The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About920298.tiff r • CI O Q rn oc� h CI rti 2 --...............L7....___ w E . .CI Qt C) pOQ p Q �'� o V O ` ! r; ; sa o . DO � O ` � - pp � It ,s p0Z : N Ni W `` � U ar pp IJMZ Q QV It,.%1 O a x i :41.1! � N WZ y ph � 'VOk � � NI N O phi DA �C. s It O 1' t (2; 1 M i W e. Z W • M 03>4 " V . irm- iI}. 1p ...____ iN..11i.Jrie3.00 S4 8 93S fi/I 3N 3N171 S d3 _ 11 _ b ° `� si 8 .0 I! ' t'r-- d590fi :::::1) as a il ^� W_ Z£'g�' O Q3 I �` wow U cy # 3.117.pe.OON ph pp W Cc '4;4 °°o� � 3 �•o II It � dq ty `V (� Q 0 aO m17 k InO � � U � J N.. .4 LuIn J J y Z ° E . e 1, , r, ~ EC N V m ft , g ct k. Q P la 1 it 0 (ii § Ott 00 � � rem S7 Op �� Lt.- -..1 l..... In 0 o CI, 0 0 �+lr �# Qj M p OO Q 0m WMN aQ ■■ . • N o • • 9 ui .I9'$9i i 1/fi,t'd•00 S V C7 0' � 2tk4 kiti -61 Qiii- c.,6 opt 5• 0p � M o 11ip a . .0. •�,, a ., .... ,,,, ,. w . CO Z c Chi to !1 X `a� • o as a4'ire 58 4 Wi o 7i •\i v�a� a MN 41 �x� t;iq h a o z O co p 000 U��J o.HR x Wm w pi �2 °5H_ :s o '�S h b tr, Opc� ►o. g li 1mia 2m z • F Utfl00 O .Iii w ii wS al ~141 liu3 o` er �h 1.4 _II1:4 rDeG4 4H1 ZNo rwr w rHnw rpsaN v s1r m V wx }r C 0 ~ x •!.�•t r I O m F tri t•w mpp �xyHQ ati F .7 w a L x Oiipa.I pra J. 7i�M x •S >� i� Q v to �} I• d' ~ t•w Cy) !u In AM oDa w!•m F 1 g O N rC A '■It w p�C 3O 4MM tA n.p aip E•60•.-• t;41 re r eel D w ..q D W m• w 0 40 'Q' H ~ �1 co �� ' 0 O X s� mo QQ4 b. R «� zOMEW h ir.w Z� 0 �U►r NI "Cig 4 i ;+Oi Aa(uA 11 om CD I, V p414 U O P rtrtFtt !a�s . O ©'♦N4oI tpp�� gra:44. .i[+C t4Ei i�. I M t;i E+o •.a a Aa p�E a tHii a z E p. • a4 M ai W IE E+E�� to m ki W E I_ P1147r.a.• O Is:r o�t • 4xE atO � s O m a m . 4 m� g "4 J �} cc. In N -- 4 . .xh� - °�+°{mN 1211 aHn spaax a xo »aE zaeaict- w ...r eo E - E.�y h q .l O O X � Ogg Nh I. NL] +l4 hmii mqgm • a W O L+ A .tq M••• A4 u MOO o• • c*HEO o NNw WD pp oo r� c 46 `cii O E f+ [l O Sa o+H•43E VN'4 Cr) U ^ �F m as • m v o o a.o•.rc m z • da of rq e•I �D aI. Near. a.y O 1011:o z� ZD P oto Net ax�o" ors° o c3H 4 °° HHOOZ7�: 0 ��'''' • w HOZ 18Z .Om2Ama MHO 114 ~40c\i rCH CH�rOA 14 � �� \ tt ,t� �� ..mtap a DO m4E4 D. HU IMO tu cz J co O Lu z " • q aD V.i O 06 E Ll Y R.?+ S q 1A-1 E • m), VIII ��ySi Ld QoCOr tJA7aa Z 00U �'pW�xpwy rt V et cti X e, 1211 .VE.-. um.m Ill aZ05p.ixe0p . x4 • t 4VJ xE HZ OVEa4i J W _ ro e�14•.o.' xo �-esaoAv xWa 'tN ..zm o2a 1" x �' O r.141gl 11 ol: rR ►1r?•W 4I� +4 S.z ` r Q ~ R� E i 11.IO t•• E• M meat-. V el-Nom 00" o t>s i '•'E+ ••► V r. 4•7 A4 M r• • •M N Z 4 'V �+p� OOW J y `I' �.�0 eO+f Opt > O F6+tA Z..\. him w NZIA �ofrid a. E Ipl j top ax I� O V Q # ^ v00 m Nano 044 xZO Um m0 6'0+14 grin' A Afi� S>. z2V Ili o OQ ZJ � X � Q O Vtot j Lib 0 • J J W k Nix.iv) Cri O El a M O .HC c x ei +'n I as in N QIQ (:3,48 TA 8 4"k ri • r4 t E N v+ .ti ul rq 11 - s OC 82 1 Z QS Ki *.•••• HN S. Fr) V �z� vo'�i II" El • acn o�I z wS t° sty ! u 0 » mca n a �+ c�a �i am w at '�c� at4� O xx za, aa W o •: u+ x at o >t� o ox Pzxwa _ N �? Z O (% o 4oa Mgt xWa ' 4� ow g 4I a4 m ISEn liai<. n V gx m'•m E...A+ >. a .e aas m v as Al ra Dro OOo CO IC) J �. O O Q .K xvm�• x ado: a .earl cmn "�; re`�a Ha' H awavH H � V `' giqC VCO 6 •°•A.eA ,Ot•iO I.. 7., O EOM p�►"�a •.GG HO O14O go o riO¢ o>rr t�•t V 0 O 1422 �j�a !err. o0 r ot� eg .Oi. .NO . g 0 F h � AiE� a IZIliqt iiiiit t...41 1 J • .+x Rrl••4 H a c� r�ea it eac as • �io Q. M O s4e a$$r �c2. x cs rya°grO+o 0°za�x ofD�t•1• t� co . nl I N z Htgaa ON�t a mil aa�onip, o►i aoa a. E• oRVM+rExu K. \+ D w 0 at o... .. h o O m o M 0 0 +e t E+ .1•.. i4+ p Q 00 pp •woH e•eA.a :a Ica; •� 314 014 o r > b�'' •f�•OR co coIlm0 t O a •+ONGRi as4 w; aa N •4uaxa► c; 8 �q Yom.•► rlM8.02mOA co C Nam QE•14 .-1i�i W NR.r7 m � Nw N A•� NAs.� `�. co) co elvi. O V p u \ M V �i O j mm ooz a ri g .. • hi0 4 O �• to Arimm s Goo 0t hi7 ?i >,O�H hix H E+• .�+cmreto x l� fii Ni CJ F+ m pm Wx Vl .C HEIiiii CI) h p L �+ 0 O ? • a K� � °� ppWHm tqn�atn4 m 4o >,nvHt+H�� 0 V Jp .i mA pSeei �y a. t7p �rS 14wl » »A'�d » 5 wx • r4 ki kp CZ p V 5r�1a4�. 1450 • +•,C ?O. 26 107 : pay • 76O.ati •.r 6ifq • • Ir.w +O1 7:01) U in k. ` W k! VIP; m N h oA aaNEl.oam rva a. ia,mrl.lx�pc H1�pG, e� . ct�' (� .a 1::5 55m � mER. ~N9n;f�i.={5t •-a >ow-e�oA�.-Sao-� tfso!�Oieo�►: + r•` E: . o ONa ++a Y+n e.,•• xoa.oao Y+u..'.'EZWA' . - ♦ e•opp a1 r+a 21.22W.4:14 mo.�D hD •hI.ltAhh40 +••! Z•r y CJ xa. • d ..• uoes• Veto• Laoe H�ii • eON J O O � 5iEW O� flg. W +• W .o •oO•lo+O �o.ren .e►Aoao �.rx• tx• ' �O r� NE D \O 0zo.t W of�k•CA0 4�► .a1I�N.rm •o .� 'emsrCOONa•QO �� .ig1 4 ��wOCt •� Nilextmzm •1 •14 L7rAa00�w10E•�QQiLO•LJo4gkit!�0g0dl5rq+CCS�C4s .e as U 1464 0a C9Fip7 + •DtOA RiD.'i'.Z~ +.'�zM +.'7u7LAHCZ0a am�'T,E Nai• rez- J _ .6£'£Z£I iI�l.,�tr',�6e7v00_S - — ca a ..sr `dd oa a.$�.�s� aare �M,sDwtadatnma,.exSi�aowa�MoN c) K NI Z//'�'# bl�/� crskrt, 68 ,73S S N Q ohy�m x Aca a tn�.o E. orS�o.EcoSmHa oo +o ca 1t . 0 5zh14 A av aae�v OwE+ W'�' aa[�•Apa>�•rat�raOwa a� 4 lsauw: NI-34r � O c., \ 0 4 Z » a3xm1. u9ila-1L9uT. � UOT,muis �3thmam• 1 m. Ia+�Zllr7Selokia.1 . .aHZ� [mq�> AaM p145:14 +tN rOmpLWRa> •o •�140 ��qO14Nm� AOCR. Z ( 4N0 uhrO-IH „ vH1HHm., >f<AIoCHOHOietEoe•H .>4ElROE•ruOpl IL C) ...... . tF H p E+ W W N.� III Wr►�n :i.^.. +ne.y .i4aawiit4a7ZLu �. - a U , A r • x • • npG�O I .e } zX.Otrfxu •Z+t5i� OWm �� a on ��. uw oaWo ~3E~ Lit o‘.Q J O N: .„... J (3) O - . . • iwitati, i.. O Q Clip •44...\ ci4.3CID . ) [j(!il =1Y0 vr1 4.12 ■eaiMA.I • MIt. • •. .• of V S ..•w w a •-•a . * 11 ail . .. 63 r x • a c t 1` w ct k , o. k ....0: iii41 ...:.ti.6:::: v 1 ;u1 1"; •!1* egel .01 (f) ct C...) tea. islilli 21Viii 1 ili P. I. ti ! • "ill : 1":11 1: - d• • « g ~ 6ACOM !ii149"11f+�e awlA� w _' 4iA� * a�' MAIt . 7 .a V il 7, - i • flI•; j M s▪ " .a a �« aA r •� akQ.. ...., O» w =. i wa: $e1 w a �r • G"'„ u j A 1 111:11 Liari I,IIII I� r M • 1��T s � y � �+ a�•Q Q S $ .I o o' 4216w a •u w •Q �Q «� N. CyM m A� r ~ .�• �. A w.^•11 41 .1 fl. A Vm ,FAN NA �+ Q r� II% l I .'��I 141" . 14g '"'"4 " + � �f.� r �d •Oe w droti,(1) 1%** 11%.,,c\I Lull's"' O V AZ Sri A•V » • ... .. 3 .4 , g.„4 "� CX �� O aware,. � L' Igo V r O w nip .111 O r• 7 6.M w •+ im..***4 Lata. A 3► aQC, ear ► . i� " • " '' '' 4. 11.i] l !ii � $ggx°' � gA6 gq� QV • ~ r • .�i .•'1 " � ti=14Y: 3 O u r 2 .+F1 O Nj " r 6� a � �� wN �rR Q� O O `` L' -4 �+ .+ �e s+.• .. w r .c a w u :514t ! w •s r �i l� M r`r �M a. A r r •'� 4 �; .. i � .+ 'r� ~pnrolCC I.. V" x p vJ ,,. O •wr • a �•�� i rO qn"y o "I •OCta Q � MN � •.off a w.. . � ea • Ir e vv m� a.`. w O O Q Mar . *1 w o M A �• .+ .A:a » • JI ; r .1a r : .•6p+ .+ � • .. •' p M ->• _ '+ [1 f1� y 1r2 z; 4 1 '• .p. A1$W ■ r ~ •wi Q..vFaas ae nOo�rerwi a ti Oy ~ .. uM Ct t} 141 \6 CI "l .•'•t!h i~ .. . .1r 'I Ilia ,•o� „/ ra� .g ::s� . quLw w 1 2 7 . ; g V ..v M.�Q • • Zi r�✓ .rr ww .rirea� o •I ;Pall M� SMii li ir 4k--"Illillib IIR 11%... O » o to «ss�co oea•u D >In• a�'� yrs ii Z...11 il NM) co� N O .0.4„, cli. -43V . a u ,o d w 0 x ,. �. as ., ti Ct . X �. (r) J J - w \ cil Ca % III '' �` N. 3 ► •`� �y ;1. Esllll!j.r' 1 dt \ /�.. i ;iii.' �I 'a l ( ��> ..1 , i .—;- .. ct co COI X _____...___„TNITNI \\ C'r)` E.27. ,.\ worm CO ),. co, cis • 141 ` p i . \J -�� -.•a•• ° t .': , 1_'-, : 4*.P•gp.. .. . list ...I. k co '� �' �... ' as ��°�`"� „.. k `V I N.: (O -,ilk '---rIVI• IT '";•;"- "r-'''•••itsA .iity ' \ • 1` W W • Illik 5�� ,e' C.' _•,,A.+`� • ) ri i �ti' ••y •am 1 IIIIIA-lit..... i,.... !st• -O 1' :b I. •krib..4-4 dh'e.`. ,';.. ..;,. -. , s . , 1 t• -. w.r % 44ik tp,ip$'' I ,.' 03 /A.'',‘ ;'. : Tr. • , I . , , :Eit fiyi7 V O ct O �� "7 „-I ;'•/II £#. . =o/Yte� NV4,o 1 "' •• ' �• kN ii, c : . 44 4','''' ,-1 : . );y.,1:isl Atli '-'-k\ .,.1 ::.: i-,•:.1L; ri i7:* CD NI. - ,: Ilii.:4 . ' li.4.' Irt.i..taIN'Ill - ,,,.., ,---S ...._ NJ � � Z v0 •.., b ctto Q V 00t• . . : �j a .� I ��, r-I O • [ M ~ h co+W V t. ~ - CS Q CO =?�� rl + xN • 1i- 1 /-)) • . .. ., -, . .„.,._..,;.,4 i. ? ,, ... 0 k cr) L. 07/ / — — — „,„ . . , ' • . . --_;------ r ,.,,, c.,,,,, ,....,x, . o �''"� ,Zrs 9Bll A, 2.8£000 N dl* /7 r IftillilliWil:H Io z .02'611 ,./ . ' -I Acklf.,. .: a :3,Ze?8£e00S 8 '.)3S t�//�61N.3NI71S3M ` .' /( r .i' Aft illikili ........),, / CC4 J W }� rVC*:.,..1 A 3�lls '3• rl#IY_ •. ..' r• y - ' •.•ry r-' �>=:v, r W •• ta V Q U Ct LL 1 f r /..''iztw EL J o o — ..e -.-a . %. ,� . .b . / iN.. Ni. ci C.S � w 0 � p (5 hZ � acq '-' OOQ tow VtpO QOZ M W - ! WHO � z � � N � I` N op 4 U a m ho`', cq rel a r1 rU • w ._____..___�____-____._._...-.�..-.___..� _..____-_-....____....v�,_-_.�.__. ._._14._14 �_- __. . _. ._ _ ._ . _ . . _ .. ._ _ ... _ r . RESOLUTION RE: GRANT CHANGE OF ZONE FROM A (AGRICULTURAL) AND P.U.D. (I-1 AND C-2) USES TO P.U.D. (I-1 AND C-3) USES - SHIRLEY M. RICHARDSON AND MARY J. DARRAH WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the 1st day of April, 1992, at 10:00 a.m. for the purpose of hearing the application of Shirley M. Richardson, 1431 Elmhurst Lane, Longmont, Colorado 80503, and Mary J. Darrah, 809 Panorama Circle, Longmont, Colorado 80501, requesting a Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) and P.U.D. (I-1 and C-2) uses to P.U.D. (I-1 and C-3) uses for a parcel of land located on the following described real estate, to-wit: Part of the Si of Section 5 and the Ni of Section 8, Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado WHEREAS, the applicant was represented by Vern Nelson, Nelson Engineering, and WHEREAS, Section 28.8 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance provides standards for review of such a Change of Zone, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners heard all the testimony and statements of those present, has studied the request of the applicant and the recommendations of the Weld County Planning Commission, and, having been fully informed, finds that this request shall be approved for the following reasons: 1. The applicant has complied with all the application requirements listed in Section 28.5 et seq. , of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 2. The request is in conformance with Section 28.8 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: a. The proposed P.U.D. (Planned Unit Development) District is located within the I-25 MUD (I-25 Mixed-Use Development) area. The uses associated with the proposed P.U.D. District are consistent with the uses described in the I-25 MUD Section of the Comprehensive Plan. b. The uses allowed in the proposed P.U.D. District will conform with the performance standards contained in Section 35.3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. c. The P.U.D. District will be served by the Left Hand Water District and the St. Vrain Sanitation District. d. Access to the proposed P.U.D. District shall be provided in accordance with the letter, dated January 13, 1992, from Evan A. Hooper, Jr. , Colorado Department of Transportation. e. No overlay districts affect the site. The P.U.D. District does not contain any known commercial mineral deposits. PL0862 920298 PL08(oa-- c : CHANGE OF ZONE TO PUD - RICHARDSON AND DARRAH PAGE 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the application of Shirley M. Richardson and Mary J. Darrah for a Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) and P.U.D. (I-1 and C-2) uses to P.U.D. (I-1 and C-3) uses on the above referenced parcel of land be, and hereby is, granted subject to the following conditions: 1. The following notes shall be placed on the P.U.D. District plat: a. Uses allowed within the P.U.D. District shall comply with uses allowed in the I-1 (Industrial) and C-3 (Commercial) Districts of the Zoning Ordinance. b. A site plan review is required in accordance with Section 35.4 of the Zoning Ordinance. c. All streets within the P.U.D. District are private and shall be built to County standards. All streets within the P.U.D. District shall be maintained by the owners of the P.U.D. District, unless other arrangements are approved by the Board of County Commissioners. d. All P.U.D. Plan applications shall include a signed copy of an improvements, maintenance and repair agreement with the City of Longmont. The agreement shall address the eastern access of this P.U.D. District from State Highway 119 to the P.U.D. Plan access. This agreement shall not be required if Weld County excepts the eastern access for maintenance. e. Uses in the P.U.D. District involving outdoor storage of vehicles, equipment, or materials, shall be screened from State Highway 119. f. Maximum building height shall be 48 feet. g. The initial P.U.D. Plan application shall include a storm water management plan and a detailed master drainage plan for the P.U.D. District. All subsequent P.U.D. Plan applications shall include a storm water management plan designed in accordance with the master drainage plan. All drainage plans submitted with a site plan review application shall comply with the approved P.U.D. Plan storm water management plan. h. All P.U.D. Plan applications shall include a plan for signage which complies with the mixed use development policies of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. All plans for signage submitted with a site plan review application shall comply with the approved P.U.D. Plan for signage. Signs advertising goods, services, or functions of the P.U.D. Districts are not permitted. 920298 CHANGE OF ZONE TO PUD - RICHARDSON AND DARRAH PAGE 3 i. All requirements of the Mountain View Fire Protection District shall be met before and during construction. j . All P.U.D. Plan application materials shall comply with the requirements of the January 13, 1992, letter from Evan A. Hooper, Jr. , Colorado Department of Transportation. k. All P.U.D. Plan applications shall include a weed control plan in accordance with the January 13, 1992, letter from Louis Rademacher of the Longmont Soil Conservation District. 1. Sewer service shall be provided by the St. Vrain Sanitation District. m. Domestic water shall be provided by the Left Hand Water District. 2. Prior to recording the P.U.D. Plan plat: a. The seven existing general notes on the P.U.D. District plat shall be removed. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 1st day of April, A.D. , 1992. / BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: ✓�Sva WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County Clerk to the Board George Ke nedy, Chairman BY: )4/P&p& JJ EXCUSED DATE OF SIGNING - (AYE) Deputy 9erk to the Board Constance L. Harbert, Pro-Tem APPROVED AS 0 FORM: •�i� C. W. KirbyC `Ca-eC EXCUSED DATE OF SIGNING - (AYE) County Attorney Gordon E. Lacy/ t ( 1647A1017 W. H. Webster 920298 HEARING CERTIFICATION DOCKET NO. 92-14 RE: CHANGE OF ZONE FROM A (AGRICULTURAL) AND P.U.D. (I-1 AND C-2) USES TO P.U.D. (I-1 AND C-3) USES - SHIRLEY M. RICHARDSON AND MARY J. DARRAH A public hearing was conducted on April 1, 1992, at 10:00 A.M. , with the following present: Commissioner George Kennedy, Chairman Commissioner Constance L. Harbert, Pro-Tem Commissioner C. W. Kirby Commissioner Gordon E. Lacy Commissioner W. H. Webster Also present: Acting Clerk to the Board, Shelly Miller Assistant County Attorney, Lee Morrison Planning Department representative, Lanell Swanson The following business was transacted: I hereby certify that pursuant to a notice dated February 19, 1992, and duly published February 27, 1992, in The New News, a public hearing was conducted to consider the request of Shirley M. Richardson and Mary J. Darrah for a Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) and P.U.D. (I-1 and C-2) uses to P.U.D. (I-1 and C-3) uses. Lee Morrison, Assistant County Attorney, made this a matter of record. Lanell Swanson, Planning Department representative, recommended the Resolution of the Planning Commission and the Planning staff's recommendation be entered into the record as written. Ms. Swanson confirmed for Commissioner Lacy that the change from C-2 to C-3 uses allows for outside storage, and she stated the specifics will be addressed in the final plan stage. Commissioner Lacy stated he was concerned with the C-3 zoning existing along Highway 119. Vern Nelson, Nelson Engineering, represented the applicant and stated they agreed with the recommendation of the Planning Commission. Mr. Nelson addressed Commissioner Lacy's concern, saying that is not part of the rezoning. Ms. Swanson noted that is also a concern of the City of Longmont and will be addressed at the next stage. Ms. Swanson also confirmed that the water supply is adequate and explained I-1, C-1, C-2, and C-3 uses will be allowed on any lot. She said the specific uses on each lot will be addressed by staff through the site plan review process. (Change to Tape #92-13) After further discussion, Ms. Swanson and Mr. Morrison explained this is a PUD (Planned Unit Development), and all specifics on the final plan will supersede all general requirements. Mr. Nelson clarified that some of the area of the PUD will be for I-1 uses and other parts of the PUD will be for C-3 uses. There was no public testimony offered concerning this matter. Commissioner Webster moved to approve the request of Shirley M. Richardson and Mary J. Darrah for a Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) and P.U.D. (I-1 and C-3) uses to P.U.D. (I-1 and C-3) uses, based on the recommendation of the Planning staff and the Planning Commission, with the Conditions of Approval as entered into the record. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Kirby, and it carried unanimously. p 920298 PL OW.-- 1-(� 1, RE: HEARING CERTIFICATION - RICHARDSON AND DARRAH PAGE 2 This Certification was approved on the 6th day of April, 1992. APPROVED: ATTEST: ff4a/€4.1 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County' Clerk to the Boanrd, By: CJJ9f9 /C, Geo ge Ken dy, Chairman Deputy Clero to the Board EXCUSED DATE OF APPROVAL Constance L. Harbert, Pro-Tem TAPE #92-12 & #92-13 � C. W. Kir y DOCKET #92-14 EXCUSED DATE OF APPROVAL Gordon E. Lacy PL0862 leild if ) Q-6 W. H. Webster 920298 ATTENDANCE RECORD HEARINGS ARE AS FOLLOWS ON THIS 1st DAY OF April 1992: DOCKET It 92-14 - Change of Zone, Richardson and Darrah DOCKET It 92-16 - Special Review Permit, Joe Kutcher and Company DOCKET U DOCKET If PLEASE write or print your name legibly, your address and the DOCKET If (as listed above) or the name of the applicant of the hearing you are attending. NAME ADD I SS HEARING ATTENDING -' �j \?1` V C_ P( . Cb/ /damt 73n-/ der? }11 a 2,^i.:,11/7. 7307 3«< -- -gg_61) 1,t 4. , ii,�ae-LU I 7_ it �� /d,,,r � CyoZ b Cl� �9.- y� i ti,1/� i C CVv1M_. is-12 to`t" I h-a .4alet . • 920293 NOT I C E Pursuant to the zoning laws of the State of Colorado and the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, a public hearing will be held in the Chambers of the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, First Floor, Greeley, Colorado, at the time specified. All persons in any manner interested in the following proposed Change of Zone are requested to attend and may be heard. Should the applicant or any interested party desire the presence of a court reporter to make a record of the proceedings, in addition to the taped record which will be kept during the hearing, the Clerk to the Board's Office shall be advised in writing of such action at least five days prior to the hearing. The cost of engaging a court reporter shall be borne by the requesting party. BE IT ALSO KNOWN that the text and maps so certified by the Weld County Planning Commission may be examined in the office of the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners, located in the Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Third Floor, Greeley, Colorado. APPLICANTS DOCKET NO. 92-14 Shirley M. Richardson Mary J. Darrah 1431 Elmhurst Lane 809 Panorama Circle Longmont, Colorado 80503 Longmont, Colorado 80501 DATE: April 1, 1992 TIME: 10:00 A.M. REQUEST: Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) and P.U.D. (I-1 and C-2) uses to P.U.D. (I-1 and C-3) uses LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the Si of Section 5 and the Ni of Section 8, Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Approximately i mile east of the City of Longmont; south of and adjacent to State Highway 119, and east of and adjacent to Weld County Road 3 right-of-way BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO BY: DONALD D. WARDEN WELD COUNTY CLERK TO THE BOARD BY: Betty Henson, Deputy DATED: February 19, 1992 PUBLISHED: February 27, 1992, in The New News 9(7,C`"gri 1,1-(i it L) . L.i_', , Cc: . STATE OF COLORADO ) COUNTY OF WELD )s.s. ,� : David D. Reynolds, being duly sworn, says, that he is publisher of The New News, a weekly newspaper published in K burg in said County and State; that said newspaper has a general circulation in said County • and has been cantinously and • uninterruptedly . published therein, vmm Curing a period of at least fifty—two consecutive weekG rtaTr to the z Nws d Me the first prior to sraedcummaoandewelacaurc�v publication of the annexed °map�de�,�ed notice; that said newspaper is a d Cm,ntyCdCotruntissmes d Weld newspaper within the meaning of the Centennial Cm�terao415a19m 9h Street, act of the 6 Flow Greeley.Centers at the mne 1 Assembly of the pence an any roamer State of Colorado,, entitled "An Act htereatea fn to to regulate the printing legal e d Zee are ahe may,be;sera of seta the applicant maMudea= reporter to make a record et the notices and advertisements, " anditelner:dedirwrith will be kept kmartlthe �'�' desire an dpaatca d a `°°'' amendments thereto; that the noticein addition to the. taped of which the annexed is a printed m adiop at leak five days copy taken from said newspaper, was . to the "" de acme published in said newspaper and in �` ahau he lwme by the the regular and entire issue of �viorowN iming that red and so certified by the weld Counlyevery number thereof , the cf the C��sen �*� located n the weN Caamdal once a week Tor - Center Flow,915 Eth Street • successive weeks; that said notice 'rnro.saie nerucenls: M x;rsrav�ti yy a` so1431 Elmhurst lane toot published in 'said 'newspaper QrS Man1a m proper and not in any supplement 1,1992 thereof , and that the first • °^M puolication of said notice as . �,'p)and d n toi r .