HomeMy WebLinkAbout901191.tiff A82235344
M O RESOLUTION
o U
0
-1O RE: APPROVE TEE SCHEDULE CONCERNING FEES CHARGED BY THE WELD
COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF TLANNING SERVrCEs FOR PROCESSING AND
A -REVIEWING MAND-USE REiRMIT APPLICATIONS
a
o W
o WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County,
(.;w Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home
a• Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the
p affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and
U
W
a WHEREAS , the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County,
.. 0 Colorado, held a public hearing on the 213th day of November, 1990 ,
x at 10 : 00 a.m. , in the Chambers of the Board for the purpose of
w considering an increased fee schedule for fees collected by the
04 Weld County Department of Planning Services for processing and
°�' c-) reviewing land-use permit applications, and
r- z
�
H
WHEREAS, after study and review, the Board deems it advisable
� E to approve the proposed fee schedule concerning said fees,
a effective January 1 , 1)393 , a copy being attached hereto and
p incorporated herein by reference.
a w
M W
cn NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT -RESOLVED by the Board of County
N Z
Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the attached fee
ryo < schedule for land-use permit applications te, and hereby is,
z• approved, to become effective January 1 , 1-991 .
a
The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made
Tr-, and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 2.8th day of
N ti November, A.D. , 1990 .
" .-i
W /��1�i iL�2 BOARD F COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ATTEST:. !f� � WELD NTY, COL O
Weld ,taWity Clerk to the Toard
Gene R. -Brantner, Chairman
BY: Ate// k o ge xknnedy, Fro-Tem
Deputy?, e, erk to the Board
ARPROVED AS TO FORM: ons an e t
_ ;9 . 2 t.f
C C.W. Ki y
--
County Attorney
Gor . L v
9-01191
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES LAND-USE APPLICATION FEES
To Become Effective January 1, 1991
1. Change of Zone $750.00
2. Use by Special Review $600.00
3. Major Facility of a Public $600.00
Mo UO Utility
0
N O 4. Use by Special Review Mining $600.00 - For the first ten acres plus
Permit $6.00 per acre or fraction
o W thereof in excess of 10 acres.
O 3 Fee not to exceed $2,065.00
n W 5. Use by Special Review for $4,700.00
A Solid Waste Disposal Site
C4
O and Facilities
U
N g• 6. Subdivision - Sketch Plan $400.00
M
7. Subdivision - Preliminary Plan $750.00 - For zero to 10 lots plus $7.50
cx per lot in excess of 10 lots.
W
o a Fee not to exceed $2,478.00
O\ U
N Z 8. Subdivision - Final Plat $750.00
O H
� W
N H 9. Resubdivision or Vacation $750.00
H y
a
yr • 10. Board -of Adjustment $500.00
(No fee to appeal
uMi rt.
administrative decision.)
r � Z
cal 11. Recorded Exemption $600.00
N
C)a C4 Administrative review or
County Commissioner Hearing
V' N
co N HI 12. Subdivision Exemption $300.00
H H
M G. Administrative Review or
County Commissioner Hearing
13 . Zoning Permit for Mobile Homes,
Manufactured Homes,
and Accessory Dwellings
Staff Issued $125.00
Administrative Review or $175.00
County Commissioner Hearing
Vet ire*
14. Geologic Hazard Permit $150.00
15. Flood Hazard Development Permit $150.00
16. Planned Unit Development
m0
0o V District $750.00
m0 Sketch Plan $400.00
A
o W Plan $750.00 - For zero to 50 dwelling units
0 3 or lots plus $7.50 per unit or
o W lot in excess of 50 dwelling
c] units or lots. Fee not to
exceed $2,478.00
U
W 17. Minor Subdivision $750.00
w
M
0 18. Site Plan Review $250.00
�+ x
W 19. Hazardous Waste Disposal Site $52,250.00
'04
� U
2 20. Investigation Fee An additional 50% of the
o H established application fee not
N F to exceed $375.00
H CO
An amendment to any of the above applications shall be treated as a new application
� W and will be charged the appropriate application fee.
M GL
ul
M "Z.
N Z
N r:4
O
✓ fY,
W
a
V' M
CO N
N ri
1 .-I
eel �V` '
HEARING CERTIFICATION
DOCKET NO. 90-5d_
RE: FEE SCHEDULE FOR LAND-USE PERMIT APPLICATIONS
A public hearing was conducted on November 28, 1990, at 10:00 A.M. ,
with the following present:
Commissioner Gene R. Brantner, Chairman
Commissioner George Kennedy, Pro-Tem
Commissioner Constance L. Harbert
Commissioner C.W. Kirby
Commissioner Gordon E. Lacy
Also present:
Acting Clerk to the Board, Shelly Miller
Assistant County Attorney, Lee Morrison
Planning Department representative, Chuck Cunliffe
The following business was transacted:
I hereby certify that pursuant to a notice dated November 14, 1990, and
duly published November 15, 1990, in The New News, a public hearing was
conducted to consider an increased fee schedule for fees collected by
the Weld County Department of Planning Services for processing and
reviewing land-use permit applications. Lee Morrison, Assistant County
Attorney, made this matter of record. Chuck Cunliffe, Director of
Planning Services, entered the favorable recommendation of the Planning
Commission into the record. There was no public testimony offered
concering this issue. Commissioner Lacy moved to approve the increased
fee schedule for fees collected by the Weld County Department of
Planning Services for processing and reviewing land-use permit
applications. Commissioner Kirby seconded the motion which carried
unanimously.
This Certification was approved on the 3rd day 9f December, 1990.
