The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About9317241 1 '1 `I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 PLAT NOTE REQUIREMENTS q "l ?4Q i 1 e I PLAT NOTE REQUIREMENTS All plat note requirements have been adequately addressed as documented by the following attachments. a) Letter from Weld County Sheriff, Ed Jordan. Exhibit Item A attached. b) Refer to Requirement No. 9 in above response c) Refer to Requirement No. 9 in above response d) Refer to Architects/Engineers Site Plans Al and C3 e) A future vehicular road access point from the twenty-two acre site north property line shall be considered at a future date. Refer to Architects/Engineers Site Plans Al and C3 f) An access easement shall be provided at the north side of the Kahn Sub- division when developed, which will not effect said subdivision. g/h) Refer to Nelson Engineers Addendum Report to Fort Junction traffic impact study - Exhibit Item g/h attached. MasterPlan/Off Site Road Improvements Plat Notes i) Refer to Nelson Engineers Master Drainage Plan for proposed Site Development - Architectural Drawing Sheet C3. 1) Refer to Nelson Engineer Response Letter - Exhibit J attached. Refer to letter to Nelson Engineers from Norman Wells, Jr., District Conser- vationist, U.S. Department of Agriculture. k) Refer to Letter from Mountainview Fire Protection District - Exhibit Item K attached. 911 ?:t9 1 Refer to Nelson Engineers Site Plan - Architectural Drawing Sheet C3. i .1 1 ..1 1 I 1 I I I I I I) A Site Plan review will be filed in the future. m) Refer to Nelson Engineers' Letter to Rural Ditch Company - Exhibit Item M attached. 931249 1 i 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 TI I PLAT NOTE ATTACHMENTS EXHIBIT ITEM A 1 IGREELEY OFFICE 910 10TH AVENUE GREELEY, CO 80631 • PHONE (303)356.4015 I FAX (303) 353.8551 1 1 1 1 ,�F�GE OF THE Sti O Mr. John T. Coppom, Administrator The Villa At Greeley, Inc. 1750 Sixth Avenue Greeley, CO. 80631 Dear John, ED JORDAN August 18, 1993 FORT LUPTON SUB STATION P.O. BOX 123 FORT LUPTON, CO 80621 PHONE (303) 3564015 EXT. 46J0 (303) 857.2465 This letter is in regards to your efforts to establish a pre -parole facility in the Del Camino area. The Weld County Sheriff's Office is responsible to provide routine law enforcement services in that area and we are prepared to meet any demands your facility would require, as per our previous discussions. In my opinion, the area can be adequately covered by the Weld County Sheriff's Office and a separate law enforcement authority is not required to police the Del Camino area. We would certainly be amiable to working out contractual agreements and letters of agreement. on a number of details related to the pre -parole facility including: Law enforcement assistance in the event of a work stoppage or a major internal disruption. • Assistance from our Office of Emergency Management in the development of an emergency response plan for the facility. • Contractual arrangements for regressions from the pre -parole facility, and their impact on the Weld County Jail, and what procedures will be established for moving Department of Corrections inmates/parolees out of our jail and into a state institution. Again, good luck with your proposal. I look forward to working with the Villa and the development of these plans for the facility. Sine ED ORDAN S ERIFF WELD COUNTY 1 9;`1`'49 EXHIBIT ITEM G/H RECEIVED AUG .2 3 1993 Del Camino Prerelease Center Traffic Impact Study Weld County, CO Prepared For: Nelson Engineers 822 7th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Prepared By; Eugene G. Coppola P. O. Box 2600027 Littleton, CO 80126-0027 303-792-2450 August 20, 1993 921249 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS Roadway Surrounding Area' Traffic Volumes FUTURE CONDITIONS, 3 Roadway 3 Surrounding Area 4 Traffic Volumes 4 SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC 5 Trip Generation 5 Site Access S Distribution of Site Generated Traffic 6 Impact of Site Traffic 6 DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS 7 CONCLUSIONS 8 qdwfl9 c: INTRODUCTION Del Camino Prerelease Center is a proposed development for the first filing of the Fort Junction PUD. It will be situated on the northern 22 acres of the site. Its precise location is in the southeast corner of CR 24.5 and the east 1-25 frontage road in Weld County, Colorado (See Figure 1). The facility will be operational in 1994. This study addresses the traffic impacts of the proposed facility and specifically reviews and investigates the following items: > Collect and determine current roadway geometry, traffic volumes, and operating conditions. > Determine peak -hour site generated traffic and assign this traffic to the available roadways. > Identify future traffic volumes and roadway condi- tions. > Investigate operating levels -of -service and roadway geometry at site driveways and key intersections. > Determine mitigation measures to lessen the impact of site traffic as appropriate. Each of the above items is discussed in the following sec- tions of this report. EXISTING CONDITIONS Roadway The site is situated in the southeast corner of CR 24.5 and the east 1-25 frontage road. CR 24.5 is a gravel roadway 9Z12,19 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 Terry rr'Lake Ufa Rd. 0 V N MEAD CR ii SH 66 2_ McIntosh re Lake ,• a L ON 3MON,i•:. co Mineral Rd. Panama Res, ti `1.J.) 1 I ;��Calklns ~I 3 ".)lake J ‘,.1 Cr SH 119 ,) I t It Z Ir J O 140 O Co W / O 0J n - t • 3./ r° / 1 A07 ...Ja▪ sper Rd. N ERIE r SH 52 *SITE C. CR 24 CR 6 FIRESTONE FREOERICK OACONO O Figure 1 VICINITY MAP 9^'9 719 extending east from the I-25 frontage road. The frontage road presently has one travel lane in each direction and serves approximately 500 vehicles per day. The frontage road intersects CR 24 approximately 100 feet east of the CR24/SH119 intersection with I-25. The posted speed limit on the east frontage road is 55 miles per hour. 1 1 1 1 1 County Road (CR) 24 is a two lane paved roadway extending from I-25 to the east. It is a continuation of State High- way (SH) 119 which runs from 1-25 west to and through Long- mont. Currently daily traffic on CR 24 is some 2300 vehi- cles per day. Suioypging Area The site is currently used for agricultural uses as are the surrounding areas. For the most part, the area east of 1-25 is used for agricultural purposes or vacant land. Several miles to the west of I-25 lies the City of Longmont. Imme- diately west of I-25, along the west frontage road, there are commercialized areas including several fast food establishments. Traffic Vojumes Recent peak -hour traffic volumes were extracted from the Felsburg, Holt b Ullevig study. That study addresses only afternoon peak -hour conditions. The logic behind this is uncertain; however, it is assumed that the morning peak -hour is minor or insignificant compared to the afternoon peak - hour. Given the activity associated with the business on the west side of 1-25' and the lack of development to the east of I-25, it is reasonably safe to assume morning peak - hour conditions are insignificant. Recent afternoon peak - hour traffic volumes at key locations are presented on Figure 2. 2 9?1219 1 1 .1 1 1 1 1 1 1 (xxx) Daily Traffic Figure 2 CURRENT PM PEAK -HOUR TRAFFIC 931249 1 1 FUTURE CONDITIONS Roadw 'I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 Major roadway improvements are anticipated beginning in 1995. These improvements are represented in the Del Camino Interchange Alternatives Analysis study prepared by Fels - burg, Holt b Ullevig in November, 1991. The recommended improvements are being implemented by the Colorado Depart- ment of Transportation (CDOT). The essence of these im- provements are; 1. Changing the two-way ramp/frontage road in the southwest quadrant of the interchange to one-way operation. 2. Construction of a new roadway connecting Turner Boulevard to the on -ramp and the west frontage road. 3. Relocation of the east frontage road inter- section with CR 24 to a point some 600 feet further east. 4. Construction of a new east frontage road starting at its intersection with CR 24 and extending some 1800 feet to the north and south. This frontage road will have one travel lane in each direction. Construction activity is anticipated to stop just south of the site. 5. Spot intersection improvements to provide appropriate laneages for future traffic volumes. At the CR 24 - east frontage road 3 I 9J &249 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 intersection, a through lane and a left -turn lane in, each direction as well as a south- bound to westbound right -turn lane will be provided.. roundit,'lg Area The proposed prerelease center will initiate development in the northeast quadrant of the I-25/CR 24 interchange. Other developments will likely follow. This and other develop- ments have been accounted for in the Felsburg. Holt, & Ullevig study. The development assumptions for that study were consistent with the North Front Range (NFR) Model developed by CDOT. The area surrounding the Del Camino interchange from approximately throe (3) miles west of 1-25 to one mile east of 1-25 and one-half mile each side of $14 119/CR 24 is expected to support substantial development by the year 2010. 'S.S.a £ f i,c V o1. uwcs., As stated earlier, significant development is expected in the area of the Del Camino interchange by the year 2010. The proposed prerelease center is within the bounds of the Del Camino area and is included in the development projec- tions. Design year conditions identified as those occurring in the year 2010 were evaluated as part of the Felsburg, Holt s Ollevig study. Accordingly, this time horizon is assumed to represent local area build out at the Del Camino interchange. Afternoon peak -hour traffic volume projec- tions, also referred to as design hour traffic volume pro- jections, are shown on Figure 3. 4 1 1 1 1 .1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ,1 Legend: (xxx) - Daily Traffic Figure 3 2010 PM PEAK -HOUR TRAFFIC I 9 19+q 1 .1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 �1 1 SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC Trip Generation The proposed prerelease facility is a unique land use indig- enous only to itself. Accordingly, the Institute of Trans- portation Engineers' CITE), "Trip Generation" publication does not address this specific land use. It does address prison facilities but the data is very limited (two studies) and caution is recommended due to the very limited sample size. Anticipated traffic volume projections were developed intu- itively given the estimated 110 employees covering three (3) work shifts. Administrative employees were assumed to work the daytime and evening shifts with the balance of the employees being security and support services personnel. The following trip end projections appear appropriate during the highest shift change peak -hour; Peak -Hour. AM PM Trip Esidi_ La 9SS� 30 15 15 30 A quick cross reference check with the prison land use presented in the ITE publication revealed that the above trip generation volumes are consistent, if not higher, than the ITE published rates/volumes. S,.ite ASgega As presently planned, access to the prerelease center will be via two private drives from the east frontage road. 5 ii 1 1 These driveways are anticipated to receive relatively bal- anced use given the parking layout and building access points. Distribution of Site Generated Trfjc, The directional distribution of site generated traffic indicates the general path by which access to and from the site is achieved. The location of the project within or in relation to an urban area and the available roadway network are primary factors in determining the overall directional distribution. In this instance, traffic is expected to arrive and depart the site in the percentages indicated below. It should be noted that this distribution recognizes the available road- way system. For example, a vehicle might be travelling to the site from the Denver metro area; however, it must travel east on CR 24 prior to turning north on the east 1-25 front- age road. An approximation of this directional distribution of site traffic is shown on Figure 4. 1 1 Impact of Site Traffic As previously mentioned, the area surrounding and including the site was assumed to be fully developed when design year traffic volumes were estimated for the Del Camino inter- change project. Accordingly, site generated traffic has been accounted for even though the site was probably antici- pated for use as a higher traffic generator. To as- sess/confirm operations during the 2010 design year, capaci- ty analyses were conducted under PM peak-hour/design hour conditions. Traffic volumes used for these analyses are presented on Figure 5. As shown on Figure 5, site traffic volumes and overall traffic volumes on the east side of the I-25 interchange are relatively moderate. Operating condi- 6 I 931249 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 .7/ (25%) Legend: AM Pk-Hr/PM Pk -Hr (xx%) - Directional Distribution eN t� v N o IL r I;, Q� AL 0/1 7/14 1/1 27/14 - f 0 Figure 4 PEAK -HOUR SITE TRAFFIC (7%) 1 '1 i .1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I Legend: looc/coc - site/total I G O IL 20/685 1/30 +-- 0/465 r- 0/20 14/270 0/515 0/185 -I\ _N O c O Figure 5 2010 PM PEAK -HOUR TRAFFIC • 931249 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I tions, expressed as levels -of -service (LOS), were calculated as indicated on the following page. _Intersection Frontage Rd - Site Drives Frontage Rd - CR 24 Direction - Movement Control LCS WB - LT Stop C WB - RT Stop A SB - LT -- A ES EB WE WB NB NB SB SB SB - LT Signal B • TH Signal - LT Signal A - TH Signal C - LT Signal C - TR Signal B - LT Signal B - TH Signal B - RT Signal B Overall Intersection B As indicated above, all movements are expected to operate at very acceptable levels -of -service under 2010 design peak - hour conditions. It should be noted that traffic signal installation at the CR 24 - Frontage Road intersection was anticipated in the Del Camino interchange study. This signal will be installed when warranted. It should be noted that the traffic signal will be needed whether or not the prerelease center is built. DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS To assess the need for auxiliary lanes at the site drive- ways, the Colorado Department of Transportation publication, "The State Highway Access Code" was reviewed. The results of this review at each driveway are as noted on the follow- ing page. 7 971749 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 :1 1 I 1 Required ? South Drive North Drive Improvement Current 2010 u nt s -?_L RT deceleration lane No Yes No RT acceleration lane Nos No No LT deceleration lane No No No No No No LT acceleration lane No No No No As indicated above, a right -turn deceleration lane is re- quired per the access code for traffic entering the prere- lease facility under 2010 conditions. In this instan,:e, site traffic is considered negligible; however, background traffic on the frontage road is expected to grow to the point where right -turn deceleration lanes becomes warranted when 100 vehicles per hour are travelling in one direction on the frontage road. When this is likely to occur is somewhat difficult to assess; however, if growth (and traf- fic volumes) were to increase in a straight line from 1991 to 2010, the 100 vehicles per hour threshhold will be reached in 1996. When constructed, the right turn deceleration lane should be 485 feet long with a minimum taper of 12.5:1. Right turn storage is not considered necessary given the minimal site traffic volumes. CONCLUSIONS Based upon the foregoing analyses and investigations, the following conclusions can be made: 1. Site generated traffic is minimal and is not expected to produce a noticeable reduction in traffic operations. 8 9Y.1'9 2. The proposed interchange improvement at the I-25/SH 119 interchange takes into account significant growth in traffic volumes re- sulting from development on this and sur- rounding sites. 3. Current traffic volumes on the east side of the 1-25/SH 119 interchange are minimal. Accordingly, traffic operations approach free flow conditions; 4. Under design hour conditions for the 2010 evaluation year (traffic volumes and im- proved roadway geometry), all intersections are expected to operate at level -of -service "C" or better. 5. Site related improvements are limited to the provision of northbound right turn lanes along the east frontage road at both site driveways. For ease of use and construc- tion, a continuous right turn lane from the north drive to the south drive appears ap- propriate. From the south drive, the lane should extend 485 feet to the south before starting an 18.5:1 taper to match the exist- ing east edge of pavement. The need for this lane is likely to occur in 1996 if straight line traffic growth causes the directional hourly traffic volumes to exceed 100 vehicles per hour. Given the length of this lane, it may overlap the proposed construction of a new frontage road in conjunction with the I-25/SH 119 project. 9 9R::'. I 1 1 I 1 I i 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 Accordingly, the design, construction, and timing for the right turn deceleration lane should be fully coordinated. 10 912 to APPENDIX 931249 HC M NSI Ar`«.. I 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I i U 1 . r -.t r r I ...1.411/'.1:KIIrb1*.0 RC 11.1/1'0'.3 44444 1 I R 111. 1 Y..,1.. :NG INFCRMATICN • G.: RUNNING SPEED. MAJC%--: • (REZT. :.!,:tk FACTOR ▪ I.`PV.ATIOv CC ,`OOO 1.. .E f.AST/!..:s . - �i:L%1 .0.7H .. '.IVE �P^ 0i 7H'_ NORTH/uTk STF.1Ci YT:1f.: ACAC; NAME JP "N.'' ;1: iAL"' c U 1:4E ANALY`.:•_, X 111:11/ddivy ' TIME .ANAL•: z MFfrK,,; .310 07,1EINFORMATION.... .r' Iti.SLCTION TYPE : ND CONTROL. TYRrT-INTER E'Cr.. JN MAJ •'R •;TS2cT:r OIRCC.TION: NOS7H/.5i:UTt•. ._NTRUL TYPE wZ_•TE;u;.•ND: .RAF: T.- VJLVMES S weN? ~J_ ..C. T 1S C C :RU -- O 20 '$5 NIiIHT O O NUMBER OF LANES LANE: ES WB NO s3 n7.1 AZ,JUSTMENT FACTORS ?ERCENT RICHT TURN CURS RADIL6 i rt) d:rC.ERAi:oN L:r. GRADC ANGLE FOR :irHT TURN: rOR RIGHT Ti,r:r•,': 4E-.]liN,) 0.00 :,(C-•T•1N 0.OG C' .OQ vEHICLZ Ci7r^,POS: TON Cr.) rr 0 SU TRUCK'. COMeINATIVN AND RV'S VEHICLES t nOTORCYCL.S ZAUTCOGNU .-. w'E_.TSOON0 J 0 0 NCr;HGOUND 0 0 p TatiOUND 0 0 0 ..R TICAL GAPS nIGr1Tr. TABULAR VALu23 �0 -.-----•-- ADJUSTED VAL_iE ,=•IJfi DICT . wo 0.S0 ...50 0.00 MAJUr( LEFTS 5B 5.50 S .L0 0.00 MINOR LEFTS we 8.00 8.00 0.00 :OENTI;'YING INFORMATION tiA�c G.' "1.c EAST/14E57 >TREE- SOUTH DRIVE ;.AMA Jf' rHE NORTH/SOUTH C TtiLZ- r:R0N', AGE R0AO UAit J'ND TIME Or- THti ANALY5i=. PM P)'. MP OThLR 9r3249 1 1 1 1 1 1 I• I „'AC :.. AND .,.ZVEL • or - .vo Cc M:aJOe< TREE T 3 LEFT 7•G7EN- ACTUAL LOW • T:i,L MOVEMENT SHARED .;?,T:: .:APA,_ _ TY CAPAC: T'," ,: A A:.: Tcr vi Ocph 1 c , QC,: 7, ; c , 2c0h 1 ..:.•::.:41 . P M �.r' 17 _91 .31 .:r)1 I) _•:7 0 765 765 :DENT IrYING INFORMATION ='t RVI.. 7o5 NAMC OF THE EAST/WEST STREET SOUTH ;DRIVE NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH TR cTFRCNTAGE ROAD CA f c ()Mr) TINE CF THE ANALY IS 06-1-1973 . PM PK Hr-, 20:C' THIEk : NFCRMAT:CN.... 765 • SC12.49 1 1 1 '1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I • 1R3. H(M). SIGNALIZEC INT":_".:TION_ _„mmAil:Y :1EPOAT r rl r r r r..rr.r4r.r rr r rr r �l r rrf rP:VPVrt[c�.r r: rr.r rlrt frrr. r r r rrr r r r. r 4 5 r r rr r•.r ....r, ♦ �+L _Un.. i_1\ 24/2AS7 RRON ACE ROAD AS:EA . OTHER. AN6 EGC vCLDME'_ i EUmE7Rr .1L! NS -.�S Z.. AL:..r.)..15 ._ L.,.) :-._.., 20 .:V . i 12.0 T 1_.v TR _. 12.0 T 12.3 ...... 3 • _.. _._.3 ._.C .... ✓ .2.V' i__ .. ._... AD;L TMEr4T FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ 9KG LUSEi PHI 2El1_i PED. Su7. ARR. TYPE ‘ '. ) (t) ) Y/N Nm NG y/N T C3 0.00 00 N 0 0 0.0 0 N __ .s WE 0.30 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N :A3 0.30 2.00 :. 0 0.•+0 v N 3 .3 C•.00 _.:'C J 0.•70 3 N DIBNAL. .f• 7INGs CYCLE ....:a,I:7 PH •. F•1 2 Ph -3 PH -4 N8 'H-1 ^n -i--2 r- LL. _. x X N 8 LT TH X TN : X ST X P;: RD 4E LT X X ':B LT 'c Ti.) X 7H ,' i X RT X PD PD X ;:•F:EEN _ . _ 20.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN C.0 0.0 .., Le YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.3 YELLOW 0.0 0.0 S.C. LEVEL OF SERVIC_' _._ ._.... L/.NE GRP. . V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. L4ELA1 ...-� . ES 0.455 0.600 6.3 8 12.4 Cs 1 0.536 0.314 15.5 W8 L 0.035 0.600 4.s A 14.6 0.484 0.314 1S.v NB _ J . t•55 0.14 163.7 C 17.7 3.097 0._:. 12.9 •38 0.078 0.314 12.8 B 14.: ' 0.040 0.314 12.7 A 0.39. 0.314 14.6 C, INTERSECT:0N: Delay - 14.0 (sac/veh) V/C = 0.55 LOS • 9-71""' _9 Supplemental Exhibit ITEM J 1N REFERENCE TO PUD PLAT NOTE J. WEED CONTROL NELSON ENGINEERS 822 7TH STREET GREELEY. COLORADO 80631 (303) 3564362 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 August 11, 1993 Mr. Norman Wells Soil Conversation Service 9595 Nelson Road, Box D Longmont, CO 80501 RE: Weed Control - Ft. Junction PUD, 1st Filing Dear Mr. Wells: A few days ago Art Uhrich of this office discussed with you weed control at the subject site during and after construction. In accordance with that conversation, I wish to inform you that it is the owners intent to follow the SCS guidelines as closely as possible both during and after construction. During development of the initial PUD plan, the owner plans to control weeds with chemicals and to mow regularly throughout the construction period. Every attempt will be made to prevent weeds from maturing to keep them from reseeding the area. Upon completion of construction all areas will be landscaped and seeded with grasses compatible with this location. Grass mixes will be submitted to the U.S. Soil Conservation Service in Longmont for review and approval. No changes within the PUD plan are anticipated outside of the 1st PUD plan application. We will appreciate receiving your concurrence with this plan for weed control. If you have any questions, please call Mr. Uhrich or me. Respectfully, LaVern C. Nelson, P.E. LCN:pa 9a1249 EXHIBIT ITEM .1 1 .1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 I 1 UNITED STATE.. Soil DEPARTMENT OF Conservation AGRICULTURE Service August 24, 1993 Nelson Engiineers 822 7th Street Greeley, Coloardo 80631 RE: Weed Control - Ft. Junction PUD 9595 Nelson Road OD Longmont, CO. 80501 Phone: 776-4034 RECEIVED AUG 2 5 1993 I have received your letter of August 11 and I am in concurrence with your plan for weed control on the PUD plan. Mowing and/or chemicals applied during construction should be adequate to control weed growth. Seeding to an adapted grass after construction is completed should give long term weed control. If you desire a recommendation for the adapted species for seeding, please feel free to call. If you need further assistance, please not hesitate to call. Our office phone number is 776-4034 and our office hours are 7:30 to 5:00, Monday through Friday. Sjr►icerely, Noman J.LWells, Jr. District Conservationist 91"49 Exhibit Item K - Plat Notes MOUNTAIN VIEW FIRE PR. : ECTION DISTRICT Administrative Office: 700 Weaver Park Road • Longmont, CO 80501 (303) 772-0710 Metro (303) 6664404 August 9, 1993 Mr. Loren Bley Bley Associates 2020 Clubhouse Drive Greeley, CO 80634 RE: Del Camino Pre -Release Center - Utility Service Dear Mr. Bley: The proposed site for the facility is within the boundaries of the Mountain View Fire Protection District. Fire protection service to the facility will be provided by this Fire District. The utility plan, undated, which was sent to the Fire District has been reviewed for compliance with the adopted codes and standards of the District. Per our agreement on the telephone today, I have calculated the required fire flow as 1500 gallons per minute at 20 pounds per square inch for this facility using the following criteria: 1. The building will have a total floor area counting first and second floors„ and mezzanines of less than 128,700 square feet. SWIM 9119 Cory Line R6. tongmon, CO 10501 2. The building will be of Type I or Type II Fire Resistant Construction as defined by the Uniform Building Code. 3. The building will be sprinklered throughout by an automatic sprinkler system complying with the requirements of N.F.P.A. Standard 13, Standard for the installation of Sprinkler Systems. 4. The building will be detected throughout by a smoke detection system. The fire alarm system will be remoted to an approved monitoring point. Station 2 10971 wCA 17 Lapmeni, CO 50504 Del Camino Pre -Release Facility - Utility Plan lof2 Swim"O P.O. Boa 575 299 Pa1mu An. Moe. CO 00542 54a11cn4 StMbn5 P.O. Box 11 IOW 000bn Ron 6500 w -q Reno LxtryM. CO NMu, CO50544 x0026 Sawn S S1rbn7 P.O.0oa66x' P.O.Owa 900 Bn006 100 So. bust 9. CS, CO 00519 Oacono, COI0SN S31249 1 1 1 1 1 1 'I 1 If these criteria change then the required fire flow will need to be recalculated. If the water system as shown will provide the required fire flow, then the water system is approved. Documentation will be needed from the design engineers. Hydrant locations as shown will be approved. There is an area on the east wall within the fenced yard that is not reachable within 650 foot of a hydrant by line of travel. However, the standpipe system inside the building will be usable in lieu of installing an additional hydrant and associated mains around the east side of the building. The design of the access roads, as shown, meet the standards of the District, as long as the roads will support 60,000 pounds imposed load. Chief Ward, Chief of the District, would like to meet with the representatives of the owner to discuss other issues with them. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Charles E. Boyes Fire Prevention Specialist • CC: Jerry Ward, Chief of the District William N. Bailey, Deputy Chief, Support Services Mark A. Lawley, Assistant Chief, Fire Prevention Del Camino Pre -Release Facility - Utility Plan 2of2 1 9:12,'9 ' Iplemental Exhibit ITEM M— IN RL.ERENCE TO PUD PLAT NOTE 11. - Rural Ditch NELSON ENGINEERS 822 7TH STREET 0REELEY, COLORADO 80631 (303) 356-6362 August 6, 1993 Job 314 Rural Ditch Company Attn: Lee Gould, Jr. 12148 WCR #13 Longmont, CO 80504 RE: Fort Junction P.U.D. Dear Sir: A developer is in the process of purchasing the captioned parcel of land from the New Creation Ministries. At present, the purchaser is preparing the final plans for the first filing of the north 22 acres of Fort Junction P.U.D. He is required to notify ditch companies of any intentions and to demonstrate that the plans do not affect your ditch. The accompanying plan shows that the first filing is approximately 900 to 1,000 feet north of the Rural Ditch. Further, natural drainage is north and away from the ditch. No site runoff will be discharged into the ditch as a result of this development and there are no plans to grade the farmland between the ditch and the first filing of Fort Junction. If there are any questions, please contact our office. Very truly yours, Arthur F."Uhrich AFU:pa Enclosure 1 1 1 '1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 The public is invited to attend an informational meeting, sponsored by Greeley/Weld County Economic Development (E.D.A.P.), on Monday, April 26, 1993 at 7:00 p.m. at the Budget Host Motel in Del Camino. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss the establishment of a correctional facility in an unincorporated area of southwestern weld County. 921249 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 WELCOME The Greeley/Weld Economic Development Action Partnership has been asked to sponsor tonights neighborhood meeting between The Villa and landowners, businesspeople and residents of the Del Camino and immediate surrounding areas. EDAP respectfully asks people not living, conducting business or owning land In the immediate area to wait and ask their questions after the formal meeting. At 7:00 D.M. there will be a 30 -minute presentation by the Villa explaining the proposed pre -parole release facility. At 7:30 n.m. the facilitator for the evening will invite the people who have signed the "QUESTION SIGN-UP SHEET," in the order they have signed up,to ask their questions. At 8:30 p.m. the meeting will be brought to an end and those who still have questions may stay and informally ask their questions of the representatives of The Villa. The Public Hearing on the proposed zoning change by Weld County will be held separately In the future. For more information on the Public Hearing, please call Weld County at 356-4000. Because the Weld County Commissioners will be hearing testimony and will be acting on the proposed zoning change, they will not be at tonights meeting. There will be a Weld County Representative to answer Weld County Government questions. Because of the time constraints, and because EDAP wants to allow all people who live, own property or conduct business in the area a chance to ask questions, there will not be an open forum at tonights meeting. Thank you for your cooperation. 9::1249 • Es 5"m .�a n�Asas1I poi: d6 I 5 _g& -; W39 03A-S„Be^Y' S a� 1 1 1 1 1• dT �gmad.' 5t b ocg loct,b4� aay $ y�� a ;'Ju; � s ma .• 9:1..�jl:d'g' .. .Ot• G b y�i 8.d 00 o g y g ti d.Fi O a'-1 Y .; flj g tyi y ao 5 t- 8 n9•s s°Y .qyy a cN. zf muY d.(� .!/j � A ��y//t A e jfl- a• Vl O ill b a. O, -14e Y � d ..a O O/ fJ � °'Ar' gEa° ga � g b2�'9ts9.;Ea t Corrections official will help fight pre -parole facility By GABRIELLE E JOHNSTON Times -Call DEL CAMINO — A former state corrections official has stepped into the ring to help Del Camino residents fight a pro- posed pre -parole facility in Del Camino. We don't need any more profi- teering private types," said Roger Lauen, who said he was appointed by Gov. Roy Romer to serve on the Colorado Criminal Justice Commission. Lauen also said he is a member of Boulder County's Jail Crowding Task Force and a criminology profes- sor at the University of Colorado. He also was the state director the Colorado Community Corrections for eight years, Lauen said. A state corrections representa- tive said Lauen is now associated with Citizens for Correctional Re- form. Lauen, a Boulder resident, said he would lead the charge to de- fect the proposal and expressed confidence that it could be done. "All you have to do is make enough noise," Lauen said. Some area residents have cited escape rates, a decrease in prop- erty values and concern over the type of people the facility would attract as reasons to oppose the facility. The 300•bed privately owned fa- cility would house inmates for 90 days while they received inten- sive educational training and counseling. While the developers of the jail, The Villa at Greeley, have not yet designated a specific site, they have narrowed the pos- sibilities to the -Del Camino area. Greeley, Evans and Windsor have rejected the same proposal. Lauen said the state does not need another parole facility, as the state already has 23 residen- tial and 15 non-residential cor- rectional programs. These pro- grams, which include the Long- mont Community Treatment Cen- ter, are adequate, Lauen said. Furthermore, there is no rea- son the state should sign a con- tract with The Villa when funding already is provided to the Colo- rado Department of Corrections to implement similar programs, he said. '01^'env+. scre Fr] �7�r..�� 77� house!. os residents bow fray'developers at the Villa nt aeil��/ ,would house Greeley aro being less than honest about the Neil. ✓ i ye. • violent offenders ({. i Out Villa adri,inistrater John Coppom said he has been truthful front/ the' beginning,:. "We are committed to' furnis1Jng the cwnplete truth on any Issue,"'-Coppom said. Residents said 'developers originally told them that' only property; setae and drug offenders would Le housed hr the facility:,; ' • "The only persons who will be placed in the fired- , ply will be minlmuin•risk,offenders," Coppom said. Ile explaiised that 'he,,origirmlly told residents thai , Dy GABRIELLE JOHNSTON limos -Colt Stall Wilier ' •: i DEL, CAMINO — Residents claim developers of the prapmrole facility proposed for Del Camino' have lied about plans for the prison, failing to tell resi- dents violent offenders could be housed there, Area residents hove opposed the 00Pbed facility from the beginning, and resistance is building fast I 1 ancy the facility wank! louse• "primarily" property and drug offenders. "When you shake it down, aloud 7 percent of the populations at one facility will be serving time for a violent crime, and these 1'eaplo will have been dLas- sified down lu uiiuiuww risk," Cnppurn said. 9t Is a misstatement to say that this Le'thty, as n tome, wwdd handler whoa ufterdcrs." Tom Waters, attorney for the legal services with the Colorado thp:u•wmnl of Corrections, said that state would determine who is housed at 11w faultily, In cooperation with Use Villa. . "Art offender who is assigned to this facility is going to be an indi- vidual who is will,,,, o certain pc - Ned of their parole date," waters said. - "A perswr who has been pa. roles! after serving a sentence for a violent crime lms certainly, in the eyes of the parole board, been seen as ready fur integration into the community," Waters said. "The idea that prisoners arc going to be escaping willy-nilly from a secured facility is not a totally reasonable fear. Obvl trusty, Wings can and do go wrong with secured facilities. Escapes do happen." • Waters said the state takes see -- oral precautions to ensure the safety of surrounding coiwnuni•. Ues,however. ',Residents also said they feel Coppom was dishonest about the amount of time inmates would serve at the facility. Originally, ' residents understood that inmates would serve tie days, but later learned that they could serve as many as 180 days. •f Coppom said lie always told residents that Inmates would . 'scree nn "average" of b days. Del Camino area residents now are circulating petitions opposing Use: facility, which they plan ,19; present to the Weld County Plan' • nine' Commission. In addition, ,.Concerned Citizens of Del Cams. 1 . Ito,:a group of residents, Is work- 7. !ing un other ways to demonstrate 4. 1 .e•lopposition to the prison, '••"' •'-^ • }t Coneen about lbs types of peoe•, pie who would visit the facility :tops the 114 of their concerns, the', .residents said. ' • ", ;:"Some of the visitors to the la- •, �cltly ere as bad as the people la 'aka facility or worse," said Yank' Canepe, a Del Camino area real- ! a But Waters said Useso concerns.' I • 'ire Irrational. "'They are people " 'just like you and I," Waters salt. -, ' Waters said the state will sup ;sport the Villa's efforts to build a . ' pre -parole facility, but will not in- tervene in discussions between • residents and the developers. •"We are supportive of eho •Villa. We always recognise that -. the need to gain community aO captante is theirs," Waters sold, 'adding that residents who do nut want the facility aro free to use 'the "democratic processes at • :link disposal.' , 9C1249 RVY •%Mrran f 1 1 1 1 n F rP r' xm agU Ir. r � fm �vk,j Cp tt ErAF ` III gtbG E Z. iiir;gdiwk g�14;41414prifE; I; i�.�n.�i i�CDaft �" A p�1' x'��-E. � " n r 1 s B.m . o .. 7. q g y ttigtRt -t? q!' qE' n ogdi.r g&es.. fl g. Ent? q„ hare va n tt e-ig-vaitp fn. ti; kpr DI" �.'V' 1C�r q aP a r.f n tiq mittp9.re P rot ,g, BSf.'a g �b e ; ¢rig is -s ging g""! N"S cT 4 l'JUY'AYd5;Nav 91249 r 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 STATE OF COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION P.O. Box 850 1420 2nd Street Greeley, Colorado 80632-0850 (303)153.1232 August 17, 1993 Mr. Art Uhrich Nelson Engineers 822 7th Street, Suite 520 Greeley, Colorado 80631 Dear Mr. Uhrich: 0 Web! P-unty Planning AUG 2 01993 OT IIMMEMWWWUMMOIS IM-IRCX) 025-3(110) Del Camino Interchange Subaccount 91033 Thank you for contacting the Region 4 office of the Colorado Department of Transpor- tation regarding future plans for reconstruction of the Interstate 25/State Highway 119 interchange at Del Camino. It isour understanding that Weld County has re- quested a metes and bounds description,of the easterly realignment of the frontage road in relation to your client's property northeast of I-25 and Weld County Road 24. We are currently in the process of designing an interchange which will accommodate the eventual widening of I-25 to six lanes. In about one month, we expect to have a preliminary design establishing the location of the future frontage road intersection on County Road 24 as well as the on/off ramp terminal. Until the design is determined, we can not provide a preciselocation for the new frontage road intersection along County Road 24. For your information, reconstruction of the interchange is currently scheduled for the Fall of 1995. An alignment for the relocation)f the frontage road east of 1-25 had been provided to developers a number of years ago prior to the current planning for widening 1-25 to six lanes. It may be necessary to adjust the previously determined location and alignment to allow for the six -lane concept. Any adjustment of the previous frontage road concept will require coordination with the development on both sides of County Road 24 to ensure a single location for the ultimate frontage road intersection. Please contact Mr. Dave Forsyth at 757-9392 in our Denver design squad for further information on the status of interchange plans. DDD(WRJ)cm Weld County Planning Dept. T. Jones D. Forsyth File via Elmquist Very truly yours, David D. Davis Region Preconstruction Engineer 931249 I •i I 1 I I i I I I I I I I I I May 10, 1993 Weld County Planning & Zoning Mr. Chuck Cunliffe Administrative Building Planning Department 1400 No. 17th Ave. Greeley, Colo., 80631 Mr. Cunliffe= After a week, the feathers have cleared from the meeting at DelCamino in reference to the "Villa" Minimum Prison Facility to be located on road 24 & I-25. After reading all the literature that was given at the meeting I am still against any zoning that would allow this facility to be located in the Del Camino area. I feel that it would ruin what rural settings we have left. I can't imagine a prison across the field from "Barbour Ponds"..a state park..I can't image a prison a couple of miles from DelCamino mobile home park...I can't imagine the poor farmer who has to live across the street from the 10' fences with bobbed wire and dogs~o patrol. This is not a positive move for our area. Wes'8mething good for our community. We will never get anything from this facility (but trouble) as it is a private partnership. We loose more money on our houses worth, and "The villa" makes millions. Please do not change the zoning so this prison facility can move in. It needs to be farther East were there are NO people... Cathy Diesing 9054 I-25 Frontage Road East Longmont, Colorado 80504 I I 1 1 ,1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 13 REFERRAL LIST NAHE: The Villa at Greeley. Inc CASE NUMBER: S-344 c/o John T. Coppom, Administrator REFERRALS SENT: September 3, 1993 REFERRALS TO BE RECEIVED BY: September 17, 1993 coax TOWNS and CITIES -L_Attorney _Ault `-'_E__Health Department Brighton _Extension Service `Broom£leld Emergency Management Office 'Decono ICI:Sheriff`s Office Eaton `'_Engineering —Erie Housing Authority Evans `Airport Authority iFirestone ✓_Building Inspection _Fort Lupton Frederick BCE _Garden City Division of Water Resources—Cilcrest l/t_X Geological Survey Greeley _ Department of Health _,Grover ....IL_Department of Transportation Hudson _Historical Society Johnstown Water Conservation Board _Keenesburg _E__Oil and Gas Conservation Commission _Kersey La Salle FIRE DISTRICTS Lochbuie Ault F-1 tX Longmont Berthoud F-2 X Mead _Briggsdale F-24 Milliken Brighton 1-3 New Raymer _Eaton F-4 _Northglenn _Fort Lupton F-5 Nunn Galeton F-6 Pierce Hudson F-7 _Platteville Johnstown F-8 Severance La Salle F-9 Thornton ✓ X. Mountain View F-10 Windsor _Milliken F-11 Nunn F-12 COUNTIES Pawnee F-22 Adams Platteville F-13 Boulder 'Platte Valley F-14 �Larimer Poudre Valley 1-15 _Raymer F-2 FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES Southeast Weld F-16 ✓rE_US Army Corps of Engineers _Windsor/Severance F-17 _USDA -APHIS Veterinary Service Wiggins F-18 Federal Aviation Administration Western Hills F-20 _Federal Communication Commission OTHER SOIL CONSERVATION DISTRICTS Central Colo. Water Conservancy Dist. Brighton Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. `Fort Collins LX Tri-Area Planning Commission _Greeley _X__Wyco Pipeline UL_Longmont West Adams SOMMTSSION/BOARD MEMBER ✓L_Shirley Camenisch 921249 .1 COLORADO 1 1 1 1 1 September 3, 1993 The Villa at Greeley, Inc. c/o John T. Coppom, Administrator 1750 6th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303)353-3345, EXT. 3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 1400 N. 17TH AVENUE GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 Subject: S-344 - Request for a Planned Unit Development Final Plan (Ft. Junction, First Filing) on a parcel of land described as part of the SW4 of Section 2, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. Dear Mr. Coppom: Your application and related materials for the request described above are complete and in order at the present time. I have scheduled a meeting with the Weld County Planning Commission for October 5, 1993, at 1:30 p.m. This meeting will take place in the County Commissioners' Hearing Room, first floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 ve theStreet, tr act Greeley, to answer Colorado. anyIt is recommended that you and/or a questions the members might have with respect to your application. In addition, Planning have scheduled a meeting with the Weld County Utilities Advisory Commission tember 23, 1993, at 10:00 a.m. This meeting will Committee for Thursday, Administrative Offices, ill take place in the WeldCounty1400 N. 17th Avenue, Craeley, Colorado. It is the policy of Weld County to refer an application of this nature to any town or municipality lying within three miles of the property in question or if the property under consideration is located within the comprehensive planning area of a town or municipality. Therefore, our office has forwarded a materials to the City of Longmont. Town of Mead, and Tri-Area Planning Commissions for their review and comments. Please call Brad Schol, in Lon copy of the submitted Bertina Willden, in Mead, at 535-4477, and Jay Curtis, Longmont, at 3-3 , for further details regarding the date, time, and Tri-Area, ac meetings. 8330 and recommended that you and/or a representative beinpattendance lace of hatethe Lon msnt, Ie Mis ead, and Tri Area Planning Commission Meetings to answer members may Longmont, Kcad, have with respect to your application. any questions the Commission It is the responsibility of an applicant to see that a sign is posted on the property under consideration at least 10 days preceding the hearing date. Sometime Prior to September 22, 1993, you or a representative should call me to obtain three signs to be posted on the site no later than September 24, 1993.. adjacent co and visible from all publicly maintained road right-of-wayhall be the t the property under consideration is not adjacent to a posted of -way, the applicant shall post one sign in the most publicly mplaceinedhe property y ght- The Villa at Greeley. Inc, prominent place on the property • ,7' a,t4 r 1 1 '1 e The Villa at Greeley, i . c/o John T. Coppom, Administrator September 3, 1993 Page 2 and post a second sign at the point at which the driveway (access drive) intersects a publicly maintained road right-of-way. Your sign posting certificate must be returned to the Department of Planning Services' office on or before the date of the hearing. The Department of Planning Services' staff will make a recommendation concerning this application to the Weld County Planning Commission. This recommendation will be available twenty-four (24) hours before the scheduled hearing. It is the responsibility of the applicant to call the Department of Planning Services' office before the Planning Commission hearing to make arrangements to obtain the recommendation. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to call me. ' Respectfully, j `Z T ' l- ]Curl Currant Planner 1 1 U 1 1 KAS/sfr 94;1249 1. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 DATE: October 5. 1993 CASE NUMBER: S-344 NAME: The Villa at Greeley, Inc., c/o John T. Coppom ADDRESS: 1750 6th Avenue, Greeley, Colorado 80631 REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Planned Unit Development Plan. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the SW4 of Section 2, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: South of and adjacent to Weld County Road 24-1/2 and east of and adjacent to the east I-25 Frontage Road. THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THIS REQUEST BE APPROVED FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: 1. The submitted materials are in compliance with the application requirements of Sections 28.9 and 28.11.1 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 2. The Planned Unit Development (PUD) plan application is in conformance with Section 28,13 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: The proposed PUD plan is located within the I-25 Mixed -Use Development Area. The uses proposed for the PUD plan are consistent with the uses described in the 1.25 Mixed -Use Development Area and Activity Center Section of the Comprehensive Plan; The PUD plan conforms to the PUD district and PUD District plat notes. The Planned Unit Development District specifically allows for C-1, C-2, C-3, C-4, and I-1 uses as listed in the Weld County Zoning Ordinance; The application materials demonstrate that the uses allowed under the proposed PUD plan can be made compatible with existing and future development of the surrounding area and also with the future development as projected by the Weld County Comprehensive Plan; The proposed PUD plan will conform with the performance standards of Section 35.3 of the Zoning Ordinance; The PUD plan is located in the Planned Unit Development overlay district. No other districts affect this site; and The Utility Coordinating Advisory Committee reviewed and approved the utility plan map at its September 23, meeting. These determinations are based, in part, upon a review of the information submitted by the applicant, other relevant information regarding this request, and responses of referral entities reviewing the request. 1 5 9+:1249 1 1 t 1 e 1 1 1 1 RECOMMENDATION, S-344 The Villa at Greeley, Inc.. c/o John T. Coppom Page 2 The Department of Planning Services' staff recommendation for approval is conditional upon the following: 1. Prior to recording the PUD plan plat: a. The Subdivision Improvements Agreement shall be approved by the Board of County Commissioners. The security for the agreement shall be tendered to and accepted by the Board of County Commissioners for the subdivision improvements agreements. b. The required 80 foot right-of-way dedication for I-25 Frontage Road realignment shall be made by the property owner to the State Highway Department and shown on the Planned Unit Development plan plat. 2. The following notes shall be placed on the PUD plan plat prior to recording: The uses permitted within the PUD plan shall be limited to a 386 inmate pre-release facility as described in the application materials. Any and all expansion or change in uses shall require an amendment to the approved PUD plan. Approval of this plan may create a vested property right pursuant to Section 90 of the Zoning Ordinance. Should a complete application for residential development be submitted to the Department of Planning Services for processing on property within 500 feet of this PUD Plan, a new landscaping and screening plan shall be submitted to the Department of Planning Services for review and approval to mitigate any visual impacts. The approved landscaping and screening plan shall be completed within the next planting season. All streets within the PUD plan, except the future East I-25 Frontage Road and Weld County Road 24-1/2, are private and shall be built and maintained by the owner of the run district. The requirements of the Colorado Department of Transportation, as outlined in its letter dated September 17. 1993, shall be complied with. Sewer service shall be provided by the St. Vrain Sanitation District. Central Weld County Water District shall provide domestic water to the Area within the PUD plan. 921249 1 1 1 I 1 1 RECOMMENDATION, S-344 The Villa at Greeley, Page 3 Inc., c/o John T. Coppom Installation of utilities shall comply with Section 10 of the Weld County Subdivision Ordinance. A site plan review is required in accordance with Section 35.4 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. All liquid and solid wastes shall be stored and removed for final disposal in a manner that protects against surface and groundwater contamination. No permanent disposal of wastes shall be permitted at this site. The maximum permissible noise level shall not exceed the Industrial limit of 80 dB(A), as measured according to 25-12-102, Colorado Revised Statutes. A plan review for all food preparation areas shall be submitted to and approved by the Weld County Health Department. A Colorado license to operate a Food Service. Establishment shall be obtained from the Weld County Health Department prior to the use of any Food Service Establishments on site. The facility shall be provided with handicap accessibility as provided in Chapter 31 of the 1991 Uniform Building Code. Exterior fenced enclosures into which exits from a building terminate, shall be provided with a safe dispersal area located a minimum of 50 feet from the building. Dispersal areas shall be based upon no less than 3 square feet per occupant. A gate shall be provided from this dispersal area to allow for necessary relocation. Structures shall not exceed 50 feet in height. The property owner shall participate with the State Highway Department and construct or guarantee construction of continuous right turn lanes and or declaration lanes should it be required by the State Highway Department. Culverts for access locations, shall be a minimum of 30 inches in diameter and shall be CMP or CSP, rather than concrete. Landscaping of the PUD Plan area within public rights -of -way shall be maintained by the applicant/property owners. New utility lines or connections which occur within the State Highway right-of-way shall require a utility permit issued by the • State Highway Department. 9C1249 1 r I I I. I I i I I I I ADDITIONAL COMMENTS The Villa at Greeley, c/o John T. Coppom S-344 The Tri-Area Planning Commission voted to recommend that this application be rejected. The City of Longmont Planning Department did not object to this land use application. Concerns expressed will be addressed through the Site Plan application process. I 9``12e39 I' Exhibit Item 21A PLANNEu UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CHAN4. aF ZONE AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS SURFACE ESTATE 1 .1 1 Legal Description: A Part of the Southwest Quarter (SW 1/4) of Section 2, Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, Weld County, Colorado. STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS COUNTY OF WELD ) THE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn, states that co the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names, addresses, and the corresponding Parcel Identification Number assigned by the Weld County Assessor of the owners' of property (the surface estate) within five hundred feet of the property under consideration This list was compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor, or an ownership update from a title or abstract company or attorney, derived from such records, or from the records of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. The list compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor shall have been assembled within thirty days of the application's submission date. ' The I if Vday 1 reilym foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn co before me this 4/41/ 40/1 , 191i. WITNESS my hand and official seal. My Commission Expires; *OrnstionepinlbasibirSaffill ot$ty Public 4.9; 71.249 Exhibit Item 21B PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CHANCE OF ZONE NAMES OF OWNERS Seprint PROPERTY Etype IN 500 FEET Pleas ADDRESS, TOWN/CITY, ASSESSOR'S PARCEL STATE AND ZIP CODE IDENTIFICATION 9 the Rademacher h'amily 3525 Highway 119 Partnership Ltd. Longmont CO 80504 bU60 Broadway IState of Colorado Denver, CO 80216 Dept. of Game & Fish 111 Glade Rd. Carlson, Stener J. & Loveland, CO 80537 Frances F Carlson, Stener J. & 4111 Glade Rd. Frances E. St. Vrain Land Com- '�y 1 i 1 1 1 1 Weld Count St. Vrain Land Com- pany New Creation Ministries & World Outreach Ctr. Church 6999 York StRO??4 rtAnai n_r co 915 10th Street 1311010_00046 131303000038 131303000016 6999 York Sc. ..D nvnr 1'0 80219 737 Bross Longmont CO 803 (Bk. 1140 Rec. # 020828)0) 111q(0000004 t,',0000O4 131302000060 131302000059 93249 I I 1 1 1 I Exhibit tem 22A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CHANCE OF ZONE AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS MINERALS AND/OR SUBSURFACE ESTATE Legal Description: A Part of the Southwest Quarter (SW 1/4), Section 2, Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, Weld County, Colorado.' STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS COUNTY OF WELD ) THE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn, states chat to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names and addresses of all mineral owners and lessees of mineral owners on or under the parcel of land under as their names appear upon the records in the Weld County Clerk and Recorder's Office or from an ownership update from a title or abstract company or an attorney. The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn co before mo this day of dGyfe seal. My Commission Expires: WITNESS my hand and official 971(cary Public 4. vj/ fl 9""1?,1q r I i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Exhibit Item 22B AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS MINERAL AND/OR SUBSURFACE The following is a list of the names and addresses of all mineral owners and lessees of mineral owners on or under the previously described real property: 1. Mineral Owners: Same as surface owner. 2. Lessees: The following individuals and/or entities have lease -hold interests in oil and gas rights underlying the property. Amoco Production Company Security Life Building Denver, Colorado 80202 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING I hereby certify that I have placed a true and correct copy of the surrounding property owners and owners and lessees of minerals in accordance with the notification requirements of Weld County in Case Number S344 for The Villa at Greeley, Inc., c/o John T. Coppon. Administrator in the United States Mail, postage prepaid First Class Mail by letter as addressed on the attached list. this 8th day of September, 1993. OtotTO 1 I 4(.9 931249 1 1 .1 I 1 1 1 i 1 1 SURROUNDING PROPERTY AND/OR INTEREST OWNERS SURFACE ESTATE/MINERALS AND/OR SUBSURFACE ESTATE The Villa at Greeley, Inc., c/o John T. Coppom, Administrator S-344 The Rademacher Family Partnership, Ltd. 3525 Highway 119 Longmont, CO 80504 State of Colorado Department of Game and Fish 6060 Broadway Denver, CO 80216 Stener J. and Frances E. Carlson 4111 Glade Road Loveland, CO 80537 St. Vrain Land Company 6999 York Street Denver, CO 80229 New Creation Ministries and World Outreach Center Church 737 Bross Longmont, CO 80501 Amoco Production Company Security life Building Denver, CO 80202 Weld County Board of County Commissioners 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 9C4 A.49 1 1 1 1 I DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303) 3533845, EXT. 3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 1400 N. 17TH AVENUE GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 DATE: September 7, 1993 TO: SURROUNDING PROPERTY/MINERAL OWNERS CASE NUMBER: S-344 There will be a Public Hearing before the Weld County Planning Commission on Tuesday, October 5, 1993, at 1:30 p.m., in the County Commissioners' Hearing Room, First Floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado concerning the request of: NAME: The Villa at Greeley, Inc., c/o John T. Coppom, Administrator FOR: A Planned Unit Development Final Plan (Ft. Junction, First Filing). LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the SW4 of Section 2, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.N., Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: South of and adjacent to Weld County Road 24-1/2 and east of and adjacent to the east 1-25 Frontage Road. Your property is within five -hundred (500) feet of the property on which this request has been made or you may have an interest in the minerals located under the property under consideration. For additional information write or telephone Keith A. Schuett, Current Planner. Comments or objections related to the above request should be submitted in writing to the Weld County Department of Planning Services, 1400 N. 17th Avenue, Greeley, Colorado 80631, on or before the date of public hearing, 9.01249 1 1 9;1249 \ t, r ` _ ' ' � � r ; > t `/\2 !mssit J, t• W' r,/ w. 4882 O • N 1' .1 1 1 e 1 1 606 38 . • 36 • 34 32 . • 30 . 28 26 24 . 22 20 .. 18 16 10 8 6 4 C Q T..3N. to :et .,,.. O 0 k•T2N. ,,. cc 2 . : i0:: 0• • 9 .` . ,0 ..L •IrSeen MG its py• is :MR • gV �. • < F(A• • Tent ... „:rif j,r.•ei:- . Ct.:St.;F1 MMILLI M..n » ,BASE •. 1 l/A INM1 ..,: -A•'K ( eel. .A = • . .I'r� * .{i • r T. tc•reii . ..........-r- • .1 / 11111 , De COLORADO I 1 1 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303) 353.3845, EXT. 3540 WELO COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 1400 N. 17TH AVENUE GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Weld County Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, October 5, 1993, at 1:30 p.m. for the purpose of considering a Planned Unit Development Plan for the property described below. Approval of the request may create a vested property right pursuant to Colorado Law. APPLICANT: The Villa at Greeley, Inc., c/o John T. Coppom, Administrator LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the SW4 of Section 2, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.H., Weld County, Colorado. TYPE AND INTENSITY OF PROPOSED USE: A Planned Unit Development Final Plan (Ft. Junction, First Filing). LOCATION: South of and adjacent to Weld County Road 24-1/2 and east of and adjacent to the east 1-25 Frontage Road. SIZE: 22.24 acres, more or less. The public hearing will be held in the Weld County Commissioners' Hearing Room, First Floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado. Comments or objections related to the above request should be submitted in writing to the Weld County Department of Planning Services, 1400 N. 17th Avenue, Greeley, Colorado 80631, before the above date or presented at the public hearing on October 5. 1993. Copies of the application are available for public inspection in the Department of Planning Services, 1400 N. 17th Avenue, Greeley, Colorado 80631 - Phone - 353-3845, Extension 3540. Judy Yamaguchi, Chairperson Weld County Planning Commission To be published in the Windsor Beacon To be published one (1) time by September 9, 1993. Received by:?_j at— Date: 3Z12‘19 I 1 1 1 1 1 LAND USE APPLICATION SUMMARY SHEET DATE: September 28, 1993 CASE NUMBER: S-344 NAME: The Villa at Greeley, c/o John T. Coppom ADDRESS: 1750 6th Avenue, Greeley, Colorado, 80631 REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Planned Unit Development Plan (Ft. Junction, First Filling). LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the SW4 of Section 2, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: South of and adjacent to Weld County Road 24-1/2 and east of and adjacent to the east 1-25 Frontage Road. SIZE OF PARCEL: 22.24 acres, more or less. POSSIBLE ISSUES SUMMARIZED FROM APPLICATION MATERIAL; The criteria for review of this P.U.D. Planned Unit Development Final Plan are listed in Section 28.13 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. The Department of Planning Services staff has received referral responses from the following agencies: 1. Colorado Geological Survey 2. Army Corps of Engineers 3. State Highway Department 4. The City of Longmont 5. The Tri-Area Planning Commission 6. Shirley Camenisch, Planning Commission Member 7. Longmont Soil Conservation Service 8. Mountain View Fire Protection District 9. Weld County Engineering Department 10. Weld County Health Department 11. Weld County Sheriff 12. Weld County Building Inspection Department 13. Oil and Gas Conservation Commission The following Referral agencies have not responded: 1. Wyco Pipeline 2. The Town of Mead 9C.1.249 FIELD CHECK FILING NUMBER: S-344 DATE OF INSPECTION: September 21, 1993 APPLICANT'S NAME: The Villa at Greeley, c/o John T. Coppom REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Pian and a Planned Unit Development Plan. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the SW4 of Section 2, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: South of and adjacent to Weld County Road 24 1/2 and east of and adjacent to I-25 Frontage Road. LAND USE: ZONING: COMMENTS: N Weld County Road 24 1/2, pasture E Farm production, rural residence S Farm production, rural residence W I-25 Frontage Road, I-25, pasture recreational uses N A (Agricultural) E A (Agricultural) S PUD (Planned Unit Development) W A (Agricultural) and C-3 (Commercial) The property is flat and is in farm production. The proposed access is off I-25 East Frontage Road. The majority of the surrounding area is in farm production. Two rural residences are located in the area, one to the east off site and one to the south within the Planned Unit Development zone district but not within this Planned Unit Development Final Plan. No irrigation ditches affect this site. Ifylth A. Sdfleft Current Planner ,ip 9Z .gZ 49 r 1 1 .1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I' FIELD CHECK FILING NUMBER: S-344 DATE OF INSPECTION: 9-7-9,3 APPLICANT'S NAME: The Villa at Greeley, Inc., c/o John T. Coppom, Administrator CURRENT PLANNER: Keith A. Schuett REQUEST: A Planned Unit Development Final Plan (Ft. Junction, First Filing). LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the SW4 of Section 2, T2N, R66W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: South of and adjacent to Weld County Road 24-/12 and east of and adjacent to the east I-25 Frontage Road. / LAND USE: N 'A) e '4 /2 • ail J.C14I t*!t i - J n / E ((57+ I�!'cc� c , - n 4. }ltd :7:a t\r k1 472465 S J v W 2e>t,t" ' ,U -- i- as - � j f u � - �� -<- ZONING: COMMENTS: N A (Agricultural) E A (Agricultural) S (PUD) Planned Unit Development W C-3 (Commercial) and A (Agricultural) f yq/ /' /n/ D_ / v� A/ -u � aI -eel s t to-ILY i) I ,) l -O ) I:0'4e r ...it �� at/ice/4 G L L�•%f..(rlc. dealt() 4'405h i/,i�, 34412(�. aA.t1 ei_Lif tt .3 I %,✓ f .mot. JANasc,.mac fr G -et& (L .%ate' 'Le .e0 Gi act. cohz, ..dh'-'� e c4- J O e l Ub/& 6( )42 C40 Q. ce' /tip: a de Z•1 ee COLORADO I 1 Date: September 3, Weld County Planning RECEIVED SEP - 71993 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303) 353.3345, EXT. 3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 1400 N. 17TH AVENUE GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 1993 CULw. WQWNSCOMM. CASE NUMBER: S-344 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from The Villa at Greeley, Inc., c/o John T. Coppom, Administrator for a Planned Unit Development Final Plan (Ft. Junction, First Filing). The parcel of land is described as part of the SW4 of Section 2, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is south of and adjacent to Weld County Road 24-1/2 and east of and adjacent to the east I-25 Frontage Road. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by September 17, 1993, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Keith A. Schuett, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2, We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: 3.X�. We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5, Signed:/ DategP Please refer to the enclosed letter. Q L Agency: Co.& GAS CONS. Comm. 9Z1249 49 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 STATE OF COLORADO COLORADO GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Division of Minerals and Geology Department of Natural Resources 1313 Sherman Street, Rm. 715 Denver, Colorado 80203 Phone (3031866-2611 FAX 1103) 866.2461 Roy µ..ter Governor µer.5dasr EaacWtw• Director MtiCha4 µ. tong Dlvuut Dinar Vick:Gowan 54awCa luroa and Dinctw September 20, 1993 WE -94-000S Mr. Keith Schuett Department of Planning Services 1400 North 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 RE: Fort Junction PUD, First Filing Dear Mr. Schuett: SEP 2 3 1993 Wild County Planning We have reviewed the materials submitted in support of the above referenced application and the general and engineering geology of the site. It is our understanding that the mineral resource issue addressed in the application has been previously resolved. While we believe that there is a potential economic resource on the property which has not been satisfactorily characterized, we do not wish to interfere with the County's prerogative on this matter. There appear to be no geology -related problems at this site which could preclude the successful development of the proposed Pre-release Center as presented, and we have no objection to the approval of this application. Yours very truly, q e Jeffrey L Hy4et ! / Senior Engineering eologist JI-1:BAhd Gf . 1249 ii ti § 34-1-305 MINERAL RESOURCES except that such use shall not permit erection of permanent structures which would preclude permanently the extraction of commercial mineral deposits; (Laws Prior 7ti Compilans:5C R.S.I963 4 92-36-5. H.J3.1706, g 2.) Library References Zoning and Planning 4..79, 285. 390. C.J.S. Zoning and Land Planning 44 25, 63. WESTLAW Topic No. 414. 128, 200. Notes of Decisions able use of property, and thus did not effect unconstitutional taking of property. in that Act permitted uses authorized by preexisting zon- ing regulations to continue and zoning regula- tion had not been amended since the effective date of Act. Cottonwood Farms v. Board of County Comers of County of Jefferson, 1988, 763 P.2d 551. Preservation of Commercial Mineral Depos- its Act permits local governments to pass zon- ing ordinances which forbid mining operations in areas containing commercial mineral depos- its and local governments can permit any use of such land so long as the permitted use is not incompatible with mining. C & M Sand & Gravel, Div. of C & M Ready Mix Concrete Co. of Boulder v. Board of County Conies of Bout - der County, Colo.. App.1983. 673 P.2d 1013. Inverse condenutallon 1 Zoning 2 I. Inverse condemnation Enactment of Preservation of Commercial Mineral Deposits Act, which placed limitations on use of land, did not work inverse condem- nation depriving owner and lessee of all u e of property without just compensation, time of effective date of Act property was zoned agricultural, and owner and lessee were still entitled, without limitation. to all uses permitted under that zoning. Cottonwood Farms . Board of 725^P 2d 57, affirmed Corers of rson 763 County, App. 1986. 551. 2. Zoning Application of Preservation Act to rezoning request did not result in denial of all reason - JOINT REVIEW PROCESS ARTICLE 10 Colorado Joint Review Process Section 34-10-101. Legislative declaration. 34-10-102. Colorado joint review process. 34-10-103. Duties of the Colorado joint review process. 34-10-103.5. Fees for utilization of process --cash fund —creation —general fund ap- propriations. 34-10-104. Legislative review —termination of functions. Law Review Commentaries Colorado's Water Resources. D. Monte Pas- coe, 55 U.Colo.LRev. 391 (1984). § 34-10401. Legislative declaration The general assembly hereby finds, determines, and declares that continued beneficial development of its natural resources, including water resources, is important to the state of Colorado; that the many governmental permits and licenses to be obtained by a natural resources developer can cause confusion and delay; that the jurisdictional integrity of each unit and agency of local, state, and federal government must be 92 maintained; and that an agency of 1 9:1249' GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Zoning and Planning *79, 285. WESTLAW Topic No. 414, Special use permits 1 § 34-1-305 Library References CJS. Zoning and Land Planning §§ 25, 63. 128. Notes of 1. Special use permits Board of county commissioners of county that was not `populous" was not required to have a master plan for mineral extraction and, therefore. in ruling on special use permit for gravel excavation, the board was required to follow only the county zoning resolution, and its denial of a prior request for such permit did not bar it from ranting a subsequent applica• tion therefor. Hudspeth v. Board of County Decisions Cotn•rs of Routt County, App.1983. 667 P.2d 775. Because the policies expressed in'unofficial" master plan for extraction of minerals were consistent with statute, the trial court properly concluded, on petition seeking review of coun• ty board's decision to grant a special use per. mit for gravel excavation, that informal consid. oration of those guidelines was not an abuse of the board's discretion. Hudspeth v. Board of County Com'rs of Routt County, App.1983, 667 P.2d 775. § 34-1-305. Preservation of commercial mineral deposits for extraction (1) After July 1, 1973, no board of county commissioners, governing body of any city and county, city, or town, or other governmental authority which has control over zoning shall, by zoning, rezoning, granting a variance, or other official action or inaction, permit the use of any area known to contain a commercial mineral deposit in a manner which would interfere v7th the present or future extraction of such deposit by an extractor. (2) After adoption of a master plan for extraction for an area under its jurisdiction, no board of county commissioners, governing body of any city and county, city, or town, or other governmental authority which has control over zoning shall, by zoning, rezoning, granting a variance, or other official action or inaction, permit the use of any area containing a commercial mineral deposit in a manner which would interfere with the present or future extraction of such deposit by an extractor. (3) Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit a board of county commissioners, a governing body of any city and county, city, or town, or any other governmental authority which has control over zoning from zoning or rezoning land to permit a certain use, if said use does not permit erection of permanent structures upon, or otherwise permanently2rrecludc the extraction of commercial mineral deposits by an extractor from, land subject to said use. (4) Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit a board of county commissioners, a governing body of any city and county, city, or town, or other governmental authority which has control over zoning from zoning for agricultural use, only, land not otherwise zoned on July 1, 1973. (5) Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit a use of zoned land permissible under the zoning governing such land on July 1, 1973. (6) Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit a board of county commissioners, a governing body of any city and county, city, or town, or any other governmental authority from acquiring property known to contain a commercial mineral deposit and using said property for a public purpose; 191 931249 e LA REPAY TO ATTENTION 0/ DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS. OMAHA DISTRICT TRI.LAKES PROJECT OFFICE 9307 STATE HWY 121 LITTLETON. COLORADO 80123.6901 September 20, 1993 Mr. Keith A. Schuett Weld County Department of Planning Services Weld County Administrative Offices 1400 North 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 Dear Mr. Schuett: This concerns your case number S-344, The Villa at Greeley, Inc., located in Section 2, Township 2 North, Range 68 West, Weld County, Colorado. Your project has been reviewed in accordance with Section 404 of the Clean Water Act under which the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers regulates the discharge of dredged and fill material into waters of the United States including wetlands. Reference is made to a September 15, 1993 wetlands determination conducted by Mr. Terry McKee of this office. During Mr. McKee's site visit, it was found that no wetlands exist at this site. This letter is to inform you that the proposed activity, assigned number 199380610, will not require a Department of the Army (DA) Permit. Although a DA Permit will not be required for the project, this does not eliminate the requirement that other applicable federal, state, and local permits be obtained as required. If there are any further questions concerning this matter, please feel free to contact Mr. Terry McKee of this office at 303-979-412C. Sincerely, Timo Car Project anager 1- 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 STATE OF COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Region 4 1420 2nd Street P.O. Box 850 Greeley. Colorado 80432.0850 (303)3534212 September 17, 1993 Weld Co., EFR 1-25 Del Camino Prerelease Cntr PUD (Fort Junction Filing #1) 1/2 Mi. N. of WCR 24 Del Camino Mr. Keith A. Schuett - Current Planner Weld County Dept. of Planning Services 1400 N. 17th Ave. Greeley CO 80631 Dear Keith, I have reviewed the Del Camino Prerelease Center PUD, (Fort Junction Filing #1) submittal. I have had some prior verbal communications in regard to this development, but offer these remarks based strictly upon the proposal as received. I offer the following comments in regard to the Center and the Fort Junction overall development: ROW and FUTURE ALIGNMENT OF EFR The submittal includes two documents from the Department relating to these issues. The first, (Exhibit Item 4A of the bound document), a letter I prepared dated May 21, 1993, accurately states our position in regard to future construction of the newly aligned EFR, and documents the required 80 foot right-of-way dedication which must be made by the property owner for that new alignment. As explained, this is a reversal of a prior position, which required construction (or guarantee of construction) of that portion of the frontage road by the property owner. Exhibit Item 9, paragraph 6, accurately interprets my letter in regard to this issue. The second document, (Exhibit Item 41,1), a August. 17, 1993 from Mr. David Davis, explains the status of final planning for that realignment. I have spoken today with the design engineer for the project, Mr. Dave Forsyth, who says that the alignment question is to be resolved in the immediate future. I will promptly provide you a copy of that design upon its completion. It should be noted by both the County and the owners of the Fort Junction property that although the Department has clearly committed to the construction of the newly aligned frontage road, we have not made a commitment to construct auxiliary lanes which are necessary to serve development along the state highway, as would be required by the State Highway Access Code. The submittal includes a Traffic i /5 9Z11249 1 1 1 1 MR. KEITH SCHUETT September 17, 1993 Page 2 of 4 Del Camino Prerelease Center Impact Study (TIS) based upon data previously provided to the Department by Felsburg, Holt and Ulevig for our interchange improvement planning process. The TIS evaluates the need for auxiliary lanes as related to the development of the Center, and states that although a continuous right deceleration lane is warranted by 1996, it is not planned to be constructed as a part of this development. Rather, as stated on page 10 of that document, "the design, construction, and timing for the right turn deceleration lane should be fully coordinated". The issue of who constructs that lane remains to be resolved. i am currently pursuing resolution of the Department's position. It must be noted, that if our position is that the lanes made necessary by development must be constructed or guaranteed by the property owner, the State Highway Access Permit required for construction of access from the frontage road must include those plans, along with a full description of the construction staging which will occur. The TIS attributes the need for a deceleration lane to the volume of traffic along the roadway, rather than to the site generated traffic, and places the timing of the need for that lane in approximately the same schedule as the future highway improvements. It would seem reasonable to delay construction of any frontage road improvements by the applicant until such time as the Department's construction project would occur. The Del Camino Center lies just north of the expected point of realignment; therefore, the existing frontage road adjacent to the Center may not be affected directly by the highway improvements. However, the features of a deceleration lane would begin to the south and within the limits of the realigned portion. As the horizontal and vertical alignments are yet undetermined, the applicant should be prepared to provide adequate additional ROW, if necessary, in order to construct the auxiliary lane and maintain the required roadway, slope, and drainage template. ACCESS The two proposed accesses have been positioned with approximately 580 foot spacing, which meets the minimum requirement of 550 feet, as stated in Section 4.9.2 of the SHAG. (It should be noted that Exhibit Item 9 of the submittal states a minimum requirement of 500 foot spacing. This is in error.) The north access shall not be positioned any closer than the approximate 210 feet south of the county road centerline, as shown in the Plans. Specifics of access 9Z1249 r I 1 I 1 1 1 1 MR. KEITH SCHUETT September 17, 1993 Page 3 of 4 Del Camino Prerelease Center design have not yet been provided for review. Exhibits 18A and 188 provide copies of the access applications. Item 16 of the application requests traffic information for the generator. Both applications show the same traffic data. I request clarification that, indeed, there are to be 65 total vehicles counts per access per day (rather than a total of 65 counts split between the two accesses). It is not possible to make this determination by referencing the TIS, as the data provided there on page 5 is presented as peak hour data. The TIS evaluation of the need for auxiliary lanes is provided on page 8, and states that only a right decel lane is warranted. My investigation shows that, in fact, there appears to be a "borderline" need for a left deceleration lane. Further thought must be given to the need for this lane. The dimensions for the right decel (given on page 8) do not agree with the requirements of the SHAG. The accesses and auxiliary lanes must be designed in accordance with the specifications provided by Chapter 4 of the SHAC. The surfacing information provided on sheet Al appears to be adequate. ' Access needs for further development of the Fort Junction property should be closely coordinated with this office. The frontage road is categorized as a Category 5 highway. Section 3.8 of the SHAC provides guidelines for access requests on a roadway of this type. DRAINAGE The Drainage Plan includes 30" culverts for the access locations. The culvert type has not been designated. We require that any culvert which falls within the ROW be CMP or CSP, rather than concrete. The drainage structure for the detention system at the SW corner must be positioned in such a way as to be maintained fully by the owner at a point outside of the state's ROW. LANDSCAPING There are no plantings other than grass in or near the ROW. Sight distance will not be effected. Any landscaping features within the ROW must be maintained by the adjacent property owner. UTILITIES Any new utility lines or connections which occur within the state highway ROW will require a Utility Permit. Mr. Henry Rangel of this office can be contacted at 350-2111 in regard to the necessary permit. My comments are based upon the submittal as received September 8, 1993. 1 9u:1249 1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 MR. KEITH SCHUETT September 17, 1993 Page 4 of 4 Del Camino Prerelease Center Thank you for the opportunity to review the Planned Unit Development Final Plan (Fort Junction, Filing #1 and Del Camino Prerelease Center PUD). Please contact me at 350-2163 if you have any questions. TGJ xc: D. Yost M. Fanning file D. Davis/D. Forsyth Sincerely, Teres Region Developme Jones ccess Coordinator 931249 COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS 1 1 1 e 1 I I I I I FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL DATE' oo�� TIME: COPIES SENT (INCLUDE THIS FORM) ,D 1\ TO: FRO V1e.4,, ,, - nY%ItS M: 2 Y'coo,, LONG DISTANCE ACCESS CODE (IF NECESSARY) I PHONE NO. (NOT FAX NUMBER) FAX NO. • osi p„ Vk!ONE NO. PRIORITY- Q ADDR lEE WILL PICKUP TIFY ADDRESSEE O DELIVER WITHIN 4 HOURS COMMENTS I A a4'S' on IM back of Ihh Vorm Indlcob* your &ca nlb hi■ boon oont 92,1249 rwnv Iowa fli 1 1 '1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DIVISION Civic Center Complex / Longmont, CO 80501 (303) 651-8330 / FAX # (303) 651.8696 September 15, 1993 Mr. Keith A. Schuett, Current Planner Weld County Department of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 RE: CASE NUMBER: S-344 Dear Keith: SEP.2ti1993'll _....4.7?laaniag Thank you very much for sending the Ft. Junction PUD, First Filing - Final Plan to the City of . Longmont for our review and comment. The 22 acre± site is the northern portion of the PUD and is located at the southeast corner of the east 1-25 frontage road and WCR 24 1/2. The applicant proposes to construct an 123,000 sq. ft. prerelease center on the western half of the 22 acres±. According to the application materials, the prerelease center is a minimum security correctional facility that provides a wide range of programming intended to assist offenders in their transition back into the community. The prerelease center will serve 3(X1 offenders who have an average of 90 days left to serve on their sentences. I understand that the proposed land use is consistent with the PUD and the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. Therefore the focus of Longmont's comments is on site design: specifically access and landscaping. Since this final plan is the first in this PUD, it seems appropriate at this time to determine and show the local circulation system within the entire PUD and designating access points to the surrounding street system. Then parcels, such as the one under review now, could take access from local streets internal to the PUD rather than each parcel taking access directly from the frontage road. While the City recognizes that the intent of frontage roads is to serve adjacent land uses, they should not be the only point of access. Weld County may also want to consider having at least the northern access relocated to WCR 24 1/2. If this occurs, please consider requiring the paving of WCR 24 1/2. The City understands that there will be a continuous right turn deceleration lane at some point in the future. In the interim, Weld County may want to require adequate shoulders to accommodate right turning vehicles as well as to accommodate bicyclists. 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 This site is in the heart of Del Camino. It is both Del Camino's and Longmont's interests that the 1-25 corridor present a good visual image to businesses considering relocation to our area and to visitors. Therefore, the City respectfully suggests that the final plan include bcrming around the parking area and more landscaping to screen vehicles. The application indicates that Fairway Crested Wheat is the grass proposed around the parking area and along the frontage road. The City's experience with this grass is that it grows in bunches and does not provide a consistent ground cover. We suggest Weld County require other grass varieties which provides better coverage. If you have any questions about this referral response, please call either Froda Greenberg or me at 651-8330. Thank you again for the opportunity to comment on this PUD Final Plan. Sincerely,, Brad Schol Planning Director xc: Phil DelVecchio, Community Development Director Michael Brand, The Villa at Greeley, Inc. File: #2050-2c2 9;1249 1 1 1 e 1 1 1 TRI-AREA PLANNING COMMISSION P.O. BOX 383 FREDERICK, COLORADO 80530 September 20, 1993 Mr. Greg Thompson Department of Planning Services Weld County Administrative Offices 1400 North 17 Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Mr. Thompson Re: The Villa at Greeley, Inc. Case Number 8-344 °Eck SEP211993 We!dteeny ManaiAi At the special meeting to consider the above captioned application, the Tri-Area Planning Commission voted to recommend that the application be rejected. Economic development efforts are directed toward light industrial and commercial activities along the 1-25 corridor. These objectives are expressed in the appropriate comprehensive plans, or being presently implemented. By associating "criminal", "prison", "preparole", etc. descriptions, possible dissimilar development might be negatively impacted. Further detrimental results are anticipated if like institutions are allowed in the area, using this activity's existence as leverage. Considerable uncertainty is apparent regarding the state governments' ability to expand associated activities of a like or more onerous nature. Safety considerations included the horrendous traffic dangers at Del Camino, as a result of past approvals. Although the DOT plans on rebuilding the intersection, the construction cycles are concurrent and only add to the already dangerous traffic. Further concerns were expressed regarding the Sheriff departments' inability to respond adequately to Southwest Weld calls without adding the potential demands of this type of facility. Submitted 20 September, 1993. JC:la J y H. Curtis, Chairman Tri-Area Planning Commission 9u 1249 Ott% NODScown I 1 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303) 353-3845, EXT. 3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 1400 N. 17TH AVENUE GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 Date: September 3, 1993 CASE NUMBER: S-344 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from The Villa at Greeley, Inc., c/o John T. Coppom, Administrator for a Planned Unit Development Final Plan (Ft. Junction, First Filing). The parcel of land is described as part of the SW4 of Section 2, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is south of and adjacent to Weld County Road 24-1/2 and east of and adjacent to the east I-25 Frontage Road. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by September 17, 1993, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Keith A. Schuett, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our. Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons; 3. L" We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Please refer to //the enclosed letter. 1 Signet C� 1.00 -e -47 -0: --Agency: Date; /V- �7 ve,MPan5tyPlanning 00/21/93 09:31 0303 'q3 7702 lint VIER FIRE PD 0002 t ' COLORADO y 4, DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303) 3533345, Dot 3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 1400 N. lint AVENUE GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 September 9, 1993 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCIGUI: Enclosed is an application Pros John Parrott, Attorney at Yaw, for a Service Plan for organtaation of the Thompson Rivers Park and Recreation District. Tha area this District would encompass would be the'boundaries of the RE -5J School District Within Vold County. more or loss. ' This application is submitted to you for review and recommondation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure Se prompt consideration of your recommendation_ Please reply by II �;t' September1'7 1993 so that wo may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Keith A. Schuett, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. IICheck the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. Ve have reviewed this request and find that it ' does/does not) complywith our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. I 1 1 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (ts/ia not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: 3.,, We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5.� Please refer to the enclosed letter. ilk\Signed: Agency: .a.4 ay tq•_v.. `'¢crs-tC zm @ Date: Q-5-\-a"'a SEP 21 '93 09:33 303 651 7702 . PrCE.O02 9A 9(j 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 MOUNTAIN VIEW FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Administrative Office: 700 Weaver Park Road • Longmont, CO 80501 (303) 772-0710 Metro (303) 666-4404 September 13, 1993 Mr. Keith A. Schuett, Current Planner Weld County Department of Planning Services 1400 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 RE: Case Number S-344 Del Camino PreRelease Center Dear Mr. Schuett: I have reviewed this proposal and have had several meetings with Loren Bley, the architect for the facility. The Fire District has approved the plot plan, and the utility and drainage plan. The District's comments are contained in the letter of August 9, 1993, which is included in the Final Plan document. The Fire District has no objections to the facility as long as the facility meets the requirements of the adopted codes and standards of the District. The Fire District is particularly concerned with having good access to the site, since this facility will be a target hazard for the District. Two separate access routes are needed into the site, including access to the East Frontage Road from both Highway 66 and Highway 119. The plan the District has approved will meet those access requirements. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Charles E. Boyes Fire Prevention Specialist CC: Jerry Ward, Chief of the District William N. Bailey, Deputy Chief, Support Services Mark A. Lawley, Assistant Chief, Fire Prevention Stamm 1 9$ 19 CMy one R9. Longman,. CO 90501 Maim 2 10971 MICA $3 Longman, CO 60520 81009 0 P.O. Boa 675 299 Palmer An. Maul, CO 60502 5wlon 4 P.O. Boa 11 6500 Naval Apo NMa6 CO 60644 EP 977 it fsEQ 1 • In, 1,.... =f Manama Swan 5 5100a 0 swan 7 10211 Dobb9 Rol P.O. Boa 466 P.O. 90220 Llne. CO . 600 Rom 1wSo rmwl A. 600th Ens. CO 60516 Dacono, CO 605'4 9Z1249 f_mEmoRnnnDum WIIDeTo Marini -lag DNS CaprAmhnY 111, 1441 Keith Schuett COLORADO Fpm Don -1d Csrroll (�1V subj.ct: The Villo at CrnAley c_W4 1 1 1 1 1 I have visited the site and reviewed the final plans. The main access appears to be from the east frontage road of I-25 and State Highway 119 at the Del 'Camino exit. Weld County Road (WCR) 24.5 borders on the north and WCR 24 borders on the south. The state will be reconfiguring the I-25 and 119 Del Camino interchange in the future. On the plans, the applicant is showing a frontage road right-of-way to be dedicated by the owner which ties into WCR 24 east of the existing intersection. My question is, will that point match the new designed intersection, and if the applicant plans to develop and build that frontage road at the same time he is building the facility? If so, the applicant needs to supply an intersection detailed drawing at that particular location. DC/pds:mscheutt5 cc; Commissioner Baxter File S-344 121 144;,7rr ilimaa;ng (� 1249Q JAi•lA:' 1[�7 iWIDc. II COLORADO 1 1 1 1 RECEIVED SEP 0 3 1993 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303)353.3345,0(T. E7(T. 3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 1400 N.17TH AVENUE GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 Date: September 3, 1993 CASE NUMBER: S-344 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from The Villa at Greeley, Inc., c/o John T. Coppom, Administrator for a Planned Unit Development Final Plan (Ft. Junction, First Filing). The parcel of land is described as part of the SW4 of Section 2, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is south of and adjacent to Weld County Road 24-1/2 and east of and adjacent to the east I-25 Frontage Road, This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by September 17, 1993, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Keith A. Schuett, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: 3. We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be 1 submitted to you prior to: `1 5. '/ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Signed: /9nWL"anjze/ Date: 9_1a- 93 Agency: /20244m;47 If a1`%'' COLORADO I 1 1 1 memoeanDum Keith Schuett Weld County Planning Date From Eublset: Jeffrey L. Stoll, Supervisor, Environmental Health // U /, Case Number: S-344 Name: The Villa at tow nc. c/o John T. Coppom SEP 10199 3) Weihl P ty Isaniog September 10, 1993 Environmental Protection Services has reviewed this proposal; the following conditions are recommended to be part of any approval: 1. All liquid and solid wastes shall be stored and removed for final disposal in a manner that protects against surface and groundwater contamination. 2. No permanent disposal of wastes shall be permitted at this site. 3. The maximum permissible noise level shall not exceed the industrial limit of 80 dB(A), as meaaured according to 25-12-102, Colorado Revised Statutes. 4. The Division requires that this facility utilize existing public water supply. Plan Review for a food preparation area must be submitted for approval prior to commencement of construction. A Colorado license to operate a Food Service Establishment is required and can be obtained from the Weld County Health Department. JLS/jg-1780 921249 44 hiDe COLORADO 1 1 1 11 1 i 3 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303) 353.3845, EXT. 3540 • WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 1400 N. 17TH AVENUE GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 Date: September 3, 1993 CASE NUMBER: S-344 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from The Villa at Greeley, Inc., c/o John T. Coppom, Administrator for a Planned Unit Development Final Plan (Ft. Junction, First Filing). The parcel of land is described as part of the SW4 of Section 2, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is south of and adjacent to Weld County Road 24-1/2 and east of and adjacent to the east I-25 Frontage Road. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by September 17, 1993, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Keith A. Schuott, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons; 3. !/ We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. 5. Signed; Date: A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: refer to the enclosed letter. ----Agency: c..> seP 0 1993 Weldrouging 9Z1249 c 1,060Cin COLORADO mEmORPflDUm Keith Schuett, Current Planner September 3, 1993 To On. Ed Stoner, Lead Building Inspector Oj Flom S-344, The Villa Subject. 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I'1 The Department of Building Inspection has reviewed the site plan for this facility and have the following concerns; 1. The facility shall be provided with handicap accessibility as required in Chapter 31 of the 1991 Uniform Building Code. 2. Exterior fenced enclosures into which exits from a building terminate, shall be provided with a safe dispersal area located a minimum of 50 feet from the building. Dispersal areas shall be based upon no less than 3 square feet per occupant. A gate shall be provided from this dispersal area to allow for necessary relocation. Weld County planning 911244 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303) 353.3845, EXT. 3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 1400 N.17TH AVENUE GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 COLORADO September 3, 1993 1 1 1 1 1 The Villa at Greeley, Inc. c/o John T. Coppom, Administrator 1750 6th Avenue. Greeley, CO 80631 Subject: S-344 - Request for a Planned Unit Development Final Plan (Ft. Junction, First Filing) on a parcel of land described as part of the SW4 of Section. 2, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. Dear Mr. Coppom: Your application and related materials for the request described above are complete and in order at the present time. I have scheduled a meeting with the Weld County Planning Commission for October 5, 1993, at 1:30 p.m. This meeting will take place in the County Commissioners' Hearing Room, first floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado. It is recommended that you and/or a representative be in attendance to answer any questions the Planning Commission members might have with respect to your application. In addition, I have scheduled a meeting with the Weld County Utilities Advisory Committee for Thursday, September 23, 1993, at 10:00 a.m. This meeting will take place in the Weld County Administrative Offices, 1400 N. 17th Avenue, Greeley, Colorado. It is the policy of Weld County to refer an application of thisnature to any town or municipality lying within three miles of the property in question or if the property under consideration is located within the comprehensive planning area of a town or municipality. Therefore, our office has forwarded a copy of the submitted materials to the City of Longmont, Town of Mead, and Tri-Area Planning Commissions for their review and comments. Please call Brad Schol, in Longmont, at 651-8330 and Bertina Willden, in Mead, at 535-4477, and Jay Curtis, Tri-Area, at 833-3819, for further details regarding the date, time, and place of these meetings. It is recommended that you and/or a representative be in attendance at the Longmont, Mead, and Tri Area Planning Commission Meetings to answer any questions the Commission members may have with respect to your application. It is the responsibility of an applicant to see that a sign is posted on the property under consideration at least 10 days preceding the hearing date. Sometime prior to September 22, 1993, you or a representative should call me to obtain three signs to be posted on the site no later than September 24, 1993: The sign shall be posted adjacent to and visible from all publicly maintained road right-of-way. In the event the property under consideration is not adjacent to a publicly maintained road right- of-way, the applicant shall post one sign in the most prominent, place on the property The Villa at Greeley, Inc. 331249 �1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 Kelly/tiaglund/Garnsey & Kahn AIIoruie ,al I.mw Tcrrorwr K. K.IIy Jarw. W. Iluhltll Norman 9, Ilaglund Ann It. Hid. 1l'al(rr W. Gam.w1. Jr' Skeen C. I.:w. Edwin S. Kahn Hirhard V, Imp.." Tdm' IF. Hu.hion Vuli"a A. l'wurri.. ('hriuwr I...'lugrhy. al C.wohd September 8, 1993 Mr. Chuck Cunliffe, Director Dept. of Planning Services Weld County Administrative Offices 1400 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Mr. Cunliffe: My brother and I own five acres of commercial land at the intersection of 1-25 and County Road 24 (just diagonally across 1-25 from Del Camino). We have recently become aware that there is a proposal to build a minimum security facility on land to the north of the land we own. We have no objection to the rezoning of land, or such a use. In our society, there need to be facilities to handle offenders, and such a facility will not disturb any material existing residential use. Moreover, from a purely selfish standpoint, I believe our land might become more valuable as a result of this use than with the existing use of that land. ESK:sjr cc: Mr. Milt Kahn Sincerely, Edwin S. Kahn '4Wdf" ,pinning 1 (D 1441 Eightwmh Sam!' / Soh.. 1d0 Dower C'ol a rdo X021 .1 'M I'h / 303 / 296.4412 I :% .' 303 /291-K705 a:11.249 1s 1 goc20 Iw?3 SEP 2c1 !'i 9= 36 CLEM 4:' LD C01; 1TY Sei• —7./ .,_/993:1 M/J i �i Jim .7 /Cd/ . 'i/ . Iw�.i /� to Wewc000trvi. r - - w. -• v adiALLA • i / .mow..¢...._ �. .7: --g 3.3 sa.20a r Weld County Department Of Planning Services 1400 N. 17th Avenue Greely, Colorado 80631 Weft! ree, shig ber 21, 1993 Attn: Shirty Camenisch. Bud Clemons. Don Feldhouse. Jean Hoffman, Richard Kimmel. Juliet Kroekel. Bill O'Hare, Tom Rulon. Judy Yamaguchi RE: Proposed Del Camino Pre -Parole Prison Facility Dear members of the Department of Planning Services. This letter Is in regards to plans of The Villa Company of Greely to place a "pre -parole" (prison) facility in south west Weld county in the vicinity of Del Camino. We are two of the approximately 1.400 people described by John Coppmon of The Villa as "hysterical". "contentious", and "outspoken", members of the public who have signed a petition opposing the location of this prison in our community. In June, we attended a meeting sponsored by the Concerned Citizens Group of Del Camino regarding the planned prison facility and were pleased to see that attendance at this meeting left standing room only. Following the meeting at Rinn Church, we have read several newspaper articles which have depicted this facility as a harmless Job generating facility that will only house "non-violent" offenders. As more people have began to investigate this facility it has become clear that some of the people housed in the facility will in fact be repeat offenders of violent crimes. However, regardless of the placement of violent or non-violent offenders in this facility, what might go on inside the controlled facility does appear to be the major concern of people. A greater concern was voiced regarding changes expected outside the facility due to the visitation rights granted to prisoners friends and family. This is an extremely valid issue in our opinion and it appeared to be an issue for many of the families gathered at Rinn Church during the meeting in June. As one father asked during the meeting. "who is going to watch out for my children waiting for the school bus at the end of a long lane on a day which happens to correspond with prisoner visitation days ?". Any one who tries to tell us that the all of the people who will come to visit the prisoners are just like you and me is not facing reality. At a time when small communities all along the front range are trying to fight off the very real threat of gang infiltration. it appears that Weld County officials may endorse a plan which will assist in introducing drug dealers, gang members and their friends and families to our rural communities. We realize that police protection In Weld County is limited by the sheer size of the county and by financial constraints and do not believe that the Sheriffs Department will be able to provide the increased enforcement that will be required by persons "outside" the facility. It is our opinion that the south-west portion of Weld County, if properly managed, will continue to attract businesses and organizations which will yield both a positive image and economic benefit to Weld County while still maintaining the rural character of this area. SC 1249 Although the prison facility may provide a short term economic benefit to the county and local area, we do not feel that this short term return is worth the potential negative long term impacts that will be generated by the facility. Although local residents and business may become accustomed to living next to a "pre -parole" facility, newcomers and potential new businesses will view the facility as a prison, plain and simple! Their first impressions will be identical to the first impressions of the 1,400 people who have signed the petition. Common sense dictates that most families or businesses, given a choice, would prefer to be in a community that does not have a prison versus one that doesli! We do not view ourselves or other members of this community as hysterical. contentious. or outspoken. We simply agree along w th 1.400 other people that a prison is not in the best interest of Del Camino or any other surrounding communities. It appears that our only option for preventing this prison facility is to solicit support from elected Weld County officials who will make the decisions regarding this facility. We would like to make clear our direct opposition to this prison facility. We do not wish to see this type of development forced on our community and are ready to extend all necessary efforts in conjunction with the Concerned Citizens Group of Del Camino to prevent this facility. We would greatly appreciate your support and understanding in this matter and hope that you agree that the residents of any community should be allowed to make the decision on whether or not a prison facility is placed in there community. Sincerely. eIiG & Jarf .prouse Highland Lake, Colorado cc: Concerned Citizens Group of Del Camino 901249 /5")/q93 IZG�YT�c `Ww�,a 7r_. Q%-tAtbi-c4 Xot _1 N- U'e . rAire- •9,_. 2,7svw4e.r7[fit --)r-t--)-4, CAT ,??n4' 1O0,'WG 1/i/< ##�' *05019557 Wins fla I r I .3O • nnAe 11 June 17, 1993 Weld County Commissioners' Office Greeley, Colorado Attn: Constance Harbert We, as 22 -year residents of the Enchanted Hills sub- division, wish to register a strong objection to the pro- posed construction of a pre -parole prison facility at or near the "Del Camino Area". The thought of having convic- ted felons, regardless of the near -completion of their sen- tences, housed anywhere near this living area is repugnant to the vast majority of the residents of this subdivision. it is our feeling and that of the majority of the residents of this area that there is a strong element of danger invol- ed in having a facility of this type in an area that has be- come a lramily residential area". We, Therefore, strongly urge the Weld County Commission- ers to firmly reject this proposal. Thank you for your consicieaatioa, Mary Margot Mengel Alvin E. Mengel Owners and residents of 7056 Maple St. Longmont, Colorado 80504 Tel. 833 3674 931249 County Commissioners Office Attention: Constance Harbert P.O. Box 758 Greeley, CO 80632 June 8,1993 Commissioner My wife and I have just returned from a meeting of concerned residents of the SW Weld County (Del Camino) area. Our concern specifically is with continued plans to place a prison facility in our area. We would like to have you understand this is not an acceptable plan and should be stepped. We are asking you to not allow the zoning or PUD to permit this endeavor. As residents of this area we must prevail upon you and other commissioners this activity in our community is not conducive to family values. It will contribute to opening the door to unlimited crime thru drugs, uninvited visitors with poor moral values all in an environment of families with children. Our area is not structured with many of required support needs such as full time sheriff in numbers needed or visitor living needs near by or mass transportation to name a few. There is hardly enough tax moneys collected to pay their way for water, sewer, police, and fire when you consider over 306 people under one unit. Thank you for the opportunity of communicating this concern. Sincerely Robert E. Konkle Vivian J. Konkle CC: Commissioner:Bill Webster Commissioner:George Baxter Commissioner:Dale Hall Commissioner:Barb Kirkmeyer Weld Cty Dpt Planning:Chuck Cumliffe 931249 Paul and Tammy Thompson ±" 4763 Weld County Road #32 Longmont, Colorado 80504 (303) 535-4748 June 9, 1993 County Commissioners Office Attention: Constance Harbert P.O. Box 758 Greeley, CO 80632 Dear Commissioner Harbert; As property owners, residents, and especially as a family residing in Southwest Weld County we want you to know of our STRONG OPPOSITION to the construction of any correctional facility in any unincorporated area of Southwest Weld County. We are specifically opposed to the proposal to build a "pre -parole" facility in the general area of Del Camino (the intersection of Interstate 25 and Colorado 119). We feel that such a facility would be damaging not only to property values, but also to further business and residential development of the area. We chose to purchase property in this area so that we could raise our family in a rural setting, away from the high crime and increasing violence of the city. I (Paul) commute to Denver daily, and feel that is a reasonable trade-off for the freedom of a "country" way of life. We feel that the activities associated with a correctional facility, especially visitation, would attract individuals that could pose a threat to our family and property. We request and urge that you reject any and all proposals that would provide for the construction of a correctional facility designed to house convicted felons remanded to the custody of the Colorado State Department of Corrections. Sincerely, fait- (ltd,17 Paul and Tammy Thompson, and our daughters, Rebecca and Elizabeth CC': /04 931249 • -• June „) June r r••• I ll Department of Planning Services Weld County Administrative Offices 1400 17th Avenue Greeley, Co. 80631 County Commissioners, Planning and Zoning: To Whom This May Concern, 1,1993 RE: Proposed prison in the S.W. Weld County area near the Del Camino community. DISCUSSION: We the undersigned, as property owners on Weld County Road 201 along I 25, are concerned that a Private Prison is being considered for this area. We respectfully listened to Villa's presentation at the Budget Inn. CONCLUSION: Since you are our represtatives to Weld County in the capacity as Commissioners, Planning and Zoning, we request that your departments deny any applications for a prison in our areas. LAC; Cv - gG-t.IL2't cift- --' o, 7/ dO 14_ �.1Jiv�2.an�� C��u 5--‘ 42)4f ��1.'c�✓'lll"cai vCGv c • II Ule5 wC..,' ,;Q n rag Onffr Slosoy re.• Pt Respectfully Yours, • M.D.Hopper -rn,rc.c"7 4,, ' ' "U 4 k- S.K. Hoppe' ,ec. 3656 WCR 201 Longmont, Co. 80504 (303) 772-2571 Michae ag ertc_ _ �� EK?Y� 39/09 SCR #20• U Longmont, Co. 80504 (303) '71.9- 4/ I:Sit 931249 MR. AND MRS. DAVID E. KOEHLER 17940 WAGON TRAIL PLATTEVILLE., COLORADO 80651 tp/it/93 auAri a,•Il n+,ssioA)evs / OAce. 4F}t'.v'fwuU: CCUNS^%a'NCC'. I-+arber* PO /3aX 75s - .....n IC1 i;.._. .17 G•free(e.' Co 80632 Theo.- /4czrber4, Please be acllwsea ifbw+ we. a✓e aeaIAut 4k.I p ropor'n ; CDNswiruC�r0A1 a j• a. torso& corrc` IIO.vct 1 -Cc:KA{i 1I4-7 4o 6e. lava IA) 4k turiersh'{e 2 S RI WIovGtt0 II? arPq or /N ON/ NN/NCo ✓/iora4d gyp2 �$ So.A-k, wes-I- lurid Cousrby. Please r )&+ am/ oA.ci a/I proposals rag, 4r SattL 4 4c4 lI'ly S/A,cere (y , atvC. Kat 9:fitC1 (l((,,- 931249 MIMES 08 June 93 011621 WCR 13 Longmont, CO 80504 County Commissioners Office Attention: Constance Harbert MP. 0. Box 758 Greeley CO 80632 r. ea.:, CC .. llIn the near future you may be asked to consider the construction of a pre -parole facility in the Del Camino community --in the general area Mof Interstate 25 and Colorado 119.(Weld County Road 24.) I have had the opportunity to attend meetings concerning this proposal; the initial meeting being organized the by the developers Mand proponents of this venture. In each case, it has been very apparent that the members of the community are unequivocally opposed' to this project. While my initial perceptions were neutral, as I Illsecured more information on the impacts of such a facility it became obvious that this type of facility has significant negative impacts on the community over the long term. MSimilar facilities have been proposed along the front range recently. In at least nine (9) communities, including three in Weld County, the IIlocal governments have investigated and evaluated similar proposals. After careful consideration, each of these governments has voted not to approve this type of facility in their communities. The overwhelming factor was that the short-term economic benefits of such IIa facility are overwhelmed by the long-term negative impacts on the surrounding area. IIIThe operators of The Villa facility in Greeley, were unable generate enough support in the Greeley area to secure approval for a pre -parole facility --even though they have been operating in Greeley for a number of years. Basically, it comes down to the fact that their past IIperformance does not generate confidence on the part of the Greeley community to be allowed the opportunity to locate this facility in the area. rBased on the negative response in the Greeley area, these individuals pursued similar opportunities in the Evans and Windsor areas, where 'they met with similar rejection by the local governments. Now, they are bypassing the incorporated areas, and pursuing their agenda in unincorporated Weld County where the community is more dispersed and organized resistance is perceived to be less of an issue. The ',underlying intention is that the Weld County government may be more likely to approve their proposal. ecognizing the fact that you will have a difficult decision to make regarding the proposed development, I have researched this, agenda and have identified the following factors: 1. The concept of pre -parole facilities is new to the State of Colorado. Legislation approving this concept has only 5 been in place for less than two years. 2. The proposed facility in Weld County is effectively an 04,193 9149A4 "experiment". whi._ references are made to 5. .liar facilities in other states, no similar facility exists in Colorado. 3. Under the law authorizing creation of pre -parole facilities, they will be required to take any and all offenders, including those with violent histories. Should any incidents occur inside the facility, support will be provided from Canon City (about 3 hours travel time). 4. The residents of this facility are felonious offenders. The statement that these individuals are "non-violent", reflects only the fact that they have not been CONVICTED of violent offenses. Research shows that those involved in drug trafficking are likely to have committed violent acts which are not able to be "proven beyond a reasonable doubt" for conviction. Nonetheless, their activities in the past indicate that they may be prone to or have participated in violent activities if only by their participation in drug -related activities. It should be noted here that a large percentage of drug offenders are not typically remanded to the custody of the Department of Corrections. Those individual that are,have exhausted the legal system to the point where incarceration was the only alternative. Many, if not most, are repeat offenders, and ALL are FELONS. 5. The classification (Class I -V) of a prisoner is as much a reflection of a persons ability to conform to standards of behavior within the corrections system, as it is the activity that caused them to be remanded to the custody of the state. The ability to follow corrections guidelines and regulations, interact appropriately with corrections officers, and the evaluations of corrections mental health professionals (an in -exact science at best) may reflect the the classification of inmates as well --regardless of their intial offense(s). 6. The impact on the community transcends the facility itself, as the inmates have visitation privileges. In both Ordway and Limon, law enforcement has noted that the traffic for visitors to the facilities is reflected in increased drunk -driving offenses, possession of contraband (e.g. drugs) and other offenses. This undoubtedly is reflected by The Villa's admission that dogs will be used to search the facility for contraband. This contraband is provided typically by visitors to the facility. In Limon, the court case load has increased significantly as any offenses inside the facility must be adjudicated in the county court system. The county has had to measureably increase their investments in security at the courts due to the volume and types of offenses perpetrated in the facility. 7. In speaking with individuals in Ordway, the economic benefits anticipated by the corrections facility have not materialized. This has been due to the fact that employees Q2 7'19 of the facility, w....le residing within the ca. .ating limitations established, have chosen to live in communities outside the Ordway area. If one would extrapolate a similar impact in Southern Weld County, employees commuting 20-30 minutes could reside in Longmont, Loveland, Boulder, Northglenn and Thornton. Weld County would, in fact, assume all of the risks while hoping the few benefits actually materialize. The issues concerned with development in our county are extremely complex. The concept of balancing the economic demands and the Mharmonious development of the county need to be adhered to under the terms of the comprehensive plan. Exceptions to the comprehensive plan should be diligently explored as to their impacts and long-term Illimplications for the county. As you are asked to evaluate the concept of any corrections related gracility in the county, you are asked to keep the following criteria foremost in your mind: 1. Since Weld County has significantly less population than those counties to its west and south, are we prepared to assume responsibility for managing and supporting the undesirable elements generated in those counties, or for that matter, the State of Colorado? We have to determine if Weld County is prepared to assume as disproportionate part of the burden for the State. Can we afford to sacrifice control over our own lives because Weld County is prepared to relieve the metro areas of their problems? 2. Other counties have invited development based on perceived economic benefits, only to find the benefits are short-lived and the impacts are long term. A. The mountain communities that endorsed gambling have now found their communities are changed forever. The impacts on traffic, law enforcement, pollution and other factors are only now being realized and it's too late to turn back the clock. B. The town of Ordway, has not experienced the rush economic development anticipated. In fact, the general feeling is that should Ordway have the opportunity to make the decision over again, the population would NOT support the construction of the corrections facility in their community. C. I have addressed the court case issue in Limon earlier in Item 6 above. 3. Is Weld County prepared to experiment with the pre -parole concept, before the Department of Corrections has finalized their agenda and conducted public review? Without all of the facts, we may be endorsing a concept that once implemented is difficult (or impossible) to remedy. 931249 a M • U r U U U U I r I I r 1 1 The potential exis.., to support development of y to realize that the business concept has changed as it is implemented. Once construction begins, it is virtually impossible to stop the process. The business charter proposed by The Villa is premature. The administrative and financial considerations, under the House Bill authorizing the pre -parole concept, may be modified at any time to suit the needs of the State --leaving Weld County having to react to the fiat of legislative committees and lobbyists. History shows that the state legislature is sometimes extremely insensitive to the constraints under which county and local governments operate. Addtionally, The Villa does not have a contract with the State. The business plan assumes the services contract will be awarded if they can show they have all of the approvals. 4. The overall tax revenue to the county is minimal. Based on a $10,000,000 construction cost (The Villa's number), a taxable value of 29% (or $2.9 million), and a mill levy of 122.839 will yield tax revenues of $356,231 annually. When one applies the public services required to support the proposed facility, the incremental revenue provided does not begin to approach the costs of additional police, road, and other public services required in the area. When adding costs for additional requirements made on the justice system -- it is painfully obvious that all citizens of Weld County will have to sacrifice --while a very few benefit. When providing these incremental services within an incorpora- ted area, the associated costs are considerably less due to the fact that the infrastructure is already in place and/or the utilization of such services is high enough to justify the cost. In Weld County, few communities are positioned to assume this cost as evidenced by the recent decisions of Greeley, Windsor and Evans to veto this type of facility. S. Under the growth policies detailed in the Weld County Comprehensive Plan, a proposed use must determined to be consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan. New development in the Del Camino area has been reasonably compatible with existing development. The corridor has been able to support a variety of commercial and industrial activities while minimizing the impacts on agricultural or residential interests. The proposed correction facility seriously compromises the relationship among the interests residing in the area. A. The facility as proposed by The Villa, is unique in that it cannot be categorized under the traditional definitions of industrial or commercial. B. The initial site proposed by The Villa will require a special use permit since it is proposed in an area designated for Medium Density Residential (MDR) and will be immediately adjacent to single family 931249 r r r r dwellings. C. Regardless of where the facility is located in the area, impacts on the local residents relative to traffic flows on visitation days, security/fencing, lighting, and construction will be considerable. Consideration relative to the impacts on the individuals and businesses that have made significant property investments must take precedence since many of the investments were made prior to the development of the comprehensive plan in 1987, and subsequently under terms of its adoption. 4. The final decision must reflect a high sensitivity to the wishes of the surrounding community. S. The county has little or no ability to protect the community from the "associates" of the inmates who visit the facility --many of whom will have criminal records. The exposure the residents and business owners in the area will assume transcends the ability of Weld County to protect their interests. Ultimately, the Commissioners must make a decision that reflects the nterests of those immediately impacted and all residents of Weld County. Based on the criteria detailed above, I encourage the Planning Commission and the Commissioners to reject any proposal for the construction of a correctional facility in the Del Camino area specifically, and Weld County in general. While I recognize that in the future conditions may warrant a re-examination of this rissue, at this time I feel that the best interests of Weld County are served by not approving any business proposal of this nature. Sincerely, Frank M. Canepa 11303/651-0584 931249 1 1. 1 We, the undersigned, residents of Southwest Weld County, hereby make. "mown to the People of Weld County, CO, the Weld County Planning ommission and County Commissioners, of our opposition to the proposed construction of a correctional facility to be located in the general vicinity of the I-25 Mixed Use Development Area (commonly cferred to as Del Camino, and more specifically in the area of nterstate 25 and Colorado 119) or in any unincorporated area of Southwest Weld County. Ie petition our Commissions to reject any and all proposals that would provide for the construction of a correctional facility designed to Irouse convicted felons remanded to the custody of the Colorado State epartment of Corrections. PEOPLES PETITION TO THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PLANNING COMMISSION & COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Name (Signature) Mailing Address City ZIP "1'4- e eer /.yy lfc, .5-07 r(•1 /OP L: ROY.?c^. ,/,€), stoic 4./&?> /Deg c 6' 1- 03. 4. S. r,. 1 :r1A J;. MVO 4.c cS 44%{x../,4 50651 /67%1 kir 2 , S/ P// trace 'P/ jet//_-evcF7 p0Buzy Wegka„. ()Alto( 80sql- _ t A Y 3-4c 7 .1.1;) rter fen 0) was r pal 2-S "_ rilz;4rl S-09/)-, cg o- p /) /-.li7f`.c.v.�(i to 6 i I /217E- J7 a JWPA fr o ATh iIJ?O iJ{: %v'Oz eiteas"v/.4 S1za ( - e te . Po n 4/ iiW4t L �,0. qon s-r6i Nttt‘, N 4 —,( /4-L'(6'/ )4,t :erW 7f f}t %?,j,rJitfrl�� 931249 1 e 1 :0PLES PETITION TO THE WEI: COUNT.':. COLORADO PLANNING COMMISSION 6 COUNT: COMMISSIONERS the undersigned, residents of Southwest Weld County, hereby make known to the People of Weld County, CO, the Weld County Planning Commission and County Co--,ssioners, of our opposition' to the proposed construction of a correctional facility to be located in the Igeneral vicinity of the I-25 Mixed Use Development Area (commonly referred to as Del Camino, and more specifically in the area of• Interstate 25 and Colorado 119) or in any unincorporated area of. 'Southwest Weld County. :tr petition our Commissions to reject any and all proposals that would (provide for the construction of a correctional facility designed to house convicted felons remanded to the custody of the Colorado State Department of Corrections. 1 U1. 2L 13. 4. 15. 16 7. 18. 9. 110 14 115 �7. Is. 19. 0' Name /1 (Signature) Mailing Address City ZIP ,,4 / /74 3 ?/I C• k ,e Vi . ,.7 .reirey -mazy-1 ..,fro.). / y.,,f.,, ur. c g. '2,c, �n" ,D S'e0g4 kIs ��AO711'; - 60C c.JCE' a ._. ra L c ✓ ZJ�-.+QI..o�+M-ed 'j 2 3> Al a i? der 9yfF 7 �o�.y ?L fl SA aa r t.. V? _ , _ , „ gAs vy l 71. � - Gig re- i.‘r l.- arru,t .Q/, Sy_ 44M � /7G7 41e'X-Jo_a2--._ _ kilom Reso1 ►767 Wc/ .2d '/a 1 1 ..— 4 v.c ..._ /s7so wC.ia-. Zc i/L (ov44.nw'r" ,$c'S ' _.• R`.,w �.gc,-� I (6o LOGIC JO/A...- )„,„j (05.14 1 ��,7,_ /73 r 6vc}2 Qck 74,. 4 „.egg- 'fiPcOtt- fro to ) n5-nv /? LA- fret- R X70 ) .._. m„re./- - 9F4.A..i ez/9fi/E4 244 , n y92' fa en j. a 4.- coSay d /16i. etC I :At. X _.. . egasoi/ it ecfe , 7/4 -WeR a4. .. " . _. z N '1 l *4d' Q.ti. < 9neU C ILtKIHG�-Pi '. kliriAtinetLCGLI ti . `t`ag CU e ck... / 93124. 1 I 1 'OPLES °ETITION' TO T L WELD'CO'NTY, COLORADO' PLANNING COMMISSION & COUNTY COMMISSIONERS kN'e, the undersigned, residents of Southwest Weld County, hereby make nown to the People of Weld County, CO, the weld County Planning ommission and County Commissioners, of our opposition to the proposed connstruction of a correctional-fac :.sty to be located in the eral vicinity of the 1-25 Mixed Use -Development Area (commonly_iferred to as. Del Camino, and more specifically in the area of _nterstate 25 and Colorado 119) or'in any unincorporated area of Irouthwest Weld County. petition our Commissions to reject any and all proposals that would Irovide for the construction of a correctional facility designed to .use convicted felons remanded to the custody of the -Colorado State epartment of Corrections. '1 r 1 U6.O0Q„L, Name (Signature) Mailing Address City ZIP rsoolie{?0.92 fV4,44 2A( Po. Be,* Col- Ittre *Ask CA: - Pocx' Pod /o/ i/o � .ud/JLr' C4eZ� $o //N 7 pricy `l�OA .- -c. ,A14 '?gin ildA 4:, rut 49 :OPLES PETITION TO THE WELD COUNTY; CCLORA_O PLANNING COMMISSION -& COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 1 we, the undersigned, residents of Southwest Weld County, hereby make known to the People of Weld County, CO, the Weld County planning Commission and County Commissioners, of our opposition to, the proposed construction of a correctional facility to be located in the 1 General vicinity of the I -25 -Mixed Use Development Area. -(commonly referred to as Del Camino, and more specifically in the area of. Interstate 25 and Colorado 115) or in any unincorporated area of ' Southwest Weld County. 'r:,- petition our Commissions to reject any and all proposals that would provide for the construction of a correctional facility designed. to (house convicted felons remanded.to the custody of the Colorado State. Department of Corrections. I IZG 13. 4. Ti. 16. 7. 18. 9. 110. `1. - 112. 113. 14. 115. 16( �7. 1:: 112 01 Name (Signature) Mailing Address City ZIP .1.c., uu- /74 3 ?C) C'; k 28 Vz a .r.� VC'Se .7gr 71tz,�..o-c - ? a:G?R / �` 3 w, c_ .. Si 0 I,', _ :7 a -yc Se 4 e ✓ ZJ.aQ ,0An. 9i 3> 11 Ge? er 7 . _ poa y in_sAr CJ CV �7r , gas Is/ Iti& ,Z „,,A,„nc / 71, x - w! 1Q - Ao% ,.x7;/ rne ./ 0) `PI -e(4 el, "C, .444.2e fz 4 Of... x,0,2- . Z,iuvfiOsa/ .1/rrt7, m it so l g 17 6 7 tilCR I t _..,e..:..K.;1,46, is -66 ,,.>c,1(_,,,.>c,1(_,O'/L _ %Al.953t•( � ir /7.fJ &aZpsporo) �j.. '`r ./«, z 0g9., h/c,< .2,')$- en regnit 705-67 We420 4--- tat 4-4-- ^,nr91 r� _G. -&-Yeg /..16�- (ate c g z0 e.. l84xt1 fifSl AN .27/4 WGR ,Q11' # .ccr4 u4 c, �C U 'L 9Listult` Q / LI, INc1X c�mk.4 EOPL'c.S PETITION TO THE WELD COUNTY,, COLORADO PLANNING -COMMISSION &.COUNTY COMMISSIONERS • We, the undersigned, residents of Southwest Weld County, hereby 'make known to the People of Weld County, CO, the Weld County Planning Commission and County Commissioners, of our opposition to the proposed . construction of a correctional facility to be located in. the general vicinity of the .I -2S Mi ed.Use Development Area (commonly referred to as Del Camino, and more specifically --in the area of. - Interstate 25 and Colorado 119) or in any unincorporated area of Southwest Weld County. we petition our Commissions to reject any and. all proposals that would provide for the construction of a correctional facility designed to house convicted felons remanded to the custody of the Colorado State Department of Corrections. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10 `9. Name (Signature) Mailing Address City ZIP B/s,.-4, *9s4 ie.J, c.l.4a). uc./cl1 &Arai ON; ( (A y i,ZsWA 553 •F _ 17c 4 7 .1/liV I1{J� ((>.;, �� .) Et .d2/111 z.c.ti 1 C c2 1.410 . 2.f - <— _gage iriog � ( • -‘y \ 1 s\- rcRt co.) ( 1 v 1 V x-' as 0'1-4 toSt P009,<63,8. 147-4,,7 17"--;-.), ?as -icy ay a ion la4 F ( F,.., \ ik ,.,,.J 7,:i A ,,i f . 2.r 2.607 . 'tiat4t,c_ 0`�iI , `° (� c��a�»�r7^ r f �� o CW 1,-^[� y it^ /� gyp. f'7(O t,� C� p (11' > �auo, `z ,La4OO v J . lira A-& . k zcj r� cm,, ,, : ,1O" mcf ( 1j1 _ i i i i 111 . l OI 0lP.i�l-��41 .!» c) 71.'IS fV etz 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 'OGLES PETITION TO TH_ WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PLANNING COMMISSION -& COUNTY COMMISSIONERS me, the undersigned, residents of Southwest Weld County, hereby make own to the People of Weld County, CO, the Weld County Planning ommiss-On and County Commissioners, of our opposition to the proposed construction of a correctional facility to be located in the -mineral vicinity of the I-25 mixed Jse Development Area (commonly =_erred to as Del Camino, and more specifically in the area of Interstate 25 and Colorado 115Y or in any unincorporated area oir r Weld County. on our Commissions to reject any and all proposals that would r e for the construction of a -correctional facility designed to convicted felons remanded to the custody of the Colorado State ment of Corrections. r 7. i Name (Signature) Mailing Address City ZIP Tkedi /soo4)6P022 fireala„pc,,,dze 1. lira Ckr ' retn fos'a0 C.c ice t oorl t ( nr 3rnnn i e() - --.� ..- .-. pao/of J //or Ct -.-vd4Ze C :tats alleo.uo // NC' 1 7 ;tom C35- A itig- oft, Ov\ G W.c°,R.d ato{. firs SOnei TOW( gaX/ <� f�/Xn ry gbS3i1 Ln9iwo,,r / 45y Oa,, friki eve loth in (20 GIA/ThrLD Cal Ad SO tirS ca, 4 ?nm. ilk, �-''9 °'Lc I 11�`i J/a if057 fora y gosic dseg Ye, Jonitd .15�oSr�l ' "DPLSS PETITION. TO TH1. WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, PLANNING COMMISSION _& COUNTY COMMISSIONERS We, the undersigned, residents of Southwest Weld County, heresy make known to the People of weld County, CO, the Weld County Planning Commission and County CoT^'ssiomers, of our opposition to the proposed construction of a correctional .facility to be located in the general vicinity of the 1-25 Mixed Use Development -Area (commonly referred to as Del Camino, and .more specifically in the area_of Interstate 25 and Colorado 119) or -in any unincorporated area of Southwest Weld County. We petition our Commissions to reject any and -all proposals that would provide for the construction of a correctional facility designed.;to house convicted felons remanded to the custody of -the Colorado State Department of Corrections. 3. S. V 8. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 2G. Name (Signature) llCf/kJ--72i1,�,51 -,r,a Mailing Address City ZIP P0. 3O,?. sos sd.-7/?fie2 u k 105 -3q 4rc 4//' -117 i41 -Si-. 1j f.14TA. loss* �./ ,/ RD. At./ -"s./f l'a 430 las,� p. 0 . ,2r mist oi F.ts,Gni $dS3D /881 sPRt7C6 of? ,lip- ?o Sit, ,72,7 fr 1 1 1. -.. J„ WELD .:341—ri , C:203A00 7:.;N::_. C C0:'!:•:SSION & C "0CN;Y C0a7P4ISSIJNER5 we, the undersigned, residents of Sc'.thwest Weld County, hereby make known to the *People c:CcemC County. CO, the 'geld County'Planning Commission and Commissioner:, construction of correctional of cur opposition to the proposed a `or=' -_C facility to be located in general vicinity _ - 1-25coo refer_ :he `- Mixed Use Development Area (commonly referred to as :e' Camino, ant more specifically in -'the area of Interstate 2d Sant Colorado '_13) or in any unincorporated area o; Southwest W 1'we petition our Commissions to reject provide for the construction of 'house convicted felons remanded IlDepartment of Corrections. Name (Signature) any and all proposals that would_ a correctional facility designed to to to custody of the Colorado State Mailing Address City ZIP mover wit ..wareitimfiniatarmarma. d OPLES L'PTITION T,O THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PLANNING COMMISSION & COUNTY COMMISSIONERS we, the undersigned, residents of Southwest Weld County, hereby make the known toPeople of Weld County, CO, the' weld County Planning Commission and County Commissioners, of our opposition to the proposed construction of a correctional facility to be located in the general vicinity of the I-25 Mixed use Development Area (commonly referred to as Del Camino, and more 'specifically in the area of. Interstate 25 and Colorado 119) or in any unincorporated area of Southwest Weld County. We petition our Commissions to reject any and all proposals that would provide for the construction of a correctional facility designed to house convicted felons remanded to the custody of the Colorado State Department of Corrections. 1. 2. 3. �4. 5. 6. 7. 8,. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. i Name (Signature) Mailing Address City ZIP i t l0e a,y 5'P /4 P 659 9 � D get./ L Se Z_ nary &C/1/A ct X /e�,e,,✓ CBs 5z CVC4, a'` 4,1e1,/Mn eiledfehimin-L.- C�7 i%G-117.T- P n, Ent x.611 0ltcjWG/4.S fienrsir .:.,y 0' ,, Vo floc 20 8`e4 oe ^,/r 4:7„1-.05/ c'Q53c q Th4 EA/4 ro5/� 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 We, t::e _.....c "., r...:ic,: o .... wol•' Coc::ty, Hereby make known to t'.e aa=i;_+ Cor..m+ o: :+'e..a �. � wz,4 zocatf• P13.^.a:.-^.g -ss_c �^._ JaaC l.�T.P Gr. - oi- OL.D6$ t_o.^ ,.oche proposed C0.^.Str=t:o' nf 3 CJ te:t_o '1 r• '-cm-- cenera_ �_ ...�. .-, ' _cs4-1' .=:. 3 �., > 'C..4m nc: o S al:': in =1e area O f -_' ^t@rs;a e s. CO_..raco. i 19) .. sr. unInenrporaced area 4° petit.: .. . . ,.:my > a:1 pr.posals that woll: prnvfi ,r I • .. _. i1: 1 C• tf dC':i Cil l'.:. to ... r �n SCE t.. .e; rera,Jel i.ttotiy of F• 1:. 18. 19. Name (Lcratre) 1' City 7�� DPLES PETITION TO THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PLANNING COMMISSION & COUNTY COMMISSIONERS We, the undersigned, residents of Southwest Weld County, hereby make known to the People of Weld County, CO, the Weld County Planning Commission and County Commissioners, cf our opposition to the proposed construction of a correctional facility to be located in the general'vicinity of the I-25 Mixed Use Development Area (commonly referred to as Del Camino, and more specifically in the area of • Interstate 25 and Colorado 119) or in any unincorporated area of Southwest Weld County. We petition our Commissions to reject any and all proposals that would provide for the construction of a correctional facility designed to house convicted felons remanded to the custody of the Colorado State Department of Corrections. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. , 10. 1 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. Name (Signature) Mailing Address City ZIP aag l won.. /0 Z CA trck sa 9to St+ 4 20. r, lm 931249 I . a_ WE_- ...'_?, co o A. o ? :: • mm:SSZO: :C _..:�?:_ .� .00 ._o �: COUNT': t M""ISSiCNE3S Iwe, the undersigned, residents of Southwest Weld known to the -People e of^weld:County CO, the We_d County.P:anning�ake Commission and County Commissioners, of our Opposition to :he proposed construction of a correctional facility co be located in tn.a general v_c_::i y of the i-25 Mixed :;se Development Area (ccr—only 'referred to as gel Camino, and more specifically in the area of interstate 25 and Colorado 119) or in any unincorporated area of Southwest Weld County, IWe pe.icion our Commissions to re;ec= any and all proposals thatwouldprovide for theconstruction of a correctional facility designed to ,house convicted felons remanded to the custody of the Colorado State ICepartment of Co--Ar-4ons. I1. 12 Name (Signature) Mailing Address l' )7Ayo i4 2 S _ ,,v,- WeR. 3 3 . 'R.U� S�fiw.,ucl 7Pfo ,2r P S' .5. C. 12. I:: 6'. r• 18. I. I. I City ZIP rent 10So9 Lo ,rte ton AVM E. -/, tell( i 11249. r•-"ILES ':.='I::' CO d.T. .,E::ti CrF_....e .OL r_,Lz' & CGCNM C.M1:G E T CIO�t RS We, the unotrsigned, residents of Southwest Weld County, hereby make known to the People of Weld County, CO, the Weld County Planning Commission, and County Commissioners, of cur cgocsition t: the :proposed construction of a Correctiono' facility to be located in the general vicinity of the 1-25 Mixed Use Cevelopnent.Area (commonly referred to as Del Camino, and more specifically in the area of , 'Interstate 25 and Colorado 119) or in any un_ncorporr,ted area of Southwest Weld County. We petit.icn our Commissions to reject any and all proposals that would provide for the construction of a correctional facility designed to house convicted felons remanded to the custody of the Colorado State Department of Corrections. Name (Signature) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. Mailing Address ,,City2IP f - Ue.r 4s ae., Siegi le je OJof., 1 i a 1 1 1 iDkatieta912491 r:OPLES PETITION TO THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PLANNING COMMISSION & COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 'We, the undersigned, residents of Southwest 'Weld County, hereby make known to the People of Weld County, CO, the weld County Planning Commission and County Commissioners, of our opposition to the proposed 'construction of a correctional facility to be located in the general vicinity of the I -2S Mixed Use Development Area (commonly referred to as Del Camino, and more specifically in the area of• Interstate 25 and Colorado 119) or in any unincorporated area_ Southwest Weld County. We petition our Commissions to reject any and all proposals that would 'provide for the construction of a correctional facility designed to house convicted felons remanded to the custody of the Colorado State Department of Corrections. e I1. 2. 13. 4. 5. 16. 7. 18- 9. '10. ,1l . 12. ;413. F. -Name (Signature) Mailing Address. 3 u/ R 4s/e.x. 7"W L✓r Za City ZIP 3cn 9 t) Gr.fra# q /2(53 /At. ? g.97 9 ptic ie 1-v% 316 6 r t k_ liadee :41 Qcr ///Act 32sLLJ('jl.f/'. s er paste er r = 1,cks r,e ,y ge.o,t i Ws J?r r ay, a SSC5/S! /,,.,rj 7osd4/ ,yo c/o r S 41249 — -.:) COUNTY, COLORADO 2:ANN:N(; COMM _ss -Lv L COUNTY COMN.,SSION2RS known the undersigned, residents of Southwest welt County, hereby make to the'People of Weld County, CC, the Weld County ?lanning Commission and County Commissioner-constr_ction of a correctional Commissioners, our opposition to the proposed 'c'- faci_„ty to be located - the general vicinity of ne I-2= Mixed Use Development Area (commonly referred to as Del Camino, and more specifically i f Interstate 25 and Colorado _ specifically the area c_ :19) or in any unincorporated area o Southwest Weld County. We petition our Commissions to re;.ect any and a_I proposals that would provide for the construction of a correctional facility designed to house convicted felons remanded to the custody of the Colorado -State Department of Corrections. - _ Name (Signat•;re) Mailing Address City zee I O?LZS : STITION TC TF;:, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO 2xA ;INC COMMISSION & COUNTY COMMISSZCNZRS Ie, the u.^.dersigned, residents of Southwest Weld County, hereby make ::own to the People of Weld County, CO, the Weld County Planning ommission and County Commissioners, of our opposition to the proposed C°fl of a correctional facility to be located in the vicinity of the 1-25 Mixed Use Development Area (comonly to as Del Camino, and more specifically in the area of Interstate 25 and Colorado 119) or in any unincorporated area of, outhwest Weld County. f. • We petition- our Commissions to reject any and all proposals that would rovide for the construction. of a correctional facility designed to Ouse convicted felons remanded to the custody of the Colorado State epartment of Corrections. I; I. I6. Name (Signature) Mailing Address City ZIP .4-' .egjt r I0?/37 desk criza, C0• c Mi •9 ,w3 5 C 41/ aro _ oe dtr,7"-Cp.Ss a 02727 V741/ r Yam G.....„ d G.., Il eprai _ �/ Gc �• d� 1�0S a//yy-n1b r�--,+�pul . MO Qt.(' 242 '0'Ow f:7:�_...� So .3 /� Ilk-) '7N t /C.,l...✓ /! 3 � %ji,�;2` � � oOSo f. 1045 ARAM' r' uia.t'sesa1 y� }�x' _,D �o'�Z Q?ATV SC- `�'Q-t 'n.01). ) Cj in WI Pm1P Sit Lynam len ( r'/'�70, 3�1t �aCe*0 are•s/ i / bc3471 .'/`-.Pi¢TT - r .®Do/ at-, C0n 74cOh / , S -1-S-1-1 el /,t cony ( on r`n t ia cr a<4( t ?.L3rtd u& . Ls -)r c t At 1 Zara 1/:-/Jay,.1 1249 We, _.e::'.••-..,4..._ _ec Cent,; ... � ni �c0�. � O� W of . 'Jt>o Weld County, kn:vd � weld County, CD, _ y, hereby mare .nomml ` zian and Count'-' Comrn_sO_On? of -:JB c�.J Cy O the1 r a correct e locate: in the . ..o on to the proposed consc . correctional; ity r ``_ _ ..1 ^''_ a .no• an= m •_' :�J 1y ,- .h e area on:y :.. rst C.J'a (_. Ca_Or:a,^_a 11 9) O .1� ! Loma, of � :rr b 1. Gr o -.. _ n s c: r 3. f all on a ...,osa s that col De_arr. rti_ e: a -e4 - , lee_gneat o -:e - _ons "'� �_ .ffor�, State ::c^.. lC P) AcOrso City Z_? Name (.c. na:cre) 1 1 I 1 1 We, che nc: :esic _ .v We t0 t:`@ People of W�_ " cfl'dCgt Weld �-,�u._ know ss - .- t -Y, tannin make _or, an„ ..oar,: CJmr:_sn ur opood Coaat7 Planning co.n.stractio.n, of a correctional . ._", of our OJpo atLOr. to :he proposed general . n._ _.,n r Mc? located the p sed -e a aJ .•.� : ^?-' en1.• ♦ ..-oilmen- r.,_•`r r c^.• ''+tbe (co--onlyo. state .� r Colorado ,7a_-3 in to area J. JC::C.'?:1p•t Weld L..:un t:.We -_.. '- ... any -ainoor.^.Jr�_�G' area pt ?t1:_ n o.:r C3:n : lions p:CV1Ce for the C7nctruC-1o.n.- - -aI r ] .: all .lty:. •3:S:that ned to L'lr_',. house convicted felons ema __ - •J_. Ff .. Colorado �^. Department of =J -'F•• Jns. t')CI O -010;16 ` .v r, 4. I9. .:v.-_. Acntell `1 50>1 f11 o5 -0q I I PtS 1249 known We, e0 - - :v - YS!:'.: Peop: o: w `c CoWeloncy, hereby nmake Planing Comm�J: C:C.:�Jrss:o �?:: c a Or-t_C .,.._. o of oz.:_J.. to The proposed 'onst`--rc;tr .. �i'^ l:/c.tet _i• `ne fez . as �� .�Z .o:;r:.a ;:ea (co --only ^ce e anctC "aRJ 11 &' in ce area o: Sou„ . e -NI_ ..U.'1 .. '{ r .: .V`CA(1 area gO- ipeZition provine •, Comm. ...>. >n:♦ COo tI. he house o.vL ..n telons Ziftspa-tme7- r= 4 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. al. co:ia_s chat wn ld ... �.,.�..�. _cio ado Sr_S e4 ... 1 1 i :OPLEE P ICON Tv THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PLANNING COMMISSION & COUNTY COMMISSIONERS de, the undersigned, residents of Southwest Weld County, hereby make known to the People of Weld County, CO, the Weld County Planning Commission and County Commissioners, of our opposition to the proposed ',construction of a correctional facility to be located in the general vicinity of the I-25 Mixed Use Development Area (commonly referred to as Del Camino, and more specifically in the area of. Interstate 25 and Colorado 119) or in any unincorporated area of 'Southwest Weld County. We petition our Commissionsto-reject any and all proposals that would 'hprovide for the construction of a correctional facility designed to ouse convicted felons remanded to the custody of the Colorado :State Department of Corrections. 1 Name (Signature) Ii.. 634 e- 13. Mailing Address City ZIP soar we.9. as 57/Y.,,,..a Go .2:Q } 429, lr Ate4 g //Thyu'..(/iei Pr/ a -a— 4 - "vr/,e . nt91flC,. Mra mar*y - �4 15. �lv�a.. ; r,ucaam, I6. Ja,,TAa J; 1,�1n P - 7. t.. 18- 1 9. 5?0l Cc. I Sgt wL-e 2.z s�llf� GUP,g Zz dA a naz ccvck azeter cox.? C8.94 (,)e t 4a. 'a— AD - 3377r b9, if, -9,2 (6 C /3 la 4110 op t o s— iO°1t&T1' 09Id 'T.ei i*-.z_Br'c 411.5 fCR/s lye L P°7"04 Poi -oaf X44 �JU�lL ?ong 8os-O goso5 t` go go c/ ftco o for -r,/ 3PLES PE ION TO THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PLANNING COMMISSION & COUNTY COMMISSIONERS We, the undersigned, residents of Southwest Weld County, hereby make known to the People of Weld County, CO, the Weld County Planning Commission and County Commissioners, of our opposition 'to the proposed construction of a correctional facility to be located in the general vicinity of the 1-25 Mixed Use Development Area (commonly referred to as. Del Camino, and more specifically in the area of • Interstate 25 and Colorado 119) or in any unincorporated area _of Southwest Weld County. We petition our Commissions to reject any and all proposals that would provide for the construction of a correctional facility designed to. house convicted felons remanded to the custody of the Colorado State- Department of Corrections. Name (Signature) 1. 2. T celj .. 3. 1*tieetristrtitso 4. 5. 9. 14. 15. 16. �FFH A? Ili / 17. al 6yS� (iii! w. re /3 18. / " 4 a �n 7o IV GG_l'lP/3 19. 11 /f/, /0/ 4/ 20. Tj,.P/r-get-9-7// 4v.e. >1a iz Mailing Address City ZIP 7,J wC �y 7710 Gvcft 5 'Lev v s r_I21c, It"o (<71.71177.4-, u-, I -sic LOatat v,Af IUS-vC( L oW6n{e !.OS".0 sore 7r 10477,14 Sen'V earn. - $oczu/ 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 y-931241 .3 ... s<:.:, ....:. 'ULJCv,DO 2"— COMM:S- ,. .V`. t'y .: CC i..MMI ..Ss r0`G15 1 i i we, s the undersigned, =e:de.^ts S^west Weld County, heret make eld County, known to the•Peoo:e of Wt� Y .... _. e weGounty� Planni^q Commission and County Commisz:cnero, .f our opposition tothe proposed construction of a tor-ec-`ona' in ' -y to be locatedr he genera_ vicinity of ::e 1-25 Mixed se Development Area(commonly referred to as De' Camino, and more specifically in the area Cf Interstate 25 and Colorado 119) or in any unincorporated area. 95 Southwest Weld Conty. Iwe petition our C---:issicns to reject any and all proposals that would provide for the construction of a corm_ house convicted felons remanded to the Custody ofCthe Coloradoed State 1 Department of Corrections. 12. 3 6. �y. I:: 00. /it ame(S c::at;,;:ze> mailing Address 0icieboA 1,2 0/7 3PEioc ha36 City ZIP 1 ranOSai ,65ns ll yoro/ r. Fria r /3P_, ;�/�<A, 9zt c4rrno 'X"osO3 a/43 ec PL,S.$cQ lit c oitrf 1O 503 2kf3 Qr_Ys kc (4 . 1(.rosyc.w Fria I 931249.. LvUN':'l, CJ:.0?.ADO 9LANU_:rO 1. •n•.;. •.• COUNTY S •i•.. .:�.,� ::d S v�iN f CDId!".i$$ION � we, the undersigned, residents of Southwest Weld County, hereby make known to the People of weld County, CO, the Weld County Planning Commission and County Commissioners, of our opposition to the proposed construction of a cor-ect,cnal `a_: '_y to be located in the • general vicinity of the '_-25 Mixed use Development Area (commonly referred to as Del Camino, and more specifically in the area of Interstate 25 and Co_orado`119) or in any unincorporated a_ea,of Southwest Weld County. we petition our Commissions to reject any and all proposals that would provide for the construction of a correctional facility designed to house convicted felons remanded to the custody of the Colorado State Department of Corrections. 1. 1,....L. �� - 1. h 3 t �ri M..4.01 c28,1 44-•11 et 44 3. e 4 ars -Dle' M -:e -4a.4 10 9/4 r/4 ,M, SAOa q5 F 4. gar/ P Sat I RD- 4a -K /S2 f('&der;Cr\ 5. 4;"yatov ed 5. ,t44,7-2-70 /(27.7.7e.4._ 7. 8. 0 10. 18. 19. Bic( ,&/u4r, ,O -{P PP; Name (Signature) mailing Address City ZIP 8osa1 9o5o9 has?� h'pr 92,12 1 1 1 1 1 Cu .OR;DO ?..A:!:;_C.; CoY.m:SO: . c COUNT'S MJMM _SS.ONyRS we, the undersii.;ned residents of Southwest Weld County, hereby make known to the -People of Weld Count:•, CO, the Weld County Planning Comn_ssion and County Commissioner;, of our opposition to the proposed construction of a c---P--'one' facility t0 be located in the general vicinity pf the 1-25 >i:.ec Use Development Area (commonly referredto as Del Camino and more specifically in the area of Interstate 25 and Colorado 1191 or in any unincorporated area pf Southwest Weld County. We petition our Commissions to reject any and all proposals that would provide for the construction of a correctional facility designed to house convicted felons remanded to the custody of the Colorado State Department of Corrections. 1. 1 4. 5. 16. 8. 19. 11 7. 18. •10 Name (Signature) Mailing Address City ZIP 49 . ... ::C ,..;� j; : , N : - : _ RS known t:... �C oX Weld-County,CO the Weld .oun, 1, hereby make ..cUnty Commis:: oneoe, Coto�y. ?_the pr d.in the �onst.,_ - .. correctional :q ., be 1 r opposition to the proposed C� . ✓ _ a -R.; -a.... . - 1i Ara (rea oc3_! rsz,.-? _n. Co,crad. .,y)ih n a,,o in :he are•b y rporated f "..:e peSiticn our C;u1TionN r:,:::. any.a!: all prsposals that -would :,.earl^ _ c•• :.x1y of •= - •� � Corrections. •. Co. -]red: Sza^� .``ame (2_. :a=_«e) _ Address City 7.=P • 1 1 13. I 1:: I8. • C : , . • a-: _ C:;;:::cy, hereby make :i(-.. ...i:...�y �p`�.-...... j .r .r :G... the. -1r nn V� ,q(4, � Lri c,? BIZ 1,4O/t4-)- ..O^rc3,t4 rst e r,. rhar-a �r4,' .- ?'Kc ,?D 5c/ '09 00 i oA c& btyolsr/QN „chi Rio c'I 91249 Tt, %srLAAAO G�--•--te' �r,..�� -� / L•' i; X t > % 1GC i Anti ) TIC., (icK Q ^ eCSteNtE CI.., ez-x G•, C , re/N.• g-C'S3O S'aszd asss iccui)\). (\(‘ , _ 7c7c 7-2f / 9e i/ D (Ivy V5932:25 Eco4 4trP sr 6 Fee hkg.td., S'°.3 I IArc &osa O I gar 4 ; 70S4 F,e.F eel) 26 4-74, '9e 1 J 1 1 1 1 1 9212491 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 _..s_ - :. -c . : a y of ?r• to as `..c_ r sr: :co ionA and -or;aG 3 'COUNT:: cc M:ss:cN .J .i.;.__ntis_ We__ County, .. . ... C:, :he Weld County ''o --:-- --e-7, of ot.: t tCJjt:on .•'y17::r n_f to be located in the :• .A l Use te:'elcp ent area(oc=only ..._re specifically in the area ot in any unincorporated area of e -- ___:.. _ r ---_t any and all propcsa:_ -hat _• .c_ t a .___n;:t__n correctional facility olecione to o -.: - - _ .... -- ca . ., e: to the custody of the co' , -s, . Cepiar_. en: o: Xailing Address r 1 .:; • . • / • ...• 4er - f }rte ., rt. Y E. / �. _ ... r •• •;,:„6 `�2-�' ._. :.,7T‘.. tj.-' ,„ eeL� �!fcck 1 (: , - ,' i t e:' ,c.C•• r •\T. L ` 1---1 (�'.. _'-•) p f•-r '/ .,y,. - r:. ---!-- �' .. ' e '✓ r� y ' A •.a.................. {�y -'j` :, OC ... / / I,• /o; 4%, cwhA7fox ; ` ' . l ' .;. '%'7 �->? • J(4.lGl�`%'Q .t ;�') /nevi/! ryy JJ /' i' tY� l �6-4 1,/JlC J L- ff 11 r•1, i �XY�r/!�/•} �//'l �, �' C`, • / ,.% � I/ _,,^�t��l��h:1.,{`S f �C:Pr 1.aQ1�� • I '11;1347•r r•(.; '.- ' : 7/6 /go t C^/ 1- -?/ % did." i r r rri i� it r:/1v1i1./if C:1<,',,/ (7 /'r /,A ? �/ -L 6iL LSC.r--. y,r� i� r / j s\ ! �r C '/C' %! �� l 1 / 1 1/- ,4 G t* / i r 7 ill -J..) it i-y i/ /,..7.7 ---17{k Z1249 • .,0 COUNTY, C^2„_,00 1G. is c an C rif �:.:. •J_ .a.e v_5Jar. Scu:z'.:es: Xe1S C CCU:,"."i :,w,.t i -- our Co_ _ '-1 :o ., opposition :.cc≥: _:: of ._, ,.-_ Use _'ever -,a.._ Area.. .+ _. _ f. r. r' C: �n 'J _.. he •(^ _ 'i or - any unincorporated - - __ Soct,^,uezt :.., _, :.^ _ .. 1 CO, re , a County _. Co'--..,__.,.- t.� reject any a:: a: rrr.,,,s2 is ?:ovC- :he CCr3_._•,.: .-' cf a correrti'tna1 facility o cc-,v;cte::, :e -J, _o -y :eppur_-a-z of Corrections. Address C: • 1.•i i "\-.44.,,L...‘„ _ X, a„ , / G • /-,•%u.+r rte..+. 8aX 9'v IF.-�i1, �-�af 1] Pec 3 . > 5 i..�N _ ... s ,/ (yam 6. - ;n s/„-, , .%t,./•''''::::...C] /it, G 7. '-' ,,,/ , : ,/ ' J : =, , b"� S-�'L______,4..._____...„._..„..___. 8. c n •1� iK. G.L • / /) / e 7 y�� /n i /�� ' 9. ::,-c,f744 -c> ..f . C° , s �� ,t Cam, i2. i ok /6$ J 14. 1.477:4, 15.i 16.1 19. 20. ve,c/6srei.+.. ,. I 1 1 1 PE:_7_C`7 . ...� ........ COUN ?, LoLCRADO COUN COb_^.'!:SSi^?;E3:' ,...,c2= - .. .'�°:..::)•.., C - r^. ...ne _ weir' Cou.'. tie C- _ ne ?eo;.ie cf .,J'.::.: v, moo. the ne_d �.:'-"'--..:....-7 .....nsa_:.. and Cc--_._. C: .._M1. ion :s, of our o ;o^.a:n : ._ :' .:e ' .. - --'o n of a C___.t• ^.:n. : :' _tto Loe located in ��'.(• 'J�.. o: :-25 U.. _. U e•✓evelcprent Arc (c:,.....Q:. '1 to as a::G r..r:e specificrai iy, in the area cf :••tar+t&te 2i c.=.i: .".o..oraco 1::'I or in any unincorporated area o'. Scu::.west We:County. We petition ourC....,._...,_c.ers to reject• any and all•prtpocais•t..-.. would provide for the cons:ruc:ion o: a correctional facility C?ecr to Ouse convicted fe-oas rern ended to the custody of the Col.ro:__• State Depart:tent of Corrections. :are, (Sic.:a_ure) `` . L •tvvi.<t:aa /.ice " II L.r•` • 9. 7' . 7.,•,..s•'' ' /7//:044":_t , .C _t i -2k c yvn'LIZ1/4 1 1 1 Mailing Address City ZtE /G`/3z C()Gkd7 /yi p)v- s_' ic>e 07/ / z; ivcZ /3 r /,µ4g41' C', Tfek 72, 7''az IC'' /L' 771.r -et /Met Y I £R.t; .tt< fre •%c 4';'71 / �_-, ---- 20. ' irn �i n U + '-I-•.r oN _, _..r Z_jNay, Cc;Z::•:zo _.. r:.w.Lv p ..3U:17C3U:17Y v. VM.M 3o:::wes- Weld County, C ^County _ i corn71::. .. _ of opposition t: =hr? �-_— !.� y =srNe :cared in -*a - ,o J - 25 Cel. U::e Devei pmert Are "L gel �.,,..._..:: an., -'lore ;pacifically "e _.Jf - -nin the area of ...._ -_-e � s :.: Co:cr:,c�_ 115i or any unincorporated .+ Weld County. nape area f �rlr r' r. •� .... G b.. reject any ana all proposals chat w.7.; cJfor�_a c3nst__-__:-'.of a correctional facility e _ d felons .'clancted to the dora D3part:.e.: of Cor__ccio custody of theColcradoStz,. Name nature; mailing Address City -f 3. ,1 •• •c' 6Yern t / ,• .--- .1 1c r J �'.� <-G �,• /u+' /. C)il •7•ti; Le..-:, Y'i'n. 1 :0 . +. ; / i . / ; .:.r i' i- --a..� _.w_ r / -- 13 • /• / ir . , _4 _• __ /. 14 . '77;"7-7777-17.71-1-111—.—t, /-.'_____ //4 �; .^/.A....r-.../i_. •:, �•!� / i / ^�., i4 9 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 to of .. '- ?tctntty of -m as L_l 5 ant Colorato :Cn__.. .. _. ftr cc .Vic -e Dept:neen: o' Cc 3. 4. 5. Commisttno rrectlotS ate. ;S'1_ at.11 . �n j, � f rire7.41'.:./4 ry , ,51C' c71.!%e L6. -fr (� • " - .3c'._..:'n'.a: - Re - OtctIlty c _ to be located in tne Cso = jvelorr..enc Area „norespe.n:ica'e .a:. _f _- any uaiccor_orateca_ee, _. O e • ' r that o- aJ correctional cllity -ed ,. he custody of the Colorado _.... Xaiiing Address :i ..—i ' 8. /'. . 4/ /!~- n • ,'"--/-- _ /? r GC 1vcikfF; 4 . . / P'a'=d. / frvf e#7 1-. . r4 /512/C C - / tti / r4 " /l 4 t444(- , I 1. 14.. i, l .1 I� � ,.�� /,� t///'/ICJ 1Gu . .L • 17. 18. J I-, 19. In P" -A. 7✓> 1 23. �.-,-.7745„77--7 v � w.ri '7t/ .f • L4 /7/G O'17 C ,� "" c..�..)r'n14. ,, r/. /e» - '.bt J Fins- , i o-7 QC< -6:,, 249 CC.t pADo ... ... _..__.. -... , 2.,, _..e e d `, _ "flpposizi5. . ::G_ weg- iiejc CCUC[y. }' d- uninC0:p,^r:::C'd • '?CC? � -'•:, . -e.:: any arc _.:. _.. 5 d:; : _y d 2 -, > hC_S2 ^-.'JLC'?^ felons •- .a yCJ__2C�1C^d. � .. Depa=t:tent C: CC_=et_:,. ,_ :o .. e Custoc'7 of the 20._ 9^. 4. •"='�" 1ii 1R:..?, ?7L.ilnr Address • =G `• J } ......--.....;--.4.:—.1:... .....-- L � I. :? 6. :, y --ter `---,I 'r , ,...-z c. �, / I / .7,,_ 10 . i .C7 Ii 3 . Ar P.. s@'' /2 is — I/ '4^5;'n..4 1-4ty' 4 ry. Y$ - 1 49 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 II1 1 1 I I I I 1 I I 1 1 _ .ilex_ Web _:.:n . l V ✓ (7.7,:...:2.. .• I _ Cur ^ _ » oppo cr - v ^ -Zrj f:yC lc {e '1 eve1of en �n: : am / C o r. s ✓e .,, u -/ d ] nor? specifically ._.i „_._e 25 ant: Coi - :.R ated _r,._ . icu :o^ Weld ,e1---y.ri'::) ..7) Cr 1�^. u^j/w+:il.i::C »c=^»d`.@'� �Y•i. __ we e::.'.. on 0_: .: o::7.i3:.L ;^a V: .. :'$ . - _:a^- any and all ^iC7^^.i.s t,.% ;eVn'o: zh .J•'_ c:Li -_•• - '-:_ :he custody of the Col__ac� . Department o: Cc_rec Xa:r.e :c,.C Xailing Address �•_/ =� 2. I rfc--/,�,.' re % ,- , I 7. •w. • I r...47 • fi S. brit C 15.! 17. 18. 15.' 20 -sal 49 C7 . / coLoRAD0 -r..... =,/k X:SS:CW 4 CCi;S.Y C MM:2 :CNN-.., v �._..S. cc�J e County ..- C; ;e Xele County-Larninr CJ^r__'' '?.a. o_ a C- -.._. _. _ ._'S/ . C .. ..`:, 7 _ �_.._.._ of _y _o. o POC_7i_ he:coated in :he toos -:, _ .:re .specrise ''' -ally i7ent Area `h(coarof "'-2 25 a .: CJ_... a'ao _y e 6 re of Sou west We C County. �ClVa.^.y 0�^0=7�@d 7_�i r xe our Co.;.-a^,a r_o_rejec' prow:te for L.he Con ion - •Co correctional o.. a e_L:y des r.nn• house co.^.victe'a felon _ e a `Custody ofC:h Cy C�_•'_ y -ama;ui_� �o :be custody of the Colorado rt Department of COrrec�_c�s.- Na—to (S - 1. 7. \72 • /1 --w ~mil ,- • V U:!I ' /-7 ,;I mil;; , n ,.., c, 7 2. // / ez q i Yaii_ng Address ; - �Lrr r•.v 2- } J -7P-C7 Fece. L 241,o64C/ 14. � •=kJY/[„�.d.:Zn.47.4 l!/_; if it^ , :s. :,La_ u, 1' 6 ''� L/ So ,;1 -_, / / G 17 i t'',//,4 q`k • _• 1 d . `%.,amp //_ I !i 13 ` ,_ ,,..4,7 ' / &-. 7 1 �- , ?.721^2 -.._ 0JG;y22, c�• e osL rV mu IL / 1 1 1 ;;•;; ;TITION lr.. :,4.,: COON Y, COLORADO 1 1 I PLANNING CO:-:1lS 'Ic &' COUNTY COMMISSIONERS , one unaeraig.'.ed, re:: icients Of_,Southwest Weld County, ;.o ch3 People of y:l:_d County, CO; the Weld County Planning Cot.i.:,ion-and County Commissioners, of our opposition to the l:,; <-nnntr,:ctian of a corn::•r.ionai facility to be located in the c;t . vicinity of dc Z-25 1ixad Use Development Area (cornmo i of •a•i `_o as Del Cana-, and mcce specifically in the area of int_:.:.ce 25 ana Coio.:u.:o ]i5) or in any unincorporated oou....resz Weld County.area of k��= • .... __O ; y„r Commis:; prov:ta for :.a Construe rvi,^ced felon:; Depsrtm of Corr.�ct:c•: N. c (Signature) -Mailing Address ,�, t'r .. 7, r.vt2� 5\ ,c 1 ^ 1for � .1 / i � ii (Jr 7. 1 8. /' :r.._.,-..,..,�4 i T. •ter: 1_ ! (i. < J- r /.'' / . ! ,••••;•/2.? ' //•,• 12. rl LL . 2., z. f . 1 . • 71:1104,./ ./G 15. 1 T1�•• ijairt f SicT.li1,.)�,, 16. l �isytze. r �7 I 20 ( ',7,!/c e) I • , co reject 'any and all proposals LthtL w'.,, moo- of r. correctional facility designed t,, r.'-radncic•d to the 'Custody of the Colorado Cil:y / ;QY(OT4-• 4L • -1 f___ ,('93).249 2y:'I,'SS PETITION WELD COUNTY, COLORADO C LAN.SIN'a (,(/�u^_.JJLOY 6. COUNTY COMMISSIONERS o:. Southwest Weld _o tie People Sc ,, : ; County, ytannin r p:. _.'.. .._on ,.:nd Count:, Co:;.. •1, CO,COthe Weld County Planning c, el ,t _ o -11, ,o. our opposition to the proposed ac...o:,a facility to be located Frc or 1-25 aired Use Development in the zo =s :el Camino, and more specifically Area the (commonly r.t_rstate 25 and Colorado 119) p o in tarea oof "ou 2:west Weld County. or in any unincorporated area or :''ttion o -.r, Con:a;.ssins to reject any and all proposals that would :'t -o: ioe for the construccicn •')u• convicted felons remanded a correctional custody facility designed to Dep'=r a.e:,t of CorrectionnsT�rded to the custody of the Colorado Star.. Mailing Address "• .M i i Judo / % { , e.....j .,,` _ • ......"..._...._,..://.7 { '\/'. / pi[. .G - %„ �' ';% :2.. /i7 I- ,r 9.1 -C,«.,. • iefl II: ( ti 7 t ;)/(1 ( E �/ 'rte 18.! 19 ' ./ 20 '••( /. /! �' I , w "7^ City 'I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 LJ 'f.:ZTTOtJ TO -ME 'JELD COUNTY, COLORADO PLANNING COMMISSION &_COUNT'! COM.MISSrONERC We,410. tae undersigned, knwto the People :es: dents f Southwest Weld County, her,.h• Commissionr of weld and mil. CO, the Weld � ..� __ _ _County Co-mi_-cioner opposition o1/_r;r' i):: -.n of coreoc._o:.a:. facility to r eploctdn to r'.. 1,.,./ `;v.C � Y be located t. , . d Use Devi i.r. the .tY of ..�: :- � ••;•._• .o Oc-1 C.,:::.r. Development Area te (c /m tilt.::. awe 25 zinc: COQ>_a`o :.tUl more specifically in `�• Y the area „ f :9) or ar, .. :>cu_:.r..st 5Je_e County, in any unincorporated tti:r, ?�:�i.to:, our Ccmmi:,sion;: • pro)e:co reject any and all proposals for the construction; of a correctional A tysdes the., house canv.cted felons rem;.nded to the custody —::1 De art , facility de;;i/trr,,+ P :r.er.t of Correctit;;, Y of the Colorado Mme iSignat ur'e Mailing Address 1 _ City . r I 3 7„,„ / n 1,4i 11 4 I l./ /re i .. r-- i' '� tit .l�'r,, e i ' te- "1/c �;<<, Njolihiw7/7 ��e 1-a,. _.:,...._y__‘...,44‘.._______--__-1-.,.:...:-- 1( 1 i C> ', a r, u-4t� 1/ J 2'.. i 1 ✓r c J' C ! '.1 t+ 4'/.,,., 93,249 City •ii/; i'7,4) COUNTY, COLORAL LAN;; �`„•I "" ,.� b COUNTY COMMISSIONERS of Southwest Weld County, hey-,,. • 1 odnty, CO, the We ld 'in thfl adf oti :; :.. ,r,s:o Jrn, of our opposition) to 1 t^'._. •'.. ,. vicinitynof. , _c,r facility.to be located • L ro`Del 2 >,...5 more specifically Development Area n( o::•)_:.: 'e as5 and Color o 1:4) or inpan unin ly in the a-„` :flLr Wc. 1 , , <,� Co r.3;:. y unincorporated area Our Corr "fr < ors in ; re:�+- ecr any and all facility r a :Drrection', Arity de:, t_ the custody of the .. •) :^-._. _.7; Address �,aa 1 , / • D 34-4 4. _,_,L;: -„may ] - 9 "nlG32l�� a tercar LfL1. 15. r.•V 9 1 1. 1 1 1 1 1 7,1 . " i r- �� '" E• ►�' l'r, q . Rid I I I 1 1 ":-:DcNLOS' PETITION iv,ME WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PLANN;Ni;.COmmISSION & COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Wecap undersicnecl, .eei.:,, nt s of Southwest 6i..'•.;•i 'zo the People .o: ode l.i County, CO, the Weld Countyy, lanni n m:�i,l• Cx:..:s.;.on and County Co.:.r.:_.:s o:,crs, of our o olthei.nt ca:;c_-.ct;on of a Cc_racti,inal facility to,beplocatedninothe^ prat , 5� .•.. vsC..ity of t.;,_ is -2; Mixed Use Development Area (commonly ref,:::,:o to as .gel C..,r.i.lo, and more specificall i :ntu::.rate 25 and Co:.oraao Y orate a . of 119) or in areany unincorporated area of SaL'L.:dcSt Weld County. We ,ot_t:on our Commission ; to reject any and all rposals prov ce :"or the construc,ac.:. of a correctional facility desi.y„ed w01(1 hoL:t;e convicted felons rerscnaed to the custody of the Co) orado flt Dep rcment or Corrections. Name (Signature) mailing Address 1. ice.; I 5. t `• .\... _ 'r...�_' _,:tl,•..>_ (:='..74:::t •` Qk.. C_ / I' ,-# (/ • -----._.__4.Z.. �,k �. l ' t C 11I -I. . 8. �� y , I r 10 +!�av �ry ,� d I 12 �.� /' \�2 ',.., all '(" • Ciro S 4 13 ii",././.4.-9`,4„‘1 �oq�/ I 15 i' t 1. )2 f'4 1 �` / Q n / I /n 2/C'i 7 1 ivic { L 1V i iZ15..2i ';- 118.I 1 1 14.1 St -Q.8 ,t rCVi--_-__t c /ie City n% i l/i7 t 1 :!, \1-•c 10941 2.4 City ..ir "'G ' Ede Wl;w COUNTY, COLORADO PLANNING COMMISSION & COUNTY COMMISSIONERS we, .:he unOorigned, re••`dentc o Southwest Weld County, hereby v:'otJn co the People :.t N'+ ::..rzszo nd County pleo Commissioners, County, CO, the Weld County i Mn::•• -:.,r;truc::,icn of a rs, of our opposition to correctional facility to be located inothee P-ol...o 'ral vicinity of the I-25 Mixed Use Development Area r ed to as uel'Camino, and more s 25 and Colorado 119 Pecificalln (commonly the area f ol. rest Weld County. ) or in any unincorporated area �of '•: :_:•.� o -,.e Co ?.: .‘: fOr .n. construction of no --a'' convicted i- ionsne..`_- Corrections. remanded �'".ieno of Corrections. r`"e (signature) . ''`...1e, -,:.:-In". S {_, l c2 r t d ect and ajcorrectional�facll ilitosdes that d would to- the custody of the facility o Starr Mailing Address I i 1 I I I I i I ?ti. L•I$'? mr.IO:J TO PH?: IV ij COUNTY, COLORADO PLANNING CJMM:SS:ON & COUNTY COMMISSIONERS we, toe undersigned, residents f. Southwest Weld. County, her,'t y Il known to the People o; '≥L4d County; CO, the Weld Commission and County Commissioners, of ouropposition s County oltheip con trcnon of a corr(ctional facility located e!?otdn to e pm, L�enera, vicinity of t; (, :-25 / Dse en to nt in rea the referral to as Del Camin, and moreUspecificallyninAthe area of f Interstate 25 and Coiora;.o 119; or in any unincorporated area oi Soutuwest Weld County. We penti;.n our Commissions to reject any and all provide for the construction of a correctional facilittyVdesigned 1, als that i house convicted felons remanded to the custody of the Colorado e2 „• Department of Corrections. Name (Signature) 1. 3. 1 '', // Mailing Address City 26e c..,e 73', 5C.. n., . nlhr -'1-12-27 7 L,r C' t/.3 8. r- '✓.7 /• 1 `:-�•iOS%j 7e'e" n /.� 0 • G%.'`,,,_,' lo. 19.E .4e J• .•.11 ( /��•,, Ct,1i�G\ r' Y•• /. e'Re TL!••s -- _1... .-. g its,.. 'Eo?LES PETITION WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PLANNING C.)>S24ISSION & COUNTY COMMISSIONERS and igne =''r �, ntsCounty, Weld County, hereby ma - :rho eo}>i o :.on ,rr ,�u - ss CO, the Weld County Planning y " -o rs,'of our opposition to the prop2if d _ofl of a cortcina, th ;:ility to be located in the l VHc usuy,'1ofCa t .r, 'ndi more UseDevelopmentArea. (commonly terL•. to 25 and Coloraco 119) specifically in the area of Weld County. or in any unincorporated area of 'mu Ccr,missions to reject �.. .any and all proposals 1: r•ov: ce for the construction of a correctional that to ; hciu,. :o:,victee felons remanded to the ffcilitColdesigned to N.p+r sent of corrections. custody of the Colorado State, Mailing Address ' City ;s. 7. , ,9. i 1 I 1 U # `CR {I 1 I I 31,24 -c'Jd„cS eeYITION. ii'.','y-'COUN: Y, COLORADO PLANNI . ; CpM;n; SSION COUNTY COMMISSIONERS We, tnn undersigned, residents of Southwest Weld County, hereby r,,,, known to the People of Weld -County, CO, the Weld County E•iannin, Commission and County Commissioners, of our opposition to th,> p.•/4.,. . CO"t=uctioa of a correctional facility to be located in the gen,:ra_ vicinity of the I-25 ,Mixed re&rred co as Del Camino, and more e Development ifilli Area (rcalll!,f Int,Jrstae 25 and Colorado -119 e npanyfunincor poste area Jt Southwest Weld County. 1 or in any unincorporated ern;, ni We ?etit_on our Commissi.ns to provide for the constructior•'of house convicted felons remanded Department of Corrections. Name (Signature) /! r </ -2 reject any and all proposals that wn+.:.1 a correctional facility designed to the custody of the Colorado (:t,. • 4. 741 -9 ,%. i.r.�/�r� r I r., :. v 9� / r I10. . r'7 C �1 (Ft , T� '/ •G i11. ' 1 3. ' ''/(1` 14. 1 l Mailing Address City i,en,)rr;,t /L." 1 16. A-19 /I w i.I 11 ' , I //ll 1 a I.i_,.C,CLTnl� 47 nS �Y• 4-- 219Aq Par PLES PETITION Ta TnE WILD COUNTY, COLORADO PLANNING COMMISSION & COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Southwest Weld County, hereby make cnc:,: to the People r. :4,1d County,CO,the Weld Lnci Count/ CO County Planning _uctzoi. of a nt/ract�nl s oi.rs, of our opposition to the props tr v;c_,iit of the zonal -._ility to be located in. the proposed arced to as Dao Camino, 'Nixed Use Development Area (commonly !.:'erred t 25 and Dand more specifically in the area of southwest Weld County. 119) or in any unincu orated azea of oetiton our Comnissions to reject any and ail roosals that :Jrov'de for the construction of a correctional facility designed tould Department of Corrections. aou.? convicted felons remanded to the custody of the Colorado state 4. 9. • 10. 1.. lG. 15. 14. 4••a (Signature) ,ailing Address ,a. We -// 15. 18. 19. 20. ' I City 1 1 1 1 �► ;v •:f.•) COUNTY, COLORADO PLANNING ccici.csSION & COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 1 I 1 I 1 I tno undersigned, reaicenc; known to :he People or W,,ld cou Commission and County Coa,nissio construction of a correct;,c•:••a:, general vicinity or tele 1-25 Yi referred to .;s Del Canine, :,;.c interstate a.e 2:i and Colorado il5) 5':uc.:wes:: Nola County. •_ . !t_tion our Commissions to provide for the construction of house convicted felons remanded Department of Corrections. ::ar•,e (Signar.urel of Southwest Weld County, hercb• :::•,:... :qty, CO, the Weld County Planniin•, ners, of our opposition to the: c.r facility to be located in the red Use Development Area (commonly more specifically in the area of or in any unincorporated area of reject any and all proposals that Y ,:d a correctional facility desi.nnc,<i Co the custody of the Colorado C:";;, ,. Mailing Address City Wily! fC^ / • • / n • lb i C`/ /.'.-1 /,� %s ktlit i '?.ff r l,,) /11/ f t 1 J 'r'e/ ria 11 I fr !` l /SffS V t 17. 8.1 19., 20.1 •t : ZCZ".,s PLTITZON C• E W1 3 COUNTY, COLORADO i .A.NNIN.; C. ,1c$!t?bl 6 COUNTY COn•9ZS51ONEP,S fry 1•'XS-I,i � :"c'_r idents of Southwc,st r to 1 11 t eyi ) �, r.t I:C1d C. uWeld County, i nn± � Jp;. .1SS.. Jl. and C: Vn- (, o.n t.l�r CO,C(]•_h'? `'r'i..t rj county P' -,r y Commissioners, < ,: •y c.�. rnn:tructi,n oe a co:r^ctio .a;sitzon t% te :•, V:•..::71 (.Y of the I -o.; M' f6cility to be _I,^43, ^) ',� horn .._ i , ed U e Develop-.iert Area 1 ! a s ; el Carr .no, „r,4 more spec_Pic:�.l',': in ttie are;! c y 1.)t ••..a; 25 and Colorado .,l9)• or ±n ony "' c xeld County. -ln-•: •.'•?rp(:lc'_Cd a.'!*a of our Commissions to rr:ject any and ell proposals that win! '.c.:ci;, ter :r.e constru,C;p,. of a correctional Dep.,:tnen of noo., onvicted felons remanded to the custody facility y„ d05ianed. t1 Ctions.ie r..r yr,ature) mailing Address 431' zirte MUMS f-T/rr .:e..e r 9 . j___________......._. I • • taViatiti fr 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 ----921249 i:O2,.e,S PETITION TO '::iE WIELD COUNTY, COLORADO PLANNING C:iMN;S:':O;Q & COUNTY COMMISSIONERS we, tad undersigned, 3f Southwest Weld County, hereby t^.ik• kr.c a to the People o. w.; 1Q County, CO, the Weld. County Plannir,q Co:t::.:ssion and County Cc.:;niia:or:•trs, of our opposition to the prod::: •,: con ..truttion of a cor:'..C: io:.a: ;acility to be located in the qe . ral vicinity of t:..: .:-25 :di id Use Development Area (commcn ref:rceci to as Del Car..:::c, and more specifically in the area of Inz.erscate 25 and Colora;:o 119) or in any unincorporated area of Southwest weld County. we pet tiOn Our Commis.si:ns to reject any and all proposals that. .y• prov'ce for the const.-uc::ion of a correctional facility designed t., houst, convicted felons r.rmarded to the custody Of the Colorado :;'.1. Department of Correccionc. 1 2 4. 6. 9. :0. q 13. 1.4. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. Name (Signacu; ) Nailing Address City vi ,1\h 4Pf• fauI.'.9,"s !I l,'/ c (c2. .' .7O " _. i ( cop ('G . �.�/.. �,.,..:,.,, 1 �'-� l t LJ(',Q 2��jf.6ix i4cG }�„rsl S[) ,_ c..:"l /�2 �' ;• . C.-'! ic, i,?i.r,7.e,/&., �<,x ,41 frres6,— `:,L.,', 1 A•x �' C< 4,).-\.— • % ',).-\. r ,n 'l "l am �� ,.� _/.. IJ CI- =Lam„1 ycs-4I�1 cl ,�"i l 7 G -•..- •1) aMO R,, x .s r n.vn �o„ r; ...111nr /iill, '1,061 ',veto /0.-...•, , , , u(r 0 CAW( 10ly 831: acs. I ,4 chc s,y_ ,t/4,0 ,...`/),...tf' y �,�_ir ti ' r1rcP . Po a°I Dac0o 'O.i/t,,, i cA - - 1 1 1 i 1 1 I I I -•i'i:o?LES 1E' ITION 70 •3I Wi:LD COUNTY, COLORADO PLANNING C:::/,Y ;;;;'_0:� & COUNTY COMMISSIONERS We, :no undersigned, d.,..,-.:: of Southwest Weld Count ' kno ;:1 to the People o: W :a County, County tannin r2:,k• Co;r.::.:ssion and County `:c ,niss:o.:;`rs,Cof our othe p od itiolheipt Con. :ruction of cot;: c: ior;.,: facilityopposition nino the Pc^1- gen-cal vicinityoft:.,; : •5 ,y., to to the refrred co as Del Cabe, `and 1 d Use Development Area (rea of Inc,:rsca:t 25 and Colo:.) 119)more specifically in the area of or in any unincorporated area of Sou':scat Weld County. We petition out Commi prov::•ce for the cons: house convicted felon Department of Correct ,u?s co reject any and all proposals than ru;rr:or; of a correctional facility designed t. remanded to the custody of the Colorado :,,,. onc. Name (;:gnarl:_:) 1. s1i ••: i I C", Mailing Address City I1 J / 4t- s- (.;J ,947,5 8. -.•••••••, M. _ 1.1.14._L /. r 9.(.0Aka 0 9 1. 1 . M " .c, '' , ,`, _4.44 Dawn° & a 13. ../ /. Illl., 17.! 18.' 19.' 1 20. xD /4 r (7-7717777, SecLINN ) an.* AO \c 1n ..o: el -L I r.c'r,v Dep..r_men: •.Y t.: PETITION e•i l;J COUNTY, COLORADO G?:::I:,: COp :IJ5IJIJ & COUNTY CCMMIfs;o cPs •.:;>r+:i.ln:. res[crctof Southwest Weld a roe rect :' ; County, herer,y t 1•: People of de., )11 ', CO, t_hc We_;. Co';r. r: a..,.: r?.... . �,,-i Cnunry Corn o . :. .s, O :, of `_ our Gprr- �:' t. c•n to ^ ` ,. .•ln� f . lc lity to be located in the y of the I-2:/ mixed Use Develcprent Area (Cornonty' Del Camino, a:,: mare -specifically and Colorado tl9)c in 1-^' �,r:-e of 4 ;U County. or in any uru.nc,l.,.�r,�.„d za c. J..C ;:`:al]i:: C:: to reject proposals that w•._..• , ;.c• (-'1:•,structcn ofany and al; >-oposr.l ) a correctional facility :'eriornr. -_ is:ted felons remain,^d to the custo;iy c•° 'IC corrections. - "e _. u ("ien:aru:e) Mailing AddrC^s t. «yi Q A /1 .1* "s -i%7 1/45,4 I,.ir- ,J - ----�, ' J -12 ; l acif V/ Sna• l once o { S(UfZ> d .•/ /I • 1t (4 •/, • car".„,• 4 . I „8 20. L. r _ i 1(c✓l�Q. G v' pm A • 7/`-•{.ice,Co a- 1 1 I 1 1 • 931249 . c:''•:: ;:II "r" : •'v:L'l Y CCUu?Y, CQ:.:"RADO t LANs 'l;:JC �:u(:I•.:•.�:i _ •• +: COUNTY CUN.;M;;ttic\'S;r„•; i 1 I. r Cc,m:nis,:orls t, d 1'h de reject any and t.!r tre cor-.stru.'c r a.. facility :,our � lO:,, <,_ a Correctional that ' cci . rted felons study w. neparr.r.er1 r.as:�r1<icd ".-O the oust `..aci designed custody of r.h,. ��t,.:,,.ar,1 , We, she un known to Comm 1 s51 o: consi: UCL .. general . . referred iht.,.r;..:...t ... Sou .nw•:• 1 .:r. iien t or v::r C Southwest Weld County, hereby rr•;�: .ld County: CO, the ..Uai County Co.tuaissioncwa, c -f O,• opposition Couo!t 1e ••r ]1L. aE cort rece tional f.'•ciiity. to be be OCi!e:,!inr1Y.-le •.. as y 5 Mixed Use Develoan.nt . Cassino, an A-:.� r._.,T. .. .. •ir.d CU1 Jr.'.1.:- more nspecificallyany in ': `'ra ..i•J (7J/icy. ?J ec in anur.. ,et_.cro.': d •-+:7.. J Mailing Address C .y 1 . ,• r; p el a2lL/1atsn !7 13 I4. 1b. 14, 1s L Q. U • f r • • r ,r• 931249 rETTTIoN Ci ;: _ Y, .CCLORhaO '.,,nn41i7,; CG ;,KiS:,IJ;C .c C:C`f'NTY COMC4ISSIoN;P^ 0o:;, ' Southwest t:•� .., ... .ih County (:�•+^ ::1O. COF the:44,1C .o':nt.! o_ ,.�ri-, i' rj •.L <-f C nt ICc :i. ,_ f , facility our o�o�gjtiCn -o -..y? Zciia to be d, ..,1 the ':.z•:>:;,,.: .r+, .y :1` I `'.7.-2 Mixed Use De✓elop1`. n'. lce'1 (Col!R:on2 Com ,' (7 more specifically y .., . + 25 ..na Co.or::,io 119) or [�anyiical:.•,•- in tiro •re e c„cs w,' ^,i Count.y, in any unincc. or; M^d i ea of c -.•`+ . i'1,. Co,:m$sri ns `C( reject any end all pru c.sa'$ that w.,••• 1, ir(l,e . + a COrrertion,?t c r 1; • ie_pn3 re:7 , a ,C+ -, n^;'..r.. cc;cau to' the custc< ..`.v ?nA� .�f (2,-i L'C'Q•^.t ions ..y off lip r^n• _�,,� ,_• ,-' '' _� �fzl .d/q>,:.tr-<?,• (::;'J'„a.uto; ,.:lia ....._ g Address - /el i. t . -ten fu✓1 � ------.--. N+ ., G'r •, �•'' y I yiv. •- /?a..Y _ '•'rte El /.7L, //j, Szr-4ra zoce5vol zwA /_.S 2G• ----5191ea± I 1 I I I I I I- I r). 1 1 1 :GW? bs PETITION TO 1: W31.1) COUNTY, COLORADO - PLANNING c tM:J:i•zf:N ; COUNTY C'M.r • ss:.en�,•.+S d1 r.i••f:,f f'asi d- -s of Southwest we !OWnof N., C(1•.1.'1.. hereby mpr. to ac 2e•'iple 'aCounty, ' Cou:'.Ly. CO the Weld y an. yi eD.r.t:y Comti ,^.J oners, of our . oppot itt County t:e 'Z- cQ,IL: fcion of a c:or_ectinal facility to belocated n to ...e _• oc:::>< n the gene_al v:ciniLy of the 1-25 Mixed Use Development Area (commonly r"ferre te, as Del Camino, and more TpeCif' a r .�_ J.Cdl y in Yflp area of inter, n e .5 and Colorado 119) `outfJ,•st w . County. or in any unincorporated d:'A2 rjr _ .. .�u:�Cl. : rc.v. :' Y 'r .. construction of : 'fou::c ro;.v;cce:• icons remanded nepart.c ent- of C:orrcct:cns. e c_ any and a21 oi. oc'osals that Kot•': A. correctional. :. ar''..:y Perim.d c' to the custody •; c..o-rt iCigAaLure, Mailing Address City 7:7Ami.9 .. :�_..• (y.._..-� Ili K �'t'~L. G 4�' ( -'! IPJSi(� �'.L i•,%. rL.1HrL� cS�u. 3?•;' F,QE.EiDuf do. /1re riiest25:.> .r role 4%414- r 'r 1tiI ;� .� r J t l I�.�?c /l`•+-�� +7'.l✓i_...+++-a/—�LJri-,., 1"yu>.SM..(a.�, ,, I�(yJN. ' (y�,.� /� 12)./F At nrAmaa.:19.42i./i/S":232Cittifli:4.C.C1Cifien;4:7 ..ed- .._ 'g •I:loos_ �� 1 ' , t.Lid:{hiL -G:.._ '_Ly`1/-7 .._-- -_ __ )__ 9"1249 r ✓ v� f / r._s to _x: bry /, , ' !� . ..`... , „,)7,1'., f:.11'r.yr. � 1 '' :;� �:+ J711..)1F'bet W(2.14cuur.• ' t • I� ). i. ,, d1 . ..r,, J• CO, th?o';r ...)'l.'l: '�.. .. • �,C -,i it ! � or O4L . ,r... ..-.i ,..1<j use Dev.l _, :,; if. any ,1 wde p , . ra:.z,s;i )l to .1 CC(. P .11 prat)U: 1 .a C.Ittt l'UlC 1 '... Of 1, CJTrv.:t'r X11.' 1•C.i . i _'l.: y,, ..., IIOL 1_ ./. .1 Ua:. .. .. `rJ 4 '"?..41/ ,_.__- S_!,1 tv/use c 7 / 1 is • f, > c IM - 1 401=4-'l7vi saz _ _ -- - ` �// :LL�.�1-�'—_ _- A4.1,42e4" a'-• • Ltt 1, PA0 .1 Ftlirj F , u, a,. AiL9y�fPrdr S Zj< � 1 ..:..:t. -1. J .... 3. ._� � Or.Q7'li/ 1'�(�..i iii .. / , a.... .C . - _I J (t& ,.2dv �9yY �t�,nl i 'C.1a./��c'17y "`°'u'�/�0�-.. pC. IBS c'�• • v>n�/� /<� may, i 4Zic , puw. , �_1�,.... c1F�c!)✓�� 1/c 71 : - - LON.4'hzcNr. 2o?el 1 1. 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 931249 4. PEOPLES PETITION,: _ ritz WELD COUNTY,- COLORADO • PLANNING COMMISSION 6 COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 1 1 1 1 1 1 '^`•', the undersigned, residents of Southwest Weld Count 'mown to the People or 4.s,ld County, CO, the Weld County r Cort,; pion aad County Y. hereby 'm.rk,• Co:+s r.Ccion d a y Commissioners, of our. opposition lheipr correctional -acilit to to the proposed gene• ai vicinity of '_ c .-25 Mixed Y to pent Area in the :erred to as Del Camino Use Development Area (commonly of `•'�terstate 25 and Colorado'119 more specifically in the area of or in any unincorporated area of Southwest weld County. We ;)tue ition our Commissions to reject any and all propesals that would houseprovideoforcthe e confelstruns ti, remanded f to, a correctional facility the Y designed to Colorado State Department of Corrections. Name :S.ig.'t&rc7 `•.m.dm. 4. // ,72 , 5 : '� .l• •i. !./ e. 10. �i 1~ r iS• ;,i 1 r‘ie16. ./, •/,/j'li ,J 1742' t 3 . t 20.` Mailing Address C City EOPLES PETITION TO 1HE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PLANNING COMMISSION & COUNTY COMMISSIONERS We, the undersigned, residents of Southwest Weld.County, hereby make known to the People of Weld County, CO, the Weld County Planning Commission and County Commissioners, of our opposition to the proposed construction of a correctional facility to be located in the general vicinity of the 1-25 Mixed Use Development Area (commonly referred to as Del Camino, and more specifically in the area of* Interstate 25 and Colorado 119) or in any unincorporated area of Southwest Weld County. We petition our Commissioners to reject any and all proposals that would provide for the construction of a correctional facility designed to house convicted felons remanded to the custody of the Colorado State Department of Corrections. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16: 17. 18. 19. 20. Name (Signature) Mailing Address City ZIP 1 �`• c4 ,c G 8 5"G 14k Oa n • 675 cue,,Z6 ' /oMCe / L6168 LOCit .2b Lo" 5.0,-.04. t't . G`. /Ll -O v3/6! W(C", R a t, .`jciy S80504�4o- o a; eLtjp 9 3 le 're• 1_4 'fit / i t- a'2, 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 EOPLES PTTITLON TO THE WELD COUNTY; COLORADO PLANNING COMMISSION 4 COUNTY COMMISSIONERS we, the undersigned, residents of Southwest Weld County, hereby make known to the People of Weld County, CO, the Weld County Planning Commission and County Commissioners, of our opposition to the proposed construction of a correctional facility to be located in the general vicinity of the 1-25 Mixed Use Development Area (commonly referred to as Del :Camino, and more specifically in the area. of. Interstate 25 and Colorado 119) or in any unincorporated area of Southwest weld County. We petition our Commissions to reject any and all proposals that would provide for the construction of a correctional facility designed toy house convicted felons remanded to the custody of the Colorado State Department of Corrections. 1. I 2. 1 3. 4. 5. 6. 17. Name (Signature) itt/ Q912 d Mailing Address Ara ate Pl/3 City ZIP 105o4 8oS7 20. 9.31249 ?EOPLES.PETITION TO TnE'-WELD--COUNTY, COLORADO PLANNING COMMISSION 6"COUNTY COMMISSIONERS We, the undersigned, residents of Southwest Weld County, hereby make known to the People of Weld County, CO, the Weld County Planning Commission and County Commissioners, ofour opposition to the proposed construction of a correctional facility to be located in the general vicinity of the 1-25 Mixed Use Development Area (commonly referred to as Del Camino, and more specifically in the area of. 'Interstate 25 and Colorado 119) or, in any unincorporated area of Southwest Weld County. We petition our Commissions to reject any and all proposals that would provide for the construction of a correctional facility designed to • house convicted felons remanded to the custody of the Colorado State Department of Corrections. Name (Signature) Mailing Address City ZIP 1. eg7z—z --._..4 6.s1wf i .2G 2. Ja,9! G,e �'.7. .. ei1/ An-eVWcf 3 '"! a �� a �a AAi-.'.--/ / 5 p y 4)c/7111i rfo1Aibp 662.?Wc'_tuu 74:_ 5. "Nan.. Z . 71j 1.4.,_&k. C I 6. fol+rk ��eu 11'1117 8. •I1}l</ .W0 /47/3 /6/ eft') /3 4. 7. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17 18. 19. 20. ' Y Ufria dOn ,//`//3 //MR /3 knyniont i7 I' CCvs.yLohT P,, / 0.'g &K R l-? �ef10ll�Pn X 147 h t4W 17 1121 7 1/� c / •2f! i/ //.a.rf,,..... .... 1O �, 1 / u 3 -Pa LI ) 3 2,C. I Wcn for LI Ctt ?acct./ f105"7/ It ft eOSott ScSsY X0657 . )Ro6 51 u?fU Eti4se:- Lucie 28 /%7>/ it/ //5" v Lowe ffo7i��. sr.,/ -. j0So7 ;a_ j;4-11AvilACAA if ..At ., Cqtex a - 11a /G 4)cr213 I I I I I I I I I I I�1. i4- -c1 ' -. I I • ... :OPLES PETITION• TO THE WELD .COUNTY, COLORADO PLANNING COMMISSION & COUNTY COMMISSIONERS We, the undersigned, residents of Southwest Weld County, hereby make 'known to the People of Weld County, CO, the Weld County Planning Commission and County Commissioners, of our opposition to the proposed construction of a correctional facility to be located in the 'general vicinity of the 1-25 Mixed Use Development Area (commonly referred to as Del Camino, and more specifically in the area of Interstate 25 and Colorado 119) or in any unincorporated area of Southwest weld County. 'Lie petition our Commissions to reject any and all proposals that would provide for the construction of a correctional facility designed to house convicted felons remanded to the custody of the Colorado State Department of Corrections. 13. 4. 15. Name (Signature) Mailing Address City r .. y$Ffin F nMo 7O?Q 1�,Q Crnin. ILm t, !, ra _ A 4 o So �<: nd- -3O M:- ililhatti 900 Ape/ . l awe l- ,_.._,' , ory-i '-1 cicRa Pr.:wan-LIRA RA C-,1 e- .7a5 Srtsiia ac4 tD$Di �i-'F�SrRt / C/yJd �PA��I•�."�fl 4/'r,2..",1 (r9oY. / r / / iff' / eithifI14, ., 4r?G( /ff?�Iri,It- X5C yi,:at ., ,i.0,4, ;, /960 Jfitemez , rsusi X2Qc- SZon-,L e Qw 51, iQ.trc / U.O �Z Lf,.re• jai fA ek 'TOVS �['�,•� 91. �7 U • i_i '�.� �J a 3 � �s.zk,� Co � acntnrrX 52n53,2 /?'4 c / ,j KejytedheAr Se 0-451 r �.e :7 Z s•23 i 40CGZ a I 1 (,o :....t co%D Y P"OPLES Ns.:;TI'TION. - TO TH1 IELD, COUNTY, : COLORADO PLAMNINc COMMISSION & COUNT? CO:±M,SSIONERS We, the undersigned, residents of Southwest weld County, hereby make known to the People of Weld County, CO, the weld County Planning Commission and County Commissioners, of our opposition to the proposed construction of a correctional facility to be located in the general vicinity of the 1-25 Mixed Use Develcoment Area (commonly 'referred to as -Del Camino, and more specifical_y in the--erea of Interstate 25 and Colorado 119) or in any unf.ncorporated area o+: Southwest Weld County. We petition our Commissions to reject any and all proposals that would provide for the construction of a correctional facility designed to house convicted felons remanded to the custoc.y of the Colorado State Department of Corrections. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. a. 9. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. Nine (Signature) I tiprs_t_c_1/44 • 4 Mailing -Address City ZIP Laade >a` ---1LoKyia�aL ?OS0 � r` r f v mfr t Efoie< 1 fly/c a.Hg'/�"- Le405144telhreoce, I I 1 OPLES 1't,riTION TO THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PLANNING COMMISSION 6 COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ',We, the undersigned, residents of Southwest Weld County, hereby make known to the People of Weld County, CO, the Weld County Planning Commission and County Commissioners, of our opposition to the proposed construction of a correctional facility to be located in the general vicinity of the I-25 Mixed Use Development Area (commonly referred to as Del Camino, and more specifically in the area of Interstate 25 and Colorado 119) or in any unincorporated area of t• Southwest Weld County. We petition our Commissions to reject any and all proposals that would provi',house housede for the construction correctional convicted felons remanded tothe custody ofcthe tColorado eState Department. of Corrections. 6. 8. 9. 115- 16. Name (Signature) Mailing Address City ZIP 1 • */.r r— ng4ice Au 4,,,, t eV 4't M t 10409 9;1249 Mailing Address City ZIP 11 11 11 11 11 11 ._.EOPLES PETITION _ TO THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PLANNING COMMISSION & COUNTY COMMISSIONERS We, the undersigned, residents of Southwest. Weld County, hereby make known to the People of Weld County, CO, the Weld County Planning Commission and County Commissioners, of our opposition to the proposed construction general vicinity aofothe C1-258Mixedtionl iUseYDevelopmenttArean(cthe ommonly referred to as Del Camino, and more specifically in the area of• 'Interstate 25 and Colorado 119) or in any unincorporated area of Southwest Weld County. We petition our Commissions to reject any and all proposals that would provide for the. construction of a correctional facility designed to house convicted felons remanded to the custody of the Colorado State Department of Corrections. Name (Signature) 7, 3 4. 11 5• 6. 7. 9,31249 'OPLES PETITION' TO THc WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PLANNING COMMISSION'& COUNTY COMMISSIONERS We, the undersigned, residents of Southwest Weld County, hereby make Commission known to the People of Weld County, CO, the Weld County Planning and constructionofCuo to th ners, of 0uacorrectionalfacility.to,rbeplocatednin thee proposed general vicinity of the 1-25 Mixed Use Development Area (commonly referred to as Del Camino, and more specifically in the area of Interstate 25 and Colorado 119)' or in any unincorporated area of Southwest Weld County. We petition our Commissions to reject any and all -proposals that would provide for the construction of a correctional facility designedto house convicted felons remanded to the custody of the Colorado State Department of Corrections. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. me (Signature) Mailing Address attain City ZIP ® /C IIIIIIIII I t l nroe ur; ve y �+r 1 !' I; 1; I 1 9:,1249: Name (Signature) Mailing Address City zIP I I .OPLES PETITION TO THE WELD COUNTY,`COLORADD PLANNING COMMISSION -6 COUNTY COMMISSIONERS IEe, the undersigned, residents of Southwest Weld County, hereby make nown to the People of Weld County, CO, the Weld County Planning ommission and County Commissioners, of our opposition to the proposed IIonstruction of a correctional facility to be located in the eneral vicinity of the 1-25 Mixed Use Development Area (commonly eferred to as Del Camino, and more specifically in the area of • Interstate 25 and Colorado 119) or in any unincorporated area of •outhwest Weld County. We petition our Commissions to reject any and all proposals that would I ousede for the d to convicted felons uremanded toction of a cthe ecustody ofctional Cthe tColoradoy eState epartment of Corrections. I 1� 2. 4. 067 92124q r _EOPLES PETITION TO THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PLANNING COMMISSION 6 COUNTY COMMISSIONERS We, the undersigned, residents of Southwest Weld County, hereby make known to the People of Weld County, CO, the Weld County Planning Commission and County Commissioners, of our opposition to the proposed construction of a correctional facility to be located in the general vicinity of the I-25 Mixed Use Development Area (commonly referred to as Del Camino, and more specifically in the area of' 'Interstate 25 and Colorado 119) or in any unincorporated area of Southwest Weld County. We petition our Commissions to reject any and all provide for the construction of a correctional facilitysdesigned als that would house convicted felons remanded to the custody of the Colorado State Department of Corrections. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. Name (Signature) Mailing Address City ZIP Wr,, CamseriamillnidE MIERMIll...._SiautninaMillal ale/U u11, in MIN NM. 1 __921249 To 'F 1:.41:..L) C JN1 Y...COLORADO PLANNItJC, COMMISSION 4 COUNTY COMMISSIONERS We, the undersigned, make CO/ residents of Southwest Weld Count known nwnsto thandeople ofCWeldsCounty, CO, the Weld County' �Planning . ' Commissionon andCounty a correctional • of our opposition to the general construction onal facility to be located in proposed referred vicinity of the T-25 Mixed Use Development Area the to as Del Camino, and more specifically (commonly of.y Interstate 25 and Colorado 119) or in any in the area of Southwest Weld Count. unincorporated area p. ' We petition our Commissions to reject any and all Provide for the construction of a Correctional.fadiiiCy design house PFoposals that :,•culd. convicted felons remanded to the Custody of the Coloradeesrate Department of Corrections. State Name (Signature) Mailing Address City ZIP Yliu1iLt3 cLAILsuN TO TvWELD COUNTY, COLORADO PLANNING COMMISSION 6 COUNTY COMMISSIONERS We, the undersigned, residents of Southwest Weld County,,hereby make known to the People of Weld County, CO, the Weld County Planning Commission and County Commissioners, of our opposition to the proposed construction of a correctional facility to be located in the general vicinity of the I-25 Mixed Use Development Area (commonly referred to as Del Camino, and more' specifically in the area of Interstate 25 and Colorado 119) or in any unincorporated area of Southwest weld County. We petition our Commissions to reject any and all proposals that would provide for the construction of a correctional facility designed to house convicted felons remanded to the custody of the Colorado State Department of Corrections. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. Name {Signature) Mailing Address City ZIP _.... �w./.ar: :rda./� • .-i,. \ 0lt'.if) a3 _ W ' 0.7 4344 jaC.R fa, Fr,e; 514()..,51b &i mp i . I ok -- rigri II )a et ?4.r,� 4-Nlea)�.- (59 to. C•,e-lam lett /6 u . A .1 t1, klirru o 'S^Y/6D f r A4. 'P %'f ?re'S 1, 805 b an: _wider! 5117 / G F k I''2- ESE ad 9DI C?aoua £'. / Boo CO1\\1lia kl11(cy.yin <5{Ill040A Ott 11Q ,� 1'/` S L -/ - n 4//7 S/(1, ;' ;5y(ii c� ?OVA - ' SI71) /1/2 ei- `h jrt--s' A , ),---;-)00-F i 0 it F'/ f pi r pis///f 'Ill A/.it 6/ OS . lir fay« --.0 : )PLES PETITION ' TO THE WELD COUNTY,, COLORADO PLANNING COMMISSION A COUNTY COMMISSIONERS , the undersigned, residents of Southwest Weld County, hereby make own to the People of Weld County, CO; the Weld County Planning mmission and County Commissioners, of our opposition to the proposed construction of a correctional facility to be located in the Ineral vicinity of the 1-25 Mixed Use Development Area (commonly ferred to as Del Camino, and more specifically in the area of • Interstate 25 and Colorado 119) or in any unincorporated area of Iruthwest Weld County. We petition our Commissions to reject any and all proposals that would Itovide for the construction of a correctional facility designed to use convicted felons remanded to the custody of the Colorado State partment of Corrections I I 4. L I I 9. 1. 14. 1. r. 19. Name (Signature). .Mailing-Address- pcsr, 4 /n, A ig 5 // Uzi (vc& 7 G "era?f Lai' 16%0 / 1 4)74044) Mailing Address _507/ wee( /s' PVOPLES PETITION - TO TH1_IELD COUNTY,. COLORADO PLANNING COMMISSION & COUNTY COMMISSIONERS we, the undersigned, residents of Southwest Weld County, hereby make known to the People of Weld County, CO, the Weld County Planning Commission and County Commissioners, of our opposition to the proposed construction of a correctional facility, to be located in the general vicinity of the 1-25 Mixed Use Development Area (commonly referred to as Del, Camino, and more specifically in the area of Interstate 25 and Colorado 119) or in any unincorporated area of► Southwest Weld County. We petition our Commissions to reject any and all proposals that would ,provide for the construction of a correctional facility designed to house convicted felons remanded to the custody of the.Colorado State Department of Corrections. Name (Signature) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 13. City ZIP stag' , trorsit 8i 'e( I . _'uLLES NETIT.ION ' TO.TH- WELD,COUNTY, COLORADO PLANNING COMMISSION & COUNTY 'COMMISSIONERS We, the undersigned, residents of Southwest Weld County, hereby make 'nown to the People of Weld County, CO, the Weld County Planning ommission and County Commissioners, of our opposition to the proposed • construction of a correctional facility to be located in the Ileeneral vicinity of the 1.25 Mixed Use Development Area (commonly ferred to as Del.Camino, and more specifically in the area of nterstate 25 and Colorado 119) or in any unincorporated area of' Southwest Weld County. ILpetition our Commissions to reject any and all proposals that would provide for the construction of a correctional facility designed to ' douse convicted felons remanded to the custody of the Colorado State Ilepartment of Corrections. i. Name (Signature) Mailing Address 4o egok It` City ZIP J/Oi ilia/Syr /8 L5705' Oaf -zr' v0.A 0136 we 15, air 47_78 j_5 13`i_ in .0 Ito ,-!5 "b o4- 1 LL S137 we -,& 16. `-k c�-: S'p tea. Soso y -.,�.�..,, f ,co o/ taro' Pa ail Area y 06-07 -644 1/!14) „, 1 • 0e W, adt?,J 5053 WC, /ti cRiR/ tvdR moisAi 16. -7 . n CA -114 .0e 4'. 'l aims, (/) C L ( U 5 3a s wc.C /6.3% .7,373 u'cR -,4' -erYdR lb 'q 'Impint io5o5' Zgintitti finch sect . . cosoit &99 lice #8 �j (0.3%1 go t4 73-3 yol n /' a O... w APLES PETITION TO THE WELD: COUNTY, COLORADO PLANNING COMMISSION & COUNTY COMMISSIONERS We, the undersigned, residents of Southwest Weld County, hereby make known to the People of Weld County, CO, the Weld County Planning Commission and County Commissioners, of our opposition to the proposed construction of a correctional facility to be located in the general vicinity of the I-25 Mixed Use Development Area (commonly referred to as Del Camino, and more specifically in the area of Interstate 25 and Colorado 119) or in anyunincorporated area of Southwest Weld County. We petition our Commissions to reject any and all proposals that would provide for the construction of a correctional facility designed to house convicted felons remanded to the custody of the`Colorado State Department of Corrections. ame (Signature) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. Mailing Address City ZIP W t114 COUNTY, cCOLORADO PLANNING COMMISSION & COUNTY COMMISSIONERS We, the undersigned, residents of Southwest Weld County, hereby make known to the'People of Weld Count IICommission County County, CO, the Weld County•Planning construction and f a Commissioners, of our opposition to the general vicinity correctional facility to be located in the proposed referred to as Del fCamino, the 2and Mo5 revspese cificallynint Athe area of lY Southwest Weld County. Interstate 25 and Colorado 119) or in any unincorporated area of We petition our Commissions co reject any and all proposals that would • provide for the construction of a correctional.facility designed to house convicted felons..remanded to the custody of the Colorado State Department of Corrections. Name (Signature) Mailing Address City ZIP WPMMien fern? , e ,6 OPLES PETITION TO THE,' WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PLANNING COMMISSION & COUNTY COMMISSIONERS We, the undersigned, residents of Southwest Weld County, hereby make known to the People of Weld County, CO, the Weld County Planning Commission and County Commissioners, of our opposition to the proposed construction of a correctional facility to be located in the general vicinity of the I-25 Mixed Use Development Area (commonly referred to as Del Camino, and more specifically in the area of. Interstate 25 and Colorado 119) or in any unincorporated area of Southwest Weld County. We petition our Commissions to reject any and all proposals that would housed convicted felonse for the uremanded toction of a ctheecustody of thectional tCy oloradoeState Department of Corrections. Name (Signature) Mailing Address City ZIP I! ries' .OE'LES PETITION TO THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PLANNING COMMISSION & COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ke, the undersigned, residents of Southwest Weld County, hereby make nown to the People of Weld County, CO, the Weld County Planning Commission and County Commissioners, of our opposition to the proposed Ionstruction of a correctional facility to belocated in the eneral vicinity of the 1-25 Mixed Use Development Area (commonly eferred to as Del Camino, and more specifically in the area of' Interstate 25 and Colorado 119) or in any unincorporated area of 1outhwest Weld County. We petition our Commissions to reject any and all proposals that.. would I[zovide for the construction of a correctional facility designed to ouse convicted' felons remanded to the custody of the Colorado. State epartment of Corrections. :1 I. 9. `o. 12. 1. ,3. 19. 10. Name (Signature) Mailing Address City ZIP c.i, , 1 7& 5 4-c.? 6eedlc..0 005/3 SA NPf A cAu DE J 8-7R 4 wc✓t ' A RA- wrkw..A /ilru d cow l ✓ '5S/j ,t....JJ O6 •9 i / y. /24, -&4- Si /Head itratiz C s c -t_. 1b%,11a \-JCecI \• avtTa,, sSoc.sl t12_ $o 47 3 17 R- e.1oac., I.uw\S 2- eg / 79.c c R 3 �',.d'r/ l PPA,Afign ,,,-,,,%. IL leg t.0et, R 32 Ro,4l4'x1,Sv C_ 4 /1}IPA V 1Gl•1),c,n e 3C, Aeltles/ `o 1 Wit-- fAc/i d 11,60 Or . 7? Ap aa k'n i;! e .Mi.i fj 41a4,ka in L2x3 f1/llJS\. ./0117 olio? 7% i> iii l� a. `...., /mss' -- c✓c/a .Z9 c\ tt&Jo.... to t/ _Wc-42 3fe t 44,..i.-.4 ceoSis /010 ?SAS Ulli3 h ,y__. :).'SjS Wc-C Vie - fs5L3 yo si .G,..._ ,..2 a 9 `J _ . u,c,Z 3. V '.kc iQ.n f L ..5,- it 3./ . fl�ktfsJ/c .�x.Y 1 inv moo, d mz,29/eid, 7 4frend # r//a ..tetynsi A .IAISM - EOPLES PETITION• TO THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PLANNING COMMISSION 6 COUNTY COMMISSIONERS We, the undersigned, residents of Southwest Weld County, hereby make known to the People of Weld County, CO, the Weld County Planning Commission and County Commissioners, of our opposition to the proposed construction of a correctional facility to' be located in the general vicinity of the I-25 Mixed Use Development Area (commonly referred to as Del Camino, and more specifically in the area of• Interstate 25 and Colorado 119) or in any unincorporated area of Southwest Weld County. We petition our Commissions to reject any and all proposals that would provide for the construction of a correctional facility designed to house convicted felons remanded to the custody of the Colorado State Department, of Corrections. Name (Signature) 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16: 17. 18. 19. 20. Mailing Address City ZIP 1 EOPLES PETITI0N_ TO THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PLANNING COMMISSION b COUNTY COMMISSIONERS • We, the undersigned, residents of Southwest Weld County, hereby make known to the People of Weld County, CO, the Weld County Planning Commission and County Commissioners, of our opposition to the proposed construction of a correctional facility to be located in the IlLneral vicinity of the 1-25 Mixed Use Development Area (commonly referred to as Del Camino, and more specifically in the area of Interstate 25 and Colorado 119) or in any unincorporated area of 'Southwest Weld County. We petition our Commissions to reject any and all proposals that would ICrovide for the construction of a.correctional facility designed to ouse convicted felons remanded to the custody of the Colorado State epartment of Corrections. 1 9. 10. 13. 14. '5. 19. Name (Signature) Mailing Address City ZIP roLouet -' La i C r i sfee O , P/D.C30x .z s, soy a'!w,ta >i*ers/rWe a 3/25 -c? -O J','tr5l�3.e, �r Q IQtrrQ+k- ers52O Po.5:Ro PJBpY aos �'>y nnit fritat" 3 e, R Er�,ni i t AV fr-:',gE5Trif c Rosh o d fr v I;rec ti r.(o.5..2 La -ivy t&o.s Fi'Entx'ieK, e loci x 1 1 9/0147 Q,O,)11 i _ 9212.14 �' OPLES PETITION TO THr WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PLANNING COMMISSION & COUNTY COMMISSIONERS We, the undersigned, residents of Southwest Weld County, hereby make known to the People of Weld County, CO, the Weld County Planning Commission and County Commissioners,- of our opposition to the proposed construction of a correctional facility to be located in the general vicinity of the 1-25 Mixed Use Development Area (commonly referred to as Del Camino, and more specifically in the area of. Interstate 25 and Colorado 119) or in any unincorporated area of Southwest Weld County. We petition our Commissions to reject any and all proposals that would provide for the construction of a correctional facility designed to house convicted felons remanded to the'custody of the Colorado State Department of Corrections. Name (Si nature) �. / 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. Mailing Address City ZIP EOPLES :PETITION TO ThE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PLANNING COMMISSION & COUNTY COMMISSIONERS -'We, the undersigned, residents of Southwest Weld County, hereby make known to the People of Weld County,. CO, the Weld County Planning Commission and County Commissioners, of our opposition to the proposed construction of a correctional facility to be located in the 'general vicinity of the I-25 Mixed Use Development Area (commonly referred to as Del Camino, and more specifically inthe area of• Interstate 25 and Colorado 119) or in any unincorporated area of 'Southwest Weld County. We petition our Commissions to reject any and all proposals that would 'provide for the construction of a correctional facility designed to house convicted felons remanded to the custody of the Colorado State Department of Corrections. 1 I1. 2. '3. 4. 15. Name (Signature) A/11 PlitHr Q. et --ti 1 -1 ice :..e.hrs,%11 Ally/10 9 15. I6- 7. Mailing Address City ZIP 37// C c'c ?o/ /9/Drwn 761 `ZJ ..P(. /3/,/R' Acie? 1, . Dc 07484 inn)� /37 /7 "- ard /0-2? !L<44 -e' l/..c-/....�Irr,2c /12, 4)erk 7g Lograxi i7"Sta Vniumbil e/25r4 Afro-tg/ Lau, 1.9.& 41/' LP/ t`i irtle A1//<y 931249.. P' ?LES PETITION TO THE`WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PLANNING COMMISSION & COUNTY COMMISSIONERS we, the undersigned, residents of Southwest Weld County, hereby make known to the People of Weld County,' CO, the weld County Planning Commission and County Commissioners, of our opposition to the proposed construction -of a correctional. facility to be located in the general vicinity of the 1-25 Mixed Use Development Area (commonly referred to as Del Camino, and more specifically in the area of • Interstate 25 and Colorado 119) or in any unincorporated area of Southwest Weld County. we petition our Commissions to reject any and all proposals that would - provide for the construction of. a correctional facility designed to house convicted felons remanded to the custody of the Colorado State Department of Corrections. Name (Signature) Mailing Address City ZIP 5. 8. 9 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 437fr9r)clig 4400 V 13253 U ,4 /YfirAvg QTfI o-r.� Co. Saco �� r'o_s& lister4- \n_ `4 i 4 co cAJe.(2."ag ,io1o' &50) antaine4 sot 1 Ztt 20. — ._...__ 9uf49 II i 0 itTITION Tllc .F LD COU[Y: Y, COLC p..& ' PLANNING C:OMAl'; S10„ SCOUNTY CO!+,•;1SSIONLRS We, the Undersigned, residents of Southwest Weld If own to the People of Welt County, County, Planning anmake mmissio:� and Courts Commissioners, CO, the weld -County mmission andf a y Commissioners, of our opposition to the iteneral vicinity ofothe c1l25aMil xedlUse vDevelopmto be entyArea n com (commonly ferred to as Del Camino, and more specifical.., n the area""ofly terstate 2S and Colorado 119) or in any uninc•.•rpo,eed arca o; Southwest Weld County. 4 petiti-,n our Commissions to reject any and all proposals provide for the construction of a correctional facility designed Ito II convicted felons remanded that would �partment of Corrections, to the custody of the Colorado State 1.' 8. I 91 11. 13. 1 15 16. Li 18 9 !Signature) Mailing Address O I2?Lo Vuene 7C4e4 city Z1° LOA.wW4' O So , s{S— S �� tI !ht.- I�''__ �----- — - ._ _._. _ �`"k ~• 931249 , 'EOPLES PETITION TO 9aE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PLANNING COMMISSION & COUNTY; COMMISSIONERS we, the undersigned, residents of Southwest weld County, hereby make known to the People of Weld County, CO, the Weld County Planning Commission and County, Commissioners, of our opposition to the proposed construction of a correctional facility to be located in the general vicinity of the I-25 Mixed Use Development Area (commonly referred to as Del Camino, and more specifically in the area (Dfr Interstate 25 and Colorado 119), or in any unincorporated area of Southwest Weld County. We petition our Commissions to reject any and all proposals that would provide for the construction of a correctional facility designed to house convicted felons remanded to the -custody of the Colorado State Department of Corrections. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 20. Name (Signature) Mailing Address City ZIP --r..----2- ! /33k� bte . `/ . � cer,,M. Cec '* 14-7,-1-, I r 2 i3 eY , j. eoso1` Fe:s i vsgal ,.# • /236 i& 4af• y Sv4 Lo 1 <Siy W , c, 13 . resrb,t8051 yoe M-vrG;" . 44 lc .ri1.vr "ca /??7/ /Lin,*. G ut5..,7 luny n4oilliurrG/ �/2 &WIG Pei 32 4o�spiat* $6 Ai, A1/2. -.1. ,r- 4743 Mgr +:„..r , ld..:„, - a c . ,8c14,1,Q lam S•1-. U ,.., .. Rd. _ La g`'2 9394 `N. Ls. £._.Y,,:t wa Soso. *sty ;gcvv wept 7 -1 n2a t, y Co G /ate ,,..f KoS --,�I`�".- //l 1 Ai ,7‘?( rat3 2 3 Lowyrea:031y _4. 4r C22Ila...F7 (at. Goes frioni 4.`"*4? PQsoy Pam n,_av ¢J-7,� �/ "'? Zei _ -.^4--eac_. /712 ;se ✓4s -/ ~Al cosn1 ` 37 . nn I Coe'19Crr nu -4. S/5/r/.9�_ s1- s ie2pS•SGAt LS., 9,117 o53y 6°4' .(c 4ec i 94249 1 THE SIGN SHALL BE POSTED ADJACENT TO AND VISIBLE FROM A PUBLICLY MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF- 'WAY. IN THE EVENT THE PROPERTY UNDER CONSIDERATION IS NOT ADJACENT TO A PUBLICLY MAINTAINED ROAD RICHT-OF-WAY, THE APPLICANT SHALL POST ONE SIGN IN THE MOST PROMINENT PLACE ON THE PROPERTY AND POST A SECOND SIGN AT THE POINT AT WHICH THE DRIVEWAY (ACCESS DRIVE) INTERSECTS A PUBLICLY MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY. 1 PLANNING COMMISSION SIGN POSTING CERTIFICATE 1 I HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER THE PENALTIES OF PERJURY THAT THE SIGN PROVIDED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES WAS POSTED ON THE PROPERTY AT LEAST 10 DAYS BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING FOR CASE # S ` '4' THE 'SIGN WAS POSTED BY: I D."011H 7 Cop lac NAME OF PERSON POSTING SIGN SONATURE OF APPLIVAM STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. COUNTY OF WELD )' SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO ME THISDAY OF SEAL, ` r . acret_ir----cs NOTARY PUBLIC & MY COMMISSION EXPIRES ilimajosktali e q c 'LAST DAY TO POST SIGN IS: P.1-(rn ) . 3 ,19(43. , 1993. 'PLEASE RETURN THIS FORM TO THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES' OFFICE ON OR BEFORE THE DATE OF THE HEARING. .1 Weld Co=tillaaeles 9433249 1 1 Weld County Department of Planning Services 1400 N. 17th Ave. Greeley, Colorado 80631 Planning and Zoning Board Members: September 30, 1993 As concerned citizens of Southwestern Weld County, we are asking ' you to turn down Villa's appliciation for a Pre -Parole Facility in the DelCamino Area. We believe that this is not the proper Iarea for a prison. It -is to close to our schools and the mobile homes and shopping area of Del Camino. We also believe that it Iwill bring the gang members' and the crimes that are related to gang activities to the area. Never again will we be able to enjoy the life styles that we now have. We will always have to be looking 1 over our shoulders and behind us to feel safe in the environment if the prison is allow in this area. ' We do not think that we should have to pay for the police proctection, fire, and ambulance service for the prison. We now have only one deputy sheriff which is not sufficient but better than nothing. II The jobs and the wages will be going out of this part of the county. These prisoners should not be our problem and we should let Denver 1 and the bigger cities take care of their problems. Quit dumping all the trash in our area. ' Please consider our feelings and•turn down Villa's appliciation for a Pre -Parole Facility and let other business have a chance ' to improve our area work and revenue. Thank you, O",1.."vim 1 Telephone call received October 4, 1993, from Lucy Stromquist, who owns property within three miles of the proposed site. She is concerned about the impact on the neighborhood and welfare roles of unemployed families moving into the area to be near inmates. She is concerned about the unlimited potential for this type of facility to expand. This area is not the right place for this. S721249 1 SEP-27-1993 16:34 K.C.W.G. .4 Goesucm. KIRGIS. CAMPBELL. WALKCR AHD GROVER ATTORN CIS AT LAW Suite 1100 1.101 SNCNYCCNTN STRCCT DCNVCR.COLORADQ eoao2-9024 MAILING LOORCS5 M. 0. sox 171a0 OCNvCR, GoLePA00 Yos.r.oleo TCLGIMCNC (0031 299.8900 Par C3031290.02., 00LONA0o ....Nos oinet 150.0 .00 O 0 Leann .w. f0.Gnro noss.cu.r N 04.-0t . na 1.9I.inns. • .Y 4.n.Jl a.0.00aO Iu 1...C• .M I September 27, 1993 Weld County Planning Commission Administrative Offices 1460 North 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 .•ye ton M ....w4n .n400 aa0•i..ON• nen aJa'alaa.e ..�+ aa.UN- 793 2% 0215 P.003,007 •sue •I•__ a 60.4.. aa• 4.418 a..M I. —v .._ .ya. M •.••••••• IIo_ .Want --S ..••••01...2.4.0•00. + Man yen �YOf nanted. IMN 4Iaaa Re: Case No. 5-344 The Villa at Greeley Inc. Members of the Commission: I have been retained to represent the Concerned Citizens of Southwest Weld County in regard to the referenced application. The purpose of this letter is to provide you with an overview of the legal argument and testimony which we will present during the hearing on October 5. At that time, we will deliver more detailed written argument and will present a number of wi on individual points. Our overall presentation will not be brief, but will be organized in a manner which will make good use of our time and yours. We look forward to the October 5 hearing. ACTION REQUESTED The Concerned Citizens urge the Commission to recommend denial of the application until such time as the underlying POD district has been amended to allow prison uses. The process of amending the POD district will best serve the interests of the County, its residents, the local community and the Applicant, as all parties consider whether a prison is appropriate in this area. 6ID\99994\77066.1 1 SEP 27 '93 15:35 303 298 0215 PAGE.003 1 931249 M 5Q-27-1993 1635 n •C 298 0215 P.004/007 1 1 1 1 1 Weld County Planning Commission September 27, 1993 Page 2 REASONS tot- R8CO1OflDATIOM 0r DZ MAX. This overview is intended -to assist the Commission- in evaluating the Application and to, serve as the framework for our . presentation at the October hearing; - - 1. --The Fort Junction PUD Distr.-at has, been abandoned. The original' PUD district was, approved in early 1989.: The Weld County Zoning Ordinance requires the:landowner to either (1) present a PUD Plan application. within one year of the:PUD district approval, or (2) present evidence "substantiating that the PUD project has not bean abandoned . ." Section 28.15.5. My review of the file:has disclosed•thatthis annual requirement was not fulfilled by the -landowner in 1990, in. 1991, or in 1992. The present PUD Plan application was filed at least four (4) years after the PUD district was approved. 2. Prison uses were -sot-aontemplate4 at the time the Port Junction PUP District: Plan was. approved. It is critical that the Planning Commission recommend.that the fundamental issue of rezoning for. pry 9n use at this location be the subject of. -full PUD rezoning review, not merely POD plan approval. The present application process does -not provide a full opportunity to determine -whether prison use is appropriate at this location. No one Can honestly. maintain -that the. 1988 rezoning contemplated a prison. The Commission should recommend -that such a use be reviewed in the proper manner: -by PUD district amendment. 3. Prison uses are not permitted .by the Port Junction. PUD District. The 1989 approval for this PUD district recites, as uses allowed in the district, :all uses allowed. of. right in the C-1 through C-4, and the I-1 Zones. Neither "prison," "preparole facility" nor "correctional facility" are allowed in any of. those zones under the current Zoning Ordinance. A PUD plan may not be approved for a use not allowed in the District.. - The Zoning Ordinance allows the applicant for_ PUD district rezoning -to request the specific use desired; however, no request for prison or correctional facility uses was made. The intent of the county and the Fort Junction applicant at that time -was - to, allow traditional commercial and light industrial uses. aro\99 9e\710$6.1 SEP 27 '93 15:36 303 298 0215 PAGE.004 9Z1249 inNe b..K. G. W. G. ,'A3 2% 0213 p.0p5 y7 Weld County Planning Commission September 27, 1993 Page 3 The C-1 through C-4 district use descriptions ill describe the offering of "goods and services to the public." Zoning Ordinance, incluSections 33.2; 33.3; 33.4; 33.5; 34.2. These descriptions do not de or contemplate prison uses "Prison," "preparolas or correctional facility" do not appear as allowed uses in any of the C-1 through C-4 or z-1 zones. The lists ,dg include police and fire stations, but the present application does not qualify for that category, even by analogy..' :The applicant -is a for-profit Police lia and fire offering ions are operarison ted.b to the general public. special districts,. and provide: services' to the cal ral:p blic. or From the ' perspective of `use 'compatibility, a prison resemblance to a 'police or fire 'station:': prthesop bears nd neighborhood safety aspects of the two uses could s otblic and different. Prison uses are not listed or allowed be' more particular PUD district; the applicant must first �i� this th district to obtain prisons as an allowed use 'before a the development plan is appropriate. PUD 4. Processing a PUb plan application for a use not alloyed in the underlying PUD district denies due process of lay. - Residents of the County have a right: -to rely upon the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. Amongother:things,"the Ordinance lists uses by right, accessory:uses, and the process to apply for and receive rezoning to a PUD district. PUD district rezoning, in turn, requires each PUD'district to recite th& uses allowed in that district. Uses in a PUD Plan application "must be .44Atipdj, to those located and described on the Planned Unit Development District plat." useaction 2.9. Prison ues are not even categories permitted sin the Fort Junction n district. To 'process an application to develop a non -permitted prison use in that district denies Weld County residents due process of law by ignoring the requirements of the Zoning Code established for their protection. The: proper procedure, which would provide due process, is to require an application under Section 28.15.1 to amend the district to add prisons as an allowed use, then to resubmit the current -application.: 5. The proposed prison use is incompatible With tbe.yeld County comprehensive Plan and with'the affected community. The subject property lies within the Firestone/Frederick/ Dacono Urban Growth Boundary. (Comprehensive Plan, page 32.) The CEO\99994\71056.1 :. SEP._27 •93 _ .15;.36 303 298 0215 9$71249 1 1 1 I 1 I 4: $P 27-1993 1635 ..K.C.W.G. , di 103 298 0215 P.006,007 Weld County Planning Commission September 27, 1993 Page 4 tri-area commission has unanimously recommended that the applica- tion be denied. This recommendation should be given C weight by this Commission. (Comprehensive Plan, page 34, para. ) The subject property is listed for Commercial ase in the 1-25 Mixed Use Development Area Conceptual -Land Use Plan. (Comprehensive Plan, page 46.) One policy of the 1-25 POD Area is that new development "demonstrate. compatibility with existing surrounding land use ." (Comprehensive h t page prison.) The Concerned Citizens feel strongly proposed compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. We will present detailed testimony on this point:on October 5. 6. She application does not satisfy the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. The Zoning appance sets lication ation atout Sections128.9,equi 1OO a d 28.11. complete PUD plan app The present application fails to satisfy these requirements, either in scope or detail. in many instances, the applicant has simply copied general data submitted in 19for n to PUD district nehoer mdistrict application. As we know, the 1988 application nor contemplated a prison: data from that date is of little relevance to the present prison application. d the Partiundercularly in gzoning, gt of an application for a use not p the -materials submitted are insufficient to satisfy the detail required by the Zoning Ordinance. CONCLUSION The applicant six in ) this ac iteriahas tin Section 28.1e burden of 3.1 This oof with respect and o all six (6) letter mon the presentation c°ncerned cannot Citizens on t burden: 5 will demonstrate that the applicant g 23.13.1.1: The proposal is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan. I 28.13.1.2: The PUD Plan ict a fordoesnotconform the PUD distrin which it is located (prison use not allowed). 5 28.13.1.3: The prison use applied for is not compatible with the surrounding area as demonstrated by c o\9999e\71050.1 SEP 27 '93 15:36 303 298 0215 eAGE.006 .9e:i•.i.4 J.., C. ..., iJ .x 414,.4. w. u. Weld County Planning Commission Septe:zbar 27, 1993 Page 5 tl.a County Comprehensive Plan and local planning agencies. 5 2e..3.i_S: The application does not comply with .the relevant overlay District requirement. (Section 54.3: Use. Permitted -.prison use not fermittsd in thu Fort'Jurction PCD district.) 29.13.:..C: 4 application fails to satisfy the submittal requirements for r,:proper PVD Plan. This application is of intense concern to my clients. I look forward to the hearing on October 5, when many ofthem will have the opportunity to share their concerns with you in person. Yours truly, GORSUCH, EIRGIS,.CAMPSZfl.. HALWER AND. GROWER ` cc: Concerned Citizensof Southwest Weld county Gerald 1 E." Dahl GED:no - ! veM reuaht P d ) /993 Ai ea U/'GI4A rbXJ crru.+' �'- ..2a9 .-tom 1 yfad -totAtY . 6I426 N''1 410 i�v . o — r r oc ..laruQ a m cliiza:..a,c4—L�-c� C• : c., • 4. C ry L• Aoci 1 '144'S %l ere" i O•r. CO 3031t rr•5- SCe 1 tt_ O 522 M 1 I 1 rN :Ill%•jT,j l✓'�j 11.'J¢ aT i' v+T.' T •Y ;Lrr�. li �';'ct 't- • � t . ' 25 June 93 'County Commissioners Office Attn: Ms. Constance Harbert, P. 0. Box 758 'Greeley, CO 80632 Dear Ms. Harbert: As_a resident of Southwestern Weld County I have had the opportunity to evaluate all of the issues concerning the location of a pre -parole facility in cur community. 'One of the significant issues that may have been overlooked in all of these discussions is the fact that this facility is being promoted by individuals who live outside our community. Their motivations are 'not consistent with the community as exhibited by the petitions signed by over 1,100 individuals opposing this project. 'Upon careful thought and consideration, I must state my opposition to this facility. I am aware that nine different communities along the front range have rejected similar proposals upon evaluation. I do not Ibelieve that it is in the best long term interests of the area to encourage or promote this type of development --regardless of its compatibility with the zoning regulations. This community is not prepared to serve as an experimental site to prove or disprove this Ibusiness concept. The risks associated with this effort significantly outweigh any anticipated or perceived rewards; and the financial benefit for very few individuals should not take precedence over the Iwishes of a significant majority. As our representative on the Board of Commissioners, I am asking you to represent your constituents and oppose any and all efforts to locate I this facility in unincorporated Southwest Weld County. etc pr- Chairman \ ! 7. re, !Ty ISincerely, Address: ! / 'S y_mac irnd C'6, A4 — ICity/ZIP: Telephone: %767'9 77 1 1 1 SEP 2 9 1993 isfele rActiPlamue7 LD- e4: ,oC .6acc 9C1.249 1 1 1 1 1 I 11829 WCR 15 Longmont, Co. 80504 Sept 29, 1993 Weld County Dept. of Planning Services 1400 N. 17th Ave Greeley, Co. 80631 Dear Board Members, I am prompted to write to you because of a brief paragraph I read in the Greeley paper recently. In a very small article reporting a meeting of Del Camino area residents regarding the prison which The Villa wishes to build, a Villa representative was quoted as saying that the majority of people were in favor of the prison, and that only a small but vocal minority were against it. If a person does not speak out against a lie, then he can be blamed for furthering that lie. If the above quote is accurate, then the person who spoke this has sold his personal honor and his credibility for a very small price. The statement is absurd on its face. The only people in favor of building this prison at the Del Camino site are the handful of people who expect to directly profit from it. What business owner do you know who would build his business next to a prison? Who do you know who will move to be near one? The I-25 corridor from Denver to Ft. Collins will be an area of continuing growth and development unless you kill it by allowing a facility that nobody wants to be near. If you believe that it is important that Weld County host this facility, the county is a vast area. A place is surely available where an inmate can't slip out and within 5 minutes have stolen a car from a gas station and be on his merry way. I have not met one person in this area who is even slightly unsure about the desirability of a prison in their neighborhood. Opposition is unanimous (exception: those who will profit). You will have an opportunity to chose for the welfare of the residents of Weld County, or for the welfare the The Villa Corp. Who is more important to you? R s ctf lly, ert `ry P9p nsnat F. I A, I 1 I To: Weld County Planning Commission Weld County Board of Commissioners Reference: Case # S-3444 (Prerelease Center) From: The Villa at Greeley, Inc., Applicant Date: September 30, 1993 In The Villa's application for a Planned Unit Development Plan for a prerelease center, not enough emphasis was placed on the purpose and goals of the internal operations of such a facility. It is important for the Commission to understand the operational intent of the facility in your considerationof this application. The enabling legislation, signed into law in 1990 described the purpose as follows: "The facility or program provides in -residence programs and services to instruct such inmates in obtaining and holding regular employment, in the process of enrolling in and maintaining academic courses and vocational training programs, in utilizing the resources of the community after release, in meeting their personal and family needs and responsibilities, in providing appro- priate in -residence treatment, and in participating in whatever in -residence specialized programs are available within the community in which such facility is located." When the Department of Corrections distributed a Request for Proposals for the prerelease center in January of 1992, they stated that: 'the prerelease program design will focus on programs, identifying and assessing individual needs and establishing community linkages for for continuation of treatment and related services upon release into society. . . Program structure will' include six (6) classroom hours per day, five (5) days per week, with curriculum on a twelve (12) week cycle.' Pciz49 The Villa's response to the Request for Proposals clearly emphasizes and reflects the legislative intent and the intent of the. Department of Corrections that this institution be rehabilitative in nature. In the introductory section in the Application for the P.U.D. Plan, a Program Activities Summary is outlined. Attached for your enhanced awareness of the depth of the rehabilitative nature of the program, is a complete description of each program element proposed for the prerelease center's curriculum. 1 1 Prerelease Center Program Components U 1 901249_. CHEMICAL DEPENDENCY COMPONENT The link between chemical dependence and criminal behavior has been abundantly documented. The goal of the chemical dependence component is educate, identify, and provide alternatives to the use of chemicals. ti The Chemical Dependency component consists of thirty (30) course hours as outlined below: Course Content: 1) The Disease ConceAt of Chemical Dependency, lecture, emphasizing that chemical dependency is progressive, has signs and symptoms and multifaceted effects_ A) Film "Disease Concept of. Chemical Dependency" B) Handout "Individualized Disease Chart" C) Process Group 2) personality Characteristics of The Chemically Dependent Person, lecture,shows personality characteristics and defense systems. How to change the self deceptive defense system A) Handout "Criminal Masks" B) Process Group 3) A Romance. The Story of Chemical Dependency, film, using the metaphor of a "romance" with an addicting substance will emphasis on the progression of chemical dependency. A) Handout "Twenty Questions" B) Process Group I 1 O I 4) Sociological AsoeCts of Chemical Dependency, lecture, emphasizing how the use of chemicals has affected lifestyle, personal relationships, and society. A) Handout "Am I Bargaining" B) Process Group 5) pharmacology of Drugs/Alcohol, lecture, the effects of chemica on the mind and body. Alcohol Marijuana Cocaine/Crack Stimulants (Methamphetamines) Depressants Narcotics (Heroin) Hallucinogens Inhalants A) Process Group 1 9C1249 I 6) Adult Children of Chemically Dependent Parents, lecture, emphasizes the affects of being raised in a chemically dependent family. A) Film "Children of Denial" B) Process croup 7) The "Roles" Played in the Chemically Dependent Family, lecture with emphasis on four basic roles played out in families, that in turn leads to generational family dysfunction. A) Film "Roles" B) Process Group 8) Recpverv, lecture emphasizes how present life is influenced by the past. How to take responsibility for how to live today. A) Film "The Process of Recovery" B) Process Group 9) Alcoholi n _and The Family, film, Farther Martin addresses the family system in relationship to the chemically dependent person. A) Process Group 10) Adaictigns and Parenting, lecture, addressees the role of the recovering parent, the impact on the family and positive ways to parent. A) Handout - Leaving Addiction Behind B) Process Group 11) Ma__ king Meaningful A 'ustment;s,,. lecture, addresses grief loss issues, appropriate self disclosure and making amends. A) Handout - How to Make Amends B) Process Group 12) The Twelve Step_ rogram, lecture emphasizes how these programs work in the recovery process. A) Film "Twelve Step Programs" B) Process Group 13) Step One Through Twelve, lecture reviews each step in depth with time allowed for questions. A) Process Group 14) "Sponsorship" lecture will explain the concept of the sponsor, the truths and myths. A) Process Group 9ti1249 15) Twelve by Twelve, lecture explains "what are These Principles". A) Process Group 16) Dig Book Study Group/Alcoholics Anonymous/yarcoties Anonymous meetings each night. 94:1249 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 EMPLOYMENT The focus on, the Pre -Release Center's Employment Component is on practical, individualized job preparedness and job placement services. The Employment Component consists of thirty-six (36) classroom hours. Course Content 1. Assessment of previous experience and interests. A. Lecture B. Individual Feedback and Discussion 2. Administration of t e General Aptitude Test Battery (CATS). A. Lecture B. Follow up on interpretation of results. 3. Resume Writing. A. Lecture a. How to explain time"gaps in your resume b. How to explain your present correctional status c. How to emphasize your abilities and motivations B. Development of a Resume On a individualized basis, each offender will be assisted in the development and completion of a resume. The finalized product will be used in their job seeking efforts. 4. Job seeking Tpchnicues.. A. Lecture a. Job seeking by phone b. Planning each day's activities in advance c. How to get an interview d. Staying motivated e. Documenting your efforts 5. Interviewing Techniaue,"z. A. Lecture a. Proper attire and hygiene b. Being prompt and attentive c. Being prepared and knowledgeable of job d. Asking appropriate questions 9::;:1249 . e. Responding to difficult questions f. How to close the interview on a positive note B. Mock Interviews a. Videotape individual mock interviews b. Playback for group discussion of interviewee's strengths, weaknesses, and improvement areas. 6. Job Seeking Skills A. Lecture "The Basics" -- honesty, punctuality, attendance, good work habits. B. Movie/discussion C. Lecture --how to deal with a difficult boss; getting along with co-workers; staying out of office gossip; the politics of promotions. 7. Tndividualized Job Seeking and Verification of Employment A. Phone banking for fob leads. B. Review of want ads for job leads C. Making use of Job Services' microfiche and job leads. D. Sending cover letter and resume to prospective employers. E. Staff verification of employment, to accompany offender's file upon release. 1 1 1 1 i I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I EDUCATION COMPONENT Basic literacy is an important factor related to each offender's prognosis for a successful adjustment to society. During each offender's Admission Assessment, the literacy level will be determined. If basic reading and writing skills are lacking, the offender will be involved in the program's Education Component. The Education Component consists of two (2) 90 minute sessions per week, throughout the twelve week cycle, for a total of thirty-six (36) hours of course content. Course Content: 1) fi sic Literacy Training is provided, primarily on a one-on-one basis, by trained volunteer tutors under the supervision of program staff. The volunteers are recruited from the Weld County Right to Read Program. 2) Adult Basic Education (A.B.E.) and G.E.D. instruction is provided on a contractual basis through Aims Community College. 3) Academic Advisors from Aims Community College and the University of Northern Colorado will provide instruction and direction for those offenders who wish to continue their vocational or academic endeavors upon completion of the program. 