��1 aMG3p �e aforesaid, was on the rFr°` 1> f[ON: west( re SSg'h•�Cd Section 5 and the N44 d SecWo, er,� day 01 t -, 19 I'1- east ate[ct:'the wApty deem®rel:mirky mile_ and adjacent to State Ili aY 119 r and east d aM adjacmt fo weld and the last on the E day of R°°d3 ueatillY COUNTY imp COLSNERSRADO ...-1::::!yi 19 WARDEN BY: �D. CLERK TO • BY: 19. Has"4 DgxtY r/ Wens, N. 15 k Subscribed and sworn to before me this rL%,day of. e-c6EL 192.1=. n £ 4t if i U.- ....&-,�, h\41r Cnmrnission expires March 15.19a? • <� va_o(1rti. CERTIFICATE OF MAILING The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Notice of Hearing, Docket #92-14, was placed in the United States mail, postage prepaid, addressed to the following property owners. DATED this 10th day of March, 1992. 1 , Deputy Clerk fb me Board The Anschutz Corporation, Inc. 555 17th Street Denver, Colorado 80216 Calvin Petroleum Corporation 145 First Street Ft. Lupton, Colorado 80916 Ramona E. Helton 0545 State Highway 119 Longmont, Colorado 80504 George I. & Sumiye Mayeda John Y. and Betty K. Mayeda 10702 Weld County Road 1 Longmont, Colorado 80501 Barbara J. Johnson 1715 Harward Longmont, Colorado 80501 JCK, Ltd. Z Catherine Hamm Oliver 4465 Pioneer Drive Greeley,Colorado 80634 Andrea P. Bigelow 990 East State Highway 119 Longmont, Colorado 80504 Margaret Ayers 996 East State Highway 119 Longmont, Colorado 80504 Charles R. and Shirli Mae Hayes 998 East State Highway 119 Longmont, Colorado 80504 *� "3 .s pt;�' a� City of Longmont 408 Third Avenue Longmont, Colorado 80501 Ernest L. Peterson 12963 Hilcrest Drive Longmont, Colorado 80501 St. Vrain, Ltd. % Richard Domencio 8200 West 67th Arvada, Colorado 80604 Temperature Processing Co. , Inc. 10477 Weld County Road 7 Longmont, Colorado 80501 Donald W. and Adele A. Baldridge 3215 Wade Circle Colorado Springs, Colorado 80917 Shirley M. Richardson 1431 Elmhurst Lane Longmont, Colorado 80503 Mary J. Darrah 809 Panorama Circle Longmont, Colorado 80501 92432 i sv I c Yet. 0co 0' O Laal £ F 0 Ps") CO W E V xz ! i w00e»Z L aF0H s l Li ZN.rri� rower 11, r,r .. a Ln • �. F, .: vv w 4_ x J� 4� I- O I- O CO CV.O Ct. S ZE909 00%980100 IA313380—9SL X08'O'd r), 1°' • SUMMARY OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING February 4, 1992 A regular meeting of the Weld County Planning Commission was held February 4, 1992 in the County Commissioners' Hearing Room (Room #101) , Weld County Centennial Building, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado. The meeting was called to order by the Chairman, Bud Clemons, at 1:34 p.m. Tape 408 Roll Call Richard Kimmel Present Jean Hoffman Present Tom Rulon Present Bill O'Hare Present Judy Yamaguchi Present LeAnn Reid Absent Don Feldhaus Present Shirley Camenisch Present Bud Clemons Present Also present: Rod Allison, Principal Planner, Lee Morrison, Assistant County Attorney, Sharyn Ruff, Secretary. The summary of the last regular meeting of the Weld County Planning Commission held on January 21, 1992, was approved as read. CASE NUMBER: Z-465 APPLICANT: Shirley M. Richardson and Mary J. Darrah REQUEST: A Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) and P.U.D. (I-1 and C-2) uses to P.U.D. (I-1 and C-3) uses. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the S2 of Section 5, and the N2 of Section 8, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: Approximately 1/2 mile east of the City of Longmont; south of and adjacent to State Highway 119, and east of and adjacent to Weld County Road 3 right-of-way. Vern Nelson, Nelson Engineering, representative for the applicants, Shirley Richardson and Mary Darrah, explained they are located in the I-25 Mixed-Use Development Area. The purpose of the rezoning is to create an area compatible with proposed growth in Weld County and to upgrade the land. Other development in the area includes a trucking company, a compost facility, and the Longmont Landfill. Bud Clemons asked what the difference is between C-2 and C-3 zoning. Rod Allison explained C-2 allows only enclosed indoor storage and C-3 allows for outside 10 storage with proper screening. n Q ls ' £9 /0 1: 0/l r3'i MINUTES OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING February 4, 1992 Page 2 The Chairman asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak for or against this application. No one wished to speak. Jean Hoffman moved Case Number Z-465 with Development Standards and Conditions of Approval, be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with the Planning Commissions' recommendation for approval. Judy Yamaguchi seconded the motion. The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Richard Kimmel - yes; Jean Hoffman - yes; Tom Rulon - yes; Bill O'Hare - yes; Don Feldhaus - yes; Shirley Camenisch - yes; Bud Clemons - yes. Motion unanimously carried. CASE NU ER: S-319 APPLICAN Harrison Resource Corporation REQUEST: A Final P.U.D. Plan, 1st Filing an a Site Specific Development lan. LEGAL DESCRI ION: Part of the NE4 of Sec ion 5, T6N, R67W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colors . LOCATION: Wes of and adjacent to State ghway 257 and south of and adjacent to W ld County Road 74. Craig Harrison, ap licant, asked if a one on the Planning Commission had any questions regarding his proposal. Jean Hoffman asked hi to explain about the redesign of the proposal. Craig Harrison showed on the isplay m where they had changed a cul-de-sac at the recommendation of Weld C unty En ineering. Bill O'Hare asked what the ap icant had in mind for the Commercial zone area. Craig Harrison explained th zoning only included C-1 and C-2 zoning. Public sewer would be required to ld. This is a very strategic intersection. Jean Hoffman asked what is th m ximum height for commercial buildings. Craig Harrison said maximum hei t wa 40 feet. Shirley Camenisch asked about ground water levels in the area Craig arrison explained they had gone the extra mile and soil tested each s' e. Grou water is no problem. Rod Allison said this was part of the appli ation proce s, they have to meet Weld County Standards. Lee Morrison explain foundations on' t have to be engineer designed if ground water elevation and soils test meet equirements. The Chairman aske if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak for or against the a plication. Manuel Peneda surrounding property owne , wanted to go on record as being in favor of thi application. cc - . -F-7 rrn -7 2: 23 BEFORE THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, PLANNING COMMISSION CLEL,: . RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIOZIEBL$ L' ''' Moved by Jean Hoffman that the following resolution be introduced for passage by the Weld County Planning Commission. Be it resolved by the Weld County Planning Commission that the application for: CASE NUMBER: Z-465 NAME: Shirley M. Richardson Mary J. Darrah 1431 Elmhurst Lane 809 Panorama Circle Longmont, CO 80503 Longmont, CO 80501 REQUEST: A Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) and P.U.D. (I-1 and C-2) uses to P.U.D. (I-1 and C-3) uses. LEGAL: Part S2 of Section 5 and the N2 of Section 8, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: Approximately 1/2 mile east of the City of Longmont; south of and adjacent to State Highway 119, and east of and adjacent to Weld County Road 3 right-of-way. be recommended favorably to the Board of County Commissioners for the following reasons: 1. The submitted materials are in compliance with the application requirements of Section 28.5 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 2. The rezoning request is in conformance with Section 28.7 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance: The proposed Planned Unit Development (P.U.D. ) District is located within the I-25 Mixed-Use Development (I-25 M.U.D. ) area. The uses associated with the proposed P.U.D. District are consistent with the uses described in the I-25 M.U.D. Section of the Comprehensive Plan. The uses allowed in the proposed P.U.D. District will conform with the performance standards contained in Section 35.3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. The P.U.D. District will be served by the Left Hand Water District and the St. Vrain Sanitation District. Access to the proposed P.U.D. District shall be provided in accordance with the letter, dated January 13, 1992, from Evan A. Hooper, Jr. , Colorado Department of Transportation. No overlay districts affects the site. The P.U.D. District does not contain any known commercial mineral deposits. LXNli51i RESOLUTION, Z-465 Shirley M. Richardson and Mary J. Darrah Page 2 These determinations are based, in part, upon a review of the application submitted by the applicant, other relevant information regarding the request, and responses from referral entities. The Planning Commission's recommendation for approval is conditional upon the following: 1. The following notes shall be placed on the P.U.D. District plat: Uses allowed within the P.U.D. District shall comply with uses allowed in the I-1 (Industrial) and C-3 (Commercial) Districts of the Zoning Ordinance. A site plan review is required in accordance with Section 35.4 of the Zoning Ordinance. All streets within the P.U.D. District are private and shall be built to County standards. All streets within the P.U.D. District shall be maintained by the owners of the P.U.D. District, unless other arrangements are approved by the Board of County Commissioners. All P.U.D. Plan applications shall include a signed copy of an improvements, maintenance and repair agreement with the City of Longmont. The agreement shall address the eastern access of this P.U.D. District from State Highway 119 to the P.U.D. Plan access. This agreement shall not be required if Weld County excepts the eastern access for maintenance. Uses in the P.U.D. District involving outdoor storage of vehicles, equipment, or materials, shall be screened from State Highway 119. Maximum building height shall be 48 feet. The initial P.U.D. plan application shall include a storm water management plan and a detailed master drainage plan for the P.U.D. district. All subsequent P.U.D. plan applications shall include a storm water management plan designed in accordance with the master drainage plan. All drainage plans submitted with a site plan review application shall comply with the approved P.U.D. plan storm water management plan. All P.U.D. plan applications shall include a plan for signage which complies with the mixed use development policies of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. All plans for signage submitted with a site plan review application shall comply with the approved P.U.D. plan for signage. Signs advertising goods, services, or functions of the P.U.D. districts are not permitted. vP;'i.i'^,e"7 RESOLUTION, Z-465 Shirley M. Richardson and Mary J. Darrah Page 3 All requirements of the Mountain View Fire Protection District shall be met before and during construction. All P.U.D. Plan application materials shall comply with the requirements of the January 13, 1992, letter from Evan A. Hooper, Jr. , Colorado Department of Transportation. All P.U.D. Plan applications shall include a weed control plan in accordance with the January 13, 1992, letter from Louis Rademacher of the Longmont Soil Conservation District. Sewer service shall be provided by the St. Vrain Sanitation District. Domestic water shall be provided by the Left Hand Water District. 2. Prior to recording the P.U.D. Plan plat: The 7 existing general notes on the P.U.D. District plat shall be removed. Motion seconded by Judy Yamaguchi. VOTE: For Passage Against Passage Richard Kimmel Jean Hoffman Tom Rulon Bill O'Hare Judy Yamaguchi Don Feldhaus Shirley Camenisch Bud Clemons The Chairman declared the resolution passed and ordered that a certified copy be forwarded with the file of this case to the Board of County Commissioners for further proceedings. CERTIFICATION OF COPY I, Sharyn Ruff, Recording Secretary for the Weld County Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution, is a true copy of the Resolution of the Planning Commission of Weld County, Colorado, adopted on February 4, 1992. Dated l � the 4th of February 4, 1992. Sharyn J. Ruff Secretary F/ ...in I 44"�;'9 JJ INVITEMS INVENTORY OF ITEMS SUBMITTED FOR CONSIDERATION Applicant: r ,,LApresa yparra� Case Number: Z-c-a5 Submitted or Prepared Prior to Hearing At Hearing 1. Application Pages .7/2/2? 2. Application plat(s) page 11) 3. DPS Referral Summary Sheet 4. DPS Recommendation 5. DPS Surrounding Property Owner's Mailing List 6. DPS Mineral Owner's Mailing List 7. DPS Maps Prepared by Planning Technician 8. DPS Notice of Hearing 9. DPS Case File Summary Sheet 10. DPS Field Check A *t, pivoi,on of H b Wayt /e- er I..41 //f3/1z, 1 O IL. Pcmy Corr,7 £N,.roerrs /ne,.,v 044^ �/'y 427 /fen- ]3 . (nth v;e 'rte. fro - �:Sfr. c*/ / o1N s4 //i.3/4i. //A°� )'/, Ls.>/mawf S.G. Jij4.-.'.fir /t % " 1/1-1/4 2_ / J� i tc /s �'D (0,04,2,‘.4.1. C c (0,04,2,‘.4.1 S',r�c J / 1. ' //3/ 1 / , S{,tr)c (AMerurrkq F (tect % I/�/D/��(*2 � Iry 17. Co.N+,7 b&5,Nct - I1'I4ry t�2-t/rZ I' Jet Y_ d 1/31. (/- ?ece rcco - let - 1/30/5 Z I hereby certify that the items identified herein were submitted to the Department of Planning Services at or prior to the scheduled Planning Commission hearing. I further certify that these items were forwarded to the Clerk to the Board' s office on /Z-Zialarm £ tA Planner STATE OF COLORADO ) COUNTY OF WELD ) 1`- SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS I/ day of F-r ktvia<y 199c� SEAL NOTARY PUBLIC My Commission Expires Cl --g— j/ hXN1r31r EXHIBIT INVENTORY CONTROL SHEET • Case - 4 L cc�v� �^�- Exhibit Submitted 1By� U `' Exhibit Description 7 5 A. k ?2- ^-AlU 12 / B• 11? 1 co,. C. Ann— .,,-.�,,. , I,,vL D' Cd4L L cz Ybac-c-54 " E. F. G. H. I. J. K. L. M. N. 0. P. Q. R. S. T. U. V. w. X. Y. Z. _ CASE NUMBER: Z-465 NAME: Shirley M. Richardson Mary J. Darrah 1431 Elmhurst Lane 809 Panorama Circle Longmont, CO 80503 Longmont, CO 80501 REQUEST: A Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) and P.U.D. (I-1 and C-2) uses to P.U.D. (I-1 and C-3) uses. LEGAL: Part S2 of Section 5 and the N2 of Section 8, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: Approximately 1/2 mile east of the City of Longmont; south of and adjacent to State Highway 119, and east of and adjacent to Weld County Road 3 right-of-way. The Department of Planning Services recommends this request be approved for the following reasons: 1. The submitted materials are in compliance with the application requirements of Section 28.5 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 2. The rezoning request is in conformance with Section 28.7 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance: The proposed Planned Unit Development (P.U.D.) District is located within the 1-25 Mixed-Use Development (I-25 M.U.D. ) area. The uses associated with the proposed P.U.D. District are consistent with the uses described in the I-25 M.U.D. Section of the Comprehensive Plan. The uses allowed in the proposed P.U.D. District will conform with the performance standards contained in Section 35.3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. The P.U.D. District will be served by the Left Hand Water District and the St. Vrain Sanitation District. Access to the proposed P.U.D. District shall be provided in accordance with the letter, dated January 13, 1992, from Evan A. Hooper, Jr. , Colorado Department of Transportation. No overlay districts affects the site. The P.U.D. District does not contain any known commercial mineral deposits. These determinations are based, in part, upon a review of the application submitted by the applicant, other relevant information regarding the request, and responses from referral entities. RECOMMENDATION, Z-465 Shirley M. Richardson and Mary J. Darrah Page 2 The Department of Planning Services' staff recommendation for approval is based upon the following conditions: 1. The following notes shall be placed on the P.U.D. District plat: Uses allowed within the P.U.D. District shall comply with uses allowed in the I-1 (Industrial) and C-3 (Commercial) Districts of the Zoning Ordinance. A site plan review is required in accordance with Section 35.4 of the Zoning Ordinance. All streets within the P.U.D. District are private and shall be built to County standards. All streets within the P.U.D. District shall be maintained by the owners of the P.U.D. District, unless other arrangements are approved by the Board of County Commissioners. All P.U.D. Plan applications shall include a signed copy of an improvements, maintenance and repair agreement with the City of Longmont. The agreement shall address the eastern access of this P.U.D. District from State Highway 119 to the P.U.D. Plan access. This agreement shall not be required if Weld County excepts the eastern access for maintenance. Uses in the P.U.D. District involving outdoor storage of vehicles, equipment, or materials, shall be screened from State Highway 119. Maximum building height shall be 48 feet. The initial P.U.D. plan application shall include a storm water management plan and a detailed master drainage plan for the P.U.D. district. All subsequent P.U.D. plan applications shall include a storm water management plan designed in accordance with the master drainage plan. All drainage plans submitted with a site plan review application shall comply with the approved P.U.D. plan storm water management plan. All P.U.D. plan applications shall include a plan for signage which complies with the mixed use development policies of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. All plans for signage submitted with a site plan review application shall comply with the approved P.U.D. plan for signage. Signs advertising goods, services, or functions of the P.U.D. districts are not permitted. CA°" 'T RECOMMENDATION, Z-465 Shirley M. Richardson and Mary J. Darrah Page 3 All requirements of the Mountain View Fire Protection District shall be met before and during construction. All P.U.D. Plan application materials shall comply with the requirements of the January 13, 1992, letter from Evan A. Hooper, Jr. , Colorado Department of Transportation. All P.U.D. Plan applications shall include a weed control plan in accordance with the January 13, 1992, letter from Louis Rademacher of the Longmont Soil Conservation District. Sewer service shall be provided by the St. Vrain Sanitation District. Domestic water shall be provided by the Left Hand Water District. 2. Prior to recording the P.U.D. Plan plat: The 7 existing general notes on the P.U.D. District plat shall be removed. 