/� APPROVED:
�J /� /�� BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ATTEST: `/w,/1�/ ��A`J/�,/ WELD NTY, COLORAD�0yy
Weld County Clerk tV o the Board �Qe gi r,fn+
�,, /J/J /1/ ene R. Brantn r, airman
BY: \S� i
Deputy Yerk to the Board George Ken edy, Pro-�Teemm,/�
/'6ZyrsT� /s
ons ncee L. Harbe t
/1-4-7
C.W. Kir y
Go a
TAPE #90-40
DOCKET #90-54
PL0001
901191
,00 _EXHIBIT INVENTORY CONTROL SHEET
dCase d�IP -neai1d-- Ekel &n !'
Exhibit Submitted By Exhibit Description
(J P-14,-infyinidal:47O
q6B• 65-th anti
7 C. OP/A_ to � �1.1e A la f (2rp,te_v_ftt
1171.
E.
F.
G.
H.
I.
J.
R.
L.
M.
N.
0.
BEFORE THE WELD COUNTY -PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Moved by Judy Yamaguchi, that the following resolution be introduced for
passage by the Weld County Planning Commission. Re it resolved by the Weld
County Planning Commission that the proposed land-use fees be recommended
favorable to the Board o£ County Commissioners. The new fees are
recommended to become effective January 1, 1991.
Motion was seconded by Don Feldhaus.
Vote:
For Passage Against -Passage
Don Feldhaus
Judy Yamaguchi
Bud Clemons
Jerry Kiefer
The Chairman declared the resolution passed and ordered that a certified
copy with the proposed 1991 fee schedules be forwarded to the Board of
County Commissioners for further proceedings.
CERTIFICATION OF COPY
I, Sharon Ruff, -Recording Secretary of the Weld -County Planning Commission,
do hereby certify that the above and foregoing resolution is a true copy of
the Resolution of the Planning Commission of Weld County, Colorado, adopted
on November 6, 1990, and recorded in Book No. XIII of the proceedings of the
Planning Commission.
Dated the 6th of November, 1990.
Sharyn Muff
Secretary
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Docket No. 90-54
The Board of. County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, will conduct a
public hearing at 10:00 A.M. , on Wednesday, November 28, 1990, in the
Chambers of the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, Weld
County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, First Floor, Greeley, Colorado,
for the purpose of considering an increased fee schedule for fees collected
by the Weld County Department of Planning Services for processing and
reviewing land-use permit applications.
All persons in any manner interested in the proposed fee schedule are
requested to attend and may be heard.
Should any interested party desire the presence of a court reporter to make
a record of the proceedings, in addition to the taped record which will be
kept during the hearing, the Clerk to the Board's Office shall he advised in
writing of such action at least five days prior to the hearing. The cost of
engaging a court reporter shall be borne by the requesting party.
Copies of the proposed increased fee schedule are available for public
-inspection in the office of the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners,
located in the Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Third Floor,
Greeley, Colorado, Monday through Friday, N:00 A.M. to 3:00 P.M.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
BY: DONALD D. WARDEN
WELD COUNTY CLERK TO THE BOARD
BY: Shelly Miller, Deputy
DATED: November 14, 1990
PUBLISHED: November 15, 1990, in The New News
o a{ ' n7 q
STATE OF COLORADO )
)s.s.
COUNTY OF WELD )
David H. Reynolds, being -duly sworn,
says that he is publisher of
The New News, a weekly newspaper
published in Keenesburg in said County
and State; that said newspaper has a
general circulation in said County
and has been continously and
uninterruptedly published therein,
during a period of at least
fifty-two consecutive weeks prior to
the first publication of the annexed NOTICE oFPUBLIC HE
CNo�Nea�
notice; that said newspaper is a �( ty�
newspaper within the meaning of the T�t�e y,�Bwra d leld alp2
act of the General Assembly of the -lYwPeI tent
State of Colorado, entitled "An ActC ,;Mira °� a
ofW
rt
to regulate the w
printing of legal • '�1 tte
notices and advertisements, " and
amendments thereto; that the notice °� t�`
of which the annexed is a printedeWp°0
�
base penntt
copy taken from said newspaper, was
published in said newspaper, and in 'v[ewi�gMM my
the regular and entire issue of ereheZ
to
every number thereof , t __•pea o
once a week for I e reaction b the�n;;' s:
Boats e
successive weeks; that said notice „yh0�',t veaa�ya
was so published in said newspaper �ewn shell he
proper and not in any supplement att,etaicertemea
thereof , and that the first I schedule'Pere av tot
publication of said notice as to - Beetrierg
aforesaid, was on the : cattalo
(� ' 1�o��treet,
IS day of I V C1) , 19 _, Fndayca�o•�
BO%BD •
and the last on the IS lily of ,�
BY: Shelly is Deputy
19 U DDAATTE,�D:Novo r 1�is• 1980,
_in Theur ety Aewa.___
6
Subscribed and sworn to t fore
me this aro Ciday of /2,e,,.«.,.._,%„ , ,
19 /"i.) .
t•3 a
STATE OF COLORADD )
)s.s.
