The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About941258.tiff_ .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. RESOLUTION RE: ACTION OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, CONCERNING SITE APPLICATION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, UNITED STATES AIR FORCE AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board has received a Site Application from the Department of Defense, United States Air Force, do Jack Knudson, Deputy Base Civil Engineer, 300 Vesle Drive, FE Warren Air Force Base, Wyoming 82005-2788, concerning the replacement of a Domestic Wastewater Treatment System, Missile Alert Facility N-01, located on the following described parcel of land, to- wit: Part of the SW% NE'/ of Section 26, Township 8 North, Range 58 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado WHEREAS, the regulations for site applications for domestic wastewater treatment systems require review of the site application by the Board of County Commissioners, and further, that various local and state agencies be given the opportunity to review and comment on said site application, and WHEREAS,the site application from the Department of Defense was submitted to the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County for review and comment, a copy of said application being attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and WHEREAS, after study and review, the Board finds that said site application is compatible with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan, and that it is in the best interest of Weld County to recommend approval of said application. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the site application submitted by the Department of Defense, United States Air Force, do Jack Knudson, Deputy Base Civil Engineer, be, and hereby is, recommended favorably to the Colorado Department of Health, Water Quality Control Division, as being compatible with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that the Chairman be, and hereby is, authorized to sign said site application. 941258 PL0079 LrG' : PL; KnUckson l-IL RE: SITE APPLICATION - DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, U.S.A.F. PAGE 2 The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 14th day of December, A.D., 1994. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: LLA /D �� WELD COUNTY, COLORADO t f ,/M ��(_! Weld County Clerk to the Board 2 Viz. W. H. Webster, Ch irman BY: ter' �",�;7 �� Deputy Clerk to the Board Dale Hall, Pro- em APPROVED AS TO FORM: / C ` .. �_ Ge e . Baxter �- /4/ � X' -2 . (;,ate o� ././ County Attorney Constance L. Harbert thic j Barbara J. Kirkmeyer 941258 PL0079 BEFORE THE WELD COUNTY,COLORADO,PLANNING COMMISSION _0 CLL. . I RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ppe�g� ,, k v (car ea y t tt��UW i o5.9 that the following resolution be introduced for passage by the Weld County Planning Commission. Be it resolved by the Weld County Planning Commission that the application for: CLERK RAE BO/-r DDeparttnent of the U.S.Air Force ADDRESS: 300 Vesle Drive,Suite 800,Building 240,F.E.Warren Air Force Base,Wyoming 82005-2788 REQUEST: Site Application for Replacement of Domestic Wastewater Treatment System,Missile Alert Facility N-01 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the SW4 NE4 of Section 26,T8N,R58W of the 6th P.M.,Weld County,Colorado LOCATION: Approximately 1/2 mile north of Weld County Road 88 and 1/2 mile east of Weld County Road 129. be recommended favorably to the Board of County Commissioners for the following reasons: This request is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan's Public Facility and Service Goals and Policies and Urban Growth Boundary Area goals and policies. The proposed replacement of the existing domestic wastewater treatment system will be efficient and cost effective and will not be a duplication of services. The wastewater treatment system when constructed will have the capacity to serve the Missile Alert facility. This proposal does not appear to have negative impacts on the general health,safety and welfare of the present and future residents of Weld County. The Weld County Health Department and North Front Range Water Quality Protection Association have recommended approval of this proposal. Motion seconded by Judy Yamaguchi. VOTE: For Passage Against Passage Ron Sommer Marie Koolstra Curt Moore Judy Yamaguchi Shirley Camenisch Jack Epple Richard Kimmel The Chairman declared the resolution passed and ordered that a certified copy be forwarded with the file of this case to the Board of County Commissioners for further proceedings. CERTIFICATION OF COPY I,Sharyn Frazer,Recording Secretary for the Weld County Planning Commission,do hereby certify that the above and foregoing resolution,is a true copy of the resolution of the Planning Commission of Weld County,Colorado, adopted on December 6, 1994. Dated the 6th of December, 1994. Sharyn Fr er Secretary 94 125)3 2 5 S DATE: December 6, 1994 NAME: Department of the U.S. Air Force ADDRESS: 300 Vesle Drive, Suite 800, Building 240, F.E. Warren Air Force Base, Wyoming 82005-2788 REQUEST: Site Application for Replacement of Domestic Wastewater Treatment System, Missile Alert Facility N-01 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the SW4 NE4 of Section 26, TSN, R58W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Approximately 1/2 mile north of Weld County Road 88 and 1/2 mile east of Weld County Road 129 THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES' STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THIS REQUEST BE APPROVED FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: This request is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan's Public Facility and Service Goals and Policies and Urban Growth Boundary Area goals and policies. The proposed replacement of the existing domestic wastewater treatment system will be efficient and cost effective and will not be a duplication of services. The wastewater treatment system when constructed will have the capacity to serve the Missile Alert facility. This proposal does not appear to have negative impacts on the general health, safety and welfare of the present and future residents of Weld County. The Weld County Health Department and North Front Range Water Quality Protection Association have recommended approval of this proposal. 941259 SUMMARY OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING December 6, 1994 Page 2 CASE NUMBER:USR-1066 APPLICANT: Paul and Louanne Timm REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a bed and breakfast in the A (Agricultural)zone district. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NE4 of Section 12,T1 IN,R64W of the 6th P.M.,Weld County, Colorado. Paul Timm, applicant explained they want to open their house for a two bedroom bed and breakfast. Judy Yamaguchi asked about shared restroom facilities. Mr.Timm explained the two bedroom bed and breakfast would share a bathroom and the(living)household bathroom facility would be separate. The Chairman asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak for or against this application. No one wished to speak. Jack Epple moved Case Number USR-1066, Paul and Louanne Timm, be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with the Planning Commissions recommendation for approval. Shirley Camenisch seconded the motion. The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Ron Sommer-yes; Marie Koolstra - yes; Curt Moore-yes; Judy Yamaguchi-yes; Shirley Camenisch-yes; Jack Epple -yes;Richard Kimmel-yes. Motion carried unanimously. APPLICANT: Department of the U.S.Air Force REQUEST: Site Application for Replacement of Domestic Wastewater Treatment System,Missile Alert Facility N-01. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the SW4 NE4 of Section 26,T8N,R58W of the 6th P.M.,Weld County,Colorado. Fred Hanson,Engineer,representative for Department of the Air Force,explained the existing septic system(installed in 1963)exceeds capacity and a new one is required. The Chairman asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak for or against this application. No one wished to speak. • Curt Moore moved the application for the Department of the Air Force be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with the Planning Commission's recommendation for approval. Judy Yamaguchi seconded the motion. The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Ron Sommer-yes; Marie Koolstra - yes; Curt Moore -yes; Judy Yamaguchi-yes; Shirley Camenisch-yes; Jack Epple -yes;Richard Kimmel-yes. Motion carried unanimously. CASE NUMBER:USR-1067 APPLICANT: H.S.Resources REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a land treatment facility in the A (Agricultural)zone district. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The SEA of Section 13,T3N,R66W of the 6th P.M.,Weld County,Colorado. LOCATION: Approximately 1/2 mile east of Weld County Road 35;north of and adjacent to Weld County Road 32. 941259 LAND-USE APPLICATION SUMMARY SHEET Date: November 29, 1994 NAME: Department of the U.S. Air Force ADDRESS: 300 Vesle Drive, Suite 800, Bldg. 240, F.E. Warren Air Force Base, Wyoming 82005-2788 REQUEST: Site application for Replacement of Domestic Wastewater Treatment System, Missile Alert Facility N-01 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of SW4NE4 of Section 26, T8N, R58W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Approximately 1/2 mile north of Weld County Road 88 and 1/2 mile east of Weld County Road 129 POSSIBLE ISSUES SUMMARIZED FROM APPLICATION MATERIALS: The Colorado Department of Health, Water Quality Control Commission's regulations require that the applicant submit the site application to all appropriate local governments, planning agencies and state agencies for reviedw and comment prior to submission to the Colorado Department of Health's District Engineers. The regulations further state that if the proposed facility is located in the unincorporated area of a county, the county planning agency should be required to comment upon the relationship of the treatment works to the local long-range comprehensive plan for the area as it affects water quality including the location of the flood plain and capacity to serve the existing facility. The county agency should also comment upon the relationship of the treatment works to the comprehensive plan for the area as it affects water quality for the treatment works to be located within the boundaries of a city or town. The North Front Range Water Quality Planning Association and the Weld County Health Department are currently reviewing this proposal. 941259 £JT F e �F� DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE C y 90TH MISSILE WING(AFSPACECOM) �i�"'� 14 h 1 . MEMORANDUM FOR WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT (PAM SMITH) WELD COUNTY COMMISSIONER (GEORGE BAXTER) WELD COUNTY PLANNING OFFICE (CHUCK CUNLIFFE) FROM: 90 CES/CEV 300 Velse Dr, Ste 600 F. E. Warren AFB WY 82005-2788 SUBJECT: Site Approval for Missile Alert Facility N-01 Septic System 1. Enclosed is the site approval application and accompanying package for the Missile Alert Facility N-01 septic system. The existing system is scheduled for repair spring 1995. As the design capacity exceeds the 2000-gallon per day limit for county approval, the application for site approval is hereby submitted. This package is being submitted simultaneously to the three county approving agencies therefore, the signature sheet enclosed with the application requires an original signature. All the signature sheets will be submitted to the State Department of Health once approved. 2. It is our understanding that this is quite a lengthy process. The state requires 180 days for review and approval. We are shooting for 5 Dec 94 submittal to the Areawide Water Quality Planning Association for their review at the 15 Dec 94 board meeting. Your cooperation and assistance in the approval process is greatly appreciated. Please forward any questions or comments to Madeline Algier at the above address or call (307) 775-2594 or myself at (307) 775-4360. QfrAIN/74eUAli T Chief, Environmental Management Attachment: Site Approval Application GUARDIANS OF THE HIGH FRONTIER 941259 .s10,--op `" 6, DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE 90TH MISSILE WING IAFSPACECGM) t H ;M 14 N0V 1994 MEMORANDUM FOR WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT (PAM SMITH) WELD COUNTY COMMISSIONER (GEORGE BAXTER) WELD COUNTY PLANNING OFFICE (CHUCK CUNLIFFE) FROM: 90 CES/CEV 300 Velse Dr, Ste 600 F. E. Warren AFB WY 82005-2788 SUBJECT: Site Approval for Missile Alert Facility N-01 Septic System 1. Enclosed is the site approval application and accompanying package for the Missile Alert Facility N-01 septic system. The existing system is scheduled for repair spring 1995. As the design capacity exceeds the 2000—gallon per day limit for county approval, the application for site approval is hereby submitted. This package is being submitted simultaneously to the three county approving agencies therefore, the signature sheet enclosed with the application requires an original signature. All the signature sheets will be submitted to the State Department of Health once approved. 2. It is our understanding that this is quite a lengthy process. The state requires 180 days for review and approval. We are shooting for 5 Dec 94 submittal to the Areawide Water Quality Planning Association for their review at the 15 Dec 94 board meeting. Your cooperation and assistance in the approval process is greatly appreciated. Please forward any questions or comments to Madeline Algier at the above address or call (307) 775-2594 or myself at (307) 775-4360. (-)/ wiiiiiti IGHT Chief, Environmental Management Attachment: Site Approval Application GUARDIANS OF THE HIGH FRONTIER 941259 COLORADO DEPAR. AT OF HEALTH Water Quality Control Division 4210 East 11th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80220 APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL FOR CONSTRUCTION OR EXPANSION OF: A) DOMESTIC WASTEWATER TREATMENT WORKS (INCLUDING TREATMENT PLANTS, OUTFALI. SEWERS, AND LIFT STATIONS) OVER 2,000 GPD CAPACITY. B) INTERCEPTORS (IF REQUIRED BY C.R.S. 25-8-702 (3)) APPLICANT: DOD, USAF, 90 Civil Engineer Squadron, Jack Knudson, Deputy Base Civil Engineer ADDRESS: 300 Vesle Drive, FE Warren AFB WY 82005-2788 PHONE: (307)775-3600 Consulting Engineer's Name and Address: 90 CES, Missile Engineer Flight, Fred Hansen, P.E. 300 Vesle Drive, Suite 800, FE Warren AFB, WY 82005-2796 PHONE:(307)775-2521 A. Summary of information regarding new sewage treatment plant: 1. Proposed Location: (Legal Description) SW 1/4, NE 1/4, Section 26 (43418 Weld County Road 129) Township RN , Range qRW , Weld County. 2. Type and capacity of treatment facility proposed: Processes Used Septic tanks and leach field system. SEE ENGINEERING STUDY FOR DETAIL. Hydraulic 2.367 Organic 2.55 (10 X 0.255) gal/day lbs. BOD5/day Present PE 0.255 Design PE 0.255 Z Domestic100 X Industrial 0 3. Location of facility: SEE ENGINEERING STUDY Attach a map of the area which includes the following: ATTACHMENTS I, VII & VIII (a) 5-mile radius: all sewage treatment plants, lift stations, and domestic water supply intakes. (b) 1-mile radius: habitable buildings, location of potable water wells, end an approximate indication of the topography. 4. Effluent disposal: Surface discharge to watercourse N/A Subsurface disposal Yes, leach field Land N/A Evaporation N/A Other N/A State water quality classification of receiving watercourse(s) N/A Proposed Effluent Limitations developed in conjunction with Planning and Standards Section, WQCD: BODE N/A mg/1 SS N/A mg/1 Fecal Coliform N/A /100 ml Total Residual Chlorine N/A mg/1 Ammonia N/A mg/1 Other N/A 5. Will a State or Federal grant be sought to finance any portion of this project? N/A 6. Present zoning of site urea? "A" Agricultural Zoning with a 1-mile radius of site? Same as above: "A" Agricultural 7. What is the distance downstream from the discharge to the nearest domestic water supply intake? .075 mile North to well of Kenneth Littlefield, Box 76, New (Name of Supply) Raymer, Colorado 80742 (Address of Supply) What is the distance downstream from the discharge to the nearest other point of diversion? 1.4 mile North Weer ro Pawnee Creek (Name of User) (Address of User) -1- WQCD-3 (Revised 8-83) 941259 8. has the responsibility for operating the 'posed facility? Jack B. Knudson, Deputy Base Civil Engineer, 90 Civil Engineer Squadron 9. Who owns the land upon which the facility will be constructed? United States Air Force (Please attach copies of the document creating authority in the applicant to construct the proposed facility at this site.) 10. Estimated project cost: $75,000.00 Who is financially responsible for the construction and operation of the facility?_ Construct by contractor. Operate by U.S. Air Force. 11. Names and addresses of all water and/or sanitation districts within 5 miles downstream of proposed wastewater treatment facility site. Town of New Raymer, CO 80742 (Attach a separate sheet of paper if necessary.) 12. Is the facility in a 100 year flood plain or other natural hazard area? N/A If so, what precautions are being taken? N/A Has the flood plain been designated by the Colorado Water Conservation Board, Department of Natural Resources or other Agency? N/A (Agency Name) If so, what is that designation? N/A 13. Please include all additional factors that might help the Water Quality Control Division make an informed decision on your application for site approval. ****SEE COMPLETE ENGINEERING STUDY**** B. Information regarding lift stations: 1. The proposed lift station when fully developed will generate the following additional load: Peak Hydraulic (MGD) N/A P.E. to be served N/A 2. Is the site located in a 100 year flood plain? N/A If yes, on a separate sheet of paper describe the protective measures to be taken. 3, Describe emergency system in case of station and/or power failure. N/A 4. Name and address of facility providing treatment: N/A 5. The proposed lift station when fully developed will increase the loading of the treatment plant to N/A R of hydraulic and N/A X of organic capacity and N/A agrees to treat this wastewater? YesN/A NoN/A (Treatment Agency) N/A Date Signature and Title -2- WQCD-3 (Revised 8-83) - 941258 'C, If the facility will be located on or adjacent to a site that is owned or managed by a 1 Federal or State agency, send the agency a copy.of this application. r - D. Recommendation of governmental authorities: Please address the following issues in your recommendation decision. Are the proposed facilities consistent with the comprehensive plan and any other plans for the area, including the 201 Facility Plan or 208'Water Quality Management Plan, as they affect water quality? If you have any further commentsor questions, please call 320-8333, Extension 5272. Recommend Recommend No 1 Date Agproval Disapproval Comment Signature of Representative 1, Management Agency 2, Local Government: Cities or Towns (If site is inside boundary or within three miles anddJ ration r str. s 3. / :oa d Co o is ion oca Heal h Authority. / 5. City County Planning Authority 6. Council of Governments/Regional Planning 7.• _ _ State Geologist (For lift stations, the signature of the State Geologist is not required. Applications for treatment plants require all signatures.) • I certify that I am familiar with the requirements of the "Regulations for Site Applications For Domestic Wastewater Treatment Works," and have posted the site in accordance with the regulations. An engineering. report, as described by the regulations, has been prepared and is enclosed. DATE ./e/C--)Loit-cy/ j� �7t+-d�� JACK B. KNUDSON Signature of Applicant TYPED NAME I • • 1\ I WQCD-3 (Revised 8-83) ` 4 3412S8 C. If th, .acility will be located on or adjacent to a site that is owned or managed by a Federal or State agency, send the agency a copy of this application. D. Recommendation of governmental authorities: (� Please address the following issues in your recommendation decision. Are the proposed facilities consistent with the comprehensive plan and any other plans for the area, including the 201 Facility Plan or 208 Water Quality Management Plan, as they affect water quality? If you have any further comments or questions, please call )20-833J, Extension 5272. �. Recommend Recommend No Date Approval Disapproval Comment Signature of Reoresentas lee 1. Management Agency 2. Local Government: Cities or Towns (If site is inside boundary or within three miles) and Sanitation Districts. 