6i,it MEMORAnDU WIID€ To Rod Allison, Planning Date January 28, 1992 COLORADO From Drew Scheltinga, County Engineer Subject Richardson PUD Zone Change, Z-465 At the time of the first PUD plan application, two items need to be addressed. The internal roads need to be designed to a standard that will serve commercial and industrial traffic. The road system should be shown for the individual application and the overall site. The internal roads should be dedicated to public use, but will not be maintained by Weld County. Also, a drainage plan for the overall site and the individual site should be included with the first PUD plan application. III\ .2t__ I.r 2 6 1992 riletd ,'o:"" trPlanninn DS/mw:prrich.mrw cc: Commissioner Webster Planning Referral File - Richardson PUD Zone Change, Z-465 A '3 vhf 'n`�'�:< �"9 ' 92 01/30 :45 E 303 65 190 CITY OF L0NGM0NT 02 p Y'a E &; DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT < O PLANNING DIVISION CD Civic Center Complex/ Longmont, CO 80501 LOR p► (303) 651-8330 January 29, 1992 74- t./4. Aid - 192 / Mr. Rod Allison Principal Planner U Weld County Department of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 RE CASE NUMBER: Z-465 Dear Rod: Thank you very much for sending the Baldridge PUD - Change of Zone application to the City of Longmont for our review and comment. This application involves approximately 145 acres located south of SH119 and west of the access road into the City of Longmont's landfill. The applicant is proposing that the PUI) allow commercial and industrial uses. In reviewing the application, we have identified three areas of concern: screening, access, and signage. The application states that open storage can be located in the rear of lots and will be screened. The City suggests that Weld County only consider open storage on lots in the southern portion of the PUD and specifically not allow open storage on lots which front SH119. The screening of the open storage area on the approximately 4.5 acre parcel on SH119 that has developed adjacent to the access mad to our landfill is ineffective. The City requests that if Weld County does allow open storage in this PUD, the screening requirements will be far more stringent that what you have required in the past. As we had mentioned on previous referrals, the City again suggests that a condition of approval of any outdoor storage be a requirement for the augmentation of approved screening if it is not effective at visually screening the outdoor storage once the materials and/or vehicles are on-site. During the review of the Site Plan for the 4.5 acre parcel, the City and the applicant had negotiated an agreement concerning issues associated with the use of the access road. We had requested at that time that a condition of approval of that parcel's site plan be the execution and recordation of this Road Maintenance Agreement(an unsigned copy is attached). I can not find a s' ed, recorded agreement in our files. If there is one, please send me a copy. JAN 30 '92 15: 44 30 PRGE . 002 '92 01/38 1 6 S 303 651 6 3 CITY OF LONGMONT 03 If this agreement has not been executed and recorded, we again request that this application not be approved until an agreement between the City and the owners of the 4.5 acre parcel and this 145 acre parcel has been executed and recorded. If this agreement has been recorded, we may need to amend it to include the entire acreage in the Richardson PUD. My understanding is that this PUD includes land that has not been included in previous applications. The applicant proposes three access points to SH119, but has not submitted a traffic study. The City trusts that the Colorado Department of Transportation will review the proposed access points and that a traffic study for the entire PUD will be submitted and reviewed before they are granted. Given the fact that financial responsibilities for maintenance and future construction detailed in the attached Road Maintenance Agreement are based on a proportionate share assessment, we suggest that the applicant first submit a traffic study for the entire PUD before approval of the Change of Zone,followed by more specific site access studies as each phase develops (Site Plan). The City would be interested in reviewing a copy of all traffic studies since they will directly relate to the financial responsibilities for road maintenance and future construction. Please direct any questions about this agreement to Nick Wolfrum, Civil Engineering Manager, at 651-8304. Finally, we look forward to the detailing of architectural and design features of this PUD at the appropriate stage of Weld County's PUD process. We particularly are interested in the detailing of an overall signage plan for this development. Thank you again for the opportunity to comment on this Change of Zone application. If you have any questions, please call either Rode Greenberg, or me at 651-8330. Sincerely, c W-51g Brad Schol Planning Director xc: Phil Del Vecchio, Community Development Director Barb Huner, Public Works Director Nick Wolfnirn, Civil Engineering Manager Brad Bailey, Deputy City Manager Cal Youngberg, Civil Engineer III Tim Lucas, Sanitation Superintendent Sue Reed, Transportation Planner File: #2050-8a6 JAN 30 ' 92 15: 44 30 PAGE . 003 FIELD CHECK FILING NUMBER: Z-465 DATE OF INSPECTION: January 14, 1992 APPLICANT'S NAME: Shirley M. Richardson and Mary J. Darrah REQUEST: A Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) and P.U.D. (I-1 and C-2) uses to P.U.D. (I-1 and C-3) uses. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the S2 of Section 5 and the N2 of Section 8, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: Approximately 1/2 miles east of the City of Longmont; south of and adjacent to State Highway 119, and east of and adjacent to Weld County Road 3 right-of-way. LAND USE: N State Highway 119, agricultural production. E Tri-Mac Trucking, private road, single family home, mobile home, and pasture. S Composting facility, landfill, agricultural production. W Agricultural production. ZONING: N A (Agricultural) E P.U.D. (I-1 and C-3) uses, A (Agricultural) , USR-914 S A (Agricultural) and USR-779 W A (Agricultural) COMMENTS: There are no improvements on the parcel. The parcel is currently used for agricultural production. The parcel has two historical farm accesses to State Highway 119 and access to the private road east of the parcel. The property slopes north toward State Highway 119. Principal Planner n r- LAND-USE APPLICATION SUMMARY SHEET Date: January 28, 1992 CASE NUMBER: Z-465 Shirley M. Richardson Mary J. Darrah 1431 Elmhurst 809 Panorama Circle Longmont, CO 80503 Longmont, CO 80501 REQUEST: A Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) and P.U.D. (I-1 and C-2) to P.U.D. (I-1 and C-3) uses. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the S2 of Section 5 and the N2 of Section 8, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: Approximately 1/2 mile east of the City of Longmont; south of and adjacent to State Highway 119, and east of and adjacent to Weld County Road 3 right-of-way. PLANNING COMMISSION FUNCTION: To make a recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners consistent with the criteria listed in Section 28.7 of the Zoning Ordinance. The Department of Planning Services' staff has received recommendations from the following referral entities: 1. Geological Survey; 2. Colorado Department of Transportation; 3. Mountain View Fire Protection District; 4. U.S . Army Corps of Engineers; 5. Longmont Soil Conservation District; and 6. Shirley Camenisch, Weld County Planning Commission. The Department of Planning Services has not received any objection to this proposal. I I I ' ?el ..i.t.,_ — — -�. .. , , ,.•ax+sue- v , „..r \ „ .�k= R may'` 0 . { in ; / u fi . N u..)...... V M got 71 S i7 G _.__ yyI fi t OlLr:4 Y ear t x - - - - v? 9' ,'3 i I, C :[�'S LAKE + .!- 31 f• .‘,IffN RESERF'r>IR) - '32 33 4955 % 1 :'' \ r, . r S�FNN ( .},' ) ML_ _ _ _ � .r -�--a. _ --;\r-r-- - _ -- /1 I . d tV I1 1 /I r.�.�r.i \ `3 I , 'I OB I. I i t 1I / 1 AH � � ( 19 zo r-/ /zr • t.II. ,- '52 , (- -' 50 • roxru•wr n1 @ `-'3 ..0 5 7. @M.I\I I '• / \ % I `• • First▪ ° \ I t • Correction l/'('' •••• • IJONNS DV,N L r .. . } --•:(1---",..-......,...„7-12. •1,� �!/11i •Cry .o ro �. —•�L ,ne•' 5 .� 1 cum,. I 48 : _ EH GR T prE5TEAv 4# 1•4 RY a 16 !f • t. °. �f `�._ T yL aEN •3�� ( M • •A:Hummel• I I,L3, J •LL• 1 I • •• • POP TOE A•iii U J•NIII// ° ° • - Ci J1]..,' v • y. tlO9.`�-J \��iii////��e v• anwaipsol •44 ro.cr a„•, • :•I •Lam. • v. . ,'c: ° qtr_ _ • lI _v _•: . ? .�'"x/�• 1( p ale, 1 1 i•r.arvi . :I. c• y RC TM0 ° k: k• ' Fr; ri• ]• . T„ • 42 W s• i • l . N•••• • :. ...i �i H • --- a pd I, z x• x! . 5l qy• _y; H Y : ],• f • :7:b i. CC ▪ - ▪ / •1• !I (® I(---11----/ •__y„`/ V h.4O ,t c ----- ^• a • ° 3S SI I 38 . _ • _ .v . a, a• - ! '4r3°-- - sli - -z ° ur • • . - ? /----- 34 32 =� J : I: �` ', .v. Ivy.... eI. j. , :- Ri ' - 41 11,. . 1 \ • A ' mac—.• • - - •: ; .i r Zvi tU s4 L • 'A • �. 1 • xx �G.. 21 � • ' '4 1 C • i3. ' CAT TE"L-° o.LT � a .�•.zi 7 .a2 r--,••i N � t . • K •o 11 , ,o •�• x] 1 G Falter „ r g r, . L i - '•-' tl. A: S,,,,,•6<,,,c• az° g,„: ••� S C dpi zv ,--, s°xa xs s�; 23 F, Raa p J • u a ��.:. • • �-- Z_ v" l••� Z• 51.17T RE Li 51 • a �� !'� _.ter. A /• ' Viz 26 u�' G l a, _ • I i f.:' • 24 :`� : , • — _ ti a �t _ � 1 ...•L. YCMCR.RTL •�_ l .d_ pMiLLl l!: -2!t2• - __F I • ... - 22 • �� _- R�an•¢ - + 'I 1.0 T 2 N r---. • G ..42T-- • • W T • 144 , •• t • + .` •.} 1:1 • s19 I x. ] .a ` xL • a'� S 18 I 0a3 71, .c•"; • r ', •4•v1 + 1 g / _ „ '/ k • '; •p .F RE 1.7NE .. ,/ 4 /// �. S•. x• I. ▪ /I�Ji / • p • Aa a--, - - -L[/INS.vNI / 0, Vl rr Si. ' '/ •[S lc,' vim. lt_ - ' L o en j•r vG c� C r: •;/'/ 'Lr— n ;v.II...q�3x •'K( ], °C, •, Itl ,11,�' q v 1— 9' ��E• t 14 . TO!Crv,1., •.?IF'.2 ft p\..,! i i i 1,• NNFA22 "I •. . •_ , f :�• ) � 1 . �r.,�(' �, " ';'—' 3] ^ b •1 J K C CON: //"�+• v ':'I r L T ' OPr ar�14.+:xwa 9▪ • •• , 1 2 i 4 ° . 717.5, �e.:—G,�..• o „t or / t. s C—J ,I 'il .. sr __�� (F, q6 ��. .� --L r-e� 4 — --fir /. • �.�• t� •c� ii 12 .. REFERRAL LIST NAME: Shirley M. Richardson CASE NUMBER: Z-465 May J. Darrah REFERRALS SENT: January 6, 1992 REFERRALS TO BE RECEIVED BY: January 20, 1992 COUNTY TOWNS and CITIES Attorney _Ault MT—Health Department ____Brighton _Extension Service _Broomfield _Emergency Management Office _Dacono Sheriff's Office ____Eaton MT—Engineering Erie _Housing Authority _Evans _Airport Authority ____Firestone Building Inspection _Fort Lupton ____Frederick STATE _Garden City _Division of Water Resources _Gilcrest • X Geological Survey ____Greeley Department of Health ____Grover o X Highway Department ____Hudson Historical Society ____Johnstown Water Conservation Board _Keenesburg _ X Oil and Gas Conservation Commission _Kersey La Salle FIRE DISTRICTS ____Lochbuie Ault F-1 X Longmont _ _Berthoud F-2 _Mead _Brighton F-3 _Milliken _Eaton F-4 _New Raymer Fort Lupton F-5 Northglenn _ Galeton F-6 _Nunn _Hudson F-7 _Platteville _Johnstown F-8 _Severance La Salle F-9 _Thornton • X Mountain View F-10 Windsor Milliken F-11 _ Nunn F-12 COUNTIES _ _Pawnee F-22 _Adams _Platteville F-13 _Boulder _Platte Valley F-14 _Larimer Poudre Valley F-15 Raymer F-23 FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES Southeast Weld F-16 • X US Army Corps of Engineers _ Windsor/Severance _ F-17 USDA-APHIS Veterinary Service _Wiggins F-18 Federal Aviation Administration Western Hills F-20 _Federal Communication Commission OTHER SOIL CONSERVATION DISTRICTS Central Colo. Water Conservancy Dist. _Brighton _ Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. _ _ Fort Collins Tri-Area Planning Commission Greeley • X Longmont West Adams COMMISSION/BOARD MEMBER • X Shirley Camenisch STATE OF COLORADO DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS Nt OR P.O. Box 850 latrA Greeley, Colorado 80632-0850 • '9C : (303) 353-1232 I �. )ta)J E 1 , V/rr oc cow January 13, 1992 ��{ �,., 1 :2 U Weld Co. , S.H. 119 Richardson/Darrah '�,c,davo � IE'fienInr, Zone Change & PUD S.E. Cor. S.H. 119 Mr. Rod Allison, Planner and Co. Rd. 3 Department of Planning, Weld County 915 Tenth Street Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Mr. Allison: We have reviewed the Richardson and Darrah application for Zone Change and P.U.D. , and we have the following comments: Access to the P.U.D. may apparently be obtained from the existing "Road Easement" at the east line of Section 8. Improvements that may be necessary to the highway and the access will be identified upon presentation of a traffic study for the proposed property development. It is anticipated that the development will generate the need for turn lanes on the highway that will meet the design criteria of the State Highway Access Code. If such improvements are necessary, an Access Permit issued by this office will be required prior to construction of the improvements. The category of the section of highway involved will preclude any access to the highway in the center of the property, but could allow a properly designed and permitted access to be constructed at the western edge of the property. Three accesses to the state highway, as noted in General Note 5 on the plat, will not be allowed. The "Vicinity Map" that appears on the plat indicates that surface run-off may flow toward the highway drainage system. That system is for the protection of the state highway right of way and is not intended to accommodate drainage from abutting properties beyond that which has historically been accepted. Therefore, we ask that on site detention of surface run-off be provided so that the historical run-off rate will not be exceeded due to this development. Thank you for the opportunity to review this proposal . Please contact me at 350-2163 if you have any questions. Very truly yours, / ar�} . CEVan A(2 Hooper, /Tr. Development/Access Coordinator EAH/cm cc: L. D. Yost M. D. Fanning File °A re 1 sit t4r, Z DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES . 1R /%a'0117TV PHONE(303)356-4000,EXT.4400 �<�� ® �� , 916 10th STREET "Alpe /w: �T 'Z� GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 r: JH". 1932 ..., COLORADO Unco,. RECEIVEDv.,/ „,,,,/, January 6 , 1992 _ CASE NUMBER: Z-465 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from Shirley M. Richardson and Mary J. Darrah for a Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) and P.U.D. (I-1 and C-2) to P.U.D. (I-1 and C-3) . The parcel of land is described as part of the S2 of Section 5, and the N2 of Section 8, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is approximately 1/2 mile east of the City of Longmont, south of and adjacent to State Highway 119 and east of and adjacent to Weld County Road 3 right-of-way. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by January 20, 1992, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Rod Allison, Principal Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: 3. We have reviewed the 1 request and find no conflicts with our cyte�r,�ests. AJr 1'' e_Acs.r..&S he Cog £E=E-,S,,,,,e_e'-5 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Signe GnJ r.- Agency: -E.' V Date: , `e\ c V'L 11 JAN 17 1992 Weld County Planning ,av• MOUNTAIN VIEW FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 700 Weaver Park Road, Longmont, CO 80501 (303) 772-0710 Metro(303) 666-4404 January 13, 1992 Mr. Rod Allison, Principal Planner Weld County Dept. of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Mr. Allison: RE: Case Number Z-465 Change of Zone for Richardson PUD I have reviewed the proposal for the Change of Zone. The Fire District has no objections to this change. It is important that the applicants submit site plans for review by the District. The Uniform Fire Code, as adopted by the Fire District, has requirements for water supply, access, hydrants and identification as well as requirements for the specific buildings and occupancies in the development. The Fire District staff is available to meet with the architects and planners for the development as soon as they are ready to meet with us. The Fire District has adopted a plans review and inspection fee which will apply to this development. I have included a copy of the fee schedule and information packet about the fee. Please pass this on to the applicant. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Charles E. Boyes Fire Prevention Specialist CC: Jerry Ward, Chief of the District Mark Lawley, Division Chief, Fire Prevention 'Mr LAVOI �� AN 1 1992 Longmont Soil Conservation District 9595 Nelson Road, Box D-Longmont, CO 80501 -(303) 776-4034 January 13, 1992 Weld County Department of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Re: Case Number Z-465 - Shirley M. Richardson and Mary Darrah Dear Planning Department: This is in regard to the Richardson PUD. Weeds are becoming a major problem in Weld County. It is recommended that a weed control plan be developed for all phases of development for this property. Sincerely, cztel--L-c-cetw ft2..illefre-"LH Louis Rademacher President LR:rah .971-7 CONSERVATION • DEVELOPMENT - SELF-GOVERNMENT „op'(�r'a(tArlg+ �� of cc<o �,\1I Ott N Ci ROY R. ROMER 't <" 5 ::,,, �" JOHN W. ROLD GOVERNOR � DIRECTOR s /876 ' COLORADO GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 715 STATE CENTENNIAL BUILDING - 1313 SHERMAN STREET DENVER, COLORADO 80203 PHONE(303)866-2611 January 3 , 1992 2200 Mr. Rod Allison Weld County Department of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Re: Richardson/Darrah: Change of Zone from Ag. and P.U. D. to P.U. D. (I-1 and C-3 Uses) --Part of the S. 1/2 Sec. 5 and the N. 1/2 Sec. 8 , T. 2 N. , R. 68 W. Case Z-465 Dear Mr. Allison: After our discussions about the case referenced above yesterday and this morning, I think that it would be appropriate for our geotechnical review of the proposal to take place after the P.U. D. plans have been developed. We therefore request that you defer submittal of the appropriate materials supporting this proposal until that time. S ' cerely, ,7ame"s M SoA Engineering Geologist V d •1 Lu Si ‘1 11 JAN 2 1 1992 J — t ya!d Coe'ta!'!hnninn Qr-GEOLOGY •.J*1 `TO STORY OF THE PAST... KEY TO THE FUTURE FIELD CHECK FILING NUMBER: Z-465 DATE OF INSPECTION: / '' /C.') / ! APPLICANT'S NAME: Shirley M. Richardson/Mary J. Darrah PRINCIPAL PLANNER: Rod Allison REQUEST: A Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) and PUD (I-1 and C-2) to PUD (I-1 and C-3) . LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the S2 of Section 5, and the N2 of Section 8, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: Approximately 1/2 miles east of the City of Longmont; south of and adjacent to State Highway 119, and east of and adjacent to Weld County Road 3 right-of-way. LAND USE: N >Gl'G, et, AC +_OP 4 / Qt-d Don W I j�e�'� r, ,�, ZONING: N A (Agricultural) E PUD (I-1 and C-2) , A (Agricultural) S A (Agricultural) W A (Agricultural) COMMENTS: ✓ 1 I e c.dac�' Iz7,z' � .,_ ' tf Cn �, J: tcl .C � 1C� L, , : A 1 �� ; // 'VO A-1 LC /�- /1 �?r'i ,� �f; iU n,;7 L. v...//e4 SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS INTEREST AND/OR SUBSURFACE ESTATE Shirley Richardson/Mary Darrah Z-465 The Anschutz Corporation, Inc. 555 17th Street Denver, CO 80216 Calvin Petroleum Corporation 145 First Street Ft. Lupton, CO 80916 Ramona E. Helton 0545 State Highway 119 Longmont, CO 80504 George I. & Sumiye Mayeda John Y. and Betty K. Mayeda 10702 Weld County Road 1 Longmont, CO 80501 Barbara J. Johnson 1715 Harward Longmont, CO 80501 JCK, Ltd. c/o Catherine Hamm Oliver 4465 Pioneer Drive Greeley, CO 80634 Andrea P. Bigelow 990 East State Highway 119 Longmont, CO 80504 Margaret Ayers 996 East State Highway 119 Longmont, CO 80504 Charles R. and Shirli Mae Hayes 998 East State Highway 119 Longmont, CO 80504 City of Longmont 408 3rd Avenue Longmont, CO 80501 SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS INTEREST AND/OR SUBSURFACE ESTATE Shirley Richardson/Mary Darrah Z-465 Page 2 Ernest L. Peterson 12963 Hilcrest Drive Longmont, CO 80501 St. Vrain, Ltd. c/o Richard Domencio 8200 West 67th Arvada, CO 80604 Temperature Processing Co. , Inc. 10477 Weld County Road 7 Longmont, CO 80501 Donald W. and Adele A. Baldridge 3215 Wade Circle Colorado Springs, CO 80917 9,210 -- Li EfindjnE-9 STATE OF COLORADO ) • t• )iCOUNTY OF WELD v 'Me?d Gc'.!"t11J[ane*rn David 8. Reynolds, being duly sworn, says that he is publisher of The New News, a weekly newspaper published in Keenesburg in said County and State; that said newspaper has a general circulation in said County and has been eontinously and uninterruptedly • published therein, • during a period of at least fifty-two consecutive weeks prior to the first publication of the annexed notice; that said newspaper is a newspaper within the meaning of the act of the General Assembly of the NO77CE GE gxSAG State of Colorado,, entitled "An Act The eel • nar geecti4ml" to regulate the printing of legal ' geee de rajru5a 14s[j�31 pA°� notices and advertisements, " and �,D'1're bmG2°'Alinto �d - dments thereto; that the notice ad mar) jand wi " ' �palm� nt Iard u deemedas Part el c »hash the annexed is a printed "ter ad sa f y taken from said newspaper, was p. 00 ddo eef�bw L. wee ,...olished in said newspaper, and in {° t �l � the regular and entire issue of ,belt ` r9b t1a�, � every number thereof , 4-17,1L::: G 'n Eo d a , Wep P'luuwt' �'' itid i;' ,Ix. i � w once a week for the W d Ill Hwr) e successive weeke; that Said notace seG 't pu wat so published in said newspaper or ebjerlces related aet' proper and not in an ' su lemen u�" t Veld 4 s idq„the :.u,.. . Y PP �, ' per Vel c4' su "nmu, thereof . and that the first II Fn ri' �'s noes. ?915 tenth sui;d publication of said notice as fm i lid the „441711.0744.a117 { I17n aforesaid , was on the �,bie C� _\ as.