The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About900222.tiff 50 I. °i EF Erg" 1 ♦ • lilt a41 / f_ ■ @@F @: C g a`i Ra& a @• ss Cn fa 71 E . t9iO 4 . . ■ eF. c pe eQ .1,-- iit 3 ( gG'i I • ill TS a 0 a u MCA Ai If P PO i P oi : 6o RIZ t ri F i l ee A°-I4 a rl iR \ I as nZ 1 ._ -- _WELD COD•Ti ROAD/29 Ph w —F--_, —Ems —, 3 rill; gat � ➢ 1 I t, \ El e 4Q p °w' `[rI�I ,1iS eLL P ii a t1 I i i L ab a.b hid 1 C Ib a \ \mil V4�q a e 1 R Sr 2 • idt, I IR x Yit o1= � � l iTy f er El;m O��hit,nm i : [ cc' : e i :e iT\ ii&, goi li iliiii i@!Ela @ii:3@6la €F eee a§a1i9 agE l! e-a a ! ;;99! !4$ "i -z? k k e3a • ;.,-9 a 5 i@ 18 eee• I ,4 iF ei@i a.-d ki •a@o l3 ! a '� S o 1 gill - @ `eee i`-- tU s a €9 - ?:@@t . - all@ a I@ € la@�� cacr '33 �aa2 Pill as-1 ,_p1Ea i ea : Ae! Ill"! @a::a C e c:a `•, � e 4Fi @a 9c aE a a oa_ll as � ca8 n r a g c oa: a . § aea E a a • :�i ° • gal a FR1 E a I a Ni2 @! dill ; • Iti S •od Rig ii 6 i� @@ e 5 it j� ilia ag ) v & 8 -tt MP i II lh ` . r Riiil ii CF �S 1i C I koernw � . i 99 iiSS u�\ - _-\ ,A W£L C?;. ROAp/P9 _ R�zi q ill \ ;O Pr . 1 i•\r‘ ,.9 ‘ i' ,. K LI If 1040,4 \\ & 4 ; i „, fitiTi----1 \: eielli .1 I. I A.. liflallqA d& "`�, /'� `` ._ s-1 L4Rfiltlil ._,� ''`'' s... ..f j L..,..__Z ,,,, ,, ,,„, w,, I N 1 i9434 iii'iail. vhi rn \k,\k\ I 51 X. gg !fp IS re Irr fi Ei le imi =.iFe [; ilo PNF, ' ' j !t 1 sia if '1 ` sif=1 Eig} I. ,iiii I ss"¢ sF£ - gig gS i, r: Wig IEli __ EE;i I LI _r - 1 g=2 ii9i yrit irl1 =E 4cf �„I !1,1i1:1 cc •S.�- i nI sI 1 i. riia 3 ' F fe- 4 yli l 4:1 -E. A f' :it a •""''',p.,. -- — .ip r$i F. h_₹ fi ; fi rc 'l t i I i cl 0! ri r £li €f cif El Erg. !ra Ca i I ..1r�x:ve� r2 ccr i� i°i 5 € II: sill. iie :i £ �? -- g-- rr- ii i�; ij sy r ='r ht Ei i 'eF i([� e5o ilg � 5 ----ig i r "seelr t 3 fl F. qk } Ohl: y82 &! JiepoE,FefEifiz `fileIreFE ii" NE ? O ! F;4.`1 'rifiitiEY Ii!1I is i. :iE ;gr ` - ii . iEli `riiiIi ifr•` f`lli F fFi fil rr- teIlia€ -e 'ifs "£: FF E-- if r a .r,(o. I Pit liraEyi!: i r 6£`6 sgf6�i Fi €iai-.i$ i c1 3 i pr. 5 2a li I4 s_' i I` 1 r n a ills if ." i£y! as !: E ig'£ £i! i w l' I 1 n ' G riviTE f.' E iF iy c � E: F: 'c— r rqii:rf F i� �� it fr it rc It ` �' �'� E ai N 451 )! ;Rfr`iicp s!'1i ,6 .f Ei 1-4;' f 1Z - C?r? EI.F£Fcl EEsic Fe Fi 4 a;I rF r RESOLUTION RE: APPROVE SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT FOR A GRAVEL MINING OPERATION IN THE AGRICULTURAL ZONE DISTRICT - DANIEL AND MILDRED BUXMAN WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners held a public hearing on the 7th day of March, 1990, at the hour of 10: 00 a.m. in the Chambers of the Board for the purpose of hearing the application of Daniel and Mildred Buxman, 30598 Weld County Road 29, Greeley, Colorado 80634, for a Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit for a gravel mining operation in the Agricultural Zone District on the following described real estate, to-wit: Part of the SEi NW} and NE$ SWI of Section 33, Township 6 North, Range 66 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado WHEREAS, said applicant was represented by Vern Nelson, of Nelson Engineers, and WHEREAS, Section 24 .4 .2 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance provides standards for review of said Special Review Permit, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners heard all of the testimony and statements of those present, has studied the request of the applicant and the recommendations of the Weld County Planning Commission and all of the exhibits and evidence presented in this matter and, having been fully informed, finds that this request shall be approved for the following reasons: 1 . The submitted materials are in compliance with the application requirements of Sections 24 .7 , 44 . 1 , 44 .2 and 44 .3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 2. It is the opinion of the Board of County Commissioners that the applicant has shown compliance with Section 24 . 4. 2 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: a. This proposal is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan' s Mineral Resource Goals and Policies, the Urban Growth Boundary Area Goals and Policies, and the Transportation Goals and Policies. The Conditions of Approval and Tit Qsqs 900222 Page 2 RE: USR - BUXMAN Development Standards will ensure that these goals and policies are met. The Comprehensive Plan encourages the extraction of mineral resources when the mining plan promotes reasonable and orderly development of the mineral resources. b. The proposal is consistent with the intent of the Agricultural Zone District and is provided for as a Use by Special Review. c. Conditions of Approval and Development Standards will ensure compatibility with the existing surrounding land uses. Surrounding land uses include agricultural production, pasture, the Cache La Poudre River, and rural residential home sites. d. The proposed use will not have an adverse effect on the existing and future development of the surrounding area as permitted by Weld County and the City of Greeley' s Comprehensive Plans. The City of Greeley Planning Commission has reviewed this proposal and recommended conditional approval. The conditions are addressed in the attached Conditions of Approval and Development Standards. e. The Special Review Permit site is located in the 100-year flood plain. Special Review Permit Development Standards address the overlay district requirements. No other overlay districts affect the site. f. Special Review Development Standards will provide adequate protection of the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood and County. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the application for a Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit for a gravel mining operation in the Agricultural Zone District on the hereinabove described parcel of land be, and hereby is , granted subject to the following conditions: 1 . The attached Development Standards for the Special Review Permit shall be placed on the Special Review plat prior to recording the plat. The plat shall be delivered to the Department of Planning Services and be ready for recording in the office of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder within 15 days of approval by the Board of County Commissioners. 900222 Page 3 RE: USR - BUXMAN 2 . The Special Review activity shall not occur nor shall any building or electrical permits be issued on the property until the Special Review plat is ready to be recorded in the office of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. 3 . Prior to the Special Review Permit activity occurring on the site, evidence shall be submitted to the Department of Planning Services that: a. The Division of Water Resources has approved a well permit or other legal water supply for the mining operation. b. A 404 permit has been issued by the Army Corps of Engineers, if applicable. c. An emissions permit has been obtained from Air Pollution Control Division, Colorado Department of Health, for fugitive dust and odors, if required. d. -The Use by Special Review activity will not cause _injury to vested or conditional water rights as set forth in Section 44 . 4 . 11 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 4 . Prior to recording the Special Review Permit plat: -a. An o₹f-site road improvements and maintenance agreement shall approved by the Board of County Commissioners to mitigate impacts generated by the operation to County roads. A copy of the agreement shall be submitted to the Department of Planning _Services. b. The Special Review Permit plat shall be amended to show a total of fifty feet right-of-way reservation from the centerline of Weld County Road 29 . c. 72he applicant shall amend the plat to show setback of the excavation boundaries to be in compliance with requirements of the Mined Land Reclamation Board. 900222 Page 4 RE: USR - BUXMAN 5 . The following note shall be placed on the Special Review Permit plat: NOTE : The Mined Land Reclamation Board has the authority to issue permits for mining and reclamation activities. Activities related to mining and reclamation are, therefore, under the jurisdiction of the Mined Land Reclamation Board. However, Weld County has jurisdiction of those matters outlined in the Development Standards. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 7th day of March, A.D. , 1990 . BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: �t� WELD UNTY, COLORADO Weld County erk and Recorder A Qr u. and Clerk to the Board Gene R. Bran n r, Chairman BY: “2 Geo Kennedy, Pro-Tem� eputy County lerk APPROVED AS FORM: one L. Har e t C.W. Kirby C unty Attorney Gordo cy 900222 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Daniel and Mildred Buxman USR-900 1 . The Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit is for a gravel mining operation as submitted in the application materials on file in the Department of Planning Services and subject to the Development Standards stated herein. 3 . Approval of this plan may create a vested property right pursuant to Article 68 of Title 24 , C.R.S. , as amended. 3 . The gravel mining operation shall comply with Section 44 .4 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. Any violation of these regulations shall be grounds for enforcement of Section 44 .6 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 4 . The haul route for the mining operation shall be Weld County Road 29 (71st Avenue) north to Weld County Road 64 . No hauling shall be allowed south on Weld County Road 29 . The applicant shall post a sign at the exit from the pit explaining this Standard. 5 . The property shall be maintained in compliance with the Weld County Flood Hazard Overlay District requirements. 6 . The property shall be maintained in compliance with Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, if applicable. 7 . The mining activity shall be maintained in compliance with the requirements of the Oil and Gas Conservation Commission. 8 . Waste oil and other associated liquid and solid wastes shall -be stored and removed for final disposal in a manner that protects against surface and groundwater contamination. 9. No permanent disposal of wastes shall be permitted at this site. 10. All waste materials shall be handled, stored, and disposed of in a manner that controls fugitive dust, blowing debris, and other potential nuisance conditions. 11 . The Special Review Permit site shall be maintained in compliance with the required emissions permit obtained from the Air -Pollution Control Division, Colorado Department of Health, for fugitive dust and odors. 900222 Page 2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - BUXMAN 12 . Fugitive dust shall be controlled on this site -at all times. 13 . The maximum permissible noise level shall not exceed the light industrial limit of 70 dB (A) , as measured according to 25-12-102, Colorado Revised Statutes. 14 . an individual sewage disposal system or a vault shall be used as the sewage disposal system for the site. The system or vault shall to installed according to the Weld County Individual Sewage Disposal Regulations. 15 . All construction on the property shall be in accordance with the requirements of the Weld County Building Code Ordinance. 16- The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Design Standards of Section 24 .3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 17. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Operation Standards of Section 24 .6 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 18. Personnel from the Weld County Health Department and Weld County Department of Planning Services shall be granted -access onto the property at any reasonable time in order to ensure the activities carried out on the property comply with the Development Standards stated herein and all applicable Weld County Regulations. 19. The Special Review area shall to limited to the plans shown herein and governed by the foregoing Standards and all applicable Weld County Regulations. Major changes from the plans or Development Standards as shown or stated shall require the approval of an amendment of the Permit by the Weld County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners before such changes from the plans or Development Standards are permitted. -Any -other changes shall be filed in the office of the Department of Planning Services. 20 . The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with all of the foregoing Development Standards. Noncompliance with any of the foregoing Development Standards may be season for revocation of the Permit by the Board of County Commissioners. 900222 HEARING CERTIFICATION DOCKET NO. 90-2 RE: SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND SPECIAL REVIEW _PERMIT FOR A GRAVEL MINING OPERATION IN THE AGRICULTURAL BONE DISTRICT - DANIEL AND MILDRED BUXMAN A public hearing was conducted on March 7, 1990, at 10:00 A.M., -with the following -present: Commissioner Gene R. Brantner, Chairman Commissioner George Kennedy, Pro-Tem Commissioner Constance L. Harbert Commissioner C.W. -Kirby Commissioner Gordon E. Lacy Also present: Acting Clerk to the Board, Mary Reiff Assistant County Attorney, Lee D. Morrison Planning Department representative, Rod Allison The following business was transacted: I hereby 'certify that pursuant to a notice -dated January 15, 1990, and duly published February 22, 1990, in The New News, -a public hearing vas conducted to consider the request of Daniel and Mildred -Rnxman for a Site Specific Development Plan and Spacial Review Permit for a gravel mining operation in the Agricultural Bone District. Lee Morrison, Assistant County Attorney, made this matter of record. Planning Department representative, Rod Allison, entered the favorable recommendation iof the _Planning Commission into the record and said the staff recommended the addition of a provision requiring the posting of a sign concerning the designated haul route to Development Standard #4. Vern Nelson, of Nelson Engineers, name forward to represent the applicants. -Re said the applicants had no -abjection to the Conditions and Development Standards recommended by the the Planning Commi-ssion or to the staff recommended amendment. No public _comment was offered concerning this request. Commissioner Lacy moved to approve this request for a Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit, based upon the Planning Commission's recommendation and subject ₹o the recommended Conditions and amended Development Standards. Commissioner Harbert seconded rthe -motion which carried unanimously. This Gertification was approved on the 12th day of March, 19-90. APPROVED: i,„ _BOARD OF _COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: � ��p� J WELD C NTY, COLORADO Weld County Cler-k and Recorder and _Clerk to the Boa//rd ene R. Brantne ,/Chairman BY_ /�7�I1z , r� l t vNv/ ' ' r ACS/ `.j7•� D putt' County Cle Geor e Kennedy, Pro-Tem Constance • C.W. Ki Gor o ac TAPE #90-15 DOCKET #90-2 PL0595 900222 A T T -E N D A N -C E RECORD PLEASE write or print legibly your name , address and the name of the applicant or Docket # for the hearing you are attending. TODAY' S HEARINGS ARE AS FOLLOWS: MARCH 7, 1990 DOCKET # 90-2 USR-GRAVEL MINING OPERATION IN THE AGRICULTURAL ZONE DISTRICT - DANIEL AND MILDRED BUXMAN DOCKET # 89-64 USR-GRAVEL MINING AND CONCRETE & ASPHALT BATCH PLANTS - C & M COMPANIES DOCKET 4 NAME ADDRESS HEAPING ATTENDING ( ivo1/41 mAki Ili\-tlu -,-5-a'( 81-if IN L . -to r It 1 ,J, Go�� ., (_ 131 .)- ", , N ‘( ,i)oo/4-f _ 651 ^GT v // n f't e/ /. 3s/r Ct��/a/(1,-). 6., Err elez. ,/ ff,t -65/ /- `" cbv ID A- eba-rit-ted'o G /, - 97-J-7 41— J I / ( /7 , (,'Cr .-,17( .))1; / 2 V r/ 3f, (fl it 6 y �L� C_' // „ -/- a - j. I - A'p/� c 5 ,- c' S AY !j �+—L t' C1-2— (i � 1 1�, � #11 Vii,_ �7 .�%: � , Gf'S c'- i 7 ` (A1/1/1 /0 o.� r� 7� " 5z 1 /I aii"v . ii_ rta-is..' 3 O `/ .9 v; C'- v /('Y r2 C/ . /�t(e 61' y?, y `rot 11°77-76ttrt.,- 8e-:1,0,- 1S:12- -g71 MA; ilpiitl?ith it.'iv tilt Rik. buuv�.j j4 11411-* r r /��; 0n.e i( r., /42/ 1e 7E 77- 41 l c-_ // 79/crt'.. / 2 7c-- lz'C,rid6V tizi its9-(1 Itti' LEC-.,-Nvv ) ,uwvtc.-� 3 cq 53 14-Q. n 2 7 ,b 81- 4 i/ Lorry Po'y7a) 'J.r, (J ( 5 .7.� - c4 Cii-pn', CK /r ,a. 1r//e / 3 6Ye i�.2c?. 6' Lc"e/,y � � ,/ /,in (1)�/ 4 ; / ; . '0 .9()II(A,h-;'rPe/p/ y<i<<,7( f9 ‘4 �A 4 "l71 c ln)rti / 3 �QA/ LI,C,. 6 / G :�1 n1O 11Y5'- 6Y i00754. _t,c L l / �Po A r .fjdg (*lict 520 , -V—O—gy ii)ti 0-1. J (kjckM1��/' 317`9 7 '<? l2 zg 9 (7 .ie e1�< <r11 3 i # 3 7- ‘y /NI(1/2/7✓ /1<, C7iUl6CG !� 1517 Vii , /cc'l(/fti//( 0 /ulckcitir r'44. (Ccer 'Ye-6u Gee H Y �vn ,n, �7G A Lei( /2/577 (a-et �.,/ 7- "ft/ L 900227 Q EXHIBIT yIINVENTORY CONTROL SHEET Case ("LW- 6L-AiblAirvi LtifIA_LH. ," t l i/ hire' Exhibit Submitted By Exhibit Description . A. C4CSi_ \1Ij#, Ce-Latt"LUj (} 6.YYM . 1.(,l b ;i : B. ��19Uu n f t? /M✓r1.la' v9 1E�(�lif nit) I 1-1.(171� i12L! ! 1 t o 9 , . c• , _,,,i,,,,,), „Thtin,,,,,,,„ ,Au-rotoh., 1\ o?) .,, ,i(tic,-,;u_c_42„ D. 0 L boa_ t• _t- i ,/ // 4spruts • o F. G. - H. I. J.. K. L. M. N. 0. 900222 PUBLIC NOTICE The Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, on March 7, 1990, conditionally approved a Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review Permit for the property and purpose described below. Conditional approval of this plan creates a vested property right pursuant to Article 68 of Title 24, C.R.S. , as amended, for a period of three years. APPLICANT: Daniel and Mildred Buxman 30598 Weld County Road 29 Greeley, Colorado 80634 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part SE} NW} and NE} SW} of Section 33, Township 6 North, Range 66 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado TYPE AND INTENSITY OF APPROVED USE: Gravel mining operation in the Agricultural Zone District SIZE OF PARCEL: 9.5 acres, more or less Failure to abide by the terms and conditions of approval will result in a forfeiture of the vested property right. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO BY: MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER AND CLERK TO THE BOARD BY: Mary Reiff, Deputy PUBLISHED: March 15, 1990, in The New News 900222 The t tv Conavirkwrs of Web County, Colorado, on March 7, I conditionally approved a Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review Permit d forrib e below.property Conditional approval of this plan creates c Bates a vested prso of rty Title 54,.C.R.St ,pursuant aame to �nded fora period of three years. APPLIBusmen+y�y96 Daniel o u County Road LEGAL eD'SSCCRIPPT0 80634 ION Part SE1/4 NWl/4 and NE1/4 SW1/4 of SeRange acn a 98Township t�of the 6th North, .M, Weld Cmn Colorado TYPE AND INTENSITY OF APPROVED SE: Gravel mining operation in the Agricultural Zone R Di ru ict SIZE OF PARCEL: 9.5 acres, more or less Failure to abide by the tern's and conditions ofMtglp?oval will result in a forfeiture of the vested property right OF COUNTY ONERS WELD BY: MAR RADO S ,l �Y1 Qua- . 9.,3222 o NOTICE Pursuant to the zoning laws of the State of Colorado and the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, a public hearing will be held in the Chambers of the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, First Floor, Greeley, Colorado, at the time specified. All persons in any manner interested in the Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit are requested to attend and may be heard. Should the applicant or any interested party desire the presence of a court reporter to make a record of the proceedings, in addition to the taped record which will be kept during the hearing, the Clerk to the Board's Office shall be advised in writing of such action at least five days prior to the hearing. The cost of engaging a court reporter shall be borne by the requesting party. BE IT ALSO KNOWN that the text and maps so certified by the Weld County Planning Commission may be examined in the office of the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners, located in the Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Third Floor, Greeley, Colorado. APPLICANT DOCKET NO. 90-2 Daniel and Mildred Buxman 30598 Weld County Road 29 Greeley, Colorado 80634 DATE: March 7, 1990 TIME: 10:00 A.M. REQUEST: Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit - Gravel mining operation in the Agricultural Zone District LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part SE} NW} and NEi SWi of Section 33, Township 6 North, Range 66 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: East of Weld County Road 29, approximately .5 miles south of "0" Street (Weld County Road 64) BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO BY: MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER AND CLERK TO THE BOARD BY: Shelly Miller, Deputy DATED: January 15, 1-990 PUBLISHED: February 22, 1990, in The New News 900222 cl 5 teacitt ;IIWII of the of caultY theepone �i 91b lattt, First Cea tem G % a IT �� d aM m4 oe cagt W a4y = taped �rIB the yBMMg action-atfive Mo oto the bearing. The rnR the. shag g in the office of ,:. to the Boadd lace: of •,,',� (:ao0eTh4a _ .NO. 003 / xlae w CtIntymuldit*dead • 10:0 A.IZ. pe rinidt te, U ie th ARamlfurai Zone Pa 7z 6-IAA-CO- t-<(— " "r «n P.R., � :'Fa pukeit set: qb ' styCamry earei,.