COUNTY OF WELD )
David B. -Reynolds, being -duly sworn ,
says that he is publisher o-f
The New News, a weekly newspaper
published in Keen-es-burg in said County
and State; that said newspaper has a
general circulation in said Countyand has been continously and
uninterruptedly published therein,
during a period of at least
fifty-two consecutive weeks prior to
the first publication -of the annexed
notice; that said newspaper is a
newspaper within the meaning of the
act of the General Assembly of the Narlf�a� k g
State of Colorado, entitled "An ActK -•,
to regulate the printing of legal
notices and advertisements, " and Favor le1 .',
amendments thereto; that the notice ey‘�colosedo�9e5.
of which the annexed is a printed ` ter
wr ,i++ru+
ropy taken -from said newspaper, was ServsIices Rrruisea''
Pr .. ;
published in said newspaper, and in i} eons°mow
the regular and entire issue of ° °fr�utliC .
every number thereof , cos melee m Weld
Center, 915 11rf
1 t °y Colorado. -Fti1�
once a week for tension+sao•
xiefer,L7tairmsn
successive weeks; that said -notice cowrypenit comints
published in the New net(
was so published in said newspaper October 25,1990 one (l) t bl
proper and not in any supplement fTBe-,N9w, News
thereof , and that the first
publication of said notice as
aforesaid, was on the r,1-5‘r,1-5‘ day of C) C , 19 i q
0
s
and the last on the day of
r
D
/2-) AJ��
Subscribed and sworn t before —
tz ui i- \'JJ
me this �o day of teen� f Y
19 217 . \ dY1U
Leea2._,,.•..i Wefd Co.-Kamm aillardWas;
IC,r ,1,4
sr
PATE: November 14 , 1990
TO: The Board of County Commissioners
Weld County, Colorado
FROM: Clerk to the Board Office
Commissioners :
If you have no objections, we have tentatively set the
following hearings for the 28th day of November, 1-990 , at
10 : 00 A.M.
Docket No. 90-53 - Amend Sections 9-3 A. (2) , 9-3 D. (2) and (4) .
and 9-3 E. (1) of the Weld County Subdivision Regulations by
changing " (c) " to " (d) " in the text
Docket No. 90-54 - lee schedule for land-use permit applications
Docket No_. 90-55 - Fee -schedules for mobile, manufactured, and
factory built home building permits , and pre-move inspections
for dwellings
OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
BY:�S/(1 P op, A' / 1 'QPA)Deputy
u
The above mentioned hearing date and hearing time may be scheduled
on the agenda as stated above.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
AWELD UNTY, COLORADO
e
19"jt
// v94._
Ski
- r
SUMMARY OF THE WELD COUNTY -PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
November 6, 1990
Page 3
all adjacent properties and public rights-of--way. Motion was seconded by
Judy Yamaguchi.
The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning
Commission for their decision on the proposed amendment. Don Feldhaus -
yes; Judy Yamaguchi - yes; Bud Clemons — yes; Jerry Keifer - yes. Motion
carried unanimously.
MOTION:
Bud Clemons motioned that Case USR-928, as amended, be submitted to the
Board of County Commissioner's.
Motion was seconded by Judy Yamaguchi.
The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members. Don Feldhaus - no;
Judy Yamaguchi - no; Bud Clemons - yes; Jerry Kiefer - yes.
Jerry Kiefer moved Case Number USR-928 for a Site Specific Development Plan
and Use by Special Review permit for an Oil and Gas Support and Service
Facility be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with .the Planning
Commission's decision as a split recommendation.
ADDITIONAL _BUSINESS:
Chuck Cunliffe, Director, -Department of Planning Services, asked the
1. Planning Commission to consider revised fee schedules for land-use
C—applications. If approved, the fees would become effective January 1, 1991.
Chuck Cunliffe asked that the staff's written recommendation be incorporated
into the record.
The chairman called for discussion from the audience. There was none.
Discussion from members of the Planning Commission followed.
Judy Yamaguchi asked how these increases in fees were figured.
Chuck Cunliffe explained that percentages vary from 4.4 up to SOA depending
on the types of activity and the costs to process the applications.
MOTION:
Judy Yamaguchi moved the Planning Commission forward the proposed
increases to land-use permit application fees to the Board of -County
Commissioners with the Planning Commission's recommendation for approval
based upon the recommendation of the Department of Planning Services' staff.
Motion seconded by Don Feldhaus.
1Q1Cli ii, lit
kh1bcr01
SUMMARY OF THE WELD COLT?TY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
November 6, 1990
Page 4
The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning
Commission for their decision. Don Feldhaus - yes; Judy Yamaguchi - yeas;
Bud Clemon - yes; Jerry Kiefer - yes. Motion -carried unanimously.
Chuck Cunliffe asked the Planning Commission to consider revised fee
schedule for mobile, manufactured, and factory built home -building permits
and pre-move inspections for dwellings. Lf approved the fees will become
effective January 1, 19a1. Chuck Cunliffe asked that the ataff's written
recommendation be incorporated into the record.
The Chairman called for -discussion from the audience. _There was none.
Discussion from members of the Planning Commission followed.
Bud Clemons asked how often the fee achedule is reviewed. Annually or
bi-annually?
Chuck Cunliffe explained that -it has become part of the -annual budget review
process for the department.
MOTION:
Judy Yamaguchi moved that the revised fee schedule for mobile,manufactured,
and factory built home building permits and pre-move inspections for
dwellings be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with the
Planning _Commissions' recommendation for approval based upon the
recommendation of the Department of Planning Services' staff.
The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Blanning
Commission for their decision. -Don Feldhaus - yes; _Judy Yamaguchi - yes;
Bud -Clemons — yes; Jerry Kiefer - yes. Motion carried unanimously.
Chuck Cunliffe asked the Planning Commission to recommend approval of the
proposed Subdivision Regulation -amendments that will correct errors
discovered when reviewing the latest amendments approved to the Weld County
Subdivision Regulations on October 17, 1990.
The Chairman called for discussion from the audience. There was none.
MOTION:
Judy Yamaguchi moved that the amendments to the Weld County Subdivision
Regulations be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with the
Planning Commissions' recommendation for approval based upon the
recommendation of the Department of planning Services' staff. Don Feldhaus
seconded the motion.
