 ND ug/L 5.0 Parameter Acetone Benzene Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Bromomethane 2-Butanone (MEK) Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride Chlcrobenzene Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromethane Dibromochloromethane 1,1-Dichloroethane 1,2-01chloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethene 1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 1,2-Dichloropropane cis-1,3-0ichloropropene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene Ethyl benzene 2-Hexanone Methylene chloride 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) Styrene 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane Tetrachloroethene Toluene 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1,1,2-Trichloroethane Trichloroethene Vinyl acetate Vinyl chloride Xylenes (total) Surrogate Toluene -d8 4-Bromofluorobenzene NO - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Stephanie Boehnke • Recovery 105 98 et N (continued on following page) Approved By: Karen Kuiken Enseco A Cavemen Canpenv • • Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Volatile Organics Target Compound list (ICI) Method 8240 Waste Management of North America, Inc. GWMW2 021837 -0002 -SA AQUEOUS 28 MAR 92 Surrogate 1,2-Oichloroethane-d4 ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Stephanie Boehnke Sampled: 27 MAR 92 Received: 28 MAR 92 Prepared: 31 MAR 92 Analyzed: 09 APR 92 Recovery 104 Approved.8y: Karen Kuiken A tins Grow* 4''1464 Chlorinated Pesticides and PCB's Target Compound List (TCL) Method 8080 Client Name: Waste Management of North America, Inc. Client ID: GWMW2 Lab ID: 021837 -0002 -SA Matrix: AQUEOUS Sampled: 27 MAR 92 Authorized: 28 MAR 92 Prepared: 31 MAR 92 Parameter gamma-BHC (Lindane) Endrin Methoxychlor Toxaphene Surrogate Dibutyl chlorendate ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Lue Lor Result NC NC ND ND Units ug/L uug/L ug/L Recovery 42 y Received: 28 MAR 92 Analyzed: 08 APR 92 Reporting Limit 0.050 0.10 0.50 5.0 Approved.By: Karen Kuiken EnsecO A Canes Comp -n. 92106' Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Waste Management GWMW-2 022450 -0002 -SA AQUEOUS Z9 APR 92 Parameter 2,4-0 2,4,5-TP (Silvex) Surrogate 0CAA NO - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Susan McCool RCRA Herbicides Method 8150 of North America, Inc. Sampled: 27 APR 92 Prepared: 01 MAY 92 Received: 29 APR 92 Analyzed: 08 MAY 92 Reporting Result Units . Limit ND ug/L 12 ND ug/L 1.7 Recovery 90 % Approved By: Karen Kuiken A Gomm C,av,ys. 931O61 Client Name Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter Arsenic Barium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury Potassium Selenium Silver Sodium Metals Dissolved Metals : Waste Management of North America, Inc. GWMW2 021837 -0002 -SA AQUEOUS 28 MAR 92 Result ND 0.043 ND 469 ND NO NO 169 ND ND ND ND NO 124 ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Sandra Jones Sampled: 27 MAR 92 Received: 28 MAR 92 Prepared: See Below Analyzed: See Below Reporting Analytical Units Limit Method mg/L 0.010 7060 mg/L 0.010 6010 mg/L 0.0050 6010 mg/L 0.20 6010 mg/L 0.010 6010 mg/L 0.10 6010 mg/L 0.050 7421 mg/L 0.20 6010 mg/L 0.010 6010 mg/L 0.00020 7470 mg/L 5.0 6010 mg/L 0.050 7740 mg/L 0.010 6010 mg/L 5.0 6010 Approved. By: Sandra Jones A Canting G.•cw.. Prepared Analyzed Date Date NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 30 MAR 92 NA NA NA NA 06 APR 92 02 APR 92 02 APR 92 02 APR 92 02 APR 92 02 APR 92 06 APR 92 02 APR 92 02 APR 92 31 MAR 92 02 APR 92 08 APR 92 02 APR 92 02 APR 92 9106:1 Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix; Authorized: General Inorganics Waste Management of North America, Inc. GWMW2 021837 -0002 -SA AQUEOUS Sampled: 27 MAR 92 Received: 28 MAR 92 28 MAR 92 Prepared: See Below Analyzed: See Below Parameter Result Alkalinity, Bicarb. as CaC03 at pH 4.5 357 Alkalinity, Carb. as CaC03 at pH 8.3 ND Chloride 30.6 Ammonia as N ND Nitrate as N 18.5 Sulfate 1580 ND - Not detected NA + Not applicable Reported By: Steve Pope Enseco A Cow .,R Cper. Reporting Analytical Prepared Analyzed Units Limit Method Date Date mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L 5.0 310.1 5.0 310.1 3.0 300.0 0.10 350.1 0.10 300.0 25.0 300.0 NA NA NA NA NA NA Approved. By: Blake Besser 28 MAR 92 28 MAR 92 28 MAR 92 30 MAR 92 28 MAR 92 28 MAR 92 92106. 1. Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter Gross Alpha Radium 226 Gross Beta Radium 228 Waste Management GWMW2 021837 -0002 -SA AQUEOUS 28 MAR 92 Result 56 0.9 38 1.7 ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Ramona Power Prepared: See Below Radiochemistry of North America, Inc. Sampled: 27 MAR 92 Received: 28 MAR 92 Analyzed: See Below Reporting Analytical Units Limit Method pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L (+-27) +-22) +-1.3) 900.0 705 Modified 900.0 EPA Specified A ta^vs Comm" Prepared Analyzed Date Date NA 14 APR 9Z NA 14 APR 92 NA 14 APR 92 NA 16 APR 92 Approved•By: Roxanne Sullivan 921061 • • Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter Volatile Organics Target Compound List (TCL) Method 8240 Waste Management of North America, Inc. GWMW3 021782 -0001 -SA AQUEOUS Sampled: 25 MAR 92 25 MAR 92 Prepared: 26 MAR 92 Acetone Benzene Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Bromomethane 2-Butanone (MEK) Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromethane Oibromochloromethane 1,1-Dichloroethane 1.2-Dichloroethane 1,1-Oichloroethene 1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 1,2-01chlorooropane cis-1,3-Dichloropropene trans-1,3-Oichloropropene Ethyl benzene Z-Hexanone Methylene chloride 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) Styrene 1,1,2,2-Tetrachioroethane Tetrachloroethene Toluene 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1,1,2-Trichloroethane Trichloroethene Vinyl acetate Vinyl chloride Xylenes (total) Surrogate Toluene -d8 4-Bromofluorobenzene ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Scott McPhail Received: 25 MAR 92 Analyzed: 06 APR 9Z Reporting Result Units Limit NO ug/L 10 ND 5.0 NO ug/Lg/L 5.0 NO ug/L 5.0 ND L 10 ND ug/L 10 NO ug/L 5.0 NC ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 10 ND ND g/L 0 10 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ND ug/L 5.0 NO L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 10 NO ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 10 ND ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L ND ug/L 10 0 NO ug/L 10 NO ug/L 5.0 Recovery 100 % 93 % (continued on following page) Approved By: Karen Kuiken A Cuq,S Carer. 512106.1. Volatile Organics Target Compound List (TCL) Method 8240 Client Name: Waste Management Client ID: GWMW3 Lab ID: 021782 -0001 -SA Matrix: AQUEOUS Authorized: 25 MAR 92 Surrogate 1.2-Dichloroethane-d4 ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Scott McPhail of North America. Inc. Sampled: 25 MAR 92 Prepared: 26 MAR 92 Recovery 88 x Received: 25 MAR 92 Analyzed: 06 APR 92 Approved Sy: Karen Kuiken Enseco A Comet ca.I,YW 2.3106-', Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter Chlorinated Pesticides and PCB's Target Compound List (TCL) Method 8080 Waste Management of North America, Inc. GWMW3 021782 -0001 -SA AQUEOUS Sampled: 25 MAR 92 25 MAR 92 Prepared: 31 MAR 92 gamma-BHC (Lindane) Endrin Methoxychlor Toxaphene Surrogate Dibutyl chlorendate NO - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Lue Lor Result Units ND ug/L ND ug/L ND ug/L ND ug/L Recovery 75 Received: 25 MAR 92 Analyzed: 07 APR 92 Reporting Limit 0.050 0.10 0.50 5.0 Approved By: Karen Kuiken A twr. Ca.anv 932 06" Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: RCRA Herbicides Method 8150 Waste Management of North America, Inc. GWMW3 021782 -0001 -SA AQUEOUS Sampled: 25 MAR 92 25 MAR 92 Prepared: 30 MAR 92 Parameter 2,4-0 2,4,5-TP (Silvex) Surrogate DCAA ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Lue Lor Result Units ND ug/L ND ug/L Recovery 66 Received: 25 MAR 92 Analyzed: 13 APR 92 Reporting Limit 12 1.7 Approved By: Karen Kuiken Enseco Acl.,c awe., :i•WJ.'IE __ Client Name: Waste Management Client ID: GWMW3 Lab ID: 021782 -0001 -SA Matrix: AQUEOUS Authorized: 25 MAR 92 Parameter Arsenic Barium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury Potassium Selenium Silver Sodium Metals Dissolved Metals of North America, Inc. Sampled: 25 MAR 92 Received: 25 MAR 92 Prepared: See Below Analyzed: See Below Result Units ND mg/L ND mg/L ND 437 mg/L ND L ND mg/L ND mg/L 451 mg/L ND mg/L ND L 11.4 mg/L ND mg/L ND mg/L 266 mg/L ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Sandra Jones Reporting Limit 0.010 0.010 0.0050 0.20 0.010 0.10 0.010 0.20 0.010 0.00020 5.0 0.050 0.010 5.C Analytical Method 7060 6010 6010 6010 6010 6010 7421 6010 6010 7470 6010 7740 6010 6010 Approved By: Sandra Jones A Cuenv.c Ci.pa,, Prepared Analyzed Date Date NA 06 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 06 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 30 MAR 92 31 MAR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 08 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 3 .31.06f III Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: S General Inorganics Waste Management of North America, Inc. GWMW3 021782 -0001 -SA AQUEOUS 25 MAR 92 Parameter Result Alkalinity, Bicarb. as CaCO3 at pH 4.5 213 Alkalinity, Carb. as CaCO3 at pH 8.3 ND Chloride 71.0 Ammonia as N ND Nitrate as N 8.1 Sulfate 3270 ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Steve Pope Sampled: 25 MAR 92 Received: 25 MAR 92 Prepared: See Below Analyzed: See Below A Gana; C.^T.'. Reporting Analytical Prepared Analyzed Units Limit Method Date Date mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L 5.0 310.1 5.0 310.1 3.0 300.0 0.10 350.1 0.10 300.0 50.0 300.0 NA NA NA NA NA NA Approved By: Blake Sesser 26 MAR 92 26 MAR 92 26 MAR 92 30 MAR 92 26 MAR 92 26 MAR 92 91.4 6. • Enseco • Client Name Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter Gross Alpha Radium 226 Gross Beta Radium 228 Radiochemistry : Waste Management of North America. Inc. GWMW3 021782 -0001 -SA AQUEOUS Sampled: 25 MAR 92 25 MAR 92 Prepared: See Below Reporting Result Units Limit 180 pCi/L (+-50) 7.0 pCi/L (+2.0) 47 pCi/L +-32) 6.2 pCi/L (+-1.) NO - Not detected NA • Not applicable Reported By: Roxanne Sullivan • Received: 25 MAR 92 Analyzed: See Below Analytical Method 900.0 705 Modified 900.0 EPA Specified A Gmr., C.utrnv Prepared Analyzed Date Date NA 07 APR 92 NA 08 APR 92 NA 07 APR 92 NA 09 APR 92 Approved By: Roxanne Sullivan • • Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter Volatile Organics Target Compound List (TCL) Method 8240 Waste Management of North America. Inc. GWMW4 021825 -0006 -SA AQUEOUS Sampled: 26 MAR 92 27 MAR 92 Prepared: 31 MAR 92 Acetone Benzene Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Bromomethane 2-Butanone (MEK) Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromethane Dibromochloromethane 1,1-Dichloroethane I,2-Oichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethene 1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 1,2-Dichloropropane cis-1,3-Dichloropropene trans-I,3-Dichloropropene Ethyl benzene 2-Hexanone Methylene chloride 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) Styrene 1,1,2,2-Tetraciloroethane Tetrachloroethene Toluene 1,1,1-Trichioroethane 1,1,2-Trichioroethane Trichloroethene Vinyl acetate Vinyl chloride Xylenes (total) Surrogate Toluene -d8 4-Bromofiuorobenzene Result Units Received: 27 MAR 92 Analyzed: 06 APR 92 Reporting Limit ND ug/L 10 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 10 ND NO g/L 10 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 NO ND g/L 10 5.0 NO ug/L 10 ND ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 5.0 18 ND ug/L 5.0 ND L 5.0 NO ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 10 NO ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 10 ND ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 NO ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 10 ND u/L 10 ND ug/L 5.0 Recovery 98 95 (continued on following page) ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Scott McPhail Approved By: Karen Kuiken EXLseco A Cw,-a dory R2106:7. I • i Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix:. Authorized: Volatile Organics Target Compound List (TCL) Method 8240 Waste Management of North America, Inc. GWMW4 021825 -0006 -SA AQUEOUS Sampled: 26 MAR 92 27 MAR 92 Prepared: 31 MAR 92 Surrogate 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Scott McPhail Recovery 93 Received: 27 MAR 92 Analyzed: 06 APR 92 Approved.By: Karen Kuiken Enseco A C.velAg GalCrnr 513106". • 1 Chlorinated Pesticides and PCB's Target Compound List (TCL) Method 8080 Client Name: Waste Management of North America, Inc. Client ID: GWMW4 Lab ID: 021825 -0006 -SA Matrix: AQUEOUS Sampled: 26 MAR 92 Authorized: 27 MAR 92 Prepared: 31 MAR 92 Parameter gamma-BHC (Lindane) Endrin Methoxychlor Toxaphene Surrogate Dibutyl chlorendate ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Lue Lor Received: 27 MAR 92 Analyzed: 08 APR 92 Reporting Result Units Limit NO ug/L L NO ND ug/L ND ug/L Recovery 78 % 0.050 0.10 0.50 5.0 Approved .By: Karen Kuiken A Conte COTINIIPI :1.46". Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Waste Management GWMW4 021825 -0006 -SA AQUEOUS 27 MAR 92 Parameter 2,4-0 2,4,5-TP (Silvex) Surrogate DCAA ND - Not detected NA . Not applicable Reported By: Lue Lor RCRA Herbicides Method 8150 of North America, Inc. Sampled: 26 MAR 92 Prepared: 30 MAR 92 Result Units ND ug/L ND ug/L Recovery 87 It Received: 27 MAR 92 Analyzed: 14 APR 92 Reporting Limit 12 1.7 Approved.Sy: Karen Kuiken Enseco A Cann Cagan. 931061. Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix:. Authorized: Parameter Arsenic Barium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury Potassium Selenium Silver Sodium Metals Dissolved Metals Waste Management of North America, Inc. GWMW4 021825 -0006 -SA AQUEOUS Sampled: 26 MAR 92 Received: 27 MAR 92 27 MAR 92 Prepared: See Below Analyzed: See Below Result Reporting Analytical Units Limit Method ND mg/L NO mg/L ND mg/L 412 mg/L NO ND mg/L ND g502 m/L 0.61 mg/L NO mg/L ND g ND m/L ND mg/L 383 mg/L ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Sandra Jones 0.0050 7060 0.010 6010 0.0050 6010 0.20 6010 0.010 6010 0.10 6010 0.010 7421 0.20 6010 0.010 6010 0.00020 7470 5.0 6010 0.10 7740 0,010 6010 5.0 6010 Approved.•By: Will Pratt Enseco A Cna-fs Contoegyv Prepared Analyzed Date Date NA 06 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 06 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 02 APR 9Z 30 MAR 92 31 MAR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 08 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 :33106:1. • General Inorganics Client Name: Waste Management of North America, Inc. Client ID: GWMW4 Lab ID: 021825 -0006 -SA Matrix: AQUEOUS Sampled: 26 MAR 92 Authorized: 27 MAR 92 Prepared: See Below Received: 27 MAR 92 Analyzed: See Below Enseco A Canvas G -'w'.. Reporting Analytical Prepared Analyzed Parameter Result Units Limit Method Date Date Alkalinity, Bicarb. as CaCO3 at pH 4.5 490 mg/L 5.0 310.1 NA 27 MAR 92 Alkalinity, Carb. as CaCO3 at pH 8.3 ND mg/L 5.0 310.1 NA 27 MAR 92 Chloride 69.1 mg/L 6.0 300.0 NA 27 MAR 92 Ammonia as N ND mg/L 0.10 350.1 NA 30 MAR 92 Nitrate as N 0.11 mg/L 0.10 300.0 NA 27 MAR 92 Sulfate 4340 mg/L 50.0 300.0 NA 27 MAR 92 NO - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Steve Pope Approved By: Blake Sesser 831061 Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix:. Authorized: Parameter Gross Alpha Radium 226 Gross Beta Radium 228 Waste Management GWMW4 021825 -0006 -SA AQUEOUS 27 MAR 92 Prepared: See Below Reporting Result Units Limit 60 pCi/L +/- S1 I.5 pCi/L +/- 1.0 0.0 pCi/L +/- 40 0.0 pCi/L +/- 1.6 ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Ramona Power Radiochemistry of North America, Inc. Sampled: 26 MAR 92 Received: 27 MAR 92 Analyzed: See Below Analytical Method 900.0 70S Modified 900.0 EPA Specified Approved Sy: Blake Besser A Caawn .a^P^• Prepared Analyzed Date Date NA 09 APR 92 NA 14 APR 92 NA 09 APR 92 NA 09 APR 92 931.06f. • • Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter Volatile Organics Target Compound List (TCL) Method 8240 Waste Management of North America, Inc. GWMW5 021920-0001-5A AQUEOUS Sampled: 31 MAR 92 Received: 01 APR 92 01 APR 92 Prepared: 07 APR 92 Analyzed: 14 APR 92 Acetone Benzene Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Bromomethane 2-Butanone (MEK) Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromethane Dibromochloromethane 1,1-Dichloroethane 1,2-Dichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethene 1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 1,2-Dichloropropane cis-1,3-Dichloropropene trans-1,3-Oichloropropene Ethyl benzene 2-Hexanone Methylene chloride 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (M18K) Styrene 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane Tetrachlaroethene Toluene 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1,1,2-Trichloroethane Trichloroethene Vinyl acetate Vinyl chloride Xylenes (total) Surrogate Toluene -d8 4-Bromofiuorobenzene ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Stephanie 8oehnke Reporting Result Units Limit NO ug/L 20 NO ug/L 10 ND ug/L 10 ND L 10 NO ug/L 20 NO L 20 ND ug/L 10 ND ug/L 10 NO ug/L 10 NO 20 ND ug/Lug/L 10 NO L 20 ND ug/L 10 ND ug/L 10 NO ug/L 10 ND ug/L 10 26 ug/L 10 ND ug/L 10 ND ug/L 10 ND ug/L 10 NO ug/L 10 ND L 20 ND ug/L 10 ND L 20 ND ug/L 10 ND ug/L 10 210 ug/L 10 ND ug/L 10 ND ug/L 10 ND ug/L 10 70 W. 10 NO L 20 ND ug/L 20 ND ug/L 10 Recovery 101 93 (continued on following page) Approved'By: Dave Roberts A Curry% Camp•ny 93106:1 Volatile Organics Target Compound List (TCL) Method 8240 Client Name: Waste Management of North America, Inc. Client ID: GkMWS Lab ID: 021920 -0001 -SA Matrix: AQUEOUS Sampled: 31 MAR 92 Received: 01 APR 92 Authorized: 01 APR 92 Prepared: 07 APR 92 Analyzed: 14 APR 92 Surrogate Recovery 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 97 % ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Stephanie Boehnke Approved -By: Dave Roberts A Cumw{ CuTp.nr 931061 Chlorinated Pesticides and PCB's Target Compound List (TCL) Method 8080 Client Name: Waste Management of North America, Inc. Client ID: GWMW5 Lab ID: 021920 -0001 -SA Matrix: AQUEOUS Sampled: 31 MAR 92 Authorized: 01 APR 92 Prepared: 06 APR 92 Parameter gamma-BHC (Lindane) Endrin Methoxychior Toxaphene Surrogate Oibutyl chlorendate NO - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Lue Lor Result ND NO NO ND Recovery 6'1 Received: 01 APR 92 Analyzed: I4 APR 92 Reporting Units Limit ug/L u/L ug%L 0.050 0.10 0.50 5.0 Approved By: Karen Kuiken A Came{ C.,np... ,l J1.RJp Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: RCRA Herbicides Method 8150 Waste Management of North America, Inc. GWMWS 021920 -0001 -SA AQUEOUS Sampled: 31 MAR 92 01 APR 92 Prepared: 06 APR 92 Parameter 2,4-0 2,4,5-TP (Silvex) Surrogate OCAA NO - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Lue Lor Received: 01 APR 92 Analyzed: 13 APR 92 Reporting Result Units Limit ND L ND ug/L Recovery 78 12 1.7 Approved.By: Karen Kuiken A Caving Compm! 9,21.06ft • Client Name Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter Arsenic Barium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury Potassium Selenium Silver Sodium : Waste Management GWMW5 021920 -0001 -SA AQUEOUS 01 APR 92 Metals Dissolved Metals of North America, Inc. Sampled: 31 MAR 92 Received: 01 APR 92 Prepared: See Below Analyzed: See Below Result Units ND mg/L NO mg ND mg/L 474 mg/L ND mg/L NO mg/L ND g/ 647 mg/L 0.081 mg/L ND mg/L 7.0 mg/L ND mg/L ND mg/L 288 mg/L ND . Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Will Pratt Reporting Limit 0.010 0.010 0.0050 0.20 0.010 0.10 0.050 0.20 0.010 0.00020 5.0 0.050 0.010 5.0 Analytical Method 7060 6010 6010 6010 6010 6010 7421 6010 6010 7470 6010 7740 6010 6010 Enseco A Ca,w cJT,M. Prepared Analyzed Date Date NA 10 APR 92 NA 07 APR 92 NA 07 APR 92 NA 07 APR 92 NA 07 APR 92 NA 07 APR 92 NA 10 APR 92 NA 07 APR 92 NA 07 APR 92 03 APR 92 05 APR 92 NA 07 APR 92 NA 13 APR 92 NA 07 APR 92 NA 07 APR 92 Approved. By: Debra Hosford r :J..tJ J_ Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: General Inorganics Waste Management of North America, Inc. GWMW5 021920 -0001 -SA AQUEOUS Sampled: 31 MAR 92 Received: 01 APR 92 01 APR 92 Prepared: See Below Analyzed: See Below Parameter Result Alkalinity, Bicarb. as CaC03 at pH 4.5 487 Alkalinity, Carb. as CaC03 at pH 8.3 ND Chloride 21.0 Ammonia as N ND Nitrate as N 3.2 Sulfate 3800 NO - Not detected NA - Not applicable Amk Reported By: Steve Pope Reporting Analytical Units Limit Method mg/L 5.0 310.1 mg/L 5.0 310.1 mg/L 6.0 300.0 mg/L 0.10 350.1 mg/L 0.10 300.0 mg/L 50.0 300.0 Enseco A Cana Company Prepared Analyzed Date Date NA NA NA NA NA NA Approved.By: Blake Besser 01 APR 9Z 01 APR 92 03 APR 92 06 APR 92 03 APR 92 03 APR 92 %i_/06". • Radiochemistry A Caymit Company Client Name: Waste Management of North America, Inc. Client ID: GWMW5 Lab ID: 021920 -0001 -SA Matrix: AQUEOUS Sampled: 31 MAR 92 Received: 01 APR 92 Authorized: 01 APR 92 Prepared: See Below Analyzed: See Below Reporting Analytical Prepared Analyzed Parameter Result Units Limit Method Date Date Gross Alpha 19 pCi/L +-39) 900.0 NA 14 APR 92 Radium 226 0.0 pCi/L +-0.4) 705 Modified NA 14 APR 92 Gross Beta 36 pCi/L +-42) 900.0 NA 14 APR 92 Radium 228 1.4 pCi/L +-1.3) EPA Specified NA 16 APR 92 ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Roxanne Sullivan Approved By: Roxanne Sullivan 2,2106:9". Volatile Organics Target Compound List (TCL) Method 8240 Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter Waste Management of North America, Inc. GWMW5A 021887 -0001 -SA AQUEOUS Sampled: 30 MAR 92 31 MAR 92 Prepared: 31 MAR 92 Acetone Benzene Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Bromomethane 2-Butanone (MEK) Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromethane Dibromochloromethane 1,1-Oichloroethane 1,2-0ichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethene 1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 1,2-Dichloropropane cis-1,3-Dichloropropene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene Ethyl benzene 2-Hexanone Methylene chloride 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) Styrene 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane Tetrachloroethene Toluene 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1,1,2-Trichloroethane Trichloroethene Vinyl acetate Vinyl chloride Xylenes (total) Surrogate Toluene -d8 4-Bromofluorobenzene ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Shawn Kassner Received: 31 MAR 92 Analyzed: 29 APR 92 Reporting Result Units Limit ND ug/L 10 ND ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 10 ND ug/L 10 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 5.0 NO ND g/L 10 5.0 NO NO g/L 10 5.0 5.4 ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 5.0 17 ug/L 5.0 5.8 ug/l 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ND / L 5.0 10 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 10 NO L 5.0 NO ug/L 5.0 140 ug/L 5.0 ND ugh. 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 5.0 5O ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 10 ND NO g/L 10 5.0 Recovery 99 % 99 % (continued on following page) Approved By: Karen Kuiken 22106" Volatile Organics Target Compound List (TCL) Method 8240 Client Name: Waste Management of North America, Inc. Client ID: GWMWSA Lab ID: 021887 -0001 -SA Matrix: AQUEOUS Sampled: 30 MAR 92 Authorized: 31 MAR 92 Prepared: 31 MAR 92 Surrogate 1,2-Dichtoroethane-d4 ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Shawn Kassner Recovery 94 X Received: 31 MAR 92 Analyzed: 29 APR 92 Approved By: Karen Kuiken 4 31.46" ' Chlorinated Pesticides and PCB's Target Compound List (TCL) Method 808C Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter Waste Management of North America, Inc. GWMW5A 021887 -0001 -SA AQUEOUS Sampled: 30 MAR 92 31 MAR 92 Prepared: 06 APR 92 gamma-BHC (Lindane) Endrin Methoxychlor Toxaphene Surrogate Dibutyl chlorendate ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Lue Lor Received: 31 MAR 92 Analyzed: 14 APR 92 Reporting Result Units Limit ND ND ND NO ug/L ug/L ugh!. ug/L Recovery 66 0.050 0.10 0.50 5.0 Approved By: Karen Kuiken nommomminatim RCRA Herbicides Method 8150 Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Waste Management of North America, Inc. GWMWSA 021887 -000I -SA AQUEOUS Sampled: 30 MAR 92 31 MAR 92 Prepared: 06 APR 92 Parameter 2,4-0 2,4,5-TP (Silvex) Surrogate 0CAA ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Lue Lor Result ND ND Received: 31 MAR 92 Analyzed: 13 APR 92 Reporting Units Limit ug/L ug/L Recovery 84 7. 12 1.7 Approved By: Karen Kuiken Metals Dissolved Metals Client Name Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter Arsenic Barium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury Potassium Selenium Silver Sodium : Waste Management of North America, Inc. GWMW5A 021887 -0001 -SA AQUEOUS Sampled: 30 MAR 92 31 MAR 92 Prepared: See Below Result Units ND mg/L 0.023 mg/L N4977 mg/L ND mg ND mg/L 7mg/L 577 mg/t. 0.24 mg/L N7 mg/L 6.8 g/ ND mg /L ND mg/L 238 mg/L ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Sandra Jones Reporting Limit 0.010 0.010 0.0050 0.20 0.010 0.10 0.10 0.20 0.010 0.00020 5.0 0.10 0.010 5.0 Received: 31 MAR 92 Analyzed: See Below Analytical Method 7060 6010 6010 6010 6010 6010 7421 6010 6010 7470 6010 7740 6010 6010 Approved By: Will Pratt Prepared Analyzed Date Date NA 06 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 06 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 03 APR 92 05 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 08 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 9.2106" General Inorganics Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Waste Management of North America, Inc. GWMW5A 021887 -0001 -SA AQUEOUS 31 MAR 92 Prepared: See Below Parameter Result Alkalinity, Bicarb. as CaCO3 at pH 4.5 484 Alkalinity, Carb. as CaCO3 at pH 8.3 ND Chloride 21.7 Ammonia as N ND Nitrate as N 4.2 Sulfate 3850 ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Steve Pope Sampled: 30 MAR 92 Received: 31 MAR 92 Analyzed: See Below Reporting Analytical Prepared Analyzed Units Limit Method Date Date mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L 5.0 310.1 5,0 310.1 6.0 300.0 0.10 350.1 0.10 300.0 50.0 300.0 NA NA NA NA NA NA Approved. By: Blake Sesser 31 MAR 92 31 MAR 92 31 MAR 92 06 APR 92 31 MAR 92 31 MAR 92 821.061 Radiochemistry • • Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter Radium 226 Gross Alpha Gross Beta Radium 228 Waste Management of North America, Inc. GWMW5A 021887 -0001 -SA AQUEOUS Sampled: 30 MAR 92 31 MAR 92 Prepared: See Below Result 1.4 90 55 0.4 ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Ramona Power Units pL pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L Received: 31 MAR 92 Analyzed: See Below Reporting Analytical Limit Method +/- 0.9 +/- 50 +/- 42 +/- 2.1 705 Modified 900.0 900.0 EPA Specified Prepared Analyzed Date Date NA 14 APR 92 NA 14 APR 92 NA 14 APR 92 NA 16 APR 92 Approved By: Blake Sesser Volatile Organics Target Compound List (TCL) Method 8240 Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter Waste Management of North America, Inc. GWMW5A-OUP 021887 -0001 -DU AQUEOUS Sampled: 30 MAR 92 31 MAR 92 Prepared: 31 MAR 92 Acetone Benzene Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Bromomethane 2-Butanone (MEK) Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride Chiorobenzene Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromethane Dibromochloromethane 1,1-Dichloroethane 1,2-Dichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethene 1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 1,2-Dichloropropane cis-1,3-Dichloropropene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene Ethyl benzene 2-Hexanone Methylene chloride 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) Styrene 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane Tetrachloroethene Toluene 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1,1,2-Trichloroethane Trichioroethene Vinyl acetate Vinyl chloride Xylenes (total) Surrogate Toluene -d8 4-Bromoflucrobenzene NO - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Shawn Kassner Result ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NO ND ND ND 5.9 ND ND 19 6.6 ND ND NO ND NO ND ND ND 150 ND ND ND 52 NO ND ND Recovery Received: 31 MAR 92 Analyzed: 29 APR 92 Reporting Units Limit ug/L 10 uug/L 5.0 L 5.0 ug/L 5.0 L 10 ug/L 10 uug/L 5.0 L 5.0 g/ 5.0 10 ug/L 5.0 ug/L 10 L 5.0 ug/L 5.0 ug/L 5.0 ug/L 5.0 ug/L 5.0 ug/L 5.0 ug/L 5.0 ug/L 5.0 g/ 10 5.0 ug/L 10 ug/L 5.0 ug/L 5.0 ug/L 5.0 il 5.0 ug/L 5.0 ug/L 5.0 ug/L 10 ug/L 10 ug/L 5.0 99 101 (continued on following page) Approved By: Karen Kuiken Volatile Organics Target Compound List (TCL) Method 8240 Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Waste Management GWMW5A-OUP 021887 -0001 -DU AQUEOUS 31 MAR 92 Surrogate 1,2-Oichloroethane-d4 ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By:' Shawn Kassner of North America, Inc. Sampled: 30 MAR 92 Prepared: 31 MAR 92 Recovery 93 Received: 31 MAR 92 Analyzed: 29 APR 92 Approved By: Karen Kuiken 821.0€:". Chlorinated Pesticides and PCB's Target Compound List (TCL) Method 8080 I Client Name: Waste Management o£ North America, Inc. Client ID: GWMW5A-DUP Lab ID: 021887-0001-0U Matrix: AQUEOUS Sampled: 30 MAR 92 Authorized: 31 MAR 92 Prepared: 06 APR 92 Parameter gamma-BHC (Lindane) Endrin Methoxychlor Toxaphene Surrogate Dibutyl chlorendate ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Lue Lor Received: 31 MAR 92 Analyzed: 14 APR 92 Reporting Result Units Limit ND ug/L ND g ND ug/L ND ug/L Recovery 69 0.050 0.10 0.50 5.0 Approved By: Karen Kuiken -' 31.06'' RCRA Herbicides Method 8150 Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Waste Management of North America, Inc. GWMW5A-OUP 021887 -0001 -DU AQUEOUS Sampled: 30 MAR 92 31 MAR 92 Prepared: 06 APR 92 Parameter 2,4-0 2,4,5-TP (Silvex) Surrogate DCAA ND • Not detected NA • Not applicable Reported By: Lue Lor Received: 31 Analyzed: 13 Reporting Result Units Limit NO NO g L 12 1.7 Recovery 86 Approved By: Karen Kuiken MAR 92 APR 92 Metals Dissolved Metals Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter Arsenic Barium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury Potassium Selenium Silver Sodium Waste Management of North America. Inc. GWMW5A-OUP 021887 -0001 -DU AQUEOUS Sampled: 30 MAR 92 31 MAR 92 Prepared: See Below Result Units ND mg/L 0.025 mg/ L ND mg 506 mg/L NO mg/L NO mg/L NO mg/L 586 L 0.24 mg/L ND mg/L 7.0 ND mg/L ND mg/L 244 mg/L ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Sandra Jones Received: 31 MAR 92 Analyzed: See Below Reporting Analytical Limit Method Prepared Analyzed Date Date 0.010 7060 NA 06 APR 92 0.010 6010 NA 02 APR 92 0.0050 6010 NA 02 APR 92 0.20 6010 NA 02 APR 92 0.010 6010 NA 02 APR 92 0.10 6010 NA 02 APR 92 0.10 7421 NA 06 APR 92 0.20 6010 NA 02 APR 92 0.010 6010 NA 02 APR 92 0.00020 7470 03 APR 92 05 APR 92 5.0 6010 NA, 02 APR 92 0.10 7740 NA 08 APR 92 0.010 6010 NA 02 APR 92 5.0 6010 NA 02 APR 92 Approved By: Will Pratt 931061 General Inorganics Client Name: Client ID: lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Waste Management of North America, Inc. GWMW5A-OUP 021887 -0001 -DU AQUEOUS Sampled: 30 MAR 92 Received: 31 MAR 92 31 MAR 92 Prepared: See Below Analyzed: See Below Parameter Result Alkalinity, Bicarb. as CaCO3 at pH 4.5 486 Alkalinity, Carb. as CaCO3 at pH 8.3 ND Chloride 21.8 Ammonia as N NO Nitrate as N 4.2 Sulfate 3840 ND - Not detected NA + Not applicable Reported By: Steve Pope Reporting Analytical Units Limit Method mg/L 5.0 310.1 mg/L 5.0 310.1 mg/L 6.0 300.0 mg/L 0.10 350.1 mg/L 0.10 300.0 mg/L 50.0 300.0 Approved.By: Blake Sesser Prepared Analyzed Date Date NA NA NA NA NA NA 31 MAR 92 31 MAR 92 31 MAR 92 06 APR 92 31 MAR 92 31 MAR 92 931061 Radiochemistry Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Waste Management GWMW5A-DUP 021887 -0001 -DU AQUEOUS 31 MAR 92 Parameter Result Gross Alpha Radium 226 Gross Beta Radium 228 62 0.9 38 0.4 ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Ramona Power Prepared: See Below of North America, Inc. Sampled: 30 MAR 92 Received: 31 MAR 92 Analyzed: See Below Reporting Analytical Units Limit Method pCi/L +/- 41 900.0 pCi/L +/- 0.7 705 Modified pCi/L +/- 37 900.0 pCi/L +/- 1.3 EPA Specified Approved By: Blake Besser Prepared Analyzed Date Date NA 14 APR 92 NA 14 APR 92 NA 14 APR 92 NA 16 APR 92 931061 • • Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter Volatile Organics Target Compound List (TCL) Method 8240 Waste Management of North America, Inc. GWMW6 021825 -0001 -SA AQUEOUS Sampled: 25 MAR 92 27 MAR 92 Prepared: 31 MAR 92 Acetone Benzene Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Bromomethane 2-Butanone (MEK) Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromethane Dibromochloromethane 1,1-Dichloroethane 1,2-Dichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethene 1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 1,2-Dichloropropane cis-1,3-Dichloropropene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene Ethyl benzene 2-Hexanone Methylene chloride 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIRK) Styrene 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane Tetrachloroethene Toluene 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1,1,2-Trichloroethane Trichloroethene Vinyl acetate Vinyl chloride Xylenes (total) Surrogate Toluene -d8 4-Bromofluorobenzene ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable (1 Reported By: Scott McPhail Received: 27 MAR 92 Analyzed: 06 APR 92 Reporting Result Units Limit ND ug/L 10 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 10 ND ug/L 10 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 10 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 10 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L ND ug/L 0 10 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 10 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 10 ND ug/L 10 ND ug/L 5.0 Recovery 101 % 90 % (continued on following page) Approved By: Karen Kuiken Camels EllSENDO ACun 931061 e • Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Volatile Organics Target Compound List (TCL) Method 8240 Waste Management of North America, Inc. 6WMW6 021825 -0001 -SA AQUEOUS 27 MAR 92 Surrogate 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Ala Reported By: Scott McPhail Sampled: 25 MAR 92 Received: 27 MAR 92 Prepared: 31 MAR 92 Analyzed: 06 APR 92 Recovery 87 Approved.8y: Karen Kuiken A Corning Co.pr.. 931061 Chlorinated Pesticides and PCB's Target Compound List (TCL) Method 80730 Client Name: Waste Management of North America, Inc. Client ID: GWMW6 Lab ID: 021825 -0001 -SA Matrix:. AQUEOUS Sampled: 25 MAR 92 Authorized: 27 MAR 92 Prepared: 31 MAR 92 Parameter Earoma-BHC (Lindane) ndrin Methoxychlor Toxaphene Surrogate Oibutyl chiorendate ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Lue Lor Received: 27 MAR 92 Analyzed: 08 APR 9Z Reporting Result Units Limit ND ug/L ND ug/L NO L ND ug/L 9 Recovery 45 0.050 0.10 0.50 5.0 Approved -By: Karen Kuiken ACamay 9310€I Client Name: Client ID: Lab I0: Matrix: Authorized: RCRA Herbicides Method 3150 Waste Management of North America, Inc. GWMW-6 022450 -0006 -SA AQUEOUS Sampled: 28 APR 92 29 APR 92 Prepared: 01 MAY 92 Parameter 2,4-0 2,4,5-TP (Silvex) Surrogate OCAA ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Susan McCooi Result NO NO Received: 29 APR 92 Analyzed: 08 MAY 92 Reporting Units Limit ug/L ug/L Recovery 85 % 12 Approved By: Karen Kuiken 1.7 Enseco A Cain tMwyMy 931%1 • Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix:. Authorized: Parameter Arsenic Barium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury Potassium Selenium Silver Sodium Metals Dissolved Metals Waste Management of North America, Inc. GWMW6 021825 -0001 -SA AQUEOUS Sampled: 25 MAR 92 27 MAR 92 Prepared: See Below Result Units ND mg/L 0.011 mg/` ND thg/L 468 mg/L NO mg/L ND mg/L ND mg/L 388 mg/L 0.011 mg/L NO mg/L 8.4 mg/L ND mg/L NO mg/L 181 mg/L ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Sandra Jones Received: 27 MAR 92 Analyzed: See Below Reporting Analytical Limit Method 0.010 7060 0.010 6010 0.0050 6010 0.20 6010 0.010 6010 0.I0 6010 0.050 7421 0.20 6010 0.010 6010 0.00020 7470 5,0 6010 0.050 7740 0.010 6010 5 6010 Approved.By: Will Pratt A Cans Cwnpanv Prepared Analyzed Date Date NA 06 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 06 APR 92 NA 02 APR 9Z NA 02 APR 92 30 MAR 92 31 MAR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 08 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 931061 General Inorganics A Gang G-pw.. Client Name: Waste Management of North America, Inc. Client ID: GWMW6 Lab ID: 021825 -0001 -SA Matrix:. AQUEOUS Sampled: 25 MAR 92 Received: 27 MAR 92 Authorized: 27 MAR 92 Prepared: See Below Analyzed: See Below Reporting Analytical Prepared Analyzed Parameter Result Units Limit Method Date Date Alkalinity, Bicarb. as CaCO3 at pH 4.5 284 mg/L 5.0 310.1 NA 27 MAR 92 Alkalinity, Carb. as CaCO3 at pH 8.3 NO mg/L 5.0 310.1 NA 27 MAR 92 Chloride 57.1 mg/L 3.0 300.0 NA 27 MAR 92 Ammonia as N NO mg/L 0.10 350.1 NA 30 MAR 92 Nitrate as N 6.3 mg/L 0.10 300.0 NA 27 MAR 92 Sulfate 3030 mg/L 50.0 300.0 NA 27 MAR 92 NO - Not detected - NA - Not applicable Reported By: Steve Pope Approved By: Blake Sesser 931061 Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix:. Authorized: Parameter Gross Alpha Radium 226 Gross Beta Radium 228 Waste Management GWMW6 021825 -0001 -SA AQUEOUS 27 MAR 92 Result 64 1.2 57 0.9 NO - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Ramona Power Radiochemistry of North America, Inc. Sampled: 25 MAR 92 Received: 27 MAR 92 Prepared: See Below Analyzed: See Below Reporting Analytical Units Limit Method pCi/L +/- 35 900.0 pCi/i. +/- 0.9 705 Modified pCi/L +/- 30 900.0 pCi/L +/- 1.6 EPA Specified Approved.By: Blake Sesser Enseco A Corning crew. Prepared Analyzed Date Date NA 09 APR 92 NA 14 APR 92 NA 09 APR 92 NA 09 APR 9Z 931061 • • Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter Volatile Organics Target Compound List (TCL) Method 8240 Waste Management of North America, Inc. GWMW7 021825 -0003 -SA AQUEOUS Sampled: 26 MAR 92 27 MAR 92 Prepared: 31 MAR 92 Acetone Benzene Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Bromomethane 2-Butanone (MEK) Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromethane Dibromochloromethane 1,1-Dichloroethane 1,2-Dichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethene 1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 1,2-DichloropPropene cis-1,3-Oichloropropene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene Ethyl benzene 2-Hexanone Methylene chloride 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIRK) Styrene 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane Tetrachloroethene Toluene 1.1,1-Trichloroethane 1,1,2-Trichloroethane Trichloroethene Vinyl acetate Vinyl chloride Xylenes (total) Surrogate Toluene -d8 4-Bromofluorobenzene ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Scott McPhail Received: 27 MAR 92 Analyzed: 06 APR 92 Reporting Result Units Limit ND g/ NO ug/L ND uL ND gL ND ug/L / ND ug/L ND u/L ND ug/L NO ug/L ND ug/L ND ug/L ND ug/L ND ug/L ND ug/L 6,1 ug/L ND ug/L NO L ND ug/L ND ug/L ND L 0 ug/L ND ug/L 10 ug/L NO ug/L ND u/L ND ug/L 9.5 ug/L ND ND ug/L ND L ND ug/L NO ug/L ND g NO u9/L Recovery 103 7. 92 (continued on following page) 10 5.0 5.0 5.0 10 10 5.0 5.0 5.0 10 5.0 10 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 10 5.0 I0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 10 10 5.0 Approved By: Karen Kuiken Enseco 931061 Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Volatile Organics Target Compound List (TCL) Method 8240 Waste Management of North America, Inc. GWMW7 021825 -0003 -SA AQUEOUS 27 MAR 92 Surrogate 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 NO • Not detected NA • Not applicable Reported By: Scott McPhail Sampled: 26 MAR 92 Prepared: 31 MAR 92 Recovery 91 Received: 27 MAR 92 Analyzed: 06 APR 92 Approved -By: Karen Kuiken A ciena4C .w 931061 Chlorinated Pesticides and PCB's Target Compound List (TCL) Method 8080 Client Name: Waste Management of North America, Inc. Client I0: GWMW7 Lab ID: 021825 -0003 -SA Matrix: AQUEOUS Sampled: 26 MAR 92 Authorized: 27 MAR 92 Prepared: 31 MAR 92 Parameter gamma-BHC (Lindane) Endrin Methoxychlor Toxaphene Surrogate Oibutyl chlorendate NO - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Lue Lor Result Units NO ug/L NI) ug/L NI) ug/L NO ug/L Recovery 75 7. Received: 27 MAR 92 Analyzed: 08 APR 92 Reporting Limit Approved -By: Karen Kuiken 0.050 0.10 0.50 5.0 Enseco A CMMlt Ce.gnv 931061 RCRA Herbicides Method 8150 Client Name: Waste Management of North America, Inc. Client ID: GWMW7 Lab ID: 021825 -0003 -SA Matrix: AQUEOUS Sampled: 26 MAR 92 Received: 27 MAR 92 Authorized: 27 MAR 92 Prepared: 30 MAR 92 Analyzed: 13 APR 92 Parameter 2,4-0 2,4,5-TP (Silvex) Surrogate OCAA NO - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Lue Lor Reporting Result Units Limit NO ug/L 12 NO ug/L 1.7 Recovery 81 4/0 Approved By: Karen Kuiken COMINV C..nynr 931061 Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter Arsenic Barium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury Potassium Selenium Silver Sodium Metals Dissolved Metals Waste Management of North America, Inc. GWMW7 021825 -0003 -SA AQUEOUS Sampled: 26 MAR 92 Received: 27 MAR 92 27 MAR 92 Prepared: See Below Analyzed: See Below Result Units ND 0.021 9/L ND 416 9/L NO NO mg/L NO L 396 mg/I 0.26 mg/L NO 7.6 mg/L NO mg/L ND mg/L 217 mg/L NO - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Sandra Jones Reporting Analytical Limit Method 0.010 7060 0.010 6010 0.0050 6010 0.20 6010 0.010 6010 0.10 6010 0.050 7421 0.20 6010 0.010 6010 0.00020 7470 5.0 6010 0.050 7740 0.010 6010 5.0 6010 Approved•8y: Will Pratt A COT.,i Cuinp.nv Prepared Analyzed Date Date NA 06 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 06 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 30 MAR 92 31 MAR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 08 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 931061 Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Waste Management GWMW7 021825 -0003 -SA AQUEOUS 27 MAR 92 Parameter Result Alkalinity, Bicarb. as CaCO3 at pH 4.5 493 Alkalinity, Garb. as CaCO3 at pH 8.3 ND Chloride 13.7 Ammonia as N NO Nitrate as N 1.6 Sulfate 2740 ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Steve Pope General Inorganics of North America, Inc. Enseco A G.•... l.anvan. Sampled: 26 MAR 92 Received: 27 MAR 92 Prepared: See Below Analyzed: See Below Reporting Analytical Prepared Analyzed Units Limit Method Date Date mg/L 5.0 310.1 mg/L 5.0 310.1 mg/L 3.0 300.0 mg/L 0.10 350.1 mg/L 0.10 300.0 mg/L 50.0 300.0 Approved.By: Blake Besser NA NA NA NA NA NA 27 MAR 92 27 MAR 92 27 MAR 92 30 MAR 92 27 MAR 92 27 MAR 92 931061 Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter Radium 226 Gross Alpha Gross Beta Radium 228 Waste Management GWMW7 021825 -0003 -SA AQUEOUS 27 MAR 92 Result 0.0 82 76 1.3 ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Ramona Power Prepared: See Below Reporting Units Limit pLi/L +1 0.4 - 36 pCi/L +/- 32 pLi/L +/- 1.3 Radiochemistry of North America, Inc. Sampled: 26 MAR 92 Received: 27 MAR 92 Analyzed: See Below Analytical Method 705 Modified 900.0 900.0 EPA Specified Approved By: Blake Sesser F.nseco A Ca. Cam Prepared Analyzed Date Date NA 14 APR 92 NA 09 APR 92 NA 09 APR 92 NA 09 APR 92 931061 • Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter Volatile Organics Target Compound List (TCL) Method 824.0 Waste Management of North America, Inc. GWMWB 021837 -0003 -SA AQUEOUS Sampled: 27 MAR 92 28 MAR 92 Prepared: 31 MAR 92 Acetone Benzene Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Bromomethane 2-Butanone (MEK) Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromethane Dibromochloromethane 1,1-Dichloroethane 1,2-Dichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethene 1,2-Dichloroethene total) •1,2- ichloropropane cis-1,3-Dichloropropene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene Ethyl benzene 2-Hexanone Methylene chloride 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIRK) Styrene 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane Tetrachloroethene Toluene 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1,1,2-Trichloroethane Trichloroethene Vinyl acetate Vinyl chloride Xylenes (total) Surrogate Toluene -d8 4-Bromofluorobenzene NO - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Stephanie Boehnke Received: 28 MAR 92 Analyzed: 09 APR 92 Reporting Result Units Limit NO ug/L ND ug/L ND ug/L ND ug/L ND ug/L NO L ND ug/L ND ug/L ND ug/L ND L ND ug/L ND ug/L ND u 9 ND L O ug/L ND ug/L ND ug/L NO L ND ug/L ND ND ug/L NO ND ug/L ND ND ug/L ND ug/L ND ug/L ND ug/L ND ug/L ND ug/L ND ug/L ND ND ug/L ND ug/L Recovery 105 96 (continued on following page) 10 5.0 5.0 5.0 10 10 5.0 5.0 5.0 10 5.0 10 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 10 5.0 10 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 10 10 5.0 Approved By: Karen Kuiken A cr,.% Carp.,. 931061 Radiochemistry Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter Radium 226 Gross Alpha Gross Beta Radium 228 Waste Management GWMWII 021825 -0007 -SA AQUEOUS 27 MAR 92 ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: • Result 2.5 10 22 2.4 Ramona Power of North America, Inc. Sampled: 26 MAR 92 Received: 27 MAR 92 Prepared: See Below Analyzed: See Below Units pCi/L pCi/l pCi/L pci/L Reporting Analytical Limit Method +/- 1.3 +/- 31 +/- 31 +/- 1.7 705 Modified 900.0 900.0 EPA Specified Approved 3y: Blake Sesser Prepared Analyzed Date Date NA 14 APR 92 NA 09 APR 92 NA 09 APR 92 NA 09 APR 92 931061 • • Volatile Organics Target Compound List (TCL) Metnod 8240 Client Name: Waste Management of North America, Inc. Client ID: GWMW12 Lab ID: 021920 -0003 -SA Matrix: AQUEOUS Sampled: 31 MAR 92 Authorized: 01 APR 92 Prepared: 07 APR 92 Parameter Acetone Benzene Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Bromomethane 2-Butanone (MEK) Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromethane Di bromochloromethane 1,1-Dichloroethane 1,2-Dichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethene 1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 1,2-Dichloropropane cis-1,3-Oichloropropene trans-I,3-Dichloropropene Ethyl benzene 2-Hexanone Methylene chloride 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) Styrene 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane Tetrachloroethene Toluene 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1,1,2-Trichloroethane Trichloroethene Vinyl acetate Vinyl chloride Xylenes (total) Surrogate Toluene -d8 4-Bromofluorobenzene ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Stephanie Boehnke Received: 01 APR 92 Analyzed: 14 APR 92 Reporting Result Units Limit ND NO ug/L 10 L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 10 NO NO g/L 10 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 NO ND g/L 0 10 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 10 ND ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND NO g/L 0 10 ND ug/L 5.0 NO ND ug/L 10 L 5.0 NO ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 10 ND ug/L 10 NO ug/L 5.0 Recovery 102 7. 94 (continued on following page) Approved By: Dave Roberts A Comm! Ca pay 931061 Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Volatile Organics Target Compound List (TCL) Method 8240 Waste Management GWMW12 021920 -0003 -SA AQUEOUS 01 APR 92 Surrogate 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 of North America, Inc. NO - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Stephanie Boehnke Sampled: 31 MAR 92 Prepared: 07 APR 92 Recovery 102 Received: 01 APR 92 Analyzed: 14 APR 9Z Approved.By: Dave Roberts A Cot,, CONS... 931061 • • Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter Chlorinated Pesticides and PCB's Target Compound List (TCL) Method 8080 Waste Management of North America, Inc. GWMW12 021920 -0003 -SA AQUEOUS Sampled: 31 MAR 92 01 APR 92 Prepared: 06 APR 92 gamma-BHC (Lindane) Endrin Methoxychlor Toxaphene Surrogate Dibutyl chlorendate ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Lue tar Received: 01 APR 92 Analyzed: I4 APR 92 Reporting Result Units Limit ND ug/L ND ug/L NI) ug/L ND ug/L Recovery 67 y. 0.050 0.10 0.50 5.0 Approved.By: Karen Kuiken Enseco A caw Cnwe.n, 931061 Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: RCRA Herbicides Method 8150 Waste Management of North America, Inc. GWMW1Z 021920 -0003 -SA AQUEOUS Sampled: 31 MAR 92 Received: 01 APR 92 01 APR 92 Prepared: 06 APR 92 Analyzed: 13 APR 92 Parameter 2,4-D 2,4,5-TP (Silvex) Surrogate DCAA ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Lue Lor Reporting Result Units Limit ND ug/L ND ug/L Recovery 80 1z 1.7 Approved.By: Karen Kuiken A Gimlet Gw.a. 931061 Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter Arsenic Barium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury Potassium Selenium Silver Sodium Waste Management GWMW12 021920 -0003 -SA AQUEOUS 01 APR 92 Metals Dissolved Metals of North America, Inc. Sampled: 31 MAR 92 Received: 01 APR 92 Prepared: See Below Analyzed: See Below Result Units ND mg /L mmg/L 0053 g/L 487 0.012 mg NO /L ND mg/L 771 mg/L 1.1 mg/L NO L 16.1 mg/L NO NO mg/L 490 mg/L ND a Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Will Pratt Reporting Limit 0.010 0.010 0.0050 0.20 0.010 0.10 0.050 0.20 0.010 0.00020 5.0 0.050 0.010 5.0 Analytical Method 7060 6010 6010 6010 6010 6010 7421 6010 6010 7470 6010 7740 6010 6010 Erseco Prepared Analyzed Date Date NA 10 APR 92 NA 07 APR 92 NA 07 APR 92 NA07 07APR PR92 NA NA 07 APR 92 NA 10 APR 92 NA 07 APR 92 NA 07 APR 92 03 APR 92 05 APR 92 NA 07 APR 92 NA 13 APR 92 A 07 APR 92 NA 07 APR 92 Approved By: Debra Hosford 931061 Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Waste Management GWMW1Z 021920 -0003 -SA AQUEOUS 01 APR 92 Parameter Result Alkalinity, Bicarb. as CaCO3 at pH 4.5 562 Alkalinity, Carb. as CaCO3 at pH 8.3 ND Chloride 33.8 Ammonia as N 1.4 Nitrate as N 0.58 Sulfate 4870 ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Steve Pope General Inorganics of North America, Inc. Enseco A Cmnnli Cayman," Sampled: 31 MAR 92 Received: 01 APR 92 Prepared: See Below Analyzed: See Below Reporting Analytical Prepared Analyzed Units Limit Method Date Date mg/L 5.0 310.1 mg/L 5.0 310.1 mg/L 6.0 300.0 mg/L 0.10 350.1 m00.0 mg/0.20 L 125 300.0 NA NA NA NA NA NA Approved By: Blake Besser Cl APR 92 01 APR 92 03 APR 92 06 APR 92 03 APR 92 03 APR 92 931061 Radiochemistry Client Name: Waste Management of North America, Inc. Client ID GWMW12 Lab ID: 021920 -0003 -SA Matrix: AQUEOUS Sampled: 31 MAR 92 Received: 01 APR 92 Authorized: 01 APR 92 Prepared: See Below Analyzed: See Below Reporting Analytical Prepared Analyzed Result Units Limit Method Date Date Parameter A Carmen Caap.a Gross Alpha 5 pCi/L (+-40) 900.0 NA 14 APR 92 Radium 226 1.0 pCi/L (+-0.7) 705 Modified NA 14 APR 92 Gross Beta 0 pCi/L ((+-39) 900.0 NA 14 APR 92 Radium 228 1.4 pCi/L +-1.5) EPA Specified NA 16 APR 92 ND * Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Roxanne Sullivan Approved By: Roxanne Sullivan 931061 • Volatile Organics Target Compound List (TCL) Method 8240 Client Name: Waste Management of North America, Inc. Client ID: GWMW13 Lab ID: 021825 -0002 -SA Matrix: AQUEOUS Sampled: 25 MAR 92 Received: 27 MAR 92 Authorized: 27 MAR 92 Prepared: 31 MAR 92 Analyzed: 06 APR 92 Parameter Result Acetone Benzene Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Bromomethane 2-Butanone (MEK) Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromethane Dibromochloromethane 1,1-Dichloroethane 1,2-Dichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethene 1,2-01chloroethene (total) 1,2-01chloropropane cis-1,3-Dichloropropene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene Ethyl benzene 2-Hexanone Methylene chloride 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) Styrene 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane Tetrachloroethene Toluene 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1,1,2-Trichloroethane Trichloroethene Vinyl acetate Vinyl chloride Xylenes (total) Surrogate Toluene -d8 4-Bromofluorobenzene ND • Not detected NA • Not applicable Reported By: Scott McPhail ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NO ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NO NI) Recovery 102 93 Reporting Units Limit ug/L 10 u 5.0 ug/Lg/L 5.0 ug/L 5.0 ug/L 10 ug/L 10 ug/L 5.0 ug/L 5.0 ug/L 5.0 g/ 10 5.0 ug/L 10 ug/L 5.0 ug/L 5.0 ug/L 5.0 ug/L 5.0 ug/L 5.0 uug/L 5.0 L 5.0 ug/L 5.0 / 5.0 10 ug/L 5.0 ug/L 10 uug/L 5.0 L 5.0 ug/L 5.0 ug/L 5.0 ug/L 5.0 ug/L 5.0 uug//5.0 L 10 ug/L 10 ug/L 5.0 /0 (continued on following page) Approved By: Karen Kuiken A Conimg Campy, 931061 Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix:. Authorized: Volatile Organics Target Compound List (TCL) Method 8240 Waste Management of North America, Inc. GWMW13 021825 -0002 -SA AQUEOUS 27 MAR 92 Surrogate 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Scott McPhail Sampled: 25 MAR 92 Received: 27 MAR 92 Prepared: 31 MAR 92 Analyzed: 06 APR 92 Recovery 91 Approved•By: Karen Kuiken A Cani. C.y11pM, 931061 • r• I • Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix:. Authorized: Parameter Chlorinated Pesticides and PCB's Target Compound List (TCL) Method 8080 Waste Management of North America, Inc. GWMW13 021825 -0002 -SA AQUEOUS Sampled: 25 MAR 92 27 MAR 92 Prepared: 31 MAR 92 gamma-BHC (Lindane) Endrin Methoxychlor Toxaphene Surrogate Dibutyl chlorendate ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Luc Lor Received: 27 MAR 92 Analyzed: 08 APR 92 Reporting Result Units Limit NO NO NO ND ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L Recovery 95 X 0.050 0.10 0.50 5.0 Approved. By: Karen Kuiken Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix:. Authorized: Waste Management GWMW13 021825 -0002 -SA AQUEOUS 27 MAR 92 Parameter 2,4-D 2,4,5-TP (Silvex) Surrogate DCAA NO - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Lue Lor RCRA Herbicides Method 8150 of North America, Inc. Sampled: 25 MAR 92 Prepared: 30 MAR 92 Result Units NO ug/L ND ug/L Recovery 88 Received: 27 MAR 92 Analyzed: 13 APR 92 Reporting Limit 12 Approved. By: Karen Kuiken 1.7 Enseco A Cum.Z C-.q.y 931061 Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix:. Authorized: Parameter Arsenic Barium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury Potassium Selenium Silver Sodium Waste Management GWMWI3 021825 -0002 -SA AQUEOUS 27 MAR 92 Metals Dissolved Metals of North America, Inc. Sampled: 25 MAR 92 Received: 27 MAR 92 Prepared: See Below Analyzed: See Below Reporting Result Units Limit NO /L .026 mg/` ND 387 mg/L N0 9/L NO mg/L NO mg/L 268 mg/L 0.38 mg/L N2mg/ 12.6 L ND mg/L ND mg/L 136 mg/L NO - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Sandra Jones 0.010 0.010 0.0050 0.20 0.010 0.10 0.010 0.20 0.010 0.00020 5.0 0.050 0.010 5.0 Analytical Method 7060 6010 6010 6010 60I0 6010 7421 6010 6010 7470 6010 7740 6010 6010 Approved..6y: Will Pratt A Corn.. Companv Prepared Analyzed Date Date NA 06 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 02 APR. 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 06 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 30 MAR 92 31 MAR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 08 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 931061 Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Waste Management GWMW13 021825 -0002 -SA AQUEOUS 27 MAR 92 Parameter Result Alkalinity, Bicarb. as CaCO3 at pH 4.5 214 Alkalinity, Carb. as CaCO3 at pH 8.3 ND Chloride Ammonia as N Nitrate as N Sulfate 10.6 0.58 0.11 2090 ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Steve Pope General Inorganics of North America, Inc. Erseco Sampled: 25 MAR 92 Received: 27 MAR 92 Prepared: See Below Analyzed: See Below Reporting Analytical Prepared Analyzed Units Limit Method Date Date mg/L 5.0 310.1 mg/L 5.0 310.1 mg/L 3.0 300.0 mg/L 0.10 350.1 mmg/L 0.10 300.0 L 25.0 300.0 Approved By: Blake Besser NA NA NA NA NA NA 27 MAR 92 27 MAR 92 27 MAR 92 30 MAR 92 27 MAR 92 27 MAR 92 931061 I Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter Gross Alpha Radium 226 Gross Beta Radium 228 Radiochemistry Waste Management of North America, Inc. GWMW13 02182S -0002 -SA AQUEOUS Sampled: 25 MAR 92 27 MAR 92 Prepared: See Below Result 16 0.9 33 2.1 NO - Not detected NA a Not applicable Reported By: Ramona Power Reporting Units Limit pCi/L +/- 22 pCi/L +1 6 - 22 pCi/L +/- 1.7 Received: 27 MAR 92 Analyzed: See Below Analytical Method 900.0 705 Modified 900.0 EPA Specified Approved By: Blake Sesser A Gaining Company Prepared Analyzed Date Date NA 09 APR 92 NA 14 APR 92 NA 09 APR 92 NA 09 APR 92 931061 Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Volatile Organics Target Compound List (TCL) Method 8240 Waste Management GWMW8 021837 -0003 -SA AQUEOUS 28 MAR 92 Surrogate 1,2-01chloroethane-d4 of North America, Inc. ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Stephanie Boehnke Sampled: 27 MAR 92 Received: 28 MAR 92 Prepared: 31 MAR 92 Analyzed: 09 APR 92 Recovery 101 Approved•By: Karen Kuiken Enseco A CcmaS c - 931061 Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter Chlorinated Pesticides and PCB's Target Compound List (TCL) Method 8080 Waste Management GWMW8 021837 -0003 -SA AQUEOUS 28 MAR 92 gamma-BHC (Lindane) Endrin Methoxychlor Toxaphene Surrogate Dibutyl chlorendate ND - Not detected NA • Not applicable Reported By: Lue Lor of North America, Inc. Sampled: 27 MAR 92 Prepared: 31 MAR 92 Result Units ND ND ug/L ND L ND ug/L Recovery 85 9. Received: 28 MAR 92 Analyzed: 08 APR 92 Reporting Limit 0.050 0.10 0.50 5.0 Approved.By: Karen Kuiken En �w{ co M� 931061 Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: RCRA Herbicdes Method 8I50 Waste Management of North America, Inc. GWMW-8 022450 -0003 -SA AQUEOUS 29 APR 92 Parameter 2,4-0 2,4,5-TP (Silvex) Surrogate ()CAA NO - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Susan McCool Sampled: 27 APR 92 Prepared: 0 MAY 92 Result ND NO Recovery 89 Received: 29 APR 92 Analyzed: 08 MAY 92 Reporting Units Limit ug/L ug/L 12 1.7 Approved By: Karen Kuiken �o w 931061 Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter Arsenic Barium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury Potassium Selenium Silver Sodium Metals Dissolved Metals Waste Management of North America, Inc. 6WMW8 021837 -0003 -SA AQUEOUS 28 MAR 92 if Enseco A Ca..-' Co.upa.. Sampled: 27 MAR 92 Received: 28 MAR 92 Prepared: See Below Analyzed: See Below Result Units NO mg/L 0.013 ND mg/L 447 mg/L ND mg/L ND mg ND mg/L 639 mg/L 1,7 mg/L ND mg/L 11.2 mg/L NO m NO mg/L 250 mg/L NO - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Sandra Jones Reporting Limit 0.010 0.010 0.0050 0.20 0.010 0.10 0.050 0.20 0.010 0.00020 5.0 0.050 0.010 5.0 Analytical Method 7060 6010 6010 6010 6010 6010 7421 6010 6010 7470 6010 7740 6010 6010 Approved By: Sandra Jones Prepared Analyzed Date Date NA 06 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 06 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 02 92 30 MAR 92 31 MAR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 08 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 02 APR 42 931061 • I Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix:. Authorized: General Inorganics Waste Management of North America, Inc. GWMWB 021837 -0003 -SA AQUEOUS Sampled: 27 MAR 92 Received: 28 MAR 92 28 MAR 92 Prepared: See Below Analyzed: See Below Parameter Result Alkalinity, Bicarb. as CaCO3 at pH 4.5 336 Alkalinity, Carb. as CaCO3 at pH 8.3 Chloride Ammonia as N Nitrate as N Sulfate ND 37.1 ND 7.4 3920 ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Steve Pope A Cats Cynamt Reporting Analytical Prepared Analyzed Units Limit Method Date Date mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L 5.0 310.1 5.0 310.1 3.0 300.0 0.I0 350.1 0.10 300.0 50.0 300.0 Approved..By: Blake Sesser NA NA NA NA NA NA 28 MAR 92 28 MAR 92 28 MAR 92 30 MAR 92 28 MAR 92 28 MAR 92 Radiochemistry Client Name: Waste Management of North America, Inc. Client ID: GWMWB Lab ID: 021837 -0003 -SA Matrix:. AQUEOUS Sampled: 27 MAR 92 Authorized: 28 MAR 92 Prepared: See Below Received: 28 MAR 92 Analyzed: See Below Enseco A CMn.lICOmOmw Reporting Analytical Prepared Analyzed Parameter Result Units Limit Method Date Date Radium 226 0.4 pCi/L (+-0.5) 705 Modified NA 14 APR 92 Gross Alpha 38 pCi/L (+-36) 900.0 NA 14 APR 92 Gross Beta 71 pCi/L ((+-40) 900.0 NA 14 APR 92 Radium 228 1.0 pCi/L +-1.4) EPA Specified NA 16 APR 92 NO - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Ramona Power Approved..By: Roxanne Sullivan 931061 Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter Volatile Organics Target Compound List (TCL) Method 8240 Waste Management of North America, Inc. GWMW9 021920 -0002 -SA AQUEOUS Sampled: 31 MAR 92 01 APR 92 Prepared: 07 APR 92 Acetone Benzene Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Bromomethane 2-Butanone (MEK) Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromethane Dibromochloromethane 1,1-Dichloroethane 1,2-Dichloroethane 1,1-Dichioroethene 1,2-Dichioroethene (total) 1,2-Dichloropropene cis-1,3-Dichloropropene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene Ethyl benzene 2-Hexanone Methylene chloride 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) Styrene 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane Tetrachloroethene Toluene 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1,1,2-Trichloroethane Trichloroethene Vinyl acetate Vinyl chloride Xylenes (total) Surrogate Toluene -d8 4-Bromofluorobenzene ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Stephanie Boehnke Received: 01 APR 92 Analyzed: 14 APR 92 Reporting Result Units Limit ND ug/L 10 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 10 NO ug/L 10 NO ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L ND u/ 5.0 L 10 ND ug/L 5.0 NO NO g/L 10 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 10 ND ug/L 5.0 NNO D ug/L 10 5.0 NO ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ND g/L 10 ND ug/L 5.0 Recovery 101 % 93 % (continued on following page) Approved By: Dave Roberts A C.rn.s Co.w.av 931061 Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Volatile Organics Target Compound List (TCL) Method 8240 Waste Management of North America, Inc. GWMW9 021920 -0002 -SA AQUEOUS 01 APR 92 Surrogate 1,2-Oichloroethane-d4 ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Stephanie Boehnke Sampled: 31 MAR 92 Received: 01 APR 92 Prepared: 07 APR 92 Analyzed: 14 APR 92 Recovery 100 Approved .By: Dave Roberts Enseco A GJA-q C ,p.,, 931061 Enseco Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter Chlorinated Pesticides and PCB's Target Compound List (TCL) Method 8080 Waste Management of North America, Inc. GWMW9 021920 -0002 -SA AQUEOUS Sampled: 31 MAR 92 01 APR 92 Prepared: 06 APR 92 gamma-BHC (Lindane) Endrin Methoxychior Toxaphene Surrogate Dibutyl chlorendate ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Lue Lor Received: 01 APR 92 Analyzed: 14 APR 92 Reporting Result Units Limit ND ug/L ND ug/L NND ug/L Recovery 73 0.050 0.10 0.50 5.0 Approved.By: Karen Kuiken A Cams Campo,. 931061 Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: RCRA Herbicides Method 8150 Waste Management of North America, Inc. GWMW9 021920 -0002 -SA AQUEOUS Sampled: 31 MAR 92 01 APR 92 Prepared: 06 APR 92 Parameter 2,4-0 2,4,5-TP (Silvex) Surrogate DCAA ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Lue Lor Result Units ND ug/L ND ug/L Recovery 86 % Received: 01 APR 92 Analyzed: 13 APR 92 Reporting Limit 12 1.7 Approved.By: Karen Kuiken Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter Arsenic Barium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury Potassium Selenium Silver Sodium Metals Dissolved Metals Waste Management of North America, Inc. GWMW9 021920 -0002 -SA AQUEOUS 01 APR 92 Sampled: 31 MAR 92 Received: 01 APR 92 Prepared: See Below Analyzed: See Below Result Units NO mg/L ND mg/L ND mg/L 374 mg/L ND mg NO mg/L NO mg/L 302 L 0.25 mg/L NO mg/L 9.4 mg/ ND L ND mg/L 187 mg/L NO - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Will Pratt Reporting Analytical Limit Method 0.0050 0.010 0.0050 0.20 0.010 0.10 0.050 0.20 0.010 0.00020 7470 5.0 6010 0.050 7740 0.010 6010 5.0 6010 7060 6010 6010 6010 60I0 6010 7421 6010 6010 A Cwnwnt Gnnpr.• Prepared Analyzed Date Date NA 10 APR 92 NA 07 APR 92 NA 07 APR 92 NA 07 APR 92 NA 07 APR 92 NA 07 APR 92 NA 10 APR 92 NA 07 APR 92 NA 07 APR 92 03 APR 92 05 APR 92 NA 07 APR 92 NA 13 APR 92 NA 07 APR 92 NA 07 APR 92 Approved By: Debra Hosford 931061 Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: General Inorganics Waste Management of North America, Inc. GWMW9 021920 -0002 -SA AQUEOUS Sampled: 31 MAR 92 01 APR 92 Prepared: See Below Parameter Result Alkalinity, 8icarb. as CaCO3 at pH 4.5 402 Alkalinity, Carb. as CaCO3 at pH 8.3 NO Chloride 15.4 Ammonia a:: N 0.28 Nitrate as N ND Sulfate 2130 ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Steve Pope Received: 01 APR 92 Analyzed: See Below Enseco A CJM.Z Company Reporting Analytical Prepared Analyzed Units Limit Method Date Date mg/L 5.0 310.1 NA 01 APR 92 mg/L 5.0 310.1 NA 01 APR 92 mg/L 3.0 300.0 NA 03 APR 92 mg/L 0.10 350.1 NA 06 APR 92 mg/L 0.10 300.0 NA 03 APR 92 mg/L 50.0 300.0 NA 03 APR 92 Approved By: Blake Sesser 931061 Radiochemistry Client Name: Waste Management of North America, Inc. Client ID: GWMW9 Lab ID: 021920 -0002 -SA Matrix: AQUEOUS Sampled: 31 MAR 92 Authorized: 01 APR 92 Prepared: See Below Parameter Received: 01 APR 92 Analyzed: See Below Enseco A Cans Canwnv Reporting Analytical Prepared Analyzed Result Units Limit Method Elate Date Radium 226 2.1 pCi/L +-1.1) 705 Modified NA 14 APR 92 Gross Alpha 41 pCi/L +-24) 900.0 NA 14 APR 92 Gross Beta 25 pCi/L +-20) 900.0 NA 14 APR 92 Radium 228 2.7 pCi/L +-1.4) EPA Specified NA 16 APR 92 NO - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Roxanne Sullivan Approved By: Roxanne Sullivan 931061 Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter Volatile Organics Target Compound List (TCL) Method 8240 Waste Management of North America, Inc. GWMW10 021782 -0002 -SA AQUEOUS Sampled: 25 MAR 92 25 MAR 92 Prepared: 26 MAR 92 Acetone Benzene Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Bromomethane 2-Butanone (MEK) Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromethane Dibromochloromethane 1,1-Oichloroethane 1,2-Dichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethene 1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 1,2-Dichloropropene cis-1,3-Dichloropropene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene Ethyl benzene 2-Hexanone Methylene chloride 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) Styrene 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane Tetrachloroethene Toluene 1,1,1-Trichloroethane I,I,2-Trichloroethane Trichloroethene Vinyl acetate Vinyl chloride Xylenes (total) Surrogate Toluene -d8 4-Bromofluorobenzene ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Scott McPhail Received: 25 MAR 92 Analyzed: 06 APR 92 Reporting Result Units Limit NO ug/L 10 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND L 10 ND ug/L 10 NO ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 10 NO ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 10 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 NO 5.0 NO ug/Lg/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 10 NO ug/L 5.0 ND NO ug/L 10 I 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 10 ND NO ug/L 10 I 5.0 Recovery 100 % 93 (continued on following page) Approved/By: Karen Kuiken Enseco A Gn.K Cumpan• 931061 Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Volatile Organics Target Compound List (TCL) Method 8240 Waste Management GWMW10 021782 -0002 -SA AQUEOUS 25 MAR 92 Surrogate 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Scott McPhail of North America, Inc. Sampled: 25 MAR 92 Received: 25 MAR 92 Prepared: 26 MAR 92 Analyzed: 06 APR 92 Recovery 89 Approved By: Karen Kuiken A Co c,..,,.,. 931061 III Client Name Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: • Chlorinated Pesticides and PCB's Target Compound List (TCL) Method 8080 : Waste Management of North America, Inc. GWMW10 021782 -0002 -SA AQUEOUS Sampled: 25 MAR 92 25 MAR 92 Prepared: 31 MAR 92 Parameter gamma-BHC (Lindane) Endrin Methoxychlor Toxaphene Surrogate Dibutyl chiorendate NO - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Lue Lor Result ND ND ND NO Recovery Received: 25 MAR 92 Analyzed: 07 APR 92 Reporting Units Limit ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L 71 Y. 0.050 0.10 0.50 5.0 Approved By: Karen Kuiken A Cant( Company 931061 III Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Waste Management GWMW10 02I782 -0002 -SA AQUEOUS 25 MAR 92 Parameter 2,4-0 2,4,5-TP (Silvex) Surrogate DCAA ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Lue Lor RCRA Herbicides Method 8150 of North America, Inc. Sampled: 25 MAR 92 Prepared: 30 MAR 9Z Result Units ND ug/L ND ug/L Recovery 61 Received: 25 MAR 92 Analyzed: 13 APR 92 Reporting Limit 12 1.7 Approved By: Karen Kuiken Enseco 931061 • • • Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter Arsenic Barium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury Potassium Selenium Silver Sodium Waste Management GWMW10 021782 -0002 -SA AQUEOUS 25 MAR 92 Metals Dissolved Metals of North America, Inc. Sampled: 25 MAR 92 Prepared: See Below Result Units ND mg/L 0.025 mg/L NO 432 mg/L ND mg/L 0.27 mg/L NO mg/L 487 mg/L 0.37 mg/L ND mg/ 17.6 L ND ND mg/L 150 mg/L ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Sandra Jones Reporting Limit 0.010 0.010 0.0050 0.20 0.010 0.10 0.010 0.20 0.010 0.00020 5.0 0.10 0.010 5.0 Received: 25 MAR 92 Analyzed: See Below Analytical Method 7060 6010 6010 6010 6010 6010 7421 6010 6010 7470 6010 7740 6010 6010 Approved_By: Sandra Jones Enseco Ca Y,. Prepared Analyzed Date Date NA 06 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 06 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 30 MAR 92 31 MAR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 08 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 931061 Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Waste Management GWMW1O 021782 -0002 -SA AQUEOUS 25 MAR 92 Parameter Result Alkalinity, Bicarb. as CaCO3 at pH 4.5 934 Alkalinity, Carb. as CaCO3 at pH 8.3 ND Chloride 22.6 Ammonia as N 0.69 Nitrate as N 0.11 Sulfate 2890 NO - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Steve Pope General Inorganics of North America, Inc. Enseco AC i uM Ca.9sw Sampled: 25 MAR 92 Received: 25 MAR 92 Prepared: See Below Analyzed: See Below Reporting Analytical Prepared Analyzed Units Limit Method Date Date mg/L mmg/L mg/L mmg/L 5.0 310.1 5.0 310.1 3.0 300.0 0.10 350.1 0.10 300.0 50.0 300.0 Approved By: Blake Sesser NA NA NA NA NA NA 26 MAR 92 26 MAR 92 26 MAR 92 30 MAR 92 26 MAR 92 26 MAR 92 931061 • :Bent Name Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter Gross Alpha Radium 226 Gross Beta Radium 228 : Waste Management GWMW10 021782 -0002 -SA AQUEOUS 25 MAR 92 Result 49 2.9 28 3.4 ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Roxanne Sullivan Radiochemistry of North America, Inc. Sampled: 25 MAR 92 Prepared: See Below Reporting Units Limit pCi/L +-34) pCi/L +-1.0) pCi/L +-32) pCi/L +-1.5) Received: 25 MAR 92 Analyzed: See Below Analytical Method 900.0 705 Modified 900.0 EPA Specified A Comm(CAW." Prepared Analyzed Date Date NA 07 APR 92 NA 08 APR 92 NA 07 APR 92 NA 07 APR 92 Approved By: Roxanne Sullivan 931061 o Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter Volatile Organics Target Compound List (TCL) Method 8240 Waste Management of North America, Inc. GWMW11 021825 -0007 -SA AQUEOUS Sampled: 26 MAR 92 Received: 27 MAR 92 27 MAR 92 Prepared: 31 MAR 92 Analyzed: 06 APR 92 Acetone Benzene Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Bromomethane 2-Butanone (MEK) Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromethane Dibromochloramethane 1,1-Dichlaroethane 1,2-Dichloroethane 1,I-Oichioroethene 1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 1,2- ichloropropane cis-1,3-Dichloropropene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene Ethyl benzene 2-Hexanone Methylene chloride 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (M18K) Styrene I.1,2,2-Tetrachioroethane Tetrachloroethene Toluene 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1,1,2-Trichloroethane Trichloroethene Vinyl acetate Vinyl chloride Xylenes (total) Surrogate Toluene -d8 4-Bromofluorobenzene ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Scott McPhail Reporting Result Units Limit NO ug/L 10 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 10 ND ug/L 10 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 10 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 10 NO ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND g ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 10 ND ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 10 ND 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 10 NO ug/L 10 ND ug/L 5.0 Recovery 102 7. 97 X (continued on following page) Approved By: Karen Kuiken Enseco A c.NMI{ c.-.p,fl. Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix:. Authorized: Volatile Organics Target Compound List (TCL) Method 8240 Waste Management of North America, Inc. GWMW11 021825 -0007 -SA AQUEOUS 27 MAR 92 Surrogate 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Scott McPhail Sampled: 26 MAR 92 Received: 27 MAR 92 Prepared: 31 MAR 92 Analyzed: 06 APR 92 Recovery 89 Approved:By: Karen Kuiken A Carroll' cyn.r,,, 931061 Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter Chlorinated Pesticides and PCB's Target Compound List (TCL) Method 8080 Waste Management of North America, Inc. GWMW11 021825 -0007 -SA AQUEOUS Sampled: 26 MAR 92 27 MAR 92 Prepared: 31 MAR 92 gamma-BHC (Lindane) Endrin Methoxychlor Toxaphene Surrogate Dibutyl chlorendate ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Lue Lor ND NO ND Recovery Received: 27 MAR 92 Analyzed: 08 APR 92 Reporting Result Units Limit ug/L 0.050 ug/L 0.10 L 0.50 ug/L 5.0 92 Approved By: Karen Kuiken A C nua CuMpallY 931061 Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: RCRA Herbicides Method 8150 Waste Management of North America, Inc. GWMW11 021825 -0007 -SA AQUEOUS Sampled: 26 MAR 92 27 MAR 92 Prepared: 30 MAR 92 Parameter 2.4-D 2,4,5-TP (Silvex) Surrogate DCAA ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Lue Lor Result ND ND Recovery Units ug/L ug/L 77 7. Received: 27 MAR 92 Analyzed: 14 APR 92 Reporting Limit 12 Approved By: Karen Kuiken 1.7 A CAIM.I C.MAWAv 931061 • • Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter Arsenic Barium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury Potassium Selenium Silver Sodium Metals Dissolved Metals Waste Management of North America, Inc. GWMW11 021825 -0007 -SA AQUEOUS 27 MAR 92 Sampled: 26 MAR 92 Received: 27 MAR 92 Prepared: See Below Analyzed: See Below Result Units N0.014 mg/mg/L NO mg/L 452 mg/L NO mg/L 0.27 mg/L ND mg/L 473 0.88 mg/L ND mg/L 9.9 mg/L ND mg/L ND mg /L m9/L ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Sandra Jones Reporting Analytical Limit Method 0.0050 7060 0.010 6010 0.0050 6010 0.20 6010 0.010 6010 0.10 6010 0.050 7421 0.20 6010 0.010 6010 0.00020 7470 5.0 6010 0.10 7740 0.010 6010 5.0 6010 Approved.By: Will Pratt A C, -...n1 Gn.p.n! Prepared Analyzed Date Date NA 06 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 06 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 30 MAR 92 31 MAR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 08 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 931061 • Client Name: Waste Management Client ID: GWMW11 Lab ID: 021825 -0007 -SA Matrix:. AQUEOUS Authorized: 27 MAR 92 Parameter Result Alkalinity, Bicarb. as CaCO3 at pH 4.5 254 Alkalinity, Carb. as CaCO3 at pH 8.3 ND Chloride 25.7 Ammonia as N 0.49 Nitrate as N 0.14 Sulfate 3570 ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Steve Pope General Inorganics of North America, Inc. A Comae Cop.. Sampled: 26 MAR 92 Received: 27 MAR 92 Prepared: See Below Analyzed: See Below Reporting Analytical Prepared Analyzed Units Limit Method Date Date mg/L 5.0 310.I mg/L 5.0 310.1 mg/L 3.0 300.0 mg/L 0.%;0 350.1 mg/L 0.:0 300.0 mg/L 50.0 300.0 Approved By: Blake Besser NA NA NA NA NA NA 27 MAR 92 27 MAR 92 27 MAR 92 30 MAR 92 27 MAR 92 27 MAR 92 931061 Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix:. Authorized: Parameter Volatile Organics Target Compound List (TCL) Method 8240 Waste Management of North America, Inc. GWMW14 021825 -0004 -SA AQUEOUS Sampled: 26 MAR 92 27 MAR 92 Prepared: 31 MAR 92 Acetone Benzene Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Bromomethane 2-Butanone (MEK) Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromethane Dibramochloromethane 1,1-Dichloroethane 1,2-Dichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethene 1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 1,2-Dichioropropane cis-1,3-Dichloropropene trans-l.3-Dichloropropene Ethylbenzene 2-Hexanone Methylene chloride 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIRK) Styrene 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane Tetrachloroethene Toluene 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1,1,2-Trichloroethane Trichloroethene Vinyl acetate Vinyl chloride Xylenes (total) Surrogate Toluene -d8 4-Bromofluorobenzene ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Scott McPhail Received: 27 MAR 92 Analyzed: 06 APR 92 Reporting Result Units Limit ND ug/L 10 ND L 5.0 NO ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND 9 u L 10 ND ug/L 10 ND ND ug/I 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 10 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 10 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 10 ND ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 10 NO ND ug/L 5.0 ND ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ND ug/5.0 L 10 ND ug/L 10 ND ug/L 5.0 Recovery 101 X 95 (continued on following page) Approved By: Karen Kuiken A fprow` Cps„,, 931061 a Volatile Organics Target Compound List (TCL) Method 8240 Client Name: Waste Management of North America, Inc. Client ID: GWMW14 Lab ID: 021825 -0004 -SA Matrix: ApUEOUS Sampled: 26 MAR 92 Received: 27 MAR 92 Authorized: 27 MAR 92 Prepared: 31 MAR 92 Analyzed: 06 APR 92 Surrogate 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 NO - Not detected NA • Not applicable Reported By: Scott McPhail Recovery 95 X Approved•By: Karen Kuiken A C—.' Gffman. 931061 Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter Chlorinated Pesticides and PCB's Target Compound List (TCL) Method 8080 Waste Management of North America, Inc. GWMW14 021825 -0004 -SA AQUEOUS Sampled: 26 MAR 92 27 MAR 92 Prepared: 31 MAR 92 gamma-BHC (Lindane) Endrin Methoxych1or Toxaphene Surrogate Dibutyl chlorendate ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Lue Lor Result Units ND ND ug/L ND ug/L ND ug/L Recovery 95 ". Received: 27 MAR 92 Analyzed: 08 APR 92 Reporting Limit 0.050 0.10 0.50 5.0 Approved. By: Karen Kuiken Enseco A Corn.. Caw .a r 931061 Enseco Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: RCRA Herbicides Method 8150 Waste Management of North America, Inc. GWMW-14 022450 -0007 -SA AQUEOUS Sampled: 28 APR 92 29 APR 92 Prepared: 01 MAY 9Z Parameter 2,4-0 2,4,5-TP (Silvex) Surrogate DCAA ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Susan McCool Result NO NO Recovery 86 Received: 29 APR 92 Analyzed: 08 MAY 92 Reporting Units Limit ug/L ug/L 1Z 1.7 Approved By: Karen Kuiken ACnt% Ca,.a. 931061 • • Client Name Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter Arsenic Barium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury Potassium Selenium Silver Sodium Metals Dissolved Metals : Waste Management of North America, 6WMW14 021825 -0004 -SA AQUEOUS 27 MAR 92 Inc. Sampled: 26 MAR 92 Received: 27 MAR 92 Prepared: See Below Analyzed: See Below Result Units NO mg/L ND ND mg/L L 392 L ND mg/L 0.87 mg/L NO mg/L 339 /L 0.90 mg/L ND 8.6 mg/L ND mg/L ND mg/L 165 mg/L ND - Not detected NA • Not applicable Reported By: Sandra Jones Reporting Limit 0.010 0.010 0.0050 0.20 0.010 0.10 0.050 0.20 0.010 0.00020 5.0 0.10 0.010 5.0 Analytical Method 7060 6010 6010 6010 6010 6010 7421 6010 6010 7470 6010 7740 6010 6010 Approved.8y: Will Pratt A Co.'..' Canvey, Prepared Analyzed Date Date NA 06 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 06 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 02 APR 92 30 MAR 92 31 MAR 92 NA 02 APR 92 NA 08 APR 92 NA 02 APR 52 NA 02 APR 92 931061 Client Name: Client 10: Lab ID: Matrix:. Authorized: General Inorganics Waste Management of North America, Inc. GWMW14 021825 -0004 -SA AQUEOUS Sampled: 26 MAR 92 Received: 27 MAR 92 27 MAR 92 Prepared: See Below Analyzed: See Below Parameter Result Alkalinity, Bicarb. as CaCO3 at pH 4.5 216 Alkalinity, Garb. as CaCO3 at pH 8.3 ND Chloride 17.1 Ammonia as N 0.43 Nitrate as N 0.12 Sulfate 2990 ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Steve Pope Units mg/L r g/L mg/L mg/L mmg/L A C nn, Co-nprw Reporting Analytical Prepared Analyzed Limit Method Date Oate 5.0 3I0.1 5.0 310.1 3.0 300.0 0.10 350.1 0.10 300.0 50.0 300.0 NA NA NA NA NA NA Approved By: Blake Sesser 27 MAR 92 27 MAR 92 27 MAR 92 30 MAR 92 27 MAR 92 Z7 MAR 92 931061 Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix:. Authorized: Parameter Radium 226 Gross Alpha Gross Beta Radium 228 Waste Management GWMW14 021825 -0004 -SA AQUEOUS 27 MAR 92 Result 1.1 11 17 0.2 ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Ramona Power Radiochemistry of North America, Inc. Sampled: 26 MAR 92 Received: 27 MAR 92 Prepared: See Below Analyzed: See Below Reporting Analytical Units Limit Method pCi/L +/- 0.7 705 Modified pCi/L +/- 26 900.0 pCi/L +/- 25 900.0 pCi/L +/- ;:.2 EPA Specified A C-.-, CwigrMI Prepared Analyzed Date Date NA 14 APR 92 NA 09 PR 92 NA 09 APR 92 NA 09 APR 92 Approved 8y: Blake Besser 931061 Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter Volatile Organics Target Compound List (TCL) Method 8240 Waste Management of North America, Inc. N -Discharge 021837 -0004 -SA AQUEOUS Sampled: 27 MAR 92 28 MAR 92 Prepared: 31 MAR 92 Acetone Benzene Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Bromomethane 2-Butanone (MEK) Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromethane Dibromochloromethane 1,1-Dichloroethane 1,2-Dichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethene 1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 1,2 ichloropropane cis-1,3-Dichloropropene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene Ethyl benzene 2-Hexanone Methylene chloride 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) Styrene 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane Tetrach1oroethene Toluene 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1,1,2-Trichloroethane Trichloroethene Vinyl acetate Vinyl chloride Xylenes (total) Surrogate Toluene -d8 4-Bromofluorobenzene ND - Not detected NA • Not applicable Reported By: Stephanie Boehnke Received: 2S MAR 92 Analyzed: 09 APR 92 Reporting Result Units Limit ND ug/L 10 ND ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 10 ND ug/L 10 ND ND ug/t 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 NO NO g/L 10 5.0 NO ug/L 10 ND ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 5.0 ND ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug 5.0 L 10 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 10 ND ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 NO L 10 ND ug/L 10 ND ug/L 5.0 Recovery 106 % 97 % (continued on following page) Approved By: Karen Kuiken A Cant Cans,. 931%1 • • • Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix:' Authorized: Volatile Organics Target Compound List (TCL) Method 8240 Waste Management N -Discharge 02.1837 -0004 -SA AQUEOUS 28 MAR 92 Surrogate 1,2-0i chl oroethane-d4 of North America, Inc. ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Stephanie Boehnke Sampled: 27 MAR 92 Prepared: 31 MAR 92 Recovery 99 % Received: 28 MAR 92 Analyzed: 09 APR 92 Approved• By: Karen Kuiken Enseco A CornensCassav Chlorinated Pesticides and PCB's Target Compound List (TCL) Method 8080 Client Name: Waste Management of North America, Inc. Client ID: N -Discharge Lab ID: 021837 -0004 -SA Matrix:. AQUEOUS Sampled: 27 MAR 92 Authorized: 28 MAR 92 Prepared: 31 MAR 92 Parameter gamma-BHC (Lindane) Endrin Methoxychlor Toxaphene Surrogate Dibutyl chlorendate ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Lue Lor Result Units ND ug/L ND ugh . ND ug/L Recovery 88 Received: 28 MAR 92 Analyzed: 08 APR 92 Reporting Limit 0.050 0.10 0.50 5.0 Approved By: Karen Kuiken A Cams eanowv 931061 Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter Waste Management N -Discharge 021837 -0004 -SA AQUEOUS 28 MAR 92 2,4-0 2,4,S-TP (Silvex) Surrogate DCAA NO - Not detected NA • Not applicable Reported By: Lue Lor RCRA Herbicides Method 8150 of North America, Inc. Sampled: 27 MAR 92 Prepared: 30 MAR 92 Result ND NO Received: 28 MAR 92 Analyzed: 13 APR 92 Reporting Units Limit 12 ug/L 1.7 Recovery 92 y. Approved By: Karen Kuiken A Cowan Cantina. . 931061 Metals Total Metals Client Name: Waste Management of North America, Inc. Client ID: N -Discharge Lab ID: 021837 -0004 -SA Matrix:. AQUEOUS Sampled: 27 MAR 92 Received: 28 MAR 92 Authorized: 28 MAR 92 Prepared: See Below Analyzed: See Below Parameter Arsenic Barium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury Potassium Selenium Silver Sodium Result Units NO 0.016 mg/` NO 409 mgND mg/L 0.24 mg/L ND 217g/L 0.17 g/ ND m L NO mg/L ND NO mg/L 91.3 mg/L ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Sandra Jones Reporting Analytical Limit Method 0.010 0.010 0.0050 0.20 0.010 0.10 0..010 0,.20 0.010 6010 0.00020 7470 5.0 6010 0.050 7740 0.010 6010 5.0 6010 7060 6010 6010 6010 6010 6010 7421 6010 A CY,M{ C.-,... Prepared Analyzed Date Date 30 MAR 92 02 APR 92 30 MAR 92 31 MAR 92 30 MAR 92 31 MAR 92 30 MAR 92 31 MAR 92 30 MAR 92 31 MAR 92 30 MAR 92 31 MAR 92 30 MAR 92 02 APR 92 30 MAR 92 31 MAR 92 30 MAR 92 31 MAR 92 30 MAR 92 31 MAR 92 30 MAR 92 31 MAR 92 30 MAR 92 01 APR 92 30 MAR 92 31 MAR 92 30 MAR 92 31 MAR 92 Approved. By: Sandra Jones 931%1 Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: General Inorganics Waste Management of North America, Inc. N -Discharge 021837 -0004 -SA AQUEOUS 28 MAR 92 Parameter Result Alkalinity, Bicarb. as CaCO3 at pH 4.5 338 Alkalinity, Carb. as CaCO3 at pH 8.3 ND Chloride 33.3 Ammonia as N ND Nitrate as N 15.9 Sulfate 1720 ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Steve Pope Sampled: 27 MAR 92 Received: 28 MAR 92 Prepared: See Below Analyzed: See Below Units mg/L mg/L mq/L mmg/L mg/L Reporting Analytical Limit Method 5.0 310.2 5.0 310.1 3.0 300.0 0.10 350.1 0.10 300.0 25.0 300.0 EnSeco A Cam -w Cs nn.W Prepared Analyzed Date Date NA NA NA NA NA NA Approved.By: Blake Besser 28 MAR 92 28 MAR 92 28 MAR 92 30 MAR 92 28 MAR 92 28 MAR 92 931061 Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix:' Authorized: Parameter Gross Alpha Radium 226 Gross Beta Radium 228 Radiochemistry Waste Management of North America, Inc. N -Discharge 021837 -0004 -SA AQUEOUS Sampled: 27 MAR 92 28 MAR 92 Prepared: See Below Result 15 0.0 14 0.3 ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Ramona Power Units pci/L pCi/L pci/L pCi/L Received: 28 MAR 92 Analyzed: See Below Reporting Analytical ' Limit Method 1+-20) +-0.3) +-20) +-1.3) 900.0 705 Modified 900.0 EPA Specified Enseco A Gam Car. Prepared Analyzed Date Date NA 14 APR 92 14 APR 92 NA 14 APR 92 NA 16 APR 92 Approved•By: Roxanne Sullivan 931061 Volatile Organics Target Compoun' List (TCL) Method 8240 Client Name: Waste Management of North America, Inc. Client ID: RP -Inlet Lab ID: 021837 -0005 -SA Matrix: AQUEOUS Sampled: 26 MAR 92 Authorized: 28 MAR 92 Prepared: 31 MAR 92 Parameter Acetone Benzene Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Bromomethane 2-Butanone (MEK) Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromethane Di bromochloromethane 1,1-Dichloroethane 1,2-Dichloroethane I,I-Dichloroethene 1,2-Dichloroethene (total) I,2-Dichloropropane cis-1,3-Dichloropropene trans-1,3-0ichloropropene Ethylbenzene 2-Hexanone Methylene chloride 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIRK) Styrene 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane Tetrachloroethene Toluene 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1,1,2-Trichloroethane Trichloroethene Vinyl acetate Vinyl chloride Xylenes (total) Surrogate Toluene -d8 4-Bromofluorobenzene Result Units Received: 28 MAR 92 Analyzed: 06 APR 92 Reporting Limit NO ug/L 10 ND ND ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 10 ND ug/L 10 NO ND ug/L 5.0 ND ugh!. 5.0 ND ug/L 10 NO ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 10 ND ug/L 5.0 ND L 5.0 NO ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 NO ND ug/L 5.0 L IO ND ug/L 5.0 ND NO g/ 10 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 10 ND ug/L 10 ND ug/L 5.0 Recovery 103 % 94 % (continued on following page) ND - Not detected NA • Not applicable Reported By: Scott McPhail Approved By: Karen Kuiken Enseco A C.-.ns may..... 931061 Client Name: Client I0: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Volatile Organics Target Compound List (TCL) Method 8240 Waste Management RP -Inlet 021837 -0005 -SA AQUEOUS 28 MAR 92 Surrogate 1,Z-Dichioroethane-d4 ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Scott McPhail of North America, Inc. Sampled: 26 MAR 92 Prepared: 31 MAR 92 Recovery 93 x Received: 28 MAR 92 Analyzed: 06 APR 92 Approved. By: Karen Kuiken A Cat C1nnpr,. 931061 Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Chlorinated Pesticides and PCB's Target Compound List (TCL) Method 8080 Waste Management of North America, Inc. RP -Inlet 021837 -0005 -SA AQUEOUS Sampled: 26 MAR 92 28 MAR 92 Prepared: 31 MAR 92 Parameter ganima-BHC (Lindane) Endrin Methoxychior Toxaphene Surrogate Dibutyl chlorendate ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported Sy: Lue Lor Received: 28 MAR 92 Analyzed: 08 APR 92 Reporting Result Units Limit ND ND ug/L ND ug/L ND ug%L Recovery 87 % 0.050 0.10 0.50 5.0 Approved_By: Karen Kuiken A cannon% Conpinv 931%1 Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: RCRA Herbicides Method 8150 Waste Management of North America, Inc. RP -Inlet 022450 -0005 -SA AQUEOUS Sampled: 27 APR 92 29 APR 92 Prepared: 01 MAY 9Z Parameter 2,4-0 2,4,5-TP (Silvex) Surrogate OCAA ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Susan McCool Result NO NO Recovery 83 X Received: 29 APR 92 Analyzed: 08 MAY 92 Reporting Units Limit ug/L ug/L 12 1.7 Approved By: Karen Kuiken Enseco A Consoft cv 931061 Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter Arsenic Barium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury Potassium Selenium Silver Sodium Metals Total Metals Waste Management of North America, RP -Inlet 021837 -0005 -SA AQUEOUS 28 MAR 92 Inc. Sampled: 26 MAR 9Z Received: 28 MAR 92 Prepared: See Below Analyzed: See Below Result Units NO 0.032 mg/L ND 243 mg/L ND mg/L 0.41 mg/L ND mg/L 143 mg/L 0.044 mg/L ND mg/L ND mg/L ND mg/L ND mg/L 102 mg/L NO - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Sandra Jones Reporting Analytical Limit Method 0.010 7060 0.010 6010 0.0050 6010 0.20 6010 0.010 6010 0.10 6010 0.010 7421 0.20 6010 0.010 6010 0.00020 7470 5.0 6010 0.020 7740 0.010 6010 5.0 6010 aACaennaCompon. Prepared Analyzed Date Date 30 MAR 92 02 APR 92 30 MAR 92 31 MAR 92 30 MAR 92 31 MAR 92 30 MAR 92 31 MAR 92 30 MAR 92 31 MAR 92 30 MAR 92 31 MAR 92 30 MAR 92 02 APR 92 30 MAR 92 31 MAR 92 30 MAR 92 31 MAR 92 30 MAR 92 31 MAR 92 30 MAR 92 31 MAR 92 30 MAR 92 01 APR 92 30 MAR 92 31 MAR 92 30 MAR 92 31 MAR 92 Approved,By: Sandra Jones 931061 General Inorganics Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter Waste Management of North America, Inc. RP -Inlet 021837 -0005 -SA AQUEOUS 28 MAR 92 Sampled: 26 MAR 92 Received: 28 MAR 92 Prepared: See Below Analyzed: See Below Reporting Analytical Prepared Analyzed Result Units Limit Method Date Date Alkalinity, Bicarb. as CaCO3 at pH 4.5 226 Alkalinity, Garb. as CaCO3 at pH 8.3 NO Chloride 23.0 Ammonia as N NO Nitrate as N 6.1 Sulfate 1290 NO - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Steve Pope mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mmg/L L 5.0 310.1 5.0 310.1 3.0 300.0 0.10 350.1 0.10 300.0 25.0 300.0 NA NA NA NA NA NA Approved..By: Blake Besser 28 MAR 92 28 MAR 92 28 MAR 92 30 MAR 92 28 MAR 92 28 MAR 92 931061 Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter Radium 226 Gross Alpha Gross Beta Radium 228 Radiochemistry Waste Management of North America, Inc. RP -Inlet 021837 -0005 -SA AQUEOUS 28 MAR 92 Prepared: See Below Sampled: 26 MAR 92 Received: 28 MAR 92 Analyzed: See Below Reporting Analytical Result Units Limit Method 0.3 pCi/L +-0.5) 32 pCi/L +-1& 16 pCi/L +-1Z 0.7 pCi/L +-1.4) ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Ramona Power 705 Modified 900.0 900.0 EPA Specified A Ca..A( Ca -.w Prepared Analyzed Date Date NA 14 APR 92 NA 14 APR 92 NA 14 APR 92 NA 16 APR 92 Approved. By: Roxanne Sullivan 931061 Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter Volatile Organics Target Compound List (TCL) Method 8240 Waste Management of North America, Inc. LF-UD 021825 -0005 -SA AQUEOUS Sampled: 26 MAR 92 Received: 27 MAR 92 27 MAR 92 Prepared: 31 MAR 92 Analyzed: 06 APR 92 Acetone Benzene Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Bromomethane 2-Butanone (MEK) Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromethane Dibromochloromethane 1,1-Dichloroethane 1,2-Dichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethene 1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 1,2-Dichloropropane Cis-1,3-Dichloropropene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene Ethyl benzene 2-Hexanone Methylene chloride 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) Styrene 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane Tetrachloroethene Toluene 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1,1,2-Trichloroethane Trichloroethene Vinyl acetate Vinyl chloride Xylenes (total) Surrogate Toluene -d8 4-Bromofluorobenzene ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Scott McPhail Reporting Result Units Limit NO ug/L ND L ND ug/L ND L ND ug/L ND u9/L ND ug/L ND ug/L ND ug/L ND ug/L ND ug/L ND ug/L ND ug/L 5.4 ug/L ND ug/L ND ug/L ND ug/L ND ug/L ND ug/L NO L ND ug/L ND L ND ug/L ND L ND ug/L g ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L ND ug/L NO ug/L ND ug/L ND NO ug/L ND ug/L Recovery 101 94 (continued on following page) 10 5.0 5.0 5.0 10 10 5.0 5.0 5.0 10 5.0 10 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 10 5.0 10 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 10 10 5.0 ApprovediBy: Karen Kuiken A Comes Ca. .my 931061 Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Volatile Organics Target Compound List (TCL) Method 8240 Waste Management LF-UD 021825 -000S -SA AQUEOUS 27 MAR 92 Surrogate 1,2-Dichloraethane-d4 NO - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Scott McPhail of North America, Inc. Sampled: 26 MAR 92 Received: 27 MAR 92 Prepared: 31 MAR 92 Analyzed: 06 APR 92 Recovery 88 Approved.