-2.2- /..L ✓` -C,4_(2- 1- , (e- v!,=p BOARD Byr.i_y_., 6 , At. -•,,,,y,...... .,..,, ....,...ty 4' ed,,n,Ths News, ----7,- 9010222 i Arridavit of Publication STATE OF COLORADO ss. County of Weld, I, Lorita Seidler of said County of Weld, being duly sworn, say that I am an advertising clerk of THE GREELEY DAILYTRIBUNE, and THE GREELEY REPUBLICAN that the same is a daily newspaper of general circulation and printed and published in the City of Greeley, in said county and state; that the notice or advertisement, of which the annexed is a true copy, has been published in said daily newspaper for consecutive Pure i I s, sad s Weld the Way M(days) teen., that the notice was published in the County r, aldaeo, regular and entire issue of every number of said N pwspeslnan m ai Nect sPc � iinuasp�wbvNr.�irml we newspaper during the period and time of publication of atrono arld�Y heard. SMuld Yra alRiSRad or anti Mthe Prese a said notice, and in the newspaper proper and not in a .court reportertrmake amor0a ma ream( he do m:n�<NAtooteBoards supplement thereof; that the first publication of said O,me WWI" "µ alga in such adios ale� nw dm NM! tome "costal sawt was snw044 eYMP notice was contained in the issue of said newspaper reS taloWNaw the text sad mmlew certified yytMWeld bearing date CouNy or ict county Co mWbemiwd IsIM-aMbseliM qak C iM Bow di ,$Wtry R Stria Third odes,In the s county Twenty-first C.,aryilel oenYr,ftS iphBtne4 rnra/wPLICANT Cobrwo. 000KET NO.CO2 Oestrus SiSWnd Buxmens e2° day of February A.D. 19 90 TE, Mardi?1000and • Greeley,Cobrado athe last publication thereof; in the issue of said TIME: lO,00kA. newspaper bearing date the REQUEST:Sha"Spedlio Des me Plan and Special Perpd•Orml on in fora DMda LEGAL ppE� pN�Pert Witt a SE1 NW114 and NEtM SWIM a 8saLors T No d% Ranpa-Se We the alt P.M„Weld CoumY. East a Weld'Cou Rood EBMtpradnulahEInes day of February A.D. 19 90 rum co v mita ewRo Y �plc�NT4i ca ImssioNEos that said The Greeley Daily Tribune and The Greeley - wuNTMANC a�wn En Republican, has been published continuously and z AND CLERIC TO THE BOApRrDy •I_ia 3`idt ,, .4f °Trim, months next uring the period of at least six d months next prior to the first issue thereof contained PM ol_T �` said notice or advertisement above referred to;that said newspaper has been admitted to the United States mails as second-class matter under the provisions of the Act of March 3, 1879, or any amendments thereof; and that said newspaper is a daily newspaper duly_qualified for publishing legal notices and advertisements within the meaning of the laws of the State of Colorado. February 21 , 1990 Total Charge: $25.60 L.) n Advertising Clerk Subscribed and sworn to before me this 21st day of February A.D.. 19990 Z My commission expires 7- 7- T 9---4---.--c—ce i��`"°� Notary Public 9U)222 DATE: January 15, 1990 TO: The Board of County Commissioners Weld County, Colorado FROM: Clerk to the Board Office Commissioners: If you have no objections, we have tentatively set the following hearing for the 7th day of March, 1990 , at 10 : 00 A.M. Docket No. 90-2 - Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit for a gravel mining operation in the Agricultural Zone District - Daniel and Mildred Buxman OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD BY: /1_( C i j. / ) �c_(_(P.'_' Deputy The above mentioned hearing date and hearing time may be scheduled on the agenda as stated above. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WEL OUNTY, COLORADO CXi» ;T Z) :3 9u0222 Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission January 9, 1990 Page 2 The Chairman asked Mr. Leis if he had reviewed the recommendation of the Department of Planning Services? Be stated he has no objection to the staff's recommendation. MOTION: Jerry Kiefer moved Case Number S-309 for Frederick and Shirley M. Leis for a Site Specific Development Plan and a Resubdivision of part of Lot 3, in the SE} SE* of Section 9, T5N, R65W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado, as platted by the Union Colony of Colorado, be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with the Planning Commission's recommendation for approval based upon the recommendation of the Weld County Utilities Coordinating Advisory Committee and the Department of Planning Services' staff. Motion seconded by LeAnn Reid. The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Planning Commission. Discussion followed. The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Judy Yamaguchi - yes; LeAnn Reid - yes; Bud Halldorson - yes; Jerry Kiefer - yes; Ernie Ross - yes. Motion carried unanimously. CASE NUMBER: USR-900 APPLICANT: Daniel and Mildred Buxman REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a gravel mining operation in the A (Agricultural) zone district LEGAL DESCRIPTION. Part of the SE* SW} and NE} SWI of Section 33, T6N, R66W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: East of Weld County Road 29, approximately .5 miles south of Weld County Road 64. APPEARANCE: Vern Nelson, Engineer, Nelson Engineering, stated _this is a limited impact gravel mine, (under ten acres) with only about 7.7 acres that are mineable. This will be a private mine and the -owner intends to only sell gravel to people who come on-site to buy it. There will be no crushers or other commercial equipment. The estimated life of this gravel pit is approximately sixteen years. Reclamation plans include a recreational site upon completion of the mining operation. They have reviewed the recommendations, conditions, and Development Standards prepared by the staff. They are taking exception only to Development Standard #4. They would prefer it be amended not to say. . ."No hauling shall be allowed south on Weld County Road 29." The applicant can discouage this route by placement of ingress and egress points, signs, etc. , but this is a public road and the applicant has no policing powers. 300222 Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission January 9, 1990 Page 3 The Chairman called for disu-cssion from the members of the audience. Lillian Ikenoyue, resident, J-B Acres, spoke against using 71st Avenue (Weld County Road 29) for a haul route because it is a residential area, the road is not paved, and the dust is terrible. Tape 366 - Side 2 The Chairman asked Lanell Curry to read the recommendation of the Department of -Planning Services's staff into the record. MOTION: Bud Halldorson moved Case Number USR-900 for Daniel and Mildred Buxman for a Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a gravel mining operation_in the Agricultural zone district be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with the -Planning Commission's recommendation -for approval based upon the recommendation, conditions, and Development Standards presented by the staff and the testimony heard by the _Planning Commission. _Motion seconded by Judy Yamaguchi. The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Planning Commission. The proposed haul route was discussed. The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members -0f the Planning Commission for their decision. Judy Yamaguchi - yes; LeAnn Reid - yes; Bud Halldorsoz, - yes; Jerry Kiefer - yes; Ernie Ross - yes. Motion carried unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 2:25 p.m. Respectfully submitted, �oLL�s Ict Ion Bobbie Good Secretary 900222 BEFORE THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Moved by Bud Ha.11dorson. that the following resolution be introduced for passage by the Weld County Planning Commission. Be it Resolved by the Weld County Planning Commission that the application for: CASE NUMBER: USR-900 NAME: Daniel and Mildred Buxman ADDRESS: 30598 Weld County Road 29, Greeley, CO 80634 REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a gravel mining operation in the Agricultural zone district. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part SE} NW* and NEI SW} of Section 33, T6N, R66W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: East of Weld County Road 29, approximately .5 miles south of "0" Street (Weld County Road 64) be recommended favorably to the Board of County Commissioners for the following reasons: 1. The submitted materials are in compliance with the application requirements of Sections 24.7, 44.1, 44.2, and 44.3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 2. It is the opinion of the Planning Commission that the applicant has shown compliance with Section 24.3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: - This proposal is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan's Mineral Resource Goals and Policies, the Urban Growth Boundary Area Goals and Policies, and the Transportation Goals and Policies. The conditions of approval and development standards will ensure that these goals and policies are met. The comprehensive plan encourages the extraction of mineral resources when the mining plan promotes reasonable and orderly development of the mineral resources. - The proposal is consistent with the intent of the Agricultural zone district and is provided for as a use by special review. - Conditions of approval and development standards will ensure compatibility with the existing surrounding land uses. Surrounding land uses include agricultural production, pasture, the Cache La Poudre River, and rural residential home sites. c 900222 USR-900 Daniel and Mildred Buxman Page 2 The proposed use will not have an adverse affect on the existing and future development of the surrounding area as permitted by Weld County and the City of Greeley's Comprehensive plans. The City of Greeley Planning Commission has reviewed this proposal and recommended conditional approval. The conditions are addressed in the attached conditions of approval and development standards. The Special Review permit site is located in the 100 year flood plain. Special Review permit development standards address the overlay district requirements. No other overlay districts affect the site. Special Review Development Standards will provide adequate protection of the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood and County. This recommendation is based, in part, upon a review of the application submitted by the applicant, other relevant information regarding the request, and responses from referral entities. The Planning Commission's recommendation for approval is conditional upon the following: 1. The attached Development Standards for the Special Review permit shall be adopted and placed on the Special Review plat prior to recording the plat. The plat shall be delivered to the Department of Planning Services and be ready for recording in the Weld County Clerk and Recorder's office within 15 days of approval by the -Board of County Commissioners. 2. The Special Review activity shall not occur nor shall any building or electrical permits be issued on the property until the Special -Review plat is ready to be recorded in the office of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. 3. Prior to the special review permit activity occurring on the site, -evidence shall be submitted to the Department of Planning Services that: the Division of Water Resources has approved a well permit or other legal water supply for the mining operation; a 404 permit has been issued by the Army Corps of Engineers, if applicable; 900222 USR-900 Daniel and Mildred Suxman Page 3 - an emissions permit has been obtained from Air Pollution Control Division, Colorado Department of Health, for fugitive dust and odors, if required; and - the Use by Special Review activity will not cause injury to vested or conditional water rights as set forth in Section 44.4.11 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 4. Prior to recording the Special Review permit plat: an off-site road improvements and maintenance agreement shall be approved by the Toard of County Commissioners to mitigate impacts generated by the operation to County roads. A copy of the agreement shall be submitted to the Department of Planning Services; the Special Review Permit plat shall be amended to show a total of fifty feet right-of-way reservation from the centerline of Weld County Road 29; and the applicant shall amend the plat to show setback of the excavation boundaries to be in compliance with requirements of the Mined Land Reclamation Board. 5. The following note shall be placed on the Special Review permit plat: NOTE: The Mined Land Reclamation Board has the authority to issue permits for mining and reclamation activities. Activities related to miining and reclamation are, therefore, under the jurisdiction of the Mined Land Reclamation Board. However, -Weld County has jurisdiction of those matters -outlined in the Development Standards. Motion seconded by Judy Yamaguchi. VOTE: For Passage Against -Passage Judy Yamaguchi S,eAnn Reid Bud Halldorson Jerry Kiefer Ernie Ross 900229 USR-900 Daniel and Mildred Buxman Page -4 The Chairman declared the resolution }passed and ordered that a certified copy be forwarded with the file of this rase to the Board of County Commissioners for further proceedings. CERTIFICATION OF COPY I, Bobbie Good, Recording Secretary of the Weld County Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution i-s -a true copy of the Resolution of the Planning Commission of Weld County, Colorado, adopted on January 9, 1990, and recorded in Book No. )CII of the proceedings of the Planning Commission. Dated the 9th day of January, 1990. o ti. , ©od Bobbie Good Secretary 3 .0222 SITE -SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN SPECIAL REVI-;W _PERMIT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Daniel and Mildred Burman USR=900 1. The Site Specifi-c Development Plan and Special Review permit is for a gravel mining operation as submitted in the application material$ on file in the Department of Planning Services and -subject to the Development Standards stated hereon. 2. Approval of this plan may create a vested property right pursuant to Article 68 of Eitle 24 L.R.S. , as amended. 3. The gravel mining operation shall comply with Section -14.4 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. Any violation of these _regulations shall be grounds for enforcement of Section 44.6 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 4. The haul route for the mining operation shall be Weld County Road 29 (71st Avenue) _north to Weld County Road b4. No hauling shall be allowed south on Weld County -toad 29. 5. The property shall be maintained in compliance with the Weld County Flood -Hazard Overlay _District requirements. -6. The property shall be maintained in -compliance with Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, if applicable. 7. The mining activity shall -be -maint-ained in compliance with the requirements of the Oil and Las Conservati-on Commission. 8. Waste oil and other -associated liquid and solid wastes, shall he stored and removed for _final _disposal in a manner that protects against surface and groundwater contamination. 9. No permanent disposal of wastes shall be permitted at this site. 10. All waste materials shall be -handled, Stored, and disposed of in a manner that controls fugitive dust, _blowing -debris, -and _other potential nuisance conditions. 11. The Special Review permit site shall be maintained in compliance -with the _required emissions permit obtained from the Air Pollution Control Division, Color-ado Department of Health, for fugitive dust and odors. 12. Fugitive -dust shall be controlled _on this -site at all times. 13. The maximum permissible noise _level shall tot exceed the light industrial limit of 70 _dB(A) , as measured according to 25-12-102, Colorado -Revised Statutes. 900222 Development Standards OSR I900 Daniel and Mildred -Buxman Page 2 14. -An individual sewage disposal -system or a vault shall be used as the sewage disposal system for the site. The system or vault shall be installed according to the Weld County Individual Sewage Disposal Regulations. 15. All construction on the property -shall be in accordance with the requirements of the Weld County Building Code Ordinance. 16. The property owner or operator shall he responsible for complying with the Design Standards of Section 24.5 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 17. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Operation Standards of -Section 2-4.6 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 18. Personnel from the Weld County Health Department and Weld County Department of Planning -Services shall be granted access onto the property at any -reasonable time in order to ensure the activities carried out on the property comply with the Development Standards stated hereon and all applicable Weld County Regulations. 19. The Special Review area shall be limited to the plans shown hereon and governed by the foregoing -Standards and all applicable Weld County Regulations. Major _changes from the plans or Development Standards as shown or -stated -shall require the approval of an amendment of the Permit by the -Weld County -Planning Commission and the -Board of County Commissioners before such changes from the plans or Development Standards are permitted. any other _changes shall be filed in the office of the Department of Planning Services. 20. The property owner or operator shall -be responsible for complying with all of the foregoing Development Standards. Noncompliance with any of the foregoing Development -Standards may -be reason for _revocation of the Permit by the Board of County Commissioners. 900222 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS USR-900 Mildred and Daniel Buxman The Weld County Engineering Department in its referral response of December 11, 1989, has stated that the setback requirements of the Mined _Land Reclamation Division are 10O feet from highways and property lines and 200 feet from rivers. According to Gregg R. Squire, Mined Land Reclamation Division, the regulation states that the mining activity must be at least 200 feet from all permanent structures or roads. He stated this requirement regarding -setback from the road may be waived by Weld County. The regulation -does not apply to rivers. The appli-cant will be requir-ed to comply with the requirements of the Mined Land Reclamation Division. The City of Greeley has recommended that the noise level be limited to the residential limit of 55 dB(A) . It is the opinion of the Weld County -Health Department -that the residential limit is too restrictive for this activity in this location. 900222 INVENTORY OF ITEMS SUBMITTED FOR CONSIDERATION Case Number USR-900 Submitted -or Prepared Prior to Hearing At Hearing 1. Application 22 Pages X 2. One application plat(s) 2 page(s) X 3. DPS Referral Summary Sheet X 4. DPS Recommendation X 5. DPS Surrounding Property Owner's Mailing List X 6. DPS Mineral Owner's Mailing List X 7. Three DPS Maps Prepared by Planning Technician X 8. DPS Notice of Hearing X 9. DPS Case File Summary Sheet X 10. DPS Field Check X 11. December 29, 1989, referral from Weld County X Health Department 12. December 1-4, 1989, letter from Lowell-Paul X Dairy 13. December 15, 1989, letter from Loveland X Industries 14. December 27, 1989, letter from City of Greeley X 15. December 26, 1989, referral from Western Hills X Fire Protection District 16. January 4, 1990, referral from Jerry Kiefer X 17. December 20, 1989, referral from Colorado Water X Conservation Board 18. December 21, 1989, letter from Corps of X Engineers 19. December 13, 1989, letter from Division of X Water Resources 20. December 11, 1989, letter from Mined Land X Reclamation Board 21. December 11, 1989, letter from West Greeley X Soil District 22. December 13, 1989, letter from Oil and Gas X Conservation Commission 23. December 7, 1989, referral from North Weld X County Water District 24. December 11, 1989, and January 8, 1990, X referrals from Weld County Engineering 25. December 8, 1989, letter from West Greeley X Soil District 26. December 6, 1989, letter to applicant X 900222 USR-900 Page 2 I hereby certify that the 26 items identified therein were submitted to the Department of Planning Services at or prior to the scheduled Planning Commission hearing. I further certify that these items were forwarded to the Clerk to the Board's office on January 11, 1990. ` c r t P nner STATE OF COLORADO ) COUNTY OF WELD 'Trim SUBSCi1.4AMD SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS IC day of 4yy,_t_` 19<kp . • S$AIs,Y, NOTAR PUBLIC oa coV My Commission _Expires My Commission Expires Feb. 13, 1993 900222 Date: January 9, 1990 CASE NUMBER: USR-900 NAME: Daniel and Mildred Hinman ADDRESS: 30598 Weld County Road 29, Greeley, CO 60634 REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special -Review permit for a gravel mining operating in the Agricultural zone district. LEGAL DESC-RIPTION: -Part SE} NW* and NEl SW* of Section 33, T6N, R66W o£ the 6th Y.