3. Board of County Commissioners _ 4. Q/ J,� J� /)( 5. 717- % 1 _f_--- — Lot ,F e, 1unn'i h /w 1 y County Pl nning Authority 0 6. Council of Governments/Regional Planning 7. State Geologist (For lift stations, the signature of the State Geologist is not required. Applications for treatment plants require all signatures.) t I certify that I am familiar with the requirements of the "Regulations for Site Applications For Domestic Wastewater Treatment Works," and have posted the site in accordance with the regulations. An engineering report, as described by the regulations, has been prepared and 1s enclosed. ,/ _.. DATE A��hr-,�e1-L 24-tie "7e4� JACK B KNUDSON Signature of Applicant TYPED NAME . C'-'t yTAVIT5-‘1 rr r , , 3 � t d' C. ' I r4./ : J C , u,�.�� 1 .• • DEC 1 9 199 f ..la rn9nty Planning - -3- *I.eei . . WQCD-3 (Revised 8-83) 941259 ENGINEERING STUDY FOR SITE APPLICATION Replacement of Domestic Wastewater Treatment System Missile Alert Facility N-01 931259 Eh_.NEERING STUDY FOR SITE APPLICA'._JN FOR REPLACEMENT DOMESTIC WASTEWATER TREATMENT SEPTIC SYSTEM AT MISSILE ALERT FACILITY NOVEMBER -01, NEAR NEW RAYMER, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO 13 October 1994 A. Background 1 B. Area Served 1 C. Proposed Limitations 2 D. Analysis and Performance 2 E. Alternatives Considered 2 F. Flood Plain and Hazard Analysis 2 G. Legal Description 3 H. Arrangements 3 I. Financial System 3 J. Construction Schedule 3 Attachment I Location Map, MAF Site N-01 Attachment II Construction Drawing, Plot Plan N-01, Sheet 159/42 Construction Drawing, Grading Plan N-01, Sheet 159/43 Attachment III Operational Guide for Stabilization Lagoons. WS-133A, 26 October 1964 Attachment IV The Engineering Company (TEC) Summary and Recommendations, 29 June 1990 Attachment V Weld County Design Review, 25 Sep 90, Permit, and System Installation Approval Construction Drawing, Septic System, N-01. [The Engineering Company (TEC) June 1990] Attachment VI Project WRN 93-6138 & 6139 Design Guide Attachment VII Construction Package, Repair Sewage System at MAF's, N-01 and C-01, Specifications and Drawings Attachment VIII Quad Map 1 and 5 Mile Radius of N-01. Attachment IX Section 2.4 of the Areawide Water Quality Management Plan for the Larimer-Weld Region Attachment X Drawing (Master Plan) , Site N-01, Sheet 54 of 90 (Legal) Attachment XI Domestic Wastewater Discharge Application Application for Site Approval for Construction or Expansion of Domestic Wastewater Treatment Works 941259 ENGINEERING STUDY FOR SITE APPLICATION FOR REPLACEMENT DOMESTIC WASTEWATER TREATMENT SEPTIC SYSTEM AT MISSILE ALERT FACILITY NOVEMBER -01, NEAR NEW RAYMER, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO A. BACKGROUND: Area served by proposed septic system is limited to the 5.62 acres owned by United States Air Force consisting of Missile Alert Facility (MAF) November-01 (N-01) located near New Raymer, Weld County, Colorado, see Attachment I. The site construction was completed in October 1964 as a launch control facility for the Minuteman Missile System. The facility was designed for a population of 14 people with a site contained domestic water well and single bowl lagoon waste system, see Attachment II. Lagoon design capacity was 980 gallons per day, see Attachment III. Over the past several years many of the requirements concerning lagoons have changed (percentage of seepage allowed, removal of overflow piping, etc. . . . ) so the Air Force decided to initiate a sewage system upgrade program to bring our existing systems up to current standards. The current single septic tank (2500 gal. ) and absorption field system at N-01 was constructed in October 1990 and was designed for 1,200 gallons per day around the same design load of 14 people, see Attachments IV and V. With Quality of Life being a primary concern a project was developed to improve the quality of domestic water through the installation of new water treatment equipment which included a reverse osmosis (RO) water treatment unit. The system installation was completed in October 1991. The RO unit discharge along with the daily flush cycle of the sand separater and carbon filter greatly increased the septic system load resulting in system flooding. Installation of a water softener last year has added to the effluent through its flush cycle while slightly improving the RO efficiency. Even with the RO unit adjusted to produce required quality with minimal discharge, the existing sewage system can not handle the flow and is periodically pumped, awaiting system replacement. The proposed septic system is sized to handle the present water room equipment, RO unit discharge along with normal site effluent and is based on our metered maximum daily useage of 1,262 gallons per day. We choose to increase this number by 25% because of a scheduled facility reconstruction, and with the 150% increase as required by the Weld County regulations our design flow (Q) is 2,367 gallons per day, therefore requiring this evaluation for site approval, see Attachment VI. B. AREA SERVED: There is no change to service. The system being replaced serves only the Air Force MAF N-01 and the proposed system in designed to serve only the effluent for the same facility, see Attachment VII. Original design population was 14 people which has decreased to a actual manning of 10 people. Water treatment equipment nearly doubles actual usage and projected manning indicates a possible slight decrease, however, manning is functionally near the minimum presently. Site N-01 is located about .80 miles south of the rural farm of Kenneth Littlefield, P.O. Box 76, New Raymer, CO 80742-0076, who is the owner of the land adjacent the site. The community of New Raymer is about 1.40 miles south of site N-01, see Attachment VIII. New Raymer dwellings are served by a community well and individual septic systems, and we are not aware of any plans to develope a community waste treatment system. No other community is within connection distance for consideration. 1 94125S C. PROPOSED LIMITATIONS: Area to be served is limited to the MAF and the population is limited to the programmed manpower. At the projected end of the missile system life, in Fiscal Year (FY) 2020, it is planned to deactivate and remove both the waste system and its served facility. D. ANALYSIS AND PERFORMANCE: Background shows a marginal track record on maintenance. Original lagoon was considered basically maintenance free, therefore corrective rather than preventative maintenance was practiced. Experience has shown this to not be the best policy and preventative maintenance is programmed into the proposed system, see Attachment VI. Septic tanks and leach field arches are programmed to be inspected twice a year. Septic tanks are programmed to be initially pumped yearly. Data from the inspections and pumpings shall be used to adjust the pumping frequency. Due to the land constraints the existing leach field is programmed to be removed rather than more common practice of being abandoned in place. E. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: Prior to permit rejection, our project contained all five Colorado MAF sites, the other four with replacement two bowl lagoons of a site adapted standard design. These sites are being redesigned for septic systems since Colorado has indicated that lagoons discharge to the atmosphere requiring a NPDES permit and extensive daily/weekly testing. The use of a septic system for N-01 was driven by the factors that the site was currently on a septic system, that the area is sufficiently suitable for this type of system in accordance with section 2.4 of the Areawide Water Quality Management Plan for the Larimer-Weld Region (see Attachment IX) , that the physical layout of the site limited choices, and that the amount of available government owned property limited size. There was not enough land for the two bowl lagoon configuration, therefore a septic tank and leachfield type system was selected. F. FLOOD PLAIN AND HAZARD ANALYSIS: The Air Force has operational plans covering flood and hazards. The plans require the MAF personnel to continually survey for and correct potential conditions which could lead to flooding or other hazards. Some emergency equipment is prepositioned at the MAF for this control. Additional material and equipment can be dispatched from F.E. Warren AFB if required. November-01 flooding potential is considered minimal. Topographically, the general area is moderately dissected, gently rolling plain with maximum relief of 300 feet. Moderately developed regional drainage trends to the northeast via South Pawnee Creek. The site is located in a pasture on the south rim of the South Pawnee Creek Valley. Drainage is to the northwest on slopes of 1 to 2 percent. Maximum relief within the site area is approximately 10 feet. The septic system is located down hill from the site and the land drops off from the leach field to the county road. The new absorption area is 50% surrounded by a berm which will divert surface water around the field. Within the bermed area a perimeter trench is installed to direct any surface water from the berm wall away from the new field. 2 941259 G. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: United States Air Force owns 5.62 acres for the purpose of the Missile Alert Facility and when that function is completed the facility is programmed to be removed and the site restored to pre-construction condition. In the case the site is declared surplus and sold any compliance requirements, in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) , would flow down to the new owner. See page 117 of enclosed project specifications (Attachment VII) for an actual legal description of the site. Also reference Attachment X. H. ARRANGEMENTS: Control arrangements, institutional arrangements, management capabilities, including user contracts, operating agreements, and pretreatment requirements are not applicable to this project. I. FINANCIAL SYSTEM: The operational funds are the mortgage against the missile system that traditionally is funded by Congress regardless of other cuts. Compliance must be maintained in accordance with regulations, therefore, the system will be either maintained to standards, use an approved work around, or be shut down. J. CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE: The revised project containing only Sites November -01 in Weld County, Colorado and Charlie -01 in Banner County, Nebraska is scheduled, if permit issued (NE. permit issued Sep. 94) , to start construction on 1 May 1995 at the start of that year's construction season. Construction duration is defined as 120 days total for the work at both sites. 3 941259 I Operational Guide for Stabilization Lagoons, WS-133A, 26 October 1964 ATTACHMENT III I OPERATIONAL GUIDE FOR STABILIZATION LAGOONS MINUTEMAN LAUNCH CONTROL FACILITIES WS-133A TECHNICAL FACILITIES FIFTH OPERATIONAL DEPLOYMENT AREA FRANCES E. WARREN AIR FORCE BASE, WYOMING Iprepared for BALLISTIC SYSTEMS DIVISION (AFSC) UNITED STATES AIR FORCE NORTON AIR FORCE BASE, CALIFORNIA I CONTRACT No. AF04(694)-664 JOB No. 3497-6 OCTOBER 26, 1964 I THE RALPH M. PARSONS COMPANY ENGINEERS-CONSTRUCTORS �PARSONS'av LOS ANGELES NEW YORK T Y 941259 PARSONS ° F ° TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE PAGE NO. I. INTRODUCTION 3 II. FUNCTIONAL DESCRIPTION 4 III. DESIGN CRITERIA 7 IV. DESIGN DESCRIPTION 8 V. MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS 14 2 The Ralph M. Parsons Company / Engineers . Constructors / Los Angele.9sQ,5Sk • fit j_u • PARSONS r I. INTRODUCTION This operational glide is prepared to provide a ready reference for those agencies and individuals who are involved in the operation of the Minuteman Weapon System facilities. The intent is to outline the basic operations of a stabilization lagoon, define the basic criteria that established the various features, and present the design features. It is not intended as a panacea for any and all problems which may arise but hopefully will provide a technical basis for the judicious application of corrective action. I I I I I I I 7 r 3 pp !� The Ralph M. Parsons Company / Engineers . Constructors / Los Angi44l&C S'ork PARSONS ° I II. FUNCTIONAL DESCRIPTION The treatment of effluent in a stabilization lagoon is basically a self-purification process. The term "stabilization lagoon" is used in preference to the more common "sewage lagoon" since this more aptly describes its function in waste treatment. In a correctly operating lagoon, both bacterial oxidation of organic matter and photosynthetic reduction of carbon dioxide takes place. I Where water containing organic matter is held in a pond under partly aerobic conditions, natural processes reduce the biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and lower the coliform bacterial content, producing an effluent free from odor and supersaturated with oxygen when algae are actively present. The oxygen necessary for aerobic action is basically derived from two sources, (1) oxygen from the atmosphere through aeration of the liquid, and (2) oxygen produced by algal photosynthesis in the pond. Unless energy is expended for aeration, the oxygen for stabilization is mainly derived by photosynthesis. IF Photosynthesis creates organic matter and involves the adsorption of light energy and a subsequent release of oxygen, while the aerobic destruction of organic matter requires utilization of an equivalent amount of oxygen and the release of energy. The organic matter is oxidized by bacteria to carbon dioxide, ammonia and other substances. These constituents and light energy are the principal requirements for algal photosynthesis. The complete cycle is shown schematically in Figure 1. I IF The Ralph M. Parsons Company / Engineers • Constructors / Los Angeles • New York 941259 * .RsDIsj-r1 ItIn winter, the lagoon will probably become anaerobic and a slower rate of ,{ decomposition takes place. Under anaerobic conditions, oxygen is derived �{ from organic compounds or split from nitrates and sulphates. The ice and snow cover inhibit light energy to a point where anaerobiasis is almost a certainty. During such periods, biological activity is reduced with the resultant accumulation of sludge deposits which are not dispersed because Iof the almost complete quiescence. CThese solids remain in a refrigerated condition until spring when increased temperatures speed up the biological action, and the winter's accumulation �I of fresh sludge begins to digest anaerobically at such a rate that so-called "acid digestion" prevails, with a lowering of pH and the potential production I — of hydrogen sulfide gases. Some odors may be present after the ice melts and during the period the lagoon transitions from the anaerobic to aerobic operation. Sludge accumulation is not considered a problem in the operation of stabili- zation lagoons. It is estimated that in a properly designed lagoon, sludge 1 build-up will not exceed 2 or 3 inches in over a hundred years of operation. I I I II . 5 The Ralph M. Parsons Company / Engineers . Constructors / Los Angeles . New York 941293 y - SUNLIGHT L ALGAL PHOTOSYNTHESIS 0- 4 CARBON L DIOXIDE DISSOLVED AND OTHER OXYGEN NUTRIENTS BACTERIAL ACTION SEWAGE I FIG. I SELF PURIFICATION CYCLE I 6 941259 ,,t IPARS0NS 0 0 III. DESIGN CRITERIA To minimize operational variations and to simplify maintenance procedures throughout the ing, the following criteria were established and used for the design of the stabilization lagoons. ItSubsequent operational conditions which grossly deviate from these criteria '��I may affect the operation of the ponds. Design population 14 residents ISewage per resident 70 gallons/day Total average daily flow 980 gallons/day L Daily BOD per resident 0.17 pounds plus 50 per cent for garbage grinders, etc., or 0.255 pounds/day Total avera ge daily BOD 3.57 pounds day Loading 20 pounds/BOD/acre/day Operating depths 3 feet average 5 feet maximum Freeboard 3 feet Siting limitation 200 feet from any building or water well a Infiltration losses Based on a permeability coefficient of 1 .010 gallons/day/sq.ft. per foot of head Climatological Data Temperature, precipitation and evaporation based on data from U. S. Department of Commerce, Weather Bureau Publications, "Climates of the States" I . — 7 The Ralph M. Parsons Company / Engineers . Constructors / Los Angeles . N9415051 59 — 1 t' PARSONS a fr j IV. DESIGN DESCRIPTION A. Restraints The configuration, depicted in Figures 2 and 3, evolved from the criteria and additional requirements imposed by the various local and governmental regulatory agencies associated with the Minuteman program. The stabilization lagoons were designed for: 1. Minimum maintenance 2. Functional and operational similarity throughout the wing 3. Odor-free operation 4. Minimum nuisance to the indigenous population I B. Design The stabilization lagoon is sized for the required surface area at approximately the three foot depth using the BOD rate specified in the criteria. i The five foot depth was established as the maximum desirable operating height for aerobic action and to preclude back-up of the sewer into the facility. A soil blanket consisting of an impervious material was specified to limit the infiltration rate. Normally,the sewage flows into the stabilization lagoon by gravity and the depth of burial of the sewer line is dependent upon the frost depth it of the locale. 8 The Ralph M. Parsons Company / Engineers • Constructors / Los Angeles . New York 941291 Z O O C U O J V j 0 CO Z I--. 4 •0079 1&Odd/7s 'S a J 701r1/10 NO/L 218/0 N/ 39NWIO 1 d , u_ 1/70M1370r f- L, o N Nc w cr O Q Li- -0 w o cn J 4 37OHNblN . ° O c.) a to Lu I- v cc Oo OD O Z Q 'ri Q co O v o) J N0/.109600 '-. �; o .10 �'9N6'HO .1(1 o Q p 370H/YdlN cn ec Wo ti � 0 �`f' CO o ti ti 2 Cl. W O m 0 Cr tea. V) VI' a o /. Ro O c) kJ cii F ' T '1/49 ) OCZ 4 I 2 ' 64, 941259 Z C_ K F . C- , �� V C : 4i C a. C C 2 C , re) C7 C N' 0 • H . Li 2 C i, H C N Q J i ? d W I- Cr -4 j• W ' a In 3 u4 u..Ij a , o \_..3!!! , r h Y� H O LitW O k 0 K ul i .. \ ? i • S --- a..'�,FU.F _hi)) !'),A 0 a a v - - o to .. - 941259 0. PARSONS fo C. Operation Since the majority of the Launch Control Facilities are bounded by private property which is primarily farm area, it is necessary to regulate the flow from the lagoon; and as no natural water courses and/or drainage channels were close enough to the site to permit an economical design, the stabilization lagoon is designed to cohtain the inflow except for a selected pump-out period. Continuous flow-through operation is unsatisfactory because in many cases water will flow into property which is under cultivation. Although the effluent from the Lagoon is essentially free of coliform bacteria, continuous flow is not desirable at all times. The design of the system anticipated pumping the lagoon down to an acceptable level during certain periods. The most acceptable times are during the fall, after the harvest, and in the spring, before the planting season. Table I was prepared to summarize the various factors that contribute to the loading. Temperature, precipitation, snowfall and evaporation are based on data derived from U. S. Department of Commerce publications; however, these 111 figures represent mean averages for the general area and will vary from site to site. The inflow is based on the criteria data for the design population, and the infiltration is based on the depth of water for the previous month. Figures 6 and 7 are graphical summaries of Table I. Figure 4 shows the volume depth relationship, and Figure 5 presents the BOD loading per acre per day based on the lagoon depth. 