4) Active Referrals are facilitated in order that discharging offenders may continue their education in the community in which they are released. Educational Assessme Instruments: In order to properly place each offender at the appropriate level in the educational program, the following are examples of the assessment instruments to be utilized; - Test of Adult Base Education (TABE) - General Educational Development Test Battery - Wide Range Achievement Test (WRAT) 9..1249, RELAPSE PREVENTION The Relapse Prevention Component consists of thirty-six (36) contact hours. Course_ Content: 1) The Bio-Psycho- pcial Model of Addictive Disease, film, describes the toxic effects of alcohol and drugs and the long-term consequences. Methods of managing these symptoms are presented. A) Handouts - What Was Your Consequence B) Process Group 2) The Development Model of Recovery, film, shows a practical guide to recovery, addresses the major task to a total program of recovery. A) Handouts - List of Major Tasks B) Process Group 3) The Rel,psQ Prornct, film, addresses the signs of relapse long before a person ever begins using drugs or alcohol. A) Handouts - Principles of Managing B) Process Group 4) process of Relapse 7, lecture, addresses awareness of own attitudes, identifyingwhen attitudes begin to change. A) Handouts - Warning sign list B) Process Group 5) process' Relapse II, lecture, addresses Recovery, PAW (Past Acute Withdrawal) and relapse syndrome. 6) Relapse Progressipa, lecture, addresses the change external and/or internal, social structure break- down and acute degeneration. A) Handouts - Inventory B) Process Group 7) St ps of Relag Preyeritio,D_pi, nine, lecture, addresses warning sign identification, warning sign management and inventory training. A) Handouts - Inventory B) Process Group 8) Row to Sabotage Your Treatment, film, address how 931249 1 1 1 1 1 e 1 1 1 1 1 '. former clients undermined their own treatment. Lecture A) Handouts - Roles chemically dependent people play B) Process Group 9) Types of Regovery ?, lecture, addresses that addictive disease can be controlled through not using chemicals and that it can never be cured. Helps break the "denial" stage- A) Handouts - Pros and Cons B) Process Group 10) Types of Recovery fl, lecture, addresses coping styles, gaining control and balanced living_ values and sober activities. A) Handouts Positive Motivation B) Process Group 11) Types of Rgcovery III, lecture, addresses productive living, "Is this all there is" normal life can be dull, the chemically dependent person is a risk taker and needs to change the immediate gratification process. A) Handouts - Where Will I Be B) Process Group 12) Cross Addiction, lecture, emphasis on cross tolerance, changing one addictive substance for another. Caffeine and nicotine will also be addressed. A) Handouts - List of chemicals B) Process Group 13) Commulsiyg Rehavtpr\, lecture, addresses eight behaviors that interfere with the recovery process. Noncompulsive behaviors that help avoid relapse. A) Handouts - List of Behaviors B) Process Group 14) The Family and Relapse, lecture, addresses the roles, both positive and negative that families can play in the addictive life. Unrealistic expectations are examined. A) Handouts - Family Roles B) Process Group 9;1249 15) Staving sift an— — Szkez, lecture, addresses spiritual aspects and self help groups in recovery. A) Handouts - Directory of Support.Groups B) Process Group 16) Actlythises,lecture, addresses positive outlets to replace risk taking behaviors. Doing all the things you had never taken time to do and new ideas for a complete recovery. A) Handouts - Activities List B) Process Group 17) lecture, how to plan the day and week to obtain good time management skills. A) Handouts - Weekly Planning Guide B) Process Group 18) Plan Your Own Helaine, lecture, instruction on how to identify "Your Own" danger signs. Structured Plan on how to prevent relapse. A) Handouts - Plan Your Own Relapse B) Process Group I I I I 1 I I i I. 90124$ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 i 1 1 COGNITIVE RESTRUCTURING A focused approach to change irrational thoughts about life. It is not the events in a person's life, it is the perception of the event. Techniques used can expect to have an impact on the offender's thinking. The Ross Model will be used. The Cognitive Restructuring component consists of seventy (70) hours outlined below. Course Content= 1) Introduction/Problem Solving, Recognition. 2) Problem-Golvira 2, Identification, Think Lab or Quickie. 3) problem -Solving a, 4) problem -Solving 4, 5) problem Solving 5, 6) problem -Solving 6, 7) 8) Gathering Information. Conceptualizing. Nonverbal Communication. Verbal Communication. problem -Solving 7, Alternative Thinking. Consequential Thinking. 9) Q; eativQ_Jhinkiitg (CaE1/Valyes Enhancement 8, Dilemma Game. 10) Problem -Solving 9, Assertive Communication. 11) Creative Thinking 3 (Ru1es1/Praetice Assertive Communication. 12) Scruples. 13) Social Skills 11, Asking for Help, Think Lab. 14) Social Skills. Expressing a Complaint. 15) creative Thinking (AGOJ /values Enhancement i, Mercy Death. 16) Management of Emotions., Schedule 15 minutes every remaining session for Ange: Diary. 17) Sstsial Skills 12, Persuading Others, Cognitive Exercise, Problem Pool. 1 9C1249 18) Creative Thinking 6, Planning/values 19) 20) Creative thinking 7 (Flpl/Cognitive Exercise, Scruples. 21) Social. Sills 15, Responding to the Feelings of Others. 22) Creative Thinking 8, (APC)/Value 5, Mrs.. Bartholomew. 23) ,4ocrial_Skills 18. Responding to Persuasion. 24) Creative Thinking, Decisions/Practice, Negotiation and Assertiveness. 25) Social Skills 19. Responding to Failure, Cognitive Exercise, Psychologizes.. 26) Values 3,, Robbery/Creative Thinking 10, (DPV) 27) Social Skills 20, Responding to Contradictory Messages. 28) Skills in Review/Grab Bag. 29) Critical Reasoning 1, 30) Critical Reasoning 2, Advertising and Schemes. 31) Negotiation Skills. Pictionary. 2, Nurse. Propaganda and Persuasion. 32) Social Skills 21. Responding. to Complaints. 33) Critical Reas9ning 3, Basic Concepts. 34) Cognitive Exercises, Practice Grab -Bag or Problem Pool. 35) rritijai Reasoning 4, Learning to be Open -Minded. 1 9u1249 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 THE CORRECTIONS SYSTEM - TAKING RESPONSIBILITY Frequently ignored in correctional programming,this component deals with the individual criminogenic factors leading to offenders' involvement in the criminal justice system. It also focuses upon practical considerations leading to a successful progression through the system. The Corrections System component consists of twenty (20) to twenty-four (24) course hours. Course: 1) "Responsibility and Change". This three part segment first focuses on general responsibility issues regarding factors leading to arrest/conviction/correctional supervision. The focus then narrows to explore the specific criminogenic factors related to each offender's ultimate incarceration. Emphasis is then placed upon what has to change in order to avoid future involvement with the system. 2) prpspt Correctional Status. Some inmates are extremely knowledgeable of Colorado Statutes and Department of Corrections Regulations. Most are not, and rely upon often erroneous information provided by fellow inmates regarding their status in the system. This segment focuses on providing accuratelegal and regulatory information to the offenders. It also will define each offender's status in the system, such as: - Time Computation Earned Time Parole Plan/Community Referral Status Length of Parole - Length of incarceration, if parole is revoked - Disciplinary action, consequences 3) F �artationsJ As_rn_le/T_$_P./COmmt jty CO Lions. This segment focuses on the specific rules, regulations, and expectations of correctional supervision in a community based setting. Guest speakers from parole, I.S.P., and Community Corrections will conduct this segment. 4) Mock Parol Jiearinas. This segment is directed toward offenders who have not yet seen the Parole Board, who had their parole deferred, are who are facing rescission hearings. Staff with whom the offender is unfamiliar will act as parole board members, and will conduct mock parole hearings. The sessions will be videotaped for replay and critique purposes. The emphasis of this segment is on preparation, presentability, sincerity,'and appropriate and truthful responses in parole hearings. 901249 INTERPERSONAL SKILLS COMPONENT, I. IntexpgragnaLaillaSamasnent The Interpersonal Skills Component promotes appropriate assertiveness, flexibility, social skills development, and proper communicaiton techniques. This component consists of thirty (30) contact hours. Course Content 1) Asserti enesz, lecture, emphasizes the need to be assertive, definitions of non-assertive behavior, aggressive and assertive behavior. A) Handout, "Assertiveness Sentence Completion" B) Process Group 2) A Bill of Assertive Rights, lecture, review of the ten rights, which are. our prime assertive human rights. A) Handout B) Process Group 3) "Broken Record", lecture, reviews the technique of being persistent and the workable compromise. A) Handout, homework assignment and results B) Process Group 4) Review of homework assignment "Broken Record" Free Information and Self -Disclosure, lecture, reviews conversation and communication skills. A) Handout, homework assignment B) Process Group 5) Review of homework assignment and results. The Systematic Skill of Fogging, lecture, focuses on how to assertively accept criticism and the techniques used in Fogging. A) Handout, homework assignment B) Process Group 6) Review of homework assignment and results. Negative Asia tion, lecture, focuses on coping with compliments and/or criticism. Asserting your negative points, being responsible. 1 1 1 1 11 1 I 1 A) Handout, homework assignment B) Process Group 7) Review of homework assignment and results. Negative inquiry, lecture, focus on how to inquire about yourself and what you do. Prompting criticism about work performance, can lead to a promotion, prompting criticism about yourself can lead to a better, clearer understanding in relationships. A) Handout, homework assignment B) Process Group 8) Review of homework assignments and results. Techniques of Being Assertive, lecture, re- examination of skills, how they work, situations to use techniques in, role play different situations. 9) Close Equal Relationships, lecture, how being assertive works in fear, anger, and sex, review The Anxiety Model, The Anger Model and The Mixed Model. A) Process Group II. Communication Skills course Content 1) CommunicationSkills Part ?, lecture, details the importance of healthy communication. Definition of communication, types and forms. A) Handout B) Process Group 2) Communication Skills Part Sl, lecture, details transmission of emotions, attitudes, ideas and acts from one person to another. A) Handout B) Process Group 3) Negotiation. How to Reioaye Conflicts with Pgople, lecture, details solutions as compromises to "the" problem. A) Handout B) Process Group 4) polluting Communication, lecture, details the effects of hidden agendas, (i.e. undisclosed 9ti i: }g.. personal feelings, attitudes and goals) on interpersonal communication. A) Film "Feelings" B) Handout C) Process Group 5) Communication Model, lecture, details the three types of communication, barriers, and the five levels of communication. A) Handout B) Process Group 6) Meeting Your Needs_Thrcugh Communication, lecture, details styles of communication that work efficiently and inefficiently, active listening, eye contact and body language. A) Handout B) Process Group I I 9012491 1 1 1 1. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 FAMILY RELATIONSHIPS The most beneficial and -long-lasting changes occur as a result of education and self-discovery. The Family Component consists of thirty (30) course hours as outlined below: Course Content: 1) Early Childhood I, lectures, addresses parent -child bonding and the ability to do a self examination of own childhood and children currently involved with. A) Process Group 2) Early Childhood II, lecture, addresses the unbonded child and difficulties experienced from adolescence into adult lives. A) Process Group 3) Early Childhood III lecture, addresses ability to recognize what we need, what we needed as children and what our children need. - A) Process Group 4) The Family in Crisis, film,' overview of what constitutes a family in crisis, lecture. A) Process Group, handout 5) The Healthy P mil ilv, film, overview of a healthy family, lecture. A) Process Group, handout 6) The Unhea y Family, film, overview of the dysfunctional family, lecture. A) Process Group, handout 7) The Cpmpuls ve Fa ilv, film, overview of compulsive behavior, the CORE of all addictions, lecture A) Process Group, handout 8) The Persecuted, film, overview of the co-dependent family, lecture A) Process Group, handout 9) The Most Common Familv_Il1ness; Co -Dependency, film, overview of mistaken belief system, lecture. A) Process Group, handouts 10) The Family, film, overview of dealing with resentments, learning forgiveness, lecture. A) Process Group 11) Health for the Family, film, overview of unfinished childhood issues, and the healing process, lecture. A) Process Group, handout 12) Hope for thQ_Fanily, film, overview of the functioning family dynamics, lecture. A) Process Group, handout *Videotapes are from John Bradshaw's series on the Family 13) 'dying Beyond She Dysfunctional Family, lecture, focuses on responsibility, awareness,, choices and self esteem. A) Process Group 14) System Dynamics of the Chemically Dependent Family, lecture, focus on roles motivating feelings, pay off and possible price for all family members. A) Process Group, handout 15) When Heloina Hurts, film, overview of signs of enabling, double messages, enabling vs. helping, learning to change, lecture. A) Process Group I 904249 11 I 1 I I 1 HEALTH AND WELLNESS COMPONENT This component deals with the awareness of practical health considerations, physical and psychological well- being, guidelines for self -care, and prevention of disease. The Health and Wellness Component consists of twenty- four (24) course hours as outlined below, and will be co - facilitated by the Greeley Pre -Release Center's nursing staff. Course Content: I. Nutrition 1) Foods That Feed Mood Swings, lecture, focus on how different foods either increase or decrease the way you feel. A) Handouts B) Process Group 2) Nutrition in Action, lecture, addresses questions in determining nutritional status, talking nutrition basics, estimating caloric needs. A) Handouts (Facts and Fallacies of Health. Foods) B) Process Group 3) Nutrients, lecture, addresses questions in determining a proper guide to proteins, fats, carbohydrates, vitamins, minerals, and their association to the body's daily needs. A) Handouts (Food Fallacies and Facts) B) Process Group 4) Hypoglycemia. Hyperglycemia, lecture, addresses low and high blood sugar levels, causes and effects. A) Handouts B) Process Group 5) vitamins and Minerals., lecture, addresses a complete and easy guide to what is put: -into the body, the four food groups and the value of eating right. A) Handouts B) Process Group 6) Nicotine and Caffeine, lecture, addresses the addictive qualities of these -drugs and the effects on the system and psych. 9'42:19 I I A) Handouts B) Process Group II. Wn elless an Self Care 1) Mich Level Wellness --How-to Maintain, lecture, addresses the five dimensions of wellness from self responsibility.to physical: fitness.to issues. A) Handouts B) Process Group 2) The Truth About Exercise, lecture, addresses the fundamentals of physical fitness, cardiovascular endurance, joint flexibility, body leanness muscular strength. A) Handouts (Dynamics of Nutrition with Exercise) B) Process Group 3) Minimizing Aches and Pains, -lecture, addresses questions in determining everyday concerns that can occur within the daily exercise routine. General muscle pulls, trains, soreness and bruises, blisters, foot strains, etc. General prevention and care. A) Handouts (Guidelines for Stretching) B) Process Group III. $TLV-III to AIDS 1) The Realities of Aids, lecture, information on AIDS, ARC and symptomatic HTLV-III infection.. The Myths, The Realities. A) Handouts B) Process,Group 2) A.I.n.S. - A Had wav to Die, film made by inmates for inmates dying of AIDS. A) Handouts B) Process Group_ 3) The Transmission of HTLV-III, lecture, addresses how the infection is spread, antibody testing, counseling, follow-up. A) Handouts B) Process Group I I. I I I I I i I I 1 I I I 1 4) Prevention of ATOS, lecture, addresses the recommendations for prevention. Safe sex, cleaning needles_ A) Handouts B) Process Croup 5) mom, lecture, reviews the previous lectures, addresses community resources and recommended readings. A) Handouts B) Process Group 1 I I I 1 I 1 1 I I MONEY MANAGEMENT The ability to manage money and planning for future financial needs is an important and essential life skill. The Money Management Component consists oftwelve (12) course hours as outlined below. Course Content: 1) personal Tnfjv A, lecture, how to establish a budget, addresses housing, food, savings, restitution, etc. Deals with practical considerations such as hooking up phone, electricity, gas, and other utilities. A) Handout B) Group Discussion 2) Openina a Checking Account, lecture, details using actual forms; what kind of account, deposit slips, balancing the account. A) Handout B) Group Discussion 3) Savings Account, lecture, details information on types of savings accounts, interest rates; using a Bank versus a Credit Union or Savings and Loan. A) Handout B) Group Discussion 4) Obtaining Credit, lecture, eilstht importance tnof charge establishing credit, e.g., accounts, cards, car loans. Credit Bureaus: how they can help or hurt. A) Handout B) Group Discussion 5) insurance, lecture, explains the different types of insurance, health, car, personal property, etc. A) Handout B) Group Discussion 6) Community Resourc9s, lecture, explains agencies available, such as Social Security, veteran's benefits, educational assistance, vocational Rehabilitation, etc. 1,A v i 1 1 ,. 1 1 1 1 r 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ANGER MANAG DI 104 Poorly managed anger is clearlya risk factor in the management of offenders. Anger is one of the most damaging of all human emotions. Offenders shall learn to deal effectively with differing emotions. The Anger Management Component consists of thirty (30) course hours as outlined below: Course Content: 1. , lecture, addresses anger as a normal, healthy emotion. Anger can be expressed appropriately without violence and aggression. A. Handout - Definition of Healthy/Unhealthy Anger B. Process Group 2. ,Shapes ancLColors of...Anger, lecture, addresses eight emotions anger can cover up. A. Handout - Eight Emotions B. Process Group 3. RZT (Rational -Emotional Therapy), lecture, addresses seeking solutions and dealing with problems in a realistic manner.. A. Handout - Basic Principles of'RET B. Process Group 4. Using RET, Methods, lecture, explores the technique, A: Activating Event; B:' Belief System; and C: Consequences. Using A, B, C, will help the offender deal in a more appropriate manner. A. Handout - A., B, C. B. Process Group - Role play 5. peliet System. lecture,"explores rational and irrational beliefs and how to amend these beliefs. "A" (Activating Experiences), "c"`(Consequences) is examined. A. Handout- Four irrational statements B. Process Group 6. How Y Make Myself Angry, lecture, addresses "Jr (Disrupting) how to detect your own irrational beliefs. Where these beliefs` -come from`and`:how to take responsibility for changing. 9.1249 A. Handout - Identifying your `Buttons" B. Process Group 7. Cognitive sffect, lecture, addresses how I think, is how I.feel and how I -act. The ability to take self - responsibility and the willingness to practice to make positive change. A. Handout - Take Action Worksheet B. Process Group 8. The Physiological Cost of Anger, lecture addresses high blood pressure, Type A personality and heart ' attack. A. Handout - Techniques to reduce tension/anger B. Process Group - Relaxation Procedures 9. Tnfnrpersonal Cost of Ancefi, lecture, explores three types of anger; stuffing, escalating and directing. How to work the anger out, setting self limits. A. Handout - Your Anger Style B. Process Group 10. $tress_Anger Journal Writing, lecture, instruction on how to keep a daily journal, focus on stress feelings. A. Handout - Feelings List' B. Process Group, 11. Meeting your Needs, lecture, addresses identification of needs, assessmentof life style and options to get needs met. A. Handout --Where Will I -Be? B. Process Group 12. $plf-Fstenm Building, 'ecture,-.describes the characteristics of people with high self-esteem. Building self-esteem., A. Handout.',About About Me B. Process Group 13. toraive and Forget,. lecture,. addresses how anger must be experienced, dissipated and ended for forgiving and forgetting to take place. A._ Handout Just/Unjust Anger B. Process Group,, I I I I I 1 i I 1 9012491 i 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I i i I I i 14. Anger Uetween Parent and Child, lecture, guides the offender through the anger their child has experienced due to the parent's incarceration. Validation of the child's anger and how to help the child and the relationship grow. A. Role -Play B. Process Group 15. Anger and the Significant other, lecture, gives information of listening skills,, power struggles, win -win communication. A. Role -Play B. Process Group 9_,1249 LEISURE TIME ACTIVITIES More than just playing ball or lifting weights, the Pre -Release Center's Leisure Time Activities program provides educational and didactic activities directed by a staff member specifically trained in the field. Goals of the program include the development of cooperation, trust, positive competitive attitudes, and productive leisure time activities. It is anticipated that graduate students in the Health, Physical Education and Recreation Department of the University of Northern Colorado would assist with this component. The Recreational Therapy course is conducted for one hour, five days a week, for a total of sixty (60) contact hours in the twelve week cycle. Course Content: 1. Litetime Activities. Lecture. Encourages on -going participation in activities, the development of hobbies, and productive use of one's leisure time. 2. Volunteerism. Movie provided by United Way. Lecture emphasizing positive self worth being developed by volunteering in worthy community activities. 3. Gardening. This hands-on segment encourages patience, orderliness, and visible results from planting vegetables, flowers, trees and shrubs. Handouts from the Weld County Extension Service instruct individuals in proper horticultural practices. Guest speakers will also provide information on a variety of related topics. 4. The Public T.i hracy as a T,Qi 4ure Ti ip gesour_c',4. This segment instructs offenders on relevant information available for free at public libraries. A. Handouts B. Lecture S. Sports Strategy. Emphasizes team work, rules and techniques of various sports such as basketball, volleyball, handball, softball, etc. Series of lectures and hands-on training. 6. Weightlifting Clinic. This staff supervised segment teaches offenders proper techniques of power lifting, toning, body building, posing, prevention of muscle shortening, etc. 7. Board Game Strategies. Teaches rules, techniques, and intricacies of various board games such as chess, checkers, dominoes, recreational card playing, etc. I I I� I I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I 1 1 1 I 8. Movie Series. This segment provides an instructive and entertaining film series on topics ranging from archery, fishing, hunting, hiking, automobile restoration, etc. 9. Introduction to Hobby Crafts. Provides information and basic instruction on hobby craft activities such as leather work, mirror etching, model building, cross-stitch, knitting, etc 9;1249 DOMESTIC VIOLENCE COMPO Domestic violence is the, leading cause of injury for women in the United States. Domestic violence is a crime and is, against the lawti The Domestic Violence consists of twenty-four (24) hours outlined below. Course Content - 1. Definitions. E cts. Myths of Domestic Violence, lecture, addresses terms used in domestic violence situations, reinforces the facts and dispels the myths. A. Handout "Biederman's Chart of Coercion" B. Process Group 2. Domestic Violence and 1e Law in Colorado, lecture, addresses the Colorado law and reporting requirements. Murder in the First Degree to Menacing to Sexual Assault in the Third Degree. A. Question and Answer Session with an outside expert B. Process Group 3. , lecture, addresses the characteristics of those involved in domestic violence. A. Process Group 4. "The Burning Bed", a film, lecture addresses the violence, affection and gifts, the isolation, the crisis and chaos. A. Process Group 5. Why do Women Stay in a Battering Re a_tionship? lecture, addresses the dynamics of the relationship. The woman's childhood, economic dependence, fear and beliefs about the batterer. A. Handout "How I See My Relationship" B. Process Group 6. Men Who Batter, lecture, addresses the theory that I male violence is learned behavior and can be modified and changed. Unresolved feelings, his , childhood and belief about women is discussed. 9zi249.1;. eh 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 A. Handout - AMEND, (Abusive Men Exploring New Directions) B. Process Group 7. The cycle of violence, lecture; addresses Phase I increased tension, Phase II, the battering, Phase " III, the calm. A. Handout - Power and Control Wheel B. Process Group 8. "Family Affair", film, addresses family of origin, violence, victim nd batterers beliefs. A. Process Group 9. Children and Domestic,, lecture, addresses the emotional and behavioral behavior of children who witness domestic violence. A. Process Group 10. When Woman is the Batterer, lecture, addresses woman as the perpetrator. A. Process Group 11. Strategies to Prevent Stress juild-up, lecture, addresses positive responses to stress. A. Role Play 12. Resources, lecture, addresses treatment, individual, group and couples. A. Handout - Resource list for Colorado 9Z:12-19 CPR AND FIRST AID This component will result in the certification of offenders in CardioPulmonary Resuscitation and basic First Aid techniques, as recognized by the American Heart Association and the American Red Cross.. The coursesare taught by certified instructors,, and each segment consists of eight (8) contact hours, for a total of sixteen (16) program hours. BLOOD DONOR PROGRAM On a voluntary basis, clients will be given credit for two (2) contact hours for donating blood. The American Red Cross will provide the staff and supplies, and will draw blood in the facility at scheduled intervals. 1 SPECIAL NEEDS OFFENDER COMPONENT The Prerelease Center emphasizes the assessment -of individual needs, and the development of a practical and appropriate curriculum based upon individual capabilities. The facility anticipates that approximately 15% of offenders referred to the program will present needs that will require specialized services beyond the mainstream prerelease programming. Examples of these special needs include offenders who:. lack the basic academic or cognitive ability required to actively participate. do not speak English_ have significant, yet manageable physical or mental health limitations. are unable to confirm adequate release plans, especially in the areas of housing and/or appropriate community linkage follow-through. The Special Needs Offender (S.M.O.) Component consists of a one and one-half (1-1/2) hour class period each day. The S.N.O. class provides enhanced individualized and concentrated instruction in areas such as: remedial writing, reading, and arithmetic skills. English as a Second Language. functional mental health counseling. accommodation for physical limitations such as ambulation problems, chronic medication needs, and services required by previous and anticipated medical services procedures. specific, enhanced programming and referral procedures for those offenders whose release plan has deteriorated and who, without specialized attention, would be released without essential requirements such as adequate housing, public assistance, community referral or employment opportunities. The principals of The Villa at -Greeley, Inc. have discussed the need for enhanced Special: Needs Offender programming with the Colorado Department of Public Safety, Division of Criminal Justice (D.C.J.). A.C.J. is supportive of assisting in the development of such enhanced services by cooperating with D.O.C. and the prerelease facility by earmarking a specific number of community, correctional beds funded by their agency in halfway houses across the state, to be utilized by offenders being released from the facility. In this way, beyond the enhanced services provided by the prerelease program, a continuum of services into the community would be better ensured through the effective use of local, established residential facilities that could provide the services and supervision required for this population. 9.u1Z49 INDIVIDUAL RELEASE PLANNING. COMPONENT This essential component sets aside three hours of -one to -one contact with an assigned counselor in the last week of each offender's placement in the program. The purpose of the Individual Release Planning component. is to ensure that each offender's release plan is firmly established in the following areas: 1. Housing - must be verified 2. Employment/Job Seeking status — verified 3. Continued correctional supervision- contact made with receiving agency 4. Referrals and appointments to specific community resources in the community in which they are being released: A. Chemical Dependency B. Mental Health C. Social Services D. Vocational Rehabilitation E. Specific support groups and individualized counseling, etc. 5. A Discharge Summary will be forwarded to the receiving correctional agency within (3) days of each offender's release. The Discharge Summary outlines:. A. B. C. D. E. F. G. Admission Status Results of Educational/Vocational/Chemical Dependency Assessments Specific program involvement Attitudes, progress -and problems Disciplinary issues Residence and. employment upon release Specific referrals -and continuing program plan following release._ 932.9 , I- I 1 1 1 To: Weld County Planning Commission Weld County Board of Commissioners Reference: Case # 344, A Site Specific Development Plan and A P.U.D. Plan (Ft. Junction, First Filing) From: The Villa at Greeley, Inc., Applicant Date: September 30, 1993 0 Weld Cal Planning The following are illustrative, specific examples showing how the development of correctional facilities effects: - Compatability with adjacent land uses - Development of commercial, industrial, and residential land .uses on adjacent properties - Land values of adjacent properties, and - Community safety issues. 1. Larimer County Detention Center. The Larimer County Detention Center is located in Ft. Collins, on Prospect Road, approximately one mile West of Interstate 25. The facility was built in 1983. This facility holds 273 inmates including approximately 35 State Department of Corrections inmates, as well as prisoners awaiting trial on all types of criminal charges having occurred in Larimer County. This detention center is approximately 120,000 square feet, and employs 110 staff on an around the clock basis. Subsequent to the Larimer County Detention Center being built, considerable development has occurred on immediately adjacent properties. A brochure is attached,describing the Prospect East Commercial/Industrial Park. The large building shown on the left hand side of the development map shown on the brochure, surrounded by development, is the Larimer County Detention Center. As shown on the map, approximately 400,000 square feet of commercial/industrial development has occurred after the detention facility was constructed. Prospect East is 100% occupied, and the value of the property continues to rise. According to the developer, there have been no safety or •image" concerns resulting from the detention facility. In fact, one of Prospect East's selling points is the free, built in security system provided by the traffic generated by law enforcement and security staff. Included in the Prospect East Business Park is a child day care 9a1249 center,. which is immediately adjacent to the detention facility, and the District Offices of the Girl Scouts of America. 2. Mich lains Detention Center. The High Plains Detention Center is located in Brush, Colorado, on the North frontage road of I-76. High Plains is a 157 bed juvenile detention facility, which serves juveniles from across the nation, primarily juveniles who have been determined to be unmanageable in their local facilities. Members of the High Plains Advisory Board, which consists of community members who oversee the operations of the facility, and serve 'as community liaisons, state that the facility is a successful, non -intrusive land use in their community. Adjacent to the High Plains Detention Center is Mohrlang Manufacturing, and the Brush School District Offices, neither of whom have any concerns regarding this facility. 3. The Federal Correctional Institution (FCI), Florence, CO The Federal Government has just completed a 2700 inmate correctional complex, ranging from Minimum to Super -Maximum security. The complex is located just South of Florence. Immediately adjacent to this complex, a new motel was just constructed. The billboard in front of the Motel states "Welcome FCI Visitors". Land values have increased in the area, resultant from projects such as Bear Paw, which is a new development for a planned residential retirement and golf course community. 'sear Paw is located one-half mile North of the Federal Correctional Institution. 4. $oulder County -Jail.. The Boulder County Jail is located in the Northeast quadrant of the City of Boulder. It is a- 103,400 square foot facility housing 357 inmates, built in 1988, and has- 109 staff. Since the construction of:the jail, the-Lake:Center Industrial Park has developed, including two projects just being -completed: Synergen, and Particle Measurements, -each of which are approximately 40,000 square feet. Two blocks West of the Boulder County Jail is Noble Park, a medium density residential development of 140 single family homes. The Noble Park development began at approximately the same time the Boulder -County Jail was being' constructed, and is now in its final phase' of home constructi=on. The developer of Noble Park -states that the County Jail' has not -'deterred nor detracted from this development. In -1988y -the median -price of homes'in Noble Park 'was. $150,000. The median- price' -in this 'development:is now :$230,000. . 9x,1249 « aaw 6, 5 t? Ne 22 :a. f Ja'Q 97 +�\ Amenities The scenic Fort Collins Poudre River bike and jogging trail winds through the Prospect East site. This pathway follows the river through cool cottonwood groves to Downtown Fort Collins. Lakes and ponds also surround the Park and decorative fountains add elegance to the generously landscaped grounds. Excellent parking, lots of open space and strict architectural and 046 signage covenants are also Q0y included in the master plan. Pg.c? lo Denver 90 minutes .°; „F,lexSpace 'Much.of Prospect Park. East is built around the concept of.Flex$pace..FlexSpace allows startup or growth - oriented companies to lease only as much space as needed. It also allows established businesses a large degreeof influenceover the kind and quantity of space they lease -whether it's for offices, warehousing, or research and development. -`a D • Corporate: Headquarters Prospect East ishome to corporate headquarters of two of the most rapidly growingand successful companies in Fort Collins. Advanced Energy is the world's leading manufacturer Of process power supplies for the thin film industry. VipontPharmaceuticals is a leader in the oral hygiene fieltl: BothAdvanced Energy and Vipont have benefited from the investment in their success by the W.W. Reynolds Companies. ' INCE 4� Gyy p CENT v ONE R� \• rL e=.: .no tn•• 29 0 • 11M TIT e L■ o iRIVER.CENTER e e 'tea* es- vs—+• Transportation In Prospect. Park East is conveniently located near the hub of Fort Collins. Adjacent to Interstate 25: it affords easy access to either Denver or Cheyenne within an I hour. Rail lines and the Fort Collins Downtown Airport are also nearby. =.v radeirf,•etretee%•.naZ.as'cSt:OCPO Committed to Success At W.W. Reynolds, we have committed ourselves to the suet's* of the companies located at Prospect Park East. Let usbecommittedt0yours as weltJoin us in the most supportive business atmosphere available. Anywhere. • �`r•• r' I ow. • • �. wi Advanced Energy V/pont Pharmaceuticals THE WI•'i C..n, ' • 1919 14th Street. Suite 802 P.O. Box 1666 Boulder. Colorado 80306 (303) 4424687 With a commanding view of the Rockies. Prospect Park Eastoffers a wide variety of amenities as well as an exciting atmosphere of growth and success. "Prospect Park East offers an aesthetic, well - maintained and progressive location for industrial occupants at any phase of their growth,. Advanced Energy is delighted to be associated with the W.W. Reynolds Company and is proud to be a leader in Prospect East's continuing development" 'After more than a year of planning and activity, Vipont Pharmaceutical's dream of a new corporate headquarters has become a reality. Our new location at Prospect Park East fulfills our physical needs while providing a comfortable, aesthetically pleasant working I environment. In July, 1988, groundbreaking for another building was begun, the second within two years." -I 3212 1* 1 1 I 1 1 To: Weld County Planning Commission Weld County Board of Commissioners From: Michael Brand, Corrections Director The Villa at Greeley, Inc. Date: October 4, 1993 RE: Ft. Junction PUD First Filing/Final Plan The purpose of this letter is to succinctly outline The Villa at Greeley, Inc.'s full compliance with all applicable requirements and conditions established in the Weld County Comprehensive Plan and by Weld County Zoning Ordinance. Section 28.13.1 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance states that "The Planning Commission shall recommend approval of the request of the Planned Unit Development Plan unless it finds that the applicant has not met one or more of the applicable requirements or conditions of section 28.9, 28.11.1. and 28.13. " The zoning ordinance goes on state that the applicant has the burden of proof to show that the above standards and conditions are met. Compliance with 28:9 requirements are outlined in the application section "P.U.D. Procedural Guide Application Requirements", numbers 1 through 29, as described in zoning ordinance and Weld County Department' of Planning Services' expectations. Supporting- attachments follow. All required architectural and engineers' maps and drawings required under Section 28.11`8re complete, and are 'submitted as part of the application. There are no utility or infrastructure concerns related to this application. 901249 In addition to the information included in the PUD Development Plan, the following further demonstrates the applicant's compliance with requirements as outlined under section 28.13 of the Weld County Zoning Regulations: 28.13.1.1 "That the proposal is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan." In regard to the 1-25 mixed use development area, the Weld County Comprehensive Plan states that "the district allows residential, commercial, and institutional uses to occur after they have been reviewed and approved according to the.P.U.D. application process. The P.U.D. process is an approach which promotes freedom, flexibility, and creativity." In the absence of definition of the term "institutional" as permitted use in this M.U.D. area, a dictionary definition is relied upon. According to Random House College Dictionary, institution is defined as "3. a place of confinement, as a prison, mental hospital, etc." Webster's defines ,institutionalism as "2. public institutional care of defective/ delinquent, or dependent persons." Webster's defines delinauent.as_ "1. offending by violation of duty or law." The applicant asserts that the proposed land usage, a preparole _release facility, _is defined as an institution, and is therefore an allowable use in the I-25 Mixed Use Development Area, as described in the Weld County_Comprehensive Plan.._ 28.13.1.2 "That the Planned Unit Development Plan -conforms to the local PUD District in which it is proposed to be located." 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 The existing PUD district is current and approved for commercial/industrial land use as follows: I-1, 10 acres, 215,000 square feet. C-1 through C-4, 22 acres, 470,000 square feet. Basically, the Ft. Junction PUD District allows for all levels of Commercial development, as well as light Industrial. The applicant has submitted a PUD plan for 123,000 square feet on 22 + acres within the District. The applicant asserts that its proposed land usage in Case Number S-344 meets a commercial definition as described in Weld County Zoning Ordinance. Although "correctional" or "prerelease" facilities are not specifically named in ordinance, the applicant, as have many previous applicants, relies on Weld County Ordinance 5.10 "All Uses Allowed by Right, Temporary 'Uses, and Uses by Special Review listed in this Ordinance are representative and are not all inclusive." Additionally, Ordinance 33.4.1. does state: "Intent of the C-3 District. To establish and preserve areas for activities which provide goods or services for the benefit of the general public or which require large amounts of space or high traffic volumes for generating business." That a preparole facility requires large amounts of space is clear in that the building is relatively large, and adequate spatial and landscape buffering is' desirable, as shown in the PUD Plan Application. That the land Usage provides services for the 91249 benefit of the general public is irrefutable, and is best described in the enabling legislation, co -sponsored by local legislators Senator Norton and Representative Jerke. This legislation concludes with the statement "The General Assembly hereby finds, determines, and declares that this act is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety." There is a Use Allowed By Right in a C-2 District (and then, C-3 District) for "Hospitals, nursing homes, and mental or physical rehabilitation centers" (Ordinance 33.3.2.11). Hospital is defined in ordinance as "Any institution receiving inpatients and rendering medical, surgical, psychiatric, or obstetrical care for humans to include general hospitals and specialized institutions." The applicant is not asserting that the prerelease facility is a hospital in the classic sense., However, it is clear that the proposed facility is a specialized institution that will render medical and psychiatric services in its normal course of operations. As required by the state, nursing staff will be on duty on a daily basis, and a physician clinic will be conducted three times per week. Psychiatric services will also be provided, as necessary. The applicant, however, does assert that the prerelease center is a rehabilitation facility, as allowed by Ordinance. In the absence of a specific definition of "Rehabilitation being contained in the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, the term is assigned its ordinary, contemporary meaning, per Ordinance 5.9. Rehabilitation is defined by Webster•s as: "1. to restore or bring to a state of health or useful and purposeful activity, as 1 1 1 1 1 1 921241 r 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 through training or therapy." As previously described, the prerelease center's operational and programmatic elements are rehabilitative by definition. Beyond medical and psychiatric services being provided, the program elements encompassing six hours per day are clearly rehabilitative in nature. The prerelease center will serve clients who "have significant, yet manageable physical or mental health limitations through functional mental health counseling", as described in The Villa's proposal to the state. The major purpose and intent of the prerelease center is provide rehabilitative programmatic elements directed toward the smooth and safe transition of incarcerated individuals to supervised release within their own communities. Program components such as Chemical Dependency, Relapse Prevention, Education, Cognitive Restructuring, Taking Responsibility, Interpersonal Skills, Family Relationships, Health and Wellness, Anger and Stress Management, Domestic Violence, etc. clearly define the operations of this prerelease center as a "Rehabilitation Center" as allowed by Weld County Zoning Ordinance in a C-2 or C-3 District. 1 GORSUCH,,KIRWS,CAMP$ELL,WALNER AND GROVER ATTORNCT& AT LAW 5V1TC 1100 1101 SCVCNTCCNTM STRUT DENVER, COLORADO 60202.062' MAI ONO ADORERS P: 0. sox i716O DENVER. COLORADO 60217.0160 TCLCPHONC 13031 C0u-6000 rAx 003) 206-0215 GERALD E. OAML October 5, 1993 Weld County Planning Commission Administrative Offices 1460 North 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 Re: Case No. S-344 The Villa at Geeley Inc. Members of the Commission: This letter supplements the letter -I presented the Commission on September 27, 1993. On- behalf of my client, the: Concerned Citizens of Southwest' Weld`County,'-I request that both letters be made a part of the record in this case. ACTION REQUESTED The Concerned Citizens urge the Commission to recommend denial of the application until such time as the underlying _FUJI district has been amended to allow prison uses.'The process of amending the PUD district will best serve the interests of the County, its residents, the local community -'and the -Applicant, as all•parties consider whether a prison is -appropriate in this area. REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATION OF DENIAL 1. The Fort Junction'=PUD District has been abandoned. The original PUD district was:approved-in_early 1989. The Weld County Zoning Ordinance regtires the.landowner;to either (1) present a PUD Plan application within one-year of the.PUD district DED\99498\71056.1 II EXHIBIT 921249 GORSUCH, KIRGIS.CAMPBELL,WALKER AND GROVER ATTORNEYS. AT'. LAW SU 1100 1+01 SEVENTEENTH STREET DENVER, COLORADO.00202.0624 MAILING ADDRESS P. 0. sOX i71so DENVER, COLORADO 430T17.0140 TELEPHONE t3031200-0000 FAX (3031 296-0216 GERALD E. OAHL October 5, 1993 Weld County Planning Commission Administrative Offices 1460 North 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 Re: Case No. S-344 The Villa at Greeley Inc. Members of the Commission: This letter supplements the letter I presented the Commission on September 27, 1993. On behalf, of my client, the:.Concerned Citizens of Southwest Weld County, I --request that both letters be made a part of the record in this case. ACTION REQUESTED The Concerned Citizens urge the Commission to recommend denial of -the application until such time as the underlying PUD.district has been amended to allow prison uses. The process of amending the PUD district will best -serve the interests -of the County, its residents, the local community and the Applicant, as-allparties consider whether a prison is appropriate, in this area. REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATION OP DENIAL 1. The Fort Junction POD District_has been abandoned. The original PUD district was approved. in early 1989. The Weld County Zoning Ordinance requires the landowner to. either (1) present a PUD Plan application within one.year of the PUD district GEp\99998\71056.1 EXHIBIT I 9212491 Weld County Planning Commission October 5, 1993 Page 2 approval, or (2) present evidence "substantiating that the PUD project has not been abandoned . . ." Section 28.15.5. My review of the file has disclosed-that•this.annual requirement was not fulfilled by the landowner in 1990, in 1991, or in 1992. The present PUD Plan application was filed over four (4) years after the PUD district was approved. 2. Prison uses were not contemplated at the time the Fort Junction PUD District Plan was approved. This issue is fundamental in the case. No one can honestly maintain that the 1988 rezoning contemplated a prison. I have reviewed the file approving the Fort -Junction PUD District. No mention of prison uses is made anywhere "in that record. The church applicant in 1989 had various -plans 'for a- church or school. In fact, as discussed below, it was the intention of the Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners at that time thatonly the specific listed uses in the C-1' through C-4 and I-1 zones were to be allowed as`a part of the Fort Junction PUD District rezoning. 3. Prison uses are not permitted by the Fort Junction PUD District. a. TX. ROCc Resolution The March 8, 1989 resolution of the Board of County Commissioners approving the Ft. Junction PUD is very specific with respect to the uses granted by that rezoning: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT -RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the application . . . for a Change of Zone from -A (Agricultural) -to Planned Unit Development (C-1, C-2, C-3, C-4 and I-1) uses as listed in the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, and one oil and gas production facility site on the above - referenced parcel of land be, and hereby is, granted subject to the following conditions: (emphasis supplied) The phraseology employed by the Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners in designating the "uses as listed" in the Weld County Zoning Ordinance was to- incorporate those uses specifically listed'in the C-1 through C-4 and I-1 districts. A PUD plan may not be approved"for m use--not-listed in the District. GED\99998\71056.1 9312.49 Weld County Planning Commission October 5, 1993 Page 3 The Zoning Ordinance aflows.the applicant:for PUD district rezoning -to request the specific use.desired;-;however, no request for prison or correctional facility .uses is made here. b. The Commercial Districts The C-1 through C-4 district use descriptions all include the offering of "goods and .services -to ,the public," and contain detailed lists of allowed uses in each category Zoning Ordinance, Sections 33.2; 33.3; 33.4; 33.5; 34.2. These descriptions do not include or contemplateprison uses.. "Prison," "preparole" or "correctional facility" do not appear as allowed uses in any of the C-1 through C-4 or I-1 zones. The requirement of the 1989 BOCC resolution is that such uses belisted to be allowed. Colorado follows the general rule of statutory interpretation that laws which specify certain situations must, be construed to exclude situations not specified. Truck -Insurance Exchange v. Home Insurance Company, 481 P.2d 354 (Colo. App. 1992); Never v. Charnes, 705 P.2d 93 (Colo., App. 1992). This rule has been applied in the zoning context, where a zoning statute or ordinance specifies certain uses, unlisted Uses are excluded. Cox v. Prince George's County, 586 A.2d 43 (Md 1991). The Weld County Zoning Ordinance specifically lists allowed uses in its Commercial zones. Prison uses are not listed in those zones, and are therefore excluded. The lists §_.Q include police and fire stations, butthe present application does not qualify for that category, even by analogy. The applicant is a for-profit corporation offering prison services, not to the general public.- Police and fire stations are. operated by local governments or special districts, and provide services to the general public. From the perspective of use compatibility, a prison bears The resemblance -to a police or fire station: the public and neighborhood safety aspects of the two uses could not be more different. c. Put, District ReaiirementS PUD district rezoning requires each PUD district to recite the uses allowed in that district. Uses in, a PUD Plan application "must be identical to those located and described on the Planned Unit Development District, plat." Section 28.9. The proposed use is not even listed in :the -referenced zones; the applicant can hardly claim that the proposed ;use. is "identical" to such a listed and -zoned use. The applicant, must demonstratethat its proposed .use is identical -to one:,shown on that ,,-plat. The plat, in turn, CED\9999av1056.1 931249 ' 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 Weld County Planning Commission October 5, 1993 Page 4 recites merely "C-1 - C-4," and "I-1." 'Planned development is not a catch-all for injecting into a neighborhood -a use which would otherwise not be allowed. Fordteasina Development Co. V. Board of County Commis, 186 Colo.' 418, 528 P.2d 237, 240 (1974); The Zoning Ordinance requires genuine specificity when uses are allowed in a PUD zone. There is an important public policy reason for requiring PUD plan applications to be only for those uses allowed by the underlying zoning. Failing to do so, as is here proposed, denies residents the due process protections of the rezoning process, as described below. 4. Processing a Pun plan application for a use not allowed in the underlying PUD district denies due process of law. It is important to establish at the outset that the final .PUD plan application under consideration in this case is not_an application for rezoning. A rezoning application would be subject to notice and hearing requirements which the applicant has .not satisfied in this case. ` For the county to treat this PUD :plan application for a non -listed use in this zone district as -a final plan application is to deny residents of the county due process of law and to render the actions of the county void. The members of the Concerned Citizens of Southwest Weld County, along with all residents of the County, have a constitutional right to due process of law. Due process "require(s) an opportunity for property owners to be heard before ordinances which substantially affect their property rights are adopted." Doard of County Commis v. City of Thornton, 629 P.2d 605, 611 (Colo. 1981) (citations omitted). The value and use of the property owned by these residents of Weld County will be substantially impacted by the proposed development. See:id, at 609 (recognizing that property owners have a legally protected interest in insulating their property from adverse effects caused by legally deficient zoning determinations concerning nearby property). Treating the application as a final PUD Plan, rather than requiring rezoning, 'offendsmy clients' constitutional right to due process, as well as the same rights held by all residents of the County. The PUD rezoning process provides the public with an opportunity for notice and hearing. The expedited plan approval . process does not. GED\99998\71056.1 9O1249 Weld County Planning Commission October 5, 1993 Page 5 Because. the 1989 approval of this PUD.District listed only use classifications which do not, include any prison or correctional facilities, the notice provided .to the public concerning, the PUD zoning in 1989 could not and did not:include notice of use of the involved property as a prison. Notice which doesnot mention the use involved fails to sufficiently warn all persons whoserightsmight be affected by the proposed action. See Fedder v. McCyrdv, 768 P.2d 711, 714 (Colo. App. 1988). There was no public. testimony at the hearing, held by this Commission on the PUD application in 1989. This is because no one was given notice that a prison facility would be allowed on the property as a consequence of the rezoning. No one can seriously believe that, had the application for PUD zoning in 1989 included prison uses in the list of uses approved, there would have been no public testimony? Colorado courts have recognized the importance of the constitutional protections afforded the public through the public notice and hearing requirements. for rezoning. Treatment of a request for an unpermitted use as anything less than a request for rezoning has been interpreted as an intolerable attempt to sidestep the normal processes required for rezoning, such as detailed notice requirements and study by the staff -and planning commission. Murray v. Moard of Adjustment. Lgrimer County, 42 Colo. App. 113, 594 P.2d 596, 597. (1979). The Application seeksa use not permitted in C-1 through C-4 or I-1. This is not simply a request for PUD approval. In effect, this application seeks rezoning. To proceed on this Application as though the requested use was a permitted use is to deny the concerned public due process. The entity responsible for zoning Foust, in the exercise of its police powers, afford procedural due process as delineated in its zoning code. McArthur v, Zabkg, 177 Colo. 377, 494 P.2d 89, 93 (1972). Residents of the County have -a right to rely upon the Weld County Zoning Ordinances and to rely on the fact that zoning of the land in their neighborhood will, not.bechanged absent substantial reasons therefor. fedcer v. McCurdy, 768 P.2d 711, 713 (Colo. App. 1988) (citing golly Dev't Inc. v. _Board of County commissioners, 140 Colo. 95, 342 P.2d 1032 (1959)). Processing this application for an unpermitted use would violate the County's own procedures. From -the standpoint of due process, property owners have the right .to proceed upon the assumption that the governing body will follow the dictates of the ordinances concerning zoning. McArthur v. Zabka, 494 P.2d'at 93. A legislative body is bound to follow the regulations it has adopted and, when the governmental body fails to follow the zoning OE0\99998\71056.1 1 1 1 1 II1 1 1 1 9C1249 1 Weld County Planning Commission October 5, 1993 Page 6 ordinances or its own established procedures when engaging in rezoning, it is violating the requirements of due process. See Mi;ler v. City of Albuaueraue, 554 P.2d 665, 668-69 (N.M. 1976). To process an application to develop a non -permitted prison use in the district denies Weld County residents due process of law by ignoring the requirements of the Zoning Code established for their protection. The proper procedure, which would provide due process, is to require an application under Section 28.15.1 to amend the district to add prisons as an allowed use, then to resubmit the current application. 5. The application impermissibly proposes an amendment: to the 1989 plat. As a condition of the Planning Commission's approval and the Board of County Commissioners' approval of the.Fort Junction PUD in 1989, the following plat note was required (and does appear) on the Fort Junction PUD District plat: a. Prior to recording a PUD plan plat, a law enforcement authority- shall be formed according to State Law. The law enforcement authority to be formed shall be Capable of expanding to serve other areas within the 1-25 MUD area to avoid duplication of overhead and other operating costs. This plat requirement was based, in turn, upon a Memorandum from the Weld County Sheriff dated December 20, 1988. A copy is attached hereto as Exhibit 2. The Memorandum states, in pertinent part: It will be our request that the New Creation Fort Junction development form an LEA or join the LEA created by the Crossroads Development if it is created first. We also request that whatever LEA is formed first, all other Del Camino area development be required to join, regardless of zoning, due to the significant concentration'. of - resources occurring at Del Camino. This area is literally becoming an unincorporated city that will demand far more resources than will be CE0\99998\710%.1 9C1249 Weld County Planning Commission October 5, 1993 'Page 7 available under. conventional county mill levys. (emphasis supplied) The applicant has (admittedly) not fulfilled this condition and instead claims that the County Sheriff has changed his mind and that an LEA is no longer necessary. However, neither the applicant nor the Sheriff can unilaterally or cooperatively amend the Fort Junction POD District plat. The Ft. Junction plat requires the formation of an LEA prior to the approval of an application for any development in the Ft. Junction POD. The plat note was established as part of rezoning process. It may not be eliminated by the Commission or the Board of County Commissioners as a part of the (current) POD plan approval process. No notice has been given to the public of any request to amend the Ft. Junction plat by deleting a requirement. Such notice is required to afford due process. A review of the file has confirmed that no plat amendment application or process has been initiated. Until this has been done, or the LEA has been formed as the plat note requires, the County is without power to approve a final POD application for any portion of the Fort Junction PUD District. 6. The proposed prison, use is incompatible with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan and with the affected community. The subject property lies within the Firestone/Frederick/ Dacono Urban Growth Boundary. (Comprehensive Plan, page 32.) The tri-area commission has unanimously recommended that the applica- tion be denied. This recommendation should be given weight by this Commission. (Comprehensive Plan, page 34, para. C.) Rather than "not objecting" to this land use application, the Longmont Planning Director, stated that "I understand that the proposed land use is consistent with the PUD and the Weld County Comprehensive Plan . " As described above, the proposed prison land use is not permitted in this POD; the Concerned Citizens further believe that it is inconsistent with the Weld County, Comprehensive Plan. The subject property is listed for commercial use in the I-25 Mixed Use Development Area Conceptual Land Use Plan. (Comprehensive Plan, page 46.) One•policy of the 1-25 PUD Area is that new development "demonstrate compatibility with existing surrounding land use ." (Comprehensive Plan, page 49, para. 5.) The Concerned Citizens reel strongly that.the proposed prison is not compatible with the surrounding- neighborhood. Evidence of this incompatibility is already present in the record- before the Commission: GED\99998\71056.1 1 1 1 1 I 1 91249 Weld County Planning Commission October 5, 1993 Page 8 a. Field check dated September 7, 1993: "This is in a highly -populated area because of all of the different businesses located to the west, because of kinds of businesses, this is an area where people come and go a lot." 1 1 1 I 1 b. Letters from homeowners in the neighborhood, expressing concern with the compatibility' of the use and the safety risks associated with inmates and visitors to the facility: (1) September 21,,1993: Roy M. Finnis (2) September 21, 1993: Terry and Jane Sprouse (3) June 17, 1993: Mary and Alvin Mengel (4) June 8, 1993: Vivian and Bob Konkle (5) June 9, 1993: Paul and Tammy Thompson (6) June 1,,1993: Marvin and Sharon Hopper, and others (7) June 11, 1993: David Koehler and (8) June 8, 1993: Frank Canepa. c. A People's Petition signed by over 1,400 residents of Southwest Weld County has been filed in opposition to the project and is in your packets. d. The Concerned Citizens will provide extensive testimony on this point. As part of its presentation to you today, the Concerned Citizens will present witnesses on the 'following subjects: (a) Nature of the expected prison population and capacity of the applicant to safely conduct that operation; (b) Concerns of' business owners in the Del Camino area with respect to the`economic'impact of the proposed operation on their:businesses, as well as the safety and welfare of their employees and customers. DED\99998\77056.7 901249 Weld County Planning Commission October 5, 1993 Page 9 (c) Concerns of neighboring communities, as expressed by various community leaders; (d) Neighborhood concerns ; relating to safety and compatibility, as expressed by individual residents and homeowners in the affected community. 7 The application does not satisfy the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. Planned development applications must meet all the standards and procedures set forth in the planned development ordinance. Ford Leasing De elooment Co. v. Board of County Commis, Colo. 528 P.2d 237, 240 (1974). The Weld County Zoning Ordinance sets out detailed requirements for a complete PUD plan application at Sections 28.9, 28.10 and 28.11. The present application fails to satisfy these requirements, either in scope or detail. In many instances, the applicant has simply copied general data submitted in 1988 for the PUD district application. As we know, the 1988 application neither mentioned nor contemplated a prison; data from that date is of little relevance to the present prison application. One of the submission requirements is an "off -site road improvements agreement proposal." Section 28.9.1.7. The applicant has submitted one such proposed agreement. However, at Exhibit 9 to the application, the applicant takes the position that no off - site road improvements are necessary. This is not consistent with the position of the Colorado Department of Transportation as found in Theresa G. Jones' letter on behalf of DOT to Keith Schuett, dated September 17, 1993. That letter provides, in pertinent part: It should be noted by both the County and the owners of the Fort Junction property that although the Department has clearly committed to the construction of the newly -aligned frontage road, we have not made a commitment to construct auxiliary lanes which are necessary to serve development along the state highway, as would be required by the State Highway -Access Code. . ... :The issue of who constructs that [right :right thru decel) lane remains to be resolved. (emphasis. supplied.) GED\99998\71056.1 1 1 1 I I 1 9012491 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Weld County Planning Commission October 5, 1993 Page 10 I am currently pursuing resolution of the Department's position. It must be noted that if our position is that the lanes made necessary by development must be constructed or guaranteed by the property owner, the State Highway. Access Permit required for construction of access from the frontage road must include those plans, along with a full description of the construction stating which will occur. The letter goes on to indicate that there appears to be. a "borderline" need for left deceleration lane. These issues are not addressed in the proposed Off -site Improvements Agreement submitted by the applicant.' CONCLUSION The applicant in this case has the burden of proof with respect to all six (6) of the criteria in Section 28.13.1. This letter and the presentation of the Concerned Citizens on October 5 will demonstrate that the applicant cannot meet that burden: 5 28.13.1.1: The proposal is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan. § 28.13.1.2: The PUD Plan applied for does not conform to the PUD district in which it is located (prison use not allowed). 5 28.13.1.3: The prison use applied for is not compatible with the surrounding area as demonstrated by the County Comprehensive Plan and local planning agencies. § 28.13.1.5: The application does not comply with the relevant Overlay District requirement. (Section 54.3: Use Permitted - prison use not permitted in the Fort Junction PUD district.) 5 28.13.1.6: The application fails to satisfy the submittal requirements for a proper PUD Plan. The Concerned Citizens urge the Commission to recommend denial of the application for the reasons described. cE0\8\71056.1 921249 Weld County Planning Commission October 5, 1993 Page 11 1 /Ours:truly, GORSUCR, KIRGIS, CAMPBELL, R AND GRO Gerald E Dahl GED:nc -- cc: Concerned Citizens of Southwest Weld County GED\9997871056.1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9;1249 I Concerned Citizens of Southwest Weld County 1 t 1 I 1 i 1 1 1 EXIUISITS i2. Description 1. Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners, March 8, 1989. 2. Ft. Junction PUD District Plat, recorded February 13, 1990. 3. Memorandum from Office of the Weld County Sheriff, December 20, 1988. 4. Letters submitted to Weld County and identified at p 5 of Dahl October 5 letter. 5. People's Petition. cm\swis\?1847.1 9c1249 -OCT _a '9Z 15:Z9 FRC ELD CO TREASURER TO 12980.2 • PAGE.002/006 1 1 t 1 • RESOLUTION I MAR 1 4 1989 Eti Co. ?Newt :•merVP RE: GRANT CHANGE or ZONE FROM A (AGRICULTURAL) TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (C-1, C-2, C-3, C-4, AND I-1) USES AS LISTED IN THE WELD COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE, AND ONE OIL AND GAS PRODUCTION FACILITY -SITE FOR NEW CREATIONS MINISTRIES AND WORLD OUTREACH CENTER CHURCH WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld.County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the 8th day of March, 1989, at 10:00 a.m. for the purpose of hearing the application of New Creations Ministries and World Outreach Center Church, 737 Bross Street, Longmont, Colorado 80501, requesting a Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) to Planned Unit Development (C-1, C-2, C-3, C-4, and I-1) uses as listed in the weld County Zoning Ordinance, and one oil and gas production facility site for a parcel of land located on the -:following described real estate, to -wit: Part of the -SW}, Section 2:, Township 2 North, Range'68 West -of the 6th-P.M.,'Weld- County, Colorado WHEREAS, the applicant- was represented by Vern Nelson, of Nelson -Engineers, and WHEREAS, Section 28.8 --of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance provides standards for review of such AlChange of Zone, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners heard all the testimony and statements ofthose present, has studied the request of the applicant and the ' -recommendations of the Weld County Planning Commission, and, having been fully 'informed, finds that this request shall be approved for the following reasons: 1. The applicant has complied with all- the application requirements listed in' -Section 28.5et-seq., of the Weld County:Zoning Q4 0/00 COi`' / ne,7, •v�r— OCT 4 '93 15:29 FRC E -D CO TREASURER _ TO 22%OZ PACE.O0:,,0O5 I- C '' Page 2 RE: COZ - NEW CREATIONS • 2. The request is in conformance with Section 28.8 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: a. The proposed Planned Unit Development _(PUD) district is located within the X-25 Mixed -Use Development (MUD) area. Theuses associated with the proposed POD district are consistent with the uses described in the I-25 MUD section of the ,Comprehensive..Plr_n.,• b. The uses allowed in the proposed PUD district will. conform with the performance standards contained in Section 35.3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance.' c. The uses permitted shall be compatible with the existing or future development of the surrounding area as permitted by the existing zone district, and with future !development as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. The Tri-Area Planning Com- mission•reviewed,this proposal on aanuary.3,, 1989, and recommended no objections. d. The Central Weld County Water District will provide water:service. to -the, POD !district., The St. Vrain Sanitation District .will• provide•'.. sewer service to the PUD district. e. The applicant has submitted a traffic impact study for the POD district. This studyrecommends certain improvements to the future frontage road and Weld County Road 24 because these roads. provide • access to the PUD district.' Ofd pits" road improvements will be accomplished through a road improvementdistrict.:or an approved' agreement. .This concept ,has•be& approved by•the Department of • Planning .Services„- County _Engineer, and:_Colorado Division of:Highways.,u A, road improvement district or agreement will, help mitigate impacts to ,Weld County Road 24 and the future East X-25 Frontage Road. Weld,County -24 and the State Highway Frontage Road? are currently inadequate in functional design, width,. -and structural capacity to meet the traffic requirements of uses within the 1 I 1 1 1 1 890233 , 901249 ,CCT 4 '9: :5:40 FRC ELD CO TREASURER TO 129EO2 PAr,E.004/00o 1 1 I 1 1 1 Page 3 RE: COZ — NEW CREATIONS proposed PUG district. Access constraints to development will -be addressed as notes on the POD district plat and as a PUG plan application requirement. f. The subject site does not contain any known commercial mineral deposits. g. No overlay districts affect the site.. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the application of New Creations Ministries and World Outreach Center Church for a Change of Zone from. A (Agricultural) to Planned Unit Development (C-1, C-2, C-3, C-4, and I-1) uses aslisted in the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, and one oil and gas production facility site on the above referenced parcel of land be, and hereby is, granted subject to the following conditions: 1. The following notes shall be placed on the PUD district plat: a. Prior to recording a PUD. plan plat, a law enforcement authority shall be formed according to State Law. The law enforcement authority to be formed shall be capable of. expanding to serve other areas within the I-25 MOD area to avoid duplication of overhead and other operating costs. b. All streets within the PUG. district, except the future East I-25 Frontage Road, are private and shall be maintained by owners of the POD district, unless other arrangements are approved by the Board of County Commissioners. c. The future East I-25 Frontage Road shall be completed or guaranteed with an improvement agreement prior to recording the initial POD plan. d. There shall be one access. from .the POD to Weld County Road 24 via 'the future frontage road. The future frontage road shall align with the future frontage road to the south. 890233 9vyN49 OCT 4 '9; 13:aO FROM 'LC' CO TREASURER Page 4 RE: COZ - NEW CREATIONS TO 1-"se0`1` P GE.005✓C0e e. One access from the PUD to Weld County Road 24-1/2 shall be considered. The access shall align with a future access north of weld County Road 24-1/2, if proposed, and not interfere with the intersection of Weld County Road 24-1/2 and the East X-25 Frontage Road. f. An access easement shall be provided to the north side of the Kahn Subdivision. The initial POD plan application will include a - traffic master plan developed in coordination with. the Fort Junction -traffic Impact Study.as prepared by Matthew J. Delich, P.E., dated November, 1988. The master plan shall -outline all the proposed improvements for the entire PUD district and be coordinated with 'other traffic master plans. developed for this area. h. .Each PUD plan application shall include a traffic impact study performed in 'conjunction. with the study titled; Fort Junction Traffic Impact Study,' prepared by Matthew J. Delich, November,. 1988. An off -site road improvements agreement or a local improvements district -shall Also be in place and capable• of generating funds. to construct the off -site road improvements needed to serve the PUD district and plan. i. The initial POD plan.' application shall include a master drainage plan considering the entire site. Subsequent POD plans shall -Include a drainage plan which -updates the master drainage plan. j.' Each PUD plan application shall include' a management plan to control weeds before, during, and after development. This plan shall be approved by the Longmont Soil' Conservation .District. .k. The requirements of- the Longmont -Fire Protection District shall be met as part of the POD plan application,; requirements. 890233 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 901249 1 1 0CT 4 •yam 15:40 FR' \CLD CO TREASURER TO 12"980' Page 5 RE: COZ - NEW CREATIONS PKE.006/0oe I.' A site plan review is required in accordance with Section 33.4.5 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. m. The requirements of the Rural Ditch Company and Colorado Geological Survey shall be met as part of a PUD Plan Application. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 8th day of March, A.D., 1989. ATTEST: Weld County Clerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board APPRO'tD AS TO FORM_ I C177 my Attorney 1 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO C.W. Xir y,Chairman 890233 TOTAL PAGE.006 mss. 9µ1249 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 if ff 1 ter I` �_ . !pi '{'dii':p �y ' ' !!11 t� I 'i<" �Il11 I ;uiw,tl,;l,.,llaal . k.'r�! �c ��tNt 1ii� t 1'1'(1' rlli(� P'�rlbir'a (' l�l I I fY ° U Idsi . ,ti ��1— �al�p.�l�auGi,i', at —� t�lt. Jil.,1� t1t14I �i �1 111 ._ 1( Pill l; lid!" lieu ' r ' 1 �3 I. 'jllj;ll .4 11 1 ii; r !e I d� I l!!;lilt q'jlira'i(t i;I I llilL18S!!it!'"2'''t l lll; 1I 4e i t ill" f f' f ----- _llai'ihiujlrriGllri;r� —"K"--------scrr— _ — I/rPtpro.d'44 Oww •9s r�.�+.• �j - -_--.. 9..11249 .._ . . I r _ I 1 1 1 1 I bid toe moat cassomt. OFFICE( OF THE c ,HERIFF MEMORANDUM TO FROM DATE RE rd T,ra-.., 1?2flAR PTAs R.rinw:t I have reviewed the PUB request by New Creation Ministries for the northeast corner of CR 24 and I-25. There has been a similar request for the southeast corner involving over 200 acres and potentially over 2,000 persons under the name of Crossroads. Del Camino, case number Z-447. It was our requirement that the development proposed in 2required form Law aw Enforcement. Authority because of the proposed substantial residential for resources. However, with this proposal, we no have an additional concern of highly concentrated commercial development in conjunction with substantial existing commercial development already present. It will be our request that the New Creation Fort Junction development form an LEA or Join the LEA created by the Crossroads development if it is created first. We also request that whatever LEA is formed first..all other Del Camino area development be required to join. regardless of zoning,.due to the significant concentration of resources occurring at Del Camino. This area is literally becoming an unincorporated city that will demand far more resources than will be available under conventional county mill levys_ 9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 GERALO E. DAML GORSUCH. KIRG IS, CAMPBELL, WALKER AND GROVER ATTORNEYS AT LAW SUITE 1100 1401 9CVCNTECNTM STREET DENVER, COLORADO 80202.9e2m MAILING ADDRESS .R. 0. e0% 171e0. DENVER. COLORADO 40217.0100 TELERMONE (3031299.0900 /AR (3031Z98•0215 October 5, 1993 Weld County Planning Commission Administrative Offices 1460 North 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 Re: Case No. S-344 The Villa at Greeley Inc. Members of the Commission: This letter supplements the letter I presented the Commission on September 27, 1993. On behalf of my client, the Concerned Citizens of Southwest Weld County, I request that both letters be made a part of the record in this case. ACTION REQUESTED The Concerned Citizens urge the Commission to recommend denial of the application until such time as the underlying PUD district has been amended to allow prison uses. The process of amending the PUD district will best serve the interests of the County, its residents, the local community and the Applicant, as all parties consider whether a prison is appropriate in this area. REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATION OF DENIAL 1. The Fort Junction POD District has been abandoned. The original -PUD district was approved in early 1989. The Weld.County -Zoning Ordinance requires the landowner -to either (1) present a PUD Plan application within one-year of the PUD district GED\99998\71056.1 9C1249 Weld County Planning Commission October 5, 1993 Page 2 approval, or (2) present evidence "substantiating that the PUD project has not been abandoned . . ." Section 28.15.5. My review of the file has disclosed that this annual requirement was not fulfilled by the landowner in 1990, in 1991, or in 1992. The present PUD Plan application was filed over four (4) years after the PUD district was approved. 2. Prison uses were not contemplated at the time the Fort Junction PUD District Plan was approved. This issue is fundamental in the case. No one can honestly maintain that the 1988 rezoning contemplated a prison. I have reviewed the file approving the Fort Junction PUD District. No mention of prison uses is made anywhere in that record. The church applicant in 1989 had various plans for a church or school. In fact, as discussed below, it was the intention of the Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners at that time that only the specific listed uses in the C-1 through C-4 and I-1 zones were to be allowed as a part of the Fort JunctionPUDDistrict, rezoning. 3. Prison uses are not permitted by the. Fort Junction POD District. a. The BOCC Resolution The March 8, 1989 resolution of the Board of County Commissioners approving. the Ft. Junction POD is very specific with respect to the uses granted by that rezoning: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the application . . . for a Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) to Planned Unit Development (C -1, C-2, C-3, C-4 and I-1). uses as listed in the Weld. County Zoning Ordinance, and one oil and gas production facility site on the above - referenced parcel of land be, and hereby is, granted subject to the following conditions: (emphasis. supplied) The phraseology employed by the Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners in designating the "uses as listed" in the Weld County Zoning Ordinance wasto incorporate those uses specifically listed in the C-1 through'C-.4 and .I -1 districts. A PUD.plan may not be approved for -a use not listed in the District. GED\99998\71056.1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I i I 91249 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Weld County Planning Commission October 5, 1993 Page 3 The Zoning Ordinance allows the applicant for PUD district rezoning to request the specific use ,_ desired; however, no request for prison or correctional facility uses is made here. b. The Commercial Districts The C-1 through C-4 district use descriptions all include the offering of "goods and services to the public," and contain detailed lists of allowed uses in each category Zoning Ordinance, Sections 33.2; 33.3; 33.4; 33.5; 34:2. 'These descriptions do not include or contemplate prison uses. "Prison," "preparole" or "correctional facility" do not appear as allowed uses in any of the C-i through c-4 or I-1 zones. The requirement of the 1989 BOCC resolution is that such uses be listed to be allowed. Colorado follows the general rule of statutory interpretation that laws which specify certain situations must be construed to exclude situations not specified: Truck Insurance Exchange v. Home Insurance Company, 481 P.2d 354 (Colo. App. 1992); Never v. Charnes, 705 P.2d 93 (Colo. App. 1992). This rule has been applied in the zoning context,, where a zoning statute or ordinance specifies certain uses, unlisted uses are excluded. Cox v. Prince George's County, 586 A.2d 43 (Md 1991). The Weld County Zoning Ordinance specifically lists allowed uses in its Commercial zones. Prison uses are not listed in those zones, and are therefore excluded. The lists lo include police and fire stations, but the present application does not qualify for that category, even by analogy. The applicant is a for-profit corporation offering prison services, not tothe general public. Police and fire stations are operated by local governments or special districts, and provide services to the general public. From the perspective of use compatibility, a prison bears im resemblance to a_police or fire station: the public and neighborhood safety aspects of the two uses could not be more different. C. PUD District Requirements PUD district rezoning requires each PUD district to recite the uses allowed in that district. Uses in a PUD Plan application "must be identical to those located and described on the Planned Unit Development District plat." Section 28.9. The proposed use is not even listed in the referenced zones; the applicant can hardly claim that the proposed use is "identical" to such a listed and zoned use. The applicant must demonstrate that its proposed use is identical to one shown on that plat. The plat, in turn, CED\99998\71056.1 921249 Weld County Planning Commission October 5, 1993 Page 4 recites merely "C-1_- C-4," and "I-1." Planned development is not a catch-all for injecting into a. neighborhood a use which would otherwise not be allowed. 'Ford Leasina Development Co. v. Board of County Commie, 186 Colo. 418, 528 P.2d 237, 240 (1974). The Zoning Ordinance requires genuine specificity when uses are allowed in a PUD zone. There is an important public policy reason for requiring PUD plan applications to be only for those uses allowed by the underlying zoning.- Failing to do so, as is here proposed,. denies residents the due process protections of the rezoning process, as described below. 4. Processing a PUD plan application for use not allowed in the underlying PUD district denies due process of law. It is important to establish at the outset that the final PUD plan application under consideration in this case is not an application for rezoning. A rezoning application would be subject to notice and hearing requirements which the applicant has not satisfied in this case... For the county to treat this PUD plan application for a non -listed use in this zone'district as.a final plan application is to deny residents of the county due process of law and to render the actions of the county void. The members of the Concerned Citizens of Southwest Weld County, along with all residents of the County, have a constitutional right to due. process, of law. Due process "require[s] an opportunity for property owners to be heard before ordinances which substantially affect their property rights are adopted." Board of County Comm'rs v. city of Thornton, 629 P.2d 605, 611 (Colo. 1981) (citations omitted). The value and use of the property owned by these residents of Weld. County will be substantially impacted by the proposed'development. See id, at 609 (recognizing that property owners have a legally protected interest in insulating their property from adverse effects caused by legally deficient zoning determinations concerning nearby property). Treating the application as a final PUD Plan, rather than requiring rezoning, offends my clients' constitutional right to due process, as well as the same rights held by ,all residents of the County. The PUD rezoning process, provides the, public with -an opportunity for notice and hearing., The expedited plan approval process does not. CED\99998\71056.1 1 9012,491 , 1 Weld County Planning Commission October 5, 1993 Page 5 1 1 1 0 1 1 Because the 1989 approval of this PUD District listed only use classifications which do not include any prison or correctional facilities, the notice provided to the public concerning the PUD zoning in 1989 could not and did not include notice of use of the involved property as a prison. Notice which does not mention the use involved fails to sufficiently warn all persons whose rights might be affected by the proposed, action. See Fedder V. M mon 768 P.2d 711, 714 (Colo. App. 1988). There was no stestiy, at the hearing held by this Commission on the PUD applicationoin 1989. This is because no one was given notice that a prison facility would be allowed on the property as a consequence of the rezoning. No one can seriously believe that, had the application for PUD zoning in 1989 included prison uses in the list of uses approved, there would have been no public testimony? Colorado courts have recognized the importance of the constitutional protections afforded the public through the public notice and hearing requirements for rezoning. Treatment of a request for an unpermitted use as anything less than a request for rezoning has been interpreted as an intolerable attempt to sidestep the normal processes required for rezoning, such as detailed notice requirements and study by the staff and planning commission. Murray v. Board of Adjustment. Larymer County, 42 Colo. App. 113, 594 P.2d 596, 597 (1979). The Application seeks a use not permitted in C-1 through C-4 or I-1. This is not simply a request for PUD approval. In effect, this application seeks rezoning. To proceed on this Application as though the requested use was a permitted use is to deny the concerned public due process. The entity responsible for zoning must, in the exercise of its police powers, afford procedural due process as delineated in its zoning code. McArthur v. Zabka, 177 Colo. 377, 494 P.2d 89, 93 (1972). Residents of the County have a right to rely upon the Weld County Zoning Ordinances and to rely on the fact that zoning of the land in their neighborhood will not be changed absent substantial reasons therefor. islosis_,_=mray, 768 P.2d 711, 713 (Colo. App. 1988) (citing )lolly Dev't Inc. v. Board Qommissioners, 140 Colo. 95, 342 P.2d 1032 (1959)). County Processing this application for an unpermitted use would violate the County's own procedures. From the standpoint of due process, property owners have the right to proceed upon the assumption that the governing body will follow the dictates of the ordinances concerning, zoning. j(cArthur v;` Zabka, 494 P.2d at 93. A legislative body is bound to follow -'the regulations it has adopted and, when the governmental body fails to follow the zoning GED\99998\71056.1 9;21249 Weld County Planning Commission October 5, 1993 Page 6 1. ordinances or its own established procedures when engaging in rezoning, it is violating the -requirements.; of due process. See Miller v. City of Albuaueraue, 554 P.2d 665, 668-69 (N.M.:1976). To process an application to develop a non -permitted prison use in the.district.denies Weld County residents due process of law by ignoring the requirements of the Zoning Code established for their protection. The proper procedure, which would provide due process, is to require an application -under Section 28.15.1 to amend the district to add prisons as an allowed use,. then to resubmit the current application. 5. The application impermissibly proposes an amendment to the 1989 plat. As a condition of the Planning Commission's. approval and the Board of County Commissioners' approval of the Fort Junction PUD in 1989,the following plat note was required (and does appear) on the Fort Junction PUD District plat: a. Prior to recording a PUD plan plat, a law enforcement authority shall be 'formed according. to State Law. The law enforcement authority to be formed shall be. capable of expanding to 'serve other areas within the 1-25 MUD area to avoid duplication of overhead and' other operating costs. This plat requirement was based, in turn,, upon a Memorandum from the Weld County Sheriff dated December 20, 1988. A copy is attached hereto as Exhibit 2. The Memorandum states, in pertinent part: It will be our request that the New Creation Fort Junction development form an LEA or join- the LEA created 'by the Crossroads Development if it is created first. We also request that whatever LEA is formed first, all other Del Camino area development be required to join, regardless of zoning, due to the. significant concentration of resources occurring at Del Camino.. This area Is literallybecoming an unincorporated city that will demand -far more resources than will, be GED\99998\71056.1 1. 1 1 1_. 1 i 9;:1249 I ?i2491 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 Weld County Planning Commission October 5, 1993 Page 7 available under conventional county mill levys. (emphasis supplied) The applicant has (admittedly) not fulfilled this condition and instead claims that the County Sheriff has changed his mind and that an LEA is no longer necessary. However, neither the applicant nor the Sheriff can unilaterally or cooperatively amend the Fort Junction PUD District plat. The Ft. Junction plat requires the formation of an LEA prior to the d;oroval of an application for any development in the Ft. Junction PUD. The plat note was established as part of rezoning process. It may not be eliminated by the Commission or the Board of County Commissioners as a part of the (current) PUD plan approval process. No notice has been given to the public of any request to amend the Ft. Junction plat by deleting a requirement.. Such notice is required to afford due process. A review of the file has confirmed that no plat amendment application or process has been initiated. Until this has been done, or the LEA has been formed as the plat note requires, the County is without power to approve a final PUD application for any portion of the Fort Junction PUD `,District. 6. The proposed prison use is incompatible with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan and with -the affected community. The subject property lies within the Firestone/Frederick/ Dacono Urban Growth Boundary. (Comprehensive Plan, page 32.) The tri-area commission has unanimously recommended that the applica- tion be denied. This recommendation should be given weight by this Commission. (Comprehensive Plan, page 34, para. C.) Rather than "not objecting" to this land use application, the Longmont Planning Director, stated that "I understand that the proposed land use is consistent with the PUD and the Weld. County Comprehensive Plan . .." As described above, the proposed prison land use is not permitted in this PUD; the Concerned Citizens further, believe that it is inconsistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. The subject, property is listed for commercial use in the 1-25 Mixed Use Development Area Conceptual Land Use Plan. (Comprehensive Plan, page 46.) One policy of the I-25 PUD Area is that new development "demonstrate compatibilitywith_ existing surrounding land use . . ." (Comprehensive Plan,.page 49.; para. 5.) The Concerned Citizens feel strongly that the. proposed prison is not compatible with the surrounding neighborhood Evidence of this incompatibility is already present in the .record before the Commission: cE0\99998\71056.1 901249 . Weld County Planning Commission October 5, 1993 Page 8 a. Field check dated September 7, 1993: "This is in a highly -populated area because of all of the different businesses located to the west; because of kinds of businesses, this is an area where people come and go a lot." b. Letters from homeowners in the neighborhood, expressing concern with the compatibility of the use and the safety risks associated with inmates and visitors to the facility: (1) September 21, 1993: Roy M. Finnis (2) September 21, 1993: Terry and Jane Sprouse (3) June 17, 1993: Mary and Alvin Mengel (4) June 8, 1993: Vivian and Bob Rankle (5) June 9, 1993: Paul and Tammy Thompson'' (6)_ June 1, 1993: Marvin and Sharon Hopper, and others (7) June 11, 1993: -David Koehler and (8) June 8, 1993: Frank Canepa. c. A People's Petition signed by over 1,400 residents of Southwest Weld County has been filed in opposition to the project and is in your packets. d The Concerned Citizens will provide extensive testimony on this point. As part of its presentation to you today, the Concerned Citizens will present witnesses on the following_, subjects: (a) Nature of the expected prison population and capacity of the applicant to safely conduct that operation; (b) Concerns of business owners in the Del Camino area with respect to the economic impact of -the proposed operation 'on their businesses,; as well as the safety and welfare of their employees and customers: CED\99995\71056.1 1 931249' Weld County Planning Commission October 5, 1993 Page 9 (c) Concerns of neighboring communities, as expressed by various community leaders: 1 I t 1 (d) Neighborhood concerns relating to safety and compatibility, as expressed by individual residents and homeowners in the affected community. 7. The application does not satisfy the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. Planned development applications must meet all the standards and procedures set forth in the planned development ordinance. lord Leasing Development Co. v. Board of County Comm'rs, Colo. 528 P.2d 237, 240 (1974). The Weld County Zoning Ordinance sets out detailed requirements for a complete PUD plan application at Sections 28.9, 28.10 and 28.11. The present application fails to satisfy these requirements, either in scope or detail. In many instances, the applicant has simply copied general data submitted in 1988 for the PUD district application. As we know, the 1988 application neither 'mentioned nor contemplated a prison; data from that date is of little relevance to the present prison application. One of the submission requirements is an "off -site road improvements agreement proposal." Section 28.9.1.7. The applicant has submitted one such proposed agreement. However, at Exhibit 9 to the application, the applicant takes the position that no off - site road improvements are necessary. This is not consistent with the position of the Colorado Department of Transportation as found in Theresa G. Jones' letter on behalf of DOT to Keith Schuett, dated September 17, 1993. That letter provides,, in pertinent part: It should be noted by both the County and the owners of the Fort Junction property that although the Department has clearly committed to the construction of the newly -aligned frontage road, we have not made a commitment to construct auxiliary lanes which are necessary to serve development along the state highway, as would be required by, the State Highway Access Code. . _ . The issue' of 'who constructs that (right [right thru decel] lane remains to be resolved. (emphasis Supplied.) GED\99998\77056.7 9C1249 Weld County Planning Commission October 5, 1993 Page 10 I am currently pursuing resolution of the Department's.. position. It must be noted that if our position is that the lanes made necessary by development must be constructed or guaranteed by the property owner, the State Highway Access Permit required for construction of access from the frontage road mustinclude those plans, along with a full description of the construction stating which will occur. The letter goes on to indicate that .there appears to be a "borderline" need for a left deceleration lane. These issues_are not addressed in the proposed Off -site Improvements Agreement submitted by the applicant. CONCLUSION The applicant in this case has the burden of proof with respect to all six (6) ofthe criteria in Section 28.13.1. This letter and the presentation of the. Concerned Citizens on October 5 will demonstrate that the applicant cannot meet that burden: § 28.13.1.1: The proposal is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The the § 28.13.1.2: The PUD Plan applied for does not conform to the. PUD district in which it is located (prison use not allowed). § 28.13.1.3: The prison useapplied for is not compatible with the surrounding area as demonstrated by the County ,Comprehensive Plan and local planning agencies. § 28.13.1.5: The application does not comply with the relevant.. Overlay, District requirement. (Section 54..3:, Use Permitted - prison use not permitted in the Fort Junction PUD district.) § 28.13.1.6: The application fails tosatisfy the submittal requirements' for. a proper PUD Plan. Concerned Citizens urge the Commission to recommend denial of application for the reasons described. GED\99998\71056.1 9Z1241 Gerald E. Dahl Weld County Planning Commission October 5, 1993 Page 11 Yours truly, GORSUCH, KIRGIS, CAMPBELL, R AND GRO GED:nc cc: Concerned Citizens of Southwest Weld County CED\99998\71056.1 921249 r Colorado Revised Statutes 17-25.103 No adult felony violent or sex offender shall be placed by the department in a minimum security facility in any county without first having been placed in at least one more restrictive setting for less than six months. 'The six month requirement may be waived only with the approval of the executive director of the department, chief of the diagnostic unit, and officer in charge of the receiving minimum security facility. 1 1 I e I I I 1 I I I I e 08 June 93 __621_ WCR 13 Longmont, CO 80504 County Commissioners Office Attention: Barb Kirkmeyer O. Box 758 Greeley CO 80632 In the near future you may be asked to consider the construction of a pre -parole facility in the Del Camino community --in the general area ' of Interstate 25. and Colorado 119 (Weld County Road 24.) I have had the opportunity to attend meetings concerning this Ilproposal; the initial meeting being organized the by the developers and proponents of this venture. In. each case, it has been very apparent that the members of the community are unequivocally opposed to this project. While my initial perceptions were neutral, as I 'secured more information on the impacts of such a facility it became obvious that this type of facility has significant negative impacts on the community over the long term. 'Similar facilities have been proposed along the front range recently. In at least nine (9) communities, including three in Weld County, the "'Aftlocal governments have investigated and evaluated similar proposals. After careful consideration, each of these governments has voted not er to approve this type of facility in their communities. The overwhelming factor was that the short-term economic benefits of such a facility are overwhelmed by the long-term negative impacts on the surrounding area. 'The operators of The Villa facility in Greeley, were unable generate enough support in the Greeley area to secure approval for a pre -parole facility --even though they have been operating in Greeley for a number of years. Basically, it comes down to the fact that their past ,performance does not generate confidence on the part of the Greeley community to be allowed the opportunity to locate this facility in the area. 'Based on the negative response in the Greeley area, these individuals pursued similar opportunities in the -Evans and Windsor areas, where - 'they met with -similar rejection by the local governments. Now,'they are bypassing theincorporated areas, and pursuing their agenda in unincorporated weld County where the community is -more dispersed and organized resistance is perceived to be less of an issue. The 'underlying intention is that the Weld County government may be more • likely to approve their proposal. ecognizing the fact that you will. have -a difficult decision to make "'regarding the proposed development, I have researched this agenda and have identified the following factors 1. The concept of pre -parole facilities is new to the State of Colorado. Legislation approving this concept has only. been in place for:less than two years 2. The proposed:facility=in weld County is effectively an 9u49 "experiment". N. -e references are made to miler fac' 'es in. other states, no similar facility exists in Colorado. 3. Under the law authorizing creation of pre -parole fac4'"-es,'they will be required to take any and all offenders, including those with violent histories. Should any incidents occur inside the facility, support will be provided from Canon City (about 3 hours travel time). 4. The residents of this facility are felonious offenders. - The statement that these individuals are "non-violent", reflects only the fact that they have not been CONVICTED of violent offenses. Research shows that those involved in drug trafficking are likely to have committed violent acts which are not able to be "proven beyond a reasonable doubt" for conviction. Nonetheless, their activities in the past indicate that they may be prone -to or:have participated in violent activities if only by their.participation in drug -related activities. It should be noted here that a large percentage of drug offenders are not typically remanded to the custody of the Department of Corrections. Those individual that are have exhausted the legal system to the point where incarceration was the only alternative. Many, if not most, are repeat offenders, and ALL are FELONS. 5. The classification (Class I -V) :of a prisoner is as much.a reflection of a persons ability to conform to standards of behavior within the corrections system, as it is the activity that caused them to be remanded to the custody of the state. The ability to follow corrections guidelines and regulations, interact appropriately with,corrections officers, and the evaluations of corrections mental health professionals (an in -exact science at best) may reflect the the classification of inmates as well --regardless of their intial offense(s). 6. The impact on the community transcends the facility itself, as the inmates have visitation privileges. In both Ordway and Limon, law enforcement has noted that the traffic for visitors to the facilities -is reflected in increased drunk -driving offenses, possession. of contraband (e.g. drugs) and other offenses. -This undoubtedlyis reflected by The Villa's admission that dogs will be used to search the facility for contraband. This contraband is provided typically by visitors.to.the facility. In Limon, the court case load has increased significantly as any offenses inside -the facility -must.. be adjudicated in the county court system. ,The county has had -to measureably increase their investments in security at -the courts due to the volume and types of offenses perpetrated in the facility. 7. In speaking with individuals in..Ordway, the economic benefits anticipated by the corrections facility have not materialized. This has been due,to.the.fact.thatemployees 9,1249 of the fa '•-y, ile residing within the c .muting limitations established, have chosen to live in communities. outside the Ordway area. If one would extrapolate a similar impact in Southern Weld County, employees commuting 20-30 minutes could reside in Longmont, Loveland, Boulder, Northglenn and Thornton. Weld County would, in fact, assume all of the risks while hoping the few benefits actually materialize. The issues concerned with development in our county are extremely complex. The concept of balancing the economic demands and the harmonious development of the county need to be adhered to under the terms of the comprehensive plan. Exceptions to the comprehensive plan should be diligently explored as to their impacts and long-term mplications for the county. 1•_ As you are asked to evaluate the concept of any corrections related "'foremost `acility in the county, you are asked to keep the following criteria in your mind: ' 1. Since Weld County has significantly less. population than those counties to its west and south, are we prepared to assume responsibility for managing and supporting the undesirable elements generated in those counties, or for ' that matter, the State of Colorado? we have to determine if Weld County is prepared to assume as disproportionate part of the burden for the State. Can we afford to sacrifice control over our own lives because weld County is prepared to relieve the metro areas of their ' problems? 2. Other counties have invited development based on I perceived economic benefits, only to find the benefits are short-lived and the impacts are longterm. A. The mountain communities that endorsed gambling have now found their communities are changed forever. The impacts on traffic, law enforcement, pollution and other factors are only now being realized and Iit's too late to turn back the clock. _ B. The town of Ordway, has not experienced the rush I economic development anticipated. In fact, the general feeling is that should -Ordway have the opportunity to make the decision over again, the. I population would NOT support the construction of the" corrections facility in their community. C. I have addressed the court -case issue in Limon Iearlier in Item 6 above. I 3. Is Weld County prepared to experiment with the pre -parole concept, before the Department of Corrections has finalized their agenda and conducted public review? I Without all of the facts, we may be endorsing a concept that 'once implemented is difficult (orimpossible) to -remedy. 9w12.49 The potential- ex. .s to. support development ly to - realize that the business concept, has changed as it is implemented. Once construction begins, it is virtually impossible to stop the process. The business charterproposed by The Villa is premature. The administrative and financial -considerations, under the House Bill authorizing the pre -parole concept, may be modified at any time to suite the needs of the State --leaving Weld County having to react to y the fiat of legislative committees and lobbyists. History shows that the state legislature is sometimes extremely insensitive to the constraints under which county and local governments operate. Addtionally, The Villa does not have a contract with the State. There business. plan assumes the services contract will be awarded if they can show they have all of the approvals.. 4. The overall tax revenue to the county is minimal. Based on a $10,000,000 construction cost (The Villa's number), a taxable value of 29% (or 52.9 million), and a mill levy of 122.839 will yield tax revenues of $356,231 annually. When one applies the public services required to support the. proposed facility, the incremental revenue provided does not begin to approach the costs of additional police, road, and other public services required in the area. When adding costs for additional requirements made on the justice system -- it is painfully obvious that all citizens of Weld County will have to sacrifice --while a very few benefit. When providing these incremental services within an incorpora- ted area, the associated costs are considerably less due to the fact that the infrastructure is already in place and/or the utilization of such services is high enough to justify the cost. In Weld County, few communities are positioned to assume this cost as evidenced bythe recent decisions of Greeley, Windsor and Evans to veto this type of facility. 5. Under the growth policies detailed in the Weld County Comprehensive Plan, a proposed., use. Must determined to be consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan. ' New development in the Del Camino area has been reasonably compatible with existing development.. The corridor has been able to support. a variety of commercial. and industrial activities' while minimizing the impacts on agricultural or residential interests. The proposed correction facility seriously compromises the relationship among the interests residing in the area. A. The facility as proposed by The Villa, is unique in that it cannot be categorized under the traditional definitions of industrial or commercial. B. The initial site proposed by The Villa will:require a special use permit since it is proposed in an area designated for.Medium Density Residential (≥' R) and: will be immediately adjacent to..single family 9124 I 1 1 1 dwelling C. Regardless of where the facility is located in the area, impacts on the local residents relative to traffic flows on visitation days, security/fencing, lighting, and construction will be considerable. Consideration relative to the impacts on the individuals and businesses that have made significant property investments must take precedence since many of the investments were made prior to the development of the comprehensive plan in 1987, and subsequently under terms of its adoption. 4. The final decision must reflect a high sensitivity to the wishes of the surrounding community. 5. The county has little or no ability to protect the community from the "associates" of the inmates who visit the facility --many of whom will have criminal records. The exposure the residents and business owners in the area will assume transcends the ability of Weld County to protect their interests. Ultimately, the Commissioners must make a decision that reflects the 'interests of those immediately impacted and all residents of Weld County. Based on the criteria detailed above, I encourage the Planning Commission and the Commissioners to reject any proposal for the construction of a correctional facility in the Del Camino area specifically, and Weld County in general. While I recognize that in the future conditions may warrant a re-examination of this issue, at this time I feel that the best interests of Weld County 'tare served by not approving any business proposal of this nature. Sincerely, Frank M. Canepa ' 303/651-0584 1 9:1249 1 D?CCN:TIES RESPONSE Information Regarding the Proposed PreRelease Center Submitted By: Concerned Citizens of Southwest Weld County -- 'T`^c following information is intended to clarify and detail the Villa at Greeley Inc. responses to the "commonly asked questions concerning the operations of the proposed prison. 'Introduction: 'The State of Colorado has initiated and implemented a variety of. responses to the conditions of overcrowding within state prison facilities. The concept of pre -parole programs and facilities is another response to reduce the financial and facilities burden 'currently endured by the state. The Villa at Greeley has petitioned the Colorado Department of Corrections to build and operate a private prison facility. Under House Bill 90-1327 which authorized the privitization of corrections facilities in Colorado, some specific facts should be 'addressed: A. The preparole prison facility proposed for the Del Camino area (Interstate 25 at Colorado Highway 119) is designed to house ANY ,felonious offender approved for future release by the Board of Parole. The House Bill does not distinguish between violent or non-violent "'offenders. Nor does it preclude any prisoner regardless of the seriousness of their offense or class of felony from being assigned to a "preparole facility". B. The facility may be used to detain ANY parole violator 'until the Department of Corrections acts on the individual's case. The bill does not place any limitations on the time a parole violater nay reside in this facility awaiting disposition of his case. ■■ C. Under the guise of education and personal development, the facility is in fact, a prison with one major exception --prisoners are of confined to a cell with a maximum of two or three offenders. Instead, the facility promotes a dormitory or barracks concept where p to 50 offenders share common facilities and living space under the direct control, in some cases, of a single corrections officer. D. Inmates may reside in this prison for up 180 days (6 I0nths ) E. While health and education services are provided within the facility, prisoners may be transported to local jails when deemed ecessary due to behavior or rules violations. F. This prison will house a high -security area for problem l[risoners. 1 9:1249 Question 4l: What kinds of offenders will be placed in the proposed prison facility? The Department of Corrections classifies each felony coax' --a by a person. These classes are categorized based .on the severity of the offense as:defined under the Colorado_ Revised -Statues (C.R.S.) on a scale of 1 - 6; with 1 (Most Serious) and 6 (Least Serious). __ should be noted that most inamtes are multiple offenders and have exhausted the patience and leniency of the legal system. Those prisoners classified as "violent" will have to be CONVICTED of a violent crime. Our legal system does not provide for "circumstantial evidence" when categorizing prisoners. With court loads, plea bargaining allows a person to admit guilt to a lesser charce and sentence in order to expedite case disposition. In other words, a person originally charged with a violent crime, may have the charges reduced and therefore, would not be classified as violent. A recent report of the Department of Corrections indicates that those remanded to the custody of the state typically serve less than 50% of their original sentence. For a Class 5 or 6 offender, over one-third (>33%) and up to one-half (50%) of their actual time may be served in a "pre -parole" facility. Offenders convicted of violent offenses are eligible for release after completing 75% of their sentence. However, current estimates in a Department of Criminal Justice report, indicates that the average Class 5V (for "violent") offender is expected to serve, on the average, 46.4% of his sentence; while a Class 5 non-violent offender serves an average of 48% of his sentence. The Villa at Greeley states in their response "The prerelease center will serve only those violent offenders who have proven themselves to be neither a management problem nor an escape risk..." The developers have failed to note that those who DO NOT QUALIFY for community corrections (commonly known as "half -way houses") may be assigned to a pre -parole facility, as they require a significantly higher degree of security to protect the community. As stated in the introduction, the Department of Corrections does not preclude ANY inmate --regardless of Class_ of Felony --from being assigned to a preparole prison if they are within 180 .days of release from the corrections system. when addressing individuals who are motivated to escape, again the house bill approves of the use of a preparole prison for holding parole violators until there hearing is held. A parole violator who is facing completion of his unserved sentence has a tremendous amount of motivation to assess his opportunity -for escape. Additionally, a proposal request in 1992 from the Department of Corrections specifically states that certain types of preparole inmates (Track III) are to be segregated and refused contact with other inmates (Tracks I & II). Even within the facility, the state acknowledges degrees of risk among the_inmates. 1 1 1 1 • 9,31249 1 'The - velopers are propc. .ig this facility, and the ,pes of offenders it .__: house, based on the quality of the evaluation system,. to '^- a-ely measure the motivations of the individual to conform to ----or-ea prison behavior. Psychologists tend to,agree.that the human Fsyche is too complex as to accurately categorize and anticipate those factors that influence an individuals behaviors and motivations. Two linzinmum se -4ty prisoners -escaped the weekend of September 24, 1993 from another Colorado facility --the Villa at -Greeley expects the community to embrace their concept that persons who have acted rationally in the past will, within 180 days of release, make a '-dramatic turn towards rationality. -t should be noted that House Bill 90-1327 provides significant 'financial motivation for the preparole prison to assume responsibility for higher risk inmates. For example, the standard "residential rate" for an inmate is $30.00 per day. The Vila is eligible to receive ,$44.00 per day for an offender placed in a "mental health treatment program." 1 Question #2: Will the proposed facility evolve in to a higher type "maximum" security facility? ,While the Villa may not currently have any motivation to upgrade the facility, they are subject to factors well beyond their control. The Villa is a contractor to the State of Colorado and is subject to the "'executive fiat of the Governor and the whims of the state legislature. using the Corrections Corporation of America (CCA) as an example, the 'industry leader in private corrections facilities, they did not achieve profitability until their seventh year of operation. We do not know if the Villa at Greeley has the ability to sustain this 'effort should their estimates prove inaccurate. The community effectively assumes the risk should financial failure occur since the state will have a limited number of options, ncluding: A. Assume operation of the facility (at which time the lkarameters regulating the "quality" of inmates remains solely in the ands of the Department -of Corrections), - Iontrol. B. Find another firm to assume operational and financial C. Close the facility. (This is the least feasible option Iince the Department of Corrections has based their' management and financial requirements on having a specific number of beds vailable.) important factor in evaluating the financial stability of the operation is to evaluate the commercial rating assigned to the bonds 'sed to finance the project. The lower the rating, the higher the isk. The lower the rating, the greater the premium over prime interest rate. The higher the interest rate, the lower the potential Ior profitability and stability. As evidenced by the recent ssessments/recall of all bonds for Castle Pines North in Douglas • County, no one can accurately predict the ongoing viability of revenue fond -funded operations. 91249 Expansion of the Fa^1i-y As part of the option on the purchase of the acreage in the Del Camino area, the Villa at Greeley intends to purchase over 50 acres, Initially, only 20+ acres will be developed for the prison facility. No mention is made regarding plans for the remaining acreage. While the developers state that they are restricted on housing a, higher population in the proposed prison, no mention is made of plansto expand the the current facility or to construct' a second facility on the remaining property. The developers state that the facility is limited in its design for other uses or higher security incarceration. The Department of Corrections has a track record of modifying the use of facilities to suit its requirements. This is especially true in the areas of exceeding rated inmate capacities for facilities or not satisfying basic requirements required by law. The intentions of the DOC and the Villa reflect the current situation --history is an indicator that expediency supercedes promises over time. Question #3: Will offenders from other jurisdictions be released in the Del Camino area upon completion of the prerelease program? The villa at Greeley unequivocally states that no offender will be released into the community unless they originally resided here. In the realm of government there are no absolutes. The Governor, State Legislature, and the Department of Corrections must have the flexibility to respond to changes in our society. While the intentions of all involved are honorable, terms such as "No" and "Never" are not realistic in the 1990's. The Villa at Greeleyis a contractor to the State --the legislature has the power to modify the rules for the operation and treatment of the inmates up to the time they exit the facility. Question #4: Has the basic facility design. been adequately reviewed. in regard to/acceptable security and operational procedures, as well as adherence to all applicable codes and standards? The villa at Greeley Inc. is required by the state to conform to accepted standards. While the facility has been determined to exceed the level of security required for it use, it is not realistic to assume that this or any other facility is truly secure To use an analogy, if a school teacher is unable to maintain classroom control over 25-30 students when a few are disruptive, is it reasonable for a single corrections. officer. to effectively manage up to 50 inmates when only one 6r' a few. are disruptive? . 901249 The Community should not embrace a false sense of security- In the ' -id-1980's, prisoners at the maximum sect ity'faci__ty in New t,exido Ibreached -virtually every "secure" barrier.- This is a facility where inmates were confined to -the r cells for 23 hours per day. Within two hours, cellblocks were in complete control -of the inmates, ',"shatterproof" class barriers were -shattered; those in protective - custody were maimed or murdered, and so on. lie should also reference the maximum -security prison in Atlantawhen in the mid -1980's the prisoners maintained control over the facility for almost a week. In both cases, these prisoners are confined two "almost in a cell, with each cellblock segreated from the other. "The location of the proposed facility puts an escapee within 15 minutes walking time of a major traffic thoroughfare, a recreation and services area dedicated to travelers, and an intersection that is significantly overburdened, as evidenced by the waiting times experienced by vehicles. This intersection is and consistently used by busses transporting children. An inmate intent on -escape can identify an innumerable number of opportunities to hijack a vehicle. ,The barracks type atmosphere proposed by the developers lends itself to "mob tactics" at any time. The developers are relying on the Weld 'County Sheriff's Department, the State Patrol and the Department of Corrections to respond within reasonable time in the event of problems. In the 30-45 minutes it typically takes a deputy to respond, sufficient damage to the facility and loss of control can 'occur. Our deputies and patrolmen are at significant risk as they are not continually trained to deal with this type of situation. ,The Mountain View Fire Protection District relies almost exclusively n volunteers in the Del Camino area for fire protection. In the event of a fire at the facility, is it reasonable: to. expect -community tmembers to risk their well-being both in -terms of the fire itself and he actions of even a single inmate? 1 . he Villa at Greeley Inc. sites Police Chief John Michaels of IWindsor and his research relative to the impact -on local crime after onstruction of this type of facility. Chief Michaels sited four ocations in Texas to support his position. FFief Michaels failed to contact Colorado locations that pursued ison facilities most recently. In the case of Ordway, significant and measurable increases in ' drunk driving and contraband possession e.g. drugs) have been specifically associatedwithvisitors .to the acility. Regardless of how these` offense are categorized, they re incremental burden to law enforcement -and the community. n Limon, the county has had to invest significant amounts of tax in to enhance security at the county courthouse since all activities within the corrections facility that require a hearing or �'vial must be conducted in the county. Obviously, the risk of escape s of real concern. Question #5: What about the risk of escape; or problems with visitors? 9C1249 In a previous presentatic..., the Villaat Greeley sta.ed that dogs would be used in the facility to search for. contraband. It is. no secret that, even in the most .secure .facilities, drugs -and weapons.are-- available to -the inmates from a-variety`of sources --typically provided from the outside. While the developers use -Chief Michaels responses to support their agenda, they readily admit that contraband is an issue that warrants ongoing attention. .If the.contraband is not produced internally, then it reasonable to -assume that a certain percentage of visitors not currently residing in the Del Camino area will be transporting these products. Question #6: Will property values decline? - An equally valid question is:.. Will property values continue to experience the same rate of growth as prior to the construction of a pprison? If a homeowner effectively foregoes appreciation in his roperty values due to the location of a prison, then he has been negatively impacted. The developers continue to reinforce the concept that values will not decline, but continue to evade the issue. that property values may remain static due to the lack of desirability relative to other locations. It is not reasonable, due to the complexity of the issue, to unequivocally state that the prison will not have a negative impact on property values. The Villa at Greeley Inc. continues to site a study conducted in California as the reference for evaluating the impact of prisons on property values. The study cites locations around the State of California, a state with one of the highest costs of living (centered around housing) and now experiencing one of the greatest declines in housing values (upwards of 30% in certain areas) due to changes in the economic base and the level of crime. California has some of the highest population densities in the country and does not correlate with Colorado. Again, the developers should look a little closer to home. In an article published within the last year, an analysis. of the economic issues associated with PRISONS IN COLORADO, the economic benefits anticipated by communities were not achieved. Prison employees, based on their incomes, typically pursue housing in the range of $70,000-$80,000. If this is true for the Del Camino prison, then employees will have to commute significantdistancesdue to the lack of available housing. In Ordway, only two spec homes where constructed, as builders realized the expected demand for housing failed to materialize. In a statement by a prison official who asked to.anonymous (according to the publication)states "It's a. false premise to say prisons represent and economic boom unless you have places .for employees to live and no major metro_area less than one hour away." If we apply this statement to the Del Camino prison, then the community will not experience the economic benefits anticipated by the:,proponents. 1 I 1 921249 Those who expect local businesses to benefit should sake note of a statement from Bill Tripp of the Department of Corrections: "People Idon't understand that the state purchasing system is a bid process... It's not like we say we have to buy S200,000 worth of food to feed our inmates and we're going to go down to the local grocery store. Some people don't understand that." Under the same premise, 1 procurements go to the lowest cost provider. If local businesses cannot compete with the larger providers around the state, they will see the dollars continue to flow outside the community. Again, using Ordway as an example. Of the 334 jobs in the new prison, only 60-70 local residents were hired. The majority of prison employees (upwards of 60%) commute 4S miles from Pueblo. Extrapolating this data to the Del Camino prison, Boulder, Adams, and Larimer counties will see the most benefit while assuming little or none of the risk. CLOSING The research included in this document is publicly available. It ',The includes the House Bill 90-1327, an initial Request for Proposal from lithe Department of Corrections for a Preparole Facility, reports from the Department of Corrections, and various magazine articles. The objective is to continue to provide the community, zoning 'authority and Weld County commissioners with additional facts and perspectives on the topics of economic benefits and risks associated with the construction of prison facilities. i 901249 TEL:303-825-429S Oct OS 93 9:S0 No.007 P.02 TESTThIONY TO WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION IN OPPOSTT1ON TO TIE PAE-PAROL FACILITY IN TICS DEL CA INO AREA - SOUTHWEST WELD COUNTY - Prepared by Dale McCall 13715 Elmore Road Longswnt. CO 80504 776-4365 I urge the Weld County Planning Commission to recommend denial of the request to build and operate a Pze Parol facility in Southwest Weld County. As a citizen and a member of the St. Vrain Valley School Dtstrlct, I strongly oppose this proposed action. I am speaking as an individual, not as a formal representative of the St. Vrain Valley School Board of Education. The Board; as a whole, has not taken official action. I strongly oppose the proposed facility based upon the following: 1. I do not believe this b the type of Industry that the public in the area will support. • 2. I believe that the metro areas that generate the large number of prisoners need to house those prisoners in their metro area - not our area. 3. I am very concerned about the safety of the children in our nearby schools, Le., FrederickBlenentary, Prodctiek Junior and Senior High Schools. 4. In addition. lam very concerned about the safety of the school children that are bused through the intersection at Interstate 25 and Highway 119. Currently, two buses in the morning and two buses in the afternoon travel through that intersection. CA total of 150200 students each day.) In conclusion, I strongly oppose this facility in Southwest Weld County. It does not fit within the values and expectations of the people that live and work in our community. The community did not request nor do they support this type of industry. SC1249 1. 1 1 1 i 1 HOUSE BILL 90-1327. . BY REPRESENTATIVES Neale, Chiouber, Reeves, Arveschoug, Foster, Grampsas, Romero, Jerke, Johnson, Jones, Pankey, Philips, Ratterree, Ruddick, Taylor -Little, J. Trujillo, Ulvang, and K. Williams; also SENATORS Wham, Norton, L. Trujillo, Allison, Bird, Bishop, DeNier, Fenlon, Hopper, Martinez, McCormick, Pastore, Rizzuto, Strickland, and Traylor. CONCERNING A PLAN TO ADDRESS PROBLEMS RELATED TO THE CRIMINAL % JUSTICE SYSTEM, AND, . IN CONNECTION THEREWITH, i IMPLEMENTING MEASURES TO REDUCE PRISON OVERCROWDING, AND ' MAKING AN APPROPRIATION THEREFOR. Be it enacted Lix the General Assembly of the State of Colorado: SECTION 1. Designation of correctional facilities - construction authorized: (1) In addition to the facilities authorized in section 2 of this act, the department .of corrections is hereby authorized and directed to provide for the construction of the following additional correctional facilities: ' (a) A five hundred bed close facility in Canon City; (b) A one hundred sixty bed women's facility adjacent to the Denver regional diagnostic center; and (c) A warehouse facility to serve the Buena Vista correctional facility and the boot camp to be located in Chaffee county. SECTION 2. Designation of correctional facilities - recommendations of capital development committee. (1) The capital development committee, in accordance with 'the provisions of section 3 of chapter 3, Session Laws of Colorado 1989, First Extraordinary Session, as amended by Senate Bill Capital letters indicate new material added to existing statutes; dashes through words indicate deletions from existing statutes and .., __. ___. _� ..� 9.+1249 1 1 i .1 1 1 90-172, enacted at the Second RegularSession ofthe Fifty -Seventh General Assembly, hereby reeonrnend$. in. addition to the construction ' recommendations contained in' the committee's 1990 annual report to the general assembly. and the general assembly hereby designates, the following: sites and security levels for the construction of four additional correctional facilities. not necessarily in the following order: (a) One medium security correctional facility at Sterling. Colorado; (b) One medium or maximum security correctional facility at Canon City, Colorado; (c) One minimum security correctional facility at Trinidad. Colorado; and (d) ;One minimum security. facility in Chaffee. County, Colorado. . SECTION 3. 24-35-210 (1) (f) (I) (C). Colorado Revised Statutes, 1988 Repl. Vol., is amended, and the said 24-35-210 (1) (f) (I) is further amended BY THE ADDITION OF A, NEW SUB-SUBPARAGRAPH,•to read: 24-35-210. Lottery fund.' (1) (f) (I) (C) A:diagnostic correctional facility providing•: for approximately three hundred thirty-six beds to be located at or inthe environs of Denver, Colorado: and (C.5) A two hundred fifty bed special needs unit on the campus of the Colorado state hospital in Pueblo'. and a boot camp in Chaffee county, Colorado. which boot camp shall be used for the regimented inmate' discipline and treatment program established in House Bill 90-1023, enacted at the Second Regular Session of the Fifty-seventh General Assembly. The total cost of the acquisition of the special needs unit and the boot camp shall not exceed twenty-six million dollars. exclusive of financing costs and capitalized interest; and SECTION 4. Title 17, Colorado Revised Statutes, 1986 Repl. Vol., as amended, is amendedBYTHE ADDITION OF A NEW ARTICLE to read: ARTICLE -26.5 - Multi -jurisdictional Jails 17-26.5-101. Multi -jurisdictional jails authorized. The general assembly hereby authorizes any county, city and county, city,. or the department of corrections' of the state of Colorado to enter into a contract or contracts with each other PAGE 2 -HOUSE BILL 90-1327 • • • 9µ1249s:. . in accordance with part 2 of article 1 of title 29, C.R.S., to design, locate: construct, and:operate a., multi -Jurisdictional -jail -for the- .incarceration of. county... city -and -county, city, or state :prisoners. In the .alternative. the: described governmental entitles may enter-into,the necessary contracts with a private contractor for•the_provisionand operation of such jail. 17-26.5-102. Contracts for multi -jurisdictional jails - requirements. (1) Any contract or contracts for the creation of a multi -jurisdictional jall..as described in section 17-26.5-101 shall contain the following requirements: (a) An agreement regarding .involvement by each -of the governmental entities in the predestgn planning, design, location, and construction of such .a jail facility or involvement in any agreement to -obtain a -private contractor to provide a jail facility and the operation thereof. (b) An agreement regarding involvement by each of the governmental entities in construction management and oversight for such a jail facility. (c) An agreement regarding involvement by each of:the governmental -entitles in financing the, construction of such a jail facility. • (d) An agreement. regarding involvement by each of the governmental entities In financing and providing for staffing and operation of such jail facility, which may provide for staffing and operation solely by any county, city and county, or city with financial assistance from the state department of corrections or any other:.'governmental- entity involved, or staffing and operation through a:joi:nt.staffing and operation agreement between any county..City and county, or city and the state -department of corrections, if the.department is involved in the multi.jurisdictionaljail facility. (e) An agreement regarding involvement by -each -of the governmental entities in financing and providing for programs for such jail facility. (f) An agreement regarding utilization of such jail facility by each of the governmental entities involved in the multi -jurisdictional jail facility. However, ,if the state department of corrections is involved in the facility, such agreement shall provide thata:proportionate number of beds in the facility, equal to the proportionate percentage of the financing of the construction and operation• of the facility which was provided by the -estate department of, corrections bears to the entire cost of --the construction and operation of they facility, -shall be reserved;for;utilization-by the state PAGE 3 -HOUSE 8111 90-1327 1 1 1 I I 1 1 i 92124_.- . .rwd.,'��•. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 department of corrections if such beds,, are needed by 'the department. Any -such beds so reserved.shall be counted by the department as available beds when_determining the number of beds available An the state correctional, system. SECTION 5.. 17-1-103 (1). Colorado Revised Statutes. 1986 Repl. Vol., as amended, is amended BY THE ADDITION OF A NEW PARAGRAPH to read:. 17-1-103.Duties'director. ) (j) Subject to available appropriations, to enter into con tracts for the .construction. staffing. -operation, and utilization of multi -jurisdictional jails pursuant to article 26.5 of this title. SECTION 6. Authorization to enter into multi -jurisdictional sail agreements. The department of corrections is hereby authorized and directed to enter into an intergovernmental agreement or agreements. utillzafforn r the he construction. % staffing. ies ursuant to article 26.5. Cmulti-uisdictionaf ailoloradorRevised Statutes.faSuch cilitagreement or agreements shall be entered' into as soon as for utilization of any multi- possible jurisdictionaljail facilits y and shall vatthe earliest possible Bete. SECTION 7. 16-11-201, Colorado Revised Statutes. 1986 Repl. Vol.. is amended BY THE. ADDITION. OF A, NEW SUBSECTION to read: 16-11-201. Application for probation. (4) The restrictions upon eligibility for probation In subsection (2) of this section may be waived by the sentencing court district9 attorney articular and defendantupon of�such�recoendation fthe a ommendationbyan order of the sentencing court. Upon regarding of an particular er pursuant to . this subsection (4) 9 9 defendant, such defendant shall be deemed to be eligible to apply to the court for probation pursuant to this section. SECTION 8. 42-2-206 (1), Colorado Revised Statutes, 1984 Repl. Vol.. as amended, is amended to read: 42-2-206. Driving after revocation prohibited. (1) It is unlawful for any person to operate any motor., vehicle in this state while the revocation of the department prohibiting the habitual oion ffender, remains offender,who�effect.person is thereafter convicted of operating a motor f the departmentC1 prohibiting such operation revocation is ineffect,isoguilty of a and shall be punished as providedinfsectt n�18-1-105,SS NhC.R.S. except -Oat -a -minimum PAGE 4 -HOUSE BILL 90-1327 is ;.. 93124.1E :.2 si@nten6e-t0-4Mpp4sonmeRt-sha44-be-mandatepy.---No--Pert4on--of uch--sentenc@ -May--be--suspendedr-and--no--pwebat;on-May-be yraatedvvexsepf "thaw-7.4n-a--4ase---where---the---defendant estab44shes--that--he--pad--te--dr4ve--the-=metep--vehic4e--4n v4eiation-of-th4s-subsection-(14.-because-oE-an-eMergenoy,--the mandateay--priseR--sentence-May-Rot-appiyrevrwhere-the-judge makes--sped4646--wviiten--findings--which--detail•---spe44f44 Miiigating--c4rcuMstances--in-she-rece$4-ihat-support-a-Sesser sentence•-the-Mandatory-prison-sentence--and--ihe--proh4b4t4on-. against-ihe-granting-eE-probation-sha44-mot-apply. - SECTION 9. Article 2 of title 17, Colorado Revised Statutes, 1986-Repl: Vol., as amended, is amended BY THE ADDITION OF A NEW PART to read: PART 4 PREPAROLE FACILITIES_AND PROGRAMS 17-2-401. Definitions. As used in:this part 4, unless: the context otherwise requires: (1) "Inmate".,"for the purposes of ,'placing such inmate within a preparole facility or program, means a person sentenced to the department of corrections. (2) "Preparole facility or program". means a secure facility or program which meets the following criteria: •(a) The facility or-- program is operated. by the department or by a contractual agreement between the department and a unit of local government, a private nonprofit agency or organization, or any corporation, association, or labor organization: (b) The facility or_program provides secure residential beds ,to'any'inmate\wiio 1s within nlnetrdays of:the-date:upo which it has been determined that 'he _will=-be_paroled— e -released, or ;to ,:a"frar'• an alternative'to regression .from -a community corrections`•facllity.. or to any parolee req4) (a)1,irig ornas atconditionmited toftion modifieduant to. parole asction determinedl03 by the state board of parole. The general assembly hereby declares that it intends that every -effort community corrections programs to the fullest to extent possible. (c) The facility or program provides- in -residence programs' and services to instruct such inmates in obtaining and holding regular employment, in the process of enrolling in and maintaining academic courses and vocational training programs, in utilizing the resources of the community. after release in meeting their personal_ and family. needs and responsibilities, in providing approprlafe in -residence PAGE 5 -HOUSE BILL 90-1327 1 1 1 1 1 1 treatment;.' and -in participating: -in whatever, tn-residences specialized programs are available within the community in 4 which such facility or program is located. (d) The local community corrections board created pursuant to article 27 of this title has granted approval to locate the facility, or program withinthe jurisdiction of such board. Nothing in.this paragraph (d) shall be construed to interfere with the'operation of any local ordinances involving the zoning of, and siting of, correctional facilities within the jurisdiction of any unit of local government. (3) "Secure residential beds" means beds in a facility which has lockable doors and windows; and which has a method to detect and respond to any unauthorized entrance or exit by any inmate, parolee, or other person; and which has twenty -four-hour staffing sufficient to monitor inmates and parolees; and which has a secure external perimeter. 17-2-402. Authority of the department to operate or to contract for preparole facilities and programs. (1) The executive director. after a competitive process, may operate or contract for the provision of preparole facilities and programs with a unit of local government, a private nonprofit agency or organization, or any corporation, association, or labor organization. However, in no case'shall`an inmate spend •morr- than' one-chundred' eighty "days': in such a facility or program. (2) The executive director shall have the power to establish and enforced all preparole facilities or programs operated-bya aunits or of local government or a nongovernmental agency with which the 'department contracts for services. 17-2-403. .Escape from custody. If an inmate or parolee fails to remain within the extended limits of his confinement, he shall be deemed to have escaped from custody and shall, upon 18-8-208, 1 C.R.S., and all breductions in sentence punished as edin section authorized by part 2 of article 22.5 of this title shall be forfeited for offenders sentenced for crimes committed prior to July 1. 1979. 17-2-404. Report to general assembly. On or before January 1, 1992; the executive director of the department of corrections shall present a written report to the general assembly regarding the operation'of preparole facilities and programs throughout the state. SuCh report shall include information on the number and type of. such facilities, the effectiveness of preparole programs, any problems with such programs generally, and any problems- encountered '.within, the. PAGE 6 -HOUSE BILL 90-1327 1 921249'°: communities -in which:such preparole facilities or programs. -are located. 17-2-405. Repeal of eart. This part 4 is repealed, effective July 1, 1992. SECTION 10. Authorization to 'contract for preparole beds. The executive director of -the department of corrections Ts hereby authorized to enter into a.contract_or contracts, after a competitive process, and after an approved request for proposal process pursuant to section ,17-2-402.. Colorado Revised Statutes, for up to three hundred beds in preparole facilities or programs at not more than forty-four dollars per day per. bed. Such facilities and programs shall be contracted for and utilized as soon as possible after the effective. date of this act. SECTION 11. Expansion of programs authorized. The department of -ty is hereby authorized and•;. directed to expand diversion programs for offenders in accordance with A plan for such expansion formulated by the department of public safety. and through a competitive process for providers of such services. SECTION 12, Expansion of community corrections incentives for expansion. (1)y The department of public safety, after a competitive process. is hereby_ authorized. and directed to "provide,incentives"for,an'i ncreaseTin.the`oumtier of_.;community: correctional-fa`cilities"afidprograms' available to be utilized by offenders by;.lncreasing-the "per -diem" amount for such facilities and programs pursuant to subsection (2) of this section and providing other incentives for starting up such facilities and programs, including„ start'=upjnterest-free roans"1n any.amount up:to sixtj thousand dollars to assist in the establishment of community corrections programs. (2) The general assembly hereby directs that. the "per diem" amount for community correctional facilities and programs shall not exceed: (a) An average of thirty dollars per day for offenders in standard residential placements (b) An average of thirty-five dollars per day for offenders in specialized release preparation centers: and • (c) An average of forty-four dollars per day for, offenders placed in inpatient substance abuse; or mental health. . treatment programs. SECTION 13. 'Article 1 of : title 17, Colorado .Revised Statutes, .-1986 .Rep1. Vol., -as :amended,. is..amended.BY.THE 1 1 I 1 1 I PAGE 7 -HOUSE BILL 90-1327 ADDITION OF.A NEW SECTION to read: 17-1-114. Pool of funds - continuance of community fund tosbenknown hase the is hecommunity reby tesupervisionatsupplemental fund, which shall consist of .moneys appropriated by the general assembly. ;All moneys In the fund shall be subject to withdrawal by the department of corrections, the judicial department, or the department of public safety for the purpose of n, such as parole supervision, n9 probation ysupervision.ocommunity corrections programs, or home electronic monitoring over offenders who would otherwise be removed to secure custody due to lack of resources.'. Such moneys may be withdrawn upon a request by the department of corrections, the judicial department•, or the department of blic safety which is made: to the director of the office of fp�uate pTan g and budgeting. The director of the office ot�state planning and budgeting, in consultation with the joint :60M -co ittee. shall approve or disapprove the request made by each department and budget the amount of such request. Any withdrawal approved by the director of the office of state planning and budgeting shall be dispersed to the department making the request. SECTION 14. 24-37-103 (1)., Colorado Revised Statutes, 1988 Repl. Vol., is•amended BY THE ADDITION OF A NEW PARAGRAPH to read: 24-37-103. Director . - duties. (1) (e) Approve or disapprove, afterconsultation with the joint budget committee, requests for moneys from the community supervision supplemental fund created pursuant to section 17-1-114, C.R.S. SECTION 15...17-2-103 (4) (a), Colorado Revised Statutes, 1986 Repl. Vol.', is amended to read: 17-2-103. Arrest of parolee - revocation proceedings. (4) (a) If, rather than issuing a summons, a parole officer makes an arrest of a parolee, with or without a warrant, or the parolee. is otherwise arrested,Sthe:paroieecshall bCheld it a county' jail ,OR A'.PREPAROLE "FACILIT`!_' OR—" PROGRAM pending action by the parole officer pursuant to subsection (5) of this section. SECTION 16. Part 1 of article 11 of title 16, Colorado Revised Statutes, 1986 Repl. Vol.. as amended, is amended BY THE ADDITION OF A NEW SECTION to read: 16-11-102.5. Drug 'testing of offenders by judicial department - pilot program. (1) The judicial department is haerpilotuthorized program and fordirecd tothetedrug atestingaevelossoon as possible of persons during PAGE 8 -HOUSE BILL 90-1327• L 9u1249..• presentence investigation and shall include testing of investigation.and include offender- is assigned to rehabilitation programs. on_, probation. _Such_ program persons` " during presentence random drug testing when. an specialized- treatment and (2) On or before January 1, 1992. the judicial department shall submit a written. report to the general assembly regarding the effectiveness of the pilot program established pursuant to subsection (1) of this section. Such report shall include statistics on the. number of persons tested, the percentage of offenders wh6 tested positive for drug use, and a report on the overall effectiveness of the pilot program, the success of the specialized treatment and rehabilitation programs, and information concerning whether any increase or decrease in .probation revocations can be identified due to the pilot program. SECTION 17. 18-1.5-101 (1), Colorado Revised Statutes, 1986 Repl:• Vol„ as amended, is REPEALED AND REENACTED. WITH AMENDMENTS, to read: 18-1.5-101. Criminal justice commission -• creation. (1) (a) In order to provide legislative overview of and a study of the criminal justice system inthis state and to develop recommendations for legislation improving the criminal justice system, there is hereby created in the department of public safety the criminal justice commission, referred to in this article as the "commission". The commission shall consist of the following nineteen members: Five members of the house of representatives. three of whom shall be appointed by the speaker of the house of representatives, and two of whom shall be appointed by the minority leader of the house of representatives; five members of the senate, three of whom shall be appointed. by the president of the senate, and two of whom shall be appointed by the minority leader of the senate; and nine members appointed by the governor. Of the nine members appointed by, the governor, no more. than five shall be from the same major political party. The nine members appointed by the governor shall not be members of the general assembly. and they shall be chosen from among the following groups: District attorneys; chiefs .of police, the county sheriffs. community corrections, juvenile community corrections. public defenders, victims rights organizations. citizens' correctional- reformgroups, and at -large citizens. • (b) The commission shall choose a chairman and vice-chairman from among its members and may establish such • organizational and procedural rules as are necessary. (c). The commission may -create subcommittees which. may consist,. in part, of. persons` who are_ not members of the PAGE 9 -HOUSE BILL 90-1327 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 siz4t. 1 i 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 .1 commission, and such persons may =have a . vote on - such subcommittee butshall not have any vote at a meeting of the whole commission, . (d) Any subcommittee created by the commission pursuant to paragraph (c) of this subsection (1) may include, but shall not be limited to. members representing the departments of corrections, public safety, or institutions, the state board of parole, the .attorney - general, the judicial department, district attorneys, chiefs of po'T•ice, the county sheriffs, community corrections,' public defenders, a victims' rights organization, and a citizens' correctional'reform group. SECTION 18. 18-1.5-102 (1), Colorado Revised Statutes. 1986 Repl. Vol., as amended, is amended BY THE ADDITION OF THE FOLLOWING NEW PARAGRAPHS to read: 18-1.5-102. Criminal justice commission - duties. (1) (1) Study and make recommendations concerning the development of cooperative programs or policies -with the aim of better utilizing.scarce resources to fight drug abuse in the criminal justice system; (m) Study and make recommendations concerning the reduction of drug use by offenders at all levels of the Criminal justice system; (n) Study and make 'recommendations concerning sanctions and treatment for the use of drugs by an offender while such offender is under the supervision of the criminal justice. system; (o) Study and make recommendations concerning the development of programs which improve the cost benefit ratio of offender sanctions or, treatment programs and the recommendation of the elimination of programs which are not successful or are duplicative of other programs within- the criminal justice system; (p) Study and make recommendations concerning the reduction of recidivism among offenders leaving the supervision of the criminal justice system; and (q) At the request of the capital development committee, share with the committee its preliminary findings and recommendations concerning proposed sentencing modifications designed to alleviate the need for additional capital construction projects and to alleviate the impact of overcrowding on the county jails without endangering the welfare and safety of the public. The capital development committee shall consider the preliminary recommendations of the criminal justice commission in. deliberations . concerning PAGE 10 -HOUSE BILL 90-1327 recommendations for.for.capaclty needs in the correctional system.._, SECTION 19. Article 22.5 of title 17, Colorado -Revised Statutes, 1986 Repl. Vol., as amended, is amended BY THE ADDITION OF A NEW PART to:read: PART 4. PAROLE -ELIGIBILITY AND DISCHARGE FROM -CUSTODY 17-22.5-401. Legislative declaration. The general_ assembly hereby declares that if any inmate does not demonstrate positive behavior during incarceration, such inmate should be required to serve' out the full sentence imposed' upon such inmate. If yany innate does demonstrate' .positive.behavior during incarceration,'such inmate should be considered" for release from incarceration' prior to the end'of 'the':full-sentence imposedupori him. Therefore, the general assembly, -in enacting this .part 4, intends to provide standards ;whereby any ;inmate can earn, a•: reduction of incarceration t9me and to provide incentives for inmates to demonstrate positive behavior during incarceration. 17-22.5-402. Discharge from custody. (1). No inmate shall be discharged from the department until he has remained the full term for which he was sentenced, to be computed on and after the date upon which the sentence becomes effective and excluding any time the inmatemay-have been at large by reason of escape therefrom, unless he is pardoned or otherwise released by legal authority. (2) Notwithstanding subsection (1) of this section, the full term for which an inmate is_sentenced shall be reduced by any earned time granted pursuant .to. section 17-22.5-405, except as provided in sectlon,17-22.5-403 (3). (3) This 'part 4 shall not, apply to any offender to whom section 17-22.5-104 (2) applies. 17-22.5-403: Parole eligibility. (1) Any_ person sentenced for -a claw 2. Class 3, class'4;'clasi'5 or: ddss 6? YeJonyJ+ shall be eligible for parole after.be:•has,.served-,flfty per"cent.cofsthc' Zsentence, imposed" upon Him,' less"any time authorized - for- earned time :granted pursuant to section 17-22.5-405. However, .the date.established-by this subsection (1) upon which any person shall be eligible for parole may be extended•, by the executive director for misconduct during incarceration. The executive director -shall promulgate rules and regulations concerning when and under what conditions any inmates parole eligibility date may be extended. Such rules and regulations -shall .-be..promulgated.in such a manner as to promote -fairness and consistency in --the treatment _of All PAGE 11 -HOUSE BILL 90-1327 I I I I 1 I I i I I I 4!: 92149'. I 11 I 1 1 1 inmates. (2) Notwithstanding subsection (1) of this section, -any person convicted and sentenced for second degree murder, first degree assault, first degree, kidnapping unless the` first degree, kidnapping is a class 1 felony, first or second degree sexual assault; first degree arson, first degree burglary, or aggravated robbery, which person has previously been convicted of a crime. which would have 'been a crime of violence'as defined in section 16-11-309; C.R.S., shall be eligible for parole after he -has 'served seventy-five- percent of the sentence imposed upon him, less any time authorized for earned time granted pursuant to section 17-22.5-405. (3) Notwithstanding subsection "(1) or (2) of this section,any person convicted :and, sentenced for any crime enumerated in subsection (2) of thlc section, whohas twice previously been convicted for a crime which would have been a Crime of violence as defined 'in section 16-11-309, C.R.S., shall be eligible for parole after he has served seventy-five percent of the sentence Served upon him, at which time he shall be referred by the department to the state board of parole which may place such person on parole for a period of time which does not exceed the time remaining on such person's original sentence. Section 17-22.5-402 (2) shall not apply to any such offender... (4) The governor may grant parole to an inmate towhom subsection (2) or (3) of this'section applies prior to such inmate's parole eligibility date or discharge date if, in the governor's opinion, extraordinary mitigating circumstances exist and such inmate'srelease from institutional custody is compatible with the safety and welfare of society. (5) Upon application for parole, the state board of parole, working in conjunction with the department and using the guidelines established pursuant to section 17-22.5-404. shall determine whether or• not to grant parole and, if granted, the length of the period of parole. The state board of parole may set the length of the period of parole for any time period up to the date of final discharge as determined in accordance with section 17-22.5-402. If an application for. parole is refused by the state board of parole, the state board of parole shall reconsider within one year thereafter whether such inmate should be granted parole.- The state board of parole shall -continue such reconsideration each year thereafter until such inmate is granted parole-or.until he is discharged pursuant to. law. (6) For .persons _who are granted parole pursuant -to subsection. (5),of,this,section, the division of -adult serviceS' shall provide parole supervision and -'assistance in securing PAGE 12 -HOUSE BILL 90-1321 921249 921249 --.: employment. housing, and such other services as may affect the successful reintegration -of-such offender into the community while recognizing the need for public safety. Thee Conditions for- parole for any such offender under this subsection (6) '• shall be established.pursuant••to section 17-22.5-404 by the state board of parole prior to such offender's release from 'incarceration." Upon a determination that the conditions of parole have :been violated in a parole revocation proceeding, the state board of paroleshall continue the parole in effect, modify the conditions of parole if "circumstances then shown to exist require such modifications, which. circumstances shall be set forth in writing,,. or revoke the parole and orderthe return of the offender to a place of confinement designated by the executive director for any period of time up to the period remaining on such person's --sentence until the discharge date as determined by section 17-22.5-402 or one. year, whichever is longer. In computing the period of reincarceration, the time between the offender's release on parole and the revocation of such parole shall not be considered to be part of the term of the sentence. Th'e state board of parole may discharge an offender granted parole under this section at any time during the term of parole upon a determination that the offender has been sufficiently rehabilitated and reintegrated into society and can no longer benefit from parole supervision. 17-22.5-404. Parole guidelines. (1) As to any person sentenced for a class 2. class 3, class 4, class 5, or class 6 felony who is eligible for parole pursuant to section 17-22.5-403, the board may consider all applications for parole, as well as all personsto be supervised -under any interstate compact. and may parole any person who is sentenced or committed to a correctional facility when the board determines, by using the guidelines established by this section, that -there is a strong and reasonable probability that the person will not thereafter violate the law and that his release from institutional custody is compatible with the welfare of society. The board' shall first consider the risllf of violence to'th public'tnaever release"Eetislon it"makes., (2) (a) -In, considering offenders for parole, the board shall consider, but need not -be limited to, -the following factors: (I) The testimony of, the victim of the crime or'a relative -of the victim, -1f -the victim has died, pursuant to section 17-22.5-106; (II) The offender's conduct which would indicate whether he has fins ia1_lriaiwed�aT1 of.Zthe-rules,and_regulat ikif t tiro initititlonIir�facility'inwhich fie has been confined and has faithfully performed the., dutiesassigned-to him,; PAGE 13 -HOUSE BILL 90-1327 1 1 1 .1 .1 1 ;• 9431249 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 (III) The: offender's demonstration of`good faith efforts-` to make restitution to the victim of his conduct for the actual damages that were sustained, pursuant to section 17-2-201 (5) (c):• ,. (IV) The offender's demonstrationof good faith efforts to _pay reasonable, costs of parole supervision pursuant to section 17-2-201 (5) (b); (V) The offender's demonstration of good faith efforts to devote time to a specific employment or occupation:. (VI) The offender's good faith efforts to enroll in a school, college, university, or course of vocational— or technical training designed to fit the student for gainful employment; (VII) Whether the offender has diligently attempted but has 'been unable to obtain employment that provides the offender sufficient,.. income. whether the offender has an employment handicap, or whether the offender's age prevents him from obtaining employment; (VIII) The offender's demonstration of good faith efforts to remain within prescribed geographical boundaries and notify the courc"or the parole officer of any change in the. of fender's address or employment: (IX) The offender's demonstration of good faith efforts to report as directed to the parole -officer; (X) The offender's demonstration of good faith efforts to participate in some type of community service work; (XI) The offender has not harassed the victim either verbally or in writing; (XII) The offender's demonstration of good faith efforts to provide support..inctuding any court -ordered child support. for any minor children; (XIII) The offender's participation in the literacy corrections programs. (b) Nothing inthis subsection (2) shall preclude the board from considering factors. other 'than those stated in paragraph (a) of this. subsection (2) when' Considering - applicants for parole. (3) (a) The'. board shall consider the following extraordinary aggravating .circumstances'when determining -the conditions for parole and length of parole supervision when PAGE 14 -HOUSE BILL 90-1327 a" 1 9212491T- such- aggravating_ circumstances show that an offender has a high risk: of recidivism or a high risk of violence: (I) The crime involved serious bodily injury, threat of serious bodily injury, or other acts disclosing -a high degree of cruelty,. viciousness, or callousness. (II) The offender was armed with or used a deadly weapon at the time of.the commission of the offense. (III) -The offenseinvolved multiple victims. (IV) The victim was particularly vulnerable due to advanced age, disability.. 111 health, or extreme youth. (V) The offender's conduct was .directed at an active officer of the court or at an active or former judicial officer, prosecuting, attorney, defense attorney, peace officer, correctional employee, or fireman during or because of the exercise -of -his official duties. (VI) The offender induced others to participate in the commission of the offense or occupied a position of leadership or dominance. of other participants in its commission. (VII) The Offender took.advnntage of a position of trust or confidence to commit the offense. (VIII) The offender committed the offense pursuant to an agreement that he either pay or'be paid for its commission. (IX) The circumstances surrounding the offense indicate that the crime.was-carried out following substantial planning and deliberation. (X)� The 'object of the crime was -to acquire or _ to dltaln tontrbla'controlled'substance.or%other item or material; the possession of whichis illegal. (XI) The offender has engaged in a pattern of violent conduct which indicates a serious danger to society. (XII) The offender was on parole or on probation for another felony when he committed the offense. (XIII). The. offender. wascharged with or was'on bond' for a previous-felonywhen he'committed the --offense, and for'which previous felony he was subsequently convicted. (XIV)- The offender.was under confinement in prison or in any correctional institution within this state as a convicted felon,., or was an escapee ` from .any correctional. institution PAGE 15 -HOUSE 8111 90-1327 I 93124.7 I I I I i I I I I 1 1 i I 1 within this state or another state' when he'committed the offense. (Xv) The offender has numerous or: increasingly serious convictions as an adult or adjudications of delinquency as a juvenile.' "" (b) Nothing' 1n this subsection (3) shall preclude the board from considering, aggravating circumstances other than those stated 1n paragraph (a) of this subsection 1(3) when considering applicants for parole. (4) (a) The board shall consider the' following extraordinary mitigating Circumstances- when determining the conditions 'for parole and length -of parole supervision which show that an offender has a low risk of recidivism or a `low risk of violence: (I) The offender was a -passive participant or played a minor role in•the commission of the offense. (II) The victim was an initiator, willing participant, aggressor, or provoker of the incident. (III) Substantial grounds -exist tending to excuse or justify the offendet's Conduct, -though failing to establish a defense. (IV) -The offender committed the- crime under duress, coercion, threat, or compulsion, insufficient to constitute a complete defense but which significantly affected his -conduct. (V) The offender has no history of prior delinquency or criminal activity or has led a law-abiding life for ---a substantial period of time prior to the commission of the offense. i (VI) The offender voluntarily acknowledges wrongdoing or - evidences remorse or penitence for his criminal conduct. (VII) -The offender is responsible for the maintenance or financial support of others and.,,to avoid undue hardship 'to' his dependents, a - shorter: period of incarceration is warranted. (VIII) Rehabilitation of the offender would be --enhanced by imposing a shorter period of.incarceration. (IX), Before the parole hearing,': the 'offender compensated, -or made a. good. faith' effort to .compensate, the victim of the criminal conduct" for. any ,damage or injury sustained. PAGE 16 -HOUSE BILL 90-1327 9x1249 (b), Nothing-ln.this.subsectio.n (4) _shall preclude the board from considering mitigaingcsubsection (4) when ' circumstances cother than those stated in paragraph (a) of thconsidering applicants for?parole. (5) The division of adult services shall develop a form incorporating the guidelines set forth in subsections (21, -(3), and (4) of this section, which form shall beiuused oby the the members of the'board when considering each app parole. Such form .shall be accompanied by the parolee's' arrest record. Such form shall. be mf►de....iCYa?).able._LA_.any7 r of, ethe pub UC who requests it: (6) In addition to the guidelines contained in subsections (2), (3), and (4) of this section, the division of criminal justice In the department of public safety shall devlop by- theestate board iof parole inve parole ievaluating teria h inmates shall lsfor, parole. Such criteria shall be subject to the approval of the Colorado commission-, on ,.paroleguidelines established pursuant to subsection (7) of' this section and the general assembly by bill in the next regular session of the general assembly following approval by the commission on oarole guidelines. As used in this subsection (6), "objective parole criteria" means the criteria which statistically have been shown to be good predictors of risk to society of release on.parole. (7) (a) There is hereby established in the department of public o commission shall consistof�the5Sion on parole guidelines. Theshall serve as chairperson. the executive director of the department of public safety, the executive director of the department of corrections, the chairperson of the state board of parole. the chairperson pf a community` corrections boa,acipirole officer, a law'enforcement officer, and a private The latter four members shall be appointed by the governor and confirmed by the senate. The director of the division of criminal justice of the department of, public safety shall serve as an ex officio member of the commission. (b) The commission established pursuant to ,this subsection (7) shall have the _ power to approve jettive parole Criteria,. as defined in'subsection (6) of veil b which are developed by the division of criminal justice. 17-22.5-405. Earnemonthtime.. .nc Earned time. Taro, 4.44 t II exceedziemiSre for each, month nf; incarceration or parole. may 1M^� be deducted from the inmate's sentence upon.aedeiolstraty demonstration the department ' by. age ' inmate. ` inmate's case. manager or parole officer. that he has made consistent progress ini the following categories as required' by II department of corrections: M•M.� PAGE 17 -HOUSE BILL 90-1327 Seri.6j 9.01249 :I' 1 I I I I i I i I I I I i I I 14 is,. t�1 Mp (4) Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, earned time may not reduce the- sentence of. any ,inmate as l, ;000013 defined in section 17-22.5-402 (1•) -by a period of time which is more than twenty-five percent of the sentence. Ildi 44"Pli 18 -HOUSE BILL 90-1327 ��t j (a) Work and tratning,.includtng attendance; promptness, performance,cooperation, care -of materials, and safety; (b) Group living. including housekeeping, personal hygiene, cooperation, social adjustment, and double bunking; (c) Parttcipation in counseling sessions and involvement 1n self-help groups; (d) Progress toward the goals and programs established by the Colorado diagnostic program; (e) For any inmates who have been paroled, compliance with the conditions of parole release; (f) The offender has not harassed- the victim either verbally or in writing; : 4 (g) The inmate has made positive progress, in accordance with performance standards established by the department, in the literacy corrections program or the correctional education program established pursuant to article 30 of this title. (2) The department shall develop objective standards for measuring consistent progress in the categories listed in subsection (1) of- this section. Such standards shall be applied in all evaluations of inmates for the earned time authorized in this section. (3) For each inmate sentenced to the' custody of the department, or for each parolee, the department Shall review the performance record of the inmate or parolee and may grant, withhold, withdraw, or -restore, consistent with the provisions of this section, an earned time deduction from the sentence imposed. Such review shall.be conducted annually while such / person is incarcerated and semiannually while such person is •on parole and shall vest upon 'being granted. However, any earned time granted to a parolee shall vest upon completion of review unless h 1 ithi n any semiannual an ear ng w the department determines that such parolee engaged in t D Criminal activity during the time period for which such earned vj d - 1� �t9 on 1me was ranted. _in which case thug red time grant during s erlo may h�A�!a- In addition- to any of er sanctions, t e executive director may refer to the district attorney all cases where the offender tests positive for the presence of drugs. Mir Lt i 9131249 17-22.5-406. .Applicability -of part. -(1)(a) This part 4 applies. to all of enders:sentenced for Crimes cononi.tted-on or after July 1. 1979. (b) Notwithstanding •paragraph .(a) of this ,subsection (:../..,' f' C , (1). the amount of earned tirde which may be credited pursuant /t'.1'; 1• to this part 4.to any inmate incarcerated on or before July 1. r` i,}-�' 1990, shall not exceed the amount. of earned time actually :..`J ' earned by such inmate pursuant to earned time provisions in ',O1', r, effect prior to July 1. 1990. \, ,`1•; • (c) If the application of the provisions of this '" /\\,� II subsection (1) would result in the early discharge of any. '� offender, the department shall refer such offender to the \state 'board of parole which may, in its discretion, grant or• deny parole using the guidelines established pursuant to `section 17-22.5-404, discharge the offender or place such . offender under conditional parole supervision. If the offender is placed on parole pursuant to this paragraph (c). the state • board of parole may revoke the parole granted to such inmate for a period not to exceed the amount of earned time granted to the offender pursurrrnt- toba`adrv4- (d) Nothing, 14.01,S,,,A!&sutlon (1) ;hall be construed a>1'' alto the Sate board of parole to release 'any inmate:? (e) 1r' any inmate incarcerated prior to the., effective date of this section has not ....creed ..y earned time prior to such date, the ime of stay.- il inmate's sentenprovisions cingshall� f law in effect the apply to suchinmateintdetermining such inmate's discharge date. II(2) Notwithstanding subsection (1) of this section, no offender incarcerated on the effective date of this section IIhall be released pursuant to the provisions of subsection. (1) of this section unless the department of corrections makes a written certification that the offender has met the conditions of paragraph (a) of this subsection (2) and at least two 1additional of the following criteria: (� (a) The offender has not used controlled substances,. ' except pursuant - to the prescription of a physician, for at w i least one year prior to such certification. y,\ \• (b) The offender has `engaged in a satisfactory i^' participation in available educational programs during his incarceration. (c) The roffender Alas engaged- in a satisfactory , participation .yin any treatment programs indicated in his . diagnostic evaluation.. • , PAGE 19 -HOUSE BILL 90-1327 9212 I i I I 1 (d) The offender has had no serious infractions of the penal code of discipline for at least two years. (e) The offender has had an exemplary work record while being incarcerated under the custody of the department of corrections. , (3) This part 4 shall not apply to any offender who is presently incarcerated who does not meet the appropriate criteria stated in subsection (2) of this section: Any such offender's sentence shall be governed. by provisions in existence prior to the effective date of this section. (4) ,The state board of. parole shall make a biannual report to the general assembly on January 1 and July 1 of each year which shall include tht following information: (a) The number of persons released by the state board,of parole pursuant to this part 4 during the preceding six . months; ' (b) The names of such.persons; (c) The previous records -of such persons; • (d) The length of time such persons were incarc; ted; _ and (e) The reasons why the state board of parole determined that the release of such persons would be appropriate. . , LON-20. 16-8-114.5 (1), Colorado Revised Statutes, 1986 Repl. Vol., is amended to read: 16-8-114.5:' Commitment - termination of proceedings. (1) A defendant committed: to the departmentof institutions or otherwise confined as a result of a determination of incompetency to proceed shall not remain .confined for a period in excess of the maximum term of confinement which could be imposed for the offenses with which he is charged less m4n4wum geed EARNED time to which he would be entitled under sect4.en S-22.1-304T-CvR.L. ARTICLE 22.5 OF TITLE 17,=C.R.S. ECG TIP _ 21. 16-14-103 (1) (a), Colorado Revised Statutes, 1986 Repl.. Vol., is amended to read: 16-14-103. Duties of superintendent upon delivery of request. (1) (a)- Certifythe term of commitment under which the prisoner is being held, the .time already 'Served on the sentence, the,t:ime remaining to be. ,served, -the good EARNED time earned, the time of parole eligibility el the prisoner, and any decisions of the state board of parole relating to the PAGE 20 -HOUSE BILL 90-1327 I 921249 prisoner; and SECTION 22. 17-1-111,Colorado Revised Statutes. 1986 Repl. Vol., is amended to read: 17-1-111. Certain provisions of the administrative procedure act not to apply. The provisions of this title .relating to the management, discipline, and classification of inmates, INCLUDING OBJECTIVE PAROLE CRITERIA APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION ON PAROLE _GUIDELINES CREATED PURSUANT TO SECTION 17-22.5-404 (7), shall not be -subject, to section 24-4-103, 24-4-105, or 24-4-106, C.R.S. SECTION 23. 17-24-114 (3), Colorado Revised Statutes, 1986 Repl. Vol., is amended to read: 17-24-114. Provisions for offenders. (3) The division of adult services is empowered to grant good EARNED time allowances CONSISTENT WITH PART.4 OF ARTICLE 22.5 OF TITLE 17. C.R.S., and' furloughs in.. relation to an offender's work performance and evaluation, as recommended by the director. SECTION 24. 17-22.5-104 (1). Colorado Revised Statutes, 1986 Rept. Vol., is amended to read: 17-22.5-104. Parole - regulations. (1) Any inmate in the custody of the department who--has-se,ve4-the-m$n4miwa peF4ad-of-t4me-presaF4bed-by-his-sentence may be allowed to go on parole IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 17-22.5-403, subject to the provisions and conditions contained in this article and article 2 of this title. SECTION 25. 18-1-105, Colorado. Revised Statutes. 1986 Repl. Vol., as amended, is amended 8Y THE ADDITION OF A NEW SUBSECTION to read: 18-1-105. Felonies -classified - presumptive penalties. (9.5) The presence of any, one or more of the following sentence enhancing circumstances shall require the court,: if it sentences• the defendant to incarceration, 'to sentence the defendant to a term of at least the minimum in the presumptive range but not more than twice the maximum term authorized- in the presumptive. range for the punishment of,a felony: (a) The defendant was charged.with or was on bond for a previous felony at .the time of,the commission of the felony. for which previous felony the defendant was subsequently convicted (b) At the time of the commission of • the felony,.,. the defendant was on bond _for having pled•guilty to a lesser offense when the original offense charged was a felony;, PAGE 21 -HOUSE BILL 90-1327 I I I I I i I I i i I i I i I I 9µ1e4) (c) The defendant -was -under.. a..deferred judgment and sentence for another felony. at the time of the commission;of.. the felony; (d). At the time of the commissic of the felony, the defendant was on parole for•)sa ,... been. adjudicated a delinquent child for an offense which would constitute a.. felony if committed byan adult. SECTION 26.' 24-33.5-303 {6), Colorado Revised Statutes, 1988 Repl. Vol., as amended, is amended to read: 24-33.5-303. Definitions. (6) "Peace officer" means an investigator for a district attorney or the: attorney general if designated for training under.tnis part 3. by such district attorney or by the attorney general,. any sheriff who elects to be certified pursuant to this part 3, undersheriff, deputy sheriff other thanone appointed with authority only, to receive and serve summons and civil process, police officer, Colorado state patrol officer, PAROLE OFFICER EMPLOYED PURSUANT TO SECTION -11-2-102 (3), C.R.S., security officer employed and commissioned pursuant to article 7 of this title at a state institution of higher education, or town marshal. which "peace officer" is engaged in full-time employment by the state or a city, city and county, town, judicial district, or county within this state, ow any reserve police officer, reserve deputy sheriff. or reserve marshal, if designated for training as a peace officer under this part 3 by a chief of. police, sheriff, or marshal, or any full-time officer of the Southern Ute Indian police force or Ute Mountain Ute Indian police forcewho is certified pursuant to this park 3 or otherwise qualified under swbsection---(2)---of section 24-33.5-307 (2). SECTION 27. Repeai., 18-1-105 (9) (a) (IV), (9) (a) (IV.5), (9) (a) (VI), and (9) (a) (VII), Colorado Revised Statutes, 1986 Repl. Vol., as, amended, are repealed. SECTION 28. Appropriation. In addition to any other appropriation, there is hereby appropriated, out of any moneys in the general fund not otherwise appropriated, to the community supervision supplemental fund created pursuant to section 17-1-114; Colorado Revised Statutes, for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1990, the sum of five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000). SECTION 29. Appropriation. In addition to any other appropriation, there is hereby appropriated, out: of any moneys in the general fund not otherwise .appropriated, to the. judicial department, for the fiscalyear beginning July 1,. 1990, thesumof two hundred twenty-seven thousand two hundred fifty-six dollars ($227,256), and 4.0 FTE, or so much. thereof PAGE 22 -HOUSE BILL 90-1327 �(t ' I' • ,T ill V 'J 9C1 49 as may be necessary, for the implementation of sections 7 and 8 of this act.- i 1.-- r u •\ SECTION 30. Appropriation. In addition to any other ;`.: appropriation, there is hereby 'appropriated. out of any moneys 0: in the general fund not otherwise- appropriated, to the -,•', :' department of corrections, for the fiscal year beginning July ;s)r �l ,Li•' 1, 1990. the sum of nine hundred' 'thirty-one thousand four -,%• t hundred eighty•.dollars ($931,480), or so, much thereof as may ♦\•.,r• be necessary, for the implementation of section 10 of this • • act. �" 1\'•• SECTION 31. Appropriation. -In addition to any other I-- £ appropriation, there is hereby appropriated, out of any moneys _,`. . '' ',° II in the general fund not otherwise :appropriated, to the r `.' i ; department of public safety, for the fiscal year beginning t•O. July 1, 1990, the sum of three hundred twenty-eight thousand (`1 • il five hundred dollars ($328,500), or so much thereof as may be necessary, for the implementation of section 11 of this act. f !S • SECTION 32. 'Appropriation. In addition to any other - .•, ' appropriation, there is hereby appropriated. out of any moneys ,� in the general fund not otherwise appropriated, to .the 00� ,.‘`•' department of public safety, for the fiscal year beginning _•,. July 1. 1990, the sum of one million -six hundred forty-six `•-' thousand two hundred five" dollars ($1,646,205), or so much thereof as may be necessary, for the implementation of section .\\f II12 of this act. c.•; '-; SECTION 33. Appropriation. In addition to any. other appropriation, there is hereby appropriated, out of any moneys in the general fund not otherwise appropriated, to the judicial department, 1990, the sum of ($750,000), and•18.5' 'necessary, for the• e • i ;�:.. ., for the fiscal year beginning July 1, seven hundred fifty thousand dollars u ')' FTE,' • or so much thereof . as may be \�ti • , implementation of section 16 of this acts „Y 'Y..: SECTION 34. Appropriation. In addition to any other appropriation, there is hereby appropriated. to the departmEnt of corrections, out of any moneys iq the general fund not otherwise appropriated, the sum of one million one hundred sixty-one thousand six hundred dollars ($1,161,600), and 17.0 FTE,' or so much thereof as may be -necessary, 'for the implementation of sections 19 through 24 of this act. SECTION 35. Appropriation. (1) In addition to any other appropriation, there is hereby 'appropriated, to the department of corrections, for the fiscal -year -beginning July 1, 1990, the sum of seventy one millionfive hundred eighty-five thousand three hundred' -'ninety dollars -($71,585,390), or so much"thereof'ac may be"necessary. for the— . implementation of this act, -as -follows: PAGE 23 -HOUSE BILL 90-1327 -1 1 1 (a) Fifty-seven -million six hundred forty thousand. dollars ($57.640,"000) shall be for the close facility at Canon City; I 1 1 1 1. 1 1 1 (b) Ten million ni•• hundred fifty-six thousand dollars ($10,956,000) shall tic," the wc+nen's facility in Denver (c) Six 'hundred twelve, thousand eight hundred seventy-eight dollars ($612,878) and 25.0 FTE for the implementation and coordination of the construction of the facilities authorised in'this act; ' (d) One million three ; hundred thousand dollars ($1,300,000) shall be for the warehouse facility; (e) One hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) shall be for •• -preliminary site engineering work at the Trinidad and Sterling prison•site locations; and (f) Hine hundred' seventy-six thousand five hundred twelve dollars ($976,512) shall be for computer systems replacement. (2) Of the amount appropriated in subsection (1) of this section, forty-six million seven hundred eighty-three thousand nine hundred eight'dollars'(S46,783,908) shall be from the capital construction fund as follows: (a) Thirty million three hundred thousand dollars ($30,300,000) is appropriated from moneys transferred to the capital construction fund as of the last day of the fiscal year 1989-90 and which are available for appropriation pursuant to section 24-75-201.1 (1) (C) (V), Colorado Revised Statutes, as enacted by Senate Bill 90-163 and further amended by House Bill 90=1323, enacted at the Second Regular Session of the Fifty-seventh General Assembly. (b) Sixteen million four hundred eighty-three thousand nine hundred eight dollars ($16,483,908) is appropriated from moneys transferred to the capital construction fund as of the last day of the fiscal year 1988-89 and which are available for appropriation pursuant to section 24-75-201.1 (1) (C) (I), Colorado Revised Statutes, as amended by Senate Bill 90-163 enacted at the Second Regular Session of the Fifty-seventh General Assembly. (3) The.. remainder of the amount appropriated in subsection_(1) of this section, twenty-four million eight hundred one thousand four hundred eighty-two dollars ($24,801,482), shall be from the general fund pursuant to '- section 24-75-201.1 (1) (d) (IV), Colorado Revised Statutes, as enacted by House 8111 90-1323 at the Second Regular Session PAGE 24 -HOUSE BILL 90-1327 931249 of the Fifty-seventh General Assembly. Of --such, amount, six hundred twelve thousand _eight hundred:seventy-eight dollars ($612,878) shall be for the expenses described in paragraph (c) of subsection (1) of this section, and nine hundred seventy-six thousand f. 't hundred. twelie :dollars .($976.512). shall be for computer systems<replaceIwnt. (4) In addition to any other appropriation, there is hereby appropriated, out of any moneys in the general fund not otherwise appropriated, to the department of public safety, for allocation to the Colorado bureau of investigation, for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1990, the sum of two million nine hundred thousand dollars ($2,900,000), or so much thereof as may be necessary, for computer systems replacement. (5) The general assembly has determined that the provisions of sections 3 through 5 ofthisact can be implemented within existing appropriations, and therefore no separate appropriation of state moneys is necessary to carry out the ipurposes of sections 3.through 5 of this act. SECTION 36. Applicability. Sections 7, 8, 25, and 27 of this act shall apply to offenses committed on or after July 1, 1990. SECTION 37.: Safer clause. The general assembly hereby PAGE 25 -HOUSE BILL 90-1327 1 921249 II • finds. determines, and declares that this act is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace. health, and safety. GCB. 8Tfdsoee SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES .Bahrych CAIEF CLERK OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1 Ted L. Strickland PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE �oaibi SECRETARY OF THE SENATE t APPROVED /99? ��Si 'pn I 1 1 1 PAGE 26 -HOUSE BILL 90-1327 NOR OF THE STATE OF COLORADO 9C1249 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 16:004LEV ASSOCIATES 30374';02919 cLfi<v:;LYLh! t • P.01 .FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION COVER LETTER From Machine No. 303-330-2919 DELIVER TO gLASA*1 1S.s tt FROM DATE V CP-IN ` OWL. /0/ 1 �r TIME 4W f+t^► NO. OF PAGES. S PROJECT ^ 4^Nniee to 1y MESSAGE *L.1"1 _ CO ►►.I 11100.1 aI>1444. fesS �O 1740,1 7 04 n7 -'r.-/ \n.,i4;to Ca 741,1 1°O C:•t-1':3t'44° E Y' 152° OCT 5 '93 16:00 3033302919. PAGE.001. OCT-06-93 TUE 16:00 "LEY ASSOCIATES 503302919 P.02 They can't climb it. :=674s They can't cut it. ChainGuard' 1 1 Available in three types of material: DURABOND'" PVC Pressure bonded wire DURAGALV" Zinc coated wire DURALUNr Aluminum coated wire Worldwide Installations 0CT 5 '93 16:01 318 Inch mesh _ PVC coated ChnhiCuard' Maximum Sccunty Fencing (Shown nctunl size) ANTI— TERRORIST MESH Perimeter Security (or the World' 3033302919 PAGE.002 I I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 9L1249 I I I 1 I 1 1 I I I I OCT-05-93 Tot" "16:01"•LEY ASSOCIATES"'. ChainGuard"' maximum security fencing is extra -tough heavy gauge steel wire fabricated into tightly woven chainlink facing. Whether your client needs a barrier to keep inmates in or intruders out, ChainGuard" fencing Is engineered to meet or exceed every spec in the book. (Fed. spec.-RR•F•191/1C, ASTM-A491-S0). CHAINGUARD" IS NONCUMBABLE. Tightly woven ChainGuard" fencing features 3/8" diamond mesh -- it's impossible for even a child to gain handhold or toehold for climbing. Conventional 2" mesh can't offer that kind of security And the 3/8" mesh is just the beginning: ChainGuard" fencing is also available In 1/4',1/2". 5/8" and 1" diamond mesh. Uneatable? Cl1ar.•iGuare fencing's strong 9 or 1I gauge steel wire requires large healyduty cuttingtools, bat the tight mesh prevents cutting access. CHAL`iGUARD" FENCING CANT BE CUT The same qualities that make ChalnGuard" fencing difficult to scale also make It virtually uncutable. The tight mesh prevents access to the most sophisticated hand cutters. Frustrating and effective... (1AT GUARD" 1:179CING IS NON•PENEI'RASfE It's impossible to pass even the smallest handgun or knife through the tight mesh of a ChainGuard" fence. To deter smaller items, ChainGuard" can be ordered to meet specifications for even finer heavy duty mesh. A more tightly woven grade of ChainGuard" fencing can be specified for absolute bullet-proof integrity. Only two things can penetrate a ChainGuard" maximum security fence — sound and light. Communication and visibility are important benefits of the mesh barrier. When observation is a mustina prison or In any other institution — specify ChainGuard" fencing. imiwr NNW ■rrrMIIIM.IO"=1016r_r_ll..r_7ri== Miyii.Yrt\InAMMYUYY....:�:•••yo•.: •.• •(.�� d'�ia to IIIOnlIb41U411 ILII►tsiiimmiilaV•iiiii, it "i° :f""••-'"I•.�%.t •—•� •u w1�G •.••rr1' HYnr �•"i"I"nrrvn.nr...•u...,..•.� n•••, �� y 1 .r1/1111 LI e.: clirt� rr•� ,`v� , t/nlll'111111 vvrir I /t rdlreP/u rl,l. ow•.nNnu..ra.r N�• . 1 �• t IIIIIYII�I. 1I'lIA1/1deL1 / u ... �• ,vvH �r...•q•••,.... _ J�ill r, 1l . `• (diytLrg4lnnl.0 JYi.. ,..mmon Super secure! You can special order ChoinGuard" fencing In roll heights up to 20 feet for super secure, seamlen'nstailattons. 2 OCT 5 '93 16:02 3033302919 PAGE. ea :1249 OCT-OS-93 TUC.: 16:0,2. 9LCY ASSOCIATCS-. ChainGuard" fencing provides outstanding burst strength, too up to8I,750 pounds per foot (of height). That's 9 times stronger than a conventional chain link fence. \SE SHOULD YOU SPECTYCHAINGUARD"' 11L4XJMUM SECURJIY FENCING? 'RISONER CONTAINMENT - ajor applications are outdoor barriers for prisons, police stations and other detention centers where prisoner containment Is the criterion. ChainGuard" fencing should be used Indoors and out. It allows ventilation, observation and communication, yet prevents escape - climbing, cutting and the transfer of weapons axe virtually impossible. Some penal institutions combine ChainGuard" fencing with a lower course of conventional chain link fencing to reduce material costs. This type of combination fence defeats many of the important security features of. the ChaInGuard' fence. The conventional. 2" chain link portion is easy to cut and accessible. Only a total ChainGuard" fence will provide maximum security, SOFT-SPOKEN SECURITY - ChainGuard" fencing is available in a varietyof colored vinyl coatings and can be specified to blend with the landscape for minimum visual intrusion. Some of your clients require maximum security protection that doesn't call attention to themselves. ChainGuard" fencing is ideal for high security Installations where public curiosity is discouraged. Research facilities, financial centers, military bases and private residences can now enjoy total security without alarming neighboring properties. 301 -30291. 9 V . ChcinGuant forhighwaysafety.Highwaydepartrnentshave installed ChainGuard'fencing as a median bonier -with the added advantage — the close mesh screens oncoming headlights, STD] UONDUNG LAYER PSI STEEL WIRE mu PURE ENE a21 PRESSURE 1/D431. UP PTO 22104 THICK CAR►• GUCC 6 9 11 11 H toga COATED WIRE SORE CADGE DOM. 1 .100' VINYL 'ALL TOI.MANCR T141001633 $ me COATING OEM. FT Tuelu STREVGTN 953, 010' .034• .40 15.011 6 .. 005' .022' 30 75000 1 .163' . - poi' ter 33 _ 75,000 9 .14' 005' ,@I' .30 104000' 11 .120' .003 .020' 2S 75000 CORE COATED COATED WIRE ......WIRE... WIRE.. GAUGE .. CAUCE DAY.,.... 6. 3 -:360' : 2' 9 _ 6 . 19Y r 14 11 . .no' Yr91A7XS' 10. Ye r_ lie V '4' l' 5— K1jlxjYx Vt. xY r r .^. xx r MOCIROPIASRJC IN. 36 Lot 60, 22. 64.95106, 130.144.-165. ...192.210.. 304614 9. avid OCT 5 53 16;03 3033302919 PAGE .004 3 j' 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9::12491 t OCT-05-93 TUC 16:03 "LCV AOOOCIATC3" 30ro02919 P.05 1 I 1 1 1 C..VV.vL.<„L . "N/VNI AJ4/c2 ,. I r0 -X4711. .�1•� C • m n• ri r �t'9> c i►♦• � �%'� it Win^' A." .:�♦♦♦ a.&.I,/�oSpiciPte:%-4,:1-:.40114 1 '''`I. litirnaltik.S. tV?ti?e •i4:rakci.. na' �4 1 1i41)1Q0t',t��l'1 Urge animal containment 'CI1,%INCUARD"1'mesh. 'CN,UNGUARD" Bridge Overpass -To prevent discharge olobjects onto traffic, C mesh ts being used at 15 zoo iocatioos around the United States. 'CHAINGUAR0". This product Is preferred by State and Federal agencies aaoss the USA. Farling GarageScreen-Mesh was hoisted to the top of a 15 story building In Minneapolis, MN, Downtown parking garage -Deflection screen to keep objects from tailing to the street below. 't. OCT 5 '93 16:04 3033302319 PAGE.005 901249 OCT-06-93 TUE 16:04 Tt.EY ASSOCIATES SO3TS02919 � q 1• 147.IF .•:N,.li i4 i•/i US llodcan Border•Supersecure N' 'CHAINCUARD" security mesh -impossible to cut or climb. After many products have been hied. only'CHAO:GUARO" stops the flow of illegal aliens from crossing the border. "CXAINGUARD" products are being specified all over the world for many types of border containment Fuel depot perimeter security -Many large oil companies including Chevron Oil are using 'CHNNGUARD'-to secure valuable Tank Farms' from attack, OCT 5 '93 16:06 02830/DBP Daytime 6148 United States Embassy Paris France -Rooftop security to deflect 'RFC (Rocket Propelled Grenade) attacks, 'C IALYGUARD.. can be used to prevent this from occurring. This is a post Cull War photo showings burning well that had no perimeter form of barrier. i 1 3033302319 PAGE.008 9:31241 OCT-05-93 TUE 16:06 'LEY ASSOCIATES 307 '[02.9t9 P.OT 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 02830/DBP BuyLine6145 INSTALLATIONS WORLDWIDE D&B Products -Wire Division and our construction partner -Crowley Company Inc. have the knowhow and experience to design and build high security fence systems using "CHAINGUARDTM" Maximum Security Fencing anywhere in the world. Let us design and build your perimeter security system We specialize in helping our customers design & build cost efficient, high security enclosures. We can also provide a full line of electronic sensors and electric gate operators to reduce the labor cost in maintaining your secure area. D&B PRODUCTS -Wire Division Crowley Company Inc. "Partners in Domestic and International Perimeter Security Design and Installation" 0CT 5 '93 16:07 3033302919 PAGE.007 921249 OCT-03-93 TUE 16:07 'LEY ASSOCIATC$ 303-'502919 rL ea•. ChainGuardt" Maximum Security Fencing Standard ChalnGuare Maximum Security Fencing: Gmatt.4 Chin lihsh 'are lananoumniktta'e wiraarw-2;3100A. LI BASE METH: The base ntal d me Wet toll 'whaled the ItaOAwg breddrg Ipa(a; Nu. 6 a - 217O rsr. Na 98s -.12901%. No. I I ga - 83O la MI Wnenoa mn0e 10 Om dlamoy alp apse .i mace my. A9 ao&rg *4 be n slna10 the we ton. 12 IG9',E 27AMEITN: The wire dienatslat .M't a cleave. el as a map EC6.1retes..... 1.3 DA•Alasr COATING: The wire shall S aluminum coaled by the hct4D ram Went wvaeing. The weight d aluminum eoaM7 for 6 ga. and 9 9a shall riot be im than .4 0a. per square loot end to it 9s. na leas than 25 or. per quart tea d bang sulfate Cannel. 1 A Milano' PVC COATING Oars 1 Eatnidtd PVC are to new been mated with okher Vic or aluminum by the n01 -dip Oe Sat'0lytie p'o000,40n to 0019 culled with ANC The thkkaY of PVC costing dull be .020 Mchef phis et minus .0G5 inches. Vlwy Pun not be tut. oa .d, a WTI in any ww. IS IMO ITCIE FA(4CC The height Wail be the v.e Jl ,fmuuiun Intro the eM a the Medea Farb shah be woven N one wftirwmn Set el staled 1u1,4ai up to cM irdudtg :U tu. The cienrce ar 1dgtafullLeas amtn 1/2 inch. 1.6 MEW SET: Dr rush she tall be ektabined by masunn4 ltie stgotee dams ig.AVt woof brining the peat malts a the Ruh. The toknnte d the nth entry wig .be plus of mina 3/32 inn 1.7 StLVACE Knad&ld - -• 0WnGaard-Mudman StcvrtlyFencing noels or steeds felopet. PRF•(91/IC asd AS7 M4S140. Bunt Strength: A 3/8' tippling .1st in dianCV (II gn)sedage , Juinin,m extol a — 3/S cunning Ago in d L.ntt (14 90) plavnlaN a acd we Wm .120 in dwrk7 anal d,aryl Booth we. C — 3/r weir. .I05 in dinact (12 gal gioniaxl sell mm »im..139 in &neer bonded vinyl ran 3410. D — 3/r caning .145 in dLvmatr (9 ga)avd we w4. ohnTillulnmokt. E — 1/d' rgmkig .148 in dianr&r O ea) slier eons wve. aluminum CCU& r- 1'wping.I92 In tkumtr ous4 tae win. dWlia= oo;tol OMARGON: Rem&r Mali .120 in Preter wire (Hp) ha a burst sonleh et 9900• U. pot L d MOIL • AD A9ua Lead on I IO= P3 vLe ka.1e WIRE TYPE MESH OPENING 39� 17,69 30,450• 60.5W 81,750• 44,580' Donator or DVUCALV"' Coatlitg I/4" 3/8' 1/r- SA' . I'- 2' GAUGE DEOMALEQVIVMENT 6 .192' 9 .148' 11 ,120' Tosimptilrand expedite the specification ofourmesh, use our EAS)3'PFC"system: Absolute Menimum Stew* CJIAA'UAR4' SPEC /4(19M Medium Security Ci1AJNCUARD'SPEC I4/IA MinimumSeco: CRAINGUAN SPEC3809A Simply pick the level otsecw'iy needc4 and write in the d/AINGVARD".sped Current Installations: LOUISIANA BOYS TRAEVING INS'ITrUTE, Baton Rouge. LA/JEFFERSON DAVIS JAIL. Prentice. MO /BUCKS COUNTY PRISON, Bucks County, PA/WORCESTER COUNTY JAB, Snow Hill, MD/WESTJEFTERSON CORRECTIONAL FACUJT Y. West Jefferson, AL/POIJSH EMBASSY. Washington. D.C. /BALTIMORE WASHINGTON EXPRESSWAY, Baltimore. MD/EPA-JEROME PARK RESERVOIR. Bronx NY/CENTRALALABAMA PRISON, St. Clair Springs, ALIIWNOTS CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT CENTER, Harrisburg, nJCOWMBIA HOSPITAL, Washington. D.C./OSSINING CORRECnONALFACB.rr f, Ossining, NY/CRIMINAL JUSTICE CENTER, Nashville, TN/SOUtHEASTFRN SECURE TREATMENT UNIT, Embreeville, State Hospital. Cootsvltle, PA For more information about ChainGuard- maximum security fencing or other specialty icneingeal (410) 8225511 or write: D&B Ploducts-Wlre Dtvliioa • Dept. S • P.O. Box 1584 Easton, Maryland 21601 • Faun (410)8224)088 Company hie. • 10630 Nassau Street &E. Crowley Minneapolis, MN 55434 • E 12)784-6 Minn043 Telephone (812)7841120 OCT 5 '53 16:07 .. F • .lei � l\ \F • a\ Meth Open* 3/8 n Core Wue Di: 9 ga.. (.149 0) MtaWOpe ins 3/8 In. • Core W n Da.: 14 ga (.0E2 n) / lauded INC Finulcd See II ga (.120 u) Slap Opining: SB is t' Wire Dia: 14 a (1132 in) Eauoto Pit HNsInd Size I1 gr. (1201.) • Mask Dieing I/4 a Cat Wire Da: 14 p. (082 in) QS* Extruded PIC RIOS Sec llga(120a.) "NNW, .41.14.A. 3033302919 PAGE.008 931249, 1 1 1 1 1 APPOCANT: TM S el ar.Copmn,�s T. LEGAL oElCRVT10N: P Maee SW4 N MM. 2. 1111, POW el le ee PM. Cowie. CMS =Waft a A Pend LM Comb= LLOOA•TCM IMO el iced . Msmletit adme= MI•al Weld lei me I. 'WE Rae a Iowa W to MN N�M Wild County C•YMMa•n', Firm N teem eceM•wde C br, e,e Tom area Water. C•er•M. Careen• M e eieasM Mimi to ,M shmed to • Min a!!M�Y M C* i. wMwloMe.leI t N' VMuI. C�• t N M eepjee~ '�pe. i °ww! Nomalt ebC Ce7peMf tai;A 1•ee a! iw roastN Y lseWeir ^ Swam M MOMMm1\ AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OP COLORADO as COUNTY OF WELD I, KEITH HANSEN, of said County of Weld, being duly sworn, say that I am publisher of WINDSOR BEACON a weekly newspaper having a general circulation in said County and State, published in the town of WINDSOR, in said County and State; and that the notice, of which the annexed is a true copy, has been published in said weekly forT/ _successive weeks, that the notice was published in the regular and entire issue of every number of the paper during the period and time of publication, and in the newspaper proper and not in a supplement, and that the first publication of said notice was in said paper bearing the date of the QL 1_ day of the last publication hearing the data of the day of A.D., 19_ and that the said WINDSOR BEACON has been published continuously and uninterruptedly for the period of 5 consecutive weeks, in said County and State, prior to the date of first publication of said notice, end the same is a newspaper within' the meaning of an Act to regulate printing of legal notices anadvertisements, approved May 18, 1931. and all prior is - • ' r as in force. Subeeri of Add/ , A.D., 191,0 and. BLISHER to before me this `Ar day 1923 .4A e / 721 Gen NOTARY PUBLIC My commission expires C y Weld coati Pla sh * 9:1249'` 1 (49? SE? 29 t 19• ejeCla/ --. 116 alet,S,L,C-deaoct;:t21": 6wi,..�� : �ti rte• -� ... ... _ - --. _..._ 9i_' _/©.-h' ado__ _ e -.Ses194- --rerrab•—• eigerce-c_Allearr, ae- .. ale4 1 I. ?i _ � 93-1249- cleceigm- _I I -1 - - I GLL�� TO TEE 1 4Y.1.J VLJ ;ITY g124}ct3 - .;,�- . inct�rn_e..rn �7! �,�1nu1�. 1 ic'YL Juthbafiut,k inat&mi.,toma ak '.d'wz , ;Lw I Oa ama 9ovnipx,,amd: J ka, fin, Atahwe,a t. r li td, atl-u ail 0 amt -to ,a Gait I ,, ., 441 .fie- -i- (A �. . i I • • "Aallientily. .ia. . 'Niue _ swisideset_...o_ _ ._ .._ ,dial U cku-az..,to kola ow° 1 ;abigt o E n. u. c ¢nt, -ot- ikti4 1 2v -e, 4t j,to-t ,,ka ue- S v-adun t ;anal et &trm. ith ,zt. eilce . I _1-ao O..P l-/Ptakt- wit . eML& r. a e.._-,aaie..1lr o _ p m, _tot .c Iazaziin .,A. ,a1,aincia? k.9,onti.fiubt . a4twt , &azaL t 4 we, alba) 1 ,,thu di, cnu da/n9or Gee JL 0)4v ¢. Sakti I i& . Om „KivrL t , nu_ ,;1 - &nG. • cow._ f I __ i .,�, p-e,o.-_ c.ou eel _.,.Gie, -mac. -- ay?.49 C Exh f-� ac: 00G, .bcc c 1 elizotest • a,14u ,x,0.4 fb a 4a&n ' LO tot axial-, it 4nanut thdithant,a tb iihe See. -Mt 4twt. Jay_ vaiefriat z , Jug- puthitiodolt mute- A j.J 1 1 1 1 1 atk d ems,.1 5z� we zit•I Lb,' g wnft Co ?c&04 ... 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 The public is invited to attend an informational meeting, sponsored by Greeley/Weld County Economic Development (E.D.A.P.), on Monday, April 26, 1993 at 7:00 p.m. at the Budget Host Motel in Del Camino. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss the establishment of a correctional facility in an unincorporated area of southwestern Weld County. 'act 921249 WELCOME The Greeley/Weld Economic Development Action Partnership has been asked to sponsor tonights neighborhood meeting between The Villa and landowners, businesspeople and residents of the Del Camino and immediate surrounding areas. EDAP respectfully asks people not living, conducting business or owning land in the immediate area to wait and ask their questions after the formal meeting. At 7:00 n.m. there will be a 30 -minute presentation by the Villa explaining the proposed pre -parole release facility. At 7:30 n.m. the facilitator for the evening will invite the people who have signed the "QUESTION SIGN-UP SHEET," in the order they have signed up,to ask their questions. At 8:30 p.m. the meeting will be brought to an end and those who still have questions may stay and informally ask their questions of the representatives of The Villa. The Public Hearing on the proposed zoning change by Weld County will be held separately in the future. For more information on the Public Hearing, please call Weld County at 356-4000. Because the Weld County Commissioners will be hearing testimony and will be acting on the proposed zoning change, they will not be at tonights meeting. There will be a Weld County Representative to answer Weld County Government questions. Because of the time constraints, and because EDAP wants to allow all people who live, own property or conduct business in the area a chance to ask questions, there will not be an open forum at tonights meeting. Thank you for your cooperation. 9:1249 ti Q d,e" o 2�+r v Yis .7;Ill c, itONqq. • ,E.771:i �rJ''7 ia-g...0 >LJr �pYY-Y-�i6 S:�'�j. n Y c a N 3 it o 9 L u ay.. g zi `$ a U 3' dJ 4,i',Y,•9zya,. 4 CJfl.6$M „Yes z. 4apt O �V tia3g aY E .s� b" - • y �W3-',g Y. d 7Q Y. m c, 62 x 1 Le 0 � oes s ; � 'al' 525 Cg .. g gs !p Yjg..i^ YGYtEE5y things 0. S r Corrections official will help fight pre -parole facility By GABRIELLE JOHNSTON •amen -call Staff Writer DEL CAMINO — A former state corrections official has stepped into the ring to help Del Camino residents fight a pro- pose.; pre -parole facility in Del Camino. "We don't need any more profi- teering private types," said Roger Lauen, who said he was appointed by Gov. Roy Romer to serve on the Colorado Criminal Justice Commission. Lauer. also said he is a member of Boulder County's Jail Crowding Task Force and a criminology profes- sor at the University of Colorado. He also was the state director the • Colorado Community Corrections for eight years, Lauen said. . A state corrections representa- tive said Lauen is now associated with Citizens for Correctional Re- form. Lauen, a Boulder resident, said he would lead the charge to de- feat the proposal and expressed confidence that it could be done. "All you have to do is make enough noise," Laren said. Some area residents have cited escape rates, a decrease in prop- erty values and concern over the type of people the facility would attract as reasons to oppose the facility. The 300 -bed privately owned fa- cility cility would house inmates for 90 days while they received inten- sive educational training and counseling. While the developers of the jail, The Villa at Greeley, have not yet designated a specific site, they have narrowed the pos- sibilities to the Del Camino area. Greeley, Evans and Windsor have rejected the same proposal. Lauen said the state does not need another parole facility, as the state already has 23 residen- tial and 15 non-residential cor- rectional programs. These pro- grams, which include the Long- mont Community Treatment Cen- ter, are adequate, Lauer. said. Furthermore, there Is, no rea- son the state should sign a con- tract with The Villa when funding already is provided to the Colo- redo Department of Corrections to implement similar programs, he said. in addition. some private fa- ) ;31249 r 1 1 I i •-• 1 L e Dela • notmino i!•1 f Le :t .ii�l 1., • ti}.. Facility :would house•. , violent offenders By GABRIELLE JOHNSTON ' ' ; Thus -Cell Stall Weller DEL CAMINO — Residents claim developers of the liro•parole. facility proposed for Dal Camino'hgve ed about plans for the prison, tailing to tell real - dents violent offenders could be housed there. • • Area residents have opposed (he soobed facility . front (ho beginning, and resistance Is building fast as residents !new"iayi developers at the Villa at Greeley ate being Iesa:than honest about the ((mil - 'Dot Villa -adhnWetrat& John Coppom said he has been truthful from the beghudng , ••• ' "We are committed tat furnisidng the complete truth on any, lsaue,".Coppom said. Reeldenfs„uild;dnolopers originally told them that' only propeitlyylerlme and drug offenders would be housed in the (acllltyr ; . h . "m. Drill bvsonl ;who will be placed in the Tacit' Ity will be minlmum-rlsk.offenders," Copponn said. Its explaied.that'h& iiginallY told residents tie, f the facility would Imam "l'siniarily" property and dnhg offenders. When you stroke it down, about 7 percent of the populations at our facility will be serving time for e violent crime, and these lavplc will have been clam allied down ti ;;; ; wn risk;' Colima said. "It Is a Ill liatahonn',d to say that this facility, as a theme, would hondld• curMnt ofltnytrs." Tom \Niters, nllnrlky' for the legal services with .� the Colorado Ikryarbncnl of Corrections, said that , state would dk•te•ndne W1 O ix housed at the facility, In cooperation with the Villa, • ' "An offender who is assigned to Sala. lids facility is going to be an indi- vidual who is within a certain pe- riod of their parole date," Waters sold. ' "A person who has been pa- roled alter serving a sentence (or a violent crime has certainly, in the eyes of Uwparole board, been seen as ready for integration Into the eommunh$y," Waters said. —rho, Idea that prisoners are going to be escaping willy-nilly h , from a secured facility is not a ' totally reasonable fear. Obvi- ously, things con and do go wrong with secured facilities, Escapes do happen." • ' Waters said the state takes wv oral' precautions to ensure the safety of surrounding communl• ties, however, • •,Residents also said they feel Coppom was dishonest about the amount of time inmates would serve at the facility. Originally, ' residents understood that imhates would servo go days, but later learned that they could serve as many as fed days Coppom sold he always told •.'residents that Inmates would .• 'serve an "average" 0( 90 days. . Del Camino area residents now are circulating petitions opposing.. .: she:facility, which they plan tp present to the Weld County Man"> • nlag' Commission. In addition, ,.Concerned Citizens of Del Carel • I,no; a group of residents, is work -.I. !big by other ways to demonstrate r� oppotlllah'b the prison. ...'• ••': "C tcer'n about the types of pro;. Pk who would visit the lacflty ' •tops the list of their Concerns, the , ; :rsldenta said. ' ` - • •: ; "Some of the veined to the hi: -. �dUty are as bad as the people in • •:tie facility or worse; said Franc •. . • Canepa, a Del Camino area mai- . r But Waters said those concerns,' • •are irrational. •They are. people.. • • •$ud like you and I," Waters said::, ' Waters said the state will sup. ,:,port the Villa's efforts to build a: pee -parole facility, but will not in-' • larnne in discussions between residents and the developers. ' •'We are supportive cif:the ;Villa. We always recognize that • ; ' Um need to gain community am. :Um is theirs," Waters said, :Wing that residents who do not want the facility are free to use 'the "democratic processes at: -.their disposal.' tpa 9a1249 NOCKY-" 4•pPa":. 4,01, J44 •. 1 1 e 1 1 1 1 1 I L 3 4, E ! W-1te n ��F . �F S8 21, 18 .049 g[il `xgs z • NE Ii tv ,tat � ! s x I A7B- .... G AV i 1_ :. a ,,:$ &�6�y �g `pier R ...:14i f %a ggC F r 1 Jt1 Ti R4 LIEF:. ;IS a h ritill gel S) t=spiv : •7;�frf•E ' a ::: gpfiti2i, ,,,g 1.., I.. "Pt gill hilviiwea .t. • PA; nR �hitEigf7t!ifil.11,1 Pio* -40friei .1 n ' tillF. Q '' r• 54 Azalil: xi'it ; 40!.,: Als-i- 1! e ..� at : 4- 9feti 7 ` QI C el m .Art :44. n! AT sFF��tt ' �.. �� li`1 • gligi lie E f !E!Lj.f$ a ill l ti a cc g4a 4,7% i. R Y • K t3 9µ1249 1 I 1 t 1 1 1 I DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION P.O. Box 850 1420 2nd Street Greeley, Colorado 80632-0850 (303)353-1232 August 17, 1993 Mr. Art Uhrich Nelson Engineers 822 7th Street, Suite 520 Greeley, Colorado 80631 vy i r-wAy Planning STATE OF COLORADO IM-IRCX) 025-3(110) Del Camino Interchange Subaccount 91033 Dear Mr. Uhrich: Thank you for contacting the Region 4 office of the Colorado Department of Transpor- tation regarding future plans for reconstruction of the Interstate 25/State Highway 119 interchange at Del Camino. It is our understanding that Weld County has re- quested a metes and bounds description,of the easterly realignment of the frontage road in relation to your client's property northeast of I-25 and Weld County Road 24. We are currently in the process of designing an interchange which willaccommodate the eventual widening of I-25 to six lanes. In about one month, we expect to have a preliminary design establishing the location of the future frontage road intersection on County Road 24 as well as the on/off ramp terminal. Until the design is determined, we can not provide a precise location for the new frontage road intersection along County Road 24. For your information, reconstruction of the interchange is currently scheduled for the Fall of 1995. An alignment for the relocation -of the frontage road east of 1-25 had been provided to developers a number of years ago prior to the current planning for widening 1-25 to six lanes. It may be necessary to adjust the previously determined location and alignment to allow for the six -lane concept. Any adjustment of the previous frontage road concept will require coordination with the development on both sides of County Road 24 to ensure a single location for the ultimate frontage road intersection. Please contact Mr. Dave Forsyth at 757-9392 in our Denver design squad for further information on the status of interchange plans. very truly yours, DDD.(WRJ)cm ---,cc: Weld County Planning Dept. T. Jones D. Forsyth File via Elmquist • David D. Davis Region Preconstruction Engineer 9,31249 .1, 1 1 1 1 I i 1 1 May 10, 1993 Weld County Planning & Zoning Mr. Chuck Cunliffe Administrative Building Planning Department 1400 No. 17th Ave. Greeley, Colo., 80631 Mr. Cunliffe: After a week, the feathers have cleared from the meeting at DelCamino in reference to the "Villa" Minimum Prison Facility to be located on road 24 & I-25. After reading all the literature that was given at the meeting I am still against any zoning that would allow this facility to be located in the Del Camino area. I feel that it would ruin what rural settings we have left. I can't imagine a prison across the field from "Barbour Ponds"..a state park..I can't image a prison a couple of miles from DelCamino mobile home park...I can't imagine the poor farmer who has to live across the street from the 10' fences with bobbed wire and dogs on patrol. This is not a positive move for our area. We~st'mething good for our community. We will never get anything from this facility (but trouble) as it is a private partnership. We loose more money on our houses worth, and "The Villa" makes millions. Please do not change the zoning so this prison facility can move in. It needs to be farther East were there are NO people... Cathy Diesing 9054 1-25 Frontage Road East Longmont, Colorado 80504 P. ..149 91249 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO TRANSCRIPT OF PUBLIC HEARING IN RE: SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) PLAN, 1ST FILING, FORT JUNCTION PUD - THE VILLA AT GREELEY, INC., C/O JOHN T. COPPOM. PURSUANT TO NOTICE to all parties in interest, the above -entitled matter came i'or public hearing before the Weld County Board of County Commissioners on Wednesday, December 8, 1993, at 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado, before Shelly Miller, Deputy Clerk to the 3oard and Notary Public within and for the State of Colorado, and TRANSCRIBED by Linda Bartholomew, Rainbow's End Typing Service. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the attached transcript is a complete and accurate account of the above -mentioned public hearing. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO r Carol A. Hard ng Deputy Clerk to the Board 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO TRANSCRIPT OF PUBLIC HEARING — December 8, 1993 IN RE: SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT' PLAN AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) PLAN, 1ST FILING, FORT JUNCTION PUD - THE VILLA AT GREELEY, INC., C/O JOHN T. COPPOM. PURSUANT TO NOTICE to all parties in interest, the above -entitled matter came for public hearing before the Weld County Board of County Commissioners on Wednesday, December 8, 1993, at 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 'PROCEE'DINGS 2 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Good morning. I would like to 3 call to order the 'Board of Commissioners. May I have role 4 call please? 5 CLERK:' George Baxter 6 COMMISSIONER BAXTER: Here. 7 CLERK: Dale Hall. 8 COMMISSIONER HALL: Here 9 CLERK: Barbara Kirkmeyer. 10 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER:- Here. 11 CLERK: Bill Webster. 12 COMMISSIONER WEBSTER: Here. 13 CLERK: Connie Harbert 14 COMMISSIONER HARBERT:- Here. We are here for a 15 hearing. I will let our legal counsel make record. 16 MR. MORRISON: Docket Number 93-82 is the 17 application of the Villa at Greeley, Incorporated for a Site 18 Specific Development Plan and Planned Unit Development Plan 19 (PUD), 1st Filing, Fort Junction PUD, part of the Southwest 20 Quarter of Section 2, Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the - 21 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. -Notice was published October' 22 28, 1993 in The Windsor Beacon. 23- CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Before we have staff comments, we - 24 have a very large crowd 'here today, and we will need to 25 conduct this 'hearing in -a very orderly way. I think' that all: 3 APPEARANCES: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Constance Harbert, Chairman W.H. (Bill) Webster, Pro-Tem Dale Hall, Commissioner Barbara Kirkmeyer, Commissioner George Baxter, Commissioner WELD COUNTY ATTORNEY OF RECORD: Lee D. Morrison, Esquire Bruce Barker, Esquire APPLICANTS: John Coppom Michael Brand Harry Asmus Arthur P. Roy, Esquire Loren Bley, Architect Vern Nelson, Engineer Tom Waters, Esquire (Colorado Department of Corrections) ALSO PRESENT: Keith Schuett, Current Planner Shelly Miller, Acting Clerk to the Board 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 P R O' CEE D I N G S 2 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Good morning. I would like to 3 call to order the Board of Commissioners. May I have role 4 call please? 5 CLERK:' George Baxter 6 COMMISSIONER BAXTER: Here. 7 CLERK:' - Dale Hall. 8 COMMISSIONER HALL:Here 9 CLERK: Barbara Kirkmeyer. 10 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER:" Here. 11 CLERK: Bill Webster. 12 COMMISSIONER WEBSTER: Here. 13 CLERK: Connie Harbert 14 COMMISSIONER 'HARBERT: Here. We are here for a 15 hearing. I will let our 'legal counsel' make record. 16 MR. MORRISON: Docket Number 93-82 is the 17 application of the Villa at Greeley, Incorporated for a Site 18 Specific Development Plan and Planned Unit Development Plan 19 (PUD), 1st Filing, Fort Junction PUD, part of the Southwest 20 Quarter of Section 2, Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the - 21 6th P.M., Weld County,Colorado. Notice was published October: 22 28, 1993 in The Windsor Beacon. 23 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Before we have staff comments, we 24 have a very large crowd 'here today, and we will need to 25 conduct this hearing in:a very orderly way. t think that all 3 1 of you were at least given the, opportunity to receive this 2 brochure. If not, there are extras on the post right here in 3 the room. This is our policy on procedures for all hearings 4 conducted by the Board of County Commissioners. There are 5 guidelines listed in here for speaking and I am going to read 6 those at this time: "The Chairman will review the guidelines 7 for speaking before testimony is takenon any application. 8 All testimony is to he given at the. microphone. When you 9 first speak, please state your full name and complete address. 10 If you wish to speak again you must request permission from 11 the Chairman. All testimonyshall be relevant and should not 12 be repetitious. Clapping, booing and audible conversations 13 from the audience are not appropriate. Finally, if you have 14 any objections to any testimony, you must request permission 15 to re -address the Board". And the order of testimony will be 16 done in this matter. Thank you. 17 Testimony on Land Use Applications will be received 18 in the following order. The Planning staff willpresent the 19 recommendation of the Weld County Planning Commission. The 20 . Applicant will make a presentation in support of the 21 application. Citizens may speak in the following order: 1) 22 those in support of the application.; 2) those opposed to the. 23 application; and then applicant's .,rebuttal to testimony. 24 After the completion of testimony by the county -staff,- 25- applicant and .citizens, the Chairman may closethe public 4 1 1 1 1 1 e 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 hearing and open the proceedings to discuss the questions by 2 the Board. At the discretion of the. Chairman, additional 3 testimony may be taken, must not be repetitious and should 4 serve to clarify points raised in the earlier testimony. 5 Although a case may be continued to a subsequent meeting for 6 further action, the Board of County Commissioners normally 7 makes a decision on the application the same day as the public 8 hearing. 9 We also have a list of criteria which the 10 Commissioners will be basing their decision on. Those are 11 available to you, I think, Bruce Barker, they are on a green 12 sheet. Mine's white, but I believe yours is green. 13 MR. BARKER: I'll need to make some additional 14 copies. Who else would like to have one of these who has not 15 gotten one? I'll make the additional copies. 16 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Thank you. There will be 17 additional copies made here for those of you that would like 18 to have one. 19 There are six items of criteria that I will read 20 right now. "1) That the proposal is consistent with the Weld. 21 County Comprehensive Plan; 2) that the Planned Unit 22 Development Plan conforms to the PUD district in which it is 23 proposed to be located; 3) that the uses, buildings, and 24 structures which would be permitted shall be compatible with 25 the existing or future development of the'surrounding area as - 5 1 1 permitted by theexisting: zoning and with .the future 2 development as projected by the Comprehensive Plan or Master 3 Plans of affected municipalities; 4). that there has been 4 conformance with the performance standards outlined in Section 5 35.3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance; 5) that there will 6 be compliance with the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, Section 7 50, Overlay Districts if the proposal is located within any 8 overlay district or identified by maps officially adopted by 9 Weld County; 6) that there has, been compliance with the 10 submittal requirements of the Planned Unit Development Plan 11 and that the Planned Unit Development Plat and the supporting, 12 documents satisfy the legitimate concerns of the Board." 13 We are not here today to decide whether the State of 14, Colorado should or should not have pre -parole prisons or 15 facilities. That is not thequestionhere today. So, please 16 do not address that as a criteria because it is not something 17 that we are here to decide. Staff, would you make record for 18 us please? 19 MR. SCHUETT: Keith Schuett, Department of Planning, 20, Services. 21 The Department of Planning Services staff requests 22 that the Planning Commission Resolution be entered into the 2.3 record as written. The motion for: approval. was denied with a 24 vote of one in favor and six against. I have -talked to the 25 applicant and..an attorney representing- the majority of the. 1 1 I 6 1 opposition to the case,` and they both have agreed that that 2 would be acceptable. 3 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Thank you. 4 Are there any questions for the staff? Would the 5 applicant or the representative come forward and state your 6 purpose? 8 9 10 11 principal known as MR. COPPOM: My name is John Coppom. I am the in The Villa at Greeley, Inc. I would be commonly the Chief Operating Officer of the company. My business address is 1750 6th Avenue, Greeley, Colorado 80631. I would like to' first of all thank the County 12 Commissioners for this opportunity to present the proposal for 13 a pre -parole release center to be developed at this site. 14 Although you each are publicly elected officials, I know that 15 you also are personally dedicated to your elected office and 16 I know how much time you are going to take today to listen to 17 this presentation and the opponents and how much anxiety and 18 weighing the facts you'll do. But in the end, I hope you will 19 know the facts. I thank you`for`taking that time today, and 20 21 22 23 24 25 the patience to go through this major project. On my part, we do have a number of representatives. and ' we have furnished each of you with `an outline called Presentation Outline, and- I would encourage you to follow that, if 'you -find that. Without- the red parts it looks similar to this. That will tell -you at any point who is 7 1 speaking and. where we are in our presentation. 2 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Go ahead John. I have it 3 someplace. I saw it the other day. MR. COPPOM: In that. outline, I would like to at 5 least make note of a couple of things. It points out that I 6 am the first speaker. Under Roman Numeral Iv on the second 7 page, it points out that. Ed Kahn, an adjacent land owner to 8 our site, will speak, and he is an attorney in Denver and he 9 is unable to be . here today. _ We do have a letter from him 10 supporting the., project and saying that he feels his land 11 values will increase. He owns the south adjacent land, but he 12 will not be here today. 13 Under number 8, I .have spoken with the County 14 Attorney and Ann _ Garrison, who, is .an economist at the 15 University of Northern Colorado and who was commissioned by 16 EDAP to do a study onthis project, is tied up until three 17 o'clock this ,afternoon and I would ask theindulgence of the 18 County Commissioners to allow her to speak inour behalf when 19 she appears right around 3:00. Those arethe only two changes 20 that I see. 21 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Thank - - you. 22 MR. COPPOM: On my .Part, I'd like to, give an 23 introduction .to the proposal ,by answering three questions: 24. What is.a pre -parole release Center; where do we .wish to 25 locate the pre -parole release center; and why do we wish to 8 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 prisons to the state prison system. It also created 15 p oblems in the adult criminal 16 justice system. But indeed, it did create and establish the pre -parole release 17 center. Essentially what that legislation said was that we 18 have to stop doing the job that we're doing which was a poor 19 job, and do a job better in handlin 20 handling"offenders. The present job was handing an offender, as'he was being released, a 21 hundred dollars, a suit' of clothes, a bus ticket, and sayingP 22 "Go find your parole agent and God speed." 23 said we have ' to So the legislation do a better job and in the legislation there 24 is mandated specific ty pes of programming intended to assist 25 offenders in their transition back to the community. 'In your 9 it did a number of other things gs that were very punitive in terms of looking at handling offenders. For example, it added several 5 legislators, Representative Bill Jerke and Senator Tom Norton. ves co -sponsoring 6 But it also adds 18 total representatives it and 1 locate it at that site? 2 In 1990 there was an enabling legislation that 7 5 senators. It was a comprehensive criminal justice bill 8 that not only established' the pre -parole release center, but 3 Commissioned the establishment of a 4 Pre -Parole release center. That legislation was co -sponsored by two of our own local the he diagnostic center which is now located on Smith Road in 13 Denver. It also created the Criminal Justice Commission which 14 ' was, of course, commissioned to address the issues of state- wide r 9 1 1 packet, you will find a complete comprehensive list of the 2 program parts, and although I wont' go through that now, and 3 perhaps my cohort, Michael Brandmay cover that in more 4 detail. Let me tell you that the program does address 5 offender needs in employment, money management, housing; 6 education, domestic violence, chemical dependency, working 7 with active agencies within their own community, and I think 8 a very important thing that many people forget, and something 9 that's really important about that proposal is that the pre - 10 parole release center will also place heavy emphasis on the 11 law enforcement obligations of these offenders as they are 12 being released. Police enjoy that because they want to know 13 where the offenders are and who's out in the community. 14 The pre -parole release center was funded in the Long 15 Bill for 300 beds, average daily population. Our facility has 16 386 beds because in the RFP that was issued, a women's coded 17 program was mandated. And we know from all of our projections 18 that that part of the program will probably never be full and. 19 we really never know how many women will be in the program. 