HomeMy WebLinkAbout940384.tiff FORM 920(66-93) ITION FOR ABATEMENT OR REFUND OF TAXF' &a2 G 4/..- 77j
Mus filed In duplicate and all questions must answered.
Petitioners: Complete this side only. ppp , r( ,
GREELEY , Colorado, MARCH 2. , 19 9L �/t
City or Town
To The Honorable Board of Commissioners of WELD County
Gentlemen:
The petition of SNYDER OIL CORPORATION
whose mailing address is: % KEN E ANDREWS & CO P 0 BOX 489
SEAGOVILLE TEXAS 75159 •
City or Town ' state Zip Code .. -
SCHEDULE NUMBER DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY AS LISTED ON TAX ROLL.
0248293 LEASEHOLD INT NE4NE4 8 3 66
(EISENACH & PRESTON 8-1K)
respectfully requests that the taxes assessed against the above property for the years A.D.
19 -, 19__, are erroneous, illegal, or due to error in valuation for the following reasons:
Describe specifically the circumstances surrounding the incorrect value or tax, including owner's
estimate of value. (Attach additional sheets if necessary)
FULL VALUE FOR BOTH WELLS #0099792 (EISENACH & PRESTON 8-8K)
AND #0248293 (EISENACH & PRESTON 8-1K) WERE ASSESSED ON #0248293
FOR 1993.
so. >
_m
K'O
N L,o
n
w a
en -rr
ay,
—V x T
—
cS CJ A
Z N
19 93 19
Value Tax Value Tax
Orig. 377700 $27431.60
Abate. _1.8.8.25.D____1_3_7_15._.40_
Bal. 188850 13715.80
Therefore the petitioner requests that the taxes may be abated or refunded in the sum of $ 13715.80
I declare,under penalty of perjury in the second degree that this petition,together with any accompanying
exhibits or statements, has been examined by me and to the best of my knowledge, information and belief
is true, correct and complete.
Address
Petitioner
By (Cw4--54.11.47--
-3 34//9' Daytime phone number -7/ 8 ? — 3O 5.7
�� Agent
Every petition for abatement or refund filed pursuant to section 39-10-114 shall be acted upon pursuant
to the provisions of this section by the board of county commissioners or the assessor, as appropriate, within
six months of the date of filing such petition. 39-1-113(1.7), C.R.S.
riIAA - `'</
��. HOECKELS-Denver.CO—WW1/48
Complete Either Section I or Section II • _ _ _
RESO.,.iTION OF COUNTY COMMISSIONL.
Section 1: In accordance with 39-1-113(1.5) C.R.S., the commissioners of
County authorize the assessor to review petitions for abatement or refund and to settle by written mutual
agreement any such petition for abatement or refund in an amount of one thousand dollars or less per tract,
parcel, or lot of land or per schedule of personal property.
County Commission Resolution #
The assessor and petitioner mutually agree to an assessed value of $ for
$ total tax for the year(s) 19 and an abatement/refund of $
Petitioner's Signature Date Assessor's Signature Date
If Section I is not complete and/or if petition is for more than $1,000, Section II must be completed.
Section II: Assessors's recommendation:
approved;❑ approved in part $ ❑ denied for the following reason(s)
See attached memorandum.
((ha , 7''�2ti�1 c X C By:
Assessor ✓/ Dep.Assessor
WHEREAS, The County Commissioners of Weld County,
State of Colorado, at a duly and lawfully called regular meeting held on the 25th day
of April , A.D. 19 94 , at which meeting there were present the following
members: Chairman W, H. Webster and Commissioners Dale K. Hall. George E. Baxter,
Constance L. Harbert, and Barbara J. Kirkmeyer
notice of such meeting and an opportunity to be present having been given to the taxpayer and the
Assessor of said County and said Assessor Warren Lasell. present. and taxpayer
Snyder Oil Corporation not being represent(erand not being present; and
(name)
WHEREAS, The said County Commissioners have carefully considered the within application, and
are fully advised in relation thereto,
NOW BE IT RESOLVED, That the Board concurs with the recommendation of
(concurs or does not concur)
the assessor and the petition be _ approved , and an abatement refund be allowed
(approved or denied) (be allowed or not be allowed)
on an assessed valuation of $ 188.850.00 for $ 13,71 5 80 total tax for the year(s) 19 93 .