11 The Ralph M. Parsons Company / Engineers • Constructors / Los Angeles . Neu York 341259 PARSONS °ilill From the data presented in Table I, it is apparent that the lagoon will Itoperate satisfactorily whether the drawdown is performed in the spring or fall, and either solution will minimize the objections from the adjacent H Itproperty owners in the event that water inadvertently flowed into their land. A spring drawdown of the lagoon level will provide the least dilution Ill during the summer months, but the higher BOD loading would be acceptable Itbecause of the warmer weather and longer days. However, the maintenance 1 personnel will be faced with deciding the most propitious time. The pumping will have to be performed prior to the planting season but after the lagoon has become aerobic, which can vary from several days to several months after the thaw. An autumn drawdown will permit storage during the winter period and provide ix ' greater safety factor, but the BOD loading will be greatest during periods :il'h of decreased algal activity. Since the stabilization pond will not freeze as rapidly as clear water ponds, as we are constantly adding energy to the system in the form of sewage and the frost depth will be reduced for the IIsame reason, pumping in the fall is more attractive because the time frame available to the maintenance personnel is more leisurely and less critical. IIThe increased BOD loading is not a significant factor because the pond becomes anaerobic during the winter months and odors are eliminated by the ice cover. Table I represents a hypothetical situation during the first year since it is assumed that the beneficial occupancy was in January and three feet of t` water was present. In actuality, some adjustments might have to be made 4- 12 The Ralph M. Parsons Company / Engineers . Constructors / Los Angeles . New York PARSONS during the A&CO phase such as adding water to the system by using the by-pass 7 valve provided for this purpose in the water supply system. The infiltration rate will slowly decrease with time during the operational phase because the sludge deposits will increase the density of the impervious blanket on the bottom; however, after the first year's operation the cycle will be generally repetitive within the limitations imposed by flunctuating climatological conditions. The operating philosophy of the system can be reoriented to a continuous flow- 16 through function by making provisions for channellizing the flow into established drainage facilities. A supplementary pond can be provided to dispose of the overflow by evaporation and infiltration but this will require additional acreage. Unless the system is designed to accept the net flows listed in Table I plus rain or snow on its surface area, a drainage channel will be required. a, t I 13 The Ralph M. Parsons Company / Engineers . Constructors / Los Angeles . New York 941259 IPARSONS V. MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS A. Pump-down lagoon to required depth. B. Maintain lagoon weed-free to minimize mosquito infestation. (Good concentration of algae will inhibit weed growth by preventing penetration of sunlight to the bottom. ) C. Survey stabilization lagoon each spring to determine extent of frost damage, if any, and repair to preclude further degradation. D. Maintain rodent screens on overflow and check whether outfall is ■ clear of dirt and debris. I I I I I I I I . 14 The Ralph M. Parsons Company / Engineers • Constructors / Los Angeles . New York 941259 6 % _ I XI- NO I F. O N0 O a N 01 M ^i O Z R K. a p M h ^ I 0 ` I of• 0; Z ^) O O a OQ N n, < NiL Q 0 O U O t:::, I h 0 O p (V 0i 9� � .d N aJ Z a (o h O O a O O w r4p " m o ti M a 4; `° H O V> h • O 4j a - "., , N I N ,t: (.� I. Q V- 0 O o, 0 M R m ai W Q N ° J N h -- v N a CO Z o f h eo a a a p a Q o CO a I N I— H D O C; N N 0 0i '7 v 0i O b. a N 0' (i •tt. c a s ° o o, a b a m• , ^ p a m v p a (n CO a N 0 0 eo N-i O eJ: o, (ao Cr) Q b, e•<- < b0, N 0- N I N et: cr m 1- Q R p (o p et O O q '. Q O N I pr..: I Ni 0i et: ^ P 2 , nt O a r N ', N O m c''' h 0 I 0 h { p Q? co (i N \ O O a 0i 1 N N N er z N O ' F O h er a M . h (o I O I 0i pi q N O O 0, N N N R `° o r h h I m i N a `° pN C O O 0, o' ': N ^, �; M 9 0, N. o c‘., a a '` m J z M 14.O I aI er ti �� a l'•')' c O H ^ M N O m 0- V- R e' S'.. % a h c\., LO zn 'Z' h CO CO a' CO N N�+ O "' CO O O a ti f< a . tAl Q c X ''t. I c - o ,. N) N '1 N a N a N O0 p h ' 0- O m N ( �, ' ,,,, V. I. \, a er. N a Z \ \, `n co h it- O O N p a, p �O p M N O N O p \ of - 0-.-, co '- N o h r a N) N "' N `0- W >- a O er (o a p 01 \ O d• m en co es 6 ' a R — ,:t p kr, N cv O ^ -' 0 N a -- N I Nil a I.-.:- . u_ v 0 " N, ' p a O co e- p p • (A CO O % v N) 0, a N. p b (� o: Qa ..t < ' b 'P 0, N N1 f), et p U- co w Cr 0 p h O b ^ 'et. 'h h liJ x Q O 0, t% I \ a (o a M '•, K O 0 N M N ° Q I- w w h o, a m (L N O O N ^, o er z 3 • 0 N \' O O et. CO I Ol a. I 1'o ON 'h 9d6` o.f' �n LL ri Ni • ,• wi PO 'n * n M a- rr.. J _ • O O O O O W O 3 0 O Li a: a — J a x F: x 3 x Z 2 x W a Z d V H d OJ p' Q U N d vi J vi vi 3 ui o O c i 1-- w (n p ti {- J J J W J Q •u ix J z 6 ° Ct Q > Ca7 Z U W OJ < Q O 4 W u_ j Q W Q —1 4. W N d W 2 <L J J O `� O 2 - s4125 SS alf16 co 1334 NI Hid34 HI Hi II I ir dilliii"t co co \ — oc il o ' r in Q -J u____________ _- __— cc, W CC 0 1 --- j- Ca a r Cr P o T -- I -- co o D 0 • re J o 0 -- - ----- ----- --- - -- n a Z r" 0 0 oo N k V rin h Q _ S z — If, O VI J o -J _ _.__ _. _ .. __ co o T \ r N V .r O To Lu N m D ro J N O n. TO j \\ 0 J J _ io N. 1 w * _o N y a. M ) / o r lii - m i J — -r VI 0 VIt. p ,—_— o I I 60 55 I .. i r 50 Q CI 45 w I CC 40 Q I 35 m J I 30 c.9 2 1125 Q O J I 20 Ci 15 0 CCi 10 I5 I0 II0 I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 DEPTH IN FEET I I FIG. 5 LAGOON DEPTH - B. O. D. RELATIONSHIP I . Ii? 941259 5SZTt6 H1NOW aJd £01 X SNO11VJ 0 wf N O a N tOn I 745+ + + + c I I I.I r V -- W 1 Q .._[__ r I i ' z • L L 1 Z I Q ( V O , 4 J N Z W z 1 —, 1 U9 O z o o I tp J Iu Q I _I I 6 Lt. a H I 1, i f a 0 Z w a i I lrL Z 3 a I(E 1 i r- 0 y o f 1 i c� a L. �I J I • a J J I I I a S I _ a I- 1 _ I J I Z a 0 N 1 W �W 2 IU7 US J O I Cl) ' m J J LC.z z r O i•••az I q a a. r J > a c x ,--1 o o I I = 2 I) 1 ‘i , O I W N LL 1I ` 111 :- ; ` 1 -IIL.aj r0 Ne�co j+ + + I I I i I i DEPTH ( IN . `-cET1 O N W A Q U - U N In W U a U U a z m m n z rn _ a z a o o - a r n o r !1 o K o o a o K E w p 1 a ? o in' a U r -4 a y Ij - • C P 9 U m 9 O 0 r. M 0 0 M a z m m z a M s O a Z a —I 'illiN(1: r z '< K — ) a z r - - - 1 D G'1 a O Z -ri " I / 0U O r ^4 n C r I 2 mmOO 0O O OO O O O O O O O I VOLUME ( IN GALLONS ) 941259 N TEE Date: June 29, 1990 File: 90-014 F.E. Warren AFB Cheyenne, Wyoming ATTN: Ms Jan Lath RE: Sewage Treatment Investigations Dear Jan; We are pleased to submit herewith our findings and preliminary recommendations regarding the method of sewage treatment at the C-1, M-1, N-1, O-1, and S-1 sites. All five sites were investigated to ascertain soils type and on-site percolation rates. At the saute time, information regarding the current status of the lagoon systems was gathered. The data collected was utilized to examine and layout the most feasible alternatives at each site. Construction costs for these alternatives were developed for the purpose of arriving at the most cost effective conclusions. The conclusions drawn are presented in the discussions which follow. I request that you review the data and recommendations made herein and comment at your earliest convenience. We will no proceed into the final phase of the project until we've received written direction from you. If during the course of your review, you have any questions and/or require further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely; arren H. Mesloh P.E. Principal of the Firm N N • The Engineering Company (TEC) Summary and Recommendations, 29 June 1990 ATTACHMENT IV • THE ENGINEERING CO. 2310 EAST PROSPECT FT. COLLINS, CO 80525 PHONE: (303) 484-7477 941259 U SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS General The basic alternatives which were considered at each site involved some form of septic tank-absorption field system and total containment evaporative lagoons. The absorption systems or leach field systems as they are commonly referred to can be implemented in a variety of methods. Those which apply best to the LCF sites are the standard "trench type" system and the "bed type" system. The basic difference between the two layouts is in the area covered. In a bed type system, the total required absorptive area is contained within one solid gravel bed which contains all the perforated distribution piping. the trench system, on the other hand, uses individual trenches for each perforated piping lateral with a gravel bottom installed within the trench. As might be expected, this type of layout requires somewhat more space since the trenches are spaced four to six feet apart. The combined absorptive area of the trenches equals the area of the bed system. Thereire also new innovative approaches to laying out the bed and trench systems using plastic arches which are supposed to allow the elimination of the gravel bed and perforated piping. At two of the sites (S-1 and C-1), we examined the installation of bed type systems within the perimeter of the existing lagoons and backfilling the remainder of the lagoon system. Evaporative lagoons are sized to contain all the water received and dispose of it through evaporation and seepage through the bottom of the lagoon. The existing lagoons are were sized for approximately 1,000 gpd which will be somewhat deficient(except at the S-1 site) given the current design flow of 1,200 gpd. The standards for designing both septic tank- leach field systems and evaporative lagoons varies between the three states in which the five LCF sites are located. For instance, in Nebraska the DEC currently does not allow you to use seepage as parameter in sizing evaporative lagoons while Colorado allows 1/32 of an inch per day and Wyoming allows 1/8 inch per day. Each state has a slightly different formula for sizing septic tanks and the leach field rn depending upon flows,percolation and soil type. Subsequently,when though the design flow is the same in all cases the subsequent size of a particular unit may be larger or smaller than its counter part in another state due to the design parameters applied. We refer you to the particulars of each state design guideline for further information. We have used these guidelines in sizing the systems presented herein. Data Collection Each site under went an investigation to determine what type of soils were present and the respective percolation rates. To derive this data, we utilized a drilling rig and bored an exploratory hole to a depth of 10 feet and three percolation holes at three to five feet at each site. The percolation holes were filed with water at the time they were drilled and again the next morning roughly four hours before the measurements were taken. At the time the measurements were taken, the holes that needed it were again filled to within six inches of the surface. Mk 941259 N Measurements were then taken for the last hour at approximately fifteen minute intervals. The results of the soils classifications are given on the boring logs contained in the appendix attached herewith. All sites were found capable of supporting a septic tank- leach field system. The percolation rates at each site are summarized below, detailed information is provided in the appendix: SITE PERC. RATE RANGE C - 1 12 - 30 min/inch M - 1 10 - 40 min/inch N - 1 10 - 13 min/inch O - 1 7 - 40 min/inch S - 1 6 - 20min/inch Recommendations Charley Site. Located in Banner County, Nebraska, this site does not lend itself well to continued use with an evaporative lagoon. The primary reason for this is the current design requirements of DEC regarding the use of a zero seepage factor for lagoons. At this site that correlates to a lagoon with a surface area of 0.52 acres compared to the current size of 0.23 acres. To achieve the required size would amount to an estimated expenditure of$23,881. - Below the topsoil(1 ft), the site is comprised of silty sand which would work well for absorption type systems. No ground water was encountered in our explorations down to 10 feet. We looked at installing a bed system within the perimeter of the existing lagoon and backfilling the unused portion of existing lagoon. To implement this proposal would require an expenditure of roughly $18,926. A basic trench system would cost approximately $11,270. The required absorptive bed or trench area is 1,320 square feet. We recommend that a trench or bed type system be installed outside the lagoon perimeter at this site. As indicated above, the cost would fall between $11,000 and $12,000. Cost breakdowns are provided in the appendix attached hereinafter. Mike, November and Oscar Sites. These sites located in Logan and Weld County Colorado all have similar site characteristics. No ground water was encountered at any of the sites and the soil profiles are similar with silty fine sand in most bores with some clayey sand at the Oscar site. Weathered sandstone was found at a depth of 10 feet at the Mike site which was not encountered elsewhere. Examination of evaporative systems at these sites lead to similar results in terms of size requirements. With an allowance of 1/32 inch/day seepage, an evaporative rate of approximately 47 inches/year and a design flow of 1,200 gpd, the size required for an evaporative lagoon is 0.36 water surface acres. All three sites presently are in the N 941259 N neighborhood of 0.23 acres. To increase a site to the required size would require the addition of approximately 5,227 square feet of water surface area or could be viewed as extending one side of the lagoon roughly 50 feet. This correlates to an earth work volume of approximately 1,500 cubic yards. The estimated cost of accomplishing this task would amount to approximately $11,000. Implementing trench type absorption beds at these sites would require about 1,000 square feet of absorption bed area. This amounts to a system with four laterals of 90 feet in length placed in trenches spaced about 6 feet apart. The cost of this type of system at each site would be in the neighborhood of$12,000 per site. Individual estimates prepared for each site area as follows: SITE COST AREA M - I -$11,908 1,073 sf N - 1 $11,473 865 sf O - 1 $12,099 1,046 sf Subsequently, the estimated costs of renovating the sites using either approach is very similar. However, when looking at system reliability and operation and maintenance over a 20 year period, the lagoons are a cheaper prospect since they do not need routine operational care and have a very minimal maintenance routine consisting of cleaning once every 15 to 20 years. The septic tank systems would need to be cleaned every six months and the leach field bedding replaced or moved every 10 to 15 years. Considering the O &M factor, we would recommend the Colorado sites utilize the evaporative lagoon approach. Sierra Site. Located in Goshen County , Wyoming, this site consists of two existing lagoons as compared to the single lagoons at the other sites. Soils at this site are composed of silty fine sand with a relatively shallow ground water depth. While we did not hit ground water within the first 10 feet, the sand was very damp indicating that we were not far from the static water level. The two existing lagoons have a combined surface area of 0.44 acres which compares favorably with a requirement of 0.22 acres for an evaporative system using a 44 inch/year evaporation rate, 15 inch rainfall and 1/8 inch/day seepage rate. Therefore, the lagoons at this site meet the requirements for an evaporative system and do not need to be expanded. The valving arrangement between the lagoons need to be checked to make sure it is full open and that it is transferring water from the primary to the secondary pond. Examination of a bed system within the existing lagoon system and backfilling the unused area was fund to be very expensive. The required area is 2,600 sf of absorptive area which translates to a bed roughly 51 feet square. The cost of the bed system was estimated at $25,410. A regular trench type system would cost less however, it would still be a significant expenditure of approximately $15,000. 941259 SSZTV6 • Z a J -J -.-.3.-.-.-._._.-.-.-_- I I Li � I Q I t...............,•i I _� Z a —r W o I I `" I- t I < \ - a _ j a�� a II a 11 0 W yL W W _ .2 A F, X-2 • L -.- 5 . I 1 I W I / W I ® . I I i .1 II II II U IN IIIII U LCF SITE N - 1 IIIPERCOLATION TEST RESULTS TEST WATER LEVEL TIME PERCOLATION II HOLE TIME DEPTH DROP. INTERVAL RATE (IN) (MIN) (MIN/IN) East 10:53 17.25 MI 11:08 19.88 -2. 63 15 5.70 11 :23 21.5 -1.62 15 9. 26 11: 35 22.5 -1 12 12.00 INMiddle 10:54 16 .75 11 :09 18. 25 -1. 5 15 10.00 NI 11:24 19.38 -1.13 15 13 .27 11 :35 20. 25 -0 . 87 11 12.64 rWest 10.57 12 11 :12 14 . 25 -2 .25 15 6.67 11: 25 16 -1.75 13 7.43 IN11:37 17 . 25 -1 . 25 12 9.60 IN II IN M MI MI t I 9412'x9 LOG OF BORING NO. B- _ OWNER Page 1 of I ARCHITECT/ENGINEER U.S. NAirI Force The Engineering Company SITE PROJECT Levfincr-County, Colorado Missile She Sewer System Upgrades O SAMPLES TESTS )- 0 J • \ LyLy J ^ O LL H 0 t: U W IA 0 DESCRIPTION LL E a N IX m z ♦ a i .Z,v= kit C H Ut W D 1 in H 0 w Z a a U E a 0 I- 3 H ) a U a a Surface Elev.: ft, o tO D r ww a J 0 MU 21- U O _ °a ' a TOPSOIL AND VEGETATION (Sandy Lean Clay) PA " Brown — --. 2.0 SILTY SAND TRACF — 'µ NDS E"'•3.0 SA_ TpN — Light Brown Bottom of Boring •• Classification of the bedrock materials is based on visual and tactual observation of disturbed sample& and auger cuttings. Coring and/or petrographic analysis may reveal other rock types. t. THE STRATIFICATION LINES REPRESENT THE APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY LINES' BETWEEN SOIL AND ROCK TYPES: IN-SITU, THE TRANSITION MAY BE GRADUAL. Cel ibrated Nand Penetrometer• WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS BORING STARTED 6-7-90 '0L 2 None WD or WS 7 NoneBO A ,_ �WL RIG E-$$ FOREMAN COMPLETED 6-7-90 ACII 41 B lierracon R "1E-55 .,;�. APPROVED LLL JOB # 12905025-2 941259 • LOG OF BORING NO. B-2 '5 OWNER Page 1 of I ARCHITECT/ENGINEER U.S. Air Force The Engineering Company SITE ,wrap N-1 PROJECT -I+ wr County, Colorado Missile Site Sewer System Upgrades SAMPLES TESTS 0 ~ 0 J .. OJ F F LL w 0 O DESCRIPTION ,a. L w N >- C Z \ LC Z Zr ,..,,, a T in w in I N i- O Z Z t 0 C a. CO L a. U I-O ,Ni }LL URLL Surface Elev.: ft. w u, D > w a -1 o MU zI-m :?}:, O D Z I- Ir w w E ❑a D oo a TOPSOIL AND VEGETATION PA (Sandy Lean Clay) — i. `; Brown ,;, : ; '. 2.0 , - j,, SILTY FINE SAND - Light Brown 5- - r cl•AYFY SAND Light Brown - 10.0 — Bottom of Boring 10 mr IllTHE STRATIFICATION LINES REPRESENT THE APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY LINES BETWEEN SOIL AND ROCK TYPES: IN-SITU, THE TRANSITION MAY BE GRADUAL. Calibrated Hand Penetrometer* L- WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS BORING STARTED 6-7-90 -- Ill a V None WD or WI* None AD METED�WllerraccinBORI RIG CME-55 FOREMAN ACII L APPROVED LL1. JOB # 12905025-2 941259 N - LOG OF BORING NO. ScPage 1 of 1 OWNER ARCHITECT/ENGINEER Ill U.S. Air Force The Engineering Company SITE -clew/flierN-1 PROJECT 6A County, Colorado Missile Site Sewer System Upgrades a SAMPLES TESTS 0J IL. O W Na DESCRIPTION LL N W Z \ IX W LL 0 IA0. C I W J I N 1— 0 ZZ Er LL U co LL U 1-3 N T LL 0 M U. W N J )- W a.J 0 Wa Z1-el o Surface Elev.: ft. _ o D Z I- D: tow E on. D or O. U TOPSOIL AND VEGETATION _ PA (Sandy Lean Clay) Brown 2.0 I % CLAYEY SAND 3.0 Light Drown " Bottom of Boring it- THE STRATIFICATION LINES REPRESENT THE APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY LINES Calibrated Hand Penetrometer* BETWEEN SOIL AND ROCK TYPES: IN-SITU, THE TRANSITION MAY BE GRADUAL. 0 WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS BORING STARTED 6-7-90 __ ,., Q None WD or WS None AB BORING COMPLETED 6-7-90 11'err acon RIG CME-55 FOREMAN ACII (WL APPROVED LLL JOB # 12905025-2 941?5• LOG OF BORING NO. B-4 Page I or I [ OWNER ARCIIITECT/ENGINEER iipU.S. Air Force The Engineering Company SITE xedier N-f PROJECT County, Colorado Missile Site Sewer System Upgrades USAMPLES TESTS J f• m .. ). O a H w o DESCRIPTION ≥ C _ \ ¢ Z Hf ll H I IL F V) W W O 13 I- 0 Z Z a a O E a 0 I-O w Ya IX o Surface Elev.: ft. w m D )- w 0.J 0 lr0 zI-el TOPSOIL AND VEGETATION z 1- ft 1.0m E D a m a (Sandy Lean Clay) PA Brown — 2.0 - ACLAYEY SAND 3.0 Light Brown _ A IBottom of Boring • THE STRATIFICATION LINES REPRESENT THE APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY LINES Calibrated Hand Penetrometer* BETWEEN SOIL AND ROCK TYPES: IN•SITU, THE TRANSITION MAY BE GRADUAL. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS BORING STARTED 6-7-90 L 4 None WD or WS T None AB BORING COMPLETED 6-7-90 '�[wt. 1 ferr acon RIG CME-55 FOREMAN ACI I WL APPROVED LLI. JOB # I2905O25-2 j 4 259 LOG OF BORING NO. B—J Page I of l OWNER ARCIIITECT/ENGINEER U.S. Air Force The Engineering Company _ SITE W 14 N-1 PROJECT tanner County, Colorado Missile Site Sewer System Upgrades SAMPLES TESTS O 0 1 Om • 0 DESCRIPTION w )- a Z• a z z I- it a C LL U E IL r to to w 0 U I-00 H )-IL 3 in U a all W el D Y W 6J O aU ZI-N u Surface Eler.: ft. o 3 z I- a a m t o D. 7 el a TOPSOIL AND VEGETATION PA (Sandy Lean Clay) — Brown 2.0 - ,�. CLAYEY SAND '' ( 3.0 Light Brown Bottom of Boring - • THE STRATIFICATION LINES REPRESENT THE APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY LINES Calibrated Hand Penetrometer* BETWEEN SOIL AND ROCK TYPES: IN-SITU, THE TRANSITION MAY BE GRADUAL. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS BORING STARTED 6-7-90 ^ `• 2 None WD or WS C None AB BORING COMPLETED 6-7-90 .L 1 �e rr acon RIG CME-55 FOREMAN ACII tWL APPROVED LLL JOB # 12905025-2 9412r39 I - 7- n- . II DATE ccb�� /CZ-' Ire,'/%'N /9 P17. Z K MY LOCATION DESIRED AMPERAGF NDRILLERS LOG JOB NO. 90 -F'63r- i LAUNCH PACILITYA/OO.wmfl—ze III DEPTH MATERIAL ill O- CY S - 7 Fos< ,/,s Sri,le-t1 t• vr tSteS. /y /3 -v 7 - t/ Sa..r 5f/o.ve IPc/x /f. ocuy U r-9/ --- 94- tff'x �t/!S -52?-4,e/ C�nNP .c/y t?ir,.'cw . 4- rJis #/4v✓P C «<c -CA 'ne,r. r�l Y7/ . U ANODE DEPTHS TO TOP OF it Size of Test Hole ANODE t Depth of Test Hole N #2 / yn Ill Size of Finished Hole .4/.../A- #3 /fin /O .. #4 /7e, Depth of Finished Hole .27/f / #5 / . n iiSize of Casing j` #6 /s`e, bottom of Steel Lead � / #7 ./..91,1 qe /o Bottom of Perforated o/ ! no#9 /10 //O Top of Perforated /o ! Type "Loreaco" .Used PiaAmt. Loresco Pumped Outside b�vO,O z_ // Tvn-f'// Amt. Loresco Pumped Inside Air Force Inspector on Job 7_c-420. type Anoed Used • No. Anoeds Used /0 )escription of Anode Caps -• Amt. of Lead Wire Left /CI 4- 941.E39 41/4 4:4 gt,'Fr. 141° DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 1517 - 16 AVENUE COURT IGREELEY, COLORADO 80631 O ADMINISTRATION (303)353-0586 HEALTH PROTECTION (303)3530635 COMMUNITY HEALTH (303)353-0639 COLORADO September 25, 1990 F.E. Warren Air Force Base Headquarters 90th Combat Group 90th CSG/DEL Building 320 F.E. Warren AFB, Wyoming 82005 Re: Individual Sewage Disposal System Permit #G-900190 Dear Sir: This is to inform you that your engineer designed septic system has been reviewed by the Weld County Board of Health and approved as submitted. Approved: A copy of the Weld County Board of Health I.S.D.S. Review Form and your I.S.D.S. Permit are enclosed. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE SYSTEM MUST BE INSPECTED BY A REPRESENTATIVE OF THIS DEPARTMENT AND BY THE DESIGNING ENGINEER, BEFORE THE SYSTEM CAN BE APPROVED FOR OPERATION. THE ENGINEER MUST CERTIFY TO THIS DEPARTMENT, IN WRITING, THAT THE SYSTEM HAS BEEN INSTALLED ACCORDING TO HIS/HER SPECIFICATIONS. Should you have any questions regarding your septic system, please contact this office at your earliest convenience at 353-0635. Sincerely, TofinikitvitPam Smith-Pinkstaff� Wes Potter, Director Environmental Protection Specialist Environmental Protection Services PSP/WP693/cs Weld County Design Review, 25 Sep 90, cc: Engineer Permit, and System Installation Approval Weld County Department of Plannin Construction Drawing, Septic System, N-01 I.S.D.S. File [The Engineering Company (TEC) June 1990] ATTACHMENT V 941? g . WELD COUNTY BOARD OF HEALTH ENGINEER DESIGNED SYSTEM REVIEW PLICANT: lil.Ll,l rell IAtall- 6,37(.1C etl'ti(n IC.1 W'y NO: ( ` gm) i o LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PT 1010 Li QA)y/ SEC Cl(C TWN 9 RNG Sce SUBDIVISION LOT - BLOCK - FILING SITE ADDRESS: (.- Lac 1,OCct kg - OW) lQattiIa i /� - (�1qit'd as / FACILITY:(c4th eAti9 -Lawn(k l(�&`kItof ri(I Paf y .Wc1Jfn<<)JR1 ) ill pep*ACRES: 3,ti --- PERC RATE: 30 ► ut. SOIL: S(,LL��id( WATER SUPPLY: P f�J lit SLOPE: 0 fff LIMITING ZONE: 'i 1 ENGINEER DESIGN (3. 5))� n EXPERIMENTAL DES IGN (3 . 14 . ENGINEER: , ,(,l',rrtr&, lktslok r APE +/1 ; oq3 , the Clt/ 1ncrrirrl ez. ADDRESS: 23 O G, ithi.ut 1 1`T 1 )ill% £o u z ESTIMATED FLOW: (op` ) � /y G.P.D. L2 .(7f PRIMARY TREATMENT: C tfebdnnt¢.w{- �hitt- CAPACITY: c ,?' Z) lti;Ci.11f))4S/ nISPOSAL METHOD:TO(1 lira tor count OC Cro0,r ! SLEAt , SIZE: I%2k1"Z'H41/Ira kL 1.urfl/.-t-kf 1-14( ) u1v& Corn—fro( Vc≥eiLcty l��br-�jraUcd Vi-i Ius a Stooge lae o9A apiink 1 lltet( 0041 an 01,0nc}cu 1-(A-e. Lac a. pvt .&utt / �e Qef�on 0,_un u( bu Q. o_e id-t(L)r lie.w`xrO dfan'eu . , ` iw r aj� tn//- 0— lit S , STAFF COMMENTS:CttfAr'f«�1 }L CI(S4LILL I.Mk a 1 O I'2 frt.. bor ..P l- 41—Yok L.(_(.Lr,_: '1 --Ltccilkr(J'or CLISldw& Or 1 Jo (xk cLfAU _, `i E. Licit/ft-kr is overctttd by Qpprovimab I iTto.liile, (3tcuoel cl5¢-ut. IS Ot G.RSC nuUS(Z Dtci.t.usr Fitt. Q,llr - p._crc. �e. IS l&SSfl��u+�(,w 14 Jri nue ( ' r. ) L(�Q. t1u 'Jf Lu't> r a.- 11.01Ck calk_ STAFTtRECOMMENDA ION: Q.PPrOix'.i ( ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION SPECIALIST:7ailit Shill A. 19tAk V 6_.. REVIEWED BY BOARD:(�\A % - 2 5---q o B.O.H. DECISION: Al / APPROVED DENIED TABLED Tom Cope, Chairman ___ Weld County Board of Health 'ES24 941,259 rig September 14, 1990 FILE: 90-014 F. E. Warren AFB 90 CSG/DEL Building No. 240 F. E. Warren AFB, Wyoming 82005-5000 ATTENTION: Ms. Jan Lach, Engineer RE: LCF Waste Treatment Systems - P.O. #F48608-90-W0486 Dear Jan: With reference to the waste treatment system improvements we have submitted to the various agencies, I'm enclosing herewith the approval for the November-1 site. This permit is good for one year, so if you do not construct within that time an extension needs to be filed. Weld county requires that they inspect the leach field system prior to backfilling, so we will need to coordinate that during the construction at this site. I've also attached a revised sheet for this site which incorporates the bed size changes made subsequent to additional percolation testing done in the vicinity of the leaching bed. The percolation was slower so the bed got larger as you would expect. We now must have 5 laterals at that location. With respect to the Nebraska sites, I expect approval shortly. I've attached the changes requested by NDEC in their initial review. Those changes were: 1) note sludge disposal requirements with NDEC Regs., 2) Place 8 inches of gravel beneath the laterals at the Kilo site, 3) note the location of the well at the Kilo site and 4) delete the partition wall in the first septic tank in series at both sites. I will forward whatever paperwork I get back from those people. If you have any questions regarding the aforementioned items please contact me. Also, if you need computer disks of the revised sheets please call Randy or Jack at our office. Sincerely GW ren H. Mesloh, P.E. resjdent TIM ENGINEERING CO. End. WHM:rk THE ENGINEERING CO. 2310 EAST PROSPECT FT. COLLINS, CO 80525 PHONE: (303) 484-7477 941259 ' i ,l t.! r • ' W.iiv hit geed y Tr)[Ircder - • (35 ': ,. • 0Df13{-tuLQ' QS avL -Q..i1y111 .(r Cte&9n _.. • • 941259 f,•gil,}raiUR • Ja Coln 16/IAsh,��P tts . vu`s\'tsmot«« LWL 941259 • Weld County Health Department IS16 HOSPITAL ROAD GREELEY. COLORADO 80631 7 1303) 353-0586N2 12661 / Date 7 - �i 1s 901 n Received of Address U S ` r 1 o c p (Lei- ? 1 AMOUNT $ • ` ,' '"'air ed-.1;171 & Dollars 100 FULL ACCOUNT \R.k1County— eahhDepartmenr CASH CHECK SS 46 DRAF- MONEY ORDER ` For New SI Rec'd By l J • • • 941259 • • • • DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH I (40 1516 HOSPITAL ROAD 1 IWA1\ GREELEY, COLORADO 60631 ADMINISTRATION (303) 353-0566 HEALTH PROTECTION(303)353-0635 COMMUNITY HEALTH (303) 353-0639 COLORADO STAFF APPROVAL OF ENGINEER-DESIGNED SYSTEM The engineer—designed Individual Sewage Disposal System,. proposed n for the property located at ccvG. rotat:)i 'Tafdt tU btu:tt4k /� CU: PQtjniri and designed by 4.�v r 14_t4! bt_ ► C, MTh. ty1G'4fPo✓J05 e( is hereby approved subject to the following conditions: OgnShL Qom, OtA '%L lC1tnc,e.r de „ _ applicant for I.S.D.S. Permit No.64001C10 10� I, /,{/�I�Y'EA� 45/e/ G R I�O under"' the provision of the Weld County Individual Sewage Disposal System Regulations, do hereby understand and agree that after approval by the Director of Health Protection Services, I may proceed with the construction of my engineer-designed sewage disposal system prior to approval by the Weld County Board of Health, but that the Board of Health reserves the right to disapprove any or all parts of the system design when it considers my application. I understand and agree that I proceed at my own risk and that I may be required by the Board to remove any or all of the system installed prior to Board of Health consideration of my application. (//44 Director, Health Protection Appl cant 9— 7- 9O // • Date • Date • 941259 • -- C I • C r • C ) a .--Io ) a) N t C P N 0 3 a m 0 • f.• • O 'd O a) u DO • N N 3 H al •., tl N al '0 d a m O 00 N '0 I— m 0 W II-4 0 b t-4 a ,i a 0 CC 0 Q14 W U 0 00 N C W ~ y 4-4 b A P4 W rCl CI — = m Gai W a w W 1 r a) H J 0O )O U m > C L W F sOi F P C C Wm r O Fy� M N OCC O rl H 'J en O .c u u O it r 0 0 a a N H *el I— rd o Z 0 rl . a .a ? U z a m w < . a w m o n m H • O A 1d .'t al J N 1) N • W pr1 N H 3 E.1 O .c 0 2 a u .1 ~ H M 30 +' b it N. al rt A W ~ CO N C ) H C a O [I- N O U U Hi U N N b 0 III '0 C3 •r1 HI •H 'O vi 0 •[a al Z tH HI ti 4-,to O H M N IJ L1 a) f3 • •-1 N in W rl N P+ 941259 3 (e.$7; t!ttpgineer�,y��`� . 404‘ ,: Eck G.&i "s p h, fl ►!ail 14:7 4849 co (w' 141 * . k 1/\1` / n it * Ic , , 0. t8 + el**CO* $Vyu aIN�' DESIGN GUIDE FOR SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS AT MISSILE ALERT FACILITY PREPARED BY 90th CES/CEL MISSILE , ENGINEERING F.E. WARREN AIR FORCE BASE CHEYENNE, WYOMING BUILDING 240 FREDERICK G. HANSEN (307) 775-2521 1/4 Project WRN 93-6138 & 6139 Design Guide ATTACHMENT VI 9412;4 TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE Page No. I. Introduction 2 II. Functional Description 3 III. Design Description 5 IV. Maintenance Requirements 8 V. Design Summary 9 TABS Tab 1. Percolation Tests Results. Tab 2. Terracon Data for Sewer System Upgrades. Tab 3. Soil Survey of Weld County. Tab 4. Porter 8 O'Brien Core Logs and Groundwater Data. Porter 4 O'Brien Well Design and Construction Data. 1 9412 9 I. INTRODUCTION This operational guide is prepared to provide a ready reference for those agencies and individuals who are involved in the operation of the Missile Alert Facility Septic Sewage Disposal system facilities. The intent is to outline the basic operations of a waste water septic tanks and the land application system, define the basic criteria that establishes the various features, and present the design features. It is not intended as a panacea for any and all problems which may arise but hopefully will provide a technical basis for the judicious application of corrective action. 2 941259 II. FUNCTIONAL DESCRIPTION The septic tank system treatment of effluent is processed initially in the septic tanks and finally in the subsurface absorption field. The treatment of effluent in a septic tank system is basically a self-purification process. The self-purification process conditions the sewage so that it can percolate into the subsoil more readily. Three functions take place within the tank. First, removal of suspended solids through the design of the tank and the flow rate. The larger solids sink to the bottom or rise to the surface. These solids are retained in the tank, and the clarified liquid effluent is discharged. Secondly, biological decomposition by bacterial and natural processes. Bacteria present are of the variety called anaerobic which thrive in the absence of free oxygen. This decomposition or treatment of sewage under anaerobic conditions is termed "septic", hence the name of the tanks. Sewage which has been subjected to such treatment causes less clogging than untreated sewage containing the same amounts of suspended solids. Third, retention of sludge and scum. 3 941259 II. FUNCTIONAL DESCRIPTION Continued. Sludge is the accumulation of solids at the bottom of the tank, while scum is a partially submerged mat of floating solids that may form at the surface of the fluids in the tank. Sludge, and scum to a lesser degree, will be digested and compacted into a smaller volume. However, this residual of inert solid material will remain in the space provided during the interval between cleanings. A considerable portion of sludge and scum are liquified through decomposition or digestion. During this process, gas is liberated from the sludge, carrying a portion of the solids to the surface, where it accumulates with the scum. Ordinarily, they undergo further digestion in the scum layer, and a portion again settles to the sludge blanket on the bottom. 4 9 1259 III. DESIGN DESCRIPTION A. Restraints The majority of the Missile Alert Facilities, except Site G-01, were constructed with stabilization lagoons. Site G-01 is on a municipal system. Stabilization lagoons were selected to be used as the replacement. However two sites, Site C-01 and Site N-01, had been converted to septic tanks and subsurface absorption fields. Site C-01 and Site N-01 are both Class II reverse osmosis (RO) water treatment systems sites. The septic modification was prior to the Class II classification and these systems need replaced. Septic systems were selected to be used retained as their replacement. The configuration, depicted in drawings evolved from the land constraints, the criteria, and additional requirements imposed by the various local and governmental regulatory agencies associated with the Missile Alert Facilities. The septic tanks and subsurface absorption field systems were designed for: 1. Minimum maintenance 2. Functional and operational similarity 3. Use of available land 4. Minimum nuisance to the indigenous population 5 9412'59 III. DESIGN DESCRIPTION Continued. B. Design A standard buried septic system with septic tanks, distribution box, and chambered arch leach field shall be installed. In addition in Nebraska a dosing tank and single siphon shall be installed between septic tanks and the distribution box. The septic tanks are sized for the required retention time using the design flow established (See DEsign Summary. A standard two tank series configuration was selected for the use of standard units and to provide better suspended solids removal and additional protection for the soil absorption system. C. Operation Site sewage with reverse osmosis flush is discharge from the MAF through a manhole to the waste treatment system. At sites with a septic system the sewage enters a 2,000 gallon two compartment septic tank for the first part of the two part treatment process. The solid waste begins partial breakdown by anaerobic bacterial action in the septic tanks. In this process the waste is separated into three components: effluent, sludge, and scum. Undigested particles settle into sludge at the bottom of the tank. Undigested soap and grease float to the top as surface scum. The liquid in the area between is the constantly churning effluent of organic nitrogen/urea-rich gray water. .It takes roughly six months for a tank to build a fully productive colony of bacteria, and 24 hours for solids to be broken down as far as possible. 6 C. Operation Continued. As new sewage enters the tank, an equal volume of effluent is forced by the exit baffle into the second 1,000 gallon two compartment septic tank for continued settling of sludge to the bottom. As additional new sewage enters the system, an equal volume of effluent is forced by the exit baffle along the system. At Site C-01 the effluent is forced on into the 2,000 gallon single compartment dosing tank in which a single siphon with overflow is installed. The function of the dosing tank and siphon is to let the leach field be alternately flooded and let dry. The single siphon shall alternately hold and discharge it's design quantity in the distribution box. At N-01 and from the siphon at C-01 the effluent flows into the distribution box. The distribution box equally discharges the effluent into the ten discharge lines to the separate leach laterals where the affluent is broken down in the leach field. As much as 60 percent of the liquid evaporates and the rest is absorbed by plant roots. The really impressive part of this process, however, concerns the poisonous organic nitrogen and urea compounds that remain in the leach field. A nitrifying bacteria found only in the top several feet of top soil converts these components into ammonium, nitrites, and nitrates. Nitrates, in turn, are tapped by the amino acids in plant roots and become plant food. The entire process requires predominantly septic (without free oxygen) conditions. 7 9x1239 IV. MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS A. Tasks to be assigned the Air Force Civil Engineer Maintenance Team (Site Zone) . 1. Biannual inspection of septic tanks, dosing tank, single siphon, distribution box, and leach field. Sludge and scum levels in tanks and box shall be taken and recorded. 2. Biannual verification of design operation of the single siphon and the overflow function. 3. Annual inspection of septic tanks, dosing tank, single siphon, distribution box, and leach field during contract tank cleaning. Sludge and scum levels in tanks and box shall be taken and recorded. 4. Maintain farm fence around the absorption field area to prevent vehicle or livestock compaction or inspection vent damage. B. Tasks to be preformed by contract periodic maintenance. 1. Annual septic tanks, dosing tank, and distribution box cleaning to remove sludge and scum. NOTE After sufficient data is accumulated the duration between inspection and cleaning operations may be revised. 951.259 8 V. DESIGN SUMMARY MAF NOVEMBER - 01 DESIGN SUMMARY TYPE II WATER PURIFICATION/SEWAGE TREATMENT 1. OWNER: F. E. Warren AFB Cheyenne, Wyoming 2. ADDRESS: 90th Missile Engineer Squadron 90 CES/CEL Building 240 F. E. Warren AFB, Wyoming 82005-2796 3. Date of Field Investigations: Test Holes/Soil Profile: June 7, 1990 Percolation Tests: June 7, 1990 (3-Test) Percolation Tests: Aug. 5, 1994 (3-Tests) Percolation Tests: Aug. 11, 1994 (3-Tests) Borrow Area See Tab 1 for percolation test results and vicinity map. 4. General Soil Profile: 0 - 1 Feet - Topsoil w/vegetaion 2 - 8 - Silty Fine Sand, light brown 8 - 10 - Clayey Sand, light brown See Tab 2 for boring logs provided by Empire Laboratories (Terracon). See Tab 3 for information provided by Soil Survey of Weld County, Colorado Northern Part. 5. Location of Groundwater: Not encountered in Profile Hole, however review the attached copy of a Porter & O'Brien Report on Ground Water Data dated 3 May 1962, Tab 4. 6. Percolation Test Results: Test Hole East - 9 min/inch Test Hole Middle - 12 min/inch Test Hole West - 8 min/inch Test Hole #1 - 13 min/inch Test Hole #2 - 12 min/inch Test Hole #3 - 12 min/inch Test Hole #1 - 13 min/inch (borrow area) Test Hole #2 - 13 min/inch (borrow area) Test Hole #3 - 13 min/inch (borrow area) Use 15 min/inch for Design 7. Missile Alert Facility N-01 is a Class II water site with an existing septic tank and leach field type system. The site is considered Class II because it has a reverse osmosis unit in the water room where Class I sites do not. The flow rate used to size the new septic tanks and the absorption area includes the discharge from the RO unit. DESIGN FLOW: 4 YEAR MEAN AVERAGE 1245 GALLONS PER DAY 1993 MEAN AVERAGE 1133 GALLONS PER DAY HIGHEST FLOW RECORDED DURING 1993 WAS IN DECEMBER-39110 GALS. DIVIDED BY 31 DAYS EQUALS 1261.6 GALLONS PER DAY. 9 9/1.17'59 MAF NOVEMBER - 01 DESIGN SUMMARY Continued For a future building reconstruction project which will increase the size of the facility (not the personnel) we chose to increase the design flow by 25%. 1262 gal. per day X 25% = 315.5 1262 + 316 = 1578 X 150% = 2367 Q = 2367 gal. per day flow (includes RO discharge water) 8. SEPTIC TANK SIZING: 2367 X 1.25 = 2958.75 gal. capacity A 2000 gallon tank shall be series connected to a 1000 gallon tank to equal the 3000 gallon capacity required. 9. Perculation rate for design is 15 min./inch. square root of 15 = 3.87. ABSORPTION FIELD AREA: A = 2367 X 3.87 9160.3 2617.2 sq. ft. 3.5 3.5 Each chamber unit provides 17 sq. ft. of bottom area times 16 units per trench equals 272 sq. ft. per trench. 