* Plyuw fir W h 0.�1z %Id Y'. _ c d 3° c,G.s tien"t�t'ei•to"9155 7�,itn I day of , -1�I Colorado-PM"k.max: 19 1 ` t .4 W,,J - w� , 0u� . and the last on the tI day of f o t published To be l d,re`"lu'\te"� lc iTi2 a �[L— li 2 +hd u, 71x, Net, yuus -he, ,kfl31\-:K'G ->d , Subscribed and sworn io before me this L_.day of/12 �r.,,,.ec.� 19_22- /0.2-7.44..A.-.. J 1C.--rz._._-- • MyCommiss`or ;tin! -WH-oh 15.1g51? retil)t. DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE(303)356-4000,EXT.MOO 91510th STREET GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 III C. COLORADO January 6 , 1992 Art Uhrich Nelson Engineering 520 Greeley National Bank Plaza Greeley, CO 80631 Subject: Z-465 - Request for a Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) and PUD (I-1 and C-2) to PUD I-1 and C-3 on a parcel of land described as part of the S2 of Section 5, and the N2 of Section 8, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. Dear Art: Your application and related materials for the request described above are complete and in order at the present time. I have scheduled a meeting with the Weld County Planning Commission for February 4, 1992, at 1:30 p.m. This meeting will take place in the County Commissioners' Hearing Room, first floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado. It is recommended that you and/or a representative be in attendance to answer any questions the Planning Commission members might have with respect to your application. It is the policy of Weld County to refer an application of this nature to any town or municipality lying within three miles of the property in question or if the property under consideration is located within the comprehensive planning area of a town or municipality. Therefore, our office has forwarded a copy of the submitted materials to the City of Longmont for its review and comments. Please call Froda Greenberg at 776-6050 for further details regarding the date, time, and place of this meeting. It is recommended that you and/or a representative be in attendance at the Planning Commission Meeting to answer any questions the Commission members may have with respect to your application. It is the responsibility of an applicant to see that a sign is posted on the property under consideration at least 10 days preceding the hearing date. Sometime prior to January 24, 1992, you or a representative should call me to obtain a sign to be posted on the site no later than January 26, 1992. The sign shall be posted adjacent to and visible from a publicly maintained road right-of-way. In the event the property under consideration is not adjacent to a publicly maintained road right-of- way, the applicant shall post one sign in the most prominent place on the property and post a second sign at the point at which the driveway (access drive) intersects a publicly maintained road right-of-way. Your sign posting certificate must be returned to the Department of Planning Services' office on or before the date of the hearing. Z-465 January 6, 1992 Page 2 The Department of Planning Services' staff will make a recommendation concerning this application to the Weld County Planning Commission. This recommendation will be available twenty-four (24) hours before the scheduled hearing. It is the responsibility of the applicant to call the Department of Planning Services' office before the Planning Commission hearing to make arrangements to obtain the recommendation. Please call if you have any questions. Respectfully, Rod Allison Principal Planner mEmoRAnDum W I`li O�. Weld County Planning January 31, 1992 To Date COLORADO Judy Schmidt, Supervisor, Environmental Protection Servi s� From Fm Case Number: 2-465 Name: Richardson, Shirley M. Subject: DALLdh, Maly J. Environmental Protection Services has reviewed this proposal and recommends for approval, subject to the following conditions: 1. This Division requires that all facilities utilize the Saint Vrain Sanitation District sewer treatment system. 2. Water service to all facilities shall be provided by Left Hand Water District. JS/cs-200 Lu LAW; FEB 4 1992 Weld Coca!PlannP^ra ti'^'an 470231 CHANGE OF ZONE PUD RICHARDSON DECEMBER, 1991 PREPARED BY: NELSON ENGINEERS GREELEY, COLORADO 9207-39S PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION Department of Planning Services, 915 10th Street, Room 342, Greeley, Colorado PHONE: 356.4000 Ext. 4400 FOR PLANNING DEPARTMENT USE ONLY: CASE NO, APPLICATION FEE DATE RECEIVED RECEIPT NO. APPLICATION CHECKED BY RECORDING FEE RECEIPT NO. TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT: (Print or type only except for required signatures.) I (we), the undersigned, hereby request hearings before the Weld County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners concerning the proposed PUD rezoning of the following described unincorporated area of Weld County, Colorado: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See attached (If additional apace is required, attach an additional sheet) Property Address ( ,f available): PRESENT ZONE AR. PUD I-1&C-2 PROPOSED ZONE PUD I-1 & C-3 TOTAL ACREAGE 144.9 OVERLAY ZONES SURFACE FEE (PROPERTY OWNERS) OF AREA PROPOSED FOR PUD REZONING: individually and as Pers. Rep. of Estate of C. P. Richardson, deceased, NAME: Shirley M. Richardsnn/ HOME TELEPHONE:(3Q3) 772-7714 ADDRESS: 1431 Elmhurst Lane Longmont, Colorado 80503 BUS. TELEPHONE: NAME: Mary Jill Darrah HOME TELEPHONE: (303) 772-2299 ADDRESS: 809 Panorama Circle Longmont, CO 805Q1 BUS. TELEPHONE: APPLICANT OR AUTHORIZED AGENT fif different than above): NAME: HOME TELEPHONE: ADDRESS: BUS. TELEPHONE: OWNER(S) AND/OR LESSEES OF MINERAL RIGHTS ON OR UNDER THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES OF RECORD IN THE WELD COUNTY ASSESSOR'S OFFICE: NAME: Anschutz Corporation, Inc. ADDRESS: 555 17th Street, Denver, Colorado _ NAME: Calvin Petroleum Corporation ADDRESS: 145 First Street, Fort Lupton, Colorado 80621 NAME: ADDRESS: • I hereby depose and state under the penalties of perjury that all statements, proposals, and plans submitted with or contained within this application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. COUNTY OF WELD ) 'Shirley Richardson, individually and as Per. Rep. of Estate SS of C. P / Richardson, d ceased. STATE OF COLORADO) ' Signature: S t; . ' 0 or Authorized Agent Subsicribed-tind sworn to before me this 17th day of December 19 91 r ' p�AY t' NO4Y PUBLIC 'fPt)t 3 My commission expires June 9, 1994. 4.•Or,L9\-oNt SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS RICHARDSON ESTATE DECEMBER, 1991 SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS RICHARDSON ESTATE December, 1991 1 . The PUD district application forms and application fee. The PUD District application forms and application fee of $750 are attached. 2 . A statement describing the proposed PUD Concept, land-use(s) , and architectural style of the PUD. The 145 acre PUD will consist of C-3 (Commercial) and I-1 ( Industrial ) uses as listed in the Weld County Zoning Ordianace. The planning projected for the area includes commercial uses adjacent to or near the entrance to the property at Weld County Roads 3 and 3-1/3 with industrial uses at other locations. An open space greenway as appro- - priate is planned along portions of the property fronting on Colorado Highway 119. All outside storage areas shall be screened in accordance with Section 33.6.1 . 9 of the Zoning Ordinance. Richardson PUD will be governed by private covenants, which will address architectural and design features of the devel- opment. Items such as, screening, open storage, landscape requirements, maintenance, fencing and signs will be addressed in the convenants and PUD plan application stage. _ In general, the architectural style will provide for open space interspersed with low-rise, conventional buildings using building materials mainly consisting of brick, wood and masonry tastefully designed to be compatible with the surroundings. Open storage can be located in rear of lot areas in order to utilize building screening as well as fencing and/or trees and shrubbery. Open storage will be tastefully designed to take advantage of the topography and natural environment. 3 . A statement which demonstrates the proposed PUD rezoning is consistent with the policies of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. The proposed land uses are consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan designation for Planned Unit Developments . The site is in a Planned Unit Development Overlay District known as the I-25 Mixed-Use Development Area and Activity Centers . Uses allowed within the PUD are intended to fall within the Weld County Zoning classifications of C-3 and I-1 . 4 . A statement which demonstrates how the USES allowed by the pro- - posed PUD rezoning will be compatible within the PUD district. In addition, a detailed description of how any conflicts be- tween land uses within the PUD district are being avoided or mitigated and can comply with Section 35.3 of the Weld County Zonning Ordinance. To insure compatibility of uses within the PUD, land uses that are compatible or alike will be located adjacent to one another. Therefore, no conflicts between land uses within the PUD are anticipated. Design standards will be established through architectural covenants and will specifically address the Performance Standards outlined in Section 35.3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. The uses allowed within the PUD will be limited to those allowed in the Weld County Zoning Ordinance for C-3 and I-1 uses. 5. A statement which demonstrates how the USES allowed by the proposed PUD rezoning will be compatible with land uses surrounding the PUD district; in addition, a detailed des- cription of how any conflicts between land uses surrounding the PUD district are being avoided or mitigated. Surrounding land uses are primarily agriculture. Two areas along the south and east sides are designated as USR for sani- tary landfill and solid waste disposal uses by the City of Longmont. An area at the northeast corner is a PUD with I-1 and C-3 zoning currently used as a large trucking dispatch area. These surrounding uses are campatible with the proposed zoning of PUD with C-3 and I-1 uses. Compatibility with surrounding land uses will be ensured by the following: a. The proposed uses are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designations. b. Architectural covenants will be established which provide for design standards to ensure a compatible development. c. Landscaping will be required in conjunction with the development. 6. A description of each use within the PUD. A description of all building, structures , and open storage areas, including _ size, floor area, and height. A description of the type of residential units within the PUD, including total number of units for each type. The PUD plan application will include detailed information and covenants regulating signage, outdoor storage, and land- scaping. Outdoor storage will be screened from Highway 119 and the balance of the PUD district as required by the Weld County Zoning Regulations. Open space area will be required with low-rise, conventional buildings. 4A 2J+F 7 . A description of the size and type of any public and private open space and semi-public uses, including parks, recreation areas, school sites, fire and sheriff facilities, and similar uses. Private open space will be provided along Colorado Highway 119 and along the sides of the tract. Sizes of open space will be dictated by actual uses described in the final PUD plan. No public or semi-public uses are anticipated. 8 . A description of the water source and system and a statement from the representative of the provider of the water system which demonstrates that the water supply quality and quantity is sufficient to meet the requirements of the uses within the PUD district. A PUD district with residential USES shall be served by a PUBLIC WATER system. Water service for the PUD will be provided by the Left Hand Water District (see attached statement) . The internal water system will be developed consistent with the Fire Protection District Regulations and approved by the Left Hand Water District . 9. A description of the sewage disposal facility. If the faci- lity is a sewer system, a statement from the representative of the provider of the sewer system utility which demonstrates that the sewer system will adequately serve the uses within the PUD district. Sanitary sewer service for the PUD will be provided by the St. Vrain Sanitation District (see attached statement) . The on-site system will be designed and installed consistent with the regulations of the District. 10. A description of the functional classification, width, and structural capacity of the STREET and highway facilities which provide access to the PUD district. If the street or highway facilities providing access to the PUD district are not adequate to meet the requirements of the proposed district the applicant shall supply information which demonstrates the willingness and financial capability to upgrade the STREET or highway facilies in conformance with the Transporation Section of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. This shall be shown by submitting, with the Planned Unit Development District application, a separate off-site road improvements agreement describing the proposed road improvements and method of guaranteeing installation of said improvements in conformance with the Weld County Policy on Collateral for Improvements. The agreement shall be used for the purposes of review, evalua- _ tion, and compliance with this section. No rezoning shall be finally approved by the Board of County Commissioners until the applicant has submitted an improvements agreement or con- - tract which sets forth the form of improvements and guarantees and is approved by the Board of County Commissioners. As required and as development occurs, site specific traffic analyses will be performed in conjunction with each final PUD plan. Access road improvements to Colorado Highway 119 if required by the Colorado Department of Highways will be accomplished based upon the anticipated traffic impact on the highway of the uses within the final PUD phase. The separate off-site road improvements agreement will provide for detail- the required improvements and the installation thereof by the land owner of the PUD. 11. A soil survey and study of the site proposed for the change of zone with a statement regarding suitability of soils to support all USES allowed in the proposed zone. If the soils survey and study indicate soils which present moderate or severe limitations to the construction of STRUCTURES or faci- lities on the site, the applicant shall submit information which demonstrates that the limitations can be overcome. This information will be forwarded to the Colorado Geological Survey for evaluation. The soils within the PUD are made up of three general types as defined by the Soil Conservation Service soil survey of Weld County southern part. Ascalon Loam: deep, moderately permeable, well drained soil on terraces above major streams and formed in alluvium deposits. The soil exhibits good potential for urban development. Wiley-Colby Complex: deep, gently sloping, well drained soil with moderate permeability that formed in calcareous eolian deposits. The soil exhibits fair to good potential for urban type development. Nunn Clay Loam: deep, somewhat level, well drained, on terraces, and formed by eolian and alluvial deposits. The surface soil exhibits fair to poor potential for urban development. This application is being accompanied by Exhibit D, guide- line excerpts from the published "Soils Survey of Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part" , developed by the United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Services (SCS) . The soils show some restrictions that will have to be addres- sed by site specific soil testing and report by a certified �;'� y soils engineer prior to development of each area of the PUD. These restrictions can be mitigated through detailed subsur- face soils investigations, application of appropriate drain- age facilities, and strict adherence to the recommendations of the soils report. 12. If, according to maps and other information available to Weld County, the Department of Planning Services determines that there appears to be a sand, gravel, or other mineral resources on or under the subject property, the applicant shall provide a mineral resourse statement prepared by a certified geologist or other qualified expert. The statement shall indicate the estimated quality of resources and indicate the economic feasi- bility of recovery, now and in the future, of the resources so that the Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners can determine whether a COMMERCIAL MINERAL DEPOSIT, as defined in Colorado Revised Statues is contained on or under the sub- ject properties. This information will be forwarded to the Colorado Geological Survey for evaluation. According to U. S. Soil Conservation Service maps, there appears to be no evidence of commercial grade mineral or gravel deposits underlying the site. In addition, there are no records of mineral owners or lessees other than oil and gas leases, for the subject property. 13. If the proposed change of zone is located within a FLOOD HAZARD AREA, identified by maps officially adopted by Weld County, the applicant shall submit information which either documents how the Weld County supplementary regulations con- cerning flood plains have been satisfied or document how the applicant intends to meet the requirements of the Weld County supplementary regulations concerning flood plains. The site is situated more than 500 feet north of and more than 30 feet above the Saint Vrain Creek flood plain hazard area and is outside the Flood Hazard Area. 14 . If the proposed change of zone is located within a GEOLOGIC HAZARD AREA identified by maps officially adopted by Weld County, the applicant shall submit information which either documents how the Weld County supplementary regulations con- cerning geologic hazards have been satisfied, or documents how the applicant intends to meet the requirements of the Weld County supplementary regulations concerning geologic hazards. The PUD is not located within any known geologic hazard areas as defined by the Geologic Hazard Map adopted by Weld County on April 19, 1978. 15 . A sign shall be posted on the property under consideration for PUD rezoning. The sign shall be posted by the applicant, who shall certify that the sign has been posted for at least ten (10 ) days preceding the hearing date. The sign shall be provided by the Department of Planning Services. The required sign will be posted by the applicant and the affidavit will be forwarded to the County at that time. 16. A certified list of the names, addresses and the corresponding parcel identification number assigned by the Weld County Assessor of the owners of property (the surface estate) within five hundred (500) feet of the property subject to the appli- cation. The source of such list shall be the records of the Weld County Assessor, or an ownership update from a title or abstract company or attorney, derived from such records, or from the records of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. If the list was assembled from the records of the Weld County Assessor, the applicant shall certify that such list was assembled within thirty ( 30) days of the application submis- sion date. A certified list of property owners within 500 feet of the property was prepared by Nelson Engineers and is attached. 17 . A certified list of the names and addresses of mineral owners and lessees of mineral owners on or under the parcel of land being considered. The source of such list shall be assembled from the records of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder, or from an ownership update derived from such records of a title or abstract company or prepared by an attorney derived from such records. A certified list of the names and addresses of mineral owners and leases of mineral owners on or under the parcel was pre- pared by Nelson Engineers and is attached. 