HomeMy WebLinkAbout920697.tiff CHANGE ORDER
CHANGE ORDER NO. 1
DATE: 7-29-92
PROJECT: 1992 SEAL COAT PROJECT
TO (CONTRACTOR) : Thompson Valley Sealcoat Co.
JUSTIFICATION: Cul-De-Sac Extension-Add Antelope Hill
Subdivision To The Contract.
You are directed to make the following changes in the work. All other terms and
conditions of the Contract not expressly modified hereby shall remain in full
force and effect.
ITEM NO, DESCRIPTION EST. OTY, UNIT UNIT COST AMOUNT
ALT.N0.2 Sealcoat 41,056.89 Sq. Yd. .4570 $18,763.00
The original Contract sum was $ 199,968. 11
Net change by previous change orders $ 0
The Contract sum prior to this Change Order was $ 199,968. 11
The Contract sum will be (increased) ( ) or
(• ) by this Change Order $ 18,763.00
The Contract sum including this Change Order will
be $ 218,731.11
The new Contract time will be (increased) ( ) or ( ) by
Twenty ( 20 ) days.
The date of completion as of the date of this Change Order is therefore
August 15 , 19 92 .
ACCEPTED BY: ORDERED BY:
Thompson Valley Sealcoat Co. THE BOARD OF WELD COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Contractor Address: P. 0. Box 758
Gree ey, CO 80632
P.O. Box 5259
ss By X
Lovela d Co. , Chairr n o the Board
By � L%II' Date OUP /i,cd,o 3 l99
Date
25
92O697
Eo �?��I cc ' K G1 PL1
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
REVIEW/WORK SESSION REQUEST
1992 SEALCOAT PROJECT CHANGE ORDER
DEPARTMENT: Engineering DATE: Jul 2 992
PERSON REQUESTING: Drew Scheltinga, County Engineer
Brief description of the problem/issue:
The 1992 Sealcoat Project was awarded to Thompson Valley Sealcoat Company in
the amount of $199,968.11. The project is underway and Thompson Valley has
done a very good job. There are four aspects to the job that would run over
the base contract which are described as follows:
Cul-de-sacs: The contractor noticed in subdivisions containing cul-de-sacs
they were using excessive material to cover the square yardage indicated in our
bid packet. We examined our computations and found we multiplied the length
of the cul-de-sac times the normal street width but did not provide for the
full circle. We need to add $8,524.00 to the contract to provide for this
overrun.
Antelove Hills: Antelope Hills was chip sealed last year and therefore not
included in this year's sealcoat program. However, we are experiencing a
severe chip loss. If we perform the sealcoat this year, it will help to bond
the chips and save our investment. The additional cost for Antelope Hills
would be $4,710.00.
Parking Area: The parking area around the Engineering and Road & Bridge
building has never been surface treated. The majority of the asphalt has been
in place for 10 years. Sealcoating at this time would be a maintenance
investment. The cost would be $3,341.00.
Fuel Site: The fuel site northwest of the Engineering and Road & Bridge
building would also be in line for a sealcoat as a preventative maintenance
effort. The cost would be $2,188.00.
What options exist for the Board? (Include consequences, impacts, costs, etc.
of options) :
Where the cul-de-sacs are concerned, our computations were in error and the
contractor is due the 4 percent overrun of $8,524.00.
Antelope Hills, the parking area, and the fuel site are optional additions to
the sealcoat project.
We have eliminated four miles of 59th Avenue on the chip seal contract
anticipating an overlay in next year's program. The savings there will more
than balance the total of $18,763 for all four projects. That would be a 9
percent increase to the present contract.
920697
Recommendation to the Board:
I recommend adding Antelope Hills to the contract to save the investment we
have in the chip seal.
The parking area and the fuel site are long-term maintenance projects that I
think are worthwhile.
Thompson Valley Sealcoat Company has been performing very well. Also, we have
a unit price of,457 cents per square yard which is very reasonable because we
have a substantial contract and would not be able to get that unit price on
small projects. Therefore, increasing the contract would be a timely purchase.
Initial:
Approve Schedule
Recommendation Work Session Other
Lacy
Kennedy
Kirby
Harbert v
Webster
DS/gb:tvsc
cc: George Goodell, Director, Road & Bridge
Dave Becker, Assistant Director, Road & Bridge
92069'
Hello