HomeMy WebLinkAbout910662.tiff RESOLUTION
RE: THE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, 1991, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
PETITION OF:
BRAMBERG NELS C
921 CONIFER CT UNIT #1
WINDSOR, CO 80550
DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: PIN: R 1496786 PARCEL: 080720412004 - WIN 1WT-4
L4 WESTVIEW TOWNHOMES 1ST FILING 7,921 CONIFER CT UNIT #1%
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado,
organized as the Board of Equalization for the purpose of adjusting, equalizing,
raising or lowering the assessment and valuation of real and personal property
within Weld County, fixed and made by the County Assessor for the year 1991, and
WHEREAS, said petition has been heard before the County Assessor and due
Notice of Determination thereon has been given to the taxpayer(s) , and
WHEREAS, the taxpayer(s) presented a petition of appeal of the County
Assessor's valuation for the year 1991, claiming that the property described in
such petition was assessed too high, as more specifically stated in said
petition, and
WHEREAS, in lieu of the hearing scheduled before the Board of Equalization
a Stipulation was agreed upon by the Assessor and said petitioner(s) , and
WHEREAS, the petitioner(s) and the Weld County Assessor agree that the
assessment and valuation of the Weld County Assessor shall be, and hereby is,
stipulated as follows:
ORIGINAL ADJUSTED
Land $ 8,677 $ 4, 092
Improvements OR
Personal Property 35, 908 35,908
TOTAL ACTUAL VALUE $ 44,585 $ 40,000
WHEREAS, said Stipulation shall resolve all issues to have been determined
by the Weld County Board of Equalization.
910662
Page 2
RE: BOE - BRAMBERG NELS C
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld
County, acting as the Board of Equalization, that the Stipulation agreed to by
the Weld County Assessor and the above-named petitioner(s) be, and hereby is,
accepted by the Board.
The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded,
adopted by the following vote on the 29th day of July, A.D. , 1991.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ATTESIandaiSth WELD COUNT ORADO
Weld County Clerk to the Board
7Gor La irman
BY �E: -4 - HL a-7 —i- e
Deputy Clerk to the Ilsg.t4 G'eeo�ge Kennedy, Pro-Tem`Z/,//
APPROVED AS TO FORM: �..t." , f'�'.4-4
Constance L. Harbert
7�
A istant County Attorney C. W. Kirby
W. Webster ,.
910662
BOE DECISION SHEET
PIN #: R 1496786 PARCEL #: 080720412004
BRAMBERG NELS C
921 CONIFER CT UNIT #1
WINDSOR, CO 80550
HEARING DATE: July 18, 1991 TIME: 8:30 A.M.
HEARING ATTENDED? (Y/N) NAME:
AGENT NAME:
DECISION:
DECREASE IN VALUATION
INCREASE IN VALUATION
NO CHANGE IN VALUATION
ASSESSMENT RATIO
ACTUAL VALUATION
ORIGINAL ADJUSTED
Land $ 8677 $ � 09 Z
Improvements OR �-3
Personal Property 35908 i O
Total Actual Value $ 44585 $ °4-0 4)F,. EJ
COMMENTS:
MOTION BY TO
SECONDED BY Lacy (Y/N)
Kennedy (Y/N)
Failed to meet burden of proof Harbert (Y/N)
Comparables inadequate Kirby (Y/N)
Assessor's data unchallenged Webster (Y/N)
Other:
RESOLUTION N0. . kt (nCc Z
OFFICE OF COUNTY ASSESSOR
915 10th STREET
GREELEY,COLORADO 80631
NOTICE OF DENIAL PHONE(303)356-4000, EXT.4256
111(11?k• %921 CONIFER CT UNIT �
WIN 1 WESTVIEW
TO}NHOMES 1ST FILING
COLORADO
,t
_ c� .