•By: Karen Kuiken Enseco A Coning Gnaw 931061 Chlorinated Pesticides and PCB's Target Compound List (7CL) Method 8080 Client Name: Waste Management of North America, Inc. Client ID: LF-UD Lab ID: 021825 -0005 -SA Matrix: AQUEOUS Sampled: 26 MAR 92 Authorized: 27 MAR 92 Prepared: 31 MAR 92 Parameter gamma-BHC (Lindane) Endrin Methoxychlor Toxaphene Surrogate Oibutyl chlorendate ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Lue Lor Result Units NO NO ug/L L ND ug/L ND g/L Recovery 95 7. Received: 27 MAR 92 Analyzed: 08 APR 92 Reporting Limit 0.050 0.I0 0.50 5.0 Approved.By: Karen Kuiken Enseco A can.nR cu-p.n. 931061 Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: RCRA Herbicides Method 8150 Waste Management of North America, Inc. Lf -UD 022450 -0004 -SA AQUEOUS 29 APR 92 Parameter 2,4-0 2,4,S -7P (Silvex) Surrogate °CAA ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Susan McCool Sampled: 27 APR 92 Prepared: 01 MAY 92 Result Units NO uq/L ND ug/l Recovery 96 Received: 29 APR 92 Analyzed: 08 MAY 92 Reporting Limit 12 1.7 Approved By: Karen Kuiken Ef'necO �....s� Ai �nITOM� 931061 S. D• Metals Total Metals Enseco A Gw�C, Client Name: Waste Management of North America, Inc. Client ID: LF-UD Lab ID: 021825 -0005 -SA Matrix:. AQUEOUS Sampled: 26 MAR 92 Received: 27 MAR 92 Authorized: 27 MAR 92 Prepared: See Below Analyzed: See Below Reporting Analytical Prepared Analyzed Parameter Result Units Limit Method Date Date Arsenic ND mg/L 0.010 7060 30 MAR 92 02 APR 92 Barium 0.010 mg/L 0.010 60I0 30 MAR 92 31 MAR 92 Cadmium NO mg/L 0.0050 6010 30 MAR 92 31 MAR 92 Calcium 432 mg/L 0.20 6010 30 MAR 92 31 MAR 92 Chromium ND mg/L 0.010 6010 30 MAR 92 31 MAR 92 Iron 0.26 mg/L 0.10 6010 30 MAR 92 31 MAR 92 Lead NO mg/L 0.010 7421 30 MAR 92 02 APR 92 Magnesium 292 mg/L 0.20 6010 30 MAR 92 31 MAR 92 Manganese 1.5 mg/L 0.010 6010 30 MAR 92 31 MAR 92 Mercury ND mg/L 0.00020 7470 30 MAR 92 31 MAR 92 Potassium NO mg/L 5.0 6010 30 MAR 92 31 MAR 92 Selenium ND mg/L 0.050 7740 30 MAR 92 01 APR 92 Silver NO mg/L 0.010 6010 30 MAR 92 31 MAR 92 Sodium 258 mg/L 5.0 6010 30 MAR 92 31 MAR 92 ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Sandra Jones Approved By: Sandra Jones 931061 Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: General Inorganics Waste Management of North America, Inc. LF-UD 021825 -0005 -SA AQUEOUS 27 MAR 92 Parameter Result Alkalinity, Bicarb. as CaCO3 at pH 4.5 532 Alkalinity, Carb. as CaCO3 at pH 8.3 ND Chloride 39.0 Ammonia as N ND Nitrate as N 2.8 Sulfate 2320 ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Steve Pope Sampled: 26 MAR 92 Received: 27 MAR 92 Prepared: See Below Analyzed: See Below Reporting Analytical Units Limit Method mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L 5.0 310.1 5.0 310.1 3.0 300.0 0.10 350.1 0.10 300.0 50.0 300.0 Approved.By: Blake Besser A Gaming Gee.., Prepared Analyzed Date Date NA NA NA NA NA NA 27 MAR 92 27 MAR 92 27 MAR 92 30 MAR 92 27 MAR 92 27 MAR 92 931061 Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter Gross Alpha Radium 226 Gross Beta Radium 228 Radiochemistry Waste Management of North America. Inc. LF-U0 021825 -0005 -SA AQUEOUS Sampled: 26 MAR 92 27 MAR 92 Prepared: See Below Reporting Result Units Limit 40 pCi/L +/- 26 0.1 pCi/L +/- 0.4 18 pCi/L +/- 22 0.9 pCi/L +/- 2.4 ND - Not detected NA • Not applicable Reported By: Ramona Power Received: 27 MAR 92 Analyzed: See Below Analytical Method 900.0 705 Modified 900.0 EPA Specified Approved By: Blake Besser A Comm Canal, Prepared Analyzed Date Date NA 09 APR 92 NA 14 APR 92 NA 09 APR 92 NA 09 APR 92 931061 • • Volatile Organics Target Compound List (TCL) Method 8240 Client Name: Waste Management of North America, Inc. Client ID: ES lab ID: 021837-0006-EB Matrix: AQUEOUS Sampled: 27 MAR 92 Received: 28 MAR 92 Authorized: 28 MAR 92 Prepared: 29 MAR 92 Analyzed: 09 APR 92 Reporting Parameter Result Units Limit Acetone Benzene Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Bromomethane 2-Butanone (MEK) Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromethane Dibromochloromethane 1,1-Dichloroethane 1,2-Dichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethene 1,2-01chloroethene (total) 1,2- ichloro ropane cis-1,3-Dichloropropene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene Ethyl benzene 2-Hexanone Methylene chloride 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIRK) Styrene 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane Tetrachloroethene Toluene 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1,1,2-Trichloroethane Trichloroethene Vinyl acetate Vinyl chloride Xylenes (total) Surrogate Toluene -d8 4-Bromofluorobenzene ND ug/L 10 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 10 ND ug/L 10 NO L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 NO ND g/L 10 5.0 ND ug/L 10 ND ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 NO . ug/L 5.0 ND 5.0 ND ug/t 5.0 NO NO g/L 0 10 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ND g/L 10 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 10 ND ND g/L 10 5.0 Recovery 105 r. 94 y (continued on following page) ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Stephanie Boehnke Approved By: Karen Kuiken A C c'u'1 Campy.. 931061 Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Volatile Organics Target Compound List (TEL) Method 8240 Waste Management E8 021837-0006-EB AQUEOUS 28 MAR 92 Surrogate 1,2-Dichlormethane-44 of North America, Inc. NO - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Stephanie Boehnke Sampled: 27 MAR 92 Prepared: 29 1AR 92 Recovery 100 Received: 28 MAR 92 Analyzed: 09 APR 92 Approved By: Karen Kuiken A C -.v- Caepwv 331061 Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter Chlorinated Pesticides and PCB's Target Compound List (TCL) Method 8080 Waste Management of North America, Inc. EB 021837-0006-EB AQUEOUS Sampled: 27 MAR 92 28 MAR 92 Prepared: 31 MAR 92 gamma-BHC (Lindane) Endrin Methoxychlor Toxaphene Surrogate Dibutyl chlorendate NO - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Lue Lor Result ND ND NO NO Units ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L Recovery 90 7. Received: 28 MAR 92 Analyzed: 08 APR 92 Reporting Limit 0.050 0.10 0.50 5.0 Approved By: Karen Kuiken Enseco A Comm Company 931061 Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter RCRA Herbicides Method 8150 Waste Management of North America, Inc. EB 022490 -0008 -SA AQUEOUS 29 APR 92 2,4-0 2,4,5-TP (Silvex) Surrogate DCAA NO - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Susan McCool Sampled: 28 APR 92 Prepared: 01 MAY 92 Received: 29 APR 92 Analyzed: 08 MAY 92 Reporting Result Units Limit NO ug/L ND ug/L Recovery 94 12 1.7 Approved By: Karen Kuiken ACESCCO Ciw�W�r 931061 • •1 Client Name: Client I0: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter Arsenic Barium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury Potassium Selenium Silver Sodium Waste Management 0S 21837-0006-EB AQUEOUS 28 MAR 92 Metals Total Metals of North America, Inc. Sampled: 27 FAR 92 Prepared: See Below Result Units ND mg/L ND mg ND mg/L ND mg/L ND mg%L ND ND mg/L ND ND g/L ND mg/L ND mg/L ND ND 9/ L 9/ NO mg/L ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Sandra Jones Reporting Limit 0.010 0.010 0.0050 0.20 0.010 0.1;0 0.0050 0.20 0.010 0.00020 5.0 0.010 0.010 5.0 Received: 28 MAR 92 Analyzed: See Below Analytical Method 7060 6010 6010 6010 6010 6010 7421 6010 6010 7470 6010 7740 6010 6010 Approved_By: Sandra Jones A Conlin Company Prepared Analyzed Date Date 30 MAR 92 02 APR 92 30 MAR 92 31 MAR 92 30 MAR 92 31 MAR 92 30 MAR 92 31 MAR 92 30 MAR 92 31 MAR 92 30 MAR 92 31 MAR 92 30 MAR 92 02 APR 92 30 MAR 92 31 MAR 92 30 MAR 92 31 MAR 92 30 MAR 92 31 MAR 92 30 MAR 92 31 MAR 92 30 MAR 92 01 APR 92 30 MAR 92 31 MAR 92 30 MAR 92 31 MAR 92 931061 Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix:. Authorized: General Inorganics Waste Management of North America, Inc. EB 021837-0006-EB AQUEOUS 28 MAR 92 Parameter Result Alkalinity, Bicarb. as CaCO3 at pH 4.5 ND Alkalinity, Garb. as CaCO3 at pH 8.3 ND Chloride ND Ammonia as N NO Nitrate as N ND Sulfate NO ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Steve Pope A Caring Cape. Sampled: 27 MAR 92 Received: 28 MAR 92 Prepared: See Below Analyzed: See Below Reporting Analytical Prepared Analyzed Units Limit Method Date Date mg/L mg/L 9/L mg/L mg/L mg/L 5.0 310.1 5.0 310.1 3.0 300.0 0.10 350.1 0.10 300.0 5.0 300.0 NA NA NA NA NA NA Approved. By: Blake Sesser 28 MAR 92 28 MAR 92 28 MAR 92 30 MAR 92 28 MAR 92 28 MAR 92 931061 Client Name: Client ID: Lab ID: Matrix: Authorized: Parameter Gross Alpha Radium 226 Gross Beta Radium 228 Radiochemistry Waste Management of North America, Inc. 021837-0006-EB AQUEOUS Sampled: 27 MAR 92 28 MAR 92 Prepared: See Below Result 0.8 0.0 1.6 0.0 ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Ramona Power Received: 28 MAR 92 Analyzed: See Below Reporting Analytical Units Limit Method pCi/L (+-2.4 pCi/L (l(+-0.3 pCi/L +-5.2 pCi/L +-1.4 900.0 705 Modified 900.0 EPA Specified Enseco A C.nn GAIpM. Prepared Analyzed Date Date NA 14 APR 92 NA 14 APR 92 NA 14 APR 92 NA 16 APR 92 Approved.By: Roxanne Sullivan 931061 Volatile Organics Target Compound List (TCL) Method 8240 Client Name: Waste Management of North America, Inc. Client ID: TB Lab ID: 021837 -0007 -TB Matrix: AQUEOUS Sampled: Unknown Authorized: 28 MAR 92 Prepared: 29 MAR 92 Parameter Acetone Benzene Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Bromomethane 2-Butanone (MEK) Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromethane Dibromochloromethane 1,1-Dichloroethane 1,2-01chloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethene 1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 1,2-Dichloroppropane cis-1,3-Dichloropropene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene Ethylbenzene Z-Hexanone Methylene chloride 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) Styrene 1,1,2.2-Tetrachloroethane Tetrachloroethene Toluene 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1,1,2-Trichloroethane Trichioroethene Vinyl acetate Vinyl chloride Xylenes (total) Surrogate Toluene -d8 4-Bromofluorobenzene Received: 28 MAR 92 Analyzed: 09 APR 92 Reporting Result Units Limit ND ug/L 10 ND L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 0 5.0 ND ND uug/L 10 ND ug/L 15.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 10 ND ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 10 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 5.0 ND L 5.0 NO ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 10 36 ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 10 ND ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 10 ND ug/L 10 ND ug/L 5.0 Recovery 107 y 92 y (continued on following page) ND - Not detected NA - Not applicable . Reported By: Stephanie Boehnke Approved By: Karen Kuiken A Coma' cam.,, 931061 Volatile Organics Target Compound List (TCL) Method 8240 Client Name: Waste Management of North America, Inc. Client ID: TB Lab ID: 021837-0007-T8 Matrix: AQUEOUS Sampled: Unknown Received: 28 MAR 92 Authorized: 28 MAR 92 Prepared: 29 MAR 92 Analyzed: 09 APR 92 Surrogate 1,2-Oichloroethane-d4 NO - Not detected NA - Not applicable Reported By: Stephanie Boehnke Recovery 100 Approved By: Karen Kuiken A Calvin Co.p..- 931061 Enseco 'I METHOD BLANK REPORT —J Volatile Organics by GC/MS (cont.) • "—•J Analyte Result Test: 8240CP-TCL-AP Matrix: AQUEOUS QC Lot: 22 MAR 92-L QC Run: 06 APR 92-L Acetone Benzene Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Bromomethane 2-Butanone (MEK) Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride Chiorobenzene Chloroethane jjChloroform Chloromethane Dibromochloromethane 1,1-Dichloroethane 7 1,2-Dichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethene 1,2-Dichloroethene •1 (total) 1,2-Dichloropropane is-1,3-Dichloropropene II.rans-1,3-01chloropropene Ethyl benzene 2-Hexanone Methylene chloride 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIRK) r Styrene 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane Tetrachloroethene 1 Toluene —al 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1,1,2-Trichloroethane Trichloroethene Vinyl acetate Vinyl chloride Xylenes (total) r r Reporting Units Limit 16 ug/l 10 ND L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 10 ND ug/L 10 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 10 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 10 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 10 ND ug/L 5.0 ND L 10 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 10 ND ug/L 10 ND ug/L 5.0 AAConewsiCaaav 931061 METHOD BLANK REPORT Volatile Organics by GC/MS '• Reporting Analyte Result Units Limit r• —• 1 Test: 8240CP-TCL-AP Matrix: AQUEOUS QC Lot: 08 APR 92-Z QC Run: 08 APR 92-Z Acetone Benzene Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Bromomethane 2-Butanone (MEK) Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromethane Dibromochloromethane 1,1-Dichloroethane 1,2-Dichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethene 1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 1.2-Dichloropropane cis-1,3-Dichloropropene trans-1,3-Oichioropropene Ethyl benzene 2-Hexanone Methylene chloride 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) Styrene 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane Tetrachloroethene Toluene 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1,1,2-Trichloroethane Trichloroethene Vinyl acetate Vinyl chloride Xylenes (total) 10 ug/L 10 ND ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 10 ND ug/L 10 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 10 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 10 ND ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 5.0 ND ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 10 1.8 ug/L 5.0 J ND ug/L 10 ND ug/L 5.0 NO ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 10 ND L 10 NO ug/L 5.0 J - Result is detected below the reporting limit or is an estimated concentration. 931061 A Caws C .,ym. METHOD BLANK REPORT Volatile Organics by GC/MS (cont.) Reporting Analyte Result Units Limit _ I Test: 8240CP-TCL-AP Matrix: AQUEOUS QC Lot: 09 APR 92-L QC Run: 09 APR 92-L Acetone Benzene Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Bromomethane 2-Butanone (MEK) Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chloroethane Chloroform Chioromethane Dibromochloromethane 1,1-Dichioroethane 1,2-Dichioroethane 1,1-Dichloroethene 1,2-Dichloroethene (total) l,2-Dichloropropene is-1,3-Dichloropropene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ? Ethylbenzene 2-Hexanone Methylene chloride 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) Styrene 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane Tetrachloroethene Toluene 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1,1,2-Trichloroethane Trichloroethene Vinyl acetate Vinyl chloride Xylenes (total) 3.8 ug/L 10 J ND L 5.0 D ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 10 ND ug/L 10 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 10 ND ug/L 5.0 NO L 10 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND L 5.0 NO ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 10 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 10 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND g ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 10 ND ug/L 10 ND ug/L 5.0 - Result is detected below the reporting limit or is an estimated concentration. 931061 M L Y eco A C...-.1 Camw-7 METHOD BLANK REPORT - Volatile Organics by GC/MS Reporting Analyte Result Units Limit - Test: 8240CP-TCL-AP Matrix: AQUEOUS — QC Lot: 09 APR 92-L QC Run: 14 APR 92-L Acetone Benzene - Bromodichloramethane Bromoform • Bromomethane 2-Butanone (MEK) Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromethane Dibromochloromethane 1,1-Dichloroethane 1,2-Oichloroethane 1,1-Oichloroethene 1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 2-Oichloropropane s-1,3-Dichloropropene grans-1,3-Dichloropropene 7, Ethyl benzene 2-Hexanone Methylene chloride a 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIRK) Styrene 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane Tetrachloroethene Toluene 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1,1,2-Trichloroethane `,Trichlaroethene Vinyl acetate Vinyl chloride Xylenes (total) 1 7.8 ug/L 10 J 5.0 ND ug/L L 5.0 ND uND g/L 5.0 NO ug/L 10 ND L 10 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 10 ND ND g/ 5.0 10 ND u9/L 5.0 NO 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND u9/L 5.0 ND 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 5.0 ND 5.0 1.2 ug/L 10 J 1.2 ug/L 5.0 J ND ug/L 10 NO ug/L5.0 NO u9/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 ND ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 5.0 ND u9/L 10 ND ug/L 10 ND 00. 5.0 J - Result is detected below the reporting limit or is an estimated concentration. METHOD BLANK REPORT Volatile Organics by GC/MS Reporting Analyte Result Units Limit I Test: 8240CP-TCL-AP Matrix: AQUEOUS QC Lot: 29 APR 92-Z QC Run: 29 APR 92-Z Acetone Benzene Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Bromomethane 2-Butanone (MEK) Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromethane Dibromochloromethane 1,1-Dichloroethane 1,2-Dichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethene 1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 7 w',2-Dichloropropane cis-1,3-Dichloropropene trans-I,3-Oichloropropene Ethylbenzene 2-Hexanone Methylene chloride 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIRK) Styrene 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane Tetrachloroethene Toluene 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1.1,2-Trichioroethane Trichloroethene 1 Vinyl acetate Vinyl chloride Xylenes (total) 13 ug/L 10 NC ug/L 5.0 NC ug/L 5.0 NC ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 10 NO ug/L 10 NO NC ug/L 5.0 NC NC / L 5.0 10 NC ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 10 NC ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 5.0 NO ug/L 5.0 NC ug/L 5.0 NC ug/L 5.0 NC NC ug/L 5.0 NC ug/L 5.0 NC ug/L 5.0 NC ug/L 10 1.2 ug/L 5.0 J NC NC ug/Lug/L 10 NC ug/L 5.0 NC, ug/L 5.0 NC ug/L 5.0 NC ug/L 5.0 NC ug/L 5.0 g NC' u/ 5.0 L 10 NC ug/L 10 NC, ug/L 5.0 J - Result is detected below the reporting limit or is an estimated concentration. 931061 METHOD BLANK REPORT Metals Analysis and Preparation _ Analyte Reporting Result Units Limit Test: HG-CVAA-AD Matrix: AQUEOUS QC Lot: 30 MAR 92-6A QC Run: 30 MAR 92-6A Mercury • Test: HG-CVAA-AD Matrix: AQUEOUS QC Lot: 30 MAR 92-68 QC Run: 30 MAR 92-66 Mercury ND mg/L 0.00020 ND mg/L 0.00020 ▪ Test: ICP-AT Matrix: AQUEOUS QC Lot: 30 MAR 92-6D QC Run: 30 MAR 92-60 y Barium 1 Cadmium Calcium Chromium j '-on ;nesium ..oganese Potassium Silver Sodium Test: HG-CVAA-AT Matrix: AQUEOUS QC Lot: 30 MAR 92-6A QC Run: 30 MAR 92-6A Mercury ND mg/L 0.010 NO 109/L0 ND mg/L 0.20 ND mg/L 0.010 ND 0.10 ND m9/I 0.20 ND mg/L 0 0. 10 ND ND mg/L 0.010 NO mg/L 5.0 ND mg/L 0.00020 Test: SE -FAA -AT Matrix: AQUEOUS QC Lot: 30 MAR 92-6D QC Run: 30 MAR 92-60 Selenium ND mg/I. 0.0050 • o A � one", 9:31061 DATE: April 5, 1993 CASE NUMBER: ZCH-96 NAME: Waste Services Corporation, c/o Waste Management 40000 Weld County Road 25 Ault, CO 80610 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the W2 SW4 and the SE4 SW4 of Section 32, T5N, R66W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: Approximately 1-1/2 miles northeast of the Town of Milliken. It is the opinion of the Department of Planning Services' staff that Condition of Approval #1, as approved for Special Use Permit #116, is not in compliance. Condition of Approval #1 states: That any sanitary landfill facility to be installed shall be approved by the State Health Department. Mr. John Pickle, in his memoranda dated February 22, 1993 and March 30, 1993, to Chuck Cunliffe and his memorandum dated April 1, 1993, to the Board of County Commissioners, has identified the items of noncompliance with Condition of Approval #1 for Special Use Permit #116. On April 1, 1993, Waste Services Corporation submitted applications for amended Special Use permit #116 and amended Certification of Designation #26. Bill Hedberg's letter of March 31, 1993, is attached, The Department of Planning Services is proceeding with the processing of the applications. Based upon the above information, the Department of Planning Services and Weld County Health Department recommends that the probable cause hearing be continued to December 1, 1993, to allow sufficient time for the amended Special Use permit and amended Certificate of Designation applications to be reviewed and considered by Weld County during the standard land -use application review procedures. 00 9302 uub08 a fl J• ef II stpt COLORADO mEmoRAn1Qum To From Subject: Chuck Cunliffe, Planning March 30, 1993 John Pickle, Hea Central Weld Sanitary Landfill On March 2, 1993, Trevor Jiricek of our staff inspected the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. The purpose of the inspection was to assess the facility's compliance with the "Regulations Pertaining to Solid Waste Disposal Site's and Facilities", as promulgated by the Solid Waste Disposal Sites and Facilities Act, Title 30, Article 20, Part 1, C.R.S. The facility continues in a state of non-compliance as previously cited in my memo to you of 2-21-92: 1. The operators have not submitted a complete Design and Operations Plan. 2. The Central Weld Sanitary Landfill continues to operate without required Discharge Permits. 3. The Central Weld Sanitary Landfill continues to contaminate the groundwater. 4. The Central Weld Sanitary Landfill has allowed solid waste to come into contact with groundwater on this site. I met with Bill Hedberg, Site Manager on March 23, 1993. Although we primarily discussed other matters, no mention was made of any change in these areas of non- compliance. In addition, I have received nothing to date with regard to same. If you have further questions, please contact Trevor Jiricek or me. DD 931061 2 Waste Services Corporation 6037 77th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80634 303/330-2641 March 31, 1993 A Waste Management Company Mr. Chuck Cunliffe, Director Department of Planning Services Weld County Administrative Offices 1400 North 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 Re: Central Weld Sanitary Landfill Submittal of Amendment Application for Special Use Permit No. 116 and related Certificate of Designation No. 26 Dear Mr. Cunliffe: Enclosed for your review and consideration are 25 copies of Waste Services Corporation's application to amend the existing Special Use Permit No. 116 and the related Certificate of Designation No. 26 for the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. These copies are for your use and distribution to the appropriate County departments and referral agencies. This proposal reflects our plans for continued proper operation and future proper closure of this facility. We are submitting this application. and supporting information voluntarily and in a spirit of cooperation with Weld County although there is no state or local law or regulation requiring the amendment of the Certificate of Designation or the Special Use Permit. We maintain that the existing Certificate of Designation and the Special Use Permit have been complied with and continue to be valid. This submittal should not be construed as a waiver of any rights that we have under the current Certificate of Designation, the Special Use Permit, or the applicable laws and regulations. However, we hope that this proposal will result in a mutually acceptable Certificate of Designation and Special Use Permit modification. We look forward to working with you and the other referral representatives through this process to formalize our commitments, plans, and operations for the remaining reasonable life of this facility and its future proper closure. Please contact me at 330- 2641 if you desire additional information or clarification. Sincerely, Bill Hedberg Division V.P. - Landfill Operations V APR U 1 1993 ntwnnir cc: Weld County Commissioners, individually, w/o enclosures Lee Morrison, Assistant WC attorney, w/o enclosures John Pickle, WC Department of Health, w/o enclosures Glenn Mallory, Colorado Department of Health, w/o enclosures 93'106' Go Wilk Yo COLORADO mEmoRPnDum From Subject: Chuck Cunlif£e, Planning John Pickle, Health Central Weld Sanitary Landfill April 1, 1993 I have received the Amended Certificate of Designation application, and associated documents, for the above referenced facility. Upon preliminary review the application appears to be complete. u n--- -m• Magnin' 931061 00 fi COLORADO April 2, 1993 Mr. William S. Hedberg Waste Services Corporation 6037 77th Avenue Greeley, CO 80634 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303)353-M45, EXT. 3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 1400 N. 17TH AVENUE GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 Subject: USR-1012 - A request for a Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit to amend Certificate of Designation #26 and Special Use permit #116 for a sanitary landfill described as part of the SE4 of Section 31, T5N, R66W, part of the S2 of Section 32, T5N, R66W, and part of the N2 of Section 5, T4N, R66W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. Dear Mr. Hedberg: Your application and related materials for the requests described above appear to be complete and in order at the present time. A meeting will be scheduled before the Weld County Planning Commission after the Certificate of Designation recommendation is received from the Colorado Department of Health. It is anticipated that the review by the Colorado Department of Health could take up to six months. I will notify you by letter when the Planning Commission hearing has been scheduled. It is the policy of Weld County to refer an application of this nature to any town or municipality lying within three miles of the property in question or if the property under consideration is located within the comprehensive planning area of a town or municipality, Therefore, our office will be sending a copy of the submitted materials to the City of Greeley and the Town of Milliken for their review and comments. Please call Hank Epstein, at 350-9783, with the City of Greeley and Margaret Wakeman, at 587- 4331, with the Town of Milliken, for further details regarding the City of Greeley and Town of Milliken's review processes. It is recommended that you and/or a representative be in attendance at any meeting conducted to answer and questions about your applications. If you have any questions, please call or visit me. Sincerely, Chuck Cunliffe, AICP Director CAC/sfr UG) 931061 5-- DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE int SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. e NAME BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) fly- siYo TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) RgY-f7,s .TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE Um SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. NAME BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) any »-? 7 TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS t'$ Brr NL) • • DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. NAME BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) 2 -v 67osS TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. NAME BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SI'Z'E IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. ed Gic (NAME BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS • DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE srrE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicab regu tory requirements. PBUsINESS NAME (if app cable) 9C2 TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. NAME BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) a Y- 5//c, TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE TEE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. NAME BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) a&Y- 77.g 7 TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITED! AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory`` requirements. ScAne. }4otcoenJ NAME 4// }Asc gh4,e s BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) 3,5--/5/5.2_ - TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. BUSINESS N (if applicable) TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. a„„ egil ktJSINESS NAME (if licable) s 75-/2' TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS 93141 DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPlatATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. BUS S NAME (if applicable) cJar-mss/- oy7.sr' TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. aciarreGEe '/GSo NAME BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. NAME BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) ,� 53 ‘fr.3) /.323 34(/° TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS 93106i 4 DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. ►2a. N qy REEVE NAME RRAMC k BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) .2 PI- O15 TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. QA,1 97-1,CWW•Ltelbtar BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) g 53 774 , TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) fps `(rr6 ‘7aN/fg TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS 9Z1061I° DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNEF; and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) 33c `)o≥ TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE yen to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE srrE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all,elpplicable reguw tory requirements. f04- eo r✓ Co% Di '9( BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) 6-31700 TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. Q[ r 9, t 1414.r9 NAME BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) gY" 47 3 TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS --- 93:0-1 1 S DEAR COMMISSIO As a concerned user of the Cnuii1 Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to -allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. Qedtte BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) 7 /4995/h, `5C7 7957 TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS DEAR COMMISSIO As a concerned user of the,Ccntral Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to' allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. � pc/ex , l41. 41-r/L r/c c q BUSINESS NAI (if applicable) ?S6 79/ 7 TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE rtt SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. 171 Or C N BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) 353- GWao TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS 4 • • DEAR COMMISSIONERS: NAME As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, i URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. NAME LL4.f Ec BUSINESS k s� l 42L -77a3 TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. NAME BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) 3a /R' �. ,( �ez ✓ ArO6.?o TELEPHO NUMBER OR ADDRESS As a concerned user of.thc,Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS 9::04 DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. POS4,cli Mo,oictdDu) NAME BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) 3sa - SSo? rant' TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. Q2 J zi7 �rd NAME BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. NAME BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) soh �y TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS Aho rQ • • DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE its SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. T2rA7 NAME BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) U93-arCI TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. NAME BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) 2/..3/4 Creefel es TELEPHONE NUMBER OR AJ )RESS DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regula piy requirements. BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS 931061 NAME As a concerned user of the central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE JUIL SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. 4,, 4 .Ti A 4-.4 62-4, NAME BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS DEAR COMMISSI As a concerned user Of tits„ent/al Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to'allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) I (< fy AFB ---4' TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. D _•.••fa td NAME .7414 BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) 2}sci- s E T $ate F -?6' / os.,/4 C O TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS c.;c> Cy,, 93106 DEAR COMMISSI As a concerned user of the central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. NAME B U applicable) ( ldl) /49th //ut. 6ree/p$ TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS if SN c. DEAR COMMISSIONERS:, -,t As a concerned user'bf ttheCentral Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. NAME \ BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) °k0.\ b eLia.Ch - L\c*I S TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS DEAR COMMISSIO As a concerned user of the C.entraI Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to -allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. NAME _pf/Atc C.; 2 ✓/ «S BUSINESS NAME, (if applicable) 330-pL y/ TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS Nn) ffJ 931061 w DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central. Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. NAME a92i hdfu BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) ---7:?/-0 w,*' sSEN 03 'J3i1N3G .JW9 £It.'30 HONE NUMBEI, OR ADDRESS N� 931061 DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE rnt SITE N AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) // �� 362 -o/9fr 707 4forrr 4 86674/ TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE N AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. f?✓TZ Cc2/ E NAME 1241/L/JE Cuivir BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) ?o —8870 TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS w DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. AME Szeitt4Q,A bta BUS�AME CF (if applicable) ?fie- /,9 o o/ /5'! 0 /l /la TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS 6,<-./.2 V y C O - y0 S 931061 NA) • DEAR COMMISSIONERS:: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. r r t eryl°f NAME BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) 295C TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. en/ a NAME BUSINESS N (if applicable TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS DEAR COMMISSIOIi As a concerned user k% the Centr¢�1 Weld Sanitary _ T - Landfill, I URGE your allow, ante Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. �..jW goo NAME BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) 3S6 3S -15 — TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS 5TAs3;- s 31 931d DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE Um SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. /6444 e 7Z-Af NAME 7 ged ren BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) (3.03 429'224/ TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. Q _snce,rc NAME !'arcA isr 1/,/) /i."1 /4111.P. BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) 517—Y/Cr 1 0 TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory] quirements. NAME BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) 3527c/z3 e/o/�-/2a2J / TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS salold DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. On -Q, feciAz< NAME% BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) — HONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. aau((56aiiThif//M1 NAME BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) afl -(oizq TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. NAME BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS 93106/2.4 DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. n ^1 c va ih NAME BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) 212. 1 G ' 4 &<c TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE rill SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. NAME eP5 BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) ."x.56 3sz.s • TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OP LATE TEE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. --it NAd gay BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS 931061 DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. all 5i�id,fS NAME BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) X330-072.5 TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance wi licable crregulatory requirements. a 077 f fly ebaA BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) �d2 _ G _ GS7Sz,3 TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS DEAR COMMISSIONERS: As a concerned user of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, I URGE you to allow Waste Services Corporation to CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE SITE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER and in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements. 7,77 7)7 (r1�re NAME eyc BUSINESS NAME (if applicable) (/;.S/ TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS 931p6t r - • APRIL 5th HEARING 9:00 A.M. CENTENNIAL BLDG. Wind & rain would erode this proposed Garbage M untain. Please join in the effort to protect our surface and ground water. Coloradans Concerned Over Water )(44 ti) M M 931061 1 DEAR COMMISSIONERS: Please close and remediate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect ogr surface and ground walk,soil, & the Big Thompson & Platte Rivers. Name (print) Signatur -166O TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS Citizens Concerned Olaf Water DEAR COMMISSIONERS: Please close and remedlate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect our surface and ground water, soil. A the Big Thompson o Platte Rivers, Name (pri t)_itp_tia ss 4,, 4AAr c.1e1 Signature .LrF-_�._-0 330 31. op '.'Si Mil+k .k ,t. TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS la3 11 CIOxents Concerned Over Water 931061 ti; at Weld see OM OM ompson Name (printLi1ig Signature_. p d sex (tai svidIp TELEPHONE tWMBER OR ADDRESS Citizens titel rs.! Over Water Please close end remediate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill: Protect our surface and ground water.cSoil. & the Big Thompson & PlatteRivers. Name (print}_ Signature_,._ altiaQbr _-- is *Lia Siviet! TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS Citizens Concerned Over Water DEAR COMMISSIONERS: Please close and remediate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect ow surface and ground water, soil. & the Big Thompson & Platte Rivers. al7w�" -- Name (print). pl,C Signature�pA TELEPHONE NtiMBaR'4)R ADDRESS Citizens Concerned Over Water 9310613 DEAR COWS 0 S Please close and i'amediate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect our .surface .'end .round water, soil.. & the Big Thompson & Plage Rivers. Name {prig Signature_: rzi TELEPHONE NUM'EER OR ADDRESS Citizen. Concerned Over Water DEAR CO STONERS: Please close and-remediate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. -Protect our surface and ground water, soil. & the Sig Thompson & Platte Rivers. Sit a WIC? M avt 931061 Name (print)'. Signature.._ —, If I TELEPHOyR ADDRESS Citizens conceraidl Over Water DEAR COMMISSIONERS; Please close and remedlate the pollution at Central Wald Sanitary Landfill Protect our surface . ground water, soil. & the Big Thomp Platte Rivers. Name (p Signature_ TELEPHONE " ER OR ADDRESS Citizens concerned Over Water DEAR COMMJSSIONER& Please close andremediate the pollution at Central Weld Stufltary Landfill. Protect our atMace and ground water, soil, & the Big Thompson & Platte Rivers. Name (p, Signature TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS Mlle's* Goncerned Over Water MM 931061 J� DEAR COMMISSIOMMIls Please close and remediate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect our surface and yrcund water. soil, & the Big Thompson & Platte Rivers. Name (print)f; ck Cc Signature_ 'ssrk___ 4 - TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS Citizens -Cosa reed Over Water Please Close and remedtate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect our surface and fffeeftd water, soil, & the Big Thompson ft Platte Rivers. Name (print):3;weltrAtAcsfiyi _ Signature..trlandejtgagt IQ3u. it Ned. TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS Citizens Otrecerned Over Water 931061 If DEAR COMMISSIONERS: Please close and remediate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill Protect our surface and ground water; soil, & the 919 Thompson & Platte Divers Name (print)... 9_-r' " Signature,l_ _ TELEPHONE N IMfl6R OR ADDRESS Citizens Ctt noernad Ovsr Water DEAR COMMISSIONERS: Please close and remediate ;:the 1. pollution at Central Weld .Sanitary Landfill. Protect our Surface and ground wader. Soil, & the Big Thompson & Platte Rivet Name (print) Signature_, TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS Cltlaene Canscerried.•. Oar Water SG/ 931061 DEAR COMMISSIONERS: Please close and remediat., the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill • Protect ow surface and ground Oaf, sell, & the Big Thompson & Platte Wirers, Name (prin Signature_ mLEPHONB MASER OR ADDRESS Mittens Concerned Over Water (3o9 6) /Pl3 DEAR COMMISSIONERS: : Please ciose end remedial* the pollution at Central . Weld S Landfill, Protect _.,.6=. . soil, & the our �suritu�►,.�i Rig Tho►npson. .& s Name ( Signature.,_!' TatE r#orls tans oit ADDRESS Gititee►R Cane Over Wear MM 9310614 DEAR COMMiSSI+ S: Please close and rented$e* the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary. Landfill Protect ottr surface and ground wtyter. soil, & the Big Thompson & Pled. Rive s_ minion on sums Citizens Concerti DEAR COMMISSIONERS Please close and remedial. the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect oar surface and ground- wetar,, SW & the Big Thompson & Platte Ctrs. M6r d9 ,. tai ADDRESS ant Water Please close and remediate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect our surface and ground water, soil, & the Big Thompson & Platte Rivers. Name (print)J59/Ins� Signature 5aSilAnt b . Oevisrzyi Cltlzeaae Concerned Over Winter Please close and comet:Sete at Central Weld'. santlar$ our outface end round blip „ Thompson & Platte Name (zri t}:p Signaturq '1 the pollution Wflll. Protect , & the 931061 Name (print L A jk Signature__ ......... { -Tate 7 �r TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS Citroen& ,0014,4101114 Over Water Please aloe* and remediete the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect our surface and ground water, soil, & the Big Thompson & Plaa$e- Rivers. TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS Catixene Concerned Over Water DEARS OMMI$S10NftS Please close and remediate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect our surface and ground water, soil, & the Big Thompson & Platte Rivers, Name Signatu O s DEAR COMMISSIO St- <+ Please close and ternedtR the p(�fution at Central Weld Sanitary''Landfill. Protect Oar surface and ground water, soil, & the Big Thompson & Platte Mailers. Name (print)_ _Tee Signature, LUa. .....£ a_ TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS Citizens Consernsd Over Weldor DEAR COMMISSIONERS: Please close and remediate' the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect our surface and around water, soil, & the & .Piatte Rivers. Mg TELEPHONE IfER OR ADDRESS Cttltna 00nOlafned Over Water DEAtt COMMUS ONERS: Pima dose and iredlete the pollution at Central . 'WO* `cry Landfill. Protect our surface entaretnid water, Boil. & the Big Thompson & Mete Rivets. Name (pri Signature__ WI: 7( TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS Citizens Concerned Over Water DEAR COMMISSIONERS: Please close and remedial. the pollution of Central Weld Sanitary Landon, Protect Our surface : and ground water." soil. & the Big Thompson & Pits Rivers. nusepupta citizen Coactrant Over Water 9310 Please close and retnediate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect our surface and ground' fur, soil, & the Sig Thompson & Platte ' Rivers. Name (print),_ Signature__ Gto� TELEP1HO -NIYMBER OR ADDRESS Citizens Concerned Over Water Please close and rerneditile the pollution at Central Weld Sitary`Landfill. Protect our surface and ground r ,. soil, & the Sip Thompson A. P+t+ ►vi ft 93106 Pus cios. at Central wte�� our, face t Sig 'h►ioml Name Signature • •'` ` TBIIPHOOt� uR r DRESS CitlsOna Concerted boor Water otteRtIon Protect &the, Pleas* dose and rIfMdiate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect our surface and .VOW Water, soil, & the Big Thompson , & PI(Nla Rivers. Name (Print). Signature TELEPHONE NU ER OR ADDRESS Mimeos Conbrtri • d Over Water DEAR COMMISSIONERS: Please close and remediate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect our surface and ground "stet,: soil, & the Big Thompson & 'Mane 1 TELEPHONE NUMBER OR A DDRESS Citizens Concerned Over Water 15- 931061 Please don at Central We our sselrtir>dr Big Thompson DER OR ADDRESS Cltlx.n• Ormad l fld Over Water Pleats obese and at Central W.1tl, Sant our surface and Big Thompson & Name fpripIL Signature ,._! TELEPHONE M C Hlaarta Con.+ 931061 Please close and remedlate thepollution at Central Weld Sanitary iyandffa. Protect our surface and ground t er, j soil. & the Sig Thompson' & Platte Name (pri Signature, _...w... 7 ea. wet., TeXt 3I Pleads close and remealate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect our surface ' and groin mar *IW .soil, & the Sig Thompson :a , 77.4- TELSPI4 roman Oa ADDRESS Citizens Concerned:. Over Water` MM 931061 117 DEAR COMAISSIO} Please close and ►emedtetil the pollution et Central Weld Sanitary Landfill Protect owrsurface end ground ?k#ter; soil, & the Big Thompson & Platte' Rivers. Name (print /t%i J S?rA%tr _____ Signature. r TELEPHONE gUltaER OR ADDRESS Cltt stte CDnCArtted Over Water Metal close at Central We our sudacs Sd Dig Thom N#me IPA . Sigttatute„ vtemedttlte the poltutton Sanitary Landfill. Protoct water, .4 "& the e Watt mM 93106114 WAR COM 1SSICI : Please close and remedhMepollution at central Wald . Sanitary Lvi fill. Protect omir surface and ground water,; sail; & the Big Thompson & Platte Rivets. Name (Print), Signature Please close and remediate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect our surface and ground water, soil, & the Big Thompson & Plead Rivers. Name (print) S4Q� Signature Citizen; Concerned Over Water 931061 Please close and remediate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect our surface and ground water, soil. & the Big Thompson & Platte Rivera. --�' 10W Un Name (print)_��'e Signature_ Citizens Concerned Over Water Please close and remediate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect our surface and ground water, soil, & the Big Thompson & Platte Rivers. Name (prin Signature_ Citizens Concerned Over Water Please close and remediate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect our surface and ground water, soil. & the Big Thompson & Platte Rivers. Name (prin " V +z.Gt S0^1 Signature__ f J Citizens Concerned Over Water Please close and remediate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect our surface and ground water. soil, & the Big Thompson & Platte Rivers. Name (print Signature l?J_�1�� Citizens Concerned Over Water Please close and remediate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect our surface and ground water, soil. & the Big Thompson & Platte Rivers, Name (print Signature Citizens Concerned Over Water Please close and remediate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect our surface and ground water, soil. & the Big Thompson & Platte Rivers. Name (pri t _Sage �� Signature �� Citizens Concerned Over Water 41 93106 Please close and remediate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect our surface and ground water, soil, & the Big Thompson & Platte Rivers. Name (pri,nt)LQ,,‘, ,;,a__ Signature Citizens Concerned Over Wmser 0/1 931061 g? Name(print) Sienature., 1„1y ThLEPHO Chien DEAR COMMISt NBRSt Please close end remedial', the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill . Protect ow surface and ground wl. `.soil, & the Big Thompson & Platte R)vers. ER OR ADDRESS limed Over Water Name (print)_!y." torintit --- Signature_) r hYps, 151—'1 ZA4 i'ELEPHQt+IS PIWOEI! O t.:ADDRBSS Citizens OoneerrtS :Over Weir DEAR COMMISSION) Please close nd remediate the pollution at G al 3 y Landfill Protect our s �e 'Entl, water, soil, & the Big Thompson i r w Rivers. Name (print) SignatUre„ ct%fardNta. C OR ADDRESS Over Wetly DEAR COMMISSIONERS: Please close and remediate• ;the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary •Latittt►ll. Protect • our surface and ground water, soil. & the Big Thompson b Platte *Mrs. TELEPHONE PWMWi ADDRESS Citizens COnosrnsd Over Water Please close and tit/Mediate the pollution at Central Weld • Sanitary dtlN: Protect our surface and ground *4 0.1110, Spill, a the Big Thompson & Platte t#t a. 931061 Mate the pollution y Landfill. Protect { water. soil. & the 1 . Rivers Please Goss andrr�liedlate the pollution at Central W ry Landfill. Protect our 'tad" water, son,A. the Bigp Rivers.., MM 931061 a‘ please close and $ntiti at Central Weld Sdn8 ..414r surface and drotn d Big Thompson & Name (print) Sign re J1' Please close and remedi*tt et Central Weld Sanitary Ct t our surface and ground watt'. xi Sig Thompson & Platte Rivers. Name (p►i a)_ 43-4 e S_ SignatureS.I 931461`9 Please close and remedtats the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary .4attditEl• Protect our surface arid ground Watt, soil, & the Big Thompson & Platte intrers. TELEPHONE NWOER. tilt ADDRESS Citizens Concerned' Over Water DEAR COM IISSIONeRS Please close and remedtate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill: Protect our surface and ground water, soil, & the Big Thompson a Mile Rivers. TELEPHONE ltt OR ADD Citizens •Concerned Over Water 931061 Please close and remedie%* the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill Protect our surface and ground w', soil, & the Big Thompson & Platte Rivers. Name (pri ) !t 4 &FAIT/ Signature ...._,�,.;,r 337- TELEPHONE NUS" Cllt ADDRESS Citizens Geneertymid Over Weiler Please clot* and ,re at Central. Weld Sea our SurfaCit eAld - proui Sig Thompson. & b the -pollution tdflll. Protect soil, & the /14 921061. Name (prttff). Signet DEAR COMMISSIONERS. Please close and renitslr! {><ha„ pollution at Central Weld Sanitary, LidpaStl; Protect O4r surface and ground water, soil, & the Big Thompson & Platte Rlyets DEAR COM [ISSIONF : Please close and remediate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect ow surface and wound water„ soil, & the Sig Thompson & Platte Rivers. Name (print), 1G. Signature TELEPHONE A C71 DRESS citizens cottesm*d ` Water Pleas, close and t „titt Central .Wild., ' aturface and tom! '`Big Thompson '8` Pie' Name (Frig' ? flu n Protect ril & the Please close and r mediate the pollution nt Central Weld ,, Protect our surface Wed.£ Me yivo�eop -Name (print) ti3lgnillllfe„_ ,r! 44 fill Please close and remediate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect our surface and ground water, soil, & the Big Thompson & Platte Rivers. Name (print __ tr0z u!v, Signature Lie Marts Concerned Over Water Please close and remedial* Ste pollution At Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, Protect our surface and ground water, soil, & the Big Thompson & Platte Riven M M -- 1O61 Pleasiii; close and , tried lehr„ re`:pollution rtt Centrist Weld Sanitary t Protect dtfr Office and fib +flltwiiir. a & the Big Thompson & Platte ttth Name (Print) -1441_ Signature. 44$ -CipS4 TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS Cttitens Concerned Over Water Please *se and rentediato the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect our surface and ground water, soil, & the Big Thompson & Plate '' Rivers. Name (print) Signature_ r TELEPFte MAMA Oft ADDRESS? Citizens Conoerfied Over Water DAR COMMISSION iRSS: Please close and rernedid ii' Ma ` pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect Oyr surface and ground water, sod, & the Big Thompson & Platte Rivers. Name (print) Signature VT" +A TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS Citlxen• Cortnerned Over Water 931.0613 • • Name (!1 Signature TELEPHONE OR ADDRESS Citizens Coaciare d Ow Water Please close and rernediate the pollution • at Central Weld Sanitary Protect our surface and ground Water, soil, 8 the Big Thompson & Matta Rivera, Name (print)_ Signature TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS Cltisa�at Cstrtlaad Over Water clone ettnadligtt, tht pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Lean Protect our surface and ground water, soil, & the Big Thompson & Platte Rivers, 331061 33 Please close and tsftladlate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, Protect our surface • and Meter, soil, 8 the Big Thompson I Rivers. A Name (tariff J Sign . a �avS TELEPHONE NUMBER 0 ADDRESS Citizens Caattri od Over Water DEAR COMMISSIONERS: Please close and remedied* Ina pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect our surface and ground With, soil, & the Big Thompson & Platte Rivers. Name • (punt)41i�«C U txtS Signature /.` TRUESNOtai atizorts t saocielf at out �$.J s e Tfitito ALA Nome ( WS Signature-` t(103)3S3 -1145 " jol'�`, . Veal Pi, enatm, 'lELEP ONE 14R OR K0DRESS O3 • Set, 31 Citizen* Cottltnedi Over Wet*, Please closeand nsrnediate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect our surface and ground water. soil. & the Big . Thompson & Platte Rivers. Name (print) ..fL5i,�.�' •r TELEPHONE NUMBER OR ADDRESS Citizen Concerned Over Water RIM COMNOPIONW: Please close and remediate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect ow surface and' ground water. soil, & the Big Thompson & Platte ;titters. Name (pr ) ,*.4 Signature_ Ir-F,V1ItO TELEPHONE NUMSER OR ADDRESS` Citizens Conerrrted Over Water MM at at tierttr , e Y � our aurfac+i' tllrattrr; h alt, ati Big Thompson Name Signature(,�rr_� TELL 3Y �' OR, ADDRESS DEAR COMMISSIONERS: Please close and remedial, the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill . Protect ogr surface and ground water, soil, & the Big Thompson "& Platte Rivers. Name (print) Signature__ ICI - s<,ti' TELEPHONE NU BEROR ADDRESS Citizens Cunieereed Over Water DEAR COMMISSIONERS: Please close and remediater the pollution at Central Weld' SartitarY.ciindfll. Protect our surface and, ground: water soil, S the Big Thompson & Platte Rivers. Name (pri t) Signature Qitere+re Ole 04 NI Valor ADDISS 931.061 la Please close and remedittte the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect our surface and ground water, soil, & the Big Thompson & Platte Rivers. Name (pr 1s Ptie ?SE Ai Signature riste '�-' ?4 t 7 i Zi` it C+f (ntede4, &fl TELEPHONE HUMS OR ADDRESS Cltlaana Concerned Oast Water DEAR COMMISSIONERS: Please close and - remedial, , the pollution of Central Weld Sanitary Landfill Protect ow surface and ground Water, soil, & the Big Thompson & Platte Rivets &rt TELEpapta ir$E OR / ,bItESS Melton Conoirriedi :aver Water M� 931061 -51 • • Please :dine Otte p► Uwloit at Central Wild Sanitary fill Protect cW surface and ground wider, soil, & the Thompson A Pulse Rivers. Name (print's,1�'i'1 Signature_,___,da TELEPHONE hIlfa B&it OR ADORE $ 7dgyf Citizens Concerned Over Water DEAR CO $I0N Please close and ramattlete the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary ;Landfill. Protect ogr surface and ground Water, soil, & the Big Thompson Si Platte) Rivers. Name (grin Signature__) fO11437___ TELEPHONE Nt$KB*R OR &DDRESS Citizens Concerned Over Water Please close and rMnsdiate the pollution at Central Weld eillistikliry Landfill. Protect our , a :aa#ti etiwd water, soil, & the Big f meson dr Rivers. 521.061 Citisina Cenaan d Over Water Meese close sag rar+AI et Central Weitt our suffice , end, ground .. , Sig Thompson ,$ Platte, Name (print) Signature__i the pollution X1811. Protect F.p-..e�ltr a the Citizen, OCRaerfl$l Over Water 931061 Please close and relnediate the pollution at Central Weld Senna* Landfill. Protect our surface aid protWd eater, soil, & the Big Thompson •d Platte Rivers. Citizen. COnaerntld Over Water Please dose and rilWiedlate the pollution at Central Weld Slelhey landfill. Protect our surface and rust -'water, soil, & the Big Thompson & r Rivers. /4Al '-N Citizen* t ed► Mf :h r+M� 1l I nil lit {t.#1t"'',lit { Citizens Oenoiratld over Wartsr Please close and rernediate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect our surface and ground water, soil, & the Big Thompson & Platte Rivers. Name (print)_ g_tcsti r� Signature__ Minns Concerned- O./ei Waster M �('1 I 9310611-1 Please close and nrnIedlate the pollution at Central Weld Sanibrt Landfill Protect our surface and, grow d . Mroter, soil, & the Big Thompson & Plate ' Rivers. Name (psi Signature_ Citizens Goiroornod Over Water Please close and remediate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, Protect our surface and ground water, soil, & the Big Thompson & Platte Rivers. Name (print) Signature Citizens Concerned Over Water Please close and remediate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect our surface and ground water, soil, & the Big Thompson & Platte Rivers. Name (pri _ LLCC! _ Ri fro Signatures-rr Citizens Concerned Over Water Please close and remediate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect our surface and ground water, soil, & the Big Thompson & Platte Rivers. Name (print)prL_ Signature_ __ Citlxene Concerned Over Water AGAR COMIIISSIOI'SS: Please close and realedb at Central Weld Sanitary our alailaca and ground_ t Big Thompson & Pint A Name (prlpitt e Slgnatur Manton ma moire *mists tltutiort' Protect &the ADDRESS Wlitor 921065 Please close and remediate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect our surface and ground water, soil, & the Big Thompson & Plane Rivers. Name (print) .1-4.0 Signaturer�h, +G�� Citizens Concerned Over Water Please dose and reMdialee the pollution at Central Weld SenftarV Landfill. Protect our surface Ms1 atetiftwatsr, soil, & the Sig Thompson & Platte Rivers. Please close and remediate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect our surface and ground water, soil. & the Big Thompson & Plane Rivers. Name (print) _ $& L. WSJJLrt-_-_ Signature -(1W-we, Citizens Concerned Over Water 9310614 Please close and remediate the pollution at Central Weld Samtary Landfill. Protect our surface and ground water, soil. & the Big Thompson & Platte Rivers. Name (print jscrigf2k Signature Citizens Concerned Over Water 93106t� Please close and remediate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect our surface and ground water, soil, & the Big Thompson & Platte Rivers. Name (print) ,40..y=//'/)<Ze AZ Signature Cl2lnce Cw cerced Own Water M 931061 Please close and remediate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect our surface and ground water, soil, & the Big Thompson & Platte Rivers. f` Name (pri t) � 4 J��e o_AA:ev Signature �._ Citizens Concerned Over Water Please close and remediate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect our surface and ground water, soil, & the Big Thompson & Platte Rivers. Name (pri Signature Citizens Concerned Over Water 11 Please close and remediate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect our surface and ground water, soil, & the Big Thompson & Platte Rivers. Name (print c„__p zY� Signature Citizens Concerned Over Water Please close and remediate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect our surface and ground water, soil, & the Big Thompson & Platte Rivers. Name (print) °SAG( %Rc9rGE) Signature \c7Sg Citizens Concerned Over Water Please close and remediate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect our surface and ground water, soil, & the Big Thompson & Platte Rivers. Name (print) Signature_ Citizens Concerned Over Water A4 d 93106'1 Please close and remediate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect our surface and ground water, soil, & the Big Thompson & Platte Rivers. Name (print) Signatur Citizens Con armed Oar Water Please close and remediate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect our surface and ground water, soil, & the Big Thompson & Plane Rivers. Name (print) Signature_. CitIzene Concerned Over Water Please close and remediate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect our surface and ground water, soil, & the Big Thompson & Platte Rivers. Name (prin Signature aiNIV y� U CItizene Concerned Over Water MM 931Q61' t Please close and remediate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect our surface and ground water, soil, & the Big Thompson & Platte Rivers. Name (print)_4(,S1!',r_-- Signature — . Citizens Concerned Over Water Please close and remediate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect our surface and ground water, soil, & the Big Thompson & Platte Rivers, Name (pri Signature senat Y 64ea6 Citizen Concerned Over Water Please close and remediate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect our surface and ground water, soil, & the Big Thompson & Platte Rivers. Name (print Signature Citizens Ct'no riled Over Water 931061 Please close and remediate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect our surface and ground water, soil, & the Big Thompson & Platte Rivers. Name (print Signature Citizen Concerned Over Water Please close and remediate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect our surface and ground water, soil, & the Big Thompson & Platte Rivers. Name (print) 4'1.4„iL 4 Aicno- Signature j -w- z r1/'cer__- Citizene Concerned Over Water Please close and remediate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Prol:ect our surface and ground water, soil, & the Big Thompson & Platte Rivers. Name (priesest)i`-fC �iCJ�l� u cer Signature__ ��YYY��444 =zone Concerned Over Water MM Please close and remediate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect our surface and ground water, soil, & the Big Thompson & Platte Rivers. Name (print)_ Signature Citizens Concerned Over Water Please close and remediate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect our surface and ground water, soil, & the Big Thompson & Platte Rivers. Name (print)-_ slier _Z gg Citizens Concerned Over Water Please close and remediate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect our surface and ground water, soil, & the Big Thompson & Platte Rivers. Name (print)_[ bf,„ Signature ?s.._— Citizens Concerned Over Water 31061 Please close and remediate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect our surface and ground water, soil, & the Big Thompson & Platte Rivers. C Name (prir�t) `rut- Signature _A - t , CItizens Concerned Over Water Please close and remediate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect our surface and ground water, soil, & the Big Thompson & Platte Rivers. Name (pri Signatur Cltlnene Concerned Over Water Please close and remediate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect our surface and ground water, soil, & the Big Thompson & Platte Rivers. Name (print) Signature_ Cltizens Concerned Over Water ON Please close and remediate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect our surface and ground water, soil, & the Big Thompson & Platte Rivers. Name (pri Signatur U Minns Concerned Over Walter 93106151 CLE":rf i') i : Please close and remediate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect our surface and ground water, soil, & the Big Thompson & Platte Rivers. Name (print)_ynsT Signature �2 ce Citizens Concerned Over Water GIt$zfls Contend On , Water v�su. 9106' tt:'El_D CCu:TY E?? !"7 2.. 2 ,. 9: n 3 r„1 Please close and remediate the pqt!u at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect " our surface and ground water, soil, & the Big Thompson & Platte Rivers. Name (print)_fGL �CYv3o� Signature Citizens Concerned Over Meer �.._.. D r.-, •. ,. Y « Please close and remediate the pollution 1.3 at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. e_iirptiect our surface and ground water, &X i& Sttj47) Big Thompson & Platte Rivers. Name ( .kg__ZateCra Signature_ A,.4p. CiRla±aane Concerned Over Water C .v .1 F:7? 22 Ci.E 70 7i . Please close and remediate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect our surface and ground water, soil, & the Big Thompson & Platte Rivers. Name (print) Signature C=Blaens Concerned Over Waver c� PC , 0,-; -3 93106fet • V 2-D CDC::TY 1993 19 Cl 9. 33 Please close and �rpjOlate the pollution at Central WeldT'$Ifnd):'Landfill. Protect our surface and ground water, soil, & the Big Thompson & Platte Rivers. Name (print) Signature ---- ct_C4 rn 71 9,33 Please close and remedIttteythe pollution at Central Weld SariitWELandf9l. Protect our surface and ground water, soil, & the Big Thompson & Platte Rivers. Name (print)_ Signature Cltlxens Concerned Over Water lel./ MAO 41. Nil CLER:( TO TFE Please close and remediate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect our surface and ground water, soil, & the Big Thompson & Platte Rivers. Name (pri t) So��- __ Signatur Cltlxems Concerned Over Water HA' a; ; taia6,4w4, • Please close and remediaafa the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect our surface and ground water, soil, & the Big Thompson S Platte Rivers: Name (print Signaturs_C' 4 Please close and remediate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect our surface and ground water, soil, & the Big Thompson & Platte Rivers. Name (print)_ALaiL) __n r-_SLJLrcz.e..: Signature_p, ic_adas, _ s ° T . Citizens Concerned Over Water •' Q 93106 7, ' . P.IMiMF'. Cteti • taw pelages at cnn w $Alery LarldtM. Proted our surface ant and walar, soil, ti Ow Dig Thompson i N1ni Rivers. Name (print) 411$J� r - Slgnatures --- Please close and remediate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect our surface and ground water, soil, & the Big Thompson & Platte Rivers. Name (print)__#�Np S Signature Citla.re C&tte1rmad Over Water r yvlO6�� Cam, Pt,G�.n y • r lL'. _D Co••'— nr— (293 ;'r) r6 k,„id r9 !6 Please close antterrdiate the pollution at Central Wile 7Sallritkary, Landfill, Protect our surface and ground water, soil, & the Big Thompson & Platte Rivers. Name (print)izL4. Signature_ G4_-- Cltinene Concerned Over Water ^, ?6 Ti 9: 15 Please close and 0trediate the pollution at Central Well°$e nitairt.andfill. Protect our surface and ground water, soil, & the Big Thompson & Platte Rivers.. j 2 Name (Prin) ��S¢d fli JJj Signature_1!-V?� 2e tr'ti -1-,& C94lnene Concerned Over Water D fir_ Please close and remedl6ife i thi pa11u,1on at Central Weld Sanittm I,.dflll. Prefect •cur surface and ground water, idolF:`89=mg Big Thompson & Platte RiveRIE-.7r ._ Name (print) Signature =zany Concerned Over Water Q 931461 1993 1-",.`,° 16 1.11 9: 41 CLE ,X TO Tr,: Please close and remediate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect our surface and ground water, soil, & the Big Thompson & Platte Rivers. Name (prl Signatur Citizens Concerned Over Water Please close and remediate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect our surface and ground water, soil, & the Big Thompson & Platte Rivers. Name (pri�t)t Signature_ � ,1Y1�12�,2 Citizens Concerned Over Water Please close and remediate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect our surface and ground water, soil, & the Big Thompson .84 Platte Rivers. Name (prin Signature Citizens Concerned Over Water #144 931061 • in72r 1052 f 1 CLE,,^,r; To TI': 20.7i Please close and remediate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect our surface and ground water, soil, & the Big Thompson & Platte Rivers. Name (print) Signature____ Please close and remediate the pollution at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Protect our surface and ground water, soil, & the Big Thompson & Platte Rivers. Name (print) gw Tb a'it: Signature !l1 r _..1nccJ�- OM4in.ns Concerned Over W.4.r 93106? • • .OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER City of Greeley Weld County Commissioners P.O. Box 758 Greeley, CO 80632 Dear Commissioners: • • 1000 10TH STREET, GREELEY, COLORADO 00631 (303) 350-9770 April 2, 1993 It is my understanding that the Board will be discussing the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill on Monday, April 5, 1993. The continued availability of this conveniently located landfill for the disposal of solid waste generated within the City of Greeley is vital to our residents and businesses. I respectfully request you proceed with the process for considering an amended permit as quickly as possible. Concerns of area residents should be heard and considered, however sudden closure or prolonged delay in issuing an amended permit would be harmful to the economic future of Greeley. If there is any assistance I can provide in this matter, please let me know. Sincerely, oadS Paul M. Grattet City Manager g I -Err L L March 29, 1993 200 Oakridge Trail Kennedale, TX 76060 Weld County/Board of County Commissioners Centennial Center 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Commissioners: This letter is in reference to my position on the disposition of Central Weld County landfill. I feel justified in expressing my position for the landfill's continued operation due to my strong ties to the area, and the four generations of my family that have called the Spomer farm home. This property is immediately adjacent to the landfill. Unlike many of the activist campaigning to close the landfill whose experience with the facility spans weeks or even months, I and my family have lived in intimate contact with the landfill from its inception approximately 21 years ago. The recent change in the landfill management to Waste Management Inc. should be viewed as a very positive event for Weld County and the landfill by all parties. My personal experience with Waste Management at the local government level have shown the company to be extremely professional in dealing with the environmental, technical and public issues associated with the management and disposal of solid waste. Waste Management has recently been awarded the local garbage hauling contract, have completed fabricating a recycling center for curbside programs and have provided a significant contribution towards public education in this area. The presence of a landfill in close proximity to one's home is never a positive thing. However, separating the emotional from the factual issues is essential when making decisions effecting the future of this and similar landfills. Rational, responsible citizens must acknowledge that: • Landfills are a fact of life. • No one wants a landfill close to their home. • Properly managed landfills provide the most economical solution to our solid waste disposal needs. • Locating landfills as close to the waste source reduces cost (transportation, labor and road maintenance) • The Central Weld County landfill is currently in operation, continued operation will not create a new monetary hardship on area properties (property values will not be affected). • Ground water pollution associated with the landfill will not disappear if the landfill were closed. exhih;f Kk de,. ,AA., ,VL, cs 92106' • • • Waste Management Inc. has the expertise and resources not only to control future pollution, but to improve the environmental damage leftover from previous landfill operators. I have confidence that sound judgement will prevail when you, the Commissioners of Weld County must differentiate between reality and fantasy, and facts and emotions and that the taxpayers of Weld County will be provided the opportunity to enjoy the advantages of a professionally operated, economical source for solid waste disposal. Respectfully, Steven V. Hayes 9106" KK • • March 31, 1993 ,o J Weld County Commissioners Connie Harbert Centennial Center 915 10th Street Greeley, CO. 80631 Dear Mrs. Harbert, I would like to point out at least one totally inaccurate statement in C -COW'S flyer distributed in the area last Sunday soliciting support to dose the landfill near our farm. In the third paragraph, second sentence it states that local farmers agreed to the siting of the dump. C -COW knows this is an untruth! Local farmers never agreed nor had any say except to object to the landfill. C -COW knows this. Our concern is the degree of dis-information they are distributing to yourselves and the community. This does give rise to what appears to be a credibility gap on the part of C- COW's position in this matter. Yours truly, j-cz„-Zt_ey Susanne Spomer Stephens 4 -74 - Cie: ft) /z, kids/c5vcs 93106 HAVE A C -COW': BE CONCERNED! GREEELEY-MILLIcN LANDFILL Coloradans - concerned Over Water (C-WGn is a group of concerned Colorado citizens who demand action by their elected representatives to protect public health and the environment. The Greeley -Milliken lard!ill is lccated in a HA7OR DAk12oNGE AREA. 1/2 mile from the Big Thompson River and 1 1/2 miles from the Sark Platte River where the two rivers meet at Dee Rios. DR 1971, the Evans dump had reached capacity and the Greeley -Milliken landfill was proposed. local farms agreed to siting of the dmmp because they were promised it would be only an IIcTERIIC DUN?, AND lab CLOSE NOT LATER THAN 1986, when a new sits would be in operation. =AY, 21 YEARS LATER, the crealey-Milliken dump is still in operation, CMCG LARGER EACH DAY: The landfill continues, and threatens to EXPAND, even though a large, lined and buffered facility in dry lands is located near Ault and another is planned near Yeensburg. The Greeley -Milliken landfill is tAIRwRAT D BY CLOCCORT STANDVLv. Be- cause it was established prior to the do'pion of federal RCRA laws and prior to the adoption of current state regulations, the owners/operators have NEVER FILED AN ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS DESIGN PLAN. The landfill has not been REQUIRED TO SLY 1'O( CIl MC SOLID WWII DISPOSAL IAQSR When the landfill was begun, it was dug BELON THE Qafr4DOC:DR, was =SHED, and SASH WAS LUMPED INTO STANDING WATLJR, all in a major drainage area 1/2 mile from the Big Thompson River. REMEMBER, EVEN Him= rag= SUCH AS PADRT CANS, SOLVENTS, C LINW RS AND GARDEN PESTICIDES CAN FEMME% GROUND AND SURFACE S. n. R IF PIXT D IN UNLINED EUMPI1 33 Tn. Gteeley,NCi t l I Tan &imp has holding ponds on site, which collect water. It also hes deep, dangerous trenches to divert groundwater and surface 'run-off. — 0aNCAHIATYQi FARM HEAVY minis is being detected in neighboring S rigatron-holdi n lakes. The headgates of these lakes are opened, the water leaves the lakes, goes into the irrigation ditches, finds its way through gravel beds and slovens and DUO LYE BIG Ilo iStN AND TE=R INTO THE SOUTH mat. lF ILLS EUMP C ECTI UES 10 GO U} CITCED, contamination of Colorado's surface and greed water will result. The state Department of Health, through its Solid and Hazardous Waste Division and the Division of Water Quality BEST BE URGED TO INVESTICAYE THE sae OF IBIS CONTAMINATION! PUBLIC ATTETTIaN AND PUBLIC FIEAR121 s must focus on this facility so that it is closed and any resulting o .amiration is treated. 93106' C PLOMA); Ii1.171 On kilt/7111y b.aWrrMA p pw sa -ms I %u GREELEY/ WELD March 31, 1993 Ms. Connie Harbert Chairperson Weld County Commissioners Centennial Building 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Ms. Harbert, The availability of a regional state-of-the-art solid waste management facility is important to the retention and attraction of industry to Weld County. At a recent meeting of the Executive Committee of the Greeley/Weld Economic Development Acton Partnership (MAP), we reaffirmed the above statement and endorsed the process of re -permitting the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. We encourage the Weld County Commissioners to favorably consider the re -permitting of the subject facility. Respectfully, Karen Sekich Chairperson GREELYAVELD ECONOMIC DEVEIOPMENI P. O. Box S 510 9th Street Greeley, Colorado POb32 303/356-4565 la% 701/152-2416 Ex h%h,--f 1 cc NL1 A/_, zdcs/e Sbcs ■r■� r 921061 • • -'I March 29, 1993 Ms. Connie Harbert, Chairperson Weld County Commissioners Centennial Center 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80632 S:3 Dear Ms. Harbert, I am troubled by a situation involving Waste Management/ Waste Services. I live on the property adjacent to the Central Weld Landfill on the north side and I am in constant awareness of their presence. The loud large machinery operates non-stop from 7:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. Flocks of seagulls swarm the trash and are warded off by the sounds of loud flares throughout the day. That only sends them flying over our home which is very annoying. The landfill also is in an area that receives high wind gusts causing the trash to blow out of the landfill to adjoining properties. The machinery is constantly kicking up great amounts of dirt/particulates and spewing it into the air during their daily operations. In fact, truck load after truck load of petroleum contaminated soils are dumped here and by evening it is spread over the days trash. What about spewing the particulates from these contaminated soils into the air? What happened to the aeration process of accepting these soils? This landfill should have quit operations by 1986 but it seems to still be going strong. How can that be since they have never submitted all of the paperwork for their plan and design and procedures of operation? The only way to expand is if they go up using air space and build a mountain of trash. The original guidelines promised all surrounding landowners that nothing like that would happen - the landfill would blend nicely into the surrounding area. Some points are already 100 feet higher than the original historical elevation of the land and there is a very dangerous trench around the North and East sides of the landfill. They are going about operations as though everything is oak. and approved. They have accelerated operations in the last couple of months and have been adding to the height of this thing with- out any approval from anyone: How can that be?! Who is monitoring who? It is extemely unjust that a large mega company with a lot of money can get ahead simply because they have the monies. W@ the little guys,landowners that want to protect what we have get stomped on because of our lack of funds to fight back. The state and county are in charge to keep these businesses in check. This whole situation would be similar to applying for a permit for a small convenience store and over time building a strip mall Exhih, / /11'! CC '62 / /14, Zia _s/eSvCS 9106:' SI% • • without any approved permits! The location of this dump is WRONG: Irrigation water surges through and around the landfill in summer and it's located in the middle of a natural drainage area. Keeping this landfill in operation only compounds the problem already at hand. It is contaminating the surrounding waters, the most susceptible source is the nearby Big Thompson River only 4 mile away. Why in the world would we jeopardize our local sources of water? As my husband and I have been saying lately - this landfill is not needed, not in compliance, not safe and not wanted: Please listen to the citizens of this community - especially the ones who care about the future of our children and our environment. We want this landfill cleaned up and closed. It is ridiculous to believe that Waste Management should have another 14 plus years to keep operating an unsafe dump while at the same time cleaning up the contamination. Common sense says that a clean up is needed without adding more trash to an already bad situation. There are more than enough landfillsto accomodate the trash being generated by Weld County residents. Just to name two that are close in proximity are the Ault and Keenesburg landfills. Ms. Harbert, you are our representative in this matter as we are in your district. With all of the recent articles in the local papers regarding this landfill I am surprised you have not contacted us nor visited the landfill with a repre- sentative of our group. Our neighborhood action group has addressed inquiries from all of the other Weld County Commissioners and we certainly would welcome the opportunity to show you the other side of the story. The Ashton -Daniels Neighborhood Association has been working hard at discovering the facts and uncovering the facts. We deserve a fair chance to be heard. Thank you. Sincerely, / Ann Hayes 8200 W. 49th Street Greeley, CO 80634 (303)330-8726 Copies: Governor Romer Senator Hank Brown Weld County Health Dept. Congressman Wayne Allard Senator Tom Norton Dr. Patricia Nolan, CDH Barbara Taylor, WQCD Roger DoaZ CDH µ(-t 931061 a • Many of W'MI's "state-of-the-art. landfill designs employ a double -layer high -density polyethylene (HDPE) liner with leachate collection piping be- tween. In 1990 WMI purchased a minority interest in National Smeal, a privately held landfill liner manufacturer. (670) According to the Phillips Petroleum Company, a leading maker of polyethylene, there are a number of chemicals that can weaken polyethylene landfill liners. (628) Liners made out of clay also leak due to the ability of organic chemicals to permeate clay and shrinkage and ex- pansion from varying weather conditions. (632) CWM has also sought to weaken regulations governing hazardous waste landfills. On April 24, 1989, CWM won a decision from the U.S. Ap- pellate Court to drop a provision in regulations issued under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act's "first -third" land -ban rule, a decision that effectively weakened leachate treatment standards. (633) CWM currently operates seven hazardous waste landfills in the U.S., including the nation's largest in Ernelle, Alabama. What follows is a chronology of problems at CWM's hazardous waste landfills. CWM;s eroding CID landfill in Chicago's Southeast Side. Emelle, .11“:0 t a .dti.,;v4 44 ..[-r.. iL+ jA-, L'C.w�il {i akka L i 4&Z0— at— lateri e t_ ---Gsfo.cf 4!z r,7 Ea <cM 92106a • • Attr, fEt'YIORAIIDUm Board of County Commissioners April 1, 1993 To pit. COLORADO John Pickle, Healy From Hearing - Central Weld Sanitary Landfill Subject: The Central Weld Sanitary Landfill has been in operation at least since 1971. Waste Services Corporation took over the operation in 1989 and merged with Waste Management of Colorado, Inc., in 1991. The site has been monitored over the years by the Colorado Department of Health, as well as Weld County Health Department. Our Department has tried to maintain an inspection frequency of at least four visits per year. In addition, our laboratory sampled Central Weld's monitoring wells until the discovery of Volatile Organics indicated a more sophisticated monitoring program was necessary. In July of 1992, I met with Bill Hedberg of Waste Services at this facility. At that meeting we discussed the history of groundwater problems at this site and Waste Management's efforts to control them to date. Mr. Hedberg also informed me at that meeting that Waste Management's Laboratory had discovered low levels of contaminants in several downgradient monitoring wells and that a full written report would be forthcoming. He asked that in light of these findings Central Weld be allowed to discontinue its agreement with Weld County for monitoring, and contract with a more sophisticated laboratory. I readily agreed with this proposal since our lab could not test for Volatile Organic Compounds. As clarification for the Board, Volatile Organic Compounds are contaminants commonly from landfill leachate, as well as underground storage tanks, agricultural runoff, and other sources. VOCs are common constituents in industrial and household solvents pesticides, and other chemical products. Toxicological studies have shown that some of these organics have the potential for carcinogenesis in human beings. Consequently, their presence in the groundwater is of public health concern. In August, 1992, we received the Hydrogeologic and Geotechnical Characterization for the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, Weld County Colorado. After review and discussion with Colorado Department of Health personnel, we cited the Central Weld facility in October, 1992. (See attached Report and letters of August 17, and October 5, 1992.) Waste Management performed confirmation sampling at the Central Weld facility in September, 1992. The results confirmed previous findings submitted in the Hydrogeological Characterization of July. (See attached Central Weld Sanitary Landfill Confirmation Groundwater Sampling, October, 1992.) Golder Associates Inc. performed an Expanded Hydrogeological Investigation at the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, Colorado in October, 1992. The purpose of this Exhi6if66- 9106.": investigation was to determine the extent of migration of the VOCs offsite. (See attached Expanded Hydrogeological Investigation.) Since October, subsequent inspections, discussions with Colorado Department of Health personnel, and meetings with Waste Management have culminated in Weld County Health Department citing the Central Weld facility for four (4) violations, and requesting this Hearing. The Department contends that Central Weld Sanitary Landfill is in non-compliance with existing rules in the following areas: 1. The operators of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill have not submitted a complete Design and Operations Plan. There is some question as to whether or not this was a requirement at the time this facility was permitted. Such a report was required in the 1971 Amendments to the Solid Waste Act prior to the hearing by the Board of County Commissioners, but the Act requires such a report only "as may be required by the [State Health] Department by regulation." The State appears to have decided that no report was necessary as they treated the landfill as a grandfathered site. Regardless of the State's position, it appears that the Board of County Commissioners expected such a review and that one never occurred. A review of the files does not show that there ever has been an "approval" by the State Health Department. The Board of County Commissioners requested a Design and Operations Plan for this facility by November 12, 1992. A partial submission was made by Waste Management. After review, this submission was considered incomplete. (See attached letter of February 22, 1993.) To date, the additional documentation has not been submitted. This is a violation of 30-20-103, Colorado Revised Statutes. (Copy attached) 2. The Central Weld Sanitary Landfill continues to operate without required Discharge Permits. This fact is documented in letters from Waste Management, November 16, 1992, and Colorado Department of Health, November 17, 1992. (Attached) Colorado Department of Health, Water Quality Division personnel have indicated that despite application for the required permits, the facility is in technical violation of the rules, but they are holding further enforcement in abeyance so long as the facility continues in good faith with the application process. Weld County Health Department agrees that this is a violation of Subsection 2.1.2 of the Solid Waste Regulations and 25-8-501, Colorado Revised Statutes, (Attached), but it appears this condition is near final correction. 3. The Central Weld Sanitary Landfill continues to contaminate the groundwater, and this contamination has migrated offsite. This fact is evidenced by Waste Management in two documents: The Hydrogeologic and Geotechnical Characterization for the Central Weld Sanitary 92106' z • • Landfill, July 1992, pages 41, 42, 55, and 57; and the Expanded Hydrogeological Investigation at the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, Colorado, pages 5, and 6. The Department feels that this is a violation of Subsections 2.1.2 of the Solid Waste Regulations, specifically, 3.11.5 of the Water Quality Commission Rules, and 2.1.4 of the Solid Waste Regulations. That this is a violation of 2.1.4 is also indicated in a letter from Colorado Department of Health to Waste Management dated December 21, 1992, specifically page 4, paragraph C.1. (Attached) That this is a violation is also further indicated in an Attorney General's Opinion dated March 5, 1993. (Attached) 4. The Central Weld Sanitary Landfill has allowed solid waste to come into contact with groundwater on this site. This is documented in the Hydrogeologic and Geotechnical Characterization for the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, July, 1992, page 34. This condition results in the production of leachate, a source of groundwater pollution and public nuisance. This is a violation of Subsection 2.1.4 of the Solid Waste Regulations. In addition, this too is indicated in the Attorney General's Opinion dated March 5, 1993. An inspection by our staff on March 2, 1993, indicated that the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill is still in non-compliance in the areas referenced above. Further, the Weld County Health Department and the Colorado Department of Health feel that items #3 and #4 constitute a public nuisance. We would ask that the Board of County Commissioners find that, on balance, there are sufficient facts shown to justify proceeding with a Show Cause Hearing. 