20 It's a see -saw situation where there will be low numbers, high. 21 numbers, back and forth. The women have to be 100% separated_ 22 from all the men in the facility. So there we have a unit 23 that we don't know whether. it will be full or not. We can. 24 also have, as you'll learn later on, a special management area 25 of the facility for specialtypes.of management problems that 10 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 will be explained later on. But because of that, and trying 2 to maintain a 300 average daily population, we have to have 3 more beds available to us than just the 300 that were funded. 4 But that is what is funded, 300 beds. 5 It is also true that parolees who technically 6 violate their parole, who typically are placed in the Weld 7 County Jail at the present time, would be placed in our 8 facility rather than in the Weld County Jail. I want to 9 emphasize it is not parolees who commit new offenses. They 10 must be incarcerated in a maximum secure county jail. But 11 those that are, and the vast majority of the parolees that are 12 revoked are revoked on technical violations. It could be if 13 they meet the minimum risk criteria, be placed in our facility 14 rather than in the county jail. 15 In the RFP there is a very strong statement that 16 says that inmates, and I quote, "Inmates must have a custody 17 level classification no higher than minimum restricted." In 18 the, probably the most asked question by the public is, "Who 19 will be in this facility?" And I would like to answer that 20 question for you right now. Every offender sentenced to the 21 Colorado Department of Corrections is first admitted to the 22 Diagnostic Unit where a comprehensive evaluation is completed. 23 And each offender's security level is determined. The 24 Department of Corrections has five security levels. Five is 25 maximum security or a maximum security level for an offender. 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Level. four is, closed facility, but is still a serious offender. Level three is a medium -secure facility, or a medium -secure classification. ,A ,level two facility or classification is termed a minimum restricted classification. it means essentially that there- is no concern in terms of whether or not the offender is a management problem or an escape risk. The proposed pre-release center is a level two facility which will serve only those offenders classified minimum restricted or below. The first classification would be the least serious classification and that would be the offenders or the inmates going into community corrections. The pre-release center will serve only those violent offenders who have proven themselves to be neither a management problem nor .an escape risk through a rigorous community safety conscious classification procedure. Most_ significantly, the, classification system insures.that it takes longer and makes it less likely for a violent offender to work their way through the system. in order to become.eligible for, a level two facility. There's been much conversation, pointed out that this is probably the most asked question: "Who will be in the- facility?" And there has been a lot of words that the murderers, robbers,: rapists .will go into the facility and - having worked in the criminal justice system for -twenty -some, years now, I have an,impression,that.the public believes that 12 I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 .all offenders are murderers, robbers and rapists. And 2 'according to the data that's most recently available to us, 3 which is December of 1992, this is the classification existing 4 on 9,062 offenders in the state corrections program. And I 5 point out to you that maximum enclosed are 21% of the 6 population, medium secure is 40.9%, and restricted minimum, 7 which is the classification of those coming into our program, 8 is 15.9%. The minimum is 22.2%. So at any given point, there 9 could only be about' 72% of the offenders in the state 10 correctional system would not qualify for our program and 11 could not be released or placed in our facility at that time 12 of classification. So only about 38% would even qualify, but 13 about 15% of the population specifically qualifies as minimum 14 - restricted. 15 I'd also like to point out at the bottom of this. 16 chart, because I think it's important to understand, who is 17 out on parole. Are they indeed all murderers and robbers and 18 rapists? And this is a type of offense that we 'had on 19 December 31, 1992, for parolees. Notice that -3:2 were 20 released on parole for homicide -and. sex crimes constituted 21 1.4% of the parolees: 'I don't belittle, and none' of us 22 belittle the seriousness of crime. I don't even belittle a 23 theft. It occurs to me I can'become "infuriated at an 24 offender. " So no one is belittling that. But in this 25 situation, we really want to know -who is going to go into this 13 I 1- facility, who's goingto be.serviced by it, how dangerous is 2 .the facility. And these are facts about the population that 3 is available that would go into: this- facility and the types of 4 crimes that they would- commit. ,The vast majority of the 5 people in our facility would be then convicted of drug, crimes, 6 burglary and theft. And theft constitutes theft of different 7 types, constitutes the largest single type of crime in the 8 system. 9 10 MR.. COPPOM;. I could be everything from in court 11 crimes such as an attempted type of crime or it couldbenon-- 12 support, I. guess, if a felony is non-support of your children, 13 it could be any number of other things that occur. 14 15„ offender population that I would' like to point out. The 16 17 be spelled out a little bit_.later, 6 hours a day, five days a 18 week. , That's mandated in the RFP. They'll be in there 19 working every single, day. -It's a very heavily programmed type 20 of correctional facility. The offenders are transported into: 21 the facility in a locked, secure vehicle and when they leave 22 the facility they are, again transported out of the area in a 23 secure vehicle. None are released in the Del Camino area. 24 The inmates are only --released in their own community. The - 25 people coming -into this facility will be -within -an average of, CHAIRMAN HARBER4 What:are the others for thefts? There are several other relevant facts about the offenders in our pre -parolee center will be in class, as will 14 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 90 days from being paroled. They're coming out, guys, they're 2 coming out whether you like it or I like it, they've finished 3 their sentence, they're going to. walk the 'streets and we 4 either will do something with them before they're released or 5 we will not. This facility will do something with them. 6 It is also true that, according to the legislation, 7 that A person could spend a 'maximum of 180 days in our 8 facility, but that statement is very strongly put in the 9 negative. No person shall spend more than 180 days in the 10 facility. But we know that the average will be about 90 days. 11 There are no offenders in this program who would be outside - 12 the building for any purpose. We do not have trustees put 13 tending the yard or setting up chairs or whatever. This is a 14 facility that is entirely self -enclosed and all medical 15 services, dental services, and all of the work -that takes 16 place is done inside the building. As you can see, it looks 17 very much like a school building, even though it is a minimum 18 secure but locked facility. 19 I told you in general what the facility is. I would 20 like to now answer the question where we would like -to site-- 21 it. I'd like to start from the broadest geographic 22 perspective and come down to the -narrowest or most localized' 23 area. 24 On -the overhead, we ''show the Weld County Urban - 25 Growth Boundary Map displaying the areas of potential growth - 15 1 1 for the various city areas within Weld County. Where we are 2 proposing to place the facility is outside of all of the 3 growth areas, barely outside of the Firestone, Frederick and 4 Dacono Tri-City area, .and I'll point it out now. We chose 5 this site partially because it is outside -of the potential 6 growth area of the towns. Coming in closer to the site 7 Itself, we can see the I-25 corridor running north and south 8 and what we are going to look at now is the Mixed Use 9 Development area of Del Camino. And our site would be located 10 within that MUD right here. Coming in closer with another 11 transparency, let me pickup the microphone now. 12 The Villa has an option to purchase 54 acres which 13 is located on the frontage road in the Mixed Unit Development 14 of Del Camino extending from Road 24 to a half mile north to 15 24-1/2. Our proposed site is the 22 acres that is northmost 16 on that property. It is surrounded, if I might, on the south '17 by land that is owned by Ed Kahn, who is an attorney -In Denver 18 and who has written you a letter saying he supports this 19 proposal and he believes that his land value will increase. 20 He is an adjacent land owner. The land to the east, this land 21 here, is -agriculturally- zoned and is owned by the St. Vrain 22, Sand Company, who has an official neutral position- on this 23 proposal. Further east from that is the large feedlot across 24 Road 9-3/4. To the north this property is owned by Weld 25 - County Government. It has use -for long-term sand and gravel 16 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 operations and part of it to the east is being mined at the 2 present time. If we go down Road 24-1/2 to 9-3/4 we have gone 3 more than a half a mile past the site. If we go north, there 4 are approximately four homes on the north side of the road 5 right here. And if we go straight down that road, 24-3/4 to 6 where it T's off, there is a home at the end of that and the 7 owners of that home have sent you two letters supporting the 8 project. I would point out as well that the northern part of 9 this area here, above the property, is in a flood plane. 10 If we go across the interstate, and I would point 11 out that the interstate is a significant barrier to any sort 12 of building site, we have the Barbour Ponds which are 13 diagonally north. And you have two letters from Joe Murrier 14 who is a northern director for the parks services. The first 15 letter takes issue with a number of items about our proposal. 16 The second letter says after meeting with us and going through 17 all of his concerns, he no longer has an objection to that 18 facility. If we come down directly east across the highway, 19 we have an agriculturally zoned area and then, of course, the 20 Del Camino industrial site which is zoned primarily C-3. 21 Now, the opponents would have you believe that 22 everybody in this area is opposed to this proposal. But what 23 we would like to point out to you is that every person, or 24 every property adjacent to ours, none of those persons have 25 objected to this proposed pre -parole release center being 17 1 built on that site. 2 In regard to the Del Camino business people, there 3 will be somebody from that area to speak to you shortly as 4 part of our presentation that will address those people and 5 whether or not they have concerns, or would support this. 6 So that is where we would like, to site it. I'd like 7 to answer now the question why we would like to site it at Del 8 Camino. The first thing is. that the three owners of The 9 Villa, one of the owners has had businesses in Weld County for 10 38 years. I've been a resident for 23-24. years and the third 11 owner resides in Weld County out in rural Weld County. But 12 we're committed to Weld County. We live here. Our children 13 go to the schools here. We'd like to keep our business around 14 this area. It istrue that some..other towns,would like to 15 have this site. And I've had people raise their eyebrows over 16 that. But one of those is Canon City. ,Canon City knows what. 17 a good deal it is, but we don't want to go to Canon City. If 18 we have to run a business at that great a distance, the, 19 quality of running that business, -is greatly challenged. We 20 want to stay on top of the type of businesses that we run and 21 that's why we want to stay in Weld County. Secondly, we 22 believe that the site that we've -just explained .to you is 23, compatible with the adjacent land uses. It's an ideal site. 24 It'slocated in an area, that is really innocuous to the 25 surrounding areas.,. It has. infrastructure. That's very 18 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 important. Some people said go build it out in the boondocks and we've had two towns in eastern Colorado contact us. But we'd like to, you know, we have to run the infrastructure for miles out in those areas. Big problems. But the infrastructure is right there because the sewer, for example, runs right across that property and the water is just on Road 24. The accessibility for transportation, coming in and out of Denver. It's a straight shot. As you perhaps know, the State Highway Department is going to re -do that entire intersection. It's going to become a very well-built intersection and it just has great transportation- possibilities in and out of the Denver metro area as well as in and out of the Weld County area. I can't emphasize the next point enough to everybody. There have been prisons built in Colorado out in the boondocks. Maybe I shouldn't use that term.. But way out in great distances. How do you bring in a quality staff? How do you bring in a staff that's really of the mind that they - can work with prisoners and offenders? That's a very big issue in terms of quality management of these types of facilities. And I'll let your imagination run. What type oft' 22 employment possibilities do we have in that Del Camino site? 23 We can pull from Weld County and Greeley. We can pull from 24" Larimer County. We can pull from Thornton and Northglenn,- 25 -from Longmont; as far away'as Boulder. We will have quality 19 employees at that facility and.any type of program that you 2 run, it's the employees that are going to make or break it and 3 we're excited by that potential. That's why it's a good site. 4 It's also in a Mixed Use Development area and. Michael Brand 5 will deal more in depth with the technical issues of that. 6 But it is in an ideally zoned area. It does create economic 7 development which is exciting to us, back into our own 8 hometown, 110 professional jobs, a tax -paying business, and a 9 business that will pay property tax. So, we're excited by 10 that and by that site and by the program and by the prospect 11 of placing it at that site. 12 With that, I'd like to nowturn it over to our 13 architect, Loren Bley, and let him take you through the 14 architectural site plan, please.., Thank you. 15 MR. BLEY: . Members of the Board, I'm Loren Bley, 16 Bley Associates Architects. Aur office is located in Greeley 17 at 2020 Clubhouse Drive.. 18 We've worked with ten Colorado counties in the last - 19 , seven years on jail and judicial projects and more recently 20_ we've completed work in this facility which is now .nearing 21. construction completion, that I'm sure you're aware of. Can 22 : everyone hear _me okay? Am I off or on, maybe? I'll just. 23. speak louder then, as loud as I can. 24 The purpose of the meeting today,. as I see it, is to. 25 complete the final approval of.,the PUD application as approved' 20 I 1 I 1 I i 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 by the Planning staff as they reviewed it two months ago. The 2 final plan, as submitted, is in compliance with the zoning 3 application requirements in Section 28.9, Section 28.11.1 and 4 Section 28.13 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. The 5 submittal document is essentially this piece of information. 6 It is the thickness of a Denver phone directory and yet that 7 is what 28.9 covers. It covers all the technical 8 ramifications that were reviewed and -approved by your Planning 9 staff. You know, a lot of PUD's bog down because of the 10 utility infrastructure and this was one of the pluses of this 11 particular project on the submittal. The utility 12 infrastructure, for the most part, has been there for several 13 years, 8-10 years,,and•our engineer will address that later. 14 Five utility districts approved""the' plan as submitted, as far 15 as saying, "We can service the major utilities that are. 16 required of this facility." The fire protection district, 17 Mountain View Fire Protection District, also was positive in 18 saying, "We can service emergency response as related to this 19 facility." The State Department of Transportation as the 20 Planning staff that is very aware, and over the past couple: 21 years or even four -years, they're in a re -alignment situation 22 on the frontage road at the northeast quadrant of this site. 23 They, too, have said, "We can service what needs to be done 24 here." The County Utility Advisory Board approved the utility 25 plan with no exceptions on the 23rd of September this year. • 21 1 1 There are no adverse environmental impacts, related -to the 2. proposed pre-release center. All referral responses that went 3 to state agencies have confirmed that there are no water, 4 soil, or air issues of conflict related to the application. 5 The PRC or the pre-release center is not in a designated flood 6 plane district, as John looked at that, to the north of the 7 site on the site plan, across Weld County Road 24-1/2. It is 8 not in an overlay district or a wilderness protection area. 9 What I'd like to do is give you a visual look at the 10 facility and primarily look ,at the site plan and also the 11 building plan and then if you have some technical questions 12 related to that, we can lead into that. The, if you look on 13 the overhead screen, the facility, itself is, the foot print of 14 the facility is 158 feet by 420 feet, which represents two - 15 level 123,000 gross square feet on the 22 -acre site that's a 16 part ofthe.PUD- application. There are two, access entry 17 drives designed along the 1-25 frontage corridor, here. The 18 first entry is at the southwest and that particular entry will 19 service the staff and vehicular service traffic on site. The 20 secondary entrance, which is at the northwest corner of the - 21 site, will service primarily administration staff and 22. visitation. Weld County Road 24-1/2 to the north is left in 23 its present state and is not in consideration for an access 24 point at this time. It is unimproved.. There is also a 20- 25 foot unpaved road indicated by the dashed- line at the 22 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 perimeter of the facility. And that particular lane'is a fire 2 access lane with security access gates. All the on -site 3 paving that you see on the west end of the facility, all those 4 roads are 40 -feet wide. There's a paved area for 144 parking 5 stalls; 66 are designated for staff use, 78 are designated for 6 administration, staff, visitation. The county reviewed the 7 covered -uncovered proportion 'as far as the overall 8 development. Forty-four percent of the site is covered; 9 that's hard surface covering, paving, roofing, what have you. 10 Fifty-six percent uncovered open space, and that takes into 11 account the percentages based on the initial ten -acre 12 development of the project. There is a landscaped pedestrian 13 entry court that's between the two parking lots as you see 14 illustrated on the rendering. There is an outdoor exercise 15 court which is contiguous to the east side of the building. 16 That is 120 feet by 420 feet and one of the important security 17 features on the outdoor court, you' can see the two lines 18 illustrated here. It's a double security fence. The outer 19 fence, the overall height is 14 feet; the inner fence is 8 20 feet in height. There will be either mercury vapor or high 21 pressure sodium lighting and camera surveillance on the - 22 perimeter of the site. That is a DOC requirement that The 23 Villa will also look at implementing that. 24 The landscape is approved 'by the Planning staff 25 Landscaping is proposed for -the parkway'space. That's what' 23 1 1 you see here from the parking lot to the frontage. road. That 2 essentially will be rolled earth berming.with -deciduous trees, 3 excuse me, with pine trees most likely to provide, a wind 4 break. There will be earth berming on, this would be the 5 north end and the south end of the building project and also 6 trees. This will screen the outdoor exercise secured area, in 7 conjunction with additional trees that will probably be used 8 on the perimeter fencing. Sod and underground sprinkler 9 system are proposed for the west end of the facility. I thir..k 10 that's well illustrated also on the rendering. _ And on the 11 balanceof the property, on the balance of the acreage that 12 needs to be developed, there will be a seeded fairway of 13 crested wheat with a surface and underground sprinkler system 14 proposed for, the overall perimeter. Of course, the crop 15 planting line that you see here, that will continue in crop 16 planting at this time. Thereis no development plans for the 17 outlot to the east. 18 What I'd like to do now is, walk you through the 19 building plan. One point .I'd liketo make -- this 20. rehabilitation correctional facility is unique in design due 21 to the rehabilitation program elements. The design program, 22 allows for teaching classrooms, as you can see within the 23 interior pods here. Teaching, classroomsand counseling 24 offices that share thedayroom use spaces and still maintain 25 the direct supervision management function. This direct 24 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 management function is something that is not only used by The 2 Villa, it's. also used in our county jail facilities 3 extensively with a number of counties. Another thing that's 4 unique about this type of. facility, John mentioned the hours 5 of instruction in the classroom, but there are expanded 6 facilities for recreation.' on the interior there is a full- 7 sized gym. We talked about the outdoor exercise. Also 8 included in the central core are the medical, there's a 9 medical treatment unit, dental suite. There's -also 'a 10 reference library and then there's a central commissary where 11 the inmates can exchange or get goods that they need right in 12 house there. The balance of the building, at least on the 13 main floor of course, is this would bethekitchen food prep 14 area', utility services and what have you. And there is, and 15 there's been questions about this that come up with security 16 and safety, you'll notice adjacent to the sally port there is 17 an infirmary hold for people that for medical reasons need to 18 be isolated from the balance of the pods. There are eight 19 direct supervision dorm pods, which you -can see here. Those 20 are two -level, -a -mezzanine -and a main floor. There are 36 21: inmates in one special pod and then the balance of the seven - 22 - contain 50 inmates. Of course, those areas contain the 23 classroom, day room activity space, -and the sleeping dorm- 24 - areas. --The thing''T want to'emphasize`about the design -of this 25 -facility and county jaih-facilities is that they are an - 25 analogous. They are, analogous to design and layout of county 2 adult correctional facilities, whether you're talking about 3 - Larimer County, Boulder County or Weld here. Let me point out 4 five specific ways that they are alike. Number one is the 5 life safety systems, the fire, smoke alarms,, smoke exhaust, 6 fire protection _sprinkler systems are essentially the same. 7 The building construction type has, to meet code requirement, 8 has to meet a. Minimum. Uniform, -Building Code. Type 2 non 9 combustible. You have controlled -movement of inmates within 10 these facilities. Del Camino is a lock -down facility,, if you 11 will. Of course our county jails are lock -down.- This is not 12 a revolving door check in, check out. Sally port situation, 13 of course handles the disposition and intake of people coming 14 and going from this facility. They will .not be released at 15 the visitor's -entry to mill_about in the-tri-city area, That 16 seems to be another assumption that we've been dealing with- 17 all along. - 18 Let me point out something else, too. We've 19. screened and touredother county. facilities, right here, in our 20 _ own backyard. Both this type of facility, DOC level 2minimum 21 security inmates, Larimer and Weld County currently have 22 contracts and house minimum security inmates in our 23 facilities. That's..a fact.-Boul,der,County has had.a,similar 24 program. They have,a.350-bed capacity -.limit. They currently, :don't have DOC inmates, but in talking -to the lieutenant. 26 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 I. 1 1 1 operating officer there within the last month, if space were 2 available, they would continue to contract that program with 3 the state DOC. 4 Very quickly I'm going to show you just the upper 5 level of the building. The rendering shows you a pretty good 6 idea of the two -level aspect of the facility, but you. can see 7 here that the administration perches on the second level of 8 the facility. It has a view of the front range and in the 9 core of the second level is where the inmate visitation would 10 take place. This is primarily a weekend program. During the - 11 week, this space on the second level would primarily be used 12 for staff training and classroom use. 13 The rendering gives you a good visualization of the 14 facility as far as how it would look on the I-25 corridor, the 15 color rendering. This particular drawing gives you the 16 elevations all the way around the facility. I may be 17 redundant, but I'll say it again, John has said it, the 18 building appears, visually,'like a suburban high school. The 19 footage, the massing is the -same, the rendering speaks for 20 itself. About the only thing we didn't get is maybe the front - 21 range air pollution and maybe some rooftop units on the - 22 rendering. But what you'see is' what you get. The building - 23 overall height is'24'feet. The exterior materials are brick 24 and block masonry. 'It has what's -known as a membrane' roofing 25 system. You can see by the elevationsthere's quite a bit of" 27 i natural light proposed on all elevations, not only. in the 2 administration area. Here's the outdoor exercise area that 3 has an extensive wall of a plexiglass material, non -breakable 4 material and administration, as well as the daylight skylight 5 hoods into the dayroom pods. 6 . . I want to make just a couple comments and then I 7 want to open it up to any questions that you may have as a 8 Board. I'm kind of at the preliminary end of things here, but 9 you will see in this presentationthat clearly the task before 10 . you is to separate facts fromassumptions and assertions. 11 We've dealt with this from neighborhoodhearings all the way. 12 through Planning Commission to this Board meetinghere today. 13 .Facts about the facility. . Four facts I'd like to bring home. 14 I do have these that I've filed with the County Attorney, if 15 you'd like to look at these, I don't know if he distributed 16 them. Fact one: the project isapproved by Planning staff. 17 The referral agencies, that's the state referral agencies, 18 have thoroughly perused this entire application. The utility 19 .districts have also made comment. There's nothing, that would. 20 indicate that there's any problem with servicing the facility 21 as designed. 22. The second point: the building design is technically 23, correct.. We haven't had one word from the. opposition. saying, 24 "Technically this thing won't work." We haven't heard that - 25 from any of the commission boards. I _think that the one 28 I I 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 question we had.came from the Chairperson.from the Planning 2 Commission, a question about the non -climbable security fence. 3 I meant to bring that sample along today. Non -issue as far as 4 even the security fencing and some of the other aspects 5 regarding that design. 6 Third point: :all life safety issues have been 7 addressed, reviewed and approved. I believe you have a 8 supplemental letter that came back from 'Mountain View Fire 9 Protection District dated the 2nd of December. There was a 10 question earlier about information whether the district could 11 respond. It had to do with response time and the life safety 12 systems in the building. And staff responded in a pro -active, 13 positive manner, "No problem, we can take care of that." 14 I'd like to make one point, you know this whole 15 issue of security, one point that I think cuts to the quick 16 regarding this issue. The pre-release center, as designed, is 17 secure. It's as secure as this Weld County adult detention. 18 center across the plaza where 'we have level two DOC inmates. 19 Across the hall, eight feet across the hall, we are now, we 20 have the capability as it was designed, to hold ten -juveniles- 21 that I'm sure you're aware of. Thirty feet vertically, or 22 less than that, on the third -floor bridge, we have a 90 -bed 23 work -release facility in this particular portion-of"the Weld 24 County complex. If Weld "County -felt that the security 25 restraint classification now imposed on this building by the 29 1 1 Uniform Building._Code, which this building renovation was 2 done, and it's also proposed for Del Camino, if Weld County 3 felt that this posed a personal safety threat to this place of 4 assembly here today where I'm assuming we're looking at 300 5 people, if it were indeed a threat to this place of assembly, 6 would we even be meeting here today? I'm open to your 7 questions. 8: CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Any there any questions for Mr. 9 Bley? 10 COMMISSIONER WEBSTER: I have one that I like, to ask 11 Loren. You mentioned in your opening, comments that, or maybe 12 John did, that the prison system that we have had in the past 13 is not working and this maybe a new concept to :have these 14 people incarcerated towards the end of their term through a 15 planning program. If that were not to be worked out, let's 16 say that program•or plan is not successful, we find out that, 17 , again this program is' not successful, and we decide to .convert 18 this facility intoa four or five level security type of 19 - program, is it the way that that is designed today, could or, 20 would that be done? 21. MR. BLEY: That's a good question, Commissioner. 22 Number one, let me say this. You can't make a paper,,change to 23 upgrade the higher risk offender to _go into the facility as 24 designed. Structurally,, the building will not allow that. In 25 other words, you, get into more ofwhat -.1 call a_bunker-type_ 30 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 design, fully reinforced perimeter walls and the pod design 2 would have to be completely renovatedand the construction 3 cost would be prohibitive to do that. In terms of other 4 development on the project site, that would be subject to a 5 hearing and I think The Villa has discussed that at the 6 Planning Commission hearing. But with regard to the facility 7 as designed, a paper change would not be allowed. - 8 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: I have a question regarding, you 9 mentioned a non -climbable fence, and that was my question, is 10 what kind of fencing goes around the perimeter on each side of 11 this building and also if that same kind of fencing is used on 12 the recreation area on the second floor of the facility? 13 MR. BLEY: First of all; the fencing,that's,'let me, 14 go back to the site plan if Imay: This particular drawing 15 illustrates this is the interior fence in the exercise- 16 courtyard. This is the 8 -foot high fence which is a cyclone 17 fence, similar gauge and then it's topped off with a barbing, 18 if you will, either a barbed wire or an angular barb. The 19 perimeter fence, the gauge -is so tight in the mesh that you 20 can't get the diameter of your fingers or knuckles into it. 21 That's what makes it non climbable. It's also a heavier gauge 22 than the interior fence. It also comes in any color under the, 23 rainbow, so there is an aesthetic consideration. Now I wish: 24 I would have brought -that -sample.' 25 CHAIRMAN`-HARBERT: -You putsomething in our packet 31 1 1 and I. did read some of -that,;, but I:just-wondered what -kind of 2 a space is between them and what- goes in -the -.space between 3 them. Is there 4 MR. BLEY: The space between the two fences, you're 5 probably looking at about 15 feet of actual. separation and 6 its, nothing' is in that space -other than the fact that you 7 have a screening to keep rodents, or anything from burrowing 8 under. And,, of course as I mentioned earlier, you have 9 complete camera surveillance on the perimeter of the facility. 10 - CHAIRMAN HARBERT:, Andwhatdo you do to keep them 11 from burrowing under?. Not only the rodents, but - 12 MR. BLEY: But folks that think -they want to get in 13 or out? -Let me say that there's- different programs in this 14 fencing situation. You can -actually put an alarm system in a 15, fencing system. , One of the drawbacks from that is that with 16 the Colorado high winds that we get, you may get a -lot of 17 false alarms from just the wind oscillating the fence line. 18 Or you can take it astep--further, but there's different 19 gradations of things that you can do with the fencing. The, 20 main thing, is- that you can.'t get at it with wire cutters and 21 anyone that's in the vicinity of the perimeter is going to be 22 seen from two or three central control points. 23 CHAIRMAN HARBERT:-,:-know, I've been to, the, I think 24 its the juvenile corrections .facility -in southwest Denver 25 where they have double fencing kike this and then there's 32 I I I I I I I I 1 rolled barbed wire in between it. 2 MR. BLEY: Excuse me. Yeah, -and I didn't bring the, 3 ,yeah, at the 4 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: And I think that it showed it had •I 5 a top and some in the middle. 6 MR. BLEY:. On the documents, on the plans, on the 7 14 -foot high fence, there is a radius' at the top. In other 8 words it comes up straight for about, I'm going to say 9 feet 1 9 and then it rolls back on'a radius curve,' but a total height 10 of 14 and you have the capability of putting in, hanging a 11 spiral wire from 'the inside if you so desire. And that was, 12 I believe on the schematic drawings, the five sheets submitted 13 that Commissioner Baxter is looking at. 14 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Are there any other questions for 15 Mr. Bley? 16 MS. KIRKMEYER: The Division of Parks and Outdoor' 17 Recreation, could you explain to us how you have addressed the 18 concerns of the parks and recreation area there? I know one I19 of their concerns was the all-night lighting. 20' MR. BLEY: Was this from the state? 1 21 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Yes. I22 MR.: BLEY: Sure, go ahead John. 23 MR. COPPOM: My name-is'Jahn Coppom, if I may answer 24 that please. The impression of the Parks and Recreation were 25 that the lights there would be the bright white type of lights I 33 I l that would also be projected out into the surrounding area:. 2 And when we described to them the type of lighting that we 3 were going to have and how it is really down into the area, 4 minimum lighting in the front parking, area, that's just to 5 watch our cars, that's really what, it's about. And minimum in 6 the back, but enough to at night to be able to see the outer 7 perimeter but pointed straight down. They were no longer 8 concerned that that was a problem to the Barbour Ponds. It 9 would be less intrusive than what presently exists at Del 10 Camino, that was their conclusion. 11 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: Another question I had, did 12 you say you were going to plant a crested wheat grass, is that 13 what you said. 14 MR. BLEY: we were looking at what.we call a fairway 15 crested wheat or something that would establish itself and 16 fill within hopefully a two-year period, a two to three year 17 period. Let me make one other comment, too. We've worked 18 with Public ServiceCompany_before on lighting issues similar_ 19 to this. A lot of times yougo through a test program in 20 which youshield lighting todo exactly what you want it to 21 do. And that would be a part of, not of, working with DOC and. 22 The Villa, as well as the surrounding neighbors as far as how 2.3 the shielding would accomplish where we want lighting and 24 where weneed it. 25 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER.:,.The reason I asked about. 34 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 the crested. wheat grass is -that the City of Longmont had a 2 concern about, that it doesn't -provide consistent ground 3 cover? Did you address that concern anywhere in your 4 proposal? 5 MR. BLEY: Well, we, our local nursery man, and the 6 consultant that we talked to here locally said he felt that 7 was a good go for the application that we have. We think that 8 Kentucky Blue, other than on the :frontal elevation, you're 9 just getting into a real maintenance nightmare. Buffalo grass 10 was another suggestion. 11 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: How often do you patrol the 12 perimeter and at what frequency? 13 MR. BLEY: I'm going to have Michael Brand address 14 that. Are there any questions about Mountain View's follow-up 15 with the emergency response? There may be someone here from- 16 Mountain View that will address that also, but we can do that 17 at a later point in the presentation. Thank you. 18 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Any other questions regarding the 19 architecture? John, I know that your -group is probably not 20 completed with their presentation, is that correct? 21 MR. COPPOM: That's correct. We were really - 22 prepared to time it so that at your break we would be- 23 finished, but 24 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: We are going break for lunch at 25 this time and we will return at I:30, is that 'acceptable? 35 1 MR. COPPOM: That's fine. 2 (Recess taken) 3 CHAIRMAN HARSERT: I,would like to reiterate for 4 anycne that may have come in late that if you would like to 5 speak following the presentation, you need to sign a card and 6 you also need to sign the clipboard if you haven't done it 7 already, just noting your attendance. If you'd like to speak, 8 you need to sign.a card. They're up here onthe clerk's desk. 9 Please put on it your name, your address and if you're 10 speaking pro or con. If you're with an organized group or 11 represented by legal staff or legal counsel would you please 12 give the card to your legal counsel and legal counsel will 13 hand them to me at the time when he wants public testimony 14 from his people. So, otherwise, .if you're not with an 15 organized group represented by legal counsel, will you leave 16 your card on the desk with the clerk and everyone that signed 17 a card who wishes to speak, is to do that, okay., Yes sir? 18 UNKNOWN SPEAKER,.FROM AUDIENCE: On•the registration, 19 do we have to put for or,_against-on the registration? , 20 CHAIRMAN HARBERT:--No. Just your name and address 21 on the clipboard.Thank you.-,, There's been some - 22 misinformation that people were, told that if they would call 23 in today during the hearing that their comments would be put 24 on the record. I, don't know where that•information came from. 25 It is not true. we are:not accepting phone calls today. If,_ 36 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 i 1' 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 you want to be a part of the record you either need to speak 2 or you need to -have turned in a letter or we would"accept the 3 letter today if you have'five copies, actually six copies of 4 it. Legal staff needs one,- the five commissioners each needs 5 one. So that is not correct and I don't know where the 6 information came 'from. 7 Where were we? Again, I'd also like to reiterate 8 that we will be, the criteria were read for this hearing. We 9 will not be taking testimony -on whether -or not people -should 10 be put on probation or whether the state should have probation. 11 facilities. Those responsibilities do not belong to county 12 commissioners. 13 Mr. Coppom, I -believe we're ready -to 'start- again. 14 Let the record show all five commissioners -'are present. 15 MR. COPPOM: My name is- John Coppom. Our next 16 speaker will be Vern Nelson, the engineer. We do, again, beg 17 -your indulgence, but because of'the delay this morning, we - 18 have a couple of speakers who have other commitments -and have 19 to go elsewhere. So, Vern Nelson will be followedby Dr. 20 Spence Anneberg -and then Michael Brand will explain one other. 21 shift with a young lady that needs to he back in Fort Collins - 22 in the middle of the:afternoon. --So, Vern Nelson, please. 23 MR. NELSON: My" -name is Lavern C. Nelson. I'm with 24 Nelson Engineers. I'm the -engineering agent for -the applicant 25 -- here today. My office is at 822 -7th -Street here -in Greeley. 37 1 1 I-'ve had about 35 years of:engineering experience :in Weld 2 County and I am a Colorado Registered Professional Engineer. 3 I've, had a great deal,. of: experience dealing in zoning and 4 development issues in Weld County. 5 With respect to, this PUD today,.I wish to take a few 6 minutes to provide some history regarding development in the 7 Del Camino area and the site of this subject PUD. In the past 8. years, development pressures have: been very high for 9 development :in that . -area, but no convenient vehicle was 10. available to provide for those zone. changes that had been 11 requested from the area. agricultural zoning prior to the early_ 12 1980's. The Comprehensive Plan policy statement:very clearly; 13 encourages: the preservation...of agricultural uses in Weld_ 14 County, without the.interference_of incompatible residential,. 15 commercial,, and industrial -land uses. Additionally, areas in 16 Weld County such as the Del Camino, are relatively small but 17 active commercial development,and residential areas could not 18. expand due to -the current use commitment and lack of community - 19 water and sewage systems. An amendment- to. the Comprehensive 20 Plan was developed to provide a: vehicle. for rezoning from,:. 21 agricultural uses,. In that- amendment, the 1-25 Mixed Use 22 Development which you heard about,. earlier,_ was defined and. 2.3 incorporated in. the .Comprehensise' Plan by Ordinance 147. 24 :adopted -in 1987. That Ordinance:; provided for development that;: 25 requires urban services:in the, I-25 Mixed Use Development, MUD': 38 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 we call it, area which includes this site. 2 After that, the St.: Vrain Sanitation District was I 1 I I i 3 created and a complete public sewage system is now is place to 4 serve development in that area. Public water supplies have S also been enhanced recently by the development of new -supply 6 lines into the area. Other utilities have also been expanded 7 in a similar manner to serve the area. Several PUD'districts 8 have been developed within the 1-25 Mixed Use Development, and 9 I might add more are pending. The Fort Junction PUD was one 10 of those districts created to provide for future development 11 in this area. The Fort Junction PUD meets the objectives and 12 goals of the 1-25 Mixed Use Development area, as well as the_ 13- intent of the defined Planned Unit Development District as 14 described in Section 35.1 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance.' 15 The planned development, as submitted in September 2; 1993, 16 will conform to -the-performance -standards of Section 35.3 of' 17 that Zoning Ordinance. Prior to -discussing the Plat. note, I 18 would like to submit for the record a chronology of events 19 with respect to this particular PUD district site. 20 A church was planned forthe site some time prior to 21 the PUD rezoning that occurred under USR 7698650 -in -late 1986 22 and prior to the I-25 Mixed- Use Development concept. The 23 project, as envisioned by the USR, was not pursued or recorded: 24 for various reasons, one of which I understand is that the 25 minister who was the driving force; -died. The church then" 39 1 offered the property for sale.`: Denver developer Hawkiss 2 purchasedthe. land on contract and proceeded to change the 3 .zone to PUD. This he did,'in fact,. the applicant remained the 4 New Creation., Church, and the intent of that PUD' was .not to 5 develop a church, but for other commercial and industrial 6 uses. Hawkiss never completed the purchase, so ownership 7 remained with the church and still -does. However, the 8 requested rezoning was accomplished under Case Z-448 on March 9 8,-1989. The district plat was filed in February -of 1990. 10. The submittal -date for the final'PUD plan was extended on June 11 15, 1993 by the -Weld County Planning Commission. There were 12 no objectors at the meeting to review the requested extension. 13 The stated purpose of the PUD,. according to Weld County 14 Comprehensive Plan is to provide -more flexibility for 15 development -than standard.zoning:and to allow mixed land uses 16 in unincorporated areas of': Weld County. Such development 17 , potential does increase the land values and when:development 18 is not allowed or zoning:is downgraded,..property values_ -in the 19 area are generally reduced:. Until .zoning _issues are 20 solidified and conditions of development make development: 21 feasible ' are met, very: ,little: increase in- activity,•; 22 development activity, occurs. That has been.. the case with 23 this specific site,.:which has been'on.the market for:upwards:. 24 - to six years.. 25. The condition of the Fort Junction,PUD rezoning are 40 1 1 1 0 1 I I 1 described by the :filed -plat notes A through M on the PUD ' 2 district plat. 'I'm sure each of you have had an opportunity 3 to look at that PUD district plat. If you've not seen the I 4 full-sized one, at least you've seen a reduced size. I want 1 5 to discuss each one of those plan notes to relieve you of any 6 concern that we -now, in filing the final PUD plat, can meet I7 the conditions of that initial filing. 8 Note A required the creation ofa law enforcement I9 authority. That has not been done, but that issue is' covered I 10 in a letter from Sheriff Jordan to John Coppom. -'The Sheriff 11 says in that letter, "In my' opinion, that area can be 1 12 adequately covered by the Weld County Sheriff's Office and a- 13 separate law development authority is not required to police ' 14 the Del Camino area." I15 Note B of that plat 'discussed' the development of 16 public roads. -Well, as a matter of fact, what we are I17 proposing in this final plat, there are no public roads 18 involved in the development of this so that matter is moot. ' 19 All of the roads are private. 20 Note C, the culmination of inactivity of this area- l21 and the desire of the Colorado Department of Transportation to ' 22 proceed with design and development of a -new interchange and 23 frontage roads at the Del Camino resulted' in the State of 24 Colorado proceeding with its-own'pl'ans-and incorporating the 25 construction of the east' frontage road in its- budget and I 41 1 rebuilding schedule. -Now, Note C required that the developer 2 of that site provide that frontage road, that ` requirement 3 being made at the time the plat was filed. Upon discussion 4 with the Colorado Department of Transportation while planning 5 this project, it was learned that. Colorado Department of 6 Transportation planned to build.a frontage road and the land 7 owner was relieved of the requirement of plat Note C by letter 8 of May 31, 1993, from the Colorado Department of 9 Transportation. The only requirement'remaining with respect. 10 to Note C is that the land owner shall provide an 80 -foot 11 right-of-way for the planned realignment of the frontage road 12 and turning lanes at the entrance when traffic on the frontage 13 road warrants. , Specific alignment for the, right-of-way has 14 not been established by the Colorado Department of 15 Transportation; however, the owners have agreed to provide 16 that .right-of-way at the time that information becomes 17 available. 18 Note D. This referred to the alignment of the 19 frontage road south of Weld County Road 24. All that asked 20 for was that the frontage road on the north side of Weld 21 County Road 24 and the frontage road, on the south side of Weld 22 County Road 24 would meet - at the same point, at the same 23 .intersection. 24 Note E had, to do with ,access to, .Weld County Road 25 24-1/2. As you. saw on the.map.earlier, 24-1/2 is -.immediately 42 1 i 1 1 I 1 adjacent to the site on the north side and that is not an ' 2 issue since the applicant does not intend to access that 3 particular road. I 4 Note F required that the applicant provide access to I5 the Kahn property, the Kahn property being that adjacent on 6 the south of this site and there is no problem in providing I7 that access from the frontage road. 8 Traffic master plan, Note G and H had to do with I9 traffic studies and plans. Those are incorporated in the I10 traffic study provided specifically for this PUD. There are 11 two proposed accesses to the I-25 frontage road which you saw, I12 and each is estimated by our traffic engineer, Gene Coppola, 13 to have an average daily traffic count of 60 units. The ' 14 current traffic study has been submitted with the application. I15 You have the information there. No specific or extensive 16 construction is required to comply with the recommendation of ' 17 that report. In the course of our preparing our application, 18 there also became available a report that was done for the 1 19 Colorado Department of `Transportation for the 119/I-25 ' 20 interchange. That was accomplished by the firm of Felsberg- IHolt of Denver. That report, the results of that report and ' 22 the one by Gene Coppola have been incorporated and do concur 23 with respect to the traffic patterns in the immediate area. I24 Note I had to do with drainage plans. Those have 25 been developed. As part of `the plan, there will be two. I 43 1 1 detention ponds on the site to capture all of the run-off from 2 the developed area, and that run-off will be released into the 3 existing drainage facilities at the calculated historical rate 4 of run-off from the same area. Undisturbed areas of the 22- 5 acre site will maintain their historical drainage patterns. 6 Note J had to do with a weed control plan. We have 7 created a weed control plan. It's part of the application and 8 a letter from the Longmont Soil Conservation District provides 9 concurrence with that plan. 10 Note K had to do with the Longmont Fire Protection 11 District requirements and they are being satisfied in the - 12, final plan as you heard earlier. 13 Note L, the site plan review. In accord with 14 Section 33..4.5 is in process as required. 15 Note M had to do with geology and adjacent concerns 16 of, for example, the rural ditch and the rural ditch is not 17 being affected by this initial.PUD since all development will 18 be north of and downstream from the ditch. Jack Hill has 19 agreed by telephone that the PUD will not affect the operation 20 of their ditch. The Colorado Geological Survey has reviewed. 21 the geologic information submitted and has notified my office - 22 . that Jeff Hines believes the. entire PUD district may have 23 significant gravel deposits but the.,22-acre site by itself 24. does not warrant any further discussion and the removal of 25, gravel therefrom becomes a moot point from theview. point of 44 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 the Colorado Geological Survey. 2 The PUD plan application identifies all the 3 utilities that will provide service to the site. 4 Representatives of each of those utilities has seen the plan, 5 has signed the plan, and have commented that their service is 6 available. Briefly, water is available from the Central Weld 7 County Water District and there is -an existing 12 -inch line in 8 Weld County Road 24 and that will be extended northerly along 9 the frontage road to serve this area. It will be a joint cost 10 item. Sanitary sewer facilities you heard earlier. The - 11 sanitation district has an 18 -inch sanitary sewer line on the 12 property, on an easement on the property that will be utilized 13 to provide the service to the new facility. Rocky Mountain 14 Natural Gas, there is a 3 -inch distribution line existing on 15 the east side of the I-25 frontage road adjacent to the 16 development. Telephone, US West will provide the telephone 17 service. Electric power will be provided by United Power who 18 states in their letter that they are ready, willing and able 19 to provide the electric service to the site. Fire protection 20 will be by, as I said, Mountain View Fire Protection District;' 21 and the required fire'flows and -hydrant locations have been 22 determined and are agreed to by the applicant and the' 23 district. We believe that that takes care' of the utilities.' 24 It's my opinion'that this application conforms with 25 the performance standards of -Section -35.3 of the Weld County' 45 1 1 Zoning Ordinance and that,..the Planned Unit Development plat 2 and the supporting documents satisfy the legitimate concerns 3 of the Planning Commission and the Weld County Commissioners 4 as described in the. Weld County Comprehensive Plan and the 5 Zoning Ordinance. This concludes my comments and I ,will 6, answer questions if there are any. . 7 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Are there any questions for Mr. 8 Nelson? 9 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: I have a question that 10 perhaps maybe Keith can answer. - In our packet, I notice a 11 letter from. the Colorado Geological Survey. In the second 12 paragraph in there, something about. an understanding that the 13 mineral resource issue has been addressed. Would you clarify 14 that for me please? 15 MR.. SCHUETT: Yes, ma'am. The mineral resource 16 issue is an issue that was reviewed at the change, of zone 17 stage. That was the appropriate application process in which 18 it was reviewed, rather than at the final plat stage as we are 19 here today. So it's really not an issue with this final plat 20 or final plan stage. 21 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Are there any. other questions? 22 Thank you, Vern. 23 MR. COPPOM: Our next presenter is Dr. Anneberg. 24 DR. ANNEBERG:. My name is Dr. Spence Anneberg. My 25 office address in. Greeley is 909 28th Avenue. ..I am a 46 I 1 I 1 1' physician who has lived here in Weld County for 13 years now. 2 I practice psychiatry and I have a nice family of four 3 children ranging in age from 9 to 18. My wife is a teacher. 4 My professional experiences include a number of visits to 5 jails to examine inmates. During my medical internship I had 6 occasions to perform minor surgery on inmates inside the South 7 Dakota State Prison. In my current practice I also have 8 occasion to interview ex -offenders. When I examine these 9 people alone in my'office, they really are the same people as 10 anyone else. I have reviewed the proposed curriculum to be- ll used in the intensive rehabilitation pre-release facility. 12 The planned activities and efforts in this curriculum, I 13 believe are wonderful. As a medical doctor in the human 14 services field, I can testify that this proposed facility will 15 be a rehabilitation center. At the same time, the center will 16 be carrying out the security aspects associated with prison 17 terms for offenders. This facility's main mission will be the 18 rehabilitation of offenders just before they re-enter our - 19 society. Up to' now, many of us- citizens have felt that 20 prisons do not rehabilitate offenders. Instead, I feel and 21 many people feel, they have tended to educate offenders in 22 even more crime. This proposed facility will actuallyprovide. 23 rehabilitation. The proposed "pre-release facility, in my 24 opinion, will provide a wonderful opportunity for these people 25 to actually have a second chance at leading normal, productive 47 1 lives in our communities after they are released. The 2 curriculum looks exciting. The curriculum attempts to address 3 many of the issues that got these folks in trouble in the 4 first place. The rehabilitation program gives these people a 5 second chance and opportunity. This,in turn, gives us 6 citizens a chance. These people are going to return to our 7 communities anyway, so let's try to maximize their opportunity 8 for success. We cannot just write off offenders and. expect 9 that their negative impact will somehow disappear from our 10 society. Throughout history, in my opinion, we Americans have 11 tried to ignore and deny the reality of the existence of crime 12 and of the offenders. I believe it's time for us to wake up. 13 Crime is hitting us rightsquarelyin the face all over 14 America. We do need to try to, help these offenders -after we 15 have punished them and thereby be helping our own communities. 16 I believe that this facility will attempt -to rehabilitate 17-- these people. I believe it ,is imperative that we, as a 18 nation, and we as a county, that we care about' these offender 19 people just as we•care about ourselves. Caring about all - 20 people is supposedly, what we are -all about. - 21 Now, let's talk about the problem of crimein our 22 society. Crime is a huge problem. None of us like crime. 23 Many of us are very, very frightened -about crime. In the past 24 12 months,, we have been inundated with -crime stories. Crime 25 is all around us. 48 1 i 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 CHAIRMAN HARBERTd Could' you stick to the program 2 that you're going to present?'' we're 'not here to decide what 3 ' crime is, okay? 4 DR. ANNEBERG: I might have some difficulty altering 5 the way I've written my speech. 6 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Okay, well if you could just 7 refer to the programthat you're -going to present. 8 DR. ANNEBERG: I'm trying to give the Board a 9' concept here that crime is located everywhere in our society, 10 it is not just located inside of a'prison and the concept that 11 we are afraid of a prison needs to be blended in or melted in 12 with the concept that we all -are afraid of crime everywhere. 13 The opposition has, and will focus, on a pre-release 14 facility as the object of their fear, as the source of their 15 fear. We should be afraid of the prison, we should be afraid 16 of the criminals, we should be afraid of the people who visit 17 the prison, etc. I believe, folks, that this is misdirected 18 fear. I believe that these are misplaced fears. Part of the 19 debate you folks are going to have to deal with today is the 20 following: Is there a sound, solid foundation of fact behind 21 the fears that you're going to hear about today? I `believe 22 that there is no basis for the fears surrounding this pre- 23 release facility. However, there is a plenty big basis for 24 our everyday fear 'of crime in -Weld County.`'For instance, in 25 1990 in Weld County, 'there were 8,625 crimes committed but 49 1 1 only 2,000 of those were ever solved.. Seventy-five percent 2 then of the criminals who committed crimes in Weld County in 3 1990 still remain right amongst us. People who do crime, 4 then, are everywhere. 5 I want to talk briefly to you folks about, leadership 6 and decision making. Leaders, are people who objectively 7 review input that they receive from various sources. Leaders 8 are not people who allow themselves to be manipulated by fear 9 portrayals. You folks can indeed anticipate that fear 10 inductions will be done today during this meeting. Certainly 11 everybody does have a right to speak and they will be allowed 12 to do so. But I would urge you leaders simply not to make 13 important decisions by reacting to people's fears and opinions 14 that have no basis. 15 In termsof decision making, in public -health- 16 decision making for instance, good quality decisions are based 17 on reviewing the facts, the objective facts and not swayed on 18, emotion. A good example of fear induction that's been used in 19 the past in the public health arena. swirled around the issue 20 . of fluoridation. For instance, some of the people back in the 21 50's and 60's claimed that fluoridation was a Communist plot 22 and persuaded the community leaders toban that. So I'm 23 saying that good leaders are.. leaders,. they're not followers. 24 Good leaders should not be led by other people.'s fearsif the 25 other people's fears. are notbasedon. facts. When successful 50 1 opposition induces its fears into the leadership, then it 2 results in leaders following the crowd. I would challenge you 3 folks today then, to make your decisions and to make your good 4 decisions based on objective review of the facts. Please 5 weigh the facts that you're hearing today more than the 6 emotions. 7 Based'on my review of the several factual studies 8 that have been done pertaining to the issue of studies of 9 safety around these pre -parole facilities, it appears that the 10 facts overwhelmingly indicate that this particular pre -parole 11' facility is a safe addition to a community. I believe that 12 the overstated fears that you will hear about later today are 13 not based on fact. Remember, this'is a rehabilitation pre - 14 parole facility. These offenders are going to be returned to 15 their communities anyway, whether this facility is built or 16 not. I would then, rather that these offenders enter our 17 communities' with a reasonable chance to succeed without this 18 type of rehabilitation being offered in this proposed 19 facility, these offenders will continue to live out the self - 20 fulfilling prophecy of failure and then we all lose. We say 21 we are worried sick about crime.' I think it's time then that 22 we do something about that. I think we should develop 23 programs that deal with offenders more effectively. Let's try 24 to stop the'revolving`door. Let Weld County stand up and be 25 counted. Let Weld County do itself proud that we are doing 51 1 something about crime. Let Weld. County show courage to get 2 beyond fears. 3 I want to make a brief comment about the, "Not in My 4 Back Yard" syndrome. .The "Not ._in.My Backyard" mentality 5 really should not be, considered in land use. considerations 6 when the facts show nothing but safety and compatibility in 7 that backyard. Besides, we really don't have the luxury of 8 the "Not in My Backyard" thinking today. We are a community, 9 we are like a big family and the essence of a healthy big 10 family is that we haveto deal with our problems, we cannot 11 deny them away and we cannot ship them away. Instead, we have 12 to stare at our problems and deal.. with them. They just won't 13 go away. Saying that a different way, our societal problems, 14 that of crime, are already in our own backyards. 15 So, in summary, I challenge you, the leaders.. of this 16 Weld County family of peoples. I challenge you to break new 17 grounds. I challenge you to. think carefully, and to weigh 18 carefully your decision today. I challenge you to lead your 19 people. beyond their fears...I challenge you to not capitulate 20 the fear inductions when the fear is not _based on fact. We, 21 must move forward in Colorado. We, must find new ways to meet 22 the challenges of crime. I believe we must not sit back and 23 let crime tear apart our families, our nation and our society 24 and our homes. As a medical doctor,. as a psychiatrist, and as 25 a father of four children, I believe this pre -parole facility, 52 I I I. I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 l 1. is a small, but significant step in the right direction. 2 MS. HARBERT: Are there any questions for Dr. 3 Anneberg? Thank you, doctor. 4 MR..BRAND: Commissioners, my name's Michael Brand. 5 I'm the corrections director for The Villa. I've worked 20 6 years in corrections. I've worked in prisons from maximum 7 security to minimum security and positions ranging from 8 correctional officer or guard to positions of being a security 9 director in a prison that handled maximum to minimum security 10 inmates. 11 A couple of comments first, or a couple of people 12 here that you may want to rely upon to answer some questions. 13 One of them is Tom Waters. Mr. Tom Waters is an attorney from 14 the Department of Corrections who can address any Department 15 of Corrections issues. Also here are Chuck Boise and Chief 16 Ward from the Mountain View Fire District who can respond to 17 some issues if those arise. 18 I want to address three topics today. The first is 19 compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and the Weld County 20 Zoning Ordinance. The second is information on our 21 rehabilitative purpose and program,of this facility. And the 22 third is extensive information and examples regarding 23 compatibility, community safety, and land value information. 24 Before I do that, I need to introduce one of our 25 witnesses. Miss Libby. Glass works for WW Reynolds, who 53 1 developed the Prospect Park East Commercial and Industrial 2 Development Area. That development P park is immediately 3 adjacent to the Larimer County Detention Center. The Larimer 4 County, Jail Detention Center is 110,000 square feet. It has 5 361 beds and 110 staff, virtually identical to the size of the 6 facility that we're looking at in our application. So I'd 7 like to yield the floor briefly to Ms. Glass and then continue 8 my presentation. 9 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: - What is the difference 10 between a detention center and a pre-release or pre -parole 11 facility? 12 MR. BRAND: The Larimer County Detention Center is 13 their county jail, if you will. They deal with people from 14 the least serious crimes, traffic offenses and warrants to the 15 most serious kind of offense from the most violent and 16 serious. They deal with what they call unclassified 17 offenders. They don't know, who they're getting into their 18 facility. A difference is also that they have a much shorter 19 - length of stay than what we're, talking about with the pre - 20 release center. The last difference I'd note is that that is 21 considered a maximum security facility as are other county 22 jails because they deal with every level of inmate security. 23 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: What's their approximate length of stay? 25 MR. BRAND: I think,.the average in the .State of 54 1 t 1 i I 1 1 1 1 Colorado is 15 days. That includes unsentenced and sentenced 2 people in county jails. Any other questions before I yield 3 the floor briefly? Thank you. 4 MISS GLASS: I'm Libby Glass. Can you hear me? I'm 5 Libby Glass, 1304 Morgan Street in Fort Collins and I am 6 project manager for the WW Reynolds Companies. We have been 7 in the real estate development business for approximately 30 8 years in the Boulder area, in the Fort Collins area, primarily 4 in the office industrial park development. I'm not a public 10 speaker. I don't have a` prepared text and if you want to 11 interrupt at any time and ask me any questions, please feel 12 free to do so. Can you see this map over here, or would you 13 rather I 14 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Is that a copy of what was in our 15 packet? 16 MISS GLASS: It is. 17 18 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Okay. 19 MISS GLASS: Maybe the best way to do is I can - 20 point. Yes, that's fine. I'll just speak real loudly. 21 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Take the mike with.you, 22 MR. MORRISON: You need to take the mike with you, 23 please. 24 CHAIRMAN-HARBERT: The cord is not real long, well 25 maybe it is. 55 1 1 MISS GLASS: What I want to do and I<won't stand 2 here the whole time, is justto show you: -where the detention 3 facility is. We purchased this 90 -Acre park about 8 or 9 4 years ago. This is the Larimer County Detention Facility 5 here. And the park is approximately 70% developed. We have 6 about 500,000 square feet of developed buildings and some of 7 the companies who have chosen to locate in the Prospect East 8 Business Park,are Hewlett Packard, Viapont Pharmaceuticals who 9 make Viadent toothpaste, Advanced Energy has three buildings 10 in the park, they do power enhancers, Motorola, Digital 11 Equipment and several other names that you probably might not 12 be as familiar with. In addition, we also have a daycare 13 center that we really believe is an amenity to our. park. In 14 this building up here, can you, see that one right up there, 15 Seven Oaks Academy has approximately 150 full time equivalent 16 students and have been in the park for about three years and 17 they're at capacity right now. They have a nursery, they have 18 a preschool, after school program,, and they also have a 19 certified kindergarten program. The Poudre River Recreational 20 Trail runs along Sharp Point Drive there and; goes out in the 21 midst of these city lakes- back to the nature center. I'm also 22 in the process right now of talking to another private school. 23 Anybody who's in real estate knows that a deal's not a deal 24 until it's signed, but, ;they wouldbe going in 7,200 square 25 feet within the park in this location right here. 56 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 I also would like' to say, I forgot to say when I 2 came up to the podium, that I really don't support or oppose 3 the project. I have no opinion whatsoever on the project. I 4 don't know that much about the project. I'm just basically 5 here to share what my experience has been, both in Prospect 6 East Business Park and also in our business park in Boulder 7 County which is also, it's basically the same set-up. The 8 difference is we have 60 acres in Boulder right across the 9 street from the Boulder County Detention Facility and we have 10 90 acres here. I don't know as much about our business park 11 there because I don't have anything to do with it, but I do 12 know that Hauser Chemical has about an about 80,000 square 13 foot facility there and Synergen and a couple of other people 14 that we've done build -to -suits for. And our experience has 15 been that it really is kind of a non -issue. I know when the 16 daycare center first came to look at it, the wife was 17 concerned about it. They moved here from Nebraska. But after 18 talking with the tenants within the park, almost all of whom 19 have when its time to renew their leases, almost all of them 20 ' had renewed. I got off the track. She was concerned about 21 it, but it basically became a 'non -issue and they have been - 22 there for three years. They are' in a ten-year lease. It's' 23 very successful. It's a daycare' facility for, the pricing is 24 probably like a Children's World or Kindercare or something 25 like that. They have computers and gymnastics equipment and 57 1 1 all of that. It's a full-scale daycare facility. As a matter 2 of fact,a lot of the employees at the Detention Facility have .3 their children there and also within the business park. what 4 else can I. tell you? Excuse me. 5 Well,. it's a beautiful park. I don't think that 6 really has anything to do with anything, but since I brought 7 the pictures, I'll show you. These are pictures of both the 8 Lake Center.Park which is the one in Boulder,and also the 9 Prospect East Business Park. And I think the real reason I 10 brought this and I remember now, is so that you.can.see the 11 flowers. We work with the Larimer.County people sothat the 12 business park will have a consistent lookand when they 13 expanded their facility, we_met with the commissioners and 14 talked_ with them about how important it was to have a 15 consistent look and they were obviously in support of that. 16 And they kind of just integrated into the business park. It 17 has worked out very well for us in both locations. it. really 18 is a non -issue from,a security standpoint. Not only do we 19 have the detention facility, but the city shooting range is 20 also within the business park, the indoor shooting range. So,:. 21 consequently, we have, excuse me, we have county deputy,. 22 sheriff's vehicles andcity police vehicles within the park. 23 . 24 -hours a day. In the 9_ years that we've been there we've: 24 had one theft and that was.within a.company, _a disgruntled 25 employee. Security, really, we basically. -have, free security.. 58 1. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 and we use that as a selling point and it really has worked 2 very well for us, because a lot of business parks do have to 3 hire security and we don't. What else can I tell you? 4 Oh, directly across the street is the Seven Lakes 5 Business Park. That's about 100,000 square feet and it's an 6 upper end business park where there are some medical 7 facilities, there are some other light industrial facilities 8 and also the Fort Collins Orthopedic Associates just built a 9 50,000 square foot facility just east of our park, just across 10 the street. So as far as land use compatibility; in our 11 situation it has worked very well. A mile up the street you 12 have, you know, some of the nicest residential areas in town. 13 Actually in two different directions. Fort Collins High 14 School has purchased property located about a mile and a half 15 south of our park. An apartment complex. You know, it's just 16 right in the middle of a lot of different use and it's worked 17 very well. And I would just reiterate that the Poudre 18 Recreational Trail is right there, the city owned recreational 19 trail and a lot of our park employees go out and use that 20 during the day. Do you have' any questions? 21 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Are there any questions for Miss 22 Glass? 23 MISS GLASS: Nope? Thank you very much. Good luck. 24 Could I just say one more thing? I just wanted to say that 25 I'm just so impressed that so`many people have shown up. I 59 1 8 9 something that's already been provided for the record. Those 10 photographs aren't otherwise in the record? 11 MISS GLASS: Okay, and when can I get them back? 12 MR. MORRISON: .Well, if we can get a duplicate of 13 those, we can substitute it, but.I need to keep them for now. 14 MS. HARBERT: I think if you get a duplicate of the 15 pictures. They don't need to be mounted do they? 16 MR. MORRISON: No. 17 MR. BRAND: Commissioners, I want to apologize for 18 having to, have a couple of people out of order. It did 19 disrupt the flow of ourpresentation, but we're dealing with 20 time frames that they have and closings and all of that. To 21 get back to the issues I want to address, again, one is 22 information on the rehabilitative purpose and program of our 23 facility. I believe that's important. Two is compliance with - 24 all expectations and requirements in the Comprehensive Plan as 25 well as the Weld county Zoning Ordinance andalso further, 1 mean, thisis in the middle of the week in the middle of the 2. day. It really is incredible.. forthis many people to care 3 this much on both sides. I'm really. impressed. I know you're 4 impressed I'm impressed. 5 MR. MORRISON:-The photographs have been marked as 6 an exhibit. 7 MISS GLASS: Can't we keep them? MR. MORRISON: No, because that's a duplicate of 60 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 information and examples regarding compatibility, community 2 safety and land 'values in areas immediately adjacent to 3 correctional facilities. 4 On the pre -parole release center's rehabilitative 5 intent, it started with the enabling legislation. This is in 6 your packet. I gave you a packet today that looked like this 7 when it came. What the enabling legislation said is that the 8 facility or program provides in -residence programs and 9 services to instruct such inmates in obtaining and holding 10 regular employment, in the process of enrolling in and - 11 maintaining academic courses and vocational training, in 12 utilizing the resources of the community after release, in 13 meeting their personal and family need and responsibility and 14 providing appropriate in -residence treatment and participating 15 in whatever in -residence specialized programs are available. 16 When the Department of Corrections let the RFP, the 17 request for proposals in January of 1992, their intent and 18 what their statement was that the pre-release program design 19 will focus on programs identifying and assessing individual 20 needs and establishing community linkages for continuation of 21 treatment and related -services upon release into society. 22 Program structure will include' six classroom hours per day; 23 five days per week with curriculum on a"twelve-week-cycle. 24 what we didn't emphasize enough really in our 25 application was really happens inside the pre -parole release 61 I 1 facility. -And ..that's .an ;important issue for you to 2 understand. You do have in yourpacket, in your initial 3 packet somewhere, it's right behinda blue page that is 4 labeled "Program Components". That:lists all of the program 5 components that we proposed to the state. And I don't want to 6 spend a lot of time going through them, but it's important for 7 you to understand the depth of our program. The program staff 8 as outlined in our proposal includes. two curriculum directors 9 and 24 teachers or instructors, if -you will. So we're 10 dedicating a lot of, money ,and staff just to provide the 11 programmatic elements beyond the basic. security .elements. 12 Components include, I'll just quickly mention some of them: 13 Chemical dependency, looking at the sociological aspects of 14 alcohol and drug use; looking at adult children of chemically 15 dependent parents; the 12 -step program; looking at a component 16 on employment, assessing their previous experience; helping: 17. them with the resumes; administering tests such as a general 18 . aptitude test battery; trying to establish as best we can 19 employment for the peoplewhen, they're released from the 20 facility so. that they can move -right into a job. That's one 21 of our liaison functions from thefacility to the -community. 22 Job -seeking skills issues and.the education component we deal 23 with basic literacy training adult basic education; we do 24, assessment instruments like the test of Adult Basic Education, 25 the GATBY Test, the Wide -Range Achievement Test,etc. to 62 I 1 1 t 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 assess their academic acumen and at what level they are and to ' 2 what kind of agency they should be referred to in the 3 community. we have a relapse prevention component dealing 4 with compulsive behaviors, etc., cognitive restructuring 5 dealing with creative thinking, problem -solving, management of 6 emotions, social- skills, critical reasoning, etc. The 7 rehabilitation program has interpersonal skills, anger 8 management, communication skills, family relations I think is 9 very important as well as domestic violence. We're dealing 10 with people who've been incarcerated for just over 3 years on 11 the average. They're re-entering a family situation in which 12' they may or may not have been in control. Certainly they're 13 re-entering a family situation where they're going to have to 14 re-establish some role. Are they going to be the leader, now? 15 Are they going to be able to deal with their child Who was an 16 infant when they went to prison and who is now four years old. 17 Practical issues of release such as that. Deal with a 18 dysfunctional family. A lot of our people come from 19 dysfunctional families. Health and wellness. An important 20 one I think is what we call special needs offender component. 21 We will be dealing with people who have limitations. They 22 have academic limitations such that they can't read 'at all. 23 And we have to provide a program for them; = We have people who 24 don't speak English. We need' to provide a program for them. 25 We have people who have significant, but manageable physical 63 or mental health limitations and we need to deal effectively 2. with them. Those people, the special needs offenders, need 3 more one-on-one workand they need more, specific referrals 4 back to the community. 5 While I state, you know clearly, and this program is 6, a rehabilitation center, I'll say that we'll do what we can in 7 90 days, an average g of 90 days. We recognize we're not going 8 to rehabilitate everyone in, 90 days. 9 The most important part of the pre-release program is that. we insure a continuum of 10. services from what we assess and from what we know about the 11 , people back into the community. That referral systemnot only 12is. to specific community resources like chemical dependency 13 and mental health and employment, etc., but ,it's also a 14 liaison service back to law enforcement and back.to the parole 15 officer to which they're reporting.. So we're preparing the 16 offender for release. We're also trying to. prepare the 17 community for theoffender's_ release. 18 I'd like now to move to -compliance issues. Could 19 you put this second one up there, Loren? You have -in your 20 packet, the one that you received today here. The first thing-. 21 in there is a memo to the Commission from myself that deals 22 specifically with all the ,applicable requirements and - 23 conditions established by the Comp_, Plan .and by Zoning 24 Ordinance. Your Zoning Ordinance states -that -this Commission 25 shall approve the request -for the.,PUD Plan unless it finds the 64 1 1 I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I 1 1 applicant has not met- one or more of the applicable 2 requirements or conditions of 28.9, 28.12.7 and 28.13. The 3 Zoning Ordinance goes on to state that we, as applicants, have 4 the burden of proof to show that the above standards and 5 conditions are met. That's what this memo is going to do. We 6 are going to show that we meet all of the conditions in our 7 application materials, our application packet we, in the 8 section titled, "PUD Procedural Guide, Application 9 Requirements," Mr. Nelson went over many of them, and outlined 10 in our application is our compliance with all Ordinance and 11 Department of Planning Services expectations. We have 12 supporting attachments that follow. We went 1 through 29 13 specifically, as requested, and addressed each of those 14 issues. All of the required architectural and engineer's maps 15 and drawings are complete and are submitted as part of the - 16 application. There's no utility or infrastructure or 17 environmental concerns related to this application. 18 In addition to the information included in the PUD 19 Development Plan, the following further demonstrates our 20 compliance with requirements outlined under Section 28.13. 21 28.13 states that the proposal is consistent with the Weld- 22 County Comprehensive Plan. In regard to the 1-25 Mixed Use 23 Development area, the Comprehensive Plan states that the 24 District allows residential, commercial, industrial and- 25 institutional uses to occur after they have been reviewed and 65 1 1 approved according to the. PUD application process. The PUD 2 application process is an approach which promotes freedom, 3 flexibility and creativity. In the absence of a definition of 4 the term 'institutional'., in your Ordinance, I'll use the 5 common accepted, definition. According to Random House, 6 'institution' is defined as "a place of confinement as a 7 prison, mental hospital, etc." Our position is that the 8 proposed land use, ,the- pre -parole release center, is an 9 institution and for that reason is allowed in the 1-25 MUD as 10 described in the Comprehensive Plan. 11 We need to demonstrate that our plan conforms to the 12 local PUD District that's already been established. That's 13 your Ordinance 28.13.1.2. The existing PUD District is 14 current and its approved. for commercial and industrial land 15 use as follows: "I-1 ten -acres, 215,000 square feet. C-1. 16 through C-4, 22 acres, 470,000 square feet." The existing 17 Fort Junction PUD District then, allows for all levels of 18 commercial development as well aslightindustrial. We, the 19 applicants, have submitted a PUD plan for 123,000 square feet 20 of development on 22+ acres within the district. .We assert 21 that our proposed land usage, in this application meets a 22 commercial definition as described in the Weld County Zoning• 23 Ordinance. Although correctional or pre-release are not 24 specifically named.. in the Ordinance, we'rerelying as have 25 manyprevious applicants .on your, Ordinance -5.10, -"All Uses 66 1 1 a I I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 Allowed By Right, Temporary Uses, and Uses by Special Review 2 listed in this Ordinance are representative and are not all - 3 inclusive". Because pre-release, pre -parole release center is 4 not listed, does not mean that it is not a permitted use or 5 that it's a non -permitted use as will be asserted by the 6 opposition. Further, we are an Overlay District. Do you have 7 that overhead, Loren? 8 I want to talk about the Overlay District a little 9 bit. The Commission established 1-25 Mixed Use Development 10 area as an Overlay District. The Overlay District, to just go - 11 over it briefly, says basically that there's unincorporated 12 areas within the county that have urban -type services. 13 Basically, you have utilities and roads, etc. And the basic 14 language is that that creates more'flexibility in use and more 15 flexibility in your decision -making process It's further 16 recognized in your Ordinance that the PUD procedure permits a 17 greater range of flexibility than the standard zoning system 18 which does not always balance the capacity of a site with 19 compatibility to the neighborhood. Our position is and we're 20 going to have a`lot of evidence showing that we are compatible 21 with the neighborhood. That is not an issue. We are 22 compatible. But what the Overlay District does is that it 23 allows the maximum amount'of flexibility. That's one reason 24 that we chose this site. We -feel that the Mixed Use 25 Development area, the PUD, the existing PUD district, and the 67 I 1 Overlay District, when we looked. at it and this site was in 2 all of those areas, we felt that that was the most appropriate 3 site for us to attempt to build this development and it's the 4 site that gives you the most flexibility again in your 5 decision -making process. 6 I think that this Overlay. District, this, Ordinance 7 was made purposely. I think you did it on purpose because 8 there are certain areas in unincorporated Weld County that 9 have these services. And these are exactly the areas that you 10 ought to be looking at true Mixed Use land development. 11 I'd like to talk now about, you have an Ordinance 12 that states "Intent of the C-3. District". The, intent of the 13 C-3 District is, "To establish and preserve areas for 14 activities which provide, goods or services for the benefit of 15 the general public pr which requirelarge amounts of space or 16 high traffic volumes." High traffic is not an issue_ _That a 17 pre -parole release facility requires large amounts of space is 18 clear and that the building is relatively large.. Adequate 19 space for landscape buffering.is desirable as shown in our PUD 20 plan application. And this gives .you some idea of the 21 buffering that we're doing. That the land usage. provides 22 services for thebenefit of the general public is clear. It 23 was established, by statute. All legislative statute concludes 24 with the statement, "The General Assembly hereby finds, 25 determines and declares that this._ act is necessary for the I I I I I I I 68 1 immediate preservation of the public peace, health and 2 safety." There is a use, did we show, Loren, the hospital? 3 There is a use allowed by right in a C-2 District and then 4 follows into 'a C-3 District for hospitals, nursing homes and I5 mental or physical rehabilitation centers. Hospital is 6 defined in Ordinance as "Any institution receiving inpatients 7 and rendering medical, surgical, psychiatric or obstetrical 8 care for humans to include general hospitals and specialized 1 9 institutions." We are not asserting that the pre -parole 10 release center is a hospital in -the classic sense; however, 11 you need to understand and its clear, that the proposed land. 12 use, the proposed facility is a specialized institution, that 13 we will render in our normal course of business medical and ' 14 psychiatric services. As required by the state, nursing staff 15 will be on duty on a daily basis. A physician clinic will be 16 conducted three times per week, and psychiatric services will 17 also be provided as necessary. 18 We are asserting, our position is, that the pre - 19 parole release center is a rehabilitation center as allowed as 20 a Use By Right in your Commercial Ordinances. In absence of 1 21 a specific definition of rehabilitation, use Webster's- 22 Dictionary its, "To restore or bring to a state of health or 23 useful and purposeful• activity as to training or therapy.": ' 24 That nails our program. That's why i spent some time going 25 over our program. That is exactly the purpose of the pre_ 69 I parole release_ facility. It's a correctional facility that 2 provides rehabilitation services, extensive rehabilitation 3 services. Beyond the medical.and psychiatric, again,'program 4 elements encompass sixhoursa day. Twenty-six staff are 5 involved. The major purpose and intent of the pre-release 6 center is to provide therehabilitative program elements 7 directed toward the smooth and safe transition of individuals 8 to supervised release within their own communities. 9 I'd_ like to move now to the last, and I think 10 probably the most important topic I'd like to cover.A very 11 important topic, it's in your packet again. It'sin. between 12 the blue pages. I want to provide evidence, extensive 13 evidence really, regarding the effects of correctional 14 facilities on compatibility with adjacent land uses., future 15 development of land uses on adjacent. properties, land values 16 of adjacent properties, and community safety. These are 17 really the germane issues that you'll be confronted with.. 18 These are the issues, I think, that need to be addressed. 19 I'd first like to briefly goover what's called an 20 Information Brief - Issues in Siting Correctional Facilities. 21• This was not put together for our agency. Itwas put together• 22 by the United States Department of Justice, National Institute 23 of Corrections. To go through; it briefly, to study and look. 24 at how correctional facilities across the country affected 25 their respective communities onthe issues that I. just talked 70 1 I I 1 I 1 i 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 about: property values, public safety, economy, quality of 2 life and law enforcement capabilities. The facilities that 3 were selected for the study, there were seven facilities in 4 four different states. They ranged from minimum security to 5' maximum security. They ranged from county to state to federal 6 facilities. For each facility this study defined a target 7 area and a control area. The target area they defined as a 8 circle of a number of miles that in the center is the 9 correctional facility. The control area is a demographically 10 similar area that does not have a correctional facility in it.; 11 And then they looked at all these- issues. So it's a quasi - 12 scientific, sociological study. When they looked at first, 13 how did the correctional facilities impact public safety, with 14 one exception, the Department of Justice's Analysis revealed 15 either, one, there's no significant difference in crime rates 16 for the target and control areas, or the crime rate in the 17 target or the prison area is significantly lower than in the 18 control area. The one exception where the crime -rate was 19 higher around a prison, they note was for factors other than 20 the presence of that correctional facility. They said that' 21 escapes did not pose a significant-threat`to the personal 22 safety of the residents near the correctional facilities. 23 They talked with law enforcement officers extensively. Not 24 one of the fifteen law enforcement 'officers interviewed 25 reporting having heard, not only having dealt with, but having 71 1 heard about any crimes committed in the community by the 2 inmates' visitors. These are not our words. This is a study 3 that was done independently. How _about the local economy? 4 Just briefly they have numbers there,_ but their conclusion is 5 all of the correctional facilities had a positive effect on 6 the local economies. Quality of life. The majority of 7 respondents in their opinion believe the safety of their 8 neighborhood was not adversely affected. Seventy-eight to .9 ninety-four percent believe that their neighborhood's quality 10 of life had not declined as a result of,a development of a: 11 correctional institution. What were the perceived impacts of 12 correctional facilities on local, law enforcement? It's a very 13 important issue, especially in this area -that we're talking 14 about. The fifteen law enforcement officials interviewed 15 showed only positive comments. None of the law enforcement 16 officials interviewed could identify any specific negative 17 consequences of having a, correctional facility in their 18 jurisdiction. That's one study dealing with seven different 19 communities in four different states, again ranging from 20 minimum to maximum security. You have in your packet in the. 21 middle of your packet a number of other examples that I would 22 like to go over quickly please. This is an important issue. 23 You'll hear from the opposition very strong 24 opinions, that's what they are - opinions,, that no business 25 will develop around a„prison;,,-our children will ,not be safe 72 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 I I 1 I. 1 1 1 I t I I I 1 I I 1 when they're waiting for the bus; my property won't be worth 2 anything; who'd want to live by a prison; you know, 3 development will not occur; visitors will be committing 4 crimes, etc. These opinions are not based in fact. I ask you 5 Commissioners to demand credibility in statements, in my 6 statements and anyone else's statements. I would like you 7 please to not let the strong legitimate expression of opinions 8 go by without asking, at least to yourselves -- it's hard to 9 confront someone who's really emotional -- but ask at least to 10 yourselves, "How do you know that? What basis in fact do you 11 have to say that your children are in danger or that business 12 won't develop, etc.?" 13 Now I want to continue now with further evidence, 14 more local evidence, again on the effects of correctional 15 facilities, compatibility, future development, land value and 16 community safety. The police chief, Chief Michaels in 17 Windsor, contacted four pre -parole release facilities in the 18 State of Texas, privately operated pre -parole release 19 facilities very similar to the one that we're talking about in 20 our application. He spoke with each of the city's police - 21 chiefs. The pre -parole facilities have been in operation for 22 three to five years, had had over 15,000 inmates go through - 23 the facilities. Chief Michaels was informed by each of the 24 other chiefs that there had been no escapes, there is no 25 increase in crime in the community, and all the'chiefs said 73 1 they had not had any problems associated with the pre-release 2 facilities. 3 Another example is in a research study that was done 4 by Professor Garrison, Ann Garrison, who I hope can be here 5 later this afternoon. She can address this a little bit more 6 in depth. She went into this skeptically. She'll tell you 7 this. She was asked to do this by the, City of Greeley. She 8 went into it thinking that she would find negative 9 information. What she found was that her research, this is 10 not opinion, her research found property values rose faster in 11 cities with prisons than in cities without prisons. She 12 looked at fourteen communities and it showed that . property 13 values and crime rates were not adversely affected by the 14 presence of those correctional, institutions. She looked at 15 the specific regions in fivedifferentstates showing that 16 correctional facilities had no negative impact on population 17 growth or growth of the employment base or future business 18 development. Down in Florence they just built a huge 19 correctional complex -- 2,700 to 2,900 beds. It's called a 20 federal correctional institution, FCI. We talked with the 21 developer down there, real estate developer said there's been 22 no community —safety issues. He said compatibility is 23 demonstratedby a significant amount of commercial development 24 that is going up, new ,development right next to the, 25 institution. I talked with a motel ownerwho is right next to 74 I I i I I I I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 1 2 3 4 5 6 the institution who stated he had not had any problems with visitors. His marquis in the front says, "Welcome FCI Federal Correction Institution Visitors." He says he welcomes that business and has not had problems with those people. The land values have increased. The developer said they have. She showed me a project they have, it's called 'Bear Paw'. It's 7 a planned retirement residential and golf course community 8 located a half mile north of the federal correctional complex. 9 The Commissioners have had evidence, it's in your packets somewhere, that the number of drunk driving and drug -related arrests have risen considerably since the Limon Correctional Facility opened, and the resultant visitor traffic. i wondered about that. I called the police chief, talked with Chief Trahern over in Limon. He stated that in fact his agency has not made a single drunk driving or drug -related arrest on any correctional facility visitors. He went on to say that visitors have not constituted any major safety concerns. I spoke with, pardon me, Howard Mayor Pro-Tem of Ordway. I talked with him, the compatibility and other issues of facility that was located there recently. that since the Department of Corrections Anderson is the I asked him about the correctional He stated first has a 45 -minute response time, a lot of good people, staff, have moved into the community and are active in civic affairs. He stated that 75 1 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 the offenders do a lot of community service work which 2 benefits the city, that land values have not been adversely 3 affected. A quote from Mr. Anderson was "Citizens don't hardly know the prison is there." It's a non -issue. Now Ordway did have infrastructure problems you may have heard about. When the facilitywent up, could not accommodate the facility, battle with the state on who is enlargement of their infrastructure. their sanitation system and so they got into a going to pay for the That's not an issue in our application, fortunately, and that's another reason that 11 we chose to site this facility in the area that we've 12 described. 13 Adams County Detention Facility in Brighton, a huge 14 facility, 288,000 square foot complex built in '85, serves an 15 average daily population of 550 inmates. To the question of 16 what's the average length of stay, 13,000 unclassified. inmates 17 every year are booked into that facility. That's people 18 who've been arrested from every type of crime from 19 misdemeanors and traffic warrants to the most serious and 20 violent crimes that they may have just committed. In 21 Brighton, an elementary school is located a block from the 22 detention facility. Across the street is a shopping center, 23 an office building complex, and a senior citizen alternative 24 care facility. There's been no safety or compatibility 25 concerns. I. talked with four,people inthe area. No concerns 75 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 I 1 2 3 with the businesses or with the school. in the $150,000 range being built within New development. I spoke with a real There -are new homes two or three blocks. estate developer who's 4 putting up some of those homes and he says that land values 5 have done nothing but continue to increase. 6 The Boulder County Jail, 103,000 square feet, 357 7 beds, 110 staff. Again, virtually identical to the size of 8 the facility that we're looking at here. The Boulder County 9 Jail was constructed in 1988. At the same time, 10 density residential development 11 this area right here, was begun 12 development. It's now in its 13 The developer down there states 14 Park homes was $150,000 in 15 Commercial a medium that's called Noble Park, it's • It's an upscale residential final phase of construction. that the median price of Noble '88 and it's $230,000 today. development, as Ms. Glass mentioned, 16 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: I have a question. When you're 17 talking about the detention facility there, is it marked pe? 18 MR. BRAND: Yes. The detention facility is right 19 here. And then a block, I say a block right here, is what 20 they called Noble Park. 21 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Okay. Thank you. 22 MR. BRAND: The commercial development that's 23 occurring is this area right here. In Brush, they have a 24 facility it's a juvenile facility; a tough facility. It's 25 called the High Plains Detention Center. 175 -bed juvenile 77 1 facility dealing with tough kids from around the nation. This 2 is where states send their kids that they can't handle within 3 their own state. They send them to this facility for 4 treatment and for detention. I spoke with the mayor there. 5 I also spoke with two other members of what they call the High 6 Plains Advisory Board. They all stated that the facility is 7 a positive, non -intrusive land use. Adjacent to the detention 8 center is a manufacturing plant, Morlang Manufacturing. And 9 the Brush School District is right adjacent to the facility. 10 Neither of those developments have any concerns regarding High 11 Plains. Compatibility has not been an issue. Land values 12 have not declined, and community safety has not been an issue, 13 it has not been compromised. Quotes from the mayor, from 14 Mayor Coughlin who also went into this skeptically. When they 15 were proposing this facility, he had all the concerns that the 16 people you're going to hear today have on the compatibility 17 and the safety and you know, my God, you know, nobody's going 18 to develop there, etc. He now says, "High Plains has been 19 nothing but good for Brush." He's tickled that people getting 20 out of Brush High School are able to go to work there or go to 21 community college and come back to Brush to their home town 22 and work there, when they didn't have any possibility or as 23 good a possibility of employment in the past. The. facility 24 just expanded. It about doubled its size, but the mayor still 25 said most new people in town don't even know the facility is 73 I I i 1 I 1 1 1 there. 2 The Larimer County Jail we talked about, and I 3 appreciate Libby Glass coming over. Again, it's a facility 4 exactly the same size as the one that we're talking about. 5 The development of four or five hundred thousand square feet 6 has occurred after the jail was there. Again, it includes a 7 child daycare center. It wasn't mentioned, but the district 8 offices of the Girl Scouts of America is there. There have 9 been no safety or image concerns resulting from that detention 10 center in proximity to the development and land values have 11 continued to increase. 12 That concludes my presentation and testimony. One, 13 that this land use application is in full compliance with your 14 Comprehensive Plan and with Weld County Zoning Ordinance, 15 allowing this land use within the existing POD District. And 16 second, I provide and I hope I didn't overkill it, but I 17 wanted to provide very extensive, factual evidence that, 18 beyond the basic compliance with all the technical 19 requirements this land use, a pre -parole release center, is 20 compatible with other land uses, will not adversely affect 21 land values, and will not constitute any community safety 22 concerns. 23 The independent evidence provided on all those 24 issues were overwhelmingly favorable to the land use 25 consideration in this application. They're not opinions, 79 1 they're facts. Examples given included communities with 2 correctional facilities from minimum to maximum in fourteen 3 different states including Colorado. We provided evidence and 4 statements from police chiefs, from sheriffs, from mayors, 5 from real estate developers, from business owners, and from 6 lay citizens in over 30 communities with correctional 7 institutions. All of the available factual literature and all 8 of the evidence, we did not pick and choose, there were not 9 things that we excluded, there were. not bad things that we 10 excluded. All of the available literature is consistent in 11 saying that a correctional facility is a safe and a compatible 12 land use. I ask you to consider this in your decision making 13 process. Thank you and I welcome any questions or comments. 14 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Are there any questions for Mr. 15 Brand? 16 COMMISSIONER WEBSTER: You touched on this, Mr. 17 Brand, of these pre -parole facilities, to your knowledge, how 18 many of them are there in the United States operating today? 19 MR.. BRAND: I asked that question of a guy in 20 Florida and from his information, he said there were 17. The 21 guy I talked with is with a private foundation and his 22 research had shown 17. I was not sure if that meant just 17 23 private facilities or 17 total. There is one, a relatively, 24 small one, that's operated out of Canon City that provides 25 some of the same basic services that are provided here. 1 i 1 1 80 1 COMMISSIONER WEBSTER: Also, how long do you feel 2 they've been operating? " How long has their program been in 3 existence? 1 i 4 MR. BRAND: Pre -parole, as a concept, is an old 5 concept because it makes sense. You ought to be doing 6 something with people before they get out. What they've been 7 doing up until now is that they've been trying to provide 8 those case management and rehabilitation services within the 9 confines of other, just regular'correctional institutions. 10 They've decided now that it's better to progress people to a 11 facility that just does pre -parole release as their major 12 function. So the concept is old, the actual separate entities 13 of pre -parole release are relatively new, five to seven years 14 I would estimate. 15 COMMISSIONER HALL: You have a letter in the packet 16 that discusses some of the potential for law enforcement 17 inside the facility. Is there, can you explain a little bit 18 how it would work if someone, if crime was to occur inside? 19 MR. BRAND: Yes sir. Because there are concerns 20 about law enforcement. We share those concerns very much. 21 we're out in 'unincorporated Weld County, we're a distance from 22 the Sheriff's Office. There's not a lot of Sheriff's officers 23 that are assigned to that area. First, we're going to have 24 our own trained security staff. Our staff are trained in 25 security issues and we'll be able to detain people.` We cannot 81. 1 1 arrest people, but we can detain them and we will handle 2 almost all on -site issues ourselves. -That's our job and our 3 function as correctional or security officers. The Department 4 of Corrections will have one liaison officer assigned to the 5 facility. That person is a certified Colorado law enforcement 6 agent. All available information shows, and you have 7 information from the Mountain. View Fire District that showed 8 the number of emergency calls, to facilities in Boulder, 9 Larimer and Weld County. Itmight. be around 21-23 type 10 emergency calls. All of the information I've seen shows that 11 these facilities do not demand a. large number of requests for 12 law enforcement. Sheriff Jordan alsoreviewed the information 13 and he recognized that fact in his response back saying that 14 he didn't feel that he'd have an issue with his. agency's 15 ability to respond. So those are the normal situations. 16 Those are somebody breaking into our car out in the parking 17 lot, you know, some issue within the facility that we can 18 contain. 19 Two emergency responses,_ we're talking about now, 20 the unlikely event of.. an . internal disturbance, off -.grounds. 21 evacuation, chemical truck spills or something other.happens. 22 You should be aware that mutual aid agreements and service 23 contracts will be developed between our agency and the Weld 24 , County. Sheriff's Office. They have their own emergency 25 response division, if. you will. We'll also have an agreement 82 1 1 1 1 1 1 with other law enforcement agencies in the area. It's a 2 common, they have standing agreements now for services, but 3 they would be specific to our agency. To that end, I spoke 4 with the Longmont Police Department, I spoke with the Greeley 5 Police Department and the Loveland Police Department. All of 6 them have special weapons and tactics teams and they have 7 available officers for emergencies, whether it's the guy down 8 at the US Motel who is holed up or whether it's a facility 9 such as this, who can and have responded and assisted Weld 10 County. I'm not unfamiliar with the need to establish 11 comprehensive emergency plans. I've worked in corrections a 12 long time. You always plan for the worst type of event and 13 hope and anticipate that'it never happens. I have no concerns 14 regarding our ability to have adequate law- enforcement- 15 coverage, both for'routine and for emergency situations that 16 may arise at our facility. 17 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: Do you have any mutual aid 18 assistance agreements with any of the Denver metro area, like 19 Thornton, Northglenn, Broomfield? 20 MR. BRAND: No. Well, we have not spoken with them 21 at this point. If, when we all get together, when all the - 22 significant people who are in this business, who are in the 23 swat team business and all that, first they'll be involved in: 24 our designdevelopment stage. We will show them what we're 25 -going to build'so they understand what the facility is and - 83 1 what they're getting into both -physically and what kind of 2 offenders we have there, how the population's broken up, etc. 3 If it's determined that we need more enhanced mutual aid 4 agreements, then I would be directed that way. That would be 5 the next logical way, would be to involve those other 6.. agencies, the north metro agencies. But, no, I've not spoken 7 with them. 8 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: Is a mutual aid agreement 9 basically a contract for._service that you would pay for? 10 MR. BRAND: That's correct. First mutual aid 11 recognizes that the Weld County Sheriff's Office is the first 12 responding, agency. They have the responsibility for 13 unincorporated Weld County. Any mutual aid agreement would 14 have to be developed with the Sheriff and then in turn with 15 us. We would have to contract in our agreement, we'd. have to 16 contract for any services. If we would need any of their: 17 services we would pay them on a per -service used basis. 18 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: And I notice also in that 19 letter you said any situation that arised at the pre -parole 20 release facility. What about beyond that facility like two to 21 three mile radius or something? 22 MR. BRAND: You asked the question earlier, 23 Commissioner, and it was a good question. What about our, 24 perimeter ,security:.,. Well, we —have people outside the - 25 facility. Normal correctional practice and what we, would do - 84 1 1 there, we would always have at least one what we call 1 2 perimeter officer. That person's job is to be around our 3 parking lot, around the facility, driving around the adjacent 4 neighborhoods, etc. just to see that there's nothing related 5 to our facility that's going on that we should know. You 6 know, we'll have communication equipment where we can ' 7 communicate with law enforcement, etc. To answer your ' 8 question specifically, though, we really are not authorized 9 off our property to protect the community two, three, four 1 10 miles away. That is not our role. If we see something, and 11 our perimeter officer will be in the community, we're 12 interested in that, we make a call to law enforcement. So. 13 we're more the eyes' and ears and not the, we are not a law 1 14 enforcement, we are not certifiable as law enforcement ' 15 officers ourselves. 16 COMMISSIONER BAXTER: You kind of touched on it a 17 little bit, but, would you amplify a little bit how you would 18 handle an emergency, say a fire. For fire protection, if you 19 had a fire in this facility, how would you handle that? ' 20 MR. BRAND: ukay. First, the building is basically 21 non-combustible. The population is spread into eight 1 22 different living units. We would have a system whereby when, 23 if we ever had, to push 911, 'on the screen is going to show our 24 floor plan of our building and it's going to identify where ' 25 the problem area is. Our fire responding agency is Mountain 1 85 View Fire District. It has a substation -(two miles down the 2 road. They are first called. They are the people, that would 3 be there. We would develop an agreement with the fire 4 district and the Sheriff regarding under what circumstances 5 the fire responding, because they also do ambulance response, 6 would go into the building. Basically, whether it's safe or 7 not. Most calls that you see and some information there that 8 was submitted by the Mountain View Fire District in their 9 study of other calls, almost all of them are medical calls. 1Q They are ambulance calls. So we would first call 911; 911 11 goes to Mountain View; Mountain View responds. If need be, in 12 fact I think it's regular procedure that law enforcement 13 responds also. If, it's a huge enough fire like we have 14 evacuation lanes within the fence where we can confine people. 15 If we have to do an off -grounds evacuation, that's part of our - 16 comprehensive plan. We'd have to work with the Department of 17 Corrections and other detention facilities, other county jails 18 to place the offenders in there in case the fire was so bad 19 that, you know, we had to evacuate one pod which would be 58 20 people or what have,you. Chief Ward may be able to address 21 some of those issues more in depth if you wish. We also, in 22 terms of emergency response or emergency plan, I don't know 23 how much depth you want to go in, but we have -.response squads 24 of our staff. -We also will have a 45 -minute response time. 25 What we need for a facility of this size is to be able to have 86 1 1 1 e 1 1 35 to 40 staff, our security staff responding to the agency 2 within that many minutes, within 30-45 minutes to handle 3 other, you know, situations. 4 There was a question from Commissioner, I think, 5 Kirkmeyer also regarding the, or maybe it was from 6 Commissioner Harbert, I don't remember. Anyway, regarding the 7 fence and what keeps people from burrowing under it. A couple 8 things: One is, the fence is buried at a depth to be 9 determined by, you know, how deep we think it has to be. Next 10 to the fence you can place either real rough gravel type 11 things or black top or concrete, something that goes out about 12 this far so if someone is going to go under the fence, first 13 we have our perimeter security and we have our yard staff, but 14 to go under the fence, they'd don't have to go this far, they 15 have to go that far under something that they can't dig under. 16 That's how it works in the security sense. 17 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: What's to prohibit people 18 from throwing things over the fence? 19 MR. BRAND: That's one reason that we have two 20 fences. We have the 8 -foot fence inside. Nothing's to: 21 prohibit them. I mean, except it' takes a pretty good arm. It: 22 also takes a pretty good astuteness on our part to know what's- 23 coming into the yard. Whenever somebody is in the yard, we're- 24 - going to have at lease two officers out there. = Could it 25 happen? Certainly' it could. Contraband's an issue. 87 1 Contraband, gosh, they got it up some, you know, pipes or 2 something here in the county ;ail. So anyway, it is an issue 3 certainly and, you know, regular, you know, searches and 4 things like that are a routine part of running a correctional 5 facility, too. Also regular drug testing. That's the most 6 common thing they want in is drugs. 7 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Any other questions? 8 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: About your rehabilitation 9 program. The maximum stay is 180 days, is the minimum stay 30 10 days? 11 MR. BRAND: There is no minimum stay defined by the 12 Department of Corrections at this point. We will need, in our 13 contract with the state, to deal with that issue. The problem 14 is it takes a lot of work to get a -person in one day, do the 15 intake and do all the. assessments, and then they take them out 16 two or three days later. That would defeat the purpose of the 17 program. So, we wantin our contract with the state, some 18 defined, you know, limit on the minimum stay..I think that's 19. important. Otherwise, we can't do anything with people in two 20_ or three days. So, but there is nothing defined. - That will 21 be part of our contractual agreement with the Department. 22 CHAIRMAN HARBERT:. What do you feel, for your 23 benefit, and rehabilitating someone would be a minimum amount 24 of time that. they should stay there? Would it be 30 days?. 25 Can.you do anything with_anybody in 30 days? 88 I I I i I I I, 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 1 MR. BRAND: In 30 days we can at least deal with the 2 practical considerations of release. Understand first, that 3 people who are coming there have already been paroled. 4 They've seen the parole board and to get paroled they have to 5 have what they call a parole plan. They have to have a place 6 to go, a place to live. We would help investigate that. We 7 would determine it as a true parole plan, a true address, all that. We can deal with some of the issues, but what we'd be doing there basically would be assessing and referring back to the community. They would not be' able to go through our program. Our program is open-ended. Someone can enter it at any time. It's not like 90 day increments. To answer your questions, I would say that we can deal with the practical considerations, transport the people in, then transport them back to their parole officers 30 days later at least with their feet on the ground, but not to have had the benefit of the entire program. CHAIRMAN KIRKMEYER: So what you're saying is that it would be up to the state to determine the minimum stay? MR. BRAND: That would be up to us and the state in negotiating our contract agreement. The state also does not want people there for a short period of time. • It's expensive for them to transfer and transport people, like from Arrowhead, or you know, somewhere over the mountains or Buena- vista to any facility to have them then later get out two or: 89 1 three days hence. But that's something that we would 2 negotiate with the state. Mr. Waters is here. He may address 3 that issue from the Department's perspective if you so desire. 4 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Would Mr. Waters come forward, 5 please. Is Mr. Waters here? Would you state your name and 6. address for the record please. 7 MR. WATERS: Madam Chair, Commissioners, my name is 8 Tom Waters, P.O. Box 1010, Canon City, Colorado. I am the 9 administrative officer and attorney with the Colorado 10 Department of Corrections and I'm here to address any 11 questions you might have concerning the Department of 12 Corrections' relationship or proposed relationship with The 13 Villa for the use of the proposed facility. 14 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: I'd like to know how open 15 you are to negotiating a. 30 -day minimum stay. 16 MR. WATERS: I don't believe we'd be negotiable. 17 towards that. I think we are looking more at a 90 -day minimum 18 stay for pre -parole offenders. 19 COMMISSIONER BAXTER: Would you address, I know it's 20 been asked, and i KNOW it's on some people's minds, the 21 possible reclassification for crowding reasons or whatever, in 22 a state somewhere else and .then sending them, reclassifying 23 them down or whatever -BECAUSE OF space needs TO a pre -parole - 24 center. 25 MR. WATERS: SO, if i understand your. question 90 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 correctly, solely for the purpose of creating greater bed 2 space, utilizing a pre -parole facility? Let me talk briefly 3 if I can, about the classification system. The classification 4 system is based on certain objective criteria. For instance, 5 such things as the, I'm sorry if you can't hear me. Is this 6 better? Some of the factors which are included in the 7 classification of inmates and offenders would be the nature of 8 their offense, the length of their sentence, prior criminal 9 history, and perhaps and very importantly would be their 10 institutional disciplinary conduct. Whether or not they'd 11 been convicted of a disciplinary offense within the facility. 12 And Mr. Baxter, I certainly do not believe that there would be 13 reclassification made of offenders solely for the purpose of 14 placing them within the pre -parole facility. The Department 15 of Corrections' intent and. THE use of this facility is 16 specifically to prepare offenders for community reintegration. 17 In other words, to prepare potential parolees for moving back 18 into their respective communities and I certainly do not 19 believe this facility would be simply used as idle bed space 20 to make greater room somewhere else. Sir. 21 COMMISSIONER WEBSTER: To your knowledge, how 22 successful do you feel that this program has been, that you've 23 heard about? What's the betterment of saying fewer 24 turnarounds coming back because of this pre -parole type of 25 program? 91 1 MR. WATERS: Well, I can't speak specifically about 2 a pre -parole facility. 3 COMMISSIONER WEBSTER: I understand that. But just 4 in your position what have you heard? 5 MR. WATERS: I would say, I can reason analogously 6 from other programs that we do have. Our standard re - 7 offending rate,recidivous rate is in the mid -30% range. In 8 situations where we can specifically pay attention to 9 offenders and work with them as far as community 10 reintegration, those numbers tend to drop down to the mid - 11 teens. So, for instance, we have a relationship with a Denver 12 organization called Friends in Transition. And when the 13 Friends in Transition volunteers work with our offenders the 14 usual re -offending rate amongst those individuals, amongst 15 those offenders is about 14%, so it drops considerably. 16 Reasoning from that, I would estimate, I would speculate 17 rather reasonably I think, that this program would have 18 similar numbers. Certainly that would be our goal. 19 COMMISSIONER WEBSTER: Thank you. 20 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Are there any other questions for 21 Mr. Waters? 22 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: Could the state at any 23 point change, earlier they said this is a level 2 facility, 24 could the state at any point change from a level 2 to a 25 different type of level 2 or level facility? 92 I 1 1 1 1 e 1 1 1 1 MR. WATERS: No, and there's two reasons for that. 1 2 That could not happen. One is the great impracticality of 1 3 doing that. We're building a level 2, a minimum restricted 4 facility. To upgrade that to a higher security or higher 1 5 custody classification would be very cost prohibitive. If I 6 can analogize, it would be like building a ranch house and 7 then trying to convert it into a multi -family apartment 1 8 building. It would be very difficult to do. The second 9 reason we would not do that, is it would be outside the 1 10 purview of House Bill 1327, the enabling legislation which has 11 authorized us to operate or contract for the operation of a 12 pre -parole facility at this security level. So we would not 13 be doing that. We have no plans to do that. 1 14 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: But you could, you think you ' 15 would not. 16 MR. WATERS: I think as you well know, the state 1 17 ultimately, through legislative process could do whatever it 18 wanted with the facility, particularly one of its own 1 19 facilities. The operators of such a facility, though, would 20 never have to agree to that. And again I want to strongly 21 emphasize, however, that within the police powers of the state 22 there is a lot the state can do. But we have no anticipation 23 of doing anything like that. That's not, we don't have the 1 24 need for that type of facility right now. We have a need for ' 25 the type of facility that The Villa is proposing. 1 93 1 1 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Any further questions? Thank you 2 Mr. Waters. 3 MR. COPPOM: John Coppom again. If I may, I'd like 4 to just add to that question. Can the facility be upgraded to 5 a Class 3, 4 or 5 facility? Loren Bley has already said we'd 6 have to tear down the walls and re -build them bunker style to 7 upgrade those walls. But there really is an answer to that 8 that's just has to do with something that in my opinion is 9 insurmountable. The facility willbe built under bonds. The 10 people who invest into those bonds have a good number of 11 requirements for us to obtainthose bonds. One of those 12 requirements is obviously that we have to have the place 13 insured and an insurance company will only insure it for a 14 minimum risk facility. If we bring in, higher risk offenders, 15 they will not continue to insure it and we won't have our 16 program. 17 Secondly, the bond people themselves are saying that 18 we, you have to have a professional criminal justice agency 19 oversight your facility that's tied.. into other prison 20 administration experts. And we're going to come in every year 21 and we're going to monitor how you're running the facility and 22 whether or not you're meeting the. Compliance regulations of 23 the bonds which is minimum risk. If you're violating those, 24 they're going to forceus back into a minimum risk facility. 25 we would not violate that. 94 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I might also say that the bond people are requiring 2 us to put, to bank, $800,OG0 so that if for any reason this ' 3 facility would, I mean the state would change its policies or 4 whatever and we needed to change the facility, that $800,000 ' 5 would carry the facility for the investors for a period of 6 6 months so that we could make those changes and those would be 1 7 done through the professional criminal justice agency that ' 8 that bond company has contracted with. So we have a lot of 9 safeguards within the way that we insure it and the way in 10 which we fund it that guarantees that it stays minimum risk. 11 With that, our next speaker is Ron Hiatt. 12 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Would it be all right if we took 13 a break? We will return at 3:30. 1 14 (A short break was taken). ' 15 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: We will resume the applicant's 16 proposal presentation. John, did you have another speaker? 17 MR. COPPOM: Yes. Ron Hiatt and then he would be 18 followed by Ann Garrison if she's here and that would conclude- , 19 our presentation. 20 MR. HIATT: Thank you. My name is Ronald L. Hiatt." 21 My wife and I reside at 1405 Willow Drive, Berthoud, Colorado. 22 I am the general manager, property manager of the Del Camino 23 Service Plaza and Truck Wash, Treasurer of the St. Vrain 24 Sanitation District, a partner in.a Super 8 Motel at Del 25 Camino, a partner in Del Camino Recreation, a proposed 77 -acre` 1 95 1 1 paved recreation and RV_park,.area. Our family has purchased 2 and re -sold two businesses to other businesses in the Del 3 Camino area in the last five years. Plus, we have lived in 4' the Del Camino area for four of the past seven years that we 5 have lived in Colorado. Our son, Rick, currently resides at 6 3598 Highway 119, Del Camino, owner of the. Woods and Waters 7 Sporting Goods Store and is a partner in the DelCamino 8 Recreation. My brother, Dennis and his wife Jackie, are 9 managing partners of,the Super 8 Motel They reside in an 10 apartment at the motel and have done so since May 1, 1986. 11 I tell you these facts because the Hiatt families 12 are committed to the well-being of the residents and the 13 business environment of the Del Camino area. The safety of 14 all the people that pass through or live in the Del Camino 15 area is our utmost concern.. It is because of these 16 commitments that I started my own investigation in respect to 17 the proposed pre-release facility. My investigation took me 18 to the cities of Lincoln, Nebraska, home of Nebraska's largest 19 penal complex; Pueblo, Colorado; Delta and. Canon City, all 20 with their ownprison facilities. Traveling at my own 21 expense, asking,, questions of my own accord,, talking to. 22 citizens, political leaders, professional people,blue collar 23 employees and businessmen and women. .I present the., following 24 information. 25 I askedseveral questions.. of each. person I 96• 1 1 I I t 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 interviewed and today I share just a few of those questions 2 with you. Question: Should the prison in your town be 3 closed? The overwhelming response was no. Question: What 4 economic impact does the prison have on your community? 5 Answers, some of them: Jobs, creation of wealth, increase of 6 my sales, the largest percent of our business comes from the 7 prison, and they go on and on. All participants, all 8 participants answering my survey question agreed that their 9 communities and themselves were financially better off with 10 respective facilities located in our cities. Question: Has 11 real estate values decreased because of the incarceration or 12 the prison facility in your community? In Delta, a real 13 estate agent said values and I quote him, "Values in Delta and 14 the communities around us have been rising for the past four 15 years. We are now experiencing the Californians" (and I think 16 all of us on the front range know what the Californians refer 17 to) "and the retirement -age people moving to our community and 18 building permits are on the increase." In Pueblo and Canon 19 City, not as good a picture, real estate values are somewhat 20 static, but the feeling of the respondents was without the 21 prisons the real estate market would be a lot worse in those 22 two communities. 23 The most profound increases in real estate values 24 are in Lincoln, Nebraska. Within two miles where my son lives 25 and within the two-mile radius of the State Prison, a 5% 97 1 increase annually for the past four years was the figure most 2 quoted. Development within that two miles of the Nebraska 3 State Penitentiary is comprised of a new, major shopping 4 center, fast-food restaurants, commercial office parks, 5 churches, new single and multi -family housing developments, 6 one of Nebraska's largest high-tech companies, Information 7 Technology Inc. where my son is employed, broke ground this 8 Fall for their second.8-story office complex. This building 9 is projected to house 150 employees. From the office windows 10 of both buildings, they will be able to view the Nebraska 11 State Pen, in about a mile area of that particular area. This 12 building is projected to bring 150 employees, bringing ITI's 13 employment to 325. Their first and second buildings are 14 within that two miles of the state .prison and have been for 15. over 10 years on building number one. Ladies and gentlemen, 16 I don't believe the owners of McDonald's, Hardees, clothing 17 stores, a new miniature golf course, Information Technology, 18 and new homeowners around the Nebraska prison would be putting 19 their capital ortheir lives at risk if having a prison is 20 such a bad neighbor. 21 I now ask you to focus with me on the St. Vrain 22 Sanitation District. Earlier described by Mr. Nelson and 23 others, the County Commissioners, in the mid -1980's foresaw a 24 great deal of growth coming through the Del. Camino area. One - 25 consulting firm in Longmont estimated there would be 20,000. 98 1 1 I 1 1 I I 1 I I I 1 I I I I 1 I r 1 I I I I 1 people living within a five -mile radius of Del Camino by the 2 year 2000. We're far from that. 3 information, 4 commercial in So, based upon this the Comprehensive Plan approved the area as nature and with the wisdom of a few developers, 5 St. Vrain Sanitation District was born, presented to the 6 County Commissioners and approved, planned, funded 4 million 7 dollars worth of bonds, and built. Economic stagnation set in 8 just as the sanitation district came on line and stagnation in 9 Del Camino remains today. After refinancing $4,500;000 in 10 bonds in 1991, $500,000 of additional debt, not for expansion 11 but to try and remain at a low mill levy so we could encourage 12 development, we now find the mill'levy at 29.99% going up 13 every year. That's 2.9.99 mills that we paid last year. St. 14 Vrain Sanitation District mill levy in 1986, when it was 15 approved and funded by bonding, was 12.5 mills. The mill levy 16 increased to 19.99 in 1992. St. Vrain mill levy increased to 17 29.99 and tomorrow morning the St. Vrain Sanitation District 18 Board of Directors is certifying a mill levy of 34.99 or a 19 66.66% increase in the past two pears. Without development to 20 pay the bonded debt, the mill levy of 39.99 is expected in 21 1995. I might add here, next year, 1994, will be our first 22 $25,000 principal reduction for the 8t. Vrain Sanitation 23 District, one of many to increase on an annual basis. So I 24 think you can see what may happen'to the mill levy. You may 25 even want to withdraw your application after that. In real 99 1 dollars, what does that meanto the Super..8 Motel where I'm a 2 partner? Sewer tax has risen from $4,276 to next year $7,005. 3 One business, $2,729 increase. I have four businesses over 4 there that I'm responsible,.I don't own four businesses, I 5 have four businesses that I am responsible for making sure 6 that those taxes are paid, people. 7 As Treasurer for the St. Vrain Sanitation District, 8 I ask that, you approve the building of this pre-release 9 facility in the Del Camino or in the St. Vrain Sanitation 10 District. It has been said in testimony before the Planning 11 Commission by one of the opponents to the pre-release facility 12 being built at, Del Camino, and I quote, "Not even the business 13 community of Del Camino supports the building of the proposed 14 pre-release facility. Whomever testified before the Planning 15 Commission, and I don't know that person, but you don't have 16 your facts straight. I am sorry., i went out Friday, 17 Saturday, Sunday and Monday of this week to find out if there 18 were basis to that statement. In your packets I have 19 furnished you, the County Commissioners, two pages of 20 signatures belonging to business owners and/or managers in the 21 Del Camino area and out ,of 23 business owners or managers that 22 I talked to personally, three would not sign this petition and 23 two were out of state. As yolLcan seeby their signatures, 24 the Del Camino business community does, indeed, support the. 25 building of this facility.. 100 I I I I I I i I 1 I I I i 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 i 1 In conclusion, if I believed that by supporting the 2 building of the Del Camino pre-release facility, public 3 safety, real estate values or invested capital would be in 4 jeopardy, I would not be supporting this project. However, my S beliefs and my convictions are substantiated by the research 6 conducted by my own self and shared with you today. I and 18 7 other business people in the Del Camino area, respectably ask 8' that each of you vote to approve the building of the Del 9 Camino pre-release facility. With that, I thank you for 10 voting yes.' 11 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Are there any questions for Mr.' 12 Hiatt? 13 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: When you say as Treasurer, 14 for the St. Vrain Sanitation District, are you acting as a 15 representative for the District and speaking for all the 16 members of the District, or is that just your own opinion? 17 MR. HIATT: That is myself speaking only and not a 18 representative of the St. Vrain Sanitation District. 19 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: Thank you. 20 MS. HARBERT: Are there any other -questions? Thank - 21 you, Mr. Hiatt. 22 MR. COPPOM: Is Ann -Garrison in the room, please? 23 That would conclude our presentation. I'm going to wait until 24 the very end to give any type of summary or comments,:mostly- 25 to expedite time. But'I wou-1d ask that if Ann Garrison comes - 101 1 1 in that she be allowed to present her research. Thank you. 2 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: All right, we will agree to that. 3 Are there any questions of Mr.:Coppom-before we stat public 4 testimony? Okay. As I mentioned earlier, that we will take 5 testimony from those who are in favor of this first, of the 6 proposal first, and I have to get these straightened out 7 first, just a minute._ 8 I will call two names. The first name will come to 9 the microphone, the second name will you please seat yourself 10 on the corner right here so that you will be, ready to testify 11 next so we don't waste time waiting for people to come clear 12 across the room. When you testify, will you please state your 13 name and.address for the record. You do need to speak into 14 the microphone clearly as this is a recorded hearing and we do 15 need, everything on tape. The first two speakers will be Joe 16 Tennesson and Dennis Kane. So, Joe, if you would come to the 17 microphone and Dennis if you would come and sit in the first 18 seat here. Okay, you're already there. All right, thank you. 19 He's quick. 20 MR. TENNESSON: My name is Joe Tennesson. I live at 21 1520 13th Avenue, Greeley. I am also one of the owners of 22 radio station KFKA. I. think the one thing that all of us in 23 this room have in common is :that we are very proud of the 24 place that we live.. I think many of, us have worked extremely 25 hard to make certain that we build and maintain a really 102 t i 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 exceptional place for ourselves and for our families and for 2 future generations. And whether you happen to be in favor or 3 opposed to this, I think you probably have that same sort of 4 feeling. And I think if we take that a step further, we can 5 say that we all want those things that are best for our 6 community. And we generally have determined that those 7 include some good jobs, some opportunities for us to earn a 8 good living or to provide jobs for our children so that they 9 can continue to live in this community. I think it's critical 10 that we maintain good government through a good, solid tax 11 base and through the development of new businesses so that 12 that base can constantly be enhanced. On the other hand, I- 13 think none of us want to do anything that would hurt our 14 community, either in terms of the destruction of the 15 environment through industries that pollute our air or our 16 soil, or do anything that damage the safety of those of us who 17 live here or those that we love. 18 Therefore, I'd like to make three brief points as to- 19 why I favor this proposal. And I might say that I have spoken 20 in favor of this publicly, not in an hearing such as this, but 21 over the air at all of the locations where this has previously- 22 been proposed. During those hearings,'we heard very extensive 23 presentations about the economic impact. Ann Garrison, in the 24 Greeley presentation, made some extremely detailed notes about 25 the kind of positive 'impact that this would have in our 103 1 community, starting out with the construction jobs that would 2 build this facility to begin with. Secondly, we have heard 3 time and again the safeguards that are in place to keep even 4 this minimum security kind of facility from presenting the 5 possibility that people who would be dangerous would be simply 6 turned loose on our community. 7 Point number 2. I think in all things that we do, 8 we look to the people who are. doingthem, and I believe that 9 all of us who live in this great western heritage recognize 10 the fact that people who you. have come totrust in.the past 11 you will be able, to trust in the future. These are the people 12 who have done what they said they would do before and they 13 will do it again... We know that. _The folkswho are. attempting 14 to build this facility have an outstanding reputation. They 15 have a great reputation in our community and in those. 16 surrounding it. They have, done what they have said they would 17 do. Their business dealings have been .honest, they are 18. forthright people, thekinds of folks who have made great. 19 contributions to our community. 20 At previous presentations and, obviously we haven't 21 come to that point here, the people who have been opposed to 22 thisfacility generally do so on the basis of. their fear of. 23 some of the things that.might.happen.. In some cases there is 24 a fear that thereputation of the neighborhood will change or 25 that the value of the housing, will go down. In other cases I I I 1 104 1 1 1 1 1 1 people presented their fears that individuals being released 2 by these facilities might cause bodily harm. But in every 3 case we were dealing not nearly as much with fact as we were 4 with fears. And I can tell you that those are very real and 5 people who express those fears are doing so not because they 6 want to be trouble -makers, but because they really do have 7 those fears. Unfortunately, in the world that we live in 8 today, we are constantly barraged by the media and by people 9 trying to sell us things about the things that might happen to 10 us. But it has been my own personal belief, and it has become 11 a part of my personal value system, that we generally are much 12 more fearful than we need be, and that most of the things that 13 we fear have absolutely no basis in reality. And because of 14 this, because the people who have a feeling against this 15 facility have generally spoken in terms of fear rather than in 16 terms of real facts that we can base a decision on, I have 17 become firmly convinced that this is something that would be 18 positive for our community. 19 I know that I, and I feel quite certain the people 20 who are wanting to build this, will be happy to live with' 21 whatever your decision is. But I•ve got a sign hanging on my 22 wall that I look at on a very regular basis that says, "Fear 23 is that little dark room where negatives are developed." I' 24 would ask only of you that you make a'decision based on fact 25 and not on fear. Thank you very much. 105 1 CHAIRMAN.HARBERT: Our next speaker will be Dennis 2 Kane and would J.V. Teague come forth please. You'll, be the 3 next speaker. 4 MR. KANE: Thank you Commissioners. I am Councilman 5 Dennis Kane from Windsor. I was .asked by Michael Brand today 6 to come over here and testify as to what exactly went on in 7 Windsor in regards, to the pre -parole facility and our 8 experience with them. 9 In late February, early March of this year, The 10 Villa came to Windsor and made a presentation on the pre - 11 parole facility and what it would do for Windsor. After the 12 town board meeting was over, the council discussed this to see 13 if there was,.interest in pursuing this. There was interest on 14 the council. The mayor, Tom Jones, appointed.me the chairman 15 of the pre -parole committee. The .committee was an ad hoc 16 committee put together just for this one purpose, to see if 17 this would be a good idea or a bad. idea for Windsor. The 18 committee consisted of three councilmen, the mayor, the acting. 19 .town administrator, and the police, chief._ Now, a lot of what 20 we found out, Mike went over in his presentation. We first. 21 met and our key concern was that of the safety of the citizens 22 of Windsor: What was the. risk to them? The second concern 23 was the location of this. The _third, of course, was. 24 infrastructure, do we,.have enough .of that to take care of 25 this. And, of course, the overall economic impact. We 1 106 1 1 1 1 1 divided those different areas up amongst ourselves and agreed 2 to come back and meet again in a week and determine whether we 3 should proceed as a committee or disband. 4 There was so much positive information that we had 5 gathered, both empirically and non -empirically, that we 6 decided that we would continue this and that we would go on 7 further to answer the rest of our questions. As Michael 8 pointed out, John Michaels, Chief of Police John Michaels, had 9 contacted a number of these facilities, not only in Texas, but 10 also in Kentucky and Out in California. The ones that were 11 most like what is proposed here were in Texas. They are 12 privately run pre -parole facilities. Mike pointed out that 13 there were no problems here, what he did not point out is two 14 of these towns wanted.to double'the`size of their facilities. 15 Originally when this was being proposed, it was almost as 16 though it was a civil war all over again; brother against 17 brother, father against son, on whether'this should go in or 18 not. After the facilities were put up and after those fears 19 were abated and they found out that there was not an increase 20 in crime, in fact our research showed in every case that we 21 looked at, that crime either stayed the same or actually went' 22 down. The reason for it going down, there's a perception that 23 if there is a facility in here, "aCorrectional institution in 24 this city, the perception is that there's more law enforcement 25 officers out there so we're not going to mess around in this 107 1 1 town and we'll go to the next town and rob, that 7-11. So the 2 crime actually went down in most of the communities that these 3 facilities were in. And like I said, we didn't find a single 4 town where it went up. The same thing with property values. 5 There was an exception to that. I believe it was in 6 Washington State, Wallawalla where the property values 7 dropped, but in every other case that we looked at the 8 property values either remained the same or went up. 9 One thing I want to point out to the Commissioners 10 today. There is a. rumor, that the Town Board voted down the 11 pre -parole facility. I'm here to tell you the fact is the 12 Town Board did not vote down the pre -parole facility. What 13 happened after we gathered ourinformation, and we were not. 14 convinced at. this point as a committee to recommend to the 15 Town either yea or nay on this. We still had more 16 investigation to do, answer some of the questions that Barb. 17 had asked earlier, you know, what if the state comes in and 18 tries to change the classification. You know, we still had. 19 those questions to answer., Also, the sewer system. We had 20 those questions to answer., we never got to that point because._ 21 what was decided that would .happen is that The Villa would,. 22 come back, make another presentation and then after this 23 presentation therewould be a public hearing. They did that,, 24 there was a public hearing and John asked for a show of hands_ 25 from the audience out there of who was in favor and who was., 108 1 i 1 1 opposed to this. I would estimate that there were probably 2 about 80% of the people in the 'audience that were opposed to 3 it. And the feeling at that point was, well if there's that 4 much opposition there's really no need to go further. One of 5 the things to point out is there were'a large number, and I 6 can't put a percentage of it, of people in the audience that 1 7 were not from Windsor. I think that's important to know. 8 . Second of all, on a private poll that I took which 9 is not scientific, simply 'coffee. room talk, talking to my 10 constituents and having people come up to me and ask me - 11 questions about this, there were 18 people that were in favor 12 of the facility, 23 opposed to it and 9 of them that wanted 13 more information. So, it was a lot different than what we saw 14' at the public hearing. I`cannot honestly tell you where 15 anybody on the Windsor Town Board sat as far as if it had come 16 there, would they have voted yea or nay. I don't know. If 17 the wastewater facility, if that would have been corrected, 18 ` currently we have to upgrade 'our wastewater plant right now in 19 Windsor. And we're looking at $3-4 million dollars Ofgetting 20 that done. ' How much of an impact 'this - would have had, we 21 don't know. We never got that far. :But if that would have 22 been positive, if we felt comfortable in the state not coming 23 back in and either taking it over or reclassifying it, if we. 24 felt comfortable, if I felt -comfortable there and if the 25' location I felt' comfortable with that, I'd have to`say that I- 109 1 would definitely .have. voted for: it because of. all the 2 information.that.we got, it was overwhelmingly positive, both 3 from a safety aspect of it and also from the economic 4 standpoint.. So that pretty much concludes what I have to say. 5 If anybody has any questions, I'd be more than willing to 6 answer them. 7 CHAIRMAN HARBERT:. Any questions for Mr,. Kane? Mr. 8. Teague and•then Vickie Hays. 9 MR. TEAGUE: Thank you. I'm J.V. Teague. I reside 10 at 1707 26th Avenue Court. in Greeley.. And I would like to. 11 speak in favor of the. proposal that's beingpresented today. 12 Specifically., I wouldlike to address the issue of 13 the quality of the group that's making the proposal. And 14 first of all I would ask the question and answer it - how do 15 I know these people? I'm associated with Lowell -Paul Dairy 16 and we are a supplier of dairy products for. The Villa. In 17 addition, we have, we don't at this particular point in time. 18 but we have on occasions had some people from The Villa who 19 worked with us. Am I comingthrough or am I addressing this 20 thing? Who have worked with us on a release program or a: 21 work -release program. I'm getting confused with what we're 22 , talking about today. From both of these standpoints., I'd like 23, to say one other thing. before I go on to that. ,I am not 24 speaking at anybody's request,. I am here on my own voluntary, 25 effort and I'm not. here because, I ..was requested or any.• 110 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 pressure was put on me or anything of that nature. 2 From both directions that I mentioned, `I have found 3 The Villa to be a real first-class organization, an 4 organization that is being run in a very professional manner 5 and a group that has just been a real privilege to work with. 6 And that's my motivation for being here today. 7 I do have a little knowledge for having worked with 8 them as a supplier of dairy products, of their food service 9 organization, certainly more so than I do the other aspects: 10 And let me assure you that the people that work in this food 11 service organization are good, they are professional and they 12 do a good job. I don't know how much of an expert, but I've 13 seen it go in both ways and ii do think I know the difference 14 between one that's run right and one that's run not. Now, I'd - 15 be the first to say that the people that are concerned about 16 the pre-release facility are not real concerned whether"or not 17 they can run a cafeteria or a restaurant, but I think that's 18 just an example of what they can do. 19 To address the issue of the relationship we've had 20 `where we've had people` working` on a work -release program, - 21 again I found that they did an excellent job. They'have a 22 good program, they carried out a good program with these• ,23 people, and they kept on top of it. In our facility we don't 24 work shift work as such to where everybody -works from -seven to• - 25 three or eight to four and our'ending'times is frequently when - :11 1 we get through and not because the clock reaches some point. 2 The peoplethat wereon work-releasedid not always get back 3 at exactly the time that theywere expected to. When that did 4 not happen,we got a telephone call. They were on top of it 5 and as long as they were still working there, or they had just 6 left and hadn't had time to get there,then everything was 7 okay. But they knew when. the people were not doing what they 8 were supposed to be doing. And they exercised the keeping 9 right on top of it. I think they also, did a good. job there. 10 One other issue I'd like to, address to the people 11 that are opposed to..this thing. When The Villa was first 12 proposed for Greeley, I'm .going. to confess, I had some 13 reservations. First of all, I wasn't sure.I wanted it in 14 _Greeley. And I felt"Well now isn't this about a heck of a 15 place to put this kind of a,.facility" and I say that in quote 16- because this kind wasn't what I thought it was either. But 17 right there on the campus of .the University of Northern 18 Colorado. Let me say that through the years this facility has 19 been there, all of, these concerns that I had have been erased. 20 and they've been a verypositive part of this community, and 21 including the location at the University that I was referring 22 to. 23 Commissioners, I urge you to lend your support to, 24 this .program., I. feel ,it: will be a fine addition to our 25 , county, to our State of Colorado, and something,that_we will 112 1 1 1 1 1 1 e 1 1. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 all be proud of once it gets -going and we get over the start- 2 up concerns -and the start-up issues and so forth? Thank you, 3 and could I answer any questions? 4 CHAIRMAN HARSERT: Any questions for Mr. Teague? 5 Thank you very much. 6 MR. TEAGUE: Thank you. 7 CHAIRMAN HARBERT:` Vickie Hays is our next speaker 8 and then Bill`Meier. 9' MR. BARKER: Madam Chairman I might make a 10 suggestion that you may want to caution the audience that the 11 comments should 'be made to you as a board and no comments 12 should be directed to the audience itself. 13 MS: HAYS: 'My name is Vickie Hays and I have been 14 working in corrections for several years. Part of my 15 experience is in Wyoming I worked for the state hospital in 16 the forensics and substance abuse unit and for about two and 17 a half years. I have worked with a wide variety of offenders 18 from homicide to po§session of contraband or drugs. And so I 19 have seen the wide range of offenders that these people are 20 afraid of. Never once have I felt fear toward any of these - 21 offenders. Instead'what I"have learned is that most of them 22 are normal, everyday people. Some of them come from broken. 23 homes, others from normal everyday families, and some of them 24 from very affluent families.' The -thing that I've learned is 25 that most of them at one point- in their life, had made a wrong - 113 1 1.. choice and somehow ended up in the system. That does not make 2 them bad..people. They are not just a.bunch of terrible, 3 dangerous people waiting, to prey on their next victim. When 4 I lived in Evanston, you know, I;felt the same fear that a lot 5 of these people are fearing for the state hospital because my 6 opinion was it was a place, for the criminally insane and 7 according to the media and television shows and things that I 8 heard from the community that they were just a bunch of 9 walking, mean, terrible zombies., around there in straight 10 jackets and constantlybeating up on the, people that worked 11 there. When_I went to work thereI discovered it was totally 12 different. There were a lot of people there that were having 13 problems and that were just working their way back into 14 society and getting straightened out. 15 I think people are, afraid of what they don't know, 16 and I think that's what this whole thing boils down to. And 17 it's only until you give yourself a chance or. opportunity to 18 become more familiar with their correctional facility and 19 offenders will your fears be quelled. I took the chance to 20 overcome that fear many years, ago and I'm still working in 21 corrections right now and I would never turn back and, never go 22 in a different direction because, this is a. career that I plan 23 to stick with and I feel_ it's very worth while to consider 24. -_this pre -parole facility because we.do need to do .something to 25 change the system to where -.we're not getting overcrowded 114 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 anymore. Thank you. Any questions? 2 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Are there any questions for Ms. 3 Hays? Thank you. Bill Meier is our next speaker and then we 4 have Joe Cox. 5 MR. MEIER: Madam Chairman, members of the Board of 6 County Commissioners, my name is Bill Meier. I'm a resident 7 of unincorporated Weld County. I reside at 14181 Weld County 8 Road 2. I'm here today on behalf of Southwest Weld Economic 9 Development Group: As chairman of the group, I have served 10 for the last four years. This group has been in existence for 11 approximately eight years. It represents the businesses, land 12 owners, utilities, real estate people in the Del Camino, Mead, 13 Tri-Area along I-25. The purpose of our group is to promote 14 and facilitate the development of an economically viable mixed 15 use corridor along y-25 and it is in that regard today that 16 I'm here to ask you to vote in favor of this pre-release 17 facility. Our group feels that it's an economically positive 18 addition to the area and we have a number of reasons -why we 19 feel that way. 20 The primary reason -is because of jobs. We all work 21 very hard through either EDAL, the Economic Development" 22 Association of Longmont, 'or EDAP, the partnership, the 23 Economic Development"Association Partnership in'Greeley. And 24 the to priority of both 'those organizations and of any 25 economic development group, -Ss jobs. We have an opportunity 115 1 1 here to bring up to 110,- jobs that will pay.between-$15,060 to 2 $65,000 per year per employee. .< This is 'an opportunity that 3 hasn't come along in a long time in this area. I've heard 4 over and over that if we'd just wait our turn there would be 5 so much coming this way that we can afford to be very choosy. 6 And my point to you is that the opportunity before us today is 7 a choice opportunity. It's a good company, it will be well 8 managed, and in that regard I took it upon myself to visit The 9 Villa at Greeley, Inc. and I.have•toured it and I understand 10 the administrative relationship between the State of Colorado 11 and the Department of Corrections. I was interested in 12 finding that out for myself onbehalf of Southwest.Weld Group 13 and I stand before you with confidence that once the facility 14 is built that itwill be well-run,.,well.managed and that the 15 State of Colorado will be well served. 16 We believe that the facility is compatible and 17 consistent with zoning and. planning in the area. We believe 18 it will be complimentary to the existing services.. It won't 19 require much new infrastructure, no roads, no sewer, a little 20 bit of a water line, electricity is already -nearby. It will 21 have a very low impact initially in being set. forth. .As it 22. operates, we, believe, it will be, .a very non -pretentious. 23 operation. In other words, it's non-polluting, it's._quiet, 24, it's non -environmentally hazardous, it will operate almost 25._ unnoticed ,by the community and I believe by visitors to 116 I I 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Barbour State Ponds and to people who come off 1-25 and use 2 the services at Del Camino Plaza. It will probably, in fact, 3 be unnoticed. On the other hand, if you do notice it, we 4 believe it will be an attractive, architecturally appealing 5 building to the area, a building such that would attract other 6 businesses. It's not a rag -tag tin shed; it's a multi -million 7 dollar investment and it will enhance the appearance of the 8 area. We further believe that it's the right type of business 9 for that location. There won't be a lot of traffic created by 10 it and it will compliment through the existing services 11 through the use of the food, hotel, fuel, things like that. 12 All those combined, Southwest Weld believes that 13 this is the right time and it's the right facility for this 14 area and we urge your approval of it. 15 While I'm here I'd like to take off my Southwest 16 Weld cap and offer some personal testimony. As a resident of 17 Weld County, I live within one mile of the Adams County 18 Detention Center which Michael Brand introduced to you earlier 19 in his testimony. Each morning I drop my fourth grade son off 20 at Northeast Elementary. That's the very same elementary that 21 Michael Brand offered in his testimony. He, along with 450' 22 . other students, goes to school daily within two blocks of the 23 Adams County Detention Center. As"'a parent, I'm comfortable 24 with that. Might I wish it were further away? Yes. But, 25 ' it's working without incident and along with that; he will go 117 1 1 to school at a middle school that iswithin three blocks of 2 the Adams County Detention Center. So we live not only within 3 a mile of such a facility, but we go to schooland cohabitate 4 in this very facility that Michael Brand mentioned earlier, 5 which is a maximum security facility. And that's why .I feel 6 confident in standing before you in my lifestyle saying that 7 it can work for a community. 8 I'd also like to address property, values. I think 9 all of us in Colorado have experienced a nice appreciation of 10 real estate values. I certainly have. In 1990 I refinanced 11 my home, this same home within one mile of the Adams County 12 Jail. In 1993, about two months ago in August, three months 13 ago, I refinanced again, to take advantage of lower interest 14 rates. During that time my house increased in value 28%. I 15 don't think that that was because of this proximity to the 16 Adams County Jail. On the other hand, that same proximity did 17 not preclude an increase in value to my property and my 18 property is not isolated or, exclusive from other people's 19 values. Conclusion could be that such a facility as this pre 20 release center might not adversely affect property values 21 whatsoever. And, in ,fact if it offers employment, it might 22 surely enhance those values. And that concludes my 23 .presentation. Thank you. 24 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Thank you Bill. Are there any 25 questions? Our next speaker_, will be Joe Cox, and then is Lee 118 I 1 e 1 1 1 I 1 1 l Yoder it the audience? He left? Marvin Dyer. Go ahead Mr. 2 Cox. 3 MR. COX: My name is Joe Cox and I live at 1719 6th 4 Avenue. I've lived there since 1956 and when we moved there, 5 there was only twodormitories across the street from us and 6 then they built two more. And there is no comparison in 7 living next to the dormitories' or living next to the facility 8 they got overthere on'the building. We've never had 9 a minute's trouble. We've never had the police called for 10 that I know of. Or never had anybody bother us or anything, 11 so that's all I got to' tell you. 12 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Am I right, on 6th Avenue you're 13 right across the street; is that correct? 14'' MR. COX: Right across from The Villa, yes ma'am. 15 Right in the middle of the block. 16 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Are there any questions for Mr. 17 Cox? 18 ' COMMISSIONER WEBSTER: What's your former 19 occupation? 20 MR. COX: I'm retired. A long-time ago I worked for 21 Monfort. I worked -for him for '24 years. I was on the police 22 department fore3 years. Thank' you.' 23 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Thank you. 'Mr. Dyer will be our 24 next speaker and Mr. Tom Gonzales,"is-he available? 25 'MR.- DYER: Marvin- Dyer,:.930 Spencer -Street, 119 1 1 Longmont, Colorado. I represent Dyer Realty, the broker for 2 the property at your disposal this afternoon. The New 3 Creation Church, the seller of the subject property, has owned 4 the property. since January of '86. They purchased the 5 property with the intent of building a large church of 3,000 6 plus congregation, that they are considering a ,stateof the 7 :art church facility which would have adequate parking, 8. educational facilities- andaccess- from the entire area. 9 Unfortunately, James Miller' who negotiated the original 10 purchase of the •property,, died.. after a brief illness and 11 following his untimely death, the -New.Creation Church found it 12 necessary to re-examine the plans:to build a new facility of 13 this magnitude -and financial burden to the church that this 14.- project might have on the,congregation as it continued under 15 new leadership. Zoning for the new church was never pursued 16 • and the ultimately decided not=:to build the church on this. 17 land and listed the property for sale. The board of directors 18 - of the church are located- in Longmont as well as in other 19 states. This was not an easy decision for themto -make in 20 selling the land and they, researched within their own state- 21 and everything what property values: were in regards to, prison, 22 or correctional facility, situations before making;a decision 23 to sell the property. 24 The church and ,the board are not developers, nor are 25 • 'they builders, 'land speculators. Their desire is to sell the 1 1 1 1 120 1 1 1 1 1 property. The -church has made a considerable investment to 2 provide water and other utilities to market the property, as 3 can be well -substantiated by the St. Vrain Sanitation`District 4 and the water company. This investment in the property for 5 the utilities and everything completed for the existing 6 commercial industrial PUD district to make the property usable 7 for a wide variety of uses. - The sellers have reviewed the 8 current projects of the pre -parole facility by making 9 inquiries to appraisers and by examining the experience with 10 the property of this nature in other communities. Our 11 research did not indicate any negative aspects, but rather 12 positive, as the value of the property continued to increase 13 equal to other properties in the same location. We did find 14 that this type of industry brought a new and varied` employment 15 base to the community. It also presented an increase in tax 16 base for the county, which many other industries would not 17 have provided as quickly because of investment of nearly six 18 and a half million dollars. 19 Weld County benefits`by-many years, much over 25 or 20 30 years of the investors in this project. They currently 21 operate other correctional facilities in Greeley and Weld 22 County and have been very successful. We' have found that - 23 their reputations have been very well. We felt very lucky to' 24 have a Colorado buyer and one locally in Weld County for this - 25 facility. 121 1 i 1 Research in other localities ,where a project of this 2 nature is indicated, other industries and businesses are 3 making a favorable environmental impact for an industrial 4 park. The investors of the pre -parole facility have qualified 5 financially for the bonded indebtedness of this project in 6 addition to local recognition as responsible business 7 operators in weld County by virtue of their success and 8 productivity in the City, of Greeley and Weld County. If this 9 project is constructed in another locality, Colorado, the 10 state and local governments involved will have to pay the. 11 price for utilities, sewer and water which is a-. large 12 investment, to .have the fund to build the facility, 13 Installation and presenceof these requirements are definitely 14 an advantage for the county and other industries. 15 Other owners of property in the area may express 16 opposition to the proposed pre -parole facility, particularly 17 those with similar land for sale because their property was 18 not selected for this project. There areother property 19 owners who cannot legitimately be opposed on the grounds that 20 their land value would decrease because this is an argument 21 without merit in light of 1 the.. convincing research which 22, indicates the market continues to,.grow after facilities such 23 as the proposed is completed. 24 This project will give a high visibility, of law 25 enforcement or professional security staff in the neighborhood 122 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 i 1 1 I 1 which is expressed by many residents of Weld County. It is 2 not present at this time, perhaps' because of budget 3 restrictions in Weld County: Many residents of the area in 4 attendance at the previous planning and zoning meeting voiced 5 their concerns for needed law enforcement in the area. It 6 appears this project may help implement or help provide this 7 service. It is our feeling that Weld County has always 8 enjoyed an adequate zoning code for industry and businesses in 9 their Comprehensive Plan. Their recommendation of Planning 10 staff on this project has provided the administration with 11 assurance of good research and study substantiating the 12 qualification of this application for the pre -parole project. 13 My office, for several years, has been located 14 within one block of a correction facility and the city jail in 15 downtown Longmont. The City of Longmont has recently 16 completed and begun using the new Safety and Justice Center at 17 a total cost of 17 million dollars to the citizens of 18 Longmont. This includes facilities for processing and holding 19 prisoners. The new facility in Longmont was constructed so 20 that it can, with fairly minor modifications, become a jail. 21 facility with all requirements -for housing prisoners on a 22 longer term basis. Both of these facilities are within easy- 23 walking distance of the library, the city complex, Times Call 24 newspaper, the banks and other downtown businesses which 25 employ and serve many persons 'each :day.. Residential 123 1 neighborhoods are also surrounding this area. I am sure that 2 many of the peoplein this room have completed business 3 transactions and required service near - correctional 4 facilities. We have probably doneso without feeling undue 5 concern that we arenear such a facility, and in fact most of 6 us agree that such facilities are a requirement of our 7 community and society. Thank you .for allowing metime to 8 present .this. 9 _ CHAIRMAN HARBERT: . Are there any questions for Mr. 10 Dyer? Thank you Mr. Dyer. _Mr. Gonzales are you present? 11 Brian Vanbuskirk? Harry Asmus? 12 MR. ASMUS: Commissioners, I'm Harry Asmus. I live 13 at 4461 Pioneer Drive here in Greeley. I have been a 14 businessman in. Weld County for 38 years.. It's a long time. 15 I'm involved in businesses etthis timethat we employ more 16 than 600 employees in Weld County, of which The Villa is one 17, of them. Mr. Coppom and myself and Mr. Brand are partners in 18 this venture of the pre -parole release center and you have 19 heard much today to consider and I want to be very brief and 20 justspeak to the facts. 21 Yes, it is a fact thatthis facility -would employ 22 110 plus people. It is a fact that this facility would 23 purchase more than $100,000 of supplies from Weld County 24 producers. And it. Is a fact that this facility will be taxed - 25 as a private enterprise and many dollars of tax monies will be - 124 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 flowing into the county. It's also a fact that it will employ 2 many people in an $8 million construction project. And it is 3 a fact that this facility will meet all of the requirements on 4 safety and security that is required by the various 5 departments. And it is a fact that we met the county planning 6 department requirements, and you have a letter in your files, 7 their requesting that we've met all of the requirements that 8 were proposed. 9 Now these are all facts. I have been in the 10 corrections business industry for 11 years, and all of it 11 right here in Greeley. But I have seen these young people serve their time, and within 12 come through 13 three years, these same people are coming back to us, some of 14 them serving more time after they serve a time down at Canon 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 the facility and City. very little is being done for these young people out in the correction facilities that the state operates. But this facility is programmed and will be programmed to where we'll be able to help and salvage some of these lives so that they will become employed and taxpayers. And this is very important because the average person today is costing well over $25,000 a year to keep in our state correction programs. And we know that we can salvage a lot of these people and get them back as citizens that will be working in the communities 24 and paying taxes and paying for themselves.` Thank you. 25 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Thank you. Mr. Asmus, would you - 125 1 wait just a moment, please, we have a question. - 2 MR. ASMUS: Yes. 3 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: [Inaudible] the employment 4 base, in both construction and the ongoing, operating staff, where do you see that employment base coming from? 6 MR. ASMUS: I can answer it the best I can. I think 7 John and Michael could answer that.. I think I'll let them 8 answer it. 9 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: Well, I'd like to hear your 10 response. 11 MR. ASMUS: My response would be that it'll come 12 within a radius of about 25 to 30 miles. Now, I don't know if 13 it will be from Boulder or from Longmont, Loveland,Greeley, 14 there'll be some from Greeley. There'll be some from locally 15 from Dacono and Frederick and wherever. I'm sure of that. 16 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: Okay. 17 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Are there any other questions for 18 Mr. Asmus? We have a card from a Deanna Holmes and I don't 19 know, are you speaking for, is this, for? I need to know, are 20 you speaking for or against? 21 MS. HOLMES: ,For. 22 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: All right. Would you like to 23 speak then? 24 MS. HOLMES: Good afternoon,Board and Commissioners. 25 My, name is Deanna .Holmes and• I reside, at 2030 26th Avenue - 126 I I I I I I I 1 1 r 1 1 1 Court here in Greeley. I'm a psychotherapist and I also work 2 with what is commonly known as "a rape crisis here in Weld 3 County. We serve all of Weld County and we serve those that 4 are victims and survivors of sexual assault. And coming from 5 that perspective, from a victim/survivor perspective, I'd like 6 to address this issue a little bit because there's a lot of 7 fear in the. community that these individuals from this 8 correctional facility will escape and rape in the community. 9 Let me give you a typical night for sexual assault 10 in Greeley, Colorado and in Weld -County. The telephone rings 11 and it's either the police department, Greeley Police 12 Department, Weld County Sheriff's Department or the hospital 13 calling us, telling us that there is a sexual assault victim 14 at the hospital or on the way. We respond. Those individuals 15 then are treated, a rape kit is done and that information is 16 sent to the Colorado Department of Corrections. I don't mean 17 the Department of Corrections, the Colorado Bureau of 18 Investigation for determination' of whether there is sufficient 19 evidence. Also it all goes to Weld County Attorney's Office 20 to see if that will go for an indictment or not.-And.coming 21 from the victim's perspective, the victim' goes through the 22 trauma of the rape kit. She is already, andwhile speaking of 23 'she' at this point, because we receive very few male. Most - 24 of the females are the ones who come forward on this. She 25 goes through -the trauma of the rape kit She goes through the 127 1 1 trauma of being disbelieved. She goes through the trauma of 2 being sexually assaulted. She goes through the trauma of 3 being questioned again and again and again by police officers. 4 We ask her what went ,on and the Sheriff's Department or 5 whatever correctional department is there ask. what went on. 6 She goes through all those, then she begins to ask herself, 7 "How did I get into this position?, Am I at fault? Did I 8 , dress. too provocatively? How did I cause this to happen?" so 9 to say, and what happens is, that at the very end of our 10 conversation we.find out who the perpetrator is. And what I'd 11 , like to tell you is that the perpetrator is almost always an 12 acquaintance.. It is national statistics that most of the 13 rapes and sexual assaults that occur in this country and in 14 Weld County are done by your own family members, neighbors, 15 friends, and most of all that ,is rampant right now, is date or 16 acquaintance rape. So the fear, then, that these individuals 17 are going to get out and rape within the community is invalid. 18 And I can't guarantee anything., but you can't guarantee you're 19 not going to go, home and be hit by a car since statistics says 20 you'll be hit more by a car than you would be if you walked - 21 home and rode a bicycle. Thank you. Is there any questions?• 22 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Are there any question for Ms. 23 Holmes? Are there any, other people inthe audience that would 24 like to speak for,the,proposal? Okay. 25 We will go to those, that are against the proposal. 128 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 I 1. i I i I 1 1 I 1 First of all, I believe there is legal counsel present for a 2 group, would legal counsel come forward at this time please. 3 We need to give that to legal counsel, please. 4 MR. DAHL: This copy's for everybody. Members of 5 the Commission, I appreciate the opportunity to be here today. 6 My name's Gerald Dahl. I'm a partner at the Denver law firm 7 of Gorsuch, Curgiss, Campbell, Lockhorn and Grover. I 8 represent the Concerned Citizens of Southwest Weld County and 9 those are the folks with the red stickers out there. As a 10 preliminary matter I really want to personally thank them for 11 coming today and for staying through a day that's been very 12 long and being real patient and listening carefully to hear 13 what the applicant and the applicant's witnesses had to say. 14 I can't tell you that 'we're going to be here 7 hours from now 15 or even 5 hours from now because I don't think we will. I 16 don't think our case is going to be as lengthy as the 17 applicant's, but it's not the briefest of cases either. This 18 is an important matter and it was important to the applicant. 19 It's important for the applicant to put on- a pretty 20 comprehensive case. Due process and fairness means the 21 opponents and members of the public `that have concern with 22 this project also be able to put on a comprehensive case so 23 that you've got the benefit of their thoughts as well. -You've 24 got some reports on what they might' think' from the various 25 witnesses for the applicant, but I want them to'tellyou in 129 i 1 their own words and through me how they feel about this 2 application as well. 3 As almost any good speaker will do, I want to tell 4 you what it is I want to accomplish here. At the tail end of 5 what I've got, I also have the witness list for the individual 6 witnesses that we would like called in that particular order. 7 We understand, of course, just as with the applicant, there 8 will be some additional witnesses after that in the nature of 9 volunteers on that side of the case. 10 What I want to do is describe the legal and factual 11 basis which is thereason for denial of this application, or 12 rather the reasons for denial of the application. Now this 13 will be based on your zoning regulations. You've been having 14 people cite those regulations to you all day and I'm not going 15 to be any different. I'm -going to have to do that because it 16 is those regulations that control and you're absolutely right, 17 it's the green sheet which sets out the applicant's burden of. 18 proof here. It's notthe opponents' burden of proof. The 19, applicants have got to sustain that burden of proof. It's my 20 job, of course, in my. witnesses to do the best that .1 can to 21 point out how the applicant hasn't sustained that burden of 22 proof and I'11 undertake todo that. I want to also,. toward 23 the end, confirm some exhibits in the record because it's 24 important to us that a couple _of exhibits which. we think are 25 critical are made a part of record.. I believe they're in the 130 1 I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I 1 -record already, but I want to confirm that. My material and 1 2 I think, to some degree, the witnesses that will follow me I3 really are only going to talk about two things. 4 I'm going to talk about two things, two key things. I5 Is this a proper application? Can you apply for a prison in 6 the Fort Junction PUD without amending that plat? Can you do 7 that? And you've heard from the applicant their opinion on 8 that subject. That's just critical. Is this a proper 9 application? Can they ask for this use? Is it on the list; 10 wherever those lists might be found, legally as it applies to 11 this property. It's fundamental and I'm going to spend a 12 little time on that. 13 Secondly, is this a good idea? Is this project 14 compatible with the surrounding neighborhood? And that 15 standard, of course, is throughout your zoning regulation. 16 Those are the two things'I want to focus on because I think 17 they are fundamental to the case. Now, I have given you my 18 handout which is largely the. material that I also gave the I19 Planning Commission. And I want to go through it roughly in 20 order, but I certainly won't be reading from it. 21 First, of course, there is the requirement in the I22 zoning regulation that the PUD district not be abandoned. If. 23 you're not built within a year you've got to come in and 24 essentially ask tor 'permission to 'keep that thing alive. 25 There was a radial silence from `I989 through 1993 until there 131 I 1 was an application to extend that., Now ,I understand the 2 Planning. Commission said, ,"Well,_ okay", but I would point out 3 that this is an applicant landowner who sat on his rights for 4 an awful long time. Longer than -the zoning code contemplates, 5 certainly longer. , 6 We get to the second page of my material and -,get to, 7 what for me, is this key use. Can you apply for a -prison 8 here? Can you do it? I don't think you can. Excuse me, 9 that's an opinion. You can'tand,here's why. First, and this 10 is frankly coming out of testimony from the applicant. We all 11 know and it's admitted that. prison uses weren't contemplated 12 at the time, 1988 and 1989 that the Fort Junction PUD district 13 plan was approved. And Mr. Nelson, whowas there and 14 represented the applicant by the way at that time for that PUD 15 application, should know that and he's the guy standing here. 16 and said, that's right,, it wasn't in our minds, we didn't 17 think, that wasnot the intention of that particular zoning 18 activity, the church was still trying to figure out its. 19 options and basically designing zoning for itselfthatmaybe 20 it could later market the property from.. Now that's not to 21 say that it couldn't be in the-platas listed, but the first 22 point to make isit certainly wasn'.t in anyone's intentions, 23 ; in anyone's thoughts. Why is that important? It's,important 24 because what we're being told... now is, well,. prison uses are 25- implied when you rezone., to C -1, through C-4, they're. really. 132 I. i I I I I I i i I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 implied. If they're implied, first I don't agree that, but i:` 2 they're implied, I would certainly hope that they would have 3 been mentioned in that early application. I went through the 4 Fort Junction PUD file, both the Planning Commission and Board 5 of County Commissioners. Pretty skinny, both of the tapes 6 have been thrown away, but what's there is pretty clear to me 7 and I agree With Mr. Nelson, prison uses weren't discussed, 8 weren't contemplated at that time. 9 All right, what exactly' did the Board of County 10 Commissioners approve? What was the check mark, what ticket 11 did they punch in 1989 that would essentially list the uses 12 allowed? I don't have to tell you that'in your PUD system 13 you've got to list the uses that they will later apply for if 14 they are not on the list, the answer isn't apply for one 15 that's not on the list and try to get somebody to say yes. 16 The answer is you come into get the list, amend it, and to 17 add the list to the schedule. If gas stations aren't on there 18 and you want to do a gas station, it's a PUD district, you 19 come in and you amend it -into the district. Sure, it's more' 20 complicated'than that, but that's where we begin. Let's look 21 at the Board of County Commissioners' resolution that was 22 adopted in 1989. It says that the uses allowed will be the 23 uses as listed in the Weld County Zoning Ordinance in the Zone 24 District C -1 through C-4 plus I-1. Uses as listed. It 25 doesn't' say any other unclassified uses. As the code - 133 1 provides. It didn't refer to ,those unclassified uses. It 2 listed uses as listed in 1989 and Zone District C-1 through C- 3 4 plus .I-1. You've got. to find the prison use in those use 4 lists for this application to be proper. If it's not there, 5 they can't amend the application,the plat on the spot here, 6 they've got to go back and submit an -application to amend that 7 PUD plan, excuse me, PUD plat. I think that -phraseology is 8 important, the ustas as listed phraseology, and what is 9 essentially being sought here..is,a rezoning without asking for 10 rezoning, in my opinion. 11 Well, let's ,examine these districts a little bit. 12 I'm over on my page 3. To be a proper application, you've got 13 to find yourself in that list. I- went through .the.. lists. 14 various things appear. prisons and pre -parole correctional 15 facilities, of course, don't -appear. ,I- did the legal 16 research. The applicant's attorney was kind enough to find 17 some errors inthe numbers of my citations and I,fixed-those, 18. both in yours and the one I just gave the guy and i.'m always 19 happy to get some help, but those cases stand for the 20 Proposition that, or the rule that If you have a -list of 21 . things that is specific as the C-1. through C-4 use lists are, 22 - things that aren't mentioned.aren-'t implied to, be in the 23 lists. If youhave a structure,, a zoning structure that 24 relies on a list to control things, ,here's what you can do. 25 It's -sort of a safe harbor, it'sgot.to be there.- Unspecified. 134 1 1. 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 uses. If you're into the listing system, as this county is, 2 by its own zoning resolution, then you've got to stick by that 3 system. And the cases say that. 4 Now, let's talk about the argument that was made, 5 because I want to come to grips with the argument the 6 applicant made and I think you probably understood why they 7 were putting on the doctor, to say'that in his opinion that 8 one of the programs offered here was rehabilitative in nature. 9 One of the things allowed 'in the C-1 through C-4, I don't 10 think it's in every one of them, it's in at least two of those 11 districts, and thusly it's in the Fort Junction PUP is 12 hospital or mental or physical rehabilitation institutions. 13 And obviously the argument' is we're not a prison, we're a 14 hospital or a mental or physical rehabilitation institution. 15 I'm sure that's not quite the argument they're saying, but 16 really both. I think you have to choose because the list says 17 hospitals,- mental, physical rehabilitation institutions. What 18 exactly does that mean? We've' gotten the Webster's 19 definitions, but let's kind of- go through what has been 20 presented to you and since the zoning resolution says, Section 21 5.9 Words and Phrases, we're talking about hospital, mental 22 institution, which are not specifically defined shall be - 23 assigned their ordinary contemporary -meanings. Well-, the real 24 issue is what's the ordinary contemporary meaning of mental - 25 rehabilitation institution, physical rehabilitation - 135 1 1 1 institution, and hospital? And does that match up with what 2 has been described to you today? Fair enough? 3 Okay, what's been described? First, we've got the 4 architect, Mr. Bley, saying you know this thing is identical 5 in at least five ways to the county jail. We've got Mr. Hiatt 6 saying over and over that it's a prison and it's okay with 7 him. And, I'm not focusing on it's okay, I'm focusing on what 8 hethinks it is, what; his impression of what this, proposal 9 is. All right, we've got two security fences which, of course 10 are buried below grade and they're, all of that stuff. It's a 11 Department of Corrections licensed facility, DOC is of course 12 doing the RFP that they're going to respond to, to be able to 13 do this. Probably most important from a legal standpoint is 14 the people there are serving time on their sentences. You can 15 bet that for example, if I'm,sentenced for five years in jail 16. and I go to the pre -parole facility 90 days before I am 17 released, those 90 days that I'm, there I'm still serving my 18 sentence. You serve your sentence in prisons unless you're 19 doing day reporting or. work -release. My feeling is, this: 20 this place is, like no hospital I've everbeen in, with that 21 kind of set of features. It's ,a, prison. But what's the 22 argument that's really being made? Because they want you to 23 accept both issues_ Let's accept that for a minute. It's a 24 prison that offers, we'll say,, I'm not saying I agree, but 25; . it's a prison thatoffers rehabilitative services. Because of 136 1 i 1 1 I 1 1. i 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 that, goes the argument, in the zoning resolution where it 2 says rehabilitation institutions, the rehabilitative aspect of 3 what we're doing means that we qualify as a Use by Right in 4 that use schedule. That has tremendous consequences if you 5 agree with that interpretation. And here's what the 6 consequences are. For example, anything I do in connection. 7 with it, no matter how minor or major, they're saying it's a 8 big part. But I'll bet you they're not saying that's the 9 primary reason they're there. Maybe they are, but the point 10 is they're still a prison. Anything I do in addition to some 11 other use means that I get to, pull that other use along. If 12 there's a use by right for this one thing that I'm doing in 13 the list; example, if you've got, and I don't think it's true 14 in the zoning code here, but for example if you've got a zone 15 district allowing restaurants or delis we'll say and not 16 allowing or prohibiting gasoline stations. I come in, I've 17 got a gas station, I sell deli products. I sell the 18 sandwiches, I'sell the juice.` It's the same argument." I will 19 stand here and tell you, see here's an aspect of my operation 20 and it clearly is a deli. Delis are uses by right. And you 21 know that's really the main reason that people stop, they 22 don't buy that much gas. Your choices I think, faced with 23 that kind of argument, are only two: you can basically come 24 - to the conclusion that prisons are okay in all of the C -Zones - 25 everywhere hospital, mentalor` physical rehabilitation center - 137 1 1 is an allowed use by right, a conditional use, special use, 2 accessory use, probably not that, prisons are allowed if they 3 have this kind of program that was so well -described by the 4 doctor and the other witnesses.I think that has tremendous 5 consequences. I don't think that's right. I don't think it's 6 true, I don't think that's how the zoning resolution was 7 intended to operate. I think words in their ordinary meaning 8 mean you look at the whole ball of wax here and you say we 9 have ,to make a choice. It's either a prohibited use or 10 certainly not allowed or it's an allowed use. Which aspect of 11 this use dominates? 12 I think we've spent most of our time today, the 13 doctor's testimony aside, talking about this prison. And I 14 believe that it'sfair to call it that. Or even a pre -parole 15 release facility isn't in the C-1 through C-4 list either. 16. The PUD District requirements. This is supportive 17 of the argument that I've just made, but the PUD District 18 requirements essentially say that any use ina plan 19 application, which is what you have in front of you, must be 20.. "identical" tothose located and described in the planned unit 2.1 development district plat at Section 28.9. Is this identical? 22 Honestly I don't see an application for example,for in the 23- plan application, I don't see the plan application saying it's 24 a plan application for a hospital or a mental or physical 25, rehabilitation institution. Even if itsaid that, you've 138 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i i 1 1 heard my opinion on the subject, "that I do not believe those 2 are that a prison with that aspect of it should'qualify. But 3 it's got to be identical. And that's kind of the reason you 4 get into writing those uses in the plat anyhow, because 5 they're right. And earlier testimony, in the PUD district 6 there is greater flexibility. So the protection for the 7 county in that context is to make sure that the uses that 8 allow such flexibility are written down so that you do not 9 have kind.of a zoning free-for-all later. The uses have to be 10 identical to the plat. " The resolution requires it. This - 11 proposed use is not identical to the plat. 12 I'm over to my page four and the --point I want to 13 make about due process of law is this: what we are seeing,- 14 processing a plan application for a use that isn't allowed. 15 Prison use isn't allowed. Processing that and approving it is 16 essentially rezoning that property and amending the PUD plat 17 without due process of law. And that's important and if that 18 is done, that's a denial of due process because the notices, 19 and I've reviewed them from your record, the notices both in 20 front of the Planning Commission and this Board, say that this 21 is a public hearing to consider a Planned Unit Development 22 Plan for the property described below and not a rezoning, not 23 an amendment to the plat. ' And if it's- approved, you have 24 rezoned, you have amended the plat,. you have added prison uses - 25 to that plat. The notice provided the public here simply does 139 1 1 not give them the notice of that kind of action and the 2 applicant would probably admit they're not making that kind of 3 application because they believe that the uses are unlisted. 4 There's a -second aspect of the plat amendment that's S being suggested here and I'd like to draw your attention to 6 the bottom of page 5, topof page 6 of my materials. There's 7 another plat note that'sbeen addressed already by the 8 applicants that prior to recording the plan plat, the thing 9 that's being proposed in front of -you today, a law. enforcement 10 authority shall be formed. Obviously this was at the behest 11 of the County Sheriff who wrote this letter which I've quoted 12 a portion of ,In the middle of my page 6, and it ended up as a 13- plat note. ,But_ it says before you record a plan plat you've 14 got to have formed this. It doesn't say before you -record it 15 you've got to have formed it unless: there's another letter 16 from the Sheriff that says it's okay or that the Sheriff and 17 the applicant, have decided that isn't relevant anymore. The 18 point I'm making here, and it's another significant one, is 19 that it is your role and your authority to add plat notes and 20 you enforce them. And I do . not see anywhere In the Fort 21- Junction plat where authority has been delegated by this Board 22 to the County Sheriff, tothe applicant, to anyone else to - 23 unilaterally take a platnote..off and to stand here and say 24 you don't have to worry about, the plat_ note, it's a pre-.. 25 .condition to development, but you may remove it, it has been 140 1 1 1 .1 i 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 removed because we've examined it and 'we feel it's not 2 important. They may well be right on the subject matter, but 3 the point is they are proposing an amendment to your plat note 4 that was important. It's probably better to give other 5 examples. Commonly, I know, you add plat notes for protection 6 of the public. You know, an application will come in front of 7 you and it looks okay except for one issue and you'll require 8 a plat note be put on there to make- sure that future 9 development is controlled in a given way, if it's access, if 10 it's utilities, whatever it might be. Those plat notes are 11 important and they become a part of the zoning package on the 12 property. What's being suggested is that unilaterally those 13 can be taken" off without action of the Board of County 14 Commissioners, and I don't believe that's true. 15 The Sheriff's letter, at that time however, makes a 16 good point. I quote it in the middle of page 6. It says the 17 area is literally becoming en unincorporated city that will 18 demand far more resources and be available under conventional 19 county mill levies. He was saying that 'in aid of his point, 20 that their ought to be an LEA, but I want to look at it from - 21 a kind of somewhat different perspective. We heard testimony 22 earlier, you know, this isn't in any kind of growth"area, it's 23 out in the boonies and that's- how come it's compatible out 24 there. It might not be if it were in an area that were more 25 dense. Well, even at that time, in 1988-89; we've got'county- 141 1 officials being concerned about the density of developments 2 becoming an unincorporated city, is what it said, and I think 3 that's largely true. And that bears upon whether or not, even 4 if you go to the second issue,_whether or not it is compatible 5 in this area. 6 The Zoning Ordinance itself, the zoning resolution, 7 imposes additional requirements. I notice that, for example, 8 off -site road impacts have to be addressed. The applicant has 9. said all of the roads are private, we don't have.any off -site 10 road, public road needs, desires, problems. On page 7 I've 11 quoted to you a letter from the Department of Transportation 12 which is in your record. I've gone through the record and. 13 it's there. Basically saying, well you know, the Department 14 of Transportation has not made a commitment as to the 15 auxiliary lanes necessary_to_serve development along the state 16 highway. And the issue of who's going to construct that 17 remains unresolved. Wehave the applicant saying this 18 intersection, and I'm quoting, "will be well-built" so don't 19 worry about added traffic impacts and, therefore, we shouldn't 20 have to satisfy any traffic concerns at this stage because the 21 State Department of Highways is going to, Transportation, 22 .excuse me, is going to worry about that. We all know the. 23 state of that intersection, now, especially at noon time. I 24 haven't heard any testimony or facts in the record that say 25 when exactly Highways is going to get around to solving that_ 142 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 problem, but meanwhile the proposal is to exacerbate it, at 2 whatever level of trips, more than what are taking place now. 3 Compatibility of the project with the Comprehensive 4 Plan, the affected community. This is the second of the two 5 big points I said I wanted to make. Other witnesses from our 6 group will be making' points with respect to compatibility as 7 well. But what I would like to do is review briefly; because 8 of course this is a requirement, they've got to prove 9 compatibility if you even decide they can apply. They've got 10 to prove compatibility along with the other criteria. And 11 they've made their best argument -on that subject. But I want 12 to review some of the evidence that's in the record already. 13 And in that stack of files, wherever they ended up, that I 14 reviewed in your offices yesterday morning, I think, 15 afternoon, that has all of this stuff in it. And I want to 16 tick off a couple of important things that are there. 17 First, something that the applicant has not mentioned a 18 word of yet today, although Mr. Bley told us who said -yes to 19 this application, he didn't say who said no of course. The 20 Tri—Area Planning Commission has recommended'. denial -and there 21 is a letter in'`the record on that subject. Your own Planning 22 Commission has recommended denial and that evidence of that 23 action is in the record. And for fairness, while we're 24 talking about who's recommended saying yes, we need also to 25 mention who's recommended saying no. And those two planning • 143 1 1 commissions, I think, are significant.- They are charged, 2 largely, with the job recommending whether -something is 3 compatible.or not. They are essentially your advisors on that 4 subject and you can take or .leave -their advice as you must do 5 as elected officials, but their, advice is very important and 6 it's -in the record. Now you also -have a lot of letters, I: 7 think there's at least. one file that's nothing but'letters, 8 and I've gone throughthose, ,I'm sure you have. I didn't 9 count, I think they're probably -four -to one against, in that 10- neighborhood, -maybe I'm wrong, maybe it's three, -to -one, I- 11 don't think it's less than-tha.t.,_The point I'd make about the 12 - opposition letters in -that file is this: They are not mass 13 - produced. Individual people sat -down and wrote those or typed 14 them or telephoned -in in each and every case. And honestly, 15 I represent local governments, and we oftenget,-you,know, 15 16 letters, but they're all the -same, even if they're all typed 17 up, they all came -off the, same typewriter. I think that the - 18 depth of feeling about this in, opposition is shown -in those' 19 letters. As well in- the file, in the record,., there is a 20 people's petition,, I -think;-in,-between 1,400 and 1,500 21 -signatures- opposing- this -facility and I think that's 22 significant and it's, something ,,you have to. take into 23- consideration. Now, there is a:map, and you can bring that 24__ up,. to make the letters and,,thepeople's petition sort of 25 visually -real as I'd„like;to show„you,,a- picture_of -a.-flower 144 I 1 1 1 bed. No, I'm kidding. 1 2 CHAIRMAN, HARBERT: Are you aware that this has, if ' 3 you show it to us, it has to be admitted as an exhibit? 4 MR. DAHL: Yes, it's yours and r want it`to be, 5 absolutely. Can we just set it right there. 6 What we have done, and I'd like this to have either ' 7 letter A or 1 for opponent's exhibits. What we have done is ' 8 we have gone to that 1,400 or 1,500 signature petition as well 9 as people who have written letters and people who have 1 10 contributed money and joined the Concerned Citizens of 11 Southwest County cause and we have identified for you on the ' 12 map the properties that they own and those properties are in 13 blue. And then the proposed facility site is in pink. I 1 14 think it's important for you not to just get a stack of what 15 are clearly petitions that, it was easy, you just signed one 16 line. But you also got a bunch of letters people had to write 17 and it's important for you to see where those people are in 18 your county and the extent to which they're distributed and ' 19 where they are and just the impact of knowing there's a lot of ' 20 people out there that have a real concern about this project. 21 So that's Exhibit 1 and'I will leave it here and it will be ' 22 submitted. 23 MR. BARKER: Actually it is Exhibit 6. ' 24 MR. DAHL: Six, fine. Six it is. Just leave it 25 there, that's good. 145 1 1 While I'm on the subject of exhibits and; just to 2 give you.a precis of where I'm -headed, I'm closing in on my 3 piece. While we're on exhibits,_I want to make note of but 4 not give you, because they're already in the record, but make 5 note of some exhibits that I believe are critical to both of 6 the two issues I've raised: the compatibility question and, 7 more fundamentally, can they do this, can they, is this a 8 proper application, can you apply for a prison use where 9 prison uses aren't .listed? ..And .those exhibits or those pieces 10 in the record are your, the resolution of this. Board. March 8, 11 1989, that's one of the earliest ones creating Fort Junction 12 PUD plan, of course.. The plat.itself by recorded February 13, 13 1990, that plat of course liststhe, uses C-1 through C-4, it. 14 doesn't list..prisons and the. LEA has to. be. formed before plat 15 approval note is in that exhibit. There's the memorandum' from 16 the Weld County Sheriff December. 20, 1988, that's the 17 memorandum that says this-is_turning into an unincorporated 18 city and an LEA ought to be formed first. That, on the 19 subject of just density and the nature., of this .area. All of 20 the letters which .havebeen.mailed, both to the, Planning, 21 Commission and to this Board, because that I,think gets to the 22 heart of what the people represented by the blue there are 23 concerned about. The people's petition we've talked about. 24 And this map, Exhibit 6. 25 Before I go to the witnesses,, the conclusion that I 146 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 l have is everyone has cited you Section 28.13. That's on the 2 green sheet. That's the list of things the applicant has to 3 do. Something that's, both of the points that I have made are 4 on that list a couple of different times, but the applicants 5 got to show you that the proposal, among other things conforms 6 to the PUD District in which it's located. Applicant can't do 7 that here. The reason is that district doesn't allow this use 8 and that is the first argument i raised. But if this district 9 does not allow the use, if you believe as I do, that you can't 10 take a mixed use which is primarily a prison, but offers other 11 functions, rehabilitation services, you can't say that that 12 becomes a rehabilitation service as allowed use by right and 13 pull, you know the tail can't wag that dog. It's got to 14 conform to the PUD District plat. It doesn't, by virtue of 15 that. They haven't satisfied that requirement at point one 16 and point two, and they have to satisfy all of them. 17 The other major point I made is that it has to be 18 compatible with the surrounding community. That's the 19 evidence in the exhibits that I kind of wanted to detail, and 20 the testimony that you'll hear. 21 Before going into the witnesses, I'd like to make a 22 couple points about witnesses and about opinion testimony. 23 We've heard a lot today, that well you know, their stuff is 24 opinions and don't listen to it or at'least listen to it with 25 a jaundiced ear. I kind of think that an opinion is something 147 1 1 that the other guy says and a fact is something that I'm 2 presenting, because I think it's fair to say that both sides 3 here are going to have opinions.. Heck, I heard Mx. Bley say 4 that in his opinion this application fully complies. And of 5 course it's not as easy as,that. That's not a fact, it's an 6 opinion. It's probably a well -reasoned opinion from his 7 perspective, but it's still an opinion. Literally everyone on 8 both sides are going to tell you_, in_ my opinion I think this is 9 true or not. You have to judge, of course, the credibility 10 and the weight of opinions and I know you do that all the 11 time, but I want to dispel the notion that unless you're some 12 guy hired from Denver like me wearing a suit, that what you 13 have to say, if it's couched in the form of an opinion, it's 14 not important and I feel strongly that it's the people that 15 are going to follow me thatare more important in terms of 16 what they have to say on that subject. And there are a lot of 17 suits up here, but I think it's important, and you will hear 18 from the people whose lives are, going to be affected by what 19 is being proposed. 20 I am also a believer that to the degree you are 21 afraid of or concerned about something, you shouldn't be made 22 to feel ashamed that you feel that way and that you shouldn't 23 be made to feel ashamed that you are_. coming here and saying 24 that you fear something. And I firmly, believe that if any of. 25 the witnesses that are going to follow me say they are afraid 148 1 1 1 1 1 1 e 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 of something happening, that's "a, fairly legitimate thing for 2 them to say to you and I think it's something that'is'fair for 3 you to listen to. 4 I have here, can hand it to you this time, the 5 list of witnesses that will present, along with their sign-up 6 cards in order, and I think -there's some extra copies of that 7 witness list if Madam Chair needs•them. However, because of 8 the time, and I 'know it's tough to accommodate various 9 witnesses, Mr. Leroy Clark, who is the first witness, had to 10 leave. He came in here, I told him to get here at 10 and stay 11 till we need you, but he had' to leave. So I would make two 12 requests: one that I can tell you what he was going to say. 13 I've got some, points from him,' andlastly that if other 14 witnesses for the applicant, in the form of Ms. Garrison show• 15 up and that's fine, I would ask that the opposition have the - 16 same right that applicants did which is to be able to present 17 a coherent, cohesive presentation and not to have it 18 interrupted. We certainly, I suppose I could have put Mr. 19 Clark on and said he's got to get on now in the middle of 20 their presentation, I`suggest that we be allowed, the persons 21 opposing ought to be allowed to complete a sort ofpackage 22 presentation to you"'because we 'have sat very' carefully and 23 patiently listening to a similar package and we both have that- 24 right. 25 Mr:' Leroy Clark is a long -haul truck driver and I 149 1 1 know it's going to be tough for you topretendI'm a long -haul 2 truck driver. But,. hey. His points are real short and long - 3 haul truck drivers just say it in a few words I guess. 4 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: May I ask ? Y you a question. 5 MR. DAHL: Sure. 6 COMMISSIONER-KIRKMEYER: By not being interrupted, 7 what do you mean. by that? 8 MR,. DAHL: ,Oh, in terms of the scheduling of Ms. 9 Garrison, 10 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER:.- You don't want us to 11. interrupt you with Ms. Garrison? 12 MR. DAHL: Yeah, I think that 13 CHAIRMAN'HARBERT: .No, we. won't do that. 14 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: But we can ask questions of 15. you? 16 MR. DAHL: - Oh, absolutely. ,That wasn't what I was 17 talking about. The applicant had said when she comes in can 18 we put her on, and that's fine, but you know, I'd kind of like 19. to just get our case on as a unit. 20 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: We will follow in order so that 21 you can present your whole case and if Ms. Garrison does come- 22- in, she will speak before the rebuttal. 23 - MR.- DAHL: Otherwise, interrupt away.. The.points 24 that Mr. Clark made, and I've got his written material, but I 25 also spoke with him.. And his points are .these and I think are 150 I 1 e 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 very important. A truck driver's home is his home away from 2 home and the places for that person to stop really are 3 limited, he said, for a number of reasons. And I'know one is, 4 you know, where can you store a truck, you can't just pull 5 into any motel. They really are considerably limited. Del 6 Camino is one of the places that truckers can stop. Mr. Clark 7 lives, I think in Longmont, and you know, he wanted to make 8 the point that the people, a truck driver, for example, that 9 will be stopping at that location, is a Special kind of victim 10 because they often carry a lot of money often in the form of 11 cash just for the kinds of -deeds that they have. They are- 12 also transporting a lot of valuable stuff, whatever it happens 13 to be in that truck. And they are a potential class, but 14 honestly I don't think the rest of us really think of that 15 class of victim, you know, but they really are a potential 16 target. And his point is I'd -like to feel secure. He related 17 to me basically his experience with truck stops that are near 18 prison facilities and he indicated he has been approached at 19 all hours of the night by -people offering all sorts of `'things 20 and threatening all sorts of things. And as a truck driver- 21 that's sitting at a truck stop down here; idling in the middle 22 of the night,`I-can understand his -need to be'secure."'And he- 23 has pointed out in a couple of places, in a couple instances 24 where he has felt less .secure because of the presence of a- 25- prison facility nearby. His -last -point is that I would like: 151 to feel more secure and. I know .he -'said that from the _heart., 2 I very..much appreciate your time, your patience and 3 it's an important process and we very. much appreciate your 4 giving it the attention you are. If, Madam Chairman, with 5 your permission, I would just suggest that you would go ahead 6 and call the other names. Once you've gotten through Frank 7 Canape, that is our list -of witnesses and I dare say there are 8 some others. I'd be happy to answer any questions, however. 9 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Are there any questions ;for Mr. 10 Dahl? 11 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: I have a question for you. 12 In your letter here, basically, you're describing a pre -parole 13 facility as a prison use. Could you define a pre -parole 14 facility for me and would you also outline for me anywhere 15 where you have seen pre -parole facility defined as a prison? 16 MR. DAHL: I guess the definition of a pre -parole 17 facility that I'd rely upon would. be the one advanced by the 18 applicants -here today. I wouldn't quarrel with their 19 .definition of the.kinds of activitiesthat take place, let me 20. back up, the people that are there,and why they're there. 21 They are serving .a sentence but they have.. been approved for 22 release and they don't quality for community corrections. 23 These are all things the applicant has. said. But I think 24 they're real fair descriptions, but they are serving that 25 sentence., I'd emphasize that as a part ofmy definition. The 152 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 1 1 i 1 I 1 1 1 1 applicants didn't really, but I would, because they're serving 2 a sentence and if it's five years and they're short 90 days, 3 the days they are in this facility are part of that five 4 years. And I certainly would not quarrel with the fact that 5 during that time, to the extent possible, they receive 6 rehabilitative instruction; however, I do not believe that 7 that rehabilitative instruction aspect is necessarily designed 8 or is designed to be successful. I heard Mr. Coppom or was it 9 Mr. Brand, say we do the best we can you know while they're 10 there. But you know that's it. We 'don't pretend to 11 completely fix these people and maybe they're there for 90 12 days, you hope,` maybe it's less amount of time, in other 13 words, the services that are offered while they are' there. 14 But that's very different, isn't it, than going to 'a 15 rehabilitation center with a specific problem and you're 16 enrolled in a specific program for a specific period of time 17 and there are certain tasks and; you know; to graduate from 18 the program you've got to do it. Those things I think are 19 true of pre -parole. You've got people finishing their 20 sentences that have been approved for release that don't 21 qualify for community corrections' and they do, they are 22 offered these services. Now there may other descriptive 23 terms that the' applicants would suggest, but I think that to 24 me this pre -parole, it's not in the zoning code` of course, as 25 a defined term. 153 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: Do you think that the act 2 itself, that is also included inn -our packet, do you think it 3 defines a pre -parole facility as a prison? Is that listed 4 anywhere in here? 5 MR. DAHL: The state statute, I don't have it right 6 to hand. COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: 90-1327? 8 MR. DAHL: I'd have to pull the statute and see if 9 90-13? 10 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: House Bill 90-13-27. 11 MR. DAHL: Okay, Yeah okay, House Bill. I'm sorry, 12 I'd have to see it to see if there's a definitional section in 13 there. 14 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: I guess I'd like to ask along 15 with that of ,what your definition would be, then of an 16 institution. 17. MR. DAHL: I think the modifier here is important.. 18 It's got to be and your code says, in fact let .me get it, 19 because that's I assume the point of your question, 20 institution as it is written in the zoning code. The way the 21 zoning code lists it is in all caps "HOSPITALS, NURSING HOMES, 22 AND MENTAL OR PHYSICAL REHABILITATION CENTERS". The 23 institutional language comes from I think the comp plan. But. 24 when we're going, to what applies here, which is the uses 25 listed in these C -Zones, they've got to say they're mental or 154 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1� I I I 1 physical rehabilitation centers. I believe that you have to 2 read that whole sentence together, "Hospitals, nursing homes, 3 and mental or physical rehabilitation centers" and to me that 4 conjures up the hospitals and related facilities, activities 5 or institutions or for lack of a better term, businesses that 6 provide those services primarily if not exclusively. It 7 doesn't conjure up, for example, an employee fitness center in 8 the Gates Rubber Company 9 of the equipment, which 10 psychiatrist and a nurse 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: Then maybe you could define 19 rehabilitation center. I mean I know they made an attempt at 20 it, and I guess I'd like to hear what yours is. 21 MR. DAHL: There are any number of them. They say 22 mental or physical. To me, it's a center that offers that as 23 24 25 plant, which fitness center has all fitness center has a doctor and a on duty. No. What I'm saying is that the Gates Rubber Company plant that happens to have the employee wellness center with all these people on staff is not what is meant, I believe in the zoning code here, as a physical rehabilitation center. I think it's the Gates Rubber Company plant and it should be classified for zoning purposes with respect to what they're making - tires, or whatever it is. its primary product. coercive. I don't think physical rehabilitation And I believe also that it's non- that you're sentenced to a mental or center. It's; you know, all we have 155 1 is the language of the code, but it does control and it's a 2 real fair question to ask, well what is a physical or mental 3 rehabilitation center? Could this be it? I really mean it 4 when I say that what I thinkyou each have to do is decide 5 that the rehabilitation aspect of any use presented is so 6 overwhelming as to become the use, and I don't believe that's 7 true here. I don't believe that's true here even close, even 8 close. This is going to be a part of the state correctional 9 system, and inmates are serving time there and they may or may 10 not get a full course of rehabilitation as the applicant has 11 admitted. The rehabilitation center argument Mr. Brand 12 .described in front of the Planning Commission in this room a. 13 couple months ago as his fall -back. It's more important to. 14. him now. But I. still believe that the heart of the question 15 you're _ asking Commissioner is, for me is, does the 16 rehabilitation work of this _thing envelope everything else 17 such that it's prison aspect is really kind of incidental and 18 accessory? _I don't think those two fencesand the guards and 19 the fact that these are inmates serving time before they are 20 released are incidental. I think that they are the main 21 reason and I think that helping people readjust to the 22 outside, while.a really important prison function here, is a 23 prison function in this context. It's .not .a rehabilitation 24 function where.I can go with, an .auto injury, go to a. 25 rehabilitation center and get. my knee working again. 156 t I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 COMMISSIONER BAXTER: "I realize it's a matter of 2 semantics really, but I like asking questions of lawyers. Is 3 there any way that you can, you are getting to the point of 4 that they are definitely imprisoned. Is there any way you 5 could characterize pre -parole in your own mind as early 6 restricted release in any way? That they are restricted to 7 the fact that they have to go to this facility, but they are 8 actually released? 9 MR. DAHL: 'I don't think so. For a couple of 10 reasons. Just from listining to the'applicants'this morning.:' 11 It's a lock -down facility. There's no real release aspect of 12 this facility at all, and in fact that's terrifically 13 important to the applicants and they've made that point to you 14 15 l6 17 18 19 20 21 which are terrifically important to the applicant -to reassure` 22 you that the place will be safe. You can't have that one both 23 ways. They're still in jail. 24 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Are'there'any other questions of 25 Mr. Dahl? Okay, I'guess we will begin tocall'your list of - many times in the last seven hours. You know, don't worry. These people never get out. And what's the phrase they've used? No escapes. You don't'escape if you're released already. You know, I just, I'm using semantics too, but that was the basis of your question and in really thinking about it, no. No, I really do not believetthat this is a release or early release. There are way too many indicia of security, 157 1 speakers. We will follow the same processthat we had a while 2 ago. I will call two names. The first one will speak and the 3 second one, if you will be available to speak next. The first 4 one is Dennis Tomline and the second one is Kathy Neiley. 5 MR. TOMLINE: Good evening,, my name is. Dennis 6 Tomline. I'm vice president of a company called Specialty 7 Products and I'm, here to speak against, the proposal. 8 Specialty Products has made a large investment in Weld County 9 and that can be seen by our recent. building of our facility 10- . which. is over 40,000 square feet. We also employ 39 people. 11 Actually it isn't real recent,.it's goingon four years now. 12 We would not have probably built a prison in this particular 13 area, or a building in this particular area, had we known a 14 prison was going to be built. We are interested in the.growth 15 in the area and this can be seen by us working together with 16 the Weld County Chamber and the. Longmont Chamber and holding 17 an open house which we had about two years ago. We feel that 18 a prison will scare people away and detract future growth from 19. the area, which is what nobody wants to see. We are here now, - 20. we.don't plan on going anywhere, but we want to protect our 21 investment. 22 We also have some Concerns about the people visiting 23 these people, coming down the highway, seeing a nice facility_ 24 on the side of the_road. Even though the Weld County Sheriff 25 Department does an excellent job, who's to say that they could 158 I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 be there in the length of time that it would take to respond 2 to a call. That is a concern to us. And we also have some 3 employees who work late and their safety is an important 4 issue. 5 Thirdly, and my last point, is the interchange 6 that's been brought up -- 119 and I-25. We combat the traffic 7 mess there on a daily basis and in the summer it's real bad. 8 And we think and have talked: to the State Highway Department 9 and it appears that any major improvements that would improve 10 that are well down the road. And if this facility were to be 11 granted permission to be built; we feel it will add to the 12 additional traffic mess in that area. Any questions? 13 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Are'there any questions for Mr. 14 Tomline? 15 COMMISSIONER KIRENEYER: I would just add the 16 interchange on Highway -119 and I-25 is due to be constructed 17 within the next two years, and I think they've put S10 million 18 dollars towards the project; $2 million in 1994 and the 19 remainder $8 million would be in 1995. And that is in the 20 State Transportation Improvement Plan and it is purported to. 21 happen within the next two years. 22 MR. TOMLINE: Could that be postponed or canceled. 23 like it has in the past? 24 COMMISSIONER-KIRKMEYER:`At this point, no, they've 25' already done some of the preliminary engineering; E and A's: 159 1 1 type things, and as far as. I -know we are definitely pushing 2 for it, the county is, and its in that program of projects and 3 its being funded at that level at this present time. The only 4 way it would be pulled is if the county would agree to that 5 and if our district region engineer for the State Highway 6 Department or the Department of Transportation would, agree to 7 that. 8, MR. TOMLINE: But the beginning of that is two years 9 away? 10 COMMISSIONER KIRKMZYER: No, the beginning of that, 11 they've already done some of the' engineering for that project 12 and the beginning ofthat would be within the next year. 13 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Well, actually, they've already 14 begun some of the construction. 15 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: Well, they've started 16 construction on Turner Blvd.;, which is supposed to be done 17 here within this month and if its not they have some other 18 things. 19 MR,. TOMLINE: Yeah, I think that's almost finished, 20 but whether that's a real improvement or not, you ought to 21 drive it and see. 22 .COMMISSIONER WEBSTER: May I ask where your facility 23 is in relation to the Interchange?.. 24 MR. TOMLINE: We're.about.,two miles south of the I- 25 25 and Highway,119 on the east,...off the east frontage road._ 160 1 I i t I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 I 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 One mile. Maybe it's because you sit there for 20 minutes 2 before you get through the light, I don't know. It's fifteen 3 or twenty minutes, so it seems like two miles. 4 (MULTIPLE COMMENTS] 5 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Thank you, Mr. Tomline. Kathy 6 Neiley will be next and Conrad Hopp should be ready. 7 MS. NEILEY: Sorry, I've got a lot of stuff. Sorry 8 about the preparation time. My name is Kathleen Neiley. I 9 live at 5416 Weld County Road 36. And from 1985 until last 10 summer I was an investment banking employee. I was an 11 assistant vice present in the institutional sales department 12 of a real estate financing firm in Denver. I was also a 13 partner of that firm. We specialized in commercial real 14 estate financings and we were one, and still are, I don't 15 there any longer, but still are one of the nationally ranked 16 firms in housing finance in particular. We have dealt and 17 traded in prison bonds and it is to that that I have addressed 18 the majority of my research. 19 I am a registered' representative. I do' hold a 20 Series 7 and a Series 53 designation. Series 7 is a general 21 securities registration and Series 53 is the State Blue Sky 22 Securities Registration Law. 23 You are the first investors in this project and as 24 such you deserve the same' information that potential bond 25 holders will be requiring. The Villa has' a serious' disclosure 161 t 1 problem in the presentation they gave here today and the one 2 they gave the Planning Commission two months ago. That has to 3 do with the financial risks and they are many and they are 4 severe with financing of -private prison issues. I have 5 substantiated all. of my facts today and they are facts from 6 two major sources. Bond Buyer is a publication published 7 every business day in New York. It is basically the Bible of 8 the municipal securities .industry.. -It costs $2,000 a year for 9 a subscription and nobody in the.financial market makes a move 10 without it.: It is basically the. watchdog for the industry. 11 They sent me 17 articles on private prisons that they have 12 written .since, 1989. 13 The other major source that I'll be referring to is 14 a report, a research report. published. in September, released 15 in October by. John Nuvene and Company. If you're unfamiliar 16 with John Nuvene and Company,,. I've entered into an exhibit - 17 their latest 10K quarterly reports, prospectus and what not. 18 They currently have $27 billion dollars under management. 19 They have over one million investors and last year they won 20 nine national awards for their research. They do not own any 21 prison bonds. They, have no vendetta in publishing this 22 report. They saw this as a- service to the investment - 23 community. There was very little information being published- 24 about these bonds. They saw that as a real disservice to the 25 investment community. 162 I 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I I I I I 1 1 I 1 In 1989, six' counties in Texas listened to 2 presentations by a developer similar to that that you have 3 heard today. In 1991, all of the -prisons were completed. In 4 1992 all the prisons defaulted. They were all built with no 5 contract to house prisoners in place. They did not receive 6 prisoners from the State of Texas. They all defaulted, the 7 bond holders received fifty cents on the dollar for their 8 investment. After that, the State of Texas condemned the 9 facilities and filled them 'with their own state level 10 prisoners 11 In 1992, a prison in Appleton, Minnesota also 12 defaulted. It too was built on Speculation. It too did not 13- have a contract from the state, and it too never received any 14 prisoners. They did default in 1992, they were able to- 15 procure prisoners this year. They were sent 500 prisoners 16 from Puerto Rico. 17 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Before you go on would you give 18 me the words for the acronym COP. 19 MS. NEILEY: Oh, I'm sorry. Yes, the title -of the 20 report from John'-Nuvene is entitled Prison COP's. COP stands 21 for Certificate of Participation. It's a common term when 22 you're talking about a lease -backed financing as this would be' 23 a lease. We would be getting a lease from the state to rent 24 the beds. 25' The off -sited priSon in Brush actually defaulted on 163 1 l its first foray into the financial markets. The investor 2 there, Colonial Bond Fund, _received 20 -cents on the dollar'. 