HomeMy WebLinkAbout931118.tiff RESOLUTION
RE: APPROVE SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT (USR
#1027) FOR A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING ON A LOT UNDER THE MINIMUM LOT SIZE IN
THE A (AGRICULTURAL) ZONE DISTRICT - HOWARD AND JEANNINE ENOS
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado,
pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested
with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners held a public hearing on the
27th day of October, 1993, at the hour of 10:00 a.m. in the Chambers of the Board
for the purpose of hearing the application of Howard and Jeannine Enos, 3704
Richmond Drive, Fort Collins, Colorado 80526, for a Site Specific Development
Plan and Special Review Permit (USR #1027) for a single family dwelling on a lot
under the minimum lot size in the A (Agricultural) Zone District on the following
described real estate, to-wit:
Part of the SE* of Section 8, Township 7
North, Range 67 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld
County, Colorado
WHEREAS, at said hearing on October 27, 1993, the Board deemed it advisable
to continue said matter to November 3, 1993, at 10:00 a.m. , at the request of
R. Russell Anson, Attorney representing the applicant, and
WHEREAS, at said hearing on November 3, 1993, Mr. Anson was present to
represent the applicant, and
WHEREAS, Section 24.4.2 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance provides
standards for review of said Special Review Permit, and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners heard all of the testimony and
statements of those present, has studied the request of the applicant and the
recommendations of the Weld County Planning Commission and all of the exhibits
and evidence presented in this matter and, having been fully informed, finds that
this request shall be approved for the following reasons:
1. The submitted materials are in compliance with the application
requirements of Section 24. 7 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance.
2. It is the opinion of the Board of County Commissioners that the
applicant has shown compliance with Section 24.4.2 of the Weld
County Zoning Ordinance as follows:
a. That the proposal is consistent with the Weld County
Comprehensive Plan.
b. That the proposal is consistent with the intent of the
district in which the use is located.
c. That the uses which would be permitted will be compatible with
the existing surrounding land uses.
PL0904
931118
i ' ' / , , 71/ / 4T At/t 1
P Log O4 -
SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT - ENOS (USR #1027)
PAGE 2
d. That the uses which would be permitted will be compatible with
the future development of the surrounding area as permitted by
the existing zone and with future development as projected by
the Comprehensive Plan of the County or the adopted Master
Plans of affected municipalities.
e. That the applicant has demonstrated a diligent effort has been
made to conserve productive agricultural land in the
locational decision for the proposed use.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld
County, Colorado, that the application for a Site Specific Development Plan and
Special Review Permit (USR #1027) for a single family dwelling on a lot under the
minimum lot size in the A (Agricultural) Zone District on the hereinabove
described parcel of land be, and hereby is, granted subject to the following
conditions:
1. The attached Development Standards for the Special Review Permit
shall be adopted and placed on the Special Review plat prior to
recording the plat. The plat shall be delivered to the Department
of Planning Services and be ready for recording in the Weld County
Clerk and Recorder's Office within 15 days of approval by the Board
of County Commissioners.
2. The Special Review activity shall not occur nor shall any building
or electrical permits be issued on the property until the Special
Review plat is ready to be recorded in the office of the Weld County
Clerk and Recorder.
The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded,
adopted by the following vote on the 3rd day of November, A.D. , 1993.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
illeinetteh
ATTEST: WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
Weld County Clerk to the Board ( czyt 2 e.._� (.1 --
) /}�/� Constance L. H rbert, Chairman
BY: kC yyK-�4:C/) ly
Deputy aerk to the Board W. Webster, ro-Tem
/Ti(
APPROVED AS TO FORM: C, t c I
eorge . Baxt
ounty Attorney ` Dale K. Hall
/
aArba `tu.
ra J. Kirkme er d
931118
SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN
SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
HOWARD AND JEANNINE ENOS
USR #1027
1. The Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit is for a
single family dwelling on a lot under the minimum lot size in the
A (Agricultural) Zone District as submitted in the application materials
on file in the Department of Planning Services and subject to the
Development Standards stated herein.
2. Approval of this plan may create a vested property right pursuant to
Section 90 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance.
3. The property owner shall be responsible for all maintenance, including
grading and snow removal, of the private access road known as Weld County
Road 17, as required for ingress to and egress from the property to a
publicly-maintained road; however, if the County Engineer and County
Attorney determine that Weld County Road 17 is indeed a public
right-of-way for which Weld County has determined to accept maintenance
responsibility, then this Development Standard shall be deemed satisfied.
4. A Weld County Septic Permit is required for the proposed home septic
system and shall be installed according to the Weld County Individual
Sewage Disposal Regulations.
5. An Individual Sewage Disposal System must be located at least 100 feet
from any well.
6. An Individual Sewage Disposal System Permit must be finalized and approved
by an Environmental Protection Specialist within one (1) year of the
application date.
7. All construction on the property shall be in accordance with the
requirements of the Weld County Building Code Ordinance.
8. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the
Design Standards of Section 24.5 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance.
9. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the
Operation Standards of Section 24.6 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance.
10. Personnel from the Weld County Health Department and Weld County
Department of Planning Services shall be granted access onto the property
at any reasonable time in order to ensure the activities carried out on
the property comply with the Development Standards stated herein and all
applicable Weld County Regulations.
931118
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - ENOS (USA #1027)
PAGE 2
11. The Special Review area shall be limited to the plans shown herein and
governed by the foregoing Standards and all applicable Weld County
Regulations. Major changes from the plans or Development Standards as
shown or stated shall require the approval of an amendment of the Permit
by the Weld County Planning Commission and the Board of County
Commissioners before such changes from the plans or Development Standards
are permitted. Any other changes shall be filed in the office of the
Department of Planning Services.
12. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with all
of the foregoing Development Standards. Noncompliance with any of the
foregoing Development Standards may be reason for revocation of the Permit
by the Board of County Commissioners.
931118
HEARING CERTIFICATION
DOCKET NO. 93-77
RE: SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT (USR #1027)
FOR A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING ON A LOT UNDER THE MINIMUM LOT SIZE IN
THE A (AGRICULTURAL) ZONE DISTRICT - HOWARD AND JEANNINE ENOS
A public hearing was conducted on November 3, 1993, at 10:00 A.M. , with
the following present:
Commissioner Constance L. Harbert, Chairman
Commissioner W. H. Webster, Pro-Tem
Commissioner George E. Baxter
Commissioner Dale K. Hall
Commissioner Barbara J. Kirkmeyer
Also present:
Acting Clerk to the Board, Shelly Miller
County Attorney, Bruce Barker
Planning Department representative, Gloria Dunn
The following business was transacted:
I hereby certify that pursuant to a notice dated September 22, 1993, and
duly published October 14, 1993, in the Windsor Beacon, a public hearing
was conducted on October 27, 1993, to consider the request of Howard and
Jeannine Enos for a Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review
Permit (USR #1027) for a single family dwelling on a lot under the minimum
lot size in the A (Agricultural) Zone District. At said hearing on
October 27, 1993, said matter was continued to November 3, 1993, at which
time Bruce Barker, County Attorney, made this a matter of record. Mr.
Barker also made record of Docket #93-76, which too is an application from
Howard and Jeannine Enos for a Site Specific Development Plan and Special
Review Permit (USR #1026) for a single family dwelling on a lot under the
minimum lot size in the A (Agricultural) Zone District. He requested
separate motions on the two cases; however, the information received would
be relative to both. Gloria Dunn, Planning Department representative,
explained the Planning Commission's vote was split; therefore, there is no
recommendation. She then read the Planning staff's recommendation for
denial into the record. R. Russell Anson, Attorney, represented the
applicant and indicated the concept as being to divide 80 acres, on Weld
County Road 17, into two parcels. Each parcel would be greater than 35
acres, with one home on each. Mr. Anson explained the applicants
purchased this property in 1991 and presumed two homes would be permitted,
with the second home to be built for Margaret Graham. He said a recorded
exemption was denied in 1989, and Mr. and Mrs. Enos had a Substantial
Change hearing in June of 1992, which enabled them to submit this
application. Mr. Anson submitted photos of neighboring homes on Road 17,
Exhibit G, and a copy of the Urban Growth Boundary Map from the
Comprehensive Plan, Exhibit H, showing the Enos property just inside the
boundary. Mr. Anson said utilities are available from North Weld Water,
Public Service, Poudre Valley REA, residential trash, and Windsor Fire
Protection District. He said the gravel road is in good shape and there
is good drainage in the area. Mr. Anson addressed Planning's concerns
about the road and said there are two other new homes being constructed in
the area which he located on a map, Exhibit I. He submitted a Farm
Expenses and Income statement, Exhibit J, indicated farming is a losing
proposition and further explained the water is leased, therefore, very
limited. Mr. Anson submitted Declaration of Protective Covenants and
Building Restrictions, Exhibit K, concerning the property. He expanded on
the consistency with the Comprehensive Plan and the compatibility with the
surrounding area. Mr. Anson noted the Town of Ault had no objections and
submitted a referral, Exhibit L, indicating the Windsor Planning
Commission's unanimous approval. He said there have been no objections
931118
RE: HEARING CERTIFICATION - ENOS (USR #1027
PAGE 2
from surrounding property owners and submitted a petition, Exhibit M,
signed by neighboring property owners supporting the request and
reiterated the Planning Commission's actual motion was to recommend
approval. Mr. Anson further explained the reasons given by the Planning
Commission members who voted against the motion and confirmed the original
intention, in 1991, was to divide the property with Ms. Graham who
contributed to the purchase of the property. Arthur Clarke, surrounding
property owner, submitted a letter, Exhibit N, recommending approval of
the request and answered questions from the Board. In response to a
question from Commissioner Baxter, Mr. Enos said the property would be in
a pasture format rather than crops because of the limited deeded water
available. He further explained it would be a less intense agricultural
use with pasture, alfalfa, etc. , for a horse business. This use would
require less leased water, and he indicated he has no intention of it
becoming dryland. Mr. Enos answered further questions from the Board and
said there are two deeded shares of water, with one to go to each parcel
if split. Discussion ensued concerning accesses and Commissioner Baxter
said the Road and Bridge Department is ready to start work to drop the
hill on Road 17. He also said the County provides minimal maintenance on
the three-tenths of a mile. After further discussion, Ms. Dunn confirmed
Don Carroll, Engineering, indicated the three-tenths of a mile is a
private road. Mr. Anson said his client indicated the road was maintained
by the County. In response to a question from Commissioner Kirkmeyer, Ms.
Dunn said Planning's contention was that the property was not within
three miles of a municipality. Mr. Anson said the same confusion occurred
at the Planning Commission hearing, thus he prepared Exhibit H, as
previously referred to, from the Comprehensive Plan. He stated the
property is close to the border of the boundary; however, some of
Windsor's annexed property is north of the Town. Mr. Anson referenced
criteria in the Comprehensive Plan from 1987, which did not change when
updated in 1992, and reiterated the property is within the boundary and
there is activity and construction in the northern area. Mr. Barker
stated the map provides a general idea of the boundary and is not to be
considered exact. Mr. Anson stated the property is two and three-quarter
miles north of Windsor City limits. He further stated the grid was
measured and is correct. Responding to a question from Commissioner
Kirkmeyer, Ms. Dunn said the neighborhood to the north consists of
residential uses on large parcels and referred to the parcel I.D. map.
Mr. Enos said the properties adjacent to the north were divided by a
recorded exemption and both have irrigated pastures with horses. He
reiterated they have the same intent, which will be compatible, and are
not taking the land out of agriculture, only changing the intensity. Mr.
Enos indicated the northeast corner properties are residential, a sheep
farm, and new residences which are being constructed. Commissioner Baxter
stated he visited the area and explained the surrounding area from his
view point. He reiterated the Town of Windsor was not opposed and he
feels the proposal fits with what is currently going on in the area.
Commissioner Baxter reiterated he is convinced, after looking at the area,
that this type of use conforms appropriately. Ms. Dunn submitted to the
Board for review thirteen Development Standards, three Conditions of
Approval, and a referral from the Colorado Department of Transportation
requesting a right-of-way reservation. In response to a question from Mr.
Barker, Ms. Dunn indicated Development Standard #7 and Condition of
Approval #3 had been added to the Planning Commission's Resolution for USR
#1026. Mr. Anson, in reference to Development Standard #3, stated he
feels it should not be the applicants' responsibility to maintain Road 17.
He also indicated this is the first time he has seen Development Standard
#7 concerning the right-of-way reservation, and it would be difficult to
respond. There was considerable discussion concerning the impact on the
property of the right-of-way and set-back requirements. Chairman Harbert
suggested the motion be amended concerning Development Standard #3 which
requires maintenance of Road 17 by the applicants. Ms. Dunn stated she
has no documentation other than Don Carroll's referral from August 11
931118
RE: HEARING CERTIFICATION - ENOS (USR #1027
PAGE 3
indicating it is a private road. Commissioner Baxter reiterated the
County has been maintaining the road. Mr. Barker suggested leaving
Development Standard #3 as it is, with the County Engineer and Attorney to
determine the right-of-way and maintenance. Further discussion ensued
concerning maintenance of the road, and Mr. Anson noted the private road
was not mentioned in the covenants. Mr. Barker further explained the
amendment to Development Standard #3 by saying if the Engineer and
Attorney determine the road to be Weld County's right-of-way and therefore
maintained by the County, said Development Standard will be dropped. Mr.
Enos said that was acceptable, and it was determined Mr. Enos would be
required to arrange an agreement with the neighbors if the maintenance
would not be provided by the County. Commissioner Webster moved to
approve the request of Howard and Jeannine Enos for a Site Specific
Development Plan and Special Review Permit (USR #1027) for a single family
dwelling on a lot under the minimum lot size in the A (Agricultural) Zone
District, with the same Conditions of Approval and Development Standards
as recommended for USR #1026. Ms. Dunn recommended Development Standard
#7 and Condition of Approval #3 be deleted from the resolution for USR
#1027 because this parcel is not on Highway 14. Mr. Anson and the Board
concurred with Ms. Dunn's recommendation, and the motion carried
unanimously.
This Certification was approved on the 8th day of November, 1993.
APPROVED:
ATTEST: ee/ ✓!� MGG BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
C WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
Weld County Clerk to the Board /
By: L-t'je ( — 1/4./971-d4c-1 Constance L. arbert, Chairman
Deputy C1 rk to the Board i 2-24 j9
W. H� ebster, PPro-Tem IC/�I
TAPE #93-38
Baxte
DOCKET #93-77
Dale K. Hall /
PL0904 /2
(tia
Barbara J. Kirkm yer
931118
ATTENDANCE RECORD
HEARINGS ARE AS FOLLOWS ON THIS 3rd DAY OF November 1993:
DOCKET li 93-85 - Subdivision Preliminary Plan, Eugene and Pamela Habrock
DOCKET # 93-76 - Special Review Permit (USR #1026) - Howard and Jeannine Enos
DOCKET # 93-77 - Special Review Permit (USR #1027) - Howard and Jeannine Enos
DOCKET #
PLEASE write or print your name legibly, your address and the DOCKET It (as listed
above) or the name of the applicant of the hearing you are attending.
NAME ADDRESS HEARING ATTENDING
e)(va (d L . EA/3s `r 70 ki4`Lr}",..rud tic !{Si #s /o z6 /027
it
k_c vJ rr/ ' Ev L``_. t3 Cr �f. r rItv `u2 v ( ta `
7 la z p. Jr e i� . - 225 fc ciiir � � r , II
?37c/ 4)c „ S
ki4CLI
1 , (/�I✓�rr lAte,/OT labri S 13o3 ?/71 (h et93-03)
cl klw.4— YUzo . O+frk rc?z/ FA/ Cc; . cctc 3j
321'.19
NOTICE
The Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, on November 3, 1993,
conditionally approved a Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit
(USR 111027) for the property and purpose described below. Conditional approval
of this plan creates a vested property right pursuant to Article 68 of Title 24,
C.R.S. , as amended, for a period of three years.