9;106' • 3 a 'F ria Solder Associates Inc. 200 Union BOU10/07CL Sues 100 tCuewooc. CO USA 80228 TS o Wne(303)980-0540 Tyr (303) 985-2080 HYDROGEOLOGIC MD GEOTECUNICAL CHARACTERIZATION FOR THE aNFRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFALL WELD COUNTY, COLORADO VOLUME I Prepared for: Waste Services Corporation 6037 77th Avenue Greeley, CO 80634 Prepared by: Golder Associates Inc. 200 Union Boulevani. Suite 100 Lakewood, CO 80228 (303) 980-0540 , IuEy 1992 913-2403 OFRCES IN AUSTRALIA, CANADA. GERMANY HUNGA(rV. rimy, SWEDEN. UNITED 4NGCCM. UNITED STATES ( July 1992 -5- 913-2403 Information contained in the State Engineer's files can occasionally be outdated. The Central Weld Water District and Little Thompson Water District were contacted to determine if a public water supply has been extended to the area south of the landfill. Based on information supplied by the water district personnel, a public water supply has not been extended to the area. An additional permitted well is located east of the landfill (Figure 1-5). The depth of this well has not been reported to the Colorado State Engineer. However, based on available information this well is not downgradient of the landfill. 1.3.5 Site History Landfill operations may have begun at the site as early as 1967. The original Certificate of Designation (CD) for the site was issued by Weld County to Earl Moffat on October 6, 1971. Browning Ferris Industries (BFI) operated the site until 1976; it is not known when operational responsibility was transferred from Mr. Moffat to EFL Ralph and Barbara Roweder (Weld Landfill, Inc.) operated the site from 1976 until Tune of 1979, when interest in the property was sold to Mr. C. Lynn Keirnes, of Colorado Landfill, Inc. The site was subsequently owned and operated by Waste Services Inc. from December, 1985 until 1989 (under Lynn IC:lines). In 1989, Waste Services, Inc. became Waste Services Corp. (WSC) under Mr. Brad Keirnes. On July 12, 1991 WSC merged with Waste Management of Colorado, Inc. (WMC), an operating division of Waste Management of North America (WMNA). The facility is on the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) list due to alleged disposal of pesticide and radioactive waste during the period 1973 to 1976. Placement on this list indicates that the site is under investigation for inclusion on the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) National Priority List (NPL). A preliminary assessment of the site was conducted in 1987 by the Colorado Department of Health (CDH). Through review of Weld County Health Department records and an on -site investigation, the CDH found no groundwater, surface water, or air contamination. s Golder Associates 92196.1 • July 1992 -E- 913-2403 The site currently accept only solid waste and spatial wastes including petroleum contaminated soils and non -friable asbestos. Liquid sludges and hazardous wastes are not accepted. The two primary areas yet to be landfilled include the northeastern and southeastern portions of the site. A residence is located in the eastern portion of the site. The residence must be removed prior to Iand+,tting in this area. 1.4 previous Invpstisations Previous investigations at the site include: ► Warzyn Engineering Inc., 1984,"Hydrogeologic Assessment, Greeley Landfill, Weld County, Colorado? Industrial Compliance. 1991, "Ground -Water Investigation, Waste Services Corporation, Central Weld Sanitary Landfill." The Warzyn, 1984, report was based on a field investigation program which consisted of installing five shallow groundwater monitoring wells (GWMW-1 through GWMW-5), conducting in -situ permeability tests, and water quality (groundwater and surface water) sampling. The geology, bydrogeology, and water quality of the site were evaluated in this report. The Industrial Compliance, 1991, report involve characterizing the site for the potential of leachate and methane generation. In addition, an evaluation of the conceptual design of a diversion ditch was presented. The field investigation involved the installation of seven trash piezometers (17-1 through TP-7) and installation of piezometers (P-1 through P-10). The locations of previous data collection points are presented on Figure 1-6. The nth piezometers remain active monitoring points and were utilized during this investigation. Eight of the 10 piezometers installed by Industrial Compliance were decommissioned during construction of the diversion trench. Piezometers P-1 and P-2 remain active and are included in this report GG- GolderAssociates SMOG: July 1992 -33- 913-2403 diversion tench, a claystone unit is present at a relatively shallow depth in this area. Groundwater was observed seeping into the trench from the soil/claystone contact. Evidently, the claystone unit in this area is acting as a barrier to downward migration of water and is resulting in perched conditions east of the trench. The perched water is probably maintained at an artificially high level due to irrigation activities known to occur immediarrly north and east of the landfill. The irrigation activities rely provide increased recharge to the groundwater east of the trench. According to landfill employees, the water level east of the trench, as observed at the east wall of the trench, rises a few feet during the irrigation season. A similar rise is not observed along the western wall of the trench, since irrigation does not occur on the landfill. 4.3.3 jcweryenthergli3erock Deep groundwater monitoring wells GWMW-8 through GWMW-14 were screened within the Lower Weathered Bedrock. Adjacent shallow wells screened within the Upper Weathered Bedrock indicate a saturated zone in the upper portion of the Upper Weathered Bedrock. The deep wells indicate a saturated zone within the upper portion of the Lower Weathered Bedrock. During drilling a relatively dry zone was noted within the Upper Weathered Bedrock. The presence of the dry material suggests that the degree of communication between the shallow and deep saturated zones is minimal. Figure 4-2 is a contour map of the deep groundwater potettiotnenic surface. Based on information presented in Figure 4-2, the direction of groundwater flow in that zone is towards the south-southeast. The average horizontal grotutdwater gradient in the lower groundwater zone is approximately 0.02 ft./ft.. Assuming an effective porosity of 30% (Freeze and Cherry, 1979) and a hydraulic conductivity of 2.5x10^' cm/sec (Section 5.1.1), the average horizontal groundwater flow velocity is calculated to be approximately 2 feet per year. Golder Associates 93106: 7 July 1992 -34- 913-2403 4.4 Vertical Groundwater Bow Seven deep/shallow well pairs exist at the site. At the upgradient well pairs, downward vertical gradients exist (-0.40 to -0.30). Well pairs near Spomer Lakes exhibit slight downward to upward gradients (-0.11 to +0.01). At the downgradient well pair which is not near Spomer Lakes (GWMW-I2 and GWMW-5N) a slight downward gradient exists (-0.014). Table 4-2 is a summary of vertical gradients at the well pain. The slight gradients at the well pairs adjacent to Sportier Ickes may indicate that the lakes are locally recharging groundwater. It should be noted that the vertical gradient may change seasonally. 4.5 Dg41h to Groundwater in LapdfilIed Areas As mentioned in Section 1.4, seven crash piezomerers (17P-1 through TP-7) were installed in 1991 under the supervision of Industrial Compliance Inc. (IC). The purpose of these piezometers was to drlinrite depths and thicknesses of refuse. IC icyurn d that groundwater was above the base of trash in piezometers TP-1 and' -6 at heights ranging of 1.92 feet and 0.42 feet, respectively. In addition, IC made recommendations concerning the conceptual design of the groundwater collection/diversion ditch located along the northern and eastern edges of the landfilL The purpose of this ditch was to control groundwater levels below the landfill. As part of the recent field investigation, water levels were measured in all of the trash piezometers in order to evaluate the effectiveness of the groundwater collection/diversion ditch. Table 4-3 summarizes the water levels measured in the trash piezometers with respect to base of solid waste as reported by IC in their 1991 report. Groundwater was present above the base of solid waste at only one location, piezometer TP-1, where groundwater was 6.34 feet above the base of solid waste. As shown on Figure 2-1, TP-1 is located near the northwest corner of the site. In this vicinity, the groundwater collecton/diversion ditch is unlined, potentially resulting in local recharge in the area of TP-1. 66 - Odder Associates 9;1461 July 1992 -38- 913-2403 A core sample containing both fine-grained and coarse -grained materials was tested in order to obtain a value for permeability of the two units acting together. The resultant value for this sample is 2x104 cm/sec. The relatively low permeability of this sample indicates that the fine- grained materials exert a pronounced influence on vertical permeabilities. Based on data provided by Industrial Compliance 1991, the base of the landfill apparently rests on Upper Weathered Bedrock Therefore, the permeability values for the Upper Weathered Bedrock unit have significant implications regarding potential contaminant migration. The permeability of these materials ranged from 3x10' cm/sec to 4x101 cm/sec. These art relatively low permeabilities and suggest that the Upper Weathered Bedrock unit would likely act as a significant bather to downward migration of contaminants. 5.5 Geochemical Characteristics Geochemical characteristics of geologic materials at the site were evaluated by Analytica Laboratory of Golden, Colorado for Cation Exchange Capacity (CEC) and pH. The CEC evaluation was performed to assess the contaminant attenuation potential of the Upper Weathered Bedrock and the Surficial Unconsolidated material. The evaluation of pH was performed in order to assess the CRC values as they apply to the site, since CRC is strongly dependent upon VI An additional motivation for pH testing is a cursory assessment of the ability of the soil to act as a buffer to and leachate drainage. 5.5.1 Cation Exchange Capacity The CEC of geologic material is a measure of the ability of that material to adsorb exchangeable cations. It can therefore be used as a measure of the ability to attenuate the migration of some contaminants, primarily inorganic contaminants, by adsorption of exchangeable cations. Clay minerals have, to varying degrees depending on the particular mineralogy, a high qty to adsorb specific inorganic solutes because of large surface arras and numerous exchange sites. GG Golder Associates 9106? 9 July 1992 -39- 913-2403 In general certain metals including lead, cadmium, mercury and zinc are particularly susceptible to attenuation. Potassium, ammonia, magnesium, silicon and iron are moderately attenuated. Sodium is weakly attenuated. Divalent cations are gaierally more readily adsorbed than monovalent. cations. Cations are more strongly adsorbed than anions. Conservative solutes such as chloride are not attenuated. CEC is typie ally reported in terms of millie quivalemt per 100 yams of dry mass (meq/100g). In order to evaluate CEC and pH at the site, 5 samples were submitted for testing. Four of the samples were of the Upper Weathered Bedrock and one sample was of the Surficial Unconsolidated silty clay. Upper Weathered Bedrock samples were favored since base of solid waste is estimated to be typically within the Upper Weathered Bedrock unit. Two of the samples were from upgradient soil gas wells (SG -16, SG -20) and three of the samples were from downgradient soil gas wells (SG -3, SG -6 and SO4). Table 5-3 presents the results of the CEC and pH analyses. Values for CEC range from 18.3 meq/100g to 37.3 meq/100g. Based on these results, the materials at the site have the potential to attenuate the migration of inorganic contaminants. 5.5.2 12117=15.17B The same five samples submitted for CEC analysis were also analyzed for pH. The pH of material underlying the site has a direct bearing upon the CEC of the materiaL The laboratory procedure for CEC testing involves neutralizing the material (pH of 7.0). In a low pH environment a greater percentage of Hydrogen ions (H+) are present. These H+ ions limit the exchange sites available and therefore lower the CEC. The pH values reported for the Central Weld site range from 7.5 to 7.9. Since the reported pH values are close to neutral the CEC values reported by laboratory testing should closely mimic those relative to field conditions. The pH of a geologic material is an indicator of the all Jinity of the material which in turn governs the ability of that material to buffer acid leachate. The range of pH values reported (7.5 to 7.9) are just slightly basic. Golder Associates 92106f ' /G r11 July 1992 40- 913-2403 6.0 RESULT$Q' WATER OUALITY ANALYSES Water quality samples were collected at the Central Weld site in March 1992 from eight shallow monitoring wells, seven deep monitoring wells, and three surface water sampling sites. Several quality assurance (QA) samples were also collected: a field duplicate, a field blank, a trip blank, and laboratory blanks. Procedures used to collect the field duplicate, field black, and trip blank samples are described in Section 2.6. In addition, laboratory blanks were prepared and analyzed by the laboratory during sample analysis. Laboratory blanks were prepared by the laboratory and were analyzed without leaving the laboratory. Laboratory blank samples were analyzed concurrently with field samples to provide an indication of contamination introduced at the laboratory. Analysis of laboratory blanks was sporadic. Several laboratory blanks were analyzed for a particular type of analysis (e.g., volatile organics), while no laboratory blanks were analyzed for other types of analyses (e.g., nutrients). This is typical for laboratory blanks and does not adversely impact the quality of the darn. The samples were analyzed by Enseco/focky Mountain Analytical Laboratory in Arvada, Colorado. The following parameters were analyzed: ► Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs); ► Pesticides and Herbicides; ► Trace Metals; • Nutrients; ► Major Anions and Cations; and, ► Radionuclides and Radioactivity. 6-6 Golder Associates 92106" /1 July 1992 -41- 913-2403 A discussion of the laboratory results is provided below. Laboratory analytical results are included in Appendix I. 6.1 Volatile Orjnic Compounds A total of 34 volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were analyzed in the water quality samples (Table 6-1). Of these, eight VOCs were detected in one or more of the samples. These are: ► Acetone; ► 1,1-Dichloroethane; • 1,2-Dichloroethane; ► 1,2-Dichloroethene; ► 1,2-Dichloropropane; • Methylene chloride; ► Trichloroethcne; arid, ► Tetrachloroethane. The volatile organic compounds that were detected and their concentrations axe a,mmarized in Table 6-2. VOCs were detected in five monitoring wells: GOVMV 2,,GS-4; (-5N, and GWMW-7. All of these wells are completed in the shallow aquifer. With the exception of GWMW-2, each of these wells is looted downgradient of the land9L Monitoring well GWMW-2 is looted upgradient of the landa Figures 4-1A and 4-1B show the location of the wells and the inferied direction of groundwater flow in the shallow aquifer. YQCs were lsw detected in one of the stufaee coin r sam�Irs, LF-UD co acted fpm. the outlet ofthe tliartdElI underdrain. No VOCs were detected in the surface water samples collected from Golder Associates 92106f. 0, July 1992 -42- 913-2403 the steel culvert which drains the off -site area as the north property botmdary (N -Discharge) and the inlet of the retention pond (RP -Inlet). VOCs were not detected in the field blank. Methylene chloride was detected in the trip blank and sample GWMW-7. Two VOCs were detected in the laboratory blanks: acetone, and methylene chloride. Both of these compounds am common laboratory contaminants. Acetone was detected in sample GWMW-2. Based on the laboratory and trip blank results, acetone and methylene chloride are present as a result of laboratory contamination and do not accurately reflect impacts from the landfill. Following is a list of detected volatile organic compounds, the range of concennradons at the site, and their corresponding drinking water standards: Compound Range of Conceritradon (mg/I) State of Colorado Standard (mgil) Federal Standard (n18/1) 1,1-Dicbloroethane 1,2-Dichioroethane 1,2-Dichloroethene 1,2-Dichloropropane Trichloroethane Trichlorocthene <0.005 to 0.0059 <0.005 to 0.018 <0.005 to 0.026 <0.005 to 0.0066 <0.005 to 0.070 <0.005 to 0.210 N/A 0.005'; 0.00042 0.12 0.562 0.005'; 0.0052 0.0052 N/A 0.005' 0.07' 0.005' 0.005' 0.005` Standard shown for 1,2-dichloroethene is representative of cis-1,2-dichloroethene. State Standarit 1: Colorado Drinking Water Standards, CCR Title 5 2: Colorado Ground Water Standards, CCR Tide 5 isicaLlIandana 3: Currently applicable standard promulgated under the Safe Drinking Water Act, 40 CFR 141 4: Safe Drinking Water Act Standard to become effective on July 30, 1992. 6- 9u106f. /3 7uly 1992 43- 913-2403 Based on the information presented above, the maximum detected concentration of 1,2- dichloroetpane,1,2-dichloropropane,trichloroethene,and ererrreniteither aState of Colorado or federal standards. The maximum concentration of each of these compounds was exhibited by shallow groundwater on the downgradieat site of the landfill in monitoring wells MW -4, MW -5, or MW -5N (Table 6-1). All detected concentrations of 1,2-dichloroethene are below State and federal standards. No standards have been established for 1,1-dichloroethane. 6.2 pesticides andJTetbicides The water quality samples were analyzed for four pesticides (Endrin, Lindane, Methozychior, and Toxaphene) and two herbicides (2,4-O and 2,4,5 -Ti' (Silver)). No pesticides or herbicides were detected in any of the water quality samples analyzed. 6.3 Trace Metals Ten trace metals were analyzed in the water quality samples: arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, iron, lead, manganese, mercury, selenium and silver. Of these, five trace metals (barium, cadmium, chromium, iron and manganese) were detected in one or more of the samples. The detected concentrations for these trace metals are summarized in Table 6-3. The following paragraphs discuss the five detected trace metals. Buiura, iron, and/or manganese were detected t seven of the nine shallow monitoring wdLrand,, in each of the deep monitoring wells and surface water sample Cadmium and"cnromtum were only detectai in one sample; which was collected from deep -monitoring we1L 12.. This appears to be an isolated occurrence. No trace metals were detected in the field blank or in the laboratory blank analyzed for this set of samples. As is typical, the trip blank sample was not analyzed for metals. Golder Associates 9106:' 4/ C • July 1992 -44- 913-2403 Barium concentrations ranged from <0.010 to 0.043 mg/I. There was no significant difference between the concentration of barium in the shallow and deep monitoring wells or between upgradient and downgradienc sampling sites. This suggests that barium detected in the samples is originating from natural, geologic sources. The detected barium concentrations were all below the current primary drinidng water standard of 1.0 mg/I established by the EPA and the State of Colorado. Iron concentrations ranged from <0.10 to 0.87 mg/I. The secondary standard for iron established by the EPA and State of Colorado is 0.3 mg/I. Iron was only detected in the deep monitoring wells and the surface water samples. The presence of iron in the deep monitoring wells but not the shallow monitoring wells suggests that groundwater in the deeper aquifer is chemically under reducing (anaerobic) conditions whereas groundwater the shallow aquifer is under oxidizing (aerobic) conditions. Iron is nearly insoluble in waters that are oxygenated and not acidic but can be quite soluble in near neutral or basic waters that are void of oxygen. Field water quality measurements indicated that groundwater from both the shallow and deep aquifers at the site is, in act, near neutral or basic. The:presence of iron in site surface waters, expected to be well aerated and therefore insoluble to iron, is probably explained from particulates entrained in the samples during collection. Surface water samples for trace metals were not filtered when collected which could explain the source of particulate matter in the samples. Any iron in the particulates would have become dissolved into the water during sample preservation. Manganese concentrations ranged from <0.010 to 1.7 mg/1. The secondary standard for manganese established by the EPA and State of Colorado is 0.05 mg/1. Manganese was detected in the surface water samples, the shallow monitoring wells, and the deep monitoring wells. Concentrations of manganese were generally higher in the deep monitoring wells. In fact, the maximum detected concentration of manganese was exhibited by deep monitoring well GWMW- 8, located on the upgradient side of the landfill. Geochemically, manganese behaves very similar to iron. This probably explains the difference in manganese concentrations between the deep and shallow aquifers. -Ia.() A4 C.o e h Cr1/4ro„,:..4 G tci ist ui - Golder Associates 92106? /.S July 1992 -45- 913-2403 6.4 $utrtents Two common nutrients, nitrate and ammonia, were analyzed in the water quality samples. Nutrient concentrations are summarized in Table 6-4. Ammonia was detected in six of the seven deep monitoring wells but in none of the shallow monitoring wells or surface water samples. Ammonia is a common groundwater constituent in areas of agricultural activity. Ammonia is chemically unstable in water under oxidizing conditions common in surface waters and shallow aquifers. This may explain why it was not detected either in the site surface waters or in the shallow aquifer. The presence of ammonia in groundwater from the deeper aquifer suggests that this aquifer is under reducing conditions and may be impacted by agricultural activities upgtadient of the landfill. There is currently no EPA or State of Colorado standard for ammonia. Nitrate was detected in all but one of the samples and ranged in concentration from 0.11 to 18.5 mg/1 as N. Two samples (GWMW-2 and N -Discharge) exceeded the EPA and State of Colorado drinking water standard for nitrate of 10 mg/I as N. Monitoring well GWIAW-2 is completed upgradient of the landfill in the shallow aquifer and surface water sampling site N -discharge is looted along the northern Landfill boundary adjacent to agricultural land. Nitrate levels were consistently higher in the shallow monitoring wells and surface water =pies than the deep monitoring wells, suggesting that nitrate is originating from agricultural activities near the landfill. This interpretation is consistent with the finding of Industrial Compliance, Inc. (1991). Neither nitrate nor ammonia were detected in the field blank. The trip blank was not analyzed for nitrate or ammonia. 6.5 Major Anions and Cations The following major anions and cations were analyzed in the water quality samples: calcium, magnesium, potassium, sodium, alkalinity (bicarbonate and carbonate), chloride, and sulfate. Golder Associates 92106:. /6 July 1992 913-2403 The results of these analyses are presented on a trilinear diagram on Figure 6-1. Sample concentrations are designated on the diagram as a percentage of the total ration and anion concentrations measured in each sample. Note that the samples have been divided into three general groups based on their source_ surface water, shallow monitoring wells and, deep monitoring wells. The position of the samples on the tilinear diagram indicates that all of the samples have a similar chemical signature and probably cannot be distinguished based on their major anion and cation data alone. Based on the predominant cation and anion measured, the samples classify as either calcium -sulfate or magnesium -sulfate waters. Most of the samples exceeded the secondary drinking water standard for sulfate of 250 mg/1. 6.6 Radionuclides and Radioactivity Two radionuclides (Radium 226 and 228) and two measures of radioactivity (Gross Alpha and Gross Beta) were analyzed in each of the water quality samples. The results of these analyses are summarized in Table 6-5. Two samples exceeded the EPA and State of Colorado drinking water standard for combined Radium 226 and 228 of 5 pCa/L Both samples were collected upgradient of the landfill, one from shallow monitoring well GWMW-3 and the other from deep monitoring well GWMW-10. Combined Radium 226/228 activities for the other samples ranged from 0.3 to 4.9 pall and averaged 2.0 pCi/1. There was no significant difference between the activities of groundwater samples upgradient and downgradient of the landfill, suggesting that the landfill does not act as a source of radioactivity. Fifteen of the eighteen groundwater and surface water samples exceeded the EPA and State of Colorado drinking water standard for Gross Alpha activity of 15 pCC/L Gross Alpha activities ranged front 11 to 180 pCi/1 and averaged 49.3 pCi/L The highest activities were measured in GG Golder Associates 92106' /7 July 1992 -47- 913-2403 the shallow monitoring wells. It should be noted that there was no significant difference between the activities of groundwater samples upgrade= and downgrade= of the landfill, suggesting that the landfill does not act as a son of radioactivity. Gross Ben activities ranged from 0.0 to 71 pa/land avenged 33.8 pCi/1. Similar to the Gross Alpha results, Gross Beta activities were generally higher in the shallow monitoring wells than the deep monitoring wells with no significant difference between upgrade= and downgradient wells. A standard for Gross Beta has not been eablished by the EPA or State of Colorado. The source of radionuclides and radioactivity in the samples appears to be natural and is probably related to native geologic materials occurring beneath the site. Overall, there was no significant difference between sample activities upgradient and downgradient of the landfill. Low activities of Gross Alpha (0.8 pCi/1) and Gross Bea (1.6 pCi/l) were detected in the field blank. The tip blank was not analysed for radionuclides or radioactivity. No laboratory blanks were analyzed for radionuclides or radioactivity. GG- Golder Associates 92196!. /f July 1992 -53- 913-2403 8.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 'This "Hydrogeologic and Geotechnical Characterization Report" was prepared to provide Waste Services Corporation (WSC) with a comprehensive evaluation of the geology, hydrogeology, and geochemical conditions at the Central Weld Saniary Landfill. The information presented in this report will be the basis for developing environmental monitoring systems for groundwater, surface water, and landfill gas. The remainder of this section presents summaries and conclusions regarding site conditions. 8.1 Geology Three geologic units have been identified at the site. They are herein referred to as the Surfic ial Unconsolidated Unit, the Upper Weathered Bedrock and the Lower Weathered Bedrock The Surfidal Unconsolidated Unit is an eolian silty day to clayey silt which ranges in thickness from a few feet to nearly 30 feet The Surficial Unconsolidated Unit exhibits considerable lateral and vertical homogeneity. The Upper Weathered Bedrock is comprised of interiaminared and interbedded silty fine sandstone and claystone. The unit is typically yellowish brown, is poorly indurated and varies laterally across the site. The thidness of the unit ranges from approximately 40 to 70 feet. The Lower Weathered Bedrock is comprised of intedaminated and interbedded, medium to dark grey, silty fine sandstone and claystone. The unit is slightly less weathered than the Upper Weathered Bedrock. Thickness of the Lower Weathered Bedrock was not determined as part of this study. Golder Associates 9 1o6f / 9 July 1992 -54- 913-2403 8.2 Hvdroeeoloev Three saturated zones, a perched zone, a shallow groundwater zone, and a deep groundwater zone, were encountered in this study. Each is discussed below. Perched Zone A perched zone is inferred to exist east of the diversion trench along the northeastern perimeter of the site. The perched zone rests on top of a claystone unit and receives recharge from irrigation. The irrigation results in seasonal water level rises of a few feet in the perched water. Irrigation does not occur on the landfill. Therefore, perched waters are not evident within the landfilled arras. Shallow Saturated Zone The shallow saturated zone occurs near the top of the Upper Weathered Bedrock. Direction of flow in the shallow saturated zone is to the south-southwest. The average horizontal gradient across the site is approxinnraty 0.03 ft/ft.. Avenge horizontal groundwater flow velocity is approximately 95 feet per year. In one localized area, the shallow saturated zone extends above the base of the landfill. This is evidently the result of infiltration through the diversion trench which extends along the northern boundary of the landfill. The satutazal refuse may be an avenue for contaminant migration into the shallow groundwater system. Deep Saturated Zone The deep saturated zone occurs within the lower portion of the Upper Weathered Bedrock and the upper portion of the Lower Weathered Bedrock. Dirttion of flow is to the south-southeast. GG GoIdsrAsrociat s 9.:106:t ,2D July 1992 -55- 913-2403 The average horizontal gradient across the site is approximately 0.02 ft./ft.. Average horizontal groundwater flow velocity is approximately 11 feet per year. During dialling, a relatively dry zone approximately 5 to 10 feet thick was generally noted between the shallow gxoumdwatet and the deep groundwater: The presence of the dry zone suggests that the degree of communication between the shallow and deep groundwater systems is rninimal. Vertical Groundwater Flow Downward vertical gradients exist at the shallow/deep well pairs across the site except near Spomer Lakes where weak downward to slightly upward gradients have been calculated. Apparently the lakes are locally contributing a constant head recharge to the groundwater. 8.3 Water Quality Water quality samples were collected from all of the groundwater monitoring wells and from three surface water sampling points. The following parameters wee analyzed: • Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC); • Pesticides and Herbicides; • Trace Metals; • Nutrients; • Major Anions and Caaons;and, ▪ Radionuclides and Radioactivity. Volatile organic compounds were detected in four downgradient shallow groundwater monitoring wells (GWMW-4, GWMW-5, GWMW SN and GWMW-7), upgradient monitoring well GWMW-2, and in the surface water sample front the landfill underdrain (LP -OD). The only VOC detected in GWMW-2 was acetone, which is presented as a result of laboratory 9,21o6:. a/ Golder Associates July 1992 -56- 913-2403 contamination. The maximum concentration of volatile organic compounds in the downgradient monitoring wells generally exceed EPA or State of Colorado standards. VOCs were not detected in any deep wells. No pesticides or herbicides were detected in any of the water quality samples analyzed. Four trace metals (barium, cadmium, iron and manganese) were detected in one or more of the samples. In general, no tend was observed for occurrence of metals with respect to shallow versus deep wells or upgradient versus downgradient wells. The presence of iron in the deep monitoring wells but not the shallow monitoring wells suggests that water in the deeper saturated zone is chemically under reducing (anaerobic) conditions whereas water in the shallow saturated zone is under oxidizing (aerobic) conditions. Ammonia was detected in six of the seven deep wells but none of the shallow wells. The presence of ammonia in the deep wells is another indication of anaerobic conditions in the deep saturated zone and suggests that a source of ammonia exists upgradient of the landfill. Nitrate was detected in all but one of the water quality samples. The detection of nitrate in upgradient as well as downgradient wells suggests an agricrdtural source. The water quality samples classify as calcium -sulfate to magnesium -sulfate based on the analysis of major anions and cations. Fifteen of the eighteen groundwater samples exceed the EPA and State of Colorado drinking crater standard for Gross Alpha activity. Two ssunples exceed the EPA and State of Colorado drinking water standard for combined Radium 226 and 228. The source of radionuclides and radioactivity appears to be natural and related to geologic materials occurring beneath the site. Golder Associates July 1992 -57- 913-2403 The water quality results discussed above suggest that the landfill has contributed volatile organic compounds to the shallow saturated zone and the landfill underdrain. Cone entraaons exhibited by an off -site (approximately 15 feet from the landfill boundary), downgradient, shallow monitoring well (GWMW 5) suggest that volatile organic compounds have migrated off -site. Based on other analytical data collected as part of this study, the landfill does not appear to be a significant source of metals, pesticides, herbicides, nutrients, major anion and cations, or radionuclides. The deeper groundwater system has apparently not beta adversely impacted by the landfill operations but has evidently been impacted by upgradient activities. Upgradient groundwater sample results for nitrate, sulfate, radionuclides, and radioactivity indicate that the shallow groundwater near the landfill does not meet drinking water standards due to naturally occurring conditions or upgradient impacts. However, two downgradient water wells are permitted by the State of Colorado to withdraw shallow groundwater for domestic or stock use. These two wells represent potential receptor points for volatile organic compound migration via shallow groundwater. The following section presents recommendations for upgrades to site operations and additional investigative activities based on the data presented in this seorL GG Golder Associate 92106_' .?3 V July 1992 -58- 913-2403 9.0 RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the information presented in this report, the following recommendations are made to upgrade the site operations and to further deilne the site hydrogeological and geochemical conditions: ► The design of the unlined portion of the diversion trench located along the northern boundary of the site should be revised to prevent continued recharge to the shallow aquifer system. ► The extent of off -site volatile organic compound migration south of the landfill should be delineated. ▪ The current use of the downgradi.enc water wells south of the landfill should be determined through interviews with well owners. ► Surface water in Spomer Laices should be sampled to determine if discharge from the landfill underdrain is measurably impacting the lakes. ► Shallow monitoring wells along the southern portion of the landfill should be resampled to provide a larger database and to confirm the results of the Golder investigation. ► The potential impacts from upgradient irrigation activities should be defined through quarterly sampling of all monitoring wells. ► Seasonal water level changes should be determined through quarterly monitoring of waver levels in all monitoring wells and soil gas probes. ► The extent of saturated refuse in the northern portion of the landfill should be determined through installation of additional piezometers. G‘7— Golder Associates 9y106t TABLE 6-2 SUMMARY OF VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS DETECTED IN WATER QUALITY SAMPLES 4 §§§are$ 0 o o 0 •4'do V V V V w„y. v o! .. §§§§§§§ 000b000 ✓ V V V V V V o o , V V '- §§§§§§§ §§§§§§§ 0 0 0 0 G do v v v V v V v Sr N`.u✓. i 14� �QQ1�1Q�14� §V Vooddt �`§V• V V V V glo0' V V j 14��QQ 1Q�14� 1Q�14Q §§§4A§§V ✓ V V V V V V `§§§ `e' V V V ry i. 1Q�4Q lQ�{Q�tQ� V§§§§§§ V V V V V V Y SC ti : m. 'c. .. 1QQ1Q� 1Q� 1p1Q�p yppVff 1QQ1�� Q�Qpp i O S§ V O O V O o o o o o d o 0 v V V v v v v v ' 1q1Q�� 1pQ1�aQ1a 1Q1Q�a 1qQ1p� 1q1QQa 1ppV!! VVV V§ 0 0 0000000 v v v v v v V e y ,..: 1p1p�� O g S 000 V V V <0.005 II: OM 1<0 005 ' I . <0 P... ITN " *Si re! S} � et- L{= i pN �(ppp. §§§OOlQ§O v v v v V 0o .,,,, 'h f,/vs{ yp� V v ,Ov§O§§§".O§O pN pN 1p� VVVVVVV yp� yp1 VVV v'0§00§00 V§8§§§§§ . .06;06666 ''-.vV �« yq� yp� Np �(pJ Np 0000ciod v v v v v v v p��GJI YT ti�u, N A,r oogra-si 6cod VVVVG.od Vo' .'ggggggg,n:g8S dot o ✓VVVV vV '. 006 V V v V V vvv ' q::.,,,; S.r, uC a!! i5S ^.0g§§§ 000 00000 V V V ,__V V V V V +s -': "+ §§§§§§§ 00000oo V V VVVVV :§8§"..;8gg§s§§ . Yn, 000 VVV ,'':0000000 ,✓: Y -'VVVVvvv v V v v v v v �1- , [i^<`.J5.,.... t` r w, §§§§42 �b}VQJ Q iti o ✓vvVv0o`vV " 1a�� 1Q� §§§§§§§ Vvvvvvv QQQQ�� o2vv `a aas 1Q� V s. �., r I. ..o O 000000 0P000000 XOOOOOOO' VVvvvvv '%0000000 .:0000000 '.. 0000000,, VVvvvvv .000 •. ':VVV 000 000 ` ':ooa,o,o ,•:00 Ooh 2�A vv. crci 4 •S Q N N N N N N Al N N 2^SS•C'Na N NN N of N t7 aaaaaaa Aa�aalaaas :. GWMW-8..:....3/27192 GWMW-9 3/31192 OWMW-10 3/25/92 GW}.AW-11 3/28/92 OWMW-12 3/31/92 GWMW-13 3/25/92 GWMW=14 3/26/92 -- '�%Aa�J N N N ^a, r�rNN ` N N N N N N N "aTp} �'2' NNx� "A 5542 'ZG �qy Fr . Ti a r• NaI 'l i tbp No k C ,.. 2 m tiii.mmmm• C 3U 3. Q 3 c 2 c 3 9 O 1 m G C m 5 i S 5 %Nmm2�_� cc d qN3 . O 1- N. 3: m C ax.,,42 am CU AS d y v` 0 e I p v A • .ccemc ifi • C Y C G als OMM0.10. 0 a S a M a 1 1 O ::41; Aaa33..a- az0004 $-s c _ 0...MNN3 u E5 c z Z • in I I I e air. es ,„, r'5E1 ifoa'N NNV CJ C 0 Or�:�rH Q.< 0a N VI 0 a Gold.r Associates TABLE.6-3; TRACE METALS DETECTED iN WATER QUALITY SAMPLES : C ' "., �'«a±;, AC2IIG4,. rox ":mss wF,�.tP: r C`.j;�asN/ oncentranomnzia '_ Nom" ... . Samples „, EaLC"., 2�x 'illIIi f.,,,: S'; Qromaunt .4�Ytor Manganese Shallow Wells GWMW-1 GWMW-2 GWMW-3 GWMW-4 GWMW 5 GWMW-5N GWMW-5N (dup.) GWMW-6 GWMW-7 3/27/92 3/27/92 3/25/92 3/26/92 3/31/92 3/30/92 3/30/92 3/25/92 3/31/92 <0.010 CM <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 07025 (.025 D <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0,0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 i D 08T (}-.24 0:24 0:0It� 0:26 Deep Wells GWMW-8 GWMW-9 GWMW 10 GWMW-11 GWMW-12 GWMW-13 GWMW-14 3/27/92 3/31/92 3/25/92 3/26/92 3/31/92 3/25/92 3/26/92 al ' <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 Mg <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 an <0.10 <0.10 1122 f!3? x.88 Ef,L' <0.010 q'_t}7'. ik2Itt CM1 kVA <0.010 <0.10 <0.10 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.010 <0.010 Swface Water LF-UD N -Discharge RP -Inlet 3/26/92 3/27/92 3/26/92 ' etc I6 f <0.00so <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 ri aa5 Oi QA Samples TB FB MB -6D 3/27/9 3/27/92 3/30/92 NA <0.010 <0.010 NA <0.0050 <0.0050 NA <0.010 <0.010 NA <0.10 <0.10 NA <0.010 <0.010 NOTES: Detected concentadotss ate shaded. NA — Not Analyzed TB = Trip Blank FB m Field Blank MB = Method Blank July 1992 913-2403 Golder Associates 92106! • ( TABLE 6-4 NUMIDTS DETECTED IN WATER QUALITY SAMPLES r }@ley ,. z ' ., V � <+TT ��r ��, `. '\ 'l a� f.MQ4A()tt' �.� �4 _vIY Y n �+ j�� ♦ 1: �• "�',-< , AP rY' i3��n_ "F:.BPi'T�,�.hi�'._,.4 i WQcmt atutiiimas n, i�hh' .:- toe % a. W�.(arN ,z {Y�{i�'My. �i NJC x +Tl\14Yt � s 1 N. Shallow Wells GWMW-1 GWMW-2 GWMW-3 GWMW-4 GWMW-5 GWMW-5N GWMW-5N (dup) GWMW-6 GWMW-7 3/27/92 3/27/92 3/25/92 3/26/92 3/31/52 3/30/52 3/30/92 3/25/52 3/31/52 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 713 2 .2 br Deep Wells GWMW-8 GWMW-9 GWMW-10 GWMW-11 GWMW-12 GWMW-13 GWMW-14 3/27/92 3/31/92 3/25/92 3/26/92 3/31/92 3/25/92 3/26/92 <0.10 MI M <0.10 a a • Surface Water LP -DD N -Discharge RP -inlet 3/26/92 3/27/92 3/26/92 <0.10 <0.106 <0.10 QA Samples TB FB 3/27/92 3/27/92 NA <0.10 NA <0.10 NOTE: Detected concentrations are shaded. NA 9 Not Analyzed TB = Trip Blank FB a Field Blank July 1992 Laboratory blank simples was not analyzed for nutrients. 913-2403 Golder Associates 92106* z� TABLE 6-5 RADIONUCLIDES AND RADIOACTIVITY DETECTED IN WATER QUALITY SAMPLES '. ` .� _'x > ;'y^t h +f3� �" rh4" Y zt— 'fflR' ':� +VH y[ q PX;ortaort h '-.<$�/! this ..-'-.--''vY ,{/!.�u `'PP^'Q,,\J4VWry '�_14y.�Cn, 9 rIL i �-J_�f'� .: . war`_ Shallow Wells GWMW-1 3/27/92 67 50 2.0 1.9 GWMW-2 3/27/92 56 38 0.9 1.7 GWMW-3 3/25/92 180 47 7.0 6.2 GWMW-4 3/26/92 60 0.0 1.5 0.0 GWMW-5 3/31/92 19 36 0.0 1.4 GWMW-5N 3/30/92 . 90 55 1.4 0.9 GWMW-5N (dup.) 3/30/92 62 38 0.4 0.4 GWMW-6 3/25/92 64 57 1.2 0.9 GWMW-7 3/31/92 82 76 0.0 1.3 Deep Wells GWMW-8 3/27/92 38 71 .0.4 1.0 GWMW-9 3/31/92 41 25 2.1 2.7 GWMW-10 3/25/92 49 28 2.9 3.4 GWMW-11 3/26/92 10 22 2.5 2.4 GWMW-12 3/31/92 5 1.4 1.0 0.0 GWMW-13 3/25/92 16 33 0.9 2.1 GWMW-14 3/26/92 11 17 1.1 0.2 Surface Water IF-IlD 3/26/92 40 18 0.1 C.9 N -Discharge 3/27/92 15 14 0.0 0.3 RP -Inlet 3/26/92 32 16 0.3 0.7 QA. Samples TB 3/27/92 NA NA NA I NA F333/27/92 0.8 1.6 0.0 1 0.0 NOTE: NA = Not Analyzed TB = Trip Blank FB = Field Blank Laboratory blank samples were not analyzed for radioactivity. July 1992 913-2403 f oldMAssocia es 921O6t" see? i \ APPROXIMATE SITE LOCATION 1\\\` \'�111'd'i1�z.:\' Golder Associates Denier, Colorado cuonyettaitcr WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL ORA r�twaF • GENERAL SITE LOCATION MAP KAW WEH r ALE NO. 1992 r -200a JOB ! Z1SEUU, JC ».c 440./W/. «o. "O. 923-2403 Af nO, 1-2 9210 kg IA I i I . I F� IN/ 1 l •/ ,y f` - fe r !3R • %, L. ,. % • • a tO • r - / 4t 3 Pirt g I. 8 n 0 P 6-6- N 3 0 ; f0 13 le 1 g dgt 0 • - 1 �4 'y ••3\ ,� Li 4 �; i ti s �`� `% II it _... / ' . 93166 a J V A 1 6- TABLE PERMITTED WELLS DOWNGRADIENT CENTRAL WELD SANITARY 2-4 OF THE LANDFILL PERMITr ., EGISTEREEIF= `,» .,.:... - �IIYELLDEPTH� tkk‘ (ft 4 *£ �WATEA:LL:..:�tEVEC..,,, (tt}n.Y NA 8 9 iISE D S O #765 #11090 #90580 • Robert Race Parker, Colorado GA & MJ Shable Milliken, Colorado H Daniels Denver, Colorado 263 37 22 Notes: NA . Data not available Usage Codes D a Domestic S Pe Stock Source: Colorado State Engineer, Division of Water Resources August 1992 913-2403 6o - Golder Associates 9310619.33 • 4 TABLE 6-2 REPORTING LIMITS FOR VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS GompoWier ';:a t F 2 iYL✓ r$ ,( 'rr' § /.?e, ;. Y , .' omentsr�`MonitoFfp br,dtio- . �F � RCpOtting LoontL ;� 1, 2-Dichloroethane 3 ug/1 1,1-Dichloroethene 5 ug/1 1,2-Dichloropropane 5 ug/1 Methylene Chloride 5 ug/1 Tetrachloroethene 5 ug/l Trans -1, 2-Dichloroethene (total) 3 ug/1 Trichloroethene 5 ug/1 Total Organic Carbon .1.0 mg/1 NOTE: Reporting limits provided by contracted laboratory, Environmental Monitoring Laboratory, Inc. Total Organic Carbon is not strictly a volatile organic parameter. August 1992 913-2403 Golder Associates 9fl06t 31 TABLE 6-1 REPORTING LIMITS FOR INORGANIC GROUNDWATER PARAMETERS' f %,w ,' ' vv:rkt,, ;:s..--,4 kz v .... i ,�x ; `iglltlltA2QI"MGUiYO! �� ,4ora Re Limits, . � pow&. <4. � Alkalinity 10 mg/1 Ammonia 0.02 mg/1 Cadmium 5 ug/1 Calcium 5 mg/1 Chemical Oxygen Demand 10 mg/1 Chloride 0.5 mg/1 Iron 100 ug/1 Lead 5 ug/1 Magnesium 0.2 ug/1 Manganese 15 ug/1 Mercury 0.2 ug/1 Nitrate/Nitrite 0.05 mg/1 Potassium 5 mg/1 Sodium 5 mg/I Sulfate 5 mg/1 Zinc 20 ug/1 NOTE: 1) Reporting limits provided by contacted laboratory, Environmental Monitoring Laboratory, Inc. August 1992 913-2403 61, Golder Associates 33106' DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 1111De COLORADO • August 17, 1992 :-..et Waste Services Corporation tam ...• Y 60 77th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80634 Mr. Hedberg: 1517.16 AVENUE COURT GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 ADMINISTRATION (303) 35.-0586 HEALTH PROTECTION (303) 'PM -NM COMMUNITY NEALTN (303) 353-0639 Our Division has received the "Hydrogeologic and Gectecbnical Characterization for the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, Weld County. Colorado", dated July 1992. We are very concerned with the results of your water quality analysis, particularly with regard to the presence of V0C's in five of the monitoring wells. We are in the process of reviewing your recommendations. We will be in contact with you upon completion of this review. Sincerely, S. Pickle. M.S.E.H. tractor, Environmental Health Division xc: Austin Buckingham, Colorado Department of Health Chuck Cunliffe, Weld County Planning Department Lee Morrison, Assistant County Attorney Brad Keirnes, Waste Services G� 33106? - 36 •4 •. "ffIc Wine COLORADO October S, 1992 Mr. Bill Hedberg Waste Services Corporation Central Weld Sanitary Landfill 6037 77th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80634 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 1317.16 AVENUE COURT GREELEY. COLORADO 80631 ADMINISTRATION (303) 353-0366 NEALTN PROTECTION 130 "1-" COMMUNITY WEALTH (3031353-0639 Mr. Hedberg: This Division has reviewed your Hydrogeologic and Geotechnical Characterization for the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, dated July, 1992. Trevor Jiricek and myself will be meeting with you on October 6, to discuss our concerns with regard to the report. At this time, we do wish to advise you that in the opinion of this Divi:ion, the findings in your report. specifically, the presence of volatile organic compounds in the offsite monitoring well, constitute a violation of section 2.1.4. of the State Solid Waste Regulations. You have been most cooperative up to the present in taking appropriate action toward mitigation and remediation of these problems. Consequently, we will suspend further legal action. pending our meeting on October 6, the results of further studies. and so long as you continue to cooperate as you have in the past. Very yyou GL ohn S. Pickle Director. Environmental Protection Services Division xc: Lee Morrison, Assistant County Attorney Randy Gordon, M.D., M.P.H., Director GG- 9x19€:' .37 Et „,1 weld $6.w 144 ►J • /v1 eV' : ilehlzsztment of North An€rica. ins Mount.+in rogicn 5^C'0 C"" vvc'. Plaza Blvd. • Cnn'nwcc•d.:, -,::••;;;10 5 a�C:.:.n3/7?0.3324 October 5, 1992 Ms. Austin Buckingham Colorado Department of Health Hazardous Materials and Waste Management Division HMWMD-SWIM-S2 4300 Cherry creek Drive South Denver CO 80222-1530 RE: CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL CONFIRMATION GROUNDWATER SAMPLING 'AR Dear Ms. Buckingham: Enclosed for your review is the final report and summary letter from SEC/Donohue dated September 10, 1992, for the confirmation sampling event performed at Central Weld Sanitary Landfill (CWSL). This sampling event included the Spomer pond that receives discharge from the landfill underdrain. This pond was not previously included in the sampling event performed as part of the CWSL Hydrogeologic investigation. Please contact Bill Hedberg at 1-330-2641 or Alan Scheere at 770- 3324 if you have any questions about the report. Sincerely, ad, Sati Bill Hedberg Division V.P. Landfill Operations Environmental Specialist Alan Scheere AS\mmp Enclosure cc: John Pickle, Weld County Health Department w/enc Sara Broadbent, Western Region 9/51 W\buckIKhun.926 P CWSL9,1 • • A SEC DONOHUE September 10, 1992 Lori Tagawa Waste Management of Colorado, Inc. 5660 Greenwood Plaza Blvd. Suite 400 Englewood, CO 80111 RE: CENTRAL WELD COUNTY SANITARY LANDFILL CONFORMATION GROUNDWATER SAMPLING Dear Lori, Enclosed for your review is the final report for the July, 1992 conformation sampling event performed at the Central Weld County Sanitary Landfill as part of the hydro-geo investigation. Sampling was conducted on July 15, 16, 17, 20 and 21, 1992 and the analysis was performed by the Waste Management, Inc. Environmental Monitoring Laboratory (EML). The results presented in the EML report confirm the original results reported by Enseco-Rocky Mountain Analytical in support of the hydro-geo investigation. Virtually all volatile compounds detected during the original sampling and Enseco analysis were confirmed and reported by the EML analysis. Compounds that were not confirmed by EML include acetone in GWMW02 which was detected just over the reporting by Enseco. EML reported no volatile compounds in GWMW02 indicating that the original value is most likely a laboratory or field contaminant. EML did not report methylene chloride in GWMW07, again indicating that the Enseco value may be from a laboratory source. The Enseco data reports the compound 1,2-dichloroethene as 'total' and reported a detection of this compound in wells GWMW0S and GWMW5N. EML reports only the 'trans" isomer and this was not detected in GWMW05 or GWMW5N indicating that the 'total' values in the Enseco report are likely attributable to the "cis' isomer. In addition to confirming the compounds detected in the original analysis, the EML data, which -generally had lower reporting limits for the volatile compounds reported additional compounds at a level that was below the Enseco reporting limit. These compounds include: 1,1 dichlorethane, tetrachloroethene and trichloroethene in GWMW04, 1,2-dichloropropane and 1,1 dichloroethane in GWM W05, 1,1-dichloroethane, (trans) l,2-dichloroethene, trichloroethene, and vinyl chloride in GWMW07, carbon sulfide in GWMWIO and trichloromethane in the Under Drain. 93106?. • • Ms. Tagawa September 10, 1992 Page 2 Enseco did not analyze for the compound dichlorofluoromethane and flwU. reported this in wells GWMW04, GWMWO5, GWMWSN and GWMW07 and the Under Drain. Enseco also did not analyze for the compound ttichlorofluoro iiethaniand BC'reported this in well GWMWO7 and / the Under Drain. A table comparing volatile compounds detected during the Enseco and EML analyses is included. During the EML analysis the compounds bromodichloromethane and chloroform were detected in field blank 01 and chloroform was detected in field blank 02. This was most likely present in the deionized water that was used as opposed to appearing from a field source. These compounds were not detected in any of the wells and the deionized water appears to have had no adverse affects on the data. Trihalomethanes (THMs) can be found in drinking water supplies as a byproduct of the treatment process. There appeared to be no significate changes in the metals or other inorganic results between the Enseco-RMAL and EML reports. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions , regarding this event. Sincerely, Environmental Scientist RT/rt cc: Bruce Clabaiigh, WMC w/enc. S2106? GG DETECTED VOLATILE COMPOUNDS (original'RMA and confirming EML analyses) sysji GWMW02 GWMW04 GWMW0S GWMWSN GWMWO7 GWMW10 LFUD Compound Acetone 1,2-Dichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroehjane Dichlorofluoromethane Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene 1,2-Dichloroethene 1,1-Dichloroethane 1,2-Dichloropropane Dichlorofluoromethane Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene 1,2-Dichloroethene 1,1-Dichloroethane 1,2-Dichloropropane Dichlorofluoromethane Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene 1,2-Dichioroethene 1,1-Dichloroethane 1,2-Dichloroethane Dichlorofluoromethane Trichlorofluoromethane Vinyl Chloride Methylene chloride Carbon disulfide Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene ;1,1-Dichloroethane Dichlorofluoromethane Trichlorofluoromethane Z Bevel -Elm ND @25 ug/L 5 487 a:T 72301 '_86' ND (trans) @6 261 791 :580 ac 90 ND (trans) @12 ;,,17.1 116- 110 18.1 =5J 79 _(trans) -16' 16 18. -S 2_ ND @3 3 ST, .3 .7 .� 9 (NA a Not analyzed, ND a Not detected) LeYSEE.M6. 34 ug/L 18 ND GS NA ND @5 ND@5 210 70 26 (total) ND @10 ND @10 NA 140 50 17 (total) 5.4 5.8 NA 9.5 ND @5 ND (total) @5 ND @5 6.1 NA NA ND @10 10 ND @5 5 ND @5 5.4 NA NA 921064 J 1 I i rz -_ • W'• • \ T R,. '9 i.. Mme/ 1 = .. 1 1 - 1 l ? S ,f , 1. y 1 „rL.y 4 i • /t: W• cC I I i ' / I e 9=1Q6' -t yZ W J • i Z- Aa r`. 4! — r n ,--7? �` ,,_Qt iit rr. • %j V 7 ta i� I 9106' 9 W� J ft gis f g Is s °_ oM IR og ig Ha t • 3! E 0 I • t ; s - L N w,w� :. _ � 1, { 1 --.., C' �\ t A P w w 0 f e R • \\ ' i�Y'✓ :• \\ 11`x\ ^` V _1,:,1 1iT\ _ - ,a, EE /� \ a. ii, _.-. �._- ; is \ • 4.. 3'� _ �� =',�" 92105" • Golder Associates Inc. 200 Union Boulevard. Suite 100 Lokewood. CO USA 80228 Telephone (303) 980.0540 Fax (303)085-2080 October 23, 1992 Waste Services Corporation 6037 77tn Avenue Greeley, CO 80634 Attention: Mr. Bill Hedberg • 'GoldeAssocir es Our Ref.: 913-2403 RECEIVED SANITATION O;VJS:ON OCT 2 6 1992 V!CLD C9:riIY l L LTI RE: EXPANDED HYDROGEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION AT Alit CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL, COLORADO Dear Bill: Golder Associates Inc. (Golder) is pleased to present the results of the above -referenced project to Waste Services Corporation (WSC). Golder has completed the installation of temporary sampling points (TSPs) and collected groundwater samples for chemical analysis. The following sections provide background information, summarize field activities, and present results of the analysis. 1.0 BACKGROUND Golder recently completed a hydrogeological and geotechnical investigation for the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill (CWSL) (see "Hydrogeologic and Geotechnical Characterization for the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill", Golder, 1992). Seven geotechnical borings, three shallow groundwater monitoring wells, seven deep groundwater monitoring wells, and twenty soil gas probes were installed during the field investigation portion of the investigation. The geotechnical borings, monitoring wells, and soil gas probes supplemented five shallow groundwater monitoring wells previously installed at the site. Water quality data were generated from samples collected from groundwater monitoring wells and surface water sampling points. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were detected in four shallow groundwater monitoring wells (GWMW-4, GWMW-5, GWMW-5N and GWMW-7) on the southern (downgradient) side of the landfill and at one surface water sampling point, the outlet of the landfill underdrain (LE-UD). Figure 1 shows the locations of sampling points where VOCs were detected and Table 1 s33. 016, _ OFFICES IN AUSTPAUA. CANADA. GERMANY. HUNGARY, ITALY. SWEDEN. UNITED KINGDOM. UNITED STATES yC • • October 23, 1992 -2- 913-2403 summarizes the results. It should be noted that VOCs were detected in GWMW-5, located off -site approximately 20 feet south of the site boundary. WSC determined that additional investigative efforts were required to further characterize the quality of shallow groundwater downgradient of the landfill. 2.0 FIELD ACTIVITIES Field activities conducted at the CWSL as part of the expanded hydrogeologic investigation included drilling, installation of TSPs and collection of groundwater samples from the TSPs. The field program was initiated on September 21, 1992. The following sections provide a brief description of drilling operations, TSP construction, and groundwater sampling procedures. 2.1 Drilling Operations Drilling operations were conducted by GEO Environmental (GEO) of Golden, Colorado. GEO utilized a pickup -truck mounted Giddings drill rig for all boreholes except TSP-5. Due to difficult access to the TSP-5 location, this borehole was drilled with a small all terrain vehicle mounted hydraulic hammer rig, utilizing a 1 -inch diameter drill rod. Other boreholes were drilled with 2 -inch diameter solid stem flight augers. Golder field personnel supervised all drilling activities. Boreholes were drilled approximately five feet below the anticipated water table depth, based on previous site -characterization data. Auger refusal was encountered in TSP-7 and TSP-8 at depths approximately 10 feet below the anticipated water table depth. No water was encountered at these locations. A summary of final borehole depths, including water levels encountered, is provided in Table 2. All drilling and sampling equipment, including drill rods, samplers, and tools, was steam - cleaned prior to initiation of drilling activities and between boreholes. These cleaning procedures ensured that representative samples were obtained from each TSP. Nine TSPs were installed as part of this investigation (Figure 1) The TSPs were installed near the southern property line to further characterize shallow groundwater on the downgradient side of the landfill. TSP locations are summarized as follows: Temporary Sampling Sampling Point. On- or OfGSte ...Approximate Latino - Sitisg Aationele TSP-I Off 200' south of GottistW4 Define extent of VOC migration detected in GWMW.S TSP-2 On 400' wen of CWMW-5N Queening* groundwater in caner of mutts property boundary �lr Golder Associates 9:1;106f. U I I I I I I October 23, 1992 -3- 913-2403 a Temporary SampGo4 .� Point. On -or Off -Ste- ' AopmCabLoration - - Slog- Rattoaale TSP-3 On 340' west of TSP-2 Characterize groundwaer in center of south property boundary TSP-4 On 340' wan o(TSP-3 Characterize groundwater in center of south property boundary TSP-5 Off Center of Middle Sportier Lake Darn Characterize groundwater downgnd:ent of landfill underdnin TSP-6 On 300' southwest o(GWMW6 Characterize groundwaterupgradieet of landfill underlain TSP-7 Off 225' south of property line, midway between TSP-2 and TSP-3 Characterize groundwater downgndient of the caner of the landfill TSP'S Off 300' south of property line. midway between TSP-2 and TSP-4 Characterize groundwater downgradeeent of the center of the landfill TSP-MW-5 Off -- 3' south of GWMW-S Compare TSP sampling mruW with monitoring well sampling results Approximate TSP locations are provided in Figure 2. Due to the extensive amount of data collected during Golder's 1992 hydrogeologic and geotechnical investigation, it was not necrs try to collect soil samples. Accordingly, borehole logs were not prepared for the TSPs. 2.2 Sacpl&PointInstallation Procedures The TSPs were installed by GEO in all boreholes drilled as part of this investigation. The GEO Expendable Aquifer Sampling Implant (EASI) was utilized for the TSPs. After the boreholes had been drilled to the desired depth, the EASI points were installed in completed boreholes. The end of the drill rod was fitted with an expendable tip and placed in the boreholes. One end of a 3/8 -inch Teflon" tube was perforated with 1/16 -inch holes over a 1 -foot interval. The tube was then inserted into the drill rod and attached to the expendable tip. The drill rod was then removed from the borehole, exposing the perforated interval to the formation to allow groundwater to migrate into the tube. The TSPs were completed by pouring 10-20 grit environmental grade silica sand into the borehole while agitating the 3/8 -inch tube to prevent bridging. The sand was placed to a level approximately one foot below ground surface; granular bentonite was then placed from that point to ground surface and hydrated with deionized water. Final completion details differed between on -site and off -site TSPs. On -site TSPs were sealed with Parafilmt°s); Golder Associates 921o6 1/7 S October 23, 1992 -a- 913-2403 completed with 1 -inch diameter, 5 -inch long PVC tubes; and, threaded caps were placed to protect the sampling point. Cement pads were constructed around the TSPs to prevent surface water infiltration. Locations were marked with survey stakes. Off -site TSPs were sealed with Pa teller° and attached to survey stakes. Figure 2 illustrates a typical "EAST" temporary sampling point. All TSP locations were surveyed by Stewart and Associates of Fort Collins, Colorado, on September 25, 1992. Ground surface and bottom of borehole elevations are provided in Table 2. 2.3 Sampling Procedures EASI TSPs are designed to be sampled without development. Groundwater samples were collected from EAST TSPs upon completion; or, in the case of low -yielding points, when sufficient groundwater was present for sample collection. As discussed in Section 2.1, Drilling Operations, auger refusal was encountered at TSP-7 and TSP-8 prior to encountering the water table; no samples were collected from these points. Groundwater samples were collected from the TSPs utilizing a peristaltic pump attached to the 3/8 -inch diameter tube, or alternatively, to a 3/16 -inch diameter tube threaded down the larger tube. The alternative methodology was utilized when water levels were deeper than 20 feet or the water contained a large percentage of silt. In those instances, the peristaltic pump was not capable of creating sufficient vacuum to extract a sample. The 3 -16 -inch tube, unperforated, could be inserted into the larger tube directly to the water level, allowing the pump to extract a sample. Groundwater samples were collected in 20 -milliliter (ml) volatile organic analysis (VOA) vials. The vials were immediately labelled and placed on ice in coolers for preservation. Strict chain -of -custody procedures were followed, and the samples were delivered to Phoenix Analytical Laboratories (Phoenix) for chemical analysis. Copies of chain -of -custody forms are included in the attachments. The samples were analyzed using EPA Method 8240 for the following parameters: ► Vinyl Chloride; ► 1,1-Dichloroethee; ► 1, 1- Dichloroethane; ► trans-1,2-Dichloroethee; ► cis-1,2-Dichloroethee; ► 1,2-Dichloroethane; ► 1,2-Dichloropropane; Golder Associates 9'106t /44.6 PI October 23, 1992 -5- 913-2403 ► Trichlorocthene; and, ► Tetrachloroethane. The analytes include the six VOCs detected in the downgradient monitoring wells during the initial investigation, with the addition of vinyl chloride, a degradation product of the tichloroethene and tetrachloroethane series (see Table 1). It should be noted that trans-1,2- Dichloroethene and cis-I,2-Dichloroethene results provided by Phoenix have been presented in Table 3 in a combined format as 1,2-Dichloroethene. This presentation format is consistent with the manner in which the initial investigative results were presented (see Golder, 1992). 3.0 RESULTS Results of chemical analysis of the groundwater samples are presented in Table 3. Copies of the Phoenix reports are included in the attachments. No target compounds were detected in the TSPs, with the exception of the confirmatory TSP-MW-S. Results indicate that VOC impacts to shallow groundwater on the south side of the landfill are limited to the immediate area of the landfill. A comparison of TSP-MW-5 results with GWMW-5 results is provided in Table 4. It should be noted that GWMW-5 results presented in Table 4 are from the sampling round conducted as a part of the initial hydrogeologic study. The comparison shows that the same compounds were detected in both sample points, although at slightly different concentrations. The slight differences in concentrations between the two sampling rounds could be the result of using different analytical laboratories. Additionally, the TSP drilling and sampling methodology may enhance volatilization of targeted compounds. The comparison indicates that the TSPs are a useful, means of obtaining qualitative groundwater quality information for the site. 4.0 CONCLUSIONS Results of the expanded hydrogeologic study, combined with results of the initial investigation, suggest that the occurrence of VOCs in the shallow groundwater is isolated to particular areas. Elevated concentrations of VOCs were detected during the initial investigation in the southeast and southwest corners of the landfill. VOCs were not detected in the center of the south side of the landfill VOCs were also not detected in off -site sampling points, with the exception of the GWMW-5 and TSP-MW-S locations. The isolated occurrences of VOCs may be the result of different types of waste disposed in these areas. Golder Associates 9196' �9' October 23, 1992 -6- 913-2403 The 1992 initial hydrogeologic investigation concluded that the nearest permitted downgradient groundwater well is approximately 2,000 feet from the landfill. Detection of offsite VOC migration in the shallow groundwater was limited to very low levels in TSP-MW-S which was located approximately 23 feet south of the site boundary and immediately downgradient of GWMW-5. TSP-1, which was located about 200 feet further south, showed no VOC contamination. Accordingly, no water well users are being impacted by volatile organic compounds originating from the landfill. Any questions concerning the content of this report should be dinxted to the undersigned. Sincerely, GOLDER ASSOCIATES INC. /nn' f-�r Christopher E. Rife Engineer Technician fr--,1„1/,ae-Gat Ward E. Herst, PG, CEM Senior Hydrogeologist CER/WEH/smp TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS DETECTED AT DOWNGRADIENT SAMPLING POINTS SAME 1NCs t`'v: -----':- ' COMPOUNEXCONCENTRATIONS Z-0CEtekt2OCPC rreg,_ ;Ba +%C 7-Vootr,FGE- 7t L3. ik`�P0IN' v -1/4S.'CAJ,, ` T.2-DCA»,' . GWMW-4 <0.005 0.018 <0.005 <0.005 = <0.005 ¢0.005 GWMW-5 <0.01 <0.01 0.025 <0.01 0.070 0.210 GWMW-5N 0.0054 <0.005 0.017 0.0058 0.050 0.140 GWMW-7 <0.005 0.0061 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 0.0095 LF-UD 0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 0.005 NOTES: (1) Below Detection Limit - 80L (2) 1,1 - DCA a 1 .1 -Dichloroethane 1,2 - DCA . 1,2-Oithloroethane 1,2 - DCE to 1,2-Oichloroethene 1,2 - DCP . 1,2-Dichloropropane TCE • Trichloroethene PCS a Tetrachloroethane October 1992 913-2403 Golder Associates 921°6q COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 1517. 10 AVENUE COURT GREELEY, COLORADO 8063+ ADMINISTRATION (303) 3534566 HEALTH PROTECTION (303) 1614631 1631 COMMUNITY HEALTH (303) 3534639 February 22, 1993 William J. Hedberg Waste Services Corporation 6037 77th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80634 Dear Mr. Hedberg: The Environmental Protection Division of the Weld County Health Department has received the "Preliminary Design, Operations, and Closure Plan", Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, Weld County, Colorado. Initial review has revealed the document to be incomplete as submitted. Page 4- 1, Section 4.0, refers to a series of sheets (Nos. 1 through 20) which have not been provided as part of the document. The Division has ceased review of this document pending receipt of all necessary doucments. In addition, the Division requests that the term "preliminary" be defined as it occurs in the document title. If you have any question, you may contact me at (303) 353-063S. Sincerely, ohm S. Pickle, M.S.E.H. Director, Environmental Protection Services TJ-359 cc: Alan Scheere, Waste Management of North America, Inc. Roger Doak, Colorado Department of Health Lee Morrison, Assistant Weld County Attorney Chuck Cunliffe, Weld County Planning Department 30.20-112 Government - County 30-20-102. Unlawful to operate site and facility without certificate of dedg. nation. (I) Except as provided in subsection (2) of this section, it is unlawful for any person to operate a solid wastes disposal site and facility in the un4. corporated portion of any county without first having obtained therefor a certificate of designation from the board of county commissioners of the' county in which such site and facility is located. (2) Any site and facility for the disposal of mill tailings. metallurgical slq, mining wastes, junk automobiles or parts thereof, or suspended solids es lected, treated, or disposed of within a sanitary sewer system in opera; immediately prior to July 1. 1971, shall have until July 1, 1972, to comply with the provisions of this part I and the rules and regulations adopted the department. (3) The final use for beneficial purposes, including fertilizer, conditioner, fuel, and livestock feed, of sludge which has been processed and certified or designated as meeting all applicable regulations of the department and the department of agriculture shall not require a certificate of designation for such final use. Source: L. 67, p. 759. § 2; C.R.S, 1963, § 36-23-2; L. 71, p. 341, f 3; L. 76. p. 694. § I. 30-20-103. Application for certificate. Any person desiring to operate a solid wastes disposal site and facility within the unincorporated portion any county shall make application to the board of county commissioners the county in which such site and facility is or is proposed to be for a certificate of designation. Such application shall be accompanied a fee of twenty-five dollars which shall not be refundable, and it shall forth the location of the site and facility: the type of site and facility;; type of processing to be used, such as sanitary landfill. composting, s incineration; the hours of operation; the method of supervision; the rates to be charged, if any; and such other information as may be required by board of county commissioners. The application shall also contain such netting, geological, hydrological, and operational data as may be by the department by regulation. The application shall be referred to the department for review and for recommendation as to approval or disa which shall be based upon criteria established by the state board of the water quality control commission, and the air pollution control cc sion. Source: L. 67, p. 759, §-3; C.R.S. 1963. § 36-23.3; L. 71. p. 341. 5,4- 30-20-104. Factors to be considered. (I) In considering an application a certificate of designation, the board of county commissioners shall into account: (a) The effect that the solid wastes disposal site and facility w01 on the surrounding property, taking into consideration the types of to be used. surrounding property uses and values, and wind and__ conditions; (b) The convenience and accessibility of the solid wastes disposal facility to potential users: 9210% 30-20-102 Government - County 30-20-102. Unlawful to operate site and facility without certificate of desig, nation. (I) Except as provided in subsection (2) of this section. it is unlawful "' for any person to operate a solid wastes disposal site and facility in the • c.era' corporated portion of any county without first having obtained therefor •, a, certificate of designation from the board of county commissioners `f ,.., [4ll county in which such site and facility is located. , -'> r t-1 (2) Any site and facility for the disposal of mill tailings, metallurgical shg. S'.p o mining wastes, junk automobiles or parts thereof, or suspended solids .. • come lected, treated, or disposed of within a sanitary sewer system in ope : , 1"r"` immediately prior to July 1, 1971, shall have until July I, 1972. to co •„ i3) with the, provisions of this part I and the rules and regulations adopted , count P. it the department. �- .,, (3) The final use for beneficial purposes, including fertilizer, sod - conditioner, fuel. and livestock feed, of sludge which has been processed t?at and certified or designated as meeting all applicable regulations of the sc department and the department of agriculture shall not require a certificate v.r•., of designation for such final use. to is. Source: L. 67, p. 759, § 2: C.R.S, 1953. § 36-23-2: L. 71, p. 341. S 3;: _ _.c..i L. 76. p. 694. § L _ uthr. prVp• 30.20-103. Application for certificate. Any person desiring to operate ,y, ,- solid wastes disposal site and facility within the unincorporated portion of any county shall make application to the board of county commissioners of the county in which such site and facility is or is proposed to be located t for a certificate of designation. Such application shall be accompanied by • M1 a fee of twenty-five dollars which shall not be refundable, and it shall ,et forth the location of the site and facility: the type of site and facility; the type of processing to be used, such as sanitary landfill, composting. or incineration; the hours of operation; the method of supervision: the rates to be charged, if any; and such other information as may be required by the „e board of county commissioners, The application shall also contain such mid - Ai :. ncering, geological, hydrological, and operational data as may be required a by the department by regulation, The application shall be referred to the . department for review and for recommendation as to approval or disapproval. which shall be based upon criteria established by the state board of ha the water quality control commission, and the air pollution control commit Ir sion. Source: L. 67. p. 759, §.3: C.R.S. 1963. § 36-23-3; L. 71, p. 341, § 4. 30-20-104. Factors to be considered. (I) In considering an application for a certificate of designation. the board of county commissioners shall tabr into account: will haK (a) The effect that the solid wastes disposal site and facility on the surrounding property. taking into consideration the types of process to be used, surrounding property uses and values, and wind and conditions: (b) The convenience and accessibility of the solid wastes disposal site facility to potential users; 921 .55 .44 • 1' a-, o4 crs dtr' S �I Z 0 Ct.66.vi l Ni ela Sa l a.,JF l"J Waste Management of North America, Inc. Mountain Region 5660 Greenwood Plaza Blvd. • Englewood, Colorado 80111 Suite 424.303/770-3324 ' November 16, 1992 Mr. Trevor Jiricek Weld County Department of Health 1517-16 Avenue Court Greeley CO 80631 RE; CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL DISCHARGE PERMIT APPLICATION. Dear Mr: Jiricek; • V \� 19gti tI" . Per your request, this letter will confirm our phone conversation on November 13, 1992, concerning the discharge permit application for the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill (CWSL). As discussed CWSL intends to submit the application to the appropriate agency no later than November 30, 1992. Please call me at 770-3324 or Bill Hedberg at 332-2641 if you have any questions. Sincerely, 010, .clee,te Alan Scheere Environmental Specialist AS/mmp wpilloyvicetl 1.16 P: CWSL 9210€'. ri✓or I re' e_ 1 . r a Sea td • Se M STATE OF COLORADO COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Dedicated to protecting and im the health and environment of the people of 4300 away Creek Or. S. Laboratory Budding Denver. Colorado 80222-1530 4210E 11th Avenue Phan O03) 692-2000 Denver. Colorado 80220.3716 O03) 691-4700 November 17, 1992 Alan Scheere, Environmental Specialist Waste Management of North America, Inc. Rocky Mnt. Satellite Office, Western Region 5660 Greenwood Plaza Blvd., Suite 400 Englewood, Colorado 80111 brNonr Connor Paid A. Nolan, M0. MPH 0vaca. (jimmy CERTIFIED MAIL P 440 450 128 RE: Central Weld Sanitary Landfill (CWSL), Surface Discharge. Dear Alan: The Weld County Health Personnel brought to my attention that there is a surface discharge from the Central Weld Landfill into a Spomer Lake. This lake eventually discharges into the Big Thompson River. During my site inspection on November 6, 1992 I verified that un •ender drain perforated pipe, that runs under the landfill, discharges into Spomer Lake. Also, there is a surface drain ditch and under drain french pipe beneath the drainage ditch that eventually discharge into the Big Thompson River. These discharges constitute point sources and both needed to be permitted. However, it is my understanding that your company is in the process of finalizing an engineering study and that an application for a discharge permit (which will include both sources) will be submitted in the next 10 days. If you anticipate any change from your schedule, please contact Patricia Nelson at (303) 692-3608 or me at (303) 692-3564 If you have any other questions, please call me. Sincerely, FOR DIRECTOR, WATER QUALITY CONTROL DIVISION to3'FY. Saint P.E. District Eng' eer Field Support Section cc: Weld County Health Department Permits and Enforcement Environmental Protection Agency, Region VIII G�r 9.3106t. C. SECTION 2 MINIMUM STANDARDS r• Minimum standards All facilities for solid waste disposal shall comply with the following minimum standards of the act: 2.1.1 Such sites and facilities shall be located, operated, and maintained in a manner so as co control obnoxious odors and prevent rodent and insect breeding and infestation, and they shall be kept adequately covered during their use. 2.1.2 Such sites and facilities shall comply with the health laws, standards, rules, and regulations of the department, the tracer Quality Control Commission, the sir Quality Control Commission, and all applicable zoning laws and ordinances. 2.1,3 No radioactive materials or materials contaminated Sy radioactive substances shall be disposed of in sites or facilities not specifically designated for that purpose. 2.1.4 A site and facility operated as a sanitary landfill shall provide means of finally disposing of solid wastes on land in a manner Co minimize nuisance conditions such as odors, windblown debris, insects, rodents, and smoke; shall provide compacted fill material; shall provide adequate cover with suitable material and surface drainage designated to prevent ponding of water and wind erosion and prevent water and air pollution; and, upon being filled, shall be left in a condition ofcorderliness and good esthetic appearance and capable of blending with the surrounding area. In the operation of such a site and facility, the solid wastes shall be distributed in the smallest area consistent with handling traffic to be unloaded; shall be placed in the most dense volume practicable using moisture and compaction or other method approved by the department; shall he fire, insect, and rodent resistant through the application of an adequate layer or inert material at regular intervals; and shall have a minimum of windblown debris which shall be collected regularly and placed into the fill. 2.1.5 Sites and facilities shall be adequately fenced so as Co prevent waste material and debris from escaping therefrom, and material and debris shall not be allowed to accumulate along the fence line. 2.1.6 Solid wastes deposited at any site/or facility shall not be burned, ocher than by incineration in accordance with a certificate of designation issued pursuant to section 30-20-105; except chat, in extreme emergencies resulting in the generation of large quantities of combustible materials, authorization for burning under controlled conditions may be given by the department. 2.1.7 Any provision of the -Air Pollution Control Act'.Title 25. Article 7, section 108. CRS 1973 as amended, co the contrary notwithstanding. the board of county commissioners in any county with less than twenty-five thousand (25,000) population, according co the latest federal census, is authorized to develop regulations, by resolution, permitting the noncommercial burning Revised 8/90 ),(10) • • 92106 304 der, or determination by ed to classification of agement plans, water egulations, enforcement shall be subject to judi- s article and article 4 of terminations of the com- er issued in accordance al order or determination trict court for the district rule, order, or determi- within thirty days after Rulemaking determina- te Administrative Proce- me final upon issuance eedings. The period for hile any application for ng pursuant to section lication is pending shall review an equal length ers issued pursuant to desist order, clean-up lion or commission, or , may petition the dis- order or determination. ich the pollution source order or determination order or determination re is probable cause to s harm to the affected the order or determin- e, any harmful effects essation of the violation 'thout sufficient corre- e case to the division e purpose of adducing ngs thereon; but such adduce such evidence an order of the commis- th that order by issuing 305 Water Quality Control 25-8-501 a temporary restraining order or injunction at the request of the commission or division. Source: R & RE, L. 81, p. 1325. § 1. Fennel parry manta is not powayaldte to right el ludkW review under section 24-4.106 (4), and by analogy. under subsections (1) and (2) of this section, so long as the concerned plaintiff can show that it is adversely affected or aggrieved by any agency action. Town of Frederick v. Colorado Water Quality Control Comm'n. ` Colo. App. , 628 P.2d 129 (l980). Applied in Colorado Water Quality Control Cornea v. Town of Frederick, _ Colo. _, 641 P.2d 958 (1982). 25-8-405. Samples, secret processes. (1) If samples of water or water pollutants arc taken for analysis and a violation of any permit or control regu- lation is suspected, a representative portion of the sample shall be furnished upon request to the person who is believed to be responsible for such sus- pected violation. A representative portion of such sample shall be furnished to any suspected violator whenever any remedial action is taken with respect thereto by the division. A duplicate of every analytical report pertaining to such sample shall also be furnished as soon as practicable to such person. (2) Any information relating to any secret process, method of manufac- ture or production, or sales or marketing data which may be acquired, ascer- tained, or discovered, whether in any sampling investigation, emergency investigation, or otherwise, shall not be publicly disclosed by any member, officer, or employee of the commission or the division. but shall be kept confidential. Any person seeking to invoke the protection of this subsection (2) shall bear the burden of proving its applicability. This section shall never be interpreted as preventing full disclosure of effluent data. Source: R & RE, L. 81, p. 1326, § 1. PART 5 PERMIT SYSTEM 25.8-50L Permits required for discharge of pollutants • administration. (1) No person shall discharge any pollutant into any state water from a point source without first having obtained a permit from the division for such dis- charge, and no person shall discharge into a ditch or man-made conveyance for the purpose of evading the requirement to obtain a permit under this arti- cle. Each application for a permit duly filed under the federal act shall be deemed to be a permit application filed under this article, and each permit issued pursuant to the federal act shall be deemed to be a temporary permit issued under this article which shall expire upon expiration of the federal permit. (2) The division shall examine applications for and may issue, suspend. revoke, modify, deny, and otherwise administer permits for the discharge of pollutants into state waters. Such administration shall be in accordance vrith the provisions of this article and regulations promulgated by the commis - Mon. 92106, 304 e. order, or determination by not limited to classification of went management plans. water ntrol regulations. enforcement rders, shall be subject to judi- of this article and article 4 of d determinations of the com- ated, or issued in accordance y final order or determination e district court for the district y final rule, order, or determi- filed within thirty days after final. Rulemaking detern ina- "State Administrative Proce- become final upon issuance proceedings. The period for yed while any application for pending pursuant to section h application is pending shall dicial review an equal length y orders issued pursuant to e and desist order, clean-up c division or commission, or n made, may petition the dis- such order or determination. in which the pollution source such order or determination such order or determination if there is probable cause to serious harm to the affected which the order or determina- °minue, any harmful effects the cessation of the violation be without sufficient corre- d the case to the division for the purpose of adducing d findings thereon; but such lure to adduce such evidence ss of an order of the commis- ce with that order by issuing 305 water Quality Control 25-8.501 a temporary restraining order or injunction at the request of the commission or division. Source. R & RE, L. 81, p, 1325, 4 1. Formal party stuns Is not grereguYlte to right of Judicial eerier under section 24-4-106 (4), and by analogy, under subsections (1) and (2) of this section. so long as the concerned plaintiff can show that it is adversely affected or aggrieved by any agency action. Town of Frederick v. Colorado Water Quality COMM Comnt'n. _ Colo. App. 628 P.2d 129 OM). in Colorado Water Quality Ca.trot Comm'n v. Town of Frederick. _ Colo. 641 P.249Ss (1M. 25.8 405. Samples, secret processes. (1) If samples of water or water pollutants are taken for analysis and a violation of any permit or control regu- lation is suspected. a representative portion of the sample shall be furnished upon request to the person who is believed to be responsible for such sus- pected violation. A representative portion of such sample shall be furnished to any suspected violator whenever any remedial action is taken with respect thereto by the division. A duplicate of every analytical report pertaining to such sample shall also be furnished as soon as practicable to such person. (2) Any information relating to any secret process, method of manufac- ture or production, or sales or marketing data which may be acquired, ascer- tained, or discovered, whether in any sampling investigation, emergency investigation, or otherwise, shall not be publicly disclosed by any member, officer, or employee of the commission or the division, but shall be kept confidential. Any person seeking to invoke the protection of this subsection (2) shall bear the burden of proving its applicability. This section shall never be interpreted as preventing full disclosure of effluent data. Source: R & RE, L. 81, p. 1326, 5 1. PART 5 PERMIT SYSTEM 25.8.501. Permits required for discharge of pollutants - administration. (1) No person shall discharge any pollutant into any state water from a point source without first having obtained a permit from the division for such dis- charge, and no person shall discharge into a ditch or man-made conveyance for the purpose of evading the requirement to obtain a permit under this arti- cle. Each application for a permit duly filed under the federal act shall be deemed to be a permit application filed under this article. and each permit issued pursuant to the federal act shall be deemed to be a temporary permit issued under this article which shall expire upon expiration of the federal permit. (2) The division shall examine applications for and may issue, suspend. revoke, modify, deny, and otherwise administer permits for the discharge of pollutants into state waters. Such administration shall be in accordance with the provisions of this article and regulations promulgated by the commis - 'on. 66 92196t. 1.3.2 1.3.3 1.3.4 1.3.5 1.3.6 1.3.7 1.3.8 Sites for new sanitary landfills shall comply with standards sections 4.1 and 4.2 unless compliance with the standards is by the department in accordance with section 1.3.8 of these regulations. Of waived The construction. operation and closure of all new facilities for solid waste disposal shall comply with designs, specifications and procedures outlined in the certificate of designation application, as amended by department review and local requirements; and with the standards in sections 2.1 through Z.4 and 3.1 through 4.8 of these department regulations. The construction, operation and closure of all approved facilities for solid waste disposal that were granted a certificate of designation before there were requirements for an engineering design and operations report or chat are in operation on the effective dace of these department regulations, shall comply with standards in section 2.1 through 2.4 of these department regulations. Approved facilities for solid wastes disposal that are exempted from certificate of designation requirements under provisions of section 1.4 of these department regulations shall comply with standards in section 2.1 through 2.4 of these regulations, unless permitted or operated in compliance with regulations pursuant co the -Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Act", Title 34. Article 32, Section 101, el sea., CRS 1973, as amended; or the 'Hazardous Waste Act", Title 25. Article 15, Parts 1, 2, and 3, CRS 1973, as amended. t Technical guidelines, including specific technical factors. may be developed and issued by the department co assist applicants, local governments, and the public. An amended application shall be made for a substantial change in operations as defined in section 1.2 of these regulations, and shall be referred to the county board of commissioners and the department for review and approval before such change shall become effective. In its consideration of an application, and in the exercise of its regulatory authority co assure compliance with these regulations, the department and county of jurisdiction may waive compliance with any standard in section 2.2, 2.4, 4.1, 4.2, 6, 8. 9, 10. 11 and 12 provided that: (a) The benefits derived from meeting a standard do not bear a reasonable relationship to the impacts or ocher factors which (b) Such waiver is consistent regulations: and (c) Such waiver is not deemed economic, environmental, and energy are particular to the facility: or with the purposes of the act and these to constitute a material variation from the requirements of these regulations; and (d) The waiver will not cause or allow the violation of any air or water quality standard. 1.3.9 A concise general statement of the basis and purpose for these regulations has been prepared and adopted by the board of health, and hereby incorporated into these department regulations by reference. pursuant to the "Colorado Administrative Procedures A.t', Title 24, Article 4, section 103, C.R.S 1973, as amended. (8) Revised 8/90 92106-'_ • +.i SECTION 2 J1IR2ft0 srAtip2Rns minimum standards All facilities for solid waste disposal shall comply with the following minimum standards of the act: 2.1.1 2.1.2 2.1.3 2.1.4 2.1.5 2.1.6 2.1.7 Revised 8/90 Such sites and facilities shall be located. operated, and maintained in a manner so as co control obnoxious odors and prevent rodent and insect breeding and infestation, and they shall be kept adequately covered during their use. Such sites and facilities shall comply with the health laws, standards, rules, and regulations of the department, the water Quality Control Commission, the Air Quality Control Commission, and all applicable zoning laws and ordinances. No radioactive materials or materials contaminated sy radioactive substances shall be disposed of in sites or facilities not specifically designated for that purpose. A site and facility operated as a sanitary landfill shall provide means of finally disposing of solid wastes on land in a manner to minimize nuisance conditions such as odors, windblown debris, insects, rodents, and smoke; shall provide compacted fill material; shall provide adequate cover with suitable material and surface drainage designated to prevent ponding of water and wind erosion and prevent water and air pollution: and, upon being filled, shall be left in a condition ofsorderliness and good esthetic appearance and capable of blending with the surrounding area. In the operation of such a site and facility, the solid wastes shall be distributed in the smallest area consistent with handling traffic to be unloaded: shall be plated in the most dense volume practicable using moisture and compaction or other method approved by the department; shall be fire, insect, and rodent resistant through the application of an adequate layer or inert material at regular intervals; and shall have a minimum of windblown debris which shall be collected regularly and placed into the fill. Sites and facilities shall be adequately fenced so as co prevent waste material and debris from escaping therefrom, and material and debris shall not be allowed to accumulate along the fence line. Solid wastes deposited at any site/or facility shall not be burned, other than by incineration in accordance with a certificate of designation issued pursuant to section 30-20-105; except chat, in extreme emergencies resulting in the generation of large quantities of combustible materials, authorization for burning under controlled conditions may be given by the department. Any provision of the 'Air Pollution Control Act', Title 25, Article 7, section 108. CRS 1973 as amended, to the contrary notwithstanding, the board of county commissioners in any county with less than twenty-five thousand (25,000) population, according co the latest federal census, is authorized to develop regulations, by resolution, permitting the noncommercial burning y(lo) of trash in the unincorporated area of said county: except that no permit shall be issued which shall allow the county co exceed primary and secondary ambient air quality standards as prescribed by federal laws and regulations adopted pursuant thereto, 2.1.8 As used in subsection 2.1.7 of this section, "noncommercial burning of trash" includes the burning of wood waste in wigwam wood waste burners. 2.2 Ooeracions j ,jndards All facilities for solid waste disposal shall be operated in accordance with the following standards. where applicable, unless said standards are waived in accordance with section 1.3.8 of these department regulations: 2.2.1 Facilities for solid waste disposal shall be kept adequately fenced to prevent unauthorized public access without operator supervision. 