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: East of Weld County Road 29, approximately .5 -miles south -0f "0" -Street (Weld County -Road 64) THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES' STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THIS REQUEST BE APPROVED FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: 1. The submitted materials are in compliance with the application requirements of Sections 24.7, 44.1, 44.2, and 44.3 _of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 2. It is -the 'opinion of the Department of Planning _Services' staff that the applicant has shown compliance with Section 24.3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: - This -proposal is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan's Mineral Resouree Goals -and Policies, the _Urban Growth -Boundary Area Goals and _Policies, and the Transportation Goals and Polities. The conditions _of approval and development standards will ensure that these goals and policies are met. The comprehensive plan encourages the -extraction of mineral resources when the mining plan promotes reasonable and orderly _development 'f the mineral resources. - The proposal is consistent with -the intent of the Agricultural zone district and is provided for as -a use by special _review. - Conditions -of approval and development standards will ensure compatibility with the existing surrounding land uses. Surrounding land uses include agricultural production, pasture, the Cache La Poudre River, and _rural residential home sites. - The proposed use will not have an adverse affect _on the existing and future development of the surrounding area -as permitted by Weld County and the City -of Gr-eeley's Comprehensive plans. The City of Greeley Planning Commission has reviewed this proposal and recommended conditional approval. The conditions are addressed in the attached conditions of approval and -development standards. 900222 USR-90D Daniel and Mildred Sux man Page 2 - The Special Review permit sit-e is located in the 100 year flood plain. Special Review permit development standards address the 'overlay -district -requirements. No ether overlay districts affect the site. - Special Review Development Standards will provide adequate protection of the health, safety and -welfare of the neighborhood and County. This recommendation is based, in part, upon a -review of the application submitted by the applicant, ether relevant information regarding the request, and responses from referral entities. The Department of Planning Services' staff recommendation for approval is conditional upon the -following: 1. The attached Development Standards for the Special Revi-ew permit shall be adopted and placed 'on the Special -Review plat prior to recording the plat. The plat shall be -delivered to the Department of Planning Services and be ready for recording in the Weld County Clerk and 'Recorder's office -within 15 flays of approval by the board of County Commissioners. 2. The Special Review -activity -shall not occur nor shall any building or electrical permit-s be issued on the property until the Special -Review plat is ready -to be r-ecorded in the office of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. 3. -Prior to the special review permit activity occurring 'on the site, evidence shall be submitted to the J)epartment of Planning Services that: the Division of Water Resources has approved a well permit or other legal water supply for the mining -operation; a 404 permit has been issued by the Army Corps of -Engineers, if applicable; - an -emissions permit has teen obtai-ned from Air Pollution Control Division, Colorado Department of Health, for fugitive dust and odors, if -required; and - the use by Special Review activity will not cause injury to vested or _conditional water -rights as set forth in Section 44.4.11 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 960222 USR-900 Daniel and Mildred Buxman Page 3 4. Prior to recording the Special -Review permit plat: - an off site road improvements and maintenance agreement shall be approved by the Board of County Commissioners to mitigate impacts generated -by the operation to County roads. A copy -0f the agreement shall be submitted to the Department of Planning Services; - the Special -Review Permit plat shall be amended to show a total :f _fifty feet right-of-way reservation from the centerline of Weld County Road 29; and - the applicant shall amend the plat to show setback of the excavation boundaries to be in compliance with requirements of the Mined Land Reclamation Board. 5. The following note shall be places on the Special Review permit plat: NOTE: The Mined Land Reclamation Board has the authority to issue permits for mining and reclamation activities. Activities related to mining -and reclamation are, therefore, under the jurisdiction of the Mined Land -Reclamation Board. However, Weld County has jurisdiction of those matters outlined in the Development Standards. 9CO222 SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT DEVELOPMENT ST-ANDARDS Daniel and Mildred Burman USR-900 1. The Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review permit is for a gravel mining operation as -submitted in the application materials on file in -the Department _of Manning Services and subject to the Development Standards stated heraon. 2. Approval of this plan may create a vested property right pursuant to Article £8 of Title _24 C.R.S. , as amended. 3. The gravel mining operation shall comply with Section 44.4 of the Weld County -Zoning Ordinance. Any violation 9f these regulations shall -be grounds for enforcement of Section 44.6 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 4. The haul route for -the mining operation shall be Weld County _toad 29 (71-st Avenue) north to Weld County _toad 54. No hauling shall be allowed south -on Weld County_toad 29. 5. The property shall be maintained in compliance with the Weld County Flood Hazard Overlay District requirements. 6. The property -shall be -maintained in compliance -with Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, if applicable. 7. The mining activity shall be maintained in compliance with the requirements of the Oil and Gas Conservation Commission. 8. Waste oil -and other associated liquid and solid wastes, shall be stored and removed -for final _disposal in -a ?manner that protects against surface and groundwater contamination. 9. No -permanent _disposal of wastes shall be permitted at this site. 10. All waste materials -shall be handled, stored, and _disposed of in a manner that controls fugitive dust, blowing debris, and other -potential nuisance conditions. 11. The Special Review permit site shall be maintained in compliance with the required emissions permit obtained from the Air Pollution Control Division, Colorado Department _of Health, for fugitive dust and odors. 12. Fugitive dust shall be controlled on this site at all times. 13. The maximum permissible noise level shall not exceed the light industrial limit of 70 dB(A) , as measured according to 25-12-102, Colorado _Revised -Statutes. 900222 Development Standards USR-900 Daniel and Mildred $uxman Page 2 14. An individual sewage disposal system or a vault shall be used as the sewage -disposal system for the site. The system or vault shall be installed according to the Weld County individual Sewage Disposal Regulations. 15. All construction on the property shall be in accordance -with the requirements o₹ the Weld County -Building Code _Ordinance. 16. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Design Standards of Section 24.5 of the Weld -County Zoning Ordinance. 17. The property owner or operator shall be responsible .for complying with the Operation Standards of Section 24.6 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 18. Personnel from the Weld County Health Department and Weld County Department of Planning Services shall -Be granted access onto the property at any reasonable time in order to ensure the activities carried cut on the property comply with the Development Standards stated hereon -and all applicable Weld County Regulations. 19. The Special Review area shall be limited to the plans shown hereon and governed by the foregoing Standards and all applicable Weld County Regulations. Major changes from the plans or Development Standards as shown or stated shall require the approval o₹ an amendment of the Permit by the Weld County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners before such changes from the _plans or _Development _Standards are permitted. Any other changes shall be filed in the office of the Department o₹ Planning Services. 20. She property owner or operator shall be -responsibl-e for complying -with all of the foregoing Development Standards. Noncompliance with any of the foregoing Development Standards may be reason for revocation of" the Permit by the -Board of County Commissioners. 900222 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS USR-900 Mildred and Daniel Buxman The Weld County Engineering Department in its referral response of December 11, 1989, has stated that the setback requirements of the Mined Land -Reclamation Division are 100 feet from highways and property lines and 200 feet from rivers. According to Gregg R. Squire, Mined Land Reclamation Division, the regulation states that the reining activity must be at least 200 feet from all permanent structures or roads. He stated this requirement regarding setback from the road may be waived by Weld County. The regulation does not apply to rivers. The applicant will be required to comply with the requirements of the Mined Land Reclamation Division. The City of Greeley has recommended that the noise level be limited to the residential limit of 55 dB(A) . It is the opinion of the Weld County Health _Department that the residential limit is too restrictive for this activity in this location. 9&.0222 ici(!' timEmoRAnDum ine rb Weld County Planning December ' 1989 ei Date COLORADO From Environmental Protection Services WV - a Case Number: USR-1900 Name: Buxman, Daniel Subject: Environmental Protection Services has reviewed this proposal and recommends for approval, subject to the following conditions: 1. Waste oil, and other associated liquid and solid wastes, shall be stored and removed for final disposal in a manner that protects against surface and groundwater contamination. 2. Required Emissions _Permit is obtained from the Air Pollution Control Division, Colorado Department of Health for fugitive dust and odors. 3. No -permanent disposal of wastes shall be permitted at this site. 4. All waste materials shall 13e handled, stored, and disposed in a manner that controls fugitive dust, blowing debris, and other potential nuisance conditi-ons. 5. Fugitive dust must be controlled on this site at all times. 6. Maximum permissible noise level shall not exceed the industrial limit of 80db(A) , as measured -according to 25-12-102, Colorado Revised Statues. 7. An individual sewage -disposal system, or a vault, is required for the -proposed facility and shall be installed according to the Weld County Individual Sewage Disposal Regulati-ons. WP362/dgc 01-1C1s;)r1V//,�i ,IR' .4, 195u i ` _ i 300222 Lowell-Paul Yana ftaost 14332 Weld County Road 64 6reeley, Colorado 50_634 telephone: 353-0276 Dec-ember 1-4, 1-909 The City of Greeley Administrative Review Team Attention: tiregf1ebbe, Planner II Subject: Weld County Referral - Special Review Permit Project. Gravel Pit Applicant: Milbred and Danielf3uxman Locatien: East of WCR 29, and approximatelu 5 miles eouth of 0 Street Lowell-Paul Dairy, Inc. Is located just-north-of-the property on which the Buxmans are requesting the permit for the gravel pit. We have reviewed the impact that this pit would-have upon ourdairy. We do-not feel it will have anyel-gnificant nelgative impact on us. We do not oppose thisproject../ President 4 900222 L% 'OVELAND INDUSTRIES iNC. Special Products for Special Needs December 15 , 1989 All Administrative Review Team Members City of Greeley, Colorado 1000 Tenth Street Greeley, CO 80631 All Administrative Review Team Members : Loveland Industries forsees no problems with Mildred and Daniel Buxman ' s Gravel Pit . Loveland Industries forsees no problem with trafic or noise . Since‘ely, Ks Rogers Operations Manager KR/els P.O. Box 1289 • Greeley, Colorado 80632.1289 • (303) 356-8920-* Facsimile Line (303) 356-8926 900222 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Clty �l 1000 10TH STREET, GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 (303) 350-9780--%\ Greeley December 27, 1989 Lanell J. Curry, Current Planner Weld County Dept. of Planning 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80531 Dear Lanell: The Greeley Planning Commission, at its December 21, 1989 meeting reviewed the request for a Use by special Review for a gravel pit (USR-900--City I. D. # WCR 18 : 89) for property located east of Weld County Road 29 and approximately . 5 miles south of "O" Street. The Greeley Planning Commission recommended no objections to the Use by Special Review with the following conditions: 1. Fifty (50) feet of total right-of-way from the section line of Weld County Road 29 should be -dedicated. 2 . An outdoor residential noise standard of 55 dBa measured at twenty-five (25) feet from the property line should be established for the gravel operation. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this item. If you have any questions, please do no hesitate to contact our office. Sincerely, Stephen Hill, A. I.C.P. Planning Administrator LOPIL"Fc�.�4\tiq'FI 1989 � GREELEY JAN 2 1930 i tit ALL-AMERICA CITY / 900222 • tn, q DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE(303)356-4000,EXT.4400 1 915 10th STREET GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 O COLORADO• CASE NUMBER USA-900 December 6, 1989 TO WAOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from Mildred and Daniel Buxman for a Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a gravel mining operation in the A (Agricultural) zone district. The parcel of land is described as part cf the SE} NW} and the NE} SWI of Section 33, T6N, R66W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is east of Weld County Road 29, approximately .5 miles south of "O" Street. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation ycu consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by December 20, 1989, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Lanell J. Curry, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. C We do not have a Comprehensive P1-an, but we feel this request Y� (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: ^D n c. ri. •r) ! I o u3. ✓ We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our —_�+ interests. `l 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Please refer to the enclosed letter. I Agency: ltLi E,, F es. �I��i tee A, Date: C-2-2 —EIS 900222 o i 65 ii7Cv7 L .(AN 1990 U aid - CC, FIELD CHECK O GIY go.Filing ?wont L: ,/�7n Filing Number: USR-695 Date of Inspection: Applicant's Name: Mildred and Daniel Burman Request: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a gravel mining operation in the A (Agricultural) zone district Legal Description: Part of the SE} NW} and NE} SW} of Section 33, T6N, R66W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado Location: East of Weld County Road 29, approximately .5 miles south of "0" Street C'/ ^ �j - Land Use: N 4.44.../.....4"44;-A-4.- E JR i .A-GL - /�S i.-v-t, _. - .."...4--1Z---11-W 7/r/ 41A-c — ea. .07 Zoning: N A (Agricultural) E A (Agricultural) S A (Agricultural) W A (Agricultural) COMMENTS: Ate'+^/ ^--4-- 'v�`'"' 14-7. Love.— '-7 -C-et-te.-1-- 419,49 4 6 f.--get-5- ..--1--1.--t•-7;ed-rav-e--C. 'rig__ E ‘ Signature I Board Memb `'OO222 LAND-USE APPLICATION SUMMARY SHEET Date: January 2, 1990 CASE NUMBER: USR-900 NAME: Daniel and Mildred Buxman ADDRESS: 30598 Weld County Road 29, Greeley, CO 80634 REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a gravel mining operation in the A (Agricultural) zone district. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the SEI NW} and NEI SW} of Section 33, T6N, R66W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: East of Weld County road 29 (71st Avenue) , approximately .5 miles south of Weld County Road 64 ("0" Street) . SIZE OF PARCEL: 9.5 Acres, more or less POSSIBLE ISSUES SUMMARIZED FROM APPLICATION MATERIALS: The criteria for review of this proposal is listed in Section 24.3, 44.4, and 44.5 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. The Department of Planning Services' staff has received specific recommendations from the Division of water Resources, Mined Land Reclamation Board, West Greeley Soil Conservation District, Toil and Gas Conservation Commission, North Weld County Water District, Weld County Engineering Department, Colorado Water Conservation Board, and Army Corps of Engineers. Copies of these referral responses have been included in this summary packet. No objections have been received from surrounding property owners. 900222 •O. T7t�I ° p .. 3 .. = = \ :o al :x ;❑, xz [• 11 xo xi I • It'. •:1J\_Eufft: •U . , $. .. . UPI 'i,as ▪ '" : •4• • . •: c •, �ra •u f - - --_ x3• • 30° •4 max. • • a I • .. a • a zo • x cei— • .. k. SHEA • Sr RN: • rumen Fa IL Ar ~ r • 1xx H a ' 32 ...Miff . r 1�wy' L',I 1 ee a_ SEVLEP-4 f ro• re Q 7• . �., •_ k - • �• • • • 'it�p woo- I :. „" ..�"'_ •• • • • -in - Ii _ _._�� .+. :n • 1 . _. '-... ▪ S • :• I, 8 La 5$ T. a. 3•z! • ..3 <H•c ,.v: ..• .d • s,r--+F.� _ .-. zo Ca.!al VI: n. . q' • • • •.. ,a' .. •I, •• n.o • •• I • =. \ C• •'r•['�r•-•. • UCEPNE s - ;.o ; ' : • lV• •bA.. it '•M.E3• n • it • •: . at •j ax pp a r x. �• �• x' \: ._ • .�1 • 4 Lp•'1 14p. ->rL}-- • • •• ,• t - _ -•_ , N.mndn a S r : ••••• +r ... •y• et: w n x,0e<• • ( v•• SOU _ x• I ••• • z••• r x3 3O o.[n[.•' cIF • . �'• , • a ' •T-••., - I� TM�� \ `-, �1.1:L- I ;I [ a u 3a 2 • 3• n• 3 r r31 N r• �\ •,G•LCC A r .® n• • ... .. O la .. .. • .. rr-.RS - ••J EPf \.: • . ID w •••,i ` I r[...• .[.)i•. • 5•.7..'fin•} •..•: --3'}ru R:.....n • r e'I 58 ro der us.sr GP '• • ` o L - eI c----4 LA •' ....._. I .•_ 't 6r -e -� o.�; .Ln.n.wu • • • •s 1 co I •O] , \ • •o..i _ •I r' �.P [ t n w • •n 1 il . u • I 1y. T.5N • r — x I•, as •a•o .. •• • I I .o -•/;".1,5::: •y ° : V1713.1,r. . a z•� ; 54. . . . . '' o I t r .--- ;•' • ' I f 1 �V••N5 "• • '• ye. s . 1;• Gra•/a • :�• ' •0•5•C. 15,• - (I • ... .....: : r ', _2...T.-std. 9 I , M•N• , � Fins Correction 11x7 ''••Line an_• I• - --_ - '• - •3. • •�,\'ES1EP • ♦O ' , .,• t• ross�tE 4Y • • „p.N•$TWrN • • ••� T • • • ' ,Union. •�: AV. • • • , . - - •� �- R� .-ou 79a. ' UN/ON "'�'' — I• a . I'.yr-zw • 117'4'. . i• • , • I I• • • #•• • •�•• M!o a •.•••[r ^• • A ar I3 "' TF Ma LIMeN , !Gl/ // • I • •.:1-14‘-' • /_II •�'_ 2 owe /`•I: ru •y y•N, + • •• ..I.'•NCR • 1.---..--. • • • •\ • ' i ••• Ay3/2I, • • ' '-. ' u. "'" Orrcn J. 23 ' Era 3 • II • �•N•ro/ t• • • •I• `--NzNos�/��IyAQQIJJJ,�� • `T IfIi a ' • • • xo,� 1 ) l.. ' ww,,r 4• 14 . /. ..N•' • • :• f .Ij• • •p. • : -.: - - - /-\.'r — • •ix• I • • u •. 1Cp pQ /�`'�• •-� fl •• / _ R41.C .:4‘ • • •r e •[` �DS • xrI : • x• -• u I �L5 _.G/ •. ) • �[, `/ .M°h :4o •� f• C°;"r• C, . • • if G. • /1 \. 9 I 20 21 (,, .---••t. ' -' 23 4.4nJ \ v _. W 4160 il . 1 I i ta Gran fro q\ -4>90 — Sehw . »nr • •P ---114»5 � 0-- 8 _ IIil li � �tJT7: 1 ; ;7 �� ti, �\ �� Ion +u ) \ ��o>n. •� Weller 29 47261 •= en ` 2��.-,�.. �_ J _'° A e I Wel\° C_ A� ` Q il i \ c O ^ �� `OR4 0.p 1_ \ aoo •c '\\e° \at I I ')19 __i . ..o.. II • • O la o O / •• 4. ViO� 1,14]° j • 4694 SON 2-4,Y \ .\ n I. ER // 4580' \'. ll o � � 4J �( ( 32 / �' "88'r1 v. 1 34 L- � 35 i% \ ••\ !I / 'SSao . 4592 a\e DI( • -\ • � l - M 1(I s° l • ��--� A_ I l'4 •7 �� .I ^ 4�i9 • • .iit l .r` • iii i I4 9 I \\ 0 4.. ` 4t _ , ' I/ig 1 - “t1' •• ♦ r . 4 -- ' , 16 at re a' _ • - � .• -,48l3 j.. .��. BM- •`� �A� �� 4azJ p i •��JH• •61WP • i v. �r J r .�1 • . ..f ��Iy �. ' rep a mod_ �2pa. .1,yE ,4 ..,,,`. . ,, te a ¢x?•z, < , yR* y,.4, y .Y SAY `, �•� I��r °` ., a ''.tar§A '• - ``?F S,' .. �,�#�-:s.- ,-."'-‘14- > y. ' fP' — "~ =k .+. ` #,f dim �� ei; ,a .• as 4 � Y /€€bb�, xitr :. :x `T �`.� .emu 'era,� ds yyr lf'5a1 .�kR x nF 4M .� _ n c tc la.'�S'ti.,. x 1 :.I r ' i )' 4.4-4 4,, , •4 e 4^' i 13ba. :' "`v r h i,,, r 5 1 '+,. '• ifs �. .` y.ai 4- r dr., i ` ? t g{ , i r. • 1-- .a. + 4 A „ , t�� !♦ LL Diu i Mr ₹ '_ mid TTFq / 1, 1C" .. ititt i a S.. ' .'-0 R __ .441 Est (e '>MP a. u r, bbl. ' • '. ��r � •" '' `�. 3•!''