The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About931642.tiff . 1111. . I‘1:1 tc:SP 11- 1 •Q CLERK TO THE BOARD P.O. BOX 758 I GREELEY,COLORADO 80632 (303)3584000 EXT.4225 C. COLORADO July 23, 1993 Parcel No. : 095915401016 PIN No. : 2551986 I MILLER GREGORY B & SHERRIE M 2405 49TH AVENUE COURT GREELEY, CO 80634 Dear Petitioner(s) : The Weld County Board of Equalization, pursuant to Colorado law, has authority to hear petitions for appeal from persons whose objections to or protests of excessive, erroneous, or illegal valuation have been refused or denied by the County Assessor. However, for tax year 1993, the County Board of Equalization may hear only those matters which were received or postmarked on or before July 15, 1993. Your petition was received in our office after July 15, 1993. Therefore, the County Board of Equalization does not have jurisdiction to hear your appeal and thus, your petition is dismissed. Very truly yours, BOAND OFEQU IZAT ON Donald D. Warden, Clerk to the Board BY: 44,4,x�� Carol A. Harding, Deputy cc: Warren Lasell, Assessor 931642 -'c Q- COUNTY ASSESSOR 1400 NORTH 17th AVE. GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 NOTICE OF ADJUSTMENT PHONE (303) 353-3845, EXT. 3656 IGR 2H2-9 L9 BLK2 HIGHLAND PARK 2ND C. %240 5 49 AV CT% COLORADO • 2405 49 AVCT GREELKY OWNER MILLER GREGORY B IC SHERRIE M MILLER GREGORY B C SHERRIE N PARCEL 395915401016 PIN R 2551986 2405 49 AV CT YEAR 1993 GREELEY CO 80634 LOG 01476 05/24/1993 The appraised value of property is based on the appropriate consideration of the approaches to value required by law. The Assessor has determined that your property should be included in the following category(ies): RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY IS VALUED BY CONSIDERING THE MARKET APPROACH. AGRICULTURAL LAND VALUE IS DETERMINED SOLELY BY THE EARNING OR PRODUCTIVE CAPACITY OF THE LAND, CAPITALIZED AT A RATE SET BY LAW, ALL OTHER PROPERTY, INCLUDING VACANT LAND, IS VALUED BY CONSIDERING THE COST, MARKET, AND INCOME APPROACHES. If your concern is the amount of your property tax, local taxing authorities (county, city, fire protection, and other special districts) hold budget hearings in the fall.Please refer to your tax bill or ask your Assessor for a listing of these districts,and plan to attend these budget hearings. The Assessor has carefully studied all available information, giving particular attention to the specifics included on your protest and has deter- mined the valuation(s) assigned to your property. The reasons for this determination of value are: BASED ON A STUDY OF COMPARABLE PROPERTIES THAT SOLD FROM 1/1 /91 TO 6/30/92 WE HAVE ADJUSTED YOUR PROPERTY TO THE 1993 LEVEL OF VALUE AS SHOWN BELOW. / i. ` /; r J } ` 4/4 'NER'S ASSESSOR'S VALUATION PROPERTY t IATE ACTUAL VALUE ACTUAL VALUE LUE PRIOR TO REVIEW AFTER REVIEW 1 LAND 17, 000 17,000 IMPS (; bS,i?00 601766 •TOTALS $ $ 821000$ 77, 766 If you disagree with the Assessor's decision,you have the right