BEFORE THE WELD COUNTY BUILDING TRADES ADVISORY COMMITTBE �.
RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY 60MidiSSIONER5
Moved by Judy Yamaguchi, that the following resolution be introduced for
passage by the Weld County Planning Commission. Be it resolved by the Weld
County Planning Commission that the proposed land-use fees _be recommended
favorable to the Board of County Commissioners. The new fees are _recommended
to become effective January 1, 1990.
Motion was seconded by Don Feldhaus.
Vote:
For Passage Against Passage
Don Feldhaus
Judy Yamaguchi
Bud Clemons
Jerry Kiefer
The Chairman declared the resolution passed and ordered that a certified
copy be forwarded with the attached materials to the Board of County
Commissioners for further proceedings.
CERTIFICATION OF COPY
I, Sharyn Ruff, Recording Secretary of the Weld County Planning Commission,
do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution is a true copy of
the Resolution of the Planning Commission of Weld County, Colorado, adopted
on November 6, 1990, and recorded in Book No. XIII of the proceedings of the
Planning Commission.
`DDa�ted the 6th day of November, 1990.
T"�`ck)up *
Sharyn Ruff
Secretary
si Hir MEMORAnDUM
CTo— Pl— CDMI c on Date1 November 6, 1990
COLORADO From Chuck Cunliffe C C
subject: Land-use Application Processing Costs
Application fees should bear some relationship to the actual costs involved
in the processing of land-use and development applications. Two
philosophies exist as to who benefits and should pay for the processing of
applications. One point of view is that the applicant or resultant users
are the beneficiaries of the processing and should pay the costs associated
with the processing. Another point of view is that applicant and community
in general are the beneficiaries and that both should bear the costs of
processing with application fees and dollars collected by general taxation.
The fees recommended for 1991 were developed utilizing the philosophy that
the applicant or developer benefits the most from the approval of the
application and should pay for the processing. This philosophy has been
preferred by the majority of County Commissioners for the past several years
in Weld County. At present, the application fees charged do not cover all
of the direct and indirect costs involved in the processing of land-use and
development applications.
The attached materials indicate the amount needed to recover 100% of the
direct and indirect processing costs for each type of application and the
recommended fees for 1991. The estimated revenue if collected, will offset
approximately 42 .4% of the Department's submitted 1991 budget. The new fees
are recommended to become effective January 1, 1991.
*
4. �.n
Y W
G %
y U 14.4 w I 0 M I
H O N O • O C N N ea O O M I I I
W O O O b I
41 H N N N V V N 111 I(1 MO v110 r
NNMN N �.{ ef
+
O IFn 2
O
u % eyvI
b
ti
• 0 a u
% 1L % yp
a 0 N b 011 X 0 P'c"�
0 0 0 'O V a c �s'
O
14 U 1 N S 0 o
O
q p14 H �0 O w»� N •
O W w W H Y m
~ • •
VI a
ri O
V o CO N V
14 44 IN
w • w 0 N 0 w
W .N1 N U O 0 [L OI
W O
U w w 0 NO O N
W N p W y 4. h r-I• U
O .+ O %
V 0. O.HI 44 IN w 0 a
to
a o 0 0 0 0
O D 0 9 0 0 0 0 O 0 O O O
1y o p0 0 0 0
P M V1 10 Or c n r--i r- o o ry n
•
0 in N 4-4
O.
.41.
N
'I
• cp A
W >
Zd °0
w a 01 a o 0 O 0 O O O
COw
a O 1, b b O h CO CO CO P N M O
w o w a o o v1 a e a v w o e 1N0
O 0 N N N a H N N N • 41
H f1 r •N
0
m H
H O
a
0
o v a,0
W M TO O G W
% w . •
G • H .ti O
U W M H Nw 11 cr 0
el 0 W
q M U
U q s S 0 V b i0+
.4 o a W'U 0 1011 0
V .-I
Y yy 01
% NON N NV 0$V+ C
.I O 0 O
Y O $ 0
0 O
w 0 W Y
• W O N H 01 w w
w 10 W Y 140g0
N 0
11 N U 0 i
Y 1< c N W 'O N W O
W
0 VI 11 a W 11 H W 11 H v••
O .1S W
P.
0 w Eh..4 w w° a 0.N 0 0
Co o 0
c o o o 0 0 0 O O o o 0 0
•.1.• 0 0 0 0 0 .
N o O O O N 0 O 0 o O O O
'!l D V1 V1 In M b $ O d in o 1!1
Cg
y vH
a
0
c V
V4 0 W
V .1 E co .r1 N
G H
0 +I 1 1 H C w N t
V .I -0 W 0
M O •Y .Ye1 .4 .1 0 O N
S U N. .N W c 0i>, 0: 4 IN
N H M
% 0 W q V W V
w a 0. TO TI N O M
q q 01
C
a °i a a '-2
6 a c o 01 0
Hri q .H •n W U •r •y 0 t W n
> > > V Y .i g W
0 0 0 44 a a v, .14 N ti » g 0 9 b .%i
m 11 4.%4. W e6
q M q q N I I � A %O Uj 0
W 1 C Y Ja % U
u $' v w °%' & 0 0 O � �$ o o c w u;
D• Ul 7U M va! +1 % N 'r1 •r1 .•4 N q M w O
w G w 0 .ti '•1 •.1 r1 w rV 04440-100
•J .-1 Y
• .C A 00 A >' > > > 'O b > NG WNU
.0 W -n +1 .rl 14 HI
• N W •n W W m ,bp .0 y 0 yO •'C1 E to O
R o f b b ',.q+ O N a a q N
W Y
G m
ii4 44
U W Y + JV M M OP M
0 14 0 0 N O O •
03 0 c • •
o • L O N O O 7
„ N in
N N N N a 0 N A 0. • • • •
G •
p m
NB t
'� �) IO
C Ul • Im• r Gn .0 q
c •• m a V O M F -N m"'.
