The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About920450.tiff RESOLUTION RE: GRANT CHANGE OF ZONE FROM A (AGRICULTURAL) TO P.U.D. (I-1 AND C-3 USES) FOR JACK E. AND MARJORIE J. EDSON, CIO JAKE EDSON WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the 1st day of June, 1992, at 9:00 a.m. for the purpose of hearing the application of Jack E. and Marjorie J. Edson, c/o Jake Edson, 11623 Quivas Circle, Westminster, Colorado 80234, requesting a Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) to P.U.D. (I-1 and C-3 uses) for a parcel of land located on the following described real estate, to-wit: Part of the NW* NW; Section 10, Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado WHEREAS, the applicant was represented by Vern Nelson, Nelson Engineers, and WHEREAS, Section 28.8 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance provides standards for review of such a Change of Zone, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners heard all the testimony and statements of those present, has studied the request of the applicant and the recommendations of the Weld County Planning Commission, and, having been fully informed, finds that this request shall be approved for the following reasons: 1. The applicant has complied with all the application requirements listed in Section 28.5 et seq. , of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 2. The request is in conformance with Section 28.8 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: a. The proposed Planned Unit Development (P.U.D. ) District is located within the I-25 Mixed-Use Development (I-25 M.U.D. ) area. The uses associated with the proposed P.U.D. District are consistent with the uses described in the I-25 M.U.D. section of the Comprehensive Plan. b. The uses allowed in the proposed P.U.D. District will conform to the performance standards contained in Section 35.3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. c. The P.U.D. District will be served by the Left Hand Water District and the St. Vrain Sanitation District. d. Access to the proposed P.U.D. District will be provided from Weld County Road 7 in accordance with the memorandum, dated March 26, 1992, from Drew Scheltinga, County Engineer. e. The property is located in the Flood Hazard Overlay District. No other overlay districts affect the site. The mining of PL0864 920450 PLO?(PL- cc ' ('L, HPP ;`YleeetF ("/'J CHANGE OF ZONE TO PUD - EDSON PAGE 2 existing commercial mineral deposits on the site has been determined to be economically unfeasible. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the application of Jack E. and Marjorie J. Edson, c/o Jake Edson, for a Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) to P.U.D. (I-1 and C-3 uses) , on the above referenced parcel of land be, and hereby is, granted subject to the following conditions: 1. The Change of Zone plat shall be delivered to the Department of Planning Services and be ready for recording in the Weld County Clerk and Recorder's Office within 15 days of approval by the Board of County Commissioners. 2. The following notes shall be placed on the P.U.D. District plat: a. Uses allowed within the P.U.D. District shall comply with uses allowed in the I-1 (Industrial) and C-3 (Commercial) Districts of the Zoning Ordinance, except that the following uses are excluded from this P.U.D. District: retail outlets, convenience stores, restaurants, drive-ins, auto service stations, theaters, night clubs, taverns, car washes, and entertainment establishments. b. A site plan review is required in accordance with Section 35.4 of the Zoning Ordinance. c. All streets within the P.U.D. District are private and shall be built to County standards. All streets within the P.U.D. District shall be maintained by the owners of the P.U.D. District, unless other arrangements are approved by the Board of County Commissioners. d. Uses in the P.U.D. District involving outdoor storage of vehicles, equipment, or materials shall be screened from public rights-of-way and all adjacent properties. e. The maximum building height shall be 48 feet. f. The P.U.D. plan application shall include a stormwater management plan and a detailed master drainage plan for the P.U.D. District. All drainage plans submitted with a site plan review application shall comply with the approved P.U.D. stormwater management plan. g. The P.U.D. plan application shall include a plan for signage which complies with the mixed use development policies of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. All plans for signage submitted with a site plan review application shall comply with the approved P.U.D. plan for signage. 920450 CHANGE OF ZONE TO PUD - EDSON PAGE 3 h. The property is located in the Flood Hazard Overlay District. All uses and structures shall comply with the Weld County Flood Hazard Overlay District requirements. i. The P.U.D. plan application and all site plan review applications shall comply with the requirements of the December 16, 1991, letter from Mark A. Lawley, Division Chief Prevention, Mountain View Fire Protection District. j . The P.U.D. plan application and all site plan review applications shall comply with the requirements of the December 18, 1991, letter from Evan A. Hooper, Jr. , Colorado Department of Transportation. No direct access shall be permitted to Highway 119. k. Sewer service shall be provided by the St. Vrain Sanitation District. 1. Water service shall be provided by the Left Hand Water District. 3. Prior to recording the P.U.D. District plat: a. The six existing general notes on the P.U.D. District plat shall be removed. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 1st day of June, A.D. , 1992. Atigiaadart BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: WELD CO TY, COLORADO Weld County Clerk to the Board -.44-CL.,,bi_ q 7 G e Kenna, C airman BY: h 1X�/" -e;i0[6o Deputy erk to the Board Constance L. Harbert, Pro-Tem APPROVED AS TO FORM: /74 / C. W. Kirby , 'County Attorney GordaJf'ccr W. H. Webster 920450 HEARING CERTIFICATION DOCKET NO. 92-21 RE: CHANGE OF ZONE FROM A (AGRICULTURAL) TO P.U.D. (I-1 AND C-3 USES) FOR JACK E. AND MARJORIE J. EDSON, C/O JAKE EDSON A public hearing was conducted on June 1, 1992, at 9:00 A.M. , with the following present: Commissioner George Kennedy, Chairman Commissioner Constance L. Harbert, Pro-Tem Commissioner C. W. Kirby Commissioner Gordon E. Lacy Commissioner W. H. Webster Also present: Acting Clerk to the Board, Shelly Miller Assistant County Attorney, Lee Morrison Planning Department representative, Lanell Swanson The following business was transacted: I hereby certify that pursuant to a notice dated April 27, 1992, and duly published April 30, 1992, in the New News, a public hearing was conducted to consider the request of Jack E. and Marjorie J. Edson, c/o Jake Edson, for a Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) to P.U.D. (I-1 and C-3 uses) . Lee Morrison, Assistant County Attorney, made this a matter of record. Lanell Swanson, Planning Department representative, entered the favorable recommendations of the Planning Commission and the Planning staff into the record. Vern Nelson, Nelson Engineers, represented the applicant and stated their intention is to develop an industrial park for trucking distribution. He explained the proposed design structures and said the high-traffic uses will be excluded from the final P.U.D. Mr. Nelson said they are in compliance and they agree with Planning's recommendations and conditions. He said one issue, which was resolved this morning, concerned an agreement with Amoco for a 120' by 200' area at the southeast corner of the property to accommodate Amoco. This area will include a 200' buffer around it, which precludes building therein. Mr. Nelson presented a copy of said agreement to Ms. Swanson and Mr. Morrison for the record. Commissioner Lacy said that matter would be addressed in the final P.U.D. stage. Ms. Swanson clarified, however, that it is one use on the property. Commissioner Lacy said he feels the exclusion of the high- traffic uses is very important, and he questioned whether the access to Weld County Road 7 will be addressed in the final P.U.D. stage. Mr. Morrison said it would be more appropriate to discuss said access at the final stage. There was no public testimony offered concerning this matter. Commissioner Lacy moved to approve the request of Jack E. and Marjorie J. Edson, c/o Jake Edson, for a Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) to P.U.D. (I-1 and C-3 uses) , based on the recommendations of the Planning staff and the Planning Commission, with the Conditions of Approval as entered into the record. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Harbert, and it carried unanimously. 920450 QC_08CcC C. I I RE: HEARING CERTIFICATION - EDSON PAGE 2 This Certification was approved on the 3rd day of June, 1992. 110$44, APPROVED: ATTEST: 1V44,4Wetin BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD CO TY, COLORADO Weld County Clerk to the Board By: ��A1102, itTra Geo e Kenn y, C airman Deputy Cgerk to the Board Constance L. Harbert, Pro-Tem TAPE #92-18 C. W. Kir y DOCKET #92-21 Gor o ac PL0864 W. H. Webster 920450 ATTENDANCE RECORD HEARINGS ARE AS FOLLOWS ON THIS 1st DAY OF June 1992: DOCKET It 92-17 - Create Weld County Road 32 Local Improvement District #1992-1 DOCKET I! 92-18 - Create Weld County Road 34 Local Improvement District #1992-2 DOCKET If 92-21 - Change of Zone - Edson, Jack E. and Marjorie, c/o Jake Edson DOCKET II 92-22 - Change of Zone - W.S.W. , Inc. , c/o Thomas E. Selders PLEASE write or print your name legibly, your address and the DOCKET 4 (as listed above) or the name of the applicant of the hearing you are attending. NAME ADDRESS HEARING ATTENDING Jam/! /„)G// g2Z' / S1— 5-26 �Y' 97 77 r ,..., .•" �o/.f tie, 0!J 9 1 ' = "--,:>.4,---) ,J cJ ,et.y,, G , r -. K //.{72/ 3 etic R 6 6 l,�1 SW C3' �,r �/,z 1., 1,_ /-Z ,IL/i,tis U r .a /N- �v »y,erc> C 3 H �3 14.01 ...K„ --Cc .3.. _ cteeeta, e_o . ('�``�"�,' /'(� /a)c2 Wc' R7 /l //l f-0///2//�9rn'1 Lo hfrn-,<.J` e,,• Zc , O-)n deli0 `Y 7 " G, u_' C J2 7 r C\.0.\5\CQ\\S �.( S*X14 14 �.� W.rcxuv_rro , Q �.A c �l� qG� W S�C) 920450 NOT I C E Pursuant to the zoning laws of the State of Colorado and the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, a public hearing will be held in the Chambers of the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, First Floor, Greeley, Colorado, at the time specified. All persons in any manner interested in the following proposed Change of Zone are requested to attend and may be heard. Should the applicant or any interested party desire the presence of a court reporter to make a record of the proceedings, in addition to the taped record which will be kept during the hearing, the Clerk to the Board's Office shall be advised in writing of such action at least five days prior to the hearing. The cost of engaging a court reporter shall be borne by the requesting party. BE IT ALSO KNOWN that the text and maps so certified by the Weld County Planning Commission may be examined in the office of the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners, located in the Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Third Floor, Greeley, Colorado. APPLICANT DOCKET NO. 92-21 Jack E. and Marjorie J. Edson Z Jake Edson 11623 Quivas Circle Westminster, Colorado 80234 DATE: June 1, 1992 TIME: 9:00 A.M. REQUEST: Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) to P.U.D. (I-1 and C-3 uses) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NW* NW,' of Section 10, Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado (Lot A of Recorded Exemption 103) LOCATION: Approximately 2.5 miles east of the City of Longmont; east of Weld County Road 7, and south of Highway 119 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO BY: DONALD D. WARDEN WELD COUNTY CLERK TO THE BOARD BY: Betty Henson, Deputy DATED: April 27, 1992 PUBLISHED: April 30, 1992, in The New News _ 9 X�j � n� / • • STATE OF COLORADO ) Is.s. COUNTY OF WELD I David De Reynolds, being duly swdrT says that he is publisher of The New News, a weekly newspaper published in K and State; that said newspaper said County general circulationpdpCr my a and has been in s y said County unintr.rruptrdl�tinously and NOTICE Curing a y ' of lte least ;herein, mod -to tye� fist _ period of at least PtaZa�r, cant fifty two consecutive weeks prior to bal.;tlm the a the first publication of the annexed d aura time notice; that said newspaper is :i mow` Colorado weld county Ceti+ual calla sir d, Street,the Fuss. news Zahsdm. at paper within the meaning of the �ie8°guoavg popaeed act of the General Assembly of the �ad0 of Zbel:ra e d px are requested to State of Colorado,, entitled "An Act f the to regulate the printing record notices and advertisements, " and legal reconi aced the amendments thereto; that the notice h �oakwu . saaim ail ru lead fi m of which the annexed is a printed 4= The a �m reeppo ter shautbe borne a the copy taken from said newspaper, was . and icriowN that the text published in said newspaper, and in mama the<Ikeda* Qedc a �° � w� the regular and entire issue of d e every number thereof , �aaea m he w ca�tlery,slr lath Sheet, Floor, 11623 once a week YOr J.AFT FLICAIN -Jack E. andMarjaie Gucc til Ve weeks; that said notice Mo Jake Elea, -Colorado aide - w�rir:da, Colorado`":a so published in 'said newspaper DATE: June >sr TIME: m A�a. proper and not in an t-R I o ON t-i ' thereof the lement � and that first IFfial DESCRIpIION: Fart d the publication of said notice as 1V11/4 N"1/°d °on ls, Townshw PM Raga . Wes[ d d 6th aforesaid, was on the Recor Colorado d03) ed IrcATION:( Avrro hnateq, 2$miles 3.2 eedeast d the Ca Cam* Roadl'°r�@t'aR; east d day of E.4.4.______:, COMMISIlIONERS H�hayl 7, and so0 d and the last on the 3° wFJn C° °°l°N"°° day of BY: DONALD WARDEN WELD COUNTY QERK TO THE BOARD By.: Bels,Hason,Deputy ^ -�-. Wile'gin, nisi in Mt 'Ze"c�� Subscribed and sworn o before ra me this , day of JJtn7 19 , • i << ,ra m-!4 My nr. sor:. 920450 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Notice of Hearing, Docket #92-21, was placed in the United States mail, postage prepaid, addressed to the following property owners. DATED this 11th day of May, 1992. Deputy Clerk to(he Board Amoco Production Company 1670 Broadway Denver, CO 80217 Randall S. and Alicia Lofquist 1115 Princeton Drive Longmont, CO 80501 Shirley Jean Boyd Gerald Wayne Moore Elmer Moore, Trustees 3101 Highway 119 Longmont, CO 80501 The Rademacher Family Partnership, Ltd. 3525 Highway 119 Longmont, CO 80501 JCK Gravel, Inc. % Katherine Oliver 4465 Pioneer Drive Greeley, CO 80634 Mountain Empire Dairymen's Assoc. , Inc. P. 0. Box 2730 Salt Lake City, UT 84110 Edward E. Hodges aka, Ernest Edwards and Eleanor Hodges 10759 Weld County Road 7 Longmont, CO 80504 Rosie Heaton 2702 Highway 119 Longmont, CO 80501 920450 St. Vrain Ltd. % Richard Domenicio 8200 West 67 Arvada, CO 80004 William L. and Shirley J. Silvers 10608 Weld County Road 7 Longmont, CO 80501 Jack E. and Marjorie J. Edson 1482 Leisure World Meza, AZ 85206 Dorothy E. Larson 10706 Weld County Road 7 Longmont, CO 80501 Jack E. and Marjorie J. Edson % Jake Edson 11623 Quivas Circle Westminster, CO 80234 LaVern C. Nelson, P.E. Nelson Engineers Greeley National Plaza 822 7th Street Greeley, CO 80631 320450 AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 29th day of May, 1992 by and between Amoco Production Company ("Amoco") with an office at 1670 Broadway, Denver, Colorado 80202 and Jack E. and Marjorie J. Edson (the "Edsons") , whose address is 1482 Leisure World, Mesa, Arizona 85206. RECITALS A. The Edsons own approximately 36 acres of the surface estate in the NW/4 NW/4 of Section 10 , Township 2 North, Range 68 West, Weld County, Colorado (the "Premises") . B. The Edsons intend to develop an industrial park consisting of warehouses used for trucking distribution on the Premises. C. The plat attached to this Agreement as Attachment 1 reflects the lots for the proposed facilities on the Premises. D. Amoco owns oil and gas leases pertaining to the right to explore for, develop and produce oil and gas underlying the Premises. E. Current Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission rules and regulations allow the owner of the oil and gas rights underlying the Premises to locate at least two drillsites on the NW/4 NW/4 of Section 10, one to be located in approximately the center of the quarter quarter section and one to be located in the center of the quarter section. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and the mutual promises set forth herein, including the representations set forth in the recitals, the parties agree as follows: 1. Drillsite Locations and Access (a) Location in the Center of the NW/4 . With respect to one or two wells that Amoco desires to drill in this location, Amoco shall locate one or both drillsites for the center of the NW/4 within the legal spacing location, but no greater than 7,20 feet from the south line and no greater than 200 feet from the east line in the extreme southeast corner of the Premises (the "Drillsite Location") as shown in the attached plat. In addition, a buffer zone (the "Buffer Zone") shall exist for a distance of 200 feet to the north and west of the Drillsite Location. The Edsons shall not construct a warehouse within the Buffer Zone or Drillsite Location. (b) Location in the Center of the NW/4 NW/4 . Amoco shall have the right and option to apply for a location exception to this location. It will seek approval to EXHIBIT ' 920450 locate a Codell/Niobrara or Sussex/ Shannon well within the location reserved in Paragraph 1 (a) , above. In the event Amoco is not granted such location exception, the parties shall negotiate in good faith to reach agreement as to an acceptable drilling location. (c) The Edsons shall either modify their rezoning application to Weld County to remove the Drillsite Location or shall request that Amoco shall retain its use by right for the location and drilling of said wells. 