MIN4OR
921 CONIFER CT 1
OWNER BRAMBERG NELS C
BRAMBERG NELS C PARCEL 08072041200"4 21
PIN R 1496786
us
921 CONIFER CT UNIT 111
YEAR 1991
WINDSOR CO 80550 LOG 00561
05/07/1991
The appraised value of property is based on the appropriate consideration of the approaches to value required by law.The Assessor has determined
that your property should be included in the following category(ies):
Residential property is valued by considering the cost and market approaches.
Agricultural land value is determined solely by the earning or productive capacity of the land,capitalized at a rate set by law.
Producing mines are assessed at 25%of the gross proceeds or 100% of the net proceeds,whichever is greater.
Oil and gas leaseholds and lands are assessed at 87.5% of the gross value of the oil and/or gas sold or transported from the premises on
primary production;secondary production is valued at 75%.
All other property, including vacant land,is valued by considering the cost, market,and income approaches.
If your concern is the amount of your property tax, local taxing authorities (county, city, fire protection, and other special districts) hold
budget hearings in the fall. Please refer to your tax bill or ask your Assessor for a listing of these districts,and plan to attend these budget hearings.
The Assessor has carefully studied all available information, giving particular attention to the specifics included on your protest and has deter-
mined the valuation(s) assigned to your property.The reasons for this determination of value are:
YOUR PROPERTY HAS BEEN UNIFORMLY VALUED FOLLOWING COLORADO LAW AND
INSTRUCTIONS PUBLISHED BY THE STATE DIVISION OF PROPERTY TAXATION.
YOUR, PROTEST OF VALUE HAS BEEN DENIED DUE TO COMPARISON OF OTHER
SINILAR PROPERTIES WHICH SOLD DURING THE 1989/1990 TIME PERIOD•
THIS COMPARISON SHOWS YOUR ACTUAL PROPERTY VALUE TO BE CORRECT FOR
THAT PERIOD.
PETITIONER'S ASSESSOR'S VALUATION
PROPERTY CLASSIFICATION ESTIMATE ACTUAL VALUE ACTUAL VALUE
OF VALUE PRIOR TO REVIEW AFTER REVIEW
LAND 83677 83677
IMPS 353908 353908
TOTALS $ $ 443585 $ 443585
If you disagree with the Assessor's decision,you have the right to appeal to the County Board of Equalization for further consideration,
39-8.1061111a1,C.R.S. Please see the back of this form for detailed information on filing your appeal.By:
WARREN L. LASELL 05/16/91 ��-PicZCZtftd
9 _
WELD COUNTY ASSESSOR DATE 18
15-DPT-AD _____. _ A nrtyr IA•In, . Lear n DALAS lrMartM Otl/CDPrsr __._. _. _
YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO APPEAL THE ASSESSOR'S DECISION
The County Board of Equalization will sit to hear appeals beginning July land continuing through August 10 for
real property (land and buildings) and personal property(furnishings, machinery, and equipment). 39-8-104 and
39-8-107(2), C.R.S.
APPEAL, PROCEDURES:
If you choose to appeal the Assessor's decision, marl or deliver one copy of this completed form to the County
Board of Equalization. To preserve your right to appeal, your appeal must be POSTMARKED OR DELIVERED ON
OR BEFORE JULY 15.
WELD COUNTY BOARD OF EQUALIZATION -I •_ ;
• • - 915 10th Street, P.O. Box 758 r�
:. ' ;;-,
- : • Greeley, Colorado 80632 - =
Telephone (303) 356-4a00, Ext. 4225 -"
NOTIFICATION OF HEARING: _ -. " " - •
•
You will be notified of the time and place set for the hearing of your appeal.
t.•.l
COUNTY BOARD OF EQUALIZATION'S bETEMIINATION: N
The County Board of Equalization must make a decision on your appeal and mail you a determination within five
business days. The County Board must conclude their hearings by August 10.
TAXPAYER RIGHTS FOR FURTHER APPEALS:
If you are not satisfied with the County Board of Equalization's decision, you must file within thirty days of the
County Board of Equalization's decision to ONE of the following:
Board of Assessment Appeals (BAA):
Contact the BAA at 1313 Sherman, Room 315, Denver, Colorado 80203, (303) 866-5880.