` t A.Greeleytis ._ —, . L Cc l.; r. i�`� r, „ 0222 `` .. - 1 0-a0frit-- FIELD CHECK FILING NUMBER: USR-900 DATE OF INSPECTION: December 6, 1989 NAME: Mildred and Daniel Buxman REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a gravel mining operation in the A (Agricultural) zone district LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the SE} NW} and NE} SW} of Section 33, T6N, R66W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Approximately .50 miles south of Weld County Road 64, east of 71st Avenue LAND USE: N Dairy, farm residences E Cache La Poudre river, pasture S Cache La Poudre river, rural subdivision W 71st Avenue (Weld County Road 29) , C & M gravel pit (proposed) , and river bottom ZONING: N A (Agricultural) E A (Agricultural) S A (Agricultural) W A (Agricultural) COMMENTS: The Cache La Poudre river forms the south and east boundaries of this proposed site. Gravel has been mined, which is a violation of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. Access is from 71st Avenue, a gravel road. West of 71st Avenue is river bottom land, agricultural production, pasture, and is proposed to be mined for gravel by C & M Companies. A crew was preparing to remove the bridge at the river on 71st Avenue on the day of inspection. ,71--"4,4•19 791-4-A/t nenJ. Cud- Current Planner 900222 REFERRAL LIST NAME: Mildred and Daniel Buxman CASE NUMBER: USR-900 REFERRALS SENT: December 6, 1989 REFERRALS TO BE RECEIVED BY: December 20, 1989 COUNTY TOWNS and CITIES Attorney _Ault X Health Department _Brighton X Engineering _Evans _Garden City STATE _ Gilcrest y X Division of Water Resources Greeley Geological Survey _Grover _Department of Health _Hudson Highway Department _Johnstown X Division of Wildlife Keenesburg X Water Conservation Board _Kersey ,/ X Oil and Gas Conservation Commission La Salle �Lochbuie FIRE DISTRICTS Longmont Ault F-1 Mead _Berthoud F-2 _Milliken _Brighton F-3 New Raymer _Dacono F-19 _Nunn _Eaton F-4 _Platteville _Fort Lupton F-5 Severance Galeton F-6 Windsor ----HudsonF-7 Johnstown F-8 COUNTIES La Salle F-9 _Adams _Longmont F-10 Boulder _Milliken F-11 'Larimer Nunn F-12 Pawnee _Platteville F-13 FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES _Platte Valley F-14 v X US Army Corps of Engineers _Poudre Valley F-15 USDA-APHIS Veterinary Service Raymer _Federal Aviation Administration _Southeast Weld F-16 Federal Communication Commission _Windsor/Severance F-17 Wiggins F-18 X Western Hills F-20 SOIL CONSERVATION DISTRICTS _Brighton OTHER Fort Collins X Central Colo. Water Conservancy Dist. ✓ X Greeley ,i XNorth Weld County Water District Longmont 33247 Highway 85 Lucerne, CO 80646 X Associated Natural Gas, Inc. 1335 8th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 / X Mined Land Reclamation Board COMMISSION/BOARD MEMBER X Jerry Kiefer 900222 (la „ pTi_ ;-G 7-i YJ-�5 - - )i DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES ,r� I PHONE(303)356-4000,EXT.4400 - � 1 91510th STREET ---�' '1_ i5 GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 Ce to P :1:!:111£579: ti VI �� CASE NUMBER USR-9OO '' COLORADO DEC 0 7 '89 December 6, 1989 COL,3F _.;,j dniEP CONSERt/Annk, „r,:, TO WROM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from Mildred and Daniel Buxman for a Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a gravel mining operation in the A (Agricultural) zone district. The parcel of lend is described as part -of the SE} NW} and the NE} SW} of Section 33, T6N, R66W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is east of Weld County Read 29, approximately .5 miles south of "0" Street. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your -recommendation. Please reply by December 20, 1989, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Lanell J. Curry, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: 3. X., We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests./�cce( r,`5t per'ncc/j Je141fG Din Cr it;47 _ 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Signed: _ Agency: o YJ. (Fah Date:.1.2 -4 - 8-7 ___--------- 900222 ANT Op Qe '- i. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY p ;, M, OMAHA DISTRICT. CORPS OF ENGINEERS ic ROCKY MOUNTAIN AREA c _'3` b ro .d.'t,,e 2860 S. CIRCLE DR.. NORTH BLDG.. SUITE GL 10 ar"TE5°I1 COLORADO SPRINGS. COLORADO 00906.4180 REPLY TO ATTENTION OP December 21, 1989 Platte River Resident Office Lanell J. Curry Department of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Dear Ms. Curry: Reference is made to the proposed gravel mining operation by Daniel Buxman, — Case No. USR-900 located on the Taft bank of the Cache ya Poudre River in the SW Z of Section 33, T-6-N, R-66-W, Weld County, Colorado. During a December 18, 1989 site visit conducted by me, it was found that approximately 0.7 acres of wetland exist within the proposed mining area. See attached map showing approximate wetland area. Based on the information provided, this office has determined that the proposed work is authorized by the Department of the Army Nationwide Permit found at 33 CFR Part 330.5(a)(26). Enclosed is a fact sheet which fully describes this Nationwide Permit and lists the Special Conditions which must be adhered to for this authorization to remain valid. Although an Individual Department of the Army Permit will not be required for the project, this does not eliminate the requirement that other applicable Federal, State or Local Permits be obtained as required. Please note that deviations from the original plans and specifications of the project could require additional authorization from this office. Should at any time it becomes evident that either an endangered species or its critical habitat exist within the project area, this office must be immediately notified. The verification of this nationwide permit authorization is valid until December 21, 1991. When the gravel mining operation includes this portion of wetland, which is considered to be waters of the United States under the Corps of Engineers jurisdiction pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, the entire portion of the created lake will be considered waters of the United States. If a fill activity is required after the mining activity is abandoned and an ordinary high water mark is established, the Corps of Engineers should be contacted for proper Department of the Army permits. P DEC, 2 7 1989 1 �� + wem Cu. °,fart .1101Ar11i 9€0222 If there are any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to contact this office or me at 303/979-4120 or 4121 and reference Nationwide Permit Number CO-89-165. Sincerely, .Q cKoc cc: Terry McKee Permit Files Environmental Resource Specialist Omaha Permits Branch Colorado Department of Health U.S. Fish and Wildlife Environmental Protection Agency Colorado Division of Wildlife 900222 ZZ CFR Sc• t_oii E'•Juior;wido Permits (a) Ftuthori:cd l;ctiviti (2 6) Di sch arbors of drodaod or fill matori a:. into non-tidal rivers, streams . and thwir lakes and impoundments, includin_ a•i acrnt :•1otlands , l' 1 above h t_Yr r. hnon-tidal r Unitod _hat arm 1 GCut'ted �:t13G .G the headwaters;�, and other tlut!'rc of tho Lni _ed C'']t.atms including ad jrsc~nt �:1,;•I landG that are not .part o: a surface tributary system•t�o inters•. r1_ t .e.t. t•:�te or n Z ,i r[uL- waters c;• tho ��r.i ed States {i F� waters• A.:r p t r - o di�--. h r.•r_ which sLr�., ' loss o..• 1 isClra� d �. ors h.a•_c� 4.tct!"� .._ t•�l _ cause the Ga or substantial ad' rse mode- is txcn of 10 acres or more of WL!Ch waters rs or the Unitod Stc:tos. For ilischar' os which c tuso tho loss or substantial adv=•rso modification c•f 1 to 10 acrtes of such waters, inc?!_din !•!ot_ d- notification tho district �, � .tn not: ,.c.:• n to enciinoor is rcgt'ired in accordance with • Section. 7:0. 7. (b) Conditions: The following special condition,, whoro app1 _c._sb_o R:+_'.st IBc ccmpliod with for tho Nat_o^!•:id's Permit: authorization to romain valid: ( i ) That any di coha:rgo of dror'•cod or f411 material will not -- cc=:ur in the proximity of a public water supply int:ik . r- (2) That any discharoo of drodood or fill material will not occur in areas of conc_•ntrat:_•d r':hieil•f ih pro-':L!ci-on unInms the disr_h.:rgn is directly related to a ell•: _ _h hary 'ctinn activity authorized by 77 CFS' Part 77.0.5(a) (4) . (S) That tho activity will not jeapardico a t hr_at_•ned or anocrn species a identified rr n the Endangered Sp ci::`c Act (ESA) , or e d d p den' �=i ed nd r �!? c• e destroy or adversely modify the critical habitat o-F such cpecics. (4) That the activity oh t sdisrupt :II nG _cni�ict:ntl � the movement of those soon os of aquatic 1 i•f o i ndi menoul to tho t•:at rbody (unless the -primary purpose of tho fill is to impound water) . (5) That any dischar`is of dredood or fill material shall ccnn_ ;: of suitable material free from toxic pollutants (3t''• ' Section. `,0-t of the Clean Water Act) in toxic amounts. 6? That any structure for fill authorized shall be properly maintained. () That t tho activity v' t will -s • -r• a r h c. � , i l s-:�t. occur in component of the National Wild and Sconic River System; nor in a river officially designated by Conctross as a "otudy rivor" for posoiblo inclusion in the cysttho rivor!'" status. .:+: gem. while r r' .'.c in «:n official '.r•FLIt�`/ st '!"_'. (0) That tho activity _hall not rauso an unacc'_`ptable interforenco !•:ith na`:' : ation. • 900222 (9) That , i-f the activity may adversely affect historic properties which the National Park Service has listed on , or determined eligible -for listing on , the National Register of Historic Places, the permitter_ will notify the district engineer. Furthermore , that , if the permitter before or durinc prosecution c-f the work authorized , encounters a historic property that has not been listed or determined eligible for listing on the National Register , but which may be eligible for listing in the National Register , he shall immediately notify the district engineer. ( 10) That the construction or operation ion o-F the activity will not impair reserved tribal rights , includ .ng , but not limited to , reserved water rights and treaty fishing and hunting rights. 2,7 CFF: Section 7 !J. S Management Practices (a) In addition to the conditions specified above, the following management practices shall be followed , to the maximum extent practicable, in order to minimize the adverse effect o-f these discharges on the aquatic environment. Failure to comply with these practices may be cause for the district engineer to recommend , or the division engineer to take, discretionary authority to regulate the activity on an individual or regional basis pursuant to SS CFR _S^. 8. ( 1 ) Discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States shall be avoided or minimized through the use of other practical alternatives. (2) Discharges in spawning areas during apawning seasons shall be avoided. O Discharges shall not restrict or impede the movement of aquatic species indigenous to the waters or the passage of normal or expected high flows or cause the relocation of the water (unless the primary purpose of the fill is to impound waters) . (4) If the discharge creates an impoundment of water , adverse impacts on the aquatic system caused by the accelerated passage of water and/or the restriction o-f its -Flow shall be minimized. (5) Discharges in wetland areas shall be avoided . (S) Heavy equipment working in wetlands shall be placed on mats. (7) Discharges into breeding areas for migratory waterfowl shall be avoided. (S) All temporary fills shall be removed in their entirety. • • • • 960222 ____I WCR #64 't- ■ ■ KIELD COUNTY ASSESSORS PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NO. WELD COUNTY ASSESSORS ..---- ------- \ 080533000004 PARCEL IDENTIFICATION Na O \ L PAUL DAIRY, INC. 14332080533000086 3 /4332 WCR-,1'64 L OVELAND INDUSTRIES. INC. 7 GREELEY, C 0 8063/ PO BOX 1289 / GREf/EY CO RO �J�V�C' I_--- - — '5' WELD COUNTY—SSESSO % ?VELD COUNTY ASSESSORS PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NO O3 'ARCEL IDENTIFICATION NO 080533000049 CACHE- �J 080533000002 080533000050 = . . C4 Te ACKARD, PEGGY ANN 8 BUXMAN, DANIEL & J. LAWERENCE, TRUSTEES MILDRED L. / ' 179 S. MONROE ST \ 30598 WCR 29 K VER, CO 80209 s1 GREELEY. CO j}° it -- . WELD COUNTY ASSESSORS _ ��,� PARCEL /DEN 300& J�1N Na • CCt �I�� s DAVIS. WW/NDON K-3/4 INT. 8 �S DAVIS, DAV/S,BETSY-I/4 /NT. _. GREELEY CO 8063/ I . WELD COUNTY ASSESSO PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NO. WELD COUNTY ASSESSO S 080533300030 PARCEL INDENT/FICA T/ON a ORR EDP SUSIE ANN • 080533300025 i CC 80/8lh ST SUITE 230 DURAN, R/NE GREELEY, CO 8063/ 760 N 7/sl AVE St GREELEY, CO 8063/ • �_ 0/74., ./ 4.----N........._ ■ • ■ ■ • ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ • • ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ NOTES ■ • ■ ■ T6N _ I. ALL E T5N APPR e R66W=C:::- • 2. TOPS TO /2' ES TIN VICINITY MAP 3. TOPS SCALE: / 60 REAPr ID VI- L n N S> /NACr alaa AT/ON' ��Aln ci^C Cn// C/ d ss/F/GA T/ON FOR S app•t.x .1 LtCY. j5 900222 0c•COto T ee ROY ROMER h JERIS A. DANIELSON Governor } pro,� �,, State Engineer /876> OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 1313 Sherman Street-Room 818 Denver, Colorado 80203 (303) 866-3581 December 13, 1989 Ms. Lanell J. Curry Weld County Planning Department 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Re: Buxman Site Plan, USR-900 SE1/4 NW1/4 & NE1/4 SW1/4, Section 33, T6N, R66W Dear Ms. Curry: We have reviewed the above referenced proposal to operate a gravel mining operation on a 9.6 acre tract. Two ground water lakes will be created in the operation. The mining will not involve dewatering. Unfortunately, no well permit has been obtained from this office for the ground water lakes as per Section 37-90-137 (II) (a) (I) , C.R.S. (1973) (1989 Supp.) of the Colorado Revised Statutes. We cannot recommend approval of this proposal until the well permit has been obtained. We could not issue a well permit without an augmentation plan approved in Water Court or a substitute water supply plan approved by the State Engineer because the proposed well (ground water lake) is located in an over-appropriated basin, . The statute (Section 37-90-137 (II) (e) (II) , C.R.S. (1973) (1989 Supp. )) also imposes a fee to be collected with the plan for augmentation or plan of substitute supply. Sincerely, gcvntlaWlide# James R. Hall , P.E. Supervising Water Resources Engineer JRH/JCM/clf:6960I cc: Bruce DeBrine ' DEC 1 8 1989 Ito 900222 STATE OF COLORADO . . Roy Romer, Governor *1876 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION FRED R. BANTA, Director 7� County, City, and Town Zoning MEMORANDUM DATE: December 11 , 1989 TO: Weld County Planning Department Box 758 915 10th St Greeley, CO 80632 FROM: Gregg R. Squire, Reclamation Specialist !.,;,_,. Please be informed that Mr. Daniel Buxton has filed with our office an application to conduct surface mining and reclamation at or near Section 33.0, Township 6.0 N, Range 66.0 W, 06th Prime Meridian. The applicant proposes to reclaim the site for recreation use. The applicant is required to place a copy of the application for public inspection with the Clerk of the county in which the proposed mine is situated. This is intended to provide the application for public review and comment. Please note that it is not intended to be made a part of public record by recording. The Board is tentatively scheduled to consider this application on January 10, 1990. If you have any questions, please contact me. 5536G D 0(615116:1 gil DEC 181969 field Co. Man 69"" 215 Centennial Building, 1313 Sherman Street Denver, Colorado 80203-2273 Tel.(303) 866.3567 %0222 UNITED STATES 4302 West 9th Street Road DEPARTMENT OF Soil Conservation Service Greeley , Colorado 80634 AGRICULTURE Greeley Field Office ( 303) 356-6506 December 11 , 1989 Milton Baumgartner , Pres . West Greeley Soil Conservation District 4302 W. 9th St . Rd . Greeley , CO 80634 Weld County Case Number : USR-900 Dear Mr . Baumgartner : I have reviewed the Weld County Planning Service referral Mildred and Daniel Fuxman for a Site Specific development Plan and a Special Review permit for a gravel mining operation in the A (Agricultural ) zone district . The parcel of land is described as part of the SE 1 /4 NW 1 /4 and the NE 1 /4 SW 1 /4 of Section 33 , T6N, R66W, Weld County , Colorado , five miles south of 0 street . The request is for a 9 . 6 acre openpit gravel mine operation . Reclamation will consist of bank sloping and revegetating shore line around the pond area . Deb Sherman has prepared vegetative inventories and seeding recommendations , which have been sent to Nelson Engineers . Their write-up indicates that they will follow our recommendations and procedures . I saw no conflicts with the district interests . I recommend approval without comments . y , Ronald 0 . Miller District Conservationist Greeley Field Office R0M/gg ui Li! , . . L ,.. . - .r J• 900222 STATE OF COLORADO OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES SUITE 380 LOGAN TOWER BUILDING WILLIAM R. SMITH 1580 LOGAN STREET Director DENVER, COLORADO 80203 DENNIS R. BICKNELL ROY ROMER Deputy Director (303) 894-21-00 Governor December 13 , 1989 Keith Schuett Department of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Re: Application for Gravel Mine Case # USR-900 Sec 33-6N-66W This letter is in r-egard to your request to review and comment on the Buxman Site Specific Development Plan for a gravel mining operation. 1 have reviewed the application and do not find any conflicts with the plans presented. There are three wells in the area that should not effect the gravel operation. The wells are: Lowell-Paul Dairy 2-23 , NENW 33-6N-66W; Buxman 1-33 , NWNE 33-6N-66W Davis 2-33 , SWSE 33-6N-66W Future drilling in this area, should it occur , will have to comply with our safety rules, specifically: Rule 603 (a) Wells shall be located a distance of 150 feet or one and one-half times the derrick, whichever is greater, from any occupied building, public road, or major above ground utility line _or railroad. Rule 604 (a) (3) Tanks shall be a minimum of 200 feet from the residences, normally occupied buildings, or well defined normally occupied outside area. Rule 604 (b) (5) Fired vessel, heater treater , shall be a minimum of 200 feet from residences, occupied buildings, or well defined normally occupied outside area. If I can be of any further assistance I may be reached at 894-2100 . Yours truly, ----- Stephan Pott ( O ( 4199 Sr. Engineer v` - 1x131® CG. ?In1;.iiar Almau 900222 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE(303)356-4000,EXT.4400 iiii(Nt ''p 915 10th STREET GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 viice CASE NUMBER USR-900 COLORADO December 6, 1989 TO WROM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from Mildred and Daniel Burman for a Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a gravel mining operation in the A (Agricultural) zone district. The parcel of land is described as part cf the SE} NW} and the NE} SW} of Section 33, T6N, R66W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is east of Weld County Read 29, approximately .5 miles south of "0" Street. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation ycu consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by December 20, 1989, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Lanell J. Curry, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. C - - -�� + (n 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our to 4 ,�I town for the following reasons: F `73I 2 co.o vl g \ 3. x We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our It 7) interests. J 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Pl se ref to the enclosed letter. Signed: ,. Agency: /thterW apal,/!}'T,-t,c� L)LS/ Date: /-//d�I 900222 itst„,,60 mEmoRAnDum Lanell Curry, Planning December 11, 1989 To Date Drew Scheltinga, County Engineer COLORADO From Buxman Gravel Pit, USR-900 subject: On Exhibit "E", the reclamation plan map, Section AA indicates excavation is to be within 10 feet of the east right-of-way line of Weld County Road 29. Although there is no dimension given, Section BB on the same map indicates excavation will be very close to the north bank of the Cache La Poudre River. The setback requirements by the Mined Land Reclamation Division are 100 feet from highways and property lines, and 200 feet from rivers. The application materials state there will be no impact on Weld County Road 29. The applicant may intend a small-scale operation, but once the permit is issued, there is nothing to preclude all the material being removed at once. Therefore, I recommend the applicant enter into a Road Improvements and Maintenance Agreement with the Board of Weld County Commissioners. The haul route should be restricted to Weld County Road 29 to the north, because of poor alignment to the south. tCPl 1 2v 1969 :flit DOE. ajuuN, �;jmv:gr, big Cu. j'lauaja�; wouwiiLik DLS/mw:prbuxman cc: Commissioner Lacy Planning Referral File - Buxman Gravel Pit, USR-900 200222 RECEIVED = - _ i UNITED STATES 4302 West 9th Street Road DEPARTMENT OF Soil Conservation Service Greeley, Colorado 80634 AGRICULTURE Greeley Field Office • (303) 356-6506 December 8, 1959 Arthur F. Uhrich ch Nelson Engineers 822 7th Street . Greeley, CO 80631 Dear- Mr . Uhr i chr : Enclosed is the information ''y': a requested regarding the proposed mining operation in Section 33, T6N, Rr6N. The so i I s information is from the Si:' i t Burvey of Weld County, Southern Part . Following are answers to your questipans . I . Si:' i l s information is given on the pages copied from the Sc' i I survey. Z.. Seeding information is given on the enclosed seeding recommendations which specify species , dates and rates . 