The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About900085.tiff A teaep5755 125 REC 220755 02/209B 1 - 8 F 1007 MARYOANN5FEUERSTEIN/CLOERK6&0RECORDER•WELD CO, 0CO RESOLUTION RE: GRANT CHANGE OF ZONE FROM A (AGRICULTURAL) TO PUD (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT) FOR C-3 (COMMERCIAL) , C-4 (HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL) , AND I-1 (INDUSTRIAL) USES AS LISTED IN THE WELD COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE - FOSTER RIDGE BUSINESS PARK WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the 24th day of January, 1990 , at 10 : 00 a.m. , for the purpose of hearing the application of Foster Ridge Business Park, c/o James Rees, General Partner, 25-66 , Ltd. , 5660 West Plymouth Drive, Littleton, Colorado 80123 , requesting a Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) for C-3 (Commercial) , C-4 (Highway Commercial) , and I-1 (Industrial) uses as listed in the Weld County Zoning Ordinance for a parcel of land located on the following described real estate, to-wit: Part of the NE$ , Section 27, Township 3 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado WHEREAS, the applicant was represented by James Rees, and WHEREAS, Section 28. 8 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance provides standards for review of such a Change of Zone, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners heard all the testimony and statements of those present, has studied the request of the applicant and the recommendations of the Weld County Planning Commission, and, having been fully informed, finds that this request shall be approved for the following reasons: 1 . The applicant has complied with all the application requirements listed in Section 28 .5 et seq. , of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 2 . The request is in conformance with Section 28 . 8 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: a. The proposed Planned Unit Development (PUD) District is located within the Urban Growth Boundary Area of the Town of Mead and the I-25 Mixed-Use Development (MUD) Area. The proposed PUD District is in compliance with the Urban Growth 900085 1256 REC F 1008 NARY oANN 5FEUERSTEIN/CLERK 6&0 0 RECORDER WELD CO, CO Page 2 RE: CHANGE OF ZONE - FOSTER RIDGE BUSINESS PARK Boundary Goals and Policies. The Town Board of Mead reviewed the request in its meeting of November 13 , 1989 , and found no conflicts with its interest. The attached Conditions of Approval make the uses associated with the proposed PUD District compatible with the uses described in the I-25 MUD section of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. b. The uses allowed in the proposed PUD District will conform with the performance standards contained in Section 35 . 3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. c. The uses permitted will be compatible with the existing and future development of the surrounding area as permitted by the existing zone district, and with the future development as projected by the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. d. The Long' s Peak Water Association will provide water service to the PUD District. e. The St. Vrain Sanitation District will provide sewer service to the PUD District. f. State Highway 66 will provide access to the proposed PUD District. Access constraints recommended by the Colorado Department of Highways will be addressed as notes on the PUD District plat and as part of the PUD plan application requirements. g. The subject site does not contain any known commercial mineral deposits. h. A portion of the proposed PUD District is located within a Flood Hazard Overlay district. The conditions of approval address this concern. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the application of Foster Ridge Business Park for a Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) for C-3 (Commercial) , C-4 (Highway Commercial) , and I-1 (Industrial) uses as listed in the Weld County Zoning Ordinance on the above referenced parcel of land be, and hereby is , granted subject to the following conditions: 1 . The following notes shall be placed on the PUD plat prior to recording: 900085 1256 REC BF 02205755 1009 MARY ANN J2/20/90 FEUERSTEINCLO 16: 08 ERK & RECORDER• 0 WELD CO, CO Page 3 RE : CHANGE OF ZONE - FOSTER RIDGE BUSINESS PARK a. Prior to site plan approval and issuance of building permits a law enforcement authority shall be formed according to State Law. The law enforcement authority to be formed shall be capable of expanding to serve other areas within the I-25 MUD area to avoid duplication of overhead and other operating costs. b. All internal streets within the PUD District shall be built to Weld County Standards. The internal PUD streets shall remain private unless other arrangements are approved by the Board of County Commissioners. c. There shall be one access from the PUD to State Highway 66 . This access shall be located within 200 feet of the west boundary of the property, which is the quarter section line. d. A road right-of-way shall be shown on the PUD plan extending to the west property line to allow for future access to property west of the PUD District. e. One additional limited access may be permitted in accordance with the requirements of the Colorado Division of Highways. f. A Flood Hazard Development Permit will be required for any new construction or the substantial improvement of existing structures in the Floodway or Floodprone Districts located on the property. g. A Site Plan Review is required in accordance with Section 35 . 4 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. h. The PUD District shall use the Saint Vrain Sanitation District for sewage disposal. i. Structures within the PUD District shall not exceed 35 feet in height unless a letter from the Longmont Rural Fire District indicated they are capable of serving a greater height. j . No structure shall be located closer than 600 feet to the highwater mark of Foster Reservoir. 900085 F1256 REC 755 90 8 00 4/005 1010 MARY oANN 5FEUERSTEIN/CLERK 6&0 RECORDER•WELD CO, CO Page 4 RE: CHANGE OF ZONE - FOSTER RIDGE BUSINESS PARK k. The developer/landowners shall be responsible for taking care of nuisance wildlife problems within the PUD district. Nuisance wildlife problems shall be handled in compliance with all appropriate federal , state, and local laws . 2 . The following items shall be included as part of the PUD plan application materials: a. Written information explaining how the proposed uses within the PUD District will be made compatible. Information explaining how the proposed uses within the PUD District will be made compatible with surrounding land uses, including -Foster Reservoir. b. Written information explaining the operation of the existing oil and gas well is compatible with the proposed uses . E. An off-site road improvements agreement proposed for State Highway 66 . The proposal shall comply with Section 28 . 9 .1 . 7 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. d. Written information describing a detailed plan for -signage on each lot within the PUD District and the free-standing identification sign for the entire District. Typical signage examples shall also be shown as an illustration in accordance with Section 28 . 10 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. e. Written information explaining how the proposed PUD District will comply with Panhandle Eastern Pipeline Companies requirements as expressed in a letter dated November 2 , 1989 . f. In accordance with Section 28 . 9 . 1 . 7 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, the Subdivision Improvements Agreement shall guarantee the installation of public sewer to the PUD plan subdivision. g with representatives of the approved Highland agreement Ditch Company addressing its concerns expressed in a letter dated November 2 , 1989 . 900085 B 1256 REC 02205755 02/20/90 16: 08 -0.D0 CO: 0g 1011 MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK & JECORDER WELD05 Page 5 CO CO BE: CHANGE OF ZONE - FOSTER RIDGE BUSINESS PARK ii. Information indicating requirements of the Longmont Fire Protection District shall be met. j . A copy of an approved agreement with representa- tives _of the Rademacher Ditch addressing its concerns expressed in a letter dated November 6, 1989. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 24th day of January, A.D. , 1990 . • cwA ATTEST: lke tJ BOA D OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WE COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County 'erk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board e R. Brantner, Chairman 3.Y:. B Crn,(474 George K nnedy, Pro- em eputy County C erk EXCUSED DATE OF SIGNING - AYE APPR ED AS TO FORM: Constance L. Harbert Jr / F JC.W. Kiby unty Attorney EXCUSED Gordon E. Lacy -- 900085 HEARING CERTIFICATION DOCKET NO. $9-61 RE: CHANGE OF ZONE FROM A (AGRICULTURAL) TO PUD (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT) FOR C-3 (COMMERCIAL), C-4 (HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL) , AND I-1 (INDUSTRIAL) USES AS _LISTED IN THE WELD COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE - FOSTER RIDGE BUSINESS PARK A public hearing was conducted on January 24, 1990, at 10:00 A.M. , with the following present: Commissioner Gene P. Brantner, Chairman Commissioner George Kennedy, Pro-Tem Commissioner Constance L. Harbert Commissioner C.W. Kirby Commissioner Gordon E. lacy - Excused Also present: Acting Clerk to the Board, Mary Reiff Assistant County Attorney, lee D. Morrison Planning Department representative, Keith Schuett Health Department representative, Judy Schmidt The following business was transacted: I hereby certify that pursuant to a notice dated December 13, 1989, and duly published December 21, 1989, in The New News, a public hearing was conducted to consider the application of Foster Ridge Business Park for a Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) for C-3 (Commercial), C-4 (Highway Commercial) , and I-1 (Industrial) uses as listed in the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. Lee Morrison, Assistant County Attorney, made this matter of record. Keith Schuett, Planning Department representative, entered the favorable recommendation of the Planning Commission into the record. Judy _Schmidt, representing the Weld County Health Department, stated that the St. Vrain Sanitation District will provide sewer services to this site. James E. Rees, General Partner in 25-66, Ltd. , came forward to represent the applicant. He stated that, due to the costs involved, Foster Ridge would like to use a septic or vault sewage system until it becomes economically feasible to hook up to the St. Vrain Sanitation District. (Tape Change #90-6) Mr. Rees also requested that the Condition concerning the height of structures be changed to allow structures of the height that the Fire District can service; that two signs be allowed if the Highway Department allows two accesses; and that the required setback of 600 feet from the highwater mark of Foster Reservoir be changed. Mr. Schuett noted that the applicant has submitted a draft copy of covenants, which are to be a part of the record, but are not to be included in Board action. Mr. Rees noted that this property was once owned by the Colorado Jockey Club. Much discussion was held concerning the changes to Conditions requested by Mr. Rees. Mr. Morrison advised the Board that the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Ordinance both require that all Planned Unit Developments within the I-15 Mixed Use Development Area have public water and public sewer systems. Mr. Morrison said the Condition concerning height of structures could be amended to allow greater height upon receipt of a letter from the Fire District indicating they are capable _of serving such height. Concerning the request for a second sign, if a second highway access is approved, Mr. Morrison suggested removing the one-sign requirement as an item of Condition #1 and adding "the free-standing sign for the entire district" to a section of Condition #2, items to be included as part of the PUD Plan application materials. No public comment was offered 900085 L Page 2 CHANGE OF ZONE - FOSTER RIDGE -BUSINESS PARK concerning this matter. Commissioner Kirby moved to -approve the request of Foster Ridge Pusiness Park far a Change of Zone, subj-ect to the Conditions contained in the Planning Commission's -recommendation, with the Conditions concerning height of the structures and the signage amended as _discussed. Commissioner Harbert seconded the motion, and At carried unanimously. This Certification _was approved on the 29th day of January, 19-90. APPROVED:I1/4727 .2,4 tN.',.c,`2 il�V�✓?.Gt��t BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: (/(( WEL UNTY, COLO DO Weld County Clerk and Recorder daft( and Clerk to the Boar d, tene -t. Brantner, Chairman BY: (77 c o yA-1[-n i t tic is Cc ) a Deputy County Cie Gaorge Ken edy, Fro-Tem EXCUSED PATE OF APPROVAL Constance L. Harbert /) C.W. Ki�iy EXCUSED Gordon E. _Lacy TAPE #-90-3 & #90-6 POCKET #89-61 PL0390 900085 ATTENDANCE RECORD PLEASE write or print legibly your name, address and the name of the applicant or Docket # for the hearing you ar-e attending. TODAY' S HEARINGS ARE AS FOLLOWS: JANUARY 24, 1990 DOCKET # 89-61 CHANGE OF ZONE FROM AGRICULTURAL -TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT - -FOSTER RIDGE BUSINESS PARK DOCKET it DOCKET # NAME ADDRESS HEARING ATTENDING fr /wire pr-c-- / `//:dm4xl. 4-)1 900085 NOT I C E Pursuant to the zoning laws of the State of Colorado and the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, a public hearing will be held in the Chambers of the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, First Floor, Greeley, Colorado, at the time specified. All persons in any manner interested in the following proposed Change of Zone are requested to attend and may be heard. Should the applicant or any interested party desire the presence of a court reporter to make a record of the proceedings, in addition to the taped record which will be kept during the hearing, the Clerk to the Board's Office shall be advised in writing of such action at least five _days prior to the hearing. The cost of engaging a court reporter shall be borne by the requesting party. BE IT ALSO KNOWN that the text and maps -so certified by the Weld County Planning Commission may be examined in the office of the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners, located in the Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Third Floor, Greeley, Colorado. APPLICANT DOCKET NO. 89-61 Foster Ridge Business Park c/o James Rees, General Partner, 25-66, Ltd. 5660 West Plymouth Drive Littleton, Colorado 80123 DATE: January 24, 1990 TIME: 10:00 A.M. REQUEST: Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) for G-3 (Commercial) , C-4 (-Highway Commercial) , and I-1 (Industrial) uses as listed in the Weld County Zoning Ordinance LEGAL DESOKIPTION: Part of the NE} of Section 27, Township 3 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: West of and -adjacent to I-25 and south of and adjacent to Colorado Highway 66 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO BY: MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER AND CLERK TO THE BOARD BY: Shelly Miller, IDeputy DATED: December 13, 1989 PUBLISHED: December 21, 1989, in She New News COX ti 6 900085 STATE OF COLORADO ) :::i . COUNTY OF WELD ) _. ._ David D. Reynolds, being duly sworn , says that he is publisher of the New News, a weekly newspaper- published in Keenesburg in said County and State that said newspaper has a general circulation in said County and has been continuously and uninterruptedly published therein, during a period of at least fifty—two consecutive weeks prior to the first publication of the anne> ed P„rsaant N�OI1c i,aws � the State of CaBorad notice; that said newspaper i s a ar,d weld county 2o �n4 Ordinance. a public hearin�k wtTi newspaper within the meaning of the be held in the Chambers of act of the General Assembly of the weld Board°county, i, weld CountState of Colorado, entitled "An Act Centennial Center, i Colorado, at the time specified. to regulate the printing of legal Alias m .afY mam�ar fntereated in the following notices and advertisements, " and proposedrequested Yare re amendments thereto; that the notice heal a tor any of which the annexed is a printed presence of reporter copy taken from said newspaper, was make recordoftheprocee gscor ' in ad� to the taped, record published .n said newspaper, and in which will be kept during the the G7erk Zo the Board's t h e regular and entire issue of ice shall be advised in wrttln6 of such action at least five day every number thereof ., once a,Le 1 f prior 8the hearing. The c s be .. week for ._ / . weeks„ that said borne by req_pa . BE IT ALSO aKoNcO�u that the notice was so published in said weea ua�iy° >a lc „n�„he newspaper proper and not in any may be examined in the office of c thereof , the Clerk to the iodated of month; supplement the eof , and that the w County �„ said 91 Colorado. Third Floor, fi.r�_t. publication of notice as aforesaid, w a.r on the Mgt APPLICANT. 8981 Faster Ridge Business Park, do James Rees // day o i' General Partner, YS88, Ltd. 5884 .. __ .�,d�?_ ..___._._..__, .� g , t of nth Drive, ut�letan, and the last on the DATE: 'January ,1890 ( tEst Change of�7.aene�framD ,� d a-,l # ......_ e •... !.'' C 3 ( annirctal G4( ( nHighPwa ///}}} Commercial) sad Idyind� I ( ....ere. Bated In the eld rd,d, DESCRIPTION: Part off the NE1/4 Section Township 8th _.............................._Y_. .... .........._._._ _. a 8 West eld(`,aunt Coloreds o LOCATION:. yWest of and Subscribeda F ad acent to 1.75 and south of and and sworn o before adjacent is Colaado}�OFhway9 88 Q �COMMLSSIONERS WELSOLORADO me this 4215 day of December, 1989.+ , BY MARY ANNFCOUNTY'EUEASTEIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER ANDS BOARD BY:Shelly Miller Deputy DATED: December 13,1+•,! PUBLJSHED: December 21, 1989, in The New News ICI .ary Public My commission expire --1.s."-9C1 900085 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICA'1ION State of Colorado County of Boulder „ NOTICE PursueP9'ttao the zoning laws of the State of Colo- rado-and Re Weld County Zoning Ordinance,a I, Dean G. Lehman ,do public Being will be held in the Chambers of the Board of'County Commissioners of Weld County, Color Weld County Centennial Center, 915 solemnly swear that the LONGMONT DAILY TIMES CALL is a 10th First Floor,Greeley,Caloraso,at the inter- dailynewspaper in whole or inpart, and time fod.11owing All parsons'in any amnge or printed, published in eater MB following and may Change d.Zone are requested b attend and may be heard. the City of Longmont, County of Boulder, State of Colorado, and Should Me applicant or any interested party de- sire the sence ofd court reporter to make a which has general circulation therein and in parts ofBoulder and record ifrllSe proceedings,in addition to the taped record whl h will be kept4uring the hearing,the Weld Counties; that said newspaper has been continuously and Clerk Board's Office shall be advised in writing, such action at least five days prior to uninterruptedly published for a period of more than six months the heating.The cost of engaging a court report- er ahawglkborne by the requesting party next prior to the first-publication_of the annexed legal notice of BE IT 4440 KNOWN that the text and maps so certifietw the Weld County Planning Commis- advertisement, that said newspaper has been admitted to the sionmay:6e examined i the office of the Clerk to the B ,,of County Commissioners,located in United_States mails as second-class matter under the provisions the 890 zCounty Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, AIrd Floor,Greeley,Colorado. of the Act-of March 3, 1879, or any amendments thereof,-and that DOCKET SO.09-61 APRLIC-ANT said newspaper is a daily newspaper duly qualified for Foster-Ridge Business Park d o James Rees,lranereIPartner, publishing legal notices and advertisements within the meaning 25-66•Ltd. of the laws of the State of Colorado; that a copy 5660 weer Colorado l Drive2 of each number of Littleton, em23 DATE:,140uary 24,1990 said newspaper, in which said notice of advertisement was TIME:'0p10A.M. REQUE[N Change of Zone from A (Agricuitu- published, was transmitted by mail or carrier to each of the ral)10'PUD (Planned Unit Development) for 0-3iCommerclall,C-4(Highway Corn- subscribers of said newspaper, according to the accustomed mound I-i (Industrial) uses as listed Irlf Id County Zoning Ordinance mode of business in this office. LEGAL ownshiTION rth,R f the NEW of Sec- tion P.M., 3 North,Range 68 West of the 6th P.M.,Weld County,_Colorado ado That the annexed legal notice or advertisement waspublished LOC West ofand adjacent to Ida end 9 souM-�aTand adjacent to Colorado Highway COUNTISSIONERS in the regular and entire edition of said daily newspaper once; BOARD O WELD COUNOTV,-COLORADO BY;MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN and that one publication of said notice was in the issue of said t+ °4Nniao1 CLERK AND TO T E sRDno BY Shelly Miller,Deputy newspaper dated January 21 , 19 90 . DATEptyLenmber 13.1089 Published in the Dally Times-Call, Longmont, Colo.,January 21,1990. V - General Manager Subscribed and sworn to before me this 21st day of Januarypp ,19 90 'C-\ 24 rt rite V. \-kCitTh YY(\OMJ� Notary Public FEE$ 26.50 k!°cgMnl'gSnp vxgHFS 900085 DATE : December 13 , 1989 TO: The Board of County Commissioners Weld County, Colorado FROM: Clerk to the Board Office Commissioners : If you have no objections, we have tentatively set the following hearings for the 24th day of January, 1990 , at 10 : 00 A.M. Docket No. 89-60 - Change of Zone from C-3 (Commercial) and R-1 (Low Density Residential ) to I-2 (Industrial) - Robert E . and Lanora Comer Docket No. 89-61 - Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) fcr C-3 (Commercial) , C-4 (Highway Commercial) , and I-1 (Industrial) uses as listed in the Weld County Zoning Ordinance - Foster Ridge Business Park OFFICE OF THE CLER O THE BOARD BY : �.lett "-r 2 Deputy The above mentioned hearing date and hearing time may be scheduled on the agenda as stated above . BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO 7�rGL- Fxhibtf u 9(.4)O8S Summary of the Weld County Planning County Planning Commission December 5, 1989 Page 9 The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Planning Commission. The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the -members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Ann Garrison - yes; Jerry Burnett - yes; Judy Yamaguchi - yes; Bud Clemons - yes; Jerry Kiefer - no; Ernie Ross - yes. Motion carried with five voting bor the motion and one voting against the motion. MOTION: Jerry Burnett moved Case Number USA-898 for Longmont Foods for a Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review Permit for a Turkey Brooding Facility (150,000 turkeys) in the Agricultural zone district be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with the Planning Commission's recommendation for approval based upon the recommendation, and conditions, presented by the Department of Planning Services' staff, the Development Standards prepared by the staff and amended by the Planning Commission, and the testimony heard by Planning Commission. Motion seconded by Jerry Kiefer. The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Planning Commission. The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Ann Garrison - no; Jerry Burnett - yes; Judy Yamaguchi - no; Bud Clemons - abstain; Jerry Kiefer - no; Erni-e Ross - yes. Motion carried was denied with two voting for the motion, three voting against the motion and one abstaining. The Chairman declared a break at 6:25 p.m. The meeting was reconvened at 6:30 p.m. NOTICE: 6:30 p.m. Judy Yamaguchi has left the meeting. 'g CASE NUMBER: Z-452 A1 APPLICANT: Foster Ridge Business Park, 25-66, Ltd. , c/o James Rees REQUEST: A Change of Zone for A-1 (Agriculture) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) for C-3 (Commercial) , C-4 (Highway Commercial) , and I-1 (Industrial) zone 'districts LEGAL DESCRIPTION: NEI of Section 27, T3N, R68W of the $th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: West of and adjacent to I-25 and south of And adjacent to State Highway 66 Exhi �i -/- C 900085 Summary -of the Weld County Planning County Planning Commission December 3, 1989 Page 10 APPEARANCE: Jim Rees, General Partner, represented the applicant. -They are requesting 113 -acres of nonproductive agricultural land be rezoned to allow an industrial and _commercial -Planned Unit Development. They have reviewed the recommendation and conditions of the Department of Planning Services staff. They will meet with the Sheriff to discuss his recommendation of a law enforcement authority. Conditions #2, regarding curbs and gutters; they would like the flexibility to install these at the time of improvement. Also, they can't afford to install the required sewer from the St. Vrain Sanitation District. The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the audience. There was none. The Chairman asked Keith Schuett to read the recommendation and condition prepared by the -Department o₹ Planning Services staff into the record. Tape 364 - Side 2 _MOTION; Jerry Kiefer moved Case Number Z-452 for Poster Ridge Business Park, 25-66, Ltd. , for a Change of -Zone from Agricultural to Planned Unit Development for Commercial, Highway Commercial, and Industrial zone districts be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with the Planning Commission's _recommendation for approval based upon the recommendation of the Department of Planning Services staff and the testimony heard by the Planning Commission. Motion seconded by Ann Garrison. ''he Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Planning Commission. Discussion followed. 