2.2.2 Surface waters shall be diverted from, or around, the disposal site and facility and its working face. 2.2.3 Groundwater quality shall be monitored upgradient and downgradienc oe facilities for solid waste disposal when final disposal or liquid evaporative treatment is performed. Depth and locations of monitoring wells to be determined after considering the hydrogeology of the site. (a) Quarterly groundwater sampling and analysis must be performed for the following parameters unless additional or fewer constituents or frequency of testing have been specified by the Department for the facility operating plan or if the Department specifies based on leachate analysis, waste Composition or ocher information. (1) temperature (2) conductivity (3) pH (4) chloride (5) nitrate, nitrite, and ammonia as nitrogen (6) sulfate (7) dissolved iron, cadmium, lead and mercury (8) dissolved zinc and manganese (9) total alkalinity (10) chemical oxygen demand (11) total organic carbon (12) calcium, sodium, potassium and magnesium (b) Test methods used for groundwater analysis shall be according co -----,‘EPA Publication SW -846 'Test Hethods for Evaluating Solid Waste ysical/Chemical Hechods' or an EPA approved method. (c) the owner or operator shall use the Cochran's ApproxrmsLLan Co the 8enrens-Fisher Student's T -test as described in Appendix IV of part 264 of the RCRA Hazardous Waste Regulations or a statistical procedure approved by the Department in the groundwater monitoring plan for determining whether a significant change over background has occurred. 2.2,4 All groundwater and explosive gas monitoring points shall be installed in accordance with applicable rules and regulations of the "Vater We11 and Pump Installation Contractor's Act", Title 37, Article 91. Part 1, CRS 1973 as amended, and the water quality and gas concentrations of samples taken from the wells shall be determined by the facility operator. 6b Revised 8/90 (11) 921.06 G,3 ee •e disposal 3.1.1 Any person proposing to operate a facility for solid wastes disposal within the unincorporated portion of any county shall apply to the commissioners of the county in which the site is co be located for a certificate of designation. 3.1.2 The application 'shall include a nonrefundable three hundred dollar (8300) fee and at least five (5) copies or as many additional copies as specified by local requirements, of an engineering design and operations report prepared in accordance with sections 3.1 through 4.8 of these regulations, unless the proposed solid waste disposal facility is a privately operated solid waste -co -energy incineration facility not under contract to a county and/or municipality or is a solid waste incineration facility, in which ease sections 3.1 and 10.2 through 10.5 shall apply. The application shall also include all ocher documents specified by local requirements. 3.1.3 After receipt of an application, the commissioners shall forward copies of the application dat least four copies e design and operations report to the department for review andiaearing recommendation for approval or disapproval. 3.1.4 Recommendations on certificate of designation applications, including the engineering design and operations report, shall be based upon compliance with the act and these department regulations. Revised 8/90 (14) C C 22106" l lam.51 Co SECTION 2 d7NINUM ITAN1mAcrn$ 1 cotnimum teandarnt All facilities for solid waste dispoaal shall comply with the following minimum standards of the act: 2.1.1 Such sites and facilities shall be located, operated, and maintained in a manner so as co control obnoxious odors and prevent rodent and insect breeding and infestation, and they shall be kept adequately covered during their use. 2.1.2 Such sites and facilities shall comply with the health laws, standards. tales, and regulations of the department, the Water Quality Control Commission, the Air Quality Control Commission, and all applicable zoning Laws and ordinances. 2.1.3 No radioactive materials or materials contaminated 5y radioactive substances shall be disposed of in sites or facilities not specifically designated for that purpose. 2.1.4 A site and facility operated as a sanitary landfill shall provide means of finally disposing of solid wastes on land in a manner to minimize nuisance conditions such as odors, windblown debris, insects, rodents, and smoke; shall provide compacted fill material: shall provide adequate cover with suitable material and surface drainage designated to prevent ponding of water and wind erosion and prevent water and air pollution; and, upon being filled, shall be left in a condition ofcorderliness and goad esthetic appearance and capable of blending with the surrounding area. In the operation of such a site and facility, the solid wastes shall be distributed in the smallest area consistent with handling traffic co be unloaded: shall be placed in the most dense volume practicable using moisture and compaction or other method approved by the department; shall be fire, insect, and rodent resistant through the application of an adequate layer or inert material at regular intervals; and shall have a minimum of windblown debris which shall be collected regularly and placed into the fill. 2.1.5 2.1.6 2.1.7 Revised 8/90 Sites and facilities shall be adequately fenced so as co prevent waste material and debris from escaping therefrom, and material and debris shall not be allowed to accumulate along the fence line. Solid wastes deposited at any site/or facility shall not be burned, other than by incineration in accordance with a certificate of designation issued pursuant co section 30-20-105; except that, in extreme emergencies resulting in the generation of large quantities of combustible materials, authorization for burning under controlled conditions may be given by the department. Any provision of the 'Air Pollution Control Act", Title 25, Article 7, section 108. CRS 1973 as amended, co the contrary notwithstanding, the board of county commissioners in any county with less than twenty-five thousand (25,000) population, according co the latest federal census, is authorized to develop regulations, by resolution, permitting the noncommercial burning k(l0) 921.06n 304 er. or determination by 'red to classification of agement plans, water gulations, enforcement shall be subject to judi- s article and article 4 of erminations of the com- or issued in accordance order or determination rict court for the district rule, order, or determi- within thirty days after Rulemaking determina- e Administrative Proce- me final upon issuance eedings. The period for bile any application for g pursuant to section lication is pending shall review an equal length ers issued pursuant to desist order, clean-up sion or commission. or c, may petition the dis- order or determination. ich the pollution source order or determination order or determination re is probable cause to s harm to the affected the order or determin- e, any harmful effects essation of the violation 'thout sufficient cone - e case to the division e purpose of adducing rags thereon; but such adduce such evidence order of the commis- th that order by issuing 305 Water Quality Control 254501 a temporary restraining order or injunction at the request of the commission or division. Source: R & RE, L. 81, p. 1325, § 1. Fennel party stator is not prereguWte to right et jndldal review under section 24+106 (4), and by analogy, under subsections([) and (2) of this section, so long as the concerned plaintiff can show that it is adversely affected or aggrieved by any agency action. Town of Frederick v. Colorado Water Quality Control Comm'n. Colo. App. _� 628 P.2d 129 (1980). Applied in Colorado Water Quality Control Conlin v. Town of Frederick, Colo. �.64L P.2d958(L962). 25-8.405. Samples, secret processes. (1) If samples of water or water pollutants are taken for analysis and a violation of any permit or control regu- lation is suspected, a representative portion of the sample shall be furnished upon request to the person who is believed to be responsible for such sus- pected violation. A representative portion of such sample shall be furnished to any suspected violator whenever any remedial action is taken with respect thereto by the division. A duplicate of every analytical report pertaining to such sample shall also be furnished as soon as practicable to such person. (2) Any information relating to any secret process, method of manufac- ture or production, or sales or marketing data which may be acquired, ascer- tained, or discovered, whether in any sampling investigation, emergency investigation, or otherwise, shall not be publicly disclosed by any member. officer, or employee of the commission or the division, but shall be kept confidential. Aay person seeking to invoke the protection of this subsection (2) shall bear the burden of proving its applicability. This section shall never be interpreted as preventing full disclosure of effluent data. Source: R & RE, L. 81, p. 1326, § 1. PART 5 PERMIT SYSTEM 25-8-501. Permits required for discharge of pollutants - administration. (1) No person shall discharge any pollutant into any state water from a point source without first having obtained a permit from the division for such dis- charge, and no person shall discharge into a ditch or man-made conveyance for the purpose of evading the requirement to obtain a permit under this arti- cle. Each application for a permit duly filed under the federal act shall be deemed to be a permit application filed under this article, and each permit issued pursuant to the federal act shall be deemed to be a temporary permit issued under this article which shall expire upon expiration of the federal permit, (2) The division shall examine applications for and may issue, suspend. revoke. modify, deny, and otherwise administer permits for the discharge of pollutants into state waters. Such administration shall be in accordance with the provisions of this article and regulations promulgated by the commis- sion. 6-C • b. the nature and location of the activity and of its discharge; and c. existing ground water quality that may be affected by the activity; and d. relevant geologic and hydrogeologic conditions, including but not limited to the presence of ground water hydrologically connected to surface waters and recharge areas. 2. In the absence of an existing or proposed activity, the shape, depth, boundaries, and extent of a specified area may be determined by considering: a. the presence, extent, and nature of existing uses of ground water and the nature of reasonably expected future uses of ground water; and b. existing ground water quality; and c. relevant geologic and hydrogeolcgic conditions, including but not limited to the presence of ground water hydrologically connected to surface waters and recharge areas. 3.11.5 GROUND WATER QUALITY STANDARDS The water quality standards specified in Subsections A and 3 below are deemed necessary and appropriate to protect ground water uses as specified in Section 3.11.4, and shall be adopted to protect such classified uses. The standards specified in Subsection C apply to all State ground waters, unless alternative site -specific standards have been adopted for a specified area pursuant to Subsection D below. A. Narrative Standards 1. Ground Water shall be free from pollutants not listed in the Tables referred to in Section 3.11.5(3), which alone or in combination with other substances, are in concentrations shown to be: a. Carcinogenic, mutagenic, teratogenic, or toxic to human beings, and/or, 6 GG- 931.46, G7 • • b. A danger to the public health, safety, or welfare. 2. Determinations made pursuant to Section 3.11.7 of specific numerical limitations under this subsection shall be based upon the best scientific information currently available. 8. Numeric Standards 1. The numeric standards shall be measured as total concentrations unless otherwise specified in Tables 1 through 4. 2. When a ground water has a multi -use classification, the most restrictive standard for a parameter shall apply. 3. The following numeric standards shall apply: a. 'Domestic Use - Quality" - The Human Health and Secondary Drinking Water Standards listed in Tables 1 and 2, respectively, except as specified in Section 3.11.5(8)5. b. "Agricultural Use - Quality" - The Agricultural Standards listed in Table 3, except as specified in Section 3.11.5(8)5. c. "Surface Water Quality Protection" - The standards necessary to prevent the exceedance of surface waters standards. d. "Potentially Usable Quality" - appropriate standards considering those factors listed in Section 3.11.4(8)(4)(d). 4. The TDS limitation listed in Table 4 shall apply to the following classes: "Agricultural Use - Quality" "Surface Water Quality Protection" 'Potentially Usable Quality" GG 9 JOG! 67 Section 3,11,50 3. Interim Organic Pollutants Standards: Note that all standards in Table A are being adopted as interim standards.- These interim standards will remain in effect until alternative permanent standards are adopted by the Commission in revisions to this regulation or site -specific standards determinations. Although fully effective with respect to current regulatory applications, these interim standards shall not be considered final or permanent standards subject to restrictions such as antibacksliding or downgrading. 4. Whenever the current detection level (PQL) for a pollutant is higher (less stringent) than a standard listed in Subsection 2 or 3 above, the detection level shall be used as the performance standard in regulating specific activities. The detection levels (PQL's) identified in Table A shall apply, unless and until they are modified as the result of a subsequent rulamaking hearing. 5. Nothing in thin regulation shall be interpreted to preclude: a. An agency responsible for implementation of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), 42 Q.S.C. 9601, fl seo., as amended, from selecting a remedial action and a point of compliance that are more or less stringent than would be achieved by compliance with the statewide numerical standards established in this subsection, or alternative site -specific standards adopted by the Commission, where a determination is made that such a variation is authorized pursuant to the applicable provisions of CERCLA; or 9 931061 7/ TABLE A GROUND WATER ORGANIC CHEMICAL STANDARDS (in micrograms per liter) Parameter CAS No, Dichlorobenzene 1,2 95-50-1 Dichlorobenzene 1,3 541-73-1 Dichlorobenzene 1,4 106-37-6 Dichloroethane 1,2c 107-06-2 Dichloroethylene 1,1 75-35-4 Dichloroethylene 1,2 -cis 156-59-2 Dichloroethylene 1,2 -trans 156-60-5 Dichlorophenol 2,4 120-83-2 Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) 94-75-7 STANDARD1 620 620 za2 1.0 1.0 75M 1.0 0.4 7 70 100 21 70 Dichloropropane 1,2c 0.56 78-87-5 Dieldrinc 60-57-1 Dinitrophenol 2,4 51-28-5 Dioxin (2,3,7,8 TCDD)c 1746-01-6 Diphenylhydrarine 1,2c 122-66-7 Endrin 72-20-8 Endrin aldehyde 7421-93-4 1.0 1.0 50 1.0 1.0 0.002 0.1* 14 50 2.2x10'7 0.05 0.2 0.1* 0.2M 0.1 931061 73 • • TALE A GROUND NAM ORGANIC CWQCAL STANDARDS (in micrograms per liter) Parameter CAS,NO. Toluene 108-88-3 ToxapheneC 8001-35-2 Trichloroethane 1,1,1 71-55-6 Trichloroethane 1,1,2 79-00-5 TrichloroethyleneC 79-01-6 Trichlorophenol 2,4,6c 88-06-2 Trichlorophenoxyproprionic acid (2,4,5-tp) 93-72-1 vinyl ChlorideC 75-01-4 ITANDARDI 1,000 0.03 200 3 5 2 re2 1.0 50 50 0.5* 2M 2 I All standards are chronic or 30 -day standards. They are based on information contained in EPA's Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) and/or EPA lifetime health advisories for drinking water using a 10-6 incremental risk factor unless otherwise noted. 2 PQL's are detection levels based on the Colorado Department of Health's labor- atories best judgement for Gar Chromotography/Mass Spectrophotometry (GC/MS) unless otherwise noted. C Carcinogens classified by the EPA as A, 81, or B2. M Drinking water MCL. * Cas Chromatography (GC) PQL **High Pressure Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) PQL. CAS No. - Chemical Abstracts Service Registry Number (HK) - Halomethanee 4127m/0183m/dg - 13 - 931os %5 •• STATE &!DLOFADO COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Dedicated to protecting and impprwo�ithe health and environment of the people of Coklrado 4300 Cherry Creek Or. 5. tabsaoey Building Denver, Colorado 00222.1530 4210 E. 11th Avenue Phone (303) 697.2000 Denver, Colorado 00220-J716 (303) 691-4700 December 21, 1992 Bill Hedberg Waste Services Corporation 5660 Greenwood Plaza Blvd., Suite 400 Englewood, Colorado 80111 Roy Romer Caeca CERiitit,D # P 895 190 471.aui®tiNam,aa,,4n4 RECE; v rec.,Q " DEC7992 1:722..i .;,a ,r 3Vs;;rn.__:-_.. RE: Additional Hydrogeological and Geotechnical Characterization and Site Operations Central Weld Sanitary Landfill Weld County, Colorado Dear Mr. Hedberg: The Hazardous Materials and Waste Management Division of the Colorado Department of Health (the Division) has completed the review of the following documents submitted by Waste Services Corporation: Hydrogeological and Geotechnical Characterization for the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, Volume I and II; Groundwater Monitoring Plan for the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill; Landfill Gas Monitoring Plan for Central Weld Sanitary Landfill; Confirmation Groundwater Sampling Results for Central Weld Sanitary Landfill; Expanded Hydrogeological Investigation at the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill; Central Weld Sanitary Landfill Third Quarter 1992 Landfill Gas Monitoring Results; Central Weld Sanitary Landfill Third Quarter 1992 Groundwater Sampling Results; and Additional Surface Water Sampling and Analysis at the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. These reviews have been made under the authority of the Solid Waste Disposal Site and Facilities Act, Title 30, Article 20, Part 1, C.R.S. as amended and with the Regulations promulgated thereunder, 6 CCR 1007-2 (the Regulations). The proposed revised Solid Waste Regulations were also given consideration. The operation of this facility will be governed by these regulations as soon as they become effective. Based on the information presented in these documents the Division has identified three areas of concern: A. Issues which are incomplete or needing clarification. B. Operational improvements. C. Areas of non-compliance. 92106r? 77.._ r •! •. Bill Hedberg Central Weld Sanitary Landfill December 21, 1992 page 2/5 A. ISSUES WHICH ARE INCOMPLETE OR NEEDING CLARIFICATION 1. Point #2 from the October 27, 1992 letter sent by the Division requested a cross-section relating the on -site geology and hydrology to all ground water wells within a 1/4 mile of the facility. Please provide this information. 2. Please provide documentation which would identify if the retention pond is in direct communication with ground water, and provide clarification between the relationship of the retention pond and ground water. 3. There seems to be some confusion over Point #8 from the October 27, 1992 letter. The Division requests cross -sections along (intercepting monitoring points TP-1, TP-6 and GWMW-7) and perpendicular (intercepting monitoring points GWMW-6, TP-6, TP-7 SG -14 and SG -11) to the underdrain. The Division apologizes for any misunderstanding. 4. Please provide as -built drawings for the perimeter french drain. If as -built drawings are not available, provide an illustration which shows the extent of lined portions, thicknesses and types of construction materials, and relationship of geologic and saturated geologic units to the french drain. 5. The Division requests that additional hydrogeologic evaluations be performed to the west of the facility. This investigation shall determine whether the Spomer Lakes are influencing ground water characteristics along the western boundary of the facility. 6. To understand the relationship between the quality of ground water from the private wells in the vicinity of the site and those at the facility, the Division requests that the following wells be sampled, (permit # 159091, #765, #11090, and #90580). These wells shall be analyzed for the identical parameters as the monitoring wells at the facility. Please provide cross - sections through the private wells to show the relationship of the landfill geologic and saturated geologic units to those of the private wells. 7. Figure 1 from "Responses to Colorado Department of Health Comments on the Hydrogeologic and Geotechnical Characterization Report for the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill" indicates an historical maximum water level What is the date of this water level? Please illustrate the top of the ground water surface between monitoring points. Ground water is shown below the completion depth of trash piezometer TP-4. Please provide an explanation/data which verifies the depth of ground water at this location. 93106t. G Bill Hedberg Central Weld Sanitary Landfill December 21, 1992 page 3/5 8. Please explain why the detection limits were increased (Central Weld Sanitary Landfill Third Quarter 1992 Groundwater Sampling Results) for volatile organic analyses for monitoring well GWMW-5N. It appears that these limits were raised exclusively on GWMW-5N. In addition, VOC samples from monitoring wells GWMW-5N and GWMW-10, wheu checked by the lab (PX), did not have the required preservation of a pH less than 2. In the Division's judgement these samples are invalid and these wells must be resampled. B. OPERATIONAL IMPROVEMENTS 1. In the judgement of the Division, the number of ground water monitoring points are not adequate for the southern and southeastern boundaries of the facility to delineate contaminant migration. To improve the ground water monitoring situation the Division request that additional nested wells be installed along the south and southeastern property boundaries. Please provide all information to the Division for review. 2. Please provide documentation which demonstrates that the french drain is adequate to transport water and prevent continued recharge to the shallow aquifer. If the construction of the perimeter french drain is not appropriate, please provide design improvements. 3. Surface water sample locations (landfill underdrain, north discharge pipe, discharge from the french drain into the retention pond, and Spomer Lakes) shall be sampled for eight (8) consecutive quarters. 4. All deep ground water monitoring wells shall be monitored for eight (8) consecutive quarters and include all parameters as requested by the Division. Monitoring frequency and parameters may be modified, at the request of the applicant and approval by the Division, after completion of required background sampling. 5. The proposed revised Solid Waste Regulations do not allow for field filtering of water samples. Please make this change in all texts and implement this plan during the next sampling event. 92106". 79 N N Bill Hedberg Central Weld Sanitary Landfill December 21, 1992 page 4/5 6. Table 5-1 in the "Groundwater Monitoring Plan for Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, Weld County, Colorado" is inadequate. The following parameters shall be added to Table 5-1: all 34 volatile organic compounds (VOCs) included in the "Hydrogeological and Geotechnical Characterization for the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill;" carbon disulfide; dichlorodifluoromethane and trichlorofluoromethane; radionuclides; chromium; barium and nickel. Table 5-1 shall be changed to read "Groundwater and Surface Water Parameter List Central Weld Sanitary Landfill." 7. All piezometers shall be monitored for depth to ground water. Monitoring shall be conducted during each quarterly sampling event and data submitted to the Division. 8. The Division requests that those constituents identified from monitoring well GWMW-5N (target parameter list) be analyzed on a monthly basis. Sampling shall commence during January 1993 and continue for twelve (12) consecutive months. Routine quarterly sampling of this well shall continue for the established suite of parameters. If additional constituents are identified during quarterly sampling they will be added to the target list. The Division will evaluate sample frequency and parameters after completion of this sampling schedule. C. AREAS OF NON-COMPLIANCE 1. Central Weld Sanitary Landfill has contaminated the ground water. This is a violation of subsection 2.1.4 of the Regulations. The Regulations clearly state a site and facility operated as a sanitary landfill shall prevent water pollution. Please provide a corrective action plan which addresses the contamination issues on and off site. 2. Solid wastes have been placed into ground water at this facility. The Purpose, Scope and Applicability as defined in Section 3 of the proposed revised State's Solid Waste Regulations, defines standards for new landfills, existing landfills and lateral expansions. Subsection 3.1.11 (draft of November 5, 1992) states "landfills shall not place wastes below or into surface water or groundwater_" • Bill Hedberg Central Weld Sanitary Landfill December 21, 1992 page 5/5 Please be aware, the Division fully expects the proposed revised Solid Waste Regulations will become effective in the very near future. At that time Central Weld Sanitary Landfill will be in violation of area 'C, point #2 as detailed above. As the owner and operator of this facility, Waste Services Corporation, is notified that the areas of non-compliance described above are a public nuisance. Please be advised that the Division will take whatever action is deemed appropriate and necessary to obtain correction of these violations and protect the public health and environment. These conclude the Division's comments concerning issues raised about Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Please respond to the issues detailed above in a comprehensive document within two weeks of the receipt of this letter. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at 303-692-3437. Roger Doak Geologist Solid Waste Section Hazardous Materials and Waste Management Division cc: File: Glenn F. Mallory Section Leader Solid Waste Section Hazardous Materials and Waste Management Division Mid, Weld County Health Department L Morrison, Weld County Assistant Attorney A. Scheere, Waste Management of North America B. Taylor, CDH, WQCD L Perrault, Attorney General's Office Weld County Department of Planning Weld County Commissioners SW/WLD/CEN/Correspondence 921061_47/ March 5, 1993 To: Glenn Mallory solid Waste Program FROM: Laura E. Perrault Assistant Attorney General eral T O: Dan Miller First Assistant Attorney General RE: Central Weld Landfill Request of 6 CCR 1007-2, S 2.1a4° Interpretation MAR '993 ckaround On December 21, 2992, the Hazardous Materials and Waste Management Division of the Colorado Department of Health ("CDH") notified Waste Services Corporation ("Waste Services") that CDH had completed its review of several technical documents submitted by Waste Services regarding studies and monitoring plans and results for the surface water, groundwater and landfill gas media at the Central Weld Landfill. As a result of this review, CDR determined, in part, that: Central Weld Sanitary Landfill has contaminated the ground water. This is a violation of subsection 2.1.4 of the Regulations [6 CCR 1007-2]. The Regulations cclearly sanitary a site and facility operated as pollution landfill shall prevent water Please provide a corrective action plan which addresses the contamination issues on and off site. e to itWa t e�Se in esoxh s contested the application of section 2.1.4 opinion of the landfill. CDH has requested a written this isofe. Section 2.1.4 states: A site and facility operated as landfill r a sanitary aside Pane r tom i .thizi 9 s_ 6 6e "'d 411.06". 56:II 11111 ES -it -E4 �� , shall eprovide compacted fill material; Stall a being tilled, shall be lett in a conditionpoof orderliness and good aesthetic appearance and capable of blending with the surrounding area. (emphasis added). Waste Services, objection to the application of section 2.1.4 to the Central Weld Landfill is somewhat convoluted and seems to be of which based on a slight misunderstanding between CDH and Waste Services portion of section 2.1.4 is at issue, and on a Misinterpr tationof this regulation by both Waste Services and CDR. In a February 2, 1993 memo, Waste Services focused on the "adequate cover" portion of section 2.1.4. To its disadvantage, Waste services misread this portion as requiring that the operators of a landfill must "provide adequate cover with suitable material and surface drainage designated [sic) kgrsrey_ent.„_,__,jgaer and air tier. " (emphasis added), Perhaps Waste Services, reading was based, in part on CDR's December 21, 1992, letter, which incorrectly stated that section 2.1.4 requires be operated to "prevent water pollution." Sect on 2.1.4, however, does not contain this mandate; rather, it requires that "adequate cover" and "surface drainages prevent the " pollution. " A411¢iltg of watgr and air Based on its incorrect reading of section 2.1.4, Waste Services' memo addressed a tangential and irrelevant issue whether an adequate cover and effective surface drainage alone can prevent groundwater contamination. Waste Services concluded that, because a number of other factors contribute to groundwater tonta ti nationn, not the existence of groundwater contamination beneath designed or operated in ion" evidence that a landfill has been 2.1.4. Although Waste Services' memo of this permit of section that the existence of is correct in its assumption evidence that a landfill has daPoor cover orer abad nsurface is not ra �s its memo never addressed one of the real issues here -- drainage, Central Weld landfill has an adequate coverwhether the which prevents the pending of water. Thus, and surface drainage m in violation of this portion of section 2..4.. Services may be • Moreover, Waste Services may be in violation of another portion of section 2.1.4. which the Waste Services, memo does not address. Section 2.1.4 also states that a landfill must be operated to "minimize nuisance conditions." "Nuisance conditions" is defined under 6 CCR 1007-2, S 1.2 as "those which may result from . . water pollution _ " As CDH has definition makes no distinction between pointed nout, this t pollution. Thus, CDR may _ ground and surface water groundwater contaminatioexists in a'tthefgroundw groundwater amount of beneath the 9.3106e. 96: E3 C� Ea 'd . • , facility, thefacility conditions." notbe operating in a to "minimize the nuisance landfill does not have may be duemanner or it may be due toto ace an adequate cover or fact that measures. the operator's failure to take surface araiothe, certain other In response to cva's claim, during a phone conversation with Waste Service's legal representative, Waste S that "nuisance conditions" aaj result from and thatServices acknowledged aWnd Sthat groundwater es claimed that ion does exist at grouns ter pollution, groundwater no actual "nuisance" the site. However, this pollution b affected by, this contaminated use no one is tAe resulted from groundwater. Presently using, or is Although this interpretation has some scintilla is too narrow. s AcDictionary,to the legal definition of " found iw of merit, it found in Batlack's ck's Law The a nuisance" probably nu already OCCby act, or by failure dictionary defines already causing to perform public nuisance as ghn_ �or permitting a condition to exist duty, intentionallynjursor The dictionary defines shasfety e.„ which injures . destroys or private nuisance as " (emphasis added) . persons ror S.eriorates h ono my wrongful act which • interferes with their la of an e ior enjoy -al or o thereof . " (emphasis addedce lawful use or enjoyment or a few Plowing oft site and may be n used ib contaminated groundwater Is flowinthe public" health and safety and a re, co, it endangers The contamination and, ,a constitutes a public well, because it has deterioratedrivate property. offsiteofPsitnuisance, as But eV groundwater property, occurred, even assuming Waste Services may sill tail a nuisance per thisse has not yet requirement. Arguably, the term "nuisance to meet . regulatorybroader than the term "nuisance." Section 2. conditions" is n actual "nuisance" be created l•4 does violation of before CDHnot mandate that in violatio must minimizec^ion, rather, it can fins a company in operator must nuisance conditions." clearly states that an ° take steps to- In other a an of a nuisance. As COB has Prevent the posaibilit•words, orto do this. Leachate pointed out, Waste Services hasfailedgroundwater and this contaminated om the landfill has contaminated groundwater is flowing oft site. CONCQK In short, although CD incorrectly stated that sect g H legitimately ladfiloperator Waste revent water pollution " CDR central weld concluded onclue that services' Services can either can necessaryrefutethisclaim by showing ears to violate this thaoperation attitn. Of Waste every it can comply with Cstoeminimize ground waterg t it has taken,O which do quest and draft a contamination, an meet which�ents what further actions it corrective action rpto section 2.1.4.. plans to take in order to 60 'd 9.31.06?, 96:Ii (liii es -II -i(HA 8`% 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 3.1.5 OWNERS OR OPERATORS OF NEW LANDFILLS, EXISTING LANDFILLS AND EXPANSIONS OF EXISTING LANDFILLS LOCATED IN AN UNSTABLE AREA MUST DEMONSTRATE THAT ENGINEERING MEASURES HAVE BEEN INCORPORATED INTO THE FACILITY'S DESIGN TO ENSURE THAT THE INTEGRITY OF THE STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS OF THE FACILITY WILL NOT BE DISRUPTED. THE OWNER OR OPERATOR SHALL PLACE THE DEMONSTRATION IN THE OPERATING RECORD OF THE FACILITY AND IN THE FACILITY FILE OF THE DEPARTMENT. THE OWNER OR OPERATOR SHALL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING FACTORS, AT A MINIMUM, WHEN DETERMINING WHETHER AN AREA IS UNSTABLE: 1) ON -SITE OR LOCAL SOIL CONDITIONS THAT MAY RESULT IN SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENTIAL SETTLING; 2) ON -SITE OR LOCAL GEOLOGIC OR GEOMORPHOLOGIC FEATURES; AND 3) ON -SITE OR LOCAL HUMAN -MADE FEATURES OR EVENTS (BOTH SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE). 3.1.6 THE TOPOGRAPHY OF THE SITE SHALL MAXIMIZE PROTECTION AGAINST PREVAILING WINDS ON -SITE AND MINIMIZE THE AMOUNT OF PRECIPITATION CATCH',IENT AREA UPGRADIENT OF THE SITE. 3.1.7 LANDFILLS SHALL NOT BE LOCATED IN A FLOODPLAIN. 3.1.8 LANDFILLS SHALL BE SITED NO CLOSER TO DOMESTIC WELLS OR SPRINGS SHOWN TO TAP THE UPPERMOST AQUIFER DOWNGRADIENT OF THE SITE, THAN THAT DISTANCE GROUND WATER BENEATH THE SITE WOULD FLOW DURING THE FACILITY'S OPERATING LIFE AND POST -CLOSURE CARE PERIOD, UNLESS ADEQUATE GROUND WATER PROTECTION IS PROVIDED. 3.1.9 LANDFILLS SHALL ISOLATE WASTES FROM THE PUBLIC AND ENVIRONMENT BY EMPHASIZING FAVORABLE GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS OVER ENGINEERED IMPROVEMENTS OF MARGINAL GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS. 3.1.10 LANDFILLS SHALL NOT PLACE WASTES BELOW OR INTO SURFACE WATER OR GROUND WATER. CONTINUED OPERATION OF SITES AND FACILITIES THAT HAVE PLACED WASTE INTO GROUND WATER IS PROHIBITED. B.ECTZON 3.2 DESIGN REDUIREMENTS 3.2.1 GEOLOGIC DATA THE ENGINEERING DESIGN AND OPERATIONS REPORT SHALL INCLUDE, AS A MINIMUM, THE FOLLOWING GEOLOGIC DATA: (1) TYPES AND REGIONAL THICKNESS OF UNCONSOLIDATED SOILS MATERIALS; (2) TYPES AND REGIONAL THICKNESS OF CONSOLIDATED BEDROCK MATERIALS; (3) REGIONAL AND LOCAL GEOLOGIC STRUCTURE, INCLUDING BEDROCK STRIKE AND DIP, AND FRACTURE PATTERNS; AND (4) GEOLOGIC HAZARDS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO SLOPE STABILITY, FAULTING, FOLDING, ROCKFALL, LANDSLIDES, SUBSIDENCE OR EROSION POTENTIAL, THAT MAY AFFECT THE DESIGN AND OPERATION OF THE FACILITY FOR SOLID WASTES DISPOSAL. DRAFT STATE SOLID WASTE + SUBTITLE D REGULATIONS December 24, 1992 53 4:106'_ �,s- • • 11111De COLORADO March 19, 1993 William J. Hedberg Waste Services Corporation 6037 77th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80634 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 1st? • 16 AVENUE COURT GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 ADMINISTRATION 003)353 -owe HEALTH PROTECTION (303) fvrol3 COMMUNITY HEALTH (303) 353.0619 Dear Mr. Hedberg: On March 2, 1993, a representative of the Environmental Protection Division o£ the Weld County Health Department inspected the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. located at 6037 77th Avenue, Greeley. in Weld County, Colorado. The purpose of the inspection was to inspect and assess the facility's compliance with the "Regulations Pertaining to Solid Waste Disposal Sites and Facilities" (The Regulations) as promulgated by the Solid Waste Disposal Sites and Facilities Act (the Act), Title 30, Article 20, Part 1, C.R.S. On the date March 2. 1993, field inspection, and subsequent record review, the following observations were made: 1. The facility does not possess an approved Design and Operations plan. 2. As previously documented, the facility has contaminated groundwater at this location. 3. As documented, the facility has allowed trash to come into contact with groundwater. 4. The facility continues to operate without the required discharge permits. This facility is currently operating without an approved Design and Operations plan as required by Section 30-20-103 of the Act. It is acknowledged, that the facility is currently in the process of preparing all necessary documents. It has been documented. that previously disposed solid waste materials is currently exposed to groundwater and that groundwater pollution has occurred at this location. Section 2.1.4 of The Regulations states "A site and facility operated as a sanitary landfill shall provide means of finally disposing of solid wastes on land in a manner to minimized nuisance conditions....- and that 921o6 COLORADO DEPARTMENT OP PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303) 353-3845, EXT. 3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 1400 N. 17TH AVENUE GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 March 2, 1993 Waste Services Corporation 40000 Weld County Road 25 Ault, CO 80610 Subject: ZCH-96 Dear Sirs: The Probable Cuase Public Hearing originally scheduled for March 24, 1993, HAS BEEN RESCHEDULED by the Board of County Commissioners. Notice is hereby given that on Monday, April 5, 1993, at 9:00 a.m., or as soon thereafter as the agenda of the Board of County Commissioners permits, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County will hold a Probable Cause public hearing pursuant to Section 81 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance and the policies and procedures of the Weld County Administrative Manual. This meeting will take place in the Commissioners' Hearing Room, Veld County Centennial Center. 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado. The purpose of this public hearing will be to review Case Number SUP -116 for compliance with conditions of approval as approved by the Board of County Commissioners on October 6, 1971, to determine if probable cause exists to hold a hearing on revocation of SUP - 116. Mr. John Pickle, in his memorandum dated February 22, 1993, has identified the items of non-compliance with conditions of approval for SUP -116. A copy of his memorandum is attached. If it is determined at the public hearing that there is probable cause that you are not in compliance with SUP -116 the Board of County Commissioners will schedule a Show Cause public hearing to consider revocation of the Special Review permit. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call or write. Respectfully, C � Chuck Cun�i f AICF Director enclosure pc: William J. Hedberg Marian King Bill Jeffry Lee Morrison vdohn Pickle 321.06. /7 mEmoRaMum WIDc. COLORADO To From subject: Chuck Cunlif£e. Planning John Pickle, Heal Central Weld Sanitary Landfill February 22, 1993 This memorandum is a follow-up to our meeting with Waste Management and Waste Services on February 18, 1993. Since that time, I have also met with Glenn Mallory, and Roger Doak, Solid Waste Division, and Pat Nelson, Water Quality Division, Colorado Department of Health. In response to these meetings, it is the opinion of this Division that the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill continues in a state of non-compliance. We submit the following areas of concern as violations: 1. The operators of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill have not submitted a complete Design and Operations Plan. (See attached letter of February 22, 1993). This is a violation of C.R.S. 30-20-103. 2. The Central Weld Sanitary Landfill continues to operate without required Discharge Permits. This is a violation of Subsection 2.1.2. of the Solid Waste Regulations, and 25-8-501, C.R.S. In conference with Pat Nelson. Water Quality Division, their position is that the absence of the required permits constitutes technical violation of the Rules; however, they are holding further enforcement in abeyance so long as this facility continues to proceed in good faith with the Discharge Permit application process. Our Division agrees with this position. 3. The Central Weld Sanitary Landfill continues to contaminate the groundwater. A review of the Hydrogeologic and Geotechnical Characterization and supporting documents indicate that a portion of this contamination is due to a lack of adequate cover and adequate surface drainage. This is a violation of Subsections 2.1.2 of the Solid Waste Regulations, specifically, 3.11.5 of the Water Quality Control Commission Rules, and 2.1.4. of the Solid Waste Regulations. In conference with Glenn Mallory and Roger Doak, Solid Waste Division, Colorado Department of Health, their position is still as outlined in their letter of December 23, 1992. 4. The Central Weld Sanitary Landfill has allowed solid waste to come into contact with groundwater on this site. A review of the Hydrogeologic and Geotechnical Characterization and supporting documents indicate that this condition is due to a lack of adequate cover and adequate surface drainage. This is a violation of Subsections 2.1.2 of the Solid Waste Regulations, specifically, 3.11.5 of the Water Quality Control Commission Rules, and 2.1.4. of the Solid Waste Regulations. In addition. this will be a violation of Subsection 3.1.10 of revised Solid Waste Regulations, which are schedule effective in April, 1993. :3106. •r. la w._.., tfl.,.twirr • • This Division, and the Colorado Department of Health continue to feel that items it 3 and It 4 constitute a public nuisance. Consequently, we would request that these violations be brought to the attention of the Hoard of County Commissioners, in the form of a public hearing. Should you need additional information, please contact me. ENV\342 XC: Lee Morrison, Assistant County Attorney Randolph Gordon, M.D., M.P.H. Glenn Mallory, Solid Waste Division David Holm, Water Quality Division 92106". '7 fe.;>„ COLORADO i • MEmORMUM To From Subject Chuck Cunliffe, Planning _ March 30, 1993 John Pickle, Rea Central Weld Sanitary Landfill On March 2, 1993, Trevor Jiricek of our staff inspected the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. The purpose of the inspection was to assess the facility's compliance with the "Regulations Pertaining to Solid Waste Disposal Site's and Facilities", as promulgated by the Solid Waste Disposal Sites and Facilities Act, Title 30, Article 20, Part 1, C.R.S. The facility continues in a state of non-compliance as previously cited in my memo to you of 2-21-92: 1. The operators have not submitted a complete Design and Operations Plan. 2. The Central Weld Sanitary Landfill continues to operate without required Discharge Permits. 3. The Central Weld Sanitary Landfill continues to contaminate the groundwater. 4. The Central Weld Sanitary Landfill has allowed solid waste to come into contact with groundwater on this site. I met with Bill Hedberg, Site Manager on March 23, 1993. Although we primarily discussed other matters, no mention was made of any change in these areas of non- compliance. In addition, I have received nothing to date with regard to same. If you have further questions, please contact Trevor Jiricek or me. 921.96?,qo • • ADVOCATES FOR CONTINUED OPERATION OF CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL APRIL 5, 1993 • PREPARED FOR WELD COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS • 4 FR rr rE 9310614; JOE F. SKELTON & ASSOCIATES, INC. EN*RONMENTAL CONSUL -0G 861 Stove Prairie Rood • Betvue, CO 80512 • Ph, or FAX (303) 482-0113 March 29, 1993 Weld County Commissioners Centennial Center 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Re: Landfill in Weld County Operated by Waste Management Corporation Gentlemen: I have been requested by a group of concerned citizens and landowners to look at the current landfill operated by Waste Management in Weld County. There are a number of factors to be reviewed concerning the ongoing operation of any landfill including but not limited to the following: o Past operating practices. o Present operating practices. o Present Management technical, environmental and standards of practice knowledge. o Financial strengths of owner. o Present Management commitment to complying with environmental regulations, recognized standards of practice to minimize potential environmental contamination and working with local population to meet community standards. o Potential of future environmental contamination. It is my understanding that Waste Management took over the operations of this landfill some years after its opening. The original operators were generally underfinanced and may not have always operate the landfill in accordance with recognized standards of practice and environmental regulations. Having practiced environmental consulting engineering for the last 20 years, specializing in waste management, throughout the U.S., T have a very good knowledge of the waste management industry. Waste Management operates facilities in many parts of the country. They are very well thought of in the industry. They have very knowledgeable personnel in both standards of operating landfills and in complying with environmental regulations. They have shown a commitment to operating their facilities in an environmentally sound manner. They have the financial stability to Weld County cF 931061 Commissioners March 29, 1993 Page 2 address operations as well as controlling potential contamination concerns. Waste Management has also shown a willingness to work with communities to address their concerns. It has been my experience that when a landfill that has environmental problems from past operations is taken over by an experienced, well financed company, the remediati_on of the site while still in operation is handled in a very professional manner. This is accomplished because the company accepted the condition of the site in its economic evaluation prior to taking over the site. Should the site be closed prior to reaching its design capacity, a number of problems will be present. The waste presently being sent to the site will have to be sent elsewhere, at a much higher cost. A new site will have to be developed that may very well develop the same problems as this facility is experiencing. A significant delay will occur in finding a suitable site, locating a qualified operator and permitting a site. A site should not be closed simply because of the "NIMBI" (not in my back yard) syndrome. A site should be required to be operated in compliance with the regulations and by a company with the resources to perform the work. Waste Management Corporation has the technical and financial resources to accomplish these requirements. I would encourage you to work with this firm to solve the problems at the site and not to just close the site. Very truly yours, Joe F, Skelton & Associates, Inc. Joe Skelon, Ph.D., P.E. 1/4'PreSxident row\ JOE F. SKELTON & ASSOCIATES, INC. 931061 • • Subject CENTRAL WELD COUNTY SANITARY LANDFILL. The following is a list of 35 residents and people with vested interest in land within approximately 2 1/2 miles of the CWSL. This list comprises those who do not oppose the continued operation of the CWSL until the end of a reasonable life cycle as long as the operation adheres to all pollution control measures. Louis Spomer Steve Spomer Larry Kammerzell Steve Hayes Mike Hayes David Hayes Kathy Hall Vern Kammerzell Julie Kammerzell Melodie Kammerzell Steve Kammerzell Ella Marie Hayes Art Garcia Susanne Stephens Dee Belo Gene Kammerzell Carol Prewitt Lisa Bell Jan Spomer Julie Spomer Florence Kammerzell Bev Hayes Sherry Hayes Sloane Stephens Randy Hall Carolyn Kammerzell Doug Kammerzell Keith Kammerzell Jennifer Kammerzell Van Hayes Alicia Garcia Jon Stephens Chris Dubbs Jan Kammerzell Jeff Prewitt NOTE: Because of people's work commitments very little time was available to tell the "other side of the story". What motivated us to prepare this package was the disinformation, disregard for other peoples property and sensationalism and radical actions by the Telep-Daniels group. You can see 35 residents and landowners within approximately 2 1/2 miles of CWSL favor the continued operation of the landfill. We urge you again not to be mislead by a small group of neighbors and possibly outsiders opposing the landfill. The list could be longer if time allowed. The above are the ones we had time to contact. 931061 March 31. 1993 Weld County Commissioners Connie Harbert Centennial Center 915 10th Street Greeley, CO. 80631 Dear Mrs. Harbert. I would like to point out at least one totally inaccurate statement in C-COW's flyer distributed in the area last Sunday soliciting support to close the landfill near our farm. In the third paragraph, second sentence it states that local farmers agreed to the siting of the dump. C -COW knows this is an untruth! Local farmers never agreed nor had any say except to object to the landfill. C -COW knows this. Our concern is the degree of dis-information they are distributing to yourselves and the community. This does give rise to what appears to be a credibility gap on the part of C- COW's position in this matter. Yours truly, '42nice-ly Susanne Spomer Stephens 931061 HAVE A CA! BE CONCERNED!! GREEELEY-11011ECEN LANDFILL C Coloradans - Concerned Over a.' Water (C-) is a 5m4) of court -rod G Ti Colorado citizens who demand action b/ their elected representatives to �i protect public health and the environment. x m t 4r >r•ri E 1.4 The Greeley -Milliken landfill is located in a 0R DPADOO. e AREA, 1/2 'a ou ) . 0 mile from the Big Tharp on River and 1 1/2 miles from the South Platte River ''i C y C byre the two rivers neet at Dos Rios. 3 c ..- >r O •.4 tt fl reached 1971, the Evans dump had reachcapacity and the .c G •ti larrlfill x Was proposed. Local farms agreed to siting of the deep because av they were premised it would be only an WIDEN nf, AND ICED CLOSE NOT LATER THAN 1986, when a new site would be in operation. TODAY, 21 Y'1,Rs LATER, the Greeley -Milliken dump is still in operation, GRCWD.G LARGER EACH DAY! The landfill continues, and threatens to EXPAND, even though a large, lined and buffered facility in dry lands is located near Ault and another is planned near veensA g, T1e Greeley -M43. ken landfill is iH ATED BY cCROI.R STANDARIS. Be- cause it was established prior to the adoption of federal RCRA laws and prior to the adoption o2 currant state regulations, the owners/operators have NEVER FILED AN ENGINEERING AND OPERA:IC:NS DESIGN PLAN. The landfill has not been REECCIRED TO COMPLY WITH CSAtRDPT SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL IAWS! When the landfill was begun, it was dug =tow THE Gi CUNDWAT R, was UNLINED, aid TRASH WIS LCKPE) DiI'O STANDING WATER, all in a major drainage area 1/2 mile fray the Big Wraps= River. REMH2 SEER, EVEN lacusEioID WASTES SUCH AS PAIR? CANS, SOLVENTS, CLEANERS AND G R:EN P=I== CAN ENDANGER GRJJO AND SURFACE WA'CR IF PLACED DE UNLINED ECM7S1 The Greeley -Milliken dump has holding ponds on site, which collect water. It also hts deep, dangerous trenches to divert gran dater and surface .run-off. - CONIAMTNATTON I t HEAVY METALS is baing de`.aeted in neighboringL`rigtsot-holding lakes. The heangatrs of these lakes are opened, the water leaves the lakes, goes into the irrigation ditches, finds its way through gravel beds and sloughs and INTO T`E BIG TLTi°5,'Y. AND T1iN Dr10 THE SOUTH FSKI'TS. IF THIS EUMP commons TO GO ONNCTICTD, =Itemisation of Colorado's surface and ground water will result. The state Department of Health, thrash its Solid and Hazaztc*ia Waste Division and the Division of Water Quality lam BE URGED TO INVESTIGATE THE SCURIE OF Tiffs CONTAMINATION! PUBLIC ATTEKTTCYi AND PUBLIC HEARINGS most focus on this facility so that it is closed and any resulting contamination is treated. • FF 931061 7 P. 0. Box 773 Saratoga, Wyoming 82331 307-326-8874 Dear Editor, Over the past few weeks I have watched with interest as charges, counter charges, truths, half truths, innuendos, etc. have been presented through the news media by various individuals and groups regarding the present move to permanently close the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill operated by Waste Services Corporation. My wife and her sister are the owners of the Spomer farm which entirely borders the CWSL on the south and the west. Our family's lands and waters are the ones most directly affected by any past, present or future pollution, erosion and other real or imagined environmental damage. In a letter to the editor, published in the Johnstown Breeze, Mr. Harold Daniels recently raised a question relative to this "garbage mountain" when completed and capped and continued on with a scenario of an inch of rain, three million gallons of runoff, wind and water erosion, garbage exposure and so on. Real scary, but a largely sensation- alized and extremely remote possibility. I think the cartoon of Mt. CWSL paid for by CCOW and accompanying this article bears out this sensationalism. Exaggeration seems to be the name of the game. The stories we heard as kids comes to mind -Chicken Little and The Sky is Falling and The Boy Who Cried Wolf. Yes, these things could happen, but the possibility with today's knowledge and technology reduces the incidence of tfln e types of happenings to the minimum. Seedings can be successful on steep slopes and under arid conditions. The development of netting, slurry mix seeding and mulching, and residue incorporation are a few of the methods successfully used on steep slopes and dry areas where rainfall is in the 5-9" range and winds are extreme. Yes, Mother Nature needs to help, but the incidence of success has been good in harsh environmental areas and we are continually developing new techniques. Mixtures utilizing adaptable native seed from plants and grasses found and presently growing under like conditions are also available. As a retired professional conservationist of more than 30 years with the U.S. Soil Conservation Service, I have helped plan and apply these types of measures to the land. • • Early last week my wife and I made a tour of the landfill so we might be better informed as to the operation. We were impressed with the lack of visible refuse. The dump area being used on that particular day was smaller in over all sire than I have seen exposed in my community's landfill, town size 3,000 plus or minus. Much of the area was relatively level but undulating. Some of the area has vegetative growth on it where it has been seeded. This in itself would tend to dispel the myth that "no vegetation could survive." Colorado law requires, at this time, only a two foot cover on closing a landfill. Waste Service's standard practice is to cover with two feet of compacted clay with an additional six inches of topsoil, into which they seed a pasture mix. The soil is protected from wind and water erosion by a straw mulch until enough growth is obtained to protect and hold the soil in place. In addition, they build in a slope to reduce standing water infiltration to a minimum. In my professional opinion this is the way to go and is several steps beyond what the law requires. At the present time there are several areas within the landfill that are not at the target level as I understood it twenty plus years ago. To successfully complete and cap the landfill these would need to be filled and then an additional amount of fill would be needed to build a slope before final capping and seeding. We do not feel that allowing the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill to continue operation will cause any more harm to our land and water than has already occurred over the past twenty ycsrs. We also feel that by working with waste Services over the past several months, and by not taking an adversarial position, we have a much greater chance of taking care of any existing or future problems that may develop. Waste Services is providing a needed and vital service to the community. Are we going to allow a small vocal group to make a decision for the rest of us that is based on what I said at the start of this letter, charges, counter charges, truths, half truths, innuendos, and now this last Sunday, outright scare tactics? Sincerely, Van Hayes 931061 q LETTER TO THE EDITOR Not Needed, Not in Compliance, Not Safe, and Not Wanted! This is what a small number of people calling themselves the Ashton -Daniels Community Action Group have concluded about the Weld Central Landfill between Milliken and Greeley. Action Group spokesman Michael Hays claims. Waste Management the landfill owner and operator is nothing more than 'GREEDY.' Harold Daniel, group member, predicts a seventy-five foot mountain of trash being eroded by the elements. They and their followers have gone on a crusade to close the landfill...TODAY! In doing so, this group has twisted facts out of proon, thepviewsnofstheaentirelsed the community,tandlmisledmisrepresented the public. From just below the landfill at the Spomer Stables come some real facts and another opinion. Fact #1. Waste Management purchased the Weld Central Landfill in 1991, twenty years after the landfills inception. Fact #2. Waste Management has spent in the realm of $3/4 Million to analyze to what extent the landfill is effecting our environment. Fact #3. Waste Management has already committed $1/2 Million to the process of correcting problems at the landfill they inherited. 'WAKE UP' Ashton -Daniels Community Action Group! IS THAT GREED? Whose trash are we dealing with anyway? It's yours and mine. Now we have a 'Corporate Giant' with its checkbook out, willing to cleanup what was created twenty years ago and you're trying to run them off. I use the landfill as do most of you. So do many others in this area of Weld County. Our option if this landfill is closed and we choose not to dump our trash along fields and roads is at best twenty-five miles away. This landfill is 'convenient' and it is 'needed'! 'Not Wanted'...I'll give this one to the Ashton -Daniels Group. I prefer not living next to a landfill. Yellowstone Park would be much better. Fact is, twenty some years ago when this landfill site was chosen, our predecessors weren't able to thwart off the chosing of this site. .Our lawyer was all but ignored. Harold and Madoline Daniels weren't even present. Guy Shable offered to trade this wet site for dryland and was shrugged off. Even our County Attorney, Sam Telep, Michael Hays' Father -in -Law, whose family owns land north of the site chose to hide behind the old 'Conflict of Interest' cliche. Fact is, everyone complaining now should have 931061 /O • • complained then. Fact is, we have a landfill. As for 'Not Safe' and 'Not in Compliance', Waste Management has committed its manpower, equipment, and capital to achieve these goals. By October 1993, Waste Management has to be in compliance with the new, strict, Subtitle D Regulations and has to clean our environment and keep it clean if they plan to operate at this site. This landfill is one of the cleanest landfills I have seen and is professionally managed. This site if closed properly, will not be a seventy-five foot mountain of eroding trash, but rolling hills, thirty to fourty feet at the drest, seeded with dryland grasses and designed to shed water off the site and not soak into the ground water through the trash. My goal, as should be the entire community, is work with, not fight with Waste Management to insure the future. Awareness is only a stepping stone in the process. The Ashton -Daniels Group has accomplished awareness. Now its time to support Waste Management's efforts and accomplish the goal to clean our environment and eventually close the landfill properly and sensably after its useful lifespan. David Hayes Spomer Stables 931061 /i • • Letter to the Editor Now for a more logical look at the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill situation. The most logical solution is for Waste Management to guide the landfill in its completion. That company has the experience and the capability to manage the landfill in a professional manner that will realize the landfill's; full potential and not curtail the effort begun in 1971. The landfill was supposed to close earlier but that would be a wasteful action as its filling is not yet complete. Mother landfill would just have to be created somewhere as the alternative to the Alt and Keensburg's dumps as they fill up faster with Weld County's added trash. The pro -environment decision is to utilize one developed landfill before wasting more land on others in the future. An added incentive is that the landfill is now in more capable hands. Yes, writing as a neighbor of the landfill, its never having bear begun would be the ideal situation but it is now a reality due to the previous decisions of the county commissioners and open knowledge of the public. An irrational treatment of the landfill would be its immediate closing. Superfuud will not whisk in with a magic wand to clean up the landfill. Superfund only deals with toxic wage clean up. The landfill does not have this required element according to a member of Superfund which is probably much to the chagrin of the anti -landfill contingent since that makes their puerile mock. graveyard, that they have set up in protest of the landfill, null and void. Members of the anti -landfill group also lack a consistency in their beliefs. One of the most vocal of this anti -landfill group is a man who served as the county attorney when the original deal was approved. He gave his full support at that time as a county officer and as a neighbor to the dump. Now, apparently because of some hidden agenda, he has had a change of heart.. This rather radical contingent professes to he on the side of die environment and has gained sour support by means of a petition against the landfill. This is a noble cause but not when the cry masks the facts behind the situation. Anyone should be willing to sign a petition in support of their environment but those signers should make themselves aware of what effects the closing would have on other neighborhoods as they become potcniiul landfill sites as well the premature filling of the Alt and Keensburg landfills. The only rational option 'in this situation is to allow Waste Management to guide the landfill in its completion and for the radical, irrational contingent to lay their vacant dead to rest. Sloane Stephens Concerned, Next Generation Land -Owner 1406 Stove Prairie Rd Bellvue Co E0512 (303) 482-2719 ft 931061 �a_ S F.2'3 March 29, 1993 200 Oakridge Trail Kennedale, TX 76060 Weld County/Board of County Commissioners Centennial Center 915 10th Street Greeley. CO 80631 Dear Commissioners: This letter is in reference to my position on the disposition of Central Weld County landfill. I feel justified in expressing my position for the landfill's continued operation due to my strong ties to the area, and the four generations of my family that have called the Spomer farm home. This property is immediately adjacent to the landfill. Unlike many of the activist campaigning to close the landfill whose experience with the facility spans weeks or even months, I and my family have lived in intimate contact with the landfill from its inception approximately 21 years ago. The recent change in the landfill management to Waste Management Inc. should be viewed as a very positive event for Weld County and the landfill by all parties. My personal experience with Waste Management at the local government level have shown the company to be extremely professional in dealing with the environmental, technical and public issues associated with the management and disposal of solid waste. Waste Management has recently been awarded the local garbage hauling contract, have, completed fabricating a recycling center for curbside programs and have provided a significant contribution towards public education in this area. The presence of a landfill in close proximity to one's home is never a positive thing. However, separating the emotional from the factual issues is essential when making decisions effecting the future of this and similar landfills. Rational, responsible citizens must acknowledge that • Landfills are a fact of life. ▪ No one wants a landfill close to their home. • Properly managed landfills provide the most economical solution to our solid waste disposal needs. • Locating landfills as close to the waste source reduces cost (transportation, labor and road maintenance) • The Central Weld County landfill Is currently in operation, continued operation will not create a new monetary hardship on area properties (property values will not be affected). • Ground water pollution associated with the landfill will not disappear if the landfill were closed. 931061 /3 L L) R F�.R�I'13 • • P.3/3 • Waste Management Inc. has the expertise and resources not only to control future pollution, but to Improve the environmental damage leftover from previous landfill operators. I have confidence that sound judgement will prevail when you, the Commissioners of Weld County must differentiate between reality and fantasy, and facts and emotion and that the taxpayers of Weld County will be provided the opportunity to enjoy the advantages of a professionally operated, economical source for solid waste disposal. Respectfully, Steven V, Hayes 931061 ,,f March 29, 1993 Mr. John Pickle Department of Health 1517 - 16 Avenue Court Greeley, Colorado 80631 Dear Mr. Pickle, We are directing this letter to you because we understand the hearing process will heavily rely on information provided by yourself, supported by State Health agencies. Your recommendations and those of the other health officials will probably decide the fate of the CWSL continued operation. We feel confident the health agencies' expert testimony will not fall victim to radical elements in their recommendations as to the future of the Central Weld County Sanitary Landfill. We went to see Mrs. Daniels recently to hear her views and to express our views and concerns. We found this to be anexercise in futility. With her mind set, everything we tried to discuss was impossible. As she will now say that our land sale has bought us off, she was saying then that the health officials. County and State have been bought off by Waste Services/Waste Management. Mrs. Daniels should open her prespective and realize we are fortunate to have Waste Services/Waste Management to run the landfill. Our position: 1. We consulted an independent environmental engineering company. They recommend Waste Services/Waste Management continued operation is the best for our property and the environment. They have written to the County Commissioners regarding their findings. 2. Having Waste Services/Waste Management there with a financial incentive to correct whatever pollution problems we might have will prove more expedient than shutting them down. 3. We also feel and have been advised that the question about the continued use of the landfill until the end of its useful cycle is the only 931061 i.s- • • intelligent and rational use of an asset. The damage has already been done. Closing it now is not a practical answer to the problem. 4. Waste Services/Waste Management has the financial and technical capabilities to address the problems as they arise concerning pollution problems. 5. Yes, we have entered into a contract to sell Waste Services/Waste Management a ribbon buffer around the landfill. Contrary to Mrs. Daniels contention this is NOT the "missing link", money was not our major consideration. Past landfill operators dumped waste right up to their fence line which now does not allow room to correct current pollution and drainage problems. We already allow them to drill test holes on our property in the spirit of cooperation. It is important to us is to see an atmosphere of cooperation develop among all of us involved to insure everything is done to identify and clean up all contamination between now and when the landfill's capacity is reached and dosed. 6. The fact remains that we will continue to be landowners with one mile of a common property line with the landfill. We will remain concerned neighbors. Mrs. Daniels fails to understand that we did not sell out, move out and give up ownership of a farm that remains the most impacted by the CWSL. We strongly urge you to not fall victim to this radical group. Within 2 to 3 miles of the landfill, the majority of the residents and landowners do not oppose the continued operation of the landfill until the end of its useful cycle. Yours truly. maA41,4erii", #dur „lanzi.., Ella Marie Spomer Hayes Susanne Spomer Stephens CC: Patrica Nolan, M.D. Executive Director, Colorado Department of Health Weld County Commissioners Lee Morrison, Weld County Assistant County Attorney Randolph L. Gordon, M.D., M.P.H., Director, Weld County Health Dept. Chuck Cunliffe, Weld County Planning Department Roger Doak, Colorado Department of Health Barbara Taylor, Water Quality Control Division, Colorado Dept. of Health Joyce Williams, Colorado Department of Health 931061 /Z, • • March 29. 1993 Weld County Commissioners Centennial Center 915 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Dear Commissioners: Again, as the landowners of the property directly south and west of the Central Weld Sanitary Landifll, we again write to you. After reading further newspaper releases by the Telep/Daniels Group and dealing with their activities on our property, we have done the following to become better informed of the true reality of the landfill situation. I. We have contacted State Health Department individuals as to the state of the pollution especially concerning the Spomer lakes. 2. We have contacted a private environmental consultant. 3. We have held meetings with personnel of the Waste Services/Waste Management as to their plans for operating and properly closing the landfill, 4. We have received information on operations of Waste Services/Waste Management in other areas of the United States. Again our position is this, Waste Services/Waste Management did not create the problems addressed by the Telep/Daniels group nor those issues brought forward by the County and State. It is our position : 1. that Waste Services/Waste Management is the best answer to solve the above issues. We believe Waste Services/Waste Management is acting in good faith to correct these issues. 2. that the landfill has never been so well operated than under Waste Services/Waste Management and that they are the first operator to have both the financial and professional expertise to correct the areas of concern of the State and County. �� 931061 /7 3, that as a national company. Waste Services/Waste Management has a reputation to maintain with its share holders and the general public and are striving to be on the cutting edge of latest advancements of landfill techniques. Having a mega -million dollar company operating the landfill to us is an asset not a detriment as the Telep/Daniels group implies. 4. that it is better to have the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill being actively operated than inactive with minimum attention being given to past problems. 5. that it serves no purpose to close the landfill before it is filled. The damage has already been done and with new State and Federal regulations and new advancements in landfill methods further damage should not happen. With the County and State Agencies and Waste Services/Waste Management all cooperating together, the Central Weld Sanitary landfill can become a state-of-the-art landfill serving the citizens of Central Weld County and the environment. Yours truly, Ella Marie Spomer Hayes �a'o7) - S'89$' Susanne Spomer Stephens 1/42 - -2 7/i 931061 /q RO4 MOUNTAIN LAZY BAR WNCH (303) 482-2719 March 26, 1993 Weld County Commissioners Connie Harbert, Chairwoman Centennial Center 915 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Dear Commissioners: Ref: Who really wants to see the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill closed? The silent majority is unfortunately just that, SILENT. The trouble makers and radicals seem to always receive attention and press coverage. Within approximately 2 miles of the landfill, something like 27 people who live or have property interest are AGAINST CLOSING THE LANDFILL. The local community sentiments seem to be, it is better to have a properly operated landfill, run by financially and professionally qualified people than to have a half used landfill, forcing those who legally dump trash to travel much, much further to do so and having trash dumped along our county roads by others. Remember when listening to the small number of radical protesters, it is in vogue for people to sign petitions against landfills, and against big business regardless if it is in the best interest of the county or environment. Please cooperate with Waste Services/Waste Management to properly close the landfill at the end of the normal cycle. Very truly yours. Jon T. Stephens Rocky Mountain Lazy J -S Ranch owner Mailing Address; Scaffold Gulch Ranch 1406 Stove Praise Road 8ellvue, Colorado 80512 Other Locations: 23673 Weld County Road 27'1 Milliken, Colorado 80543 3756 West County Road 16 Loveland Colorado 80537 931061 • • Box 1399 Saratoga, Wyoming 82331 March 26, 1993 Greeley Tribune 501 8th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80632 Dear Editor: Wouldn't it be great if Weld County citizens could reuse all their garbage or if there were some magic button they could push to make it useful again over night? The fact is, Weld County cannot afford to sit around and wait for such dreams to come true. No one likes living with landfills, but we can't do without them. The trash is here. The trash will not disappear. We must deal with it. We cannot become part of the NIMBI' (Not - in -my -backyard) crowd. The Telep/Daniels group crusading to close the Central Weld Landfill has concentrated on environmental concerns. They have accumulated a file of information, but much is focused on sensational, isolated facts and figures. So many partial truths and rumors have been circulated, it has become a circus. The Action Group has accomplished their stated goals including: to be granted a public hearing to have an opportunity to be heard and to have testing of groundwater and wells surrounding the CWL. They also state "Frankly the types of remediation are fairly simple: The contaminants can be captured and then pumped to a treatment area and then released or the contaminants can be dug up and removed from the landfill." Now isn't it time to allow the professionals to do their part? Let us give Waste Services/Waste Management time to finish the job they have already started and have committed thousands of dollars more for continued remediation. If you are ill, do you listen to the opinions of family and friends and stop there, or do you seek the advice of your doctor and specialists? Is Weld County going to base such a wide reaching decision as the fate of Central Weld Landfill on what a group of homemakers, lawyers, pilots, and other novices say, or will the county listen to professionals and specialists in the business - Waste Services/Waste Management, Colorado Department of Health specialists, and Weld County Health Department personel? 931061 ) v • • March 26, 1993 Page 2 I join my family in wanting to see an intelligent decision reached regarding the Central Weld Landfill adjoining our Spomer family farm. Please don't let emotional frenzy and political pressure alone determine the outcome. Yours truly; 7 ,fir K therine S. Hall (307) 326-5873 CC: Connie Harbert -Chairwoman, Weld County Commissioners John Pickle, Weld County Department of Health Randolph L. Gordon, M.A., M.P.H., Director, Weld County Health Department ' Lee Morrison, Weld County Assistant Attorney Chuck Cunliffe, Weld County Planning Department Roger Doak, Colorado Department of Health Patricia Nolan, M.D., Executive Director, Colorado Department of Health Barbara Taylor, Water Quality Control Division, Colorado Department of Health Johnstown Breeze Loveland Daily Reporter -Herald G/= 931%1 • • 5026 Redmond Road Cheyenne, Wyoming 82009 March 26, 1993 Greeley Tribune 501 8th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80632 Dear Editor: I have been reading negative press releases about Central Weld Landfill. I don't like landfills either, but they are a necessary part of the American system. Our garbage -creating lifestyle is not going to go away overnight. The Central Weld Landfill has become a widely publicized issue. A well -organized opposition group has created sensational headlines, but there is more than one side to every story. My family objected to the landfill in 1971 when it was proposed, but their concerns were ignored and over -ridden. The damage was done long ago. Closing the landfill will not make it disappear. My family had plans to build on a site adjacent to the present land -fill boundary, but were forced to consider alternate home-building plans after 1971. They regret their lack of foresight at that time, when they did not urge county officials to see that verbal pledges and agreements be put into a written contract to ensure future compliance with the "so -called -promises," "mutually -agreed -upon -arrangements," and Federal, state, and county regulations. Although my family did not want to see a landfill bordering their farm in 1971, we cannot blame Waste Services -Waste Management for the negligence of others in the past. Waste Services/Waste Management is now working at solving many of the problems. Most of the less desirable aspects of the landfill, as with any landfill, really affect only the handful of neighboring land -owners. Thousands of other Weld County residents have not been heard from. Are they willing to pay higher garbage -collection fees to cover the added transportation costs to other sites, give up the convenience of quick Saturday trips to Central Weld Landfill, or pay the added taxes to repair increased miles of highway wear and tear? /'r 931061 c Page 2 March 26, 1993 I think it is time to look at the overall picture and weigh both sides of the issue. If the Central Weld Landfill is closed, the hidden costs to all of Weld County's citizens will far outweigh any negative aspects that mainly involve the handful of adjacent landowners. Yours truly, Michael Hayes (307) 632-2908 CC: Connie Harbert -Chairwoman, Weld County Commissioners John Pickle, Weld County Department of Health Lee Morrison, Weld County Assistant Attorney Randolph L. Gordon, M.D., M.P.H., Director, Weld County Health Department Chuck Cunliffe, Weld County Planning Department Roger Doak, Colorado Department of Health Patricia Nolan, M.D., Executive Director, Colorado Department of Health Barbara Taylor, Water Quality Control Division, Colorado Department of Health Johnstown Breeze Loveland Daily Reporter -Herald 931061 3 • • March 23, 1993 Mr. Dale Hall Weld County Commissioner Centennial Center 915 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Dear Mr. Webster. I read with great interest the March 22nd article in the Reporter -Herald concerning the Central Weld Landfill. In particular the comments of Sharon Schmidt about her well water. With some research, she would discover that the well water in that area has never been drinkable because of the hardness of the water. My father drilled our well in the late 1920's or early 1930's. The water was used for garden purposes and livestock. As a child growing up, you were in big trouble with Mother if you got the well water on the windows because it left spots on the window because of the hardness. Before water lines were run to the farmsteads, we bad cisterns and we trucked our water to the farm. I remember Dan the Waterman who delivered to our farm. Before Dan the Waterman we had a water tank and would useithe farm truck to haul water from Greeley. We never had the technical, chemical anaylsis of the water in those days but this we did know, we did not use it for household use. In modern times, we do not use the well water in automatic horse waterers because the mineral content clogs them. I think no taxpayer should be liable for homeowners use of distilled water as Sharon Schmidt states. I write to you because of my conern of so much information being given by the environmental groups that is unfounded. Yours truly, ,ztanr_c_ y1.1 -X77 331061 Landfill. issues lbw. • Having read I $ Spatter sister's March 16 letter and being the ownetpf land adjacent to rho 1rodf,11, I, too, have the same cOucems abeut the landfill 7bo pubic= we ate now seeing me the same problems and ceramists that the Garcia • and Spratter families bad when we opposed the opening of the landfill tack in 1971. • I have met with Wan Services/Wan Management to dismal my concerns about • the water quality, and feel they are deducted to conecting the problems which they took upon themselves when they purchased the operation in 1991. They have been the best opastara ice its conception. Living mart to the Weill has ban 26,14 at best, but the fact remains that the garbage accumulation ova the last 21 years is not going away. We need a company with the wilt ability. and financial capability to man- afro and eveamally close the Landfill in the most eovimomenta ly mound m man. With the Weld County, the shoe, Waste Services/Waste Management and the come malty cooperating together, continuing to operate and that closing the landfill through its planned We cycle appears to be the best' sohmonia oar emvisoomalt. .. Artier. Omit Milliken Printed in Greeley Tribune March 24, 1993 edition Page 8 FF 931061 a� • LOUIS E. SPOMER OIL AN0 GAS PROPERTIES • TELEPHONE AREA CODE (303) 757.7442 March 24, 1993 Weld County Commssioners Centennial Center 915 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Re: County Landfill 4055 SOUTH ONEIDA STREET DENVER. COLORADO 80237 Gent4dmen, We shouldn't let a handful of people cause the County Commissioners to make another environmental mistake in the future of the Central Weld County Landfill, located east of Milliken. The first handful of people coused the Commissioners to allow the opening of the landfill in 1971. The second handful of people are trying to force the Commissioners to prematurely close the Landfill. Ztdoes not serve the community nor the enviroment by the radical actions proposed by these people. The damage caused by the first handful of people cannot be reversed by the second handfull of people's wishful thinking! The fact is; the landfill is there to stay; active or inactive. The far sighted course, for the Commissioners to follow, to best serve the community and the enviroment, is to cooperate with the current operators of the landfill to insure an environmentally safe, normal closing of the landfill at the end of its useful cycle. Very Try,' yours, outs E."Spomer Concerned Landowner 931061 '? o March 10, 1993 Greeley Tribune 501 8th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80632 Dear Editor, • COSY We have read the articles pertaining to the Central Weld Landfill with great interest. As the only landowners with bordering property below the landfill, we are quite concerned with future developments regarding the fate of the landfill. We would like to point out that Waste Services/Waste. Management did not ante the problem. They took over an existing dilemma that dates back to 1971. The problem has developed because of lack of monitoring by county officials. It appears that Waste Services/Waste Management is working to correct the situation. Their company has both the resources and the technical insight to carry out the solution. If Weld County officials close the landfill, will Weld County be responsible for cleaning up any pollution and contamination in perpetuity? We can't just wish or complain this situation away. In reviewing the history of events since 1971. the main impression that emerges is: "Where have Weld County officials been for all these years?" In 1971 they ignored the request and concern of neighboring landowners to not allow the landfill because of the water table, the seepage in the draw adjacent to the site and the proximity to the Big Thompson river. Not only did they override the request, but it appears those same officials were negligent from the very beginning in setting up proper guidelines and written agreements to protect Weld County citizens. Throughout the period of 1971 to 1992, it also appears the Weld County officials did little monitoring of the situation, until a public outcry in 1992 brought a sudden flurry of activity. 931061 It does seem that theSdfill issue might be best served the county officials cooperating with Waste Services/Waste Management. who has the expertise, resources and ability to eliminate existing and future problems. Very truly yours, Ella Marie Spomer Hayes Susanne Spomer Stephens CC: John Pickle, Weld County Department of Health Lee Morrison, Weld County Assistant County Attorney Randolph L. Gordon, MD.. M.P.H., Director, Weld County Health Dept. Chuck Cunliffe, Weld County Planning Department Roger Doak, Colorado Department of Health Barbara Taylor. Water Quality Control Division Colorado Dept. of Health Joyce Williams, Department of Health Environmental Compliance Officer 9::1961 '.3 • March 10, 1993 Weld County Commissioners Centennial Center 915 10th Street Greeley, CO. 80631 Dear Commissioners: COPY We are owners of the property directly south and west of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. We have recently received a notice from Chuck Cunliffe of the Weld County Planning Department that you intend to hold a public hearing on the landfill. on April S. 1993. Prior to this notice, we have not been contacted by anyone at the county or the media regarding our knowledge of the current situation or the activities at the landfill for the past 20 years. Our property is the only bordering property which is below the landfill. We were not in favor of placing this facility uphill of us in 1971 when the Board of Commissioners approved the location. Nevertheless, we have had to deal with it in the best manner possible throughout these past 21 years and must continue to do so... In July 1992, the current operators informed us they had recently expanded their testing of the groundwater and discovered some contamination along the common borders of our property. Naturally, we were very concerned about this discovery they had made. However, since that time, we have been pleased to see the progress and commitment Waste Services/Waste Management has demonstrated toward resolving this situation. Our family has owned this property next to the landfill for many, many years and would like to continue to own this property. We are trying to work with the landfill operators to allow them a reasonable amount of land around the facility to do the right thing. Even if they acquire this additional property, we will still be the only property owners directly in the path of groundwater contamination. We, and you, must not jeopardize the community's best option to clean up and eventually close this facility properly. If you force the premature closure of the landfill, you are placing our property at risk for greater long range environmental damage. Please don't jeopardize the community's best solution. 931061 cQ • Weld County Commissioners Centennial Center March 10, 1993 Page Two Negative community opinion and pressure will not solve the only real issue: environmental impact to us in the future. We can't just wish or complain this situation away. This approach is not productive and only stands to hurt Weld County and our environment. Let's focus on taking advantage of their expertise to correct any past problems. We urge you to give Waste Services/Waste Management a chance to continue their professional approach to operating, clean-up and proper closure of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Any other action will place our property in jeopardy. Very truly yours, >2744‘L rnor- 0 `3v7.7 3.G _ f87•/ Ella Marie Spomer Hayes ert.teir-c. 1/7pyr,,L..r Susanne Spomer Stephens 99x--2717 CC John Pickle, Weld County Department of Health Lee Morrison, Weld County Assistant County Attorney Randolph L. Gordon. M.D., M.P.H., Director. Weld County Health Dept. Chuck Cunliffe, Weld County Planning Department Roger Doak, Colorado Department of Health Barbara 'Taylor. Water Quality Control Division Colorado Dept. of Health Joyce Williams, Department of Health Environmental Compliance Officer 931061 7C i 0 March 29, 1993 Weld County Commissioners Centennial Center 915 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Dear Commissioners: Again, as the landowners of the property directly south and west of the Central Weld Sanitary Landifll , we again write to you. After reading further newspaper releases by the Telep/Daniels Group and dealing with their activities on our property, we have done the following to become better informed of the true reality of the landfill situation. 1. We have contacted State Health Department individuals as to the state of the pollution especially concerning the Spomer lakes. 2. We have contacted a private environmental consultant. 3. We have held meetings with personnel of the Waste Services/Waste Management as to their plans for operating and properly closing the landfill. 4. We have received information on operations of Waste Services/Waste Management in other areas of the United States. Again our position is this, Waste Services/Waste Management did not create the problems addressed by the Telep/Daniels group nor those issues brought forward by the County and State. It is our position : 1. that Waste Services/Waste Management is the best answer to solve the above issues. We believe Waste Services/Waste Management is acting in good faith to correct these issues. 2. that the landfill has never been so well operated than under Waste Services/Waste Management and that they are the first operator to have both the financial and professional expertise to correct the areas of concern of the State and County. aXhcYu'f EE Cc: f/L, /2L1 /Q4 Secs 931061 / 3. that as a national company. Waste Services/Waste Management has a reputation to maintain with its share holders and the general public and are striving to be on the cutting edge of latest advancements of landfill techniques. Having a mega -million dollar company operating the landfill to us is an asset not a detriment as the Telep/Daniels group implies. 4. that it is better to have the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill being actively operated than inactive with minimum attention being given to past problems. 