272 sq. ft. X 10 trenches equals 2720 sq. ft. of absorption area. NOTE The absorption trenches shall be over-excavated by up to 2' to ensure that any bentonite that may still exist from a sewage lagoon pond that was once within this same area is removed. Soil to backfill these over-excavated trenches shall be taken from the on-site borrow area, placed in 6" lifts and compacted to 85% of maximum density at optimum moisture content. Upon completion of the chamber system installation and inspection by Weld County Health Department the trenches shall be backfilled with soil from the borrow area (See specifications, drawings and perculation test results) . 10 94-12'59 ir LCF SITE N - 1 PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS TEST WATER LEVEL TIME PERCOLATION HOLE TIME DEPTH DROP INTERVAL RATE (IN) (MIN) (MIN/IN) East 10:53 17 .25 r- 11:08 19 .88 -2 .63 15 5.70 11: 23 21 .5 -1 . 62 15 9.26 11: 35 22 .5 -1 12 12.00 Middle 10: 54 16.75 11:09 18 . 25 -1 .5 15 10.00 11: 24 19 .38 -1 .13 15 13 . 27 11: 35 20 . 25 -0 . 87 11 12.64 West 10. 57 12 11: 12 14 . 25 -2 .25 15 6.67 11: 25 16 -1 .75 13 7.43 11: 37 17 .25 -1 . 25 12 9.60 ta 91112'59 SOIL ABS ❑ RBTI ❑ N TEST DATA REPORT 1PERTY WHERE SOIL TESTED': JSILE ALERT FACILITY Ng! ADDRESS t 3y/E' 141)/ Coody Ncni TOWNSHIP_ 7 N LEGALLugNE, Sec.X. SaMd Sre '26, RANGE S 8 U1 COUNTY"_Lila ld S«a� SEYswv s� a6 STATE eolaelo (SEE ATTACHED SITE LAYOUT WITH TEST HOLE LOCATIONS,) n 1l SOIL TYPE; SNnd err. C17 ljEcw..:\' /� /o �� p��> > s,rY F;.. P �.L��, /c%yysa. wl / / (2 I,,14 Dv et-,.L) DATES OF TESTS' d-/-Jaq Q9/ TO /449 `I( WEATHER: PRECIP O TEMP /1;d FO'S PERCOI.AF ION TEST DATA FILE a. Ec. d. e._j_ f____ 9`_J_1,ll i. _l_l._._;_ k I. I m. I n. Pre-Saturation Period Percolation Readirngs Results _ Start End -Start — Ilole Oa to Time Date Time Date Time Water Time 11d Warr - Elaps- 1 Lever Ho,e Depth (Mo. Invol ' lropl Percolation (Ile. (Ho. (Ile. (Hn. (Ile. Level (Ile. Level Time Drop Rates t(4,___. _(_n. L .Dav)_ ( in.) Day.l_ "Min:) (lay) Min. ) (in.) Min.) ( in ).. ( ii).). .lion) _(Mi_n._/Inch):_ 57" 08-o4 11,0t., 0805 9:10,.. 4S 0LL05 9 'o,., 9:55,. 7 ii. - 9:55 1104 /0:10 )i eel. 10'1 lire w-a5 4 -ri /5 1 /5 me I, /3mi :rt. /O a5 44'4 /0.'ili .504 1.5 - 11./i — — la./s 3 '1,2" ag04 lase,., or-45 51/2/3 a o, 9:434. dl.3" 9:58.. ag 15 y 7'sg .1' $ 19:13 394 1 /Om:, ,:c I, /0'.13 ir9a .0',d$ 30 IS 1-14 3%4,, i. /J n,nh JO;J 3034 /043 413/0 15 ) i. j ��./, //.7 - 3 4,0" 0B-U4 /.19,4, os-0s 9'45 08O5, 9:45.,. ag'• 10:40- 30" 15 a 7.SM. , nh 1 /O:o0 30 10:/S 33. i5 e2 7.Sm.:-/„;,,:6 10:t5 3.7. ID'.3u 43hi /5 1k 1,Q.,,,:,/u.,.l /0'.30 33,4 r0:45 3 l"5 3n . 04,„/.,,.1, l'(It en late H.7S " , LA Sum of Percolation Rates Signature of Person Conducting Test Average of Rates: Inches per Minute: Address Phone ------ ' 'f 941. t9 i -- i I w 6443. 14M C c P2Pt.w n � x \\---.` lacoZ ..ow rs iil (---"' vs w cwwa w xIn mix iEg iE la co zia r I mN klg - ow z z dpj!II 4mge0Z c c 0Z _� R MZzo _Rh a IrnM U U ppr�y S IL ABS ❑ PBTI \I TEST DA - REPORT PROPERTY WHERE SOIL TESTED" MISSILE ALERT FACILITY N' $I ADDRESS 4341( ',Jed (low.,,y team) NSHIP 1S/V LEGALSw4NE} -SaN01-“:1SUI -SP/SVY- �lI Spa ge, RANGE 58 td COUNTY Ud /' STATE 0o,orweO (SEE ATTACHED SITE LAYOUT WITH TEST HOLE LOCATIONS.) SOIL TYPE' SAhd I , CL / if �1 . 1 a f 1 Flat <Ia,R /0,77 ;5,016 t !s;tj - {1 tOtclh DATES OF TESTS' )0 40 99 TO 1/ 41 7$ WEATHER' PRECIP © TEMP n,d sc { - PERLUI mull IESI DATA rICE _ a. b. c. I d—.I e L (. y J i 1_..h T . _. .. _-. - --- I . ._� k Pre-Saturation Period i Prrco lat tonn Rrad mys Results -- Start Ind ._.— Itole Rate Time Date Time Hate Time lla t:nr Tiniend _ Flaps- Lew.Wate] Hole Depth (Mo. Level el i Drop Pet-relation (Hr. (H0. (Hr. (Mo (II' Level (Hr. I,rvrl Time Urr•p Rates _3i Dav 1�. . in. Da Him.) Dail Hui Min. ' 9-JO a'.Y(n 2'// /1:10 ri--)/ Ito 7 > •' ) iln. ) .ill..,. IMrn /itrchl 1i.;i� as 15 s ,;�� -a i1 .7� trv� 11 f•) air , -4 / 1 !y 1, LL.L1 �y �S 13,,,r�/.c Il:s1 a74 12'11 „)8 ; 1 S.__ I " 1$tiic4 1x.37 a 3374' 3;N3 it-/t ir-/3 g•1/ 1/ y_a.)3 PV 1 /%y"" _i4/ nc� /1:_)7 ,'y:J li '1 S75.l ../ ic) ,n 4 13nu /1.,;(1‘ 453'k I/ S 7 , L43-v l5 1 /s ,gon a7-.1r_Lt_5 / Is/,ne la.c5 '�-- 5r-L..6 3%YI g-I( //:i5 EL //:( . „23- )1:31 JL ThTir - •-jr- .7 //. 31 a it r; ' any s u l (t a7_ r' . 1L / _15a "cli fHal /.i,..��/,nr .J?- 13, 14 Sum of Percolation Rates ____ _ Average of Rates: Signature of Person Conducting fest Inches per Minute: Address ------------------ Phone 2 -_ /J In,n / hC Morrow Apeel). 9!111.,2`;9 c / EXISTING 6" SEWER INSTALL NEW CLEANO SEE DETAIL SHEET 3 / N / SS NO EXISTING MANHOLE TOP EL. 4788.07 INV. EL. 4783.07 IRE TE IE xCORNER POST „4 I_ / OF EL 4788.79 UM EN', N CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL A TEMPORARY SECTION OF SECURITY �a, x i I AS OUTLINED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS. r HARDENED ANTENNA AREA N (ABANDONED) BORROW AREA CIF3 KPILE ?OR REUSE 111 AREA N ANT. N IACKFILLED f AREA CONTRACTOR MAY OPEN A SECTION OF THE LREA, EXISTING SECURITY FENCE FOR AN EQUIP- ' OF THE MENT PASSAGE ONCE THE TEMPORARY FENCE a.. N SECTION IS INSTALLED AND ACCEPTED. I N ' REQUIRED. a • # 4 N borrad /yre4 E - N Lx x x x x —y 91-1759 LOG OF BORING NO. B-1 Page 1 of I OWNER ARCHITECT/ENGINEER U.S. Air Force The Engineering Company SITE WCG,p N-I PROJECT Larimer•County, Colorado Missile Site Sewer System Upgrades SAMPLES TESTS O O ^ J J I- m IILL x H W OH DESCRIPTION E ft _ Z Zr Q I- N m W O 1 3 N 0 O W IX a 0 E 0. 0 1-O `a }LL Oft IL Surface Elev.: ft. o j i 1-- a aim E oa Dofa:.::::::.:i TOPSOIL AND VEGETATION PA (Sandy Lean Clay) — Brown — SILTY SAND TRACF 3.0 SANDSTONE** _ \Light Brown / Bottom of Boring ** Classification of the bedrock materials is based on visual and tactual observation of disturbed samples and auger cuttings. Coring and/or petrographic 4 analysis may reveal other rock types. ,x, THE STRATIFICATION LINES REPRESENT THE APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY LINESII Calibrated Hand Penetrometer" BETWEEN SOIL AND ROCK TYPES: IN-SITU, THE TRANSITION MAY BE GRADUAL. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS BORING STARTED 6-7-90 NL 2 None WD or WS T None AB 1 ferraeon BORING COMPLETED 6-7-90 WL RIG CME-55 FOREMAN ACII SIwL APPROVED LLL JOB #6210100.,.;4244 LOG OF BORING NO. B-2 Page 1 of I OWNER ARCHITECT/ENGINEER U.S. Air Force The Engineering Company SITE WGJ-D N-1 PROJECT -6asiutar County, Colorado Missile Site Sewer System Upgrades SAMPLES TESTS OJ I- IL H W m O DESCRIPTION j IX IX Z \ Z H i- W LL W I S W 3 I N H 0 ZZ C D. U L LL U F0 H }IL OM IL a Surface Elev.: ft. W D D )- IV o0 EL o V o 0. D of 1. TOPSOIL AND VFGETATION PA (Sandy Lean Clay) Brown 2.0 R y - SILTY FINE SAND -' ' Light Brown 5— , . — ,., . 8.0 S'I.AYEY SAND Light Brown _ 10.0 10 Bottom of Boring "It r THE STRATIFICATION LINES REPRESENT THE APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY LINES Calibrated Hand Penetrometer* BETWEEN SOIL AND ROCK TYPES: IN-SITU, THE TRANSITION MAY BE GRADUAL. • WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS BORING STARTED 6-7-90 1L SZ None WD or WS None AB BORING COMPLETED 6-7-90 WLLWI.. - 1 ierracon RIG CME-55 FOREMAN ACII APPROVED LLI. Jon # 12905025-2 91-1759 LOG OF BORING NO. B-3 Page 1 of 1 OWNER ARCIIITECT/ENCINEER U.S. Air Force The Engineering Company SITE 'denier N-t PROJECT _ t6antncrr County, Colorado Missile Site Sewer System Upgrades SAMPLES TESTS O -' -I • N > >il • :H:,•. Oj 1- ID IL H W H DESCRIPTION U. >- E IX Z \ aD W HIL I- 0. 0. U co co 0 1-3 H >-IL U I U. ao Surface Elev.: ft. W D 1 I-- IT 01 O.ID E o IL D m 0. TOPSOIL AND VEGETATION PA te . r (Sandy Lean Clay) _ Brown 2.0 /// c'.AYEY SAND '. % 3.0 Light Brown _ Bottom of Boring y THE STRATIFICATION LINES REPRESENT THE APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY LINES Calibrated Hard Penetrometer* BETWEEN SOIL AND ROCK TYPES: IN•SITU, THE TRANSITION MAY BE GRADUAL. . •^-- WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS BORING STARTED 6-7-90 ' .L None WD or WS [ None AB 1 rerr aeon SZBORING COMPLETED 6-7-90 • E. RIG CME-55 FOREMAN ACII WL APPROVED LLL JOB # 12905025-2 „�,, I 9412'59 59 LOG OF BORING NO. b-4 Page l of l I, OWNER ARCFIITECT/ENC INEER U.S. Air Force The Engineering Company WG� SITE N-1 PROJECT County, Colorado Missile Site Sewer System Upgrades r SAMPLES TESTS * C) J • \ T- O O 1- 1- 0 r;r'6.: J IILL E) Y W W N Z E H DESCRIPTION 0 R Z \ It Z HI.- IL 0 I I W D 1 W I- 0 Z Z 0. I- 0 E 0.VI 03 W 00 1-00 H }LL U2 1L a Surface Elev.: ft. 0 D z )- rc VI m E P a J O a TOPSOIL AND VEGETATION PA f�y _ (Sandy Lean Clay) Brown _ 2.0 _ xr %// CLAYEY SAND 3.0 Light Brown 10, Bottom of Boring .R' rr THE STRATIFICATION LINES REPRESENT THE APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY LINES Calibrated Hand Penetrometer* 'fl BETWEEN SOIL AND ROCK TYPES: IN-SITU, THE TRANSITION MAY BE GRADUAL. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS BORING STARTED 6-7-90 WL g None WD or WS T None AB lierracon RIG RING COMPLETED 6-7-90 WL CME-55 FOREMAN ACII wL APPROVED LLL JOB # 12905025-2 941759 LOG OF BORING NO. B-b Page I of I r', OWNER ARCHITECT/ENGINEER U.S. Air Force The Engineering Company SITE w id N-1 PROJECT tai-tmcr County, Colorado Missile Site Sewer System Upgrades _ SAMPLES TESTS 0 DESCRIPTION LL N IX IK Z \ te W LLl- a 0 IL a a E R a I-0 H >•IL O a IL u Surface Elev.: ft. 0 in Z i- a W CO 0 o a D m a TOPSOIL AND VEGETATION _ PA (Sandy Lean Clay) _ I d. Brown - 2.0 _ SI.AYf Y SAND _ re4 FA 3.0 Light Brown Bottom or Boring g,, ikw rrtT THE STRATIFICATION LINES REPRESENT THE APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY LINES Calibrated Hard Penetrometer* BETWEEN SOIL AND ROCK TYPES: IN-SITU, THE TRANSITION MAY BE GRADUAL. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS BORING STARTED 6-7-90 WL 4 None WD or WS [ None AB i rerr aeon BORING COMPLETED 6-7-90 �WL RIG CME-55 FOREMAN ACII t. W L APPROVED LLL JOB # 12905025-2 9412.9 1 r'' l w , soil survey of n cle Y Weld County, Colorado p. Northern Part } p t p.. r r,, .r United States Department of Agriculture k,; Soil Conservation Service and Forest Service 'h in cooperation with , Colorado Agricultural Experiment Station I , ; ,` . I C 1' C 1 Gle . ph 641259-11 Weld County, Colorado, Northern Part 4—Ascalon tine sandy loam, 0 to 6 percent slopes. this deep, well drained soil is on smooth to moderately dissected plains. It formed in calcareous loamy alluvium. Typically, the surface layer is dark brown fine sandy loam 8 inches thick. The subsoil is sandy clay loam 14 inches thick. The substratum to a depth of 60 inches or more is calcareous sandy loam. In some areas the surface layer is loam. Included in this unit are small areas of Ascalon fine sandy loam that has slopes of 6 t0 9 percent, Olney fine sandy barn, and Otero sandy loam. Also included are some areas of Rock outcrop. Permeability of this Ascalon soil is moderate. Available wafer capacity is high. Effective rooting depth is GO inches or more. Runoff is slow to medium, and the hazard of water erosion is slight to moderate. The hazard of soil blowing is moderate. this unit is used as noninigaled cropland and rangeland. Winter wheat is the main crop. This unit is well suited to winter wheat, barley, oats, and sorghum. Because precipitation is not sufficient for annual cropping, a cropping system that includes small grain and summer fallow is most suitable. Precipitation usually is loo low for crops on !Iris unit to make efficient use of fertilizer. Maintaining crop residue on or near the surface reduces runoff, reduces soil blowing, and helps to maintain soil tilth and organic mailer content. Stubble- • mulch farming, striperopping, and minimum tillage help to control erosion and conserve moisture. Terraces reduce runoff and the risk of erosion and help to conserve moisture. The potential plant community on this unit is plainly blue grama, western whealgrass, sedges, and buffalograss. The average annual production of air-dry vegetation ranges from 500 to 1,500 pounds. If the range is overgrazed, the proportion of preferred forage plants decreases and the proportion of less preferred forage plants increases. Therefore, livestock grazing should be managed so that the desired balance of preferred species is maintained in the plant community. Range seeding is suitable if the range is in poor condition. The plants selected for seeding should meet the seasonal requirements of livestock or wildlife, or both. Other management practices that are suitable for use on this unit are proper range use, deferred grazing, and rotation grazing. If the plant cover is disturbed, protection from erosion is needed. Loss of the surface layer results in a severe decrease in productivity and in the potential of the soil to produce plants suitable for grazing. This unit is well suited to windbreaks and environmental plantings. Supplemental irrigation may be needed when planting and during dry periods. This map unit is in capability subclass lye, nonirrigated, and in Loamy Plains range site. 944.259 Soil survey Weld County, Colorado, Northern Part — dark grayish brown loam 10 inches thick. The upper 15 grayish brown gravelly sandy loam 3 inches thick. The inches of the underlying material is very channery sandy next layer is calcareous very gravelly loamy coarse sa loam, the next 17 inches is channery sandy loam, and 21 inches thick. Below this to a depth of 60 inches or the lower part to a depth of GO inches or more is very more is calcareous very gravelly loamy coarse sand. channery loamy sand. The soil is calcareous throughout. Included in this unit are small areas of soils, on Permeability of the Curabith soil is moderate. Available backslopes, shoulders, and crests of upland ridges an water capacity is moderate. Effective rooting depth is 60 breaks, that have fine-grained sandstone or siltstone r inches or more. Runoff is slow, and the hazard of water depth of 20 to 40 inches; Rock outcrop on shoulders erosion is slight to very high. The hazard of soil blowing is slight. and crests of upland ridges and breaks; and Otero sar The Canyon soil is shallow and well drained. II formed loam and Stoneham fine sandy loam on the lower par in calcareous loamy residuum derived from sandstone. of backslopes and on upland ridges and breaks. Typically, the surface layer is dark grayish brown gravelly Included areas make up about 25 percent of the total loam 3 inches thick. Below this is gravelly loam 11 acreage. The percentage varies from one area to inches thick. Sandstone is at a depth of Id inches. another. Depth to sandstone ranges from 10 to 20 inches. 1 he Permeability of this Cascajo soil is moderately rapid soil is calcareous throughout. a depth of 3 inches and rapid below this depth. Avails Permeability of the Canyon soil is moderate Available water capacity is moderate. Effective rooting depth is water capacity is low. Effective rooting depth is 10 to 20 inches or more. Runoff is medium, and the hazard of inches. Runoff Is slow, and the hazard of water erosion water erosion is moderate to very high. The hazard of Is moderate to high. The hazard of soil blowing is slight. soil blowing is slight. This unit is used as rangeland. Most areas of this unit are used as rangeland. A fee The potential plant community on the Bushman soil is areas are used as a source of gravel. mainly blue grama, western whealgr ass, Tire potential plant community on this unit is mainly needleandthread, and little bluestem. 1 he average blue grama, little bluestem, sideoats grama, and prairi annual production of air-dry vegetation ranges from 700 sandreed. "the average annual production of air-dry to 1,800 pounds. The potential plant community on the vegetation ranges from 500 to 1,200 pounds. Curabith and Canyon soils is mainly blue grarna, little If the range is overgrazed, the proportion of protein bluestem, sideoats grama, and sedges. The average forage plants decreases and the proportion of less . annual production of air-dry vegetation ranges from 500 preferred forage plants increases. Therefore, livestoct to 1,200 pounds on the Curabith soil and from 400 to grazing should be managed so that the desired balan 1,000 pounds on the Canyon soil. of preferred species is maintained in the plant If the range is overgrazed, the proportion of preferred community. forage plants decreases and the proportion of less Areas Ihal are heavily infested with undesirable pia preferred forage plants increases. Therefore, livestock can be improved by proper grazing management. grazing should be managed so that the desired balance Management practices that are suitable for use on tlri of preferred species is maintained in the plant unit are proper range use, deferred grazing, and rotat community. grazing. Mechanical treatment is not practical becaus Management practices that are suitable for use on this the stony surface and the steepness of slope. If the unit are proper range use, deferred grazing, and rotation plant cover is disturbed, protection from erosion is grazing. If the plant cover is disturbed, protection from needed. Loss of the surface layer results in a severe erosion is needed. Loss of the surface layer results in a decrease in productivity and in the potential of the so severe decrease in productivity and in the potential of this unit to produce plants suitable for grazing. Slope the unit to produce plants suitable for grazing. limits access by livestock and results in overgrazing r This unit is poorly suited to windbreaks and the less sloping areas. environmental planting. This unit is poorly suited to windbreaks and This map unit is in capability subclass Vls, environmental plantings. The main limitations are the nonirrigated. The Bushman soil is in Sandy Plains range large accumulations of lime and moderate available site, and the Curabith and Canyon soils are in Limestone water capacity. Supplemental irrigation may be needc Breaks range site. when planting and during dry periods. Summer fallow cultivation for weed control, and selection of adapted 20—Cascajo gravelly sandy loam, 5 to 20 percent plants are needed to insure establishment and surviv slopes. This deep, excessively drained soil is on of seedlings. backslopes and shoulders of moderately dissected to This map unit is in capability subclass Vlls, highly dissected upland ridges and breaks. It formed in nonirrigaled, and in Gravel Breaks range site. calcareous gravelly alluvium. Slopes are concave. Areas are long and narrow and are 20 to 1,000 acres. 21—Cushman Tine sandy loam, 0 to 6 percent Typically, 15 to 35 percent of the surface is covered slopes. Ihis moderately deep, well drained soil is on with gravel and cobbles. The surface layer is dark slightly dissected to moderately dissected plains. II 2`'9 `-Weld County, Colorado, Northern- r'ert Most areas of this unit are used as nonirriyaled Included in this unit are small areas of Olney loamy cropland. Winter wheat is the main crop. A few areas are sand, Ascalon fine sandy loam, Stoneham fine sandy used as rangeland. loam, and Vona sandy loam. This unit is suited to winter wheat, barley, oats, and Permeability of this Olney soil is moderate. Available sorghum. Because precipitation is not sufficient for water capacity is high. Effective rooting depth is 60 annual cropping, a cropping system that includes small inches or more. Runoff is medium, and the hazard of grain and summer fallow is most suitable. Precipitation water erosion is moderate to high. The hazard of soil usually is too low for crops on this unit to make efficient blowing is moderate. use of fertilizer. 