3. The type and amount of fertilizer will depend upon the requirements of the Sc' i I at the time of seeding and can be determined by so i I tests at that time. 4. Trees and shrubs are highly recommended for wildlife habitat improvement and the suggested species are given in the seeding recommendations . The location , sizes , and numbers will depend upon the final reclamation contours and objectives . 5. It is assumed that the areas to be reclaimed will include shorelines around the inundated pit as well as unmined areas above the pit . It is recommended that topsoil be salvaged for use irr reclamation . It is assumed that the final slopes will be given on the reclamation map and wi I I range from 3: 1 to 5: 1 . 6. The proposed mine site is located along the Cache La Poudre River and is subject to flooding . Obviously, the groundwater table is quite high and thus reclamation will have to address post-mining contours relative to the groundwater- table . If you have any further questions , please let us know. incerely, Debrah Sherman Range Conservationist Greeley Field Office enclosure 900222 Form CO-ECS-5 ( Computer Draft ) PRODUCER: Daniel Bu>man GRASS SEEDING RATE CALCULATIONS PLANNER: Sherman FOR RECLAMATION DATE: 12/5/89 PART I : SEEDING PLANNED CONTRACT OR AGREEMENT #: none Location :SE 4 NW 4 33-6-66 MLRA: G67 Acres: 1 . 0 I laterials:Salvaged topsoil Pract. No. : 342 Final grade:3: 1 to 5 : 1 Pract. Name: Reclamation seeding Site:Shoreline COVER CROP: GRASS SEEDING: Tillage dates May-June Planting dates:Nov 1 - APR 30 Plant dates: June-July . Methad: interseed into Seedbed: firm, weedfree cover crop Cover crop: forage sorghum or other Drill type: Grass suitable cover crop Planting depth : 1/2 - 1 inch Drill spacing: 7-12 inches FERTILIZER: WEED CONTROL: ( lbs/ac. actual , available) Dates:May-June Nitrogen : per soil tests Mowing :as needed Phosphate: per soil tests Chemical :ass needed Potassium: per soil tests Type and Amount: as needed and at appropriate times at correct rates **MULCH: Find- weedfree native hay Amount- two tons/ac How applied- spread uniformly How anchored-crimped Anchor depth-four inches into soil **(mulch may be substituted for cover crop) SEEDING PLANNED: ( 1 ) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) PLANT PLANT PLS/ACRE 7 OF PLS RATE PLANNED TOTAL PLS VARIETY SPECIES a 1000/ MIXTURE PER ACRE ACRES REQUIRED Palaton Reed canarygrass 3. 5 45 1 . 58 1 . 0 1 . 6 Native Prairie cordgrass 4. 5 20 0.90 1 . 0 0. 9 Revenue Slender wheatgrass 11 .0 10 1 . 10 1.0 1 . 1 Native Canada wildrye 11. 0 25 2. 75 1 . 0 _...8 100 6. 33 6.4 REMARKS: The total pounds PLS is for one acre only. This mix is intended for use along shorelines and other areas frequently inundated. Tree7> and shrubs should also be planted for benefit to wildlife. Willow Cottonwood, Snowberry, Chokecherry, American plum, and Wi ].d licorice may he used. ***-if******..************x**if*******T;•i ***'#'*'.!*?***fir#:+F******•:•tiE-3!**-It*********** 900222 Fnrm CO-ECS-5 ( Computer Dra t) PRODULER: Daniel Buxman GRASS SEEDING RATE CALCULATIONS PLANNER: Sherman FOR RECLAMATION DATE: 12/5/89 PART I : SEEDING -PLANNED CONTRACT OR AGREEMENT #: none Location :SE 4 NW 4 33-6-66 MLRA: G67 Acres: 1 . 0 Materials:Salvaged topsoil Pract. No. : 342 Final -grade:3: 1 to 5: 1 Pract. Name: Reclamation seeding Site:Upland COVER CROP: GRASS SEEDING: Tillage dates May-June Planting dates:Nov 1 - APR 30 Plant dates: June-July Method: interseed into Seedbed: ' firm, weedfree cover crop Cover crop: forage sorghum or other Drill type Grass suitable cover crop Planting depth: 1/2 - 1 inch Drill spacing : 7-12 inches FERTILIZER: WEED CONTROL: ( lbs/ac. actual , available) Dates:May-June Nitrogen : per soil tests Mowi.ng :as needed Phosphate: per soil tests Chemical :a.s needed Potassium: per soil tests Type and Amount: as needed and at appropriate times at correct rates MULCH** Kind- weedfree native hay Amount- two tons/ac How applied- spread uniformly How anchored-crimped Anchor depth-four inches into soil **(mulch may be substituted for cover crop) SEEDING PLANNED: ( 1 ) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) PLANT PLANT PLS/ACRE OF PLS RATE PLANNED TOTAL PLS VARIETY SPECIES 3 1007. MIXTURE PER ACRE ACRES REQUIRED Blackwell Switchgrass 4.5 25 1. 13 1 .0 1 . 1 Sodar Streambank whee.tgras 11. 0 10 1. 10 1. 0 1 . 1 Arriba Western wheatgrass 16. 0 25 4. 00 1 . 0 4. 0 Vaughn Sideoats grama 9.0 10 0. 90 1. 0 0. 9 Native Big bluestem 11 .0 15 1 . 65 1 . 0 1 . 7 Llano Yellow indiangr-a.ss 10.0 15 1 .50 1. 0 2. 8 100 10. 29 11 .6 REMARKS: The total pounds PLS is for one acre only. This mix is intended for use on upland areas which are not frequently inundated. Trees and shrubs should also -be planted for benefit to wildlife. Willow Cottonwood, Snowberry, Chokecherry, American plum, and Wild licorice may be used. **367F**`If' ₹ x'3f '.#-'k ) ******?h*. .. .. .******* .*****.*****.x******.******.r. .*.R.****.******* 900222 �- :T -r-�..wn�v l^'!^5 'ijl �",5A7 1,11[ • ,,> r -...,tom "'-'7:;7': -,-.-• "'1'-: iY .S� . 3—lie)),�� .J'4"t�f.• ' •�...q x:Y 4/.J r re'J`R:, (II leey�* 11 .s. 1ri • 1 r�� t' to 1 it Y ar 6 ThcM �1+ 1;1YIdd t j . '. • '-. -4 rat,;„— ,v it w �'.-1. `uY <r a ti • n '.:•-• ` fJ ` �•°s? 1 • •• p \--• m'Y < ti•I.I• dC'.+x") ��{r ti) ° n lf a.� >•ys �iK.' ' i FJi... N b•_ 1.•tA ry A; t x •-r15 F 1 °N M• 14 m :'�•, ;'(;L � rX� , � m..•t u}4, l A ;.1•. ,K. W Ca le; a°, Its '" k `4 Y• '^ 5 n e .0 t $ Jv,: fry ; i Nd,^ti"''j^�cY'• t o .. ty .i� i�, �d.. a t i r o " ie v4�..i1`n ry.i+. y tg V-4-4.�� r, �, jhV i t Mfk li #. 1r }I....._ N m i i.1 t !l _ ,t--4-L ' :q: /i� y N •"� r - n 4l •� ... O N • ,R^t. M'ra 11§4-l„Y O t�l`� • r 404,,,,.:. _i1/L f Y t e. r f rr xv- N U O f b t 7, 1'OO4.r 1,V44 a" 1'' r x Z r8 F 1 h 4 1t.1. Ir 1FTx 3tnb\vr'•S r O yi rpn 113-r • _ � � ` , 1 < o f y 7�;. '. ` kit• . ¢ .�co U n �xy. x.. ' I ,N . 6. •.t !.zero r. Titliv i "` ., l i h :h Q o to .} G; i1 c li'VIiWc,i yl . , .. U ' Sys >, 4 -� oe/ 3_P t l f,,,,u<" 1. '" �1 m i hrh"N• F"•§ {{Y,, �rtY}pE�i x .,.< '.'� - n wk3r ' µ� .. '� rfi'''•/M ' a f v Y49 J i V kA# n ' ..9,1t:•-' y9 4e .V.. ) 1 3. .. }'r41"t 11 JJ a�7,r�, n r17 �{tuh-f•. " pJFY�1ut 3 hl + r41,1." ee � tbi'4 ?. 1. k'. '� • 3 ,' z Sf• 4.4.-4...44:- ri • o ' . -1 Ito r a x -W f • x N i •" tu 11 �''•1 1 �. 1 '�i F• �ii1 rrT N p, IF*. °�a J 1 -!G -34 cc n v .- I J co cri Ik • F `O ₹es, i IS • n • H.M. . r 1�. ; tp.IN sl _ t ,.t e'm ,'t fi.: e h ¢ p r u l oli a I...A r,'")../ to izik IT'..adM,iWeL(F 1 '� 9 n .: m T 7 .. a� a _ b b V e;n,x;,'y�L �'.R b;' m O C e e a xA k f t. y i • in �y.,'4 u O i fS ��.j d 1,-F ',fir` Qp�, a ^'- , ; O V ca .rvtl'a �" aaa �11 'M.%Jtra�� .sfl b N 'a�'•,. r— .bc > '^ , r 4 sa,ee mty°• i 1 -,,,,.�e•:,Yi q 1�` Y 1 .fd , .y xi »'°^' VW. 4 rX�~ ti >., _1Yl'.ASS F 1 1 y� '� � 4 p� PCS r ' - '�, - g ]m ty /Th\JN\t?• my q' 44' l0 m cn r °• 7 n i Icy - r ,, '1 �'1.4. �°f i1 :. IJtw • MELD COUNTY S(WTII FART _527 , ) OFFICE HIGHLY ERODICtE SOILS LISTING MAY 21,1%7 TENTATIVE MATERIAL SUBJECT TO CHANGE musym comp;ame clack Hart [WI vndbel rfact ktact Liiack vithel 1 ALTVAN 0.2 56 11.2 1 50 0.2; .1 3 2 ALTVAN 0.3 56 11.2 I CO 0.20 . 4 3 Q A1tKtLS • 0.8 84 13.76 1 50 0.24 5 3 3 iaENTS 0.3 • 06 13.76 1 50 0.24 5 3 4 MILLS 0.3 0 0 0 50 C io 4 AQUEPTS 0.3 0 0 0 50 5 0 5 ASCALON 0.3 26 13.76 I 50 0.17 5 3 6 ASCALON 0.8 84 13.76 I 50 0.17 5 T ASCALCFI 0.3 36 13.76 I 50 0.17 5 3 2 ASCALON 0.3 56 3.96 1 50 0.20 5 A5CALCtl1 0.3 56 2.96 1 50 0.23 5 0 10 BANKARD 0.3 36 13.76 1 50 0.17 5 3 . II U ESSIR 0.3 E6 13.76 1 50 0.17 5 3 12 1F&SSER 0.3 36 13.76 1 50 0.17 5 3 13 CASCAJU 0.3 • 0 0 0 t II CULBY 41 0.17 5 2 0.3 86 13.76 1 50 0.43 5 15 COLBY 0.2 86 13.76 1 50 0.43 ' 5 16 COLBY 3 3 0.3 zu' 13.76 1 50 0.43 5 3 SILL CLASSES:17 CC4l:Y 0.3 86 13.76 1 l3 G(tD'f 0.3 36 13.76 CO 0.43 5 3 I = IIi3Riy erodible 1 0.43 c 3 18 ADEHA 0.3 56 8.96 . 1 50 0.43 5 3 3 = Notemtiaily ridibl erodible 19 CMtOFICU 0.3 t6 2.96 1 50 0.23 5 3 3 = Not Li3Lly er .J-U 20 COLC44C13 0.3 56 8.96 I 50 0.23 5 3 = 1iuf hlihbl ¢rzJi{.Ic. 21 DAC4IJ 0.3 43 12.3 1 50 0.24 3 3 • 2> DAM 0.3 43 12.3 I. 50 0.24 3 23 FORT COLLINS 0.3 48 7.62 0 50 0.24- 5 - 3 24 FCRt COLLINS 0.3 43 7.63 0 50 0.24 ' 5 3 25 HAVERSON 0.3 86 13.76 1 50 0.24 5 26 HAVERSON 0.8 06 13.76 1 50 0.24 5 3 27 HELOT 0.3 36 13.76 1 50 0.23 5 • 23 HELD! 0.3 36 13.76 I 50 0.23 5 3 29 JULESEWRG 0.3 36 13.76 I 50 0.24 5 30 JItESLWHG 0.3 86 13.76 1 50 0.24 5 3 0 31 KIM .•' 3 L a :.6 13.76 1 50 0.02 5 3 32 KIN 0.8 36 13.76 1 50 0.32 5 3 33 KIN 0,2 36 13.76 I 50 0.32 5 3 34 KIM 0.2 36 13.74 1 50 0.32 5 3 ;5 Licit 0.3 134 21.4.4 1 50 0.17 5 3 35 EL 0.3 134 21.44 I 50 0.17 5 L 3 36 MIDWAY. 6: U.'3 86 ..<.,, • 1 50 0.43 1 1 36 SHltaE 0.3 56 22.4 1 50 0.32 - 37 NELSON 0.8 36 34.4 1 50 0.2 2 3 w3 NELSON 0.8 36 04.4 1 50 0.2 2 2 :ii 1414411 0.3 43 7.68 0 50 0.2.1 ' 5 40 IAUNN 0.3 48 7.63 0 50 0.24 5 41 NUNN 0.8 43 7.62 0 50 0.32 5 42 taA4 0.3 43 7.62 0 50 0.32 5 3 43 NUNN VARIANT 0.3 366 13.76 1 50 0.17 5 44 t4J4EY 0.8 134 21.44 1 50 0.15 5 45 OLr1EY 0.3 134 21.44 1 50 (1.15 46 CLNEY 0.3 06 13.76 1 50 0.2 5 3 47 OLN4EY3 tl•3 26 13.76 1 50 0.2 5 3 48 01.14r, 0.3 36 13.76 I 50 5 0.2 a 3 49 Cci0D)0 0,3 310 49.6 1 50 0.1 5• 3 50 UTERnO 0„, 36 13.76 I 50 0.2 9t02220222 -tit OTCnIi— 0.3 3s 13.76 1 50 0,2 °�Ir rr it 3 86 13.76• I CO 0.2 Sj •i•.a—./fFR{a ' Cs.8 26 i 8 SOIL SURVEY filter the leachate. Sewage lagoons require sealing. GO percent of the unit. Aquents, which have a lighter Lawns, shrubs, and trees grow well. Capability subclass colored surface layer, make up about 35 percent. About 5 Its irrigated. percent is Aquepts and Banyard sandy loam. 2—Altvan loam, I to 3 percent slopes. This is a deep, These are deep, poorly drained soils that formed in well drained soil on terraces at elevations of 4,500 to 4,900 recent alluvium. No one pedon is typical. Commonly the feet. It formed in old alluvium deposited by the major soils have a mottled, mildly alkaline to moderately al- rivers. Included in mapping are small areas of soils that kaline loamy or clayey surface layer and underlying show evidence of poor drainage. Also included are small, material and are underlain by sand or sand and gravel long and narrow areas of sand and gravel deposits. within 48 inches. In places they have a gleyed layer in the Typically the surface layer of this Altvan soil is grayish underlying material. brown loam about 10 inches thick. The subsoil is brown Most of the acreage is subject to flooding. The water and light yellowish brown clay loam and sandy clay loam table is at or near the surface early in spring and recedes about 14 inches thick. The substratum is calcareous loamy to as deep as 48 inches late in fall in-some years. sand about 5 inches thick over gravelly sand. These soils are used for rangeland and wildlife habitat. Permeability and available water capacity are Same small areas have been reclaimed by major drainage moderate. The effective rooting depth is 20 to 40 inches. and leveling and are used for irrigated crops. Surface runoff is medium, and the erosion hazard is low. This soil is used almost_entirely for irrigated crops. It The potential native andvegetation is dominated byal alkali is suited to all_crops commonly grown in the area, includ- ge, rush,sw andasal western wheatgrass.alsos. Saltgrass, ing corn, sugar beets, beans, alfalfa, small sedge, and alkali bluegrass are also prominent. grain, potatoes, Potential production ranges from 3,000 pounds per acre in and onions. An example of a suitable cropping system is 3 to 4 years of alfalfa followed by corn, corn for silage, favorable years to 2,000 pounds in unfavorable years. As sugar beets, small grain, or beans. Land leveling, ditch range condition deteriorates, the swie and ss, alkali lining, and installing pipelines may be needed for proper sacaton, and western wheatgrass decrease and saltgrass, water application. sedge, and rush increase. All methods of irrigation are suitable, but furrow ir- Management of vegetation should be based on taking half and leaving half of the total annual production. Seed- rigation is the most common. Barnyard manure and com- ing is difficult and costly because numerous tillage prac- mercial fertilizer are needed for top yields. tices are required to eliminate the saltgrass sod. Windbreaks and environmental plantins of trees and Switchgrass, western wheatgrass, alkali sacaton, tall shrubs commonly grown in the area are generally well wheatgrass, and tall fescue are suitable for seeding. They suited to this soil. Cultivation to control competing vegetation should be continued for as many years as can be seeded into a clean, firm seedbed. Seedbed possible following-planting. Trees that are best suited and preparation usually requires more than 1 year to eliminate the saltgrass sod. A grass drill should be used. have good survival are Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern redcedar, ponderosa pine, Siberian elm, Russian-olive, and Seeding early in spring has proven most successful. Wetland wildlife, especially waterfowl, utilize this unit. hackberry. The shrubs best suited are skunkbush sumac, lilac, Siberian peashrub, and American plum. The wetland plants provide nesting and protective cover, This soil can produce habitat elements that are highly as well as some food. The nearby irrigated cropland, suitable for openland wildlife including pheasant, cotton- where wildlife obtain much of their food and find protec- tail, and mourning dove. Such crops as wheat, corn, and tive cover, makes this unit valuable to both wetland and alfalfa provide suitable habitat for openland wildlife, openland wildlife. especially pheasant. Tree and shrub plantings and Openland wildlife, especially pheasant, use this unit for undisturbed nesting cover would enhance openland wil- cover and nesting. Deer find excellent cover in some dlife populations. areas. This Altvan soil has fair to good potential for urban These valuable wildlife areas-should be protected from and recreational development. The chief limiting soil fea- fire and fenced to prevent encroachment and overuse by tures for urban development are the shrink-swell poten- livestock.They should not be drained. tial of the subsoil as it wets and dries and the rapid These soils have good potential as a source of sand and permeability of the sand and gravel substratum. Septic gravel. Capability subclass VIw; Salt Meadow range site. tank absorption fields function properly, but in places the 4—Aquolls and Aquepts, flooded. This nearly level substratum does not contain enough fines to properly map unit is in depressions in smooth plains and along the filter the leachate. Sewage lagoons require sealing. bottoms of natural drainageways throughout the survey Lawns, shrubs, and trees grow well. Capability subclass area. Aquolls, which have a dark colored surface layer, Ile irrigated. make up about 55 percent of the unit. Aquepts, which 3—Aquolls and A-quents, gravelly substratum. This have a lighter colored surface layer, make up about 25 nearly level map unit is on bottom lands and flood plains percent. About 20 percent is soils that are well drained of all the major streams in the survey area. Aquolls, and soils that have sandstone or shale within 48 inches of which have a dark colored surface layer, make up about the surface. 9'4,0222 12 SOIL SURVEY This soil has good potential for urban and recreational Wildlife is an important secondary use of this soil. Th development. Increased population growth in-the survey cropland areas provide favorable habitat for ring-necke, area has resulted in increased homesite construction. The pheasant and mourning dove. Many nongame species cm chief limiting soil features for urban-development are the be attracted by establishing areas for-nesting and escap, shrink-swell potential of the subsoil as it wets and dries cover. For pheasants, undisturbed nesting cover is essen and the limited ability of this soil to support a load. Septic tial and should be included in plans for habitat develop tank absorption fields function properly, -but community -pent, especially in areas of intensive agriculture. Range sewage systems should be-provided if the population den- land wildlife, for example, deer and antelope, can be at sity increases. Because of the moderately rapid permea- tracted by managing livestock grazing and reseedin; bility_of the substratum, sewage lagoons must be sealed. where needed. Lawns, shrubs, and trees grow well. Capability subclass This soil is not suited to urban or recreational develop lie irrigated. 10—Bankard sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent sl ment because of the flood hazard. Capability subclass is a deep, somewhat excessively drained soilopes. This on flood IVw irrigated, VIw nonirrigated; Sandy Bottom land plains at elevations of 4,450 to 5,000 feet. It formed in range site. stratified recent alluvium along streams and rivers. In- deep,11— e ri sandy soillo on 0 to 1 percent slopes.of This 7 is eluded in mapping are numerous sand and a ,80 well drained on llui atm deposited epositsby 4,tlu and small areas of noncalcareous soils. gravel bars to 4,800 feet. It formed in alluvium the South Platte River. Included in-napping are small areas Typically the surface layer of this Bankard soil is brown sandy loam about 4 inches thick. The underlying of soils heate sub have sand and gravelly sand in the lower material to a depth of 60 inches is pale brown calcareous part of thstratum. , loam, and about 11 inches thick. The subsoil is brown and Typically the surface layer is grayish brown sandy loam sand stratified with thin lenses of sandy loam fine gravel. Permeability is moderately rapid. Available water yellowish brown sandy clay loam about 19 inches thick. The sub- stratum to a depth-of 60 inches is loamy sand. capacity is low. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches-or more. Surface runoff is slow, and the erosion hazard is Permeability and available water capacity are low. moderate. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or This soil is suited to limited cropping. It is sandy and more. Surface runoff is slow, and the erosion hazard is subject to flooding.pasture is the best use. Tall wheat- low. grass, tall fescue, and annual sweetclover are some of the This soil is used almost entirely for irrigated crops. It most suitable crops. Light, frequent irrigation by furrows is suited to all crops commonly and flooding is best. Commercial fertilizer improves the ing corn, sugar beets, beans, alfalfa,a smawn ll grain,area tatoe - amount and value of forage produced. potatoes,8 and onions. An example of a suitable cropping system is 3 The potential native vegetation is dominated by to 4 years of alfalfa followed by corn, corn for silage, switchgrass, indiangrass, sand bluestem, sand reedgrass, sugar beets, small grain, or beans. Few conservation prac- sideoats grama, needleandthread, and blue grama. Much tices are needed to maintain top yields. soils and vegetation in g All methods of irrigation are suitable, but furrow ir- of this range site includes other sucha complex pattern that it is difficult to map them rigation is the most common. Barnyard manure and com- mercial fertilizer are needed for top yields. separately. Potential production ranges from 2,500 pounds per acre in favorable years to 1,500 pounds in unfavorable Windbreaks and environmental plantings are generally suited to this soil. Soil blowing, the principal hazard in years. As range condition deteriorates, the tall and mid grasses decrease; -blue grama, sand dropseed, and forbs establishing trees and shrubs, can be controlled by cul- increase; and forage production drops. Undesirable weeds tivating only in the tree row and by leaving a strip of and annuals invade the site as range condition becomes vegetation between the rows. Supplemental irrigation poorer. may be needed at the time of planting and -during dry Management of vegetation should be -based on taking periods. Trees that are best suited and have good survival half and leaving half of the total annual production. Seed- are Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern redcedar, ponderosa ing is desirable only in areas large enough to interseed or pine, Siberian elm, Russian-olive, and hackberry. The to-prepare a seedbed. Switchgrass, sand bluestem, sand shrubs best suited are skunkbush sumac, lilac, and Siberi- reedgrass, sideoatsgrama, little-bluestem, blue grama, pu- an peashrub. bescent wheatgrass, and intermediate wheatgrass are Wildlife is an important secondary use of this soil. suitable for seeding. This soil can be seeded by using an Ring-necked pheasant., mourning dove, and many non- interseeder or a-firm, clean sorghum stubble. A grass drill game species can be attracted by establishing areas for is required. Seeding early in spring has proven most suc- nesting and escape cover. For pheasants, undisturbed cessful. nesting in plans This soil is generally not suited to the establishment for h bitat development, especallyein areas of be d intensive and growth of trees and shrubs. Onsite investigation is agriculture. needed to determine feasibility and possible tree and This soil has good potential for urban and recreational shrub species. development. Lawns, shrubs, and trees grow well. The 900222 ..._._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _• 104 SOIL SURVEY i TABLE 7.