APPLICANT: Howard and Jeannine Enos
3704 Richmond Drive
Fort Collins, Colorado 80526
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the SE* of Section 8, Township 7 North,
Range 67 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County,
Colorado
TYPE AND INTENSITY
OF APPROVED USE: A single family dwelling on a lot under the minimum lot
size in the A (Agricultural) Zone District
SIZE OF PARCEL: 42.54 acres, more or less
Failure to abide by the terms and conditions of approval will result in a
forfeiture of the vested property right.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
BY: DONALD D. WARDEN
CLERK TO THE
�� BOARD
BY: U/1 of / 7 JJJO
Deputy C rk to the Board
PUBLISHED: November 11, 1993, in the Windsor Beacon
31. 1s
Ab'r7DAVTT OF PUBLICATION
STATE OF COLORADO
ss
COUNTY OF WELD
I, KEITH HANSEN, of said County of Weld, being duly
sworn,say that I am publisher of
The Board of County
Countysoners of .on WINDSOR BEACON
Canary, Colorado.on
November 3, 1003,
eewdmnaly approved a a weekly newspaper having a general circulation in said
IMO Specific
County and State, published in the town of WINDSOR,
IlgogiaOwMopment Plan and
I v Review for die in said County and State; and that the notice, of which
Bag
the annexed is, a true copy, has been published in said
alorib and purp• ose weekly for / _successive weeks, that the notice
Content appeal* was published in the regular and entire issue of every
tine Nun wses • number of the paper during the period and time of
vested preyeaty Apt publication, and in the newspaper proper and not in a
Maarturlttr14 eloileet supplement, and that the first publication of said notice
T1M 24, CALS.. as was in said paper bearing the date of the Ws • day of 7)9—rC nJt4 , A.D., 19 and
APPLICANT: Howard the last publication bearing the date of the
al Jeannine E•aa,
$704 Richmond Dtiv,
Wet.Collins, Cola•d• day of , A.D., 19 and
ISO that the said WINDSOR BEACON has been published
LESAL DESCRIP110R continuously and uninterruptedly for the period of 5
Part or the SE 1/4 of consecutive weeks,in said County and State, prior to the
Seadon 8,Township 7 date of first publication of said notice, and the same is a
Nerve, Range 67 Vat newspaper within'the meaning of an Act to regulate
of la 6th Carty, olorado �
printing of legal notices an advertisements, approved
May 18, 1931, and all prior .cts 6far as in force.
TYPE AND INTENSITY
cc APPROVED USE:A
salt family dwelling an
a art under the minium
let size in the A ` P LISHER
(Agricultural) Zeno
DIeMN Subscri _d and worn to before me this /S day
• OF PARCEL: of P1 / 19 _
42.54 acres,more or
ear A s P (JC r r
FOS to abide ty the - NOTARY PUBLIC
to nta d.condiliels of
tapaeval will result in a
tat ks,of the wad My commission expires 7 J /9 96
ors right.
e 0ANO OF COUNTY
.COMMISSIONERS,
VALLS COUNTY,
COLORAIDO
S Y: OONALD D.
WARREN, CLERK TO
BOARD
By: Slblly K. Miller,
DopuW Clerk to the
Dowd
PuluShp4 IIft the
M
Meta•rss.II,MIL
5331.4154
Arthur M. Clarke + EXHIBIT
1401 Lindenwood Drive
Fort Collins , Colorado 80524 3�
( 303 ) 484 9899I406
$
3 November 1993
Subject: Special Review Permit for Howard and Jeannine Enos
TO: Weld County Board of Commissioners
My wife and I, as owners of the property immediately to the
west of subject property along Highway 14 , believe that
favorable consideration should be given to the request for
permission to build on a lot under the minimum lot size in the
Agricultural Zone in Weld County.
I have no quarrel with the Plannng and Zoning Board for their
refusal to issue a permit for these dwellings as they were
only following their instructions , probably given them by the
Board of Commissioners .
The property in question was once a marginally profitable
agricultural enterprise . However, once the water rights for
the property were removed from the land, the land became, in
effect, dry land so far as agriculture is concerned. Further,
when the farm was divided into smaller parcels, each parcel
was so small that dry land farming was not possible .
Since the land is on a slight westerly slope , it has a
magnificant view of the mountains beyond the foothills as well
as the lights of Fort Collins and Loveland. It is ideally
suited to being used for "Gentleman Farming" where the
resident has outside income , lives on the land and maintains a
few recreational animals.
So far as access to public utilities are concerned, North Weld
County Water, REA, Public Service Gas, and Mountain Bell
Telephone are immediately adjacent. Fire protection is by the
Windsor Fire Department. Public sewer is not available , but
the parcels are large enough to accommodate septic tanks and
leach fields without contaminating adjacent properties .
From a county financial standpoint, improved property will
furnish a much greater tax base than dry agricultural land.
I personally recommend approval of the request of Howard and
Jeannine Enos to receive permits to construct single family
dwellings on lots under the current minimum lot size in the
Agricultural Zone .
Since ely,
/ Clarke
9381'
it EXHIBIT ttERte%,To Weld County Commissioners October 27 , 19
RE:Division of Property by Special Review Permit
CASE NUMBER: USR-1026 & USR-1027
We support Howard and Bonnie Enos in their request to divide
the 80 acres on County Rd. 17 and Hwy 14, and feel that it
is consitent and compatible with the neighboring properties.
NAME ADDRESS
dCP/7 �airs
0
un ru, e e,z. 4f&bC? tAe' i/ _fit C�cc
GlJ ? lsso (,)c_ e 5 C
X707 `6 r4(i/ / y/ f4 r Go//- �s
/ • /
ILL./t12+-` ti„,e f. ( time) }' i (?) vca 7 ck_Criu-c.t,.-si
. . LAMA UJe).() e '1 , �� �+ CA)Otkir5 c�
ate:'I,Gw t C Uk yYW �C (t 4E. /it0/tce2At <rc-o-tf Sy y ('1 � , @C)
921117
EXHIBIT
t vsR k• DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING
41(7. 1
PHONE (303) 353-3845, EXT. 3540
WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
1400 N. 17TH AVENUE
CGREELEY, COLORADO 80631
•
COLORADO
Date: September 2, 1993
CASE NUMBER: USR-1026
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
Enclosed is an application from Howard and Jeannine Enos for a Site Specific
Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a single family dwelling on a
lot under the minimum lot size in the A (Agricultural) zone district. The ;excel
of land is described as part of the SE4 of Section 8 , T7N, R67W of the 6th P.M. ,
Weld County, Colorado. The location of the pacelles north of twe of land for which
this
application has been submitted is approximately 3
mf
Windsor; north of State Highway 14 and west of Weld County Road 17 .
This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments
or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated.
Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the. processing of the application and
will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by
September 6, 1993, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation.
Please call Gloria Dunn, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the
application.
Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above.
1. We have reviewed this request and find that it
does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the
following reasons.
2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request
(is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town
for the following reasons:
3, ✓ We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our
interests.
4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be
submitted to you prior to:
5. Please refer to the enclosed letter. •
Signed
Agency: T�r
E C I V E
Date:
SEP 7 1993
93111.
Weld Nulty Planning
_. �• `-r -- , � ,lu l JJ , -t-Jut ,U ,IAL AAU 3 t I LULL I,A3 J-, 1"r,J00/22,m 2/ 5
;" I i EXHIBIT ',
K
• Ira,
�4`7°Dii 05/17/89 ].0: 43 $9 .00 1/0O3 .
ARr1798S0 .. - F,RSTEIN CI,-- & RECORDYR WELD CO, CO
DECLARATION OF PROTECTIVE COVENANTS
AND BUILDING RESTRICTIONS
THE eenERSIGNED, JOHN A. MAY, being the owner of the real
ratee . ry -situate in the county of Weld, State of Colorado, to
wit :
As described on Exhibit A, attached hereto and
incorporated herein by reference.
eeez hereby establish the following protective covenants and
euelding restrictions for the benefit and protection of said
:and . at; for use of every person who may hereafter acquire
owneveh ip therein as follows:
4114 :.;: Commercial feed lots or hog farms shall be permitted.
• Any residence constructed shall have a minimum floor
area for living space of 1200 eq. ft. or more in the first
floor, exclusive of garages and patios. This provision shall
not epply for servants quarters or guest houses built and
used in conjunction with the principal residence. No
residence shall be Constructed or maintained on an area of
; es s than twc. end one-half acres.
•. . All bu _ _age and improvements erected or placed on said
property sh..; l 'be of new construction with first class
workmanship and quality material used in all phases of
•struction.
No mobile home, basement, tent, or shack at any time
.: ii be used at a residence temporarily or permanently, no:
e. ; any structure of a temporary character be used- as a - -
. .,es .dence. Modular homes, consistent with paragraph #2
above, placed upon a permanent foundation and landscaped in
harmony with the surroundings are permitted.
9 No noxiee: :r offensive activity shall be carried on
upon any propce. ty, nor may anything be done which may be or
may become an annoyance to the neighborhood. No land shall
be used for dumping ground for ' :ash, rubbish or other waste .
All property and premises shall be kept in a clean and
- sanitary condition at all times.
6 . There shall be no unenclosed storage of inoperable
vehicles. There shall be no storage of farm machinery,
recreational vehicles, boats, and other pleasure craft other
than those items belonging to the owner of said tract of land
upon which items are placed for storage or safe keeping.
7. No e '.. ucture shall be built nearer than 50 feet from any
property line.
All owners shall cut and control all weeds growing on
heir own property, whether vacant, occupied, or those with
h
improvements under construction. Nothing in this paragraph
shall prohebi % part or all of the premises from being used
the production, of agricultural commodities whether for bale
or use by owner. Normally accepted agricultural practices
shall be followed in all farming operations.
9. These covenants are to run with the land and shall be
binding on all parties and all persons claiming under them
until April 1 , 1995, at which time :, ;id covenants shall be
automatically extended for successiee periods of ten years,
unless by vote of 75% or more of the then owners of the land
it is agreed to change said covenants in whole or in part.
JCIV tSr vpen et I10Ura! ;1U-21-J3 ; 4;51YM ;KINKO'S FT COLLINS 3- 13535722;# 3/ 3
is 12-Fa REC 02119550 05/1'! ut' 10 : 43 $9 . 00 2/003
•
P 1 (091 ttLL'RY ANN FSUI RSTEIK CLERK & Re;cOR.DER WELD CO, CO
,,artier hereto, or any cf them, or their heirs or
.. 1 violate or attempt to violate any of the
; n . 1t shall be lawful for any other person or
t < al property, situated on these lands to
,cu,,!dings at law ar in equity against the
.r pc s vl.olating any such covenant , and either to
_how from so doing or to recover damages or
.th violations, plus their reasonable
r^�
2;; h day of A�ri1 ,i98 ( --,
tr
4JA. May
709 Whistlepig Lane
Broomfield, Co 80020
GTATE OF CULOKAiiQ )
)
COUNTY OF I.A1U 'k !
4t,; r,t - ng instrument was acknowledged before me this
c„;_vy- say of , 1989, by ,john A. t$ay., 1709 Whi-sl.lepi ,'•
ne, Broomf ierd, CO 80020.
'.;ITN rS F. Y hand and officinal seal ,
No .ary Pu is i 1 KEWE %
r� Iy. "i .$ i
My Cammissior Expires : My address Is: I1 `Fri_ S•April 7� 19 3.. _� 5404 Janne Drive. •
Loveland, Colorado 50538
•
931.1.1.1
� I
•
4. B 1232 REC 02179850 05/17/89 10:43 $9.00 3/003
F 1692 MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK i RECORDER WELD CO, CO
Exhibit "A" y;
LEGAL DESCRIPTION -
t„tw
This legal description refers to an approximate 2283
Acre Parcel located in weld County, Colorado.
i.
The SE 1/4 of Section 8, Township 7 North, Range 67 Nest of the
6th P.M.,
ALSO a tract of land located in the SW 1/4 of Section 8, Town-
ship 7 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P.N. , being more parti-
cularly described as follows:
COMMENCING at the South Quarter Corner of said Section 8, and
considering the East line of the SW 1/4 of said Section 8 to
bear N00'06 .51•E and with all other bearings contained herein
relative thereto;
thence N00'06'51"E 94.97 feet to a point on the centerline of
the Water Supply and Storage Ditch across said SW 1/4, said point
being the TRUE POINT OP BEGINNING;
thence along the Centerline of said Water Supply and Storage
Ditch by the following ten courses and distances:
N62'50'45"W 295.47 feet; N51.22'19"W 172.62 feet; N30'52"07"W.
622.64 feet; N22'SS'51'W 533.55 feet; N48'42'21"W 295.86 feet;
N77'41'36"W 443.21 feet; N48'26'34"W 273.23 feet; N17'54'27"W
705.26 feet; M57'12'02'W 235.24 feet; N71'42' 17'W 17.75 feet
to a point on the North line of the SW 1/4 of said Section 8,
thence N89'48'45'8 along the North line 2,221.41 feet to the
Center Quarter Corner of said Section 8,
thence S00'06'S1'W along the East line of the SW 1/4 of said
Section 8, 2,552.06 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM a parcel of land conveyed to the Water
Supply & Storage Company, by deed recorded March 3, 1908 in
Book 250 at Page 347, being more particularly described as
follows:
COMMENCING at a point on the North boundary of said 1/4 section,
thence by true bearings, variation 14'30'E - 868.30.E 34 feet,
$66'30'E 100 feet; $56'35'E 100 feet; S38'10'E 100 feet;
S25'30'E 100 feet; S15.314.8 400 feet; 819' 10'E 100 feet;
S37'S 100 feet; S42'E 100 feet; S50'30'E 100 feet;
S75'34'E 392 feet; S57'25'E 200 feet; 850'SS'E 100 feet;
S35' 10'E 100 feet; 824'E 200 feet; 822'22'E 300 feet;
829'36'E 500 feet; 833.04.E 100 feet; 844.10.E 100 feet;
554'30'E 100 feet; 964'E 200 feet; S58'E 100 feet;
545'45'E 50 feet to a point 76 feet North of the South
Quarter Section Corner of said Section 8, being a strip
of land 100 feet wide SO feet on each side of the above
described center line and 3676 feet long.
921?1'"
EXHIBIT
FARM EXPENSES & I. ,OME
DATE CATEGORY EXPENSE COST OF INCO
SPLIT
1991
5/1 Prof. Fee 355
5/1 Farm Lease 862
Credit
5/1 Closing Cost 279
8/1 Mortg.Int. 2876.72
11/1 Mortg.Int. 2872.37 -
1991 Travel Exp. 51
1991 Phone 28
I le
Total Exp. - '6#62.09 Total Inc. 862
1992
2/1 Mort.Int 2867 .92
3/16 Cactur Hill 2038. 99
3/16 Lease Paymt 2502
4/28 Tax 755
5/1 Mort.Int. 2863 . 37
5/6 Irrig.Water 2025
8/1 Mort.Int. 2858 .71
11/1 Mort.Int. 2853 . 93
11/19 Farm Lease 3108
12/30 No.Poudre Irr. 150
1992 Travel 23.50
1992 Phone 6
Total Exp. 1992 313583.71 Income:5J610.00
Ili
1993
1/29 Lawyer 313 .50
2/1 Mort.Int 2849.05
3/25 Irr.No.Poudre 150
3/22 Farm Lease 2220
4/12 .. Lawyer 114
4/12 Irr.Water 1650
4/27 Taxes 717
5/1 Mort.Int. 2844. 04
5/4 Lawyer 258 .50
6/1 Lawyer 142.50
6/25 Intermill Maps 427
7/22 Application 1600
8/1 Mort.Int 2838 .92
8/2 Lawyer 434.04
9/2 Lawyer 85. 50 i
10/14 Lawyer 1012
1993 Phone 35
1993 Travel 196 r'$
1993 Travel 20
f. rk
Fax 12 ''S", a.