...4N y p ry w• '•� N 1
3 a u 0 u 0 0 m m W'
•O.4 +yi W O N 00 .-4 SO -pi u W N W
D W a O .mi u 'O lL % G 0 V S.
O 0 q v C o m 0 'a om V a m
W ~„i N ✓ 0 m s t) m 0
la?
0X .-im rn .0A W .-4 ..
y G M tii SV3 G .ti OO NN Y 'O'.I .i Gbp-1p U .UM .pl y W y ym N io.;030
W O �� b W 4 0 44 b g b
O o 0 0 p OO O O M U Y
O O O . O O O O W o wt un OOo ,� ,� 0 0 o y0
y .l .i V N r n r n N b ,gi ri
p0p ,
in 2 0 Y
N W
m A M
Y Y
0 M H a
W
RI m m 0
0 0 m O O O U G 0
Z ym O O O 0 0 O A O D O G
m W O N N N o o p A m 0
W0 SP O W N H a C 'com •
_ b O •
✓p U U m
0 0 . V P O O O N 'YO Y N
� .1 N .i N N N O 0 m � W
H O cn 14 N H Si A U
W M y S
1 Mq SiN N
0 0 ai o a W P .a
ao
.i N m� O 1'1 0• .1 .{ -1
y A N
-1 00 Hm O 0 4 Y N W
m m N O m G O m V
b O.-• 0 0 O M u m u N
W m m y am
O M .-f Y N V N O 0 V 0'O
p N 0
to W W 5 0 o W N W N a;
Y m 2
40w .y Hs '4
rn a o 0
0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 $ .0 .0 M W
W h o O 0 p °' p m
_.� N O O in p O 0 D 0 m T a q
X .1 .1 ry �O tO 4 N 0 u 0 G
N :0
"' x
o ✓
.ti
Ifi
co. -00 M N Y. Pr
Aj
a p 9 W
Y m m
>� m $y
44
> m
4 O 14 pi .� -no
Y m
e m m A
LO H W m W
'O N 0 yGy N �' m m lj
m Y 8 m m , g
w 44 ."1_,
01 ° u $ m -8 s
m > -0 0 Y s N w rm
m .0 > m o s m
o m Od O 0 N W
4Nj w ✓ x .,., 0
m q'O 0 m N 0 m "H > m G .�
U rig S S M W H Kp g ..0j gN N 'CO e
w 0 "+.44 n r Co b U --I
s 2 ; 0� C N W N
O W O '0 m J� Mg V) W '� g W M A
Mo t b .Ni O C X .ti .mi O Y A Y CN N m O
F m Y W W N O Or G W N [ R fu .0 G ti
E 0 ai H
PLANNING DEPARTMENT COST ANALYSIS - EXPENSES COMPARE➢ WITH REVENUE GENERATED
1 9 90 THROUGH 9 ! 30 / 9 0
STAFF % NEEDED TO
ACTIVITIES HOURS ACTUAL INDIRECT COST TOTAL COST REVENUE NET COST Z UNDER BREAK EVEN
@ 227.245
REVENUE 3,864.50 41.21% 86,266.58 196,032.19 282,298.77 81.363.00 (200.935.71} -71.18% 346.9,%
NON-REVENUE 5,513.50 58,79% 123,076.94
TOTAL 9,378,00 209,343.52
1989
STAFF % NEEDED TO
ACTIVITIES HOURS ACTUAL INDIRECT COST TOTAL COST REVENUE NET COST % UNDER BREAK EVEN
@ 227.24%
REVENUE 5,300.25 42.262 108,079.63 245,600.16 353,679.79 85.609.00 (268.070.79) -75.79% 413.13%
NON-REVENUE 7,242.00 57.742 147,674.68
TOTAL 12.542.25 255,754.71
1988
STAFF % NEEDE➢ TO
ACTIVITIES HOURS ACTUAL INDIRECT COST TOTAL COST REVENUE NET COST % UNDER BREAK EVEN
@ 188.75%
REVENUE 5,694.25 44.60% 118,321.91 223,332.60 341,654.51 75,789.65 (265,864.86) -77.82% 450.79%
NON-REVENUE 7,072.25 55.40% 146,955.63
TOTAL 12,766.5+ 265,277.54
1 87
STAFF 7. NEEDED 1O
ACTIVITIES HOURS ACTUAL INDIRECT COST TOTAL COST REVENUE NET COST % UNDER BREAK EVEN
@ 212.60%
REVENUE 5,214.75 40.84% 90,942.76 193,344.30 284,287.06 68,951.00 (215,336.06) -75.75% 412.30%
NON-REVENUE 7.554.75 59.16% 131,751.24
TOTAL 12,769,50 222,694.00
PLANNING DEPARTMENT COST ANALYSIS - EXPENSES COMPARED WITH REVENUE GENERATED
1986
STAFF % NEEDED TO
ACTIVITIES HOURS ACTUAL INDIRECT COST TOTAL COST REVENUE NET COST % UNDER BREAK EVEN
8 241.19%
REVENUE 5,038.75 36.1E% 79,069.26 190,707.15 269,776.42 64,821.00 (204,955.42) -75.97%. 416.19%
NON-REVENUE 8,888.00 63.82% 139,472.61
TOTAL 13,96.75 218,541.87
1985
STAFF
NEEDED TO
ACTIVITIES HOURS ACTUAL INDIRECT COST TOTAL COST REVENUE NET COST % UNDER BREAK EVEN
8 168.8%
REVENUE 3,941.•75 22.477. 53,505.53 90,317.33 143,822.86 61,051.00 (82,771.86) -5.7.55% 235.585
NON-REVENUE 13,602.75 77,53% 184,644.47
TOTAL 17,544.50 238,150.00
1984
STAFF 1. NEEDED TO
ACTIVITIES HOURS ACTUAL INDIRECT COST TOTAL COST REVENUE NET COST % UNDER BREAK EVEN
@ 203.3%
REVENUE 5,038.00 36,51% 67,987.76 138,219.12 206,206.88 34,486.00 (171,720.88) -83.28% 597.94%
NON-REVENUE 9,760.75 63.49% 118,226.24
TOTAL 13,.798,75 186,214.00
198 _
STAFF % NEEDED TO
ACTIVITIES HOURS ACTUAL INDIRECT COST TOTAL COST REVENUE NET COST % UNDER BREAK EVEN
8 167.6%
REVENUE 4,777.70 34.32% 62,057.24 104,007.94 166,065.18 28,670.00 (137.395.18) -82.74% 579.23%
NON-REVENUE 9,142.30 65.68% 118,748.76
TOTAL 13,920.00 180,806.00
LAND-USE APPLICATION FEE COMPARISONS
August 6, 1990
CHANGE OF ZONE
Adams County $225
Arapahoe $833 + $445 + $63 x square root of acres.