'The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Ann Garrison - yes; Jerry Burnett - yes; Bud Clemons - yes; Jerry Kiefer - yes; Ernie Ross - no. Motion carried with four voting for the motion and one voting against the motion. CASE NUMBER: USR-896 APPLICANT: _Gary and Mary Ann Tuten 'REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review Permit for a vehicle sales and salvage operation in the I-3 (Industrial) zone district -LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the Ni NW} of Section 20, T1N, R66W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, -Colorado LOCATION: South of Weld County Road 8 and east of and adjacent to Weld County -Road 27 (Old Highway 85) 900085 BEFORE THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY. COMMISSIONERS Moved by Jerry Kiefer that the following resolution be introduced for passage by the Weld County Planning Commission. Be it Resovled by the Weld County Planning Commission that the application for: CASE NUMBER: Z-452 NAME: Foster Ridge Business Park, c/o James Rees, General Partner, 25-66, Ltd. ADDRESS: 5660 West Plymouth Drive, Littleton, CO 80123 REQUEST: Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) for C-3 (Commercial) , C-4 (Highway Commercial) , -and I-1 (Industrial) uses as listed in the Weld County Zoning Ordinance LEGAL DESCRIPTION: part of the NEI of Section 27, T3N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld -County, Color-ado LOCATION: West of and adjacent to I-25 and south of and adjacent to Colorado Highway 66 be recommended favorably to the Board of _County Commissioner-s for the following 1. The submitted materials are substantially in compliance with the application requirements of Section 28.5 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 2-. The rezoning request is in conformance with Section 28.7 of the Weld County -Zoning Ordinance as follows: - The proposed Planned Unit Development (-PUD) District is located within the urban growth boundary area of the Sown of Mead and the I-25 Mixed-Use Development (-MUD) area. The proposed PUD -district is in compliance with the urban growth boundary goals and policies. The -Town Board of Mead reviewed the request in its meeting of November 13, 1989, and found no conflicts with its interest. The attached conditions of approval make the uses associated with the proposed PUD district compatible -with the uses described in the I-25 MUD section of the Weld -County Comprehensive Plan. - The uses allowed in the proposed -PUD district will conform with the performance standards contained in Section 35.3 of the Weld _County Zoning Ordinance; 900085 E.xL hc+- . Z-452 Foster Ridge Business Park Page 2 - The uses permitted will be compatible with the existing and future development of the surrounding area as permitted by the existing zone district, and with the future development as proj-ected by the Weld County Comprehensive Plan; - The Long's Peak Water Association will provide water service to the PUD district; - The St. Vrain Sanitation 7)istrict will provide sewer service to the PUD district; - State Highway 66 will provide access to the proposed PUD district. Access constraints recommended by the Colorado Department of Highways -will be addressed as notes on the PUD district _plat and as part of the PUD plan application requirements; ▪ The subject site does not contain any known commercial mineral deposits; and - A portion of the proposed PUD district is located -within a flood hazard overlay _district. The _conditions of approval address this concern; The Planning Commission's recommendation for approval is conditional upon the -following: 1. The -following notes being placod on the -PUD plat prior to recording: - Prior to site -plan approval and issuance of building -permits a law enforcement authority _shall be formed according to State Law. The law enforcement authority to be formed _shall be capable of -expanding to serve other areas within the I-25 MUD area to -avoid duplication of overhead and other operating costs; - All internal _streets within the PUD district shall be built to Weld County Standards. The internal PIJD streets shall remain private unless other arrangements are -approved by the Board of County Commissioners; - There shall be one access from the PUD to State Highway 66. This access shall be located within 200 feet of the west boundary of the property, which is the quarter section line; 900085 Z-452 Foster Ridge Business Park Page 3 - A road right-of-way shall be shown on the PUD plan extending to the west property line to allow for future access to property west of the PUD district; - One additional limited access may be permitted in accordance with the requirements of the Colorado Division of Highways; - A Flood Hazard Development Permit will be required for any new construction or the substantial improvement of existing structures in she Floodway or Floodprone tistricts located on the property; - A Site Plan Review is required in accordance with Section 35.4 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance; - The PUD district shall use the Saint Vrain Sanitation District for sewage disposal; - Structures within the PUD district shall not exceed 35 feet in height; - The PUD district is permitted one free-standing identification sign. The sign shall not exceed 45 feet in height and 150 square feet per face. The minimum setback shall be 15 feet and the minimum offset shall be 10 feet; - No structure shall be located closer than 600 feet to the highwater mark of Foster Reservoir; - The developer/landowners shall be responsible for taking care of nuisance wildlife problems -within the PUD district. Nuisance wildlife problems shall be handled in compliance with all appropriate federal, state, -and local laws; 2. The following items shall be included -as part of the -PUD plan application materials: - Written information explaining how the proposed uses within the PUD district will be made compatible. Information explaining _tow the proposed uses -within the PUD district will be made compatible with surrounding land uses, including Foster Reservoir; - Written information explaining the operation of the existing oil and gas well is compatible with the proposed uses; 9c0085 Z-452 Foster Ridge Business Park Page 4 - An off-site road improvements agreement proposed for Slate Highway 66. The proposal shall comply with Section 28.9.1.7 of the Weld County Zoning ordinance; - Written information describing a detailed plan for signage on each lot within the PUD district. Typical signage examples shall also be shown as an illustration in accordance with Section 28.10 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance; - Written information explaining how the proposed PUD district will comply with Panhandle Eastern Pipeline Companies requirements as expressed in a letter dated November 2, 1989; - In accordance with Section 28.9.1.7 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, the subdivision improvements agreement shall guarantee the installation of public sewer to the PUD plan subdivision; - A copy of an approved agreement with representatives of the Highland witch Company addressing its concerns expressed in a letter dated November 2, 1989; - Information _indicating requirements of the Longmont Fire Protection District shall be met; and - A copy of an approved agreement with representatives of the Rademacher Ditch addressing its concerns expressed in a letter dated November 6, 1989. Motion seconded by Ann _Garrison VOTE: For Passage Against Passage Ann Garrison Ernie Ross Jerry Burnett Bud Clemons Jerry Kiefer The Chairman declared the resolution passed and ordered that a certified copy be forwarded with the file of this case to the Board of County Commissioners for further proceedings. 9C0053 Z-452 Foster Ridge Business Park Page 5 CERTIFICATION OF COPY I, Bobbie Good, Recording Secretary of the Weld County Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution is a true copy of the Resolution of the Planning Commission of Weld County, Colorado, adopted on December 5, 1989, and recorded in Book No. XII of the proceedings of the Planning Commission. Dated the 8th day of December, 1989. o<1 Bobbie Bobbie Good Secretary 900085 INVENTORY OF ITEMS SUBMITTED FOR CONSIDERATION Foster Ridge Case Number Z-452 Submitted or Prepared Prior to Hearing At Hearing 1. Application 7 Pages X 2. One application plat(s) 1 page(s) X 3. DPS Referral Summary Sheet X 4. DPS Recommendation X 5. DPS Surrounding Property Owner's Mailing List X 6. DPS Mineral Owner's Mailing List X 7. Three DPS Maps Prepared by Planning Technician X 8. DPS Notice of Hearing X 9. DPS Case File Summary Sheet X 10. DPS Field Check X 11. Letter dated May 15, 1989, from Kieth A. Schuett, X to Mr. Rees on the PUD Sketch Plan 12. Memo dated November 28, 1989, from Wes Potter, X Weld County Health Department 13. Letter dated November 17, 1989, from Larry X Rogstad, Division of Wildlife 14. Letter dated November 9, 1969, from Evan A. X Hooper, Colorado Highway Department 15. Letter dated November 2, 1989, from Ann M. X Mauck, Highland Ditch Company 16. Letter dated November 2, 1989, from Larry X Abston, Panhandle Laster Pipeline Company 17. Letter dated April 17, 1989, from Terry McKee, X U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 18. Memo dated October 31, 1989, from Drew X Scheltinga, Weld County Engineering 19. Memo dated October 27, 1989, from Ed Jordan, X Weld County Sheriff's Department 20. Letter received November 6, 1989, from Louis X Rademacher 21. Letter fated November 8, 1989, from Stephen X Pott, State Oil and Gas Conservation Commission 22. Letter dated November 7, 1989, from Steve Ward, X Longmont Fire Protection District 23. Letter dated November 10, 1969, from Vernon X Peppler, President, Longs Peak Water Association 24. Letter dated November 6, 1989, from Candace L. X Jochim, Engineering Geologist, State Geological Survey ≥x h<.bL t 9( �lQ�BS C & M Companies Z-452 Page 2 25. Referral response dated October 31, 1989, Mark X D. Matlich, Colorado Water Conservation Board 26. Referral response dated October 27, 1989, from X Ed Herring, Office of Emergency Management 27. Referral response dated November 3, 1989, X Orville L. Sadar, Longmont Soil Conservation District 28. Referral response dated November 9, 1989, X Jennifer Reese, Amoco Production Company I hereby certify that the twenty-eight items identified herein were submitted to the Department of Planning Services at or prior to the scheduled Planning Commission hearing. I further certify that these items were forwarded to the Clerk to the Board's office on December 11, 1989. .7‘ Vaji-d-L•e4rd-- Current Planner STATE OF COLORADO ) COUNTY OF WELD lA G(� SUBSCRIBBD'((ND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS kk day of tac.avv tay,_ 19'n . ‘;DTARy- ,.o •• A §931,JL.)�G - C co\-o - \ NOTARY\ PUBLIC My Commission Expires My Commission Expires ;"ob. 13, 1993 900085 EXHIBIT(� INVENTORY CONTROL SHEET ease ( 'A� — 4 S an IY1�a0 L3wc " nap Pahl Exhibit Submitted By Exhibit Description 12h A. nn O G 12/x, • B 1/A M h. n a , mrin ./ln i U1ti� l �r nJ b7 C�rfl YCn o n� ��1��C )2/ e. P es-.run.cAm 6fhthlvnal ry a Ail. IZ/n n. 66A/e, 12 E. gdo4 414.2j- /A n fin , F. G. H. I. J.. K. L. M. N. 0. 900085 The applicant, on January 22, 1990, submitted proposed covenants. The staff has determined that these may be made part of the record, but are not to be approved as part of this change of zone case. The staff will be reviewing the covenants for any conflicts with existing regulations or conditions of approval. 900085 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SIGN POSTING CERTIFICATE • I HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER THE PENALTIES OF PERJURY THAT THE SIGN PROVIDED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES WAS POSTED ON THE PROPERTY AT LEAST TEN • (10) DAYS PRECEDING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER'S HEARING FOR CASE #Z </SR . THE SIGN WAS POSTED BY: 5/EA' es,AZ /`4' Brit /E5F /e�ES NAME OF ERSON POSTING SIGN —6eft-70 GNAT E OF A PLICANT STATE OF COLORADO ) COUNTY OF WELD ) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS 9 DAY OF 6e,," Ztf 19 904 a SEAL ` 727- ay-n- NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES $t4. Z' /99c LAST DAY TO POST SIGN IS: 19 11 JAN 1 1 1990 J SC0085 p Cb. 1�I H 1iN'nn :IWrvlgrlr. PLANNING COMMISSION SIGN POSTING CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER THE PENALTIES OF PERJURY THAT THE SIGN PROVIDED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES WAS POSTED ON THE PROPERTY AT LEAST TEN (10) DAYS PRECEDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING FOR CASE 1 4{j THE SIGN WAS POSTED BY: t/•f rrF5 E .a S NAME OF PERSON POSTIN SIGN IG ATU OF APP CANT STATE OF COLORADO ) COUNTY OF WELD ) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS 3th DAY OF November 19 89 . / , SEAL OTARY BLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES May 3, 1993 LAST DAY TO POST SIGN IS: 19 • N0V 8 1989 Dk field Co. Plem iw omgan,, %MM085 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Weld County Planning hheCoarinnl�aaio will ho7d_ a ej 5 st q19(89 at 1:30 p.m. for theember 5 Development n and �8 of Zane for Aprowty described pproval below. to requestma pcar�ea a a vested property to$A�PU Foster Law.Ridge Jaffa Rae r, (25-86 , d o Partner LEGAL PaCR pT1ION: Part of the NE1/4 of Section 27, TIN naaw or Nthe Colorado P.M., Weld ,PROPOSED USEE: CINTENhange of for (Planned_Unit from A (Agricultural) t) riel) CC-4Igrussm))Commercial), and I-I T1O14: West of and 1to I-25 south of and to State 68 13 acres,moo�or leas hearing will be held ield Canny n Heariinng Room First W d 'ren:n Street, GrCeneeley,y,�lora�p8. 15 or request related to • ��in wriut�leill tshculd be y�, 9 , �Cmolor 606'31 oath public bear g on Decmbar 4 1989. doom of the application are avhle for public inspection in �meealla Department of Planning Servy Cen CenterRoom , 915 TeConth Streetreele , Colorado 80631 - aij: :sa6-to00 EztensIon 4400. \ aid County Planning Commission 1 /1 -� To be publ hed be publiehed ones(Netin by !�,/i`� November 3, 1989 L] ti` '' i 1� r N ii Li i Wed Cr.) ?t':itYittait 3:1v:i-ic )COO85 r. (f 414\ DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE(303)356-4000,EXT.4400 91510th STREET GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 COLORADO NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Weld County Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, December 5, 1989, at 1 :30 p.m. for the purpose of considering a Site Specific Development Plan and a Change of Zone for the property described below. Approval of the request may create a vested property right pursuant to Colorado Law. APPLICANT: Foster Ridge Business Park, (25-66, Ltd.), c/o James Rees, General Partner LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NE} of Section 27, T3N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado TYPE AND INTENSITY OF PROPOSED USE: Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) for C-3 (Commercial) C-4 (Highway Commercial) , and I-1 (Industrial) uses LOCATION: West of and adjacent tc 1-25; south of and adjacent to State Highway 66 SIZE: 113 acres, more or less The public hearing will be held in the Weld County Commissioners' Hearing Room, First Floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado. Comments or objections related to the above request should be submitted in writing to the Weld County Department of Planning Services, 915 Tenth Street, Room 342, Greeley, Colorado 80631, before the above date or presented at the public hearing on December 5, 1989. Copies of the application are available for public inspection in the Department of Planning Services, Room 342, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado 80631 - Phone - 356-4000, Extension 4400. Ernie Ross, Chairman Weld County Planning Commission To be published in the New News To be published one (1) time by November 3, 1989 Received by: Date: 300085 MAILING LIST 2-452 Foster Ridge Business Park L & W Partnership 132 South Skyline Drive P.O. Box 1176 Mankato, MN 56001 Robert M. and Janice M. Rademacher 13774 I-25 Access Road Longmont, CO 80501 Frank E. Weingardt and Elizabeth Weingardt 14116 Weld County Road 7 Longmont, CO 80501 Mountain State T & T Company 1801 California, #3130 Denver, CO 80202 First National Bank of Longmont 401 Main Street Longmont, CO 80501 Edward A. Anderson and First National Bank of Longmont 402 Main Street Longmont, CO 80501 Donald C. Hilgers 2322 South Rogers Villa, #20 Mesa, AZ 85202 Kitely Farms A General Partnership 13844 Weld County Road 7 Longmont, CO 80501 Valley 66, Ltd. c/o John P. Gavin 513 Lincoln Avenue Winnetka, I1 60093 Sekich Business Park 14311 Mead Street Longmont, CO 80501 900085 MAILING LIST Z-452 Foster Ridge Business Park Page 2 25-66 Ltd. 5660 West Plymouth Drive Littleton, CO 80123 St. Vrain Land Company 6999 North York Street Denver, CO 80229 Union Pacific Resources -8774 Yates Drive, Suite 100 Westminister, CO 80030 Amoco Production Company 1760 Broadway P.O. Box 800 Denver, CO 80201 900085 The following is a list of the names and addresses of all mineral owners on or under NE} Section 27, Township 3 North, Range 68 West. 1. Mineral Owners 25-66LTD 5660 W. Plymouth Dr. Littleton, CO 80123 All but coal. St. Vrain Land Co. 6999 N York St. Denver, CO 80229 All but coal. _Union Pacific Resources 8774 Yates Dr. Suite 100 Westminister, CO 80030 Coal only. 2. Lessees of Owners Amoco Production Co. 1760 Broadway P.O. Box 800 Denver, CO 80201 Oil and gas lease. 9L0085 CEITIFICATE OF MAILING I hereby certify that I have placed a true and correct copy of the surrounding property owners and owners and lessees of minerals in accordance with the notification requirements of Weld County in the case fl-452 for Foster Ridge Business Park, 25-66, Ltd. , c/o James Rees, General Partner, in the United States Mail postage prepaid First Class Mail by postal card as addressed on the attached list. This 30th day of October 1989. pc TO: SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS OR OWNERS AND LESSEES OF MINERALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH WELD COUNTY'S NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS. The Weld County Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, December 5, 1989, at 1 :30 p.m. in the County Commis- sioners' Hearing -Room, first floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado, concerning the request of: CASE NUMBER: Z-452 APPLICANT: Foster Ridge Business Park, 25-66, Ltd. , c/o James Rees, General Partner REQUEST: Change of Zone to PUD (Planned Unit _Development)evelopment) for C-3 (Commercial) , C-4 (Highway Commercial) , and I-1 (Industrial) uses LEGAL: Part of the NE} of Section 27, T3N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: West of and adjacent to I-25; south of and adjacent to State Highway 66 For more information call Keith A. Schuett, Current Planner. WELD COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES 915 10th Street - Room 342 Greeley, CO 80631 Phone 356-4000, Ext. 4400 5x-0085 Planned Unit Development Change of Zone AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS -------- SURFACE Application No. Subject Property 66 1rA �� (FOSTER RIDGE BUSINESS PARK) STATE OF COLORADO ) COUNTY OF WELD ) ss. THE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn, states that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names, addresses and the corresponding Parcel Identification Number assigned by the Weld County Assessor of the owners of property (the surface estate) within five hundred (500) feet of the property subject to the application. This list was compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor, or an ownership update from a title or abstract company or attorney, derived from such records, or from the records of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. The list compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor shall have been assembled within thirty (30) days of the application submission date. GENERAL PARTNER The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me this QQlVL� P L. �/11day 192_ by. WITNESS my hand and official seal. My Commission expires: '094990 ff 7C L inLy Notary Public !77/.0 .S-G L Mr-A-my y ›f_Lb.thy,v /.2v 3L0085 Planned Unit Development Change of Zone _NAMES QE Q1 NERg QE EBDEEB?'Y RUBIN :B0 E€ T AS OF SEPTEMBER 27, 1989 €- NAME ADDRESS,TOWN/CITY STATE AND ZIP CODE ASSESSORS PARCEL IDENTIFICATION it L & W Partnership 132 S. Skyline Dr. P. O. Box117f, 120726000004 Mankato, MN 56001 Robert M. and Janice M. 13774 1-25 Longmont Ac Rd. 12@76000029 Rademacher Frank Ed + CO 8050050 1 Weingardt & 14116 Elizabeth Weingardt WCR 7 120722000034 Longmont , CO 80501 Mountain 120722000@35 States Telephone e & Telegraph 1801 California Company Denver , CO 80202 # 130 120722000@20 Undivided 1/3 to 401 Main Street Edward A. Anderson First National Bank ATTN:Longmont 120727000024 of Lon + CO 8050! 1207270000444mont Trust Dept. Donald C. Hilgers 2322 S. Rogers #20 Villa 120722000021 First Mesa, AZ 85202 National Bank of Longmont Longmont , CO 80501 401 Main Street 120727000043 Kitely Farms, A General Partnership 13844 WCR 7 Longmont , CO 80501 120727000047 Valley 66, A Limited Partnership John P. Gavin 513 Lincoln Ave 1207230@00, 1 Winnetka, IL 60093 Sekich Business Park 14311 Mead Street Longmont , CO 80501 1207230@10@0 120723001004 hiLOO85 I i EXHIBIT "I" 900085 Planned Unit Development Change of Zone AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS MINERALS AND/OR SUBSURFACE Application No. Subject Property_ _aF Lrd aus o STATE OF COLORADO ) COUNTY OF WELD ) ss. THE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn, states that to the best of his nr her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names and addresses of all mineral owners and lesses of mineral owners on or under the parcel of land which is the subject of the application as their names appear upon the records in the Weld County Clerk and Recorder's Office, or from an ownership update from a title or abstract company or an attorney. GENERAL PARTNER The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me this /17/ day of seWbj7'2.d.L4.- , 19f9 WITNESS my hand and official seal. My Commission expires: 742 9//990 Notary Public 57/6 ,deuZL Mdoty de-6) 80/26 300085 149, 4 ((a \C\ DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE(303)356-4000,EXT.4400 91510th STREET GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 e COLORADO October 24, 1989 Foster Ridge Business Park c/o James E. Rees Y.O. Box 1764 Englewood, CO 80150-1764 Subject: Z-452 - Request for a Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) for I-3 (Industrial) and C-3 (Commercial) uses on a parcel of land described as part of the NE} -of Section 27, T3N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. Dear Mr. Rees: Your application and related materials for the request described above has been accepted at your request for porcessing. I have scheduled a meeting with the Weld County Planning Commission on Tuesday, December 5, 1989, at 1:30 p.m. This meeting will take place in the County Commissioners' Hearing Room, first floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado. It is recommended that you and/or a representative be in attendance to answer any questions the Planning Commission members might have with respect to your application. It is the policy of Weld County to refer an application of this nature to any town or municipality lying within three miles of the property_in :question or if the property under consideration is located within the _comprehensive planning area of a town or municipality. Therefore, our -office has forwarded a copy of the submitted materials to the Mead Planning Commission for its review and comments. Please call Bertina Willden at 535-4477 for further details regarding the date, time, and place of this meeting. It is recommended that you and/or a representative be in attendance at the Planning Commission Meeting to answer any questions the Commission members may have with respect to your application. SC0085 Foster Ridge Business Park c/o James E. Rees October 24, Page 2 It is the responsibility of an applicant to see that a sign is posted on the property under consideration at least 10 days preceding the hearing date. Sometime prior to November 7, 1989, you or a representative should call me to obtain -a sign to be posted -on the site no later than November 11, 1989. The Department of Planning Services' staff will make a recommendation concerning this application to the Weld County Planning Commission. It is the responsibility of the applicant to call the Department of Planning Services office a few days before the date of the Planning Commission hearing to obtain that recommendation. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to call me. Respectfully, tege/ith A.a Scuett Current Planner XAS:rjg pc Jerry McRae, P.E. 200985 REES & COMPANY P o 6c7x 1764 • ENGLEWOOD.CO 80150-1764 • (303) 762-1254 1601 N. Cu:LE<.C AVE -1F221 • For Cowes, CO 80524 •(303) 493-4943 FACSIMILE COVER LETTER ATE: 1-22-90 "0: Keith.Schuett Weld-county Planning„ Dept. UE.ECT: F(lster Ride Business Park Covenants (Rough Draft) UMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER SHEET: I1 xv NUYBER: (303) 356-4000 X 4331 • C you�do not receive all the pates, please call as soon as possible. SC0085 DECLARATION OF JAN 2 2 1990 COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, AND RES T ONS FOSTER RIDGE BUSINESS PARK laid Co. Planning Commission This declaration is made this clay of by ,25-66LTD, a Colorado Limited Partnership ther.ei naf ter <'ai 3rd 25-.66") . • WHEREAS, 25-66 is the _owner of all that certain real property .. (hereinafter. called " F..R.B.P. ") which is situated in the NE 1/4, Section . 27, : Township 7 North, Rarige 68 West, t3f the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. And more particularly described on Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by • r,efer-ee, which real property is more commonly known as a PUD named Foster Ridge BUsi mess Perk. .WHEREAS, 25-66 desires and intends to develop the F.R.B.P. as a ,Busi-tress Park, and to impose thereon mutually I beneficial • : :•restr='ictians' l-wn.der a general plan o-F improvement for the benefit of all of F.h.B.P.., the improvements thereon and the future owners thereof i�iOW4 HEREFORE', . pursuant to a General plan of improvement -for the :F'y rB.P. - 25-66 hereby declares that all of the property in the • •: F ,R_$_p. is and shall be held, conveyed, hypothecated, leased,; . rented, used, occupied' and :improved subject; .' , =`r to • he .. r.evenants=:: :conditions, r EiStr-i c_t: °ons and .- I i mi tati crass tt►e e. na#ter __.set.. forth, - . all of which 'are decl.asred ...to• be : in ;: a tithe off:na M• pl;a rfof the sub diN.ris- .i .._.or sale.:af -Batts in .the F.RUB.} andare5tab3 _> sfished for: �:,... hancin t#'ts+:r :'. :value g � - �desa�s^�+ab i 11:t :ass - r:�', • ;; '.: �'shot vesaes '0f +sai d r�opert Y: d ' � . .": •,...,....: .;-._ ".. .•'. . 'F. • ': Al bf-- - ^rte -'•.' . ' i3 - sir ar- coversarFts, coAdi ti On s+s.;•anti =-U.1mztata•ans `.ri�rt. with , z d rea' p p and ever - . k arty v'.'.{plltrt''' 't hereof :�ho1.lbind :ail.. -:.. .:,. 'partie •1-4avino or, acc .4iring•:any right 4' title tar-',:interest _in said real property or:: any: part thereof, shall be, for.' the benefit of owner of, and:,pt rtiosi of szti d' :Pr' tyr : '.o art:. interest x• a `; erc i n, :=" 'anti i'at** Il ;inure t• benr t Y t� .. the�.��, ;'� ar+t#= •.#iirrs,3 each _ Successor in interest 'of the. owners thereof. • AP,TICLE I • GENERAL PURPOSES • '254b herby declares the purposes of this Declaration to be to.:. ::insure estab 1 i shsrertt of a ,general plan for.. thiM , K ��*: de t nt rx�C._ to: t tm th :' cart r,_fi=rr -.'e sch :. _;s_ -Site against said• improper development or use of other Sites ';_: 4,0u l.d t1 ec i_,_ �R�> ate- the value crf.� .�suC•fi►' ,E3wr► r- - •- prr_edent' ..constr•'uc.t i on of buildings, or other - improvements. ='='.:" havtrig..a. design or mode of construction which. in 'lr,suitable . :•:_to or unharmoni ous with said general plan, and generally, to provide for a Business Park of high Quality. • • • • • z1OA II • DEFINITIONS As used herein "approval " shall .mean the prior' written approval of the .Architectural Committee, after • such , Committee has been furnished with all known facts necessary to render a decision. • 2.2. Assessment F. These can be levied by the feaster Association to create a maintenance fund for common area needs and streets and roads. Association Progerty.t This is property within the Boundaries of F.R.B.P. that are considered common area, open spaces: :and roads or streets which are not maintained by the County 2.4. Board shall mean the Board of Director=_ of the Master _Association.. 2.St : •BYIawsshall me:.n the Bylaws of the Master . Association wwhi��ch. .may,,.: be.::.ad©pted and amended from time to time.:'by .-the • 1. ';tutt:," anmer Site shall cr; an ;,a Conti gates area -0 :l 3`,and : : 4Km ss a =ecOfd raei^5t�t.i .:fti aseci:`from ''25—& t• `tk' `"•• •same ::ti. a wi thi n .:th.e PUD that:'•is",estr bl, shed for. grAct•-Z474 type. ' ' d�iEstr#: 1 •i to =:x, aE :�ssrttf. • ' �-vthet ��ai �•reco� -,. � .. •- .•-_ �.•„• i"e�►' i�f •I ►d:- i r� • .d owner - aced from _256&''''-at,.. the : same °tip" Rhin. •the MAD. that .i's: .establiShed• for I-I type: zones. • - 2,8; :Building .Means the pri.;nc.ipal structure .or- :sstr•uctures .. _on . any site 'i ncl'iadi nth a1 l 00/Wet. i ons or ex tens1iins nd. all garages, outside platforms, outbuildings, docks, canopies, porches, and the like. 2. 9. Imarrovements means all improvements .on: • a site i mcl udi rag; but not 1 i mi ted to' buildings, loading areas• , par'kxrrg areas, pavement';•'' Iibl•As,' fences, signs, "<` walks, • driveways., .p aths, aerial antennae, and landscaping. • - 2. 1 J. Maiatenance (Fund,- means# all• monies. .��i�#:=�• cc�Il acted by . , ;•;,, :ti . $rc:tt�e.. memo ib ! � -'t trite . ti'ca c»- ₹he-'benefit :of association owned property. • 2+11.:` Common.:.'- Areas ' 'aeeart '`those area-s within the F.3•t.H.P. ,.:that-• are. owned"by the l'#aster"-A5soci at i can 'or the benefit of the association • • t „ • I 900095 Ja .- ". -Hut . i@4• • 2_ 12. Ma=,ter- Association (here•:n fter sometimes called the -a-ssoc i at i- on) shall mean. P.R.LP..; Master Association the., non-pr~ofit Colorado Corporation. described in Article hereof and its successors. . • 2. 1'•- Plans and Seecifications shall mean all drawings, • • renderings,. etc. that applies to -',construction and layout of the i mprdvements upon a specific sf:t• • 2- 14•. Owner means any person, firm, corporation , • partnership, or any other entity .holding legal title to a site as shown by the records of Weld County, Colorado. 'orado. 2. 15. -P.R.8_P_ (Foster Ridge Business Paris; means the real property described in Exhibit A. 2w:66 means the initial owner of the real property described .in Exhibit A. • - ARTICLE I I I • - 'APPROVAL OF PLANS AND *SPECIFICATIONS • . 3_;1 y;: lArchitgctural Committee..•::.: There is hereby 3;::-ann:'=. :Arcl�•f:i::tectur�al : Committee wi cse`. `.i.ni ti al member: '5T1:I-':.lie' • . app ►i nt`ed..,b. •.1.5."••66 The .C- Yomnii.t'�ee_.shall consist - -- :.f - �:Qf:.at �:�est: '_ • = at "member-s• I t' i s intended -- _ -- - - _ _ _ tbat :xhtz':COaMritte►e' incl. - '�`�'• ,i`C 5 P 0 rt4 t-sand :.ti'h a `persta`'t�i` bur Ys rt' t�s�s �^ r: .: .. :' icpee= tincel-: '^however fail • t:rs t'�. i #x�._, s lure,` ':too. include .such - - not ,`y.i twat"date .th.e r r. . ,,.,.w.. .. I a1 sd have fa5.,-..: ttier • , ;..'