11ris unit is used as rangeland. Maintaining crop residue on or near the surface l lie potential plant community on this unit is mainly reduces runoff, reduces soil blowing, and helps to blue prawn, western wheatgrass, sedges, and maintain soil titth and organic matter content. Stubble- buffalogr ass. The average annual production of air-dry mulch farming, striperopping, and minimum tillage help to vegetation ranges from 400 to 1,300 pounds. control erosion and conserve moisture. Terraces reduce If the range is overgrazed, the proportion of preferred runoff and the risk of erosion and help to conserve forage plants decreases and the proportion of less moisture. preferred forage plants increases. Therefore, livestock The potential plant community on this unit is mainly grazing should be managed so that the desired balance blue grama, western wheatgrass, sedges, and of preferred species is maintained in the plant buffalograss. The average annual production of air-dry community. vegetation ranges from 500 to 1,500 pounds. Range seeding is suitable if the range is in poor If the range is overgrazed, the proportion of pr flier condition. The plants selected for seeding should meet forage plants decreases and the proportion of less the seasonal requirements of livestock or wildlife, or preferred forage plants increases. Therefore, livestock both. Other management practices that are suitable for grazing should be managed so that the desired balance rise our this unit are proper range use, deferred grazing, of preferred species is maintained in the plant and rotation grazing_ If the plant cover is disturbed, community. protection from erosion is needed. Loss of the surface flange seeding is suitable if the range is in poor layer results in a severe decrease in productivity and in condition. The plants selected for seeding should meet the potential of the soil to produce plants suitable for the seasonal requirements of livestock or wildlife, or grazing. both. Other management practices that are suitable for 1 his unit is well suited to windbreaks and • -- use on this unit are proper range use, deferred grazing, environmental plantings. II is limited mainly by the hazar and rotation grazing. If the plant cover is disturbed, or soil blowing where the surface is barren of vegetation protection from erosion is needed. Loss of the surface Soil blowing can be reduced by cultivating only in the layer results in a severe decrease in productivity and in tree rows and by leaving a strip of vegetation between the potential of the soil to produce plants suitable for the rows. Supplemental irrigation may be needed when grazing. planting and during dry periods. Summer fallow, This unit is well suited to windbreaks and cultivation for weed control, and selection of adapted environmental plantings. It is limited mainly by the hazard plants are needed to insure establishment and survival of soil blowing where the surface layer is barren of of seedlings. vegetation. Soil blowing can be reduced by cultivating This map unit is in capability subclass Vle, only in the tree rows and by leaving a strip of vegetation nonirrigated, and in Loamy Plains range site. between the rows. Supplemental irrigation may be needed when planting and during dry periods. Summer 46—Otero sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes. -This fallow, cultivation for weed control, and selection of deep, well drained soil is on smooth to moderately adapted plants are needed to insure establishment and dissected plains and alluvial fans. It formed in calcareou survival of seedlings. loamy alluvium. This map unit is in capability subclass IVe, Typically, the surface layer is brown sandy loam 5 nonirrigated, and in Loamy Plains range site_ inches thick. The underlying material to a depth of 60 inches or more is sandy loam. The soil is calcareous 45—Olney fine sandy loam, 6 to 9 percent slopes. throughout. This deep, well drained soil is on moderately dissected Included in this unit are small areas of Stoneham fine to highly dissected plains. It formed in calcareous loamy sandy loam, soils that have a gravelly surface layer or alluvium. gravelly underlying material, Kim and Mitchell soils, and Typically, the surface layer is brown line sandy loam 6 Bushman fine sandy loam. Included areas make up Inches thick. The upper 12 inches of the subsoil is sandy about 20 percent of the total acreage. clay loam or loam, and the lower 10 inches is calcareous Permeability of this Otero soil is moderately rapid. sandy loam. The substratum to a depth of 60 inches or Available water capacity is moderate. Effective rooting more is calcareous sandy loam. depth is 60 inches or more. Runoff is slow, and the • 9/117.:43 " Weld County, Colorado, Northern Part 13E. use on this unit are proper range use, deferred grazing, and rotation grazing. If the plant cover is disturbed, and rotation grazing. If the plant cover is disturbed, pr election from erosion is needed. Loss of the surface protection from erosion is needed. Loss of tire surface layer results in a severe decrease in productivity and in layer results in a severe decrease in productivity and in the potential of the soil to produce plants suitable for the potential of the soil to produce plants suitable for grazing. grazing. This unit is well suited to windbreaks and This unit is suited to winter wheat, barley, oats, and environmental plantings. Supplemental irrigation may be sorghum. Because precipitation is not sufficient for needed when planting and during dry periods. annual cropping, a cropping system that includes small 1 his map unit is in capability subclass Vle, grain and summer fallow is most suitable. Precipitation northdueted, and in Loamy Plains range site. usually is too low for crops on this unit to make efficient use of fertilizer. 57—Renohill-Shingle complex, 3 to 9 percent Maintaining crop residue on or near the surface slopes. this map unit is on moderately dissected to reduces runoff, reduces soil blowing, and helps to highly dissected plains, upland ridges, and breaks. maintain soil filth and organic matter content. Stubble- This unit is 50 percent Renohill fine sandy loam and mulch farming, striperopping, and minimum tillage help to 35 percent Shingle clay loam. The Renohill soil is in the control erosion and conserve moisture. lei races reduce less sloping, slightly concave areas, and the Shingle soil runoff and the risk of erosion and help to conserve is in the sleeper, convex areas. moisture. Included in this unit are small areas of Midway and This unit is well suited to windbreaks and tassel soils. Also included are some areas of Rock environmental plantings. Supplemental irrigation may be outcop. Included areas make up 15 percent of the total needed when planting and during dry periods. acreage. This map unit is in capability subclass IVe, 1 he Renohill soil is moderately deep and well drained nonirrigated, and in Loamy Plains range site. It formed in calcareous loamy or clayey residuum deriver dominantly from shale. Typically, the surface layer is 56—Renohlll fine sandy loam, 6 to 9 percent brown fine sandy loam 4 inches thick. The subsoil is cla slopes. This moderately deep, well drained soil is on loam L'3 inches thick. The substratum is calcareous clay moderately dissected to highly dissected plains. It loam 12 incites thick. Shale is at a depth of 29 inches. formed in calcareous loamy or clayey residuum derived Depth to shale ranges from 20 to 40 inches. dominantly from shale. Permeability of the Renohill soil is slow. Available wale Typically, the surface layer is brown fine sandy loam 4 capacity is moderate. Effective rooting depth is 20 to 40 • inches thick. The subsoil is clay barn 13 inches thick. inches Runoff is medium, and the hazard of water erosio' The substratum is calcareous clay loam 12 inches thick. is moderate. the hazard of soil blowing is moderate to Shale is at a depth of 29 inches. Depth to shale ranges high. from 20 to 40 inches. In some areas the surface layer is the Shingle soil is shallow and well drained. It foamed loam. in calcareous loamy or clayey residuum derived Included in this unit are small areas of Midway clay dominantly from shale. Typically, the surface layer is loam, Shingle loam, and Rock outcrop of shale. yellowish brown clay loam 4 inches thick. The underlying Permeability of this Renohill soil is slow. Available material is clay loam 7 inches thick. Shale is at a depth water capacity is moderate. Effective roofing depth is 20 of 11 inches. Depth to shale ranges from 10 to 20 to 40 inches. Runoff is medium, and the hazard of water inches. The soil is calcareous throughout. erosion is moderate. The hazard of soil blowing is high. I'eirneability of the Shingle soil is moderate. Available This unit is used as rangeland. water capacity is low. Effective rooting depth is 10 to 21 The potential plant community on Ihis unit is mainly inches. Runoff is medium to rapid, and the hazard of blue grama, western wheatgrass, sedges, and water erosion is moderate. The hazard of soil blowing is buffalograss. The average annual production of air-dry slight. vegetation ranges from 400 to 1,300 pounds. l his unit is used as rangeland. If the range is overgrazed, the proportion of preferred 1 he potential plant community on the Renohill soil is forage plants decreases and the proportion of less mainly blue grama, western wheatgrass, sedges, and preferred forage plants increases. therefore, livestock hrdfalograss. The average annual production of air-dry grazing should be managed so that the desired balance vegetation ranges from 400 to 1,400 pounds. the of preferred species is maintained in the plant potential plant cone-tinnily on the Shingle soil is mainly community. western whealgrass, blue grama, alkali sacaton, and Range seeding is suitable if the range is in poor sideoats grama. The average annual production of air- condition. The plants selected for seeding should meet dry vegetation ranges from 300 to 900 pounds. the seasonal requirements of livestock or wildlife, or If the range is overgrazed, the proportion of preferred both. Other management practices that are suitable for forage plants decreases and the proportion of less use on this unit are proper range use, deterred grazing, preferred forage plants increases. Therefore, livestock 951.25-9 The general direction of shallow groundwater flow (0 - 75 feet deep) in the November flight area is northwest which is similar to the surface drainage. The area is underlain by silt and clay shale at depths ranging from 25 to 75 feet with starting depths generally increasing from southeast to northwest (see attached well logs for November flight area). If the soils at the November-01 site become saturated, the water will move vertically until a depth of 12.5 feet where it will then flow laterally in a northwest direction and also increases in depth as it flows north. 1 _ i 941259 CORE LOGS AND GROUND WATER DATA WS-133A Operational Facilities Francis E. Warren Mr Force Base Cheyenne, Wyoming VOLUME II OF II FLIGHT K THRU T 9412-59 i - W.•.* x .i. . . ...,_ , 2 _...."+"--1 , ire:, '•1 , 1 4 t ---•01O PI 5 -[ �I'1:1 ® � � �4 - . :! iI ,A1 t i Y L L J __ L ¢— ." Z J—il�F ! _ ,1 l li !� li r u ' JZ o o • :.. • � � ,� J I- a Q .1 ��s im rl .Q, E' � ' '� l +1 • i 4 - - y Q ♦ ! __r. ! � —ice t t� • - • C�r.m i9 LLL�� .,.. ]G 1- Z Li III Us .E 'ii•: I 31 �.o . {_I • � (n.Y: `.... tl i ` • 1;1164 ,ali..v :vv _l. —s Y_ c_ _v e. • •1 W Y CD _� 1 -- ' • • S '. I-r . • - • ' . OQ. J -I �..,Z. .... ..1.. M.,.. W - W • Q ( • W i J �L 1 $ .. 3 ` > • ► . -�- > :...' l •_. o 1 , ' ® - - . :. C 1•\- • . . -• • r i �. ' � � y •�� d 7 Is - I 1r - , 1 1 0 ♦ a H 911. 2"59 aIL A 1, IL C. kJ LiItjt. IN 0 . P o rte r & Company CON5JLTING EN•GINEEIIS LOS A N G E l f S • : A t . r O R N , A IJFWARK W A R K • N ( W J f o S f r SACRAPIENIO • C A . . r O R N , A ]J.0 East 16th Street Cheyenne, Wyoming May 3, 1962 F. E. Warren AFD GROUND WAlER DATA Site No. 210 1 . Date hole completed 3-31-62 Depth to water: 9(.0 _ feet. 2. Static water level measurements : DEFFIi TO WATER TEMPERATURE DATE (FEET) (DECREES - P.) 4-1-62 Dry 4-8-62 Dry 4-15-62 Dry 4-22-62 Dry 4-�9-62 - - Dry - -- 3. Remarks: • 201 sum' bo ol..a rd • Igo eny.lrr It • oa I{Isr nia • N O r m e n d r 4 7 1 9 1 1.. f .7/4 9412,9 ... �....... - r. e. V.....An __ I• a...' •0000 ........ i1J,19.00 !9.n __. '211 I •'I ... ) a ,.,w.....e.no* . 2,011 Al! r �. I. e .,o ro,n mn.+ J ) --„ _ tel .natln.OVn•on �' .. .••• • ... �. I On T iJh. A111..tat.M i,tb. '.• r....,:.77,r,97:7-..77-7:1-971_ . C. C.AIM t!uIM Ceara! I b ; 19..1^ . nbe. ealr.n , nn ____ 0.9.0•• — 9.I Iw9. . .H-1-_.J.•, .. ..I; ..�"e . — z 9.2 ronno.i 04'. ._ Tun ry 1503 Patti TI . 0 wEe— . .n. .T.: 9 11 F) As o n veenni i.o.. . 000 ; p> ••••:••—J JlT2 r. tll. -. _ v M^W,2. J_ ‘,7'...14,Jal-�9 .9.l _ nn. b • •... ......0000 ♦. F""-.T•I rlra-.•nlnr.l. elll.l> 0— -Le... .... .. I i,.....1..4..•I^P.I, ' 9.1.•9-t',n ...Ins t.', ton. ..^t1.. ' I9.n... • t n 9.11.1-e.nm>• ( Ft If.o'. fl..,f.,ono-.. •... ulnl.a. - ! n Jr. .I - ..Ie... 9.119 ' ; L..e.uw. -I I-] 9 v A .orr 19/60 9a/R• 5k/4- I r- =_I LOT 103/2. It 9111 91),2, Into. _ " . — VV-trwn-ne. _ 1011., r... an, -to-te. .1 n Is.o•. lo' I I — l PP_ s-. -9.7" 1 - e io •..oer.e OJ'. OM -- _: MEMO?EWVWTI�an 9111. 1 —__— .' elan),r 1In or 0101• -. - 1) nr>AN.r I• r• r n 10...•19 2.,', Illm/InnM•• 6/6 • Nab 'nVolg.t e9.4..-. 1\lt --I wet ti•n 39 I :JT a/F. At/R• 11/L. :� • M-IlteAr Hoyle JIM Gee CLAY,CLAY, alalternatingto n- Mil Lana r M>lilt W brown - 20 es. eye U'1.J' I.thiamin, - - r nn dam e. — I H . 2 n nrrnrrA 1.0'. 15 - r 9.s 191119 z_)'. "I CUT WIZ' L•,1N4er .Ilt1r - n.J n:. --I Mr-.Mr-. tr.V•, i.•t Pots stint asas. Ilea M,>irono.palm ea. N e2 — O_ 9T>./6. \1/F. i)/R. J_ r•uiR�1N'.01/er balling Jy 1....9.9..99 Iq'• .. IJ 4'u 2)n .o•0_000 .rn 1212 • .•.• 210 IMT0N•0 WHOM .r..•.. '�......r .•.i•9...i.:. I. 2. Winn M i ....n..• ....a I. 2.Varian M •0000. >In —; . ..N a NIyN WA TEST b A�.,to.N.a 1. 1• nrn.. ..a ._...n. ... W ... Sr DATA •-,, , Ninon tut YP-62 ilo \zu etlt. 91.2.2. 9010. to 0002 n')e' IJ.O 1J I A nun-e.awn 'fly. I 9.a .•e 3 I I I I I I I I I 'MUM I I I I.111 rwe.m,anon. _112,__.. . i m 11/5. \J/6, Ar./e. .I.I:I I• I:I:I:III I III::II ).e 11' _ •{11 I%-4i--r! .o.9.__ .__ 1;0 _ e Ts ,999•9.94 ].A•. r ..I I. ... .I:,i .i. .1 CIA)'YIO silty, ee ..Ie.nl 1 nM-ir.lnee ..01anNeLN,. ... ...... . .....I. .I.1I:111 or..p.I->/e' M 7909' __rooenut>.ort• ray-green.itn - pllw-b.o...Iron u1nW. 7 9.1.6.1•. ::IIII I:::III.: _! -..--,.. . 1. .11 r-_,...I Is 1 1. I to I' I _I 1 :>'L J^/r'. IS/1 ... .. .. I :ill:. .I .III. .w...0.,Per n __ 51 ___--_ I -'� ._..__ll:. ;21-2I:4 :0071^t_.J ).,.w�C , L. ..,e--7700 n. n I I ..:I.l.:l : .!I:I 'i!I:III �� : ' . 7777_ 1.I I )) - 1 Y . :I .! .:I I:'I�I . n...• I I WI. 11 i U' 11 I.N JI II i I e so iM Infti nn r,1..9• bl„', I .� I I .e' 1 . . M• In.w•• .11,111]9.r..n.•9. • I I II IIII III I ' >\bona water 1 1D.. 79.9.1791 19.70 p.>.gyn...1 - 1 • I I. ill I: cn-019.,.1. 1 I ..I! 1' 'I -----07__-007 6) � ' ,, . HI 1.1:I.I.1 . 1 - -------77— I I 1 •n, nn. II ii ; IIIII '.I 1. I 1:1111111! ll --- - - 10 = n.a'v. 1 _ _ IwE IN WNW". 1 _ e 9.'1 9rrn..,re r.1' mamma I.VILLeO _ _ - w91fr•nECllVf rlY CURVE .. is --',j.,. Af.r b.Ma J. _� I rt I1.0'. — 1019. b212 ._ .,. N + ' ,,s- 941239 unlwNO Lou a Oe,rlaM r. nn NP ,I'•e.,.. ..,2.,�.♦ sees.u.,n.....a. . ..J -- I b refit( Patnnc 1511151 onm0. P. 2 Marren An ,. 4 TS_ 2\Refer lc fleet 2. r.• '•l ea` gf 56/6,5""•• a,a coact ,nrr , teoma.n r '5.'55" e. ..„ e. r.,.NI n• 56/6, 70/6. uuraaae �_ . _- R 10.0'. • -_' -2 Drtl1N fait end cwt. 60 1 r, u.212 ...en ..0 r.. ve• 0.c. , ..,..orating cornrow -_-. .....•:. 6.1. .r •De a s.e u `1p.0..a. _�- gwy: silty, Men-bedded 115 —2 1 PC.co0rena 2.1'. Z Pert, ee tely soft. Pale Been ^ 1 R I , •••b•feted Falling•• • 1e Ml'n[1X0 r 1 ,nu 19 • lee yeller and n. - ., sees..,see s , .,..e.. ...r..... .. 65_ p4 R 13.5'. r 1 ) 11 .2, , !- V.Mite �_, @ 15/6. lm/6. — ) - r. __ r...., l 41.64 P. Willcox 7 - _ R IJ.y'.•n ..• mar a. ••., .I. ....n..,.a....,n. 90-• 1 j. 0 a Mil beady, •lI#tlY organic, • -1 1_)/1"Trice* rock bit- ~- - ♦ to recovered 0.9'. preen. gel hail fluid etre,- . R 10.0'. - lotion. mottles e y 95 pllw. II 19 recovered Y.s. R 0'. y SD c.ee tsd i part, eninnwt A t t 15/6, 21/6, 17/6. - --_i BT 90/6. nlnW in pvt, dense, light ten. ' x rt n.l' Drilled rail W etneM. ld = — n 1.a'. 1ao ___- et 9.0'. a PS recovered 1.0'. I =. = T PS recovered 2.1•. S, Yap, trace of.16, - __ PL 10.0'. DAI bO,ntltle,moderately.eft M -] MenYlY hard, Pel.Been. C PR recovered 1.0'. I 105. — 13 - R l o•. _x H rt e.o m 60/6. D/'.. D on 9/6, 29/6, 49/6. triennia=triennia=Dltrna¢Alb 9W2: - suamm: MY-eodded. .odentel> - cemented. moderately soft to order- — '". etelY lard, dark irk). 9nelei 110- thin-bedded, silty,.odoatelY —20 _ R 10.0•. — m moderately to OetelT Maid,dark _ C PS recove red 2.5'. Bats. I—•M PS recov9.0'• 2.5'. g 71'3'5 ' y _ IS_' R9.0•. pals rrd.lepn. _ 0 ' PP neewM 2.V. 25 = R1.0'. 119-' r7 ze'6, 32/6, 50/6. _- : ,ate B0/6. Err rt 16.0•. R I.0 . _ R lo.J'• PS recovered 2.5'. _ PC neee.red 2.5'. 0 ;•- DD 30 R 5.0'. 120- I R 12.0'. 1212 ,e., 212 .,en. 1212 ve,, 212 PORTS.•o'nl 121 P'011P..•0103.11•01 — I. I.Yana.An I' ee n ,.212.........•,......... .....� P. 2. Yarns M ....m. r. ,212 eu..n rile,ai r.,,. r_i +T ". nnn....o, e.. 1 e • Ty •�f, i.nn sn.e u..,., • n�� ,..u.,.,._e.. .,, m r. e.....au..nu.... ., 30 P. e• Drilled fast and smooth. °'4 — Drilled rail arE..00M. _,_e ^ In1916DDR0 D11TS3Slb MD 6l1ALx: J �_ 1 —1 etltetone: thin-bedded, moderately 1'., y '— e ' rs recovered 1.2'. 1 m.n4 moderatmoderatelymoderatelyo4 e, moderately sort to e . - Q R 9.0'. 357A __ n 7,0 . I2$_•' nOwe.stety bed, dark B . the'.; enlo-j ” art T5/5- _'T 1 on 26/6, 31/6. 42/6. _ I bedded, silty, odareuly molt to rt 19 0'. -- 5µ1y, mon tree,of slit. �- R i '. -I eel- hard, dark god. -. _ R IO.o'. bentenitle,ard,raYsP soft M lL h5' 'a moderately hard,pale red-lrwn. - _ —1 1R recovered z.5'. �J PO recovered 2.5'. 130- -1 A R z).2'. bottom or µ1e _ SIT .I S,..,t.O PORDV.ITOI rut - - etwe/mefrm: 6/6 IC Ps recovered 3.5'• - 7 retort or[ter, 110/ 13 _ __ n'9.5'. -7 ._ raid of Nast. 30' r I. g1-r zT/6, )T/6, 45/6. - 7 PYe O<es. R 30.0'. _ - n--tIM L her aval 50� .10.5'. _ - ae.Ytonal eal.enw YYI". 7 N PS recovered 2.z•. _ — _ — SS Y. , __- R 12.0'. - xt - ... n err 61/6,85/6, 11/6- — . raR b, , nMn Ba etlt, * ), '� -- R IS,o'- :.: moderately son to sYlttaly hard, - -__ ode peen. 7 _ ` _ __- R 12.15• _•• 60_3:-..??.; _ -- 0 Ps recovered o.9'. R 13.0'. _ P P8 flowers 14'• y _^ 63_"[-_ y 01 sr,32/6, 49/6, 60/6. y 7-- I rt 13.0'. role Bean. I .7 ' = '.y m :: �� R 13.5'. _ Refer to water Test Oats snot for A j es no nnnry. — pining end/or belling results. M1n.bdYd in ,_ R 11.0'. _ CIO SIAM silt), I P9 I'm,. .1'. - III PaK.moderately @ehr Pay Coo. _, n R 10.0'. - 1 I 73 I 1212 .eel er.o. 212 outP 1212 .,.,..o. 212 .nna Nsa ,p/6 . . . 9,1 2. 7 J- 2 t.IL II On ONION t•-+-...... WATER TEST DATA w, 4-462 we 212 ra9Mtt Ma INIIa�llp n�� fl!:'..I�fEi 3.s hwuntn.s$ 1227.: w to ill. ii miliiiiivii .... _ 4 fir .r.,n1 wow, INT/e' to 130' 40 4n• •I 1-Mthhi IW iii iuuu.L: E!aIO!! i eiiiTtia t R8fl!a. trM" -- esuu,iig it, e 1'. E rd •.i=: ,0....anal"MUM -- :' i! 11 «vi7iiii :rw:..ia ae:.l... iii � a�a. kiln- T.20 !!8 E! !91 ii!!lriiiii i. ,...Rn Cii!j ! `iii �hiliiphiii Ph Ivor voter Ina- 11).22' ::'- eo N n 29 sot w SIMVTE7 .recma P. va11.w WMTER RECOVERY CURVE PORTER A O'BRIEN : I P.ntr . c....nr CONSULTING XNOINESRS 110 b.. 16th Stmt CMnIw. MfwSM Mm T. 1964 ' F. I.Varna AM MAW YAW 01]6 Sits Me. 212 I. wt.neat tool 4-1.62 own.to 121.7 _ tot. a. r..et....n: GRM TO 10.41 NI0,MN,L atTh Mil IMAM" -41 M7.62 113.2 N 1.12.62 29.6 „ 4-19-62 T1.1 33 0.26-62 78.6 94 3.3.62 NE 71 3. 1w..W' 3/7 A7 ��,e G 3Q DRILLING LOG roetsn a N+n•E1e u ••' ,•'••••• [. e.. Verret.M' .n .• ':15„ sr-A n.• am :es I:,,I es cewe see" —.... .. .. - --� - LMII: ben.' nLel Ir1,,.L1•.nn, ! J Lend.lee and,•0th. km LOS.Nell([.L.Lxears• 2.--•. .,,,.,r VItA, numeeu Llil.. IrteNlSr • • r••... • •. •r• !Ine.er.lM4 sudsier. lease., _ m.lern( 13 hard, 90J-,+esn end I •.. . 2yS C.C. Be[V prI111N L®2u,y I U. NrR nW ' M1 l�6'. \ a -�r--... ..i........ .,-r--. . ' — : I w • Yl.n• 6J•D' lyre' -.. :.b totedlalllN 1503 ,3.•77.'-•',1',y ,,, T - j r eTT *ter __• '.,•i•••••. • —T•—' . ., • — BS 1 1 n.7.B'. 1\`/// llO.V 89.0•.• yq .• ••• _••3- �. O. S.ene . V.dolmen. - �d n.CT1 sandy, silty, e110'w .33 Settees @m9L. _ mplLle, brawn. - \-T/B•Wiese'rock bit. 3 la but fluid circle- - 100 1 • - 95- • - ' n T.9'. — d SPT 6/6, 9/6, 1,/6. r. - � - .0..11174100t! r-Lramea.assts., i I y Drilled lest and e.mU. _ :ye.".tnl: „I ly Is moderately=. emend, :. ..rawly hard, dark 100 3 10- SILT: seedy, trace or el*. Care - n•3.c'. sco Ve[. . to.erg dean, tan. 2. • a_ s 10ii _ 0 ape 15/6, 24/6, 32/6. -73 ,y 90 b._ _ it 4.6•. m a.T'lw*Ay, �eY!slater. 110 n 9.0•. LI 'eel ewes•Car. _ s n recovers.r.r. = ' s 11•010 linty,aed@rateb - e eB r«ewred a.o•. _ ntN, nn dente. nun.-b.pm. — __ — l�l E!— _ ttf-- ' III—~. N' dome,nss�ee..s.e"ete of merey.W very - ? err 41/6: 43/6, 49/6. - -- — _- n.y-y 'r--{13 , n.44.5'.• ben u.Mt 2.27-r ~0 Y6 recovered 1.T'• l yy 82! JOt__ 120- .. I 1 1 1 •• 4212 -,., 215 •sail, 4212 ,•.,x.... 215 CI 0*T11w 11 e1O1•" VO.R11lr d OlISWN trial 44 I.I.Marren do '... .,.sus ...............