Processed as PHD.
Boulder County $1,000
Colorado Springs $175
$130 if in conformance with approved master
plan.
Douglas County $150 mandatory pre-appplication review fee.
Residential: $300 base fee plus $10/acre if
0-100 acres; $9 per acre if 100-320 acres; $8
-per acre of 320-640 acres; $7 per acre if
640-1,000 acres; $6 per acre if 1,000 or more
acres.
Nonresidential: $300 base fee plus $50 per
acre if 0-100 acres; $40 per acre if 10-25
acres; $30/acre if 25-50 acres; $25/acre if
50-100 acres; $20 per acre if more than 100
acres.
El Paso County $175 (Agricultural zoning $125)
Greeley $100
Jefferson County $200 0-10 acres. $70 times square root of
acreage in excess of 10 acres.
Larimer County $155 plus $10 sign posting fee.
Loveland $125
Morgan County Agricultural, Residential: 0-25 acres: $100;
25-250 acres: $4 per acre; 250-500 $1,000 plus
$2 per acre; in excess of 500 acres: $1,500
plus $1 per acre. Multifamily, Business,
Commercial, Economic Development, Industrial:
same plus 10%.
Weld County $600 plus recording fee.
2
USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW
Adams County $225 Conditional Use; $125 -Special Use.
Arapahoe County $232
Boulder County $1,700 (Group Care Center $600) ,
Colorado Springs $115
Douglas County $250
El Faso County $115
Greeley $100
Jefferson County $200 0-10 acres. $70 times square root of
acreage in excess of 10 acres.
Larimer County $155 plus $10 sign posting fee and $20 vested
right lee.
Loveland $110
Morgan County $450 plus all actual costs faith no upper
limit.
Weld County $500 plus recording fee.
Mining
Adams County $225, Colorado Soil Conservation $325,
Environmental Services $200, Hazardous Waste
and C.D.- $300 plus $25 for sign and postage.
Arapahoe County $300 (Processed as a Special RevieW permit) .
Boulder County $2,700
Colorado Springs Does not exist.
Douglas County $250
E1 Paso County $250 0,10 -acres, $500 more than 10 acres.
Greeley Does not exist.
Jefferson County X1,000 for regular operation; $600 for limited
impact operations (defined in Colorado Mined
Land Reclamation Act: Article 32 of Title 34
C.R.S.) $600 for renewal of same case and
enforcement of $300.
a '_ .11e
3
Ndning (Cont.)
Larimer County $155 plus $10 sign posting fee, plus $20
vested right.
Loveland Does not Exist.
Morgan County Same as USR.
Weld County $50O up to 10 acres plus _recording fee. Over
10 acres: add $5 per acre. Fee not to Exceed
$1,300.
Recorded Exemption (RE)/Subdivision Exemption (SF)
Adams County $100 (RE) .
Arapahoe County $531 for residential. $531 + $1,650 +
$75/acre for nonresidential.
Boulder County $350
Colorado Springs $115
Douglas County $250 "Minor development" (4 lots or less) .
E1 Paso County $60 (SE) $75 minor subdivision (4 lots or
less) .
Greeley Does not exist.
Jefferson County $100 plus $100 for each new building site plus
recording lee (3 lots or less) .
Larimer County $50 per lot (minor land division) plus
recording fee.
Loveland $100 "Minor subdivision" (3 lots or less) .
Morgan County $350 plus all actual costs with no upper
limit. Boundary line adjustment $200 plus all
actual costs.
Weld County $450 plus recording fee for RE, -$250 for SE.
Board of Adjustment Variance
Adams County $125
Arapahoe County $40 (regular meeting) or $240 (special
meeting) .
-'@ 1 )w
4
Board of Adjustment (cont.)
Boulder County $600
Colorado Springs $60 - If appealed to City Council, $113.
Douglas County $250
El Paso County $35
Greeley $100
Jefferson County $100
Larimer County $93
Loveland $25
Morgan County $35 plus advertising costs.
Weld County $325 (No fee to appeal administrative
decision.)