. :, ate!�r3ber or �. _ P�, _ 'ifii�- D3c1�•i�:�;..'�t't'�of,:'i�ti X d• .iz:f�. .� ,i,.:':` ,• i3 '°`t :` rtchiteeturai Cott it .. j} p y .�;.: t ''-.5�1.�1 1 J Aery+. .at tt'le ..',Three members shall:::'tansti tute a q corum of ...the ' ••• Committee. • •'T'he Committee may either hold formal or .ik nformal::, ` `. • : meet( ig'e • or' may independently revi;ew -:��-`.-•�:,. ... i�V-��,,•ry'i stl�� shall. ' prapc�sal s��crd s n• :�tiai _ approve ice" .d`i^Sat3prQ' •plans • * ' s._.. • ' • indicating such on such plans. ,y ' ^' . `' .FC'i trr: : Written A•Eeroval _ • :No '. improvements shall be construed, erected, placed, altered, maintained or permitted on any building site until plans and specifications with :respect'--' thereto in manner and form satisfactory to the Arch,i ,ectur€ti .. Corrxmi ttee showi rig the proposed improvements, ,plot layout and all a>:ter i or elevations, materials and :,. colors.,. signs. and landseap.ingT.... traffic ..engineerin nu er. . ... +fib • °:z `:= E;:'..1*ut• of parkin a ace .':::::: �;,:. 9':>. � �••-=--..grtafifr�q-;-:.._Qdse�er��'�4 •..,.,-,:..::. . Oran rage. ano .ut',i i i- i es, proposeo out ioi ng use aria riumoer or h dt er .ibfrsrMetion as: snag:°be• requested b: `• _ -~�r�.:;:.: • . ::::Committee have been submitted to and •approved . in.:-:•:':. tins" by •tt,e Architectural Commi ttee..• Such pl ans • . speifications shall be submitted ie writing over }tae:::; • si_gnatur-e of the owner of the buildir!q site or the owner 's - authorized agent • 900085 • Z.;3. Approval . Approval shall be based, among other . things on adequacy of building site di mensions r ' conformity and harmony of external design with neighboring structures, , effect of location and use of improvements on neighboring building sites, operations and uses; relation of topography, grade and finished ground elevation o+ the building site bed no improved to that of neighboring building sites; proper facing of main elevation with respect to nearby street; and conformity of the plans and specifications to the purpose and general plan and intent of these restrictions. The Architectural Committee shall not arbitrarily or - unreasonably -withhold its approval of such plans and specifications- - .4; Failure to Approve. If the Architectural Committee fail either to approve or to disapprove such plans and specifications (including resubmission of disapproved plans and specifications which have been revised) within thirty • (30) days after the same have been submitted to it (provided that all required information has been submitted) , it shall be conclusively presumed that said plans and specifications have been approved subject , however , to the restrictions contained in Articles V and VI , hereof . The Architectural • Committee shall notify the owner in -writing upon receipt of • all required plans and specifications anc __ the aforesaid . thirty--day period shall commence on the date of such Hertz fie tion. • . No Liability. Neither the Architectural .Committee nor or _ their respective successors `or- assigns shall: be damages to anyone submitting plansto them -for to ri y' -owner' -of iancL af-fectett by this _ • + ' 'De lar do , by reason of mistake in judgement, negligence t` or nonfeasance arising out of or in connection with the . approval or disapproval or failure to approve any such plans •• and, •specifications. Every person who submits plans to the jar cfii terturaI Committee for approval agrees y by submission : . of such plans and specifications, and every owner or tenant of any of said building sites agrees, by acquiring . title • thereto, . or an interest therein, that he will not bring any action or suit against the Architectural Committee of Declarant to recover any such damages. ARTICLE TV • 4_ 1 . Abatement and Suit. The conditions, covenants, restri tt i ons and reservations herein contained shall run with the land, and be binding upon and inure to the benefit • of 25-66 and the owners of every building site on the property, These conditions, covenants,, . reservations and • • 95 rest.rictions may be _enforced as provided hereinafter by 2S- 66 acting -for itself , the Architectural Committee, as Trustee on behalf of all of the owners of building sites_ Each owner by acquiring an interest in the property etuall appoint irrevocably 25-66 as his attorney-in-fact for such purposes; provided, however, that if a building site owner notifies 25-66 of a claimed violation of• these conditions, covenants, restrictions and reservation and 25-66 fails to act . 4ai thz.r: ninety (90) days after receipt -0f such netificat en, then, and in that event only , an owner- may se.p'reiei y, at his own cost and expense, enforce the conditions, covenant. restriction or rese''vatior-1 herein contaieed. Violafien of any condition, covenant, r-estrict.t on car• reservation herein contained shall give to 25,-66 -iele right to• enter upon the portion of the property wherein said violation or breach exists and to summarily • abate arm; remove at the expense of the owner any structure, thing or condition that may be or exists thereon contrary to the intent and meaning of the provisions hereof , or to • ' prosecute a proceeding at law or in equity against the person or ' persons who have violated or are attempting to violate any of these conditions; covenants, restrictions and reservations or . enioin or prevent them from doing so, to cause. said violation to be. remedied or to ..recover damages -for said violation ; • 4.2. Attarr+ F Wa i A. In any legal :or, eq . Bbl a .',prod ing:., . for the enforcement :toy .r esti-14ri:` titian= �f:,::•.�h •-•.:._..::,:��: ,;-•�' ' art Declarat3�::`: i, a��• pr-savi�5i'_r�r�t�hereof 3 the::.;lo�ing >.. .. .or pa es': li'all ay the'::r asorfabte`"` g-:_ the prevailing party or parties i n,• the amount as may.be • fixed by the Court in such proceedings. Al remedies provided herein- or at law or . in. equity shail l; be: cumulative;• t1- f�ot'.excldsive = B. • The failure of the 25-66 to enforce any of the condi tion.s, ' covenants, restrictions or reservations herein ' contained shall in no event be deemed to he a waiver- of the right to do so for subsequent violations or -of the right .to enforce - any • other conditions,.:.:,...; covenants, restrictions or reservations, and 25-66 shall riot be liable therefor. 25-66 may specifically raitie any violation hereof by execution of written ”ral ver which efers to• this Par'a. • • ARTICLE V PERMITTER USES 5. 1 . The property shall be used on y for uses whir"-, arc-. • 900085 • (a) permitted tiy• the Weld County caning ordinances for C--Z, C-4, -euid I-I =ones in effect as a+ the date hereof' , and (b) are : .permitted by the Architectural Committee in . accordance with the standards set forth herein as • reasonably interpretated by such Architectural Comma tteo ARTICLE VI • SPECIFIC UNACCEPTABLE USES 6_ 1. No building Si tE nor any part thereof shall at any time be used for any of the following purposes: a. Salvage Yard b. Junkyards c. Used Auto and/or parts • • id.. Sanitary land 4111s and dumping operations . Slaughter houses or packing p l ant G: f. Quarry and gravel pits • Asphalt plants • • . h. ':. PLb1is Incinerator i... Feed 1 of • '.F :.:(µtiff.•+. - ..omierttot. tniii 4-' 811I LD.I NG AND SrI•T€-:.APECI F I CAT oN • r.'74zf ro merit :: .. troa t 'rt s i nc l ud,i • aftda 7api n sh ._: e..:.con tructad, .... erected, ' 1 aced, altered,74641 ntai ned • Or' . ';:permitted can any builtri'ng site until plans• • and • • -specations herefor have been .Approved in writi'r�g. by: the _ :ArchiteCtural' .' Cammit tee as:•n►tr... .fta11y set forth earl;= Article 'i I....`&r.th -. .Ov e.'an t a. . .. .. . 7_2_ All bui l.di flQ-. and improvements shall be ccnstructEd and maxntaired :by the Cwner in'''accor•dance with the following • standards unless ca:: e c:eption Its approved in writ1no by 'the • - 1r-.chi tec,tura:t. Committee_ . i_t,_ Materials Restriction.. Materials in all exterior walls o+ any building shall be subject to approval of the ArOa;tectrur-a►l Committee. : ..I,t.., i s.-_i.ntended that the.:Following 1 owi ng -gen al”yi `a�i= ' f ► ► "m }� '�eril '�ub'�ett� •"'tci' any Ltsi.•tation stated by such material . ..Masonary • I, Brick • 2. Roca: • T ::tured toricrtte bi oct s. • 9000E6 R_ Cortcret 1 . Architectural pre-cast _concrete 2. Peg:.tIar concrete and tee construction Metals (Generally discouraged) _1_ Combined with rock or -brick 7.4. Paint . Exterior walls shall be painted or otherwise harmonize with the natural surroundings. 7. ;. Electrical and Mechanical . 7- 6. Building Elevation_ Mininum first floor -elevation for all buildings in the F.R. B_P. _.hall be subject to approval by the Archit-ectural Committee dependent upon the location within the F_R_8_P. 7. 7.. Buildings Height. The maximum building height shall be th --t height asciet.er ciji nRd by the Longmont Fire Protection District. That height at the time of this writing is 35 • feet 7.8. Utilit tyies. 413 on site electrical , telephc)ne, aid • other . li lines shall be underground, and shall not be . • exposed;. ::;an the exterior o4 any,: .building or improvement , : mxcept ;:. as.:- specifically authorized in writar-tq by the • - `‘ • Architectural Commi ttee 7.4: :.`Co*tinui ty of Construction. All strt_uctw-es commenced shall be _completed within, eighteen (18.) .months • ' ' ca#°•-``.:-- , cement unless erceptic3rt is granted qty the • Art'list "• ,tef.ail • om ma ttee • 7..1 c?:'` `Site Drai mane. each .building site owner shall:: be requirelf.-•te..:provide adequate drainage facilities as accepted • <: by the :Araiitectural. Comm ttep_ . 7. 11 . Loading F•l atf orms,1 etc. All loading platforms and • _areas facing and near dedicated streets must be screened in • a mariner epproved by the Architectural Committee. 7.. 12. . Outside Storage: This is to be generally discouraged; however . any such area will be fenced and/or screened- in a manner approved by the Architectural Committee. . Cr3eliru�rci ai Si tom '` ...• B. Industrial Site 900085 7. 14. Parking. Any Owner of any building site shall provide on the premises automobile parking facilities for- employees and patrons. A11 _off street parking and access drives and -all loading areas shall be -properly graded to insure proper drainage. On street parking will not be permitted. 7. 15. fences. No fence is to he erected without the .pprova1 of the Architectural Committee. 7. 16. Temporary Structures. No temporary structures are to be allowed except as necessary dur i no the construction period or specifically authorized by the Architectural Committee. 7. 17. i.endscagi no. All building sites shall be landscaped only in accordance with an approved plan prior to any development of the building site. Such landscaping plan shall include information regarding the type of sodding, the type of seeding, types of trees, hedges, and shrubs, and information regarding other customary landscaping treatment. All landscaping shall be undertaken And completed in • accordance with the approved plan and must be completed within ninety (90) days after the completion of the ' • . construction 'of any building on the site; provided however., ' if weather conditions du not at such . time :,permits such .1-andscaping shall, be completed as soon'. .therea►fter as weather - conditions _,,. per3rri t. . •�?� • • • Each owner, tenant, or occupant of an ,.b yui'Id .ng site shall V�e .responsible for landscaping tsrai ntenancp o4 their separate :..... .. , •?::: x�3di:�tg .: 'hls 3ncUcdes.:rriaintaf-Okrig.. •I1. ' . p1.ar�t'irg•;s :... .thereon in good health or appearer%ce• 'and replace dead or di+ceased' specimens without substantial alterations and shall repair any damages thereto occur i.ng by reason Of any cause x.:: whatsoever - 4" It is encor.eraacd that owners use :;eri c •'slow water use) spec i''s of grasses, trees and shrubs. . Irees removed duv-ir,f constr•i+c..ti.Or c:re to be rerp] aced on at lBatt a one tc cn r tio. • • 7. 17. Si airs` . • • ARTICLE VIII GENERAL COVENANTS; RESTRICTIONS, AND LIMITATIONS - • .8_ 1. Wild life Nuisance. . The Master Association and/or the ' :owner shall be responsible for taking care of nuisance wild life problems with n F.R.H.P. Nuisance wild life problems shall be handled in compliance with al 1 appropriate Federal , State, and Local law. 90008S w . 8.2. Trash and Debris Nuisance. . All owners are responsible for their trash and debris at all times. This includes the • construction period. Trash and debris can cause problems with other site owners as well as with irrigation ditches and Foster Reservoir. Failing to control this nuisance will result in either 25-66 or the Master Association cleanino can i no up • the problem and billing the owner- . 8_3. Foster Resor .voi r .. It is and has been a hunting area for at : east twenty five (2c) years and will remain so. It - iis leased out to a hunting club. F.R.R.P. does not have any rights oh or in the Reservoi► - It is off limits to all owners , employees, and quests.. 8.4. Tap and hg.1tk"'uEw All owners shall purchase a "cap and hook up to the St. Vraira Sanitation District sewer line when it becomes available to F.R.D._F. L-'. 5.. Longmont _Fire_ Protection D: strict. All owner .,r-c• to contact. the Loncmont Fire Protection . District prior to requesting a building permit. ARTICLE IX • T£Ri,, TERMINATION AND MODIFICATION AND ASSIGNMENTS- • 9. 1 term. This Declaration, every provision hereof , and • every covenant, condition, restriction and reservation herein shall crnti nue ;i.n full . force and effect for a period f ;-.,.twenty five (25) Years from the date hereof , and shai I :': th•ereafter :be-renewed automatically from -year to year unless and until terminated as provided in Article IX, Paragraph 9.2 hereof . .. ,:z..,. .,_ . ;3.2. Termur+ati.2n And:.Mo¢ifi:rcation. The Declaration or any- • provision hereof , or any co4t?rnant , cortdition�''restrictior� car reservation contained herein, may be terminated, extended, • modi f i ed. or amended, as to 'the whole of said property or • any portion thereof , with the written consent of the owners of a majority of the lots or parcels sold by 25-66 when all are sold subject to these restrictions; provided however , that Burins+ the initial twenty five (25) year term of these covenants, no such termination, extension, modification or amefdrs.ent shall be effective without the written approval of s-bb. Such termination, extension, modification or amendmernt. shall be effective .without the Written approval of • 25e66. Such termination, extensions modification or amendment shall be immediately effective upon recording a . proper instrument in writing, executed and ackowledged by such owners Land by 25-66) as required in the office of the Weld County Clerk , Greeley, Colorado. • 9.3. Assignment of 215-oLs Riaits and Duties. Any and all of the rights, powers and reservations of 72E--- 8 . h�err,in -.._ ._. 9C0095 ** TOTAL PAGE . 011 ** Date: December 5, 1989 CASE NUMBER: Z-452 NAME: Foster Ridge Business Park, c/o James Rees, General Partner, 25-66, Ltd. ADDRESS: -5660 West Plymouth Drive, Littleton, CO 80123 REQUEST: Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) for C-3 (-Commercial) , C-4 (Highway Commercial) , and I-1 (Industrial) uses as listed in the Weld County Zoning Ordinance LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NEI of Section 27, T3N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Meld County, Colorado LOCATION: West of and adjacent to I-25 and south of and adjacent to Colorado Highway 66 THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES' STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THIS REQUEST BE APPROVED FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: 1. The submitted materials are substantially in compliance with the application requirements of Section 28.5 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 2. The rezoning request is in conformance with Section 28.7 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: - The proposed Planned Unit Development (PUD) District 4s located within the urban growth boundary area of the Town of Mead and the I-25 Mixed-Use Development (MUD) area. The proposed PUD district is in compliance with the urban growth boundary goals and policies. The Town Board of Mead reviewed the request in its meeting of November 13, 1989, and found no conflicts with its interest. The attached conditions of approval make the uses associated with the proposed PUD district compatible with the uses described in the 1-25 MUD section of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. - The uses allowed in the proposed PUD district will conform with the performance standards contained in Section 35.3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance; - The uses permitted will be compatible with the existing and future development of the surrounding area as permitted by the existing zone district, and with the future development as projected by the Weld County Comprehensive Plan; - The Long's Peak Water Association will provide water service to the PUD district; 900085 1 Z-452 Foster Ridge Business Park Page 2 - The St. Vrain Sanitation District will provide -sewer service to the PUD district; - State Highway 66 will provide access to the proposed PEP district. Access constraints recommended by the Colorado Department of Highways will be addressed as notes on the PUD district plat and as part of the PUD plan application requirements; The subject site does not contain any known commercial mineral deposits; and - A portion of the proposed PUD district is located within a flood hazard overlay district. The conditions of approval address this concern; The Department of Planning Services' staff recommendation for approval is conditional upon the following: 1 . The following notes being placed on the PUD plat prior to recording: - Prior to site plan approval and issuance of building permits e law enforcement authority shall be formed according to State Law. The law enforcement authority to be formed shall be capable of expanding to serve other areas within the 1-25 MUD area to avoid duplication of overhead and other operating -costs; - All internal streets within the PUD district shall be built to Weld County Standards. The internal PUD streets shall remain private unless other arrangements are approved by the Board of County Commissioners; - There shall be one access from the PUD to State Highway 66. This access shall be located within 200 feet of the west boundary of the property, which is the quarter section line; - A road right-of-way shall be shown on the PUD plan extending to the west property line to allow for future access to property west of the PUD district; - One additional limited access may be permitted in accordance with the requirements of the Colorado Division of Highways; - A Flood Hazard Development Permit will to required for any new construction or the substantial improvement of existing structures in the Floodway or Floodprone Districts located on the property; 2 9..0085 Z-452 Foster Ridge Business Park Page 3 - A Site Plan Review is required in accordance with Section 35.4 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance; - The PUD district shall use the Saint Vrain Sanitation District for sewage disposal; Structures within the PUD district shall not exceed 35 feet in height; The PUD district is permitted one free-standing identification sign. The sign shall not exceed 45 teat in height and 150 square feet per face. The minimum setback shall be 15 feet and the minimum offset shall be 10 feet; - No structure shall be located closer than 600 feet to the highwater mark of Foster Reservoir; - The developer/landowners shall be responsible for taking care of nuisance wildlife problems within the PUD district. Nuisance wildlife problems shall be handled in compliance -with all appropriate federal, state, and local laws; 1. The following items shall be included as part of the PUD plan application materials: - Written information explaining how the proposed uses within the PUD district will be made compatible. Information explaining how the proposed uses within the PUD district will be made compatible with surrounding land uses, including Foster Reservoir; - Written information explaining the operation of the existing oil and gas well is compatible with the proposed uses; - An off-site road improvements agreement proposed for State Highway 66. The proposal shall comply with Section 28.9.1.7 of the Weld County Zoning ordinance; - Written information describing a detailed plan for signage on -each lot within the PUD district. Typical signage examples shall also be shown as an illustration in accordance with _Section 28.10 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance; 940085 3 Z-452 Foster Midge Business Park Page 4 - Written _information explaining how the proposed PUD district will comply with Panhandle Eastern Pipeline Companies requirements as expressed in a letter dated November 2, 1989; - In accordance with Section 28.9.1.7 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, the subdivision improvements agreement shall guarantee the installation of public sewer to the PUD plan subdivision; - A copy of an approved agreement with representatives of the Highland Ditch Company addressing its concerns expressed in a letter dated November 2, 1989; - Information indicating requirements of the Longmont Fire Protection District shall be met; and - A copy of an approved agreement with representatives of the Rademacher Ditch addressing its concerns expressed in a letter dated November 6, 1989. 200085 4 � 1 mEmoRnnDum To I Meld County Planning vita November 28, 1989 Fr Environmental Protection Services I/6454 A COLORADOCOLORADOFrom Ease Number: Z-452 Name: Foster Ridge Business Park Subject: Environmental Protection Services has reviewed this proposal and cannot recommend for approval, due to the soil conditions at the site. The applicant will need to supply additional geo-technical data. This data will be reviewed by the staff to determine compatibility and compliance with County and State Regulations regarding Groundwater and Individual Sewage Disposal Systems. The waste stream flows from commercial, industrial and business complexes are sufficiently large to require extensive evapotranspiration systems. The soil conditions at the site will require more than 25% of the facilities to have evapotranspiration systems. This is prohibited by the Weld County I.S.D.S. Regulations (3. 15, 3.16(a) , 6. 1(c)) . The County Comprehensive plan indicates that this area is to be served by the St. Vrain Sanitation District. The Division requires that the development be served by the sanitation district. WP304/cs 0 r'J J r., vcc 4. 1959 soaps LAND-USE APPLICATION SUMMARY SHEET Date: November 28, 1589 CASE NUMBER: 2-452 NAME: Foster Ridge Business Park, c/o James Rees, General Partner, 25-66 Ltd. ADDRESS: 5660 West Plymouth Drive, Littleton, CO 80123 REQUEST: A Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) for C-3 (Commercial) , C-4 (Highway Commercial) , and I-1 (Industrial) uses as listed in the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. ]LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NE} of Section 27, T3N, R68W of the 6th -P.M., Weld County, Colorado _LOCATION: West of and adjacent to I-25 and south of and adjacent to Colorado Highway 66 Planning Commission Function: To make a recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners based on the information in Section 28.7 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. Project Overview: Proposed zone district: PUD (Planned Unit Development) for C-3 and C-4 (Commercial) and I-1 (Industrial) uses as listed in the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. Size of Parcel 113 acres, more or less Number of acres Commercial Area C-3 and C-4 uses 29.2 acres (34.5%) Number of acres Industrial Area I-1 uses 55.1 acres (48.4%) Number of Acres of Open Space 19.5 acres (17.1%) Structure Height Not to exceed 35 feet Water Longs Peak Water Assn. Sewer Individual Sewage Disposal Access Two accesses from Colorado Highway 66 &&.0085 Land-Use Summary Foster Ridge Business Park Page 2 Streets Privately built to County standards and maintained by developer. Landscaping Low moisture species such as xeric grasses. Trees or shrubs removed are to be replaced. Trees and shrubs to be planted along the Foster Reservoir in the green belt area Fire Protection Longmont Fire Protection District. Police Weld County Sheriff Outside Storage Areas Permitted, but must be visibly screened. Possible issues: The applicant has proposed individual sewage disposal for each use on the property. The location of the property is within the Saint Vrain _Sanitation District, and the Weld County Comprehensive Plan's I-25 Mixed-Use Development area. Individual sewage disposal systems do not _comply with the public sewer requirements for this location. The referral response dated November 28, 1989, from the Weld County Health Department indicated that the Health Department regulations also require public sewers for the proposed development. Larry Rogstad, Colorado Division of Wildlife, in his referral response dated November 21, 1989, expressed concerns with individual sewage disposal systems and impacts to the Foster Reservoir. iteferral agencies who have returned recommendations and referral responses are included in this packet. The Department of 1lanning Services' staff has received no objections to this request. 9U.)085 II; 7 :T h • ' u al 25 �z• zs • 654 a t!' n I 1 It •I 1 : .Il. m - A• I ._._—_— _._(—" I---.— — — !` •1 I i!. it I ' is •I /• • °✓n: • , • • •�4;�Ir ' i a r su• •L ; Hra _ ',: Ep°I� • mu t I �'. ' ------ - -▪- - - - I - - -'----- ..• tt) , , Via' • .• :a . ^ 1 xryy • � j!Iltr OIL i•J' • %Pi i• ..I `VH • P f lro^'EviCCE _ 17 I ed • t1 a 1/. . I ie ..r • r0. } - .once o • • • `r •� ' : 'R am - I , . • ..o•I » t 1 xv. Z, ' Z. • xs ft za ze zr � i _ . � � 3 '• 1�� WI., • •_O I ••Ai • • 1. allR 9.- - - I . ;l ax )' qdd R90UR •ONOS ' ) " '• \ , , N ]p 1 I %2 � ..!�-, i • �q -,:c" r� _-- � • v o�._;,i • • le ice____ • • _ 7 I • \ _ . . )z• ° • D • • -,• el iT )�T„ IFi J ✓ • • ?/ �) 'r �. . . j a.� .e I• f . . 1 �' ,,JJ� CL11 1• Ha .: C {•e✓ l .'e I '© i-•.• • • jai ,p .,,▪ •� I ' Cr ,C� �. .a :• .os.•.j !' • rt , \ .a :) i •i •s C ✓ • 1•• .off • •r �I, . '.� ,._ ° - - 7�' ;;:::k. i \, ▪ t° ,0 �° z}yjr » •xz •i° 33 •I - _ _ I•• --_-_ � ° �LrZE • i'\• (!r• C l:N ._L_ _ ✓._._ _ ,'.___._- I •� o. :••1 ".yi..• • a�_7_.�� • o%gin., 1 EvaN5ioN' 1,ff xs n a I 1/I °el^ :C Cif _ u° •• •1 Iv -I- r.- "fir EL I I• • 1 • :Zr..+, • C�:' r •i• J _ I I 1 REDERC''Y c •, 0 . • •), I• lx CC))1 Is ! f. 1 zs l\ v • 34 •I _to .5.-5,t53 _ 1�� ,yY,yy • \ •N •JrrI• sr' p l\ D.CDN .! // •I I y )F. •e� I• . !• !I ll 2 /1-..--1.`z I ..1a8 l !/Yl 'Es] f ..1:-.1/.:.l:cc! ° n ' t \ I OPT• 'unjoN C. • . ✓ ° l :°:i st� Io•.. :• 7 I.— 1 ^ dSTMIC "'� ' • ' i m )I/ 11 _ jr/) RIE I '� .,n i I ''� / o I . • J •r I n ,� O_ .1• • 'r ..v r -2, • / 1 i il .n • • •• 1 J ,,a / {. lIJploa so z/I a ^ z) oI w zJ !'� 1• Ia. Bp0 I 1(' MEM( / / '1• II :� x= •.1 a • ) .z• • • 1 z xo x zz I u I. •I� . C°nnr 1 o (. l/I. wnx rENeERc _\ 0i 9 °I i I • r�f yL• • I f,•/ ! .4F, 1✓ v 3: jj _._-_.i• roc. --_._.- !] _ � ' __ !! I " " c ' •grin y v " f :j am I • I•' . 1 3.a I• 1 to q r Q a n `x• . ) • ▪ I al 1 P=• z• z. F-j✓ z,•�.' .e '.. , _' _./. - : ._ ▪ to i e� • i l • y :; ax. v • )• ( Il )a 1 "0' 1 I I ••�: III `• • 1 34 •I R.6B'Wi�. . �' I • r Mr 1 .67" R I ; J�.tWeb"'YYY i..4 \ I R.66 W. k _J i.nk1 I ryl Mulligan , �~ 'J Reservoir�)' 21 1 k� 2� �� 3 A a HC i / Io \ \ 7--44 illil r 'r L 66 I y c,znpe w�` t — ' LAS _� _ _ __ 0901 - yy � 4 J / cCe J I 2 / 2 �. , ^ 26 ;.,/ c Foster +' ) M 9 / 1 v \1 Sanborx � ' /r,� •ff -Reservoir � _ �/ (ID I yr, [ (.. / / '� i L lb1993- '— I • ._ 4s� N" a .7 o Kirkland � v A }}\i /-1 ' it � '� . _ i �•l \ 111 1! ; )i / # 1il ,. /rI° moo c ii_aiiiirk,_ 5._-_,,i . ___ \1 I .\ i. 4 = . 850 /" A ' j7� f \ .J A i. "V RAtN / I �� 'C BM l) i:4908 -} 1Ti/ :: --- CH III i / �� — / .. f co ,,5 — _ , ! �s. 1f A ti U . s = l' i ` / .�' J' ' lel, I' L ' '-- �\ r��- _ 04 3 r c 2 -1 . .1 -:_ fl \I44 � t_ _ - , ��49--a.-..- ® -�_ - ,-I — .- - 4843 . . `y'V r fr 10 1 qP + ®�Q8 L C-1 _99x1 • r �� • I :i 5 , „ - �-�.. ryry ,y gggggg 1 s rA. _. 4. le° d # x "� i .r , ... t ,:. ., . \ • , , k ! r • .j��,'+`nyty y} 'rill SYa31 .-:..;.'..:.......4!/./. l'-'4;...1.11:::,,; i ;#41.: ' k":•C%�} c. r t L"a ' t f - f �i i..:tw V di. 'tFa3, {a3 y i3 "t.- f 2 Sl • _ F "1. 