18. Such additional information as may be required by the Depart- ment of Planning Services, the Planning Commissioner, or the Board of County Commissioners in order to determine that the application meets the goals, policies, and standards set forth in the Weld County Zoning Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan. LEGAL DESCRIPTION 27:; 3S LEGAL DESCRIPTION A TRACT OF LAND LOCATED IN PART OF THE SOUTH HALF (S-1/2 ) OF SECTION 5 AND THE NORTH HALF (N-1/2) OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO; MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 8 AND CONSIDER- ING THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW-1/4 ) OF SAID SECTION 8 TO BEAR SOUTH 88°18 ' 18" EAST WITH ALL OTHER BEARINGS RELATIVE THERETO; THENCE SOUTH 00°38 ' 22" EAST, 139 .70 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW-1/4 ) OF SECTION 8 TO THE SOUTH RIGHT- OF-WAY LINE OF COLORADO STATE HIGHWAY 119, AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY NORTH 88°15 ' 44" EAST, 2666.15 FEET TO A POINT IN SECTION 5 FROM WHENCE THE NORTH QUARTER (N-1/4) OF SECTION 8 BEARS SOUTH 01°19 ' 44" WEST AT A DISTANCE OF 20.06 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING THROUGH SECTION 5, NORTH 88°17 ' 55" EAST, 857 .51 FEET TO A CURVE; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WHOSE CENTRAL ANGLE IS 08° 54"28" , RADIUS IS 5630. 00 FEET AND WHOSE LONG CHORD BEARS SOUTH 87°14 ' 51" EAST, 874 .41 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 80°55 '12" EAST, 263 . 40 FEET TO A POINT OF DEPAR- TURE FROM THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY OF COLORADO STATE HIGHWAY 119 AND THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF A PARCEL DESCRIBED IN WELD COUNTY RECORDS UNDER BOOK 1163, RECEPTION NO. 02107318 ; THENCE SOUTH 09°04 ' 48" WEST, 89. 04 FEET ACROSS THE NORTH LINE OF SECTION 8 TO A CURVE; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT WHOSE CENTRAL ANGLE IS 11° 09°30" , RADIUS IS 360.00 FEET AND WHOSE LONG CHORD BEARS SOUTH 39°55 ' 04" EAST, 70.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 34°20 ' 19" EAST, 240. 00 FEET TO A CURVE; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT WHOSE CENTRAL ANGLE IS 55° 15 ' 00" , RADIUS IS 220. 00 FEET AND WHOSE LONG CHORD BEARS SOUTH 61°57 ' 49" EAST, 204. 02 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°35 ' 19" EAST, 260.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF A PARCEL DESCRIBED IN WELD COUNTY RECORDS UNDER BOOK 1163, RECEPTION NO. 02107318 ; THENCE NORTH 00°24 ' 41" EAST, 353. 24 FEET TO THE SOUTH RIGHT- OF-WAY OF COLORADO STATE HIGHWAY 119 ; THENCE ALONG A NONCONTINUOUS CURVE TO THE LEFT WHOSE CENTRAL ANGLE IS 0°27 ' 45" , RADIUS IS 5603 . 23 FEET AND WHOSE LONG CHORD BEARS SOUTH 85°01 ' 21" EAST, 45. 22 FEET TO ANOTHER CURVE; THENCE ALONG ANOTHER NONCONTINUOUS CURVE TO THE LEFT WHOSE CENTRAL ANGLE IS 00°01 ' 30" , RADIUS IS 34 , 377 . 47 FEET AND WHOSE LONG CHORD BEARS SOUTH 85°13 ' 46" EAST, 14 . 97 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SECTION 8 FROM WHENCE THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SEC- TION BEARS NORTH 00°24 ' 41" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 31. 50 FEET; e2C93S, THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 8, SOUTH 00°24" 41" WEST 408. 50 FEET TO A POINT DESCRIBED AS THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF A PARCEL IN WELD COUNTY RECORDS, BOOK 1258, RECEPTION NO. 02207878 ; THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID DESCRIBED PARCEL NORTH 89°35 ' 19" WEST, 320.00 FEET TO A CURVE; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT WHOSE CENTRAL ANGLE IS 20°00 ' 00" , RADIUS IS 220. 00 FEET AND WHOSE LONG CHORD BEARS SOUTH 80°24 ' 41" WEST, 76 .40 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 70°24 ' 41" WEST, 177.75 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°24 ' 41" WEST, 784 .67 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTH HALF (N-1/2, N-1/2) OF SECTION 8 AND THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF PARCEL DESCRIBED IN WELD COUNTY RECORDS UNDER BOOK 1258, RECEPTION NO. 02207878 ; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH HALF OF THE NORTH HALF (N-1/2,N-1/2 ) NORTH 88°09 ' 42" WEST, 2099.14 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF NORTHWEST QUARTER, NORTHWEST QUARTER (SW COR OF NW-1/4, NE-1/4 ) OF SECTION 8 ; THENCE NORTH 88°20 ' 51" WEST, 2642 . 82 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (SW COR, NW-1/4, NW-1/4 ) OF SECTION 8; THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 8 NORTH 00°38 ' 22" WEST, 1186 .42 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID TRACT OF LAND CONTAINS 144 .887 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. TOGETHER WITH AND SUBJECT TO ALL EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS-OF-WAY EXISTING AND/OR OF PUBLIC RECORD. Criore i4ry PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CHANGE OF ZONE AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS MINERALS AND/OR SUBSURFACE ESTATE Legal Description: N-1/2, N-1/2 of Section 8, S-1/2, S-1/2 of Section 5 all in Township 2 North, Range 68 West, Weld County, Colorado STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS COUNTY OF WELD ) THE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn, states that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names and addresses of all mineral owners and lessees of mineral owners on or under the parcel of land under as their names appear upon the records in the Weld County Clerk and Recorder's Office or from an ownership update from a title or abstract company or an attorney. The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me this 27thday of November 1991. WITNESS my hand and official seal. lv P lic() J Notary Public J My Commission Expires: April 13, 1993 Minerals and/or Subsurface Estate The Anschutz Corporation, Inc. 555 17th Street Denver, Colorado Calvin Petroleum Corporation 145 First Street Fort Lupton, Colorado 80916 a./e:' '?3 I''..' :a ' PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CHANGE OF ZONE AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS SURFACE ESTATE Commission expires Legal Description: N-1/2, N-1/2 of Section 8, and S-1/2, S-1/2 of Section 5, all in Township 2 North, RAnge 68 West, Weld County, Colroado STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS COUNTY OF WELD THE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn, states that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names, addresses, and the corresponding Parcel Identification Number assigned by the Weld County Assessor of the owners' of property (the surface estate) within five hundred feet of the property under consideration This list was compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor, or an ownership update from a title or abstract company or attorney, derived from such records, or from the records of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. The list compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor shall have been assembled within thirty days of the application's submission date. (-4111491.72,q, The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me this 27th day November , 19 91 . WITNESS my hand and official seal. Notaaryry NoP Public My Commission Expires: April 13, 1993 r1V.< s PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CHANCE OF ZONE NAMES OF OWNERS OF PROPERTY WITHIN 500 FEET Please print or type NAME ADDRESS, TOWN/CITY, ASSESSOR'S PARCEL STATE AND ZIP CODE IDENTIFICATION # Helton, Ramona H. 0545 State Hwy. 119 1313 06 000 017 Longmont, CO 80504 Mayeda, ueorge I. & Sumiye 10702 WCR 1 1313 05 000 047 Mayeda, John Y. & Betty K. Longmont, CO 80501 Johnson, Barbara J. 1715 Harward 1313 06 000 048 Longmont, CO 80501 JCK Ltd . 4465 Pioneer Drive 1313 06 000 001 • % Catherine Hamm Oliver Greeley, CO 80634 JCK Ltd 4465 Pioneer Drive 1313 04 000 042 — % Catherine Hamm Oliver Greeley, CO 80634 Bigelow, Andrea P. 990 East State Hwy. 119 1313 07 000 026 Longmont, CO 80504 Bigelow, Andrea P. 990 East State Hwy. 119 1313 07 000 004 Longmont, CO 80504 Ayers, Margaret 0966 East State Hwy. 119 1313 08 000 034 Longmont, CO 80504 — Bigelow, Andrea P. 990 East State Hwy. 119 1313 08 000 028 Longmont, CO 80504 Hayes, Charles R. & 998 East State Hwy. 119 1313 08 000 033 Shirli Mae Longmont, CO 80504 City of Longmont 408 3rd Avenue 1313 08 000 032 Longmont, CO 80501 City of Longmont 408 3rd Avenue 1313 08 000 031 Longmont, CO 80501 City of Longmont 408 3rd Avenue 1313 08 000 044 Longmont, CO 80501 — Peterson, Ernest L. 12963 Hilcrest Dr. 1313 09 000 001 Longmont, CO 80501 St. Vrain Ltd . 8200 West 67th 1313 09 000 002 _ % Richard Domencio Arvada. CO 80604 Temperature Processing 10477 WCR 7 1313 09 000 003 Co. , Inc. Longmont. CO 80501 Baldridge, Donald W. 3215 Wade Circle 1313 08 000 035 & Adele A. Colorado Springs, CO 80917 7-JJ29S EXHIBIT "D" SOILS SURVEY OF WELD COUNTY, COLORADO (SOUTHERN PART) .gp S20 '3 'S TJA 'rr � rr 2 t �ek p' .< a• 82 �+`Y'§' a n▪� Y, ... --_,-.---4. .. J "Ay R S Rl k f : .1 i.?`,,.. c }u g -,,-.+ � ^f,A kr . ,"s ., 'EL. r .. je 164 •} to Wi �^ ;"F1. ',..-„,‘..-,a,^ '' ,'" �y"M.,�,�v� �` Si iEP i tic.. � a 82 rya r*c en itinit..41:7ys' � ",'t;- _ I :m 7 ' ▪ y 11:'G`E1 ":144)1' w e' Sir .. is r'r. �i 9WAy a^ �� 1 ▪t y, ? ' 1 y 82 j' i~i 82 `G r'.*"..,;:t:.". }Y7 1 1 a • Y'' 6 .,y.� 42 i sC �'"'' ` ,� a 1t • [r,. '� 'N'... '0'a4 lal^ f / 111 / v• may'* i' 65 a..nr.....—r{�+82 N �1t' a51 S IrI r • 1: '•“•1,•,.“.. 1. 1� >, ;k ' - t I f i F J 5 '..":7t-t;'?' , 92' 5 • 8 ) uS r ? .2,.„.,i..�K k MI 41 ...2 82 ' Kam'• M.a` 5 '* _ 7 I.*t pV 27 Y 1 f t1 . 2 ` i� `:“; • a.. 1, O 4x JYYt. '4L�A # r tt •. s' 4^ YF,..IVW �. ikr +a sum �..I"er�'•"[f t ₹"Pr.'''. �.�`x •Yu 4 .}' Ern•l;y ?.'r' N' r.,' ' ,aF ir. '-,.7,"7:44 ?jt 4` ^* 5 yA F'a.€ca. / GREAT , - 6 42; SCALE /" 2000 I47 42 # \` V LON�MI ' 83 .!"71,„2,-‘5184-. . . Y 1 < d g• �yi;o 4 { 4 r ..,. • _ � z• "It-ICY v L/ Ip rk`' t 414 � ••! • (� i82 s *Cy - '"� s • ',y,'a,t r • o ittliftlita +J, r',,, R.., ^,, S v , y}-%_ v^ w``—..„,+ •`F'43,.,--,,,, n` F 1'' a F s9 '.,,. — y � G .eE"°JR iy, t . (`.' • t-t . d., _ �f, 2 "4 ac cti 83 � y yr - 1 r�� r,�`% 'r � C 8 ''. �` - /ti Ir�� 't.T iv �"{f t..� �f RICHARDSON PUD .c 1.41','` W I I." 10 ".k'• '` .3,}L. O% �. 1 " t4uy " it V 40'f`tt ❑ �� " �" 1r,".% 4V f�� 3'i , ' -13,%.%"1&%,4-41.4-..,.;4:-"'ft' (.� � 1 ',"'4 h = 4 ,1 4 Le; "V _r � � %y e /„� }.2. 1R Y r y� i oJ'.:�7 lof 1 / jm tt �°ti rte,-;',/.. f rr � �< 1 irk,:, ', k ti •ra MA, r4 � w '�� x tli r' °, z �} �' vs 19^� fhc , 4 +' y A ,q4-44t'.? ' i •� yy.. L' -41.-3.,„,,,.sIx` I 1 i .Vne�g .w«w..�.N ',• yri aaY / 3'.(yA+tµ�""4�a` / r *•,,,--.,. w }° ,3`••- ��. .;�: �v . �'f. 1r""r vY m - .�rrrtFFF� a s -.vela" a y J rEi 7 i {l f 1 )� s 6r+. _ .C a t§.`..-' '�ry ,1",. ` t'. .--I`. yea V4 1 . 6 y ft 1 *' y bit' ..,“1.,t -,,,r,.,.,:,,;.•,,,,,,,, � � �, � ` � , t f l�e/ k• 1 'i' )V ay t.• a A v 1»IJ ro I I- , '... f N " „ a � � 7 � t' �_ tq . 30� s �]:: -sLD COUNTY, COLORADO, SOUTHERN PAR', 11 .•• .•• ••• : . • •• - •, e+mi•: :- .. cover. For pheasants, undisturbed nesting cover is essen- T s that are best suited and have good survival re tial and should be included in plans for habitat develop- Rock Mountain juniper, eastern redcedar, po .erosa ment, especially in areas of intensive agriculture. pine, .erian elm, Russian-olive, and hackb y. The This soil has good potential for urban and recreational - shrubs be suited are skunkbush sumac, lilac .nd Siberi- development. Increased population growth in the survey an peashrub. area has resulted in increased homesite construction. The Wildlife is an 'mportant secondary us: of this soil. The chief limiting soil features for urban development are the cropland areas pr ide favorable ha.' .t for ring-necked shrink-swell potential of the subsoil as it wets and dries - pheasant and mourns : dove. Man, nongame species can and the limited ability of this soil to support a load. Septic be attracted by establis •ng are for nesting and escape tank absorption fields function properly, but community cover. For pheasants, undi .ed nesting cover is essen- sewage systems should be provided if the population den- tial and should be include• i .lans for habitat develop- sity increases. Because of the moderately rapid permea- ment. Rangeland wildlife, for e ple, the pronghorn an- bility of the substratum, sewage lagoons must be sealed. telope, can be attrac ' . by develo g livestock watering Lawns, shrubs, and trees grow well. Capability class I ir- facilities, managi livestock gran' :, and reseeding rigated. 'where needed. Few areas • this Ascalon soil are in ma growth and ell drained soil on terraces at elevations of 4,500 to 4,'.i urbanized enters. The shrink-swell potential the sub- fee . It formed in alluvium deposited by the major ri ers soil as wets and dries is the most limiting so feature in t' • survey area. Included in mapping are small .real that ust be considered in planning homesites an. con- µher- sand and gravel are within a depth of 60 ' ches. st•.cting roads. Capability subclass IVe nanirriga.:.; Also in luded are small areas of soils that clayhay:,n.y-Pl:ina range ai•-. a loam subsoil. 8—Ascalon loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes. This is a deep, Typica the surface layer of this Ascalon se is brown well drained soil on terraces at elevations of 4,500 to 4,900 loam about 0 inches thick. The subsoil is brs n and yel- feet. It formed in alluvium deposited by the major rivers lowish brow sandy clay loam about 15 inc. •s thick. The in the survey area. Included in mapping are small areas substratum to a depth of 60 inches is c. careous sandy where sand and gravel are within a depth of 60 inches. loam. Also included are small areas of soils that have a clay Permeability i• moderate. Available • ater capacity is loam subsoil. high. The effecti - rooting depth is :0 inches or more. Typcially the surface layer of this Ascalon soil is brown Surface runoff is m:dium, and the en ion hazard is low. - loam about 10 inches thick. The subsoil is brown and yel- This soil is used . . ost entirely 'or irrigated crops. It lowish brown sandy clay loam about 15 inches thick. The is suited to all crops c. monly to a depth 60 inches is calcareous sandy loam. P Y cwn in the area, includ- ing corn, sugar beets, .t.ns, alf. .a, small grain, potatoes, Permeability is moderate. Available water capacity is high. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. and onions. An example o a s .ble cropping system is 3 Surface runoff is slow, and the erosion hazard is low. to 4 years of alfalfa foils a-, by corn, corn for silage, This soil is used almost entirely for irrigated crops. It sugar beets, small grain, o beans. Land leveling, ditch is suited to all crops commonly grown in the area, includ- lining, and installing pipelire- may be needed for proper ing corn, sugar beets, beans, alfalfa, small grain, potatoes, water application. and onions. An example of a suitable cropping system is 3 All methods of irriga ion are suitable, but furrow ir- to 4 years of alfalfa followed by corn, corn for silage, rigation is the most co mon. B. •yard manure and com- sugar beets, small grain, or beans. Few conservation prac- mercial fertilizer are .ceded for to. yields. tices are needed to maintain top yields. Windbreaks and : vironmental p ntings of trees and All methods of irrigation are suitable, but furrow ir- shrubs commonly _ own in the area are generally well rigation is the most common. Barnyard manure and com- suited to this -.1 Cultivation to .ontrol competing mercial fertilizer are needed for top yields. vegetation sho d be continued for as many years as Windbreaks and environmental plantings are generally possible follow' g planting. Trees that are .est suited and well suited to this soil. Cultivation to control competing have good s ival are Rocky Mountain j iper, eastern - vegetation should be continued for as many years as redcedar, p. derosa pine, Siberian elm, Russ :nolive, and possible following planting. Trees that are best suited and hackberry. he shrubs best suited are skunk. sh sumac, have good survival are Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern lilac, Sib•. an peashrub, and American plum. redcedar, ponderosa pine, Siberian elm, Russian-olive, and Wild • e is an important secondary use of this .oil. The hackberry. The shrubs best suited are skunkbush sumac, cropland areas provide favorable habitat for ring ecked lilac, Siberian peashrub, and American plum. phea•.nt and mourning dove. Many nongame speck can Wildlife is an important secondary use of this soil. The be . tracted by establishing areas for nesting and escape cropland areas provide favorable habitat for ring-necked co er. For pheasants, undisturbed nesting cover is ess:n- pheasant and mourning dove. Many nongame species can t'al and should be included in plans for habitat develo.- be attracted by establishing areas for nesting and escape ent, especially in areas-ef-intensive--ag4eultur-e.— 07. 99i . . <".. e . . ..• .,,.... WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, SOUTHERN PART 15 — .igating close grown crops and pasture S,,rows, conto. ' of 4,850 to 5,050 feet. It formed in calcareous eolian rows, and cross slope furrows are suitable for r. deposits. Included in mapping are small areas of soils that cr. .s. Sprinkler irrigation is also desirable. Keeping il- have fine sandy loam or loam underlying material and — lag to a minimum and utilizing crop residue help to on- small areas of soils that are shallow to moderately deep trol erosion. Maintaining fertility is important. •rops over shale and sandstone. resp•.d to applications of phosphorus and nitrogen. Typically the surface layer of this Colby soil is pale In n•nirrigated areas this soil is suited to winter heat. brown loam about 7 inches thick. The underlying material — The p •dicted average yield is 28 bushels per a•re. The is very pale brown silt loam to a depth of 60 inches. soil is ummer fallowed in alternate years o allow Permeability is moderate. Available water capacity is moisture :ccumulation. Generally'precipitation s too low high. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. for benefi•'al use of fertilizer. Surface runoff is rapid, and the erosion hazard is high. - Stubble ulch fanning, striperopping, and • inimum til- This soil is suited to limited cropping. Intensive lage are needed to control soil blowing and ater erosion. cropping is hazardous because of erosion. The cropping Terracing al • may be needed to control wa er erosion. system should be limited to close grown crops, such as al- The potenti native vegetation is do hated by blue falfa, wheat, and barley. This soil also is suited to ir- grama. Several id grasses, such as we em wheatgrass rigated pasture. A suitable cropping system is 3 to 4 and needleandth ead, are also present. otential produc- years of alfalfa followed by 2 years of corn and small tion ranges from ,600 pounds per acre n favorable years grain and alfalfa seeded with a nurse crop. — to 1,000 pounds in unfavorable years. As range condition Close grown crops can be irrigated from closely spaced deteriorates, the m . grasses decre. .'; blue grams, buf- contour ditches or sprinklers. Contour furrows or sprin- falograss, snakewee yucca, and f 'nged sage increase; klers should be used for new crops. Applications of and forage productio drops. Und: irable weeds and an- nitrogen and phosphorus help in maintaining good produc- nuals invade the site a range condition becomes poorer. tion. Management of vegetation on is soil should be based The potential native vegetation is dominated by blue on taking half and leavi half . the total annual produc- grama. Sideoats grams, little bluestem, western wheat- __ tion. Seeding is desirable th• range is in poor condition. grass, and sedge are also prominent. Potential production Sideoats grams, little blue - , western wheatgrass, blue ranges from 1,800 pounds per acre in favorable years to grams, pubescent wheatgr. ;, and crested wheatgrass are 1,500 pounds in unfavorable years. As range condition suitable for seeding. The s selected should meet the deteriorates, the sideoats grama and little bluestem — seasonal requirements of ' e tock. It can be seeded into decrease, forage production drops, and blue grams, buf- a clean, firm sorghum st •ble, or it can be drilled into a falograss, and several perennial forbs and shrubs in- firm prepared seedbed Seed g early in spring has crease. Undesirable weeds and annuals invade the site as proven most successful. range condition becomes poorer. Windbreaks and en ronmen . plantings of trees and Management should be based on taking half and leaving shrubs commonly gr in the a ea are generally well half of the total annual production. Seeding is desirable if suited to this soil Cultivation •. control competing the range is in poor condition. Sideoats grams, little _ vegetation should .e continued fo as many years as bluestem, western wheatgrass, and pubescent wheatgrass possible following .lanting. Trees that are best suited and are suitable for seeding. The grass selected should meet have good survivaI are Rocky Moun . juniper, eastern the seasonal needs of livestock. It can be seeded into a redcedar, ponde •sa pine, Siberian elm, 'ussian-olive, and clean, firm sorghum stubble, or it can be drilled into a —. hackberry. The shrubs best suited are s unkbush sumac, firm prepared seedbed. Plowing and drilling should be on lilac, Siberian ashrub, and American pl . the contour to minimize runoff and soil losses. Seeding Openland "Idlife, such as pheasant, •urning dove, early in spring has proven most successfuL and cotton . and rangeland wildlife, suc as antelope, Windbreaks and environmental plantings of trees and cottontail, . d coyote, are best suited to thi soil. Under shrubs commonly grown in the area are generally well irrigation, good wildlife habitat can be •stablished, suited to this soil. Cultivation to control competing benefitin. many kinds of openland wildl' .. Forage vegetation should be continued for as many years as producti,n is typically low on rangeland, an.. grazing possible following planting. Trees that are best suited and manag: ent is needed if livestock and wildlife s are the have good survival are Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern range. Livestock watering facilities also are uti •ed by redcedar, ponderosa pine, Siberian elm, Russian-olive, and vario•s wildlife species. hackberry. The shrubs best suited are skunkbush sumac, T•is soil has good potential for urban and recrea "onal lilac, Siberian peashrub, and American plum. de elopments. Road design can be modified to com en- Openland wildlife, such as pheasant, mourning dove, s: e for the limited capacity of this soil to support a 1•:d. and cottontail, and rangeland wildlife, such as antelope, •apability subclass IIIe irrigated, IVe nonirrigate.; cottontail, and coyote, are best suited to this soil. Under •-"• y •lama r:ngc oitc. irrigation, good wildlife habitat can be established, 17—Colby loam, 5 to 9 percent slopes. This is a deep, benefiting many kinds of openland wildlife. Forage well drained soil on upland hills and ridges at elevations production is typically low on rangeland, and grazing e� O99 R 16 SOIL SURVEY management is needed if livestock and wildlife share the ••• • •- = • .: . •: .- ""•'.• •. ' - - range. Livestock watering facilities also are utilized by sorghum stubble, or it can be drilled into a firm prepar d various wildlife species. se-dbed. Plowing and drilling should be on the contour to This soil has good potential for urban and recreational mi imize runoff and soil losses. Seeding early in sp "rig developments. Road design can be modified to compen- has proven most successsful. Capability subclass IVe sate for the limited capacity of this soil to support a load. noni 'gated; Colby soil in Loamy Slopes rang: site, Capability subclass IVe irrigated, VIe nonirrigated; Aden. soil in Loamy Plains range site. Loamy Slopes range site. 19— olombo clay loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes This is • _ , - „ - -• . . - . • •-. a deep, well drained soil on flood plains and to races at •ently sloping to moderately sloping soils are on plain., elevation. of 4,600 to 4,780 feet. It formed in stratified . Is, and ridges at elevations of 4,750 to 4,900 feet. T. e calcareou- alluvium. Included in mapping are • all areas C• by soil, which makes up about 55 percent of the ap of soils th.t have a loam surface layer and some small uni• occupies the steeper, convex parts of the land ape. leveled are. .. _ The :dena soil, about 30 percent of the unit, occup••s the Typically t e surface layer of this Colom • soil is dark less s eep, slightly concave parts. About 15 pe• ent is grayish brow clay loam about 14 inches t ck. The upper Kim lo. and Weld loam. 7 inches of he underlying material s pale brown The ••lby soil is deep and well drained. It •ormed in stratified clay loam and loam. The lowed part to a depth. calcareou- eolian deposits. Typically the surf. e layer is of 60 inches is v•ry pale brown loam s .tified with thin pale brow loam about 7 inches thick. Th: underlying lenses of fine san.. medium sand, and • ay loam. material to : depth of 60 inches is very p. e brown silt Permeability is oderate. Availab • water capacity is loam. high. The effective rooting depth i• 60 inches or more. Permeabilit, is moderate. Available w ter capacity is Surface runoff is slo• , and the erns'.n hazard is low. high. The effe• ive rooting depth is 60 inches or more. In irrigated areas ' is soil is s - -d to crops commonly Surface runoff i•rapid, and the erosion azard is high. grown in the area, sue, as corn, - gar beets, beans, alfal- _ The Adena so also is deep and well drained and fa, onions, and potatoes. formed in calcareo - eolian deposits. •ically the surface All methods of irrigat in th. are common to the area layer is brown loa about 6 inche- thick. The subsoil is are used. Borders are sui•.ble or small grain, alfalfa, and brown and very pa : brown cla loam about 3 inches pasture. Furrow irrigatio • used for row crops. Crops thick. The substratum o a depth •f 60 inches is very pale respond to application of ni •fgen and phosphorus. brown silt loam. Windbreaks and enviro '-ntal plantings of trees and Permeability is slow. vaila,. e water capacity is high. shrubs commonly grown - • e area are generally well The effective rooting dep• i 60 inches or more. Surface suited to this soiL C 'vat in to control competing runoff is medium,and the - .sion hazard is moderate. vegetation should be co ntinue•• for as many years as This unit is used for no • gated cropland and range- possible following plant, g. Tree- that are best suited and land. It is suited to win : heat, barley, and sorghum. have good survival ar• Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern — Most of the acreage is flan •• to winter wheat and is redcedar, ponderosa r e, Siberian -lm, Russian-olive, and summer fallowed in al : ate y:.rs to allow moisture ac- hackberry. The sh is best suited .re skunkbush sumac, cumulation. Generally •recipitati. is too low for benefi- lilac, Siberian peas b, and America' plum. vial use of fertilizer. Wildlife is an mportant seconda use of this soil. Stubble mulch f. ing, striperop••ng, and minimum til- Ring-necked ph-:sant, mourning dov,, and many non- lage are needed to ontrol soil blowi • and water erosion. game species .. be attracted by esta•lishing areas for Terracing also mar be needed to cont •1 water erosion. nesting and nape cover. For pheasa•ts, undisturbed The potentia native vegetation in this unit is nesting cover s essential and should be i eluded in plans dominated by b e grama. Sideoats gram•, little bluestem, for habitat d•velopment, especially in are. of intensive and western ' heatgrass are also prom ent. Potential agriculture. production r. ges from 1,800 pounds per .cre in favora- Where t s soil is on flood plains and is s sceptible to ble years to 1,100 pounds in unfavorable ye.rs. As range flooding i has poor potential for urban and ecreational condition eteriorates, the sideoats gram• and little develop -nt. On the higher terraces the poten ial is fair. bluestem decrease, forage production drops, and blue Dwellin: and road designs need to be mod' I•d to in- grama, .uffalograss, and several perennial orbs and crease he capacity of the soil to support a loa• and to shrubs ncrease. Undesirable weeds and annual invade protec it against frost action. Capability subclass IIw ir- the si • as range condition becomes poorer. rigat:d. M. agement should be based on taking half and .wing 20 Colombo clay loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes. is is half of the total annual production. Seeding is desira le if a ••ep, well drained soil on flood plains and terraces al th. range is in poor condition. Sideoats grama, I tle el:vations of 4,600 and 4,780 feet. It formed in strati lee b estem, western wheatgrass, bluegrama, pubesc• t calcareous alluvium. Included in mapping are small aria: heatgrass, and crested wheatgrass are suitable for see. .f soils that have a loam surface layer. Some sm.. r 28 SOIL SURVEY ._. . . -. . . . . . . . .. . - e--eentirwed for as man we I drained soil on terraces at elevations of 4,550 to 5,004 p sible following planting. Trees that are best suited d feet It formed in mixed alluvium. Included in mappi g hay good survival are Rocky Mountain juniper, ea ern _ are mall, long and narrow areas of sand and gr. el redce r, ponderosa pine, Siberian elm, Russian-ol' e, and depos is and small areas of soils that are subject to . ca- hackber . The shrubs best suited are skunkbu sumac, sional Hooding. Some leveled areas are also included. lilac, Sibe ' n peashrub, and American plum. Typically the surface layer of this Nunn soil is y ayish Wildlife is n important secondary use of his soil. The brown 1..m about 12 inches thick. The subsoil • light cropland areas rovide favorable habitat or ring-necked brownish :ray clay loam about 12 inches thick. T e upper pheasant and m ruing dove. Many no ame species can part of the substratum is light brownish gray ay loam. be attracted by es blishing areas fo nesting and escape The lower 'art to a depth of 60 inches is br. n sandy cover. For pheasants, ndisturbed esting cover is essen- - loam. tial and should be incl ed in p ns for habitat develop- Permeabilil is moderately slow. Avai ble water ment, especially in areas f i nsive agriculture. Range- capacity is hi:- . The effective rooting dept is 60 inches land wildlife, for example, t pronghorn antelope, can be or more. Su :ce runoff is medium, an. the erosion attracted by developing li stock watering facilities, hazard is low. managing livestock grai g, and eseeding where needed. In irrigated a •as this soil is suited t' all crops com- This soil has fair t poor pote 'al for urban develop- monly grown in he area, including c. , sugar beets, ment. It has moder e to high shrin swell, low strength, _ beans, alfalfa, smal grain, potatoes, an. onions. An exam- and moderately w permeability. Th e features create ple of a suitable cropping system is 3 • 4 years of alfalfa problems in d !ling and road construe • n. Those areas followed by corn, co ' for silage, sug- beets, small grain, that have lo or sandy loam in the low part of the or beans. Generally -uch characte stics as a high clay substratu are suitable for septic tank abso tion fields content or a rapidl permeable substratum slightly and fou ations. Some areas of this soil are a 'acent to restrict some crops. strea and are subject to occasional flooding. Th poten- All methods of irriga:on are uitable, but furrow ir- tial . fair for such recreational development as cam and rigation is the most co 'mon. 'roper irrigation water p' 'c areas and playgrounds. Capability subclass IIe 'r- management is essential. c art and manure and commer- ' • ins-range-s' - cial fertilizer are needed fo . . yields. 41—Nunn clay loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes. This is a Most nonirrigated areas a.- used for small grain. The deep, well drained soil on terraces and smooth plains at soil is summer fallowed in . e•rnate years. Winter wheat elevations of 4,550 to 5,150 feet. It formed in mixed allu- is the principal crop. If t e • op is winterkilled, spring vium and eolian deposits. Included in mapping are small, wheat can be seeded. Ge eral precipitation is too low long and narrow areas of sand and gravel deposits and for beneficial use of ferti. -r. small areas of soils that are subject to occasional flooding. Such practices as stu. ale mule' farming, striperopping, Some small leveled areas are also included. and minimum tillage ..e needed . control soil blowing Typically the surface layer of this Nunn soil is grayish and water erosion. brown clay loam about 9 inches thick. The subsoil is light The potential nati e vegetation t •dominated by blue brownish gray clay loam about 14 inches thick. The upper grama. Several mid grasses, such as estern wheatgrass part of the substratum is clay loam. The lower part to a and needleandthre.d, are also presen. Potential produc- depth of 60 inches is sandy loam- tion ranges from ,600 pounds per acre 'n favorable years Permeability is moderately slow. Available water to 1,000 pounds - unfavorable years. A range condition capacity is high. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches deteriorates, th. mid grasses decrease; • ue grama, buf- or more. Surface runoff is slow, and the erosion hazard is falograss, sna •weed, yucca, and fringed sage increase; low. and forage pi-eduction drops. Undesirable eeds and an- This soil is used almost entirely for irrigated crops. It nuals invade e site as range condition beco- es poorer. is suited to all crops commonly grown in the area, includ- Managem,nt of vegetation on this soil sho Id be based ing corn, sugar beets, beans, alfalfa, small grain, potatoes, on taking :If and leaving half of the total an al produc- and onions. An example of a suitable cropping system is 3 tion. Seed' g is desirable if the range is in poo condition. to 4 years of alfalfa followed by corn, corn for silage, Sideoats : ama, little bluestem, western wheat: ass, blue sugar beets, small grain, or beans. Few conservation prac- grama, r ubescent wheatgrass, and crested wheat:' .ss are tices are needed to maintain top yields. suitabl: for seeding. The grass selected should -et the All methods of irrigation are suitable, but furrow ir- - seaso .1 requirements of livestock. It can be seed'. into rigation is the most common. Barnyard manure and com- a cle-n, firm sorghum stubble, or it can be drilled to a mercial fertilizer are needed for top yields. fi prepared seedbed. Seeding early in spring has Windbreaks and environmental plantings of trees and pr. en most successful. shrubs commonly grown in the area are generally well indbreaks and environmental plantings of trees a d suited to this soil. Cultivation to control competing rubs commonly grown in the area are generally w: I vegetation should be continued for as many years as : .: - -,- - . • . . . • ., ,ntro .• , ••- possible following planting. Trees that are best suited and (3P'^ ;3 N-LB COUNTY, COLORADO, SOUTHERN PART 29 — have good survival are Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern The potential native vegetation is dominated by redcedar, ponderosa pine, Siberian elm, Russian-olive, and western wheatgrass and blue grama. Buffalograss is also hackberry. The shrubs best suited are skunkbush sumac, present. Potential production ranges from 1,000 pounds lilac, Siberian peashrub, and American plum. per acre in favorable years to 600 pounds in unfavorable Wildlife is an important secondary use of this soil. The years. As range condition deteriorates, a blue grama-buf- cropland areas provide favorable habitat for ring-necked falograss sod forms. Undesirable weeds and annuals in- pheasant and mourning dove. Many nongame species can vade the site as range condition becomes poorer. _ be attracted by establishing areas for nesting and escape Management of vegetation of this soil should be based cover. For pheasants, undisturbed nesting cover is essen- on taking half and leaving half of the total annual produc- tial and should be included in plans for habitat develop- tion. Range pitting can help in reducing runoff. Seeding is ment, especially in areas of intensive agriculture. desirable if the range is in poor condition. Western — This soil has fair to poor potential for urban develop- wheatgrass, blue grama, sideoats grama, buffalograss, pu- ment. It has moderate to high shrink swell, low strength, bescent wheatgrass, and crested wheatgrass are suitable and moderately slow permeability. These features create for seeding. The grass selected should meet the seasonal problems in dwelling and road construction. Those areas requirements of livestock. It can be seeded into a clean, that have loam or sandy loam in the lower part of the firm sorghum stubble, or it can be drilled into a firm substratum are suitable for septic tank absorption fields prepared seedbed. Seeding early in spring has proven and foundations. Some areas of this soil are adjacent to most successful. streams and are subject to occasional flooding. The poten- Windbreaks and environmental plantings are generally tial is fair for such recreational development as camp and well suited to this soil. Cultivation to control competing picnic areas and playgrounds. Capability class I irrigated. vegetation should be continued for as many years as 42—Nunn clay loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes. This is a possible following planting. Trees that are best suited and — deep, well drained soil on terraces and smooth plains at have good survival are Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern elevations of 4,550 to 5,150 feet. It formed in mixed allu- redcedar, ponderosa pine, Siberian elm, Russianolive, and vium and eolian deposits. Included in mapping are small, hackberry. The shrubs best suited are skunkbush sumac, long and narrow areas of sand and gravel deposits and lilac, Siberian peashrub, and American plum. small areas of soils that are subject to occasional flooding. Wildlife is an important secondary use of this soil. The Some leveled areas are also included. cropland areas provide favorable habitat for ring-necked Typically the surface layer of this Nunn soil is grayish pheasant and mourning dove. Many nongame species can —. brown clay loam aobut 9 inches thick. The subsoil is light be attracted by establishing areas for nesting and escape brownish gray clay loam about 14 inches thick. The upper cover. For pheasants, undisturbed nesting cover is essen- • part of the substratum is light brownish gray clay loam. tial and should be included in plans for habitat develop- , The lower part to a depth of 60 inches is brown sandy ment, especially in areas of intensive agriculture. Range- loam. land wildlife, for example, the pronghorn'antelope, can be } Permeability is moderately slow. Available water attracted by developing livestock watering facilities, t capacity is high. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches managing livestock grazing, and reseeding where needed. ! or more. Surface runoff is medium, and the erosion This soil has fair to poor potential for urban develop- hazard is low. ment. It has moderate to high shrink swell, low strength, In irrigated areas this soil is suited to all crops corn- and moderately slow permeability. These features create monly grown in the area, including corn, sugar beets, problems in dwelling and road construction. Those areas - beans, alfalfa, small grain, potatoes, and onions. An exam- that have loam or sandy loam in the lower part of the ple of a suitable cropping system is 3 to 4 years of alfalfa substratum are suitable for septic tank absorption fields followed by corn, corn for silage, sugar beets, small grain, and foundations. Some areas of this soil are adjacent to or beans. Generally such characteristics as the high clay streams and are subject to occasional flooding. The poten- !-- content or the rapidly permeable substratum slightly tial is fair for such recreational development as camp and restrict some crops. picnic areas and playgrounds- Capability subclass Ile ir- All methods of irrigation are suitable, but furrow ir- rigated, IIIc nonirrigated; Clayey Plains range site. rigation is the most common. Proper irrigation water my-sandr0-te-1-pereefEslupes-'PMs-i management is essential. Barnyard manure and commer- deep, I drained soil on terraces at elevations 4,700 cial fertilizer are needed for top yields. to 4,900 fe It formed in alluvium alo ox Elder In nonirrigated areas most of the acreage is in small Creek. Included i apping are smal eas of soils that t_ grain and it is summer (allowed in alternate years. have a loamy subsoil a mall s of soils that are sub- Winter wheat is the principal crop. The predicted average ject to rare flooding. 