District Court:
9th Avenue and 9th Street, P.O. Box C
Greeley, Colorado 80632
telephone (303)356-40011 Ext. 4520 ,
• • ' ' � A'rbitration: •
VVELO COUNTY BOARD QF EQUALIZATION - • .
915 1O1 Street, p.0. Box 758 ,
Greeley, Colorado 80632
Telephone (303) 356-4000, Ext. 4225
If you do not receive a determination from the County Board of Equalization,you must file an appeal with the Board
of Assessment Appeals by September 18.
TO PRESERVE YOUR APPEAL RIGHTS, YOU MUST PROVE YOU HAVE FILED A TIMELY APPEAL;
THEREFORE, WE RECOMMEND ALL CORRESPONDENCE BE MAILED WITH PROOF OF MAILING.
PETITION TO THE COUNTY BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
In the space below, please explain why you disagree with the Assessor's valuation.Attach additional documents as
'neci4ssary. • :
✓ b- 2- G.6/i l 5
C� � � y
j�,.,"6,)()<<
1 • •
SItNATURE OF PETITIONER DATE
Ct5IUtN i IAL AlierKAI,A�ntreL. vn• • - '
Property Description IL Analysis UNIF-' � F LENDER DISCRE?IONARv USE
Census Tract .
=operty Address ' Onl er OUr State CO Zip Code Sale Price $
city Windsor county Weld Date
Legal Description 10 W- '--w •L•• - - is Mort Amount $
Map Reference , - • Mortgage Owner/Occupant Gram.- _ " - -
t.. Sale Price PROPERTY RIGHTS APPRAISED Mortgage Type
a Refire. Date of Sale I x I Fee Simple Discount Points and Other Concessions
Loan chargcharges/concessions to be paid by seller $ Leasehold Paid by Seller $
R.E.Taxes$ 617 Tax Year HOA S/Mo. 7 Condominium(HUD/VA)
Lenderownt Fireman's Fund Mortgage Corp. n De Minimis PUD Source
r � U Suburban I I Rural NEIGHBORHOOD ANALYSIS Good Avg. Fair
LOCATION WC Over n 25.75% Under 25% Employment Stability x 1 -
BUILT UP U Over 75% IIII II
GROWTH RATE ❑Rapid Fn Stable in Slow Convenience to Employment ❑ x
Increasing In Stable 7 Declining Convenience to Shopping X
Ill
jPROPERTY VALUES n n Over SuDPIY Convenience to Schools ❑ U
DEMAND/SUPPLY ❑Shortage In In Balance Y P n U
n&6 Mos. �I Over 6 Mos. Adequacy of Public Transportation I I I X I
MARKETING TIME �I Under 3 Mos. PREDOMINANT SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING Recreation Facilities In
PRESENT LAND USE % LAND USE CHANGE OCCUPANCY PRICE AGE Adequacy of Utilities ❑ U IIII
Fr
• Single Family 90 Not Likely >d $(000) (yrs) Property Compatibility X Mill
Mui Family 70 In pro ❑ Owner ❑X 60 Low 8 Protection from Detrimental Cond. 7 Lx"f1 s
Multi-fatuity In process ❑ Tenant Koh Police 6 Fire Protection ❑ i n• Commercial To: Vacant (0.5%) n _ 80 0 12
MI IIII
Vacant(over 5°%)T1 Predominant Genetal Appearance of Properties I X I
Industrial 70 _ 10 Appeal to Market n
Vacant
Note. Race or the racial composition of the neighborhood are not considered reliable appraisal factors.
COMMENTS Young residential development of moderate single family dwellings and multi-familv
condos, townhanes and duplexes convenient to schools, shopping, employment regionally.