Total 1993 5 11)069. 00 4630 .04 Inc. 21220.ea
•
it
91.: 17, rz j
ar
EXHIBIT
skftsk
loa
9 - D°I v Lies $r9��ti
I
Farm
El 0 vpiea
lisw ri
rhi �.
Ntw Wad
Nogg
ARPL1 I
, Li' eht_ A tacri Or1a
NORM L OLt) Ci\- MP
( I BA AN
CP
3it ete A Nto C?
NOME
Sams
I I
It) 1 lf- A i
so rnV
..............._ as. re:
CORt3
3 75 1 A c4
ti)
nicahrieolla
/Metes
HWY iq
Otdoirti? microw ewe
El r•-•
STOW
in TOWS 0
et 04 o
Arm 400dig Y 0 Farm h ow l
1
WELD COUNTY I IEXHIBIT .
URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY I
MAP ( Y ;';'
NUNN
.� �,....Tn a ,w I I I I (,.
_ 0 6 ' :
�4MM�MI Y1vK[] �ti\_ ♦ ,
' lr v] I I I -I
1 �. � ® W I I I I I 7,
^ I
UIBUI GROWTH BOUNDA.A 6 I 4 l I •
_ _ PIERCE I '"
/ , /
fr1 �D I I I AULT
' N
I I I II '
d EATON
•'`°• cal 1 1 1 SEVERANCE I 1 . 1 I I
w WINDSOR I I I I I I I I I 1 ' I it
I '"-x II II II II I
III I III '' \ I I I I I is
II I I
-.- • �` ,?��� KERSEY
id r 'tii I I•n �s v r�r.
^. MILLIKEN ll I I L. V LA STALL -11
�/
I I
IIIIIIIIrt.11 =° I III IIII
J0HNS TOW I I I I I
56 i
pasiiill1-25 L..',. I
'• ILCREST
•
,.. 41 l I
i .
I
11111
IJWII! PLATLFERLLEH
IiIilIIIII,L
I
II �
6
L 5 1111 oz, ARESTONE I I It TNIESBURG
o al I I I I I I AItior a_L a
1 ti :, FREIDERICK � 7.. LUPTON g
, a 1 DACONO a - HUDSON
/I
j.: I •
i is
II
BRIGHTON "���� yl��]ww�
32 931117
ii
S{ i a ,.IO .b `f to _'f I{ _ I .0.
Z }l ^^+++++11YLY
v l
e .
/1
f I t~ 1 _ ,,--es.,,, r i 3 '+ '
ck`� r 'd � � . 1:21
/ { ! 1 I.', d,i°7° { �-J
S} l Y
�� 'I C E�d'/f 5` +:'I' —.l
{ ! ri
set _ {[,7 / r...
JJ
1y
k rgiJ'
7
'
4 i
-.; ;;14,,
/
F .,,r,..4,. ..,,,,‘. .
I7 ,� a St�l_ '&5 � r
K Iv
4
vo
i � ' 1g' iiyJ -
P
�amid t ',",'' .;:•`.. ah:.
;St.:, ,
a
?•
ri 3 d:
1 11 ;-1
2 as r a
i 4 ji
I' i 7 • [ frxr
I �H � l3dr LY�b..,
a 7,74,511.4.-4 ^�;E.
R. RUSSELL ANSON
ATTORNEY AT LAW WELD ^',", i 820 13TH STREET
GREELEY,COLORADO 80631
(303)353-5508
I793 SLP 7, j
September 16, 1993
, V TELECOPIEF:130313535]22
TO -Fir
Office of Board of
County Commissioners
P.O. Box 758
Greeley, Colorado 8O632
Attn: Constance L. Harbert, Chairman
Re: Applications of Howard and Jeannine Enos for Site
Specific Development Plans and Special Review Permits
Dear Madam Chairman:
This letter is in response to your letter of September 14 , 1993
indicating that the Planning Commission had recommended unfavorably
USR-1026 and USR-1027 . To put the record straight, a motion was
made by a Planning Commission member to recommend to the Board of
County Commissioners approval of both the USRs, however, the motion
failed to pass because the vote was three (3) commissioners in
favor and three (3) commissioners against. No other motion was
made. Therefore, it appears that there really isn't any
recommendation being presented to the Board of County Commissioners
by the Planning Commission.
In fact, Section 24.3 . 1 of the Zoning Ordinance for Weld County at
page 20-23 states specifically "the Planning Commission shall
approve the request for' the Special Review Permit unless it finds
that the applicant has not met one or 5 and more
of {emphasis added}
the
standards or
24conditions of Sections 24. 3 . 1,
Since the Planning Commission did not make these specific fndings,
it would be my opinion that the effect is actually approval
ppi
they did not disapprove by finding that the applicant has not met
the standards or conditions above-cited.
In any event, we are asking for a hearing before the Board of
County Comm' o s
Very tr r
u 1 An n
ttor y At Law
RRA:kb
C: Howard and Jeannine Enos
t1
4416
OFFICE OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
PHONE(303)356-4000, EXT. 4200
1 FAX(303)352-0242
P.O. BOX 758
IIIC. GREELEY,COLORADO 80632
COLORADO
September 14, 1993
Howard and Jeannine Enos
3704 Richmond Drive
Fort Collins, Colorado 80526
Dear Mr. and Ms. Enos:
Your application for a Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit
for a single family dwelling on a lot under the minimum lot size in the A
(Agricultural) Zone District (USR-1027) has been recommended unfavorably to the
Board of County Commissioners by the Planning Commission. The legal description
of the involved is shown as Section 8, Township 7 North, Range 67 West
property
of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado.
If you wish to be heard by the Board of County Commissioners, it will be
necessary for you to indicate your request by signing the bottom of this letter
and returning it to this office. Regular hearing procedures will then be
followed. This includes publishing a Notice of Hearing in the legal newspaper,
an expense to be paid by you.
In order to proceed as quickly as possible, we must receive your reply by October
15, 1993. If we are not in receipt of your request by that date, the matter will
be considered closed.
Sincerely,
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
/-
Constance L. Harbert, Chairman
CH: ld
I/we, , do hereby request the Board of
County Commissioners to review the above mentioned application.
n 4.19
�x hjh;f 1/42)
SUMMARY OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
September 7 , 1993
Page 6
Howard Enos , applicant, said this application will enhance the lifestyle in the
area. There are 40 acre parcels in existence to the north. They are on the
outer fringe of the Town of Windsor and could act as a buffer from the larger
more agricultural areas . He gave an overview of the difficulties of making a
farm this size pay. Road maintenance was discussed. Jeannine Enos explained the
other residences in the area in relationship to the road.
Tom Rulon moved Case Number USR-1026 be forwarded to the Board of County
Commissioners with the Planning Commission' s recommendation for approval due to
the present hardship on the property owners, the location, and the proximity to
the Town of Windsor. Juliette Kroekel seconded the motion.
The Chairperson asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning
Commission for their decision. Richard Kimmel-no; Ron Somer-yes; Tom Rulon-yes;
Juliette Kroekel-yes; Marie Koolstra-no; Judy Yamaguchi-no. Motion denied, tie
vote.
CASE NUMBER: USR-1027
APPLICANT: Howard and Jeannine Enos
REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a
single family dwelling on a lot under the minimum lot size in the A
(Agricultural) zone district.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the SE4 of Section 8 , T7N, R67W of the 6th P.M. ,
Weld County, Colorado.
LOCATION: Approximately 3 miles north of the Town of Windsor; north of State
Highway 14 and west of Weld County Road 17.
Tom Rulon moved Case Number USR-1026 be forwarded to the Board of County
Commissioners with the Planning Commission' s recommendation for approval due to
the present hardship on the property owners , the location, and the proximity to
the Town of Windsor. Juliette Kroekel seconded the motion.
The Chairperson asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning
Commission for their decision. Richard Kimmel-no; Ron Somer-yes; Tom Rulon-yes;
Juliette Kroekel-yes; Marie Koolstra-no; Judy Yamaguchi-no. Motion denied, tie
vote.
CASE NUMBER: Amended USR-972
APPLICANT: Laidlaw Waste Systems (Colorado) , Inc.
REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and an Amended Special Review
permit for a soil storage area for an existing solid waste disposal
site facility in the A (Agricultural) zone district.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of Section 29 , T1N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld
County, Colorado.
LOCATION: Adjacent to the Town of Erie; approximately 1/4 mile west of the
intersection of Weld County Road 5 and 6.
221.119
BEFORE THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS „')
Moved by Tom Rulon that the following resolution be introduced for passageby the
Weld County Planning Commission. Be it resolved by the Weld County Planning
Commission that the application for:
CASE NUMBER: USR-1027
NAME: Howard and Jeannine Enos
ADDRESS: 3704 Richmond Drive, Fort Collins, CO 80526
REQUEST: Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a
single family dwelling on a lot under the minimum lot size in the A
(Agricultural) zone district.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the SE4 of Section 8, T7N, R67W of the 6th P.M. ,
Weld County, Colorado.
LOCATION: Approximately 3 miles north of Windsor, north of State Highway 14 and
west of Weld County Road 17.
be recommended favorably due to the present hardship on the property owners, the
location, and the proximity to the Town of Windsor.
VOTE:
For Passage Against Passage
Ron Somer Richard Kimmel
Tom Rulon Marie Koolstra
Juliette Kroekel Judy Yamaguchi
The Chairperson declared the resolution denied (vote was 3 to 3) and ordered that
a certified copy be forwarded with the file of this case to the Board of County
Commissioners for further proceedings.
CERTIFICATION OF COPY
I, Sharyn Ruff, Recording Secretary of the Weld County Planning Commission, do
hereby certify that the above and foregoing resolution is a true copy of the
resolution of the Planning Commission of Weld County, Colorado, adopted on
September 7, 1993.
Dated the 7th o Septemb , 1993.
Sharyn F. uff
Secretary
S214_19
INVENTORY OF ITEMS SUBMITTED FOR CONSIDERATION
Applicant: Howard and Jeannine Enos Case Number: USR-1027
Submitted or Prepared
Prior
to Hearing At Hearing
1. Application 18 pages X
2. 1 Application plat X
3. DPS referral summary sheet and letter X
4. DPS letter to applicant X
5. DPS Recommendation X
6. DPS Surrounding Property Owner/Mineral Owner
Mailing list, letter and certificate. X
7. 3 DPS Maps Prepared by Planning Technician X
8. DPS Notice of Hearing X
9. DPS Case File Summary Sheet X
10. DPS Field Check X
11. RE-1210 Board of County Commissioners
Resolution, dated October 18, 1989 X
12. SCH-5 Recommendation, dated June 24, 1992 X
13. August 23, 1993 field check from Richard Kimmel X
14. August 11, 1993 referral from Weld County
Engineering Department X
15. August 17, 1993 referral from Weld County
Health Department X
16. September 2, 1993 referral from Windsor X
17. Weld County Urban Growth Boundary Map X
I hereby certify that the 17 items identified herein were submitted to the
Department of Planning Services at or prior to the scheduled Planning
Commission hearing. I further certify that these items were forwarded to
the Clerk to the Board's office on September 10, 1993.
Curreit P anner
STATE OF COLORADO )
)
COUNTY OF WELD )
SUSCRI,I,ED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS day of d 1993.
‘G: o
�...P U E \'- ,:4r NOTAR PUBLIC
` L
1K, 6put&sion Expirest\ Q (_,_l ' 19(415 •
,5,c/l/htt A
EXHIBIT INVENTORY- CONTROL SHEET
Case //Sie /4Z7 /ileigta 4- (Z lnnine. E/7Ai
Exhibit Submitted By Exhibit Description
, A. /
P1/7/9/rr� .�ta�� 7yen67ycofZtems
94 3 B B. /"/4/A/?i//!?� i/rl/55/07/ SZ1/7*v,t//(27t/n/. h/1dabr2
/7:3 c. /9/dim/ng Lainpq/55/o9 Stein/7wyef,4cannGJ
E'er sc-r4Cacthar//;i;la aas
`�7o E. 41-SCE-11 A176671 le ear `Jr6e-ccd
SP. G'brK .eoCLrel A4T-71.7 -
cif, G. Att(iGGtiivk PI wigs I etri
fl / fk R 1
H. rah (�b(N' o�.Y.V1,U�'(a P
t' 1"`� of —c�,
I.
K. ( OWEac vc
v
h
c � .
L. c �.�ro TownI (� incisor
C) 61, t/ _1 af SIke rrf
N. Tl ur 41GCk, l.- G' tthc
?Iasmn'tlk Dt. Acs'«( Mae
P.
Q.
R.
S.
T.
U.
V.
W.
X.
Y.
Z.
931.'.1`9
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Howard and Jeannine Enos
USA-1027
1. The attached Development Standards for the Special Review permit shall be
adopted and placed on the Special Review plat prior to recording the plat.
The plat shall be delivered to the Department of Planning Services and be
ready for recording in the Weld County Clerk and Recorder's office within
15 days of approval by the Board of County Commissioners.
2. The Special Review activity shall not occur nor shall any building or
electrical permits be issued on the property until the Special Review plat
is ready to be recorded in the office of the Weld County Clerk and
Recorder.
4111.4e1N
SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN
SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Howard and Jeannine Enos
USR-1027
1. The Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review permit is for a
single family dwelling on a lot under the minimum lot size in the A
(Agricultural) zone district as submitted in the application materials on
file in the Department of Planning Services and subject to the Development
Standards stated hereon.
2. Approval of this plan may create a vested property right pursuant to
Section 90 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance.
3. The property owner shall be responsible for all maintenance, including
grading and snow removal, of the private access road known as Weld County
Road 17, as required for ingress to and egress from the property to a
publicly-maintained road.
4. A Weld County Septic Permit is required for the proposed home septic system
and shall be installed according to the Weld County Individual Sewage
Disposal Regulations.
5. An Individual Sewage Disposal System must be located at least 100 feet from
any well.
6. An Individual Sewage Disposal System permit must be finalized and approved
by an Environmental Protection Specialist within one (1) year of the
application date.
7. All construction on the property shall be in accordance with the
requirements of the Weld County Building Code Ordinance.
8. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the
Design Standards of Section 24.5 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance.
9. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the
Operation Standards of Section 24.6 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance.
10. Personnel from the Weld County Health Department and Weld County Department
of Planning Services shall be granted access onto the property at any
reasonable time in order to ensure the activities carried out on the
property comply with the Development Standards stated hereon and all
applicable Weld County Regulations.
2;1.4.19
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, USR-1027
Howard and Jeannine Enos
Page 2
11. The Special Review area shall be limited to the plans shown hereon and
governed by the foregoing Standards and all applicable Weld County
Regulations. Major changes from the plans or Development Standards as
shown or stated shall require the approval of an amendment of the Permit by
the Weld County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners
before such changes from the plans or Development Standards are permitted.
Any other changes shall be filed in the office of the Department of
Planning Services.
12. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with all
of the foregoing Development Standards. Noncompliance with any of the
foregoing Development Standards may be reason for revocation of the Permit
by the Board of County Commissioners.
2 Al9
DATE: September 7, 1993
CASE NUMBER: USR-1027
NAME: Howard and Jeannine Enos
ADDRESS: 3704 Richmond Drive, Fort Collins, CO 80526
REQUEST: Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a
single family dwelling on a lot under the minimum lot size in the A
(Agricultural) zone district.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the SE4 of Section 8, T7N, R67W of the 6th P.M. ,
Weld County, Colorado.
LOCATION: Approximately 3 miles north of Windsor, north of State Highway 14 and
west of Weld County Road 17.
THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES' STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THIS REQUEST BE DENIED
FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:
The applicant has not demonstrated in the submitted application materials that
the standards and conditions of Section 24.3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance
have been met.
The proposal is not consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan
Agricultural Goals and Policies. The Comprehensive Plan discourages
conversion of agricultural land to residential development when the
subject site is located outside of a municipality's comprehensive plan
area or urban growth boundary area. The existing 80 acre site is
presently used for growing corn. The soil type is Kim loam, which is
well-suited for all types of irrigated agricultural production. This
parcel of land is not located in an urban growth boundary area and is
intended to remain agricultural rather than develop residentially.