--SANITARY FACILITIES [Some of the terms used in this table to describe restrictive soil features are defined in the Glossary. See ! text for definitions of "slight," "moderate," "good," "fair," and other terms used to rate soils. Absence of an entry means soil was not rated) I Soil name and Septic tank Sewage lagoon Trench map symbol absorption areas nits Daily cover fields sanitary sanitary for landfill landfill landfill I 1 , 2 Slight Severe: i Severe: Slight Fair: Altvan seepage. seepage. thin layer. 3*: I Aquolls Severe: Severe: Severe: floods, floods, - Poor: floods, wetness. wetness. i wetness. wetness. wetness. i Aquents Severe: Severe: Severe: floods, floods, Severe: Poor: wetness, floods, wetness. wetness. wetness. wetness. 4': Aquolls Severe: Severe: ! floods, Severe: Severe: Poor: floods, floods, wetness. wetness. i wetness, wetness. i wetness. Aquepts Severe: Severe: 'Severe: floods, floods, Severe: Poor: wetness. floods, wetness. wetness. wetness. wetness. i 5, 6 Slight Ascalon • Severe: Severe: Severe: Good. seepage. seepage. seepage. 7 Severe:Slight Severe: Severe: Good. Ascalon g ere: slope, seepage. seepage. seepage. 8, 9 Slight Severe: Ascalon Severe: Severe: Good. seepage. seepage, seepage. 10 Severe: Severe: Severe: Severe: Fair: Bankard floods. floods, floods, floods. too sandy. seepage. seepage. 11, 12 Slight Bresser Severe: Severe: Severe: Good. seepage. seepage. seepage. 13 Moderate: Severe: Casca o Severe: Severe: Poor: slope. slope, seepage. seepage. small stones. seepage, small stones. 14, 15, 16 Slight Moderate: Slight Slight ht Colby g Good. seepage. 17 Slight Severe: Slight Slight Good. Colby slope. 8 18': Colby Slight Severe: Slight Slight Good. slope. g Adena Moderate: Moderate: Slight Slight peres slowly, seepage, Good. slope. 19 Moderate: Severe: Moderate: Moderate: Good. Colombo floods. floods. floods.. floods. 20 Slight Moderate: Slight Colombo slope Slight food. seepage. See footnote at end of table. 900222 108 SOIL SURVEY TABLE 8.--CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS [Some of the terms used in this table to describe restrictive soil features are defined in the Glossary. See text for definitions of "good," "fair," "poor," and "unsuited." Absence of an entry means soil was not rated] Soil name and Roadfill Sand map symbol 1 Gravel • Topsoil • : : : : 1, 2 Good Fair: ,Fair: ;Fair: Altvan excess fines. I excess fines. I thin layer. 3': Aquolls Poor: Good Fair: Poor: wetness, excess fines. wetness. frost action. , : ' Aquents Poor: Good :Fair: Poor: wetness, I excess fines. wetness. frost action. I I 4*: Aquolls Poor: Unsuited Unsuited Poor: wetness, wetness. frost action. / Aquepts Poor: Unsuited Unsuited Poor: 2 : wetness, wetness. frost action. 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 Fair: Poor: - Unsuited Good. Ascalon : low strength, excess fines. frost action', : shrink-swell. s 6 10 Fair: Fair: Unsuited Poor: Bankard low strength. excess fines. too sandy. 11, 12 Fair: Poor: Unsuited Fair: Bresser frost action. excess fines. r - small stones. k 13 Good Good :Good Poor: C. Cascajo small stones. Ii 14, 15, 16, 17 Fair: Unsuited (Unsuited Good. ll Colby low strength. 18*: Colby Fair: Unsuited Unsuited Good. low strength. z Adena Fair: Unsuited Unsuited Fair: i low strength. too clayey. 19, 20 Fair: Unsuited Unsuited Fair: 4 Colombo low strength, too clayey. frost action. 21, 22 Good Good Good Fair: Dacono too clayey. • 23, 24 Fair: Unsuited Unsuited Good. E Fort Collins low strength. 25, 26 Fair: Unsuited Unsuited Good. Haverson low strength. 9 27, 28 Poor: Unsuited Unsuited Poor: 1 Heldt shrink-swell, too clayey. C low strength. P, . 1 See footnote at end of table. i f 900222 1 WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, SOUTHERN PART 121 TABLE 11.--WILDLIFE HABITAT POTENTIALS [See text for definitions of "good," "fair," "poor," and "very poor." Absence of an entry indicates the soil was not rated] : Potential for habitat elements Potential as habitat for-- Soil name and i Wild map symbol : Grain Grasses : herba- Shrubs Wetland Shallow Openland Wetland ;Rangeland and seed and ceous plants water wildlife wildlife ;wildlife crops'* legumes plants areas ' 1 1 , 2 Good Good Fair ;Fair Poor Very poor Good Very poor:Fair. Altvan . 3': 1 Aquolls Poor Poor Good ;Fair Good Good Fair Good :Fair. Aquents Poor Poor Good :Fair Good Good Fair Good 'Fair. 4': Aquolls Poor Poor Good :Poor :Good Good Fair Good ' Fair. Aquepts Poor Poor Good :Poor :Good Good Fair Good Fair. 5, 6 Good Good Fair ;Fair :Poor Very poor Good Very poor Fair. Ascalon 7 Fair Good Fair ;Fair Poor Very poor Fair Very poor Fair. Ascalon 18, 9 Good Good Fair :Fair Poor Very poor Good Very poor Fair. Ascalon 10 Poor Fair Fair ;Fair Poor Very poor Fair Very poor Fair. Bankard • . 11, 12 Good Good Fair 1Fair Poor Very poor Good Very poor Fair. Dresser ▪ 13 ,Very poor Very poor Fair Fair Very poor Very poor Poor Very poor Fair. tasc ado 14, 15 Good Good Fair Fair. Poor Very poor Good Very poor Fair. Colby 16, 17 Fair Good Fair Fair Poor Very poor Fair Very poor Fair. Colby 18': Colby Fair Good Fair Fair Poor Very poor Fair Very poor Fair. Adena Fair Good Fair Fair Poor Very poor Fair Very poor Fair. .j 19, 20 Good Good Fair Fair Poor Very poor Good Very poor Fair. Colombo 21, 22 Good Good Fair Fair Poor Very poor Good Very poor Fair. Dacono 23, 24 Good Good Fair Fair Poor Very poor Good Very poor Fair. Fort Collins 25, 26 Good Good Fair Fair Poor Very poor Good Very poor Fair. Haver son 27 Fair Fair Poor Poor Poor Poor Fair Poor Poor. Heldt i 28 Fair Fair Poor Poor Poor Very poor Fair Very poor .rPoor. Heldt 29 Good Good Fair Fair Poor Very poor Good Very poor:Fair. Julesburg d 4 30 Good Good Fair Fair Poor Very poor Good Very poor;Fa ir. Julesburg See footnotes at end of table. 200222 i 4 ' ' 124 SOIL SURVEY Si �11. . TABLE 12.--ENGINEERING PROPERTIES AND CLASSIFICATIONS 1VI [The symbol < means less than; > means greater than. Absence of an entry means data were not estimated] ; AI n Classification Frag- Percentage passing t Soil name and Depth USDA texture is ma symbol I menu sieve number-- Liquid tPlas- acit p y Unified ; A0.51iT0 > 3 limit tacit; inches 4 10 , 40 200 index 1 -III Pct Pct '� +], 1, 0-10 Loam CL-ML ,A-4 0 90-100 85-100 60-95 50-75 20-30 5-10 ill 2van 10-25 Clay loam, loam CL 1A-6, A-7 0 25-60 Sand and gravel SP, SP-SM;A-1 0 95-100 95-100 85-100 70-80 35-50 1 NP25 75-95 70-90 25-35 0-10 ---- NP Aquolls 0-48 Variable -__ ___ _ __ ___ _ _ � 48-50 Sand, gravelly SP, SP-SM A-1 0-10 60-90 30-50 0-10 50-70 , --- NP,; sand. 1F Aquents 0-48 Variable __ --- ___ ___ 1" 48-60 Sand and gravel SP, SP-SM A-1 --- NP- i 0-10 60-90 50-70 ,30-50 0-10 --- NP Aquolls 0-60 Variable, ___ ___ ___ ___ ,,g,, Aquepts 0-60 Variable ___ --- --- --- --- , ' 5, 6, 7 0-8 Sandy loam SM A-2, A-4 0 95-100 90-100 70-95 25-50 15-25 NP-5 lk Ascalon 8-18 Sandy clay loam SC, CL A-6 0 95-100 90-100 80-100 40-55 20-40 10-20 * t 18-60 Sandy loam, SC, '!I%+, sandy clay SM-SC, A-4, A-6 0 95-100 95-100,75-95 35-65 20-40 5-15 pP+ti Se loam, fine CL, it}L «. :4-1t- sandy loam. CL-ML 2i • 11 f,. 8, 9 0-8 Loam SM 8-18 Sandy clay loam SC, CL A-6 A-2, A-4 0 95-100 90-100 70-95 ;25-50 15-25 NP-5 Ascalon 0 95-100 90-100 80-100140-55 20-40 10-20 y u 18-60 Sandy loam, SC, A-4, A-6 0 95-100 95-100 75-95 135-65 20-40 5-15 ?,1 sandy clay loam, fine SM-SC, , CL, ' 9! sandy loam. CL-ML ' II! I I 10 $ +. Sandy SM A-2, A-4 0 95-100 90-100 60-70 130-40 NP 4 n 9ankard 4-60 Fine sand, sand, SP-SM, SM A-2, 60-100 40-70 1 5-25 --- NP 0-5 70-100 gravelly sand. A_3 , A-1 1 , j` 11 , 12 0-16 Sandy loam SM ' rr '� Dresser A-1, A-2 0 95-100 75-100 35-50 :20-35 15-25 NP-5 16-25 Sandy clay loam SC A_ a, 2, 0 95-100 75-100 50-70 13o-So 30-55 10-25 A-6, 25-30 Sandy loam, A_7 ' SC, SM-SC A-2, A-1 0 90-100 60-100 30-60 ;20-30 25 .35 5-15 s-, coarse sandy 1i 1' loam, gravell y I sandy loam. 0 30-60 Loamy coarse SP-SC A_ 2, A-1 0-5 80-100,35-85 20-50 I 5-10 20-30 5-10 sand, gravelly r. ..v loamy sand, ';•; 'v very gravelly �1 loamy sand. / , 13 0-9 Gravelly sandy CM A-1, A-2 0-15 50-65 50-60 15-40 10-35 --- NP Cascajo loam. ; t --- 9-31 Very gravelly GP-GM, A-1 0-15 15-50 15-50 5-30 0-20 NP * sandy loam, GP, GM 1 very gravelly t loamy sand, fti9 very gravelly sand. 31-60 Very gravelly GP, SP, A-1 0-15 10-60 10-60 5-30 0-10 NP loamy sand, GP-GM, --- very gravelly SP-SM wNF sand, gravelly u,u i sand. Rlµ See footnote at end or table. If i ti , :, 900222 '3 WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, SOUTHERN PART 129 TABLE 13.--PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF SOILS [The symbol < means less than; > means greater then. The erosion tolerance factor (T) is for the entire profile. Absence of an entry means data were not available or were not estimated] •. I Risk of corrosion Erosion Wind Soil name and Depth Permea- Available Soil Salinity Shrink- factors erodi- map symbol bility water reaction swell Uncoated Concrete I bility capacity potential steel K ' T reuQ- In In/hr In/in p Mmhos/cm — --�- 1, 2 0-10 0.6-2.0 0.20-0.24 6.6-7.8 --- Low Moderate Low 0.24 3 5 Altvan 10-25 0.6-2.0 0.15-0.17 7.4-8.4 <2 Moderate Moderate Low 0.28 25-60 >20 0.02-0.04 7.4-9.0 <2 Low Moderate Low 0.10 i 3": -Aquolls 0-48 48-60 >20 0.04-0.06 7.4-8.4 2-16 Low High Moderate --- Aquents 0-48 48-60 >20 ,0.04-0.06 7.4-8.4 2-16 Low High Moderate --- 4": Aquolls 0-60 --- Aquepts 0-60 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 0-8 0.6-6.0 0.11-0.16 6.6-7.8 <2 Low Low Low 0.17 5 3 Ascalon 8-18 0.6-2.0 0.13-0.15 6.6-7.8 <2 Moderate Moderate Low 0.24 18-60 0.6-6.0 0.11-0.15; 7.9-8.4 <2 Low Moderate Low 0.24 10 -0-4 2.0-6.0 0.09-0. 12 7.4-8.4 <2 Low Moderate Low 0.10 5 3 Bankard 4-60 6.0-20 0.05-0.08 7.4-8.4 <2 Low Moderate Low 0.10 11, 12 0-16 0.6-6.0 0.11-0.13 6.1-7.3 --- Low Low Low 0.10 5 2 Bresser 16-25 0.6-2.0 0.15-0.18 6.6-7.3 --- Low Moderate Low 0.15 25-30 0.6-6.0 0.10-0.13 6.6-7.3 --- Low Low Low 0.10 30-60 2.0-20 0.05-0.08 6.6-7.3 --- Low Low Low 0.10 13 0-9 2.0-6.0 0.07-0.09 7.4-8.4 <2 Low Moderate Low 0.10 5 8 Cascajo 9-31 6.0-20 0.05-0.08 7.4-8.4 <2 Low Moderate Low 0.10 31-60 6.0-20 0.05-0.06 7.4-8.4 <2 Low Moderate Low 0.10 14, 15, 16, 17 0-7 0.6-2.0 0.20-0.24 6.6-8.4 <2 Low Moderate Low 0.37 5 4L Colby 7-60 0.6-2.0 0.17-0.22 7.4_8.4 <2 Low Moderate Low 0.37 18": Colby 0-7 0.6-2.0 0.20-0.24 6.6-8.4 <2 Low Moderate Low 0.37 5 4L 7-60 0.6-2.0 0.17-0.22 7.4-8.4 <2 Low Moderate Low 0.37 Adena 0-6 0.6-2.0 0.18-0.21 6.6-7.8 <2 Low Moderate Low 0.37 5 5 6-9 0.06-0.2 0.16-0.18 6.6-7.8 <2 High High Low 0.24 9-60 0.6-2.0 0.16-0.18 7.4-8.4 <2 Low High Low 0.32 19, 20 0-14 0.6-2.0 0.14-0.18 7.4-8.4 <2 Low High Low 0.32 5 5 Colombo 14-21 0.6-2.0 0.14-0.16 7.4-8.4 <2 Moderate High Low 0.28 21-60 0.6-2.0 0.14-0.16 7.4-8.4 <2 Low High Low 0.28 21, 22 0-12 0.2-0.6 0.19-0.21 6.6-7.8 <2 Moderate Moderate Low 0.24 3 5 Dacono 12-21 0.2-0.6 0.15-0.21 7.4_8.4 <2 High High Low 0.24 21-27 0.2-2.0 0.13-0.18 7.4-8.4 <2 Moderate High Low 0.15 27-60 >20 0.03-0.05 7.4-8.4 <2 Low High Low 0. 10 23, 24 0-7 0.6-2.0 0.16-0.20 6.6-7.8 <2 Low Moderate Low 0.20 5 6 Fort Collins 7-11 0.6-2.0 0.16-0.18 7.4_7.8 <2 Moderate Moderate Low 0.20 11-60 0.6-2.0 0. 16-0.18 7.4_8.4 <2 Low High Low 0.20 25, 26 0-4 0.6-2.0 '0.14-0. 18 6.6-8.4 <8 Low High Low 0.28 5 4L Haverson 4-60 0.6-2.0 0.14-0.18 7.4-8.4 <8 ,Low High Low 0.28 27, 28 0-60:0.06-0.6 0.12-0.17 7.9-9.0 <8 'High High High 0.28 5 4 -Heldt i wee footnote at end of table. 900222 132 SOIL SURVEY TABLE 14.--SOIL AND WATER FEATURES (Absence of en entry indicates the feature is not • concern. See text for descriptions of symbols and such terms as "rare," "brief," and "perched." The symbol < means less than; > means greater than] Flooding High water table Bedrock I Soil name and Hydro- i i Potential t] map symbol logic Frequency Duration Months Depth Kind Months DepthlHard- frost group i ness 1 action 1!..�4' Ft In i { s;; _: f '. . 1, 2 B None --- --- >6.0 --- , --- >60 --- Moderate. r:':'. Altvan 30: ' : Aquolls D Frequent---- Brief Apr-Jun 0.5-1.0 Apparent:Apr-Jun, >60 --- High. { ir1 Aquents D Frequent---- Brief Apr-Jun 0.5-1.0 Apparent:Apr-Jun; >60 --- High. ') Aquolls D Frequent---- Brief Apr-Jun 0.5-1.5 Apparent{Apr-Jun{ >60 --- High. ' Aquepts D Frequent---- Brief Apr-Jun 0.5-1.5 ADparent;Apr-Juni >60 --- ;High. e:. T' > i 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 B None --- --- >6.0 --- ; --- >60 --- .Moderate. d ' Ascalon .;-. : 10 A Frequent---- Brief Mar-Jun >6.0 --- { --- >60 --- Low. ' J Bankard t' 11 , 12 B None --- >6.0 --- --- >60 --- Moderate. 1 Dresser , 9 `k? `.i 13 A None --- --- >6.0 --- :4' Cascajo .,.', 1 14, 15, 16, 17---- B None --- >6.0 --- --- >60 , --- Low. zk, 01 Colby . ___ 180: .� Colby B Nnne --- --- >6.0 --- --- >60 ; --- Low. - `' Adena C None --- >6.0 --- --- >60 i --- Low. '>. ] 19, 20 B Rare --- --- >6.0 --- --- >60 --- Moderate. d Colombo I t' 21, 22 C None --- --- >6.0 --- --- >60 --- Low. 1 Dacono 7 23, 24 -B None to rare --- --- >6.0 --- --- i >60 --- Low. Fort Collins ). ! 25, 26 B Rare to Brief May-Sep >6.0 --- --- ; >60 --- Low. ', Haverson common. 27, 28 C None --- --- >6.0 --- --- ; >60 --- Low. J Heldt 29, 30 A None --- --- >6.0 --- --- >60 --- ,Moderate. ;. Julesburg .1 31 , 32, 33, 34---- B None --- --- >6.0 --- --- >60 --- I Low. 1 Kim 1 a 350: '"i Loup D Rare to Brief Mar-Jun +.5-1.5 Apparent Nov-May >60 --- Moderate. Common Z. -Boel A Occasional Brief Mar-Jun 1.5-3.5 Apparent Nov-May >60 , --- Moderate. t. 360: Midway D None --- --- >6.0 --- --- 10-20:Rip- Low. gable See footnote at end of table. 200222 '-V.e STATE OF COLORADO B . COUNTYOF WELD avid B. Reynolds, being duly sworn , says that he is publisher of the New New=_ , a weekly newspaper published in K:eenesburg in said County and State; that said newspaper has a general circulation in said County and has been continuously and uninterruptedly published therein , during a period of at least NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING . f t y- C , The Weld County Planning �_w G o n s e c u t i vim+ w weeks s prior �_o Commission will hold a public first c bearing on Tuesday, January 9. the , irat publication of the annexed 1990. 1:30 p.m. for the purpose _of cotuiderin a Site S ifice notice; that said newspaper is a Development Plan and a Special Review ppeerrtut for the property newspaper within the meaning of the described below. Aparovat of th request may create a vesteo act of the General Assembly of the zar Lswright pursuant to State of Colorado, entitled "-An Act APPLICANT: APPLICANT: Daniel,and Mildred to regulate the printing of legal �•nDESCRIPTION: Part of notices and advertisements, " and the SE 1/4 NW 1/4 and NE 1/4 SW 1/4 of_Section 33, T6N R66W of amendments thereto; that the notice the 6m P.M.,weld county, Colorado of which the annexed is a printed TYPE AND INTENSITY OF -PROPOSED USE: Gravel Mining anon copy taken r u m Scud newspaper, {.it s ATION: East of Weld County Road 29,el roximately .5 miles ptlb1 fished in said newspaper, and in south of Weld'County-Road 64 Kr:Altair' acres more or less the regular and entire issue of ublic hearing will be held is the ?Veld CountyY tortunissionerm -every number thereof , once -a week. Hearing Roam Firot Floor, weld County Centennial -Center, 915 f a I' o fa e w e e�.: that said notice was -Tenth Street. Greeley, Colorado. Conunebo eor objections relatedbe so published in said newspaper submitted in t�wri to the Weld -proper and not. in any supplement Services,, 915-Department tr t, Room that Services, 9I5 Tenth Street Room thereof , and the first bore Gttietreleoordpresewted publication of said notice as 9t Ithe public hearing on January Cop, of the application are aforesaid , w a s on t h e available for public inspection in the tcDepartment of Planning `reate 1 Center 916 Tenth 14th day of December, 13989, -street, Greelp Colorado awn - -Phone =tension 4100. F n d the last on n the Vela County Planning Commission To be published in the New News pectugepliiergeowe (I) time by 14th day of _December, 1989. Subscribed and sworn to before me this )_ day _of December, 1989. N ary Publi-c y commission expir -i -'Tfl 900222 C E R T I F I C A T E O F M A I L I N G I hereby certify that I have placed a true and correct copy of the surrounding property owners and owners and lessees of mineral-s In accordance with the notification requirements of 4ield County in the case #USR-900 for Mildred and Daniel Buxman in the United States Mail postage prepaid First Class -Mail by postal card as addressed -on the attached list. This -6th day of December, 1989. In 4W 27 TO: SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS OR OWNERS AND LESSEES OF MINERALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH VELD COUNTY'S NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS. The Weld County Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, January 9, 1990, at 1130 F.m. in the -County Commissioners' Hearing Room, first floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado, concerning the request of: CASE NUMBER: USR-900 APPLICANT: Mildred And Daniel Buxman REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a gravel mining _operation in the A (Agricultural) zone district LEGAL: Part of the SE} NW} and NE} SW} of Section 33, 16N, k66W of the -6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: East of Weld County Road 29, Approximately .5 miles south of "0" Street For moreInformation call Lanell J. Curry, Current Planner. WELD COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES 915 10th Street - Room 342 Greeley, CO 80631 Phone 356-4000, Ext. 44-00 900222 SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS MILDRED AND DANIEL BUXMAN USR-900 Belva Jean Von Trotha Murray 11400 _Swearinger Drive -Austin, TX 78758 William and Rebecca McCalmont 127 Russell Street Manchester, New Hampshire 03104 Daniel and Mildred L. -Burman 30598 Weld County Road 29 Greeley, CO 80634 Lowell-Paul Dairy, Incorporated 14132 Weld -County Road 64 Greeley, CO B0631 Loveland Industries, Incorporated P.O. Box 1289 Greeley, CO 80632 Peggy Ann_Ackard J. Lawrence Ackard, Trustees 179 South Monroe _Street Denver, CO 802D9 Windon B. Davis Betsy Davis 2730 Buena Vista Greeley, CO 80631 Ed Orr Susie Ann Orr 801 8th Street, Suite 230 Greeley, CO 80631 Rine Duran 760 North 71st Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 9C-Oz22 • DEPARTMENT OF PLAN NINZ SERVICES \' PHONE(303)356.4000,EXT.4400 91510thtTREET GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 wiipe COLORADO December 6, 1989 Arthur F. Uhrich 822 7th Street Greeley, tO 80631 Subject: DSR-900 — Request for a Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a gravel mining operation in the A (agricultural) zone -di-strict on a parcel of land described as part of the SE} NW} and NEI SW} of Section 33, t6N, -it66W of the 6th P.-M., Weld County, Colorado Dear Mr. Uhrich: Your application and -related materials for the request described above are complete -and in order at the present time. I have scheduled a meeting with the Weld County Planning Commission on Tuesday, January 9, 1990, at 1:30 p.m. This meeting will take place in the County Commissioners' Hearing Room, first floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado. It is recommended that you and/or a _representative be in attendance to answer any questions the Planning Commission members might have with respect to your application. It 1s the policy of Veld County to refer an application of this nature to any town or municipality .lying within three miles of the property in question cr if the property under consideration is located within the comprehensive planning area of a town or -municipality There₹ore, our office has forwarded a copy of the submitted materials to the Greeley Planning Commission for its review -and comments. Please call Steve Hill at 350-9783 for further details regarding the -date, time, and place of this meeting. It is recommended that you and/or a representative te in attendance at the Planning Commission Meeting to answer any questions the Commission members may have with respect to your application. It is the responsibility of an applicant to see that a sign is posted an the property under consideration at least 10 days preceding the hearing date. Sometime prior to December 27, 1989, you or a representative should call me to obtain a sign to be posted on the site no later than December 30, 1989. 