••. .....6 r. 2. 2.rten up ...•.. '215• s•.... .•.a. ._4 U e..... e.....m. _ •s .............. ss i .,.....,............ : �r.,a cee.e�rub., suNT, mealy, ellttly R 6.2'. w td. d, aleur,moderately — _- - ey ud IT@Y. _ x es recovered 2.4'. - SrLnm: nnnoalre,@spin,- - 1�5-- e�ntt4. d.rat.1p hard, Cud to ly - n.12.1'. Inud. W _ 1 err 32/6, 51/6, io/6. _ gay,- n.T.l•. "I_ _ -e P6 recovered 2.5'. IJey. 2L 12.S'. blainated. sandy, r.s r ---ar tiM.1M[Md @Nekton. r ry i.T,. totem e[It's 4144 weathered,sneer-erd• py.Qsn.911 yellow- - nn et in4y.• - It Ts recovered 2.7'. - Dlw/iMha@I 6/6 wit o[Err: 440/\7 � spy 45/6, 47/6, TB/5. — ' 7 Tall of Ern 30I Y�B•0.0. me.d _ -sun.r Et. ).• -b` bit. J = _Famed- nuid l vl IIample f 0-'i.; 5 i0w1 nM•Calned. @lithely �93 1 1 IL 7.4'. . u moYrately•••••W, well- 2 1 . t � bedded, e1 bedded, lO,W Tones., nail, 1001 . w. n' .N.@ S p aLT alga shale _ _ Ww,seYnWly errs, el- , '3 2L B.1'. _ 7y • tMnlrlj"lI'r r ' n p N,-tra ter _ H 7 7 1001 1 rtl.V. _ highly vrwM, lrae sutra. i l _ trot - f. 91'1 67 was, amlwtal lrertlw, n.2.2'. _ Mindy nth row Nta lmNlar I . nM.Oaln.d sands *tonne, toter to Vets.[•.t Data shoot for aerate hard, Eral-non WA Isom pumping ud/er belles results. b - mocart Wb -� I : 1 2L T.1'. -)• 7, 1 _l. I _ 100 51 7.3' TS 4221 red wed. 215 1212 ......t 215 r..u•. mew... JVe5 941254 2 z I. 2.Warren An •0.8•1•s WATER TEST DATA enc })1-62 .__ tit__ 215 .road 1212 'I • •t..w.o.ne.er _1LC . :Low: t0 . eve I.. ... � ......... tb.W ten so we.1 .-vr to 130' . ...... So I I 5°name stilt,1100.1E -- ' • yg re,1...._... o _•••..•••• cwt. J" pliant perfont.d 1.0. ........: .r cuing sot to 6o. .twr winos ..•.•••• 1 Yllor r ones. . )•1.0. r 20' how M•'r•.4�' 4Y nur level- 110.4' ....... .. 141..4;1.-t TW.Wreton . 5Y .00 _ .. ..�tKb1.T.1...� Po oo so TOPE IM 110101111 54050104 0.Altana WATER RECOVERY CURVE PORTER • O'BRIEN CONSULTING INCINSIRII • 1.10 rut 16th Stn.t Cll.eeue.VAIN mar 3, 0962 2. 2.Worsen en mows 14.1S!Dote, sat. Mo. 215 . I. Dan nol.<avl.nl )-11-62 _ 'opt: to Inter. 121.0 _ (sot. I. sut.<n.nr Ia1 .v..er.nnts nemm TO VYtfe termrenu is (flit) (PEOPLES • 1.1 4.1.62 110.4 5) Y-0-62 09.0 )4 Y-15.62 'A.T 55 1-22-62 99.2__ 56 4.29-e2 90.5______ se 3. ova N 7 2,3 941.259 DRILLING LOG • ".�.""" •cony...nor' t. e. .e<Y! ,..��e'. r.d oer•..••• t.e bb. ."•.a c•w .ante utuvm nne.t memos. y. e. v,-m.ve _ w •I, , •.••:•_._--•.• ' •r.�_ •_ e••••••'''IW/t...reit• r9¢e ..., .. ••••,. Refer to went 1. =4 re e.5•• LOS awauR,eauen.a _ _... .. _i _ -willed rut nod sou. , rr.•• v• nx....o ..., .•.,.. C C• eedh wl llry Ctssav: & I �_ nlo.C•. • 1e 9 • _ 11 Pe ennnN 2.5'. men. -._ MI: thin-bedded, silty. dandy. --iR 10.3'.CP • •r. t .. . . ., wemtely hard. dark nay. - I • Y-bled•• •••hilly 1510•• .' 30 _ - 6FR n.5'. •P-63 r. vwaR • -r1 = re 11.5'. 1 SJ.,• r••••..In •... %,:......, ...., , ..33.,-62 J.bt v.volt. .:.. ,.. .. _ I --•L 0 17,7.1-Surface uwols. Im 10 MOM NN: silty, - _ - T !6 neenn6 3.S'. Slightly oriole hbrume . rock blt-felixn fluid - - _R l3.er. = circulation. I _ -_ IRTW6m®CIAI eWi MO - -- - Bwll®TRIR: flee-drained, wilt.. —"w err er 10)/5 1lIMITO h: Clay aher ULln- 7._R err 3x/6. 35/6, 31/6. rg<nttl<.fen-dr, nedentely - b new/5. j - MNNr LLMI,antntely inn 3L 0 . her, dark dray. _ R'enn i. ealdw•alhd.wden4lr Gerdy. pale erne. Biltat t1l fine willed rut ant smooth. 10 Seedy in Pet, slightly septa. -_ R 1.0•. 1 ,1607.- friable. .adedadab Soft, Pllsoded'. v n recovered 3.0'. .- = u 6 recovered 1.5'• - ___FL 16.0'. + - -_ n 1.e'. 105_`_ - n 16.0'. 6utlta ai wsntely wort to c ert a/6, R/e, P/u. I _ — -en 1Wp.ry. Iy extlt: thitebNeN. earbar.5Wi. - no '- moderately hard, ink bray. - n 15 J'• 20 __ n 5.0'. 1-_'i ___ = V n recovered 2.5' FL 5.0'. - Clay.hale. = I - v I'd recovered t.3'. er J.5/. 11- �c�SPY 100/t, 3S -� slightly[ nn-. rie, ,ut>r -- err 35/6. rW/J. _ I - .M recovery. ,Ilya.rented.no.friable, ry J-O'� _ .oemtey wort. mr. _ _.R R•5'. R..O'. - 6iltntdnu r ry recovered 3.5'. ItF I z l n.ni*v.red 1.9'.•m X9 3 W 1313 �•�1,,1 4'I3 .r.. .... n.•ere•, Y1 POMTea 6 Ceasel.w•_ ' h" 2 , F. C. Warren dye 309 �•.. It r. d. w.mn oe .... 209 l _ _ __ _— _-.— Lr ...se; • \ ,n •r ";::.1_'•.... ,t ni I...�waled be'•aed moth. Is _ !tern:. .ere.... �_ _ I MUN Ru•aN•ronotn. IS1td Clay lisle AO weed, 11 Clay lisle; thin- __R 5.cr. oxide, Lionl.moderated, Srfn 0 .PS recovered 3.5'. _ - e.rN nMlned•rlent.ly non. PL Se'• - JyghTUte: rims-Cn.me. •tlt>• - T jkI R 10.6'. •5+.�I ix;e green. nitwtenl flM �_-_ n Intly enentS. fena.l, j--4 BIT l0/fi• rW/I. xNi e, part, t.1,oft. edaantNr -F MT 6i/ti. IW/4. reamUlY herd. InY- - I -- R FL 5.5•. friable. moderately rote. FL 6.0•. -5- -7.1 ye-Iw-inn. - < J L e1 rxenM 3.0•. 1 I n re were 3.T. J": K_ti5,_ bottom of Hoe. - 7.: CANARD MCITPATION TillT F<3 -_ R T.0'. - a __ 2 J n n vered 3.0'. - = bidert sn 6/6 weight or wan Ito/ a5 Vie -_ R T.5/6 _ - Tall er Reiman ]0' R_ ..z.,'--s. SIT 75/6, IW/I.. - R R B.0'. - - re-Pitcher Beagle - - R-?load teal 5p ___ R 9.0'. __ - f_. sa.ia silty.Neeews• L Fe recovered 3.5'. - thin-hWwd,.Nentnly hard, - 5 F en la'/L. _ n e.0'. - - n 10.0•. - r1 I = o n toe•. - 65 ,-. — -T eSITTO/6. 100/h. _ R 10.5 .10.0'bedded is pert, lightly to - TO - P. ente1>assented,.odmhll n 11.0'. PR, PY. - 3 R• r• ered:J'. , - ,_ . . S0'• • TS 7 I _ rvb.i ---.---..... - -___- 1113 e.....en209\ .nerve 1212 .•y•von W°. b . e •• ?s4 gal 2:7C1 r. I. Vmm1U. WATER TEST DATA n.n 4.342 — uq Pass, 4212 0 .lwe.•.n nnm 19.5 . '!If!-• auv.rn.n..na 121.0 •o ........ ......... ... •w 6.6 w ;. • .;. •sawn.0..0, t-T/6' to 1p• 22 _ _ ae....w.67290.290... •' ..�R-n bee.a.T 2.t.5.a j.se .'. N �.1: 4L;l : (: 11 C •au.• .. : 3: j ; . _:Ii. ' 3f . 1 '1 IIu •• T ilium,.WA - 3- IS'a N'2It bow.voter leve . 53.7. • : :C 7.: ] 'S .�• �s tws.nnve ..53. .. t . -...•.• CSLIClCSASCSL=•. a 90 •p TIME M WS0915 N2222200 F. wino= WATER RECOVERY wpm/ PORTER 4 O'ERIEN CONSULTING ENOINSIR6 I r 11 W 0 t 160;treat Na"Pa. VIa1N Itt T, 2962 F. L. Van."AEI rictus WAR Can Sit. Mo. 209 I. oat.•1• CMT 4-3-62 "soar. le 56.0 _ IMI. 1. ltn.<..t.9 , ...out-aroma 059905 22INTOntn.wIw -9- Innt3 r0ErmAn •P.1 y_v_(¢ 53.7 53 4-11-6233.5 N i.10.6i 53.4 u 6-23-60 53.6 51 5-2-6t 53.7 54 3. 0 r5 Afrie, lif 91.1.259,__ _ OneCDS DRILLING Luti ".wr."a..... a.........er..ex f. e. Ynnev Pn .n.. ..4ss. .ww•....r.u..... •'.� • u• roan YwP2 nrtuf Pvla.. I.•.Warren an L. Infer to neat 2.... „ ... _L.. ••••••• en 62/,••••••• ,lo0/..... •.•••1 I .II Mina"',,, Minn . . ,,.s. 11 11....• Drily On Ina mien. LOP*MUM Cann* �� I ... a..e.w 1....@P..w . . .. ., e0 _. IL 9.0•. r , ,. .. .relo.1.w .0.C.'nth Drilling ...• a . _ • I- n manna 2.1.'.•\`._} hang 1702 It •.n. 19 ° �S$4 ate .e...•I ... .., __ _PALO - —_ R lOp/6. 262 _ot n• x_ a arse.. e.. •••• m •• ......ay.......,,nn em Te tiaN h.etan. __ n 11.0'. °� inn nab slsei.Y.lira =- welas..peln. -� M reroute tr. J'. tan• A.7/e•name net tit- w1 bon Mild eieen _ Drums Des r even. S_ML Man near, 0 11.nmi,loose, ___- lotion. -- v w>6/6, 7e/6, 91./6. not . - •_- J/6, 3/0: !/6• =.= _ - are Drill-fast and neon. 1•• _ - 10- >s m COlli nag oll'i, - n 1.0•. _ n 11.0'. I Y n neon..1. '. - Ctmillt,ease downs tole _- '',.= 2•6-Inns. 7 • M revere..1.0'. Mereous,nation'lunar In silty is Ys, T. DSllN else @N neon. -to 7-- cbfeall tore to bard, mine.. t • 1 = -, I_ onm/6. 1m/6. Ca 10 CUM l®, sing, ---NT n/5• _ DIYgn`lIn tent W,pL na. 7 b nenen. 7. m7 3ID R 16.0'. -- nob,a.e., 1.r. n J.J'. IL M6. --__ _ = i h manna 0.o'. 7. C M roman P.0'. �__n1.0•. _- _ M n n.. ..p l.1'. tl� -- I n roan..•.5'. P m CON Iii uty, �'t-NT$16, ee/6• .7 i WI C7/6,66/6, h/6. i gmiut,net aesee.0.11 ono - _ = n 17.9•. - semi. n 5.a•. - ____ = = W n enamel•.J•. �� r n mermen 1.1'. 120 - .. 1C12 snows. ILL 1112 , 211 - peat."a e•le.l n Nana..nat.a .......n. ......... ...I..a..-...w wom',Assn.**,�' • ...,..,...-i......xnJ.6.Unuf1�.�t I•. 211 a_j' P. Varna In e.... 211 j A L Venn An •n^ IP, IS 70 9 _ a Po neuron 0.9'• SIMI, W as46, Ilia) In past. prima tilt W )Ip A COMM�. pal. - __ nanny y eeeulo.a_ellebnlb., 771 i te..bW,ten - eoontot11uN to bout goon. rna-6.we. _ ° n Inane 1.9'• 12. J r;•••.:,-74 En DMA. D CL CAT. .ear. A p, very @tan. 1-1.- to 19/6, i/6, !3/6. __ n 19.0'. not tees w.. _ tr11L6 N1.an,mie.6. TM m WARM IND eWq, nn _ —J __ n 6.0'. .Q bast' va 1. - i n nasrer*.1.1'. n 16.0'. 1 n.eeenM 2.J'• 1397 to se ME WS, nom, 51157. nn y - _ lotto of Iola WI - 7. nap nonATIN Pr - 6/6 • n nearer*.1.e•. -' night N Simon 1-N t _ - loll.f•re. JO' - 6- w 29/6, A/6. 65/6. - 7. Po R. MIA Loon -titan .1 - - T. . n6.5•. m " re neenna 1.J•• - - • n manors.2•9'• — 7f - n al 1pisend, silty h past. _o- en 19/6,n/6, T/6. - tn. ,nemiteal dates - I �. as—,al-.selt hook pings. t j — 60 _ n 5.0'. _ °J 330. Ire 1e/6, 51/6, 31/6. —_ ~ .J _ bin fa Waternot Data asst fn FL 1.0'. _ pining mane telling ewaln. , 70 T_. _ i ■- n.nearetnl Y.P'. 17, 'j � _. fl 1111.., 1.212 we mom W N 1 ell moil moose. 211 9412... P. 2 Warne An • imam WATER TEST DATA 9er[ 3-30-62 •N 111 IMAtt 1212 •. I .1;;11.1I'• Ui 1.Lw0.[AL at nut AA n •. "' • .-...1=1: 1T1:. ewe LSAL 41 1410111 127.0 n•rCto 'It: . 11. .. : �i • II!1• twwtnaer pal 6-V9• te19-0'. ....!':: .I': ' • 4T/F•19.3' te 170.0' iag t 0.11.101C ate LIHll9 0 ::IA !. SO _ .� `�• .•"• 1•:: � 1 e C n r L0. erfa nua 91tttle ti!1. -r- a ei seeing est to 1P1' after M11t'V.r -4no t memo ul.r- r l.n. N to• .• •ee +,~ . ip::; N tour rater level-120.1' • TeERNRIRy.- 1t• pya ° • o a• 40 e Tea I NINutll „amen. P.Elliott WRYER RECOVERY CURVE PORTER I. O'BRIEN 0 I •...... . tiepin). CONEULTINO INOINEIRS 120 fart 16th Sint CMeent 1170111.41 SN1 1. 1962 I. 3.Wren An MAUI.WWII WiEl site W. au 1. Wt.nl. 3'1°42 Ogtn t.ne.. 120.0 _ ear. 2. Stitt.Veto! level werwnnesi NMI to lour 1CMSMTIM DAM (15171 0E0we -a.1 3-3161 120.1 N 4T-63 119.2 11 41463 123.6 31 1-2142 123.6 1t 1-22-62 119.2 3. mete Nsii .1 3r 941739 Exploratory Water Well Drilling at Launch Control Facilities for WS-133A Operational Facilities Francis E. Warren A.F.B. Deployment Area Wyoming Design and Construction Data AIR FORCE BALLISTIC SYSTEMS DIVISION AIR FORCE SYSTEMS COMMAND UNITED STATES AIR FORCE LOS ANGELES 45, CALIFORNIA PORTER & O'BRIEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 941259 r_*'r . WELL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION DATA N-0I EXPLORATORY WELL DRILLING WS-133A OPERATIONAL FACILITIES F. E. WARREN AFB, WYOMING I. SITE DESCRIPTION A. Site No. 210 is located in southeast Weld County, Colorado, on a gravel road, 1.5 miles north of the town of Raymer and 66.5 air miles southeast of F. E. Warren Air Force Base. Topographically, the general area is a moderately dissected, gently rolling plain with maximum relief of 300 feet. Moderately developed regional drainage trends to the northeast via South Pawnee Creek. The site is in a pasture on the south rim of the South Pawnee Creek Valley. Drainage is to the northwest on slopes of 1 to 2 percent. Maximum relief within the site area is. approximately 10 feet. III. WELL DEVELOPMENT r. ' A. General The well was drilled to a total depth of 1,188 feet with a Failing 1500 rotary rig. The well log is included as a part of this • ' report. From the ground surface, a 12-1/4-inch hole was drilled to a depth of 31 feet and 10-3/4-inch conductor casing was set and cemented to the ground. From this depth the well was advanced to a total depth of 1,188 feet using a 7-7/8-inch bit. Water bearing sandstone was encountered at 930 feet. Bail tests were made upon completion of drilling and indicated that the well would provide a sufficient yield. All work was supervised by Porter & O'Brien geologists. 1 941259 lzf , . 1 B. Geology The stratigraphic section encountered is as follows: Depth(feet) Stratigraphy Sample Description 0 - 56 Lance formation Silt and clay shale. 56 - 104 Fox Hills sandstone Sandstone. 104 - 1,188 Pierre formation Shale and sandstone. ' III. WELL CONSTRUCTION A. General The well on Site No. 210 is a cased hole in a consolidated formation. For the casing, 6-5/8-inch 0.D. pipe was used; it is perforated, or slotted, between the following depths from the surface of the ground. 922 feet and 944 feet 958 feet and 980 feet 1,033 feet and 1,083 feet A conductor casing of 10-3/4-inch pipe is cemented to the well casing and into the ground. Details of well construction are shown on a a; drawing, which follows. • • } 2 9111.7;43 B. Pumping Tests After the well was developed, pumping tests were conducted. Results of these tests are as follows: Pumping Rate Pumping Water Level Static Water Level (gpm) Depth From Grade (feet) Depth From Grade (feet) 0 _ 557 5 568 415 3 580 617 C. Sterilization of the Well Following the completion of the pumping tests the well was disinfected by introducing a chlorine solution into the well and agitating it with a bailer for approximately one hour. The concentrated chlorine liquor was prepared from granular calcium hypochlorite (H T H). IV. PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF WATER Physical and chemical analyses of a water sample procured from the well at the time of the final pumping tests were made by the Chemical and Bacteriological Laboratory of the Wyoming Department of Agriculture, Laramie, Wyoming. Hydrogen sulfide and carbon dioxide field tests were conducted by Porter & O'Brien personnel. .yI 3,1*tr. eh 941259 Itc- PHYSICAL & CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF WATER SAMPLE WRra, NO. 2100 F. E. B WAi-le N-01 Field Tests PPM Hydrogen Sulfide 0.75 Free CO2 None , Analysis on Semple as Received Item PPM Item PPM . pH 9.2 Suspended Solids 74 Free CO2 None Dissolved Solids 1140 Total Iron 1.5 Chlorine Demand 0.91 Total Manganese None • Analysis on Filtered Sample Item PPM Item PPM Turbidity Less than 5 M-Alkalinity* 655 Color (APRA), 2 Bicarbonate* 405 Sodium & Carbonate* 250 l Potassium (as Na) 422.0 Hydroxide* None Calcium 16.0 Total Hardness* 52 Magnesium 3.0 Carbonate Hardness* 52 Iron None Non-Carbonate Hardness* None Manganese None Organic & Volatile Matter 24.0 Aluminum None Arsenic None Chloride 227.0 Barium None Sulphate .. 14.0 Copper None Silica (as 8102) 15.0 Lead None Nitrate (as NO3) None Selenium None • Fluoride 3.7 None one „''`` P-Alkalinity* 125 * As CaCO3 4 owt • r; q ' iv • u. 941239 V. DISCUSSION OF WATER QUALITY The physical analysis of the water sample procured from Well No. 210 discloses that the turbidity is less than 5 parts per million. Pumping the well during the period of construction of the launch control facility should reduce the turbidity to near zero. According to the drinking water standards of the United States Public Health Service, water with a total solids content of not more than 500 ppm is of good chemical quality, excluding other chemical and physical limits. A concentration of 1,000 ppm of total solids is permissible under certain conditions. From the chemical analysis of the sample of water taken from this well, the total solids content was found to be 1,214 ppm, of which the dissolved solids comprise 1,140 ppm. The combined sodium and potassium content is 422 ppm, most of which is assumed to be sodium. Sodium in excess of 200 ppm may be deleterious, and inasmuch as the total solids content should be reduced to a concentration less than 500 ppm, demineralization by means of a hydrogen cation exchanger is recommended. The large quantity of bicarbonate suggests the use of a degasifier as the second step in this process, to remove the carbon dioxide produced; however, the small water demand could make the employment of a highly basic anion exchanger attractive for removal of this carbon dioxide. X;f''I�S•'*row ^-� 5 s<:a 941.2 59 .Yfv j I• Iron content of the raw water is 1.5 ppm, whereas that of the filtered water is zero; disclosing that all of the iron has precipitated upon exposure to the atmosphere. The amount of iron should be limited to 0.3 ppm, according to the standards of the U.S.P.H.S. Althougi the piping system will be closed, it is probable that the larger fraction of the iron compounds will precipitate upstream from the demineri.lizer and foul it; consequently, the use of the sequestering agent, sodium hexametaphosphate, at the well, is recommended. There is no manganese present. • Although there is a large amount of fluoride (3.7 ppm) in this water, its concentration could not be injurious to adults. The enamel of the teeth of children, only, is susceptible to excessive amounts of fluoride. Chlorination will remove the hydrogen sulfide, which is present in an objectionable quantity. • A total hardness reading of 52 ppm has classified this water as "soft". The water yielded by this well is not potable; therefore, it should not be consumed prior to treatment. It is satisfactory for the requirements of construction; • • 941759 A C C 4 - n: z z • w = N z W Z W O W 2 ' J w N C CO I / WATER WELL J ` CORE\ HOLE/ ACCESS ROAD fP l ¢ J SUPPORT BUILDING Q • ae d Qa N • sgiY C. ,el..;;;, - PORTER a O'BRIEN SITE NO. 210• � `� I PROJECT NO. 4220 DATE: AUG. 1962 LOCATION PLAN NO SCALE 941259 NO. 10 GAUGE STEEL PLATE / WELDED TO CASING. , 1 CASING CLAMP �� GRADE ELEV. 4790.6 92 ;1 ;4'ift %:P it • u 0,;,i :,..'. {tipfi X, 10.75" 0 D. 31.2 LB CONDUCTOR CASING -.. rC 1.�; I?:It -- CEMENTED TO WELL CASING AND IN- *j'y.1" 4S' V1..1 ' N TO GROUND. L :.�in BOTTOM OF CONDUCTOR _ti ,.44;"t• • • CASING ELEV. 4759.6 __ � i CEMENT RETAINER . t • $ '1 t F• 1 7 STATIC WATER LEVEL ELEV. 4233.6 V ' k V PUMPING WATER LEVEL ,i k \ ELEV. 4222.6 AT 5 GPM CEMENTING COLLAR- 4 o o _CASING TO FORMATION BRIDGING BASKET AT ELEV. 3911.6 • TOP OF PERFORATED CASING ELEV. 3866.6__ 6-5/8" 0.0. API L5 GR. B 18.97 LB. WELL -- • III CASING 6.065" I.D. BOTTOM OF PERFORATED ,•--- 'C \.-__-.7 CASING ELEV. 3846.6 III TOP OF PERFORATED CASING ELEV. 3832.6 III BOTTOM OF PERFORATED • III _CASING ELEV_ 3810.6 TOP OF PERFORATED CASING ELEV. 3757.6 BOTTOM OF PERFORATED PERFORATION SCHEDULE CASING ELEV. 3707.6 8 SLOTS I/8"X 3" _.- . _._._. __._ ._...__.-_.......___ ON 6- INCH CTRS. BOTTOM OF WELL CASING ELEV. 36041 CEMENT PLUG ---y4+ 4 f ` BOTTOM OF WELL ELEV. 3602.6 PORTER a O'BRIEN WELL NO. 210 �- PROJECT NO 4220 DATE AUGUST 1962 WELL CONSTRUCTION I NO SCALE 941259 DRILLING LOG • PORTER i O'SRIEN • CONSULTING ENGINEERS I. PROJECT SHEET1 AIR FORCE BALLISTIC SYSTEMS DIVISION F. E. Warren AFB OF 7 AIR FORCE SYSTEMS COMMAND 2. LOCATION (COORDINATES OR STATION) LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA S. HOLE NO. (AS SHOWN ON DRAWING TITLE • FILE NO.) A. DRILLING AGENCY SITE NO 210 N-01 Express Drilling Company S. ELEVATION G. SOIL SAMPLING 7.CORING FOOTAGE S. TOTAL DEPTH OF FOOTAGE HOLE 4,790.6 Ground -- 1,188' 9. SIZE AND TYPE OF BIT 10.MFR. DESIGNATION OF DRILL II. NUMBER OF SOIL SAMPLES As Noted Failing 1500 PENETRATION -- TUBES 12. DEPTH TO IS. TOTAL CORE RECOVERY 14.DATE HOLE INSPECTOR (S) STARTED 6-22-62 W. Quinn 557' -- FT. -- COMPLETED 7-18-62 M. Cliff DEPTH I•II CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS CORE ORR REMARKS (DESCRIPTION) RECOV- SAMPLE EAT N0. (WATER LOSS,DRILLING,ETC.1 0 SILT: clayey, dense, trace of — 12-1/4" Tricone rock sand, gray-red. -, bit - gel base water circulation • Sampling at 10' 20 CLAY SHALE: silty, moderately = intervals. .. , � .-- soft, variegated red-yellow-green. - Set 31' of 10-3/4" conductor casing with 7 sacks cement. 40 random streaks. 7-7/8" Tricone rock bit. Tbp of Fox Hills Sandstone 6o _ • SARISWUNE: fine-grained, soft to firm, moderately porous, rusty- _ brown, iron stained, slightly - calcareous - contains streaks of 8) hard, very calcareous, well cemented • sandstone, some random.selenite crystals. = • • 100 Tbp of Pierre Shale 120 • - .. vein J• :,e. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PROJECT HOLE NUMBER 210. 941259 )ORTER 6 O'SRIEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS S.HOLE NO.(AS SHOWN ON DRAWING TITLE G PILE N0.) F. E. Warren AFB SITE NO. ?10 2 OP I 'DEPTH pi OF MATERIALS CORE OR R u (DESCRIPTION) RECOV• SAMPLE ENT NO, (RATER LOSS,DRIL LINE,'TC.) 120 SHALE: silty, laminated in part, 7-7/8" Tricone rock carbonaceous, pyritic, dark gray, bit. with streaks of sandstone; fine • - grained, porous, glauconitic, green- 1 - gray• 160 SHALE: silty, carbonaceous, dark • gray with white specks, moderately soft, with thin streaks of l80 sandstone; fine-grained, tight, hard, tan to buff. - 290 SHALE: silty, moderately soft, • slightly carbonaceous, dark gray. 220 • 240 Contains thin streaks of hard, gray-white sandstone; shale, more • silty than before. 