2 . Access. Access to the Drillsite Location and easements for roads and pipelines shall be at mutually acceptable locations which are convenient to Amoco. Provided, however, Amoco shall use its best efforts to access the Drillsite Location by the existing road that borders the south line of the Premises. Amoco shall have the right to the use of any and all roads constructed by the Edsons, including the road shown as Attachment 1 (the "Road") , for oil and gas operations; provided, however, neither Amoco, nor the Edsons shall unreasonably interfere with the use of the Road by any other party. The Edsons shall require any third parties not to so unreasonably interfere with Amoco' s use of the Road. Amoco shall promptly repair any damage which it causes to the Road. 3 . Surface Damages. As consideration for the inconvenience to Amoco of giving up its rights to drill the well in the center of the NW/4 NW/4 , and in consideration for Amoco not objecting to the Edsons ' application to Weld County to develop the industrial park, the Edsons waive any rights they have to surface damages for the wells which Amoco locates on the described premises at locations other than the center of the NW/4 NW/4 . 4 . Indemnification. Amoco and the Edsons (with the Edsons being jointly and severally liable under this agreement) each agree to defend, indemnify and hold the other harmless for injuries to persons and damage to property caused by its own negligence or willful misconduct or for claims for which it is strictly liable. 5 . Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding upon the successors and assigns of the parties and the benefits of this Agreement shall inure to their successors and assigns. 6 . Entire Agreement. This Agreement represents the entire agree- ment between the parties and supersedes any and all prior oral or written agreements. This Agreement shall not be amended except in writing signed by all parties. - 2 - , 920450 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned parties have caused this Agreement to be executed on the day and year first above written. AMOCO PRODUCTION COMPANY By: A1-I . 1 ,. 1 0 Attorney-in-Fact (TM/&t2 ar orie 1. Edson STATE OF COLORADO ) CITY AND ss. COUNTY OF DENVER ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged 1I before me this ;n7714 day of , AMA , 1992 , by J . }4 • 4T Aso Le Attorney- in-Fact for AM CO PRODUCTION COMPANY, a corporation. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Notary Pub is My Commission expires: STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. COUNTY OF Vet ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this a(9 4 day of . , 1992 , by Jack E. Edson. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Notary Pub c My Commission expires: //`2/q - 3 - �V5 920450 STATE OF COLORADO ) J ) ss. COUNTY OF g :C /t ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 9Iq( day of /),�%ci ,, 1992 , by Marjorie J. Edson. WITNESS my hand and official seal. • otary Public • my Commission expires: p Lee' cD.Sc0 / - 4 - 920450 A7174Crfa4En1r I — z t 14 r"J. GUsi✓ CO. ti #7 • 9190 _i. u., 3J' cti"W //0>.65 ... _ __ r) 3U.m' 's Cr __.._ _ ....-_... _ - - - ---rte ESQ o,do' N ; Aq� m N.11. sZ.,.. A ti �T. '.' 1 6. aj �� O� ? II N si�� _ ,---, I i ySSop v u t . yy 1 • %.41,_ �a_ � \ ., 1 \ •Ca y 7,, 5¢40 t 5900 I UN I • -.16co0 Ia a 1p 1 i 6/00 -. C I ' O __ a• I 6Zoo / 7"43_.__ .___�_ __.._� ._.___ .I SO e ,d� _ _ ear : _— t J •t63w 920450 S(IS 177 y'';`y` ?t7 PSI 2: 23 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN CLL�6ARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SIGN POSTING CERTIFICATE TO THE BOA?U I HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER THE PENALTIES OF PERJURY THAT THE SIGN PROVIDED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES WAS POSTED ON THE PROPERTY AT LEAST TEN DAYS PRECEDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING FOR CASE S- Z-466 THE SIGN WAS POSTED BY: May 19, 1992 Nelson Engineers, as agent for Applicant: LaVern C. Nelson NAME OF PERSON POSTING SIGN SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS COUNTY OF WELD ) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS 19thDAY OF May 19 92. SEAL YC OOTARY P i T MY COMMISSION EXPIRES April 13, 1993 LAST DAY TO POST SIGN IS: May 22, 19 92 . 920450 COVITY SUMMARY OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ,,,In `, P92 !PP 2/7PrA4 93 56992 A regular meeting of the Weld County Planning Commissia ;4 held April 21, 1992, in the County Commissioners' Hearing Room (Room /DINE 14®):{d?Lcounty Centennial Building, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado. The meeting was called to order by the Chairman, Bud Clemons at 1:30 p.m. Tape 412 Roll Call Richard Kimmel Present Jean Hoffman Present Tom Rulon Present Bill O'Hare Present Judy Yamaguchi Present LeAnn Reid Absent Don Feldhaus Present Shirley Camenisch Absent Bud Clemons Present Also present: Brian A. Grubb, Current Planner, Department of Planning Services, Bruce Barker, Assistant County Attorney, Sharyn Ruff, Secretary. The summary of the last regular meeting of the Weld County Planning Commission held on April 7, 1992, was approved with corrections to the Vice-Chairman, who chaired the meeting, referred to as Chairman in a few instances. CASE NUMBER: Z-466 ;��g am�.,^^ NAME: Jack E. and Marjorie J Jfr4'o Jake Edson ADDRESS: 11623 Quivas Circle Westminster, CO 80234 REQUEST: A Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) to P.U.D. (I-1 and C-3 uses) . LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NW4 NW4 of Section 10, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado (Lot A of Recorded Exemption 103) . LOCATION: Approximately 2.5 miles east of the City of Longmont; east of Weld County Road 7, south of Highway 119. Vern Nelson, representative for the applicant, Jack E. and Marjorie J . Edson, c/o Jake Edson, explained this application for a change of Zone complies with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan and the I-25 Mixed Use Development Area. He explained once the change of zone was approved they would be better able to proceed in depth when addressing the issues of the proposed Planned Unit Development. Access to the site will be from Weld County Road 7. The Left Hand Water District will supply water, and St. Vrain Sanitation District will provide sewer. 920450 kXlt / i a C . SUMMARY OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING April 21, 1992 Page 2 Bill O'Hare asked what impact this proposal would have on the present Agricultural zone. Vern Nelson explained the property is not considered high quality agricultural land. Jean Hoffman asked about the sand and gravel mining in the area and what, if any, increase in traffic would be. Vern Nelson said the sand and gravel pits in that area have been mined out, no active mining is taking place. The Chairman asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak for or against this application. No one wished to speak. Richard Kimmel moved Case Number Z-466 be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with the Planning Commissions recommendation for approval. Judy Yamaguchi seconded the motion. The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Richard Kimmel - yes; Jean Hoffman - yes; Tom Rulon - yes; Bill O'Hare - yes; Judy Yamaguchi - yes; Don Feldhaus - yes; Bud Clemons - yes. Motion carried unanimously. CASE NUMBER: ended USR-685 NAME: Stephani Stokes ADDRESS: 14253 ighway 392, Greeley, Colo ado 80631 REQUEST: An Amen ed Site Specific Devel pment Plan for the expansion of a kennel an boarding facility i the A (Agricultural) zone district, not to exc d 140 dogs and 20/cats. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: art of the SW4/ of Section 16, T6N, R66W of the 6th P. . , Weld Coun y, Colorado LOCATION: Approximately 3 iles nort of the City of Greeley; north of Highway 392, and approx ately /4 mile east of Weld County Road 29. (Agricultural) Zon Distr ct and is provided for as a Use by Special Review. \ Tom Hellerick, Attorney, represen tive for the applicant, Stephanie Stokes, applicant, explained they have be n 'n the kennel business for 28 years. This application is to amend the existi g Us by Special Review to include; extensions of outdoor and indoor runs, trai ing cl ses, expansion of number of employees, and an increase of two more hour , from 7.00 a.m. until 9:00 p.m. for dogs to be outdoors. Jean Hoffman asked how long a applicant ha3 owned this particular property. Tom Hellerick said they have wned this proper"i since 1991. Stephanie Stokes gave an overview of the oper tion explaining theX use pea gravel in all of the kennels, the larger areas will have grass, andscaped areas, and all of the exercise runs contain pea gravel. Tom Rulon ask d what was used to enclose 920450 V LLD COU 1TY BEFORE THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, PLANNING COMMISSION 1^92 1Pf 24 An 9: In RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIQNEB.yS, [[..LL��ttttRR{{ A.�p Moved by Richard Kimmel that the following resolution be introduWdT�bx"9as'sage by the Weld County Planning Commission. Be it resolved by the Weld County Planning Commission that the application for: CASE NUMBER: Z-466 NAME: Jack E. and Marjorie J. Edson c/o Jake Edson ADDRESS: 11623 Quivas Circle Westminster, CO 80234 REQUEST: A Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) to P.U.D. (I-1 and C-3 uses) . LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NW4 NW4 of Section 10, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado (Lot A of Recorded Exemption 103) . LOCATION: Approximately 2.5 miles east of the City of Longmont; east of Weld County Road 7, south of Highway 119. be recommended favorably to the Board of County Commissioners for the following reasons: 1. The submitted materials are in compliance with the application requirements of Section 28.5 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 2. The rezoning request is in conformance with Section 28.7 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: The proposed Planned Unit Development (P.U.D. ) District is located within the I-25 Mixed-Use Development (I-25 M.U.D. ) area. The uses associated with the proposed P.U.D. district are consistent with the uses described in the I-25 M.U.D. section of the Comprehensive Plan. The uses allowed in the proposed P.U.D. district will conform to the performance standards contained in Section 35.3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. The P.U.D. district will be served by the Left Hand Water District and the St. Vrain Sanitation District. Access to the proposed P.U.D. district will be provided from Weld County Road 7 in accordance with the memorandum, dated March 26, 1992, from Drew Scheltinga, County Engineer. 920450 gXNIIo11 Li RESOLUTION, Z-466, Page 3 Jack E. and Marjorie J. Edson, c/o Jake Edson - The property is located in the Flood Hazard Overlay District. No other overlay districts affect the site. The mining of existing commercial mineral deposits on the site has been determined to be economically unfeasible. These determinations are based, in part, upon a review of the application submitted by the applicant, other relevant information regarding the request, and responses from referral entities. The Planning Commission's recommendation for approval is conditional upon the following: 1. The Change of Zone plat shall be delivered to the Department of Planning Services and be ready for recording in the Weld County Clerk and Recorder's office within 15 days of approval by the Board of County Commissioners. 2. The following notes shall be placed on the P.U.D. District plat: Uses allowed within the P.U.D. district shall comply with uses allowed in the I-1 (Industrial) and C-3 (Commercial) districts of the Zoning Ordinance, except that the following uses are excluded from this P.U.D. District: retail outlets, convenience stores, restaurants, drive-ins, auto service stations, theaters, night clubs, taverns, car washes, and entertainment establishments. A site plan review is required in accordance with Section 35.4 of the Zoning Ordinance. All streets within the P.U.D. district are private and shall be built to County standards. All streets within the P.U.D. district shall be maintained by the owners of the P.U.D. district, unless other arrangements are approved by the Board of County Commissioners. Uses in the P.U.D. district involving outdoor storage of vehicles, equipment, or materials shall be screened from public rights-of-way and all adjacent properties. The maximum building height shall be 48 feet. The P.U.D. plan application shall include a stormwater management plan and a detailed master drainage plan for the P.U.D. district. All drainage plans submitted with a site plan review application shall comply with the approved P.U.D. plan stormwater management 92O plan. RESOLUTION, Z-466, Page 4 Jack E. and Marjorie J. Edson, c/o Jake Edson The P.U.D. plan application shall include a plan for signage which complies with the mixed use development policies of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. All plans for signage submitted with a site plan review application shall comply with the approved P.U.D. plan for signage. The property is located in the Flood Hazard Overlay District. All uses and structures shall comply with the Weld County Flood Hazard Overlay District requirements. The P.U.D. plan application and all site plan review applications shall comply with the requirements of the December 16, 1991, letter from Mark A. Lawley, Division Chief Prevention, Mountain View Fire Protection District. The P.U.D. plan application and all site plan review applications shall comply with the requirements of the December 18, 1991, letter from Evan A. Hooper, Jr. , Colorado Department of Transportation. No direct access shall be permitted to Highway 119. Sewer service shall be provided by the St. Vrain Sanitation District. Water service shall be provided by the Left Hand Water District. 3. Prior to recording the P.U.D. District plat: The six existing general notes on the P.U.D. District plat shall be removed. Motion seconded by Judy Yamaguchi. VOTE: For Passage Against Passage Richard Kimmel Jean Hoffman Tom Rulon Bill O'Hare Judy Yamaguchi Don Feldhaus Bud Clemons 320450 RESOLUTION, Z-466, Page 4 Jack E. and Marjorie J. Edson, c/o Jake Edson The Chairman declared the resolution passed and ordered that a certified copy be forwarded with the file of this case to the Board of County Commissioners for further proceedings. CERTIFICATION OF COPY I, Sharyn Ruff, Recording Secretary for the Weld County Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution, is a true copy of the Resolution of the Planning Commission of Weld County, Colorado, adopted on April 21, 1992. Dated the 22 f April, 992. — 4.11) Sharyn F. Ruff Secretary 20450 INVENTORY OF ITEMS SUBMITTED FOR CONSIDERATION Applicant: Jake Edson Case Number: Z-466 Submitted or Prepared Prior to Hearing At Hearing 1. Application 32 Pages X 2. 1 Application plat 1 page X 3. DPS Referral Summary Sheet X 4. DPS Recommendation X 5. DPS Surrounding Property Owner's Mailing List X 6. DPS Mineral Owner's Mailing List X 7. 3 DPS Maps Prepared by Planning Technician X 8. DPS Notice of Hearing X 9. DPS Case File Summary Sheet X 10. DPS Field Check X 11. P.U.D. District - Planning Commission Sign Posting Certificate X 12. March 16, 1992, letter from Colorado Geological Survey X 13. March 19, 1992, referral from City of Longmont X 14. December 23, 1991, referral from City of Longmont X 15. April 2, 1992, referral from Longmont Soil Conservation District X 16. March 31, 1992, referral from Oil and Gas Commission X 17. March 30, 1992, referral from Department of Transportation X 18. December 18, 1991, referral from Department of Transportation X 19. March 24, 1992, referral from Army Corps of Engineers X 20. March 26, 1992, referral from Weld County Health Department X 21. March 26, 1992, referral from Weld County Engineering X 22. March 24, 1992, referral from Panhandle Eastern Pipeline Company X 23. March 22, 1992, referral from Mountain View Fire Protection District X 24. Field check from Shirley Camenisch, Planning Commission member X 25. December 16, 1992, letter from Mountain View Fire Protection District X 26. December 26, 1991, letter from Army Corps of Engineers X 27. March 17, 1992, letter to applicant X CXN1r 1i A 920 INVENTORY OF ITEMS Jake Edson Z-466 I hereby certify that the 27 items identified herein were submitted to the Department of Planning Services at or prior to the scheduled Planning Commission hearing. I further certify that these items were forwarded to the Clerk to the Board's office on April 23, 1992. u ent Planr/ STATE OF COLORADO ) COUNTY OF WELD el SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS,52'1C day of _la.)l.4) 19�� 01.4 r . t Ji G' n NO Y PUBLIC L.\s; G "Commis�ston Expires E Or ^ cy fJeJ 920450 EXHIBIT INVENTORY CONTROL SHEF Case C.02 e,p5�N --‘5 tics z /r1 g-so tug-- "le J K 1 OSC14/ Exhibit Submitted By¢ n Exhibit� Description � (`{� a-vm-14.-vvId D• 'L .,2/v l� u� i� .Ls f L� 14:-)) c/a_ a_ E. /19 F. &0-1 1-D ?tL /5or-'J1. ,� G. ��6 H. '7„(J) anter.6-J I. J. K. L. M. N. O. P. Q. R. S. T. U. V. W. X. Y. Z• 450 CASE NUMBER: Z-466 Date: April 21, 1992 NAME: Jack E. and Marjorie J. Edson c/o Jake Edson ADDRESS: 11623 Quivas Circle Westminster, CO 80234 REQUEST: A Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) to P.U.D. (I-1 and C-3 uses) . LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NW4 NW4 of Section 10, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado (Lot A of Recorded Exemption 103) . LOCATION: Approximately 2.5 miles east of the City of Longmont; east of Weld County Road 7, south of Highway 119. The Department of Planning Services' staff recommends this request be approved for the following reasons: 1. The submitted materials are in compliance with the application requirements of Section 28.5 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 2. The rezoning request is in conformance with Section 28.7 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: The proposed Planned Unit Development (P.U.D. ) District is located within the I-25 Mixed-Use Development (I-25 M.U.D. ) area. The uses associated with the proposed P.U.D. district are consistent with the uses described in the I-25 M.U.D. section of the Comprehensive Plan. The uses allowed in the proposed P.U.D. district will conform to the performance standards contained in Section 35.3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. The P.U.D. district will be served by the Left Hand Water District and the St. Vrain Sanitation District. Access to the proposed P.U.D. district will be provided from Weld County Road 7 in accordance with the memorandum, dated March 26, 1992, from Drew Scheltinga, County Engineer. The property is located in the Flood Hazard Overlay District. No other overlay districts affect the site. The mining of existing commercial mineral deposits on the site has been determined to be economically unfeasible. These determinations are based, in part, upon a review of the application submitted by the applicant, other relevant information regarding the request, and responses from referral entities. 