Topography Level @ street grade
Dimensions Approx. 5. x 115 Corner Lot No Size Minimal, adequate
Site Area Abon 5.750 Shape Rectangular
Zoning Classification PUD Zoning Compliance Yes
Other Use No Drainage Surface
HIGHEST 8 BEST USE Present Use Yes Public Private View None
UTILITIES Public Other SITE IMPROVEMENTS Type x n Landscaping Poor sod
Electricity X 1 Street Co Driveway Concrete
Curb/Gutter Concrete LX-J Apparent Easements Typical PUE
Gas X x ❑
Water I X Sidewalk Concrete x I FEMA Flood Hazard Yes' No x
n
Sanitary Sewer b- 7Street Lights Yes FEMA' Map/Zone
Storm Sewer Alley NO n
COMMENTS(Apparent adverse easements.encroachments,special assessments,slide areas, etc.):
No adverse conditions observed. Surrounding properties are compatible.
Founds
I FOUNDATION BASEMENT INSULATION
_ GENERAL DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION Slab Area Sq. Ft N/A Roof I I
Units 1 Foundation C ncrete
%Finished Ceiling I x I
Crawl Space Yes
Stories 2 Exterior Walls Sheet Walls X
- Type(Del./Att.) Att. Roof Surface As h.Sh 1. Basement Ceiling L—
Sump Pump Walls Floor
- Design(Style) 2rStorV Gutters 8 Dwnspis. Metal None U
Window-T a A1t,ml.2- Dampness Floor
Existing Yes Outside Entr Adequacy
Proposed Storm Sash No Settlement Y Energy Efficient Items.
Under Construction Screens Yes Infestation
Age(Yrs.) 10 Manufactured House No
Effective '•- (Yrs.) 0
ROOMS Foyer Living Dining Kitchen Den Family Rm, Rec. Rm. Bedrooms 0 Baths Laundry Other Area Sq. Ft.
Basement i 480
Level t �,_ INFO' 480
. Level �--- 1 10 et
•
UC area above grade contains: Rooms; 2 Bedroom(s); 1', Bath(s): 960 Square Feet of Gross Living Area
SURFACES Ma
SURFACES Materials/Condition HEATING KITCHEN EQUIP. ATTIC IMPROVEMENT ANALYSIS Good Avg Fa.. Pcci
Floors Crpt/Vnyl F-A TYDe FA Bettie atm None I Quality of Construction [X I I I I
Walls DV1 " Fuel Range;Oven (� Stairs Condition of Improvements I X I
• Trim/Finish Stained " Condition Avg- Disposal I x I Drop stan n Room Sizes/Layout I X
Bain Floc VyTyyl Adequacy �, Dishwasher I x I Scuttle j x I Closets and Storage IIxIL Li E11
- Bath Wainscot - ,,„ ' " COOLING Avg, Fan/Hood Lxj Floor n Energy Efficiency U ❑l
• Doors BILIghw " Central Compactor El Heated in Plumbing-Adequacy 8 Condition ! xi
Veneer kit. Cab's AVE. Dther Washer/DryerU Finished In Electrical-Adequacy 8 Condition IXI I 1
Li
_ Caxlitbn Microwave n n Kitchen Cabinets-Adequacy 8 Cond.' I I x l I I L L
•tic •1 It • • - Adequac Intercom In IN Compatibility to Neighborhood I X I I
FiAR STOTT, Pr'P—F:
Adequate ' ouse Entry � Appeal& Marketability I X I I XI �
CAR STOR:. iarage � Attached � � 45 Vis
NG. Cars arport n Detached n Inadequate El Outside Entry Ix I Estimated Remaining Economic Life
Condition done Ell Buitt-In II Electric Door IIII easement Entr III Estimated Remaini • Ph sical Lile x a Yrs.
Additional te:. .•= I • - • . -.• -• •.. ..1 =.a• • • ' a. - - .1Il ar, • -• , e
Depreciation r, unctional and external inadequacies,repairs needed.modernization.etc.)'.
,• "1 11 worn. above what is common for its ape.
. . • •: • - --• co,.• ❑a . • • - CAI•.,n,- -
• Gei,-- •e1 dons and prevalence ard•k0act in subject/malice regarding loan discounts,interest buydowns and concessions
swill Rail rill rural town i v a bedroom m rgin -11 .. -• '- •
Ft. Collins, Loveland employment.