900222 Arhtur F. Uhrich December 6, 1989 Page 1 The Department of Planning Services' staff will make a recommendation concerning this application to the Weld County Planning Commission. It is the responsibility of the applicant to call the tepartment iof Planning Services' office a Sew days -before the date of the Planning Commission hearing to obtain -that xecommendation. If you have any questions concerning this utter, please feel free to call me. Respectfully, 6%tailad. 6147- Lanell Z. Curry Current -Planner LJC:dn 3002 'l f‘:D. fEifO f DUM �®y_ Lanell Curry, Planning January 8, 1990 • To Dare (� Drew Srheltirrga, County -Engineer COLORADO From Buxman Gravel Pit - USR-900 Subject: In _my memo of December 11, 1989, I indicated excavation within 10 feet of the east sight—el-way line of Weld County Road 29 spas not accept-able. I discussed the setback problem with Art Uric-k of Nelson Engineers. We agreed no excavation should occur within 30 feet of the existing rightof-way line or -within £0 feet of the section line. • DS/zw:zmlc 9L0222 cc: Commissioner Kirby _ _ Buxman Gravel Pit, USR-909 ` ry File i _ f , JAM a 1947 idd madossissuu DANIEL BUXMAN WELD COUNTY, COLORADO APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR GRAVEL MINING AND RECLAMATION N0V-EMBER , 1989 PREPARED BY; NELSON ENGINEERS822 7th sTREET Q G-REELET,, EOLORADO 900222 80S3I NELSON ENGINEERS GREELEY NATIONAL PLAZA 822 7TH STREET GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 (303)356-6362 December 1 , 1989 Weld County Department of Planning Weld County Services Building 915 Tenth Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 -Re: Daniel Buxman, -Greeley, Colorado Use By Special Review Permit Application Dear Ladies and Gentlemen: The accompanying application is a request for a Use By Special Review (USR) permit for the extraction of gravel in the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, and the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 33 , Township 6 North, -Range 66 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, Weld County, Colo- rado. The property is owned by Daniel and Mildred L. Buxman. The site is located east of Weld County -Road 29 , one mile north of Fourth Street, Greeley, Colorado, and the site abuts the north side of the Cache La Poudre River. Properties along the Cache La Poudre River have a high commercial value for sand and gravel as seen by the number of gravel mines in the area. As the Weld County Comprehensive Plan states , the present economy along the front range corridor is causing an increased demand for sand and gravel extraction in Weld County. To be con- sistent with the Comprehensive Plan, extraction must follow a rehabilitation plan, which is presented in the application. The location is consistent with surrounding mines and is compatible -with the Comprehensive Plan guidelines on mineable lands . The area has been investigated for its potential use as farm- land. Due to the relatively thin layer of overburden and poor surface drainage, grasses and weeds are primary source of vegeta- tion. Table 5 of the U. S. Soil Conservation Service ' s "Soil Survey, Weld County, Southern Part" reveals yields of crops to be poor to marginal. 'The application proposes safeguards to prevent access to the site during nonworking hours with secure fencing and locked gates . 200222 Weld County Department of Planning December 1 , 1989 Page Two As previously stated, the proposed use is compatible with the surrounding land uses both east and west. The land to the north of the site is agricultural . The land to the south of the site on the bluffs overlooking the river has been urbanized. As the demand for more gravel for construction purposes increases, more o₹ the land along the Cache La Poudre River will probably become gravel mines . The site lies within the 100-year floodprone zone; however, the applicant proposes mitigation to minimize damage to permanent structures. The site does not lie in a geologic hazard zone or the Weld County airport overlay district area. We trust that this application has addressed the Use By _Special Review requirements and concerns of Weld County. If you have questions, please contact our office. -Respectfully, NELSON ENGINEERS Arthur F. Uhrich Project Manager AFU/gc Enclosures 900222 WELD COUNTY, COLORADO USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW APPLICATION for MINING PERMIT Weld County Department of Planning Services, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado, Phone 356-4000, Extension 4400 For Department of Planning Services Use Only Case Number: Date Application Received: PC Hearing Date: Section: , Township: North, Range: West Zoning District: Recording £ee: Permit Fee: Recording Fee Receipt #: Receipt Number: Application Reviewed By: To be completed by APPLICANT in accordance with procedural guide Requirements: 1. I (we) , the undersigned, hereby request a hearing before the Weld County Planning Commission concerning a proposed gravel (gravel, coal, dorrowpit , etc.) mining operation for the following described unincorporated area of Weld -County: LEGAL DESCRIPTION see Plan Sheet 1 TOTAL ACREAGE: 9.6 2. Surface owner(s) of area of land described Name: Daniel Buxman Address: 30598 WCR 29 Phone: 357-4672 Name: Mildred L. Buxman Address: Greeley. CO. 80634 Phone: 3. owner(s) of -mineral rights to substance to be -mined Name: Address: Phone: Name: Address: Phone: 4. Source of applicants' legal right to enter and to mine on the land described: see copy of deed (Attached certified copy of any document noted to the back of this form) 5 . Address of applicant and general office Applicants address: 30598 WCR 29, Greeley, £0. 80634 Phone: 352-4622 General Office address: Phone: 6. Identify any -prior permits for mining held by applicant or affiliated person: None J Q0 'z 7. 'Description of Operation a. Types and number of operating an processing equipment to be employed: front end loader and dozer. dragline b. Maximum number of employees: 2 , and number oT shifts: 1 c. Number or stages to be worked: 1 , and periods of time each is to be worked: 1990-2006 d. Thickness of -mineral neposit: 13 feet, and thickness of the overburden: 3 feet • e. This will be a wet/ciay pit operation. f. Site entrance/exit _points and county roads and bridges to be utilized between site and delivery point(s) (must be coordinated with County Engineer) : ingress/egress- Weld County Road 29 north to "0" Street. 8. Description of -Rehabilitation a. Proposed rehabilitation land use(s) : recreational b. Source of technical advice ₹or reclamation: Nelson Engineers and U.S. Soil Conservation Service c. Explanation of -Reclamation Trocess: see Exhibit "-E" I hereby depose and state under the penalties of -perjury that all statements, proposals and/or plans submitted with or contained within [his application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. COUNTY OF Weld STATE OF Colorado • 4t 41/2) Z-` Al 1 1ul"ri-7 Signature: Owner/Authorized Agent Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of , 19_ SEAL NOTARY PUBLIC My Commission expires r� 900222 ATTACHMENT TO LIMITED IMPACT OPERATION 110 ( 2 ) PERMIT APPLICATION TO MINED LAND RECLAMATION PERMIT FOR DANIEL BUXMAN NOVEMBER, 19-89 APPLICANT: DANIEL BUXMAN 30598 WELD COUNTY ROAD 29 GREELEY, COLORADO 80b34 ( 303 ) 352-4622 PREPARED BY: NELSON ENGINEERS GREELEY NATIONAL PLAZA 822 SEVENTH STREET, SUITE 520 GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 ( 303 ) 35-6-63-62 PROJECT NO. 917 9°0222 EXHIBI i LEGAL DESCRIPTION A TRACT OF LAND LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER ( SE 1/4 , NW 1/4 ) AND THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (NE 1/4, SW 1/4 ) OF SECTION 33 , TOWNSHIP 6 NORTH, RANGE 66 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE CENTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW 1/4 ) AND CONSIDERING THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (SE 1/4, NW 1/4) TO BEAR SOUTH 02°00 ' 00" WEST, WITH ALL OTHER BEARING RELATIVE THERETO; THENCE SOUTH 02°00 ' 00" WEST, 977 . 30 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTE-R AND THE CENTERLINE OF WELD COUNTY ROAD 29 TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 89°35 ' OD" EAST, 640 . 00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 16°28 ' 1D" EAST, 520 . 09 -FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°35 ' 00" EAST, 389 . 34 FEET TO A POINT IN THE CENTERLINE OF THE CACHE LA POUDRE RIVER; THENCE ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF SAID RIVER THE FOLLOWING FIVE ( 5 ) COURSES AND DISTANCES: SOUTH 79°40 ' 00" WEST, 108 .79 FEET; SOUTH 39°20 ' 00" WEST, 440 .00 FEET; SOUTH 14°05 ' OD" WEST, 318 .0D FEET; SOUTH 42°45 ' OD" WEST, 420.00 FEET; SOUTH 70°00 ' 00" WEST, 480. 00 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF WELD COUNTY ROAD 29 ; THENCE NORT-H 02°00 ' 00" EAST, -650 . 00 FEET TO THE TRUE -POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCLUDING PURCHASF OF ONE HALF RIGHT-OF-WAY BY WELD COUNTY AS RECORDED IN BOOK 1244, RECEPTLON NO. 0219192E OF WELD COUNTY RECORDS, SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 9.542 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. 900222 I S.' �,, ii+'c.v 32 50 $6' T -� 0 -48 tt t inn.0787.1‘ .,` I a 2 • "K f01'�- �^ a f* �ws af. .11"1"8:I eta✓ *--- E t :, - ^js55 �'+0Us ... y r r- `4 �`.'t. '' t r T'1�/`.fits' a° f"^oya'it DRE ...< ki � I x'` w1 I t , y% r v 7+=fre, ur 4)-‘,.‘ 4.:•\.,„(, 3, (7,)-', P, y Z 1 /„"° t g, y' G '„'9.`r' 7 x s. r” t; . -1,-,,,,,„,54-kb.--,,--.0,-3,,n,-.11. :1:;7144:44 h e ZY 7,-," I ySe i rr 1 k 1. -4. 9.�ss tt+- m`\.. ' `^ �'`° ) 14�} rtf ` ` .; `i -4C'-el--v i �" s,,,,,11-';';‘,44,1;-: � � X ` r ,' {. w Q`t ,,a j1 '₹�'s� � 1 Grp.lt'31 y 4, > :.. v '7,.: , $,.,..�4 ;ra"�yk t3t ' or -?_-_,.. .,.....v.* `+{ E✓ - ,'c fh mod`^ «rte '-k'aX,'1,'r tt '17,%,:-,,,, n re 1,41 `51 , 13 52 •s!'; *Tit, .?S .%-",:-4.'S 174-64:18,11 - `r \ �Y. 61 � 2 ; _ Ym ' j""2"t-12. P 11/3642 51 • °'/F5 53� 51 1 ;gEC9.. - �� 51 i2 3] 52 Oi �iy' q i 4 i 53 181 5 61 ri s Fr , 38 .. - . b „x 1 't=ti 5 3 ,'�Frf�, 1 51" ; M' u+ 53 51 F bey, 1 .� 388 1 13" 1 _ 53 "'+ 53 �.. 4w b e 32. 52 . 1 S] � 1 st N '2mr, 52 13 381 s +4.38 ,,, `q tip`{ ;� Irrp4x.1 t k` 20 38 0..t6.} r3 -1,2..40#81,C81.1" ®a + 13 _ c 52 1t2 1 "Lis 5151 y ': �13140 8 , 1i190s3 �4I J52 F r aFs... ♦ ` i` !� 1 38 81 .I± ;�,��^tr tt 1 1C'�' 52 , , e 50 x,, \ 2,43 ti38 lS r v rr e "41.x N F T h • 35 `"" ddd��+++ C1 4' 1 1 (wle ` r io \+s�2 j 76 3 52 '7,1' �..77 it ( Ap , , �.{y� i 51 51 m 6r r 3 "J'g^ Y r] 51 �6a n]l 1. . i •i q a t .. . � mr . �, 17 riet 2 v.r 15 ?-) \ _ \ __ III 8 SOIL SURVEY I filter the leachate. Sewa lagoons require sealing. 60 percent of the unit. Aquents, which have a lighter II I Lawns, 70w and trees ow well. Capability su class colored surface layer, make up about 35 percent. About 5 Its irrig percent is Aquepts and-Bankard sandy loam. ' 2—Alm, 1 o 3 percent slopes. This . a deep, These are deep, poorly drained soils that formed in I well dral o rraces at-elevations of 4 0 to 4,900 recent alluvium. No one pedon is typical. Commonly the feet. Itformed ' old alluvium deposited y the major soils have a mottled, mildly alkaline to moderately al- rivers. in mapping are small ar s of soils that kaline loamy or clayey surface layer and underlying show evf poor drainage. Also ' eluded are small, material and are underlain by sand or sand and gravel I I long an areas of sand and gr• el deposits. within 48 inches. In places they have a gleyed layer in the Typisurface layer of thi Altvan soil is grayish underlying material. brow loam about 10 inches thi . The subsoil is brown Most of the acreage is subject to flooding. The water an ight yellowish brown clay oam and sandy clay loam table is at or near the surface early in spring and recedes III out 14 inches thick.-The su tratum is calcareous loamy to as-deep as 48 inches late in fall in some years. sand about 5 inches thick o r gravelly sand. These soils are used for rangeland and wildlife habitat. Permeability and a ailable water capacity are Some small areas have been-reclaimed by major drainage moderate. The effectiv rooting depth is 20 to 40 inch . and leveling and are used for irrigated crops. LI Surface runoff is me um, and the erosion hazard is I The potential native vegetation is dominated by alkali This soil is used }most entirely for irrigated c ps. It sacaton, switchgrass, and western wheatgrass. Saltgrass, is suited to all c ps commonly grown in the ar , includ- sedge, rush, and alkali bluegrass are also prominent. ing corn, saga eets, beans, alfalfa, small gr ' , potatoes, Potential production ranges from 3,000 pounds per acre in it and onions. example of a suitable cropp' g system is 3 favorable years to 2,000 pounds in unfavorable years. As to 4 year of alfalfa followed by corn orn for silage, range condition deteriorates, the switchgrass, alkali sugar b ts,-small grain, or beans. nd leveling, ditch sacaton, and western wheatgrass decrease and saltgrass, III III lining, nd installing pipelines may e needed for-proper sedge, and rush increase. ', wat application. Management of vegetation should be based on taking 11 methods of irrigation ar suitable, but furrow ir- half and leaving half of the total annual production. Seed- , -ngation is the most common. arnyard manure and com- -rnercial fertilizer are neede for top yields. ing is difficult and costly because numerous tillage prac- Windbreaks and envir mental plantins of trees and tices are required to eliminate the saltgrass sod. shrubs commonly gro in the area are generally well Switchgrass, western wheatgrass, alkali sacaton, tall I' suited -to this soil. Cultivation to control compel g wheatgrass, and tall fescue are suitable forseeding. They vegetation should e continued for as many yea as can be seeded into a clean, firm seedbed. Seedbed possible follow' planting. Trees that are best su• ed and preparation usually requires more than 1 year to have good s ival are Rocky Mountain junip ,eastern eliminate the saltgrass sod. A grass drill should be used. II redcedar, p derosa pine, Siberian elm, Russ' -olive, and Seeding early in spring has proven most successful. hackbe The shrubs best suited are sk kbush sumac, Wetland wildlife,especially waterfowl, utilize this unit. lilac, Si erian peashrub, and American p m. The wetland plants provide nesting and protective cover, T - soil can produce habitat elem ts that are highly as well as some food. The nearby irrigated cropland. I.I sd ble for openland wildlife incl ing pheasant, cotton- where wildlife obtain much of their food and find protec- tail, and mourning dove. Such ps as wheat, corn, and tive cover, makes this unit valuable to both wetland and alfalfa provide suitable hab- t for openland wildlife, openland wildlife. III I especially pheasant. Tree and shrub plantings and Qpenland wildlife, especially pheasant, use this unit for undisturbed nesting coy would -enhance openland wil- cover and nesting. Deer find excellent cover in some dlife populations. areas. I This Altvan soil s fair to good potential for ur an These valuable wildlife areas should be protected frorr Iand recreational d elopment. The chief limiting s ' fea- fire and fenced to prevent encroachment and overuse 133 tures for urban evelopment are the shrink-sw poten- livestock. They should not be drained. tial of the s soil as it wets and dries an the rapid These soils-have good potential as a source of sand ant permeabili of the sand and gravel subs turn. Septic gravel. Capability subclass VIw; Salt Meadow range site. tank abs tion fields function properly, t in places the 4—Aquolls a d Aquepts, flooded. T -s nearly leve III substr um does not contain enough ines to properly map unit is i epressions in smooth p ns and along t I. filt the leachate. Sewage lago s require sealing. bottoms o natural drainageways t oughout the su e3 L ns, shrubs, and trees grow %' I. Capability subclass area. A oils, which have a dar colored surface ayer j Ile irrigated. make p about 55 percent of e unit. Aquep , whit} i 3—Aquolls and Aquents, gravelly substratum. This ha a lighter colored surf e layer, make about 2! nearly level map unit is on bottom lands and (rood plains rcent. About 20 perce is soils that ar well drainer of all the major streams in the survey area. Aquolls, and soils that have sand tone or shale wit in 48 inches o which have a dark colored surface layer, make up about the surface. , 900222 'I 1`2 SOU. SURVEY This soil has good p ential for urban an recreational Wildf e is an important secondary use of this soil. The development. Increa population growl in the survey crop d areas provide favorable habitat for ring-necked area has resulted . increased homesit construction. The p asant and mourning dove. Many nongame species can chief limiting s . features for urban evelopment are the e attracted by establishing areas for nesting and escape shrink-swell tential of the subs as it wets and dries cover. For pheasants, undisturbed nesting cover is essen- and the Ii ed ability of this so' to support a load. Sep - tial and should be included in plans for habitat develop- tank a orption fields functi properly, but comm ity ment, especially in areas of intensive agriculture. Range- sew e systems should be rovided if the populatio den- land wildlife, for example, deer and antelope, can be at- si increases. Because the moderately rapid ermea- tracted by managing livestock grazing and reseeding ility of the substrat , sewage lagoons must e sealed. where needed. Lawns, shrubs, a trees grow well. Capa ty subclass This soil is not suited to urban or recreational-develop- IIe irrigated. ment because of the flood hazard. Capability subclass 10—Bankard sandy lnam -a to 3 percent slnnus. This IVw irrigated, VIw nonirrigated; Sandy Bottom land is a deep, somewhat excessively drained soil on flood range site. plains at elevations of 4,450 to 5,000 feet. -It formed in 11 resser sandy loam 0 to 1 percent slo s. This is stratified recent alluvium along streams and rivers. In- a d p, well drained soil terraces at elev ons of 4,700 eluded in mapping are numerous sand and gravel -bars to 4,800 feet. It fo d in alluvium de osited by the and small areas of noncalcareous soils. outh Platte River. eluded in mappin are small areas Typically the surface layer of this Bankard soil is of soils that have and and gravelly and in the lower brown sandy loam about 4 inches thick. The underlying part of the subst turn. material to a depth of 60 inches is pale brown calcareous Typically the urface layer isgra sh brown sandy loam sand stratified with thin lenses of sandy loam, loam, and about 11 inc s thick. The subsoi is brown and yellowish fine gravel. brown san clay loam about 9 inches thick. The sub- Permeability is moderately rapid. Available water stratum t a depth of 60 inch is loamy sand. capacity is low. The effective rooting depth is-SO inches or Perm ability and av ' ble water capacity a e more. Surface runoff is slow, and the erosion hazard is mode te. The effective Doting depth is 60 inche or low. This soil is suited to limited cropping. It is sandy and mor . Surface runoff is slow, and the erosion ha rd is subject to flooding. Pasture is the best use. Tall wheat- lo grass, tall fescue, and annual sweetclover are some of the This soil is used ost entirely for irrigate crops. It most suitable crops. Light,-frequent irrigation by furrows is suited to all cro commonly grown in th rea includ- and flooding is best. Commercial fertilizer improves the ing corn, sugar b ets, beans, alfalfa, small 'n, potatoes, amount and value of forage produced. and onions. An xample of a suitable cro ing system is 3 The potential native vegetation is dominated by to 4 years o alfalfa followed by co corn for silage, switchgrass, indiangrass, sand bluestem, sand reedgrass, sugar beets small grain, or beans. F conservation prac- sideoats grama, needleandthread, and blue grama. Much tices are eded to maintain top yi ds. of this range site includes other soils and vegetation in All thods of irrigation are suitable, but furrow ir- such a complex pattern that it is difficult to map them rigati is the most common. arnyard manure and com- separately. Potential production ranges from 2,500 pounds mer al fertilizer are needed or-top yields. per acre in favorable years to 1,500 pounds in unfavorable indbreaks and enviro ental plantings are gener ly years. As range condition deteriorates, the tall and mid suited to this soil. Soil owing, the principal haza in grasses decrease; blue grama, sand dropseed, and forbs establishing trees and hrubs, can be controlled cul- 1 increase; and forage production-drops. Undesirable weeds tivating only in-the ee row and by leaving strip of and annuals invade the site as range condition becomes vegetation betwee the rows. Supplementa irrigation poorer. may be needed the time of planting an during dry Management of vegetation should be based on taking periods. Trees at are best suited and ha good survival I half and leaving half of the total annual production. Seed- are Rocky M ntain juniper, eastern-re cedar, ponderosa ing is desirable only in areas large enough to interseed or pine, Sibe ' n elm, Russian-olive, a d haekberry. The to prepare a seedbed. Switchgrass, sand bluestem, sand shrubs b t suited are skunkbush s ac, lilac, and Siberi- reedgrass, sideoats grama, little bluestem, blue grama, pu- an pea rub. I bescent wheatgrass, and intermediate wheatgrass are W. life is an important se ondary use of this soil. suitable for seeding. This soil can be seeded by using an Ri -necked pheasant, mou ing dove, and many no interseeder or a firm, clean sorghum stubble.