20450 RECOMMENDATION, Z-466 Jack E. and Marjorie J. Edson, c/o Jake Edson Page 2 The Department of Planning Services' staff recommendation for approval is conditional upon the following: 1. The Change of Zone plat shall be delivered to the Department of Planning Services and be ready for recording in the Weld County Clerk and Recorder's office within 15 days of approval by the Board of County Commissioners. 2. The following notes shall be placed on the P.U.D. District plat: Uses allowed within the P.U.D. district shall comply with uses allowed in the I-1 (Industrial) and C-3 (Commercial) districts of the Zoning Ordinance, except that the following uses are excluded from this P.U.D. District: retail outlets, convenience stores, restaurants, drive-ins, auto service stations, theaters, night clubs, taverns, car washes, and entertainment establishments. A site plan review is required in accordance with Section 35.4 of the Zoning Ordinance. All streets within the P.U.D. district are private and shall be built to County standards. All streets within the P.U.D. district shall be maintained by the owners of the P.U.D. district, unless other arrangements are approved by the Board of County Commissioners. Uses in the P.U.D. district involving outdoor storage of vehicles, equipment, or materials shall be screened from public rights-of-way and all adjacent properties. The maximum building height shall be 48 feet. The P.U.D. plan application shall include a stormwater management plan and a detailed master drainage plan for the P.U.D. district. All drainage plans submitted with a site plan review application shall comply with the approved P.U.D. plan stormwater management plan. The P.U.D. plan application shall include a plan for signage which complies with the mixed use development policies of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. All plans for signage submitted with a site plan review application shall comply with the approved P.U.D. plan for signage. The property is located in the Flood Hazard Overlay District. All uses and structures shall comply with the Weld County Flood Hazard Overlay District requirements. 920450 RECOMMENDATION, Z-466 Jack E. and Marjorie J. Edson, c/o Jake Edson Page 3 The P.U.D. plan application and all site plan review applications shall comply with the requirements of the December 16, 1991, letter from Mark A. Lawley, Division Chief Prevention, Mountain View Fire Protection District. The P.U.D. plan application and all site plan review applications shall comply with the requirements of the December 18, 1991, letter from Evan A. Hooper, Jr. , Colorado Department of Transportation. No direct access shall be permitted to Highway 119. Sewer service shall be provided by the St. Vrain Sanitation District. Water service shall be provided by the Left Hand Water District. 2. Prior to recording the P.U.D. District plat: The six existing general notes on the P.U.D. District plat shall be removed. 920450 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN - paat-iLct PLANNING COMMISSION SIGN POSTING CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER THE PENALTIES OF PERJURY THAT THE SIGN PROVIDED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES WAS POSTED ON THE PROPERTY AT LEAST TEN DAYS PRECEDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING FOR CASE S- Z-466 THE SIGN WAS POSTED BY: April 11, 1992 LaVern C. Nelson, P. E. Nelson Engineers NAME OF PERSON POSTING SIGN SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT LaVern C. Nelson, P. E. , Nelson STATE OF COLORADO ) Engineers, Agent for Jake Edson, SS Authorized Agent for Jack E. and COUNTY OF WELD ) Marjorie J. Edson SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS 10thDAY OF April 19 92. SEAL CeaU � _ NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES April 13, 1993 LAST DAY TO POST SIGN IS: April 11, 19 92 920450 LAND-USE APPLICATION SUMMARY SHEET Date: April 14, 1992 CASE NUMBER: Z-466 NAME: Jack E. and Marjorie J. Edson, c/o Jake Edson ADDRESS: 11623 Quivas Circle, Westminster, Colorado 80234 REQUEST: A Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) to P.U.D. (I-1 and C-3 uses) . LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NW4 NW4 of Section 10, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: Approximately 2.5 miles east of the City of Longmont; east of Weld County Road 7, south of Highway 119. PLANNING COMMISSION FUNCTION: To make a recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners consistent with the criteria listed in Section 28.7 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. The Department of Planning Services' staff has received recommendations from the following referral entities. 1. City of Longmont 2. Longmont Soil Conservation District 3. Colorado Oil and Gas Commission 4. Colorado Department of Transportation 5. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 6. Weld County Health Department 7. Weld County Engineering Department 8. Panhandle Eastern Pipeline Company 9. Mountain View Fire Protection District For your information, also included in this summary packet are referral letters which were received from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Mountain View Fire Protection District when the P.U.D. sketch plan was reviewed by the staff. No objections have been received from surrounding property owners. 920450 •x< an g °-'� M• a qY n lliI 7_ -1 16 ' i •�.' - i' _—ej c -J : g .. 33 7.. 33.1 • 34 M s• lal- • • / ntocax = / �; • .,` = l � • irk •• , 36 • °• N`,- • 5 I — F*"sue jx • `• ° :1 G4 - ' „• ]O ,,.,„,\,, • . I -0----- ---41mI l zx tl� xx ,E. I 36 ro der °sa•r -0 • s •.r .a}s °2 ❑ °;.so �l lI r r0• • �' xx dq L*I no Ir x• J xf •1• . ti �n.� v 2,# xa • -• =s I 28 £ L" . ;'" ks • 1 ti , , . :O .a .• • _/ N` n RFC r 1 q v o" ` ' ///� `"-y ` "�.�I IL \26 : • —•° • +i x • • . 4u 24 rotGrvaaro•r • ° r . ein O • 4L? " RR1i 'pro Is - • ,r: Cn . • 1 i .CtlW aillin voLLAs• , 20 •• a - --- .-: ul Ra N. • ry J y u 1 \ x E l w / e � If'. f r -V r : qa , Z , Kfl • p is . ' o�e. 1 4cva sror+ LI ` 0p r• ! SI • i)((<:15. ▪ • bas • ! / . e• Y t s u , , u �1 e, l s n •. °• 5-s-, • nt a 14 -- roszus,o :• > °Ns... ;: :� 4 1 �` •/�:0f .1 _ r 1,. *•:6371. NJ °▪ a .'E s. . '< <corr ... .. l r•.<,.r,tz� 1�;• • 1 ). r Y / 1• ._, / i • . ./. ... ICI 10 . .. . . o \` - ' ` 1• I / r° o y c�• �r ; ��Yo =um.t- 1 .,�p°°uR . / l.8 n/�• ,•j' .° two / • �� 1 � • 1, � qP^�.,_ r uou iii 20 6 � �.'..r•• .� Jbbt o "O I, — Y�: 1 q' �/ q�. . `V1 ' "s—� `�GFo l�J' ..js\`'`�+J11 ,1. k r zr T za ;• - ° so c • Q1�s• •1 =• II e°�l {••. 3 •'• • O4 m ° } • � Is 33 2 . ::c::"'_; s- raa 'p" ,:. dBASE ) • r • F IIl .. l•' X 3 9 —' I ,Y! N 1) 1 q 1Nt Oj ll�+41 tticeij ,',It A DAM p'+Se x . \,..._.\--„,,,......._____, 1 34 --"— —r r 498°✓ a - l 1 :,)L.-\, \ '�s� c` 2-\4:,_! , Poo oo X4827 SI k9 -PC) AY f Ai CHANCE J �11 --Mr-7 11 X50 m i G9 St __. 4e26 , _ �� 14832 -.. i C'. SacC �� _22�� 4 • 3 2 eJ4 ��( 48431 b 4o 1---- V I I _A '(avel Pit OitCM \ I � �l 1 V °a4o-I 1 1 B1 ® 48431 a 48'Well •�_ •_ _... I Y Y mo �P + �o T Z., 1 ��4e5o� C3- .t C •...) - . Oi� 1 re 9h i 4856 - = 10 I. 1'111 — 12 \ v t _ I CI Y� 560 f �� ( '°off b s � ° ° ` ( ' it _ - �/ 'V t )� 1 i' i "----„,� 1171 ✓ —\ Ri nZxlle Ci i 6 a. A 492 w 4- cc o Ar/( ( -- , i� �lume / / 1 ( // .Ri ? , nn �� 161•. . 0 15 7 , 1 1_ .._:___, ,, , „ i___,„ _, , f „I U/ _, \..., _Tho \, ili \i c) , o �I ('-'7r--- •o / _\ \ 'y o -. 488 c _ BMI �--�. —��- � �_"_c_ - 925 e .oN ` • a.� ,, y (7---'. " 71 LI <ee� 4882 \I ' liI'� rY \ I I o \� Jl u,gyp 3. l �p 1, - 3: 9" �.— 1 r � all� BCh l U; �\ \ 2 /7- 24 -- 777;�Q '22„...------- u R t 44 q :: • - . — — 6. } r°tom • r.•. h 3: ==..-.: D�q' � 46, ;x:. .: di,,..,, kw C"Y:.- wee ,d1:0/2 Clit ,. a:L �, I :z. ,. _ r f,3.,r�, ,.,M,',..1."��, Y°i+.ktSg ;�.'" i .,his: , ('. 4,, ^\ 'iiid::Y :.,;;;:l...... �' .;is- ,N0- - `...,a= "1 moo 2..s .,7',,';'.',-„c , li, 'u ear:' • • - , - x r [ := i .a: - a .O,27at L) , .- .trr • • D�JJrj. ,: i}i t f I Si: 5.+4. : GAD • x F, y itTtr • i • •nto••1 ,rs i `;F 't4.F fti.i ;{{�rl sL.i�'P.r,..}f P -ter' /�i K 1 . FIELD CHECK FILING NUMBER: Z-466 DATE OF INSPECTION: April 6, 1992 APPLICANT'S NAME: Jack E. and Marjorie J. Edson, c/o Jake Edson REQUEST: A Change of Zone from Agricultural to P.U.D. (I-1 and C-3 uses) . LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NW4 NW4 of Section 10, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado (Lot A of RE-103) . LOCATION: East of Weld County Road 7, south of Highway 119. LAND USE: N Highway 119, Custom Fence, Valley Hayloft. E Agricultural vacant land. S Rural residences. W Weld County Road 7, farmground. ZONING: N C-3 and C-4 (Commercial) E A (Agricultural) S A (Agricultural) W A (Agricultural) COMMENTS: One access currently exists to this property from Weld County Road 7. The property is relatively flat, is in the floodplain, and is used for grazing. The property is fenced with a barbed-wire fence. The properties east and southeast of this property have been previously permitted for sand and gravel mining. The property northwest of this property is currently being mined. u rent P a er REFERRAL LIST NAME: Jack E. and Marjorie J. Edson, c/o Jake Edson CASE NUMBER: Z-466 REFERRALS SENT: March 17, 1992 REFERRALS TO BE RECEIVED BY: March 31, 1992 COUNTY TOWNS and CITIES Attorney _Ault X Health Department _Brighton _Extension Service _Broomfield _Emergency Management Office _Dacono Sheriff' s Office _Eaton X Engineering _Erie _Housing Authority _Evans _Airport Authority ____Firestone Building Inspection _Fort Lupton ____Frederick STATE _Garden City Division of Water Resources _ _ Gilcrest Geological Survey ____Greeley _Department of Health Grover X Highway Department Hudson Historical Society Johnstown _ Water Conservation Board Keenesburg X Oil and Gas Conservation Commission Kersey La Salle FIRE DISTRICTS Lochbuie Ault F-1 X Longmont _ _Berthoud F-2 _Mead _Brighton F-3 _Milliken Eaton F-4 New Raymer _ _Fort Lupton F-5 _Northglenn Galeton F-6 Nunn _Hudson F-7 _Platteville _Johnstown F-8 _Severance La Salle F-9 Thornton _ —R--Mountain View F-10 Windsor Milliken F-11 _ Nunn F-12 COUNTIES _ _Pawnee F-22 Adams _Platteville F-13 Boulder Platte Valley F-14 ____Larimer Poudre Valley F-15 Raymer F-23 FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES Southeast Weld F-16 X US Army Corps of Engineers _ Windsor/Severance_ F-17 ____USDA-APHIS Veterinary Service Wiggins F-18 _Federal Aviation Administration Western Hills F-20 Federal Communication Commission OTHER SOIL CONSERVATION DISTRICTS Central Colo. Water Conservancy Dist. _Brighton _ X Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. Fort Collins Tri-Area Planning Commission ____Greeley X Longmont West Adams COMMISSION/BOARD MEMBER X Shirley Camenisch 97;0450 �ccsi LOA/a. 1) 1.-a DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DIVISION Civic Center Complex / Longmont, CO 80501 L OR ) (303) 651-8330 MAR 2 3 1992 March 19, 1992 Weld Wei4 ,Plasnip9 Ms. Lanell J. Swanson, Current Planner Weld County Department of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 RE: CASE NUMBER: Z-466 Dear Lanell: Thank you very much for sending the Edson PUD change of zone application to the City of Longmont for our review and comment. The proposed PUD includes 35 acres± located at the southeast corner of SH119 and WCR7. The applicant intends to have a mixed use commercial and industrial development with outdoor storage. The City of Longmont previously commented upon the sketch plan for this proposed PUD, and I have attached a copy of those comments which discuss several concerns, e.g., transportation access, location and screening of outdoor storage, landscaping, signage. The information the applicant has submitted with the change of zone application does not provide sufficient detail for the City to determine to what extent the applicant addresses our concerns. The change of zone application materials indicate that the applicant will provide detailed information as part of the PUD final plan application: the next stage of Weld County's PUD process. Therefore, the City's previous comments remain, and we look forward to reviewing the detailed information, particularly the private covenants, which should be part of the PUD final plan application. Thank you again for the opportunity to comment on this change of zone request. If you have any questions, please call either Froda Greenberg or me at 651-8330. Sincerely, IL 0 Se jea Brad Schol Planning Director xc: Phil DelVecchio, Community Development Director File: #2050-10j1 920450 fltO4ro. tit lititacct DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DIVISION OW. �O Civic Center Complex / Longmont, CO 80501 L OR Qs (303) 651-8330 December 23, 1991 Mr. Rod Allison Principal Planner Weld County Department of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 RE: CASE NUMBER: S-318 Dear Rod: Thank you very much for sending the Edson PUD sketch plan to the City of Longmont for our review and comment. The proposed PUD includes 35 acres± located at the southeast corner of SH119 and WCR7. The applicant intends to have a mixed use commercial and light industrial development located in an area that the conceptual land use plan for the I-25 Mixed Use Development Area designates as "office." My understanding is that the Department of Planning Services considers that these proposed land uses are consistent with the office land use designation. With the view of preserving the functional integrity of the adjacent road system, we question the need and desirability for multiple access points to both SH119 and WCR7. The City assumes that the Weld County Engineering Department and the Colorado Department of Transportation will review whether one access point to WCR7 will provide adequate access. We also assume that the covenants and/or plan documents will require access to the lots be taken directly from the private street. The City looks forward in the future to reviewing the covenants and architectural controls which will control the open space, landscaping, architecture, and signage. The applicant may want to consider providing some amenities to Outlot A so that it could be integrated into activities in the development and used by employees and customers, e.g, picnic tables, benches. 9204M The application states that there is going to be outdoor storage. We suggest that its location be delineated on the plan at the appropriate stage of the PUD process, and that Weld County consider limiting it to lots that neither front SH119 or WCR7. We also respectfully request that Weld County consider requiring screening (whether landscaping, fencing, berming, or a combination) along SH119 that is more effective at screening outdoor storage than we recently have seen used elsewhere along SH119. Thank you again for the opportunity to comment on this sketch plan. If you have any questions, please call either Froda Greenberg, or me at 651-8330. Sincerely, Brad Schol Planning Director xc: Phil DelVecchio, Community Development Director - File: #2050-10J 350 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE(303)358-4000,EXT.4400 915 10th STREET viive. ; 631 1992 COLORADO Weld County Planning March 17 , 1992 CASE NUMBER: Z-466 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from Jack E. and Marjorie Edson, c/o Jake Edson for a Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) to P.U.D. (I-1 and C-3 uses) . The parcel of land is described as part of the NW4 NW4 of Section 10, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado (Lot A of RE-103) . The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is approximately 2.5 miles east of the City of Longmont; east of Weld County Road 7, south of Highway 119. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by March 31, 1992, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Lanell J. Swanson, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: 3. X We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Signed: 4,, ,j , acwm-lar ,y Agency: Longmont Soil Conservation District Date: April 2, 19992 92O450 • �ti J ] � I, `VrTh ` EPARTM ENT OF PLANNING SERVICES - l PHONE(303)356-4000,EXT.4400 ;1} 91510th STREET ' APR 19 92 ,,1 GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 vi rt C° R Co COLORADO Q 1 % March 17 , 1992 N3.°\�&GaSCNS COMM CASE NUMBER: Z-466 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN. Enclosed is an application from Jack E. and Marjorie Edson, c/o Jake Edson for a Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) to P.U.D. (I-1 and C-3 uses) . The parcel of land is described as part of the NW4 NW4 of Section 10, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado (Lot A of RE-103) . The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is approximately 2.5 miles east of the City of Longmont; east of Weld County Road 7 , south of Highway 119. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by March 31, 1992, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Lanell J. Swanson, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons . 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: 3. We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests . 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Please refer to the enclosed letter. � //�� Signed: ( A' Agency: 04 d � aryInAfJ`%a/7 Date: L9 5/ s� :92Q STATE OF COLORADO .....,,, DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS t V P.O. Box 800 n` Greeley, Colorado 80632-0850 V oA a (303) 353-1232 'For '41 Weld Co. , S.H. 119 Edson Zone Change S.E. Corner S.H. 119 and Co. Rd. 7 March 30, 1992 II . yMAR 1992 , Ms. Lanell Swanson, Planner U ��-- — — •J Department of Planningkftif y Weld County 915 Tenth Street Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Ms. Swanson: We have reviewed the Edson application for Zone Change, and we refer you to our letter of December 18, 1991 for our comments regarding this planned development. A copy of the letter is attached. Thank you for the opportunity to review this proposal . Please contact me at 350-2163 id you have any questions. Very truly yours, &VW', Evan A. Hooper, r. Development/Access Coordinator EAH/cm Attachment cc: L. D. Yost M. D. Fanning File 920450 STATE OF COLORADO DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS ,4EMt Oc FE P.O. Box 850 ,3,40`1.7 , ,az Greeley, Colorado 80632-0850 (303) 353-1232 Weld Co. , S.H. 119 Edson P.U.D. S.E. Corner S.H. 119 December 18, 1991 and Co. Rd. 7 Planning Department Weld County 915 Tenth Street Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Planner: We have reviewed the application for the Edson P.U.D. and we have the following comments: Direct access to State Highway 119 from this development will not be allowed. The highway has been designated as a "Category 2" highway in this area. According to the State Highway Access Code, "Private direct access shall not be permitted except when the property in question has no other reasonable access to the general street system." The development, as proposed, obviously has reasonable access to County Road 7. Further, the Code specifies that "No additional access shall be provided upon the splitting or dividing of existing parcels or contiguous parcels under the same ownership or control . All access to the newly created properties shall be provided internally from the existing access or a new access determined by the permit application or subdivision procedures and be consistent with the requirements of this code." Those Lots with frontage on the state highway that are created by the P.U.D. will not be allowed direct access to the highway at any time in the. future. While the P.U.D. Sketch Plan Map indicates Outlet "A" as a Detention Pond area, the developer must be reminded that the state highway drainage system is for the protection of the state highway right of way. That drainage system is not intended to accommodate drainage from abutting properties beyond that which has historically been accepted. Therefore, the on site detention of surface runoff must be provided so that the historical runoff rate will not be exceeded due to the development. Any landscaping within the highway as a result of the development must be maintained by the adjacent private property owner and must not impair sight distance at any highway access, must not present a safety hazard, and must not unreasonably conflict with future highway expansion. New trees are normally not permitted since they can be difficult to relocate. Planning Departmen,l Weld County December 18, 1991 Page 2 Buildings on those Lots with highway frontage will be subject to traffic noise that could exceed the standard residential or commercial design noise level . To minimize this potential adverse impact, we recommend that the buildings be located as far away from the highway as possible. Noise insulation of the walls and double glazing on the windows exposed to the highway should also be provided. If no measures are taken to mitigate traffic noise impact, these properties may not qualify for a state funded noise abatement project, if funds for such a project at this location were to become available. Thank you for the opportunity to review this proposal . Please contact me at 350-2163 if you have any questions. Very truly yours, ,C22t / CC /61 Evan A. Hoope , Jr. Development/Access Coordinator EAH/cm cc: L. D. Yost M. D. Fanning S9 4So 6/ (17111 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE(303)3584000,EXT.4400 r 91510th STREET Be �, GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 en COLORADO ° u r piA MAR 2 / 1992 1 March 17 , 1992 CASE NUMBER: Z- TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Weld County Punning Enclosed is an application from Jack E. and Marjorie Edson, c/o Jake Edson for a Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) to P.U.D. (I-1 and C-3 uses) . The parcel of land is described as part of the NW4 NW4 of Section 10, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado (Lot A of RE-103) . The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is approximately 2.5 miles east of the City of Longmont; east of Weld County Road 7 , south of Highway 119. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by March 31, 1992, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Lanell J. Swanson, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: 3. X We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Signed( �-�'`^� e ,rk_. Agency: Cms.-�S Er�.ricetS Date: m�A 4\ 0441,.. mEmoRAnDun m WIDCTo Weld County Planning Date March 26, 1992 COLORADO s John Pickle, Director, Environmental Protection Service From Case Number: Z-466 Name: Edson, Jack E. & Marjorie Subject: Environmental Protection Services has reviewed this proposal; the following conditions are recommended to be part of any approval: 1. All units within this referenced property must utilize the available approved sanitary sewer system. 2. All units within this referenced property must utilize the available, approved public water supply system. JP/lam-E560 1py�y y 0 JILn clijr VJt17 \ MAR 2 L'19922 U Weld County Planning 92O45O MEMORAnDU Nipa To Lanell Swanson, Planning Date Marche COLORADO From Drew Scheltinga, County Engineer subject: Edson PUD, Z-466 The applicant indicates Weld County Road 7 will be analyzed at the time the planned unit development is applied for. I have no objection, but would like to point out some issues discussed at the sketch plan stage. I expect improvements on Road 7 will be necessary because of the truck traffic that will be generated by the zone change to I-1 and C-3 uses. I recommend one entrance be allowed off Weld County Road 7. Also, at the PUD stage, an additional 20' of right-of-way (for a total of 50' east of the section line) be dedicated. MAR 2 6 1992 VcldCc-- 1 p11 DS/mw:predson.mrw cc: Commissioner Webster Planning Referral File - Edson PUD, Z-466 32045 • 4 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE(303)35&4000,EXT.4400 yyy��i 1 y10th STREET 3 ty q 631 II ik MAR 2 G 1992 COLORADO Weld County Planning March 17, 1992 CASE NUMBER: Z-466 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from Jack E. and Marjorie Edson, c/o Jake Edson for a Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) to P.U.D. (I-1 and C-3 uses) . The parcel of land is described as part of the NW4 NW4 of Section 10, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado (Lot A of RE-103) . The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is approximately 2.5 miles east of the City of Longmont; east of Weld County Road 7, south of Highway 119. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by March 31, 1992, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Lanell J . Swanson, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: 3 . X We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Signed: � .��i Agency: Panhandle Eastern Pipe Tine rn_ Date: s. - 920450 • 11 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE(303)356-4000,EXT.4400 91510th STREET 11 "live MAR 2 a 1992 COLORADO Weld County Planning March 17 , 1992 CASE NUMBER: Z-466 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from Jack E. and Marjorie Edson. c/o Jake Edson for a Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) to P.U.D. (I-1 and C-3 uses) . The parcel of land is described as part of the NW4 NW4 of Section 10, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado (Lot A of RE-103) . The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is approximately 2.5 miles east of the City of Longmont; east of Weld County Road 7, south of Highway 119. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by March 31, 1992, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Lanell J. Swanson, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: 3. We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Please refer the enclosed letter. Signed: 0Oct/ i��Q// Agency///(lf.W 4X /ZI 1 �7/),JDate: , =ZZ.-gL 920450 FIELD CHECK FILING NUMBER: Z-466 DATE OF INSPECTION: V7-!/9 2 APPLICANT'S NAME: Jack E. and Majorie J. Edson, c/o Jake Edson 111 CURRENT PLANNER: Lanell J. Swanson REQUEST: A Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) to PUD (I-1 and C-3 uses) . LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NW4 NW4 of Section 10, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: Approximately 2.5 miles east of the City of Longmont; east of Weld County Road 7, south of Highway 119. � '" LAND USE: N f-241 Ce o�c� arttt-e .i,__o E U�P 9i2 f u-eC 00 ,LLB S UCit?- C ,a <t7 , -4 .(x% a . ZONING: N A (Agricultural) C-3 and C-4 (Commercial) O - L7..ci E A (Agricultural) MAR 2 4 1992 S A (Agricultural) ( - W A (Agricultural) Weld County Planning C NTS: ' -o (14(', ,vk%q 61 -yr ,0911-.( Lo ai„ael.¢4 42_4 o Win"), al -r -; A 0 tam'Inc�o�v �Q� Q IxJ 1 pcp U MIL ZIP Z.: .w . 't3 ( ,1.Q aN c-W,°A A,Lo.e.weec Le.4,1e t41_,,,, j,,,4--A),,,,42,44,1,,,d, �J Q � / atL 0� 1 N(Afr,„7",.., A - 4 -,-o, /4N 6222.. . It .it,�e ar Cte-� �CAA-, --Li e-Le -ztir-c `i-ert „gym cam. a_ C rr e rwvt' ,,,,,e4 s.,- ox w c27.sZ`ft-04,-4 1/l�/,/,�� 11� �] /3I Sc�'�ea-/clai✓yyz.ettj /6,10r _urcuP�.cwe cl $. c/l'sy� {'i. �j ,-+t-e- 4209 -nr�rttw dat c (�-th co-a% ..-eit-VYtn't ✓91,-A-,L x1-WHi_e t.._ '�l CA -6'ZJ/Lek--1: "CQT 'D pu.��l MOUNTAIN VIEW FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT f�� 700 Weaver Park Road, Longmont, CO 80501 (303) 772-0710 Metro(303) 666-4404 December 16, 1991 Weld County Department of Planning 915 Tenth Street Greeley,Co 80631 RE: Jack Edson PUD Dear Mr. Allison: The Mountain View Fire Protection District has reviewed the sketch plan for the Edson PUD and has no conflicts provided the following is done: 1.Fire hydrants be placed as noted on the site plan. 2. A required fire flow of 1,500 gpm with a residual pressure of 20psi be provided from each hydrant. 3. All roads must be a minimum of 20'unobstructed and be capable of supporting the imposed loads of fire apparatus(60,0001bs). Roads also must be constructed with an all weather driving surface. 4. MI buildings will have to meet all the requirements of the Uniform Fire Code,which could possibly include additional water, fire hydrants and fire sprinkler systems.This will depend on the construction type and hazards of the buildings. 5. The Mountain View Fire Protection District has adopted a plans review and inspection fee. The entire fee for the infrastructure of the PUD is payable at the start of construction of the first structure of the PUD. The fee for the review completed so far is$200.00, which will be credited to the full fee at the time it is paid.The$200.00 fee is not refundable whether the project continues or not. I have included a copy of Resolution 9 t-2 which includes the fee schedule. In calculating the amount due for the entire project, the cost of waterlines,hydrants and streets should be included. The cost of land and architect's fees are not included. If you have any questions or comments,please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, / / _ . L /f . Mark A.Lawley Division Chief Prevention 920450 • DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY M CORPS OF ENGINEERS,OMAHA DISTRICT TRI-LAKES PROJECT OFFICE,93O7 STATE HWY 121 p'^ u;.. LITTLETON,COLORADO 8O123-69O1 n ritiu REPLY TO ATTENTION OF December 26, 1991 Denver Regulatory Office Department of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Gentlemen: Reference is made to Case Number S-318, Jack Edson PUD located in Sec 10, T-2-N, R-68-W, Weld County, Colorado and to a December 23 , 1991 site visit conducted by Mr. Terry McKee of the Denver Regulatory office. During Mr. McKee's site visit, it was found that no wetlands exist at this site. This letter is to inform you that the proposed activity will not require a Department of the Army (DA) Permit. Although a DA Permit will not be required for the project, this does not eliminate the requirement that other applicable federal, state, and local permits be obtained as required. If there are any further questions concerning this matter, please feel free to contact Mr. Terry McKee of this office at 303- 979-4120 or 4121. Sincerely, TIMO HY T. ARE Projec Manager TTC: ld k)1 \\I -JAN n 1992 ty plenoitv^ tfdald COI; 920450 J. • • STATE OF COLORADO ) • Ices. COUNTY OF WELD ) David S. Reynolds, being duly sworn, says that he is publisher of The New News, a weekly newspaper published in Keenesburg in said County and State; that said newspaper has a general circulation in said County and has been continously and uninterruptedly - published therein, • during a period of at least 'fifty-two consecutive weeks prior to the first publication of the annexed notice; that said newspaper is a newspaper within the meaning of the act of the General Assembly of the State of Colorado,, entitled "An Act to regulate the printing of legal kuING notices and advertisements, " and ncs CF PUNIC HEAR amendments thereto; that the notice The Weld awob Par bearing en pu� Canoimial f will conduct 13ah at 1:30 n to Il co which the annexed is a printed ,a for d a reviewcopy taken from said newspaper, was p�u¢e d r� " d� t mil'The spice published in said newspaper, and in NN4 NW4 d secdm 3Train c the regular and entire issue of gth FM. WaM nn"a 'lbe every number thereof , �ssstocated a madr z. d the d Im�wd. dstatekLwgtnen lC�atc 'A"SaWI�of once a week for 1 • The pbhc naming era d the above successive weeks; that said notice t ��1 -glue cadudod'" wall so �dW�R Com Convnisa[onets published in said newspaper caaa c,m.�afer°°,iiconT proper and not in any supplement fey, cdQa�. awe thereof , and that the first b �muhaamwa publication of said notice as ��" eldt aforesaid, was on the bdueibe above daleovA;rn la 2O932. �/y� d tle hen are oat .L day of in I '1 &LcA -, 19 , tadyr�n the om Drew susgiallIma and the last on the 19 day of •' t3en chtmtmmesom aa Awl vitettn9 A9Yrd i+the Nees News Ment 19, Subscribed and swor Ct before mw this 'Vday of >11c-.r4 19..Z.La MAR 2 % 1992 ,} .�G'erGsr/x _..�._. • Weld County Planning My Commission Expires March 15, 19%• 920450 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING I hereby certify that I have placed a true and correct copy of the surrounding property owners and owners and lessees of minerals in accordance with the notification requirements of Weld County in Case Number Z-466 for Jack E. and Marjorie J. Edson, c/o Jake Edson in the United States Mail, postage prepaid First Class Mail by letter as addressed on the attached list. this 18th day of March, 1992. 92045 • /1 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE(303)358-4000,EXT.4400 91510th STREET ' GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 COLORADO TO: SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS CASE NUMBER: Z-466 There will be a Public Hearing before the Weld County Planning Commission on Tuesday, April 21, 1992, at 1:30 p.m. , in the County Commissioners' Hearing Room, First Floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado concerning the request of: NAME: Jack E. and Majorie J. Edson, c/o Jake Edson FOR: A Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) to PUD (I-1 and C-3) . LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NW4 NW4 of Section 10, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: Approximately 2.5 miles east of the City of Longmont; east of Weld County Road 7, south of Highway 119. Your property is within five-hundred (500) feet of the property on which this request has been made. For additional information write or telephone Lanell J. Swanson, Current Planner. 9204540 SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS AND/OR SUBSURFACE ESTATES/MINERAL OWNERS JACK E. AND MARJORIE J. EDSON, C/O JAKE EDSON Z-466 Amoco Production Company 1670 Broadway Denver, CO 80217 Randall S. and Alicia Lofquist 1115 Princeton Drive Longmont, CO 80501 Shirley Jean Boyd, Gerald Wayne Moore Elmer Moore, Trustees 3101 Highway 119 Longmont, CO 80501 The Rademacher Family Partnership, Ltd. 3525 Highway 119 Longmont, CO 80501 JCK Gravel, Inc. c/o Katherine Oliver 4465 Pioneer Drive Greeley, CO 80634 Mountain Empire Dairymen' s Assoc. , Inc. P.O. Box 2730 Salt Lake City, UT 84110 Edward E. Hodges aka, Ernest Edwards and Eleanor Hodges 10759 Weld County Road 7 Longmont, CO 80504 Rosie Heaton 2702 Highway 119 Longmont, CO 80501 St. Vrain Ltd, c/o Richard Domenicio 8200 West 67 Arvada, CO 80004 William L. and shirley J. Silvers 10608 Weld County Road 7 Longmont, CO 80501 920450 SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS AND/OR SUBSURFACE ESTATES/MINERAL OWNERS JACK E. AND MARJORIE J. EDSON, C/O JAKE EDSON Page 2 Jack E. and Marjorie J. Edson 1482 Leisure World Meza, AZ 85206 Dorothy E. Larson 10706 Weld County Road 7 Longmont, CO 80501 NAMES OF INTEREST OWNERS MINERALS AND/OR SUBSURFACE ESTATE Amoco Production Company 1670 Broadway Denver, Colorado 80217 920450 PANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS SURFACE ESTATE NW-1/4, NW-1/4, SEC.10, T2N, R68W, 6TH P.M. , WELD Legal Description: COUNTY, COLORADO STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS COUNTY OF WELD ) THE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn, states that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names, addresses, and the corresponding Parcel Identification Number assigned by the Weld County Assessor of the owners' of property (the surface estate) within five hundred feet of the property under consideration. This list was compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor, or an ownership update from a title or abstract company or attorney, derived from such records, or from the records of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. The list compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor shall have been assembled within thirty days of the application's submission date. (21,44-,--H7/21-1-1-9 The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn tobefore me this 26th day February , 19 92. WITNESS my hand and official seal. otary Public My Commission Expires: April 13, 1993 (((/// 920450 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS MINERALS AND/OR SUBSURFACE ESTATE Legal Description: NW-1/4, NW-1/4, SEC.10, T2N, R68W, 6TH P.M. , WELD COUNTY, COLORADO STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS COUNTY OF WELD THE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn, states that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names and addresses of all mineral owners and lessees of mineral owners on or under the parcel of land under consideration as their names appear upon the records in the Weld County Clerk and Recorder's Office or from an ownership update from a title or abstract company or an attorney. Let- The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me this 26th day of February , 1992 WITNESS my hand and official seal. ?