to appeal to the County Board of Equalization for further consideration, 39-8-106(1)(a),C.R.S. Please see the back of this form for detailed information on filing your appeal. By: WARREN L. LASELL O6/O9/93 WELD COUNTY ASSESSOR DATEtl 15-OPT AR Form PR-207-87/93 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON REVERSE SIDE YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO APPEAL.THE ASSESSows DECISION Pc.ii ,,, =r r.r4 of Equalization will sit to hear.a The er property nand E buildings) appeals beginning July-1 and continuing thrum August 10 for 39-F , '-i r, and personal y: ,, tr, ty (furnishings. machinery,. and equipment). 39-8-104 and S. APPEAL Ort( a FnU a.S: t you choose to awed] the Assessor's decision,ion, mail or delver one copy of: tI is completed Ion Ione Ir. the County Board ' qu .rn. preserve your right to appeal. your appeal must be POSTMARKED OP , . I ., : s, 15 FOR REAL PRPEEBTY, i NL`s.,3Ui_'( 20 FOR PERSONAL PRoPEr UPFLB COUNTY BOARD Of e i3U1 + • " 915 Inth Street 2,0 Boy 7E;r3 < ._ _ _ priculey, 80Mrado 80632 Telephone (203) 356 4000, Fp u7d5 NCt. °CATIOfi OF.HE�ARfNC: _._. ... . r You gni = notified of tss the time and place set for the hearing of your appeal. C 00 ' . I BOARD OF EQUALIZATION'S DETE;RMINA"TIO3N: The County Board of Equalization must make a decision on your appeal and mail you a determination within five busineus days, The e County Board must conclude their hearings by August 10. 3AxaAt5,3 EIGHTS'FOR FURTHER APPEALS:' 'f .t) „a° satisfied v;th the County r3oard of Equaiizgfion'sdecis on, f ( , f - r adi ,., e r.,' 1 y: % earns[ I a'ulfhrn thirty , o¢tttt ��,url(r �a6r�(ton's w.rrtfr=;r� decision w� �a�t3�iE!, a€f�.e,�ciiororaw�e : Board of Assessment A R r"2ge,�9��rTAA} _ _C!n ,ci tris CAA at 1313 Sherman, Room 3 LP Devour, lt.,ro r 80204 t31 ' District Court: 9th Avenue vne ton tr; P.O. Box tt Greeley 3o4pade 8063 Telephone (30k3r 35u 40e } Ext. 4920 . . WELD POBBTY ('s( ! Lei✓ OF o- QUA'_.i4 A01C) 915 10th Street, P.O. Box 758 Greeley, ` P= 505'2 Telephone +':3031 356-4000, Ext. 4225 If you de t([ reiceive fli determination from the County Board of Equalization. you must tile an apneei with the Bud of1,35,5ymicent Appegiu 6Septemher 20. TO PRESERVE YOUR APPEAL RIGHTS, YOU MUST PROVE YOU HAVE FILED A TIMELY APPEAL; THEREFORE, WE RECOMMEND ALL CORRESPONDENCE BE MAILED WITH PROOF OF MAILING, PETITION TO THE COUNTY BOARD OF EQUALIZATION In the =pace below, please explain why you disagree with the Assessor's valuation, IN ACCORDANCE WITH 39.8-106{1.5}, C.R.w.; YOU MUST STATE, YOUR OPINION OF VALUE iN TERMS OF A SPECIFIO DOLLAR AMOUNT. Attach additional documents as necessary„ M� re 44, c2 05 (fqn Age- C.t) I;cs on +tic silt a FE`)k 14-j, }(ills%rC Qh d is d-ke one_ oil +4e. very/ .J 2s t.}e.tc.c s FL+ ha3 q c(t r-+- nr r). O. A Ito con, 4 VV J . ES .�'- '/ex+re.�-� y u,„_- k.(�� +0 Ce.+�pri prix- u h Sal c..5.5 O h .5Q ' OI I .�.r 5214T. W n.5 (✓1 t t Eke, /1�('I$ 0.1" {.. (1,Qd e_ b. CJ r r.v 4 ,}G.nC�. 