This proposal is not consistent with the intent of the Agricultural
zone district or with the future development of the surrounding area
as permitted by the existing zoning. The future development of the
surrounding area is not designated for urban-type uses and the
incompatibilities that they bring local farmers. Nor is it cost
effective to increase the need for urban-type services in rural areas.
The proposal is not consistent with the intent of the agricultural
zone district. The applicants are proposing to remove 80 acres from
agricultural production so that they may retain a portion of it for
their future homesite and rural-type activities and sell the remainder
of the property for a similar residential use. Special Review permits
#1026 and 1027 are in conflict with efficient and orderly development.
Parcel size in the surrounding area north of State Highway 14 has
generally remained 80 acres or larger (see attached parcel
identification map) . The exception to this pattern are the two
parcels directly north of the subject property. Recorded Exemption
#1153, approved in 1989, divided 80 acres into 35 and 45 acres, more
or less, allowing two large rural residential properties to be
developed. Approval of these proposals will only encourage this type
of pattern to continue in this and other similar areas.
C riUf
RECOMMENDATION, USR-1027
Howard and Jeannine Enos
Page 2
Adequate access is not available to the site. The private road
labeled Weld County Road 17 which lies north of State Highway 14
provides access to the property. This gravel road is not maintained
by Weld County and dead ends approximately 0.3 mile north of State
Highway 14, according to the County Engineering Department. While it
is true that other residents north of the subject site use this road,
it is the staff's opinion that the additional traffic generated by the
two proposed dwellings will impact the condition of the road. Most
county residents depend upon snow removal and road grading provided by
Weld County on access roads giving ingress to and egress from their
properties. As development increases along this private road, a
demand for County road maintenance may become an issue.
391.4.19
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
Howard and Jeannine Enos
USR-1027
The 42.54 acres described in this application is part of an 80 acre parcel. In
1989, the 80 acre parcel was the subject of Recorded Exemption 1210. The request
was to divide the 80 acres into 34 acres, more or less, and 46 acres, more or
less. The Board of County Commissioners voted to deny the division, citing its
reason as evasion of the intent of the Subdivision Regulations and inefficient
and disorderly development.
Mr. and Mrs. Enos purchased the property in 1991 and through a substantial change
hearing, gained approval to submit this special review permit application. USR-
1026 has also been submitted by Mr. and Mrs. Enos in conjunction with this
request; they are proposing construction of a single family dwelling on the
remainder of the 80 acres. If both requests are approved, the land will be
divided and two dwellings will be built.
The subject property is approximately 2 3/4 miles north of the Windsor city
limits; however, the actual core area of Windsor is 6 miles away. In a meeting
on September 2, 1993, the Windsor Planning Commission recommended approval of
Special Review permits 1026 and 1027.
0lJ 4..1fl
selJa
Impg DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES
PHONE(303)353-3845, EXT. 3540
WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
140C. EY, N. ORAAVENUEO631
GREELEY, COLORADO 80631
COLORADO
Date: September 2, 1993 CASE NUMBER: USR-1027
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
Enclosed is an application from Howard and Jeannine Enos for a Site Specific
Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a single family dwelling on a
lot under the minimum lot size in the A (Agricultural) zone district. The parcel
of land is described as part of the SE4 of Section 8, T7N, R67W of the 6th P.M. ,
Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this
application has been submitted is approximately 3 miles north of the Town of
Windsor; north of State Highway 14 and west of Weld County Road 17.
This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments
or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated.
Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and
will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by
September 6, 1993, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation.
Please call Gloria Dunn, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the
application.
Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above.
1. We have reviewed this request and find that it
does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the
following reasons.
2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request
(is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town
for the following reasons:
3. ✓ We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our
interests.
4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be
submitted to you prior to:
5. Please refer to the enclosed letter. '
•
Signe,' : ? . �������ZZ�KW1/ Agency:C; ^��2R4d1,
Date:
ptCPi! -
SEP 7 1993 {1
"":1.4:.1. Weld County Planning
I }�_ ( F
WELD COUNTY 1`�
URBAN G1OWTH BOUNDARY 0
MAP y p ) NUNN
i I
.Y..�. 1
v¢y COUNTY 01.991196601.9911966901.9911966911w r
1 Y K11
966
ECSTING.W�,,TU \V �I4, v � IasI I I I
UMW 6FIC69191 Io den. -4
I \ 1 1 I I 1 1
Liiii
_...._�_..__- t PIERCE
. I
///
y a�Aa( AULT
et\ I4
po
Di' lik I .
? EATON /
•"`• o I 1 i SEVERANCE I I
WINDSOR
2 kid
II I II I it
2 R
I
I I I I I q%€ I HI III ,
I I I I 1 I I 1
I GREELEYt. I I
I KERSEY
—� I I ' I s t} yi 1 I um I N_
i IEVANG : N:
' ■� MILLIKEN Ht
I I s LIA SALL
JOHNSTOWN I I I I I III
GILCR EST
MEAD I DS /I I II
PLATTEVILLE E
I I
I I I I I I I
I
z I i [ , I I
0 I \ ,
9
I I
0 Ili I III' KEENIESBURG
istigijLUPTON MI 76
I 52 ...FIRESTONE
-
I pAC1 I AHUDSON
ERIE -
•�I1Vbl r ki
LOCHBUIE
i /1 -, �GHTON� I
r1 Q21.41`i
LAND-USE APPLICATION
SUMMARY SHEET
Date: August 31, 1993
CASE NUMBER: USR-1027
NAME: Howard and Jeannine Enos
ADDRESS: 3704 Richmond Drive, Ft. Collins, CO 80526
REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a
single family dwelling on a lot under the minimum lot size in the A
(Agricultural) zone district.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the SE4 of Section 8, T7N, R67W of the 6th P.M. ,
Weld County, Colorado.
LOCATION: Approximately 3 miles north of the Town of Windsor; north of State
Highway 14 and west of Weld County Road 17.
SIZE OF PARCEL: 42.54 acres, more or less.
POSSIBLE ISSUES SUMMARIZED FROM APPLICATION MATERIALS:
The criteria for review of this Special Review permit is listed in Section 24.3
of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance.
This request, in conjunction with USR-1026, is to grant two legal building sites
on an 80 acre parcel. The applicants propose to split the property upon approval
of both Special Review permits. If these requests are denied, the applicants may
still build one dwelling on the total acreage.
The Department of Planning Services' staff has received responses from the Weld
County Engineering Department and the Weld County Health Department.
The Department of Planning Services' staff has not received any objections from
surrounding property owners.
2214.19
' { ' r W rx`- fin .
,r y
. Fail)( ‘ 11 O
OCT 2 4 1989 q x�I v�
OA Co Maul tam
ma d9$ .FF
^• RESOLUTION ;" rpe
‘,..-1v
;
A
RE: DENIAL OF RECORDED EXEMPTION NO. 1210 - FIRST NATIONAL BANK '" ) ti
IN LOVELAND, TRUSTEE
�iYT `'
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, h f
Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home 4 °;K,
Rule Charter, is vested with the autharity of administering the zrP1y `; *t
affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and I ,P
x tC
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners, pursuant to its :4 ,, i Y'
t authority under Section 30-28-101 (10) (d) , CRS, as amended, at a
purblic meeting held in the Chambers of the Board, considered the
request of the First National Bank in Loveland, Trustee, for
Recorded Exemption No. 1210, and 4r.-17:43. t+
t F �;
WHEREAS, the request for Recorded, Exemption No. 1210 was to
divide property which is located in .-.1-
3,, x part of the SE}, Section 8, .
Township 7 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P.M. Weld County,
Colorado, into parcels estimated to be approximately 46 acres and t;
34 acres, and
WHEREAS, after reviewing the recommendation of the Planning ;I: ' ,.:
staff and hearing the testimony presented, the Board determined a
that said request shall be denied for the following reasons: '
4�4F
1. The applicant has failed to show in the submitted
application materials how this request is consistent w
with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan and efficient p #
and orderly development. K.+ a
2. The use of the Recorded Exemption would evade the ��w41 'f-
requirements and Statement of Purposes of the Weld
County Subdivision Regulations. °
..-i- 4...,...;....
3. The level of development and the potential for continued T ' "
divisions occurring in the area would not provide for
the health, safety, and welfare of the inhabitants of
the neighborhood and the County.
4. The applicant has failed to show that one or more of the ..,.
Ti-
Standards and conCitions of Section 9-2E. (1) (a) through '%,
(m) have been met.
s N
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County ` ; ig.
Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the request of First a° 4 �`
National Bank in Loveland, Trustee, for Recorded Exemption No. ���v: �'"
1210 be, and hereby is, denied. ^Y` ' 'I
891118
f
J '.- l 1. e
5
I
iI
r
r
•
E Page 2
..
t RE: RE #1210 - FIRST NATIONAL BANK IN LOVELAND, TRUSTEE , , ,
r
5:
The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made
and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 18th day of
t October, A.D. , 1989.
a
.`"72,3:14,,,,,
,ni BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ATTEST: 1 �{ WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
f (J
Weld County Clerk and Recorder EXCUSE -I':
and Clerk to the Board C.W. rby, Chai n
TI- .d e
lit.r e -. 121- ,S./ Gene R. Brantner, Pro-Tem
D dJReputy County lerk
APPROVED TO FORM: Constance L. Harbert
4
George Ke e�
U
ounty Attorney
Goer ' ' . c
9p
X
c4
1
.Sit
891118 i:';„
' Ilita
DATE: June 24, 1992
CASE NUMBER: SCH-5
NAME: Howard and Jeannine Enos
ADDRESS : 3704 Richmond Drive, Fort Collins, CO 80526
REQUEST: Substantial Change Hearing
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the SE4 of Section 8, T7N, R67W of the 6th P.M. ,
Weld County, Colorado.
LOCATION: North of Highway 14, west of Weld County Road 17.
THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES' STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THIS REQUEST BE
APPROVED FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:
It is the opinion of the Department of Planning Services' staff that the
applicants have demonstrated that a substantial change in facts and circumstances
has occurred.
The applicants propose to apply to divide the property using a different type of
land use application than previously submitted. A recorded exemption application
was denied in 1989 . The Special Review permit applications, proposed to be
submitted, will be reviewed under different criteria than that used for the
recorded exemption application. If approved, the Special Review permit
applications will allow a single family dwelling unit on a lot under the minimum
lot size.
931118
t.
106... t �; a 7 } ] .�' _'t.
• I 12 n1 ---,..,....r..HH \ik \ ‘ I • y
104. . . iiz. o N. �:\b.IC_. 1
I \ C IJ
102... cc • I \ r t V � .. _�_ � .21• 100.. . �. {/ m 6 "��
Y. � a I � pc ,
98. — — 1 Second ue.
' : L
OT L____
� •Re I . kV Q S'1• • \\• 'it • 4 I • • 11•\`° A ' fit
j '— ; r.c
�J
TBN. \ it 1. N a4'c*,
92... . �\ a.
444 1'
n xo \\., x, �xa \' . 4 ,. Tit
• xo zz ' .1x�.. G' ]. ; \� q•25 2 H H.. .. • TT . t \ H : ? n ,TA2
IT• `a.J 31 it
• ax n \�`S s, s�• . .•.3 • 1 zi.i •Y. J] �: 34
trip^• •• _
.3• I: •;-\3 : • .2 33,4\di lie 7 i'l
It 7 *1-'s• ) • l• 10 : STA 17,- • '!';, 7 di:
r:• .•• nm+°°e • as 9 L{d. ....
T7N.. ` c ,I ° •• • �` °• r ,} ,r s.
•J l•b r •—'- .t^r •I .: ice .c ;s.l— . 1 • • B
I \ ], •,• zS _0 Ia • t• " •S0 �•°• \ • er—� v
ii.78.. ..
•i ▪ 1,w, ew • - o CFE_J •1 • WESTERN.• 'o •J° rust.; RAILWAY• • • It• 1 • F
•
a]1 ;.EKR4t+C=Y Lae (�� • ' off:asss'• :
72... _ � • I . . •. 2 • .. N • • 3 '1; .../ i 'V• Iz .:l
ooh NV ..,P ? .• • I" 1.. ,• a •' ' ^�•• •� • • t •\
68 T 6N. •Ian 20a• sits .: ..a; ' . 'cif', • a• •w.7". a.00 '�-.. . �"'t�i. ., • ',w ( ' °.+.t e-
,°crev, FIJI .. �,(t> q•pq • -
N ,J ], 1 /r
D 3,3 \5 •• „Arc;yyF�ti a=▪▪ 's▪ ore959 • z• , otif •' �t�.
l
RESElt l'DIIC
5066 i
d, -- -7 7 ' �v l - -
5;55 ' ' 1 , - / S,JS1
ll
1 1 1
'
C
M V27-,c = 1 V � \:._ • P, I� 449e
1
,
-44� _ 1 ) : ,� , �1 �� I, -
.1
V
V' /// / n� .�..�
r ji
�i
������� -� ( �� I Mahairi, , ..
/ v ��' � '
17 V A 16 j5,, ',
15968 COLORADQ i, NO SOO
v r� n'. I I
�I r �aHERN I
I
� ' I 91
• o
�� ! I !1•1 1 I«•I. Mrllbw
• I r\-2 i1k---------) I) Ill. \ (
, I \. r , --,
Jw
ft
CuriSrni4A fib,
O�1(�',, ill �:% �, �� - 21 ��.,r... �4/
�� H• I�i
�'I i ,-/ I ��
ii) j/KI L C‘I I'\\ I '1 i I
4.
.,-r °. ''i,, ,I � � w89
f, l
i 1 ; • 1�h� ��� !_'
N $ .
aP 1.-
..
Sttt037)
v
, !' .. p
S141, 1. rt�x.1F'1 f• t
}r
.a"' ,Y' ". 91• \/Z.. •t • *Ill
tv is ti 'ti 4' i ) k +' a t
« 3+atw n s�... k 4 Cam U� y
t
<..t
r r ( -}r ::',:s1.4,
t - n.
•
t.
'^ \ ii*h .. 3 '!' {may. {k M
_ + -1— _ ;7 9 ;.4122 ' .. _ -
r+r
t
b ;4*;:ji
# e"` ) R. a 4.Rio # ': Y
*' .
r• it 44.14..!;1r :�. a
Pt' ` .... n
• i i w . Y {i *t s i
ar x
Per' • :,_
\ :,
/ 4Vi ♦ Ffiiky,. 9 :
u
'� BTTTt6 � _ -
�3� c ' :�•A t.'t/ r ' ( J. 9Mti /'
/
r14r4t A \w
ka� V Ay. �' 1�� i1 ° � ;• I !(4 t t “i ;' 5 +�«4t^- r�
I d .{. Nh'� r r 11 ea£ L Cr. i
a �3 1 t i if 4 3)'i�� 4t i i, ,:+ y #y ,1 t4 I �Il� J
� 4 �` Mrl� r o -nilt: \R t I��
si,��j'� ' ''��sw A .tins' ^ i i 4 r url .-
:� . ';4,3 �= aq ♦ lc, F ;ttt i '' u 1 V � st J I
A� T�iw r. dY 1 . 'Y ^ f v7
r 1� �..1F rs 'tilt4�.: r� ,N1;11?,';
S1 J,it. F., ,�1 r 1 J
4 N`1 1 "7jv °'Ory,� �}"'DfS �1 --e �y�� t ' F liA 4ft, rl y1i�1 k toti kiil' t '► A .
t ;14 ✓ti1x I. t 1' -N4 r. G1-y . 8 . - t� r��,e..e. '
oi
t ,l • ; tt„ k _ Y
st r- An� sW re 41-1.1771i.1.;!414 t
° i At. 2 J •d1 2+,{y{ 1, ) p
t#k?�hksn,IL. "3 r� { I 14,
-- }�l,J,-._ �`*�J it fw'..
a,� • _ ,,,,_-,,,,R.. .....,.-/..,. .-. ... . ...-.
tm,. J t • a A
'1 J17 l s 14i :4" • 1, 74.4^t" ' 7r
l i, .f tl` i• I+F .;S.. '4:11-•A•77•41..3'41 at
41* � .y
ter ! 1 r tl'
r y I v r)e!