/12dd , l /J�Ja/h) Notary Pub 4.1. My Commission Expires: April 13, 1993 920450 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN NAMES OF OWNERS OF PROPERTY WITHIN 500 FEET Please print or type ADDRESS , TOWN/CITY, ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NAME STATE AND ZIP CODE IDENTIFICATION f 11-1=1"7":77-----------1.115 andall S. & 115 Princeton Drive Longmont, CO 80501 1313-03-000-010 Alicia Lofguist .iIUI Highway 119 bhirtey Jean Boyd, Trustees Gerald Wayne 1313-03-000-011 Moore, �Uner yC1nrP Longmont, CO 80501 _. the Kademacher Family 3525 Highway 119 1313-03-000-046 Partnership Ltd. Longmont, CO 80501 JCK Gravel Inc. 4465 Pioneer Drive _ c/o Katherine Oliver. Greeley-- CO 89634 1313-nL_nQn_oAi Mountain Empire Dairymen's P. 0. Box 2730 1313-10-000-063 Association Inc. dward E. Hodges aka 10759 WCR 7 1313-09-090-067 --" Ernest Edward and Eleanor H.dgis LonSmnar, Ofl ASS 2702 Highway 119 Rosie Heaton Longmont, CO 80501 1313-09-000-068 — St. Vrain Ltd. 8200 West 67 Arvada, CO 80004 1113-0q-n01-069c/o Richard Domenicio William L. Silvers 10608 WCR 7 1313-10-000 Q78 Shirley J. Silvers Longmont, CO 80501 Jack E. Edson 1482 Leisure World Marjorie J. Edson Meza, t$ 85206 1313-10-000-087 10706 WCR 7 Dorothy E. Larson Longmont, CO 80501 l 3]3-]fl-Dflfl-nRR 920450 ((it_%Ft DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE(303)358-4000,EXT.4400 915 10th STREET GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 COLORADO March 17 , 1992 Jake Edson 11623 Quivas Circle Westminister, CO 80234 Subject: Z-466 - Request for a Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) to PUD (I-1 and C-3 uses) on a parcel of land described as part of the NW4 NW4 of Section 10, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. Dear Mr. Edson: Your application and related materials for the request described above are complete and in order at the present time. I have scheduled a meeting with the Weld County Planning Commission for April 21, 1992, at 1:30 p.m. This meeting will take place in the County Commissioners' Hearing Room, first floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado. It is recommended that you and/or a representative be in attendance to answer any questions the Planning Commission members might have with respect to your application. It is the policy of Weld County to refer an application of this nature to any town or municipality lying within three miles of the property in question or if the property under consideration is located within the comprehensive planning area of a town or municipality. Therefore, our office has forwarded a copy of the submitted materials to the City of Longmont Planning Commission for its review and comments. Please call Brad Schol at 651-8330 for further details regarding the date, time, and place of this meeting. It is recommended that you and/or a representative be in attendance at the Longmont Planning Commission Meeting to answer any questions the Commission members may have with respect to your application. It is the responsibility of an applicant to see that a sign is posted on the property under consideration at least 10 days preceding the hearing date. Sometime prior to April 7 , 1992, you or a representative should call me to obtain a sign to be posted on the site no later than April 11, 1992. The sign shall be posted adjacent to and visible from a publicly maintained road right-of-way. In the event the property under consideration is not adjacent to a publicly maintained road right-of-way, the applicant shall post one sign in the most prominent place on the property and post a second sign at the point at which the driveway (access drive) intersects a publicly maintained road right-of-way. Your sign posting certificate must be returned to the Department of Planning Services' office on or before the date of the hearing. 920450 Jake Edson, Z-466 March 17 , 1992 Page 2 The Department of Planning Services' staff will make a recommendation concerning this application to the Weld County Planning Commission. This recommendation will be available twenty-four (24) hours before the scheduled hearing. It is the responsibility of the applicant to call the Department of Planning Services' office before the Planning Commission hearing to make arrangements to obtain the recommendation. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to call me. Respectfully, ,1O-^e-WCA Let- r Lanell J. Sbaanson Current Planner LJS/sfr pc: Art Uhrich Nelson Engineers Greeley National Plaza 822 7th Street Greeley, CO 80631 920450 COLORADO DEPT OF NAT R TEL No .303-866-2115 Mar 16 ,92 12 : 10 No .011 P .02 g°e� �cc � � -� wp�oo\to �J N C RDV R.ROMER * // �}}j, * JOHN W,BOLD • GOVERNOR M . ,l.O1-•' ■ 0IRECI0N COLORADO GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 710 STAIt CENTENNIAL BUILDING - 1313 SHERMAN STREET DENVER,COLORADO 60203 PHONE(303)866.2811 March 16, 1992 2200 . Ms. Lanellc Swanson Weld County Department of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 8U631 Re: 1?dsoTl P. U. D./ Change of Zone • Dear Ms. Swanson: • After our discussion this morning about the case referenced above, we think that it will be most appropriate to defer our S.B. 35 0972) review of it until after the P. U. D. plans are developed. We therefore request that you submit the appropriate materials at that time. Silcerely, 1-cwL.,-- mes M. Soule Engineering Geologist • • GEOLOGY STORY OF THE PAST...KEY TO THE FUTURE . MAR 16 ' 92 11 : 13 303 866 2115 PAGE . 002 92045O COLORADO DEPT OF NAT R TEL No .303-866-2115 Mar 16 ,92 12 : 10 No .011 P .01 STAYC Or COLORADO ROY ROM- avernor Deelo$ieel Yo.rey DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Cord a `end Commlimner. Mined Lena Rnlemeelen Ken Salazar, Executive Director Dirlelen of Mines 1313 Sherman$t„Room 718.Denver,Colorado 80203 866.3311 on end Goo Cenervedon Comndrdon Olrbler of Park,&Outdoor doorwa<u Sall Conewvaden Board , r• r `�. Waar COMarvadon Sort Dlvlelon of Wear Rnewer • DWMen Of Wildlife EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S OFFI . - FACSIMILE TRANSMIT DATE in nee OG / RUN neeH /Co, l-l9) TO: Line/, I I p,/SnWcaS4Jn FAX # s.-s.-354A5 L.OQ ( AGENCY: &IliV l'lolj un0 ✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓izei✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓ ✓✓✓✓✓✓✓ S PROM: J/{'t'� U/& FAX# (303) 866-2115 TELEPHONE # f %A4 /1/ PAGES TRANSMIII_D,INCLUDING THIS COVER PAGE PRIORITY: /DELIVER IMMEDIATELY ADDRESSEE WILL PICK UP DELIVER WITHIN 4 HOURS NOTIFY ADDRESSEE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT REQUESTED YES_ NO ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS OR COMMENTS: SENDING OPERATOR MAR 16 ' 92 11 : 13 303 866 2115 PAGE . 001 920450 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION Department of Planning Services, 915 10th Street, Room 342, Greeley, Colorado PHONE: 356-4000 Ext. 4400 FOR PLANNING DEPARTMENT USE ONLY: CASE NO. APPLICATION FEE DATE RECEIVED RECEIPT NO. APPLICATION CHECKED BY RECORDING FEE -- RECEIPT NO. 'lU BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT: (Print or type only except for required signatures. ) — I (we) , the undersigned, hereby request hearings before the Weld County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners concerning the proposed PUD rezoning of the following described unincorporated area of Weld County, Colorado: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SEE ATTACHED -' (If additional space is required, attach an additional sheet) Property Address (if available) : ' PRESENT ZONE Ag PROPOSED ZONE PUD I-1 &C-3 TOTAL ACREAGE 15.0 - OVERLAY ZONES SURFACE FEE (PROPERTY OWNERS) OF AREA PROPOSED FOR PUD REZONING: NAME: Jack E. and Marjorie J. Edson HOME TELEPHONE: ADDRESS: 116z3 Quivas Circle Westminster, Colorado 80234 BUS, TELEPHONE: (303) 452-2675 NAME: HOME TELEPHONE: ADDRESS: BUS. TELEPHONE: APPLICANT OR AUTHORIZED AGENT (if different than above) : -- NAME: Jake Edson HOME TELEPHONE: ADDRESS: 11623 Quivas Circle Westminster_ ('nlnrado 80234 BUS. TELEPHONE: (303) 452-2675 - OWNER(S) AND/OR LESSEES OF MINERAL RIGHTS ON OR UNDER THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES OF RECORD IN THE WELD COUNTY ASSESSOR'S OFFICE: — NAME: Amoco Production Company ADDRESS: 16/0 Broadway, Denver, Colorado 80217 NAME: - ADDRESS: NAME: - ADDRESS: I hereby depose and state under the penalties of perjury that all statements, proposals, and plans submitted with or contained within this application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. COUNTY OF WELD ) 92O45O SS STATE OF COLORADO) Signature: Signa : Owner o Authorized Agent �y'� 1 ?a Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of /�[�1/'Cl�., 19 �:/�,Q,u Q zlt��NOTARY Pta C ' 920450 SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS EDSON P.U.D. MARCH, 1992 920450 SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS EDSON P.U.D. February, 1992 1. The PUD district application forms and application fee. The PUD District application forms and application fee of $800 are attached. 2. A statement describing the proposed PUD Concept, land-use(s) , and architectural style of the PUD. The 35 acre PUD will consist of C-3 (Commercial) and I-1 ( Industrial) uses as listed in the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. Edson PUD will be governed by private covenants, which will address architectural and design features of the development. Items such as, screening, open storage, landscape require- ments, maintenance, fencing and signs will be addressed in the convenants at the PUD final plan application stage. In general, the architectural style will provide for open space interspersed with conventional buildings using building materials mainly consisting of brick, wood, masonry and other appropriate materials tastefully designed to be compatible with the surroundings. Open storage can be located away from Open storage can be located away from Colorado Highway 119 and in rear of lot areas in order to utilize building screening as well as fencing and/or tree and shrubbery. Open storage will be tastefully designed to take advantage of the topography and natural environment. All outside storage areas shall be screened in accordance with Section 33.6.1. 9 of the Zoning Ordinance. It is the intent of the applicant to exclude certain uses which are high traffic generators to the site. Such uses as retail outlets, convenience stores , restaurants, drive-ins, auto service stations , theaters, night clubs , taverns, car washes , and entertainment establishments will be excluded as uses in the covenants as developed for the final PUD. 3 . A statement which demonstrates the proposed PUD rezoning is consistent with the policies of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. The proposed land uses are consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan designation for Planned Unit Developments . The site is in a Planned Unit Development Overlay District 92O45O known as the I-25 Mixed-Use Development Area and Activity Center. Uses allowed within the PUD are intended to fall within the Weld County Zoning classifications of C-3 and I-1. The Department of Planning Services considers that these pro- posed uses are consistent with the office land use designation as addressed in the Conceptual Land Use Plan for the I-25 Mixed use Development Area in the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. 4 . A statement which demonstrates how the USES allowed by the pro- posed PUD rezoning will be compatible within the PUD district. In addition, a detailed description of how any conflicts be- tween land uses within the PUD district are being avoided or mitigated and can comply with Section 35. 3 of the Weld County Zonning Ordinance. To insure compatibility of uses within the PUD, land uses that are compatible or alike will be located adjacent to one another. Therefore, no conflicts between land uses within the PUD are anticipated. Design standards will be established through architectural covenants and will specifically address the Performance Standards outlined in Section 35 . 3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. The uses allowed within the PUD will be limited to those allowed in the Weld County Zoning Ordinance for C-3 and I-1 uses and as described in Para- graph 2 . There are no known unique natural features on the proposed site, such as wildlife areas, wetlands, or vegetative cover. 5 . A statement which demonstrates how the USES allowed by the proposed PUD rezoning will be compatible with land uses surrounding the PUD district; in addition, a detailed des- cription of how any conflicts between land uses surrounding the PUD district are being avoided or mitigated. Surrounding land uses adjacent to the property are agriculture with a small amount of C-3 and C-4 zoning. Lands to the north- west, west, south, east and northeast are all zoned agriculture. Part of the site and some land adjacent to the south and east and northwest are designated SUP and USR for purposes of gravel mining, though some of the areas have not been mined due to negative economic conditions. Adjacent to the northwest corner on the site is a small tract of C-3 used for farm equip- ment supply and a small tract of C-4 used as lounge and restaurant. See vicinity map for specific locations . Compatibility with surrounding land uses will be ensured by the following: a. The proposed uses are consistent with the Comprehensive _ Plan designations with further limitations as described in paragraph 2. 920450 b. Architectural covenants will be established which provide for design standards to ensure a compatible development. c. Landscaping will be required in conjunction with the development. 6. A description of each use within the PUD. A description of all building, structures, and open storage areas, including size, floor area, and height. A description of the type of residential units within the PUD, including total number of units for each type. The PUD plan application will include detailed information and covenants regulating signage, outdoor storage, and land- scaping. Outdoor storage will be screened from Highway 119 and the balance of the PUD district as required by the Weld County Zoning Regulations . Open space area will be required with conventional buildings not exceeding 48 feet in height. No residential units are planned for this PUD. Covenants and architectural controls , which will be submitted later, will govern the quality of this development . Building materials will be compatible with the surroundings . Colors will tend toward the natural to blend into the local environ- ment. Signage will be limited to on-site, be unpretentious, and be developed in accord with site codes. The average density is 2. 9 acres per lot. 7 . A description of the size and type of any public and private open space and semi-public uses, including parks, recreation areas, school sites, fire and sheriff facilities, and similar uses. Private on-lot open space will be provided along Colorado Highway 119 and Weld County Road 7 . Sizes of open space will be dictated by actual uses described in the final PUD plan. No public or semi-public uses are anticipated. 8 . A description of the water source and system and a statement from the representative of the provider of the water system which demonstrates that the water supply quality and quantity is sufficient to meet the requirements of the uses within the PUD district. A PUD district with residential USES shall be served by a PUBLIC WATER system. Water service for the PUD will be provided by the Left Hand Water District (see attached statement) . The internal water system will be developed consistent with the Fire Protection District Regulations and approved by the Left Hand Water District. 9. A description of the sewage disposal facility. If the faci- lity is a sewer system, a statement from the representative 9 O of the provider of the sewer system utility which demonstrates that the sewer system will adequately serve the uses within the PUD district. _ Sanitary sewer service for the PUD will be provided by the St. Vrain Sanitation District ( see attached statement) . The collection system will be designed and installed consistent with the regulations of the District. 10 . A description of the functional classification, width, and structural capacity of the STREET and highway facilities which provide access to the PUD district. If the street or highway facilities providing access to the PUD district are not adequate to meet the requirements of the proposed district the applicant shall supply information which demonstrates the willingness and financial capability to upgrade the STREET or highway facilies in conformance with the Transporation Section of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. This shall be shown by submitting, with the Planned Unit Development District application, a separate off-site road improvements agreement describing the proposed road improvements and method of guaranteeing installation of said improvements in conformance with the Weld County Policy on Collateral for Improvements. The agreement shall be used for the purposes of review, evalua- tion, and compliance with this section. No rezoning shall be finally approved by the Board of County Commissioners until the applicant has submitted an improvements agreement or con- tract which sets forth the form of improvements and guarantees and is approved by the Board of County Commissioners. Weld County Road 7 , near its juncture with Colorado Highway _ 119 , will provide access to the site. Colorado Highway 119 is designed and constructed to state standards for the current and predicted uses and is functionally and structurally adequate for the proposed PUD as well. Weld County Road 7 is an asphalt paved roadway serving the neighborhood adequately. When the final PUD is developed and traffic patterns and impacts are determined, Weld County Road 7 will be analyzed through site specific traffic studies to determine whether or not it will be adequate or if new improvements are or will be needed. A separate off-site road agreement describing the improvements, method of installation , and the other appro- priate guarantees from the developer of the PUD will be developed all in conformance with the Weld County Policy on Collateral for Improvements. The actual design and specifications of the pavement for the internal roadways will be determined after an extensive soil study and testing of specific materials has been accomplished at the PUD Final Plan stage . S2O 11. A soil survey and study of the site proposed for the change of zone with a statement regarding suitability of soils to support all USES _allowed in the proposed zone. If the soils survey and study indicate soils which present moderate or sever limitations to the construction of STRUCTURES or faci- lities on the site, the applicant shall submit information which demonstrates that the limitations can be overcome. This information will be forwarded to the Colorado Geological Survey for evaluation. The soils within the PUD are made up of two general types as defined by the Soil Conservation Service soil survey of Weld County southern part. Aquolls and Aquepts Soils : deep, nearly level, poorly drained soil formed in alluvium deposits. Bankard Sandy Loam: deep, somewhat level, well drained, on flood plains, and formed alluvial deposits. The soil is stratified with thin lenses of sandy loam, loam, and fine gravel. This application is being accompanied by guideline excerpts from the published "Soils Survey of Weld County, Colorado, _ Southern Part" , developed by the United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Services (SCS) . That report reveals that the site has some limitations to construction due to localized flooding. This area remains relatively wet during the summer months due to poor drainage and a high water table. The soils show some restrictions that will have to be addres- sed by site specific soil testing and report by a certified soils engineer prior to development of each area of the final PUD. These restrictions can be mitigated through detailed subsurface soils investigations, application of appropriate drainage facilities, and strict adherence to the recommenda- tions of the soils report. 