Subdivision Sketch Plan
Adams County Does not exist. General Development Plan (two
step -process, preliminary and final) .
Arapahoe County Does not exist.
Boulder County $1,300 - 7 lots or less.
$1,800 - more than 7 lots.
Colorado Springs $115 - 100 acres or less.
$290 - lU0 to 500 acres.
$470 - over 500 acres.
Douglas County $250
E1 Paso County $175 - 100 acres or less.
$290 - 100-500 acres.
$470 - over 500 acres.
Greeley No Charge.
Jefferson County Does not exist.
Larimer Canty $68 (Concept Technical Review) .
Loveland No charge for pre-application conference.
$225 Nuth annexation.
r '; y cll y
5
Subdivision Sketch Plan (cont.)
Morgan County $500 plus all actual costs (12 lots or less.)
Weld County $350
Subdivision Preliminary Plan
Adams County $250 plus $5 per lot in Commercial/Industrial
or $.50 per lot in Residential.
Arapahoe County $550 + $660 + $75 x square root of acres.
Processed as a PUD.
Boulder County $1,000
Colorado Springs $115
Douglas County Residential: $300 base fee plus $20 per
dwelling unit: 0-100 units; $10 per dwelling
unit: 100-500 -units; $5 per -dwelling unit:
500-1,000 units; $2.50 per dwelling unit: over
1,000 units.
Nonresidential: $300 base fee plus $25 per
gross acre.
E1 Paso County $75 plus administrative plot plan fee of $115.
Greeley No charge.
Jefferson Canty Residential: $12/dwelling unit if 0-100 units
($100 minimum) ; if 100-500 dwelling units,
then $1,200 base fee, plus $10/unit in excess
of 100 units; if 500-1,000 dwelling units,
then $5,200 base fee plus $b/unit in excess of
500 units; if more than 1,000 units, then
$8,200 base fee And $2/unit in-Pxcyss of 1,000
units.
Commercial/Industrial $275 times square root
of acreage.
If done concurrently with final plat, one
payment only.
Iarimer Canty $210 plus $10 sign posting fee, and a $20
vested right fee.
2C,.:„ gay
.. .... ...
6
Subdivision Preliminary Plan (cont.)
Loveland $250 plus $2/lot. If done concurrently with
Final Plat, the higher of the two fees is
charged.
Morgan County $500 up to 50 units, $5.00 per unit over 50
plus all actual costs with no upper limit.
Weld County $600 for 0-50 dwelling units or lots plus $5
per unit or lot an excess of 50 dwelling units
or lots. Fee not to exceed $1,500.
Subdivision Final Plat
Adams County One fee at preliminary stage.
Arapahoe County $550 + $1,340 + $110 x square root of acres.
Processed as PUD.
Boulder County $1,500
Colorado Springs $115
Douglas County $250
E1 Pasu County $75
Greeley $100
Jefferson County Residential: 0-100 dwelling units: $12 per
unit, $100 minimum; 100-500 dwelling units:
$1,200 plus $10 per unit in excess of 100;
500-1,000 dwelling units: $5,200 plus $6 per
unit in excess of 500; over 1,D00 dwelling
units: $8,200 plus $2 per unit in excess of
1,000 units.
Ccamerci.al/Industrial: $275 times square root
of acreage.
If done concurrently with preliminary plan,
one payment only.
Lar;mer County $200 plus recording fee plus ,12 per lot in
excess of 20 lots plus recording fee.
Loveland $375 plus $2 per lot.
Morgan County $500 plus all actual costs with no upper
limit.
Weld County $600 plus recording fee.
�1. -, �r
7
Planned Unit Development
Adams County $200 plus $5 per lot in Cauvercial/Industrial
or $_.30 per unit in Residential.
Arapahoe County $830 planning fee. ^x508 minimum engineering
fee; sliding scale increasing with project
size.
Boulder County ICD processed as a subdivision.
Colorado Springs $115 Development Plan.
Douglas County 4300 base fee
$500 Development guide xeview fee
$100 tevelopment plan review fee, plus 0-100
acres: $30 per acre; 100-320 acres: $25 per
acre; 320-640 acres: $20 per acre; 640-1,000
acres: $15 per acre; aver 1,000 acres: $10 per
acre.
E1 Paso County Fees associated individually with zoning,
preliminary plan, and final plat.
Greeley $100 plus recording fee.
Jefferson County $200 0-10 acres. $70 times square soot in
excess of 10 acres.
Larimer County Plaster: $210 plus $10 sign posting fee.
Preliminary: $210 plus $10 sign posting fee.
Final: $200 plus recording fee plus $2 per
lot in excess of 20 lots plus $20 vested right
fee - Same steps as Subdivision.
Loveland -Piaster: $225 plus $2 per unit
Preliminary: $225 plus $2 Ter unit
Final: $400 plus $2 per unit
Combined, only the higher fee is charged.
Morgan Not available at this time.
Weld County Sketch plan: $350
District: $600
Plan: $600 for 0-50 dwelling units or lots,
plus $5 per unit or lot in excess of 50
dwelling units or lots. Fee not to exceed
$1,500.