4Q t-r«/ yJl;, �
k474'7, �tf§�ir lk ~ 4>�a4 fit_ ....m9
'+^ v a 'Y: � 1 t �.M. +r•4``i I+A � .t '/
ri 4 4Y r 1 3. r ',.',t,
t : � it
j t t V� � int «� '�•.
R 1 t l 4,-"""':-...13.t.,- I dy �� .i
..; nr J {t of A. � may, ,:,74'4, r' a '.
µ1� st r I A l 4y � , • s • ''.
4 V 'k i;i, i'a.�. 5 �."N•0<;.:14'411,y* "?t /B
� -\ \ ._i4f.� ri ify 'iiA rSS�1 • "�',hif..+ e ., t�
f y _ A 1 ery "LwYt r t Sd, w is � �
•
t < '9F ,.� . r-c,:ci +r". +3r�+.�yys —,PY i, '
1 _ � n:k a J '�P r - ' . .w 41 " fit°>Xr e33"' l: 4• ' rd'
Cy�ydrfi� 1�d{y'.`t`'>�a �r }"..�. t ru I , { '.,'u� 51� ';;, Y; '.
SP b. A- !i5 n+ r a"t �t y ��
V �,S ".44 -W: �' r ji t / s.r 1 . or, ia, Y4 ..ef•
iJ• e`' A f . : .£ Y M�Jr
yit,'r �i V�� �� l &•d' nwt {. s r '4r.C� w �.x.'(r "�++'. rd"a �`"` ' 'r f5�'rai a
1 n }t{ .trin tm jy —.5/4 !-44.°11--,,i144:,i ; 4 , ".l� a;•a a"'.-:,4.* t k.N• i l� i t Y 4
241,
I�t �ii4P I :rlo: 4' ' eA s- r o.rtd ttmfn l + + ,.a r f,r T
fC,i44 i ; x:1 i, d .'as>=+�- r; ..�..s
'"--' 11'fy R yy Ns i �.� s k 1 N. L
it
�I r. b' yY •���t it,'•
,
\,.ti yt sit . " ;; i
,t' `:� '4,40,..,070,..., , .,.v.:41.4,:;.... ..
, '1 µ'Iii ,,,,--‘,t,;;
�� (I1 .ri 't Je 3/4 t 1 C '
+3tR ,,.`5 }yt } lm a ,vr�A� 1,." "'�'r 1
. .
t" ..{ 1 ' i i.,,,,,,,.„„,.., , '�%.„,,,i,,,,..„,„4„,„ . 7„,.
It wx +jn;z
•i'3 .71.4“4:i4(44,•"!4•171 { ,kit.,?.' ar� 'a )
ti! �tl
.."+.'tr--
d - r L4 rh J..}
1' '
t 1, r r _
�- 1 !1W 4N �i�a yM -, I
4 i ;'F''''•0!:,•14
' L Rq bf M: - • ' -•
)• �, r 44C‘4:44“-47414%•4*4R^ A
r
tie
t E ;•--11;'„,•,,,,..;i. r - tU 1 r#131
I �, t 411 eq � : ' It ll:�lt gym- +4. o:
t t !a L k. \ L ,--13:::, t lA.�v .I
,,;.;.4...,,,.... r 141 1'-•,a-C4,.,'!;-,AC,',`,;kv n �. 4 G I 7 7 t
Flli r t I ! �
_� fits ry l A, i R; 'i Y.1 ,i
+t,_ • x .
I r r I i . .4 Y 'Ss� \ t nw T �. f' RR 7
FIELD CHECK
FILING NUMBER: USR-1027 DATE OF INSPECTION: / 3 -9S
APPLICANT'S NAME: Howard and Jeannine Enos
CURRENT PLANNER: Gloria Dunn
REQUEST: Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a single
family dwelling on a lot under the minimum lot size.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the SE4 of Section 8, T7N, R67W of the 6th P.M. ,
Weld County, Colorado.
LOCATION: Approximately 2-1/2 miles west of the Town of Ault, north of State
Highway 14 and west of Weld County Road 17.
LAND USE: N � / /tie/2,--.
2&/ ,/�� ^` ,,�/ f«"
E 'z"'21!J�//APLC��j�'� �YI1//"I�r�G/// tL /s7,7, P/[a4,�Y�'
S Q ✓ l0-l/!'J/
, r
W
7,-70"2----)
ZONING: N A (Agricultural)
E A (Agricultural)
S A (Agricultural)
W A (Agricultural)
COMMENTS: �! d���ff
i/
�. y % /7/' / .I/ Asa/or
' /r 2. -t� �L / Idi // //.f!_ ��L/y
�sr� , 72
.utl ii i � // 1_t o� / � ��/� -ice ,
.
'7,7 - ill /PI ie.°7 , VI re-"It C t9 —I •7)11/(th,
931118
FIELD CHECK
FILING NUMBER: USR-1027 DATE OF INSPECTION: August 13, 1993
APPLICANT'S NAME: Howard and Jeannine Enos
REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a
single family dwelling on a lot under the minimum lot size in the A
(Agricultural) zone district.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the SE4 of Section 8, T7N, R67W of the 6th P.M. ,
Weld County, Colorado.
LOCATION: Approximately 3 miles north of the Town of Windsor, north of State
Highway 14 and west of Weld County Road 17.
LAND USE: N 2 rural residences with pasture and outbuildings.
E Weld County Road 17, vacant agricultural ground.
S Agricultural production, State Highway 14, water storage
tanks.
W Agricultural production, Larimer Canal.
ZONING: N A (Agricultural)
E A (Agricultural)
S A (Agricultural)
W A (Agricultural)
COMMENTS:
The proposed access to the site is from Weld County Road 17, a gravel-surfaced
road which dead-ends approximately 3/8 mile north; this road is not county-
maintained. The property is a cornfield.
Gloria lun , Current Planner
93111s
REFERRAL LIST
NAME: Howard and Jeannine Enos CASE NUMBER: USR-1027
REFERRALS SENT: August 3, 1993 REFERRALS TO BE RECEIVED BY: August 17, 1993
COUNTY TOWNS and CITIES
Attorney Ault
X Health Department _Brighton
Extension Service Broomfield
_
_Emergency Management Office _Dacono
Sheriff's Office _Eaton
X Engineering _Erie
_Housing Authority _Evans
_Airport Authority Firestone
Building Inspection ____Fort Lupton
____Frederick
STATE Garden City
_Division of Water Resources _Gilcrest
_Geological Survey _Greeley
_Department of Health Grover
Department of Transportation Hudson
_Historical Society _Johnstown
Water Conservation Board ____Keenesburg
_Oil and Gas Conservation Commission _Kersey
La Salle
FIRE DISTRICTS ____Lochbuie
S Ault F-1 _Longmont
_Berthoud F-2 _Mead
Briggsdale F-24 _Milliken
_Brighton F-3 New Raymer
Eaton F-4 ____Northglenn
Fort Lupton F-5 Nunn
_
Galeton F-6 Pierce
Hudson F-7 ____Platteville
Johnstown F-8 Severance
_
La Salle F-9 _Thornton
Mountain View F-10 X Windsor
_
_Milliken F-11
Nunn F-12 COUNTIES_
_Pawnee F-22 Adams
_Platteville F-13 _Boulder
_Platte Valley F-14 Larimer
Poudre Valley F-15
_
_Raymer F-2 FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES
_Southeast Weld F-16 _US Army Corps of Engineers
)X Windsor/Severance F-17 USDA-APHIS Veterinary Service
_Wiggins F-18 _Federal Aviation Administration
Western Hills F-20 _Federal Communication Commission
OTHER SOIL CONSERVATION DISTRICTS
Central Colo. Water Conservancy Dist. Brighton
_
_Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. Fort Collins
Tri-Area Planning Commission X Greeley
_Longmont
West Adams
COMMISSION/BOARD MEMBER
X Richard Kimmel
931118
f mEmoRAnDum
Wilkfloria Dunn. Current Planner Date August 11, 1993
COLORADO F,appnald Carroll, Administrative Manager W�
sueiect:Howard Enos, USR-1026 & USR-1027
I visited the site located at the north end of Highway 257 and State
Highway 14. If this was a through road, it would be considered Road 17 going
north.
In checking our records, the portion of road going north of State Highway 14
to the end, is considered a private road and is non-county maintained. The
existing road is approximately 0.30 of a mile long, is 22 feet wide, and is a
dead end. The site at both locations of USR-1026 and USR-1027 is a corn field
at this particular time.
The access points show that a concrete ditch would have to be crossed in order
to access both properties on the west side. On USR-1026, the grade from the
road back to the property would be fairly steep. Once again, I would like to
make it clear to the applicant, this section of road is non-county maintained.
The road will not be graded, and snow will not be removed in the winter.
Attached is a Weld County Road Inventory sheet. This is submitted to the State
each year for the HUTF funds for open and maintained roads in Weld County.
prenos.mrw
Attachment
cc: Commissioner Baxter
Planning Referral File - Howard Enos, USR-1026 & USR-1027
AUG 1 1 1993
Weld N my Planning
931118
- a"
06 N ('I O) U) V1 ,Lt.
VI W U) U) U) VI IC 0 tv t' (V N tV (V N Z.
(i) V1 V1 0) \� 0) J
O) 0) n n n m n n n n n n n 01 0) OI 0) 0) O) O) O) 0 n n n n P n
CO
N T.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IS a1 LL IL 0 LL IL -H
C) as
a) 3
- coQ
V
20 a
2
x
m O n n n m n n n n n n n n n n n n a O) O O OI m m m OI OI
NP
3 W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
�0 0
O• N 42* k
y�
as C E 0 - 0 0 0 0 - O m CT N N N S (`41
ti
O I =55 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N - N N N N N
y=wy/// L T. N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N or
N N ..or
N '1'
N O N 0 N ,-0 VI m -t.
O 2 7 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N IC
N N N •
(
a LI) l() N 1[) U) N N t[) N N N N I!) It) Ln ID N N U) (0 (0 ' < '0 V L < d
F— c 0)
9. /�� « Ln m V 0 U) N m n 0) 0 R 0 CO 0 CO 00 003 CO 0 (0 N O 0
�j/ E0 O) N n .- - (0 O V LC) a .- .- N V ' ' N `- N m m O ° O N - 3-
O ! C 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - o 0 0 0 0 0 0 - v CO 0 0 0
++ _ - 3
0
,a F N- J
0.) 0 ,p
4+
L_ O = = 2 2 2 2 2 2 = 2 2 2 2 2 = 2 2 T 2 2 2 2 2 S = 2
H a = CC F a a F F F-CL a a a a a a F a a a a F (0 2 F 2 H F 2 a el
z z z O O O Z Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0000 0 00 0 00 < 00 0 0 000 ZZ ZO ZZ ZZ ZZ ZZ ZZ Z Z W Z ZZ z ZZ z ZZ
L
1-1
oN.o - a
a ¢ o I
O `0 o z o 0
Om o } 3 0- to CC m Z 1-1
U ¢
a an CC m U U in N OLD
v
U U X N X v a v X Q FO OF W Z ¢ ¢ Q O O tel
o ...� o ¢ W ¢ ¢ In ¢ a� r to a m } ¢ ¢ 3 Z U U U 0 m ,A
m LO N = ¢ ¢ O O 0 0 J' W ¢ F vSt
0 = 0 ¢ 0 ¢ O 0 0 0 0 0 Ln 0 7. CO p 0 N- 0 J 0 0 0 O O m ¢ J
N- 0 00 0 0p. N- N- O F- N O V H a I Q - t N I O v I- 0 (Nv N o 0 U
¢ F. N F- LC) Z - X ¢ N X N ¢ m X 0 3 Z N- - Z ¢ Y
F J 2 J ¢ W ¢ ¢ F- Cr ¢ ¢ F 2 ¢ ¢ J a ¢ U' J 2 0 a ¢ ¢ 0 Q
w 0 LO 0 0 0 ¢ N 0 Cr. 0 ,0'. 0 ¢ 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 2
N LO
0 0 a
N- N N. N- n n n N N- n n N- n n n n n n n n n n n N- N- N. N- n
4
3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 N.
N- (n0 ID 0 0 0 0 (n0 0 (n0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7.
10 Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z
o 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0
-0 V V V V N N N N N N N N N LO N N (0 (D 0 N 8 n OI 0 0 0 ..).-
N N N LOCO N N N N 0 tT 0 0 m N N N 0 0 O) OCON GI LO 0 0) V
CO CO CO CO CO NNNN CO m NNNN CO N N
0
00
J
O n n n n n n N- N. N- n n n N. n n N- n n r. N n n n n N N n n
E O O 0 O O O O O 00 m OO 0 m V N N O N O N 0 0 0 0 O 0 0
0)0 0) O - N CO V ID t0 N N N tD (D n N W CT O N N
0- N N NO) N N N N NCO CO CO m CO m CO CO CO m CO CO CO V V V
En 931118 '
� l mEmoRAnDum
WI`D Gloria Dunn
To Weld County Planning Date August 17, 1993
COLORADO
From John S. Pickle, M.S.E.H. , Director, Environmental Healt
Sublec-case Number: USR-1027 Name: Enos, Howard & Jeannine
Environmental Protection Services has reviewed this proposal; the following
conditions are recommended to be part of any approval:
1. A Weld County Septic Permit is required for the proposed home septic
system and shall be installed according to the Weld County Individual
Sewage Disposal Regulations.
2. An Individual Sewage Disposal System must be located at least 100 feet
from any well.
3. An Individual Sewage Disposal System permit must be finalized and approved
by an Environmental Protection Specialist within one (1) year of the
application date.
JSP/cs-1590
D
AUG 1 9 1993
WOO r-•_:niy Pinning
931118
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
I hereby certify that I have placed a true and correct copy of the
surrounding property owners and owners and lessees of minerals in
accordance with the notification requirements of Weld County in Case Number
USR-1027 for Howard and Jeannine Enos in the United States Mail, postage
prepaid First Class Mail by letter as addressed on the attached list.
this 10th day of August, 1993. /
931118
• .t
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES
' PHONE (303)353-3845, EXT. 3540
WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
140C. GREELEY, N. ORAAVENUEO631
COLORADO 80631
COLORADO
Date: September 2, 1993 CASE NUMBER: USR-1027
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
Enclosed is an application from Howard and Jeannine Enos for a Site Specific
Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a single family dwelling on a
lot under the minimum lot size in the A (Agricultural) zone district. The parcel
of land is described as part of the SE4 of Section 8, T7N, R67W of the 6th P.M. ,
Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this
application has been submitted is approximately 3 miles north of the Town of
Windsor; north of State Highway 14 and west of Weld County Road 17.
This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments
or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated.
Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and
will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by
September 6, 1993, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation.
Please call Gloria Dunn, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the
application.
Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above.
1. We have reviewed this request and find that it
does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the
following reasons.
2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request
(is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town
for the following reasons:
3. We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our
interests.