3 That facility was refinanced, by a venture capital group and 4 does now hold juvenile offenders. I, understand they are from 5 not just Colorado but from other states as well. 6 Among other things, the report draws the following 7 conclusions.. Letme see if I've got another slide for you. 8 For-profit jail COP's -have-the worst default record of any 9 known group of tax exempt securities and. jail COP's maybe the 10 most fundamentally flawed credits ever offered to tax -exempt - 11 investors in mutual funds. I'd like to make a point here that 12 they have typically been financed using tax-exempt securities; 13 however, it doesn't really matter ifthey're financed with_ 14, taxable or tax-exempt, it's ,the same credit behind the issue. 15 It's the same prison or pre -parole -facility.. It's the same 16 contract or lack thereof with the state that secures these 17, bonds. 18 What are the, factors _ that led to Nuvene's 19 . conclusions? Rental prisons :are highly counter -cyclical. 20, According to Nuvene, jails are like, convention centers; both: 21 types of projects are locally leased financed. When local 22 economies slump, -civic leaders are more likely to finance a 23 risky„ venture- in an effort to create new jobs and new 24 businesses. 25- Number. two: ma recession, private prisons are by 164 1 1 I I 1 1 1 i I L 1 i 1 1 I I I 1 passed. weak finances force states to develop lower cost 2 alternatives such as work'release, electronic monitoring and 3 boot camps. Some states are abandoning rent -a -cells as their 4 contracts expire and moving prisoners into their own 5 facilities as they come on line. 6 Number three: feasibility studies, and I will speak 7 more to this later'. Nobody of feasibility work exists for 8 private tax exempt correctional projects. 9 Number four: stabbings and riots. It's kind of one 10 of those, gee they're all afraid of this, I don't really like 11 the way they titled this particular category; but the point is 12 legal uncertainties have `arisen over large-scale interstate 13 transport of convicts. Injuries and lawsuits could be 14 financially ruinous to owners of a small city or county jail 15 if they happen to be underinsured. The other question Nuvene 16 raises, is does the county insurance cover the prison. Many 17 counties are surprised to find that their insurance coverage 18 cannot be extended to cover prisons. 19 Increasingly important is the civil rights liability 20 issue over prisoner' illness: Two major hidden costs which 21 contracts pass through 'to the issuers are the costs of 22 liability awards and medical expense if an inmate becomes ill 23 or if' one inmate injures another. A fairly' new type of 24 financial risk is civil rights liability suits. In these 25 suits, inmates typically allege injury because of inadequate 165 1 security. Many inmates tend to belitigious;.most prisons 2 3 will have a law library.. They did, change the way they 5 6 7 8 9 transfer prisoners to rental jails, wardens prefer to enlarge 10 their own. Private jailsraisecomplaints from inmates and_ 11 their supporters. 12- Number seven: administering necessary, force. 13 Extreme tension and conflicts result -from the cultural gap 14. created when -poorly trained -guards find themselves supervising 15 prison -wise and violent convicts. . Critics . claim that 16 inexperienced guards cannot properly handle the inmates. 17 - Number eight: staffingfromlocalresidents. I'd 18 really like to focus on this 19 that they can staff their prisons with local residents, 20 thereby creating new jobs. But jails require only one staff, 21 member for every five beds.Because inmates cook and- clean, - 22 prisons are not labor-intensive; in actuality, few local jobs 23 are, created. Also, commercial, managers often bring in outside 24 staff. have heavily used law libraries. -This pre -parole facility referred to that today and they called In the meeting to the planning board, library. Private jails are a -short-term needs. I need to put another slide 25. I wouldliketo it -a reference library. they did call it a law solution to long-term up here. Rather than • Local officialsare often told mention at this point that I have 166 i I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 contacted a couple of people that The Villa has referred to 2 and used as support for this type of project. Charles 3 Thomas, in particular, is the' head of the private prisons 4 project at the University of Florida in Gainesville. He is 5 the author of the majority of the studies that The Villa has 6 used to convince us all that'property values don't decline, 7 that violence does not increase, that growth continues in 8 cities; almost all the information they have used comes from 9 one or more of his sources. He is paid by the private prison 10 industry. He does publish a private prison industry 11 newsletter on a quarterly basis. He is basically the only 12 source of information in this country right now on private 13 prisons and he is used and quoted heavily. Nuvene takes great 14 exception to very much of his study. They do agree with him 15 on a lot of things, but he does not study the prisons and the, 16 default records of the prisons and the impacts on the bond 17 communities and the impacts on the counties when those prisons 18 default. He said to me when I called him, he said, "Oh, The 19 Villa of Greeley? Yeah, Michael Brand called me when he first 20 got the contract or the RFP from the state. He said they're 21 contracting with MTC from Ogden to provide the training 22 programs at the facility." I said, "Oh, who said?" He said, 23 "Well they're a corporation that specializes in that type of 24 thing" and then: he went on to'say that people in these pre -- 25 parole facilities tend to teach vocational type classes, 167 1 1 teaching, them welding, teaching -them some sort of a field that 2 they can do when they get -out of prison. I stopped him. I 3 said, "No, they're doing. -more like the psychological". He 4 said, "Oh, yeah, the family violence, the anger management, 5 yeah; those aren't nearly as effective." And that is what he 6 told me. But the whole point I bring that up is I would like 7 you to ask The Villa, since it's not really proper forme and 8 I can't ask you to do it, are -they bringing in outside 9 management or are they, going, to be using local educators? I; 10 for my own rectification, I don't know. 11 Number nine: white collar prisoners are, promised 12 .for local facilities. In many?cases, habitual criminals, 13 murderers and rapists, I know you don't like this, are sent to 14 local facilities even though the jails -are not high security. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 not designed to house violent felons.- If localities focused 24 on building expensive maximum security prisons instead of. 25 inexpensive low to -,mid -security prisons,. which this -is, they: Public outcries have caused prisoners to be transferred to their former prisons and the new jails stand empty.,.. Number ten: remote jail locations are objected to by civil rights and prisonerrights groups because thislimits visits by friends, family and others. - Some states now have legislation, prohibiting transfers of prisoners, mot only out of state, but between.jurisdictions/within states_ And the last point: low to mid -security prisons are 168 1 I 1 I I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 e i could easily find prisoners. Hard-core convicts are the 2 fastest growing group -and the ones -wardens most want to 3 transfer out, not the ones coming closest to the end of their 4 sentence. 5 There are some other reactions from the business 6 community that I've got here. I actually have many of them, 7 but for lack of time and all that we'll Just give you.a few 8 others. 9 The people from The Villa have talked to you about 10 four pre -parole facilities in Texas as being examples of 11 things we'd like to keep here or have here: I did talk to Mr. 12 Thomas about those. They said, I don't know who said this for 13 The Villa, I can't remember, that people were at firstin 14 those communities unwilling to have prisons there. They were 15 worried about the security andwhatnot. They actually 16 practically had lotteries to see which counties could build 17 prisons in Texas. Many counties in Texas wanted prisons, and 18 these pre -parole facilities were actually wanted by those 19 communities and had tremendous -community support from the very 20 beginning. Mr. Thomas, when I told him of the tremendous- 21 amount of opposition, he said most developers would know 22 enough to pull out. 23 Those four facilities I mentioned in Texas, two of 24 them are run by the CCA, you`ll -notice at the bottom, 25 Correction Corporation of America, they run 21 facilities with: 169 a total of 7,300 beds. The $68 -million dollar company did not 2 even become profitable until its seventh year of operations. 3 Mr. Thomas told me this was the industry leader for private 4 prison corrections. And you see they aren't exactly a ringing 5 endorsement of the type of business that these prisons will or 6 will not bring. Wackenhutoperates the other two facilities, 7 the other two private pre -parole facilities in Texas, and 8 operate of 11 facilities shows that corrections contributes 9 little or nothing to their profits. 10 I. have one final slide. .Nuvene'sfinal conclusions 11 and recommendations to investors are follows. Investors, 12 and I take that to mean ourselves. aswell not because -we have 13 _much more invested really in this project than bond investors 14 would ever have, investors are strongly urged to avoid states 15 where for-profit prisons have been or are being built. And 16 investors should insist -on -a; firm contract before committing 17 themselves. Charles Thomas, the head of theprivate. prisons 18 project in Florida, repeated this. too. He said speculative 19 prisons have had a very poor track. record. There are.private 20 prisons out there, that are doing. well, but they had contracts 21 in place beforethey were ever issued. 22 A few other things you might like to know. There. 23 have been 25. defaults on privately operated prisons since 24 . 1990, since 1980. Nine since 1990. This constitutes more 25 than a third.of,all lease defaults nationwide regardless of 170 • 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 purpose; convention center, -sports -complex, jails, whatever. 2 All of the nine most recent -lease -defaults involved for-profit 3 prisons for which securities were issued before the owners had 4 contracts to rent cells to state and local governments: 5 Again, -please remember that this -facility has no contract and 6' we heard from -the Department of Corrections person here 7- stating that they don't even agree on the -minimum- number of 8 days -for prisoners to be incarcerated in this facility. Mr. 9 Brand has continually said=we"will negotiate this: into a 10 contract, we will negotiate that -into a contract, we will have 11 to come up with a mutual aid'agreement. I submit there is a 12 lot that stands between -them actually getting the contract and- 13 today. 14 Unlike prisons that -are owned by -a state 'or local 15 government, -for-profit jails:are not essential to the owners 16 and carry greater than usual political risks because they do 17 not have a public mandate. Z think it's probably fair -to say 18 that we don't have a public -mandate for this' particular 19 facility in this particular location. 20 Now I would like, to: address feasibility studies,- 21 which typically are done for a -specific area=at-a specific 22 time and they determine whether or not -a facility in an area 23 would be profitable. The Villa has not done a -feasibility 24 study. The one for Brush before it defaulted cost in excess: 25 -of $50,000. I"can see'why they'wouldn't want to pay for this 171 1 1 up front. Feasibility _studies are extraordinarily expensive 2 and the nationally recognized, reputable accounting firms that 3 do them want to be, paid very highly because their reputations 4 are on the line.for these things.- I did talk to one -of the 5 CPA'S that worked on the Brush facilityprison and that's how 6. I know how much they spent,on particular feasibility 7 study. What they have done is provide -you with two reports by 8. Ann Garrison called;"Private Pre -Parole Facility- and the 9 Greeley Economy" and.an that, same report. I've 10 gone through both_of those pretty -extensively. I'd like to 11 point out, that one. was -done in September of 1992, over a year 12 . ago.- The other wasdone in, March of this -year, -it's getting 13 on to be almost a year itself. Those are not timely reports. 14 They were not done :for -this. location. They were not done for 15 any specific location. They were done for: Weld County in 16 general. We all know that Greeley is different from Del 17 Camino, is different -,from Windsor, is different, from,Dacono. 18 There are all kinds of different places. These really aren't 19 relevant to this particular location. 20 I called Ms. Garrison at Mr.,Brand's suggestion at 21 the last meeting_ and talked toTierabout her research. Ms. 22, Garrison was extremely helpful to me, and was one of the more 23 helpful people I did speak to I asked her how she could 24 state that property values would. not decline based on a 1985- 25 California -study -that sited a housingdevelopment in Folsom, 172 1 i. 1 1 1 1 1 1. i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 California which was already a prison town. She indicated to 2 me that there's very little in•£ormation available to her and 3 she used what she had. I mentioned to her the following were 4 missing from that report and I couldn't consider it valid, the 5 report didn't mention home size, pre -sale information, permit 6 dates for the homes, permit dates for the prison, marketing 7 incentives, who bought the homes. It just really has a lot of 8 information missing. I also talked to Mr. Thomas about this 9 and he said as well, there is very little information 10 available on a nationwide basis for determining what effects' 11 prisons have, either public or private, on property values. 12 Yet, The Villa has repeatedly endorsed reports by Mr. Thomas 13 himself as proof that property values don't go down. Mr.' 14 Thomas, who wrote the reports, says there is not very much 15 evidence. He is making large, what's the word I'm looking, 16 for, assumptions I guess, based on a limited amount of 17 information. Nobody has really funded a study. Who wants to 18 pay for that kind of information? 'They're afraid what they'll 19 find. 20 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: What about the information 21 we heard today of the'Larimer County Detention Facility and 22 the business park that has since developed around that? I 23 mean, basically, that study or what that woman presented today 24 showed that property values did increase. In fact they went 25 ahead and built a whole development 'all the way around that 173 detention facility? 2 MS. NEILEY; ;I don't know. All I can say is that 3 the people that were buying those homes had the opportunity to 4 not buy them because the -prison was already there. So, you're 5 starting at ground zero. ::I doubt if there was a piece of land 6 without a home on it and you put a house on it, I doubt very 7 much that property,would,dec:ine in value once that home were 8 put on it regardless, of the price it sold for. In other 9 words, the bare land had -less of a value than it did once it 10- had the home on it. Property values have to increase once you. 11. put a $150,000 home on a piece of land. Do -you see what I'm 12 saying? 13 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: Well, then what about 14 subdivisions that were already there -before the detention 15, facility wasbuilt, that are within a mile of that, that were 16. already there? 17 MS. NEILEY: I don't know. 18 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: And then they continue to 19 build homes that are of higher value. 20 MS. NEILEY: They might, perhaps they use that area 2.1 as a basis for a study, I -don't know. There has been nothing 22 written about it and nothing shown other than what this 23 property manager today gave you, so I guess I would tend to 24 take that with as. much, I guess,I would examine it as closely 25 as I would examine the information that I'm presenting. I; 174 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 don't know that it has any more credence than to say that 2 these reports, on a nationwide basis, there's very little 3 information. 4 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: So are you saying that the 5 presence of a detention facility or a pre -parole facility 6 would be a decline in property valuations? 7 MS. NEILEY: I'm` saying there's not enough 8 information to say that it would not hurt property values. 9 I'm saying that when, in absence of' proof that it will not 10 hurt, how can we ask people to risk their homes and their 11 values on something that we can't prove that it's going to 12 help or not hurt? 13 Ms. Garrison also said that in no way should her, or 14 could her reports be used as an economic feasibility study, 15 although they could be used as a sub -set of one. I already 16 mentioned how expensive feasibility studies are. I should add 17 that that is a requirement for a bond issue. A feasibility 18 study will have to be done, as well a phase one environmental 19 study to determine whether or -not there are any toxic waste 20 type issues and that includes oil and gas, anything that would 21 have to be cleaned up before an investor would look at a 22 property. 23 community I did reconfirm' that with people in the bond- and that is a minimum requirement for anything 24 that's got real estate on it for a -bond holder. -Those are 25 expensive as well, but again those 'could be done at a later 175 1 date. 2 The Villa continues totell you that our opposition 3 is based on fear and they are right. What I fear isthat if 4 this issue fails for any reason, the county -will openly pay a 5 price in the credit markets with any other issues that bear 6 the county's name regardless of what they have to do with. It 7 just, it tends to, follow, I mean it's a guilt by association, 8 but when there is an issuedefaultingthat bears our name that 9 has anything to do with us, our counties, our cities, people 10 are aware of it and they will think, hmm, and they might not 11 be, they might eventually say okay that has nothing to do with 12 Weld County nine and a halves is 62 or whatever and obviously 13 62 isn't a valid maturity date, but it will warrant further 14 inspection, I guess, of the credits andpeople won't be as 15 likely to buy them on the spur of the moment without doing a 16 , lot more research. It has been proven that issues defaulting 17 in the credit markets do have a negative result, a negative 18 effect on othercredits for that same county or city. 19 According to the bond_buyer, which I cited earlier, 20 municipal analysts have increasingly made attempts to hold 21 issuers responsible for defaults by such conduit finance 22 projects. Can we be assured that,the taxpayers, the,people 23 around the county, the_ county officials, will be absolutely. 24 fault -free if something happens to this facility? How can we. 25 beassuredof that? 176 1 1. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Increasingly, municipal analysts are going back. I 2 - can cite an example in Texas with regard to the six facilities 3 that defaulted. They -actually launched a grand jury 4 investigation of the county commissioners that had approved 5 those facilities, so it was not something where they said, 6 well the county has no 'liability. They actually did try to 7 get the county. 8 Neither Moody's nor Standard and Poors, and I trust 9 you're all familiar with, those are the two largest credit 10 rating agencies in the United States. Neither Moody's nor 11 Standard and Poors''will rate a for-profit prison issue. If 12 they do rate a prison issue, they -are either rating the G.O.' 13 Debt as it is a 'state facility and a state budget will cover 14 the annual payments for that, or they are rating' the insurance- 15 company if an insurance company is involved with rating, with 16 insuring the issue. I' don't know -if The Villa has approached 17 an insurance company for this or not, but Moody's and Standard- 18 and Poors will not rate an issue of this type. 19 I respectfully submit that a project that 20 speculative in 'nature in an -industry with such an incredibly 21 poor track record does not warrant your approval. I'm open 22 for questions. 23 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Are there any other questions for 24 Ms. Neiley? 25 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER:• Yes. What kind of 177 1 liability do you think the county would be 2 MS. NEILEY: I don't know. I just, that is a 3 question that Nuvene raised saying that liability, and I 4 assume the county has liability, in case somebody breaks out 5 of the prison, comes up to my house, steals my car, who do I 6 sue. I don't know. That's the question. 7 [MULTIPLE COMMENTS) 8 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER:--Maybe we could have our 9 County Attorney address that. Is the county liableinthat 10 situation or in any, type of situation? 11 MR. MORRISON: No. This facility is, if approved by 12 .contract with the state,: in, addition to any immunities the 13 state -might have and the county possesses, it is. not. a -county 14 function. So, I don't see that there -.is a liability attaching 15 to the county in any fashion as a result of activities that 16 take place at, that site. I do have a question. Youcited a 17 Nuvene's study,,that study is not contained in any of these 18 documents? 19 MS. NEILEY: No. 20 MR. MORRISON: Do you. have -a copy of- that. study 21 available? 22 MS. NEILEY: Yeah. Mine's marked, up. 23 _ MR. MORRISON: The-ones:I referred to are 6H through 24 6L. 25 MS. NEILEY: .,There.is information is there on public 1 78 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 facilities as well. 1 2 COMMISSIONER HALL: Ms. Neile Y. are you familiar 3 with the bond-issuethat they're planning on using? 4 MS. NEILEY: Oh, thank you because that does bring 1 5 up something I forgot to mention. When asked if the state 6 condemned this facility or if the purpose of the facility 1 7 would change, what would happen' to the bond holders during ' 8 construction or reconstruction of that facility? Mr. Coppom 9 said that's all taken care of, there's a six-month pool-. 1 10 Every bond issue has that, it's -called the debt service 11 reserve and most bond issues of a speculative nature actually 12 have a one-year debt service'- reserve -and that's not meant to 13 cover bond interest in the event of construction as he pointed 14 out. It's meant to cover bond -interest in the event that the- ' 15 facility is slow getting off -the' ground and the investors 16 aren't left holding the bag once the capitalized interest has - I17 run out. 18 COMMISSIONER HALL: But do you know, my question is, 19 do you know what the bond issue is that they are talking 20 about? 21 MS. NEILEY: Mope. ' 22 COMMISSIONER HALL: Then are you making a lot of 23 assumptions based on no facts? 24 MS. NEILEY: Yep. No, I'm making a lot of ' 25 assumptions based on"there`s only two kinds of ways you can 179 1 1 finance these facilities. 2 COMMISSIONER HALL: So you're making a lot of 3 assumptions saying that the county's going to be liable for 4 these bonds.. 5 MS.-NEILEY: No, I didn't say the county was going 6 to be liable, 7 COMMISSIONER HALL: That's what I heard you say. 8 MS. NEILEY: I asked the question. 9 COMMISSIONER: You implied. 10 MS. NEILEY:- Implication. I actually, asked 11 something that's in Nuvene's report... That Is something that 12 Nuvene said. I -would hope we're not liable, I mean I don't 13 want to imply that at all. 14 CHAIRMAN.HARBERT: Any more questions? We will have 15 Conrad Hopp speak and then, following that we will break for 16 dinner. We knew this was going to.be a. long day. We .knew we 17 could go to 10:00 tonight if that's necessary, that's what 18 we'll do. Conrad? 19 MR... HOPP: , Madam. Chairman, members of the 20 commission, my name is Conrad Hopp. I reside at 11413 Weld 21 County Road 13. My residence is approximately two miles due 22 east of the proposed, site. My property actually begins a mile 23 and a half from the proposed site. 24 Both my wife, .Martha, and -I. are. third generation 25. residents of the Area. The. property.. has been inherfamily 180 I i 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 name since 1906, so -I'm not a'newcomer to the area. I hope 2 when my thing is finished -you don't think I'm anti -growth 3 because I'm really not. 4 Zoning may be the primary issue that needs to be 5 addressed today, but I'm glad that we're looking at the 6 infrastructure of the area that has been addressed several 7 times today, and there are basically three services or 8 infrastructure that I would like to talk to you about today. 9 The'infrastructure that exists in -the area must be sufficient 10 to address the needs.' Different growth requires different 11 needs. Some may support your infrastructure in some cases and 12 some may tax it. And this is what I want to talk about. And 13 the facts I want to share with you today are not pretending: 14 that this could happen or that could happen. What I want to 15 share with you today is things that exist today, whether The 16 Villa is there or not, they exist today. 'I'm not putting any 17 responsibility for anything on The Villa itself. The Del 18 Camino area has no infrastructure whatsoever that it can call 19 its own. This is just fact for you. Everything, the 20 infrastructure that is in the area is controlled by boards 21 that live in totally different areas. There is no - 22 infrastructure that we can say this is our police department 23 or this is our fire department or this is our water- 24 department. Everything'is controlled outside. Whether that 25 ' affects your decision or not,- this"is just information for you 181 1 1 ' 2 when my thing is finished you don`t think I'm anti -growth 3 because I'm really not. 4` Zoning may be the primary issue that needs to be ' 5 addressed today, but I'm glad that we're looking at the 6 infrastructure of the area that has been addressed several 7 times today, and there are basically three services or ' 8 infrastructure that I would like to -talk to you about today. 9 The infrastructure that exists in -the area must be sufficient 10 to address the needs. Different growth requires different 11 needs. Some may support your infrastructure in some cases and ' 12 some may tax it. And this is what I want to talk about. And 13 the facts I want to share with you today are- not pretending ' 14 that this could happen or that could happen. What I want to ' 15 share with you today is things that'exist today, whether The 16 Villa is there or not, they exist today. I'm not putting any ' 17 responsibility for anything on 'The Villa itself. The Del 18 Camino area has no infrastructure whatsoever that it can call 19 its own. This is just fact for you. Everything, the I 20 infrastructure that is' in the area is controlled by boards - 21 that live in totally different areas. There is no 22 infrastructure that we can say this is our police department 23 or this is our fire department or this is our water 24 department. Everything is controlled outside. Whether that - 25' affects your decision or not,"this is just information for you 1 name since 1906, so I'm -not'a newcomer to the area. I hope 181 1 1 to think, about in the area. -One of the reasons there is no 2 infrastructure.is because of the make-up of the area which is 3 agricultural, rural and commercial. And nothing is incorporated, so they have no, way, of raising funds for 5 infrastructure,in this area. 6 One item I want to discuss with you today is law 7 enforcement. With no local. law enforcement, the area totally 8 depends on Weld County_ Sheriff,. as has been stated before. 9 And I want to say that,I have the, highest regard for, the Weld 10 County _Sheriff's office. They do -a tremendous job ,for the - 11 county. I sometimes think they're superhuman because of the 12 resources they have, basically budgeting for a county this 13. size and the money they have to cover it. ,The Sheriff says he 14 can protectthearea. One officer serving 1,300 square miles, 15 .and that's what the officer does, inthat area, if.that comes 16 under the definition of, protectiont it doesn't come under 17 - mine Maybe this isonething-of the Sheriff's I can't agree_ 18 on. This isn't protection_ -in an area. Approximately five - 19 years ago, the citizens _of this -area and the then Board of 20 Directors of Mountain View and the thenchief, approached the 21 County Commissioners requesting. a Sheriff substation in the 22 area because we, recognized the -need , at ..that time for law. 23. - enforcement in the area on;a,permanent_basis. I believe only 24 one Commissioner was on -that board at_ that time. Our first- 25- _meeting wasn't really welcome open arms meeting. We discussed: 182 1 1 I 1 1 1. 1 1 e 1. 1 1 1 1 1 this with the Commissioners..-" As I"recallwe only met two 2 timeswith the Commissioners but there -was several meetings 3 with the Sheriff at that: time. We wanted to put a substation 4 in Station 2 which is two miles east of Del Camino because we 5 were building a new firehouse at that time and we saw' the need 6 for law enforcement -in the area. -We did arrive at a`contract 7- with the Sheriff. The contract is a year-to-year basis, can 8 be canceled by either: party in 30 days and it's kind of one 9 sided because we'only get $75 a -month for the services out 10 - there that we are -furnishing. I just want to point this out. 11 I think the area needs a more substantial type of service from - 12 the county so that we have the needed protection. - Or it has 13 to -come from Del Camino, -they need"to incorporate. I don't 14 know how we're going to service it. That need exists today,.' 15 whether The Villa is there or it isn't there. The Sheriff has 16been a lot more visible because the car is at the substation 17 - sometimes in the evenings when he does some -paperwork. It 18 isn't there on a regular basis. The time it takes for the 19 Sheriff to respond hasn't changed a -whole lot because- of the, 20-- area he covers. I thinkwe- -could double -the -protection in 21 that immediateareasimply 'by putting a sign outside the- 22 Sheriff's office that says 'Weld County Sheriff Substation, - 23 something visible to -'the community_ -and the passer-by. But I 24 really don't feel that one -officer for -1,300 -square -miles is= 25 good protection"for an:area: And -that -exists"today-and:I have 183 1. heard nothing of that changing:, What the area actually needs,: 2 by the feeling of the community, is two officers full time in: 3 that area. And when I refer to the Del Camino area, it goes - 4 clean up to 66 -because of. the businesses and that.wouldn't be 5 covering:it really well. But two officers would probably take. 6 ten men because of the Fair Labor Standard Act at a cost of 7 almost $400,000 so I understand why the county can't do it and 8 I understand why.Del Camino -can't-do.it.•, But that's what's 9 needed today in the area, whether The Villa is built or not. 10 Another item I would- like to,- address is the 11 emergency response. I sent a letter, or hand delivered a 12. letter on November 12th to the -Commissioners. In that letter 13 I was just informing you of how, things exist today out there. 14 - Every item in that letter was factual except how I wanted you 15 to vote and that was a hope, I guess. But everything else was 16 documented in that letter. It did not,;in no way, be, meant to , 17 .say Mountain View Fire Protection District would not serve 18 that area. If there was any underlying message in that letter - 19 that: I hoped you would read -.into it is• that Mountain View's _ 20 :responsibility does not -startor stop at the walls of any 21 building that's built out there..,By definition -of protection 22- district, we ..are responsible for::life and property in the 23 - total ;districtand whatever happens: in the total district. 24 - And I'm not:saying-that,The.:Viila:isgoing to cause a lot more , 25 . problems in the -district or. they're.not._We're overtaxed.,:, 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 t 1 1 184 1 I 1 1 1 The other thing I wanted you to 'read in"that is who responds 2 to these things? The majority.are volunteers that live in the 3 area. Some of them were'here today, they've left. Will they 4 respond? You bet. They're professionals. We've got a great 5 fire department, but these are the taxpayers who are opposing 6 it. And are we going to put the more burden on the people who 7 opposed it, because that's who answer the calls up there, by 8 and large, are the people of the community and that was'simply 9 addressed in my letter. And if there'was'a misunderstanding 10 that I was speaking for Mountain View, I'm one board member,- 11 I have one vote. And I never intended that to mean that way. 12 I wanted you to have the fact of what exists in the area 13 today. 14 The next item is also in the first responder, the- 15 ambulances that serve the area. 'Weld County has an ambulance 16 district. The ground rig'is stationed in Ft. Lupton, which is 17 of no virtual use to us whatsoever because of the distance it 18 has to come. The chopper is 'very useful but has to be used 19 with discretion because it serves a large county and you can't 20 just call it. There are. certain calls that you can make for 21 that chopper. The ambulance is dispatched out of Boulder 22 County and I think this is something important for you to 23 think- about. ` And the fire district is dispatched out of 24 Boulder County. The reason' T think it's important to you I' 25 will get to`later when we`get into communications in the area. 185 I 1 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Conrad, doesn't the Tri-Area 2 Ambulance respond? 3 MR. HOPP: Tri-Area Ambulance is south of us. It is 4 an. ambulance district and -it has nothing to do with the Del 5 Camino area. It's a district that has its boundaries. We do 6 contract part of our area to Tri-Area Ambulance. My feeling 7 on Tri-Area, Ambulance,, they organized that district simply so 8 -they'd have an ambulance. They have a county ambulance, but 9 it's also too far away. If you want to know the truth,. 10 they're being double taxed. .They're taxed for an ambulance in 11 their district and they're being taxed for an ambulance by 12 Weld County.. 13 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: No, they're not being taxed by 14 Weld County. 15 MR. HOPP: They aren't any more? 16 CHAIRMAN HARBERT:, No. 17 - MR. HOPP: I'm glad_ you corrected me. 18 CHAIRMAN.HARSERT: .They haven't been for a long, 19 , long time. 20 MR. HOPP:,. Oh, okay. Well, I'm not -in Tri-Area- 21. Ambulance's area. 22 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Ambulance is self-sustaining. 23 . MR. HOPP: but Tri-Area does;not serve that area at_ 24 this time. We backed up an ambulance by using.Air Life or-, 25 Flight for Lifeout of St. Anthony's.;, That's another back-up, 186 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I but that is the ambulance services. 2- The communications, as I said, both the fire 3 district and the ambulances are dispatched out of Boulder 4 County. This is information for you. The fire district pays 5 $33,000 a year to Boulder County to be dispatched. They 6 dispatch us for the calls we have in weld County, as I 7 understand it. You know county politics better than I do, but 8 if that's what they're charging us for, that's $90 a call. So 9 it's very expensive for the taxpayers of Mountain View for 10 dispatching alone. 11 The real reason that's important is if there -was an 12 incident today that the -Sheriff needed to be- there and 13 Mountain View needed' to be there, they have no direct 14 communications with each "other simply `'because- one is' 15 dispatched out of Weld and one -is dispatched out of Boulder. 16 There's two ways to communicate with each other: We, AS - 17 Mountain View, can radio Boulder who then radios Weld, who 18 - then radios the Sheriff and GIVESourmessage. That's one 19 way. Or we can -ask --Weld County -to put the Sheriff's 20 Department on'firn channel' and that's another channel, but it 21 would have to go -through the process of changing the whole- 22 thing. And I believe AT that time maybe the Weld County -- 23 Sheriff loses some of his communications'with-Weld County, I'm• 24 not sure. But the ambulance -and the`fire district operate on 25 that same type of thing in that area-. So, growth that needs 187 I 1 or taxes the Sheriff and/or the fire district, and I'm not 2 talking about a fire inside the facility. That doesn't really 3 concern me so much at this time, it's the total, we answer 4 every emergency call in the area. And you have a copy of what 5 we've answered this last year. 6 Those are the concerns that I have that it isn't 7 compatible at this time with .._ the infrastructure of law 8 enforcement, the fire district and the ambulance simply 9 because we can't communicate. It takes dollars to, correct 10 those things. Where do the dollars comefrom tocorrectthose 11 things? Who's going to furnish those dollars? Is it fair for - 12 weld County taxpayers or is it fair for the community that is- 13- taxing and working to give, these services? Now, maybe The 14 Villa, as one fella said, we're a big family and we've got to 15 help solve each other's problems. Maybe they would assume the - 16 responsibility of putting in those missing links to the 17 infrastructure, I don't,know.I mean this is something that 18 has to be addressed before we can put a facility like this in 19 an area. And I'm not even speculating on what type.of calls 20 thatwill come.. We're overtaxed today as .far ,as the. 21 community, to handle,a lot of things we, need. If there's any 22 questions, that's all I have. 23. CHAIRMAN HARSERT._. Any questions for Mr. Hopp? 24 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: Would The Villa be in - 25 Mountain View's district? 188 1 r 1 I I 1 2 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: And how does the, doesn't 3 the district collect 'the taxes from the property owners by a 4 mill levy? 5 6 County. MR. HOPP: Yes. MR. HOPP: From property owners in Boulder and Weld 7 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: 'So you would collect taxes 8 from The Villa because they would have that mill levy on their 9 property that would go to your district? 10 MR. HOPP: Not necessarily, because of Amendment 1, 11 we can't raise, if you're familiar with that, we can't raise 12 our budget above a certain amount. 13 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: You Can't raise your mill 14 levy. 15 MR. HOPP: We can't raise our mill levy and we can't 16 raise our budget. 17 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: But you're still assessing 18 that property a mill -levy to be in 'your district. 19 MR. HOPP:'It-will'lower some. I don't know what'll 20 happen. I do not think the taxes 21 COMMISSIONER "KIRKMEYER: So you do assess that - 22 property a mill levy to be in your district. 23 MR. HOPP: That's right. `We do assess it a mill 24 levy. 25 COMMISSIONER WEBSTER: So -'you will assess The Villa 189 1 1 if its 2 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER But they're already 3 assessing the. property a mill levy? 4 MR. HOPP: There isn't any , virtually anything on it 5 that you'd geti money from. One of- theproblems school 6 district have, fire districts have, any taxing, every building that is built is normally occupied and up for 18 months before 8 you get taxes off it. Number, -one, it has to go on a tax role 9 by a certain date and then you collect taxes for year later. 10 So you're always behind when you're in a development area of 11 trying to catch up because you're giving services whether 12 you're the Sheriff's Department, or a fire district or a school 13 district, anybody. You're, always behind getting taxes and it 14 stretches you to your limit and then when you have situations 15 like Amendment. .1 that you get growth plus CPI on a 16 combination, I don't know how long we can continue to operate 17 and give theservices we give with Amendment 1. It's a 18 question and I'm sure that you, as a county,, have to look at 19 the same.. It's no. different. You're just,a lot larger. 20 COMMISSIONER .HALL:_ If I'm -understanding You... 21 correctly, you said that you weren't necessarily singling out 22 this facility.. 23 MR. HOPP: No... That's why ' y you may think Z m anti - 24 growth. 25 COMMISSIONER HALL: You're looking at it as a growth 190 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 factor because of the infrastructure in there. 2 MR. HOPP: That's right. 3 COMMISSIONER. HALL: I understand you're saying that 4 if there was a Hauser Chemical Company or a Specialty Products 5 Company. 6 MR. HOPP: I think we need to be looked at the same 7 way. I think we need to look at every one. Some of them 8 require a lot more than others. I don't know what the, since 9 I know nothing about pre -parole release facilities, I couldn't 10 speculate. I'm not even going to attempt to. I'know there's 11 going to be a lot more traffic in the area. 12 COMMISSIONER HALL: If there are no businesses 13 paying taxes, how then do you get more services? 14 MR. HOPP: Businesses pay taxes, but let me give you 15 an example of the cooperation we get in the community. I 16 worked for 14 years to get a fire house in that area. I- 17 worked hard. We lowered the ISO' rating, we did a lot of 18 things. We approached the land, the owners in the Del Camino 19 area, the businesses who today say'that, you know they're in - 20 favor of The Villa. And we said if we lower your ISO rating, 21 will you 'give half of the money you save on insurance to us to 22 build a fire house. And the comment came back from the - 23 business, I'm a self -insured, you're not going tosaveme any. 24 They could care less whether they had a fire department in the 25 area. But we have a responsibility. This happened many years 191 1 ago. We worked through those things, but you don'.t always get 2 the cooperation you need. As far as the communications, I 3 have served on E911 advisory board ,for the State of Colorado. 4 It's a good system when it works right. Just,two days ago or 5 three days ago, a call went to Weld County on 911 because all 6 calls in Weld County go to Greeley, then have to go to Boulder 7 to be dispatched to us. .The fella told me this morning it was 8 25 minutes and our firehouse is a .half mile from his house. 9 .There was a glitch somewhere_ I'm sure we can work those 10 problems out, but until we address all the problems and get 11 things working properly,, we. really need to know how much we 12 want to tax the infrastructure of areas like that. If there's 13 any other questions? 14, CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Are there any other questions for 15 Mr. Hopp? Thank you Conrad._. We will break and return at 16 7:30. 17 (A .break was taken.) 18 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Would you please take your, seats. 19 We will reconvene, and let the recordshow all five 20 Commissionersare present. The. next person on our list is. 21. Diane Aites. And then Jan, England will be next.. 22 MS. AITES:_ My name. is Diane Aites.. I live.at 4919- 23 Weld County Road 24-3/4. I.am located approximately one mile, 24 from the proposed prison. facility. I've lived at my residence 2 . for 20.years .. If the Commissioners; vote yes on this issue, I 192 1 1 1 1 i 1 I will see the secured fence and -"the high-powered lights burning 2 all night "long and you will not. I will constantly worry 3 about my safety and the safety of my -family. You will not. 4 I will feel the depreciating -value-of my property. You will 5 not. I will awaken to sounds`in the night, not knowing what 6 or whom has made them. I. ask the members of the commission to 7 walk in my shoes today and if you do, I'm sure your vote will 8 be, "We Will Not. Thank you very much. 9 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Are there any questions for Ms. 10 Aites? Jan England; And then Frank Canapa. lI MS. ENGLAND: I'm Jan England. I live at 4879 Weld 12 County Road 24-3/4, which is nine -tenths of a mile from the 13 proposed site. I'm Diane's next door neighbor to the west. 14 I've lived there for almost 14 years and I'm -a property owner: 15 And I strongly feel that"this prison would strongly 16 affect my quality of life. Y want to talk about property. 17 values and perceptive property values. I agree with all the 18 other points that other people have made, but I'll hold it to 19 that subject. 20 When I moved fromthe city to this area, I`knew it 21 would change. Fourteen years ago' there was one gas station, 22 23 24 25 in Longmont "in April, I no eating establishments.' I guess there was the one. It was a farming community. `I "knew it wouldchange,'grow, hopefully in positive ways. After the"first newspaper article appeared was talking "to my --folks and I 193 mentioned the possibility of this facility to them. And my 2 dad said, "Oops," he said, "look out for your neighborhood and 3 your property values to go to pot.". I -asked .him what that 4 meant because we'd been told at the Budget Host Motel meeting 5 April 26th the ,very opposite of those things; that our 6 property values would probably maintain a level, even improve, 7 there wouldn't be any safety problems for our neighborhood. 8 So I asked him to explain. And he said when ,he was a young 9 child his dad, mygrandfather, told him that there was very 10 little hope for the east side of Topeka. I'm from Topeka, 11 Kansas. And the reason being, there was a facility there, a 12.. big ugly fenced structure that was a boys reform school. It's 13.. now a women's prison. .That's about four miles from my family 14 farm. And I'd -like to share with you, inthe red folder there 15 on the left side, are some reproductions of -pictures I asked my 16 dad to ,take and send to me. The ,top right corner- Is that 17 facility, and that's as close asone canget to take pictures 18 becauseit's fenced and the, guards won't let you drive any 19 closer to that. The other three pictures on that page are of 20 surrounding area_ It's a. depressed, area,. low income housing, 21, kind of trashy ugly areas, if you will. By,.contrast, on the 22,__ right flap there of the red folder,is the west side of 23 Topeka, Kansas. And there's,.a recent newspaper article there, 24._ ,that was November. 14th. And very briefly, it shows just an. 25 awful lot of activity, it's all on_the west side.. There's a. 194 1 1 'I 1 huge mall there, above average housing, good schools. Now, 2 that doesn't prove anything and no"one-can predict that the 3 same thing might happen,in Del Camino -area. No one can 4 say that it will not. 5 If this prison, pre -parole prison is 'aviable 6 business, a good thing to do, let's do it. But let's put it 7 somewhere more appropriate, I -would say. More appropriate in 8' a community that needs and wants it, that could thrive with 9 its existence. It seems to me there is an overwhelming -amount 10 of evidence that everyone has presented. You can see for 11 yourself, if you will, the evidence points out that we don't 12 think it's good for our community. It's not, in'our opinion, 1 e 13 good for 1-25 corridor, for the area for the community, for 14 southwest Weld County. We just don't want it there. I don't 15 want it there. As a -property owner, I don't want to look out 16 my window and see something that might be like the pictures on 17 the left side there. Thank you. 18 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Thank you and are there any 19 questions for Ms. England? 'Frank-Canapa. Just a moment, 20 Frank, after we get through with your presentation, we will go` 21 to those that signed up. Is David Schwind in the audience? 22 All right, you will be next. 23 MR. CANAPA: Good evening. "I recognize that it's-- 24 been a fairly long day for everyone. On the other `hand, I- 25 think a couple issues need to&'be identified. We have some 195 I 1 facts here.. I think if, as you receive the documentation that 2 I have, provided, you'-ll see some information that I was able 3 to receive from the Department of Corrections down in Canon 4 City in terms of how they project prisoner population. We 5 used November 1992 because that was the information that he 6 said that he had compiled, and so forth.. And what I, did was, 7 if you take a .look at this information, it basically 8 classifies the inmate population; total number of admissions 9 or expected admissions,_for the month of November 1992. And 10 then I went to a law library, which was an effort in, itself 11 for someone who doesn't, who's not a lawyer, and basically 12 spent hours turning through the Colorado Revised Statutes of 13 saying, gee if you're a: class ,one offender what does that 14 really mean, what did you have to do to get there? So I'd 15 like you to kind of hold this information off to one side so 16 that you can refer back toit as we go through my presentation 17 this afternoon. 18 . I think one of the key issues that needs to be: 19 addressed, this morning we wereaddressed as if we weren't: 20 patient with people and; we weren't prepared to give people a,- 21 fair chance and all .those ;.types of things.. This is a study 22 that was done by the Department of Corrections: in 1989 and 23 this was the, conclusion. And.if go back through there, 24 about 50% of all the inmates that are in prison, these are 25 felonious offenders, convicted,,all those types of things. 196 I 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i l Half of them are there because they committed the felony for 2 which they are in prison while they were on parole, on 3 probation or in community corrections. So we have a legal 4 system here that's basically said, hey we've given .you one 5 chance, obviously you didn't learn your lesson because you 6 came back again. So it's a situation where, and I've listened 7 to the presentations of the proponents of this particular 8 facility and I've heard statements that only 17% of the 9 inmates in the correction facility or in the prison system are 10 eligible for pre -parole. And I'm like, okay guys, if we go 11 back here, which 17%? If you look down at the bottom, and we 12 go through these numbers and we -say, okay, which 17% but also 13 recognize the fact that of the 17% you get, half of them are 14 already on their second tour. So, I mean, let's not confuse 15 ourselves about what this situation is all about.. 16 Aswemove forward, I think we have to look at what 17 the Colorado Revised Statutes has to say. And again, I'm not 18 an attorney. -I took this verbatim from the CRS statutes and: 19 so -'forth and it says here what can go into a minimumsecurity 20 facility. And this is the neat` part -- they'- use the term 21 facility. In the RFP that was referred to by the proponents, 22 the terminology "rehabilitation center", the word 23 rehabilitation is not in -this document and if you're -familiar` 24- with RFP's you know that this is the -basis for which you state 25 your business -case to respond and so forth. But that: 197 1 2 be implied or whatever the case may be. And the term "center" 3 is not used. As you can see here, they use the term 4 "offender" and if you go through the proposal, they don't talk 5 about them as residents, they don't talk about them as 6 patients, they would use the word "inmates and offenders". So 7 if there's any confusion in your mind -about what this thing 8 really is, it's a prison. 9 Again, referring back to the RFP, what is the 10 objective of pre -parole facilities? And I will leave this 11 copy with you for,your review. A stated objective and program 12 goal, goal number one: to expand prison capacity.. Real clear. 13 What are the objectives to get inmates out of Canon City so 14 that we have effectively, more beds available. So we go 15 through this thing and we say, who can go- to a minimum 16 security facility? It's right there.: 'If you spend six months 17 or more in a higher security area or ,facility at any point in 18 time, you can be assigned -to a minimum security facility. And 19 that's what this thing is, with one exception. If the state 20 comes back and we have these three individuals, these are the, 21 diagnostics folks, who say Joe Bob's not a bad guy, he really 22 doesn't need to stay in a, higher level security facility for 23 six months, we can send, him._to: minimum-securityif we all 24 agree on it. Now, what does that mean to The Villa? . There is 25 a clause in here, in the RFPthat basically says and this is. terminology ?rehabilitation" -;is not in 198 that document.. It may 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 part of the response and you are bound by this response if you 2 submit a proposal, and I'll read it verbatim: "The contractor 3 may not unreasonably refuse to accept any offender assigned to 4 the facility." Not any patient, any offender assigned to the 5 facility. So in the RFP you say, congratulations, because 6 I've submitted the RFP there's a clause in here that says you 7 agree to be bound by the terms and conditions in the Jul'. We 8 also have a state statute that says at any time I can send any 9 person to a minimum security facility as long. as we satisfy 10 those conditions and The Villa, according to this RFP, cannot 11 refuse. ,Significant issues. -Ma'am? 12 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: I just have a question that if 13 they cannot send them after six months unless they go on - 14 parole because they have to be on parole in order to go to 15'' this? Is that not right? 16 MR. CANAPA: The RFP says that you can't 17 unreasonably refuse to accept any offender assigned'to the 18 facility. That's what the RFP says, Ma'am. 19 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: I'll wait- until Mr. Coppom has 20 his rebuttal, would you make a note of that and answer my 21 question? 22 - MR. CANAPA: And then the state, intheRFP, states - 23 that they expect people to stay there between 90`and 180 days. 24 But you know as well as I do situations change, there's 25 legislative fiat, Governor -Romer has 'an -agenda that he's: 199 1 trying to drive, so .you_ change the rules to: fit what your 2 'moods are at any given point in -time. 3 We talked about it as, .a rehabilitation center and 4 everything else. I. think the semantics here are fairly clear 5 based on the objectives we're hereto expand the number of 6 bedsin the corrections system. That's stated here and I'll 7 leave this information with your attorney. 8 Let's take a look at some of the other facts because 9 we've been accusedof beingtoo emotional and...not having the 10 facts. And I'm not an emotional individual, you probably can 11 tell. State Senator Bill Owen quoted, "Colorado imprisons 12 only 38 felons for 1,000 serious offenses", so now all of 13 . this, Ma'am? 14 CHAIRMAN.HARBERT: Just a minute. We're .going to 15 stick to the fact of whether -this is ..right for this area. 16 We're not going to go through the state bills because we have 17 no control over those bills._ 18 MR. CANAPA: Absolutely, and I agreewith you. I 19 think my point here., Ma'am, is the fact, number one is this a 20 prison facility or is it a rehabilitation center? And I'm 21 trying to prove a point that there shouldn't be any 22 misconception of what this really is. It's a secured 23 facility. It's locked down, that type of thing. I will honor 24 that request. 25 .CHAIRMAN HARBERT:. I'll.ask legal counsel to keep us 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I I 200 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 on track, will you do that for us Lee? 2 MR. MORRISON: Sure. I''think that Mr. Canapa has 3 heard what you said and he will try and tie what he presents 4 into that. 5 MR. CANAPA: I will do that. So we have some facts 6 about what's going on in the state and I'll let you read those 7 on your own. Okay. What does this mean to Weld County? 8 Number one, the state has identified early on as a condition 9 in the RFP that says,` at the request of the pre -parole staff, 10 you could pull an inmate, an offender, out of the pre -parole 11 facility and transfer them to a local jail, has an impact on 12 Weld County and the impact supersedes the Del Camino area. 13 Statement number two: who's assigned to this 14 facility? Basically it says any inmate that doesn't qualify 15 for community corrections. The proponents referred to the 16 people upstairs in community corrections that have in -out 17 privileges to this building and that nobody should be 18 concerned and everything else. They also said, gee you have 19 a facility down the street which is the Weld County Jail, 20 which is more towards maximum security, okay. But in a 21 maximum security facility like'the Weld County Jail, when you 22 lock down you have two inmates per cell, and you can'lock the 23 door and they're stuck and the inmates can't have access or 24 they have extremely limited access to'one another 'during a 25 lock -down situation. when`' you "look at this particular' 201 1 facility you have 36 guys in one room. Now, I'm a high school 2 teacher. I've taught In some fairly severe schools in 3 California that had bad reputations and all those types of 4 things, taking care of 20 high school kids is a handful for 5 one person. And I'm going to take 36 and as many as 50 6 inmates in a single room where they bunk together, there's no 7 privacy. When you lock them down, you lock 36 people 8 together. You haven't signed up for that in the Weld County 9 Jail, you say isolate them two at a time. Boulder County 10 facility is the same way, because of the types of offenders 11 they have and everything else. We have this impression that 12 this is really a country club, that you know, we go to school 13 and in the RFP they mandate that it's 12 weeks of classes, 5 14, days a week,.8 hours a day and everything else. It's all 15 mandated in the RFP. So we go through and we look at this and 16 one of the key issues is, and this is the state requirement, 17 that the community knowledgeably approves of the facility 18 located in their area. And that's verbatim.out of this RFP. 19 Ladies and gentlemen, it's really difficult for me 20 when we have somewhere on the order of 1,800 plus signatures 21 of people in the community, you've had business people up here 22 saying we're not convinced this is.the right thing to. do. The 23 Tri-Area Planning Board, the. Mead Town Council, your own 24 Planning Commission has come.. back and said we don't support 25 this. That's one of the requisites of the state on this 202 I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 proposal and it's stated there in black and white. 2 The other thing is the transportation issue. 3 Secured vehicle, the RFP states two daily trips from two to 4 four inmates and everything else. There will be inmates out 5 on the public highways. No two ways about it, they will be 6 secured. The question you have to ask yourself is if this is 7 really a rehabilitation center,. why do we have two fences 8 which are buried below grade, why are the inmates restrained, 9 why do we have lock down, all of those types of things, if 10 this really isn't a prison and that's exactly what it is. 11 A couple of other things we need to address and 12 these are the factors that you have to address. Number one, 13 the developers do not have a contract. There is an implied 14 agreement on the Joint Budget Committee that says if you can 15 get all of this approved in Weld County, yeah we'll send you 16 prisoners. But as far as I'm concerned, this is like buying 17 a piece of property and telling your real estate agent, here's 18 the home I want, four bedrooms, 2-1/2 baths, family room, the 19 whole go round and your real estate agent signs a -contract for 20 you and calls you up and says I found a perfect home for you, 21 -we've got a contract on' it and everything else, and you 22 haven't seen it. 'Because there is not a contract with the• 23 state and an RFP is basically the basis for a contract, but 24--- any RFP as the county purchasing folks will tell you, it's 25 open for negotiation. That's -the point from which' you begin 203 1 negotiating. So you're in:a:position now, you're being asked 2 to approve something where you don't have all the details. We 3 heard the thing, we'll set up a relationship with the Longmont 4 Swat Team. Yeah, we'll get that, oh, you want this type of 5 restriction, oh, we'll negotiate that into the contract. And 6 my question is how can you sign up for something when you 7 don't know what the hard and fast terms and conditions are? 8 That's just good business... 9 The second thing is Kathy gave a presentation about 10 the concerns about the financial, viability of this type of 11 project. One-third of them have failed. 12 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: I don't think that's a problem 13 for us. I mean, that's the pre -parole facility, their 14 corporation's problem, I don't 15 MR. CANAPA: But it's, different than a business, 16 Ma'am. Because the facility is there and it's, designed to do 17 one thing. So what happens if- that facility financially is, 18 not viable. And I'm not talking about the risk that the 19 shareholders assume. A couple of different -things that can 20 happen. Somebody else comes in and runs it under a new 21 contract, the state comes in -and takes it over, or it sits 22 there idle like the ones down in Texas did. But it's 23 something that, as.you -go through your evaluation, you're in Z4 a.. position to say if I construct -this • thing tomorrow, the 25 depreciable life on any type of -building under the IRS laws is 204 I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 '20 years. You haveto look at your decision as being, if I 2 make the decision today; it's going to have an impact for a 3 minimum of the next 20 years. And my response is, but you 4 don't have all the facts to make that decision, so how can you 5 approve this? There's 'overwhelming opposition in the 6 community. I find it, and I'm kind of flabbergasted for a 7 lack of a betterterm, that the majority, if not all of the 8 people, and I lost count, who came up here and said what a 9 great idea this was for Weld County, the closest one is about 10 11 miles away. If I lived 11 miles away, it's`` like the 11 landfill down' in Erie. I'm 9 miles from it. It's a non -issue - 12 for me. But I know the people in Erie are suffering with it 13 If I lived 11 miles away up in Berthoud or'if on 26th 14 Avenue in Greeley this would be a"non-issue for me -because my 15 perspective is when Ault decided to pursue the 'prison 16 facility, I said obviously the people in Ault must be in favor 17 of it because they appear to be determined to make that 18 happen. You go through this process and you say that there's 19 overwhelming opposition=-- 1,900 residents, you have the map 20 in front of you and you're saying the•precedence.of"one $6-- 21 acre option, doesn't even own the property, takes precedence 22 over square miles of people that are opposed to this, who have 23 been long-time residents of the -community. And I think that' 24 needs to be considered. I think there is a' key issue here, 25 and again the --attorneys have"touched'on it and I'll let theme 205 i 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 1 wrestle with that, -it's not.a rehabilitation center, it's not 2 a hospital. They're inmates, they're offenders._ By; any way, 3 shape or form of the imagination,, this is a prison facility 4 and you've already heard- our attorney speak that prison 5 facilities are not a listed use.for-this area and it requires 6 a change of zoning. Okay, the on -going issue -of police and:fire, you've .heard all of that. -And-the key thing is, Mr. Brand made a statement down at the„Tri-Area. Planning,' commission, that approximately 608 of -the inmates in this facility will be from Denver -metro. .If you take, -a look at Denver -metro, three different occasions they have voted this thing out. Recently with Lowery Air Force Base, they,:were talking about putting the youth detention facility -there and people said it will. 15 impact rent. We've got Colorado -University Medical Center 16 ready to take over some of the space _and they said if you put 17 it in there it's not going_ -to happen. The other thing is 18 there is a facility that was shown on -9-News last week, a 19 facility -that's already constructed_ in Denver, it doesn't have 20 an inmate in it. 21 Other factors. , We talked -about the -economic 22 development. Colorado Business Magazine, the first statement 23 is by a Department of Corrections -official who said you can't_ 24,. print my name, because it, will put me.:-out.of a job. And we've 25 :already experienced that, where the- pressure is -flowing 206 I I I I I I I I I i I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 downhill from Capitol Hill that basically says you need to be 2. real careful if you're a' state employee about talking -against 3 this particular issue. But'you have a prison official who 4 says, hey it's not going to be an economic boom especially if S there's no place for the employees to live. The average 6 salary $25,000', maybe $30,000'a year. The average price of a 7 home down in that area is well in excess of $100,000 Those 8 people can't afford to live there and -I think the proponents 9 alluded to the tact Where would your employees come from -- 10 Larimer County, Boulder, Longmont, Northglenn, Thornton. One 11 of the gentlemen came back, yeah and maybe some from -Frederick 12 and Dacono. But they've already identified the issue that 13 says the majority of the -people are not going to live in Weld 14 County. Yeah, there'll be a couple of folks that come from 15 Greeley, but I'm going to tell you what; on S25,000 a year, 16 the commuting costs are significant. 17 We talk about the housing rates. The Town of 18 Florence wherelthe Federal Correction Institute is or facility 19 is, they actively pursued that facility, as did Buena Vista, 20 as did Delta, as did Limon, as did Ordway. The community went 21 out and pursued it. In Florence they had bake sales to buy 22 the land for the Federal Government to build the facility on. 23 And my position here' -is, as much as Florence had the 24 opportunity to embrace having -a prison facility built in their 25 community; -think- the 'people, in -southwest Weld County who. 207 1 live by this, facility also should have the opportunity to say 2 no, we don't think it's in our best interest. -It works both 3 ways. There was a statement in, -the Denver Post or in the 4 Longmont Times Call that says, from one of the prison 5 facilities that says,:if this prison is not pursued in Weld 6 County, I guess we'll have to go to. a rural community that 7 really wants it. And the proponents are sitting there saying 8, we want it in Weld County because it's to our benefit, because 9 it's easier for us to manage it even though Canon City said 10 we'll take ,it in a heartbeat. They have the full 11 infrastructure in place. 12 We, talk about some of the other factors here,, about 13 the bidding, process. We talked about, gee,. $100,000 a year in 14 revenue to Weld County businesses. _Two dollars and 50 cents 15 a day for 400 employees, over 300 days., you, start doing the 16 math and it's really insignificant in terms of the amount of 17 revenue relative to the total amount of risk that the county's 18 going to be asked to assume and the residents in thearea are 19 going to. be asked:to.assume. 20 And then the last; -statement, as far as I'm 21_ concerned, who knows aboutprison. towns more -.so than the 22. people down in Canon City, is Steve Thackerwho says don't be 23 fooled, prison may be overstatedInterms of its -salvation. - 24 We talk about 110_jobs, but when you go, through, and I, called 25 ,the folks down,with the Texas:State Departmentof 208 I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 and I said, how many people do they really employ? And they said a lot of the services they contract out for. They contract out to somebody like MTC in Ogden to come in and design and build and teach the training courses. So I think if you take a look at, or the conclusion that I've made is I don't think all the facts are there. I've given you what I deemed to be the facts. The proponents have given you what they deemed ` to be' the facts. But the key question is, if you don't have a contract with and conditions identified, how can you sign up you look beyond all the political forces that Denver with Governor Romer and his agenda, the all the terms for this? If play down in Department of 13 Corrections who are saying our number one agenda with this RFP- 14 is we're running out of beds in Canon City, we ,don't want to 15 go through the fight of going into communities and generating 16 support for this. We'll let private firms take the risk and 17 in this proposal it states that they will -grant a $60,000 18 interest -free loan to a developer to go through the entire 19 process that we've gone over the last six months. This is not. 20 an altruistic agenda, believe me. There's a lot of political' 21 force at play behind this, -and I think if you objectively sit - 22 down and look at all of these things, I'm not questioning the 23 integrity of the proponents. I will question the motivations, 24 of the Department of Corrections, but then again "that's their - 25 job, and never lose sight of that•fact,:but I think-if,you go' 209 1 through this and you say, basically_ how come we .approved this 2 when we don't know what the final contract looks like. It's 3 a prison facility. They cannot unreasonably refuse to accept 4 any inmate, assigned by the Department of Corrections. And I 5 think you have to vote no on that basis. Any questions, 6 please? 7` CHAIRMAN HARDER?.: Any, questions for Mr. Canapa? 8 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: How many people live in 9 those blue areas on that map? Do you have that number? 10 MR. CANAPA:. In the blue areas? 300 to 400, I don't 11 -know.. I mean, the_thing is, I have a.proponent standing here 12 in front of me that says my 56 acres is more important than 13 the three sections, four sections equivalent there to there. 14 That's the issue. Mr. Kahn, who I spoke to on the phone says, 15 well if I lived in your area I might feel differently. He 16 owns about 10, 12 acres down there right below this facility. 17 He's an attorney, where -does he live? He lives in Denver. So 18 if you want to talk about not_ in; my backyard, that's what 19 basically Mr. Kahn said to me. He said,, you know, you can't 20 build all these things in Denver. And I said well why not, if 21 60% of the inmates are from. Denver. Visitation issues, civil 22. rights issues, access, all -of. those kinds of things,, -if you 23 built it in Denver where you have public transportation. Help 24 me.. You have people here that owna considerable amount of 25- property that they, would like to:develop in the future, and I 210 I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 r 1 1 1 0 1 think that's a key issue. No one here has -stood up -in front 2-- of you that said I'm against any growth in the area and 3 everything else. Flatirons is there, Specialty Products is 4 there, employs 65-70 people, has -a super nice' facility. 5 Hauser Chemical built a facility. You didn't see 200 people 6 take time out of a full day of work to come up here and say we 7 don't want Hauser in there, we don't want Specialty in there; 8 we don't want Texaco to knock it down and build a new station, 9 we don't want McDonald's. The people understand, but that 10 corridor is going to be developed, but I think there has to be 11 a degree of sensitivity to the typeof development that's 12 going to go on in that area. And based on this, where you 13 don't have the terms and conditions detailed. Buy your house 14 without a contract, it's illegal. And what I'm saying here is 15 why buy this without a contract? There is no contract in 16 place with the state today. Anything else? Thank you. 17 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: We have Dave Schwind next. Then 18 Sandy Ingram should be ready. Again, I want to bring your 19 attention to this pamphlet where it instructs you to be sure 20 that whatever you say is relevant and that they should not be 21 repetitious. If you believe -what somebody else has said, 22 would you just agree with that person, referencing what they 23 said and not elaborate on It. Thank you. 24 MR. SCHWIND: /Chairman Harbert and fellow 25 Commissioners, my name -is' Dave' Schwind. I'm with the 211 1 I 1 Prudential and part owner of Prudential Real Estate office in 2 Longmont. I live at 17890 Weld County Road S. My residence 3 is six, seven miles north of the property. I have family 4 members that own property,, two different family members that 5 own property within approximately 1/2 mile of this.project. 6 I had looked at this. map a little. while ago and the 7 map is showing property owners that's just primarily to the 8 east of the site that you're talking. Now I personally know 9 there's people here that lives to the west and to the- north 10 that's not included on this. map. 11 MR. MORRISON:: Excuse me,:which map are we talking 12 about? 13 MR. SCHWIND: This :little map right here that. 14 MR,. MORRISON:; The one that is 6F. 15 MR. SCHWIND: The pink is the facility that you're 16 talking about and all the blue, is basically people to. the east 17 of it. I'm not a polished speaker ,and I didn't come here 18 today to speak. I came to hear what everybody had to say. 19 And speaking as a lay person,.I. heardpeople trying to talk 20 about definitions of institutions and all this kind of stuff, 21. and really, no matter how you cut it; if you see a facility of. 22 a chain link fence or barbed-wire;or that type of thing, to me 23 it's a prison._ And to the eyes, it 'becomes a perception, and 24 to the eyes of people looking -.for real estate it's still a 25 prison. We had also heard some people talk about the -facility 212 1 I I I 1 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 in Fort Collins and a facility in Boulder. And we also heard 2 Mr. Dyer talk about the facility in Longmont. ,.These are 3 county or city justice centers that house police departments. 4 As you drive by these facilities you may see 20, 30 police 5 cars there. We're talking about a private facility here where' .6 we may see one weld County Sheriff's car, maybe a mile away at 7 the fire district. I think we're talking about two different 8 type of facilities. The one. in Fort Collins, I'm familiar 9 with that. That is in a development area. The lady that had 10 talked about it, they are the developers of the property and 11 they are leasing end selling those properties. And when you 12 have a city facility there, such as in Boulder where they have' 13 a development nearby, those are. pretty secure facilities. 14 When you talk about property values, and this is the area that 15 I feel pretty comfortable in talking about. If we just kind 16 of back up a number of years, I've been, in this business a 17 long time. Years and years ago when we started talking about 18 the racetrack that was going to be there on I-25 just north of 19 this property, there was a' tremendous amount of speculation 20 going on. And at that time, the activity in the Del Camino'; 21 area just skyrocketed.. It..was kind of like the oil booms. 22' And all of a sudden when the racetrack didn't go, there was a: 23 lot of people that speculated and made some major purchases.. 24 and found that their purchases was 'purely _speculative and: 25 their values went•: downhill. Tocoincidealong with- that, as 213 1 you know what's happened to our economy, our economy went 2 right down the tubes along with the :oil boom. And if you 3 start talking about Texas, Oklahoma, Colorado, all of us is 4 really: affected by oil -type 'prices. And I think that alone 5 had inspired some of these towns in Texas to show some 6 interest in some of these facilities because they needed to 7 develop an economic base. We have had,some organizations that 8 speculated, when we start talking the -Del Camino area, they 9 were looking at. what kind of growth is there going to be, 10 how's it going tojust go out of hand? I remember I sat at 11 meetings that were property owners had gotten together with 12' various planners andthose planners had come to the Weld 13 County Commissioners at that time and presented their program 14 of how they thought that area ought to develop. And I believe 15 some of that:was incorporated in.your Comprehensive Plan. 16 The sanitation district was formed primarily to help 17 that area develop and at the time that they had formed that, 18. the economy was going downhill. Probably the timing wasn't 19 quite what it should have:: been for them, and financially I 20 think that they're in kind -of a. tough shape. This would 21. certainly give a good boost to them if this were, to go in. 22 We've- heard from businesses in the area that are 23 saying that yeah, they're in favor'.of it. And again you have 24 to look at the type of business that it is. You know, it's a 25 service business that will definitely benefit by the traffic -- 214 I I I I i I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 that's coming there. The people'that they -serve primarily at 2 this point in time, is people that's traveling up and down the 3 interstate. Their realm of growth -is somewhat limited unless 4 the area were to grow, and for a -facility like this, it would 5 certainly benefit them. 6 In a real estate business it's kind of a fickle 7 business when we start -talking -about property values. In the 8 last year and a half we've seen our property values- really 9 appreciate quite rapidly. One of the reasonsisbecause of 10 the interest rates 'being down more -people can qualify for: 11 larger amount of monies. People can qualify for homes they' 12 couldn't in the past, and people just keepmoving up in value. 13 When we go to list a property, one of -the questions -that we- 14 have to ask people is do you'know-of anything -that's -going to 15 affect your property values in the future. And at this point 16 in time, all of the residents in this area is going to have 17 to, if they're looking at wanting to sell their property, 18 they're going -to have to say; yeah there is something that may 19 affect our property value, that there may be a correctional 20 facility, a prison, an institution,' whatever you want to call 21 it, is going to be up the road. It's going to be two miles, 22 three miles, five miles away. y. It's going to have some effect. 23 And then when we have some buyers that's coming in, we're 24 going to have to disclose to those people that there is a 25 facility there, whatever you -want to call 'it. Andthefirst, 215 1 thing, if I were to -ask you, -would you be interested in -buying 2 a property located next or near,a facility like this, probably 3 deep down out of. your heart you'd say, well no, I wouldn't be 4 interested in buying, that. People that's going to have to 5 sell their property, eventually they're going to have to keep 6 lowering their prices to -the point where a buyer would say 7 this is too good of a deal that ->I can't pass up. _And the 8 point of it is that these values are going to drop. As a 9 result of these property values dropping, the taxes, the 10 property taxes that the county -is realizing at this point in 11 time, is -also going to drop. And you know, sure you're going 12 to receive some dollars in -from the facility there as -far as 13 property taxes, but I think the damage is goingto exceed that 14 and -I know that when -we start talking about the Town of Mead, 15 the Tni-Town area and the amount of, people that has been 16 opposed to this, the question -has come up, is it compatible 17 with the area? I would have to think that the amount of 18 people that's saying no -that it is. not :compatible., with the 19 area. That's all I have to say, Thank you. 20 - CHAIRMAN.HARBERT: Are thereany questions; for Mr:_; 21 .Schwind? •Sandy Ingram And -then Wendy Hoffman, are you; 22 available Wendy?- Wendy Hoffman. Okay, will you be ready to- 23 speak next? - - 24 MS.INGRAM: My1 name is Sandy Ingram. I live at 25 7201 Weld County Road 11. .I -am- three•miles •aouth.of the: 216 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 i 1 facility. I'd like to state that I am here representing 2 myself as a citizen and as a spokesman for the members of 3 CRASH which stands for Citizens Rebelling Against Safety 4 Hazards. 5 I'm here to state that I'm opposed to allowing 6 another noxious use in southern Weld. This is a trend that's 7 developed over the'years and it's a trend that we have to put 8 a stop to. I see a lot of yellow stickers -saying here that we 9 need to vote on the facts. Well"here's a fact, folks. This 10 facility is a noxious use. That's the fact of it. A noxious 11 use is not compatible. If it was compatible it wouldn't be a 12 noxious use. Southern Weld once again is taking on Denver's 13 problems. We have heard that we'll be housing, in one of our 14 the planning commission meeting, The Villa stated that 60% of 15 the inmates would' be coming from Denver, also 60% `of the 16 workforce will be coming from Denver. Sounds like it needs to 17 be located in Denver. 18 The Regional Land Use Planning Task Force was formed 19 because of too many noxious uses wanting to locate in southern 20 Weld. Thornton and Northglenn got in on this deal too because 21 they felt the same way. This policy was formed to preserve 22 the agricultural integrity of the area. Later, the Tri-towns, 23 Frederick, Firestone and Dacono, also came up with an 24 intergovernmental agreement between the townships because they 25 wanted to regulate these noxious uses also and preserve the 217 t 1 agricultural integrity. And I'd like to read from that IGA. 2 "Municipalities desire to maintain the rural nature of certain 3 geographical areas which are now . characterized by 4 agricultural, non -industrial, residential estate and open 5 spaces environmental integrity of those areas." Under land 6, use they state, "The municipalities agree to use their best 7 .efforts to maintain the character of the area and the 13 adjoining property which,is now characterized by agricultural, 9 non -industrial, residential estate and open space land uses._ 10 The municipalities further agree each do adopt as part of 11 .their Comprehensive Plans policies regulating noxious land 12 uses." 13 Recreational and :environmental planning. The 14 municipalities agree to cooperate with each other and other 15 affected agencies and individuals. in the planning of 16 recreational opportunities within the area and planning to 17 maintain and enhance the environmental integrity of the area. 18 This planning shall focus on preserving ;the aesthetic values 19. and environmental integrity of the area and restricting 20 incompatible land uses whichwould have a detrimental effect 21 on the recreational, environmental potential of the area. 22 The developmental referral states, ..Each 23 municipality further agrees that each such zoning, rezoning, 24 . PUD, conditional or special use and subdivision application. 25 proposal shall compatible with the rural character currently 2113 I I I 1 1 I i 1 I I I I I I r 1 1 existing in the area." These boundaries go right up to this 2 facility and I think this is in direct conflict with the Tri- 3 Towns. It's not compatible, it's not in their Comprehensive 4 Plans, it's not in their future master plans, and eventually 5 the Tri-Towns will probably be incorporated into this entire 6 area out there. 7 I'm not going to state everything from the Growth 8 and Preservation Policy,' but I do think that one policy here 9 really, truly kind of sums it all up. "Any development which 10 could endanger public health, safety or welfare shall be 11 discouraged." Due to the number of current proposed uses that 12 have a potential for high negative impact on the region, the 13 area cannot sustain further degradation. 14 This facility -does not provide any services to the 15 community. It has a factor on our health, safety and welfare. 16 The area does not have any services to provide back to this 17 facility, so we are not getting any benefit from it. They 18 will have to go to Longmont, they'll have to go to Denver, 19 they'll have to go to Boulder. We have no food service 20 vendors out there that can help them. Again, the work force' 21 its already stated that' it's going to come from Denver. We've' 22 got a problem with 119 and anybody that hasn't experienced 23 that interchange yet really should because it's a real -thrill' 24 during traffic time. I-dont think that`we could really 25 propose a facility out here until road improvements are made."' 219 1 1 If we've got people coming up from Denver that have -to use 2 119, and. they see what it's like, they're going to say, uh, 3 we're not going use 119, we're going to use something else. 4 Well, the next road is 52, 80 they're. going to be using 52 up 5 to service road. Fifty-two is right next in line behind 119 6 for thrills a minute when it comes to rush hour. Either that 7 or they're going to be using our_dirt roads, and I think were 8 going to have.a definite impact. on some of these roads out. 9 there. And again, in the Growth and. Preservation Policy, it 10 states about impacts on these roads. 11 I've, heard how great this ty pe of .facility is for 12 cities. All examples have been given with the business parks 13 are in cities. How will they affect an agricultural 14 community? Or to useMr. Coppom's words, -"the boondocks"? 15 Ann Garrison's report addresses cities, nothing in the rural 16 communities. I hear property values on lots, but I've never 17 heard property values on acreages. _Police protection is a 18 real problem out there. Our 911 communications has been 19 termed as a Bermuda Triangle. It. has improved recently a 20. little bit,, but I talked to the. Weld County Sheriff's 21 Department and according to him, we have three officers that 22 patrol the area from Berthoud down to the county line, and 23 from county line to county line. If, by chance, there isn't 24 an officer, is on vacation or sick or it's his day off, then 25 the officers from the other sectors respond, to that sector. 220 I I 1, 1 I I i r 1 1 My personal experience', not just once but twice, has been a 2 20 -minute response time from the Weld County Sheriff's 3 Department. With this type of facility, I feel that this is 4 a very inadequate response time out there. It just won't 5 happen. In those terms, the burden of police protection is 6 going to fall on Dacono, Frederick, Firestone and'Mead. As 7 far as I know, Dacono is the only one with a 24 -hour police 8 force 'right now and these towns cannot sustain the financial 9 impact that that will have on them. Therefore, the tax burden 10 will be on the taxpayers. I don't feel that this should be 11 our burden but there.' We're not asking for this facility, but 12 it's coming in -anyway. 13 In Ann' Garrisons -report, if I can read from it, it 14 states on here, we've been talking about escapees. "The Villa 15 in Greeley has housed more -than 1;800'people'in 3.5 years with 16 10 walk-aways. Tilts is per John Coppom in 1992.'.I'd like to. 17 point out that this facility is going to house -1,800 people in' 18 one year, and -that's -based on 386 beds proposed on a 90 -day 19 minimum stay. 20 Again, we're touching' on the fire departments and 21' the EMT's are all volunteers out there. They're not paid" 22 forces. They're great people,' they'll do their best, but then 23 again we're not dealing with paid forces out there. This is 24 a problem. I've heard about -'SWAT teams. The nearest SWAT 25 team is 20 minutes away. Loveland's 30, Greeley's 45. I" 221 1 8 9 10. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 haven't heard anything about any type of intergovernmental 2 agreements between the_ Tri-Towns for using .any of their 3 agencies. 4 I have a problem with an accountability conflict of 5 the facility. The, people making._the bucks are making the 6 decisions and if you.use Ann Garrison's report, and facts or figures that I obtained from Dave .Owen of the Joint Budget Committee, they'll be making roughly, if you use the Joint Budget Committee's figures,_$2.,25 million a year. If you use Ann Garrison's report, $3.75 million.a year. I was also told by Dave Owen that should they decide.to raise their prices at any time, that the state doesn't have to go along with it. They can pull that contract at any, time, they don't have to stick with it. Ann Garrison's report also talks about this type of facility canwork.with good management. I think this is where the accountability issuecomes in, with good .management and making dollars. The Villa will have you believe.they are building this facility as a community service, so why haven't they proposed on giving something back to ;the .community. For recreational districts, we have a water/sewerline project which they will benefit from. About the Tri-Towns, a lot of the business owners money and we've had _heard anything from along I-25 have gotten together, pooled _grants turned_, down,. but yet we haven't them. I've heard nothing to help us 222 1 I 1 1 1 i 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 provide a special district for our police, fire, EMT's. I 2 feel that this just is not compatible and it's not in growth 3 of the Tri-Towns and the Tri-Towns will be the ones that are 4 mainly affected here. I would hope -that if you do pass this, 5 that there are some very strict regulations put on here 6 because it sounds like the state can do just about anything. 7 Thank you. 8 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Are there any questions for Ms. 9 Ingram? 10 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: What kind of restrictions 11 are you talking about? I have a- copy of your letter here, is 12 that what you intended? 13 MS. INGRAM: Pretty much, I would like to see police 14 protection in the area paid for by The Villa. I'd like to see 15 the employees only coming from Weld County. I would like to 16 see a board of directors govern the place that had basically' 17 the power to decide who can come into the facility and who - 18 cannot. I'd like to make sure there are no repeat offenders 19 allowed in. I -have a problem with their visitation. I'd like 20 to see that restricted. I'd like to see a minimum stay put- down. But I'd like to see $8 per bed be turned back into the' 22 area. 23 COMMISSIONER HALL: Can you define for me -"noxious 24 use"? 25 MS.` INGRAM: A''noxious use. I wish -I` had a- 223 1 Webster's Dictionary. One that will have a negative impact on 2 the community. Any other, questions? 3 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Wendy Hofmann and then Dave 4 Koehler. Is Dave Koehler in the audience? No, all right. h1 5 Roberts? 6 MS. HOFMANN: Good evening Madam Chairman, 7 Commissioners. My name is Wendy Hofmann. I reside with my 8 husband and three small daughters at 1068 Glendale Circle in 9 10 11 12 13 14., 15, 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 the City of Dacono which is approximately 5 miles south of the proposed prison facility. My children attend an independent Montessori school located approximately 2-1/2 miles south of this site. And I work at Carbon Valley Animal Hospital in Firestone which is approximately. -3 miles south from this proposed site. .I -am active in our, community, currently serving as .thepresident of the. Carbon Valley Chamber of Commerce, Vice -President of the. Carbon Valley Parks and Recreation Districts, Finance Commissioner and . Parks Commissioner in the City of Dacono,_ of which I am a council member. Today, I do not stand .here before you representing anyofthese districts. I do not stand before you as an elected .official nor as. An appointed official. But I stand: here before you as a resident of southwest Weld County with grave concerns, and let me reiterate concerns, not fears, as to the future of direction of this area. Because of my close. association with, these and other government entities, 1 224 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 I 2 3. 4 5 6 7 8- 9 believe I comebefore this commission as a very informed resident possessing a clear understanding of the economic direction in this part of the county. There are many points in today's presentations that I take issuewith. -Among them are the safety concerns. regarding emergency response times. The communication concerns due to the 911 communication dilemmas and the over -extended budgets of one city, two towns, two fire departments,` three ambulance district, all of 10 overtaxing and under -serving police departments, and one which have been accused of the area already. But most 11 importantly -to me is the'economic-impact to this area. It has 12 been stated that this area, or that other areas, have seen an 13 increase in development since siting a prison in their. 14 communities. I invite you -down to our neck -of the woods, to 15 look around. You will see an increase in development, both 16 residential and commercial without a prison sited here, and we 17 will continue to see this trend. Colorado is experiencing an 18 economic boom and our communities sit in the direct path of 19 development. The highway corridor has always been and will 20 always be key to our community growth. It is not seen as a' 21 barrier which has been stated in the past presentations. 22 If you take 1-25 and 1-70, the mousetrap- if you 23 will, and draw a 35 -mile radius north, south, east and west, 24 north is the only place.leftto go. The northern 1-25- 25 corridor is ripe for growth and the small communities such as 225 l Dacono, Frederick, Firestone, Mead and Del Camino are acutely 2 aware of this tact. All these communities are seeing an 3 impact, of the economic rebirth in Colorado. Proposals such as 4 shopping malls, truck stops, hi -tech research and development, 5 industrial and residential projects have been investigated by 6 all of us. The northern 1-25 corridor has a tremendous 7 traffic flow. Studies by/Decker and -Associates, a developer 8 with which the City of Dacono is working, counted 43,000 cars 9 per day along this stretch of the highway. Ladies and 10 gentlemen, this traffic study was done prior to the Rockies 11 first pitch. Since the inception of major league baseball, 12 those numbers have increased to over 50,000, and quite frankly 13 with the resigning of Andres I think it _will go up. 14 These and other strong demographics make investment' 15: along this corridor appealing to a wide variety of commercial 16 interests. With the economic upswing in Colorado, our cities 17 and towns can target and choose what kind of development that 18 is sought for this area. I.go on record stating today that we 19 have neither targeted nor 'chosen; a prison on our economic: 20 agendas. The I-25 corridor,. is our bread and butter. It - 21 allows us to pursue a broad tax, base and shift. the tax burden 22 away from the residents. Projectsalong the 1-25 corridor are 23 happening every day. _ Community leaders - are seeking 24, development that will increase the tax base, not burden the 25 :,tax base in our communities._.:,.Cooperation between:the three: 226 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i communities of Dacono, Frederick and,Firestone, also known as 2 the Tri-Town; is at an all-time high. , We are pursing an 3 aggressive water and sewer project along the 1-25 'frontage 4 road beginning at Road 24, extending south to Highway 52 and 5 hopefully, continuing south to County Road 8. Ground was 6 recently broken for an alternative elementary school on Road 7 18. And soon, expansion of a local church will occur on Road 8- 20. The proposed prison facility is not compatible with these 9 projects. Quite -frankly, I cannot understand the logic of a 10 compatibility of a pre-school playground next to barbed wire 11 and eight to ten foot high fences. I ask you to look at this 12 picture here. We've all heard the coin; don't judge a book by 13 its cover. I ask you also not to judge this facility by its 14 landscape and its flowers. 15 This project is not compatible with future projects. 16 that are on our agendas. Our communities have been struggling 17 for so long to entice the right kind of developments. We are. 18 finally getting the food on our table, and now there are those 19 that want to poison it. Our communities have embraced the' 20 fact that times are Changing. Southwest Weld has a diverse`: 21 population of residents that is also changing. I resent the' 22 implication of -apathy associated•with this area. Apathy no - 23 longer characterizes the residents of southwest Weld.- We have, 24 joined together as a unified community to stop the"constant 25 undermining of this part'of the county. We have had many 227 1 1 noxious and obnoxious uses presented to us, ranging from 2 landfills, incinerators, infection wells and now even prisons; 3 We say enough is enough. As government officials,. -you walk a 4 delicate line trying to bring in new growth to our communities 5 without compromising the rural atmosphere and quality of life 6 that we cherish. This commission is my voice on -this issue 7 and this commission is the voice of many people ,in this room 8 on this issue. And as government officials, it is your 9 responsibility to listen to the people. As a fellow elected 10 official, I ask that you not lose sight of who you represent: 11 In closing, let me say that I -have sat on your side 12 of the podium and I know what, you're going through. And I, 13 don't relish your position. To some:on this Board, this is 14 the first true test of your political responsibilities since 15 being elected. Let this issue serve as a litmus test, a gauge, 16 by which those who have -elected you can see your true 17 political intentions. ;I ask that you not be swayed by various 18.. lobbying groups., I ask that you not be swayed by the 19 positions you hold on various committees. I ask that you 20.. listen to your :Constituents. Make us believe that our: 21. opinions count and our voices will. be heard. I ask, that you 22 not ignore the voice•of the Tri-Town Planning Commission which 23 voted unanimously for denial of thi—a project. Z -ask that you, 24, not ignorethe voice of the_Weld County Planning Commission 25 which also recommended denial --of this proposal. And I ask' 228 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 11 Roberts and then June Gordon. 4 of Weld County. The fact is you represent me. The fact is 1 that you not ignore my voice nor the voices 2 There have been many facts presented here today and you are 3 being asked to vote on the facts. The fact is I am a resident 5 you represent a majority of the people in this room. And the 6 fact is that the majority of people in this room 7 overwhelmingly oppose this project. It is these facts and 8 these facts alone that should be the ones that you are basing 9 your decision on. Thank you. 10 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Are there any questions., Al in this room. 12 MR. ROBERTS: My name is Al Roberts. I live at 3494 13 Fairways Drive and I'm approximately 7 miles north of the 14 proposed facility. I feel privileged to be following this 15 lady who just spoke. She has presented my opposition and my 16 feelings towards this very well, so I will not repeat anything 17 that has been said. I ask you as my elected representatives 18 to vote no on this proposed facility. Thank you. 19 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Any questions? June Gordon and 20 then Virginia Scheel. 21 MS. GORDON: My name is June Gordon. I live at 5602 22- Southmoor Lane in Englewood, Colorado. i have been tracking 23 the Criminal Justice Commission and pre -parole facilities for 24 7 years. It has been a law: for 4 years. The other 3 years, 25 we spent at the legislature, my friends and myself, as unpaid 229 1 citizens caring about our community. We spent dawn there 2 trying to kill the Criminal Justice Commission and trying not 3 to have a pre -parole facility. There's something that I 4 believe that each andevery one of us in this room have in 5 common and that is that we would hope that when people break 6 the law, become felons and go into prison, that they come out 7 better than they went in. Rehabilitation, if it exists and I 8 don't know where it does, should be done behind bars, not in 9 our communities. One of the most asked questions that.I have 10 heard is where do the clients for pre -parole come from. The' 11 most asked question, and I. haven't heard it answered yet, not; 12 totally. You have before you some. information that I sent to 13 you and it's five K's, KKKKK in your booklets. And one of the 14 things is a copy of House Bill 1212.. And one of the other 15 things that you have is some of the original language, keeping 16 in mind that I've been tracking pre -parole now since it was 17 even just a thought in someone's mind. 18 In this. Bill, House Bill 1212, this is an omnibus 19 bill and most of it came .out of, the Criminal Justice 20 Commission. The Criminal Justice Commission wasa law that 21 was, made by the legislators in 1.990 and it was the majority of 22, votes on the commission appointed by Governor Roy Romer. So_, 23 the agenda of the commission is Roy Romer,'s. And .the agenda„ 24: is a cap on prisons. There are ,six bed -emptying, -,levers in 25 this bill, and the most important and_the most lucrative is 230 1 1 1. 1 1 1 i 1 e 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 pre -parole. And so far, it's the only one that can't:get on 2 line. And that's the reason that the prisons are_backing up� 3 The other five bed -emptying levers have been` utilized and most 4 of them are expansion, enormous expansions of community 5 sanctions. And when that happens, when you 6 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Talk about just this pre -parole 7 center because that's whatwe're talking about is this one and 8 not what the state wants to happen or what they've -passed 9 because it's been passed and we-havevno jurisdiction over 10 that. So will you stick with this pre -parole facilityin this 11 place. 12 MS.-GORDON:-In'order for me to stick to the pre - 13 parole facility I must answer-the=.question, where_ do the 14 clients for pre -parole come _from. In order to answer that 15 question I have to continue with what I was saying:, Madam 16 Chairman. Is that okay? 17 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Well, I .think -we can ask the 18 applicant at the end of this where they're coming. I'll make 19 _a note of that -to ask.that question. 20 MS..CORDON: I'm sorry, I didn't hear you. 21 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: :We will -ask the applicant. If 22 -- you want that question answered, wewill ask theapplicantat 23 the end -of this. 24-%-- MS. GORDON: The applicant answered the question and 25`: he answered it, as far as I'm concerned, for all the studies 231 1 3 4 you've got it. 'Well if.you get.to the description of the type 5 of clientele that are there, 6. MS. GORDON: I'm trying. 7 MR. MORRISON: I --think that's, well,' it's>a long 8 road. 9 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Your comments need to be relevant 10 to this pre -parole prison in thisplace. 11 MS. GORDON: Okay, when an enormous_ number of 12 people, because of the expansion of community sanctions, are.: 13 diverted from the courts the people who get into the hard beds:. 14 in prison are..much more hard-core, much more dangerous and 15 more repeat offenders. So.'the:<population ofthe prisons, 16 since 1990, has changed. Ninety-five percent of everybody in' 17 the. prison are plea. bargained,: so who is violent and who is: 18 non-violent is hard to tell. _'The:people that would have gone:: 19 in on Class 6's and Class 5 felonies..have been diverted.to the 20 community. The people who cannot get -through a community 21 correction screening board are the most dangerous segment of'. 22 ' the population in CanonCity:that there is.. And these are the.: 23 people that they want to put through this facility. And it's 24 90 to 120 days before parole ,,eligibility. We have 25., jurisdiction over.goodtime in the .State of Colorado, you can 1 that I've done, it's not true..: I'm.about to tellyou where 2 . they really come from. MR..MORRISON: .That -and. -the five other systems, if 232 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 keep them in years and years and years. You also have, I get 2 this every single month, this-is.parole-eligible people. The 3 way I used to get it four years ago, there were 250 people on 4 this list. Now it's between 500 and 700 people. They 5 released, with the guidelines theyhad, approximately 40%. 6 That leaves 60% of the people in the prison_population that 7 cannot, that have been refused parole, and of that -60%, many, 8 many, many of them cannot get into community corrections. 9 Now, you have the part of the population that are eligible for 10 pre -parole. And in order to get more than 40% paroled, more. 11 than 40% parole dates, they have in this bill that.I have. 12 given you, that you have before you, 3-1/2 pages of softened 13 guidelines. The day that that.facility gets on-line, that 14 pre -parole facility, these guidelines kick in and the 15 percentage goes from 40% to 65% parole dates. Meanwhile, you 16 have that huge segment in the prison that are also eligible 17 for pre -parole. That's where -the people come from. They are 18 the most dangerous people in the system. They have been 19 refused parole, they are before their parole dates and every 20 effort shall be made to put them into; community corrections 21 and if they_ can't get through a community corrections_ 22 screening board, watch out because they have rapists and they'. 23 have murderers, they have armed robbers. Some day -you ought.. 24 to go to some of,these these halfway houses- that they have, the 25 community correction facilities:and see.who can get through a 233 1 1 board, and try to remember who can't. 2 And not only that, but four years ago the population of 3 the prisons of -the population percentage was one in four were 4 sex offenders in the hard beds in the State of Colorado. One 5 in four were sex offenders four years ago. With the 6 diversions, that number is much higher; it's higher than 25%. 7 The violent people are an enormous section of the population 8 and 95% of them are -pled down, we don't know how many are 9 really dangerous. And this facility is not just dangerous to 10 Weld County, it isn't just dangerous to Del Camino. It is 11- Adangerous to the whole State of Colorado. It is the singular 12 lever that is going to empty the beds in Canon City and it's 13 - going to put a cap on the prisons. And whenthe question was 14 asked by Ms. Barbara Kirkmeyer, when Barbara Kirkmeyer asked 15 the question, is there any way that you can guarantee us a 90- 16 day program, the answer, it wasn't answered at all. It was 17- danced around. And the reason, of course is, that number one 18 they have no contract, and number two when you have that 19 population, that 60% that's been turneddown that's in Canon 20 City, and somebody here.said•it was going to be 1,600 or 1,800- 21 -people that are going to be going through this community,: 22 forget it. That's the tip of the -iceberg.. If they ever get 23 started, you're going to have -•people in there for two days, 24 - -one day. .You think that's expensive? What's expensive is 25 building prisons. That's -what they -think -is_ -expensive, and 234 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 keeping people in prison is expensive. Not putting them into 2 that facility for two days and then shipping them out to 3 Denver or Del Camino if that happens to be where they live, or 4 Greeley, if that happens to be where they live. Thank you. 5 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Are there any questions for Ms. 6 Gordon? We will have Virginia Scheel and then M.D. Hopper. 7 Is M.D. Hopper in the audience? 8 MS. SCHEEL: Good evening. I am Virginia Scheel 9 and I live at 2331 C Street NW. I'm a Weld County resident. 10 I'd like to bring to you some facts tonight on pre -parole. 11 You see with crime on the rise in Colorado and our nation, we 12 meet here today to decide on a pre -parole facility. A 13 facility to early release hard-core, long-term criminals who 14 cannot get through a community corrections screening board, 15 have regressed from community corrections, or parole 16 violators. This is what pre -parole is. The House Bill is 17 where I got this information from. Pre -parole does not fit 18 the PUD for Del Camino. When pre -parole releases, with crime 19 increasing faster than law enforcement officers can solve the 20 crimes, pre -parole wants to dump more problems out on our 21 streets. With a return rate of 85-90% which was statedin the. 22 Greeley Tribune, a parolee's going back to the prison system 23 for the same crimes they were_released,for. It's, time to stop 24 all this crime and violence and it begins here today with you, 25_ our County Commissioners. We are not hysterical or emotional 235 1 1 citizens who are here today. We are here today with facts. 2 We are not naive about pre -parole. 3 If this facility could be 100% safe, it's the felons 4 who will be released through pre -parole that we are concerned 5 about. I could probably talk for a long time because I have 6 so much information, but I will cut it short. I have been 7 gathering facts and information since July of '92 when I first 8 found out that pre -parole may be wanting to establish on 0 9 Street. I hope to bring to you some facts today to help you 10 make a decision for denial of the facility. 11 The applicants have spoke at the Planning and Zoning 12 meeting about the success of pre -parole in Texas. It wasn't 13 talked about today. I would like to tell you a little bit 14 about Texas pre -parole. Texas, unfortunately, has four pre- 15 parole facilities: Venus, with a population of 414 people; 16 Kyle with 1,629; Bridgeport with 3,614 people and; Cleveland, 17 the largest city with 5,600, give or take a few in all of 18 these cities. They were dying oil towns when they lost their 19 oil resources. Pre -parole was their only means. I would like 20 to share with you today some very alarming facts. In 1992, 21 Texas paroled 67 death -row inmates. Yes, I said 67 death -row 22 inmates. As of April 28, 1993, two of these death -row inmates 23 were still missing. They don't know of their whereabouts. 24 There are 6,000 fugitives in Houston alone; 26,000 fugitives 25 throughout the State of Texas, all are felons, many very 236 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r 1 1 1 1 1 dangerous felons who have walked away from parole officers. 2 Each officer is assigned 80 parolees to watch. They cannot 3 keep track of all of them. Texas releases 70 parolees every 4 day. Police officers cannot handle the load. The people are 5 outraged about this. They have formeda volunteer squad 6 called the Zebra Squad to help fight the rising crime. 7 Kenneth Allen McDuff, one of Texas' most notorious criminals, 8 who is extremely vicious and was sentenced to die, was paroled 9, despite public outcry. He kidnapped, raped a 15 -year old 10 girl, killed her and, two teenaged boys in Rosebud, Texas. He 11 was paroled in 1989. Seven months later, paroled, you guessed 12 it, he went back after more teenagers, he went back to prison. 13 Released again in two months. He is now back in prison for 14 the same crime. My point is rehabilitation in prison doesn't. 15 work. Parole.doesn't work. Don't we, as citizens, have any 16 rights to be protected from felons who are being paroled? Do 17 we want this in Colorado?. The applicant was speaking about 18 the pre 19 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: We, have no jurisdiction over 20 whether people are paroled or not. I mean, I realize that 21 probably there's many that shouldn't or should or what have, 22 you, but we don't have any jurisdiction over that... So_ we need, 23 to stick with this parole facility at this site. 24 MS. SCHEEL: But pre -parole is releasing. .This is. 25 what I'm getting at. I'm speakinghere today, not in favor of 237 1 it. When speaking about the pre -parole facility, emphasis had 2- been put on the landscaping and structure of the building and 3 has stated that it will have a school -house look. It is not 4 the landscaping and school -house look we are concerned about. 5 Our main concern is the type of inmates that will be housed 6 there and released from there. 7 House Bill 90, 1327, page 11, I think probably you 8 have one, Section 17, I'll leave all that, tells us of the 9 type of inmates. Would you like me to read what it tells the 10 type of inmates that will be -going in there? 11 CHAIRMAN-HARBERT: I think we have a copy of that' 12 and all of us have read it. 13 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: Here's three of them. 14 MS. SCHEEL-: You've read it. All right. Well, I do 15 not consider these types of inmates that are stated in this 16: House Bill to be minimum security. Safety is our number one 17 concern. 18 facility. 19 20 21 One life lost to a parolee is not worth this Escape is a concern that our own Weld County Jail, supposedly escape -proof, has had escapes. Our main concern is when the inmates are released to live in our towns, work and - possibly attend our educational facilities for more job 22 training. House Bill 1327, on page -5. states in the process of 23 enrolling in and maintaining academic -courses and'vocational 24- programsandin utilizing resources --of the community after- 25 'release. We could have these felons attending Aims -and UNC.- 238 I 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 There is no such facility down at Del. Camino. Do you want 2 your sons and daughters in the same. classrooms? 3 It's not safe to go into a donut shop in Colorado, 4 here. A parolee tried to kill this -young woman, not once but 5 twice. We've all read about it, it just happened recently. 6 On September 12, 1993, the Greeley Tribune ran an article 7 where Senator Phil Panke that said the prison program is 8 having a return rate of inmates after parole of 85-90% and the 9 inmates released who have not been back are 65 years or older. 10 Pre -parole's purposeis to release inmates, drop our 11 overcrowding in the Colorado prisons. With 85-90% returning, 12 this is not emptying beds. Pre -parole is nothing but a 13 revolving door facility. 14 COMMISSIONER BAXTER: I'd like to ask a question. 15 I was, I guess trying to -put this together what you're saying 16-_ here, how this possibly, whether or not this particular pre 17, parole facility was approved, and: you stories are, I agree 18 they're horrendous. But how would that affect those, I mean. 19 those- people were paroled. The fact of whether this is 20 constructed or not doesn't have any bearing on whether they're 21 paroled or not.. Or this won't change the parole practices in 22 the State of Colorado. 23 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: That's what I'm trying to, no, it. 24 won't. And you also mentioned that -they would be attending 25 classes. This is a secure facility,' if they attend classes, 239 1 e 1 it will be within the walls from what I'understand. So it 2 wouldn't be that they would` be -attending Aims or going to 3 donut shops in the area. 4 MS. SCHEEL: I said they could. The House Bill 5 states that.they could attend. classes after release from the 6 facility. That's what Isaid. After release, for more job 7 training. 8 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: But, they would be released to 9 their own community, not to the Del Camino or necessarily the 10 - Weld County area. It depends on where they come from. All 11. prisoners are released to their own community, from where the 12 crime was committed. 13 MS. SCHEEL: I know that,. but the applicant lives 14 here in Greeley, so he's not going to go all over the State of 15 Colorado to get them in different educational facilities. You 16 Weld County Commissioners are about to vote today on a very 17 adverse issue. Please_take.into consideration the facts of 18 the concerned citizens who you are representing. Your: 19 decision should be for the majority of the Weld County. 20- citizens, keeping in mind a state contract has not yet been' 21 issued. Without knowing what is in the contract, how can 22 anyone vote on such a vital issue? We are asking for you to; 23 deny this facility, 24 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Axe there any questions.for Ms. 25 Scheel? M.D. Hopper and then.EAthy Oliver, are you in the 240 1 1 1 I I 1 audience? ' 2 MR. HOPPER: I'm Marvin Hopper. I live at 3656 Weld ' 3 County Road 20-1/2. That is just a mile south of the Del 4 Camino on the west service road. I have a concern about the, 5 not about the inmates or the facility. My concernisthe 6 visitors to the inmates on visiting day. If we've got 400 1 7 beds in there, and if you- have half of the visitors coming ' 8 that day, you've got say 200 visitors, the areaisnot 9 conducive to that much traffic at this point. What I have 10 here for the .school. district, -I-went to St. Vrain School 11 District. The superintendent had asked that I use only the 12 facts of which I give, I' mean' he has given me. - Over 100 13 children pass through that intersection daily for school bus. 14 - And these are anywhere fromgradeschool up -through the ' 15 seniors. And most of them are dropped off in this area. And 16 approximately 1,800 activity busses, which is like football, 17 basketball, wrestling, pass through this intersection. The 18 only ones that don't.pass through there are the ones that go ' 19 to Boulder. - Everything else, even if they go to Ft. Collins, ' 20 they come out, get on the interstate and go north in order to_ 21 bypass Highway 287 through the towns of Berthoud, Loveland and 22 that area. And then on the return, it's always a good place 23 to stop, grab you.a hamburger 'Sometimes you'll have an extra: 24 100 kids off at what I calltheBig Three: McDonalds,`Burger- ' 25 King and Taco Bell.. And as we1l,=there are nearly as many I 241 1 visiting teams coming to town and they had come through the 2 same access point. On their return they stop. And it's the 3 friends that are up there visiting, the only reason they're 4 not in is cause they didn't get caught. So the friends are in 5 : the neighborhood and it's not.a conducive atmosphere. 6 I don't know whether you've been down there at that 7 intersection. We spend, we'll walk down there just to have an 8 ice cream cone sometimes. -But that, the Big Three, McDonalds, 9 Burger King, is becoming.a very populated place for ahangout. 10 Also last night I called the Burger King. I talked to the 11 night manager... It was about-,9:00.last night. And I talked to 12 Taco Bell night manager and I -talked to McDonalds' night 13 manager. And I told them what I was looking at was for the 14 teenagers that work there. - And at. McDonalds they: have 12 to 15 15 teenagers workon the night shift, and they usually get off 16 . about 11:00. At Burger King, there's 9 to 10 per night shift. 17 And at Taco Bell there's 8 to 12 per night shift. And this is 18 what is my concern. for the area. The .people who will be 19 coming visiting and all thispopulation of the teenagers in 20 the area. That's It. Thank you. 21 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Are there any questions, for Mr:7 22 Hopper? 23- COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER:.. I'd.just makethe statement 24 - that I don't think its fair to put. that kind of a stigma on: 25 . people who -go visit inmates._ I mean, personally, I_myselfT 242 1 I 1 I I 1 have gone and visited an inmateand I don't think I'm a bad 2 person to be around. 3 MR. HOPPER: Well, as you'll notice, I put in here, 4 the buddies, not family, not members of the family. 5 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: Could you tell me, where in 6 here, where is the visitation? Do you know what the 7 visitation is at the site? 8 MR. HOPPER: It was stated earlier today that it 9 would be on Saturdays. 10 COMMISSIONER WEBSTER: I missed that. 11 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: On Saturdays only, or 12 MR. HOPPER: - That's the only date that I. heard 13 today. 14 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Kathy Oliver and then Chris . 15 Wagner. Is Chris Wagner in the -audience? 16 MS. OLIVER: My name is Kathy Oliver. I live at 17 4465 Pioneer Drive in Greeley. My sister and I own 3/4 18 sections that are a mile and a half west of the proposed site. 19 I'm here to statemy opposition to this proposal and I've 20 deleted quite a bit of what I would have said because it's 21 already been covered. 22 I oppose this proposal for basically two reasons,':: 23 the first being that it'sa violation of -citizens' right to 24 due "process -of law, -the second -being -that on your green sheet" 25 here, item number 3, it'states that the uses, buildings and - 243 1 structures :which would be permitted shall be compatible with 2 the existing or future development of the surrounding area as 3 permitted by the existing zoning andwith the future 4 development as projected by the Comprehensive Plan or Master 5 Plans of affected municipalities. 6 This proposal is incompatible with existing and 7 future development. It should be, built where land .is not 8 likely to come to a higher or better use. Let's look at this 9 one particular fact. Perception is a fact. When I say Canon 10 City, what do you.think? The pre -parole prison is proposed at 11 a high -profile site designed to dominate the image and 12 identity of the Del Camino area. The Del Camino image, thus 13 created, conflicts with development already existing. in the 14 area as well' as future development.. The Greeley Tribune 15 repeatedly refers to Del Camino as a prime growth area in Weld 16 County. This proposed use is incompatible. with that fact. Is 17 it appropriate to foster the location of a pre -parole prison 18 at, the primary gateway to such a_growth area? I find myself 19 pondering questions that perhaps we should consider. Why does 20 The Villa seek.such a high profile site adjacent to I-25, when 21 other equally effective locations can be had even within the 22 same sewer district and equally adjacent to services? Why did 23 The Villa repeatedly state that_they-would not go where the 24 citizens do not_ want the pre -parole .prison?. What other • 25 statements have The Villa made that they are preparing_to take 244 I I 1 I 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 back? 2 I wonder why the-citizensof Weld County should have 3 to accept pre -parolees not acceptable in community pre -parole 4 facilities? Why' should well-to-do, affluent, urban 5 individuals control the quality of life of decent property - 6 owning tax -paying rural citizens? Are Weld County people 7 outside the Greeley/Evans-area to be treated as second class 8 citizens destined to 'shoulder the burden of failure in 9 Greeley, Denver, or wherever else in our state? And even yet, 10 without due process of -law?' The Villa needs to accept the 11 invitation of one of'the.communities Mr. Coppom told us about 12 today. Mr.-Coppom, in his statement this morning, said he has 13 received several such --invitations. Since there -are other 14 sizes seeking thi's-facility, I urge The'Villa to locate on one 15 of those sites. Thank you. Are there questions? 16 COMMISSIONER HALL: Could you -explain to me what 17 you're saying when you're saying when you're saying due 18 process of law? 19' MS. OLIVER: When I say that the proposal is without 20 due process of law, -it's because the PUD does not - state this. 21 use. So what really needs to happen is they need to go back - 22' and amend the PUD. By going this route, it disenfranchises 23 all the citizens of that area. 24 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: You made the statement 25 about other' locations in this area'are in the same sanitation - 245 1 district? 2 MS. OLIVER: Right. 3 COMMISSIONER KIRK MEYER: Where would those;be? 4 MS. OLIVER: This particular site was offered by Bob 5 - Siegrist who was told that it was not high 6profile'enough. COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: It would still be in close proximity to all the blue areas; however 8 MS. OLIVER:- It's not predominant, it's not so 9 . visible, it's not so controlling to the image of the:Area. 10 MR. MORRISON: The party is indicating Lot: 027 on 11 Exhibit 6F. It's parcel number 027 in the southeast quadrant. 12 COMMISSIONER BAXTER: I understand 13 ' would be that these same.people contention people who represent in this area 14 would not be opposed if it was over there, and they are 15 opposed if it's over here. Is that, really what you're saying?- 16 MS. OLIVER: I don't know that that would relieve 17 anyone. I don't know if that. would relieve all of the 18 opposition, but my point is that 19the location, on a high profile site, adjacent to 1-25 is very dominating. It creates 20 an image that, I think would be 21 pretty hard to defeat. CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Are there any other questions for 22 - Ms. Oliver? Thank you. Chris Wagner and then Larry Abbott, 23 Is Larry Abbott in the audience? Larry Abbott. 24 MR. WAGNER:. Good evening.,' is Chris Wagner. 25 My address is 4652 Weld County Road 28 Longmont. My house is 246 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 i 1 I 1 1 e 1 approximately one mile straight north of this proposed site. 2 I farm on two sides of this.proposed site. On the north side 3 there's pasture that I've putcattle on. On this very east 4 side of this, their property line, I farm that 140 acres for 5 corn. I'd just like to tell, you that even though the 6 landlords aren't here, and they took a neutral position, I 7 take 100% opposition to this facility being built there. I 8 also would like to tell you thatI was born and raised a mile 9 from this facility, 34 years now, so that's. just some of my 10 background. Thank you. 11 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Thank you, Chris. Are there any 12 questions for Mr. Wagner? Okay, Larry Abbott and then Doris. 13 Huffaker. Is Doris Huffaker in the audience? 14 MR. ABBOTT: My name is Larry Abbott. I live at.. 15 5825 Weld County Road Number 22.. I'm approximately 2 miles: 16 from the facility, proposed facility. 17 What I wish to address is.:I am for the growth of the 18 corridor. I think by the fact that they're putting that type 19 of facility and that's too valuable real estate, that's too - 20 good of real estate for that. That corridor should be used. 21 for good retail or a factory, something that produces: 22 paychecks and sales tax and all the things that go with that.: 23 What concerns .me is the fact that since there is no other. 24 commercial development in that quarter section, that the first 25 unit that goes in there is going to set the pace for future. 247 1 development that's nearby. I don't think that the facility, 2 pre -parole facility is the right kind of facility.- I think we 3 - :need to look long and Shard, especially at this point in time when real estate values are up, we've got a volatile market 5 where people are looking at this land. I'm sure they are 6 looking at this landhere in other places. So..that's what I 7 would charge you Commissioners with.. looking long and hard at 8 this because the impact is forever. 9 - And one -of my other major concerns is that these 10 people are going through an awful lot of time and expense for 11 a 386 -bed facility: That concerns' me. What concerns me more 12 - than 386 beds is what their future plans are, their future 13 growth. Because if they_ever get -established there and they 14 wish to expand, you can't ten. them no.. If they're a viable 15 industry, no matter what impact they cause on the area, if 16 they're there it's going to be awfully hard for youtotell 17 them no, you can't expand. And that's what I see, is 18 expansion. They have signed up to use something like 22 acres 19 of- this proposed 55 acres or something like that. I'm 20 concerned what they have planned for the balance of that land 21 and .1.haven't heard that.: Thank -you, that's all I have to:: 22 say. Any questions? 23 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Areathere any questions:for Mr. 24 Abbott? .Okay,.Doris-Huffaker.- I::believe you're -the -last one: 25' to speak, 248 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 MS. HUFFAKER: My name is DorisHuffaker and we live 2 at 11096 Road 17, Longmont, and the,southend of our property 3 is on Weld County Road 24. So you must realize that I will be facing driving past, back and forththis facility twice a day, 5 every day as I work in Longmont,and it is between me and 6 Longmont to get there.. I think what you need to realize is 7 that when my husband and I first bought this property, it's 8 going on 30 years now, we had moved out here from Los Angeles 9 and we had left all those people behind because we had both 10 been raised in agricultural areas. And we knew that becoming 11 married and being ready to, establish a family, we did not with 12-- to raise them in an area such as Los Angeles, a large populous 13 area. We moved to Denverandwe looked for one year to find 14 the perfect land.. We - had -our choice. We could choose 15 anything. I must tell you, had.there been a pre -parole prison 16 facility there, we would not have,bought there. We had a 17 choice at that time. Now they are attempting to take our 18 choice away. They wish to say we're going to come there 19 whether you want us or not. We..don't want them. We lived 20 there and we raised our four children. There were a lot of 21 activities, around there that was great for the kids. They 22 _ played baseball, they built baseball diamonds, they fished for 23 crawdads, I had 18 years. of Cub. Scout and Campfire Girl work' 24 that I put into .there. and it was a good place to raise 25 . children. I ;cannot say that it,will be-a.good.place . if you 249 1 get a prison parole in there. 2 I also must -tell you that I have to be accused of 3 being against growth. I would rather see it as it was 30 4 years ago. We had achoice also of purchasing some property 5 right off of Weld County, no it's right on the borderline, 6 Highway 7. And we thought, no, that will grow too fast, we'll 7 go farther north, it won't grow as -fast. And Del Camino has 8 outgrown everything. We sure chose wrong. I thought maybe I- 9 25 would keep the growth west of -I-25. It's not doing that, 10 -it's now jumped east. So we are, and I don't care what our 11 - land values go to, I don't wish to -see them -escalate, but I 12 don't wish to see -them -de-escalate also. I don't want -to make 13' a million dollars'. I just want to live peacefully. I want to- 14 live In an area that's nice and quiet where I've planted all 15 my trees and I've -gardened and I've really made this place 16 grow. In another couple years, my husband and I are talking 17 about retiring. If this goes in, -we will not retire there, - 18 ` and that was our idea: We are building this place, we are - 19 -setting it up` to retire in. But it won't be there if 'it goes 20 in. We will be gone. 21 The next thing I ask you''is, in the few years past, 22 the Weld County Commissioners passed a law here and -it was -- 23-- that no longer would they allow-allthis haphazard building in - 24 ' - the County of Weld County -because -it -was -considered one -of the 25 four largest agricultural counties in -the -United States. This - 250 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 was their money and they wished to keep it as such; so all 2 building was to be kept within the inhabited areas. You guys 3 sure' messed up at Del Camino. ':It is a mess. I mean, that 4 place has gone crazy with eateries and gas stations and 5 everything else. As I say, when we first went there, there 6 was one gas station and one restaurant. And that was all they 7 needed. You're not keeping to what you were trying for in the 8 agricultural community. In your seal you have, over half of 9 it shows agricultural emblems and -you are not doing that when 10 you keep allowing anything to go in there. I've not fought 11 any of the other growth and I won't, even though it's travel 12 trailers and everything else that has nothing to do with 13 agriculture,"but when it comes - to -'a pre -parole or a prison or, 14 a detention, no matter what along those lines, it's totally 15 incompatible. And I vote -no on it. -Thank you. 16 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Any --questions? 17 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER First of all, I can't speak 18 for the actions of past or previous Commissioners, and second 19 -of all I'd like -to know if you could reference the law you 20 spoke about because I' -don't know where that's at. - - 21 - MS. HUFFAKER: -It was a thing they passed, it's been 22 10, 15 years ago that if you were'going-to build on a piece o. 23 property, you had to have 80 acres•of irrigated -land -to get a 24 ' building permit for; or if it were unirrigated land, -it had to 25 be 160 acres or to get your -building permit, you had to be, is 251 1 that. not correct, you had to be:in an inhabited area. And 2 since there were, 30 some:inhabited areas, those were where 3 they were going to try to keep the.building. Because there 4 were too many farmers who thought, -well I can make some money 5 here, I'll subdivide my farm and make this money and leave. 6 And they were seeing all the farms. dying out. And -so this is 7 when it was passed. And it's:been 15 years or so ago. 8 .COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: I. don't know if that was 9 necessarily a law, but it basically: sounds like some of the 10- policies and goals that were developed in the weld County 11 Comprehensive Plan. - 1.2 MS. HUFFAKER: And is it not still a good policy? 13 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: Since, that time, -obviously, 14 see this is our Zoning Ordinance and there are other policies 15 and ordinances that we have to follow. 16 MR, MORRISON: I think 17 MS, HUFFAKER: I, think that 18- COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: ,Did you have a comment? 19: MR._ MORRISON: -I just wanted to, the fact that I'm 20 silent on this ,doesn't mean I agree with her interpretation of 21 the law. Some of that, if there's a mixture of, the Comp Plan 22 . policies and- the minimum, lot size requirements, -in the 23 agricultural zone but -none of those prohibit application for 24 development.., -It discouraged breaking;_lots up.over,35 acres 25 and:less.than 80,2or 160acres,,but 252 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 MS. HUFFAKER: And the intent was to keep it in 2 agricultural, Correct? 3 MR. MORRISON: Well, I think that's correct in terms 4 of that particular provision, but it's not an absolute 5 prohibition against creating a Planned Unit Development or 6 subdivision. Since then there have been amendments in the 7 Comprehensive Plan that have been discussed today that apply 8 specifically to the Del Camino area. 9 MS. HUFFAKER: Well, I have to tell you, I know from 10 a fact in dealing with Greeley, that what goes for Greeley is 11 one thing and what goes for Weld County is something 12 different. I do know of another law that was passed and that 13 was that they would not allow, now how did that go? They 14 would not allow another residence to be put upon the land 15 unless it was for a farming help. A trailer, that was it, a 16 mobile home to be put upon the land unless it was specifically 17 for farm help. We had people across the road from us who put 18 a mobile home. 19 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: I really don't think this is 20 relevant to 21 MS. HUFFAKER: No, but it goes back to‘ how you 22 people make these,' yeti make these stipulations'` and then you 23 don't keep them. 24 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Well, I think you have to realize 25 that, you know, at least every eight years the Board changes 253 i totally. It changes partially every 4 years usually. So, you 2 know, what a Board of Commissioners did 10, 15, 20 years ago, 3 may have been changed many times by the Commissioners that 4 have come after them. And if you would like to purchase one 5 of our Planning and 'Zoning Ordinances, they are available at 6 the Planning Department and so is the Comprehensive Plan and 7 the Subdivision Ordinance. And that would bring you up to 8 date as to what our policies, and procedures are today. 9 MS. HUFFAKER: And you're telling me you no longer 10 wish to pursue the agricultural part?._ 11 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: I'm not saying that. I'm just 12 saying that if you want to know what they are today, these 13 documents here will inform you of that. 14 MS. HUFFAKER: Well, as.I stated earlier, I can only 15 tell you that shoudn't go in. We bought it because it was, 16 agricultural and that was as it was. presented to us. We make 17 the choice that should it go in, and even if it doesn't go in 18 and Del Camino continues to expand as it has., itmay be enough 19 for us to leave, if it continues.growing. Because that was 20 not why we moved out there. My other thing is since this is 21 liked so, well by these people, as others,have said, why don't 22 they take it to those-cities,or bring it uphere to. Greeley, 23 right where there's so much talent or it's so close to them. 24 Whydoesn't it come up here? 25 . COMMISSIONER BAXTER: . I'd -just like to interrupt for 1 1 1 1 1 Y 1 254 i 1 1 1 e 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 we're looking at now. We're not really looking at 10 agricultural areas, we're looking at a PUD. 11 MS. FIUFFAICER:- That'is correct and as I did say, I 12 knew those were going:in and we did not fight those as we have 13 been fighting this because this is totally, it's like 180 14 degrees opposite of what we're looking'for. The others, we 15 can live with, even though -they came and we didn't -wish them. 16 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: I will say that none of these 17 policy changes or ordinances were made without public hearing. 18 So they were published and public hearings were held on each 19 one of them. 2CV MS. HUFFAIC£R: Probably out of the Greeley paper and 21 - there's a lot of those down there' that don't even -read the 22 Greeley paper. 23 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Right -now the`bid has gone to the 24 Windsor Beacon and 25 COMMISSIONER 'RIRICM£y n. :Before that it was the 1 a second here. I think more pertinent to the point is the 2 fact that the PUD was established by the Commissioners, the 3 committee at the time, and interested individuals in the 4 community. A PUD" for Del Camino was established that has all 5 these uses besides agriculture.- With the input of the people 6 there, there is industrial, there is commercial which this is, 7 and all those other uses were decided at that time by the 8 people with the input of live that community. So that's what 255 Keenesburg New ,News 2 MS. HUFFAKER: How about the Long mont paper? 3 Longmont and the Denver Post, maybe that goes statewide. 4 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: _If -they; bid on it, wellit_ had to 5 be bid on by Weld fiounty_papers_ 6 MS. HUFFAXER: See, that's what these people have 7_ been telling you __We in southeast get lost in everything 8 because - 9 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Well:, anybody that's interested 10 in county regulations as far as ordinances or legal notices is 11 notified in all the papers what.the:county paper will be for 12, that year and, it's taken by bid. And_so I'm sure the. Longmont 13 paper did advertise that the. Windsor Beacon this year would be 14 the official:paper of Weld County, Government. And it goes out: 15 for bid each, -year with other,. and, any, Weld County paper may 16 bid on it. 17 MS.-HUFFAKER: I'm sor ry,: _I -must have missed that 18 and I usually watch my newspaper very closely and I did not 19 see that. But I really don't follow too much what happens in - 20 Greeley. As -I said, when :had children that I was dealing,. 21 with,I came to Greeley all the time and I don't now. Thank 22 you. 23 .COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: ..Madam Chairman, just as a- 24 point of clarification, County Commissioners do--not.;-make nor 25, do we pass laws; it is our.responsibility•to.enact and enforce 256 1 1 1 1 1 1" legislation. 2 ,, CHAIRMAN HARBERT: I'll get the opinion of my fellow 3 Commissioners here, do you need to stretch or do you want to 4 hear the conclusion of the 5 C0MMISSI0NER'KIRKMEYER: Are you going ask if there 6 is anyone else who wants to speak? 7 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Well;'I guess. Is there anyone 8 else that wants to speak for or against? I think we've gone 9 through all the cards-'that"were signed up. I will ask if 10 there is anyone else. 11- MS. HOFMANN: Excuse me, for the record, 12 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: You'll have to come to the 13 microphone please, and I -believe you've' already spoken. 14 `MS. HOFMANN: Yes, -1 have. 15 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Are you going to speak on 16 anything new? 17 MS. HOFMANN: I'm going to clarify a point that was 18 brought up. It was stated 19 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Will you state your name, please. 20 MS. HOFMANN: My' name is Wendy Hofmann. I ama"" 21 resident and a council member in -the -City of Dacono. It was 22 stated prior that it was the belief f one of the speakers up: 23 here that Dacono has 24 -hour police protection. That has been. 24 reduced to a non -24 -hour -"police' protection and that has been 25 in place since the 1992 budget hash -been adopted. Basically it 257 was a budget cutback and I think that is something. that you, as Commissioners should 'realize, that: that is not a 24 -hour 3 police department. 4 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Thank you for that information. 5 Is there anyone else? All right, come forward, please. 6 MS. DePAIVA: I'm Paula..DePaiva from 34 James 7 Circle, Longmont. And I'don't walk in fear, except the fear 8- of the Lord. And all I'-ve heard in the favor of The Villa was 9 a material gain and:_a gain in wealth and power and man-made 10 chore. I never saw anybody turningto.God and_a-.curriculum 11 based on a relationship -with Jesus.Christ as the answer to_ 12 crime. Thank you. 13 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Is there anyone else? Would you 14 like to stretch for a. minute? (MULTIPLE COMMENTS] Art, if 15 you don't mind, we are going, to take about a 5 -minute break, 16 we'll make it real quick. 17 (A FIVE-MINUTE -BREAK WAS TAKEN)_ 18 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: We will reconvene. Let the 19 record show that all five Commissioners are present. Mr. Roy. 20 MR._ROY:-If you please, My name is Arthur Roy. I'm_ 21 . an. attorney. My office address is 1011 11th Avenue, Greeley, 22. Colorado. i have been:asked to represent the developer with - 23 . respect to this.. request and,: most particularly to,:address the" 24 legal issues -that have .been raised and, a few of the -factual 25 issues which are n dispute., 258 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 I'm going to refer to the letter of December 7, 2 1993, which I -believe is from. Mr. Dahl which is a, very close 3 to a previous letter, I think. you received and probably 4 reviewed in October. The first position, legal position taken 5 by the opponents of the project is that the Fort Junction Pun 6 District was abandoned. Let me first say, Mr. Dahl and myself 7 will make statements to you about the law, but I'm sure you'll 8 get your advice from the County, Attorney who is best able to 9 advise you concerning these matters and is your counsel. 10 Addressing his letter, however, Fort Junction PUD, as of June: 11 of 1993 was declared by your Planning Commission to be a valid 12 and subsisting PUD. There had been a gap of time of 13 approximately -three years with no activity with respect to the' 14 PUD in terms of review, as contemplated by the ordinances of 15 the county. My understanding is that the ordinances. have been 16 amended to accommodate by the three-year review instead of a 17 one-year review. But all of that 'aside, the Planning 18 Commission has reviewed the PUD and, as of June of 1993, has 19 declared it current pursuant to your own ordinances. 20 The balance of Mr.'Dahl's argument really turns on 21 one issue. That is, must the word "prison" or other .similar. 22 term, appear in the uses permitted in C-1, C-2, C-3.,: C-4 and 23 I-1? I respectfully submit it does not, and - I - think the - 24' entire Comprehensive Plan and ordinances of the county -support 25- that argument. First of "all, the argument ignores the. 259 1 l provision of the Zoning Ordinance, 5..10. It was mentioned 2 earlier. 5.10 saysthat the uses listed. are representative 3 and are not inclusive. That means to say, that means that the 4 "list" is not an exclusionary list, but is an example list and 5 uses that are similar to and have similar impact, and have 6 similar appearance, -whatever, as listed uses, are. included. T Now, to bolster, the center of his:. argument centers on the 8 - resolution of March 8,1989, where,then commissioners said 9 uses as listed in the. Weld County;Zoning Ordinance.. And that 10. language is given high meaning by:Mt. Dahl. 11 I _ would, submit -to you_ that, and the two 12 Commissioners who signed this Resolution sit, still,: on the,. 13 : Commission,. that the words:. -'uses permitted' in those zones 14 could equally have been substituted in terms of what they. 15 intended. I think Mr. Dahl and I would both agree that all of 16 the rules that deal with how-to interpret this resolution or 17 the Zoning Ordinance, the base rule is we must find the intent. 18 of the body who adopted the language. -I submit that "uses as 19 listed" which he wishes :to have:you'costrue very narrowly, - 20 was not intended to be,narrowly construed and certainly was' 21 not intended to exclude the meaning of Section ,5.10 of the, 22. . Zoning Ordinance. And how do I draw:that conclusion?. I draw. 23 that'conclusion because this property is in a Mixed Use, I' 24:. want to get the terms: correct, .a Mixed Use Development 25r_ District. It is also ;a:,Planned Unit Development and a PUD: 260 1 1 1 1 r 1 1 1 1 1 Overlay District, all of which'; if -you read the. purposes and 2 guidelines for those districts is to provide flexibility in 3 planning and zoning -in the areas in which those districts 4 exist. The I-25 corridor -will develop and it will develop 5 with commercial and industrial facilities adjacent -'to the 6 highway. This facility is compatible with those uses and this 7 facility is compatible with the uses contemplated in C-1 8 through C-4 and I-1; therefore, is permitted without an 9 amendment to the Zoning Ordinance, or without an amendment to 10 the underlying PUD District. 11 The balance of his argument, and I don't want to 12 address each issue necessarily, is that they're being -denied 13 some sort of due process by virtue of -the fact that we are now - 14 filing the final plat when they believe the matter should be- 15 re -zoned. I have listened to testimony all day. I know very 16 little that could be brought up that would not be brought up 17in- a rezoning matter. All' of the issues' relevant to the- 18 rezoning of this property have been -discussed: It's not a- 19 rezoning procedure, but the same issues are addressed by you. 20 And what are' those issues? -The issue is compatibility with- 21. the PUD and compatibility with the surrounding land: And that, 22 has been discussed ad nauseam -by -everyone The' surrounding 23 land is agricultural.' The land" immediately north is --a gravel 24` pit owned by the county. 'The land immediately to the- 25 northeast is a' state park. " The 'land to -the southwest is a- 261 1 Commercial District, and -,the land to the south and; east is 2 agricultural.., All of that_land is in and near a developing 3 part of the -county, namely,the 1-25 corridor. The -uses will 4 change in that corridor over the next few years and those uses 5 will be compatible with this development and this development 6 is compatible. with the existinguses.- 7 .;Now., you've seen the.developments in Ft. Collins, 8 you've seen the developments -.in Boulder and you've seen where 9 these, facilities have gone•in and :you've seen the kind of 10 development that occurs around them:after they go in. That 11 development is exactly the development that is going to occur 12 on 1-25. And this facility is, if anything, safer than the. 13 facilities. that were built in Boulder and Ft. Collins. And 14 why do I say safer? County_ jails are maximum security 15 facilities-and.in our, case -we have maximum and medium. security 16,. facilities. Prisoners are brought in there all times, day and 17 night for all kinds of crimes, with all kinds.ofproblems and 18 they are transported in and out of that facility regularly, 19 , either by vehicle or otherwise. .They face. the possibility of 20 extended incarceration, many •of .them do. Those that are 21 charged with, felonies face the._posslbility or probability of 22 a, long incarceration. .This facility -involves people arriving• 23 . ,once, leaving _once, Arriving after perhaps a_ relatively - 24 lengthy incarceration, on the brink of -being released, not on 25 the -brink of;being.incarcerated, and, they will, be there for a 1 262 1 1 I 1 1 1 relatively short period of time --.90 days to 120 days is a 2 relativelyshort period of time. -That's the last person 3 that's likely to be a risk,: the last person that's likely to 4 break out. And when they are, in fact,. released they will not 5 be released to this community,, they willbe released to their 6 residential community. The facility is safe. It's compatible 7 with surrounding- land use and: -according to all of the 8 objective evidence, will have no: negative impact on land 9 ; values. The opposition, the gentleman who's a realtor from 10 Longmont and runs. Prudential Real Estate Agency, rendered the: 11 opinion that property values might.: go down.. He is a real, 12 estate person, apparently knowledgeable in the field and is. 13 entitled to form that kind of an opinion. -Laymen probably are_ 14not entitled to form that, kind of an opinion although they: 15 feel that very desperately_and-very sincerely. The -problem: 16 is, he didn't give you one example to bolster the fact that he 17 had for his opinion. All of the examples we have given you;. 18 and we have not lacked for examples,,.are to the contrary, that 19 these facilities .can be built adjacent to schools, theycan be 20 ' built adjacent to daycare centers, they. can be built adjacent: 21 to shopping centers, residential areas, and those residential - 22 areas continue to develop, continue to.increase in value, and:. 23 continue to be a safe and pleasant place to live_ 24 This facility has a, it's sort of •its a ;facility 25 that people would initiallyreact: and say I don't want it. 263 1 And many people that you've,heard- from today believe that. 2 They don't want It. Just the sound'of'lit makes it''something 3 they don't want. We.don't plan -and we don't zone and we don't 4 govern land use on that kind ,of a.basis. 5 One witness spent a'great deal of time talking abut 6 the financial viability ofthese institutions. I'm going to 7 leave it to Mr. Coppom-to--respond to that in some' --detail 8 because he is much -more knowledgeable than I. But this is not 9' a facility that is being built so -people will come. We're not 10 plowing up the corn and building a.ball field. This -facility 11 will not be -built unless there -is 'a'contract for its use. All 12 of the examples used by that. witness facilities that: 13were built -without -contracts and:she'very clearly stated that 14-_ to you. In each instance the facilities-were.built without a 15 contract for housing inmates-. Thatwill not: occur in this: 16 case. There has been no -request and. no request is' 17 contemplated for tax-exempt:bond financing. ' The county will 18 .not .be a part of the .bonding structure: as presently 19.- contemplated. Regular,! I'm sorry, taxable bonds will be the 20 preferred fora of financing :and Mr Coppom can 'again. address: 21 that. So the.: study which: -she quoted to you at length is 22'' , accurate__ Her representations are accurate. Her facts are 23 not at all good and .it's: not at all. relevant to what -me are. 24' •doing here.' 25:. T would submit that there,has been presented to you' 264 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 at great length, a substantial body of evidence concerning the 2 nature of the surrounding area, concerning the nature of the 3 PUD, concerning the compatibility of this facility to the 4 surrounding land uses, as presently zoned and as we can all 5 anticipate they will be ultimately used. I would respectfully 6 submit to you that you have anobligation to vote yes on this proposal. This proposal is a valid use of an existing..Planned 8 Unit Development and is within the scope of that. 9 I need to add one other comment before I quit. And 10 .that has to do with the law enforcement authority. Note A on 11 the plat and Note A on the resolution refers to a law 12. enforcement authority. There's agreat deal of concern been 13 expressed by some of the neighbors concerning law enforcement 14 in the area. It's our viewthat that probably is not an 15. appropriate note on a PUD because it has no relationship to 16 use and the performance standards and development standards 17 that the county normally places, and by the way the balance of 18 the performance of the notes do relate to use, this :one does 19 not. But that's neither.. here nor there. The county, under 20 the statute relating to law enforcement authorities, is: 21 empowered to create such authority, and only you are. We': 22 cannot create it, only you can create it. If that note 23 remains a part of the plat we will, prior to filing the final: 24 . Plat, if approved, :request the county to form such an 25, authority. It's my understanding -that the county now believes. 265 2- 3 4 that have remained unfunded and are not operating. To be 5 viable, the authority would have to include a large area of 6 ground, and I think it was intended -that -this law -enforcement 7 authority could be expanded to include other land, which of 8 course it can be. That can only be done with the consent of 9 the people who own the land, or I'm sorry, it can only be done 10 after a vote of the neighbors to accept the law enforcement 11 authority and only after a vote on the funding of it, if it's. 1 that is not good policy, part because of Amendment 1 -and the problems of getting funding :for these. It's also my understanding that the county has formed a number of these 12 to be funded. We have no objection:to the formation of such 13 an authority prior to the recording of the final plat -if that 14 .is what the county continues to require; and if it continues. 15 to require it, we will .insist -that you form one so- that the 16 project can go in accordance. with -all of the terms . of the 17 notes of the plat.. Other than that note, the notes are 18 acceptable and they have been complied with. 19 With respect to the funding "of the roadwa y, the. 20 highway, I read that —requirement as making sure the county 21 doesn't have to do it, it says the developer has to do -it. In 22 this, case the state is doing. all of it, I understand. The 23 developer will have to contribute if that doesn't remain true. 24 And the developer is prepared. to -do -that. 25 . So I submit that all the requirements have been met, 266 1 1 1 1 i I I I 1 1 1 that the zoning PUA uses can be read -broadly and not narrowly. 2 I would further submit that the uses that we -have proposed, as 3 has been stated, meet the: listed uses in terms of 4 rehabilitation centers and that's institutional facilities as 5 contemplated by the -Zoning: Ordinance and therefore is 6 permitted, and I would request you vote yes.. 7 Mr. Coppom-has a few additional remarks. 8 MR. COPPOM: I would like to close, but I. would like 9 to clarify a number of issues that were stated.- Briefly. 10 Number 1. In regard to. visitors:, visitation will only occur 11 on Saturday morning', Saturday afternoon, Sunday.morning, 12 :Sunday afternoon. That means that -the population will be 13 divided into fourths; 75 would have visitors. Ourexperience 14 running a drug treatment: program with state offenders as well. 15 as other facilities, indicate -that only 30-$ of offenders at. 16 any given time have:visitors, so it's 30 -times, approximately 17 75, so about, only 21, 25 of the offenders:at any given time 18 would, have visitors or visitation. Now that doesn't really. 19 put a great -number uf people- into that area, but it -does put 20 some in there and -I think -we've presented evidence -to show: 21 that visitors create no problems at. all to a community. 22 . COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER Could you clarify that for.: - 23 them, so an inmate only basically/hat-one. time where.he can 24 have visitors,--one'sessionT 25 MR. COPPOMr. One--time-,a-:week, that's correct.: 267 1 i. Zither on a Saturday. - 2 COMMISSIONER KIRXMEYER:: SO even though there, or is 3 there another four:visitation period, 4 MR...COPPOM: It's different groups. 5 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEXER: 411147r inmate couldn't have 6 four visitations: in that;week7 7 MR. COPPOM: No, he could not. And also I would 8 point out to you that: we are in control of the visitors. We 9 can run criminal checks on them and -any visitor that does not 10 meet our criteria is: -excluded from visitation. And if we find - 11 . out that there -is visitorin the community causing any 12 problems, they can be dropped byus immediately from'any sort 13 of visitation in our facility. 14 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: What would. make you do a 15 visitor background check? 16 MR..COPPOM:. I think that first of all .we want to 17 have quality 'visitors as we do. presently in. our own drug 18 treatment -program. . And.. everyone is going to have :to go 19 through a screen for :visitation to make sure that it's a 20 legitimate visit. We don't want buddies..and cronies -coming in 21 to visit people. So we are, we are very -serious about the 22 .._type of business that we're about, the rehabilitation of these. 23 offenders, and:we're not -going to. have, cronies. coming in and 24 out of the facilities. So generally legitimate family:members:; 25 --need to come. in-to,make_the:visits. 268 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER:Will the screening take 2 place at the facility? 3 MR. COPPOM: Yes, it does, prior to, prior to. The 4 offender files a request to have a visitor and then that 5 screening takes place. 6 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: So you don't wait until the 7 visitor shows up and then screen them? 8 MR. COPPOM: That's correct. The second point I'd 9 like to clarify is a point that was made by Frank Canapa who 10 made a; stated a quote out of the- RFP. He stated that the 11 contractor may not unreasonably refuse to accept any offender 12 assigned to the facility. I would not second guess him, but 13 the implication was any offender. No, to me it's like saying 14 a pre -parole release center can have a non -parolee in there. 15 No, every person coming- in to our facility has to `have a 16 written, have already met with the parole board, have a 17 written parole release date and it generally' would be within 18 90 days on the average of release. He. failed, however, to 19 quote another part of an addendum to the RFP, the same REP. 20 It says this:"The Department of Corrections will have clearly 21 defined policy and eligibility criteria for the placement of 22 offenders in the pre -parole facility and program. The 23 contractor will not be sent offenders who do not meet this 24 criteria." That is a mutually worked out set of criteria and 25 there is an area where we would disagree with the Department-' 269 1 2 minimum of 24 -hour notice of paperwork of who's coming in, 3 there is a way to arbitrate someone that we do not want in 4 that facility. 5 Third rebuttal that I'd like to make has to do with of Corrections about an offender coming in, and we have a 6 7 And the first part:of what -she said about speculative prisons, 8 I absolutely agree with and, all, of those -prisons that she 9 quoted in Texas, which were actually more than the six that 10 -.she mentioned, I, have been aware of and haveread the 11 literature on and had -checked into. And as a matter of fact, 12. Texaswas just burgeoning with prisoners and towns, little 13- small towns jumped on the -bandwagon -thinking that they could 14 build prisons -with tax -free -bonds -and be successful, and making 15 ,,.money and attract then, of course, business and employees into 16 : those towns. .They built these prisons on speculation without 17 - „ good design. Most of them were. built without even knowing the 18- management -of these facilities and then when the Department of 19 Corrections came in and said, oh we'll, -.use_ those,absolutely 20 , not.. They weren't designed correctly and they didn't have a 21 management team that could actually run them. So they did go 22 belly -up. And most„ of them now are beginning -to work ,23 .- ,themselves out. -Kathy.Neiley stated something very correctly. 24 . She said that her sources, and.she quoted. -a source that said, 25 and: I. quote her.,_ "Investors, should insist on firm.,contracts- some statements. that Kathy Meiley made about spec prisons. 270 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 before Communities themselves ' get involved with these 2 facilities." And I can assure you that we are not building on 3' speculation and not one brick will be laid before we sign that 4 contract that will specifically say -how our facility will be 5 run, operated, and the length of time that we'll have, in 6 terms of some guarantees into the future. 7 In summary, I'd like to say that we, I believe, have 8 shown compliance with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan and 9 the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. Testimony and evidence has 10 shown that the proposed use fits a -commercial definition in 11 accordance with your ordinances. All technical, 12 architectural, and engineering requirementshave been 13 satisfied. Extensive, independent evidence and testimony has 14 clearly shown that the proposed land usage., a pre -parole 15 release center is compatible with the adjacent land uses and 16 will not present any community safety issues. This has been 17 shown by over 30 examples, not from Charles Thomas who' -really 18 is a researcher at the University of Florida and who has been 19 quoted mostly by Ann -Garrison but not by us, but by examples 20 taken from Larimer'County, from Boulder County, and from 14 21 different states and facilities classified at all levels. 22 These examples demonstrate only, positive effects of the 23 development'of correctional facilities, specific evidence on 24 these effects are' concluded from county jails, state 25 correctional -facilities-, .private' pre -parole release 'centers= 271 1 and federal correctional institutions.. The evidence has shown 2 that correctional facilities do -not deter future business, 3 residential development on adjacent, properties. They do not 4 adversely affect land values, and present no community safety 5 issues. Anything said to the contrary has been 6 unsubstantiated. No factual evidence was presented to the 7 contrary. This type of facility is needed in the State of 8 Colorado. We have to do a better job of what we're doing. 9 I am not going to_go off on'a tangent, but I would 10 love to share with you ,what. I think are some great 11 achievements in. thecriminal justice system, these. days. 12 Unlike, contrary to what Virginia Scheel said, in Monday's 13 paper the FBI reported a drop in crime again in Colorado. The 14 crime rate in Colorado stayed constant now for the last 12 15. years. But on Monday, we had a report that serious crime 16 dropped 3-1/2%. We are doing, some• right things.• And maybe 17 part of that is longer sentences. You are not looking at a 18 company that buys into a liberal policy of handling offenders. 19 Ours is a serious, severe type, but nevertheless fair type of 20: treatment of offenders. We know that the evidence supports 21 this type of facility to the benefit of Colorado citizens, and- 22 to the benefit of fewer victims. 23. You know, as Joe Cox,, our next door -neighbor, said, 24 an sex -police; officer that when we, moved ,into The Villa 25 challenged us and was irate,- saying how can I, live next to a 272 1 e 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1'- correctional facility and he stands'up -here ten years later 2 saying they're better than anything I've ever had in the 3 neighborhood.- we've had an excellent reputation and most of 4 the opposition has said that. -That our reputation has been 5 respected in this community. We are community -minded, and 6 I've said it over and over and so has Michael Brand. We want 7 to be good neighbors, and we will work out issues with the 8 neighborhood no matter how large that neighborhood is. And we 9 will work in a constructive, positive way to be an asset to a 10 community and particularly, I hope, at Del Camino. - 11 I want to thank you for your indulgence. As I said 12 before I think you've been Herculean about your response in 13 listening and your questions and I thank you very much. 14 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Are there any questions 'for Mr. 15 Coppom? 16 COMMISSIONER BAXTER: Yes, I have one question I 17 don't know that it's been completely, adequately answered and 18 that's, there was at least the implication made that there are- 19 not enough people qualified or whatever in the system to, say, 20 provide enough people to fill this -facility who truly meet the 21 criteria. That you'd have to go deeper into and get -people 22 who should not be in this facility and-try"to classify them: 23 differently. You know, !I know that we touched on that 24 earlier, but that question was -.asked -and''I'd like your 25- .: response. 273 1 MR.-COPPOM:,- Well the answer -to that is untrue, and 2 we have Tom Waters here from; the Department of Corrections who 3 could probably answer itbetter than I -could. But we showed 4 you figures: 9,270 offenders in the system December 31st of 5 last year and I have figures as recent as November 5th of this 6 year that show in the next four years we're going to add 7 another 2,500 offenders to „the, prison system. Of those 8 classified within the -level that we're talking about, there 9 are more than enough offenders, and -in terms of the number of 10 parolees coming out of the system, each year, this facility 11 could not begin to handle those that are classified as minimum 12 risk. It is the largestDOC population• Oh, excuse me, what 13 Michael's handing me is a note that said,.as we pointed out, 14 - that the largest increase -in the prison population is the non - 15 violent offenders and the drug offenders that are being 16 incarcerated. 17 COMMISSIONER BAXTER:- Here's what I'm getting at. 18 You feel that there are now_ and will be enough people to 19- choose from; that you can pick and choose as to who .you will 20. allow in_ the. facility and not have to take those you don't 21. want? 22 MR. COPPOM: That's correct. That is correct. 23 Absolutely. As a matter of -fact,, there is an overflow.in the 24 neighborhood of about800-offenders each year who meet that 25 criteria that we could not handle at an averagepopulation of 274 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 .300. 2 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: .I guess the question was also 3 asked by oneof the speakers. of, where do they come from. 4 Could you answer basically where do they come from?,I-assume 5 they want to know if they come from Canon City or the 6 MR. COPPOM: The implication of the question, 7 because I've heard it so many times .before and, is that our 8 facility would be filled with. the rejects from community 9 corrections. It's my experience and it should be your 10 experience that community corrections boards are,some.of the 11 most conservative boards that I have ever worked. with. They 12 are composed of district: attorneys, police chiefs and lay. 13 citizens. Weld County's community corrections board is 14 probably known tobe third or fourthmost conservative in the 15 state and I get the figures every month in the number of 16 rejects, the.offenders who meet: the criteria for community. 17 corrections who are referred.. to our ;board and -they're 18 rejecting at any given month..between 45% and. 55%.of the' 19 offenders referred to our facility, even though'they meet the 20 criteria. So to say that people that are being rejected from, 21 community corrections are therefore the most violent -and the 22 = serious is, I think; a gross exaggeration. They are the more: 23 serious offenders that our board doesn't want in our program. 24 because we have a waiting list in -our'program, as.you know: J 25 • I mean our program stays -full all the time. We. don't need to 275 1 take the more, the offenders that are one grade above the 2 group that we're takingright now 3 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: And to clarify that for the 4 public, your facility at The Villa is considered a community 5 corrections facility. 6 MR: COPPOM: Yes, we have two programs there. One 7. is called the Restitution_ -Center, that is a 78 -bed community 8 corrections program. It takes non-violent offenders that all 9 must be accepted through a_community corrections board. The 10 other program that we operate there -is a 58-beddrug treatment 11 program for felony offenders out of the prison system who meet 12 the same criteria that would.come.into this facility. And" 13 generally speaking, the populationthat we have in that drug 14 ' treatment program is.the same 'population as we would -have in 15 this pre -parole release center. I would pointout the, 16. difference is that the ono we. handle in our. residential 17- ' treatment program are in what we call a.closed program, it's-. 18 not a locked program. :And I am, one escapee, one person that 19 walks away from the facility isnot a"pleasure. . One crime. 20 isn't a pleasure. But we're in a business in which, -I mean,: 21: we. must .realize, I -mean,-that: human behavior is :not 100% 22controllable either. But we've run 2,500 offenders through: 23.,- that program and in that closed program in. which the doors are 24-. unlocked but there es body. management, there's been 12 walk- 25 aways out -of, 2,500effenders. And I_believe-all of those.: 276 1 I I 1 1 1 1 walk-aways have been weld County residents, have they not? ' 2 All except one parolee. The fact that they were right in the 3 Weld County area, they felt they had some place to go to. One 4 in the Denver group that was leaving our facility. But in ' 5 five years, law enforcement people will tell you that's an 6 extraordinary figure. It really does say somett;ing about body ' 7 management and probably a substantive program that really can ' 8 keep the offenders working on their specific problem, in this 9 case chemical dependency. ' 10 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: And did you say that's an 11 unlocked facility or a locked' facility? 12 MR. COPPOM: It's locked only going into it. It's 13 unlocked coming out of it, but it is, in other words, if you 14 were inside.and a fire occurred you could get out. •And.so you ' 15 could, walk out the door. But you couldn't walkup to the door_ 16 and walk into it. You have to ring a bell and be admitted. 17 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: But the facility that you're 18 planning, the, one we're talking about now is a -locked 19. facility? 20 MR. COPPOM: That's right. The building, is;secure 21 and 22 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: And they will not come and go and 23 be on a work -release program? ,- 24 MR.,COPPOM:. That's right, it has nothing to do with 25 community at that point. _Yeah, the .building is secure, the 277 1 14 15 16 17- 1 'outer perimeter is secure. 2 COMMISSIONER WEBSTER: Now there's no fencing around 3 the Villa, is that correct? 4 MR.'COPPOM: That's correct. 5 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: ' There were some other 6 concerns brought up by some of the citizens- and I'd like to 7 hear your rebuttal. First of all;: I think you answered this 8 once, what about the insurance? It was brought up that you 9 don't have insurance, but I thought you said you did. 10 MR. COPPOM. I'm. sure that there's been some- 11 facility someplace that- has'been underinsured. But that's, 12 our insurance is all state mandated. The state tells us 13 exactly how much insurance wehaveto Cover_ And insurance is' a very big issue, it's a very costly -issue for us -I might tell. you. And we do studies every -year involved in many of them and I -know what the average been in any of those and there have"been very few 18 might tell you. 19 20 21 for that and I But at the same -time we cover, we multi -million dollar coverages just for the -sake of" protection. COMMISSIONER KIRYMEYER: 've been loss has losses I do carry The other question had to 22 deal with offenders from"other states will be permitted at: 23 this facility, is that true? 24 MR. COPPOM:`- I'd like'to'have Michael answer that. 25 MR. BRAND: The answer. is -no, this is strictly a.: 278 1 r 1 1 1 1 1 1 i i 1 1 1 1 1 Colorado Department of Corrections contract for people coming 2 out of Colorado Department of Corrections facilities. There 3 may be some people that are,in the program that have.a-parole 4 destination of ,some other state and we would have to 5 coordinate that transportation to that, but they were all 6 convicted of crimes and ,sentenced in Colorado. 7 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER:- Is that part .of -the statute 8 or part of the mandate that they.all have to be sentenced in 9 Colorado? 10 MR. BRAND: That's part -of the RFP, .the enabling, 11 legislation wants to deal with Colorado inmates. They're not 12 going to allow other inmates to come in and absorb their, 13 money. 14 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: What about the question for 15 outside management? Is than true?. 16 MR. COPPOM: Let me answer that. -Not in the sense. 17 that it was stated. MTC is Management_Training Corporation. - 18 It is the largestprovider of.training for job corps in the: 19 nation. It is $167 million dollar a year company located in, 20 near Salt Lake City., We have :aminor contract with that; 21 company, It is not a -management contract and they are not a 22 major player in ,our _facility...Butcthey_have.an excellent,,;: 23 super program - for training of offenders ,which has been 24 implemented_across,this country. And as I„said,the largest; 25 provider of this_. training for job training in. the country. 279 1 1 And we saw what they had, even though we had developed our 2 own, and we really felt that they -had a' lot of skill in a 3 particular area of'that training, not all of the training, but 4 a small area. And so -we -had talked with -them about"coming in 5 and providing that one narrow area of training. It doesn't 6 have anything to do with taking over the facility. They have 7 no management decisions in the facility or anything like that. 8 COMMISSIONER 'KIRKMEYER:- Then that would probably 9 lead into my question earlier about the employment -base and 10 where you see that[coming from. Someone answered earlier 25` 11 to 30 mile radius,"but.I•d like -to know what your answer to 12 that would be. ' 13 MR. COFFOM: Well, you know at The Villa -right now,: 14 most of our employees come -from Greeley -and -Evans and Kersey, 15 but we do have several -employees who come over from Ft. - 16 Collins. I think -Harry Asmus:"-answer was frankly correct, if 17 you take a facility and -locate Yit, you have 110 -jobs and 18 they're fairly good -paying jobs,- you're -going to -:have a 19 population base around:that facility as you come -out; that is. 20 going to apply -for -that position. :-We're going to favor, as 21 much as we possibly and reasonably can, because we are: 22 committed to the community, to Weld County and -the surrounding 23 areas So there's :going :to: be -".some type --of favoritism in 24 terms of that type:of employment, but we'will get applicants 25 : from furtheraway:z There:wirl. be requirements, however for 280 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 response time. I think that was mentioned before, that within 2 so many minutes., we want to beable to_have 3$ or 40 staff 3 there. If we have to shake down the -facility, for example, if 4 you lose something in the .facility, we want to find it. We 5 want, you know, 35 people there and we're going to, shake it 6 down. 7 I would point out that the nuclear plant did close 8 down and we were contacted by -the security people -there. I 9 think they had 70 security people. Their wages there were 10 very close to the type of wages that.we pay for security, and 11 many of those people who lived in the surrounding area, in the 12 small towns up and down 85, want to stay in the security area. 13 Some of those would work out welkin a correctional:setting, 14 some would not because ,sometimes -you can work better with - 15 things than you can with people and -you really have to -have a_ 16 certain skill. Every one of our correctional officers will go 17 through a program that is the same -as the State -Correctional 18 Officer Training Program, so-they'11.,be professionally.trained 19 as correctional officers. 20 COMMISSIONER WEBSTER:: I think you just .answered, 21 but the other thing --is, are.those people that you employ, are - 22 they bonded in any way? 23 MR..: COPPOM: Every,.. not only are we required to 24 carry the million dollars liability,., insurance, we also carry 25 a professional liability, -insurance. so that if any person 281 1 1 conducts business on -our behalf in'a way that's unprofessional 2 or whatever we -are -also covereda separate type of policy for 3 that and that's mandated by the state: 4' COMMISSIONER-KIRK.MEYER: Another comment was made 5 about the state could pull the contract at any time? -Do you 6 have a rebuttal for that? 7 MR. COPPOM: I think Tom Waters said that well, i 8 mean, ultimately we have-to•realize that the state is' a God 9 `unto itself and it can -do an"awful lot of things. And we can 10'. also"sit around wondering what they can do and whatuif's and 11 scare ourselves to death What -if they take over my home 12. property and build a`prison-on it?' They can do that, there's 13 nothing you tan do about -stopping -that.- But they're not going 14 to 'do that in reality. And we know, for example, when the 15 Department- of Corrections tried to put, excuse me, the- 16 ' Division of Youth Services, tried to put a correctional 17`' facility at Ridge Home last -year, the legislators in that area 18 - stopped that and I -mean there's some controls' built into that. 19 Would they pull the contract? .If the state -didn't have money, - 20' 'they could possibly pull the contract, sure they could. 21 COMMISSIONER"KIRKM£YER: The other part to add on to 22 that, something was mentioned about giving something:back to 23 the community. What do you -"feel that` -the pre-release facility 24 gives -tack 'to'thecommunity2 MR. COPPOM: I" -think 'that that's a legitimate - 282 e 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 request. As a matter of fact, the lady that'listed off many 2 of those statements, there was one, obviously $8 a day would' 3 break us, the margin isn't that good, not even close: But I 4 do think that companies need to participate on a regular basis 5 in the community and give back in certain ways. The Villa 6 does do that. •I mean we participate in many activities in the 7 community and you see our names in sponsoring events, 8 including the, well maybe I don't really want to promote any 9 of those particular charities at this time, but we promote, we 10 do promote and get involved "in a number of large financial 11 contributions and promotions of different endeavors in the 12 community. And would we in that area? Absolutely. One of 13 the things that I would like to say, I guess to everybody in 14 here, -is that correctional people basically are really good 15 stable people. They're the people that joined the ball clubs 16 and get involved in the different activities of the school, 17 the PTA, they're really just mainstream, good citizens and 18' they're very active and that leads back into the facility and 19 that's the same at The Villa. I have employees who walk in 20 and say would you sponsor tha-, would you sponsor that, and we 21 get involved in those sort of things through our employees as 22 well. 23 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: What about the concept of 24 the Community Advisory'Board 25 MR. COPPOM: We believe that that is absolutely 283 1 necessary, that. there be formed a representative group .of that 2 area and that they meet with us in terms of any community 3 issues or any of the concerns that they have. That goes with 4 everything from lighting to, you know, the traffic or maybe an 5 employee that isn't really doing something he should do, you 6 know early in the morning over at McDonalds or whatever. We 7 really need to have that type of participation, yes. 8 COMMISSIONER KI'RKMEYER: There was another question 9 about the plan for the balance of the land, and I guess 10 basically that means are you looking to expand or what are you 11 going to do with the other 30 acres or whatever isout. there? 12 MR. COPPOM: Well, I don't know if I should say 13 this, on behalf of my partners. We did not ask to buy all of 14 that land. That was part of the deal,, so we ended up getting 15 the land. The POD is only on 22 acres and anything else on 16 the rest of the land has to come, again, before this Board. 17 so there are, I mean, the whole land hasto be redeveloped. 18 So our POD is only on the 22 acres, it'snot on the other part 19 of the land and there would have to be public process for 20 dealing with anything on the rest of that land. Maybe someone 21 in herewould like to buy it from us, I don't know. We have 22 no plans at this time. 23 CHAIRMAN HARBERT:. I believe the rest of that land 24 is in agriculture, is that _.a fact? 25 MR. COPPOM:,. No, it's not. ..No. 284 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 e 1 CHAIRMAN-HARBERT: Oh, that's what you're putting in 2 wheat grassorbuffalo grass or something? 3 MR. COPPOM: Yes. The primary part of that land is 4 going to stay agriculture. It's going to have cornfields in 5 there, I mean they will continue to be planted. 6 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Well, that's what I'm saying, the 7 other 30 acres is in corn now, is it not? 8' MR. COPPOM: That's right, it's in corn, it'll stay 9 in corn. 10 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: So, you're going to lease that 11 out to somebody if you don't sell it? 12 MR. COPPOM: Probably. It's under a lease right now 13 and I don't want to say anything publicly at this point 14 because there may be some other people interested in that, but 15 it probably, it will stay in agricultural, in corn or 16 something like that. 17 COMMISSIONER KIRXXEYER: My understanding was that 18 you were going to plant that crested wheat grass. 19 MR. COPPOM: I think that's -on the back part of the 20 22 acres that is to be controlled. In other words, where the 21 building is at, it's that area back around that would not have 22 -green grass on it. 23 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: And then are you, is this - 24 facility or the site of this facility located in the Mountain 25 View District and do you pay taxes into that district? 285 1 MR. COPPOM: Yes, that's correct. 2 COMMISSIONER RIRAMEYER:-Do you have any idea what 3 the amount of taxes are that are being collected off of that 4 right now for that district? 5 MR. COPPOM: No I do not,. The chief is here, but 6 one of the things ',really don't want to ever speak to is the 7 issue of taxes. I want the tax experts to make those 8 statements rather than us. But the chief is here and he may 9 already know what that is. 10 MR. BRAND: The Mountain View Fire District did an 11 estimate of taxes that would be received as a result of this 12 development,if you -want to ask either -the chief or the head 13 of the district. They're both here. 14 COMMISSIONER KIRKKEYER. Yes, I'd like toask them. 15 I'd like to know what it is. 16 CHIEF WARD: I'm Gerry Ward,Mountain View Fire 17 Chief. The estimates that we arrived at was based strictly on 18 the total build -out costs and it would be approximately 19 $15,O0O. to $18,000 annually ,would beour estimate based on 20_ today's mill levy. for the fire district. 21 CHAIRMAN HARBERT:-.. So if you collected the $15,000- 22 to $18,000 a year, would that reduce the levy. then to the 23 other, taxpayers and contributors to- .that district? 24, CHIEF WARD: ;I.could not say that that would happen,. 25 no.. 286 1 1 1 r 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I e 1 COMMISSIONER BAXTER: -I guess the question, what do 2 you feel like the financial burden for your district would be 3 for this facility? Do you feel this is adequate, that this 4 would put you in a hardship? 5 CHIEF WARD: I don't think at this point we have 6 enough information to answer that question properly.. Right 7 now we're dealing with a.number that was providedus from the 8 weld County, Boulder County, Larimer County. detention centers 9 which indicates that we may expect approximately 20 calls per 10 year. If those numbers are accurate, then the impact 11 financially is not going to be that, large. However, we have 12 to work with the facility managers and so forth, should this 13 be approved, to talk about -the: appropriate comprehensive 14 emergency planning and so forth that we would require to be: 15 assured that our people are.safe to enter that property and to 16 take care of any emergency that might. be our responsibility. 17 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: Okay, then let:me.just ask 18 you a couple of other questions. There was _some, questions, 19 whatever, concerns regarding the emergency- response time 20 there. I know you sent a letter in to us, I couldn't find it. 21 amongst all this other stuffwe've got. So could you maybe: 22 rebut that; they have that, you wouldn't be able to respond::: 23 And they are also concerned about the time that it, takes to 24 dispatch Mountain View to that area. 25 CHIEF WARD: Our response,.: our: organization is 287 1 1 somewhat of a unique organization in that' we have seven fire 2 stations, six of them being all -volunteer and one being a 3 career -staffed group. The career -staffed station is a support 4 for our volunteers because you never know how many you're 5 going to, of course pull, during an emergency. Our station, 6 our closest station is an a -1 -volunteer station that would be 7 approximately a couple of miles away. So they would be first 8 response in. Our back-up career'staff, comes from County Line 9 Road just south -of Highway 119, so they're going to be fairly 10 close behind our volunteers. Average response time to the 11 facility 'would probably=be in the 15 to 20 minute area 12 depending on the time of day, time of the :year and so forth 13 because our volunteers have to leave what they're doing, come 14 to the station, man the equipment 'and move_ The other 15 question regarding communications, there have 'certainly been 16 - problems-in•the past, isolated problems in the past with 911. 17 -Our dispatch center again -is Boulder:- County because the 18 ' majority of our emergency runs or calls come from the Boulder 19 County area. With the enhanced- 911` system we've seen an 20 improvement in that, but -there, are still -glitches --in the- 21 system. In other -words, we have noted of 20 -minute response 22 delays or -dispatch delays because the call didn't properly go 23 from Veld, County to Boulder County;or'there was some sort of 24 electronic problem.that delayed thatcall But, routinely it. 25 works pretty well. 288 I 1 I I I I l COMMISSIONER KIRKMEXER:• Have your volunteers 2 expressed any concerns about, their safety should they have to 3 respond to the facility? 4 CHIEF WARD: No, not to me, they have not. 5 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Are there any other questions? 6 Thank you 7 COMMISSIONER WEBSTER: I've got one for John on the 8 same subject, a little bit, I would expect that this facility 9 would have minimum fire equipment within it, wouldn't it? 10 MR. COPPOM: I think, that's something that we're 11 willing to work out with the fire district. 12 COMMISSIONER WEBSTER: Extinguishers, things like. 13. that, that would be located there_ .. . 14 MR. COPPOM: We're going, to be heavily, staffed and 15 it is a fully sprinkled building.. It's fully sprinkled, it 16 meets all the codes. 17 COMMISSIONER BAXTER: I have a followup question.' 18 Going back to what we were talking about a minute ago, along 19 with taking people from the community and where you; would get 20 them, it also was: mentioned where you wouldbuy your input, 21 your supplies and all that, that you would not need to and, 22 would not buy themin thatareaor the county, that they'd' 23 ' probably have tocome out of Denver.., I'm just interested in, 24 your response to that. 25 MR. COPPOM: Let me say, talk at least in terms of: - 289 1 our present operation, because I -think the operation at Del 2 Camino would be almost the•' same. We made a commitment years 3 ago that we were going to stay in -Weld County and the only 4 contract that we have out of Denver that I know of is Nobel - 5 Sysco and Nobel-Sysco keeps begging me because we keep 6 transferring more and more of their business to local 7 establishments. But quite frankly, we get excellent service 8 out of the local people and better,'I-shouldn't say, but we 9 get more regular deliveries as well. So we spend in the 10 neighborhood of about $100,00 a month right now in the local 11 community over and above the.salaries; just in terms of food 12 and all the equipment that we buy and that sort of thing. And - 13 that's the same type of commitment that we would have.- If we 14 can get it locally, we're going to get itlocallyand that's 15- the direction that we would 'move in. 16 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: -Another question that was 17- 'brought up was that you wouldn't use I-25 as your access 18' route, that you'd get off earlier and perhaps take Weld County 19 Road 11 and 13. to your site?._ Doyou have a defined access 20 - road to the site? -'In -other -words; do -you have to go 1-25 to' 21- 119? 22 MR. COPPOM: Well, -that -is' the route thatwewould'. 23 take. I'm not sure that there's -even -a reason to take the 24 others. We would have a secure vehicle. That secure vehicle: 25` --"does have 'communications tied into the -state patrol, not 290 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 because there's a problem or danger, it's just good management 2 technique to always have those safeguards. We have to have an 3 established route. The best established route, in terms of 4 coverage, is 1-25 and it is with, I mean I can't even envision 5 why the question would be raised. That is the corridor that 6 we would come up and down. 7 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: 'That kind of leads into•' another 8 point that was brought up, John, and that is that apparently 9 you were offered some land, and I can't tell which 'road that 10 is, the Siegrist land, apparently, but I` would assume that you 11 did not choose that because there was not good access? 12 MR. COPPOM: We looked at approximately, and I don't- 13 want to be held to this number, eight, well 8 to 12 different 14 properties in that area. We were shown those properties by 15 local owners who took us on those properties and to my 16 knowledge, all but one of them was willing to sell us that 17 land. We evaluated each of those in terms of the 18 infrastructure and a number of other issues. In one case, we 19 were offered a location, and I guess I feel like if I start 20 talking about those locations, people are going to say, ah, my 21 neighbor is willing to sell that land, or whatever: But one 22 of those locations -was .on a dirt road within 500 feet of a- 23 house that sat across from it. -` And 'we'felt that those were - 24 two negative things; we didn't want to'be right across from 25 that house and'we didn't -want' to be ona dirt road. And so we 291 1. weighed carefully those different. sites _ and we ended up 2 settling on the site that we thought had the infrastructure 3 that was best suited to remove ourselves from the greatest 4 number of homes, and I think we're Like.3/4 of a,mile from the 5 nearest home where we're located. And I think we have a 6 presentable building that is very non -intrusive. This 7 building, this profile here,actually is an elevated view 8 about 18 feet above the site, but the interstate is actually 9 lower than that area, so when you drive byit, you're not 10 going to be looking down on it, you're going to be kind of up 11 at it. It really is an excellent site.. 12 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Are there any other questions? 13 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: I justhave two more. 14 questions. 15 MR. COPPOM: I might also,. Connie, excuse me 16 Chairman, if I might, some of the, other areas we ,looked at, 17. were not in the MUD or a PUP.. We -.had to start right from the 18, beginning, so they're agricultural. 19 COMMISSIONER. KIRKMEYER:__ The question I asked 20 .earlier of the other attorney,. Mr. Dahl,. and maybe you can: 21 - answer it, maybe you're more familiar with this Act, but at 22 any place in this Act. and that was„ 1327, do, they define pre 23 parole facility as a prison? 24 MR._.COPPOM: No. But there is a,.section.in there, 25 that I'm sure you're turned,, to•right, now. that says. a pre - 292 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1� 1 parole release center is, -end -then ''itl-ists--it in:the next 2 several three or four paragraphs, it 'says that say it must 3 have these type of courses. There's a whole paragraph in 4 there that says these types of programs, and they address 5 specific types of programs that have to be in that pre -parole 6 release center. The very first paragraph that defines the 7 secure facility, defines it generically and then it defines a 8 pre -parole center specifically because it has these type of 9 rehabilitation programs built into -it. 10 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Another question that Mrs. 11 Scheel, I believe brought up was that somewhere in -this Act - 12 she interpreted- that they could go to a local community: 13 college or that sort of thing. Am I correct that you do not' 14 - let these pre -parolees out to go to school-, that -anything they, 15 take must be within the walls of -that facility? 16 MR. COPPOM:` It's a totally self-contained building. 17 Even the medical and dental services. Only a major medical- 18 emergency would get -a person out of there'. Heart attack. And 19 then they would be transferred as quickly. as possible to the 20 diagnostic medical tenter on Smith Road 'in Denver. 21 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Answer my : question. They do not 22 go to Aims, they do not go to Boulder Community -College, they= 23 don't go anywhere like that. 24 MR. COPPOM: They do not go to a college, no. They 25cannot go out --into the community, period,-ta`anything, to any' 293 1, place until they're released. 2 COMMISSIONER BAXTER:_.I guess _to be bluntly honest, 3 I think the question probably.went little further than that, 4 that.: -whether you would recommend or -have anything to do with 5 them going on to one of those schools after they were released 6 from the pre -parole. 7 MR. COPPOM: The answer to that.is that if they're 8 going to be paroled back -,Into their home community and they 9 are interested in, let's _say some technical training, and 10. that's part. of their -parole program, yes- we will tie them back. 11 .into that local program. We do -that right now with, we have 12 2,200 offenders either under probation or parole in Weld 13 County.. I don'.t know how many of those, as a former chief 14 probation officer, I can:assure you that some -of those are out 15 at Aims college and.some are. at the university._ In fact, some 16 of:them were students when they.went.on probation. So that is 17, a part of rehabilitation with -certain individuals It's not 18 the vast majority, though. We're not talking about, 50-70%. 19 We're talking about a very small percentage, 20 CHAIRMAN, HARBERT: If their home community is in 21 Pueblo,, then you're going to find them•a school in Pueblo to 22 • goto afterthey are released? Z3 MR. COPPOM: After, they're released. -Never before 24 they.are released. That's..correct. 25r.. COMMISSIONER RIRF(MEyER: ..,Are:they still serving time 294 1 I 1 1 I 1 r 1 on their sentences when they're at the pre-release or pre - 2 parole facility? 3 MR. COPPOM: They really have an established parole 4 date. The date is set that they're going to be paroled. They 5 are being released from the prison system, placed into a pre - 6 release center and it's the process of the release. 90 days 7 through a step process and they're released. 8 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: So 'that's considered part 9 of their sentence? 10 MR. COPPOM: Yes it is. 11 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Are there any other questions? 12 MR. COPPOM: Thank you so much. 13 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: I guess before we go on and 14 before there is a motion made or a vote taken, I would like to 15 first of all thank all of you for your participation and for 16 staying so late. We're going on almost 12 hours now. I know 17 it's been a very trying day for you. It certainly has been 18 for us. I would also like to thank our staff for supporting 19 us throughout this day. Our legal staff, planning staff, our 20 clerk to the board and the Sheriff's Department who has 21 delivered security for us. So now I will entertain a motion 22 if we have one. 23 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: I have a few questions for 24 the staff.: 25 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Oh, I'm sorry. Okay, go ahead. 295 1 18 County Planning Commission reviewed the application on the 19 15th of June of 1993 and did determine that the final PUD plan 14 application. And maybe. Y you need to answer the question why 15 you felt that the PUD District had not been abandoned. COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: Yes, I would like to ask 2 Keith. It was mentioned that the planning staff declared this 3 a valid application back in June of 1993. I'd like to know 4 what the basis were for you declaring it a valid application. 5 MR. SCHUETT: Keith Schuett, Department of Planning 6 Services. The Weld County Planning Staff reviewed the 7 application and the requirements for the Planned Unit 8 Development and we, as a staff, interpreted the application as 9 submitted as being a use allowed in the Planned Unit 10 Development and that was our presentation to the Planning 11 Commission on October 5, 1993. 12 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: I can understand that, but 13 first of all I want to know why you declared it a valid 16 MR. SCHUETT: Okay ,_I I see that as two questions. 17 One, as far as the PUD plan not being abandoned, the Weld 24 like. The request basically was to consider a request to 25 extend the submittal date of a final PUD plan. Extension of 20 for the New Creation Church was to be extended for one year 21 and that the plan had not been abandoned. And there is a 22 resolution, I believe in the recommendation, or in our packet 23 and I can read the entire recommendation to the Board if you'd' 296 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 the submittal date of the final plan for New Creation Church for one year due to changes -in management, road requirements on the original recommendation, and the possible sale of the property. The motion was seconded by Julie Ann Kronkle. The vote for passage was 6 in favor and 2 against. So it did, the resolution was passed. Did that answer your question on whether or not the plan had been abandoned? MR. MORRISON: I think the other thing he added is Section 28.15.5 dealing with that issue. It is not automatic. The application is, can be considered abandoned only after the hearing that determines it's not being diligently pursued; and rather than there simply being an' automatic abandonment as a result of the passage of time, the hearing is required. The hearing didn't take place in the first three years, but once it was held it was found that there had not been abandonment. CHAIRMAN'EARBERT: Okay, then you made a statement about this being a use allowed in this zone? Could you say the basis for that statement? MR. SCHUETT: Yes Ma'am. We reviewed all the uses, the Department of Planning'Services' staff reviewed all of the uses allowed in the Commercial Zone Districts and the I-1 Zone District and the staff's interpretation of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance and specifically in Section 5 of the Zoning Ordinance which deals with -interpretation, it does indicate that the uses allowed by rifle, temporary uses and uses by 297 special review listed in the ordinance are representative and 2 are not all-inclusive. So to saythat a use such as the 3 parole facility or prison is, not specifically listed, does not 4 mean that that use should not be located in there if it's felt 5 by staff that, based on the uses allowed in those zoned 6 districts, that the use f.s representative of those uses 7 allowed. 8 .COMMISSIONER KIRKMEyER: Are you trying to say that 9 you defined a pre-release _.facility basically as a 10 _ rehabilitation center? 11 MR. SCHUETT: I think you need_to go beyond that and. 12 look at all the uses allowed by right in all commercial zoned 13. districts. It basically isthe entire commercial zone 14 districts that Weld County has. So any commercial use has to 15 be located within one of those commercial, zone districts. 16 This is obviously a commercial endeavor and. we felt that it, 17 as a use, should be allowed, in the commercial zoned districts. 18 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: You feel it meets the 19 definition of a. rehabilitation center? 20 MR. SCHUETT: I feel that it is representative of a 21. rehabilitation center. I think that was the staff's 22, interpretation also that it could fit in with that. 23 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: M last Y question will be 24, for Lee, on page 6 of the letter that was submitted by their 2.5.. attorney, Gerald Dahl, on December 7,1993, he has that an LEA 298 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 'I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 prior the approval of the application, the plat requires the 2 formation of a law enforcement authority prior to the approval 3 of an -application. Could you add on to that or could you 4' interpret that for me, please. What do you feel that means? 5 MR. MORRISON: The language of that plat note is 6 that it is to be approved prior to recording of a plat of the 7 district. Mr. Dahl concludes that means prior, essentially to 8 this hearing. It's my view -that -that requirement, there 9 hasn't been a failure to meet that requirement because it is 10 not due until prior to the recording of an approved plan plat. 11 And there is not yet an approved plan plat to be recorded. So 12 that deadline has not yet come. 13 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: When does that deadline 14 come, then? 15 MR. MORRISON: Prior to the plat being recorded. 16 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER:' Then to remove that 17 requirement on'the-plat, the`County Commissioners would have 18- to remove that? 19 MR. SCHUETT: -Let' me just make one statement here. 20 It's the planning staff's opinion and'the legal staff may have 21 additional concerns or items stated there, if a PUD plan is 22 approved in a PUD District and there is a plat note requiring 23 that, and just because a PUD plan or this plan, should it be: 24: ' approved, does not mean that it's removing that plat note from 25 the change of zone plat. If there were future filings in this - 299 1 PUD plan, it may be deemed necessary to ,have the law 2 enforcement authority formed. And that would be determined 3 through the review process at that time. At this time, for 4 this application, the Sheriff,. representing Weld County, has 5 indicated that he does not feel that that is an appropriate 6 _requirement to require the law enforcement authority. Should 7 the Board. feel that they should go through the process of 8. establishing the law enforcement authority, they could still 9 go through the process; but if it is determined that the 10 Sheriff is not going to require that, that still does not mean 11 that that district has to be formed for this application. It 12 does not mean that it does not have to be formed for other 13 applications or other filings in this. POD. So you are not 14 removing that standard or plat note from the change of zone, 15 even. ifthat. note is not_ required through this PUD plan. 16, MR. MORRISON;..The mechanismis going to be when you 17. are requested, if a plan is approved, to create a law 18 enforcement authority. I mean, you have to take the first 19 step. In essence, the statute. provides thatyou create it but 20 it doesn't actually start .to exist until after a vote. 21 approving it occurs. But the initial steps, the. 22 Commissioners, if. the Board determines that one is not 23 appropriate, I think the Board is in effect, through an 24 appropriateprocess, relieving the applicant _ of that 25-_ obligation at the time you decide. But that isn't . before you,. 300 '- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 today and -it isn't yet ripe for decision. 2 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Any other questions for staff?- 3 COMMISSIONER WEBSTER: Does the staff have any 4 additional conditions of approval other than what are stated 5 here? 6 MR. SCHUETT: The ones that were on our October 7 5th presentation to the Planning Commission? They are the 8 same as what was rejected by the Planning Commission in their 9 recommendation. 10 MR. MORRISON: A reminder, the Planning Commission 11 made a motion which incorporated the recommendation of the, 12 planning staff, but then in their vote, elected not to adopt 13 it as their recommendation, So the form of the resolution 14 shows the form of the staff's recommendation, but it was not 15 adopted by the Planning Commission. 16 MR. SCHUETT: Were you asking me if there were any 17 additional ones besides what is in that? 18 COMMISSIONER WEBSTER: Yes. 19 MR. SCHUETT: I have jotted down some notes and I'm 20 sure that the Commissioners have too, as far as language. - 21 Some language that could be incorporated into number 2 on page 22 2 as far as notes on the PUD plat.L'There -could be additional 23 language added to that one to identify specifically that the 24 class of inmates being located at this facility would be Class 25 2. Minimum Restricted or Class- 1 -`Minimum Security. 301 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Additionally therecould betime frames associated with the length of stay that an inmate:would :be_ there. There was concerns about a minimum time frame. So a minimum time frame could also be added to that first item. under number 2. There are other ones that could be added, such as non-transferrable, that the use could not be transferred to any other interest such as what -we do on some Special Review Permits based on the applicant's representation through a public hearing. Additionally, note A could be reinforced as far as being required to be pursued, establishing the law enforcement.., authority. And then should, through that review process, it be.determined that it is not necessary, then it could be dropped at that point. COMMISSIONER WEBSTER: I think your second item on the length of stay would be,difficult unless you actually have 16 sought a contractual arrangement between the applicant and the 17 State of Colorado. 18 MR. SCHUETT: I agree. There was some information. 19 presented by legal staff from the ,State Correction Facility 20 that indicated 90 days or longer, but that was just, 21 ' COMMISSIONER WEBSTER: That's stated in the Act 22 here, is that correct? 23 MR.,SCHUETT: No, 1 believe it_was represented by;_ 24, yes. 25 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: >So -you're saying in these - 302 1 1 1 Conditions of Approval there is a standard that basically they 2 have to develop a comprehensive emergency plan for the 3 facility? Is that what lA is? 4 MR. SCHUETT: No, 1A is the note prior to recording 5 the POD plat a law enforcement authority shall be formed 6 according to state law, the law enforcement authority to be 7 formed shall be capable of expanding to serve other areas 8 within the I-25 Mixed Use Development area to avoid 9 duplication of overhead and other operating expenses, or costs 10 I guess is what it says, operating costs. 11 COMMISSIONER WEBSTER: Are you saying that's a 12 mandatory action we take rather than an optional one by the 13 Commissioners? 14 MR. SCHUETT: What I'm saying is we could 15 incorporate that plat note in this resolution and should, 16 through the review process of establishing that law 17 enforcement authority, if it be determined that it is not 18 necessary, they would not have- to complete the law enforcement 19 authority formation. 20 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: Do they have to develop a 21 comprehensive emergency plan for this facility? 22 MR. SCHUETT: I don't'believe that that is one of 23 the items that we have listed as a plat note prior to 24 recording or as part of this application. However,'I believe' 25 through their contract with the state and the operation of the 303 1 facility that they will have to establish some sort of plan 2 for that, yes.. 3 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: -And who might approve that plan? 4 Would the state approve it or would we have the authority to 5 approve it? 6 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: Could Michael answer that 7 question?. 8 MR. SCHUETT: I. think that would be something that 9 you should probably direct to. the applicant as to howthey are 10 going to form that plan. 11 MR. BRAND: Commissioners, first that would be 12 something that, I'm sorry,. Michael Brand with The Villa. The 13 comprehensive emergency plan is a condition in the RFP that 14 was sent out by. the Department of Corrections. It was also a 15 condition that we clarified, in our response to the RFP. The 16 first approval process .would be from the Department of 17 Corrections. Other people who would have to be involved, 18.. first would be the Weld County Sheriff's Office because they 19 are the primary responding agency to that area in Weld County. 20 And then we would be dealing with contractual services with 21 other law enforcement agencies that would provide mutual aid 22 assistance through the Sheriff. -The Sheriff has to request 23. that and we have to request that because the Sheriff is,always 24. the first call. He doesn't want some otheragency there 25 ..first. That's why the Sheriff has towork out all those 304 1 1 1 20 21 22 23 24 25 What 1 2 3 4 details with us and with the So that is a condition that it's a plat note or not, other law enforcement -agencies. will -be -complied with, whether And if I could add please, I"don't know if I'll have 5 any other opportunity. We don't have any concerns with any of 6 the plat notes as they were outlined.- The discussion that 7 you're having today, the only concern I have would-be on if 8 you want to get into the operationsofthis facility to the 9 point of in a plat note mandating -minimum periods of time: 10 The state has said they are anticipating an average- of 90 11 days. I think that's correct.. I; in a lot of ways, would- 12 love to see that 90 days because the longer people are there 13 the easier it is for us and the more effective we can be 14 What I hate to see is if -you say 90 days, for instance -to have 15 an inmate who gets paroled 75 days hence from the institution, 16 who's coming to our restitution center -not be eligible for 17 this program. It's the operational details I'm concerned 18 about with the minimum stay. If you feel that you need to put 19 a minimum stay in, I would ask that you look -at 30 days or something like that. you're trying to avoid is a the purpose of the program. want that it would lack -effectiveness for some people that otherwise would be eligible and appropriate for the facility. we're trying to avoid and what rapid` turnover that would dilute - We don't want that and you don't that, but we also 'don't want ittobe -such a hinderance 305 Thank you. 2 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: What about the Community 3 Citizens Board? Could they still insure compliance with the 4 Bill and with local restrictions? 5 MR. BRAND:. It's our intention to have a community 6 liaison or community advisory board. i don't have an issue 7 with that being a plat note if you feel it's necessary~ It's 8 ,not normally:something that would be in a. plat note, but it's 9 somethingwe intend to do. This board would not, be an 10 administrative board. - It would not be a board that would 11 determine for .us and for theDepartment,of Corrections the 12 operational issues that we're going to work out in the 13-- contract with -the Department. It would be a liaison board, a 14 , communication board, so that. we ; know if -there's any issues 15_ that -need -to-be addressed in the community. There would also- 16be.a liaison,back to this Commission. on technical issues such 17 as they can review if we -indeed have Level 2 inmates there. 18. They can review the average length of stay and we'11 give them 19 monthly stat reports on number of admissions and any problems and ail that, and they could report those issues, both positive - 21 and negative, back to this commission. 22 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEY£R;_,.So -if you putit on the 23. _plat would you put it maybe under number 1, prior to recording 24 the PUD Plan plat to. develop a community advisory board? ,25_. MR...SCHUETT; Well :I.think it. should,. it you're 306 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 going to locate something like that, it should be prior to 2 operation of the facility because recording of the plat could 3 take place in the near future should this be approved and then 4 the facility built some time in the future. So it could be 5 under a new number 3 that says prior to the operation of the 6 facility. Or it could even be included under number 2 that 7 just states prior to operation of the facility. 8 MR. BRAND: And we would have no concerns with that. 9 We fully intend to do that any way. 10 [UNKNOWN AUDIENCE): May I clarify by definition on 11 this? 12 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: I don't think we're at a position 13 to clarify that, do you? 14 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: I think he stated what it 15 would be. Basically we just have to reiterate what he just 16 said, I don't know if he could do that. 17 MR. BRAND: Sure. 18 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: Okay, that would be good. 19 Why don't you just go into that. 20 MR. BRAND: Our intention is to establish a 21 community liaison committee or a community liaison board for 22 the pre-release center. The purpose of the liaison committee 23 would be to meet with the facility on a regular basis and to. 24 be aware of contractual compliance issues such as level of 25 inmates served, type of program, any of the other plat notes. 307 1 1 They can look at those if•they .want to insure full compliance. 2 They can, at your request, ,I don't think you need to specify 3 this in a note, but they would report back to you on a regular 4 basis. What it would end up being, frankly, would be as John 5 Coppom stated, if there are issues that are being created in 6 the area by the facility we want to know that. Whether it's 7 our staff coming down the gravel roads rather than taking the 8 frontage road or whatever, that's the, kind of thing that we'll 9 hear from them. We'llalso provide the community liaison 10 board with information on number of admissions, type of 11 admission, number of discharges, where the people came from, 12 where they went to and things like that. 13 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: So, there'd be a liaison 14 board that could report to the Commissioners that could like 15 basically advise us to the problems in the area and they would 16 have to insure compliance with the House Bill 90-1327 and any 17 local restrictions? Does that kind of summarize it? 18 COMMISSIONER WEBSTER: Did he say to report to the 19 Commissioners. 20 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: Yeah. 21 MR. BRAND:_ At your request it can say that. 22 COMMISSIONER .WEBSTER: I don't know if that's 23 necessary. 24 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Could we say, Prior to 25 establishing, or . prior to., occupying the facility, the 308 1 1 i 1 1 1 applicant shall establish a community liaison board with 2 duties and criteria approved by the Commissioners? And then I3 we can approve what they're going to do later on? I mean 4 including all those things rather than putting all of that in ' 5 there, you would type up like a set of by-laws or a set of 6 policies or whatever and have us approve them before you 7 occupy the building? That's what I'm saying. Like we do with 8 some of our subdivisions and our covenants and so on, on our 9 subdivisions. 10 COMMISSIONER WEBSTER: Those covenants don't answer 11 to us. 12 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Well, this could. 13 COMMISSIONER WEBSTER: I know, but I don't see the 14 .reasoning behind it. ' 15 MR. MORRISON: I'd hesitate to use the word 'duties' 16 as well because it's clearly going to be, as you presented it, 17 an advisory 18 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Responsibility. 19 COMMISSIONER WEBSTER: It's an advisory board with ' 20 between the community and the facility. And it's a 21 communication type of thing created in order to communicate 22 between the community and the facility and not to be tied back 23. into any type ' of government entity. And that's my ' 24 understanding of what you're getting at. 25 MR. BRAND: It is. But my statement, that I think 309 you're dealing with .is, do .you .want it,- do ,you want 2 information, does this Commission want information back from 3 this community advisory board at any interval you would so 4 desire? 5 COMMISSIONER WEBSTER: No more than I would Hauser 6 Chemical. 7 CHAIRMAN KIRKMEYER: Personally, i think it would be 8 nice at least to get an annual report to find out if they're 9 working together down in that area, if they're actually 10 communicating and the liaison board actually working. 11 COMMISSIONER WEBSTER: I would expect that if 12 they're not, we'll certainly hear about it. 13 CHAIRMAN kirkmeyer: And if they are, we want to 14 hear about it. 15 COMMISSIONER WEBSTER: Okay, if you think it would 16 be nice, 17 MR. BRAND: Well, I would want you to hear the 18 positive things too,.i mean, let's. not assume that this would 19 be negative, that's right. 20 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Well, I would -still like it to 21 leave that -open that we, can .approve whatever, you're 22 disagreeing with me, Lee, I can tell. 23. MR. MORRISON: Well,.I think it would be better to 24 define what it. is they are offeringto do now. If you're 25 going to include such a 310 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 0 1 1 1 1 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: All right, would you put some 2 wordage with it? I mean this took up two pages. 3 COb24ISSIONER KIRKMEYER: No, not really. 4 MR. BRAND: I'm not even a lawyer. 5 MR. MORRISON: I think, you' need to indicate what it 6 is, your goal. Is this to be liaison between the facility and 7 you or is this just, is this -to be a citizen advisory board to 8 the facility in terms -of ' the relationship with the 9 neighborhood? Because I heard two different concepts. One 10 is, you know, what's going on'in the neighborhood that creates 11 problems as a result of the facility; and the other was a 12 broader one of monitoring the compliance county and state 13' regulations. ` 14 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: Well, I'd like to see them 15 be a citizen board that basically, a liaison with the 16' facility. 17 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Between the facility and the 18 community, right? 19 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEY£R:- Un huh. So that they would 20 be aware of any problems. or and positive things that are 21 happening in the community. But I would like to just get a 22 report as to what, even an annual report, just so that we know 23 that it is happening 24 COMMISSIONER WEBSTER: I can easily see an annual 25 ` report to be given by the facility. 311 1 COMMISSIONER KIRXMEYER: No, by this board. 2 COMMISSIONER WEBSTER: By the board? Okay. A joint 3 report. 4 [UNKNOWN AUDIENCE]: Madam Chairman, may I clarify' 5 one issue that you brought up just now? You brought up about 6 the Planning. Commission. 7 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: I'm sorry but you cannot speak at 8 the moment unless you are bringing up something entirely new 9 that has not been discussed before. 10 [UNKNOWN AUDIENCE] : It was a. question by you to 11 your staff and it wasn't fully answered. 12 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Lee, what do I do? 13 MS. MORRISON: You know, if you felt you got the 14 answer, I don't think you don't need to explore the audience 15 further. If you got your answer on .a question of the. staff, 16 I think that's, rather than opening everything up again. 17 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Okay. Did you understand that, 18 ma'am? 19. [UNKNOWN AUDIENCE].: I did, but you didn't get a 20- full.answer. 21 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Apparently the answer that we got 22 was satisfying to -the commissioners. All right, back to this. 23 Does someone have wordage for it? 24 - _ MR. MORRISON: .I.suggest something along the line. 25 that the plat note. will, require creation of a community 312 1 liaison board consisting of members of the neighborhood to 2 deal with issues of the operation impacting the neighborhood 3 and to report at least annually to the Board of County 4 Commissioners. 5 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: I'm satisfied. That would be 6 item 3, Conditions? 7 MR. MORRISON: Actually, it would be part of the 8 plat. 9 MR. SCHUETT: It could be under. number 2 as a note 10 on the plat. Just add it under number 2. 11 COMMISSIONER WEBSTER: I'd concur with staff's 12 recommendations as to the placement of it. 13 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Okay. Do I have a motion? 14 MR. MORRISON: Mr. Schuett made a suggestion that it 15 be, that he'd also note on the plat that the facility is; 16 limited to a Level 1 and 2 classifications. Do you have any 17 objection to that? 18 MR. COPPOM: Absolutely none. 19 MR. SCHUETT: That could be entered into the first 20 item under number and it could read as the uses permitted' 21 within the PUD plan shall be a Class 2 minimum restriction- 22 facility or a Class 1 minimum facility limited to 386 inmate 23 pre-release facility as 'described in the application' 24 materials. There is also another item'that'I brought up about' 25 transferability. 313 1 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: I think that should be 2 added on here. 3 COMMISSIONER BAXTER: Is there any legal problem 4 with that, Lee? 5 MR. MORRISON: Part of the problem with it is we 6 attach those to the kinds of facilities that have .a fairly 7 minimal capital investment such as a dog kennel. And to 8 attach that to this kind of facility, I think presents some 9 greater problems because you've restricted that use, not only 10 the use, but to the current ownership. I think .that makes 11 potentially problems in financing and you know, I don't know 12 what the applicant's comment would be on that, but I do think 13 there's some greater. problems when you've got a greater 14 capital investment than, you know, something of a lesser 15 investment. 16 MR. SCHUETT: Let me throw this, out as far as an 17 idea that it could not be transferred to any other interest or 18 ownership without first being reviewed by the Board of County 19 Commissioners in a public hearing process. 20 MR. MORRISON: In what process? We don't have a 21 process right now for transfer of ownership in a PUD. 22 MR. SCHUETT: We'll take out process and just, 23 indicate in a public hearing. 24 MR. MORRISON: The, only public hearings we have on 25 this are a creation of the plan. 314 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 MR..SCHUETT: Okay, but through other special use 2 permits we have had, such as like the transfer of a 3 certificate of compliance where the individual had to come 4 before the board and the board reviewed the individual's 5 ability to comply with those. 6 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: I think all the restrictions that 7 we put on there would transfer with 8 MR. MORRISON: Well, yes, clearly. 9 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: However, I think some 10 times, part of our decision will be based on the integrity of 11 the experience that this ownership has and that may not 12 transfer. We've had past experiences where the credibility of 13 the other owners isn't as good as -the ones that applied for - 14 it. 15 MR. MORRISON: I think the other, if you do- 16 something like that and seek to restrict the transfer you have 17 to also go into the issue of the ownership of the corporation .18 because the legal entity that you're dealing with is The Villa 19 at Greeley, Incorporated. And so if you talk about 20 restricting transfer you're talking about the facility being 21 sold to someone else and the name disappearing. You also', 22 would have to deal with the issue where someone,- you know 23 conceivably, could take over the corporation or become the 24 shareholders of the -corporation different than these. So it- 25 gets fairly involved. If you're trying to limit it to Michael - 315 1 1 1 1 1 1 MR. SCHUETT: Okay, but through other special use 2 permits we have had, such as like the transfer of a 3 certificate of compliance where the individual had to come 4 before the board and the board reviewed the individual's 5 ability to comply with those. 6 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: I think all the restrictions that 7 we put on there would transfer with 8 MR. MORRISON: Well, yes, clearly. 9 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: However, I think some 10 times, part of our decision will be based on the integrity of 11 the experience that this ownership has and that may not 12 transfer. We've had past experiences where the credibility of 13 the other owners isn't as good as the ones that applied for 14 it. 15 MR. MORRISON: I think the other, if you do 16 something like that and seek to restrict the transfer you have 17 to also go into the issue of the ownership of the corporation ,18 because the legal entity that you're dealing with is The Villa 19 at Greeley, Incorporated. And so if you talk about 20 restricting transfer you're talking about the facility being 21 sold to someone else and the name disappearing. You also 22 would have to deal with the issue where someone, you know 23 conceivably, could take over the corporation or become the 24 shareholders of the corporation different than these. So it 25 gets fairly involved. If you're trying to limit it to Michael 315 Brand and John Coppom, you know, it gets fairly involved. You 2 also do have the issue of financing, and I'm not sure how that 3 would affect the ability to finance it. 4 MR. SCHUETT: I guess this would be a different type 5 of facility than what we've dealt before on special use 6 permits and things like that where there were single entities. 7 I think this would become more, as Lee pointed out, it may not 8 be appropriate. 9 The other item that was brought up was that on plat 10 note A, the Board could locate that individually under item 11 number 2 as a note with this PUD plan indicating that they 12 would have to at least pursue the process of establishing a 13 law enforcement authority as plat note A does indicate and 14 then through that process, should it not be warranted, then it 15 could be dropped at that time. 16 MR. DAHL: Madam Chairman, a question of procedure. 17 Is the Board now negotiating the conditions of the approval of 18 the applicant on the record? I'm just curious what was 19 happening. 20 MR. MORRISON: They're not negotiating. I think 21 they're entitled to find whether the applicant objects to the 22 condition or not. I think that has some relevance in their 23 determination. That was in response to Mr. Dahl's question as 24 to whether the Board was negotiating with the applicant on the 25 terms of the condition. 316 e 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Again, could I have a motion? 2 COMMISSIONER WEBSTER: Madam Chairman, in view of 3 the fact that my colleagues here are hesitant to place this on 4 the, for a motion, I would make some comments and move on a 5 motion. Prior to coming to this hearing, I had a complete 6 open mind as to my thinking on this; even though for the past 7 several months actually, many people of course have been 8 coming up to us, myself as well as others I'm sure, indicating 9 their preference and which way we should see this applicant's 10 situation. But I honestly say that coming into here that I 11 had a complete open mind as to listening to this testimony for 12 the past 12 hours and out of that I've realized that of course 13 one thing that has come about is that our society has made 14 certain demands on our lifestyle. The increase, or not the 15 increase in crime, but the crime situation and the increase in 16 numbers that are being incarcerated in prisons, and the need 17 for prisons and some solution as to how we can rectify this 18 problem to get these people back into the mainstream of 19 society without them having to return back into the prison for 20 having committed another crime. 