5. that it serves no purpose to close the landfill before it is filled. The damage has already been done and with new State and Federal regulations and new advancements in landfill methods further damage should not happen. With the County and State Agencies and Waste Services/Waste Management all cooperating together. the Central Weld Sanitary landfill can become a state-of-the-art landfill serving the citizens of Central Weld County and the environment, Yours truly. Ella Marie Spomer Hayes � 07) 3a 6 - g871/ Susanne Spomer Stephens %i1 931061 ROCGMOUNTAIN LAZY BAR SNCH (303) 482-2719 March 26, 1993 Weld County Commissioners Connie Harbert, Chairwoman Centennial Center 915 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Dear Commissioners: Ref: Who really wants to see the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill closed? The silent majority is unfortunately just that, SILENT, The trouble makers and radicals seem to always receive attention and press coverage. Within approximately 2 miles of the landfill, something like 27 people who live or have property interest ace AGAINST CLOSING THE LANDFILL. The local community sentiments seem to be, it is better to have a properly operated landfill, run by financially and professionally qualified people than to have a half used landfill, forcing those who legally dump trash to travel much, much further to do so and having trash dumped along our county roads by others. Remember when listening to the small number of radical protesters, it is in vogue for people to sign petitions against landfills, and against big business regardless if it is in the best interest of the county or environment. Please cooperate with Waste Services/Waste Management to properly close the landfill at the end of the normal cycle. Very t ly yours, Jo St hens Rocky Mountain Lazy J -S Ranch Owner Mailing Address: Scaffold Gulch Ranch 1406 Stove Prairie Road Bellvue. Colorado 805 i2 Other Locations: 23673 Weld County Road 27'/ Miihken, Colorado 80543 r9 3756 West C64a61 Loveland. Colorado 80537 gitlubii+ DI) Cc' <, rl N+ />/, JCS. SKELTON & ASSOCIATESI C. ENrriRONMENTAL CONSUL - MG 861 Stove ProIr a Rood • BeIlvcio, CO 80512 • Ph, or FAX (303; 4 2:0*1 T C March 29, 1993 weld County Commissioners Centennial Center 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 ;Y " E9 Re: Landfill in Weld County Operated by Waste Management Corporation Gentlemen: I have been requested by a group of concerned citizens and landowners to look at the current landfill operated by Waste Management in Weld County. There are a number of factors to be reviewed concerning the ongoing operation of any landfill including but not limited to the following: o Past operating practices. o Present: operating practices. o Present: Management technical, environmental and standards of practice knowledge. o Financial strengths of owner. o Present: Management commitment to complying with environmental regulations, recognized standards of practice to minimize potential environmental contamination and working with local population to meet community standards. o Potential of future environmental contamination. It is my understanding that Waste Management took over the operations of this landfill some years after its opening. The original operators were generally underfinanced and may not have always operate the landfill in accordance with recognized standards of practice and environmental regulations. Having practiced environmental consulting engineering for the last 20 years, specializing in waste management, throughout the U.S., I have a very good knowledge of the waste management industry. Waste Management operates facilities in many parts of the country. They are very well thought of in the industry. They have very knowledgeable personnel in both standards of operating landfills and in complying with environmental regulations. They have shown a commitment to operating their facilities in an environmentally sound manner. They have the financial stability to Weld County 931Q61, cc It1 i/cSvcs, /'L, litile Commissioners March 29, 1993 Page 2 address operations as well as controlling potentialcontamination concerns. Waste Management has also shown a willingness to work with communities to address their concerns. It has been my experience that when a landfill that has environmental problems from past operations is taken over by an experienced, well financed company, the remediation of the site while still in operation is handled in a very professional manner. This is accomplished because the company accepted the condition of the site in its economic evaluation prior to taking over the site. Should the site be closed prior to reaching its design capacity, a number of problems will be present. The waste presently being sent to the site will have to be sent elsewhere, at a much higher cost. A new site will have to be developed that may very well develop the same problems as this facility is experiencing. A significant delay will occur in finding a suitable site, locating a qualified operator and permitting a site. A site should not be closed simply because of the "NIMBY" (not in my back yard) syndrome. A site should be required to be operated in compliance with the regulations and by a company with the resources to perform the work. Waste Management Corporation has the technical and financial resources to accomplish these requirements. I would encourage you to work with this firm to solve the problems at the site and not to just close the site. very truly yours, Joe FSkelton &ifociates, Inc. lie: Toe F. elton, Ph.D., P.E. i%presi t JOE F. SKELTON & ASSOCIATES, INC. CC 931061 a, • S March 29. 1993 19 Mr. John Pickle Department of Health 1517 - 16 Avenue Court Greeley. Colorado 80631 Dear Mr. Pickle, We are directing this letter to you because we understand the hearing process will heavily rely on information provided by yourself, supported by State Health agencies. Your recommendations and those of the other health officials will probably decide the fate of the CWSL continued operation. We feel confident the health agencies' expert testimony will not fall victim to radical elements in their recommendations as to the future of the Central Weld County Sanitary Landfill. We went to see Mrs. Daniels recently to hear her views and to express our views and concerns. We found this to be an exercise in futility. With her mind set, everything we tried to discuss was impossible. As she will now say that our land sale has bought us off, she was saying then that the health officials. County and State have been bought off by Waste Services/Waste Management. Mrs. Daniels should open her prespective and realize we are fortunate to have Waste Services/Waste Management to run the landfill. Our position: 1, We consulted an independent environmental engineering company. They recommend Waste Services/Waste Management continued operation is the best for our property and the environment. They have written to the County Commissioners regarding their findings. 2. Having Waste Services/Waste Management there with a financial incentive to correct whatever pollution problems we might have will prove more expedient than shutting them down. 3. We also feel and have been advised that the question about the continued use of the landfill until the end of its useful cycle is the only 93106:1 g_xitcly:-F 88 ccc (c Svcs, , 44,171 l • S intelligent and rational use of an asset. The damage has already been done. Closing it now is not a practical answer to the problem. 4. Waste Services/Waste Management has the financial and technical capabilities to address the problems as they arise concerning pollution problems. 5. Yes, we have entered into a contract to sell Waste Services/Waste Management a ribbon buffer around the landfill. Contrary to Mrs. Daniels contention this is NOT the "missing link", money was not our major consideration. Past landfill operators dumped waste right up to their fence line which now does not allow room to correct current pollution and drainage problems. We already allow them to drill test holes on our property in the spirit of cooperation. It is important to us is to see an atmosphere of cooperation develop among all of us involved to insure everything is done to identify and clean up all contamination between now and when the landfills capacity is reached and closed. 6. The fact remains that we will continue to be landowners with one mile of a common property line with the landfill. We will remain concerned neighbors. Mrs. Daniels fails to understand that we did not sell out, move out and give up ownership of a farm that remains the most impacted by the CWSL. We strongly urge you to not fall victim to this radical group. Within 2 to 3 miles of the landfill. the majority of the residents and landowners do not oppose the continued operation of the landfill until the end of its useful cycle. Yours truly, . 4,14 Mail; t 44.744"' 41'1" 714 -4 -1 -7c -n4-- "frratti lcd'j Ella Marie Spomer Hayes Susanne Spomer Stephens CC Pau•ica Nolan, M.D. Executive Director. Colorado Department of Health Weld County Commissioners Lee Morrison, Weld County Assistant County Attorney Randolph L. Gordon, M.D., M.P.H., Director, Weld County Health Dept. Chuck Cunliffe, Weld County Planning Department Roger Doak, Colorado Department of Health Barbara Taylor, Water Quality Control Division, Colorado Dept. of Health Joyce Williams, Colorado Department of Health 931061 1RCS INC. March 29, 1993 47'81 \ is't 58tfi A�nue Arvada, Colorado 80002-7009 (303) 4'2.9:2221 • FAX (303) 429-0051 Board of Weld County Commissioners 915 Tenth St. P.O. Box 758 Greeley, CO 80632 RE: Central Weld Sanitary Landfill To Whom It May Concern: TARCO, Inc., has projects from time to time, in the Weld/Larimer County areas, and we have a necessity to dispose of construction debris. The Central Weld Sanitary Landfill is centrally located and we would hope that the Board of County Commissioners would grant the right to Waste Services Corporation to continue to operate the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Sincerely, 7� /Get (1/G~, Victor C. Thomas Chairman of the Board VT/jlv P.O. 80X 1047 • ARVADA. COLORADO 80001-1047 An Equal Opportunity Employer cif 1;11;4- A -n- 9`1061 fac, r'/lam Ce.• alS'vc 3, /9L, H/-, • 4$ 1 March 26, 1993 Greeley Tribune 501 8th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80632 Dear Editor: Wouldn't it be great if Weld County citizens could reuse all their garbage or if there were some magic button they could push to make it useful again over night? The fact is, Weld County cannot afford to sit around and wait for such dreams to come true. No one likes living with landfills, but we can't do without them. The trash is here. 'The trash will not disappear. We must deal with it. We cannot become part of the NIMBI (Not - in -my -backyard) crowd. The Telep/Daniels group crusading to close the Central Weld Landfill has concentrated on environmental concerns. They have accumulated a file of information, but much is focused on sensational, isolated facts and figures. So many partial truths and rumors have been circulated, it has become a circus. The Action Group has accomplished their stated goals including: to be granted a public hearing to have an opportunity to be heard and to have testing of groundwater and wells surrounding the CWL. They also state "Frankly the types of remediation are fairly simple: The contaminants can be captured and then pumped to a treatment area and then released or the contaminants can be dug up and removed from the landfill." Now isn't it time to allow the professionals to de their part? Let us give Waste Services/Waste Management time to finish the job they have already started and have committed thousands of dollars more for continued remediation. If you are ill, do you listen to the opinions of family and friends and stop there, or do you seek the advice of your doctor and specialists? Is Weld County going to base such a wide reaching decision as the fate of Central Weld Landfill on what a group of homemakers, lawyers, pilots, and other novices say, or will the county listen to professionals and specialists in the business - Waste Services/Waste Management, Colorado Department of Health specialists, and Weld County Health Department personel? cote fit Z cam% taistsreas (3/a') 931061 1 March 26, 1993 Page 2 z join my family in wanting to see an intelligent decision reached regarding the Central Weld Landfill adjoining our Spomer family farm. Please don't let emotional frenzy and political pressure alone determine the outcome. Yours tru Katherine S. Hal (307) 326-5873 CC:/donnie Harbert -Chairwoman, Weld County Commissioners John Pickle, Weld County Department of Health Randolph L. Gordon, M.D., M.P.H., Director, Weld County Health Department Lee Morrison, Weld County Assistant Attorney Chuck Cunliffe, Weld County Planning Department Roger Doak, Colorado Department of Health Patricia Nolan, M.D., Executive Director, Colorado Department of Health Barbara Taylor, Water Quality Control Division. Colorado Department of Health 931061 th• ro • •'f O T s O co Pa C x r - ro Cr'C 0 C 8 H CO W N C. c 0 0 ar, W 1 T 0 O 0 SO e -� C> a N co 4-4• O FCC N O ttt I. U r 3•I o r , n W H 931061 • • 5026 Redmond Road Cheyenne, Wyoming 82009 March 26, 1993 Greeley Tribune 501 8th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80632 Dear Editor: I have been reading negative press releases about Central Weld Landfill. I don't like landfills either, but they are a necessary part of the American system. Our garbage -creating lifestyle is not going to go away overnight. The Central Weld Landfill has become a widely publicized issue. A well -organized opposition group has created sensational headlines, but there is more than one side to every story. My family objected to the landfill in 1971 when it was proposed, but their concerns were ignored and over -ridden. The damage was done long ago. Closing the landfill will not make it disappear. My family had plans to build on a site adjacent to the present land -fill boundary, but were forced to consider alternate home-building plans after 1971. They regret their lack of foresight at that time, when they did not urge county officials to see that verbal pledges and agreements be put into a written contract to ensure future compiirnce with the "so -called -promises," "mutually -agreed -upon -arrangements." and Federal, state, and county regulations. Although my family did not want to see a landfill bordering their farm in 1971, we cannot blame Waste Services -Waste Management for the negligence of others in the past. Waste Services/Waste Management is now working at solving many of the problems. Most of the less desirable aspects of the landfill, as with any landfill, really affect only the handful of neighboring land -owners. Thousands of other Weld County residents have not been heard from. Are they willing to pay higher garbage -collection fees to cover the added transportation costs to other sites, give up the convenience of quick Saturday trips to Central Weld Landfill, or pay the added taxes to repair increased miles of highway wear and tear? Exh�b��y c c: tOoaszo t3./.3,) 931061 / Page 2 March 26, 1993 I think it is time to look at the overall picture and weigh both sides of the issue. If the Central Weld Landfill is closed, the hidden costs to all of Weld County's citizens will far outweigh any negative aspects that mainly involve the handful of adjacent landowners. Yours ��t�ruuly , n'tMichael Hayes (307) 632-2908 CC:y2gnnie Harbert -Chairwoman, Weld County Commissioners Joan Pickle, Weld County Department of Health Randolph L. Gordon, M.D., M.P.H., Director,Weld County Health Department Lee Morrison, Weld County Assistant Attorney Chuck Cunliffe, Weld County Planning Department Roger Doak, Colorado Department of Health Patricia Nolan, M.D., Executive Director, Colorado Department of Health Barbara Taylor, Water Quality Control Division, Colorado Department of Health Johnstown Breeze Loveland Daily Reporter -Herald 931061 _2 • VI + CD N O m '• A 7 7 N m a O 91 y R v O a CD O � H o • w Ov a G� I, IJ ! jlI I IJ"i{" li G \Or:C) '1 HI o CD \J1 a f+ I - CD n N N o O P. M cr • in m O r C] '1 '1 '1 O eh a.ma Id O c+ N 0\ N r• W 0 o H y D 931061 • LOUIS E. SPOMER OIL AND GAS PROPERTIES TELEPHONE AREA CODE (303) 757.1442 March 24, 1993 Weld County Commssioners Centennial Center 915 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Re: County Landfill Gentalmen, 4055 SOUTH ONEIDA STREET DENVER, COLORADO 80237 We shouldn't let a handful of people cause the County Commissioners to make another environmental mistake in the future of the Central Weld County Landfill, located east of Milliken. The first handful of people coused the Commissioners to 'Allow the opening of the landfill in 1971. the second handful of people are trying to force the Commissioners to prematurely close the Landfill. Itdoes not serve the community nor the enviroment by the radical actions proposed by these people. The damage caused by the first handful of people cannot be reversed by the second handfull of people's wishful thinking! The fact is; the landfill is there to stay; active or inactive. The far sighted course, for the Commissioners to follow, to best serve the community and the enviroment, is to cooperate with the current operators of the landfill to insure an environmentally safe, normal closing of the landfill at the end of its useful cycle. Very Tr yours, ouis E.Spomer Concerned Landowner br{-X cc 931061 • • March 25. 1993 Mr. Dale Hall Weld County Commissioner Centennial Center 915 10th Street Greeley. Colorado 80631 Dear Mr. Webster, I read with great interest the March 22nd article in the Reporter -Herald concerning the Central Weld Landfill. In particular the comments of Sharon Schmidt about her well water. With some research, she would discover that the well water in that area has never been drinkable because of the hardness of the water. My father drilled our well in the late 1920's or early 1930's. The water was used for garden purposes and livestock. As a child growing up, you were in big trouble with Mother if you got the well water on the windows because it left spots on the window because of the hardness. Before water lines were run to the farmsteads. we had cisterns and we trucked our water to the farm. I remember Dan the Waterman who delivered to our farm. Before Dan the Waterman we had a water tank and would use the farm truck to haul water from Greeley. We never had the technical, chemical anaylsis of the water in those days but this we did know, we did not use it for household use. In modern times, we do not use the well water in automatic horse waterers because the mineral content dogs them. I think no taxpayer should be liable for homeowners use of distilled water as Sharon Schmidt states. I write to you because of my conern of so much information being given by the environmental groups that is unfounded. Yours truly, )ihibi+\N 931061 �1j C c_ e\-32,14.\ $ya,(380 • COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Dedicated to protecting and improving the health and environment of the people of Colorado 4300 Cherry Creek Dr. S. Laboratory Building Denver, Colorado 802224530 4210 E. 11th Avenue Phone (303) 692.2000 Denver, Colorado 80220-3716 (3031691.4700 March 19, 1993 Bill Hedberg Waste Services Corporation .5660 Greenwood Plaza Blvd., Suite 400 Englewood, Colorado 80111 RE: Interim Disposal of Retention Pond Water Central Weld Landfill Weld County, Colorado Dear Mr. Hedberg: I STATE. O COLORADO --J C'. r3 / LU goy Romer Governor Patricia A. Nolan, MD, MPH pecuie Director This letter is to inform you that the Hazardous Materials and Waste Management Division of the Colorado Department of Health (the Division) has reviewed an interoffice memo (enclosed), dated March 19, 1993, from Barbara Taylor of the Water Quality Control Division of the Colorado Department of Health (WQCD). The Division concurs with the contents of the memo from WQCD. The memo is intended as an interim measure only. Once conditions change such that the retention pond is not in jeopardy of overflowing discharge to the adjacent land will stop. Your application for a discharge permit is still under review by WQCD. If you have any questions regarding this issue please contact myself or Barbara Taylor. Roger Doak Geologist Solid Waste Section Hazardous Materials and Waste Management Division enclosure cc: J. Pickle, Weld County Health Department A. Scheere, Waste Management of North America B. Taylor, CDH, WQCD Sae Weld County Planning File: SW/WLD/CEN/ Ca; bti+ V 931061 Vt e� e Date: March 19, 1993 To: Glenn Mallory Roger Doak Solid Waste Management Division Colorado Department of Health Topic: Land Application of Retention Pond Water to approximately 40 Acres of Agricultural Land East of the Weld County Landfill The winter months of 1993 have produced more than the average precipitation in Colorado. As a result of this activity, the retention pond on the eastern corner of the Weld County Landfill has approached overflow. The landfill operators have been attempting to handle the situation by spray -applying the water to the landfill. However, it has become apparent that another solution to the problem is required, especially since more precipitation is expected during the spring season. An alternative solution which has been proposed is to apply the water to approximately 40 acres of agricultural land to the east of the landfill. Colorado does not have established criteria and enforceable standards for waters used for irrigation. The water from the retention pond was tested as recently as November and December of 1992. The water contained no volatile organics and otherwise is characteristic of the water found in the area, as shown by a groundwater study conducted by the Weld County Health Department during the summer of 1992. To summarize: a) The water may be summarized in divalent cations such as associated anions, sulfate, Water hardness, in itself, problem. Rather, it is consequently is treated in as hard, that is, it is high calcium and magnesium and the carbonate, and bicarbonate. is not considered a health an aesthetic problem and large municipal systems. b) The water is high in nitrates, ranging from approximately 9.9 mg/1 to 15.9 mg/1 (as N). c) The water is moderately high in sodium, ranging from 127 to 919 mg/l. V 931061 a .l • • Groundwater sampling in the area east of the landfill can be characterized similarly. The water has a total hardness ranging from 460 to 580 mg/1, sodium 140 to 180 mg/1, and sulfates as high as 380 mg/1. Studies done by the Civil Engineering Department at Colorado State University indicate that alfalfa is one of the more tolerant crops to nitrates, sulfates, and salt solutions. Current non- implementable standards for agriculture require nitrate levels less than 100mg/l. Salinity is a problem in Colorado, especially in the Arkansas River Basin; the levels which have caused problems, however, approach 3500 mg/1. In summary, after an extensive review of the agricultural waters presently being used in the Weld County area for agricultural application, the Division thinks that carefully -managed agricultural application of water from the retention pond to the alfalfa crops to the east of the landfill is appropriate in order to prevent overflow of the retention pond. A more complete review of the water is being done for discharge to the waters of the State. Barbara Taylor Environmental Engineer Page 2 931061 3 • • CC: Trevor Juricek John Pickle Weld County Health 1517-16 Avenue Court Greeley, Colorado 80631 Ashton -Daniels Neighborhood Association Pat Nelson Bob Shukle V 931061 ialis; Attorneys At Law 1775 Sherman Street • Suite 1300 Denver, Colorado 80203 (303) 861-1963 • Fax: (303) 832-4465 Ext. 123 March 22, 1993 Ms. Constance Harbert, Chairperson Weld County Commission 915 Tenth Street, P.O. Box 758 Greeley, Colorado 80632 RE: Hearing of April 5, 1993 Regarding Central Weld County Landfill Dear Ms. Harbert: r c ' �. 9 -, 1 It has been brought to my attention that my 3-17-93 letter to you contains an error in the first paragraph regarding the hearing date. It indeed should be April 5, 1993, not April 15. Thank you for your attention to this matter. • Weld County Commissioners • Mr. Tom David ▪ Mr. Sam Telep • Mr. Lee Morrison • Mr. Chuck Cunliffe • Mr. John Pickle • Ashton -Daniels Neighborhood Citizens Very truly yours, Dee Trees for Greg Hobbs u_ 931061 I COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303) 353.3845, EXT. 3S40 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 1400 N. 17TH AVENUE GREEL EY, COLORADO 80631 March 2, 1993 Waste Services Corporation 40000 Weld County Road 25 Ault, CO 80610 Subject: ZCH-96 Dear Sirs: The Probable Cuase Public Hearing originally scheduled for March 24, 1993, HAS BEEN RESCHEDULED by the Board of County Commissioners. Notice is hereby given that on Monday, April 5, 1993, at 9:00 a.m., or as soon thereafter as the agenda of the Board of County Commissioners permits, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County will hold a Probable Cause public hearing pursuant to Section 81 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance and the policies and procedures of the Weld County Administrative Manual. This meeting will take place in the Commissioners' Hearing Room, Weld County Centennial Center. 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado. The purpose of this public hearing will be to review Case Number SUP -116 for compliance with conditions of approval as approved by th_ Board of County Commissioners on October 6, 1971, to determine if probable cause exists to hold a hearing on revocation of SUP - 116. Mr. John Pickle, in his memorandum dated February 22, 1993- has identified the items of non-compliance with conditions of approval for SUP -116. A copy of his memorandum is attached. If it is determined at the public hearing that there is probable cause that you are not in compliance with SUP -116 the Board of County Commissioners will schedule a Show Cause public hearing to consider revocation of the Special Review permit. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call or write. Respectfully, Chuck Curili £ AICP Director enclosure pc: William J. Hedberg Marian King Bill Jeffry Lee Morrison John Pickle 931061 1 COLORADO • DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303) 353.3345, EXT, 3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 1400 N.17TH AVENUE GREELEY, COLORADO 8C631 March 2, 1993 T0: SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS Subject: ZCH•96 NAME: Waste Services Corporation, c/o Waste Management FOR: Central Weld Sanitary Landfill LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the W2 SW4 and the SE4 SW4 of Section 32, T5N, R66W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado, LOCATION: Approximately 1 1/2 miles northeast of the Town of Milliken. A Probable Cause Public Hearing originally scheduled before the Weld County Board of County Commissioners on Wednesday, March 24, 1993, HAS BEEN RESCHEDULED to Monday, April 5, 1993, at 9:00 a.m., or as soon thereafter as the agenda of the Board of County Commissioners permits, in the County Commissioners' Hearing Room, First Floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley. Colorado. The purpose of this public hearing will be to review Case Number SUP -116 for compliance with conditions of approval as approved by the Board of County Commissioners on October 6, 1971, to determine if probable cause exists to hold a hearing on revocation of SUP -116. You are receiving this notification because your property is within five -hundred (500) feet of the property being reviewed. All persons in any manner interested are requested to attend and may give testimony pertaining to the uses occurring on the approved site. For additional information write or telephone, Chuck Cunliffe. • CERTIFICATE OF MAILING The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Notice of Hearing, was placed in the United States mail, postage prepaid, addressed to the following property owners. DATED this day of GREGORY J. HOBBS, JR. HOBBS, TROUT & RALEY, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1775 SHERMAN STREET, SUITE 1300 DENVER, CO 80203 SENATOR HANK BROWN 1100 TENTH STREET, ROOM 201 GREELEY, CO 80631 SENATOR TOM NORTON SENATE CHAMBERS STATE CAPITOL BUILDING DENVER, CO 80203 , 1993. 'Ili a- Vlrlice Deputy Clerk to the Board T 931061 3 0 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Notice of Hearing, was placed in the United States mail, postage prepaid, addressed to the following property owners. DATED this o1,J—th day of CRAIG A. SMITH D.C. SMITH CHIROPRACTIC OFFICES. P.C. 801 ELEVENTH AVENUE GREELEY, CO 80631 Dep y Clerk to the Board , 1993. T 931061 c/ S CERTIFICATE OF MAILING The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the foregoing documents, was placed in the United States mail, postage prepaid, addressed to the following property owners. DATED this c:93 DON HOFF ATTORNEY AT LAW 1025 9TH AVENUE, SUITE #309 GREELEY, CO 80631 WALKER MILLER ATTORNEY AT LAW 822 7TH STREET GREELEY, CO 80631 day of 772QQ{`h . 1993. l/ 9I //I la c_! Depu Clerk to the Board 931061 COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303) 353.3845, EXT. 3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 1400 N. 17TH AVENUE GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 March 2, 1993 Waste Services Corporation 40000 Weld County Road 25 Ault, CO 80610 Subject: ZCH-96 Dear Sirs: The Probable Cuase Public Hearing originally scheduled for March 24, 1993, HAS BEEN RESCHEDULED by the Board of County Commissioners. Notice is hereby given that on Monday, April 5, 1993, at 9:00 a.m., or as soon thereafter as the agenda of the Board of County Commissioners permits, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County will hold a Probable Cause public hearing pursuant to Section 81 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance and the policies and procedures of the Weld County Administrative Manual. This meeting will take place in the Commissioners' Hearing Room, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado. The purpose of this public hearing will be to review Case Number SUP -116 for compliance with conditions of approval as approved by the Board of County Commissioners on October 6, 1971, to determine if probable cause exists to hold a hearing on revocation of SUP - 116, Mr. John Pickle, in his memorandum dated February 22, 1993, has identified the items of non-compliance with conditions of approval for SUP -116. A copy of his memorandum is attached. If it is determined at the public hearing that there is probable cause that you are not in compliance with SUP -116 the Board of County Commissioners will schedule a Show Cause public hearing to consider revocation of the Special Review permit. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call or write, Respectfully, C�—a Chuck una , AICP Director enclosure pc: William J. Hedberg Marian King Bill Jeffry Lee Morrison John Pickle -T- cc: Oar % &v rfL664 931061 • WilDe COLORADO March 2, 1993 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303) 353.3645, EXT. 3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 1400 N. 17TH AVENUE GREELEY, COLORADO SC631 TO: SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS Subject: ZCH-96 NAME: Waste Services Corporation, c/o Waste Management FOR: Central Weld Sanitary Landfill LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the W2 SW4 and the SE4 SW4 of Section 32, T5N, R66W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: Approximately 1 1/2 miles northeast of the Town of Milliken. A Probable Cause Public Hearing originally scheduled before the Weld County Board of County Commissioners on Wednesday, March 24, 1993, HAS BEEN RESCHEDULED to Monday, April 5, 1993, at 9:00 a.m., or as soon thereafter as the agenda of the Board of County Commissioners permits, in the County Commissioners' Hearing Room, First Floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado. The purpose of this public hearing will be to review Case Number SUP -x16 for compliance with conditions of approval as approved by the Board of County Commissioners on October 6, 1971, to determine if probable cause exists to hold a hearing on revocation of SUP -116. You are receiving this notification because your property is within five -hundred (500) feet of the property being reviewed. All persons in any manner interested are requested to attend and may give testimony pertaining to the uses occurring on the approved site. For additional information write or telephone, Chuck Cunli££e. T 931061 CERTIFICATj OF MAILING I hereby certify that I have placed a true and correct copy of the surrounding property owners in accordance with the notification requirements of Weld County in Case Number ZCH-96 for Waste Services Corporation in the United States Mail, postage prepaid First Class Mail by letter as addressed on the attached list. this 2nd day of March, 1993. 931061 'r" SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS Waste Services Corporation ZCH-96 Ella Marie Hayes and Susanne Stephens, et al. 095931000007 Box 773 095932000008 Saratoga, WY 82331 105705000034 G.D. Mossberg and Janet Lea Sherrod-Mossberg 4603 83rd Avenue Greeley, CO 80634 Arthur P. Garcia 13998 Weld County Road 378 Milliken, CO 80543 018 095932000010 105705000043 Heirs of Ann Spomer, et al 015 c/o Louis Reikert, 1st National Bank P.O. Box 1058 Greeley, CO 80632 Samuel S. and Myrtle Ann Telep 016 2315 54th Avenue 017 Greeley, CO 80634 Keith V. Melodie R. Steven D. and Douglas L. Kammerzcll 12314 Highway 60 Milliken, CO 80543 105706000028 -r 931061 COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303)353-3845, EXT. 3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 1400 N. 17TH AVENUE GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 February 25, 1993 Waste Services Corporation 40000 Weld County Road 25 Ault, CO 80610 Subject: ZCH-96 Dear Sirs: Notice is hereby given that on Wednesday, March 24, 1993, at 9:00 a.m., or as soon thereafter as the agenda of the Board of County Commissioners permits, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County will hold a Probable Cause public hearing pursuant to Section 81 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. This meeting will take place in the Commissioners' Hearing Room, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado. The purpose of this public hearing will be to review Case Number SUP -116 for compliance with conditions of approval as approved by the Board of County Commissioners on October 6, 1971, to determine if probable cause exists to hold a hearing on revocation of SUP - 116. Mr. John Pickle, in his memorandum dated February 22, 1993, has identified the items of non-compliance with conditions of approval for SUP -116. A copy of his memorandum is attached. If it is determined at the public hearing that there is probable cause that you are not in compliance with SUP -116 the Board of County Commissioners will schedule a Show Cause public hearing to consider revocation of the Special Review permit. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call or write. Respectfully, Cr Chuck Cunliffe, AICP Director CC/sfr enclosure pc: William J. Hedberg Marian King Bill Jeffry Lee Morrison John Pickle S logj... O, gin COLORADO • mEmoRAnDum To From Subject: Chuck Cunliffe, Planning February 22, 1993 John Pickle, Healt Central Weld Sanitary Landfill This memorandum is a follow-up to our meeting with Waste Management and Waste Services on February 18, 1993. Since that time, I have also met with Glenn Mallory, and Roger Doak, Solid Waste Division, and Pat Nelson, Water Quality Division, Colorado Department of Health. In response to these meetings, it is the opinion of this Division that the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill continues in a state of non-compliance. We submit the following areas of concern as violations: 1. The operators of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill have not submitted a complete Design and Operations Plan. (See attached letter of February 22, 1993). This is a violation of C.R.S. 30-20-103. 2. The Central Weld Sanitary Landfill continues to operate without required Discharge Permits. This is a violation of Subsection 2.1.2. of the Solid Waste Regulations, and 25-8-501, C.R.S. In conference with Pat Nelson, Water Quality Division, their position is that the absence of the required permits constitutes technical violation of the Rules; however, they are holding further enforcement in abeyance so long as this facility continues to proceed in good faith with the Discharge Permit application process. Our Division agrees with this position. 3. The Central Weld Sanitary Landfill continues to contaminate the groundwater. A review of the Hydrogeologic and Geotechnical Characterization and supporting documents indicate that a portion of this contamination is due to a lack of adequate cover and adequate surface drainage. This is a violation of Subsections 2.1.2 of the Solid Waste Regulations, specifically, 3.11.5 of the Water Quality Control Commission Rules, and 2.1.4. of the Solid Waste Regulations. In conference with Glenn Mallory and Roger Doak, Solid Waste Division, Colorado Department of Health, their position is still as outlined in their letter of December 23, 1992. 4. The Central Weld Sanitary Landfill has allowedsolid waste to come into contact with groundwater on this site. A review of the Hydrogeologic and Geotechnical Characterization and supporting documents indicate that this condition is due to a lack of adequate cover and adequate surface drainage. This is a violation of Subsections 2.1.2 of the Solid Waste Regulations, specifically, 3.11.5 of the Water Quality Control Commission Rules, and 2.1.4. of the Solid Waste Regulations. In addition, this will be a violation of Subsection 3.1.10 of revised Solid Waste Regulations, which are schedule' effective in April, 1993. •a r+ n . __.,. Men.,ine 931061 /0 This Division, and the Colorado Department of Health continue to feel that items 0 3 and 0 4 constitute a public nuisance. Consequently, we would request that these violations be brought to the attention of the Board of County Commissioners, in the form of a public hearing. Should you need additional information, please contact me. ENV1342 XC: Lee Morrison, Assistant County Attorney Randolph Gordon, M.D., M.P.H. Glenn Mallory, Solid Waste Division David Holm, Water Quality Division r(1e,r.g\v1) Ili FEB 2 3 199 ylll 1 931061 / / (flt r�� to COLORADO February 22, 1993 William J. Hedberg Waste Services Corporation 6037 77th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 8C634 Dear Mr. Hedberg: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 1517 - 16 AVENUE COURT GREELEY. COLORADO 50631 ADMINISTRATION (303) 16.3./486 NEALTN PROTECTION (303) 353-0635 COMMUNITY 4EALTN (303) 35]-0639 The Environmental Protection Division of the Weld County Health Department has received the "Preliminary Design, Operations, and Closure Plan", Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, Weld County, Colorado. Initial review has revealed the document to be incomplete as submitted. Page 4- I, Section 4.0, refers to a series of sheets (Nos. 1 through 20) which have not been provided as part of the document. The Division has ceased review of this document pending receipt of all necessary doucments. In addition, the Division requests that the term "preliminary" be defined as it occurs in the document title. If you have any question, you may contact me at (303) 353-0635. Sincerely, ohn S. Pickle, M.S.E.H. Director, Environmental Protection Services TJ-359 cc: Alan Scheere, Waste Management of North America, Inc. Roger Doak, Colorado Department of Health Lee Morrison, Assistant Weld County Attorney Chuck Cunliffe, Weld County Planning Department \ FEB 2 3 1993 1\ •... J ,...-,.. ,iI,IA..,wr 931061 /0- COLORADO • • DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303) 3533845, EXT. 3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 1400 N. 17TH AVENUE GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 February 25, 1993 TO: SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS Subject: ZCH-96 NAME: Waste Services Corporation, c/o Waste Management FOR; Central Weld Sanitary Landfill LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the W2 SW4 and the SE4 SW4 of Section 32, T5N, R66W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: Approximately 1 1/2 miles northeast of the Town of Milliken. A Probable Cause Public Hearing is scheduled before the Weld County Board of County Commissioners on Wednesday, March 24, 1993, at 9:00 a.m., or as soon thereafter as the agenda of the Board of County Commissioners permits, in the County Commissioners' Hearing Room, First Floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado. The purpose of this public hearing will be to review Case Number SUP -116 for compliance with conditions of approval as approved by the Board of County Commissioners on October 6, 1971, to determine if probable cause exists to hold a hearing on revocation of SUP -116. You are receiving this notification because your property is within five -hundred (500) feet of the property being reviewed. All persons in any manner interested are requested to attend and may give testimony pertaining to the uses occurring on the approved site. For additional information write or telephone, Chuck Cunlif£e. 931061 /3 Waste Services Corporation 6037 77th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80634 303/330-2641 February 5, 1993 RAND DELIVERED 6 Mr. Chuck Cunliffe, AICP Weld County Department of Planning Services 1400 North 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 Dear Mr. Cunliffe: A Waste Management Comoary We are in receipt of your letter of January 18, 1993, in which it is stated that the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill (CWSL) is not in compliance with Condition of Approval Number 1 on the Board of County Commissioners' Resolution dated October 6, 1971. Your letter included "memorandum from Mr. Pickle and a letter from Mr. Jiricek," which identified alleged violations of applicable requirements. You also stated in your letter that the facility must be brought into compliance with the Conditions of Approval within thirty days from the date of your letter. I am writing this letter to seek clarification on what will be required to comply with your request. We are seeking this clarification because we are genuinely confused as to the applicability of this condition to the current operation of the landfill. This condition states that the "facility to be installed shall be approved by the State Health Department." The clear implication from the use of the phrase "facility to be installed" is that this Condition referred to a one time approval to be obtained prior to the installation of the landfill. The County was required by statute (Cob. Rev. Stat. § 30-20-103) to refer the application for the Certificate of Designation (CD) to the Colorado Department of Health (CDH) for review and recommendation prior to issuance of the CD. The County was further prohibited by statute (Cob. Rev. Stat. § 30-20-107) from issuing a CD if CDH recommended disapproval. The County was able to issue the CD because CDH did not recommend disapproval of the application. During the 1971 hearing on this matter, Orville Stoddard of CDH stated, "This is a suitable site and can be operated as a sanitary landfill." It is our understanding that CDH did not, in 1971, and, in fact, never has had the authority or mechanism for granting after the fact approvals such as the one referenced in Condition 1. In Federal Devosit Insurance Corporation v_ Board of County Cornmissione of Arapahoe County, (copy attached) the court determined that no such "approval" was required. Therefore, this lack of a mechanism for obtaining CDH "approval" was the reason no approval was obtained in 1971 and, furthermore, it is likely the reason why no citation was issued either when the landfill was constructed or at any time during the ensuing 21 years. It could be assumed that the original landfill owner and the other three owners prior to the purchase of the landfill by Waste Services Corporation (WSC) relied on the County's silence on this matter in not pursuing any such approval from CDH or clarification from the County on this point. 931061 /4/ • Mr. Chuck Cunliffe February 5, 1993 Page 2 In 1986, WSC and its predecessors received and relied upon affirmative County approval of the transfer of ownership of the CD without any objection to any aspect of the site operations. We are concerned that WSC, the current owner of CWSL, is being notified of alleged non- compliance 21 years after the permit was issued. In fact, the County Commissioners most recently considered, on January 20, 1992, the continued operation of CWSL and concluded that the site complied with all County regulations. You indicated in your letter that Mr. Pickle's memorandum dated January 8, 1993, and Mr. Jiricek's letter dated January 14, 1993, outline the violations of Condition of Approval Number 1. Mr. Pickle's memorandum and Mr. Jiricek's letter contain alleged violations of "Colorado Regulations Pertaining to Solid Waste Disposal Sites and Facilities." No Notices of Violation have been received from CDH regarding operation of CWSL. Since none of the alleged violations by the County involve CDH approval or disapproval of the facility, we suggest that none of these alleged violations, even if established, could constitute a violation of Condition of Approval Number 1. You stated in your letter that the County has not yet made a determination as to whether CWSL is in compliance with Condition of Approval Number 2. This Condition requires "[t]hat all applicable subdivision regulations and zoning regulations shall be followed and complied with in accordance with the Zoning Regulations of Weld County, Colorado." We believe that we are, and always have been, in compliance with this Condition. If we are advised of specific violations of this condition, we will address those issues upon receipt of notification from the County. We wish, however, to cooperate with the County and, to that end, stand prepared to work with the County in taking whatever steps are necessary to comply with all applicable requirements. In an effort to further understand the County's concerns and needs, WSC's representatives met with Lee Morrison, Trevor Jiricek and Keith Schuett on Friday, January 22nd. During that meeting, we went through each of the items in Mr. Pickle's memorandum. Based on those discussions, it is our understanding that the County would interpret items 3 and 5 in Mr. Pickle's memorandum as violations of Condition Number 1. We would dispute any such interpretation. We believe that Mr. Pickle's and Mr. Jiricek's allegations are subject to debate and are, we hope, also subject to discussion. We would like, therefore, to offer the following discussion of each of the points raised by them in this collective singular response. Both Mr. Pickle and Mr. Jiricek identified six items of concern; five of which are the same and will be addressed jointly. The remaining two will be identified by author. 9;;1061 /5 • • Mr. Chuck Cunliffe February 5, 1993 Page 3 1. The operators did not file a Design and Operation Plan. Besuonse: On September 18, 1992, C0H acknowledged that a Design and Operations Plan is not required at CWSL (see attached letter from Mr. Kent Hanson). In the FDIC case referenced above, the court determined that no State approval of such plans was required. As a result of this determination, this concern of the County cannot be construed to be :a violation of Condition Number 1. Nevertheless, WSC, at the request of the Board of Commissioners, voluntarily accelerated its schedule to develop a Preliminary Design Operation and Closure Plan and a Conceptual Site Development Plan. These were submitted to the County and to the CDH on December 31, 1992 and November 16, 1992 respectively. These Plans will be further refined as the COB implements Subtitle D, which is currently scheduled to occur prior to its effective date of October 1993. Copies of these Plans and reports are submitted and included herewith. 2. The Central Weld Sanitary Landfill has operated without required Discharge Permits. Response: An underdrain was constructed at the `acility in late 1982 to early 1983. The purpose of the underdrain is to maintain groundwater levels below the base of the refuse in the landfill. Immediately upon obtaining an interest in CWSL, Waste Management of Colorado, Inc. (WMC) conducted an indepth audit of the facility's compliance with applicable requirements. Even though the County had conducted routine testing of the flow from the underdrain and had never notified WSC that a discharge permit was required, WMC determined during the audit, that such a permit may be required. Over the past several months, WSC gathered the necessary information to prepare a discharge permit application. The application was submitted to CDH on November 24, 1992 (a copy is attached). The CDH has now requested additional information which WSC is expeditiously preparing. WSC has tested the pond which receives flow from the underdrain and found no volatile organic compound (VOC) contamination. We are confident that any required permit will be issued in the near future. 3. The Central Weld Sanitary Landfill contaminated groundwater. Resaonse: Information provided by WSC to the Weld County Department of Health (WCDH), as part of the facility's hydrogeologic site characterization, showed low level groundwater contamination downgradient of the site. Additional testing showed no contamination 200 feet beyond the south property boundary. On December 17, 1992, r 921061 /l Mr. Chuck Cunliffe February 5, 1993 Page 4 WSC submitted proposals to WCDH and CDH for remedial measures. Based on subsequent discussions with CDH and WCDH, WSC is proceeding with refinements to the remedial measures outlined in the December 17th letter (a copy is attached). We do not, however, believe that the existence of groundwater contamination is a violation of any regulatory or permit requirement. 4. The Central Weld County Sanitary Landfill has allowed ponding of water on site. Resoouse: The ponding referred to is the retention pond specifically designed and constructed to collect water from the french drain and the perimeter ditch that collects surface water run-on from the adjacent property, and non -contact surface water run-off from the landfill. The french drain and perimeter ditch system was designed to and does divert water around and away from the facility pursuant to Section 2.2.2 of the Colorado Minimum Standards regulations. The retention pond was constructed in the undeveloped eastern portion of the landfill over a year and one-half ago. The pond has been visible at all rimes since construction and, until Mr. Pickle's memorandum, has never been commented on by either CDH or WCDH. As the pond is not located over refuse, there is clearly no violation of Section 2.1.4 of the Colorado Minimum Standards. 5. The Central Weld Sanitary Landfill has placed soliid waste into the groundwater at the site in violation of Section 2.1.4 of the Colorado Minimum Standards. Respo . There is no evidence that solid waste was placed in groundwater at CWSL. Furthermore, interviews with employees indicate that: waste was not placed in groundwater during the time of their employment (1979 to present). The underdrain discussed in response to number 2 above was constructed to alleviate potential groundwater contact with waste. Preliminary site development plans also include engineering improvements to further prevent the potential for groundwater to come into contact with waste after its placement. Section 2.1.4 contains no prohibition against the placement of waste in groundwater. Therefore, even i,f waste had been placed in groundwater at the facility, it would not be in violation of this Section. 6. This facility is currently operating without an emissions permit. (Mr. firicek) a 931061 /7- • Mr. Chuck Cunliffe February 5, 1993 Page 5 Response: The provisions of Regulation Number 3, Section 1.A. which require an emissions permit do not apply to the CWSL. This conclusion was confirmed by the WCDH in a letter from Jeffrey Stoll, Air Pollution Specialist, dated September 2, 1992, a copy of which is attached. Mr. Jiricek's comment in his January 14th letter is in conflict with the earlier direction we had received from the County. WSC continues to believe that such a permit is not required and that we are not in violation of Section 1.A. We nonetheless submitted on January 20, 1993, Air Pollution Emission Notice (APEN) for fugitive particulate emissions. (A copy of this submission is attached) 7. In the absence of any Design and Operation Plan, the only basis for establishment of parameters for the 1971 permits are the representations of the applicant at the time the permit was considered by the Board of Commissioners. (Mr. Pickle) Resionse: The October 6, 1971 Resolution contains the two conditions discussed earlier in this letter. Quite clearly if the Board had felt additional restrictions were necessary they would have included them in the resolutions. However, there are no restrictions on either height or duration contained within the 1971 resolution. When the Board issued the permit in 1971, there was no requirement that there be a Design and Operation Plan for the facility and, even though the Board could have required such a plan if they felt it was necessary, they did not do so. Therefore, the absence of a Design and Operation Plan in 1971 cannot constitute a violation. Mr. Pickle indicated in his memorandum that OH has determined that the violations outlined in 3 and 5 above constitute a public nuisance. Mr. Morrison at our meeting, related that this comment originated in a December 21, 1992 letter from CDH to me. In that letter, the CDH identified two areas of non-compliance. Even though CDH indicated that CWSL is not in compliance with Section 2.1.4 of the regulations, WSC believes that CWSL is in full compliance with all applicable requirements including those in Section 2.1.4. WSC has discussed this matter with CDH and understands that CDH is considering this matter further and has not reached a final decision. Since CDH identified the second issue as a potent;] area of non-compliance if Dr000scd regulations are adopted without change, any issue of compliance, can and should be addressed if and when a regulation is adopted. We are monitoring the proposed regulation carefully and will ensure that the facility is in compliance with any requirements ultimately adopted. 931061 /g • Mr. Chuck Cunliffe February 5, 1993 Page 6 In January of this year, the CDH published a document entitled, "Central Weld Sanitary Landfill Questions and Answers" (copy attached). You will note that the document cites no violations and expresses no disapproval of the continued operation of the landfill. Since WSC has either addressed or is currently addressing all of the County's concerns, we ask for clarification as to what specific additional actions are required by your office to show compliance with the Conditions of Approval. As we have discussed, we are working with the CDH to address the concerns set forth in Item 3 above. Until the CDH makes a final determination as to whether or not we have adequately addressed their concerns, we submit that any action by the Board dealing with Conditions of Approval Number 1 would be premature. We request that after your review of this submission, another meeting be held prior to the expiration of your 30 -day limit to consider the adequacy of our response to your January 18, 1993 letter. Please contact me to establish a date and time to meet. Also, please feel free to contact me should you require additional information. Very truly yours, William J. Hedberg Division Vice President WAJ: nlp Attachments cc: Lee Morrison, Assistant Weld County Attorney Roger Doak, Colorado Department of Health Weld County Commissioners: Constance Harbert, Chairman (wiattachmerus) Bill Webster (w/attachments) Dale Hall (w/attachments) George Baxter (wlattachments) Barbara Kirluneyer (w/attachments) c.b, \ maxims V 931061 /9 WUDc COLORADO January 18, 1993 Waste Services. Inc. C/0 Waste Management P.O. Box 122283 Ft. Worth, Tx. 76121 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303) 3533845, EXT. 3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 1400 N. 17TH AVENUE GREELEY, COLORADO 80831 Subject: Violation Notice - ZCH-96 on a parcel of hind described as part of the W2 SW4 and the SE4 SW4 of Section 32, T5N, R66W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. Dear Sirs: A review of your property was conducted to determine if the Conditions of Approval placed on the property at the time SUP -116 was approved by the Board of County Commissioners are in compliance. The review revealed violations of Condition of Approval #1. John Pickle's memorandum dated January 8, 1993, and Trevor Jiricek's certified letter Number P423 630 398 dated January 14, 1993, outlines the violations of Condition of Approval #1 on the Board of County Commissioners' Resolution dated October 6, 1971. The Department of Planning Services is still evaluating the possibility of violations of Condition of Approval #2 on the Board of County Commissioners' Resolution dated October 6, 1971. You will be notified if violations are identified during the .Department's evaluation. Copies of John Pickle's memorandum dated January 8. 1993, Trevor Jiricek's certified letter dated January 14, 1993, and the Board of County Commissioners' Resolution dated October 6, 1971 are enclosed for your review. The Use by Special Review area must be brought into compliance with the Conditions of Approval within 30 days from the date of this letter. Noncompliance will result in our office scheduling a Probable Cause Hearing before the Board of County Commissioners. If the Board determines there is sufficient probable cause to warrant further action, a Show Cause Hearing will be scheduled to consider revocation of the Use by Special Review permit 116. If you have information that may clear up this matter, please call or write. Sincerely, C-ktat Chuck Cunlifft, AICP Director enclosures pc: William J. Hedberg Bill Jeffry Lee Morrison, Assistant County Attorney John Pickle, Weld County Health Department 931061 a COLORADO • mEmORAnDUM Chuck Cunliffe, Planning To fly. John Pickle, Healtktff_ j. From Central Weld Sanitary Landfill Subject: January 8. 1993 1 The Central Weld facility has been the subject of very close monitoring over the past six (6) months. Disclosure of offsite groundwater contamination by Waste Management in August 1992, along with growing community concern, prompted increased surveillance since July, 1992, and it continues to the present. During this time period, Environmental Protection staff have spent considerable time in field inspections of the site, meetings and correspondence with Waste Management, Waste Services, Colorado Department of Health, and other county offices, as well as review of reports and records from the facility. In the process of these activities we have determined the following areas of concern, which our Division submits as violations: 1. The operators of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill did not file a Design and Operations plan, although a partial submission was made at the County's request on November 12. 1992. Additional information is still being submitted as it is developed by Waste Services. This failure to file would be a violation of C.R.S. 30-20-103 and Subsection 3.1.2 of the Solid Waste Regulations. There is some question as to whether or not this was a requirement at the time this facility was permitted. Such a report was required in the 1971 Amendments to the Solid Waste Act prior to the hearing by the Board of County Commissioners, but the Act requires such a report only "as may be required by the [State Health) Department by regulation." The State appears to have decided that no report was necessary as they treated the landfill as a grandfathered site. Regardless of the State's position, it appears that the Board of County Commissioners expected such a review and that one never occurred. A review of the files does not show that there ever has been an "approval" by the State Health Department, though there has been some correspondence in recent months. The only correspondence that could be construed as any kind of approval, was that of Dennis Hotovec, approving a change of operator, so long as the landfill continued to be operated in accordance with an operations plan, which apparently, has never existed. 2. The Central Weld Sanitary Landfill has operated without required Discharge Permits. This is a violation of Subsection 2.1.2. of the Solid Waste Regulations, and 25-8-501, Colorado Revised Statutes. 3. The Central Weld Sanitary Landfill contaminated the ground water. This is a violation of Subsection 2.1.4. of the Solid Waste Regulations. The facility has been notified of this violation by our Division on October 5, 1992, and also by the Colorado Department of Health on December 23, 1992. V ,'JAN 1 1 1993 yifryte mina oU • Chuck Cunliffe, Planning Department Re: Central Weld Sanitary Landfill January 8, 1993 Page 2 4. The Central Weld Sanitary Landfill has allowed ponding of water onsite. This is a violation of Subsection 2.1.4., and 2.2.2. of the Solid Waste Regulations. 5. The Central Weld Sanitary Landfill has placed solid waste into the groundwater on this site. This is a violation of Subsections 2.1.4 of the Solid Waste Regulations, and will be a violation of Subsection 3.1.10 of the revised Solid Waste Regulations. These regulations are scheduled to become effective in April, 1993. 6. In the absence of any design and operations plan, the only basis for establishment of the parameters for the 1971 permits, are the representations of the applicant at the time the permits were considered by the Board of County Commissioners. Those representations did not contemplate a regional landfill with a life of thirty-five (35) years, but rather one with an expected life of less than twenty (20) years. The representations did not contemplate placing fill above the existing grade as Waste Services currently plans. (Reference Design and Operations Plan, Sheet # 7) The Colorado Department of Health has determined that violations outlined in #4 and #6 above constitute a public nuisance. Environmental Protection Services Division concurs with this determination. Consequently, we would request that these violations at the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, be brought to the attention of the Board of County Commissioners, in the form of a public hearing for probable cause. Should you need any additional information, please contact me. /.7p-011 xc: Randolph L. Gordon, M.D., M.P.H., Director, Weld County Health Department Lee Morrison, Weld County Assistant Attorney 921061 as COLORADO r`='rI?41V/" Jt1P! 1 4 1993 January 14, 1993 Certified Letter No.: P 423 630 398 William J. Hedberg Waste Services Corporation 6037 77th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 Dear Mr. Hedberg: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 1517 • 16 AVENUE COURT GREELEY. COLORA00 80631 ADMINISTRATION (303) 353.0586 HEALTH PROTECTION (303) 353-0635 COMMUNITY HEALTH (303) 3534639 On December 20, 1992. a representative of the Environmental Protection Division of the Weld County Health Department inspected the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, located at 6037 77th Avenue, Greeley. in Weld County, Colorado. The purpose of the inspection was to inspect and assess the facilities compliance with the "Regulations Pertaining to Solid Waste Disposal Sites and Facilities" (The Regulations) as promulgated by the Solid Waste Disposal Sites and Facilities Act (The Act), Title 30, Article 20, Part 1. C.R.S., as amended. On the date of the December 20, 1992, field inspection. the following was observed, or has been observed previously: 1. This facility continues to discharge pollutants into state waters without an approved discharge permit. 2. This facility continues to allow water to pond on the eastern portion of the facility. 3. This facility continues to operate in the absence of an approved Design and Operations plan. 4. This facility has contaminated the groundwater beyond the facility property line. 5. Solid waste has been placed into groundwater at this site. 6. This facility is currently operating without an emissions permit. It has been documented that previously disposed solid waste is currently exposed to groundwater and that groundwater pollution has occurred at this location. As you are aware, subsection 2.1.4 of The Regulations states that "A site and facility operated as a sanitary landfill shall provide means of finally disposing of solid wastes on land in a manner to minimize nuisance conditions...." and that 931%1 al3 • S RESOLUTION WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on September 22, 1971, at 2:00 P.M., in the chambers of the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, for the purpose of hearing the petition of Weld County Landfill, Inc., Box 596, Evans, Colorado. requesting approval of site for a sanitary landfill, also known as a solid and/or liquid waste disposal business on the following described property, to wit: West [Tall of the Southwest Quarter (W,' -,,SW;) and the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (SE;SW;) of Section 32, Township 5 North, Range 66 West of the 6th P. M., Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the petitioner was present and represented by Earl Moffat, and WHEREAS, there was some opposition to the request of petitioner for the location of a sanitary landfill at said location, and WHEREAS, the said requested sanitary landfill operation is located in an agricultural zone as set forth in the Weld County Zoning Resolution, and WHEREAS, according to Section 3.3(2) of the Zoning Resolution of Weld County, said sanitary landfill operation may be authorized upon the approval of the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners heard all the testimony and statements of those present; has studied the request of the petitioner; and studied the recommendations of the Weld County Planning Commission, and having been fully informed; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of County Commissioners, Weld County, Colorado, that the application of Weld County Landfill, Inc. to locate a sanitary landfill on the premises indicated above, be, and it hereby is granted under the conditions following: 1, That any sanitary landfill facility to be installed shall be approved by the State Health Department. 2. That all applicable subdivision regulations and zoning regulations shall be followed and complied with in accordance with the Zoning Resolutions of Weld County, Colorado. .Dated this 6th day of October, A.D., 1971. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO AYE ATTEST: 1 •aye..`) a i,tt) J Deputy County Clerk ti County At orney CCI Landfill PC u,., I' , n.,., 931061 a4L THIS DEED. Male this third day of Dece:lber it, $5 h.%..yn Colorado Land( ill, ❑tc•. at...nauk .0 ean„ rd imd eltitine un•ler ard by 'thaw "1 t he Iowa of he $ii. i".r CO_oradn .d the neat para..n4 Waste Se re tees. Inc.. a Colorado Corporation c/o Lynn Keirnee rh...lrnlannrr..,. 1253 - 49th Avenue, Greel,,)', CO 80634 runtynr Weld of the ..send part: R.e.rder'a S,.ee 5r;1., DOGt.n.entoy Fee Loru_fEC 4 SCE $ _• Id State of Colorado W ITNES$I TN, Th.t the laid party of the fit.% part, for and m eonsidennon atthe rum el Other Good and Valuable Consida:acione and Ten and no/100----------- DOLLAR?. ,e the nod party of the trot part in hand paid by the said party of the rand part. the wept whereof o hereby confessed and acknowledged. hag granted. b I med. veld end conveyed and by thaw prwenl. dw. rant. hercain, mall. convey and confirm unto the maid part y of the .stand part its hot and *nig" forever, all of the fountain. derrr.hed la' - or Parrel s of land, .faaats. lying and being in the (thinly of Weld and Stat.ofcolorad.. to wit. Ina w1/2Sv1/4 and the SE1/4SWL/4 of Section 32. Township 5 North. Rang. 66 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado, exciPting therefrom that parcel conveyed by deed recorded March 11, 1930 in gook891 at Page 143, together with all water rights appurtenant to said property, and:certificate of designation No. / for operation of a solid waste disposal site granted by the Board of County ' Commissioners of Weld County. Colorado. also known a street and numhrr TOGETHER with all and *ineuls,' the hereditament, and awn l.n.nrue thereinto b.lansins. or in dnywmr spier isin,nt and the 'on nr .v.raion,.remaodors. rents. moon •nd profits thereof, and all the crone rght. title, interest. elm co and demnnd whatso*arot the said party of t ho Ant perm. ail her in fewer sgwty. et in and to l ed above berm. 4.• nren,aw, with the hared'tamenta and appar ton one's. TO NAVE AND Ttt HOLD th..a.Apenman alines bargained and dewnbed. with the appurtanaecea,unte the said .. party of thewcood port. lt. h.in and amine f . And the said Colorado Landfill. Inc., a Colorado Corporation party of the first part. for Mar. and it.,urnewrr. do..o covenant.gran t. barren and agree ,n and with%nevoid pas y ofth. second part. its hew. and amen.. that a the Um., of the enseallne and delivery of thew prwema itb wvt a .ailed of the premises abet ....owned. la of a road, sum pe:'fart, absolute and md.bmble mist* of inherit nut, in law. In tor simple and has good right. full power and lawful .tut Monty to grant, bargain. mall and convey the some in • manner and form afore's:di and that the same are free and clear from all fernier and other gram*. bargain', orbe liens, taxes. awnment.and incumbrahcy& orwhatever kind or naturogneyer. subject to a mortgage CO United Bank of Fort Collins, National Association veto -dad in Book 897 as Reception No. 1818904 and subject CO a financing statement to United Bank of Fort Colline,aa• Trustee filed under Nc. U199868 and recorded in Book 1062 as RaceptiOM No. 2002449, all recorded in Weld County Records which grants. agrees and assumes to pay. Alpo subject to those items attached hereto as Exhibit "A". and the above harVmned premises In the quiet and leviable pomemon of the Said part y any...rond Iwo CDF its hen and onion*. against all and erere Derwin or persons ab lawfully e,niinp or to Ma th*whale • erne part therwf, the laid party et thie Aral part ash and will WARRANT ANDFOREVER DEFEND. $75.00 INWITNESS ITNESS WHEREOF. Thy amid piety of the Drat part na• caused lit ferpont* came to b* hereunto subscribed bYela t 1-lrr""•Peredeet. and its corporal* mad her to be.0mst d. d. tad by 4Bn4ll:..y thddai hod year fast above written. i Aml. AC V. I ref 6, • SS•19.CQdt.laS ,L=ant s a.ScS.121L42 Corporation �) fir. sz,. ,t'+.I '•f,y r r YrMEOF COLORADO. �.. a 1pv1.... 'en Cowry at veld O �o 0 �r Iufbein.istmtwmml.w acknowledged before me this Chi re day of December + • hilt Yiw 4.4. Danny ISouders n i'rn,dem and dory Nor60n o. Secretary of Cdlorado ;and! 111. Inc., a Colorado Yrnrpara,un. Mynetaraicemml..tennpra October 23, 1989 Witness my hand and allele seal. n(1r[/,/,,(.� fee.,OM, w.aaaan n[ro-ew..raw..- ....r,.e,v.n.ti want.. ,n...wI ..-,a,, r.. , 931061 45 EXHIBIT "A" Taxes for the year 1985, n lien, but no: ye: due or payable. E 1094 REC 02034592 12/04/85 16:11 $6.00 2/002 F OS47 MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN CLEAN 6 RECORDER WELD CO. CO Rights of way and enSements as now eata,liehed and used, including but not limited to roads, ditches, pipe lines, power lines, telephone lines and reservoirs. Right of way for COUNTY RCADS 30 feet side on eitter side of section and township lines as estebliahed by ORDER OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR WELD COUNTY, recorded OCTOBER 14, 1869 in ROOK 86 at PACE 277. Terme, conditions and pro'+iriona of LRECLEY-LUVELAND SHAREHOLDER'S DOMESTIC WATER AGREEMENT, recorded SEPTEMBER 10, I?'.3 in BOOK 4d9 as RECEPTION NO. 1416769. Terms, conditions, provisions and obligations Oi Lease Agreement between COLORADO LANDFILL, INC., A COLORADO CORPORATION ("COLORADO LANDFILL"). KEIRNES CORPORATION, A COLORADO CORPORATION ("PARENT"). AND BYRON KEIRNE5, AN INDIVIDUAL C'REIRNES " ), Lessors, and BROWNINC-FCtRIS INDUSTRIES OF COLORADO, INC., A COLORADO CORPORATION ("BFI"), L , recorded AUGUST 28, 1985 in BOOK 1082 as RECEPTION NO. 202256?. R Lion as contained in Patent recorded FEBRUARY 10, 1919 in BOOR 333 at PACE 12E, sv:J reservation being a. follows! Right of the proprietor of a vein Of 10de to extract and remove his ore therefrom should the same be fount to penetrate or intersect the premises. Right of way for ditches and canals constructed by the authority Of the United Scares. Mineral Deed from ROBERT RUSSELL and ELLEN RUSSELL to LOREN D. SWATHE and DOROTHY R. SWATHE Conveying AN UNDIVIDED 118 INTERES: IN AND Yo ALL OF THE OIL. CAS AND OTHER MINERALS IN AND UNDER AND THAT MAY BE PRODUCED FROM SAID LANDS recorded DECEMBER 5, 1956 in BOOK 1465 at PAGE 35. together with the right of ingress and egress at all times for the purpose of mining, drilling and exploring said lands for oil, gas, and ocher minerals and removing the same therefrom; and any interests therein, assignments or conveyances thereof. Reservation of AN UNDIVIDED 3/8 INTEREST IN AND TO ALL OIL, GAS AND OTHER MINERALS LOCATED IN, ON OR UNDER THE ABOVE DEEIR:BED PREMISES OR TPAT MAT BE PRODUCED AND SAVED THEREFROM as contained in instrument from ROBERT RUSSELL AND ELLEN RUSSELL recorded MARCH 2. 1964 in BOOK SOB as RECEPTION NO. 1..0617, and any interests therein, assignments, Or conveyances thereof. • Reservation of AN UNDIVIDED 1/4 INTEREST IN AND TO ALL OIL, GAS AND OTMElt MINERALS LOCATED IN, ON, OR UNDER THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PREMISES THAT MAY BE PRODUCED THEREFROM as ccntained in instrument true JOSEPH V. BROOCH, JR. recorded DECEMBER 20, 1965 in BOOK 556 as RECEPTION NO. 1478112, and any interests therein. assignments, or conveyances therer.f. Reservation of AN UNDIVIDED 1/4 INTEREST IN AND TO Al.!. OIS, GAS AND OTHER MINERALS LOCATED IN, ON OR UNDER TIC ABOVE DESCRIBED PREMISES THAT MAY BE PRODUCED THEREFROM an contained in instrument trom DOS RIOS, INC. recorded OCTOBER 21, :971 in 11QC'K 555 as RECEPTION NO. 1577336, and any interests therein, assignments, or conveyances thereof. Reservation of AN UNDIVIDED INTEREST IN AND 10 ALL OIL. GAS AND OTHER MIKUALS LOCATED IN, 0N, OR UNDER THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PREMISES THAT MY BE PRODUCED THEICFROM,NOT HERETOFORE RESERVED OR CC.:VEYED as contained in instrument from MOFFAT 6 SON, INC. recorded JANUARY 29, 1973 in BOOK 666 oil RECEPTION NO. 1606200, and any interests therein, assignments, or conveyances thereof. 061 aA 7, --out& Rafefit Attorneys At Law 1775 Sherman Street • Suite 1300 Denver, Colorado 80203 (303) 861-1963 • Fax: (303) 832-4465 Ext. 123 February 26, 1993 Ms. Connie Harbert, Chairperson Weld County Commissioners 915 - 10th St., P.O. Box 758 Greeley, Colorado 80632 VIAJAX: 1-352-0242 RE: Request for Rescheduling of March 24, 1993 Hearing Dear Chairperson Harbert: I have just learned that a public hearing has been set for March 24, 1993 on the Central Weld County Sanitary Landfill matter. The Ashton -Daniels Neighborhood Association has a vital interest in this matter and requested a hearing. Nevertheless, we were not contacted regarding the hearing date. I will be out of the United States traveling in Bolivia from March 20- 29, 1993, this being the spring break for my wife who is a teacher. The cost of the airline tickets was $2,000.00, and we purchased them in early January. tiV V MAR 0 1 1993 931061 a7- • • Ms. Connie Harbert February 26, 1993 Page Two In view of the circumstances, in order to allow the Ashton -Daniels Neighborhood Association to prepare for and participate in the hearing, we request that the hearing be rescheduled for an appropriate date in April. My secretary, Dee Trees, has my calendar and can coordinate the date with your staff and that of the County Attorney and the Landfill representatives. Sincerely, Gre _ : 'J. Ho c. s, Jr. for HOBBS, TROUT & RALEY, P.C. GJH/det c: • Weld County Commissioners • Mr. Tom David • Mr. Sam Tclep • Mr. Lee Morrison • Mr. Chuck Cualiffe • Mr. John Pickle • Ashton -Daniels Neighborhood Citizens T 931061 a l MAR -11-93 THU 13:51 HELD CO HEALTH DEPT • FAX NO. 3033564966 • P. 03 RS: TOt March 5, 1993 Glenn Mallory Solid Waste Program FROM* Laura E. Perrault Assistant Attorney v General Tat,* Dan Miller First Assistant Attorney General Central Weld Landfill -- Regulatory Interpretation Request of 6 CCR x007-2, 5 2.1,4 .._u ofamine MAR : p tg93 I 1225kgroad On Manageeztent December iof the Co orado Dtho epartment Materials and DDatp notified Waste Services w of Health COR ha completed its review of�seeralte on ( Waste documents) that CDM hby Waste Services regarding studies and a ni hnical documents submitted by for the surface eater, groundwater and Plans and results ll Central Weld Landfill. As a result of this re iviee gas w, CnH determined, termined, at the , in part, that* Central Weld Sanitary Landfill has contaminated the ground water. This is a violation of subsection 2.1.4 of the Regulations (6 CCR 1007-2]. The Regulations clearly state a site and facility operated as a sanitary utioPlease landfill shall prevent ease provide a correctivewater pollution. action plan which addresses the contamination issue's on and off site. Waste services has contested the application of section 2.1.4 to its operation of the landfill. CD8 has requested a written opinion of this issue. Araamenta Section 2.2.4 states* Asite andfill and facility operated as a sanitary di raeslialkarsane of ri„_ jax In nomannwg a h es doXS . t7 Mid MAR 11 '93 1349 SPat nil 68-11-HUll 3033564966 PACE.003 931061 .49 MAR -11-93 THU 13:51 WELDIIii HEALTH DEPT FAX NO. 3033564966 • P.04 shall proylds compacted fill material Drnvifle aAam,are .. _ h 1 la_Slit t2{i ail@ na� two . ___ des�.n.s Wray beili y3S4iY 9�yat ir nol ,ton; nod, u g f lied, shall be left in a condition po orderliness and good aesthetic appearance and capable of blending with the surrounding area. (emphasis added). Waste to the Central gold Services, objection n to the nos application or section 2.1.4 based on a slight mieunderstandin somewhatconvoluted ClO nand and e S r i be of which portion of section 3 1.4 is at S and Wasted oncea misinterpretation of this regulation by issue, and on a both Waste services and "adequate In a x'obrnary 2, 1993 memo, Waste Services focused on the "adeee ate cover" v " portisread on of s section 2.1.4. To its disadvantage, of a landfill must " portion as requiring that the operators and surface drains provide adequate cover, with suitable material aid sulfa a dr ge designated [sic) to D even} ing was basPaled, IIi. (emphasis added). Perhaps Waste Services, and wnoorreat, stated ton CDM,a hat section Z yes 21, 1992, letter, ick be operated to *prevent water pollution." Section 3 l�fhowo er, doss not containae drainage* mandate; rather, it srequires that "adequate savor" and " pollution." g prevent the pg2]t11ng of wa .+ and air Based on its incorrect reading of section 2.1.4, Waste Services' memo addressed a tangential and irrelevant issue whether an adequate cover and effective surface drainage alone can prevent groundwater contamination. Waste Services concluded that, because a number of other factors contribute to groundwater contamination, the 'mistimes of groundwater contamination beneath the site is not ill ,gag evidence designed or operated in violation" of that landfill has been 2.1.4. although Waste servicesportion of section that the existence of memo is correct in its assumption evidence that a landfill has a groundwater contamination or rabada surface not �Q its memo never addressed one of poor cover issues h re-- drama central weld landfill has en ads a `- whether age which prevents the gnats cover and t surface s drainage in violation of this portion n;water. Thus, Waste services may be portion of section 2.1.4.. • rtion Moreover, Waste Services may be in violation of another ddi;ess.cf section 2.1.4. which Section 2 2 4 also states Waste Services, memo does not operated to "minimise nuisance conditions." "t a landfill must be is defined under 6 CCR 1007-2, Naisancs conditions* frets - water pollution T " As '2 as "those which itmay out, tis definition makes no distinction +be CDR has pointed this pollution. Thus, CDR may assume between ground and surface water groundwater contamination exists that if a groundwater measurable amount hof e in the groundwater beneath the E0 'd MRR 11 '93 1350 9P:11 011L E8-11-UVW 3033564966 PRGE. 004 931061 30 MAR -11-93 THU 13:52 WELD CO HEALTH DEPT • FAX NO. 3033564966 • P.05 facility, the facility may not be operating in a to "'inhales nuisance Conditions. This may be due to tanner torhenlandfill does no e an adequate to acee dr inage, may be due to the measures. failure take certain other Waste In response to CDR's claim, during a phone conversation with Service's legal representative, Waste Services aoknovledged *nuisance nuisance conditions" maw result from groundwater pollution, and that groundwater pollutiondoes exist at the site. However, Waste Services claimed thatno actual this groundwater pollution because no one *nuisance" rasing, from affected by, this contaminated groundwater. presently using, or is Although this interpretation has some scintilla of merit, it is too narrow. According to found in Blacks LawDictionary, thea "nuisance* legal definition of "nuisance* occurred at this site. The dictionary didefines " probably nhaauisance already c"by act, or by failure to a legatos duty, )tintentionally tension° as �causing or permittiedition a legal i nju ik h4 a condition to exist which . The d ation t injuressit destroys or b defines private nuisance as "any (emphasis 9 t which Y vidualuo cot which persona or interfered with their of Glee individual or e a few • " (emphasis added). since le ul nee or enjoyment thereof . • flowing oft site and may be used bthis contaminated it groundwater the e public health and safety and, therefore' endangers nuisance. The contamination constitutes therefore, constitutes private nu a public well because it has deteriorated offsite private npropert as groundwater property. But oven assuming >i Q a fail per has not yet requirement. Arguably, Services may still lain to meet this is ulatory broader sance the term "nuisance conditions" is broader than ° uirance"i c." Section 1.1.4 does not mandate that an iolation of this be created rather, before CDf can find a company in state* that an operator must minimise "nuisance coditions. it clearly other words an operator must take steps to prevent the possibility of the creation of a nuisance. As CDR has pointed out, Waste Services bas failed to do this. Leaohate from the landfill has contaminated the groundwater and this Contaminated groundwater is flowing off site. gatadato Xn short, although CDR incorrectly stated that auction 2.1.4 requires a landfill operator "to prevent water pollution,* CDn legitimately conanuded that Waste Services' operation of the Central Weld Landfill appears to violate this Services can either refute this claim by showing that taken every can Comply neeessery to minimise ground water tb°t it has tabor it documents p y with CDR s request and draft a corrective plor an meet sdcn1,hat tether actions it plans to take in order to PO 'd MAR 11 '93 13:51 96:11 CHI E8 -11-}19U 3033564%6 PAGE. 005 931061 L/ • WELD COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MARSHALL H. ANDERSON HARRY S, ASHLEY GLENN K. BILLINGS OFFICE OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS July 21, 1971 Weld County Planning Commission County Services Building Greeley, Colorado PION[ (303) ]83.2212 LXT. 21. 22. AND 23 COURTHOUSE GREELEY. 8O031 Gentlemen: Please review the enclosed application form for a waste disposal site and return said application to our office as soon as possible. Thank you. Sincerely, The Board of County Commissioners Weld County, Colorado .I .911461 . APPLICATION OR COUNTY LICENSE FOR WAS0DISPOSAL SITE FEE $25.00 State nearb y towns Greeley, Colorado_ TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY, COLORADO The undersigned hereby makes application for County License for Waste Disposal site to be operated by applicant under supervision of the proper designated health authority and in accordance with all applicable laws, rules and regulations. .v4 4 4 - 1. Name of applicant t,1//=LQ -C'.0 O N 7-7-1/0/61 z -41/c-. FVod/V S- dba Location Des 'suss 01 gowns Address C.use Location Address ..tLo So rh-WAcj = b GG- wcrlirq.-L ••rfiAi }( c1 /fru( J • 6 L -if )v, - 2 /Pi /r4Lcr Al /24/ rrE:7v 3. State nearby water courses j2-- - 1 /7TL.6" -7H0 mad iv - 4. Type of facility (Sanitary Landfill or Compost plant, Incinerator, etc.) —t *'W'O - %/ L 4-- 5. Method of Supervision: S /i/PT. O IV S/T1•" 6. Is dump open to the public PF,S Hours 9304 #141 _ft(0cV. qtr SON - 7. Rates Q.S f/LLL-/), LL//TN- a. 0 M MIS S/tNITI'$ 8. Approval oaal of Health Department 9. Approval of Dieapprinl of Planning Commission .. � . STATE OS��jCj��l��. ��c��IL��.ii� nfif County of .2k2..K..:Le J}n. SEAL. Subscribed and sworn to before me this Peae t. Applicant r I. the undenirned being fine duly gore on oath, d&pdw and says: That I. the applicant above sassed: That has seed the above and (orgolnf` application end the aaswen sailt thereto. and well knows the newtons these, and that the d th an rude to e true int.a,esawnas tisane an forth ere to W. own knywiedn. - Apphran_j zed day of ..y 14:140 - �� riv re ,t lQ r /� 4ZLate- FL1 Prinz fire. 13, 17T1 Be epe��unw- Public COMMISSIONS:NS • • BEFORE THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Case No. SUP 116 Date O/^/71 APPLICATION OF Address 1eld County Lln•+fill, Inc. Earl Moffat, Cox .S9f, Evans, Colorado Moved by John Weigand that the following resolution be introduced for pas- sage by the Weld County Planning Commission: Be it Resolved by the Weld County Planning Commission that the application for reaPeAnccindR_......-.• ( DistakPICkq ' ( Ada:tti<etch~......-......SIIE...APrR.O.VA.............: of ..S.4.:`.IJIES,.Y....LAia.0 °LLL....... .......... .... covering the following described property in Weld County, Colorado, to -wit: The best -half of tire Seut!i':ast-quarter (L"':I'.;) and tr'n S',vtheast- ouartvr of the Southwest-orzarter (SVSW ) of Sor.tion Thirty-two (',C), Township Flint (E) jlnrth, Since Sixty-six (T6) Vest of the 6th P. 'i., Weld County. Colorado be recommended (favorably) (orefawoytb4gn) to the Board of County Commissioners for the following reasons: Compatible frith surrounding land U52 and zoninn Motion seconded by Ron.a.].d...N.e.i tmnn Vote: For Passages glen �.ndersen Against Passage: Ronald Reitman John '4 igand Philip Cowles John Uatson • The Chairman declared the Resolution passed and cordered that a certified copy be forwarded with the file of this case to the Board of County Commissioners for further proceedings. 1— P Z-005 931061 .4 • CERTIFICATION OF COPY I, ,..D,o.r,p.tby }1.1.1.1 , Recording Secretary of Weld County Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution is a true copy of Resolution of Planning Commission of Weld County, Colorado, adopted on iiU.g.v.S. r,...3., 1 .Z1, and recorded in Book No. ..... L.LL.. , Page No. , of the proceedings of said Planning Commission. PC -Z-006 Dated this . th day of Rawst , 19 7,). Recording Secretary, Weld County Planning Commission 7` 931061 35 WELD COUNTY LANDFILL INC. W3&, SW) and SE) , SW) Wagner E. Spomer Knister Do Rios nc. E. ome Knister A. Spomer King s Ri Inc. Shable E. Spomer King -7-- 931061 Elmer Knister Route 3, Box 426 Greeley, Coloardo 80631 Ann Spomer etal % Russell Billings First National Bank Building Greeley, Colorado 80631 Harold T. , C. Donald and Kenneth King % Pastor and Arthur Garcia Milliken, Colorado 80543 Dos Rios Inc. % First National Bank Trust Department Box 1058 Greeley, Coloardo 80631 Ella Spomer Route 1, Box 57 Milliken, Coloardo 80543 Henry Wagner Route 3 Greeley, Coloardo 80631 Guy A. Shable Route 1 Milliken, Coloardo 80543 1 931061 3 7 OLCHN N. OILLINGS. pit, 1, 00C IRY, OntroW, OOLO, MAOOLO W, ANOIfSON. L,1EuvmM ran., LM Or. I, /OONOTOWM. COLD. MAIinNALL M. ANOCRSON. •IiM u[O 2.N CT* AYE.. OMCCLCY. COLO. OFFICE OF THE WELD COUNT', PLANNING COMMISSION 7/29/71 To Whom It May Concern: RURMAN LORCN5ON COVMYV •Y..MMCR /4Onn .2031 333.1112 i011.. 27. 25 AMO 1C Your application for approval of a Waste Disposal Site will be reviewed before the Weld County Planning Commission on Tuesday, August 3, 1971 • _ 4 36 4th Floor Hearing Room, Court House at P. M. f1 E IEiccdtmgxckskaAdxexcxe Please be present or have a representative present. Sincerely, 4 J turman Lorenson Planning Director 921061 ,58 M 20' access easement across lots 12, 9, 6 and 3. Each would serve 3 lots. Mr. Lorenson read a letter from the Town of Ft. Lupton's town board and planning commission stating they have no objections to the proposed development, it also meets meets their Comprehensive Plan, Mr. Paul stated the Health Department has not received an application for septic system or percolation tests. Mr. Lorenson stated Ft. Lupton will be unable to supply water to this development. MOTION: By Mr. Heitman to approve the preliminary plat subject to approval of the Health Department and the forms being submitted. Second by Mr. Weigand. A vote of "Aye" by Anderson on the basis of Ft. Lupton's approval, Weigand, Heitman, Bowles. "Nay" by Watson. Motion carried. APPLICANTS: Foster & Schott Farms CASE NUMBER: S-91 tape 367 SUBJECT: Preliminary plat of Northwest Acres LOCATION: NWh Sec 32 T7 R67 APPEARANCE:, Mr. Foster, Mr. Schott, Gerald McRae DISCUSSION: Mr. Lorenson stated a drainage report has been submitted which was to have been evaluated by the County Engineer. App- lication has been made to the Health Department which has been approved. The subdivision design meets the requirements of the "A" zone. Mr. Foster is willing to work out a contract with North Weld Water District to serve the area. Mr. Lorenson stated this is counter to our developmental policy. He would like to have considered,a moratorium on subdivisions in the County for 90 days, until the "A" zone is completed and adopted and that the developmental standards for subdivisions be adopted and put in force. Mr. McRae stated he had a letter from the Lakely Lateral Company stating they will accept into the Lakely Lateral the drainage water as they have in the past as long as it comes in at selected points. Mr. Foster stated through a negotiated contract with the water company, they will install a storage tank and booster. MOTION: By Mr. Anderson to table this matter until Mr. Lorenson can check on the legality of a moratorium on subdivisions. Second by Mr. Watson. A vote of "Aye" by Anderson, Watson, Weigand, Bowles and Heitman. APPLICANT: Weld County Landfill, Inc. CASE NUMBER: SUP lit tape 367 SUBJECT: Site approval for landfill LOCATION: W1 SW: + SE; SW; Sec 32 15 R66 APPEARANCE: Earl Moffat DISCUSSION: Mr. Lorenson stated the land surrounding the site is compatible for a landfill. Mr. Paul stated the land is hilly. There was discussion regarding the legal description which was corrected. Mr. Moffat stated their present site at Evans is nearly exhausted. MOTION: By Mr. Heitman to take the matter under advisement. Second by Mr. Watson. A vote of "Aye" by Anderson, Watson, Weigand, Bowles and Heitman. Motion carried. RESOLUTION: '• Be it therefore resolved to recommend approval to the Board of County Commissioners subject to meeting the Health Department's requirements and the information being submitted to 8/3/71 670 // 931061 �9 • the State Health Department. Motion by Mr. Weigand, second by Mr. Heitman. A vote of "Aye" by Pnderson, Watson, Weigand, Bowles and Heitman. Motion carried. APPLICANT: David Fagerburg CASE NUMBER: S-90 tape 367 SUBJECT: Preliminary plat of Grand View Estates LOCATION: Pt Wi SW1/4 Sec 23 + pt E7 SE; Sac 23 16 RG6 APPEARANCE: Tom Collins DISCUSSION: Mr. Lorenson stated he has recommended a maximum of 20 lots averaging 21 acres each and development in tract "A' be restricted and a letter from the Ogilvy Ditch Company in- dicating any easement requirement.e t: rho• lake. A letter from the Soil Conservation Service was read, indicating there could be problems with septic tanks during the irrigating seann. Mr. Lorenson had suggested the developers develop some kind of of underground drainage system to drain the water table to a lower level. They have indicated that if this is a requirement, they will proceed with this plan. The application for approval of septic tank systems has been approved by Glen Paul. Mr. Ewing stated the realignment of the road proposed by the developers would eliminate a traffic problem that now e.:ists. Mr. Lorensoe stated if the preliminary plat is approved, the drainage study would be made before the final plat is approved. The City of Greeley has indicated they would not be able to serve this area 'with water or sewer in the near future. MOTION: By Mr. Watson to approve the preliminary plat subject to the approval of the drainage study on the final plat. Seconc ee Mr. Weigand. A vote of "Aye" by Watson, Weigand, Bowies and Heitman. "Nay" by Anderson. Motion carried. SUBJECT: Amendment to "A" zone regarding gas installations DISCUSSION: Mr. Ewing presented his p:oposed amendment regarding ea: installations along the County Right -of -Way. Stated the key word in the amendment is"production". The set -back requirement would be 300 feet from any R/W and 330 feet from any section line One advantage would be safety. The Highway Dept. stated it would be an advantage them in in aquirine right-of-way. Mr. Ewing stated they would like to eliminate the loading and unloading of trucks on the highway. Mr. Robert Houtchens, representirg tit. Greeley Gas Company, recommended that the companies supplying gas should be expressly eliminated. Setting t e lines back 300 reet would create quite a hardship. Walker eitier, representing the Panhandle Western Gas Company, stated they are willing to work out reasonable regulations. Felt the proposed set -back would be a hardship on the companies,, also the land owners. Mr. Bowles stated no structure, according to the present regulations, is allowed less than 50 feet from the right-of-way. Asked if the 50 feet set -back would be agreeable. Mr. Bart Giles of Amico Corporation stated they have been drilling in Weld County during the past year. They felt 300 feet is a little extreme. If there proposed set -backs become a regulation, they felt there shoula Le some exceptions, especially where they would interfer with sprinklers. Mr. Bowles stated he thought some of the metering stations in the past have been set too close to the road, caue:,; traffic problems. Mr. Ray Fouts with the Greeley Gas Compa::y, stated they are more concerned with farm taps. They come off o, the transmission line, set a meter at the fence line and then run 8/3/71 671 934.1. AM ISSUE CERTIFICATE NUMBER 26 SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL SITE - W2LD COUNTY LANDFILL RANGE 66, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, SECTION 32: WiS'Ne 8 SE4SWi: BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of County Commissioners, Weld'County, Colorado, that in accordance with provisions of the Colorado Waste Disposal Site and Facilities Act, Chapter 358, Colorado Session Laws of 1967, the Board hereby grants to Earl Moffat dba Sanitary Landfill, Certificate Number 26. The above and foregoing resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote: AYE : NAY AYE DATED: OCTOBER 6, 1971 • 'pc/ THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO MB 37: LHR 187 931061 7 S3IZ CREEL %gaunt ,a,ling laws of NOTICE State of Col°moo' a puke` held in the Pursuant to the zoning laws of ye State of Colorado, a public taring will be held in the Office fiweld CowlY C°� t the elms apeo' f the Board of County Commis -flay, Color p,*eV oaers of Weld County. Colorado • ified- AU PE" Ong 1° any val I eld County Court House, Gree• 11 in the aft/ aPPr° y. Colorado, at the •time spec- ; are requested�tto attend and may ied, All persons in any manner be heard. terested in the Site Approval Iwary No. so 'e requested to attend and may ` Ly,d1U1. Inc heard. Weld County DOCIaT No. '54 Weld County Landfill, Inc Box 590 Evans, Colorado DATE: September 22, 1971 IME: 2:00 O'clock P. M. equest: Slte'Approval for a Mary Landfill." . e West -half tithe Southwest uarter (W4 SW:r)' and the utheast Qusrterrof the South- st Quarter '(SE% SW's) of 'on Thlrtytwo (52), Town- i ip Five (5), North, Range ixtyslx (66) Went of the eth ' M., Weld County, Colorado. ated: August 18, 1911 THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ELO COUNTY, COLORADO By: ANN SPOMER COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER AND CLERK TO THE BOARb Lshed in The Greeley Boos- ugust 20 and September 10, Brig f the vrjll mot County Commis-, loners of Weld County, Colorado I Rouse Gree• , RE Th.