4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be
submitted to you prior to:
5. Please refer to the enclosed letter.
Signed: Agency:
Date:
931118
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
LOCi1TlON:Approdm.s, STATE OF COLORADO
8-1/2 sail west of the ss
mimes rte v e r T° of Ault; north of COUNTY OF WELD
war State Highway 14 and
177.. of Wald County Road I, KEITH HANSEN, of said County of Weld, being duly
ommmi Weld
will Planning sworn,say that I am publisher of
Public hearing on Tuesday, lees '�S4 erase,"we or
September 7, 1609, at — WINDSOR BEACON
1:30 p.m.for the purpose Tbb of considering a Site c ring witi be
Specific DwNopnem Pen held In the Weld County a weekly newspaper having a general circulation in said
and a Special geview Roo Commissioners'Hr,W.ld County and State, published in the town of WINDSOR,
permit for the property County Fins F-bor,W°Id
Gxribed below.Approval uTY M SIMI. Center, in said County and State; and that the notice, of which
of es nqueet may create 0ts 7smh Swx,Geeey; the annexed is a true copy, has been published in said
•vested properly right oti�°ndo. Comt.ments or weekly for / _successive weeks, that the notice
punuam to Cobrsdo La w, on:
ee es sh rot he was published in the regular and entire issue of every
above request ehouW be
APPLICANT:Howard end wbn0ud In writing to the number of the paper during the period and time of
Jeannine Enos Weld County Dawnment publication, and in the newspaper proper and not in a
W Inch An S411oue,O ley, supplement, and that the first publication of said notice
400
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: N' 17M AveOue,Orwley,
Pen of the SE4 of Section Colorado was in said paper bearing the date of the
8,T7N, R67W of the 6th 80631,beforethe aboveti /'
P.M., Weld County, dae or presented at the / .-- 'day of fr , A.D., 19e and
Cobndo. Sepember7,t public haring
on the last publication beal5ng the date of the
TYPE AND INTENSITY
OF PROPOSED USE:A a°pies of the application day of , Al)., 19_ and
° °fenb daeplry on a are available for public that the said WINDSOR BEACON has been published
lt und he minimum lot Inspection In the
;',.:.7:1_"701 (A6l req Department of Planning continuously and uninterruptedly for the period of 5
roved ula. Services, 1400 N. 17th consecutive weeks, in said County and State, prior to the
Mints,Pinney,Colorado 60691-Phone-3634846, date of first publication of said notice, and the same is a
Easebn 96e0. newspaper within'the meaning of an Act to regulate
printing of legal notices an advertisements, approved
Judy Yamaguchi, May 18, 1931,and all prior cts r as in force.
Chehenon,Weld County
Plano Comnuabn
PASS In the Windsor
Meeen en August 12, c P =LIMIER
Mt
ZX-
Subscri d nd swo to before me this / day
of / t..--7-
.., 191Z
luS 17 7he—,
NOTARY PUBLIC
My commission expires 6. 2 i N96
c _PT_ci_g ,
r_____
AUG' 3 1993
.,,,,t ., .....,?13aning
931118
Aft:(1 ' 44.4L.,,
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES
PHONE(303)353.3845, EXT. 3540
WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
C• 1400 N. 17TH AVENUE
IIIID GREELEY, COLORADO 80631
COLORADO
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The Weld County Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, September
7, 1993, at 1:30 p.m. for the purpose of considering a Site Specific Development Plan
and a Special Review permit for the property described below. Approval of the
request may create a vested property right pursuant to Colorado Law.
APPLICANT: Howard and Jeannine Enos
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the SE4 of Section 8, T7N, R67W of the 6th P.M. , Weld
County, Colorado.
TYPE AND INTENSITY OF PROPOSED USE: A single family dwelling on a lot under the
minimum lot size in the A (Agricultural)
APzone district.
LOCATION: Approximately 2-1/2 miles west of the Town of Ault; north of State Highway
14 and west of Weld County Road 17.
SIZE: 42.54 acres, more or less.
The public hearing will be held in the Weld County Commissioners' Hearing Room, First
Floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado. Comments
or objections related to the above request should be submitted in writing to the Weld
County Department of Planning Services, 1400 N. 17th Avenue, Greeley, Colorado
80631, before the above date or presented at the public hearing on September 7, 1993.
Copies of the application are available for public inspection in the Department of
Planning Services, 1400 N. 17th Avenue, Greeley, Colorado 80631 - Phone - 353-3845,
Extension 3540.
Judy Yamaguchi, Chairperson
Weld County Planning Commission
To be published in the Windsor Beacon
To be published one (1) tim August 12, 1993.
Received b :
S/
a
Date: J /
931118
AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS
SURFACE ESTATE
Application No.
Subject Property
STATE OF COLORADO
ss.
COUNTY OF WELD
THE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn, states that to the best of his
or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names,
addresses, and the corresponding Parcel Identification Number assigned by the
Weld County Assessor of the owners' of property (the surface estate) within
five hundred feet of the property under consideration This list was compiled
from the records of the Weld County Assessor, or an ownership update from a
title or abstract company or attorney, derived from such records , or from the
records of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. The list compiled from the
records of the Weld County Assessor shall have been assembled within thirty
days of the application' s submission date.
The foregoinginstrument was subscribed and sworn to before me this
day JkXl{{'6 , 1993 , by }-k(lLx)ORh )-, FNc
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
MY Commission expires: 9-/- 9'S CA-4-ex..)
r
Notary Pub is 3O /3 - s1`.
Cart la/ et 6)b31
My Commission Expires:
931118
NAMES OF OWNERS OF PROPERTY WITHIN 500 FEET
ADDRESS, TOWN/CITY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
NAME STATE AND ZIP CODE IDENTIFICATION #
1. Arthur M. and 1401 Lindenwood Drive
Evlyn M. Clark Ft. Collins, CO 80524 070508000021
2. Richard A. and 7730 W. 5th Street
Linda E. DeNeui Lakewood, CO 80226 070508000029
3 . William E. and 40361 Weld County Road 17
Jane A. Lentz Ft. Collins, CO 805244 070508000032
4 . K & M Company 3201 Shore Road
Ft. Collins, CO 80524 070509000009
5. Cactus Hill Ranch 38990 Highway 257 070516000054
Company Ft. Collins, CO 80524 070516000023
070517000060
6. City of Thornton 9500 Civic Center Drive
Thornton, CO 80229 070517000055
7. North Weld County P.O. Box 56
Water District Lucerne, CO 80646 070517000059
8. Charles M. and 642 E. Scorpio Drive
Esther L. Pittock Littleton, CO 80124 070517000010
9. Pineda and Sons, 35065 Weld County Road 19
Inc. , Windsor, CO 80550 070508000030
Mineral Rights Only
10. Larimer Co. Sheriff 200 W. Oak
Department Ft. Collins, CO 80522 070516000025
11. Big Sky 9709 Whistle Pig Lane
Mineral Rights Only Broomfield, CO 80020 070508000030
931118
AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS
MINERALS AND/OR SUBSURFACE ESTATE
Application No.
Subject Property A PART OF THE SEa, Section 8, Township 7 North, Range 67
West
STATE OF COLORADO
ss
COUNTY OF WELD
THE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn, states that to the best of his
or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names
and addresses of all mineral owners and lessees of mineral owners on or under
the parcel of land under as their names appear upon the records in the Weld
County Clerk and Recorder's Office or from an ownership update from a title or
abstract company or an attorney.
The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me this
AIL day of ,,-jtAl,1 , 1993 WITNESS my hand and official
seal.
My Commission Expires: (i- /-643 /
otary Publicil
,10 /3r4-,9"
6rReicy ( : boen3i
931118
LIST OF MINERAL OWNERS
BIG SKY, A Colorado General Partnership
1709 Whistle Pig Lane
Broomfield, CO 80020
Pineda and Sons, Inc.
35065 WCR 19
Windsor, CO 80550
Jeannine K. Enos, as Trustee of the
Jeannine K. Enos Trust
3704 Richmond Drive
Fort Collins, CO 80526
931118
THE SIGN SHALL BE POSTED ADJACENT TO AND VISIBLE FROM A PUBLICLY MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF-
WAY. IN THE EVENT THE PROPERTY UNDER CONSIDERATION IS NOT ADJACENT TO A PUBLICLY
MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, THE APPLICANT SHALL POST ONE SIGN IN THE MOST PROMINENT
PLACE ON THE PROPERTY AND POST A SECOND SIGN AT THE POINT AT WHICH THE DRIVEWAY (ACCESS
DRIVE) INTERSECTS A PUBLICLY MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY.
PLANNING COMMISSION SIGN POSTING CERTIFICATE
I HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER THE PENALTIES OF PERJURY THAT THE SIGN PROVIDED BY
THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES WAS POSTED ON THE PROPERTY AT LEAST 10 DAYS
BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING FOR CASE # bits f(0)-7 THE
SIGN WAS POSTED BY:
�o wexe ci I-- Evos
NAME OF PERSON POSTING SIGN
71
I NATURE OF APPLICANT
STATE OF COLORADO )
) ss.
COUNTY OF WELD )
SUBSCRIBED,.ANIl SWORN TO ME THISC " DAY OF tQndick_-.. , 19 L
SEAL r rw
A•••
lam• U• .•4:7
1p NOTAR PUBLIC
COQ p0\'
MY COMMISSION-EXPIRES rkw 1011h- r-11 L"r/C
LAST DAY TO POST SIGN IS: 1)Cp'J 02.7 19 c 3.
PLEASE RETURN THIS FORM TO THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES' OFFICE ON OR BEFORE THE
DATE OF THE HEARING.
931118
u --1Q7
USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW APPLICATION
Department of Planning Services, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado 80631
Phone - 356-40010' - Ext. 4400
-
Case Number use_ (Q a /7 Date Received 7— q
Application Checked by �
A Mylar plat submitted
/
pplication Fee # $pp Receipt Number leNo l
Recording Fee Receipt Number
12 BE COMPLETED Li APPLICANT: (please print or type, except for necessary
signature)
I (we) , the undersigned, hereby request a hearing before the Weld County Planning
Commission concerning the proposed Major Facilities of a Public Utility Special
Review Permit on the following described unincorporated area of Weld County,
Colorado:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT AREA: A PART OF THE SE%
Section 8 T 7 N, R 67 W
LEGAL DESCRIPTION of contiguous property owned upon which Special Review Permit
is proposed: Section 8 T
7 N, R 67 W
Property Address (if available) NONE
PRESENT ZONE A—agricultural OVERLAY ZONES NONE
TOTAL ACREAGE 42.54 acres
PROPOSED LAND USE Residential
EXISTING LAND USE Agricultural
SURFACE BFE (PROPERTY OWNERS) OF AREA PROPOSED FOR THE USK BY SPECIAL REVIEW
PERMIT:
Name: Jeannine K. Enos, as Trustee of the Jeannine K. Enos Trust
Address: 3704 Richmond Drive City Fort Collins
Home Telephone 4 226-3406 Zip 80526
Business Telephone 4 226-0655
Name:
Address: City
Home Telephone 4 Zip
Business Telephone 4
APPLICANT OR AUTHORIZED AGENT Lif different than above) :
Name: Howard and Jeannine Enos
Address: 3704 Richmond Drive City Fort Collins Zip 80526
Home Telephone 4 226-3406
Business Telephone 4 226-0655
List the owner(s) and/or lessees of mineral rights on or under the subject
properties of record.
Name: BIG SKY. A Colorado General Partnership
Address: 1709 Whistle Pig Lane City Broomfield Zip 80020
Name: Pineda and sons, Inc.
Address: 35065 WCR 19
Windsor Zip 80550
Also, fee owner of surface owns a portion of the mineral rights.
I hereby depose and state under the penalties of perjury that all statements,
proposals and/or plans submitted with or contained within the application are
true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
COUNTY OF WELD )
STATE OF COLORADO )
S nature: 0 or Authorized Agent
Subscribed and sworn to before me this
.�l��'day of 19
N6TAR (t ecx2no
' nECEhVE
i Sac
My commission expires 9-1 -939-1 -93 (7rePjcy CC EE?o(o3)
JU1. 2 21993
Weld County Planning
931118
USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW APPLICATION
of Howard and Bonnie Enos
The following is submitted in conjunction with the application for
a use by special review permit by Jeannine K. Enos, as Trustee of
the Jeannine K. Enos Trust:
1. A completed application form is attached.
A. The subject parcel of land is a 40 acre parcel, presently
does not have a house located on it, and the property
owner wishes to construct a home and fence some horses on
the property for the owners own use and enjoyment. The
owner may also do some farming such as growing hay for
horses. In order to obtain a building permit for the
home, the Weld County Zoning Ordinance requires the
approval of a Use by Special Review Permit. The property
is presently zoned A-Agricultural. On June 24, 1992 the
Board of County Commissioners approved an application for
the owner concerning "substantial change" thereby
affording the owner the opportunity to present this
application.
B. The owners presently have an 80 acre parcel of land which
is not economically feasible as a farming unit. It is
the owners' intention to divide this property into two
separate parcels, retain one for the owners ' own use, and
sell the remaining parcel so that they are financially
able to support the single family residential use on the
remaining parcel. When the owners purchased the property
they were unaware and apparently mislead by the seller as
to whether they could construct a home on the property.
C. The existing uses on surrounding properties are similar
to the uses proposed for this parcel.
D. The distance of the proposed use to residential
structures in each direction is as follows:
North 700 ' - 900 '
East 1 1/2 miles
West 1300 '
South 1/4 mile
E. The users of the property will be limited to the property
owners and their family.
F. There will be no permanent employees nor specific hours
of operation. Owner may hire contract labor for cutting
hay, etc.
931118
USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW APPLICATION
HOWARD AND BONNIE ENOS
PAGE 2
G. The presently available water that will be used is North
Weld Water.
H. The property is located on Weld County Road 17
approximately 600 feet north of Colorado State Highway
14 .
I. The vehicular traffic associated with the proposed use
will be very minimal as the property owner alone will be
using it only for residential use.
J. The type of sewage facility for the proposed use is:
leach field with septic tank
K. Fire protection can be served by:
Windsor Fire Department
L. The only types of animals to be used on the property are
those for the owners' and their family's personal use and
enjoyment, and the maximum number will be the maximum
number permitted under the Weld County Zoning Ordinance.
M. The only waste associated with the property will be
normal residential waste and this will be serviced by:
A local trash handler
N. Because of the low level residential use, storm water
retention facilities are not needed.
O. Removal of waste will be done weekly.
P. Concerning landscaping plans and aversion control
measures:
any landscaping plans if application approved are the
usual residential.
Q. Reclamation procedures will not be employed. It is not
intended that the residential use will cease and nor that
any reclamation procedures will be necessary.
931118
USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW APPLICATION
HOWARD AND BONNIE ENOS
PAGE 3
2 . The following written materials and supporting documents are
submitted as part of this application:
A. This proposal is consistent with the Weld County
Comprehensive Plan because it falls within the "Urban
Growth Boundary" as shown on page 32 of the Weld County
Comprehensive Plan. As shown on page 30 of the Weld
County Comprehensive Plan:
"An Urban Growth Boundary Area is located in
close proximity to a municipality. Within
urban grown boundaries, municipal type uses
and services are planned, and annexation may
occur. . .Goals and policies with the Urban
Growth Policy are intended to address the
development of land on the boarder of a
municipality. They are also intended to
promote harmonious and mutually beneficial
uses of land among the various jurisdictions
in and around Weld County. "
Because this proposal is for a large estate-type
residential development and falls within the Urban Growth
Boundaries and has the infrastructure (road access, water
supply system, etc. ) and is compatible with the
surrounding types of land uses, it fits within the
objectives of the comprehensive plan. In addition, on
page 26 of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan concerning
"Agricultural Policies" it is indicated at sub-paragraph
3 that conversion of agricultural land to residential or
other types of uses will be discouraged only when the
site is located outside of a municipality' s comprehensive
plan area or outside the urban growth boundary area.
B. The intent of the residential district is stated on page
30-7 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows:
"Residential districts are intended to provide
the present and future residents of Weld
County with areas in which to locate and
establish residential land uses and land uses
that are compatible with residential area.
The residential districts are intended to be
located, designed, and developed in a manner
which is compatible with the Weld County
931118
USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW APPLICATION
HOWARD AND BONNIE ENOS
PAGE 4
Comprehensive Plan and the adopted plans of
affective municipalities. "
As indicated above, this particular parcel of land falls
within the urban growth boundary of the Town of Windsor,
is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan as
far as development within the urban growth boundary, and
complies with the Comprehensive Plan of the effective
municipality (i.e. The Town of Windsor) . The uses
proposed by the property owner would be compatible with
the surrounding land uses as all of the surrounding land
uses or a majority of them are in large lot--residential
type uses with horses.