21 And another thing, of.course, that we all look at 22 and in my mind is that we all live within our idea of "Not in 23 My Backyard" syndrome. It's larger in certain areas of the 24 county and whether it's in a residential area or whether it is,. 25 in a rural area, but it's still that we have that fear of 317 1 something coming in after we, have located our home and finding 2 that we don't like it. Whether it's a landfill, an industrial 3 plant, even agricultural operations that are built that create 4 problems; pollution problems, the dust and air pollution and 5 water and, so forth. .I think, and I commend all of you for 6 your patience here today. You've been very good in listening 7. to all the comments today. You've been very much the ladies 8 and gentlemen that we hoped you'd be and we have listened and 9 we have reasoned and ,we're here today to make the best 10 judgment possible, the best decision possible. 11 It is in my opinion that this facility needs built. 12 I think it needs built for one thing that I talked about 13 earlier in my opening remark in saying that if there's a 14: possible way in order to be able to get people that have 15 committed crimes back in society that have been incarcerated 16 for a period of time, and if some type of training programs 17 and those type of things to accept society and come in, that 18 I think there's a need for. I think it might work. We've 19 tried other things, other things aren't working. And 20 consequently, I firmly believe that, this facility might work. 21 I also feel., in listening to the testimony today and seeing 22 that the locations and the questions that were asked of other 23 facilities throughout the United States; that this location is 24. compatible to; southern Weld County,.: I think it's compatible - 25 to the infrastructure that, is there...: I think that the water, 318 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 the sewer, the electrical and so forth and its location is in 2 the right area. I would have hoped possibly to have had it 3 placed in an area which was not with as many people in the 4 local area as there has been, or the potential that the area 5 will be increased in number of building sites and so' forth in 6 the future, but.1 don't really think that this is going to be 7 the great deterrent that everybody is tearful of. I think 8 the safety and the security needs have been met by these 9 people to the best of their ability and therefore, Madam 10 Chairman, I would vote for, or make a motion for approval of 11 this facility. 12 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Are you including the additions? 13 COMMISSIONER WEBSTER: With the staff's stipulations 14 and recommendations. 15 MR. SCHUETT: Does it include any changes that 16 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: The addition of item 17 COMMISSIONER WEBSTER: I don't know what you 18 numbered those, Keith. 19 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: i believe it's 1, do you have 1C, 20 or you added it under just 1A. 21 COMMISSIONER WEBSTER: lA I think. 22 MR. MORRISON: Yeah, it was added to IA regarding 23 the classification, the allowed uses and 24 MR. SCHUETT: The first item under number 2. 25 COMMISSIONER WEBSTER: Yes. 319 1 MR. SCHUETT: Where it indicates that the uses 2 permitted within the Planned Unit Development shall be a Class 3 2 minimum restricted facility or a Class 1 minimum facility, 4 limited to 386 -inmate pre-release facility, as described in 5 the application materials. 6 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: The second sentence is 7 still on there also? 8 MR. SCHUETT: And the second sentence is still 9 included. And the last item that was added as far as the 10 establishment of the community liaison board as read by Mr. 11 Morrison. And also, the addition, of plat Note A of the 12 Change of Zone. 13 COMMISSIONER WEBSTER: The organization, the liaison 14 group, right. 15 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: And what was the plat note again? 16 MR. SCHUETT: Prior to recording the PUD plan plat, 17 a law enforcement authority shall be formed according to state 18 law, the law enforcement authority to be formed shall be 19 capable of expanding to serve other areas within the 1-25 20 Mixed Use Development area to avoid duplication of overhead 21 and other operating costs. 22 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: I alsothought you were 23 going to add under number 2, that very first one, something 24 about a 30 -day minimum stay? Oh, we didn't agree to that? 25 MR. MORRISON: Now that was discussed. 320 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 COMMISSIONER WEBSTER: It was not discussed. 2 MR. BRAND: Madam Chairman, I have a question on the 3 wording on the 4 MR. MORRISON: There's a motion on the floor, Mr. 5 Brand. 6 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Did you want the 30 -day on there? 7 COMMISSIONER WEBSTER: No. 8 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: Do I have a second? 9 MR. BAXTER: Madam Chairman, I would second the 10 motion and I would also reiterate that I think this has been, 11 no doubt, one of the toughest decisions that we've had to 12 wrestle with and we've come in here with and tried to really 13 listen to what happened, I know we had, we were charged with 14 voting for this unless it did not meet these criteria. And 15 there were some serious questions raised by people in the 16 audience that made us really look at the parts of this. In my 17 mind, this proposal, when you get down and sort it all out, is 18 consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. It is, 19 the Planned Unit Development, conforms to that PUD district 20 which is proposed because of the wording and our 21 interpretation of it and our planning staff and our legal 22 staff has looked at this and I, at least, would take their 23 word on how they feel this wording, what it really says. The 24 uses, building and structures are compatible with existing - 25 development and future development. It does conform, I would 321 1 make the statement, as I looked at it, I don't know if there's 2 any real good word picture to show' how it looks, but I'm sure 3 that if I was to, give me a little indulgence here. If I was 4 to say "snake" to everybody out there in that audience, I'm 5 sure that 90% of you would say that's bad, I don't want 6 anything to do with it. And I, myself just to relate this to 7 a personal thing, I had that same inherent, we each have that 8 inherent fear of things that we don't know anything about. 9 But I have handled a lot of snakes. ,I .know snakes. My kids 10 have handled snakes. I learned what those snakes were about 11 and I would say that that's the same type of principle. It - 12 sounds far afield, but when we get the information about that, 13 we decide whether that is truly, we perceive it to be bad or 14 whether it's really bad. And I don't try to belittle what you 15 think out there. I think you really feel something is that 16 way. I just don't feel like the facts support that. I think 17 that we have to go beyond our initial reactions to what we, to 18' the facts. And I believe it does conform and I would have to 19 vote for it on that, and second it on that, on those facts. 20 CHAIRMAN HARBERT: It's been moved by Bill Webster 21 and seconded by George Baxter to approve the PUD Site Specific_ 22 Development Plan Planned Unit Development for The Villa as 23 presented with the additional conditions of approval and plat 24 plan notes as stated: by staff. Is, there any discussion? - 25 Anything you want to say? 322 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i i 1 1 1 1 2 3 4 s 6 7 8 9 ' 10 it 12 COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: I guess I would just add to that, it has been a very long day for everybody and I did come in here also very skeptical, very critical, and obviously with lot of questions. And I think a lot of my questions tried to get to basically how you would define a pre -parole release facility. And no where could I find it defined as a prison. In fact in the legislation it's defined basically as a rehabilitation training center or area or whatever, and rehabilitation defines, basically, rehabilitating prisoners is also in the definition when I went up and looked it up in my Webster's Dictionary. I think it is consistent with the weld County Comprehensive Plan and that the district is supposed to 13 allow for institutional uses and promotes freedom of ' 14 flexibility. It also allows for all levels of commercial uses ' 15 16 ' 17 18 19 20 21 ' 22 23 24 consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. I would 25 go along with what Barbara just said about definitions. I and I think in my questioning of staff, I would have to concur with them in that the PUD District has been found to be current. And so therefore, I will be voting for it. I think, again, we weren't here to debate the merits of whether or not we believe in pre -parole facilities or release facilities or anything of that nature. We had certain criteria that we had to follow and if we found that they were met, basically we need to be voting for this. MS. HARBERT: I guess I would agree also that it is 323 1 also think that the Planned Unit Development Plan conforms to 2 this PUD District by, and it's substantiated by our Planning 3 and Zoning Ordinances. I, too, feel that it also is 4 consistent with our Planned Unit Development Overlay District 5 in Section 54.1; therefore, I would vote approval of this 6 also. May I•have roll call please. 7 CLERK: George Baxter. 8 COMMISSIONER BAXTER: Aye. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 CLERK: Dale Hall. COMMISSIONER HALL: Yes. CLERK: Barbara Kirkmeyer. COMMISSIONER KIRKMEYER: Yes. CLERK: Bill Webster. COMMISSIONER WEBSTER: Yes. CLERK: Connie Harbert. COMMISSIONER HARBERT: Yes. MS. HARBERT: Therebeing no other business to come before us now, we are adjourned. 324 RESOLUTION RE: APPROVE AMENDMENT #1 CONTRACT FOR HIV COUNSELING AND TESTING WITH COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board has been presented with an Amendment #1 Contract for HIV counseling and testing between Colorado Department of Health and Weld County Health Department, commencing December 1, 1993, with further terms and conditions being as stated in said amendment, and WHEREAS, after review, the Board deems it advisable to approve said amendment, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the Amendment #1 Contract for HIV counseling and testing between Colorado Department of Health and Weld County Health Department be, and hereby is, approved. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that the Chairman be, and hereby is, authorized to sign said amendment. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 8th day of December, A.D., 1993, nunc pro tunc December 1, 1993. ATTEST: Weld County Clerk to the Board BY: (g/c.QP. Deputy Clerk to APP:' AS TO FORM: County Atto ey " Dale. K. 11 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Constance L. Harbert, Chairman gA19 W. Webster, P -Tem I n Glaare: E. Baxte Ha tarbara 3. Kirkmeye Loos CC, HLsn?re 931244 STATE OF COLORADO COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Dedicated to protecting and improving the health and environment of the people of Colorado 4300 Cherry Creek Dr. S. I Laboratory Building Denver, Colorado 80222.1530 4210 E. 11th Avenue Phone: (3031692.2000 Denver, Colorado 80220.3716 I (303) 691-4700 Roy Romer Governor Patricia A Nolan, MD, MPH Executive Director November 23, 1993 Dear Contractor: We are pleased to inform you that we have been able to reprogram funds to supplement your current (1993) HIV counseling and testing contract. Enclosed are four copies of an amendment to your contract which will retroactively augment the reimbursement rate for high/increased risk pretest counseling and testing services. Please sign all four copies and return all four by December 10, 1993. It is critical that the signed amendments are returned by this date in order to allow sufficient time for processing and approval before the contract period and funding availability expire. Please return the signed amendments to: Audrey Christensen DCEED-ADM-A3 Colorado Department of Health 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South Denver CO 80222-1530 A copy of the amendment will be returned to you upon final approval. We appreciate your cooperation and expediency in this matter. If you have any questions, please give me a call at (303) 692-2682. Sincerely, Audrey Christensen Administration Disease Control and Environmental Epidemiology elpe.rrlydrnprr Form bAG02A (R it88) DEPARTMENT OR AGENCY NUMBER 26000 -FAA CONTRACT ROUTING NUMBER 94-1450 Amendment #1 CONTRACT THIS CONTRACT, made this 17th day of November, 1991 by and between the State of Colorado for the use and benefit of the Department of Health, 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South, Denver, Colorado 80222-1530 hereinafter referred to as the State, and Weld County Health Department. 1517 1(Zth Avenue Court. Greeley. CO 80631 hereinafter referred to as the Contractor. WHEREAS, authority exists in the Law and Funds have been budgeted, appropriated and otherwise made available and a sufficient unencumbered balance thereof remains available for payment in Fund Number 100 , APPR code 365 . Contract Encumbrance Number FAA SOD930840; and WHEREAS, the State has formulated comprehensive plans relative to the statewide control of Sexually Transmitted Disease (STD) and Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Infection; and WHEREAS, in order to implement said comprehensive plan, the State and the Disease Control and Environmental Epidemiology Division (DCEED) of the Colorado Department of Health (CDH) has been awarded funding from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC); and WHEREAS, the State has entered into an agreement with the Contractor to provide free and confidential HIV counseling and testing services to high/increased risk individuals; and WHEREAS, the Contractor has been providing said services at a rate which does not provide complete reimbursement for costs incurred; and WHEREAS, authorization has been obtained from CDC to reprogram funding to retroactively augment the reimbursement rate for HIV counseling and testing services for high/increased risk individuals and; WHEREAS, it is the intention of the parties to amend and increase the original contract SOD930840 by Two Thousand Two Hundred Twelve Dollars and Eig tv Cents ($2.212.80) to a new total of Five Thousand Two Hundred Thirty Dollars and Eizhtv Cents ($5.230.89) to provide a service rate increase for HIV pretest counseling and testing services for high/increased risk individuals. P.ge I of 4 Pages 931244 ,r J NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed that for and in consideration of their mutual promises to each other, hereinafter stated, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1) Consideration for this amendment to the original agreement consists of the payments which shall be made pursuant to this agreement and the promises and agreements herein set forth. 2) It is expressly agreed by the parties that this contract is supplemental to the original contract SOD930840, routing number 93-0840, dated January 1, 1993, which is by this reference made a part hereof as Attachment A and all terms, conditions and provisions thereof, unless specifically modified herein, are to apply to this contract as though they were expressly re- written, incorporated and included herein. 3) It is agreed that the original contract SOD930840 between the State of Colorado and the Weld County Health Department, shall be, and is hereby modified, altered, and changed in the following respects only: A. By eliminating and striking out from paragraph 5a. of the original contract SOO930840 the words and figures "Fifteen DollarsJ$15.00)" and substituting instead the words and figures 'Eighteen Dollars and Thirty Cents ($18.30)". B By eliminating and striking out from paragraph 16 of the original contract SOD930840 the words and figures "Three Thousand Eighteen Do11a_r ($3.018.00)" and substituting instead the worth and figures "Five Thousand Two Hundred Thirty Dollars and Eghty Cents ($5.230.80)" C. By eliminating and striking out from paragraph 17a. of the original contract SOD930840 the words and figures "Fifteen Dollars ($15.00)" and substituting instead the words and figures "Eixhteen Dollars and Thirty Cents ($18.30)•. 4) The effective date of this amendment is December 1, 1993. 5) In the event of any conflict, inconsistency, or incongruity between the provisions of this amendment and any of the provisions of the original contract SOD930840 the provisions of this amendment shall in all respects govern and control. No z or 1 Pegs 931244 SPECIAL PROVISIONS CONTROLLER'S APPROVAL 1. This contact shall not be deemed valid until it shall have been approved by the Controller of the State of Colorado or such assistant u he may designate. This prevision is applicable to any contract involving the payment of money by the State. FUND AVAILABILITY 2. Financial obligations of the State of ColoradapaYeble after the current fiscal year are contingent upon funds for that purpose being appropriated. budgeted. and otherwise made available. BOND REQUIREMENT 3. If this contract involves the payment of more than fifty thousand dollars for the construction. erection. repair. maintenance. or improvement of any building. road. bridge, viaduct. tunnel. esavatwn or other public wort for this State. the contractor shall, before entering upon the performance of any such wort included in this contract, duly execute and deliver to the Sure official who will sign the contract, a good and auffitiet bond or other acceptable surety to be approved by said official in a prnel sum not leas than one-half of the total amount payable by the tents of this contract Such bond shall be duly executed by a qualified corporate surety conditioned upon the faithful performance of the contract and in addition, shall provide that if the contractor or his subcontractors fail to duly pay for any labor. materials. team hire, a stenance. provision, provender or other supplies used or consumed by such contractor or his subcontractor in performance of the wort contracted le be done or fails to pay any person who supplies rental machinery, tools. or equipment in the prosecution of the work the aunty will pay the same in an amount not exceeding the sum specified in the bond, together nth intent at the rate of eight pa ant per annum. Unless such bond is executed. delivered and filed, no claim in favor of the contractor ',Wag under such contract shall be audited. allowed a paid, A certified or cashier's check or a bank mosey order payable to the Treasurer of the State of Colorado may be accepted in lieu of a bond. This provision is is compliance with CPS 31-26.106. INDEMNIFICATION 4. To the extent authorized by low, the contractor shall indemnify, save. and hold harmless rte State. its employees and agents. against any and all claims. damages. liability and court awards including costs, expenses, and attorney fees incurred as a result of any act or omission by the contractor. or its employees. agents, subcontractors. or assignees pursuant to the tem, of this contract. DISCRIMINATION AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION 5. The contractor agrees to comply with the letter and spirit of the Colorado Anudiscrimination Act of 1957. as amended. and other applicable law respecting discrimination and unfair employment practices (CRS 2434-W2), and as eequiree. by Executive Order. Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action, dated April 16. 1975. Farman thereto, the following provision shall be contained in all Stair contracts or nib -contracts. During the performance of this contract. the contractor agrees as follows: • (a) The contractor will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, creed. color, national origin. sex. marital status. religion. ancavy. mental or physical handicap, or age. The contracor will take affirmative action to insure that applicants an employed, and that employees tee treated during employment without mud to the above mentioned characteristics. Such action shall include, but not be limbed to the following: employment upgrading, demaa4 or trwfer. sentiment or tomomnen advenninga; layoffs or tmminwonc rates of pay or other foram of compensation: and selection for taining, including apprenticeship. The contractor specs to post in conspicuous places. available to employees and appliants for employment. notices to be provided by the contracting officer setting fond provisions of this non-discrimination clause. (b) The contractor will. in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by a on behalf of the contractor, stale that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment Without regard to race, need, color, national origin sex. mantel scour. religion. aaecstry, mental or physical handicap. or age. (c) The contractor will send to each labor union or representative of worker with which he has a collective bargaining apoement or other contract or understanding, notice to be provided by the contracting officer. advising the labor union or workers' representative of the contractor's commitment under the Executive Order, Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action. dated April 16. 1975. and of the rules, regulations, and relevant Orders of the Governor. (d) The contractor and labor unions will famish all information and reports required by Executive Order, Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action of April 16, 1975, and by the rules. regulations and Orders of the Governor, or pursuant thereto. and will permit access to his books. records, and arcoums by the contracting agency and the office of the Creamer or his designee for purposes of investigation to aseatain compliance with such tales, regulations and orders. (e) A labor organization will riot exclude any individual otherwise qualified from full membership rights in such labor organization. or expel any such individual from membership in such labor organization or discriminate against any of its members in the full enjoyment of work opportrairy because of sate. creed. color. sex. national origin, or ancestry. (f) A labor organization. or the employees or members thereof will not aid. abet, incite. compel or coerce the doing of any act defined in this contract to be discriminatory or obstruct or prevent any person from complying with the provisions of this contract or any order issued thereunder. or attempt, either directly or indirectly. to commit any act defined in this contact to be discriminatory. Form 6 -AC -02B Revised 1/93 355.53-01.1022 page 3 of 4 paM 931244 (g) In the event of the contractor's non-compliance with the nondiscrimination clauses of this contract or with any of such rules. regulations, or orders. this contract may be canceled. terminated or suspended in whole or in pan and the contractor may be declared ineligible for further State contract in accordance with procedures, authorized in Executive Order, Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action of April 16. 1975 and the ruts. regulations, or orders promulgated in accordance therewith, and such other sanctions as may be imposed end remedies as may be invoked as provided in Executive Order. Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action of April 16, 1975. or by rues, regulations, or orders promulgated in accordance therewith- or as otherwise provided by law. (h) The contractor will include the provisions of paragraphs (a) through (b) in every subcontract and subcontractor purchase order unless exempted by riles. regulations. or order issued pursuant to Executive Order. Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action of April I6. 1971. so that such provisions will be binding upon each subcontractor or vendor, The contractor will take such action with respect to any subcontracting or purchase order as the contracting agency may direct, as a means of enforcing such provisions. including sanctions for non-compliance; provided. however. that in the event the contractor becomes involved in. or is threatened with. litigation, with the subcontractor orvendor a a result of such direction by the cOntracting agency, the contractor may request the State of Colorado to enter into such litigation to protect the Merest of the Sate of Colorado. COLORADO LABOR PREFERENCE 6a. Provisions of CRS 8-17401 at 102 for preference of Colorado labor an applicable to this contact if public works within the State are undertaken hereunder and an financed in whole or in pan by State funds. b. When a construction contract for a public project is to be awarded to a bidder. a roaidem bidder shill be allowed a preference against a non-resident bidder from a state or foreign country equal to the preference given or required by the state or foreign country in which the non-resident bidder is a resident. If it is determined by the officer responsible for awarding the bid that compliance with this subsection .06 may came denial of federal funds which would otherwise be available or would otherwise be inconsistent with requirements of Federal law. this subsection shall be suspended, bin only so the tan ntatuary to Provost denial M the moneys or to eliminate the inconsistency with Federal requirement (CRS 8.19-101 and 102) GENERAL 7. The laws of the State of Colorado and rules and regulations iuued putsdant thereto shall be applied in the interprnation, aecvrion. and enforcement of this contract. Any provision of this contract whether or not incorporated brain by reference which provides for arbitration by say extra -judicial body or person or which is othewise in conflict with said laws, ales. and regulations shall be considered null and void. Noshing contained in any provision incorporated herein by reference which purports to negate this or any ether special provision in whole or in penman be valid orenforceable a evadable in any acute at law whether by way of complaint. defence. ororherwise. Any provision rendered null and void by the operation of this provision will not invalidate the reminder of this contract to the extent that the contact is capable of execution. 8. At all times during the performance of this contract, the Contactor shall strictly adhere to all applicable federal and sate laws, ales, and regulations that have been or may hereafter be established. 9. The algnments aver that they an familiar with CRS 15-8.301. et. seq.. (Bribery and that no violation of such provisions is present. and Corrupt Influences) and CRS 18.8401. et. seq., (Abuse of Public Offset). 10. The signatories aver that to their knowledge. no state employee hiss any personal or beneficial interest whomever in the service or property described herein: IN WITNESS WHEREOF. the parties hereto have executed this Contract on the day first above written, Conractor: Weld County Health Department (Full Legal Name) Weld County, Colorado 13o d of County Commissiongss Constance L. Harbert Position (title) Chairman • 846000:13 B It Corporation:) Attest (Seal By ATTORNEY GE By Fenn 6 -AC -02C Rained I/93 )n.53-ei-tare Board Page 4 which is the last of STATE OF COLORADO ROY ROMER, GOVERNOR By •s DEPARTMENT HEALTH OF WELD COUNTS REALER DEPARTMENT S. Pickle ctor CON7RO ROVALS: STATE C.ONTROElER CLIFFQfp 4 BYpans II111/�e APPROVALS By 'Sea lanniCOOds on Inverse side. PROGRAM APPROVAL for its 401244 ' ATTACHMENT A Perm 6ACd2A (R I/6Er DEPARTMENT OR AGENCY NUMBER 26000 -FAA CONTRACT ROUTING NUMBER 930840 CONTRACT THIS CONTRACT, made this 1st day of January, 199x, by and between the State of Colorado for the use and benefit of the Department of Health, 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South, Denver, Colorado 80222-1530 hereinafter referred to as the State, and Weld County Health T)enartment. 1517 16th Avenue court Greeley: GO 80631 hereinafter referred to as the contractor. WHEREAS, authority exists in the Law and Funds have been budgeted, appropriated and otherwise made available and a sufficient unencumbered balance thereof remains available for payment in Fund Number 100 , APPR code 365 , Contract Encumbrance Number FAA SOD930840; and WHEREAS, the State has formulated comprehensive plans relative to the statewide control of Sexually Transmitted Dicnce'(STD) and Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Infection; and WHEREAS, in order to implement said comprehensive plan, the State has established provisions by which to provide supplementary support to various local health departments and community based service organizations; and WHEREAS, the Contractor, a County Health Department, is considered by the State to be an appropriate agency to provide the services as herein set forth, • NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed that for and in consideration of their mutual promises to each other, hereinafter stated, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. The Contractor agrees to provide confidential counseling and testing services for antibody to HIV; a. Funds will support two basic types of testing programs, Provider Initiated testing and Patient Initiated testing. Provider Initiated testing will consist of testing at facilities that provide routine risk accrcement and ongoing medical care (family planning clinics, STD clinics, etc.). Patient Initiated testing consists of testing at Counseling and Testing Sites (crs) where clients go to receive HIV testing services only; Page l or9 Pages. 2. The Contractor agrees that counseling and testing services for each individual will include the following: a) the administration of an approved informed consent, (sample attached and by this reference made part hereof as Attachments A and B), b) a risk assessment, c) a discussion and development of a risk reduction plan for the client, d) drawing blood sample for laboratory processing, e) transportation of blood to laboratory, 1) informing clients in person of test results, g) explaining the significance of both positive and negative test results to the client, h) referring clients who test positive for follow-up medical and counseling services as appropriate, i) ensuring that all clients who test HIV positive receive posttest counseling, j) ensuring that those positive clients who do not return for results or are lost for follow-up are referral to the Colorado Department of Health and k) ensuring that all positive clients are referred to Disease Intervention Specialists for sex and needle share partner referral; 3. The Contractor agrees that reimbursement for testing services will be based on service, units. A pretest counseling session is considered one service unit; a posttest counseling session is considered another service unit; 4. The Contractor further agrees that reimbursement will also be based on client risk. "High/increased risk" clients have a history since 1978 or since their last valid negative test as reported by the client, of one or more of the following: I) injection drug use, 2) sex with a person with HIV/AIDS, 3) sex with a man who has sex with men, 4) sex with an injection drug user, 5) more than three sex partners in the last year, 6) an STD, 7) receiving money or drugs for sex. Persons with low/no risk are those individuals who have received blood or blood products between 1978 and 1986 and who report no history of the above listed risks; a. Valid negative test is defined as a negative test done six months or more after the client's last reported unsafe behavior. 5. For Provider Initiate (non -CTS, family planning clinics, sit clinics etc.) and Patient Jnitiated testing the following standards apply: a. Contractor will be reimbursed at a rate of fifteen dollars ($15.00) per pretest service unit for high/increased risk clients as defined in this contract. b. Contractor will be reimbursed at a rate of five dollars ($5.00) per posttest service unit for high/increased risk clients as defined in this contract. c. Contractor may choose to charge clients as outlined in paragraph seven of this contract; 6. For CTS only, Contractor agreesto separate personal identifiers from risk/demographic information listed on. the HIV laboratory report form in such.a manner as to make re -linking impossible. This separation will occur within sixty days of testing; Pao 2 of 9 Pau 931244 7. Contractors may (but are not required to) charge clients. Contractors choosing to collect fees may do so by the method they find most convenient (sliding scale, flat administrative fee, donation, etc.). A fee waiver is left to the Contractor's discretion. Clients who are referred by the Colorado Department of Health as sex/needle share partners of HIV infected persons will not be denied services because of inability to pay; 8. The Contractor agrees to provide to the State an annual report of fees collected within thirty days of the end of the contract period. Fees collected plus contract reimbursement for services provided should not exceed an annual average of fifteen dollars ($15.00) per service unit; 9. All counselors providing counseling and testing services must have successfully completed the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) course "I-IIV Serologic Test Counseling" or an approved equivalent. All counselors providing ten or more pre or posttest counseling sessions per calendar quarter (every 4 months) are required to attend one State approved HD/ Counselor Update per year. Those Contractors which do not have any counselors providing ten or more pre or posttest counseling sessions per calendar quarter are required to have a minimum of one counselor per year attend a State approved HIV Counselor Update; 10. The Contractor agrees to maintain internal medical and administrative records (labslips, counseling session notes) in a manner which ensures confidentiality and security and is consistent with procedures for clinical services; 11. Contractors shall designate an HD/ Counseling and Testing Coordinator and provide the name of this person, as well as the name of al employees providing counseling and testing services, to the State within thirty days of the effective date of this_contract. The Coordinator will serve as the contact person with State staff to resolve operational issues. Such issues will include but not be limited to: laboratory report form completion, billing and reimbursement, counselor training, evaluation and modification of counseling services; 12. All counselors providing counseling and testing must be evaluated annually by the HIV Coordinator or his/her designee with an evaluation instrument provided by the State. Copies of completed evaluations will be submitted to the State; 13. The Contractor agrees to fully and legibly complete for each person tested the HIV 1 Serology lab slip. All lab slips must specify the source of the client services (where they were tested) along with the provider. Specific codes used to indicate the source of the client services are as follows: Source CTS STD FP Pro 3 or'? Pave code 0214 ' 0114 1213 931244 14, The Contractor further agrees, for each client posttest counseled, to fully and legibly complete the lower perforated portion. (Counseling Follow-up form) of the provider copy (top white copy) of the HIV 1 Serology lab slip provided by the State. The completed Counseling Follow-up forms shall be submitted to the State within forty-five days after the date of pretest counseling. If a clients returns for posttest counseling more than 30 days after their pretest, the Contractor will not be eligible for reimbursement for that posttest counseling session. The State shall provide to the Contractor a monthly Testing Site Activity Report within sixty days following the end of the month; 15. The State shall provide free laboratory services, regardless of risk, for all persons accepting HIV antibody testing; 16. The State will, in consideration of all servicesoutlined in this contract, cause to be paid to the Contractor a sum not to excer.-. $3.01$.00 (Three Thousand Eighteen Dollars1 for the period beginning January 1, 1993, and continuing through December 31, 1993, subject to change based upon differences between estimated and actual funding appropriations and legislative approval, and conditioned upon affirmation by the State that services were rendered in accordance with this contract as follows: a. The State will provide a monthly statement of reimbursement eligibility by the eleventh working day of the end of the month for which reimbursementis to be provided. These monthly statements will reflect the number of pretest and posttest counseling wssions (service units) eligible for reimbursement during that month. The Contractor will have seven working days in which to verify these statements by signature or inform the State of any discrepancies; 17. The following budget shall govern the expenditure of funds by the Contractor, as well as subsequent reimbursement by the State: a Pretest counseling for all persons with high/increased risk accepting HIV antibody testing at the CED clinic at fifteen dollars ($15.00) per service unit. b. Posttest counseling for all persons with high/increased risk accepting HIV antibody testing at the.CHO clinic at five dollars ($5.00) per service unit. c. A base amount of $400.00 will be provided for testing site operation. 18. Payment pursuant to this contract will be made as earned, in whole or in part from available State funds encumbered not to exceed $3,263 (Three-Million-Five-Hundred- $eventy-Four-Thousand_'wo-Hundred-Sixty-Three Dollars) for the purchase of AIDS prevention services. It is further understood and agreed that the maximum amount available for the purchase of AIDS prevention services is $3.574.263 t -Three -Million -Five -Hundred -Seventy -Four - Thousand Two-Hundred-Sixtv-Three Dollars) or such lesser amount as may be mandated by Para 4 of 9 Pala ,C• "cn '.,.r.� 921244 executive order -or legislative action. The liability of the State, at any time, shall be limited to the unencumbered remaining in such funds; 19. The term of this contract is beginning January 1, 1993, and continuing through December 31, 1993; 20. Changes in total reimbursement amounts for above named services in consideration of increased or decreased levels of utilization in the original contract shall be made by a mutually signed Letter of Approval which shall include the following: a. Identification of contract by contract number and number of affected paragraph; b. Amount of increase or decrease in funding and amount of change in number of clients to be served; c. Effective date of funding change; d. Authorized signatures of the Contractor, the Program, the Health Department and the State Controller. It is understood that no change except funding amounts and the resulting change in client numbers, may be made through the Letter of Approval. My other changes will be made by an amendment to this contract; 21. The State and Contractor agree that additional funds may be awarded to expand or extend activities. Should such funds become available, they will be awarded by an amendment to this contract. Pogo 5 o 9 Ping ise 931244 .'COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEAL . - hereinafter, under the Genet .'Health". Provisions referred to as GENERAL PROVISIONS -- page 1 of 2 pages 1. The contractor shall perform its duties hereunder as an independent contractor and not as an employee. Neither the contractor nor any agent or employee of the contractor shall be or shall be deemed.to be an agent or employee of the state, Contractor shall pay when due all reoui_ted emolovmenc taxes and income tax vichho_1dinc shall provide and ee ce w e ! om a and ow o0 o h 'n u a e and une vme� compensackon_ insurance in the amounts required -by law. Contractor will be -solely responsible for its acts and the acts of its agents, employees, servants and subcontractors during the performance of this contract. 2. Contractor authorizes Health, or its agents, to perform audits and co make inspections for the purpose of evaluating performance under this contract. 3. Eicher party shall have the right to terminate this agreement by giving the other parry thirty days notice by registered.mail. return receipt requested. If notice is so given, this agreement shall terminate on the expiration of the thirty days, and the liability of the parties hereunder for the further performance of the terms of this agreement shall thereupon cease, but the parties shall not be relieved of the duty co perform their obligations up to the dace of termination. 4. This agreement is intended as the Complete integration of all understandings between the parties. No prior or contemporaneous addition, deletion, or ocher amendment hereto shall have any force or effect whatsoever., unless embodied herein in writing. No subsequent novation, renewal, addition, deletion, or other amendment hereto shall have any force or effect unless embodied in a written contract executed and approved, pursuant to the State Fiscal Rules. 5. If this contract involves the expenditure of federal funds, this contract is contingent upon continued availability of federal funds for payment pursuant co the terms of this agreement. Contractor also agrees to fulfill the requirements of: a) Office of Management and Budget Circulars A-87, A-21 or A-122, and A-102 or A-110, 'whichever is applicable; b) the Hatch Ace (5 USC 1501.1508) and Public Lay 95-454 Section 4728. These statutes state that federal funds cannot be used for partisan political purposes of any kind by any person or organization involved in the administration of federally -assisted programs; c) the Davis -Bacon Act (40 Stac 276A -276A-5). This act requires chat contractors or sub -contractors to work on assistance must be paid wages not less projectby the Secretary of'labor; . 1494, Mar. 3, 1921, Chap. 411. 40 USC all laborers and and mechanics employed by construction projects financed by federal than those established for the locality of the d) 42 USC 6101 et seq. 42 USC 2000d, 29 USC 794, These acts require chat no person shall, on the grounds of race, color, national origin, age, or handicap, be excluded from participation in or be subjected to discrimination in any program or, activity funded, in whole or in part, by federal funds; and Page 6 ,of Pages Rey. 06/01/92 a e- 931944 • GENERAL PAPAS e) the 12111 - 12117, and 47 USC 225 IONS -:Page 2 of 2 pages Americans with Disabilities Act (Public Law 101-336; 42 USC 12101, 12102. 12131 - 12134, 12141 - 12150, 12161 - 12165, 12181 - 12189,'12201 12213 and 47 USC 611. • f) if the contractor •is acquiring real property and displacing households or businesses in the performance of this contract, the contractor is in compliance with the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies. Act, as amended (Public Law 91-646, as amended and Public Law 100-17, 101 Scat. 246 - 256); g) when applicable, the contractor is in compliance with the provisions of the Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments (Common Rule). 6. By signing and submitting this contract the contractor states that: a) the contractor is in compliance with the requirements of. the Drug -Free Workplace Act (Public Law 100-690 Title V, Subtitle D. 41 USC 701 ec seq.); b) the contractor is not presently debarred, suspended, proposed fordebarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from covered transactions by any federal department or agency. 7. To be considered for payment, billings for payment pursuant co this contract must be received within 60 days after the period for which payment is being requested- and final billings on the contract must be received by Health within 60 days after the end of the contract term. 8. If applicable, Local Match is to be submitted on the monthly payment statements, in the column provided, as required by the funding source. 9. If Contractor receives $25,000.00 or more per year in federal funds in the aggregate from Health. Contractor agrees to have an annual audit, by an independent certified public accountant, which meets the requirements of Office of Management and Budget Circular A-128 or A-133, whichever applies. If Contractor is required to submit an annual indirect cost proposal to Health for review and approval, Contractor's auditor will audit the proposal in accordance with the requirements of OMB Circular A-87, A-21 or A-122. Contractor agrees ca furnish one copy of the audit reports co the Health Department Accounting Office within 30 days of their issuance, but not later than nine months after the end of Contractor's fiscal year. Contractor agrees to take appropriate corrective action within six months of the report's issuance in instances of noncompliance with federal laws and regulations. Contractor agrees to permit Health or its agents to have access to its records and financial statements as necessary, and further agrees to retain such records and financial statements for a period of three years after the dace of issuance of the audit report. - This contract does A p contain federal funds as of the dace it is signed. This requirement is in addition to any other audit requirements• contained in ocher paragraphs within this contract. - 10. Contractor agrees to not use federal funds to, satisfy federal cost _sharing and matching requirements unless approved4n writing by the appropriate federal agency. Page 7 of 9 Pages aex.s. 9l/03/92 93124 Form bAC.02S C0.`afoLLER•$ APPROVAL SPECLaI. PROVISIONS 1. This eontraa shall ea be teemed valid until is shall have been approverby the Controllerafthe Stare of Colorado orsuc: amistarlt as he: may • eesignate_T_s provision is applicable co any contract involving the payment of money by the State. fl av rtaarzrtr Fuuncal obligations of the State payable after the current fsscal year are condngee woe funds for that purpose being sppropnacd, budgeted arid oe„e.-.-_e made available. - 'SOND REQUIREMENT 3. If this contract involves the payment amen: than fifty thousand tartars for the construction. :O:0. Sndge.viaduct. fennel. eacavauon or Other public works (orthu �awng the ci otmacc.oany ZUCrmeirs =aided lGz accurate. duly execute aracriverw State. appears ears beiO r forth Sc m cawing :the Der.`ormaha o! any suCayaprk and file with the aTiwlwhoaesipsansreaoparsodor lortheSratagoodaadsuafcenc =aided approved by sad od1cial a a pmal sun not less than one-half of:he :oral amount payable by the termsbald nd stag be azly crteae S :e qualified corporate surety,;,ondioonet for the due and ravioli' of tn. all ovide Such roam rcr his ecconca a fail to duly pay for any labor. materials. team artosi ns.?MW"ner OO and ip9jjn 3 pceconsumed by nick OaU2c Art Sbcaet- ce hire.ssureohce, payca.na,pnanirorLxhcrsupeSi used the sum spe fiebysuet eed, cgtnerwsuacc.j car performance of the wont contracted to be done. the surety will pay me same inananoutnocesceedin[thesumspeenedinthebend,A terestu•=r rate oenght per eta per mown. Wilms such bond. when so =Mired. is eaeevcad, delivered and aid nth: shad be audited allowed orprrd. A =reflector cashier's cheek on bank more the eQassurer nheStaeottavoreithe oion4 acme-Mrrdin.raof- bona This provision is a amotiance with 38-26.106 CRS. as amended, % order payee's TressursroftheStaieplG,alpndpmaybeaat;cedin:!r.ofd C DESLYIFTC,3zON a. To the Malt atWerued by law. the contractor shall indemnify. Save sad hold humlc,ss the State. tat employees and sgtha, against any std art damages. liabdicv and court awards including asts, expense, and atomey (era incurred as a result of any as or omsszion by the thnoaear.,x as mtptpver. agents, suoconPaaors. or assignees puma= to the terms of this cencac_ DISCRLIIINATION :UM AFFIRMATIVE ACTION 5, The contractor agrees :a empty with the letter _,' rn,,,.,.yrv.. sad soiree of the GobraeoAmdiscimidadod.� of I9:7, as is n ma trier coicyment practices12444-47- " 2, CPS 1982 Reotacentenf Vol.).mended. nab Committal appoapte !cow ra.C.=:- cveAcaon,:acecA41nndas lateEseauear :,?^usirc s Apni 1 b, :975. Penman thereto. rnr%ollow•irtg�roririant snail Cr contained in all State conOpportunity :act �-` Dunn; merrttctt or raoxanoccat performance of this anaacL the cVna'7aor agrees as follows: (I) The Contractor wail net disCralljnan against any employee or applicant for emp oyment because of race. =cc. color. aapoiut oneji, Sea, =,ritad status, falcon, angry derpaysicalhandicap,drage. The epnv c', w,jltakeu6raauveaetioneoinstateantappiicantsate=toyed.aMclatcnaioyees;sr eaten miring empioy.meat. without regard to the:cove mentioned charac•;aisae Such aeon shad include. bat tot be limited -O the (ol ow.inc ramioyme`_ orating.. ,:notion. or t-nster, tccrw or recuicment adyetainc!ay.ot'sor:ermine:am= eta of tray or cute (ems of compensation: sac se!rsn_c: caning. useuaing aeore:c»sntp. The contracwrlatal Ia post inconspicuous ptaec,avadable to employees asddepilates for capiavmcu aodCYda %lar@ by the fontnr• :g officer sang forth provisions of this hOM1taC:Lmthatjpn Cane, j_) The contrac:brwtil. a ail solicaaponsoradverusana s forenployce ojacd by or on behalfofthe conaXThmstate tau al(quaiitiepamiantus will rr.;ve' :ansaoenuon for emptoyrtent without regard to race. Coen- color. national an9a, sex- marital datus, religtdy nasty. _teat or papa= hantca,. age. • t3 The cant-ctorw,d arc to each labor union or rcensemauve of wort= withVer she has collecivebargaiaingaprcmncoromermntrnaornnemm en- t:g, :once to Ce crevice: av the cohtncwag offcer. =lasing the lam* anon Or wpr ' representative a the contracar's commtmentunce the aaec':,:ve Oreer. S:7taa Ooponuntty and Arfinaadve Action. aced Apni 16, 1975, and of the rules. regulations, and relna t Orden of the Governor.. •der The contractor and lacerunons will furnish alinfonnauonanis reports regnin tby Zxcsanive Order, Equal .�s�� :975. area by the asses:ration and Orders ofthe Gavenor. orpursuam thereto, yen willOeats. moandMmnaune bytrie tatunc:=. agency and ate odic: C ( Lie Curernoe or his dagnee (or purposca of inyau main access to his ban su n rubes and aecnums is Qtca„nL-ar,--- gstroe u ascenan ampaiance woo such rtua. zSujaaoas ,spa oreers.. v St A laoor organization wail not excludeany.andivutual ttnenwse qualifeo from full membership rights in aura labororgan .some, or expel any sun =lot= from nemnocnmp in soc=coo organaanon Or el:etaneae against any olio meaneen in the nab ed)w,men& of work sex. actin ought Or ancestry, oDDortumry, beeauuaraa. _ r6) A labor organization, al' the employees or mermen dlercoiwaif not a:0. abet, incite, Compel Or Cavite the dans tie am act defined in chit gnpy, tp _ :,:memory or ooscNC der :rcven( any pea (mm:complying with the provtsipm7 0(tea cowl= Or ny Order isaued in0+tealy, :0 commit Inv ate, defined in -e 3 this mndracx to be disesrnrna[orv...... • _ thercurrae.^. Jrdt attempt nine arc=near • :95.32•)1;0:2 Rev ,st l I SS :age . S di pages F rr.r_-mss Foca 6- AC -22C (7) In the eveato(the conpaczet eoo.comptiaaca with the non-diu�thes es ug on=cons,etor or tin. hay ofmch rolea.nttulmoef. oeorekm. this '. wna'act nay be caaallot toroom red or sutpaded in whore or in part and the etc sr —or say be dedaard inelipb4 far Mrte State cooa-acs in aerordutc with pr ceaure, =named in Exeemve Order. Equal Opportunity and A(irmative Acoao(April 16.1975 and the Ma. reyr+l=s. or otters promulcuee is accordance therewith. and such mast =ohms as :beg be imposed and remedies as yyle Soiled as providcd'a Elective Order. Equal Qpporauuty aan A tnaanve Acion of And 16. 197$, or by mks. repiluioas, or ores ptoamlpxad in accordance therewith. or a cant. provided by Law. (3) The cucserIna tac^.nde the provisions o(pelgmh(1) through (8)inevery nunanarus and sabaactrac-or 7mt'n order unless ampted by tries. repilatom or olden issued punuau to Executive Order. Equal Oppotmorty and ,ld:ccatiw Acacia of April 16.1973,3o asssach provisions vin be binding pose each subraeerar or wooer. The nes or wit take sod aGCra with repo:Canny any sub-Camraeong or our ....are order ore the contracting agile-/ coy direct as a means o(out; noch ptovisioos including sanctions for non--mmp'aacc provided however- that in an eves the txmeaexr biomes involved in. or is threatened with.:Itigacen with the subcoarraeor orveodnras a renal cid=acloa by the motrarrng apRey. the contrae.ormay request the Stare of Calondo to eater coo such litigation to pious: the intenst of the. Sam of. Colorado. COLORADO LABOR PRE. ERE 4CE 6a. Provisions of 8474014 102. CPZ for prdavc o(Caccndo labor are applierM e this contact lipubSe •eorn'within the Saxe an undertakenbarua- es and are financed a mole or in put by State &mss. S. When nmt. _a ate= :or a public peojea is to be awarded to a bidder. a aid= bidder :hail be alloyed a prceroce against a aoowaide tt bidder from a state or fora^..3•^,y:goat co the preference given or required by the sun ortretto country in weich the:wo-erdrat biker is a Mid= If itisarc- coined by use orrice=rowans for awarding the bid dux =nspiiance with this ts cod.06 may cause neural o(fede ral feat= nett .andother.ce be ami- able or would =come oe=oasis,... with requir'Ann of We= subsea@sisail be auapmdt. bid ally to the areaneztaary to Fence deia( of the moneys or m denims me 'xcda4xtency with federal tquireme= (seecon 8.19.101 sod 102 CZS). GENERAL 7. The Laws of the State of Calondo and tales and mutedons issued punt= thatvo shah be applied is the =err:aim action sad enrbrammtoi cis contra= Any peovuian of this =uric wberher or tux incorporuad berm by rein= witch provides foe weirs= by any csaa-jadiaal bogy or person or - oniGi is macrons* In =arc ett said laws ruin ado replanow shell be cou9de eo cud aad void. Notting cotton= in any n'oton Sarooraul barn by re ermee welch purports to =Ate this or any other apecat provuioa in wrote ce in perm= be valid or esiotcaale or avadaale in any a=m at laws wearer �. way of o rams. dame oromar.xse. Anyprovision rcdcrd null and vodby the opczoon ofthis provision Aril norinvalidga tie rtmaiaderofthis case the cues that the = = i =mole or' ace 3. Ax an dma dust; 0 -to ^arbrmance of this Cuter. the Cani-arasbasI scatty -v' et to ail appliab4 (eon and sore Laws, ,:la and rtgdadoat'?..ax Save Saes or ray Sevarr as cuelisnaa. 9. The amaacarr .%ct aye= tncy see ocular Aim 18-3-;01, sc sm„3nbery:ra Curios lmluec.3rism 134-:01.= sena(Abuse of ?attic OM= r. CRS 1973 Repucadea Vol- and max co violation of tun name= is presem. 10. The sic:atonee aver =At LO :her :mowteage, ao ante auptoyee bas a ,ream or benia:.i iateest •.eapoever a the uric :f prooer.T dccbec ( 'NL;: fE=5 `HHE3LOF. _e paean hereto have executed tail Caw= on zee :.rut are %s pa (F•adL.cgiNuma) Weld Councy Health Dept STArzorcotOMOC ROY ROMER. GOVERNOR Wer]Z County Board of Commissioners /`// 01/271.93 Position (Mai Chili erne 8460008138 Of Carporatiomi Amci (5eai1 >pRHx5tga6Nr—une o Board ATTORNEY GENEW. GALE A. NNOORTON. e % Z' A97 nFie.' Assisidlti Auuua:y Gi neral General Legal Services ny 4 _ ecumE otec:oe, ^EP.cATMENT OF "EAL_ VELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPART242tT. •.. Hy: Randolph rdoa, M.D., ?LP .1i. Director APPROVALS I CLIFFORD w. ALL tar 'PRCG4:.:+ .APPROVAL: No. 9 +se.. w ..r • a ..... 931244 Al IAL.it` e.NI A, • Colorado Department of Health HIV Antibody Pretest Information The HIV Antibody Test and AIDS The test that you are about to have is a test. for. the HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus) antibody. HIV is the virus which cart cause AIDS. AIDS (acquired immunodeficiency syndrome) is a serious disease that is caused when HIV damages a part of the body's immune system (its natural defenses). This makes it difficult for the body to fight off other diseases. It is not known whether everyone infected with the virus will develop AIDS. Some people have had the virus for many years without becoming sick. Even though these people are healthy, they can passthe,virus to others through sex or shared needles. A woman infected with HIV can pass the virus to her baby during pregnancy. Anyone who has the virus can pass it on. The HIV antibody test is a simple blood test. When someone is infected with the virus, the body makes a kind of protein called antibody. It will take at least one month or as long as six months after infection for the antibodies to appear. If the test finds antibody in your blood, this means you have the virus and can pass it on. The results of this test are very good. However, no test is 00% correct. If you think your results are wrong, please request a repeat test. This test cannot tellyouwhether you have AIDS or if you will develop AIDS. In order to do the test for HIV, about a tablespoon of blood will be taken from your arm with a sterile needle. As. a result of this procedure. you may experience some - temporary discomfort and bruising. Reasons You May Want to Take This Test HIV infection is an important medical problem. If you have the virus you need to know. You will want to learn about healthcare measures that may help you stay healthy and keep from developing AIDS. If you find out you have the virus, you will want to tell your sex partner(s) or people you have shared needles with so they can get tested too. You will need to learn about "safer sex" and other ways to protect your partner's health and to keep yourself from becoming exposed again. If you find out you do not have the virus. your counselor will discuss ways to avoid getting HIV, the virus that causes AIDS. Reasons You May Not Want to Take This Test Finding out that you have the virus (HIV) can be upsetting. You might become worried about developing AIDS. or infecting others. For this reason it is important to consider who in your life- is available to talk to and help you when you receive your results. Also, there are counselors, volunteers and support groups to help you with these feelings. (over) MAt n q. s� �n e•. �Z 931;.44 A A „•h..1.'1G.r 1 0' Colorado Department of Health HIV Antibody Pretest Information The HIV Antibody Test and AIDS The test that you are about to have is a test for the HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus) antibody. HIV is the virus which can cause AIDS. AIDS (acquired immunodeficiency syndrome) is a serious disease that is caused when HIV damages a part of the body's immune system (its naturaidefenses). This makes it difficult for the body to fight off other diseases. It is lot known whether everyone infected with the virus will develop AIDS. Some people have had the virus for many years without becoming sick. Even though these people are healthy, they can pass the virus to others through sex or shared needles. A woman infected with HIV can pass the virus to her baby during pregnancy. Anyone who has the virus can pass it on. The HIV antibody test is a simple blood test. When someone is infected with the virus, the body makes a kind of protein called antibody. It will take at least one month or as long as six months after infection for the antibodies to appear. If the test finds antibody in your blood, this means you have the virus and can pass it on. The results of this test are very good. However, no test is 100% correct. If you think your results are wrong, please request a repeat test. This test cannot tell you whether you have AIDS or if you will develop AIDS. In order to do the test for HIV, about a tablespoon of blood will be taken from your arm with a sterile needle. As a result of this procedure, you may experience some temporary discomfort and bruising. Reasons You May Want to Take This Test HIV infection is an important medical problem. If you have the virus you need to know. You will want to learn about healthcare measures that may help you stay healthy and keep from developing AIDS. If you find out you have the virus. you will want to tell your sex partner(s) or people you have snared needles with so they can get tested too. You will need to leam about "safer sex" and other ways to protect your partner's health and to keep yourself from becoming excosao again. If you find out you do not have the virus, your counselor will discuss ways to avoid getting HIV, the virus that causes AIDS. Reasons You May Not Want to Take This Test Finding out that you have the virus (I - V) can be upsetting. You might become worried about developing AIDS or infecting others. For this reason it is important to consider who in your life is available to talkto•and help you when you receive your results. Also, there are counselors, volunteers and support groups to help you with these feelings. (over) .♦♦.e�,,/C. {.. -• 9�'�� rte. kr 931244 4411, COLORADO mEmoR'AnDum Constance L. Harbert, Chairman to Board of County Commissioners Date December 3, 1993 From John Pickle, Director, Weld County Health Department Subject: H.I.V. Contract Amendment The attached contract amendment from Colorado Department of Health is due to an increase in the number of high risk individuals being treated at our agency. The per test payment has been increased retroactively from $15.00 to $18.30. This increases our total 93-94 H.T.V. testing and counseling contract by $2,212.00. We would appreciate your approval of this amendment. We are under a timeline of 12/10/93 to return the signed contract to Colorado Department of Health. Thank you. 931244 RESOLUTION RE: APPROVE APPOINTMENT OF JOHN ROCHA TO WELD COUNTY PLACEMENT ALTERNATIVES COMMISSION WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County. Colorado, and WHEREAS, a vacancy currently exists on the Weld County Placement Alternatives Commission, and WHEREAS, it has been recommended that John Rocha be appointed to said commission, to replace Juan Cruz as a lay community representative, and WHEREAS, the Board deems it advisable to appoint John Rocha to said commission, with his term to expire December 31, 1996. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that John Rocha be, and hereby is, appointed to the Weld County Placement Alternatives Commission, with his term to expire December 31. 1996. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 8th day of December, A.D., 1993. ATTEST: Weld County Clerk to the Board Led' Deputy Clerk to the Boar4 APPROVED ;S TO FORM: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO fierfusa- Constance L. Harbert, chairman (JIMIdArtM Webster,/P/r, -Teemm Se�E. BaxtiEr my Attorney Hall tkJ4rJ /��1�yA/L 1 Barbara J. Kirkmey r ec ; a4: Ss; APPr4) 931245 RESOLUTION RE: APPROVE CONVERSION OF CERTAIN FOUND PROPERTY AND EVIDENCE FOR USE BY SHERIFF'S OFFICE WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County. Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Sheriff has presented to the Board a list of found property and property collected as evidence, and WHEREAS, the Sheriff has requested the conversion of said property for use by the Weld County Sheriff's Office, said property being more fully described in the attached Exhibit "A", a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and WHEREAS, the Board deems it advisable to approve the conversion and allow said property and evidence to be used by the Weld County Sheriff's Office. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the abovementioned property and evidence be, and hereby is, approved for conversion to be used by the Weld County Sheriff's Office. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 8th day of December, A.D., 1993. / L Weld County t� d ATTEST: APPROVEDTO FORM: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Barbara J. Kirkmeder S0;AC. 931248 GREELEY OFFICE 910 10TH AVENUE GREELEY, CO 80631 PHONE (303) 3564015 FAX (303) 3536551 C' E;'(f TO TV: :V';J ED JORDAN December 3, 1993 Connie Harbert, Chairperson Board of County commissioners 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 FORT LUPTON SUB STATION P.O. BOX 123 FORT LUPTON, CO 80621 PHONE (303) 3564015 EXT. 4690 (303) 8574465 Dear Commissioner Harbert, I am hereby requesting the Board of County Commissioners, pursuant to Ordinance 28, Section 11, approve conversion of the following items of found property and evidence for use by the Weld County Sheriff's Office. BRAND ITEM(S) SERIAL I) MODEL Jennings .22 LR Gun 187204 J-22 Beretta .22 Gun C67932N 948 Smith & Wesson 9mm Gun A11,9354< 6904 H & R .410 Shotgun 18095 Handy Gun Jason Binoculars None 211F Tasco Binoculars None Zip 2000 The .22 caliber guns and the .410 shotgun will be used by the firearms training officers in the course of their training. The 9mm S&W will be issued to the Weld County Drug Task Force for use in their operation. The two binoculars will be assigned to operations to further their duties. Sincerely. ED JO SHER WELD✓COUNTY 931248 RESOLUTION RE: GRANT BUILDING PERMIT TO DON AND LEIGH A. KOLDEWAY WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 15.1 of the Weld County Subdivision Ordinance, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, is authorized to issue building permits for construction on land divided in an illegal manner, and WHEREAS, it has come to the attention of the Board of County Commissioners that the issuance of a building permit is justified on the following described real estate, to wit: Part of the Se NE} of Section 9, Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that a building permit be issued on the above described parcel of land for the following reasons: 1. The parcel is accessible from an existing pubic road. 2. The parcel has access to an adequate water supply. Left Hand Water District has conditionally approved a water tap for the property. 3. The parcel has access to an adequate means for the disposal of sewage. 4. The issuance of this building permit will not change the essential character of the neighborhood. 5. The procedure defined in Section 15.3 of the Weld County Subdivision Ordinance is not being utilized for the purpose of evading the requirements and intent of the Weld County Subdivision Regulations. 6. The owner does not own a parcel of land adjacent to the subject parcel. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that this approval is conditional upon the understanding that any additional building permit applications on this parcel of land will require the same review by the Board of County Commissioners subject to the requirements of Section 15.3 of the Weld County Subdivision Ordinance, and that the issuance of this building permit is not in any way intended to excuse or absolve the violation of the Weld County Subdivision Ordinance in this case, but is merely intended to relieve the burden of the purchasers of said property. 931251 cc. PL; /4 -/'PC. RE: BUILDING PERMIT - KOLDEWAY PAGE 2 The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted ATTEST: Weld County Clerk to the Board BY4t,41-4�r Deputy Cler to the Boar APPROYtD. AS TO FORM: by ^ he f ol lowing ote/I pn the 8th day of December, A.D., 1993. 'I ll�/ ase4nBOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WEL COUNTY, COLORADO Constance L. Haber, Chairman .1414 ster, Pro- em eorge ac Baxte Barbara J. Kirkme er 931251 WFIiYC oil vg COLORADO December 8, 1993 Board of County Commissioners 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303)3534345. EXT. 3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 1400 N. 17TH AVENUE GREELEY, COLORADO S0631 Subject: Request for a building permit on a 4.24 acre, more or less, parcel of land divided in an illegal manner subject to review under Section 15.3 of the Weld County Subdivision Ordinance. Dear Commissioners; This request for a building permit is submitted by Don and Leigh A. Koldeway. The parcel of land on which this request is made is described as part of the S2 NE4 of Section 9, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. The property is located south of State Highway 119 and west of Weld County Road 7. The Koldeway family purchased a 10.35 acres, more or less, parcel of ground, which was created by a deed recorded in December, 1973. The parcel was illegally divided from a larger property adjacent to the west. A deeded access road has since legally divided the Koldeway parcel into two lots, 4.24 acres, more or less, and 6.11 acres, more or less. The approval of RE -1475 (February, 1993) brought the 6.11 acre parcel lying south of the access road into compliance with the County Subdivision Ordinance. The illegal status of the 4.24 acre parcel lying north of the access road has never been resolved, however, because the owner of the larger parcel from which it was divided is unwilling to cooperate in requesting a Recorded Exemption. Mr. and Mrs. Koldeway wish to establish a residence at this location. In conjunction with this request, a Mobile Home Zoning Permit application and a Flood Hazard Development Permit application have been submitted for review by the Department of Planning Services' staff. 9312 s1 Don and Leigh Koldeway December 8, 1993 Page 2 The Department of Planning Services' staff recommends that this request be approved for the following reasons: 1. The parcel is accessible from an existing public road. 2. The parcel will have access to a water supply. Left Hand Water District has conditionally approved a water tap for the property. 3. The parcel will have access to an adequate means for sewage disposal. The Weld County Health Department has no conflict with this request. 4. Issuance of the building permit will not change the essential character of the neighborhood. Since the 1960's residential uses have existed on the property; the structures included one house and two mobile homes permitted for accessory to farm use in a dairy operation. According to the County's Comprehensive Plan, this 4.24 acre site is designated for low density residential (LDR) land use within the I-25 Mixed -Use Development (MUD) area. 5. The procedure defined in Section 15.3 of the Weld County Subdivision Ordinance is not being utilized for the purpose of evading the requirements and intent of the Weld County Subdivision ordinance. 6. The applicants, who have a contract to buy the property, do not own a parcel of land adjacent to the subject parcel. The Department of Planning Services' staff's recommendation is conditional upon the understanding that any additional building permit applications on this parcel of land will require the same review by the Board of County Commissioners subject to the requirements of Section 15.3 of the Weld County Subdivision Ordinance, and that the issuance of this building permit is not in any way intended to excuse or absolve the violation of the Weld County Subdivision Ordinance in this case, but is merely intended to relieve the burden of the purchasers of the property. Respectfully submitted, lor a Dunn C rent Planner GD/sfr 931251 FIELD CHECK DATE OF INSPECTION: December 1, 1993 APPLICANT'S NAME: Don and Leigh Koldeway REQUEST: Building permit for illegal parcel. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the S2 NE4 of Section 9, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: West of Weld County Road 7 and south of State Highway 119. LAND USE: N Pond, residence E Weld County Road 7, pasture, residence, agricultural outbuildings S access road, residence, pond W Temperature Processing Co., Inc. facility ZONING: COMMENTS: N A (Agricultural) E A (Agricultural) S A (Agricultural) W 1-3 (Industrial) and A (Agricultural) Access to the site is from Weld County Road 7, a paved road. Existing on the property are four old farm structures. An old barn is directly north of the access, but site distance seems to be fine. The surrounding area has a number of reclaimed gravel mines. There are S or more residences within 1/4 of a mile. Gloria Curren 931251 '50 N s A9l/� Jmuum 17 -, ' 2 \8970 O .1u rwrel Pit J •� 11.%x.. j 4670 Ron (16►. 15 ._.<.�. f 16 '+ 4882 7n BM 754827 REFERRAL LIST NAME: Don and Leigh A. Koldeway REFERRALS SENT: November 5, 1993 C9UNTY Attorney Health Department Extension Service _Emergency Management Office Sheriff's Office _Engineering Housing Authority `Airport Authority 'Building Inspection REFERRALS TO BE RECEIVED BY:.November 19, 1993 ,STATE Division of Water Resources Geological Survey Department of Health ^Department of Transportation _Historical Society Water Conservation Board Oil and Gas Conservation Commission FIRE DISTRICTS yAult F-1 Berthoud F-2 �Briggsdale F-24 Brighton F-3 Eaton F-4 Fort Lupton F-5 �Galeton F-6 _Hudson F-7 _Johnstown F-8 _La Salle F-9 _Mountain View F-10 Milliken F-11 _Nunn F-12 Pawnee F-22 Platteville F-13 Platte Valley F-14 -`Poudre Valley F-15 `Raymer F-2 Southeast Weld F-16 ^r Windsor/Severance F-17 Wiggins F-18 __Western Hills F-20 OTHER Central Colo. Water Conservancy Dist. _Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. X Tri-Area Planning Commission TOWNS and CITIES Ault Brighton _Broomfield _Damon Eaton Erie Evans Firestone Fort Lupton _Frederick `Garden City `Gilcrest Greeley _Grover Hudson _Johnstown Keenesburg Kersey La Salle _Lochbuie _Longmont Mead Milliken New Raymer �Northglenn Nunn Pierce Platteville Severance _Thornton Windsor COUNTIES Adams _Boulder �Lorimer FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES _US Army Corps of Engineers r` USDA -APHIS Veterinary Service _Federal Aviation Administration _Federal Communication Commission SOIL CONSERVATION DISTRICTS _Brighton _Fort Collins Greeley Longmont �- West Adams COMMISSION/BOARQ MEMBER 931251 COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303)353-3845, EXT. 3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 1400 N. 17TH AVENUE GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 November 5, 1993 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from Don and Leigh A. Koldeway for a building permit for an illegal parcel. The parcel of land is described as part of the S2 NE4 of Section 9, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is west of Weld County Road 7 and south of State Highway 119. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by November 19, 1993, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Gloria Dunn, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: 3. We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Signed: Agency: Date: 91251 mEmoRAnDum To From Subject: Gloria Dunn Flawing Dcanl4 rarrtil1 4 � Dete.,Jjpypmbnr 17 1QQ7 I have visited the site on WCR 7 just south of State Highway 119 in the Del Camino area. I have drove in and looked around the facility located where the proposed new structure home would be located. My only concern with this site is the existing shed next to the existing access. The shed is 2' to 4' off the property line, possibly causing a visual problem to the north as the applicant pulls out of the driveway. I'have looked at the area north of the shed as a possible access, but there is a gas facility at that location presently which scraps that location. This has been an existing access probably for years. I'm not sure if the same people are replacing the home that are living there presently and are used to the access or if they are new people building on the location that would not be used to the access. For the record, this is a heavy haul truck route used by Western Mobile and C & M to transport gravel and asphalt north to State Highway 119. Checking my records, my average daily traffic count..s 1,448 on this particular stretch. cc: Commissioner Baxter File MHZP-146 mgloria8.pds Weldeogrgypinning 9:1251 WII'k COLORADO r„\,, ' 111 1, _f .5 .1"I I 0 €ios 4; I ``1t►,v` L 4 1 November 5, 1993 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303)353-3845, EXT. 3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 1400 N. 17TH AVENUE GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 Enclosed is an application from Don and Leigh A. Koldeway for a building permit for an illegal parcel. The parcel of land is described as part of the S2 NE4 of Section 9, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is west of Weld County Road 7 and south of State Highway 119. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by November 19, 1993, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Gloria Dunn, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. 2. 3. / We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: Please refer to the enclosed letter. Signed % Agency: Date: c/ID 931251 COLORADO 081101 November 5, 1993 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: zoo- qc. DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303)353-3345, EXT. 3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 1400 N. 17TH AVENUE GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 Enclosed...is"•an--application from Don and Leigh A.Koldeway"for a bufldins permit for an,ill®gal4arcel. -•;The..-parcel`0rland' is described as.part' of'the-S2 NE4"'of Section 9,.T2N,'R68W of the 6th P.M. Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is west of Weld County Road 7 and south of State Highway 119. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will, ensure_-.prompt..consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by November 19 1993,:so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call GloriaDunn,C,urrent-Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: 3. / We have reviewed the request and f`_-' -- " t "' - --------- ----- --- —tatalesees‘ 1tt'1F= 1'fl CrY•t "rceca 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Please refer Signed: s -C/rlsslLfa? Date: IMO �R"� Weld Comfy Planing stiF4D WUk. COLORADO November 30, 1993 Don and Leigh A. Koldeway 1637 Weld County Road 8 Berthoud, CO 80513 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303) w1:434.8, EXT. 3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 1400 N. 17TH AVENUE. GREELEY. COLORADO 80631 Subject: Request for a building permit on an illegal parcel described as part of the S2 NE4 of Section 9, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. Dear Mr. and Mrs. Koldeway: I have scheduled a meeting with the Board of County Commissioners on Wednesday, December 8, 1993, at 9:00 a.m. to consider your application. This meeting will take place in the County Commissioners' Hearing Room, first floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado. It is recommended that you or a representative be in attendance to answer any questions the Board of County Commissioners might have with respect to your application. The Department of Planning Services' staff will make a recommendation concerning this application to the Board of County Commissioners. It is the responsibility of the applicant to call the Department of Planning Services' office a few days before the date of the Commissioners' hearing to obtain the recommendation. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to call me. Respectfully, a Dunn ent Planner GD/sfr, 931251 Intat wilve. COLORADO November 5, 1993 • • DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303) 3533845, EXT. 3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 1400 N. 17TH AVENUE GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 Don and Leigh Koldeway 1637 Weld County Road 8 Berthoud, CO 80513 Subject: Request for a building permit on an illegal parcel in the S2 NE4 of Section 9, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. Dear Mr. and Mrs. Koldeway: Your submitted application is complete and in order and will be processed within 30 days. The staff will gather comments for referral agencies and prepare a recommendation for the Board of County Commissioners. The staff will consider whether your request meets approved criteria as stated in Section 15.3 of the Weld County Subdivision. I will inform you of the Board of County Commission hearing date prior to the hearing. The Board will then consider your application and make a decision on the proposal. It is the policy of Weld County to refer an application of this nature to any town or municipality lying within three miles of the property in question or if the property under consideration is located within the comprehensive planning area of a town or municipality. Therefore, our office has forwarded a copy of the submitted materials to the Longmont and Tri-Area Planning Commissions for their review and comments. It is recommended that you and/or a representative be in attendance at the Longmont and Tri-Area Planning Commission meetings to answer any questions the Commission members may have with respect to your application. Please call Brad School (Longmont), at 651-8330 and Jay Curtis (Tri-Area), at 833-3819, for further details regarding the dates, times, and places of these meetings. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please call me. Sincerely, a Dunn ent Planner 931251 Anai; '"DC. COLORADO October 27, 1993 Mr. Don Koldeway 1637 West County Road 8 Berthoud, CO 80513 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303) 363.a45. Dcr. 3640 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 1400 N. 17m AVENUE GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 Subject: Illegal parcel in the S2 NE4 of Section 9, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. Dear Mr. Koldeway: The Board of County Commissioners has agreed to consider a request from you under Section 15.3 of the Weld County Subdivision Ordinance. I have enclosed a copy for your review and use. The request, if you decide to proceed will be considered in a public meeting. There is currently no application fee for this process. I would suggest that you call and schedule an appointment with Gloria Dunn, Current Planner, to discuss the information you will need to submit to the Board. Sincerely, VNv� Chuck Cunliffe, AICP Director pc: Board of County Commissioners Enclosure 931251 SECTION 15: VIOLATIONS AND PENALTIES 15.1 Any subdivider. or agent of a subdivider, who transfers or sells or agrees to sell or offers to sell any subdivided land before a final plat for such subdivided land has been approved by the Board and recorded or filed in the office of the County Clerk and Recorder shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be subject to a fine not to _exceed five,hundred_ dollars, for .each parcel or interest subdivided- land ' whieh"-is"sold—or. offered' for. sale. All fines- ' collected shall be credited to the general fund of the County. 15.2 The Board shall have the power to bring an action to enjoin any subdivider from selling, agreeing to sell, or offering to sell subdivided land before a final plat for such subdivided land has been approved by the Board. 15.3 Building permits for construction on land divided in an illegal manner subsequent to the adoption of this Ordinance shall not be issued unless reviewed and approved by the Board. No building permit shall be approved by the Board unless all of the following 'can be shown: . 15.3.1 The parcel shall be accessible from an existing public road; 15.3.2 The parcel will have access to an adequate water supply; 15.3.3 The parcel will have access to an adequate means for the disposal of sewage; 15.3.4 The issuance of the building permit will not change the essential character of the neighborhood; 15.3.5 The procedure defined in this Section is not being utilized for the purpose of evading the requirements and intent of the Weld County Subdivision Ordinance; and 15.3.6 The owner does not own a parcel of land adjacent to the subject parcel. 88 921251 • November 2, 1993 SUBJECT: Illegal parcel in the S2 NE4 of Section 9, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. This letter and attached articles is for a request under section 15.3 of the Weld County Subdivision Ordinance. Per 15.3.1 Please find attached a Plot Plan showing access from an existing public road (Weld County Rd. 7). Per 15.3.2 Please find attached a letter of commitment from Left Hand Water District granting our tap request. Per .15.3.3 Please find attached a septic permit for an existing septic system, obtained from the Health Department. Per 15.3.4 The property and modular home will be used as a principal dwelling and the home is to be a replacement for one lost to fire. We have completed and are ready to submit a Manufactured Home Zoning Permit which contains the required number of signatures of property owners within 500 feet. Per 15.3.5 Due to the fact that we have been unable to complete a Recorded Exemption for the subject property, we are asking for this hearing. A Recorded Exemption was prepared, but we were unable to obtain the signature of the property owner of the rest of the section due to the fact that he wants to subdivide the remaining land without waiting the required 5 years. The subject property is already a separate piece of land, owned by Joan and Vern Koldeway. Per 15.3.6 Please find attached a copy of the deed and a Purchase Contract for the 4.24 acre portion of the deeded property. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, -I-� f Leigh . Koldewayrj-- 92125'1 • s"8.1+ OP AM4) C aJ s Tz. 455ao --a (fi)(.: sr) -5071- lc :TANK* (so 26.Y^° 0 Plot Plan for parcel in E4 NEQ it E} SE+ Sec 9 T2N ROW ;field Co. CO. for Don Koldewav, 1637 'MICR 8E Berthoud • L o � 04859 c 7&,cc ( P4z)ee No oR - - ,Ci�zAl �1r4p 24 m at ttitimili;, ,, t. DO „. y i r, f�ter, ' i 0871 ti k E"ti '`�": a to tti6...5 r / y,�.7'�a r� r ad Artv Pz �c cooCL ‘426--j/5G t y ..e1/72s: i- 6...5 ,r�sz ��v S c¢L r /'�, s —o, 931251 NANO DISTRICT • September 7, 1993 Post Office Box 210, NiwSO 80544-0210 (303) 652-2188, Metro (303) 443-2036 Mr. Don Koldeway 1637 County Road 8E Berthoud, CO 80513 Re: Ek NE' Ek SE; Setion 9, Township 2 North Range 68 West TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: The property located at the above legal description is within the "Service Area" of Left Hand Water District. When all conditions and requirements are met, water service would be available to the above stated area. This entitles one living unit to receive water service at this location. There is a specific time period for completion of the tap. Failure to comply to any of the conditions within the stated time period would cause the request for water service to be void. Sincerely, ames M. Dickey General Manager /rr 931251 APPLICATION S INDIVIDUAL .SEWAGE .DIS&AL SYSTEM WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES 1510 Hospital Road, Greeley, CO 00031 o n 3030010 EXT. 270 OWNS -44 5J o U�� -- ADDRESS ADDR OF PROPOSED SYSTEM LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SITE: PT lam'?«' 7 cQ tiL2cE SUBDIVISION LOT' ` USE TYPE: RESIDENTIAL � INSTITUTION _ COMMERCIAL OTHER _ _ r_ NO.' New Repair — .0yt'¢�;rJelt'f bp. revues PHONE 724 BLOCK_ FILING _ SERVICES: PERSONS BATHROOMS/.LOT SIZE BEDROOMS r 1::i j'JrQSEMENT Pe .•MBINr� ' u WATER SUPPLY� TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL REQUESTED: 1 t. K Applicant acknowledges thathe completenessooft is a appplldatlo'nlllnns""��''conditional upon further mandatory and additional tests- and reports u may be required by the Weld County Health Department to be made and furnished by the applicant or by the — Weld COunty Health Department for purposes of the evaluation of the application; and the issuance of the permit is subject. to such terms and conditions as deemed necessary to insure compliance with rules and regulations adopted under Article 10, Title 25, CRS 1973: as amended. The applicant certifies that the proposed system will not be located within 400 feet of a car►- munitysewagesystem. The undersigned hereby certifies that all statements made, Information and reports submitted here- - with and required to be submitted by the applicant are, or will be, represented to be true and correct to the best of my knowl- edge and belief, and are designed to be rend on by the Weld County Health Department in evaluating the same for purposes of issuing the permit applied for herein. I further understand that any falsification or misrepresentation may result in the denial _ of the application or revocation of any permit granted based upon said application lrain legal action -for perjury as provided by law. -. '— need fr � 1! �lSigners lo.Dat. Rsc'tl ern -14\ .�. Date lP-/6 4-1 , Owner/Agent 8lgnat�fy� Dates •-• ♦ **.t • • •.•.• * • • • • • • • • • •. • *• • • • • ***t** ♦ • •,• ♦ ♦ ere'.. FOR DEPT.,nit PERCOLATION RATE % O WATER TABLE DE - USE ONLY F (a 4il 4d SOIL TYPF 57.7- .4, L4�-.. � PERCENT GROUND SLOPESaas O a5 v"c¢ letREQUIRESENGINEER'bESION ( ) YES fl No INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE. DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT From the application information supplied and the on site soli percolation data, the following minimum installation specifi- cations are required: �� /�/ Rae-e�p�trEPTICTANK RA GALLONS, ABSORPTION TRENC SO. FT, 'A. or /t ABSORPTION BED�3 B SQ. FT. V In addition, this Permit is subject to the following additional terms and conditions: , be`d.aso ttr/,' c tad_f-e-jd(e,,.a.n .6er_t-,�'Otte tyrsic,mod �s-teeci,'e-d(. This Permit is grantedlemporarily to allow construction to commence. This Permit may be revoked or suspended by thrM eld County Health Department for reasons set forth In the Weld County Individual Sewage Disposal System Regulations, including failure to meet any term or condition imposed thereon during temporary 9r final approval. The Issuance of this Permit does not constitute assumption by the Department or Its employees !flit j)li fall or! o/ the rMp+OG Waft E I mental Specialist ;07.2.Date This Permit is not transferrable end shall become void If system construction has not commenced within one year of Its Issuance. Before issuing final approval of this Penult the Weld County Health Department reserves the right to impose additional terms and conditions required to meet our regulations on a continuing ba31e. Final Permit approval is contingent upon the final in. 'notion of the completed system by the Weld County Health Department. SYSTEM CONTRACTOR FINAL INSP SYSTEM ENGINEER APPROVAL T � Envlro mental J Mist O/4"/C2./ The Issuance of this Permit don not imply compliance with other state, county or regulatory or building requirements, nor shall it act to certify that the subject system will operate in compliance with applicable state, county and local regulations adopted pursuant to Article 10, Title 25, CRS 1913, as amended, except for the purposes of establishing final approval of an Installed system for issuance of a local occupancy permit pursuant to CRS 1973 25.10.111 (2). 0rlglnai.Applicant; Copy.WCHD O: 31z51WCH0—EHS Febrrwy,1981 i v. • 7 L J / d - sta,si., 6.14/tee r. /tt.ss.�-t�tlj';,...d i` At cac a7`f� At a..::j �a� ,wa.a L75- wee.17 , sa a' y,...c t (in }o✓/ �t ""t c/" ' - r' T/ v AZ.dee-4....P—ar O//ltr5 a6tyc- `. t s✓ rR 4 7e1.e 17 ; 74 nrs a /n.eea 'S J/�r 2' A0 tr.. _ ("AA - .7 '17;rnc Ci trs.'- .. a 3:- /-fat _ter fx L.. Nor T S- eca. fre: (4.s• r Heise fa., h/C:17-ce r a4o.Q 3 cC J H// J r 7 I I 92125 II II 11 •lf i claw;, irn •Clly AR22425J5 Mae n 1 RFC 0229252u 06/19/9:: 14;40 F 06 MARY ANN FEULASTEIN CLERK i '.tECO1;DUR WELD CO, CO .00 1/001 QUIT CLAIM DEED !; THIS DEED. Mak lhi. rawdm 70ly .M June beat Arthur Folderoy, ea Trustoe Ora 'Curry d tanner Case. pwaa.l. and Joan Kolderay and vernon E. Kolde-,ay .rbw kW araa. isII of the Carry of Weld ~^~ II ii rdd SlarCaendo, parts& I WITNES5am Thai the ;R.e.a(eh, tor sad is co ai reliva dtlr hall of ! • W momp IS sddcaacydof which Um DOllars and ether ry Valuable OQrlQaratian— 'i der peas do Y lodled.eV raiW. aimed. sold iI rmke. rkw. r0 ad WlrCLW ache pma.\a4ft.rdg I borer, W lee lyi. Ws, Saw, aWa sad demand which the Paar(yierIm s a .d r Sr ad v�sesalm loll. II iapromaear. Wry. rum. IyiladSadidr Caarrd f'fdeAy, clear sr C hn*. ascribed r follows: 11k112 rd5ard 1I II .iv92. sod Sur of jj I The ofe Worthen Ouait O11/1), the South self (Rrt) (!'✓2) of the as e thrtheast Charter4) (a14) of seer ctiHeld co Nine (9). In TdeNhlp TIC (2) Notch, of Paws Sixty- eight (68) that of the 6th PA. 4' Awls as by rem sod rowdier: 10465 MILS G71elq' Aped 17 ll arywl NAVZ AND TONOLOdr .reoo scald al wad*lerr M aylraho eaplrls Sew rep pew w. bead rd braidteo r •lrer>W �ayracd4lrrrdN.rrrle.reel* r,� rTu VIRUS* Teryaa.t.1 w7r0 drAW.. Mdlll lr ;;crass 1' STATE OF COWlano. II Caryl Lila. n.1.7r }- II g Teel°'°/olierawrrk raaeYdWdbfrrsW ,v l& Ile of i s...s g F)n 14 raT LtA.1s .wy Myearnksya eons MA.) 'Al . NV, , airs; SI ► od and Warr sal. Na f)), li r 441. d m 17AM4 air irderm..a s,IN/raw r. sir...,/so sal-.IS*MVnr. eV 'adp\Oi •r II 311e c fit 4 931251 �I !l • i! I; The printed parolees of this fore) approved ppas� the Colorado Reel Estate Commission (CBSSC.1J9) THIS IS A LEGAL INSTRUMENT. IF NOT UNDERSTOOD, LEGAL, TAX OR OTHER COUNSEL SHOULD BE CONSULTED BEFORE SIGNSQ, VACANT LAND/FARM AND RANCH CONTRACT TO BUY AND SELL REAL ESTATE Seller's remedy Liquidated Damages or Specific Performance (Section 16) (FINANCING SECTIONS OMITTED) A. i(i k -7 t9 93 I. PARTIES AND PROPERTY. Ronald .T. and Leh At . Koldeway • plrchaserp) IPurchaserj, (asjotnttenon s/lenants in Cornrow)) agrees to buy. and the tmdersiitngt leller(s)(Seller],agrees to sell, on the terms andconditiions set forth in thiscontract. the following described r:aleswo 11 in roe County of Web a • Colorado. towig N��4 4 E t�z. 5E 4 Sex 9.111-21•1 RCS W known as No. vAeC3 COLS nt i t'd. 7 Longmont. co. 80504- (Simir Address. nay. . Lai together with all interest of Seller in vacated streets and alleys adjacent thereto, all easermasand other appurtenances thereto, all improvements thereon and all attached fixtures thereon, except as herein excluded, and called the Ptopeny. 2. INCLUSIONS. The purchase price includes the following items (a) if attached to the Property on the date &this contract lighting, heating, plumbing,ventilating, and air conditioning fixtures, TV antennas. wafer softeners, an kNfueiburglaralarms. security devices, inside telephone wiring and connecting blocks/jacks. plants, mirror. floor coverings, intenvn systems. bu111-in kitchen appliances, and sprlaklersysaems andc000v&s;(b) if on the Property whether attached or not on the date of this contract buih.ln vacuum systems (including .ca sories), storm windows. storm doors, window and porch shades, awnings, blinds, screens, curtain rods, drapery rods, fireplace inserts, fireplace screens. fireplace grates, heating stoves, storage sheds, all keys and garage door openers including temnteeuntmls; and (c) exist 0s -Fencifg and out...Illdlrss (d) Niter Rights. Purchase pia to include the following water rights: II N/a (el Growing Crops. With respect to the growing crops Seller and Purchaser agree as follows: N/A The above -described included items (Inclusions) are to be conveyed to Purchaser by Seller by bill cissk. /A deed deed or other applicable legal instruments) at the closing, free and clearof all taxes, liens and encumbrances, except as provided in section 10. The following attached fixtures an excluded from this sale: N/A 3. PURCHASE PRICE AND TERMS. The purchsse price shill be $ 25 C:0O- oo . payable in U.S. dollars by Purchaser as follows (complete the applicable terms below): 11 Dice, payable to and held by account on behalf ()thrill Seller and Purchaser. St is authorized tdeli deliver the •my, atoibc e. ! mosey to roe agent[, if airy, atom bcfare closing. (b)Casb at Closing. S26 000-00 to be paid by Purchaser at closing in cash, electronic transferfunds. certified cheek. savings and lour teller's check, or cashier's check . Subject tote provisions auction 4, iftheexisting loan balance at dretime o(elosingshall bedifferent from the loan balance in section 3, the adjustment shall be crude in cash at closing orpaid as follows. (a) Firmtaresey. II 1 N/ in the form of . asearnest money depoint and cart (eymonofroe purchase 4. FINANCING CONDITIONS AND OBLIGATIONS. FINANCING TERMS, CONDITIONS AND OBLIGATIONS, PERTAINING TO SECIONS 3 AND 4, ARE ATTACHFDBY REAL ESTATECOMMISSION APPAOYFD ADDENDUM AS FOLI.O% S: (check as applicable) i I K New Loan I❑ Assumption 0 Seller or Private Third -party Financing S. GOOD FUNDS. All payments required at closing shell be made in funds which comply with all applicable Colorado laws. 6. NOT ASSIGNABLE. This contract shall not be assignable by Purchaser without Seller's prior written consent. Except as so restricted, this contract shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the heirs, personal representatives, successors god assigns of the parties. v3-. K. No. CBSjC.449• VACANT lAND/FARM AND RANCH CONTRACT TO IVY AND SILL RRAI,ESTATE (FINANCING SECTIONS OMITTED) Bradford hbtithing ,111) %zee St.. Denver. CO50202—(30))392.2300—a.q0 921251 7. EVIDENCE OF TITLE. Seller shall furnish to Purchaser stSedler% expellee, abet waurentcommitment for amentide insurance policy es j an amount equal to the purchase price or at SelleYchoice. an abstract ofdna:tiled Macerated'' on a bone ." ember 19 q a_ Hanle insurance commitment is furnished, Purchaser may require of Seller that copies d insu'ummu (or abstracts of instruments) i listed in the schedule of exceptions (Exceptions) le the toe nun= commitment also be finished to Ruthann Seller% aapaue. This requirement shall pertain only to instruments shown of record in the office of the clerk and recorder of the designated county a counties. The title insurance commitment. together with any copies or abstracts of matnun s furnished natant to this section 7, coastline the tide documents Clue Documents). Purchaser must request Seller to furnish copies or abstracts of irnirumema listed in the schedule of exceptions no later than calendar days IIafter Purchaser's receipt of the tide insurance commitment. If Seller furnishes a title insurance commimnem. Sella will have the tilt insurance policy delivered to Purchaser as soon as practicable afterclosing and pay the premium at donut. I I 8. TITLE. (a) Title Review. Purchaser shall have the right to inspect the Tele Documents or abstract. Wroteo notice by Purchaser of unmer hantability of title or of arty other unsatisfactory title condition -rshown by the The Documents or abstract shall be signed by or on behalf of Purchaser and given to Seller et Listing Company on or before _f_ calendar days after Purchaser's receipt of Tale Documents or abstract, or Iwithin Rae (S) calendar days after receipt by Purchaser of any The Docwmm(s) or endorsements) adding new Exceptions) to the title commitment I I together with a copy of the rob Document adding new Exception(s) to title. If Seller a listingCompanydoes not receive Pu chaser%noticebythe date(s) 1', specified above, Purchaser shall be deemed to have accepted the condition title indisclosed by the The Documents as satisfactory. ' (b) Matters Not Shown by the Public Records. Seller shall deliver to Purchaser on or before the date sec forth in section 7. true copies of all lease(s) and survcy(s) in Seller% possession pertaining to the Property and shall disclose to Purchaser all easements, lints or other title matters rot shown by the public records of which Mkt has actual knowledge. Purchaser shall have the right to ineptetthe Property to determine if any third party(s) has any right in the Property not shown by the public records (such man unrecadedeaseman. unrecorded lease, orboundary linedisaepancy). Written noticed any unsatisfactory condition(s) disclosed by Sellers revealed by such inspection dull be signed by or on behalf ofPurchaser and given toSelkra Listing Company on or before &fpte�� 15 ,19 93 . If Sella a Listing Company does rot receive Purchaser's notice by said date, Purchaser shall be dee,+ed to have accepted tide subject to such tights, if any, °NUM parties of which Purchaser has actual knowledge. (e) Right to Cure. If Seller or Listing Company receives notice of unmerchantability dude orany other unsatisfactory tide contorts) as provided in subsection (a) or (b)above. Sellershall use reasonable effort to correct said unsatisfactory title condition(s) priortothe date dewing. If Seller fails to correct said unsatisfactory %lure condition(a) on or before the date ofclosing, this contract shall then terminate, subject to section 17: provided. however, Purchaser may, by written notice received by Sella or Listing Company on or before dosing, waiveob4ctioo to said unsatisfactory tie corditiorn(s). 9. DATE OF CLOSING. The date ofclosing shall be a her'31 19. or by rattail agreement at ea earlier dire. The hourard place of closing shall be as designated by r11}� HO Co Id. TRANSFER OF TITLE. Subject to tenderor payment on closing as required herein and planes by Purchaser with the other terms and provisions hereof. Seller shall saute and deliver a good and 'efficient wt irrrtr\/ Cee deed toP Purchaser. free andcleardalitasterthetaxes for the ofclosing,aM on coring. conveying the Proprty exceptgeneral year mega N/ : free and clear ofall liens for special improvements installed as ohtee date of Purchaser's signature hereon. whether assessed or not:except distribution utility easements. including cable TV: except those manen reflected by the Title Documents accepted by Purchaser in accordance with subsection 8(a); except those rights, if any. ofthird parties in the PR.ryct.y not shown by the public records in accordance with subsection 8(b); and subject to building and zoning regulations. H. PAYMENT OF ENCUMBRANCES. Any encumbrance required to be paid shall be paid at or before the time o(settlement from thepoceeds of this transaction or from any other aura. 12. CLOSING COSTS. DOCUMENTS AND SERVICES. Purchaser and Seller shall pay their respective closing costs at coring, except as otherwise provided herein. Purchaser and Seller shall sign and complete all customary or required document at or before closing. Fon for real estate ',. closing and settlement services shall not acted$ I�tJ•d�� sod shall be pad at closing by f 1(Chser-'; 13. PRORATIONS. General taxes for the year of closng, bawd on the most recent levy and the most recent assessment. rents, water and sewer charges. owner's association dues, and interest on continuing Iaan(s), if any, and N/A Any sales, use and transfer tax that may accrue because titbit transaction shall be paid by 5CIier 14. POSSESSION. Posseaioo ti the Property shall be delivered to Prchaser as follows: subject to the following barn) atenancy(s): i shall be prorated to date of closing, If Seller, after doting. fails to deliver possession on the date basin specified. Seller shell be wb}ct to eviction add shall be addlionally liable to Purchaser for payment of N/A per day from ttedamtisgeed pension until nankin la ddind. • IS. CONDITION OF AND DAMAGE TO PROPERTY. • The Fngaty and hchokos shalt be conveyed in their present aoudiion, ordinary wear and tear excepted. In the event the Property shall be damaged by fire or other casualty prior to time ti closing. in an amount of not more than ten percent of the total purchase price. Seller shall be obligated to repair the same before the dam of dosing. In the vat such damage is not repelled within said time or if the damages exceed such stun, this contract may be terminated at the option ofPatMaec Should Purchaser elect to carry out this contract despite such damage, Purchaser shall be entitled to credit for all the insurance Feast moulting from each damage to the Property and Inclusions. not exceeding. however, the total purchase price. Should any lalusion(s) or service(s) fail a be damaged between the date of this contract and the date ofclosing or de date &possession, whichever shall be earlier, then Seller shall be liable for the repair or replacement ofsuch Inclusion(s) or services) with a unit of similar size, age and qua ley, or is equivalent ado, less any insurance proceeds received by Purchaser covering such repair or replacement. The risk of loss for any damage to growing crops, byfiroaother casually, shall be borne by the party entitled to the growing crops, if any, as provided in section 2 and such party shall be entitled to such insurance proceeds or benefits for the growing crops. if any. 16. TIME OF ESSENCFJREMEDIES. Tires is tithe essence hereof. If any note or check received as earnest money hereunder or any other payment due hereunder is net paid, honored Of tendered when due, or if any other obligation heramder is not performed or waived as herein provided. there shall be the following remedies: (a) IF THE PURCHASER IS IN DEFAULT: IF THE HOC IN SUBSECTION (I) IS CHECKED, SELLER'S REMEDIES SHALL BE AS SET FORTH IN SUBSECTION (I) (SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE). IP SAID BOX IS NDTCHECKED, SELLER'S REMEDIES SHALL BE AS SET FORTH IN SUBSECTION (2) (LIQUIDATED DAMAOPS), ❑ (1) Specific Performance. Seller may elect to treat this contract as cancelled, in which cam all payments and things ofvalue received hereunder shall be forfeited and retained onbehalf ofSeller, and Seller may recover such diners a may be proper, or Seller may elect to treat this contract as being in full force and effect and Sella shall have the right to specific performance or damage■, a both. (2) Liquidated Damages. All payments and things ofvalue received hereunder shall be forfeited by Purchaser and retained on behalf of Sella and both parties shall thereafter be released from all obligations hereunder. ItisWeed that such payments and things of value ueLIQUIDATED DAMAGES and (except as provided in subsection (c)) are SV t PR'S SOLE AND O (LYRE EDTforPurchaser'sfailuretoperfamtheobligmendthiscoarsct. Seller expressly wanes the remedies of specific performance and additional dumps. . , - (b) IF SELLER IS IN DEFAULT: Purchaser may elect to treat this enemata eanealkd,in which case all payments and things of value received hereunder shall be returned sad Purchase may recover such hung, ps as maybe pro, orPathan may elect to treat this contract as being in full force and effect and Purchaser shall have the right to specific performance ordamyea. or butt (c) COSTS AND EXPENSES. Anything to the contrary herein notwithstanding. inthe event ofany litigation or arbitration arising air of this the court shall award to the prevailing party all reasonable costs and expense. including attorney fees. i'11. 1 I 931251 • • r.17. EARNEST MONEY DISPUTE. Notwithstanding any rumination of this contract. Purchaser and Seller agree that, in the now of any controversy resenting the earnest money and things ofnine held byb okceor&rensage nt unless mutual written instructions are received by the holder of the earnest money and things of slue, broker or closing agent shell not be required to take any action but may await any proceeding. or at broker's or closing again option and sole discretion, mryhyetpiead all parties and I shaHneoercouncostsandreasonableattorneyfen. deposit any moneys athingcdnlueinmacourtdoompetentjurisdictionand 18. INSPECTION. Purchaser or any designee. shall haw the right to have inspection(s) d the at Purchaser's expense. If written noticed unsatisfactory physical nu ran wed by Seehr r Lirty and Inclusions. I on or before N/A condition, signed by Purchaser. is nit received by Seller or Listing Company be deemed to be satin . 19 . the physical condition tine Property and Inclusions stroll factory to Purchaser. If written rocks ofany unsatisfactory condition, signed I as set forth above in this section, and if Purchaser and Seller haw not reached a written agrby �eement�, is settlement to thereof on or beforeller or Listing .19 . this contract shall then terminate. subject to section 17. I I pay for any damage which anus to the Purchaser is responsible and shall I 19. AGENCY DISC.7.OSURE, The listing Iker. nos sterna of such inspection. Iand .as sales agents (Listing broker. Lisng Company has a duty to Company) Purchaser honestly, the Listing t Sella The � Comte owes Sdeller's a trust loyaltyacting and confidence f of to Sr and only. While the I I BY SIGNING BELOW, PURCHASER y Company is TICE agent and is on beif O Seller not ALISTING 11 COMPANY IS cps t ER'S AGENT. N/A 1ACKNDW�.DGFS TIMELY NOTICE BY LISTING OR SELLING COMPANY THAT 4dSTING The selling broker, 1�+/A and its sales agents (Selling Company) represent: (IF THE BIOX IN SUBSECTION (b) IS CHECICED. SELLING COMPANY REPRESENTS PURCHASER ONLY. AS SET FORTH ISUBSECTION S 1.BSE � (b). IF THE BOX IN SUBSECTION (b) IS NOT CHECKED, SELLING COMPANY REPRESENTS FORTH IN SUBSECTION I l (a) Seller, The Selling Company owes duties of trust. (a).l at , Purchaser honestly. the Selling Company is SelIerk agent and isacting�y cc behalf confidence Seller Sellerd only. While the Selling Company BELOW, has q duty to SER ; ACKNOWLEDGES PRIOR TIMELY NOTICE BY SELLING COMPANY THAT SELLING Wedgy BY SIGNING BL'I.OW, PURCHASER I Q air. if the box is checked: The Selling SEL LING COMPANY IS SELLERS AGENT. Company has a duty r, treat Seller honestly, the Selling Company owes duties of trust, loyalty and confidence to Purchase only. While the Selling ACKNOWLEDGEomytoti TUfeLYNOTyCEBY CompanyisactingonbelWfoPurchaserandnotShceeSEURRANDLISTINGCOMPANY SELLING O0M ANY THAT IT IS PURCHASER'S AGENT. 20. ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS: . This contract is expressly conttr3Gnt upon purchasers of rt�ini�, a minimum down loan with a tcrm of no rrord Jd _years and r\ (r\tt re$t ratc of re more. +hat 7 ice'/a on an cstrrri=t(d appr�l Value of 488 taco.. 00 to Indudc ,a � mnLa-fach_jred Home with al 1 L *I I it/ services. II 2L RECOMMENDATION OF LEGAL comm.. ..By signing this document. Ptachaerand Seller acknowledge that the Selling Company or the Listing Company has recommended that Purchaser and Seller obtain the advice of their own this contract. ilegal counsel regarding rsanunetion of tale and 22. TERMINATION. In the event this contract is terminated, W1 I I I parties shall be relieved of all obligations hereunder, subject to section 17. Day things d value received hereunder shall be reamed and the 1 23, NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE/COUNTERPARTS. If this� I 1 acceptance on or before l9 Popowsi is accepted by Seller in writing and Purchaser receives notice of such l — I Acted his ocurent � be executed by � ply, separately. and when each party haneaued copy. this documemt shall Mee* e a copies takentbetween Seller get Purchaser, ' between the /�eePY thered, suchtogethershallbe II whaler�iaCl I . r r i r 0. F!A d'.. U-7-93 I��% o.. pars l.w� ' Purchaser's Address W. re, sny Rd. : BerTOLJd Co. fanSe IRO BE / BY SELLER AND LISTING COMPANY) 1I 24. ACCETANCFJCOMMISSION. Selleraaeps the above proposal this Seller shall pay to the listing Company acommatimnd ice or .I9 II as agreed upon between Sella and Listing Company for services in this SS the rchevee of or II hereunder: such payments and things of slue shall betransaction. CIompany andnt ll r,forfeitureoha d thereof eto and n Co p ray. receivedt I 1 exceed the commission, and the balance to Seller. divided hareem Listing and Seller, ore-hal(to Listing Company. but not to 7/747 21441.• II Stelkr'sAddress 10405 we IQ sou Rd- . 7 Loan' on+ Co. FT) vyr I The undersigned Selling Company acknowledges receipt of the earnest Mac IICompany confirm the respective agency disclosure sit lath is section 19.y deposit vivified in section 3 and both Salting Company and Listing Selling Company I II I Address Listing Company I Address BY: (slaw) By: mews, Owe I I I 'I I I I I 93 254 RESOLUTION RE: APPROVE AMENDMENT TO CONDITION OF APPROVAL #5 FOR RECORDED EXEMPTION NO. 1492 - GRAND MESA EGGS, INC., C/0 TERRY OSBORNE WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County. Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners, pursuant to its authority under Section 30-28-101(10)(d), CRS, as amended, did determine at a public meeting held in the Chambers of the Board, that a certain parcel of land, to be divided into two parcels, as shown on the plat known as Recorded Exemption No. 1492, does not come within the purview of the definition of the terms, "subdivision" and "subdivided land", and WHEREAS, by Resolution on May 5, 1993, the Board approved Recorded Exemption No. 1492 for Grand Mesa Eggs, Inc., c/o Terry Osborne, for property which is located in part of the SW* of Section 3, Township 1 North, Range 65 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, Grand Mesa Eggs, Inc., c/o Terry Osborne has submitted a request to delete Condition of Approval #5 from the plat of said Recorded Exempation #1492, and WHEREAS, the Board, after hearing all of the testimony presented, deemed it advisable to amend Condition of Approval #5 to Recorded Exemption #1492, by adding the following: "As an alternative, a joint well use agreement signed by both owners of the lots of the recorded exemption will satisfy this condition." NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that Condition of Approval #5 to Recorded Exemption #1492 for Grand Mesa Eggs, Inc., c/o Terry Osborne be, and hereby is, amended to include the abovementioned verbiage. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that Conditions of Approval #1 through #4 continue to be in effect, unchanged by this amendment. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that the applicant shall submit an amended mylar plat to the Department of Planning Services to be recorded in the Office of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. The plat shall be prepared in accordance with the requirements of Section 11.7 of the Weld County Subdivision Ordinance. The plat shall be submitted within sixty days from the date of approval by the Board of County Commissioners. The applicant shall be responsible for paying the recording fees. 931252 CC ; %C; nLc ltPt°t DFAi r RE: AMEND RE #1492 - GRAND MESA EGGS, INC. PAGE 2 The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 8th day of December, A.D., 1993. ATTEST Weld County Clerk to the Board BY: APPROVE TO FORM: Barbara J. Kirkme,er linty Attorne r to t�-B6ar_�__/ arena-Tem BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO . Const airman E. Baxte 4 931252 a tet 11`P COLORADO mEmORginDU _ "' .r.. 2, at Board of County Commissioners Dam December C3,�1993 To r r,• Monica Daniels -Mika, Current Plannex fb(79 7Tiil Fmm RE -1492 Subject; Recorded Exemption 1492 was conditionally approved by the Board of County Commissioners on May 5, 1993 by a 3-2 vote. As part of the approval, Condition of Approval #5 required the applicant to enter into a common ownership of the water well and to establish mechanisms to manage the operation of the well. The applicant is now contending that Condition of Approval #5 has been meet and does not need to be shown on the plat as originally approved. Staff concurs that Condition of Approval #5 of RE -1492 has been satisfied, however the original condition of approval required that this standard be met prior to recording the plat. The mere fact that the standard has been completed does not necessitate the need to eliminate it from the plat. It is the opinion of the Department of Planning Services' staff that the Conditions of Approval for RE -1492 be stated on the plat as originally approved. 931252 LAW OFFICE of JOHN R. DENT November 24, 1993 WO rosy Raft Weld County Commissioners % Mr. Chuck Cunliffe, Weld County Planning Department 1400 North 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 RE: GRAND MESA EGGS, INC.-RECORDED EXEMPTION, RE -1492 REQUEST FOR MODIFICATION OF CONDITIONS Dear Commissioners: 616 Denver Avenue P.O. Box 333 Fort Lupton. CO 80621 (303) 8574667 Metro Denver (303) 65&2028 On May 5, 1993 you approved a Recorded Exemption for Grand Mesa Eggs allowing a division of a five acre parcel into 2 parcels of 3.5 acres and 1.5 acres. At the recommendation of the Office of the State Engineer Division of Water Resources, you included as Conditions on the Recorded Exemption, Condition #5 which provided for 3 separate things, namely: a. "The well should be owned in common by all property owners usint the well. Access to the well and the right to establish and maintain pipeline shall be provided by easements where necessary". b. "The well should be jointly owned by lot owners." c. "Covenants and other mechanisms should establish a Lot Owner's Association with powers to make decisions concerning management and operation of the well. A joint maintenance agreement is required as part of such an association". In behalf of Grand Mesa Eggs, the applicant, we would request that those Conditions as recited in Paragraph 5 of your Resolution approving the Recorded Exemption be deleted. Grand Mesa Eggs has now entered into an Agreement with the purchaser of the 3.5 acres (Grand Mesa will retain the 1.5 acres) which we believe adequately addresses all issues pertaining to the common well which will be shared by the two lot owners. For you reference, we enclose herewith a copy of the Agreement for Use of Water Well, and a copy of the letter of November 10, 1993 from the office of the State Engineer in which the State Engineer acknowledges review of the Well Agreement entered into by the parties and concludes with the statement that after review of the Well Agreement, the State Engineer's office has "no objection to the well providing service to the two lots under this well sharing agreement." 91252 Page 2. The State Engineer however does address Item 9 in the Well Sharing Agreement and suggests that language be added to require the lot owner requesting termination of service pursuant to that provision to notify the County of an alternate water supply for the 1.5 acre lot. We do not, however, believe amendment of the Well Agreement should be required nor that this should be a condition of the Recorded Exemption since in that scenario the owner of the 1.5 acre lot will have voluntarily terminated their own right to access this particular well and will have presumably made arrangements for an alternate water supply. Additionally, this was not one of the original Conditions recommended by the State Engineer in the first instance. We would, however, request that this matter be scheduled for your review and attention at the December 8th meeting of the County Commissioners. We are waiting to close on the sale of this property pending resolution of the Conditions on the Recorded Exemption. Consequently, we would appreciate your earliest review. Thank you/ I Sin WC,e- ohn R. Dent JRD:br Enc: cc: Mr. Terry Osborn, Grand Mesa Eggs Mr. and Mrs. Clifford Price 931252 OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER Division of Water Resources Department of Natural Resources 1313 Sherman Street, Room 818 Denver, Colorado 80203 Phone (303) 866-3581 FAX (303) 866-3589 STATE OF COLORADO November 10, 1993 MR CHUCK CUNLIFF WELD COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1400 N. 17TH AVENUE GREELEY, CO 80631 Dear Mr. Cunliff: Roy Romer Govemor Ken Salazar Executive Director Hal D. Simpson State Engineer Re: Grand Mesa Eggs Inc., Recorded Exemption, RE -1492 SW1/4 Sec. 3, T1N, R6SW, 6TH P.M W. Division 1, W. District 1 We have received a proposed shared well agreement for the well with permit No. 15950-F, decreed in Division 1 Water Court Case No. W-5197, which will serve the two lots to be created from a 5 acre parcel under this proposal. The agreement provides for easements in lieu of locating the well on an outlot, and provides a use agreement in lieu of the joint ownership recommended in our letter of April 6, 1993. Although this office does not have the expertise to evaluate the agreements for the use of a water well, we do have one comment. Item 9 addresses termination of well service to the lot without a well. We suggest that language be added to require the lot owner requesting termination of service to simultaneously notify the county of the alternative water supply for the 1.5 acre commercial lot requesting termination of service from the well with permit No. 15950•F. This agreement generally appears to allow for a reliable water supply for each of the two lots. We have no objection to the well providing service to the two lots under this well sharing agreement. If you have any questions please contact me. Sincerely, c%Lot, S&L .,' JS\grandmesa enclosure cc: Alan Berryman, Division Engineer Water Supply Branch Dan G. Griffin John Schurer, P.E. Senior Water Resource Engineer P9R7 I NOV 15 1993 c1 _ wag ""'1 • .yrrAy 931252 -AGREEMENT FOR USE OF WATER WELL THIS AGREEMENT, made this day of by and between Grand Mesa Eggs, tion, Seller, and Clifford A. Price- and Betty L. Price, o Corporation, Buyers_ WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Buyers intend to 3.705 Acres, more or less, known County, Colorado, also described Plat Book , at Page of Colorado, and; purchase property consisting of as Recorded Exemption #1492, Weld as Lot B on the plat recorded in the Weld County records, State of WHEREAS, Sellers will retain 1.295 Acres, more or less, of property adjacent to Recorded exemption #1492 described as Lot A on said plat, and; - WHEREAS, Lot A has no domestic water supply and will continue to be served by domestic water.from the well located on Lot B; • NOW ':THEREFORE,. -..the partiesagree with respect to the ownership,::_use,_:=operation,__maintenance,...and.access to the _well located_on-Lot_BLas=follows; =1 - _Seller.-andrits=successors -{,• -4 rrerestrana-ri r, a -sh_l _ e - entitled to-drawvwater_frf.r.rhezwell_located=on=Lot_B,rwhich_well_: wil be=owned_solely-by-:Buyers_ Sellersshall be..entitledr.to=draw-no-more_than_30% of -the flow-:from_said_well_at=any give -point -in _time, with_Buyers being- entitled_to 70% of the flow•from'such well_at any given point: -in time. 3. Seller shall be responsible for 30% of all costs of operation and reasonable maintenance of such well, irregardless of the actua1_ amount of vaterr.:.R....-- drawn by Sellers. Costs of operation shall include but not be limited to electrical charges associated with pumping of such water. Maintenance charges may include but shall not be limited to pump repair and replacement, casing, or valve repair or replacement, as well as reasonable preventative inspection or repair as necessary in the dgmet of Buyers and Seller. Seller shall be responsible for its ju share of costs herein only so long as it is the owner of Lot A_ Thereafter, said costa shall be borne by .c�l-er•s successor in_interest_ 4. Seller's share of maintenance and operational costs shall be billed to Seller by. Buyers within seven days after Buyers -receive ...copies _of invoices- or statements relating to the maintenance-and._operational,costs:ofysaid=well.-.Except for'normal_'- :monthly operational:.Icosts,._there,:shall_be:no prior_ expenditures . approved or made without mutual discussion and consent between Buyers and Seller, except in the case of an emergency. 5. As to electrical charges, if requested by Seller, Buyers .Shall have a separate electric meter for the well installed, in which case as to the cost of installation of such meter, such cost shall be divided equally between Buyers and Seller, each paying one-half. 6. Seller may draw up to but not exceeding 30% of the flow from this well at any point in time but shall have no right to any. portion of the flow not exceeding 30% which is not drawn at the well. Buyers may restrict the amount drawn by Seller from the well at the wellhead to 30%. 7. At the present time the supply line from the wellhead on Lot B extends in a northeasterly direction to the building presently located on Lot B. From Lot B, the supply line then extends in a southwesterly direction to the building presently located on Lot A. Any maintenance and repair that maybe necessary to that portion of the supply line running from the wellhead to the building located on Lot B shall be paid 70%.by Buyers and 30% by. the Seller. Any repair and maintenance for that portion of the supply line running between the building located on'Lot B and the .building_located.on.Lot.A shall be paid 100% by the Seller. Buyers ._hereby-grant_an_easewent_unto-Seller..across-Lot_B_for..the purpose of maintaini,zg-andxepairing-the existi g=supply_line_as_-itruns :.r:=from-the -building-presently .located: on ..Lot B-to�the__buildinq _ located-onrSot=A. In_addition; 8 era__ _ a xclusive easementtto:.sellerrfor_accessi utility; water welLand=wateenflne -'-maintenance, :.: construction, =-and repaix as . shown :onz.tha_. said _plat z referred=to.herein.. 8. Buyers shall not allow any liens to be filed against said well. in the event any liens are filed, or if any bills are not paid by Buyers thereby threatening the shut off of the flow of water from said well, Seller may pay said bills or pay said liens and Buyers shall reimburse Seller. 9�--- TIpQll thirty. : dhy.: - j �..j.. written notice, Seller, or its successors in interest, may give notice to Buyers that it no longer wishes to draw water from said well. Appropriate arrangements will then be madefor the cessation of the flow of water to Lot A, said expenses to be borne by Seller. Thereafter, this agreement shall no longer be effective and Seller, or its successor in interest, will have no further obligations with regard to the maintenance and operation of said well, and shall have no right to draw water from said well. - 10. The term Seller and Buyers as used herein shall include each party's successors in. title. ; += r 11 This Agreement shall constitute a covenant. r...,.t.,q with. >--.the..land, and.a.burden_upon Lot B, for the benefit of Lot.A. w. - 12. It is further and agreemen agreements herein contained lshay lleextend to that all of b the covenants respective representatives, and be bin Pective parties. , successors and long uthe IN assigns of the foregoing Agreement on 'the ay and year firstabove the ..above above and written.- GRAND MESA EGGS, INC., a'nAlisaaoo7\Alan= • By Dan L. Hudgens General Mager, Seller Clifford a. Price . Sr., Buyer Betty L. Price, _Buyer 9312.52 RESOLUTION RE: APPROVAL OF RECORDED EXEMPTION NO. 1551 - ORR WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners, pursuant to its authority under Section 30-28-101(10)(d), CRS, as amended, did determine at a public meeting held in the Chambers of the Board, that a certain parcel of land, to be divided into two parcels, as shown on the plat known as Recorded Exemption No. 1551, does not come within the purview of the definition of the terms, "subdivision" and "subdivided land", and WHEREAS, the request for Recorded Exemption No. 1551 was submitted by Clair B. Orr for property which is located in part of the Ni NWt, Section 1, Township 6 North, Range 65 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado, being more particularly described in the plat which shall be provided by the applicant and known as Exhibit "A", said plat to be recorded, and WHEREAS, this request is to divide the property into parcels estimated to be approximately 75 acres and 5 acres. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the hereinabove described parcel of land be, and hereby is, exempt from the definition of the terms, "subdivision" and "subdivided land". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that this approval is conditional upon the following: 1. A Weld County septic permit is required for the proposed home septic system and shall be installed according to the Weld County Individual Sewage Disposal System (ISDS) regulations. 2. Any existing septic system(s) which is not currently permitted through the Weld County Health Department will require an ISDS evaluation prior to the issuance of the required septic permit(s). 3. An ISDS must be located at least 100 feet from any well. 4. ISDS permits must be finalized and approved by an Environmental Protection Specialist within one (1) year of the application date. 5. The following notes shall be placed on the plat: A. The proposed well will be the only well exempted under Section 37-92-602, located on the lot. B. The return flow of the water well shall be to the same stream flow as the well is located in. 931253 RE/55/ ec. PCB APAL. RE: RE #1551 - ORR PAGE 2 C. The waste water treatment system must not have a consumptive use greater than 10 percent. (A septic and leach field system is considered to have a consumptive use not exceeding 10 percent). D. The well permit will be limited to the use of ordinary household purposes inside one single-family dwelling. Outside use for lawn and garden irrigation or watering of domestic animals is prohibited. If the applicant applies for and receives a well permit which is different from the one which is currently in place, the conditions as set forth will be the same conditions which are put on the well as set forth by the State Engineer at that time. E. The rate of pumping of the well shall be limited to 15 gallons per minute. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that the applicant shall submit a mylar plat to the Department of Planning Services to be recorded in the Office of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. The plat shall be prepared in accordance with the requirements of Section 11.7 of the Weld County Subdivision Ordinance. The plat shall be submitted within sixty days from the date of approval by the Board of County Commissioners. The applicant shall be responsible for paying the recording fees. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 8th day of December, A.D., 1993. ATTEST: Weld County Clerk to the Boar BY: /mil{ 4 Deputy Cle'rk to the APPROVED AS TO FORM: y A t W. H. Webste Pro- em at.41/Hal Barbara J. Kirkmeykr BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Constance L. Harbert, C��hairm JetraZ 931253 ec--1556 APPLICATION FOR RECORDED EXEMPTION PHONE: 353-3845, Ext. 3540 Department of Planning Services, 1400 N. 17th Avenue, Greeley, Colorado 80631 FOR PIANNIN ENT USE ONLY: APPL. FEE CASE N0. ZONING DISTRICT _ DATE RECORDING FEEl!11 RECEIPT NO./ 1673X APPL. CHECKED BY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT: (Print or type only except for required signatures) I (we), the undersigned hereby request that the following described property be designated a recorded exemption by the Weld County Board of County Commissioners. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: S 1/2 of the SW 1/4 SeC 1 T 6N R 65 W of the 6th P.M. TOTAL ACREAGE: 80 Has this property been divided from or had divided from i since August 30, 1972? Yes No x Is this parcel of land under consideration the total contiguous land owned by the applicant? Yes No x FEE OWNERS OF PROPERTY: Name: Clair B. Orr Address: 801 8th st., #230, Greeley, Co &0631 phone:351-8777 Name: Address: Phone: WATER SOURCE: Larger Parcel North Weld Smaller Parcel TYPE OF SEWER: Larger Parcelpronosed Septi8maller Parcel PROPOSED USE: Larger Parcel Agricultural Smaller Parcel ACREAGE: Larger Parcel Z5 Smaller Parcel EXISTING DWELLINGS: (Yes or No) no (Yes or No) North Weld Proposed Septic rural residence 5 no I hereby depose and state under the penalties of perjury that all statements, proposals, and/or plans submitted with or contained within this application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. COUNTY OF WELD ) STATE OF COLORADO ) Subscribed and sworn =.( SEAL) COQ Q 0 Signature: Owner or Authorized Agent to before me this Q43 day of S•ep1,. , 1993. My Commission Expires 7/ 3/ 9-1 hrb lc,e I Notary Public 931253 'WARD OF DIRECTORS ' ERNEST TIGGES GARY SIMPSON ERNEST ROSS W,M. MCKAY CHARLES ACHZIGER September 30, 1993 NORTH WELDL'DUNTY WATER DISTRICT HIGHWAY 85 • LUCERNE, COLORADO 80646 LYLE NELSON, MGR. P.O. BOX 56 • PHONE 356-3020 RE: Water Service Dear Sirs, This letter is in response to your inquiry regarding water service to the following described property 51 of the SW1 of Section 1 -6N -65W 1. Water service is presently being provided to the above described property. 2, x Water service can be made available to the above described property provided all requirements of the District are satisfied. If contracts have not been consumated with North Weld County Water District within one year from date of this letter, this letter shall become null and void. Additional comments: Prices would include current price ,(53750, price good for 30 days from the above date) and for line extension. Sincerely, NORTH WELD COUNTY ;AT R DISTRICT• Lyl+'D. Nelson, Manager of a tap $3 p/ft Clare Orr 931253 ' w _. R 1403 REC 02352036 09/27/93 15146 55.00 1/001 AR235?036 — F 1122 DRAY ANY 2t3ERETEZN CLERIC A RECORDER NEIL CO, CO WARRANTY DEED 77115 DEED. e.a el. 24th ay./ September 1993 , taus WILLIAM C. THOMAS and ROSE MARY THOMAS der 'Cary el Weld CLAIR B. ORR red Surd is::� I -:! _ � 6 I wlewlussu ss $01 Btl Street, Suite 230 II Greeley, Colorado 80631 day Cateyd Weld ar4 Sue dCatwae.grew : II WTINL�'fR,Tha le p ew, a, ed. 00IINNrr.ad ate tad SeVmtY'live Thousand and 00/100e—�---____�___�____ Ido sopped wffe.,cy d et.t .,hentyLn.baw.Warmed. ney..u.,aaand amnyN. ew premeds. w Ow.. premeds. ,.n, I cam, ludcoYmn. web s-Eyoee,htWars dad means brew, ale nalmatey somber .ab.pew.,ee,.ifay..vst.ly iede,.e.ee Ca wyd Weld -w Sue oCom.b dn.r.and r bb.. 740c -ti— The S 1/2 of the SW 1/4 of Section 1, Township 6 North, 1.0 Il Range 65 west of the 6th P.M. TOGETHER WITH two and one-half shares of the capital stock of the Owl Creek Supply and Irrigation CO., two shares of the Larimer and Weld Irrigation Co., I� two shares of the. Latimer and Weld Reservoir Co., and one share of the Windsor Reservoir and Canal Co. II RESERVING HOWEVER, unto grantors, an undivided 1/2 interest in all oil, gas I� and other minerals presently owned by said grantors, if any, in, on, under, upon and that may be produced from said premises for a period of 10 years ending on September 24, 2003, It is the intention that said undivided 1/2 interest as reserved hereby shall then revert to the Grantee, his heirs, Isuccessors and or assigns. TOGETHER WITH the right of ingress and egress mbrat Wsnd-c 'a' necessary to explore for, mine and remove such oil TOGETHER wit el end in gas 411e ah. d4.mene and other minerals. p aseof. and a d 1 e.n,ht, olNswyelwbb'sad&,eWIkeRwaroNW a, nevaraios, nsulder W nmsNhn, ems, nnles and proA. Umerp, and ail the tare. n1M, roles mwmd. club' sad i•n,wt ..l,evwrda I I I maw. tole on law of entity of. In an. s Ite.hne bemired mean, win to lenainmle.. YW appwwna.n. TO NAVE AND TO HOLD IM tee palm.. .Mee teeailed ate de .bey. with Ile .wwwn.wn. elan aw J.Id.., w ken mid saps envy. And they ms, eMm.elf..a hein.and pno.I Spec w,le.,lb.cmn 1 . grim. eepin.ee .w Io ea,eeew,w,.M Mama IInun. avatar de lime Mike,Ieteing and aellwry d,bpne.at..len well.n,eld,e pcmnn.luegwulynl. e.rwd. W.. pato. saws i! .Ind indetm.Je estate d Nhemance,m In. in lee nimp,. And he rood nib.. lull ppyywl lwful.Mnly uw,w. boron. ..ell.dtywyiw a iI In nun., al4 fan s .erwW. aW the de we .e het are clear Mm, all keno and whey 5Wls. Iwtd,w...Je.. lens. Wee, eat...la.w, I: axvnde.l4s lSlewnm% of Whaewr klS a n.rwe awe. aver. general taxes for 1993 and subsequent I Ij years, except easements, restrictions, covenants, conditions, reservations, and rights of way of record, if any, except Oil and Gas Lease recorded l December 6. 1992 in Book 1361 as Reception No. 02313707 'I The VIM, Selland will WARRANT ANDRDkEVER DEFERDee. onbb.r ersdpsm.m m the toes a.4 p vtY p..emiende. gnome. 11 ti• heir. tad maitre. natal, enawry penance- p.wnle/Wly.bmolaeIota* wany pn thereof. TheunpW nomsvth4lh.chdme pew., 1 de pa. We 4n/.e, and de sr of my render Nall e. pp..cable s W lenders. IN wrraAs WME1Eor, the7 range has nmwe d 'hi. deed on the de, .el loth atom.il William C. Thomas Rouse Mary Thomas STATE OF COLORADO essays, weld }w The °suing imminent xis eemsINrs Were me w. 24th a,y nl September by William C. Thomas and Rose Mary Thomas My avmrwNn "pun : C4:14;.' r ,1 ..`::.......... 04, .e C ,let '. •II In Derby. town "Gay C,d1 •. '' m• . es•,wwr' I,Inerger 1NY.0U.Cags Iv 94 War.. my 5,5 and •dM.I wJ. . W93 . M41yiA. R/..7441. w.YAM'Y DUD 1Im rblTyae sawn m.JISO P WpNrna 1141 w...• L„Onw CO MT:— I NII:.lJYn_ I I.nl RECORDED E?n+JWTION OC ZSTrONNATRE 1. Explain the reason for the proposed recorded exemption and how each proposed lot will be used. This property is being proposed for a R.E. because it is not prime farm ground due to the slope and some seepy areas. In an effort to improve the farm the owner would like to construct a center pivot irrigation system. With this system in place the South East corner of the property will become non -irrigated. The smaller non -irrigated lot will be used for a rural residence with complimentary ag. uses. The larger irrigated lot will continue in a farming operation. 2. Describe the location, size and present use of the area where each proposed new lot will be created. This eighty acres is located in the S 1/2 of the SW 1/4, sec 1, T6N, R65W of the 6th P.M. The present use is farm ground. 3. Explain how the proposal is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan and any adopted municipal plan, if applicable. This proposal is consistent with the policies of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan due to the following: A. No lot has been created by a Recorded Exemption within the last five (5) years. B. It is in an agricultural district and the contiguous ownership is more than twice the minimum lot size. C. Both lots shall have access from W.C.R. 72 which is a county road right of way. D. Since the smaller lot will no longer be irrigated it will become non-productive. The comprehensive plan allows for a single family dwelling on non-productive ag. land. E. There will be no additional cost to Weld County Taxpayers and no additional public services will need to be provided. F. The comprehensive plan permits low density residential development on non -prime ag. land. This is not prime ag. land. 931253 G. Constructing a center pivot irrigation system supports local irrigation eg, companies, pipeline companies, the Public Service Co. and will make this a more productive farm. H. The comprehensive plan encourages methods that will conserve soil and water. A sprinkler system will do both, save water and soil erosion. 4. Explain how the uses permitted will be compatible with existing uses surrounding the proposed recorded exemption. The existing uses surrounding the proposed R.E. are agricultural uses and activities and compatible rural residences. These are the same uses proposed with the approval of this R.E. 5. Explain how the proposal is consistent with the intent of the zoning district it is located within. The intent of the agricultural zone is to preserve prime ag. land. This is not prime farm land and when not irrigated is non-productive. The intent of the agricultural zone is also to provide areas for agricultural activities and uses. The approval of this R.E. will provide an area for a rural residence where a family can engage in agricultural. activities, ie. 4-H project;. 6. Explain how the proposal is consistent with efficient and orderly development. This proposal is consistent with the efficient development of the area because using a non -irrigated corner for a building site is a very efficient use of the lot and a sprinkler system is an efficient use of our water resources. It is orderly because the entire area has lot sizes within this range. 7. Explain how adequate provision for the protection of the health, safety, and welfare of the inhabitants of the neighborhood and the County will be accomplished. There is nothing being proposed by the R.E. that would in any way reduce the current protection of the health, safety, and welfare of the inhabitants of the neighborhood or the county. 931253 f EYAtA 931253 • CERTIFICATE OF CONVEYANCES SERVICES STATE OF COLORADO ) COUNTY OF WELD ) The hereby certifies that following conveyances 1972. TRANSAMERICA LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Order No. 8508293-B WELD COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING TITLE INSURANCE or ABSTRACT COMPANY it has made a careful search of its records, and finds the affecting the real estate described herein since August 30, The S1/2 of the SW1/4 of Section 1, Township 6 North, Range 65 West of the 6th F.M., County of Weld, State of Colorado. CONVEYANCES (if none appear, so state): Reception No. 02352036 , Book 1403 Reception No. , Book Reception No. . Book Reception No. , Book Reception No. , Book Reception No. , Book Reception No. , Book Reception No. , Book This Certificate is made for the use and benefit of the Department of Planning Services of Weld County, Colorado, This Certificate is not to be construed as an Abstract of Title nor an opinion of Title, nor a guarantee Title, and the liability of TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY is hereby limited to the fee paid for this Certificate. In Witness Whereof, TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE has caused this certificate to be signed by its 29th COMPANY Sn proper officer this day of September , A.D., 1993. at 7:00 A.M. o'clock. TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 921253 Wi�'Yc fa lot Pr' COLORADO • • DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303) 353.3845. EXT. 3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 1400 N. 17TH AVENUE GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 Date: October 15, 1993 CASE NUMBER: RE -1556 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from Clair Orr for a Recorded Exemption. The parcel of land is described as the S2 of the SW4 of Section 1, T6N, R65W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is northeast of Weld County Road 47 and Weld County Road 72. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by October 29, 1993, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Monica Daniels -Mika, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. 2. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: 3. We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Signed: Date: Please refer to the enclosed letter. Agency: 931253 REFERRAL LIST NAME: Clair Orr REFERRALS SENT: October 15, 1993 COUNTY 4Attorney $_Health Department Extension Service Emergency Management Office ^Sheriff's Office _Engineering Housing Authority _Airport Authority Building Inspection CASE NUMBER: RE -1556 REFERRALS TO BE RECEIVED BY: October 29, 1993 $TATF Division of Water Resources Geological Survey _Department of Health Department of Transportation Historical Society Water Conservation Board Oil and Gas Conservation Commission FZ tPISTRICTS Ault F-1 _Berthoud F-2 Briggsdale F-24 Brighton F-3 ~Eaton F-4 Fort Lupton F-5 �Galeton F-6 _Hudson F-7 Johnstown F-8 La Salle F-9 Mountain View F-10 Milliken F-11 Nunn F-12 ~Pawnee F-22 Platteville F-13 Platte Valley F-14 `Poudre Valley F-15 �Raymer F-2 _Southeast Weld F-16 Windsor/Severance F-17 _Wiggins F-18 _Western Hills F-20 OTHEg _Central Colo. Water Conservancy Dist. _Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. _Tri-Area Planning Commission TOWNS and CLTIES Ault Brighton Broomfield �Dacono Eaton Erie —Evans _Firestone Fort Lupton Frederick Garden City _Gilcrest Greeley Grover _Hudson _Johnstown Keenesburg Kersey La Salle �Lochbuie Longmont Mead Milliken New Raymer `Northglenn Nunn Pierce Platteville Severance _Thornton _Windsor C03JNTIES _Adams Boulder �Lorimer FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES _US Army Corps of Engineers USDA -APHIS Veterinary Service Federal Aviation Administration Federal Communication Commission SOIL CONSERVATIONPISTRIc'TS _Brighton Fort Collins -- --Greeley _Longmont West Adams 931253 • S October 15, 1993 Clair B. Orr 801 8th Street, #230 Greeley, CO 80631 Subject: Recorded Exemption 1556. Dear Mr. Orr: Your recorded exemption application is complete and in order and will be processed on or before November 15, 1993. If it is determined that the application meets the approval criteria of the Weld County Subdivision Ordinance, you will be notified that the recorded exemption is approved. If the staff determines that the application does not meet the approval criteria, you will be notified and asked to appear before the Board of County Commissioners at a public hearing. You will be informed of the hearing date prior to the hearing. The Board of County Commissioners will then consider your application and make a final decision on the recorded exemption. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please call me. Sincerely, Monica Daniels -Mika Current Planner MDM/sfr C}Ytfa.iniQ coin. k CQafkOvr W-15-93 331253 COLORADO Wit December 1, 1993 • DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303) 353-3845, EXT.3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 1400 N.17TH AVENUE GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 Clair Orr 801 8th Street, #230 Greeley, CO 80631 Subject: RE -1556 - Request for a Recorded Exemption on a parcel of land described as the S2 of SW4 ,of Section 1, T6N, R65W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. Dear Mr. Orr: I have scheduled a meeting with the Board of County Commissioners on Wednesday, December 8, 1993, at 9:00 a.m. to consider your application. This meeting will take place in the County Commissioners' Hearing Room, first floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado. It is recommended that you or a representative be in attendance to answer any questions the Board of County Commissioners might have with respect to your application. The Department of Planning Services' staff will make a recommendation concerning this application to the Board of County Commissioners. It is the responsibility of the applicant to call the Department of Planning Services' office a few days before the date of the Commissioners' hearing to obtain the recommendation. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to call me. Respectfully, Mont. a Daniels -Mika Current Planner - MDM/sfr 931253 .e. to AM -Mn S REEL Y •IP r vu.Y FIELD CHECK FILING NUMBER: RE -1556 DATE OF INSPECTION: October 27, 1993 APPLICANTS NAME: Clair Orr REQUEST: A Recorded Exemption. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The S2 SW4 of Section 1, T6N, R65W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: Northeast of the intersection of Weld County Road 47 and Weld County Road 72. LAND USE: N Farm production E Corn production S Agricultural production W Agricultural production ZONING: COMMENTS: N A (Agricultural) E A (Agricultural) S A (Agricultural) W A (Agricultural) The larger site is presently in weeds. The smaller lot has a residential dwelling. The site plan is correct as supplied by the applicant, with the exception of the entrance onto Weld County Road 72. Access to the site is by Weld County Road 47 a gravel County road. This site is several feet higher than the road. Monica Daniels -Mika Current Planner 931253 COLORADO Aut. mEmoRAnDum To Weld County Planning Gib November 5, From Jeff Stoll, Director, Environmental Heal" Subp4 Case Number: RE -1556 Name: Orr, Cla r PT S2, Section 01, Township 06 North, Range 65 West Environmental Protection Services has reviewed this proposal; the following conditions are recommended to be part of any approval: 1. A Weld County Septic Permit is required for the proposed home septic system and shall be installed according to the Weld County Individual Sewage Disposal Regulations. 2. Any existing septic system(s) which is not currently permitted through the weld County Health Department will require an I.S.D.S. Evaluation prior to the issuance of the required septic permit(s). 3. It is the policy of this Division not to recommend for approval of any lot size less than one (1) acre, which will utilize an Individual Sewage Disposal System. 4. An Individual Sewage Disposal System must be located at least 100 feet from any well. 5. An Individual Sewage Disposal System permit must be finalized and approved by an Environmental Protection Specialist within one (1) year of the application date. JLS/tj-2298 1EMe1Aem��l�y 3w1753 WATER RES. 1P}: UR TRIM, t\IN MACK INK. J'PJiCAr'Ic�?? FOR: ' A MKT O __ A PERMIT 1O REPLACEMENT — A PERMIT TO — OTTER LYPLJCALrr wi/�4 .-. C. T/° ht A S TEL:303-866-3589 Nov 23 93 LS:35 No.010 P.04 COLORADO Dl V IS10N OP WATER RESOURCES 101 CoNn61ec Bldg, 1545 Sh.rm a Skeet, UenwT.Colondv 50201 APPLICATIor MUST DR COMPLR P2) liElol1RR ACCLr tATQCE, GROUND WATER TO Bi': USE) FORT USE GROUND WATER CONSTRUCT A WELT. FOR NO. INSTALL A JUMP 3trect Address ;ity & State 26fa- r¢6J/e ti e Avr•w.0.- ln(0.fiwo`d CColophone No. 4 a �W 93 `IAMB OP AQUIFER aBouND VO`T'ER is 1'0 BE Ol`rAJNED ?ROM: PROPOSED TOTAL DEMO OY WELL q 4 r i't EVE 11aI MAXCMUM PUMPING RATE L/ 'DOMESTIC (1) LIVESTOCK (P) MUNICIPAL (8) OTNFR 1 1* -1 COIRmeRCI (u) INDUSTRIAL 5) IRRIGATION (6) WELL LOCATION / COUNTY ircr d NW y of the. SM' * ofSection. / einefo T. _4_2, R. �_j seniOf64( M. IN ADDIT1 0 TIN , TEE WELT MUST BE IDCATED WITII RYJ'')i4FaiCE TO GONENNMXNT SURVEY CORNERS, MONUML2ITF. OR SECTION LINES BY DISTANCE AND BEARING (DOMESTic c wElIS MAY DE LOCATED BY LOT) BLOCK, & SUBDIVISION.) 4VTItAGE ANNUAL AMOUNT OF GROUND WATER TO SE APPROPRIATE) Acre-feet ANTICIPATED GROUT PROGRAM Material intervals Placement Method YROPOSFJ) CASING: Plain G in. in. Perf. ( in. in. Driller Address .et4>>.Adr/r..e Arm,. Gn/- ifro/e 1}' WELL IS USL7) FOR IRFJCA'1'lON, RACK 31DE OF !MIS AP)LICATTON MUST RE COMPWITZ..JOJ47 etnumir o - a.o from _ j ft. to __ it, from ft. to ft. from up ft. to of ft. from ft. to ft. 561± s+141-4- arizn, No. /,y,2g_ ft. from 00 ft. Prom section line (North or 'Muth) ji)n.r7'-- section Tina (Fast or Vest) tar BLACK k1L1NG II SUBDIVISION Ground Wntor Benin Motor Mgmnt. Dist. Anticipated drilling date Owner of land on which well is located: W,/i•'+ 4 rG•rw S Zoe let 192 Other wator Kights an this law dr,(.rej spec/' of 14cA„r/., " aid we/d Rrtrrrr/r. 34Itte$z4p4,cr and( ws/e(jrril IIjn t//5' SA wars ow(Gr A $$Rp as1 Zrellel i.* ZSkA"t3 of'•c,v./rw(/✓ f'4 M.Offi/•ew/,lyr/iesn JlSi iat A cant S1txTnture App cant FOB OFFICE USE ONLY CONDITIONS OF AFJIROVAI, AYI'L,JCA'TION A '}3tOVA): VALID 1+OIt ONE (1) YEAR AloTa DATE ISSUED VERBS MEN= NOR GOOD CAUSE CILCWN TO THE ISSUING AGENCY. PESP :T N0. _ DATE I8OUF7) Waif. -rx BY 61065 RAY 17 1972 %Xl jw 931253 wtWAT �R RES. THIS FORM MUST SS SUBMITTED C WITHIN e0 DRYS Or cOMPLSYION OF TN! WORK DESCRIBED HlRE- ON. TYPE OR PRINT IN SLACK INK. TEL:303-866-3539 Nov 23 93 15:35 No; 41_0 P_`02 COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 300 Columbine Bldg., 1845 Sherman St. Denver, Coloredo 80203 WELL COMPLETION AND PUMP INSTALLATION REPORT PERMIT NUMBER A1OA5 WELL OWNER _MUM, C.J1ICSIAS ADDRESS Wt7 17th yM____ ay, 05 RpA31-_-- DATE COMPLETED ,10 WELL LOG From To Type and Color of Material Water Lac, 0 12 29 29} 32 34 38 39 43 47 48 53 54 63 64 69 694 95} 130 137 140 152 158 159 178 12 • 29 2 32 34 38 39 43 47 48 53 54 63 64 69 69} 95 95} 130 137 140 152 159 159 178 195 Use Clay Yellow shale 9} Coal Shale Coal Shale Coal Sandstone Shale Coal sandstone Coal Shale Coal Shale Coal Shale Rock Sandstone Shale Sandstone Shale Sandstone Rook Sandstone Shale TOTAL DEPTH 195 ft. additional pare n.Cenary to complete ioy Nk NOV z073 OM Mout= trot tanatit can ...�„ 14 of theme 14 of Sec. • T. __6.._. _A—. It __65_ �.� . . 6tb_Y P.M. HOLE DIAMETER _8_._ in. from _ I —to _91_ fl all. ,to 195 _ft. In, from to ..--1L DRILLING METHOD,_ Rotary. CASINO RECORD: Plain Caine Size _6."—& kind steel.__from „SL_to_ 99 ft. Size ,� & kind from to _ ft Size & kind from _ to . ft. ripen Hole )50001:05:000, Size -Bt& kind _, from _92__ to X19,2_ ft. Size & kind _ from to Size _..._ & kind _... from to GROUTING RECORD Materiel. _ cnn.nt_ Intervals 99 ft. to_0 ft. ft. ft Placement Method _eremite pirped GRAVEL PACK; Size Interval TEST DATA Date Toned November 1 tg� Static Water Level Prior to Test 51 _ft_ Type of Test Pump pan ad Length of Ten _ ,_ LAU ft. JSustained Yield (Metered) eo Final Pumping Water Level 130 ft,., sat ?Sa Nov 23 93 15:35 No.010 P.03 WATER RES. TEL:303-866-3589 PUMP INSTALLATION REPORT ump Make • . Ype - - - - owered,by ^ _ - HP ump Serial No.__� • totor Serial No. late Installed _. 'ump Intake Depth : + Rmarks • •In r •f • YELL TEST DATA WITH PERMANENT PUMP )ate Tested 'static Water Level Prior to Test- "- .ength of Test Hours iusta)ned yield (Metered)—_ .. GPM Pumping Water Level Remarks • CONTRACTORS STATEMENT The undersigned, being duly sworn upon oath, deposes and says that he Is the contractor of the well or pump installation,desa'ibed hereon; that he has read the statement made hereon; knows the content thereof, andthiit'tl*Ulne is true of his own knowledge. ) Signature R 8 R MILL N P(111e r11C� Mc( a-21.' ./ Lion* No. Stampdt%plor do %,nty of Weld /. Ss Subecdbed"witR44 before me this 16th day of November _ , MY CotnmiSibnbxpirot: TL'L13ti33 : , 11.2d_ Notar idsile •At6 FORM TO SE teem Y IN QUADRUPLICATE; WHITE FORM. „at M M .rlrinq c p, y.d, rich ws9 .4m&. WHITE AND GREEN =MN mwt As swim* d» ape Imams. PINK COPY I. fa Ow Ownr and YELLOW COPY Afar WI Dr11Mr. 931253 FARMLANDS OF NATIONAL IMPORTANCE IN PRIME (IRRIGATED) FARMLANDS OF STATEWIDE al IMPORTANCE IRRIGATED LAND (NOT PRIME) HIGH POTENTIAL DRY CROPLAND - PRIME IF THEY BECOME IRRIGATED OTHER CATEGORIES C a 2475 • PRIME IF THEY BECOME IRRIGATED URBAN AND URBAN BUILD-UP LAND WATER OTHER LAND •I 2500 WE COUNTY Y COLORADO SHEET 2OF3 RESOLUTION RE: APPROVAL OF RECORDED EXEMPTION NO. 1556 - ORR WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado. pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners, pursuant to its authority under Section 30-28-101(10)(d), CRS, as amended, did determine at a public meeting held in the Chambers of the Board, that a certain parcel of land, to be divided into two parcels, as shown on the plat known as Recorded Exemption No. 1556, does not come within the purview of the definition of the terms, ^subdivision" and ^subdivided land", and WHEREAS, the request for Recorded Exemption No. 1556 was submitted by Clair B. Orr for property which is located in part of the S} SW}, Section 1, Township 6 North, Range 65 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado, being more particularly described in the plat which shall be provided by the applicant and known as Exhibit "A", said plat to be recorded, and WHEREAS, this request is to divide the property into parcels estimated to be approximately 75 acres and 5 acres. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the hereinabove described parcel of land be, and hereby is, exempt from the definition of the terms, "subdivision" and "subdivided land". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that this approval is conditional upon the following: 1. A Weld County septic permit is required for the proposed home septic system and shall be installed according to the Weld County Individual Sewage Disposal System (ISDS) regulations. 2. Any existing septic system(s) which is not currently permitted through the Weld County Health Department will require an ISDS evaluation prior to the issuance of the required septic permit(s). 3. An ISDS must be located at least 100 feet from any well. 4. ISDS permits must be finalized and approved by an Environmental Protection Specialist within one (1) year of the application date. 5. The following notes shall be placed on the plat: A. The proposed well will be the only well exempted under Section 37-92-602, located on the lot. B. The return flow of the water well shall be to the same stream flow as the well is located in. 931254 RE: RE #1556 - ORR PACE 2 C. The waste water treatment system must not have a consumptive use greater than 10 percent. (A septic and leach field system is considered to have a consumptive use not exceeding 10 percent), D. The well permit will be limited to the use of ordinary household purposes inside one single-family dwelling. Outside use for lawn and garden irrigation or watering of domestic animals is prohibited. If the applicant applies for and receives a well permit which is different from the one which is currently in place, the conditions as set forth will be the same conditions which are put on the well as set forth by the State Engineer at that time. E. The rate of pumping of the well shall be limited to 15 gallons per minute. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that the applicant shall submit a mylar plat to the Department of Planning Services to be recorded in the Office of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. The plat shall be prepared in accordance with the requirements of Section 11.7 of the Weld County Subdivision Ordinance. The plat shall be submitted within sixty days from the date of approval by the Board of County Commissioners. The applicant shall be responsible for paying the recording fees. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 8th day of December. A.D., 1993. ATTEST: 47 aitean Weld County Clerk to the Board BY: Deputy Cle to the APPROVED TO FORM: APPROVED BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Ayr C stance L`Har)er; Chairman arbara J. Kirkme r 931254 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RE -1551 AND RE -1556 1. A Weld County Septic Permit is required for the proposed home septic system and shall be installed according to the Weld County Individual Sewage Disposal Regulations. 3. An Individual Sewage Disposal System must be located at least 100 feet from any well. 4. Individual Sewage Disposal System permits must be finalized and approved by an Environmental Protection. Specialist within one (1) year of the application date. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant must submit evidence to the Department of Planning Services' staffthat the proposed center pivot irrigation sprinkler system is in operation. 6. The following notes shall be placed on the plat: 2. Any existing septic system(s) which is not currently permitted through the Weld County Health Department will require an Individual Septic Disposal System Evaluation prior to the issuance of the required septic permit(s). A. The proposed well will be the only well exempted under Section 37- 92.602, located on the lot. B. The return flow of the water well shall be to the same stream flow as the well is located in. C. The waste water treatment system must not have a consumptive use greater than 10 percent. (A septic and leach field system is considered to have a consumptive use not exceeding 10 percent). D. The well permit will be limlted to the use of ordinary household purposes inside one single-family dwelling. Outside use for lawn and garden irrigation or watering of domestic animals is prohibited. E. The rate of pumping of the well shall be limited to 15 gallons per minute. 931254 f&C(fra% COLORADO November 16, 1993 Board of County Commissioners Weld County Centennial Center 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Subject: RE -1551 and RE -1556 Dear Commissioners: DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303)353-3345, OM 3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 1400 N. 17TH AVENUE GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 This request for Recorded Exemptions is submitted by Clair Orr. The parcels of land are contained entirely in the SW4 of Section 1, T6N, R65W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. The applicant split the land. into a north 80 acre parcel and a south 80 acres parcel. The parcels of land under consideration are located at the intersection of Weld County Road 47 and Weld County Road 72. This is the total contiguous land holdings of the applicant. Due to contiguous ownership and the location of these two applications staff wishes to recommend these Recorded Exemptions jointly to the Board of County Commissioners, The applicant concurred with this request. This proposal is to divide a 5 acre parcel with an existing dwelling from the north half of the section, and to divide a five 5 acre parcel with no improvements from the south half of the, section. The site is presently irrigated but is in grasses and weeds. North Weld County Water District currently serves proposed Lot A of RE -1551 and will be available for the remaining acres. This parcel does not fall within an Urban Growth Boundary. The Department of Planning Services bases it recommendation of concerns upon: Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan * Agricultural intent 931253 931254 tics -co r RECOMMENDATION, RE -1556 Ed Orr Page 2 CONSISTENCY WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN If this Recorded Exemption is granted the applicant is proposing to construct a center pivot irrigation system. With this system in place the existing farm ground will be made for more productive. However, in order to finance this system the applicant needs to sell the two corner pieces of land not served by the proposed sprinkler system. The Comprehensive Plan allows a lot within the A (Agricultural) zone district to be divided into two separate parcels provided the owner is selling off non- productive land for one single family dwelling. ACRXCULTURAL. ZONE INTENT The Agricultural Coals and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan encourage the preservation and expansion of prime agricultural land. With the addition of the sprinkler system the applicant is proposing to turn this non-productive farm ground into viable farm ground. Additionally, efficient and orderly development in the A (Agricultural) zone district is maintained by protecting the County's agricultural industry. The Agricultural goals of the Comprehensive Plan are further enhanced by allowing low density residential dwellings to occur on non - prime agricultural land. The Department of Planning Service concurs that this request does meet the standards for a Recorded Exemption as stated in the Comprehensive Plan and Section 11.4.4.1 - 11.4.4.6 of the Weld County Subdivision Ordinance. However, staff has concerns regarding the ability to ensure that the intent of this Recorded Exemption is carried out. In order to ensure the center point irrigation system is in place staff suggests with -holding all future building permits from the two proposed lots until the applicant can in fact substantiate that a center pivot irrigation system is or will be in place. Respectfully, MAA-A-4 — Moni Daniels -Mika Curre t Planner 9:1254 0 0 -1651 4 APPLICATION FOR RECORDED EXEMPTION PHONE: 353-3845, Ext. 3540 Department of Planning Services, 1400 N. 17th Avenue, Greeley, Colorado 80631 FOR PLANNING�j} PAATMF,NT USE ONLY: APPL. FEE Lb CASE NO. RECORDING FEE,, ZONING DISTRICT RECEIPT NO. J C)51 DATE APPL. CHECKED BY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT: (Print or type only except for required signatures) I (we), the undersigned hereby request that the following described property be designated a recorded exemption by the Wed County Board of County Commissioners. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: N 1/2 of the SW 1/4, Sec 1, T 6N, R65 W of the 6th P.M. TOTAL ACREAGE: 80 Has this property been divided from or had divided from it any other property since August 30, 1972? Yes No x Is this parcel of land under consideration the total contiguo applicant? Yes No x FEE OWNERS OF PROPERTY: Name: Clair B. Orr Address: Name: Address: 801 8th St., Suite 230, Greeley, Co Phone. !TOMS!, Phone: WATER SOURCE: Larger Parcel North Weld Smaller Parcel nomesti c Well TYPE OF SEWER: Larger Parcel proposedSepticSmaller Parcel Septic PROPOSED USE: Larger Parcel g? r„!tury Smaller ParcelRurai. Residence ACREAGE: Larger Parcel 75 Smaller Parcel 5 EXISTING DWELLINGS: (Yea or No) no (Yes or No) YoA I hereby depose and state under the penalties of perjury that all statements, proposals, and/or plans submitted with or contained within this application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. COUNTY OF WELD ) STATE OF COLORADO ) Signature' Owner or Authorized Agent _Subscribed an& sworn to before ma this Ce day of :('SEAL) My Commission Expires '7- t3 - L_)�1 , 19 93. Cm?. C--). _ Notary Public 931234 LylD. Nelson, Manager NDL/ds 'BOARD OF DIRECTORS ERNEST TIGGES GARY SIMPSON ERNEST ROSS W,M, MCKAY CHARLES ACHZIGER September 30., 1993 RE: Water Service • Dear Sirs, NORTH WELD tUNTY WATER DISTRICT HIGHWAY 85 • LUCERNE, COLORADO 80646 LYLE NELSON, MGR. P.O. BOX 58 • PHONE 356-3020 This letter is in response to your Tmquiry regarding water service to the following described property: N1 of the SWh of Section l -6N -65W 1. Water service is presently being provided to the above described property. 2. x Water service can be made available to the above described property provided all requirements of the District are satisfied. If contracts have not been consumated with North Weld County Water District within one year from date of this letter, this letter shall become null and void. Additional comments: Prices would include current price of a tap .($3750, price good for 30 days from the above date) and $3 p/ft for line extension. Sincerely, NORTH WELD C'UNTY ER DI TRICT• Clare Orr %1254 AE235203S B 1403 PLC 02352035 09/27/93 15;45 45.00 1/001 P 1121 NARY ANN FROMSTEIN CUM s RECORDER IMOD CO* -00 WARRANTY DEED Ij110S DEED.Nbae.. 24th Md September t93 . bole WILLIAM C. Toad and ROSE MARY THOMAS of 'Camay of Weld iodised Cow do, yeast W CLAIR B. ORR .en,.. bassi adds. a 801 8th Street, Suite 230 Greeley, Colorado 80631 of Ow Carey Weld WTTNL3StTTher , Tde gnaw fa d ra,d enss alto was d One Hundred Eighty Thousand and 00/100ths _—------ - Mums.Senaive Warflame.T dMA . a tasty floc sd,Wed.Md.dm peMasd..daepl.esM dos pe.w,lagna, ssbegein..d. many..downs,w.oasM.M ye..eWana, ostefo.0ad e aopey iyslw wkb inwmmea..ifenme,y..i- ad WW ca Cateyd Weld W swdW..beus Ma Township The N 1/2 of the SW 1/4 of Section 1, 6 North. Range 65 West of the 6th P.M. TOGETHER WITH two shares of the capital stock of the Owl Creek supply and Irrigation Co., two shares of the Larimer and Weld Irrigation Co., two shares of the LariRer and weld Reservoir Co.. and one share of the Windsor Reservoir and Canal Co. and one domestic well 061065ES RESERVING HWLVE]t, unto grantors, an undivided 1/2 interest in all oil, gas and other minerals presently owned by said grantors, if any, in, on, under, upon and that may be produced from said premises for a period of 10 years ending on Satiates 24, 2003. It is the intention that said undivided 1/2 interest as reserved hereby shell revert to the Grantee, his heirs, successors and or assigns. TOGETHER WITH the rights o f ocher miner als. egress necessary to explore for, mine and remove such oil, gas fni ss k @.. by saes &rd weber Jr Weld County Road 47, &I WO, CO. 80615 W Sloe of Colombo. nosh. I.I TOGETHER .ie an W .sole em S-.4...1 S end app man. memo 0.Iwsmt, or is S11yM gOwlmYmq. ad a sons lad menkw. elwndw and .eeWMe. Arms. mon W pans Sent, and BRIM ..was. ntM. this worm. claim W lewd .newer of a II ens, nos in Me veep" of. N and to a anonbeµmd ;sass. with a Moesames W eppwwslus. (I TO NAVE AND TO SOLD the mg P•""^ sbOin brewed and den -Abed, .M a .ppumfunces. wee a yens. Ms Mini W sirs knot. Ar4 the'moon Shuns:MIS. hews. and smarm) sproe'ai.s,doe.eaellem.V.nl, beaus ad Epos W.da y.'e•MMrtl I rim. OS mine ume danwlip end delivery °Nie pones, M swill sized atm PnanrsaboYennod. ba Revd.we. inalcal.ab•OnsoII ed iadi*uaeeewr of Wetsrn,dMo. ,s foss;.. adbagood njw.twit ppered haul ansmytp.at. bargain. sit nod merge s e I. i. ,nacre and lam is dnw.d, and the a one se Mt mnd Our hum ea toms W other rms. babas, ask., WM. ass. ..e..wrs. encumbrances mil nwe as. d WMe..r load or more ton.es sued general taxes..fOr 1993 and subsequent years; except easements, restrictions, covenants, conditions, reservations I' and rights of way of record, if any; except Oil and Gas Lease recorded December 8, 1992 in hook 1361 as Reception No. 02313707 TM gnaw shall W will WARRANT AND IOREVER DEPENDS..mboosenand wn m a emi.wkWe'.M t pee parson olds. pas, II Mahan solemn, wan* WW very press at pnw.slefrrlly classes dw whole many psnlher.d, snodat reenter than sandeapbasl. Oa plural a Wools. W the me or any rye AMR ti•Vpilimels loll rash. iI„ EN WITNESS WHERl•OR. y//.Ten b sc.r.l,. Om deed Ern Se doe ses (SW .MIS. I1 #/.4 L .. %//� ' Page 7149-9442 r li WILLIAM C. TlONA5 ROSE MARY =N4A5 II STATE OF COLORADO County of Weld TM faawins ,MwmeM WM acknowledged Mine w ea 24th day d September • N93 by William C. Stomas and Rose Mary Tomas My cmmiw.a. two OeCmybe5ji.. .l0 94 Snows. my Amid .nd a0k.d seal. : .........nab„'• 0.4 'If in Dower. insert -Coy pd s1 "r t .L...ed ANed n.— fee NMI C+. idle Ilrw.. a ieinab CMI Me. 932A. Rn.'1.S , W.aMyT' nab Ten N..ne Os* II,nIIM ronlowe .l#1 W.e S.. (Awe .COlO o2— .•.0\,1i :Mu 931254 BEC9RDED EXEMPTION oUESTioNt(RE 1. Explain the reason for the proposed recorded exemption and how each proposed lot will be used. This property is being proposed for a R.E. because it is not prime farm ground due to the slope and some seepy areas. To improve the farm the owner would like to construct a center pivot irrigation system. With this type of system the improvements will not be needed for the farming operation. The comprehensive plan states "the farmer who can't control costs can't survive." In an effort to reduce those costs the owner needs to sell improvements and five (5) acres. The smaller lot will be used for a rural residence with agricultural uses and activities. The larger lot will continue in a farming operation. 2. Describe the location, size and present use of the area where each proposed new lot will be created. This eighty acres is located in the N 1/2 of the SW 1/4, Sec 1, T6N, R65W of the 6th P.M. The present use is farm ground and a rural residence. 3. Explain how the proposal is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan and any adopted municipal plan, if applicable. This proposal is consistent with the policies of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan dueto the following: A. No lot has been created by a Recorded Exemption within the last five (5) years. B. It is in an agricultural district and the contiguous ownership is more than twice the minimum lot size, and C. Both lots shall have access from W.C.R. 47 which is a county road right of way. D. There will be no additional cost to Weld County Taxpayers and no additional public services will need to be provided. E. Constructing a center pivot irrigation system supports local agricultural industry: irrigation eg. companies, pipeline companies, the Public Service Company, and will make this a more productive farm. 9.;1254 • • F. The comprehensive plan encourages methods that will conserve soil and water. A sprinkler system will do both, save water and soil erosion. G. The comprehensive plan enables an owner to sell off non- productive farm land for a single family dwelling. There is already a single family dwelling on this non-productive farm land. 4. Explain how the uses permitted will be compatible with existing uses surrounding the proposed recorded exemption. The existing uses surrounding the proposed R.E. are agricultural uses, activities and compatible rural residences. These are the same uses proposed with the approval of this R.E.. 5. The intent of the agricultural zone is to preserve prime ag. land. This is not prime farm land and will not take any more land out of production. The intent of the agricultural zone is also to provide areas for ag. activities and uses. The approval of this R.E. will provide an area for such activities i.e. 4-H projects. 6. Explain how the proposal is consistent with efficient and orderly development. This proposal is consistent with the efficient development of the area because a sprinkler system is a more efficient use of our water resources and the smaller parcel with the rural residence is very similar to the other farm steads in the area which have been orderly developed apart from the farm making the farm operation more efficient. 7. Explain how adequate provision for the protection of the health, safety, and welfare of the inhabitants of the neighborhood and the County will be accomplished. There is nothing being proposed by this R.E. that would in any way reduce the current protection of the health, safety, and welfare of the inhabitants of the neighborhood or the county. 9a,1254 9:;1254 CERTIFICATE OF CONVEYANCES SERVICES STATE OF COLORADO ) COUNTY OF WELD ) Order 508293-A WELD COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING The TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE or ABSTRACT COMPANY hereby certifies that it has made a careful search of its records, and finds the following conveyances affecting the real estate described herein since August 30. 1972. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The N1/2 of the SW1/4 of Section 1, Township 6 North, Range 65 West of the 6th F.M., County of Weld, State of Colorado. CONVEYANCES (if none appear, so state): Reception No. 02352035 book 1403 Reception No. , Book Reception No. , Book Reception No. , Book Reception No. , Book Reception No. , Book Reception No. , Book Reception No. , Book This Certificate is made for the use and benefit of the Department of Planning Services of Weld County, Colorado. This Certificate is not to be construed as an Abstract of Title nor an opinion of Title, nor a guarantee Title, and the liability of TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY is hereby limited to the fee paid for this Certificate. In Witness Whereof, TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY has caused this certificate to be signed by its proper officer this 29th day of Segmember , A.D., 19 93. at 7:00 A.M. o'clock. TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY By: 924254 I Ott COLORADO • DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303)3534345. OCT. 3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 1400 N.17TH AVENUE GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 Date: October 15, 1993 CASE NUMBER: RE -1551 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from Clair Orr for a Recorded Exemption. The parcel of land is described as the N2 of the SW4 of Section 1, T6N, R65W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is north of the intersection of Weld County Road 47 and Weld County Road 72. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by October 29, 1993, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Monica Daniels -Mika, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: 3. We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Signed: Agency: Date: 9;1254 REFERRAL LIST NAME: Clair Orr REFERRALS SENT: October 15, 1993 COUNTY Attorney _Health Department Extension Service __Emergency Management Office Sheriff's Office Engineering Housing Housing Authority `Airport Authority Building Inspection CASE NUMBER: RE -1551 REFERRALS TO BE RECEIVED BY: October 29. 1993 STATE. )( Division of Water Resources Geological Survey Department of Health Department of Transportation _Historical Society __Water Conservation Board _Oil and Gas Conservation Commission FIRE_DISTRICTS ,Ault F-1 ,Berthoud F-2 Briggsdale F-24 _Brighton F-3 Eaton F-4 Fort Lupton F-5 Galeton F-6 Hudson F-7 Johnstown F-8 _~La Salle F-9 Mountain View F-10 _Milliken F-11 Nunn F-12 Pawnee F-22 'Platteville F-13 Platte Valley F-14 -`Poudre Valley F-15 �Raymer F-2 _Southeast Weld F-16 _Windsor/Severance F-17 Wiggins F-18 _Western Hills F-20 OTHER _Central Colo. Water Conservancy Dist. _Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. ,Tri-Area Planning Commission TOWNS angl CITIES `Ault Brighton Broomfield Dacono ____Eaton Erie Evans _Firestone ____Fort Lupton Frederick _Garden City Gilcrest ___ _Greeley Grover _Hudson ____Johnstown _Keenesburg __Kersey ____La Salle Lochbuie _Longmont _Mead Milliken ____New Raymer —Northglenn Nunn Pierce Platteville _Severance _Thornton Windsor COUNTIES _Adams _Boulder Larimer !EDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES `US Army Corps of Engineers ,USDA -APHIS Veterinary Service Federal Aviation Administration Federal Communication Commission SOIL CONSERVATION DISTRI Brighton _Fort Collins _Greeley Longmont West Adams COMMISSION/BOARD MEMBER 921254 October 15, 1993 Clair Orr 801 8th Street, Suite 230 Greeley, CO 80631 Subject: Recorded Exemption 1551. Dear Mr. Orr: Your recorded exemption application is complete and in order and will be processed on or before November 15, 1993. If it is determined that the application meets the approval criteria of the Weld County Subdivision Ordinance, you will be notified that the recorded exemption is approved. If the staff determines that the application does not meet the approval criteria, you will be notified and asked to appear before the Board of County Commissioners at a public hearing. You will be informed of the hearing date prior to the hearing. The Board of County Commissioners will then consider your application and make a final decision on the recorded exemption. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please call me. Sincerely, Monica Daniels -Mika Current Planner MDM/sfr D rtsna0 hoed &lk,0(r 10 _45-93 9"'1214 this Certificate. CERTIFICATE OF CONVEYANCES SERVICES STATE OF COLORADO ) COUNTY OF WELD ) The hereby certifies that following conveyances 1972. TRANSAMERICA Order No. 8508293-S WELD COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF MANNING it has made a careful search TITLE its INSURANCE or aCOMPANY affecting the real estate described herein since/ finds the , August 3O, LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The 51/2 of the SW1/4 of Section 1, Township 6 North, Range 65 West of the 6th P.M., County of Weld, State of Colorado. CONVEYANCES (if none appear, so state); Reception No. 02352036 Reception No. , Book Reception No. . Book Reception No. . Book Reception No. . Book Reception No. . Book Reception No. . Book Reception No. . Book . Book 1403 This Certificate is made for the use and benefit of the Department of Planning Services of Weld County, Colorado. This Certificate is not to be construed as an Abstract of Title nor an opinion of Title, nor a guarantee Title, and the liability of TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY is hereby limited to the fee paid for In Witness Whereof, TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE has caused this certificate to be ■igned by its COMPANY emberDroper officer lock th dayA.D., 1993. at 7:00 A.M. o'clock. TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 3y: UTNIa ZED SIGNATURE 931254 c r . • .1j+yy+l \ 1\ ` • ON CJ//I • • • \ t lel je •• "' • • . ... • •• • • .I . • .-. '.. l • \♦TRH- .laJ 11. • • : •to • n N 4 1 p • n1 q. .• \ I q ,• n \ r • • n •• 11 lJ nI » II i. •.+ Arc at/ o • li • '••1) / •• N.• )Y ll 1• ,• • •` ; ,yn • • - ' n\ ,0 d•' i. \ ): A/E • >• rR : )) • • .j a• 1 1 1 ]• • a :trarj la• a. .r Y n n 1 !• or•• . :;j.t Agee _ • I •loon•I (I- •l - Iy• i. a ' - -•• •• fb r C I: ; '• T_.'t-• 1. �'. •.I'� \'� I. • • n ~ + 3 LUCERNE Mu4 •.. I20 - rier II' • • • • •L/ • F• a • ••� •) a -I;• o• _ I) :OOnQI ' l• : • I •� \ i N •as •• • �,1r b. ,1 u h it \L* rv{:•• �/ V •w ^Py 1 Kw olcrOr :: ... y. ( Kr J { �,\ c w•• • r �r '. J... , _• en!)2~7 ` . ®•i �� • ' 142 cm •lj • s. • CREEL Y _ r • 'I oa Y .ice -• o a•. r✓� .I� •'i ow.i • fQt' I - � �••r•,. % ,1 `,, • I . • , �• ... '. ER! ne •r.• ' RP c -- la Y ., .: .j '�� J am•,•• •• Y•'r. o. a. . hiDe COLORADO December 1, 1993 Clair Orr 801 8th Street, #230 Greeley, CO 80631 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303)353034S, DR. 3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 1400 N. 17TH AVENUE GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 Subject: RE -1551 - Request for a Recorded Exemption on a parcel of land described as the N2 of the SW4 of Section 1, T6N, R65W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. Dear Mr. Orr: I have scheduled a meeting with the Board of County Commissioners on Wednesday, December 8, 1993, at 9:00 a.m. to consider your application. This meeting will take place in the County Commissioners' Hearing Room, first floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado. It is recommended that you or a representative be in attendance to answer any questions the Board of County Commissioners might have with respect to your application. The Department of Planning Services' staff will make a recommendation concerning this application to the Board of County Commissioners. It is the responsibility of the applicant to call the Department of Planning Services' office a few days before the date of the Commissioners' hearing to obtain the recommendation. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to call me. Respectfully, �I Mon ca Daniels -Mika Curr nt Planner MDM/sfr 921254 FIELD CHECK FILING NUMBER: RE -1551 APPLICANT'S NAME: Clair Orr REQUEST: A Recorded Exemption. DATE OF INSPECTION: October 27, 1993 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The N2 SW4 of Section 1, T6N, R65W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: North of the intersection of Weld County Road 47 and Weld County Road 72. LAND USE: N Agricultural production E Farm S Agricultural, rural residence W Agricultural land ZONING: N A (Agricultural) E A (Agricultural) S A (Agricultural) W A (Agricultural) COMMENTS: The soil appears very dry and in poor condition. Access is off of Weld County Road 47 a gravel County road. The site is presently in weeds. The site is a few feet higher than the road. The site plan is correct as supplied by the applicant. Monica Daniels -Mika'- J Current Planner 931254 '119€ COLORADO To mEmoRAnuum Weld County Planning D°t° November 5. 19 From Jeff Stoll, Director. Environmental Heal?' SuD�tCase Number: RE -1551 ,(1 Name: Orr, Clai PT N2, SW4, Section 01, Township 06 North, Range 65 West Environmental Protection Services has reviewed this proposal; the following conditions are recommended to be part of any approval: 1. A Weld County Septic Permit is required for the proposed home septic system and shall be installed according to the Weld County Individual Sewage Disposal Regulations. 2. Any existing septic system(s) which is not currently permitted through the Weld County Health Department will require an I.S.D.S. Evaluation prior to the issuance of the required septic permit(s). 3. It is the policy of this Division not to recommend for approval of any lot size less than one (1) acre, which will utilize an Individual Sewage Disposal System. 4. An Individual Sewage Disposal System must be located at least 100 feet from any well. 5. An Individual Sewage Disposal System permit must be finalized and approved by an Environmental Protection Specialist within one (1) year of the application date. JLS/tj-2297 Weld CountyNam(po 92,1254 RESOLUTION RE: APPROVAL OF RECORDED EXEMPTION NO. 1560 - MILL WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners, pursuant to its authority under Section 30-28-101(10)(d), CRS, as amended, did determine at a public meeting held in the Chambers of the Board, that a certain parcel of land, to be divided into two parcels, as shown on the plat known as Recorded Exemption No. 1560, does not come within the purview of the definition of the terms, "subdivision" and "subdivided land", and WHEREAS, the request for Recorded Exemption No. 1560 was submitted by Kevin and Vicki Mill for property which is located in part of the NE} of Section 8, Township 6 North, Range 66 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado, being more particularly described in the plat which shall be provided by the applicant and known as Exhibit "A", said plat to be recorded, and WHEREAS, this request is to divide the property into parcels estimated to be approximately 95 acres and 5 acres. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the hereinabove described parcel of land be, and hereby is, exempt from the definition of the terns, "subdivision" and "subdivided land". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that this approval is conditional upon the following: 1. A Weld County septic permit ;s required for the proposed home septic system and shall be installed according to the Weld County Individual Sewage Disposal System (ISDS) regulations. 2. An ISDS must be located at least 100 feet from any well. 3. An Individual Sewage Disposal System permit must be finalized and approved by an Environmental Protection Specialist within one (1) year of the application date. 4. Prior to recording the plat, a demolition permit shall be applied for and approved by a Weld County Building Inspector. 5. The applicant shall eliminate the first access to Lot B off Weld County Road 72 which is located east of Weld County Road 27. 931255 eszszpo Cc: P‘; f3PPl. RE: RE #1560 - MILL PAGE 2 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that the applicant shall submit a mylar plat to the Department of Planning Services to be recorded in the office of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. The plat shall be prepared in accordance with the requirements of Section 11.7 of the Weld County Subdivision Ordinance. The plat shall be submitted within sixty days from the date of approval by the Board of County Commissioners. The applicant shall be responsible for paying the recording fees. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 8th day of December, A.D., 1993. ATTEST: Weld County Clerk to the Board BY: eputy Clefk'to 3 APP AS TO FORM: /1eiL1 Count y Atto e y BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO 931255 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR RE -1560 1. A Weld County Septic Permit is required for the proposed home septic system and shall be installed according to the Weld County Individual Sewage Disposal Regulations. 2. An Individual Sewage Disposal System must be located at least 100 feet from any well. 3. An Individual Sewage Disposal System permit must be finalized and approved by an Environmental Protection Specialist within ono (1) year of the application date. 4. Prior to recording the plat a demolition permit shall be applied for and approved by a Weld County Building Inspector. ^L`Q. 4e-‘ 0-tit&Cq\C(4C+tic r ( Gtr lc L61 oFC WC-R1a la ed 931255 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303)353334E, EXT, 3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 1400 N,17TH AVENUE GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 November 18, 1993 County Commissioners Weld County Centennial Center 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Subject: RE -1560 Dear Commissioners: This request for a Recorded Exemption is submitted by Kevin and Vicki Mill. The parcel of land on which this proposal is being made is described as the NE4 of Section 8, T6N, R66W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. No dwelling currently exists on the 100 acre parcel. The property is located within the Urban Growth Boundary of the Town of Windsor. The Town of Windsor reviewed this application and found no conflict with its Comprehensive Plan. The request is to divide the total contiguous land holdings of the applicants into two parcels of 5 acres, more or less and 95 acres, more or less. The applicants are proposing to build a dwelling on the 5 acre parcel. This dwelling will replace a previous dwelling which has been demolished. Access to the existing parcels is provided from Weld County Road 29 and Weld County Road 72. North Weld County Water District has committed to provide service to the proposed parcels. Sewer service is provided by septic systems for both proposed lots. The Department of Planning Services' staff recommends denial of this request based upon: 1. Level of development and the potential for further development. 2. Adherence with the Comprehensive Plan. 931255 RECOMMENDATION, RE -156O Kevin and Vicki Mill Page 2 ADHERENCE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN It is the opinion of the Department of Planning Services' staff that this application does not meet the intent of the A (Agricultural) zone district. The A (Agricultural) zone district was established to maintain and enhance agricultural production. This request does not enhance agricultural production. The fact that this site housed a previous residential dwelling does not make the current request consistent with the A (Agricultural) zone district. On the contrary, this recorded exemption will enable two additional residential dwellings to occur in an urban sprawl area. Five acres may seem like a small price to pay for development, but all development inevitably has its cost. RECORDED EXEMPTION Table 1 DATE a b La_11 APPROVAL BY RE -666 4/5/85 .77 143.00 RE -780 7/11/85 3.72 BCC RE -834 1/16/86 2.29 183.38 SStaff RE -836 1/20/86 4.00 83.38 Staff RE -1017 5/4/87 4.58 77.89 Staff 152.42 RE -1222 11/8/89 5.00 Staff 80.70 RE -1353 5/21/91 5.5 BCC RE -1361 7/21/91 14.36 1 46.67 6.677 Denied RE -1463 11/19/92 6.42 BCC RE -1464 11/19/92 2.21 70.60 BCC 74.89 Ste 104.00 RE -1510 6/4/93 1.69 RE -1519 6/23/93 6.66Staff BCC CC B RE -1566 11/3/93 5.00 RE -1569 11/19/93 2.00 81.90 In Process 138.00 In Process 64.2 Acres 1520.31 Acres a - This figure is based on the land mass of Recorded Exemption Lot A's Only b - This figure is based on the land mass of Recorded Exemption Lot B's O'nly c - Section 5 has been divided into seven 80 acre parcels. 931255 RECOMMENDATION, RE -1560 Kevin and Vicki Mill Page 3 LEVEL OF DEVELOPMENT AND POTENTIAL FOR MORE DEVELOPMENT Since 1985 4X, more or less (64.2 acres) of farmland from Lot A's have been taken out of farm production. The Soil Conservation Services Major Resource Land Area 67 (which Weld County is a part) shows a loss of prime land for a five year time period (1982-1987) to be an average decrease of 1-2%. This figure is similar to the proposed area when only considering the farm land loss for Lots A of Recorded Exemption. When considering possible farm land loss for Lot B's, this figure would be considerably higher. The proposed division and existing land splits in this area do not represent efficient and orderly development. This is the 16th request for a recorded exemption within a six square mile area. All but one of these recorded exemptions have been approved. Recorded Exemption 1353 was denied by the Board of County Commissioners for: A: Evading the intent of the Weld County Subdivision Ordinance B: Inconsistency with efficient and orderly development C: Potential for future development to increase service demands Residential uses in rural areas necessitate an increased demand for public services. These services cost the taxpayers of Weld County scarce revenues. As urban sprawl areas continue it is the taxpayer who pays the burden for increased demand for services. The Department of Planning Services' staff suggests that the Board of County Commissioners determine if the standards of 11.5.1 through 11.5.6 of the Weld County Subdivision Ordinance have been meet. Respectfully. Mon ca Daniels -Mika Current Planner 9C12.55 c Co September 17. 1993 Department of Planning Services 1400 N 17th ave. Greeley, CO 806331 Gentlemen: I hereby authorize Scott Realty Co., 1212 9th Avenue, Greeley, Colorado, to represent our interest or to act in our behalf to sever a 5 acre improvement site from a 100 acre parcel which we own located in the NW1/4 of Section 8 T6N, R66W, of the 6th P.M. Wold County, in accordance with the Recorded Exemption process. 9724, Kevin Mill OCT 15 1993 Weldr �YP/8�pinp 931255 APPLICATION FOR RECORDED EXEMPTION PHONE: 353-3845, Ext. 3540 _'/ Department of Planning Services, 1400 N. 17th Avenue, Greeley, Colorado 80631 / FOR PLANNING DEPARTMENT USE ONLY; APPL. FEE CASE NO. RECORDING FEE _ ZONING DISTRICT RECEIPT NO. DATE APPL. CHECKED BY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT: (Print or type only except for required signatures) I (we), the undersigned hereby request that the following described property be designated a recorded exemption by the Weld County Board of County Commissioners. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 100 acres more or less, located in the Northwest 'A of Section 8, Township 6 North, Range 66 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado TOTAL ACREAGE: 100 mrrec mnra nr lace Has this property been divided from or had divided from it any other property since August 30, 1972? Yes XX No Is this parcel of land under consideration the total contiguous land owned by the applicant? Yes No_ xY FEE OWNERS OF PROPERTY: Name: Kevin W. Mill and Vicki B. Mill Address: 34749 WCR 99. Greeley. .Colorado 80631 Phone: 454-2406 Name: Address: Phone: WATER SOURCE: Larger Parcel NWCWD TYPE OF SEWER: Larger Parcel Septir PROPOSED USE: Larger Parcel C[np Prndurt`�pn ACREAGE: Larger Parcel 95 more or less EXISTING DWELLINGS: (Yes or No) No Smaller Parcel NWCWD Smaller Parcel soptir Smaller Parcel &evidential Smaller Parcel 5 more or less (Yes or No) Removed I hereby depose and state under the penalties of perjury that all statements, proposals, and/or plans submitted with or contained within this application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. COUNTY OF WELD ) STATE OF COLORADO ) 97 -e=t Signature: Owner or Authorized Agent Subscribed and sworn to before me this � day of �,,, ,, 1911. (SEAL) My Commission Expires vbA�ry}7.1fK Notary Public Betided T6n NOTARY NNW ACLVCT 9212si TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COXfln COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE A 1. Effective Date: September 8, 1993 at 7:00 ACommitment No.: 8033126 2. Policy or policies to be issued: Amount Premium A. ALTA Owner's Policy $ 50,000.00 $333.00 Proposed Insured: To Be Determined B. ALTA Loan Policy Proposed Insured: Certificate of Conveyance $50.00 3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this commitment and covered herein is fee simple and title thereto is at the effective date hereof vested in: Kevin 4. The land MAS/dk Mill and Vicki Mill, as joint tenants referred to in this commitment is described as follows: (SEE ATTACHED PAGE FOR LEGAL DESCRIPTION) TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY By Margaret A. Stephenson Authorised Signature Issued: September 16, 1993 931745 TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Commitment No.: 8033126 SCHEDULE A - Continued LEGAL DESCRIPTION All that part of the NW1/4 of Section 8, Township 6 North Range 66 West of the 6th P.M., County of Weld, State of Colorado, described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of said Section 8; thence in a Southerly direction along the West section line of said section, 1320 feet to the Southwest corner of the N1/2 of the NW1/4 of said section; thence North 88 degrees 22 minutes East, 1530 feet along the bank of present dividing lateral of said N1/2 of the NW1/4 of said section; thence South 45 degrees 30 minutes East, 660 feet to a large cottonwood tree on the North bank of present constructed lateral; thence South 60 degrees 50 minutes East, 655 feet; thence South 19 degrees 37 minutes East, 297 feet to a point on the North and South half section line of said section; thence in a Northerly direction along said North and South half section line 2425 feet, more or lees, to the North Quarter corner of said section - thence in a Westerly direction along the North section line of said section, 2655 feet, more or less, to the Point of Beginning; AND Including any part of the NE1/4 of said Section 8 lying West of but excluding any part of the Northwest Quarter lying East of the following described dividing line: Beginning at the North Quarter corner of said Section 8 and considering the North line of the NE1/4 to bear North 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East for the purpose of relating this dividing line to said North line only; thence Southerly along the East edge of an existing field by the following five (5) courses: South 09 degrees 08 minutes East, 301.5 feet; South 03 degrees 24 minutes West, 206.3 feet; South 20 degrees 22 minutes West, 243.4 feet; South 02 degrees 22 minutes East, 186.9 feet; South 12 degrees 27 minutes East, 644.5 feet; thence South 09 degrees 58 minutes West, 868.7 feet, more or less, to an existing fence corner and the Point of Termination. Page 2 93125:5 BOARD OF DIRECTORS . ERNEST TIGGES GARY SIMPSON ERNEST ROSS I W.M. MCKAY 1 • ; ' CHARLES ACHZIGER September 30, 1993 RE: Water Service Dear Sirs, NORTH WELD COUNTY WATER DISTRICT HIGHWAY 85 • LUCERNE, COLORADO 80646 LYLE NELSON, MGR. P.O. BOX 56 • PHONE 356-3020 This letter is in response to your inquiry regarding water service to the following described property: 1. NWk.of Section 8 -6N -66W Water service is presently being provided to the above described property. 2. X Water service can be made available to the above described property provided all requirements of the District are satisfied. If contracts have not been consumated with North Weld County Water District within one year from date of this letter, this letter shall become null and void. Additional comments: Sincerely, NORTH WELD COUNTY AT R ISTRICT. Lysc D. Nelson, Manager NDL/ds Pat McNear 931255 $$CORDED E7CENPTION OUESTIONNAYRR 1. Explain the reason for the proposed recorded exemption and how each proposed lot will be used. Proposed Lot "A" is a 5 acre site from which an old set of non-functional improvements have been demolished and removed. The site also includes a corner of a field which is not functional to farm and has been utilized as set aside land. The site has older elm trees located on it. The 5 acres is surplus non-productive land which hopefully can be utilized as a residential site and proposed Lot "B" will continue to be used for crop production. 2. Describe the location, size and present use of the area where each proposed new lot will be created. Proposed Lot "A" is located in the center of tie subject parcel on the north boundary fronting Weld County Road 7z. There is no current benificial use being derived from proposed Lot "A" and Lot "B" is utilized for crop production. 3. Explain how the proposal is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan and any adopted municipal plan, if applicable. Since proposed Lot "A" had previously been used as a residential site and the use of Lot "B" will not be changed their use, will be consistent with the county comprehensive plan and there is no municipal plan. 4. Explain how the uses permitted will be compatible with existing uses surrounding the proposed recorded exemption. The surrounding land uses are single family residential and agricultural uses. The current use of'Lots "A" and "B" has been single family and agricultural uses. ,,:Division of tie parcel will not change the use and will remain compatible with surrounding land uses. 5. Explain how the proposal is consistent with district it is located within. Since the uses will remain what they have been no change in zoning and will be consistent with district. the intent, of the zoning in the past it will require the intent of the Ag zoned 6. Explain how the proposal is consistent with efficient and orderly development. There are no major changes to the area caused by this proposal, therefore it will not impede orderly development. 7. Explain how adequate provision for the protection of the health, safety, and welfare of the inhabitants of,tite neighborhood and the County will be accomplished. Since there are no major changes to occur in the use and the property is not located oin flood plain - geologiecal hazard or the airprt overly dr.striCt thetoroposediusesshou die in wayhad adversely affect the health, safety,or welfare 9;12.55 mIIr Rung' N N N N 9212455 CERTIFICATE OF CONVEYANCES SERVICES STATE OF COLORADO ) COUNTY OF WELD ) WELD COUNTY DF2ARTMENT OF PlA NNINC The TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE or ABSTRACT COMPANY hereby certifies that it has made a careful search of its records, and finds the following conveyances affecting the real estate described herein since August 30, 1972. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SEE EXHIBIT A ATTACHED HERETO: CONVEYANCES (if none appear, so state): Reception No. 01923405 , Book 993 & re-recorded Reception No. 01935423 . Book 1003 Reception No. 01923406 , Book 993 Reception No. 01935423 Book 1004 Reception No. 01935425 Book 1004 Reception No. 01935426 . Book 1004 Reception No. 01940507 , Book 100/ Reception No. 01978773 , Book 1041 SEE NEXT SHEET FOR ADDITIONAL INSTRUMENTS: This Certificate is made for the use and benefit of the Department of Planning Services of Weld County, Colorado. This Certificate is not to be construed as an Abstract of Title nor an opinion of Title, nor a guarantee Title, and the liability of TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY is hereby limited to the fee paid for this Certificate. In Witness Whereof, TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY has caused this certificate to be signed by its proper officer this 8th day of September , A.D., 19 91 at 7:00 A.M. o'clock. TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 931255 CONVEYANCES - Continued Reception No. 01990838 , Book 1051 Reception No. 01995369 , Book 1055 Reception No. 02126562 , Book 1121 Reception No. 02128209 , Book 1123 Reception No. 02160887 , Book 1?1C Reception No. 02162195 , Book 1?1S Reception No. 02162607 , Book 171A Reception No. , Book Reception No. , Book Reception No. , Book Reception No. , Book Reception No. , Book Reception No. , Book Reception No. , Book Reception No. , Book Reception No. , Book Reception No. , Book Reception No. , Book Reception No. , Book Reception No. , Book 931255 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION All that part of the NW1/4 of Section 8, Township 6 North Range 66 West of the 6th P.M., County of Weld, State of Colorado, described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of said Section 8; thence in a Southerly direction along the West section line of said section, 1320 feet to the Southwest corner of the N1/2 of the NW1/4 of said section; thence North present dividing dlateral 2of2 msaid eN1/2 s East, N12of the 0NWl/4 of said hsection; thence South 45 degrees 30 minutes East, 660 feet to a large cottonwood tree on the North bank of present constructed lateral; thence South 60 degrees 50 minutes East, 655 feet; thence South 19 degrees 37 minutes East, 297 feet to a point on the North and South half section line of said section; thence in a Northerly direction along said North and South half section line 2425 feet, more or less, to the North Quarter corner of said section; thence in a Westerly direction along the North section line of said section, 2655 feet, more or less, to the Point of Beginning; AND Including any part of the NE1/4 of said Section 8 lying West of but excluding any part of the Northwest Quarter lying East of the following described dividing line: Beat theiNorth linehe ofNthehNE1/4t to bearer Northf s90ddeggrreesn08 and 0 minutes seconds East for the purpose of relating this dividing line to said North line only; thence following ufivel(5)along courses;East edge of an existing field by the South 09 degrees 08 minutes East, 301.5 feet; South 03 degrees 24 minutes West, 206.3 feet; South 20 degrees 22 minutes West, 243.4 feet; South 02 degrees 22 minutes East, 186.9 feet; South 12 degrees 27 minutes East, 644.5 feet; thence South 09 degrees 58 minutes West, 868.7 feet, more or less, to an existing fence corner and the Point of Termination. Page 2 9217.55 FIELD CHECK FILING NUMBER: RE -1560 DATE OF INSPECTION: October 26, 1993 APPLICANT'S NAME: Kevin and Vicki Mill REQUEST: A Recorded Exemption LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The NE4 of Section 8, T6N, R66W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: 32743 Weld County Road 29 (the intersection of Weld County Roads 24 and 72) LAND USE: N Corn E Agricultural production S Agricultural production/large residence W Agricultural production ZONING: COMMENTS: N A (Agricultural) E A (Agricultural) S A (Agricultural) W A (Agricultural) Access for this site is off of Weld County Road 72, a gravel County road. There is presently an access to this site. There are some topography drainage problems, associated with this site. The site is presently in farm production, this includes the smaller portion on the site which provides access to the site. This access goes around several large trees. The site appears to be -under contract. The majority of surrounding properties are currently in farm production. Monica Daniels -Mika, Current Planner 9''1255 Q, Milk COLORADO mEMORIAf DU To Weld County Planning Date November 9, 1993 From Jeff Stoll, Director, Environmental Health Sub)aetCase Number: RE -1560 Name: Mill, Kevin PT 08, Section 08, Township 06 North, Range 66 West Environmental Protection Services has reviewed this proposal; the following conditions are recommended to be part of any approval: 1. A Weld County Septic Permit is required for the proposed home septic system and shall be installed according to the Weld County Individual Sewage Disposal Regulations. 2. An Individual Sewage Disposal System must be located at least 100 feet from any well. 3. An Individual Sewage Disposal System permit must be finalized and approved by an Environmental Protection Specialist within one (1) year of the application date. JLS/ 931255 entrai COLORADO Date: October 19, 1993 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: t A) DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303)353-3845, EXT. 3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 1400 N. 17TH AVENUE GREEELEY, COLORADO 80631 CASE NUMBER: RE -1560 Enclosed is an application from Kevin and Vicki Mill for a Recorded Exemption. The parcel of land is described as the'NE4 of Section 8, TEN, R66W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is 34743 Weld County Road 29 (the southeast corner of the intersection of Weld County Roads 27 and 72). This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by November 2, 1993, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Monica Daniels -Mika, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above, 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2. 3.� We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Please refer to the enclosed letter, Signed gr. 41020,441Agency: Date: Weld Cow* Plain 9212,S5 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303) 353.3845. EXT. 3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 1400 N, 17TH AVENUE GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 COLORADO November 16, 1993 CASE NUMBER: SPR-204 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from Rocky Mountain Inspection Services,. Inc. for a Site Plan Review for an outdoor oil field tubular service, caretaker mobile home, and storage in the I-2 (Industrial) zone district. The parcel of land is described as Lot 4, SW4 NW4 and Lot 1, NW4 SW4 of Section 4, T5N, R65W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is adjacent to the City of Greeley, approximately 1/4 mile east of State Highway 85 and 500 feet north of State Highway 263. This,application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the .processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by November 30, 1993, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Monica Daniels -Mika, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: We have reviewed the request and interests. 1.4.,,sr find no conflicts with our -4ZxeCtea.c n rrv,"..e A O."wirmge. - 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Please refer tc he enclosed letter. Signed: Date: C. \\, Agency: c,.eCac „- \ - w1 N0V 1 9 1993 L 97.1;1945 . `�`ws1d County FIELD CHECK FILING NUMBER: RE -1560 DATE OF INSPECTION: October 26, 1993 APPLICANT'S NAME: Kevin and Vicki Mill REQUEST: A Recorded Exemption LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The NE4 of Section 8, T6N, R66W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: 32743 Weld County Road 29 (the intersection of Weld County Roads 29 and 72) LAND USE: N Corn £ Agricultural production S Agricultural production/large residence W Agricultural production ZONING: N A (Agricultural) E A (Agricultural) S A (Agricultural) W A (Agricultural) COMMENTS: Access for this site is off of Weld County Road 72, a gravel County road. There is presently an access to this site. There are some topography drainage problems associated with this site. The site is presently in farm production, this includes the smaller portion on the site which provides access to the site. This access goes around several large trees. The site appears to be under contract. The majority of surrounding properties are currently in farm production. Monica Daniels -Mika, urrent Planner 92)125 i • • mEmORAAnDUm Wire. COLORADO To Weld County Planning at' November 9, 1993 From Jeff Stoll, Director, Environmental Health 2j subonbase Number: RE -1560 Name: Mill, Kevin PT 08. Section 08, Township 06 North. Range 66 West Environmental Protection Services has reviewed this proposal; the following conditions are recommended to be part of any approval: 1. A Weld County Septic Permit is required for the proposed home septic system and shall be installed according to the Weld County Individual Sewage Disposal Regulations. 2. An Individual Sewage Disposal System must be located at least 100 feet from any well. 3. An Individual Sewage Disposal System permit must be finalized and approved by an Environmental Protection Specialist within one (1) year of the application date. JLS/ 931255 arri; 1111111e COLORADO Date: October 19, 1993 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303) 35W(145. EXT. 3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 1400 N. 17TH AVENUE GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 CASE NUMBER: RE -156O Enclosed is an application from Kevin and Vicki Mill for a Recorded Exemption. The parcel of land is described as the NE4 of Section 8, T6N, R66W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is 34743 Weld County Road 29 (the southeast corner of the intersection of Weld County Roads 27 and 72). This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by November 2, 1993, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Monica Daniels -Mika, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: 3.y We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: Please refer to the enclosed letter. WM Conti PIk* 931255 r a WII1Dc. COLORADO November 16, 1993 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303) 353-3945, EXT. 3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 1400 N. 17TH AVENUE GREELEY, COLORADO 80831 CASE NUMBER: SPR-204 Enclosed is an application from Rocky Mountain Inspection Services, Inc. for a Site Plan Review for an outdoor oil field tubular service, caretaker mobile home, and storage in the I-2 (Industrial) zone district. The parcel of land is described as Lot 4, SW4 NW4 and Lot 1, NW4 SW4 of Section 4, T5N, R65W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is adjacent to the City of Greeley, approximately 1/4 mile east of State Highway 85 and 500 feet north of State Highway 263. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by November 30, 1993, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Monica Daniels -Mika, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: 3. ' We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. -.-r C�iyp`_� uams �1ic�ac Ctirr-��+c*ei 9��a,.e» 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Please refer t Signed: Date: he enclosed letter. Agency :y.p..:__ 4- `n ea��3 c�.e IC 931?. 05.45M-41TI- Nov 191993 w.idratyPain Land owners in Township 6 North, Range 66 West Mike Guttersen Bill Shutz Chris and Kathy Doering Ruben Hergert Tom Trostel Steve Ulrich Keith Behrman Henry Schafer Perry Haythorn Bob Seyfried Luke Lind Gene Oblander Joe Hoff Doris Carpenter Patrick McNear Dean Severin Frank Booth Gary Booth Section 5 Section 9 Section 5 Section 8 & 16 Section 9 Section 17 Section 17 Section 7 Section 4 Section 4 Section 6 Section 9 Section 9 Section 9 Section 9 Section 4 Section 8 Section 5 9 7,1255 Land owners in Township 6 North, Range 66 West Mike Guttersen Bill Shutz Chris and Kathy Doering Ruben Hergert Tom Trostel Steve Ulrich Keith Behrman Henry Schafer Perry Haythorn Bob Seyfried Luke Lind Gene ()blander Joe Hoff Doris Carpenter Patrick McNear Dean Severin Frank Booth Gary Booth ElEXHIBIT Pc -4(66o I Section 5 Section 9 Section 5 Section 8 & 16 Section 9 Section 17 Section 17 Section 7 Section 4 Section 4 Section 6 Section 9 Section 9 Section 9 Section 9 Section 4 Section 8 Section 5 931255 ter,MEMORAnDU WilOc. Constance L. Harbert, Chairman , 19 7o Board of County Commissioners004, December 13, 1•• y COLORADO John S. Pickle, M.S.E.H., Director, W.C.H,'13` ��✓- From Bubb Sampling and Analysis of Pollutant Discharge Agreement Enclosed for Board approval are Purchase of Services Agreements between the Weld County Health Department and the following: Alberts Water/Wastewater Bucklen Equipment Company, Inc. City of Longmont - Union Reservoir Fort Lupton, City of Greeley Washout Hewlett Packard Idaho Creek Resource Lake View Village Laku Landing Poudre Tech Aggregates, Inc. for the sampling and analysis of pollutant discharge. All contracted fees are in accordance with the fees established in County Ordiance #82-M. The term of the agreement shall be from January 1, 1994, through December 31, 1994. I would recommend approval of these contracts. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. JSP/lam-2419 931260 ^!1 DEC OM POLLUTANT DISCHARGE AGREEMENT FOR THE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS OF POLLUTANT DISCHARGE BY THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT ioM „THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this i p — day of 2,ds0a,(i✓ 19 93 , by and between the POUDRE TECH AGGREGATES, INC. , whose address is , hereinafter referred to as "System," and the County of Weld, State of Colorado, by and through the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, on behalf of the Weld County Health Department, whose office is located at 1517 16th Avenue Court, Greeley, Colorado 80631, hereinafter referred to as "Health Department." WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B authorizes the Weld County Health Department to perform by agreement the testing of drinking water for suppliers thereof and the testing of pollutant discharges for those persons and entities holding permits to discharge pollutants into state waters, and WHEREAS, Health Department possesses the necessary equipment and expertise required to perform the sampling and analysis of the water for System as required by federal law, and WHEREAS, the services provided by Health Department pursuant to this Agreement shall benefit the health, safety, and welfare of those persons residing within the area served by System. NOW. THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: Section 1 - Authorization to Act: The System hereby authorizes the Health Department to perform the services listed in this Agreement and in Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B, for the testing of water on behalf of System. The provisions of Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B are incorporated herein in their entirety. Health Department shall act as an independent contractor in relation to the System in the performance of the services set forth in this Agreement. None of the Health Department employees and/or agents shall become employees of System, and no employees of System shall be deemed or become employees of the Health Department by virtue of this Agreement. Section 2 - Term: This Agreement shall become effective on January 1. 1994, and shall remain in full force and effective until December 31, 1994, unless and until otherwise terminated sooner, pursuant to the provisions of Section 5 below. Page 1 of 3 931260 Poudre Tech Aggregates, Inc. Agreement for the Sampling and Analysis of Pollutant Discharge Section 3 - Services to be Provided by Health Department: Health Department agrees to provide the following services to System during the term of this Agreement: Type of Test pH Chemical Oil & Grease Visual Oil & Grease Total Suspended Solids Contracted Number of Samples Contracted Fee As Submitted $ 1.25 each 36.75 1.25 6.00 Methods used by Health Department in providing said services shall be in accordance with Section I(b) of the Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B. Health Department shall provide further services as mutually agreed upon by Health Department and System at times and for compensation as agreed to by the parties hereto. By signing this Agreement and providing the services herein, Health Department does not insure the accuracy of the results of any tests performed by Health Department and does not make any representations as to the adequacy of Systems compliance with federal or state law governing the sampling and analysis requirements of Pollutant Discharge. Section 4 - Release and Hold Harmless: The System agrees to release and hold harmless Health Department from any and all liability and/or damages resulting from the acts or omissions of Health Department in performing the services set forth in this Agreement. Section 5 - Termination: Either party may terminate this Agreement upon 30 days written notice to the other party at the addresses set forth below. Section 6 - Obligations and Duties of System: System shall perform all of the obligations and duties set forth in Section II(c) of Weld County Ordinance 60-B. In addition, System shall pay for the services rendered by Health Department pursuant to this Agreement according to the contracted amount set forth in Section 3, above, and/or as may be mutually agreed to by the parties hereto. Payment shall be due within ten (10) days upon of receipt of the bill. Billing will be sent within ten (10) days of the quarter ending; i.e., March 31, June 30, September 30, and December 31, 1994. Section 7 - Waiver of Immunities/Duty of Care: No portion of this Agreement shall be deemed to constitute a waiver of any immunities the parties or their officers or employees may now possess, nor shall any portion of this Agreement be deemed to or created a duty of care with the respect to any persons not a party to this Agreement. Page 2 of 3 931260 le •. W Poudre Tech Aggregates, Inc. Agreement for the Sampling and Analysis of Pollutant Discharge Section 8 - Severability: If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of the Agreement is for any reason held or decided to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions hereof. The parties hereto declare that they would have entered into this Agreement and each and every section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, and phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsection, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, or phrases may be declared to be unconstitutional or invalid. Section 9 - Notices: All notices to the parties shall be sent to the following: Entity: Poudre Tech Agrregate, Inc. Contact Person: Martin Lind Address: P. 0. Box 1727 City, State, Zip: Greeley, CO 80632 Phone: (303) 356-3611 Entity: Weld County Health Department Contact Person: Judy Schmidt Address: 1517 16th Avenue Court City, State, Zip: Greeley, CO 80631 Phone: (303)353-0635 extension 2249 Signed this 3 day of Sett_ BY: - /Ln , 19 175 Our rY .A QED, , COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO BY SYSTEM AND THROUGH THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY ON BEHALF OF THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT TITLE OF AUTHORITY: BY: ( 4zo7T.7*,-,- �../ ! airman c. 4€ - /02//3/45 ATTES : Weld' aunty, Clerk to the If goidien BY: Deputy Clerk t. t e Boar Approved by: WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT 9. Pickle, M.S.E.H. D rector Weld County Health Department Page 3 of 3 931260 • r- --i r'1r�e-o-, -,r' �. inf '1 II DEC U6 POLLUTANT DISCHARGE AGREEMENT FOR THE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS OF POLLUTANT DISCHARGE BY THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this a 9 day of frarie n 6e. , 19 9.1,by and between the LAKU LANDING , whose address is Po, Dote ote 97a.. WL;ripe C. Posro . hereinafter referred to as "System." and the County of Weld, State of Colorado, by and through the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, on behalf of the Weld County Health Department, whose office is located at 1517 16th Avenue Court, Greeley, Colorado 80631, hereinafter referred to as "Health Department." WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B authorizes the Weld County Health Department to perform by agreement the testing of drinking water for suppliers thereof and the testing of pollutant discharges for those persons and entities holding permits to discharge pollutants into state waters, and WHEREAS, Health Department possesses the necessary equipment and expertise required to perform the sampling and analysis of the water for System as required by federal law, and WHEREAS, the services provided by Health Department pursuant to this Agreement shall benefit the health, safety, and welfare of those persons residing within the area served by System. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: Section 1 - Authorization to Act: The System hereby authorizes the Health Department to perform the services listed in this Agreement and in Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B, for the testing of water on behalf of System. The provisions of Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B are incorporated herein in their entirety. Health Department shall act as an independent contractor in relation to the System in the performance of the services set forth in this Agreement. None of the Health Department employees and/or agents shall become employees of System, and no employees of System shall be deemed or become employees of the Health Department by virtue of this Agreement. Section 2 - Term: This Agreement shall become effective on January 1, 1994, and shall remain in full force and effective until December 31, 1994, unless and until otherwise terminated sooner, pursuant to the provisions of Section 5 below. Page 1 of 3 931260 Laku Landing Agreement for the Sampling and Analysis of Pollutant Discharge Section 3 - Services to be Provided by Health Department: Health Department agrees to provide the following services to System during the term of this Agreement: Type of Test Bacteriological (Fecal coliform) Contracted Number of Samples Contracted Fee One per Month (May thru September) 22.30 each Methods used by Health Department in providing said services shall be in accordance with Section I(b) of the Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B. Health Department shall provide further services as mutually agreed upon by Health Department and System at times and for compensation as agreed to by the parties hereto. By signing this Agreement and providing the services herein, Health Department does not insure the accuracy of the results of any tests performed by Health Department and does not make any representations as to the adequacy of Systems compliance with federal or state law governing the sampling and analysis requirements of Pollutant Discharge. Section 4 - Release and Hold Harmless: The System agrees to release and hold harmless Health Department from any and all liability and/or damages resulting from the acts or omissions of Health Department in performing the services set forth in this Agreement. Section 5 - Termination: Either party may terminate this Agreement upon 30 days written notice to the other party at the addresses set forth below. Section 6 - Obligations and Duties of System: System shall perform all of the obligations and duties set forth in Section II(c) of Weld County Ordinance 60-B. In addition, System shall pay for the services rendered by Health Department pursuant to this Agreement according to the contracted amount set forth in Section 3, above, and/or as may be mutually agreed to by the parties hereto. Payment shall be due within ten (10) days upon of receipt of the bill. Billing will be sent within ten (10) days of the month ending. Section 7 - Waiver of Immunities/Duty of Care: No portion of this Agreement shall be deemed to constitute a waiver of any immunities the parties or their officers or employees may now possess, nor shall any portion of this Agreement be deemed to or created a duty of care with the respect to any persons not a party to this Agreement. Page 2 of 3 931260 BY: Laku Landing Agreement for the Sampling and Analysis of Pollutant Discharge Section 8 - Severability: If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of the Agreement is for any reason held or decided to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions hereof. The parties hereto declare that they would have entered into this Agreement and each and every section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, and phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsection, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, or phrases may be declared to be unconstitutional or invalid. Section 9 - Notices: All notices to the parties shall be sent to the following: Entity: Laku Landing Contact Person: Randy Nolking Address: P. 0. Box 332 City, State, Zip: Windsor, CO 80550 Phone: (303) 353-3750(W); 353-3213 (H) Signthis 9 day o /�ycinOse / "SYSTEM" TITLE OF AUTHORITY: 7;f4e-, 0}4 441 LimicAf Entity: Weld County Health Department Contact Person: Judy Schmidt Address: 1517 16th Avenue Court City, State, Zip: Greeley, CO 80631 Phone: (303)353-0635 extension 2249 , 1993. COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO BY AND THROUGH THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY ON BEHALF OF THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPAR A ST: /W,elgq`/��,-Co y Clerk to the I /PocYCN-/ /I eputy Clerk o e Board.= Approved by: WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT Jo S. Pickle, M.S. .H Director Weld County Health Department Page 3 of 3 921260 POLLUTANT DISCHARGE AGREEMENT FOR THE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS OF POLLUTANT DISCHARGE BY THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 7 day of /J/QU, , 19 q3 , by and between the LAKE VIEW VILLAGE , whose address is 64141416`.40;067 FiiniAlcfly 1404m404;4°, ROSa3 , hereinafter referred to as "System," J and the County of Weld, State of Colorado, by and through the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, on behalf of the Weld County Health Department, whose office is located at 1517 16th Avenue Court, Greeley, Colorado 80631, hereinafter referred to as "Health Department." WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B authorizes the Weld County Health Department to perform by agreement the testing of drinking water for suppliers thereof and the testing of pollutant discharges for those persons and entities holding permits to discharge pollutants into state waters, and WHEREAS, Health Department possessesthe necessary equipment and expertise required to perform the sampling and analysis of the water for System as required by federal law, and WHEREAS, the services provided by Health Department pursuant to this Agreement shall benefit the health, safety, and welfare of those persons residing within the area served by System. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: Section 1 - Authorization to Act: The System hereby authorizes the Health Department to perform the services listed in this Agreement and in Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B, for the testing of water on behalf of System. The provisions of Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B are incorporated herein in their entirety. Health Department shall act as an independent contractor in relation to the System in the performance of the services set forth in this Agreement. None of the Health Department employees and/or agents shall become employees of System, and no employees of System shall be deemed or become employees of the Health Department by virtue of this Agreement. Section 2 - Term: This Agreement shall become effective on January 1, 1994, and shall remain in full force and effective until December 31, 1994. unless and until otherwise terminated sooner, pursuant to the provisions of Section 5 below. Page 1 of 3 931260 Lake View Village Agreement for the Sampling and Analysis of Pollutant Discharge Section 3 - Services to be Provided by Health Department: Health Department agrees to provide the following services to System during the term of this Agreement: Type of Test Contracted Number of Samples Contracted Fee Bacteriological One per month (May thru $23.30 each (Fecal Coli£orm) September) Methods used by Health Department in providing said services shall be in accordance with Section I(b) of the Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B. Health Department shall provide further services as mutually agreed upon by Health Department and System at times and for compensation as agreed to by the parties hereto. By signing this Agreement and providing the services herein, Health Department does not insure the accuracy of the results of any tests performed by Health Department and does not make any representations as to the adequacy of Systems compliance with federal or state law governing the sampling and analysis requirements of Pollutant Discharge. Section 4 - Release and Hold Harmless: The System agrees to release and hold harmless Health Department from any and all liability and/or damages resulting from the acts or omissions of Health Department in performing the services set forth in this Agreement. Section 5 - Termination: Either party may terminate this Agreement upon 30 days written notice to the other party at the addresses set forth below. Section 6 - Obligations and Duties of System: System shall perform all of the obligations and duties set forth in Section 11(c) of Weld County Ordinance 60-B. In addition, System shall pay for the services rendered by Health Department pursuant to this Agreement according to the contracted amount set forth in Section 3, above, and/or as may be mutually agreed to by the parties hereto. Payment shall be due within ten (10) days upon of receipt of the bill. Billing will be sent within ten (10) days of the quarter ending; i.e., March 31, June 30, September 30, and December 31, 1994. Section 7 - Waiver of Immunities/Duty of Care: No portion of this Agreement shall be deemed to constitute a waiver of any immunities the parties or their officers or employees may now possess, nor shall any portion of this Agreement be deemed to or created a duty of care with the respect to any persons not a party to this Agreement. Page 2 of 3 931260 Lake View Village Agreeennystor the �Disccad harg Analysis ofPollutant e Section 8 - Severabilit : If any section, subsection, clause, or phrase of the Agreement is for any reason heldordecided aph, sentence. ocbe invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions hereof. The parties hereto declare that they would have entered into this Agreement and each and every section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, and phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsection, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, or phrases may be declared to be unconstitutional or inva:id. Section 9 - Notices: All notices to the parties shall be sent to the following: Entity: LakeviewVillage Contact Person: Jeff Te le Address: 7067 Fairwa s City, State, Zip: Lon ont CO 80503 Phones 303 444-4505 TITLE OF AUTHORITY: Entity: Weld Counthty HealDepartment Contact Person:SC u ci'dt Address: 1517 16th Avenue Court City, State, Zip: Greele CO 80631 Phone: 303 333-0635 extension 2249 , 1911. COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO BY AND THROUGH THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY ON BEHALF OF THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMEN- BY: Chairman /a2/3/q3 ATTESA Weld C unty Jerk to the BY: D. y Clerk o the Boa Approved by: WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT . Pickle, M.S.E.H. rector Weld County Health Department Page 3 of 3 931260 i.