12. If, according to maps and other information available to Weld County, the Department of Planning Services determines that there appears to be a sand, gravel, or other mineral resources on or under the subject property, the applicant shall provide a mineral resourse statement prepared by a certified geologist _ or other qualified expert. The statement shall indicate the estimated quality of resources and indicate the economic feasi- bility of recovery, now and in the future, of the resources so that the Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners can determine whether a COMMERCIAL MINERAL DEPOSIT, as defined in Colorado Revised Statues is contained on or under the sub- ject properties. This information will be forwarded to the Colorado Geological Survey for evaluation. 920450 According to U. S. Soil Conservation Service maps , there appears to be no evidence of commercial grade mineral or gravel deposits underlying the site. In addition, there are no records of mineral owners or lessees other than oil and gas leases, for the subject property. Borings have been accomplished to determine gravel resources _ on the site. The results of that testing show an average depth of 11 . 5 feet of gravel with an average depth of over- burden of 3 feet. The ratio of mineable gravel to overburden is 3. 8 to 1, a ratio somewhat higher than 3 to 1 that generally describes a gravel mine to be of economic value. However, the size of the parcel remaining after required setbacks in combination with the marginal ratio of gravel to overburden would render the gravel recovery uneconomic. Only about 26 acres are actually mineable after setbacks and excavation slopes are honored, thereby rendering a full scale mining operation most unlikely and generally uneconomic. Oil and gas mineral rights are leased. It is the intent of the applicant to obtain an agreement with the lessees for an agreeable drill site, if necessary, that will be allocated on the final PUD plat. 13 . If the proposed change of zone is located within a FLOOD HAZARD AREA, identified by maps officially adopted by Weld County, the applicant shall submit information which either documents how the Weld County supplementary regulations con- cerning flood plains have been satisfied or document how the applicant intends to meet the requirements of the Weld County supplementary regulations concerning flood plains. The FEMA maps and information for this location have been developed using USGS quadrangle topographic data and without _ the benefit of drainage investigations or studies of the area. Fortunately, however, unpublished floodplain information pre- pared by the U.S. Corps of Engineers does provide floodplain elevations for the 100-year flood boundary. These elevations are nearly the same as the existing contours and will be re- flected on the final PUD plan. The unpublished information is available at the Colorado Water Conservation Office. The completed structures will be constructed at elevations above the floodplain elevations to satisfy surface drainage and sanitary sewer needs. 14 . If the proposed change of zone is located within a GEOLOGIC HAZARD AREA identified by maps officially adopted by Weld County, the applicant shall submit information which either documents how the Weld County supplementary regulations con- cerning geologic hazards have been satisfied, or documents how the applicant intends to meet the requirements of the Weld County supplementary regulations concerning geologic hazards . 920450 The PUD is not located within any known geologic hazard areas as defined by the Geologic Hazard Map adopted by Weld County on April 19, 1978 . There are no known apparent hazards, restrictions, or over- lay districts that would conflict with the PUD application. The area is in the St. Vrain/Boulder Creek flood zone as designated by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) . There are no known geological hazards related to this area . 15. A sign shall be posted on the property under consideration for PUD rezoning. The sign shall be posted by the applicant, who shall certify that the sign has been posted for at least ten ( 10 ) days preceding the hearing date. The sign shall be provided by the Department of Planning Services . The required sign will be posted by the applicant and the affidavit will be forwarded to the County at that time. 16 . A certified list of the names, addresses and the corresponding parcel identification number assigned by the Weld County Assessor of the owners of property (the surface estate) within five hundred (500) feet of the property subject to the appli- cation. The source of such list shall be the records of the Weld County Assessor, or an ownership update from a title or abstract company or attorney, derived from such records , or from the records of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. If the list was assembled from the records of the Weld County Assessor, the applicant shall certify that such list was assembled within thirty (30) days of the application submis- sion date. A certified list of property owners within 500 feet of the property was prepared by Nelson Engineers and is attached. 17 . A certified list of the names and addresses of mineral owners and lessees of mineral owners on or under the parcel of land being considered. The source of such list shall be assembled from the records of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder, or from an ownership update derived from such records of a title or abstract company or prepared by an attorney derived from such records. A certified list of the names and addresses of mineral owners and leases of mineral owners on or under the parcel was pre- pared by Nelson Engineers and is attached. 18 . Such additional information as may be required by the Depart- - ment of Planning Services, the Planning Commissioner, or the Board of County Commissioners in order to determine that the application meets the goals, policies, and standards set forth in the Weld County Zoning Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan. 920450 The recent change in the Weld County Comprehensive Plan, _ wherein the 1-25 Mixed Use Development Area (MUDA) and Activity Center was created will encourage changes of use and activities in the MUDA. The property is in the South- west Weld Enterprise Zone and is projected as a commercial district by the Weld County Planning Office. The develop- ment of the public sanitary sewer has further enhanced the potential of changes of use and activities. As a result there have been and will be changing conditions in the vici- nity that warrant this change of zone. To further substan- tiate the need for change of zone, the soils data available and parcel location indicate that this is not prime agricul- tural land, nor can it be feasibly developed for mineral resource development. 920450 LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL "A" OF RECORDED EXEMPTION NO. 1313-10-2-RE 103 , RECORDED JANUARY 28 , 1974 IN BOOK 707 AS RECEPTION NO. 1629215, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: A TRACT OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M. , BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 10, FROM WHENCE THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 10 BEARS NORTH 00°33 ' 05" EAST, 131.4 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°33 ' 05" WEST, 1107 . 05 FEET; THENCE ALONG AN EXISTING FENCE LINE SOUTH 89°57 ' 10" EAST, 1323 .85 FEET TO A FENCE CORNER; THENCE ALONG AN EXISTING FENCE LINE NORTH 00°14 ' 50" EAST 1149 . 40 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF COLORADO STATE HIGHWAY 119 ; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY OF COLORADO STATE HIGHWAY 119 THE FOLLOWING THREE ( 3) COURSES AND DISTANCES: NORTH 89°36 ' 10" WEST 1,237 .05 FEET; SOUTH 45°48 ' 50" WEST 70. 80 FEET; NORTH 89°36 ' 10" WEST 30.0 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID PARCEL CONTAIN 34. 91 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. 9 20450 II SOIL SURVEY WELD COUNTY, COLORADO II United State Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service In Cooperatrion With Colorado Agricultural Experiment Station S20450 r t 82 82 �� 81 "24. �� t �Bit�c, �/ N j 3 e.2,x•4 `1 JL , --, �,-� 1 3 32 , \ ar,,t 33, v ,sir f 't 4/7",yy J�ali r`i'A'I a\ 5`"S' azl'4+ ' t f r ,ft Ly y#r t �i :9:::Zit.t «..qs'>i.i< .xe1.C Y i r rrt 1 }{5' ° ".f{.`X �, ry '!� `7 ` r !,42:. - y ne,:TrA)`vYt �n " i; 5 % .rr 16 �r.•df. i+_x[n.W�{,.r�x! AA'' y "f ..r9yA I.cM r H �ql' .rav 4 .e, ,,o, A'Y 4. ,�,yy��,, 65 r r �.i{ r 16 r `�f 1 i �' 1 � J 4 r 4 6r ""year` r < "',iS,4:1:t'+t n r 82 R , x46, • a, t�•1{'j`,,%82cr ''4•" '',t" ;•-,1,..,`.4 1'2't a 65 65 iiRA[N- / ' r« - - 41 •.�v 'ar 3 ,,f:-4,0•.71 ,,*3`n77: J `6v - i1.,1 ig J%�i sr y; 9 SG�t ii ii, 27 t ate' ' 82 z:� 16 `� !.c. 59y f sr :i iz t4t 45 fyn�-a °M1^ �1 ¢tater t 'X yy ., *, “:;?,4;•,;tr �1n. Crr f y4 ' ^ • P , �. ]9. Y+ tV • �1�n r yy� Yi PST ¢�/ � / < 3 ,.,4,,,,::-; ' mSY Ay t� :5-4,44-,,,?,,,,, ia0i� J L' ^ e...f.• E ^ p' ::'; ` C>K 3, ty ,;s it- igi;r.` K 1a W ��r, ( c ''.. a • Lg •t. k^77 Cf 'y arC� dy ..i i pv� r -,s';',... r � z ��"}t.)�+ r rt'.o ,1 431...65 1Q rF+ ♦ ¢` c 3 wat¢T C mr,5 t�gt � 4 v n in • M 3 t, 54byy,"��+�'i �r rv'Y6a h � .3, t _. J �j 't � `V �.c Yfrvd {j 42 27 PM q4 n - _ < 'ua.^._xJ r flt4•5Ar 4`4 0`lac' �44&. .tr. .44... c ..,i:.:7:14,-7.,,:,7., t fi5 * � •• � Al " a.$t'M`r • 6.� 'kT^r•" . i o-i a uaT5 H f , • Es .:��.LLs t a Z. .iNM4LL Sc V.V.'.','“ s`}y... .ry IZ.t�., Fap•. - y 1� '�':®' { . 'ttti' 4 yM3 Y 2 S Pk. ic 83 ' 'w *-- . '.+t, it . I. t { 40,177--- : ,,51.4;-; J' 276? 13 i. µa:r i � t b� �J. 5 .. ,t,T ^111 r'J r R* _ [LCZ{YY . le calkt Y �ct1� it ,ue `L n � °' � `lo" �k I �t ,ta-.— v f:3,- pf S • +y pe f ,T iii V u - fC-`<.r-R+t `F of �r [S ..w s Q '�, FNz'+'Y� 5 ..e. s -' Y�i P ! Az..)„ .. �,$1T`!x* "✓t t8".rinS ?„...,....;,,,,t..-4., iR Ly Q 1 .,ti #r �+ / a7 27 Y Y �.I }$�.�` i�:r Yom\ ('f t r fie' .S'tt r ; t 3 Vj7r1•� rtiar J 3 1'K k • t 47 a ' F i t 'Sp '-7.:A.427/Vi::?-4;.:4 :a 1 _ • S •� k r -t ..... i I :. -'i,,,j'"' ✓Tye-rr i 1 l '77 to ,'. ra+ �� z a' i 1 5 1.c % gh a. ✓ x ; 7] c� 77 v - rl f4 s4 T.w`,,y, 3 1 e 4 - ' t 76' o ..14:1-41i.'2.1- q2 fir yx',t"'s ' j\..i�,77" 3' r�,-c'Ci .:p' > ,•. c i ' t 113v1i, , A - r ..e p 4 ei i t l .....n j .} *1!(C,s r' .+,s 75 r.v ✓Y .5r tibf rc !rtl t2 • � a sfd' , x-/ z �rrna te-Y �(y5✓ 4 p '!'46.2417;48 % i t14 4 1'3.411, t -?.,..2.43. ft Siy rot t,&� r ' .I 7b ..,;44,1% Jess t4' .35 ,1 yf ?` :r it,.-ii "b Y'{ `R t 'yam .. I t :. Pr Sc 'fr14',r �.,1 .,,ttf �'" . ,t' ara fy.- ,t iv. w ,-4 #": in�tf �A•{_ o- wY as 77 • 4rf:. ,r � vY?CM` � e 'O a K , z c. ?i rr � 76\i z ,y 4 i .ctM t !�Wer Mt'*-‘,1,..;-:$4.c..,."4,. C_ .,,tt.l7' `_.. a� (7 !_.. �99 '� h`lr � {+z ' � '�.' ` F �t , 10 :,... .6.4:',W;,...4[�}�f, r'N� L 4'4.'44'41 /�« r.. �ti1 t t7Fr?� 4'r, troc 5t "L'b a ..wM K }p, r 1...",v,1*-! iy 37 5 , t 7Y'ta+48- 53 S fir - On � v S t {'' t.rnz`: 47 3. -43"-.4,,,,,,'"44k ;•ft„1.4 - ek .,` -,am, ? .__ - ♦ i.r.; 3fh77 eY ‘1'",,,•:-.12',4"••••:".'. ',,:*. r51 {{ _. r3ry 76 r0,ut j� 1}�v ? .. .t38 X Sd i 577 vrr�a 1 61 s;', . lo.i•i ' Ix,{/ 3ar t��k Fx��hx A,., .. xr x&. i y. .,.�.WKA';.f» wy t L p1' I ''. F ,q,a$ y 22 rid 3frq a� 7 a '•65 - SOIL SURVEY — 8 Tilt the leachate. Sewage lagoons require sealing. GO percent of the unit. Aquents, which have a light Lawn shrubs, and trees grow well. Capability subclass colored ope or d surfs ace Aqueptser,and mBake up boutyloout 35 pe cent. Abe 5 - Its irri ted. These are deep, poorly drained soils that for ed in 2l r in loam, 1 torr 3 percent slopes.of 4,500,s is a deep, typical. Com only the well drained oil on terraces at elevations to 4,900 recent alluvium. No one pedon is led, dly line feet. It forme in mapping d alluvium s areas of soils that kaline loamy or clayey therttllsurface a layer o a underlying - rivers. Included ma pp g are mall show evidence of p r drainage. Also included are small, material and are underlain by sand or nd and gravel long and narrow area f sand and gravel deposits. within 48 inches. In places they have a yed layer in the Typically the surface er of this Altvan soil is grayish underlying material. brown loam about 10 inch thick The subsoil is brown Most of the acreage is subject t flooding. The water and light yellowish brown cl loam and sandy clay loam table is at or near the surface ear in spring and recedes about 14 inches thick.The subs atum is calcareous loamy to as deep as 48 inches late in f in some years. - sand about 5 inches thick over gr elly sand. These soils are used for ra eland and wildlife habitat. Permeability and available ter capacity are Some small areas have bee eclaimed by major drainage moderate. The effective rooting depth 's 20 to 40 inches. and leveling and are used r irrigated crops. Surface runoff is medium, and the erosio hazard is low. The potential native egetation is dominated by alkali - This soil is used almost entirely for irri ted crops. It sacaton, switchgrass, d western wheatgrass. Saltgrass, is suited to all crops commonly grown in the a, includ- sedge, rush, and ali bluegrass are also prominent. ing corn, sugar beets, beans, alfalfa, small grain, otatoes, Potential producti ranges from 3,000 pounds per acre in _ and onions. An example of a suitable cropping sys m is 3 favorable years 2,000 pounds in unfavorable years. As to 4 years of alfalfa followed by corn, con for s ge, range condit n. deteriorates, the switchgrass, alkali sugar beets, small grain, or beans. Land leveling, di h sacaton, an western wheatgrass decrease and saltgrass, lining, and installing pipelines may be needed for prope sedge, an rush increase. water application. Mana ement of vegetation should be based on taking All methods of irrigation are suitable, but furrow ir- ha d leaving half of the total annual production. Seed- rigation is the most common. Barnyard manure and corn- ing difficult and costly because numerous tillage prac- _ mercial reakzpr are needed for top yields. t• es a required to eliminate the saltgrass sod. Windbreaks and environmental ns of trees and witchgra western wheatgrass, alkali sacaton, tall shrubs commonly grown in the area are generally well wheatgrass, d tall fescue are suitable for seeding. They suited to this soil. Cultivation to control competin can be seede into a clan, firm seedbed. Seedbed vegetation should be continued for as many years s preparation usu requires more than 1 year to possible following planting.Trees that are best sui and eliminate the saltgr s sod. A grass drill should be used. have good survival are Rocky Mountain juniper, tern Seeding early in sprin as proven most successful. redcedar, ponderosa pine, Siberian elm, Russian ve, and Wetland wildlife, espe ally waterfowl, utilize this unit. hackberry. The shrubs best suited are skunkb sh sumac, The wetland plants provid esting and protective cover, lilac, Siberian peashrub, and American plum. as well as some food. The earby irrigated cropland, This for openland produce habitat elements easant,t are ccohtton-ly where wildlife obtain much of t it food and fmd protec- tail,_ suitable n wildlife cops at, corn, and tive cover, makes this unit valuab to both wetland and and mourning dove. Such crops wheat, and openland alfalfa provide suitable habitat f openland wildlife, opeOpnllandand wildlife.wildlife, especially pheasan use this unit for undisturbed espesilb pheasant.esi Tree and hrub plantings and cover and nesting. Deer find excellent over in some nesting cover woul enhance openland wil- areas. dlife populations. These valuable wildlife areas should be pro cted from This Altvan soil has fair o chief limiting potential for urban fire and fenced to prevent encroachment and o ruse by and r recreationaloruan developm t. The the shrink-swell sp fen- livestock. They should not be drained. decor for urban develop eft are rapidoten- These soils have good potential as a source of san nd ti permeability al f the subsoil f as it and and dries and the rapid ravel. Capability subclass VIw; Salt Meadow range site. bsr of the and gravel s bstrin places e he g 4—Aquolls and Aguepts, flooded. This nearly level tank substratum on ft of contain function ugh but in properly map unit is in depressions in smooth plains and along the substratum doe not Sewage eain lagoons on fines itto psealing. bottoms of natural drainageways throughout the survey filt Lawns,hr the le hate. sg pprebuiry sealing. area. Aquolls, which have a dark colored surface layer, shr s, and trees grow well. Capability subclass make up about 55 percent of the unit. Aquepts, which Ile irrigat A 3—A oils and Aquents, gravelly substratum. This have a lighter colored surface layer, make up about 