C. The landowners have grown agricultural crops on the
subject property for the past couple of years; however,
such production has shown to be economically unfeasible.
Because of the cost of the property due to its location
and proximity to the town of Windsor, 80 acres is
insufficient to make agricultural production on this
parcel economically feasible.
D. There is adequate provision for the protection of health,
safety, and welfare for the inhabitants in the
neighborhood and of the County for the reason that this
will be a low density residential use and similar to and
compatible with surrounding land uses.
E. This particular use will be compatible with existing
surrounding land uses because the majority of those land
uses are low density residential containing parcels of
35-40 acres for single family residential uses and
horses.
F. This particular use will be compatible with future
development of the surrounding area as permitted by the
existing zone and with future development as projected by
the Comprehensive Plan of the County or the adopted
master plan of the effective municipality (i.e. Town of
Windsor) for the reason that it is within the urban
growth boundary and will provide a low density type
development on the outer fringes of the urban growth
boundary and is projected by the Comprehensive Plan of
the Town of Windsor for residential use.
931118
USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW APPLICATION
HOWARD AND BONNIE ENOS
PAGE 5
G. This parcel is not located within a flood plain nor a
geological hazard area nor the Weld County Airport
overlay district area.
H. The property will be supplied with water from the North
Weld Water District as shown by the attached letter from
the district.
I. Attached you will find a special warranty deed indicating
that the applicant is the owner of the subject property.
J. A noise report has been waived by the department of
planning services.
K. Attached you will find a soil report of the site prepared
by the soil conservation services which indicates that
there is no moderate or severe soil limitations.
L. Attached you will find a certified list of the names,
addresses, and the corresponding parcel identification
number assigned by the Weld County Assessor of the owners
of property (within 500 feet of the subject property) .
M. Also attached is a certified list of the names and
addresses of mineral owners and leases of minerals on or
under the parcel land being considered.
931118
BOARD OF DIRECTORS ;`
ERNEST TIGGES a.". NORTH WELD COUNTY WATER DISTRICT
GARY SIMPSON
ROSS pi" HIGHWAY 85 • LUCERNE, COLORADO 80646
WM ERNEST R y�
C ARLESAACHZIGER .1_11y,� LYLE NELSON, MGR.
'
P.O. BOX 56 • PHONE 356-3020
April 23 , 1993
Howard & Jeannine Enos
c/o Mr. R. Russell Anson
820 13th Street
Greeley Co 80631
RE: Water Service
Dear Sirs,
This letter is in response to your inquiry regarding water service
to the following described property:
NW Corner of Hwy 14 and WCR 17
1. Water service is presently being provided to the
above described property.
2. x Water service can be made available to the above
described property provided all requirements of
the District are satisfied.
If contracts have not been consumated with North Weld County Water
District within one year from date of this letter, this letter shall
become null and void.
Additional comments:
Sincerely,
NORTH WELD COUNTY TSTRICT
Lyl . Nelson, Manager
NDL/ds
931118
kan T • �r 7O.
� f � :97 REC 02248926 05/02/91 15:27 >30.00 1/002 �=
o- x. ti' ►Ravia12b — t .754 MARY ANN PEUERSTELN CLERK 4 RA DER WELD CO, CO
Lr an; I SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED
-•a ,1 .,, ,a?5
THIS DEED.Male leis Eat dry of May .19 91 .
(a s bearer B First National ank in Loveland, a Banking
;, + Corporation, as Trustee y+ s-..
"ty_ i I coamy a Lariat .Stem of Colors.pamodal.and
+TY` .a State Documer.tary Fee 3
Jasmine K. Eno• , a• Trustee of the
-4':
Jeannine K. Enos Trust Date...a:T--�07-/9/ �..,,
n{ , S (it. -7 I
+3•`. aloe kpl edam a 3704 Richmond Drive ? + .a.
- Fort Collins, Colorado 80526 : .�'
4
���� of the Crane" Larimaz .sue Mcolordo.tranaelsC t„.-,,,.:'�`�as
fsG
Yf. Qb y wrm�7N.re+dm p.nwal.fee mad is ay.iawioa of the mm of r •-
7.W:r . D L4..Z4 one Hundred forty Two Thousand Five Hundred and 00/100ths ------ DOLIMS. 3."�. :
,1^t't � � _ I memoon awl sulkiesYd.ekakaeSY.cEvWWI.M • paeadr ea,tdasI.atiu a nunwtilel.and ey isle p.acma.k es pw. I -re •Y'
1. WPM.mil.cairn and codas.time the tlaaoofsl. her heirs and amps forme.all the real papcnY,macaw via in.p.o.•mema. ff 91
'Xi; . ': W is County of Weld .sawof Colorado. I 2-' RF4;e-
..� HaeY,aio,me.AW Wag .i Kr ..
denied w follows: I.
a' '- •s II
• See Exhibit *A{ attached hereto
f 're-� : f . ¢y 'LL-wed
L li. I -' .e'arV
I p
.
r..1 4
`. - are lame some endmaker er
i ;
IOGXTffii with all r SpS dm benasmem W appmw.ewn Mem adages.tie Is write.PPaweW.is the menses and ,. -i , _
t madam ea.ad teede6n.ap am sad imam polka heed:awl
a the Wale.Sea title.raem.Bic And d lad.Stew of da Ma'
peaodel it le V.ae.q*oL DM le denim eeresi ad maim w45 the lwnditmae eed eppeae eem �. .. '.,..
1O HAIR AND TO HOLD Si WI maim AmImoind W deaeaied.i45 the apgrwsaaa.m is pamU\ her vein aed w •71;14:
T` issisyasrkessoplfe its s f . its kW Mid pawed lepaamm•Iw am scS Woo ale suon.de e . e
Y. �' +T' s -^ they shag W RR will WARRANT ANDIORRVFADEFENDIAma!one!nradasW.+inr "Maud naaM '5 a pomMe' erweell xi.,fly::
' her ldnmd all or the or mend Op Mae a emir w paeaodsl )� -}^":•
mEi F. epiM seen panty perms at w1M
D1WDNFs wHE20tmepaan(alho lee eaavrd WadedOURS amerroM above.
First National Hank in Loveland, -. $ .''
- ie ,t ",''v - a Banking Corporation, as Trustee F :
finetwfw Y,k. ilerats..t YT eat VIrtawr .ae• :.—U1
Pi C4E.
STATE OF COLORADO r -
a Via„ -f :,% Caryd Weld - nflf`
The rgaly Ymemm. adsealedied bike me des dq d •19 .-'
1.4
mr-, : • ' by Morrison Ll,,JI$h, Aceoutlw Vice President and Trust Officer tor . .L.-..-?Bs:-
"' it w" Vast NA T40401 Loveland, Trustee � c
�. . e y �,.^pd...!t,- T•. N'IWaeeV Md Wdaaid eat .. s
fee` z's. Fib~a$J K;ua 4� Mr nomad.lea wpsw December 1, 1994 � T
{bi! �/
r.
/•• 1�S 011a 4r°; a� �J�
$r e =a f u `rte a.lea ads, A'_
'4'f- %."4°I 41 1113 lath Avenue — .
Ja ytf
" Greeley, CO. 80611 1
- aN4 Daea•R lrrf�aatwA • r ... :
.... - MM t4Ipt 7a4 MWIYMassM'IT PYIR a-' i.
Meer pentane.NN are S.Din W 10ai—Ia3I11.1-1000-4.14
sante`
a1 'sC7.44 B 1297 REC 02248926 05/02/91 15:27 10.00 2/002 ; €'
...4f , , F 1" MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK & RECO' 2 WELD CO, CO 0.
h EXHIBIT "A" - .
r s
tr h
That portion of the SE1/4 of Section 8, Township 7 North, Range 67 West '
- of the 6th P.M. , County of Weld, State of Colorado, being more
particularly described as follows:
,y4" Considering the East line of the SE1/4 of said Section 8 as bearing South
00 degrees 14 minutes 44 seconds West and with all bearings contained
herein relative thereto:
tc ""' b; Beginning at the East One-Quarter Corner of said Section 8; ,
thence along said East line of the SE1/4 South 00 degrees 14 minutes 44 ,'�
,,
x r;�, ,.1:" ` second West 1240.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning;
t thence continuing along said East line of the SH1/4 South 00 degrees 14 - -
minutes 44 seconds West 1405.00 feet to the Southeast Corner of said .S,SM+-
Section 8; e''''..
thence along the South line of the SE1/4 of said Section 8 South 19
degrees 45 minutes 49 seconds West 2168.46 feet; '
'a' +" thence North 00 degrees 06 minutes 51 seconds East 466.69 feet; '"'�
thence South 89 degrees 45 minutes 49 seconds West 466.69 feet to the
North-South centerline of said Section 8; ' :`
_ thence along said North-South centerline North 00 degrees 06 minutes 51
L - Y. seconds East 938.29 feet;
s^-, thence North 89 degrees 45 minutes 29 seconds East 2678.37 feet to the -_
" .i+.. True Point of Beginning.
,``94' EXCEPTING THEREFROM a parcel of land conveyed to State Department of
�,. ;- .a C a Highways Division of Highways, State of Colorado, by deed recorded March
"tea , 8, 1989, in Book 1226 as Reception No. 02172793, described as follows:
A tract or parcel of land No. 201 of the State Department of Highways, S.
Division of Highways, State of Colorado Project No. PC 014-2-(3) Unit 2,
in the S1/2 of the SE1/4 of Section 8, being more particularly described
`
as follows: _'
Y m _ Beginning at the SE corner of Section 8, T.7N., R 67 W., of the 6th P.M.;
' a. 1. Thence North 0 degrees 36 minutes 18 seconds East, along the East .
.. ”N •.. line of Section 8, a distance of 160.01 feet;
'g , . 2. Thence North 89 degrees 53 minutes 24 seconds West, a distance of
?`e`- -,, 30.00 feet, to a point on the West right of way line of Weld County Road `
�,'
17 (May 1988) ; ,
3. Thence South 45 degrees 21 minutes 27 seconds West, a distance of
,j. 142.04 feet; dt?r""'
, 4. Thence North 89 degrees 53 minutes 24 seconds West, a distance of �:
,j,,,g. ° �i++{f; 2,416.99 feet to the East right of way line of the Iarimer County Canal s;,
a i , (May 1988) ; '';..44!6;P.
w ' tr�)r 5. Thence South 45 degree■ 45 minutes 00 seconds Last, along said East
line, a distance of 37.43 feet; ,to,.;;
6. Thence South 18 degrees 15 minutes 00 seconds East, continuing along
said East line, a distance of 35.75 feet, to a point on the South line of 'f-' "'
the SE1/4 of Section 8; '�
7. Thence South 89 degrees 53 minutes 24 seconds East, along said South D xi"
line, a distance of 2,508.36 feet, more or lees, to the point of t.„
. : beginning. 0.-:-
'._
4
"-. '`- k : TOGETHER WITH two shares of the capital stock of The North Poudre Irrigation
" ". , Company and twenty-nine shares of the capital stock of The Cactus Hill Ditch Company 4 N
4 ..
f
s e.
...t
4
SI.✓n`s •}
,
1,
931118
r
at_
B 1298 REC 02249280 05/06/91 14:35 x10.00 1/002
pR2gg9260 No F 03' MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK & RECO R WELD CO, CO
QUIT CLAIM DEED
THIS DEED,Made this 1St day of May ,1991
I
between
BIG SKY, a Colorado General Partnership '�
!I
of the 'County of Weld and State of •
Colorado,grantor(s),and
JEANNINE K. ENOS, as Trustee of the Jeannine K. • 'I
Enos Trust
whose legal address is 3704 Richmond Drive I
Fort Collins, Colorado 80526 . II
of the County of Larlltler and State of Colorado,grantee(s),
I.
WITNESSETH,That the grantor(s),for and in consideration of the sum of
Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other valuable considerations
the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged,has remised,released,sold,conveyed and QUIT CLAIMED,and by II
these presents does remise.release,sell,convey and QUIT CLAIM unto the grantee(s), her heirs,successors and assigns. I'
forever, all the right, title, interest, claim and demand which the grantor(s) has in and to the real property, together with l
improvements,if any,situate,lying and being in the County of Weld and State of
Colorado,described as follows:
All right, title and interest of the Grantor, being an undivided 3/4
interest, in and to all oil, gas, minerals and mineral rights in and
under the real property described on the attached Exhibit A which is Iii
incorporated herein by reference, RESERVING however to Grantor an
undivided 50% of any and all production from 100% of minerals under
the above property for a period of 20 years from the date of this
deed and so long as production continues thereafter. It is the intent I
of this conveyance that Grantee shall have all leasing rights, bonus
and delay rental incase in said undivided 75%, 25% of production from
all minerals, and that Grantor shall have 50% of production from all
minerals. After the above 20 year period has passed and production
ceases, Grantee shall have full and complete ownership of said undivided
3/4 interest.
I
also known by street and number as:
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same,together with all and singular the appurtenances and privileges thereunto belonging or in '
anywise thereunto appertaining,and all the estate,right,title.interest and claim whatsoever,of the grantor(s),either in law or equity,to
the only proper use,benefit and behoof of the grantee(s), her heirs and assigns forever.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,The grantor(s)ha 5 executed this deed on the date set forth above.
BIG sue, a(blcLa o C nal Partrnrsbip I
y/ n%
as Fn*st he Vice Presidant of Furor NfiCCICNAL
&`NC IN ILX'JN , a reticrnl bsildrri accriatim'
as Trustee of fie Dlnld A. liaxl, O.D. Profit
aarine Plan, and as Trustee of tte May, I
Fatil)ver, Davis Profit Snariig Plan, partrers '
STATE OF COLORADO,
I ss.
County of
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 1st• day of May 19 91, III
by Mariam L. leth as F)sortite Vice President of FIFCT NoTIGNJ PPM IN la/ELAND, a ratiael
ksidn3 asseciatim, as Trustee of rte Dield A. Food, O.D. Profit awing Plan and as T stee
of the May, Faulkner, Davis Profit 9'nrirg Plan, partners of BIG SKY, a Colorado(anal
My commission expires Aral 7, ,1993 .Witness my hand and official seal. I
sohflY POBi;�;ItII
KRUM \k. uun,nau, .
TOVAR i
rl M� �O,
of in Denver,insert"City and." i t•Fp. %'%
'‘‘,E OFCO‘-‘.-�
No.933.Re . QUIT CLAIM DD® —_—_ --_�� ----- _— —�---Rev.3-x5 Bradford Publishing.1743 Ntrx Si..Dana,.CO 60202—(3031292-2500—7-s9 9 Q 31118
<I_"-"'s' B 1297 REC 02248926 05/02/91 15:27 J10.00 2/002
- F 1"' 'AR? ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK & RECORD" WELD CO, CO
. EXHIBIT "A" y
h
That portion of the SE1/4 of Section 8, Township 7 North, Range 67 West ,?
of the 6th P.M. , County of Weld, State of Colorado, being more particularly described as follows.
c ,y ^ Considering the East line of the SE1/4 of said Section 8 as bearing South
00 degrees 14 minutes 44 seconds West and with all bearings contained
herein relative thereto:
,+c "' •4' Beginning at the East One-Quarter Corner of said Section 8;
thence along said East line of the SE1/4 South 00 degrees 14 minutes 44 ,"
t. ` , y �,. '* second West 1240.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning; --�
thence continuing along said East line of the SW1/4 South 00 degrees 14
_ - minutes 44 seconds West 1405.00 feet to the Southeast Corner of said .+� -
Section 8; .,r y
thence along the South line of the SE1/4 of said Section 8 South 19
ys -_ degrees 45 minutes 49 seconds West 2168.46 feet; � '�
thence North 00 degrees 06 minutes 51 seconds East 466.69 feet;
thence South 89 degrees 45 minutes 49 seconds West 466.69 feet to the
- North-South centerline of said Section 8; =
thence along said North-South centerline North 00 degrees 06 minutes 51 `.
seconds East 938.29 feet; a `
4,- p „ thence North 89 degrees 45 minutes 29 seconds East 2638.37 fest to the ..-(1.W'' , «
.p.. True Point of Beginning.