',eao,e Mac Form)0 10/e6 1zCr1. CL Forme SW.yun me My•_716 NrZt a...- , La M..• 2! .0,662_.,
et-5 5
rte. .0,y
vNuallon Section ` rtururain f{t.7rs R Ja: I IN i. Aret%AlbAL fStrtil•L I Fit. No.
Purpose bf Appraisal is to estimate Market Value as defined in the Certification 8 Statement of Limiting Conditions.
BOLDING SKETCH(SHOW GROSS LIVING AREA ABOVE GRADE) ESTIMATED REPRODUCTION COST-NEW-OF IMPROVEMENTS:
N kx Freaae mac or Fan use.aids or*ease soot cataators and cost acoreech comments in"In.pace. Dwelling 960 sq.R.a$ 34.O0 =$ 32,640
i 16 x 30 x 2 = 960 sq.ft. Extra Appliances
$ = 1,000
i Fireplace = 1,�_
Special Energy Efficient Hems —
Porctles,Patios,etc. Slab = 200
I. Garage/Carport 190 sq. FL® $ 14.00 m 2 660
Cost data based on AVERAGE quality Total Estimated Cost New =$ 3�7 500 .
factors from cost manual. Pfrysical Functional Extemal
Less
i Depreciation 3,000 -- 5,000 = $ 8.000 ,
Depreciated Value of Improvements = $ 29,500
Site Imp."as is"(driveway,landscaping,etc.) _$ 2,000 -
ESTIMATED SITE VALUE — $ 7.000 ,
(It leasehold, show only leasehold value.)
IMMCATED VALUE BY COST AMOUR = $ 38,500
(Not Required by Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae) rr--��lIJ Construction Warranty L.]Yes Lx]No
E
Does property conform to applicable HUD/VA property standards? Q Yes No Name of Warranty Program .
e No,explain: Warranty Coverage Expires
The undersigned has/Bated three recent sales of properties most similar and proximate to subject and has considered these in the market analysis.The desorption includes a della
adjustment,reflecting market reaction to those items of significant venation beheen the subject and comparable properties.If a significant item in the comparable PrinITY is supremo
to,or more favorable than,the subject property,a minus(—)adjustment is made.thus reducing the indicated value of subject,it a significant item in the comparable is inferior tc,
or less favorable than,the subject property,a plus(+)adjustment is made.thus increasing the indicated value of the subject.
ITEM SUBJECT COMPARABLE NO. 1 COMPARABLE NO.2 COMPARABLE NO.3
Address 921 Conifer Ct. #1 5701 W. 18th Street 2413 W. 27th Street 815 37th Avenue -
Proximity to Subject I I I I II II II I Greeley Greeley Greeley _
Sales Price s Refin. JIIIIIIII 111111 i_I I I$45,500 J I I III. $36t000 J11111111 I III III I fi I$34 500
Price/Gross Liv. Area $N/A 0 $34.16 mll1IjIIIIllIllIIIIIIIIIIII. $39.13 m11fi1_II Ilfifillllll $32.21 mIll11IIHII L_ li L
Data Source Inspection Agent/MLS/Pub.Rec. Agent/MLS/Pub.Rec. Agent/MLS/Pub.Rec.
VALUE ADJUSTMENTS DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION I •(-js Adjustment DESCRIPTION I .(-)s Adustment DESCRIPTION I •(-IS ad'Btmen
Sales or Financing liIIIII w CV,Concessions IUWI o Seller Pts. = Cash = Cash =
Date of Sale/Time 9/90 8/90 = 8/90 = 7/90 = _
Location Avg. Res. Similar = Similar = Similar =
Site/View FairYrd/Fnce Avg/Smaller = Avg/Smaller = Avg/Smaller =
Design one Appeal ,2Sty/Avg. Same = SBtlle = Satre = -
Ouality of Construction AVg.Frame Better -2,000 Same Same =
Age 1980 1982 ) 1 �p 1980 1 1000 1977 ) _
Condition Below Avg. Good ) Good ) Avg. )
Above Grade Total ;Bdmis i Baths Total ;Urns; Baths Total ;Bdrms; Baths Total ;Bdims; Baths
Room Count 4 ; 2 ; 1% 6 ; 3 ; 1'4 4 ; 2 ; 14 5 ' 2 ; 1;
Gross Living Area 960 Sq.Ft. 1,332 Sq.Ft. —5,000 920 Sq.Ft. + 500 1,071 $q. Ft. —1,000
Basement 8 Finished x 454 half avg.