'L 1k } r a .k Y „, k xf i". H • k '";?4::, ' t' �y �� .t i. t ii jt iIF Sr�... /—_ • iS F ¢ • tr I • ` µ, wt.fi. IkY! . . ,14.,.., i ki! ' 'yyys. -. t b F � ,,. ...,,,.„4,,,..,,,,..,,,,,...„: ��w - E �G' i {1i „. d� . i 4 04 FIELD CHECK FILING NUMBER: S-301 -DATE OF INSPECTION: April 26, 1989 NAME: 25-66 Ltd. (Jim Reese) REQUEST: Sketch Plan LEGAL DESCRIPTION: NEi of Section 27, T3N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Adjacent to and west of I-25 and south of and adjacent to State Highway 66 LAND USE: N Park to Ride parking area, State Highway 66, two residences, farm production E 1-25, farm production, residence S Farm production, Foster residence W Farm production ZONING: N Agricultural E PUD, C-4, and A S Agricultural W Agricultural COMMENTS: The current land-use is farm production. One irrigation ditch cuts through the Northeast quarter oI the property heading east, one irrigation ditch follows the west edge of the property heading south and a power line runs along the south property line. An oil and gas production facility is located on the south end of the property. The topography of the property is smooth with a slope from the northeast corner down to the southwest corner with minor existing landscaping (cottonwood trees along the ditch) . Access to the property is off State Highway 66, a minor arterial, with a 150 foot right-of-way. ly: I�t it . A. S" Sch tc�Current Planner 900085 DEPARt 'NT OF T'LANNING SERVICES 1;:ir PHONE(303)156-4000 EXT.4400 915 10th STREET IRGREELEY,COLORADO 80631 T •.:.-�:.4 • COLORADO May 15, 1989 25-66, Limited Attention: Jim Rees P.O. Box 1764 Englewood, CO 80150 Re: Planned Unit Development (PUD) Sketch Plan application located in part of the NEi of Section 27, T3N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado Dear Mr. Rees: The Department of Planning Services' staff has completed a review of -a Planned unit Development sketch plan on 113 acres, more or less. The Sketch Plan comments and agency responses are not intended to be all inclusive. Other concerns may arise during the Planned Unit Development Change of Zone and Planned Unit Development Plan application Processes. Copies of the following referral agencies comments are enclosed: Weld County Health Department; Weld County Sheriff's Office; Weld County Engineering Department; State Highway Department; State Oil and Gas Conservation Commission; Longmont Fire Protection District; Highland Ditch Company; U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; Colorado Division of Wildlife; and Longmont Soil Conservation District. If you decide tc proceed with the PUD process, the next step is to apply for a PUD District. The PUD District procedure is explained in Section 28.4 through 28.8 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. The Department of Planning Services' staff has the following comments. 1. The PUD Sketch Flan does not appear to meet the Weld County Comprehensive Plan's I-25 MUD Area Goals and Policies, and the Public Facilities and Services Goals and Policies. The proposed sewage system for the PUD is septic and evapotranspiration, with the ability to change to public sewer once a public sewer system main is extended to the perimeter of the PUD. The policy in the Weld County Comprehensive Plan requires public sewer for commercial and industrial development within the I-25 Mixed—Use _Development Area. C 4 25-66 Limited May 15, 1989 Page 2 2. The FUD Sketch Plan does not appear to meet the -Transportation PP P _Goals and Policies of the Weld County Comprahensiv- Flan. The proposed accesses as shown on the sketch plan at intervals of 1,400' and 760' ara not consistent with the State Highway Access Code as identified in Wally Jacobson's April 25 letter. 2. The PUD Sketch Plan design does not appear to comply with Section 35.3 Performance Standards of the Weld County Subdivision Regulations. The design of the PUD should demonstrate how a development with uses that will vary from C-1 (neighborhood _commercial) to C-3 and C-4 (highway commercial) as listed by right in the Weld County Zoning Ordinance can be made compatible with the existing and surrounding land uses, including Foster Reservoir an _important wildlife habitat and I-25, a principal arterial. You should consider use of special setbacks, screenings, berms, fences, landscape buffers to ensure compatibility. 4. The PUD District should clarify whether additional oil and gas production could occur on the property. The PUD District application materials should demonstrate flow oil and gas production will be compatible with the proposed C-1, C-2, C-3, D-4, and I-1 uses. The use of special setbacks, screening, fencing, and access roads to the wells may be used to ensure compatibility within the proposed Planned Unit Development District. _5. Information should be included with the PUD District application which satisfies concerns expressed by the following: a. William R. Emerson, Fire Marshal, Longmont Fire Protection District, in his letter date April 28, 1989; b. Wes Potter, Weld County Environmental Protection Services, in his memo dated May 1, 1989; c. Drew Scheltinga, Weld County Engineer, in his memo dated April 21, 1989; d. Orville L. Sadar, President, Longmont Soil Conservation district, in his letter dated April 19, 1989; e. Wallace Jacobson, State Highway Department, Development Planning and Access Coordinator, in his letter dated April 25, 1989; f. William R. Smith, Director, Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, in his letter dated April 25, 1989; S00085 e 25-66 Limited May 15, 1989 Page 3 g. Ed Jordan, Weld County Sheriff, in his memo, dated April 19, 1989; and h. Terry McKee, Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Resource Specialist, in his letter dated April 17, 1989. i. Larry Rogstad, Colorado Division of Wildlife, District Wildlife Manager, in his letter dated May 12, 1989. 6. As part of Section 28.9.21 of the PUD district application, Geologic maps and investigation reports regarding area suitability are to be submitted. A copy of the PUD district application, maps, and reports will be forwarded to the Department of Natural Resources, Colorado Geological Survey Division for its review. -The Colorado Geological Survey Division charges a separate fee for this review which must be paid upon submittal of the PUD district application. Please telephone or write if you have any questions about the PUD procedures or the sketch plan review. Sincerely, Keit Schuett Current Planner KAS:dn _pc Gerald McRae McRae and Short 1231 8th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 -enclosures Am S00985 __ D ( LAI:NED UNIT DEVELOPMENT) REZONING APPLICATION Case #: Dept. of Planning Services App. Ch'd By: Date Rec'd: 915 10th Street App. Fee: 4,,oc> Receipt is C71b—1 Greeley, Colorado 80631 Record. Fee: Receipt #: Phone: 356-4000, Ext. 4400 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT. Please print or type, except for necessary signature. I (we) , the undersigned, hereby request hearings before the Weld County Planning Commission and the Weld County Board of County Commissioners concerning the proposed rezoning of the following described unincorporated area of Weld County, Colorado: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: THE NEa OF SECTION 27, T3N, R68W of the 6thP.M. , EXCEPT SHAT PORTION THEREOF CONVEYED TO THE HIGHLAND DITCH CO. BY WARRENTY DEED RECRDED IN BOOK 207 AT PAGE 394, WELD COUNTY AND EXCEPT THOSE PORTIONS THEREOF CONVEYED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF HOGHWAYS, STATE OF COLORADO BY SPECIAL WARRENTY DEEDS RECORDED IN BOOK 1500 AT PAGE 549 AND BOOK 1553 AT PAGE 513, WELD COUNTY RECORDS. (If additional space is required, attach an additional sheet) Property Address (if available) : PRESENT ZONE AGRICULTURE PROPOSED ZONE PUD TOTAL ACREAGE 113 acres OVERLAY ZONES SURFACE FEE (PROPERTY OWNERS) OF AREA PROPOSED FOR REZONING: Name: 25-66, Ltd. Home Telephone #: Address: 5660 W. PLYMOUTH DR LITTLETON. CO. Bus. Telephone # 762-1254 80123 • Name: Home Telephone #: Address: Bus. Telephone ll: Name: Home Telephone #: Address: Bus. Telephone #: Applicant or Authorized Agent (if different than above) : Name: JAMES F REFS CFNERAT PARTNER Home Telephone /{: Address: 5660 W. PLYMOUTH D11., LITTLETON, en Bus. Telephone # T62-1254 80123 Owner(s) and/or lessees of mineral rights on or under the subject properties of record in the Weld County Assessor's Office: Name: ST MRATN LAND CO. Address: -o N WIRY ST. DENVER, CO. 80229 Name: AMOCO PRODUCTION CO Address: j670 BROADWAY P_n Rnx 800 -DFp'VER,GQ. 80201 Name: UNION PACTFTC RF,SOnRrFQ Address: 8774 YATFc DP QUITE 100 WRSTMTNTSTFR, CO ROn3n I hereby depose and state under the penalities of perjury that all statements, proposals and/or plans submitted with or contained within this application are true and ccrrPrt to the best of my knowledge. COUNTY OF WELD ) STATE OF COLORADO ) i PARTNER �. ignatu : /�Owne or Authorized Agent / Subscribed and sworn to before me this /4 ,/_1 day of ,Q iynj pt , 195971 SEAL h yJ lL�a� t pc_i %LI B '��/i NOTARY PUBLIC S7/& .0�. .4/a o�iCs, My Cc:njss r n eires: �O �%/ A 900085 REES & COMPANY P. 0. Box 1764 • ENoL-Ew000,CO 80150-1764 • (303) 762-1254 1601 N. COLLEGE Ave., #321 i FORT COLLINS,CO B0524 •(303) 493-4943 October 18, 1989 Mr. Keith Schuett Current Planner Weld County Department of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 RE: Change of Zone 25-66LTD Foster -Ridge Business Park NEa, Section 27, -Township 3 North, R 68 West Dear Keith: -Enclosed is the Change of Zone application for 25-66LTD which we have named Foster Ridge Business Park. We wish at this time to proceed with the rezoning process. Please review the enclosed application and materials and contact me if you have -any questions or comments. SinSerely, James E. Ree General Partner 25-66LTD cc: Gerry McRae 200085 :'D (. ..•.`:rn I';;IT DEVELOPMENT) REZPNII:G APPLICATION Ce:e Dept. of Planning Services App. Ch'd Py: Datc Recd: 915 10th Street App. Fce: Receipt e: Greeley, Colorado 80631 Record. iLe: Receipt a: Phone: 356-4000, fat. +400 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT. Please print or type. -except tor necessary signature. I (ve), the undersigned, hereby request hearings before the Weld County Planning Commission and the Weld County Board of County Commissioners concerning the proposed -rezoning of the following described unincorporated area of Weld County, Colorado: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: THE NE% OF SECTION 27, T3N, RASH of the 6thP.H., EXCEPT TEAT PORTION THEREOF CONVEYED TO THE HIGHLAND DITCH CO, IT WARRENTY DEED RECRDED IN BOOK 207 AT PACE 394, WELD COUNTY AND EXCEPT THOSE PORTIONS THEREOF CONVEYED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF HOGHWAYS, STATE OF COLORADO BY SPECIAL WARRENTY DEEDS RECORDED IN BOOK 1500 AT PAGE 549 AND BOOK 1553 AT PAGE 513, WELD COUNTY RECORDS. (If additional space is required, attach an additional sheet) Property Address (if available): PRESENT ZONE AGRICULTURE PROPOSED ZONE PUD TOTAL ACREAGE Ill acres OVERLAY ZONES SURFACE FEE (PROPERTY OWNERS) OF AREA PROPOSED FOR REZONING: Name: 25-66. Ltd. Home Telephone C: Address: 5660 W. PLYMOUTH DR LITTLETON. CO. Bus. Telephone C: 762-1254 80123 ! Name: Home Telephone I: • Address: Bus. Telephone /: • ..ame. Home Telephone a: Address: Bus. Telephone I: Applicant or Authorized Agent (if different than above): Name: TAMPS V RFFC, r.FNFRAf PARTNVR Home Telephone I: -Address:5600 W PLYMOUTH DR.. ITTTIFTON,, rn Bus. Telephone I: 7A2_1254 80123 Owner(s) and/or 1 f mineral rights on or under the subject properties of record in the Weld County Assessor's Office: Name: ST YRATe t5atn Cn Address: Aoee N rnRy c, DR,man, C1 Y0'39 IName: Amen PRODWrTTon rn Address: IATO RRnatuAY P n pity son Diwuge fn, gn20t Name: 1 VNTnN Par TFir RF Cnnerpc Address: PM VATRe !ID Cm re too WFSTMTNTCTFa, rn annm I hereby depose and state under the penelitiee of perjury that all statements, proposals and/or plans submitted with or contained within this application are true and correct to • the beat of my knowledge. COUNTY OF WELD ) STATE OF COLORADO ) _ �`Y'rizedt gentNea (gnaw a or Authorized Agent Subscribed and sworn to before me this pi day of -.4Of1e1LtL , 19,1i. SEAL My asen. /,l NOTARY PUBLIC 37/O .! Pli e_ Y Ccf ,:n e tress CIO lG./Q1.l,,-., t 900085 LIST DF EXHIBITS A• Green -Belt Areas B. Letter -from Longs Peak Water Association C. Letter -from St. Vrain Sanitation District. D. Traffic Study E. Soil Conservation Service Report F. Amoco and Union F'acifir Letter G. Flood Plain Map H. Surface Owners I . Mineral Owners and Lessees J. Owners and Users of Ditches K. Summary of Covenants 900085 1 . The PUD distrizt appllication fzrrms and application fee. The PUD District application forms and application -fee of 4600.00 are attached. 2. A statement describing the proposed PUD Concept, land-uses(s) ,(s) , and architectural style of the PUD. The 1 1:3+ acres IUD will have commercial and business and light industrial uses. The Commercial and Business uses will be Located in the northeast corner and along the frontage of Colorado Highway 66. The light industrial will be -south of the commercial . Green belt _areas will divide most of the commercial and light industrial in the northeast quarter of the property. Also along the west and southern property line are green belt areas. I-2 , adjoins the east property line. The PUD will have r_c'venants that will delineate architectural and design featur-es of the PUD. Other areas covered by the covenants will be landscaping, maintenance, fencing, signs and building material. • A statement which demonstrates the proposed PUD rezoning is consistent with the policies of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. the proposed PUD does comply with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan identifies specific land use goals and policies that are intended to provide guidance and direction for existing and future land use. The property also lies within the I-25 Multiple Use District.. Thm, Comprehensive Flan discusses areas to be addressed. Those that are not specificly mentioned in detail later • in this report will be touched upon here. a. The property lies within the Mead Urban Growth Area and we have had preliminary unofficial talks with representatives of Mead and will continue to do so. b. Transportation is discussed in detail later. We have kept ingress-egress points to a minimum for a project this size to two as the traffic study will indicate. 900085 c. Mineral Resources -- There is presently oil and gas production on the property operated by Amoco Production Company. It is my understanding that the well goes to the "J" sand -- spacing every 320 acres. This well has been producing for quite some time. I have not been able to yet any information from Amoco as to any future plans either expansion of operations or continuance or curtailment. Union Pacific Resources owns the coal rights. According to the map of Weld County Coal Resources, there are no coal deposits on our land. There are also no deposits of sand and gravel on this property. d. Environmental Duality and Natural Resources 1 . Water will be provided by the Longs Peak Water Association. Air -- The PUD will have no industry or business that pollutes the air. 3. Noise also will not exceed excessive levels. .1 . Wild Life - In talking with the Division of Wild Life, we have agreed to do everything possible to protect the wild life areas in and on our property. We have agreed to comply with their concerns where possible and feasable. S. Solid Waste -- This will be adhered to at all times. c'. Open Space is covered later in this report. f . Public Facilities -- We have discussed with the Fire District their requirements. We will draft a covenant which will protect their interest as well as ours. Basically it will require property owners in the PUI) to contact. the Fire District before applying for a building permit to assure the District that they will be in compliance. The Sheriff 's office has not been contacted as of yet because they are already patroling in the general vacinity and we do not know at this time if and when we would need any special consideration from them other than routine patrols. 900085 g. -The land i s not prime agricultural land in that only about. 50;: is farmed and that is not considered prime. Only C-3, C--4 , and I--1 uses are included in the PUD. 4. A statement which demonstrates how the _USES allowed by the proposed PUD rezoning will be compatible within the PUD district. In addition, a detailed description of how any conflicts between land uses within the PUD district are being avoided or mitigated and can comply with Section 35.3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. The compatibility of uses within the PUD will be maintained by green belt , fencing, landscaping, etc . Also in one area of the PUD separation between Uses will be maintained by terrain levels as well as green belt. Compatibility will also be maintained by design , architectural , etc. which will be outlined in the covenants for the PUD. The conflicts of ltses within the PUD pertain to oil and gas production which is in the green belt area and does require no building or structure within 204? feet. Also we will maintain an area of 50 ' x 250 ' around their tank battery as requested also providing at least a 15 ' access easement to the well -and tank battery. The other concern is the Wild Life. Having met with Larry Rcrgstad, District Wild Life Manager, we discussed his concerns as stated in his response to our sketch plan application. He had nine points in this letter and we agreed to the best of our ability to abide by his suggestions. The majority of which can be included in a covenant. The above conflicts c?+ land uses will comply with section ti5. -; of the zoning ordinance. The well and tank battery can be fenced and screened with trees and or shrubs. Proper access will be provided. The open space because of the Wild Life will he more scenic than recreational . A statement which demonstrates how the USES allowed by the proposed PUD rezoning will be compatible with land uses surrounding the PUD district; in addition, a detailed description of how any conflicts between land uses surrounding the PUD district are being avoided or mitigated. The USES in the PUD are compatible with the surrounding land uses. The northern boundary of the PUD whi c.h has a Commercial use is Colorado Highway 66. 9c0085 The land use to the west of the PUD is agricultural . There is also a large (3G'1 ' wide) irrigation titch between the two properties that creates natural separation. Lots will back up to the irrigation ditch because of the design of the internal, street pattern. In the southwest corner of the F'UD is Foster Reservoir and the Sout treast is agriculture. This is separated by green belt which consists of marsh land and/or wet lands. This will be preserved as green belt and serve as a buffer between hunters on the Reservoir and any buildings etc. It will also preserve wildlife habitat. The east property line is 1-25. The property east of I725 is general business or tight industrial and there is development. The entire i.nterchange is listed in the Comprehensive Plan as Multiple-: Use District . 6. A description of each use within the PUD. A description of all building, structures, and open storage areas, including size, floor area, and height. A description of the type of residential units within the PUD, including total number of units for each type. The uses within the PUD will be C-3, C--4, and 1-1 . There will be no residential uses in the PUD. Outside storage will be held to a minimum. However , any outside storage that does occur will be fenced and screened with either bushes or trees or both and possibly beermed. It is difficult to describe any buildings or structures as we do not know at this time how large they might be. The maximum height of any structure will be determined by the Fire Authority and their ability to service that height. Presently 35 feet. Any large outside parking areas will be landscaped and screened as much as possible from other users. 7. A description of the size and type of any public and private open space and semi-public uses, including parks, recreation areas, school sites, fire and sheriff facilities, and similar uses. The open space consists of 19. 5 acres ( 17% of total _acres) . These acres are delineated in Exhibit A. Also each lot will have open space and landscaping according to covenants. The green belt areas. in Exhibit A will 9C0085 be maintained as best as possible to preserve and protect the wildlife existing there now. The large trees along the internal irrigation ditches will be retained where possible. The marsh and wet lands around the Foster Reservoir will be retained as open space with limited recreational use. Basically we are attempting to preserve the green belt area in its natural state for the protection of the wild life in the area;. Each lot will have a minimum requirement of 1S"/, open `pace. The percentage will increase with lot size. No tots are anticipated to he less than one acre in size. In talking with the Fire Authority, they did not indicate a desire to locate in our PUD. The Sheriff 's department has not been contacted on this matter and neither has any other enitity. B. A description of the water source and system and a statement from the representative of the provider of the water system which demonstrates that the water supply quality and quanity is .sufficient to meet the requirements of the uses within the PUD district. A PUD district with residential USES shall be served by -a PUBLIC WATER system. The Longs Peak Water Association will provide the water for the PUD. The internal system will be developed in -conjunction with the Water Association and the Fire Authority. A letter from the water association is Exhibit B. 9. A -description of the sewage disposal facility. If the facility is a sewer system, a statement from the representative of the provider of the sewer system utility which demonstrates that the sewer system will adequately serve the uses within the PUD district. The initial sewage systems will be individual sewage disposal systems until such time as it is economically feasible to connect with the St. Vra►in Sanitation District. Covenants will contain provisions that when it is economically feasible to connect to St. Vrain Sanitation District that all. land _owners will be required to so or an improvement district will be formed to handle the situation. A letter from the District is attached as Exhibit C. 10. A description of the functional classification, width and structural capacity of the STREET and highway facilities which provide access to the PUD district. If the street or highway 900085 • facilities providing access to the PUD District are not adequate to meet the requirements of the proposed district the applicant shall supply information which demonstrates the willingness and financial capability to upgrade the STREET or highway facilities in conformance with the Transptartation Section of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. This shall be shown by submitting, with the Planned Unit Development District application, a separate off site road improvements agreement describing the proposed road improvements and method of guaranteeing installation of said improvements in conformance with the Weld County Policy on £ollateral for Improvements. The agreement shall be used for the purposes of review, evaluation, and compliance with this section. No rezoning shall be finally approved by the Board of County Commissioners until the applicant has submitted an improvements agreement or contract which sets forth the form of improvements and guarantees and is approved by the Board of County Commissioners. F'i traffic access analysis has been completed by Leigh , Scott & Cleary, Inc . and is attached to the application av Exhibit D. their reccommendati. ons are contained in the analysis. Can , which is the phasing of the im- provements as traffic requires. The payment for- such improvements will come from the proceeds of land sales by 25-66 LTD D and/or a formation of a special improvement Aistrict formed by land owners ad jsii ni ng and benefiting from said improvements. They internal streets will be built by the developer and will be built as required. The county's responsibility for the streets begins when the county is willing to accept them and the streets have been brought up to county standards. 11 . -A soil survey and study of the site proposed for the change of zone with a statement regarding suitability of soils to support all USES allowed in the proposed zone. If the soils survey and study indicate soils which present moderate or severe limitations to the construction of STRUCTURES or facilities on the site, the applicant shall submit information which demonstrates that the limitations can be overcome. This information will be forwarded to the Colorado Geological Survey for evaluation. The Soil Conservation Service s_oi 1 s report is being used by the sievel oper at the present time. Upon approval of the PUD and prior to any construction a soils report by a pr'ofes'sional engineer will be obtained t.i; provide design information for the developer arid purchasers. The +rt. ,( adjoining Fop_.LE:•r Reservoir is subject to f J oc,rii r,y 6rrcd i. ft; r sI,y ,aI IA will remain r-pc:T1 pace. :1ee E_;,h i Er i t E. 900085 • 12. If, according to maps and other information available to Weld County, the Department of Planning Services determines that there appears to be a sand, gravel , or other mineral resource on or under the subject property, the applicant shall provide a mineral resource statement prepared by a certified geologist or other qualified expert. The statement shall indicate the estimated quality of resources and indicate the economic feasibility of recovery, now _and in the future, of the resources so that the Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners can determine whether a COMMERCIAL MINERAL DEPOSIT, as defined in Colorado Revised Statutes is contained on or under the subject Properties. This information will be forwarded to the Colorado Geological Survey for evaluation. According to maps provided with the Comprehensive Plan there are no sand and or'avel deposits on the property. Also there are no coal deposits. Coal rights by Union Pacific. 4 are owned There is, however , an oil !gas will operated by Amoco Production Company. Se Exhibit. F . 13. If the proposed change of zone is located within a FLOOD HAZARD AREA, identified by maps officially adopted by Weld County, applicant shall submit information which either documents how the - Weld County supplementary regulations concerning flood plains have -been satisfied or document how the applicant intends to meet the requirements of the Weld _County supplementary regulations concerning flood plains. All land within this proposal PUD lies outside any Flood Plain Areas. See Exhibit G. 14. If the proposed change of zone is located within a GEOLOGIC HAZARD AREA identified by maps officially adopted by Weld County, the applicant shall submit information which either documents how the Weld County supplementary regulations concerning geologic hazards have been satisfied, or documents how the applicant meet the requirements of the Weld County supplementary regulations concerning geologic hazards. The PUD is not located within any Geologic Hazard Areas as defined by the Geological Hazard Map adopted by Weld County on April 19, 1978. 15. A sign shall be posted on the property under construction for PUD rezoning. The sign shall be posted by the applicant , who shall 900085 certify that the sign has been posted for at lest ten ( 10) days preceding the hearing date. The sign shall be provided by the Department of Planning Services. The required sign shall he posted by the appl i caret. on they property and the applicant shall certify that the sign was posted at. least. 10 days prior to the hearing date. tb. A certified list of the names, addresses and the corresponding parcel identification number assigned by the Weld County Assessor of the owners of property (the surface estate) within five hundred (500) feet of the property subject to the application. The source of such list shall be the records of the Weld County Assessor, or an ownership update from a title or abstract company or attorney, derived from such records, or from the records of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. If the list was assembled from the records of the Weld County Assessor, the applicant shall certify that such list was assembled within thirty (30) days of the application submission date. certified list of property owners within 500 feet of the property was prepared by fr-ansamer i.ca Title and is at.tr:,che=d as Exhibit H. 17. A certified list of the names and addresses of mineral owners and lessees of mineral owners on or under the parcel of land being considered. The source of such list shall be assembled from the records of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder, or from an ownership update derived from such records of a title or abstract company or prepared by an attorney derived from such records. A certified list of names and addresses of mineral owners and lessees of mineral owners on or under the property was prepared by Transamerica Title Company andis aattached as Exhibit. I . 