1 .
hairman of Bo d of County Commissioners
STATE OF COLORADO,
ss.
County of Weld
Donald D. Warden , RInfiC d 1&ggx fi Clerk of the
Board of County Commissioners in and for the County of Weld
State of Colorado, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing order is truly copied from the records
of the proceedings of the Board of County Commissioners for said Weld
County, now in my office.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of said County,
at Greeley, CO. this 27th day of April A.D. 19
County Clerk to Board
By oit((gib /� t?P_[N
Deputy
ACTION OF THE PROPERTY TAX ADMINISTRATOR
Denver, Colorado,S`l/ 1997 .
cThe action of the Board of County Commissioners, relative to the within petition, is hereby
proved;❑ approved in part $ ( ❑ denied for the following reason(s)
'VONA
Secretary • SUAProperty Tax
Administrator
pg.o Colorado Department of Local Affairs
DIVISION OF PROPERTY TAXATION
<77ta o�� Mary E. Huddleston
* Property Tax Administrator
18764?
Roy Romer
Governor
May 9, 1994
Francis Loustalet
Weld County Treasurer
P.O. Box 458
Greeley, CO 80631
RE: Abatement Petition
1993 Real Property Taxes
Weld County Schedule Numbers: 0248293, 0-0099792
DPT Number 62-94-011, 62-94-012
Please be advised that the above two abatement petitions have been
approved by my office and are being returned to the county for
processing. I would like to draw your attention to the abatement
petition for schedule number 0-0099792. The abatement petition has been
processed by the assessor and approved by the county commissioners as an
additional tax as opposed to a reduction in taxes. A note on the face
of the petition indicates that the taxpayer owes an additional $4,814.50
to bring the total tax bill for schedule number 0-0099792 to $13,715.80.
This situation apparently has arisen due to the total 1993
production reported on schedule number 0248293 and 1992 production
carried over on parcel 0-0099792. The production reported on 0248293
should have been divided between the two wells. As a result, one
schedule number should be abated and the other increased. Since
abatements are generally processed for a reduction in taxes, I felt it
necessary to separate this abatement for clarification.
If you have any questions, please contact my office.
Sincerely,
Mary E. Huddleston
Property Tax Administrator
MEH:LF:jr
c: Snyder Oil Corporation
C/0 Ken E. Andrews & Company
P.O. Box 489
Seagoville, Texas 75159
i ii
Mgr
1313 Sherman Street, Room 419, Denver, CO 80203, (303) 866-2371
TDD (303) 866-5300 FAX (303) 866-4000
TO: Weld County Board of Commissioners
FROM: Warren L. Lasell, Weld County Assessor
DATE: April 1, 1994
SUBJECT: Abatement Petitions Dated 3/2/94 for parcels (1) 0248293 and
(2) 0 0099792.
The purposes of this memorandum are to explain the need for the two
petitions, to recommend approval of them, and to suggest procedures to
accomplish the intent of the petitioner.
When submitting declaration schedules in 1993, the agent for the
operator mistakenly credited the production values for two wells (parcel 1,
and parcel 2) to parcel 1. We recorded that value ($377,700) for parcel 1
(0248293) and placed no value on parcel 2. We then carried forward to 1993
the 1992 production value ($122,560) as 1993 production value for parcel 2 (0
0099792) .
The result of these mistakes is that parcel 1 was overvalued by $188,850
parcel 2 was undervalued by $66,290. The agent has shown these discrepancies
on his signed petitions. The net amount the county owes is $8,901.30. I
recommend that the board approve these petitions and return $8,901.30 to
Snyder Oil Corporation.
Suggested procedures for approving the net return of $8,901.30 follow.
For parcel 1 the board should approve the abatement of $13,715.80. To correct
the value for parcel 2, we will add one half of the value originally on parcel
1 ($188,850) and subtract the 1992 production value erroneously carried
forward ($122,560) . We will then submit appropriate documentation to the
treasurer so that he can add $4,814.50 to the 1993 tax bill for Snyder Oil.
The net effect of these two adjustments is that the county will pay $8,901.30
to the Snyder Oil Corporation.
Hello