�Sot Sec Six ATEDs Box 596 ICE Evans, Colorado ' b£ the State of Colorado, a public DATE: September 22. t971 1)ffice of the Board of County TIME: 2:00 O'clock R. Ai. urt House, Greeley, Colorado, at Request: Site Approval for aeons in any manner interested in `eel to attend and may be heard. Sanitary Landfill. The west -half cf the Southwest et turf SW%) and the Southeast Quarter ° sewai of WELD COUNTY LANDFILL, INC. west quarter t�E Town• BOX 596 1 Thtrty'two (�1• e Section north. Brag EVANS, COLORADO ship F' (5)the stA D Sixty six (66) West of Colorado. M., Weld County. C Dated: August 18. 1971 THE BOARD OF COUNTY co misstoNERS t A SANITARY LANDFILL WELD COUNTY. COLORADO 1 By: ANN SPOMER COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER AND CLERK TO THE BOARD {I1 I \est Quarter (WSW}) and the uthwest Quarter (SE*SWI) of �vnship Five (S) North, Range th P. M., Weld County, Colorado. t Al ter August 20 annin d SeP lr 0' 1971 1 THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Publish in the Greeley Booster August 20 3 September 10, 1971 Bits ANN SPOMER COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER AND CLERK TO THE BOARD 1<. 931061 442 • :Caw 'Office S Gl.S` RECa",VED SEP22 1971 KAROWSKY, COWER & OLDENBURG A.M. ►.M. .. 8171819110111112111$1 M 1O1! CHARLES A. KAMOWS,C/ STOW L. WITTIER. JR. R. SAM CLOtnSVRO September 22, 1971 Weld County Commissioners Weld County Courthouse Greeley, Colorado 80631 Gentlemen; SLOTS 3,5. !T. AND •T. SVIUDINO ORSRSY. COLORADO SOS 31 ARSA aeos *0* usa,., It has come to the attention of certain residents of Dos Rios. Inc. , a Subdivision of Weld County, Colorado, that a Hearing is to be held today before you concerning the Application of Weld County Land Fill, Ins. , for a Special Use Permit in connection with the West !fall of the Southwest Quarter and the Southeast Quarter of the South- west Quarter of Section 32, Township 5 North, Range 66 West of the 6th P.M. Evidently the Application is to obtain permission to use the land above described for a Sanitary Land Fill. Dos Rios Subdivision lies adjacent to the above described land, but for reasons which the residents cannot explain, they were totally unaware of the fact that an application had been made for the purpose described above and that the Planning Commission has apparently acted on the Application favorably. To the best of my knowledge from the information available, no individual resident of Dos Rios has ever received a Notice of any kind concerning the Application. I think it is necessary to bring to your attention that under the Official Zoning Re- solution of Weld County under Section III, Paragraph 3.3 (2) concerns itself with land fills and indicates the necessity for a Special Use Permit. Procedural Guide adopted by the County effective March 15, 1971, provides in Paragraph (1) (g) the Application must be signed by the Fee Owner. The Fee Owner in this instance is Dos Rios, Inc. and I am advised that Dos Rios, Inc. has no': signed said Application. It would therefore appear that the Board of County Commissio',ors is without juris- diction to consider the Application or to grant it. It is the intention of the residents to attack the validity of the Permit if it should be granted. By way of general information, the residents of Dos Rios feel badly imposed upon in view of the fact that of fairly recent date they have been burdened with the proxi- mity of Monfort's new feedlot and the Hill 'N Park sewage lagoon. Adoption of the -r 931061 43 4, Mr. Bowles called the meeting to order. SUBJECT: Land Fill DISCUSSION: Mr. Lorenson stated a d been raccived from Mr. Karowsky stating there are .;:c procedures, one is by the County Commissioners which is a County 1 cans e for Waste Disposal site and one is an a;N'. icction for a Special Use Permit which the Planning Comm scion ..;quire& applicant to complete which is in that catagc::y. ::e asked which one he is to use. Mr. Karowsky felt ur application to the Planning Commission should have been used in the case of a sanitary land fill applied for by Earl :orfat, who is not the over of the property in question. Planing Commission application re- quires the notarized signature of the owner or authorize agent of the property. It was agreed Py the Planning Commission that an application for a sanitary :andvili should go through the procedures required of other Special Use Permits. SUBJECT: Road'contract for Wi.1OWoad Subdivision DISCUSSION: Mr. Lorenson stated a . at torn letter from john �o4'tCiie.'•�, a�tOr:: for Willowood Subdivision., regarding a subdivision improvement agreement rather than bonding. This would be an agreement to take care of the curb, .gutter. sidewalks and street improvements; Mr. Anderson stated this is ail :.A approved iodn and they need a bonafide contract for the improvements. Mr. Lorenson read the proposed contract. Matter refered to Mr. Telcp. SUBJECT: Agricultural council DISCUSSION: Mr. Lorenson stated ha dd met with the Agricultural Council They would like to d scups the make-up of the-Plan;ii" Commission, and were told on the approval or the Planning Com- mission, they could attend a Planning Commission meeting and discuss their problems. Mr. Anderson suggested a copy of the proposed "A" zoning amendment be sent to the members of the council. SUBJECT: Comprehensive Plan - progress report DISCUSSION: Mr. Lorenson reported the consultant has begun on the housing study in both Counties. The Planning Commission, has provided a good bit of information and he is now waiting for census tapes. Jim Ohi and the two interns will start iiousin ins>ectionS. Reports will be submitted to each community on how they are to handle their housing problem. Some meetings be scheduled with F.H.A. They know likely sources for funds housing in the smaller communities. An analysis has been nu all subdivisions, showing the amount of acreage, the number - parcels, average size etc. This type of information is bei quired by the state Land Use Commission. Meeting adjourned. _. APPLICANT: Weld County Landfill, Inc. � V iV CASE NUMBER: SUP #116 RESOLUTION: By Board of County Commissioners to grant the site approval. Dated 10/6/71 _ __ Respectfully submitted, 1. Dorothy hill, See. 921061 4W 0 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the foregoing documents, was placed in the United States mail, postage prepaid, addressed to the following property owners. DATED this �� DON HOFF ATTORNEY AT LAW 1025 9TH AVENUE, SUITE 1/309 GREELEY, CO 80631 WALKER MILLER ATTORNEY AT LAW 822 7TH STREET GREELEY, CO 80631 day of Deput Clerk to the Board . 1993. f 931061 45 • Waste Services Corporation 603? 77th Avenue Greeley. Colorado 80634 303/330-2641 March 18, 1993 c' Barbara Taylor, Environmental Engineer Colorado Department of Health Water Quality Control Section WQCD-PE-B2 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South Denver CO 80222-1530 A Waste Management Con,canv Re: FOURTH QUARTER FRENCH DRAIN MONITORING RESULTS AT CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL (CWSL) Dear Ms. Taylor: Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, under its own initiative, is currently conducting quarterly monitoring for the flow of water from the french drain into the onsite retention pond. The intent of this program is to compile background water quality data that would reflect seasonal activities occurring around the landfill, such as pesticide and fertilizer use related to agricultural activities. Enclosed for your review is the fourth quarter 1992 analytical report for the french drain at CWSL. This data is intended to provide additional information on the quality of water from the french drain in consideration of CDH's review of the Colorado Discharge Permit Application. The sample was taken at the outfall of the french drain on December 17, 1992. The analysis was performed by the Waste Management, Inc. Environmental Monitoring Laboratory (EML). The enclosed monitoring data is in addition to previous sampling events conducted on March 28, 1992 as part of the site hydrogeologic investigation and additional sampling which was performed on July 16, 1992. The results of these first two sampling events are included in the Colorado Discharge Permit Application submitted to the Colorado Department of Health (CDH) on January 7, 1993 for the french drain at CWSL. The report is comprised of the Data Qualifier Report, Fourth Quarter Analytical Data and Chain of Custody and Field Information Forms. wp5twVeact.031593C.c* P: CWSL 3.1 a 4.11.2 fray file) Geh,64 S 921061 Letter Barbara Taylor March 18, 1993 Page 2 CWSL would greatly appreciate your expeditious review of the frenchdrain permit application. Please contact Bill Hedberg at 654-1133 or Alan Scheere at 770-3324 if we can be of any assistance. Sincerely Bill Hedberg Division V.P. Landfill Operations QuAA Alan Scheere Environmental Specialist cc: Roger Doak, CDH w/enc John Pickle, WCDH w/enc Lee Morrison, Assistant County Attorney w/o enc Chuck Cunliffe, Weld County Department of Planning w/o enc Weld County Commissioners: Constance Harbert, Chairman w/o enc Bill Webster, w/o enc Dale Hall, w/o enc George Baxter, w/o enc Barbara ICirlaneyer, w/o enc vpS1 u\ 4g01293a.ad1 P: CW91, 3,1 & 4,11.2 (new 6k) 931061 ^J 'mil • • Letter Barbara Taylor March 18, 1993 Page 3 bcc: Len Butler Tom Schweitzer Tom Buchholz Bruce Clabaugh Marian King Bill Jeffry Bob Damico Brad Keirnes File wp51w\SW 03159712.c® A: CWJL 3.1 it 4.11.2 (ma Poo) S 931061 3 n • (1. March 18,• 159 Ms. Constance Harbert, Chairwoman Weld County Commissioners Centennial Center 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Ms. Harbert: I am in receipt of a letter dated March 10, 1993, to the Commissioners regarding CWSL from Ella Marie Hayes and Susanne Stephens. Last week, they asked to come and visit about CWSL. In our conversation we agreed the only real issue is the environmental impact. They said several times that they felt Waste Management Inc. had the funds to clean up the site. At each such statement, I agreed, but said Waste Management Inc. was 9bliaated to the environment and to clean up whether they closed tomorrow 9r in a decade. I asked how could we as caretakers of this land support another decade of pollution? The missing link, I believe, is in paragraph four: "We are trying to work with the landfill operators to allow them a reasonable amount of land around the facility." Money talks! Even Waste Management Inc. gives the Big Thompson as the recipient of their discharge. We own property on, both sides of the road before the Big Thompson. How is the water to get there and not go through our property? What of landowners who take water out of the Evans ditch? In addition to the drainage to the Big Thompson, each year, a few weeks after irrigation starts above us to the north, a spring breaks out in our corn fields. This water comes from underground aquifers. The spring dries up each winter. Attached is a letter from a resident and geologist regarding the underground "piping" in our area. As ever, our biggest concern is the water, the Big Thompson, the South Platte, the Evans ditch and our own irrigation ditches and the surrounding soil. SoielYtto 92,1!061 • 2 Will this be another Globeville? How do we know the impact of children playing, livestock drinking, crops absorbing, and wildlife feasting in the fields that have been irrigated? The Daniels have trusted our state and county since the 1860s; we know they would not allow any "premature closure" (paragraph 4). We trust it will close very shortly, but we know they will do their job to make sure Waste Management Inc. adheres to proper environmental closure plans and accept their long-range responsibility for the environment. Sincerely, Madeline Daniels 23732 WCR 27h Milliken, CO 80543 339-0629 cc: Governor Romer Ms. Gale Norton Mr. T. Monahan Ms. Laura E. Perrault Mr. Dan Miller Dr. Patricia Nolan Ms. Barbara Taylor Ms. Patricia Nelson Mr. Victor Sainz Mr. David Shelton Mr. John Pickle Mr. William Webster Mr. George Baxter Ms. Barbara Kirkmeyer Mr. Dale Hall 931061 Q • • November 10, 1992 Mr. Olen Mallory Program Manager Solid and Hazardous Waste Division Colorado Department of Health 4300 Cherry Creek Drive_South Denver, CO 80222-1530 Dear Mr. Mallory: As a concerned citizen and landowner I am taking this opportunity to comment on your agency's proposed solid waste regulations scheduled to be taken before the Colorado State Board of Health in a hearing for adoption on November 18. 1992. After review of the draft regulations provided to me by Austin Buckingham of your office and comparing them to the Environmental Protection Agency's Solid Waste Disposal Facility Criteria; Final Rule (published in the October 9. 1991 edition of the Federal Register) and the solid waste regulations developed and adopted by the State of New Mexico (filed December 31, 1991) in compliance with EPA's ruling I am suggesting some additional language for inclusion in your proposed regulations. Under section 3 - Standards for Solid Waste Disposal Landfill Sites and Facilities of the proposed Regulations Pertaining To Solid Waste Disposal Sites And Facilities is subsection 3.1 - Location Restrictions And Site Standards. The State of New Mexico's Solid Waste Management Regulations contain the comparable section : Part III - Maximum Size Of Facility and subsection : 302 - Siting Criteria For Landfills (both attached). I direct your attention to 302(A)(2) which states no landfill shall be located "where depth to seasonal high water table will be closer than 100 feet to the bottom of the fill". I suggest that the proposed Colorado regulations contain a similar depth to groundwater provision under subsection 3.1. Such a provision would serve to strengthen your 3.1.11 clause in the protection of groundwater from contamination. My property is located in Weld County less then a quarter of a mile from the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. I am concerned about groundwater contamination resulting from solid waste burial in that landfill. I am a trained geologist and I can assure you that sink holes and the geologic phenomenon known as piping are prevalent in the clayey formations that exist in that area. Piping can tansport water subsurface both horizontally and vertically as rapidly as water can flow through a plastic pipe. As I grew up there I witnessed this phenomenon numerous times and am confident I could provide evidence of piping occuring on my property at any time of the year. It has been brought to my attention that solid waste has been buried at the landfill site in 6 feet of water at times. This does not surprise me as I have groundwater fed springs on my property that flow all year and serve as watering holes for my livestock and an abundance of natural wildlife. The groundwater table is quite shallow (close to the surface) and contamination of area groundwater through subsurface migration through buried waste at the landfill is 931061 3 • NEW MEXICO SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT REGULATIONS SOLID WASTE BUREAU New Mexico Environment Department 931061 es i9otss Vol. 89 No. 9 E 7E. 0.... 1 gist eLP-a--Ail ruin °o F,p'ruza e.6' o u 3UL'QQ '288'8 g- ilfr A y a.S <b ,oad,> Amp 0=V8&g 5 r4 w So -x°q eo18`= �� oa °n4oa .0as.,.,., O.9,,,!3 aiza c torAmt!,.. =. ¢,a A ro o c'f g a V z '$°ap'e'x �8^ph. 5vu�e� °.�� a � CL CIL.'o y� UO.1yCu'd'.-Z8 dr o'Ller.McN � AO _ 0 Q S 0..g l CO 'A t. c.a3. oa � a77 u g .. o oa• g.e : ,32 <0 °oa �■ a■■ °° ffi y'� a�2°a'5�a � 61�°,°'c � a� :°t3,c t�' 90 3,1? ud.9�r+-3'' me 0.'a� °a N•y�°" mA° d"imau��u , 'r'°� ,��C a °..oA.d;paa°3 C h. A t244Ab 464.4 1.4 11141 it _g �-• c ii a s *,'c :386 Cua•2°gav °.a.°�'v`'h".bmc omaamae`N?' °'aaa° $�'3�5 tale' ■� 3P 3 aas a $v Q.q - .�':',2-`. •• atin ° •w O«.°. 7 c.A o°t3 p8�° d ay- m2w9c�ip0.c o°� Ll .�'u�ai 2 `t�`�l'L C CD lilt., O.f l b•A3 ?, a wp+'V °�.«G 8° N u a�di E24£..t CO.C ��L'o'p~O8 bas Ari Q ° y _ _ HH p y p y ,q ? r m d �j` C a Ri NOM a)% �-7 2714 A a) u a O a 4 y ty p a N p 'd3 C y' •A C 4 g M m '�,. G t e'° �G u A jc a �ci 0 CZ� .e5ur`30,11, QAoa°'r'$vo `" o$m_ thli °'3 fl—. !68� '�'.9 Y'i'c'r�'acnFx.3A° cd� "gyp `°^.�. Y3 �i .h e$`°b•, .,.'9s..E`"a'-O� °I a r .� 'a8� �a'i•-�a°°g,°'�oCg+py eo.a"..— pdhmu u : ��oaa°''b'800 OFer�!g Yi`�,� w�`�`°y pd ?c°'. '� C' d� „i'i4 a ga.8.lo 9:�Mallig'' .8:'iCas Pi ail 931061 NEW MEXICO SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT REGULATIONS SOLID WASTE BUREAU New Mexico Environment Department 931061 establishment of the priority list. D. The interim status of any solid waste facility granted by Subsection A.1 or B.3 of this section: 1. shall automatically terminate upon: a. final closure, if accomplished prior to the issuance of a permit; b. suspension of operation for more than one year; c. the failure of the owner or operator to submit the results of a preliminary site assessment in accordance with Subsection B.3.b of this section if applicable; or d. the Secretary's final order on a permit application; and 2. may be revoked or suspended for violation of an applicable provision of these regulations in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Department's Rules Governing Appeals from Compliance Orders; provided that for purposes of the Department's Rules Governing Appeals from Compliance Orders, interim status shall be deemed to be a permit. E. The operator of any solid waste facility operating under interim status shall comply with all applicable provisions of Part IV of these regulations. PART XXX MAXIMUM SIZE OF FACILITY; SITING CRITERIA 301. MAXIMUM SIZE. The Secretary shall not issue a permit for any active solid waste facility larger than fivehundred acres. 302. SITING CRITERIA FOR LANDFILLS. -- A. Except as otherwise provided in Subsection B of this section, no landfill shall be located in the following areas: 1. floodplains, within 500 feet of wetlands, or 200 feet of watercourses; 2. where depth to seasonal high water table will be closer than 100 feet to the bottom of the fill; 3. where subsurface mines are considered to be a problem as defined by New Mexico Department of Energy, Minerals and Natural Resources, or in an area subject to sink holes; 4. within 200 feet of a fault that has had a unlesscallnpollutiionHccontrol structures, includ:.ngllinersyears), arecdesignedltotresiststhesmaximumuhorizontalracceleratl iontin lithified material for the site; 5. within historically or archaeologically significant sites unless in compliance with Cultural Properties Act, Sections 18-6-1 to 18-6-23 NMSA 1978 and the Prehistoric and Historic Sites Preservation Act, Sections 18-8-1 to 18-8-8 NMSA 1978; 6. within 1,000 feet of public water supply well or EIB/SWMR-3 37 921061 4 T90Tt6 a NCI v O Um M as R aim im = • 4 .7. ; 12 g la '� 3 1761 .�i $ o•iL7 as c� u M 12 o Iri FS• �mo Hai�dd coQi';d10 Tfl .mo 6b St 1-•,90.m q c es 3ig tv� 0.77,:. „&,4 Y. _°4 oa5 Q� .v� a d atAB. ix o� i§v oGo�' ,5p•-1°`�d A3°ou��cro �.,bo�a.� x$� 8 '3 °�35 rs^a aoX S . -Ia o �. .�.� �$ • a oa� .aEpy'do��i"3��a w — .y g,_a u� Qo2o gte,oab o"$o �u8 a" ° `a�u,�� g Lao .a 931061 .8..::aGN o ab �! N• P'$ N '�ax?.,�a OOH. ISEg`S,��llg gBME.�'A4 b� F-4=off-„ate• ra s, o'Caa0? °� ~000c0.ti ...w'i'.» ',owelj t.5aygabg a�tfa8 e8 w.8 a>paioi° ii•s vN 0-n-. W� may 7f a Q. ocli 88tH �13.9•��vW89'a5a� •9 •n5cS•9'33�� 'tl'�, a�iaB�A a Breeze, March 11, 1993 •SpeSal waste plan loOkt from county Hearing set The Weld County Cora. ns 540nps gave act a probable cause bearing tot April 5 to consider issues.: regarding the Central Weld Landfill, The hearing beglne at 9 sm in the commisaioncn' - hearing room,.. at the Centennial Center in downtown Greeley. Weld County Director at: Planning Chuck Cunitnc said: county officials will -present testimony regarding a variety of violations they allege they've dis- covered at the.. facility. Among.. those charges is that . waste disposal at the.:site has con- taminated the groundwater and that the facility 6 lacking several. necessary eralta. - -Re res- entatives of Waste Services Corp.,' owners of thelandfill, will also. have the -chance to resenttheir own testimony. Public comment will also be solicited, It probablecause is determined, a show causehearing could be set to consider revocation of the landfill's permit of operation. by Matt Lubich The Weld County Health Department has not been given the chance to review a copy of a "special waste plan" that the State Health Department approved in December for Waste Services Corp. sites in the region, including the Central Weld Landfill. According to Glenn Mallory, state section chief for solid waste, the company asked the CDE to limit access to the plan because it contains "pro- prietary information." Simply put, Mallory said, the company asked it be kept confidential because it details "trade se- crets." But that confidentiality has seemingly even extended to local environmental health officials. c6 a 7.ryKrr o o P$�Q R 3 x d r. .t To m to ~b S� Ag ,1I :-.C.carei 0 O N of m ro W r1 o'? . E P. i) • • ;1*0eoN ", -o' `°m°C'mi E N�*oo_.O ' _h_t 0 Fr otz as av n l a m g z ,; 7K F a? r u roe- 4 .-.w .F'-. 0. sr ace on°a °am" -,w , 7 LI a 7 7=mb'm oommaa a 5^'�- CD mit Y! O vd 5,0 CN6e o=a3 ...911. c^y m B R-sonezw N o a W rl m 0 t.;" 4 /� - a ao. g ore=a't7., °o 020. pm eo c r• 2 n aR • a n 1 ° N,° W ° 0a 6 n n W^ N N o'o " a " °' a a� a 8, s a rvrv°'c_v ' L?Q .7 Q. �' - m N n `. ran m O 0 .nd F, g an ad° o7'^o �•c n5'^'T `� e-3 m ii.'a ,.fr d Qo' S -04 '04 i'D h n O a s G _a ts m•c oo CO m o John Pickle, head of the county environmental protec- tion division, said that in the course of his office's work it became apparent that they had never received a copy of the plan. Special waste plans detail how facilities intend to deal with wastes such as petroleum contaminated soil and other materials that they are allowed to accept, but which may require specific and additional procedures. "The state has already review- ed it and approved it? Pickle said, "but it seems to me that we should have the right to review it too," Pickle said his office did receive a Copy of a draft of the plan, dated Febru- ary of 1992, but he believes the document approved this winter may contain substantial chan- READER=OPINIONS' .µ Landfill issues To The Tribune: Our water supply is fmite. We take it for granted. Almost 70 percent of the planet is covered by water with only 3 percent of it being fresh water held in streams, rivers, lakes, underground aquifers or frozen in glaciers and icc caps. tfwe jiet- --dsib'tefettittg'rothe"Big171ompson and South Platte Rivers located south of Greeley. A mega -giant company called Waste Management owns and operates the Central Weld Landfill only one-fourth mile away from the Big Thompson River. So far there are 21 years of trash leaking its contaminants down the hillside to the most susceptible source of fresh water. T1ts Location of tldi dugsp'tr rinigatlon water surges' through and"arSid the landfill in summer and it's located in the middle of a natural drainage area. Keeping this landfill in oper- ation only compounds the problem. Even the fill dirt used as part of daily cover is petrole- um -contaminated and they truck it in day after day. Just where do you think all of these volatile organic compounds arc going? Eventually they end up in the water. ges. With the variety of other issues currently facing him and the county regarding the CWSL site, he said, he has not had time to pursue the issue. Waste Service Vice -President for Landfill Operations Bill Hedberg said he wasn't aware of any issues regarding the limited access question. The plan, he said, is an attempt by the company to conform with impending new state regula- tions that will come in under what is known as Subtitle D. The plan has only been dis- tributed to the state, he said, pending final drafting and implementation of those regulations. When that occurs, Hedberg said, the plan will be dis- tributed to all agencies. Mallory said Thesday that he had just received a letter from the State Attorney General's Office requesting that he contact the company and ask them to substantiate why the information should be con- sidered proprietary. Please protect our natural resources. It's easy to be complacent with an out -of -sight, out -of -mind attitude. But our waters won't take care of themselves. We want the area cleaned up and the landfill closed. There is a hearing regarding the continued operation of this landfill on at 9 a.m. April 5 at the Centennial Building. Please get involved. I hope our county commissioners have done their homework and ere ethically bound to truly do what is right for the com- munity, not what they may be enticed to do by a large company with lots of money. Ann Hayes Greeley 931061 pc: WIADERN INTERNATIONAL MUSICS. 3707 65th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80634-9626 U.S.A. 303-330-6901 FAX: 303-330-7733 March 6, 1993 Dr. Patricia A. Nolan, Executive Director Colorado Department of Health 4300 Cherry Creek South Denver, CO 80222 Dear Dr. Nolan: As a member of the Ashton -Daniels Neighborhood Association I have a particular interest in recent activities relating to the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. I understand you have kept an open line of communication with various individuals and officials wanting answers on this issue —a welcome attribute. There are three points I wish to make, and I would appreciate your response as soon as possible. First of all, I would like to know why the CWSL owners have been allowed to operate an unlined facility since 1971, dumping heavy metals, petroleum -contaminated soil, alleged radio -active material and pesticides, asbestos, sludge, and other toxins into 5 to 25 feet of standing water, draining into now -dead lakes, into an irrigation ditch and thence to the Big Thompson River, a source of irrigation water for the City of Evans? How can a site like this not be an insidious threat to the environs by creating tremendous health problems to the crops, animals and to humans? Would the Health Department personnel— or our legislating officials —savor living in such an environment? Secondly, the State Health Department will not allow any County officials to view a Special Waste Permit, stating that they have to protect the "trade secrets" of Waste Management. How can this be a reason for secrecy, and why is the Department concerned with protecting what is known as "the largest waste -hauling and disposal firm in the world"? Thirdly, the so-called Fact Sheet reads as though it were written directly by Waste Management itself; to the private citizen this looks like a direct conflict of interest . Two week -ends ago Waste Management was passing out this same Fact Sheet in their public relations booth at the Greeley Mall. Who, indeed, did compose this Sheet? Thank you for your attention: I look forward to your response to these issues. urs truly, Sharon I55avis� Governor Roy Romer Senator Hank Brown Representative Wayne Allard State Representative Dave Owen Weld County Commissioners John Pickle, Weld County Dept. of Health Chuck Cunliffe, Weld County Department of Planning Services Richard Evans, City Manager 91; LOaoic,StrcA 931061 March 1993 "NEW AND IMPROVED" FACT SHEET ✓ CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL Questions and Answers Compiled by The Ashton -Daniels Neighborhood Association This question and answer FACT SHEET is in response to a "fact sheet" dealing with these same questions and answers distributed by the Colorado Department of Health (CDH) to the public concerned about the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill (CWSL), known locally as the Greeley - Milliken Landfill. That "public" comprises the citizens truly concerned about their environment — their rivers, soil and water near the Landfill. These are citizens who want questions answered frankly and truthfully. Q. Is the landfill regulated? A. CWSL has never filed a complete Design and Operation Plan in its 21 years of existence.-) A discharge drain flows into Spomer Lakes from the landfill. The odor flowing from the landfill into Spomer Lakes and through the irrigation ditches violates 6 CCR 1007-2.1.1 of the Minimum Standard. CWSL has never, in its 21 years, had a discharge permit (NPDES)—a violation of 6 CCR 1007 2.1.2. The facility is trying to expand vertically. If allowed, the facility would not blend into the surrounding area when closed: violation of 6 CCR 1007-2.1.4 (Minimum Standards). A number one requirement of a landfill is that it "be dry and stay dry".2) However, this landfill, located in a major drainage area 1/4 mile from the Big Thompson River, is wet and it stays wet! Q. Has the Landfill contaminated the ground water? A. Yes, CWSL admitted to the contamination from its lab tests?) And, according to Glenn Mallory and Roger Doak of CDH, in a letter to CWSL on Dec. 23, 1993, they have. Also, as late as Feb. 22, 1993, the Weld County Health Department (WCHD) confirmed the existence of contamination in a memorandum to Chuck Cunliffe, Weld County Department of Planning Services. Q. What about the milky color and the odor of Spomer Lakes? A. The lakes were full of fish, crystal clear and odor free until the landfill began operation. By the mid -seventies, according to witnesses, the lakes turned white and all of the fish died. If this were a natural occurrence the lakes would have been milky white and odoriferous before 1971. 1) Austin Buckingham, CDH, in a letter to Attorney Kent Hanson Sept. 18, 1992, and on her inspection of the landfill, Oct. 12, 1992. 2) Paul Paulson, CDH, in an audiotape, siting the Ault Landfill. 3) "Hydrogeologic and Geotechnical Characterization Report' from Golder Associates, July 1992. 931O61 • i Q. Is the landfill responsible for the condition of Spomer Lakes? A. Yes it is, according to results of private lab testing and eye -witness accounts of the lakes' history. Q. Why would you give the landfill a permit to discharge wafter to Spomer Lakes when the lakes appear polluted? A. When private lab tests revealing heavy metals are available, and odor, visible pollution and VOC's (volatile organic compounds) are present, it would seem inconceivable that CDH could even think of allowing this pollution to go through private lands, irrigation systems and into the Big Thompson, Evans Ditch and ultimately the South Platte. Q. Isn't the ground and surface water contaminated by heavy metals? A. Yes, as confirmed by private lab tests submitted by citizens to CDH. CDH has relied on the landfill to do its own testing since the State claims to have no available funds for this purpose. Q. Will private wells in the area be tested? A. Good question! There has been talk of this since July or August of 1992, but as yet the neighboring landowners have not been contacted about any specific intentions. Q. Has the landfill submitted engineering and operation plans? A. No complete Design and Operations Plan has been submitted during its 21 -year history, according to a memo to Chuck Cunliffe Feb. 22, 1993 from WCH, thus violating C.R.S. 30-20- 103. Q. Is the landfill in the water table, and isn't this illegal? A. Yes; in a letter dated Dec. 21, 1992 to CWSL, CDH states: "Solid wastes have been placed into the ground water at this facility." In a memo dated Feb. 22, 1993, WCHD states that this condition is due to a lack of cover and adequate surface drainage. It is a violation of Subsections 2.1.2 of Solid Waste Regulation, 3.11.5 of Water Quality Control Commission Rules, and 2.1.4 of the Solid Waste Regulation. It was a bad site from the start,4) as time has shown. Meanwhile, the landfill operation continues to further jeopardize the environment, affecting human health and safety. For further information call 339-0629, 330-8726 or 330-6901. A Probable Cause Public Hearing is scheduled before the Weld County Board of County Commissioners on Monday, April 5, 1993, at 9:00 a.m., in the County Commissioners' Hearing Room, First Floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado. 4) Testimony at the original hearing on the Greeley -Milliken Landfill, September 22, 1971. 93106_1. 2 Attorneys At Law 1775 Sherman Street • Suite 1300 Denver, Colorado 80203 (303) 861.1953 • Fax: (303) 832-4465 Extension 123 March 17, 1993 Ms. Connie Harbert, Chairperson weld County Commission 915 Tenth Street Post Office Box 758 Greeley, Colorado 80632 Re: Hearing of April 5, 1993 Regarding Central Weld County Landfijl Dear Ms. Harbert: On behalf of the Ashston-Daniels Neighborhood Association, we request that a public comment period be set aside from 1 p.m. to 2 p.m. on April 15 for presentation by four witnesses of the Association and me. We also request that the County obtain the services of a court reporter for the hearing and that I be allowed, on behalf of the citizens, to ask questions of witnesses at the hearing. We understand that the issue at the April 5 hearing is whether there is sufficient basis to proceed to a certificate of designation revocation hearing. We are prepared to proceed in an orderly and efficient manner to address those matters which justify and require a revocation and closure order. Sincerely, Gregory J. Hobbs, Jr. for HOBBS, TROUT & RALEY, P.C. GJH:lbc cc: Mr. Lee Morrison Ashton -Daniels Neighborhood Association [IV -4 I IT 1 CG: P -Q1 .WasieSt t. 931061 • March 10, 1993 52 Weld County Commissioners Centennial Center 915 10th Street Greeley, CO. 80631 Dear Commissioners: We are owners of the property directly south and west of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. We have recently received a notice from Chuck Cunliffe of the Weld County Planning Department that you intend to hold a public hearing on the landfill on April 5, 1993. Prior to this notice, we have not been contacted by anyone at the county or the media regarding our knowledge of the current situation or the activities at the landfill for the past 20 years. Our property is the only bordering property which is below the landfill. We were not in favor of placing this facility uphill of us in 1971 when the Board of Commissioners approved the location. Nevertheless, we have had to deal with it in the best manner possible throughout these past 21 years and must continue to do so... In July 1992, the current operators informed us they had recently expanded their testing of the groundwater and discovered some contamination along the common borders of our property. Naturally. we were very concerned about this discovery they had made. However, since that time, we have been pleased to see the progress and commitment Waste Services/Waste Management has demonstrated toward resolving this situation. Our family has owned this property next to the landfill for many, many years and would like to continue to own this property. We are trying to work with the landfill operators to allow them a reasonable amount of land around the facility to do the right thing. Even if they acquire this additional property, we will still be the only property owners directly in the path of groundwater contamination. We, and you, must not jeopardize the community's best option to clean up and eventually close this facility properly. If you force the premature closure of the landfill, you are placing our property at risk for greater long range environmental damage. Please don't jeopardize the community's best solution. • 931061 ee: PL; UJaatt Sueo • • Weld County Commissioners Centennial Center March 10, 1993 Page Two Negative community opinion and pressure will not solve the only real issue; environmental impact to us in the future. We can't just wish or complain this situation away. This approach is not productive and only stands to hurt Weld County and our environment. Let's focus on taking advantage of their expertise to correct any past problems. We urge you to give Waste Services/Waste Management a chance to continue their professional approach to operating, clean-up and proper closure of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Any other action will place our property in jeopardy. Very truly yours, tac%JGr�,uZ ,w' Ella Marie Spomer Hayes Susanne Spomer Stephens >ACe-er....-- del -3/4 CC: John Pickle, Weld County Department of Health Lee Morrison, Weld County Assistant County Attorney Randolph L. Gordon, MD., M.P.H., Director. Weld County Health Dept. Chuck Cunliffe, Weld County Planning Department Roger Doak, Colorado Department of Health Barbara Taylor, Water Quality Control Division Colorado Dept. of Health Joyce Williams, Department of Health Environmental Compliance Officer 931061 • ▪ Waste Services Corporation ▪ 6037 77th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80634 303/330-2641 March 9, 1993 Barbara Taylor, Environmental Engineer Colorado Department of Health Water Quality Control Section WQCD-PE-B2 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South Denver CO 80222-1530 C,'6 rr TG ' C /4,7,60-r/ A Waste Marages'err CoT:a-; RE: RESPONSES TO CON REVIEW COMMENTS ON WASTE SERVICES CORPORATION, CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL DISCHARGE PERMIT NO: CO -0043419 Dear Ms. Taylor: This letter is in response to Colorado Department of Health (CDH) comments of December 22, 1992 concerning the discharge permit application submitted to CDH on November 25, 1992 for Central Weld Sanitary Landfill (CWSL). The CDH comments are reiterated below, followed by CWSL detailed responses. CON Comment #1: Clarification is required on the following : Please provide a Jell description of the following sample points: 1) NDIS 2) LF--UD 3) GWAMWSA 4) GWMWSA-DUP 5) N -Discharge CWSL Response: 6) RP- IM.Ef 7)EB 8) TB 9) LF-UD 1. NDIS - This symbol designates the North Discharge Sampling point. Its location is shown on Attachment 2 of the permit application. The corresponding NDIS analytical data represent samples taken at the outfall of a 36" corrugated metal pipe (CMP) which "vsl\..u.d.r\03W93 ct F: CWSL110 hibik r; Cc: Pl: Svto 931061 I Letter Barbara Taylor March 9, 1993 Page 2 is part of the northern ditch segment constructed about 1981. The purpose of the CMP and the ditch is to divert surface water run-on from properties north and upgradient of the landfill. The water in the ditch flows to the west of the CWSL through another CMP at the northwest corner of the landfill before entering the uppermost of four manmade ponds referred to as Spomer Lakes. The surface water run-on diverted through the ditch consists of stormwater and tailwater from irrigation activities upgradient of the landfill. 2. LF-UD - This symbol designates the landfill underdrain which is further described in the discharge permit application. The corresponding LF-UD analytical data represents samples taken at the outfall of the underdrain prior to discharge into the lower Spomer Lake. 3. GWMW5A - This designation was originally used to identify a new groundwater monitoring well located in the southeast corner of the landfill, which was installed as part of a hydrogeologic investigation recently conducted at the site. The new monitoring well was intended to replace monitoring well GWMW5 which is located offsite approximately 15 feet south of GWMW5A. During the course of preparing the hydrogeologic report, it was decided to change the designation of GWMW5A to GWMW5N to more appropriately indicate a new well. The groundwater monitoring well designations are shown on Figure 4 -la of the permit application. 4. GWMW5A-DUP - This laboratory designation identifies the sample from GWMW5A as analyzed in duplicate. This procedure is part of the laboratory quality control program to ensure quality data is generated. 5. N -Discharge - This symbol is equivalent to the NDIS designation described in response #1. 6. RP -Inlet - This symbol identifies the retention pond inlet from which the french drain water outfalls. The corresponding analytical data represents samples taken from the outfall of the french drain into the retention pond. The french drain is further described in the discharge permit application submitted to CDR on January 7, 1993. Briefly, the french drain and perimeter ditch system were constructed in 1991 for the remainder of the northern segment and the eastern alignment of the property boundary. The purpose of the french drain is to maintain groundwater levels at elevations below the base of refuse. 7. EB - This symbol is part of the water quality data contained in the hydrogeologic and geotechnical characterization report prepared by Golder Associates Inc., and submitted to CDR in July 1992. Enseco, the laboratory which performed water quality analyses wp3lwleon i0r0593.ca F: CV/St 1.10 931061 £ s 0 Letter Barbara Taylor March 9, 1993 Page 3 used this designation to indicate "equipment blank". This is part of a field quality control program to identify whether samples have become contaminated by field sampling procedures and/or equipment. 8. TB - This designation was also used by Enseco to identify the sample as a "trip blank". This procedure is part of a laboratory quality assurance program to determine the potential of a field sample to absorb volatile chemicals during transit. The trip blank is prepared by the laboratory and taken to the field during sampling. The trip blank accompanies the field sample back to the laboratory for analyses. Both the trip blank and field sample are analyzed and data compared as part of the quality assurance program. 9. LP-UD - See response # 2 CDH Comment #1B: "Describe the uses of the water that flows from the french drain to the retention pond.' CWSL Response: The water from the french drain outfalls to a temporary retention pond east of the landfill. The water level in the pond is currently managed by using the water primarily for onsite dust control. The water may also be used for irrigation. CWSL is currently evaluating the feasibility of routing water from the french drain to the Big Thompson River south of the site via a borrow ditch along the CWSL frontage road (77th Avenue). The discharge permit application for the french drain was submitted to the CDH on January 7, 1993. CDH Comment #1C: 'What is the ultimate use or destiny of the water that flows from the underdrain to Spomer Lake?' CWSL Response: The water from Spomer Lake is used primarily for irrigation purposes by downstream farmers. Irrigation tailwater flows through a series of irrigation channels ultimately toward the Big Thompson River. wpThis\kaaNOX693.ces P: CWsi- 1.10 931061 3 • • Letter Barbara Taylor March 9, 1993 Page 4 CDH Comment #1D: "A drain flows in a westerly direction on the northern perimeter of the properly. Please describe the discharge point and the nature of the drain." CWSL Response: The drain refered to in this sentence is the run-on control ditch north of the landfill. CDH Comment # 2: Additional testing required: Testing is required on all point -discharges which ultimately flow to surface waters of the State. Additional current data ( 3 months or less old) or testing is required for: 1) additional metals 2) fecal conforms 3) Nitrates and Nitrites 4) Total Suspended solids See Table 1 attached. CWSL Response: 5) uranium 6) Organic Chemicals 7) Pesticides Enclosed for your review as Attachment 1, is the analytical report for the additional testing required by CDH to further process the permit application. The final report is comprised of the data qualifier report, analytical data and chain of custody records. However, due to a laboratory error, fecal conforms and sulfide were not analyzed. Additional sampling is scheduled for March 1993 and analytical results will be immediately forwardedupon receipt of the sampling report. CWSL apologizes if this causes you any inconvenience in your review of the permit application. Also enclosed for your review, arc additional analytical data for sampling of the underdrain conducted in December 1992 (See Attachment 2). As you will note in your review, two volatile compounds (trichloroethene and trichlorofluoromethane) detected at near the reporting limit (3 ug/L) during July were not detected at a reportable concentration during the December sampling. wp51 W11etmA000595.e&l P: CWSL 1.10 • O Letter Barbara Taylor March 9, 1993 Page 5 Please contact Bill Hedberg at 654-1133 or Alan Scheere at 770-3324 if you have questions Sincerely, Bill Hedberg Alan Scheere Division V.P. Landfill Operations Environmental Specialist AS/mmp Enclosure cc: Roger Doak, CDH w/enc John Pickle, WCDH w/enc Lee Morrison, Assistant County Attorney w/o enc Chuck Conliffe, Weld County Department of Planning w/o enc Weld County Commissioners: Constance Harbert, Chairman w/o enc Bill Webster, w/o enc Dale Hall, w/o enc George Baxter, w/o enc Barbara Kirkmeyer, w/o enc wp51\.evemnmues3.ea P: CWSL 1.10 931061 5 ATTACHMENT 1 LFUD ADDMONAL ANALYTICAL DATA N co 921061 • WMI Environmental Monitoring Laboratories, Inc. 2100 Cleanwater Drive Geneva, Illinois 60134 708/208-3100 A Waste Manager^or': Car -cam Enclosed are the analytical results for samples received from your facility. The results in the Client Report are for a single ENS (Event Notification System) number only. The sampling event at your facility may include multiple ENS numbers. A separate Client Report will be generated for each one. It is the goal of WMI Environmental Monitoring Laboratories, Inc. to provide analytical data in a timely fashion, formatted in a way that our clients will find most useful. If you have any questions concerning the form or content of this report, please contact the WXI EML Customer Operations Department: Main Number (708) 208-3100 FAX Number (708) 208-1175 Note: Two designations may appear in the results column of your Client Report: NA or ND. The designation NA (for "Not Analyzed") is used to identify analytes which were requested in the monitoring program, but for which no suitable testing methodology exists. NA may also indicate a dry well, broken sample bottle, insufficient sample volume, or other condition which precludes analysis for a sample. The designation ND (for "Not Detected") is used to indicate that the analyte of interest was not found at or above the concentration listed under the EMLRL (EML Reporting Limit) heading. Unless otherwise indicated, all analytes meet the requirements of holding time as specified in the method. 14,44 Deborah C. Hocfonan, Ph.D. President WMI Environmental Monitoring Laboratories. Inc. Ph.O , 921061 AR: Oxidative degradation due to sample matrix is suggested. BB: Broken bottle. Acid surrogate recoveries did not meet the acceptance criteria of the method. BL: The method blank concentration associated with this analyte did not meet the acceptance criteria of the method. CX: The concentration of this compound exceeded the calibration used for this analysis. The concentration repotted is estimated. CU: Co -elution with another compound interferes with the quantitation of this compound. The concentration reported is estimated. DL: The sample was diluted during analysis. Reporting limits have been adjusted where necessary. DP: This sample was analyzed in duplicate. The relative percent difference between the two results did not meet the acceptance criteria of the method. DW: Dry well. HS: Headspace in sample exceeded laboratory control limit. The reported results of the analysis may be less than the actual value. IS: The internal standard recoveries associated with this analysis did not meet the acceptance criteria of the method. IV: The bottle did not contain enough sample to perform the analysis. MP: 3-methylphenol and 4-methylphenol co -elute under the analytical conditions of the method, and can not be differentiated solely on the basis of their mass spectra. The concentrations reported may be either or both isomers. MX: This sample was used as a matrix spike. The percent recovery did not meet the acceptance criteria of the method. The analysis of a quality control standard showed the analytical system was in control. The result reported may therfore be affected by matrix interferences. NN: N-nitrosodiphenylamine can not be distinguished from diphenylamine using gas chromatography. The concentrations reported may be either or both compounds. 931061 • • NQ: No standard qualifier code is in use for this qualification. See the associated comment. NS: There was not enough sample to repeat this analysis. PL: This result may be a product of contamination from phthalate plasticizers, which are a common lab contaminant. PX: This sample required preservation in the field to a pH of less than 2. The pH was checked before analysis and did not have a pH of less than 2. PY: This sample required preservation in the field to a pH of 4 to 5. The pH was checked before analysis and did not have a pH of 4 to 5. PZ: This sample required preservation in the field to a pH of 12 or greater. The pH was checked before analysis and did not have a pH of 12 or greater. QX: This sample was used as a matrix spike. The percent recovery did not meet the acceptance criteria of the method. The analysis of a quality control standard showed the analytical system was out -of -control. The analytical result for this parameter in the unspiked sample is suspect and may not be reported for regulatory compliance purposes. SB: The analysis of this sample was performed by an approved subcontract laboratory. ST: This compound is not stable in acidic water. SU: The analysis of the surrogate with this sample did not meet the acceptance criteria of the method. TX: The analysis for this parameter was conducted after the holding time specified in the method. UN: This compound is not stable under the conditions of the analysis. N 931061 9 S 0 NMI ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING LABORATORIES, INC CLIENT REPORT Site: 488 — CENTRAL WELD CO. L/F 6037 77TH AVE. GREELY CO 80634 Sample Point: LFUD Sample Type: OOTFALL Sample Number: AC5052 ENS: 93-10469 MP: 488932 REV: 00 Page: 1 Sampled: 27 -JAN -:993 Received: 28 -JAN -11993 Reported: 8 -MAR -1993 Analyte Result EMI RL Units Comments Method FIELD DATA: PH FIELD PH FIELD PH FIELD PH FIELD SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD WATER TEMPERATURE IN DECREES CELSIUS CHEMICAL METHODS 6 ROBOTICS: 7.21 7,22 7.22 7.24 419. 423. 425. 428. 13.2 PH ()NITS PH UNITS PH UNITS PH UNITS CMHOS/CM CMHOS/CM UMHOS/CM ?MHOS/CM DEGREES C FDPHQCADOI FDPHQUADOI FDPHQCADOI FDPHQUADO1 FDSPCONDO4 FDSPCONDO4 FDSPCONDO4 FDSPCONDO4 FDXTEMPC01 CYANIDE, TOTAL ND 0.020 MG/L CRCNTTLX01 NITROGEN, NITRATE 1.26 0.050 MG/L CRNO3HYD01 NITROGEN,NITRITE ND 0.050 MG/L BL CRNO2HYDOI SOLIDS, TOTAL SUSPENDED ND 3.000 MG/L CRTSSXXX01 INORGANICS: ALUMINUM -TOTAL ND 200.000 UG/L INICPTOTAL COPPER -TOTAL ND 25.000 UG/L INICPTOTCU NICKEL -TOTAL ND 40.000 UG/L INICPTOTNI ZINC -TOTAL ND 20.000 UC/L INICPTOTZN SUB -CONTRACT DATA: 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.086 NG/L SB SB2378TCDD ALDICARB ND 0.500 OG/L SB SBAGPST002 CARBOFORAN ND 0.900 UG/L SB SBAGPST002 OXAMYL ND 0.100 OWL SB SBAGPST002 PICLORAM ND 0.100 UG/L SE SBAGPST003 SIMAZINE ND 0.070 UG/L SB SBAGPST001 URANIUM -TOTAL 76.5 7.600 UG/L SB SBXORANIUM SEMI -VOLATILE ORGANICS: 1,2,4,5-TETRACHLOROBENZENE ND 10.000 UG/L SU' SVMS1BPP10 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE ND 10.000 UG/L SU SVMS1BPP10 1,2-DIPHENYLHXDRAZINE ND 10.000 UG/L SU SVMS1BPP10 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE ND 10.000 UG/L SO SVMSIBPP10 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE ND 10.000 UG/L SU SVMS1BPP10 2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL ND 10.000 UG/L SU SVMSIBPP10 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL ND 10.000 UG/L SO SVMS1BPP10 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOXYACETIC ACID ND 1.000 DG/L SVGC2HRB01 2,4-DINITROPHENOL ND 50.000 OG/L SO SVMS1BPPIO 2-(2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOXY)PROPIONIC ACID ND 1.000 UG/L SVGCZHRBO1 4,4' -DOE ND 0.100 OG/L SVGC1PTP14 4,4' -DDT ND 0.100 OG/L SVGC1PTP14 ALDRIN ND 0.100 OG/L SVGC1PTP14 ALPHA-BHC ND 0,100 UG/L SVGC1PTP14 AROCLOR 1016 ND 1.000 OG/L SVGCIPTPI4 AROCLOR 1221 ND 1.000 UG/L SVGC1PTP14 AROCLOR 1232 ND 1.000 OG/L SVGCIPTP14 AROCLOR 1242 ND 0.100 OG/L SVGCIPTPI4 AROCLOR 1248 ND 1.000 UG/L SVGC1PTP14 AROCLOR 1254 ND 1.000 00/L SVGC1PTP14 AROCLOR 1260 ND 1.000 OG/L SVGCIPTP14 BENZIDINE ND 50.000 OG/L 50 SVMS1BPP10 NA - Not Analyzed ND - NOt Detected THE - Trip Blank Item Additional Comment Explanations (NQ/DL) SB2378TCDD CAL ENSECO SBAG➢ST001 ENV HEALTH LABS SBACPST002 ENV HEALTH LABS SBAGPST003 ENV HEALTH LABS SBXORANIUM CLEMSON SVGC2HRB01 DUE TO FAILED ANALYTZ RECOVERY IN RO SPIKES A 6 B, SAMPLE DATA IS SUSPECT AND CONCENTRATIONS ESTIMATED. /0 41. • • Site: 488 - CENTRAL WELD CO. L/F 6037 77TH AVE. CREELY CO 80634 NMI ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING LABORATORIES, INC CLIENT REPORT Sample Point: LFDD Sample Type: OOTFALL Sample Number: AG5052 ENS: 93-10469 MP: 488932 REV: 00 Page: 2 Sampled: 27 -JAN -1993 Received: 28 -JAN -:993 Reported: 8 -MAR -1393 Analyte Result EMC, RL Units Comment. Method BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL)ETHER ND 10,000 OG/L S0 SVMSIBPPIO CHLORDANE ND 1.000 COIL SVGCIPTPI4 DIBENZ(A,HJANTHRACENE ND 10.000 OG/L SU SVMSIBPPI0 DIELDRIN ND 0.100 UG/L SVGC_PTP14 ENDRIN ND 0.100 UG/L SVGCIPTP14 ENDRIN ALDEHYDE ND 0.100 UC/L SVCCIPTP14 HEPTACHLOR ND 0.050 CC/T, SVGCIPTPI4 HEPTACHLOR EPDXIDE ND 0.500 CG/L SVGCIPTP14 BEXACHLOROBENZENE ND 10.000 CG/L SU SVMS/5PP10 HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE ND 10.000 CG/L SO SVMS/BPP1C ISOPHORONE ND 10.000 UC/L SO SVMSIBPPIO LINDANE (GAMMA-BHC) ND 0.100 UG/L SVGCIPTPI4 METHOXYCHLOR ND 0.500 00/L SVGCIPTPI4 NITROBENZENE ND 10,000 UG/L SO SVMSIBPPIO PENTACHLOROBENZENE ND 10,000 CG/L SO SVMSIBPP10 PENTACHLOROPHENOL ND 50.000 UG/I, SU SVMSLBPPIO TOXAPHENE ND 1.000 UG/L SVGC1PTP14 VOLATILE ORGANICS: 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE ND 5.000 UC/L VOMSAAX118 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE 6. 5,000 OC/L VOMSAAX118 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE ND 5.000 OG/L VOMSAAX118 1,2-DICHLOROETHENE(TOTAL) ND 10.000 UG/L VOMSAAX118 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE ND 5.000 OC/L VOMSAAX118 BENZENE ND 5.000 OC/L VOMSAAX118 BROMOCHLOROMETNANE ND 10.000 OG/L VOMSAAX118 BROMOFORM ND 5,000 COIL VOMSAAX118 CARBON TETRACHLORIDE ND 5.000 OC/L VOMSAAX118 CHLOROBENZENE ND 5.000 OC/L V0MSAAXI18 CHLOROFORM ND 5.000 ➢G/L VOMSAAX118 CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE ND 10.000 ➢G/L VOMSAAX118 ETHYLBENZENE ND 5.000 UG/L VOMSAAX118 TETRACHLOROETHENE 5. 5.000 UG/L VOMSAAX118 TOLUENE ND 5.000 OC/L V0MSAAX118 TRANS-I,2-DICHLOROETHENE ND 10.000 OC/L VOMSAAX118 TRICHLOROETHENE ND 5.000 UC/L VOMSAAX118 VINYL CHLORIDE ND 10.000 CC/L VOMSAAX118.. NA - Not Analyzed ND - Not Detected TEX - Trip Blank 931061 / 1 • • Site: 488 — CENTRAL WELD CO. L/F 6037 77TH AVE. GREELY CO 80634 NMI ENVIROmENTAL MONITORING LABORATORIES, INC CLIENT REPORT Sample Point: TBK-LFOD Sample Type: OOTFALL Sample Ntmber: AG5052 ENS: 93-10469 MP: 488932 REV: 00 Page: 3 sampled: 27 -JAN -1993 Received: 28 -JAN -1993 Reported: 8 -MAR -1993 Analyte Result EML RL Units Comments Method VOLATILE ORGANICS: 1,1,2= RICHLOROETHANE ND 5.000 UG/L VOMSAAX118 1,1-OICHLOROETHANE ND 5.000 UG/L VOMSAAX118 1,2-DICHLOROETHENE ND 5.000 OG/L VOMSAAX118 1,2-DICHLOROETHENE(TOTAL) ND 10.000 OG/L VOMSAAX118 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE ND 5.000 OG/L VCMSAAX118 BENZENE ND 5.000 00/L VOMSAAX118 BROMOCHLOROMETHANE ND 10.000 OG/L VOMSAAXI1B BROMOFOPM ND 5.000 OG/L VOMSAAXI1B CARBON TETRACHLORIDE ND 5.000 UG/L VOMSAAX118 CHLOROBENZENE ND 5.000 UG/L VOMSAAX118 CHLOROFORM ND 5.000 UG/L VOMSAAX118 CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE ND 10.000 OG/L VOMSAAX118 ETHYLBENZENE NO 5.000 UG/L VOMSAAX118 TETRACHLOROETHENE ND 5.000 OG/L VOMSAAX118 TOLUENE ND 5.000 OG/L VOMSAAX118 TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE ND 10.000 OG/L VOMSAAX118 TRICHLOROETHENE ND 5,000 OG/L VOMSAAX118 VINYL CHLORIDE ND 10.000 DG/L V0MSAAX118 NA - Not Analyzed ND - Not Detected T'BE - Trip Blank 931061 x� Site: 488 — CENTRAL WELD CO. L/F 6037 77TH AVE. CREEL? CO 80634 NMI ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING LABORATORIES, INC CLIENT REPORT Sample Point: LFOD Sample Type: OUTFALL Sample Number: AG5052 ENS: 93-10469 MP: 488932 REV: 00 Page: 1 Sampled: 27 -JAN -1993 Received: 28 -JAN -1993 Reported: 8 -MAR -1993 Analyte Result EMI RL Units Comments Method FIELD DATA: PH FIELD PH FIELD PH FIELD PH FIELD SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD WATER TEMPERATURE IN DEGREES CELSIUS CHEMICAL METHODS L ROBOTICS: 7,21 7.22 7.22 7.24 419. 423. 425. 428, 13,2 PH UNITS PH UNITS PH UNITS PH UNITS UMHOS/CM UMHOS/CM UMHOS/CM UMHOS/CM DEGREES C FOPHOCADOI FDPHOUAQO1 FDPHQUADO1 FDPHOCADDI FOSPCONDO4 FDSPCONDO4 FDSPCON004 FDSPCON004 FDXTEMPC01 CYANIDE, TOTAL ND 0.020 MG/L CRCNTTLX01 NITROGEN, NITRATE 1.26 0.050 MG/L CRNO3HYD01 NITROGEN, NITRITE ND 0.050 M.G/L BL CRN02HYD07. SOLIDS, TOTAL SUSPENDED ND 3.000 MG/L CRTSSXXXOI INORGANICS: ALUMINUM -TOTAL ND 200.000 DO/L INICPTOTAL COPPER -TOTAL ND 25.000 OG/L INICPTOTZU NICKEL -TOTAL ND 40.000 UG/L INICPTOTZI ZINC -TOTAL ND 20.000 0GIL INICPTOTZN SOB -CONTRACT DATA: 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0,086 NG/L SB SB2378TCDD ALDICARB ND 0.500 00/L SB SBACPST002 CARBOFURAN ND 0.900 OG/L SB SBAGPST002 OXAMYL ND 0.100 OGIL SB SBAOPST002 PICLORAM ND 0.100 UC/L SB SBAGPST003 SIMAZINE ND 0.070 UG/L SB SBAGPST001 URANIUM -TOTAL 76.5 7,600 0G/L SB SBXURANIUM SEMI -VOLATILE ORGANICS: 1,2,4,5-TETRACHLOROBENZENE ND 10.000 UG/L SO SVMS1BPP10 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE ND 10.000 UC/L SO SVMSIBPPIO 1,2-DIPNENYLHYDRAZINE ND 10.000 OG/L SO SVMSIBPPIO 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE ND 10.000 OG/L SO SVMS1BPP10 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE ND 10.000 UM SO SVMS1BPPIO 2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL ND 10.000 UG/L 50 SVMS1BPP10 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL ND 10.000 OC/L SU SVMS1BPP10 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOXYACETIC ACID ND 1.000 COIL SVGC2HRB01 2,4-DINITROPHENOL ND 50.000 OC/L SO SVMSIBPPIO 2-(2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOXY)PROPIONIC ACID ND 1.000 COIL SVGC2HRB01 4.4'-DDE ND 0.100 VIGIL SVGC1PTP14 4,4' -DDT ND 0.100 COIL SVCCIPTP14 ALDRIN ND 0.100 CG/L SVGC1PTP14 ALPHA-BHC ND 0.100 OG/L SVGC1PTP14 AROCLOR 1016 ND 1.000 OG/L SVGC1PTP14 AROCLOR 1221 ND 1.000 CG/L SVGC1PTP14 AROCLOR 1232 ND 1,000 CO/L SVGC1PTP14 AROCLOR 1242 ND 0.100 VG/I. SVGC1PTP14 AROCLOR 1248 ND 1.000 UG/L SVGC1PTP14 AROCLOR 1254 ND 1.000 UG/L SVGC1PTP14 AROCLOR 1260 ND 1.000 OG/L SVGC1PTP14 BENZIDINE ND 50.000 OG/L SO SVMS1BPP1O NA - Not Analyzed ND - Not Detected TBK - Trip Blank Item Additional Comment Explanations (NO/DL) 582378TCDD CAL ENSECO SBAGPST001 ENV HEALTH LABS SBAGPSTOO2 ENV HEALTH LABS SBAGPST003 ENV HEALTH LABS SBXURANICM CLEMSON SVGC2HRB01 DOE TO FAILED ANALYTE RECOVERY IN RO SPIKES A & B, SAMPLE DATA IS SUSPECT AND CONCENTRATIONS ESTIMATED. 931061 13 • • Site: 488 — CENTRAL WELD CO. L/F 6037 77TH AVE. GREELY CO 80634 NMI ENVIRONllNTAL MONITORING LABORATORIES, INC CLIENT REPORT Sample Point: LFCD Sample Type: OUTFALL Sample Number; AG5052 ENS: 93-10469 MP: 488932 REV: 00 Page: 2 Sampled: 27 -JAN -1993 Received: 28 -JAN -1993 Reported: 8 -MAR -1'393 Analyte Result EML RL Units Comments Method BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER ND 10.000 UG/L SD SVMSIBPPIO CHLORDANE ND 1.000 UO/L SVGC1PTP14 DIBENZ(A,HJANTNRACENE ND 10.000 UO/L SO SVMS1BPP1O DIELDRIN ND 0.100 UG/L SVGCIPTPI4 ENDRIN ENDRIN ALDEHYDE ND ND 0.100 0.100 UG/L UG/L SVCCIPTP14 svccIPTP14 HEPTACHLOR ND 0,050 UG/L SVGCIPTP14 HEPTACHLOR EPDXIDE ND 0,500 UO/L SVGCIPTP14 HEXACHLOROBENZENE ND 10,000 UG/L SU SVMSIBPP10 HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE ND 10,000 UG/L SU SVMSIBPPIO ISOPHORONE ND 10,000 U0/L SU SVMS1BPP10 LINDANE (GAMMA-BHC) ND 0.100 UG/L SVGCIPTP14 METHOXYCHLOR ND 0.500 UG/L SVCCIPTP14 NITROBENZENE ND 10.000 UG/L SU SVMSIBPPIO PENTACHLOROBENZENE ND 10.000 00/L SU SVMSIBPPIO PENTACHLOROPHENOL ND 50.000 UG/L SU SVMSIBPP10 TOXAPHENE ND 1,000 UG/L SVGCIPTPI4 VOLATILE ORGANICS: 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE ND 5.000 UG/L VOMSAAX118 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE 6. 5.000 UG/L V0MSAAX118 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE ND 5.000 UC/L VOMSAAX118 1,2-DICNLOROETHENE(TOTAL) ND 10.000 DG/L VOMSAAX118 1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE ND 5,000 DG/L VOMSAAX118 BENZENE ND 5.000 OG/L VOMSAAX118 BROMOCHLOROMETHANE ND 10.000 UG/L VOMSAAX118 BROMOFORM ND 5.000 UG/L VOMSAAX118 CARBON TETRACHLORIDE ND 5,000 COIL VOMSAAX118 CHLOROBENZENE ND 5.000 UG/L VOMSAAX118 CHLOROFORM ND 5.000 UG/L VOMSAAX118 CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE ND 10.000 UG/L VOMSAAX118 ETHYLBENZENE ND 5,000 UG/L VOMSAAX118 TETRACHLOROETHENE 5. 5.000 UC/L VOMSAAX118 TOLUENE ND 5.000 OG/L VOMSAAX118 TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE ND 10.000 OG/L VOMSAAX118 TRICHLOROETHENE ND 5.000 COIL VOMSAAX118 VINYL CHLORIDE ND 10.000 UG/L VOMSAAX118 NA - Not Analyzed ND - Not Detected TBK - Trip Blank 321.061 • • Site: 488 — CENTRAL WELD CO. L/F 6037 77TH AVE. GREELY CO 80634 NMI ENVIROe4KwrAL MONITORING LABORATO:*IES, INC CLIENT REPORT Sample Point: TBK-LFOD Sample Type: OOTFALL Sample Number: AC5052 Page: 3 ENS: 93-10469 Sampled: 27 -JAN -1)93 MP: 488932 Received: 28 -JAN -;993 REV: 00 Reported: 8 -MAR -1993 Analyte Result EMI RI. Units Comments Method VOLATILE ORGANICS: 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE ND 5,000 OG/L VOMSAAX118 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE ND 5,000 UG/L VOMSAAX118 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE ND 5,000 OG/L VOMSAAX118 1,2-DICHLOROETHENt(TOTAL) ND 10,000 UC/L VOMSAAX118 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE ND 5.000 UG/L VOMSAAX118 BENZENE ND 5.000 UG/L VOMSAAX118 BROMOCRLOROMETHANE ND 10,000 UG/L V0MSAAX118 BROMOFORM ND 5.000 OC/L VOMSAAX118 CARBON TETRACHLORIDE ND 5.000 7G/I, VOMSAAX118 CHLOROBENZENE ND 5,000 7C/L VOMSAAX118 CHLOROFORM ND 5,000 7G/L VOMSAAX118 CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE ND 10.000 7G/L VOMSAAX118 ETHYLBENZENE ND 5.000 'JG/L VOMSAAX118 TETRACHLOROETHENE ND 5.000 'JG/L VOMSAAX118 TOLUENE ND 5,000 UC/L VOMSAAX118 TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE ND 10.000 NG/L VOMSAAX118 TRICHLOROETHENE ND 5.000 UC/L VOMSAAX118 VINYL CHLORIDE ND 10.000 UC/L VOMSAAX118 J NA - Not Analyzed ND - Not Detected TAX - Trip Blank A/ 931061 /5 C. Subcontract To: r WMI Environmental Monitoring Laboratories. Inc. FIELD CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY RECORD .. SITE/FACILITY al 4Bfl 1 I SITE NAME CENTPc.L WELD CO. Sample Point: .�, i 1 I- U S.re. Cox B SAMPLE DATE: - !y J nif!L ry YM'DD SAMPLE TIME ! f ! { ! I MATRIX CODE LU Source Cooes We . .. . . .. . • • • ..... W . eacna a Sv t .C'. a eveernen, rac,:,,rr.. , n. Pint, S.rean Stoo" .. RI Son. .... .. a..... G w.nr nq.a.ern . amoni ... 0 '. Gas Coeaenu.e. ..: m. u .or0nen CI No... Sec ens„ Si S A SYrreCt WISP m0Eoe0menl ... ,I', q.r Al;P!'.u.et Ti (Lin,' CI NO.ee Ni $Ce6' war Sod.. AgdiPak" PREP Aqua / ., Pak" • -- Date Sealed 111' ! .'1/ I ^ is YY MM 00 Seal k �1 elk'. By. Gam, (W) Leatnate C) (Si Other (xl ENS* ISAMPLE BOTTLES E$ :BOTTLE PRESERVATIVE TIVE ANALYTES/LAB GROUPS r��_♦EN rIELO COMMENTS EM L. COMMENTS -,:j` " F/COIL DV I�, ar "yS 04 G NONE/COOL 4 t —E----4 N ,55)52-C 04 co HCL/COOL 4'OEG C v0 Y Ar052-0 01 C NONE/COOL DEG _C_ _..SB Yetz*r'w$ AG5052 E 02 G NONE/COOL 4 DEC C SB � � �,�� 4 .a 1 Aae5052- F 01 _--EL - 2-1_N�.ACEIAI_ELNAOH/ 4CSB " � - .AG5052-G 01 P NONE/COOL 4 DEG C SB Y f4. -I A3505Z-H.. _ ..01.._._ p NAOH/COOL 4 DEG C CR AG.5052., � 01 G NONE/COOL 4 DEG C CR j.. AG5052J_ 01 q ''1171VE/tO17L 4 DEG C CR Y ,t► :-,- ._ . _ AG5052 I<. - -... _....A7_ ..*. P HNO3,,.__...._ IN Y,.... -fl AG5052-L 04 G NONE/COOL 4 DEG C SV N.(avy1T1' AG5052-M 01 G HCL/COOL 4 DEG T E_,., Li � M G`r02='IR O1 G HCL/COi7L 4 DEG C S Y - Q52 -P a Y AG5052-7_e,__01 G HCL/SCDL 4 DE&C _ VO y Bk N ITC? - 1040 AquaPak" CONTENT CHAIN OF CUSTODY CHRONICLE AquaPak^ Opened By: (print �r.ft Jtvv..2N; Date: 3z1 o / / 7 Time 2400 HR. Signature: �u� ( �r' Seal n' 114/14,5 Intact _W 1 have received the = r aterials in ....d condition from the above person. 2. Name: Signature - Date: / / Time: Remarks' 2400 HR. I have received these materials in good condition from the above person. 3. Name: Signature' Date:_ / / Time: Remarks' 2400 HR. AquaPak'•/Sub Contr. N Sealed By. ,ezx.1EN,•N4) 4. (rpm Signature: Date' 93 / e l l k t Time- /A 2400 HR Seal W. Q 01/0 !95 Intact: LAB USE ONLY Opened By: ' '°ee'"re Date: ( ",)61 ¶ Time 2400 HR. 0 I c' J Intact. 931061 r N AquaPak^/Sub. Contr" /I Temp.°C _ Seal 0 site B Iq WMI Environmental Monitoring Laboratories, Inc. HELD INFORMATION FORM Bottle Set: [AIc_IsI01- ISI Sample Point: & G F k.c•Coo. 31oIi17-1i P"AGE DATE ire MM D01 Purging Equipment ...... Purging Device Sampling Device Dedicated I PURGING INFORMATION START ppE EW 5Ep MRS WATER Q. IN cAsNG 120 Rr Cbnnl IlMbml PURGING AND SAMPLING EQUIPMENT Sampling Equipment Dedicated, ! N A -Submersible Pump 8 -Peristaltic Pump C -Bladder Pump 0 -Gas Lift Pump E -Venturi Pump F-Dipper/Bottle G -Bailer X- .uµ WEUME %!AGED IGYbMI Marta MM. PuaGIRG g!^ER 1 sPECM1 V H-Scoop/ShOvel X- SaMPImG an(R ,SPE.rn I -Piston Pump Purging Material Sampling Material Tubing -Purging Tubing•Sampling 1 1 ATeflon B -Stainless Steel f I /IATeflon �f BTygon Laid X - Filtering Devices 0.45 pi:L,il A -In -line Disposable Well Elevation Depth to water From top of well casing Groundwater Elevation Well Depth 1st 1 I712141(STD) PA 2nd 1 112121(510) PR 3rd I 1712171 (VD) 4th I 171St' I (STD) C -Polypropylene D -PVC 0 -Polypropylene E -Polyethylene 9.ECr•1 B -Pressure G -Combination teflon/ X - Polypropylene C -Vacuum E -Polyethylene X. _ X _ - _ PLACING V!,ER,5PEGrYi SAMPIe One.. t°PECmPeC✓n F -Silicon X• •u OIN° DTREA i YECrv, SAMPLING OTRER. sncin, Fl LD MEASUREMENTS I I I 1 (fVmsl) Land Surface Elevation (ft) 1 I I (ft/msl) 1 I —Pri-1 lot) 1st I I I'121R1 WIC cMC. 2nd I I I41ti1s1 'PYC. cond.. Depth to water From land surface Groundwater Elevation Stickup jarn/cm at 25° C ymkm at25°C 3rd I I 1412131 alt 25r" C R_.c. cam 4th I I IA /�1 at 5s C awc cove Sample Temp. I I 1131-1(° C) Ore RMMMM- 1 L_1 1111) II I.R.. .... M,M i 111111 Li in w°MYan Sample Appearance: Clap COMMENTS Clap odor. N°/' Corot AA"' (Y wowan Weather Condttions: Wind %aad uio.iE pn o r Specific Comments. S4 r )7Lis „So r 'L 65 PG,o Cet-O a.0 TA/alLi, 1120. - TA W. eA/ '� cc.sq.a 4-G .P Otte rty 4,///r0 Foal, E44 -T4/ Lest react Turbidity. AA ^#6. Precipitation V©' Outlook E ten'.kC Lw.oDF2c. UA, OEl- OaA,a' Sc-,",'-y e/s. ST72-4_14IYAN‘O Tn ram fia, Lee sicet.r1' dT POLL /SO I ILe -- I certify that sampling procedyrre/e 43/ I Pry �`Yr I - were in accordance with applicable EPA, State and WMI protocols. Employer. SL-"G-.45woryuc nil Ave as LIM nrnrnu • S ATTACH:KENT 2 LFUD FOURTH QUARTER ANALYTICAL DATA pi 931061 /8 WMI Environmental Monitoring Laboratories, Inc. 2100 Cleanwater Drive Geneva, Illinois 60134 708/208.3100 A Waste Maragerrer: Cc^cam Enclosed are the analytical results for samples received from your facility. The results in the Client Report are for a single ENS (Event Notification System) number only. The sampling event at your facility may include multiple ENS numbers. A separate Client Report will be generated for each one. It is the goal of WMI Environmental Monitoring Laboratories, Inc. to provide analytical data in a timely fashion, formatted in a way that our clients will find most useful. If you have any questions concerning the form or content of this iaport, please contact the WMI EML Customer Operations Department: Main Number (708) 208-3100 FAX Number (708) 208-1175 Note: Two designations may appear in the results column of your Client Report: NA or ND. The,designation NA (for "Not Analyzed") is used to identify analytes which were requested in the monitoring program, but for which no suitable testing methodology exists. NA may also indicate a dry well, broken sample bottle, insufficient sample volume, or other condition which precludes analysis for a sample. The designation ND (for "Not Detected") is used to indicate that the analyte of interest was not found at or above the concentration listed under the EMLRL (EML Reporting Limit) heading. Unless otherwise indicated, all analytes meet the requirements of holding time as specified in the method. 14.1 e Deborah C. Hockman, Ph.D. President WMI Environmental Monitoring Laboratories, Inc. Ph.D, 931061 /9 • • AR: Data Qualifier Comment Code Definitions Acid surrogate recoveries did not meet the acceptance criteria of the method. Oxidation degradation due to sample matrix was confirmed. BB: Broken bottle. BL: The method blank concentration associated with this analyte did not meet the acceptance criteria of the method. CX: The concentration of this compound exceeded the calibration used for this analysis. The concentration reported is estimated. CU: Co -elution with another compound interferes with the quantitation of this compound. The concentration reported is estimated. DL: The sample was diluted during analysis. Reporting limits have been adjusted where necessary. DP: This sample was analyzed in duplicate. The relative percent difference between the two results did not meet the acceptance criteria of the method. OW: Dry well HS: The headspace in this sample bottle exceeded 6 millimeters. IS: The internal standard recoveries associated with this analysis did not meet the acceptance criteria of the method. IV: The bottle did not contain enough sample to perform the analysis. MP: 3-methylhphenol and 4-methylphenol co -elute under the analytical conditions of the method, and can not be differentiated solely on the basis of their mass spectra. The concentrations reported may be either or both isomers. MX: This sample was used as a matrix spike. The percent recovery did not meet the acceptance criteria of the method. The analysis of a quality control standard showed the analytical system was in control. The result reported msy therefore be affected by matrix interferences. NN: N-nitrosodiphenylamine can not be distinguished from diphenylamine using gas chromatography. The concentrations reported may be either or both compounds. NQ: No standard qualifier code is in use for this qualification. See the associated comment. NS: There was not enough sample to repeat this analysis. 831061 L C • PL: This result may be a product of contamination from phthalate plasticizers, which are a common lab contaminant. PX: This sample required preservation in the field to a pH of less than 2. The pH was checked after receipt at the lab, and did not have a pH of less than 2. PY: This sample required preservation in the field to a pH of 4 to 5. The pH was checked after receipt at the lab, and did not have a pH of 4 to 5. PZ: This sample required preservation in the field to a pH of 12 or greater. The pH was checked after receipt at the lab, and did not have a pH of 12 or greater. QX: This sample was used as a matrix spike. The percent recovery did not meet the acceptance criteria of the method. The analysis of a quality control standard showed the analytical system was out -of -control. The analytical result for this parameter in the unspiked sample is suspect and may not be reported for regulatory compliance purposes. RA: Acid surrogate recoveries associated with this analysis did not meet the acceptance criteria of the method. RB: Base/neutral surrogate recoveries associated with this analysis did not meet the acceptance criteria of the method. SB: The analysis of this sample was performed by an approved subcontract laboratory. ST: This compound is not stable in acidic water. SU: The analysis of the surrogate with this sample did not meet the acceptance criteria of the method. TX: The analysis for this parameter was conducted after the holding time specified in the method. UN: This compound is not stable under the conditions of the analysis. N 93101 a Page: 1 NMI ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING LABORATORIES, INC ‘01 Site: 488 — CENTRAL WELD CO. L/F 6037 77TH AVE. GREELY CO 80634 C L I ENT REPORT Sample Point: LFUD Sample Type: OUTFALL Sample Number: AG2132 ENS: 92-13531 MP; 488921 REV: 02 Sampled: -:992 Received: 19 -DEC -.932 Reported: L1 -JAN -1593 Analyte Result EML RL Units Comments Method FIELD DATA: DEPTH TO WATER FROM TOP OF CASING GROUNDWATER ELEV. PH FIELD PH FIELD - NA NA 6.90 6.91 FT FT MSL PH UNITS PH UNITS FDWDTWTCOI FDWGWELWDT FDPHQUADOI FDPHQUADO: PH FIELD PH FIELD SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE FIELD WATER TEMPERATURE IN DEGREES CELSIUS WELL DEPTH TOTAL CHEMICAL METHODS i ROBOTICS: 6.92 6.94 428. 426. 430. 432. 13.2 NA PH UNITS PH UNITS UMHOS/CM UMHOS/CM UMHOS/CM UMHOS/CM DEGREES C FT FDPHQUADOI FDPHQUAD01 FDSPCOND04 FDSPCOND04 FDSPCOND04 FDSPCONDO4 FDXTEMPC01 FDWGWELWDT ALKALINITY 533 - 20.000 MG/L DL CRALKMOTOI CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND 19 10.000 MG/L CRCODXXX01 CHLORIDE 45.3 0.500 MG/L CRCHLORIO1 NITROGEN, AMMONIA ND 0.020 MG/L CRN2NH3X01 NITROGEN, NITRATE 1.19 0.050 MG/L CRNO3HYDOI NITROGEN,NITRITE 0.050 0.050 MG/L CRNO2HYD01 SULFATE 2200 250.000 MG/L DL CRSOLFATO1 TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON 5.6 1.000 MG/L CRTOCDUPOI TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON 5.5 1.000 MG/L CRTOCOUP01 INORGANICS: BARIUM -TOTAL ND 200,000 UG/L INICPTOTBA CADMIUM -TOTAL ND 5.000 UG/L INICPTOTBD CALCIUM -TOTAL 490000 5000.000 UG/L INICPTOTCA CHROMIUM -TOTAL ND 10.000 UG/L INICPTOTCR IRON -TOTAL 243 100.000 CG/L INICPTOTFE LEAD -TOTAL ND 25.000 UG/L DL INGFAATOPB MAGNESIUM -TOTAL 290000 5000.000 UG/L INICPTOTMG MANGANESE -TOTAL 1750 15.000 UC/L INICPTOTMN MERCURY -TOTAL ND 0.200 UG/L INCVAATOHG NICKEL -TOTAL ND 40.000 OG/L INICPTOTNI POTASSIUM -TOTAL ND 5000,000 UG/L INFAATOTXX SODIUM -TOTAL 230000 5000.000 UG/L INICPTOTNA ZINC -TOTAL ND 20.000 OG/L INICPTOTZN SUB -CONTRACT DATA: GROSS ALPHA 93.4 15,000 PCl/L +/- SB SBALPHBETA GROSS BETA ND 30.000 PCI/L +/- SB SBALPHBETA RADIUM 226 ND 5.000 PCI/L +/- SB SBRA226228 RADIUM 226 -STANDARD DEVIATION N/A PCl/L +/- SB SBRA226228 RADIUM 228 ND 5.000 PCl/L +/- SB SBRA226228 RADIUM 228 -STANDARD DEVIATION STANDARD DEVIATION -GROSS ALPHA STANDARD DEVIATION -GROSS BETA VOLATILE ORGANICS: N/A 21.6 N/A - PCI/L +/- PCl/L +/- PCl/L +/- SB SB SB - SBRA226228 SBALPHBETA SBALPHBETA 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE ND 5,000 UG/L V0MSBAX322 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ND 5.000 OG/L VOMSBAX322 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE ND 5.000 UG/L VOMSBAX322 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE 6. 5.000 UG/L VOMSBAX322 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE ND 5.000 UG/L VOMSBAX322 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE ND 5.000 UG/L VOMSBAX322 NA - Not Analyzed ND - Not Detected TBK - Trip Blank Item Additional Comment Explanations (NQ/DL) ALKALINITY SULFATE LEAD -TOTAL SBALPHBETA SBRA226228 Dilution Dilution Dilution CLEMSON CLEMSON factor factor factor 2 applied. 50 applied. 5 applied. 931061 4A • Site: 488 - CENTRAL WELD CO. L/F 6037 77TH AVE. CREEL? CO 80634 WMI ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING LABORATORIES, INC CLIENT REPORT Sample Point: LFUO Sample Type: CUTFALL Sample Number: AG2132 ENS: 92-1353: MP: 488921 REV: 02 Page: 2 Sampled: .- EC -').1 Received: 19 -DEC -1i Reported: ':_-JAN-::. ?. Analyte Result EMI RI Units Comments Method 1,2-DICHLOROETHENE(TCTAL) ND 10.000 UG/L VCMSBAX322 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE ND 5.000 UG/L VOMSBAX322 2-BUTANONE ND 10.000 UG/L v0MSBAX3222 2-HEXANONE ND 10.000 UG/L VOMSBAX322 4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE ND 10.000 UG/L VOMSBAX322 ACETONE ND 34.000 UG/L VOMSBAX322 BENZENE ND 5.000 UC/L VOMSBAX322 BROMODICHLCROMETHANE ND 5.000 UG/L VOMSBAX322 BROMOFORM ND 5.000 0G/L VOM5BAX322 BRCMOMETHANE ND 10.000 ':G/L VOMSBAX322 CARBON DISULFIDE ND 5.000 UG/L VOMSBAX322 CARBON TETRACHLORIDE NO 5.000 UG/L VOMSBAX322 CRLOROBENZENE ND 5.000 UC/L VOMSBAX322 CHLOROETHANE ND 10.000 UG/L VOMSBAX322 CHLOROFORM ND 5.000 UG/L VOM5BAX322 CHLORCMETHANE ND 10,000 UG/L VOMSBAX322 CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE ND 5.000 UG/L VOMSBAX322 DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE ND 5.000 UG/L VOMSBAX322 DICHLOROFLOOROt4ETHANE 19, 10.000 UC/L VOMSBAX322 ETHYLBENZENE ND 5.000 UG/L VOMSBAX322 METHYLENE CHLORIDE NO 5.000 UG/L VOMSBAX322 STYRENE ND 5.000 UG/L VOMSBAX322 TETRACHLOROETHENE 5, 5.000 UG/L VOMSBAX322 TOLUENE ND 5.000 OG/L VOMSBAX322 TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE ND 5.000 UG/L VOMSSAX322 TRICHLOROETHENE ND 5.000 0G/L VOMSBAX322 TRICHLOR0FLu0ROMETHANE ND 10.000 UG/L VOMSBAX322 VINYL ACETATE ND 10.000 Co/L VCM5EAX322 VINYL CHLORIDE ND 10.000 CG/L VOMSBAX322 XYLENE(TOTAL) ND 10.000 0G/L V0M5BAX322 NA - Not Analyzed ND - Not Detected TBR - Trip Blank 931061 ,2 •r s Subcontract To: • WMI Environmental Monitoring Laboratories, Inc. FIELD CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY RECORD S SITE/FACILITY41 48940 SITE NAME: CENTRAL WELD CO./c Sample Point' k L /It& SAMPLE DATE: - l 1 - ! ' 're / MM DO SAMPLE TIME ' 1 ' l : i<-' lc- Source Codes Well .. .. .... ... iWl LOCUM System ..(CI ."treatment Facility !R) Riv.ri$igemlBr00r , (RI Soe ........'S1 OBottom .weu✓mor Vre..ur.'R.url. ...,OI Gas Conesnu". ..( MI mAtant U, Site et Ocean all Bottom'Stemea,...' BI Other Suttees W.1lr ImoounO ant ... (11 Av 'AI Effluent ITI Outten 1O, Nom*INI 5p c.1y /"° t2°' .6)MATRIX CODE: PREP AquePak" Jig" Date iealW l I / lrx I O VS* Br yr / MM / Do -902115/ .t}C Water (w) Leecnete (C) So4 (S) Omer ............ pO ENS SAMPLE I.D. rof MAWSTY►[ grrtu PRESERVATIVE TYPE ANALrres/LAa wows FILTER r -N FIELD COMMENTS EM.L COMMENTS 482132-A 01 P HNO3 SB v :' I AG2132-B 02 P HNO3 SB r �( AG2132-C 01 8 H2SC4/COOL 4 DE8 C CR v N ` A02132 -D 01 6 H2SO4/COOL, 4 D€€ C CR v N F- '•. AG2132-E 02 3 H2SO4/COOL 4 DE4. C CR 402132-F 01 0 NONE/COOL 4 DEG C • CR Y •• A&2132-8 01 P NONE COOL 4 DEG C CR r '—Cr Ad'2132-H 61 P HNO _ r IN v fir„ "x _. 482137-t Ol P HNO3 • A., IN v 40'2152-3 04 0 HCL/COOL ♦ C' V11 r N AG21S2-K C1 .s. HCL COOL i' -' v ' - .. ;. Y N r r 1tir < 4.., } I" N AquaPak" CONTENT CHAIN OF CUSTODY CHRONICLE AquaPak" Opened By: rint) /�°� J`"' �'"'c f Date: a`/ /L/ /G Time- v 1. a ) , ' ;>;.• ; r,, 2400 R. Signature: �5 t ' Seal x: 1.47/ Intact' ?4- I have received these materi 2. Name' Date: / r� 4and"ion from the abmispriDn. Signature _ 2400 Ht Iralarks: I have received these materials in. ood condition from theabprapoison. 3. Name: Sinecure Date: / / Time_ Remark:K - 2400 HR. AquaPar/Sub Contr. N , Sealed 81c i4ZJ ✓sS� Date' 72-/ 1. //'7 Time: l'C : 4. Signature: r ` . T ' f / r76 9 r - Seal #: _ � "� Intact: LAB USE ONLY Opened By: (eyeerMlel ) Datr /7,r / >].!time: I (A.' 9 } •2400 HR. 5ses �` 7 7 6-o Intact. 51 61-& minim N AquaPak"/Suh Contr M /05--i TemP•C • •, WMI Environmental Monitoring Laboratories. Inc. HELD INFORMATION FORM L PURGING INFORMATION Site e•lc Bottle Set: 4l` a1^ I / E I Sample Point: Xi 1 Z. I' it t I t I I n r rV110E 0,eE......4SEr RT FlO034 `ELAPSED AS WATER %Oa. M CJSMG Cri MM CO (2cCO w Clockf (0400O PURGING AND SAMPLING EQUIPMENT Purging Equip --. -...-.7 tiff Wc Cilia IVi INI Sampling Equipment ....... Dedicated ; '& - N Lea ICPIS Purging Device Sampling Device Purging Material Sampling Material Tubing -Purging Tubing -Sampling u L. A -Submersible Pump 8 -Peristaltic -Pump C -Bladder Pump A -Teflon 8 -Stainless Steel D -Gas Lift Pump G -Sailer X- EVenhiri Paine H-Scoop/Shovel X- F-Dipper/Bottle I -Piston Pump C -Polypropylene E -Polyethylene X- PUndno Or.EP isPELlrn D -PVC X- saMPuno cent isf Ecr*1 Mellon F -Silicon X- 8-Tygon 0 -Combination teflon/ X- C -Rope X- Polypropylene .srec.ry Filtering Devices 0.45 p:J A•In-line Disposable 8 -Pressure C -Vacuum 0 -Polypropylene E -Polyethylene *Crum. wauME MACAO IGfbwr ryPOMO OrmER ISP€C,fp SAMttWO a'nE 1ISPECRY) PU4O.MO mHER'SPECIFY. swKI..O Ofn(R.sreurh Well Elevation Depth to water From top of well casing FIELD MEASUREMENTS 1 1 1 JrI (Wmsl) Land Surface .Elevation Depth to water ' T H i l l (tt) From land surface Groundwater jievsti+ nn I. I 1 1 1 1 J (Wmsp Well Depth 15t L 1141 I' -/f (s 0) 2nd 1 1/.01f PI (sro) RE 3rd I 11411/ I (STD) on 4th I ]14?la (STD) I I I i j l I(It) 191 I i I9I3 , sort. cono. 2nd I I It/I31)1 wwoo. cond. 3rd I Eau. can. am 111'/ I,*4 MEE Cop (ftlmst) (tt) Groundwater Elev I I I I j 1 I (Wmsl) -Sp 1 1 1 1 l 1 l (tt) at 25° C Sample Temp. I 1/ 1-3P 1 (° C) pmkm at 25° C pm/cm at 25° C pmkm at 25° C (a— oarenlisd �a°nr n°°+n (OM iprimseen 11111 L>J MM —5 1 L_1 II11JI LJ Sample Appearancx Weather Conditions: Specific Comments:�4 —1 le, Qdor. rP'CArS FIELD COMMENTS ,U c S Color. Li P. r .--..- f./A e•c,(LP c Gtr ,l ( -,.+ 11.) I c ) Turbidity 1 n PrOclpu a4ia 0•4100 4t 77/ "-s . $11114N -r /v -/.2- ,nf-d{S -..,.,. " ke- I army the sampli res were in accordance with appe lbta EPA. State and WMI protocols. /� 1/71 7 fi�,.�-1,......_____ Employe „let: Poe &iI • C /\,/ era MIA NO REGION • • waste Services Corporation 6037 77th Avenue Greeley. Colorado 80634 303/330-2641 n March 4, 1993 Trevor Jiricek Weld County Department of Health 1617-16 Avenue Court Greeley CO 80631 C,C:: • T y A Waste Management Company RE: RESPONSES TO WELD COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH (WCDH) COMMENTS ON THE GROUNDWATER MONITORING PLAN FOR CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL (CWSL) Dear Mr. Jiricek: This letter is in response to the WCDH comments of October 30, 1992 concerning the groundwater monitoring plan for CWSL. During our meeting on October 6, 1992, it was mutually agreed that CWSL would provide responses to WCDH review comments once the Colorado Department of Health completed it's review of the groundwater monitoring plan. The CDH provided comments to CWSL regarding their review of several documents (including the groundwater plan) in a letter dated December 21, 1992. Subsequently, a meeting was held on January 20, 1993 between CDH, WCDH and CWSL to discuss CWSL's preliminary approach for responding to each issue and to discuss the time requirements necessary to provide an adequate response. After the January 20, meeting CWSL finalized its response to CDH and submitted it on February 5, 1993. This letter will address WCDH comments which are reiterated below, followed by CWSL's responses. The responses were prepared with the assistance of Golder Associates, Inc. WCDH Comment No 1: All monitoring wells previously monitored on the facility must be monitored on a quarterly basis at a minimum. This includes monitoring wells GWMW-5, GWMW-5N and all seven (7) deep' monitoring wells referred to in this document. The division feels it would be inappropriate to abandon GWMW--5 at this time. The deep monitoring wells must be monitored quarterly for a minimum of eight (8) quarters to establish background concentrations. After these concentrations have been established the facility may request that the sampling frequency be amended." wp5l\u\In1er102229311.web 9: CW91, 3.2.93 s 4.1.6.93 931061 Letter Trevor Jiricek March 4, 1993 Page 2 CWSL Response: All monitoring wells including deep groundwater monitoring wells will be monitored for eight consecutive quarters for the parameters to be agreed upon by the CDH and CWSL. WCDH Comment No 2: "On page 9 the document refers to four (4) permitted wells downgradient of the facility which "warrant discussion". The division requests that the facility develop a monitoring protocol for these four (4) wells and that they are monitored quarterly for a minimum of eight (8) quarters. The facility may request an amendment to the Groundwater Monitoring Plan after eight (8) quarterly sampling events have been completed." CWSL Response: During the January 20, 1993 meeting CDH and WCDH agreed with concerns raised by CWSL regarding the capability of samples collected from the private wells to identify impacts from the landfill. These four (4) wells are identified by permit #15091, #765, #11090 and #90580. As we discussed, sampling groundwater from these wells is unlikely to provide reliable information for comparison to groundwater quality at the landfill due to (1) the demonstrated limited extent of impacts to groundwater from the landfill, (2) different or unknown completion depths and geologic conditions of selected private wells, (3) unknown completion techniques for the private wells, and (4) other potential impacts to groundwater quality. 1. Limited Extent of Impacts to Groundwater from the Landfill Additional hydrogeologic characterization activities conducted at the site subsequent to submittal of the " Hydrogeologic and Geotechnical Characterization Report " revealed that volatile organic compound concentrations in the shallow groundwater are limited to less than 200 feet south of the landfill (see letter report entitled "Expanded Hydrogeologic Investigation at the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill," October 23, 1.992). Of the four (4) private wells referenced by WCDH, well permit #'s 765, 11090 and 90580 are downgradient of the landfill. The closest well is approximately 2000 feet from the landfill and the farthest is approximately 4500 feet from the landfill. Based on these data, the downgradient wells are at least 10 times farther from the landfill than the extent of detectable volatile organic compounds. This indicates that analyses of groundwater from the private wells will not provide useful information for comparison to the groundwater quality at the landfill. wp51 Wtbum10222931t.wch P: CWSL 3.2.93 it 4.1.6.93 931061 • Letter Trevor Jiricek March 4, 1993 Page 3 Since the remaining well (#159091) is located upgradient approximately 500 feet from the landfill, it would be inappropriate to use this well to determine impacts from the landfill. 2. Different or Unknown Completion Depths and Geologic Conditions of Selected Wells Table 1-2 of the "Hydrogeologic and Geotechnical Characterization Report" includes depths of the wells (permit #765, #11090 and #90580 ) as provided by the State Engineer's office. The depth of well (permit #159091) has not been reported to the State Engineer's office. However, as previously indicated, this well is upgradient of the landfill. As shown on table 1-2, the well with permit #765 is completed to depth of 263 feet. Additional information subsequently obtained from the State Engineer's office indicates that the screened interval for the well with permit #765 is from 233 to 263 feet below ground surface. The screened interval is approximately 200 feet deeper than the shallow aquifer beneath the landfill. This well is located approximately 4500 feet from the landfill. Based on the distance of the well from the landfill, its deep completion interval and the absence of any detectable contamination in onsite deep wells, sampling of this offsite deep well is not necessary. The wells with permit #11090 and #90580 are completed at shallow depths (i.e. less than 40 feet) below ground surface. Of these two wells, geologic information is available for only the well with permit #11090. These wells are located approximately 3000 and 2000 feet east of the landfill respectively. The great distance from the landfill to these wells renders geologic and hydrogeologic interpretation unreliable due to the great intervening distance for which no data exists. Furthermore, as is typical, the geologic data collected during drilling of these wells is incomplete and inadequate for proper comparison to the data collected at the landfill. No geologic data exists for well #90580 and the geologic data collected for well #11090 included only three units: gravel, clay, and sandstone. Gravels were the predominant geologic unit identified for this well. No gravels were encountered at the landfill. Accordingly, it is not possible to reliably correlate the geology at the landfill to the geology at this shallow well. 3. Unknown Completion Techniques The drilling and completion techniques used on the downgradient wells are unknown but were likely much less stringent than the drilling and completion techniques used to complete the monitoring wells at the landfill. Incomplete decontamination procedures, inappropriate well completion materials (such as carbon steel, grease, oils, etc.) and inadequate well maintenance and security often render data collected from the monitoring of private wells unreliable. 4. Other Potential Impacts to Ground Water Quality wp51 W lktict1o22293n.wcb P: CWSL 3,2.93 it 4.1.6.93 931061 3 • • Letter Trevor Jiricek March 4, 1993 Page 4 In addition to potential impacts from CWSL to surrounding ground water quality, land use impacts including agricultural practices can impact ground water quality. For instance, pesticide and fertilizer application, equipment maintenance and septic systems, all may have potential impacts not attributable to CWSL. WOE Comment No 3: "Spomer Lakes and the "underdrain" must be included in the plan. Both must be sampled during each sampling event, and analyzed for the same parameters as the monitoring wells." CWSL Response: Prior to 1992, WCDH sampled the underd.rain parameters it deemed appropriate, which included only inorganic constituents. In 1992 CWSL initiated its own monitoring program for the outfall. Since July 1992, CWSL has monitored the outfall for parameters similar to those sampled as part of the hydrogeologic study. CWSL will continue to monitor the outfall during each groundwater sampling event and will analyze for the same parameters as the monitoring wells as agreed to in response to comments #4 and 6. As discussed during the January 20, 1993 meeting surface water sampling at the site including the underdrain, will be regulated by the Water Quality Control Division and will be coordinated with the Solid Waste Division of the CDH. Therefore it would be inappropriate for the Spomer Lakes and the underdrain (surface water sources), which will be subject to permit conditions when issued, to be included in the groundwater monitoring plan at this time. Accordingly, it is understood that this particular comment is no longer applicable. WCDH Comment No 4: "In addition to the proposed inorganic analytes listed in table 5-1, analysis must include Barium, Chromium and Nickel. Also radionuclides must be monitored in all monitoring wells for a minimum of eight (8) quarterly sampling events. The facility may request an amendment to the Groundwater Monitoring Plan after (8) sampling events have been completed." CWSL Response: CWSL agrees to add barium, chromium and nickel to the parameter list in Table 5-1. CWSL also agrees to add radionuclides to Table 5-1 but, because radionuclide concentrations have been shown to represent natural conditions, we suggest the frequency be annually rather than quarterly. 