15. Such additional information as may be required by the Department of Planning Services, the Planning Commission or the Board of County Commissioners in order to determine that the application meets the goals, policies, and standards set forth in the Weld County Zoning Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan. The names and addresses of users of the ditches that cross or adjoin our property are listed in Exhibit J . i- bri €.f summary or rJe5Cr-lpt:ao of the cn �:-r.:;�✓rnHnt.n are in E Illl.ri t K. ► r c:pc�_�F..d 900085 • �. !'•IT41t1F"f it rl' t4'•: r• , uti t tit. r+l'i t r,-t1 I• I .y, HI10.1(.4•IV LJt::ir4i t.11,' .4.1 r 1I 11'v' 4"1''..4a111111(:'ilCjl':'r-1 t..l f-i y W i;.i.. 1.; 4 !: t �'i I.i" l t l .f !" L . I_cMgm(irtt. F l.r r: t'r it t 'r't 4-.; ts. WI1 wx t h t , 1 1' 1%1.1r' t . ;: .>trrl • -' rte' } �.-.;:irt rlr;r� f!� �:, 1Ic.; -� r •i.I.11l] Y'l?rltl�ITt'.::; !Ilti ri (I1 1( :'1:1 (..C)‘..,i..'iirit4'! ti 4? ;t. p r (.t:F i l: 1— t.,;;f4 t'c'.iif r:rl'r'iJ ;it...! , .ti tt+ E•• 1+1.1] ! (.!' ;try .74);.1 4 I iir,g. 4_:(:.11i!:'r:,r i4 , ,t 1.i i i 1.I i.. aCiC:Jr'Fac_5[..i� ,'ii; (2c.i .11it- y t:l i'j J 11:_'r 4 „ •'1 i':ty `., 11rF.': ' ..1; Fa. .. I;T1 ! tli•tnT +'t'1 I • 7'r'+I i I : !t,' r • t'r't c-iii I:i/: rti•4't{4: i ._i7. .1 y . Ii41 ' . :I :I, t':r: t.(j !y 1.-It;:.:(:.') from t.hr. T. rr:r1.:' tit 1 �- •r: ;:r( ... fir, .,� ict tt' .t c't 1.,-) 1 hr. I'i'i yt;av ,;if C: Grir-'rri':tlrii. :"1; i Con::t.•;. .� 1:1!. Iiy r:tr•a r. t •• : he.- (—?• tile di a.1.i'i 1:7_. ! (_: ••J iii ,:ii •1!i l=,p. ' l T r F. t';i t+.i1. , . i f _.... .._ ..., ,31 , �.. 1:i1� i.:.1(�i.� (''tFl :.,-sr.i. 4.11N 1'•I f::l :+ 111(:i 1•Ic:;t-..,(' !:s f-'I rit•i,. :'li... r l't{r t r:'I t tic h':; 4:•(i.-.4.., I ring t.t'it: ditche-"-. Weeds, tNx 1 :1 I1t:, ( Ct('i7 i'i;;r � J f..•(.a chit'J 14(_i t,t3t'ic•t.C tti. t. Cfi`' etf'ty 13l.tJ ]. rJing. and i)i�' (..Cirl:,E'C Val Ofl I __fii(iIi (J-.$).C..4n the r'(11E-'* 1 the C:Ofli(lis;t=>i (.:!(-i Intl ; 1 lrr: (tittered to I:4rit.h ctCl:est.si 1'il .I. ]. t.v t-C., ! t'it" Wl?i 2. arid f EyflC i nC:1 !:•t:r E3i:'fil fiE:) y itr;d Set f , Sher.i.f f• - I tlt: c.:4 mat i c1r! o+; - L..ap Er-,tor-c E_mcent. t ut.hot.' i t.y iwr:t. 11 hi, ] ook ed i.tit c. Wi.U1 :i; r}a I.and owner :�.<:, ,(::::c ].tiJ.e• c., i;t tit fir 1:41.t.(.t i CIn -For 1-hf' eri t.,' r ia. Arcuv I.;tir' rir.;i r•!• — •=l"r IiIJ ; :Ir-:i r-r..,t:;t+•I r 1.'d. !T. or. 1,: .r:t � 'i 1.1 VI; 1 '. L.l.t'i:! -• .y I-ht__'(.1•.:-11;Cr ,d :�, ,:1 ' ≤ r..:,lc:�:,r'1t F1i f: � tai t ii'4 l. rr $(-71"rr'4,(lii'iil !.d; i:I, t J ....an I'll In 1441,; tvi • b�) 1. ! t.(._I((it:,1 t•iJ I'-1 hi ] �s r r:'rltti:: t ._: 1••11;i'1"e.' . : r' 1 i1<: c. t. ! S00085 EXHIBIT "A" 900055 LEGEND --_._.__.N '-'^" . Soonnnry of Soil Type � S - S h e./ Type See et Raper♦ f.r e on.r,.n n .Is n. . US_C -Boo poor Seale /'•zoo' Northeast eNner$ee 27, 02 TIN.,R.44 W. East eh,„re,(.0,, -- S.00•//'oOYC 245).!/' J<e r.en 27 — O el ry /NTERF 'TE HWY. 25 J� , a -- - _ ,500•//00-/0 55).60' k r !01955' i%i 23'E. .0;e1 l) i I 1 lb '-t- -30`)*-I 1 e 11 t.,... i i tki O _ _ IN S W C0MM ER /AL i -- - 9 � �" iI r 00 h� °$ w {P i ri to i • W t a0Y ti-t i i� N1 -ph a 60' I Pi I �. s. • O j • - w �.I'.i' y 0. ti �f N.n ---_44 44 . �•ir.1 00 �g i o.7s•/e9e teak 51 t4, .�•�p l�. -_— —. ._ fMMnd/e bsrer.r RM/•nr Mprn/ /b 4 trey_ ��,�•�� "k 5\ - - i Opr/.be n$e enl-'nap/, /655/72 } ^ °i �•_ 1 gJ •i /wN County need/ F e� 1111 Sj-ry--- 1_ _.. _i I Pa1.per Slott 6'eara/ien I TiM.,,/44 Irroe.elr. I X1..1 ; `— 6*/I OP, y Records l-rreytiM/612633 �`\_/II1{I�17 B2 / e° Mr&henry _ _ °° FOSTER RESERVO% COMMERCIAL 1 - _ • 5 0 60'R 0(typ) • Q' 4 W ,t N.tit I Xe ow.tSrr,Rerne 6! • .L.m p1 44°ti —].TN40 � it / . . .�.�.�. .� ��6'f1. CCollor ✓rm/:,n� ' ylr `'24.JT N00•CJ'laE /// /47405' //37 J)' 42 Crnlah.ne NteNteN\Ono,/ \ er:drh retries LAND USE ce.nmere,e/ _ 352 :oc. (3+5%) nor,-nes• and Light /n J..rn./ _ 55./a ee. (4e.a) Open Spate • /9.Tr de (/7/ V.) 900085 EXHIBIT "B" 200055 'Itititt*". 7 . LONGS PEAK ta �� WATER ASSOCIATION z� W, " PO. BOX 714 • LONGMONT, CO 80502-0714 • (303) 776-3847 September 15 , 1989 Jim Rees P .O . Box 1764 Englewood CO 80150 Dear Mr . Rees : The Longs Peak Water -Association approved at its regular monthly Board of Directors meeting on September 14 , 1989 the commitment to service water to your property on Highway 66 and Interstate 25 . One tap will be furnished subject to compliance by you with the rules , charges , and regulations of the Association and subject to the purchase of this tag and any extensions or upgrading of lines in accordance with the engineering requirements of the Association . Longs Peak Water Association can and will serve water to this tap . This statement of willingness to serve will remain valid for a period of six months from the date of this letter. ,,incerely , r` Jose hine Anderson Secretary-Treasurer jea 200085 EXHIBIT "C" 900085 cSL. (Vza G S in a1zaaatI012 1�tizic[ (cSi ni cSa,zl ?,l;pf,.,,,, boo `1Gn,G.,,4 cSi,.zi /4O4/ rrn y.,.„ December 21, 1988 S << 1; 1'onronl, w Fool Mr. Jim Rees Rees A Company 1601 N. College Avenue, #321 Fort Collins, Colorado 80524 Re: 25-66 LTD Partnership Dear Jim: This letter relates to the Property of referenced partnership, located on the southwest corner of the Interstate 25 and Colorado Highway 66 interchange. It is in response to your presentation to the Board of Directors of this District at its December 8, 1988 regular board meeting. The Board agrees that it is unfeasible to extend a wastewater collection line from its wastewater treatment plant to your property for a small development. Such an extension would involve a lift station and force main, Northside interceptor, miles for major line, and major bore under I-25. At the same time, the Board wants your property to participate with other developments in extending a wastewater collection line to this area and to connect as early as is feasible. To this end, St. Vrain Sanitation District supports your rezoning application and development nn the condition that you and the District enter into an agreement that addresses a time certain when you annex your property to the District and the utilization of temporary individual disposal facilities pursuant to the four (4) conditions set forth in Section 3.3 Connection to District System of its Rules and Regulations (copy attached). When you are ready to proceed, please deposit $1,000 with this District to reimburse its legal , engineering and administrative costs of developing the above mentioned agreement. A final cost adjustment will be made upon its completion. I trust this meets your needs. Please contact me if you need additional information. ML s, L. D. Lawson, P.E. Manager LDL:js Enclosure cc: Wallace H. Brant, Esq. President 900085 EXHIBIT "D" 9C0085 Leigh, Scott 81 Cleary, Inc. TRANSPORTATION PLANNING 11 049 York Street &TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS Dcnvcr,Colorado 8020(1 Offices in Denver and Colorado Springs 13071 311-1105 July 20, 1989 �- ---- - -�-� - Mr. James E. Rees Rees & Company P.O. Box 1764 Englewood, CO 80150-1764 RE: I- 25/SH 66 P.11.1). (LSC #890400) Dear Mr. Reps: We have completed a traffic access analysis for a proposed 113-acre commercial--business development, to be located within the southwest quadrant of the I-25/State Highway 66 interchange in Weld County, Colorado. For purposes of this analysis, it has been assumed that about 35 percent (39 acres) of the site will be developed with highway-oriented commercial uses and that the remaining 74 acres will be light industrial uses (55 acres) and open space. The remainder of this report addresses the traffic impact and access characteristics of the proposed development . Site Location and Existing Traffic Figure 1 , enclosed, illustrates the location of the site relative to the nearby roadway system. As indicated, SH 66 forms the site's north boundary and I--25 is along the east boundary. SH 66 is an important east/west route between Lyons on the west andPlatteville on the east. It is generally provided with a two-lane cross-section, 8-foot paved shoulders and is posted with a 55 mph speed limit. In the vicinity of I-25, the SH 66 speed limit is reduced to 50 mph. I-25 is the most important north/south freeway in the state. In the vicinity of SH 66, it provides for two lanes in each direction and is posted for 65 mph maximum speeds . All other nearby roadways (County Roads 7 and 9 1/2, Mead Street and the I -25 Frontage Road) are also two-lane routes. Nearby traffic controls consist of north and southfacing Stop signs along SH 66. At the present time, there are no plans for upgrading any of the nearby roadway system. Figure 1 also presents a summary of existing commuter peak-hour traffic activity at the SH 66 intersections with the 125 ramps and at the east side Frontage Road. These counts were conducted by Leigh, Scott & Cleary, Inc. on Tuesday, June 20, 1989. The peak hours were determined to be 7:00 to 8:00 A.M. and between 4 :00 and 5:00 P.M. These data were extrapolated in order to derive some of the average weekday count estimates also shown on Figure 1 . As noted, the I-25 average daily counts were obtained from the Colorado 1Jivision of Highways. ra nsponation Systems•Transit•Perking•Vehicular Access•Pedestrian&Bicycle Planning• bull is Operations&Salelc•Signal Design•Traffic Impact Studies 900085 Mr. James E. Rees Page 2 July 20, 1989 In general , land uses in the vicinity are agricultural except for a small amount of retail and industrial development east of Mead Street. A single family home exists along the north side of SH 66 west of I-25 and some commercial zoning (C-3 and C-4) exists southeast of the I-25 interchange. Estimated Traffic Generation Table 1 , enclosed, presents estimates of average weekday and peak-hour traffic to be generated by the proposed development . These estimates are based on current applicable generation rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers. It is also assumed that about 10 percent of the industrial traffic will be internal to the project - either to and from other on-site industrial uses or to/from the project's commercial development. As shown on Table 1 , a total of 14 ,260 average weekday vehicle trips ('7, 130 entering and 7, 130 exiting) are projected to be generated. Of these, 525 will enter and 205 will exit during the morning peak hour, whereas the evening peak hour will consist of 605 entering and 810 exiting vehicles . It is important to recognize that all of this traffic will not be new to the area. At least 50 _percent of the highway commercial traffic is expected to be derived from motorists who would otherwise pass by the site on their way to other primary destinations (work, recreation, etc. ) . Proposed Access Plan The development 's site plan proposes two access points along SH 66 which would be located about 450 feet and 1 , 220 feet east of the site's west property line. An initial review of this plan by the Colorado Division of Highways (CDOH) concludes that this plan is contrary to recommendations set forth in the State Highway Access Code. CDOH staff has recommended that a signal progression analysis be performed for SH 66 between CR 7 and CR 9 1/2 assuming alternative access point locations . Figure 2 illustrates the following four alternative access locations: 1 . At the site 's west property line location one-half mile east of CR 7. This location, which presumably would be shared with development within adjacent areas, is consistent with recommendations in the Access Code. 2 and 3. These two locations are those indicated on the subject. development 's site plan . 4 . This location a quarter mile east of the site ' s west property line and is at the approximate mid point between 1-25 and the one-half mile point (Alternate 1 ) . 900085 Mr. James E. Rees Page 3 July 20, 1989 Combinations of these alternative access points have been analyzed using the SIGPROG (SIGnal PROGression) _computer program adapted for -micro-computer use by CDOH in the early 1980's. These analyses have assumed a 45 mph speed on SH 66, a 60/40 signal phasing split , and that the Frontage Road intersection will remain unsignalized or te relocated to coincide with Mead. The analysis results (copies enclosed) are summarized as follows: 90" Cycle Alternative Assumed Signal Locations Efficiency CR 7, Ramps, Mead & CR 9 1/2 34.2% 2 CR 7, Loc. 1 , Ramps , Mead & -CR 9 1/2 34.2% 3 CR 7, Loc. 4, Ramps , Mead & -CR 9 1/2 31 .8% 4 CR 7, Loc. 1 & 4, Ramps, Mead & CR 9 1/2 31 .8% 5 -CR 7, Loc. 2, Ramps , Mead & CR 9 1/2 34.2% 6 CR 7, Loc. 3, Ramps , Mead & CR 9 1/2 31 .3% 7 CR 'T, Loc. 2 & 3, Ramps, Mead & CR 9 1/2 31 .3% It is apparent that locations 3 and 4 reduce the potential signal progression efficiency (ratio of bandwidth to cycle length) by 2.4 and 2.9 percent, respectively. In addition, the location of a west access is not critical to potential signal progression. It is therefore recommended that full access be planned at the western end of the site with a specific location to be negotiated with CDOH. An eastern access point will be required to safely accommodate the level of project-generated traffic which is expected to be oriented to and from the east (refer to next report section) . This second access point should be designed to prohibit exiting left turns, however, which ;will obviate the need for any future signalization. Estimated Traffic Distribution and Assignment Figure 3 illustrates the anticipated distribution of site-generated traffic. These estimates are based on the relative amount of traffic activity found on the surrounding roadways today (see Figure 1 ) . The average weekday traffic estimates shown on Figure 1 have been adjusted to reflect the previously discussed commercial pass by traffic factor. Figure 4 illustrates the assignment of peak-hour traffic to the project's two recommended SH 66 access points and to the nearby 125 interchange and Frontage Road. 200085 Mr. _James E. Rees Page 4 July 20, 1989 Recommendations Rased on analysis of traffic projections shown on Figure 4 and on application of the State Highway Access Code, the following recommendations are made concerning access to and from the proposed I-25/SH 66 P.U.D. project . 1 . As previously discussed, one signalized full access point and one unsignalized three-quarter access point should he provided along SH 66 to serve the project at full buildout. The secondary eastern access will significantly benefit traffic safety and operations along SH 66 without deteriorating potential signal progression. 2. Construct a continuous 12—foot-wide acceleration/deceleration lane along the south side of SH 66 between the 1-25 southbound ramp intersection and 375 feet west of the project's west access point. The entrance taper into this lane should be designed at a ratio of 15 to 1 . 3. Construct a continuous 16-foot-wide left--turn lane median (painted) between the project's west access point and 775 feet east of the east access point. The redirect taper at the termini.i of this median should be designed at a ratio of 40 to 1 . 4. The project's west access point should be designed with two exit lanes in order to segregate left-and right-turn exiting traffic. 5. The project's east access point should be designed with a raised island which lnhibits exiting left turns onto SH 66. In addition, "No Left Turn" signs should be posted at the Stop-sign controlled exit. If the proposed project is developed in two or more interim stages , implementation of the recommended SH 66 auxiliary turn lanes may be phased to coincide with the cululative impact of partial project development . Based on Access Code Requirements, the following threshold values are applicable: 900085 Mr. James E. Rees Page 5 July 20, 1989 Lane Required if Turns Exceed the following Lane Type Values Eastbound Right -Turn 5 or more Entering -right. Deceleration Lane right turns Eastbound right-turn 15 or more exiting right acceleration lane* turns Westbound left-turn 12 or more entering left deceleration lane turns *If the posted speed limit along SH 66 is reduced to 35 mph or less, right- turn acceleration lanes will not be required. We trust that this report will assist with further planning for the I 25/SH 66 P.H.D. project. Please call if we can be of additional assistance . Respectfully submitted, LEIGH, SCOTT & CLEARY, INC. / ` Hy /�-' Lc& Philip N. Scot . III , P.E. PNS/mlc Enclosures: Table I Figures 1 Through 4 SIGPROG Printouts (7 sets ) — Traffic Counts c: Gerry McRae SC0085 J_ I 4 . r I C O L7 IC) ' a T I = C N C 0 ' C In N I C a a Y > -t 4' CV a rC � C II 0 L: N CC I 0 I L 0.) (C e O ❑0 ❑ I C = C O 10 I LO CU ^ = C ., C I C Cf C Y_ N O C Iin LO = 13 L G. I r .- N ._ a I N CC , C) N m• . 0 a y > I CO 'D 4. -C C CC — CC N 'J. > a, z d 3 F Y — C 1 C CO--1 CU C-4.. O C o y• O C ea C) 0 .. C) LE , N a x F c m z 0 4 ea = 0r) 0 F C D J 'ICIX 'C O Cam. L; LC O Y Z > C v) C C. LC 0 (c0 o) F '. 0 • y '. G a) Cal-Cr-, y 4 C 0:414 CO CS O Q C -CO O M — Qaec z s o s — F F -(1: C C Z O c7 '. TO C A[: f a) v L. L N. F . — G Q C CL r )n <0 2 a) C ri c cn 0 E60 -E O C: Ca C0'O W C `, 4 Y a.. Co '. > m Q 3 E- . C C 0 T Q co m m E Q. ..+ :.., CU C J .ti C .. 4 U) L. C C O F 0 0 Q 'C Q C SJ C) CC C Cr CC I _ L .0 V) C C — O 0 - /) . 4 O -0., I F CC :.J 4 _ .C ,r E _ C C C :.C F ' F, y C r Cl C F C a m 1 C C - F --- S 0 - 0 Z 900085 I ._ ... t IN 1"� \ Z/I. tto � of 1 o 0 0 -__- off. N O 10 I Z t. (� • �I' \ 0 1 I CT* ImIN '1S pu0 /� � I L� I°_! 'IN -In� info, o IN I _I^ v 0 0 � ^ iN N •Pl! •C•luolj y 0 I 0 ' • • o in I • O o 0 N I N ♦ O -n I�� Iml- 0) u� .I� L- I D � I / I a -IN , I oo / :In � r s I L. / • O , u c mlz II 0 I / co ♦ • o C a 1- Y T + m m 0 V m u ; o m m m m o 0 Oa U I- t m m > 0 O p Oct S I 0 m o u Y Y = �' m m ..• C a o_ £ m 0) ID -� a a y o < o_ w - J ++ CO I I II II u CI^ ii II 0 46 m 7 o e o W to o y -I < 01 u J 900085 Zile HO -o 0 0 _ o N Z�_ (� ■ GO I • 'iS peeyy 0 0 n CO 'PH -■iu0Jd SZ-I f � I p I • m m I o N • D 4 , 7uiod piW _ 4 T v co • eoueJiu3 lse3 - E D � a U • a n • -o_ I CL -eouOJiu3 iseM - O I eui1 I(liedoi e ' d 7aeM - U) QD U U c V +• 0 O _Y 2 C �� V 0 (1) V O � a v a u. d 900085 Zit 6 Ho 0 e o =_ Z co 1 '19Deert belm m *Io m 1RIo ._PH eDeluolj f ► aZ-I 2 I a p d . I -o ._. I N co I co 0 -- n 0 I O °'a I D I � / Cl.) • C IiO of 4. -- ' >, n .I2 AD CO 0 +• • cn o m O co = m O — C0U_ co o m m = e e o r 0 CU II o L N beIp- o L Ho Z 4— >I_ .0 m �n o r z Of ; J W J ___ 900085 r N Scale: 1" = 5D0' 241 2,5 278 248 241 / 278 ~-2.2 268 84 i 279 309 332 aa IN agar• a aar_ al ar_ a aaaaIII t. MIS IN a 24 -� 91 ' 103 - 221 LT-4' � 372 �� BB .05 - 255 I 2,' ; e� �2 21 ' r5 3. 373 1� Proposed I I-25/SH 66 P.U.D. 11/4 Li 2 5 Project II 15 II 1 57" 37 2 ! 2 42 8 5 11 ' 9 al eft% ateir I_ IOt0 I c av 10 o' N' t Figure 4 amp se I. Estimated Traffic Assignment I-25/SH 6$ P.U.D. LEGEND: 16 AM Peak-Hour Traffic 65 - PM Peak-Hour Traffic _L 900055 Leigh, Scott & Cleary, Inc. J r-- E m!' • . : !� �4L'N., _ ! i F.:� _ 7,-LA :N[ 3 w| _ra r-1:.Kz_ � _ �. ■mot<-c- C2a�r INEi — F= _ - - = COUNTERS NAME: EM COUNT DAY: 7�35AY . CgeNTER NO, 0 COUNT DATE: 6,202E: RE. NORTHBOUND 5O21HBOUND EA-T-OUND WEET-BOUND , END LT THRU RT LT 7HRU RT LT T�= .HRU4[ ____ THRO FT LT THRU RT TOTAL 7. 15 1& 0 24 A \: s0 IS 0 � / 0 `1 -El 0 0 ', - 155 ' 2 40 0 0 42 8 165 7: 45 • 20 O 20 0 0 0 1f 28 0 0 -oz 4 154 8: 00 l6 0 21 0 0 0 I9 I2 0 O 29 6 174 8: 15 12 0 11 0 o n la 13 O 0 '9 9 9'. 8: 30 12 0 8 0 0 0 11 0 A 8: 45 9 0 12 0 0 (. 16 27 - 2 6 S 9! � 0 0 2 a9 i 0 9= 00 12 A -c?: 15 - 0 0 12 20 0 0 \e e _ ee . 9: 30 9: 45 10: 00 10: I5 10: 30 10: 43 11 : 00 1l : IS 1l : 30 11 : 45 12:00 12: 15 12: 30 12: 45 13:00 13: 15 13: 30 13:45 14: 00 14: 15 14: 30 14: 45 12: 00 is: I5 l5: IO 1E: 45 1=: 00 16: 15 77 2 26 0 0 0 21 44 0 81 217 16: 30 45 0 15 0 0 0 14 41 0 0 B0 66 201 1a: 45 37 2 22 0 0 0 24 66 0 0 17: 00 55 6 212 26 0 15 0 0 0 15 40 0 0 57 2 165 17: 15 22 0 '0 A , 0 l6 S0 0 0 -62 7, 177 17: 70 :5 0 16 0 0 0 it 76 0 A - S2 6 200 17: 45 37 0 9 0 0 0 27 41. 0 A 1B: 00 29 0 ii 0 0 - 56 4 1 g la s20 0 Si 165 5 TOTAL 390 4 29E / ��/ �� 9 z22 t52 0 0 289 R6 249= . 900085 E C!iQ = '- .� : , := 77-__I 9g zPa , [�: y .�.|�i - �-- ,�r!. - 4-1- 4_ • . p` =i 1- r---= . CO@HTERS NAME: ' - [OUMI DAY. TUE=5Av , cow 7Em NO. 0 acuNT DATE: =2 : 3= a6. NORTHBOUN2 5CUTH�UND E-sTr m E 22D W T§ou END LT 1HRe RT LT THRU FT L\ THEL RT LT THRS ='-rTOTAL -- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- -- , 1 0 2 - 2 - _ T2 2� i 125 7: 70 0 0 0 , s — • . 0 -� -: 45 0 _ _ 1 1 / }\ 1 4 8 1 170 8: 00 O - 3 0 6e O 125 3: 15 0 \ \ 1 ' 1 2 4-5 0 111 ' `8: 70 O 6 5 0 0 4 A 1 I6 0 74 8: 45 _ A • 0 2 27 94 R: 00 1 / / \ - - �} 2 1 25 z B4 0 G -7A 1 76?: IS 3 © : 2� _ _ 9: 30 9: 45 10:00 ' 0: 19 _ 10: 30 10: 45 11 : 00 11 : !2 11 : 30 11 : 45 12: 00 12: 15 12: 30 12: 4S 13:00 13: !5 17: -0 13: 45 14:00 14: 15 1§: 30 1#: #5 I5:00 15: 15 15: 45 16: 00 16:15 6 6 : 69 0 80 1 16:20 s 1 4 _{ \ ' 168 16: 4-5 1 4 l4 1 0 z -67 2 0 78 # 162 l� : 05 5 «7 - - 55 2 !69 \: 15 \ / / -4 1 } \ 54 55 0 12! 17:20 1 1 4 _ \ / \/ 1 1 65 2 15S 17:45 1 - . O 5 5 4 162 l2: 0> 0 _ / \ \ - I 4- 1 1 57 = 122 ---- 0 ` \ __62 - 0 54 0 !20 TOTAL !6 4g 5: \\ 1 : _- �A( - ---- ---- � � �� - - _4 !7 e2z _- S)11 900085 r—.I 4!e7,— : ww =; r=-Z.:-- Tm2 F:is,rI NIES !;ID\,E!' E N P; ;NI-T- H— PI I — ' =S� �UNTERE NAME: ET COUNTER NO. ( COL! DAY: TUESDAY COUNT DATE: \z20 'EC PE NORTHBOUND gfUTHSOUND EA TBOUND WESTBOUND END- -\I_ THRU _/�_ \/_ THRU FT LT THRU RT LT THRU RT TOTAL 7: 15 0 0 0 17 n A -0 16 30 A 7:70 0 0 0 9 \ }\ 0 \0 4 -4 0 169 7 , 7: 45 0 0 0 10 Z 0 0 42 2\ 57 0 191 9: 00 0 O 0 1 .- 1 12 0 40 7L 0 1'16 2: 15 0 0 0 7 0 15 0 , 12 29 0 ' 123 B: 30 0 0 0 2 0 6 0 37 76 9 29 0 120 9: 45 0 0 0 10 0 12 0 29 20 1^ 30 0 ! l2 9-00 0 0 0 2 0 240 9: 1G -� 0 17 10 31 0 102 9:g0 9: 45 10:00 10: 15 10: 20 10: 42 11: 00 11 : !3 . l: 30 11 : 45 12: 00 12: 15 12:30 12: 45 13: 00 1-: 1' 13:20 13: 45 14:00 14: 15 14: 30 14: 45 1': 00 13: I3 15: 70 15: 45 16= 00 16: 15 0 0 0 10 2 29 0 41 -24 29 79 0 224 16: 70 0 0 0 B 0 16 0 24 21 39 E6 0 204 16: 45 0 0 0 . 0 12 0 22 26 66 0 '07 17:00 0 q � A 16 0 79 17 _( 73 O 169 17: 15 0 0 0 11 _ 25 0 46 21 03 A 186 17: 30 0 0 0 10 0 27 0 55 \6 65 0 215 ' 7: 45 0 0 0 7 1 /0 0 -4 -4 \\ 20 O 1 99 .E:00 0 0 0 . O 1 8 0 al !s a s 0 169 �� TOTAL 0 _ 0 120 4 _22 : ==O 465 e_ , 046 . :700 9C0185 O 85 Leiygt , Scott Sc -Cleary, Irn-c _ SISPFtOt3 TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYSTEM TIMING PLANS SH66 ALT1 PLAN 91 ( 50- 150) CYCLE LENGTH (SECONDS) 91 90 85 95 **************** E-BOUND DIRECTION * BAND WIDTH (SECONDS) 31. 1 30.-8 29.1 32.5 * LISTING IS * EFFICIENCY (PER CENT) 34.2 34.2 34.2 34.2 * IN E-BOUND * * DIRECTION * W-BOUND DIRECTION * * BAND WIDT-H (SECONDS) 131 . 1 30. 8 29. 1 32.5 **************** EFFICIENCY (PER CENT) 34.2 34.2 34 . 2_ 34.- SIGNAL OFFSETS PER CENT INTERVAL SIGNAL OPT. BEST --CT-HERS-- LOCATION BEG. MID. END G-PCT. -Y SPCNG. PROGRESSIVE SPEEDS-MPH ************ **************** ******** ****** ***************.y.****** CR7 68.2 100 31. 7 63.4 6.6 - P.BAND 86. 4 20. 6 E SOUND 4920 45 45.5 48.2 43. 1 P.BAND 79.4 13.6 W-BOUND 4920 45 45.5 _48.2 - 43.1 WEST RAMP 68.3 100 31 .7 63.4 6.b P.SIAND 68. 4 2.6 E-BOUND 600 45 45.5 48.2 43. 1 P.BAND 97. 4 31.6 W FOUND 600 45 45. 5 48.2 43. 1 EAST RAMP 68. 3 100 31 . 7 63. 4 -6.6 - -F .BAND 7-8. 3 12.5 E-BOUND 1150 45 45.5 48.2 43. 1 P. BAND 87. 5 21 . 7 W-BOUND 1150 45 45.5 48.2 43. 1 MEAD 68. 3 100 31 . 7 -63. 4 6. 6 F. BAND 97.5 31 . 7 E-BOUND 1250 -45 45. 5 48. 2 43. 1 F. BAND 68. 7 2.5 W-BOUND 1250 45 45. 5 48. 2 4.3.1 C7 11 /2 18. .3 Vii_' 8? . -. c-_. 4 6. b 18. .3 5C. : E-ISCLND._ _' m, 90-0 I !r I!"'!F~:Q'cC— TF:AFF'1r SIGNAL SY-STEM TIMING -FLANS EH6o ALT2 PLAN 01 ( 5 .',! CYC _Lr LENGTH !SECONDS) 91 90 E5 aC 4.**4**4-.. .. ;:.. -44.. * E-BOUND D? 'ECTID+h.I 4 * BAND WIDTH (SECONDS) ,, of . 1 .��.>. S �0. ! 32. 5 '! LISTING IS * EFFICIENCY cPER CENT) =4. 2 34.2 34.E * IN E-BOUND * 34•-? * DI-RECTION -If W-SOUND DIRECTION * * BAND WIDTH (BECONDr, 70. 8 31. 1 29. 1 �'- i **************4.*. EFFICIENCY (PER CENT) 34.2 34. 2 -4=4. 34. D SIGNAL OF- SETS--RE,; CENT INTERVAL SIGNAL OPT. BEST --OTHERS-- L OrATION BEG. MID. END G •CT. -Y SPCNG. PROGRESSIVE SPEEDS-MPH ********** * ***. *.*********** —******** ****** ac*** .*.4y►*.r.as.4.****z4*.**** CR7 68. ._ 100 -1.7 6-.4 6. 6 F .LAND 86. 4 20.16 E-FOUND 2640 F',.2-tFrr��i� �4 4 45 1�. ,� 48. ._. 43. t 13. 6 W-FOUND 2640 45 45. 5 -48. 2 -42.. 1 WEST PROF . 18. 7 50 81 . 7 67. 4 6. 6 F'. BAND 30.E E_ 22 64. 6 BOUND 80 45 4-5. 5 48. 2 47. 1 P.BAND 3$.-4 69. 6 W-BOUND 2280 45 45. 5 48. 2 47. 1 WEST RAMP 68. 3 100 X1. 7 63. 4 6.6 P.BAND 68. 4 2. 6 -E-BOUND 62n 71 . 6 W-BO.UND 60C 45 45. 5 48. 2 47. 1 EAS" F:AMF ,i-8. 100 - 71 . 7 6 .4 6. 6 F'. HAND 79.,3 12.5 E-BOUND 1150 45 5 2 • 4... � 48. � 4.=. I F ,BAND S7. 5 21 - D 1 .._ . . W-BDUP! Cr"�� 45 4'--. 5 4R. 2 47. 1 MEAD 6E.. - 1r_rr', _1 . ' 6_. 4 6. 6 i- .- - - _ _ 71 . - �-- r�LI:!E t`-+�- 4• 17 - 47 . - .1.' 77 . 9C0085 SInNAL OFFSETS-REF CENT INTERVAL -IG--c.•Ir=?L !7.C T. REST --DTNEF;E-- LOCATION EEG. MID. END G-FrT. -..- �FCNGG. PROGRESSIVE SFEEDE-MF *******..I s*. **4*********4144+ -****+*4* 4***4* *iF?I**.**4-* ***?F**44+f**4. CR ''1.`? 1E(.7 P .BAND 1n. _ 32. 5 E-FOUND . . AND 47. 3 al . - W--ECUND 9C0085 I__ i .. S t .t 17. .6_•._ C .1. . . ter-- I r- c — sIG ='F DcG TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYSTEM T I N'ING �L. M1L SH66 ALT: rLAN 85 ( 7.10— t50) CYCLE LENGTH (SECONDS 85 R5 80 90 *{'"'*`'*********• ** _E-BOUND D71ECTION * * BAND WIDTH (SECONDS) 27. 1 _ 28. 7 * LISTING LS * EFFICIENCY (PER CENT) 2''1.8 31.B 31.a :1 .8 * IN E-BOUND * * DIRECTION * W-BOUND DIRECTION * * BAND WIDTH -SE 27 27 -,5. 4 28. d ("SECONDS) _ ***********'i.**** EFFICIENCY (PER CENT) 71 .8 31.8 31 . 8 71. 8 SIGNAL OFF ETS-F'ER CENT INTERVAL SIGNAL OFT. 5=7. S-- LOCATION SEG. MID. TND 8-PCT.-'y, SPCNG. PROGRESSIVE --OTHE—MPH RS-- ********4-**rt **************** *****w**. *.d.**** ? ****4 ***-..***y 4-***** CR7 6+7. 5 100 '1 . 62. 9 7. 1 F'.BAND 99. 7 1 . C E-BOUND 7960 -45 45 47. 8 -42 . 5 F.-BAND 68. 5 . = W ROUND 7960 -45 45 47. 8 .42-, 5 MID POINT 68. 5 100 71 . 5 62. 9 -. 1 F . BAND 70. 2 2 E-BOUND 960 45 45 -47.8 42.5 F . BAND 9E 29. 2 W-BOUhtD 760 45 45 47. 8 42. 5 WEST RAMP 68. 5 100 31. 5 62. 9 7. 1 F'.ELAND 87. a 19. - ' E-BOUND A005 F'. LAND 8C;. 8 �, 45 :+,-• 47. B 41'-'.c 12.6 W-BOUND 600 45 45 47. 8 42. 5 EAST F:AMF' t8. 5 .100 `1. 5 2. 9 7. 1 F'. FANG 98 29. 8 E-OUND If':, 45 45 47. 8 5 UJ-BOUND 11 '0 45 45 47. 3 - __ 900085 SIGNAL OFFSET=- ER CENT INTERVAL SIGNAL _r,' --OTHERS-- LOCATION YD. ENI: �r� _� _ SEG. MID. _ OFT. BEST u-. _ ='CNG. PROGRESSIVE SPEEDS-MPH +F+F 4'4'x-i.-I. F .►rr.f4.'�iL .. . ,F� '4 •'f Y*iR al. �iy►.►.i�4-'h+++Fi#444?►.r.y�.i-)}.ii�i y_F 7.1/2 50 R1 . F. .rAr.fD 40. 3 3 726 R-Rm.ND • • 900085 -- C1 n-- ,." „„ I r-3 c - I Cr F'tom: G TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYSTEM TIMING PLANS ALT4 F'L-AN SS ( 50- 5<:0 C.Yr;.,,E LE:•iGT:-± ..E C:7i1rDS i 8ff 25 2�i 00 ****+**.....y...*..;t.}** E-POUND DIRECTION * * BAND W_IDT (sEcLwDS) 27. 1 25. 5 * LISTING IS 4 EFFICIENCY t°F'EF' CENT) -71 . 8 71 . 8 71 . 8 71 . 2 * IN E DUND * * DIRECTIS]N * W-BOUND DIRECTION * *. BAND W1DTL !SECONDS 27 25. 4 -6. - ******..****.*******..***.**+.k.** EFF IT'I ENC'Y t:PER: CENT) 71.8 71. 8 71 . 8 71 . 8 SIGNAL OFFSETS—PEE' CENT INTER:1 AL SIGNAL OFT. BEST --OTHERS-- LOCATION BEG. MID. END G—F CT.—y SPCNG. PROGRESSIVE SPEEDS—MPH ****au*****4-4- ************4&-4•** ******** *'***** ****y.*****************.t. CR7 62. 5 100 71 .5 62. 5 . . 1 P BAND 99. 7 11 . 5 _E POUND 2640 -45 45 4—. 2 42. 5 P.BAND -68.5 .7 W—BOUND 264!i 45 45 4-7. 8 42. 5 WEST PROP. 18. 5 50 91.5 62. 9 7. 1 P. BAND 46. 7 78. 5 E—BOUND 1320 45 45 47.$ 42._f P. BAND 21 .5 53.-7 W—ROUND 1720 45 45 47.-8 42. MIDPOINT 48.5 100 =r1 .5 62. 9 -. 1 P. BAND 70. 2 2 E-SCUMD SF.0 45 45 47. 8 42. 5 F.-BAND 98 2' . 9 WPCIUNn 960 45 -?5 4-7. 2 42. 5 WEST RAMP -68. 5 100 7;1 .5 62.9 -. 1 P. BAND 87. 4 19. 2 E—BOUND 600 45 4-5 4-7. 8 42. 5 P. BAND ,3—. 3 12. 6 W—BOUND 60c. 45 45 - EAST PAMF 62.-5 100 'a7.2.-= -.. - P . '1.-4 .