25 nearly evel map unit is on bottom lands and flood plains percent. About 20 percent is soils that are well drained he of • the have a darkcolored major sremsin thee layer, make up about the area. soils that have sandstone or shale within 48 inches of wl 97,114.50 WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, SOUTHERN PART 9 These are deep, poorly drained soils that formed in f summer fallowed in alternate years, this soil is wel recent alluvium. No one pedon is typical. Commonly the sui wee ed is the winter al crop.barley,Tre predicteds um. yield Wines soils have a mottled, mildly to moderately alkaline loamyprincipal or clayey surface layer and underlying material that ex- 33 b shels perseeded.acre. r pr ecipitation winterkilled, too ow for spr tends to a depth of 60 inches or more. In places they have a can b be l use d Generally ner. a gleyed layer in the underlying material. Stub fi mulch farming, striperopping, and minim n Most of the acreage is subject to excessive runoff. The til- water table is at or near the surface in spring and during lage are ceded to control soil blowing and water rosion. the peak of the irrigation season. Terracin also may be needed to control water er ion. These soils are used for rangeland and wildlife habitat. The po ntial native vegetation on this ran site is Some small areas are irrigated pasture. dominated y sand bluestem, sand reedgrass, and blue The potential native vegetation is dominated by grama. Ne leandthread, switchgrass, sideo is grama, switchgrass, prairie cordgrass, saltgrass, alkali sacaton, and western wheatgrass are also promine . Potential - big bluestem, indiangrass, western wheatgrass, slender Production ra ges from 2,200 pounds per a e in favora- wheatgrass, sedge, and rush. Cattails and bullrush grow ble years to 1, 00 pounds in unfavorable y ars. As range in the swampy spots associated with these range sites. condition deteri rates, the sand bluestem, and reedgrass, _ Potential production ranges from 4,000 pounds per acre in and switchgrass ecrease and blue gram sand dropseed, and sand sage in ease. Annual weeds a d grasses invade favorable years to 3,000 pounds in unfavorable years. As the site as range c ndition becomes poo er. range condition deteriorates, the tall and mid grasses Management of egetation should e based on taking decrease, production drops, and saltgrass, sedge, and rush half and leaving hal of the total ann I production. Seed- increase. The farming and irrigation in adjacent areas has ing is desirable if t range is in oor condition. Sand increased the amount of salts on much of the acreage. bluestem, sand reed s, switch ss, sideoats grama, Management of vegetation on this soil should be based blue grama, pubescen wheatgra , and crested wheat- on taking half and leaving half of the total annual este - grass are suitable for eding. T e grass selected should tion. Switchgrass, big bluestem, indiangrass, western meet the seasonal regm emen of livestock. It can be wheatgrass, pubescent wheatgrass, intermediate wheat- seeded into a clean, firm sorg um stubble, or it can be grass, tall wheatgrass, and tall fescue are suitable for drilled into a firm prepa d eedbed. Seeding early in seeding. The plants selected should met the seasonal spring has proven most suc sful. requirements of livestock. For successful seeding, a firm Windbreaks and environ ntal plantings are generally prepared seedbed is needed. A grass drill should be used. suited to this soil. Soil bl g, the principal hazard in Seeding early in spring has proven most successful. Til- establishing trees and sh bs, can be controlled by cul- " — lage is needed to eliminate the undesirable vegetation. tivating only in the tre row d by leaving a strip of Wetland wildlife, especially waterfowl, utilize this unit. vegetation between th rows. Supplemental irrigation The wetland plants provide nesting and protective cover may be needed at the time of anting and during dry as well as some food. The nearby irrigated cropland, periods. Trees that ar best suited nd have good survival where wildlife obtain much of their food and find protec- are Rocky Mountain uniper, easte redcedar, ponderosa tive cover, makes this unit valuable to both wetland and pine, Siberian elm, Russianolive, nd hackberry. The openland wildlife. shrubs best suited re skunkbush su ac, lilac, and Siberi- Openland wildlife, especially pheasant, use this unit for an peashrub. cover and nesting. Deer find excellent cover in some Wildlife is an i portant secondary u e of this soil. The areas. These valuable wildlife areas should be protected cropland areas rovide favorable habi for ring-necked from fire and fenced to prevent encroachment and pheasant and ourning dove. Many non me species can overuse by livestock. They should not be drained. Capa- be attracted b establishing areas for ne ing and escape bility subclass VIw; Aquolls in Salt Meadow range site, cover. For p easants, undisturbed nesting over is essen- Aquepts in Wet Meadow range site. tial and sho Id be included in plans for ha itat develop- -- r—Ascalon sandy loam, I to 3 percent slopes. This " ment. Ran land wildlife, for example, the p onghorn an- a de well drained soil on uplands at elevations ,600 telope, ca be attracted by developing livesto k watering to 5,200 It formed in alluvium. Included - mapping facilities, managing livestock grazing, and reseeding are small areas rock outcrop. where n eded. Typically the su e layer is br sandy loam about Few real of this Ascalon soil are in major gr wth and 10 inches thick. The su '1 i ale brown and yellowish urbani ed centers. The shrink-swell potential of he sub- brown sandy clay loam • u 5 inches thick. The sub- soil a it wets and dries is the most limiting soil eature stratum to a depth 60 inches i lcareous fine sandy that must be considered in planning homesites an I con- loam. str cting roads. Capability subclass IIIe nonirri ated; Perme• - ity is moderate. Available wale 'apacity is Sa dy Plains range site. high e effective rooting depth is 60 inches o Wore. 6—Ascalon sandy loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes. Th • is rface runoff is slow, and the erosion hazard is low. ' deep, well drained soil on uplands at elevations of 4, 00 • 920450 — 12 SOIL SURVEY is soil has good potential for urban and recreat al Wildlife is an important secondary use of this soil. The _ deve o rout. Increased population growth in t urvey cropland areas provide favorable habitat for ring-necked asant . Many chiefarea has re limiting so in increased for urban de co •opmentlon. The are the beeattracteddby establishing areas forongame n sting species d[escape shrink-swell iofili f the subs to sus pt ort ats and dries load. Septic taler. For and should be includedheasants, tinbed nesting cover is essen- p plans for habitat develop- _ and the limited ability of roperly, especially agriculture. Range- tank absorption fields f o 'ethe population den- landtwildlife, for example,fdeernand antelope, can be at- sewage systems sho be provide sity increases. cause of the moderate rapid perinea- traded by managing livestock grazing and reseeding — bility oft substratum, sewage lagoons mu be sealed. where needed. Law , shrubs, and trees grow well. Capability class me ts soil is becausenot ofsthe floodd to rhazard.n or rCapabilty subclass r_Band. IVw irrigated, VIw nonirrigated; Sandy Bottom land 10—Bankard sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes. This - is a deep, somewhat excessively drained soil on flood range site. esser sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes. This i plains at elevations of 4,450 to 5,000 feet. It formed in stratified recent alluvium along streams and rivers. In- a d ep, well drained soil on terraces at elevations of 4,7 e eluded in mapping are numerous sand and gravel bars to 4, 00 feet. It formed in alluvium deposited by and small areas of noncalcareous soils. South latte River. Included in mapping are small eas Typically the surface layer of this Bankard soil is of soil that have sand and gravelly sand in the ower brown sandy loam about 4 inches thick. The underlying part of t e substratum. brown sa dy loam material to a depth of 60 inches is pale brown calcareous Typical the surface layer is grayish— sand stratified with thin lenses of sandy loam, loam, and about 11 in hes thick. The subsoil is brown and ellowish fine gravel. brown sand clay loam about 19 inches thic . The sub- Permeability is moderately rapid. Available water stratum to a pth of 60 inches is loamy sand capacity is low.The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or permeability and available water apacity are more. Surface runoff is slow, and the erosion hazard is moderate. The ffective rooting depth i 60 inches or low more. Surface ru off is slow, and the e osion hazard is This soil is suited to limited cropping. It is sandy and low. subject to flooding. Pasture is the best use. Tall wheat- This soil is used most entirely for irrigated crops. It grass, tall fescue, and annual sweetclover are some of the is suited to all crops ommonly grow in the area includ- most suitable crops. Light, frequent irrigation by furrows mg corn, sugar beets, eans, alfalfa, mall grain, potatoes, and flooding is best. Commercial fertilizer improves the and onions. An example f a suita e cropping system is 3 amount and value of forage produced. to 4 years of alfalfa fo owed corn, corn for silage, The potential native vegetation is dominated by sugar beets, small grain, o bea . Few conservation prac- switchgrass, indiangrass, sand bluestem, sand reedgrass, tices are needed to maintain to yields. sideoats grama, needleandthread, and blue grama. Much All methods of irrigation re suitable, but furrow ir- rigation is the most commo . arnyard manure and corn- such this range site includes other soils and vegetation in such a complex pattern that it is difficult to map them mercial fertilizer are need fo top yields. separately. Potential production ranges from 2,500 pounds Windbreaks and envir menta plantings are generally suited to this soil. Soil lowing, e principal hazard in per acre in favorable years to 1,500 pounds in unfavorab• le years. As range condition deteriorates, the tall and mid establishing trees and shrubs, can be controlled by cul- grasses decrease; blue grama, sand dropseed, and forbs tivating only in the ree row and leaving a strip of increase; and forage production drops. Undesirable weeds vegetation betwee the rows. Sup emental irrigation and annuals invade the site as range condition becomes may be needed a the time of planti and during dry poorer. Ma periods. Trees th are best suited and h ve good survival Managemleaent of half vegetation t should be du ioo taking are Rocky Mou in juniper, eastern redc dar, ponderosa — half and desirable in the total annualenough to intersn.eed ed o- Pine, Siberian elm, Russian-olive, and h ckberry. shrubs best s ited are skunkbush sumac, lila , and ing is only areas large to interseed or to prepare a seedbed. Switchgrass, sand bluestem, sand an peashrub Siberi- reedgrass, sideoats grama, little bluestem, blue grama, pu- Wildlife s an important secondary use o this soil. Ring-nec rod pheasant, mourning dove, and n by -- bescent e wheatgrass, and intermediate ilcan wheatgrass are s cies can be attracted by establishing a eas for suitable for seeding. This soil be seeded by using an g- nestin and escape cover. For pheasants, undi turbed non- interseeder or a firm, clean sorghum stubble. A grass drill game is required. Seeding early in spring has proven most suc- nesti g cover is essential and should be included in lans This cessful.— soil is generally not suited to the establishment for abitat development, especially in areas of inte sive and growth of trees and shrubs. Onsite investigation is ag 'his soil culture. for needed to determine feasibility and possible tree and evelopment.a Lawns, shrubs, and tees grow`well. T ll h shrub species. 920450 100 SOIL SURVEY TABLE 6.--BUILDING SITE DEVELOPMENT --- [Some of the terms used in this table to describe restrictive soil features are defined in the Glossary. See text for definitions of "slight," "moderate," and "severe." Absence of an entry means soil was not rated] -r Soil name and Shallow Dwellings Dwellings Small Local roads map symbol excavations without with commercial and streets basements basements buildings 1, 2 Severe: Moderate: Moderate: Moderate: Moderate: Altvan cutbanks cave. shrink-swell. shrink-swell. shrink-swell. - shrink-swell , frost action. _ 3': Aquolls Severe: Severe: Severe: Severe: Severe: floods, floods, floods, floods, floods, wetness. wetness. wetness. wetness. wetness, frost action. Aquents Severe: Severe: Severe: Severe: Severe: floods, floods, floods, floods, floods, wetness. wetness. wetness. wetness. wetness, frost action. 4•. Aquolls Severe: Severe: Severe: Severe: Severe: floods, floods, floods, floods, floods, wetness. wetness. wetness. wetness. wetness, frost action. Aquepts Severe: Severe: Severe: Severe: Severe: floods, floods, floods, floods, floods, wetness. wetness. wetness. wetness. wetness, -- frost action. 5 Slight Moderate: Moderate: Moderate: Moderate: Ascalon low strength. low strength. low strength. frost action, low strength. 6, 7 Slight Moderate: Moderate: Moderate: Moderate: Ascalon low strength. low strength. slope, frost action, low strength. low strength. 8, 9 Slight Moderate: Moderate: Moderate: Moderate: Ascalon low strength. low strength. low strength. frost action, low strength. 10 Severe: Severe: Severe: Severe: Severe: Bankard cutbanks cave, floods. floods. floods. floods. floods. 11 , 12 Slight Slight Slight Slight Moderate: — Bresser frost action. 13 Severe: Moderate: Moderate: Severe: Moderate: Cascajo cutbanks cave, slope. slope. slope. slope. small stones. 14, 15 Slight Slight Slight Slight Moderate: low strength. Colby 16, 17 Slight Slight Slight Moderate: Moderate: — Colby slope. low strength. t8': Colby l Slight Slight Slight Moderate: Moderate: slope. low strength. Adena ;Slight Moderate: Moderate: Moderate: Moderate: low strength. low strength. low strength, low strength. slope. See footnote at end of table. g�,/� 92045O 104 SOIL SURVEY TABLE 7.--SANITARY FACILITIES (Some of the terms used in this table to describe restrictive soil features are defined in the Glossary . See text for definitions of "slight," "moderate," "good," "fair ," and other terms used to rate soils. Absence of an entry means soil was not rated) - - Area Daily cover Soil name and Septic tank Sewage lagoonTrench for landfill map symbol absorption areas sanitary sanitary fields landfill landfill ,Severe: :Severe: Slight Fair: I Z Slight thin layer . Altvan ; seepage. : seepage. 3': Severe: Severe: Poor: Aquolls Severe: Sflood: floods, floods, floods, wetness. wetness. wetness. wetness. wetness. Aquents Severe: Severe: Severe: Severe: Poor: - , floods, floods, wetness. wetness. floods, wetness. wetness. , wetness. 4': Severe: Poor: Aquolls Severe: Severe: ;Severe: floods, floods, 1 floods, wetness. , wetness. wetness. wetness. ; wetness. ;Severe: Severe: Poor: ; Severe: , wetness. Aquepts ,Severe:floods ,floods, ; floods, wetness.; wetness. wetness. wetness. ;Severe: :Severe: Severe:; Good. 5 6 Slight seepage. Ascalon 1 seepage. seepage. ;Severe: Severe: ;Severe: Good. 7 ;Slight ; slope, seepage. seepage. Ascalon seepage. —. 8, 9 ;Slight Severe: Severe: Severe: Good. Ascalon seepage. seepage. seepage. 0Severe: Severe: Severe: Fair: IB ;S flood: floods, floods. too sandy. Bankard floods. floods , _ seepage. seepage. Severe: Severe: Severe: Good. 11 12ss Slight seepage. seepage. Breer seepage. Severe: Severe:; Poor: -- 13 Moderate: Severe: small stones. Cascajo slope. slope, seepage. ; seepage. seepage, small stones. j4 ty 16 Slight Moderate: ;Slight Slight Good. Colby seepage. 17 Slight ,Severe: 'Slight Slight Good. Colby ; slope . 1 : Slight Good. Colby Slight ;Severe: Slight g slope . _ ;Slight Slight Good. Adena Moderate: ;Moderate: peres slowly. ; seepage, slope. ,Moderate: Moderate: Good. 19 Moderate: :S lood: ; floods. floods. Colombo ; floods., ; f floods. 20 Slight ;Moderate: ;Slight Slight Good. Colombo ; slope, seepage. See footnote at end of table. 9,Z0459 108 SOIL SURVEY TABLE 8.--CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS tures e ned the ry.[Some tof heext"for"derms used efinitionsn ofh"g000dd," "fair,"r describe restrictive andc"unsuited." Absence"of d an i entrynmeansG soils e to was not rated) Soil name and Roadfill fill Sand Gravel Topsoil map symbol Good Fair: Fair: Fair: 1 , - excess fines. excess fines. thin layer. Altvan -- 3* ' Good Fair: Poor: Aquolls Poor: wetness, excess fines. wetness. frost action. Aquents Poor: Good Fair: Poor: wetness, excess fines. wetness. frost action. 4*: Unsuited Poor: Aquolls Poor: Unsuited wetness. wetness, frost action. Unsuited Poor: Aquepts Poor: Unsuited wetness. -_ ue to ess, frost action. 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 Fair: Poor: Unsuited Good. Ascalon low strength, excess fines. -- frost action, shrink-swell. Fair: Unsuited Poor: Bankard Fair: B ankard low strength. excess fines. too sandy. Poor: Unsuited Fair: 11 F fro: small stones. Dressss er frost action. excess Cines. Good Good Poor: 13 Good small stones. __ Cascajo 14, 15, 16, 17 Fair: Unsuited Unsuited Good. Colby low strength. 18*. Unsuited Unsuited Good. Colby Fair: low strength. Unsuited Fair: Adena ;Fair: Unsuited too clayey. I low strength. 19, 20 Unsuited Unsuited Fair: ;Fair: too clayey. Colombo I low strength, frost action. Good Good Fair: 21 o22n ;Good too clayey. Dacono ;Fair: Unsuited Unsuited Good. _ 23, 21: Fort Collins ; low strength. 25, 26 ;Fa ir: Unsuited Unsuited Good. Haverson I low strength. Unsuited 27 , ;Poor: ;Unsuited Poor: too clayey. Heldd"t shrink-swell , low strength. See footnote at end of table. 920450 WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, SOUTHERN PART 111 TABLE 9.--WATER MANAGEMENT [Someo ofa then tere mse uses dsiin nl this not lev tou destlribe restrictive soil features are defined in the Glossary. Absence to Irrigation Terraces Grassed _ Soil name and Pond Embankments, Drainage and waterways map symbol reservoir dikes, and diversions areas levees 1, 2 Seepage Thin layer Favorable 'Favorable Rooting depth Rooting depth. Altvan 3*: Floods, ;Floods, Wetness Wetness. Aquolls poor outlets. 1 wetness. Floods, ;Floods, Wetness Wetness. Aquents poor outlets. ; wetness. —. 4a: Floods, 1 Floods, Wetness Wetness. Aquolls poor outlets. wetness. Floods, Floods, 'Wetness Wetness. Aquepts poor outlets. wetness. 