4! Pwl \et IA�2 ,„1- even 9 ,/pc 5 ewer" �MvLayt- / W r' ° p 'r a ✓O✓y26 d.:rf w,.,.d �*�r.�"es 1l.•.,vq -I-r�...c�.e.-S. /3{sa an. v. i.crensp Er7-- 1(1 (0o t 2odd ✓14.d(y wts�ky/si'i t4(2 le, W--_W (se- Leak;- F c a vaf�-1-t- d / [ ° g / II(uJ[n� �I�wlylJi/(/'}I^SJJ_Y� qq on wro r.� �r¢� O0I� AS -F � We Pa.c��J�ijObo -�. .f-f+e. hevre. / G.(�. 7-13-Y3 r N ° E / COdF -. 0 �I.» O O> CC I-y tic ` ti.: N TO N )' d0J ° w > > CV U- _ •N- G ref r Q M > 2 a, t m 6 C W Oa :J a N ' 0_ C0901C, LL: 02 L$�,, a S J 'a m o.0 a a, `('K 3 v 0 C) m a9 Ct NCB •.r E X 9 N ig O N_ O]Z a Z a y 7-5 A I- '5 `E y O 01 coc (AN J ti, « N M Cr O.1/1 a «S.-v" 9 0'lW H) N ma +r < N N >X r_ ° 0f iv, V t,'O OI - c 0 m J O N 7, N 0)to S O j - :Y F SomN • aQ °my .. .. 0 5 gm w 'O N w H D c 0. •G M a '0 LL W x a a s 01 0 NI En E c V p 2, as yc, to •GO > in C r;} ate• >. N ° N •.a 61FyS 2C NZ j o.E fNf�ll .�-' CuF U) a) ca '" CO---0 N N CO Cn r fn is 0 WOW ciao a m° D 0 'L-' d C -0 cu Rf>1noto —. a a 0 w ? c XN cc ,dit ,.a!noa NN E < ° ° • comma mfa...0 HY -'4 -t 0 CI S. a 3'u; C o =0 i' -1 M c P u r,I 0 -I V?Ji P.- Wg - PC T J alc. >J I; N+ r r1 4 (? .1 J 4 U , v :, ab. ap n a` • F g X0 #: rso n g.,, a ,7, ._....D a s o C V4..,R. N -I,r €5 Ir h.M re cit.. ₹ v p it . .. 0 N a. N x'101 nu. 4 *_ R t: n 8 0 6S ., is i 3 $ C m vur 4 7 -t':r re N � 13 CJ A. i ; a m Ui 0 C? N M if, O I ir�. r w N :le NCt J c 7 Q `:: eQ,. . Z c �� JaIt © 1 « t:, tMJ /X 9J x +0 , r J I U Y 4 G $:.. C7 ,..“•••• I-. �- .s 16Q' 0' : r D. U Cr O- 4 O Y 1 -t 2t.T a ��y 'J I it k, t J `J 's'J r z ., ,`�V a a 3 , _ _, r }'. '3/fpya 44-stL-" : mEmoRAnDum Wilk Board of County Commissioners DateJuly 29 , 1993 COLORADO rom Lee D. Morrison, Assistant County Attorney Chere' Miller, Parcel # 095915401016, PIN 2551986, Subject: Phone 330-6314 Ms . Miller called Mr. Warden and then I spoke with her on July 28, 1993 . She failed to timely file her Motion for Appeal of a Real Property Assessment. She asserts that her failure to file by the 15th was due to her misinterpretation of what was personal property versus real property. She felt her house was "personal" to herself and, therefore, she could file by the 20th. The Clerk then sent a notice rejecting the appeal and, despite me explaining that her remedies would be to court, to arbitration, or to state hearing, she requests that the Clerk overlook her failure to timely file. I suggested that she write a letter asking that the Board not hold her to the statutory requirements and hear her case despite her failure to properly invoke the jurisdiction of the Board. She may write such a letter. On July 29, 1993, Ms . Miller again appeared wanting to see Mr. Warden and present her evidence. I advised her that Mr. Warden was not in a position to "just put it in another pile" so that it could be heard. I again told her of her remedies including sending a letter to the Board or a state appeal . She was upset with this and told me I was against her. LDM/gb:chere (7_3/&/,2 Hello