� POLLUTANT DISCHARGE AGREEMENT FOR THE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS OF POLLUTANT DISCHARGE BY THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this iJ e— day of d 9 , by and between the IDAHO CREEK RESOURCE , whose address is . hereinafter referred to as "System," and the County of Weld, State of Colorado, by and through the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, on behalf of the Weld County Health Department, whose office is located at 1517 16th Avenue Court, Greeley, Colorado 80631, hereinafter referred to as "Health Department." WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B authorizes the Weld County Health Department to perform by agreement the testing of drinking water for suppliers thereof and the testing of pollutant discharges for those persons and entities holding permits to discharge pollutants into state waters, and WHEREAS, Health Department possesses the necessary equipment and expertise required to perform the sampling and analysis of the water for System as required by federal law, and WHEREAS, the services provided by Health Department pursuant to this Agreement shall benefit the health, safety, and welfare of those persons residing within the area served by System. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: Section 1 - Authorization to Act: The System hereby authorizes the Health Department to perform the services listed in this Agreement and in Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B, for the testing of water on behalf of System. The provisions of Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B are incorporated herein in their entirety. Health Department shall act as an independent contractor in relation to the System in the performance of the services set forth in this Agreement. None of the Health Department employees and/or agents shall become employees of System, and no employees of System shall be deemed or become employees of the Health Department by virtue of this Agreement. Section 2 - Term: This Agreement shall become effective on January 1, 1994, and shall remain in full force and effective until December 31, 1994, unless and until otherwise terminated sooner, pursuant to the provisions of Section 5 below. Page 1 of 3 921260 • . Idaho Creek Resource Agreement for the Sampling and Analysis of Pollutant Discharge Section 3 - Services to be Provided by Health Department: Health Department agrees to provide the following services to System during the term of this Agreement: Type of Test Effluent PH Chemical Oil & Grease Visual Oil & Grease Total Suspended Solids Sampling Fee rr r :, ^ degill r_ nee o"eCM Contracted Number of Samples Contracted Fee As Requested $ 1.25 each $36.75 $ 1.25 " ^ $ 6.00 ^ $35.00/hour Methods used by Health Department in providing said services shall be in accordance with Section I(b) of the weld County Ordinance No. 60-B. Health Department shall provide further services as mutually agreed upon by Health Department and System at times and for compensation as agreed to by the parties hereto. By signing this Agreement and providing the services herein, Health Department does not insure the accuracy of the results of any tests performed by Health Department and does not make any representations as to the adequacy of Systems compliance with federal or state law governing the sampling and analysis requirements of Pollutant Discharge. Section 4 - Release and Hold Harmless: The System agrees to release and hold harmless Health Department from any and all liability and/or damages resulting from the acts or omissions of Health Department in performing the services set forth in this Agreement. Section 5 - Termination: Either party may terminate this Agreement upon 30 days written notice to the other party at the addresses set forth below. Section 6 - Obligations and Duties of System: System shall perform all of the obligations and duties set forth in Section II(c) of Weld County Ordinance 60-B. In addition, System shall pay for the services rendered by Health Department pursuant to this Agreement according to the contracted amount set forth in Section 3, above, and/or as may be mutually agreed to by the parties hereto. Payment shall be due within ten (10) days upon of receipt of the bill. Billing will be sent within ten (10) days of the quarter ending: i.e.. March 31, June 30, September 30, and December 31, 1994. Section 7 - Waiver of Immunities/Duty of Care: No portion of this Agreement shall be deemed to constitute a waiver of any immunities the parties or their officers or employees may now possess, nor shall any portion of this Agreement be deemed to or created a duty of care with the respect to any persons not a party to this Agreement. Page 2 of 3 931260 Idaho Creek Resource and AnalysisAgreement Pollutant for the SampDischarge Section 8 - Severabilit : If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of the Agreement is for any reason held or decided to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions hereof. The parties hereto declare that they would have entered into this Agreement and each and every section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, and phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsection, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, or phrases may be declared to be unconstitutional or invalid. Section 9 - Notices: All notices to the Entity: Idaho Creek Resource Contact Person: Bill Kobobel Address: 7909 Weld County Road 5 City, State, Zip: Longmont, CO 80504 Phone: (303) 772-6916 / (303) 530-1539 Signed this 3e day of A(ad BY: "SYSTEM" TITLE OF AUTHORITY: &ZAPeWAS parties shall be sent to the following: Entity: Weld County Health Department Contact Person: Judy Schmidt Address: 1517 16th Avenue Court City, State, Zip: Greeley, CO 80631 Phone: (303)353-0635 extension 2249 , 19, 5,3 . COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO BY AND THROUGH THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY ON BEHALF OF THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT BY: ! x100.4 ,.eat , Chairman ATTES BY: a /d2/3/93 : Weld County Clerk to the eputy Cle k o he Board Approved by: WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT S. Pickle, M.S.E.H. rector Weld County Health Department Page 3 of 3 921260 k N0V 2.3;16011) WELD CO. HEALTH DEPT. AGREEMENT FOR THE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS OF POLLUTANT DISCHARGE BY THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT POLLUTANT DISCHARGE THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 22ND day of November 1993 , by and between the HEWLETT PACKARD whose address is 700 71st Ave., Greeley, CO 80634 , hereinafter referred to as "System," and the County of Weld, State of Colorado, by and through the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, on behalf of the Weld County Health Department, whose office is located at 1517 16th Avenue Court, Greeley, Colorado 80631, hereinafter referred to as "Health Department." WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B authorizes the Weld County Health Department to perform by agreement the testing of drinking water for suppliers thereof and the testing of pollutant discharges for those persons and entities holding permits to discharge pollutants into state waters, and WHEREAS, Health Department possesses the necessary equipment and expertise required to perform the sampling and analysis of the water for System as required by federal law, and WHEREAS, the services provided by Health Department pursuant to this Agreement shall benefit the health, safety, and welfare of those persons residing within the area served by System. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: Section 1 - Authorization to Act: The System hereby authorizes the Health Department to perform the services listed in this Agreement and in Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B, for the testing of water on behalf of System. The provisions of Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B are incorporated herein in their entirety. Health Department shall act as an independent contractor in relation to the System in the performance of the services set forth in this Agreement. None of the Health Department employees and/or agents shall become employees of System, and no employees of System shall be deemed or become employees of the Health Department by virtue of this Agreement. Section 2 - Term: This Agreement shall become effective on January 1, 1994, and shall remain in full force and effective until December 31, 1994, unless and until otherwise terminated sooner, pursuant to the provisions of Section 5 below. Page 1 of 3 921260 Hewlett Packard Agreement for the Sampling and Analysis of Pollutant Discharge Section 3 - Services to be Provided by Health Department: Health Department agrees to provide the following services to System during the term of this Agreement: Type of Test Contracted Number of Samples pH Effluent Oil & Grease (Chemical) Effluent - SOD Effluent-Hexavalent Chromium One sample per month One sample per month One sample per month One sample per month Contracted Fee $ 1.25 each $36.75 each $12.70 each $10.00 each Methods used by Health Department in providing said services shall be in accordance with Section I(b) of the Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B. Health Department shall provide further services as mutually agreed upon by Health Department and System at times and for compensation as agreed to by the parties hereto. By signing this Agreement andproviding the services herein, Health Department does not insure the accuracy of the results of any tests performed by Health Department and does not make any representations as to the adequacy of Systems compliance with federal or state law governing the sampling and analysis requirements of Pollutant Discharge. Section 4 - Release and Hold Harmless: The System agrees to release and hold harmless Health Department from any and all liability and/or damages resulting from the acts or omissions of Health Department in performing the services set forth in this Agreement. Section 5 - Termination: Either party may terminate this Agreement upon 30 days written notice to the other party at the addresses set forth below. Section 6 - Obligations and Duties of System: System shall perform all of the obligations and duties set forth in Section II(c) of Weld County Ordinance 60-B. In addition, System shall pay for the services rendered by Health Department pursuant to this Agreement according to the contracted amount set forth in Section 3, above, and/or as may be mutually agreed to by the parties hereto. Payment shall be due within ten (10) days upon of receipt of the bill. Billing will be sent within ten (10) days of the quarter ending; i.e., March 31, June 30, September 30, and December 31, 1994. Section 7 - Waiver of Immunities/Duty of Care: No portion of this Agreement shall be deemed to constitute a waiver of any immunities the parties or their officers or employees may now possess, nor shall any portion of this Agreement be deemed to or created a duty of care with the respect to any persons not a party to this Agreement. Page 2 of 3 921260 Hewlett Packard Agreement for the Sampling and Analysis of Pollutant Discharge Section 8 - Severabilit : If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of the Agreement is for any reason held or decided to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions hereof. The parties hereto declare that they would have entered into this Agreement and each and every section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, and phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsection, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, or phrases may be declared to be unconstitutional or invalid. Section 9 - Notices: All Entity: Hewlett Packard Contact Person: Jud LeBlanc Address: 700 71st Avenue City, State, Zip: Greele CO 80634 Phone: 303 350 notices to the Signed this jump day of BY: TITLE OF AUTHORITY: Environmental Health & Safety Manager parties shall be sent to the following: Entity:atuntyNealthDenartment Contact Person: Jud Schmidt Address: 1517 16th Avenue Court City, State, Zip: Greele Co 80631 Phone: 303 353-0636 extension 2249 November , 19 93 . COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO BY AND THROUGH THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY ON BEHALF OF THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT BY: Chairman 42 — / 93 ATTF T: WeldkounClerk to the Deputy 1C erk to the Boeat'ard Approved by: WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT Pickle, M.S.E.H. irector Weld County Health Department Page 3 of 3 921260 At SOY 2 91993 jl„ POLLUTANT DISCHARGE AGREEMENT FOR THE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS OF POLLUTANT DISCHARGE BY THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this - .Jday of 417r J 19q3 , by and between t e GREELEY WASHOUT , whose address is S,K 3$6 a),LA P'"'-?.rossc , hereinafter referred to as "System," and the County of Weld, State of Colorado, by and through the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, on behalf of the Weld County Health Department, whose office is located at 1517 16th Avenue Court, Greeley, Colorado 80631, hereinafter referred to as "Health Department." WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B authorizes the Weld County Health Department to perform by agreement the testing of drinking water for suppliers thereof and the testing of pollutant discharges for those persons and entities holding permits to discharge pollutants into state waters, and WHEREAS, Health Department possesses the necessary equipment and expertise required to perform the sampling and analysis of the water for System as required by federal law, and WHEREAS, the services provided by Health Department pursuant to this Agreement shall benefit the health, safety, and welfare of those persons residing within the area served by System. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: Section 1 - Authorization to Act: The System hereby authorizes the Health Department to perform the services listed in this Agreement and in Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B, for the testing of water on behalf of System. The provisions of Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B are incorporated herein in their entirety. Health Department shall act as an independent contractor in relation to the System in the performance of the services set forth in this Agreement. None of the Health Department employees and/or agents shall become employees of System, and no employees of System shall be deemed or become employees of the Health Department by virtue of this Agreement. Section 2 - Term: This Agreement shall become effective on January 1, 1994, and shall remain in full force and effective until December 31, 1994, unless and until otherwise terminated sooner, pursuant to the provisions of Section 5 below. Page 1 of 4 931260 Greeley Washout AAnalysistfor of PollutantpDisccharge Monitor Well TDB S galt24ELY Section 3 - Services to be Provided b agrees to provide the following services to Systemalth De Health Department Agreement:Y during the term of this I22-,2211211 Contracted Nu mber of S les Contracted Fee Ammonia pH $ 6.00 each Chlorides $ 9.50 each Nitrate $ 1.25 each Oil & Grease V $ 7.40 each Fecal GreaseColiform isual) $ 6.40 each $ 1.25 each $22.30 each Effluent $25.00 Per Well Sampling Fee gu_4E5.1LtLy B0D TSS Oil & Grease (Visual) $12.70 each Ammonia $ 6.00 each pg $ 1.25 each Fecal Coliform $ 9.50 each $ 1.25 each Methods used by $22.30 each accordance Section elh Department in providing said services shall be Department with hthl () of the Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B. in Health Department and System o attimesand for further services as mutually agreed Health hereto. By signing this Agreement and providing the services hereinb, Health Department does not insure the accuracy ocof thesresultsation sofganyd teststo by erf rmed by Health Department and does not make any representations as to performed of of Systems compliance with federal or state lawto the and deanaly is requirements of Pollutant Discharge. governing the sa mpling analysis Section 4 - Release and Hold Harmless: harmless Health Department from any and liabilityalleand/or agrees damages and rhold esulting from the acts or omissions of Health Department in forth in this Agreement. resulting performing the services set Section 5 - Termination: Either party may terminate this Agreement upon 30 days written notice to the other party at the addresses set forth below. Page 2 of 4 921260 Greeley Washout Agreement for the Sampling and Analysis of Pollutant Discharge Section 6 - Obligations and Duties of System: System shall perform all of the obligations and duties set forth in Section II(c) of Weld County Ordinance 60-B. In addition, System shall pay for the services rendered by Health Department pursuant to this Agreement according to the contracted amount set forth in Section 3, above, and/or as may be mutually agreed to by the parties hereto. Payment shall be due within ten (10) days upon of receipt of the bill. Billing will be sent within ten (10) days of the quarter ending; i.e., March 31, June 30. September 30, and December 31, 1994. Section 7 - Waiver of Immunities/Duty of Care: No portion of this Agreement shall be deemed to constitute a waiver of any immunities the parties or their officers or employees may now possess, nor shall any portion of this Agreement be deemed to or created a duty of care with the respect to any persons not a party to this Agreement. Section 8 - Severability: If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of the Agreement is for any reason held or decided to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions hereof. The parties hereto declare that they would have entered into this Agreement and each and every section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, and phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsection, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, or phrases may be declared to be unconstitutional or invalid. Section 9 - Notices: All notices to the parties shall be sent to the following: Entity: Greeley Washout/Ed Duggan Inc. Contact Person: Ed Duggan Address: P. O. Box448.0.53i° .3i° City, State, Zip: Windsor, CO 80550 Phone: (303) 686-7403 Entity: Weld County Health Department Contact Person: Judy Schmidt Address: 1517 16th Avenue Court City, State, Zip: Greeley, CO 80631 Phone: (303)353-0635 extension 2249 Page 3 of 4 9271260 ) Greeley Washout Agreement for the Sampling and Analysis of Pollutant Discharge Signed this dd�ay of BY: TITLE OF AUTHORITY: ,Ww0,70 ea -O Page 4 of 4 3.973 COUNTY OF WELD. STATE OF COLORADO BY AND THROUGH THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY ON BEHALF OF THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT BY: f,.11 d1�aticcd- /02/3/93 ATTEST: Weld Coun y Clerk to the BY: Chairman eputy Clerk o the Board Approved by: WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT 1 )i6 S. Pickle, M.S.E.H. rector Weld County Health Department 931260 r_ r it n^nom I ' i� NOV 3019931 POLLUTANT DISCHARGE AGREEMENT FOR THE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS OF POLLUTANT DISCHARGE BY THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT e2HIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 3O day of N0up,y.be,.-, 19 ( 5, by between the CITY OF FORT LUPTON , whose address is l So i c , hereinafter referred to as "System," and the County of Weld,'State of Colorado, by and through the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, on behalf of the Weld County Health Department, whose office is located at 1517 16th Avenue Court, Greeley, Colorado 80631, hereinafter referred to as "Health Department." WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B authorizes the Weld County Health Department to perform by agreement the testing of drinking water for suppliers thereof and the testing of pollutant discharges for those persons and entities holding permits to discharge pollutants into state waters, and WHEREAS, Health Department possesses the necessary equipment and expertise required to perform the sampling and analysis of the water for System as required by federal law, and WHEREAS, the services provided by Health Department pursuant to this Agreement shall benefit the health, safety, and welfare of those persons residing within the area served by System. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: Section 1 - Authorization to Act: The System hereby authorizes the Health Department to perform the services listed in this Agreement and in Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B, for the testing of water on behalf of System. The provisions of Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B are incorporated herein in their entirety. Health Department shall act as an independent contractor in relation to the System in the performance of the services set forth in this Agreement. None of the Health Department employees and/or agents shall become employees of System, and no employees of System shall be deemed or become employees of the Health Department by virtue of this Agreement. Section 2 - Term: This Agreement shall become effective on January 1, 1994, and shall remain in full force and effective until December 31, 1994, unless and until otherwise terminated sooner, pursuant to the provisions of Section 5 below. Page 1 of 3 931260 City of Fort Lupton Agreement for the Sampling and POLLUTANT DISCHARGE Analysis of Pollutant Discharge Section 3 - Services to be Provided by Health Department: Health Department agrees to provide the following services to System during the term of this Agreement: Type of Test Contracted Number of Samples Contracted Fee Influent - SOD Weekly/as reggaes/4' TSS Weekly " 8 $ 12.70 each Effluent - BOD Weekly i/ 6.00 each TSS Weekly /, 12.70 each Fecal Coliform Weekly / 6.00 each Ammonia Monthly 22.30 each Total Hardness As requested 9.50 each Nitrate As requested 5.20 each 6.40 each Methods used by Health Department in providing said services shall be in accordance with Section 1(b) of the Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B. Health Department shall provide further services as mutually agreed upon by Health Department and System at times and for compensation as agreed to by the parties hereto. By signing this Agreement and providing the services herein, Health Department does not insure the accuracy of the results of any tests performed by Health Department and does not make any representations as to the adequacy of Systems compliance with federal or state law governing the sampling and analysis requirements of Pollutant Discharge. Section 4 - Release and Hold Harmless: The System agrees to release and hold harmless Health Department from any and all liability and/or damages resulting from the acts or omissions of Health Department in performing the services set forth in this Agreement. Section 5 - Termination: Either party may terminate this Agreement upon 30 days written notice to the other party at the addresses set forth below. Section 6 - Obligations and Duties of System: System shall perform all of the obligations and duties set forth in Section I1(c) of Weld County Ordinance 60-B. In addition, System shall pay for the services rendered by Health Department pursuant to this Agreement according to the contracted amount set forth in Section 3, above, and/or as may be mutually agreed to by the parties hereto. Payment shall be due within ten (10) days upon of receipt of the bill. Billing will be sent within ten (10) days of the month ending. Section 7 - Waiver of Immunities/Duty of Care: No portion of this Agreement shall be deemed to constitute a waiver of any immunities the parties or their officers or employees may now possess, nor shall any portion of this Agreement be deemed to or created a duty of care with the respect to any persons not a party to this Agreement. Page 2 of 3 931260 City of Fort Lupton Agreement for the Sampling and Analysis of Pollutant Discharge POLLUTANT DISCHARGE Section 8 - Severability: If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of the Agreement is for any reason held or decided to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions hereof. The parties hereto declare that they would have entered into this Agreement and each and every section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, and phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsection, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, or phrases may be declared to be unconstitutional or invalid. Section 9 - Notices: All notices to the parties shall be sent to the following: Entity: City of Fort Lupton Contact Person: Bob Alberts Address: P. 0. Box 148 City, State, Zip:Ft. Lupton, CO 80621 Phone: (303) 857-9442 Entity: Weld County Health Department Contact Person: Judy Schmidt Address: 1517 16th Avenue Court City, State, Zip: Greeley, CO 80631 Phone: (303)353-0635 extension 2249 Signed this 30 day of N O Ue tn ije.— BY: C 4?' e I- Foe& �pcdti ^SYSTEM^ TITLE OF AUTHORITY: yP��Q aeQn.i- C JM e F ci(c , 1973. COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO BY AND THROUGH THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY ON BEHALF OF THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT BY: Cu Chairman 43/9.3 ATTEST: Weld Coun y Clerk to the BY: eputy Cler t• the Board Approved by: WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT Jyr S. Pickle, M.S.E.H. rector Weld County Health Department Page 3 of 3 • 921260 POLLUTANT DISCHARGE AGREEMENT FOR THE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS OF POLLUTANT DISCHARGE BY THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this /9 day of A4ce ee-'4 19.9:3_, by and between the CITY OF LONGMONT - UNION RESERVOIR , whose address is pyGi ti "Adaph c.... > CC? .2G , hereinafter referred to as "System," and the County of Weld, State of Colorado, by and through the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, on behalf of the Weld County Health Department, whose office is located at 1517 16th Avenue Court, Greeley, Colorado 80631, hereinafter referred to as "Health Department." WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B authorizes the Weld County Health Department to perform by agreement the testing of drinking water for suppliers thereof and the testing of pollutant discharges for those persons and entities holding permits to discharge pollutants into state waters, and WHEREAS, Health Department possesses the necessary equipment and expertise required to perform the sampling and analysis of the water for System as required by federal law, and WHEREAS, the services provided by Health Department pursuant to this Agreement shall benefit the health, safety, and welfare of those persons residing within the area served by System. NOV, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: Section 1 - Authorization to Act: The System hereby authorizes the Health Department to perform the services listed in this Agreement and in Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B, for the testing of water on behalf of System. The provisions of Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B are incorporated herein in their entirety. Health Department shall act as an independent contractor in relation to the System in the performance of the services set forth in this Agreement. None of the Health Department employees and/or agents shall become employees of System, and no employees of System shall be deemed or become employees of the Health Department by virtue of this Agreement. Section 2 - Term: This Agreement shall become effective on January 1, 1994, and shall remain in full force and effective until December 31, 1994, unless and until otherwise terminated sooner, pursuant to the provisions of Section 5 below. Page 1 of 3 9217.60 1 City of Longmont - Union Reservoir Agreement for the Sampling and Analysis of Pollutant Discharge Section 3 - Services to be Provided by Health Department: Health Department agrees to provide the following services to System during the term of this Agreement: Type of Test Bacteriological (Fecal Coliform) September) Methods used by Health Department in providing said services shall be in accordance with Section I(b) of the Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B. Health Department shall provide further services as mutually agreed upon by Health Department and System at times and for compensation as agreed to by the parties hereto. By signing this Agreement and providing the services herein, Health Department does not insure the accuracy of the results of any tests performed by Health Department and does not make any representations as to the adequacy of Systems compliance with federal or state law governing the sampling and analysis requirements of Pollutant Discharge. Section 4 - Release and Hold Harmless: The System agrees to release and hold harmless Health Department from any and all liability and/or damages resulting from the acts or omissions of Health Department in performing the services set forth in this Agreement. Contracted Number of Samples Contracted Fee One per month (May through $22.30 each Section 5 - Termination: Either party may terminate this Agreement upon 30 days written notice to the other party at the addresses set forth below. Section 6 - Obligations and Duties of System: System shall perform all of the obligations and duties set forth in Section II(c) of Weld County Ordinance 60-B. In addition, System shall pay for the services rendered by Health Department pursuant to this Agreement according to the contracted amount set forth in Section 3, above, and/or as may be mutually agreed to by the parties hereto. Payment shall be due within ten (10) days upon of receipt of the bill. Billing will be sent within ten (10) days of the quarter ending; i.e.. March 31, June 30, September 30, and December 31, 1994. Section 7 - Waiver of Immunities/Duty of Care: No portion of this Agreement shall be deemed to constitute a waiver of any immunities the parties or their officers or employees may now possess, nor shall any portion of this Agreement be deemed to or created a duty of care with the respect to any persons not a party to this Agreement. Page 2 of 3 931260 City of Longmont - Union Reservoir Agreement for the Sampling and Analysis of Pollutant Discharge Section 8 - Severability: If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence. clause, or phrase of the Agreement is for any reason held or decided to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions hereof. The parties hereto declare that they would have entered into this Agreement and each and every section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, and phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsection, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, or phrases may be declared to be unconstitutional or invalid. Section 9 - Notices: All notices to the parties shall be sent to the following: Entity: City of Longmont Parks Divs. Contact Person: Gene Kraning Address: 747 Coffman Street City, State, Zip: Longmont, CO 80501 Phone: (303) 651-8446 Entity: Weld County Health Department Contact Person: Judy Schmidt Address: 1517 16th Avenue Court City, State, Zip: GreeleyL CO 80631 Phone: (303)353-0635 extension 2249 Signed this .19 day of /Y05.--r-M/fOPt , 19.51.2. BY: C ily A7,Zo-.✓l./n r:70' COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO BY / "SYSTEM" AND THROUGH THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY ON BEHALF OF THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPAR TITLE OF AUTHORITY: 7 BY: Chairman ATTES BY: ft.rcot/ i./13Ig3 : Wetd County Clerk to the eputy Cler tT the Board Approved by: WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT . Pickle, M.S.E.H. irector Weld County Health Department Page 3 of 3 9:.:71.? POLLUTANT DISCHARGE AGREEMENT FOR THE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS OF POLLUTANT DISCHARGE BY THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this / % day of Vo o 19j, by and between the BUCKLEN EQUIPMENT COMP INC. , whose address is hereinafter and the County of Weld, State of Colorado by and y through the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, on behalf of the Weld County Health Department, whose office is located at 1517 16th Avenue Court, Greeley, Colorado 80631, hereinafter referred to as "Health Department." WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B authorizes the Weld County Health Department to perform by agreement the testing of drinking water for suppliers thereof and the testing of pollutant discharges for those persons and entities holding permits to discharge pollutants into state waters, and WHEREAS, Health Department possesses the necessary equipment and expertise required to perform the sampling and analysis of the water for System as required by federal law, and WHEREAS, the services provided by Health Department pursuant to this Agreement shall benefit the health, safety, and welfare of those persons residing within the area served by System. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: Section 1 - Authorization to Act: The System hereby authorizes the Health Department to perform the services listed in this Agreement and in Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B, for the testing of water on behalf of System. The provisions of Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B are incorporated herein in their entirety. Health Department shall act as an independent contractor in relation to the System in the performance of the services set forth in this Agreement. None of the Health Department employees and/or agents shall become employees of System, and no employees of System shall be deemed or become employees of the Health Department by virtue of this Agreement. Section 2 - Term: This Agreement shall become effective on January 1, 1994, and shall remain in full force and effective until December 31, 1994, unless and until otherwise terminated sooner, pursuant to the provisions of Section 5 below. Page 1 of 3 9212.60 Bucklen Equipment Company Inc. Agreement for the Sampling and Analysis of Pollutant Discharge Section 3 - Services to be Provided by Health Department: Health Department agrees to provide the following services to System during the term of this Agreement: Type of Test Contracted Number of Samples Contracted Pee Effluent As requested pH Suspended Solids Oil & Grease (Visual) Sampling Fee $ 1.25 each $ 6.00 each $ 1.25 each $35.00/hr Methods used by Health Department in providing said services shall be in accordance with Section 1(b) of the Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B. Health Department shall provide further services as mutually agreed upon by Health Department and System at times and for compensation as agreed to by the parties hereto. By signing this Agreement and providing the services herein, Health Department does not insure the accuracy of the results of any tests performed by Health Department and does not make any representations as to the adequacy of Systems compliance with federal or state law governing the sampling and analysis requirements of Pollutant Discharge. Section 4 - Release and Hold Harmless: The System agrees to release and hold harmless Health Department from any and all liability and/or damages resulting from the acts or omissions of Health Department in performing the services set forth in this Agreement. Section 5 - Termination: Either party may terminate this Agreement upon 30 days written notice to the other party at the addresses set forth below. Section 6 - Obljgations and Duties of System: System shall perform all of the obligations and duties set forth in Section 11(c) of Weld County Ordinance 60-B. In addition, System shall pay for the services rendered by Health Department pursuant to this Agreement according to the contracted amount set forth in Section 3, above, and/or as may be mutually agreed to by the parties hereto. Payment shall be due within ten (10) days upon of receipt of the bill. Billing will be sent within ten (10) days of the quarter ending; i.e., March 31, June 30, September 30, and December 31, 1994. Section 7 - Waiver of Immunities/Duty of Care: No portion of this Agreement shall be deemed to constitute a waiver of any immunities the parties or their officers or employees may now possess, nor shall any portion of this Agreement be deemed to or created a duty of care with the respect to any persons not a party to this Agreement. Page 2 of 3 931260 Bucklen ent annc. uiAgreementqformthe Samplingland Analysis of Pollutant Discharge Section 8 - Severability: If any section, subsection. paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of the Agreement is for any reason held or decided to to invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions hereof. The parties hereto declare that they would have entered into this Agreement and each and every section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, and phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsection, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, or phrases may be declared to be unconstitutional or invalid. Section 9 - Notices: All notices to the parties shall be sent to the following: Entity: Bucklen Equipment Company Inc. Contact Person: Susan Bucklen Address: 804 North 25th Avenue City, State, Zip: Greeley, CO 80631 Phone: (303) 353-0720 Signed this a` day of /(/oo, BY: e1� "SYSTEM" TITLE OF AUTHORITY: ae k&e Entity: Weld County Health Department Contact Person: Judy Schmidt Address: 1517 16th Avenue Court City, State, Zip: Greele CO 80631 Phone: (303)353-0635 extension 2249 , 19el3 . COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO BY AND THROUGH THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY ON BEHALF OF THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMEN- BY: .i'sdL`ertte� Chairman _, la/ S. ATTESA: Weld�C'unty Clerk to the i BY: • eputy Clerk t Approved by: WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT hn 5. Pickle, M.S.E.H. Director Weld County Health Department Page 3 of 3 sf1Z6O r Nov 3 01993' POLLUTANT DISCHARGE AGREEMENT FOR THE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS OF POLLUTANT DISCHARGE BY THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of !v w e,4 to 19g- by and between ALBERTS WATER/WASTEWATER , whose address is 121 3rd Street, Fort Collins, Colorado, hereinafter referred to as "System," and the County of Weld, State of Colorado, by and through the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, on behalf of the Weld County Health Department, whose office is located at 1517 16th Avenue Court, Greeley, Colorado 80631, hereinafter referred to as "Health Department." WITNESSETH: WHEREAS. Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B authorizes the Weld County Health Department to perform by agreement the testing of drinking water for suppliers thereof and the testing of pollutant discharges for those persons and entities holding permits to discharge pollutants into state waters, and WHEREAS, Health Department possesses the necessary equipment and expertise required to perform the sampling and analysis of the water for System as required by federal law, and WHEREAS, the services provided by Health Department pursuant to this Agreement shall benefit the health, safety,and welfare of those persons residing within the area served by System. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: Section 1 - Authorization to Act: The System hereby authorizes the Health Department to perform the services listed in this Agreement and in Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B, for the testing of water on behalf of System. The provisions of Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B are incorporated herein in their entirety. Health Department shall act as an independent contractor in relation to the System in the performance of the services set forth in this Agreement. None of the Health Department employees and/or agents shall become employees of System, and no employees of System shall be deemed or become employees of the Health Department by virtue of this Agreement. Section 2 - Term: This Agreement shall become effective on January 1, 1994, and shall remain in full force and effective until December 31, 1994, unless and until otherwise terminated sooner, pursuant to the provisions of Section 5 below. Page 1 of 3 931260 Alberts Water/Wastewater Agreement for the Sampling and Analysis of Pollutant Discharge Section 3 - Services to be Provided by Health Department: Health Department agrees to provide the following services to System during the term of this Agreement: Type of Test Influent - SOD TSS Effluent - BOD TSS Fecal Coliforms Ammonia Contracted Number of Samples Contracted Fee As requested As requested As requested $12.70 each $ 6.00 each $12.70 each $ 6.00 each $22.30 each As requested $ 9.50 each Methods used by Health Department in providing said services shall be in accordance with Section I(b) of the Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B. Health Department shall provide further services as mutually agreed upon by Health Department and System at times and for compensation as agreed to by the parties hereto. By signing this Agreement and providing the services herein, Health Department does not insure the accuracy of the results of any tests performed by Health Department and does not make any representations as to the adequacy of Systems compliance with federal or state law governing the sampling and analysis requirements of Pollutant Discharge. Section 4 - Release and Hold Harmless: The System agrees to release and hold harmless Health Department from any and all liability and/or damages resulting from the acts or omissions of Health Department in performing the services set forth in this Agreement. Section 5 - Termination: Either party may terminate this Agreement upon 30 days written notice to the other party at the addresses set forth below. Section 6 - Obligations and Duties of System: System shall perform all of the obligations and duties set forth in Section II(c) of Weld County Ordinance 60-B. In addition, System shall pay for the services rendered by Health Department pursuant to this Agreement according to the contracted amount set forth in Section 3, above, and/or as may be mutually agreed to by the parties hereto. Payment shall be due within ten (10) days upon of receipt of the bill. Billing will be sent within ten (10) days of the month ending. Section 7 - Waiver of Immunities/Duty of Care: No portion of this Agreement shall be deemed to constitute a waiver of any immunities the parties or their officers or employees may now possess, nor shall any portion of this Agreement be deemed to or created a duty of care with the respect to any persons not a party to this Agreement. Page 2 of 3 921269 Alberts Water/Wastewater Agreement for the Sampling and Analysis of Pollutant Discharge Section 8 - Severability: If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of the Agreement is for any reason held or decided to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions hereof. The parties hereto declare that they would have entered into this Agreement and each and every section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, and phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsection, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, or phrases may be declared to be unconstitutional or invalid. Section 9 - Notices: All notices to the parties shall be sent to the following: Entity: Alberts Water & Wastewater Contact Person: Bob Alberts Address: 121 3rd Street City, State, Zip:Ft. Collins, CO 80524 Phone: (303) 224-1763 Signed this :3J day of BY: Entity: We:.d County Health Department Contact Person: Judy Schmidt Address: 1517 16th Avenue Court City, State, Zip: Greeley, CO 80631 Phone: (303) 353-0635 extension 2249 PLCiar5 JU, v/µ1 }� ..SMLCOUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO BY "SY TEM" AND THROUGH THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY ON BEHALF OF THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMEN TITLE OF AUTHORITY: frotr, BY: Chairman ATTE BY: T: Weld %,/may /.3h3/93 ounty Clerk to the eputy Clerk to Approved by: WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT o S. Pickle, M.S.E.H. D ector Weld County Health Department Page 3 of 3 931260 let Wilk COLORADO MEMOR:AnDU To From sublOct: Constance L. Harbert, Chairman Board of County Commissioners DO. rry) -r • n ry .n, 23 December 13, 1993 John S. Pickle, M.S.E.H., Director, W.C.H Sampling and Analysis of Drinking Water Agreement l,g Enclosed for Board approval are Purchase of Services Agreements between the Weld County Health Department and the following: Aristocrat Ranchettes Briggsdale Water Company Brighton, City of Burrito Delight Central Weld County Water District Eaton, Town of Fort Lupton., City of Frederick, Town of John's Meats Larimer County Mile Hi Livestock Auction Mile Hi Shooting Park, Inc. Millard Refrigeration Services Monfort Portion Foods North Weld County Water District Rockport Cafe Sylmar Manor Stuckey's USDA Forest Service Wattenburg Improvement Association Weld County School District Re -10J Windsor, Town of for the sampling and analysis of drinking water. All contracted fees are in accordance with the fees established in County Ordiance #82-M. The term of the agreement shall be from January 1, 1994, through December 31, 1994. I would recommend approval of these contracts. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. JSP/lam-2420 931259, a Jr. I _ rit rj,, )\37 r.%, vf5 \"/ f DRINKING WATER way. 21'19931 \itLD lit). rice',. �Ie , AGREEMENT FOR THE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS OF DRINKING WATER BY THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this ,-,., day of 72ttt 1993 , by and between ARISTOCRAT RANCHETTES , whose address is ,Qp,/ &j 7.V CO gp&a/_, hereinafter referred to as "System," and the County of Weld, State of Colorado, by and through the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, on behalf of the Weld County Health Department, whose office is located at 1517 16th Avenue Court, Greeley, Colorado 80631, hereinafter referred to as "Health Department.". WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B authorizes the Weld County Health Department to perform by agreement the testing of drinking water for suppliers thereof and the testing of pollutant discharges for those persons and entities holding permits to discharge pollutants into state waters, and WHEREAS, system supplies . 3O ' persons with drinking water, and WHEREAS, Health Department possesses the necessary equipment and expertise required to perform the sampling and analysis of the drinking water for System as required by federal law, and WHEREAS, the services provided by Health Department pursuant to this Agreement shall benefit the health, safety, and welfare of those persons residing within the area served by System. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: Section 1 - Authorization to Act: The System hereby authorizes Health Department to perform the services listed in this Agreement and in Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B, for the testing of Drinking Water on behalf of System. The provisions of Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B are incorporated herein in their entirety. Health Department shall act as an independent contractor in relation to the System in the performance of services set forth in this Agreement. None of the Health Department employees and/or agents shall become employees of System, and no employees of System shall be deemed or become employees of the Health Department by virtue of this Agreement. Section 2 - Term: This Agreement shall become effective on January 1. 1994, and shall remain in full force and effective until December 31, 1994, unless and until otherwise terminated sooner, pursuant to the provisions of Section 5 below. 921259 As Required Aristocrat Ranchettes Agreement for the Sampling and Analysis of Drinking Water De ment: Health ment Section 3 - the Services ofollowing servicestoSystem be Provided b Health htduring the term oftthis agrees to provide Agreement: Contracted Fee Tyne of Test Contracted Number of S les $17.00 each Bacteriological Routine (Total Coliform) (two per month minimum) $22.50 each Resample As Required $15.00 each Confirmation Note: If multiple resamples are taken on the same $6.50. Methods same location - the first sample is $22.50, each additional sample is Methods used by Health Department in providing said services shall be in accordance with Section 1(b) of the Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B. ealth Department shall provide further services as mutually agreed upon by Health Health Department and system at times Agreement andoprovidingnas the sereed vices so by the herein, Health hereto. By signing tests performed by Department does not insure the accuracy of the results of any of HealthSystems compliance with federal or state lawe any resentations as to governing the sampling the adequacy ning water. Section 4 - Release and Hold Harmless: The System agrees to release and hold harmless Health Department from any and all liability and/or damages resulting from the acts or omissions of Health Department in performing the services set forth in this Agreement. Section 5 - Termination: Either party may terminate this Agreement upon 30 days written notice to the other party at the addresses set forth below. the obligations and duties set forthfin Section ) of Weld County ordinance f0 rendered by Health Department In addition, System shall pay or the services parties hereto. pursuant to this Agreement according to the contracted amount set forth in Section met 3, above, and/or as may nbe mutually days upn of receiptgreed to ythe of the bill. Billing will be shall t due within ten (10) will be sent within ten (10) days of the quarter ending: i.e., March 31, June 30, September 30, and December 31, 1994. : No on f is shall be7deemedvto constitute a waiveroof any immunitiesitheopartiesAoreement their officers or employees may now ossess, nor shall any portion of this Agreement t be deemed to or created a dutyof care with the respect to any persons party to this Agreement. s 21259 .. . Aristocrat Ranchettes Agreement for the Sampling and Analysis of Drinking Water Section 8 - Severability: If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of the Agreement is for any reason held or decided to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions hereof. The parties hereto declare that they would have entered into this Agreement and each and every section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, and phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, or phrases may be declared to be unconstitutional or invalid. Section 9 - Notices: All notices to the parties shall be sent to the following: Entity: ARWP, Inc. Entity: Weld County Health Department Contact Person: MARY 6)Wo£ontact Person: Judy Schmidt Address: P. 0. Box 247 Address: 1517 16th Avenue Court City, State, Zip:Ft. Lupton, CO 80621 City, State, Zip: Greeley, CO 80631 Phone: (303) 857 6813 Ss 7-,r2Io Phone: (303)353-0635 extension 2249 Signednn__ this (i. day ofyy-1/{,Qrl. , 19 93. BY: &tZ♦♦,C≥/�t esa� Z O&1 t/r COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO BY "SYSTEM" AND THROUGH THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY ON BEHALF OF THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH TITLE OF AUTHORITY: DEPAR )21 .346d-ra- i' V3/0 86-N-CaeL /44w/cue-de U t.oLOV t;), dce2 a Sze, /, /99.x, BY: rbelki Chairman /a ATTE BY: T: puty Clerk o he Board Weld ount Clerk to ar �/ f !Mier Approved by: WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT S. Pickle, M.S.E.H. rector Weld County Health Department the 4).1253 DRINKING WATER II ' AGREEMENT FOR THE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS OF DRINKING WATER BY THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this ant day of S UPvr_Der 19 , by and between BRIGGSDALE WATER COMPANY , whose address is 3o ; In, Hot` , hereinafter referred to as "System," and the County of Weld, State of Colorado. by and through the Board of County Commissioners of weld County, on behalf of the Weld County Health Department, whose office is located at 1517 16th Avenue Court, Greeley, Colorado 80631, hereinafter referred to as "Health Department." WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Weld County Ordinance No. 60-8 authorizes the Weld County Health Department to perform by agreement the testing of drinking water for suppliers thereof and the testing of pollutant discharges for those persons and entities holding permits to discharge pollutants into state waters, and WHEREAS, system supplies q 0 persons with drinking water, and WHEREAS, Health Department possesses the necessary equipment and expertise required to perform the sampling and analysis of the drinking water for System as required by federal law, and WHEREAS, the services provided by Health Department pursuant to this Agreement shall benefit the health, safety, and welfare of those persons residing within the area served by System. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: Section 1 - Authorization to Act: The System hereby authorizes Health Department to perform the services listed in this Agreement and in Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B, for the testing of Drinking Water on behalf of System. The provisions of Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B are incorporated herein in their entirety. Health Department shall act as an independent contractor in relation to the System in the performance of services set forth in this Agreement. None of the Health Department employees and/or agents shall become employees of System, and no employees of System shall be deemed or become employees of the Health Department by virtue of this Agreement. Section 2 - Term: This Agreement shall become effective on January 1, 1994, and shall remain in full force and effective until December 31, 1994, unless and until otherwise terminated sooner, pursuant to the provisions of Section 5 below. Page 2 of 3 931259 Briggsdale Water Company Agreement for the Sampling and Analysis of Drinking Water Section 3 - Services to be Provided by Health Department: Health Department agrees to provide the following services to System during the term of this Agreement: Type of Test Bacteriological (Total Coli£orm) Resample Confirmation Contracted Number of Samples Contracted Fee Routine Sample $17.00 each As Required $22.50 each As Required $15.00 each Note: If multiple rsamples are taken on the same day, same location - the first sample is $22.50, each additional sample is $6.50. Methods used by Health Department in providing said services shall be in accordance with Section I(b) of the Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B. Health Department shall provide further services as mutually agreed upon by Health Department and System at times and for compensation as agreed to by the parties hereto. By signing this Agreement and providing the services herein, Health Department does not insure the accuracy of the results of any tests performed by Health Department and does not make any representations as to the adequacy of Systems compliance with federal or state law governing the sampling of drinking water. Section 4 - Release and Hold Harmless: The System agrees to release and hold harmless Health Department from any and all liability and/or damages resulting from the acts or omissions of Health Department in performing the services set forth in this Agreement. Section 5 - Termination: Either party may terminate this Agreement upon 30 days written notice to the other party at the addresses set forth below. Section 6 - obligations and Duties of System: System shall perform all of the obligations and duties set forth in Section II(c) of Weld County Ordinance 60-B. In addition, System shall pay for the services rendered by Health Department pursuant to this Agreement according to the contracted amount set forth in Section 3, above, and/or as may be mutually agreed to by the parties hereto. Payment shall be due within ten (10) days upon of receipt of the bill. Billing will be sent within ten (10) days of the quarter ending: i.e., March 31, June 30, September 30, and December 31, 1994. Section 7 - Waiver of Immunities/Duty of Care: No portion of this Agreement shall be deemed to constitute a waiver of any immunities the parties or their officers or employees may now possess, nor shall any portion of this Agreement be deemed to or created a duty of care with the respect to any persons not a party to this Agreement. Page 2 of 3 931259 Briggsdale Water Company Agreement for the Sampling and Analysis of Drinking Water Section 8 - Severability: If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of the Agreement is for any reason held or decided to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions hereof. The parties hereto declare that they would have entered into this Agreement and each and every section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, and phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, or phrases may be declared to be unconstitutional or invalid. Section 9 - Notices: All notices to the parties shall be sent to the following: Entity: Briggsdale Water Company Contact Person: Lucille Armagost Address: P. O. Box 82 City, State, Zip: Briggsdale, CO 80611 Phone: 1303) 656-3689 Entity: Weld County Health Department Contact Person: Judy Schmidt Address: 1517 16th Avenue Court City, State, Zip: Greeley, CO 80631 Phone: (303)353-0635 extension 2249 Signed this e0 day of ke)(1Qn41 e'r , 19 93 . BY:BQ/ggc40JP. 1/Jaty eO. COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO BY JJ "SYSTEM" AND THROUGH THE BOARD OF COUNTY TITLE OF AUTHORITY: COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY ON BEHALF OF THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT BY: Chairman 12//3/93 ATTEWeld f,.ounty Clerk to the BY: Deputy Clerk £o'the Board r Approved by: WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT b: Pickle, M.S.E.H. irector Weld County Health Department Page 3 of 3 931259 I) '-1t-:r,r int--,..-,„ ,,1jyi1 DEC 0 61993 it DRINKING WATER AGREEMENT FOR THE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS OF DRINKING WATER BY THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this n day of PeCtefi 19", Z , by and between CITY OF BRIGHTON , whose address is dd- 50c1$? Fainfti .9-9L , hereinafter referred to as "System," and the County of Weld, State of Colorado, by and through the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, on behalf of the Weld County Health Department, whose office is located at 1517 16th Avenue Court, Greeley, Colorado 80631, hereinafter referred to as "Health Department." WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B authorizes the Weld County Health Department to perform by agreement the testing of drinking water for suppliers thereof and the testing of pollutant discharges for those persons and entities holding permits to discharge pollutants into state waters, and WHEREAS, system supplies 14,000 persons with drinking water, and WHEREAS, Health Department possesses the necessary equipment and expertise required to perform the sampling and analysis of the drinking water for System as required by federal law, and WHEREAS, the services provided by Health Department pursuant to this Agreement shall benefit the health, safety, and welfare of those persons residing within the area served by System. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: Section 1 - Authorization to Act: The System hereby authorizes Health Department to perform the services listed in this Agreement and in Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B, for the testing of Drinking Water on behalf of System. The provisions of Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B are incorporated herein in their entirety. Health Department shall act as an independent contractor in relation to the System in the performance of services set forth in this Agreement. None of the Health Department employees and/or agents shall become employees of System, and no employees of System shall be deemed or become employees of the Health Department by virtue of this Agreement. Section 2 - Term: This Agreement shall become effective on January 1, 1994, and shall remain in full force and effective until December 31, 1994, unless and until otherwise terminated sooner, pursuant to the provisions of Section 5 below. Page 1 of 3 931.259 r City of Brighton Agreement for the Sampling and Analysis of Drinking Water Section 3 - Services to be Provided by Health Department: Health Department agrees to provide the following services to System during the term of this Agreement: Type of Test Nitrate Contracted Number of Samples As Submitted Contracted Fee $6.40 each Methods used by Health Department in providing said services shall be in accordance with Section I(b) of the Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B. Health Department shall provide further services as mutually agreed upon by Health Department and System at times and for compensation as agreed to by the parties hereto. By signing this Agreement and providing the services herein, Health Department does not insure the accuracy of the results of any tests performed by Health Department and does not make any representations as to the adequacy of Systems compliance with federal or state law governing the sampling of drinking water. Section 4 - Release and Hold Harmless: The System agrees to release and hold harmless Health Department from any and all liability and/or damages resulting from the acts or omissions of Health Department in performing the services set forth in this Agreement. Section 5 - Termination: Either party may terminate this Agreement upon 30 days written notice to the other party at the addresses set forth below. Section 6 - Obligations and Duties of System: System shall perform all of the obligations and duties set forth in Section II(c) of Weld County Ordinance 60-B. In addition, System shall pay for the services rendered by Health Department pursuant to this Agreement according to the contracted amount set forth in Section 3, above, and/or as may be mutually agreed to by the parties hereto. Payment shall be due within ten (10) days upon of receipt of the bill. Billing will be sent within ten (10) days of the quarter ending: i.e., March 31, June 30, September 30, and December 31, 1994. Section 7 - Waiver of Immunities/Duty of Care: No portion of this Agreement shall be deemed to constitute a waiver of any immunities the parties or their officers or employees may now possess, nor shall any portion of this Agreement be deemed to or created a duty of care with the respect to any persons not a party to this Agreement. Section 8 - Severability: If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of the Agreement is for any reason held or decided to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions hereof. The parties hereto declare that they would have Page 2 of 3 931259 r City of Brighton Agreement for the Sampling and Analysis of Drinking Water entered into this Agreement and each ants every section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, and phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, or phrases may be declared to be unconstitutional or invalid. Section 9 - Notices: All notices to the parties shall be sent to the following: Entity: City of Brighton Contact Person: Ed Burke Address: 22 S. 4th Avenue City, State, Zip: Brighton, CO Phone: (303) 659-4050 Signed this /S7 day of BY: C/7 of /9R/G4frofl -SYSTEM" TITLE OF AUTHORITY: Entity: Weld County Health Department Contact Person: Judy Schmidt Address: 1517 16th Avenue Court 80601 City, State, Zip: Greeley, CO 80631 Phone: (303)353-0635 extension 2249 .v/RGC4'2 o�c br/L/%/6i , 19 9i COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO BY AND THROUGH THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY ON BEHALF OF THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT BY: / z z4 Ai;;; 14� 1r Chairman - 'al's/93 A1 7 ST: Weil Courfty Clerk to the ru BY: Approved by: WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT eputy Clerk to the Board_.-' . Pickle, M.S.E.H. rector Weld County Health Department Page 3 of 3 931259 la* 3_0 199.3 DRINKING WATER AGREEMENT FOR THE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS OF DRINKING WATER BY THE WELD COUNT'! HEALTH DEPARTMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this ,3(j day of `yJ./rz.•. , 1993, by and between BURRITO DELIGHT , whose address is , hereinafter referred to as "System," and the County of Weld, State of Colorado, by and through the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, on behalf of the Weld County Health Department, whose office is located at 1517 16th Avenue Court, Greeley, Colorado 80631, hereinafter referred to as "Health Department." WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B authorizes the Weld County Health Department to perform by agreement the testing of drinking water for suppliers thereof and the testing of pollutant discharges for those persons and entities holding permits to discharge pollutants into state waters, and WHEREAS, system supplies O persons with drinking water, and WHEREAS, Health Department possesses the necessary equipment and expertise required to perform the sampling and analysis of the drinking water for System as required by federal law, and WHEREAS, the services provided by Health Department pursuant to this Agreement shall benefit the health, safety, and welfare of those persons residing within the area served by System. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: Section 1 - Authorization to Act: The System hereby authorizes Health Department to perform the services listed in this Agreement and in Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B, for the testing of Drinking Water on behalf of System. The provisions of Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B are incorporated herein in their entirety. Health Department shall act as an independent contractor in relation to the System in the performance of services set forth in this Agreement. None of the Health Department employees and/or agents shall become employees of System, and no employees of System shall be deemed or become employees of the Health Department by virtue of this Agreement. Section 2 - Term: This Agreement shall become effective on January 1, 1994, and shall remain in full force and effective until December 31, 1994, unless and until otherwise terminated sooner, pursuant to the provisions of Section 5 below. Page 1 of 3 92,1259 Burrito Delight Agreement for the Sampling and Analysis of Drinking Water Section 3 - Services to be Provided by Health Department: Health Department agrees to provide the following services to System during the term of this Agreement: Type of Test Bacteriological (Total Coliform) Resample Confirmation Contracted Number of Samples Contracted Fee Routine Sample $21.00 each (One per quarter) As Required $22.50 each As Required $15.00 each Note: If multiple resamples are taken on the same day, same location - the first samples is $22.50, each additional sample is $6.50. Methods used by Health Department in providing said services shall be in accordance with Section I(b) of the Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B. Health Department shall provide further services as mutually agreed upon by Health Department and System at times and for compensation as agreed to by the parties hereto. By signing this Agreement and providing the services herein, Health Department does not insure the accuracy of the results of any tests performed by Health Department and does not make any representations as to the adequacy of Systems compliance with federal or state law governing the sampling of drinking water. Section 4 - Release and Hold Harmless: The System agrees to release and hold harmless Health Department from any and all liability and/or damages resulting from the acts or omissions of Health Department in performing the services set forth in this Agreement. Section 5 - Termination: Either party may terminate this Agreement upon 30 days written notice to the other party at the addresses set forth below. Section 6 - Obligations and Duties of System: System shall perform all of the obligations and duties set forth in Section II(c) of Weld County Ordinance 60-B. In addition, System shall pay for the services rendered by Health Department pursuant to this Agreement according to the contracted amount set forth in Section 3, above, and/or as may be mutually agreed to by the parties hereto. Payment shall be due within ten (10) days upon of receipt of the bill. Billing will be sent within ten (10) days of the quarter ending: i.e., March 31, June 30, September 30, and December 31, 1994. Section 7 - Waiver of Immunities/Duty of Care: No portion of this Agreement shall be deemed to constitute a waiver of any immunities the parties or their officers or employees may now possess, nor shall any portion of this Agreement be deemed to or created a duty of care with the respect to any persons not a party to this Agreement. Page 2 of 3 921259 y Burrito Delight Agreement for the Sampling and Analysis of Drinking Water Section 8 - Severability: If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of the Agreement is for any reason held or decided to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions hereof. The parties hereto declare that they would have entered into this Agreement and each and every section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, and phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, or phrases may be declared to be unconstitutional or inva',;id. Section 9 - Notices: All notices to the parties shall be sent to the following: Entity: Burriton Delight Contact Person: Jess Ramirez Address: 1230 Denver Avenue City, State, Zip:Ft. Lupton, CO 80621 Phone: (303) 857-0927 BY: Signed this,Q day of 4-072074, 114 :7„ " "SXSTEM TITLE OF AUTHORITY: Entity: Weld County Health Department Contact Person: Judy Schmidt Address: 1517 16th Avenue Court City, State, Zip: Greeley, CO 80631 Phone: (303)353-0635 extension 2249 , 19 93 . COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO BY AND THROUGH THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY ON BEHALF OF THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPAR BY: ( 1QyySTir�L Chairman ATTEST: Weld Count r BY: V /2//3/93 Clerk to the eputy Cle k • 'the Boar Approved by: WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT <kll. M.S.E.H. ckle, M.S.E.H. rector Weld County Health Department Page 3 of 3 921259 AA. N0V 3014fr I!� DRINKING WATER AGREEMENT FOR THE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS OF DRINKING WATER BY THE WELD COUNTY'HEALTH DEPARTMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered. into this _Lusk day of November , 19 93_, by and between CENTRAL WELD COUNTY WATER DISTRICT , whose address is , hereinafter referred to as "System," and the County of Weld, State of Colorado, by and through the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, on behalf of the Weld County Health Department, whose office is located at 1517 16th Avenue Court, Greeley, Colorado 80631, hereinafter referred to as "Health Department." WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B authorizes the Weld County Health Department to perform by agreement the testing of drinking water for suppliers thereof and the testing of pollutant discharges for those persons and entities holding permits to discharge pollutants into state waters, and WHEREAS, system supplies 20,Q00,-spersons with drinking water, and WHEREAS, Health Department possesses the necessary equipment and expertise required to perform the sampling and analysis of the drinking water for System as required by federal law, and WHEREAS, the services provided by Health Department pursuant to this Agreement shall benefit the health, safety, and welfare of those persons residing within the area served by System. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: Section 1 - Authorization to Act: The System hereby authorizes Health Department to perform the services listed in this Agreement and in Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B, for the testing of Drinking Water on behalf of System. The provisions of Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B are incorporated herein in their entirety. Health Department shall act as an independent contractor in relation to the System in the performance of services set forth in this Agreement. None of the Health Department employees and/or agents shall become employees of System, and no employees of System shall be deemed or become employees of the Health Department by virtue of this Agreement. Section 2 - Term: This Agreement shall become effective on January 1, 1994, and shall remain in full force and effective until December 31, 1994, unless and until otherwise terminated sooner, pursuant to the provisions of Section 5 below. Page 1 of 4 .1:,1259 Central Weld County Water District Agreement for the Sampling and Analysis of Drinking Water Section 3 - Services to be Provided by Health Department: Health Department agrees to provide the following services to System during the term of this Agreement: Type of Test Bacteriological (Total Coliform) Bacteriological (Total Coliform) Resample Confirmation Lead Analysis Copper Analysis Note: If multiple resamples are taken on the same day, same location - the first sample is $22.50, each additional sample is $6.50. Methods used by Health Department in providing said services shall be in accordance with Section I(b) of the Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B. Health Department shall provide further services as mutually agreed upon by Health Department and System at times and for compensation as agreed to by the parties hereto. By signing this Agreement and providing the services herein, Health Department does not insure the accuracy of the results of any tests performed by Health Department and does not make any representations as to the adequacy of Systems compliance with federal or state. law governing the sampling of drinking water. Contracted Number of Samples Contracted Fee Routine Sample $15.00 each Requested Collected As Submitted As Submitted As Required As Submitted As Submitted $ 6.50 each $ 6.50 each $15.00 each $ 5.00 each $ 5.00 each is Agreement. Section 5 - Termination: Either party may terminate this Agreement upon written notice to the other party at the addresses set forth below. Section 6 - Obligations and Duties of System: System shall perform all of the obligations and duties set forth in Section II(c) of Weld County Ordinance 60-B. In addition, System shall pay for the services rendered by Health Department pursuant to this Agreement according to the contracted amount set forth in Section 3, above, and/or as may be mutually agreed to by the parties hereto. Payment shall be due within ten (10) days upon of receipt of the bill. Billing will be sent within ten (10) days of the quarter ending: i.e., March 31, June 30, Page 2 of 4 L. • a - Central Weld County Water District Agreement for the Sampling and Analysis of Drinking Water will be sent within ten (10) days of the quarter ending: i.e., March 31, June 30, September 30, and December 31, 1994. Section 7 - Waiver of Immunities/Duty of Care: No portion of this Agreement shall be deemed to constitute a waiver of any immunities the parties or their officers or employees may now possess, nor shall any portion of this Agreement be deemed to or created a duty of care with the respect to any persons not a party to this Agreement. Section 8 - Severability: If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of the Agreement is for any reason held or decided to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions hereof. The parties hereto declare that they would have entered into this Agreement and each and every section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, and phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, or phrases may be declared to be unconstitutional or invalid. Section 9 - Notices: All notices to the parties shall be sent to the following: Entity: Central Weld County Water Dist Contact Person: John Zadel Address: 2235 2nd Avenue City, State, Zip: Greeley, CO Phone: (303) 352-1284 Entity: Weld County Health Department Contact Person: Judy Schmiot Address: 1517 16th Avenue Court 80631 City, State, Zip: Greeley, CO 80631 Phone: (303)353-0635 extension 2249 Page 3 of 4 921259 Central Weld County Water District Agreement for the Sampling and Analysis of Drinking Water BY: his 18th:;.. of ,..November , 19 93 . "SYSTEM TITLE OF AUTHORITY: President Central Weld County Water District COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO BY AND THROUGH THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY ON BEHALF OF THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT BY: de,77rs.�-ii,-/ Chairman ATTE /42//3/q3 d ¢puat Clerk to the BY: 1 D p t Clerk 6 thee Approved by: WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT Jo. S. Pic le, M.S.E.H. rector Weld County Health Department Page 4 of 4 9'31259 r- nr3r7r7Prir-• fill N0V 2-9'199$1 DRINKING WATER AGREEMENT FOR THE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS OF DRINKING WATER BY THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this /i day of /tt3nti3,t,. 9 , by and between TOWN OF EATON _, whose address is hereinafter stem." and the County of Weld, State of Colorado,by and referred through the y Boardof County Commissioners of Weld County, on behalf of the Weld County Health Department, whose office is located at 1517 16th Avenue Court, Greeley, Colorado 80631, hereinafter referred to as "Health Department." WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Weld County Ordinance No. 60-8 authorizes the Weld County Health Department to perform by agreement the testing of drinking water for suppliers thereof and the testing of pollutant discharges for those persons and entities holding permits to discharge pollutants into state waters, and WHEREAS, system supplies 2/cc persons with drinking water, and WHEREAS, Health Department possesses the necessary equipment and expertise required to perform the sampling and analysis of the drinking water for System as required by federal law, and WHEREAS, the services provided by Health Department pursuant to this Agreement shall benefit the health, safety, and welfare of those persons residing within the area served by System. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: Section 1 - Authorization to Act: The System hereby authorizes Health Department to perform the services listed in this Agreement and in Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B, for the testing of Drinking Water on behalf of System. The provisions of Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B are incorporated herein in their entirety. Health Department shall act as an independent contractor in relation to the System in the performance of services set forth in this Agreement. None of the Health Department employees and/or agents shall become employees of System, and no employees of System shall be deemed or become employees of the Health Department by virtue of this Agreement. Section 2 - Term: This Agreement shall become effective on January 1, 1994, and shall remain in full force and effective until December 31, 1994, unless and until otherwise terminated sooner, pursuant to the provisions of Section 5 below. Page 1 of 3 931259 Town of Eaton Agreement for the Sampling and Analysis of Drinking Water Section 3 - Services to be Provided by Health Department: Health Department agrees to provide the following services to System during the term of this Agreement: Type of Test Bacteriological (Total Coliform) Resample Confirmation Contracted Number of Samples Routine Sample (two per month - minimum) As Required As Required Contracted Fee $17.00 each $22.50 each $15.00 each Note: If multiple resamples are taken on the same day, same location - the first sample is $22.50, each additional sampel is $6.50 Methods used by Health Department in providing said services shall be in accordance with Section I(b) of the Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B. Health Department shall provide further services as mutually agreed upon by Health Department and System at times and for compensation as agreed to by the parties hereto. By signing this Agreement and providing the services herein, Health Department does not insure the accuracy of the results of any tests performed by Health Department and does not make any representations as to the adequacy of Systems compliance with federal or state law governing the sampling of drinking water. Section 4 - Release and Hold Harmless: The System agrees to release and hold harmless Health Department from any and all liability and/or damages resulting from the acts or omissions of Health Department in performing the services set forth in this Agreement. Section 5 - Termination: Either party may terminate this Agreement upon 30 days written notice to the other party at the addresses set forth below. Section 6 - Obligations and Duties of System: System shall perform all of the obligations and duties set forth in Section II(c) of Weld County Ordinance 60-B. In addition, System shall pay for the services rendered by Health Department pursuant to this Agreement according to the contracted amount set forth in Section 3, above, and/or as may be mutually agreed to by the parties hereto. Payment shall be due within ten (10) days upon of receipt of the bill. Billing will be sent within ten (10) days of the quarter ending: i.e., March 31, June 30, September 30, and December 31, 1994. Section 7 - Waiver of Immunities/Duty of Care: No portion of this Agreement shall be deemed to constitute a waiver of any immunities the parties or their officers or employees may now possess, nor shall any portion of this Agreement be deemed to or created a duty of care with the respect to any persons not a party to this Agreement. Page 2 of 3 912..59 If • Town of Eaton Agreement for the Sampling and Analysis of Drinking Water Section 8 - Severability: If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of the Agreement is for any reason held or decided to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions hereof. The parties hereto declare that they would have entered into this Agreement and each and every section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, and phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, or phrases may be declared to be unconstitutional or invalid. Section 9 - Notices: All notices to the parties shall be sent to the following: Entity: Town of Eaton Contact Person: Gary Carsten Address: P. O. Box 946 City, State, Zip: Eaton, CO 80615 Phone: (303) 454-3338 72 'SYSTEM' TITLE OF AUTHORITY: Entity: Weld CountyHealth Department Contact Person: Judy Schmidt Address: 1517 16th Avenue Court City, State, Zip: Greeley, CO 80631 Phone: (303)353-0635 extension 2249 f Nvvav ..e , 19 . COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO BY AND THROUGH THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY ON BEHALF OF THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPAR BY: Chairman /472 /3/9,3 ATTES Wel ty lerk to the BY: eputy Clerk o Approved by: WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT Pickle, M.S.E.H. irector Weld County Health Department Page 3 of 3 921259 r- r---7773751111 NOV 3019931 I DRINKING WATER AGREEMENT FOR THE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS OF DRINKING WATER BY THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 7O day of j1O4.x2 0°- 19 by and between CITY OF FORT LOPT'ON , whose address is Po\4 (30 5 vlc..kt,te , hereinafter referred to as "System," and the County of Weld, State of Colorado, by and through the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, on behalf of the Weld County Health Department, whose office is located at 1517 16th Avenue Court, Greeley, Colorado 80631, hereinafter referred to as "Health Department." WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B authorizes the Weld County Health Department to perform by agreement the testing of drinking water for suppliers thereof and the testing of pollutant discharges for those persons and entities holding permits to discharge pollutants into state waters, and WHEREAS, system supplies 5Y00 ;persons with drinking water, and WHEREAS, Health Department possesses the necessary equipment and expertise required to perform the sampling and analysis of the drinking water for System as required by federal law, and WHEREAS, the services provided by Health Department pursuant to this Agreement shall benefit the health, safety, and welfare of those persons residing within the area served by System. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: Section 1 - Authorization to Act: The System hereby authorizes Health Department to perform the services listed in this Agreement and in Weld County Ordinance No. 60-8, for the testing of Drinking Water on behalf of System. The provisions of Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B are incorporated herein in their entirety. Health Department shall act as an independent contractor in relation to the System in the performance of services net forth in this Agreement. None of the Health Department employees and/or agents shall become employees of System, and no employees of System shall be deemed or become employees of the Health Department by virtue of this Agreement. Section 2 - Term: This Agreement shall become effective on January 1, 1994, and shall remain in full force and effective until December 31, 1994, unless and until otherwise terminated sooner, pursuant to the provisions of Section 5 below. Page 1 of 3 921259 City of Fort Lupton Agreement for the Sampling and Analysis of Drinking Water Section 3 - Services to be Provided by Health Department: Health Department agrees to provide the following services to System during the term of this Agreement: Type of Test Bacteriological (Total Coliform) Resample Confirmation Nitrate Contracted Number of Samples Routine Sample (six per month - minimum) As required As required As submitted Contracted Fee $17.00 each $22.50 each $15.00 each $ 6.40 each Note: If multiple resamples are taken on the same day, same location - the first sample is $22.50, each additional sample is $6.50 Methods used by Health Department in providing said services shall be in accordance with Section I(b) of the Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B. Health Department shall provide further services as mutually agreed upon by Health Department and System at times and for compensation as agreed to by the parties hereto. By signing this Agreement and providing the services herein, Health Department does not insure the accuracy of the results of any tests performed by Health Department and does not make any representations as to the adequacy of Systems compliance with federal or state law governing the sampling of drinking water. Section 4 - Release and Hold Harmless: The System agrees to release and hold harmless Health Department from any and all liability and/or damages resulting from the acts or omissions of Health Department in performing the services set forth in this Agreement. Section 5 - Termination: Either party may terminate this Agreement upon 30 days written notice to the other party at the addresses set forth below. Section 6 - Obligations and Duties of System: System shall perform all of the obligations and duties set forth in Section II(c) of Weld County Ordinance 60-B. In addition, System shall pay for the services rendered by Health Department pursuant to this Agreement according to the contracted amount set forth in Section 3, above, and/or as may be mutually agreed to by the parties hereto. Payment shall be due within ten (10) days upon of receipt of the bill. Billing will be sent within ten (10) days of the quarter ending: i.e., March 31, June 30, September 30, and December 31, 1994. Section 7 - Waiver of Immunities/Duty of Care: No portion of this Agreement shall be deemed to constitute a waiver of any immunities the parties or their officers or employees may now possess, nor shall any portion of this Agreement Page 2 of 3 932.259 City of Fort Lupton Agreement for the Sampling and Analysis of Drinking Water be deemed to or created a duty of care with the respect to any persons not a party to this Agreement. Section 8 - Severability: If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of the Agreement is for any reason held or decided to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions hereof. The parties hereto declare that they would have entered into this Agreement and each and every section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, and phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, or phrases may be declared to be unconstitutional or invalid. Section 9 - Notices: All notices to the parties shall be sent to the following: Entity: City of Ft. Lupton Contact Person: Bob Alberts Address: P. 0. Box 148 City, State, Zip: Ft. Lupton, CO 80621 Phone: (303) 857-9442 Entity: Weld County Health Department Contact Person: Judy Schmidt Address: 1517 16th Avenue Court City, State, Zip: Greeley, CO 80631 Phone: (303)353-0635 extension 2249 Signed this 3O' day of I.s;a,er.be- , 19 73 . BY: C (T`J oF .){ L COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO BY "SYSTEM" TITLE OF AUTHORITY: CJ4 c ( o Pe/ ice -7 AND THROUGH THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY ON BEHALF OF THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT BY:4r-Li.�¢r..��:a� ✓ l Chairman /4/13/93 ATTEST: Weld County Clerk to the Bo BY: D puty Clerk • STe Board Approved by: WELD '.' / DEP T . Pickle, M.S.E.H. rector Weld County Health Department Page 3 of 3 921251 Il DEC 0 2 1993) 75 55th Id DECO219951 DRINKING WATER AGREEMENT FOR THE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS OF DRINKING WATER BY THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 3044_ day of Arjoihwthor, 1993 , by and between TOWN O1? FREDERICK , whose address is eo Bex gas �.vdoa. se/c Ca Sos3o , hereinafter referred to as "System," and the County of Weld, State of Colorado, by and through the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, on behalf of the Weld County Health Department, whose office is located at 1517 16th Avenue Court, Greeley, Colorado 80631, hereinafter referred to as "Health Department." WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B authorizes the Weld County Health Department to perform by agreement the testing of drinking water for suppliers thereof and the testing of pollutant discharges for those persons and entities holding permits to discharge pollutants into state waters, and WHEREAS, system supplies boo persons with drinking water, and WHEREAS, Health Department possesses the necessary equipment and expertise required to perform the sampling and analysis of the drinking water for System as required by federal law, and WHEREAS, the services provided by Health Department pursuant to this Agreement shall benefit the health, safety, and welfare of those persons residing within the area served by System. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: Section 1 - Authorization to Act: The System hereby authorizes Health Department to perform the services listed in this Agreement and in Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B, for the testing of Drinking Water on behalf of System. The provisions of Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B are incorporated herein in their entirety. Health Department shall act as an independent contractor in relation to the System in the performance of services set forth in this Agreement. None of the Health Department employees and/or agents shall become employees of System, and no employees of System shall be deemed or become employees of the Health Department by virtue of this Agreement. Section 2 - Term: This Agreement shall become effective on January 1, 1994, and shall remain in full force and effective until December 31, 1994, unless and until otherwise terminated sooner, pursuant to the provisions of section,5 below. Page 1 of 3 9L12cn Town of Frederick Agreement for the Sampling and Analysis of Drinking Water Section 3 - Services to be Provided by Health Department: Health Department agrees to provide the following services to System during the term of this Agreement: Type of Test Contracted Number of Samples Bacteriological (Total Coliform) Resample Confirmation Routine Sample (two per month - minimum) As Required Contracted Fee $17.00 each $22.50 each As Required $15.00 each Note: If multiple resamples are taken on the same day, same location - the first sample is $22.50, each additional sample is $6.50 Methods used by Health Department in providing said services shall be in accordance with Section I(b) of the Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B. Health Department shall provide further services as mutually agreed upon by Health Department and System at times and for compensation as agreed to by the parties hereto. By signing this Agreement and providing the services herein, Health Department does not insure the accuracy of the results of any tests performed by Health Department and does not make any representations as to the adequacy of Systems compliance with federal or state law governing the sampling of drinking water. Section 4 - Release and Hold Harmless: The System agrees to release and hold harmless Health Department from any and all liability and/or damages resulting from the acts or omissions of Health Department in performing the services set forth in this Agreement. Section 5 - Termination: Either party may terminate this Agreement upon 30 days written notice to the other party at the addresses set forth below. Section 6 - Obligations and Duties of System: System shall perform all of the obligations and duties set forth in Section II(c) of Weld County Ordinance 60-B. In addition, System shall pay for the services rendered by Health Department pursuant to this Agreement according to the contracted amount set forth in Section 3, above, and/or as may be mutually agreed to by the parties hereto. Payment shall be due within ten (10) days upon of receipt of the bill. Billing will be sent within ten (10) days of the quarter ending: i.e., March 31, June 30, September 30, and December 31, 1994. Section 7 - Waiver of Immunities/Duty of Care: No portion of this Agreement shall be deemed to constitute a waiver of any immunities the parties or their officers or employees may now possess, nor shall any portion of this Agreement be deemed to or created a duty of care with the respect to any persons not a party to this Agreement. Page 2 of 3 9212159 . Town of Frederick Agreement for the Sampling and Analysis of Drinking Water Section 8 - Severability: If any sect.on, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of the Agreement is for any reason held or decided to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions hereof. The parties hereto declare that they would have entered into this Agreement and each and every section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, and phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, or phrases may be declared to be unconstitutional or invalid. Section 9 - Notices: All notices to the parties shall be sent to the following: Entity: Town of Frederick Contact Person: Address: P. 0. Box 435 City, State, Zip: Frederick, CO 80530 Phone: (303) 833-2388 Entity: Weld County Health Department Contact Person: Judy Schmidt Address: 1517 16th Avenue Court City, State, Zip: Greeley, CO 80631 Phone: (303)353-0635 extension 2249 Signed this 2o4Cday of Aloy„.,clms , 1998 • BY: 10Lon/ OF FRtpotttasc "SYSTEM" TITLE OF AUTHORITY: MS Vat COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO BY AND THROUGH THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY ON BEHALF OF THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTME BY: (4.12J�ninrsi/ if Chairman /2 /3/93 Wel Co Clerk to the 0 A ST: BY: eputy Clerk o the Board Approved by: WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT J• • S. Pickle, M.S.E.H. irector Weld County Health Department Page 3 of 3 931?,59 •° 1 1 '. _CM 0`6'1993; 114 DRINKING WATER AGREEMENT FOR THE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS OF DRINKING WATER BY THE WELD COUNTY PEALTH DEPARTMENT ,,THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this /3).-t day of ,d/1!'1/N.QG,-4 19 ce , by and between JOHN'S MEATS , whose address is , hereinafter referred to as "System," and the County of Weld, State of Colorado, by and through the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, on behalf of the Weld County Health Department, whose office is located at 1517 16th Avenue Court, Greeley, Colorado 80631, hereinafter referred to as "Health Department." WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B authorizes the Weld County Health Department to perform by agreement the testing of drinking water for suppliers thereof and the testing of pollutant discharges for those persons and entities holding permits to discharge pollutants into state waters, and WHEREAS, system supplies ( U persons with drinking water, and WHEREAS, Health Department possesses the necessary equipment and expertise required to perform the sampling and analysis of the drinking water for System as required by federal law, and WHEREAS, the services provided by Health Department pursuant to this Agreement shall benefit the health, safety, and welfare of those persons residing within the area served by System. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: Section 1 - Authorization to Act: The System hereby authorizes Health Department to perform the services listed in this Agreement and in Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B, for the testing of Drinking Water on behalf of System. The provisions of Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B are incorporated herein in their entirety. Health Department shall act as an independent contractor in relation to the System in the performance of services set forth in this Agreement. None of the Health Department employees and/or agents shall become employees of System, and no employees of System shall be deemed or become employees of the Health Department by virtue of this Agreement. Section 2 - Term: This Agreement shall become effective on January 1, 1994, and shall remain in full force and effective until December 31, 1994, unless and until otherwise terminated sooner, pursuant to the provisions of Section 5 below. Page 1 of 3 931?.59 John's Meats Agreement for the Sampling and Analysis of Drinking Water Section 3 - Services to be Provided by Fealth Department: Health Department agrees to provide the following services to System during the term of this Agreement: Type of Test Contracted Number of Samples Contracted Fee Bacteriological Routine Sample $21.00 each (Total Coliform) (one per quarter) Resample As Required $22.50 each Confirmation As Required $15.00 each Note: If multiple resamples are taken on the same day, same location - the first sample is $22.50, each additional sample is $6.50. Methods used by Health Department in providing said services shall be in accordance with Section I(b) of the Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B. Health Department shall provide further services as mutually agreed upon by Health Department and System at times and for compensation as agreed to by the parties hereto. By signing this Agreement and providing the services herein, Health Department does not insure the accuracy of the results of any tests performed by Health Department and does not make any representations as to the adequacy of Systems compliance with federal or state law governing the sampling of drinking water. Section 4 - Release and Hold Harmless: The System agrees to release and hold harmless Health Department from any and all liability and/or damages resulting from the acts or omissions of Health Department in performing the services set forth in this Agreement. Section 5 - Termination: Either party may terminate this Agreement upon 30 days written notice to the other party at the addresses set forth below. Section 6 - Obligations and Duties of System: System shall perform all of the obligations and duties set forth in Section II(c) of Weld County Ordinance 60-B. In addition, System shall pay for the services rendered by Health Department pursuant to this Agreement according to the contracted amount set forth in Section 3, above, and/or as may be mutually agreed to by the parties hereto. Payment shall be due within ten (10) days upon of receipt of the bill. Billing will be sent within ten (10) days of the quarter ending: i.e., March 31, June 30, September 30, and December 31, 1994. Section 7 - Waiver of Immunities/Duty of Care: No portion of this Agreement shall be deemed to constitute a waiver of any immunities the parties or their officers or employees may now possess, nor shall any portion of this Agreement be deemed to or created a duty of care with the respect to any persons not a party to this Agreement. Page 2 of 3 921259 John's Meats Agreement for the Sampling and Analysis of Drinking Water Section 8 - Severability: If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of the Agreement is for any reason held or decided to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions hereof. The parties hereto declare that they would have entered into this Agreement and each and every section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, and phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, or phrases may be declared to be unconstitutional or invalid. Section 9 - Notices: All notices to the parties shall be sent to the following: Entity: John's Meats Inc. Contact Person: Brian Willard Address: 15958 WCR 4 City, State, Zip: Brighton, CO 80601 Phone: (303) 659-3887 BY: Entity: Weld County Health Department Contact Person: Judy Schmidt Address: 1517 16th Avenue Court City, State, Zip: Greeley, CO 80631 Phone: (303)353-0635 extension 2249 Signed this ( Sk day of 1 heCCw,bes-- 9 s i "SYSTEM" TITLE OF AUTHORITY: .1943. COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO BY AND THROUGH THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY ON BEHALF OF THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPAR BY: Chairman : Weld /x-/3/93 tzk to the BY:iZz� J// e ty Clerk th Boar Approved by: WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT . P c e, M.S.E.H. irector Weld County Health Department Page 3 of 3 931259 77Pg7 -7 if II)1R1�2 1!996 DRINKING WATER AGREEMENT FOR THE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS OF DRINKING WATER BY THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT 1949, IS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this i3 day of ax.u4'-, by and between LARIMER COUNTY whose address is , hereinafter referred to as "System," and the County of Weld, State of Colorado. by and through the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, on behalf of the Weld County Health Department. whose office is located at 1517 16th Avenue Court, Greeley, Colorado 80631, hereinafter referred to as "Health Department." WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Weld County Ordinance No. 60-8 authorizes the Weld County Health Department to perform by agreement the testing of drinking water for suppliers thereof and the testing of pollutant discharges for those persons and entities holding permits to discharge pollutants into state waters, and WHEREAS, system supplies persons with drinking water, and WHEREAS, Health Department possesses the necessary equipment and expertise required to perform the sampling and analysis of the drinking water for System as required by federal law, and WHEREAS, the services provided by Health Department pursuant to this Agreement shall benefit the health, safety, and welfare of those persons residing within the area served by System. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: Section 1 - Authorization to Act: The System hereby authorizes Health Department to perform the services listed in this Agreement and in Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B, for the testing of Drinking Water on behalf of System. The provisions of Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B are incorporated herein in their entirety. Health Department shall act as an independent contractor in relation to the System in the performance of services set forth in this Agreement. None of the Health Department employees and/or agents shall become employees of System, and no employees of System shall be deemed or become employees of the Health Department by virtue of this Agreement. Section 2 - Term: This Agreement shall become effective on January 1. 1994, and shall remain in full force and effective until December 31, 1994, unless and until otherwise terminated sooner, pursuant to the provisions of Section 5 below. Page 1 of 3 331259 Larimer County Agreement for the Sampling and Analysis of Drinking Water Section 3 - Services to be Provided by Health Department: Health Department agrees to provide the following services to System during the term of this Agreement: Type of Test Bacteriological (Total Coliform) Confirmation Staphylococcus aureus Pseudomonas aeruginosa Contracted NumSer of Samples Contracted Fee As Submitted $ 6.50 each As Required $15.00 each As Submitted $17.00 each As Submitted $17.00 each Methods used by Health Department in providing said services shall be in accordance with Section 1(b) of the Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B. Health Department shall provide further services as mutually agreed upon by Health Department and System at times and for compensation as agreed to by the parties hereto. By signing this Agreement and providing the services herein, Health Department does not insure the accuracy o: the results of any tests performed by Health Department and does not make any representations as to the adequacy of Systems compliance with federal or state law governing the sampling of drinking water. Section 4 - Release and Hold Harmless: The System agrees to release and hold harmless Health Department from any and all liability and/or damages resulting from the acts or omissions of Health Department in performing the services set forth in this Agreement. Section 5 - Termination: Either party may terminate this Agreement upon 30 days written notice to the other party at the addresses set forth below. Section 6 - Obligations and Duties of System: System shall perform all of the obligations and duties set forth in Section 1I(c) of Weld County Ordinance 60-B. In addition, System shall pay for the services rendered by Health Department pursuant to this Agreement according to the contracted amount set forth in Section 3, above, and/or as may be mutually agreed to by the parties hereto. Payment shall be due within ten (10) days upon of receipt of the bill. Billing will be sent within ten (10) days of the quarter ending: i.e., March 31, June 30, September 30. and December 31, 1994. Section 7 - Waiver of Immunities/Duty of Care: No portion of this Agreement shall be deemed to constitute a waiver of any immunities the parties or their officers or employees may now possess, nor shall any portion of this Agreement be deemed to or created a duty of care with the respect to any persons not a party to this Agreement. Page 2 of 3 921259 1 Larimer County Agreement for the Sampling and Analysis of Drinking Water Section 8 - Severability: If any section, subsection, paragraph. sentence. clause, or phrase of the Agreement is for any reason held or decided to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions hereof. The parties hereto declare that they would have entered into this Agreement and each and every section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, and phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, or phrases may be declared to be unconstitutional or invalid. Section 9 - Notices: All notices to the parties shall be sent to the following: Entity: Entity: Weld County Health Department Contact Person: Contact Person: Judy Schmidt Address: Address: 1517 16th Avenue Court City, State, Zip: City, State, Zip: Greeley, CO 80631 Phone: Phone: (303)353-0635 extension 2249 Signed this le)-4day of S 4.4-- , 19 9.3 . BY: 214. "SYSTEM" TITLE OF AUTHORITY: COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO BY AND THROUGH THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY ON BEHALF OF THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMEN BY: � s -c/ re -/1 Chairman /ah5/93 ATTE T: Weld Count B ar eputy Clerk o Clerk to the Approved by: WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT Pickle, M.S.E.H. rector Weld County Health Department Page 3 of 3 931253 DRINKING WATER AGREEMENT FOR THE SAMPLING AID ANALYSIS OF DRINKING WATER BY THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this /O day of 191L, by andtbetween MITEHI LIVESTOCK AUCTION , whose address is o9C 1 k( / g- rerry.F, "1A , 'hereinafter referred to as "System," and the County of Weld, State of Colorado, by and through the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, on behalf of the Weld County Health Department, whose office is located at 1517 16th Avenue Court, Greeley, Colorado 80631, hereinafter referred to as "Health Department." WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Weld County Ordinance No. 60-8 authorizes the Weld County Health Department to perform by agreement the testing of drinking water for suppliers thereof and the testing of pollutant discharges for those persons and entities holding permits to discharge pollutants into state waters, and WHEREAS, system supplies persons with drinking water, and WHEREAS, Health Department possesses the necessary equipment and expertise required to perform the sampling and analysis of the drinking water for System as required by federal law, and WHEREAS, the services provided by Health Department pursuant to this Agreement shall benefit the health, safety, and welfare of those persons residing within the area served by System. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: Section 1 - Authorization to Act: The System hereby authorizes Health Department to perform the services listed in this Agreement and in Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B, for the testing of Drinking Water on behalf of System. The provisions of Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B are incorporated herein in their entirety. Health Department shall act as an independent contractor in relation to the System in the performance of services set forth in this Agreement. None of the Health Department employees and/or agents shall become employees of System, and no employees of System shall be deemed or become employees of the Health Department by virtue of this Agreement. Section 2 - Term: This Agreement shall become effective on January 1, 1994, and shall remain in full force and effective until December 31, 1994, unless and until otherwise terminated sooner, pursuant to the provisions of Section 5 below. Page 1 of 3 931259 Mile Hi Livestock Auction Agreement for the Sampling and Analysis of Drinking Water Section 3 - Services to be Provided by Health Department: Health Department agrees to provide the following services to System during the term of this Agreement: Type of Test Bacteriological (total coliform) Resample Confirmation Contracted Number of Samples Contracted Fee Routine Sample (one per quarter) As required $21.00 each $22.50 each As required $15.00 each Note: If multiple resamples are taken on the same day, same location - the first sample is $22.50, each additional sample is $6.50. Methods used by Health Department in providing said services shall be in accordance with Section I(b) of the Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B. Health Department shall provide further services as mutually agreed upon by Health Department and System at times and for compensation as agreed to by the parties hereto. By signing this Agreement and providing the services herein, Health Department does not insure the accuracy of the results of any tests performed by Health Department and does not make any representations as to the adequacy of Systems compliance with federal or state law governing the sampling of drinking water. Section 4 - Release and Hold Harmless: The System agrees to release and hold harmless Health Department from any and all liability and/or damages resulting from the acts or omissions of Health Department in performing the services set forth in this Agreement. Section 5 - Termination: Either party may terminate this Agreement upon 30 days written notice to the other party at the addresses set forth below. Section 6 - Obligations and Duties of System: System shall perform all of the obligations and duties set forth in Section II(c) of Weld County Ordinance 60-B. In addition, System shall pay for the services rendered by Health Department pursuant to this Agreement according to the contracted amount set forth in Section 3, above, and/or as may be mutually agreed to by the parties hereto. Payment shall be due within ten (10) days upon of receipt of the bill. Billing will be sent within ten (10) days of the quarter ending: i.e., March 31, June 30, September 30, and December 31, 1994. Section 7 - Waiver of Immunities/Duty of Care: No portion of this Agreement shall be deemed to constitute a waiver of any immunities the parties or their officers or employees may now possess, nor shall any portion of this Agreement be deemed to or created a duty of care with the respect to any persons not a party to this Agreement. Page 2 of 3 921259 Mile Hi Livestock Auction Agreement for the Sampling and Analysis of Drinking Water Section 8 - Severability: If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of the Agreement is for any reason held or decided to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions hereof. The parties hereto declare that they would have entered into this Agreement and each and every section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, and phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, or phrases may be declared to be unconstitutional or invalid. Section 9 - Notices: All notices to the parties shall be sent to the following: Entity: Mile Hi Livestock Contact Person: Brad Olson Address: P. 0. Box 546 City, State, Zip: Lafayette, CO 80026 Phone: (303) 665-9991 TITLE OF AUTHORITY: L71 -4-k. ; bet kck Entity: Weld County Health Department Contact Person: Judy Schmidt Address: 1517 16th Avenue Court City, State, Zip: Greeley, CO 80631 Phone: (303)353-0635 extension 2249 Il) ..1(e1 199. COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO BY AND THROUGH THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY ON BEHALF OF THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMEN BY: ATTEWeld C,punty, Clerk to the r BY: y Y1��L eputy Clerk d the Boar Approved by: WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT a. Pickle, M.S.E. rector Weld County Health Department Page 3 of 3 9312,59 4'N0V30$' n DRINKING WATER AGREEMENT FOR THE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS OF DRINKING WATER BY THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 3 day of Nom✓+^"" , 19 , by and between MILE HI SHOOTING PARK, INC. , whose address is J�.1s (; 14401.7 ,u,sr, 4O Eros /4 , hereinafter referred to as "System," and the County of Weld, State of Colorado, by and through the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, on behalf of the Weld County Health Department, whose office is located at 1517 16th Avenue Court, Greeley, Colorado 80631, hereinafter referred to as "Health Department." WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B authorizes the Weld County Health Department to perform by agreement the testing of drinking water for suppliers thereof and the testing of pollutant discharges for those persons and entities holding permits to discharge pollutants into state waters, and WHEREAS, system supplies / persons with drinking water, and WHEREAS, Health Department possesses the necessary equipment and expertise required to perform the sampling and analysis of the drinking water for System as required by federal law, and WHEREAS, the services provided by Health Department pursuant to this Agreement shall benefit the health, safety, and welfare of those persons residing within the area served by System. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: Section 1 - Authorization to Act: The System hereby authorizes Health Department to perform the services listed in this Agreement and in Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B, for the testing of Drinking Water on behalf of System. The provisions of Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B are incorporated herein in their entirety. Health Department shall act as an independent contractor in relation to the System in the performance of services set forth in this Agreement. None of the Health Department employees and/or agents shall become employees of System, and no employees of System shall be deemed or become employees of the Health Department by virtue of this Agreement. Section 2 - Term: This Agreement shall become effective on January 1, 1994, and shall remain in full force and effective until December 31, 1994, unless and until otherwise terminated sooner, pursuant to the provisions of Section 5 below. Page 1 of 3 921259 Mile Hi Shooting Park, Inc. Agreement for the Sampling and Analysis of Drinking Water Section 3 - Services to be Provided by Health Department: Health Department agrees to provide the following services to System during the term of this Agreement: Type of Test Bacteriological (Total Coliform) Resample Confirmation Contracted Number of Samples Contracted Fee Routine Sample $21.00 each (one per quarter) As Required $22.50 each As Required $15.00 each Note: If multiple resamples are taken on the same day, same location - the first sample is $22.50, each additional sample is $6.50. Methods used by Health Department in providing said services shall be in accordance with Section I(b) of the Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B. Health Department shall provide further services as mutually agreed upon by Health Department and System at times and for compensation as agreed to by the parties hereto. By signing this Agreement and providing the services herein, Health Department does not insure the accuracy of the results of any tests performed by Health Department and does not make any representations as to the adequacy of Systems compliance with federal or state law governing the sampling of drinking water. Section 4 - Release and Hold Harmless: The System agrees to release and hold harmless Health Department from any and all liability and/or damages resulting from the acts or omissions of Health Department in performing the services set forth in this Agreement. Section 5 - Termination: Either party may terminate this Agreement upon 30 days written notice to the other party at the addresses set forth below. Section 6 - Obligations and Duties of System: System shall perform all of the obligations and duties set forth in Section 1I(c) of Weld County Ordinance 60-B. In addition, System shall pay for the services rendered by Health Department pursuant to this Agreement according to the contracted amount set forth in Section 3, above, and/or as may be mutually agreed to by the parties hereto. Payment shall be due within ten (10) days upon of receipt of the bill. Billing will be sent within ten (10) days of the quarter ending: i.e., March 31, June 30, September 30, and December 31, 1994. Section 7 - Waiver of Immunities/Duty of Care: No portion of this Agreement shall be deemed to constitute a waiver of any immunities the parties or their officers or employees may now possess, nor shall any portion of this Agreement be deemed to or created a duty of care with the respect to any persons not a party to this Agreement. Page 2 of 3 921259 Mile Hi Shooting Park, Inc. Agreement for the Sampling and Analysis of Drinking Water Section 8 - Severability: If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence. clause, or phrase of the Agreement is for any reason held or decided to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions hereof. The parties hereto declare that they would have entered into this Agreement and each and every section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, and phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, or phrases may be declared to be unconstitutional or invalid. Section 9 - Notices: All notices to the parties shall be sent to the following: Entity: Mile Hi Shooting Park Contact Person: Ida Wiens Address: 1745 Colo. Hwy. 7 City, State, Zip: Erie, CO 80516 Phone: (303) 665-9991 Entity: Weld County Health Department Contact Person: Judy Schmidt Address: 1517 16th Avenue Court City, State, Zip: Greeley, CO 80631 Phone: (303)353-0635 extension 2249 Signed this .O 3 day o£ /t41LerM.( BY: PVC /%.' s1.d + frd4k "SYSTEM" TITLE OF AUTHORITY: , 19 /c3 . COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO BY AND THROUGH THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY ON BEHALF OF THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT BY: Chairman /. /5/93 ATTE : Weld Count Clerk to the eputy C erk to the Boa BY: Approved by: WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT A S. Pickle, M.S.E.H. irector Weld County Health Department Page S of 3 921259 V r AP( ; t ?DRINKING WATER )13_ DEC 4 a 1993 IL, AGREEMENT FOR THE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS OF DRINKING WATER BY THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 6 day of ace nLt r , 19 93 , by and between MILLARD REFRIGERATION SERVICES , whose address is .R'o/ /44 Me. 2'cdsY Co 20671 , hereinafter referred to as "System," and the County of Weld. Stdt'e of Colorado, by and through the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, on behalf of the Weld County Health Department. whose office is located at 1517 16th Avenue Court, Greeley, Colorado 80631, hereinafter referred to as "Health Department." WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B authorizes the Weld County Health Department to perform by agreement the testing of drinking water for suppliers thereof and the testing of pollutant discharges for those persons and entities holding permits to discharge pollutants into state waters, and WHEREAS, system supplies 9 persons with drinking water, and WHEREAS, Health Department possesses the necessary equipment and expertise required to perform the sampling and analysis of the drinking water for System as required by federal law, and WHEREAS, the services provided by Health Department pursuant to this Agreement shall benefit the health, safety, and welfare of those persons residing within the area served by System. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: Section 1 - Authorization to Act: The System hereby authorizes Health Department to perform the services listed in this Agreement and in Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B, for the testing of Drinking Water on behalf of System. The provisions of Weld County Ordinance No. 60-8 are incorporated herein in their entirety. Health Department shall act as an independent contractor in relation to the System in the performance of services set forth in this Agreement. None of the Health Department employees and/or agents shall become employees of System, and no employees of System shall be deemed or become employees of the Health Department by virtue of this Agreement. Section 2 - Term: This Agreement shall become effective on January 1, 1994. and shall remain in full force and effective until December 31, 1994, unless and until otherwise terminated sooner, pursuant to the provisions of Section 5 below. Page 1 of 3 921259 Millard Refrigeration Services Agreement for the Sampling and Analysis of Drinking Water Section 3 - Services to be Provided by Health Department: Health Department agrees to provide the following services to System during the term of this Agreement: Type of Test Bacteriological (Total Coliform) Resample Confirmation Contracted Number of Samples Routine Sample (one per quarter) As Required Contracted Fee $21.00 each $22.50 each As Required $15.00 each Note: If multiple resamples are taken on the same day, same location - the first sample is $22.50, each additional sample is $6.50. Methods used by Health Department in providing said services shall be in accordance with Section 1(b) of the Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B. Health Department shall provide further services as mutually agreed upon by Health Department and System at times and for compensation as agreed to by the parties hereto. By signing this Agreement and providing the services herein, Health Department does not insure the accuracy of the results of any tests performed by Health Department and does not make any representations as to the adequacy of Systems compliance with federal or state law governing the sampling of drinking water. Section 4 - Release and Hold Harmless: The System agrees to release and hold harmless Health Department from any and all liability and/or damages resulting from the acts or omissions of Health Department in performing the services set forth in this Agreement. Section 5 - Termination: Either party may terminate this Agreement upon 30 days written notice to the other party at the addresses set forth below. Section 6 - Obligations and Duties of System: System shall perform all of the obligations and duties set forth in Section 11(c) of Weld County Ordinance 60-B. In addition, System shall pay for the services rendered by Health Department pursuant to this Agreement according to the contracted amount set forth in Section 3, above, and/or as may be mutually agreed to by the parties hereto. Payment shall be due within ten (10) days upon of receipt of the bill. Billing will be sent within ten (10) days of the quarter ending: i.e., March 31. June 30, September 30, and December 31, 1994. Section 7 - Waiver of Immunities/Duty of Care: No portion of this Agreement shall be deemed to constitute a waiver o:5 any immunities the parties or their officers or employees may now possess, nor shall any portion of this Agreement be deemed to or created a duty of care with the respect to any persons not a party to this Agreement. Page 2 of 3 921259 Millard Refrigeration Services Agreement for the Sampling and Analysis of Drinking Water Section 8 - Severability: If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of the Agreement is for any reason held or decided to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions hereof. The parties hereto declare that they would have entered into this Agreement and each and every section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, and phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, or phrases may be declared to be unconstitutional or invalid. Section 9 - Notices: All notices to the parties shall be sent to the following: Entity: Millard Refrigerated Services Contact Person: Mike Powers Address: 2901 1st Avenue City, State, Zip: Greeley, CO 80631 Phone: (303) 353-2055 Signed this 6 day of BY: Entity: Weld County Health Department Contact Person: Judy Schmidt Address: 1517 16th Avenue Court City, State, Zip: Greeley, CO 80631 Phone: (303)353-0635 extension 2249 % eccnber "SYSTEM" TITLE OF AUTHORITY: 7a/c_ eafed-s f�o/77' /7Zncfc.er 1993. COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO BY AND THROUGH THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY ON BEHALF OF THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPAR BY: (i•fd�p„ri.,:e1 Chairman -- /3//f3 af ATTEST: Weld County Clerk to the Bo. rd A BY: eputy Clerk to' the Board Approved by: WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT • Jobaft pickle, M.S.E. Director Weld County Health Department Page 3 of 3 931259 t:9'► DRINKING WATER AGREEMENT FOR THE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS OF DRINKING WATER BY THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT '/THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 57- day of l$PJLAR� 197 by and between MONFORT PORTION FOODS , whose address is 020 S Qnb !tom CiRAoki Co. row , hereinafter referred to as "System," and the County of Weld,rState of Colorado, by and through the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, on behalf of the Weld County Health Department, whose office is located at 1517 16th Avenue Court, Greeley, Colorado 80631, hereinafter referred to as "Health Department." WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B authorizes the Weld County Health Department to perform by agreement the testing of drinking water for suppliers thereof and the testing of pollutant discharges for those persons and entities holding permits to discharge pollutants into state waters, and WHEREAS, system supplies an persons with drinking water, and WHEREAS, Health Department possesses the necessary equipment and expertise required to perform the sampling and analysis of the drinking water for System as required by federal law, and WHEREAS, the services provided by Health Department pursuant to this Agreement shall benefit the health, safety, and welfare of those persons residing within the area served by System. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: Section 1 - Authorization to Act: The System hereby authorizes Health Department to perform the services listed in this Agreement and in Weld County Ordinance No. 60--B, for the testing of Drinking Water on behalf of System. The provisions of Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B are incorporated herein in their entirety. Health, Department shall act as an independent contractor in relation to the System in the performance of services set forth in this Agreement. None of the Health Department employees and/or agents shall become employees of System, and no employees of System shall be deemed or become employees of the Health Department by virtue of this Agreement. Section 2 - Term: This Agreement shall become effective on January 1, 1994, and shall remain in full force and effective until December 31, 1994, unless and until otherwise terminated sooner, pursuant to the provisions of Section 5 below. Page 1 of 3 a:1259 1 Monfort Portion Foods Agreement for the Sampling and Analysis of Drinking Water Section 3 - Services to be Provided by Health Department: Health Department agrees to provide the following services to System during the term of this Agreement: Type of Test Bacteriological (Total Coliform) Resample Confirmation Contracted Number of Samples Contracted Fee Routine Sample $17.00 each (one per quarter) As Required $22.50 each As Required $15.00 each Note: If multiple resamples are taken on the same day, same location - the first sample is $22.50, each additional sample is $6.50. Methods used by Health Department in providing said services shall be in accordance with Section I(b) of the Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B. Health Department shall provide further services as mutually agreed upon by Health Department and System at times and for compensation as agreed to by the parties hereto. By signing this Agreement and providing the services herein, Health Department does not insure the accuracy of the results of any tests performed by Health Department and does not make any representations as to the adequacy of Systems compliance with federal or state law governing the sampling of drinking water. Section 4 - Release and Hold Harmless: The System agrees to release and hold harmless Health Department from any and all liability and/or damages resulting from the acts or omissions of Health Department in performing the services set forth in this Agreement. Section 5 - Termination: Either party may terminate this Agreement upon 30 days written notice to the other party at the addresses set forth below. Section 6 - Obligations and Duties of System: System shall perform all of the obligations and duties set forth in Section 11(c) of Weld County Ordinance 60-B. In addition, System shall pay for the services rendered by Health Department pursuant to this Agreement according to the contracted amount set forth in Section 3, above, and/or as may be mutually agreed to by the parties hereto. Payment shall be due within ten (10) days upon of receipt of the bill. Billing will be sent within ten (10) days of the quarter ending: i.e., March 31, June 30, September 30, and December 31, 1994. Section 7 - Waiver of Immunities/Duty of Care: No portion of this Agreement shall be deemed to constitute a waiver of any immunities the parties or their officers or employees may now possess, nor shall any portion of this Agreement be deemed to or created a duty of care with the respect to any persons not a party to this Agreement. Page 2 of 3 91259 Monfort Portion Foods Agreement for the Sampling and Analysis of Drinking Water Section 8 - Severability: If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of the Agreement is for any reason held or decided to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions hereof. The parties hereto declare that they would have entered into this Agreement and each and every section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, and phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, or phrases may be declared to be unconstitutional or invalid. Section 9 - Notices: All notices to the parties shall be sent to the following: Entity: Monfort Portion Foods Contact Person: Richard Hannan Address: 2035 2nd Avenue City, State, Zip: Greeley, CO 80632 Phone: (303) 353-2311 extension 8355 Signed this nnl U /4day of 4o BY: 1 roar YoR,7 y) {poDJ "SYSTEM" TITLE OF AUTHORITY: Entity: Weld County Health Department Contact Person: Judy Schmidt Address: 1517 16th Avenue Court City. State, Zip: Greeley, CO 80631 Phone: (303)353-0635 extension 2249 A161161.13,61/ , 19 93 . COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO BY AND THROUGH THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY ON BEHALF OF THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT BY: [ 427t 77vl. Chairman BY: eputy Clerk o the Board l d� /af3/93 T. Weld County Clerk to the ait.d,47 Approved by: WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT S. Pickle, M.S.E.H. Director Weld County Health Department Page 3 of 3 931? -53 DRINKING WATER AGREEMENT FOR THE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS OF DRINKING WATER BY THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT IS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this h9 day of AL___ 19 , by and between NORTH WELD C0''3NTY WATER DISTRICT , whose address is ..'q??47, 4nteRC _Zacite, }, , hereinafter referred to as "System," and the County 'of Weld, State of Colorado, by and through the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County. on behalf of the Weld County Health Department, whose office is located at 1517 16th Avenue Court, Greeley, Colorado 80631, hereinafter referred to as "Health Department." WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B authorizes the Weld County Health Department to perform by agreement the testing of drinking water for suppliers thereof and the testing of pollutant discharges for those persons and entities holding permits to discharge pollutants into state waters, and WHEREAS, system supplies 7DDG persons with drinking water, and WHEREAS, Health Department possesses the necessary equipment and expertise required to perform the sampling and analysis of the drinking water for System as required by federal law, and WHEREAS, the services provided by Health Department pursuant to this Agreement shall benefit the health, safety, and welfare of those persons residing within the area served by System. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: Section 1 - Authorization to Act: The System hereby authorizes Health Department to perform the services listed in this Agreement and in Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B, for the testing of Drinking Water on behalf of System. The provisions of Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B are incorporated herein in their entirety. Health Department shall act as an independent contractor in relation to the System in the performance of services set forth in this Agreement. None of the Health Department employees and/or agents shall become employees of System, and no employees of System shall be deemed or become employees of the Health Department by virtue of this Agreement. Section 2 - Term: This Agreement shall become effective on January 1, 1994, and shall remain in full force and effective until December 31, 1994, unless and until otherwise terminated sooner, pursuant to the provisions of Section 5 below. Page 1 of 4 921259 North Weld County Water District Agreement for the Sampling and Analysis of Drinking Water Section 3 - Services to be Provided by Health Department: Health Department agrees to provide the following services to System during the term of this Agreement: Type of Test Bacteriological (Total Coliform) Resample Confirmation Copper Testing Lead Testing Contracted Number of Samples Contracted Fee Routine Sample $17.00 each (10 per month - minimum) As Required As Required As Required As Required $22.50 each $15.00 each $ 5.00 each $ 5.00 each Note: If multiple resamples are taken on the same day, same location - the first sample is $22.50, each additional sample is $6.50. Methods used by Health Department in providing said services shall be in accordance with Section I(b) of the Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B. Health Department shall provide further services as mutually agreed upon by Health Department and System at times and for compensation as agreed to by the parties hereto. By signing this Agreement and providing the services herein, Health Department does not insure the accuracy of the results of any tests performed by Health Department and does not make any representations as to the adequacy of Systems compliance with federal or state law governing the sampling of drinking water. Section 4 - Release and Hold Harmless: The System agrees to release and hold harmless Health Department from any and all liability and/or damages resulting from the acts or omissions of Health Department in performing the services set forth in this Agreement. Section 5 - Termination: Either party may terminate this Agreement upon 30 days written notice to the other party at the addresses set forth below. Section 6 - Obligations and Duties of System: System shall perform all of the obligations and duties set forth in Section II(c) of Weld County Ordinance 60-B. In addition, System shall pay for the services rendered by Health Department pursuant to this Agreement according to the contracted amount set forth in Section 3, above, and/or as may be mutually agreed to by the parties hereto. Payment shall be due within ten (10) days upon of receipt of the bill. Billing will be sent within ten (10) days of the quarter ending: i.e., March 31, June 30, September 30, and December 31, 1994. Page 2 of 4 921259 North Weld County Water District Agreement for the Sampling and Analysis of Drinking Water Section 7 - waiver of Immunities/Duty of Care: No portion of this Agreement shall be deemed to constitute a waiver of any immunities the parties or their officers or employees may now possess, nor shall any portion of this Agreement be deemed to or created a duty of care with the respect to any persons not a party to this Agreement. Section 8 - Severability: If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of the Agreement is for any reason held or decided to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions hereof. The parties hereto declare that they would have entered into this Agreement and each and every section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, and phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, or phrases may be declared to be unconstitutional or invalid. Section 9 - Notices: All notices to the parties shall be sent to the following: Entity: North Weld County Water Dist. Contact Person: Lyle D. Nelson Address: 33247 HWY 85, P.O. Box 56 City, State, Zip: Lucerne, CO 80646 Phone: (303) 356-3020 Entity: Weld County Health Department Contact Person: Judy Schmidt Address: 1517 16th Avenue Court City, State, Zip: Greeley, CO 80631 Phone: (303)353-0635 extension 2249 Page 3 of 4 921259 North Weld County Water District Agreement for the Sampling and Analysis of Drinking Water Signed this /8 day of idad , 19 93. BY: iktilldea,U arriitlir "SYSTEM" TITLE OF AUTHORITY: COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO BY AND THROUGH THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY ON BEHALF OF THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT BY: ATTES : Weld County Clerk to the BY: eputy Clerk Approved by: WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT S. Pickle, M.S.E.H. Director Weld County Health Department Page 4 of 4 931259 r- DEC oat' DRINKING WATER AGREEMENT FOR THE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS OF DRINKING WATER BY THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this JO day of )_..✓-- 19 by and between ROCKPORT CAFE , whose address is e.,./a, hereinafter referred to as "System," and the County' Weld, State of Colorado, by and through the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, on behalf of the Weld County Health Department, whose office is located at 1517 16th Avenue Court, Greeley, Colorado 80631, hereinafter referred to as "Health Department." WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B authorizes the Weld County Health Department to perform by agreement the testing of drinking water for suppliers thereof and the testing of pollutant discharges for those persons and entities holding permits to discharge pollutants into state waters, and WHEREAS, system supplies persons with drinking water, and WHEREAS, Health Department possesses the necessary equipment and expertise required to perform the sampling and analysis of the drinking water for System as required by federal law, and WHEREAS, the services provided by Health Department pursuant to this Agreement shall benefit the health, safety, and welfare of those persons residing within the area served by System. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: Section 1 - Authorization to Act: The System hereby authorizes Health Department to perform the services listed in this Agreement and in Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B, for the testing of Drinking Water on behalf of System. The provisions of Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B are incorporated herein in their entirety. Health Department shall act as an independent contractor in relation to the System in the performance of services set forth in this Agreement. None of the Health Department employees and/or agents shall become employees of System, and no employees of System shall be deemed or become employees of the Health Department by virtue of this Agreement. Section 2 - Term: This Agreement shall become effective on January 1, 1994, and shall remain in full force a,ld effective until December 31, 1994, unless and until otherwise terminated sooner, pursuant to the provisions of Section.5 below. Page of 3 921259 Rockport Cafe Agreement for the Sampling and Analysis of Drinking Water Section 3 - Services to be Provided by Health Department; Health Department agrees to provide the following services to System during the term of this Agreement: Type of Test Bacteriological (Total Coliform) Resample Confirmation Contracted Number of Samples Contracted Fee Routine Sample $21.00 each (one per quarter) As Required $22.50 each As Required $15.00 each Note: If multiple resamples are taken on the same day, same location - the first sample is $22.50, each additional sample is $6.50. Methods used by Health Department in providing said services shall be in accordance with Section I(b) of the Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B. Health Department shall provide further services as mutually agreed upon by Health Department and System at times and for compensation as agreed to by the parties hereto. By signing this Agreement ane.. providing the services herein, Health Department does not insure the accuracy of the results of any tests performed by Health Department and does not make any representations as to the adequacy of Systems compliance with federal or state law governing the sampling of drinking water. Section 4 - Release and Hold Harmless: The System agrees to release and hold harmless Health Department from any and all liability and/or damages resulting from the acts or omissions of Health Department in performing the services set forth in this Agreement. Section 5 - Termination: Either party may terminate this Agreement upon 30 days written notice to the other party at the addresses set forth below. Section 6 - Obligations and Duties of System: System shall perform all of the obligations and duties set forth in Section II(c) of Weld County Ordinance 60-B. In addition, System shall pay for the services rendered by Health Department pursuant to this Agreement according to the contracted amount set forth in Section 3, above, and/or as may be mutually agreed to by the parties hereto. Payment shall be due within ten (10) days upon of receipt of the bill. Billing will be sent within ten (10) days of the quarter ending: i.e., March 31, June 30, September 30, and December 31, 1994. Section 7 - Waiver of Immunities/Duty of Care: No portion of this Agreement shall be deemed to constitute a waiver of any immunities the parties or their officers or employees may now possess, nor shall any portion of this Agreement be deemed to or created a duty of care with the respect to any persons not a party to this Agreement. Page 2 of 3 931259 Rockport Cafe Agreement for the Sampling and Analysis of Drinking Water Section 8 - Severability: If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of the Agreement is for any reason held or decided to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions hereof. The parties hereto declare that they would have entered into this Agreement and each and every section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, and phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, or phrases may be declared to be unconstitutional or invalid. Section 9 - Notices: All notices to the parties shall be sent to the following: Entity: Rockport Cafe Contact Person: Leo Watchman Address: 62011 HWY 85 City, State, Zip: Carr, CO 80612 Phone: (303) 897-2323 Entity: Weld County Health Department Contact Person: Judy Schmidt Address: 1517 16th Avenue Court City, State, Zip: Greeley, CO 80631 Phone: (303)353-0635 extension 2249 Signed this ,..j9 day of , 19 9 3. BY: Gf/rlrc��..•i "SYSTEM" TITLE OF AUTHORITY: COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO BY AND THROUGH THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY ON BEHALF OF THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT BY: ATTES BY: Chairman 42 //MB Weld unty Clerk to the eputy Clerk • e Boar Approved by: WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT 1.-197/CPickle, M.S.E.H. 9Sirector Weld County Health Department Page 3 of 3 4 931259 0yr;LJiv/. j Ak DEC 01199V DRINKING WATER AGREEMENT FOR THE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS OF DRINKING WATER BY THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this /day of , by and Aetweens STUCKEY'S , whose address is -2. est q� q.i CJ�thereinafter referred to as "System," and the County of Weld, State of Colorado, by and through the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, on behalf of the Weld County Health Department, whose office is located at 1517 16th Avenue Court, Greeley, Colorado 80631, hereinafter referred to as "Health Department." WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B authorizes the Weld County Health Department to perform by agreement the testing of drinking water for suppliers thereof and the testing of pollutant discharges for those persons and entities holding permits to discharge pollutants into state waters, and WHEREAS, system supplies / 0 persons with drinking water, and WHEREAS, Health Department possesses the necessary equipment and expertise required to perform the sampling and analysis of the drinking water for System as required by federal law, and WHEREAS, the services provided by Health Department pursuant to this Agreement shall benefit the health, safety, and welfare of those persons residing within the area served by System. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: Section 1 - Authorization to Act: The System hereby authorizes Health Department to perform the services listed in this Agreement and in Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B, for the testing of Drinking Water on behalf of System. The provisions of Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B are incorporated herein in their entirety. Health Department shall act as an independent contractor in relation to the System in the performance of services set forth in this Agreement. None of the Health Department employees and/or agents shall become employees of System, and no employees of System shall be deemed or become employees of the Health Department by virtue of this Agreement. Section 2 - Term: This Agreement shall become effective on January 1, 1994, and shall remain in full force and effective until December 31, 1994, unless and until otherwise terminated sooner, pursuant to the provisions of Section 5 below. Page 1 of 3 921259 Stuckey's Agreement for the Sampling and Analysis of Drinking Water Section 3 - Services to be Provided by Health Department: Health Department agrees to provide the following services to System during the term of this Agreement: Type of Test Bacteriological (Total Coliform) Resample Confirmation Contracted Number of Samples Contracted Fee Routine Sample $21.00 each (one per quarter) As Required $22.50 each As Required $15.00 each Note: If multiple resamples are taken on the same day, same location - the first sample is $22.50, each additional sample is $6.50. Methods used by Health Department in providing said services shall be in accordance with Section I(b) of the Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B. Health Department shall provide further services as mutually agreed upon by Health Department and System at times and for compensation as agreed to by the parties hereto. By signing this Agreement and providing the services herein, Health Department does not insure the accuracy of the results of any tests performed by Health Department and does not make any representations as to the adequacy of Systems compliance with federal or state law governing the sampling of drinking water. Section 4 - Release and Hold Harmless: The System agrees to release and hold harmless Health Department from any and all liability and/or damages resulting from the acts or omissions of Health Department in performing the services set forth in this Agreement. Section 5 - Termination: Either party may terminate this Agreement upon 30 days written notice to the other party at the addresses set forth below. Section 6 - Obligations and Duties of System: System shall perform all of the obligations and duties set forth in Section II(c) of Weld County Ordinance 60-B. In addition, System shall pay for the services rendered by Health Department pursuant to this Agreement according to the contracted amount set forth in Section 3, above, and/or as may be mutually agreed to by the parties hereto. Payment shall be due within ten (10) days upon of receipt of the bill. Billing will be sent within ten (10) days of the quarter ending: i.e., March 31, June 30, September 30, and December 31, 1994. Section 7 - Waiver of Immunities/Duty of Care: No portion of this Agreement shall be deemed to constitute a waiver of any immunities the parties or their officers or employees may now possess, nor shall any portion of this Agreement be deemed to or created a duty of care with the respect to any persons not a party to this Agreement. Page 2 of 3 331259 Stuckey's Agreement for the Sampling and Analysis of Drinking Water Section 8 - Severability: If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of the Agreement is for any reason held or decided to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions hereof. The parties hereto declare that they would have entered into this Agreement and each and every section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, and phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, or phrases may be declared to be unconstitutional or invalid. Section 9 - Notices: All notices to the Entity: Stuckey's Pecan Shoppe Contact Person: Maria Alvarado Address: P. 0. Box 95 City, State, Zip: Rofigen, CO 80652 Phone: (303) 849-5345 BY: parties shall be sent to the following: Entity: Weld County Health Department Contact Person: Judy Schmidt Address: 1517 16th Avenue Court City, State, Zip: Greeley, CO 80631 Phone: (303)353-0635 extension 2249 Signed this 151 —day of 'Pe,i Q P r' , 19 e3 . kt S7uek'e yr Fra e,.N/t1 ' ' COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO BY "SYSTEM" AND THROUGH THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY ON BEHALF OF THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH TITLE OF AUTHORITY: DEPAR r2, a. Ra4i a. X 64tH Ja BY: Chairman /2//3/93 unty,Clerk to the eputy Clerk T. the Approved by: WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT S. Pickle, M.S.E.H. Director Weld County Health Department Page 3 of 3 8:31259 DRINKING WATER AGREEMENT FOR THE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS OF DRINKING WATER BY THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this / 19 9SYIMAR MANOR whose ad5, by and between day of�a dr.�„ 1226;1470d Count Road 2, Bri hto: eon, Co s m, is the County of Weld, State o£ Colorado,byand inafter referred to as "System," and Commissioners of Weld County, on behalf of the Weld County ough the CountyHealth Department, whose office is located at 1517 16th Avenue Court, Greeley, Colorado 80631, hereinafter referred to as "Health Department." WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B authorizes the Weld County Health Department to perform by agreement the testing of drinking water for suppliers thereof and the testing of pollutant discharges for those persons and entities holding permits to discharge pollutants into state waters, and WHEREAS, system supplies 396 approx.persons with drinking water, and artment possesses the necessary required WHEREAS, osperform the sampling and analysis of the drinking water aternt dfor�System as required by federal law, and WHEREAS, the services provided by Health Department pursuant to this Agreement shall benefit the health, safety, and welfare of those persons residing within the area served by System. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: Section 1 -Authorization to Act: The System hereby authorizes Health Department to perform the services listed in this Agreement and in Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B, for the testing of Drinking Water on behalf of System. The provisions of Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B are incorporated herein in their entirety. Health Department shall act as an independent contractor in relation to the System in the performance of services set forth in this Agreement. None of the Health Department employees and/or agents shall become employees of System, and no employees of System shall be deemed or become employees of the Health Department by virtue of this Agreement. Section 2 - Term: This Agreement shall become effective on January 1, 1994, and shall remain in full force and effective until December 31, 1994, unless and until otherwise terminated sooner, pursuant to the provisions of Section 5 below. Page 1 of 3 931259 Sylmar Manor Agreement for the Sampling and Analysis of Drinking Water Section 3 - Services to be Provided by Health Department: Health Department agrees to provide the following services to System during the term of this Agreement: Type of Test Bacteriological (Total Coliform) Resample Confirmation Contracted Number of Samples Contracted Fee Routine Sample $17.00 each (One per month - minimum) As Required $22.50 each As Required $15.00 each Note: If multiple resamples are taken on the same day, same location - the first sample is $22.50, each additional sample is $6.50. Methods used by Health Department in providing said services shall be in accordance with Section I(b) of the Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B. Health Department shall provide further services as mutually agreed upon by Health Department and System at times and for compensation as agreed to by the parties hereto. By signing this Agreement and providing the services herein, Health Department does not insure the accuracy of the results of any tests performed by Health Department and does not make any representations as to the adequacy of Systems compliance with federal or state law governing; the sampling of drinking water. Section 4 - Release and Hold Harmless: The System agrees to release and hold harmless Health Department from any and all liability and/or damages resulting from the acts or omissions of Health Department in performing the services set forth in this Agreement. Section 5 - Termination: Either party may terminate this Agreement upon 30 days written notice to the other party at the addresses set forth below. Section 6 - Obligations and Duties of System: System shall perform all of the obligations and duties set forth in Section 1I(c) of Weld County Ordinance 60-B. In addition. System shall pay for the services rendered by Health Department pursuant to this Agreement according to the contracted amount set forth in Section 3, above, and/or as may be mutually agreed to by the parties hereto. Payment shall be due within ten (10) days upon of receipt of the bill. Billing will be sent within ten (10) days of the quarter ending: i.e., March 31, June 30, September 30, and December 31, 1994. Section 7 - Waiver of Immunities/Duty of Care: No portion of this Agreement shall be deemed to constitute a waiver of any immunities the parties or their officers or employees may now possess, nor shall any portion of this Agreement be deemed to or created a duty of care with the respect to any persons not a party to this Agreement. Page 2 of 3 931259 • Sylmar Manor Agreement for the Sampling and Analysis of Drinking Water Section 8 - Severability: If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of the Agreement is for any reason held or decided to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions hereof. The parties hereto declare that they would have entered into this Agreement and each and every section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, and phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, or phrases may be declared to be unconstitutional or invalid. Section 9 - Notices: All notices to the parties shall be sent to the following: Entity: Sylmar LTD Contact Person: Robert Sasner * Address: 21610 Stnnehavpn ibive City, State, Zip: Yorba Linda, CA 92687 Phone: (714) 970-9345 Entity: Weld County Health Department Contact Person: Judy Schmidt Address: 1517 16th Avenue Court City, State, Zip: Greeley, CO 80631 Phone: (303)353-0635 extension 2249 Signed this /y"day of ,1/o 1993 • BY: Se,./* 4 -1 -14 -at "SYTEM .4 ,4405 TITLE OF AUTHORITY: s714.4 � e -7V. * Regarding Section 9 — Notices: In an emergency contact our Colorado representative Mr. Jonathan Mays Manager, Sylmar Manor Mobile Hare Park 12365 Weld County Road #2 Brighton, CO 80601 Phone: (303) 659-0569 44LCOUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO BY AND THROUGH THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY ON BEHALF OF THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPART71 BY: j.s•�", Chairman ATTEST: BY: Clerk to the Weld Courtly eputy Clerk to a Board Approved by: WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT Pickle, M.S.E.FS. irector Weld County Health Department Page 3 of 3 9312,59 DRINKING WATER AGREEMENT FOR THE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS OF DRINKING WATER BY THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 4.O -day of ikct 19 4)3, by and between USDA FOREST SERVICE , whose address is 660 "0" Street. Greeley. CO 80631 , hereinafter referred to as "System," and the County of Weld, State of Colorado, by and through the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, on behalf of the Weld County Health Department, whose office is located at 1517 16th Avenue Court, Greeley, Colorado 80631, hereinafter referred to as "Health Department." WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B authorizes the Weld County Health Department to perform by agreement the testing of drinking water for suppliers thereof and the testing of pollutant discharges for those persons and entities holding permits to discharge pollutants into state waters, and WHEREAS, system supplies * persons with drinking water, and WHEREAS, Health Department possesses the n4cessary equipment and expertise required to perform the sampling and analysis of the drinking water. for System as required by federal law, and WHEREAS, the services provided by Health Department pursuant to this Agreement shall benefit the health, safety, and welfare of those persons residing within the area served by System. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: Section 1 - Authorization to Act: The System hereby authorizes Health Department to perform the services listed in this Agreement and in Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B, for the testing of Drinking Water on behalf of System. The provisions of Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B are incorporated herein in their entirety. Health Department shall act as an independent contractor in relation to the System in the performance of services set forth in this Agreement. None of the Heano lthDepartment employees and/or agents shall become employees of System, and employees of System shall be deemed or become employees of the Health Department by virtue of this Agreement. Section 2 - Term: This Agreement shall become effective on January 1, 1994, and shall remain in full force and effective until December 31, 1994, unless and until otherwise terminated sooner, pursuant to the provisions of Section 5 below. * System supplies four residents at the Briggsdale Work Center year-round. Also serves 10-150 visitors per day at the Crow Valley Recreation Area from 5/1 - 9/30. Page 1 of 4 931259 USDA Forest Service Agreement for the Sampling and Analysis of Drinking Water Section 3 - Services to be Provided by Health Department: Health Department agrees to provide the following services to System during the term of this Agreement: Type of Test Contracted Number of Samples Bacteriological (Total Coliform) Resample Confirmation Note: If multiple resamples are taken on the same day, same location - the first sample is $22.50, each additional sample is $6.50. Methods used by Health Department in providing said services shall be in accordance with Section I(b) of the Weld County Ordinance No. B. Health Health Department shall provide further services as mutually agreed upon by Department and System at times and for compensation as agreed to by the parties hereto. By signing this Agreement and providing the services herein, Health Department does not insure the accuracy of the results of any tests performed by Health e any representations as to e adqcy of Systems Ocompliance with federal epartent and does not orkstate law governing the sampling ofedrinking water. Section 4 - Release and Hold Harmless: The System agrees to release and hold harmless Health Department from any and all liability and/or damages resulting from the acts or omissions of Health Department in performing the services set forth in this Agreement. Section 5 - Termination: Either party may terminate this Agreement upon 30 days written notice to the other party at the addresses set forth below. Section 6 - Obligations and Duties of System: System shall perform all of the obligations and duties set forth in Section I1(c) of Weld County Ordinance 60-B. In addition, System shall pay for the services rendered by Health Department pursuant to this Agreement according to the contracted amount set forth in Section 3, above, and/or as may be mutually agreed to by the parties hereto. Payment shall be due within ten (10) days upon of receipt of the bill. Billing will be sent within ten (10) days of the quarter ending: i.e., March 31, June 30, September 30, and December 31, 1994. Routine Sample (Work Station: One per month - minimum) Contracted Fee $17.00 each (Crow Valley Recreation Area: $17.00 each One per month - minimum when open) As Required $22.50 each As Required $15.00 each Page 2 of 4 9a1259 USDA Forest Service Agreement for the Sampling and Analysis of Drinking Water Section 7 - Waiver of Ismunitie2/Duty of Care: No portion of this Agreement shall be deemed to constitute a waiver of any immunities the parties or their officers or employees may now possess, nor shall any portion of this Agreement be deemed to or created a duty of care with the respect to any persons not a party to this Agreement. Section 8 - Severability: If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of the Agreement is for any reason held or decided to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions hereof. The parties hereto declare that they would have entered into this Agreement and each and every section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, and phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, or phrases may be declared to be unconstitutional or invalid. Section 9 - Notices: All notices to the parties shall be sent to the following: Pawnee National Grassland Entity: U.S. Forest Service Entity: Weld County Health Department Contact Person: $ud.Phillips Contact Person: Judy Schmidt Address: 660 0 Street Address: 1517 16th Avenue Court City, State, Zip: Greeley, CO 80631 City, State, Zip: Greeley, CO 80631 Phone: (303) 353-5004 Phone: (303)353-0635 extension 2249 Page 3 of 4 9219 USDA Forest Service Agreement for the Sampling and Analysis of Drinking Water day of AilM9Mth,A. Signed this BY: "111 G7Ql� TITLE OF AUTHORITY: DISTRICT RANGER , 7.9 q.3 . COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO BY AND THROUGH THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY ON BEHALF OF THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMEN BY: C_v L .1te1. Chairman %3/93 ATTEST: Weld County Clerk to the Bo rd BY: Deputy Cl rk-t• the Boar Approved by: WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT .Pickle, M.S.E.H. rector Weld County Health Department Page 4 of 4 331259 ..""-14 \OP& DEC o( ms .I i1 DRINKING WATER AGREEMENT FOR THE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS OF DRINKING WATER BY THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this el _ day of n , 1993 , by and between WATTENBURG IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION , whose address is WtWr / 4u.&1 , CvJp, , hereinafter referred to as "System," and the County of Weld, State of Colorado, by and through the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, on behalf of the Weld County Health Department. whose office is located at 1517 16th Avenue Court, Greeley, Colorado 80631, hereinafter referred to as "Health Department." WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B authorizes the Weld County Health Department to perform by agreement the testing of drinking water for suppliers thereof and the testing of pollutant discharges for those persons and entities holding permits to discharge pollutants into state waters, and WHEREAS, system supplies 4,oa persons with drinking water, and WHEREAS, Health Department possesses the necessary equipment and expertise required to perform the sampling and analysis of the drinking water for System as required by federal law, and WHEREAS, the services provided by Health Department pursuant to this Agreement shall benefit the health, safety, and welfare of those persons residing within the area served by System. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: Section 1 - Authorization to Act: The System hereby authorizes Health Department to perform the services listed in this Agreement and in Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B, for the testing of Drinking Water on behalf of System. The provisions of Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B are incorporated herein in their entirety. Health Department shall act as an independent contractor in relation to the System in the performance of services set forth in this Agreement. None of the Health Department employees and/or agents shall become employees of System, and no employees of System shall be deemed or become employees of the Health Department by virtue of this Agreement. Section 2 - Term: This Agreement shall become effective on January 1, 1994, and shall remain in full force and effective until December 31, 1994, unless and until otherwise terminated sooner, pursuant to the provisions of Section 5 below. Page 1 of 3 931259 Wattenburg Improvement Association Agreement for the Sampling and Analysis of Drinking Water Section 3 - Services to be Provided by Health Department: Health Department agrees to provide the following services to System during the term of this Agreement: Type of Test Bacteriological (Total Coliform) Resample Confirmation Contracted Number of Samples Contracted Fee Routine Sample $17.00 each (one per month - minimum) As Required $22.50 each As Required $15.00 each Note: If multiple resamples are taken on the same day, same location - the first sample is $22.50, each additional sample is $6.50. Methods used by Health Department in providing said services shall be in accordance with Section I(b) of the Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B. Health Department shall provide further services as mutually agreed upon by Health Department and System at times and for compensation as agreed to by the parties hereto. By signing this Agreement and providing the services herein, Health Department does not insure the accuracy of the results of any tests performed by Health Department and does not make any representations as to the adequacy of Systems compliance with federal or state law governing the sampling of drinking water. Section 4 - Release and Hold Harmless: The System agrees to release and hold harmless Health Department from any and all liability and/or damages resulting from the acts or omissions of Health Department in performing the services set forth in this Agreement. Section 5 - Termination: Either party may terminate this Agreement upon 30 days written notice to the other party at the addresses set forth below. Section 6 - Obligations and Duties of System: System shall perform all of the obligations and duties set forth in Section II(c) of Weld County Ordinance 60-B. In addition, System shall pay for the services rendered by Health Department pursuant to this Agreement according to the contracted amount set forth in Section 3, above, and/or as may be mutually agreed to by the parties hereto. Payment shall be due within ten (10) days upon of receipt of the bill. Billing will be sent within ten (10) days of the quarter ending: i.e., March 31, June 30, September 30, and December 31, 1994. Section 7 - Waiver of Immunities/Duty of Care: No portion of this Agreement shall be deemed to constitute a waiver of any immunities the parties or their officers or employees may now possess, ror shall any portion of this Agreement be deemed to or created a duty of care with the respect to any persons not a party to this Agreement. Page 2 of 3 931253 4 • BY: .74,14 N Wattenburg Improvement Association Agreement for the Sampling and Analysis of Drinking Water Section 8 - Severability: If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of the Agreement is for any reason held or decided to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions hereof. The parties hereto declare that they would have entered into this Agreement and each and every section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, and phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, paragraphs. sentences, clauses, or phrases may be declared to be unconstitutional or invalid. Section 9 - Notices: All notices to the parties shall be sent to the following: Entity: Wattenburg Imp. Asso. Entity: Weld County Health Department Contact Person:I-ins 1 r Ala (, g Contact Person: Judy Schmidt Address: /abut p't R 2y kU 45 Address: 1517 16th Avenue Court City, State, Zip:r3afl' Luppon _ r,, 54471 City, State, Zip: Greeley, CO 80631 Phone: 1045-70,2a Phone: (303)353-0635 extension 2249 Signed this 4L of ?ta "SYSTEM" TITLE OF AUTHORITY: pOPs.,dtNr err , 199s . COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO BY AND THROUGH THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY ON BEHALF OF THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT BY: ! it �-�t�/1r/J Q/1%4/ /.2//3/93 Chairman A ST: Weld County Clerk to the a BY: Deputy Cl Approved by: WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT Jo.. S. rector Weld County Health Department Page 3 of 3 931259 DRINKING WATER AGREEMENT FOR THE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS OF DRINKING WATER BY THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this /616' day of 11 eee/1%v,-- , 19 93 , by and between WELD COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT RE -10J , whose address is , hereinafter referred to as "System," and the County of Weld, State of Colorado, by and through the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, on behalf of the Weld County Health Department, whose office is located at 1517 16th Avenue Court, Greeley, Colorado 80631, hereinafter referred to as "Health Department." WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B authorizes the Weld County Health Department to perform by agreement the testing of drinking water for suppliers thereof and the testing of pollutant discharges for those persons and entities holding permits to discharge pollutants into state waters, and WHEREAS, system supplies persons with drinking water, and WHEREAS, Health Department possesses the necessary equipment and expertise required to perform the sampling and analysis of the drinking water for System as required by federal law, and WHEREAS, the services provided by Health Department pursuant to this Agreement shall benefit the health, safety, and welfare of those persons residing within the area served by System. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: Section 1 - Authorization to Act: The System hereby authorizes Health Department to perform the services listed in this Agreement and in Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B, for the testing of Drinking Water on behalf of System. The provisions of Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B are incorporated herein in their entirety. Health Department shall act as an independent contractor in relation to the System in the performance of services set forth in this Agreement. None of the Health Department employees and/or agents shall become employees of System, and no employees of System shall be deemed or become employees of the Health Department by virtue of this Agreement. Section 2 - Term: This Agreement shall become effective on January 1, 1994, and shall remain in full force and effective until December 31. 1994, unless and until otherwise terminated sooner, pursuant to the provisions of Section 5 below. Page 1 of 3 921259 -i Weld County School District RE -10J Agreement for the Sampling and Analysis of Drinking Water Section 3 - Services to be Provided by Health Department: Health Department agrees to provide the following services to System during the term of this Agreement: Wee of Test Contracted Number of Samples Bacteriological (Total Coliform) Resample Confirmation Note: If multiple resamples are taken on the same day, same location - the first sample is $22.50, each additional sample is $6.50. Methods used by Health Department in providing said services shall be in accordance with Section I(b) of the Weld County Ordinance Nupon o.60 -B. Health Department shall provide further services as mutually agreed � he Health parties Department and System at times and for compensation as agreed to by hereto. By signing this Agreement and providing the services herein, Health Department does not insure the accuracy of the results of any tests performed by Health Department and does not make any representations as to the adequacy of Systems compliance with federal or state law governing the sampling of drinking water. Section 4 - Release and Hold Harmless: The System agrees to release and hold harmless Health Department from any and all liability and/or damages resulting from the acts or omissions of Health Department in performing the services set forth in this Agreement. Section 5 - Termination: Either party may terminate this Agreement upon 30 days written notice to the other party at the addresses set forth below. Section 6 - Obligations and Duties of System: System shall perform all of the obligations and duties set forth in Section II(c) of Weld County Ordinance 60-B. In addition, System shall pay for the services rendered by Health Department pursuant to this Agreement according to the contracted amount set forth in Section 3, above, and/or as may be mutually agreed to by the parties leherl og Payment shall be due within ten (10) days upon of receipt of the will be sent within ten (10) days of the quarter ending: i.e., March 31, June 30, September 30, and December 31, 1994. Section 7 - Waiver of Immunities/Duty of Care: No portion of this Agreement shall be deemed to constitute a waiver of any immunities the parties or their officers or employees may now possess, nor shall any portion of this Agreement be deemed to or created a duty of care with the respect to any persons not a party to this Agreement. Routine Sample (two per quarter) As Required As Required $15.00 each Contracted Fee $21.00 each $22.50 each Page 2 of 3 931259 Weld County School District RE -10J Agreement for the Sampling and Analysis of Drinking Water Section 8 - Severability: If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of the Agreement is for any reason held or decided to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions hereof. The parties hereto declare that they would have entered into this Agreement and each and every section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, and phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, or phrases may be declared to be unconstitutional or invalid. Section 9 - Notices: All notices to the parties shall be sent to the following: Entity: Weld County School Dist RE -10J Contact Person: Richard Hodgson Address: P. O. Box 125 City, State, Zip: Briggsdale, CO 80611 Phone: (303) 656-3417 Entity: Weld County Health Department Contact Person: Judy Schmidt Address: 1517 16th Avenue Court City, State, Zip: Greeley, CO 80631 Phone: (303)353-0635 extension 2249 Signed this 2t day of BY:_____ u "SYSTEM" TITLE OF AUTHORITY: , 197s . COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO BY AND THROUGH THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY ON BEHALF OF THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH. DEPAR BY: ( 2 cn,/ 8/93 Chairman Clerk to the Approved by: WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT C le, M.S.E.H. rector Weld County Health Department Page 3 of 3 931259 Stied2310 DRINKING WATER AGREEMENT FOR THE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS OF DRINKING WATER BY THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this .ae- day of 1"'donp/.0 . 19.15 , by and between TOWN OF WINDSOR , whose address is 3e/ .444, 7. Si g0'hM, to. , hereinafter referred to as "System," and the County of Weld, State of Colorado, by and through the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, on behalf of the Weld County Health Department, whose office is located at 1517 16th Avenue Court, Greeley, Colorado 80631, hereinafter referred to as "Health Department." WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B authorizes the Weld County Health Department to perform by agreement the testing of drinking water for suppliers thereof and the testing of pollutant discharges for those persons and entities holding permits to discharge pollutants into state waters, and WHEREAS, system supplies 4/Co persons with drinking water, and WHEREAS, Health Department possesses the necessary equipment and expertise required to perform the sampling and analysis of the drinking water for System as required by federal law, and WHEREAS, the services provided by Health Department pursuant to this Agreement shall benefit the health, safety, and welfare of those persons residing within the area served by System. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: Section 1 - Authorization to Act: The System hereby authorizes Health Department to perform the services listed in this Agreement and in Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B, for the testing of Drinking Water on behalf of System. The provisions of Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B are incorporated herein in their entirety. Health Department shall act as an independent contractor in relation to the System in the performance of services set forth in this Agreement. None of the Health Department employees and/or agents shall become employees of System, and no employees of System shall be deemed or become employees of the Health Department by virtue of this Agreement. Section 2 - Term: This Agreement shall become effective on January 1, 1994, and shall remain in full force and effective until December 31. 1994, unless and until otherwise terminated sooner, pursuant to the provisions of Section 5 below. Page 1 of 3 931259 a Town of Windsor Agreement for the Sampling and Analysis of Drinking Water Section 3 - Services to be Provided by Health Department: Health Department agrees to provide the following services to System during the term of this Agreement: Type of Test Bacteriological (Total Coliform) Confirmation Contracted Number of Samples Contracted Fee Routine Samples Delivered $ 6.50 each (Six samples per month - minimum) As Required $15.00 each Methods used by Health Department in providing said services shall be in accordance with Section I(b) of the Weld County Ordinance No. 60-B. Health Department shall provide further services as mutually agreed upon by Health Department and System at times and for compensation as agreed to by the parties hereto. By signing this Agreement and providing the services herein, Health Department does not insure the accuracy of the results of any tests performed by Health Department and does not make any representations as to the adequacy of Systems compliance with federal or state law governing the sampling of drinking water. Section 4 - Release and Hold Harmless: The System agrees to release and hold harmless Health Department from any and all liability and/or damages resulting from the acts or omissions of Health Department in performing the services set forth in this Agreement. Section 5 - Termination; Either party may terminate this Agreement upon 30 days written notice to the other party at the addresses set forth below. Section 6 - Obligations and Duties of System: System shall perform all of the obligations and duties set forth in Section II(c) of Weld County Ordinance 60-B. In addition, System shall pay for the services rendered by Health Department pursuant to this Agreement according to the contracted amount set forth in Section 3. above, and/or as may be mutually agreed to by the parties hereto. Payment shall be due within ten (10) days upon of receipt of the bill. Billing will be sent within ten (10) days of the quarter ending: i.e., March 31, June 30, September 30, and December 31, 1994. Section 7 - Waiver of Immunities/Duty of Care: No portion of this Agreement shall be deemed to constitute a waiver of any immunities the parties or their officers or employees may now possess, nor shall any portion of this Agreement be deemed to or created a duty of care with the respect to any persons not a party to this Agreement. Page 2 of 3 931259 Town of Windsor Agreement for the Sampling and Analysis of Drinking Water Section 8 - Severabilit : If any section, subsection, clause, or phrase of the Agreement is for any reason held orr deci ed to aphcbe invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions hereof. The parties hereto declare that they would have entered into this Agreement and each and every section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, and phrase thereof' irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, or phrases may be declared to be unconstitutional or invalid. Section 9 - Notices: All notices to the parties shall be sent to the following: Entity: Town of Windsor Contact Person: Ter Walker Address: 301 Walnut treet City, State, Zip: Windsor CO 80550 Phone: 303 686-7476 BY: Signed this Entity: Weldty Health Department Contact Person: Jud Schmidt Address: 1517 16th Avenue Court City, State, Zip: Greele CO 80631 Phone: 303 353-0635 exsi tenon 2249 day of t , 19 93 . O "SYSTEM" TITLE OF AUTHORITY: COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO BY AND THROUGH THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY ON BEHALF OF THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPAR"" •- BY: Chairman /-2/13/93 ATTE T: Weld unty Clerk to the BY: eputy Clerk • the Board Approved by: WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT ckle, M.S.E.H. Di7€ctor Weld County Health Department Page 3 of 3 931259 AR23665DV ORDINANCE NO. 174-B IN THE MATTER OF A SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION FOR THE YEAR 1993 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF THE COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO: WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of the County of Weld, State of Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, Section 29-1-111.5, CRS, as amended, provides that if during the fiscal year the governing board deems it necessary, in view of the needs of the various offices or departments, it may transfer budgeted and appropriated monies from one or more spending agencies in the fund to one or more spending agencies in another fund and/or transfer budgeted appropriated monies between spending agencies within a fund, and WHEREAS, Section 29-1-111.5, CRS, as amended, provides that if during the fiscal year the governing body or any spending agency received unanticipated revenue or revenues not assured at the time of the adoption of the budget from any source other than the local government's property tax mill levy, the governing board of the local government may authorize the expenditure of these unanticipated or unassured funds by enacting a supplementary budget and appropriation, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County has been advised that supplemental appropriations in accordance with the above need to be made in fiscal year 1993 in the General Fund, Road and Bridge Fund, Social Services Fund, Health Fund, Human Resources Fund, Solid Waste Fund, Housing Authority Fund, Capital Expenditures Fund, Conservation Trust Fund, Ambulance Fund, Health Insurance IGS Fund, Printing and Supply Fund, Computer Services Fund, and PBX lGS Fund, as more fully set forth in Exhibits "A" through "N", attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and WHEREAS, this is a case of an emergency caused by a contingency which would not have been reasonably foreseen at the time of the adoption of the 1993 budget, and WHEREAS, by Section 29-3-114, CRS, as amended, the governing board of a county does, in an emergency situation, have authority for the expenditure of funds in excess of said budget, by Ordinance duly adopted by two-thirds of the vote of the governing body. B 1419 REC 02366504 12/29/93 15:31 $0.00 1/032 F 1397 MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK & RECORDER WELD CO, CO ORD #174-B RE: ORDINANCE #174-B PAGE 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of County Commissioners of the County of Weld, State of Colorado, that the supplemental appropriations to the 1993 General Fund, Road and Bridge Fund, Social Services Fund, Health Fund, Human Resources Fund, Solid Waste Fund, Housing Authority Fund. Capital Expenditures Fund, Conservation Trust Fund. Ambulance Fund, Motor Pool Fund, Health Insurance IGS Fund, Printing and Supply Fund, Computer Services Fund, and PBX IGS Fund, as more fully set forth in Exhibits "A" through "N", which were made necessary by an emergency(ies) caused by a contingency(ies) which could not have been reasonably foreseen at the time of the adoption of the 1993 budget be, and hereby are, approved. BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED by the Board that an emergency exists which requires that this Supplemental Appropriation Ordinance No. 174-B is declared to be an emergency ordinance under the provision of Section 3-14 of the Weld County Home Rule Charter. The above and foregoing Ordinance Number 174-B was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 13th day of December. A.D., 1993. ATTEST: Weld County Clerk to the Board BY: LA Deputy ClerE''to the B aar APP TO •FO�tM�Ji` linty Attorney Published: December 9. 1993 Read and Approved: December 13, 1993 Published: December 16, 1993 Effective: December 13, 1993 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WEL COUNTY, COLORADO Constance rbezt, Chairman �I ' tkitAl W. . Webste • Pro-Tem G•• E. Baxte le K. Hall Barbara J. K rkmey r B 1419 REC 02366504 12/29/93 15:31 *0.00 2/032 F 1398 MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK & RECORDER WELD CO, CO ORD 11174-B RESOURCE FOR SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET APPROPRIATION yob/�! PAGE OF ACCOUNT CODE BUDGET LEDGER - FUND NAME PREVIOUS BUDGET NEW BUDGET Y C BE8REA9C- , FUND DEFT ACCOUNT p D E DEBIT INCftL 68.- CREDIT -e` 00 q/3c.C oo 01 oo1P1 3/.Z J B 00 y/,36r 00 /5-1 930 00 o21/0 OOO 00 G f 10/V! 3fl?/b 8 oo 72070 o0 -tr 00 .Wn?SU 00 01 Cool 3 ,z3 B oo S.2,0 00 -e- o0 lob 00 3a 1" 3 B o0 ' 'We:, 00 ' ) 333 o nc?3 o0 37. coo oo 19— 00,,2.50 000 oo 70oou 00 1o49!/J 00 J old_ B [30 n7 00 00 "6-- 00 / 3. C) 00 i 36.Z/ B 00 /j.5-00 00 300000 00 3025600 00 36.23 B 00 eZ530o 00 - 00 Soo 00 1 36n?Y B 00 S-50 00 /af7000 00 79000 00 I ,3G ?O -SS B n91)00 0 00 00 7`s 00 9000 00 1 _36y0 B 00 4000 00 .41,_- 00 G.2 yo 00 %92 B 00 029,00 00 -& 00 ‘,..co 00 t 34eiz-7RS4! B 00 b 00 . : 00 00 8 00 00 7.0o,, 00 /0X00 00 .7123CEOC B 00 3k6 00 -& 00 1/ yoo on 1 .5Sl/ B 00 // YUa 00 —6— 00 Jo2..5UO 00 /012- ?Lk? B 00 /0.750O 00 .2-200 00 3?oo 00 /o/'/ _7/S" B 00 /o0 00 1246 on 00 /n<COoO on /0„? 1 .3S-30 B 00 ,,,75-4X10 00 _.04 0(» 00 556-000 00 /031 311/0 B 00 1000C> 00 65700 00 /.2._90 on ti I /o y I 3 9/9 B 00 4000 00 0 00 o21Oo0 col CI ..215.1 379/0 B 00 00 U 00 75-000 no a 02g71 3 3 y0 B 00 aP/V00 7SZZa 00 o2Sy 99y 00 `/Oll9:1 00l 0 1 -2y,2U 3d2:/ B 00 J50OW 00 /'000 00 22ooc o 41 .&2o 39/9' 8 00 9o0O 00 ?WV) 00 3/ 960 on L1 jllo 133 yp 0E1'7 B 00 0q ✓ 0oo 00 6006 00' 01 ;It 3`'/ea B 00 ___2-2-00c, 23600 00 -6- 00 `l3 r 0O 0n' Of ioaS .2/ yo B 00 113100 oc Total Previous 00 -I y, /OV Total Increase eft �.-, - - / X1335 00 Total New ( On'1 Tota{' Dcf ease 1OPW1-- (/s/ fl7 00; Total 00 Total 00 D s s ttn� v[Jbb�v4 A[/Ly/y3 1 n31 #0.00 .3/032 F 1399 MARY ANN FEUERSTEZN CLERK & RECORDER WELD CO, Co RESOURCE FOR SUPPLEMENTAI. BUDGET APPROPRIATION afFUND NAME PREVIOUS BUDGET NEW BUDGET Jos- 9.Z /2 6'6 y 00 00 00 00 PACE OF //7f13U 00I p/ -6- 00 ooLL0/ 00 bf ACCOUNT CODE BUDGET LEDGER DEP'T _00j cbsDf 2fS C ACCOUNT - E 263-frmp4B 3630 PE65_, 3yt2 B DEBIT,, 00 /0260Y 00 00 CREDIT l/fd' /0"o ova 00 00 00 00 or 9(/() _2330 (1So -areB . B 00 00 000 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 D/ 00)1 a; 4) B B 445-74 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 B 00 B 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 a 00 B 00 B 00 B 00 a 00 B 00 B B B 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00i I B 00 00 B 00 B B B 00 00 00 00 00 100 00 00 00 OQ Total Previous 00 00 00 Total New Total i 007 E B TotaA I S ease • 00 00 00 "otrease 00 loo I00 • 418868l00 84,(.004( 00) '00 B 1419 REC 02366504 12/29/93 15:31 $0.00 4/032 F 1400 MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK & RECORDER WELD CO, CO SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET APPROPRIATION DISBURSEMENTS • & &li' JOURNAL ENTRY NUMBER FundName 6 / DATE EXPLANATION Fund Number PACE I of ACCOUNT CODE BUDGET LEDGER Ordinance Number PREVIOUS NEW BUDGET BUDGET FEND DEFT ACCOUNT n E (+IUOREA3E) DEBIT (DECRBASE) CREDIT oa poi 0! /0/I b390 B _3000 30 Oo, 00 000 co goon oat of Jo/2 62.1q B 90456 o0 -O- oo 300 O 0o G 33 S B 3000 00 00 / ?9/ oa ,24/791 bo \ I u 6 35'6 B 4000 00 oc 4/ nu 00 g.-oo 0 ,of loP? 437/ B y000 00 oa $ 00 .20cx o O1 /o5 e pV B a"o0_13 40 OR oa 0'500 od 4530 o j 432o B 4'j o0 /000 od 30o o too V/ �/ l ?5v B .OOO 00 ea / cr17Z oc o23,2 72 00 0 / /oaL 42/0 B 3Z eic) 00 00 '$ 00 53boo oo o.3/U B ,S3-000 00 Oq 00 140(700' 00 ;000 co i (,.j// B 00 3 roo 2.2000 Oq 4/0000 00 \ V / to oto B / ?oo0 00 i' = OS oq /006V2- oc //5-‘92 oo 6356 B /Svoo 00 1 o2s`Uo as 925v0 o0 0 / /o15 179,E B %Oo0 00 • 00 4/600 od SQobo 00 42/0 B 5.r00 U 00 00 4/200 ad O7 2oo 00 /3N B (27a000 00 OS oa od ,-.%oO{) 60 . 6 '3 / B 2o00 00 &6s-41 od 36sY 00 i 43‘15" B /bov oo ac -tr od SUSo o 00/ / 3So B SS -00 00 oc q 37,23 cc /13 723 ool +� 6354 B a0000 00 00 --e 0 / 9 2-0C.) 00 t/ I 99/n B /9 ?-0o 00 oa 177", 0d IS -7.7i oo 0 ► low G3So'koDe B fl000 00 oa Ct?7l oc b0971 00 \ 0 p oiC B /-Dodo 00 00 G2_,3&2 od .3 4 4z-) 00 i 1 b s3. B /5 0o0 00 CO .{5'7 3 roZ. od .3-g536 Zoo ,y 4356 B 3000o 00 0;5-0 700 od 'r,, 70U oo / ' 4370 B 0o 00 cC Total Previous 00 •: 15:31 Total Increase b. -V14 �/ 74 7X Total New ( 00) Total Decrease , tt h : edit'« ( 1 a ) ' To' B 1419 REC 02366504' 12/29/93' )A ;0.00 j;. l : ,. K JIi.: 5/032 .? (,4/'a.' F.f! s .•q . CO, CO .. ...; v r cuv.a rv.A, A: 1Y V ["i3�J 1 C�11Y Y..LGI{iY. Y i SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET APPROPRIATION DISBURSEMENTS 1J 3I CM ` 2z JOURNAL ENTRY NUMBER Fund Name DATE O / EXPLANATION Fund Number PAGE 1 of Ordinance Number ACCOUNT CODE BUDGET LEDGER PREVIOUS BUDGET NEW BUDGET FUND DEFT ACCOUNT C O (INCR:ABE) E DEBIT (DECREASE) CREDIT 00 0 0 , //Sl 4(0//0B 6000 oo pi 00 0 ,J/53 F B 00 p79000 00 OC 0 //9/ B 07‘-000 00 00 OC 0 . Mb B 00 70 060 OR OC 0 '/// B 9/00o 00 I 0 od oo 81LS B CO X0000 od o° 13/o B '0000 00 oo oq p?y/o B 00 00 00 _0o 00 3/fl B �taoo /000 00 00 00 00 / 3900 B 3cb4 00 00 OC oo ,S224.> B /GOO 00 00 OC 00 a 00 00 ° 00 B 00 OC 0 00 B 00 00 00 00 B 00 OS OC 00 00 B ! 00 OC 00 B 00 OC OC 00 B 00 OC 00 00 00 B 00 Oc 00 , B 00 OC oc 00 B 00 00 OC, 00 B 00 00 00 00 B • 00 00 oc 00 "B 00 °q 00 0C 00 B 00 Total Previous 00 Total Increase j,A- /99 0%O -00 • Total New ( 00) Total. / ` Decrease;•�,[�, ,;� r ,: Ct��Q��w 40j -• '..; -Tote g 1419 REC 02366504 12/29/93 15:31 •'$0 00 6/0:32 ,,. •„ ' F`_2402 -'MARX ANN—FEUERSTEXN CLERK & -RECORDER—WELD..-COr.CO. '•a SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET APPROPRIATION DISBURSEMENTS CO e44 e/ea, JOURNAL ENTRY NUMBER DATE Fund Name O EXPLANATION PAGE 1 0£ Fund Numb r ACCOUNT CODE ' BUDGET LEDGER Ordinance Number PREVIOUS BUDGET NEW BUDGET C FUN]) DEFT ACCOU T 0 E €144GRF�.tee, DEBIT fuL nLnJ CREDIT 53 00 .20o53 Do C/ A0 l a,?33t B '0000 00 oq i od /0000 001 l J3SCc, B /0000 p0 00 2'e oa 4b o kG 00 6.74e, ec B 5iO[60 00 00 79620 o0 996070 :o Al 625-0•Z FN B /,5`uo v 10 0c. _ 93,74' o5 L/9 ;3,2V _o V / b 4360 B 90606 p 00 o 35 0C, 13.5-6 00 of J3 63)M B /000 -0 Oc /6So oc 36Sv to /, 6376 B 2000 00 0c &g!) oc' 93-60 00 V 'Y 6.3)0 B 07000 00 OC /57 ?,77 OC r,2$1 n7 001 of BSI. /3SZ B /00000 00 oc oc 39443-'00 9 ? //s3 633-6 B (etoo 00 oc' ,2/665 3300 0o 530o 00 0! /►Sy 6337 B 02000 00 oc ‘000 oa 900o 00 0 I 1/.51/ l3 -St B 3000 00 oc 0q. 76 / 83 001 o t /WS-- 6 990 B SUW 0 00 OC , n9nr3 /y3"8£r od y3sk co o I 2 no 6226712AG /boo o 00 Oc 9y3a79 ,,2 0d ag3,274 o0 01 ,1►►O 6534 B 00 /30000 Oc /Dirt/ od 1 57.59 00 0/ (pill /220—CPM B c 0 00 OC YT 0a `/000 ci bo al p3- 619 2 B V•POOP 00 0c .s7 oc /350(..) 00 01 tir ‘72_0 a /3500 00 oc 1760 7 od • A-767 00 01 11 S 6.3vg- B tOO U 00 OC .6- od /0000 00 61 0.11►k 63SZ B 6000 00 04 6-673/0 0Q l&23)0 001 O/ ?i.2) G /10 B 00 / 000 0c 3'6011 OC 3ho 1 t 00 ' 6/y3 B 00 OOoo OC ylr,7/4 OC 0o j to/W B 00 .70 GOO oc 37g1q 0c ,..7,(-021q 171%1 y 00 / ,b /V B 00 /0 000 oq /Y/C6 0a 11/063 00 , 1/ 695—& . s 00 .3o voo ac -0— 0d /90 000 00 0► .2/So 63St a /90 000 00 OC Total 00 Total Increase ta5t �r / > q c≤oo 00 Previous Total New ( 00) .r 'Decrease KQ t•r,. C Q� (.3�S, • 00) Total` B '+w:!k nC SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET APPROPRIATION DISBURSEMENTS 0 &/i 'reelf/ JOURNAL ENTRY NUMBER Fund Name DATE EXPLANATION Fund Number PAGE 1 of Ordinance Number ACCOUNT CODE BUDGET LEDGER 7 PREVIOUS NEW C 0 4 BUDGET BUDGET FUND DEP'T ACCOUNT E 64 DEBIT (AN-aa-11.,i CREDIT .31 4931 00 46 zS2 0o 01 ?99Q 6_110 B 3z/7s co 0 op ,..2/ 7! 00 3/U Z po � /_f y3 B 9,3 00 OD 02 9 3 00 'iv 7 00 I o /y5// B .? y_yy 00 00 l /9/ od /�%Z Po 6Jy6 B //y1 00 00 04 poi _.-- -::. _- _ —.—r--73 - B 00 O-. OC 00 I QI oOO` Z,)800B ) SOQ 00 od 00 B 00 OC od oo B 00 00 00 00I B 00 OC 00 00 a 00 00 00 00 B 00 OC od 00 B 00 OC 00 00 B 00 OC 0q 00 B 00 OC 0 00 B 00 OC 00 00 B 00 oC 00 Oo B 00 0C OC 00 B 00 OC OC 00 B 00 Ofd OC 00 00 B 00 0C 00 B 00 oC OC 00 B 00 OC OC 00 B 00 CC OC 00 B 00 00 oc 00 1 00 CC OC, 00 B oo a Total Previous 00 _ _ Total Increase bpiwZ y(Z /)/p,g 00 Total New ( 00) Total n"�� , Decrease �X�� ( ,r8^;r: 00) , , , :Total B 1419 REC 02366504 F 1404 MARX 12/29/93 15:31 ,_:0.00 8/032 00 r^° ANN PEIIERSTEIN CLERK fi RECORDER —WELD co CO • �Vn" y ;!v •`. y74" ;7C774k. at�%YJi SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET APPROPRIATION DISBURSEMENTS U&9 r//eal JOURNAL ENTRY NUMBER Fund DATE %Naame V / EXPLANATION ;" , Fund Number PAGE 1 O£ Ordinance Number ACCOUNT CODE BUDGET LEDGER PREVIOUS NEW C 0 (ItiOTI) A6L) BUDGET BUDGET FUND DEFT ACCOUNT E DEBIT (DZC&EPEE). CREDIT „2Ooo OCl /o; 000 JO O1 „2L53 List B /0000Q 00 00 a000° 0011 rO oo U 00 O( jin, i ?St s 3000t) 100 00 200oo oa .,5-0 00o 00 O1 23/0 6220-$utie B 30004 00 00 15-3 oa 77,5'3 0o of 029/0 J ?gc-CEcc B 8voo 00 oot -6- 00 "No() po 01 ay/0 675 o B ,./00(..) 00 00 '{jr OC 0230C2 00 I O/ 1/5'0 JiYS- CELL B _2Z4 00 00 3,Z91U ad L/Qy90 00 of no_ 6220 B 7600 00 00 70(X0 00 /0004) 00 p1 3Y0o 41.20 B 3000 00 oct .6-0 00 30w1' 00 or 37uo 63ys' B ..7,ct6 00 oc /,7793) 00 /y2131 00 0/ 4q90 6350 B 070000 00 00 .42 56 y 00 3025z8 00 6I 690 owys% Gbfit a 37 a coo 00 00 13902_ oc /6902 0o 6/ 90Jo 6d/a B 3000 00 00 1362 od 57362. o0 0! 90x0 6_157) B S -O 000 00 oC fT oo c2 yo 00 u oo l of 94.1u 1350 -, TM B „Pyo ocio 00 OC ,21124 oc 36) yd2 00 of 90,0 635 4 -bit a 00 / 7S-000 OC P500 v od 11.25-00,- 00 01 9020 ,. vg< a 30 0na. 00 oS, 11767 fi 00 /014 0 60 Ca ¶00 G 75-0-006 B 00 /oo aft-) OC --Ilk-- ' , oc ≤3A a : 00 0 / /o/V .6_5-9S:' B -5-o-o1S 00 OC g3G196, 0 .Z3fly6 00 o/ /0/y 6//6 B oo Savo oc o 0o OJ /0/1 61/6 8 /5006 00 00 0 00 tot 2_ 6_j0 B So00 00 OC 0 00I /o/s' B doox, o0 oc 0 00 /oll B &s 0O 00 OC 0 00 /031 3 /0006 00 OC OC 00 / /09/ B. 7000 00 00 OC, \I/ /04 / B .25000 000 OC Total Previous ..00L 00 Total Increase be.L;• 19.(000„: Total New ( 00) . Total ,:•.: •1� Decrease.. t .; c. ( `O.0, : 00) Total- B 1419 REC 02366504 12/29/93 15:31 i0.-00 9/032 + 00'1{: # •,,.: F-1dA5'MLRY'LNTTWFTiTTRCTRTN-r71CDrr r. nonnman .... 'n'r RESOURCE FOR SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET APPROPRIATION PREVIOUS NEW BUDGET BUDGET 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 OQ 00 00 00 00 _00 Total Previous Total New Total 00 PAGE OF ACCOUNT CODE C BUDGET LEDGER FUND DEP'T ACCOUNT $ DECREASE INCREASE E DEBIT CREDIT !2i /62( GJJO B .300oo o0 00 O( 151 32'VO B 00 ,?41,000 00 01 7123 3g7U B 00 _.2coa 00 of U B000 00 .oo irEPORwnulir /90 135O B S B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0 00 00 0 0 Total Increas Total Decreas Total B 1419 REC 02366504 12/29/93 15:31 $0.00 10/032 F 1406 MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERIC & RECORDER WELD CO, CO 00 00 00 0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET APPROPRIATION DISBURSEMENTS 5h,h, t -b co JOURNAL ENTRY NUMBER Fund Name DATE lit EXPLANATION Fund Number PAGE 1 of Ordinance Number ACCOUNT CODE BUDGET LEDGER PREVIOUS NEW 0 (INCREASE) BUDGET BUDGET FUN DEP'T ACCOUNT E DEBIT (DECREASE) CREDIT 00 00 /1 3/31 4//0 B /COOO 30 00 000 301 .2/YO- B /OCtaQ 00 00 00 a0 .3ky/ B 30000 00 00 00 3/VC B /OOOfj o0 _00 00 00 00 31z/6 I B /0Wo po OS 00 00 280 B /37oo 00 oq od 00 W 3190 B /O0000 00 00 od oo /1 3/31_ /,?S0 -gp> B $Z>000 00 00 00 00 j J/yo dPZeZy B Vj000 00 0- 00 00 911/6 6 371 B 90000 00 oa 00 00 3/y/ 637/ B .10 000 00 0 00 00 3/%5 62-29 B avoo 00 0- od oo 3/yri G 360 B /oo0 00 0 00 00 3/yti 4?3 O B S00 0o 0 00 00 , lvi GyrL B /SZ)000 o0 0 i oda 00 V ph i 3(e 6 B /Coo 0 00 oc 09 00 1/ X140 6go7 B :7 wo 00 OC 100 134,7-42r B 02 boo OO oc 00 I _439746.22/ B 33000 00 OC °d 00 ° 6391-39; B /0000 00 00 0 00 1 6,31i2 B 3/,2:OO 0o oc 0 0o i 63f7- 73- B 00 00 00 �,r� Y d i ii B .,?coov 5'4/0000 00 00 0 00 V 3]Y6 1 7/ B 00 al 9co o0 OC 00 B 00 cis oc 00 r B 00 oc Total Previous 00 Total Increase 71e. zoo 00 4 Total New ( 00) Total Decrease ,t; (r qsd 00) Total B 1419 .. _ REC 02366504. . ..� , ., •i 12/29/93 15:31 ,-ran ., r . p:r tzi ,L�w_ „. > fi iii 71. N • q r 1.,.+n .,r .i,A, 00 . ,.. `� $0.00 11/032 Al ...-` Y 1407 ) ARY _ANW PEUERSTRTm rr.vnr . Dr. L4nnnr ....... TY 4N RESOURCE FOR SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET APPROPRIATION PAGE E OF / y EQ /(-✓ ACCOUNT CODE BUDGET LEDGER - FUND NAME PREVIOUS BUDGET NEW BUDGET FUND DEPT ACCOUNT C O DEBIT CREDIT /70 coo 00 370060 00 II boo 3230 B 00 7nopov 00 00 00 v 0001 3352- B 00 .*ooac> 00 00 00 6/ OW 1 335`a —Y B oo /3,00 00 00 00 /1 . £a1 3''/k B 00 ,737OOO 00 00 00 II 0061 3_‘4,2- B o0 A6600 00 00 00 /I 000 e 3710 -en B 00 `00S3O o0 00 00 /I coot 3912.- B 00 /O O0 O 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 00 8 00 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 00 a 00 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 00 8 00 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 00 8 00 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 00 8 00 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 00 R 00 00 00 00 8 00 00 00 00 8 00 00 00 00; B 00 00 00 001 B 00 OQ 00 00 B 00 00 OQ 00' B 00 00 Total Previous 00 Total Increase 0/7/8740 00 Total Decrease (/7/? 7D0 00) Total New ( IN Total --- 00 Total jI 00 B 1419 REC 02366504 12/29/93 15:31 $0.00 12/032 F 1408 MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERIC & RECORDER WELD CO, CO RESOURCE FOR SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET APPROPRIATION R4/ id PAGE OF ACCOUNT CODE BUDGET LEDGER FUND NAME" PREVIOUS BUDGET NEW BUDGET FUND DEFT ACCOUNT C 0 E DECREASE DEBIT ICREDITE CREDIT 00 00 !/ 5/ 9_ e3'7/ B 4/40000 00 00 00 00 00 1J 00 00 00 // 3/4/, 43 7/ B 00 a*OOQQ 00 00 00 7/ 3/4/U to 4/7/ B 20000ci 00 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 00 S 00 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 00, B OQ 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 00 B 00 00 Total Previous ,00 Total Increasea2c/Oxo 00 Total New ( 00) Total Decrease (02Wick 1) 00) / Total 00 Total — 00 B 1419 REC 02366504 12/29/93 15:31 ;0.00 13/032 F 1409 MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK & RECORDER WELD CO, CO SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET APPROPRIATION DISBURSEMENTS rn'10 iee 64 0 0 o a •? W 2 0 V M Ma CA z N I -I NF .-4 y a V 14 o Ina. kb e M N 0 N V W 0+ o .,.d sr v CO Cs. Sot/AL- 'aw/c& JOURNAL ENTRY NUMBER Fund Name /Z DATE ii- /7-43 EXPLANATION S✓/PLEHew7w- - /Qv3 Fund Number PAGE 1 of 1 ACCOUNT CODE BUDGET LEDGER Ordinance Number PREVIOUS BUDGET NEWS BUDGET DEFT ACCOUNT 0 D E (INCREASE) DEBIT (DECREASE) CREDIT /277 Soo 00 z,-7100 0O /2- g'57•- h735 B goo 000 00 OR R coo 00 /coo 00 /Z yajl. L,,,, RFC7 B 2 coo 00 00 4 nno 00 /k 000 00 /2 4/•03'1 " 0'”7 PS)/ B 7 000 00 00 754 000 00 S an/ylo0 00 / z .vyZz' 4370 R —Cc B ).,So7no 00 05 -1, 0n 74a OC ea^j 7q4 00 i2_ ./vio'' .'io B 00 /So eoa OR '120 •-i62- 0C; age>&IL2. 00 !, HMz5..'___ B 00 '74 &c.,5 OC 7 I c6" coo od c Lin,rt,no 00 /a __ '•4433 's+,o QEc B 00 75'1 0 6� Nit,' 00 57R »or7 O0 /x N�/4-( M_ f,,, B 00 000 75op4 0 73r{'+oo 00 r & o 000 X00 /2- ys/yp '- l. -fin a� � B 00 /oo O 00 00 /a yclal 3300 fs B 00 pop F 950 Ooo 00 00 00 /2 4Yal 6,716 es& B 9,50606 00 00 0(i CO B 00 0 00 00 B 00 0 00 00 B 00 0 00 00 B 00 0q 00 00 B 00 05 00 00 B 00 00 OC 00 B 00 OC 00 00 B 00 OC 00 00 B 00 CO 00 QO B 00 00 OC 00 B 00 00 00 00 B 00 00 OC 00 B 00 00 OC 00 B 00 OCk 00 00 B 00 OC Total Previous IS, 4475cy 00 Total Increase <15k o00 00 Total New ( IS, 4047, 54 ! 00) Total Decrease ( , ,Sit coo 00) 2 Total a 00 Total 0 00 SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET APPROPRIATION DISBURSEMENTS N M O TI 0 0 0 M C') In M o\ as N N oa 0 U, %o SD 0 O as -4 v CO Qy7 4.QALt/ f UY? JOURNAL ENTRY NUMBER Fund Name 5 DATE EXPLANATION Fund Number PAGE 1 of ACCOUNT CODE BUDGET LEDGER Ordinance Number PREVIOUS BUDGET NEW BUDGET FUND DEP'T ACCOUNT 2 E (INCREASE) DEBIT (DECREASE) CREDIT /f�0PP o cc /9 71-.20 Do I /S .29v3 /3So -15CR B -7,:r4;20 o0 0a% cYOo ° I 0 /Ire 7 00 ; / IP U /.$&g B / .2 I,e17 00 00 '/x127 oa -a— 00 l W /PO-I/NA B 00 2/ec27 00 0O 00 Oo b( „8"O o B PO //,7 j -?o 0 00 po B 00 00 00 00 B 00 00 od 00 B 00 00 00 00 B 00 00 OC 00 B 00 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 00 B o0 00 od 00 B 00 00 0 0c 00 B 00 00 • Oc. 00 B 00 0S OC 00 00 B 00 00 60 , B 00 00 0C 00 B 00 OC OC 00 B 00 0S 00 OC 001 B 00 OC 0o B o0 00 00 00 B 00 00 0c 00 8 00 00 l i •0C 00 B ' 00 00 i OC 00 i 00 OS OC • • OC 00 _ B 00 ; Total t Previous 00 Total Increase p/�/ /591 700 i Total ! New ( 00) .: ,- Total:— Decrease::' (77 00) i 'Total , r r •FC*' r •itt 7; ,,T t8l�yf ` as w^Y - 7. i, , S..Y. aJ <v' .. , .. J� • .-/ w�LL �. 'n' / {,�.sJ.yv.•yy��y��/�'}yW�w�(it � ^h�M/-µJ�S"Sf ll't'�.lTr—'lC te SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET APPROPRIATION DISBURSEMENTS NO fl 0 1.00 el C.) a a oW oa km 0 en M its 'r C4 ON Ca as z N N '"a w vD 0 W 64 b to N a 0 174 U K 01 N • Nr e t el CO CI4 77`x'47 / TA JOURNAL ENTRY NUMBER Fund Name ` / DATE EXPLANATION Fund Number PAGE 1 of ACCOUNT CODE BUDGET LEDGER Ordinance Number PREVIOUS BUDGET NEW BUDGET FUND DEFT ACCOUNT C 0 E (INCREASE) DEBIT — (DECREASE) CREDIT 00++ 011 ho /9 oOpt...f0© B ; ., ,.. po /24 /oO oo, oat /9 may& 6 222 B 53-000 00 00 00 ba fy z//7n 6229 B /O cod) o0 00 0Q• 00 /, goo 4376 B 5Ooo 00 00 OCR 00 j y 4x76 49b B ao 000 00 00 00 00 , /9 WO G 35-4 B .� 0000 00 00 od oo ; 62/ Z B '2 Ono 00 00 OC 00 6,2Z0 B ; ?0,000 oo. 00 00 00 6342 B_ too oo OC 00 B 00 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 00 B 00 00 OC 00 B 00 OC Oq 00 B 00 OC 00 00 B 00 OC 00 00 B 00 OC 00 00 B 00 OC 00 00 B 00 OC od 00 B 00 OC 0C1 00 B 00 CO od 001 B 00 0C OC 00 B 00 00 OC 00 B 00 00 Oc 00 B 00 00 od 00 a 00 et OC oc 00 B 00 Total Previous 00 Total Increase 00 Total New ( 00) i Total 'Decrease 7. ( , . + 00) ,_ 't Total .. i�.i 'riPN1 }fM1 L .\ !`�` T::F l r I S ^(iI . Total } M1(1"� r yNr� �14Cj \ ,4•-.,x1.3 .-.4... yM1- lc, RESOURCE FOR SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET APPROPRIATION PACE OF ACCOUNT CODE BUDGET LEDGER - FUND NAME PREVIOUS BUDGET NEW BUDGET FUND DEPT ACCOUNT C D E DECREASE DEBIT INCREASE CREDIT //7z$1U oo /p76M)oo /9 000► 337/ 8 /bO000 00 00 00 00 / } re.) 13y° B 00 f& o oo 00 00 Pi Y176 _636 U B 6t)OU o0 00 00 00 r9 Y17o 39,Sb-:5 '= s Do “thoot 00 - 00 - 00 -; - .39577-P B 00 /O Go O 00 00 00 346740 B 00 , Too o 00 00 00 3q4PW ,C B 00 3 00 0 00 00 00 flOW 2 B 00 &OO 00 00 00 30?.(,aep2E B 00 S5'oo 00 00 00 / jy/j B 00 02000 00 00 00 k V ?y/?-saU B 00 7000 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 00 n 00 00 00 00 R 00 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 00 8 00 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 00 8 00 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 00 B 00 00 no 00 ,,E OQ r 00 00 B 00 00 ♦OD 00, 00 B 00 00 Total Previous 00 Total Increase 00 Total New ( 00, Total Decrease ( 00) Tot -al CO Total 00. B 1419 REC 02366504 12/29/93 15:31 $0.00 17/032 F 1413 MARY ANN FEIIERSTEIN CLERK & RECORDER WELD CO, CO SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET APPROPRIATION DISBURSEMENTS N 0 M U 0 00 .+ u o 0 ox 0 a • 40 arf • Pa Ma O+ • z • 1,63 N a Da in ad iso enZ M �7 0 U w ON .r • M .ti CO 44 (77.02G/#ti.i JOURNAL ENTRY NUMBER Fund Name OAS IJ .7 / / 9 /1 EXPLANATION CVdttenti, t 4 t tttncid E'n.4341 .OJ. Fund Number PACE 1. of Ordinance Number ACCOUNT CODE BUDGET LEDGER PREVIOUS BUDGET NEW BUDGET FUND DEFT ACCOUNT D E (INCREASE) DEBIT (DECREASE) CREDIT o. •01 /f' 456 /v//l1 B eel/WV 'o OR 0. .0 //1,5 B y/oq' .0 00 0' '0 J 641'l0 B �a no '0 00 0 ' . 0 // �� to 9SO B .5/ 9/3 .0 0 0' .0 //m) ABC/ B 4a8v 0 OS 0. .0 N s. -�;4Q-33 4-Ni ' , _. „. ----4417no onq 0' '0 B .. 00` 0i '0 B .0 00 0. .O B ,0 1� � o ll alli R I A J R Ial Joi a a o 0 0 0 0 0 0' .0l B 00 0. .Ol B 0 0. a0l B .0 0. ool B 00 0. 00 B 00 0. 00 B 00 0• 00 B 00 0• 00 B 00 0• 00 B 00 0 00 B 00 00 B 00 •• .01 B 00 0. 00l B 00 0' ool 5 00 0 00l B 00 0 001 B 00 0' oo l B 00 Total Previous 00 Total Increase Total New ( 00) Total Decrease i { C Total 00 Total SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET APPROPRIATION DISBURSE4ENTS rl .. ▪ y N ri en av Ch N C7 NF H [Q z d Le) CL4 o lt7 %0 \O¢ M az N 0 >4 14 a Oi N N N vv el PI mw Fund Name /9 Fund Number Ordinance Number PREVIOUS NEW BUDGET BUDGET Total Previous Total New Total 0. '0 00 00) 00 0 JOURNAL ENTRY DATE EXPLANATION /9 /9 a_0/93 ACCOUNT CODE ACCOUNT /Go en.. H fact BUDGET LEDGER 0 (INCREASE) E DEBIT B Total Increase Total Decrease n0 Total 3D /Da 0 0 (DECREASE) CREDIT 0 Jo /Ps 00 ago, aoa kit lea- 0" 0- 0 OC 00 CC 00 00 00 00 0 0 NOV-23-93 TUE 13:11 WELD CO NRD FAX N0. 3033583975 / 9 3 SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET APPROPRIATION DISBURSEMENTS SNpp 02/ /Dn PACE OP je�a NOV-23-93 TUE 13:12 WELD CO IRO FAX NO. 3033583975 expl blemC SUPPIENENTAL BUDGET APPROPRIATION DISBURSEMENTS P. 03 GO W strant,✓ 11. wirwirmai a 11 11 „ /s9zae ,a. /tae 141 , 11. �� '/ / % I ,/� 11 . 1 • � � . I � I 1 inuons Erni Ella Ilialillinlirr� a 11all Mar MEW /I Me 11 , FUND NAME `� PREVIOUS BUDGET NEW BUDGET ,ten; .,�11' Rinviarr rmia /, 00 00 00 /PAGE. OF FUND 21 ACCOUNT CODS DEPT ACCOUNT BUDGET LEDGER INCREASE DEBIT EMI m met/. DECREASE CREDIT I:r U 1AM gar a Mar 1 / lie/ �a winanamma1j1 ~n te 11 «sannre 1111 /... ,err,► ;;�""'.1 Nanw yr _ i; ' e , 11 1. 11 ems./,a rmawm.11ffiram�,I! Ill El11 ©a 11 i _ /C/ 00 rznarmiewerra e�■r�1a��., 1. nranbe 1 1 s. 00 00 .6 be IMMIIIR 4 WAN rnall11 all, III e� 11 , ••r.P !:' •:r.e....11,IN.,, 'soh 7/9,693 /, 9a3,1vj 44, 1.0V 23 '93 12:24 ell a • 00 00 00 00 C0 OD 00 00 00 00 1, pap a9'jgd �39g 3033563975 PAGE.003 SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET APPROPRIATION DISBURSEMENTS 64,x, f - O N M O N O 44 0 0 o n: w W 0 U .. o\ U x N M W NCB ~H a v v el el c ib YJ .So L r b ',1 Q.. u JOURNAL ENTRY NUMBER Fund Name DATE ...` 7 EXPLANATION Fund Number PAGE 1 0£ Ordinance Number ACCOUNT CODE BUDGET LEDGER PREVIOUS BUDGET NEW BUDGET FUND DEP'T ACCOUNT D E (INCREASE) DEBIT (DECREASE) CREDIT 00 b o72 zO0j I y8 / B 100 7Soct. 00 OC 00 •2 o 4950 zGtB 027 ?oo goo og 00 .00 6/352) 1 ittdB 330 00 00 00 00 I . I 179(-- B ,.Q r //,2 00 00 0c 00 VlI �! / Ag2p-S}(41 B 339 q9/ 00 OS 00 0q oo 02,2 0,220 61% zi B 00 70 pop od 00 021 2cYo 6/10 B 3-006 00 , 00 Od 00 22 fsyo 1393 B c7,5-000 00 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 00 B 00 OR 00 00 00 B 00 OR 00 B 00 00 od 00 B 00 00 OC 00 B 00 Or, 00 oc bo . B 00 OC, 00 B 00 OC OC 00 B 00 OC 00 00 B 00 00 OC 00 B 00 00 OC 00 B 00 00 00 00 B 00 00 I 00 00 B 00 00 00 00 B 00 OC1 0C OC 00 B 00 Total Previous 00 Total Increase ,547/5-000 o00 • 00 Total New ( 00) : Total Decrease T.(.� V Totalµ, y Total cri'v mastw =it:, .4`rwi 1Baru.l aa • ��r G7g.. r rr it! 5��f��a�jy: 0 No M O N U 0 o O o x 44. 14 O 4.1 ri m M •a an M Oi U a Z ▪ tel N F • [Q ✓ b ow Y1 Cv eo z M ZC N O U mrn P .4 el e p el el SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET APPROPRIATION DISBURSEMENTS Fund Namit 4 2 Z. - Fund Number. Ordinance Number PREVIOUS NEW BUDGET BUDGET 4° 0 0 0. .0 0. p 0. .0 o. .0 0. .n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Previous 00 Total New ( 00) Total 00 JOURNAL ENTRY NUMBER DATE EXPLANATION PAGE 1 of ACCOUNT CODE FUND DEP'TI ACCOUNT Az coo( 3 yj/ Gy2O /Mai C 0 D E B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B 00 BUDGET LEDGER (INCREASE) DEBIT QOUOU Total Increase Total Decrease Total 00 00 00 00 100 00 00 (DECREASE) CREDIT 6oao� 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 aeo ( o- 0000 00� joo 00 00 00t 0 00 00 OCR 00 00 OS 00 OC O5 OC OC OC OS 00 00 00 00 00 Co OC RESOURCE FOR SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET APPROPRIATION / PAGE OF ACCOUNT CODE BUDGET LEDGER - 6L }i . / A PREVIOUS BUDGET NEW BUDGET ` IFUNI) DEP'T ACCOUNT C E DECREASE DEBIT INCREASE CREDIT ,6— 00{1/,02)0 >0, .r ceSdf 33.0--416 B oo y'C00 00 —C-- oo i#OpO oo ar 9Ce7 d3,67-4.0 6, B /coo 00 00 0 00 00 00 00 B 8 00 00 00 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 CO 8 00 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 00 8 00 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 00 8 00 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 00 8 00 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 00 00 B 00 00 00, 9 00 00 o0 00 a 00 00 Total Previous '7 00 Total Increase 4/ Oa / 00 Total Decrease (4, 6040 00 00) Total New ( 00) Total YV Total 00 8 1419 REC 02366504 12/29/93 15:31 $0.00 24/032 F 1420 MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK & RECORDER WELD CO, CO BUDGET LINE ACCOUNT CHANCE FORM 4'3 2 O V w �x w Ma al o' z N N N E1 a O u� 'o eZ m N 'O PREVIOUS BUDGET 00 00 NEW BUDGET , 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0C 00 00 OC 00 0C 00 00 00 00 OC 00 00 00 Total Previous Total New Total ( 00 00 00 '00 00 00 JOURNAL ENTRY NUMBER DATE EXPLANATION: Budget Adjustment ACCOUNT CODE -C FUND DEPT ACCOUNT 0 n F a5 ° ° Alp NRa3 B 62144 (143 414 014/0 µ7 B B B B BUDGET LEDGER (INCREASE) (DECREASE) DEBIT CREDIT 00 00 00 50 00 00 /0_0 00 B Q 00 B 00 B 00 B 00 B 00 4560 �0 0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0 0 DEPARTMENT HEAD APPROVAL: COMPTROLLER APPROVAL: ax rn FINANCE DIRECTOR APPROVAL: .+N nitV H H 0104 COMMISSIONER APPROVAL: 1. 2. 3. --"" White - Central Accounting Canary - Department B B B B B 13 B B 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 B 00 Total Increase i'otal Decrease Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 •0 L-'5OO '0 ( /500 '0) 0 '0 1993 BUDGET REVISION WELD COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY ACCOUNT NUMBER 25-9057-3310 25-9057-6110 25-9057-6143 25-9057-6144 25-9057-6146 25-9057-6147 25-9057-6210 25-9057-6311 25-9057-6335 25-9057-6345 25-9057-6370 25-9057-6530 1993 1993 BUDGET REVISION DIFFERENCE beu‘k C<e�, $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 ($14,464.33) $8,736.79 $872.80 $588.18 $543.10 $137.55 $115.59 $214.19 $135.00 $710.23 $1,519.50 $891.40 $14,464.33 $8,736.79 $872.80 $588.18 $543.10 $137.55 $115.59 $214.19 $135.00 $710.23 $1,519.50 $891.40 B 1419 REC 02366504 12/29/93 15:31 $0.00 26/032 F 1422 MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK & RECORDER WELD CO, CO 3.737.00 873.00 588.00 543.00 138.00 l t to.00 135.06 710.,00 /519.00 011.60 56961 56.. 301 SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET APPROPRIATION DISBURSEMENTS 524/L/1 - cm O en U 0 NV it m rI 01 O. P IA 10 Sb en N 0 U CC CC Cr. .ti " 0I awc JOURNAL ENTRY NUMBER Pund Name DATE 3g EXPLANATION Fund Number PAGE 1 of ACCOUNT CODE BUDGET LEDGER Ordinance Number PREVIOUS BUDGET NEW BUDGET FUND DEFT ACCOUNT D E (INCREASE) DEBIT (DECREASE) CREDIT C.) 00 000 DO 39 0000 9190-00/6 B 00 637oot oo 0 oo _‘CO y93'G oo 13y OooJ 37yf -t0sz B oo _70 00O 00 0 00 J-y37o oo ,3y oob► .Jyo-PRYt B 00 fy370 00 .-Cr o0 /00 coo 00 3c/ j9:9 /3SU B /V00040_100 00 61.7 96 oc 00 ' ./ 1 9.20 ZRJL B /91I37U po 00, oc oo / �a -CM- B oo ,io oov Oq od 00 V . ja92o- mut& B 00 yp 000 00 00 00 31/ 0071 ?Poo B 00 x00000 00 0C 00 66,20 Ditel B /) OO O 00 OC OC 00 /,¢,20-3'(j') B (/OOOO 00 OCk oC 00 69.0 -LIB , B '70000 00 OC 00, 00 / 10.9„20 z B Y0 00 0 00 OC od 00 i -SI) B Svc' 0 00 00 Opt 00 11.20 B 00 OC od 00I B 00 00 OC 00 B 00 OC 00 00 • B 00 0C OC 00 B 00 0C a. 0C 00 B 00 oc, v I od 00 B 00 00 F 0 00 B 00 0C E4 H 0*I 00 B 00 OC z 00 00 B 00 00 m OC 00 B 00 00 4. 00 00 B 00 0 ; E 0 �. 00 B 00 OC Total Previous 00 Total Increase z p2/4 9376 00 . . . r_ +i ct N Total mr New ( 00) ..'Decrease Total ,.,,.. - .. ; :: e q•.]/,�%" (d!•,16,1) .� 1°7° ♦N 771194, l•`L . 00:. r " .w Jr h M1 t,4, f Yt"1 lut '�mam'�'.xa ;_`'4` ." ' N�� .* et r�n,`f 4 SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET APPROPRIATION DISBURSEMENTS ` 11,41 iq ial/CQ •r JOURNAL ENTRY NUMBER DATE FFund ame (p EXPLANATION PAGE 1 of Fund Number ACCOUNT CODE BUDGET LEDGER Ordinance Number PREVIOUS BUDGET NEW BUDGET ND ! DEP'TI ACCOUNT L O E (INCREASE) DEBIT (DECREASE) CREDIT 6%S06O 00 c/c000 bo JO 1/a G/1 a is Z270 00O 00 00 SC7o0 00 FX700 00 L220 5 10000 00 00 4ggy_ oc_ /('y9y 00 .3 G 3 /0600 00 00 cerfPgena 00 -Cr 00 B 00 f Alma. 00 OC -&--- 00 • 3yl$=T12Cz.. B .2.2YJ4 0 00a 00 4,.7.,24//an -6— ix 610 A0 /0 3W.). 9 B 00 ovitv/, o o0 od 49q0/ 00 B 00 00 od 00 B 00 00 > J 00 0o I B 00 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 00 • B 00 00 1 oq 00 B 00 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 00 3 00 00 od 00 B 00 0q ! 00 00 B 00 OC 00 00 B 00 OC OC 00 B 00 OC OC 00 B 00 OS, OC 00 B 00 00 OS 00 B 00 00 ! OC 00 B 00 00 OC 00 B 00 00 OC 00 B 00 00 OC 00 B 00 00 OC OO B 00_ OC Total Previous 00 Total Increase �/ a2 d/6 o 00 Total .; "Decrease :•:. ,• i�7i1�1¢ oo) Total New ( 00) „natt Vyf .f I.M J • ']TOtBI7��L� ["M�.., xtN7mt,wAZ} .::g&rat J -•,Y. :y.1!ti'1y rnt �y �'i A 'f :Ma a; : aY .S �F. --. �' Total:. 'r::c OD',777,•+"-z L <,• jr 1.444.71,-;:",;Jti..• ., ` SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET APPROPRIATION DISBURSEMENTS j /17C JOURNAL ENTRY NUMBER fit? nd// Name DATE 4 3 EXPLANATION Fund Number PAGE 1 of ACCOUNT CODE BUDGET LEDGER Ordinance Number PREVIOUS ' BUDGET NEW BUDGET !FUND DEP'T ACCOUNT 0 D E (INCREASE) DEBIT (DECREASE) CREDIT 00 Do I 4,3 coot ;7a0 B 0 30000 00 ad 00 6 3 90.20 6790 -De:NT a Jo boo o 00 00 .00 B o 00 00 00 B 00 00 OC 00 B 00 OS 00 00 B 00 OS 00 00 B 00 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 00 B 00 00 > 00 00 B 00 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 00 B 00 00 1 00 00 B 00 00 ' OSB 001 o0 oc j 0d 00 B 00 00 od 00 B 00 00 5 00 Oo B 00 00 - OC 00 B 00 00 OC 00 B 00 OC 00 00 B 00 00 a od 00 B 00 OC 4 OC 00 B 00 00 a OC 00 8 00 00 i 00 00 B 00 00 a a 0C 00 8 00 co OC 00 B 00 OC Total Previous 00 Total Increase 34000 00 S a Total New C 00) .: Total ;c -• Decrease , (4.37);;;,:„.r� 00) 77 r 4 Y Total.. .. .. .• G0 mz , Y IJ 'I r} ty �Fe i . .Total ?'way.y� ,� 14.-/ lJ. * J W �( . 0 074 tJ 1 M { SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET APPROPRIATION DISBURSEMENTS N m u 0 0 M 0 O O .� o 0 v a- M In W Ma • V a2 N M N ••••1 e rn N ON 0w in 6. '0 0 en M RT N N O 4 z a a+ w N V C CO %4 e_ k if( in 0 O JOURNAL ENTRY NUMBER N DATE ��Fund IP ( EXPLANATION Fund Number PAGE 1 of ' Ordinance Number ACCOUNT CODE BUDGET LEDGER PREVIOUS BUDGET NEW BUDGET FUND DEP'T ACCOUNT O (INCREASE) D DEBIT (DECREASE) CREDIT 001jj( Oo pp (O y //5� / ? 6 y2o B ,3-000 30 0 I0 00 '0PS B 000 00 0 00 oo_6y cool 3'/- B o0 1tSo00 0 od o B 00 0 OC OY B 00 0 00 0 B 00 0 od 0 B 00 0 00 too B 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 B 00 0 Od 00 B 00 0 00 00 B 00 0 pd 00 B 00 0 OC 00 B 00 0 00 60 B 00 0 00 00 B 00 0 OC 00 B 00 0 00 00 B 00 0C 00 B 00 OC 00 B 00 OC 00 B 00 OC 00 B 00 OC 00 B 00 OC 00 B 00 Total Previous 00 Total Increase S.5,40CC5 oo Total New ( 00) Total Decrease �''• « (. oer,: 00 Tot81 A.Y, . 00 me _ ti k ) •t'f x ,r ..g t,..> ..A Total ,.r?,r a J A v vE ry S 1416.E r,G• pip( : j a SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET APPROPRIATION DISBURSEMENTS N 0 m 0 0 0 44 .d m In ti 01 O' N N H Sr -VC— JOURNAL ENTRY NUMBER F d Name DATE %p S EXPLANATION Fund Number PAGE 1 of ACCOUNT CODE BUDGET LEDGER Ordinance Number PREVIOUS BUDGET NEW BUDGET FUND DEPT ACCOUNT C 0 E (INCREASE) DEBIT (DECREASE) CREDIT 0 0 4S //9/ U 3ry B 33333'f • o 00 o. o -Se a'o ?we B •0 333 339 00 a. o B •0 00 0. •0 B •0 00 0. .0 B .0 00 o. .0 B 'a OS O. ,0 B '0 00 00 .0 B •0 00 00 00 B •0 00 00 •0 B 00 00 ) 00 •0 B '0 00 00 00 B .0 0C 3 00 00 B 00 00 0°� 00 B 00 Oa Od 00 B 00 00 G a 00 00 B 00 OC 00 00 . B 00 00 Od 00 B 00 00 G 0 00 B 00 OC` n 0 00 B 00 00 a 0 00 S 00 00 od 00 B 00 00 -4 OC 00 B 00 00 b OC 00 B 00 00 Y 4 0C 00 B 00 OCR N4 0C 00 B 00 00 y Total Previous 00 Total Increase 333317 00 ..• .` >4 iTotal s New ( 00) Total / -:.c. Decrease i 3; •00) . - Total.` -A. �. 00 - T ' r. . w TotalrS�.�..isi4 ,y' 9h°lwWtt.. �. /. Cii a ,re .G ...r.. .. T' r:fftdy�,y� l jJ�{��+.rM l+g1/4V. A M .. ♦ ..• . �tipE51'�I�i`F� �:�lirlk y i SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET APPROPRIATION DISBURSEMENTS L 1711 t' 13 A JOURNAL ENTRY NUMBER Fund Name m / ✓ DATE EXPLANATION Fund Number PACE ) of ACCOUNT CODE BUDGET LEDGER Ordinance Number PREVIOUS BUDGET NEW BUDGET YND P DEPT ACCOUNT 0 E (INCREASE) DEBIT (DECREASE) CREDIT ol7lq/ oo 5%?/oyl oo 67 1192- 4,7/6 B /57006 0 oq `{T oo ;70c)c) 00 B 7006 0 00 00 4000 00 46.z/L 4_23-0 B .OOU 0 00 /x'79°G oa .7906 oo / 4o?9c1oct B , coa>o 0 OR 7700 oc /37700 00 \j 4si%Q B a 000 0 OR oq /1S-000 oo 47 //V 39!V B 0 /431OOO oo od 00 B 0 oc od 00 _ B 0 00c 00 00 B 0 00 '6504 12/29/93 15:31 $0.00 32/03' FWUFRSTEIN CLERIC & RECORDER WELD CO, CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o_o- O_ n n n nn 0 00 0-_0 0 0 0 0 00 B 0 00 00 B 0 00 00 B o oo 00 B 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 B 00 OC 00 B 00 OC 00 • B 00 OC 00 B 00 OC 00 B 00 OC 00 B 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 B 00 00 00 B 00 oq 00 B 00 OC 00 Total Increase /3?v6(> 00 Total Decrease-,;.:;- :. ( taQUU . 09)‘; ( 00) , A 00 ti U''fiMM1n.�. ... V.I, nit. .. iyA ..'A O':f It w WE A., $00at ». NOW THU& B. ^4.114.11, vi<CAttvegaltillSr rrodaa,armadas fl theloatdof,County Caput)? EN M ilainr ha Arid fear . lamb„ ++ the osvonanto bodf'et Couty. arty spending agency; Calm NC .1 ied.ainsiMa!MLatta sew , nc bY.-1hfiatm ant amok crane than the local H. aeadaittlie :RWI.",OISO' AFFEDAVTT OF PLtLICATION STATE OF COLORADO COUNTY OF WELD SS _ I, KEITH HANSEN, of said County of Weld, being duly sworn, say that I am publisher of WINDSOR BEACON a weekly newspaper having a general circulation in said County and State, published in the town of WZ''DSOR, in said County and State; and that the notice, of which the annexed is a true copy, has been published in said week y for_,_ successive weeks, that the notice AIVNUyNIO°." Ai. was published in the regular and enure issue of every ,itt number of the paper during the period and time of " publication, and in the newspaper proper and not in a supplement, and that the first publication of said notice was in said paper bearing the date of the day of 4'p---0 AD., 19 fl and +a, tie 'w the last publication bearing the date of the ''fool, jerelnmha•setkfslNa Nmaa.rn#eed,freyMYehedt eimpetAteedi,raa. ^ that the said WL''iDSOR BEACON has been published Itl�NKa�:rondo q...Itt aiseic ioamis'1s, continuously and uninterruptedly for the period of 5 timnagsanniestrz, 4k consecutive weeks, in said County and State, prior to the ►e►IMaed� iirIOW ', date of first publication of said notice, and the same is a 1ti1sa es... newspaper within the meaning of an Act to regulate printing of legal notices an advertisements, approved May 18, 1931, and all prior as in force. rte. ;,eutherlee,y ,. ••..^^An"CensenN ..a^igaW,•1L1a#.•-•. Sub of day of , AD., 19_ and LUSHER to before me this ` /teiifir day 19 113 NOTARY PUBLIC My commission expires .2-g9lo aroew1'el.Wil�•ril u _.. ..'ells. sselellsY intakes omit • e knits n yeartI ersoffilse Mod Sal • omega :Mrlrat111e Aeldl" elk nMew .,eMlesr>.at �aleyy�lIN rull/ atworoYtWomb �yyy Y a iy ••'t-4 .0e "1:••OII0AINEC, by, The la ear 4 Jectw d. & *4 ,Leme✓t;aswilept� fuNd,• a •: - Fund, Aerie bawler Sark Sae tilnlosre�e *Sot ..sat e4�se� alldWeer:lala; a; AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF COLORADO COUNTY OF WELD I, KEITH HANSEN, of said County of Weld, being duly sworn, say that I am publisher of WINDSOR BEACON a weekly newspaper having a general circulation in said County and State, published in the town of WINDSOR, in said County and State; and that the notice, of which the annexed is a true copy. has been published in said weekly for_L _successive weeks, that the notice was published in the regular and entire issue of every number of the paper during the period and time of publication, and in the newspaper proper and not in a supplant, and that the fret publication of said notice was in said paper bearing the data of the die_fday of A.D.. 19 a and the last publication bearing the date of the day of A.D., 19� and that the said WINDSOR BEACON has been published continuously and uninterruptedly for the period of b consecutive weeks, in said County and State, prior to the date of $rst publication of said notice, and the same is a newspaper within' the meaning of an Act to regulate printing of legal notices an• advertisements, approved May 18, 1931, and all prior . . as in force. as Pe :USHER d and sworn to before me thin-!° * _day _, _ NOT PUBLIC MY commission expires4:14,04,a... ,a..� AR23h6506 EMERGENCY ORDNANCE NO. 177 IN THE MATTER OF THE ANNUAL APPROPRIATION FOR WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, FOR FISCAL YEAR 1994 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY. COLORADO: That it is necessary to set the annual appropriation for Weld County, Colorado for Fiscal Year 1994, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County. Colorado adopted the annual budget in accordance with the Local Government Budget Law, on December 9, 1993, and WHEREAS, in compliance with Section 3-8 of the Weld County Home Rule Charter for Weld County, Colorado, which provides that the Board of County Commissioners shall act only by ordinance in matters of contracts, and inasmuch as this Appropriation Ordinance provides for authority to expend or contract to expend or to enter into any contract which, by its terms, involves the expenditure of money for any purpose recited in this Appropriation Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners in and for the County of Weld, State of Colorado, that all monies received from the sources and for the purposes named in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as a part of this Ordinance be, and hereby are, appropriated for the County's operations for said Fiscal Year, commencing January 1, 1994, as estimated at this time to be, and which will become, available during the year, 1994. BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED by the Board that an emergency exists inasmuch as State law requires that the budget Ordinance of Weld County, Colorado, be enacted on or before the 31st day of December. 1993; therefore, this Ordinance is declared to be an Emergency Ordinance under the provisions of Section 3-14 of the Weld County Home Rule Charter. B 1419 REC 02366506 12/29/93 15:31 $0.00 1/003 F 1431 MARY ANN F£UERSTEIN CLERK & RECORDER WELD CO, CO ORD #177 o'QD/'77 ATTEST: RE: ORDINANCE NO. 177 Page 2 The above and foregoing Ordinance No. 177 was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 9th day of December, A.D., 1993. /4/ a / Weld County Clerk to the Board BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WE % COUNTY, COLORADO arbara J. Kirkme Read and Approved: December 9, 1993 Published in the Windsor Beacon: December 16, 1993 Effective: December 9, 1993 B 1419 REC 02366506 12/29/93 15:31 $0.00 2/003 F 1432 MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK & RECORDER WELD CO, CO ORD #177 w U a .. O M x x a EXHIBIT "A" 1 9 9 4 BUDGET ASSESSED PALMATION: $1,107,555,670 F P22 E 8 N 6. $.0 0 6 E§ o R Sib ? S 8 2S H 25 2 r ZS 2S a ii c,2 Z2 9 r 2 N N (r qF. P O p FF Kya N' N r el mm 88 88 88 .noa OO �pvO N P N O V F W 10 , N “Na 8 O O by N• N b N n 0P ~ p i V a as =0n N r N N N N o O N w. NO M .] V N (((�(((JJJJJJ P 2 h O t' 569' en •8 8 QQ N O N o N V V o N Y n- 8 II N /1 00N0 N m �D 0 0 W r N -- N n o O O N g N V01 p U W r a m 0 ..n Np + P O n V---0. Y m V r N w N N N C O 6'. 6,464,994 $81,294,444 Q< r yy g P '1 0 N o I Of 0 O 0 0! ^ 0 W ti P 0 M pw - M v 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o N gg M1 b a n n gn o ,G8'(O N V $ N r $ N — A-�..w V- N- N N 2O O w f+ yY w( N g N N N N Y X O O N N O n Y 1 P + N N -- .0 W^ .• •n O 8 r P a 8 P N a cocoa a 8. P N N N +50 o .0 a N a .poi—$000 n n N r $ 0 -. N.. o r N obo&o o w m n w Y w T 14.154 8 88 cc O cc O N N O O O O8 n 8 O O P N 8 O d P H 8888 8 0 3 O O O O • O V V N V .. WVm tl Y a 8 8 [�� p� p� pO O pO Oi 8 N M O O F. O r Oj p� O n •• 0 a O 0 V g g 4 gp g 1 8 N /1 g V S Y a FE r , .rn P 8 8888 P a O P O O O O N00+0000 N 0 O N « 8 O O 4 N §§§R§ O O O " O Y r ��. ti P 2 w z $ N+ . a q rm$&285a rm o V N c b N M N mw - oo •1 1 P a N .O I P N W O N N N 1 a.2:". 