260 SHALE:_ gray, slightly silty. • 280 SHALE: gray, bentonitic, sane . thin streaks gray-green bentonite. 300 220 210 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PROJECT . HOLE HUMID 9412'59 • PORTER 11 O'ORItN CONSULTING ENS( S.MOLE NO.(AS SHOWN ON DRAWING TITLE [ FILE NO.) 3 F. E. Warren AFB sac NO. 210 DP 7 pp 1e SOX DEPTH y CLA//1►(CATION OP MATERIALS CORE OR REMARKS IV (DESCRIPTION) RLCOV• SAY►LG (WATER LO/S�DRIL LING�[TC.) .+ ERv NO. 300 .. SHALE: soft, gray, silty - traces — of tan, hard limestone. — 7-7/8" Tricone rock bit. 320 — Shale as above with hard, dense, — sandy limestone lenses. — • 340 - SHALE: very silty, with trace of bentonite and dense, brown limestone. 360 SHALE: gray, very silty, micaceous, —_ some streaks very bentonitic. e 380 — : �� SHALE: gray, soft, sticky, very = bentonitic, slightly micaceous. 400 — .7::"' 420 Shale as above - traces of dense, _ tan limestone and tan bentonite. — 440 Shale as above, with traces ochre, _ concretionary siltstone. _ 460 Traces of fossil fragments. _ 480 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PROJECT MOLL MUNSER• 4220 210 941259 1 ITER i O'SRIEN CONSULTING [NGI S.HOLE NO.(AS SHOWN ON DRAWING TITLE G FILE NO.I tN[[T4 F. E. Warren AFB SITE No 2JA) oF___I Y 005 CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS CORE • OR REMAINS DEPTH 0 (DESCRIPTION) RECOV- SAMPLE (WATER LOSS,ORILIING,ETC.I ERV N0. 480 sHALE: soft, sticky, very 7-7/8" Tricone rock bit. bentonitic, some greenish bentonite, trace of very fine-grained, dense sandstone and very calcareous, 500 _ light gray siltstone. 520 SHALE: gray, slightly silty, finely micaceous - traces dense, tan lime. Shale as above with traces pale gray, very micaceous siltstone. 540 560 SHALE: gray, slightly micaceous with thin interbeds of gray, soft siltstone. Random bits of very hard, dense, fine-grained sandstone. 580 Traces dense, creamy, crystalline limestone. SHALE: slightly silty, clayey in part, moderately soft, dark 600 gray, with streaks of hard, dense, slightly calcareous, light gray — siltstone. 620 _ Streaks of hard, fine crystalline, light gray limestone. 640 Trace of fossil fragments. 66o • CM OFFICIAL USE ONLY PROJECT 4220 HOLE NUMBER 210 941259 N.' . • PORTER i O'BRIEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS S.HOLE ROANS SHOWN ON DRAPING TITLE G PILE NO.) F. E. Warren AFB SITE NO. 210 . or 7 2 % Sox DEPTH CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS CONE ON REMWRIS mi (DESCRIPTION) R1COV• wino (WATER LOSS,DRILLIMG.ETC.) ENT No. 660 SHALE: slightly silty, clayey in ' 7-7/8" Tricone rock bit. part, moderately soft, dark gray with streaks of limestone; hard, • dense, light gray. 68o - :: • Shale as above with traces of tan, dense limestone. 700 • Shale as above with a few thin _ interbeds of gray siltetone and very fine sandstone, hard, 720 calcareous. Shale as above with numerous interbeds of fine-grained, soft to hard, salt and pepper sandstone - « ••( - poor to no porosity. 740 Shale as above with a few thin interbeds of hard, calcareous siltstone. kb 780 SHALE: gray, silty, slightly • micaceous, traces of calcareous siltetone, tan, crystalline limestone and very bentonitic tan shale. SHALE: soft, muddy, gray with thin 780 siltatone interbeds. Shale as above - only a trace of siltstone. Coo SHALE: gray, silty, slightly micaceous with interbeds of gray calcareous siltstone, traces of dense crystalline limestone. Shale and siltatone as above with 820 much very fine to fine-grained sandstone - porous salt and pepper sandstone and very calcareous •• I gray sandstone. • As above with many chips of dense, . tan limestone and trace of rusty- 840 brown, fine-grained sandstone. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PROJECT 4220 ROLL HUMMER � • 941239 • PORTER i O'BRIEN CONSULT INS INC S.HOLE NO.IAS SHOWN ON ORAWINS TITLE S FILE NO.1 SN[ET6 F. E. Warren AFB sin NO. 210 or — - I 16 SOX DEPTH CLASSIFICATION OF IALS CORE OR 1OESCRIPTIONI MELON- SAMPLE (WATER LO$R,ONIL LIMS.E TC.1 ERT N0 84o- SHALE: gray, silty, soft, with 7-7/8" Tricone rock bit. gray siltstone, slightly micaceous, and silty, glauconitic sandstone containing glossy, medium sand 860- grains. as above plus a few chips of hard, light gray, very calcareous • siltstone. 880 as above with interbeds of medium- grained, gray, glauconitic, tight, dirty sandstone, trace of fine- _ grained, very pyritic sandstone. Shale and siltstone as above with • interbeds of fine-grained to very fine-grained, salt and pepper, slightly porous sandstone. 920- as above with probable 5 foot bed of fine-grained, hard, tight, salt — and pepper sandstone. 940- SHALE: silty, moderately soft, dark gray, with interbeds of sandstone; fine-grained, sub- s angular, dirty, poorly cemented in part, glauconitic, medium gray with green specks. 965: as above with sandstone; fine- = grained, angular, hard, tight, calcareous, salt and pepper. perforated. • as above but becoming very pyritic. 986_ as above with increase in Sandstone; fine-grained, subangular, dirty, poorly cemented in part, medium gray - less pyrite than above sample. INTERLAMINATED SHALE AND SANDSTONE: 1000- Sandstone; fine-grained, subangular to subrounded, pyritic, glauconitic, • generally poorly cemented and dirty but slightly porous in some parts, light to medium gray. Shale; silty, moderately soft, micaceous in part, 1020- dark gray. • FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PROJECT 4220 • HOLE NUNSER 210 941.2:9 PORTER i O'BRIEN CONSULTING ENOINEERI 3.MOLE NO.14S SNOwN ON DRAWING TITLE B FILE N0.) !NE[T7 F. E. Warren AFB SITE NO. 210 or_I Y. Sox �� W CLASSIFICATION OF SAL! CORE OR DEPTH y GM (DESCRIPTION) RECOV- IAN/LE (WAT[R l0l/�ORILLINO.ETC.) IRV N0. 1020— INTER M4IHATED SANDSTONE AND SHALE: - - Sandstone; fine-grained, subangular _ to subrounded, highly pyritic, - poorly to well cemented, in general 1040= dirty and tight, porous in part, salt and pepper. Shale; very silty, _ moderately soft, dark gray. _ Trace of hard, gray siltstone. perforated. 1060- as above with large g pyrite crystals • in sandstone matrix. - SHALE: soft, gray, slightly mica- - ceous with interbeds of laminated 1080- gray siltstone, prominent pyrite content, some chips of hard fine- - . grained sandstone. - — j SANDSTONE: very fine to fine- grai►ed, gray, salt and pepper, u80- soft, slightly porous; interbedded with gray siltstone and hard calcar- eous sandstone, moderately pyritic. —- ' SILISIUNE: very fine to fine- - grained sandstone as above, mostly 1120- hard and tight; interbedded with - gray shale. Set 1,189.5' of 6-5/8" __ casing with 104 sacks cement. _, Cement circulated to - surface. 1140-4 i dirty, shale content as above but sandstone very tight, . - — increased, I sandstone content less. Bail Test: _, f Fluid level at start - - - 83' . 1160-i Bailing time - 7 hours. as above - sandstone very dirty, Rate - 12.5 gpm. • - tight, increase in pyrite. Water level at finish - 511' . 1186: SHALE: soft, muddy, gray; gray siltstone and minor content of tight, dirty, pyritic sandstone. \ - Total Depth - 1,188' FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PROJECT 4220 HOLE NUMBER 210 • 941259 F48 .. 08 84 "C0085 c 44 4 T T T 1e + SA,g�E Co �� 11/y010114 SPECIFICATIONS FOR REPAIR SEWAGE SYSTEMS AT MISSILE ALERT FACILITIES (C & N) PROJECT NO: GHLN 93-6138 thru 6139 PREPARED BY 90 CES/CEL MISSILE ENGINEERING F.E. WARREN AIR FORCE BASE caL,41(- Jr -t t«. .e U C iA.c-l-! ?-)y--- CHIEF MISSILE ENGINEER BASE CONTRACTING OFFICER ° PRET JUNI Construction Package, Repair Sewage System at MAFs N-01 & C-01 , Specifications and • Drawings MARK A. FRANK, ENG• ATTACHMENT VII 941259 TABLE OF CONTENTS PROS. ;T NUMBER: GHLN 93 - 6138 RU 6139 DIVISION 1 - GENERAL REQUIREMENTS SECTION 01011 - SUMMARY OF PROJECT PAGE Part 1 - General 1 1 . 1 Section Includes 1 1 . 2 Related Administrative and Procedural Sections 1 1 . 3 Project Description 1 1 . 4 Administrative and Procedural Sections Applicable to All 5 1 . 5 Government Responsibilities in These Specifications 5 1 . 6 Contractor' s Use of Premises 6 1 . 7 Work Sequence 7 1 . 8 Owner Occupancy 7 Part 2 - Products 8 Part 3 - Execution 8 . SECTION 01041 - PROJECT COORDINATION Part 1 - General 1 . 1 Section Includes 9 1 . 2 Related Sections 9 1 . 3 Commencement, Prosecution and Completion of Work 10 1 . 4 Project Coordinator 10 1 . 5 Government Work in This Section 10 1 . 6 Completion Schedule 10 1 . 7 Notification of Impending Construction 10 1 . 8 Damage to Government Property 11 1 . 9 Materials List 11 1 . 10 Certificates of Compliance 11 1 . 11 Physical Data 11 1 . 12 Excavation Permits 12 1 . 13 Utility Services 13 1 . 14 Special Safety Requirements 13 1 . 15 Security Requirements 18 1 . 16 Cleanup 20 1 . 17 Scheduling Work in Advance 20 1 . 18 Contractor Equipment 20 1 . 19 Storage Facilities 20 1 . 20 Written Guarantees and Local Representative 21 i 9412 9 TABLE OF CONTENTS PROJECT NUMBER: GHLN 93 -6138 THRU 6139 PART 2 - PRODUCTS 21 PART 3 - EXECUTION 22 3 . 1 Configuration Control 22 3 . 2 Verification 22 SECTION 01050 - FIELD ENGINEERING PART 1 - GENERAL 23 1 . 1 Section Includes 23 1 . 2 Related Sections 23 1 . 3 Quality Assurance 23 1 . 4 Contract Drawings and Specifications 23 1 . 5 Government Work in This Section 25 1 . 6 Layout of Work 25 1 . 7 Meter Calibration 25 PART 2 - PRODUCTS 26 PART 3 - EXECUTION 26 SECTION 01090 - REFERENCE STANDARDS PART 1 - GENERAL 27 1 . 1 Section Includes 27 1 . 2 Related Sections 27 1 . 3 Quality Assurance 27 1 . 4 Applicable Publications 27 1 . 5 Government Work in This Section 34 PART 2 - PRODUCTS 34 PART 3 - EXECUTION 34 SECTION 01300 - SUBMITTALS PART 1 - GENERAL 35 1 . 1 Section Includes 35 1 . 2 Related Sections 35 1 . 3 Submittals 35 ii 912 ?9 TABLE OF CONTENTS PROJ] ' NUMBER: GHLN 93 -6138 1 .0 6139 1 . 4 Government Work in This Section 40 PART 2 - PRODUCTS 40 2 . 1 Recommendation of the Manufacturer 40 PART 3 - EXECUTION 40 SECTION 01400 - QUALITY CONTROL PART 1 - GENERAL 41 1 . 1 Section Includes 41 1 . 2 Related Sections 41 1 . 3 Contractor Quality Control 41 1 . 4 Government Work in This Section 43 1 . 5 Workmanship 43 PART 2 - PRODUCTS 43 Part 3 - EXECUTION 44 SECTION 01410 - TESTING LABORATORY SERVICES PART 1 - GENERAL 45 1 . 1 Section Includes 45 1 . 2 Related Sections 45 1 . 3 Testing Laboratory Services 45 1 . 4 Government Work in This Section 46 1 . 5 References 46 1 . 6 Quality Assurance 46 1 . 7 Laboratory Responsibilities 46 1 . 8 Testing Required 47 1 . 9 Testing Reports 48 PART 2 - PRODUCTS 48 PART 3 - EXECUTION 48 SECTION 01540 - SECURITY PART 1 - GENERAL 49 1 . 1 Section Includes 49 iii 9112'59 TABLE OF CONTENTS PROJECT NUMBER: GHLN 93 -6138 THRU 6139 1 . 2 Related Sections 49 1 . 3 Security Requirements 49 1 . 4 Government Work in This Section 51 PART 2 - PRODUCTS 52 PART 3 - EXECUTION 52 DIVISION 2 - SITEWORK SECTION 02110 - SITE CLEARING PART 1 - GENERAL 53 1 . 1 Section Includes 53 1 . 2 Related Sections 53 1 . 3 General 53 1 . 4 Government Work in This Section 54 PART 2 - PRODUCTS 54 PART 3 - EXECUTION 54 3 . 1 Demolition 54 3 . 2 General Excavation 54 3 . 3 Temporary Fence 55 3 . 4 Removal of Existing Sewage Liquid and Sludge 56 3 . 5 Clearing and Grubbing 57 3 . 6 Existing Underground Structures and Equipment 58 3 . 7 Disposal 58 SECTION 02205 - SOIL MATERIALS PART 1 - GENERAL 59 1 . 1 Section Includes 59 1 . 2 Related Sections 59 1 . 3 References 59 1 . 4 Government Work in This Section 59 1 . 5 Submittals 59 PART 2 - PRODUCTS 61 2 . 1 Utilization of Excavated Materials 61 2 . 2 Selection of Borrow 61 iv 941259 TABLE OF CONTENTS PROJECT NUMBER: GRIN 93 -6138 THRU 6139 PART 3 - EXECUTION 62 3 . 1 Opening and Drainage of Borrow Pits 62 3 . 2 Stockpiling 62 3 . 3 Stockpile Cleanup 62 SECTION 02207 - AGGREGATE MATERIALS PART 1 - GENERAL 63 1 . 1 Section Includes 63 1 . 2 Related Sections 63 1 . 3 References 63 1 . 4 Government Work in This Section 63 1 . 5 Submittals 63 PART 2 - PRODUCTS 64 2 . 1 Coarse Aggregate Materials 65 2 . 2 Fine Aggregate Materials 65 2 . 3 Source Quality Control 65 - PART 3 - EXECUTION 65 3 . 1 Stockpiling 65 3 . 2 Stockpile Cleanup 66 SECTION 02211 - ROUGH GRADING PART 1 - GENERAL 67 1 . 1 Section Includes 67 1 . 2 Related Sections 67 1 . 3 References 67 1 . 4 Government Work in This Section 67 1 . 5 Quality Assurance 68 PART 2 - PRODUCTS 68 2 . 1 Materials 68 PART 3 - EXECUTION 68 3 . 1 Examination 68 v 9112'59 TABLE OF CONTENTS - PROJL..2 NUMBER: GRIN 93 -6138 TT.-.C 6139 3 . 2 Preparation 68 3 . 3 Subsoil Excavation 68 3 . 4 Filling 68 3 .5 Tolerances 69 3 . 6 Field Quality Control 69 3 . 7 Schedules 69 SECTION 02223 - BACKFILLING PART 1 - GENERAL 71 1 . 1 Section Includes 71 1 . 2 Related Sections 71 1 . 3 References 71 1 . 4 Government Work in This Section 72 1 . 5 Quality Assurance 72 PART 2 - PRODUCTS 72 2 . 1 Materials 72 PART 3 - EXECUTION 72 3 . 1 Preparation 72 3 . 2 Backfilling 73 3 . 3 Tolerances 74 3 . 4 Field Quality Control 74 3 . 5 Schedules 74 SECTION 02225 - TRENCHING PART 1 - GENERAL 76 1 . 1 Section Includes 76 1 .2 Related Sections 76 1 . 3 References 76 1 . 4 Government Work in This Section 77 1 . 5 Quality Assurance 77 1 . 6 Field Measurements 77 1 . 7 Coordination 77 PART 2 - PRODUCTS 77 2 . 1 Fill Materials 77 vi 9117;9 TABLE OF CONTENTS PROJ.. P NUMBER: GHLN 93 - 6138 LU 6139 PART 3 - EXECUTION 77 3 . 1 Preparation 77 3 . 2 Excavating 78 3 . 3 Backfilling 78 3 . 4 Tolerances 79 3 . 5 Field Quality Control 79 3 . 6 Protection of Finished Work 79 3 . 7 Schedules 79 SECTION 02732 - SITE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM PART 1 - GENERAL 80 1 . 1 Section Includes 80 1 . 2 Related Sections 80 1 . 3 References 80 1 . 4 Government Work in This Section 80 1 . 5 Submittals for Review 81 1 . 6 Products Furnished but not Installed This Section 81 1 . 7 Quality Assurance 81 1 . 8 Project Record Documents 81 1 . 9 Regulatory Requirements 81 1 . 10 Field Measurements 81 1 . 11 Coordination 81 PART 2 - PRODUCTS 82 2 . 1 Sewer and Transfer Pipe Materials 82 2 . 2 Pipe Accessories 82 2 . 3 Cleanouts 83 2 . 4 Bedding Materials 84 PART 3 - EXECUTION 84 3 . 1 Examination 84 3 . 2 Preparation 84 3 . 3 Bedding 84 3 . 4 Installation - Pipe 84 3 . 5 Installation - Cleanouts 85 3 . 6 Field Quality Control 85 3 . 7 Protection 86 vii 941259 TABLE OF CONTENTS PROJECT NUMBER: GHLN 93 -6138 THRU 6139 SECTION 02745 - SEPTIC TANK SYSTEM PART 1 - GENERAL 87 1 . 1 Section Includes 87 1 . 2 Related Sections 87 1 . 3 References 87 1 . 4 Government Work in This Section 87 1 . 5 Submittals for Review 88 1 . 6 Quality Assurance 88 1 . 7 Project Record Documents 88 1 . 8 Regulatory Requirements 88 1 . 9 Coordination 88 PART 2 - PRODUCTS 88 2 . 1 Settling Tank and Distribution Box 88 2 .2 Connecting Pipe Materials 89 2 . 3 Septic Land Application Field Materials 90 PART 3 - EXECUTION 91 3 . 1 Examination 91 3 . 2 Preparation 91 3 . 3 Tank and Tank Bedding 92 3 . 4 Connecting Piping 92 3 . 5 Installation - Filter Field 92 3 . 6 Field Quality Control 93 3 . 7 Protection 93 SECTION 02830 - FARM FENCES AND GATES PART 1 - GENERAL 94 1 . 1 Section Includes 94 1 . 2 Related Sections 94 1 . 3 References 94 1 . 4 Government Work in This Section 94 1 . 5 Submittals for Review 95 1 . 6 System Description 95 1 . 7 Quality Assurance 95 1 . 8 Qualifications 96 viii 911,12"39 TABLE. OF CONTENTS PROJi"T NUMBER: GHLN 93 . 6138 ".-RU 6139 PART 2 - PRODUCTS 96 2 . 1 Materials and Components 96 2 . 2 Materials 96 2 . 3 Components 97 2 . 4 Finishes 97 PART 3 - EXECUTION 98 3 . 1 Installation 98 3 . 2 Coordination 100 SECTION 02831 - CHAIN LINK GATES PART 1 - GENERAL 101 1 . 1 Section Includes 101 1 . 2 Related Sections 101 1 . 3 References 101 1 . 4 Government Work in This Section 102 1 . 5 System Description 102 1 . 6 Submittals for Review 103 1 . 7 Quality Assurance 103 1 . 8 Qualifications 103 PART 2 - PRODUCTS 103 2 . 1 Materials 103 2 . 2 Components 104 2 . 3 Accessories 104 2 . 4 Finishes 104 PART 3 - EXECUTION 104 3 . 1 Installation 104 3 . 2 Erection Tolerances 105 3 . 3 Schedules 105 SECTION 02923 - LANDSCAPE GRADING PART 1 - GENERAL 106 1 . 1 Section Includes 106 1 . 2 Related Sections 106 ix 9412'59 TABLE OF CONTENTS PROJECT NUMBER: GHLN 93 -6138 THRU 6139 1 . 3 References 106 1 .4 Government Work in This Section 106 1 .5 Quality Assurance 106 PART 2 - PRODUCTS 107 2 . 1 Materials 107 PART 3 - EXECUTION 107 3 . 1 Examination 107 3 .2 Substrate Preparation 107 3 . 3 Placing Topsoil 107 3 .4 Tolerances 108 3 . 5 Tolerances 108 SECTION 02936 - SEEDING PART 1 - GENERAL 109 1 . 1 Section Includes 109 1 . 2 Related Sections 109 1 . 3 References 109 1 . 4 Government Work in This Section 110 1 . 5 Submittals for Review 110 1 . 6 Definitions 110 1 .7 Quality Assurance 110 1 . 8 Regulatory Requirements 110 1 . 9 Delivery, Storage, and Handling 110 1 . 10 Coordination 110 PART 2 - PRODUCTS 111 2 . 1 Seed Mixture 111 2 . 2 Soil Materials 111 2 . 3 Accessories 111 2 .4 Tests 112 PART 3 - EXECUTION 112 3 . 1 Examination 112 3 . 2 Preparation of Topsoil 112 3 . 3 Fertilizing 112 3 . 4 Seeding 113 3 . 5 Mulching 113 x 941259 TABLE OF OCNTEN '5 PROJECT NUMBER: GHLN 93 -6138 THRU 6139 3 . 6 Watering 114 3 . 7 Hydroseeding 114 3 . 8 Seed Protection 114 ATTACHMENTS Attachment 1 - Safety Hazard Analysis 116 Attachment 2 - List of Local Landowners 117 Attachment 3 - Salvaged Items 118 xi 94112'39 PROJECT NO: GHLN 93-6138 thru 6139 DIVISION 1 - GENERAL REQUIREMENTS SECTION 01011 SUMMARY OF PROJECT PART 1 GENERAL 1 . 1 SECTION INCLUDES A. Work Covered by these Contract Documents B. Administrative. and Procedural Sections applicable to all C . Government Responsibilities in this Specification D. Contractor' s Use of the Premises E . Work Sequence F . Owner Occupancy 1 . 2 RELATED ADMINISTRATIVE AND PROCEDURAL SECTIONS ( applicable to all ) : A. Section 01041 - Project Coordination B. Section 01050 - Field Engineering C . Section 01090 - Reference Standards D. Section 01300 - Submittals E . Section 01400 - Quality Control F . Section 01410 - Testing Laboratory Services G. Section 01540 - Security 1 . 3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION - Work Covered by These Contract Documents A. This specification is for F . E . Warren Air Force Base ( AFB) , Wyoming. The Contractor shall be responsible for completely renovating the sewage systems at the specified sites . All work shall be accomplished in accordance with the drawings , specifications , provisions and terms of this contract . If any conflict arises between the drawings and the specifications , the specifications shall govern . B . PROJECT NARRATIVE : This project is to renovate the various sewage disposal systems at the two Missile Alert Facilities (MAFs ) . Replacement systems and installation will comply with applicable county, state, and federal standards and DIVISION 1 -SECTION 01011 1 codes . System uniformity between same water standard class sites is a goal . The two project sites include only Class II sites . Class II sites, C-01 and N-01, have an on site reverse osmosis (RO) water treatment unit and due to limited area will have a septic system with chambered land application leach field. Site C-01 shall have an 8000 liter septic tank system and 10000000 millimeter of chambered arch leach field. Site N-01 shall have 4000 liter septic tank system and 6000000 millimeter of chambered leach field. Incidental work at all sites includes removal and reinstallation of wire farm fencing, except C-01, and ground cover seeding. Temporary containment and disposal of site sewage is required during removal of existing systems and the construction of the new systems . C. At Missile Alert Facility (MAF) C-01 (Nebraska) : 1 . Obtain all necessary permits . 2 . Determine Government easement from existing fence lines and mark. 3 . Provide temporary sewer containment and disposal provisions , either by using existing, until cut over to new, or by a separate system. 4 . Remove existing vegetation layer and stockpile topsoil (type S-4 ) . 5 . Cut and establish leachfield area to grade, remove material (type S-3) from site . 6 . Install temporary construction barriers or fencing. 7 . Over-excavate leachfield trenches and remove material (type S-3) from site. 8 . Provide, haul , and place approved aggregate prior to installation of chambered arches . 9 . Install two new sewage septic tanks . Backfill with stockpiled material (type S-3) . DIVISION 1-SECTION 01011 2 982.'9 Hello