-. Q '- - - - wc:.: - _ i. -!-_' __ _ 15 i'5 4..- - 11. - 9C0085 SIGNAL OF«- ETS-=Ep CENT INTERVAL SISNAL OFT. BEST --OTHERS-- LOCATION EEG. MID. END G-PCT. -✓ 2P_NG. PROGRESSIVE SPEEDS—MPH *+F*ac * 9F*aai}+.* f*-4d.* * +t**it*+E gra?ELF4* •sy+tfal 1EAD [,-;.m 7,J — r.3ANE 12. 5 70. 7 E--P lair, I.-,o 4E 47 47. P E31... 5 t"J_SOLMZ 1770 45 47.G 47. 5 1P, 5 !) 81. 7 6,.q — R. SAND AND 40. 6 7^. 4 P"—ROUND F . EAND 7_7. 4 59. W—EOU! ' 900085 L... 3 c.7 i-t . s= -= t t :?. IC i —. r-I-,' ., z 1-b ,= _ s. I G F'. :IJi3 TFAFFIC S:GNAL SYST=:1 TTM_N:0 9I .C. 5H66 ALTS PLAN 91 ( 50- r01 C'/CLE L NGTH ,—SECOND-7.. 91 90 85 ,C ******* .*. *****' E-SOUND DIRECT_ON * * BAND WIDTH (EECCNDE) 71 .1 :0. 8 29. 1 72. 5 * LISTING IS * EFFICIENCY (PEF :ENT) 34.2 34.2 34. '2 74.2 * 1N E BOUND * * DIRECTION * W 2+OUND D I-RECT I ON * * BAND WIDTI (SE ':,D : 31 . 1 70. 2 29. 1 - **•x-************* EFFICIENT,• (PER ENT) 34. 2 74. : 74. 2 34 . SIGNAL OFFSETS-F'ER TENT I l i T ER:1:AAL SIGNAL OPT. BEST --OTHERS-- LOCATION BEG. MID. END G-FCT. -Y SRCNG. PROGRESSIVE SPEEDS—MPH ************ **************** ******..* ****** ********************** CR7 L � 65. .= 100 =1.7 63. 4 6. 6 . ELAND 90. 4 20.6 E—BOUND .10900 45 45. 5 48.2 -43. 1 F'. BAND 79. 4 13.6 W BOUND 3090 A5 45. 5 48.2 43. 1 WEST ENT ?8. 3 50 81 . 7 63. 4 6. 6 P . FIFINi 37. 9 72. 1 183 E—BOUND .1 inm 1 a 45 4C. 5 48.2 4. .. F'. BAND 27. 9 62. 1 W—BOUND 183 1J 45 45.5 48. 2 4.3. 1 WEST RAMP 62. 7 100 71 .7 83. 4 8. 8 F'.BAND 68. 4 -7. O P.-BOUND 600 45 45. 5 48. 2 47. 1 P.ELAND 97. 4 :1 ..á W-BOON 600 45 45.5 46. 2 47. 1 EAST RAMP -68. 7 100 :1. 7 63. 4 m. 6 F'. ELAND 78. 7 1'. ' E-BOLNt 1150 45 4'. 5 48. 2 47. 1 F . BAND 57. E 21 . 7 W-+.0-12D,D. 1 150 4' 4". '- 4.8. 2 47. 1 mc,In 1, .:, . .:• • :... '- .._._ ' :i'^ . . ..: ,.i. _ -.. 900085 SIGNAL OFFSETS-PER CENT INTERVAL ;ISNAL OPT. BEST --OTHERS-- LOCATION BEG. MID. END G-PC_T. -Y 3F'CNG. PROGRESSIVE SPEEDS—MFH rF: 71. 2 _S. _ 50 S1. - c37. a F'.BY!iD 19. 7 32, 5 .. SAND 47. T 21 . 7 W—BCUmD 900085 L_. • i c: a-m ,. v_ Q t -t c 1 ... . 1--�.,' , I i-I c _ 'S I F"IF:QG TRAFFIC SIGNAL _YST-C1 T: "::iG CLANS SH56 ALT-. F'L AN 89 t 50— SC') CYCLE LENGTH 4- E2DNtS: 89 Q0 25 95 *,w****y.*******.e* E—BOUND DIRECTION * * BAND W I D>T!.: (SECONDS) 27. 9 28.2 26.6 29. 7 * LISTING IS * EFFICIENCY (PER CENT) 71. 3 31 .3 =1.3 31 . 3 * IN E-BOUND * DIRECTION * W-BDUND DIRE`:.TLON * * BAND WIDTH (SECONDS) 27. 9 29. 2 26.6*********.***444.** EFFICIENCY y'PER CENT) 31 . _ ..;i. _ ,1. _ 71 .7 SIGNAL OFFSETS-PER CENT INTERVAL 2:2NAL OFT. BEST --IOTHEF:S-- LOCATION BEG. MID. END G-PCT. -Y SFCNG. F'ROGF:ESEIVE SPEEDS-Mc-14 ****4*-**.**. ..t ***40.**-********** ****J•�--. -.I-4,-,4-*-. . }.aagF ****-e-+tta **A.***jr?. CR7 68. 4 100 .31.6 62. 7. _-_•. 7 F'. LAND 84. o 15. 9 E-BOUND 3860 45 44. 5 47. 1 42. 2 F'. BAND 84. 1 1.5.. 4 W-BOUND 3860 45 44. 5 47. 1 42. 2 EAST ENT 18. 4 50 81.-6 67. 7 6. 7 F . BAND 5k_ . 7 81. 6 E-BOUND 106i' 45 44. 5 47. 1 42. 2 F'. BAND 18. 4 49. 7 W-BOUND 1060 45 44. 5 47. 1 42. 2 WEST RAMP S'. :.. 110- 71 . 6 62. 7 6. F'.BAND 6E. 4 9c'. 7 E-BOLI^ r' fl,'0 45 44.5 47. 1 42. 2 P. BAND . 3 21 . 6 W-POUND 600 45 44.5 47. 1 42. 2 EAST RAMP b2. 4 tO 31 . 6 63. - . ? F' BAND 72. 6 9.9 E-BOU UNn _i 0 45 44. 5 47. 1 42 P..BAND 9Q. 1 21 . 4 W-EOLi‘:C. 1150 45 44 . .j 42. 2 _ :__ _ 2= 4'_ _ - .. . __-. - 900085 SIGNAL ❑F-EETS-PER CENT INTERVAL SIGNAL OPT. PEST --OTHERS-- LOCATION EES. MID. END G-PCT. OF_NG. PROGRESSIVE SPEEDS-MPH ************ 4-** ►r.+4********+ *-►**4.** F **4►* ****4.***4+r44***il4***** CR 91/2 18. 4 54 81. 6 6717...7 6.7 r'. SAND 1 . 4 5�►. 7 E-BOUND F . uHND 449. 80. 6 W-POUND • • • 9C0085 L-,3. In , 'Scott u C3 r--hr- , Iric S. I 0 IF'RzCD IM TRAFFIC SIGNAL SvETEP TIMING a! ANS SH66 ALT7 FLAN £9 ',0- 50) CYCLE LENGTH t SECCND5; .89 90 85 c� *****"********** E-BOUND DIRECTION * * BAND WIDTH (SECONDS) 27. 9 28. 2 26. a ?0. 7 * LISTING IS * EFFICIENCY (PER CENT) 31. 3 - * IN E-BOUND * ;1• 31 . 3 1 .= * DIRECTION * W-SOUND DIRECTION * * BAND WIDTH (SEC c , *****. CND_. 27. 9 28.2 26. 6 29. ***** ***** EFFICIENCY (PER CENT) 71. 7 '1, 7 31 ... 31 . 7 SIGNALOFFSETS-PER CENT INTERVAL SIGNAL OPT. BEET --OTHERS-- LOCATION GEG. MID. END 8-PCT. -Y SPCNG. PROGRESSIVE SPEEDS-MPH ************ **************** ******** ****** ***'N'*'fF**1F********1E•**'if* CR7 68.4 100 31.6 63.7 6. 7 P.BAND 84. 6 15. 9 E-BOUND 7090 45 44. 5 47. 1 42. 2 P.BAND 84. 1 15. 4 W=BOUND 3090 45 44.5 47. 1 42. 2 WEST ENT 18. 4 50 81 .6 63. 3 6. 7 P. BAND 37. 2 68.5 E-BOUND 770 45 44. 5 47. 1 42.2 P. BAND 71 . 5 62. 8 W-BOUND 770 45 44.5 47. 1 42.2 EAST ENT 18. 4 50 81 . 6 067. 7 6. 7 F . BAND 50. 7 81. 6 E-BOUND 1060 45 44. 5 47. 1 42. 2 P. BAND 18. 4 49. 7 W-BOUND 1060 45 44. 5 47. 1 42. 2 WEST F:AMF 68. 4 100 71. 6 67. 7 T 6. 7 P. BAND 68. 4 9q.7 E-90i!Nn 0,r, C F. BAhlr, b- - `�� 44. .., 47. 1 42.2 _ 31 . 6 W-SO iND 600 4•�5 44. 5 47. .L 42. 2 r,-.77 F((t•1P 7. i. 1 - I� __4r y - __ T 910085 SIGNAL OFFSETS-PEP CENT INTERVAL SIGNAL OPT. BEST --OTHER-- LflCATION BEG. MID. END G-F'CT. -'� C r'F,Ec r E S aF+F•+F*•e-«+b.wf},�4, 5F•_.IC PRC�� S.V� SPEEDS-MPH 4***4.4.4*.**.H*** 4—**.*4-0.+.* -**.'-.* 4 ...4-4 ,4 MEAD _08. 4 1')0 67. 7 6. T - - '1 . 6 F', BAND 99. ' 29 w E-BOUNE• Cam_ 42.2 . 6 AND 70.5_ 1. 8 14-BOUND 1^5() 5 44.5 47. 1• 1 42. 2 CR L. ' 18. 4 50 81 . 6 6-=. 6- F'. BAND 19. 4 50. 7 E--BOUND P.BAND 49. 7 80. 6 W-BOUND 900085 EXHIBIT "E" 900085 SOIL SURVEY OF wJELD COUNTY, COLORAuO, SOUTHERN PART United-Slates Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, in cooperation with the Colorado Agricultural Experiment Station `l �� ez r,l. aid rii� Y'FEn if 139, 7k1 r• 1' J' _L1!! rliu �t��yrnet ..: l � 9 " 2r f i,� /82'W<' K , aY r tit { 4� 3 1 �, s( ! iclf 82 r �! ! Jf !c � 'y , t,r i,p ter ,,r��r �•4 , A , ab• 4 ez !6 T**, SANUORN . 1 F �' M 82 )op, 1 ., Iii a Si, �2 , itERVO/R " I. f ' :,p , Li- `�, A'y �; ,,,, `}? i I4 yd'.Jy��. ��,lr f • _Illy'I- ` i <fJl ' "\ tlif 1.h.T //p�y.. ii 1,; '` 1 lf rlr-,!�r'�i �,� ',,n4F 82 82 _ !illillitiniliNellig"StItt . . i -- ' C! r qq • w C. ••'ri t �R f,,,,.�l9vi '^T s•-'. 82 ii..3 n.., lc' .14..:� !c183 � kolke .•`* ! '>f elt.a 1ly� '. .,,i,.,''71`�1 �k•�JiP ) '�� ' . y� I 16 x f r 'a !/ ' ;rl k !°P �' I' 1 d"' 4fti vi us E 3/4• ;IMF ` 1e ` ," }. ftIt ]I r rlf i r ' ..,,, „ ,8 Ali.3/4A tell r P 10.11'A '' ,44r, 'i. { g1�'`}'rr `{ i ' J , - ti ♦>� r...il' - � v ,t. 1° .,.r ,r 1 1'e ,:•itilw1Ir ' .r. rJ . �p '� ` I:J''lr®o'S r e(r'''+ `J r i l i1 04 ;'1 fir r s , e.j5 ,is A•-... s , t r tt� a i? . t� 4=Aquolle -and Aquepta, flooded. This nearly level map unit is in depressions in smooth plains and along the bottoms of natural drainageways throughout the survey area. Aquolls, which have a dark colored surface layer, make up about 55 percent of the unit. Aquepts, which have a lighter colored surface layer, make up about 25 percent. About 20 percent is soils that are well drained and soils that have sandstone or shale within 48 inches of the surface. These are deep, poorly drained soils that formed in recent alluvium. No one pedon is typical. Commonly the soils have a mottled, mildly to moderately alkaline loamy or clayey surface layer and underlying material that ex- tends to a depth of 60 inches or more. In places they have aaleyed layer in the underlying material. Most of the acreage is subject to excessive runoff. The water table is at or near the surface in spring and during the peak of the irrigation season. These soils are used for rangeland and-wildlife habitat. Some small areas are irrigated pasture. The potential native vegetation is nominated by switchgrass, prairie cordgrass, saltgrass, alkali sacaton, big bluestem, indiangrass, western wheatgrass, slender wheatgrass, sedge, and rush. Cattails and bullrush grow in the swampy spots associated with these range sites. Iotential production ranges from 4,000 pounds per acre In favorable years to 3,000 pounds in unfavorable years. Ae range condition deteriorates, the tall and mid grasses decrease, production drops, and saltgrass, sedge, and rush increase. The farming and irrigation in adjacent areas has increased the amount of salts on much of the acreage. Management of vegetation on this soil should be based on taking half and leaving half of the total annual produc- tion. Switchgrass, big bluestem, indiangrass, western wheatgrass, pubescent wheatgrass, intermediate wheat- grass, tall wheatgrass, and tall fescue are suitable for seeding. The plants selected should met the seasonal requirements of livestock. For successful seeding, a firm prepared seedbed is needed. A grass drill should be used. Seeding early in spring has proven most successful. Til- lage is needed to eliminate the undesirable vegetation. Wetland wildlife, especially waterfowl, utilize this unit The wetland plants provide nesting and protective cover as well as some food. The nearby irrigated cropland, where wildlife obtain much of their food and find protec- tive cover, makes this unit valuable to both wetland and openland wildlife. Openland wildlife, especially pheasant, use this unit for cover and nesting. Deer find excellent cover in some areas. These valuable wildlife areas should be protected from fire and fenced to prevent encroachment and overuse by livestock. They should not be drained. Capa- bility subclass VIw; Aquolls in Salt Meadow range site, Aquepts in Wet Meadow range site. 9COVOs •42—Nunn clay loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes. This is a Wildlife is an important secondary use of this soil. The deep, well drained soil on terraces and smooth plains at cropland areas provide favorable habitat for ring-necked elevations of 4,560 to 5,1511 feet. It formed in mixed anti- pheasant and mourning dove. Many nongame species can vium and eolian deposits. Included in mapping are small, be attracted by establishing areas for nesting and escape long and narrow areas of sand and gravel deposits and cover. For pheasants, undisturbed nesting cover is essen- small areas of soils that are subject to occasional flooding. tial and should be included in plans for habitat develop- Some leveled areas are also included. ment, especially in areas of intensive agriculture. Range- Typically the surface layer of this Nunn soil is grayish land wildlife, for example, the pronghorn antelope, can be brown clay loam abbot 9 inches thick. The subsoil is light attracted by developing livestock watering facilities, brownish gray clay loani about 14 inches thick. The upper managing livestock grazing,and reseeding where needed. part of the substratum is light brownish gray clay loam. This soil has fair to poor potential for urban develop- The lower part to a depth of 60 inches is brown sandy meet. It has moderate to high shrink swell, low strength, Ioann' and moderately slow permeability. These features create Permeability is moderately slow. Available water problems in dwelling and road construction. Those areas capacity is high. The effective rooting depth is GO inches that have loam or sandy loam in the lower part of the or more. Surface runoff is medium, and the erosion substratum are suitable for septic tank absorption fields hazard is low. and foundations. Some areas of this soil are adjacent to In irrigated areas this soil is suited to all crops corn- streams and are subject to occasional flooding. The poten- monly grown in the area, including corn, sugar beets, tial is fair for such recreational development as camp and beans, alfalfa, small grain, potatoes, and onions. An exam- picnic areas and playgrounds. Capability subclass Ile ir- pie of a suitable cropping system is 3 to 4 years of alfalfa rigated, Ilk nonirrigated; Clayey Plains range site. followed by corn, corn for silage, sugar beets, small grain, 64—Thedalund loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes. This is a or beans. Generally such characteristics as the high clay moderately deep, well drained soil on plains at elevations content or the rapidly permeable substratum slightly of 4,900 to 5,250 feet. It formed in residuum from shale. restrict some crops. Included in mapping are small areas of soils that have All methods of irrigation are suitable, but furrow ir- shale and sandstone deeper than 40 inches. rigation is the most common. Proper irrigation water Typically the surface layer is brown loam about 8 management is essential. Barnyard manure and commer- inches thick. The underlying material is pale brown and dial fertilizer are needed for top yields. very pale brown loam. Shale is at a depth of about 28 In nonirrigated areas most of the acreage is in small inches. grain and it is summer (allowed in alternate years. Permeability and available water capacity are Winter wheat is the principal crop. The predicted average moderate. The effective rooting depth is 20 to 40 inches. yield is 33 bushels per acre. If the crop is winterkilled, Surface runoff is medium, and the erosion hazard is low. spring wheat can be seeded. Generally precipitation is too This soil is suited to limited cropping. A suitable low for beneficial use of fertilizer. cropping system is 3 to 4 years of alfalfa followed by 2 Stubble mulch farming, striperopping, and minimum til- years of corn and small grain and alfalfa seeded with a lage are needed to control soil blowing and water erosion. nurse crop. Incorporating plant residue and manure im- The potential native vegetation is dominated by proves tilth and provides organic matter and plant western wheatgrass and blue grama. Buffalograss is also nutrients. present. Potential production ranges from 1,000 pounds Most irrigation methods are suitable, but the length of per acre in favorable years to GOO pounds in unfavorable runs should be short to prevent overirrigation. Light, years. As range condition deteriorates, a blue grama-buf- frequent irrigations are best. Sprinkler irrigation is falograss sod forms. Undesirable weeds and annuals in- desirable. Commercial fertilizers increase yields and add vale the site as range condition becomes poorer. to the value of the forage produced. Management of vegetation of this soil should he based In nonirrigated areas this soil is suited to winter wheat, on taking half and leaving half of the total annual produc- barley, and sorghum. Most of the acreage is planted to tion. Range pitting can help in reducing runoff. Seeding is winter wheat. The predicted average yield is 25 bushels desirable if the range is in poor condition. Western per acre. The soil is summer fallowed in alternate years wheatgrass, blue grama, sideoats grama, buffalograss, pu- to allow moisture accumulation. Generally precipitation is bescent wheatgrass, and crested wheatgrass are suitable too low for beneficial use of fertilizer. for seeding. The grass selected should meet the seasonal Stubble mulch farming, striperopping, and minimum til- requirements of livestock. It can_be seeded into a clean, Inge are needed to control soil blowing and water erosion. firm sorghum stubble, or it can be drilled into a firm Terracing also may be needed to control water erosion. prepared seedbed. Seeding early in spring has proven The potential native vegetation is dominated by blue most successful. grama. Several mid grasses, such as western wheatgrass Windbreaks and environmental plantings are generally and needleandthread, are also present. Potential produc- well suited to this soil. Cultivation to control competing tion ranges from 1,600 pounds per acre in favorable years vegetation should he continued for as many years as to 1,000 pounds in unfavorable years. As range condition possible following planting. Trees that are best suited and deteriorates, the mid grasses decrease; blue grama, buf- have good survival are Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern falograss, snakeweed, yucca, and fringed sage increase; redcedar, ponderosa pine, Siberian elm, Russian-olive, and and forage d production drops. Undesirable weeds and o an- hackborry. The shrubs best suited are skunkbush sumac,American plum. nuals invade the site as range condition becomes poorer.lilac, Siberian peashrub, arid 960085 Management of vegetation on this soil should be based All methods of irrigation are suitable, but furrow ir- on taking half and leaving half of the total annual produc- rigation is the most common. Barnyard manure and corn- Lion. Seeding is desirable if the range is in poor condition. mercial fertilizer are needed for top yields. Irleoats grams, little bluestem, western wheatgrass, blue In nonirrigated areas these soils are suited to winter grams, pubescent wheatgrass, and crested wheatgrass are wheat, barley, and sorghum. Most of the acreage is suitable for seeding. The grass selected should meet the planted to winter wheat. The predicted average yield is seasonal requirements of livestock. It can be seeded into 28 bushels per acre. The soil is summer fallowed in al- a clean, firm sorghum stubble, or it can be drilled into a ternate years to allow moisture accumulation. Generally firm prepared seedbed. Seeding early in spring has precipitation is too low for beneficial use of fertilizer. proven most successful. Stubble mulch farming, Windbreaks and environmental plantings are -strip l soil bropping, ndd mieimrm on. not suited to this soil. Onsite investigation is needed generally to Terracing are g also may be needed tolcont of water owing and erosior rrneion. Terracin determine if plantings are feasible. The potential native vegetation is dominated by blue Rangeland wildlife, such as antelope, cottontail, and grama. Several mid grasses such as western wheatgrass coyote, are best suited to this soil. Because forage prmluc- and needleandthread are also present. Potential produc- tion is typically low, grazing management is needed if tion ranges from 1,600 pounds per acre in favorable years livestock and wildlife share the range. Livestock watering to 1,000 pounds in unfavorable years. As range condition facilities also are utilized by various wildlife species. The deteriorates, the mid grasses decrease; blue grama, buf- cropland areas provide favorable habitat for pheasant and falograss snakeweed, yucca and fringed sage increase; and forage production drops. Undesirable weeds and an- mourning dove. Many nongame species can be attracted by establishing areas for nesting and escape cover. nuals invade the site as range condition becomes poorer. • The underlying shale is the most limiting feature of Management of vegetation on this soil should be based this soil. Neither septic tank absorption fields nor sewage on taking half and leaving half of the total annual produc- Lion. Seeding is desirable if the range is in poor condition. lagoons function properly. In places the underlying shale' has high shrink-swell potential. Environmental and beau- Sideoats grams little bluestem, western wheatgrass, blue • tification plantings of trees and shrubs can be difficult to , gram; pubescent wheatgrass, and crested wheatgrass are ' suitable for seeding. The grass selected should meet the establish. Capability subclass IVs irrigated; We nonir- seasonal requirements of' livestock. It can be seeded into rigated; Loamy Plains range site. a clean, firm sorghum stubble or it can be drilled into a 82—Wiley-Colby complex, 1 to 3 percent slopes. This nearly level map unit is on smooth plains in the western firm prepared seedbed. Seeding early in spring has rt of the survey area at elevations of 4,860 to 6,000 proven most successful. _,;et. The Wiley soil makes up about 60 percent of the Windbreaks and environmental plantings are generally well suited to these soils. Cultivation to control competing unit, and the Colby soil about 30 percent. About 10 per- cent is Helot silty clay and Weld loam. vegetation should be continued for as many years as The Wiley soil is deep and well drained. It formed in possible following planting. Trees that are best suited and calcareous eolian deposits. Typically the surface layer is have good survival are Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern pale brown silt loam about 11 inches thick. The subsoil is redcedar, ponderosa pine, Siberian elm, Russian-olive, and pale brown silty clay loam about 23 inches thick. The sub- hackberry. The shrubs best suited are skunkbush sumac, stratum to a depth of 60 inches is very pale brown silty lilac, Siberian peashrub, and American plum. clay loam. Openland wildlife, such as pheasant, mourning dove, and cottontail are best suited to these soils. Wildlife Permeability is moderately slow. Available water capacity is high. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches habitat development, including tree and shrub plantings or more. Surface runoff is medium, and the erosion and grass plantings to serve as nesting areas, should be hazard is moderate. successful without irrigation during most years. Under ir- The Colby soil also is deep and well drained and formed rigation, good wildlife habitat can be established, benefit- in calcareous eolian deposits. Typically the surface layer ing many kinds of openland wildlife. is pale brown loam about 7 inches thick. The underlying The Wiley soil has only fair potential for urban and material is very pale brown silt loam to a depth of 60 recreational development. Slow permeability, moderate inches. shrink-swell potential, and limited bearing capacity cause Permeability is moderate. Available water capacity is problems in dwelling and road construction. The Colby high. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. soil has good potential for urban and recreational develop- Surface runoff is medium, and the erosion hazard is ment. Road design can be modified to compensate for the moderate. limited capacity of this soil to support ability This map unit is used for irrigated and nonirrigated irrigated, IVe nonirrigated; Loamy oad. Plains g subclass Ile cropland and for rangeland, wildlife habitat, and urban range site. development. In irrigated areas these soils are suited to all crops cnnunonly grown in the area, including corn, sugar beets, ns, alfalfa, small grain, and onions. An example of a suitable cropping system is 3 to 4 years of alfalfa fol- lowed by corn, corn for silage, sugar beets, small grain, or beams. Land leveling, ditch lining, and installing pipelines may be needed for proper water applications. 900085 EXHIBIT "F" 900085 04 AMOCO Amoco Production Company Denver Region 1670 Broadway P.O. Box 800 Denver,Colorado 80201 303-830-4040 August 1, 1989 James E. Rees c/o 25-66 LTD Partnership P.O. Box 1764 Englewood, CO 80150-1764 Re: Amoco's Spacing Requirements for T3N-R68W, Section 27: NE/4 Dear Mr. Rees: Amoco will require an area 250' x 50' surrounding the location of its tank battery on this property. Amoco will also need to keep 15' on the lease road. If you have any questions or need further information, I can be reached at 830-4275. Sincerely, l / [ Natalie Udelhoven Law Clerk NU:lls 900085 Union Pacific Resources - Minerals June 30, 1989 Mr. Jim Rees P.O. Box 1764 Englewood, CO 80150 Dear Mr. Rees: Re: Long Term Non-Development /.ease, Portion of the NE1/4 of Section 27, Township 3 North, Range 68 West, Weld County, Colorado Pursuant to our phone conversation regarding the above-captioned Lease, please be advised that Union Pacific Resources Company ("UPRC") is willing to lease its reserved coal rights in and to approximately 113 acres in the NE1/4 of Section 27, Township 3 North, Range 68 West under the following terms and conditions: 1. The Lease will be for a term of 50 years. 2. Upon execution of the Lease, Lessee shall pay to UPRC, as consideration for said Lease, the sum of $50. 00 per acre for such lands included in the Lease. 3 . Lessee shall pay a production royalty to UPRC for all coal mined and removed from the leased premises in the amount of 12-1/2 percent of the average gross sales price f.o.b. cars at point of shipment. 4. Lessee agrees to indemnify and save harmless UPRC and its owners, affiliates, agents, employees and invitees against any and all loss, claims, demands, injury or death arising out of the existence of said Lease or Lessee's operations conducted on the leased premises. 5. Lessee shall operate and use the leased premises in accordance with the law and shall comply with all requirements of federal, state and local law applicable to the leased premises and the subject matter of said Lease. 900085 Union Pacific Resources Muv•lals 8774 Yates Drive, Suite 100 Westminster, CO 80030 303/650/200 Mr. Jim Rees June 30, 1989 Page 2 6. Lessee agrees to comply with all other terms and conditions of said Lease. It is my understanding that you have applied with Weld County for a zoning change from agricultural to a Commercial-Business PUD for said 113 -acres, and that upon zoning change approval, you will formally request in writing the above-captioned Lease. With your written request, please furnish me with a plat showing the exact location of said 113 acre parcel. We are willing to work with you on this matter. Should you have any questions concerning the Long Term Non-Development Lease, please call me at 650-7236. Very truly yours, 1/ mat " S. L. White Senior Staff Landman cc: G. H. Kuhnhausen E. L. Wagner 960085 EXHIBIT "G" 900085 II 17 II 16 13 .4 II- lt II Dam L I -------\I\ - -- -_-_-_=_7 OA 2O _21 __ -- 22 23 — LIBERTY pitch 7/ FOSt'er 5 . y_ ., �/' Ruaye °` + Business I - - e , _ . -4 t7r\ .'• Dr 5 27 4.,:eL , r 1 iii ti 28 in ?�� F° r0 r ?ONE C a r h'!, na fir y'ty ,,: i nSi it ;t a i{Y 9 Myi trlI NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE ►R0M►M I - Sanborn r 51.4.f i� :i "ity IIi Reservoir ►h,� A + +�,f / ll 22 j1 )y yy Y lYj�f y�'h rj il Dam 'r. .., • ra, FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP KiRKLAND I II I\\ kll / WELD \\ • COUNTY, II COLORADO Q U7NWCDRPORATSD AREA I r• 33 34 II PANEL 850 OF 1075 II 35 U!!YAP INDEX Pan PANEL.NOT PnINT101 I I' IN \ I I 1� pI 7-ri � J , � r y IL l i !� f f � . COMMUNITY-PANEL NUMBER xl��lr�. 080266 0850 C a f )t t MAP REVISED: •I � SEPTEMBER 28. 1982 1 • J+ M I. 9151 C t T e ,. .4t,"•,d", {y �. M •4 i ri .f. federal !�!I f J )LP • t1 lY awWEal.nt twin 4 , 'L,14 1 !`•,K+4 f >f .v�we.liE� 2 It S f]A'•nv3f ,•7,�DL a` .."IJ'' '---� EXHIBIT "H" 900085 Planned Unit IDevelopment Change of Zone AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS MINERALS AND/OR SUBSURFACE Application No. Subject Property 9S—AA, Ltd (FOSTER RTDGE RUSTNESS PARK) STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. COUNTY OF WELD THE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn, states that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names and addresses of all min,�-al owners and lesses of mineral owners on or under the parcel of land which is the subject of the application as their names appear upon the records in the Weld County Clerk and Recorder's Office, or from an ownership update from a title or abstract company or an attorney. 11-7 GENERAL PARTNER The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me this /`/ day of J` e„a/ez "ne . , 19f9 WITNESS my hand and official seal. My Commission expires: 7/29//990 `-7a/Lat/7J Notary Public/- � 67/O .�#uI L 7-4,646-u/ h°tiZZ�e Ov L?erer SD /4u _960095 Planned Unit Development Change of Zone NMEE QE DWNEBE QE eRQegRIY NLIRIN EEEI AS OF SEPTEMBER 27, 1989 NAME ADDRESS,TOWN/CITY STATE AND ZIP CODE ASSESSOR'S PARCEL IDENTIFICATION # L & W Partnership 132 S. Skyline Dr. P'. 0. Box 1176 12 0726000004 Mankato, MN 56001 Robert M. and Janice M. .�07� Rademacher 1`774 1-25 Access Rd. ^� -+ Longmont 1b00@Q�29 CO 80501 Frank Ed Weingardt & Elizabeth Weingardt 14116 WCR 7 1=0722000034 Longmont , CO 80501 Mountain States 12072200005 1801 California #3130 120722000020 Telephone & Telegraph Company Denver , CO 80202 Undivided 1/3 to Edward A. oAnderson & 401 Main Street Einar Ntinl Bank Longmont , CO 8050i 120727000044 of Longmont ATTN: Trust Dept. 120727000044 Donald C. Hilgers 2322—S. ,•.,22 .S. Rogers Villa 120722 000021 #20 Mesa, AZ 85202 First National Bank of Longmont 401 Main Street Longmont 120727000043 , CD 80501 Kitely Farms, A General Partnership 13844 WCR 7 1207270@0047 Longmont , CO 80501 Valley 66, A Limited Partnership % John P. Gavin 513 Lincoln Ave 120723000031 Winnetka, IL 60093 Sek i ch Business Part; 14311 Mead Street Longmont 12072300!000 CO 80501 120723001004 9C0085 EXHIBIT "I" 900085 Planned Unit Development Change of Znne AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS SURFACE ESTATE Application No. Subject Property 25-66. Ltd. (FOSTER RIDGE BUSINESS PARK) STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. COUNTY OF WELD THE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn, states that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names, addresses and the corresponding Parcel Identification Number assigned by the Weld County Assessor of the owners of property (the surface estate) within five hundred (500) feet DI the property subject to the application. This list was compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor, or an ownership -update from a title or abstract company or attorney, derived from such records, or from the records of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. The list compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor shall have been assembled within thirty (30) days of the application submission date. GENERAL PARTNER The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me this /4 Aay 5 i13 , i9 � by. WITNESS my hand and official seal. My Commission expires: 722//990 '72 7evuly-rt-i Notary Public 7/O 14-/-1�1- :`sG( '6-fl/ , .C& 8a /do 900085 The following is a list of the names and addresses of all mineral _owners on or under NE} Section 27, Township 3 North, Range BB West. 1. Mineral Owners 25-66LTD 5660 W. Plymouth Dr. Littleton, CO 80123 All but coal. St. Vrain Land Co. 6999 N York St. Denver, _co 80229 All but coal. Union Pacific Resources 8774 Yates Dr. Suite 100 Westminister, CO 80030 Coal only. 2. Lessees of Owners Amoco Production Co. 1760 Broadway P.O. Box 800 Denver, CO 80201 D11 and gas lease. 