4/01142114an102229311.4/65 F: CWSL 3.2.93 R 4.1.6.93 9 106 Letter Trevor Jiricek March 4, 1993 Page 5 WCDH Comment No 5: "Quarterly monitoring of depth to groundwater in all piezometers must be conducted during each quarterly sampling event and su:3mitted in each quarterly report. " CWSL Response: In response to the WCDH comment, water levels in the piezometers will be monitored on a quarterly basis and the data will be submitted to the WCDH and CDH. Although we agree to provide this information at this time, these piezometers may be required to be abandoned due to operational necessity. Consideration for replacing abandoned piezometers will be given on a case by case basis. WCDH Comment No 6: "The proposed volatile organic analytes (table 5-1) are inappropriate. At a minimum, the thirty- four volatile organic compounds (VOC's) included in the July 1992 characterization must be included in the proposed parameter list. In addition to these thirty- four (34), the parameters also must include Dichlorodifluoromethane, Trichlorofluoromethane, and carbon disulfide." CWSL Response: The parameter list specified on Table 5-1 of the "Ground Water Monitoring Plan" complies with current regulations governing sampling and analysis of ground water at solid waste landfills (see Section 2.2.3 of the Solid Waste Regulations) and also includes additional volatile organic compounds not specified in the Solid Waste Regulations but which were detected in shallow ground water. Accordingly, we believe the parameter list specified in Table 5-1 is appropriate. The basis for requesting the additional parameters listed above is unclear. CWSL has demonstrated that only a select few volatile organic compounds are present in ground water at the site. These compounds are included in the monitoring plan. WCDH Comment No 7: "The Division requires that the facility apply for a discharge permit with the Water Quality Control Commission, Colorado Department of Health in regard to the "underdrain" and the associated discharge into a water of the State. In addition, the Division requires that the facility apply for this permit within fourteen (14) days of receipt of this letter." M wp51 W\kaar\o2229311.wch F: CWSL 3.2.93 & 4.1.6.93 3::1061 Letter Trevor Jiricek March 4, 1993 Page 6 CWSL Response: The discharge permit application for the underdrain was submitted to the Colorado Department of Health, Water Quality Control Division on November 25, 1992. The CDH is now requesting additional information which CWSL is expeditiously preparing. Please contact Bill Hedberg at 330-2641 or Alan Scheere at 770-3324 if you have any questions about these responses. We appreciate the opportunity to meet with WCDH on January 20, 1993 and believe future meetings will facilitate our working relationship. Sincerely, C (2/ c Bill Hedberg Alan Scheere Division V.P. Landfill Operations Environmental Specialist cc: Roger Doak, CDH John Pickle, WCDH Chuck Cunliffe, WCPD Lee Morrison, Assistant County Attorney Weld County Commissoners: Constance Harbert, Chairman Bill Webster Dale Hall George Baxter Barbara Kirkmeyer M wp51 W\lepaAp2229311.wch P: CWSL 3.2.93 a 4.1.6.93 931061 • ni Dear Ms. Harbert, n. 53 Ashton -Daniels Community Action Group 3707 65th Ave. Greeley, CO 80634 March 6, 1993 We, the members of the Ashton -Daniels Community Action Group would like you to read these documents regarding Waste Management, Pages 19 and 20 "Garbage dumping and Waste Management's sham recycling efforts", could have been written about Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Also included is page 36 from another document, please notice the photo of severely eroding Waste Management's landfill on Chicago's Southeast Side. We sincerely hope you will read this manuscript and that you will cast your vote in favor of the preserving environment, Sincerely, Ashton -Daniels Community Group Many of WMI's "state-of-the-art,'. landfill designs employ a double -layer high -density polyethylene (HDPE) liner with leachate collection piping be- tween. In 1990 WMI purchased a minority interest in National Smeal, a privately held landfill liner manufacturer. (670) According to the Phillips Petroleum Company, a leading maker of polyethylene, there are a number of chemicals that can weaken polyethylene landfill liners. (628) Liners made out of clay also leak due to the ability of organic chemicals to permeate clay and shrinkage and ex- pansion from varying weather conditions. (632) CWM has also sought to weaken regulations governing hazardous waste landfills. On April 24, 1989, CWM won a decision from the U.S. Ap- pellate Court to drop a provision in regulations issued under the Resource Consen'ation and Recovery Act's "first -third" land -ban rule, a decision that effectively weakened leachate treatment standards. (633) CWM currently operates seven hazardous waste landfills in the U.S., including the nation's largest in Emelle, Alabama. What follows is a chronology of problems at CWM's hazardous waste landfills. CWM;} eroding CID landfill in Chicago's Southeast Side. Emeile, .4 WASTE MANAGEMENT INC.'S ENVIRONMENTAL CRIMES & MISDEEDS (k) An Abstract of A GREENPEACE REPORT 931.061 3 i • • INTRODUCTION Waste Management, Inc. (WMI) is the largest waste -hauling and disposal firm in the world; its total revenues exceeded six billion dollars ($6,000 million) in 1990. Obviously, managing waste is an exceedingly lucrative business. The very name of the company—WasteManagement—sug- gests that wastes can be safely controlled after they are created. Unfortu- nately, history reveals that this is not true. Once they are produced, dangerous wastes cannot be managed safely. No incinerator, landfill, or other method of waste disposal can protect fu- ture generations and the environment from hazardous chemicals, includ- ing the hazardous chemicals used in our homes every day (oven cleaner, paint thinner, pesticides, and so forth). The laws of physics dictate that disposal equals dispersal. Everything must go somewhere, and sooner or later, all wastes that are created will be released into the environment; waste disposal has caused steadily increasing contamination worldwide. The deepest oceans are contaminated; wildlife in remote Antarctica is contaminated; human breast milk is contaminated. While still in the womb, babies are contaminated. Pesticides, heavy metals, industrial sol- vents, and a dazzling spectrum of toast halocarbon compounds are now being measured in living creatures everywhere, and their concentration throughout the earth's environment is increasing relentlessly. Some of the damage caused by this widespread contamination has been docu- mented in scientific reports. Much awaits to be learned from future study. But this much is clear already: dousing our children, and all liv- ing things on the planet, with steadily increasing types and quantities of toxins cannot be beneficial. If humans are to survive, we must diminish our releases of chemicals into the environment. And this means we must rely less and less upon waste disposal technologies to remedy the waste crisis. This report is intended to help citizens understand the problem of waste disposal as it is practiced by one company, Waste Management, Inc., a leader in the waste -hauling and disposal business. The report is intended to help people protect their community not only from bad actors, but also from bad ideas. The lessons learned from this company have to do with the nature of the waste disposal industry as a whole —the use and promotion of dangerous technologies and the abuse of economic and political power. As we come to recognize that "state-of-the-art" waste dis- posal technologies don't work, even when practiced by the world's wealthi- est waste hauler, we must eventually recognize that the very idea of disposal is wasting our natural resources. People across America are taking direct action to protect themselves against companies like WMI. For example, in 1982, the Chickasaw Com- munity Affairs Group in Alabama mobilized and successfully stopped a proposed WMI toxic waste storage facility in the neighboring port of Mo- bile. Citizens worked to change local laws to close loopholes that EPA had used to help WMI establish its new facility. Since then, grassroots groups around the world have been stopping or stalling WMI with in- creasing success as the company's dismal record is exposed when the com- pany seeks opportunities to operate in new communities. People are willing to sacrifice momentary convenience for environmen- tal well-being, as poll after poll has shown. But the choice —and the infor- mation to understand that choice, both in the marketplace and the political arena —must be available. The grassroots movement for envi- ronmental justice works to protect the environment by practicing democ- Page 1 t.. , �, 921O61 • have become commonplace. Several years ago, concerned citizens began to ask, "If these problems are happening at so many facilities, could there be something wrong with the use of all waste disposal technologies?" That general concern has grown into a widespread recognition that "dis- posal equals dispersal" —all waste disposal technologies release contami- nants into the environment —and a powerful grassroots environmental protection movement now confronts WMl and other waste disposal com- panies wherever they turn. Meanwhile, the federal government has been going down a different track —trying to curb environmental destruction by creating a compli- cated web of rules and regulations to govern the generation and disposal of waste. Naturally, this government effort has been joined enthusiasti- cally by waste haulers like Waste Management, Inc., who profit from every pound of waste produced and who would be put out of business by serious efforts at waste reduction. Together, the coalition of waste haul- ers and government officials has created the myth of "safe" disposal, a myth bolstered by a vocabulary of catch -phrases such as "integrated waste management," "negligible risk," "state-of-the-art," and "best avail- able control technology (BACT)." These phrases are employed to promote unproven technologies, to hide the truth about the failures of existing technologies, and to divert attention away from the real solution to these problems: to reduce the use of toxic materials with an eye toward elimi- nating them entirely while employing cleaner, more efficient production processes. All "state-of-the-art waste disposal technologies" have failed to work as promised. Furthermore, phrases like "state-of-the-art" work against democratic decision -making because they invite the public to trust "the experts." These experts are usually company officials or hired consultants who have an interest in seeing the waste disposal industry expand or regulatory officials who feel justified in granting any permit if it meets written standards, no matter how inadequate those standards may be. One result has been a massive loss of faith in government's ability to pro- tect the public from polluters. The unholy alliance of waste haulers and government officials is now deeply entrenched in the fabric of American life. The regulatory attempt to make disposal safe has become a deeply entrenched approach to the problem of waste over the last two decades as the U.S. government has written sweeping waste disposal regulations. It is no coincidence that Waste Management, Inc.'s growth skyrocketed during this period. Many current Waste Management employees helped write federal and state en- vironmental .regulations when they worked as regulatory officials or as Congressional staff members. The general concept is so common, people have given it a name: the revolving door, through which government regu- lators become highly paid employees of the firms they used to regulate. Knowing that the future promises a lucrative pass through the revolving door, government officials would be fools to urge strict enforcement against violations by the waste -hauling industry. Probably the best- known example of the "revolving door" is the career of William Ruck- elshaus, who has twice served as chief of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and now is chief executive officer of Browning -Ferris Industries (BFI), the second largest hauler in America. But Mr. Ruck- elshaus represents only the tip of the iceberg. The web of government rules on waste disposal has not prevented mas- sive contamination of the environment, but it has benefitted companies Page 3 931061 WMI is the leader of an industry inherently at odds with such positive approaches to the toxics crisis. Without waste, the industry would have no business. Without increased waste generation, these companies could not grow. To maintain its status as one of the best buys on Wall Street, WMI requires a constant increase in waste. Its main line of business is at odds with the continued well-being of humans and other forms of life on earth. Waste Management's growth has also resulted from predatory behav- ior as the company has devoured its economic competition —usually smaller waste haulers and disposal firms —exerting its influence from the streets of small town America to the halls of Congress. In many in- stances the company has used illegal competitive tactics —bid -rigging, price-fixing, and allegedly even physical, threats —resulting in criminal and civil suits. In other instances, the company has simply bought out its competition or has positioned itself to underbid and squeeze out its com- petition for waste disposal services. Antitrust enforcement agencies are understaffed and usually lack the political will to stop WMI from moving toward monopoly. Even when the will exists, current laws provide au in- adequate deterrent to the company's practices. For a giant like WMI, en- vironmental penalties, antitrust penalties, and legal fees (many of which can be written off against taxes) are easily absorbed as normal costs of do- ing business —even when those penalties run into millions of dollars. The result of monopolization is that the company's customers, both house- holders and businesses, suffer artificially inflated costs. In this respect, the company's operations cause not only environmental deterioration but also economic decline. lucrative WMI's aggressive expansion strategy has been exceedingly for its directors and stockholders. Waste Management's top executives are among the U.S.'s highest paid, and the company's growth —now in- creasing at a billion -dollar -a -year clip —has thrust the firm toward the top of the U.S. corporate charts. In the 1990s, the company expects to increase its growth through inter- national expansion and diversification into specialized services. Chemi- cal Waste Management (CWM), the hazardous waste disposal subsidiary of WMI, for instance, expects to make Superfund site cleanup, and the cleanup of military bases and of contaminated nuclear weapons produc- tion sites, a big part of its business in the 1990s. Growth and profits in this business require the shipment of contamination from one community to another. CWM's Superfund cleanup division —the Environmental Re- medial Action division (ENRAC)—is handsomely paid for moving waste from contaminated sites around the country to other contaminated sites: to the Emelle, Alabama, landfill, for example, which continues to receive the largest share of Superfund waste in the country, even though it has been shown to be leaking. This shell game allows the government to claim that is has the situ- ation under control and is "doing something about it," allows Waste Man- agement and other companies like it to become fabulously wealthy (wealth which they then use to support re-election bids by sympathetic political candidates), while moving wastes out of middle-class communi- ties into poor communities (and more often than not into communities of racial and ethnic minorities). The last advantage of this shell game is that it allows responsible government officials —politicians and regula- tors alike —to avoid having to confront the real source of the waste prob- lem: the manufacturing places where raw materials are selected, where Page 5 SA061 g 4 • INTRODUCTION Waste Management, Inc. (WMI) is the largest waste -hauling and disposal firm in the world; its total revenues exceeded six billion dollars ($6,000 million) in 1990. Obviously, managing waste is an exceedingly lucrative business. The very name of the company —Waste Management --sug- gests that wastes can be safely controlled after they are created. Unfortu- nately, history reveals that this is not true. Once they are produced, dangerous wastes cannot be managed safely. No incinerator, landfill, or other method of waste disposal can protect fu- ture generations and the environment from hazardous chemicals, includ- ing the hazardous chemicals used in our homes every day (oven cleaner, paint thinner, pesticides, and so forth). The laws of physics dictate that disposal equals dispersal. Everything must go somewhere, and sooner or later, all wastes that are crested will be released into the environment; waste disposal has caused steadily increasing contamination worldwide. The deepest oceans are contaminated; wildlife in remote Antarctica is contaminated; human breast milk is contaminated. While still in the womb, babies are contaminated. Pesticides, heavy metals, industrial sol- vents, and a dazzling spectrum of toxic halocarbon compounds are now being measured in living creatures everywhere, and their concentration throughout the earth's environment is increasing relentlessly. Some of the damage caused by this widespread contamination has been docu- mented in scientific reports. Much awaits to be learned from future study. But this much is clear already: dousing our children, and all liv- ing things on the planet, with steadily increasing types and quantities of toxins cannot be beneficial. If humans are to survive, we must diminish our releases of chemicals into the environment. And this means we must rely less and less upon waste disposal technologies to remedy the waste crisis. This report is intended to help citizens understand the problem of waste disposal as it is practiced by one company, Waste Management, Inc., a leader in the waste -hauling and disposal business. The report is intended to help people protect their community not only from bad actors, but also from bad ideas. The lessons learned from this company have to do with the nature of the waste disposal industry as a whole --the use and promotion of dangerous technologies and the abuse of economic and political power. As we come to recognize that "state-of-the-art" waste dis- posal technologies don't work, even when practiced by the world's wealthi- est waste hauler, we must eventually recognize that the very idea of disposal is wasting our natural resources. People across America are taking direct action to protect themselves against companies like WMI. For example, in 1982, the Chickasaw Com- munity Affairs Group in Alabama mobilized and successfully stopped a proposed WMI toxic waste storage facility in the neighboring port of Mo- bile. Citizens worked to change local laws to close loopholes that EPA had used to help WMI establish its new facility. Since then, grassroots groups around the world have been stopping or stalling WMI with in- creasing success as the company's dismal record is exposed when the com- pany seeks opportunities to operate in new communities. People are willing to sacrifice momentary convenience for environmen- tal well-being, as poll after poll has shown. But the choice —and the infor- mation to understand that choice, both in the marketplace and the political arena —must be available. The grassroots movement for envi- ronmental justice works to protect the environment by practicing democ- U Page 1 sa1o6* 4/ • • racy. By producing this report we hope to provide citizens and decision makers with information in a form they can use. It is our hope that this report will help generate even more pressure to end WMI's attempts to site new disposal facilities and force decision mak- ers to look at the real solutions to the waste crisis. A well-informed, well - organized group of citizens can keep even a powerful adversary like WMI out of a community. This report, along with reports issued by other envi- ronmental organizations (such as the Citizen's Clearinghouse for Hazard- ous Wastes, which published their WMI Corporate Profile in 1988) is intended to provide information about the company to grassroots groups, enforcement officials, public employee unions and others who are faced with the company's operations in their community. In fact, without a lot of hard work by such people, our report would not have been possible. More and more, grassroots groups are cooperating with others, sharing information, and organizing strategies to prevent disposal companies such as WMI from gaining a foothold in their communities. WASTING AWAY Promoted as an enterprise that "profits by protecting the environment," WMI has become a primary actor in, and accessory to, the process of global contamination. The technologies employed by WM! are all inher- ently destructive; the company's only major line of business —waste dis- posal —severely damages the environment. Even wastes that are "recycled" eventually re-enter the environment, causing pollution through re -manufacturing processes and ultimate disposal. Because Waste Management thrives on the production of waste, the company spends enormous resources promoting the myth of "safe" waste disposal, which it usually calls "state-of-the-art waste disposal technology." The myth of safe disposal is used to persuade government agencies to allow WMI to create new dumps and incinerators or expand the capacity of old ones. The result is a diversion of attention and resources away from pro- duction -end preventive solutions to the waste crisis. Even if WMI operated as a model corporate citizen, its daily opera- tions would contribute in major ways to the destruction of the environ- ment. However, evidence suggests that WMI is not run as a model corporation. In fact, an in-depth study of WMI's corporate conduct re- veals a history of environmental and antitrust law violations, a history of attempts to gain illegitimate political influence, and a history of disre- spect for the communities where the company conducts business. In this sense, WMI not only destroys the natural environment, but also under- mines democratic decision -making from the local to the national level. Many local grassroots leaders can attest to the truth of this latter point. As used in WMI's public relations campaigns, "the environment" is often an abstract concept. But the environment is a tangible and diverse ecosystem that is integral to the lives and neighborhoods of real people — in real communities where WMI has demonstrated disregard for the con- cerns of residents. This Greenpeace report documents WMI's track record in many of these communities, focusing on the company's operations in - the United States, where the company has built an unrivaled waste dis- posal empire. Reports of environmental damage from landfills, incinerators, deep well injection sites, and other "state-of-the-art waste disposal operation? Page 2 931061 5 • • have become commonplace. Several years ago, concerned citizens began to ask, "If these problems are happening at so many facilities, could there be something wrong with the use of all waste disposal technologies?' That general concern has grown into a widespread recognition that "dis- posal equals dispersal" —all waste disposal technologies release contami- nants into the environment —and a powerful grassroots environmental protection movement now confronts WMI and other waste disposal com- panies wherever they turn. Meanwhile, the federal government has been going down a different track —trying to curb environmental destruction by creating a compli- cated web of rules and regulations to govern the generation and disposal of waste. Naturally, this government effort has been joined enthusiasti- cally by waste haulers like Waste Management, Inc., who profit from every pound of waste produced and who would be put out of business by serious efforts at waste reduction. Together, the coalition of waste haul- ers and government officials has created the myth of "safe" disposal, a myth bolstered by a vocabulary of catch -phrases such as "integrated waste management," "negligible risk," "state-of-the-art," and "best avail- able control technology (BACT)." These phrases are employed to promote unproven technologies, to hide the truth about the failures of existing technologies, and to divert attention away from the real solution to these problems: to reduce the use of toxic materials with an eye toward elimi- nating them entirely while employing cleaner, more efficient production processes. All "state-of-the-art waste disposal technologies" have failed to work as promised. Furthermore, phrases like "state-of-the-art" work against democratic decision -making because they invite the public to trust "the experts." These experts are usually company officials or hired consultants who have an interest in seeing the waste disposal industry expand or regulatory officials who feel justified in granting any permit if it meets written standards, no matter how inadequate those standards may be. One result has been a massive loss of faith in government's ability to pro- tect the public from polluters. The unholy alliance of waste haulers and government officials is now deeply entrenched in the fabric of American life. The regulatory attempt to make disposal safe has become a deeply entrenched approach to the problem of waste over the last two decades as the U.S. government has written sweeping waste disposal regulations. It is no coincidence that Waste Management, Inc.'s growth skyrocketed during this period. Many current Waste Management employees helped write federal and state en- vironmental regulations when they worked as regulatory officials or as Congressional staff members. The general concept is so common, people have given it a name: the revolving door, through which government regu- lators become highly paid employees of the firms they used to regulate. Knowing that the future promises a lucrative pass through the revolving door, government officials would be fools to urge strict enforcement against violations by the waste -hauling industry. Probably the best- known example of the "revolving door" is the career of William Ruck- elshaus, who has twice served as chief of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and now is chief executive officer of Browning -Ferris Industries (BFI), the second largest hauler in America. But Mr. Ruck- elshaus represents only the tip of the iceberg. The web of government rules on waste disposal has not prevented mas- sive contamination of the environment, but it has benefitted companies a Page 3 931061 like Waste Management and BFI enormously. Waste producers who can't meet on -site disposal regulations now hire commercial waste disposal firms, such as Waste Management, Inc., to take wastes off their hands, in- stead of looking for ways to eliminate wastes entirely through prevention. By playing hardball with communities, Waste Management finds loca- tions —often in sparsely populated rural areas where the local people are naive, politically weak, and financially needy —to dispose of the gener- ators unwanted, dangerous wastes. The existence of a politically powerful, slick, and wealthy waste dis- posal industry has encouraged the generation and disposal of increasing amounts and types of waste. Despite (in a sense, even because of)10,000 pages of rules and regulations now governing waste disposal, annual gen- eration of hazardous waste in the U.S. is doubling every 12 years. As a result, incentives for waste reduction have actually diminished because the oversight of more and more commercial waste dumps and incinera- tors has sapped the resources of government agencies. Although some waste -generating companies have gained a competitive advantage by eliminating wastes and have even profitted in the process, most compa- nies have come to rely upon the waste disposal industry in order to com- ply with environmental regulations. As a result, the waste disposal industry is one of the fastest growing sectors of the U.S. economy. In the aggregate, the cost for waste disposal and pollution control in America amounted to $90 billion in 1987 and is expected to more than double by the end of the 1990s. The myth of safe disposal has prevented government officials from looking into the manufacturing processes where wastes originate. Gov- ernment officials ignore raw materials and manufacturing techniques — the fundamental sources of pollution. The myth of safe disposal has also allowed regulators to avoid banning toxic materials and unsafe technolo- gies. WMI has played a major part in maintaining the myth of safe dis- posal, and in helping political officials see things in the same light. The great size of WMI's political contributions and the pervasiveness of its ad- vertising reveal how important the myth of safe disposal is to the com- pany's growth and survival. In the 1988 elections, WMI had the seventh largest corporate PAC in America. So long as WMI and other waste industry giants are allowed to influence elections, elected officials can be expected to avoid fundamental solutions to the waste crisis, no matter how tragic the consequences in terms of public health, economic cost, and environmental damage. Contamination by toxic chemicals is increasing relentlessly. But there are exceptions to the rule. Where unsafe materials have been banned, contamination levels are diminishing. In the U.S. the banning of DDT, lead (in gasoline), and PCBs has taught us that prevention works. The great gaps in knowledge about the effects of pollutants (gaps that will never be closed, so long as we allow between 1000 and 2000 new chemi- cals to enter commercial channels each year) should lead to a cautious ap- proach to expanding the use of dangerous materials and polluting technologies. Global warming, destruction of the planet's ozone shield, acid rain, loss of many wildlife species, and indisputable evidence of wide- spread contamination of humans should serve as stark warnings. It is be- coming increasingly clear that long-term sustainability requires a resolute commitment to dean technology and safe materials —and to drastically reduced reliance on waste disposal. Page 4 1 9m106* WMI is the leader of an industry inherently at odds with such positive approaches to the toxics crisis. Without waste, the industry would have no business. Without increased waste generation, these companies could not grow. To maintain its status as one of the best buys on Wall Street, WMI requires a constant increase in waste. Its main line of business is at odds with the continued well-being of humans and other forms of life on earth. Waste Management's growth has also resulted from predatory behav- ior as the company has devoured its economic competition —usually smaller waste haulers and disposal firms —exerting its influence from the streets of small town America to the halls of Congress. In many in- stances the company has used illegal competitive tactics---bid-rigging, price-fixing, and allegedly even physical threats —resulting in criminal and civil suits. In other instances, the company has simply bought out its competition or has positioned itself to underbid and squeeze out its com- petition for waste disposal services. Antitrust enforcement agencies are understaffed and usually lack the political will to stop WMI from moving toward monopoly. Even when the will exists, current laws provide as in- adequate deterrent to the company's practices. For a giant like WMI, en- vironmental penalties, antitrust penalties, and legal fees (many of which can be written off against taxes) are easily absorbed as normal costs of do- ing business —even when those penalties run into millions of' dollars. The result of monopolization is that the company's customers, both house- holders and businesses, suffer artificially inflated costs. In this respect, the company's operations cause not only environmental deterioration but also economic decline. WMI's aggressive expansion strategy has been exceedingly lucrative for its directors and stockholders. Waste Management's top executives are among the U.S.'s highest paid, and the company's growth —now in- creasing at a billion -dollar -a -year clip —has thrust the firm toward the top of the U.S. corporate charts. In the 1990s, the company expects to increase its growth through inter- national expansion and diversification into specialized services. Chemi- cal Waste Management (CWM), the hazardous waste disposal subsidiary of WMI, for instance, expects to make Superfund site cleanup, and the cleanup of military bases and of contaminated nuclear weapons produc- tion sites, a big part of its business in the 1990s. Growth and profits in this business require the shipment of contamination from one community to another. CWM's Superfund cleanup division —the Environmental Re- medial Action division (ENRAC)—is handsomely paid for moving waste from contaminated sites around the country to other contaminated sites: to the Emelle, Alabama, landfill, for example, which continues to receive the largest share of Superfund waste in the country, even though it has . been shown to be leaking. This shell game allows the government to claim that is has the situ- ation under control and is "doing something about it," allows Waste Man- agement and other companies like it to become fabulously wealthy (wealth which they then use to support re-election bids by sympathetic political candidates), while moving wastes out of middle-class communi- ties into poor communities (and more often than not into communities of racial and ethnic minorities). The last advantage of this shell game is that it allows responsible government officials —politicians and regula- tors alike —to avoid having to confront the real source of the waste prob- lem: the manufacturing places where raw materials are selected, where Page 5 •7.;a-!.sy manufacturing techniques are devised, and where products are made. Government does not want to reach its hand into this arena, which corpo- rate management has traditionally viewed as entirely its own. So, in- stead, government forms coalitions with the polluters against the local citizenry, runs interference for the polluters so they never have to con- front the victims of their handiwork, helping the waste haulers develop and license new dumps and incinerators, and enthusiastically promotes the myth of safe disposal. Until government abandons the myth of safe disposal and begins to recognize that companies like Waste Management, Inc., are a major part of the problem, and not part of the solution, global environmental destruc- tion will continue to accelerate. WMI AT A GLANCE ECONOMIC MALPRACTICE FOR PROFIT Waste Management Inc. is the world's largest waste disposal company. Its annual revenue grew from 76 million dollars in 1971 to 6 billion dol- lars in 1990. It ranks 19th in the Fortune 500 list of the largest diversi- fied service companies in the U.S. It hauls garbage from almost eight million households in the U.S., in over 1350 communities. It operates over 128 landfills in at least 36 states. (1) Each landfill is a time bomb in the earth, waiting to poison future generations when it begins to leak. According to a Prudential-Bache securities analyst, WMI's subsidiary, Chemical Waste Management (CWM), is the largest hazardous waste dis- • posal company in the U.S. CWM controls up to one-third of the entire U.S. commercial hazardous waste treatment and disposal capacity. CWM's revenues doubled in the late 1980s, and the company earned over one billion dollars in revenue in 1990. (1) WMI also controls the largest nuclear waste disposal firm in the U.S. (Chem -Nuclear), owns 49 percent of the U.S.'s largest asbestos removal company (Brand Industries), and owns 55 percent of the U.S.'s largest garbage incineration firm (WNheelabrator Technologies). Waste Management', growth is achieved mainly by devouring its com- petitors —smaller waste haulers and disposal firms —from the streets of Milwaukee, Wisconsin, to Venezuela. In some cases their tactics —which reportedly include bid -rigging, predatory pricing, price-fixing, and alleg- edly even physical threats —have resulted in criminal and civil suits. The corporation's growth has paid WMI's executives handsomely. WMI's president, Philip Rooney, earned $14,276,000 in 1987. Donald Flynn, a WMI senior vice president, received $13,217,000 in 1987, and Dean Buntrock, the Chief Executive Officer of WMI, was the highest paid CEO in Illinois in 1988. (2) Mere fate and providence have not guided the transformation of an ob- scure regional garbage hauler into a powerful global waste disposal jug- gernaut. To create an empire, the company has mixed business acumen and foresight with strong doses of deception, corruption, and monopolism. The company, its subsidiaries, and its employees have faced antitrust lawsuits or government investigations in at least 17 states. Since 1980, WMI, its subsidiaries, and its employees have paid more than $28 million r Page 6 931061 g. in fines or settlements for price-fixing, bid -rigging, and other allegedly il- legal means of discouraging competition. (This figure includes out -of - court settlements in which WMI pays its adversaries what they ask but does not admit any wrongdoing.) Here are some examples: In March 1989, WMI of California was fined $1,000,000 for conspir- ing against trade. Los Angeles' district attorney described this as the biggest criminal antitrust case in California's history.' WMI of California conspired with other haulers to eliminate competition, to not touch each others' business and to use below -cost "blitzes" to lure customers from businesses that did not go along with the trade conspirators. (10) In October 1988, the supervisor of garbage disposal for the city of New Orleans alleged that officials of WMI's New Orleans subsidiary warned him and a colleague that they would wear "cement boots" and "meet their maker" if they persisted in investigating garbage disposal overcharges. After investigating the allegations, the U.S. Attorney did not file charges. (9) In October 1987, subsidiaries of WMI were fined $1,000,000 by the U.S. Justice Department for conspiring with Browning -Ferris Indus- tries=the second largest waste hauler in America after WMI—to fix prices and divide markets in the Toledo, Ohio, area. The compa- nies involved, including Waste Management of North America, also split a $700,000 fine paid to the state of Ohio. (7) • In April 1986, David floopengardner, the manager of WMrs Florida subsidiary, United Sanitation Services, was sentenced to two years probation and fined $10,500 for price-fixing and customer allocation (that is, illegally divvying up customers with other haulers). WMI then transferred him to a Caracas, Venezuela, subsidiary, where he could avoid having to report to probation officials. Later he was fired. (6) • In January 1988, a subsidiary of Waste Management Inc. of Florida was fined $1,000,000 after pleading "no contest" to charges of in- volvement in a conspiracy to keep prices fixed at artificially high and non-competitive levels and for other antitrust activities. (8) This case stemmed from the same facts charged against Hoopen- gardner. • In 1983, WMI's wholly owned subsidiary, Georgia Waste Systems, was convicted of conspiring to fix prices, and fined $350,000. The company's former general manager was also found guilty and sen- tenced to a one-year jail term, with all but 45 days suspended. WMI refused to fire the official, proclaiming his innocence. Although ac- cording to a 1981 FBI memo, illegal activities at Georgia Waste Sys- tems "were probably directed by corporate officials from the NMI] company headquarters," the parent company and senior executives were never charged with antitrust violations. (5) The victims of these criminal activities are the people who pay WMI to take their trash away. Ira Reiner, the district attorney for Los Angeles, has said, "the crime here amounts to a theft from the public...wao are pay- ing artificially high fees to have their trash hauled away. The high prices are ultimately passed along to the public." (11) 7 Records in the 1988 antitrust case that led to a $1,000,000 fine for WMI alleged that the company and other haulers in southern Florida "carted off more than 2.5 million dollars in the past ten years through overcharges and other suspect billings," according to newspaper ac- 3 counts. (86) In Toledo, Ohio, where WMI was convicted of an antitrust conspiracy and fined $1,000,000 in 1987 for price-fixing and other anti- trust violations, customers included dozens of schools and even a convent. (12) Because of these convictions and settlements, WMI and its subsidiar- ies face potential bans from eligibility in bidding on new contracts in sev- eral U.S. cities and states including Chicago, IL; Palmer, MA; and the state of Florida. Many federal, state and local laws prohibit governments from hiring or contracting with convicted criminals. The laws allow com- panies to be barred from government contracts when the company has a record of repeated violations of laws and regulations, WMI CASE STUDY: WMI was formed in 1968 when Dean Buntrock's midwestern U.S.-based SEEDS OF waste -hauling Arms, Ace Scavenger and Atlas Refuse Disposal, merged with Florida -based CORRUPTION Ace and Atlas had been taccusehern d of belongnowned assocciaH. titionns of ash a, hauling companies that allegedly used strong-arm tactics against their competitors. In 1962, the State of Wisconsin filed a suit in the Milwaukee Circuit Court against 11 hauling companies and their owners for illegally re- straining competition.' Dean Buntrock and his Ace Scavenger Co. were sued for allegedly engaging in a "conspiracy to restrain trade, to willingly injure the business of others, to hinder others from performing lawful acts, and an attempt to monopolize the rubbish collection, waste removal or disposal business in and around Milwaukee County."(3) Buntrock and the owners of the other ten waste haulers were jointly accused of having "threatened physical harm to the owners of competing ffirmsi...and their families and destruction or damage to their property and equipment, or threatened to haul all their accounts for nothing" if they competed against the accused firms. (3) The practice of'lowballing"- -offering to haul wastes for such a low fee that no one can compete —is re- portedly a common anti -competitive practice in the waste -hauling industry. After a customer has been won over, the rates can then be raised. TheMilwukee rcuit against the accused firms, which prescribed for e eight temporary ea ar3' injunction e charges were finally dismissed in 1970, after Ace and many of the other accused gar- bage firms became subsidiaries of the newly formed Waste Management,. Inc. Buntrock faced similar legal problems in Chicago, where a local trade association, Chicago Refuse Corp., was sued in 1971 for allegedly price- fixing and harassing competitors since 1965. Ace Scavenger, the WMI subsidiary, was a member of the association. Chicago Refuse paid $50,000 to settle the suit in a consent decree, which neither admits nor denies guilt. (4) Page 8 t II I 331061 // CORRUPION OF THE ENEMY POLLUTED POLITICS WMI complements its business dealings with a massive effbrt seeking to legitimize itself with environmentalists, politicians, and regulatory offi- cials. It has successfully used the power of money to capture the favor of potential enemies. WMI purchases goodwill through glitzy TV and news- paper public relations blitzes and through cash gifts: to Congress, where it lobbies for legislation favorable to the company; to federal agencies, where it seeks to manipulate the drafting and implementation of disposal rules; to national environmental organizations, where it seeks to gain the veneer of legitimacy; and even to local chapters of organizations like the League of Women Voters and the Boy Scouts in communities where the company wants to haul or dump wastes. The company and its officials have been willing to pay almost any price for assistance from politicians. WMI and its employees have paid politi- cians hundreds of thousands of dollars annually through speaking fees, campaign contributions, "Christmas gifts," and bribes. Whenever local politicians help WMI set up shop somewhere (to expand an old dump, for example), those politicians' favorite charities soon may be receiving a sub- stantial contribution from WMI—a perfectly legal way of purchasing in- fluence at the local level and of undermining the democratic process. WMI began using the power of cash to influence politicians early in its history. Between 1972 and 1974, according to a federal Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) investigation, a unit of WMI operated a se- cret slush fund for unlawful political contributions in Florida, and WMI or its subsidiaries gave away about $36,000 in "dubious outlays" from un- recorded cash received in the course of doing business. (13) WMI has become of one of the main corporate financiers of U.S. con- gressional campaigns in the United States. The WMI Employees' "Better Government Fund" was the seventh largest corporate political action com- mittee (PAC) during the 1988 U.S. elections, giving over $430,000 to can- didates for U.S. Congress from 1987 to 1988. (14) Untold additional funds went to politicians from WMI subsidiary PACs and directly from WMI stockholders, employees, and their relatives. In addition, WMI paid members of the U.S. Congress $57,500 for speeches and appearances in 1985, ranking tenth among corporations giv- ing such "honoraria." It once paid U.S. Representative Walter Jones of North Carolina $2,000 for a speech to WMI officials in which he an- nounced that he personally would oppose legislation that would delay WMI's plans to burn toxic wastes on an incinerator ship in the Atlantic Ocean. (15) Money equals power on Capitol Hill, and Waste Management has pur- chased substantial influence over waste policy legislation in Congress. The company's generosity to politicians is often even more obvious at the local level, in city balls and state legislatures. WMI has learned, that a few thousand dollars can secure and protect disposal arrangements worth millions. • In 1988, Philip Elfstrom, the president of the Kane County, Illinois, Forest Commission accepted donations from WMI to help his bid for a National Association of Counties (NACO). Elfstrom had pre- viously claimed under oath that he never accepted donations from Page 9 831.061 l)- WMI. Elfstrom helps supervise a county -owned landfill operated by WMI. (23) • Also in 1988, former Chicago City Alderman Edward Vrdolyak ad- mitted that he used WM1-owned airplanes for free flights from Chi- cago to his house in Florida. While Vrdolyak was in office, he helped ensure the siting and expansion of WMI waste dumps and a hazard- ous waste incinerator in his political district. Vrdolyak was no longer in office in 1990, but WMI continued to contribute thousands of dollars to political funds controlled by him. (24) • That same year, in Alabama, where CWM operates the largest toxic waste dump in North America, the company gave $2,500 to mem- bers of a state House committee that killed toxic waste measures dis- couraging waste shipments to the landfill. In 1985, CWM sent $500 checks as "Christmas presents" to numerous other Alabama legisla- tors. (17) - In 1986, John Horak, the general manager of a WMI subsidiary, was jailed for six months for giving $12,000 in bribes to a Fox Lake, Illi- nois, mayor and a Village Board member. Horak stated that the bribes had the approval of top WMI officials including James De - Boer, a WMI vice president. (22) • Sometimes influence comes cheap. A former Margate City, Florida, commissioner testified in court that he sold his vote on a 1979 city garbage contract to WMI for $3,000. Charges against the commis- sioner were later dismissed. (16) WMI CASE STUDY: The Chicago area, the hub of WMI's empire, has been crisscrossed by SWEET HOME WMI officials offering government officials gifts in exchange for favorable political decisions. In addition to the case involving Chicago City Alder - CHICAGO man Edward Vrdolyak (see above), other bribes and "gifts" given to Chi- cago area politicians have included: • In 1986, WMI lobbyist Raymond Akers pleaded guilty of mail fraud and of charges that he paid $6,500 in bribes to Chicago City Alder- man Clifford Kelley. Akers stated he "participated with certain cor- porate officers of Waste Management in conferring secret benefits from Waste Management to certain office holders." (21, 87) • In 1981.82, WMI gave Chicago mayor Jane Byrne $13,000 in cam- paign contributions while she extended certain WMI waste -hauling contracts. (19) • Between 1972 and 1975, WMI hired Chicago -area politician Patrick O'Block for $55,885 to "neutralize any adverse community or politi- cal reaction" to a landfill. (18) REGULATORS Cozy relationships between WMI and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) have transformed the agency from one that protects the en- vironment to an advocate for the waste disposal industry. Though official policy favors pollution prevention, regulatory practices focus solely on Page 10 • 931064 • • waste control, encouraging a bull market for waste disposal companies. In many cases, these regulations have been authored by EPA officials who later turned to WMI for lucrative, post -governmental employment. Anticipation of these positions also encourages the EPA to circumvent public accountability and scientific evidence in favor of industry in waste disposal siting battles throughout the country. At least seven former:up EPA officials have been hired by WMI and CWM. For example, Walt Barber, a CWM vice president, once was the acting administrator of EPA; Gary Dietrich, a WMI consultant, once helped write solid waste disposal regulations for the EPA's Office of Solid Waste; Jeffrey Miller, a WMI attorney, once directed EPA's enforcement division; and Joan Bernstein, a CWM vice president, once was EPA's Gen- eral Counsel. WMI CASE STUDY EPA & CWM WORK HAND IN GLOVE :The public policy impact of this "revolving door" between EPA and WMI was clear in the early 1980s, when well -placed CWM employees helped write EPA's ocean incineration and liquid waste disposal permits. In Oc- tober 1981, the EPA issued a permit for a series of "research" burns of millions of gallons of PCB wastes aboard CWM's incinerator ship, Vulca- nus I. It was later learned that CWM lobbyist Scott Clarkson helped write the research permit. One EPA official said, "CWM wrote the per- mit. There was no research protocol." (25) At the same time, an attorney for CWM, James Sanderson, was in a perfect position to influence EPA agency decisions. He worked as Special Assistant to EPA Administrator Anne Gorsuch from March to July 1981 and from October 1981 to June 1982. Before, between, and after his em- ployments at EPA, Sanderson was an attorney for CWM in Colorado. Sanderson quit EPA in June 1982 after senior White House officials re- portedly urged Gorsuch to fire him for unethical conduct and potentially criminal conflict -of -interest violations. In February 1982, after Gorsuch lifted a ban on dumping liquid wastes in hazardous waste dumps across the country, CWM dumped 2,491 barrels of liquid hazardous wastes in its Colorado toxic waste landfill. CWM had "stored" 1434 of the barrels • in disposal pits at the Colorado site in anticipation of Gorsuch's ruling. (26) WMI AND The "revolving door" to WMI's corporate riches is open even to environ- ENVIRONMENTAL mental groups in the U.S. As with regulatory agencies and politicians. many "environmentalists" have established close relationships with WMI GROUPS in exchange for cash. WMI's corporate "grants" to environmental and conservation groups to- taled more than $892,000 between 1987 and 1989. (27) In turn, WWII's association with a variety of large environmental groups serves to im-' prove the company's public profile and to disarm its potential opposition. The company has given the following environmental groups $50,000 or more in grants since 1987: National Audubon Society ($110,000) National Wildlife Federation ($102,500) Page 11 S3 Z1061 WMI CASE STUDY: THE NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION MEDIATES FOR WMI The Nature Conservancy ($70,000) International Union for the Conservation of Nature ($51,000) World Wildlife Fund/Conservation Foundation ($50,000) Some groups even have WMI executives on their board of directors. In 1987, the National Wildlife Federation (NWF) elected WMI's chief execu- tive officer, Dean Buntrock, to its Board of Directors. Alexander Trow- bridge, a director of WMI, serves on the U.S. national council of the World Wildlife Fund. Waste Management president Phillip Rooney sits on the Board of Directors of the National Audubon Society. Fortunately, not all environmental groups have allowed themselves to' be infiltrated by WMI. For the past few years, WMI has been trying to gain acceptance as the first for-profit member of the Environmental Grantmakers Association (EGA), a three -year -old association of about 90 foundations that help support many environmental activist groups in the U.S. When WMI Environmental Affairs Director William Y. Brown was in- vited to EGA's 1988 meeting, several grantmakers refused to participate. Finally, in 1989, -the EGA voted to disqualify WMI from membership, cit- ing corporate practices "contrary to the Association's fundamental goals and aspirations....It is readily apparent that WMI has engaged in a pat- tern of abusive corporate conduct involving repeated violations of both criminal and civil laws, with the effect of endangering and degrading the environment." (29) Similar rejections came from a church and a citizens' group in Chi- cago's economically poor southeast side. In the spring of 1987, St. Kevins Church and the United Neighborhood Organization rejected WMI's offers to donate food for the hungry because the offer was perceived as an effort to buy off community opposition to the company's waste disposal opera- tions. St. Kevins Church is located near a pollution -plagued hazardous waste dump and incinerator operated by WMI. (30) The purpose of WMI's "generosity" is perhaps best described by WMI executive Joseph Jack. After WMI distributed over $25,000 in scholar- ships to 115 southern Florida high school students, Jack explained, "When they grow up, they can't say anything nasty about Waste Manage- ment because maybe we made it possible for them to go to college." (31) The value of such ties to environmental groups became clear last year when National Wildlife Federation president Jay Hair set up a breakfast meeting between WMI and EPA Administrator William Reilly; sub- sequently Reilly reversed national policy, taking aggressive steps to pre- vent states from enacting environmental regulations that are more stringent than federal rules, an effort later overruled by a judge as violat- ing basic legal principles. In March 1989, Hair arranged a breakfast meeting between Buntrock and Reilly with the stated purpose of discussing the national implications of a recent decision by North Carolina's state government to restrict waste dumping into rivers and streams. Hair's invitation to Reilly read: "Bill —if at all possible I would like to arrange a breakfast meeting with you, Dean Buntrock and myself to discuss [the] national implication of" the North Carolina situation. WMI prepared a briefing paper for Reilly, 4 3 4 I 4 4 I t Page 12 9146.1 /5. which asked him to "emphatically restate [EPA] opposition to these states actions" by threatening to withdraw North Carolina's authority to legislate hazardous waste policy. One month after the March 16, 1989 breakfast meeting, Reilly an- nounced that EPA would re -open hearings on whether to withdraw North Carolina's hazardous waste disposal authorization. NWF's Hair has frequently denied any role in Reilly's decision, and publicly opposed it. However, EPA's Reilly expressed surprisethat Hair opposed the North Carolina hearings, because "Jay Hair hosted the [March meeting with Buntrock] at which I was lobbied to do the very thing that we are doing." An investigation conducted by the EPA inspec- tor general, John C. Martin, was itself called into question by J. Richard Wagner, an official in the EPA inspector general's office. The Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee of the House Energy and Commerce Committee opened an investigation into the matter, but their investiga- tion was never completed. (28) POLLUTING FOR THE MODERN INDUSTRIAL ECONOMY While WMI is integral to the U.S. government's strategy of ensuring plen- tiful waste disposal capacity, public concern over pollution has forced regulators to appear to be penalizing the polluters. Government agencies have fined WMI repeatedly for violations of environmental regulations. These fines do not reflect the true cost of damage done to the environ- ment by the company's disposal operations, nor do they reflect the profits made from such violations. However, the frequency of these penalties shows that, even under a permissive regulatory climate, WMI's crimes are so obvious that government officials cannot avoid penalizing their friends. WMI has thus set the U.S. record for environmentally related penal- ties and settlements in the 1980s. Greenpeace estimates that since 1980. WMI has paid over $45,000,000 in fines, penalties, and out -of -court settle- ments for admitted and alleged violations of environmental laws at its dump sites. At least 45 WMI waste sites have been found out of compliance with federal or state environmental regulations. At least five WMI sites have closed. At least ten WMI dump sites have contaminated groundwater. By the end of 1989, WMI was listed as a Potentially Responsible Party at 96 sites on the U.S. Superfund National Priority List, while its subsidiary Chemical Waste Management was listed for 25. Although WMI claims these are problems of the past, there are no signs that pollution violations are decreasing at WMI dump sites. Accord- ing to newspaper reports, WMI was issued at least 547 citations and or- ders for pollution violations between 1980 and 1983. Between 1984 and 1987, this number reportedly increased to 632. (33) Statistics such as these drive insurers away from WMI and from all others in the waste business. Because of the company's potentially disas- trous operational deficiencies, WMI has operated without meaningful out- side liability insurance for its hazardous waste sites for years. This could impact the company's long-term viability. In a 1990 report to the Securi- ties and Exchange Commission, WMI admitted that if "the Company con- tinues to be unsuccessful in obtaining risk -transfer Environmental L Page 13 931061 /(a, • • which asked him to "emphatically restate [EPA) opposition to these states actions" by threatening to withdraw North Carolina's authority to legislate hazardous waste policy. One month after the March 16,1989 breakfast meeting, Reilly an- nounced that EPA would re -open hearings on whether to withdraw North Carolina's hazardous waste disposal authorization. NWF's Hair has frequently denied any role in Reilly's decision, and publicly opposed it. However, EPA's Reilly expressed surprise that Hair opposed the North Carolina hearings, because "Jay Hair hosted the [March meeting with Buntrock] at which I was lobbied to do the very thing that we are doing." An investigation conducted by the EPA inspec- tor general, John C. Martin, was itself called into question by J. Richard Wagner, an official in the EPA inspector general's office. The Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee of the House Energy and Commerce Committee opened an investigation into the matter, but their investiga- tion was never completed. (28) POLLUTING FOR THE MODERN INDUSTRIAL ECONOMY While WMI is integral to the U.S. government's strategy of ensuring plen- tiful waste disposal capacity, public concern over pollution has forced regulators to appear to be penalizing the polluters. Government agencies have fined WMI repeatedly for violations of environmental regulations. These fines do not reflect the true cost of damage done to the environ- ment by the company's disposal operations, nor do they reflect the profits made from such violations. However, the frequency of these penalties shows that, even under a permissive regulatory climate, WMI's crimes are so obvious that government officials cannot avoid penalizing their friends. WMI has thus set the U.S. record for environmentally related penal- ties and settlements in the 1980s. Greenpeace estimates that since 1980, W1vII has paid over $45,000,000 in fines, penalties, and out -of -court settle- ments for admitted and alleged violations of environmental laws at its dump sites. At least 45 WMI waste sites have been found out of compliance with federal or state environmental regulations. At least five WMI sites have closed. At least ten WMI dump sites have contaminated groundwater. By the end of 1989, WMI was listed as a Potentially Responsible Party at 96 sites on the U.S. Superfund National Priority List, while its subsidiary Chemical Waste Management was listed for 25. Although WMI claims these are problems of the past, there are no signs that pollution violations are decreasing at WMI dump sites. Accord- ing to newspaper reports, WMI was issued at least 547 citations and or- ders for pollution violations between 1980 and 1983. Between 1984 and 1987, this number reportedly increased to 632. (33) Statistics such as these drive insurers away from WMI and from all others in the waste business. Because of the company's potentially disas- trous operational deficiencies, WMI has operated without meaningful out- side liability insurance for its hazardous waste sites for years. This could impact the company's long-term viability. In a 1990 report to the Securi- ties and Exchange Commission, WMI admitted that if "the Company con- tinues to be unsuccessful in obtaining risk -transfer Environmental L Page 13 331061 / waste analysis plan. More importantly, IEPA said that on "several occa- sions" IEPA officials investigating the explosion were "refused informa- tion about what chemicals were being burned at the time of the explosion. Furthermore, the IEPA charged that WMI had made "inaccu- rate statements" when WMI said they had reported the explosion to the Illinois Attorney General's office. (83) Another major CWM toxic waste incinerator is located in Sauget, Illi- nois. Dirty operations there, too, have forced the state to fine CWNI for environmental violations. In February 1990, Illinois fined CWM $250,000 for operating the incinerator for four days without a stack gas hydrocarbon monitor and for other violations, such as bunting waste faster than permitted. (41) Operations began at CWM's newest incinerator, in Port Arthur, Texas, this year. CWM plans to eventually burn three times the waste at this fa- cility than at any other CWM incinerator complex. CWM is trying to build or purchase hazardous waste incinerators throughout the U.S.—in Alabama, California, Georgia, Kentucky, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oregon, and Tennessee. (42) WMI's rush to burn toxic wastes in incinerators across the country fol- lows its failed, hard-fought attempt to burn toxic wastes at sea in a flo- tilla of incinerator ships. WMI would have preferred to avoid local community battles and burn industry's wastes at sea, out of public view. The company's limited and now -extinct ocean incineration program in the U.S. and its nearly extinct incineration of wastes in the North Sea prove that even in the middle of the ocean, WMI cannot avoid opposition to the severe environmental impacts caused by its disposal operations. Strong evidence of pollution from incinerator ships led the world's govern- ments, under the London Dumping Convention, to collectively ban ocean incineration by 1994. Household and Hospital Wastes WMI is also constructing a national network of incinerators to burn gar- bage and medical wastes. WMI recently purchased control of the largest garbage incinerator firm in the U.S., Wheelabrator Technologies, and hopes to burn garbage in 80 incinerators on land adjacent to its garbage landfills. It's a marriage made in heaven: 30 percent of the waste that bur- ied nearby.' WMI's control of so many landfills makes ash disposalfrom Wheelabrator incinerators a natural. At least 10 garbage incinerators in the U.S. are currently operated by WMI and Wheelabrator. (43) WMI refers to its first garbage incinerator, built in 1986 in Tampa, Florida, in the same manner as its hazardous waste incinerator in Chi- cago: "state-of-the-art." Sadly, the state of the art is not good. The Tampa incinerator has been plagued by air emissions, toxic runoff from incinerator ash, and financial disappointment for the city of Tampa. The Florida Department of Environmental Regulations has ordered WMI to prevent toxic ash runoff from flowing into a ditch that runs into the Crilf of Mexico. As in Chicago, operators of the Tampa incinerator were reluctant to turn on pollution control equipment. For 17 months, WMI refused to op- erate air pollution control equipment when turning on the furnace. (44) Page 15 S21061 /1 Medical waste incinerators, like garbage burners, routinely discharge extremely tote dioxins, furans, lead, and mercury into the atmosphere. They also emit small amounts of radioactive waste. Incineration pre- cludes more environmentally benign medical waste disposal options such as steam sterilization, and discourages the implementation of programs to separate infectious wastes from harmless, recyclable hospital waste streams. (Infectious waste generally represents just 15 percent of the waste that is burned in medical waste incinerators). (45) WMI operates at least seven medical waste incinerators, and plans to own a total of 19 in the U.S. (46) In this field, too, operations have been troubled. In March 1989, state of Ohio inspectors uncovered three environmen- tal violations at WMI's medical waste incinerator in Jackson Township, Ohio. Potentially toxic runoff was draining off the storage area, incinera- tor dust was blowing out of containment boxes, and the incinerator was operating without a valid solid waste disposal license. (47) Shortly after WMI signed a 10 -year lease from the city of Terrell, Texas, for an old idle incinerator, it ran into numerous legal problems. In October 1988, the Texas Department of Health opposed WMI's attempt to burn infectious waste in an incinerator that had not previously inciner- ated such waste. WMI began burning medical waste, without a valid air permit, on October 12, 1989. By December 1989, the Texas Air Control Board ruled that WMI could operate the facility, though not on a full- time basis. (48) "SAVING A HELL OF A LOT OF MONEY" Deep Well Injection Loopholes in U.S. hazardous waste regulations have made deep well injec- tion the cheapest and most poorly monitored waste disposal method. De- spite little understanding of the long-term fate and effect of chemicals in geological formations, waste disposal companies drill a deep hole in the earth and inject huge quantities of pressurized waste into underground layers of permeable rock. Injection wells are known to have caused groundwater contamination, well blow -outs, and even sizeable earthquakes. Leakage and geologic events will become more likely as time passes and wastes migrate further from injection wells. Despite these environmental hazards, legal loopholes in U.S. waste dis- posal laws have allowed CWM to inject millions of gallons of extremely hazardous wastes into the earth, particularly in Ohio and Texas. Since 1982, CWM's Corpus Christi, Texas, toxic waste injection well has been found to be in violation of environmental laws in 10 of 18 inspec- tions by the state of Texas (49). Near the coast of Lake Erie, in Vickery, Ohio, CWM operates an infa- mous.toxic waste storage, disposal, and deepwell injection facility." In 1983, an estimated 40 million gallons of industrial wastes leaked from the well shaft, above the injection wells, at depths prohibited by law. (51) In 1986, an Ohio University professor predicted that continued deep well injection at Vickery "will to a reasonable degree of professional certainty cause an earthquake within the area of the Vickery site." (52) In 1990, a class action lawsuit by local residents against the Vickery injection well was n what is described s as the largest settlementver awarded y settled. lin the 11.S. related to by hazardous Page 16 s21061 19 • waste disposal site, WMI agreed to pay $15,000,000 to property owners and their attorneys. However, under terms of the settlement, local prop- erty owners are forbidden from "objecting to migration tor toxics from the deep well] in any forum," and even their heirs are not allowed to make any legal claims regarding damage from such migration. CWM could not buy every Vickery citizen's silence, however: William Warner, one of the original plaintiffs, rejected the agreement, stating that he refuses to sell his human rights to the company. (53J LANDFILLS "A TALE OF TWO BOOKS" Hazardous Waste Landfills The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency recently reported that "there is good theoretical and empirical evidence that the hazardous constitu- ents that are placed in land disposal facilities very likely will migrate from the facility into the broader environment. This may occur several years, even many decades, after placement of the waste in the facility, but...it will occur eventually." (56) WMPs toxic waste and garbage land- fills are no exception. All landfills leak. There is no such thing as a se- cure landfill. Over the past century, dumping hazardous wastes in landfills has be- come an industrial tradition. Now, hazardous wastes are being exhumed from hundreds of leaking landfills across the U.S. and shipped to newer landfills across the U.S. under the Superfund program. WMI is responsi- ble for many of these sites, both those that are being unburied, and those that are receiving Superfund wastes. Most of CWM's dumps receiving Superfund and other hazardous wastes have begun to show signs of leak- age. Others are already closed, such as CWM's toxic waste dump in Lowry, Colorado. The Lowry landfill has been closed since 1982, when CWM em- ployees tried to hide a major toxic waste leak. According to two employ- ees, Lowry's general manager instructed them to keep two sets of books: one of them a black colored logbook to be shown to inspectors that did not reveal the leak, the other a yellow colored log that did record the leak but was not given to inspectors. (57) CWM currently operates seven hazardous waste landfills in the U.S., including the one at Emelle, Alabama, one of the world's largest. Since 1978, CWM has dumped over five million tons of toxic wastes on what was once lush farmland in remote rural Alabama. In 1989 alone. Emelle received 790,000 tons of wastes from 42 U.S. states and U.S. military bases abroad. (58) 'Deep well injection is not the dirtiest disposal method employed by CWM in Vickery, Ohio. Between 1980 and 1983, CWM illegally dumped PCBs and dioxin -contaminated wastes in open lagoons. Worse, the company mixed PCB wastes with waste oil at Vick- ery, and then sold over six million gallons of the toxic concoction as "heating oil" to unsus- pecting Midwestern oil customers. (54) The U.S. EPA eventually penalized CWM $2.5 million for these violations, but it is estimated that WMI saved over $20 million by selling the PCBs rather than disposing of them. William Sanjour of the U.S, EPA's Office of Solid Waste says that the agency "never really made a strong effort to find out where (the toxic oil) went. By doing so, they saved Waste Management a hell of a lot of money. All of those buyers could have sued." (65) • Page 17 931061 'ao CWM's Emelle dump has experienced on -site fires, off -site water con- tamination, and over two million dollars in penalties for environmental violations. PCBs have been found in wetlands near the dump. (59) In 1989, mounting evidence that the Emelle landfill would soon con- taminate a major aquifer inspired the state of Alabama to try to ban waste imports from states that do not have their own hazardous waste disposal facilities. (Less than 25 percent of the wastes dumped in Emelle are generated in Alabama.) In 1990, Alabama Governor Guy Hunt pro- posed raising the state tax on out-of-state waste imports to $116, to end Alabama's status as "the waste dumping ground of the nation." (60) It is not a coincidence that the Emelle dump site is located in a remote community, many of whose residents —primarily African Americans — live in poverty. Toxic waste is generally dumped on those with the least economic and political power. According to a local official, when the dump's original developers first announced that they were opening a facility in Emelle in 1978, residents were told that "they had found a new use for the Selma chalk...and we thought it was going to be some kind of liming operation. And lo and be- hold, the use they found for the Selma chalk was the holding of chemi- cals." (61) And "lo and behold," the rate of unemployment in surrounding Sumter County rose from 5.6 percent in 1978 to 21 percent in 1986 as clean industry left and plants shut down. (62) It is probably also more than mere coincidence that WIvMI's second larg- est toxic waste dump (and the fifth largest in the U.S.) is located in Ket- tleman Hills, California, a small, remote community of primarily Spanish-speaking farm workers.* In 1988, the Kettleman Hills dump suffered a toxic landslide. As CWM wrote, 'We encountered an unfortunate incident in one section of our...Kettleman Hills facility. For an as yet unknown reason, part of the landfill's liner system pulled away from its anchor on March 19." Accord- ing to CWM, the accident caused "extensive damage" to the landfill's top liner and its leachate collection system. (65) In 1989, the state of California fined CWM $82,500 for eleven viola- tions of environmental regulations, including failure to report a fire and discrepancies on written records for weight and volumes of wastes re- ceived. That brought the total amount of fines, penalties, and settle- ments paid by CWM for its Kettleman Hills operations to over $4,000,000. (66) Similar histories of fines and evidence of groundwater contamination are evident at other WMI/CWM tone waste dumps in Port Arthur, Texas; Carlyss, Louisiana; Arlington, Oregon; Joliet and Calumet City, Illinois; and Furley, Kansas. *Mother alleged form of racial exploitation at a WMI-owned tote waste disposal site: In 1989, four CWM employees and one former employee at the Carlysa, Louisiana, toxic waste dump sued CWM for racial discrimination in hiring and promotion practioee. One worker claims he was harassed by CWM officials, another says that his firing was racially motivated and that co-workers verbally abused him with racial slurs. (64) Page 18 szitowe. "WE ARE A HICK TOWN IN THE MIDDLE OF NOWHERE" Radioactive Waste Landfills GARBAGE DUMPING AND WMI'S SHAM RECYCLING EFFORTS WMI is also capitalizing on the growing and lucrative "low-level" radioac- tive waste disposal market in the U.S. This type of waste includes danger- ous radionuclides generated by commercial nuclear power reactors, industry, and research and medical institutions. Wastes dumped in "low- level" radioactive waste dumps range from radioactive animal carcasses and contaminated clothes to radioactive hardware and pipes, resins, and sludges from nuclear reactors. The largest "low-level" radioactive waste service company in the coun- try, CWM's subsidiary, Chem -Nuclear Systems, Inc. (CNSI), operates one of three licensed commercial "low-level" radioactive waste dumps in the U.S., in Barnwell, South Carolina. Like most of WMI's network of hazard- ous waste landfills, the Barnwell dump is leaking. In 1982, a U.S. Geo- logical Survey report found that radioactive tritium is migrating "downward, outward and upward from the buried waste." The survey re- ports contamination of water beneath the buried waste, including tritium levels 100 times higher than background levels. (67) The Barnwell dump is expected to close before the end of 1992. By then, Chem -Nuclear hopes to open at least four new radioactive waste dumps (in Connecticut, Illinois, North Carolina, and Pennsylvania) un- der the Low Level Radioactive Waste Policy Act, which encourages the construction of regional radioactive waste dumps across the country. Chem -Nuclear also operates a nuclear waste compacting station in Channahon, Illinois. The station began operation in January 1987, with- out WMI informing local residents, including the mayor. "The whole thing that is upsetting to us here is that we are a hick town in the middle of nowhere, and they think they can dump on us," said the town's mayor. The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission agreed that the company may not have adequately informed the Channahon police and fire depart- ments about the presence of low-level radioactive waste. (68) In 1990, an Illinois Senate Executive subcommittee accused WMI and state officials of secretly agreeing to relocate Chem-Nuclear's supercom- pactor to Martinsville, Illinois. The "confidential side agreement" also al- lows Chem -Nuclear to expand planned operations at a proposed regional nuclear dump in Martinsville. CNSI denied the agreement existed before the state acknowledged its existence. The director of the Illinois Depart- ment of Nuclear Safety was fired over the incident. (69) At the beginning of 1990, WMI operated 127 landfills for household gar- bage in North America. The U.S. EPA has warned that household waste landfills "have degraded and continue to degrade the environment: (70) Contamination at almost 200 garbage dumps has been so severe that they have been declared Superfund sites. WMI is a partially responsible party for the Superfund "cleanup" of at least 15 garbage landfills. Because of its track record, WMI's subsidiaries use a variety of lanfill- siting strategies. In some instances, WMI will mask its identity as a subsidiary whose ties to the parent company are not well known. Another strategy is to have an existing local operator develop a new landfill and then hand it over to WMI for a fee. Old landfills are often relatively cheap because they are leaking or otherwise in trouble and no one wants the associated liabilities. WMI promises local officials it will clean i.;; the mess if it receives authority to reopen, or keep open, a troubled landfill. Page 19 931061 dd, • • Under these circumstances, local officials have little choice. If they re- fuse, the WMI subsidiary can seek to develop its own competing landfill, while pressuring government officials to close down the existing dump in order to gain a monopoly on dumps in the area. Gaining control over dis- posal capacity —landfills and incinerators —is key to the company's mo- nopolization strategy. When it comes to privatizing municipal garbage disposal services, some officials worry that there will be no way to control prices on a long- term basis and control what goes into a landfill. Local officials have little say over who dumps waste once a landfill is turned over to private opera- tors. Even though a private waste company like WMI may relieve public officials of short-term political headaches when they monopolize dumps in the area, the responsibility will still return to the community in the form of contributions to a superfund site (for which they may be held li- able as waste generators) or directly to taxpayers, who usually foot the bill for dump cleanups. As always, WMI continues to claim their latest landfill designs are "state-of-the-art," by which they mean they won't leak. It's difficult to prove a dump is leaking while it is in operation; the enforcement system is based on company self -monitoring. (Despite this, WMI has admitted that at least 10 of its dumps have contaminated groundwater.) The com- pany's incentive for making sure its dumps appear to be leakless is based on transferring its liabilities to future generations: once the period of the company's financial responsibility for dumps expires (usually 30 years af- ter :. a dump closes), taxpayers foot the bill for cleanup. WMI plans to open 60 new garbage dumps and many new garbage in- cinerators. These new landfills and incinerators will not just contami- nate our drinking water and air, their availability will discourage real solutions to the garbage crisis: the reduction in the toxicity of garbage, and the implementation of maximum waste recycling, composting, reduc- tion, and reuse programs. U.S. television networks often air advertisements that portray WMI as the country's leading recycler. Yet very little recyclable waste handled by WMI is ever recycled. In 1989, WMI hauled away recyclables for recy- cling from just 16 percent of their household customers. A recent article in Business Week explains the importance of WMI's small but highly visible recycling program: "even though recycling has yet to turn a profit, it's working...to pull in business for WMI's landfill op- erations, which boast a pretax profit margin of 20%." (72) WMI probably erations, which boast a pretax profit margin of 20%." (72) WMI probably not invested more heavily in recycling because it gets people thinking about pollution prevention and waste reduction —direct threats to the company's revenue, which is generated almost entirely from waste dis- 1 posai. - Currently, the U.S. recycles about 13 percent of its solid waste. The EPA has set a national goal of 25 percent reduction in the waste stream through recycling. New Jersey has set a goal of 65 percent. Studies by in -- stitutions such as the Center for Biology of Natural Systems in New York have shown that between 70 and 90 percent of the household waste stream can be eliminated through an intensive recycling, composting, and waste reduction program. WMI officers, such as William Hulligan, president of Waste Management of North America, claim that only 10 to 20 percent of household waste can be reduced through recycling. (73) Even where Recycle America and Recycle First (WMI and Wheelabra- tor's recycling divisions) operate extensive recycling programs, the com- age 20 . S'106:a3 • • pany has not eliminated the use of landfills and incinerators. For exam- ple, in San Jose, California, where it runs a showcase recycling program, WMI continues to heap garbage in a leaking dump in a canyon occupied by an endangered type of butterfly. (74) WMI says they have taken steps to preserve the butterfly; the dumping continues and time will tell. In March 1991, the Arkansas Gazette reported that heavy lobbying by WMI and BFI derailed part of Governor Bill Clinton's package of garbage and recycling bills. The paper quoted Representative Byrum Gibson (sponsor of the bills) saying, "We all know what will happen if those bills don't pass. BFI and Waste Management will be the two czars of the state in five years, and we'll pay whatever garbage fees they want us to pay." (84) Aware of WMI's motivations and history of operations, communities like Oak Park, Illinois, have chosen alternative contractors over WMl for city recycling contracts. The city of Tamarac, Florida, turned down WMI's offer to handle residential recycling "because of uncertainty of the fairness of the proposed pact." WMFs subsidiary, Recycle America, was also blocked in its attempt to take over a Montevallo, Alabama, church - based recycling program. (75) Waste Management's new image as a recycler should not, therefore, be confused with a sincere desire to reduce household waste. Nor should anyone be fooled by CWM's Waste Reduction Consulting Services divi- sion, which does next to nothing to prevent the production of waste by in- dustry. According to one industry analyst, CWM's Waste Reduction Consulting Service "tends in the balance to result in more waste for [CWM] facilities." (85) True "taxies use reduction" does not mean shifting toxic exposures be- tween workers, consumers, and various segments of the environment. True "taxies use reduction" means changing raw materials, products, and production processes to avoid the use of toxic substances. CWM's Waste Reduction division focuses entirely on the reduction of hazardous waste after it has been produced by an industrial plant, For example, it advises companies to divert wastes from a deionizing waste- water treatment process and dump them directly into the sewer, instead of into a treatment plant. (76) CWM also recommends, and engages in, shipping toxic solvent wastes to cement kilns where they are burned as fuel. Federal regulations allow waste generators to reclassify solvent wastes as "recycled" when deliv- ered for blending as a supplemental fuel for cement kilns. This sham "re- cycling" loophole infederal law has transformed the cement manufacturing industry into a major disposal point for toxic wastes. Ce- ment kilns "recycle" (by which they mean burn) three billion pounds of toxic wastes annually. (77) Since 1988, CWM has become a supplier of solvent waste fuel for many cement kilns in the U.S. and for a WMI-owned incinerator in Mex- ico. The company's West Carrollton, Ohio, solvent fuel blending plant re- ceived over 108 million pounds of chlorinated solvent wastes from 26 states in 1989. CWM currently operates fuel blending facilities in New- ark, New Jersey; Azusa, California; Henderson, Colorado; and Tijuana, Mexico. CWM's hazardous waste landfills in Alabama and Chicago also ship solvents to cement kilns. (78) Page 21 921061 �� • THE EMPIRE EXPANDS FIGHT THE POWER THAT POLLUTES WMI is diversifying rapidly into operations such as asbestos removal (Brand Companies) and Superfund site remediation (ENBAC division), whose profitability takes advantage of the historic failure of industry to reduce waste and convert to the use of safe materials and clean technolo- gies. WMI is also going into such industries as the lawn pesticide busi- ness, a business whose entire existence is sustained through the unnecessary and harmful dispersion of chemicals. WMI is also quickly expanding from North America to the rest of the world. Waste Management's International division now accounts for 10 percent of the company's total revenue. Thomas Smith, WMI's manager of Far East business development, has predicted that Asia will replace North America as the biggest WMI customer within 20 years. WMI has entered into a partnership with a ministerial -level investment wing of the government of China in a bid for a chemical waste plant in Hong Kong. (79) This is not the first time WMI's search for profits across the globe have taken precedence over concerns for human safety and human rights. In 1979, during the height of Argentine government -sponsored "disappearances" of thousands of political dissidents, Waste Management took advantage of the country's move to privatize services by entering into a ten-year municipal contract to haul garbage in Buenos Aires. Dean Buntrock, WMI's chief executive officer, commented at the time that the contract with the city "reflects the pro -business policies of the federal government which have created an attractive atmosphere in Ar- gentina. (80) WMI's biggest current expansion is in Europe. An investment firm re- cently reported that WMI "has grown its European business from $35 mil- lion to $500 million annually over the past two years." WM.I expects that its 1990 European revenues will exceed $700 million. By May 1990, WMI held contracts in more than 325 European communities. (81) The company is establishing major operations in Sweden, the Nether- lands, Spain, France, Germany, England, and Italy. WMI operates a haz- ardous waste incinerator in Moerdijk, Netherlands. It is trying to gain control over the French waste management firm, PEC, whose subsidiary, Tredi, operates five incinerators in France. WMI is also believed to be trying to take over Italy's largest waste -hauling company, SASPI, which would give WMI 55 percent of the Italian garbage hauling market. (82) Greenpeace and other environmentalists and community groups around the world are fighting WMI with ever-increasing success as the com- pany's dismal track record —and the fundamentally destructive nature of all its technologies —is revealed. It is our hope that this report will help generate even more success in blocking WMI and other companies' at- tempts to site new disposal facilities. The following is a list of just a few of the places where, since 1988, a combination of knowledge of WMI's troubled history, combined with com- munity pressure, forced WMI to cancel plans to burn, bury, or store haz- ardous wastes and garbage: Page 22, 9210" Douglas County, Colorado Dallas County, Missouri Nobel County, Indiana Rapid City, South Dakota Anchorage, Alaska Stickney, Illinois New York City Pike County, Mississippi Palmer, Massachusetts New Orleans East, Louisiana Calumet City, Illinois Blairsville, Pennsylvania A well-informed, firmly entrenched group can keep WMI's unsafe op- erations out of a community. These groups have proven that WMI is vul- nerable. Grassroots groups across the continent have publicized WMI's sorry history, used civil disobedience, and forced authorities to enact local ordinances to prevent this company from entering their community. Greenpeace, the Citizens' Clearinghouse for Hazardous Wastes, and many well -organized grassroots groups can help you learn how to organ- ize such a group. We hope this report will aid community groups, enforcement officials, and public employees across the world in their decisions about dealing with WMI. THE END? This abstract is incomplete and has no ending —because there is no ap- parent ending to the company's assault on the global environment. At the same time, there is a growing movement for environmental justice around the world, and a growing sense that things can and must change before it's too late. Please send us your information about the company and your success in stopping its efforts to expand, so we can help complete the story. Send information, with complete references (including page numbers) to the ad- dress listed below. The full report, Waste Management, Inc.: An Encyclopedia of Environ- mental Crimes and Other Misdeeds, will provide citizens with dozens of pages of facts, figures, and stories about the world's largest waste hauler. To receive a copy, please send $20.00 to: Information Services, Green - peace USA, 1436 U Street. N.W., Washington, DC 20009 532 ono Page 23 • • OTHER SOURCES NOTES Other excellent sources of information about Waste Management Inc. in- clude: Waste Management Inc.: A Copy -rate Profile, published by the Citizens' Clearing- house for Hazardous Wastes in 1988. This manual is designed to arm citizens with information needed to fight WMI in every community. The report is available from CCHW, P.O. Box 8606, Falls Church, VA; telephone: (703) 237-2249. See also, "There Ought Be a Law," by Brian Lipsett and Will Collette, an article aboutenacting con- tract crimes ordinances in your community, in the June issue of "Everyone's Back- yard." Each issue of "Everyone's Backyard" covers the latest in WMI follies, misdemeanors, and crimes. The newsletter, Rachel's Hazardous Waste News, edited by Peter Montague. Available from: Environment Research Foundation, P.O. Box 73700, Washington, DC 20056-3700. Subscription rate: $40 per year for individuals and citizens groups; $15 for students and seniors. A series of articles about WMI and Browning -Ferris Industries by the Ft. Lauder- dale News/Sun-Sentinel. A news -magazine edition of the series, titled the Titans of Trash, was published by the newspaper in December 1988. For the early history of the waste -hauling industry, including the birth and growth of WMI and BR, see Harold Crooks, Dirty Business: The Inside Story of the New Garbage Agglomerates . Toronto, Canada: James Lorimer & Co., 1983. Contact the Canadian Union of Public Employees, John Calvert, Research Department, 21 Florence St., Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K2P OW6. For more information about WMI's garbage ir.thneration subsidiary, Wheela- brator Technologies, see: Waste Not, a weekly publication of Work on Waste LISA, Inc., 82 Judson, Canton, N.Y. 13617, (315) 3, 9-9200, and Robert Collins, Bad Deals and Broken Promises: A Survey of Wheelabrator's Performance. Washington, DC: Clean Water Funtl, September 1989, Copies are available from Clean Water Fund,132018th St., N.W., Washington, DC 20036, (202) 546-6614. 