5 Seepage, Piping, ;Slope Slope, Erodes easily, Erodes easily. Ascalon slope., low strength. : erodes easily. piping. ;Slope Slope, Erodes easily, Erodes easily , 6 Seepage P lown s, erodes easily. piping. slope. Ascalon slope. low strength. ; ;Slope Slope, Erodes easily, Erodes easily, 7 , Piping, erodes easily. piping, slope. Ascalon slope. low strength. , slope. 8 Seepage, Piping, Favorable Favorable ;Erodes easily, Erodes easily. Ascalon slope. low strength. ; piping. Slo e, Erodes easily, Erodes easily. -- 9 Seepage, Piping, Slope P Ascalon slope., low strength. erodes easily. piping. Erodes easily, Droughty, Bankard Seepage Piping, Cutbanks cave, Droughty, erodes easily. seepage, floods, floods, piping. e ankard erodes easily. poor outlets. seepage. Erodes easily, Erodes easily. 11 Seepage Favorable Favorable Droughty piping. Bresser Slope, Erodes easily, Erodes easily. 12 Seepage, Favorable Slope erodes easily. piping. Bresser slope. Seepage Slope Slope, Complex slope, Droughty, 13 Seepage droughty. Piping, slope. Case a,jo slope. too sandy. 14 Seepage Low strength, Favorable Favorable Favorable Favorable. Colby piping. Favorable Slope, 15 Seepage Lou strength, Favorable Favorable erodes easily. Colby piping. Low strength, Slope; Slope,; Favorable Slope, 16 17by Seepage erodes easily. erodes easily . _ Colby piping. 18x: Slope, ;Favorable Slope, Colby Seepage Low strength, Slope erodes easily. ; erodes easily. piping. Slope, Slope,; Slope , Adena Slope, Low strength, Slope, arcs slowl piping percs slowly. seepage. piping. percs slowly. p y• P p g' 19 Seepage Low strength, Floods Favorable Erodes easily Erodes easily. Colombo compressible. See footnote at end of table. 9.0'159 - 116 SOIL SURVEY TABLE 10.--RECREATIONAL DEVELOPMENT [Some of the terms used in this table to describe restrictive soil features are defined in the Glossary. See — text for definitions of "slight," "moderate," and "severe." Absence of an entry means soil was not rated) • —r — Soil name and Camp areas Picnic areas Playgrounds Paths and trails map symbol 1 Slight Slight Slight Slight. Altvan 2 Slight Slight Moderate: :Slight. Altvan slope. 3* Aquolls Severe: Severe: Severe: ;.Severe: wetness, wetness, wetness, ; wetness, floods. floods. floods. 1 floods. Aquent_ Severe: - Severe: Severe: :Severe: wetness, wetness, wetness , wetness, floods. floods. floods. floods. - 4*: Aquolls Severe: Severe: Severe: . Severe: wetness, wetness, wetness, wetness, floods. floods. floods. floods. Aquepts Severe: Severe: Severe: Severe: wetness, wetness, wetness, wetness, floods. floods. floods. floods. _ 5, 6 Slight Slight Moderate: Slight. A%talon - slope. 7 Slight Slight Severe: Slight. Ascalon slope. 8 Slight Slight Slight Slight. Ascalon 9 Slight Slight Moderate: Slight. Ascalon slope. 10 Severe: Moderate: Severe: Slight. Bankard floods. floods, floods. too sandy. 11 Slight Slight Slight Slight. Bresser 12 Slight Slight Moderate: Slight. — Bresser slope. 13 Moderate: Moderate: Severe: Moderate: Cascajo slope, slope, slope, small stones. small stones. small stones. small stones. - 14 Moderate: Moderate: Moderate: Moderate: Colby dusty. dusty. dusty. dusty. 15, 16 Moderate: Moderate: Moderate: Moderate: — Colby dusty. dusty. slope, dusty. dusty. 17 Moderate: Moderate: Severe: Moderate: Colby dusty. dusty. slope. dusty. 18*: Colby Moderate: Moderate: Severe: Moderate: dusty. dusty. slope. dusty. See footnote at end of table. 9' 045!) WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, SOUTHERN PART 121 TABLE 11.--WILDLIFE HABITAT POTENTIALS [See text for definitions of "good," "fair," "poor," and "very poor." Absence of an entry indicates the soil — was not rated] Potential for habitat elements Potential as habitat for-__ for- Soil name and Wild — map symbol Grain Grasses herba- Shrubs Wetland Shallow Openland ' Wetland Rangeland and seed and ceous plants water wildlife wildlife wildlife crops" legumes plants _r areas r____ — 1 2 Good Good Fair Fair Poor Very poor Good Very poor Fair. Altvan 3': Aquolls Poor Poor . Good Fair Good Good Fair Good Fair. Aquents Poor Poor Good Fair Good Good Fair Good Fair. 4': Aquolls Poor Poor Good Poor Good Good Fair Good Fair. Aquepts Poor Poor Good Poor Good Good Fair Good Fair. 5, 6 Good Good Fair Fair Poor Very poor Good Very poor Fair. Ascalon . 7 Fair Good Fair Fair Poor Very poor Fair Very poor Fair . Ascalon 8, 9 Good ,Good Fair Fair Poor Very poor Good Very poor Fair. Ascalon 10 Poor Fair Fair Fair Poor Very poor Fair Very poor Fair. Bankard 11 , 12 Good Good Fair Fair Poor Very poor Good Very poor Fair. Bresser 13 Very poor Very poor Fair Fair Very poor Very poor Poor Very poor Fair. Cascajo 14, 15 Good Good Fair Fair Poor Very poor Good Very poor Fair. Colby 16, 17 Fair Good Fair Fair Poor Very poor Fair Very poor Fair. Colby 18k: Colby Fair Good Fair Fair Poor Very poor Fair Very poor Fair. Adena Fair Good Fair Fair Poor Very poor Fair Very poor Fair. 19, 20 Good Good Fair Fair Poor Very poor Good Very poor Fair. Colombo - 21 , 22 Good Good Fair Fair Poor Very poor Good Very poor Fair. Dacono 23, 24 Good Good Fair Fair Poor Very poor Good Very poor Fair. Fort Collins 25, 26 Good Good Fair Fair Poor Very poor Good Very poor Fair. Haverson — 27 Fair Fair Poor Poor Poor Poor Fair Poor Poor. Heldt 28 Fair Fair Poor Poor Poor Very poor Fair Very poor Poor. Heldt 29 Good Good Fair Fair Poor Very poor Good ;Very poor Fair. Julesburg 30 Good Good Fair Fair Poor Very poor Good ;Very poor Fair. — Julesburg See footnotes at end of table. 20 8450 - 124 SOIL SURVEY TABLE 12.--ENGINEERING PROPERTIES AND CLASSIFICATIONS - [The symbol C means less than; > means greater than. Absence of an entry means data were not estimated] Classification Frag- Percentage passing Soil name and Depth USDA texture ments sieve number-- Liquid Pies- -- map symbol Unified PASHTO > 3 limit ticity inches 4 10 40 200 index In Pct Pct 1 , 2 0-10 Loam CL-ML A-4 0 90-100 85-100 60-95 50-75 20-30 5-10 - Altvan 10-25 Clay loam, loam CL A-6, A-7 0 95-100 95-100 85-100 70-80 35-50 15-25 25-60 Sand and gravel SF, SP-SM A-1 0 75-95 70-90 25-35 0-10 --- NP 3*: Aquolls 0-48 Variable --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 48-60 Sand, gravelly SP, SP-SM A-1 0-10 60-90 50-70 30-50 0-10 --- NP sand. Aquents 0-48 Variable --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 48-60 Sand and gravel SP, SP-SM A-1 0-10 60-90 50-70 30-50 0-10 --- NP -.4* Aquolls 0-60 Variable --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ; --- Aquepts 0-60 Variable --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- i --- 5, 6, 7 0-8 Sandy loam SM A-2, A-4 0 95-100, 90-100 70-95 25-50 15-25 I NP-5 Ascalon 8-18 Sandy clay loam SC, CL A-6 0 95-100 90-100 80-100 40-55 20-40 10-20 18-60 Sandy loam, SC, A-4, A-6 0 95-100 95-100 75-95 35-65 20-40 5-15 sandy clay SM-SC, loam, fine CL, sandy- loam. CL-ML 9, 9 0-8 Loam SM A-2, A-4 0 95-100 90-100 70-95 25-50 15-25 NP-5 Ascalon 8-18 Sandy clay loam SC, CL A-6 0 95-100 90-100 80-100 40-55 20-40 10-20 18-60 Sandy loam, SC, A-4, A-6 0 95-100 95-100 75-95 35-65 20-40 5-15 sandy clay SM-SC, loam, fine CL, sandy loam. CL-ML -. 10 0-4 Sandy loam SM A-2, A-4 0 95-100 90-100 60-70 30-40 --- NP 9ankard , 4-60 Fine sand, sand, SP-SM, SM A-2, 0-5 70-100 60-100 40-70 5-25 --- NP gravelly sand. A-3, A-1 - 11 , 12 0-16 Sandy loam SM A-1 , A-2 0 95-100 75-100 35-50 20-35 15-25 NP-5 Presser 16-25 Sandy clay loam SC A-2, 0 95-100 75-100 50-70 30-50 30-55 10-25 A-6, A-7 25-30 Sandy loam, SC, SM-SC A-2, A-1 0 90-100 60-100 30-60 20-30 25-35 5-15 coarse sandy loam, gravelly sandy loam. 30-60 Loamy coarse SP-SC A-2, A-1 0-5 ,80-100 35-85 20-50 5-10 20-30 5-10 sand, gravelly loamy sand, very gravelly loamy sand. 13 0-9 Gravelly sandy GM A-1 , A-2 0-15 150-65 50-60 15-40 10-35 --- NP Cascajo loam. 9-31 Very gravelly GP-GM, A-1 0-15 115-50 15-50 5-30 0-20 --- NP sandy loam, GP, GM very gravelly loamy sand, very gravelly sand. 31-60 Very gravelly GP, SP, A-1 0-15 10-60 10-60 5-30 0-10 --- NP loamy sand, GP-GM, very gravelly SP-SM sand, gravelly sand. See footnote at end of table. 920459 WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, SOUTHERN PART 129 TABLE 13.--PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF SOILS [The symbol < means less than; > means greater then. The erosion tolerance factor (T) is for the entire profile. Absence of an entry means data were not available or were not estimated) I Risk of corrosion Erosion Wind — Soil name and Depth Permea- Available Soil Salinity Shrink- 1 factors erodi- map symbol bility water reaction swell ;Uncoated Concrete bility capacity potential ; steel K_ T group_ In In/hr In/in Pil Mmhos/cm i —T 1, 2 0-10 0.6-2.0 0.20-0.24 6.6-7.8 --- ;Low ;Moderate Low 0.24 3 5 Altvan 10-25 0.6-2.0 0.15-0.17 7.4-8.4 <2 ;Moderate ;Moderate Low 0.28 25-60 >20 0.02-0.04 7.4-9.0 <2 :Low ;Moderate Low 0.10 3*: Aquolls 0-48 ___ ___ ___ ___ I 48-60 >20 0.04-0.06 7.4-8.4 2-16 ILow :High Moderate --- Aquents 0-48 ___ ___ ___ ___ 48-60 >20 0.04-0.06 7.4-8.4 2-16 ILow ;High Moderate --- 4*: Aquolls 0-60 ___ ___ ___ ___ I Aquepts 0-60 ___ ___ ___ ___ 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 0-8 0.6-6.0 0. 11-0.16 6.6-7.8 <2 Low ILow Low 0.17 5 3 Ascalon 8-18 0.6-2.0 0.13-0.15 6.6-7.8 - <2 Moderate ;Moderate Low 0.24 18-60 0.6-6.0 0.11-0.15 7.9-8.4 <2 Low ,Moderate Low 0.24 - 10 0-4 2.0-6.0 0.09-0.12 7.4-8.4 <2 Low :Moderate Low 0. 10 5 3 Bankard 4-60 6.0-20 0.05-0.08 7.4-8.4 <2 Low Moderate Low 0.10 11 , 12 0-16 0.6-6.0 0.11-0.13 6.1-7.3 --- Low Low Low 0.10 5 2 Bresser 16-25 0.6-2.0 0.15-0.18 6.6-7.3 --- Low Moderate Low 0.15 25-30 0.6-6.0 0.10-0.13 6.6-7.3 --- Low Low Low 0.10 30-60 2.0-20 0.05-0.08 6.6-7.3 --- Low Low Low 0. 10 13 0-9 2.0-6.0 0.07-0.09 7.4-8.4 <2 Low Moderate Low 0. 10 5 I 8 Cascajo 9-31 6.0-20 0.05-0.08 7.4-8.4 <2 Low Moderate Low 0.10 31-60 6.0-20 0.05-0.06 7.4-8.4 <2 Low Moderate Low 0.10 14, 15, 16, 17 0-7 0.6-2.0 0.20-0.24 6.6-8.4 <2 Low Moderate Low 0.37 5 4L Colby 7-60 0.6-2.0 0.17-0.22 7.4-8.4 <2 Low Moderate Low 0.37 18*: Colby 0-7 0.6-2.0 0.20-0.24 6.6-8.4 <2 Low Moderate Low 0.37 5 4L 7-60 0.6-2.0 0.17-0.22 7.4-8.4 <2 Low Moderate Low 0.37 _ Adena 0-6 0.6-2.0 0.18-0.21 6.6-7.8 <2 Low Moderate Low 0.37, 5 5 6-9 0.06-0.2 0.16-0.18 6.6-7.8 <2 High High Low 0.24 9-60 0.6-2.0 0.16-0.18 7.4-8.4 <2 Low High Low 0.32 19, 20 0-14 0.6-2.0 0.14-0.18 7.4-8.4 <2 Low High Low 0.32 5 5 _ Colombo 14-21 0.6-2.0 0.14-0.16 7.4-8.4 <2 Moderate High Low 0.28 21-60 0.6-2.0 0.14-0.16 7.4-8.4 <2 Low High Low 0.28 21 , 22 0-12 0.2-0.6 0.19-0.21 6.6-7.8 <2 Moderate Moderate Low 0.24 3 p 5 Dacono 12-21 0.2-0.6 0. 15-0.21 7.4-8.4 <2 High High Low 0.24 21-27 0.2-2.0 0.13-0.18 7.4-8.4 <2 Moderate High Low 0.15 27-60 >20 0.03-0.05 7.4-8.4 <2 Low High Low 0. 10 23, 24 0-7 0.6-2.0 0.16-0.20 6.6-7.8 <2 Low Moderate Low 0.20 5 6 Fort Collins 7-11 0.6-2.0 0.16-0.18 7.4-7.8 <2 Moderate Moderate Low 0.20 __ 11-60 0.6-2.0 0.16-0. 18 7.4-8.4 <2 Low High Low 0.20 25, 26 0-4 0.6-2.0 0.14-0. 18 6.6-8.4 <8 Low High Low 0.28 5 4L Haverson 4-60 0.6-2.0 0.14-0.18 7.4-8.4 <8 Low High Low 0.28 — 27, 28 0-60 0.06-0.6 0.12-0.17 7.9-9.0 <8 High High High 0.28 5 4 Heldt See footnote at end of table. 920450 132 SOIL SURVEY TABLE 14.--SOIL AND WATER FEATURES - [Absence of an entry indicates the feature is not a concern. See text for descriptions of symbols and such terms as "rare," "brief," and "perched." The symbol < means less than; > means greater than] Flooding ; High water table ; Bedrock ' Soil name and Hydro- ' ' ' ' ' Potential map symbol logic Frequency ; Duration ;Months : Depth : Kind ;Months ;Depth;Hard- frost _ group . ; ; ness action : Ft ; : In : 1 , 2 : B None ; --- : --- : >6.0 ; --- --- ; >60 ; --- Moderate. Altvan : ; ; : : : , I , • 3*; r ; I 1 1 , Aquolls : D ;Frequent---- Brief :Apr-Jun:0.5-1.0:Apparent:Apr-Jun; >60 ; --- ;High. 1 I I I I , Aquents : D ;Frequent---- Brief ;Apr-Jun:0.5-1.0:Apparent:Apr—Jun; >60 : --- ;High. I : I , I 4*: i ; ; I ; : ; ' Aquolls : D ;Frequent----,Brief ;Apr-Jun:0.5-1.5:Apparent:Apr-Jun: >60 : --- High. Aquepts ; D Frequent----;Brief :Apr-Jun:0.5-1.5 Apparent;Apr-Jun; >60 ; --- ,High. I I I I ; I 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 : B None ; --- ; --- : >6.0 --- --- : >60 : --- ;Moderate. Ascalon ; : ; : : , 10 ; A Frequent---- Brief ;Mar-Jun: >6.0 ; --- --- ; >60 : --- :Low. Bankard : I ; , : : - 11 , 12 ; B None ; --- ; --- >6.0 --- ; --- 1 >60 : --- ;Moderate. Bresser : : ; : : ; ; ; I 13 A :None : --- : --- : >6.0 : --- ; --- ; >60 : --- :Low. Cascajo , ; : : I : I I ; , 14, 15, 16, 17----: B :None : : --- : >6.0 : --- ; --- , >60 ; --- ;Low. Colby I I : ; I ; : ; : 18*: ; ; : : : ; ; ; ; : - Colby : B ;None ; --- ; --- : >6.0 : --- I --- >60 ; --- ;Low• , I 1 , Adena 1 C :None : --- : --- ; >6.0 ; --- --- >60 : --- :Low. 19, 20 : B :Rare ; --- I --- : >6.0 ; --- --- >60 1 --- ;Moderate. - Colombo ; : : ; I : 21 , 22 ; C :None : --- : --- ; >6.0 ; --- --- >60 : --- :Low. Dacono ; ; ; I : ; : —_ 23, 24 : B :None to rare --- ; --- >6.0 : --- --- ; >60 : --- ;Low. Fort Collins : : : : : : 25, 26 : B ;Rare to Brief ;May-Sep >6.0 : --- ; --- ; >60 I --- ;Low. Haverson ; common. : : : 27, 28 1 C :None --- : --- >6.0 : --- ; --- : >60 ; --- :Low. Heldt : , •• , _ 29, 30 A :None --- --- >6.0 : --- : --- : >60 : --- ;Moderate. Julesburg : 31 , 32, 33, 34----: B :None --- : --- >6.0 --- : --- 1 >60 : --- :Low. Kim : : I : , • 35* Loup D ;Rare to Brief :Mar-Jun,+.5-1.5:Apparent:Nov-May: >60 , --- Moderate. common. ; Boel , A Occasional Brief mar-Jun; 1 .5-3.5;Apparent:Nov-May; >60 : --- Moderate. __ ; : 36*: ; : 1 Midway , D :None --- --- >6.0 1 --- --- ;10-20;Rip- ,Low. : pable: See footnote at end of table. 92045O I' d.JJL (Main cSan.i.E / h afion ishicL rcS(('aint cSan) boo Linztatl cSitEEL 9ELEJShonc G)U1tE O (303) 716-9570 Longmont, CO 80501 February 25, 1992 Mr. LaVern C. Nelson, P.E. Nelson Engineers 822 7th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Re: Jack E. and Marjorie J. Edson property - Commitment to Serve Dear Vern: This letter is in reference to the following described real property: NW/4 of the NW/4 of Section 10, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado -- approximately 40 acres. Referenced property can immediately be served. A major trunk line is available along the North side of Colorado Highway 119 contiguous thereto. The property is within the District. St. Vrain Sanitation District has 1852 SFE (single family equivalent) taps, of which 288 have been purchased, resulting in 1564 available for purchase. These taps are available to referenced property and other eligible properties on a first-come, first-serve basis. As the present supply of taps is consumed, the District plans to increase the size of its treatment plant to serve 5,555 SFE taps. These additional taps would also be made available on a first-come, first-serve basis. The above-referenced property is eligible to utilize the available supply of taps on a first-come, first-serve basis, subject to the following: a. Installation of off-site lateral and/or connection to the District' s system by the applicant; b. Execution of a Service Agreement; c. Purchase and payment of the required number of taps; and d. Compliance with the District's Rules and Regulations. Should this property wish to obtain an absolute commitment to serve, taps may be prepurchased and held until needed. Monthly service charges will be assessed 929 rank Mr. LaVern C. Nelson, P.E. Nelson Engineers January 25, 1992 Page 2 upon completion of construction or twelve months after purchase, whichever comes first. Should you have any questions concerning this matter, do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, ST. VRAIATI0N DISTRICT n2L ' L. D. Lawson, P.E. Manager LDL:jls 91450 \ REc8cnrPo2 "` NITER ii _ POWER UNITED POWER, INCORPORATED P.O. BOX:929, BRIGHTON,CO 80601 TELEPHONE:(303)659-0551 • 1-800-468-8809 FAX (303)659-2172 February 28, 1992 Mr. Vern Nelson, P.E. Nelson Engineers — 822 7th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Vern: SUBJECT: Edson P.U.D. I have reviewed the location map of the Edson property to determine that it is located within our service area. This letter is to confirm that United Power does provide electrical service to the subject property. There is an existing overhead three-phase electrical line along the west side of the property. The property could readily be serviced from that line. The line is available with capacity for industrial and commercial customers. We support the proposed rezoning and we look forward to the development of this site as an important part of economic development in southwest Weld County. Sincerely, UNITED POWER, INC. _ 03:_e_t Bill Meier I-25 District Representative BM:asb A CONSUMER OWNED UTILITY 92045 RELCEib Post Office Box 210, Niwot, CO 80544-0210 If NO If wnr e a oisTa� (303) 652-2188, Metro (303) 443-2036 February 27 , 1992 Nelson Engineers Greeley National Plaza 822 7th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Re: Jack E. and Marjorie J. Edson TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN This letter is to confirm that the property along Colorado Highway 119 is within the service boundary of the Left Hand Water District, however, this does not necessarily guarantee that water service is available for the property. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to phone. Sincerely, E. ayne Wentworth, P. E. District Engineer /rr 920450 REC iV 'FEB28 92 MOUNTAIN VIEW FIRE PRA . ECTION DISTRICT //�„ Administrative Office: htt„f,J 700 Weaver Park Road • Longmont, CO 80501 �� l\ (303) 772-0710 Metro (303) 666-4404 February 26, 1992 Nelson Engineers 822 7th Street — Greeley,Co 80631 RE: EDSON REZONING To whom it may concern; The Mountain View Fire Protection District does provide service to the property located at Stale Highway 119 and just East of Weld County Road 7. Please note that all requirements of the Uniform Fire Code will have to be met when the property is developed, which includes adequate fire flows for fire protection. If you have any questions or comments please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Mi GA_ A• 4 Division Chief Fire Prevention Station 5 Station 6 Station 7 Station 3 Station 4 P.O.Box 666 P O.Box 40 Station 1 Station 2 P.O.Box N 10911 Dobbin Run 100 So.Forest Si 9110 Longmont,C Rd. ton I an. 17 P.O.Bm 9529g Palmet Ave. 8W0 Mwot Road Lafa ette.CO 600 Briggs 8050 CO Lon80A,CO Mead.CO 80542 Ntwo CO 00544 80026 Erie,CO 80516 9204500&Ono.CO 80514 eo5ot Hello