900085 ' -FORM NO.C-5000.1 IOa,usawwITM COLOaADO REGION AMERICAN LANO TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S I'DLICT�IORM 1S7O !AMENDED 1O-IT.,O, SCIfED )1I. E A Policy v,, 8D25551 Amount of Insurance$ Order N. Date of Policy November 6 , 1987 7 : 00 A.M. Sheet I of 6 _ J. Name of Insured: 25-66 LTD. , a Colorado -Limited Parntership 2. The estate or interest in the land described herein and-which is covered by this policy is: IN FEE SIMPLE 3. The estate or interest referred to herein is at Date of Policy vested in: 25-66 LTD. , a Colorado Limited Partnership 900085 i FORM tin".C4i000.8 rOR USS-WITH COLDRAOOfltQION ANNRICAN LANG TITt3 At5OCIATION LOAN POLICY 1 PTO IAMtNOtO tO•tL , PAN Ytt WITNIaio.AYnIeOION AMNRICAN LANGi1Tta AtlOCIATION-OWN(NO POLICY-PORN FI.7 ICCCCCCC IO.I T.TOI 8025551 Sheet 2 of 6 SCHEDULE A—Continued The land referred to in this policy is situated in the State of Colorado. County of Weld . and is described as follows: Lhe NE4 of Section 27, Township 3 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M, EXCEPT that portion thereof conveyed to The Highland Ditch Company by Warranty Deed recorded in Book 207 at Page 394, Weld County Records, described as follows: BEGINNING at a point 722 feet West of the East Quarter Corner of said Section 27; thence N56°14 'W 939 feet; • thence N70°45 'W 985 feet; thence N38°W 336 feet to a point on the North and South center line of said Section 27; thence South 1125 feet to the center of said Section 27; thence East 1918 feet to the PLACE OF BEGINNING and EXCEPT those portions thereof conveyed to the Department of Highways, State of Colorado by Special warranty Deeds recorded in Book 1500 at Page 549 and Book 1553 at Page 513 , Weld County Records. FORM NO. C.e000-30 -FOR USE WITN-COLORADO REGION AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNERS POLICY-FORM ■-IS7O (AMENDED 10-17.70) 8025551 Sheet 3 of 6 SCHEDULE This Policy doe, not insure against loss or damage by reason of the following: 1. Rights or claims of parties in pI ',,-ssion not shown by the public records. 2. Easements,or claims of easements. not shown by the public records. 3. Discrepancies,conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, and any facts which a cor- rect survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records. 4. Any lien,or right to a lien,for services, labor,or material heretofore or hereafter furnished,imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5. Taxes due and payable; and any tax, special assessments, charge or lien imposed for water or sewer service,or for any other special taxing district. The 1986 General taxes paid, according to tax certificate dated August 10 , 1987 . 6. Rights of way for county roads 30 feet wide on each side of Section and Township Lines, as established by Order of the Board of County Commissioners for weld County, recorded October 14 , 1889 in Book 86 at Page 273 . 7 . Al; coaL that _may inc. taadPrnoa*h the surface of the subject property , also such right of way and other grounds as may be necessary for the proper working of any coal mines that may be developed upon said _premises and for the transportation of the coal from the same , as reserved by the om an in Deed recorded August 15 , 1892 in Book 106 at Page 443 , an any interests therein or rights thereunder. 8 . Each and every right or rights of access to and from any part of the right-of-way for Colorado State Highway No. 195, a Freeway established according to the laws of the State of Colorado, as conveyed to the Department of Highways , State of Colorado, by deed recorded April 15 , 1958 , in Book 1500 at Page 347 , Weld County Records. -9. Perpetual easement 15 feet wide and 25 feet long for the construction of a dividing box in the Easterly portion of the NE4 of said Section 27 , as granted to The State Highway Commission of Colorado , for the use and benefit of the Department of Highways of the State of Colorado by instrument recorded June 13 , 1958 in Book 1505 at Page 250 , weld County Records. 10 . The Highland Ditch and the right of way therefor, in the NEi of said Section 27 , as disclosed by instruments of record . SC®®85 FORM NO. C.6000•3C IOW DSC-WITH COLORADO`REGION AMERICAN LAND TITLC ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY 1970 (AMENDED 10.17.70, FOR USE WITH COLORADO-REGION AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER S OLICY-PORM S-1970 (AMENDED 10.17.70, 8025551 Sheet 4 of 6 SCHEDULE B—Continued 11 . Oil and Gas Lease between St. Vrain Land Co. , and T.S . Pace, dated May 5, 1970 and recorded July 20, 1970 under Reception No. 1551644 , in Book 630 for a term of 5 years and as long thereafter as oil or gas or either of them is produced from said land or from lands with which said land is consolidated or the premises are being developed or operated , and any interests therein or rights thereunder. NOTE: Extension of the above Lease as claimed by Affidavit of Production pursuant to ' 73 CRS 38-42-106 , by Amoco Production Company, recorded October 24, 1974 in Book 725 as Reception No. 1647345. NOTE: Extension of the above lease as claimed by Affidavit of Pro- duction, pursuant to ' 73 CRS 38-42-106, by_ A{nogp Production Commpany% recorded May 2, 1975 in Book eZ3A as Reception No. 164. 12 . One-half of rents and royal tiPR tIt:P 11 el nil and rrwc laaco ri,*nd Matt S , win on lands( as reserved by St. Vrain Land CO_ in Deed recorded ul 22 , 971 in Book any interests therein or rig dea as Reception N9.6.11.722i.8.,72048 , and ^g��s thereunder. Easement and right of way for electric transmission line purposes, as -granted to Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association Inc. , by Valley 66 "a Limited Partnership, " in the instrument recorded August 13, 1974 in Book 721 as Reception No. 1642635, affecting the following described property: Beginning at a point on the South line of the NE4 said Section 27, 250 feet Westerly from the East Quarter corner of said Section 27, said point also being on the West right-of-way line of Interstate Highway Number 25; thence S89°441W, along the South line of the NE4 of said Section 27, 357.9 feet; thence N57°26 'W, 1 , 190. 1 feet; thence N34°J1 'w, 913 . 1 feet; thence 583°22 'W, 527. 0 feet, more or less to a point on the West line of the NE4 of said Section 27; thence Northerly along said west line 60. 4 feet; thence N83°22 'E, 556 . 2 feet; thence S34°31 ' E, 937. 1 feet; thence SS7°26 ' E, 1 , 215 . 6 feet; thence N89°44 'E, parallel to the South line of the NE4 of said Section 27 , 293 . 8 feet, more or less to a point on the West right-of-way line of Interstate Highway Number 25; thence Southerly along said right-of-way line 30 . 0 feet, more or less, to a Point of Beginning. 14 . Easement and right of way for pipe line purposes granted to Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company, a Delaware Corporation by Valley 66 , a Limited Partnership by instrument recorded January 31 , 1975 in Book 731 as Reception No. 1653172 , in which the specific location of the easement is not defined. 94,0085 FORM NO. C•6OOO.3C FOR Unn-WITH COLORADO REGION AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY 1970 (AMENDED 10.11.701 PAR USE WITH COLORADO-REGION AMERICANLAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY-FORM 5-1570 (AMENDED 10.17.701 8023531 Sheet 5 of -6 SCHEDULE B—Continued 15. Easements and rights of way fox existing irrigation ditches, 15 foot wide access road , and powerline along the Westerly right of way of I-25 as shown on the survey of Peter Epp, Registered Land Surveyor, of McCarty Engineering Consultants, Inc. dated May 5 , 1984 as Job No. 1523-1. 1-6 . Easement and right of way for utility lines purposes, as granted to Public Service Company of Colorado by Colorado Jockey Club Land Development Company, a -General Partnership, in the instru- ment recorded April 18 , 1986 in Book 1109 as Reception No. 02050423, affecting the following described property: A parcel of land located in the NE's Section 27, Township 3 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. , more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the East Quarter Corner of said Section 27 and considering the Eastline of said Section 27 as bearing, S00°11' 00"W, with all other bearings contained herein relative thereto; Thence 589°09' 21"W, a distance of 250 . 04 feet to a point on the West R.O.W. line of Colorado Interstate No. 25 and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING: Thence continuing S89°09' 21"W, a distance of 20. 00 feet; Thence N00°11' 00"E, a distance of 1557. 96 feet; Thence N15°36 ' 23"W, a distance of 1020 . 34 feet to a point on the South R.O.W. of U.S . Highway No. 66 ; Thence 588°18' 38"E, a distance of 20. 95 feet; Thence S1S°36 ' 23"E, a distance of 1019. 43 feet; Thence S00°11 ' 00"W parallel to the East line of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 27, a distance of 1557 . 60 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. 17 . Deed of Trust from 25-66 LTD, a Colorado Limited Partnership to the Public Trustee of the County of Weld for the use of VALLEY 66, a Limited Partnership to secure $465 , 000 . 00 dated November 2 , 1987 recorded November 5 , 1987 in Book 1175 as Reception No . 02120381 9%.0085 W C Q a b S Z om • W} Nq N wz OO W OK zw w N`p CO F 2N WU N WW -.i ON O NW ~ NZ1. .. OW -o U CI- . Na N V a U O -Jr M N N N QC L WW 010 2\ • Q • N0 SO WC O N2� 4ti F"W r • OW OWN MO Ott WM= N X 2 b K No 0 40a 0 ��}0 NNa OWE M N V 0 NEON - NO V 2£ 11 ( 000 N N •- M O NNOLO° X030 0030 PION N No O}0o I an-awi I aU MN w +0000 p MQO O aWN X W 1#-1 NJ NM CDC —ECO CCUQ 4.0 NNWI- ]001X-1= . V200 1 x COO I NdU �DNNO WV SOW!-2 ONOO OWE I O UIf>� 0111H NN OUW . N WNI-Ni ` 'NOON *TON . O rN 0111 UN 0U WN'MW V WU COW.-0�Q0. O WN20-C2 00 10+2WN2Q Z 0O WN_ Oo1�Ld0 POW 0 e Ww0 O N++1ZOX O N.P Jy0 111F.1aao£ NNW...1£ �00d'N O POJN O 0 F" h 0 -WN M NNO P x100 00 3 nN Wa WO n0}3W N.M NXWVN 111Q ...1N 0X1-IwZ nXNNZ 0 COcC NN S N 2 STN Nr1F- w u1F-KwO OVNIMO MCNNO MX-'3d't O2 nXQO.y0 P 20i- 1-4 \ NF- ow NF-OM� NaO2WI-o-INpite £ VaWZNo . a3Vw 0 NI -30 u1F- a4.yx PI-F-111� N W O C W M W w £ O Z Q W UJ W W} 00 N WM MW 00 QM Co WU ON N N NW NW NW OW } ON OW NQ 1. ON MN W �S Q 01� F"0 C 2 AL Z NM N }d' N N P.- NC a a �F- 0 WF- -o Od -C pU -O N nCU N.2 10 MU V NW D No CZ O2 N CO 0 PN V 4002 V N JL1 O KN VO 0N NU O CaM PNa P MN= N O V0 0 NSV ID Na a NWOfflT Q Mme N N 1}.0 vU n NUV DL�rY WWNEU WET N 20 1 U ON 0 V22na o CNN OUW.. P MOP . WOE INNU 1 OONd' I OOf022tipt Max..1 OLUO n 0111Y C S . NON 0] nNN C 1 7 Ud} I 0: U DOd' 0 N WUF-F-W 'TUNNW V W 2 wWw o dX 000 OOaaQZ 0o 0>0z P 00 0 2N2 Qaaz ^Owe �0 00Oo - POatO WONZ O CZ OOONME . oO WN in =NOM< VmNxN O PNNaaa -ONaaa 00 - >i- C COW O OXMNz SZS P 22x >N a .Vr Fe w'T(£b ®®fz,flf/��pp ^� •raL 0 laci-onaCXONZ Mx�arra MX�aoca r-)(Z ooU_ J<iSlBJC75 na £a£.o InNxv� nF-�ol�o na £¢£ ulaw •exN.oz 0 1nN�ola_o 111N(7V N� va.•+Mo I I• EXHIBIT J 900085 EXHIBIT J A. Large inlet ditch to Foster Reservoir on the west boundary of our property is _owned by the Highland Ditch Comp-any, Inc. 4322 Slate Highway 66 Longmont , Colorado 80501 B. There are three internal ditches. One serves I.;ub_.iect property only. Second serves the Elizabeth Rademacher Farm 7. Louis Rademacher 13184 WCR 13 Mead , Colorado 80542 Third ditch serves the following three farms: Edward Anderson .3528 WCR 28 Longmont , Colorado 80501 Adler Farms Floyd Adler 401 Westminister Longmont, Colorado 80501 L & W Partnership P. O. -Box 1176 Mankato, Minnesota 56001. 9C0095 EXHIBIT K 9©0985 EXHIBIT K SUMMARY OF COVENANTS This is a brief synopsis of the covenants that were discussed or mentioned in this rezoninr7 application. This is not intended to be all inclusive. Final. _covenants will be submitted with the final plat . a. Architecture and Design - This will be c:ons>i start throughout each .r- a ••- Commercial. and Light Industrial. . Also there will be an Architectural and Design Committee to .approve each project on an individual basis. This committee will look at design , such items ate- e g , landscaping, fencing , building materials, signage, screening , 7. open space, height , set back requirements, and adherance to other covenants. b. Each of the above ment:i oned items will have its own covenant and requirements. c. Wild Life - Basic-ally this covenant. will -cover the following: 1 . Any trees or _shrubs removed will be replaced. - Trees and shrubs: should be planted along boundary lines in excess of so many feet in the Foster Reservoi r Area. 7. Landscaping on the developed area to use xeri.c species of grasses. 4. The handling of nuisance wild life. d. Fire Authority -• To contact the Longmont Fire Protection Authority prior to obtaining a building permit so to satisfy them of proper- permits. This will assure proper sprinkling and alarm systems, etc. e. Sewage - All owners of lots will be required to hook up to the St . Vrain Sanitation District lines when they are available. 900085 REFERRAL LIST NAME: Foster Ridge Business Perk -CASE NUMBER: Z-452 REFERRALS SENT: October 24, 1989 -REFERRALS -TO BE RECEIVED BY: November 8, 1989 COUNTY TOWNS and CITIES Attorney _Ault X Health Department Brighton Extension Service �Dacono 7,__Extension Emergency Management Office _Eaton 1�X Sheriff's Office Erie ✓X Engineering Evans Housing Authority Firestone _Airport Authority 'Fort Lupton _ ,Building Inspection Frederick _Garden City STATE Gilcrest X Division of Water -Resources Greeley Geological Survey Grover Department of Health Hudson X Highway Department _,Johnstown 1-1—Division of Wildlife Keenesburg_ X dater Conservation Board _Kersey 7—Oil and Gas Conservation Commission __La Salle Lochbuie FIRE DISTRICTS Longmont Ault F-1 X Mead Berthoud F-2 Milliken Brighton F-3 New Raymer _Dacono F-19 Nunn Eaton F-4 Platteville _Fort Lupton F-5 _Severance _Galeton F-6 Windsor Hudson 1-7 _ "— _Johnstown F-S COUNTIES -La Salle F-9 Adams 'X Longmont F-10 _Boulder _Milliken F-11 Larimer _Nunn F-12 — - _-Pawnee Platteville F-13 FEpERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES Platte Valley F-14 41X US Army Corp of Engineers i Poudre Valley 1'-15 USDA-APHIS Veterinary Service —Raymer s_ Southeast Weld F-16 Federal Communication Commission Federal Aviation Administration _ ----Wiggins F-17 ' _Wiggins F-18 _Western Hills F-20 SOIL CONSERVATION DISTRICTS Brighton OTHER wort Collins ✓ X Central Colo. -Water Conservancy Dist. ,- Greeley TX Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. ✓X Longmont Longs Peak Water Association West Adams X Amoco Production Co. in Highland Ditch Company COMMISSION/BOARD MEMBER X Public Servcie Co. of Colorado X Rick Iverson X Union Pacific Resources, Minerals Div. 900055 Page 2 REFERRAL LIST NAME: Foster Ridge Business Park CASE NUMBER: Z-452 REFERRALS SENT: October 24, 1989 REFERRALS TO BE RECEIVED BY: November 8, 1-989 OTHER ✓ it'X Louis Rademacher r X Edward Anderson X Adler Farms ,/ X L & W Partnership S00085 ROYTIOMER to ',. .! '9�', Governor wi ��` JERIS e ngi ELSON \i ��i * Statfgineer *X376-4 / OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 1313 Sherman Street-Room 818 Denver,Colorado 80203 (303) 866-3581 December 4, 1-989 Mr. Keith A. Schuett Weld County Planning Department 915 10th Street Greeley, -CD 80631 Re: Foster Ridge Business Park, Case Number Z-452 Sec. 27, T3N, R68W, 6TH PM Dear Mr. Schuett: We have reviewed the above referenced application to rezone a 113 acre parcel from agricultural to commercial/industrial . No information was submitted regarding anticipated water requirements. The Longs Peak Water Association has been designated as the source of water and a letter of commitment for service has been submitted. Information available in our files indicates that the Association may have sufficient water resources to serve this development and we recommend approval of rezoning. Sincerely, cr,vnizafi James R. Hall , P.E. Supervising Water Resources Engineer JRH/JTS:clf/6738I cc: Alan Berryman, Division Engineer ' d 1 1. ct ACjirtf , ,-. DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES ' 44411 n.:' r. Z.)r � r-1 _AC7/'I 11 i PHONE(303)3581000,FXT.4400 915 10th STREET 1 ��C� GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 WIIIDO J\t `. 1 . u .,,,0„,"' : COLORADO weld O pFthbkw, , CASE NUMBER Z-452 October 24, 1989 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from Foster Ridge Business Park, c/o James Rees, General Partner, (25-66, Ltd.) for a Change of Zone from Agricultural to Planned Unit Development for C-3 (Commercial) and (I-1) Industrial uses. The parcel of land is described as part of the NE} of Section 27, T3N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been -submitted is west of and adjacent to 1-25, and south of and adjacent to State Highway 66. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by November 8, 1989, -so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Keith A. Schuett, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it !MIMIC i\�, does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the -!!!r, following reasons. ki . 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request ni " (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our _�._ Ea= town for the following reasons: 3. We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our n y interests. � � " 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be „: ;11.711 . .Y � � submitted to you prior to: 5. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Signed: n)„&fc.., Agency: r\_,Itill ACirL2 Date: //_ 41 -1-)/ PPA RECEIVED OCT 2 5 1',:>,' 900085 STATE OF COLORADO . RoyRtomer, Governor DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES REFER TO: DIVISION OF WILDLIFE . AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER rj Perry D. Olson, Director iw,. 6060 Broadway " I q Denver,Colorado 80216 �'�'0F ~ Telephone:(303)297-1192 Larry Rogstad, District Wildlife Manager November 17, 1989 1528 28th avenue court Greeley, Colorado 80631 Mr. Keith Schuett, Current Planner Weld County Deparment of Planning ;I r 915 10th street ' Greeley, Colorado 80631 ,G C ,9r9 Iff ff Re: Case Number Z-1.152 �- Dear Mr. Schuett Weld Co. Ptaudok w+da07tm-u0,. Enclosed, you will find a copy of a letter to your department concerning Case Number S-301, the sketch plan for 25-66 Ltd. In that letter the Division of Wild- life expressed its concerns about the impact to habitat and ultimately the wild- life resource if 25-66 Ltd. is developed. -The letter also makes several suggestions to offset potential habitat loss resulting from development of the property. Mr. Jim Rees, General Partner of Foster Ridge Business Park (25-66 Ltd.), and I met last summer to discuss the Division's letter and the proposed development. In that meeting Mr. Rees indicated that he agreed in principle with the letter, sand would attempt to incorporate its suggestions in development plans. In a phone call this fall Mr. Rees informed me that he was planning to go forward with a Change of Zoning application for the parcel. He told me that he felt the appropriate place to address our recommendations would be in the property covenants. In Z-1t52 application parts 3-dh, 18h, and Exhibit K the developers reiterate their support for the Division of Wildlife suggestions. The purpose of this letter is to restate some of the Division's concerns, and request that our recommendations in the earlier letter be incorporated in the zoning application. The Division's greatest concern with this P.U.D. is the potential impact it may have on water quality at Foster Reservoir and the drainage below it. 25-66 Ltd. lies directly upslope from the reservoir. Soils on the property are not suitable for septic systems. Storm drainage from the P.U.D, could increase erosion and siltation in and around the reservoir. The use of septic systems and impacts from runoff could result in eutrophication at Foster Reservoir, with resultant algal blooms, increased pollution, fish and/or wildlife die offs. Therefore, the Division would recommend that this P.U.D. link in with an existing sewage treatment system if possible, or at the very least, use a vault and pump system to handle domestic sewage. Runoff should be channeled away from Foster Reservoir, or be funneled through a siltation basin before it enters the Reservoir. The Division would request the following additions under part 7 in this zoning application: DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, Hamlet J. Barry, Executive Director WILDLIFE COMMISSION, George VanDenBerg, Chairman • Robert L. Freidenberger, Vice Chairman • William R. Hegberg, Secretary Eldon W. Cooper, Member • Rebecca L. Frank, Member • Dennis Luttrell, Member • Gene B. Peterson, Member • Larry M. Wright, Member S000ss 1) In paragraph one Landscaping of lots will incorporate the use of xeric (low water use) species of grasses, shrubs and trees. Water conservation should be an integral part of any front range development. By avoiding large plantings of bluegrass in this P.U.J. we may be able to avoid problems caused by foraging Canada Geese. The open space area adjacent to Foster Reservoir should be large enough to create a 600 foot setback from the high water line to the nearest building. This would provide an adequate separation between the development and the lake area. It would also help to create -a buffer between the de- velopment and hunting activity that occurrs around the lake. Shrub/tree plantings should be installed along the boundry adjacent to Foster Reservoir. This will provide shelter for wildlife, and help establish a spatial barrier between the F.U.D. and the Reservoir. Disturbed areas in the open space should be interseeded or reseeded with suitable mixtures of mid/tall grasses and legumes. Trees removed during construction of the P.U.D. will be replaced at a minimum one for one ratio. 2) Under Section 18h of the application the -Division requests: A copy of the letter from the -Division of Wildlife regarding Case Number S-301 be included as an exhibit. That the developer and/or landowners within this P.U.D. shall assume responsibility for taking care of nuisance wildlife problems in this development. 'That nuisance wildlife problems shall be handled in compliance with all apropriate Federal, State, and local law. The Divsion has appreciated the opportunity to comment on this zoning proposal. We would be happy to meet with the developers, or the Planning Commission to discuss any questions. The Division feels that this P.U.D. proposal, if planned properly, could benefit wildlife as well as the citizens of Weld County. Sincerely yours, Larry Rdgstad Enc. 9C 0085 STATE OF COLORADO Roy Ro;ner, Governor DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES REFER TO. !DIVISION OF WILDLIFE h cO 1 H400..:a`, James B. Ruch, Director �ri��I e60nv Broadway �p`�0 * 1 Denver, Colorado E0216 Telephone: (303) 297-1192 y pF,� y,' Larry Rogstad, District Wildlife Manager 1528 28th avenue court Greeley, Colorado. 80631 phone 352-21123 .a Weld County Planning Department Re: Case number S-301 915 10th street Greeley, Colorado 80631 To Whom It May Concern: -The Division of Wildlife has reviewed the application from 25-66 Ltd. and has made a site inspection. You will find our comments in this letter. The applicant claims that there are no unique natural features, i.e. wildlife, -on the development site. While in a strict sense that may be true, the property does directly border Foster Reservoir. Foster Reservoir is an important habitat area, for several different wildlife species. - Species of concern that use this area include: waterfowl, shorebirds, herons, raptors including the Bald Eagle, pheasants, cottontail rabbits, red fox, coyote, and mule and white-tail deer. A large number of passerine (song bird) species, also can be found using the wetland area, marshes and midgrass habitat surrounding Foster Reservoir. Many other species of birds, mammals, amphibians and fishes can be found here. -Therefore the area around Foster Reservoir, including the 25-66 property, is a key wildlife area. In fact, Foster Reservoir is included on the map of im- portant wildlife Habitat in the Weld County Comprehensive plan. Foster Reservoir also has been used by waterfowl hunters for many years. This use will probably continue in the future. Development close to the lake shore may conflict with the hunting activities of neighboring land owners. Increased human activity especially during the spring and early summer might adversely impact wildlife production on Foster Reservoir. Human activity in the area may make Foster Reservoir "less attractive" for wintering bald eagles as roost sites and/or hunting areas. In essence, development around this lake will adversely impact available habitat with a resultant loss in species richness and lower population levels. The best solution, in terms of the wildlife resource, would be to leave Foster Reservoir and the area surrounding it undeveloped. However, that may not be possible. _If the application for 25-66 Ltd. is approved, the Division of Wild- life would make the _following recommendations to mitigate the loss of habitat: 1) That trees and shrubby vegetation be preserved whenever possible. 2) Irrigation ditches crossing the property remain untiled and uncovered to provide -cover and travel space for wildlife. 3) The open space area along the south side of the property, adjacent to Foster Reservoir, should extend a minimum of 600 feet from the high water line of the lake. _This would provide adequate buffer between the lake and human activity. Additionally this would provide a safe zone to separate hunters from the development. Size T steel shot will carry approximately 300 yards. DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, Clyde O. Martz, Executive Director • WILDLIFE COMMISSION, Rebecca L Frank, Chairman George VanDenBerg, Vice Chairman • Robert L Freidenberger, Secretary • Eldon W. Cooper, Member • William P. l iegyber M mbgr Dennis Luttrell, Member • Gene B. Peterson, Member . Larry M. Wright Member 9000 Without an adequate buffer, shot could conceivably land on buildings, vehicles and People. in the development. b) Shrub and tree plantings should be established along the south edge of the bus- iness and light industrial area to act as a visual screen between the develop- ment and Foster Reservoir. The plantings would also provide shelter and food for wildlife. Recommended species include but should not be limited to: plum, wild rose, chokecherry, lilac, russian olive, sumac sp., juniper, Red cedar, caragana, flanking cherry, willow, cottonwood, and hackberry. The planting should be a mixture of different plant species to provide height and visual heterogeneity. 5) Disturbed areas in the open space portion of the project should be reseeded with a mixture of mid/tall-grasses including but not limited to: switchgrass, bluestem, indiangrass; western wheatgrass, tall wheatgrass, pubescent wheat- grass, and tall fescue. The mixture should also include some alfalfa as a nitrogen fixer, and to provide heterogeneity. 6) landscaping on the developed portion of the parcel should use xeric (low water use) species of grass including: buffalo grass/blue grama, brome/fescue mixtures. Once establised, these species require less water, fertilizer and care. 7) Trees removed during construction should be replaced at a minimum of one for one. 8) Sewage treatment should be handled through a vault system with periodic pumping until the development can tie in with a public sewer system. The use of sep- tic systems and leach fields in close proximity to wetlands and lakes can cause eutrophication of the aquatic area, with resultant algal blooms, high -BOD levels and persistent problems with pollution. Thersoil classification for the parcel include Thedalund load and Aquills and Aquepts both of which are not suitable for septic systems. The Nunn Clay Loam is suitable for sep- tic systems only when the lower layers are loam or sandy loam. Therefore, septic systems on a good portion of the property may not function properly with resultant runoff into Foster Reservoir. 