1. Waste Management Inc., "Company Fact Sheet" Oak Brook, IL: Waste Manage- ment, Inc., 1990. Sulam, Mark. "Waste Services Industry Review." New York, NY: Kidder Peabody Equity Research, June 27, 1999. Vishnu Swamp, "Pollution Control Industry." New York, NY: Prudential-Bache Securities, July 1989, p. 3. 2. Trillin, Calvin. "Uncivil Liberties." The Nation May 28, 1988, p. 738. Associated Press. 'Waste Company Chief Highest Paid Executive in State at $8.5 Million." Mt. Vernon (IL.J Region -News May 15,1989, p,1. 3. Wisconsin v. Acme Disposal Strike Corp., Complaint (Cr, Ct. Wis. Sept. 28, 1962). 4. Bremner, Brian. "Waste Management A Rogue, or a Star?" Crain's Chicago Busi- ness October 12,1987, p.1. Crooks, Harold. Dirty Business: The Inside Story of the New Garbage Agglomerates . Toronto, Canada: James Lorimer & Co., 1983. Schulte, Fred. "Laws Provide Little Deterrent to Price Fixing lin 'Titans of Trash' series)." Ft. Lauder- - •= dale Sun -Sentinel December 7, 1987, p. 1. 5. Culp, Guterson, et al. 'Report on Charges and Claims of Corrupt Practices, Price Fixing, Violations of Environmental Standards at landfills, etc." presented to Seattle City Council, November 16, 1989, p. 38. Available from: Culp, Cuterson, 27th floor, Al 1 Union Square, 600 University St., Seattle, WA 98101-3143; phone (206) 624-7141. Memo entitled "Compliance History report" from Kathryn Jones Cooper, Assistant Attorney General to the North Carolina Joint Select Committee on Low -Level Radio- active Waste .Raleigh, NC: North Carolina Department of Justice, July 21, 1989, p. 4 c i 1 .1 i Page 24 /� Q?t.06 14O1 • • 16. Available front State of North Carolina Department of Justice, P.O. Box 629, Raleigh 27602-0629. See also Schulte, cited above. 6. Schulte, cited above, 7. Culp, Guterson, et al. cited above, pp. 39-40. Richards, Bill. "Two Waste Finns to Pay $700,000 in Ohio Lawsuit," Wall Street Journal August 16, 1988, p. 1. 8. Associated Press. "Garbage Hauler Collects Fine in Price Fixing Case." Pensacola Nees -Journal January 17, 1988, p. 1. Ditzen, Stuart, and Mark Jaffe. "Price-fixing Ac- cusations Follow Waste Management and BFI." Philadelphia Inquirer May 9, 198.8, p. 4. North Carolina Department of Justice, cited above. Pierce, Rick. "Hauler Fined $1 million, Waste Management Inc. Pleads No Contest in U.S. Suit." Ft. Lauderdale Sun - Sentinel January 13, 1988, p. 1. 9. Culp, Guterson, et al., cited above. Donze, Frank "Officials Say Garbage Collec- tor Threatened Lives." New Orleans Times -Picayune October 7, 1988, p. B1. 10. Chen, Edwin.' Waste Hauler Fined $1 million in Price -Fixing Case." Los Angela Times March 14, 1989, Metro Section, p.1 11. "Reiner Sees Pervasive Cartel Conspiracy by Trash Hauling Firms." Los Angeles Times June 10, 1987, p. 6. 12. Associated Press. 'Top Garbage Hauler Fined $1 million." Columbus Dispatch January 17, 1988, p. 1. Ditzen and Jaffe, cited above. 13. Blumenthal, Ralph.' Waste Hauler's Business Acts Faulted." New York Times March 24,1983, p.1. McClure, Robert, and Fred Schulte. "Bribery Investigations Dog Waste Hauler." Ft. Lauderdale Sun -Sentinel December 8, 1987, p.1. 14. U.S. Federal Electoral Committee, as reported in the Universal Almanac,1990, p. 95. 15. Jackson, B. "Interest Groups Pay Millions in Appearance Fees to Get Legislators to Listen as Well as to Speak" Wall Street Journal June 4, 1985, p.1. Common Cause, press release, June 25, 1986. 16. Burke, M. "Waste Corporation Tries Selling Self to Commissioners." Pensacola Journal November 14, 1984, p. 1. McClure, Robert, and Fred Schulte. 'Bribery Inves- tigations." cited above. 17. Associated Press. "Business, Lobby Give Money to Alabama Legislators." Atlanta Constitution September 14,1988, p. All. Brock, Brightman. 'To keep or not to keep is question," Mobile IALI Register December 19, 1985, p. 1. 18. Pierce, Rick, and Fred Schulte. "Haulers Curry Favor in Community." Ft. Lauder- dale Sun -Sentinel December 8, 1987, p. 1. 19. Gaines, W., and D. Baguet. "City Can't Dispose of Waste Firm." Chicago Tribune June 29, 1986, p.1. 20. Brock, cited above. 21. Possley, M. "Guilty Pleas by Bribery Case Figure." Chicago Tribune May 19,1988, p. 1. Possley, M., and R. Davis. "Ex.-Ald. Kelley to Plead Guilty." Chicago Tribune April 24, 1987, p. 1. 22. Crawford, W., Jr. 'Waste Company Official Jailed for Briber/7 Chicago Tribune March 14,1986, p.1. 23. Seigenthaler, K. "Kane County Official Linked to '81 Donation," Chicago Tribune August 25, 1988, Metro Section, p. 1. Page 25 321.46'!! a$ 24. Neal, S. "Toxic Eddie Flies Free on Waste Management Jets." Chicago Sun Times October 19, 1988. Webb, Andrew. "Waste Management Cleans Up." Chicago Maga- zine June 1990, p.122. 25. Peterson, C., and H. Kurtz. "EPA Speeds Friend's Permit," Washington Post Febru- ary 19, 1983, p, 1. Schneider, Keith. 'The Leper Ships: Incinerators Sent to Sea." Oceans Magazine May 1964, p. 65. 26. Lash, Jonathan. A Season of Spoils: The Reagan Administration's Attack on the Envi- ronment. New York, NY: Pantheon Books, 1984. 27. List of WMI environmental grants recipients provided by WMI, 1990, 28. McNeil, J. "Protective Instincts at the EPA, Part 11: Keeping Reilly Covered." In These Times November 22, 1989, p.12. Waste Management Inc. State Initiatives to In- hibit Development of Hazardous Waste Disposal Capacity and to Restrict Interstate Ship- ment of Hazardous Waste (briefing paper prepared for Dean Buntrock's breakfast meeting with William Reilly] Oak Brook, IL: Waste Management, Inc., 1989. Martin, T., and J. Healy. "Ecologists Outraged Over Attack on Program." Winston-Salem Jour- nal April 21, 1989, p. 11. J. Hair, president of the National Wildlife Federation, let- ter to Elizabeth Spence, executive director of South Carolina Wildlife Federation, December 21, 1989. Gold, A. "House Panel Opens Inquiry Into EPA Office." New York Times December 10,1989, p. 5. 29. "Federation Hires Chief, Plans Campaign; New International Law Effort." The Chronicle of Philanthropy July 25,1989, p. 15. Montague, Peter. "EGA Gives WMI the Boot."Rachel's Hazardous Waste News #181 May 16, 1990, p. 2. • 30. Nolan, M. "Church Refuses Donation from Waste Management" The (Chicago! Times December 28, 1986, p. 1. 31. Pierce, Rick, and Fred Schulte. "Haulers Curry Favor in Community." Ft. Lauder- dale Sun -Sentinel December 8, 1987, p. 32. Hanson, David. "Hazardous Waste Management: Planning to Avoid Future Problems." C&EN (Chemical and Engineering News] Vol. 67, No. 31. July 1989, pp. 9- 18. Warren, John L. 'Status of Hazardous Waste Management in the United States: Focus on Incineration." Presented at Incineration of Industrial Wastes: Fourth An- nual National Symposium. Houston, Texas, February 28 - March 2, 1990. 33. Schulte, Fred, and Robert McClure. "Nation's Top Two Garbage Haulers Leave Legacy of Pollution, Soaring Prices." Ft. Lauderdale NewsO5un-Sentinel December 6, 1987, p. 1. 34. CWM Form 10K, filed with the Securities Exchange Commission, 1989, p. 9. 35. Correspondence from Hugh Kaufman of U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, to John Martin, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Inspector General, October 17, 1989. 36. Franklin Research and Development, Boston, MA. "How One Investment Finn Rates 25 Companies on the Environment" Fortune Feb. 12, 1990, p. 27. 37. Ritter, Jim, "S. Side Incinerator Hit With a Second Big Fine." Chicago Sun -Times October 9, 1990, p. 1. 38. Bukro, Casey. "Illinois EPA Wants to Shut Southeast Side incinerator." Chicago Tribune April 22, 1988, Section 2, p. 3. 39. Nelson; D., "Foes Step Up Attack on Incinerator." Chicago Sun Times, October 2, 1989, p. 1. Webb, Andrew.' Waste Management Cleans Up." Chicago Magazine July, 1990, p. 122. 40, Bergsvik, R. "Incinerator to Stay Open." !Calumet City, IL) Daily Calumet June 16, 1989, p.1. "Charge 219 Companies Polluted Local Streams." The News (Chicago, JLJ i Page 26 321061 • • April 26, 1990, p.12. Chicago Metropolitan Water Reclamation District, Summary of FOIA Report, May 24, 1990. D. Nelson, October 2, 1989. 41. Smith, A., and J. Aubuchon, "Waste Company Will Pay Penalty." Be!kville [ILJ News -Democrat February 17, 1990, p. 1. 42. Kemezis, P. "Chemical Waste Outlines Ambitious Expansion Plans." Environment Week February 22, 1990, p. 1. 43. Hutson, J. "How Clean are the Titans of Trash?" New Hampshire Broadcaster July 5, 1989, p. 1. O'Conner, M.' Waste Firm Conquers New Worlds." Chicago Tribune Feb- ruary 7, 1988, p. Cl. Richards, B., and K Rose. "Henley and Waste Management to Merge Trash to Energy Lines into a New Firm." Wall Street Journal April 22, 1988, p. 3. 44. Pierce, R. "City Gets Burned." Ft. Lauderdale Sun -Sentinel December 10,1987, p.1. 45. "Draft Technical Support Document to Proposed Dioxins and Cadmium Control Measure for Medical Waste Incinerators." Prepared by the California Air Resources Board,1990, cited in Rachel's Hazardous Waste News *179 May 2, 1990. 46. 'Waste Management's Growing Medical Services." WMJ Report (WM1 newslet- ter] October, 1989, p. 3. 47. Budd, D. Ohio EPA Division of Solid and Hazardous Waste. Con • pondence to George Hubert, Multi Tech Industries Inc. IWMI's medical services division), April 3, 1989, p. 1. 48. Correspondence between the Tent, Texas, city government, the Texas Depart- ment of Health, the U.S. EPA, the Texas Air Control Board and Waste Management Inc., October 20,1988 to December 22, 1989. 49. Scarlett, H. "Environmental Group Gives Notice About Suit." Houston Post March 2, 1989, p. A21. 50. Ibid. 51. "Ohio EPA Study Says Waste Management Unit's Wells Leaked." Wall Street Jour- nal April 6, 1984. 52. Warner v. Waste Management Inc., C.A. No. S-86.10, Affidavit of Prof. Moid U. Ah- mad, Ph.D. in Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Ohio Ct. App. Oct. 1986), 53. Warner v. Waste Management, Inc., No. 83 -CV -78, Release, Acknowledgement and Agreement (Ohio Corn. Pleas 1990). blunt, J, "Chem Waste settlement OK'd." Fre- mont (Ohio) News -Messenger January 27, 1990, p.1. 54. Cook, J. 'Waste Management Cleans Up." Forbes November 18, 1985, pp. 88-89. Pasztor, A. "WMI is Cited by EPA Over PCBs, Contaminated Heating Oil," Wall Street Journal January 25, 1985. 55. Webb, Andrew.' Waste Management Cleans Up." Chicago Magazine June 1990, p. 122. 56. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. "Solid Waste Disposal Facility Criteria," Federal Register August 30, 1988, p. 33345. 57, Finke, Eric. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, memo entitled "RCRA In- spection Report, EPA Region 8, Waste Management Branch. Denver -Arapahoe Chemical Waste Processing Facility, Aurora, CO, September 16 and 17, 1982." 58. Horan, J., and D. Suchetka. "Company to Oversee Waste Site Plagued by Fines, Lawsuits." Charlotte INCJ Observer March 25,1990, p. 1. Kemezis, cited above. Page 27 93106' • • 59. Associated Press. "Radioactive Metal Dust Buried at Area Landfill." Tuscaloosa (ALI News October 20, 1987. p. 1. Loverude, D. "Lawmaker Wants Radioactive Waste Removed from State." and 'Credibility Problem." Montgomery (ALI Advertiser October 22, '1987, p. Cl. 60. Kemezis, cited above. 61. Brock, B. "Dioxin Find to Instigate Emetic Probes." Mobile (ALI Register December 15, 1984. 62. Greene, J. 'The Poisoning (of Emelle, Alabama]." Southern Magazine February, 1988, p. 26. 63. Clemings, R. 'New Contamination Discovered: Tests at Kettleman Hills Site Un- earth Cyanide in Ground Water.' Fresno Sec March 27, 1986, p.1. 64. Haupt, Shirley. 'Workers Sue; Claim Racial Bias at CWMI." Southwest Daily News February 12, 1989, p.1. 65. Letter from Steven Drew, CWM Regional Community Relations Manager, to "Environmental and Public Interest Group Leaders," April 5, 1988, p. 1. Clemings, R. "Kettleman Landfill Unit Shut Down.' Fresno Bee March 24, 1988, p. B1. 66. Nielsen, It "ChemWaste Deluged with Questions" Hanford (WA) Sentinel June 30, 1988, p. 1. 67. Smith, Brenda H. "U.S. Government Studies Contradict Spiker's Beliefs." Solomon Valley Post March 19, 1987, p.1. 68. Bukro, Casey. "Nuclear Waste Plant Moves in Without Whisper; Town Hollers." Chicago Tribune January 26, 1987, p. 1. Bukro, Casey. 'Nuclear Safety Unit Hit on Compactor." Chicago Tribune January 29, 1987, p. 1. "Q.J51 Sued for Planned Waste Compactor." Nuclear News April, 1987, pp. 57-58. 69. Nicodemus, C. "Secret Nuke Plan Bared." Chicago Sun -Times March 18, 1990, p. 1. 70. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Solid Waste Report to Congress, cited above. 72. Bremner, B. 'Recycling: the Newest Wrinkle in Waste Management's Bag." Busi- ness Week March 5, 1990, pp. 48-49. 73, Commoner, Barry. Making Peace With the Planet. New York, NY: Pantheon Books, 1990. Correspondence from Hans Mueller, Surveillance and Enforcement Branch, Division of Solid Waste Management, Texas Department of Health, to Kevin Yard, NINA, Inc., December 22, 1989. Waste Management, Inc. 1987 Annual Report to Stockholders. Oak Brook, IL: Waste Management, Inc.,1987, p.11. 74. Rodebaugh, D. "Landfill Leak Expected by Opponents." San Jose Mercury News March 10, 1989, p. 1B. Rodebaugh, D. "Landfill Toxics Ooze Toward Water." San Jose Mercury News March 9, 1989, p. 1B. Witt, B. "Little Competition Foreseen in Trash Service." San Jose Mercury News January 6, 1988, p. 1. 75. Jensen, T. 'Tamarac Recycling Program Talks Stalled." Ft. Lauderdale Sun -Sentinel February 15, 1989, p. 3. 76. Chemical Waste Management Waste Reduction Services. Oak Brook, IL: Chemical Waste Management, Inc., 1989, p. 5. 77. For more information on the use of hazardous waste in cement and aggregate kilns, see Costner, Pat, and Joe Thornton. Sham Rasters, Part I: Hazardous Wastes In- cineration in Cement and Aggregate Kilns. Washington, DC: Greenpeace U.S.A., 1990. 78. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency. "1988 Facility Annual CAPs Report: CWM Recovery, Inc." An undated computer printout provided to the author by Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, June 1990. 1 Page 28 _!31.061 31 79. Aderman, G. "US. Waste Specialist Opens Asian Office." Journal of Commnce February 7, 1990, Brown, Alex, and Sons." 'Waste Management Inc.— Company Re- port." April 1, 1990. Waste Management Inc., WMI Report [WMI newsletter] June 1990. 80. Crooks, H. cited above. 81. Investext, May 14, 1990. "U.S. Waste Major Targets European Acquisition." Euro- pean Chemical News Vol. 52, February 13,1989, p.1. 82. Hamilton, M. 'Turning Trash Into Cash," The Washington Post July 8, 1990, p. HI. 83. Bergsvick, Robert "Explosion Closes Incinerator." Southtown Economist Feb. 14, 1991, p. A3. Correspondence from Mary A. Cade, Director, Illinois Environmental Protection Agency [Springfield, IL), to Kurt Frey, General Manager, Chicago Incin- erator (also known as "the SCA Incinerator"), CWM Chemical Services, Inc., dated Feb. 21,1991. 84. Decker, Caroline. 'Three Garbage Bills Dumped." (Little Rock) Arkansas Gazette March 14, 1991, special section, p. 3. 85. Investext, Waste Management - Company Report (Published by the NewsNet online computer database service, dated September 8, 1990). 86, Pierce, Rick, and Fred Schulte. "Inflated Prices Help Profits Pile Up." Ft. Lauder- dale (FL( Sun Sentinel December 7, 1987, p. 1. 87. Possley, M. "Ex -Lobbyist Pleads Guilty to Fraud." Chicago Tribune Feb. 5,1987, p.1. • 93s p, 7-kik f,-.Ollt& Attorneys At Law 1775 Sherman Street • Suite 1300 Denver, Colorado 80203 (303) 861-1963 • Fax: (303) 832-4465 Ext. 123 February 26, 1993 Ms. Connie Harbert, Chairperson Weld County Commissioners 915 - 10th St., P.O. Box 758 Greeley, Colorado 80632 ^, •7 • • ',r, ..,_... VIA FAX: 1-352-0242 RE: Request for Rescheduling of March 24, 1993 Hearing Dear Chairperson Harbert: I have just learned that a public hearing has been set for March 24, 1993 on the Central Weld County Sanitary Landfill matter. The Ashton -Daniels Neighborhood Association has a vital interest in this matter and requested a hearing. Nevertheless, we were not contacted regarding the hearing date. I will be out of the United States traveling in Bolivia from Match 20- 29, 1993, this being the spring break for my wife who is a teacher. The cost of the airline tickets was $2,000.00, and we purchased them in early January. ;Y FA -k_ z/210 et: R ;OA ; lAier lylltAptvi 931061 / Ms. Connie Harbert February 26, 1993 Page Two In view of the circumstances, in order to allow the Ashton -Daniels Neighborhood Association to prepare for and participate in the hearing, we request that the hearing be rescheduled for an appropriate date in April. My secretary, Dec Trees, has my calendar and can coordinate the date with your staff and that of the County Attorney and the Landfill representatives. Sincerely, 6r� Greg J. Ho s, Jr. for HOBBS, TROUT & RALEY, P.C. GJH/det c: • Weld County Commissioners • Mr. Tom David • Mr. Sam Telep • Mr. Lee Morrison • Mr. Chuck Cunliffe • Mr. John Pickle • Ashton -Daniels Neighborhood Citizens K 331061 04 Al Ili f U .J g.s a oi�.9 gi 2132 S. .. Iltlg 'SUgig.1bs1g At! iftl f a lil,JII a%aTl 41 z bps pUil .2-grg Al. .g405340.4 1.9.11 m- `S 10 a z ao ,. ga3r g� Q g 22b hvggg rt ill g rigid; a� ..a$Sirt-ge a 8;4.06' = fillI'II 80 If! 1111 111 14gi1 142 Milillibiliggilatiff 11 4, 48,48§;.g.,ig ; . 04 1 . -Ergos imid..i_ ®:�. il io. 55p4. i Iglaglijil ia81/4 zvEr 51 � p. Iot 1 N �� lob �Gi.p f--„adnrigslo.ggeR lip �.fel1�_ i l b $ rl Mgt cthi. x� 05,;.. f 1 . t f8 , i ! 5O Y. . KWI dfqjR 111 g ill PH1;11 11111 iR,FRI WV= 1160:-8 A. i ff 6 g Q� ^hdHIR kith tl . • Officials cite Weld landfill for toxins �11laste Management denies violating contamination laws t BY PATRICK ARMIJO • 4mwu ataltwrtar' .The Central Weld Landfill has until Feb. 18 to correct six vi - Chalons of WeidCountyand state health standards or face bear- ings that could revoke its permit for operation. • But WasteManagementint. the landfill's operator, says the landfill Ls not in violation of any of the standards cited by the county. ' • Health officials allege:that toxins called volatile organic compounds= contaminating groundwater at the site, which is nottbeastofMl1likert:Also, a milky -white waste water is leach- ' ing from the landfill onto nearby property, the officials charge. The problems probably existed before. Waste Management took ova the I ndflll, officials said. The contamination of groundwater by the toxins has vlolat- ed'sevetal county health regulations and several Colorado laws, according to memorandumTrom the Weld County Health De- partment to Chock Ctinlife, director of Weld County Planning and Zoning. • Tic intention of the landfill's operators, Waste Management .Ine.,.to operate the landfill fa another decade and to raise the level of the landfill by 30 fat in places also violates the condi- lions on which the landfill was originally permitted in 1971, ac- ` cording to the memorandum. "We don't believe we're in violation, and we are preparing out response right now," said Bill Hedberg, division vice pres- ident of landfill operations for Waste Services Corp.. a sub- sidiary of Waste Management . "We continue to meet regularly with the county over the life of the site. Any concerns in the area are things we found in the • first place. In the last six to eight months, we have been pro-• gressing and we have been proactive to cure anything that needs attending to," Hedberg said. • The volatile organic compounds contaminating groundwater • were discovered through self -testing by Waste Management. Waste Management has another landfill in Weldthe North Weld Sanitary Landfill, five miles west of Ault off Colo. I& John Pickle, director of Weld environmental protection ser- vices, says there have never been any problems at the North Weld landfall. . The problems at Central Weld probably were caused before WasteManag'ement took over operadon of the landfill in 1992, tt: a000rdingtoPickl• • '. "fbem'a atoblan withleaking in older i�tilis--ones in- stalled in the.'70s and the.'60s. We think,we'll see more prob- lems in landfills," Pickle said ' t''•`a'Nowad'aya, lye are much more strict about what is allowed in`landfills. Some• older landfills,werd•not managed as tree- 'tively`ai they are now. The substances that are causing prob. dens at.Centrtil Weld are no, longer accepted. They probably never v+ero'accepted. They just weren't policed as well as they Landfill lament To The Tribtma Unfortunately, it requires a lot of gumption to speak out in our county against the status quo. Granted, there have been a few bold souls out there speaking for many of us too dmld to say anything or to even think of the problems at hand. One who did speak out Dec. 29 was Ann Hayes on the Central Weld (Milliken) Landfill. She gives us a wake up call to envi- ronmental disaster in Weld County. Evident- ly, the county chooses to look the other way while being wooed by big industry — the same ones who make huge profits, leave the air, land, and/or job market in a blighted state, eventually leaving the county with a woeful • calamity. It appear as thought the eountyJs selling its soul fora slice of big business lever- age; but unfortunately, the only businesses we attract now are the polluting and/or cheap labor industries. Why do we accept Waste Management when it has a long record of con- troversial business practices across the coun- try; or the National Hog Farm, after several western states refused to let them operate; or the waste incinerator btlouthem Weld; or the bring collection pools and the injection wells? • What happens when toxic pollutants start showing up as known causes of cancer and birth defects in Weld County residents? Who pays the lawsuit costs and clean-up costs? How can an unlined landtll not cause toxic and hazardous run -Mt when petroleum conta- minated soil, alleged radioactive material and pesticides, asbestos, sludge and other toxins are dumped into 5 to 25 feet of standing water, draining into now -dead lakes. into an irriga- tion ditch and thence to the Big Thompson River, a source of irrigation water for the City of Evans? Would you eat produce or animals watered by this runoff? . Sharon Davis Greeley .9'1064 4e ) Yiv•� t-33 :• 31:03.3 84)9 Isit� C "�vX>� r 'JC'F yob C ..r 4 C C C u .n LiuC C7� A ries� o_ .CN"4 o°u m- ;m gOpNU O N C O Y ° Q ll 2idUO O p u — u c — ,. yy uvc Eo e.12s i A c...:'F.ocs-- ° 33 3 0ha E 0�nb,vYE'vv•ccc, �'?1x _I S fl .E :... G NRu �o 44241 C.. CD 1e EoLp.s��ppag3 gmcgl;' , ago aims Op",c �= zs2) 5° "a-5 OII.9q�q�0.u1Oi ° ^al Gvep�.... uY2- .L -Y 3 Up J,u _I Ep Lac ... .. v8}1.c°.. Uv - aEcoo mos /0�O 0........0,.-.._ S Uz C_ 24 ),...2)-2; s WIMPIPg a gi u• �D ro� E °o- I 8 .E-desp E u 4.342iStgl.“-pcsERS -3...52 il- 5 >, CC 5 o A' o C°v VJ is CU6�°�4 o > Is. Q-IC'M i� o' Y �q}95QQ yy$5 �i l pj '� .`� iE m J5 y.� ep gv��c CA (�)11 $3 eoIOE�,�6$.3an r 4 0. T4 -4.g a° °g tG u i N rota > °�8 ;a- 2 r a"•x C. En u u C I�g 3 Y•.�-� ,"eo. ^T39sM E' n --691-4- r9:= to- k.2 qTu T M a a�yjj u Psi .g a avEE m.�f C > g' -q " rjr:los $r c m E°..3g1SC oc`o�aa 9.� 1 i• 1 i-r C) czt (71 :64.0 • "Er J 53106.1. • • February 17, 1993 Dr. Patricia A. Nolan Executive Director Colorado Department of Health 4300 Cherry Creek South Denver, CO 80222 Dear Dr. Nolan, Regarding: Central Weld Landfill Thank you for your recent letter. We feel you are our one thread of hope with Colorado Department of Health. We appreciate that! The so-called fact sheet put out by Mr. David Shelton has been disturbing, and Mr. Mallary's letters to my husband and myself have been discouraging, but today something came up that cannot be ignored . . . we were trying to do that! Earlier Mr. Glen Mallary invited my husband and I to view the files (this was in November). There was a letter in the file from Ronald L. Forlina, Colorado Department of Health, to Alan Sheere, Waste Management Incorporated. Mr. Sheere was told of the deficiencies of a Special Waste Plan and was told to correct the same and re -submit the plan. The "plan" itself was missing from the file. We eventually, through the County Health Department, viewed this "plan." It was "scary" . . . they were proposing to dump medical waste, banned products, asbestos, contaminated dirt, etc. etc. Again in January, Mr. Glenn Mallary invited us to "view" the Colorado Department of Health files. we did. This time, not only was the Special Waste Plan missing from the file, but also Mr. Forlina's letter, referred to earlier. Today, I found out from Mr. John Pickle that Colorado Department of Health approved this Special Waste Plan but can't even let the County Health Department have a copy because trade secrets of the giants (Waste Management Incorporated) have to be protected! Colorado Department of Health never approved this dump. The county cave a Certificate of Designation. We the citizens of Weld County and dwellers by the Sig Thompson geed to b@ protected, not Waste, naaeme t Tn�nrnnratci, If odor, flies and blowing trash are considered a public nuisance, what of gigantic trucks rolling by with contaminated dirt, semi -trailers and just ordinary trash trucks rolling by? We don't know what is in them. I can't sleep once the trucks start in the morning. It physically hurts to think of what may 521061 5 • • 2 eventually leach out of Central Weld Landfill and go down the Big Thompson and on into the South Platte. Are we no longer to believe that Colorado Department of Health is to protect the health and the environment of .JJ. Colorado residents? weld County has been #1 in agriculture in Colorado and #2 in the nation, according to your own Mr. Stodttird. We are fast becoming #1 in pollution. We have no quarrel with Waste Management's "rights" providing they are operating in a lined, dry facility. It is beyond comprehension that their "trade secrets" have any bearing on this drenched, soggy dump, nestled in an irrigation system, one-fourth mile from the Big Thompson. Please help. Thanking you in advance, Madeline Daniels 23732 WCR 274 Milliken, CO 80543 339-0629 or 537-2265 Copies: Governor Romer Senator Hank Brown Senator Ben Knighthorse Campbell Congressman Wayne Allard Senator Tom Norton Mr. Dave Owen Environmental Defense Fund Environmental Protection Agency Weld County Health Department Weld County Planning Weld County/Board of County Commissioners Attorney General's Office '.s J 92106"! 47 ANtl QO rct O� ta:14 ihe CZ 33106.1. • d ;pates_G� G_ c_Dror.. 5u.)Cb-,._`L, t- an pr- • l�l Ca ---A — lOJ ..-rC rJ r^n VOU . ..n tin.19 r .lt.-✓� L.�_4--1 .e t; Exh;bi+z " p L ( c 4; Guam,p1,t. 9Z1061 , r aINlel3 -bar lel:A-trr- I cto cZ b5�or�.�c , a..-4 xr is ` urt ccti t.� `343t1 b a ck L,a,.-d ; sv "11•1 0-4312-1- t&2., .N '-tn .s c/b en. -0 h,. Ttirr r s . h+owet.e. Z, t,& t �'t d vJ • oSl_ t6..,,Cc(tv+.. ^4-..-, baubon a-Ci p -t0.1;,..5 .'Y, `iE,.C rAA"' .4 L:du_ xdr c.om J �n 'Ifni:,. Lys yct . W -FM kir /J -c i.. cu a-r:.u_ 't .. !� d vd.>�w c..,t t 1, -r . i 'kit, wetz. u. `1✓ Or tL Sy—ash/a, d.LY e L, , wix.iP A w,•ww h_urn tt.c t• -:111-t. —PA c m p s•c-7\ r W Ott r L� to 6r, it (>•41 t&4 GC:tell e h 'MA:104.4-d 4' - tl,.;, e...0 -K.4 ..( t dt ekt_ wec7-.k kt0n 'Ku. Lcw,t•cc U rw k.- "ht....C.k-Lt••.n, • - 'ftF.,.t_ 1' t r,r tcJ Le, --,c A --t€ h , &.+d h k 5 rua f CZs-•-ark -i::,,� O1 tn., 4 true -.,I pro eat -4-41 . Lthece 'c 1e. pq 4n.-;• cars k.r,Ea tint U-, 1it.. 4..a"tw • 'Nu tcc...4 •-tom &C b a. ti_ tr. d t,i-i.xL. 44 t -caf rrc,n d , w e-C....�C.. r°u..•,d, .-a't-. dab ..gar trr pa ac et -4•;•--4b Da ty-trui oa s .t , a -rd pE a rte.. sowd cats -tit, "d4.4. t�V tu„ci t''ftt,... w4Jic 'manta `A&4- is -e t.., t.41. - ("1.-c3, =Fe raarc Q -ho e e ».. t .ti, Lew, p_2t,a , w wet tfv_ w -e -P aZ nw , trr 44 Cie o... S4 t ze 4t-tr.-r pi.42-2t e. 't a 0.A...4a. bs-L•21 1Ct.A. tr'- n.-. tit° , b 4144 act ,t&.. t.1 -6-t . u.Lu be SfC-Ere f<' ? to c U -t-L t a.r d t c•LL tub Oat t et- , "A•c•-<A4- toga -k, Sftt.,.. &.ic!'tu.ttCrr.a.r.1 roe -Le -Li , pntriLl yr saSci t L. Cr o2t.tid t.. CGt•,, 5w entrkZaLrNcd-c-M ? Lo 't t cni fret p L4-cQ • Caw- prt Nr~aO eur ry wlwt¢. , .. (rm. q -tltr. Ara furt...M tat, i, Yinat e�t't�� soi Ile krsp Y -e4,4 ; r, pt,,.t.e. • FSpe oral GJ .n tt�d G� . Kty t r 'gat waZ c. p u u. rn n e e341.-.2. &.at' CC+.f % if, 6 coo, - a'asfvaz� c�eu rtr.thuz� j,1c¢, '-.o/:t .10..at, lice on J'/' 5r ..y tack ye.e-d ,cr et ore✓ ru_ke c'L DcLs.zn. a'r r c(•QJtafercor.w nL*crX.u, titan rP s par s t CSR. wt LP' (' trLck c r, vim. o nnt).-t+aL at. d-. Or&r'ti a o ta•F-t.nAs -tU tiai &,,. t a tar 4 frifitt, • I 921061 931061 7-kikilrolltA • PC Attorneys At Law 1775 Sherman Street • Suite 1300 Denver, Colorado 80203 (303) 861-1963 • Fax; (303) 832-4465 Ert. 123 February 15, 1993 Ms, Connie Harbert, Chairperson Weld County Commissioners 915 - 10th Street, P.O. Box 758 Greeley, Colorado 80632 Mr. Chuck Cunliffe Director, AICP Department of Planning Services Weld County Administrative Offices 1400 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 ij Mr. David Shelton, Director Hazardous Materials and Waste Management Division Colorado Department of Health 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South Denver, Colorado 80222-1530 Mr. Tom David, County Attorney Weld County 915 - 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80632 RE: Violation Notice ZCH-96 of January ls, 1993, and Certified Letter to Waste Services Corporation Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, Dated January 14, 1993 Dear Ms. Harbert, Mr. Cunliffe, and Mr. Shelton: The Ashton -Daniels Neighborhood Association and Sam and Myrtle Telep sent the enclosed letter and attachments on January 18, 1993 to the Weld County Commissioners for the purpose of ensuring that the violations occurring at the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill arc remedied in accordance with the law and the representations made to the Weld County Commissioners when the land use approval and Certificate of Designation for the landfill were obtained from Weld County. We enclosed a transcript which shows that the landfill authorization was obtained on the basis that the facility would not contaminate groundwater, would be in existence for fifteen years, and would he graded so that the natural ground level was maintained upon closure. RX Hi bi# /4 WRSE MGM S7,1.A6' • • Connie Harbert, Chuck Cunliffe and David Shelton February 16, 1993 Page Two The conditions for approval of the landfill have been violated, and no operations plan can be approved which allows the natural surface of the ground to be exceeded in light of the representations made when the land use approval was given. To the extent that the Colorado Health Department and/or Weld County is considering an operations plan for the facility, it must include a condition restricting and prohibiting exceedence of the natural grade of the ground. However, our position is that no operations plan, and definitely no expansion of the facility, should be allowed. We believe that legal and technical review will demonstrate that the only appropriate plan and order for this facility consists of a closure and remedial plan to intercept and treat contaminated groundwater and surface water, and restore the natural grade. Sincerely, -1 Gregory J. Hobbs, Jr. for HOBBS, TROUT & RALEY GJH/det • Glenn Mallory • John Pickle • Lee Morrison GJ11/de112169311 WUDc. COLORADO January 18, 1993 Waste Services, Inc. C/0 Waste Management P.O. Box 122283 Ft. Worth, Tx. 76121 Subject: Dear Sirs: • • DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303) 353.3845, EXT. 3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 1400 N. 17TH AVENUE GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 Violation Notice - ZCH-96 on a parcel of land described as part of the W2 SW4 and the SE4 SW4 of Section 32, T5N, R66W of the 6th P.Y., Weld County, Colorado. A review of your property was conducted to determine if the Conditions of Approval placed on the property at the time SUP -116 was approved by the Board of County Commissioners are in compliance. The review revealed violations of Condition of Approval #1 . John Pickle's memorandum dated January 8, 1993, and Trevor Jiricek's certified letter Number P423 630 398 dated January 14, 1993, outlines the violations of Condition of Approval #1 on the Board of County Commissioners' Resolution dated October 6, 1971. The Department of Planning Services is still evaluating the possibility of violations of Condition of Approval #2 on the Board of County Commissioners' Resolution dated occober 6, 1971. You will be notified if violations are identified during the Department's evaluation. Copies of John Pickle's memorandum dated January 8, 1993, Trevor Jiricek's certified letter dated January 14, 1993, and the Board of County Commissioners' Resolution dated October 6, 1971 are enclosed for your review. The Use by Special Review area must be brought into compliance with the Conditions of Approval within 30 days from the date of this latter. Noncompliance will result in our office scheduling a Probable Cause Hearing before the Board of County Commissioners. If the Board determines there is sufficient probable cause to warrant further action, a Show Cause Hearing will be scheduled to consider revocation of the Use by Special Review permit 116. If you have information that may clear up this matter, please call or write. Sincerely, n V1\ Chuck Cunliffe, AICP Director enclosures pc: William J. Hedberg Bill Jeffry �e Morrison, Assistant County Attorney hn Pickle, Weld County Health Department • • fit V44 iat Wine COLORADO ik JAN 1 4 19931 Certified Letter vo..: P 423 630 398 William J. Hedberg Waste Services Corporation 6037 77th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 Dear Mr. Hedberg: January 14, 1993 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 1517.16 AVENUE CCUR7 GREEDY. COLORACO 80631 AOMINIS7RATION (3031 353-0586 HEALTH PROTECTION (3031353-,635 COMMUNITY HEALTH (303) 353-0639 On December 20, 1992, a representative of the Environmental Protection Division of the Weld County Health Department inspected the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, located at 6O37 77th Avenue. Greeley. in Weld County, Colorado. The purpose of the inspection was to inspect and assess the facilities compliance with the "Regulations Pertaining to Solid Waste Disposal Sites and Facilities" (The Regulations) as promulgated by the Solid Waste Disposal Sites and Facilities Act (The Act). Title 30, Article 20, Part 1, C.R.S., as amended - On the date of the December 20, 1992. field inspection, the following was observed, or has been observed previously: 1. This facility continues to discharge pollutants into state waters without an approved discharge permit. 2. This facility continues to allow water to pond on the eastern portion of the facility. 3. This facility continues to operate in the absence of an approved Design and Operations plan. 4. This facility has contaminated the groundwater beyond the facility property line. S. Solid waste has been placed into groundwater at this site. 6. This facility is currently operating without an emissions permit. It has been documented that previously disposed solid waste is currently exposed to groundwater and that groundwater pollution has occurred at this location. As you are aware. subsection 2.1.4 of The Regulations states that "A site and facility operated as a sanitary landfill shall provide means of finally disposing of solid wastes on land in a manner to minimize nuisance conditions...." and that 821.061 • • William J. Hedberg Certified Letter No.: P 423 630 398 January 14. 1993 Page 2 "nuisance condition are those which may result from explosive gas, bird Lazards, disease vectors, odors, windblown solid wastes or cover materials, open burning, water pollution...." This facility allows water to pond on the eastern portion of the site. According to subsection 2.1.4 this facility "shall provide adequate cover with suitable material and surface drainage designated to prevent ponding of water...." and subsection 2.2.2 which states "Surface waters shall be diverted from, or around. the disposal site and facility and its working face." The Central weld Sanitary Landfill is currently operating without an emissions permit as required by the Air Pollution Control Commission of the Colorado Department of Health. In addition, this facility continues to discharge pollutants into state waters without an approved discharge permit. Operating without a discharge permit is a noncompliant activity according to Title 25, Article 8, Part 5, Colorado Revised Statutes, as amended. Both deficiencies are in violation of Subsection 2.1.2. of The Regulations which states in part "facilities shall comply with the health laws , standards, rules, and regulations of the department, the Water Quality Control Commission, the Air Quality Control Commission...." The operation of this facility in the absence of an approved Design. and Operations Plan is a violation of 30-20-103 of The Act, as it states in part. "Such application shall....set forth the location of the site and facility; the type of site and facility; the type of processing to be used. such as sanitary landfill, composting, or incineration; the hours of operation; the method of supervision; the rates to be charged, if any; and such other information as may be required by the board of county commissioners. The application shall also contain such engineering, geological. hydrological, and operational data...." The Division has taken into consideration that a preliminary Design and Operations Plan, a remedial action plan, and a discharge permit have either been applied for or submitted, which address some of the above issues. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 353-0635. Sincerely, C t if?L t - Trevor Jiricek Solid and Hazardous Waste Specialist TJ-085 cc: Roger Doak, Colorado Department of Health Lee Morrison. Assistant Weld County Attorney Chuck Cunliffe. Weld County Planning Department Alan Scheere, Waste Management of North America. Bill Webster, Weld County Commissioner Inc. 321061 5 • • fat lot mEmoRAf Dum COLORADO To From Subject Chuck Cunliffe, Planning John Pickle, Heal* Central Weld Sanitary Landfill January 8. 1993 The Central Weld facility has been the subject of very close monitoring over the past six (6) months. Disclosure of offsite groundwater contamination by Waste Management in August 1992, along with growing community concern, prompted increased surveillance since July. 1992, and it continues to the present. During this time period, Environmental Protection staff have spent considerable time in field inspections of the site, meetings and correspondence with Waste Management, Waste Services. Colorado Department of Health, and other county offices, as well as review of reports and records from the facility. In the process of these activities we have determined the following areas of concern, which our Division submits as violations_ 1. The operators of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill did not file a Design and Operations plan, although a partial submission was made at the County's request on November 12. 1992. Additional information is still being submitted as it is developed by Waste Services. This failure to file would be a violation of C.R.S. 30-20-103 and Subsection 3.1.2 of the Solid Waste Regulations. There is some question as to whether or not this was a requirement at the time this facility was permitted. Such a report was required in the 1971 Amendments to the Solid Waste Act prior to the hearing by the Board of County Commissioners, but the Act requires such a report only "as may be required by the (State Health) Department by regulation." The State appears to have decided that no report was necessary as they treated the landfill as a grandfathered site. Regardless of the State's position, it appears that the Board of County Commissioners expected such a review and that one never occurred. A review of the files does not show that there ever has been an "approval" by the State Health Department, though there has been some correspondence in recent months. The only correspondence that could be construed as any kind of approval, was that of Dennis Hotovec, approving a change of operator, so long as the landfill continued to be operated in accordance with an operations plan, which apparently, has never existed. 2. The Central Weld Sanitary Landfill has operated without required Discharge Permits. This is a violation of Subsection 2.1.2. of the Solid Waste Regulations, and 25-8-501, Colorado Revised Statutes. 3. The Central Weld Sanitary Landfill contaminated the ground water. This is a violation of Subsection 2.1.4. of the Solid Waste Regulations. The facility has been notified of this violation by our Division on October 5, 1992, and also by the Colorado Department of Health on December 23, 1992. 3.21.06 • • Chuck Cunlif£e. Planning Department Re: Central Weld Sanitary Landfill January 8, 1993 Page 2 4. The Central Weld Sanitary Landfill has allowed ponding of water onsite. This is a violation of Subsection 2.1.4., and 2.2.2. of the Solid Waste Regulations. 5. The Central Weld Sanitary Landfill has placed solid waste into the groundwater on this site. This is a violation of Subsections 2.1.4 of the Solid Waste Regulations, and will be a violation of Subsection 3.1.10 of the revised Solid Waste Regulations. These regulations are scheduled to become effective in April, 1993. 6. In the absence of any design and operations plan, the only basis for establishment of the parameters for the 1971 permits, are the representations of the applicant at the time the permits were considered by the Board of County Commissioners. Those representations did not contemplate a regional landfill with a life of thirty-five (35) years, but rather one with an expected life of less than twenty (20) years. The representations did not contemplate placing fill above the existing grade as Waste Services currently plans. (Reference Design and Operations Plan, Sheet 0,7) The Colorado Department of Health has determined that violations outlined in #4 and #6 above constitute a public nuisance. Environmental Protection Services Division concurs with this determination. Consequently, we would request that these violations at the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill, be brought to the attention of the Board of County Commissioners, in the form of a public hearing for probable cause. Should you need any additional information, please contact me. /]p-011 xc: Randolph L. Gordon, M.D., M.P.H., Director, Weld County Health Department Lee Morrison, Weld County Assistant Attorney +S31.O 7—zolisser & Attorneys At Law 1775 Sherman Street • Suite 1300 Denver, Colorado 80203 (303) 861-1963 • Fax: (303) 832-4465 Ext. 123 January 18, 1993 Ms. Connie Harbert, Chairperson Weld County Commissioners 915 - 10th St., P.O. Box 758 Greeley, Colorado 80632 RE: Request For Hearing For Revocation of Certificate of Designation for Central Weld Sanitary Landfill Dear Chairperson Harbert: The Ashton -Daniels Neighborhood Association ("Neighborhood Association") and Sam and Myrtle Telep request the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County ("Board") to institute a Certificate of Designation Revocation proceeding with regard to the Central Weld County Landfill, under the provisions of C.R.S. 30-20-112, and, upon notice and public hearing, revoke the Certificate of Designation for the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill and require closure and remedial action measures which return the site to its original grade and prevent releases of contaminants into the environment, including groundwater and surface water. The Ashton -Daniels Neighborhood Association includes citizens of Weld County who own property in the vicinity of the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill. Sam and Myrtle Telep own land which adjoins the Landfill. Members of the Telep family reside on the property. Operation of the Landfill has interfered with the use and enjoyment of the property of members of the Neighborhood Association, including Sam and Myrtle Telep. The land use approval for the Landfill was obtained as the result of representations made by the applicant, the Weld County Health Department, and the Department of Health at a hearing before the Board on September 22, 1971. These representations govern the land use approval for the site and apply to the original applicant and all subsequent owners and operators. 321O6 • • Ms. Connie Harbert January 18, 1993 Page 2 Based on information and belief, the owners and operators of the Central Weld County Landfill include Waste Management of North America, Inc., Waste Services, Inc., Mr. Brad Keirnes, and the Keirnes family. A transcript of the tape recorded hearing of September 22, 1971, is attached hereto. The Neighborhood Association also requests the Board to commence a civil action to enjoin operation of the Central weld County Landfill as a public nuisance and to require corrective action to abate the nuisance by restoring the land to its original grade and remediate releases of contaminants into the environment, including groundwater and surface water. The Neighborhood Association requests the Board to base its Certificate of Designation and Nuisance Abatement action on grounds which include the following: 1. The Central Weld County Landfill has been operated without an approved design and operations plan in violation of C.R.S. 30-20-103 and Subsection 3.1.2 of the Solid Waste Regulations of the Colorado Department of Health. At the Board's public hearing, it was represented to the Board that rules and regulations would be promulgated by the Colorado Department of Health governing engineering design and operation of the Landfill. (Hearing of September 22, 1971, at Page 5.) All materials disposed of at this facility in the absence of an approved design and operations plan were illegally disposed of and should be ordered to be removed. 2. Solid waste has been disposed of in groundwater, con- trary to Subsection 2.1.4 of the Solid Waste Regulations and contrary to representations made on September 22, 1971, during the Board's public hearing by the applicant in obtaining the Certificate of Designation, which representations were material to the Board's decision to issue the Certificate of Designation. At the hearing it was represented that water pollution would not occur and that the land filling operation would cease if it did. (Hearing of September 22, 1971, at Pages 4 and 30.) All materials contacting groundwater or surface water, or leeching contaminants into groundwater or surface water, should be ordered to be removed. FE 9210& 9 • • Ms. Connie Harbert January 18, 1993 Page 3 3. The Central Weld County Landfill has discharged pollutants into the waters of the State of Colorado and the United States, contrary to Subsection 2.1.2 of the Solid Waste Regulations, the Colorado Water Quality Control Act, C.R.S. 25-8- 501, and the Federal Clean Water Act. Such discharges should be ordered to cease immediately, and remedial action orders should be issued for the removal of contaminants from the environment which were released into the environment without a discharge permit. 4. Material representations were made to the Board at its public hearing of. September 22, 1971, that the Central Weld County Landfill's operating life would be fifteen years, or shorter, if groundwater or other geologic constraints were encountered (hearing of September 22, 1971, at Page 28 and page 41). The Landfill's operating life would be longer only if subsurface conditios so allowed. Based on such representations, the Certificate of Designation was issued by the Board, and said Certificate either contains an implied condition limiting the life of the Landfill to no more than fifteen years, which term has expired, or the Certificate of Designation was fraudulently obtained. In either circumstance, the term of years for operation of the landfill'has expired, the landfilling operation should be ordered to be terminated under the Certificate of Designation, and a closure and remedial action order should be entered. 5. The land use approval for the landfill was for burial below the surface of the ground, not for "air space" filling rights. Material representations were made on September 22, 1971, to the Board, during the Certificate of Designation hearing, that deposition into the landfill would not exceed the grade of the land which existed at the time the Board issued the Certificate of Designation, except for the possible cover of three to four feet of clean fill dirt, and that upon closure, the site would be graded or benched to conform with surrounding agricultural land uses. (Hearing of September 22, 1971, at Pages 16-17 and Pages 27-28.) No "air space" rights were applied for or granted by the Board, and the applicant represented that there was sufficient subsurface space and conditions to operate a landfill over a fifteen -year life below the surface. Despite these material representations, the pre-existing grade of the land has been altered and continues to be altered, contrary to the approved land use plan for the site under the Board's Certificate of Designation approval. Materials which cause the pre -landfill grade of the ground to be exceeded should be removed, and the site should be restored to the grade which existed at the time the Certificate of Designation was issued. 9ZI.06:! /0 Ms. Connie Harbert January 18, 1993 Page 4 6. The owners and operators of the landfill have allowed the ponding of water on the site, contrary to Subsections 2.1.4 and 2.2.2 of the Solid Waste Regulations. 7. The owners and operators of the Central Weld County Landfill have disposed of special wastes at the site without the required approvals. These wastes should be ordered to be removed. 8. The existence of the Central Weld County Landfill constitutes a public nuisance which should be enjoined, and the nuisance abated by restoration of the site to its pre-existing grade and removal of all materials which contact groundwater or surface water. 9. The facts and documents supporting revocation of the Certificate of Designation for the Central Weld County Landfill and abating the public nuisance caused by the Landfill are within the possession and control of the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, the Weld County Health Department, the Colorado Department of Health, Waste Services, Inc., Waste Management of North America, Inc., Mr. Brad Reirnes and the Keirnes Family. The Board should order Waste Services, Inc., Waste Management of North America, Inc., Mr. Brad Reirnes, and the Keirnes Family to produce for inspection and copying all documents and information which pertain to the Landfill and its operation throughout its existence. 10. Available information indicates that hazardous substances may have been released at the site. The County should investigate whether hazardous substances in reportable quantities have been released and, if so, whether the owners and operators of the site have complied with applicable reporting requirements, including the requirements of Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation & Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. S 9603. WHEREFORE, the Ashton -Daniels Neighborhood Group and Sam and Myrtle Telep request that the Certificate of Designation for the Central Weld County Landfill be revoked, that the landfill be determined to be a public nuisance, and that closure and remedial action orders be issued 1) for the restoration of the site to the grade which existed at the time the Certificate of Designation was issued, and 2) for removal of all materials which contact or cause the release of contaminants into the environment, including groundwater or surface water. g21A6t // Ms. Connie Harbert January 18, 1993 Page 5 DATED this 18th day of January , 1993. Respectfully sub- mitted by the Ashton -Daniels Neighborhood Association. Kent E. Hanson 885 Arapahoe Ave., Suite 216 Boulder, Colorado 80302 (303) 449-0600 GJH/det C: Gregory J. Hobbs, Jr. Hobbs, Trout & Raley, Jr. 1775 Sherman Street, Ste. 1300 Denver, Colorado 80203 (303) 861-1963 Ext. 123 Attorneys for Ashton -Daniels Neighborhood Associatton, and Sam and Myrtle Telep ■ Weld County Department of Health ■ Colorado Department of Health ■ Mr. Tom David bc: Sam Telep Kent Hanson If • e Transcript of Tape on 1971 County Hearing Central Weld Landfill we'll call this Hearing to order. Docket No. 54 Weld Landfill Incorporated, Box 596, Evans, Colorado Date: September 22nd, 1971. Time: 2 o'clock Request site approval for sanitary landfill At this time Mr. Connell you will read the record. Connell: Mr. Chairman, pursuant to notice properly given pursuant to the zoning laws of the of State of Colorado, a Public Hearing is now held in the offices of the Board of County Commissioners, Weld County, Colorado, the Weld County Courthouse, concerning Docket No. 54, Application of Weld County Landfill Incorporated, Lots 596, Evans, Colorado. Hearing does come on at this time and date as published. Publication has been had in accordance with law in the Greeley Daily Booster as shown by the Certificate of Publication of the publisher of the Greeley Daily Booster. The request is for site approval for a sanitary landfill located in the west 1/2 of the SW 1/4 in the 1 921 06_'. 13 Chairman: Voice 2: recorded in Book ill by the Secretary of the Weld County Planning Commission. RESOLUTION favorably recommending to the Board of County Commissioners the approval of this site location and approval. Thank you. At this time we'll hear from the people supporting this application. All of you having anything to do with the cause, let's have your opinion. Yes Mr. Chairman. We, Weld County Health Department, approve of the site on the grounds that we figure it is well above the water level; we won't have any water problems at all, like we have down on the river. Also, it is within a quarter of a mile of a black top road and about a mile, that's from the south, with about a mile and three quarters from the north is the black top road. We have studied the engineering reports from the soils and from the well, record and log from the well, and, therefore, we recommend this application be approved. I have also Mr. Orville Stoddard from the Water Pollution Commission and I would like Mr. Stoddard to comment. Chairman: All right, that's fine with... Mr. Stoddard? Stoddard: Thank you. My name is Orville Stoddard with the Engineering Section of Colorado Department of Health. There is an Amended Act pertaining to the regulation of land disposal sites and facilities that Earl Moffatt 4 921.06ft /$ mentioned. This requires the applicant to submit a report of engineering, geological, hydrological, and operational data to the Department for review and recommended approval prior to issue of the Certificate of Designation by the County Commissioners. The site was visited with Mr. Moffatt, Glen Paul of the Weld County Health Department, and at that time the guidelines for developing this report were reviewed with Mr. Moffatt. He did submit a report to the Department, August 9th, 1971, and did have considerable information of the type that we were after. The information submitted indicate after studying the soils reports, the test borings, information on the existing water table, soil conditions in the area, that this site can be operated in accordance with sanitary landfill requirements. Also, the Department is required to develop and promulgate rules and regulations pertaining to the engineering design and operation. These are to be presented to the Board of Health at their regular meeting in October for adoption. This is a suitable site and can be operated as a sanitary landfill. The only question we have at this point in time, and :fir. Moffatt touched on that, is that there are several alternatives in how the operation should proceed and this is just a matter of deciding which is the best way to go. 5 Waldo: Moffatt: Waldo: bottom. If you'd stop, cement the ditch, I think you would probably stop the seep, because I don't think that premises itself is irrigated enough to runoff excessive or even if it was it would cause a seep, and practically got to be from that carrier ditch, or premises above might be, being irrigated. Now, I have another question. What are you going to do with this land when they get through with it, using it for a landfill. -- We intend to make a good piece of farm ground out of it because the surface amount of dirt and we intend to cover more than is required by any law. In other words we intend to cover enough We won't know this exactly how much is until we get in there and see what our bottom is. Then we can find our balance points where it's no longer economical to dig deeper over the whole dirt past their points, you see. Then we probably have about a 3 -foot or more, maybe 4 -foot of cover on that ground when we're through with it. And it will be on, it will either be on even grade that will be practical to irrigate or be benched; droprcd down, then drawn out, you see. What will the elevations be like? How will they compare with the present elevations when you get this landfill completed? 16 921.06 /l • • Moffatt: Waldo: Moffatt: Waldo: Moffatt: Well it will be flat across there, more or less, on the -- running east and west. But, of course, you can still have..., then we'll have to allow back off the premises or when they reach the other part of the that's one of the reasons we won't be working too far to the West. We're going to have a slope on this, you see. A slope at all then under the road and this will take extra dirt, too. There's depression, I wouldn't call it a draw, but it's a draw of sorts, it runs down, oh, in an easterly side of this west half, this west 80 acres, is it your intention to use all of that for landfill and fill that in? If it's practical so we can. There's no reason why we can't, you know, from water or making It appears to be pretty seepy and wet in there now. But I think if we intercept all of it, that seepage --by going clear through and going to the top we should be able to intercept these places where they come through and if necessary and we can head the drain up there and make an L shape and bring this all out to where daylight is--. That piece of ground should not have any seep within the L shape; should not have water left in it there if we intercept it. 17 32106:' / 7- • in, and anything we take in on that $5,000 is returned to the County and credited off of the $5,000. For an example, the Windsor Landfill, this last year took enough in money even Kodak moving into that area and its off the County's back, they took in $5,000 or $7,000. Mikner: Well that's the reason I asked the question. Moffatt: Well, I want to make it clear, I've run into this before. The County's subsidizing everything you're doing. Well, the County is not subsidizing, only up to $5,000 and then any revenue that comes in is credited off of that five, so they get down, you see. Does that answer your question? (Muffled] Darryl (7) How long do you anticipate you could use this area for landfill. Well, Ralph, we're getting in a little better position to answer that now than when we first started because we know, and, of course, your area is growing and all these things, and then again we don't know how much of that ground we can actually use, just like we've been discussing, some of that ground might not be practical to do but we'll still try to turn it into something. But if we can use, say 80 acres of that ground to a depth of approximately 45 feet, I think Mikner: Waldo: Moffat-: 27 /1 Wagner: Connell: Wagner: Connell: Wagner: Voice 8: we'll have at least a 15 -year goal. At the present, if you increase it that much more for the cutdown (?) Ralph [Waldo], we figured around 60,000 population and we figure average about 5 lbs per person per day. So we figure about 300,000 lbs going into this place everyday and from there we figured anywhere from 15 to 25 years. That is if the conditions, like Earl stated, and you asking to stay away from the east side of the 80. Moffatt: So anything can influence it. If we can increase that 15 from what we planned, in other words if we go down to 80 and we find that we can work there practically, that's going to give you that much more time in that area. Now if it turns out that shale and sandstone is in there to the point to where it is not practical to move it, we've got to figure to balance the job out sooner, then that why I thought really conservative at 15 years, and they're trying to go further. Now, these well.... If I could interrupt, before we go too far beyond his statement, can we have Mr. Wagner's full name and address for the record please? Fleury Wagner, 4603 83rd Avenue, Greeley, Colorado. Thank you, Mr. Wagner 852-0347 28 921.06:". /9 • • Waldo: Moffatt: Waldo: Moffatt: Waldo: Stoddard: laws and under your common sense, you're not going to lay this down in pockets to be collected. You're going to have to daylight all the water out that will come in around your landfill. What about the seep condition that there is on that westerly slope of that land.... Ralph, when you say west are you saying across the draw on the west side and coming back sloping east. I'm saying on the east side of the draw. That whole hillside is seeping. I agree, but I think we are going to decide, I think we are going to intercept that water, we're going to divide it cut it off and turn it back into the draw. That's what I think we'll find. All right, now that brings me to the next question. Mr. Stoddard if they can't cut that water off, then it will be your job to stop the landfill, is that right? Yeh, I have to agree, I think with Earl, we won't really know until we get into it more. Yes, it will have to be diverted either around the fill or, there are other ways of doing it. It can be piped underneath the fill with certain precautionary measures taken to keep any seepage into the culvert or whatever they use under the fill. The important thing that we will be looking at, of course, is to make sure that water 30 /.f sziosn 026 • pollution does not occur from this operation in any way shape or form. Waldo: How often will your department make an inspection. Stoddard: We're, we make annual inspections at this point in time and certainly think that your idea of more frequent inspections would be better. Waldo: If they were; if they just found unsuitable it would be the job of your department not the Weld County Health Department to shut it down, or is it both departments? We're together on it. I mean, if Glen Paul thinks there's a problem there, then they would contact us and we would.... Ralph, I don't think there's any problem here that we don't have a solution. In other words, but we've got to determine whether it's practical, like we said, we can put a drag line underneath. You're talking about a minute amount of water that's coming at a time, you're not talking about a large body there. Well, it just keeps coming. Certainly, but once you put it under control and put in a small pipe or pipe beside the cut, it won't increase because it still comes from a given point, see. Stoddard: Moffatt: Waldo: Moffatt: Waldo: Well, that kind of bothers me too, because we don't know what development there's going to be to the /74 31 gy1.O6'', �/ Waste Services Corporation 6037 77th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80634 303/330-2641 February 5, 1993 • Mr. Roger Doak Colorado Department of Health 4300 Cherry Creek Drive, South Denver, CO 80222-1530 r _2 55 rt rJ A Waste Manag.),,a�• Car acv CERTIFIED RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED P 024916-657 Re: RESPONSES TO CDH COMMENTS ON ADDITIONAL HYDROGEOLOGICAL AND GEOTECHNICAL CHARACTERIZATION AND SITE OPERATIONS, FOR CENTRAL WELD SANITARY LANDFILL, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Dear Mr. Doak: This letter is in response to Colorado Department of Health (CDH) comments of December 21, 1992 on the subject reports later discussed during a January 20, 1993 meeting at CDH. The CDH comments are reiterated below verbatim, followed by detailed responses prepared with the assistance of Golder Associates, Inc. A. ISSUES WHICH ARE INCOMPLETE OR NEEDING CLARIFICATION Comment No. 1: Point #2 from the October 27, 1992 letter sent by the Division requested a cross-section relating the on -site geology and hydrology to all ground water wells within a 1/4 mile of the facility. Please provide this information. Response: WSC provided an initial response dated December 2, 1992 to CDH Comment #2. Below is a summary of that response: ► Only one ground water well is located within 1/4 mile of the landfill which is approximately 500 feet north and east (upgradient) of the landfill; and, ► No well completion information, including well logs, screen depth, and well completion diagrams, is available for this well. wp5111b\Idm\Feb02.01 F: CWSL 3.2.93 • • Mr. Roger Doak February 5, 1993 Page 2 Based on the lack of geologic and hydrogeologic information for the well located within a 1/4 mile of the landfill, it is not possible to construct a cross-section relating the on -site geology and hydrology to the off -site well. Comment No. 2: Please provide documentation which would identify if the retention pond is in direct communication with the ground water, and provide clarification between the relationship of the retention pond and the ground water. Response: Based on clarification provided by the CDH during the Januar)/ 20, 1993 meeting, it is understood that the CDH comment was directed at the potential relationship between the pond and the mound of shallow ground water identified west of the pond (please refer to the "Hydrogeologic and Geotechnical Characterization Report" for additional background information). The retention pond is located approximately 400 feet east and side gradient of the ground water mound. As shown on Figure 4-1A and 4-18 included in the "Hydrogeologic and Geotechnical Characterization Report," the water level in the retention pond is lower than the elevation of the ground water mound inferred to exist west of the pond. Based on the water levels, the pond is not a potential recharge source of the water level mound. Comment No. 3: There seems to be some confusion over Point #8 from the October 27, 1992 letter. The Division requests cross -sections along (intercepting monitoring points TP-1, TP-6, and GWMW-7) and perpendicular (intercepting monitoring points GWMW-6, TP-6, TP-7, SG - 14, and SG -11) to the underdrain. The Division apologizes for any misunderstanding. Response: The cross -sections requested by the Division have been prepared and are enclosed as Figure 2 to this response letter. Please note that as -built elevations for the underdrain are not available. Therefore, the underdrain elevations shown on Figure 2 are approximations only, wp51\Ib\I&m\Feb0101 F: CWSL 32.93 321.06n a • • Mr. Roger Doak February 5, 1993 Page 3 Comment No. 4: Please provide as -built drawings for the perimeter french drain. If as -built drawings are not available, provide an illustration which shows the extent of lined portions, thickness and types of construction materials, and relationship of geologic and saturated geologic units to the french drain. Response: As -built drawings for the perimeter french drain are included in the enclosed report prepared by Industrial Compliance, Inc. (IC) dated November 12, 1992. Comment No. 5: The Division requests that additional hydrogeologic evaluations be performed west of the facility. This investigation shall determine whether Spomer Lakes are influencing ground water charadteristics along the western boundary of the facility. Response: The existing ground water monitoring network, is considered sufficient to determine the potential interrelationship between Spomer Lakes and the ground water along the western boundary of the facility. As discussed in the "Hydrogeologic and Geotechnical Characterization Report," water levels from the monitoring wells and soil gas probes can be used to identify recharge/discharge relationships between the lakes and the ground water. Vertical hydraulic gradient data near Spomer Lakes discussed in Section 4.4 of the "Hydrogeologic and Geotechnical Characterization Report" suggest that the lakes may be locally recharging ground water. It was noted in the report that seasonal variations in ground water may affect the relationship between the lakes and the shallow ground water. WSC will continue to collect ground water data as part of our quarterly environmental monitoring program which can be used to determine the potential seasonal variations to further address CDH concerns. Comment No. 6: To understand the relationship between the quality of ground water from the private wells in the vicinity of the site and those at the facility, the Division requests that the following wp51\lb\l@m\Feb02.01 P: CWSL 9.293 Mr. Roger Doak February 5, 1993 Page 4 wells be sampled, (permit #159091, #765, #11090, and #90580). These wells shall be analyzed for the identical parameters as the monitoring wells at the facility. Please provide cross -sections through the private wells to show the relationship of the landfill geologic and saturated geologic units to those of the private wells. Response: During the January 20, 1993 meeting CDH indicated that it agreed with WSCs' concerns regarding the capability of samples collected from the private wells to identify impacts from the landfill and generate geologic cross -sections through private wells to relate to the landfill. The CDH comment incorporates two primary components: (1) sampling and analysis of ground water from the private wells; and (2) generating cross -sections through the private wells. Each component is discussed below. 1. SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS OF GROUND WATER FROM THE PRIVATE WELLS Sampling ground water from the wells identified above is unlikely to provide reliable information for comparison to ground water quality at the landfill due to (1) the demonstrated limited extent of impacts to ground water from the landfill, (2) different completion depths of selected private wells, and (3) unknown completion techniques for the private wells, and (4) other potential impacts to ground water quality. (a) Limited Exsent of Impacts to Ground Water from the Landfill Additional hydrogeologic characterization activities conducted at the site subsequent to submittal of the "Hydrogeologic and Geotechnical Characterization Report" revealed that volatile organic compound concentrations in the shallow aquifer are limited to within approximately 25 feet of the south side of the landfill (see letter report entitled "Expanded Hydrogeological Investigation at the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill," October 23, 1992). Of the downgradient wells listed by the CDH (i.e., permit #765, 11090, and 90580), the closest is approximately 2000 feet from the landfill and the farthest is approximate 4500 feet from the landfill. Based on these data, the downgradient wells are at least 10 times farther from the landfill than the extent of detectable volatile organic compounds. This indicates that analysis of wpS1\Ib\IRm\Feb02.01 P: CWSL 12.93 831.06' S Mr. Roger Doak February 5, 1993 Page 5 ground water from the private monitoring wells will not provide useful information for comparison to the ground water quality at the landfill. Since the remaining well (permit #159091) is located upgradient approximately 500 feet from the landfill, it would be inappropriate to use this well to determine impacts from the landfill. (b) Different Completion Depths of Selected Wells Table 1-2 of the "Hydrogeologic and Geotechnical Characterization Report" includes depths of the wells (permit #765, #11090 and #90580) as provided by the State Engineer's office. The depth of well (permit #159091) has not been reported to the State Engineer's office. However, based on available information, this well is upgradient of the landfill. As shown on Table 1-2, the well with permit #765 is completed to a depth of 263 feet and well with permit #11090 and #90580 are completed at shallow depth (i.e. less than 40 feet) below ground surface. Additional information subsequently obtained from the State Engineer's office indicates that screened interval for this well (permit #765) is from 233 to 263 feet below ground surface. The screened interval is approximately 200 feet deeper than the shallow aquifer beneath the landfill. Based on this deep completion interval and the absence of any detectable contamination in onsite deep wells, sampling of the offsite residential deep well is not necessary. (c) Unknown Completion_TeShnigy&es The drilling and completion techniques used on the downgradient wells are unknown but were likely much less stringent than the drilling and completion techniques used to complete the monitoring wells at the landfill. Incomplete decontamination procedures inappropriate well completion materials (such as carbon steel, grease, oils, etc.) and inadequate well maintenance and security often render monitoring of private wells unreliable. Based on the limited extent of impacts from the landfill, the deep completion depths for selected wells, and the unknown completion techniques of the wells, sampling of the private wells is considered inappropriate for understanding the relationship between the quality of ground water in the vicinity of the site and at the facility. fd) Other Potential Impacts to Ground Water Ouality wp51\Ib\Iffim\Feb02.01 F: CWSL 3.2.93 321.46, 5 • • Mr. Roger Doak February 5, 1993 Page 6 In addition to potential impacts from CWSL to surrounding ground water quality, past land use impacts including agricultural practices can impact ground water quality. For instance, pesticide and fertilizer application, equipment maintenance and septic systems, all may be potential impacts not from CWSL. 2. GENERATING CROSS -SECTIONS THROUGH THE PRIVATE WELLS In response to CDH comment #2 from the October 27, 1992 letter, an additional review of the information on file with the State Engineer's office was conducted for the private wells identified above. Of the four wells identified by the CDH, geologic information is available for only two (permit #765 and #11090). These wells are located approximately 4500 and 3000 feet east of the landfill, respectively. The great distance from the landfill to these wells renders geologic and hydrogeologic interpretation unreliable due to the great intervening distance for which no data exists. Furthermore, as is typical, the geologic data collected during drilling of these wells is incomplete and inadequate for proper comparison to the data collected at the landfill. For example, geologic data collected for well #11090 included only three units: gravel, clay, and sandstone. Gravels were the predominant geologic unit identified for this well. No gravels were encountered at the landfill. Accordingly, it is not possible to reliably correlate the geology at the landfill to the geology at this well. Based on the great distance from the landfill to the downgradient wells which have geologic data, combined with the sparse geologic data available for the wells and the grossly different geologic conditions at the wells, construction of geologic cross - sections through the private wells to show the relationship of the landfill geologic units to those of the private wells is technically inappropriate and not possible. Comment No. 7: Figure 1 from "Responses to Colorado Department of Health Comments on the Hydrogeologic and Geotechnical Characterization Report for the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill" indicates an historical maximum water level. What is the date of this water level? Please illustrate the top of the ground water surface between monitoring points. Ground water is shown below the completion depth of trash piezometer TP-4. Please provide an explanation/data which verifies the depth of ground water at this location. wps1\Ib\IA m\Feb02.01 R CWSL 3.2.93 921,,!6" Mr. Roger Doak February 5, 1993 Page 7 Response: The date of the historical maximum water level shown on Figure 1 is March and April of 1992, based on data collected by Golder. The dates have been added to the figure to provide clarification. The ground water surface between the monitoring points has been added to the figure. As discussed in the footnotes included and illustrated in Figure 1, the ground water level in TP-4 (4762.36) as reported by Golder on 4/28/92 is similar to the ground water level elevation reported by IC (4764.90) on 1/4/91. IC reports the completion elevation of TP-4 as 4766.76, but notes in their report that subsequent completion depth measurements of the piezometers differ from the original measurements taken following installation, in some cases 3 to 6 feet. However, a reason for this difference was not determined, but, this should not affect any of the ground water data presented. Verification of the completion depth of the piezometer will be included in the first quarter 1993 monitoring event. Comment No. 8: Please explain why the detection limits were increased (Central Weld Sanitary Landfill Third Quarter 1992 Ground Water Monitoring Results) for volatile organic analyses for monitoring well GWMW-5N. It appears that these limits were raised exclusively on GWMW-5N. In addition, VOC samples from monitoring wells GWMW-5N and GWMW- 10, when checked by the lab (PX), did not have the required preservation of a pH less than 2. In the Division's judgment these samples are invalid and these wells must be resampled. Response: Since receipt of this comment, CWSL has provided additional information to CDH that we believe adequately responds to this comment. CWSL provided an explanation concerning the detection limits in a letter submitted to WCDH and CDH on December 12, 1992. This letter was in response to the WCDH comments on the CWSL third quarter 1992 ground water sampling results. CWSL believes the results for GWMW-5N and GWMW-10 are valid based on the January 20, 1993, information from SEC -Donohue that is enclosed for your review. wpsl\Ib\I&m\Feb02.01 F: CWSL 3.2.93 SZa.O6' Mr. Roger Doak February 5, 1993 Page 8 Additionally, these wells were resampled as part of the CWSL fourth quarter sampling event conducted during December 1992. B. OPERATIONAL IMPROVEM NE "TS Comment No. 1: In the judgment of the Division, the number of ground water monitoring points are not adequate for the southeastern boundaries of the facility to delineate contaminant migration. To improve the ground water monitoring situation the Division request that additional nested wells be installed along the south and southeastern property boundaries. Please provide all information to the Division for review. Response: The CDH and WSC discussed this issue during the January 20, 1993 meeting and agreed to delay submittal of a response to this comment until additional information regarding designation of point of compliance wells at the site is determined by WSC. Comment No. 2: Please provide documentation which demonstrates that the french drain is adequate to transport water and prevent continued infiltration to the shallow aquifer. If the construction of the perimeter french drain is not appropriate, please provide design improvements. Response: The french drain was not installed to prevent recharge to the shallow aquifer but rather was installed to control infiltration to the landfill from off -site irrigation activities of the site. As discussed in the January 20, 1993 meeting, it is assumed that CDH intended for WSC to demonstrate that the french drain is adequate for controlling infiltration to the landfill from off -site irrigation activities north and east of the site. Documentation was previously given as response to CDH Comment No. 6 in WSC's letter of December 2, 1992. This response stated that seasonal rises in ground water levels immediately east of the landfill in response to irrigation activities do not occur within the landfill near the french drain. The lack of water level rise within the wµ51\Ib\l&m\Peb02.01 P: CWSL 32.93 Mr. Roger Doak February 5, 1993 Page 9 landfill near the french drain indicates that the drain is effective in controlling the migration of irrigation water east of the landfill onto the site. Comment No. 3: Surface water sample locations (landfill underdrain, north discharge pipe, discharge from the french drain into the retention pond, and Spomer Lakes) shall be sampled for eight (8) consecutive quarters. Response: As discussed during the January 20, 1993 meeting, surface water sampling at the site will be regulated by the Water Quality Control Division and will be coordinated with the Solid Waste Division of the CDH. Accordingly, it is understood that this particular comment is no longer applicable. Comment No. 4: All deep ground water monitoring wells shall be monitored for eight (8) consecutive quarters and include all parameters as required by the Division. Monitoring frequency and parameters may be modified., at the request of the applicant and approval of the Division, after completion of required background sampling. Response: All deep ground water monitoring wells will be monitored for eight (8) consecutive quarters for the parameters to be agreed upon by the CDH and WSC. After completion of the eight (8) quarters of sampling, CDH and WSC will review the results and evaluate the sampling frequency and parameter list as appropriate based on the results obtained. Comment No. 5: The proposed revised Solid Waste Regulations do not allow for field filtering of water samples. Please make this change in all texts and implement this plan during the next sampling event. wp51\Ib\I&m\Feb02.01 F: CWSL 3293 SZ1.%s, 9 • • Mr. Roger Doak February 5, 1993 Page Page 10 Response: It is agreed that field filtering of samples to be analyzed for total alkalinity, total organic carbon, volatile organic compounds, and specified conductance is inappropriate, as specified in the "Ground Water Monitoring Plan" for the site, However, as further stated in the "Ground Water Monitoring Plan", field filtering of samples to be analyzed for metals is considered necessary in order to avoid false data which are not representative of the constituents actually present in the ground water. In addition, altering sample procedures to comply with draft regulations is not considered appropriate, since draft regulations are often revised prior to becoming final. As a matter of fact, we understand a proposed rule lifting the ban on field filtering is being considered by EPA. Finally, Section 2.2.3 of the Solid Waste regulations currently requires the collection and analysis of dissolved (i.e., filtered) iron, cadmium, lead, mercury. zinc, and manganese. If these samples were collected and analyzed for the parameters without field filtering, the facility would be in violation of currently existing regulations. Field filtering of metals samples will be revised if necessary after the proposed Solid Waste Regulations are finalized. However, until the proposed regulations are finalized, it is appropriate to continue to field filtered metal samples in accordance with existing regulations. Comment No. 6: Table 5-1 in the "Ground Water Monitoring Plan for the Central weld Sanitary Landfill, Weld County, Colorado" is inadequate. The following parameters shall be added to Table 5.1: all 34 volatile organic compounds (VOCs) included in the "Hydrogeological and Geotechnical Characterization for the Central Weld Sanitary Landfill;" carbon disulfide: dichlorodifluoromethane and trichlorofluoromethane; radionuclides; chromium; barium and nickel. Table 5-1 shall be changed to read "Ground Water and Surface Water Parameter List Central Weld Sanitary Landfill." Response: The parameter list specified on Table 5-1 of the "Ground Water Monitoring Plan" complies with current regulations governing sampling and analysis of ground water at solid waste landfills (see Section 2.2.3 of the Solid Waste Regulations) and also wp5l\Ib\term \FeD02.O1 F: CWSL 3.2.93 gZ1,06-'- /0 Mr. Roger Doak February 5, 1993 Page 11 includes additional volatile organic compounds not specified in the Solid Waste Regulations but which were detected in shallow ground water. Accordingly, the parameter list specified in Table 5-1 is appropriate. The basis for requesting the additional parameters listed above is unclear. WSC has demonstrated that only a select few volatile organic compounds are present in ground water at the site. These compounds are included in the monitoring plan. Radionuclide concentrations have been shown to represent natural conditions. Chromium was detected in only one sample. Barium concentrations were all below the State of Colorado primary drinking water standard of 1.0 mg/I and were determined to be present as a result of natural, geologic sources. As discussed at our January 20, 1993 meeting WSC agrees to add chromium, barium and nickel to the parameter list in Table 5.1. However, before adding additional VOCs, WSC respectfully requests CDH reconsider the request for additional parameters and require only those parameters detected in previous sampling events. WSC agrees also to add radionuclides to Table 5-1 but, because it is naturally occurring, we suggest the frequency be annually rather than quarterly. Enclosed for your information is a study entitled "A Comparison of Chemical Constituents in Industrial Hazardous Waste and Municipal Waste Landfill Leachates" which was prepared for Waste Management of North America, Inc. (WMNA) to evaluate the presence of VOCs at municipal solid waste landfills. This report shows from using a national compilation of leachate data from municipal solid waste landfills that only a few and relatively low levels of volatile organic compounds are present. Consequently, we request your reconsideration to allow WSC to continue with its recommended list of parameter as modified by this response. Comment No. 7: All piezometers shall be monitored for depth to ground water. Monitoring shall be conducted during each quarterly sampling event and data submitted to the Division. Response: In response to the CDH comment, water levels in the piezometers will be monitored on a quarterly basis and the data will be submitted to the CDH. wp$t\Ib\lam \Feb02.0I F: CWSL 3,2.93 SZ1.n&! l/ Mr. Roger Doak February 8, 1993 Page 12 Comment No. 8: The Division requests that those constituents identified from monitoring well GWMW-5N (target parameter list) be analyzed on a monthly basis. Sampling shall commence during January 1993 and continue for twelve (12) consecutive months. Routine quarterly sample of this well shall continue for the established suite of parameters. If additional constituents are identified during quarterly sampling, they will be added to the target list. The Division will evaluate sample frequency and parameters after completion of this sampling schedule. Response: Any benefit of monthly sampling of GWMW-5N would be minimal. Data obtained during the hydrogeologic study of the site indicates that ground water flow within the shallow aquifer is approximately 95 feet per year with idealized optimum conditions. This corresponds to a flow rate of approximately 8 feet per month and 24 feet per quarter. Monthly samples would therefore represent ground water which had migrated only about 8 feet from the previous month. This flow rate is so small that monthly sampling is unlikely to provide any significantly increased protection to human health and the environment when compared to quarterly ground water sampling. In fact, and due to real world conditions such as a cone of depression established during sampling and at a flow rate of 8 feet per month, it is likely that a significant portion of each month's ground water samples will include ground water which was sampled during the previous month. This type of mixing of samples is unlikely to provide an accurate characterization of the ground water quality changes near GWMW-5N. As clarified by the CDH during the January 20, 1993 meeting, the CDH comment was prepared based on a concern regarding potential impacts from off -site upgradient irrigation activities on the water quality data for GWMW-5N. However, this concern should be minimal given the great distance between off -site upgradient irrigation activities and GWMW-5N the interceding influence of the french drain and the flow rate fcr the shallow ground water near the site. As shown on Figure 4-lA and 4-1B in the "Hydrogeologic and Geotechnical Characterization Report," the distance between the closest off -site upgradient source of irrigation water and GWMW-5N is approximately 1200 feet. Section 4.3.1 of the "Hydrogeologic and Geotechnical Characterization Report" states that shallow ground water flow at the site is approximately 95 feet per year. Accordingly, assuming that the perimeter french drain did not intercept the irrigation water (i.e., a worst -case scenario), approximately 12.5 years would be needed for the off -site upgradient irrigation water to reach GWMW-5N. This time frame is wp5111b1kten1Peb02.01 F: CWSL 3.2.93 .921 06". is • • Mr. Roger Doak February 8, 1993 Page 13 excessively long and indicates that monthly sampling of GWMW-5N will not provide information which is any more reliable or useful than is the quarterly ground water monitoring information to be collected. Based on the hydrogeology of the site, WSC requests that sampling of GWMW-5N be continued on a quarterly basis to provide reliable results with which to determine potential impacts on human health and the environment. C. AREAS OF NON OjPLIANC Comment No. 1: Central Weld Sanitary Landfill has contaminated the ground water. This is a violation of subsection 2.1.4 of the Regulations. The Regulations clearly state a site and facility operated as a sanitary landfill shall prevent water pollution. Please provide a corrective action plan which addresses the contamination issues on and off site. Response: As requested by CDH during our meeting on January 20, 1993, the enclosed legal interpretation of Section 2.1.4 was prepared and is attached for your review. Based upon this interpretation, WSC believes CWSL is in compliance with Section 2.1.4 of the Regulations. WSC would request that CDH consider removing this issue as an area of non-compliance and provide written clarification in this regard. WSC has reviewed potential remedial options as you requested and has provided its recommendations to the CDH in the December 17, 1992 letter describing a corrective action plan. Comment No. 2: Solid wastes have been placed into ground water at this facility. The Purpose, Scope and Applicability as defined in Section 3 of the proposed revised State's Solid Waste Regulations, defines standards for new landfills, existing landfills and lateral expansions. Subsection 3.1.11 (draft of November 5, 1992) states landfills shall not be place wastes below or into surface water or ground water ....fl Please be aware, the Division fully expects the proposed revised Solid Waste Regulations will become effective in the very near future. At that time Central Weld Sanitary Landfill will be in violation of area 'C', point #2 as detailed above. wp5njbU&m1Fe602.01 F: CWSL 3.2,93 Mr. Roger Doak February 5, 1993 Page 14 Response: Since this comment addresses a potential area of non-compliance if proposed regulations are adopted without change, it is our understanding that, any issue of compliance will be addressed, when a regulation is adopted. We are monitoring the proposed regulation carefully and will ensure that the facility is in compliance with any requirements ultimately adopted. We would like to state, however, that there is no evidence that waste was ever placed in ground water at CWSL. Interviews with employees indicate that waste was not placed in ground water during the time of their employment (1979 to present). We have separately requested clarification of this proposed regulation as part of our ongoing participation with you incorporating USEPA Subtitle D into Colorado's regulations. Until this regulation is adopted, we further request your clarification to indicate this is not an area of non-compliance. Please contact me if you have any questions about these responses. We appreciate the opportunity to meet with CDR on January 20, 1993 and believe future meetings will facilitate our working relationship. Sincerely, Bill Hedberg Division Vice President - Landfill Operations Enclosures BH/mmp wp31\Ib\lam\Fth02.01 F: CWSI. 3.2,9) SZ1.4s' /SL Mr. Roger Doak February 5, 1993 Page 15 cc: Glenn Mallory, CDH, w/enclosure John Pickle, WCHD, w/o enclosure Lee Morrison, Weld County, w/o enclosure B. Taylor, CDH, WQCD w/o enclosure L. Perrault, Colorado Attorney General, w/enclosure C. Cunliffe, WCPD, w/o enclosure A. Scheere, WSC, w/enclosure Constance Harbert, Weld County Commissioner, w/o enclosure Bill Webster, Weld County Commissioner, w/o enclosure Dale Hall, Weld County Commissioner, w/o enclosure George Baxter, Weld County Commissioner, w/o enclosure Barbara Kirkmeyer, Weld County Commissioner, w/o enclosure Ward Herst, Golder Associates, Inc. wp5111n\IRmWWV1.01 F. CWSL3.2.93 321.06_:. /5 Hello