Rooms Below Grade Crawl Same = finish —4,000 525 Unfin. —3,000
I--
Functional Utility Avg. Satre _ dame = Same = _
Heating/Cooling FA Same = Same = Same =
Garage/Carport 1—Car (Same = None • +2,500 Carport-2 +1,500 _
Porches,Patio,
Pools,etc. Slab Same = Same = Same _
Special Energy
Efficient Items None Same = Same = Same _
Fkeplace(s) Pre—Fab Same = Same = Same =
Other (e.g.kitchen
equip.,remodeling) R0 DW HF,Ds-D_,5ame = Same = /Same =
Net Adj. (total) _ f- + _X—'$ 8,000 + x $ 2,000 -'$ 2,500
Indicated Value 1� I III
of Subject I 1 $ 37,500 J $ 34,000 �W L. _$ 32.000
I Comments on Sales Comparison: Cc op.I. # and Knolls deve]opment. #2 in Stephens- #3 in Frlmards
ill
I IMOICATEO VALUE B1 SALES COQARSON APPROACH $ 39„GO()
fl IIMICATEO VALUE BY INCOME AROOACM(V Applicable)Estimated Market Rem$ -- NO.x Gross Rent Multiplier — _ S N/A
This appraisal is made ® "as is"El subject to the repairs,alterations,inspections or conditions listed below n completion per plans and specifications.
Comments and Conditions of Appraisal: COst Approach has little anFliacabili ty to arnhiect And i a A poor
t measure_of market value in a depresged market.
1 Final Reconciliation. MUCH consideration is also given to S35.000 . July 1990, sale of a condaninium
at 909 Conifer Ct. : and to S90.000. FEbruary 1990. sale of the other three units in subject's
four—T- x.
This% Is based upon the above requirements,the certification,contingent and limiting conditions,and Markel Value definition that are stated in
i 1 .A E./or VA instructions.
i---
L2 Aac Form 439(Rev 7/86)/Fannie Mae Form 10048(Rev.7/86)filed with Ghent 19_ X attached.
I (Y -ATE THE MARKET VALUE, AS REFINED, OF THE SUBJECT MIO►ERTY AS OF September 24 lO 90 b Re$ 35,000
• I iv l"y gnat to the best of my(our)knowledge and belief the facts and data used herein are true and correct,that I(we)personally inspected the subject property,both
u oa. and nave an exterior mspe lire raA comparable sales tiled in this report.and that I(we)have no undisclosed interest.present or prospective therein.
- k _ __
r/ REVIEW APPRAISER
2.--4-x-Cy 'aopbcaWei SgnaP.Ire Did Did NoI
�' Craig Fazr, RM ` N_ Inspect Property
Ode Mac Form 70 10/86 72Ca. /orals grid won*Inc`3:5 WTI,at Me. Nfr�Have.a,C' V.si 1 1(B.,Na 3.4s c uC.1 FapvP...‘..../11:44;t3;--.
Aae F,ar�r tp6� 10/86
_. _. _ _... _ ,tea
-2..'i.:44;t3 r;.d
•
l • • 6
\ CL CLERK TO THE BOARD
P.O. BOX 758
' GREELEY,COLORADO 80832
C. (303)3584000 EXT.4225
COLORADO •
July 8, 1991
Parcel No. : 080720412004 PIN No. : R 1496786
BRAMBERG NELS C
921 CONIFER CT UNIT 111
WINDSOR, CO 80550
Dear Petitioner(s) :
The Weld County Board of Equalization has set a date of Thursday, July 18,
1991, at or about the hour of 8:30 A.M. , to hold a hearing on your
valuation for assessment. This hearing will be held at the Weld County
Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado, in the First Floor
Hearing Room.