9) Storm drainage from the parcel should be funneled into a siltation basin before it enters Foster Reservoir. Additionally the developers and users of this development should be aware that they will be responsible for handling nuisance wildlife within the parcel. When one buildsin a rural, wildlife rich setting they can expect "visits" from skunks rodents and.other undesirable creatures. The Division of Wildlife will provide information on how to control nuisance animals. But the landowners will be responsible. for the actual control. Of course, methods used to control unwanted wildlife must be lawful. The Division has appreciated the opportunity to comment on this application. We would be willing to meet with the developer to discuss any questions he might have. or offer information on how to maximize the development for wildlife as well as people. Best - Regards, Larry Rogstad 900085 STATE OF COLORADO DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS # T...OPN s P.O. Box 850 .tst Greeley,Eolorado 80632-0850 (303)353-1232 $"( * {�'M1fM1SF November 9, 1989 Dr>) y `; Weld Co. - S.H. 66 � ltti�O Faster Ridge Bus. Park N0V 1 3 1989 File: 25-66 Ltd. Sketch Plan U S S.W. Cor. I-25 Weld Co. Planning amnusslm, and S.H. 66 DOH File 45100 Mr. Keith Schuett Department of Planning Services Weld County 915 Tenth Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Dear Mr. Schuett: We have reviewed the Foster Ridge Business Park which was previously submitted as the 25-66 Ltd. P.U.T. Sketch Plan. The following comments on this Planned Unit Development incorporate those made in our letter of April 25, 1989, and take into account the traffic analysis by Leigh, Scott and Cleary, Inc. As stated in our previous letter, the location and number of access points along StateIighway 66 are regulated by the State Highway Access Code. The western proposed access to this P.U.D. is not consistent with the one-half mile spacing criteria for this category of highway. -This access needs to be located within 200 feet of the west boundary of this property which is the quarter section line. We note that the Highland Ditch runs along the west property line so it is not possible to place the access at that location. The intent of the one-half mile access location is to allow for major potentially signalized intersections which serve as many properties as possible. Since this access and the interior road cannot be on the west property line due to the ditch, it is important to allow for a future road connection to the adjacent property to the west. A road right of way needs to be shown on the plans extending to the west prop- erty line to allow for future access across the ditch. In addition to the above comments on the western access, we have dis- cussed with the District Engineer the additional access near the center of the property frontage on State Highway 66. The traffic analysis has recommended a right-turn in and out/left-turn in only access with appropriate design and signing to inhibit left turns onto the highway. This limited type of access is recommended to accommodate the high level of projected traffic. 900085 MR. KEITH SCHUETT November 9, 19$9 Page two We have no objection to planning for a future additional access near the center of the property to relieve demand at the western access. However, this access would not be permitted until the design of the western access is exceeded by actual traffic volumes. This would most likely occur when westbound left turns exceed the storage capacity of the left-turn deceleration lane (300 left turning passenger vehicles per hour or a sufficient combination of cars and trucks exceeding -a 250-foot storage capacity) . As indicated in the traffic analysis, the western access and the future east access would require right-turn acceleration/deceleration lanes and left-turn deceleration lanes. These lanes must be designed according to the speed limit at the time of the application for access, currently 55 mph. We encourage the applicant to coordinate the design of the access improvements with this office prior to application for the Access Permit. Thank you for the opportunity to review this development plan. Please contact me at 350-2163 if you have any questions. Very truly yours, DOUGLAS D. HANES DISTRICT ENGINEER Cd2 man A. Hooper/Jr. Development/Access Coordinator EAR:smw cc: L.D. Yost Area Foreman File: Hooper/Crier via Rames 900085 The Highland Ditch Company 4322 State Highway 6 Longmont, CO 80501 November 2 , 1989 Weld County Dept. of Planning 915 10th Street Greeley, CO. 80631 In reference to the Foster Ridge Business Park . The Board of Directors of The Highland Ditch Company make this following request and statement. 1 . No obstructions , no fences , no gates , no trash dumping, no interference, to Highland Ditch inlet ditch or to Foster -Reservoir itself. 2 . Our ditch riders and Superintendent must at all times be able to have access to the reservoir, inlet ditch and road that the ditch riders use during the year. 3 . The _Highland Ditch Company Board of Directors is very concerned with the safety of human life around its ditches and reservoirs . They are also concerned about the trash and debris that usually goes along with commercial and industrial uses . A . Being able to maintain the inlet ditch and the reservoir by the Superintendent and his men is also very important and is a year around job. Heavy equipment and trucks could be involved as maintenance is needed and they must have access at all times . Respectfully submitted, ---7. )1 i I (J ci:.A-e 14 Ann M. Hauck Office Manager / II1/ �j l sg 9E:D�,� . PfnIIaJgR �WDp11 1��. 900085 PANHANDLE EASTERN RIPE LINE COMPANY 635 No. 7th Brighton, Colorado 80601 (303) 659-5922 November 2 , 1989V-IiN.--i;1‘„i r ; ,:y 7�►� } °'`'` 1989 Mr. Keith A. Schuett Current Planner L' ' Weld County Dept. of Planning Weld Co #'I,a•s+++� s foil,,, 915 10th Street Greeley, CO. 80631 RE: Case #Z-452 - Foster Ridge Business Park - c/o James Rees, General Partner (25-66 , LTD) - Zoning change. Dear Mr. Schuett: Please find enclosed a copy of our as-built map, which shows our pipeline ( 16-10-075-173-4" ) , in the hi-lighted areas, that is located in Northeast Quarter of Section 27, Township 3 North. Range 68 West, Weld County, Colorado. At this time, Panhandle Eastern does not foresee any conflicts with the rezoning proposal . however, before we give our recommendations Panhandle is requesting that Mr. Rees contact us to be made aware of the following stipulations in case of future construction activities. Panhandle Eastern maintains a 50-foot wide right-of-way on all. pipelines and will not allow any building within that easement -area. Utility lines, streets, sidewalks, and driveways may be installed at approximate right angles to the pipeline herein authorized, provided, however, that all utilities cross under our pipeline with a minimum clearance equal to the diameter of the larger utility or18" , whichever is greater. No paved or traveled portion of any street, sidewalk, driveway, road, alley, or curbing will be placed substantially parallel to and within fifteen ( 15' ) feet of the pipeline, provided adequate working space is available on the other side of the pipeline. in the event of a proposed crossing with a road or utility, please contact Utility Notification Center of Colorado (UNCC) at 534-6700 (Local & Metro Denver) , or 1-800-922-1987 (Outside the Metro area) , with two (2) business days notice, and at no coat to you, we will locate and mark our lines to eliminate accidents that can occur from foreign forces. 900085 We will be more than happy to work with everyone involved, however, it -must be noted that if for any reason our lines must be moved, it will be at the expense of the developer or the person or persons asking for this movement. If additional information is needed, please call me at 659-5922, ext. 2-22. Sincerely, cvro 77, Larry E. Abston Area Supervisor _attachments xc: File /600 Q' 1 I _ .___ a-41_ _n . eiA) il 87°29'37 1044.7 II • TT 14-10-075-1309-4" 19-40-07-5-7813" I M a M- IAMOCO-VpLIEY 66-2 FREDRICKSON Na I MS 1/2344 .:.S X50690 AMOCO-VALLEY _66-1A •N.S 8103 ', "• I a-I0-075-227-3IL 19-10 , / s4a. ' 55' Foster 14-10-075-651-4" j 27 Reservoir I • 19 10-075-21-3 AMOCO-ANDERSON FAMILY TRUST No. 2 ?' I rAMOCO ANDERSON its. /ins* 1 I MS 7597 /03°53'/2" 14-10—O75-795I 4'� •q I 16-10-075-60 -4" I I i 55' I �,� •. ----- -14-10-075-1069-4" X II9-I • --.4 „ x • 65' 1 I I I x r 90°24:'3" d —_• • - . ,. _ ° \ ;7 - �'� 0 • A6� I `• 3, 680.2 ' . .I ,T —•.� 03 I — —/25: ` 615' o r 14 !p 75-743 • • A • x �O'• 1 i Ii`a' "b /.443.30' •� I I • 1 S !/099 SI I r I6-10-075-174 -4" 25 AMOCO If / I / ' I =_ ADLE *� AMOCO- ADLER AMOCO -ANDERSON C I I • II M.S 8074 • C I saki , " A.P.C.-FLOYD ADLER'S TRUE#1 8 / 3• ^ MS 679614-10-075-1 19-4. M.S.30625 _0 _ I i 1078' 19-10 " _ I— 1 075-127-3 ` 1 2524.8e— =— —_34 -- /02°0/03" 4 II 6-I0-075-21I-4" I - IS-10-075-287-3'� AMOCO-F. ADLER-8-1 ;( ir A0�axMs.a/7/ AM CO-ANDERSONn `' 90008 AMITYTRUST II /022.63' „ No. C 2 I/ ^ 14-IO 075 408 4 MS.//247 19 l,0-p 5-128-3'1- \0' J / \ IT-10-075-784-3" = 1�III .. - . I April 17, 1989 _ 7y 7o y �1dJl�zi`` ti Platte River Resident Office C LM,J , I D.S. Army Corps of Engineers I 9307 State Highway 121 r (VDV 3 1989 Littleton, Colorado 80123-6901 `' Keith A. Schuett Weld C6. fatuous wASA tt, Department of Planning Services 913 - 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Dear Mr. Schuett: Reference is made to your April 12, 1989 letter and my subsequent April 17 site visit which concerns Case Number S-301 (Jim Rees) project which will impact approximately 0.13 acres of wetland located at NE % of Section 27, T-3-N, R-68-W, Weld County, Colorado. See attached map. Based on the information you provided, this office has determined that the proposed work is authorized by the Department of the Army Nationwide Permit found at 33 CFR Part 330.5(a) (26). Enclosed is a fact sheet which fully describes this Nationwide Permit and lists the Special Conditions which must be adhered to for this authorization to remain valid. Although an Individual Department of the Army permit will not be required for the project, this does not eliminate the requirement that you obtain any other applicable Federal, State, or local permits as required. Please note that deviations from the original plans and specifications of your project could require additional -authorization from this office. Should you at any time become aware that either an endangered species or its critical habitat exist within your project area, you must immediately notify this office. You are advised that this verification of the nationwide permit authorization is valid until April 17, 1991. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to contact this office or call Terry McKee at 303/979-4120 or 4121 and reference Nationwide Permit application number CO-89-48. Sincerely, Terry McKee Environmental Resource Specialist cf: Permit Files Omaha Permits Branch Colorado Dept. of Health U.S. Fish and Wildlife Environmental Protection Agency Colorado Division of Wildlife _900085 — 27, az 300.//100"14/ 2657 g/' East Quarter -. Sect-Ion 2 IN ERSTATE //WK E3 BZ % a N T a - _- °l/00"LV /557.60' �� y SOD Y F . I:v I dal) j w l c rt4g — e .�. . _ 1▪ .a t4� s•tro l) 42 j ▪ , 50' fy" • Tart ----------, \• 1 ti \ f Pb t9 . .501 •. R / • ER lAL " %ç;/ ,7,:i`' GrJ j / '' t. / 55\ inV, a\ V /1 le 06 4 12 aef' 4tt CS (01 \ ✓ !5 " 0,7s/orage tank t -64 V j 1 • Pankond/c Eos/em Pipe/iie Company v1=' Jy\ � j Pipe/me easemen!- reception x653/72 VP j lire/d Coun/y records . F T . Slate Genera/ion I Transmission Assoc � \ O . Power/me easement•recep/ion /642635 1 4" 0 Weld County Records ' '• ` �h FOSTER RESER1 •!/ q // OY 0ho (‘ ‘ - - —Citaft ^0 9 r t 1 F/ 1 MMI I , , 38 2'' :!28'/6 E: /474.05' - • _-_ 3 Center of Sec/ion Center/me H/CNGANO Disc If width varies ` � .S'^'i E t% memoR ©um ilkTo Keith Schuett Planning Date jr r 31, 1989 COLORADO From Drew Scheltinga, County Fn El"lcer subject: Foster Ridge Businecc Park ( Tamac Baer, 25-66 bad) Z-452 My comments remain the same as those in my April 21 , 1989 memo. Issues of access onto Colorado State Highway 66 will not be dealt with by this department and should be addressed to the Colorado Department of Highways. In this application, as well as in the sketch plan application, the narrative indicates Weld County will accept the streets for maintenance. It is the Board of Weld County Commissioners policy, that subdivision streets will not be accepted for maintenance. Also, the application narrative indicates the internal streets will be built by the developer as required. The sketch plan indicates the internal streets will be constructed on a lot-by-lot basis. These are not acceptable plans for the development of the interior road system. The applicant is required to show the willingness and financial capability to construct the road improvements necessary to support the site. The applicant should be required to present such a plan, including drafts of proposed agreements for road improvements both on and off site. Lf i;11/ 1 1969 1 DLS/mw:prfrbp to d Ca. tYjjjujrrs , Woo jj9asau: xc: Commissioner Lacy Planning Referral File - Foster Ridge Business Park, 2-452 9W085 OFFICE OF THE sdtRl r • MEMORANDUM Planning Department TO Ed Jordan, Sheriff FROM C- October 27, 1989 DATE Attache RE The Weld County Sheriff's Office has no objection to this application provided that police protection for the area will be addressed with a Law -Enforcement Authority prior to final plat and issuance of any building permits. This concern has been noted in the application under comments and concerns from the sketch plan. Please contact me if you have any questions. EJ:lch pgiG, L,` OCT 2 7 1989 +, Weld CL Pima aussito 900085 8 � ea_d_ ( ' rri,:_e _,,„___ _e_f, „_ ___frza_o_rcbt_ r .12--'n re---11- ,--2J-Cc J�� - C--e_e--e ‘ illY.-ce-eillacit-C-2:75r. l�i n Rol5 i:,77,-i ii I I[± ? V 19891 -itl Cu.-Ma wog Conn isviuu 9C0085 STATE OF COLORADO OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES SUITE 380 LOGAN TOWER BUILDING WILLIAM R. SMITH 1580 LOGAN STREET Director DENNIS R. BIEKNELL DENVER, COLORADO 80203 Deputy Director ROY ROMER (303) 894-2100 Governor NOvember 8, 1989 Keith Schuett PiNs1-1_\04 Department of Planning Services J -915 10th Street Greeley, Co 80631 NOV ``` 19B9 )) Re: Change of Zone Foster Ridge Business Bark WOO CD NE 27-3N-68W Dear Mr . Schuett, This letter is in regards to your request to review and comment on Rees and Company and their intent to rezone NE 27-3N-68W. I have reviewed the application and do not find any conflicts with the plans presented. I did notice that the Valley 66 Unit well operated by Amoco Production Company was not clearly spotted on Exhibit A. Although the oil storage tank battery is shown, the well itself is not. I have enclosed the footages from the section lines of the surface location for this well. Tnis office does support Amoco Production Companies request for a buffer zone around the producing property as requested in their August 1, 1989 letter (Exhibit F) . Future drilling in this area, should it occur , will have to comply with our safety rules, specifically: Rule 603 (a) Wells shall be located a distance of 150 feet or one and one-half times the derrick, whichever is greater, from any occupied building, public road, or major above ground utility line or railroad. Rule 604 (a) (3) Tanks shall be a minimum of 200 feet from the residences, normally occupied buildings, or well defined normally occupied outside area. -Rule 604 (b) (5) Fired vessel, heater treater, shall be a minimum of 200 feet from residences, occupied buildings, or well defined normally occupied outside area. If I can be of any further assistance I may be reached at 894-2100 . Yours truly, 4.114:-P0-71t Stephan Pott 9C0085 Sr . Professional Engineer r • R. 4ii ,8, - I I I S� 1 f / I Ili I 14 ! ,.sr. I :o 4J L. r : 1 1 i I j i i E Ik...._ __ _____ _ _____. _ _ 27___ ... __ _........ ...: _ ... ..._..._ .... ! ; 1 i :':I : i I , I I 11 ! i i i ,L_______. __________________________L___________i_______________]..1. -i--______ __________________ ___________, t;CiE la • :e 1000 Pa Vier $ Elevation Company Inc. t ht- � in accordance witt-, a ire request �en�ara Coior- a� o for Amoco Production Co, f orrt M=o Mci�:1? _lla� determined the location of ., ,� , Ley "L-- 6" Unit Range 684 of the 6th x'rtncjpaS 4t'olI `fir -LL7V1/1iSfrip , L meridian Weld , county, Colorado I here �' , `. hereby certify t a this plat �� j accurate r r „ . a+ is rrr, surrey sl�ow�n se..�'ati�3a: of o correct ,� ire 1c::cQti r° of ?nt lo- K-74 7777r yr � � . fi :•7-,..t.:: :' 900085 47 V�D,If,C"'L ij rtN1; a LONGMONT FIRE PROTECTIO N DISTRICT � f�� -9119 County Line Rd., Longmont, CO 80501 j ! '• ?)1/ i S J (303) 772-0710 Metro(303) 666-4404 t feed Ci,. :'ll:m�cs w,fl is-: is Mr . Keith Schuett November 7, 1989 Department of Planning �=}1 S 10th Etreet ree t Greeley, CO -r_!0C3i Mr. Schuett : have r eQei ed the P. L1. D. request for Foster Ridge Business Park and have no conflicts provided the following requirements are met : 1 . All streets and roads must be built to Uniform Fire Code standards ( 10. 207) and must have an all weather surface, prior to construction of any building in -the P. U. D. Turnarounds must have a minimum outside radius of 48 feet . 2. The required fire hydrants and water supply ( fire- flow) shall be iT, place prior to construction of any buildings. Fire flow must meet or exceed the requirements of Uniform Fire Code Appendix III -A, and table no. Ili -A-A. Fire hydrant placement shall be in accordance with Uniform Fire Code Appendix 11I -B and Table no. III B-A. A plan showing placement of hydrants, size of pipe, location of pipe, and a schedule of projected fire flows for the system must he presented and approved prior to installation. Testing of pipe and hydrants will be in accordance with National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) publication #24 " Installation of Private Fire _Service Mains and Their Appurtenances" . The Fire Marshal or his representative shall -witness and sign off tfie testing. 3. -The Longmont Fire Protection District recommends the P. U. D developers install the hydrant system as opposed to the individual building developers for the sake of marketability, :O4If all Bost benefit , ease of future development, and to ensure building developers can build in this area. Note : The Lcnkmi+ont Fife Protection District will not allow construction of buildings where there is inadequate water supply for fire-flow requirements per Uniform Fire Code and NFPA standards. 4. All new construction must meet the requirements for fire protection set forth by The Longmont Fire Protection ietiict. The Fir_ District must see all plans for all new buildings before construction takes place . 4900085 S. The Longmont Fire Protection District requires that all contracts be consummated within one ( 1 ) year from the date of this letter, or this letter shall become null and void unless extended in writing by this District . If you have any questions , please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, cc : file -- � — 1 � `�'�C) Steve Ward fosridge Plan Reviewer \ ' ' �� LONGS PEAK sot WATER ASSOCIATION P.O. BOX 714 • LONGMONT, CO 80502-0714 • (303) 776-3847 November 10, 1989 Mr. Keith A. Schuett Department of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Re: Foster Ridge Business Park Case No. Z-452 Dear Mr. Schuett: This letter supplements previous commitment letters which Longs Peak Water Association has issued in connection with the above-referenced matter. Please be advised that Longs Peak Water Association is able to provide the Foster Ridge Business Park with whatever quantity of water is required for development of the Business Park on the condition that the Business Park pay the cost of extending a sufficiently large water line to the Park to meet the Park's need and, as stated in the Association's previous letters, subject to the owner's compliance with any other Association charges, rules and regul-ations. This statement of the Association's willingness to serve will remain valid for a period of six months from the date of this letter. Please contact me if you have any questions concerning this matter. Very truly yours, 1 ; Vernon Peppler, President DFB:VP:sd cc: Foster Ridge Business Park (Att'n: James Rees) t, l 7 s 19 i ;,� LPWA\FRBP-L.sCH h61,g 1Yi29it4},,dlk iiM O .10 t 8€0085 O �M �, v f of c.o<o 0 q . NQ vo WE-90-0003 ROY R. ROMER # 1�� SEA y5� a GOVERNOR \ ;/ JOHN W. ROLD DIRECTOR 1876 ilt COLORADO GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 715 STATE CENTENNIAL BUILDING - 1313 SHERMAN STREET DENVER, COLORADO 80203 PHONE(303) 866-2611 November 6, 1989c l!, ii . Mr. Keith Schuett j iv i ic" i i t Weld County Department of Planning Services Ji 915 10th Street _'. Greeley, Colorado 80631 weld Cu >y) o, (I a lft RE: Z-452, FOSTER RIDGE BUSINESS PARK Dear Mr. Schuett: We have reviewed the plat and attendant information for the proposed rezoning. Geologic conditions that may affect future development on the property include: potentially collapsing soils, swelling soils and bedrock, potential perched ground water, erosion, and potential radon gas hazard. The site does not appear to be in a 100-year flood plain, and we have no record of any underground mining having occurred on the site. There do not appear to be any significant mineral resources on the site. Geology on the site consists of thin deposits of wind-blown silt and sand (Eolium) overlying Pierre Shale transition zone bedrock. The eolian deposits are prone to hydrocompaction, while soils and bedrock of the Pierre formation generally expand when exposed to water (in some areas the transition member is a sandstone, which would not expand) . Both of these types of soils can cause severe structural and flatwork damage. Especially if perched ground water forms onsite. The Pierre Shale has been found to produce high levels of radon gas along the Front Range. Therefore, we recommend that either houses be constructed using radon gas reduction techniques; or, be tested for radon after completion and any necessary remedial measures be implemented. In conclusion, there appear to be no major geologic concerns which would preclude approval of the proposed rezoning. However, when development is proposed, geotechnical and drainage reports should be prepared. Sincerely, l /Qf7 �,t .' dPhC Candace L. Jochim Engineering Geologist vjr:CLJ-90-047 SC0085 5027 GEOLOGY STORY OF THE PAST... KEY TO THE FUTURE ° if f tisi DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES RECEIVED PHONE(303)3564000,EXT.4400 ' L • 3+ 91510th STREET IGREELEY,COLORADO 80631 WI pc 0CT 2E '89 COLORADO WATERCASE NUMBER Z-452 COLORADO CONSERVATION pt7ARD October 24, 1989 r(r Ji `V 3 1989 J , TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Nerd Cu. Vtaiuuiik oBmm umf Enclosed is an application from Foster Ridge Business Park, c/o James Rees, General Partner, (25-66, Ltd.) for a Change of Zone from Agricultural to Planned Unit Development for C-3 (Commercial) and (I-1) Industrial uses. The parcel of land is described as part of the NEI of Section 27, T3N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is west of and adjacent to 1-25, and south of and adjacent to State Highway 66. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by November 8, 1989, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Keith A. Schuett, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: 3. X We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. A formal _recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Please/ ( refer to// the enclosed letter. 1 ////11 �//,. 1 �� Signed: CU.k- #& Agency: CA-Gl Waf&& ( vti Date: /0 - 31 ' (' 9€0085 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE(303)356-4000,EXT.4400 915 101h STREET GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 C. CASE NUMBER Z-452 COLORADO October 24, 1989 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from Foster Ridge Business Park, c/o James Rees, General Partner, (25-66, Ltd.) for a Change of Zone from Agricultural to Planned Unit Development for C-3 (Commercial) and (I-1) Industrial uses. The parcel of land is described as part of the NE} of Section 27, T3N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is -west of and adjacent to 1-25, and south of and adjacent to State Highway 66. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by November 8, 1989, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Keith A. Schuett, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with she interests of our town for the following reasons: 3. X We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Ski Signed: C( —r Agency: et." e f,VOA"141 -1 Date: /O 2- 7677 / OCi 2 7 f989 1'.4M Co. Planning :.mmMusiuh 900085 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES D�41> C c my ni7 r�i��` PHONE(303)356-4000,EXT.4400 2n Lr 915 10th STREET GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 111 p O i1� , 1989 C. - r CASE NUMBER Z-452 COLORADO (1216 C6. ihmt.ihoL • October 24, 1989 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from Foster Ridge Business Park, c/o James Rees, General Partner, (25-66, Ltd.) for a Change of Zone from Agricultural to Planned Unit Development for C-3 (Commercial) and (I-1) Industrial uses. The parcel of land is described as part of the NE} of Section 27, T3N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of laud for which this application has been submitted is west of and adjacent to 1-25, and south of and adjacent to State Highway 66. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by November 8, 1989, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Keith A. Schuett, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request • (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: 3. f/ We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Signed: (%1.ih), , , j Qit, Agency: Longmont Soil Conservation District 3n Date: November 3. 1989 SCOOSS / r fif lt f/ \ DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES 111 PHONE(303)356-4000,EXT.4400 915 10th STREET GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 VIED GCf s 7 1989 COLORADO a CASE NUMBER Z-452 r:0-1/ — _ D�, �. y ' �:iy�� ADO October 24, 1989 ( } ) j969 -_,L_TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: WeIn Ce. ? UMP crime mm. Enclosed is an application from Foster Ridge Business Park, c/o James Rees, General Partner, (25-66, Ltd.) for a Change of Zone from Agricultural to Planned Unit Development for C-3 (Commercial) and (I-1) Industrial uses. The parcel of land is described as part of the NE} of Section 27, T3N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is west of and adjacent to 1-25, and south of and adjacent to State Highway 66. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by November 8, 1989, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Keith A. Schuett, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: 3. ✓ We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Please refer to the enclosed letter. /� Signed: '. Vim r Agency: &Y?DC,O P(2D,DUG1?02J Co. Date: // /c/ / cj Col) Y jl K ,.OO85 tvst r DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE(303)356-4000,EXT.4400 91510th STREET GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 O COLORADO• CASE NUMBER Z-452 October 24, 1989 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from Foster Ridge Business Park, c/o James Rees, General Partner, (25-66, Ltd.) for a Change of Zone from Agricultural to Planned Unit Development for C-3 (Commercial) and (I-1) Industrial uses. The parcel of land is described as part of the NE} of Section 27, T3N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of laud for which this application has been submitted is west of and adjacent to 1-25, and south of and adjacent to State Highway 66. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by November 8, 1989, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Keith A. Schuett, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2. We do mot have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: 3. We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Signed: Agency: Date: 960085 Hello