9 fi v r C 0 — o • V n A q Q • o Z SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS: Road & Bridge Social Services Conservation Trust Contingent .Emergency Reserve Health Department Human Resources Solid Waste CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS: Capital Expenditures ENTERPRISE FUNDS: Ambulance o V W 1 WW E �z INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS: Motor Pool (Operating) Health Insurance Printing & Supply Insurance Phone Service NET TOTALS - PROP. FUNDS CROSS TOTALS ALL FUNDS - r h +- w r .Nv r N N .D c .No ...0 0 B 1419 REC 02366506 12/29/93 15:31 $0.00 3/003 F 1433 MARY ANN FEUERSTEXN CLERK & RECORDER WELD CO, CO Sae "CM<' amity ONSMIatOttpavot meta afIt°MOO: cougty, Itatniaserisatt ��, ste_ a la•rt_Lisume yaw asuirtimmistii tool Olveloolitt_ *NW . s Li%on trees tip, l+w°n'M tin ar„ meslifeellikinoihr AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF COLORADO COUNTY OF WELD SS I, KEITH HANSEN, of said County of Weld, being duly sworn, say that I am publisher of WINDSOR BEACON a weekly newspaper having a general circulation in said County and State, published in the town of WINDSOR, in said County and State; and that the notice, of which the annexed r a Ave copy, has been published in said weekly fort _successive weeks, that the notice was published in the regular and entire issue of every number of the paper during the period and time of publication, and in the newspaper proper and not in a supplement, and that the first publication of said notice was in said paper bearing the date of the • /6 day of t tec Zw. , A.D., 190_,and the last publication bearing the date of the day of A.D., 19_ and that the said WINDSOR BEACON has been published continuously and uninterruptedly for the period of 5 consecutive weeks, in said County and State, prior to the date of first publication of said notice, and the same is a newspaper within' the meaning of an Act to regulate printing of legal notices an advertisements, approved May 18, 1931, and all prior cca�e'fpr as in force. USHER STthee 3�d and sworn to before e this 4fltday of ,,[(J�i&cen.�K 19 �f'z NOTAR /7I-iner--nryt[ My commission expires i' ' S. AR234.650S EMERGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 178 IN THE MATTER OF SETTING THE MILL LEVY FOR THE ANNUAL APPROPRIATION FOR WELD COUNTY. COLORADO. FOR FISCAL YEAR 1994 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 0;7 WELD COUNTY, COLORADO: That it is necessary, by Colorado statutes and by the Home Rule Charter of Weld County. Colorado, to set the annual mill levy for the annual appropriation for Weld County Colorado for Fiscal Year 1994, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County. Colorado, adopted the annual budget in accordance with the Local Government Budget Law, on December 9, 1993, and WHEREAS, the amount of money necessary to balance the budget for the County funds is as follows: FUND County General Fund Road and Bridge Fund Social Service Fund Contingent Fund IGS - Insurance Fund Capital Expenditures Emergency Revenue AMOUNT $15,897,618 3,123,749 2,579,537 1,719.573 551,905 600,000 400.000 124,872 82 WHEREAS, the 1993 valuation for assessment for the County of Weld as certified by the County Assessor is $1,107,555,870 for Budget Year 1994. NOW. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners in and for the County of Weld, State of Colorado, that for the purpose of meeting all legal expenses under Section 29-1-301 through 29-1-305, CRS, as amended, and Section 14-7 of the Weld County Home Rule Charter, there is hereby levied the following mills upon each dollar of the total valuation for assessment of all taxable property within the County for Fiscal Year 1994: FUND MILLS REVENUE County General Fund 14.354 $15,897,618 Road and Bridge Fund 2.820 3,123,749 Social Service Fund 2.329 2,579,537 Contingent Fund 1.553 1,719,573 IGS- Insurance Fund .498 551,905 Capital Expenditures .542 600,000 Emergency Reserve .361 400,000 22.457 $24,872,382 ORD #178 B 1419 REC 02366505 12/29/93 15:31 $0.00 1/002 F 1429 MARY ANN FEOERSTEIN CLERK & RECORDER WELD CO, CO 1St O9 RE: ORDINANCE NO. 178 Page 2 BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED by the Board that the County Assessor and the County Treasurer of Weld County, Colorado, be, and hereby are, authorized and directed to make such entries upon their books, at such time or times as will be necessary to make this Mill Levy Ordinance for the annual appropriation for Weld County, Colorado, for Fiscal Year 1994, effective. BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED by the Board that an emergency exists inasmuch as State law requires that the mill levy of Weld County, Colorado, be enacted on or before the 15th day of December, 1993, therefore, this Ordinance is declared to be an Emergency Ordinance under the provisions of Section 3-14 of the Weld County Home Rule Charter. The above and foregoing Ordinance No. 178 was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 9th day of December, A.D., 1993. ATTEST: /aid% Weld County Clerk to the Board BY: Deputy::,C the Boar APPROVERS)167-90 : County Atto ey BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WECOUNTY, COLORADO Constance L. H befit; Chairman ' l/ Webs er, P Teemm Geoxftec>E. Baxter Dale K. Hall Barbara 3. Kirkm er Read and Approved: December 9, 1993 Published in the Windsor Beacon: December 16, 1993 Effective: December 9, 1993 B 1419 REC 02366505 12/29/93 15:31 $0.00 2/002 F 1430 MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK & RECORDER WELD CO, CO ORD #178 WNi. 7Y�MMA1 arkWitM a•'C0IN y� � 14t:Sit; .,s .SIMS 11 wry. U4 seateeminsiatier triiiertel=1 ✓et lit': * sitopos eb Wetla r,..-hi- Na cacris.w • AFFIDAVIT OF 1'L'BLICATION STATE OF COLORADO COUNTY OF WELD I, KEITH HANSEN, of said County of Weld, being duly sworn, say that I am publisher of WINDSOR BEACON a weekly newspaper having a general circulation in said County and Stare, published in the town of WD,'DSOR, in said County and State; and that the notice, of which the annexed iy a true copy, has been published in said weekly for / successive weeks, that the notice was published in the regular and entire issue of every number of the paper during the period and time of publication, and in the newspaper proper and not in a supplement, and that the first publication of said notice was in said paper bearing the date of the l day of ji-ec` r -vv i3 . A.D., 19-a and the last publication bearing the date of the day of A.D., 19 and that the said'WLYDSOR BEACON has been published continuously and uninterruptedly for the period of 5 consecutive weeks, in said County and State, prior to the date of first publication of said notice, and the same is a newspaper within' the meaning of an Act to regulate printing of legal notices an • advertisements, approved May 18, 1931, and all prior - as in force LISIiER Subs d and sworn to befote:me;shis /2* day of �? tam.. J4"r z93_ NOTAR PUBLI C - My commission expires 51Ptet,2 ,_ g 9Z . THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT ALL ACCOUNTING MD BUDGETING PROCEDURES HAVE BEEN COMPLETED ON THE ATTACHED LISTED CLAIMS AS SHOWN ON PAGE 1 DATED 12 / 13 /93 TIRIOUGH MD AND THAT PAYMENTS SHOULD BE TO THE RESPECTIVE VENDORS IN THE AMOUNTS SET OPPOSITE THEIR NAMES, WITH THE TOTAL AMOUNT $210, 70 SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER Iq 93 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES. myCOMMISSION EXPIRES WE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY, COLORADO HEREBY APPROVE THE CLAIMS AS SET FORTH ABOVE; AND WARRANTS IN PAYMENT THEREFORE ARE HEREBY ORDERED DRAWN UPON THE PAYOLL FUND - TOTALING $ 210,709.75 DATE THIS 13 AY ryAY OF DECEMBER �"v WARRANT NUMBER PAYEE 017453 017454 TAKE CARE HEALTH PLAN THE HARTFORD INSURANCE GROUP 017455 I AMERICAN GENERAL LIFE INS CO 017456 017457 017458 017459 017460 017461 017462 017463 017464 017465 017466 017467 017468 017469 017470 017471 017472 017473 017474 017475 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE GROUP MERASTAR PAGE 1 OF WELD COUNTY PAYROLL FUND CLAIMS DATE SIGNED PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT ASSOC PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT ASSOC PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT ASSOC RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE WELD COUNTY REVOLVING FUND ROCKY MOUNTAIN LIFE UNITED WAY GREAT WEST LIFE ANNUITY INS Co� COUNTY COURT OF WELD COUNTY (/ OC()) DISTRICT COURT OF BOULDER COUNTY COURT OF WELD COUNTY CLERK OF THE DISTRICT COURT WELD COUNTY DISTRICT COURT CLERK OF THE DISTRICT COURT CLERK OF THE DISTRICT COURT TAKE CARE HEALTH PLAN TAKE CARE COUNTY COURT OF LARINER COUN AMOUNT 197.37 657.11 1,720 98 16,939.91 4,546.64 874.00 20,073.39 115.43 8,328.70 315.03 606.37 643.32 932.36 255.02 325.63 918.67 450.00 3,960.00 50.00 300.00 4,233.88 144,265.94 255.02 WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGIS"ER As OF : 12/08/93 INVOICE NUMBER ACCOUNT NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROJ DATE : 12/08/93 PACE : 1 WARRANT AMOUNT A211397 ANDERSEN'S STAR MARKET 005047 4211398 BIG R OF CREELEY A211399 BRATTON'S, INC A211400 COREN PRINTING A211401 CORPORATE EXPRESS A211402 COUNTRY INN 4211403 DEINES LUMBER CO A211404 DENVER HARDWARE CO 01-1123-6599 19.57 19.57 349011 II -3141-6229 7.38 349193 11-3141-6229 31,30 53418 22472 71672010 71686530 005044 282195 L00461 OI-I0616360-CC 19-41I0-6210-HHW 65-1191-6220 65-11 91-6220 01-1123-6599 01 -1061 -6360 -CC 01 -1061 -6360 -CC 38.68 25,50 25.50 83.08 83.08 56.50 68.00 124.50 ==== == 25.72 25.72 139.26 139.26 159.40 WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER MELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTE1 AS OF : 12/08/93 INVOICE NUMBER ACCOUNT NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROJ DATE : 12/08/93 PAGE : 2 WARRANT AMOUNT A211404 DENVER HARDWARE CO A211405 GALL'S INC A211406 HARPER, VIRGIL G A211407 HUDSON TEXACO A211408 HUGH M. WOODS A211409 JEROME CO A211410 JOSLINS 4211411 KING SOOPERS 562448001013 005046 005045 069580 069606 H10647 005048 394606 01-9020-6220 01-'1123-6599 0I-1123-6599 01 -1061 -6360 -CC 01 -1061 -6360 -CC 01-9020-6380 01-1123-6599 21-6600-6220 159.40 96.49 96.49 3== 550.00 550.00 15.00 15.00 40.74 33.93 74.67 44.96 44.96 z 42.40 42.40 4.99 4.99 WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS OF : 12/08/93 INVOICE NUMBER ACCOUNT NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROJ DATE : 12/08/93 PAGE : 3 WARRANT AMOUNT A2I1412 LEDERLE LAS A221413 OFFEN ACE HARDWARE 6433 87104 A211414 PENNY SAVER MEDICAL SPLY 10238280 A211415 RADIO SMACK A211416 SAFEWAY A2114I7 TARGET STORES I0227 109696 120393 A211418 WALMART DISCOUNT CITIES 005049 565199 A211419 WESTERN AUCTIONEERS 005050 19-4240-6220 2I-6980-6220 19+4140 -6221 -MAT 29-4140-6220 21-6850-6220 19-4140-6220 OI-2123-6599 011061-6360CC 163.30 163.30 85.14 ------- 85•14 87.04 cccccc +87.04 69.99 69.99 === = 26.90 26.90 59.97 59.07 68.23 14,96 83.19 01-1223-6599 496.00 496.00 WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS OF : 12/08/93 INVOICE NUMBER ACCOUNT NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROJ DATE : I2/08/93 PAGE _ 4 WARRANT AMOUNT FINAL TOTAL : 2,525.75 WAP200P WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS OF ; 12/08/93 DATE : 12/08/93 PAGE : THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT ALL ACCOUNTING A4D BUDGETING PRODECURES HAVE BEEN COMPLETED ON THE ABOVE LISTED CLAIMS AS SHOWN ON PAGE 1 THROUGH 4 , AND DATED 12/08/93, AND THAT PAYMENTS SHOULD BE TO THE RESPECTIVE VENDORS IN THE AMOUNTS SET OPPOSITE THEIR NAMES, WITH THE TOTAL AMOUNT DATED THIS i 19 Cis. DIRECTOR •F INANC AND ADM NISTRATION SERVICES SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: s�51i5�7>__. ME THIS /S 1NT DAY OF Q. 19 c3 . comm$ titixesa 1A11, 1, ism ----• NOTARY PUBLIC WE, THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, HERESY (APPROVE) (DISAPPROVE) THE CLAIMS AS SET FORTH ABOVE; AND WARRANTS IN PAYMENT THEREFORE ARE HEREBY ORDERED DRAWN UPON THE eYN1l -___- FUND - TOTALING E_ o�T�l✓, �_ DATED THIS _I_ 9DAY OF 20eaCn 19-11• WELD COUNTY CLERK TO THE BOARD t Y MEMBER CHAIRMAN ws MEMBER MEMBER WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELO COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS OF : 12/08/93 INVOICE NUMBER ACCOUNT NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROJ DATE : 12/08/93 PAGE : 1 WARRANT AMOUNT 5858032 ADAMS, JOHN C 5858033 ALLNUTT FUNERAL SERVICE 5858034 BREEN, WILLIAM P 5858035 CNENORE, SCOTT 5858036 ORS. LEE C LEE 5858037 DRS.WELCH,CARTER C CORNEL S858038 EATON VISION CLINIC 5858039 ELAND, W REX 12-4431-6387-GAV 12-4431-6396-SUR 12-4431-6387-GAV 124431+6387GA V 12-4431-6387-GAV 12+4431-6387-GAV 12-4431-6387-GAV 12+4431+6387-GAV 96.00 96.00 1,010.00 1,010.00 572.90 572.90 160.00 160.00 159.60 159.60 - 32.00 32.00 451.70 451.70 96.00 96.00 WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS OF : 12/08/93 INVOICE NUMBER ACCOUNT NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROJ DATE : 12/08/93 PAGE : 2 WARRANT AMOUNT 5858060 EYEWEAR CENTER INC sesso41 FAMILY EYE CENTER 5858042 FINNI OPTICAL 858043 FOR YOUR EYES ONLY 15858044 FORNEY, W MARK S858045 HARVEY, BERT T S858046 HULME, ROGER A 5858047 JOHNSTOWN DRUG CO 12-44316387GAV I24431-6387-GAV 12-4431+6387-GAV 12-4431_6387-GAV 124431-6351GADN 12-4431-6387+GAV 1244316387GAV 12+4431-6712GADG 669.10 669.10 409.90 409.90 446.60 446.60 371.44 371.44 r= 1,273.00 1,273.00 398.60 s 398.60 231.70 231.70 36.40 36.40 WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS OF : 12/08/93 INVOICE NUMBER 5858048 KING SOOPER PHARMACY 132 $658049 NORTH COLO EYE CENTER 5858050 SIBLERUDI ROBERT L 5858051 STODDARD FUNERAL HOME 5858052 SWAFFORD, MABEL S858053 VISION CLINIC S858054 WINDSOR £YECARE S OPTICAL $858055 ZICK1 R GARY ACCOUNT NUMBER FD DEPT 08) PROJ DATE : 12/08/93 PAGE : 3 WARRANT AMOUNT 12 -4431' -6712 -GAOL 124431-6387-GAV 12-4431-6387-GAV 12 -4431 -6396 -BUR 12-44316710-GAKI 12-4431-6357-GAV 12-4431-6387-GAV 12-4431-6387-GAV 27.34 27.34 127.70 127.70 85.60 85.60 2,500.00 0000~ 2,500.00 210.00 210.00 21502.54 2,502.54 114.I0 114.10 234.40 234.40 WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS OF : 12/08/93 INVOICE NUMBER 5858056 CITY OF GREELEY 5858057 FIRESTONE $858058 HARVEY, BERT T 5858059 VISION CLINIC 5858060 REED OIL C LUSK, RONALD 5858061 CANYON PLUMBING 5858062 CLEAR VISION GLASS 5858063 *OFFICE OF RECOVERY SRVCS ACCOUNT NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROJ DATE : 12/08/93 PAGE : 4 WARRANT AMOUNT 12-4425-6716-EDUC 31.00 124425-67I6-EMPL 15.50 46.50 12-4425-6716-EDUC 176.96 176.96 x 12-4425-6392 88.70 12-4425-6392 12-4425-6392 12-4425-6392 12-4462-6710-REG 12^4463-6710-EMER 12-4463-6710-EMER 12-0001-2085 88.70 95,20 94.20 91.60 281.00 207.65 207.65 500.00 500.00 123.02 ---r--123.02 106.00 WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NURSER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS OF : 12/08/93 INVOICE NUMBER ACCOUNT NUMBER FD DEPT 0BJ PROJ DATE : 12/08/93 PAGE : 5 WARRANT AMOUNT S858063 *OFFICE OF RECOVERY SRVCS 5858064 *SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT S858065 ALANI2, ALICE 5858066 ALDAVA, ANNA N $858067 ALVAREZ, TILLIE 5858068 BINKLEY, KELLI DAWN 5858069 CEMER, SHERRI L S858070 DEUSA, DORTHY DARNISE 106.00 12.0001-2085 5.77 12-0001-2085 12-0001-2045 12-0001-2045 12-0001-2045 12-0001-2045 12-0001-2045 12-0001-2045 155.00 160.77 116.50 116.50 I89.50 189.50 193.00 193.00 57.72 57.72 84.00 84.00 330.00 330.00 WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS OF : 12/08/93 INVOICE NUMBER $858071 ENSMINGER, BARBARA J S858072 FARMER, DONNA E $858073 FINCH, TINA LOUISE 5858074 FLORES, BEVERLY D S858075 FLORES, GRACIELA 5858076 FRITCMELL, NORMA J S858077 GARCIA, CAROL S858078 GARCIA) MARY J ACCOUNT NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROJ DATE : 12/08/93 PAGE : 6 WARRANT AMOUNT 12-0001-2045 12-0002-2045 12-0001-2045 12-0001-2065 12-0001-2045 12-0001-2045 12-0001-2045 12-0001-2045 132.00 132.00 101.50 101.50 74.42 74.42 36.92 36.92 64.62 64.62 200.00 200.00 88.00 88.00 37.50 37.50 WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTE1 AS OF : 12/08/93 INVOICE NUMBER 5858079 GARCIA, RITA 5858080 GESICK, CHERIE 5858081 GLOVER. THERESA K $858082 GONZALEZ. DENISE 5858083 GRANT, DEBBIE L 5858084 GUTIERREZ, DENISE MICHELL 5858085 HERNANDEZ. CATHY $858086 KNOWLDEN, CHRISTI ACCOUNT NUMBER FO DEPT OBJ PROJ DATE : 12/08/93 PAGE : 7 WARRANT AMOUNT 12-0001-2045 12-0001-2045 12-0001-2045 22-00012045 12-0001-2045 12-0001-2045 12-0001-2045 12-0001-2045 76.61 76.61 390.41 390.41 120.00 120.00 27.25 ----M-- - 27.s r 110.00 110.00 111.54 60.50 60.50 64,50 --------- 64.50 WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS OF : 12/08/93 INVOICE NUMBER ACCOUNT NUMBER FD DEPT 05J PROJ DATE : 12/08/93 PAGE : 8 WARRANT AMOUNT 5858087 KOGER, VONDA KAY 5858088 LAK£Y, KELLY ANN S858089 LOPEZ. SOLEDAD 5858090 MCCOY, LAURA LEA 5858091 MENDEZ. ELENA S858092 MIKSCM, TERESA ANN 5858093 MILLER, BARBARA 11$858094 MOELLER. VALINDA 12-0001-2045 12-0001-2045 12-0001-2045 120001-2045 12-0001-2045 I2-0001-2045 12-00012045 12-0001-2045 50.00 50.00 13.91 = 184.60 184.60 400.00 400.00 ==a= 24.23 24.23 67.45 57.45 50.00 50.00 = 150.00 153.00 WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS OF : 12/08/93 INVOICE NUMBER ACCOUNT NUMBER FO DEPT OBJ PROJ DATE : 12/08/93 PAGE : 9 WARRANT AMOUNT 5858095 MOTIS, LINDA L 5858096 OWEN. DULCIE R 5858097 RENFREW. LYNNE CATHRINE 5858098 REYNOLDS. CHERYL A 5858099 RIOS. AURORA 5858100 SANDOVAL. JOYCE B 5858I01 SASSE, LINDA A 5858102 SCHLEDEWITZ, KATHY ANNE 12-0001-2045 12-0001-2045 12-0001-2045 120001-2045 12-0001-2045 12-0001-2045 12-00012045 12-0001-2045 209.59 209.59 154.50 154.50 51.93 51.93 449.00 449.00 42.00 42.00 F-3;3= 186.00 186.00 272.00 Tw-M_-272.00 359.00 359.00 WAP2o0P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS QF : 12/08/93 INVOICE NUMBER 5858103 SEPEDA, VICTORIA MARIA 5858104 VALENCIA, LORI LYNN ses8105 VASQUE2, MARIA IDALIA S858106 VIALPANDO. LAURIE L 5858107 VICK. MONA LOVIsE Sas8108 WEBER, TAMMY JEAN S858109 ZENNER, DAWN MARIE S8S8110 ZUMBRINK, KATHERINE EDNA ACCOUNT NUMBER PD DEPT 05.1 PROD DATE : 22/08/93 PAGE : 10 WARRANT AMOUNT 12-0001-2045 12-0001-2045 12-0001-2045 12-0001-2045 12-0D01-2045 12-0001-2045 Z2-0001-2045 12-0001-2045 194.00 194.00 45.50 45.50 212.00 212.00 66.11 '-_--'------- 66.12 371.00 371.00 __============ 348.04 ------------- 348.04 315.60 315.60 50.00 50.00 WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS OF : 12/08/93 INVOICE NUMBER ACCOUNT NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROJ DATE : 12/08/93 PAGE : II WARRANT AMOUNT FINAL TOTAL : 20,840:17 WAP2O0P WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS OF : 12/08/93 DATE : 12/08/93 PAGE : 12 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT ALL ACCOUNTING AND BUDGETING PRODECURES HAVE BEEN COMPLETED ON THE ABOVE LISTED CLAIMS AS SHOWN ON PAGE 1 THROUGH 11 , AND DATED 12/08/93, AND THAT PAYMENTS SHOULD BE TO THE RESPECTIVE VENDORS IN THE AMOUNTS SET OPPOSITE THEIR NAMES, WITH THE TOTAL AMOUNT DATED THIS � DAY OF DIRECTO a_ 19 9,3. C ANDADMINISTRATION SERVICES SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS �/�,-�y� q �i DAY DF C�4�_19g3 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: MI COMMISSION EXPIRES JAIL 1..106 NOTARY PUBLIC WE, THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 01= WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, HEREBY FORTH ABOVE; PAYMENT THEREFORE ARE HEREBY ORDERED DRAWN UPON THE �.,SSeLtGC F VND - (APPROVE) (DISAPPROVE) THE CLAIMS AS SET WELD COUNTY CLERK TO THE BOARD TY MEMBER v 1�MB ER TOTALING 9 AND WARRANTS IN =_aot8_L CHAIRMAN -24221114ER /1 . r MEMBER WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT R£GISYF.i AS OF :12/09/93 INVOICE NUMBER ACCOUNT NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROD DATE : 12/09/93 PAGE : 1 WARRANT AMOUNT A211420 ARMSTRONG, KRIS A211421 BANGERT, LESLI L A211422 CITY OF DACONO A211423 CWMA A211424 DELEON £ ASSOCIATES A211425 DIRECTOR OF FINANCE A211426 GENERAL CARE REVIEW MI1193 112493 961540 93C WMA 10053 9$6 2152 A211427 GREELEY DAILY TRIBUNE THE 120293 120293 21-6580-6372 794110+6143 01 -1061 -6340 -ROAD 01-2990-6370 01-1125-6350 01 -1061 -6342 -VETS 66 -9020 -6740 -WC 60-2160-6210 60-2160-6210 8.75 8.75 3=======2ZZ==== ♦08.00 409.00 ======_____==== 40.00 40.00 ===s: 160.00 160.00 ss=s===saszas:_ 37.00 37.00 ==z==as=ass=sss 77.33 77.35 * z --s= 2.71 zs*ssss==: 102.00 102.00 204.00 =---s--s 2.71 WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTEt AS OF : 12/09/93 INVOICE NUMBER A211428 ISLAND GROVE APARTMENTS NOV93 A211429 JOBS AVAILABLE A211430 KAUFPROATM, NANCY R A211431 LONG, TED A A211432 MOORE, WENDI A211433 MORRIS, JAMES C 324074 $11193 $11193 MI1193 $11193 A2I1434 NINO-AGUILAR. MARIA E MI1193 ACCOUNT NUMBER FD DEPT 08J PROJ DATE : 12/09/93 PAGE : 2 WARRANT AMOUNT 21-6600-6531 01-3182-6330 21+6680+6372 21+6340+6372 21-6420-6372 21-6430-6372 21-6440-6372 2I-6450-6372 153.00 150.00 =====x======an 93.60 93.60 18.45 18.45 33.00 20.00 27.00 55.25 18.50 153.75 = _______ 21-6600-6375 7.75 21-6430-6372 21-6490-6372 22-6580-6372 7.75 =======2======= 1.50 8.00 64.50 74.00 21-6700-6372 54.25 54.25 WAP20OP WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTE1 AS OF C 12/09/93 INVOICE NUMBER A211435 NOLZ, VONN 41. ACCOUNT NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROJ DATE - 12/09/93 PAGE : 3 WARRANT AMOUNT MI1193 21-6840-6372-0M8 A211436 NORTH WELD COUNTY WATER DISTRICT 12193 12193A 141A 195 34 A211437 NORTHERN ARMORED SERVICE NOV93 120193XXXXXXXX 93NOV A211438 PAULSON, ROBERT J A211439 PETERSON, ROCKY 0110616340 -ROAD 01 -1061 -6340 -ROAD 01 -1061 -6340 -ROAD 011061 -6340 -ROAD 01 -1361 -6340 -ROAD 0190206310 01-1031-6350 01-9020-6310 5.50 ------------- 5.SO ____=====z===== 17.00 17.00 17.00 17.55 17.55 86.10 a== 270.00 115.00 185.00 ----Y--aaaaaaa 570.00 MI1193 21-6450-6372 4.25 21-6960-6372 16.00 MI1193 21-6440-6372 4211440 PUBLIC SERVICE CO OF COLO 2685 83535 84874 A211441 ROCKY MTN NATURAL GAS 4000 01-1O6I-6340ROAD 011061-6340ROAD 01-1061-6340ROAD 20.25 z=x- s=== 76.25 ------T-76.25 =====s=zzxaza=s 8.24 158.62 90.86 257.92 01 -1061 -6340 -ROAD 230.41 WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTE1 AS OF : 12/09/93 INVOICE NUMBER A21144I ROCKY MTN NATURAL GAS A211442 RURAL ELECTRIC CO ACCOUNT NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROD 05652 01 -1062 -6340 -ROAD 53208 01 -1061 -6340 -ROAD A211443 SANDOVAL' EVANGELINE T MI1193 A211444 SOUTHPLATTE VALLEY PHONE1193 A211445 STANLEY N SLOWIK' INC 120393 A211446 SUICHTA. LORI A211447 TEAL. ELIZABETH A211448 THOMAS, ARLENE 112393 MI1193 MI1193 22-6430-6372 21-6490-6372 21-6510-6372 21-6600-6345 01-9020-6380 2I-6490-6390 21-6650-6372 21-6790-6372 DATE : 12/09/93 PAGE : 4 WARRANT AMOUNT 230,41 3========_a=== 48.76 20.20 68.96 saga==sx==2 M.s 12.00 6.00 1.00 19.00 12.89 12.89 s==s===assxasss 500.00 500.00 72.00 72.00 =__ 23.80 23.80 _-= a= 114.53 114.53 =============== WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS OF : 12/09/9; INVOICE NUMBER A211449 TORRES. CLAUDIA A211450 TOWN OF GROVER A211451 TOWN OF JOHNSTOWN REISSUE 12193 12193 A211452 WELD COUNTY FINANCE DEPARTMENT E911REIM ACCOUNT NUMBER FD DEPT 06J PROD DATE :22/09/93 PAGE : 5 WARRANT AMOUNT 21-6640-6375 15.00 25.00 ===3=========== 011062-6340�RDAD 34.78 34.75 ==s=xxs===a==xs 012061-6340'`ROAD 26.00 26.00 == = ===s-_==sx= 6519456940 7I,91I.05 71,911.05 ===a=s=====xwx= FINAL TOTAL : 75,534.02 =a=========s=s= WAP200P WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTE2 AS OF : 12/09/93 DATE : 12/09/93 PAGE : 6 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT ALL ACCOUNTING AND BUDGETING PRODECURES HAVE BEEN COMPLETED ON THE ABOVE LISTED CLAIMS AS SHOWN ON PAGE 1 THROUGH 5 9 AND DATED 12/09/93, AND THAT PAYMENTS SHOULD BE TO THE RESPECTIVE VENDORS IN THE s_ �s17��_GLSI� AMOUNTS SET OPPOSITE THEIR NAMES, WITH THE TOTAL AMOUNT DATED THIS DAY Or DIRECTOR�dF/F`1N Sot AN[J'ADMINISTRATION SERVICES SUBSCRIBED g SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS 4� DAY OF Qay legEE19 :3 . MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: MX COMNUSSION EXPJRES!AN. 1,1885' ssi NOTARY PUBLIC WE, THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, HEREBY (APPROVE) (DISAPPROVE) THE CLAIMS AS SET FORTH ABOVE: AND WARRANTS IN PAYMENT THEREFORE ARE HEREBY ORDERED DRAWN UPON THE Sd 6c' 1� �FFUNND - �TOTT&. INC }-_S1-�13S-.Y� � e OAY1 OF nass.....� MEMBER MEMBER MEMBER MEMBER WAP2O0P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS OF : 12/09/93 INVOICE NUMBER 5858111 CRUZ, MARGARET sesou2 FINCH, TINA LOUISE S858113 GONZALES, CARMEN G S858114 KORGAN, LYNDA FAY 5858115 LEON, YVONNE S858116 ME2A, BERNADINE 5858117 VASQUEZ, ANDREATTA -5858118 ALBA, EUSEBIO ACCOUNT NUMBER FO DEPT OBJ PROJ DATE : 12/09/93 PAGE : 1 WARRANT AMOUNT 12-0001-2030 12-0001-2030 12-0001-2030 12-0301-2030 12-0001-2030 12-0001-2045 12-0001-2030 12-0001-2040 139.00 139.00 Zr 51.16 51.16 a xaan 226.23 226.23 ======= ===2222 1.00 1,00 =============== 160,00 160.00 ==== 219,00 219.00 219.00 1.00 1.00 80.66 80.66 =============S= WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTEI AS OF : 12/09/93 INVOICE NUMBER ACCOUNT NUMBER FD DEPT OBJPROJ DATE : 12/09/93 PAGE : 2 WARRANT AMOUNT S858119 ALVAREZ, UBALDO S858120 MESTAS. JOHN S $858121 *CLERK OF THE DISTRICT CO 5858122 *ARTHUR COUNTY COURT S858123 *CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMEN S858124 *CLERK OF THE DISTRICT CT S858125 *COLLECTION SRVCS CENTER $858126 *GWEN T. HYATT 12-0001-2040 17.00 17.00 12-0001-2040 682.00 882.00 _=======*=S==== 12-44336710-REIS 11.00 11.00 12-0001-2085 381.00 381.00 12-0301-2085 77.14 77.14 ============= 12-0001-2085 800.00 800.00 = ==== 120001-2085 107.00 107.00 12-0001-2085 370.03 370.03 WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS OF : 12/09/93 INVOICE NUMBER 5858127 *MASON COUNTY COURT 5858128 *OFFICE OF RECOVERY SRVCS 5858129 AGUILERA, CLAUDINE MONICA S858130 ALLMER. LILLIAN CHRISTINE 585813I BLACKSTON, SUZANNE M 5858132 CASARES, SALLY J 5858133 BURDEN. KATHERINE K 5858134 ESPARZA, PAULA ACCOUNT NUMBER FD DEPT 00J PROJ DATE : 12/09/93 PAGE : 3 WARRANT AMOUNT 12-0002-2085 12-0001-2085 12-0001-2045 12-0001-2045 12-0001-2045 12-0001-2045 12-0001-2045 12-0001-2045 228.00 228.00 =2===a===2=s=112 100.00 100.00 ====s======2== 124.50 124.50 s ==s= 90 .0 0 90.00 _______________ 125.31 125,31 88.00 88.00 =s=======S3==== 457.00 457,00 237,07 237.07 ===2==sass===s2 WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTIE2 AS Of : 12/09/93 INVOICE NUMBER 5858135 GARCIA* ANDREA J 5858136 GEIMSLER* TAMMY KAY 5858137 MAYES* ELAINE MARIE 5858138 HERNANDEZ* JUDY RAY 5858139 JOHNSON, JEANNE K 5858140 JUML, LYNN N 5858141 KLINE1 STACY RACMELL 5858142 LANGLEY, JAMIE ACCOUNT NUMBER CD DEPT 08.1 PROJ DATE 12/09/93 PAGE : 4 WARRANT AMOUNT t2-0001-2045 12-.0001..2045 12-0001-2045 I2-0001-2045 12-0001-2045 12-0001-2045 12-0001-2045 12-0001-2045 37.50 ----r....... 7.50 S==as==ass 150.00 150.00 250.00 SIMINIIIIWilMSSWOMpaelliWeMIPP 250.00 70.96 70.96 _= s-sss= 394.00 394.00 =z=s==s==zz==-= 200.00 200.00 s _______ 110.00 110.00 ---===as 67.56 67.56 = :=====mzz==as= WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTE4 AS OF : 12/09/93 INVOICE NUMBER ACCOUNT NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROD DATE : 12/09/93 PAGE : 5 WARRANT AMOUNT 5858143 MARTINEZ, MARIE BERTHA 585814♦ MITCHELL, BARBARA A 5858145 PEREZ, DORALIZ JUAREZ S858146 REYES, EVELYN 3858147 ROUSE, DEBRA SUE S858148 SARGENT, VALERIE A 5858149 SCHILL, EDWARD ANTHONY $858150 SLACK, MICHELLE 12-0001-2045 12-0001-2045 12-0001-2045 12-0001-2045 12-0301-2045 120001-2045 12-0301-2045 12-0001-2045 57.00 ....... 57.00 =============== 83.00 80.00 _=========ma=ma 69I.56 691.56 ==assn==s===== 52.06 52.06 ====s====sza=aa 75.00 75.00 =x======xz=a==x 83.00 83.00 ____=====a=== 83.52 83.52 =s=s=======axzx 44.17 44.17 WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTEl AS OF : 12/09/93 INVOICE NUMBER S058151 STEPHENS, VICKI LYNN 5858152 TREVINO, SELIA S858153 WASHA, CHRISTINE ANN SaS81s4 WEEDMAN, MARGARET ANN 5858155 PEREZ, DORALIZ JUAREZ ACCOUNT NUMBER FO DEPT 08J PROD DATE : 12/09/93 PAGE : 6 WARRANT AMOUNT 12+0001 -zoos 12+00012045 12a-0001-2045 12+0001-2045 12-4433+6710-REIS FINAL TOTAL : 6.50 6.50 200.00 200.00 400.00 400.00 5.77 5.77 ==3==========fl 100.00 100.00 t=====_=====t== 8.131.70 WAP200P WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS OF : 12/09/93 DATE : 12/09/93 PAGE : 7 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT ALL ACCOUNTING AVD BUDGETING PRODECURES HAVE BEEN COMPLETED ON THE ABOVE LISTED CLAIMS AS SHOWN ON PAGE 1 THROUGH 6 ♦ AND DATED 12/09/93$ AND THAT PAYMENTS SHOULD 8_ TO THE RESPECTIVE VENDORS IN THE AMOUNTS SET OPPOSITE THEIR NAMES, WITH THE TOTAL AMOUNT f_ -Jj_1_40__. DATED THIS 11714DAY OF 11WL]�I._ 19 LCLJ• DIRECTOR OF FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION SERVICES SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS .13 DAY MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: OF eria 1letY-1923 . MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 7AN._Ii��iit_;. __• NOTARY PUBLIC WE, THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, HEREBY (APPROVE) (DISAPPROVE) THE CLAIMS AS SET FORTH ABOVE: AND WARRANTS IN PAYMENT THEREFORE ARE HEREBY ORDERED DRAWN UPON THE _ fi3UND - TOTA- ING f_..Y.rJ 3LL2Q_ DATED THIS I vt AY OF atatta- 19_a WELD COUNTY CLERK TO THE BOARD MEMBER MEMBER CHAIRMAN MEMBER WWP9S2PA WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY COIN WARRANT REGIST?R REPORT PAYROLL DATE 12/09/93 DATE : 12/39/93 PAGE : 1 INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROD AMOUNT 831513 STODDARD FUNERAL HOME 831514 STODDARD FUNERAL HOME 831515 ALDAVA, ANNA M 831516 BRINKLEY, PEARL A 831517 CHAIREZ, NOENE 631518 DEKOV• CHRISTINE 831519 GONZALES, JOSEPH A 631520 GRAFFIA, ANTONIA 00377131 06941702 03576492 03576492 36419292 06410292 06561192 06561192 04349992 04349992 12 -4440 -6396 -BUR 1,245.00 1,245.00 124440-6396-8UR 1,000.00 1,000.00 x-x_s 12 -4433 -6710 -SUP 142.00 124433 -6710 -SUP 142.00 12 -4433 -6710 -SUP 12 -4433 -6710 -SUP 12 -4433 -6710 -SUP 12 -4433 -6710 -SUP 284.00 =============== 298.00 298.00 596.00 __= xxxxsas 212.00 280.00 492.00' 12 -4433 -6710 -SUP 319.00 12 -4433 -6710 -SUP 335.00 06872892 12-4433-6710-5UP 05853492 05853492 12 -4433 -6710 -SUP 12 -4433 -6710 -SUP 654.00 99.00 99.00 179.00 308.00 487.00 WWP9S2PA WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER MELD COUNT! COIN WARRANT REGIST_R REPORT PAYROLL DATE 12/09/93 INVOICE NUMBER 831521 MILLERS CATHERYN S 831522 MORENO, MARCELINO 831523 PARRAS* MARIA L 831524 ZAMORA* REBECCA 831525 MCLAUGHLIN, MARTHA 831526 TRONCOSO* NARGARITO 831527 ACEVEDO* SUSANA 06921492 06921 492 06806692 06806692 03490792 03497792 ACCOUNT NUMBER FD DEPT 05J PROJ DATE : 12/09/93 PAGE ; 2 AMOUNT 12+4433 -6710 -SUP 99.00 I2 -4433 -6710 -SUP 99.00 198.00 12-4433-6710SUP 109.00 12 -4433 -67I0 -SUP 280.00 12 -4433 -6710 -SUP 12 -4433 -6710 -SUP 389.00 ___ 76.00 356.00 432.00 =============s= 06176392 12-44336710SUP 92.00 06176392 12 -4433 -6710 -SUP 235.00 327.00 01579502 01578572 06657301 06657301 06569592 =====3===x===== 12-4440-6732-R£T 4.00 12-4440-6732+RET 4.00 8.00 ============x== 12-4440-6732-RET 160.00 12-4440-6732-RET 490.00 Ada mat 650.00 =============== __^__ 12-4433-6732-RET I85.00 185.00 r=====_________ WWP9S2PA WELD COUNTY COIN WARRANT REGISTER REPORT PAYROLL DATE 12/09/93 DATE : 12/09/93 PAGE : 3 WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT 08J PROJ AMOUNT mmm 831528 ACOSTA. MARIE A 831529 AGUERO. IRENE 831530 CARDENAS. DIANA E 831531 CARTERI'DEBORA 831532 COOK. JAMES C 831533 DANIELS. DAWN R 83I534 DAVILA. AMALIA 8 831535 DENOFF, DURANDA 05066592 06150892 06675592 06675592 06992892 06898092 05661392 03020592 07003492 12-4433-6732 -RET 12-4433-6732-RET 12-4433-6732-R£T 12-4433-6732-RET 12-4433-6732-RET 12-4433-6732-RET 12-4433-6732-RET 12-4433-6732-RET 12-4433-6732RET 313.00 313.00 a=a=s=ax==-tsar= 356.00 356,00 185.00 185.00 370.00 356.00 356.00 =a= 372.00 372.00 =============== 77.00 77.00 = = 149.00 149.00 ___=====ax=xx== 356.00 ma mm mmmmmm 356.00 ass ss-t=ar=t=ar MMP9S2PA WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY" COIN WARRANT REGIST=R REPORT PAYROLL DATE 12/09/93 831536 FELLERS, CNARLENE M 831537 FIELDS, NANCY J 831538 FLORES, JANNELLE R 831539 FLORES, WILLA M 831540 FREDERICK, DIANA R 63154I GARCIA? CORINNE M 831542 GARCIA) RITA 83154:i GARCIA, VIVIANA DATE : 12/09/93 PAGE : 4 INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROD AMOUNT 04611992 04611992 06696592 04735592 05094292 06113792 06113792 05200892 05200892 03771292 06628992 12-44336732RET 99.00 12-4433-6732RET 99.00 12-4433-6732-RET 124433-6732RET 12-4433-6732-R£T 124433-6732-RET 12-44336732-RET 198.00 ==============s 432.00 432.00 =2= a22_ 266.00 266.00 ==a===a=====z= 557.00 557.00 ==a=======rata=. 227.00 266.00 493.00 ==a=a====a==m2= 12-4433-6732-R£T 9.00 12-4433-6732-RET 76.00 85.00 I2-4433-6732-RET 415.00 415.00 ====saatanr=== 124433-6732-RET 76.00 76.00 WWP952PA WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY COIN WARRANT REGISTER REPORT PAYROLL DATE 12/09/93 INVOICE NUMBER 831544 GEARHART, BECKY 1831545 GOMEZ, JESSICA 11631546 GONZALE5, LISA N 831547 HAMILTON, ANDREA N 831548 HEMBREY, AMANDA 831549 HERNANDEZ, ROSHEL 831550 JUREK, GAIL 831551 KEETON, RONDA N 05765092 05765092 06639792 05406192 05691792 06156392 06478792 05I'25892 05598692 ACCOUNT NUMBER FD DEPT 08J PROJ DATE : 12/09/93 PAGE : 5 AMOUNT 12-4433-6732-RET 12-4433-6732-RET 12-`433-6732-RET 12-4433-6732-RET 12-4433-6732-RET 12-4433-6732-R£T 12-4433-6732-RET 12-4433-6732-RET' 12-4 433-6732-RET 49.00 108.00 157.00 =x= x==== 280.00 280.00 280.00 280.00 ======2== 238.00 cc 238.00 =s =2==xsx 372.0O 372.00 280.00 280.00 22Z=====t==== 2 280.00 280.00 ==3i= 356.00 356.00 ass====n2aaaa=;. WWP9S2PA WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER 631552 LEDESMA, ODILIA WELD COUNTY COIN WARRANT REGIST`R REPORT PAYROLL "DATE 12/09/93 831553 LIVINGSTON. KATHLEEN 831554 LOGSDON. REBECCA M 831555 MARG. RENEE A 831556 MABRY. THERESA DATE : 12/09/93 PAGE : 6 INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER NUMBER ED DEPT OBJ PROD AMOUNT 06966592 06281692 06371592 06792692 06792692 06792692 03952292 831557 MALDONADO. LYNNETT£ V 04403792 04403792 831558 MARR, SUSAN E 631559 MARTINEZ. RUTHIE A 05562492 06407I92 12-4433-6732-RET 12-44336732-RET 12-4433-6732RET 12.4433-6732-RET 12-4433-6732-RET 12-4433-6732-RET 101.00 101.00 ============s== 356.00 356.00 =s===== = 262.00 262.00 s=====s==sas=s= 20.00 61.00 61.00 142.00 12-4433-6732-RET 512.00 12-4433-6732-RET 12-4433-6732-RET 512.00 ============3=S 284.00 284.00 565.00 12-4433-6732-RET 304.00 as= 304.00 12-4433-6732-RET 356.00 356.00 WWP952PA WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY COIN WARRANT REGISTER REPORT PAYROLL'DATE 12/09/93 INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT 084 PROD AMOUNT 831560 RATA, REBECCA E 831561 MIRA, CARPIO 831562 OLIVAS, BARBARA 31563 OWENS, JESSICA 831564 PADILLA, CYNTHIA 831565 PIERCE, PAMALA M 831566 REDFERN, NANCY M 05848092 05787892 06509192 06788492 06788492 06788492 059150292 05950292 05224392 03973992 03973992 03973992 03973992 03973992 03973992 03973992 DATE : 12/09/93 PAGE : 7 12-4433-6732+RET 12-4433+6732+RET 12+4433-6732-RET 12-4433+6732+RET 12-4433+6732-RET 12+4433 6732+RET 280.00 280.00 =2=====3arfln= 185.00 185.00 ===st=f2= 280.00 280.00 230.00 280.00 280.00 a 790.00 ==f===2===afsf= 12+4433-6732-RET 61.00 1244336732-RET 376,00 437.00 =2 - 124433+6732-RET 432,00 12+4433-6732-RET 12-4433-6732+RET 12-4433+6732-RET 12+4433-6732-RET 12-4433-6732-RET 12-4433-6732-RET 22-4433-6732+RET • 432.00 2=R=========ss= 57.00 76.00 76,00 76.00 76.00 76.00 76.00 513,00 «__==flats===== WWP952PA WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY - COIN WARRANT REGISTER REPORT PAYROLL DATE 12/09/93 DATE : 12/09/93 PAGE : 8 INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROD AMOUNT 831567 RENDON, NANETTE 831568 RIVERA. TERESA M 831569 STATLEY1 FAWNDA 831570 STEPHENS. CHRISTINA M 831571 STERCK, GEORGEANN 831572 TAVENNER. CHERI 831573 VASQUEZ. JORGE E 831574 VEGA. NANCY 05888692 06374992 06374992 96374992 1244336732-RET 356.00 12-4433-6732-RET 12-4433-6732-RET 12-4433-6732-RET 356.00 =ta ta=t=S=Latta 18.00 45.00 235.00 298.00 =2==t=at===fsfl 06648892 12-4433-6732-RET 219.00 06648892 12-4433^6732-RET 219.00 07011792 06637492 06334292 06209392 06460192 12-4433-6732-RET 12-4433-6732-RET 12-4 433-6732-RET 12-4433-6732-RET 12-4433-6732-R£T 438.00 =a=a=:asst=sat 311.00 311.00 356.00 356.00 356.00 356.00 s -3 280.00 280.00 2==a 3^ 411.00 411000 =========55-55== WWP952PA WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUWT✓ COIN WARRANT REGIST=R REPORT PAYROLL DATE 12/09/93 DATE - 12/09/93 PAGE 7 9 INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT 08J PROJ AMOUNT 831575 VELASQUEZ, LINA J 831576 VIGIL, GLORIA 831577 WAGNER. CONNIE 5 831578 ZARAGOSA, MARIA E 04940292 03972492 D5378592 06253392 12-4433-6732-RET 12-4433-6732-RET 12-4433-6732-RET 12-4433-6732-RET FINAL TOTAL 512.00 512.00 432.00 -_r--432.00 =====x========= 356.00 356.00 2=a====sax==a== 99.00 99.00 ========fl===== 23,883.00 ==S aa2=====an WWP9S2PA WELD COUNTY COIN WARRANT REGISTER REPORT PAYROLL DATE 12/09/93 DATE : 12/09/93 PAGE : 10 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT ALL ACCOUNTING AND BUDGETING PROCEDURES NAVE BEEN COMPLETED ON THE ABOVE LISTED CLAIMS AS SHOWN ON PAGE 1 THROUGH 9 s AND DATED 12109/93, AND THAT PAYMENTS SHOULD SE TO THE RESPECTIVE VENDORS IN THE AMOUNTS SET OPPOSITE THEIR NAMES, WITH THF TOTAL AMOUNT 2_024253_0_0_. DATED THIS _L DAY 0 S% _1.SC✓� Lll�d_1ta� 19 93. DIRECTOR 0 PNN AND ADMINISTRATION SERVICES SUBSCRIBED _AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS .214...3114DAY OF Q ntl95. MY, COMMISSION EXPIRES: L COWMISS101i aP1RFS JnrJ I, 1�;6-------' NOTARY PUBLIC WE, THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Or WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, HEREBY (APPROVE) (DISAPPROVE) THE CLAIMS AS SET FORTH ABOVE; AND WARRANTS IN PAYMENT THEREFORE ARE HEREBY ORDERED DRAWN UPON THE 51.11eCAL: 1,L41 Ect FUND - TO fl LING f_%22 AY OF Q aCC €�Jr... 19_1(3_. DATED THIS WELD COUNTY CLERK T THE BOARD TY MEMBER MEMBER CHAIRMAN NAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS OF : 12/11/93 INVOICE NUMBER ACCOUNT NUMBER FD DEPT OSJ PROJ DATE : 12/11/93 PAGE : I WARRANT AMOUNT A211453 ACCESS CATALOG COMPANY I94145 A211454 AIDS IMPACT, INC 113093 A211455 AIDS NATIONAL INTERFAITH NETWORK 113093 A211456 AIKEN, PAUL M JR N0V93CC A211457 AIMS COMMUNITY COLLEGE M105 A211458 ALLDREDGE. JERRY K. MI1093 MI1193 A211459 ANSON. ROSE M 120793 86-2311-6250-COMN 19-4240-6220-H1V 19 -4140 -6320 -RING 21-6450-6390 21-6490-6383 21-'6530-6383 2I-6580-6383 21-6440-6383 122.90 122.90 332.80 332.80 == 10.00 10,00 42.50 42.50 30.00 44,00 30.00 30.00 134.00 0134006370 390.75 496.99 01-3400-6370 --$67.74 79-4410-6143 283.00 283.00 WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS OF : 12/11/93 INVOICE NUMBER ACCOUNT NUMBER FO DEPT 0BJ PROD DATE : 12/11/93 PAGE : 2 WARRANT AMOUNT A211460 BACHMAN, GORDON R A211461 BAKER, TROY ALLEN A211462 BATTY PHYLLIS A211463 BAUER, RICHARD M REISSUE 63-9020-6740-D£NT 299.00 791041-6143 359.00 MI1193 01-3400-6210 01-3400-6370 658.00 10.29 232.75 243.04 ===-- 004304 63-9020-6740-VISN 13.50 79-1031-6143 13.50 004292 A211464 BEARS CAR WASH S STORAGE W23020 A211465 DECKER, DAVE A211466 BESTWAY CONCRETE 004293 63 -90206740 -DENT 01".11236361 63-9020-6740-VISN 79••31806143 119998 01 -1061 -6360 -CC 27.00 128.50 128.50 17.00 17.00 140.00 256.60 396.60 5 190.00 190.00 = = WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS OF : 12/11/93 INVOICE NUMBER ACCOUNT NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROJ DATE : 12/1I/93 PAGE : 3 WARRANT AMOUNT A211467 B10..INTERGRAL RESOURCE CENTER 112993 A211468 BIOMEDICAL COMMUNICATIONS 113093 A211469 BOARD OF REAL ESTATE APPRAISERS 1209LIC A211470 BOYLE, BRENDA A A211471 BRATTON'S.INC 4211472 BURCH, JILL E 1I24MI C54248 I9-4110-6333-MMW 19 -4140 -6322 -COL 01-1041-6330 01-1)41-6370 21-6960-6363 113093 19-4140-6370-CDP 19 -4140 -6370 -HIV 19-4140-6370-RUR 120193 79-4140-6143 A211473 CITIZEN'S CLEARINGHOUSE FOR HAZARDOUS WASTES 112993 19-4110-6333-HMW A211474 CITY OF GREELEY 75.00 75.00 43.00 43.00 xs_xm: 154.00 154.00 r 63.50 63.50 I25.00 125.00 sr= 26.75 33.00 2.75 25,00 87.50 25.00 25.00 120993 01-9D20-6381 817.00 WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS OF : 12/II/93 INVOICE NUMBER 4211474 CITY OF GREELEY A21I475 CLARK BOARDMAN CALLAGHAN 16622 A211476 CLERK CIRCUIT COURT A211477 CLIFTON, SHARON A211478 COFFEE MAID REISSUE SC1293 9701A A211479 COLO DEPT SOCIAL SERVICES OC T 93 A211480 COLO DIST ATTORNEYS COUNCIL 12693 4211481 COLO INCINERATION SERVICES INC 28815 DATE : 12/11/93 PACE : 4 ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT FD DEPT 08J PROD AMOUNT 8I7.00 01-1t23-6229 76.15 76.15 01-2110-6599-CIVL I4.80 14.80 01-3400-6310 20.00 20.00 =========4;===== 01-1I26-6210 46.99 46„99 ===========°=== 21-6790-6599 1,139.39 1,139.39 01-2123-6229 294.00 294.00 s_:= 01 -2310 -6220 -SUDS 37.15 37.15 WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS OF : 12/12/93 INVOICE NUMBER ACCOUNT NUMBER FD DEPT 05J PROJ DATE : 12/1I/93 PAGE : 5 WARRANT AMOUNT A211482 COLO RURAL WEALTH RESOURCE CENTER 113093 19-4110-6335 A211483 COLO STATE UNIVERSITY DC1694 001694 DG1694 D5169♦ J51694 A21I484 COLO SURPLUS PROP AGENCY 1840A 4211485 COLOTEX ELECTRIC SUPPLY DISCOUNT 269005 272912 273720 274371 A211486 CORER PRINTING A211487 COSSON, KEN A 12478 12544 22404 22442 01-31826370 01-3182-6370 01-3182-6370 01-3182-6370 01-3182-6370 100.00 100.00 ==s===== 60.00 60.00 60,00 120.00 60.00 360.00 ========__=s=== 01 -10616360 -CC 30.00 01 -1061 -6236 -CC 01 -1061 -6236 -CC 01-10616236CC 0 11061 -6236 -CC 011061 -6236 -CC 19-4140-6320-IMM 19-4140-6320-IMM 19-4140-6320-IMM 19-4140-6320-IMM 30.00 1.38 11.48 20.93 86,62 18.74 136.39 18.60 193.20 160.00 102.49 474.29 004294 63-90206740VI5N 33.00 33.00 sass WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS OF : I2/11/93 INVOICE NUMBER ACCOUNT NUMBER FD DEPT 08J PROD DATE : 12/12/93 PAGE : 6 WARRANT AMOUNT A211488 CRAWFORD SUPPLY COMPANY 181842 I81844 A211489 CRONOUIST, MARK V 86-2311-6250-COMM 86-23116220 MI1093 01-3400-6370 MI1193 01-3400-6370 A211490 CUNLIFFE. JR., CHAS A 112793 120793 A211491 CURTIN MATHESON SCI INC SHIPPING 2571314 HANDLING 5CH SHIP C HANDLE SHIPPING SHIPPING HANDL 2562671 2571309 2571310 2571312 2571313 2571314 2580054 A211492 DATA CONTROL SYSTEMS INC 15024 79-1014-6143 79-2014-6143 132.85 48.66 181.51 155.48 75.64 231.12 30.00 8.00 --- 30.00 194170-6220-W 5.20 19-4170-6250-GNRL 5.72 19-4170-6250-MDIA 18.13 I9-4170-6250-MDIA 5.40 1944170-6250-MDIA 5.40 194I70-6250-MDIA 5.74 194170-6250MDIA 5.28 194170-6250-MDIA 5.40 19-4170-6250-MDIA 18.13 194170-6250-MDIA 84.23 19-4170-6250MDIA 38.18 19-4170-6250-MDIA 11.02 29-4170-6250-GNRL 61.80 19-4170-6250-GNRL 444.60 1941706250-MDIA 11.25 19-4270-6220-W 26.86 742.34 ====== === _ 01-1031-6214 2,596.44 2,596.44 _======__====== WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS OF : I2/11/93 INVOICE NUMBER ACCOUNT NUMBER PD DEPT OBJ PROJ DATE : 12/11/93 PAGE : 7 WARRANT AMOUNT 4211493 DAVIDSON. MEREDITH 4211 494 W318712 249033-6397-471g 212.00 212.00 _--•- -==== DAVIS AUDIOVISUAL SL69991-1 UPS 4211495 DEEP ROCK NORTH A211496 DELEON C ASSOCIATES A21I497 DENVER POST 19 -4140 -6212 -HIV 194I40-6212-N1V 419,75 6,41 426.16 == 11303 01-1126-6210 12063 0I-1125-6330 40,75 85.50 126.25 20357 113093 A211498 DICTAPHONE CORPORATION M862026 4211499 DIETzGEN CORPORATION 300614 A211500 EMPIRE ELEC., INC. 11373 01-1123-6350 01+31826330 01-9020-6212 011021-6360 0110 61 -6236 -CC == 166.90 166.90 ---r-======== 487.60 487.60 = = 95.00 95.00 ==a 46.07 46.07 3.825.30 WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS OF : 12/11/93 INVOICE NUMBER ACCOUNT NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROD DATE : 12/11/93 PAGE : 8 WARRANT AMOUNT A211500 EMPIRE ELEC.. INC. A2I1501 ERBES. MOLLIE K 11375 0281 A211502 FANGMEIER, DEBRA K 034 1208MI A211503 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 113093A 1130938 A2115D4 FINK. ROBERT R A211505 GOBLE. KEVIN L 112493 004295 A211506 GREELEY DAILY TRIBUNE THE 79932 A211507 GREELEY DAILY TRIBUNE THE 1206NA 01 -1061 -6236 -CC 79-6600-6147 79-1041-6147 01-1041-6370 112.33 3.937.63 580.00 580.00 29.00 31.75 60.75 I9 -4140 -6310 -CTS 71.00 19 -4140 -6310 -CTS 31.00 01-1123-6370 63 -9020 -6740 -DENT 01-1154-6337 25-9080-6337-93 102.00 =-- 83.75 83.75 36.50 36.50 = = 65.29 65.29 ====== 90.00 WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS OF t 12/11/93 INVOICE NUMBER ACCOUNT NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROD DATE : 12/1I/93 PAGE : 9 WARRANT AMOUNT A211507 GREELEY DAILY TRIBUNE THE A211508 GREELEY PATHOLOGIST A211509 GREEN PEACE 4211510 GUTIERREZ, CECELIA A211511 HAGUE, GARY A211512 HALL, WESLEY E. A21I513 HANES, CLAUD W 120193 113093 MI1193 12693A 126930 ATTACHED 0I-21 SC' -6350 19-4110-6333-HHW 21-6600-6375 19-4170-6370-A 19-4170-6345-F 19-4170-6370-F 19-4170-6370-5 90.00 4,200,00 4,200.00 ===3C 5.00 5.00 s a z= 18.50 18,50 15.00 1.75 61.25 13.50 91.50 =--===== 01-2180-6350 895.00 895.00 24016 79-1152-6143 63.00 24028 79-1152-6143 A211514 HARBERT. CONSTANCE L ME1293 23.00 86.00 01-1011-6377-D2 78.62 WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS OF : 12/12/93 INVOICE NUMBER A211514 HARBERT. CONSTANCE L MI1293 004296 A211515 HARTMANN II, JAMES F 11053 A211516 MA5CM, SANDRA K A211517 MAUSE, JOYCE ACCOUNT NUMBER FD DEPT 08J PROJ DATE : 12/11/93 PAGE : 10 WARRANT AMOUNT 01-1011-6375-02 63 -9020 -6740 -DENT 79-1011-6143 108.50 62.50 17.50 267.12 01-1123-6370 47.50 MI1193 21-6790-6372 21-6790-6373 112393 A211518 HEALTH COMMUNICATIONS, INC 12043 4211519 HOYT, JUDITH K A211520 MUFFMAN, DAVID L A211521 INLOES. GENE M11206 004297 MI1193 79-4410-6143 01-1125-6330 01-1041-6370 63 -9020 -6740 -DENT 01-3400-6370 =_ 47.50 146.75 40.00 ------- 186.75 114.20 114.20 26.45 26.45 ====r_+s=-===s== 233.75 233.75 36.00 36.00 248.50 WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS OF : 12/11/93 INVOICE NUMBER ACCOUNT NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROD DATE : 12/11/93 PAGE : 11 WARRANT AMOUNT A211521 INLOES, GENE A21I522 INSTANT PHOTOS INC. 4211523 JANDA, BARBARA L 4211524 JEROME CO A211525 JONES-WININGER INC 27016 MI1193 M10918 M10954 I0954M 5TR1993-30 A211526 KEEFE COFFEE AND SUPPLY 123078 A211527 KIBURZ, STEVEN L A211528 KOBEL, CAROL S 120793 12293 248.50 01-1154-6210 58.53 58.53 SS 01-1110-6370 20.00 86-2311-6220 86-2311-6250-COMM 86-23126212 019020+6350 86-2311-6250-COMM 79..69506 143 43 01-1123-6370 20.00 xx 16.04 235.64 11.86 263.54 220,55 220.55 =ire - 502,23 502.23 _============== 16.00 16.00 75.00 75.00 x= =x====== WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS OF : 12/11/93 INVOICE NUMBER A21I529 LEDERLE LAB A211530 LEVERENT2, JEANNIE A211531 LIESS, DONNA 6433 DISCOUNT DATE : 12/11/93 PAGE : 12 ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT FD DEPT OBJ PROD AMOUNT 19-4140-6220 19-4140-6220 7027A 01-1123-6350 MI1193 01+3400+6370 A211532 LOWELL-PAUL FARM DAIRY 47005 A2I1533 MATT, JULIE A. A211534 MATTLEY, GRACE A2I1535 MCCABE? GARY 653.20 16.33- +---+------_.._ 636.87 10.00 10.00 88.3I 88.31 19+4170-6250+GNRL45.64 ------------- 45.64 11183 01-1123-6350 12193 19-4140-6370GDP 19-41406370+HIV 120693 6021606370 A211536 MICRO COMPUTER WORLD INC 29821 65+11916212 911.61 911.61 44.00 44.00 15.00 .25 15.25 615.00 WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS OF : 12/11/93 INVOICE NUMBER ACCOUNT NUMBER FO DEPT OBJ PROJ DATE : 12/11/93 PAGE : 13 WARRANT AMOUNT A211536 MICRO COMPUTER WORLD INC A211537 MINOLTA OFFICE SYSTEM INC 3120305026 A211538 MONDRAGON, MARY ANN A211539 NATIONWIDE PAPERS A211540 NELSON, HARVEY A211541 N£VE'S UNIFORMS INC A2I1542 NEWBREY, ROBIN L 004298 DISCOUNT FREIGHT 47733-I1 M11193 G07817 GO8261 G08663 G08803 008815 610145 G10226 G10282 010283 004299 01-I945-6940 63 -9020 -6740 -DENT 64-1155-6250-PAPR 64-1155-6250-PAPR 64-1155-6250-PAPR 21-6650-6372 01-2110 -6225-TRNG 0I-2110-6225-TRNG 01-2110-6225-TRNG 01-2110-6225-TRNG 01-2110-6225-TRNG OI-2110-6225-TRNG 01-2110-6225-TRNG 01-2110-6225-TRNG 01-2110-6225-TRNG 63 -90206740 -DENT 615.00 -S fl 1,502.00 1,502.00 45.00 45.00 _ 1.40- 7.70 69.78 76.08 =St== 18.50 18.50 47.85 26.85 220.00 1,038.35 26.85 95.70 1,654.90 57.70 223.30 3,391.50 93.00 WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS OF : 12/11/93 INVOICE NUMBER ACCOUNT NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROJ DATE : 12/I1/93 PAGE : 14 WARRANT AMOUNT A211542 NEWBREY, ROBIN L A211543 NORTH COLO MEDICAL CENTER 113093 93113 A211544 NORWEST BANK DENVER N• A. 12193 A211545 PADGETT, LARRY A211546 PENNINGTON, ANNE E MI1193 8750 A211547 PENNY SAVER MEDICAL SPLY 10117651 10215510 A211548 PEREZ, DOROTHY M A21I549 PETERSON, ARLEN MI1193 12393 01-2180-6350 01^11236350 90.00 11457.02 5.00 1,462.02 sx 77-5300-6610 739.50 77-5300-6620 468.89 21-6600-6375 79-1192-6143 19-4140-6220 19-4170-6250MDIA 1,208.39 47.75 47.75 25.00 25.00 61.19 14.70 75.89 s_ 21-6600-6375 107.00 107.00 19-414O6370CDP 2.75 19 -4140 -6370 -MAT 8.10 WAP2o0P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS OF : 12/11/93 INVOICE NUMBER ACCOUNT NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROJ DATE 12/I1/93 PAGE : 15 WARRANT AMOUNT A211549 PETERSON, ARLEN 10.85 ----==--=x===== A211550 PETTY CASH -DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE I2693 01-1123-6210 A211551 PLUTA, EILEEN A211552 PROBERT, CURTIS L 28809 MI1193 A211553 RANKOTA INN 6 CONF. CTR. 109962 A211554 RATHKE, GARY L A211555 REPORTER (THE) A211556 REV, MIKE 11223 12793 MI1193 60-2160-6599 01-3400-6370 21-6950-6379 011126-6370 01-1011-6311 21-6340-6372 21-6440-6372 4.00 4.00 ===== 278.46 278.46 165.45 165.45 at 23.00 23.00 111.63 111.63 102.00 102.00 12.00 58.50 70.50 = WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER MELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS OF : 12/11/93 INVOICE NUMBER A211557 ROLM A211558 RURAL ELECTRIC CO R73761$ ZW1210 A211559 SANDOVAL, PATRICIA C MI1193 64211560 SCHELTINGA, DREW L A211561 SCHLOAT, ANSON 9202978106 123093 A211562 SCHNEIDER, CAROL A MI1093 MI1193 A211563 SCHOOL DISTRICT K6 A211564 SCHUET7, KEITH A DATE : 12/1I/93 PAGE : I6 ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT FD DEPT OBJ ppj AMOUNT 67-1192-6360 11-3140-6340 2I-66006375 79-3182-6143 19-4140-6382-HZU 0I-3400-6370 0I-3400-6370 F38220 21-6600- 6222 00430I 63-9020-6740DENT 2,769.15 --------------- 2,769.25- 700.00 700.00 --------------- 85.25 85.25 30.00 30.00 124.95 ------- 124.95 --------------- 185.78 251.38 437.16 x 8,827.80 8,827.80 70.00 70.00 WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS OF : 12/11/93 INVOICE NUMBER ACCOUNT NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROD A211565 SCDSY, JERRY L A211566 SCOTT, DOREEN J MI1203 12693 A211567 SERVICE AMERICA CORP 073043 A211568 SERVICE AMERICA CORP 073044 A211569 SMITH, PAMELA N A211570 SPECKMAN, WALTER J A211571 SPRAGUE, DAVID M A211572 SYLVAN DALE RANCH 12393 1223 004300 DATE : 12/11/93 PAGE : 17 WARRANT AMOUNT 01-1041-6370 19-4170-6370-W 01-9020-6377 01-1061-6370-JANT 19-4170-6370-S 79-6950-6143 63-9020-6740-VISN 79-2420-6143 142.50 142.50 61.50 81.50 _-- __ 233.75 233.75 231.37 231.37 s s==== 170.00 170.00 _ 85.00 85.00 53.00 53.00 106.00 8381N 01-1123-6370 1,897.00 17897.00 WAP2OOP WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER A$ OF : 12/11/93 INVOICE NUMBER ACCOUNT NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROD DATE : 12/11/93 PAGE : 18 WARRANT AMOUNT A2I1573 TEACHERS SCHOOL SUPPLY LESS HANDLING LESS SHIPPING 007831 DISCOUNT FREIGHT HANDLING LESS SHIPPING 007831 007833 007834 007836 007837 007838 A211574 TETER, SARA J A211575 THUROW, ZANNA L A211576 TODDY'S A211577 TOTAL LAWN CARE 113093 I20193 12793 41 21-6600-6224 21-6600-6224 21-6600-6224 21-6600-6224 21-6600-6224 21-6600-6224 21-6600-6224 21-6600-6224 21-6600-6224 21-6600-6224 21-6600-6224 21-6600-6224 21-6600-6224 21-6600-6224 21-6600-6224 2146600-6224 1.58- 6.91 6.54- 17.95 5.89- 1.58- 6.91 36.51 8.57- 27.78 196.27 52.71 218.11 188.02 285.65 52.71 1.065.37 = s= 19-4170-6370-I 193.75 1941706370-Z 12.75 79-4411-6143 01-1011-6377 01-1061-6360 206.50 2.35 2.35 99.25 99.25 100.00 100.00 == WAP2OOP WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS OF : 12/11/93 INVOICE NUMBER ACCOUNT NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROD DATE : 12/11/93 PAGE : 19 WARRANT AMOUNT A211578 TOWN OF FREDERICK A211579 TOWN OF KEENESBURG A211580 TOWN OF NUNN A211581 TRI-AREA RUBBISH A211582 TRUJILLO. ADAM R A211583 UNC A21I584 UNICORN VENTURES 23621 34675 38264 383 570 011061-6341-MSF1 01-1061-6341-MSF2 01 -1061 -634I -LID 01-1061-6342-MSF1 0I-1061-6342-MSF2 01 -1061 -6342 -LIB 35.85 78.35 156.19 33.64 33.63 33.63 371.29 387670 01 -1061 -6340 -ROAD 17.00 113093 01 -1061 -6340 -ROAD NOV93 004302 3273 931105 21-6600-6340 63-9020-6740-VISN 21-6850-6222 52-5580-6322 17.00 23.00 ....... 23.00 58.00 58.00 ________ z 122.75 122.75 _ 16.209.20 16,209.20 90.00 90.00 SSs MAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS OF : 12/11/93 INVOICE NUMBER ACCOUNT NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROD DATE : 12/11/93 PAGE : 20 WARRANT AMOUNT A211585 UNION COLONY BANK A211586 UNITED POWER, INC. 011293 112393 19735 32330 46865 91104 A211587 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICES 511006 511013 511020 511027 77-5300-6610 77-5300-6620 01-1061-6341+SOCO 01-106I-6341-HSH 01 -1061 -6340 -ROAD 01 -1061 -6340 -ROAD OI-1061-6341-SOLD 01-1061-6225+CC 01 -I061 -6225 -CC 011061 -6225 -CC 02 -3062 -6225 -CC A211588 UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO 10346 21-6390-6381 2,169.91 1,430.09 3,600.00 22.37 79.13 43.32 16.84 408.70 570.36 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 6.00 360.00 360.00 x A211589 UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO AIKENREG1293 21-6450-6381 165.00 A211590 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 31(2845322 3K351301I 3K3513304 3K351.3327 31(3513358 31(3513375 67-1I92-6345-LD 67+1192-6345-LOCL 67-1192-6345-LOCL 67-1192-6345-LOCL 67 -1192 -6345 -LOLL 67-II92-6345-LOLL 67-1192-6345-LOCL 165.00 9.41 43.56 22.76 48.57 64.76 319.81 100.46 WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS OF : 12/11/93 INVOICE NUMBER ACCOUNT NUMBER FO DEPT OBJ PROJ DATE : 12/I1/93 PAGE : 21 WARRANT AMOUNT A211590 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 3K3513376 3K3513377 3K3523240 3K3523323 3K3523436 3K3523437 3K3523480 3K3523742 3K3523865 3K3523866 A211591 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 3K3524117 3K3524146 3K3524292 3K3524213 3K3524214 3K5340960 3K534I974 3K5344168 3K5354498 A211592 US WEST DIRECT A2I1593 VASQUEZ. DELIA 3K5872888 3K5874508 3K7372774 000174559000 000181197000 MI1193 67-1192-6345-tOCL 67 -1192 -6345 -LOGE 67 -1192 -6345 -LOGE 67-1192-6345-LOCL 67-1192-6345-LOCL 67 -1192 -6345 -LOLL 67 -1192 -6345 -LOGE 67 -1192 -6345 -LOLL 67 -1192 -6345 -LOLL 67 -1192 -6345 -LOCI 67-1192+6345-LOCL 67 -1192 -6345 -LOGE 671192-6345-LOCL 67-1192-6345+LOGE 67-1192-6345-LOCL 67 -1192 -6345 -LO 67 -1192 -6345 -LO 67.4192 -6345 -LO 67-1192-6345-LD 67 -1192 -6345 -LOLL 67-1192-6345-LD 67 -1192 -6345 -LOGE 67 -1192 -6345 -LO 67 -1192 -6345 -LOLL 67 -1192 -6345 -LO 67-1192-6345-LOCL 67-1192-6345-LOCL 67-1192-6345-LOCL 21-6600-6375 108.13 108.13 108.i3 69.10 108.13 108.13 278.72 213.81 22.76 22.76 1,757.13 69.10 319.92 39.16 31.32 31.32 175.72 I75.72 175.72 60.65 128.27 3.09 45.63 9.40 45.22 4.46 45.31 1,360.01 162.78 129.60 292.38 52.00 -52.06 WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS OF : 12/11/93 INVOICE NUMBER ACCOUNT NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROJ DATE : 12/11/93 PAGE 22 WARRANT AMOUNT A211594 VENZOR, LORRAINE A211595 VOLK, JOHN W., MD A211596 WAECHTER, OLGA L A211597 WARNER, MICHELE MI1193 004825 004305 MI1193 A211598 WELD COUNTY REVOLVING 10203 7696 7713 7725 7727 7731 7747 7750 7751 7755 A211599 WEST PUBLISHING COMPANY 69853 A211600 WESTERN TEMPORARY SVCS 217110 21-6600-6375 21-6600-6351 63 -9020 -6740 -DENT 37.50 37,50 ===== 20.00 20.00 72.50 72.50 21-6600-6375 36.87 36.87 ====== 01-1123-6370 21-6600-6377 2I-6920-6377 21-6600-6335 21-6600-6335 21-6600-6335 01-1012-6335 01-1151-6370 01-9020-6335 01-9020-6370 12.00 150.00 125,00 10.00 40.00 40.00 15.00 985.60 35.00 47.40 1,460.00 -=z=== 01+1123-6229 184.00 184.00 67-1192-6350 83.52 WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS OF : 12/11/93 INVOICE NUMBER ACCOUNT NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROJ DATE : 12/11/93 PAGE : 23 WARRANT AMOUNT 4211600 WESTERN TEMPORARY SVCS A211601 WESTLAW 11669 11669 69328 01-1012-6356 01-1123-6530 01-1012'6356 01-1123-6530 4211602 WIATROWSKI, STEPHEN J 12693 19-4170'6370-F 19-4170-6370-S 4211603 WINDSOR DEACON A211604 WORLD WATCH 014871 112993 4211605 YAMAGUCHI, JUDITH S. 111693 113093 A211606 ZAHOURECK, CAROL 01-1014-6331 19-4110-6333-MHW 01-I014-6370 01-1014-6370 83.52 == 1,498.23 582.37 629.90 275.11 ------- 2,985.61 96.50 40.50 I37.00 S 5= -= 49.63 ------- 49.63 15.00 15.00 5.50 24.25 29.75 92435 01-1123-6350 102.00 102.00 FINAL TOTAL : 84,456.77 = = s MAP200P WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS OF : 12/11/93 DATE : I2/11/93 PAGE : 24 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT ALL ACCOUNTING AND BUDGETING PRODECURES HAVE BEEN COMPLETED ON THE ABOVE LISTED CLAIMS AS SHOWN ON PAGE 1 THROUGH 23 • AND DATED 12/11/93, AND THAT PAYMENTS SHOULD BE TO THE RESPECTIVE VENDORS IN THE AMOUNTS SET OPPOSITE THEIR NAMES, WITH THE TOTAL AMOUNT DATED THIS ___L3,4 DAY DIRECTOR 19 _g3• A £ AND ADMINISTRATION SERVICES s_ e`t, 5 -- SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS ..-4.13/A- DAY OF _D- 19 y,• NX COMMISSION EXPIRCS.JAc1 1, 3yN MY COMM-ISSION EXPIRES: NOTARY PUBLIC WE, THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, HEREBY (APPROVE) (DISAPPROVE) THE CLAIMS AS SET FORTH ABOVE; AND WARRANTS IN PAYMENT THEREFORE py'ARE HEREBY ORDERED DRAWN UPON THE „- FUI_ ID TOTALING 1_4.5--c. � DATE QI THIS _, #DAY 1..C S OF '�""- 19__ 3 WELD COUNTY CLERK TO THE BOARD CHAIRMAN WAP2000 WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER MELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER A5 OF : 12/11/93 INVOICE NUMBER ACCOUNT NUMBER FD DEPT 08J PROJ DATE : 12/11/93 PAGE : 1 WARRANT AMOUNT 5858156 DORSEY, MELISSA 5858157 *CLERK OF THE COURT 5858158 *FAMILY SUPPORT DIVISION S858159 *5T LOUIS COUNTY 055 S858160 ANDRADE, CYNTHIA MAE S858161 ARAGON, EVE KATHERAINE 5858162 ARGUELLO, JUDY S858163 BENEDICT, JENNA M 12-0001-2030 12-0001-2085 120001-2085 12-00012085 I2-0001-2045 12-0001-2045 12.-0001a..2045 12-0001-2045 93.00 93.00 50.00 50.00 == 35.00 35.00 236,00 236.00 220.00 220,00 100.00 100.00 s= 50.00 50.00 165.00 165.00 WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS OF : 12/11/93 INVOICE NUMBER ACCOUNT NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROD DATE : 12/11/93 PAGE : 2 WARRANT AMOUNT 5858164 CERVANTES, MANUELA S858165 DOSEN. JACKLYN M 5858166 DRTINA, LINDA DARLENE S858167 GRONQUIST, SANDRA J 5858168 GUTIERREZ, DENISE MICHELL 5858169 HERNANDEZ, JUDY RAY 5858170 LARSON, LISA $858171 MERCER. PATTI KAYE 12-0001-2045 12-0002-2045 12-0001-2045 12-0001-2045 12-0001-2045 12-0001-2045 12-0001-2045 12-0001-2045 8.73 8.73 ==xaaa 115.00 115.00 -=xa==aaa a 199.50 199.50 t _====== 35.00 35.00 = 112.50 112.50 =x-- -a 177.00 177.00 142.00 I42.00 180.00 180.00 WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS OF : 12/12/93 INVOICE NUMBER ACCOUNT NUMBER FD DEPT 08J PROS DATE : 12/11/93 PAGE : 3 WARRANT AMOUNT 5858172 MORALES, GLORIA ISELA S858173 SALAS, LAURA 12-0001-2045 101.00 101.00 s� -=sss= 12-0001-2045 164.00 164.00 x FINAL TOTAL : 2,I83.73 s _a= WAP200P WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS OF : 12/1I/93 DATE : 12/12/93 PAGE : 4 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT ALL ACCOUNTING AND BUDGETING PRODECURES HAVE BEEN COMPLETED ON THE ABOVE LISTED CLAIMS AS SHOWN ON PAGE 1 THROUGH 3 , AND RESPECTIVE 12/11/939 AND THAT PAYMENTS SHOULD BE TO THE VENDORS IN THE AMOUNTS SET OPPOSITE THEIR NAMES, WITH THE TOTAL AM /g.3. 73 DATED THIS -12 1.. OUNT S --.•••••msgma••• 29 DIRECTOR 0 FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION SERVICES - SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS _-_/3 �'/'�/ DAY OF COMMISSION EXPIRES: mr commission NOTARY PUBLIC WE, THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, HEREBY (APPROVE) (DISAPPROVE) THE CLAIMS AS SET FORTH ABOVE; AND WARRANTS IN PAYMENT THEREFORE ARE HEREBY ORDERED DRAWN UPON THE DAT 0 THIS i 2A & DAY OF law FUND - TOTALING .24,44f23.%'-3 u4el. 19^% WELD COUNTY CLERK TO THE DoARD -_------___--- itelatal/ .1-(1-hlacj ----- MEMBER CHAIRMAN M DER MEMBER Reports and communications /03 e/%5•13 DPSBIB20 DESCRIPTION OF MESSAGE TN IN -BASKET Message....: THE FOLLOWING ROAD WAS OPENED DECEMBER 7, : DECEMBER 1, 1993 FOR A CULVERT REPLACEMENTr993 IT WAS CLOSED WCR 57 BETWEEN WCR 64.5 AND WCR 66 : MONA Received from.....: PENOTC02-MAIN Received..........: 12/07/93 08:57 Sent........: 12/07/93 08:57 Select an option and type it below; then press ENTER. 3 Send 8 Reply 9 File 10 Delete PF1=Help 2, PF7- 8= 9= 44Main Menu 54 _ 6 -Fast Path 10= 11= 12=Quit M mit '01131613 '---7 AN •ti „] MINUTES WELD COUNTY COUNCIL November 3. 1993 Tapes #16-93 & 17-93 LLI'., -"or- nn!-.". 1 ii:: ,Jv.... The Weld County Council met in regular session in full conformity with the Weld County Home Rule Charter at the Firestone Town Hall, 150 Buchanan Avenue, Firestone, Colorado, on Wednesday, November 3, 1993, at 7:30 p.m. ROLL CALL: The meeting was called to order by President Young, and the following members were present, constituting a quorum of the members thereof: President Young, Vice President Campbell, Councilman Gardner, Councilwoman Janda and Councilman Orr. Also present were John Pickle, Director of the Weld County Health Department; Rick Patterson, Mayor of Firestone and the Council secretary, ApiEDiati2Fsgra& Councilman Orr made a motion to approve the minutes of the October 6, 1993 meeting. Councilwoman Janda seconded the motion. Vote was taken and the motion carried unanimously. APPOINTMENTS: President Young noted the appointments listed and mentioned that he might be able to attend the Elected Officials' Meeting on November 8. 1993. Vice President Campbell agreed to represent the Council on KFKA'a Coffee Break radio show on November 16, 1993, from 9:00 a.m. until 11:00 a.m. ADDITIONS TO AGENDA: There were no additions to the agenda at this time. CORRESPONDENCE. The correspondence received was duly noted by President Young and was subsequently circulated among the Council members. Five additional copies of the amended Weld County Personnel Policy were requested by members. Weld County Council Minutes Page 2 November 3, 1993 PB PRES NTATION' RY iot PI Ls. Mr. Pickle gave an overview of the broad -based Weld County Health Department. including the areas of environmental protection. community health services. health education, vital records, assessment and data collecting, and prevention and policy setting. In addition to conducting prenatal programs. well -child clinics, clinics for the handicapped and family for at -risk populaial tions have beeams to n developed e attitudes 3He identified appropriate il gas behavior an important new issue faced by the Health Department. After an informal question and answer period during which Mr. Pickle addressed specific concerns of Council members and Mayor Patterson, President Young invited him to a future Council meeting in four to six months. REPORTS: COORDINATOR REPORTS Councilman On has been working with the Planning Department helping his clients with recorded exemptions and has discovered a number of cases where an $825 fee would be charged in order to correct something that was not done right to begin with. He added that planners may have felt that knowledge of all regulations is the responsibility of the landowner: thus, may not have properly explained the procedures and consequences. He has not yet had an opportunity to explore possible solutions to this apparent problem. Councilman Gardner is awaiting a return telephone call to confirm his appoiinityments with Sunnyvale. California, officials during his upcoming trip to OLD BUSINESS CORONER'S OFFICE FOLLOW-UP Vice President Campbell did not have a chance to follow up on this agenda item, but did reiterate his position that the Coroner's office is being run quite efficiently. NEW BUSINESS: PAYMENT OF THE BILLS Councilwoman Janda made a motion to. approve the payment of the bills. Vice President Campbell seconded the motion. Vote was taken and the motion weld County Council Minutes Page 3 November 3, 1993 carried unanimously. Mileage for Ralph Campbell Mileage for James Gardner Mileage for Barbara Janda Mileage for David Young Reimbursement for David Young Windsor Beacon subscription :renewal Windsor Beacon legal ad 511.00 $ 8.00 520.00 $28.00 $64.71 517.50 S 4.48 SECRETARIAL RESEARCH REQUESTS Vice President Campbell requested copies of the Coroner's office budget for the past four years. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Mayor Patterson thanked the Council for holding its meeting in Firestone. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 9:15 p.m. /)/x/93 Date Approved Alat 0O 1 -O_ I -Q � Sandra Nagel. Secretary_ d "`— Colorado: Proved Opp „zl/ GREELEY/WELD December 6, 1993 v n^ CLECK -0 -„CSf' Connie Harbert Weld County Commissioner P.O. Box 758 Greeley, CO 80632 Dear Commissioner Harbert, Our office has recently received a request from the City of Broomfield to extend the current boundaries of the Greeley/Weld Urban Enterprise Zone to include an area of approximately 700 acres located within the City of Broomfield and lying within the southwestern portion of Weld County (see attached map). The current boundary of the Erie zone is approximately 3.5 miles to the west and the Tri-Town zone is 3 miles to the north. This is the second request for an extension to this area. The first request came in late 1992 when Broomfield was competing for the new K -mart Distribution Center currently under construction in Brighton. They believe, and I agree, that in this specific case the Enterprise Zone factor is what tipped the scales in favor of the Brighton site. However, I stand behind my Board's decision to deny their request for extension. While it would have put Broomfield and Weld County in a much better competitive position in attracting K -Mart, it would have totally undermined the intent of the Enterprise Zone legislation. The intent was to give the more economically depressed areas of the state a competitive advantage. Extending the zone to the two other Colorado sites being considered by K -Mart would have been unfair to Brighton, who already had Enterprise Zone designation. It is my understanding that Broomfield's current request to extend the Enterprise Zone is not tied to any one company or project. I will be reviewing distress criteria for the area and discussing this request with the State Department of Local Affairs, City, of Greeley officials, neighboring Weld town officials, and residents in the general area. I would also appreciate your opinion on this request. Should you need any additional information, please feel free to contact me. Warm regards, C.i Cathy L. SBhulte Sr. Vice esident GREELEY/WELD ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT P O. Box S 810 9th Street Greeley, Colorado 80632 303/356-4565 Fax X3/352.2436 CC ' Ave Ems' Gf1 ; Se ; CAI 113/43 PROPOSED. ENTERPRISE ZONE EXTENSION PARCELS N 2 ADAMS COUNTY TLS NOVEMBER 1B. 1993 �.Y Cob.I r0 X35 • TO T sO, TD November 14, 1993 Board of Commissioners 915 10th Greeley, CO 80632 Dear County Commissioners, In regards to our wonderful gravel roads on the other end of Weld County...there is NONE. Three miles north on WCR 155 between 92 & 94. the road is on a slant. We've already had two semi trailers slide off this road. The first truck was from Idaho with a new $80,000 tractor and trailer. After he made it out, he didn't see the closed gate across the road and ran through it. There is a law about a gate across a county road. He was mad. There may be a lawsuit involved. I gave him numbers and names. The second truck from NW Transport (owner also owns the Rockies) almost upset his trailer on that road also. We had to pull him down through the ditch into the pasture as he had on $9,500 worth of doors and windows on. Someone is going to have to pay for that damage. There are no signs for any purpose and the intersection at WCR 155 and 92 is very bad. It is not straight and there are no directions. The only time you care about us out here is making sure we pay all our taxes; you don't ever seem to care about putting the tax money we pay into being of any help out here. I dare you to drive out here this week in a 2 -wheel drive new car and when you're stuck and mud -covered, the neighbor will pull you out and your new bumper or fenders will not look the same. We are human too out here and don't have asphalt all over like the city. We just ask for good gravel roads up to "county standards." It's not my fault the county inspector can't inspect all we're doing and if he does, he has to walk in for 1 1/2 miles. My family and I are trying to make a living and we've decided to build a place and try to create a good atmosphere for city folks as well as country people to enjoy; one that would be nice to spend the evening out on a peaceful prairie ranch and enjoy the wildlife and all the prairie has to offer. How can they do that when, if it rains or snows, they cannot even safely get there? The more we try to venture out and do something productive in this area ("make lemonade out of a lemon"), the more hassle we get. Where does it end? We would appreciate some gravel and 2 days of blade work between WCR 155 and 92 and 96. Sincerely, McConnell Bl! lfig O1 /3/9.3 ea; EG; dOCG • x :S r.s..1T, Y rei .gin, 2 ai V3 August 24. 1993 Board of Commissioners 915 10th Greeley, CO 80632 L! E K TO TKE Dear Connie Harbert and the Board of Commissioners. We are writing to you again in regards to the reopening of the WCR 155 between WCR 94 and 98. Like we mentioned in the last letter, we would pay for the last 3/4 miles of this road if you would bring the our part of mile south of it back up to county standards. We have just finished met Dick and he 3/4 George mile the to us George outthere and cwets discussedthe�road situation kand they can plainly see that this mile that I am asking you to bring up to standards has had the county road grader over it several times and at one time it was in the system. At the time this road was in the system, it was used by 8 - 10 families. Most of them moved away, but it has still been used often by 3 ranchers and farmers. Then it was taken off the system for several years. George's concern was the 2 cattle guards, one on each end. However. when I mentioned it to Gary Dollerschell of the Pawnee Grazing Asouth ssoc.. hin. We e said that the Forrest Service would most likely put the childrenestarting tould schooleto nextknow weekwhat is and manytruckloads of happening as we have supplies are coming in. This road is not used just for the MCConnells only. It will be used by the people of Weld County, Colorado, and many other states. This road will be of service to motorcycles, jeeps, cars and even large motor homes when we begin our Bed & Breakfast that will be connected with the Pawnee Pioneer Trails Scenic Byway. For now, we plan on having a home over there within 30 days and as you can well see, our tax dollars will be increased on that property many times over. Please let us know what your plans are to take care of this matter as it needs to be in place before the winter months. Sincerely. Craig M 'Connell ee. q r O d 0 0 I • s .20ie.1/4, zfc - 8/x / 3 l August 8, 1993 Board of Commissioners 915 10th Greeley, CO 80632 RE: WCR 155 Between WCR 94 X WCR 98 Dear Connie Harbert & Board of Commissioners: t 570, ty) /7 en. e/n�] '., w' UJ C ESX TO THE S3A ) We are writing to you again in regatta to reopening the above Weld County Road. After having an average wheat crop, we were able to install electricity to the barn, water well and home locations on our property. I have had 2 firms bid the road building job from the point where your maintainer now stops and turns around. The estimate for that 3/4 mile on to my home would cost me S2.700 -S3.200. The mile south of this is where your maintainer grades occasionally and this part of the road needs gravel. (It is that stretch 3 to 4 miles north of Highway 14 on Road 155, which you have the 60' right of way for.) I will plan to start at the beginning of the 4th mile, going halfway to compromise with you and pay my part, having it ditched and graveled. This is now a necessity for people coming off the highway for the Pawnee Pioneer Trails Scenic Byway Tours, children riding the school bus, and the mail route. If you want to cooperate, it is really no money out of your pocket, it comes from our tax dollars. If you don't want to cooperate and meet me halfway, why should I get permits for the barn, basement, home & RV parking? Also my taxes will drastically rise, which would more than compensate for several miles of road being built. By talking to neighbors and the county commissioner of Sterling, by rights „itwouldbe all your responsibility as you have maintained it in the past and you still have the right-of-way for this road project. If you won't cooperate this far with me. then I'll be forced to take this up with higher authorities. We will be starting to build within 2 weeks. Please respond as soon as possible. Sincerely, Craig'McConnell &c : Efr; t etc 4 42c d-'%i, 19.. 44*I; WII'Dc COLORADO December 3. 1993 Craig McConnell Road 1OO Stoneham, CO 8O654 Dear Mr. McConnell: Your request for gravel has WCR 96. been OFFICE OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS considered As soon as the weather permits and Department will gravel the one mile is on the Weld County road system. road. PHONE (303) 3564000, EXT. 4200 FAX (303) 352-0242 P.O. BOX 756 GREELEY, COLORADO 8O632 on WCR 155 between WCR 92 and trucks are available, the Road & Bridge on WCR 155 between WCR 92 and WCR 94 that The County will continue to maintain this If we can help you further, please don't hesitate Sincerely, BOARD OF WELD COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Constance L. Harbert Chairman CH/zw:mccon cc: George Goodell, Road & Bridge WCR 155, 92, 94 File to contact us. CB D8 BOARD ACTION: (Initial by Approval) Agree with Recommendation S% Worksession CH BK BW ROAD AND RESPONSE RECOMMENDED ACTION: Narrative: Method of Response: Board Action rksession Letter (Attached). Telephone Call. No Response 0 Cc w Z O M N H r 0 GJ lV M } .p. I— 0 CO 0 m 0)-I41 cJr�.o Y v` u -f>' 000- .. CJOOW -: CtO .41.1 ua QW . O*CC mx0.CD z z 7M OT 'JOB u.+ d do QM zW W 00 Zr WW H> Co I -z H I - 2O W IA WA N�y OLW W M (T 4 el cn GJ a mAI0' I-.= N2..1 O W22 1O QM N b W OO O J CO 0 -J AC OO O i •. OH F+W Y O OcQc I HVl OO O zoo 00 O WN I4 OO 0 }m WI - 2W 2O I- Q 0% i A r A A N N N O 0 O 0 0 0 .w N of N N C 2 a=n =CJ .C C W QJ in (i > C e.a X O0. Q4 -I w((IMA 2U 0 ,�� 21.4 II C o C; C.1 O i • • • Q H 9▪ � 0 2W X 'C) M 2 M *((ppN ..yj 4ti O ZQ V 1- WQON UN q I- _ O O J r. (A 1.4 00.4 HO O (7W 5 N O 20ow OZ 0 CC a. a WWMW OW O Z OW O JQMI N4 p 'KJ M Pit!' J 7.) a G(J W O Z OQ a *ZLLU *Cw r6 M QW. a *..w *... w0[ W • UW z *.Was *WW WW pp *flow )10-40c 00 *21P- two CO OW. w 71 ua_0 ) *SW zu. w M M M M M CA CP \ P P \ V V. M M •. \ \ • N \ .r .. .. ..r r .4 HEARING CERTIFICATION DOCKET NO. 93-87 RE: 1994 FINAL BUDGET HEARING A public hearing was conducted on December 8, 1993, at 9:00 A.M., with the following present: Commissioner Constance L. Harbert, Chairman Commissioner W. H. Webster, Pro-Tem Commissioner George E. Baxter Commissioner Dale K. Hall Commissioner Barbara J. Kirkmeyer Also present: Acting Clerk to the Board, Carol A. Harding County Attorney, Bruce Barker Director of Finance and Administration, Donald D. Warden The following business was transacted: I hereby certify that pursuant to a notice dated November 1. 1993, and duly published November 4, 1993. in the Windsor Beacon, a public hearing was conducted to consider the 1994 budget for Weld County. Donald D. Warden, Director of Finance and Administration, made this a matter of record. Commissioner Baxter moved to continue this matter to December 9, 1993, at 9:00 A.M. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Hall, and it carried unanimously. This Certification was approved on the 13th day of December, 1993. APPROVED: Weld County Clerk to pile Board By: eputy Clerk to the Boa TAPE #93-42 DOCKET #93-87 FI0017 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO J l -n -f +vif ,J Ie- onstance L. Ha Der ,"Chairman W.H %George/E. Bax er Dale K. Hall " i, Barbara J. Kirkmeyer 931257 HEARING CERTIFICATION DOCKET NO. 93-89 RE: WELD COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY 1994 FINAL BUDGET HEARING A public hearing was conducted on December 8, 1993, at 9:00 A.M., with the following present: Commissioner Constance L. Harbert, Chairman Commissioner W. H. Webster, Pro-Tem Commissioner George E. Baxter Commissioner Dale K. Hall Commissioner Barbara J. Kirkmeyer Also present: Acting Clerk to the Board, Carol A. Harding County Attorney, Bruce Barker Director of Finance and Administration. Donald D. Warden The following business was transacted: I hereby certify that pursuant to a notice dated November 8, 1993, and duly published November 25, 1993, in the Windsor Beacon, a public hearing was conducted to consider the 1994 budget for the Weld County Housing Authority. Donald D. Warden, Director of Finance and Administration, made this a matter of record. Commissioner Kirkmeyer moved to continue this matter to December 9, 1993, at 9:00 A.M. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Webster and it carried unanimously. This Certification was approved on the 13th day of December. 1993. APPROVED: ATTEST: Weld County Clerk to By: TAPE #93-42 DOCKET #93-89 HA0012 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Constance L. Harbert. Chairman v Barbara J. Kirkm 931258 HEARING CERTIFICATION DOCKET NO. 93-87 RE: 1994 FINAL BUDGET HEARING A public hearing was conducted on December 9, 1993, at 9:00 A.M., with the following present: Commissioner Constance L. Harbert, Chairman Commissioner W. H. Webster, Pro-Tem Commissioner George E. Baxter Commissioner Dale K. Hall Commissioner Barbara J. Kirkmeyer Also present: Acting Clerk to the Board, Carol A. Harding Director of Finance and Administration, Donald D. Warden The following business was transacted: I hereby certify that pursuant to a notice dated November 1, 1993, and duly published November 4, 1993, in the Windsor Beacon, a public hearing was conducted to consider the 1994 budget for Weld County. Donald D. Warden, Director of Finance and Administration, made this a matter of record and noted said hearing was continued from December 8, 1993. Mr. Warden stated the total 1994 budget for Weld County is $80,483,476, and presented a draft resolution summarizing expenditures and revenues for each fund and adopting the 1994 budget. No public testimony was given at this time. Commissioner Baxter moved to approve the draft resolution adopting the 1994 budget, as presented by staff. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Hall, and it carried, unanimously. Mr. Warden read the text of Emergency Ordinance No. 177, the 1994 appropriation ordinance. into the record. There being no public testimony, Commissioner Hall moved to approve said Ordinance No. 177 on an emergency basis. Commissioner Kirkmeyer seconded the motion, which carried unanimously. Mr. Warden discussed the parameters required by Amendment One and read the text of Emergency Ordinance No. 178, which establishes the mill levy for 1994. There was no public testimony given. Commissioner Kirkmeyer moved to approve Ordinance No. 178 on an emergency basis. Seconded by Commissioner Webster, the motion carried unanimously. This Certification was approved on the 13th day of December, 1993. ATTEST: Weld County Clerk to he Board By: eputy le to the Board TAPE #93-45 DOCKET #93-87 FI0017 APPROVED: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Constance L. Halbert, Chairman ebst er; P�Tetn . Bax.er Dale K. Hall arbara J. Kir er 931206 HEARING CERTIFICATION DOCKET NO. 93-82 RE: SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) PLAN, 1ST FILING, FORT JUNCTION PUD - THE VILLA AT GREELEY, INC., C/O JOHN T. COPPOM A public hearing was conducted on December 8, 1993, at 10:00 A.H., with the following present: Commissioner Constance L. Harbert, Chairman Commissioner W. H. Webster, Pro-Tem Commissioner George E. Baxter Commissioner Dale K. Hall Commissioner Barbara J. Kirkmeyer Also presents Acting Clerk to the Board, Shelly Miller Assistant County Attorney, Lee Morrison Planning Department representative, Keith Schuett The following business was transacted: I hereby certify that pursuant to a notice dated October 25, 1993, and duly published October 28, 1993, in the Windsor Beacon, a public hearing was conducted to consider the request of The Villa at Greeley, Inc., c/o John T. Coppom, for a Site Specific Development Plan and Planned Unit Development (PUD) Plan. 1st Filing, Fort Junction PUD. Lee Morrison, Assistant County Attorney, made this a matter of record. Chairman Harbert reviewed the Board of County Commissioners' Public Hearing Procedures for Land -Use Cases and the PUD Plan Criteria for Review in the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, Exhibit YYYYY. Keith Schuett, Planning Department representative, entered the unfavorable recommendation of the Planning Commission into the record as written. John Coppom, Principal and Administrator of The Villa at Greeley, Inc., stated he has a number of presenters as detailed in the Presentation Outline, Exhibit ZZZZZ. Mr. Coppom indicated Ed Kahn would not be present today, and Ann Garrison would not be present until 3:00 p.m. Mr. Coppom introduced the proposal by answering the questions of what the facility is, including the enabling legislation and Department of Corrections' RFP outlining expectations for a correctional rehabilitation facility to consist of 386 beds for minimum - restricted offenders and the purpose of its program; where the facility would be located, indicating it would be in the I-25 Mixed Use Development (MUD) District, an existing PUD District allowing for C-1, C-2, C-3, C-4, and 1-1 uses in the PUD Overlay District; and why this location was chosen as being compatible with adjacent land uses and infrastructure, accessible for transportation, good for hiring of staff, in a MUD area, and near to economic development, including 110 professional jobs and a tax -paying business. Loren Bley, Architect, explained the facility's architectural compatibility and integrity, landscaping, fencing, buffering, and the security of the building, which is analogous to a jail. He submitted facts warranting the approval of the Final Plan contained in Summary Contents, Exhibit AAAAAA, and a sample of the fencing material as Exhibit BBBBBB. Mr. Bley and Mr. Coppom answered various questions from the Board. Let the record reflect a recess was taken at this time. Upon reconvening, Mr. Coppom indicated it was necessary to rearrange the speakers. Vern Nelson, Engineer, spoke on the history of development in the Del Camino area and in this particular PUD District, drainage, minerals, traffic, and land values. Mr. Nelson reviewed the plat notes on 931249 CG: n RE: HEARING CERTIFICATION - THE VILLA AT GREELEY, INC. PAGE 2 the Change of Zone, which was approved in 1989 for this site, and stated the Weld County Sheriff has indicated the law enforcement authority, as required by plat note "A", is not needed. Dr. Spence Anneberg, Psychiatrist, presented testimony regarding facts versus fears of this type of facility and explained the prerelease center will serve the purpose of a rehabilitation center. Michael Brand, Corrections Director of The Villa at Greeley, Inc., briefed the Board on his background and indicated Tom Waters, Colorado Department of Corrections, and Chuck Boise and Fire Chief Gerald Ward, Mountain View Fire Protection District, were available to answer questions. Mr. Brand then introduced Libby Glass, W.W. Reynolds and Company, who explained the development of East Prospect Business Park, which is adjacent to the Larimer County Detention Center. She stressed the compatibility, safety, stability of land values, and the development of industrial parks surrounding the Larimer County Detention Center and Boulder County Jail. Ms. Class submitted several photographs, Exhibit CCCCCC, for the record and indicated correctional facilities are a non -issue in the community. Mr. Brand presented information concerning the intent and components of the rehabilitative program, compliance with Weld County's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance, compatibility, safety, and Ann Garrison's research on positive land values. Mr. Brand answered various questions from the Board concerning law enforcement, emergency response issues, security, and the minimum -stay time for offenders. Mr. Waters indicated the State would most likely require a 90 - day minimum stay and explained the classification system which is based on certain criteria. He further stated the standard re -offending rates have dropped with the use of similar programs. Mr. Waters also indicated the cost would prohibit the facility from changing levels in the future. (Changed to Tape #93-43.) Mr. Coppom indicated bonds are required to insure minimum -risk facilities stay at that level Let the record reflect a recess was taken at this time. Let the record also reflect, upon reconvening, Bruce Barker, County Attorney, was the attorney of record. Ron Hiatt, businessman in the Del Camino area, presented positive aspects of various similar facilities. Mr. Hiatt submitted, as Exhibit DDDDDD for the record, a prepared statement and two pages of signatures of business owners/managers in the area supporting the proposed facility. Mr. Coppom indicated the conclusion of the Villa's presentation; however, he requested Ann Garrison be allowed to speak upon her arrival. Joe Tennesson, KFKA; Dennis Kane, Windsor Town Board; J.V. Teague; Vickia Hays; Bill Meier, South West Weld Economic Development Group; Joe Cox; Marvin Dyer, Dyer Realty; Harry Asmus, Greeley businessman and partner with Mr. Coppom and Mr. Brand in the Villa; and Deanna Holmes, psychotherapist and rape crisis counselor, all spoke in support of the proposed facility. Gerald E. Dahl, Attorney representing Concerned Citizens of Southwest Weld County (CCSWC), presented various legal and factual reasons for denial as outlined in Exhibit EEEEEE. He also submitted a map, Exhibit FFFFFF, indicating in blue the property owners opposed to the facility, and he referred to the Witness List of the CCSWC, Exhibit VVVVV in the record, and stated the opposition o Morrisonis now r the lattorney of record.) Mr. (Let D hltherans answered lvarious questions from the Board. Dennis Tomline of Specialty Products Company, Kathy Neiley, Conrad Hopp, Diane Aitts, Jan England, and Frank Canape, all members of CCSWC, spoke in opposition to the proposed facility. Ms. Neiley presented Exhibits GGGGGG through MMMMMM, Ms. England submitted Exhibit NNNNNN, and Mr. Canapa submitted Exhibits 000000 and PPPPPP for the record. (Changed to Tape #93-44 during Mr. Canapa's presentation.) Let the record reflect a recess was taken after Mr. Hopp's testimony. Dave Schwind of Prudential Realtors, Sandy Ingram of CRASH (Citizens Rebelling Against Safety Hazards), Wendy Hofmann, Al Roberts, June Gordon, 931249 RE: HEARING CERTIFICATION - THE VILLA AT'GREELEY. INC. PAGE 3 Virginia Scheel, Marvin (M.D.) Hopper. Kathy Oliver, Chris Wagner. Larry Abbott. Doris Huffaker, and Paula DePaiva all spoke in oppositiionto the proposed facility. M.D. Hopper submitted Exhibit QQQQQQ for the record. Let the record reflect a five-minute recess was taken at this time. Upon reconvening, Arthur Roy. Attorney representing the Villa, rebutted the legal and factual issues raised. Mr. Coppom clarified various issues and reiterated compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Ordinance and the facility's compatibility with adjacent uses. Mr. Coppom and Mr. Brand answered further questions from the Board. Gerald Ward. Fire Chief of the Mountain View Fire Protection District, also answered questions from the Board and indicated the proposed facility was not a concern. After further discussion. Mr. Schuett explained staff had reviewed the application and requirements for a PUD and determined the proposed facility to be a use allowed in the PUD, which was presented to the Planning Commission in October of 1993. He further explained the reasons for the determination and read the resolution into the record. Mr. Schuett, Mr. Morrison, and Mr. Brand answered questions from the Board concerning allowed uses, formation of a law enforcement authority, the Planning Commission's motion. class or level of inmates, time frames associated with minimum stay, transferability of the permit, the comprehensive emergency plan, and creation of a community advisory board. (Changed to Tape 893-45 during discussion.) Commissioner Webster stated a need exists for this type of facility to assist offenders' entry back into society with education and training. He indicated the location is compatible to southern Weld County and the infrastructure exists. Commissioner Webster said he hoped the facility would not be the great deterrent as feared, and he moved to approve the request of The Villa at Greeley. Inc.. c/o John T. Coppom, for a Site Specific Development Plan and Planned Unit Development (PUD) Plan, 1st Filing, Fort Junction PUD, based on the recommendation of the Planning staff, with the Conditions of Approval as entered into the record with the following additions: Condition of Approval 82a - "The uses permitted within the PUD Plan shall be a Class 2, minimum -restriction facility. or a Class 1. minimum -restriction facility, ..."; Condition of Approval 82u - "A community liaison board consisting of members of the neighborhood to deal with issues of the operation impacting the neighborhood shall be created. Said board shall report at least annually to the Board of Commissioners."; and Condition of Approval #2v - "A law enforcement authority shall be formed according to State law. The law enforcement authority to be formed shall be capable of expanding to serve other areas within the 1-25 Mixed Use Development Area to avoid duplication of overhead and other operating costs." After further discussion, Commissioner Baxter stated he feels the facility satisfies the criteria and explained his reasons. After further comments. Commissioner Baxter seconded the motion based on the staff's recommendation and the facts presented today. Commissioner Kirkmeyer noted the consistency with the Comprehensive Plan which allows all levels of commercial uses and also indicated she agrees with staff that the criteria has been met; therefore, she would vote in favor of the motion. Chairman Harbert also agreed with the consistency of the Comprehensive Plan and Commissioner Kirkmeyer's comments. She stated she felt the PUD conforms to the District and the use is substantiated by the Zoning Ordinance; therefore, she would also vote in favor of the motion. On a roll -call vote, the motion carried unanimously. 931249 RE: HEARING CERTIFICATION - THE VILLA AT GREELEY, INC. PAGE 4 This Certification was approved on the 13th day of December, 1993. APPROVED: ATTEST: Weld County Clerk to the Board By: \ - 1i Deputy erk to the Board k TAPE #93-42 through #93-45 DOCKET #93-82 PL0100 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO 931249 HEARING CERTIFICATION DOCKET NO. 93-89 RE: WELD COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY 1994 FINAL BUDGET HEARING A public hearing was conducted on December 9, 1993, at 9:00 A.M., with the following present: Commissioner Constance L. Harbert, Chairman Commissioner W. H. Webster, Pro-Tem Commissioner George E. Baxter Commissioner Dale K. Hall Commissioner Barbara J. Kirkmeyer Also present: Acting Clerk to the Board, Carol A. Harding Director of Finance and Administration, Donald D. Warden The following business was transacted: I hereby certify that pursuant to a notice dated November 8, 1993, and duly published November 25, 1993, in the Windsor Beacon, a public hearing was conducted to consider the 1994 budget for the Weld County Housing Authority. Donald D. Warden, Director of Finance and Administration, made this a matter of record and noted said hearing was continued from December 8, 1993. Mr. Warden stated the total 1994 budget for the Weld County Housing Authority is $2,280,997, and presented a draft resolution summarizing expenditures and revenues for each fund and adopting the 1994 budget. No public testimony was given at this time. Commissioner Webster moved to approve the draft resolution adopting the 1994 budget, as presented by staff. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Baxter, and it carried unanimously. Mr. Warden presented a draft resolution appropriating sums to the various funds and budget units. There being no public testimony, Commissioner Baxter moved to approve said draft resolution. Commissioner Hall seconded the motion, which carried unanimously. This Certification was approved on the 13th day of December. 1993. ATTEST Weld County Clerk to By: Deputy TAPE #93-45 DOCKET #93-89 HA0012 le k to the Board he Board l APPROVED: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Constance L. Harbert, C airman Barbara J. Kirkme cc : f1A 931246 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS MINUTES BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO DECEMBER 13, 1993 TAPE #93-45 The Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, met in regular session in full conformity with the law and bylaws of said Board at the regular place of meeting in the Weld County Centennial Center, Greeley, Colorado, December 13, 1993, at the hour of 9:00 A.M. ROLL CALL: MINUTES: CERTIFICATIONS OF HEARINGS: ADDITIONS: CONSENT AGENDA: COMMISSIONER COORDINATOR REPORTS: PUBLIC INPUT: WARRANTS: The meeting was called to order by the Chairman and on roll call the following members were present, constituting a quorum of the members thereof: Commissioner Constance L. Harbert, Chairman Commissioner W. H. Webster, Pro-Tem Commissioner George E. Baxter Commissioner Dale K. Hall Commissioner Barbara J. Kirkmeyer Also present: Weld County Attorney, Bruce T. Barker Acting Clerk to the Board, Carol Harding Finance and Administration Director, Don Warden Commissioner Hall moved to approve the minutes of the Board of County Commissioners meeting of December 8, 1993, as printed. Commissioner Kirkmeyer seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. Commissioner Baxter moved to approve the hearings conducted on December 8, 1993, as follows: 1) Final Budget Hearing; 2) Housing Authority Budget Hearing; and 3) Planned Unit Development Plan (PUD), 1st Filing, Fort Junction PUD, The Villa at Greeley, Inc.; and hearings conducted on December 9, 1993, as follows: 1) Final Budget Hearing; and 2) Housing Authority Budget Hearing. Commissioner Webster seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. There were no additions to today's agenda. Commissioner Kirkmeyer moved to approve the consent agenda as printed. Commissioner Hall seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. There were no reports given. There was no public input. Don Warden, Director of Finance and Administration, presented the following warrants for approval by the Board: General Fund $ 162,506.54 Handwritten warrants: Payroll Fund $ 210,709.75 Commissioner Kirkmeyer moved to approve the warrants as presented by Mr. Warden. Commissioner Baxter seconded the motion, which carried unanimously. BUSINESS: NEW: CONSIDER RENEWAL OF TAVERN LIQUOR LICENSE, WITH EXTENDED HOURS, FOR HELEN AND ISAURO CHAVEZ, DBA EL ROJO LOUNGE. AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN: Bruce Barker, County Attorney, stated the application is complete. Chairman Harbert reviewed a report received from the Communications Center showing a number of responses and criminal complaints at said tavern and personally concerning Helen Chavez. After discussion, Commissioner Kirkmeyer moved to find there is sufficient cause to hold a renewal hearing for the renewal of said license on January 12, 1994, at 9:00 a.m. Seconded by Commissioner Hall, the motion carried unanimously. The Clerk was asked to confirm the attendance of a Sheriff's Deputy at that hearing to answer questions concerning the report. CONSIDER 1994 DANCE LICENSE FOR HELEN AND ISAURO CHAVEZ, DBA EL ROJO LOUNGE: Commissioner Kirkmeyer moved to continue this matter to January 12, 1994, at 9:00 a.m. Seconded by Commissioner Webster, the motion carried unanimously. CONSIDER 1994 DANCE LICENSE FOR EATON COUNTRY CLUB: Mr. Barker stated the application adheres to the County's ordinance regarding annual dance licensing requirements. Commissioner Hall moved to approve said license. Seconded by Commissioner Kirkmeyer, the motion carried unanimously. CONSIDER AGREEMENT FOR REHABILITATION SERVICES BETWEEN FENWC AND NORTH COLORADO MEDICAL CENTER, INC. AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN: Walt Speckman, Director of Human Resources, stated this is a change from the past; however, the bid process was followed. The scope of services includes on -site speech and language services to Head Start eligible students for up to 802 hours. A maximum of $31,080 will be reimbursed for the term, which is in effect from December 13, 1993, through September 30, 1994. Commissioner Webster moved to approve said agreement and authorize the Chairman to sign. Seconded by Commissioner Kirkmeyer, the motion carried unanimously. CONSIDER SINGLE ENTRY POINT CONTRACT BETWEEN COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES AND AREA AGENCY ON AGING AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN: Mr. Speckman presented said contract which allows the Area Agency on Aging to become the Single Point of Entry for long-term care services in Weld County. Home and Community Based Services, Home Care Allowance, Adult Foster Care, and Certification for Nursing Home Placement Programs will be consolidated. The term of said contract is February 16, 1994, through June 30, 1994, and the amount is $58,897. Commissioner Baxter moved to approve said contract and authorize the Chairman to sign. Seconded by Commissioner Webster, the motion carried unanimously. CONSIDER PURCHASE OF SERVICE AGREEMENT BETWEEN FENWC AND SJB CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS, INC. AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN: Mr. Speckman said this agreement is with SJB Child Development Centers, Inc., aka ABC Child Development Centers, in response to the Head Start bid process. SJB will be reimbursed a maximum of $36,400 to provide enhanced preschool learning opportunities for 20 eligible Head Start children, as well as facilitate their transition into kindergarten. The term of said agreement is December 1, 1993, through November 30, 1994. Commissioner Webster moved to approve said agreement and authorize the Chairman to sign. Seconded by Commissioner Hall, the motion carried unanimously. Minutes - December 13, 1993 Page 2 CONSIDER CONTRACT WITH COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH FOR FEASIBILITY STUDY - 49TH STREET AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN: John Pickle, Health Department Director, reviewed the contract to fund the feasibility study for the 49th Street sewage disposal problem. The contractor has completed the study and is awaiting payment on the project. Commissioner Kirkmeyer moved to approve said contract and authorize the Chairman to sign. Seconded by Commissioner Hall, the motion carried unanimously. CONSIDER TEN AGREEMENTS FOR SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS OF POLLUTANT DISCHARGE WITH VARIOUS ENTITIES AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN: Mr. Pickle presented ten agreements with various entities for the year 1994. Commissioner Baxter moved to approve said agreements and authorize the Chairman to sign. Seconded by Commissioner Webster, the motion carried unanimously. CONSIDER TWENTY-TWO AGREEMENTS FOR SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS OF DRINKING WATER WITH VARIOUS ENTITIES AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN: Mr. Pickle presented twenty-two drinking water agreements for the year 1994. Commissioner Webster moved to approve said agreements and authorize the Chairman to sign. Seconded by Commissioner Kirkmeyer, the motion carried unanimously. CONSIDER OIL AND GAS DIVISION ORDER WITH ELK EXPLORATION, INC., AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN: Mr. Barker stated he has verified the percentages listed on said Division Order, and they are correctly listed. Commissioner Hall moved to approve said Division Order and authorize the Chairman to sign. Seconded by Commissioner Kirkmeyer, the motion carried unanimously. CONSIDER CANCELLATION OF PAYROLL WARRANTS FOR JULY, AUGUST, SEPTEMBER, OCTOBER, AND NOVEMBER OF 1993: Commissioner Hall moved to approve said cancellations. Seconded by Commissioner Baxter, the motion carried unanimously. EMERGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 174-B, IN MATTER OF A SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION FOR 1993: Mr. Warden explained the changes necessitating this supplemental appropriation, which is the second one for 1993, and read the text of said Ordinance. There was no public input offered. Commissioner Baxter moved to approve Ordinance No. 174-B on an emergency basis. Seconded by Commissioner Hall, the motion carried unanimously. PLANNING: CONSIDER ZPMH #1873 - MARTINEZ (CONT. FROM 11/24/93): Chairman Harbert stated the three ZPMH's for Vincente Martinez will be considered together, since the properties are adjacent to each other. Monica Daniels -Mika, Department of Planning Services, explained staff contacted the water district and there is a representative present today. The tap permits were issued in error, and there is no water available for the three lots. Ms. Daniels -Mika also stated staff is still receiving a large number of complaints regarding this request. Mary Gealfos, Secretary of Aristocrat Ranchettes Water Project, Inc., stated she checked through four different methods and determined there are no water taps available for this property. She said there is a moratorium on water taps and there are none available. Ms. Gealfos stated the certificates for these three parcels are signed by her; however, they were done in error since no water taps exist. In response to Commissioner Kirkmeyer, Ms. Gealfos said other properties in the area are using cisterns. Mr. Martinez stated he was told by the water district that the water was available, and he was issued the certificates when he applied. If water is not available for the three lots, Mr. Martinez requests approval of cisterns to be used on each lot. Ms. Daniels -Mika stated there are temporary cistern permits available from the Health Department for Aristocrat Acres. She stated the word temporary correlates to the use, not the length Minutes - December 13, 1993 Page 3 of time it is in effect. In response to Commissioner Hall, Ms. Gealfos stated the water district is trying to buy water from the City of Fort Lupton; however, it has not been able to solidify the deal. Mr. Martinez responded to Commissioner Baxter saying it will cost approximately $1,500 for him to put each cistern in, plus 25e per 100 gallons of water. Donald Clamp, surrounding landowner, reiterated his concerns regarding use of the properties as rentals, and the weeds and trash, including abandoned vehicles that have always accumulated on these properties. Mr. Martinez stated the cars have been moved. Donna Adams, surrounding property owner, stated she feels there are health risks created by adding three other cisterns in the area. She also complained about grass 12" to 18" high at all times on these properties. In response to questions from the Board, Mr. Barker clarified that the Board is not in a position to rely on the signatures on the petitions and they have, in fact, gone past that. Mr. Barker stated the case should be decided on its own merits, and issues of who signed the petition or the visibility of other lots owned by Mr. Martinez should not have anything to do with the decision, since he was not issued proper notice of any violations. Commissioner Kirkmeyer requested Ms. Daniels -Mika review staff's comments from the November 24, 1993, meeting and pointed out the letter from the Fort Lupton Planning Commission indicating it did not support this application. Commissioner Hall moved to deny ZPMH #1873 based on the findings of inadequate water supply and the letter received from the Fort Lupton Planning Commission indicating it does not support approval. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Kirkmeyer, who agreed with Commissioner Hall's reasons, as well as stating cisterns provide temporary relief only, and do not solve the problem. On roll call vote, the motion carried unanimously. CONSIDER ZPMH #1874 - MARTINEZ (CONT. FROM 11/24/93): Commissioner Hall moved to deny ZPMH #1874 for the same reasons listed for ZPMH #1873. Seconded by Commissioner Baxter, the motion carried unanimously. CONSIDER ZPMH #1875 - MARTINEZ (CONT. FROM 11/24/93): Commissioner Hall moved to deny ZPMH #1875 for the same reasons listed for ZPMH #1873. Seconded by Commissioner Baxter, the motion carried unanimously. CONSIDER ZPMH #1881 - CAMPBELL: Ms. Daniels -Mika explained said request is for a mobile home in which a Weld County grader operator will live, located on a state right-of-way. She said the State has given its concurrence by letter. Dave Becker, Assistant Road and Bridge Director, explained this request is necessary because of the retirement of Harold Weisbrook. He said there is a well permit. Zelma Wahl, Road and Bridge Department, explained the State has the whole section leased to Mr. Weisbrook on a 100 -year lease. However, they have given the County permission to use the right-of-way for placement of a mobile home. There was no public input given concerning this matter. Commissioner Kirkmeyer moved to approve ZPMH #1881. Seconded by Commissioner Baxter, the motion carried unanimously. CONSIDER RESOLUTION RE: VIOLATIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE - ROJAS, GONZALES, AND GARCIA: Commissioner Kirkmeyer moved to approve this Resolution authorizing the County Attorney to proceed with legal action against Theodore Anthony Rojas, Joe R. Gonzales, Jr., and Pete Garcia for violations of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. Commissioner Hall seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. RESOLUTIONS AND Minutes - December 13, 1993 Page 4 ORDINANCES: ATTEST: The Resolutions were presented and signed as listed on the consent agenda. Emergency Ordinance No. 174-B was approved today. Emergency Ordinances No. 177 and No. 178 were approved during the budget hearing on December 9, 1993. All Resolutions approved during said budget hearing are listed on today's consent agenda. Let the minutes reflect that the above and foregoing actions were attested to and respectfully submitted by the Acting Clerk to the Board. There being no further business, this meeting was adjourned at 10:00 A.M. Weld County Clerk to the Board By: Deputy C1• to the Board APPROVED: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WEE COUNTY, COLORADO Barbara J. Kirkm- er Minutes - December 13, 1993 Page 5 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS MINUTES BOARD OF SOCIAL SERVICES WELD COUNTY, COLORADO DECEMBER 13, 1993 TAPE #93-45 ROLL CALL: MINUTES: WARRANTS: ATTEST: The Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, met in regular session as the Board of Social Services in full conformity with the law and bylaws of said Board at the regular place of meeting in the Weld County Centennial Center, Greeley. Colorado, December 13, 1993, at the hour of 9:00 A.M. The meeting was called to order by the Chairman and on roll call the following members were present, constituting a quorum of the members thereof: Commissioner Constance L. Harbert, Chairman Commissioner W. H. Webster, Pro-Tem Commissioner George E. Baxter Commissioner Dale K. Hall Commissioner Barbara J. Kirkmeyer Also present: Weld County Attorney. Bruce T. Barker Acting Clerk to the Board, Carol Harding Commissioner Baxter moved to approve the minutes of the Board of Social Services meeting of December 8, 1993, as printed. Commissioner Kirkmeyer seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. Carol Harding, Finance and Administration, presented the warrants for approval by the Board in the amount of $55,038.60. Commissioner Webster moved to approve the warrants as presented by Ms. Harding. Commissioner Hall seconded the motion, which carried unanimously. Let the minutes reflect that the above and foregoing actions were attested to and respectfully submitted by the Acting Clerk to the Board. There being no further business, this meeting was adjourned at 10:05 A.M. Weld County Clerk to the Board By: Deputy Clerk to APPROVED: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COU-NTY,COLORADO / Constance L. Harbert, Chairman 7-Te;i Dal Ar A. xall 1/1.enzdrui aJ. ey RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AGENDA TAPE #93-46 Wednesday. December 15. 1993 ROLL CALL: Constance L. Harbert, Chairman w. H. Webster, Pro-Tem George E. Baxter Dale K. Hall Barbara J. Kirkmeyer MINUTES: Approval of minutes of December 13, 1993 ADDITIONS TO AGENDA: APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA: PRESENTATIONS: 1) Recognition of Services - Tom Cope. Boardf Emergency cHealth MHealtl 2) Recognition of Services - Mary Services Advisory Council - Nomie Ketterling. Juvenile 3) Recognition of Services Community Review Board 4) Recognition of Services - Carolyn Olson. Juvenile Community Review Board time PUBLIC INPUT: (Each individual is allowed a three -minute period not obe able which to speak. Please be aware that the Board may to address your topic today; however, if they are unable to do so, the matter will either be referred to staff or scheduled for a future date. If you wish to speak regarding issues whwhribchaare likely to be heard by the Board ina public l hearing,asked to give uas a land use or violation hearing, you testimony at that hearing, either in person or in writing.) COUNTY FINANCE OFFICER: BIDS: BUSINESS: NEW: PLANNING: 1) Warrants 1) Present Haworth Systems furniture and shelving bid - Social Services 2) Present milk bid - Sheriff's Department 1) Consider Job Training Plan Modification and.Employment Servicesrand Governor's Job Training Office authorize Chairman to sign 2) Consider Resolution re: Establish Reserves in Fiscal Year 1993 in Compliance with Amendment One (TABOR) 3) Consider Resolution re: Establish Emergency Reserve in Fiscal Year 1993 in Compliance with Amendment One (TABOR) 4) Consider Resolution re: Setting the Amount of Compensation for Election Judges and Branch Registrars 1) Consider Resolution re: Building Code Violations - Snyder Oil Corporation 2) Consider Site Application for improvements to existing wastewater treatment facility - Town of Windsor 3) Consider RE #1561 - Rider SOCIAL SERVICES BOARD: ROLL CALL: Constance L. Harbert, Chairman W. H. Webster, Pro-Tem George E. Baxter Dale K. Ha:.l Barbara J. Kirkmeyer MINUTES: Approval of minutes of December 13, 1993 WARRANTS: Don Warden, County Finance Officer CONSENT AGENDA APPOINTMENTS: Dec 15 - EDAP Dec 16 - Airport Authority Dec 16 - 208 Water Quality Dec 20 - Work Session Dec 20 - NCMC Board of Trustees Dec 20 - Chamber of Commerce Board Dec 21 - E911 Telephone Authority Dec 21 - Planning Commission Dec 23 - HOLIDAY Dec 24 - HOLIDAY Dec 31 - HOLIDAY HEARINGS: Dec 15 - Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) to PUD (Planned Unit Development), David and Kayleen Hunt, c/o Brian Grubb (cont. from 11/17/93) Dec 15 - Planned Unit Development Final Plan, David and Kayleen Hunt, c/o Brian Grubb (cont. from 11/17/93) Dec 29 - Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) to E (Estate), William and Charles Jerke Jan 5 - Closure/Post-Closure Plan for Central Weld/Greeley-Miliken Landfill, Waste Services Corporation (cont. from 10/13/93) Jan 10 - Show Cause Hearing to consider revocation of USR #540, Northern Colorado Brine, c/o Mike Cervi (cont. from 11/17/93) Jan 12 - Hearing to consider renewal of Tavern Liquor License, with extended hours, for Helen and Isauro Chavez, dba El Rojo Lounge Mar 2 - Show Cause Hearing, Judy Oakley (cont. from 09/22/93) May 2 - Annual Meeting of Windsor Shores Law Enforcement Authority May 2 - Annual Meeting of Antelope Hills Law Enforcement Authority May 2 - Annual Meeting of Beebe Draw Law Enforcement Authority PLANNING STAFF APPROVALS: 1) RE #1567 - Arnold 2) ZPMH #1884 - Hart RESOLUTIONS: 7:00 PM 3:00 PM 7:00 PM 10:00 AM 12:00 PM 12:00 PM 12:00 PM 1:30 PM 10:00 AM 10:00 AM 10:00 AM 10:00 AM 10:00 AM 9:00 AM 10:00 AM 9:00 AM 9:00 AM 9:00 AM * 1) Action of Board concerning renewal of Tavern Liquor License, with extended hours, for Helen and Isauro Chavez, dba El Rojo Lounge * 2) Action of Board concerning 1994 Dance License for Helen and Isauro Chavez, dba El Rojo Lounge * 3) Approve 1994 Dance License for Eaton Country Club * 4) Approve Agreement for Rehabilitation Services between FENWC and North Colorado Medical Center, Inc. * 5) Approve. Single Entry Point Contract between Colorado Department of Social Services and Area Agency on Aging Continued on Page 2 of Consent Agenda Wednesday, December 15, 1993 Page 2 of Consent Agenda RESOLUTIONS: (CONT.) PRESENTATIONS: * 6) Approve Purchase of Service Agreement between FENWC and SJB Child Development Centers, Inc. * 7) Approve Contract with Colorado Department of Health for Feasibility Study - 49th Street * 8) Approve Oil and Gas Division Order with Elk Exploration, Inc. * 9) Approve cancellation of Payroll Warrants for July, August, September, October, and November of 1993 *10) Deny ZPMH #1873 - Martinez *11) Deny ZPMH #1874 - Martinez *12) Deny ZPMH #1875 - Martinez *13) Approve ZPMH #1881 - Campbell *14) Authorize County Attorney to proceed with legal action for Zoning Violation - Rojas, Gonzales, and Garcia * 1) Recognition of Services - * 2) Recognition of Services - Advisory Council * 3) Recognition of Services - Review Board * 4) Recognition of Services Review Board * Signed this date Tom Cope, Board of Public Health Mary Mast. Emergency Medical Services Nomie Ketterling, Juvenile Community - Carolyn Olson, Juvenile Community Wednesday. December 15, 1993 RESOLUTION RE: ACTION OF BOARD CONCERNING RENEWAL OF TAVERN LIQUOR LICENSE, WITH EXTENDED HOURS, FOR HELEN AND ISAURO CHAVEZ, DBA EL ROJO LOUNGE WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners, as the local liquor licensing authority for Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to §12-47-106(1)(b), CRS, and Weld County Ordinance No. 102-A, may cause a hearing to be held on the application for renewal of any liquor license previously issued by it, and WHEREAS, Helen and Isauro Chavez, dba El Rojo Lounge, holds a Tavern Liquor License, with extended hours, to sell malt, vinous, and spirituous liquors, by the drink for consumption on the premises only, said license was approved by the Board and expires February 23, 1994, and WHEREAS, the Board did receive information from the Greeley/Weld Communications Center regarding the existence of certain factors stated in Ordinance No. 102-A and concerning El Rojo Lounge, 3101 Highway 119, Longmont, Colorado 80501-9543, and WHEREAS, at a public Board meeting on December 13, 1993, and pursuant to the hereinabove stated Liquor Code and/or Ordinance, the Board deems it advisable to schedule a renewal hearing for Helen and Isauro Chavez, dba El Rojo Lounge, because the Board has probable cause to believe the following factors exist: 1. Numerous criminal complaints within the establishment and concerning Ms. Chavez, as listed in the attached Exhibit "A". NOW, THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that a renewal hearing concerning the Tavern Liquor License, with extended hours, issued to Helen and Isauro Chavez, dba El Rojo Lounge, shall be held on January 12, 1994, at the hour of 9:00 a.m. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that Helen and Isauro Chavez, licensees, shall post the premises advising of said hearing at least ten days in advance of the hearing. 931270 de. ; ,541 APPL., fide RE: SET RENEWAL HEARING FOR TAVERN LIQUOR LICENSE - EL ROJO LOUNGE PAGE 2 The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 13th day of December, A.D., 1993. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELDS COUNTY. COLORADO ATTEST: Weld County C APPROVED AS TO FORM: County Attorney Constance L Herbert,. Chairman ebster, P -Tem I George,. Baxte -F �G .&1IQ 'D Daly K. Hall /L[1/cti J. • - it a yer arbara 931270 RESOLUTION RE: ACTION OF BOARD CONCERNING 1994 DANCE LICENSE FOR HELEN AND ISAURO CHAVEZ, DBA EL ROJO LOUNGE WHEREpursuant toS. the Board of CommissionersWeld County,Colorado statute and he We dCounty Home RuleCharter, islvesteoradod with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board has been presented with an application for a County Dance License to hold public dances at the location described as follows: 3101 Highway 119, Longmont, Colorado 80504 WHEREAS, said applicant has paid to Weld County the sum of TWENTY-FIVE AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($25.00) for said Weld County Dance Hall License, and WHEREAS, having examined said application, the Board deems it appropriate to continue said matter concerning a Weld County Dance Hall License for Helen and Isauro Chavez, dba El Rojo Lounge, to January 12, 1994, to allow a hearing concerning renewal of a Tavern Liquor License, with extended hours, for said applicant. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that this matter be, and hereby is, continued to January 12, 1994. at 9:00 a.m. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, by the following vote on the 13th adopted day of December, A.D., 1993. ATTEST: Weld County Clerk to the Board BY: eputy Cler to the B APPROVED AS TO FORM: tto ey BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Constance L. Harber , C airman W H. bs'e', Pr • Tem eorge Baxt•r Da e K. Hall Barbara J. Kir yer £.0ooiq 931263 RESOLUTION RE: GRANT COUNTY DANCE HALL LICENSE NUMBER 227 ISSUED TO EATON COUNTRY CLUB - EXPIRES DECEMBER 31. 1994, AT 12:00 MIDNIGHT WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Eaton Country Club has presented to the Board of County Commissioners an application for a County Dance License to hold public dances at the location described as follows: 37661 Weld County Road 39, Eaton, Colorado 80615 WHEREAS, said applicant has paid to Weld County the sum of TWENTY-FIVE AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($25.00) for said Weld County Dance Hall License, and WHEREAS, having examined said application, the Board deems it appropriate to grant a Weld County Dance Hall License to the Eaton Country Club, and WHEREAS, said license shall be issued upon the express condition and agreement that the public dances wilt: be conducted in strict conformity to all laws of the State of Colorado, and any violation thereof shall be cause for revocation of the license. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that Dance Hall License Number 227 be, and hereby is, granted to the Eaton Country Club to conduct dances at the hereinabove described location. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that said License Number 227 shall be in effect through 12:00 o'clock midnight, December 31, 1994, conditional upon the applicant conducting all dances in strict conformity to all laws of the State of Colorado. 931264 LCOo37 az; fiPet DANCE HALL LICENSE - EATON COUNTRY CLUB PAGE 2 The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 13th day of December, A.D., 1993. ATTEST: Weld County BY: APPROV Clerk to the Board BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD LLCOUNTY, COLORADO / tee Constance L. Har ert, eorge,E. Baxt Dale K. Hall Chairman 931264 _• f �,,.,. .. -7S/ I WELD COUNTY APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO CONDUCT PUBLIC DANCE OR DANCES November 30, 199'3cvr..;. DATE TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY, COLORADO; License fee of $25.00, payable to Clerk to the Board, P.O. Box 758. Greeley, Colorado 80632, is hereby tendered and application is hereby made for a license to conduct a public dance hall, booth or pavilion, where public dances are held, for the calendar year 19 94 or portion thereof. The undersigned hereby makes application for a County Dance Hall License, under the provisions of Title 12, Article 18, CRS, 1973 as amended, and for that purpose makes the following answers to the questions contained in this application. Every question must be answered. Any false answer or statement made by the applicant constitutes perjury and the person making such statements subjects any license issued herein to revocation. 1. List the name and address of applicant. (If application is by a partnership, give names and address of all partners. If application is by a corporation, give names and address of all officers.) Name Ranee Country Club Address 17h6I welt 39 or P O 'shy 24n, Enron, r) 2. Is applicant organization incorporated under the laws of this State for purposes of a social, fraternal, patriotic, political, or athletic nature, not for pecuniary gain; or is it a regularly chartered branch, lodge, or chapter of a national organization or society organized for such purposes, being non-profit in nature; or Is it religious or philanthropic institution? Yea ( No ( ) If "No", explain. 3. Complete the following: Name Manager Rick Cole President John Rawness Vice -President Kathy Carlson Treasurer Kent Reitz Secretary (same as above) Trade Name (If any) Address P.O. Box 240, Eaton, CO 30615 P.O., Eaton, Co 80615 Greeley, CO 80631 Windsor, CO 80550 Telephone lo. Telephone Number of Manager 454-2587 List EXACT date(s) for which application is being made for license. From (Date): Jan 1 Bours:2:00 a_m To (Date): Dec. 31 Hours:2:00 a.m. ADDRES ct block s and part E of 0 the E section where a located, on andf frepossible, give es must bu given. street lot, and number.) 37761 Weld Country Raod 39. Eaton. CO 80615 931264 7. Are these premises now licensed under the State Liquor or Beer Code? If answer is "Yes", to whom is the license issued? Yes (ac) No ( ) 8. Do you have legal possession of the promisee for which this application is made, either by deed, lease, or written permission of owner? Yes (oc) No ( ) 9. Has a license been issued previously? Yes (Doc No ( ) Signature of Applicant STATE OF COLORADO ) as OF WELD h , she (they) is ar/ a the. applicant(e) abovebeing named That he,t duly sworn on she (they) has/havedeposes and yread the s: That above and foregoing application and the answers made thereto, and well knows the contents hereof, and that the answers made to the interrogatories therein set forth are true to his, her (their) own knowledge. oy,daei Signature of Applicant Sub ribed and sworn before me this %'day of A.D., I9g . Deputy ' Clerk Notary Public My commission oxpires Oct. 22, IY.;. 9x126!,4 amt fati- C t J 8 2 0) w L a re a a a to .o O V 7w, y A = Co N O w ++ Tr J:3.2 EN a u d 0 t M 0 g C a I. ra 0 0§ a C _T to = s 0.0 m r O su its bm a 0 0 O 0 0 V 0. 0 4.4 • O. Pi 0 O T G O U d 0 N. p sr ' O nS. -od 0 > 3 „ m a C - 4 o 5 O 0 0 c f. • xEoscz C • . o O r 0 V 2 0 a & g V 0' Z (J 00 O 0 EX 0 W rd —ie--z/ area w N+ews°d S 5'°Qpie e0°K0d 1V1O1 Aho.1001" 0I1 WssMovssse•ppv pin -an itheactli ✓ flI0I 0elenryep en oue W01 M el WMWs 4.0X.4.0X.Ii ,wlwe e°i AioMIoo oel3,useH °°i A aulaO MOWS °ei PagpaQ 3 51903 03 'nova 6£ x3M 199L£ 631.0 X11.O.03 tt01V3 3113, (OSIS4StS GaSI 11YW NN0ILYNNJINI Sod ION MAN.' 30M13A00 i]NVtl!ISNI ON 11VW 031dU.H33 HOd £4133311 66h 2Lh L9E d RESOLUTION RE: APPROVE AGREEMENT FOR REHABILITATION SERVICES WITH NORTH COLORADO MEDICAL CENTER, INC. AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board has been presented with an Agreement for Rehabilitation Services between Family Educational Network of Weld County and North Colorado Medical Center, Inc., commencing December 13, 1993, and ending September 30, 1994, with further terms and conditions being as stated in said agreement, and WHEREAS, after review, the Board deems it advisable to approve said agreement, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the Agreement for Rehabilitation Services between Family Educational Network of Weld County and North Colorado Medical Center, Inc. be, and hereby is, approved. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that the Chairman be, and hereby is, authorized to sign said agreement. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 13th day of December, A.D., 1993. ATTEST: Weld County Clerk to the Board BY: 01,-.4.752.—,2 Deputy Clefko the Bo PPPROV D, AS TO FORM: A 1 County Attoiney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Constance L. W. H. eb`ster, . e(orge‘Baxt Dale . Hall Barbara J. Xi yer f -.000o l cc: t'Q; Netle 931262 ORIGINAL NORTH COLORADO =MEDICAL CENTER, INC. AGREEMENT FOR REHABILITATION SERVICES This Agreement made and entered into, by and between NORTH COLORADO MEDICAL CENTER, INC. a Colorado corporation, hereinafter called "CONTRACTOR" and FAMILY EDUCATION NETWORK OF WELD COUNTY, located in Weld County, Colorado, hereinafter called "FENWC" WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Contractor is a hospital with an established Rehabilitation Services Department and, as a result thereof, is possessed of certain skills that FENWC desires to use; and WHEREAS, Contractor desires to provide on -site speech -language services; and WHEREAS, FENWC desires to retain Contractor as an independent contractor in order to avail itself of the services of Contractor in connection with its need to provide speech -language services to its students. NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the foregoing and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties do mutually agree as follows: 1. Engagement of Contractor. FENWC hereby retains Contractor and Contractor hereby accepts engagement by FENWC upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. 2. Term. Subject to the provisions contained herein, the term of this Agreement shall commence on December 13, 1993, and shall automatically terminate on September 30, 1994. 3. PartTime Nature of Agreement. During the term of this Agreement, Contractor agrees to make its services available to FENWC on an as needed basis, up to 802 hours, for the duration of the contract. 4. Scope of Work. Contractor will provide on -site speech -language services to FENWC students. On -site refers to any of the eleven Head Start locations serviced by FENWC (Schools) as reflected in Exhibit A, hereto. The scope of such services shall be guided by FENWC. Speech -language services shall be provided to those students identified and referred by FENWC. Contractor shall provide FENWC with written reports summarizing said services which shall fulfill the legal and accreditation requirements of the parties hereto. Such reports shall be maintained by FENWC. Fara.Educ.Network/1293.02 1 931262 5. Scheduling of Engagements. Contractor shall schedule services so as to be rendered during normal school hours. Contractor shall provide individual schools within FENWC with forty-eight (48) hours prior notice of all scheduled services. All engagements shall be scheduled at mutually agreeable times and dates. 6. Equipment and Supplies. FENWC shall provide the Contractor with all facilities, equipment, and supplies as are reasonably necessary in order for the Contractor to perform its obligations under the Agreement. 7. Nature of Relationship. The relationship between FENWC and Contractor is strictly that of independent entities and is not an agency or employment relationship. No party is an employee, agent or representative of any other party by virtue of this Agreement nor shall any such party have any expressed or implied right to authority to assume or create any obligation or responsibility on behalf of or in the name of any other party by virtue of this Agreement. Contractor also acknowledges that it will not be entitled to participate, by reason of this Agreement, in any employee benefits provided by FENWC. FENWC has contracted to receive services only and is interested in the results of the Contractor's efforts. Contractor shall be solely and entirely responsible for its own acts and omissions during the performance of this Agreement. 8. Contractor's Representatives. In connection with the speech -language services provided hereunder, FENWC will interact administratively with Helen Woolley, Contractor's Rehabilitation Services Program Manager; or other such individual as the Contractor's President may designate. The Rehabilitation Services Program Manager shall assign a speech and language pathologist who is registered with the Colorado Department of Regulatory Agencies to provide on -site services pursuant to this Agreement. By registration, it is understood that the speech -language pathologist shall be a graduate of an accredited rehabilitation curriculum and in good standing with the American Rehabilitation Association Code of Ethics. 9. wiling Information. Immediately following the provision of services, Contractor shall provide to FENWC on a form that is acceptable to both parties, specific billing and utilization information for the services rendered. Contractor shall make available to FENWC all financial records relating to Contractor's services at the request of FENWC. Contractor shall submit to FENWC, an aggregate statement listing all charges on a monthly basis. 10. Fees. NCMC understands that the Head Start program is the payor at last resort and will bill any other third party payor before billing Head Start for services provided. Contractor shall charge FENWC for services performed at a FENWC site by Contractor on an hourly basis in accordance with a fee schedule attached hereto as Exhibit B. Such fee schedule shall be reasonable, fair, and consistent with the basic commitment of Contractor to provide quality health care to residents of Weld County. Under no Pam.Educ.Network/1293.02 2 931262 circumstances may the fee schedule be modified without the express prior written authorization of the parties hereto. 11. fampemgisn. In consideration of the rehabilitation services provided by Contractor, FENWC shall pay Contractor within thirty (30) days from receipt of Contractor's aggregate monthly statement. 12. fagatuthlhll;Y. Contractor and FENWC agree not to disclose any privileged information to third parties without first obtaining personal t or student or responsible party thereof, unless otherwise the o written required edsent uof nder applicable law. permitted or under 13.. a. NCMC agrees that it is an independent contractor and that its officers, employees, and clients do not become employees of Weld County employees as a result of the execution of this Agreement. b. Weld County, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, its officers and employees, shall not be held liable for injuries or damages caused by any negligent acts or omissions of NCMC, or its employees, volunteers, or agents while performing functions as described in this Agreement NCMC shall not be held liable for injuries or damages caused by any negligent acts or omissions of Weld County, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, its employees, volunteers, or agents while performing this Agreement. NCMC shall provide workers' compensation insurance for all employees of NCMC engaged in the performance of this Agreement, as required by the Colorado Workers' Compensation Act. Likewise, FENWC, by and through the Board of Weld County Commissioners, shall provide adequate liability and workers' compensation insurance for all of its employees, volunteers and agents engaged in the performance of this Agreement. c. No officer, member, or employee of Weld County and no member of their governing bodies shall have any pecuniary interest, direct or indirect, in the approved Agreement or the proceeds thereof. d. NCMC understands that monitoring and evaluation of the performance of this Agreement shall be conducted by the Weld County Division of human Resources and the results provided to the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County. e. NCMC and FENWC assure compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1986, and that no person shall, on the grounds of race, creed, color, sex, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under the approved Agreement. Fam.Fduo.Network/1293.02 3 931262 14. Renresentres ationc, Contractor neither represents nor warrants that the services provided hereunder shall assure FENWC of of Education, the Joint Commissioaonnon A nccredi Accreditation of Healthcare censure by the Colorado Department (JCAHO), by any other accrediting body, or by any licensing agency. Organizations 15. Enuggsmentsfarsant. It is agreed and and Contractor nor FENWC shall hire or attempt to hire the e other both � that during the term of this Agreement or for aparty's nemployees during mutual consent. °d of twelve (12) months thereafter, without 16. Liability Insurance. The Contractor will carry at its own expense professional liability insurance coverage in the amounts equal to at least $1,000,000 for each claim and $3,000,000 annual in aggregate. 17. Termtnatinr, Either the Contractor or FENWC may contractor relationship established by this Agreement terminate u the independent iv thirty (30) days written notice tothe other Termination h rr aton cause, by giving automatically upon loss of Federal funding to FENWC. ri may also result termination, the payment due for services rendered will be made in accordance wicase ofth Section ad the herein. 18. Interruttns Neither party to this Agreement shall be liable to the other for delays in delivery or failure to deliver or otherwise to perform anyobligation Agreement, where such failure is due to any cause beyondhisr easoonnable ccoontrol including but not limited to Acts of God, fire, strikes, war, flood, earthquakes or Governmental action. 19. ratirt- Aercem n s.. tadni:nti WaivP6. negotiations between the parties hereto and constituThis tes the entire ea all e agreement and understanding between the parties with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement No alteration, modification or change of this Agreement shall be valid except by an agreement in writing executed by the parties hereto. 20. N41m. Any notice required to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be sent by certified mail, return receipt requested, postage pre -paid, to NCMC at North Colorado Medical Center, Inc. 1801 16th Street Greeley, CO 80631 ATTN: Steve Mack, Director of Contract Management And to FENWC at: Fam.Educ.Notwork/1293.02 4 931262 Family Education Network of Weld County Head Start Program 1551 North Seventeenth Avenue Post Office Box 1805 Greeley, CO 80631 ATTN: Tere Keller-Amaya, Director 21. Assignment. This Agreement is not assignable by FENWC without the express written consent of Contractor. 22. $everability. If any provision of this Agreement or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be invalid or unenforceable to any extent, it is the intention of the parties that the remainder of this Agreement and the application of such provision to other persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby and shall be enforced to the greatest extent permitted by law. 23. Captions. The captions contained in this Agreement are for convenience or reference for the parties and are not intended in any manner whatsoever to construe, define or limit the scope or intent of this Agreement or any provisions hereof. 24. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, f which when so executed shall be an original, but all of which together shall constituteo one agreement. 25. Federal Matching of Funds Wervicesj. NCMC understands that the need to contribute matching funds is an integral part of being awarded a Federal grant. In order to meet this requirement, NCMC will contribute the following Materials and Services at its sole expense: administrative costs for managing this contract, costs of time and travel for the therapist providing service, costs of photocopying handouts, and costs of test materials (see Exhibit C for detail). Fam.Fduo.Network/1293.02 931262 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date and year above written. NORTH COLORADO MEDICAL FAMILY EDUCATION NETWORK OF WELD COUNTY CENTER, INC. By: Elaine Drake, Division Director Date: Date: By: e Mac Date: WELD COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Constance L. HaAert,Chairperson /03//s/Q WELD COMB CLERjT OAR ATTEST: ex By: eputy Clerk/ WELD CO OF HUMAN RESOURCES Wa t peckman, Executive Director Fam.Educ.Network/1293.02 6 By: Tere Jer-Amaya, Di 931262 EXHIBIT A SPEECH -LANGUAGE SERVICES: Estimated Percentage of Time 1. Screening students for speech -language needs 2. Performing diagnostic evaluations to determine needs and optimal treatments 3. Provide appropriate interventions on individual, group, and consultative bases 4. Consult with parents and teachers in regard to suggested interactions to augment student's speech -language development 5. Provide applicable training opportunities to staff 6. Offer opportunities to meet one-on-one or in a group setting with parents to discuss their child's progress, specific needs, speech - language development, etc. Fazn.Educ.Network/1293.02 7 5% 10% 55% 15% 5% 10% 802 Hrs or 931262 EDIT B Fee Schedule Fees payable to Contractor for Rehabilitation Services provided to FENWC shall be calculated at the rate of $40.00 per hour. Supplies, if necessary and authorized by FENWC, shall be payable at Contractor's usual and customary charge. Preparation of evaluation reports, preparation and attendance at staffing and all other consulting services shall be payable at the rate of $40/hour. Billed fees shall not exceed $32,080.00 for the term and provision outlined in this Agreement. Fam.Educ.Network/1293.02 8 931262 EX D3IT C Federal Match Detail Administrative Costs of Managing Contract, i.e. time from Stanwyck and Helen Woolley will not be billed. Time and Travel Costs for Therapist providing Service. Cost of Photocopying Handouts. Cost of Test Materials. TOTAL VALUE OF MATCHING DETAIL Fam.Educ.Network/1293.02 9 Caryn $ 3,100.00 4,800.00 150.00 931262 cc, COLORADO a i#12— mEmoRAnDum Board of County Commissioners rnr,, f ....� S7 roConstance L. 4arbert, Chairpersonp,,, December la, 1993`" From Walter 3. Speckmann Executive Director, Hum3n- o rtes Sob ,.Purchase of Service Agreement between FENWC and NCMC Enclosed for Board approval is a Purchase of Service Agreement between the Family Educational Network of Weld County (FENWC) and North Colorado Medical Center (NCMC) Rehabilitation Services for Speech/Language Services. The scope of services include on -site speech -language services to Head Start eligible students up to 802 hours of services. NCMC will be reimbursed a maximum of $32,080 for the term and provisions outlined in the Agreement. The term of this Agreement is from December 13, 1993 through September 30, 1994. If you have any questions, please telephone Tere Keller-Amaya at 353-3800. 93I262 RESOLUTION RE: APPROVE SINGLE ENTRY POINT CONTRACT BETWEEN COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES AND AREA AGENCY ON AGING AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado. pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board has been presented with a Single Entry Point Contract between Colorado Department of Social Services and Weld County Division of Human Resources' Area Agency on Aging, commencing February 16, 1994, and ending June 30, 1994, with further terms and conditions being as stated in said contract, and WHEREAS, after review, the Board deems it advisable to approve said contract, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the Single Entry Point Contract between Colorado Department of Social Services and Weld County Division of Human Resources' Area Agency on Aging be. and hereby is, approved. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that the Chairman be, and hereby is, authorized to sign said contract. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 13th day of December, A.D., 1993. ATTEST: Weld Conty C er to the Board BY: Deputy Cler.c othe B APPROVED AS TO FORM: County Attorne BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WEL COUNTY, COLORADO Constance Barbara J. K r. -yer 931261 Ca: CAAA Departmenror Agency Number 381000" :, Contract Routing Number , MD 94-0252 SINGLE ENTRY PO:NT AGENCY CONTRACT THIS CONTRACT, made this 16th day of _Febru3rv. 1994, by and between the State of Colorado for the use and benefit of the Department of Social Services, 1575 Sherman, Denver, Colorado 80203-1714 hereinafter referred to as the State or the Department and Weld County Board of Commissioners by and throuch the Weld County Division of Human Resources' Area_Aoency an Acinc. 1551 North 17th Avenue P.O, Box 1805. Greeley, Colorado 80632. hereinafter referred to as the contactor. WHEREAS, authority exists In the Law and Funds have been budgeted, appropriated and otherwise made available and a sufficient unencumbered balance thereof remains available for payment in Contract Encumbrance Number MD 94-0252 and for the Single Entry Point program, COFR's codes: Fund 100, Agency UAA. Appropriation Code 1.; and WHEREAS, required approval, clearance and coordination have been accomplished from and with appropriate agencies, and WHEREAS, the State has established a Colorado Medical Acaharance Program in order to participate in Title XD( of the Social Security Act (Medicaid), and WHEREAS, the Department is the designated sincie Colorado agency responsible for the administration of the Medicaid program, pursuant to 26.4-104, Colorado Bevised Statutes (CRS.). as amended, and WHEREAS, the Department Is authorized, pursuant to Sections 26-1.1030 and 26-4-521, tin„ C.R.S. as amended, to contract with designated Single Envy Point agencies to serve as independent contractors for the administration of long term care programs, and WHEREAS, Section 26 4522, C.R,S. as amended, provides that the Single Entry Point agency shall be recommended by the Board of County Commissioners, and considered for approval by the Department in accordance with the authorizing legislation, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County has designated the Contractor to be the district Single Entry Point agency, and WHEREAS, the Department has approved Initial certification of the Contractor as a Single Envy Point agency, WHEREAS, the Department desires to enter into this Contract with the Contractor herein for the administration of the Single Entry Point program, as set forth in greater detail below, and WHEREAS, as of the date of the execution of this Contract, the Contractor meets all statutory and_regulatory requirements for entering into this Contract, NOW THEREFORE, It is hereby agreed that: 1. Contractor shall perform the functions of single entry point agencies as defined by sections 26-4-507 and 26- 4-522, C.R. as amended, and the applicable rules and regulations adopted by the. State Board of Social Services (hereafter referred to as 'state regulations'. These state regulations may be found in the Code of Colorado Regulations (C.C.R.) at 10 C.C.R. §2505.10. and may also be found in Volume 8 of the Department's staff manual, titled Medical Assistance.' asice Page 1 of 12 931261 2. Contractor agrees to perform its obligations hereunder in conformity with the provisions of Title XIX or the Social Security Act, other relevant federal and state laws and all pertinent federal and state regulations promulgated pursuant thereto: including, without limitation the Colorado Social Services Code. Section 26-1- 101.iit sees, C.R.S.. as amended, and those applicable portions of the Department's Staff Manual: Volume 3. entitled Income Maintenance,' 9 C.C.R. §2503-1; Volume 5, entitled 'Finance and Accounting. 11 C.C.R. §2508.1; Volume 7, entitled 'Social Services,' 12 C.C.R. §2509-1 through §2509-3; Volume 8, entitled Medical Assistance: 10 C.C.R. §2505-10: and Volume 10. entitled 'Services for the Aging. 12 C.C.R. §2510.1, as all the foregoing provide on the date this Contract is executed. and as they may later be amended. 3. Contractor shall perform the functions of case management for eligible persons as defined in the state statutes and regulations, Including but not limited to Intake/screening /referral, assessment of client need. development and implementation of a care plan, on -going case management, monitoring of clients, reassessment, and case closure. 4. Contractor shall perform all necessary administrative functions for the operation of Single EntrY Point agencies, as defined in the state statutes and regulations,. including but not limited to such matters as the following: a. establishing a community advisory committee for the purpose of providing public input and guidance for single entry point agency operation; b. administering a personnel system for recruiting, hiring, evaluating, and terminating employees: c. performing accounting tasks in compliance with all rules and regulations for accounting practices set forth by the state department: d. maintaining adequate liability insurance to meet the state departments minimum requirements for contract agencies: e. information management collecting and reporting of summary and client specific data pertaining to information and referral services provided by the agency, program eligibility determination, financial eligibility determination, care planning, service authorization, resource development, and fiscal accountability: f. recordkeeping: maintaining client records In accordance with program requirements. Including the documentation of all case activities, the monitoring of service delivery, and service effectiveness: g. resource development: facilitating the development of local resources to meet the long term care needs of individuals who reside within the single entry point district served by the Contractor, h. protecting the confidentiality of all applicant and recipient records; and I. protecting the clients rights as defined by the state department under applicable programs. 5. Contractor shall comply with the standards as outlined in the state statutes and regulations, for the operation of the Single Entry Point agency which include, but are not limited to the following: a. Contractor shall afford appropriate and timely access to services for all clients and will facilitate the application process for potentially eligible individuals and respond in a timely manner to ail referrals of eligible clients: b. Contractor shall provide thorough assessments of care needs and resources to assure the most appropriate targeting of all private and public long term care resources to the needs of the clients. Such targeting shall not supplant but shall support self care, family care and other informal community care; c. Contractor shall process paperwork In a timelyand accurate manner to promote timely service to clients: d. Contractor shall provide accurate and timely documentation of client and agency activities: and xas8e Page 2 of 12 931261 e. Contractor shallnot provide direct services unless a;waiver Is received from the State, Department based on criteria set forth in the state regulations for single entry point agencies. 6. Contractor shall provide case management functions to recipients of publicly funded long term -care programs, Including, but not limited to Medicaid nursing facility care. Home and Community -Based -Services for the Elderly, Blind and Disabled (HCBS-E13O), Home and Community -Based Services for Persons Living with AIDS (HCBS-PLWA), Home Care Allowance, Adult Foster Care, the Program for All -Inclusive Care of the Elderly (PACE), and certain in -home services available under the federal 'Older Americans Act of 1965, as amended'. The authorization and administration of services through a publicly funded program shall be in accordance with the program's eligibility criteria, as defined by applicable state and federal statutes and regulations, as they exist on the date this Contract is executed. and as they may later be amended. 7. In a contract subsequent to this initial one-year contract, the Contractor may be required to provide case management services to persons able to pay privately for such services, 8. Contractor shall develop procedures for the transfer of clients from one county to another within the Single Entry Point district and from one district to another in accordance with the state statutes and regulations. 9. Contractor shall provide staff who meet the qualifications set forth in the state statutes and regulations, to perform the following functions: administrative/supervisory, and case management 10. Contractor shall arrange for a licensed medical professions to be available to staff for consultation regarding medical and diagnostic concerns, 11. Each year during the term of this contract, Contractor shall be considered for certification by the Department In accordance with standards and requirements sot forth in the state statutes and regulations. Decisions about certification shall be based upon but not limited to on -site visits and other evaluation of agency performance In the following areas: quality of services provided• compliance with program requirements, Including case management standards adopted by' 'e Department; timeliness; performance of administrative • functions, Including reasonable cost per client, timely responses, managing programs in one consolidated unit, on -site visits to clients, community coordination and outreach, and client monitoring; targeting of populations served: and financial accountability. 12. In accordance with procedures set forth in applicable state statutes and regulations. Contractor performance shall be reviewed by the Department or its designee on an ongoing basis. Contractor will be notified within 30 days of the outcome of such reviews, which may result In approval, provisional approval, denial, or termination of certification. 2. Contract General Provisions 1. Term: The term of this Contract shall be February 16. 1994, through June 30, 1994. There is an option to renew on an annual basis for each of the next four years under the same terms and conditions as stated in the contract As of the date that the parties have entered this .contract a one-year contract term corresponds to the time period for which the Colorado Legislature hare appropriated funds to operate the single entry point system. 2. Parties' Relationship: The parties of this Contract Intend that the relationship between them contemplated by this Contract is that of employer -Independent contractor. No employee or agent of Contractor shall be or shall be deemed to be an employee or agent of the State and shall have no authorization, express or implied, to bind the State to any agreements, settlements, liability or understanding except as expressly set forth herein. Contractor writ, be solely and entirely responsible for Its acts and the acts of Its employees, agents and subcontractors, if any, during the performance of this Contract CONTRACTOR SHALL PAY WHEN DUE ALL REQUIRED EMPLOYMENT TAXES AND INCOME TAX WITHHOLDING INCLUDING ALL FEDERAL AND STATE INCOME TAX ON ANY MONEYS `enµ tlP Pe1RSUANT TO THIS CPNTRACT, Page 3 of 12 931261 3. Compliance with Applicable Laws: The Contractor shah at all times during the execution of this Contract strictly adhere to all applicable federal and state laws and implementing regulationsas they currently cdst and may hereafter be amended. This includes protection of the confidentiality of all applicant/recipient records, papers, documents, tapes and any other materials that have been or may hereafter be established which relate to this Contract.' The Contractor acknowledges that the following laws are included Title Vi of the Civi Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. Sections 2000d-i gt.,�gg and its 45 C.F.R. Part 80gj.,2gg.:-and implementing regulation. Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. 29 U.S.C. Section 794, and its imple r. C.F.R. Pan 84: and rnen egutation, 45 the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, 42 U.S.C. Sections 6101 ,Qt mg. and its implementing regulation. 45 .C.F.R. Pan 91; and Tide VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1984; and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967; and - the Equal Pay Act of 1963: and the Education Amendments of 1972, - the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, P.L. 99.603 - the Americans with Disabilities Act. 1991, and all regulations applicable to these laws prohibiting discrimination because of race, color, national origin, age, sex, religion and handicap, including Acquired immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) or AIDS related conditions, covered under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended cited above. Included is 45 CFR 92.36(e), which requires that affirmative steps be taken to assure that small and minority businesses are utilized, when possible, as sources of supplies, equipment. construction and services. This assurance is given in consideration of and for the purpose ofobtaining any and all federal and/or state financial assistance. Any person who feels that s/he has been discriminated against has the right to file a complaint ether with the Colorado Department of Social Services or with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for CM Rights. Contractor assures that clients' rights will be protected. Contractor further assures that clients have the right to apply for services, to have their eligibility for services determined, to receive an adequate quantity and quality of the services for which they are eligible, to appeal denials of service, and: to have their communications with the agency dealt with confidentially. The Contractor will notify each client of 'his/her rights to appeal, and will facilitate appropriate access to advocacy services from the Colorado Long Term Care Ombudsman, Adult Protective Services, other supportive Services, and the Area Agency on Aging/Tide III OM Advocacy Services.] 4. Confidentiality of Records: Contractor shall protect the confidentiality of all applicant/recipient records and other materials that are maintained In accordance with this Contract Except for purposes directly connected with the administration of this shall be disclosed in a form Identifiam/Project. no information ble with the or obtained applkaru/rom �ecipt applicant/recipient �� in possession of Contractor applicant/recipient or a minces parent or guardian, or .unless ordeSd tten consent iofs the Contractor shall have written policies governing access to, duplication and dissemination a court of competent information. Contractor shall advise Its employees, agents and subcontra ,thatthey of,allsuch ttf to these confidentiality requirements. Contractor shall provide its employees, agents and are subject ifa to thew copy or written at if any. With a explanation of these confidentiality requirements before access to confidential data Is permitted. Page 4 of 12 931261 lance 5. Conflict of Interest a. Definition • Appearance of Conflict of Interest The term applies to the relationship of a contractor with the state when the contractor also maintains a relationship with a third parry and the two relationships are in -opposition. In on from order knowledge ocreate of ee these paance opposing iofn a conflict of ect it Ithat the contractor know that thestaLIM for the rto two relationships are in opposition. Interests. It is only necessary b. Appearance of Conflict of Interest During the term of the contract the contractor shall not enter any third party relationship that gives the appearance of creating a conflict of interest Upon learning of an existing appearance of a conflict of interest situation, the contractor shall submit to the State a full disclosure stat a disclosure setting gstatementregaired by forth the details that create the appearance of a conflict of interest Failure to promptly submit this paragraph shall constitute grounds for the State's termination, for cause, of its contract with the contractor. 6. Proprietary Information: a. Definition Proprietary information for the purposes of this contract is information relating to a party's research. of development, trade secrets, business affairs, internal operations and management procedures aits customers, clients or affiliates, but does not include information (t) Lawfully obtained from third parties. (2) that which is in the public domain, or (3) that which Is developed independently. b. Neither party shall use or disclose directly or indirectly without prior written authorization any proprietary Information concerning the other party obtained as a result of this contract. Any proprietary �Cin information removed ' from the State's site by the Contractor In -the course of providing services ill be accorded at least the same precautions as are employed by the Contractor for similar information in the course of its own business. 7. liability Insurance/Fidelity Coverage - Contractor. During the term of this Contract and any extension(s) hereof, Contractor agrees that It will keep in force an insurance policy or policies, Issued by a company authorized to do business in Colorado. In the minimum amounts specified below. In the event of cancellation of any such coverage, Contractor shall immediately notify the State of such cancellation. a. Standard Workman's Compensation and Employers' Liability 1) As required by State statute Including occupational disease, covering all employees at the work site. b. Except as to a -public entity described below, General Liability (PL and PD) (Minimum) 1) Combined single limit - 5600,000 written on an occurrence basis. 2) Any aggregate limit will not be less than $t million. 3) Contractor must purchase additional insurance if claims reduce the annual aggregate below $600,000. 4) State of Colorado to be named as additional insured on each comprehensive general liability policy. 5) Certificate of Insurance to be provided to the State (within 10 working days after receipt of award). e31261 - Page .5 of I2 6) Insurance shall Include provisions preventing cancellation without 60 days prior notice by certified mail to the State. c. Except as to a 'public entity described below, Automobile Liability (Minimum) 1) Contractor to carry a minimum of 5600,000 combined single limit auto insurance. d. Additional coverage may be required In specific solicitations, e. For licensed professionals providing services in their professional capacity, professional liability insurance in an amount not less than $150,000 for any injury to one person in any single occurrence, and, no less than $600,000 for an injury to two or more persons in any single occurrence. If the Contractor is a 'public entity within the meaningof the Colorado Governmental Immunity Act. 24-10-101, et sea.. C.R.S., amended (-Act'). Contractor shall maintain such insurance, by commercial policy or self - Insurance, as is necessary to meet Contractor's liabilities under the Act. Proof of such insurance shall be provided upon request by the State. THE ONTRACTOR S THAT THE S ARE NOT E►JTITLEDCTOUNEMPLOYMENTNINNSURAENCE BENEFITS UNLESS THOtCON7RACTOR OR AR AND ITJS �THIRD PARTY ttOVIDES SUCH COVERAGE AND THAT THE STATE DOES NOT PAY FOR OR OTHERWISE PROVIDE SUCH COVERAGE. 8. Licenses/Approvals/Insurance: IlceContractor certifies that, at the time of entering into this Contract, it has currently in effect all necessary Contras approvals. Insurance, etc. required to properly provide the services and/or supplies covered by this Contractor further certifies that, Ma foreign corporation. It currently has a Certificate of Authority to do business in Colorado issued from the Colorado Secretary. of State naming the act as its agent for service of process, of State or another to 9. Billing/Payment Procedure: The State shall establish billing procedures and reimburse the Contractor in such amounts as may from time to time be specified by the State pursuant to applicable federal and state statutes and regulations, including the Colo�rm►ado Sdin9 Assistance Act Section 26-4-101 et. seq.. CRS, as amended, and the State Rules for the Long Entry Point System. as such statutes and rules currently exist or may hereafter be amended. State funds shall be allocated to each Single Entry Point agency based on the number of counties in a district and the number of clients served in community -based care programs in that district. The Contractor shall submit monthly expenditure statements, using forms and procedures prescribed by the State. Total compensation to the Contractor under this contract shalt not exceed the limitation contained in the General Provision entitled 'Compensation/Maximum Payable: The Contractor shall receive state and federal funds in monthly payments from the State. Allowable agency expenditures are set forth by Federal rules, CFR Title 45, Pan 74, Appendbc G: Office of Management and Budget Circular A-87 or A-122, whichever Is applicable; and the U.S. Department of Health and Welfare, December 1976, Cost Principles and Procedures for Establishing Cost Allocation Plans and Indirect Cost Rates for Grants and Contracts with the Federal Government as indicated presently or amended in the future. 10. Compensation/Maximum Payable: Payment pursuant to this Contract will be made asearned, in whole or In part, from available state funds in an amount not to exceed $5$.$97 for the purchase of the within -described services. The liability of the State, at any time, for such payments shall be limited to the unspent amount remaining of such funds. At the end of the term of this contract, the total expenditures billed by the Contractor shall be reconciled with the total Page 6 of 12 931261 compensation already paid or still owed by the State, subject to the maximum encumbrance stated above. Contractor wilt return any excess funds received by it to the State by August 1, 1994. 11. Federal Funds Contingency: Payment pursuant to this Contract, if in federal funds, whether in whole or in part, is subject to and contingent upon the continuing availability of federal funds for the purposes hereof. In the event that said funds, or any part thereof, become unavailable as determined by the. State. the State may immediately terminate this Contract or amend It accordingly. 12. Records Maintenance and Reporting; 'The contractor shall maintain a complete file of all records, documents, communications, and other materials which pertain to the operation and evaluation of the program/project or the delivery of services under this Contract. Such files shall be sufficient to properly reflect all direct and indirect costs of labor, materials, equipment, supplies and services, and other costs of whatever nature for which a contract payment was made. These records shall be maintained according to generally accepted accounting principles and shall be easily separable from other Contractor records. Contractor shall complete reports as required by the State and cooperate with all program monitoring and evaluation efforts by the State. 13. Records Retention and Availability: All such records, documents, communications, and other materials shall be the property of the State and shall be maintains by the Contractor, in a central location and custodian, in behalf of the State, for a period of three (3) years from the date of final payment under this Contract, or for such further period as may be necessary to resolve any matters which may be pending, or until an audit has been completed with the following qualification: If an audit by or on behalf of the federal and/or state government has begun but is not completed at the end of the three (3) year period. or If audit findings have not been resolved after a three (3) year period, the materials shall be retained until the resolution of the audit findings. 14. Performance Monitoring: Contractor shall permit the State and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (source of federal funding), and any other duly authorized agent or governmental agency, to monitor all activities conducted by the Contractor pursuant to the terms of this Contract. As the monitoring agency may in its sole discretion deem necessary or appropriate, such monitoring may consist of internal evaluation procedures, examination of program data, special analyses, on -site checking, formal audit examinations, or any other reasonable procedures. All such monitoring shall be performed- in a manner that will not unduly Interfere with contract work 15. Audits and inspections: The Contractor authorizes the State to perform audits and/or inspections of its records at any reasonable time during the term of this Contract and for a period of three (3) years following the date of final payment under this Contract. to assure compliance with its terms and/or to evaluate the Contractors performance hereunder. 16. Single Audit Clause All non-profit contractors, cooperating state agencies and county governments receiving more than 525.000 per fiscal year In federal funds shall comply with the requirements, for audit as established by the U.S Office of Management and Budget Circular Number A-128 and A-133 for obtaining financial and compliance audits. The standards to be followed may also be found in the Standards for Audit of Governmental Organizations, Programs, Activities and Functions Issued by U.S. General Accounting Office, 1988 Revision, or the Guidelines for Audits of Federal Awards to Non-profit Organizations (Apr0 1989) published by the Department of Health and human Services. For purposes of state and local governmental agencies, the term independent. auditor means a Si.az Lra Page 7 of 12 931261 state or local government auditor who meets the independence standards specified in Generally Accepted Auditing Standards: or a public accountant who meets such standards. Ali for-profit contractors shall comply with the regulations set forth for non-profit contractors. 17. Assignment/Delegation/Subcontracting; This Contract is in the nature of purchased services onbehalf of third -party clients. Except as herein specifically provided otherwise, the duties and obligation of the Contractor arising hereunder carmot be assigned. delegated nor subcontracted except with the express prior written consent of the State. Subcontracts permitted by the State shall be subject to the requirements of this Contract, and the Contractor is responsible for all subcontracting arrangements and the delivery of services as set forth in this Corwaet. 18. Successors: Except as herein specifically provided otherwise, this Contract shall Inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns. 19. Representatives: For the purposes of this Contract, the individuals identified below are hereby desigrmtedrepresentatives of the respective parties. Either party may from time to time designate in writing a new or substitute representative(s): For the State: Dann Milne, Director Office of Lono Term Care System Develooment Name & Title For the Contractor. Linda E. Piper, Qlrector ' • Weld County Area Agency onAolno Name & Title 20. Notice: All notice required to be given by the parties hereunder shall be given by certified or registered mall to the Individuals at the addresses set forth below. Either party may from time to time designate in writing a substitute person(s) or address to whom such notices shall be sent To the State: Dann Milne, Director Office of Lona Term Care System Colorado Dent of Social Services 1575 Sherman Street. 7th Floor Denver. Colorado 80203-1714 21. Litigation: To the Contractor. Linda E, Piper Director Qgvelotxnent Weld County Area Agency on Aaina 1561 North 17th Avenue. P.O ; Box 1805 Gr elev Colorado 80632 The Contractor shall promptly notify the State in the event that the Contractor learns of any actual litigation in which the Contractor Is a party defendant in a case which involves services provided under this Contract The Contractor, within five (5) calendar days after being served with a summons. complaint, or other pleading which has been filed in any federal or state court or administrative agency, shall deliver copies of such document(s) to the State's Executive Director. The term litigation' Includes an assignment for the benefit of creditors, and filings In bankruptcy, reorganization and/or foreclosure. 22. Dispute Resolution: Any dispute concerning performance of the contract or the provision of direct services by the Contractor shall be resolved in accordance with the procedures set forth at section. 8.024.4. entitled "APPEAL PROCESS; Volume 8 of the Department's staff manual, 10 C.C.R. §2505-10. Itaat4`n Page 8 of 12 931261 ' 23. Remedies: The Executive Director of the State or designee may exercise the following remedial actions should s/he find the Contractor substantially failed to satisfy the scope of work found in this Contract ailure to satisfy the scope of work shall be defined to mean Incorrect or improper activities or inaWob by Contractor. These remedial actions are as follows: a. Withhold payment to Contractor unta the necessary services or corrections in performance are satisfactorily completed; b. Request the removal from work on the contract of employee(s) and/or agent(s) of Contractor whom the Executive Director or designee justifies as being Incompetent careless, Insubordinate, unsuitable, or otherwise unacceptable, or whose continued employment on the contract s/he deems to be contrary to the public interest or not in the best interest of the State, c. Recover reimbursement for those functions or deliverables which have not been performed and which due to circumstances caused by Contractor cannot be performed or If performed would be of no value to the State. Denial of the amount of payment shall be reasonably related to the amount of work or deliverable lost to the State: d. Terminate the Contract for cause Immediately upon timely written notice without compensation for termination costs. 1) In the event this Contract Is terminated for cause. final payment to the Contractor may be withheld at the discretion of the State until completion of final audit e. Incorrect payments to the Contractor due to omission. error, fraud, and/or defalcation shall be recovered from the Contractorby deduction from subsequent payments under this Contract or other contracts between the State and the Contractor, or by the State as a debt due to the State or otherwise as provided by law. 1. My other remedy afforded to the State at section 8.024.3, entitled 'ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES; Volume 8 of the Departments staff manual, 10C.C.R.$2505-10„ or otherwise under law. 24. Termination for Convenience: This contract may be terminated at the convenience of either party by giving the other party sixty (60) days prior written notice. If notice is so given, this Contract shall terminate on the expiration of the sixty (60) days, and the liability of the parties hereunder for further performance of the terms of this Contract shall thereupon cease. butthe parties shall not be released from the duty to . perform . their termination.obligations up to the date of 25. Severabiity To the extent t this Contract be executed andaccomplished within the Intent of the CContract, the terms o this Contract arerformance of eseverable, obligations the parties y may be or provision hereof be declared invalid or become Inoperative forany shall of affect the validity of any other term or provision � any reason, invalidity hereofor failure shall o not same term The upon ver of any breach of a term not be construed as a waiver of any other term. Or the same subsequent breech. 26. Restrictions on Lobbying: Certification for Contracts. Grants. Loans and Cooperative Aoryements The Contractor certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that: (1) No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid by or on behalf of the contractor, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress. an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding fir' �y+ 0.3 .±± ♦.� _ W1CfaJL 931 Page 9 of 7,2 loan or cooperative agreement that utilizes federal funds. of any Contract and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modif Cation of any Contract, grant (2) If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for Influencing or attempting to influence an employee of Congress inwith thiers or employee oftr any t agency, a Member of congress an agreement rt or contractor shall complete connection Standard Federal grant loan, or cooperative aLobbyir,t, the accordancewithits instructions.LLL 'Disclosure Form to Report 'Lobbying', in (3) The contractor shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for subawards at all tiers .(including subcontracts, subgrants and contracts under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of the certification is a prerequisite for maldng or entering Into this transaction Imposed by section 1352, title 31. U.S. Code. My person who falls to fife the required certification shall be subject to a dv11 penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure. 27. DEBARMENT CERTIFICATION: m f nt n2,6 21 n , v A m As required by Executive Order 12549, the Contractor certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief as follows: Tier Pani nt (1) The prospective lower tier participant certifies, by submission of this contract that neither it nor its principals is presently de irred,tsuspendsn, proposed for'debannent declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from by any Federal department or agency. (2) Where the prospective lower tier participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this contract. tower Tier Participant' is defined to include the Contractor and its principals, agents and subcontractors who are obligated to perform services pursuant to the terms of this contract. Contractor agrees that it will Include, without modification, the above CenIflption clause in any such subcontract it may enter 28. integration of Understandings: This Contract is intended as the complete integration of all understandings between the parties as to the any force subject matter hereof. No prior or contemporaneous addition, deletion, or other amendment hereto shall have erein in deletion, orrothertammendmmeen hereto shall haveer, unless embodied haany force or effect unless embodied in a written contract writing. No subsequent novation. renewal. addition, executed and approved pursuant to the State Fiscal Rules. Page 10 of 12 931261 SPECIAL PROVISIONS CONTROLLERS APPROVAI...... 1. The oonbiat Max not be deemed v.14 until It thee new been approved by the Canvale. of the stet. of colorede Of mach .a.Mtent r he may dewnete. This proleien M trpho•ble to any contract inwWi,q the payment of coney by the State. FUND AVAJLABIL7ry ...... ... 2. Financial obligations of the State payable efts the -dint fiscal year art eonting.nt won finds for that purpose being ayypgytedt budgeted rid otherwise made available BOND REQUIREMENT .. a It tile oehv.ct Involves the payment of mote than- fifty. %he weed doremforth come mien, action, repair, meNens.o , or t arah work Warded In thee contract, dulT mein and d•Few to Ilna file ny building, read, badge, Within. towel. •w.ayaadweeks or other public ek• for this State, the eontrectererr before ardor, the•►erformensot y sufteMntbond or other .00h eurstyto be improved by sold official N with athe arm, noial Wort signature e4•cote. oelow for the grebes good and of this contract Such bond shall duly be oan.lriaa Mrtiredv. aidathelporlan.un•oftheeatr,braid ki addhlon, shag otgr or hi by . oueeecn aofoil to duly lyawry, for a any lbo ftithe rive to ,,faithfulhir.,petenare•.af OC•epoveot. rid of suppla used or ooaewud h connectoror hie v e foil in�pmRentrw labor, e wok c ems& ed to ewwe.. the ourety .IN pay e kr of the ask per cent ' be dae..Barely will s, - the se requurns in in red ie executed. the pea ono claim In fa oeof: teo ono.otor inns undue.. oont'a Of t rhea be a audited, Sward or Use,. calMed or rawer and flied, no e legs.. the the a State of under vhi•m y be p lieu of • d a paid. A it's Is or °O cashier's check or e bank mere- order payable to the Thane of true of Colorado may be accepted N lie of • bond. Thad pewit's M In OOmperpa with 3626100 CRS r amended. INDEMNIFICATION 4. To the extant authorised by law, the connector Mai indemnify, a Saline damages, aabity and court swede Including con, .pane., and air bola s ncise the Ste, its fa any assn tee agent., the O sad q all Its employees, agents, auboonbrWte. orattorney fan Wowed r • eswh of met a arurleeicrylry the aerrbeaer, or assigner pueteA to the bums of this caner. DISCRIMINATION AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION 6. The centnecter agrs.a to comply with the latter and sphlt of the Colorado Antidiscrimination Act of 1067, ae amended, end other applicable law retracting dhmwnlnrion and unfair employment premier (CRS 24.34.4021 and 'r nip ird by Execute,. OderEpW Opportunity ity and Affirmed,. Action, dated App IS, 1076. Pursuant Mears, fife Ic cwt pproyfalo,. Mal/be oonebeedIn a Sab condoms atrMee eapb. During the Wpmmance of this connect true contractor agrees S follow & (Same. religion, The contractor will not disint ea agave any employees as for employment beane of room, creed, national origin, S. marital that ancestry, mental a physical handicap, or oontrects wi tee affirmative action to Nee tad eacoat* re employed, and the !Sowing: nplye employment upgrading, gemployment without mord to the above mendicant characterlatk.. Soh action shag betide, but not be limited to Iowe of compensation: cation: and remotion for wiring. including arrandoeehb.,71r ltnent � qa: Wroes a tsrmYelser: ratan of payer ether employs., eM appgoams for employment, notion to bra contractor port, b Opal lo !hie neaour. sWas, evadable to provided by the eenv.odrrg officer setting forth prerMlar of nwpner..dM„1r,dr,.gpn .lawn MI in all solicitations will Tcalve cotror w 1, i for employmentor advertisements foe rgeua is foe, crest Color, paced- by or on Writ phr of the oaoter, state the( p -qualified ape ients handicap, a age. national origin, mew, mental Same, tagplpn, .nanny, marital Of pfryslcei (o) The contractor will to be provided laborby t union oor rep.�tfkr Soling with which he has • collective bargaining ap`.mam a other convect or wldarrtandvfalnc the labor anion or weer the Executive Oder, Equal 0marsh neprs„n rda of thedrelevant contractor's Orders ofrt e Governs. cOcrtr/dtY end Affirmative Aotian, datedApg-10,'1076, ate_. the Wee, aguMfMre,.amdrsMyMt Orders of the Id) The ecnnsotor and labor undone will furnish p information and reports required by Exechive Order. Equal AAp.41 7 te by the and by the nee, reguMHme and Ordinal of the Governor, or pursuant thereto, and will Ot awes {y air bock., Affirmative erode, d roguletlorr loo c000^baovm0 agency and the office of true Governor a had theism's for puppeee of fora 000ee b had boob, armada. and Nyestipatian to aWarteN aourpllare, with acorn rues. (e) A labor organization wil not **chide any individual otherwise qualified from lull individual from msrMwehip M such labs organization or discriminate• merit... I hoe in atom labor ergwork o en, or expel ca such rote, creed. Corr, ex. nation. origin, or arrnaby, against any o/ fie rnsrrrbsrs la the full enjoyment of wad[ opportunity. because of labor orga& e ation, or the employeor members thereof will not aid, abet. lathe, .otter or coerce the MmMdn,tW a obebu ct apevent cry pereon from complying with the or tits convect or any Odeorde of any act defined In the oo t ei t to W d demo* a ladinatly, to any re actfin deed in this convect to be deabnNaary, r {a•unad.Owwwea:.er attempt tier Revised 7/03 Form 6AG02S 30S-6107.1022 tall Ce Page 11 of 12 931261 10i In ee r w tt of the entente nonconMlianwo with the noralleu vais,n aware of nle atnb..t or with aye ran Nee, mantle e, a this convert may be amend, terminated at rwweded In whale or inert asy the ante, may M Oscine noble he Rater stab conb..b in aecontenee orlon Monw with pr n c u ., authorized twine In iu1vnly O. Equal O,opertr f and Mamas Action.M wn. of Ait 1975 and Ow Nee. ng'dedna anoe thereath, and mph other earns r may be imposed and n.niedrs aspronged M Once. Ina Opportunity and Atfmueve Anton, of Awn 10, 1076. a may M inn Oawr se'or pct by Moe, npuaatbrns, a aed.n fawwa0ated In aaaadrpe.therwah, vided by Lew. (N The contractor wid Include the orevemw of pr graph (al through in.way wdwonowot and wieontrater paohre war iaSs spa by Seebe . r g u ti•es. or anal auboo ad a ant to or ve OSal .., Ear Opportunity Man and Atn of Aril 10, 1975. M eta such payww sea contrary will tab sea saran with respect to any subcontracting or eteetwee order as Ow Ortnieti q Merry may dhot. se a meaty of abaft ash provira.. MoludMO sanctions for nowmtpanca pnren. however, Met In the event the oont aotar becomes Meshed M. ale threatnd with. Ildpatlsm.. with the subeentreoter a vender a a result of an dnppen Ay the Bent eoti g mercy, the connector NW/ tenet Ole Stab of Corrado to ante into such legation to prract the letterset of toe atateof Calons. COLORADO LABOR PREFERENCE Oa. Provision* of W 5-17.101 a 102 for pntwwms of Ceara labor so ppfwabletia this oonbset If pubes woks within the State are undertaken Meader and re financed in whole or In prt by Sbta funds. b. When torwt. atloo Went for pair .elect is to N awr$ed to oblddr. a resident blear ekes be domed a mans agait • Mnnalden richer firs a onto or MOM ant *Ouch to the profwanse One a naa lei Mete stab a Ionia aotngy In whit the nrr-residenttear is a ardent If tiwmimd by tin after namable to awarding the bid that oen l a rse with this atle*eaan .00 may ea dray or federal hods which chwn p*wary to leawilable a would mama be hirpr[rt with naarrnsnb of padres a. this aAsestlon SiM lie wile vied, but only to men*ye or to aerate Ow Inoeneietsnalr With Pain reffu rant ICs 6/9-101 and 1021... GENERAL 7. TM laws of the Stab of Corrado and Nee and regulations leech pw.uant thereto vise be applied In the Mrpnbapu. extruder any atonement ofParton Any emeriti.. of U.Scontract contract whether...not not reference Orprated herein by referwe whprovides fa aNNcdon by . any aaOrNdrrl body _ot.kwre M confect win sold lawn, nor' ed n and regularapbe oerwld nd null and "aid. Nothing Oontabed In act proWian M ley satrn by Mentioether n whia caper to negate this r any other sada proudon.In whole a b part sail bowl r rdwwable or available invWdae lie tonne,.of tide contract toextant that ere oaten= for own of eaaeyt s. win the apeman of this provision wig nag uring the grief monoo of this that have been dray hereafter established. L the *enactor OMstrbOy adhere to act apeoWla federal eel atafa ewe, races and repyaawe 9. The signatories Mato everfhat they as tamale with CIS 166401.. et amt.. (Bribery act Publics Ohio.). and eat no violation of such provrlre le paawt.... Corrupt Inflames) and CRS 166101. at tea.. (Abs.. of 10. The .lgnatOnes are that to their blawrdga, no roe smprye* has a ewsrW a beneficial lamM1at whatsoever in to eras a roam data/red hsMn; N WITNESS. WNEREOp, the panes hereto have ancuted has ton na on the day fiit above written. fence Weld County Board of Commissioners by and through the Weld County pee eW ne,. Division of Human Resources: Area Agency on Aging By:fo; c 4. onatance r e t 1 3/93 Passion tram) Chairman of the Board 84-6000-813 see arm Masew or rear La. Mortar IH.Grponnlon:) Ateat(Sea6 N /yll-ts! a.retay, . tea.+.. th.4q,, STATE OF COLORADO ROY ROMER. GOVERNOR tton Kann Sem a..pwe 0.rw DEPARTMENT .. OF SOCIAL SERVICES ATTORNEY GENERAL , CON7ROLLFR. Pone 0 -AC -02C Revised 1/93 39663-01.1030 WELDSEPK.pp.1.12.12/2/01 dS I"E r,, c Page 12 of 12 931261 S ;La/4744 iz$, COLORADO mEmoRAnDum Constance L. Harbert, Chairman Weld County Board of Commissioners 12-09-93 To Date u Walter J. Speckman, Executive Director Human Resources.,;;- From L^ Single Entry Point Contract with Colorado Social Services Subject: • ,1 r f 1 I7 Enclosed for the Board's approval are five copies of the contract between the State Department of Social Services and the Weld County Board of Commissioners by and through the Weld County Division of Human Resources' Area Agency on Aging. This contract will allow the Area Agency to become the Single Point of Entry for long term care services in Weld County. Programs that will be consolidated within tie Single Entry Point include Home and Community Based Services, Home Care Allowance, Adult Foster Care, and Certification for Nursing Home Placement. The term of this contract is from February 16, 1994 through June 30, 1994. A new contract will be negotiated for the State fiscal year beginning July 1, 1994. Funding under this contract is set at $58,897.00 Please call Linda Piper at Extension 3320 if you have questions. 931261 ATTEST: RESOL UTION RE: APPROVE PURCHASE OF SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH SJB CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC. AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN S, the Board of County pursuanttostatute and the Weld iCounty Home Rule ssioners of d Charter, isvested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board has been presented with a Purchase of Services Agreement between Family Educational Network of Weld County and SJB Child Development Centers, Inc., commencing December 1, 1993, and ending November 30, 1994, with further terms and conditions being as stated in said agreement, and WHEREAS, after review, the Board deems it advisable to approve said agreement, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by County, Colorado, that the Purchase Educational Network of Weld County and and hereby is, approved. the Board of County Commissioners of Weld of Services Agreement between Family SJB Child Development Centers, Inc. be, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that the Chairman be, and hereby is, authorized to sign said agreement. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, tunc December 1, 1993. adopted by the following vote on the 13th day of December, A.D., 1993, nunc pro / ✓ e Weld County Clerk to the Board BY: APPRO Deputy Cle 0 to the Board, AS TO FORM: ty _ orn BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Constance L. bert Chairman W. H ,-bster, Pro em Georg- Baxtar Dale K. Hall Barbara J. Kirkm•.er 931265 Hg0040/ cc : Hie; SJ(3 PURCHASE OF SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN SJB CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS, INC. AND THE FAMILY EDUCATIONAL NETWORK OF WELD COUNTY THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this lit, - day of December, 1993, by and between the County of Weld, State of Colorado, by and through the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, on behalf of the Weld County Division of Human Resources' Family Educational Network of Weld County hereinafter referred to as "FENWC" and SJB Child Development Centers, Inc., hereinafter referred to as "SJB, Inc." WITNESSETH WHEREAS, the attached agreement conditions, shall govern certain activities for slots purchased under Grant Number 08CH0019 during the period December 1, 1993 through November 30, 1994. 1. Work To Be Performed: SJB, Inc., shall in a satisfactory manner as determined by FENWC provide enhanced pre-school learning opportunities to twenty (20) children of Head Start eligibility. Facilitate successful transition of pre-school aged children into the District 6 kindergarten. Promote parental involvement in all levels of the elementary schools and promote educational success of District 6/FENWC students. 2. Compliance With Approved Program All activities authorized by this Agreement will be performed in accordance with the approved work program, the approved budget, the grant conditions and relevant HHS directives including 45-CFR-1304 Head Start Performance Standards and 70.2 The Parents to include: • • 1304.2-1 Education Services: objectives 1304.2-2 Education Services: operations 1304.2-3 Education Services: facilities 1304.3-2 Health Services Advisory Committee: participation 1304.3-6 Health Education 1304.3-9 Nutrition Services: objectives 1304.3-10 Nutrition Services 1304.4-1 Social Services: objectives 1304.4-2 Social Services: content 1304.5-1 Parent Involvement: objectives 1304.5-2 Parent Involvement: development of parenting skills 1304.5-3 Parent Involvement: communication 1304.5-4 Parent Involvement: with area residents, program 93126a 3. Reports, Records and Evaluations FENWC shall supervise, evaluate, and provide guidance and direction to SJB, Inc., in the conduct of activities specified under this contract. SJB, Inc. agrees to submit to FENWC such reports as may be required by HHS directives or by FENWC including reports on eligibility, attendance, fiscal status, general program operations, parent involvement, etc. SJB, Inc. also agrees to prepare and retain, and permit FENWC to inspect as it deems necessary for grant purposes (in addition to inspections authorized by the conditions in the grant from HHS), as well as all other records that may be required by relevant HHS directives, with the exception of confidential client information. SJB, Inc. further agrees that FENWC may carry out monitoring and evaluation activities to include, at a minimum, quarterly reports and will effectively ensure the cooperation of SJB, Inc. employees and board members in such effort. 4. Changes FENWC may, from time to time, request changes in the scope of the services of SJB, Inc. to be performed hereunder. Such changes, including any increase or decrease in the amount of SJB, Inc. compensation, which are mutually agreed upon by and between FENWC and SJB, Inc., must be incorporated in written amendments to this contract. 5. Compliance With Local Laws SJB, Inc. shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, and codes of the state and local governments. 6. Covenant Against Contingent Fees SJB, Inc. warrants that no person or selling agency or other organization has been employed or retained to solicit or secure this contract upon an agreement or understanding for a commission, percentage, brokerage or contingent fee. For breach or violation of this warrant, FENWC shall have the right to annul this contract without liability or in its discretion, to deduct from the contract or otherwise recover the full amount of such commission, percentage, brokerage or contingent fee, or to seek such other remedies as legally may be available. 7. Schedule Of Payment Immediately following the provision of services, SJB, Inc. will provide to FENWC, specific billing of budgeted and authorized expenditures for services rendered. Reported expenditures shall not exceed $36,400.00 for the required period of performance. SJB, Inc. shall make available to FENWC all documentation and financial records relating to the reported expenditures, at the request of FENWC. On approval of the billing, FENWC will reimburse SJB,Inc. for reported expenditures within 15 days. 9312&5 8. Termination FENWC and SJB, Inc. may, by giving a thirty (30) day written notice specifying the effective date, terminate this contract in whole or in part for cause, which shall include, but not limited to: (1) failure, for any reason, of FENWC to fulfil in a timely and proper manner its obligations under this contract, including compliance with the approved program and attached conditions, and such statutes, Executive Orders, and NHS directives as may become generally applicable at any time: (2) submission by FENWC or HHS or to SJB, Inc. of reports that are incorrect or incomplete in any material respect: (3) ineffective or improper use of funds provided under this contract: (4) suspension or termination by HHS of the grant to FENWC under which this contract is made, or the portion thereof delegated by this Contract. FENWC may also assign and transfer this contract when required by HHS direction. If FENWC is unable or unwilling to comply with such additional conditions as may be lawfully applied by by HHS to the grant to FENWC, SJB, Inc. shall terminate the contract effective date thereof. reasonable wrInren such notice event that adequate signifying h have been made for the transfer of the delegated activities to another Agency. In the event of any termination, all property and finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, and reports purchased or prepared by FENWC under this contract shall be disposed of according to NHS directives, and FENWC shall be entitled to compensation for any un-reimbursed expenses reasonably and necessarily incurred in -satisfactory performance of the contract. Notwithstanding the above, SJB, Inc. shall not be relieved of liability to FENWC for damages sustained by FENWC by virtue of any breach of contract by SJB, Inc. and FENWC may with hold any reimbursement to SJB, Inc. for purpose of set-off until such time as the extract amount of damages due FENWC and SJB, Inc. is agreed upon or otherwise determined. 9. Non -Federal Share SJB, Inc. will contribute no less than $9,100.00 of non-federal inkind/match to the program. Documentation of the non-federal share must be tracked and reported to FENWC with billings. Documentation of the non- federal inkind/match must be kept and be available at the request of FENWC. 931265 11. Assurances: a. SJB, Inc. agrees that it is an independent contractor and that its officers, employees, and clients do not become employees of Weld County, and therefore are not entitled to any employee benefits as Weld County employees, as a result of the execution of this Agreement. b. FENWC, the Weld County Board of Commissioners, its officers and employees, shall not be held liable for injuries or damages caused by any negligent acts or omissions of SJB, Inc., its employees, volunteers, or agents while performing this Agreement. SJB, Inc., its officers and employees, shall not be held liable for injuries or damages caused by any negligent acts or omissions of FENWC, or its employees, volunteers, or agents while performing functions as described in this Agreement. SJB, Inc. shall provide adequate liability and worker's compensation insurance for all of its employees, volunteers agents engaged in the performance of this Agreement, as required by the Colorado Worker's Compensation Act. Likewise, FENWC, by and through the Board of Weld County Commissioners, shall provide adequate liability and workers' compensation insurance for all employees of FENWC engaged in the performance of this Agreement. c. No officer, member, or employee of Weld County and no member of their governing bodies shall have any pecuniary interest, direct or indirect, in the approved Agreement or the proceeds thereof. d. SJB, Inc. understands that monitoring and evaluation of the performance of this Agreement shall be conducted by the Weld County Division of Human Resources and the results provided to the Weld County Board of Commissioners. e. SJB, Inc. and FENWC assure compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1986, and that no person shall, on the grounds of race, creed, color, sex, handicap, or national origin be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under the approved Agreement. 9312fi5 WELD CO ST: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereunto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed as of the day and year first hereinabove set forth. WELD COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Constance L. Harbert, jai — - /��ha Sandy J. Bri• t, Di a tor DI SI.N OF HUMAN RESOURCES n, Executive Director WELD COUNTY CLERK TO THE BOARD By: Deputy Clerk to the Board ATTES:C 2 CF C^. COMMISSIONER S SNATURES ONLY SJB Child Development Centers, Inc. 931265 1519€ ADO mEMORAnDum Board of County Commissioner r0Constance L. Harbert, Chairperson°,,, Decemtc v 131 1993^.• r. ;7 .s . From D CO•,. 1r Walter J. Speckman, Executive Director, Human Respu^Fes1 i(br sub;.«:purchase of Service Agreement between FENWC nd'SJB" Ch'iTd Development Centers, (SJB, Inc.; Enclosed for Board approval is a Purchase of Services Agreement between the Family Educational Network of Weld County (FENWC) and SJB Child Development Centers, Inc. (SJB, Inc.)., aka, ABC Child Development Centers SJB, Inc. shall twenty (20) Head SJB, Inc. will kindergarten. provide enhanced preschool learning opportunities for Start eligible children. facilitate transition of Head Start children into SJB, Inc. will comply with all FENWC Head Start Grant Conditions including 45-CFR-1304 Head Start Per formance Standards and 70.2 The Parents. SJB, Inc. will be reimbursed a maximum of $36,400.00 for reported expenditures. The term of the Agreement is from December 1, 1993 through November 30, 1994. If you have any questions, please telephone Tere Keller-Amaya at 353-3800. 931265 adopted by the following vote on the 13th day of December, A.D., ATTES // D � eLL Weld `£y ICl.rk to the Board BY: Deputy Clerk to the Rpar-d ;' APPROVED AS TO FORM: County Attorne RESOLUTION RE: APPROVE CONTRACT WITH COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH FOR FEASIBILITY STUDY AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN - 49TH STREET WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board has been presented with a Contract for the feasibility study on 49th Street between Colorado Department of Health and Weld County Health Department, with terms and conditions being as stated in said contract, and WHEREAS, after review, the Board deems it advisable to approve said contract, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the Contract for the feasibility study on 49th Street between Colorado Department of Health and Weld County Health Department be, and hereby is, approved. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that the Chairman be, and hereby is. authorized to sign said contract. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, 1993. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD, COUNTY, COLORADO %Gvoi CC: HL; s pert 931266 THIS coNTRACT State of Colored CONTRACT, • Made this 1st the .use and benefit of Department 93 or' as the Staten aad betweeII t hereinafter referred hereinafter refs o to as the contractor. appropriated authority exists and aotherwise in balance thereofxSe made the Law and this contract remains available available and a nds have sufficient unencumbered budgeted, Appropriation Account Encumbrance No encumbering and subsequent WHEREAS, 212 and Organization 20410.784 in Fund e � Payment of WHERumber 100, accomplished from and with appropriate clearance and . under agencies; and C°°rtenation has been the provisions Study for wastewaterions of Public payments for completion of 9a ap ! treatment works, hereinafter funds have been made an aPProvable Feasibility �R�' the sewage tter referred to a the contractor meets te treatment s the Plan. WHEREASapplicable legal criteriaa for adesign ssistance; advancethe contractor assist Px°p°sed by NOW of allowance as provided alifein. ies for and is eligible tote and their THEREFORE, it to receive �. mutual THEREFORE, is hereby agreed agree as follows: is to each other, that for and in , hereinafter stated, the parties of 1• An advance of parties hereto of $5,000.00. allowance is to be awarded to the contractor in the amount 2. The Contractor is requiredforworkdone to utilize and adhere 3. pursuant to this contractto 40 CFR The Contractor shall Parts 31 and sequence assure complete and submit indicated as n to he Application of t able hereof Pplication his CoatzdCtrov Plan in such as, Attachment A. attached and by e er n by this referenCeeS�de Pasta Page 7, of ,¢ page3 9312= • 4: The State will, in consideration of said services by the Contractor, cause to be paid to the Contractor a sum not to exceed five thousand Dollars ($5,000.00) upon receipt of. signed statements, submitted in duplicate on forms to be supplied by the State, requesting reimbursement according to the provisions of this contract. Reimbursement shall be contingent upon affirmation by the State of full and satisfactory compliance with the .terms ._of this contract. Reimbursement will be made according to the following payment schedule: 30 percent upon execution of this contract, and compliance with preliminary conditionsprovided herein $1,500.00 30 percent upon receipt of draft Feasibility Study $1,500.00 30 percent upon receipt of- final'Feasibility en Y $1,500.00 10 percent upon approval of Feasibility Study $ .500..00 Total Contract $5,000.00 5. The Contractor shall not assign any interest in this Contract, and shall not transfer any interest in the same (whether by assignment or novation), without the prior written consent of the State thereto; provided, however, that claims for money due to contractor from the State under this Contract may be assigned to a bank, trust company, or other financial institution without such approval. Notice of any such assignment or transfer shall be furnished promptly to the State, and the State shall not be liable for payments made incorrectly, to the contract notwithstanding 'receipt of such notice. 6. No material produced in whole or in part under this Contract shall be subject to copyright in the United States or in any other country. The State and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) shall have unrestricted.. authority to publish, disclose, distribute, and otherwise use, in whole or in part, any reports, data or other material prepared under this Contract. 7. At any time during normal business hours and as often as the State, EPA, and/or the Comptroller General of the United States may deem necessary, extending to three (3) years after final payment under this Contract, there shall be made available to the State, EPA and/or representative of the Comptroller General of the United States all of the Contractor's records with respect to all matters covered by this Contract and ,Contractor will permit the State, EPA, and/or representative of the Comptroller General of the United States to audit; examine and make audits of all contracts, invoices, material, payrolls, records of personnel, conditions of employment, and other data relating to all matters covered by this Contract. 8. Periodic meetings among representatives of the State and the Contractor shall be held to review progress and accomplishments of the specific items and tasks to be completed. Such meetings will be held at intervals agreed upon by both parties. Page a of .¢ pages •3•0.0..t. 931286, COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH,- hereinafter, under the General Provisions referred to -as -Health", GENERAL PROVISIONS page 1.of-2 pages 1. The contractor shall perform its duties hereunder as an independent contractor and not as an employee. Neither the contractor norany agent or employee of the contractor shall be or shall be deemed co be an agent or employee of the state. Contractor s.-il a wh em w w comvensation Insurance in the a_ouncs reeuired by law. Contractor will be solely responsible for its acts and the acts of its agents, employees, servants and subcontractors during the performance of this contract. 2. Contractor authorizes Health, or its agents., to perform audits and to make inspections for the purpose of evaluating performance under chic contract. 3. Eicher party shall have the right to terminate this agreement by giving the ocher parrythirty days notice by registered mail, return receipt requested. If notice is so given, this agreement shall terminate on the expiration of the thirty days; and the liability of the parties hereunder for the further performance of the terms of this agreement shall thereupon cease, but the parties shall not be relieved of the duty to perform their obligations up co the dace of termination. 4. This agreement is intended as the complete integration of all understandings between the parties. No prior or contemporaneous addition, deletion, or other amendment hereto shall have any force or effect whatsoever, unless embodied herein in writing. No subsequent novation, renewal, addition. deletion, or otheramendment hereto shall have any force or effect unless embodied in a written contract executed and approved pursuant to the State Fiscal Rules. 5. If this contract involves the expenditure.. of federal funds, this contract is contingent upon continued availability of federal 'funds for payment pursuant co the terms of this agreement. Contractor also agrees to fulfill the requirements of: a) Office of Management and Budget Circulars A-87, A-21 or A-122, and A-102 or. A-110, whichever is applicable; b) the Hatch Act (5 USC 1501-1508) and Public Law 95-454 Section 4728, These statutes state chat federal funds cannot be used for:. partisan political purposes of any kind by any person or organization involved in the administration of federally -assisted programs; c) the Davis -Bacon Act (40 Stat 276A -276A-5). This act requires chat contractors or sub -contractors to work on assistance must be paid wages not less project by the Secretary of Labor; . 1494, -Mar. 3, 1921, Chap. 411, 40' USC al:,, laborers and and mechanics employed by construction projects financed by federal than those established for the locality of the d) 42 USC 6101 et seq, 42 USC 2000d, 29 USC 794. These acts require chat person shall, on the grounds of race, color, national origin, age, or handicap, excluded from participation in or besubjected co discrimination in any program activity funded, in whole or in part, by federal funds; and Page 3 of 6 Pages Rev. 06/01/92 no be or 931266 n. 'GENERAL PROM-$IONS--Page,2 of 2 pages e) the Americans with Disabilities Act (Public Law 101-336; 42 USC. L2101, 12102. 12111 - 12117, 12131 -- 12134, 12141--12150, 12161 - 12165, 12181 - 12189, 12201 12213 and 47 USC 225 and 47 USC 611. f) if the contractor is acquiring 'realproperty and displaceng'households or businesses in the performance of this contract, the contractor is in compliance with the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real -Property-Acquisition Polities Act, as amended (Public Law 91-646, as amended and Public Law 100-17, 101 Scat. 246 - 256); g) when applicable, the contractor is incompliance with the provisions of the "Uniform Administrative Requirements forGrantsand Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments (Common Rule). 6. By signing and submitting this contract the contractor states chat a) .the contractor is in compliance with the requirements of the Drug -Free Workplace Act (Public Law 100-690 Title V, Subtitle D. 41 USC 701 et seq.): • b) the contractor is not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from covered transactions by any federal department or agency. 7. To be considered for payment, billings for payment pursuant co this contract must be received within 60 days after the period for which payment is being requested and final billings on. the contract must be received by Health within 60 days after the end of the contract term, 8. If applicable. LocalMatchis to be submitted on the monthly payment statements, in the column provided, as required by the funding source. 9. If Contractor receives $25,000.00 or more per year in federal funds in the aggregate from Health, Contractor agrees to have an annual audit, by an independent certified public accountant, which meets the requirements of Office of Management and Budget Circular A-128 or A-133, whichever applies. If Contractor is required to submit an annual indirect cost proposal to Health for review and approval. Contractor's auditor will audit the proposal in accordance with the requirements of OMB Circular A-87, A-21 or A-122. Contractor agrees to furnish one copy of the audit reports to_ the Health Department Accounting Office within 30 days of their issuance, but not later than nine months after the end of Contractor's fiscal year. Contractor agrees to take appropriate • corrective action within six months of the report's issuance in instances of noncompliance with federal laws and regulations- Contractor agrees to permit Health or its agents to have access Co its records and financial statements as necessary, and further agrees to retain such records and financial statements for a period of three years after the date of issuance of the audit report. This contract contain federal funds as of the date it is signed,— This requirement is in additiononto any other audit requirements contained in ocher paragraphs within this contract. 10.' Contractor agrees to not -use federal funds to satisfy federal cost sharing and matching requirements unless approved in writing by the appropriate federal agency. Page _!_ of __6_ Pages Rev. 06/01/92 w 931266 CONTROLLER'S APPROVAL I. This contract'thaf not be deemed valid until it shall have been approved by the Controller of the Stars of Colorado or such assistant u he may designate. This provision is applicable to any contract involving the payment of money by the State. FUND AVAILABILITY 2. Financial obligations of me State of Colored* payable after the currant fiscal year are contingent upon funds for that purpose being appropriated, budgsse& and otherwise made available BOND REQUIREMENT3. If this contract involves the payment of more than fifty thousand dollars for the construction, crane.. repair, mainlaaanee, of improvement of anl,baildipg, .. : road, bridge, viaduct, tunnel, excavation or other public work for this State, the contractor in this contract, duly execute and deliver to the Sate official who will sign the contract, a shod"and and sufficient aribng ond of other ones the performance of any stoh warp rove dby said official in • penal tom not du than one-half of the total amount payable by the terra of this contract. Suet. bond shall bendy ecute orrery qualified edcorpo fie surety conditioned upon the faithful performance of to contract end in addition, shell exepted fai a op y foesa y labor, malenals, team hire. sustenance. provision, proveodor oro✓uerw omens: lhaail❑he «« his w01nct fail duly payfoemy contracted to be done or fails to pay an- polies usa ols. auredaget in h eapyeeror his the ar a the in perforof mance a work an amount not exceeding the sem specified r in to who supplies rental machiest s torr. or f eight p r etaneam, of l ss wort andissuretywillthe remand.,.. in the bond, . together with interest r IM rate of eight par ear , pay filed, no claim in favor of the contractor arising under such contract shall be audited. allowed or m' U°� such bond u encrated. e delivered and to the Treasurer of the State of Colorado may be accepted in lieu of a bond, This provision is in compliance with CRS 31.26-106,k or a beak money order payabl. INDEMNIFICATION 4. Todie extent authorized by law, the contractor shall indemnify, save, rand hold brwleaal damages, liability and court awards including costs, expenses. the State` its employees and agents. ntract any agents, subcontractors, P ter. and attorney fees incurred u • reset ofact or Arid all �s�� or assignees pursuant to the arms of this contract. any On by the COnvK10f.or its employees. , , DISCRIMINATION AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION 3. The contractor agrees to comply with the letter and spirit of the Colorado di5. anion and unfair Antidiscrimination M of 1957, as amended, and other applicable law respecting.. amp oymem preeli«e (CRS 24-34.402), rind as required by Executive Order, Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action, dated April 16, 1975. Pursuant Memo, the following provision; shell he contained in ell Slate CenfNrf! M Ind-Conn<Ctr. During the performance of this contract, the contractor agrees as follows: (a) The contractor will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, creed. Color, national origin. sex, marital status. religion. ancestry, mental or physical handicap, or age. The contractor will take affirmative action to insure that applicants ate employees are owed during anploymea, withal regard to the above. Mentioned chrataeriatis Surh.aesion shall include, d to the tt, and inr.. employmam upgrading, demotion, or transfer. recntitment or recruitment advr!msi laoffs or but not forms of c to fallowing: selection for training. including apprenticeship. The contractor a�" Y aces, a lrates m pay a caner forms ants eariyn; and. - notices to be provided by the contracting officer setting forth epees to foss in conspicuous pones, available CO employ<a and applicants for ernplplahhenL - .... provisions of toss non-discrimination clause. (b) The contractor will, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the contractor, sate that alt qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to nee, creed, color. national origin. sex, mental status, religion, ■nceury. mental or physical handicap. Or age. (e) The contractor will send to each labor union or representative of workers with whichhe lust Collective e e understanding, notice to be provided by the contracting officer. advising the labor union or workers' representativeeof the contractor's s cut r other contract e Executive Order, Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action. dated April 16. 1975. and of the Ma.commitment Gower under the regulations, and relevant Orders of the Governor. (d) The contractor and labor unions will fumish all information and reports required by Executive Order. Equal Opportunity -and Affirmative Attica of April 16, 1975, and by the rules, regulations and Orders of the Governor, or pursuant thereto, and will permit access to his books, records, and accounts by the. -. Contracting agency and the office of the Governor or his designee for purposes of investigation to ascertain compliance with such rules, regulations wanders. (e) A labor organization will not exclude any individual otherwise qualified from full membership rights in such labororgartization,or ups any arm -individual sex, membership in su such labor organization or discnmi ate against any of its members in the full enjoyment of ooh gi ancestry. !%'roan opportunity because Ms(Ce, errs color. (f) A labor organization, or the employees or members thereof will not aid, abet, incite. compel or coerce the doing of any act defined in this contract to be discriminatory or obstruct or prevent any person from complying with the provisions of this contract or any order issued thereunder, or attempt, either directly Or indirectly, to commit any act defincd.in this contract to be discriminatory. Form 6 -AC -0'B Revised IA3 393.33,014022 - — page 5 6 page.. 931266 W In the event of the contnc0r's noo.cep pf s with the sedisentleaten Mums of MU contact or with any of such tele retflaticet. or orders. ChM convict may e orders promulgated in dure+eeardana and n or suspended uti °Order. 000o Pert hy w art eonerleor �c be of April 116,19 $ f further in Pbeccaunled. authorized In eets tion and such other �' a by law. and Affirmative o 1 1 bey se y be OOe. or Ode � evoked ad de n tecutive Order. thowwln, or as *thaawlse Th) The veneer will lders� me Provisions of Pewee (a) through 00 in eery sabe enact and agency upon each subcontractor or issued ant to oThe contractorard Order. Equll al action .up.. Opportunity and paths of 6.1 mene � preemie t Many may request or teemed with. dem as a means of enforcing h.Ugjation. withtheubcoutra orOrvendersisuchd eembyheo order as the . agency involved or rebus Colorado to toter into such litigation to protect the Interest of the State of Colorado.- mpcoetractieias4ur�', the cnetractor COLORADO LABOR PREFERENCE i s. da Provisions of t]tS 417.iot s 102 forpnfaeeeeo of Colored* labor an applicable to Waoynuse ifpebee works within the Stan wuaderuken an fleece In whole or in pen by State Hods. _ ltanwrdx ad • the oRkwraconermalon comma for • public project is so be awarded to • bidder. • reside na l equal di.mernN4ed by +M smut or foss eman bidder n which W w- a preference asset resident. is d bidderfree y • atau of fare{ • he bid that th02) enw oar'se be p nosiwu with nau c. pp�°C with this seeks .Od may oaaae end of (idenf hod which would d Mama s angels ds is or m by„ .. eliminate the wqu«it hoed, (CRS L1f.w and � a earpeeded. beady to Oe titan ose. yry bptetem° voprthe aor to weN iaeeor4taocy with Federal GENERAL t The laws of the State of Colorado and raise and regulations issued pureuaet thereto shall be applied is me b contract. Any Provision of this comma whether or not amputated hersinby referee which provides for aAlu.aon is od,cwiae In conflict with said laws, maw and niWuione shall be ce sidend awl and void. Nerving coasted in u �a°°y��catiao. end enforcement of ire which purports tongueanyje0lcial body ayo(c mor whit► aeoe*ea 4 ueebm of u mendeable d special void ision in whereto o! miarProYeipe . p got iaval mplay aeries law *Mew by to 'royalcomplaint. en[, . s come the emu mac the I. At all acne hereafter b the ablesnarrca of this raaoaaL [M shaft seedy adhere to all applicable federal and state lawn, tulaa, lad bean may es dieing be performance Convector radttlaaan the have . and that no violation of such provision is preset. 9. The sigastories aver that they an familiar with CRS IS -5701. pt. seq. (Bribery sad Corrupt 1pfl114.401.ocu) and CRS IF01. et mg. (Mee of Public Office). 10. The neaten aver that to their knowledµ too stay employes he anyp.meetl or beaedc(el Inman whauwver in the service or property described Mere .,... IN WyfNESS WHEREOP, the parties hereto have nand MS Comm an the day Be above written. Contractor: (Full total Name) Weld County Commaaain..ea Poehloo ('taw)- Connie Harbert Coin Sr<oner 84-6000813 �99 3y trfORNEY GENERAL ;Y twin 6•ACC2C arias 1/93 n-si.eldgd aast APPROVALS CONTROLLER By Per 6 which 4 the Iwo(' 6 ^Sea inar eWapa on reseed me. Peg STATE OP. COLORADO ROY ROMER, GOVERNOR By DEPARTMENT - HEALTH VELD COONEY NAL= frp Oha S. Pickle Director PROGRAM APPROVAL: Debbie English, Program sir or 931266 • *INSTRUCTIONS ( I) Insert official Department designations. es. Administration. !.oral Amars, etc. as appropriate. (2) Set forth conpany(ies) or individuals) name(s) and address(es). (3) Insert a brief statement indicating masons fatontran.e.g_"The convacrorhaving special knowledge, expense and skill indiaprosingand testingdiseases effecting cattle; and" Use as many "Whereas's" as required- If additional space is required continue to above wards "NOW, THEREFORE:-" and state -con- tinued on page r. On page 2, state "Whereas continued haft page I" if required (4) Specify clearly the goods or services contracted for, the consideration moving from one party to the other, the time within the Convect is to be esecuted- limitatiocs on assignments, if any, and special provisions desired, or required. Seek legal assistance when in doubt. Separate each principal item and number con- secutively using as many pages as netesaery. (5) If a delegee signs for the Executive Director place the words "FOR THE' before the word `EXECHTIVE' • • Autographic, as distinguished flan stamped, sipuluws should, as a minimum. be ammo to the original. which will be filed by the Division eri ccoums and Control, and two counterpw. one ctwhich shall be transmitted to the contractor. If there is more than one Contractor acopy so signed will be sat to each. thus requiring additional autographic sirensss. 931266 Ir.• STATE tORADO COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Dedicated to protecting and improving the health and environment of the people of Colorado 4300 Cherry Creek Dr. S. Laboratory Building Denver, Colorado 80222.1530 4210 E. 11th Avenue Phone: (303) 692.2000 Denver, Colorado 80220-3716 I (303) 691-4700 December 3, 1993 Weld County Commissioners Attn: Connie Harbert, County Commissioner 915 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Re: Advance of Allowance Contract Dear Ms. Harbert: PP -7 9:50 _ CLERK( p Roy Romer Governor Patricia A. Nolan, MD, MPH E.ecudve Director Enclosed are four non -executed Advance of Allowance Contracts. Please have your signature attested to on all four copies and return to my attention as soon as possible. Upon execution a copy will be forward to you for your files. If you have any questions please feel free to call me at (303)692-3551. Sincerely, CAD Carolyn Hermann Administrative Assistant Financial Assistance Program Water Quality Control Division 92110ion kenMed Pape, Ac:c, ,.:'2r i?14-O 1.4 COLORADO Constance L. Harbert, Chairman To Board of County Commissioners Date Deceaber, 8, 1993 From John Pickle, Director, Weld County Hea1tlqlepartzxarD V(l` Subject: Contract for Feasibility Study - 49th Street The attached contract amendment Irom Colorado Department of Health is to fund the feasibility study on the 49th Street sewage disposal problem. TEC, our contractor has completed the study, and is awaiting payment prior to release of the study. The $5,000.00 amount will pay for the study and the Departments work on this project. We would appreciate your approval of this contract. 931266 RESOLUTION RE: APPROVE OIL AND GAS DIVISION ORDER TO ELK EXPLORATION, INC. AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, Weld County, Colorado, has received an Oil and Gas Division Order to Elk Exploration, Inc., 216 16th Street, Suite 1400, Denver, Colorado 80202, and WHEREAS, said Division Order covers land more particularly described as follows: Township 3 North, Range 66 West, 6th P.M. Section 2: S}NWt Weld County, Colorado WHEREAS, Weld County is entitled to a one -eighth royalty interest on production, and WHEREAS, in order to receive said royalty interest, Weld County must execute said Division Order, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and WHEREAS, said Division Order has been reviewed by a member of the Weld County Attorney's staff and found to be in order, and WHEREAS, the Board deems it advisable to approve said Division Order on the parcel of land described herein. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the Oil and Gas Division Order to Elk Exploration, Inc., 216 16th Street, Suite 1400, Denver, Colorado 80202, on the hereinabove described parcel of land be, and hereby Is, approved. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that the Chairman be, and hereby is, authorized to sign said Division Order. 931267 LECI-xdp ac: ECK DIVISION ORDER - ELK EXPLORATION, INC. PAGE 2 The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 13th day of December, A.D., 1993. ATTEST: //ease'? Weld County Cle1 rk to the Board BY: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WWEELLDDJ COUNTY, COLORADO Constan�bert hn /' ebster. Pr t L Dale K. H Barbara J. Kir eyer 931267 AR23665u0 OIL AND GAS DIVISION ORDER ELK EXPLORATION, INC. 216 10TH Street, Sults 1400 Denver, CO 80202 (303) 572-1400 PROPERTY NO, Each of the undersigned OWNERS guarantees and warrants he Is the owner of the oil and gas interest set out oppoeke his name on the reverse side hereof or the proceeds from the sale of oil, gas and hydrocarbons from the property described on the reverse side hereof, and until receipt of written notice either from Elk Exploration, Inc,. (*Elk") or from us. the undersigned owner and all other parties executing this instrument hereby authorize Elk, Its successors or assigns to receive and measure such sales in accordance with applicable contractual and/or governmental rules and regulations and to give credit as set forth on the reverse side hereof. The following covenants are parts of this Instrument and shall be binding on the undersigned, their successors, legal representatives, heirs and assigns: Olt: Olt sold hereunder shall be delivered f.o.b. to the tamer designated to gather and receive such oil, and shall become Elk's property upon receipt thereof by the carrier designated by It or by any other purchaser to whom Elk may sell such oil. The term 'or ao used in this dNisen order shall Include all marketable liquid hydrocarbons gathered at the lease. Elk agrees to pay for the oil sold hereunder et the price received by it from the purchaser(s), the posted price In the area for oil of the same grade and gnavity in the same producing field or area on the date said oil is received by the designated carrier, or pursuant to the terms of any applicable tales contract. Elk Is authorized to reduce the price by any gravity adjustments and truck, tankcar, or pipeline transportation charges as may be charged to It by the purchaser. Should the oil sold hereunder be resold by Elk to another purchaser accepting delivery thereof at the same point at which it takes title, Elk agrees to pay for such oil based upon the volume computation made by such purchaser and at the price received by Elk for such oil, reduced by any transportation or grimly charges deducted by such purchaser. Quality end quantity shall be determined in accordance with the conditions specified In the price posting, Gas: Settlements for gas shall be based on the net proceeds realized by Elk from the sale thereof for all volumes as measured at the meter runs) on the spicing unit described on the reverse skis hereof In accordance with Elk's gas purchase contracts applicable to the lands after deduction of a fair and reasonable charge for compressing, fractionation. Conditioning, or other process making it merchantable and for transportation if the gas N sold oft the property, Title to the gas shall pass to Elk or any purchaser, transporter, or gatherer designated by Elk at the meter run(s) on the spacing unit or at such other pdace(s) as may be designated In the applicable gas sales contract(s). Where gas la sold subject to regulation by any governmental authority, the pride applicable to such sale approved by such authority shall be used to determine the not proceeds rested from the sale, The term "gas' shall be deemed to Include gas, casinghesd gas, gasoline and aid Other hydrocarbons and products recovered In the processing and conditioning of such gas. If any portion of the proceeds derived from the sale of gas Is subject to refund under any order, rule or regulation of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission CFERC, or the provisions of the Natural Gas Act or Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978 (The'Acts), Elk may hold without interest the portion of the proceeds subject to refund unless Indemnity satisfactory to Elk has been furnished or until Elk's refund obligation has been finally determined. If any portion of the proceeds delivered from the sale of gas le paid over by tic under any order, rule or regulation of the FERC or the provisions of the Acts, Elk Is authorized to recover the amount of the refund applicable to me Interest of each of the undersigned from future payments or, at Elk's election, It may invoke the undersigned therefor, plus the legal rats of interest Elk Is or may be required to pay In connection with the undersigned's portion of the refund. Pooled Production: Should the oil, gas and/or hydrocarbons produced from the herelndescribod land (*Production, be commingled with those produced from one or more other separately owned tracts of lend prior to delivery to the designated canter(s), the commingled Production sold hereunder shay be deemed to bathe Interest of the undersigned in that portion of the total commingled Production delivered which Is allocated to the herein -described land on the basis of meter readings, tank strapping or any other method genersly accepted In the industry as an equitable bask for determining the quantity and quality of Production sold from each separately owned tract Such formula shall be uniformly applied to all owners of an interest In the tracts of land Involved. Should the interest of the undersigned In the Production from the herein -described lend be utilized with that produced from one or more other trade of land, this Instrument shall thereafter be deemed to be modified to the extent necessaryto conform with the applicable unitization agreement or plan and all revisions or amendments thereto, but otherwise to remain in full force and eked as lo clover provisions. In such event, the portion of the unitized Production sold hereunder shall be the Interest of the undersigned In that portion of the total unitized Production delivered which Is allocated to the herein described land and shall be deemed for all purposes to have been actually produced from said land. Settlements: Settlements shall be mode monthly by check mailed to the respective parties at the latest address known by Elk, according to the division of Interest herein speckled, less any taxes required by law to be deducted and paid by you applicable to the Interest(s) set forth herein, However, If the amount due any owner is less than Twenty -Five and 00/100 ($25.00) Collars per month, Elk, at Its option, may deer the making of such payment until such time as the aggregate amount due exceeds said sum. Evidence of Title: The oil and gas ease or leases, and any amendments, ratifications or comctlons thereof, under which saki Production Is derived, are hereby adopted, ratified, and conMmed as herein and heretofore amended. In the event any dispute orquestlon arises concerning ere title to ins Interest of the undersigned in said Production or the proceeds thereof, Elk will be NmIehed, tree dent, satisfactory abstracts or other evidence of title upon demand. Until such evidence of title has been furnished and/or such dispute, defect, or question of titre le corrected or removed to Ms satisfaction, or until Indemnity satisfactory to Elk has been furnished, Elk is authorized to withhold the proceeds of such oil or pas received and run, without Interest In the event any action or milli tied In any court affecting the title to the Interest of the undersigned in the herekWeer:rf ed lend or the Production therefrom or the proceeds thereof to which the undersigned is a part, written notice of the filing of such suit er action shall be Immediately fumihed Elk by the undersigned, stating the court In which the same is lied and the tide of such suit or action. Elk will not be responsible for any change of ownership In the absence of actual notice and uatelactory proof of receipt of notice and Interest ownershIp thereof; Elk shad be Indemnided and held harmless by each party to this division order, to the extent of each party's interest as set forth herein, from any claims, causes of action, challenges to title and judgments against It or as a result of each party; Interest or calm thereto rendered spinet ELK on account of receiving, purchasing, paying forortransporting Production therefrom credited to such party's Interest pursuantto this division order. B 1419 REC 02366500 12/29/93 15:29 $0.00 1/003 .F 1367 MARX ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK & RECORDER WELD CO, CO Contingent Interests: Whether or not any contingency is expressly stated In this Instrument, Elk le hereby relieved of any responsibility for determining when any of the interests herein shall increase, diminish, terminate, be extinguished or revert to other pates as o result of the completion or discharge of money or other payments from said Interest, or as a ',auk of the expiration of any time or term Imitation (ether definite or Indefints), and, unless Elk is also the operator of the property, as a result of an increase or decrease In Production, or as a result of a change In the depth. the methods or the means of Production, or as result of a change In the allocation of Production affecting the herein described hind or any potion thereof under any agreement or by order of governmental authority, and until Elk receives notice In writing to the contrary, t is hereby authorized to continue to remit the proceeds of Production wthout tiSEBy pursuant to the ONlebn of Intarest shown herein. Warranties: Working Interest Owners and/or Operators, and each of than, by signature to this Instrument, certify. guaranW and warrant for Me benefit and that of any pipeline or other prier designated to run or transport said oil or gas, Mat ■t of or gas tendered hereunder has been and shat be produced tom or hiwNgy ■boated to the herein described land In accordance with all applicable Federal. stets and local laws, orders, NIBS and regulations, This Instrument may be executed by one or more, but at covenants herein shat be binding upon any party executing earns and upon his heirs, devisees, successors and assigns Irrespective of whether other parties have executed this instrument. The undersigned and each of them, represent, guarantee and waraM that they are the legal owners, in the proportions set out below, of all tlms oil, gas and hydrocarbons produced from the wet(s) described below. Weil Neme(a): Description of Property: (Drilling and Spacing Unit) Formation(s): No. of Amor HSR HAMMER 16-2 S2NW/4 SECTION 2 Township 3 North, Range 66 West, 6th P.M. Weld County. Colorado Codell & Niobrara 80 Acres Credit To Division of Interest Type SEE EXHIBIT 'A' ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF: This ON and Gas Division Order Is executed this 13Tliay of DEC>'y^`SBER fig 93 and emotive as of the data of first Production. ATTEST: w BY: Witness of Signature Name Witness of Signature Witness of Signature e oil PO Box 758 No. Name Chairman /a3 Street or x l/5/93 84-6000-813 Greeley. CO 80632 Social Security (or Tax ID) Number City. State, Zip Street or Box No. Social Security (or Tax ID) Number City, State, Zip Witness of Signature Name Witness of Signature Street or Box No. Social Security (or Tax ID) Number City, State, Zip B 1419 REC 02366500 12/29/93 15:29 $0.00 2/003 F 1368 MARY ANN PEUERSTEIN CLERR & RECORDER WELD CO, CO 93126'7 EXHIBIT 'A' HSR HAMMER #6-2 TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 66 WEST SECTION 2: S/2NW/4 WELD COUNTY, COLORADO CODELL/NIOBRARA FORMATION Nitta Charles Graznak and Audrey Oraznak 205 Olive Lane Platteville, CO 80651 Calvin Lorenz do Apache Oil Patch Welding 3650 B. Parltman Village Drive Colorado Springs, CO 80917 Velda A. Hart 622 N. E. 41 Terrace Kansas City, MO 64116 SWAB, Inc. 475 17th Street, #1600 Denver, CO 80202 The Esperanza Corporation 718 17th Street, N808 Denver, CO 80202 High Plains Energy Company c/o Jonathon Roderick 1600 Broadway, #1565 Denver, CO 80202 John C. Wallace 200 Pine Avenue, #620 Long Beach, CA 90802 Thomas C. Wallace 1265 S. High Street Denver, CO 80209 Weld County �oard of County Commissioners 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80632 HS Resources, Inn. 731 Sansome Street, Fifth Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 INTEREST .03125000 TYPE RI .01041666 RI .01041666 RI .00776042 RI .00218750 RI .00026042 RI .00010417 .00010417 RI RI .06250000 RI .87500000 WI TOTAL 1.00000000 NOTE: THIS EXHIB IS PART OF THE DIVISION_ORDLR_AND_1S_NOT TO BE REMOVED, B 1419 REC 02366500 12/29/93 15:29 $0.00 3/003 F 1369 MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK & RECORDER WELD CO, CO 931267 November 19, 1993 Mr. Bruce T. Barker Weld County Attorney P. O. Box 1948 Greeley, CO 80632 ELK EXPLORATION, INC. A SUBSIDIARY OF HS RESOURCES, INC. 216 -SIXTEENTH STREET SURE 1400 DENVER, COLORADO 80202 (303) 572-1400 TELEFAX (303) 572.3411 RE: HSR Hammer #6-2 To ship 3 North. Range 66 West. 6th P.M. Section 2: S/2NW/4 Weld County, Colorado Dear Mr. Barker: Pursuant to your letter of October 25, 1993, wherein you cannot find your interest in the referenced well and lands, please find a copy of the Oil and Gas Lease dated April 29, 1970. According to the lease, Weld County owns an interest in the E/2NW/4 of Section 2 and therefore owns a portion of the S/2NW/4 in the SE/4NW/4. Also enclosed is a copy of the Division Order for another well located in Section 2 that was executed by Weld County. Weld County has an interest in the NE/4NW/4. I hope this information helps you locate this property so that the Division Orders can be executed and returned as soon as possible. Please contact our office if you have any additional questions. Sincerely, ELK EXPLORATION, INC. HALSEY Land Department MKH Enclosures 931267 ELK EXPLORATION, INC. A SUBSIDIARY OF MS RESOVNCES. INC. 218 -SIXTEENTH STREET SUITE 1400 DENVER, COLORADO 80202 (303) 572-1400 TELEFAX (303) 672-3411 fiS CUES ^ Y „ 51 INSTRUCTIONS FOR EXECUTION OF OIL AND GAS DIVISION ORDERS Please read the following instructions carefully before signing the enclosed division order. 