.`5-
aparcel land toState EXCEPTING THEREFROM of conveyed Department of • '
rt
�„-„ �,�: Highways Division of Highways, State of Colorado, by deed recorded March .�^ s
8, 1989, in Book 1226 as Reception No. 02172793, described as follows: y
�+ ' F rr
� ,,.��'�''� A tract or parcel of land No. 201 of the State Department of Highways, <=&'
itA Division of Highways, State of Colorado Project No. PC 014-2-(3) Unit 2, `t,
in the S1/2 of the SE1/4 of Section 8, being more particularly described "fir T;ry,.
_ as follows:
',d Beginning at the SE corner of Section 8, T.714., R 67 W., of the 6th P.N.; 4i
�
1. Thence North 0 degrees 36 minutes la seconds East, along the East - ';
4V- line of Section 8, a distance of 160.01 fest; z
2. Thence North 89 degrees 53 minutes 24 seconds West, a distance of .:-.J'4—...;.,
30.00 feet, to a point on the West right of way line of Weld County Road ,,. �
r�
17 (May 1988); i x.
;c, -!:.r'.y.Y 3. Thence South 45 degrees 21 minutes 27 seconds West, a distance of ,},y:
2 142.04 feet; �r .
4. Thence North 89 degrees 53 minutes 24 seconds West a distance of - `s,
F.,g s Ate' 2,416.99 feet to the East right of way line of the Larimer County Canal x4..
e ����a,ve (May 1988) ; s t <.•
"' V,.. 5. Thence South 45 degrees 45 minutes 00 seconds East, along said East
line, a distance of 37.43 feet;
6. Thence South 18 degrees 15 minutes 00 seconds East, continuing along
said East line, a distance of 35.75 feet, to a point on the South line of >;.° - .
�- the SE1/4 of Section 8;
7. Thence South 89 degrees 53 minutes 24 seconds East, along said South s
J. ; line, a distance of 2,508.36 feet, more or less, to the point of #-<{'-
- beginning. '
4d
'W' 4,:._:4'; TOGETHER WITH two shares of the capital stock of The North Poudre Irrigation 'e r—
r., `r- Company and twenty-nine shares of the capital stock of The Cactus Hill Ditch Company s
2-,,,..-, % ,
•
r
w _ . „w
c _
11,7"
.af`
} ;4
t 9A1118
;At 1 ';-c,.':' < sT.iwt.v.''''y.,w:r,.' ''?."'"'''"'.'4.-".a 7 7.tr"ie.-.... ..........- . ,.. .. .v."nMa1Nwn
b n
i!..;,6'3 ., • '' sn rt r&;4 ,1 r„ 5'
4 13/4
r _I 5`53 52 ��I \ � ! ,� I ' c .,yx � J r " ' if. w u a a a , "YRa., ,� .,
x r, .l1 53 % Sv a. ♦ n i :� `;2 £ x ,x ,ii , .- .r w �Neix y q°�.. e ; , 1 a7 -qtr — .
^� d eg a4 I 4aik a14 i 4,e :4 ° �t
{a 7' I ! ,}f:. ?ilk, �s + � \'�s._F �ro 7 ,V'"' ,+d - #k 5',y7��; � i.
9 w
.eI.
3r' �� @ 'R' t4 48
a
5 °L '''',43,;4,4t3
�F'' Ii \ 1 • a'. ei t .♦ F.r 1a ,a s' ,• , x'�w-:;" + t
& i SIN , ,.. P , 3d � �,, ,Ait�' `
T M a
sisr
Y .r t.x -.: .rn ` arm `^ '�e 4. #f 1` "iI; �'''F t' r `•Ya'VN 'Z'} .Ru� -.14342
!' fr * ' J '^hFV 7,44y i
Di-
d it , ,‘,./s'•••-"-- - `ryrs .^4. i+p 44.-;•;:, r :a f iid ir
� yr MFG � k ,y >: •syr < Tit„,-11, -� � r`
1 ',1
a!a�
ilz
'r re E '3+ i - 2 ir.a+ a.,d a;w 7.,"‘" Yi �4 i .., _- 1 Wd..,, �,- j 4
'}7 ry �a `4z
} Ts.. d• S.i+ t x �i i' \ \ `l.
,� >, �;.... S r ,l ".e' . -a�rttyt _ u ••' 1 A , .li ,, ,
•.... 1 s rk C L.. "ar^+ Afar- sti` x =M :{ i {
s
x 3 fi> 3J a ysk- `'"" J+ f 4 it - �.rt.
X n "f4i L, _ �cR i ( . p •'{y3"ac, -;
3k I
� ;k -,,,,I" kb'g.. I p K`,✓ - [ — \'"a,
' �4.!
.4
'[yzP' 77 ! G'f Y.
4 f'',Si, t - I .,,` /1I5 \, )pv,c (tit allt• p 'i;- ry Jf 1r r'` �F; -.. 1/ r r {t�,�
` fS:n'y L.+K..,y{. k,k' /� ! ' �. -, R, " iy� �, .t(J f x
t,. Y
44.
S� l L a ir st,. f -a
WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, SOUTHERN PART 23
Windbreaks and environmental plantings of trees and The potential native vegetation is dominated by blue
shrubs commonly grown in the area are generally well grama. Several mid grasses, such as western wheatgrass
suited to this soil. Cultivation to control competing and needleandthread, are also present. Potential produc-
vegetation should be continued for as many years as tion ranges from 1,600 pounds per acre in favorable years
possible following planting. Trees that are best suited and to 1,000 pounds in unfavorable years. As range condition
have good survival are Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern deteriorates, the mid grasses decrease; blue grama, buf-
redcedar, ponderosa pine, Siberian elm, Russian-olive, and falograss, snakeweed, yucca, and fringed sage increase;
hackberry. The shrubs best suited are skunkbush sumac, and forage production drops. Undesirable weeds and an-
Siberian peashrub, lilac, and American plum. nuals invade the site as range condition becomes poorer.
Wildlife is an important secondary use of this soil. The Management of vegetation on this soil should be based
cropland areas provide favorable habitat for ring-necked on taking half and leaving half of the total annual produc-
pheasant and mourning dove. Many nongame species can tion. Seeding is desirable if the range is in poor condition.
be attracted by establishing areas for nesting and escape Sideoats grama, little bluestem, western wheatgrass, blue
cover. For pheasants, undisturbed nesting cover is essen- grama, pubescent wheatgrass, and crested wheatgrass are
tial and should be included in plans for habitat develop- suitable for seeding. The grass selected should meet the
ment, especially in areas of intensive agriculture. seasonal requirements of livestock. It can be seeded into
This soil has good potential for urban and recreational a clean, firm sorghum stubble, or it can be drilled into a
development. Increased population growth in the survey firm prepared seedbed. Seeding early in spring has
area has resulted in increased homesite construction. The proven most successful.
chief limiting feature for urban development and road Windbreaks and environmental plantings of trees and
construction is the limited capacity of the soil to support shrubs commonly grown in the area are generally well
a load. Septic tank absorption fields function properly, but suited to this soil. Cultivation to control competing
community sewage systems should be provided if the vegetation should be continued for as many years as
population density increases. Because of the permeability Possible following planting. Trees that are best suited and
of the substratum, sewage lagoons must be sealed. have good survival are Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern
Lawns, shrubs, and trees grow well. Capability class I ir- redcedar, ponderosa pine, Siberian elm, Russian-olive, and
rigated. hackberry. The shrubs best suited are skunkbush sumac,
32—Kim loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes. This is a deep, lilac, Siberian peashrub, and American plum.
Wildlife is an important secondary use of this soil. The
well drained soil on smooth plains and alluvial fans at
elevations of 4,900 to 5,250 feet. It formed in mixed eolian cropland areas provide favorable habitat for ring-necked
deposit and parent sediment from a wide variety of pheasant and mourning dove. Many rnestnongame species can
bedrock. Included in mapping are small areas of soils that be attracted by establishing areas for nesting and escape
loamy sand underlying material. cover. For pheasants, undisturbed nesting cover is essen-
haveT ieall the surface layer is brown and tial and should be included in plans for habitat develop-
TypicallyY pale brown ment, especially in areas of intensive agriculture. Range-
loam about 12 inches thick. The upper 28 inches of the un- land wildlife, for example, the pronghorn antelope, can be
derlying material is pale brown loam. The lower part to a attracted by developing livestock watering facilities,
depth of 60 inches is pale brown fine sandy loam. managing livestock grazing, and reseeding where needed.
Permeability is moderate. Available water capacity is This soil has good potential for urban and recreational
high. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. development. Increased population growth in the survey
Surface runoff is medium, and the erosion hazard is low. area has resulted in increased homesite construction. The
In irrigated areas this soil is suited to all crops com- chief limiting soil feature for urban development and road
monly grown in the area, including corn, sugar beets, construction is the limited capacity of this soil to support
beans, alfalfa, small grain, potatoes, and onions. An exam- a load. Septic tank absorption fields function properly, but
ple of a suitable cropping system is 3 to 4 years of alfalfa community sewage systems should be provided if the
followed by corn, corn for silage, sugar beets, small grain, population density increases. Because of the permeability
or beans. Land leveling, ditch lining (fig. 6), and installing of the substratum, sewage lagoons must be sealed.
pipelines may be needed for proper water applications. Lawns, shrubs, and trees grow well. Capability subclass
All methods of irrigation are suitable, but furrow ir- Ile irrigated, IVe nonirrigated; Loamy Plains range site.
ligation is the most common. Barnyard manure and com- 33—Kim loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes. This is a deep,
mercial fertilizer are needed for top yields. well drained soil on plains and alluvial fans at elevations
In nonirrigated areas this soil is suited to winter wheat, of 4,900 to 5,250 feet. It formed in mixed eolian deposits
barley, and sorghum. Most of the acreage is planted to and parent sediment from a wide variety of bedrock. In-
winter wheat and is summer fallowed in alternate years eluded in mapping are small areas of soils that have
to allow moisture accumulation. Generally precipitation is loamy sand underlying material.
too low for beneficial use of fertilizer. Typically the surface layer is brown and pale brown
Stubble mulch farming, striperopping, and minimum til- loam about 10 inches thick. The upper 28 inches of the un-
lage are needed to control soil blowing and water erosion. derlying material is pale brown loam. The lower part to.a
Terracing also may be needed to control water erosion. depth of 60 inches is pale brown fine sandy loam.
931118
24 SOIL SURVEY
Permeability is moderate. Available water capacity is land wildlife, for example, the pronghorn antelope, can be
high. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. attracted by developing livestock watering facilities,
Surface runoff is medium, and the erosion hazard is managing livestock grazing, and reseeding where needed.
moderate. This soil has good potential for urban and recreational
In irrigated areas this soil is suited to crops commonly development. Increased population growth in the survey
grown in the area. Perennial grasses and alfalfa or close area has resulted in increased homesite construction. The
grown crops should be grown at least 50 percent of the chief limiting soil feature for urban development and road
time. Contour ditches and corrugations can be used in ir- construction is the limited capacity of this soil to support
rigating close grown crops and pasture. Furrows, contour a load. Septic tank absorption fields function properly, but
furrows, and cross slope furrows are suitable for row community sewage systems should be provided if the
crops. Sprinkler irrigation is also suggested. Keeping til- population density increases. Because of the permeability
lage to a minimum and utilizing crop residue help to con- of the substratum, sewage lagoons must be sealed.
trol erosion. Maintaining fertility is important. Crops Lawns, shrubs, and trees grow well. Capability subclass
respond to applications of phosphorus and nitrogen. IIIe irrigated, IVe nonirrigated; Loamy Plains range site.
In nonirrigated areas this soil is suited to winter wheat,
barley, and sorghum. Most of the acreage is planted to 34—Kim loam, 5 to 9 percent slopes. This is a deep,
winter wheat. The predicted average yield is 28 bushels well drained soil on plains and alluvial fans at elevations
per acre. The soil is summer fallowed in alternate years of 4,900 to 5,250 feet. It formed in mixed eolian deposits
to allow moisture accumulation. Generally precipitation is and parent sediment from a wide variety of bedrock. In-
too low for beneficial use of fertilizer. eluded in mapping are small areas of soils that have
Stubble mulch farming, striperopping, and minimum til- loamy sand underlying material.
lage are needed to control soil blowing and water erosion. Typically the surface layer is brown and pale brown
Terracing also may be needed to control water erosion. loam about 10 inches thick. The upper 25 inches of the un-
The potential native vegetation is dominated by blue derlying material is pale brown loam. The lower part to a
grama. Several mid grasses, such as western wheatgrass depth of 60 inches is pale brown fine sandy loam.
and needleandthread, are also present. Potential produc- Permeability is moderate. Available water capacity is
tion ranges from 1,600 pounds per acre in favorable years high. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more.
to 1,000 pounds in unfavorable years. As range condition Surface runoff is rapid, and the erosion hazard is
deteriorates, the mid grasses decrease; blue grama, buf- moderate.
falograss, snakeweed, yucca, and fringed sage increase; This soil is suited to limited cropping. Intensive
and forage production drops. Undesirable weeds and an- cropping is hazardous because of erosion. The cropping
nuals invade the site as range condition becomes poorer. system should be limited to such close grown crops as al-
Management of vegetation on this soil should be based falfa, wheat, and barley. This soil also is suited to ir-
on taking half and leaving half of the total annual produc- rigated pasture. A suitable cropping system is 3 to 4
tion. Seeding is desirable if the range is in poor condition. years of alfalfa followed by 2 years of corn and small
Sideoats grama, little bluestem, western wheatgrass, blue grain and alfalfa seeded with a nurse crop.
grama, pubescent wheatgrass, and crested wheatgrass are Close grown crops can be irrigated from closely spaced
suitable for seeding. The grass selected should meet the contour ditches or sprinklers. Contour furrows or sprin-
seasonal requirements of livestock. It can be seeded into klers should be used for new crops. Applications of
a clean, firm sorghum stubble, or it can be drilled into a nitrogen and phosphorus help in maintaining good produc-
firm prepared seedbed. Seeding early in spring has tion.
proven most successful. The potential native vegetation is dominated by blue
Windbreaks and environmental plantings of trees and grama. Sideoats grama, little bluestem, western wheat-
', shrubs commonly grown in the area are generally well grass, and sedge are also prominent. Potential production
suited to this soil. Cultivation to control competing ranges from 1,800 pounds per acre in favorable years to
vegetation should be continued for as many years as 1,500 pounds in unfavorable years. As range condition
possible following planting. Trees that are best suited and deteriorates, the sideoats grama and little bluestem
P g
have good survival are Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern decrease; forage production drops; and blue grama, buf-
redcedar, ponderosa pine, Siberian elm, Russian-olive, and falograss, and several perennial forbs and shrubs in-
hackberry. The shrubs best suited are skunkbush sumac, crease. Undesirable weeds and annuals invade the site as
lilac, Siberian peashrub, and American plum. range condition becomes poorer.
Wildlife is an important secondary use of this soil. The Management of vegetation should be based on taking
cropland areas provide favorable habitat for ring-necked half and leaving half of the total annual production. Seed-
pheasant and mourning dove. Many nongame species can ing is desirable if the range is in poor condition. Sideoats
be attracted by establishing areas for nesting and escape grama, little bluestem, western wheatgrass, and pu-
cover. For pheasants, undisturbed nesting cover is essen- bescent wheatgrass are suitable for seeding. The grass
tial and should be included in plans for habitat develop- selected should meet the seasonal needs of livestock. It
ment, especially in areas of intensive agriculture. Range- can be seeded into a clean, firm sorghum stubble, or it
931118
Hello