You have a right to attend this hearing and present evidence in support of
your petition. The Weld County Assessor will be present before the Board.
The Board will make their decision on the basis of the record made at the
aforementioned hearing, as well as your petition, so it would be in your
interest to have a representative present. If you plan to be represented
by an agent or an attorney at your hearing, prior to the hearing you shall
provide, in writing to the Clerk to the Board's Office, an authorization
for the agent or attorney to represent you. If you do not choose to
attend this hearing, a decision will still be made by the Board by the
close of business on August 10, 1991, and mailed to you on or before
August 16, 1991.
Because of the volume of cases before the Board of Equalization, all cases
shall be limited to 15 minutes. Also due to volume, cases cannot be
rescheduled. It is imperative that you provide evidence to support your
position. This may include evidence that similar homes in your area are
valued less than yours or you are being assessed on improvements you do
not have. Please note: The fact that your valuation has increased cannot
be your sole basis of appeal . Without documented evidence as indicated
above, the Board will have no choice but to deny your appeal.
BRAMBERG NELS C - R 1496786
Page 2
At least two (2) working days prior to your hearing the Assessor will have
available, at your request, the data supporting his valuation of your
property.
Please advise me if you decide not to keep your appointment as scheduled.
If you need any additional information, please call me at your
convenience.
Very truly yours,n OF BO44/4/(� U ZV'I/ GLl/GG'„117
Donald D. Warden,
Clerk to the Board •
Carol A. Harding, Deputy �L
cc: Warren Lasell, Assessor
04 it fr "
rr
_ 1991
BOARD-OF EQUALIZATION
WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
ASSESSOR'S PIN NUMBER 1496786
STIPULATION (As to Tax Year 1991 Actual Value)
RE PETITION OF
NAME: NELS C. BRAMBERG
ADDRESS: 921 CONIbhR CT
WINDSOR CO 80550
Petitioner(s) , NELS C. BRAMBERG
and the Weld County Assessor, hereby enter into this Stipulation regarding
the tax year 1991 valuation of the subject property, and jointly
move the Board of Equalization to enter its order based on this
Stipulation.
The Petitioner(s) and the Assessor agree and stipulate as follows:
1. The property subject to this Stipulation is described as:
LOT 4 .WESTVIEW TOWNHOMES 1ST FILING
2. The subject property is classified as TOWNHOUSE
property (what type).
3. The County Assessor originally assigned the following actual
value on the subject property for tax year 1991
Land $ 8,676 ✓ Q 6 `1 '7
Improvements $ 35,908 3S� 9O
Total $ 44,584 ✓ 4 z-gs
4. After further review and negotiation, the Petitioner(s) and Weld
County Assessor agree to the following tax year 1991 actual value
for the subject property:
Land $ 4,092
Improvements $ 35,908
Total $ 40,000
5. The valuations, as established above, shall be binding only with
respect to tax year 1991 •
910.662
r
6. Brief narrative as to why the reduction was made:
REAPPRAISAL - PHYSIgAL INSPECTION
7. Both parties agree that the hearing scheduled before the Board of
Equalization on JULY 18, 1991 (date) at 8:30 a.m.
(time) be vacated; or, a hearing has not yet been scheduled before the
Board of Equalization (check if appropriate) .
DATED this 17 day of JULY 1991.
Petitioner(s) or Attorney 1 Petitioner(s) or Attorney
Address: Address:
C'7 t (bab Vi/f1 (1+�4 r
Telephone: LAP6 lic(LE-) Telephone:
(7/01�1 /\-
V" I
County Assessor
915 Tenth Street
Greeley, CO 80631
(303) 356-4000, Extension 4256
Oi r
..e- _i:
Hello