Douglas County has adopted a $500 fee for applications which initiates a
vested right in addition to the regular application fee.
iarimer County has adopted a $20 fee for applications which initiates a
vested right in addition to the regular application fee.
sdl .;; � ;)-n
0
r
HI W
U) d
W 0 0 0 0 0 N N O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
W a 0000 N N O O O o N in O N 0 0 -O b O N in
N O N d' rl H O 10 a[1 V r IN N r 0 0 in M 111 IN N
ro
o a) H H H 01 CO CO CO H H vI N SO N H MO
•
0'
a 21N H
LO N I II II II 11 II II II II II II 11 II II II II II II 11 II 11 CO. 4.1 law
id J
g 0 0 0 0 N N 0 0 0 00000 000 -0 -00 •I
H a r � tO Or ri rri e r r O N N N r- O O O N HI N it
<i' r rrr IpMNHHN CO
m m, m, m, .r m, m, m, m,,B, m, OW OW ®,T9.1 m, � CV � m, 40
Iiil
H N N N to N N N N N H H H N H M O M N O N O O
M SO r C11 N H el I•d' W
N M
0
m v �
W M
HI a
HI
1, 0000 O O O O O 0000 -0 0000000 N CO
N CO 0000 O N N N N U100 _00 00 (.10000 -rli ter
W 0 N N O O N N r N N M ID LID N ID r 0 SD N0 9 b
0 a H IN H 01 ID H H H H N N HHM CO a) H
a H H [p -a) 0 0
N G
w
II II II II 11 a n a 11 a II a II II II II a a a a S
t.
W i.4 CU 2O D b 0 0 0 O o 0 O O O O D A O N O on p
a H -O D O O O in in O O OOOOO N N N O O O
H a 10 N N N H H CO SO M Yet 1/40 1/40 1/40 10 'cl' N M H H N NI 01
01 4:2J M) @, V' @, ®, oz) @, QV D, tv C9, @, ell @, @, @, 0, @, m, •r1 H
01 _
H N MN @, N N N N N H H H N H N O 1(1 N O N - O
M 1p r 01 N H HI<F CO CO N
W M
N W H
rn al
.fitI
HEl H
W a tP 04 0 N Oo1
i)
HI Wa a' r-1N H SD N -O-I) O O O O H O O V M O C' 0 01 H NCn
H
ZM N CO H H H V' H-4
W N 0 p
Ch
b 0 CO 0'1
o
H 1.4-.0 H
H O N Cl
0
05, y N N 0
al r. O O O D o o D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O U
O N O O O O in in O-o 0 _0000 O O N D 0 0 N H O N
•H) .- o O in N N r 0 0 r 10 M SD N N N NN O OH H U)
i
W N M O N 0 H H M M H 01 NCO H M 01 O O-,C
W O M H C N U Cr)
0 a1
O
0 1) II II II II II II II 11 II II 11 II II II II II II II II W H
O o 0 0 0 -O o O o o -O O OO1114OOO C 4)
0 0 O O O O N N O D N O -0 D O N N N -0 00 0 0
CU 1.4 0
{L' H N N H H M1/4O SD M lD 10 0 0 V' N M H H N
o 0 m, az Ys, m, tQ, au v, m, az m, a m, m, WOW a m, m,m 4) N D
Hi
01 N N N N in N H H N YV o 0 o N D N I N W 0 0
01 in O in AD r ri CO H H H eH 0) 0
H Sp
U +) H
AI N
U N
>,• I 0
W la H O
W N
3
W r0G a) ca N
0 a)
Hi
0 0 I ero I 0 ) 0 e m
a CC ] a) a a
HI a a � v4) ro d 4) ro ro
H ci 0 0 H 0 N g b NI 14 11 al O W 0 b •; b b 0
W N U .�r1 M U W 1, H b b C) •n N re 0 H W
za Y. H 0 M Cro N HD: W a
a 0-cc N � U H 0 0.1 04 y W 04M b •.i H I
<. W a N C� >I 4 HI •- E. 1
I-1 A 1 HI N a 0 ro
O-U) 'a7 H h' w Y U -H V] U •.4 H ro H RJ m w U ro W N 1.1 o
W 0 a W 0 i.) 1) 0 H y) H YC HO 0 HI A •r1 Z H W O alN >1O 1 b+ W N 0 a N wit a 0 0 G a c ro > a at E-I ra
ICP a G O \ 4) O M •H H H .N H •rl 0 •r1 H •H ro O •U
41 a •e1 a MU) U U) alai CatoaaIN .'F., O� HH O a' ^ ^
04) 0U)0 W $ 01 r.U 0 A N t]i) N O ON v v v
IM N Pa V' k. U)
CASE -TYPE BY PERCENTAGE
1988
TOTAL # % OF TOTAL
COZ 4 1.2
USR (1) 62 18.1
PUD (2) 10 2.9
SUB (3) 6 1.8
SE 26 7-6
ZPMH/MHZP/ZPAD (4) 132 38.6
RE 86 25.1
BOA (5) 5 1.5
FH 11 5.8
342 100.08
1989
TOTAL # % OF TOTAL
COZ 2 .5
USR (1) 37 11.0
PUD (2) 8 2.4
SUB (3) 6 1.8
SE 22 65
ZPMH/MHZP/ZPAD (4) 137 40.8
RE 100 -29,8
BOA (5) 5 1.5
FH 19 5.7
336 100.08
1990 through 9/30/90
TOTAL # % OF TOTAL
COZ 1 .4
USR (1) 2.8 12.0
PUD (2) 4 1.8
SUB (3) 1 .4
SE 14 6.0
ZPMH/MHZP/ZPAD (4) 88 37.8
RE 8U 34.3
BOA (5) 3 1.3
FH 14 6.0
233 100.08
(1) Inclndes Mining and Major Facility o£ Public Utilities.
(2) Includes PUD Sketch, District, and Plan.
(3) Includes Sketch, Preliminary, Final, and Resubdi.vision.
(4) Includes Staff, Administrative Review, and_Board of County
Commissioners.
(5) Includes Variances and Appeals of_Administrative decisions.
, :),4
Hello