-A grass drill g me species can be att ed by establishing areas or is required. Seeding-early in spring has proven most sue- nesting and -escape coy r. For pheasants, undis rbed Icessful. nesting cover is essen ' 1 and should-be included ' plans This soil is generally not suited to the establishment for -habitat develop nt, especially in areas o intensive and growth of trees and shrubs. Onsite investigation is agriculture. needed to determine feasibility and possible tree and This soil has ood potential for urban recreational shrub species. development. Lawns, shrubs, and tree grow well. The I 90O222 I 96 SOIL SURVEY TABLE 5.--YIELDS PER ACRE OF IRRIGATED CROPS [All yields were estimated for a high level of management in 1975. Absence of a yield figure indicates the crop is seldom grown or is not suited] Soil name and Scans, map symbol :Alfalfa hay Sugar beets) Corn Corn silage dry pinto Onions Potatoes Ton Ton Bu Ton Lb Sack Cwt 1, 2 5.0 23 160 33 2400 525 325 Altvan __ ___ ___ quolls ___ ___ Aquolls __ ___ 5 Ascalon . __ ___ .. Ascalon __ ___ Ascalon 8 5.5 24 180 35 2700 550 350 Ascalon 9 5.5 23 160 33 2400 525 325 Ascalon 10 2.5 ___ 50 ___ ___ ___ nkard 11 5.5 24 180 35 2700 550 350 Bresser 12 5.5 23 160 33 2400 525 325 Bresser ___ ___ Cascajo 14 5.5 24 180 35 2700 --- --- Colby 15 5.5 23 160 33 2400 --- --- Colby 16 4.0 18 100 23 1800 --- --- Colby 17 3.0 --- 80 20 ___ ___ --- Colby __ ___ Colby 19* 5.5 24 170 35 2700 550 350 Colombo 20* 5.5 23 160 33 2000 525 325 Colombo 21 5.5 26 170 33 2400 525 325 Dacono 22 5.5 25 150 30 2400 525 325 Dacono 23 5.5 24 180 35 2700 550 --- Fort Collins See footnote at end of table. 900222 EXHIBIT &L` MINED LAND WILDLIFE QUESTIONAIRE for limited impact and select regular mine applications 1. Name of Company/Mine: Daniel Buxman 2. Name/Address/Phone of Contact Person: Daniel Buxman, 30598 Weld County Road 29, Greeley, Colorado 80634 3. Location of Mine: SE 1/4 of NW 1/4, Sec. 33, T6N, R66 West, Weld County, Colorado (County, Township, Range, Section to nearest quarter quarter; Exhibit A-:•SLR appl. ) 4. Nearest Town/General Location: Greeley, Colorado 5. Land Ownership (Circle) 1. Privat') 2. BLM 3. USFS 4. Other 6. Present Land Use: Pasture - agricultural • 7. Proposed Final Land Use: Recreation 8. Type of Operation: 1. Surface 2. Underground 9. Minerals being mined: Gravel 10. Number and Description of Surface Acres Disturbed by Mining/not including roads (Exhibit D-MLR) : 9.5 acres 11. Miles of roads to be constructed: none 12. Life of Mine (years) : 16 years 13. Description of Operation and Reclamation -- Additional sheets may be attached (Exhibits B S E-MLR) The owner plans to operate the facility privately and sell gravel on a limited basis. Strictly a non-commercial operation. No crushers or batch plants will be used. After completion of mining, the owner plans to reclaim the area as fishing and recreational. 14. Please enclose Maps of Project Operation, Disturbance Areas and Reclamation (Exhibit C. ) This will expedite processing. Your cooperation is appreciated. Sat7 iU.J ///7/8796O222 15, Prepared by: Date: "" - Page 1 of 2 RECEIVED N0V 2 2 1989 MINED LAND WILDLIFE STATEMENT/EVALUATION (Revised) for limited impact and select regular mine applications The following information pertaining to wildlife is provided for use by Mined Land Reclamation Board in their consideration of a mining permit for: Daniel Buxman - Sand & Gravel - SE}NWI & 2 acres NWiNESWI , Sec 33, T6N, R66W, Weld County Name/Type and Location of Mine (Legal) Wildlife Species list: Deer, coyote, fox,skunk, opossum, raccoon, weasel, beaver, muskrat, waterfowl, pheasant, dove, shorebirds, raptors, seasonal songbirds and small rodents Endangered/critical species/impacted: No known threatened or endangered species. Critical habitats/vegetative communities impacted: NA Assessment of impact: Minor --area indicates rather extensive use in the past and vegetation is primarily composed of salt grass. Mine Reclamation recommendations (include key species/habitats for which restoration is designed) . It is recommended that the bottom surface of the pond be left irregular. Also, the banks should be sloped at no steeper than 3:1 and leave the bank with an irregular shoreline. Since fish and wildlife development is planned for the final product, it is further recommended that any surplus spoil material be used to create an island(s) . Tall grasses, shrubs and native cottonwood should be used in the revegetation plans. Prepared By: Zit) g4/ Date: ///:2-)1/1 Submitted By: Date: This statement is void if not processed within 1 year.This analysis does not constitute approval of application. 9€0222 Page 2 of 2 EXHIBIT B - Site Description 1 . Description of vegetation and soil characteris- tics - Plan Sheet 1 of 2 , Vicinity Map and Exhibit B; United States Soil Conservation Ser- vice Text from "Weld County Soil Survey - Southern Part" . 2 . Description of wildlife that might be affected - see Exhibit B. 3 . Identified manmade structures within 200 feet - see Exhibit E (Plan Sheet 1 of 2 ) . 900222 EXHIBIT C - Mining Plan 1. The operator intends to begin mining immediately after application approval, approximately January 1990 , and operate for approximately 16 years, selling 25 , 000 tons per year, which will vary due to economics . 2. and 3 . The overburden averages about 3 feet thick and will be stockpiled on the westerly portion of the site until operator begins to reclaim the east half . Then excess overburden will be used to create an irregular shoreline in the excavated area. Topsoil will be stockpiled on Buxman' s farm adjacent to the 9 . 6 acres and out of the 100-year floodprone zone. 4. The gravel thickness to be mined averages approxi- mately 10 feet. 5 . Ingress and egress will be located on Weld County Road 29 at the northwest corner of the site . No major components are anticipated. Any processing will be handled offsite by the operator ' s clients . 6 . See Exhibit E. The mineable area comprises 7 . 7 acres ( 335 , 412 s . f . ) , constituting a five-sided figure with the longest reach being the boundary along the Cache La Poudre River. 7 . No proposed roads are anticipated since the mined area lies along Weld County Road 29 . Access will be directly from a public road. Due to the low production anticipated, no additional stress to the county road is contemplated. 8 . No water is to be used in conjunction with the mining operation . 9 . No dewatering will be used for the mining opera- tion. Gravel will be mined underwater and deposited on a stockpile with slopes allowing water to drain back into the excavation . 10 . The operator intends to comply with applicable Colorado water laws and regulations governing water rights through use of existing water rights for augmentation, if required . No water is con- sumed or generated as a result of the mining operation. 900222 11 . No on-site processing of mined gravel is antici- pated. All material will be hauled off the site to be used as mined or will be processed at an- other location. 900222 EXHIBIT D - Reclamation Plan 1. Overburden will be used to widen and stablize the existing Cache La Poudre River embankment. All finished slopes will be 3 :1 with overburden material used to stabilize the remaining peri- meter slopes Backfilling of the mined areas will be performed within one year after an area has been completed . 2 . As previously stated , backfilled slopes will be no greater than 3 : 1 . 3 . Topsoil 12 inches in depth will be used on dis- turbed areas and on the 3: 1 slopes to the water line. 4 . The reclaimed site will be seeded with grasses compatible with the area as described by Soil Conservation Service - see Exhibit B-1 . Applica- tion rates of seed and fertilizer recommended by the Soil Conservation Service will be reviewed and followed. 5. Species of grasses , forbs, shrubs, and trees will be planted according to the recommendation of the Soils Conservation Service. 6 . The application rate and method recommended by Soil Conservation Service for planting seed will be followed. 7 . A straw mulch will be used, at a rate of 4 , 000 pounds per acre. 8 . A five-acre pond will be retained south of the existing farm yard and house as shown on Exhibit E. As previously stated, pond slopes will be maintained at a 3 : 1 slope or gentler. 9 . No mining wastes , such as waste rock, and build- ings that would be involved in the reclamation process are anticipated . 10 . Reclamation Costs - ( 1989 Dollars ) : Finished Grading $2 , 500 Seeding 400 Fertilizing 3, 800 Topsoiling 960 Total Estimate $7 , 660 900222 •. .s...•cinawasicamarieet It=anal keg,F • Y ' r' ,1 3 T` t\ Y'rrt+XC{+ 2 1 '4� �ia4.rty34 .FY VP .K'.-t '^ S. :141;le, if 'SS I's K14”. ,�g Yf/ ;.ta t :t,N y r44:21/4: t' S �� l I �r'�"ik cl Y ''f�A't� ~;• lYe -o. �"$►vi4L� ,'ry, 1'!�Yjl'`fi� �(�C ^1tY{ fikt tR�'Y/t1.•?'i� ` 1 ,:O. Sct Fs°.+i( k gm IGg .yAI/7.P mVG 5 Jh e��` 1 y�ytA 4C ' O�tt, s VcA a'+ M1L h�11eY, r �`t > to +f3 ,yst� ,y sIt t r of ttr � ,'4y�� v , t ATIR T4 D �(¢ �1 ! 6 7 �.67ti n s i�'1Ci^'i' CtSci1' a 'f< M1H'i Yr.� Yt �'<n 1a,Sd v4 vaEY�ia5 yv� ��7 ;.,��. 'yg'�. rd A41;xi jirBt^TH,ESE PREdi TS„T`7 t HF IH' NN"land-arkil},d�,�� yyYnb�"� 1.4.1: ,t �. , , � Etv H.A ttrt'�rE,e�s!iY,f'Y.,S 11..,A.,,,/, 4.7';-44,W.,-:14 W ti'1"-r,�, iL`Aii µkHNQ�thg 0wuft3' of Weld, and tate;�'' 6M.Thdo, for the i; � -r 3i'tJ ,r, :7Xa , 4, ` ,�"J'vv99 yY 'vrY a 'v 1 4fz \.. ,47,9tf Y 31,; s Qw4d14fhAlt41oc -other.:valtiab3 o .con Sderationn,Huut une hundred i''t' sfir rt,t% (��OQ b0)�,r�4l�ara„yin hand paid, hereby;s"1 and convey to' 7...;:,....%i.: 7 �fPSt�Wi, DAHTE "35. -..qA`U; ad MILDRED L. BN�e(, . of„the 'County '61' Weld 1 'and• y siw al>8tate of Co16auo to !', 4 . pass not in tenancy in common hut in ,-odor, '. tenancy, withright of survivorship, the following described.real . r: ( _ property, situate to the County of Weld, State of Colorado, to- 0;s; i\tt Beginning at the center of the Northwest Quarter. (NWC) of :1 . ,, . Section Thirty-three (33) ,-in Township.Six (6) .North, Rang. •.f , N.r OiCas Sixty-six (66) West of the 6th P.M. ; thence South 20 West '( ' "•A ' ! ' 1627.3 feet; thence North 70° East 7.80 feet; thence North ' F% 42° 45' East 420 feet;: .thence North 14° '5' East 318 feet; 't+ rt, -thence North 39° 20' East 440 feet; thence North 79° 40'. �. vit. wr,N East 275 feet, more or.leas, to the North and South center t \..« . line of said Section o 27' Ir f yt% - said center line 446 feet, more or rr less, to the n North along ine ';li r,\_w_!,gPS!i �'"bw I11 of said SEC of the N4f4 of Section 33 ; thence North 89° 35' c . West 131" feet-along said North line +f said Si.; of the NWC of said Section 33 to the place-of beginning, being than. ,Miuhks {h. portion of the 3E4 of IPA and the NES of the SWC of said 1 . Section 33 lying North of the center line of the Cache la ( , • -Poudre River as • A; existing. e +?.� Also all that part of the SW4 of the NE} of Section 33, in Township 6 North, Range Mt West of the 6th P.M. , lying North of the Cache la .Poudre Fiver and more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a fence post marking the center 1 ^� , 1Vil of the NEt of said Section 33; thence by true bearing vari-al .` ation 14° 30' East as follows South 100 feet, South 52° 35' West 180 feet, South 28° 30' best 280feet, South 43° 00' eilltet West 112 feet, South 69° 15' West 208 feet, North 80° 40' --- �: y . West 160 feet, North 610 44' West 325 feet, North 85° -30' zi + West 372 feet to the West line of the SWC of the NE} of said Y-/. ;'4.3 Section 333 ; North 2° 50' East 395 feet to the North line of +t ;T''.„ ,*;A§4' the SAC of the NEC of said Section 33,- North 89° 37' East ( at25+^Ik 1335 feet to the point of beginning,;together with all water, F'4 • 1"�•'n+4T`i1`-' ' water rights, seepage, irrigation pumps,' butane tank and• IS. ,. xn .0-.11444,1! equipment' therewith, wells, carriage rights and"rights to use T - of water however evidenced, and together with 1/4d h interest in the tiilliam R. Jones ditch alno together with Jones Ditch 1 and.all of .32 cubic feet of water allowed to flow therein jYr under priority No. 24. Together with all improvements thereon,`:excepting an undivid- i rr' ed 3/4ths interest in and to all ail',,gas,--and other minerals t:t'.`.4 in or under or that may he produced from-the above described property (hereby expressly granting and:'convoying aaid,i y.. ft:y. grantees herein named.,an undivided one roarth interest,in and x to all oil, gas and other minerals`in).or,urder'or'that'may be t X .'( produced from the above described property) . - r le AND WARRANT THE TITLE TO THE SAME, suhdect tor.' r Public roads and: '. ?,•'i t �S r Y ' 1((F es :,$; . .. .. c4 ''?..; J >• - t T ! ! y Y! „ ,11..,(.:.1:• l .,:',...:1, rl / 1;'1, 1 +hb, �y ' q 0222 .s- - t 1 '/}f^ ; �' t : l � r jtY + :,(f1 44/1"f ‘ l t , 1t `j'. J • If�t ..1"�1 f� t' t t c \i l iy�rM1t 1ri .'' '1-1]*::: • i\::-��, I. y� K{rr rn.�vt kY'� reyastasai4R RySy! r O, T .''}i�'-A c. { ,(' !-t 1 .[R rd.��, .�N 1R, r !- , ' beA,'" ul-aiv •alp br t'n t Y y., F � e y S ki fil', �Yi , ti i''(3..;:' ,/?1:4),..4 � : ?y t rR e v h "M1 I (,i. ' Y fir, �1 • i ' y� ��bby I,, 'p�jL.i v y or_ eaeajeents qok existing over and . $.1.0',4! r iii {I _and subject'furz5er to any, liens arising .. A 1 ! 'r - vf7�.�'.J �'f X a r F , • b d''p fmieae be1-ng .included within the bound arise i y rtf >•� � o Watar Corservancy U atriot and the`•We et flit, r My>F S7 1:.ix. y3,r}t V s t t e Y. .��. r �y ZQk',i �� ey $oiL oneerivetl on,Distr'District and subject 1'urther.to Deed ',.s•-•1;,/ `pt r 4•uer, for the')ule oT The=_Equitable-Lif-e'Assurance Society,•• �-i. originally for $12,500.00, recorded in Book,1457, -Page •d, • • . ):•.!):17,):1.:-.2ic-*I'tle41R, Weld County recorda�,,the unpaid balance of princi-pal thermionee ij as of February 1, 1957-being in then.amount of $12,084.00, which grantees herein -named, assume and agree to pay, and 1 subject further to 1957 taxes, payable in 1958. It is hereby declared u1]1 the property is conveyed in tQ joint tenancy. -„ 5lgned and delivered this 1 day of February, A. D. -, 857. • » at� sl}�c�E (SEAL) Florence C. Hahn ST;,"E cr C0 .02,:.0 ) as. COUNT! or 'atli ) The fnrejoi;..,:: in_strm,en. we •ac snowledged before me this ''h (.4Z` day of February, A. U. 1957, by i Hartin C. Nahri and Florence C. Hahn. l' WITNESS my hand and Official Seal. 4 My Cou d/-arr w 1 uaissi or: Expires: - 4 .J ( )d 1 t y ;- • 17-51t,71-6 i'ubi it ____-.- ;^; i • L3 + yy4.1 h;> L= • ��• TTTTTTf�f�f�f�f�f� .4;.••••,,'1:8.,. \• f '(� e ((.� •.r r f E\ 4 \. <y f a. . try.F . . , Planned Unit Development Change of 2one AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS MINERALS AND/OR SUBSURFACE Application No. Subject Property Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter and the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 33, Township 6 North, Range 66 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, Weld County, Colorado STATE _OF COLORADO ) ) ss. COUNTY OF WEED ) THE UNDERSItNED, being first duly sworn, -states that to the best of his ar ther knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names and addresses of all mit:.,+al owners and lenses of mineral owners on or under the parcel of land which is the subject of the application as their names appear upon the records in the Weld County Clerk and Recorder's Office, or from an ownership update from a title or _abstract company or an attorney. 7 / all The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me this / t day 9f X_O[CrLOn , 19 e-9 WITNESS my hand and official seal. My Commission expires: hcc! a� /996 � U y��hi Not Public :J 300222 TO: Affidavit of Interest Owners Mineral and/or Surface The following list is names and addresses of all mineral owners and Lessee of mineral owners on or under the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter and the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 33 , Township 6 North , Range 66 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, Weld County, Colorado: 1 . Belva Jean Von Trotha Murray 11400 Swearinger Drive Austin, Texas 7B758 2 . William and Rebecca McCalmont 127 Russell Street Manchester, New Hampshire 03104 3. Daniel and Mildred L. Buxman 30592 Weld County Road 29 Greeley, Colorado 80634 900222 AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS SURFACE ESTATE Application No. Subject Property Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter and Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 33, Township 6 North, Range 66 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, Weld County, Colorado STATE OF COLORADO ) ss . COUNTY OF WELD THE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn, states that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names , addresses and the corresponding Parcel Identification Number assigned by the Weld County Assessor of the owners of property (the surface estate) within • five hundred (500) feet of the property subject to the application. This list was compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor , or an ownership update from a title or abstract company or attorney, derived from such records , or from the records of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. The list compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor shall have been assembled within thirty (30) days _of the application submission date. The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me thifs :r 0 day 724-1,1L0Ym/ice , i9 g by �� _etA .L. 211/2,s La, WITNESS my hand and official seal . My Commission expires : L/NY /9 x,/,7,94 61, 4_ Nota Public ?CO ,22 NAMES OF OWNERS OF PROPERTY WITHIN 500 FEET Please print or type NAME ADDRESS, TOWN/CITY, ASSESSOR'S PARCEL STATE AND ZIP CODE IDENTIFICATION # 14.332 Weld County Road 64 Lowell-Paul Dairy, Inc. Greeley, Colorado 80631 080533000004 P. 0. Box 1289 Loveland Industries, Inc. Greeley, Colorado 80632 080533000086 Peggy Ann Ackard 179 South Monroe Street J. Lawrence Ackard, Trustees Denver, Colorado 80209 080533000002 Daniel Buxman 30598 Weld County Road 29 Mildred L. Buxman Greeley, Colorado 80631 080533000049 Daniel Buxman 30598 Weld County Road 29 Mildred L. Buxman Greeley, Colorado 80631 080533000050 Windon H. Davis 2730 Buena Vista Betsy Davis Greeley, Colorado 80631 080533000078 Ed Orr 801 8th Street, Suite 230 Susie Ann Orr Greeley. Colorado 80631 080533300030 760 North 71st Avenue Rine Duran Greeley, Colorado 80631 0805333300025 900222 , lA..+L 7nt*.- 3V7/9a a0_595 UENOtS: Complete Items /and 2 when additional rrvlas.re desired, and complete Items 3 and 4. Z Put your-addressin the',RETURN TO" Space on the reverse side. Failure to do-this will prevent this J card from being returned to you.—rite return receipt fee will srovide you the name of the person, rn delivered to and the date of delivery. For additional fan the following services ere available. Consult N postmaster for fess and chic kiwx(ae)for additional service(.)requested. ₹ o 1. 0 Show to whom dellvered,date,and addressee's address. 7.-0 fstrlated Delivery r- -p o_. a• Q " t(Extracharge)t f(Exileaharge)t m W8 i .a o 3. Article Addressed to: -4. Article Number LLwa a 9x'02 — &77 Rl o a, H Type of Service: m DANIEL AND MILDRED L. �UXMAN U _ Ca Z co ❑ Registered 0 Insured ft d_ H o 00 30598 WELD COUNTY ROAD 29 IRICertified ❑ COD 0 3 o I to GREELEY, CO 80634 D Express Mai n F28 GC] 0 sr7 a z 2 D-1 -Always obtain signature otaddressee iu6 y, _. —.. _—._ -- - — . _. -..— yr agent end DATE DELIVERED. x H co 4 �° S. Signature—Addressee 8. Addressee's Address(ONLY if zH Cm w g , X ,y'n-`t',,✓_ oJd✓'1/�7^'V requested and fee paid) da a 7= en 0 n> 8. Signature—Agent X 7. Da Delivery I l l� 987 / C3 S 71, 1987 / *U.S.O.RO.WI.17►M DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT 200222 Hello