1 yield is 33 bushels per acre. If the crop is winterkilled, Typically the surf ayer of Nunn soil is brown spring wheat can be seeded. Generally precipitation is too loamy sand ov rden about 9 inches 'ck. The subsoil low for beneficial use of fertilizer. is dark t ery dark grayish brown clay to about 21 Stubble mulch farming, striperopping, and minimum til- inch ick. The substratum to a depth of 60 in is Ilage are needed to control soil blowing and water erosion. fine-sand;-loarny-sander or sand.--------------- 'at 1 ' 52 SOIL SURVEY — the limited capacity of this coil to support a load,-Capa- Management of vegetation on this soil should be based bility dace I irrigated. on taking half and leaving half of the total annual produc- 82—Wiley-Colby complex, 1 to 3 percent slopes. This tion. Seeding is desirable if the range is in poor condition. nearly level map unit is on smooth plains in the western Sideoats grama, little bluestem, western wheatgrass, blue part of the survey area at elevations of 4,850 to 5,000 grama, pubescent wheatgrass, and crested wheatgrass are feet. The Wiley soil makes up about 60 percent of the suitable for seeding. The grass selected should meet the i unit, and the Colby soil about 30 percent. About 10 per- seasonal requirements of livestock. It can be seeded into i cent is Heldt silty clay and Weld loam. a clean, firm sorghum stubble or it can be drilled into a The Wiley soil is deep and well drained. It formed in firm prepared seedbed. Seeding early in spring has calcareous eolian deposits. Typically the surface layer is proven most successful. pale brown silt loam about 11 inches thick. The subsoil is Windbreaks and environmental plantings are generally d — pale brown silty clay loam about 23 inches thick. The sub- well suited to these soils. Cultivation to control competing y stratum to a depth of 60 inches is very pale brown silty vegetation should be continued for as many years as ii clay loam. possible following planting. Trees that are best suited and Permeability is moderately slow. Available water have good survival are Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern 1 capacity is high. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches redcedar, ponderosa pine, Siberian elm, Russian-olive, and or more. Surface runoff is medium, and the erosion hackberry. The shrubs best suited are skunkbush sumac, { hazard is moderate. lilac, Siberian peashrub, and American plum. t The Colby soil also is deep and well drained and formed Openland wildlife, such as pheasant, mourning dove, in calcareous eolian deposits. Typically the surface layer and cottontail are best suited to these soils. Wildlife I is pale brown loam about 7 inches thick. The underlying habitat development, including tree and shrub plantings material is very pale brown silt loam to a depth of 60 and grass plantings to serve as nesting areas, should be inches. successful without irrigation during most years. Under ir- Permeability is moderate. Available water capacity is rigation, good wildlife habitat can be established, benefit- high. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. ing many kinds of openland wildlife. Surface runoff is medium, and the erosion hazard is The Wiley soil has only fair potential for urban and moderate. recreational development. Slow permeability, moderate This map unit is used for irrigated and nonirrigated shrink-swell potential, and limited bearing capacity cause cropland and for rangeland, wildlife habitat, and urban problems in dwelling and road construction. The Colby _ development. soil has good potential for urban and recreational develop- In irrigated areas these soils are suited to all crops ment. Road design can be modified to compensate for the commonly grown in the area, including corn, sugar beets, limited capacity of this soil to support a load. Capability beans, alfalfa, small grain, and onions. An example of a subclass Ile irrigated, IVe nonirrigated; Loamy Plains — suitable cropping system is 3 to 4 years of alfalfa fol- range site. lowed by corn, corn for silage, sugar beets, small grain, or 83—Wiley-Colby complex, 3 to 5 percent slopes. This beans. Land leveling, ditch lining, and installing pipelines gently sloping map unit is on plains at elevations of 4,850 may be needed for proper water applications. to 5,000 feet. The Wiley soil makes up about 60 percent of _ All methods of irrigation are suitable, but furrow ir- the unit, and the Colby soil about 30 percent. About 10 rigation is the most common. Barnyard manure and corn- percent is Heldt silty clay and Weld loam. mercial fertilizer are needed for top yields. The Wiley soil is deep and well drained. It formed in —. In nonirrigated areas these soils are suited to winter calcareous eolian deposits. Typically the surface layer is wheat, barley, and sorghum. Most of the acreage is pale brown silt loam about 11 inches thick. The subsoil is planted to winter wheat. The predicted average yield is pale brown silty clay loam about 23 inches thick. The sub- 28 bushels per acre. The soil is summer fallowed in al- stratum to a depth of 60 inches is very pale brown silty ternate years to allow moisture accumulation. Generally clay loam. precipitation is too low for beneficial use of fertilizer. Permeability is moderately slow. Available water Stubble mulch farming, striperopping, and minimum til- capacity is high. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches — lage are needed to control soil blowing and water erosion. or more. Surface runoff is medium to rapid, and the ero-1 g Terracing aso may be needed to control water erosion. sion hazard is moderate. ' The potential native vegetation is dominated by blue The Colby soil also is deep and well drained and formed grama. Several mid grasses such as western wheatgrass in calcareous eolian deposits. Typically the surface layer — and needleandthread are also present. Potential produc- is pale brown loam about 7 inches thick. The underlying tion ranges from 1,600 pounds per acre in favorable years material is very pale brown silt loam to a depth of 60 to 1,000 pounds in unfavorable years. As range condition inches. deteriorates, the mid grasses decrease; blue grama, buf- Permeability is moderate. Available water capacity is — falograss, snakeweed, yucca and fringed sage increase; high. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. and forage production drops. Undesirable weeds and an- Surface runoff is medium to rapid, and the erosion hazard nuals invade the site as range condition becomes poorer. is moderate. i WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, SOUTHERN PART 53 This unit is used for irrigated and nonirrigated The Wiley soil has only fair potential for urban and cropland and for rangeland, wildlife habitat, and urban recreational development. Slow permeability, moderate development. shrink-swell potential, and limited bearing capacity cause — In irrigated areas these soils are suited to the crops problems in dwelling and road construction. The Colby commonly grown in the area. Perennial grasses and alfal- soil has good potential for urban and recreational develop- fa or close grown crops should be grown at least 50 per- ments. Road design can be modified to compensate for cent of the time. Contour ditches and corrugations can be the limited capacity of this soil to support a load. Capa- used in irrigating close grown crops and pasture. Fur- bility subclass. IIle irrigated, IVe nonirrigated; Loamy rows, contour furrows, and cross slope furrows are suita- Plains range site. ble for row crops. Sprinkler irrigation is also desirable. — Keeping tillage to a minimum and utilizing crop residue • _ . . .. . help to control erosion. Maintaining fertility is important. Crops respond to applications of phosphorus and nitrogen. ' he soil survey is a detailed inventory and evalua on In nonirrigated areas these soils are suited to winter of t•e most basic resource of the survey area—the s.. . It wheat, barley, and sorghum. Most of the acreage is is useful in adjusting land use, including urbanization, to planted to winter wheat. The predicted average yield is the li stations and potentials of natural resources . d the 28 bushels per acre. The soil is summer fallowed in al- environ. ent. Also, it can help avoid soil-related ailures _ ternate years to allow moisture accumulation. Generally in uses o the land. precipitation is too low for beneficial use of fertilizer. While . soil survey is in progress, soil scie• ists, con- Stubble mulch farming, striperopping, and minimum til- servationis.., engineers, and others keep ext.: sive notes lage are needed to control soil blowing and water erosion. about the n. ure of the soils and about uniq e aspects of _. Terracing also may be needed to control water erosion. behavior of t' • soils. These notes include d. . on erosion, The potential native vegetation is dominated by blue drought dama• • to specific crops, yield e.timates, flood- grama. Several mid grasses, such as western wheatgrass ing, the functio 'ng of septic tank dispo.al systems, and and needleandthread, are also present. Potential produc- other factors af •cting the productivi' , potential, and __ tion ranges from 1,600 pounds per acre in favorable years limitations of the .oils under various ses and manage- to 1,000 pounds in unfavorable years. As range condition ment. In this way, ' eld experience a . measured data on deteriorates, the mid grasses decrease; blue grama, buf- soil properties and ••rformance ar: used as a basis for — falograss, snakeweed, yucca, and fringed sage increase; predicting soil behavio . and forage production drops. Undesirable weeds and an- Information in this s• tion is u -ful in planning use and nuals invade the site as range condition becomes poorer. management of soils for rops, •: ture, and rangeland, as Management of vegetation on these soils should be sites for buildings, high ays •nd other transportation based on taking half and leaving half of the total annual systems, sanitary facilities, a•d parks and other recrea- production. Seeding is desirable if the range is in poor tion facilities, and for wil. o e habitat. From the data presented, the potential o ch soil for specified land condition. Sideoats grama, little bluestem, western wheat- — uses can be determined, s.I li stations to these land uses grass, blue grama, pubescent wheatgrass, and crested can be identified, and eo . ly fai res in houses and other wheatgrass are suitable for seeding. The grass selected structures, caused by u favorabl: soil properties, can be should meet the seasonal requirements of livestock. It can avoided. A site where .oil properti: are favorable can be be seeded into a clean, firm sorghum stubble, or it can be - drilled into a firm prepared seedbed. Seeding early in selected, or practices that will ove ome the soil limita- tions can be planned spring has proven most successful. Planners and of -rs using the soil s rvey can evaluate Windbreaks and environmental plantings of trees and the impact of spe. ic land uses on the .verall productivi- _ shrubs commonly grown in the area are generally well ty of the survey :rea or other broad plan ing area and on suited to these soils. Cultivation to control competing the environme . Productivity and the e vironment are vegetation should be continued for as many years as closely relate. to the nature of the soil. Plans should possible following plantings. Trees that are best suited maintain or c eate a land-use pattern in ha •ny with the and have good survival are Rocky Mountain juniper, east- natural soil. ern redcedar, ponderosa pine, Siberian elm, Russian-olive, Contrac ors can find information that is use .1 in locat- and hackberry. The shrubs best suited are skunkbush ing sours: of sand and gravel, roadfill, and tops.il. Other sumac, lilac, Siberian peashrub, and American plum. informa on indicates the presence of bedrock, we. ess, or — Openland wildlife, such as pheasant, mourning dove, very it soil horizons that cause difficulty in exca• .tion. and cottontail, are best suited to these soils. Wildlife He. officials, highway officials, engineers, and any habitat development, including tree and shrub plantings other specialists also can find useful information in this — and grass plantings to serve as nesting areas, should be soil survey. The safe disposal of wastes, for example, is successful without irrigation during most years. Under ir- cl..ely related to properties of the soil. Pavements, si. •- rigation, good wildlife habitat can be established, benefit- .1ks, campsites, playgrounds, lawns, and trees an. ing many kinds of openland wildlife. hrubs arc influenced by the nature of the coil. F, ,, ; 1. 100 SOIL SURVEY TABLE 6.--BUILDING SITE DEVELOPMENT [Some of the terms used in this table to describe restrictive soil features are defined in the Glossary. See text for definitions of "slight," "moderate," and "severe." Absence of an entry means soil was not rated] Soil name and Shallow Dwellings Dwellings Small Local roads map symbol excavations without with commercial 1 and streets basements basements buildings 1 , 2 Severe: Moderate: Moderate: ;Moderate: ;Moderate: — Altvan cutbanks cave. shrink-swell. shrink-swell. 1 shrink-swell. ; shrink-swell, ; frost action. 3*. Aquolls Severe: Severe: Severe: ;Severe: ;Severe: floods, floods, floods, ' floods, ; floods, wetness. wetness. wetness. ; wetness. I wetness, ; frost action. Aquents Severe: Severe: Severe: Severe: ;Severe: — floods, floods, floods, floods, 1 floods, wetness. wetness. wetness. ; wetness. ; wetness, frost action. 4*: Aquolls Severe: Severe: Severe: Severe: :Severe: floods, floods, floods, floods, ; floods, wetness, wetness. wetness. wetness. ; wetness, ; frost action. Aquepts Severe: Severe: Severe: Severe: ;Severe: floods, floods, floods, floods, ; floods, wetness. wetness. wetness. wetness. wetness, frost action. — 5 Slight Moderate: Moderate: Moderate: Moderate: Ascalon low strength. low strength. low strength. frost action, low strength. _ 6, 7 Slight Moderate: Moderate: Moderate: Moderate: Ascalon low strength. low strength. slope, frost action, low strength. . low strength. 8, 9 Slight Moderate: Moderate: Moderate: ;Moderate: Ascalon low strength. low strength. low strength. ; frost action, ; low strength. 10 Severe: Severe: Severe: Severe: ;Severe: Bankard cutbanks cave, floods. floods. floods. ; floods. floods. 11 , 12 Slight Slight Slight Slight ;Moderate: Bresser ; frost action. ( 13 Severe: Moderate: Moderate: Severe: ;Moderate: Cascajo cutbanks cave, slope. slope. slope. ; slope. small stones. 14, 15 Slight Slight Slight Slight Moderate: - Colby low strength. 16, 17 Slight Slight Slight Moderate: Moderate: Colby slope. low strength. — 18*: Colby Slight Slight Slight Moderate: Moderate: slope. low strength. Adena Slight ;Moderate: Moderate: Moderate: ,Moderate: _ ; low strength. , low strength. , low strength, I low strength. slope. See footnote at end of table. e ZO?�; ' Air - WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, SOUTHERN PART 101 - TABLE 6.--BUILDING SITE DEVELOPMENT--Continued Soil name and Shallow Dwellings Dwellings Small Local roads map symbol excavations without with commercial and streets — basements basements , buildings 19 Moderate: Severe: Severe: Severe: Severe: Colombo floods. floods. floods. floods. floods. 20 Slight Moderate: Moderate: Moderate: Moderate: Colombo low strength. low strength. low strength. low strength, frost action. — 21 , 22 Severe: Moderate: Slight Moderate: Severe: Dacono cutbanks cave. low strength, low strength, shrink-swell, shrink-swell. shrink-swell. low strength. 23, 24 Slight Moderate: Moderate: . Moderate: Moderate: _. Fort Collins low strength. low strength, low strength. low strength. shrink-swell. 25, 26 Severe: Severe: Severe: Severe: Severe: _ Haverson floods. floods. floods. floods. floods. 27, 28 Severe: Severe: Severe: Severe: Severe: Heldt too clayey. shrink-swell, shrink-swell, shrink-swell, shrink-swell, low strength. low strength. low strength. low strength. - 29, 30 Slight Moderate: Moderate: Moderate: Moderate: Julesburg low strength. low strength. low strength. low strength, frost action. 31 , 32 Slight Moderate: Moderate: Moderate: Moderate: Kim low strength. low strength. low strength. low strength. 33, 34 Slight Moderate: Moderate: Moderate: Moderate: Kim low strength. low strength. low strength, low strength. slope. 35•: Loup Severe: Severe: Severe: Severe: Severe: wetness, wetness, wetness, wetness, wetness. cutbanks cave. floods. floods. floods. Boel Severe: Severe: Severe: Severe: Severe: wetness, wetness, wetness, wetness, wetness, floods, floods. floods. floods. floods. _ cutbanks cave. 36•: Midway Severe: Severe: Severe: Severe: Severe: too clayey. shrink-swell, shrink-swell, slope, shrink-swell, low strength. low strength. shrink-swell, low strength. low strength. Shingle Severe: Severe: Severe: Severe: Severe: depth to rock. depth to rock. depth to rock. depth to rock, depth to rock. — slope. 37 Severe: Moderate: Severe: Moderate: Moderate: Nelson depth to rock. depth to rock, depth to rock. depth to rock, depth to rock, low strength. low strength. low strength. 38 Severe: Moderate: Severe: Moderate: Moderate: Nelson depth to rock. depth to rock, depth to rock. slope, depth to rock, low strength. depth to rock, low strength. low strength. 39, 40, 41, 42, 43 Moderate: Severe: Severe: Severe: Severe: Nunn too clayey. shrink-swell, shrink-swell, shrink-swell, shrink-swell, low strength. low strength. low strength. low strength. See footnote at end of table. 02.093 } 102 SOIL SURVEY TABLE 6.--BUILDING SITE DEVELOPMENT--Continued Dwellings Small Local roads Soil name and Shallow Dwellings with commercial and streets — map symbol excavations without basements basements buildings ;Slight Slight Slight; Moderate: yy Slight low strength. — Olney Slight Slight Slight ;Moderate: Moderate: 45 slope. low strength. Olney Slight Slight Slight Moderate: —V O, ey Slight low strength. Olney Slight Moderate: Moderate: 48 Slight Slight slope. low strength. _ Olney 49 Severe: Slight Slight Slight Slight. Osgood cutbanks cave. _, 50, 51 Slight Slight Slight Slight Slight. Otero Slight Slight Slight Moderate: Slight. 52, 53 g slope. Otero Severe: Severe: Severe: Moderate: - 5y Slight floods. floods. low strength, Paoli floods. frost action. Slight Slight Moderate: - 55 Slight g Slight g low strength, Paoli frost action. 56 Moderate: Moderate: - Renohill Moderate: Severe: Renohill depth to rock, low strength, low strength, low strength, low nk-swell, too clayey. shrink-swell. r - k, shrink-swell. shrink-swell. shinkswell - R Moderate: Moderate: Severe: 57 M depthtt: Moderate: low strength, Renohill depth to rock, low strength, dew httonroc, slope, too clayey. shrink-swell. deth o rock, low strength,r - . shrink-swell. shinkswell shrink-swell. 58, 59 Severe: Severe: Severe: Severe: Severe: - Sh ingle Shingle depth to rock. depth to rock. depth to rock. depth to rock. depth to rock. 60`: Severe: Shingle Severe: Severe: Severe: Severe: depth to rock. depth to rock. depth to rock. depth to rock. depth to rock. Moderate: Moderate: Severe: Renohill Moderate: Moderate: low strength, depth to rock, low strength, low strength, slope, too clayey. shrink-swell. depth to rock, low strength, shrink-swell. shrink-swell. shrink-swell. Moderate: Moderate: Severe: Moderate: 61 Moderate: depth to rock. Tassel depth to rock. depth to rock. depth to rock. slope. 62 Severe: Moderate: Severe: Moderate: Moderate: — Terry depth to rock. , depth to rock. depth to rock. depth to rock. depth to rock. 63 Severe: ;Moderate: Severe: Moderate: Moderate: Terry depth to rock. ; depth to rock. depth to rock. slope.epth to rock, depth to rock. 64 Moderate: ;Moderate: Moderate: ;Moderate: Moderate: Th edalund sodas untl depth to rock. ; low strength. depth to rock. low strength. low strength. , — Moderate: Moderate: Moderate: 65 Moderate: ;Moowrste: Thedalund depth to rock. low strength. depth to rock. strength, low strength. I slope. See footnote at end of table. WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, SOUTHERN PART 103 TABLE 6.--BUILDING SITE DEVELOPMENT--Continued Soil name and Shallow Dwellings Dwellings Small Local roads —. map symbol excavations without with commercial and streets basements basements buildings 66, 67 Moderate: Severe: Severe: Severe: Severe: _. Ulm too clayey. shrink-swell. shrink-swell. shrink-swell. ; low strength, shrink-swell. 68' Severe: Moderate: Moderate: Moderate: Moderate: Ustic small stones, slope. slope. slope. slope. Torriorthents cutbanks cave. 69 Severe: Slight Slight Slight Slight. Valent cutbanks cave. - 70 Severe: Slight Slight Moderate: Slight. Valent cutbanks cave. slope. 71*: Valent Severe: Slight Slight Moderate: Slight. __ cutbanks cave. slope. Loup Severe: Severe: Severe: Severe: Severe: wetness, wetness, wetness, wetness, ; wetness. cutbanks cave. floods. floods. floods. — 72 Slight Slight Slight Slight Moderate: Vona low strength. 73, 74 Slight Slight Slight Moderate: Moderate: Vona slope. low strength. 75, 76 Slight Slight Slight Slight Moderate: Vona low strength. - 77 Slight Slight Slight Moderate: Moderate: Vona slope. low strength. 78, 79 Slight Moderate: Moderate: Moderate: Moderate: _ Weld low strength, low strength, low strength, low strength, shrink-swell. shrink-swell. shrink-swell. shrink-swell, frost action. 80 Slight Moderate: Moderate: Moderate: Moderate: _. Weld low strength, low strength, low strength, low strength, shrink-swell. shrink-swell. slope, shrink-swell , shrink-swell. frost action. 81*, 82*: — Wiley Slight Moderate: Moderate: Moderate: Moderate: low strength, low strength, low strength, low strength, shrink-swell. shrink-swell. shrink-swell. shrink-swell. Colby Slight Slight Slight Slight Moderate: low strength. 83*: Wiley Slight Moderate: Moderate: Moderate: Moderate: low strength, , low strength, low strength, low strength, — shrink-swell. shrink-swell. slope, shrink-swell. shrink-swell. Colby Slight Slight ;Slight Moderate: Moderate: slope. low strength. * See map unit description for the composition and behavior of the map unit. '�"=„ - 108 SOIL SURVEY TABLE 8.--CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS (Some of the terms used in this table to describe restrictive soil features are defined in the Glossary. See text for definitions of "good," "fair," "poor," and "unsuited." Absence of an entry means soil was not _ rated] Soil name and Roadfill Sand Gravel Topsoil __ map symbol _ 1 , 2 Good Fair: Fair: Fair: Altvan excess fines. excess fines. thin layer. 3*: Good Fair: Poor: Aquolls Poor: excess fines. wetness. wetness, frost action. Poor: Good Fair: Poor: Aquents excess fines. wetness. wetness, frost action. 4*: Unsuited Poor: Aquolls Poor: Unsuited wetness. wetness, frost action. Unsuited Unsuited Poor: Aquepts Poor: wetness. wetness, frost action. 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 Fair: Poor: Unsuited Good. Ascalon low strength, excess fines. frost action, shrink—swell. Fair: Unsuited Poor: Bankard Fair: B ankard low strength. excess fines. too sandy. Fair: Poor: Unsuited Fair: 11 , small stones. Dresser frost action. excess fines. Good Good Good Poor: 13 small stones. Cascajo 14, 15, 76, 17 Fair: Unsuited Unsuited Good. Colby low strength. 18*: Unsuited Good. Colby Fair: Unsuited low strength. Adena Fair: Unsuited Unsuited Fair: wtoo clayey. low strength. Fair: Unsuited Unsuited Fair: Colombo, 20 Colombo low ttaction, too clayey. frost action. Good Good Good Fair: 21 , too clayey. Dacono 23, 24 Fair: Unsuited Unsuited Good. Fort Collins low strength. 25, 26 Fair: Unsuited Unsuited Good. Haverson low strength. Unsuited Unsuited Poor: 27, Pt Poor: Unsuited clayey. Held shrink-swell, low strength. See footnote at end of table. WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, SOUTHERN PART 109 TABLE 8.--CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS--Continued Soil name and Roadfill Sand Gravel Topsoil map symbol .....r._ —r--- _ 29, 30 Fair: Poor: Unsuited Good. Julesburg low strength, excess fines. frost action. 31 , 32, 33, 34 Fair: Unsuited Unsuited Good. _ Kim low strength. 35*: Loup Poor: Fair: Unsuited: Poor: wetness. excess fines. excess fines. wetness. . - Boel Fair: Fair: Unsuited Fair: wetness. excess fines. thin layer. 36*: - Midway Poor: Unsuited Unsuited Poor: shrink-swell, too clayey. low strength, thin layer. — Shingle Poor: Unsuited Unsuited Poor: thin layer. area reclaim. 37, 38 Poor: Unsuited Unsuited Good. Nelson thin layer. 39, 40 Poor: Unsuited Unsuited Fair: Nunn shrink-swell, thin layer. low strength. — 41, 42 Poor: Unsuited Unsuited Fair: Nunn shrink-swell, thin layer, low strength. too clayey. i 43 Poor: Unsuited Unsuited Poor: -- Nunn shrink-swell, ; too sandy. low strength. 44, 45 Fair: Poor: Unsuited Fair: Olney low strength. excess fines. ; too sandy, __ thin layer. 46, 47, 48 Fair: Poor: Unsuited Good. Olney low strength. excess fines. 49 Good Poor: Unsuited Poor: Osgood excess fines. too sandy. 50, 51, 52, 53 Good Poor: Unsuited Good. Otero excess fines. 54, 55 Fair: Unsuited Unsuited Good. Paoli low strength, frost action. 56, 57 Poor: Unsuited Unsuited Poor: Renohill low strength, thin layer. thin layer. _ 58, 59 Poor: Unsuited Unsuited Poor: Shingle thin layer. area reclaim. 60*: Shingle Poor: Unsuited Unsuited Poor: thin layer. area reclaim. See footnote at end of table. 920 7' '3 110 SOIL SURVEY TABLE 8.--CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS--Continued _ Soil name and Roadfill Sand Gravel Topsoil map symbol ZIGR: Renohill Poor: Unsuited Unsuited Poor: low strength, thin layer. thin layer. h1 Poor: Unsuited Unsuited Poor: Tassel thin layer, area reclaim. area reclaim. 62, 63 Poor: Unsuited: Unsuited: Fair: —Terry thin layer, thin layer. thin layer. small stones. area reclaim. o4, 65 Poor: Unsuited Unsuited Good. Thedalund thin layer. .6, 67 Poor: Unsuited Unsuited Fair: Ulm shrink-swell, too clayey. low strength. -is• Good Good Good Poor:l stones, Ustic Torriorthents too sandy. 69, 70 Good Fair Unsuited Poor: too sandy. -- Valent Ti': Valent Good Fair Unsuited Poor: too sandy. Loup Poor: Fair: Unsuited: Poor: wetness. excess fines. excess fines. wetness. 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77 Fair: Poor: Unsuited Good. Vona low strength. excess fines. Y8, 79, 80 Fair: Unsuited Unsuited Fair: Weld low strength, too clayey. shrink-swell, • frost action. 8 y2", 83*: Wiley Unsuited Unsuited Fair: Fair: too clayey. low strength, shrink-swell. Colby Fair: Unsuited Unsuited Good. low strength. • See map unit description for the composition and behavior of the map unit. 124 SOIL SURVEY TABLE 12.--ENGINEERING PROPERTIES AND CLASSIFICATIONS - (The symbol < means less than; > means greater than. Absence of an entry means data were not estimated] Classification Frag- Percentage passing — Soil name and ;Depth USDA texture 1 ments sieve number-- Liquid Plas- map symbol ; Unified PASHTO > 3 limit ticity inches 4 1 10 40 200 index In Pct i Pct —1, 2 0-10 Loam ;CL-ML A-4 0 90-100;85-100 60-95 50-75 20-30 5-10 Altvan 10-25 Clay loam, loam ;CL A-6, A-7 0 95-100;95-100 85-100 70-80 35-50 15-25 25-60 Sand and gravel ISP, SP-SM A-1 0 75-95 ;70-90 25-35 0-10 --- NP 3': — Aquolls 0-48 Variable ; --- --- --- --_ ; ___ ___ ___ ___ --- 48-60 Sand, gravelly ;SP, SP-SM A-1 0-10 60-90 50-70 30-50 0-10 --- NP sand. Aquents 0-48 Variable --- --- ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ — 48-60 Sand and gravel SP, SP-SM A-1 0-10 ;60-90 50-70 30-50 0-10 --- NP 4x: Aquolls 0-60 Variable --- --- ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ j ___ ___ — Aquepts 0-60 Variable --- --- ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ --- 5, 6, 7 0-8 Sandy loam SM A-2, A-4 0 ;95-100 90-100 70-95 25-50 15-25 NP-5 Ascalon 8-18 Sandy clay loam SC, CL A-6 0 ;95-100 90-100 80-100 40-55 120-40 10-20 18-60 Sandy loam, SC, A-4, A-6 0 195-100 95-100 75-95 35-65 1 20-40 5-15 sandy clay SM-SC, loam, fine CL, , sandy- loam. CL-ML 8, 9 0-8 Loam SM A-2, A-4 0 95-100 90-100 70-95 25-50 15-25 NP-5 Ascalon 8-18 Sandy clay loam SC, CL A-6 0 95-100 90-100 80-100 40-55 20-40 10-20 18-60 Sandy loam, SC, A-4, A-6 0 95-100 95-100 75-95 35-65 20-40 5-15 sandy clay SM-SC, loam, fine CL, sandy loam. CL-ML 10 0-4 Sandy loam SM A-2, A-4 0 95-100 90-100 60-70 30-40 --- NP Bankard 4-60 Fine sand, sand, SP-SM, SM A-2, 0-5 70-100 60-100 40-70 5-25 --- NP gravelly sand. A-3, __ A-1 11 , 12 0-16 Sandy loam SM A-1, A-2 0 95-100 75-100 35-50 20-35 15-25 NP-5 Dresser 16-25 Sandy clay loam SC A-2, 0 95-100 75-100 50-70 30-50 30-55 10-25 A-6, A-7 25-30 Sandy loam, SC, SM-SC A-2, A-1 0 90-100 60-100 30-60 20-30 25-35 5-15 coarse sandy loam, gravelly sandy loam. 30-60 Loamy coarse SP-SC A-2, A-1 0-5 80-100 35-85 20-50 5-10 20-30 5-10 sand, gravelly loamy sand, very gravelly loamy sand. 13 0-9 Gravelly sandy GM A-1 , A-2 0-15 50-65 50-60 15-40 10-35 --- NP Cascajo loam. 9-31 Very gravelly GP-GM, A-1 0-15 15-50 15-50 5-30 0-20 --- NP sandy loam, GP, GM very gravelly loamy sand, very gravelly sand. 31-60 Very gravelly GP, SP, A-1 0-15 10-60 10-60 5-30 0-10 --- NP -- loamy sand, GP-GM, very gravelly , SP-SM sand, gravelly sand. See footnote at end of table. Sn:2 WILD COUNTY, COLORADO, SOUTHERN PART 125 - TABLE 12.--ENGINEERING PROPERTIES AND CLASSIFICATIONS--Continued Classification Frag- Percentage passing Soil name and Depth USDA texture ments sieve number-- Liquid Plas- map symbol Unified AASHTO > 3 limit ticity — inches 4 10 40 200 index In Pct Pct ' 14, 15, 16, 17 0-7 Loam CL-ML A-4 0 100 100 90-100 85-100 25-30 5-10 Colby 7-60 Silt loam, loam, CL-ML A-4 0 100 100 90-100 85-100 25-30 5-10 — very fine sandy loam. 18*: Colby 0-7 Loam CL-ML A-4 0 100 100 90-100 85-100 25-30 5-10 — 7-60 Silt loam, loam, CL-ML A-4 0 100 100 90-100 85-100 25-30 5-10 very fine sandy loam. Adena 0-6 Loam ML A-4 0 100 100 90-100 70-90 20-30 NP-5 -- 6-9 Clay, clay loam, CH, CL A-6, A-7 0 100 100 95-100 80-90 35-60 15-35 silty clay loam. 9-60 Loam, silt loam, ML A-4 0 100 100 90-100 75-90 20-30 NP-5 very fine sandy loam. 1 19, 20 0-14 Clay loam CL-ML A-4 0 95-100 80-100175-90 50-70 25-30 5-10 Colombo 14-21 Clay loam, loam CL A-6 0 95-100 75-100175-90 50-70 20-30 10-15 21-60 Stratified clay CL, CL-ML A-4, A-6 0-5 90-100 75-100170-90 50-60 20-30 5-15 loam to sand. 21 , 22 0-12 Clay loam CL, A-6, A-4 0 85-100 75-100175-95 70-80 20-40 5-20 Dacono CL-ML 12-21 Clay loam, clay, CL A-6, A-7 0 75-100 60-100155-95 50-85 35-45 15-20 gravelly clay loam. 21-27 Sandy clay loam, CL, SC A-6 0 75-100 60-100150-95 40-85 25-40 10-20 loam, silt loam. 27-60 Very gravelly SP, GP A-1 0 35-80 5-50 1 5-40 0-5 --- NP sand. 23, 24 0-7 Loam CL-ML A-4 0 95-100 90-100 85-100 50-65 25-30 5-10 Fort Collins 7-11 Loam, clay loam CL A-6 0 95-100 90-100 85-95 60-75 25-40 15-25 11-60 Loam, fine sandy CL, CL-ML A-4, A-6 0 95-100 90-100 80-95 50-75 25-35 5-15 loam. 25, 26 0-4 Loam ML, CL-ML A-4 0 95-100 80-100 75-90 50-60 20-30 NP-10 Haverson 4-60 Stratified clay ML, CL-ML A-4 0 95-100 75-100 75-90 50-60 20-30 NP-10 loam to sand. 27, 28 0-60 Silty clay CH, CL A-7 0 95-100 95-10095-100 75-95 45-55 25-35 Heldt 29, 30 0-12 Sandy loam SM, ML A-2, A-4 0 95-100 75-100 45-85 25-55 --- NP Julesburg 12-27 Fine sandy loam, SM, ML A-2, A-4 0 95-100 75-100 50-85 30-55 15-25 NP-5 sandy loam. 27-60 Sandy loam, SM A-2, 0 95-100 75-100 40-85 15-50 --- NP loamy sand, A-4 , fine sand . A-1 31 , 32, 33, 34 0-12 Loam ML, SM A-4 0-5 90-100 75-100 60-90 45-75 20-35 NP-5 Kim 12-40 Loam, clay loam CL, CL-ML A-4, A-6 0-5 80-100 75-100 70-95 60-85 25-40 5-15 — 40-60 Fine sandy loam SM, ML A-4 0-5 80-100 75-100 70-95 40-55 20-30 NP-5 35*: Loup 0-16 Loamy sand SM A-2 0 100 100 50-100 15-30 NP 16-60 Loamy sand, sand SP-SM, SM A-2, A-3 0 , 100 100 65-100 5-20 NP - Boel 0-14 Loamy sand SM A-2 0 1100 100 85-95 20-35 --- NP 14-60 Fine sand , loamy SP, SM, A-2, A-3 0 1 100 100 85-95 0-25 --- NP fine sand , SP-SM coarse sand. - 36*: Midway 0-13 Clay CL, CH ,A-7 0 100 100 90-100 80-95 45-60 20-35 _ 13 Weathered ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ bedrock. See footnote at end of table. SP,O,,,„ ...9 126 SOIL SURVEY - TABLE 12.--ENGINEERING PROPERTIES AND CLASSIFICATIONS--Continued Classification Frag- Percentage passing Soil name and Depth USDA texture ments sieve number-- ;Liquid Plas- map Unified AASHTO > 3 I limit ticity _. symbol inches 4 10 40 200 index In Pct Pet 36*: Shingle 0-6 Loam CL-ML A-4 0-5 75-100 75-100 70-95 55-75 25-35 5-10 — 6-18 Clay loam, loam CL A-6 0 75-100 75-100 65-100 50-80 30-40 10-20 18 Unweathered --- --- --- --- --- --- --- bedrock. 37, 38 0-9 Fine sandy loam ML, SM A-4 0-5 75-100 75-100 70-90 45-60 --- NP —. Nelson 9-30 Fine sandy loam, SM, ML A-4, A-2 0 75-100 75-100 60-85 30-55 NP sandy loam.30 Weathered --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ___ bedrock. 39, 40 0-9 Loam CL, SC A-6 0-5 95-100 80-95 70-95 45-75 25-40 10-20 Nunn 9-29 Clay loam, clay CL, CH A-6, A-7 0-5 95-100 90-100 85-95 65-75 35-60 20-35 29-60 Clay loam, loam, CL, A-4, 0-5 80-100 80-100 60-90 25-75 15-40 5-20 sandy loam. CL-ML, A-6, SM-SC, A-2 SC 41, 42 0-9 Clay loam CL, SC A-6 0-5 95-100 80-95 70-95 45-75 25-40 10-20 Nunn 9-29 Clay loam, clay CH A-6, A-7 0-5 95-100 90-100 85-95 65-75 35-60 20-35 29-60 Clay loam, loam, CL, A-4, 0-5 80-100 80-100 60-90 25-75 15-40 5-20 sandy loam. CL-ML, A-6, SM-SC, A-2 SC 43 0-9 Loamy sand SM A-2 0-5 95-100 80-95 60-80 20-30 --- NP Nunn 9-30 Clay loam, clay CL, CH A-6, A-7 0-5 95-100 90-100 85-95 65-75 35-60 20-35 30-60 Clay loam, loam, CL, A-4, 0-5 80-100 80-100 60-90 25-75 15-40 5-20 sandy loam. CL-ML, A-6, . SM-SC, . A-2 SC 44, 45 0-10 Loamy sand SM A-2 0 95-100 90-100 60-90 15-25 --- NP Olney 10-20 Sandy clay loam SC, CL A-6 0 95-100 90-100 80-100 40-55 20-40 10-20 • 20-25 Sandy loam, SC, A-4, A-6 0 95-100 95-100 75-95 35-55 20-35 5-15 sandy clay SM-SC, loam, fine CL, sandy loam. CL-ML 25-60 Fine sandy loam, SM A-2 0 95-100 95-100 70-95 20-35 --- NP loamy fine sand. 46, 47, 48 0-10 Fine sandy loam SM A-2 0 95-100 90-100 70-95 20-35 15-25 NP-5 Olney 10-20 Sandy clay loam SC, CL A-6 0 95-100 90-100 80-100 40-55 20-40 10-20 20-25 Sandy loam, SC, A-4, A-6 0 95-100 95-100 75-95 35-55 20-35 5-15 sandy clay SM-SC, loam, fine CL, sandy loam. CL-ML 25-60 Fine sandy loam, SM A-2 0 95-100 95-100 70-95 20-35 --- NP loamy fine sand. 49 0-22 Sand SM A-2 0 100 100 65-80 15-30 --- NP Osgood 22-34 Sandy loam SM A-2, A-4 0 100 100 60-80 30-40 --- NP 34-60 Loamy sand, sand SM A-2 0 100 95-100 50-75 10-25 NP 50, 51 , 52, 53 0-12 Sandy loam SM A-2 0-1 95-100 75-100 50-80 20-35 --- NP Otero 12-60 Sandy loam, fine SM A-2, A-1 0-1 90-100 50-100 40-80 20-35 --- sandy loam, ' gravelly sandy loam. 54, 55 0-20 Loam ;ML A-4 0 95-100 90-100 75-95 55-75 25-35 NP-5 Paoli 20-25 Fine sandy loam, SM A-4 0 80-100 80-100 60-85 35-50 --- NP sandy loam. • — 25-60 Fine sandy loam„SM A-2, A-4 0 75-100 75-100 55-85 30-50 --- NP sandy loam. See footnote at end of table. r, — 128 SOIL SURVEY - TABLE 12.--ENGINEERING PROPERTIES AND CLASSIFICATIONS--Continued Classification ;Frag- Percentage passing Soil name and Depth USDA texture 1 Iments sieve number--- ;Liquid 1 Plas- ; Unified AASHTO > 3 limit ticity map symbol ;inches 4 10 40 200 index Pct T Pct In — ' 0 100 90-100160-90 15-30 --- NP 72, 73, 74 0-6 Loamy sand ;SM • A-2 _-- NP Vona 6-28 Fine sandy loam, ;SM A-2, A-4; 0 100 90-100 60-90 30-45 ; — sandy loam. 100 90-100 50-85 15-30 ; --- NP 28-60 Sandy loam, ISM A-2 0 loamy sand. 75, 76, 77 0-6 Sandy loam ISM A-2, A-4 0 100 90-100 60-90 30-45 -- NP NP -- Vona 6-28 Fine sandy loam, ;SM A-2, A-4 0 100 90-100 60-90 30-45 sandy loam. 0 100 90-100 50-85 15-30 ; --- NP 28-60 Sandy loam, ISM A-2 loamy sand. —78, 79, 80 0-8 Loam ;ML, A-4 0 100 95-100 85-100 60-85 20-30 NP-10 Weld 1 CL-ML 8-15 Silty clay loam, ;CL A-6, A-7 0 100 100 95-100 85-95 ; 35-50 15-30 silty clay. ; 15-60 Silt loam, loam ;CL-ML, CL A-4, A-6 0 100 95-100 85-100 60-85 ; 20-35 5-15 81*, 82*, 83': Wiley 0-11 Silt loam ;CL-ML, CL A-4, A-6 0 100 100 90-100 70-90 1 25-35 5-15 11-60 Silty clay loam,ICL A-6 0 100 100 90-100 70-95 25-35 10-20 silt loam. Colby 0-7 Loam ,CL-ML A-4 0 100 100 ;90-100;85-100; 25-30 5-10 7-60 Silt loam, loam 1CL-ML A-4 0 100 100 ;90-100;85'1001 25-30 5-10 * See map unit description for the composition and behavior of the map unit. • n-1 ti7A UTILITIES _COVi1. n j so`JI NAND Post Office Box 210, Niwot, CO 80544-0210 Li WAYER DISTRICT— (303) 652-2188, Metro(303) 443-2036 //9 December 4 , 1991 Mr. Vern Nelson Nelson Engineers 822 7th St. Greeley, CO 80631 Re: Richardson Estates Dear Mr. Nelson, The subject subdivision is within the service boundary of the Left Hand Water District. Z-7*Ie)?74::_ -t-te Sincerely, LEFT HAND WATER DISTRICT E. Wayne Wentworth, P.E. Ddistrict Engineer EWW/kp SFI °T RECEIVED r':C 0 9 1991 1i9 0 Public Service® Public vice of Colorado P.O.Box 551 Boulder,Colorado 80306 Dec. 3 , 1991 Nelson Engineers Attn: LaVern C. Nelson 822 7th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Dear LaVern: Per your letter and map of Nov. 26, 1991, this letter is to confirm that Public Service Company of Colorado will provide gas service to the Richardson Estate along Colorado Highway 119 . Service would be in accordance with the Rules and Regulations as on file with the Public Utilities Commission of Colorado. If you have any questions, please contact me on 938-2311. Sincerely yours, Larr it o P.E. Ene Services Engineer 2`-7' S cSt. U¢ain cSanitation 1.6isklu,c 514LKumtatI cSteeet RECEIVED G':c 0 5 1991 ��ozE (go3I 776-9570 J'on9mont, e(9 80501 1 119 December 4, 1991 Mr. LaVern C. Nelson, P.E. Nelson Engineers 822 7th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Re: Richardson Estate Dear Vern, Reference is made to your letter of November 26, 1991 regarding the Richardson Estate property. The property located between Weld County Roads 5 and 34 is within the District. The property West of Weld County Road 34 is not currently within the District, but it is in the District's Service Area. I have provided an Inclusion Packet to Mary Dyer, as he requested. The property in question can be served by this District. The portion East of Weld County Road 34 can best be served by the line extension constructed by the City of Longmont for its composting facility. The financial participation in this extension is as reflected in the attached letter to Ms. Millie Jensen dated July 25, 1990. The Baldridge property has participated in this cost. The portion West of Weld County Road 34 can be served in either of two ways. It can be served by extending the City installed extension along the North side _ of the property (South side of Highway 119) from Weld County Road 5 to the Weld County Road 3 alignment. It also can be served by a bore under Highway 119 from the District's last manhole located on the North side of Highway 119 and the West side of Weld County Road 34. While technically feasible, this latter does not make economic sense. The money that might be spent on the bore can better be utilized along the Highway 119 frontage to render Richardson Estate property developable. The Richardson Estate property will be responsible for its pro-rata share of the bore and line installed by the City, in accordance with the attached _ July 25, 1990 letter, and the construction of the east-west 8 inch trunk line along its frontage. Depending upon the nature of development, the Estate will also be responsible for 8 inch laterals to serve any sub-divided parcels not fronting upon Highway 119. All lines must be constructed from plans approved by the District and, upon completion, the line must be guaranteed for two years and dedicated to _ the District for future maintenance and operation. Lastly, there will be plant investment fees, pursuant to District Rules and Regulations, for each building/property served. eats� ' Cti ' v ft� :'ac.,. 9 Vern, I know that you know all these things, but I have set them forth in this letter to inform others who might be involved. Very truly yours, ST. VRAIN SANITATION DISTRICT ByA L.D. Lawson, P.E. Manager Copy to: Mr. Marvin Dyer Dyer Reality LDL:dp ..ECE1VEv IuJ WEsr COMMUNICATIONS 1855 So. Flatiron Ct. /� Boulder, Colorado 80301 December 2 , 1991 Nelson Engineers LaVern C. Nelson, P.E. 822 7th Street Greeley, Colorado. 80631 RE: Richardson Estates Dear Mr. Nelson; This is in regards to the proposed project known as Richardson Estates. U. S. WEST Communications will be able to provide telephone service for this project. I am your or the developers contact in regards to telephone service for this project. If I can be of further assistance please call me on 441-7161. Sincerely, Dennis Smith Manager Ems. RECF)VFn DEC 1 0 1991 pith J' MOUNTAIN VIEW FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT _ yy 700 Weaver Park Road, Longmont, CO 80501 (303) 772-0710 Metro(303) 666-4404 December 08, 1991 Nelson Engineers -- 822 7th Street Greeley, Co 80631 Re: Richardson Estate To Whom It May Concern: The Mountain View Fire Protection does provide fire protection to the Richardson Estate. However, it must be noted that any building or improvements to the site must meet all requirements of the Uniform Fire Code. This includes water for fire protection purposes. Sincerely, Mark A. Lawley Division Chief of Prevention ace 6299 Hello