1. Be sure that your interest is correct. 2. Sign your name in the space provided exactly as it is shown BEFORE TWO WITNESSES. 3. Your SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER or TAX IDENTIFICATION NUMBER must be shown in the space provided. Failure to provide the number may result in a 20% withholding of your production proceeds, as required by law, and you also could be subject to a penalty imposed by the Internal Revenue Service. 4. Show the address to which checks should be mailed. 5. If the interest is owned by a CORPORATION, the division order must be signed by a duly authorized officer and attested. The corporate seal must be affixed and the title of the signing officer shown. 6. If the interest is owned by a PARTNERSHIP, the division order must be signed by the general partner or managing partner and evidence of such authority hY must be 7. If the division order is signed by anyone other than the named owner such as an AGENT, ATT V2NGT-IN-FACT, or C vlIZDa.4iI':, r. idciiw 0?-.:AhC: itj' rat. be prCPie?d. After you have completed and signed the division order, please return the original to us in the enclosed envelope. The copy is for your records. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. JO ANN DUELER ELK EXPLORATION, INC. 216 SIXTEENTH STREET, SUITE 1400 DENVER, CO 80202 (303) 572-1400 931267 0\1(1% Wilk COLORADO Ms. Jo Ann Dubler Elk Exploration, Inc. 216 16th Street, Suite 1400 Denver, CO 80202 October 25, 1993 RE: HSR Hammer #6-2 OFFICE OF COUNTY ATTORNEY PHONE C303)3564000 Ca 4.97 P.O. Box 194 GREELEY, COLORADO 80632 Dear Ms. Dubler: We have reviewed the Division Order for well HSR Hammer #6-2. Our records do not indicate any leases for the south half of the northwest quarter of Section 2, Township 3 North, Range 66 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. Please confirm this legal description. A copy of the Division Order is enclosed for your reference. Very truly yours, rTh -Brut T Baer Weld County AttorYie BTB/gb:dubler Enclosure 931267 OIL AND GAS DIVISION ORDER ELK EXPLORATION, INC. 3807 Carson Evans, CO 80820 (303) 330-0814 Each of the undersigned OWNERS guarantees and warrants he is the owner of the oil and gas interest eel out opposite his name on the reverse side hereof or the proceeds from the sale of dl, gas and hydrocarbons from the property described on the reverse side hereof, and until receipt of written notice either from Elk Exploration, Inc. ('Elk" or from us, the undonlgned owner and all other parties executing this instrument hereby authorize Elk, its successors or assigns to receive and measure such sales in accordance with applicable contractual and/or governmental rules and regulations end to give credit as set forth on the reverse side hereof. The following covenants are parts of this instrument and shall be binding on the undersigned, their successor*, legal representatives, heirs and assigns: 011: Of thereof by the carrier designated by it or by any other purchaser tO ho n Elk may ather and receive ell such oil. o!The term and shall ahe � iEln this s division order shupon im!! inr,lude all marketable liquid hydrocarbons gathered at the lease. Elk agrees to pay for the oil sold hereunder at the price received by it from the purchaser(s). the posted price In the area for oil of the same grade and gravity in the same producing field or area on the date said oil le received by the designated carrier, or pursuant to the terms of any applicable sales contract Elk is authorized to reduce the price by any gravity adjustments and truck, tanker, or pipeline transportation charges as may be charged to It by the purchaser. Should the oil sold hereunder be resold by Elk to another purchaser accepting delivery thereof at the same point at which it takes title, Elk agrees to pay for such oil based upon the volume computation made by such purchaser and at the price received by Elk for such oil, reduced by anytransportation or gravity charges deducted by such purchaser. Quality and quantity shall be determined In accordance with the conditions specified In the price posting. Gas: Settlements for gas shall be based on the net proceeds realized by Elk from the sale thereof for all volumes as measured at the meter run(s) on the spacing unit described on the reverse side hereof in accordance with Elk's gas purchase contracts applicable to the lands after deduction of a fair and reasonable charge for compressing, fractionation. conditioning, or other process making it merchantable end for transportation If the gas is sold off the property. Title to the gas shall pass to Elk or any purchaser, transporter, or gatherer designated by Elk at the meter run(*) on the spacing unit or et such other place(*) as may be designated in the applicable gas sales contract(s). Where gas is sold subject to regulation by any governmental authority, the price applicable to such sale approved by such authority shall be used to determine the net proceeds realized from the sale. The term 'gas' shall be deemed to Inc3ude gas, casinghead gas, gasoline and all other hydrocarbons and products recovered in the processing and conditioning of such gas. If any portion of the proceeds derived from the sale of gas Is subject to refund under any order, rule or regulation of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ('FERC) or the provisions of the Natural Gas Act or Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978 (The 'Acts'), Elk may hold without interest the portion of the proceeds subject to refund unless indemnity satisfactory to Elk has been furnished or until Elk's refund obligation has been finally determined. If any portion of the proceeds delivered from the sale of gas Is paid over by Elk under any order, rule or regulation of the FERC or the provisions of the Acts, Elk Is authorized to recover the amount of the refund applicable to the interest of each of the undersigned from future payment* or, at Elk's election, it may Invoice the undersigned therefor, plus the legal rate of interest Elk is or may be required to pay in connection with the undersigned's portion of the refund. Pooled Production: Should the oil, gas and/or hydrocarbons produced from the herein -described land ('Production") be commingled with those produced from one or more other separately owned tracts of land prior to delivery to the designated carrier(s), the commingled Production sold hereunder shall be deemed to be the Interest of the undersigned in that potion of the total commingled Production delivered which Is allocated to the herein - described land on the basis of meter readings, tank strapping or any other method generally accepted in the Industry as an equitable basis for determining the quantity and quality of Production sold from each separately owned tract, Such formula shall be uniformly applied to all owners of an Interest in the tracts of land involved. Should the interest of the undersigned in the Production from the hersln desoribed land be unitized with that produced from one or more other tracts of land, this inatrument shall thereafter be deemed to be modified to the extent necessary to conform with the applicable unitization agreement or plan and all revisions or amendments thereto, but otherwise to remain in full force and effect as to all other provisions. k. such event, the portion of the unitized Production sold hereunder shall be the Interest of the undersigned in that portion of the total unitized Production delivered which Is allocated to the herein described land and shall be deemed for all purposes to have been actually produced from said land. Settlement*: Settlements shall be made monthly by check mailed to the respective parties at the latest address known by Elk, according to the division of Interest herein specified, less any taxes required by law to be deducted and paid by you applicable to the Interest(s) set forth herein. However, if the amount due any owner Is less than Twenty-Flve and 00/100 (825.00) Dollars per month, Elk, at Its option, may defer the making of such payment until such time as the aggregate amount due exceeds said sum. Evidence of Title: The oil and gas lease or Hasse, and any amendments, ratifications or corrections thereof, under which said Production le derived, are hereby adopted, ratified, and confirmed as herein and heretofore amended, In the event any dispute or question arises concerning the title to the interest of the undersigned in said Production or the proceeds thereof. Elk will be furnished, free of cost, satisfactory abstracts or other evidence of title upon demand. Until such evidence of title has been furnished end/or such dispute, defect. or question of title le corrected or removed to Elk's satisfaction, or until indemnity satisfactory to Elk has been furnished, Elk Is authorized to withhold the proceeds of such oil or gas received and run, without Interest. In the event any action or suit Is filed In any court affecting the title to the interest of the undersigned In the herein -described land or the Production therefrom or the proceeds thereto• to which the undersigned le a psR written notice of the filing of such suit or ting the court In which the same Is filed and the title of h suit or action, action Elk willall be notbe responsible for any change of ownek by the rship in the absence of actual notice and satisfactory proof of receipt of cenotice and interest ownership thereof. Elk shall be indemnified and held harmless by each party to this division order, to the extent of each party's interest as set forth herein, from any claims, causes of action, challenges to title and judgments against tt or as a result of each party's interest or claim thereto rendered against Elk on account of receiving, purchasing, paying for ortransporting Production therefrom credited to such parry's Interest pursuant to this division order, Contingent Interests: Whether or not any contingency Is expressly stated In this Instrument, Elk le hereby relieved of any reeponelbt!iy for determining when any of the Interests herein shall increase, diminish, terminate, be extinguished a revert to Other parties as a result of the completion or discharge of money or other payments from said Interest, or as a result of the expiration of any time or term limitation (either definite or Indefinite). and, unless Elk le also the operator of the property, n e retch of an !nersete a decrsete In Productlen, or c a result CI a change In the depth, the methods or the means of Production. or as result of a change in the allocation of Production affecting the herein described land or any portion thereof under any agreement or by order of governmental authority, and until Elk receive* notice In writing to the contrary, It is hereby authorized to continue to remit the proceeds of Production without liability pursuant to the division of interest shown herein, Warranties: Working Interest Owners and/or Operators, and each of them, by signature to this Instrument, certify, guarantee and warrant for Elk's benefit and that of any pipeline or other carrier designated to run or transport said oil or gas, that all oil or gas tendered hereunder has been and shell be produced from or lawfully allocated to the herein described land in accordance with all applicable Federal, state and local laws, orders, rues and regulations, This Instrument may be executed by one Or more, but all covenants herein shall be binding upon any party executing earn* and upon his heirs, devisees, successors and assigns Irrespective of whether other parties have executed this instrument B 1371 REC 02322.971 02/24/93 15:48 $0.00 1/002 F 1694 MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK & RECORDER WELD CO, CO 931267 PURPORTED 1,,.' 'D; �A"rd Production. t ATTEST:P.0. Box 758 Witness of sigoatursClerk to Ed�Nam. Cons tonne L,Har.ert Street or Sox No. chairman BY•� Witness of tura Deputy The undersigned and each of thorn, represent, guarantee and warrant thin they are the legal owners, in the proportions set out below, of all the oil, gas and hydrocarbons produced fromthe weg(s) described below. Well Name(s): Description of Property: (Drilling and Spacing Unit] Formation(c): No. of Acres: NSA Freeland 3.2 N/2 NW/4 Section 2 Townsh€p 3 North, Range 66 West, 6th P.M. Weld County, Colorado Codall & Niobrara 80 Acres {; Credit To Division of Interest Type Board of County Commissioners Weld County P. O.8ox 758 Greeley, CO 80632 .06250000 RI Thie Oil and Gas Division Order is executed this 17th day of February , 19 93, and effective as of the dens of fast 84-6000813 Social Security (of Tax (DI Number Witness of Signature Name Witness of Signature Witness of Signature Witness of Signature Greeley, CO 80617 City, State, Zip Street or Box No. Social Security (or Tax ID) Number City, Slate, Zip Name Street or Box No. Social Security for Tax ID) Number City, State, Zip RESOLUTION RE: APPROVE TWO OIL AND GAS DIVISION ORDERS TO ELK EXPLORATION, INC. AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter. is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado. and WHEREAS. Weld County, Colorado, has received two Oil and Gas Division Orders to Elk Exploration. Inc., 3807 Carson Avenue. Evans, Colorado 80620, and WHEREAS, said Division Orders cover land more particularly described is follows: Township 3 North, Range 66 West, 6th P.M. Section 2 : NI NW} HSR Freeland J/3-2 and Fromholz //4-2 Weld County, Colorado WHEREAS, Weld County is entitled to a one -eighth royalty interest on production, and WHEREAS, in order to receive said royalty interest, Weld County must execute said Division Orders, copies of which are attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and WHEREAS, said Division Orders have been reviewed by a member of the Weld County Attorney's staff and found to be in order, and WHEREAS, the Board deems it advisable to approve said Division Orders on the parcel of land described herein. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the two Oil and Gas Division Orders to Elk Exploration, Inc., 3807 Carson Avenue, Evans, Colorado 80620, on the hereinabove described parcel of land be, and hereby are, approved. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that the Chairman be, and hereby is, authorized to sign said Division Orders. !REC S" MAR _ 8 193 9%7 I r_nn/_/ DIVISION ORDERS - ELK EXPLORATION, INC. PAGE 2 The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 17th day of February, A.D., 1993. ATTEST: Weld County Clerk to the Board BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD- COUNTY, COLORADO al • Const nce L. Harbert, Chairman BY: .1AQY/-.4_,I-e,-r ii( 2P 7r) 'Deputy Clerk to the Boast- W. H� ebster, Pr -Tem /George' Baxter . Hall -f _Au Barbara J. Kirkmeytr 930165 931267 tool: 630 'Form 88—(Producent) Kan., Oklo. a Cole. 1957 �� JIL2o1970,Ha •.idea.• a 1551537 ;;m C OIL AND GAS *CEASE TTgeca,sr INC. annelw .a.—. THIS AGREEMENT, wend tale this MM_ 29th par of April ,,70 *rnYeld County, a politigl subdivision of the State Of Colorado. by the Uoard Of County Commissioners,, Weld County Colorado, for its respective interest COQ Saatd__of f niln tY_cOp ni vi nnF . p Wial Monty ! flu.-* Hr itch .rata Colo. • YO etlMtt., Ipw«. anaLeJ aIId S 1788 r 7 Fee 5 j silts _ Are mmnver rr.l nrndn A0709. ._MnMan« relied yen, den ennead: 1 That knee. roe spa in tnelderateal of the sun of ten R. Nnrjbpll.r, in hand paid and of the aeMaAa and anneanla henal.n,r entailed hymn p.erone,ed bed be h laths .pap a. inn the dal ay On Sale leaped,e the and pet and by then presents nee hnNy grant. twee and let eeclWIn1Y Snip the Meth 1M herynn ie Mnmi inscribed pad, and, let th paapew el y part thereof With ether pal end at Mud r is an w any pan of w lanes hnmd and seas n Ipa, er prover Ina On ,ealoNni. seopnMnl and Other papers,.,r wort. intludrer eery drilling, and the drilling. mining. and op nnµrfo. p eeada,g,t and Nvrne all of the oil• nu, ta,NgMad gal. t eiMMad garotter and all ether inn are their ref nfw. a elthe l and ler Wit 1e the OtMgh,0I eq pipie han. aidlding lend tenth wnig OM building power elation•• elepl,iM line and steer aMreHWn lhnean nertesa wavers. Gene .r uwlfwOtly with Smattering lands. to preen. Ian, Late fare el. and nenufa«Yd all 0f such • yelanun, and ler honing and bearding erepeytn, MN Men of land with any rennionary rights therein wing anuatn In the County of Weld g,an ,LColorado and anerlwd as teens: Township 3 North.. Rance 66 West mrti on 2' E3a*f r Cyst -tint Pei• 571.hi,yy-..,... • In Section a..... Tontine Z?. Range _.XYY the tenanted lea ern mo• re ..Inn . b I, It iv agreed that this Non snail Finn in full lore for t nth of five. es.) «en thee this Or the.V then Of then M piwt.d teat said land tar than lands with white sale land se nwnmNatedt ena. and as tone pedoor p Y d, w the p/InYed N age bring 4ytNNd operated, I. to thedean to the d the V to and NN .hen hpip and tan: • ad sawed r • Spa or low. I/tt at meth In the pipe Ilse I. .non 1«•n may e0nlltd lib wells. the w,IN etltyNwll Ilia Pan of W MI pa.dyord end Shp lea w Sand preml.sa, bell. . IfTghher aall go monthly d jn a rd u royalty ea god alwteted feel nth well *here w my le loth& Onnelg th f lbl Of the Neneda If meld ad the - Of w pIf marketedgen reebM premiers, then aw,MMh that of ha market with at w Well, The eseee Mall pay the Irma: is. aeVNnN IM,, •the p at w by the lemon Iron the man of aNNghead gas. Naduhe from any en well; it. ew.hghfn tilt al the vein at the *teeth of w wen. 7 Seed a the t carte lwngr maven prig, OF the easeigMa gad, panned front any eu well and end W Mw ell the Sued Ntelm ter ear sonnet Or 4 manses of and pm by the Mon for penpems other than the drnephtnt and operation tenet I.m er than Nye the privilege at he an Via end using en Ma any gag well en ran tend for anon and mode lights in the principal devilled Mewed en the leased premises by raking ms on J aennerl.n Ninth Whore gas flees a well or wells. epee of phduaeg M Only. M not sold or used for a 'I . then Wish pay or Mont am ?mkt an maorin. Vital delay MOMl a prided la pttaeraph ht hereof payf ie annually n the annlw ry dam ofrked Of the fth y lean following the end of nth wan year Chinn goa e en Mild or nth, and whiln paid royally e se path Or tendered MM Ina than le MN as e prodded Nepefly ender gore graph numbered awe haeaef I. Op.1 �jrtt If eratlm4 ran the ethane of a eau for ell Or gas an an net mmnen geld land en or talent the_ 9t•Ie, Of April I. 71 IAN Maw Moll MmNW a M nn1h parties, unlee. the Math shall en or before hid date pay or tender la the Mfenn or t« the -card f`f C"ounty room iaai onprt>�a (;*nisi e.. Cwt ozy{U, "`ZlC 5,,ux(if$ to wren me the saw's situ, tnd email sedunpe ae w depettawy of any" and all one payee,. under this Sate •/Sea n. of Pa n' r. of enterable ayes M. we. chasm of . Olden . In son th lerste and a n.m ell Mel w w La w rental, to reseed n.MMNme the w.am of One Nupdred r a �y t NG ear.004a.mea wand liall ell. as a sad and e t the Menage a of 4Nl as w aesng map to ,. u be d for a rot like ler b sepal laid year. La er meaner and upon her w es or r fie' than w asayawnr t$ reoi,m it for drilling may flintier the ena tor Ire mina ether direct nth payment/ w •ideas thy be made by theta a penal inter e or as anther Nonni a.l w delimited a w wlere •slats panty ens. .limn ton I. the p' a amine er t aid sat a he', ..Y ant h a iNenma and agreed that aI wd1edt'o fits nailed pang at down paymm4 turn an and •er ris granted N the as. .ban aid Ml renal is payable d as epwttaN, r. plan the far 'o.,' , a e a ow relines that a north a aforesaidpanne or thy a all bated er ib d Lessee and ninny a any Oa •der t IN deliver o nth p, se pow of rpa, Oberelease w teem mraati as the a menthe rofe the t, an Ma«I.N preeithe end payable be5tMr shall be rennin ha the portion Or n at and be dW<yd of all ,nit redo a to lM reline rya.aa, , AM thereafter w rentals NOpentea that w aenaF severed MrMI u redwsd by aid aleW w ninth, within tweea. ..menthed the filet well drilled en w Mere aesla nd nd be • dry hell, then, and in that scant, if p mete won M net emnered on said ins that expiration of the Ma rental pence tar Vieth tonal has tem paid. the Wee null 4I«wte le le aid partite, thine the Iessee ea or before the Iapeaan of aid Inlet ante spelt ascend tee payaena of neee In the raer Meant and N the pane Manner a hertealen o• i ed Ian provided, nth la IsW w Mtn ththat ereat alma the minnow in Moe mist a most• mere and on of the poyinent ref renal.. as above Awn nee m the tma in Wm t^gesnthe Wpadm is herMf. governing w 1, If and Saar web a ns. molest la the awe described land than the entin`and undivided fee slmW Meta wen. len the runes and rentals herein penned Jell be paid w teen *WY In the proportion which his intern{ bears te the whole and 'mended In, Hoarser, wish renal Nan be N. enamel at the ana •u eedlnp renal ennin may after arty nmerltn ban we cower an a neaten. a, TM then Nall With and right as we. ore of nat, ea. ell and eater found on .«n land ler its oar.lMna therm. eaepl tinter born the rely ef the aid knee, en wed meby Mew, ewe ee than bury W pt Ple drilted pier line below plow depth and Well On Ier dsmen anted by is Operations 4 growing nobs the rite in any ttme during er nte the ninetithaneth PM fen MM N dew Es the hone of~ all nrn iesMner,,w on Nletu e r Mdse, Wed nut n and ethee V tee eerr aw..e Mad Y« pewees, miaowing the r4ae te d'a and veneer alt canna. lama ands, span the awnplllon or fly ten au • dryry We w thee lithe ciao mama d predseing inn, a resew Ile premal le war oriental anthera near o Drachmae and an remove all entallaadfd Within O reasonaaale lime. n/ My N the if the Nef ninths..oatte of *newton«waparty hereto is mdnediand the anthem of seething in whole or to part te hpfwf> elNwed.,w Newnan Mpn/ Man tenth to under e. Mw .hall bed iotnraYI6 alasrrs. and mamas, but no <anee of ewnedep in the Mad or In the ratan or royalties er any euln ado nder ie M se then e en {M befit until It bee been Welshed with either the Original reeef,d thinned Si Mpnee w • duly eentfled es administrator for the et4 of tanyhe Illof any angered am.demand andowner ldoM«r ana m Of the probate thereat. Or certified espy of the pNwepdet ebonite appointment 4I sled bans {beryl N thawing paea4N, together en ell Original molded lnwon is of eenvpyNes er duly an. Weft belw sultan of and doeathawishall apaeid chin W pad aft N thaw to the fell In non tinned. and all khan* payments at rentals sae MM t > era er Indirect keeling, imam. dales. adaNllrµat, fanner, or heir el I<mr. 10. It I. heresy ninth toll In the event this Mad Mall be enlenod as ter a part or as to path Of the above deathbed land and lM polder or other ef any MM. pan or pans *eau mate default N the panacea of the popandN4 pen el the rent due from hen are the, n44 *Inn Mall net operate d defeat in elan this Mesa ewfar as it genre • part of e.d land moon which the lessee or any buew hernf than make des payment of said enntals. Upon the termination of this lease in whole or in part by election or by failure to mE%e payments as aforesaid, lessee or his assigns shall within 30 days release by written instrument the land or portion thereof which said lease terminates, and said notice shall also be sent to the lessor giving the book and page of said lease. It is expressly understood that this lease is subject to and controlled by any law of the State of Colorado now in effect restricting or limiting the powers of Counties or boards of..County Commissioners and provision herein in conflict therewith shall be inoperative and void. In t.unterpartt. each to han the She effect as i.e OrslNr. ( see atte het reicc e et) 1H Mal' NflS Whalen we Mtn he day and ye., firm above wnhN. ana WLLa j. IT Tr ES, by,... 1/iJq...n.I , 1 4 ,-) County 'C1 r): it Re-Cilnier cl..QyC‘CV0 pou..! County C►_tk weld County , n'politiCal subdivision of the State Of Colorado, by the Board Of' CnnntY r by by 3Y* -cr 931267 ._ 1551537 BOOK 630 INDIAL(S) AC, WLEDGFJ.IENT (Colorado, Nebraska, STATE OF Colorado 'M/ �ssVIW Wyoming, Utah. Kanas'tNortli Dakota. South Dakota, sfoataaa. 3 .3 COUNTY OF ri o , l9 7.— , before me personally appeared On 1 1 arson 3S t}.. air.( c� F P.a�-.,un . r;).+nn aliir..�n unrn)d xnd-5�n MSY�Rl rifd rOMmiSelnnrrs to me known to be the persons) described in sad whose names) is (sae) subscribed and who executed the foregoing instrument and ackoowledged to me that he (she) (they) duly executed the same as his (her) (their) free and voluntary act and deed. including the relents and waiver o the right of homestead. the said wife (wives) having been by me fully apprised of her (their)A,(F) end effect of signing and • owledging the said instrument. Given under my hand and seal die day and yearrllastad, Totten. ` Cv O My Commission Expires STATE OF COUNTY OF On 1 1 xc t: I NUIVIDUAL(S) ACKNOWLEDGEMENT (Coloridt.. ebraaker Wyoming. Utah, Kansas, North Dakota, South Dakota 'dOniaer , 19— • before me personally appeared to subscriuted e oregoing me known to be the that he (aslliescribed in mid e) (they) Jul) execltMC uted thetsaint` J. .41 ia 6i't (her) (their) f ee and voluntary yJtactfand deed.tinclu n. the release and waiver of the right of homes oud. die snit, wile (wives) having) been and sealy theday add year prised of r (their) ht ) right(s) ". effect of signing and acknowledging the said instrument. (lye.. under ray My Commission Expires: Notary Public Residing at: 1NDlVllw•Ala S, A(:KV(ynl.liDGEMENT (Colorado. Nebraska. STATE OF i• ." Wyoming, Utait. Kansus, North Dakota, South Dakota. ?bntan.. COUNTY OF r On ln__, before me personally appeared to known to be te ante(s) i• 'ate) subst•ibet.1 and who executed foregoing instrument and acknowledged toime that heont•) (she) (they) duly executeddescried in aud whose' die same as his (her) (their) free and vol set sad deed. including the ) effect of s signinwaiver of the right of g and acknowledging thhomestead, said iostrhe mnen . (aid Circe under havingbhad en andd seme fal fully a Jay and year last abo ehwi written. My Commission Expiter OIL AND GAS LEASE I a STATE OF COUNTY OF On I - r U 1 Notary Public Residing at: o ate o cv a; s CORPORATE ACKNOWLEDGE\I EIT (Colorado, Nebraska, Wyoming, Utah, Kansas, North Dakota. South Dakota, Moetaaa. , 19 , before me personally came die above named (who being by raw duly nom, did say that he is the President of rhos) who is personally known me a corporation, and that the seal affixed to said instrument is the corporate seal of said corpora Pro is said k own to oq to be the identical person and officer whose name is affixed to the above instrument sot sad acknowledged the instrument to be his free and voluntary act and deed and the free act and deed said son and voluntary of potation; that said corporation executed said instrument and that said insument was executed, signed sad sealed o said corporation by authority of its Board of Directors or by authority of its DysLaws. My Commission Exptreat i .....�......+�+r,..� ve, -..... Notary Public Residing at: RESOLUTION RE: APPROVE CANCELLATION OF PAYROLL FUND WARRANTS WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County. Colorado. pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, certain General Fund Warrants in the total amount of $1,208.66 for July of 1993, $2,655.07 for August of 1993, $416.03 for September of 1993, $6,533.21 for October of 1993, and $10,173.24 for November of 1993, have been issued in error, or the amounts for which they were drawn have otherwise been changed, and WHEREAS, a list of the specific warrant numbers, dates, names and amounts is on file with the Accounting Department, and WHEREAS, the Board deems it advisable to approve the cancellation of said warrants. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that those General Fund Warrants for the month of July 1993, in the amount of $1,208.66; for the month of August 1993, in the amount of $2.655.07; for the month of September 1993, in the amount of $416.03; for the month of October 1993, in the amount of $6,533.21; and for the month of November 1993, in the amount of $10,173.24, be, and hereby are, cancelled and held for naught. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 13th day of December, A.D., 1993. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County Clerk,to the Board BY: Deputy Clerk to the ;o APPROVED AS TO FORM: Barbara J. Kir .. eyer CC: AC. 931268 COLORADO 77176 rEmoRnnDum To CSC TO THE BOARD Otte ACCOUNTING DEPARTMENT From PAYROLL VOID GRANTS FUR THE MONTH Subix<: WILL YOU PLEASE ENTER A 1sSOLLTION FOR THE FOLLOWING FT RRANT CANCELLATIONS FOR PAYPOLL FUND; FOR THE NI)NTS OF 1 Ly zrr TEM ma= OF %;08. ((i(e . THANK YOU, SIGNATURE 931:21,8 << rEMORAflDUf WUDc To ACODUNTING D AR R NP COLORADO From Subject Dan PAYROLL VOID WARRANTS FOR THE YONTH 4 WTEL YOU PLEASE ENTER A RESOLUTION FOR THE FOLLOWING WARRANT CANCELLATIONS FOR PAYROLL WD; FOR THE YOUTH OF PS �� IN THE ANAUVi T OF 1�p 55 l / THAN= YOU, SIMATURE 931269 <<� mEmoRAln®um WhDc. ro ACNUNTING DF�A 7T CiO1A�A.p[) From Subject Oat. PAYROLL VOID WARRANTS FOR THE MONTH WILL YOU PLEASE ENTER A RESOLUTION FOR TEE FOLIOWING WARRANT CANCELLATIONS FOR PAYFOLL FUND; FOR THE NDNTH OF 5 IN THE ANDmT OF THANK YOU, SIWATURE r 931269; Asa Ellie. COLORADO Yo mEmoRAnuum CERIC TO THE BOARD From BUNTING DEPARTMENT PAYROIL VOID WARRANTS FOR THE NDNIIi Subject: WTLL YOU PLEASE ESTER A RESOLUTION FOR THE FOLLOWING WARRANT CANCELLATIONS H �ATIONS FOR PAYROLL FUND; FOR THE IDNT OF�TtD�3t�'L IN THE AMOUNT OF (4 S3 3, 1 THANK YOU, SIGNATURE r 931268 mEmoRAnDum To CLERK TO TEE BOARD Oats From ACCOUNTING DEBAR= Subject: PAYROLL VOID WARRANTS FOR THE MONTH p WILL YOU PLEASE ENTER A RESOLUTION FOR THE FOLLOWING WARRANT C4NCECLATIONS FOR PAYROLL FUND; FOR THE VORIS OF i / - Gam IN TEE AbDUN'T cF/( / 73 JZ-/ THANK YOU, _T12L SIGH 4R237142e RESOLUTION RE: DENY MOBILE HOME PERMIT NO. 1873 - MARTINEZ WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, on the 24th day of November, 1993, considered the request of Vincente G. Martinez for a mobile home to be used as a principal dwelling, and WHEREAS, said mobile home is to be occupied in an A (Agricultural) Zone District on a parcel of land being more particularly described as follows: Lot 3, Block 24, Aristocrat Ranchettes, Weld County, Colorado WHEREAS, at the meeting on November 24, 1993, said matter was continued to December 13. 1993, to allow staff time to verify whether or not water is available to said property, and WHEREAS, at the meeting on December 13, 1993, the Board of County Commissioners, having heard the testimony, finds that said request should be denied subject to the following reasons: 1. The owner did not submit sufficient evidence to prove that water may be supplied to the lot in such a manner as to be adequate in quality, quantity and dependability for the proposed use. 2. The Fort Lupton Planning Commission does not support approval of said request. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the request of Vincente G. Martinez for permission to place a mobile home to be used as a principal dwelling on the above described parcel of land, which was found to be in compliance with Section 43 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, be, and hereby is, denied subject to the hereinabove listed reasons. B 1424 REC 02371428 01/28/94 16:08 $0.00 1/002 F 1547 MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK & RECORDER WELD CO, CO 931273 P O Cn' CC ; PG; t/L; MAtr/K ZPMH #1873 - MARTINEZ PAGE 2 The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 13th day of December, A.D., 1993. ATTEST: ✓� 1 ) x P u7ilz' 'i7- JV �(.' % ✓1l Weld a unt}* leak to the Board BY: V • eputy.,C)e APPROVERS '[0`P` / County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO K. all . e/P f iLdM Barbara J. Kirkm yer B 1424 REC 02371428 01/28/94 16:08 $0.00 2/002 F 1548 MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK & RECORDER WELD CO, CO 931273 RESOLUTION RE: ACTION OF BOARD CONCERNING MOBILE HOME PERMIT #1873 - MARTINEZ WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County. Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, on the 24th day of November, 1993, considered the request of Vincente G. Martinez for a mobile home to be used as a principal dwelling, and WHEREAS, said mobile home is to be occupied in an A (Agricultural) Zone District on a parcel of land being more particularly described as follows: Lot 3, Block 24, Aristocrat Ranchettes, Weld County, Colorado WHEREAS, at said hearing on November 24, 1993, the Board, after hearing all of the testimony and statements of those present, deemed it advisable to continue said matter to. 13. 1993, at 9:00 'a.m., to 'allow staff time to verify whether or not water is available to said property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that this matter be, and hereby is, continued to December 13, 1993, at 9:00 a.m. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 24th day of November, A.D., 1993. ATTEST: .0/ / /vi/ Weld County Clerk to the Board BY: A,9� �h'��X4�__ Deputy Clerk to the Board. APPROVED AS TO FORM: nt torney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WEL,COUNTY, COLORADO sQ?71ra/.rl1 Constance L. Harbert, Chai ,r M /kip, W. H. Web ter, Pro-Tem EXCUSED George E. Baxte Dale . Hall EXCUSED Barbara J. Kirkmeyer Ail ofS. ,e/CC ' /f A,/4_ 931217 9131273, To: Board of County Commissioners ZPMH-1873 Applicant: Vincente C. Martinez Date: October 20,2993 9: 22 CL=« This request is for 1 mobile home to be used as a " ^� principal dwelling Legal Description of Parcel: Lot 3, Block 24, Aristocrat Ranchettes, Weld County, Colorado. Location: Southeast of Weld County Road 18 and Weld County Road 31. The Department of Planning Services staff has reviewed this request and recommends that the request be approved for the following reasons: WILL NOT WILL v X COMMENTS: x Be compatible with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. Be compatible with the surrounding area. Be in -harmony with the character of the neighborhood. Adversely affect the immediate area. Be adequately served by water and sewage disposal facilities. X Adversely affect the general health, safety, and welfare of the :.nhabitants of the area and the County. Staff has received several phone calls from surrounding property owners in objection to this request. The Department of Planning Services' staff recommendation for approval is conditional upon the following: 1. The applicant applying for a building permit for the mobile home prior to locating the mobile home on the property. 2. Prior to the occupancy of the mobile home, the mobile home shall be connected to an approved septic system and a legal water supply. 3. The mobile home shall not be occupied until such time that the applicant has complied with Conditions 1 and 2 above. Moni a Daniels -Mika, C rrent Planner 931273 931217 931273 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES 1400. N. 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 Phone 353-3845, Ext. 3540 IMPORTANT - Complete all items on both sides. Mark boxes where applicable. ZONING PERMIT MOBILE HOME APPLICANT VICENTE G. MARTINEZ PHONE (303) 857-2091 ADDRESS 15236 COLORADO HIWAY 52 FORT LUPTON, COLORADO 80621 OWNER VICENTE G. MARTINEZ PHONE (303) 857-2091 ADDRESS 15236 COLORADO HIWAY 52 CITY - STATE - �zP FORT LUPTON, CO. 80621 LCT 3 PulEVS'r6JCKAT RANCHETTES LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1/2 OF 1/2 N.W.1 /4 S.W. 1/4 'Section 3 , T 1 N, R 66 W. Total Acreage ONE Application for zoning permit is made for: Staff Approval ❑ Temporary Use During Construction of a residence Temporary Storage Board of County ❑ Use Beyond 18 of a residence ❑ Extension Beyond Storage ❑ More than one MH O More than one MH 'an Office Commissioners Approval months During Construction 6 months for Temporary as Accessory to Farm as Accessory Use as -❑ More than one MH as Accessory Use in ' C or I Zone District d Temporary Use during Medical Hardship ❑ More than one accessory structure ® Principal Dwelling The above requires an Application fee of 5165.00 The above requires an Application fee of $190.00 TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL [l Public or private company: ® Septic Tank — Permit # 920294 Copy Attached: Yes ® No DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES USE ONLY TYPE OF WATER SUPPLY ® Public or private company: A.R.W.P. INC. • Q Individual cistern) Well Permit # Copy Attached: Yes ® No 4 ZONING DISTRICT ZONING PERMIT NUMBER APPLICATION FEE PAIDI/)/a NN((�/ RECEIPT NUMBER/9947 DATE g/(510//q3 CHAINDEXED APPROVED BY: ❑ Staff O Board of County Commissioners Hearing Date ISSUED BY: DATE MOBILE, HOME BUILDING PERMIT NUMBER DATE ISSUED 331273 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 1400 NORTH 17TH AVENUE GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 AUGUST 25, 1993 RE: ZONING PERMIT (FOR.A MOBILE HOME) I VICENTE G. MARTINEZ ON THIS DATE AUGUST 25. 1993 REQUESTING A PRINCIPAL DWELLING PERMIT FOR A MOBILE HOME FOR THE PREMISES WHICH ARE KNOWN AS 15947 CAROLINE AVENUE IN THE SUB -DIVISION ARISTOCRAT RANCHETTES BEING ALSO KNOWN AS LOT NUMBERED_) IN BLOCK NUMBERED 24, IN FORT LUPTON, FOR THE PURPOSES OF IMPROVING THE LAND AND A POSSIBLE SALE. VICENTE G. MARTINEZ 5236 COLORADO HIWAY FORT LUPTON.5 COLORADO 0621 (303) 857-2091 93127 /3 J I', NANC7 ALE 2 3 Oat P's 04 Nit Alilre-c go' tS9s' "ICAIohi'itt In covI AN�i N G pica L ; N,thi Vt. w s E. an s- 93 PERMIT INFO: OWNER OWNER ADDR: SITE ADDR: LEGAL DESC: SUBDIV. USE TYPE: SERVICES: BSMT/PLMB FEE PAID INSTALLATION PERMIT 0 9202.94 OFF(F/G) 0 PERMIT' TYPE N PERMIT STATUS A MARTINEZ, VICENTE C. STREET 15236 HWY 52 CITY FT LUPTON STREET'15947 CAROLINE CITY FT LUPTON PT1 SW4 PT'2 ISIS DATE 102692 SYSTEM TYPE T PHONE 330 8572091 STATE CO ZIP 80621 0000 AVE STATE CO ZIP 80621 0000 SEC 27 TWNSHP 02 RNG 66 ARISTOCRAT RANCHETTES. LOT. 00:,: BLK 024 FILING 000 RCS Y COM N INST N OTHER N DESC MOBILE Hunt_ PERS 004 BATH 1.00 LOT SIZE. 1.00 BEDROOMS 03 N WATER SUPPLY ARIST VP** 0000000 ' SIGNED DATE 102692 Y AMT.PAID .150.00 OWNER/SIGN.BY VICENT G. MARTINEZ SPECS: PERC DATE ',CRC RATE (MIN/IN) 0.0 WATER DEPTH FT. 7: GRD.SLOPE 00 DIRECTION ENGR.DSGN.RCG. TANK CAP TRENCH SQ.FT 0000 ADDL.TERMS 100YFP 'EVALUATOR EVAL.DATE FINAL EVALR. FINAL DATE BOH(A/D) ICC'D BY 0030 ENGINEER SOIL(S/U) BED SO.FT 0000 INSTALLER BOH DATE 'TATE PERMIT - PF1 ETIJRN TO BROWSE - PF4 PRINT PERMIT - PF2' RETURN TO MENU _ PF8 RETURN TO BROWSE MENU - PFS RETURN TO MAIN MENU - PF12 9312'731 Date _ ARISTOCRAT RANCHETTES WATER PROJECT Inc. 15841 Dale Ave. Ft. Lupton, Colorado 80621 Greetings; This is to confirm that there is aworking water tap on oc LOT BLOCK If you have any questions, please call the bookkeeper at 857-4210. Thank you. (22b1 )44(14- OPEIOU #5 SJT 7-87 9312'73 -,,t3030511, State of Colorado Deed 401213366 08/24/92 09:09 AM REAL ESTATE RECORDS 81,54 CHARLOTTE HOUSTON BOULDER CNT? CO RECORDER This Deed, Made this TWELFTH day of AUGUST 19.92 between JACK KEMF ALTY ry of Housing and Urban Development.9f washingtan. D.C.. party of the first part, and VICENTE G. MARTINEZ, IN SEVE2 • pany(ics) of the second part. WHOSE LEGAL ADDRESS IS: 15236 HIGHWAY 52 FRT LUPTON, CO W'itnesseth: That the said party of the first part, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten DORM'S and other considerations. to the said party of the firstpan in hands)good hereby and valuable ons paid by the parteof the rat. part. [hell. ot nd is fito erxd and acknowledged. has gr,,n[ed, bargained, sold and conveyed and by these presents does grant. bargain, sell. convey and confirm unto the said party(its)of the second part, HIS heirs and assigns• forever. the following described lot, piece or parcel of land situate in the County of WELD . State of Colorado, to wit: HFI712-92 051-342653-203 / 'I 2'f STALEDOCU$ aRARTFEE LOTS 3 AND 4, BLOCK 24, C ARISTOCRAT RANCHETTES, INC. AUG 2 4 1992 SUBDIVISION, EXCEPT THE EAST 71 FEET THEREOF. Q '1 COUNTY OF t'IELD, STATE OF COLORADO. $ 1/ ?3 cJ ALSO KNOWN AND NUMBERED AS: 15977 CAROLINE AVENUE, FORT LUPTON, CO 80621 C B 1350 REC 02303050 09/10/92 09:28 $10.00 1/002 F 1491 MARY ANN FEUERST£IN CLERK & RECORDER WELD CO, CO ((.3 U Being the same property acquired by the party of the first part pursuant to the provisions of the National Housing Act. as amended U (12 U.S.C. 4 1701) and the Department of Housing and Urban Development Act (42 U.S.C. 4 3531). Together with all and singular the hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto belonging. or in any wise appertaining, and the reversion and reversions. remainder and remainders, tents, issues and profits thereof: and all the estate. right, title. interest, claim and demand whatsoever, of the said party of the first part. either in law or equity, of. in and to the above bargained premises, with the hereditaments and appurtenances: To Have and To Hold the said premises above bargained and described with the appurtenances unto VICENTE G. MARTINEZ • the said party(ie) of the second part. HIS heirs an assigns forever. Subject to All covenants. restrictions. reservations. easements, conditions and rights appearing of record: and Subject to any state of facts an accurate survey would show. RlAS nd the said party of the first part. for himself and his successors, convenanrs and agrees to and with the said nannies) of the second pan. heirs and assigns, the above bargained premises in the quiet and peaceable possession of the said party(ies) of the second pan. HIS heirs and the said party oigs. against all and every person or persons lawfully claiming or to claim the whole or any part thereof. by, through or the first pan, to Warrant and forever Defend. • In Witness Whereof the undersigned has set his hand and seal as DESIGNEE FOR THE DIRECTOR OF REGIONAL ROUSING , HUD Office. Denver, Colorado, for and on behalf of the said Secretary of Housing and Urban Development under authority and by virtue of 35 Fed, Reg. 16106 (10114/70) as amended. , Witnesses: Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Hy:.._.ittickSkik.A.1..-.....s. , ^�yy _,Ii...b (SEAL) Catherine Y. Argu lo, Pro6htim Analyst (rimE) HUD Office, Denver. Colorado CJ MUD -91805 (10415) NAMES OF OWNERS OF PROPERTY WITHIN 500 FEET Please print or type NAME ADDRESS, TO'.'N/CITY, STATE AND ZIP CODE ASSESSOR'S PARCEL IDENTIFICATION Q pap & CATHERINE ADAu & DONNA LAURENCE & MARY CROSS SEYMOyyUANE NANCY JANE SEYMOUR ORVILLE & LOU E. TINNLN MARIA ADELIDA ALDERETE • MANUEL & NELLIE RUST CUSTOM FLATTENERS RONNIE & PAULA MORGANFLASH FLCRYANCIC TENA KAY FLORYANCIC MARTINHZG. ANNIE F. PEREZ ARNOLD & KIMBERLY MILLER ARNOLD & KIMBERLY MILLER WICKLOW DOROTHY JOHN & ALBERTA MANSFIELD MANSFIELABERTA 7665 PATRICK ST. FORT LUPPT_OyyN. CIIO. FOftT9LJP OCT.!T: ANN FO≥TSCUPMCNERCVE. 430 MADISON ST. DENVER, CO. 80206 433 PARK POINT DR.#200B GOLDEN, CO. 80401 9Q7 PACIFIC FL FORT LUPTON; CO. 621 CODY ST. LAKEWOOD, CO. 80215 FORTOLUP ONAVCO. P.O.BOX 26 DACONO. CO. 80512_ 15819 LAMB AVE. FORT LUPTON, CO. 15857 CAROLINE AVE. FORT LUPTON, CO. 15857 CAROLINE AVE. FORT LUPTON, CO. 15236 HIWAY 52 PORRgT LUPTON C(16354 AORVADA, CO. 80004 6354 PIERSON ST. ARVADA. CO. 80002 7573 WOODRUFF FORT LUPTON, CO. 7573 WOODRUFF FORT LUPTON. CO. 15976 CAROLINE AVE. FORT LUPTON, CO. 7575•PATRICK ST. FORT LUPTON, CO. FORT LUPTONK 83: P.O.BOX 558 PLATTEVILLE, CO. 16023 HIGGINS FORT LUPTON, CO. F6RT3LUPTON;TSCO. ;6R E$6iK C0: 15126 HWY 52 FORT LUPTON CO. 130927116005 130927109003 ✓ V 130927109002 130927109001 ✓ 130927109004 V 130927110005 v 130927110006 ✓ 130927110007 ✓ 130927110004 130927115006 130927115007 130927115004 ✓ 130927115005 130927118007 130927118006 ✓ 130927118004 ✓ 130927118005 130927117006 130927117003 130927117004 V RODAAWANE & CARL WHITT D. ROBERT & JOYCE MLS DANIEL A.I A om^.R Two 130926000001 130926303001 ✓x 130926303002 130926304001 13O92A304nO2 9:31273 Vic AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS SURFACE ESTATE Application No. Subject Property STATE OF COLORADO ) 53. COUNTY OF WILD ) THE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn, states that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names, addresses and the corresponding Parcel Identification Number assigned by the Weld County Assessor of the owners of property (the surface estate) within ' five hundred (500) feet of the property subject to the application. This list was compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor, or an ownership update from a title or abstract company or attorney, derived from such records, or from the records of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. The list compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor shall, have been assembled within thirty (30) days o£ the a•plication submissio. date. The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to be ore me this day of (�(i(ttt WITNESS my hand and official seal. My Commission expires: I, / , 1993. otary ublic FIRST EC:1'n, BATTIK 605 4th Street Fort Lupton. Cn:orego 80,2: .55 44 931273 STATE OF COLORADO ) ) as. COUNTY OF VELD ) Mobile Hose Petition Do not sign this petition unless you ere an 'owner" of roe; property within SC0 feet of the property on which the mobile hose is proposed to be located on. An owner is a person holding fee title to reel property. tcu ars an 'owner" if you hold a contract Co purchase reel property which obligates you to pay general taxes on that property. In that instance, the seller may nor sign this petition. Ve, the undersigned owners of property within 300 feet of the property that the mobile hose is proposed co be located on, do noteeblect to the issuance ��` zoning ppernic for a mobile hone co be used as a fL/A/ edema 4. tJs //, N 64 1 Do not sign Mr. and Mrs. - sign individually. Do not sign this unless you haws read ell of the text. • Signature Mailing Address Telephone Dace of • Number Signing . 4fPA44Lce ryr.. x !iZ � b✓ t f ra R -c —j s (1,44 /Sz?LXNyp4 .j?n IS7 20�/43'e mc4 S _f A3 f- oo' y f yf-�� isy7y' �s..c �� illeetwr-a•-= 7;43: Lasiz9 412281 p 93 sow /,c$FG 9/d/g 3✓ o / Pf-7 - F •e1Z.4 JI r AGO 26"7..2.65.s ATTIDAYI2 OT beingfirst duly morn. depose and within Petition, chat each signature thereon vs. that each signature thereon is a signature of tt• be and that. to the best of my knowledge and be ..t, &_:t. •• petition wee, et the tine of signing. an "owner ..c feet of the property where the mobile SUESCRIEID AND SV. RN co before me this ;9. WITNESS my hand and official seal. My cormission expires; "'T"'" ),1445 .. . IRST SECURITY seem.. 605 4th Street Fort Lupton. Colorado 8062: /93✓ 3v 931273 Mobile Home Petition Do nor sign this petition unless you ere an "owner" of real property vithio 500 feet. of the property on which the mobile borne is proposed to be located on. An owner is a person holding fee title to reel property. IOU are an "owner" if you hold a contract to purchase real property which obligates you to pay general taxes on that pto9etty. In char instance. the seller ray not sign this petition. We, the undersigned owners of property within 300 feet of the property that the mobile home is proposed co be located on, do not cct to [be issuance s :omit Zermit for a mobile home co be used as Z, x fit a L- �/ N 7 Do not sign Mr. and Mrs. - sign individually. Do not sign this unless you have read all of the taxt. Signature Mailing Address Telephone Date Of • %umber Signing i sA Z\11,, 1MY /vl 4 $C7 -902q --?-45/ /Go ,.$7a/IP e� C eSC c. — A' , y '£mrfL.tc soL`zr ts7-mot STATE OF COLORADO ) ) as. AFFIDAVIT OF CUCULITO1 COUNTY 0y WELD beins first duly sworn. depose and say that my address is /sdy7 ("Ala 2..o.'1Q ✓ 5 that I. have circulated the within Petition, that each signature thereon vas affixed in my presence, end chat each signaturethereon is a signature of the person that is purports to be and that. to the best of my knowledge and belief. each person signing the petition vas, at the time of signing, an gwoar" of real property within 500 feet of the property where the mobile hods proposed to be located on. 1,etNIZ /ilL(Nf-/ Signature of Circulars Printed Saes !" �� "� SUISCRIEED AND SWORN to before me this Tea, day of *s(/PK.4.(Aw, 1 WITNESS my hand a official seal. My commission expires: Notar, Pubbc FIRST aIY BANK 605 4th Street Fort Lupton. Colorado $062: 931273. -- 13 111k. To COLORADO From mEmoRAnDum Weld County Planning Date September 13, 1993 Jeffrey L. Stoll. Supervisor, Environm tal SubJ.ct 4! Case Number: ZPMH-1873 Name: Ma i el£, V�#'ncente G. Environmental Protection Services has reviewed this proposal: the following conditions are recommended to be part of any approval: 1. An Individual Sewage Disposal System permit must be finalized and approved by an Environmental Protection Specialist within one (1) year of the. application date. JLS/jg-1798 r ro!:1,.r e mown 931273 September 15, 1993 Board of County Commissioners Weld County, Colorado 915 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Clip of fort Lupton P.O. 3OX 148 130 S. MCKINLEY AVENUE FT, LUPTON, CO 80821 SEP 2 31993 Weld CoentyPluala RE: Referral #'s - ZprH - 1873 - 1874 - 1875 - 1876 Commissioners: • COUNTY OF WELD (303) 857.88g{ r", At our regular Planning Commission meeting rr- the above listed Weld County Referrals were reviewed. We4wauId3� 1:43191/2,.:-..) the like to take this opportunity to express our concerns in'seveE,i areas and request some information related to the Aristocrat Ranchettes. It is the understanding of this Planning Commission that the area was originally approved for the construction of single family residences on one acre sites. Allowances were made to allow temporary use of mobile home structures during the construction period of the residences. Is our understanding correct? If so, have amendments to the original covenants been approved allowing permanent use of mobile homes as principal dwellings? In order to assist this Planning Commission in better understanding the process, we would request original covenants (approved with the subdivision) along any henfactts or other that the subdivisiones his new borderit have been ngr of Port Lupton, we are concerned with future uses. water supply is another issue of concern. Can the current system support the growth of the subdivision? Many of the one acre sites have more than one mobile home unit, which could increase the water demand. Are separate septic systems being constructed for each new dwelling (mobile or other)? what assurances are included within the covenants for cleaning septic systems? In the County's opinion, is there a need for concert related to septic systems overflowing and leaking into underground water supplies? _931273 As you can see, the City of Fort Lupton has many questions related to the Aristocrat Acres Subdivision. We are certain that the County shares our concerns and will provide the City of Fort Lupton with copies of related documentation. At this time, the City of Fort Lupton does not support approval of permits related to additional mobile home sites in the Aristocrat Acres Subdivision. With the location of the subdivision being so near our current city limits, proper operation of the subdivision is of increasing concern to the City of Fort Lupton. We wish to express our sincere appreciation for the support provided by weld County over the past several years. The working relationship between Weld County and the City of Fort Lupton has improved to a point of mutual respect and support. Your response to our concerns has been extremely supportive. we again wish to thank you for your assistance, and we look forward to a positive working relationship in the future. trton Fort Lupton Planning Commission Sincerer 931273 tfteitavoi'w' 111119€ COLORADO. DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303) 45v,645, EXT. 3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 1400 N. 17TH AVENUE GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 September 1. 1993 CASE NUMBER: ZPZ'4t-1873 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from Vicente G. Martinez for a Zoning permit for a mobile home.to be used as a principal dwelling. The parcel of land is described as Lot 3, Block 24, Aristocrat Ranchettes, Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is southeast' of Weld County Road 18 and Weld County Road 31. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by September 15, 1993 so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Greg Thompson, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: 3. We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Signed: Agency: Date: 931273 REFERRAL LIST NAME: Vicente G. Martinez CASE NUMBER: 1P.'4H-1873 REFERRALS SENT: September 1. 1993 REFERRALS TO BE RECEIVED BY: September 15, 1993. COUNTY TOWNS and CITIES Attorney Ault _.Health Department Brighton Extension Extension Service Broomfield Emergency Management Office Dacono Sheriff's Office _Eaton Engineering Erie _Housing Authority Evans Airport Authority ,Firestone Building Inspection _ L_Fort Lupton �— _Frederick STATE Garden City Division of Water Resources Gilcrest Geological Survey Greeley Department of Health Grover ^Department'of Transportation Hudson Historical Society Johnstown !Water Conservation Board �Keenesburg Oil and Gas Conservation Commission Kersey La Salle FIRE DISTRICTS +Lochbuie _Ault F-1 Longmont Berthoud Berthoud F-2 Mead �Briggsdale F-24 Milliken Brighton F-3 +New Raymer Eaton F-4 _Northglenn Fort Lupton F-5. __Nunn —�Galeton F-6 Pierce +_Hudson F-7 _Platteville Johnstown F-8 Severance —�La Salle F-9 ,Thornton Mountain View F-10 Windsor ^Milliken F-11 ^Nunn F-12 _Pawnee 1-22 Platteville F-13 Platte Valley F-14 Poudre Valley F-15 Raymer 1-2 -^Southeast Weld F-16 rWindsor/Severance 1-17 Wiggins F-18 Western Hills F-20 Central Colo. Water Conservancy Dist. r —Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. �Tri-Area Planning Commission CQUNTIES Adams Boulder T.arimer FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES US Army Corps of Engineers USDA -APHIS Veterinary Service Federal Aviation Administration Federal Communication Commission SOIL CONSERVATION DISTRICTS Brighton ^Fort Collins Greeley Longmont -^ West Adams COMMISSION/BOARD MEMBER 931273 .. y COLORADO September 1, 1993 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303) 353-3845. EXT. 3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES h%00 N.17TH AVENUE GREELEY, COLORADO 8Ce31 Vicente C. Martinez 15236 Colorado Highway 52 Fort Lupton. CO 80621 Subject: ZPMH-1873 Dear Mr. Martinez: Your mobile home zoning permit application is complete and in order and will be processed by our office on or before October 1, 1993. If it is determined that the application meets the approval criteria of Section 43 of the Veld County Zoning Ordinance and you have submitted a petition with the signatures of at least 70Z of the surrounding property owners who have no objection to your request, you will be notified that the zoning permit is approved. If the staff determines that the application does not meet the approval criteria, you will be notified and asked to appear before the Board of County Commissioners at a public hearing. You will be informed of the hearing date at least a week prior to the hearing. The Board of County Commissioners will then consider your application and make a final decision on the zoning permit for the mobile home. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to call me. Respectfully, Greg ompson Current Planner Ct/bja 931273. y ERZI F I CATS OF MAI L I NQ I hereby certify that I have placed a true surrounding property owners and owners and accordance with the notification requirements of ZPMH-1873, 1874, and 1875 for Vincente Martinez postage prepaid First Class Mail by letter as list. this 26th day of October, 1993. and correct copy of the lessees of minerals in Weld County in Case Number in the United States Mail, addressed on the attached 931273 otitt 111k. COLORADO DATE: October 21, 1993 TO: SURROUNDING PROPERTY/MINERAL OWNERS CASE NUMBER: ZPMH-1873 I DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303) 353-3B45, EXT. 3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 1400 N. 17TH AVENUE GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 There will be a Public Hearing before the Weld County Board of County Commissioners on Wednesday, November 24, 1993, at 9:00 a.m., in the County Commissioners' Hearing Room, First Floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado concerning the request of: NAME: Vincente G. Martinez FOR: A Zoning Permit for a Mobile Home to be used as a Principal Dwelling. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 3, Block 24, Aristocrat Ranchettes, Colorado. Weld County, LOCATION: The southeast corner of Weld County Road 18 and Weld County Road 31, Your property is within five -hundred request has been made or you may have the property under consideration. For Monica Daniels -Mika, Current Planner. (500) feet of the property on which this an interest in the minerals located under additional information write or telephone Comments or objections related to the above request should be submitted in writing to the Weld County Department of Planning Services, 1400 N. 17th Avenue, Greeley, Colorado 80631, on or before the date of public hearing. 933273 • SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS AND/OR SURFACE ESTATE/INTEREST OWNERS Vincente Martinez 2PMR-1873, 1874, and 1875 f,�.-./�-i. h.a ..4 'Y✓1N.YYS YT 'u,c:�w. a:r.c r... Iliidf!^.4K4.,tia.tl/tlJr4tia .C,l,dmp-,...._.... Ft. Lupton, CO 80621 Jerry and Donna Adams 15979 Nancy Avenue Ft. Lupton, CO 80621 Laurence and Mary Ann Cross c/o Michael and Francine Jenkins 654 S. Denver Avenue Ft. Lupton, CO 80621 Nancy Jane Seymour 430 Madison Street Denver, CO 80206 Nancy Jane Seymour 433 Park Point Drive #200B Golden, CO 80401 Orville and Lou Tannin 907 Pacific Place Ft._.Lupton, CO,: 80621. Maria Adelida Aiderete 621 Cody Street Lakewood, CO 80215 Manuel and Nellie Rubi 15850 Dale Avenue Ft. Lupton, CO 80621 Custom Flatteners P.O. Box 26 Dacono, CO 80514 Ronnie and Paula Morganflash 15819 Lamb Avenue Ft. Lupton, CO 80621 931273 Tena Kay Floryancic 15857 Caroline Avenue Ft. Lupton, CO 80621 Vincente Martinez 15236 Highway 52 Ft--"Lupton,-jCO-...80621 - Annie F. Perez 6354 Pierson Street Arvada, CO 80004 Arnold and Kimberly Miller 7573 Woodruff Ft. Lupton, CO 80621 James and Dorothy Wicklow c/o Cary Colley 15976 Caroline Avenue Ft. Lupton, CO 80621 John and Alberta Mansfield c/o Hurshell Malone 7575 Patrick Street Ft. Lupton, CO 80621 Vera Jane and Carl Rodman P.O. Box 558 Platteville, CO 80651 1 023 Higgins Ft. Lupton, CO 80621 n.� Robert and Joyce Mills 7486 Patrick Street Ft. Lupton, CO 80621 Daniel Martinez 15126 Highway 52 Ft. Lupton, CO 80621 931273. Lof 3 ,RONNIE & PAULA MORGANFLASH L NA KAY FLORYANCIC NAMES OF OWNERS OF PROPERTY WITHIN 500 FEET Please print or type NAME ADDRESS, TOWN/CITY, ASSESSOR'S PARCEL IDENTIFICATION # STATE AND ZIP CODE DONALD & CATHERINE 7665 PATRICKKST. FORT LUPTON; CO. CLAMP JERRY & DONNA 15979 NANCY AVE. .ADAMS FORT LUPTON, CO. LAURENCE & MARY ANN 654 S. DENVER AVE. CROSS FORT LUPTON CO. 1 4 MADISON ST. SEYMOUR DENVER, CO. 80206 NANCY JANE 433 PARK POINT DR.#200B SEYMOUR ORVILLE & nit TINNIN MARIA ADELIDA ALDERETA MANUEL & NELLIE RUBI 130927116005 13092710.9Q03 130927109002 130927109001 GOLDEN, CO. 80401 1 0.2710.00 407 PACIFIC P". FORT LUPTON CO. 621 tODY ST. LAKEWOOD„CO. CO. 80215 15850 DALE AVE. FORT LUPTON, CO. 130927110007 CUSTOM FLATTENERS P.O.BOX 26 D'CONO, CO. 80514 130927110004 r5719 LAMB AVE. FORT'LUPTON, CO. 15'857 CAROLINE AVE. FORT LUPTON, CO. 15857 CAROLINE AVE. FORT LUPTON, CO. 130927115004 VICEN'TE U. MARTINEZ 15236 HIWAY 52 MARTINEZ FORT LUPTON, CO. 130927115005 ANNIE F. PEREZ ANNIE F. PEREZ ARNOLD & KIMBERLY 7573 WOODRUFF MILLER ARNOLD & KIMBERLY MILLER JAMES & DOROTHY WICKLOW JbnN & ALBERTA MANSFIELD JOHN & ALBERTA MANSFIELD VERA JANE & CARL P.O.BOX 558 RODMAN ZELLA D. WHITT ZELLA D. WHITT ROBERT & YOYCE 7486 PATRICK ST. MILLS FORT LUPTON, CO. 130926304001 15126-HIWAY 52 FoRT LUPTON, CO. 130926304002 1 13092711 0006 130927115006 130927115007 TENA KAY FLORYANCIC 6354 PIERSON ST. ARVADA, CO. 80004 130927118007 6354 PIERSON ST. ARVADA. CO. 80004 130027118006 FORT LUPTON, CO. 130927118004 7593 i5 FORT LUPTON, CO 7575 PATRICK ST. FORT LUPTON, CO. 7575 PATRICK S.T. FORT LUPTON, CO. WOODRUFF 9 o‘‘ E. 130927118005 130927117006 130927117003 130927117004 PLATTEVILLE, CO. 130926000001 16023 HIGGINS FORT LUPTON, CO. 130926303001 16023 HIGGINS FORT LUPTON, CO. 130926303002 DANIEL MARTTPEZ u 0 d u 0 V C 00 .M 0 0) X 0 a 0 0 0 4a v y a v a ro 931273 • Mobile Notes Petition Do not sign this petition unless you are an "owner" of real property within 5C0 feet of the property on which the mobile home is proposed to be located on. An owner is a person holding fee title to reel property. You are an "owner" if you hold a contract to purchase reel property which obligates you to pay general taxes on chat property. In Chet instance, the seller may not sign this petition. F'e, the undersigned owners of property within 500 feet of the property that the mobile home is proposed to be located on. do not object to the issuance of a zoning permit for a mobile hook to be used as a Do not sign Mr. and Mrs. — sign individually. Do not sign this unless you have read all of the text. Signature STAYS OF COLORADO ) ) so. comm OF HELD ) Mailing Address Telephone Date of Number Signing AFFIDAVIT OF CIRCULATOR I. being first duly sworn, depose and say that my address is that I. have circulated the within Petition, that each signature thereon vas affixed in my presence. end that each signature thereon is a signature of the person chat is purports to be and that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, each person signing the petition was, at the time of signing, an "owner" of real property within 500 feet of the property where the mobile home is proposed to be located on. Signature of Circu tor Printed Name , ,., w• • f •ham •'rtDlA/'�y;•.en�9�SCRIBED ND SVORN to before me this R' - : e :WITNESS my hand and official se Ue ccgp '• re •......: . YOr' N.ea blip — r Cr CC'.45 My commission expires: r _ , cL1 c (lG 931273 INSPECTION REPORT NAME: Vincente Martinez CASE NUMBER: ZPKM-1987 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 3, Block 24, Aristocrat Ranchettes, Weld County, Colorado. DATE: September 22, 1993 The property is vacant at this time. The property slopes from the east to the west. The property is covered with weeds. Access to the property is off of Woodruff Street. /-c /Ke 1 . chue rrent Planner 931273 AR2371427 RESOLUTION RE: DENY MOBILE HOME PERMIT NO. 1874 - MARTINEZ WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, on the 24th day of November, 1993, considered the request of Vincente G. Martinez for a mobile home to be used as a principal dwelling, and WHEREAS, said mobile home is to be occupied in an A (Agricultural) Zone District on a parcel of land being more particularly described as follows: Lot 2, Block 24, Aristocrat Ranchettes, Weld County, Colorado WHEREAS, at the meeting on November 24, 1993, said matter was continued to December 13, 1993, to allow staff time to verify whether or not water is available to said property, and WHEREAS, at the meeting on December 13. 1993, the Board of County Commissioners, having heard the testimony, finds that said request should be denied subject to the following reasons: 1. The owner did not submit sufficient evidence to prove that water may be supplied to the lot in such a manner as to be adequate in quality, quantity and dependability for the proposed use. 2. The Fort Lupton Planning Commission does not support approval of said request. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County. Colorado, that the request of Vincente G. Martinez for permission to place a mobile home to be used as a principal dwelling on the above described parcel of land, which was found to be in compliance with Section 43 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, be, and hereby is, denied subject to the hereinabove listed reasons. B 1424 REC 02371427 01/28/94 16:08 $0.00 1/002 F 1545 MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK & RECORDER WELD CO, CO 931272 T✓(O Ts -9 P6; /!L; Awt7//YEL ZPMH #1874 - MARTINEZ PAGE 2 The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 13th day of December, A.D., 1993. w ATTEST. Weld County Cierk to the e 1D'epuLy....•: `c -c. u y, . ,w APPROVED AS TO,,Fe • ,,Y (". BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Barbara J. Kir eyer B 1424 REC 02371427 01/28/94 16:08 $0.00 2/002 F 1546 MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK & RECORDER WELD CO, CO 931272 RESOLUTION RE: ACTION OF BOARD CONCERNING MOBILE HOME PERMIT #1874 - MARTINEZ WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County. Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter. is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, on the 24th day of November, 1993, considered the request of Vincente G. Martinez for a mobile home to be used as a principal dwelling. and WHEREAS, said mobile home is to be occupied in an A (Agricultural) Zone District on a parcel of land being more particularly described as follows: Lot 2. Block 24, Aristocrat Ranchettes, Weld County, Colorado WHEREAS, at said hearing on November 24. 1993, the Board, after hearing all of the testimony and statements of those present,' deemed it advisable to continue said matter to December 13, 1993, at 9:00 a.m.:, to allow staff time to verify whether or not water is available tc said property. NOW, THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado. that this matter be, and hereby is, continued to December 13, 1993, at 9:00 a.m. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 24th day of November, A.D., 1993. ATTEST: Weld County Clerk to the Boar BY: /%Iii Deputy Clerk to the APPROVEAS TO FORM: ounty Att•rney EXCUSED BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WEL COUNTY, COLORADO Constance L. -•rb rt, Chairman . Webster, Pro-Tem EXCUSED George E. Baxt:r Dale Hall Barbara J. Kirkmeyer 931218 ea: A.; PIG f RPPL To; Board of County Commissioners Date: October 20, 1993 ZPMH-1874 Applicant: Vincente C. Martinez This request is for 1 mobile home to be used as a principal dwelling Legal Description of Parcel: Lot 2, Block 24, Aristocrat Ranchettes, Weld County, Colorado. Location: Southeast of Weld County Road 18 and Weld County Road 31. The Department of Planning Services staff has reviewed this request and recommends that the requestbe approved for the following reasons: WILL WILL NOT Be compatible with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. Be compatible with the surrounding area. Be in harmony with the character of the neighborhood. X Adversely affect the immediate area. COMMENTS: Be adequately served by water and sewage disposal facilities. Adversely affect the general health, safety, and welfare of the inhabitants of the area and the County. Staff has received several phone calls from surrounding property owners in objection to this request. The Department of Planning Services' staff recommendation for approval is conditional upon the following: 1. The applicant applying for a building permit for the mobile home prior to locating the mobile home on the property. 2. Prior to the occupancy of the mobile home, the mobile home shall be connected to an approved septic system and a legal water supply. 3. The mobile home shall not be occupied until such time that the applicant has complied with Conditions 1 and 2 above. ' ' 1 _ Monica Daniels -Mika, Current t P1 e OctQber 20. 1993 931272 931218 nalz n �3 WELbI,COUNTY DEPAtMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES 1400 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, Calorado 80631 Phone 353-3845, Ext. 3540 IMPORTANT - Complete all items on both sides. Mark boxes where applicable. APPLICANT VICENTE G. MARTINEZ ZONING PERMIT MOBILE HOME PINE' (303)857-2091 ADDRESS 15236 COLORADO HIWAY 52 FORT LUPTON. COLORADO 80621 OWNER VICENTE G. MARTINEZ PHONE (303)857-2091 ADDRESS 15236 COLORADO HIWAY 52 FORT LUPTON, COLORADO 80621 CITY - STATEFORTPLUPTON, CO. 80621 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1/2 OF 1/2 N.W. 1/4 S.W. 1/4Section OT2 rift ARISTOCRAT RANCH ETTFS 3 , T 1 N, R 66 W. Total Acreage ONE Application for zoning permit is made for:, Staff Approval ❑ Temporary Use During Construction of a residence ❑ Temporary Storage Board of County Commissioners Approval ❑ Use Beyond 18 months During Construction of a residence 0 Extension Beyond 6 months for Temporary Storage O More than one MR as Accessory to Farm ❑ More than one MH as Accessory Use as an Office 0 More than one MN as Accessory Use in C or I Zone District: ❑ Temporary. Use during Medical Hardship ❑ More than one accessory structure 0 Principal Dwelling The above requires an Application fee of $165.00 The above requires an Application fee of $190.00 TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL 0 Public or private company: © Septic Tank — Permit # 920293 Copy Attached: Yes ® No ❑ TYPE OF WATER- SUPPLY ® Public or private company: A.R.W.P. INC. I El Individual (Zae;Y};, cistern) Well Permit # Copy Attached: Yes 13 No O ur.rnFiww♦ yr rLNo•a.•.. +�•..---- --- ----- ZONING DISTRICT ZONING PERMIT NUMBER APPLICATION FEE PAID 1(]/102 RECEIPT NUMBER/ggq7 7 ``jj County Commissioners IDATE 9/1 l3 1 Hearing Date Jn7z `9 ICRAINDEXED APPROVED BY: ■ Staff 0 Board of ISSUED BY: DATE MOBILE HOME BUILDING PERMIT NUMBER DATE ISSUED 931272 r A sketch plan is required as part of the application review. Please attach a sketch plan of the site at the scale on one inch represents fifty feet or other. suitable scale to show the proposed location of the mobile, home, including distances from the property lines and ' other structures on the property; access to the mobile home, indicating whether the access is existing or proposed; location and measurements of any easements or right-of-ways; and any existing structures on the property. Sketch Plan attached: 'Yes ® No U Deed or'contract attached: Yes.23 No What housing is available on the property and what is its present use? NONE How many mobile homes are on this property at the present time? NONE TEMPORARY USE DURING CONSTRUCTION OF A RESIDENCE Building Permit Number Date Building Permit Issued Zoning Permit valid for 6 months from date of issue. Zoning Permit issued Valid from 'to RENEWALS: FIRST — From SECOND — From to Fee: Reviewed & Approved to Yee: Reviewed S Approved ACCESSORY FARM USE Type of farming operation on property: Number of Livestock `Average number per year Acres Irrigated Acres Dryland Acres Pasture _ Number of employees now employed: Full time: Part time: ACCESSORY USE IN C OR I ZONE DISTRICT Type of commercial or industrial activity on property: Number of employees: Mobile home will be used for: Full time: Part time: IGNATURE OF APPLICANTS I _ APPLICATION DATE AUGUST 26. 1993 BUILDING PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR A MOBILE HOMES IN ADDITION TO THE ZONING PERMIT FOR MOBILE HOMES. THE BUILDIN PERMIT MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE BUILDING INSPECTION DIVISION, WELD COUNTY AD INISTRATIVE OFFICES, 1400 N. 17TH AVENUE, GREELEY, COLORADO 80631, PHONE 353-3845, EXT. 3540, AFTER APPROVAL OF THE ZONING PERMIT. 9:22'72 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 1400 NORTH 17TH AVENUE GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 AUGUST 26, 19937 RE: ZONING PERMIT FOR A MOBILE HOME I VICENTE G. MARTINEZ ON THIS DATE AUGUST 26, 1993 REQUESTING A PRINCIPAL DWELLING PERMIT FOR A MOBILE HOME FOR THE PREMISES WHICH ARE KNOWN AS 7704 WOODRUFF STREET IN THE SUB -DIVISION ARISTOCRAT RANCHETTES BEING ALSO KNOWN AS LOT NUMBERED 2 IN BLOCK NUMBERED_24, IN FORT LUPTON. FOR THE PURPOSES OF IMPROVING THE LAND AND_A POSSIBLE SALE. VIQENTE G. MARTIN Z 236 COLORADO TWAY 52 FORT LUPTON, COLORADO 80621 (303) 857-2091 3 i3Loe )4 /3 9, Z 0 3 714' 0 � s Q Nancy _ ,09 .2 41< 9 N S i rA�t tAki ei3LH:.s SEPTIC PERMIT INQUIRE/UPDATE Ta •F'1SRCIIT INFO; PERMIT 92029.3 Of -E' h'/Ci i-1SPIHWO1 ( ) G PERMIT TYPE :N PERMIT Sl'APUS A • OWNER MARTINEZ, VICENTE G. ISS DAlE 102692 SYSTEM TYPE T OWNER ADDR: S 1'REET 1°,236 HWY 52 CITY FT• LUPTON PHONE 621T 0°500091 STATE SIl'E ADDR: STREET 7704 WOODRUFF ST CO ZIP S062 1 0000 CI'T'Y Fr LUPTON STATE CO ZIP :50621 LEGAL. DE C: 1'71 SW4 PT2 SEC 27,0000 SUFIDIV. ARISTOCRAT RAN,--, S TWNSHP O'. 66. CI ILL 7L , USE TYPE: RCS Y COI"I N INS'T N OTHER N D SC MOBILE FILING 000 Si ET:V)CES: PEPS 00,1 I<A(TH 1.00 SIZE IT?:il•I'1'/I'L.MLi� N LOT :1.00 BEDNOOMS 03 WATER SUPPLY PWELL BPL1 0000000' FEE PAID Y AII7.PAII) 150.00 OWNER/OIGN_JY VICEN'TE5C. MARED TI DATE XNIST'ALL.AT'ION SPECS; PERC 1)ATf. 1].0:592 WATER DEPTH 008 F1. PERC RATE (MIN/IN) 6.]. C1RI). ,L.Of-''E 01 DIRECTION W c s I NOR.DSGN.REG_ N TANK : CAP 1000 1V1t M• • ;40 , •* I� ADDL. TERMS Y Ir i . ) t i;.�l.( C•, 1UVYFP- EVALUATOR 000E VA . iglL 1' 2 F:L14AL_ EVAL.R. FINAL DATE INSTALLER RFC'D BY BOH(A/D) ROM DAIL" UU O ENOINUCN PRATE PERMIT - PFI E'i'URN\TO BROWSE 7 PF4 i ' PRINT PERMIT - PF2 RETURN TO BROWSE MENU - PFJ RETURN TO MENU - PF8 , RETURN TO MAIN MENU - PF12 931272 4 Date ARISTOCRAT RANCHETTES WATER PROJECT Inc. 15841 Dale Ave. Ft. Lupton, Colorado 80621 Greetings; This is to confirm that there is a working water tap on BLOCK oT LOT a 7/93 If you have any questions, please call the bookkeeper at 857-4210. Thank you, OPEIOU #5 SJT 7-87 531272 2300363'. �� B 1348 REC102300381-08/18/��:. 12430 ° #5.00 1/001 F 0019 NARY ANN FEUERSTEXN CURE &.RECORDER, WELD —CO ,:CO-- •— WARRANTY DEED Tills DEED, Made this 14TH day of AUGUST, 1992 between • MABEL S. WALK R I' of the County of t and Stale of �Q , grantor, and •I . VICENTE C. MARTIN ,1 whose legal address is 0236 IIICIIWAY 52, FT, LUITON, COLORADO 80621 of the County of WELD and State of COLORADO, grantee: , ll WITNESSETII. That the grantor, for and in consideration of die turn of SIX THOUSAND AND 00/100ths DOLLARS, ($6,000.00), the receipt and sufficiency of which Is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, sold and conveyed, and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell, convey and confirm unto the grantee, Ma heirs and aligns forever, all the real property together with improvements. if any, situate, lying and being in the County of WELD, and State of Colorado, described as follows: LOTS I AND 2, . Il BLOCK 24, ARISTOCRAT RANCIIETTES, Ij COUNTY OF WELD, ,I STATE OF COLORADO. •'' �t STATE DOCUMENTARY FEE Date /f -//' '9•f.- S Q.lt? t I; else known by street and number as VACANT LAND, FT. LUFTON, COLORADO $0621 TOGETHER with all and singular the hereditament' and appurtenance thereunto belonging, or In anywise appertaining and the reversion and reversions, remainder and remainders, rents, Issues and pieta thereof, and all the ciliate, right, title, interest, claim and demand whatsoever of the grantor, either in law or equity, of, in and to the above bargained premises, with the hereditamenta and appurtenances. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises above bargained and described, with the appurtenances, unto the grantee, his heirs and assigns forever. And the grantor, for himself, his heirs and personal representatives, does covenant, grant, bargain and agree to and with the grantee, his heir, and assigns, that at the time of the entailing and delivery of these presents, he is well seized of the premixes above conveyed, has good, sure, perfect, absolute and indefeasible estate of inheritance, In law, In fee simple, and has good right, Mi power and lawful authority to grant. bargain, sell and convey the same In manner and form aforesaid, and that the tame are free and clear from all former and other grants, bargains, sales, liens, Wxes, assessments, encumbrances and restrictions of whatever kind or nature saver, except (or taxes for the current year,.a Ben but not yet due or payable, easements, restrictions, reservations, covenants and rights -of -way of record, if any, .-- .. _ I The grantor shall and will WARRANT AND FOREVER DEFEND the above -bargained premises in the quiet and peaceable possession of the grantee, his heirs and assigns, against all end every person or persons lawfullyelaiming the whole or any part thereof. The singular number shall include the plural, the plural the singular, and the use of any gender shall be applicable to all genders. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the grantor has executed this deed on the date set forth above. * STATE Of CO RR ' . COUNTY OF•+».•ARAPAHOS ;II . • •II :I as. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 14TH day of AUGUST, 1992 b MABEL S W K • fi My Commission expires: 13/21/ 93 u Ne. ,M*. Roe. lit. WARRANTY DOW Var p%Magrapik Record) NAMES OF OWNERS OF PROPERTY WITHIN 500 FEET Please print or type NAME ADDRESS, TOWN/CITY. STATE AND ZIP CODE ASSESSOR'S PARCEL IDENTIFICATION i CLAMPD & CATHERINE FORE um( CO. AH4MS & DONNA FORT9LUPT8,+��H: LAURENCE & MARY ANN' 654 S. DENVERCO.AVE CROSS. SEYMOURANE 130927116005 130927109003 NANCY JANE. SEYMOUR ORVILLE & L0U E. TINNTN MARIA ADELIDA ALDERETE MANUEL & NELLIE RUBI CUSTOM FLATTENERS iZ (I P,rw.. '. RONNIE & PAULA MORGANFLASH PLORYANOIC TENA KAY FLORYANCIC ANNIE F. PEREZ ARNOLD & KIMBERLY MILLER ARNOLD & KIMBERLY MILLER JAMES & DOROTHY WICKLOW JOHN & ALBERTA MANSFIELD MANSFIELDBERTA DENVER, CO. 80206 433 PARK POINT DR.1200B GOLDEN, CO. 80401 907 PACIFIC PL FORT LUPTON;CO. 621 CODY ST. LAKEWOOD, CO. 80215 FORTOLUPHNAVCO. P.O.BOX 26 DACONO. CO. 80511 15819 LAMB AVE. FORT LUPTON, CO. 15857 CAROLINE AVE. FORT LUPTON, CO. 15857 CAROLINE AVE. FORT LUPTON, CO. 15236 HIWAY 52 PORT LUPTON CO 6354 PIERSON ST. A ADA, CO. 80004 6354 PIERSON ST. ARVADA. CO. 80004 7573 WOODRUFF FORT LUPTON, CO. 7573 WOODRUFF FORT LUPTON. CO. 15976 CAROLINE AVE. FORT LUPTON, CO. 7575 PATRICK ST. FORT LUPTON, CO. FORT DPW.' CO: P.O.BOX 558 PLATTEVILLE, CO. 16023 HIGGINS FORT LUPTON, CO. IiOR?3Lli9S sco. ;619 EiglAiK 61: 15126 HWY 52 FORT LUPTOH 00. 130927109002 130927109001 130927109004 130927110005 130927110006 130927110007 130927110004 130927115006 130927115007 130927115004 130927115005 130927118007 130927118006 130927118004 130927118005 130927117006 130927117003 vs- J SI 130927117004 RHDMANANE & CARL WHITT D. ROBERT & JOYCE MILLS DANIEL MARTINEZ 130926000001 130926303001 130926303002. 130926304001 13(1926304002 AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS SURFACE ESTATE Application No. Subject Property STATE OF COLORADO ) so. COUNTY OF WELD ) THE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn. states that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names, addresses and the corresponding Parcel'Identification Number assigned by the Weld County Assessor of the owners of property (the surface estate) within five hundred (500) feet of the property subject to the application. This list was compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor, or an ownership update from a title or abstract company or attorney, derived from such records, or from the records of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. The list' compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor shall have been assembled within thirty (30) days of the application submission date. 44 The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to bore me this .32 day of i'.[ rt4± WITNESS my hand and official seal. My Commission expires: , 1993. Ndtdryblic FIRST EC.URITY BANK 605 4th Strut Fon tup on, Cokr,do 80621 931272 • • r .. Mobilo Noss Petition Do not sign this petition unless you aro an "owner" of real property within 5C0 teen of the property on which the walls hone Is proposed to be located on. An owner is • person holding fee title to real property. You are en "owner" if you hold a contract to purchase reel property which obligates you to pay general taxes on that property. In that instance, the seller may not sign this petition. We, the undersigned owners of property within 500 feet of the property that the mobile hone is proposed to.be located on, do nor ect to the issuance coning/permit x,for a mobile home to be used as a�,f / L TM - Do I I./i A! not sign Mr. a Mrs. - sign individually. Do not sign this unless you have read all of the text. w S gnacure of C rcuist STATE OF COLORADO ) ) as. COUNTY Or WILD ) • Sigma re Nailing Address 4 Lo-z2Cd4 4.n F1 a n y Anngt-L-c4-4fA o .S1 09+5 ��s Telephone Date of Nuaber Signing - 7- 8ssr/ *CC Ss?- 99v, t e 711 on fl-Nt �aR l u a-P-fl2S' S qS. 4 xa/q3 7--�r.>i��° $s9 Pols 6 3 AYf1DAv';;T Or CIRCULATOR I. b a firs; duly /swum, .deyoso and say that ay address is :A G///%ZL�Y �P I - ., that I. have circulated 'the . within P titian, that each signature thereon vet affixed in my presence. and that each signature thereon is a signature of the person that is purports to be and that, to the beet of my knowledge and belief, each person 'signing the petition wee, at the time of signing. an "owner" of real property within 500 fe c of the property share the mobile hose is proposed to be located on. Vett., IE 4111,44t tat Printed Nan 199SUlSCRIDED AND - 'ORN to before me this .L.'..— day o .1. - WITNESS my hand and official seal. My commission expires: Notary C FIRST SECURITY BANK goy 4Ih Street Fan Lupton. Colorado 80621 93127,2 Mobile None Petition - Do not sign this petition unless you are an eownar" of real property within SCO feet of the property on which the mobile bone is proposed to be located on. An owner is a person holding In title Co real property. Sou are en 'owner^ if you hold a contract co purchase real property which obligates you to pay general caxss on chat property. In chic inatance, the seller may not sign this petition. V., the undersigned owners of property within 500 feet of the property chat the mobile how is proposed to be located on. do nokohilect to the .issuance -moa toning it for a mobile how e, to buama as a ell] „iniMit L t,�r, perm1 Do not sign Mr. and Mrs. - sign individually. Do not sign this unless you have read all of the text. • Signature Nailing Address • Telephone Date of Number Signing armor, (4-1-c3 ✓ 9ssys'i fJi/9s✓ �4no gs?1cx Lb" ./ STATE Of COLORADO ) ) se. ATYIDAYIT Or CIRCULATOR CowTS or WELD I, be s f r.c u)v .swlstm. depose and asr that .y seers•. La n7'7o ≤≤lJll ,� , that I. hat circulated "the . within Petition. chat each signature thereon vas affixed In my presenca. and that each signature thereon is a signature of the person that is purports to be and that. co the best of my knowledge and belief. each person signing the petition vas, cc the time of signing, an "owner of real property within S00 fa c of the property where the mobile home is ptopoead co be located on. /�ff f Signature of C1. cuts( • Printed Nano S� t� �� iCRIRED AND RN_to before w thin 4 day o/ b.l{Almr+A-1244._..... 19 WITNESS my hand and official seal. . Ny commission expires: .wt FIRST SECURITY BANK 605 Ith Sheet , .iat Lupton. COW,""' ".2: 1446" 9:3128 F 4S(*,MEMORR nDU 1119€. Tu COLORADO Weld County Planning Oat. September 13, 1993 From Jeffrey L. Stoll, Supervisor, Environmental Health Subb.ctCase Number: ZPMH-1874 Name: PfSjitsz, &intent A. Environmental Protection Services has reviewed this proposal: the following conditions are recommended to be part of any approval: 1. The I.S.D.S. is sized for a three (3) bedroom mobile home, if a larger mobile home is requested an I.S.D.S. evaluation on all existing septic systems will be necessary prior to issuing the required septic permit. 2. An Individual Sewage Disposal System permit must be finalized and approved by an Environmental Protection Specialist within one (1) year of the application date. JLS/jg-1797 gallr SEP 141993 A w od trinity PIsnaI City of fort 'Lupton P.O. BOX 148 130 S. McXINLEY AVENUE FT. LUPTON. CO 80621 September 15, 1993 Board of County Commissioners weld County, Colorado 915 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Weld CounhlunSi • RE: Referral #'s - ZPMS - 1873 - 1874 - 1875 - 1876 Commissioners: COUNTY OF WELD (303) 857-6884 `i J .'•1 At our regular Planning Commission meeting of September 1472,14.9)3,.;c) the above listed Weld County Referrals were reviewed. We•wauId "? like to take this opportunity to express our concerns inaeverl areas and request some information related to the Aristocrat .D�I Ranchettes. co It is the understanding of this Planning Commission that the area was originally approved for the construction of single family residences on one acre sites. Allowances were made to allow temporary use of mobile home structures during the construction period of the residences. Is our understanding correct? If so, have amendments to the original covenants been approved allowing permanent use of mobile homes as principal dwellings? In order to assist this Planning Commission in better understanding the process, we would request a copy of the original covenants (approved with the subdivision) along with any amendments or other changes that have been approved. Because of the fact that the subdivision is now bordering the City Limits of Fort Lupton, we are concerned with future uses. Water supply is another issue of concern. Can the current system support the growth of the subdivision? Many of the one acre sites have more than one mobile home unit, which could increase the water demand. Are separate septic systems being constructed for each new dwelling (mobile or other)? What assurances are included within the covenants for cleaning septic systems? In the County's opinion, is there a need for concern related to septic systems overflowing and leaking into underground water supplies? 931272: As you can see, the City of Fort Lupton has many questions related to the Aristocrat Acres Subdivision. We are certain that the County shares our concerns and will provide the City of Fort Lupton with copies of related documentation. At this time, the City of Fort Lupton does not support approval of permits related to additional mobile home sites in the Aristocrat Acres Subdivision. With the location of the subdivision being so near our current city limits, proper operation of the subdivision is of increasing concern to the City of Fort Lupton. We wish to express our sincere appreciation for the' support provided by Weld County over the past several years. The working relationship between Weld County and the City of Fort Lupton has improved to a point of mutual respect and support. Your response to our concerns has been extremely supportive. We again wish to thank you for your assistance, and we look forward to a positive working relationship in the future. Lyle Morton Fort Lupton Planning Commission 931272 • 111111t. COLORADO September 1, 1993 . ) TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:' DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303)353-3845, EXT. 3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES , 1400 N. 17TH AVENUE GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 CASE NUMBER: ZPMH-1874 • Enclosed is an application from Vicente C, Martinez for a Zoning permit for a mobile home to be used as a principal dwelling. The parcel of land is described as Lot 2. Block 24. Aristocrat Ranchettes, Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is southeast of Weld County Road 18 and Weld County Road 31. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments • or recommendation you consider relevant.to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and, will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by September 15, 1993 so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Crag Thompson, Current Planner, if you have anyquestions about the, application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does noc) comply with our 'Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: 3. We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: Please_]cefer to the enclosed letter. Signed: Agency: Date: . 9312TH NAME: Vicente C. Martinez REFERRALS SENT: September 1, 1993 COUNTY Attorney ,,,-Health Department Extension Service ^_Emergency Management Office Sheriff's Office Engineering Housing Authority Airport Authority Building Inspection REFERRAL LIST CASE NUMBER: 2PMH-1874 REFERRALS TO BE RECEIVED BY: September 15, 1993 STATE _Division of Water Resources Geological Survey Department of Health Department of Transportation - 'Historical Society - Water Conservation Board - -Oil and Gas Conservation Commission FIRE DISTRICTS Ault F-1 Berthoud F-2 Briggsdale F-24 `Brighton 1-3 ^Eaton F-4 Fort Lupton F-5 _Caleton F-6 _Hudson F-7 Johnstown F-8 La Salle 1-9 _Mountain View F-10 Milliken F-11 Nunn F-12 Pawnee 1-22 �-Platteville F-13 Platte Valley F-14 �Poudre Valley F-15 _Rayner F-2 Southeast Weld 1-16 Windsor/Severance F-17 Wiggins 1-18 Western Hills F-20 OTHER Central Colo. Water Conservancy Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. �Tri-Area Planning Commission TOWNS and CITIES _Ault Brighton Broomfield Dacono _Eaton Erie Evans Firestone _Z Fort Lupton Frederick Carden City Gilcrest --------Greeley Grover Hudson Johnstown Keenesburg Kersey —La Salle Lochbuie _Longmont Mead Milliken New Rayner __Northglenn Nunn Pierce rPlatteville Severance Thornton ----Windsor COUNTIES Adams _Boulder Lorimer FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES US Army Corps of Engineers USDA -APHIS Veterinary Service _Federal Aviation Administration Federal Communication Commission $$)IT. CONSERVATION DISTRICTS Dist. Brighton TFort Collins _Greeley Longmont West Adams Cnwyr55ION/BQARD MEMBER far,. Ci COLORADO September 1, 1993 Vicente G. Martinez 15236 Colorado Highway 52 Fort Lupton, CO 80621 Subject: ZPHH-1874 Dear Mr. Martinez: DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303) 35,-3345, EXT. 3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 1400 N. 17TH AVENUE GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 Your mobile home zoning permit application is complete and in order and will be processed by our office on or before October 1, 1993. If it is determined that the application meets the approval criteria of Section 43 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance and you have submitted a petition with the signatures of at least 70X of the surrounding property owners who have no objection to your request, you will be notified that the zoning permit is approved. If the staff determines that the application does not meet the approval criteria, you will be notified and asked to appear before the Board of County Commissioners at a public hearing. You will be informed of the hearing date at least a week prior to the hearing. The Board of County Commissioners will then consider your application and make a final decision on the zoning permit for the mobile home. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to call me. Respectfully, Greg Thompson Current Planner GT/bjs 4. 931272 • • flk COLORADO DATE: October 21, 1993 TO: SURROUNDING PROPERTY/MINERAL OWNERS CASE NUMBER: ZPMH-1874 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303) 35345, EXT. 3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 1400 N. 17TH AVENUE GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 There will be a Public Hearing before the Weld County Board of County Commissioners on Wednesday, November 24, 1993, at 9:00 a.m., in the County Commissioners' Hearing Room, First Floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado concerning the request of: NAME: Vincente G. Martinez FOR: A Zoning Permit for a Mobile Home to be used as a Principal Dwelling. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 2, Block 24, Aristocrat Ranchettes, Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: The southeast corner of Weld County Road 18 and Weld County Road 31. Your property is within five -hundred (500) feet of the property on which this request has been made or you may have an interest in the minerals located under the property under consideration. For additional information write or telephone Monica Daniels -Mika, Current Planner. Comments or objections related to the above request should be submitted in writing to the Weld County Department of Planning Services, 1400 N. 17th Avenue, Greeley, Colorado 80631, on or before the date of public hearing. 931272 CERTIFICATE OF r _A I L I N G I hereby certify that I have placed a true and correct copy of the surrounding propertyowners and owners and lessees of minerals in,, "i�=".�Je"irQ.�.'0-iits'C"y.M.fii•�.85,e •.:.`` q'90 virti'Z ? oza"A' er1�a ti ez n.,the Mited,v'a "s` States Mail, postage prepaid First Class Mail by letter as addressed on the attached list. this (. day of October, 1993. SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS AND/OR SURFACE ESTATE/INTEREST. OWNERS Vincent° Martinez 2PMH-1873, 1874, and 1875 "Ek'g rem,E ✓-rviih 'kmegeo,v- .i.: " Ft. Lupton, CO 80621 Jerry and Donna Adams 15979 Nancy Avenue Ft. Lupton, CO 80621 Laurence and Mary Ann Cross c/o Michael and Francine Jenkins 654 S. Denver Avenue Ft. Lupton, CO 80621 Nancy Jane Seymour 430 Madison Street Denver, CO 80206 Nancy Jane Seymour 433 Park Point Drive #2008 Golden, CO 80401 Orville and Lou Tinnin 907 Pacific Place ...- Ft:._, Lu • ton;::. CO,. „80621..-:c. Maria Adelida Alderote 621 Cody Street Lakewood, CO 80215 Manuel and Nellie Rubi 15850 Dale Avenue Ft. Lupton, CO 80621 Custom Flatteners P.O. Box 26 Dacono, CO 80514 Ronnie and Paula Morganflash 15819 Lamb Avenue Ft. Lupton, CO 80621 • Tena Kay Floryancic 15857 Caroline Avenue Ft. Lupton, CO 80621 Vincente Martinez 15236 Highway 52 --“--ttt' "Ft. Lupton ..CO .:`8062.1 ,_ Annie F. Perez 6354 Pierson Street Arvada, CO 80004 Arnold and Kimberly Miller 7573 Woodruff Ft. Lupton, CO 80621 James and Dorothy Wicklow c/o Gary Colley 15976 Caroline. Avenue Ft. Lupton, CO 80621 John and Alberta Mansfield c/o Hurshell Malone 7575 Patrick Street Ft. Lupton, CO 80621 Vera Jane and Carl Rodman P.O. Box 558 Platteville, CO 80651 1023 Higgins Ft. Lupton, CO 80621 Robert and Joyce Mills 7486 Patrick Street Ft. Lupton, CO 80621 Daniel Martinez 15126 Highway 52 Ft. Lupton, CO 80621 • -_ 931272 SIMLA Loo NAMES OF OWNERS OF PROPERTY WITHIN 500 FEET Please print or type NAME ADDRESS, TOWN/CITY, STATE AND ZIP CODE ASSESSOR'S PARCEL a IDENTIFICATION 0 DONALD & CATHERINE FORT LUPTONK CO. 130927116005 JERRY & DONNA 15979 NANCY AVE. ADAMS FORT LUPTON, CO. 130927109003 LAURENCE & MARY. ANN 654 S. DENVER AVE. CROSS FORT LUTON, CO. NANCY JANE 430.MADr oN ST. SEYMOUR DENVER, CO. 80206 NANCX JANE 433 PARK POINT DR.ff2UU8 SEYMOUR GOLDEN, CO. 80401 0l{VILLE & LUJ E. 91J1-YAULl'IG lire TINNIN FORT LUPTON, CO. MARIA ADELIDA 621 CUDY ST. LAKEWOOD.,CO. 80215 130927110006 ALDERETE _ MANIIEL & NELLIE 15850 DAZE AVE. FORT LUPTON, CO. 130927110007 CUSTOM FLA'TTENEHS P.U.BUX. 26 DACONO. CO. 80514 130927110004 RONNIE & PAULA 15819 LAMB AVE. MORGANFLASH TENA KAY FLORYANCIC 1 309271 09002 130927109001' 0 130927109004 S'U 130927110005 RUBI FORT LUPTON, CO. 15857 CAROLINE AVE. FORT LUPTON, CO. A . FORT LUPTON, CO. 15236 HIWAY 52 FORT LUPTON, CO. 6354 PIERSON sT. ARVADA, CO. 80004 130927118007 6354 PIERSON ST. ARVADA, CO. 80004 130927118006 FLORYANCIC viCENTE G. MARTINEZ ANNIE F. PEREZ ANNIE F. PEREZ ARNOLD & KIMBERLY 7573 WOODRUFF MILLER FORT LUPTON, CO. ARNOLD & KIMBERLY 7573 WOODRUFF MILLER FORT LUPTON, CO. JANE & DOROTHY 15976 CAROLINE AVE. WICKLOW FORT LUPTON CO. 130927117006 JOHN & ALBERTA 7575 PATRICK ST. MANSFIELD FORT LUPTON, CO. 130927117003 JOHN & ALBERTA 7575 1SATnCi-s'i'. MANSFIELD FORT LUPTON, CO. 130927117004 VERA JANE & CARL P.O.BOX S5c RODMAN PLATTEVILLE, CO. ZELLA D. 16023 HiGGiNS WHITT FORT LUPTON, CO. 130926303001 Lk.LLA D. 16023 HIGGINS WHITT FORT LUPTON, CO. 130926303002 k0t3ER'T & JUYUE 748b FATRICK ST. MILLS FORT LUPTON CO. DANIEL MARTINEZ 130927115006 130927115007 130927115004 130927115005 130927118004 130927118005 130926000001 130926304001 13n926304002 0 O 6 0 V O V C 0 00 0 v w w C 9:12'72 Mobile Home Petition Do not sign this petition unless you are an "owner" of reel property within 5C0 feat of the property on which the mobile home is proposed to be located on. An owner is a person holding fee title to reel property. You era au "owner" if you hold a contract to purchase real property which obligates you to pay general taxes on that property. In that instance, the seller may not sign this petition. Ws. the undersigned owners of property within 500 feat of the property that the mobile home is proposed to be located on, do not object to the issuance of a zoning permit for a mobile home to be used as a Do not sign Mr. and Mrs. — sign individually. Do not sign this unless you have read all of the text. r�•'%- (x �g1UESCRIRED A ' SWORN to before me this 19 ►'; "s ••• ‘01, , •• 'w s WITNESS my hand end official seal. to :o> 4, Ny commission expires: 0r G0, 0. Signature STATE or COLORADO ) ) se. COUNTY OP WELD ) Mailing Address Telephone Date of Number Signing AFFIDAVIT OF CIRCULATOR I, being first duly sworn, depose and say that my address is chat Z. have circulated the within Petition, that each signature thereon vss affixed in my presence, and that each signature thereon is a signature of the person chat is purports to be and that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, each person signing the petition wes, at the time of signing, an "owner" of real property within 500 fe t of the property where the mobile home is proposed to be located on. v. t N/ti (r, /✓fr�ftl, Nn tor Printed Saco Noce cUST 931272 TNSPECTIQy REPORT NAME: Vincente Martinez CASE NUMBER; ZPMH-1874 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: Lot 2, Block 24, Aristocrat Ranchettes, Weld County, Colorado. DATE: September 22, 1993 One mobile home is located on the property without proper zoning permits. The property slopes from the east down to th.3 west. Access to the property is off of Woodruff Street. Kei -Sehuett urrent Planner 9u12'72 AR237JV26 RESOLUTION RE: DENY MOBILE HOME PERMIT NO. 1875 - MARTINEZ WHEREAS. the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County. Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board of Comity Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, on the 24th day of November, 1993, considered the request of Vincente G. Martinez for a mobile home to be used as a principal dwelling, and WHEREAS, said mobile home is to be occupied in an A (Agricultural) Zone District on a parcel of land being more particularly described as follows: Lot 1, Block 24, Aristocrat Ranchettes, Weld County, Colorado .WHEREAS, at the meeting on November 24, 1993, said matter was continued to December 13, 1993, to allow staff time to verify whether or not water is available to said property, and WHEREAS, at the meeting on December 13, 1993, the Board of County Commissioners, having heard the testimony, finds that said request should be denied subject to the following reasons: 1. The owner did not submit sufficient evidence to prove that water may be supplied to the lot in such a manner as to be adequate in quality, quantity and dependability for the proposed use. 2. The Fort Lupton Planning Commission does not support approval of said request. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld Countye Colorado, that the request of Vincente G. Martinez for permission to place a mobile home to be used as a principal dwelling on the above described parcel of land, which was found to be in compliance with Section 43 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, be. and hereby is, denied subject to the hereinabove listed reasons. B 1424 REC 02371426 01/28/94 16:08 $0.00 1/002 F 1543 MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK & RECORDER WELD CO, CO 931271 cc: Pt; N[; MARnivCZ. • ZPMH #1875 - MARTINEZ PAGE 2 The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 13th day of December, A.D., 1993. ATTEST: Weld County Clerk to the Board Deputy ,},et • 't l APPROVED AS T,0 FORM , BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD, COUNTY, COLORADO Constance L. Herber Chairman E i Yri B 1424 REC 02371426 01/28/94 16:08 $0.00 2/002 F 1544 MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK & RECORDER WELD CO, CO 931271 RESOLUTION RE: ACTION OF BOARD CONCERNING MOBILE HOME PERMIT 111875 - MARTINEZ WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County. Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County. Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, on the 24th day of November. 1993, considered the request of Vincente G. Martinez for a mobile home to be used as a principal dwelling, and WHEREAS, said mobile home is to be occupied in an A (Agricultural) Zone District on a parcel of land being more particularly described as follows: Lot 1, Block 24, Aristocrat Ranchettes, Weld County, Colorado WHEREAS, at said hearing on November 24, 1993, the Board, after hearing all of the testimony and statements of those present,'deemed it advisable to continue said matter to December13,-,1993,.at--9:00 a.m..--to allow staff time to verify whether or not"water is available to.said'property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that this matter be, and hereby is, Continued to December 13, 1993, at 9:00 a.m. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 24th day of November, A.D., 1993. ATTEST1! // /✓ J// LL 7777w�tOJr� ((//((//� Weld County Clerk to the Board BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ; COUNTY, COLORADO gigeed4 �% Constance /L. rbbee{t.' airman BY: /�i t ,c247, -e-,47‹ \ /1A (/�jiAh7 Deputy Clerk to the Bt sd 1 W. H. Webst r, Pro-Tem llL.. CountyAil / Attorne EXCUSED George E. Baxte a e C. Ha • EXCUSED Barbara J. Kirkmeyer et: PL; /#t; /MPG 931219 sawn To: Board of County Commissioners ZPMH-1875 Applicant: Vincente C. Martinez This request is for 1 mobile home to be used as a principal dwelling Legal Description of Parcel: Lot 1, Block 4, Aristocrat Ranchettes, Weld County, Color d2 Date: October 20, 1993 Location: Southeast of Weld County Road 18 and Weld County Road 31. this recomm recommends that the request be approved for the has request and following re sons: WILL WILL NOT Be compatible with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. Be compatible with the surrounding area. Be in harmony with the character of the neighborhood. _X-- Adversely affect the immediate area. Be adequately served by water and sewage disposal facilities. Adversely affect the general health, safety, and welfare of the inhabitants of the area and the County. COMMENTS: Staff has received several phone calls from surrounding property owners in objection to this request. The Department of Planning Services' staff recommendation for approval is conditional upon the following: 1. The applicant applying for a building permit for the mobile. home prior to locating the mobile home on the property. 2. Prior to the occupancy of the mobilehome, connected toan approved septic system and legal 3 The mobleehwith ile home shall not be 1 and 2 abntil such time that the applicant hap Monica Daniels -Mika, Current Pla er mobile home shall be water supply. 991271 921219 931271 �"" /aJ/ WELL COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES 1400 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 Phone 353-3845, Ext. 3540 IMPORTANT — Complete all items on both sides. Mark boxes where applicable. APPLICANT VICENTE G. MARTINEZ ADDRESS OWNER ZONING PERMIT MOBILE HOME PHONE (303) 857-2091 7705 PATRICK STREET FORT LUPTON, COLORADO 80621 ADDRESS VICENTE G. MARTINEZ 15236 COLORADO HIWAY 52 CITY - STATE 7,21P Ft: LUPTON, C_0; ' 80621 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1/2 OF 1/2 N.W.1/4 S.W. 1/4 Section 3- , T.1 N, R 66' W. Total Acreage_ONE PHONE (303) 8572091 Application for zoning permit is made for: Staff Approval Temporary Use During Construction of a residence ❑ Temporary Storage The above requires an Application fee of $165.00 Board of County Commissioners Approval O Use Beyond 18 months During Construction of a residence Extension Beyond 6 months for Temporary Storage' More than one HH as Accessory to Farm More than one MR as Accessory Use as an Office ❑ More, than one MH as Accessory Use in C'or I Zone'District ❑ Temporary' ., Use, during Medical Hardship ❑ More than one accessory structure O Principal Dwelling O O 1 44 ISARISTOCRAT RANCHETTF.S The above requires an Application fee of $190.00 TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL ❑ Public or private company: Septic Tank — Permit # 920295 Copy Attached: Yes ® No ❑ ' DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES USE ONLY ZONING DISTRICT (ZONING PERMIT NUMBER APPLICATION FEE PAID 19()22 RECEIPT NUMBER( / q47 I (DATE �J f20(Q3 CHAINDEXED APPROVED BY:"��`"��Y} TYPE OF WATER SUPPLY ® Public or private company: A.R.W.P. INC. O Individual Eve_IX, cistern) Well Permit # Copy Attached: Yes 0, No ISSUED BY: O Staff O Board of County Commissioners Hearing Date AMP DATE MOBILE HOME BUILDING PERMIT NUMBER DATE ISSUED 931271 A sketch plan is required as part of the application review. Please attach a sketch plan of the site at the scale on one inch represents fifty feet or other suitable scale to show the proposed location of the mobile, home,' including distances from the property lines and other structures on the property; access to the mobile home, indicating whether the access is existing or proposed; location and measurements of any easements or right-of-ways; and any existing structures on the property. Sketch Plan attached: Yes in No Q Deed or'contract attached: Yes Ea No What housing is available on the property and what is its present use? NONE How many mobile,homes are on this property at the present time? NONE TEMPORARY USE DURING CONSTRUCTION OF A RESIDENCE Building Permit 'Number Date Building Permit Issued Zoning Permit valid for 6 months from date of issue. Zoning Permit issued Valid from to RENEWALS: , FIRST - From SECOND -From to to Fee: Reviewed & Approved _ Fee:Reviewed 4 Approved _ ACCESSORY FARM USE 'Type of farming operation on property: Number of Livestock 'Average number per year Acres Irrigated Acres Dryland Acres Pasture Number of employees now employed: Full time: Part time: ACCESSORY USE IN C OR I ZONE DISTRICT Type of commercial or industrial activity on property: Number of employees: Full time: Mobile home will be used for: Part time: ICNATURE OF APPLICANT, )� _ 74.#1, APPLICATION DATE AUGUST 24, 1993 BUILDING PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL MOBILE HOMES IN ADDITION TO THE ZONING PERMIT FOR MOBILE HOMES. THE BUILDING PERMIT MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE BUILDING INSPECTION DIVISION, WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES, 1400 N. 17TH AVENUE, GREELEY, COLORADO 80631, PHONE 353.3845, EXT. 3540, AFTER APPROVAL OF THE ZONING PERMIT. 9312? DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 1400 NORTH 17TH AVENUE GREELEY, COLORADO 80621 AUGUST 24, 1993 RE: ZONING PERMIT (FOR A MOBILE HOME) I VICENTE G. MARTINEZ ON THIS DATE AUGUST 24, 1993 REQUESTING A PRINCIPAL DWELLING PERMIT FOR A MOBILE HOME FOR THE PREMISES WHICH ARE KNOWN AS 7705 PATRICK STREET IN THE SUB -DIVISION ARISTOCRAT RANCHETTES BEING ALSO KNOWN AS LOT NUMBERED 1 IN BLOCK NUMBERED__24, IN FORT LUPTON, FOR THE PURPOSES OF IMPROVING THE LAND AND__A POSSIBLE SALE. VICENTE G. RTINEZ 15236 COLORADO HIWA 52 FORT LUPTON, COLORADO 80621 (303) 857-2091 931271 3 C )' 23 S /3LaX11s i 2 0.1 I.. SEP'T'IC: PERMIT IbIG)UIfC/UP'DF1TE ' HSPINI:K)1 PERFECT INFO: PERMIT W 920295 OP F' (F /G) G PERMIT TYPE N PERMIT STATUS A OWNER MARTIh1EZ, VICEN1E O. ISS DATE A02692 SYSTEM TYPE T OWNER ADDR: STREET 15236 HWY 52 PHONE 303 8572091 CITY FT' LUPTON* STATE CO ZIP 00621 0000 SITE 'ADDR: STREET 770:5 PATRICK ST CITY FT LUPT'ON STATE CO ZIP 80621. 0000 LEGAL DE SC: P'T'1 SW4 PT2 SEC (' uil^4AL• 02 RHO 66 SU33DIV. ARIST'OCRATRANCHET'1'ES _OT 00 BLK 024 FILING 000 nr_ 1.15E TYPE: hES Y COI.1 N IhIS'f N OTHER _u ` 1L5 u CERVICES: PERS 004 BATH 1.00 LOT SIZE 1.00 BEDROOMS 03 13SNT/PLMB N WATER SUPPLY APtIST BP# SIGNED DATE 102692 FEE PAID V AMT.PAII) 1050.00 OWNEI </SIGN.I3Y VICENTE G. MARTINEZ INSTALLATION SPECS: PER[ DATE PER[ RATE (MIN/IN) 0_O WATER DEPTH FT. GRD.SLOPE 00 DIRECTION SOIL(S/U) I_NGR.DSGN.REG. TANK CAP TRENCH SO.FT ' BED SO.FT ADDL.TERMS 1O0YFP EVALUATOR EVAL.DATE INSTALLER FINAL EVALR. FINAL DATE BOH(A/D) BOH DATE RECVD BY 0030 ENGINEER '.JPDATE PERMIT - PF1 RETLJRP‘ TO •BROWSE - PF4 II PRINT PERMIT - PF2 ' RETURN TO BROWSE MENU - PFS RETURN TO MENU - PF8 RETURN TO MAIN'MENU - PF12 9312'71 M Date Val 7/ 3 ARISTOCRAT RANCHETTES WATER PROJECT Inc. 15841 Dale Ave. Ft. Lupton, Colorado 80621 Creecings; This is to confirm that there is'a working water tap on BLOCK o“.1 LOT If you have any questions, please call the bookkeeper at 857-4210. Thank you, OPEIOU #5 SJT 7-87 931271 AR2300383•'. ` 8 1348 RECT.02300383.-08/13/917,12' $5.00- 1/001 'F. 0019 MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN, CLERK & RECORDER. WELD CO CO • WARRANTY DEED • THIS DEED, Made this 14TH day of AUGUST, 1992 between " MABEL S. WALK�R• /� A of the County of t .f f rr.i4U'Qand State of 1 OVA /f 143,, grantor, and VICENTE C. MARTINI& !I whose legal address is 15236 HIGHWAY 52, FT. LUPTON, COLORADO . 80621 • of tho County of WELD and State of COLORADO, grantee: r, STATE DOCUMENTARY FEE Date t_:,r_ 9Y. SO La WITNESSETII, That the grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of SIX THOUSAND AND 00/100ths DOLLARS, ($6,000.00), the receipt and sufficiency of which Is hereby acknowledged, his granted, bargained, sold and conveyed, and by these presents does Fent, bargain, sell, convey and confirm unto the grantee, his heirs and assigns forever, all the real property together with improvements, if any, situate, lying and being in the County of WELD, and State of Colorado, described as follows: LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK 24, ARISTOCRAT RANCIIETTES, COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO. aisorknown by street and number as VACANT LAND, FT. LUPTON, COLORADO 80621 TOGETHER with all and singular the hereditament. and appurtenances thereunto belonging, orb anywise ■ppcstalning and the reversion and reversions, remainder and remainders, rents, issues and profits thereof, and all the estate, right, title, interest, claim and demand whatsoever of the grantor, either in law or equity, of, In and to the above bargained premises, with the hereditament. and appurtenances, TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises above bargained and described, with the appurtenances, unto the grantee, his heirs and assigns forever. And the grantor, for himself, his heir and personal representative., does covenant, grant, bargain and agree to and with the grantee, his heirs and assigns, that at the time of the caseating and delivery of these presents, he it well seized of the premises above conveyed, has good, sure, perfect, absolute and indefeasible estate of inheritance, in law, in feo simple, and has good right, full power and lawful authority to grant, bargain, sell and convey the same in manner and form aforesaid, and that the same are free and clear from all former and other grants, bargains, sales, liens, taxes, assessments, encumbrances and restrictions of whatever kind or nature soever, except for taxes for the current year, a Gen but not yet .due or payable, easements, restrictions, reservations, covenants and rights -of -way of record, If any, : ^ _ ._� _ , ._ _•1: ------ fr The The grantor shall and will WARRANT AND FOREVER DEFEND the above -bargained premise. In the quid and peaceable pomesaion of rho grantee, his heirs and assign■, against all and every person or persons lawfully.olaiming the whole or any part thereof. The singular number shall include the plural, the plural the singular, and the use of any gender shall be applicable to all genders. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the grantor has executed this deed on the dare act forth above. . • • VZ I STATE OP Son c •. COUNTY olz*L.-AftASAHOE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 14TH day of AUGUST, 1992 b My Commission expire: 8/21/93 I.: Witness my No. !MA. Rn. 741. WARRANTY DFFD (for Yaer.ar.rbte *wont) MABEL S W official JACKI HARTMAN Nosy Alai I' 91271 NAMES OF OWNERS OF PROPERTY WITHIN 500 FEET Please print or type NAME ADDRESS, TOWN/CITY, STATE AND ZIP CODE ASSESSOR'S PARCEL IDENTIFICATION S DONALD & CATHERINE JERft�( & DONNA AALDDAUMREENCE & MARY ANN NJCRRNOSyS SEYMOURANE NANCY JANE. . SEYMOUR ORVILLE & LOU E. TINNIN MARIA ADELIDA ALDERETE MANUEL & NELLIE RUB' CUSTOM FLATTENERS RONNIE & PAULA MORGANFLASH FLORYANCIC TENA KAY FLORYANCIC MARTINCZG. ANNIE F. PEREZ ARNOLD & KIMBERLY MILLER ARNOLD & KIMBERLY ULLER WICKLOW DOROTHY JOHN & ALBERTA MANSFIELD MANSFII&ELDBERTA E$R VZRELLApJANE & CARL WHITT D. WHITT D. ROBERT & JOYCE DANIEL '11RT-INEZ 7665 PATRICK ST. FORT LUPTON. CO. F64TSLUPTON RC4VE. 443g0 MADISON S DENVER, CO. 8 206 GOLDEN, CO. POINT 907 PACIFIC PL FORT LUPTONT CO. 621 CODY ST. LAKEWOOD, CO. 80215 FOR OLUPTONAV0. P.O.BOX 26 DACONO. CO. 80514 15819 LAMB AVE. FORT LUPTON, CO. 15857 CAROLINE AVE. FORT LUPTON, CO. 15857 CAROLINE AVE. FORT LUPTON,, CO. 15236 HIWAY 52 FORT LUPTON, CO 63 PIERSON ST ARVADA, CO. 80004 6354 BIERSON ST. ARVADA. CO. 80004 7573 WOODRUFF FORT LUPTON, CO. 7573 WOODRUFF FORT_LUPTON. CO. 15976 CAROLINE AVE. FORT LUPTON, CO. 7575 PATRICK ST. FORT LUPTON, CO. P.O.BOX 558 PLATTEVILLE, CO. 16023 HIGGINS FORT LUPTON, CO. ,8R 31B98i.-vsco. ;ORc Ef06 t 80: 15126 HWY 52 FORT LUPTON G0. 130927116005 130927109003 130927109002 130927109001 130927109004 130927110005 130927110006 130927110007 130927110004 130927115006 130927115007 130927115004 130927115005 130927118007 130927118006 130927118004 130927118005 130927117006 130927117003 130927117004 130926000001 130926303001 J ✓ 130926303002 ✓,! 130926304001 ✓ +/e 1,09263n4nO2 Wick 9 it Moblie•How Petition Do not sign this petition unless you are an "owner" of real property within 500 feet of the property on which the mobile how is proposed co be lowed on, An mover is a person holding fee title to reel property. You are an 'owner" if you hold a contract to purchase real property which obligate, you to pay general texas on Chat property. In that Instance. the seller may not sign this petition. We. the undersigned owners of property vichin 500 fast of the property chat the mobile hose Is proposed to be located on. do not object to the issuance of • zoning permit for a mobile home co be used as a Do not sign Mr. and Mrs. - sign individually. Do not sign this unless you have read all of the [ext. Signature STATE or COLORADO ) ) se. COUNTY OF WELD Mailing Address Telephone Date of Number Signing 7ers— Pgrz,cX s's7-zest Wzs/Se3 t,&,/S g,irrL__-aesi 7,43 I z t�So _Doke.% tC7(z(-r r.5/ 7o7S S'S7— /f/ r g/ v 93 467 Par.); r PI YS725/9>d /cy- Wn4 o?. fsn2ss-f friv rg�3sro�� po ,zss ysry ,A1,0s✓ fvvo� n asZ' s 3 v az foe 7094 -93✓ ..itJA.3r.- tfrivr .?$9.2/30 19-9?✓ ss9• J`/Wit- iec v en-24se-27-63✓ AFFIDAVIT OF CIRCULATOR I, be (trait dui �.svora. depose and say Char my address is 7 7d r a 1 iL L n it . 1 , chat I. have circulated the within Tat cion. char each signature thereon was affixed in my presence, and char each signature thereon is • signature of the person chat is purports Co be and chat, to the best of my knowledge and belief, each parson signing the petition vas, at chs time of signing, an "owner" of real property vichia 500 feet of the property where the mobile home is proposed co be located on. J / ✓Ccwlr 4,l/A/Ltifti Printed Name gpeture of Circuit ��j� yp� USSCRIgED AND'-Sv'ORN co before w [hie �/ - day of 19fl. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Ny commission erpires:y/ Notary b 7 1, 199" RST SECURITY DAMN 605 Ith Sheet fort Lupton. Cuotedo go62. 931271 Mobile Now Petition Do not sign Chia petition unless you are an "owner" of real property within SCO feet of•che property on which the mobile home is proposed to be located on. An owner Is a person holding fee title to real property. You are en "owner" if you hold a contract to purchase real property which obligates you to pay general taxes on that property. In that inacaate, the seller may not sign this petition. We. the undersigned owners of property withio 500 feet of the property that the mobile home is proposed to be located on, donot object to the Issuance of a zoning permit for a mobile home tobe used as a Do not sign Mr. and Mrs. — sign individually. Do mot sign this unless you have read all of the text. Signature o/lar,...4 ey j STATE OP COLORADO ) se. AFFIDAVIT OF CIRCULATOR count OF WU.D ) Mailing Address ?u. 13oyf e Telephone Date Number Sign 8 s9-ascl f¢1�Sd9 c- 1-93, yy�g f)ao Ca ,Po k(7-9046 4&463 ✓ WSJ f.,17-9-7 v/ $$5194// P-”-13 of g m ✓ .01 I. being first duly sworn, depose and say chat my address is that I. have circulated the within Petition, that each signature thereon was affixed in my presence. and that each signature thereon is a signature of the parson that is purports Co be and that. co the best of my knowledge and belief. each person signing the petition was, acthe time of signing, an "owner" of real property within 500 feet of the property where the mobile hone is proposed to be located on. Signature of Circulator Printed Saw SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this day of 19 . VITNBSS my hand and official seal. My cormiasion expires: Notary Public 931271 AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS SURFACE ESTATE Application No. Subject Property STATE OF COLORADO ) COUNTY OF WELD ) so. THE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn, states that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names, addresses and the corresponding Parcel Identification Number assigned by the Weld County Assessor of the owners of property (the surface estate) within five hundred (500) feet of the property subject to the application. 'This list was compiled.from the records of the Weld County Assessor, or an ownership update from a title or abstract company or attorney, derived from such records, or from the, records of the. Weld County Clerk and Recorder. The list compiled from the records of the, Weld County Assessor shall have been assembled within thirty (30) days of the application submission date. The forgoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to b= ore me this day of {�I WITNESS my hand and official seal. 1,1995 My Commission expires: 12/7,01...21 Notary u j c FIRS ECURIIY BANK 605 tit Street Fat Lupton. CSaado 8062s 93271 COLORADO subpelCase Number: ZPMH-1875 Name: �(, p�q�/ Mogyn ente C. mEmoRAnDum To Weld County Planning D't' September 13, 1993 From Jeffrey L. Stoll, Supervisor, Environmental Health { w' i Environmental Protection Services has reviewed this proposal; the following conditions are recommended to be part of any approval: 1. An Individual Sewage Disposal System permit must be finalized and approved by an Environmental Protection Specialist within one (1) year of the application date. JLS/jg-1799 •v-�11NJ 931271. fair City of fort Upton P.O. BOX 148 130 S. MCKtNLEY AVENUE FT LUPTON. Co 80821 September 15, 1993 Hoard of County Commissioners Weld County, Colorado 915 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 RE: Referral #'s - ZPMH - 1873 - 1874 - 1875 - 1876 Commissioners: COUNTY OF WELD (303) 857-6894 —1 } y `t Cy J _t N At our regular Planning Commission meeting of September 1;-_'199'3,.';7 the above listed Weld County Referrals were reviewed. we G%butd =? like to take this opportunity to express our concerns in everjl areas and request some information related to the Aristocrat Ranchettes. ca It is the understanding of this Planning Commission that the area was originally approved for the construction of single family residences on one acre sites. Allowances were made to allow temporary use of mobile home structures during the construction period of the residences. Is our understanding correct? If so, have amendments to the original covenants been approved allowing permanent use of mobile homes as principal dwellings? In order to assist this Planning Commission in better understanding the process, we would request a copy of the original covenants (approved with the subdivision) along with any amendments or other changes that have been approved. Because of the fact that the subdivision is now bordering the City Limits of Fort Lupton, we are concerned with future uses. Water supply is another issue of concern. Can the current system support the growth of the subdivision? Many of the one acre sites have more than one mobile home unit, which could increase the water demand. Are separate septic systems being constructed for each new dwelling (mobile or other)? What assurances are included within the covenants for cleaning septic systems? In the County's opinion, is there a need for concern related to septic systems overflowing and leaking into underground water supplies? 931271 As you can see, the City of Port Lupton has many questions related to the Aristocrat Acres Subdivision. We are certain that the County shares our concerns and will provide the City of Fort Lupton with copies of related documentation. At this time, the City of Fort Lupton does not support approval of permits related to additional mobile home sites in the Aristocrat Acres Subdivision. With the location of the subdivision being so near our current city limits, proper operation of the subdivision is of increasing concern to the City of Fort Lupton. We wish to express our sincere appreciation for thd support provided by Weld County over the past several years. The working relationship between Weld County and the City of Fort Lupton has improved to a point of mutual respect and support. Your response to our concerns has been extremely supportive. We again wish to thank you for your assistance, and we look forward to a positive working relationship in the future. Sincerel %ii Lyle Morton Fort Lupton Planning Commission 931271 WIDc. COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303) 353.3845, EXT. 3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 1400 N. 17TH AVENUE • GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 September 1, 1993 CASE NUMBER: 2PMH-1875 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from Vicente C. Martinez for a Zoning permit for a,•.. mobile home to be used as a principal dwelling. The parcel of land is described as Lot 1, Block 24, Aristocrat Ranchettea, Weld County, Colorado. The location' of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is southeast: of Weld County Road 18 and Weld County Road 31. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by September 15, 1993 so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Greg Thompson, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with' our Comprehensive Plan for the . following reasons. 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: - 3. We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Signed: 42 j�l''(p'rLO+v Agency: Date: 9-%d -93 931271 NAME: Vicente C. Martinez REFERRALS SENT: September 1, 1993 COUNTY Attorney _Health Department Extension Service +Emergency Management Office Sheriff's Office _Engineering _Housing Authority Airport Authority _Building Inspection REFERRAL LIST CASE NUMBER: ZPMH-1875 REFERRALS TO BE RECEIVED BY: September 15, 1993 $TATR _Division of Water Resources Geological Survey _Department of Health Department of Transportation _Historical Society _Water Conservation Board Oil and Gas Conservation Commission FIRE QISTRICTS Ault F-1 ' _Berthoud F-2 Briggsdale F-24 Brighton F-3 Eaton F-4 _Fort Lupton F -S Caleton F-6 Hudson F-7 _Johnstown F-8 La Salle F-9 Mountain View F-10 ,Milliken F-11 Nunn F-12 _Pawnee F-22 Platteville F-13 Platte Valley F-14 ^Poudre Valley 1-15 ^Raymer F-2 _Southeast Weld F-16 _Windsor/Severance F-17 Wiggins F-18 _Western Hills 1-20 OTHER Central Colo. Water Conservancy Dist. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. __Tri-Area Planning Commission TOWNS and CITIES Ault. Brighton Broomfield ^Dec ono Eaton Erie Evans Firestone _Z,_ Fort Lupton Frederick Carden City r_ Gilcrest _Greeley _Grover Hudson Johnstown Keenesburg _Kersey _La Salle �Lochbuie Longmont Mead Milliken New Raymer ^Northglenn Nunn Pierce Platteville _Severance Thornton Windsor COUNTIES _Adams Boulder Larimer FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES _US Army Corps of Engineers USDA -APHIS Veterinary Service _Federal Aviation Administration ^Federal Communication Commission $OIL CONSERVATION DISTRICTS Brighton Fort Collins Greeley _Longmont West Adams cOMHISSION/BOARD MEMBER 931271 sta; Mae COLORADO September 1. 1993 Vicente G. Martinez 15236 Colorado Highway 52 Fort Lupton, CO 80621 Subject: 'ZPMH-1875 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303) 353.3845, EXT. 3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 1400 N. 17TH AVENUE GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 Dear Mr. Martinez: Your mobile home zoning permit application is complete and in order and will be processed by our office on or before October 1, 1993. If it is determined that the application meets the -approval criteria of Section 43 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance and you have submitted a petition with the signatures of at least 70% of the surrounding property owners who have no objection to your request, you will be notified that the zoning permit is approved. If the staff determines that the application does not meet the approval criteria, you will be notified and asked to appear before the Board of County Commissioners at a public hearing. You will be informed of the hearing date at least a week prior to the hearing. The Board of County Commissioners will then consider your application and make a final decision on the zoning permit for the mobile home. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to call me. Respectfully. Greg Thompson Current Planner CT%bjs. 9312'71 Ott W1YYc COLORADO DATE: October 21, 1993 TO: SURROUNDING PROPERTY/MINERAL OWNERS CASE NUMBER: ZPNH-1875 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303) 3533845, EXT. 3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 1400 N. 17TH AVENUE GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 There will be a Public Hearing before the Weld County Board of County Commissioners on Wednesday, November 24, 1993, at 9:00 a.m., in the County Commissioners' Hearing Room, First Floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado concerning the request of: NAME: Vincente G. Martinez FOR: A Zoning Permit for a Mobile Home to be used as a Principal Dwelling. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 1, Block 24, Aristocrat Ranchettes, Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: The southeast corner of Weld County Road 18 and Weld County Road 31. Your property is within five -hundred (500) feet of the property on which this request has Seen made or you may have an interest in the minerals located under the property under consideration. For additional information write or telephone Monica Daniels -Mika, Current Planner. Comments or objections related to the above request should be submitted in writing to the Weld County Department of Planning Services, 1400 N. 17th Avenue, Greeley, Colorado 80631, on or before the date of public'hearing. 93127 . CEITIFICATEOFMAILINQ I hereby certify that I have placed a true and correct copy of the surrounding property owners and owners and lessees of minerals in accordance with the notification requirements of Weld County in Case Numbers ZPMH-1873, 1874, and 1875 for Vincente Martinez in the United States Mail, postage prepaid First Class Mail by letter as addressed on the attached list. this d((Q day of October, 1993. 931271 SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS AND/OR SURFACE ESTATE/INTEREST OWNERS Vincente Martinez ZPMH-1873, 1874, and 1875 Donald and Catherine Clamp 7665 Patrick Street Ft. Lupton, CO 80621 Jerry and Donna Adams 15979 Nancy Avenue Ft. Lupton, CO 80621 Laurence and Mary Ann Cross c/o Michael and Francine Jenkins 654 S. Denver Avenue Ft. Lupton, CO 80621 Nancy Jane Seymour 430 Madison Street Denver, CO 80206 Nancy Jane Seymour 433 Park Point Drive #2008 Golden, CO 80401 Orville and Lou Tinnin 907 Pacific Place Ft. Lupton, CO 80621 Maria Adelida Alderete 621 Cody Street Lakewood, CO 80215 Manuel and Nellie Rubi 15850 Dale Avenue Ft. Lupton, CO 80621 Custom Flatteners P.O. Box 26 Dacono, CO 80514 Ronnie and Paula Morganflash 15819 Lamb Avenue Ft. Lupton, CO 80621 9312'71 Tena Kay Floryancic 15857 Caroline Avenue Ft. Lupton, CO 80621 Vincente Martinez 15236 Highway 52 Ft. Lupton, CO 80621 Annie F. Perez 6354 Pierson Street Arvada, CO 80004 Arnold and Kimberly Miller 7573 Woodruff Ft. Lupton, CO 80621 James and Dorothy Wicklow c/o Gary Colley 15976 Caroline Avenue Ft. Lupton, CO 80621 John and Alberta Mansfield c/o Hurshell Malone 7575 Patrick Street Ft. Lupton, CO 80621 ?11e - Vera Jane and Carl Rodman P.O. Box 558 Platteville, CO 80651 10en;)D. Whitt 16023 Higgins Ft. Lupton, CO 80621 Robert and Joyce Mills 7486 Patrick Street Ft. Lupton, CO 80621 Daniel Martinez 15126 Highway 52 Ft. Lupton, CO 80621 931271 c Cto copy of the orignal document. NAME Lo-{- NAMES OF OWNERS OF PROPERTY WITHIN 500 FEET Please print or type ADDRESS, TOWN/CITY, ASSESSOR'S PARCEL STATE AND ZIP CODE IDENTIFICATION # DNALD & CATHERINE 7665 PATRICK ST. !Q ;,AMP FORT LUPTON. CO. I;JSRRY & DONNA 15979 NANCY AVE A)AMS FORT LUPTON. CO. I LF(URENCE & MARY ANN 654 S. DENVER AVE. 'IC 0-S,V FORT LUPTON, CO. - NrnJANE 430 MADISON ST. &,‘" MOFUR DENVER, CO. 80206 130927109001 ;.ANCY: JANE 433 PARK POINT DR.#200I 3EYM(1JR GOLDEN, CO. 80401 130927109004 -c^* ZttE & LOU E. 907 PACIFIC Pt. 'T.I1`itTIN FORT LUPTON, CO. 130927110005 ' A i t9r ADELIDA 621 CODY ST. ERETE LAKEWOOD, CO. 80215 130927110006 V,,4,L & NELLIE 15850 DALE AVE. % tit FORT LUPTON, CO. 130927110007 CUSTOM FLA'1"1ENERS P.O.BOX 26 130927116005 130927109003 130927109002 DOCO. VE514 130927110004 'RONNIE & PAULA 15819 LAMBAVE.MORGANFLASH FORT LUPTON, CO. 130927115006 TENA KAY 15857 L`AROLINE AVE. FLORYANCIC FORT LUPTON, CO. 130927115007 TENA KAY 15837 CARULINE AVE. FLORYANCIC VICEN'TE G. MARTINEZ MARTINEZ FORT LUPTON, CO. 130927115004 1.52,56 H1WAY 52 FORT LUPTON, CO. 130927115005 ANNIE F. n354 PIERSON ST. PEREZ ANNIE F. PEREZ ARVADA, CO. 80004 130927118007 6354 PIERSON ST. ARVADA, CO. 80004 130927118006 ARNOLD & KIMBERLY 75'/3 WUUDRUFF MILLER FORT LUPTON, CO. 130927118004 ARNOLD & KIMBERLY 7573 WOODRUFF MILLER FORT LUPTON, CO. 130927118005 JAMES & DOROTHY 15976 CAROLINE AVE. WICKLOW FORT LUPTON, CO. 130927117006 'JOHN & ALBERTA "/7S FATHILK Si:. MANSFIELD FORT LUPTON, CO. 130927117003 JOHN & ALBERTA 7575 PATRICK ST. 'ANSFIELD FORT LUPTON, CO. 130927117004 VERA JANE & CARL P.O.BOX 558 RODMAN PLATTEVILLE, CO. 130926000001 ZELLA D. WHITT FORT 16023.HIGGINS LUPTON, CO.130926303001 = ZELLA D. 16023 HIGGINS • tWHITT FORT LUPTON, CO. 130926303002 ROBERT & MILLS DANIEL MARTIN JOYCE 7486 PATRICK ST. FORT LUPTON, CO. 130926304001 15126 HIWA2 FORT LUPTON CO, 1309?h304nns 93127'1 if ry Mobile None Petition Do not sign this petition unless you are an "owner" of real property within SCO feet of the property on which the mobile home is proposed to be located on. An owner la a person holding fee title to real property. You are an "owner" if you hold a contract co purchase real property which obligates you to pay general taxes on chat property. In that instants, the seller may not sign this petition. We, the undersigned owners of property within 500 feet of the property that the mobile home Is proposed to be located on, do not object to the issuance of a zoning permit for a mobile home to be used as a Do not sign Mr. and Mrs. — sign individually. Do not sign this unless you have read all of the text. Signature STATE OF COLORADO ) ) se. COUNTY or WELD ) Mailing Address Telephone Dace of Number Signing AFFIDAVIT OF CIRCULATOR I, being first duly sworn, depose and say chat vy address is that I. have circulated the within Petition, that each signature thereon was affixed in my presence, and that each signature thereon is a signature of the person that is purports co be and that, Co the best of my knowledge and belief, each person signing the petition wee, at the time of signing, an "owner" of real property within 500 feet of the property where the mobile home is proposed to be located on. .f ,i, Signature of ircu for Printed N �� // Nil" me • Aft l„ BSLRIEED ND SWORN co before we this (/l d(ay of I•4./li)VlC • we e,'_ ' e YITNESS my hand and official sea V' t. • 0 It j•, .•' e.1. ary F .bl tt Q*'�Gse O my commission expires: �u.-w �',m n� ,1' t/), 9 (�A�1N11\Vld . 931271 INSPECIIDN DEPORT NAME: Vincente Martinez CASE NUMBER: ZPMi-1875 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: Lot 1, Block 24, Aristocrat Ranchettes, Weld County. Colorado. DATE: September 22, 1993 The property is vacant at this time. The access is from Patrick to the north. The property is covered with weeks. The property slopes from the east down to the west. . iechettC;Hirr Current Planner 931271, Donald & Cathy Clamp 7665 Patrick St. Ft. Lupton, CO 80621 (303)857-2051 Board of County Commissioners Weld County Greeley, Colorado Honorable Commissioners: We are writing this letter to voice our concerns with the development of properties owned by Vincent Martinez, specifically three lots (1,2 & 3) on block 24 of the Aristocrat Ranchettes Subdivision. Mr. Martinez owns other properties within Aristocrat. We obtained a partial list from the Weld Co. Assessor's Office and are submitting some photographs to demonstrate these properties do not meet Weld County's minimum standards. These standards were mentioned in a letter to all property owners in Aristocrat Ranchettes dated 11/30/92. The letter stated that all property owners were required to be in compliance by 1/1/93. Specifically mentioned were noncommercial junk yards, derelict vehicles and fire hazards such as uncut weeds and dry grass. Photo Page "A" This is a view of our property from the corner of Patrick and Caroline. We have strived to care for our property and to exceed Weld County minimum standards. Maintaining and improving our property has raised its value over the last four years. It is unfair to allow an adjacent landowner to lower our property value due to disrepair and neglect of adjoining property. Photo Page "B" A view from our property to the West showing 15977 Caroline (lot 4, block 24). The top photo was taken over a year ago, about the time Mr. Martinez purchased the property. We were repairing the roof of the common wall garage at the time. The lower photo represents 15977 Caroline as it appears currently. The lower photo and all other photos submitted were taken in October of 1993, the weekend before this hearing was previously scheduled. The weeds have not been cut by Mr. Martinez or his tenants since he purchased the property over a year ago. Photo Page "C" Looking North from Caroline is a view of two of the lots that Mr. Martinez wants to develop. (Lots 2 & 3, block 24) The weeds have not been cut during the time that Mr. Martinez has owned the property and trash has been allowed to accumulate. Mr. Martinez has owned this property for over a year. 931271 Photo Page "D" Two views of the property owned by Mr. Martinez at the corner of Woodruff and Caroline (lot 8, block 23) located one block West of our property. Although some of the weeds have been taken care of, these photos speak for themselves. Derelict vehicles on this property have appeared since Mr. Martinez purchased it over two years ago. Photo Page "E" The top photo is a view South from 18 Rd. of lot 1, block 6; owned by Mr Martinez. The weeds are uncut and a automotive battery is "recycled" near the road. The lower photo is a view South from Lamb Ave. of lot 2, block 60; owned by Mr. Martinez. This debris has been allowed to gather during the time Mr. Martinez has owned the property. We have no problem with Vincent Martinez developing his land responsibly. However, with viewing some of his properties we see little evidence that he has developed other land holdings in Aristocrat Ranchettes responsibly. Developing land to the extent of placing a mobile home and putting in water and septic without care and upkeep of the surrounding acreage cannot be construed to be responsible. If vacant land is more attractive than poorly developed land, there is no benefit to the community or the county. As Weld County has a duty to protect the rights of all property owners, continued violation of Weld County minimum standards causes the County to use precious resources ($$$) that could be used in other areas to benefit more Weld County citizens. We request that this hearing of these zoning requests of Vincent Martinez (lots 1,2 & 3, block 24) be tabled, continued or postponed until Mr. Martinez can demonstrate good faith by bringing his other properties in the Aristocrat Ranchettes up to Weld County minimum standards. If the Board is unable to continue these hearings, we would request that a performance bond be posted by Mr. Martinez in the amount of $50,000 or $5000 per adjacent property owner within 500 feet (whichever is greater) to guarantee that all of his properties within Aristocrat will meet Weld County minimum standards by 1/1/94, a year after the original compliance date. Please inform us of any further hearings or proceedings of this matter at the following address: Donald & Cathy Clamp c/o Lichtenfels, Pansing & Miller, P.C. 885 S. Colorado Blvd. Denver, CO 80222-8006 Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, 7 � ( � y/y3 Qe.\Ci\ 931271 Lot: 4 7/' 0 y Block: l`tt Property Address: 1445 ionic 'Lc fl0•AWECS : OouAs. t cnw Cum. Lot: E 7 1 ' of C( Block 2`f Property Address: 1645 Parwrct A Oawac : O0,JA6* 4 CAM CeAstp 931271 Q Lot: • . 4 Block: 7-y Property Address: 1 S1'17 Cartsmai of s.io* : V isfl to MM1tnngts Lot 4 Block D B Property Address: I S17'? CO Rua& OWNSK : VI u1Ct'r MMT"JML 93=71 Lot 2 1 3 Block: Di Property Address: 1 S %In Cantu mit Ow' aft : Ut lCtwr otmsnaft Lot 3 Block 1.4 Property Address: 1 S L'i1 Coatatan. ow a a: k) la (tor r sitrie it 9312'71 Lot: t Block: 23 Property Address: i SSt'? CNanssao cousin : v uat osr M A*t'W& D Lot t Block 21 Property Address: et, Cigna taw. OWES: ti (Aar *tsstj fi Lot: ! Block G Property Address: 11164 ROILS it Ow.tet; %J uJcg.4 ` eatMe ' f . Lot I Block G0 Property Address: 7255 PAIlutIc OWNd.: V ►WIC6Nr AAA *van-. 9312'71 Tip e p� c�O Jg // _l any. ..�o _ Life_ . A t 04 .0... p.,ti �Letteoho _ _._i_ .. e cti ._..�a�-_�__..✓mo�-__..,�tiy.o._ _..arc. -1 Si 2 Lt - _,42.4,:kried_n„y“1/4(93kin :tea_,_' •Gti+�,.�• _,,I-; y _._ - _-- • 'jar: �'�- � •r.1r. •f..r�Tr.� r1�+�_�r�-_ .. .rr I�r s_ 4 ••__ • •s -_M_ - - - -- .rri_.� .•r.++�.wy....' .r �.raA�.... �.JaS�!r~ • ice. • �` • •- 4. . \ 1 • �, � • - ♦ • • • • .,• : 'f.• . -`♦ .�, • k:-. • V • _ter • ., a r..�.•�..+•r _'._1r '.w�..• ��. Ir-'_ • \1 � • .5 ^• • ;r• _••�� • 1. • \ a • N ^, ' 1r. _ •'•••••• r\. ✓ w.. _ •NIL mule t• w•\ • • 5�.1S':�.. •4• L' ••• -, - rvur, mac-, ,, t 1.52_5-3 L&otin <e- 257.- I y7 N a a e h RESOLUTION RE: GRANT MOBILE HOME PERMIT NO. 1881 - CAMPBELL WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County. Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, on the 13th day of December, 1993. considered the request of Kenneth W. Campbell for a mobile home to be used as a principal dwelling, and WHEREAS, said mobile home is to be occupied in an A (Agricultural) Zone District on a parcel of land being more particularly described as follows: Part of the NW} of Section 16, Township 11 North, Range 58 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners, having heard the testimony, finds that said request should be granted subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall apply for a building permit for the mobile home prior to locating the mobile home on the property. 2. Prior to the occupancy of the mobile home, the mobile home shall be connected to an approved septic system and a legal water supply. 3. The mobile home shall not be occupied until such time that the applicant has complied with the above mentioned conditions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the request of Kenneth W. Campbell for permission to place a mobile home to be used as a principal dwelling on the above described parcel of land, which was found to be in compliance with Section 43 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, be, and hereby is, granted subject to the hereinabove listed conditions. 931274 ptossct CC: AG; entmo it ZPMH #1881 - CAMPBELL PAGE 2 The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 13th day of December, A.D., 1993. ATTES Weld County Clerk to the Board BY: APPROVED AS TO FORM; County Atto ey BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WETJ1) COUNTY, COLORADO Cons -nce . rbert, Chairman ISAMS- Barbara J. Kirkme er 931274 To: Board of County Commissioners Date: December 13, 1993 zPMH-1881 Applicant: Kenneth W. Campbell This request is for one mobile home to be used as a principal dwelling. Legal Description of Parcel: Part of the NW4 of Section 16, T11N, R58W of the 6th P.M., Weld County. Location: Northeast of the intersection of Weld County Road 125 and Weld County Road 128. The Department of recommends that the Planning Services staff has reviewed this request and request be approved for the following reasons: WILL WILL NOT Be compatible with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. Be compatible with the surrounding area. Be in harmony with the character of the neighborhood. X. Adversely affect the immediate area. COMMENTS: Be adequately served by water and sewage disposal facilities. Adversely affect the general health, safety, and welfare of the inhabitants of tho area and the County. This mobile home will be located at the Vim Grader shed for the grader operator to live in. The Department of Planning Services' staff recommendation for approval is conditional upon the following: 1. The applicant applying for a building permit for the mobile home prior to locating the mobile home on the property. 2. Prior to the occupancy of the mobile home, the mobile home shall be connected to an approved septic system and a legal water supply. 3. The mobile home shall not be occupied until such time that the applicant has comp7,,ied with Conditions 1 and 2 above. December 13. 1993 Greg ompson,ICurrent Planner Date 431274 y M M 4 • t o O O P O P w 2 n . • .i , • ;cc/ / / I •) • o . x ti 1. • • r • . • .. I I _ �,i r .. �. t w�• ?,I,; ; V • `�\•r \• I• r . / l • �, 1 � — • • r I a • .a 1 J • • l : I 11 1 " i I 12 . ! • t+ yl > < r 4 1 i • .• • Ir t. I I•,�• o :et •j � • ce• • • • • • ,• . L t • 1 �� • •I ..Oa • 0�-• - • a • / r I .Q I -,' • . ,, - �� •�'� •� • •••. •ill r 4`j .j 4. WELD.COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES 1400 N. 17eh Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 Phone 353-3845, Ext. 3540 IMPORTANT - Complete all items on both sides. Mark boxes where applicable. APPLICANT NNETR,W. CAMPBELL PHONE ZONING PERMIT MOBILE HOME ADDRESS 62308 WCR 130, New Raymer, Colorado - OWNER State of Colorado/Weld County PRONE (303) 356-4000 EXT 3750 ADDRESS P.O.Box 758 CITY — 5141E - ZIPCO 80632 ?LOCK 'SUBDIVISION LEGAL DESCRIPTION Part of the SW 1/4 Section 16 , T 11 N, R 58 W. Total Acreage 2.07 Application for zoning permit is made .for: Staff Approval Temporary Use During Construction of a residence Board of County Commissioners Approval 0 Use Beyond 18 months During Construction ..___of a_residence Q Extension Beyond 6 months for Temporary Storage O More than one MH as Accessoryto Farm El More than one MR as Accessory Use as... -an Office More that 'one MH aa_Accessory Use in C"or'I Zone' District"- -•_ Temporary IIse ag duriMedical Hardship - More than one accessory structure Principal Dwelling • Temporary Storage The above requires an Application fee of The above requires an Applicationfee of $165.00 _-S190.00 TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL Q Public or private company: TYPE OF WATER SUPPLY, • Public or private company © Septic Tank - Permit /PC -930356 ® Individual (well, cistern) Well Permit #133357 Copy Attached: Yes '� • CNo Copy Attached: Yea V No Q ZONING DISTRICT ZONING PERMIT NUMBER APPLICATION FEE PAID RECEIPT NUMBER [DATE 'J CBAINDEXED APPROVED BY: County Commissioners Hearing Date ■ Staff Board of ISSUED BY: DATE MOBILE HOME BUILDING PERMIT NUMBER DATE ISSUED rl -].e Oben A sketch plan is required as part of the application review. Please attach a sketch plan of the site at the scale on one inch represent! fifty feet or other suitable scale to shoe the proposed location of the mobile, home, including distances from the property lines and other structures on the property; access to the mobile home, indicating whether the accesgc is existing or proposed; location and measurements of any easements or right=of—ways; anic any existing structures on the property. Sketch Plan attached: Yese0 op Deed or contract attached: Yea ® Not: What housing is available on the property and what is its present use? There is none. How many.mobile homes, are on this prape,rtyat the present tine? 0 TEMPORARY USE DURING CONSTRUCTION OF A RESIDENCE Building Permit Number Date Building Permit Issued Zoning Permit valid for 6 months from date o£ issue. Zoning Permit issued Valid from to RENEWALS: FIRST- From to Fee: Reviewed & Approved SECOND - From to Fee: Reviewed S Approved ACCESSORY FARM USE Type of farming operation on property: Number of Livestock `Average number per year Acres Irrigated Acres Dryland Acres Pasture Number of employees now employed: Full time: Part time: ACCESSORY USE IN C OR I ZONE DISTRICT Type of commercial or industrial activity on property: Number of employees: Mobile home will be used for: tIGNA 19#131 PLICATION:DATE . .n..-� y -3u 4 9 BUILDING PERMITS ARE REQUIRED_FOR HOMES IN.ADDITION TO THE ZONING. PERMIT FOR MOBILE HOMES. THE BUILDING PERMIT MAYBE OBTAINED FROM THE BUILDING INSPECTION DIVISION, WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES, 1400 N. 17TH AVENUE, GREELEY, COLORADO80631; PHONE '353-3845,-EXT._3540, AFTER'APPROVAZ,OPINE ZONING PERMIT. k• WEI,h COUNfl EPARTMENT OF PLANNING'SERvICES 1400 N. 17th Avenue': Greeley, Colorado. 80631 Phone:353-3845, Ext. 3540 IMPORTANT —_Complete all items on both -sides. Mark boxes where applicable. APPLICANT ,KENNETH W CAMPBELL,' PHONE -1,,r ZONING PERMIT MOBILE HOME ,, „62308.,WCR 130, New,Rayner,; Colorado State of Colorado/Weld County ADDRESS P.O. Box 758 PRONE (303);356-4000 EXT 3750 CITY - STGreeley, CO 80632 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Part of the ,W 1/4 Section 16 LOT 'BLOCK UBDIVISION • Application for zoning perit is made for: Staff Approval © Temporary Use During Construction` of'aresidence • .:...r Q Temporary Storage N, R 58 W. Total Acreage 2x.07 an Office • - ~ `❑.,More_than..`one. MH_as_Accessory. Use .ins `• •-•'''- "" - -C'"Oel'Zone'Distrsct`= ' «i P, C Temporary. Use, during. Medical Hardship ` • More than one accessory structure ,_;_ Principal Dwelling The above requires an Application fee of.. 5165,00--._..._ .._ Board of County Commissioners Approval .D Uae Beyond 18 months During Construction of,a.residence - o Extension Beyond 6 months for Temporary •.Storage . More than one NH as'Accessory. to.: Farm More than one MH as Accessory Use asc• `, The above requires an Application fee of; $190.00 _ TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL Q�Public or _prtvate_,company�µ Q Septic Tank- Permit 4 Copy Attached: Yes O yNo TYPE -OF WATER SUPPLY " ❑"Public'or.privats-company: ® Individual (well, cistern), —Well-Permit- # "13335'7 DEPARTMENT..OF_PLANNING..SERVICES IISE ONLY M Copy Attached:, Yes Q No O - ZONING DISTRICT• •-. ZONING PERMIT NUMBER APPLICATION FEE PAID RECEIPT NUMBER DATE CHAINDD APPROVED.tBY ,..."'::' w'-',:.`" C, f....:.. :. J , :it. •' - . v, •.. ... , it; "r•Hearing Date... •... . ;_ f•,n Staff -- Ill ;Board;.of•;County,Commiraionera . ISSUED .By s .... .., •-•,,,----..... RATE MOBILE HOME BUILDING PERMIT NUMBER DATE ISSUED :?4 • • A sketch plan is required as part of the application review.. Please attach a sketch,, plan:•, of .the site at the scale on one inch represents fifty_,feet•or other suitable -scale to show the proposed location of the mobile home, including distances ' from the property lines and: other structures on the r er p op ty; access to•the;mobxle home, indicating whether the access is existing or proposed; location and measurements of any P P easements or right - any existing structures on the property. Sketch Plan attached: Yes Deed or, contract attached_ Yes : No i What housing is available on the property and what is its present use? There "is none...; Row:;many mobile homesare.;on.;this property,. at therypresent„time2__ TENPORARYtSE DURING CONSTRUCTION OF' A' RESIDENCE 'i<q.; =:L�c ' Building Permit Number Date Building Permit Issued _Zoning Permit valid.for,6 months. from date of issue. Zoning Permit issued from to 'FIRST]: from" ' ''to " ""' 'Fee: Reviewed & Approved SECOND, —From; -....4 to .i "'Fee: Reviewed & Approved ACCESSORY FARM USE .>a.4 t , ^'J•• Type'of'farmineoperatlon `on\propertyc': Number "of;Livestock' 'Average number per year Acres Irrigated "'"' Acres Dryland Acres Pasture _ 'Number of employees now employed: " Full'time:' Part time.(' ACCESSORY USE ,IN COR I:ZONE/DISTRICT ' Type of commercial,oriindustria1activity:on property: - Number of employees:.' Full time:------ -Paittime Mobile home will -be used -:for_-•• PLICATION_.DATE` . BUILDING PERMITS ,ARE -REQUIRED...FOR :ALL ,,MOBILE....HOME.S...,INADDITION TO ZONING PERMIT FOR MOBILE HOMES. THE BUILDING PltMIT MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE BUILDING '- INSPECTION; DIVISION .WELD'COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE"OFFICES•;"1400 N::17T1LAVENUE, GREELEY,-COLORADO -80631;"`PHONE'353='3'845, EXT73540;'AFTER APPROVArOrTRE-ZONING._;= PERMIT. • \ 'C' r.2. 931274 COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF ROAD AND BRIDGE PHONE (303) 356.4000 P.O. BOX 758 GREELEY,COLORADO 80632 September 30, 1993 Department of Planning Services Weld County Administrative Offices 1400 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: A mobile home will be placed on the maintenance pad at the Vim grader shed site. The grader operator that was recently hired for the area plans to move a 24' X 60' mobile home on to the site. The mobile home will be used by Kenneth W. Campbell as a principal dwelling. Sine Geo g ooder Director CG/zw:vim 931274 APPLICATION FOR INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM NO. G-930356:' WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT NEW APPLICATION ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES :1.5:1.'7 16TH AVENUE: COURT. GREELEY. CO 80o31. 353-0635 EXT. .225 CJWNIZR WELD COUNTY ADDRESS 915 19TH ST PH (303) tiE_40G0 GREELEY CO 90631 ADDRESS OF PROPOSED SYSTEM ";?;;;0:3 WCR :1.30 NEW RAYNIEct CO 90742 LEGAL DEc CRTFTIt_1N OF Si-i r::C NW4 SEC .. ❑. 11 RNO 5,43 SUBDIVISION: LOT 0 BLOCK 0 FILING 0 USE. TYPE: RESIDENTIAL MOBILE HOME SERVICES: PERSONS 1. BATHROOMS 1.50 LOT SIZE BEDROOMS 3 BASEMENT Y PWCLL f1:;L.MC:i:h1'r PLUMBING NO WATER SUPPLY r'Wr'l..l._ APPLICANT ACKNOWLEDGES THAT THE COMPLETENESS OF THIS APPLICATION IS CONDITIONAL UPON FURTHER MANDATORY AND ADDITIONAL TESTS AND REPORTS AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT TO BE, MADE AND FURNISHED BY THE APPLICANT OR BY THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT FOR: PURPOSES OF THE EVALUATION OF THE APPLICATION: AND THE ISSUANCE OF THE PERMIT IS SUBJECT TO SUCH TERMS AND CONDITIONS AS DEEMED NECESSARY TO INSURE:: COMPLIANCE WITH RULES AND REGULATIONS ADOPTED UNDER ARTICLE 10. TITLE 25,. CRS .i.' 9'73. AS AMENDED. THE APPLICANT CERTIFIES THAT THE PROPOSED SYSTEM WILL NOT BE LOCATED WITHIN 400 FEET OF A COMMUNITY SEWAGE SYSTEM. THE UNDERSIGNED S:TGGNED HEREBY CERT/FIES THAT ALL. STATEMENTS MADE. INFORMATION AND REPORTS SUBMITTED HEREWITH AND REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT ARE, OR WILL BE. REPRESENTED '10 BE TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE: BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. AND ARE DESIGNED TO BI:- RELIED ON BY THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT IN EVALUATING THE SAME:: FOR PURPOSES OF ISSUING THE PERMIT AT -'PLIED FOR HEREIN. I FURTHER UNDER— STAND THAT ANY FALSIFICATION :I:CA(T':I:ON OR MISREPRESENTATION MAY RESULT IN THE: DENIAL or THE APPLICATION OR REVOCATION OF ANY PERMIT GRANTED BASED UPON SAID APPLICATION AND IN LEGAL ACTION FOR PERJURY AS PROVIDED •BY LAW. APPLICATION FEE 5150.00 I''CCKL: F•"ANSBERGER/WC B & to f:L: C'I) BY CINDY SALAZAR DATE: 09/30/9:3 OWNER ........_.---._.... _ _._..._ ._..09/30/93 `i:CC:tl4r-1'j1.JItiE: -.DATE' ORIGINAL —APPLICANT: COPY--WCHD WCHD-EHS MAY. 19£34 9312'74 H. P106P. INDIVIDUAL ':SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT NO, G--930356 • WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT NT ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES S 1:1.7 16TH AVENUE COURT. GREELEY. CO 20631 353-0635 _ EXT.2225 . 22 5 OWNER WELD COUNTY ADDRESS 9:I.5 19TH GREELEY ADDRESS OF PROPOSED SYSTEM 61.302 WCR :I.SC) NEW RAYNER CO S0742 LE'GAI_. DESCRIPTION OF SITE: NW4 ;:}I::.(:i :1.6 TWP :1.:1. I:N(3 "", SUBDIVISION: ..OT O BLOCK USE TYPE: RESIDENTIAL_ MOBILE HOME SERVICES: PERSONS 1 BATHROOMS 1.50 LOT SIZE 2.00 ACRES BEDROOMS 3 BASEMENT PLUMBING NO WATER SUPPLY PWELL APPLICATION FEE $150.00 Rac'D BY CINDY SAL_AZAR DATE 09/30/93 NEW PERMIT ST PH ( 303 ) S56-4000 CO S0631 0 FILING 0 SIGNED BY MIKE HANSEERGER/WC X< g; 6 DATE 09/30/93 PERCOLATION RATE .[R„.57mIN PER INCH LIMITING ZONE 7g FEET SOIL TYPE 5.,4,41104.:1. PERCENT GROUND LOPE o .. DIRECTION = REQUIRES I:RIF.:S ENGINEER DESIGN ........ p :I: hl 40 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN 70h4E FROM THE: AI'PL:CCATION INFORMATION SUPPLIED AND THE ON -SITE SOIL PERCOLATION DATA THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM INSTALLATION SPECIFICATIONS ARE REQUIRED: -S7 SEPTIC TANK (�� c:7AL..I_.ONs. ABSORPTION TRENCH - .2 SO. FT. OR CONDITIONS:: S_-t.nt.' .s6N1�-A-L . ABSORPTION ,6 SQ.._.rT-..__._...._ IN ADDITION, THIS PERMIT II , IS S1..XcIECT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL TERMS ANJO (;a U Sts. , nwa a THIS PERMIT IS GRANTED G'EMPORARxLY T•( . OW CONSTRUCTION TO COMMENCE. THIS PERMIT• • MAY SE REVOKED OR SUSPENDER) BY THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT FOR REASONS SET FORTH IN THE WELD COUNTY INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL. SYSTEM REGULATIONS INCLUDING • FAILURE TO MEET ANY TERM OR CONDITION IMPOSED. THEREON DURING TEMPORARY OR FINAL APPROVAL. THE :LSSUAIci: OF TI -Its PERMIT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ASSUMPTION BY THE DEPARTMENT OR ITS EMPLOYEES OF LIABILITY FOE: THE FAILURE OR INADEQUACY Or- THE SEWAGE .DISPOSAL SYSTEM. EhIVIRONMEh AL SPECIALIST DATE THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE AND SHALL BECOME VOID IF SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION HAS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN ONE YEAR OF ITS ISSUANCE:. BEFORE ISSUING FINAL APPROVAL OF THIS PERMIT THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO IMPOSE AUDI- T/ONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS REQUIRED TO MEET OUR REGULATIONS ON A CONTINUING BA- SIS. FINAL PERMIT APPROVAL.. IS CONTINGENT UPON THE FINAL INSPECTION OF THE COM- PLETED SYSTEM BY THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT. 9312'74 ORIGINAL-A(-'PIL..:CCAN'r: C(WY•-wCHD WCND-EI-Is MAY. 1984 tv •4 domminloner, r . • ROWENA ROGERS 'W4 H CLAIRE TOMMY NEAL BOARD OF LAND COMMISSIONERS Department of Natural Resources 620 Centennial Building 1313 Sherman St., Denver, Colorado 80203 (303) 866-3454 November 2, 1983 Mr. Chuck Carlson, Chairman Weld County, Board of, County -Commissioners P.O. .Box 758 Greeley, CO 80632-0758 Dear Mr. Carlson: Re: Right -of -Way Application No. 83/420 Maintenance Yard ANTHONY SABATINI c•r••. Administrator , THOMAS E. BRETZ C ., r�,.[ ;�ICUn7A etDirettor B PGOOD 819$3Chiuntant Enclosed you. will find your copy of the approved Well Permit No. 133357 for the grader shed and shop. Please have your driller submit the logs, pump installation report and beneficial use statement to us, we will then forward the forms to the Division of Water Resources. We wish to further advise you that your right-of-way is considered of full force and effect as of September 21, 1983. We will forward your document on our standard county format as soon as we can have it prepared. Very truly yours, STATE BOARD OF LAND COMMISSIONERS William J illip II Engineering-R/W Coordinator ;UK: jail Enclosure 931274 WRJ.S R,v. 76 COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 818 Centennial Bldg., 1313 Sherman St., Denver, Colorado 80203 zw 8-3/720 •._...,r..' NAME'_')' Application- must -. be complete where (X) A PERMIT TO USE GROUND WATER applicable. Type or,-- ( X) A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AWELNOV 119'53 print: in „BLACK: ,- FOR: ( X) A PERMIT TO INSTALL A PUMP INK. No overstrikes or erasures,: unless - - -- (_.. ) REPLACEMENT FOR NO 6TATE Aa+r FM/S- D •t'a:.• EfeC, Mta initialed. ( ) OTHER fl.t. WATER COURT CASE NO. PERMIT APPLICATION FORK- ;- i �g r- rm • (1) APPLICANT • mailing address _;-STATE OF -COLORADO actir.C by ere t':re;Lh the STREET' STATE BOARD OF LAND COMMISSIONERS Koom 63U, 161.) ancr izn Street nenve ,+ -)n clrv... C o _10, 3 "^ (Sum) (Zip) `' TELEPHONE NO, . ` 866-3454 • • (2) LOCATION QF PROPOSED WELL ...County .: . - We ld NF r of the NW Y., Section 16 Twp.1L. N, Rng. SS N__:_ 6th PM •(3) WATER USE AND WELL DATA LTY; • ,,.Proposed maximum pumping rate (gpm) 1S Average annual amount of ground water to be appropriated (acre.feet): 0.33 . Number of acres to be irrigated: 0 Proposed total depth (feet): 1 SS Aquifer ground water is to be obtained from: Owner's well designation GROUND WATER TO BE USED FOR- . ( ) HOUSEHOLD USE ONLY . no irrigation (01 ( 1 00MESTIC (I) ( ) INDUSTRIAL (5) ( 1 LIVESTOCK (2) ( ) IRRIGATION (6) ( X) COMMERCIAL (4) -- exempt ( 1 MUNICIPAL (8) I OTHER (9) DETAIL THE USE ON BACK IN (11) (4) DRILLER Name Street Ctv Tirented driller Telephone N1 - L+r No (777:r FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: DO NOT WRITE IN THIS COLUMN Receipt No Basin _ -17ist. • ' CONDITION BF!'APPRQVAL This well shall be used such a wav 35 to cause no material injury to existing water rights, The issuance of the permit does not assure th-+ applicant that no injury will occur to another vested water right or preclude another owner of a tared water -right from seeking relief in a civil court action. 1)APPROVED PURSUANT TO CRS 1973, 37-92-602 FOF DRINKING AND SANITARY FACILITIES ONLY IN AN INDIVIDUAL COMMERCIAL BUSINESS(GRADER SHED AN( SHOP) -'AND NOT TO BE USED FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE 2)THE AVERAGE ANNUAL AMOUNT OF GROUND -WATER TC BE APPROPRIATED BY THIS WELL SHALL NOT EXCEED 1/3 ACRE-FOOT. 3)APPROVED,AS THE ONLY WELL ON A TRACT. OF, LANE 2.07 ACRES DESCRIBED AS A PORTION OF NE1; WW1/4r SEC. 16; T.11N, R.58W, 6th P.M. 4)THE RETURN FLOW FROM THE USE OF THE WELL MU: BE THRU A WASTE WATER DISPOSAL SYSTEM OF THE No, EVAPRATIVE TYPE WHERE THE WATER IS RETURNED IC THE SAME STREAM SYSTEM IN WHICH THE WELL IS LOCATED. J. 1%;,tf/y2, OWN r ; a 'S COPY APPLICATION APPROVED C PERMIT NUMBER 13335! DATE ISSUED 0CT 2 8 1983 TION DATE �• SS IS �B (S AT EEl�e�F t1 • BY . ✓ I f/! :'�•f.,ra�sry _ LO. /-e6 �/- COUNTraLr Y Y' (6) THE WELL MUST BE LOCATED BELOW by distances from section lines. ' (5),THE, LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED WELL and the area on 'which the water will be used must be indicated on the diagram below. • Use the CENTER SECTION (1 section, WO acres) for the well location. • t -1- — la I MILE, 5290 FEET NORTH SECTION LINE The scale of the diagram is 2 inches -'1 mile -; Each'small square represents 40 acres. - -4- - ..wA.T}SA.Ct:uIVALENTs TABLE' (Rounded figures), • An acre-foot cov(rstrreol land 1 fool Caen "' - ." '"" 1 cubic foot per second Ids) ... 449 gallons per minute (gpm) -. A family of 5 will repuire approximately 1 acre-foot of water per year. 1 acre-foot 43,560 cubic feet ... 325,900 gallons.. 1.00090m Dumped Continuously for one day produces 4.42 acre•leet. • '_90 1790 ft. from north (norm or sovtn) west ft. from _ - post or vast) LOT BLOCK FILING r SUBDIVISION sec, line sec. line •.(7) TRACT ON WHICH WELL WILL BE LOCATED Owner. State Of Co1Ora it No. of acres 2.07 W1B this be the only well on this tract? Yes (8) PROPOSED CASING PROGRAM Plain Casing 4 in from ft. to - 0 ft. in from ft to ft. Perforated casing 4 in. from 20 ft. to a-' ft in from ft. to 7t (9) FOR REPLACEMENT WELLSgivedistance and direction from old well and plans for plugging„ (10) (,AND ON WHICH GROUND WATER WILL BE USED; Owner(s): -'-State of -"-Colorado Legal description- In NENIV-16-11N-5$wV No. of acres' 2.07 (11) DETAILED DESCAON of the use of ground water: Household use and domestic wells must indicate type of disposal ,'. system to beused a � , . .. .. •_- t*'T`inld and -grader shed -water ,-^septic tank and field system. • (12) OTHER WAVER RIGHTS used on this' land, including wells. Give Registration and Water Court Case Numbers. Type or right : - - - •Used for (purpose) Description of land on which used (13)THE APPLICANTS}. STATE(S) THAT THE INFORMATION SET FORTH HEREON IS TRUE TO. THE BEST OF HIS KNOWLEDGE,, J7( SIGNATURE OF APPL'CA5JSI 931274 AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS SURFACE ESTATE Application No. Subject Property Part of the SW 1/4, Section 16, Township 11 North, Range 58 West STATE OF COLORADO ) COUNTY OF WELD ) ss. THE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn, states that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names, addresses and the corresponding Parcel Identification Number assigned by the Weld County Assessor of the owners of property (the surface estate) within five hundred (500) feet of the property subject to the application. This list was compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor, or an ownership update from a title or abstract company or attorney, derived from such records, or from the records of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. The list compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor shall have been assembled within thirty (30) days of the application submission date. The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me this day of 199S WITNESS'my_hand and official seal. My Commission expires: 2/9/94 ?'Ante 7g & Not ty Public 921274 NAMES OF OWNERS OF PROPERTY WITHIN 500 FEET Please print or type NAME ADDRESS, TOWN/CITY, ASSESSOR'S PARCEL STATE AND ZIP CODE IDENTIFICATION # Harold Weisbrook HC 63 - Box 66 021916000001 Bushnell, NE 69128 State of Colorado Board of State Land Commissioners 021916000002 Dept. of Natural Resources 1313 Sherman Street Denver, CO 80203 Quarter Circle Bar V Ranch, Inc. c/o Jerry E. Anderson Bushnell, NE 69128 P.O. Box 65 021909000003 931274 NAME: Kenneth Campbell REFERRALS SENT: October 6, 1993 REFERRAL LIST CASE NUMBER: ZPMH-1881 REFERRALS TO BE RECEIVED BY: October 20, 1993 COUNTY TOWNS and CITIES Attorney Ault X Health Department _Brighton _Extension Service _Broomfield _Emergency Management Office _Dacono Sheriff's Office Eaton _Engineering Erie _Housing Authority _Evans Airport Authority _Firestone _Building Inspection _Fort Lupton Frederick STATE _Garden City X Division of Water Resources _Gilcrest Geological Survey _Greeley _Department of Health _Grover Department of Transportation _Hudson _Historical Society _Johnstown _Water Conservation Board _Keenesburg __-Oil and Gas Conservation Commission _Kersey La Salle FIRE DJ- D:Ts �Lochbuie _Ault F-1 _Longmont _Berthoud F-2 _Mead Briggsdale F-24 _Milliken _Brighton F-3 New Raymer _Eaton F-4 _Northglenn _Fort Lupton F-5 _Nunn �Galeton F-6 _Pierce _Hudson F-7 Platteville _Johnstown F-8 _Severance La Salle F-9 Thornton Mountain View F-10 _Windsor _Milliken F-11 _Nunn F-12 COUNTIES _Pawnee F-22 Adams _Platteville F-13 _Boulder _Platte Valley F-14 _Larimer Poudre Valley F-15 �Raymer F-2 FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES Southeast Weld F-16 _US Army Corps of Engineers 'Windsor/Severance F-17 USDA -APHIS Veterinary Service _Wiggins F-18 Federal Aviation Administration Western Hills F-20 Federal Communication Commission OTHER SOTI. CONSERVATION DISTRICTS _Central Colo. Water Conservancy Dist. Brighton _Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. _Fort Collins ____Tri-Area Planning Commission _Greeley Longmont West Adams COMMIS SION/BOARDJAMIE 931274 t td COLORADO mEmoRAnaum Greg Thompson To Weld County Planning From Date October 16, 1993 Jeff Stoll, Director, Environmental Health SUb$ Case Number: ZPMH-1881 Name: Campbell, Kenneth PT NW4, Section 16, Township 11 North, Range 58 West Environmental Protection Services has reviewed this proposal; the following conditions are recommended to be part of any approval: 1. An Individual Sewage Disposal System must be located at least 100 feet from any well. 2. The Individual Sewage Disposal System permit (G-930356) must be finalized and approved by an Environmental Protection Specialist within one (1) year of the application date. JLS/ZPMH1881.JS 931274 OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER Division of Water Resources Department of Natural Resources 1313 Sherman Street, Room 818 Denver, Colorado 80203 Phone (303) 866-3581 FAX (303) 866.3589 STATE OF COLORADO October 21, 1993 Mr. Greg Thompson Weld County Department of Planning Services 910 10Th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Re: Campbell Zoning Permit, ZPMH-1881 NW1/4 Sec. 16, T11N, RS8W, 6TH PM W. Division 1, W. District 1 Roy Romer Governor Ken Salazar Executive Director Hal D. Simpson Stare Engineer Dear Mr. Thompson: We have reviewed the above referenced application to place a mobile home on a on a maintenance pad at the Vim grader shed site. The water supply is to be from an existing on lot well with Permit Number 133357. This permit allows use for and commercial business and annual diversions are limited to 1/3 acre oot 108,60pusses in one g as the mobile home is part of theet gallons). As long exceeded, we have no objection to the grading and recommend approovaannual diversions is not If you have any questions in this matter, please contact me. Sincerely, J,L} sus„ JS/campbell cc: Alan Berryman, Division Engineer Water Supply Branch John Schurer, P.E. Senior Water Resource Engineer U 0CT 2 6 1993 Wein County Planning 931274 FIELD CHECK FILING NUMBER: ZPMH-1881 DATE OF INSPECTION: November 19, 1993 APPLICANT'S NAME: Kenneth W. Campbell REQUEST: Zoning Permit for a Mobile Home to be used as a principal dwelling. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NW4 of Section 16, T11N, R58W of the 6th P.H., Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: Northeast of the intersection of Weld County Road 125 and Weld County Road 128. LAND USE: N Rural residence, pasture E Pasture, rural residence S Pasture W Pasture ZONING: N A (Agricultural) E A (Agricultural) S A (Agricultural) W A (Agricultural) COMMENTS: Existing access is onto Weld County Road 130, which is gravel. There are two visible homes. The area has a lot of development, considering the surrounding landscape. Greg Th son Current lanner 931274 QERTIFICATE OF MAILING I hereby certify that I have placed a true and correct copy of the surrounding property owners and owners and lessees of minerals in accordance with the notification requirements of Weld County in Case Number ZPMH-1881 for Kenneth W. Campbell in the United States Mail, postage prepaid First Class Mail by letter as addressed on the attached list. this 24th day of November, 1993. 931274 SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS AND/OR SUBSURFACE ESTATE/MINERAL OWNERS Kenneth W. Campbell ZPMH-1881 Harold Weisbrook HC 63 - Box 66 Bushnell, NE 69128 State of Colorado Board of Land Commissioners Department of Natural Resources 1313 Sherman Street Denver, CO 80203 Quarter Circle Bar V Ranch, Inc. c/o Jerry E. Anderson P.O. Box 65 Bushnell, NE 69128 931274 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303) 3533845, SC. 3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 1400 N. 17TH AVENUE GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 • COLORADO DATE: November 24, 1993 TO: SURROUNDING PROPERTY/MINERAL OWNERS CASE NUMBER: ZPMH-1881 There will be a Public Hearing before the Weld County Board of County Commissioners on Monday, December 13, 1993, at 9:00 a.m., in the County Commissioners' Hearing Room, First Floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado concerning the request of: NAME: Kenneth W. Campbell FOR: A Zoning Permit for a Mobile Home as a principal dwelling. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NW4 of Section 16, TUN, R58W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: Northwest of the intersection of Weld County Road 125 and Weld County Road 128. Your property is within five -hundred (500) feet of the property on which this request has been made or you may have an interest in the minerals located under the property under consideration. For additional information write or telephone Greg Thompson, Current Planner. Comments or objections related to the above request should be submitted in writing to the Weld County Department of Planning Services, 1400 N. 17th Avenue, Greeley, Colorado 80631, on or before the date of public hearing. 931274 • THE E D ACENT TO BLE M LICIN INED SIIN THE EVBENTPTHEEPROERTY UNDER/CONSIDERATIONOISANOTADJ CENTITOAA PUBLICLY RIGHT-OF- WAY. MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, THE APPLICANT SHALL POST ONE SIGN IN THE HOST PROMINENT PLACE ON THE PROPERTY AND POST A SECOND SIGN AT THE POINT AT WHICH THE DRIVEWAY (ACCESS DRIVE) INTERSECTS A PUBLICLY MAINTAINED ROAD RICHT-OF-WAY. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SIGN POSTING CPRTTFICATF I HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER THE PENALTIES OF PERJURY THAT THE SIGN PROVIDED BY THE DEPARTMENT or PLANNING SERVICES WAS POSTED ON THE PROPERTY AT LEAST 10 DAYS BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS HEARING FOR CASE # ZPNH-1881 THE SIGN WAS POSTED BY: ^n OF ON POSTING S SIGNATURE OP APPLjANT STATE OF COLORADO ) as. COUNTY OF WELD ) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO ME THIS.DAY OF ! lA�S�iE%IJ[.f�Xit i , 19 %3 . SEAL MY COMMISSION EXPIRES LAST DAY TO POST SIGN IS: �! jo WW NOTIY PUBLIC December 2, , 19 93 . PLEASE RETURN THIS FORM TO THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES' OFFICE ON OR BEFORE THE DATE OF THE HEARING. 931274 ID COLORADO November 24, 1993 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303) 353-3345, EXT. 3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 1400 N.17TH AVENUE GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 Kenneth W. Campbell 62308 Weld County Road 130 New Raymer, CO 80742 Subject: ZPMH-1881 - Request for a Zoning Permit for a Mobile Home to be used as a principal dwelling on a parcel of land described as part of the NW4 of Section 16, Ti1N, R58W of the 6th P.M.. Weld County, Colorado. Dear Mr. Campbell: I have scheduled a meeting with the Board of County Commissioners on Monday December 13, 1993, at 9:00 a.m. to consider your application. This meeting will take place in the County Commissioners' Hearing Room, first floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado. It is recommended that you or a representative be in attendance to answer any questions the Board of County Commissioners might have with respect to your application. It is the responsibility of an applicant to see that a sign is posted on the property under consideration at least 10 days preceding the hearing date. The sign shall be posted adjacent to and visible from a publicly maintained road right-of-way on the site no later than December 2, 1993. In the event the property under consideration is not adjacent to a publicly maintained road right-of-way, the applicant shall post one sign in the most prominent place on the property and post a second sign at the point at which the driveway (access drive) intersects a publicly maintained road right-of-way. Your sign posting certificate must be returned to the Department of Planning Services' office on or before the date of the hearing. The Department of Planning Services' staff will make a recommendation concerning this application to the Board of County Commissioners. It is the responsibility of the applicant to call the Department of Planning Services' office a few days before the date of the Commissioners' hearing to obtain the recommendation. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to call me. Respectfully, For Greg Thompson Current Planner 93122'74 COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303) 'MOW, EXT. 3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 1400 N. 17TH AVENUE GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 October 6, 1993 Kenneth W. Campbell. ,.62308 Weld County Road 130 New Raymer, CO 80742 Subject:' ZPMH-1881 Dear Mr. Campbell: Your mobile home zoning permit application is, complete and in order and will be processed by our office on or before November 6, 1993. If it is determined that the application meets the approval criteria of Section 43 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance and you have submitted a petition with the signatures of at least 70% of the surrounding property owners who have no objection to your request, you will be notified that the zoning permit is approved. If the staff determines that the• application does not meet the approval criteria, you will be notified and asked to, appear before the board of County Commissioners at a public hearing.. You will be informed of the hearing date at least a week prior to the hearing. The Board of County Commissioners will then consider your application and make a final decision on the zoning permit for the mobile home. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to call me. Respectful Greg. Current RESOLUTION RE: AUTHORIZATION FOR THE WELD COUNTY ATTORNEY TO PROCEED WITH LEGAL ACTION AGAINST CERTAIN PARTIES FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE WELD COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado. pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Weld County Department of Planning Services has referred certain violations of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance to the County Attorney's Office, and WHEREAS, those persons in violation of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance are Theodore Anthony Rojas, VI #1981, Joe R. Gonzales, Jr., VI #1983, and Pete Garcia, VI #1980, and WHEREAS, despite efforts by the Planning staff to resolve said matter, the violations have not been corrected, and WHEREAS, the Board deems it necessary to bring legal action against those individuals as hereinabove named to correct said violations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the Weld County Attorney be, and hereby is, authorized to proceed with legal action against Theodore Anthony Rojas, Joe R. Gonzales, Jr., and Pete Garcia to remedy the violations of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, and any other persons occupying the properties, any persons claiming an interest in the properties, and any persons acting in active concert with the identified parties. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 13th day of December, A.D., 1993. ATTEST: /War Weld County Clerk to the Board BY: 4 neputy Clerk to the Bi-ct APPROVED AS TO FORM: ounty Atto BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WEL COUNTY, COLORADO Constance , Chairman itutlitt W. H. ebster, Prry/Tem • `ZI,W e Baxter Dale K. Hall lam/ Al- fiixu4(AL- Barbara J. Kirkmeyer / PLosati CC : CR; P‘Y/aL. (a) 931269 to mEmoRAnDum Board of County Commissioners FrOT Department of Planning Services 1..7;n^^'•''_" December J 6, 1993 Legal Action Authorization Subject: The Department of Planning Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners authorize the Weld County Attorney to proceed with legal action against the following parties for violations of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. Zoning Ordinance Violations: VI -1981 Theodore Anthony Rojas 11470 Weld County Road 20 Ft. Lupton, CO 80621 VI -1983 Joe R. Gonzales, Jr. 11491 Weld County Road 20 Ft. Lupton, CO 80621 VI -1980 Pete Garcia 11530 Weld County Road 20 Ft. Lupton, CO 80621 The Department of Planning also recommends that the County Attorney be authorized to proceed with legal action against any other persona occupying the properties, any persons claiming an interest in the properties, and any persons acting in active concert with the identified parties. Copies of the violation materials are available at the Department of Planning Services' office or the Weld County Attorney's office. 931269 rt' __ ': ^ ' N. ) WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS OF : 12/13/93 INVOICE NUMBER ACCOUNT NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROJ DATE : 12/13/93 PAGE 1 WARRANT AMOUNT A211607 ADAMS COMMUNITY CORR PROD 111893 4211608 AGLAND INC A211609 BACHMAN, GORDON R 4211610 BANK 1, GREELEY NA A211611 CHAMPS A211612 CONDOS, DEBORAH 44901 004291 APRIL AUG FEB JANUARY JULY JUNE MARCH MAY OCT SEPT 01-2320-6350^NRDO 01 -2111 -6371 -GIVE 63 -9020 -6740 -DENT 79-104I-6143 01-1031-6350 01-1031-6350 01-1031-6350 01-1031-6350 01-.10 31-6350 01-1031-6350 01-1031-6350 01-1031-6350 01-1031-6350 01-1031-6350 103.00 103.00 12.81 12.81 109.00 115.00 224.00 s 3,132.04 2,689.38 2,111.71 1,853.96 3,064.64 2,944.75 2,607.95 2,980.96 3,192.30 3,224.67 27,802.36 �----= 113093 66-9020-6350 50.00 =_ 50.00 MI1193 21-6600-6375 29.00 29.00 WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS OF : 12/13/93 INVOICE NUMBER ACCOUNT NUMBER FO DEPT OBJ PROD DATE : 12/13/93 PAGE : 2 WARRANT AMOUNT A211613 CONNELL, CHARLES J. A211614 CONOCO INC CJC1193 21-6830-6358 GV1193 21 -6430 -6390 -GAS 21-6450-6390 21-6490-6390 A211615 CORRECTIONAL MGMT INC 111893 01-2320-6350-NRDO 4211616 DEEP ROCK NORTH A211617 DEMCO SUPPLY INC 4211618 DIAMOND SHAMROCK A211619 DUDLEY, LOLETTA A DEC93 771049 780522 GV1193 348.61 348.61 s -s 110.00 100.00 286.20 496.20 257.00 257.00 01-2111-6220-SERV 35.95 52-5560-6220 52-5570-6210 52-5580-6220 52-5570-6210 21-6440-6390-GA5 21-6490-6390 21-6890-6390 M11193 21-6600-6375 35.95 zs== 99.30 36.82 34.92 13.92 184.96 46.73 92.99 ----�--156.88 296.60 32.75 3z.7s S === WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS OF : 12/13/93 INVOICE NUMBER ACCOUNT NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROD DATE : 12/13/93 PAGE : 3 WARRANT AMOUNT 4211620 DURANT, SMELLY 4211621 DYNIX, INC. MI1193 033809 4211622 ELECTRONIC ANALYSIS C REPAIR 028091 21^6600-6375 52-5580-6940 52-5580-6360 A211623 EMERGENCY SVCS PUBLIC INFO OFFICERS OF COLO 1994MM 012110 -6335 -ADM A211624 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 5-109-48092 21-6600^6321 4211625 FIRST CLASS SEC SYSTEMS 002418 002419 A211626 FLAUGHER, JANET MI1193 24.00 000-~------- 24.00 x 4,800.00 41800.00 5- 19.95 19.95 50.00 o o-^oo 50.00 - --^oo^--4100 41.00 sz 52-5560-6363 42.50 52-5510-6360 57.00 99.50 xxx -'max-== 21-6600-6375 69,00 A211627 FT LUPTON FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 092293 01-9020-6399 69.00 131.00 o-000- 131.00 x x�x ZS -51t= WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTEF: AS OF : 12/13/93 INVOICE NUMBER ACCOUNT NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROJ DATE : 12/13/93 PACE : 4 WARRANT AMOUNT A211628 C C C FLIGHT, INC A211629 GALLEGOS, MARIE A211630 GUTIERREZ, TERESA A211631 HANSEN, DIXIE A211632 HANSEN, KAREN A2I1633 HERNANDEZ, BETTY A A211634 HIGHSMITH CO INC A211635 JOHNSTON, THOMAS R 931206 MI1182 MI1193 01 -2111 -6398 -JAIL 21-65106372 21-6590-6372 21-6600-6375 622.20 ----�....... 622.20 22.25 22.25 3.50 7.13 - 10.63 MI1193 21-6600-6375 46.25 21-6590-6372 7.50 53.75 M11193 21-6590-6372 7.50 21-6600-6375 102.25 MI1193 975387 780425 21-6600-6375 52-5510-6220 01-2111-6315-INCS 109.75 19.75 19.75 F5 71.44 ----�....... 71.44 68.47 WAP2000 WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS OF : 12/13/93 INVOICE NUMBER ACCOUNT NUMBER FD DEPT O5J PROJ DATE : 12/13/93 PAGE : 5 WARRANT A211635 JOHNSTON. THOMAS R 4211636 LARIMER CO COMM CORRECTNS 1I1893 4211637 LASELL, WARREN L A212638 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS A211639 MARTINEZ, AGNES M A211640 MARTINEZ, YSIDORA A A21164I NARANJO, ELIZABETH A211642 NEWBREY, RODIN L I220MI 111993 MI1193 1193M1 MI1193 101293 120893 01-23206350NRDO 0I-10416370 52-5580-6322 21-6600-6222 21-66006375 21-66006375 21-66006375 79-4I10-6143 794120-6143 AMOUNT 68.47 51.00 51.00 209.70 209.70 23.00 23.00 5.36 30.50 35.86 28.50 28.50 165.25 165.25 5,00 15.00 20.00 WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT R£GIST£R AS OF : 12/13/93 INVOICE NUMBER ACCOUNT NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROD DATE : 12/13/93 PAGE : 6 WARRANT AMOUNT A211643 NORTHERN ARMORED SERVICE 930112 52-5580-6310 22.00 A21164♦ OCCUPATIONAL MEALTMCARE MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC 120693 66-9020-6350 A211645 PERE2, LINDA L 4211646 RICO. SHEILA R A211647 RIZO, FRANCES A211648 RMR$ SYSTEM A211649 RODRIGUEZ, DOMINCA M11193 MI1193 MI1143 121093 2163106372 21-6420-6372 21-6430-6372-95 21-6430-6377 21-6440-6372-95 21-6440-6377 21-6600-6375 21-6600-6375 52-5510-6310 52-5560-6310 22.00 7,579.39 7,879.39 2.25 5.00 22.00 2.50 20.50 2.50 54.75 == === 24.00 24.00 12.00 12.00 ==-=== 600.00 400.00 1,000.00 MI1193 21-6600-6375 41.25 41.25 WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS OF : 12/13/93 INVOICE NUMBER ACCOUNT NUMBER FD DEPT 08J PROJ DATE : 12/13/93 PAGE : 7 WARRANT AMOUNT A211650 SCHOOL DISTRICT RE -I NOV93 A211651 SCHOOL DISTRICT RE -3J HSE1193 A211652 SCHRIEVER, KOLEEN W A211653 SCT MI1193 92995 A211654 SERVICE AMERICA CORP 073046 A211655 STREET, SHARON D A211656 TAPIA, MABEL 111893 M11193 A211657 TIP TOP MOBILE HOME SVC 19203 21-6600-6222 1,280.05 1,280,05 21-6600-6340 204.00 21-6600-6363 182.50 21-6600-6375 65,-1192-6350 01 -2110 -6370 -JAIL 01-2320-6370 21-6600-6375 25-9081-6398-93 386.50 32.50 32.50 166,667,00 166,667.00 s 134.35 134.35 __===========S= 121.96 121,96 31.00 31.00 2,100.75 2,100.75 WAP20OP WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS OF : 12/13/93 INVOICE NUMBER A211658 U PUMP -IT GV1293 4211659 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS ACCOUNT NUMBER FD DEPT 08J PROJ DATE : 12/I3/93 PAGE : 8 WARRANT AMOUNT 216430 -6390 -GAS 10.00 21-64906390 138.13 USW2193 21-6960-6345 313560636 67-1192-6345-LD 67-1192-6345-LOCL 313561212 67 -1192 -6345 -LOLL 313563850 671192-6345-LD 671192 -6345 -LOLL 313563975 67-1192-6345-LD 671192 -6345 -LOLL 313564356 67-1192-6345-LD 67 -1I92 -6345 -LOLL 313564525 671192-6345-LD 67-1192-6345-LOCL 313564966 67-1192-6345-LD 671192 -6345 -LOLL 313567408 67-1192-6345-LD 67-I192-6345-1DCL 313568016 67 -1192 -6345 -LOLL 313569919 6711926345 -LOLL A211660 VILLA AT GREELEV INC. 121893 01-2320-6350-TISP 0I-2320-6350-3/4 A211661 WELD COUNTY REVOLVING 12993 7744 7745 4211662 XEROX CORPORATION 01 -1062 -6360 -CC 01-2420-6370 0I-2420-6370 039844583 216950+6363 148.13 __ 375.40 5.66 88.33 167.46 12.40 157.14 31.75 43.18 25.98 43.66 210.23 I67.98 29.54 44.16 1.20 51.12 43.18 47.78 I,546.18 510.00 412.80 922.80 24.79 65.00 100.00 189.79 500.55 WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS OF : 12/13/03 INVOICE NUMBER ACCOUNT NUMBER FO DEPT OBJ PROJ DATE : 22/13/93 PAGE : 9 WARRANT AMOUNT A211662 XEROX CORPORATION 500.55 FINAL TOTAL : 219,714.19 WAP2OOP WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS OF : 12/13/93 DATE : 12/13/93 PAGE : 10 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT ALL ACCOUNTING AND BUDGETING PRODECURES HAVE BEEN COMPLETED ON THE ABOVE LISTED CLAIMS AS SHOWN ON PAGE 1 THROUGH 9 , AND DATED 12/13/93, AND THAT PAYMENTS SHOULD BE TO THE RESPECTIVE VENDORS IN THE AMOUNTS SET OPPOSITE THEIR NAMES, WITH THE TOTAL AMOUNT DATED THIS J5 TM •Ay OF i9 DIRECTOR -OF F'N�� E STRATTON SERVICES SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS "I511.\ DAY MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: MI COMMISSION EXPIRES JAN. 1,-1996 _ OF 1 g -Q3 ea?.19i• NOTARY PUBLIC WE, THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, HEREBY (APPROVE) (DISAPPROVE) THE CLAIMS AS SET FORTH ABOVE; AND WARRANTS IN PAYMENT THEREFORE ARE HEREBY ORDERED DRAWN UPON THE _` Scl]lLEXLF1l.._ FUND - TOTALING s_e24JtLi 193_. CHAIRMAN MEMBER ME TIER WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS OF : 12/13/93 INVOICE NUMBER ACCOUNT NUMBER FD DEPT OSJ PROD DATE : 12/13/93 PAGE : 1 WARRANT AMOUNT SR58IT4 RUPERT, LINDA ANN 5858175 WARNER, CYNTHIA R 5858176 *SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT S858177 ALLMER, LILLIAN CHRISTINE S858176 ARISPE, CYNTHIA 5858170 ARMENDARIZ, ROXANNE 5858180 BATT£RTON, MARSHA A 5858181 BOYETTE, STELLA 12-0001-2030 12-0001-2030 12-0001-2085 12-0001-2045 12-0001-2045 12-0001-2045 12-0001-2045 12-0001-2045 5.00 5.00 199.44 199.44 199.00 199.00 143.00 143.00 153.50 I53.50 67.50 67.50 160.00 160.00 486.50 486.50 xx=== WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS Off' : 12/13/93 INVOICE NUMBER ACCOUNT NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROD DATE : 12/23/93 PAGE : 2 WARRANT AMOUNT S858I32 BURBACK, DONA SUE 5858183 BUTLER, LUPE REGINA 5858184 CARDIO, SANDRA LUPE 5858185 CONTRERAS, LIONOR S858186 DURAN, SUE ANN S858187 FANSLER, BARBARA JO S858186 FARR, CRISTINA MELISSA S858189 FOOSE, TERRI JEAN I2-00012045 12-0001-2045 120001-2045 12-0001-2045 12-00012045 12-0001-2045 12-0001-2045 12-0001-2045 300.00 300.00 186.00 186.00 208.81 208.81 I40.50 140.50 95.50 95.50 2.50 2.50 30.00 30.00 77.00 77.00 WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGI$TE, AS OF : 12/13/93 INVOICE NUMBER ACCOUNT NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROJ DATE : 12/13/93 PAGE : 3 WARRANT AMOUNT 5858190 GALLEGOS' MARY LOUISE 5858191 GARCIA' KATHLEEN V 5858192 GARCIA' MARIA C $858193 GEIHSLER, TAMMY KAY 5858194 GLOVER, LINDA SUE 5858195 GONZALEZ, DENISE 5858196 GONZALEZ' CRISELDA 5858197 HERNANDEZ' CATHY 12-0001-2045 12-0001-2045 12-0001-2045 12-00012045 12-00012045 1200012045 12-0001-2045 12-0001-2045 50.00 50.00 168.00 ----�------- 168.00 98.75 x 98.75 50.00 50.00 1i2.62 rnrna -rn112.62 27.25 153.00 153.00 60.50 ----Y---60.50 WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS OF : 12/13/93 INVOICE NUMBER ACCOUNT NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROD DATE : 12/13/93 PAGE : 4 WARRANT AMOUNT S858198 HERNANDEZ, RACHEL JEAN 5858199 JOHNSON, BECKY ANN 5858200 LAGUARDIA, GALE GOMEZ S859201 LUEHRING, JOANN SUE S858202 MARCHAND, MICHELLE $658203 MARQUEZ, CHRISTINA RENE 5858204 MARTINEZ. DARLENE K 5858205 MASCARENAS, MILDRED E I2-0001-2045 12-00012045 12-000I-2045 12-0001-2045 12-0001-2045 12-0001zo4s 12-0001-2045 :;2-0001-2045 76.00 76.00 137.46 137.46 z 232.00 232.00 144.50 144.5Q sz=== 106.00 108.00 109.26 109.26 134.50 134.50 86.54 86.54 WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS OF : 12/13/93 INVOICE NUMBER 5858206 RASTERS, LINDA JOANN S858207 MCCHESNEY, PAMELA K 5656208 M£ZAMORAN, JULIE ANN 5858209 MIKSCH, TERESA ANN sessno MIKSCH, TERESA ANN 5858211 NILSESTUEN, DIANE LENISE 5858212 PERALES, CHARLOTTE 5858213 RAINWATER, SANDRA ACCOUNT NURSER FD DEPT OBJ PROJ DATE : 12/13/93 PAGE : $ WARRANT AMOUNT 12-0001-2045 12-0001-2045 12-0001-2045 12-0001-2045 12-0001-2045 12-0001-2045 12-0001-2045 12-0001-2045 I57.16 157.16 246.30 246.30 137.50 --137.50 62.65 62.65 77.50 77.50 40.00 40.00 23.08 23.08 184.15 184.15 a WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTEQ AS OF : 12/I3/93 INVOICE NUMBER ACCOUNT NUMBER FD DEPT 08J PROJ DATE : 12/13/93 PAGE : 6 WARRANT AMOUNT 15858214 REYES, CLINDA I 5858215 ROBBINS, DONNA A 15858226 ROUSES DEBRA SUE 5858217 SALAZAR, BLANCA 5858218 SALAZAR, THERESA 5858219 SANCHEZ, SALLY 15858220 SANDOVAL, FRANCES MARY S858221 SCHILL, EDWARD ANTHONY 12-00012045 12-0001-2045 120001-2045 12-0001-2045 12-0001-2045 12_0001-2045 12-00012048 12-0001-2045 76.15 76,15 55.00 55.00 75.00 75.00 __- 85,50 85.50 13.08 '13.08 25.00 25.00 2.30 2.30 83,52 83,52 _ WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS OF : I2/13/93 INVOICE NUMBER ACCOUNT NUMBER FD DEPT O8J PROJ DATE : 12/13/93 PAGE : 7 WARRANT AMOUNT S859222 SPRINGER, KAREN ELAINE S858223 TRUJILLO, MARIA CHRISTINA I2-0001-2045 12-000I-2045 FINAL TOTAL : 200.00 200.00 100.00 100.00 5,846.52 WAP2OOP WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS OF : 22/23/93 DATE : 12/I3/93 PAGE : 8 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT ALL ACCOUNTING AND BUDGETING PRODECURES HAVE SEEN COMPLETED ON THE ABOVE LISTED CLAIMS AS SHOWN ON PAGE 1 THROUGH 7 p AND DATED 12/13/93, AND THAT PAYMENTS SHOULD 3E TO THE RESPECTIVE VENDORS IN THE AMOUNTS SET OPPOSITE THEIR NAMES, WITH THE TOTAL AMOUNT DATED THIS ZELL_ 19 93 . DIRECTOR OF �FAry CE AND AMIN RATION SERVICES SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS J - DAY OF a -ataeatiR_V • MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: MT COMMISSION EXPIRES JAN. 1, iS NOTARY PUBLIC WE, THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, HEREBY (APPROVE) (DISAPPROVE) THE CLAIMS AS SET FORTH ABOVE; AND WARRANTS IN PAYMENT THEREFORE ARE HEREBY ORDERED DRAWN UPON C /1 THE ,2=jj �et5FUMD - TOTALING s1_y, J 5��y12 DATED THIS !Silt/DAY 5 l tI DAY OF `-'a LL � WELD COUNTY CLERK TO THE BOARD DUTY MEMBER MEMBER MEMBER MEMBER WWP952PA WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUN1Y DATE : 12/13/93 COIN WARRANT REGISTER REPORT PAGE : 1 PAYROLL DATE 12/13/93 INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER NUMBER fD DEPT OBJ PROD AMOUNT 1831581 NORTH CO. CREMETORY 831582 AGUIRRE. GEORGIA 831583 ARTEAGA, ROSARIO 831584 CAZARES, MARIA 83I585 GONZALES. RACHELLE 831586 KIEDER, LESLIE LEROY 631587 MAR7INEZ, ANNA D 04579602 06923892 06923 692 06864492 06864492 06273292 06273292 07020892 07020892 07011692 07011692 05655192 05655192 12 -4440 -6396 -BUR 805.00 805.00 12 -4433 -6710 -SUP 12 -4433 -6710 -SUP 93.00 219.00 312,00 12-4433-6720-5UP 116.00 I2 -4433 -6710 -SUP 207.00 12 -4433 -6710 -SUP I2-4433-6710-5UP 323.00 198.00 262.00 460.00 124433-6710-5UP 185.00 12-4433-6710-5UP 185.00 12-4433-6710-5UP 12-443367I0SUP 12-4433-6710-5UP 12 -4433 -6710 -SUP 370.00 55.00 177.00 -- 232,00 212.00 212.00 • 424.00 WWP952PA WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY COIN WARRANT REGISTER REPORT PAYROLL DATE 12/13/93 DATE : 12/13/93 PAGE : 2 INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROJ AMOUNT 831588 POPELKA, NADINE M 831589 SANTOS) VERONICA R 831590 VOLPE, CHRISTINA M 831591 GARCIA, CHERYL A 831592 CORTEZ, MARY L 831593 DUVALL. HEATHER M 831594 FEOLA♦ LINDA 831595 GOMEZ, GUADALUPE 07026592 22 -4433 -671O -SUP 354.00 07016592 12 -4433 -6710 -SUP 372.00 03896392 03896392 1244336710 -SUP 12 -4433 -6710 -SUP 726.00 =-= 256.00 432.00 688.00 07024892 12-4433-6710SUP 187.00 07024892 12 -4433 -6710 -SUP 356.00 543.00 07016692 06192492 06305092 06305092 1244336710 -RE 124433-6732-RET 12-4433-6732-RET 12-4433-6732RET 03944092 12-44336732-RET 06996192 06996192 06996192 12-44336732-RET 12-4433-6732-RET 1244336732-RET 280.00 280.00 =====-======-. 356.00 356.00 50.00 280,00 z-= 330.00 96.00 96.00 353.00 512.00 512.00 z» z 1,377.00 WWP9S2PA WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY COIN WARRANT REGISTER REPORT PAYROLL DATE 12/13/93 INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROD 831596 HOVER, LOTTIE M 831597 JARAMILLO, SILVIA 831598 LOPEZ. GUADALUPE 831599 MORALES, GUSTAVO 831600 OCHOA, JORGE 831601 ORTIZ, LUZ 831602 RODRIGUEZ, ELIZABETH 831603 ROMERO' NAOMI J 04955392 04955392 03192792 03192792 07013092 06238892 05600492 06413492 06413492 06413492 06413492 06963092 06811692 DATE : 12/13/93 PAGE : 3 AMOUNT 12-4433-6732-RET 12-4433-6732-RET 28.00 285.00 313.00 12+4433-6732-RET 20.00 12-4433-6732-RET 58.00 78.00 12-4433-6732-RET 12-4433-6732-RET 12-4433-6732-RET 12-4433-6732-RET 12-4433-6732-RET 12-4433-6732-RET 12-4433-6732-RET _ 207.00 207.00 325.00 323.00 119.00 119.00 23.00 72.00 72.00 280.00 447.00 12-4433-6732-RET 280.00 280.00 sa== 12-4433-6732-RET 280.00 280.00 WWP952PA WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY COIN WARRANT REGISTER REPORT PAYROLL DATE 12/13/93 DATE : I2/13/93 PAGE : 4 INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROD AMOUNT 831604 SANCHEZ, GAYLENE P 831605 VILLALPANDO, JOSE I 831606 WEBB, ROSEMARY 05915092 07031592 02490692 124433-6710..DI5 12-4433-6732—RET 124433-6732—RET FINAL TOTAL 50.00 50.00 -- rae= 317•00 317.00 213.00 a 213.00 a 9,952.00 - a=== WWP95ZPA WELD COUNTY COIN WARRANT REGISTER REPORT PAYROLL DATE 12/13/93 DATE ; 12/13/93 PAGE : 5 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT ALL ACCOUNTING AND BUDGETING PROCEDURES HAVE SEEN COMPLETED ON THE ABOVE LISTED CLAIMS AS SHOWN ON PAGE 1 THROUGH 4 , AND DATED 12/13/93, AND THAT PAYMENTS SHOULD BE TO THE RESPECTIVE VENDORS IN THE AMOUNTS SET OPPOSITE THEIR NAMES1 WITH THE TOTAL AMOUNT 1 LQ�// DATED THIS 1 5 DIRECTOR OF AN YSDMINYSTRATION SERVICES SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS 1y5_ DAY OF CYa(,fama'tl' 19 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JAN.'1 1 . MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: __-a_ - NOTARY PUBLIC WE, THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, HEREBY (APPROVE) (DISAPPROVE) THE CLAIMS AS SET FORTH ABOVE; AND WARRANTS IN PAYMENT THEREFORE ARE HEREBY ORDERED DRAWN UPON THE L5a7iv-r-ir E..J FUND - TOTALING Q f�J- 112(2a DATES THIS DAY OF Q3.cla,}L1 [L� 19 CLERIC TO - WELD COUNTY CLERRK TO THE BOARD in MEMBE R CHAIRMAN MEMBER MEMBER WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT' REGISTER A5.OF: 12/14/93 INVOICE NUMBER DATE 2'12/14/93 PAGE S I ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT FD DEPT 08J PROJ - AMOUNT A2I1663 ACCOMMODATION SANITATION 1571 A211664 ACTION PAGE 12193 A2II665 ADDICTION RECOVERY CENTER 121393 A211666 AGLAND INC A211667 AIM'S FLIGHT CENTER 153954 154132 K52657 K52776 K52966 L 39420 139550 1166 1214 47667 ' 47668 47669 47675 47721 63866 77-5300-6533 77-5300-6345' 77-5310-6345 01-2320-6358 011061 -6340 -ROAD 01 -1061 -6340 -ROAD 01 -1D61 -6340 -ROAD 01 -1061 -6340 -ROAD 01-1061-6340^ROAD 01 -1061 -6340 -ROAD 01 -1061 -6340 -ROAD 77-5310-6362 ' 77-5310-6362 77-5300-6231 77-5300-6231 77 -5310 -6250 -AUTO 77 -5310 -6250 -AUTO 77 -5310 -6250 -AUTO 77-5310-6599 A211668 ALLEN. PATRICK Co. ND/PC FORENSIC PATHOLOGY CONS 112193 01-2180-6350 60.00 60.00 =xaa=ax======s= 88.50 88.50 177.00 ss===fl===sz=r_ 340.00 340.00 ===x====s====s= 145.70 131.60 127.50 145.70 ' 70.50 129.25 117.50 339.98 658.36 440.34 347.87 447.50 447.50 447.50 3.986.80 ===x=s=x=axss =' 735.60 735.60 ===x=X=2===s=x= 695.00 NAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTEl AS OF : 12/14/93 INVOICE NUMBER ACCOUNT NUMBER FD DEPT 08J PROJ DATE :12/14/93 PAGE : 2 WARRANT AMOUNT A211668 ALLEN PATRICK C.. MD/PC FORENSIC PATHOLOGY CONS 091893 01-2180-6350 112193 01-2180-6350' A2I1669 ALLISON. DIANA G 093093 103193 113093 A211670 AMER SAFETY ASSN OF COLO 9646 A211671 AMERICAN PAYROLL ASSOC 121093 A211672 ARC A2I1673 ARGUS BUSINESS • 8735 079016 A211674 ARTHUR J GALLAGHER 6 CO 15656 15657 01-1061-6370 01-1061-6370 01-1062-6370 60-2160-6225 01-I152-6330' 216950-6379 01-3182-6330 66 -9020 -6510 -WC 66 -9020 -6510 -SC 705.00 695.00 2,095.00 =2=22a======2ss 18.00 13.50 11.2B - 42.75 ===s=========2: 680.95 680.95 ===========ttfl= 125.00 125.00 =====stfl2==rar 79.50 ---;9.50 432.50 432.50 =====s=====a2=t 36,177.00 4,500.00 40,677.00 =======S2rrt=rt WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS OF c' 12/14/93 INVOICE NUMBER ACCOUNT NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROD ' DATE- 12/14/93 PAGE I 3 WARRANT AMOUNT A211675 AVIATION COMMUNICATIONS 8345 8372 77-5310-6250-PILT 77-5320-6250-PILT A211676 AVIATION LABORATORIES 26772 77-5310-6250-PILT A211677 BESTWAY CONCRETE A211678 BFI WASTE SYSTEMS A211679 BIG R OF GREELEY 119964 120177 9311 348358 348930 349082 349198 355934 356268 356960 357044 357133 357296 357610 358901 359177 359548 361284 363177 02-I06I-6360-CC 01 -1061 -6360 -CC 77-5300-6366 77-5310-6366 77-5300-6241 77-5300-6241 77-5300-6241 77-5300-6241 77-5300-6362 77-5300-6220 77-5300-6241 77-5300-6220 77-5300-6220 77-5300-6220 77-5300-6241 77-5300-6362' 77-5300-636 2 77-5300-6220 77'5300-622O 77-5300-6220 10108.49 217.93 1,326.42 74.70 - ... 74.70 244.63 51.50 - ---�....... 296.13 =sin —ant -2==a= 40.68 40.69 ----r--T81.37 a aaaasr=r 44.68 17.66 71.47 25.96 , 7.62 14.28 10.56 17.70 7.99 ' 6.69 7.89 7.69 3.35 5.55 11.00 27.87 287.96 as=r===saa=s=rs WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUM BE R WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTE2 AS OF Z12/14/93 INVOICE NUMBER ACCOUNT NUMBER FD DEPT 084 PROJ DATE t 12/14/93 PAGE : 4 WARRANT AMOUNT 4211680 BIG R OF GREELEY A211681 BOULDER COUNTY 363387 77.5300-6220 50874 77-5300-6362 PIPELIN£HREAK 01-9020-6599 A211682 BREWER, LONNY OR CONSTANCE W493311 W493312 4211683 BURROWS, SUE 4211604 CARRIER WEST A21I685 CITY OF GREELEY 4211686 CJ PRINTING 24_9334-63974715 24-9034-6397-4715 50.94 16.96 67.90 3,308.31 3,'308.31 __=========n=Y 100.00' 429.00 529.00 =sac= ===z 28297 60-2160-6599 413.60 FREIGHT 86037 DEC 01 -1061 -6233 —CC 01-1061'-6233CC 413.60 4.61 264.86 269.47 =3=======s==a-= 01-2150-6350 56,614.66 56. 614.66 s -s" 3089 64-1155+6320 273.76 3092 64-1x55-6320 52.78 326.54 =ass===n==ax=== MAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY' WARRANT REGISTER AS OF = 12/14/93 INVOICE NUMBER ACCOUNT NUMBER FD DEPT 08J PROJ DATE s 12/14/93 PAGE : 5 WARRANT AMOUNT A211687 CLARK, KELLY A211688 CLINGAN, ERVIN 23593 N292509' A211689 COLO DEPT OF REVENUE 113093 A211690 COLD INCINERATION SERVICES INC 29442 421I691 COLO METALLIZING 0 MACH 1890 60-2160-6599 24=9034-6397-4715 77-5310-6599 01=2310 -6220 -SUDS' 01 -1061 -6360 -CC A211692 COLO STATE COMPENSATION -INSURANCE 4UTNORITY 5637 77-5300-6142 5638 77-5300-6142 A211693 COLO STATE UNIVERSITY E 22982 E22982 A211694 COLO STATE UNIVERSITY 57111 01-3400-6210 01-3400-6210 77.39 77.39 ____=====aaasrs '293.00 293.00 _a= =s -s= 829.81 829.81 a IC 3.3 33.22 ^--33.22 __==========22= 210.50 2'10.50 2,614.00 69,00- 2,545.00 39.30 156.35 195.65 s====sass=a===a 01-2990-6210 2.30 WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTEI AS OF : 12/14/93 INVOICE NUMBER ACCOUNT NUMBER FO DEPT 08J PROJ DATE : 12/14/93 PAGE : 6 A211694 COLO STATE UNIVERSITY 57347 A211695 CONOCO INC A211696 CORLISS, HERBERT 0 GV1193 C V 1193 1193GV WARRANT AMOUNT 01-2990-6370 41.40 22-6450-6390 21-6490-6390 21 -6430 -6390 -GAS MI1210 01-1041-6370 A2I1697 CORPORATE HEALTH C MEDICAL PROGRAMS INC 103193 29 -41.40 -6350 -TB A211698 COX. TYLER C A211699 004306 63-90206740-VISN CRESCENT ELECTRIC SUPPLY' 10130456100 10130468500 10130474100 10130502900 10134060100 A211700CUNLIFFE, JR.. CHAS A 9110462299 01 -10"61 -6236 -CC 01-1061-6236CC 01 -10"61 -6236 -CC 01-106Te6236-CC 01 -10'61 -6236 -CC 791914-6143 semeneenindean 43.70 ========fl=s=== 10.00 22.50 65.00 97.50 ===as==z=z===== 66.00 66.00 360.00 360.00 ____=====z===aa 114.95 114.95 ==Cs===*=sals=a" 59.76 138.28 32.50 77.51 17.00 325.05 30.00 W 30.00 ===z===szz=asza WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER VELD COUNTY. WARRANT REGISTER' A5 OF : 12/14/93 INVOICE NUMBER A211701 DAVISON. LESTER A 004307 A211702 DENVER HARDWARE CO S 6 H. 02061 4211703 DINGES. GEORGE L 4211704 DOMINGUEZ, A M 004308 ACCOUNT NUMBER FD DEPT OBJPROJ 63 -9020 -6740 -DENT 01 -1061 -6360 -CC 01 -1061 -6360 -CC 63 -9020 -6740 -DENT DATE : 12/14/93 PAGE : 7 WARRANT AMOUNT 233.50 233.50 ==a=x===s===a=s 5.30 17.29 22.59 186.00 186.00 x===sa===s=s=== 090793 79-1123-6143 470.75 27436. 79-1123-614 3 4211705 DON'S MAINTENANCE SERVICE 3889 3892 3966 A211706 DROEGENU£LLER, 8. RENEE 121093 A211707 DUTENHOEFFER. PAMELA A 004309 61-9020-6360 61-9020-6360 61-9020-6360 285.00 755.73 191.35 29.35 485.70 ~-r -706.'40 _____="n===s=== 79-I041-6143 5.00 5.00 ====ss=======i 63 -9020 -6740 -BENT 65.00 65.00 =s=====_=====n. WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUN BER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER ASOF: 12/14/93 INVOICE NUMBER DATE : 12/14/93 PAGE : ACCOUNT NUMBER - WARRANT' FD DEPT -OBJ PROD ' AMOUNT 4211708 EASTERN NEWS DISTRIBUTORS 88798 4211709 FEUERSTEIN, MARY A DEC 93 A211 710 FIRST TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION 6973030 A211711 FLIETHNAN, KIM A 004310 A211712 FLOOD C PETERSON INS CO 12393 4211 71 3 FORTIS BENEFITS' A211714 GALLEGOS, STEPHANIE 121593 121493 A211715 GREELEY DAILY TRIBUNE THE 29616 77-5310-6250-PILT 01-1025-6370 01-9020-6620 63 -9320 -6740 -DENT 77-5300-6510 77-5300-6140 77-5310-6140 14.75 14.75 =====3=====____ '270.22 ' 270.22 37,104.00 - --�_...-..... — 37,104.00 _____________ 24.00 - ---d.mp---MME 24.00 ===3=======asses 141.00 141,00 910.77 139,75 1,050.52 »__ 33== 21-6490-6398-OPSI 160.00 ' 160.00 ====f===3=m==z ' 7T-5300'-6337 9.00 ____=___ 9.80 WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTE2 AS OF : 12/14/93 INVOICE NUMBER A211716 GREELEY GAS CO A211717 GREELEY GAS CO A211718 GREELEY LOCK C KEY 001193 031193 041193 12827 1471 39117 4282 SA1193 581193 SC 1193 531193 5E1193 5G1193 5111193 5300 61285 6739 7218 74813 7713 7783 9514 46515 4211719 GREELEY WELD CNTY AIRPORT 529 530 531 532 533 DATE 12/14/93 PAGE : 9 ACCOUNT 'NUMBER PD DEPT 081 PROJ 77-5300-6344 77.4310'6344 77-5300-6344 77-5300-634'4 ' ' 01-10'61 6344-8GNQ 01-10'61'-6344-;CMA I 01-2061-6344-LI'8 01-1061-6344-5AMB 77-5300-6344 77-53'00-6344 77-5300'-634'4 77-5300-634'4 77-5300'-6344 77-5300'-6344 77-5300-6344 07 -10'61-634'4-G I1.C' 01-10'61-6344-CC'JA 01-1061-634'4-CMA3' 01 -10'61 -6340 -ROAD 01-1061-6344-CKA2 01 -10'61 -6340 -ROAD 01 -1061 -6340 -ROAD 01 -1061 -6340 -ROAD 77-5310-6220 77-5300-6379 77 -5310 -6250 -PICT 77-5300-6379 77-5300-6599 77-5310-6250-PILT WARRANT AMOUNT 92.94 149.04 '45.64 1,"808.04 162.66 587.41 145.24 18.79 '35.93 22.48 84.64 ' 36.26 53.80' 50.37 59.77 102:829.1 2 14,182.'13 =======ssx===z= ---s ' 19.51 289.92 284.43 133.99 162.76 164.53 -1,055.14 s2?= 17.12 17.12 =s sus==z= 37.54 61.22 13.47 1.700.00 72.19 1,884.42 WAP2D0P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS OF -:-12/14/93 INVOICE NUMBER A211720 GREELEY WELD CNTY AIRPORT 102593 11I193 71993 81693 82593 82793 91393 92493 92793 A211722 GREELEY WINNELSON CO 128230 128501 128573 128645 ACCOUNT NUMBER FD DEPT 084 PROJ GATE-: 12/14/43 PAGE 10 WARRANT AMOUNT 77-5300-6220 77-5300-6367 77-5310-6220 77-5300-6337 77-5300-6337 77-5300-6337 77-63106362 77-5310-6533 77-5310-6311 77-5300-6337 01 -10'61 -6235 -CC O1 -1061 -6235 -CC '01 -10'61 -6235 -CC 01 -1061 -6235 -CC A211722 HAAS, ROBERTA A 1210MI 0'1-1041-6370 A21I723 HART. I. L 9303537803 79-2310'-614'3 A211724 HART, MILM.A. - 121393 01-2320-6358 211725 HEATH JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 2202 60-2160=6599 2.00 4.40 ♦.95 9.00 4.45 2.16 ' .35 21.48' 2.90 4.12 55.81 ===s===s=s==fl 3.50 184.70 144.15 7.84 340.19 ±====flsas=sass 211.50' 211.50 'axas'ss'ssasi=z sa 39.00 39.00 ============= • 50'0.00 50'0.00 40.00 40.00 =============- WAP200P map COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS OF : 12/14/93 DATE : 12/14/93 PAGE 11 WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROJ AMOUNT A211726 HEDIN, LILA GAYE 4211727 HUGH N. WOODS 4211728 ICS DEC 93 66351 66525 SHIPPING 30150 A211729 J P FLYTE PRODUCTS 218 4211730 JEPP£SEN SANDERSON DEPT 280 22576 211731 JOHN WILEY C SONS, INC 3136N 4211732 JOHNSON, NARK R A21I733 JONES, DONALD E 004311 1209RI 01-1021-6370 14.50 77..5300-6220 77-5300-6220 012310-6220-SUOP 01-2310-6220-SUOP 77-5310-6250-PILT 77-5310-6250—PILT 01-1123-6229' 63-9o20-6740=DENT 01-01041e6370 14.30 38.0♦ ' 49.99 88.03 =‘=i=.4========= 70.80 490,00 '560.80 ======`======== ' 265.20 265.20 ssas sfsassn xa:s '389.70 389.70 =352=92t======= 82.41 --_-r ....... - 82.41 SZ=s======xaSss 140.50 I40.50 2=====393=2=ys= 87.00 WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER ASOF:"12/14/93 INVOICE NUMBER' A211733 JONES, DONALD E ACCOUNT'NUMBER FD.DEPT OSJ PROD. DATE=12/I4/93 PAGE a 12 WARRANT AMOUNT A211734 JOSSEY-BASS, INC PUBLISHERS 11593 19-4110-6382 A211735 KAISER FOUNDATION A21I736 KIMMICK, MICHAEL W 27939 60-2160-6599 12893 A211737 KINDSFATHER, MARTHA R 004312 A211738 KING SOOPERS A211739 LEMAN C ASSOCIATES A211740 LLAMAS, BENJAMIN 418767 110478 194170.-6370+P 19-4170-6370-W 19-4170-6370-2 63 -9020 -6740 -DENT 21-6600-6222 77»5300-6210 775310-62I0' 87.00 xxx3=sasxssxass' • 3.00 3.00 =s=s=s=s=sss= n ' 554.00 554.00 =========;=2= == 14.75 2,50 19.75 36.00 3.00 3.00 ======ssse=xsx' 25.09 25.09 ==xz=s===s===sx. 35.19 35.19 70.38 .ss===sxssxzz=s= 121493 216490-6398—OYTO74.00 74.00 =Yaaxannss_a_ NAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER MELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS OF : 12/14/93 INVOICE NUMBER A211741 LOFTUS. CYNTHIA M A211742 MARTINEZ. ANDRES 632813 581283 A211743 MILITARY VEHICLES MAGAZINE 12893 A211744 MONARCH PLUMB SUPPLY CO 00034363 A211745 MONFORT OF CO 63834 A211746 MONTGOMERY ELEVATOR CO 583657 A211747 MOORE BEARING COMPANY' 71682 71695 A211748 MOTOROLA NO210173 ACCOUNT NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROJ 4444 79-1021-6143 11-3140-6229 77-5300-6333 01 -1061 -6235 -CC 77-5310-6599 01-10 61 -6360 -CC 77-5300-6367 77-53006367' ' 01.2153-6350' DATE : 12/14/93 PAGE : 13 WARRANT AMOUNT 49.00 49.00 z==s===zsr_=ss—_ 42,61 42.61 ' 15.00 15.00 szza=s=s===t=sz '495.20 495.20 75.00 T 75.00 =====t=5======= 971.54 444444444-44444 971.54 =i=t===s=s===1S -• - 65.88 131.76 197.6♦ •=s=s ss=S=== s= s= 28,500.00 _4_.;44 ... .;.._. 28.500.00 ssssasaz=====s= WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS OF : 12/14/93 INVOICE NUMBER A211749 MTN VIEW FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT PIPELINEBREAK A211750 NATL GRAPHICS COMPANY 331530 4211751 NATL INFORMATION DATA CENTER 1994 A211752 NEWCO INC A211 75 3 1268 137378 137605 137753 138198 138505 138645 138646 138683 NORTH WELD COUNTY WATER DISTRICT 201193 231193 321193 491193 781193 A21175♦NORTHERN ARMORED SERVICE 12193 ACCOUNT NUMBER ' FD DEPT OBJ.PROJ: DATE 2 12/14/93 PAGE : 14 'WARRANT AMOUNT 01-90206599 01-1031-6330 01-1031-6330 01 -1061 -6236 -CC 01 -1361 -6236 -CC 01 -1061 -6236 -CC 01-1061-6236CC 01 -1061 -6236 -CC 01 -1061 -6236 -CC 01 -1061 -6236 -CC 01 -1061 -6236 -CC 01 -1061 -6236 -CC 77-5300-6342 775300-6342' 77-5300-6342 77-53006342 77-5310+6342 2,205.00 2,205.00 ===2====x3__-=- 22.30 22.30 =============ts 34.90 ----�M... 34.90 =============t 12.06- 16.14 6.50 66.68 38.60 26.20 141.60 13.00 2.16 298.82 19.20 17,00 ' 17.00 77.90 23.05 154.15 77-5300-6358 ' 30.97 77-5310+6358' 30.98 61.95 _-====s=====t= WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS OP : 12/14/93 INVOICE NUMBER ACCOUNT NUMBER FD DEPT 08J PRDJ DATE 12/14/93 PAGE : IS WARRA NT AMOUNT A211755 NORTHERN CO GRAPHICS, INC 10076 A211756 NORTHERN COLO DISPOSAL 12693 4211757 ORKIN EXTERMINATING INC 11893 A211758 05SAKI I MUTSU A211759 OTIS, FRED L 4211760 PATTEN, BARBARA J A21I761 PATTEN, ELVIN D MI1193 004313 004314 112593 004316 0043I5 030493 1I2493 121093 77-5310'-6210 77-5300-6365 77-5310-6366 01-3400-6370 63 -9020 -6740 -DENT 63-9020-6740-VISN 77-5300-6352 63-9020-6740-VISN 63 -93'20 -6740 -DENT' 79-2310-6143 79-2310-614'3 79-2310-6143 79-2310-6143 498.30 -----r----- 498.30 23.00 23.00 x===«=2=====_,;_ 40 .00 40.00 15.75 249.38 28.00 293.13 _======_====z== 72.50 72.50 ===_==2=x2=2= 126.20 M --- 126.20 39.00 39.00' 9.73 39.00 83.08 209.81 ====lax===2=== WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS OF : 12/24/93 INVOICE NUMBER A211762 PERSON, LAWRENCE C DATE 12/14/93 PAGE : 16 ACCOUNT NUMBER' WARRANT ' FD DEPT' OBJ PROD ' AMOUNT 1210 HI 01-1041-6370 A211763 PETTY CASH HEALTH DEPARTMENT 0262 0263 026♦ 0265 0266 0267 026'8 0269 0270 0271 0272 0274' 0275 0276 0277 A211764 PETTY CASH BLDG C GRNDS 120793 120993 60751 7751391 885I08 88736 88747 89014 A211765 PHILLIPS 66 COMPANY 143015 231015 876928 895314 19-41'40-649'5 19-4140'-6311-SU'I 19-414O6370-CD'P 19-41706382-A 19-4110'-6320-HHW 19-41406495 19-41'10'-6379-TP 19-4140-6311-SUI 19-41'40'-6495 19-41'40-6495 1941113-6220 19-4140-6220-IMM 19-4140-6495 19-41I0-6495 19 -41'40 -6322 -MCP OY-"A16360"CC 01 -1061 -6360 -CC 01-1061-6360-cC 01 -1061 -6360 -CC 01 -106I -6360 -CC 01 -1061+6360 -CC 01 -1061 -6360 -CC 01 -1061 -6360 -CC 77 -5310 -6599 -PHIL 77 -5310 -6599 -PHIL- 77-5310-6250-JETA 77-5310-6250-JETA 110.75 ' 110 .7 5 =====S32tz===22 5.00 7.21 1.00' 2.11 15.00 5;00 11.27 8.$0 7.00 7.00 6.b0 ' 2.50 2.00 12.00 .23 97.62 axis=====2=C=2= 14.96 3.20 10.80 3.99 1.57 2.33 4.94 I.89 43.68 2=_=r_==assxss= I,489.84- 2,076.45 -7,272.08 730'8.79 11,014.58 ====2==x2===sss WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS 'OF :-12/14/93 INVOICE NUMBER ACCOUNT NUMBER PO DEFT' OBJ PROD A211766 PIONEER CLEANERS DATE : 12/14/93 PAGE : 17 WARRANT AMOUNT 931I30 01-2110-6390-TRNG 368,00 *211767 PITNEY BOWES DEPT E M 673545 77-5300-6311 A211768 POSTAGE BY PHONE SYSTEM 12893 77-5300'-6311 77-5310-6311 A211769 PRICE, LYNN L 368.00 ============== 117.73 117.73 =s= 100.'00 '100.00 ' 200 .00 .======i========= 102893 79-11'91-6147 '203."00 A211770 PUBLIC SERVICE CO OF COLO 10432 1099 1287D 25609 27 307600 3I472 36785 5091 A211771 PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF WELD COUNTY 120193 1213MA 01 -1061 -6340 -ROAD 01 -1061 -634'1 -VETS 01 -1061 -6340 -ROAD 01 -1061 -6340 -ROAD 01-1061-6341-GXLC 01-1061-6341-CCJA 01=10`61-6340ROAD 01-1061-6341-MSGL 01 -1061 -6340 -ROAD 203.00 67.49 80.39 852.65 23413 "4.55 15.915.71 58.45 68.45 '172.02 17,242.84 ==== 2==== 25-9071-6398-L' 13.00 25-9071-6398-L' 13.00 26.00 WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER MELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS OF : I2/14/93 INVOICE NUMBER A211772 R D STEWART 113093 A211773 RAYS OFFICE EQUIP INC 5276 A211774 REICHERT* JANET M. A211775 REIF* JEFFREY R 120893 004317 A211776 RICHTER PLUMBING £ NTNG 3679 A211777 ROCKY MTN READY MIX 22384 A211778 ROCKY MTN SUPPLY. INC 115748 115812 A211779 S -CARGO TRUCK CAPS ACCOUNT NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROJ 22-9020-6920-HHW 01-1125-6212 01-11526370 63-90'20-6740-VISN 60-2160-6360 01 -1061 -6360 -CC 01 -1061 -6233 -CC 01 -1061 -6233 -CC DATE : 12/14/93 PACE : 28 WARRANT AMOUNT 26.356.50 26,336.50 163.80 163.80 ==== ======= ss= 12.50 12.50 ==== raisin= 150.00 150.00 109.61 109.61 235.40 235.40 =_===z==== 400.7I 16.50 417.21 7754 64+1155-6212 339.00 339.00 =============as WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTE; AS OF : 12/14/93 INVOICE NUMBER ACCOUNT NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROJ A211780 SADUSKY, JR, STANLEY J 1208MI 12131IC A211781 SCHOOL 'DISTRICT *6 7656 7657 7658 7667 7668 4211 782 SCOBY* JERRY L 4211783 SCOTT* DOREEN J A21178♦ SEILER* KATHRYN 4211 785 SID* HARVEY A211786 SIGNED WITH PRIDE 1210MI DATE : 12/14/93 PAGE : 19 WARRANT AMOUNT 01-1041-6370 01-1041-6229 21-6600-6210 21-6600-6210 21-6600-6210 21-6600-6224 21-6600-6224 36.25 191.00 227.25 ========== 164.91 839.43 497.89 916,00 5• 54 2,423.77 01-I041-6370 126.50 126.50 12993 19-4170-6370-W 86 .2 5 DEC 93 SHIPPING 131I13488 131113761 86.25 01-10'25-6370 28.50 01 -10'61 -6233 -CC 01 -1061 -6233 -CC 01 -I061 -6233 -CC 28.50 = __ 2.30 118.30 140.16 260.76 111393 77-53I0-6250-PILT 264.00 264.00 ___=====ss===== WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER MELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER: AS OF : 12/14/9S INVOICE NUMBER DATE : 12/14/93 PAGE 20 ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT FD DEPT 08J PROD: AMOUNT 4211707 SIGNS FIRST 4211788 SIRCHIE 4211789 STAMP -KO A211790 STRONG/ DOROTHY J 1122 FREIGHT 0073818 -IN 17688 121493 121493 A211791 THOMPSON PUBLISHING GROUP 9194428 A211792 THOMPSON, DARLINE A211793 THOMPSON, GREG A211794 TSUKAMOTO, JUDITH A 121093 120693 NOV 93 77-5300-6220 01 -2111 -6220 -GRIM 01 -2111 -6220 -GRIM 19-4110-6210 01-3700-6370' 01-3700-6370' 01-9020-6322 19-41'10-6370 01-1014-6370 01-1021-6370 99.00 99,00 =s=s=z=szs==ss= 17408 505.29 522.37 =======a=a===a= 9.90 ' 9,90 ===s=xasza====s 8425 21.16 29.41 21'5.00 215.00 ===a===sa====== 39.'83 39.83 ____====s=__n 20.00 20.00 ========soars z=... 75.00 WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS OF : 12/14/93 INVOICE NUMBER 4211794 TSUKANOTO, JUDITH A 75.00 ACCOUNT NUMBER FD DEPT OBJPROJ" DATE : 12/14/93 PAGE : 21 WARRANT AMOUNT A211795 TURF TEC DISTRIBUTORS INC 4474 A211796 TWO RIVERS INVESTMENT 113212V A211797 UNION COLONY BANK 102693 103193 I11693 11293 1963 92893 A211798 UNITED BUILDING CENTERS 179I4 17918 A211799 UNITED STATES WELDING'INC 291 A211800 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICES 110♦ 1111 1118 1125 011061-6360+CC 13.20 13.20 =s=====zs==srs= 24-9044-6397-4715 75.00 77-5300-6379 77-S300-6210' 77-5310-6210 77-5310-6220 77-5300-6337 77 -5310 -6250 -PICT 77 -5310 -6250 -PICT 01-10 61 -6360 -CC 01 -1061"6360 -CC • 77-5300-6220: 77-5310-6225' 77-5310-6225 775310-6225 77-5300-6225 ' 75.00 11.09 ' 34.15 34.15 ' 19499 37.08 210.00 729.39 _-_-n- - 10075.85 ==3XgzS= 90.31 20.00 110.31 11.80 11.80 =========arr=s=' 31.52 30.39 29.63 29.26 WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS OF : ' 12/14/93 INVOICE NUMBER A211800 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICES A2I1801 US DEPT OF COMMERCE 377302 945529 9479I6 950766 A211802 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 313510415 A211803 VALDE2, ANDREW JR. A211804 VALLEY FIRE EXT 313510978 316 23 60 31 411293 461293 W165712UA 36128 A211805 VILLA AT GREELEY INC. 121393 DATE : 12/14/93 PAGE : 22 ACCOUNT NUMBER PD DEPT OBJ PROJ 77-5310-6250-PILT 77 -5310 -6250 -PICT 77-5310-6250-PILT 77-5310-6250—PILT 671192-6345-LD 67-1192-6345—LOCL' 67 -1192 -6345 —CO 67 -1192 -6345 —LOCI 671192-6345—LD 77-5300-6345' 77-5310-6345 77-530O6345 24-9544-6398-4715 01 -1061 -6360 —CC 01-2320-63500.DASP 01-2320-6350P1SP 0 12320-6350-PRLR 01-23206350—RTCD 01-2320-6350—RTCN 01-2320-6350—RTCT 0 12320-6350-TDNR WARRANT' AMOUNT' sp—r S e.e.M.mm•IMSIPINaN 111•••••101 120.80 ===z=s=z=zszs t 116.50 90.90 90.00 130.20 - ..... 427.60 sz=zxr=2=3=2S2i 2.04 44.16 25.24 43.18 534.56 184.54 184.55 61.69 1.097.96 =_z=ss =m= 52.00 —..------------- 50.00 =====s_s=s..s=== 17.20 —+--�....... 17.20 ss=s_=s 1,112.74 '3,192.50 2,757.76 7,612.83 ' 628.32 ♦9,016.96 6,623.00 WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT• REGIST2'Z AS OF 2'12/14/93.' INVOICE NUMBER 'ACCOUNT'NUMBER ' FD DEPT O8J PROJ DATE :'12/14/93 PAGE 2 23 'WARRANT' • AMOUNT' A211805 VILLA AT GREELEY INC. 121393 A21I806 VWR SCIENTIFIC A211807 W N GRAINGER INC 56719950 HANDLING 109-966795-6 A211808 WARD TRANSPORT, INC. 9015 9369 A211809 WARDEN, DONALD D 110893 121093 121393 121493 A211810 WAXMAN INDUSTRIAL NETWORK 194430 01-2320-6350-TDR' 01«2320-6350«TISP 01 -2320 -6350 -TROT 01=2320-6350-3/4 01-2320-6350-FDGT Oi-2320-6350-PARL 28,692.18 670:00 24,567.30 ' '178.88 8,093.80 1,774.31 '134,920.58 =s=s=s===t=t=s= 19-4170-6250-GWRL 75,84 75.84 01 -10616360 -CC 3.61 01 -1061 -6360 -CC 66.00 77-5310-6250-JETA 77-5310-6250-JETA 77-5310-6250-100L 79-1152-6143 79-2151-6143 79-1151-6143 79-1151-6143 69.61 ====ssssxtttsss 190.58 185.84 185.13 561.55 ==a= 5.00 49.95 274.00 10.00 -338.95 01-1123-6940 871.00 871.00 = ss=s WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT'REGISTE2 AS OF : 12/14/93 INVOICE NUMBER DATE : 12/14/93 PAGE : 24 ACCOUNT NUMBER 'WARRANT FD DEPT OBJ PROD AMOUNT A211811 WEINMEISTER,. CHERYL L REISSUE' 12993 ' A211812 WELD COUNTY REVOLVING CK7746 7741 A211813 WESTVIEW PRINTING • 19-4140-6599 19-4140-637000P' 19 -4140 -6370 -MCP 01-2420-6370 01-2990-6370' 35.00 ' 32.50 64.50 132.00 _r_r_r_==i=r_r_ 29.63 245.81 275,44 =======¢======= 109495 60-2160-6210 12,00 A211814 2 C M PUMP C EQUIPMENT 4849 77.5310-6362 12.00 =====¢=cai=i=rr' 35.00 ' 35.00 =tr==ct=zacirzs' FINAL TOTAL 416,030.88 =iz====_===s=rs WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS OF : 12/14/93. DATE 12/14/93 PAGE : 25 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT ALL ACCOUNTING AND BUDGETING PRODECURES HAVE BEEN COMPLETED ON THE ABOVE LISTED CLAIMS AS SHOWN ON PAGE 1 THROUGH 24 , AND DATED 12/14/93, AND THAT PAYMENTS SHOULD BE TO THE RESPECTIVE VENDORS IN THE E AMOUNTS SET OPPOSITTHEIR NAMES, WITH THE TOTAL AMOUNT fy14(hJ �j Q DATED THIS ISTM +� �..c-.lJ DAY 0 �..L �� 19 J3 • i tr tL DIREC 0 . I A'CfAND ADMINISTRATION SERVICES SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS T 1�! DAY pF oN,e1:_YYe..-Y 19 �� MY COMMISSION -EXPIRES: ` 1d$ CowaiSsjcfljJia �i NOTARY PUBLIC WE, THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, HEREBY (APPROVE) (DISAPPROVE) THE CLAIMS AS SET FORTH ABOVE; AND WARRANTS IN PAYMENT THEREFORE ARE HEREBY ORDERED DRAWN UPON THE _ l.. - FUND TOTAL ING DATED T 19 gym WELD COUNTY CLF/RK E _OAR- BOARD WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTEP AS OF : 12/14/9:1 INVOICE NUMBER ACCOUNT NUMBER PD DEPT 08J PROJ DATE - 12/14/93 PAGE : 1 WARRANT AMOUNT 5858224 MIKE'S HEATING S858225 SAM AINSWORTH C CO S858226 ATTENDING PHYSICIAN STMT S858227BAGLEY, DAVID L. MD 5858228 DONNER, E JEFFREY 5858229 FAMILY PHYSICIANS CLINIC S858230 FAMILY PHYS. OF WINDSOR 5858231 GREELEY ORTHOPEDIC ASSOC 12-44636710-EMER 12-4463-6710-EMER 12-4447-6710REG 124447-6710REG 12-4447-6710-REG 12-4447-6710REG 124447-6710-REG 12-4447-6710REG 12-444?-6710-REG 325.00 325.00 =============st 500.00 000rr 500.00 =====s=s====s== 10.75 24.36 35.11 ===========S3== 22.50 22.50 =:=s=s=xss=x=ss 22.50 -M-~ -22.50 =s=s =lase= s=xs 22.50 22.50 22.50 22.50 =s=s=s=s=s===x= 22.50 22.50 =s=s=seta=sat WAP2ODP WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS OF :1t2/14/9� INVOICE NUMBER a 5858232 ORTHOPAEDIC GTR/ROCKIES 5858233 PLAN DE SALUD DEL VALLE $858234 SUNRISE COMM HLTH CNTR 5858235 WELD MENTAL HEALTH CENTER 5858236 NORTH COLO MEDICAL CENTER 5858237 GREELEY MEDICAL CLINIC PC 5858238 AMER PUBLIC WELFARE ASSN 42180 ACCOUNT NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROJ DATE S 12/14/93 PAGE : 2 WARRANT' AMOUNT 12-4447-6710^REG 12-4447-6710-REG 1244476710-REG 12-4447-6710-REG 124447-6710REG 22,50 22.50 =2=SSZ3====2=== 22.50 22.50 =s=====_=====2= 22.50 22.50 22.50 22.50 ^ 45,00 ===========2=22 12-4447-6710^REG 17.21 17.21 __=====2====sss 12-4447-6710-REG 40.00 12-4447-6710REG 30.00 12-44476710-REG 45.00 12-4447-6710-REG - 40.00 12-4447-6710-REG 30.00 124447- 6710REG 30.00 12-4447- 6710-REG 40.00 255.00 ==v 12-4410-6330 75.00 12-4410-6311 5.00 WAPZOOP WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT'R£GISTE1 AS OF :'12/14/93 DATE : 12/14/93 PAGE : 3 INVOICE: ACCOUNT NUMBER 'WARRANT NUMBER' FD DEPT 08J PROJ' ' AMOUNT' 5858238 AMER PUBLIC WELFARE ASSN S858239 BOULDER COUNTY 5858240 BRATTON'S' S9318458 53358 53934 54084 54082 54083 54099 5858241 CHESHIRE COUNTY SHERIFF 5858242 CHILD ADVOC RES t ED INC 5858243 CORER PRINTING 5858244 DAY -TIMERS INC 22517 12-4411-6359 12-4410-6940 12.P.44106$210' 1244106210 12-4410-6210 12+4460-6210' 12-4410-6210' 12-4410-6210' 1244106210 12-4411-6210' 124410-6210 ----aa ... 80.00 =ssssaasas=sss= ' 16:20 -- ... 16.20 ======s=sasaar 485.63 24.44 42,44 478.56 11.44 20.50 162.50 64.53 3.81 7.00 1,300.85 as=s=ans=tan=s= 12-4411-6359 35.90 12-444 1 -6710 -CON T 12-4435-671'0-PRNT 35.90 ==s= ari= =ssssss 3,171.42 2,835.00 6,006.42 ==a: a 12-4410-6210 23.00 23.00 fl 12523608-001 12-4410-6210 34.95 WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS OF : 12/I4/93 INVOICE NUMBER' 5858244 DAY -TIMERS INC S858245 DEEP ROCK NORTH ACCOUNT NUMBER FD DEPT 08J PROJ DATE : 22/1.4/93 PAGE : 4 WARRANT AMOUNT 12523608-001 12-4410-6311 '6.45 5858246 GENETIC DESIGN, INC. 370971 370972 370973 S858247 FRIES COMMUNICATIONS 9158 5858248 GREELEY FLORAL LTD 5858249 IMMUNOLOGICAL ASSOC DENVER' 5858250 METPATH1 INC. 12-4410-6533 12-4411-6391 12-4411-6391 12-4411-6391' 41.40 ___====a=a==s=s 19.90 _y--__ --_-_� 19.90 sm=====z=m==sss 164.00 88.00 88.00 340.00 12-4410-62I0 382.80 382.80 12-4410-6210" 82.00 12-4411-63911 12-4411-6391 124411-6391 12'4411-6391 12-4411-6391 12-4411-6391 12-4411-6391' 12-4411-6391 82.00 184.00 275.00 ' 92.00 275.00 826.00 ===s=s===s===ss 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 WAP200P WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTE AS OF : 12/14/93 INVOICE NUMBER 5858250 METPATH, INC. 5858251 MUZAK BACKGROUND MUSIC 006564 5858252 NADA APPRAISAL GUIDES $858253 NORTH COLO MEDICAL CENTER DATE : 12/14/93' PAGE : 5 ACCOUNT NUMBER FD DEPT'OBJ PROJ 12-4411-6391 12-4411-6391 12-4411-6391 12-4411-6391 12-4411-6391 12-4411-6391 12-4411-6391 12-4411-6391 12-4411-6391 12-4411-6391 12-4411-6391 12-4411-6391 12-4411-6391 12-4411-6391 12-4411-6391 12-4411-6391 12-4411-6391 12-441I-6391 12-4411-6391" 12-4411-6391 12-4411-6391 12-4411-6391 12-4411-6391 12-4411-6391 12-4411-6391 12-4410-6533 12-4410-6330 12-4411-6391 ' WARRANT AMOUNT 10.00 10.00 10.00 10;00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 • 10.00 10.00 ' 10.00 10.00 10.00 290.00 ===xxs==s===sax 55.00 ----�� 55.00 =====x===s=sass 79.00 79.00 40.28 40.28 =========a^==a= WAP200P WELD COUNTY WARRANT'REGISTER AS OF 12/14/93 DATE : 12/14/93 PAGE 6 WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT NUMBER NUMBERFD DEPT 0SJ PROJ ' ' ' AMOUNT' $858 254 NORTH COLORADO PSYCMCARE S850255 PAPER CHASE 5858256 PARTNERS INC. 5858257 PDI LEGAL SERVICES 51692 5858258 POSTMASTER S858259 POSTMASTER 5858260 POSTMASTER S8S8261 SCHAEFER ENTERPRISES INC 7216 12-44416710-CONT 728.64 12-4410-6359 12-4410-6359 12-44106359 12 -4441 -6710 -CONY 12-4410-6359 I2-4410-6311 12-4410-6311- 1 2-44106 31 1 22-4410-6311 728.64 30.00 20.50 23.50 71.00 =============== '5,066.88 51066.88 ==3= ===3 25.00 25.00 ______ 698.57 698.57 ============== 7,000.00 7,000.00 77.50 77.50 32.30 WAP2OOP WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTE? AS OF 1 12/14/93 INVOICE NUMBER ACCOUNT NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROD DATE / 12/14/93 PAGE 1 7 5858261 SCHAEFER ENTERPRISES rmc 7252 5858262 THOMPSON, JEANNETTE S858263 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 2N1010671& 2N20099167 S858264 WELD COUNTY HUMAN RESOURC 5858265 WELD COUNTY SHERIFF'S 93-319-092312 93.-328..142430 S858266 WINDSOR BEACON 024862 S858267 WINONA'S SUB SWOP, INC 9688 S858268 DATA CONTROL SYSTEMS INC 15112 WARRANT AMOUNT 12-4410-6311 15.71 48.01 __=_=_========= 12-4410-6359 124411-6359 82.00 31`3.25 395.25 o=x=====z= 12-4410-631I' ' 1:4:16 ' 7.30 21i4d ---$. s3= 12-4410-6311' 12 -4433 -671'0 -WS ' " '186425 186.25 •293============ 12-4411-6359 12-4411-6359 12-4410-6359 12-44416370NR 12-4410-6210 8.50 8.50 17.00 =============== 7.42 ----^-7.42 s =sass=== = 59.50 59.50 1,244.25 WAPZOOP WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER MELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS OF : I2/14/93 INVOICE NUMBER ACCOUNT NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROD DATE : 12/14/93 PAGE : 8 WARRANT AMOUNT 5858268 DATA CONTROL SYSTEMS INC 1,244.25 =======X112===== FINAL TOTAL : 26,624.80 ___________=3r WAP2ODP WELD COUNTY WARRANT REGISTER AS OF - 12/14/93 DATE 12/14/93 PAGE : 9 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT ALL ACCOUNTING AND BUDGETING PRODECURES HAVE BEEN COMPLETED ON THE ABOVE LISTED CLAIMS AS SHOWN ON PAGE I THROUGH 8 s AND DATED 12/14/93, AND THAT PAYMENTS SHOULD 9E TO THE RESPECTIVE VENDORS 'IN /1THE AMOUNTS SET OPPOSITE THEIR NAMES, WITH(S THE .TOTAL AMOUNT ' S 2412 ` 6 O 1_ • DATED THIS — 7T}DA^��__.. , OF 9%��F��.�. 19 —La..G• DIRECTOR �� ANC AND ADMINISTRATION _�' `SERVICES SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS a" DAY OF r,v119. MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: • — '�missfi fl (k. e...'.... . • NOTARY PUBLIC WE, THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, "HEREBY (APPROVE) (DISAPPROVE) THE CLAIMS AS SET FORTH ABOVE: AND"WARRANTS IN PAYMENT THEREFORE ARE HEREBY ORDERED DRAWN UPON THE saa-ErsatoEFUND - TOTALI-02‘P T NG faQ `aa`:_e-sisfiLTO4_. 19-1-�//�1 . DATED HIS AY WELD COUNTY CLERK TO THE BOARD WWP451P SOCIAL SERVICES WARRANT REGISTER 12/14/93 PAGE 1 DAY CARE REPORT 18:10:49< DATE OF MAILING WARRANTS 12/15/93 FOR THE MONTH PAID DECEMBER 1993 ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT NUMBER I.0. PROVIDER NAME WARRANT AMOUNT 195386 575107 ABC CHID DEV CTR/JACKSON 195387 571785 ABC CHILD DEVCTR/CAMER3N 195388 575108 ABC -CHILD DEV CTR/MONFORT 195389 571786 ADC CHILD DEV CTR/SCOTT 195390 $71787 ABC CHILD DEV CTR/SHAWSNE 195391 582711 ADC CHILD DEV CTR/9TH AVE 1244376734 1244376734 1244376735 1244376735 1244376735 1244376735 1244376734 TOTAL 1244376734 1244376734 1244376735 1244376735 1244376735 1244376735 1244376734 TOTAL 1244376735 1244376735 TOTAL 1244376734 1244376735 1244376735 1244376735 TOTAL 1244376735 1244.376735 TOTAL 1244376735 1244376735 1244376735 TOTAL $203.28 $269.78 $2,216.96 $247.56 s2•003.40 1806.47 $614.01 $6.361.46 $147.84 155.44 $3,155.40 6974.12' $226.04 $164.64 $63.53 14,787.0I $679.38 $198.28 $877.66 $406•56 $991•52 $1,114.20 $328.16 :2.840.44 $11729.88 $415.96 $2':145.84 $85.84 $210.84 $1,169.88 $1,466.56 WWP4SIP SOCIAL SERVICES WARRANT REGISTER 12/14/93 PAGE 2 O A.Y CARE R EPORT OR T 18:10:49 DATE OF MAILING WARRANTS 12/15/93 FOR THE MONTH PAID DECEMBER 1993 WARRANT I.D. PROVIDER NAME NUMBER ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT AMOUNT 195392 346680 ABC CHILD DEVELOPMENT QTR 195393 577468 ABC LEARNING CENTER 195394 547058 ADAMS JANE 195395 578720 AICHELMAN♦ CECILIA 195396 $12995 ALVAREZ ANGELA 195397 567422 ANDERSON JILL 195398 513015 ARCHULETA JUANITA 195399 512884 ARELLANO REBECCA 195400 568353 ARMSTRONG♦'BECKY 195401 512859 BARRIENTES FLORA 224437'6734 1244376734 1244376734 1244376735 1244376735 1244376735 1244376733 1244376734 TOTAL' 1244376735 1244376735 1244376735 2244376734 1244376735 1244376734 1244376734 1244376734 TOTAL 12'44376734 1244376735 1244376735 1244376734 TOTAL 1244376734 "S1,291.88 $3,016.49 $3,378.48 $9,731.34 $3.977.65 $ I .214.36 $548.00 $228.60 $23,386.80 $643.00' $525.30 $349.99 $196.00 $460.30' $48.44 $77.05 $287.00 $364.05 $218.40" $461.00 $136.50 $729.35 S17545425 $199.50 WWP451P SOCIAL SERVICES WARRANT REGISTER 12/14/93 PAGE 3 DAV CARE REPORT 18:.10:49 DATE OF NAILING WARRANTS 12/15/93 FOR THE MONTH PAID DECEMBER 1993 WARRANT 1.D. PROVIDER NAME NUMBER ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT AMOUNT *************************r****************************** ******** 195402 512965 BASSETT BEVERLY 195403 549806 BECKSTED, FRAN 19540♦ S13010 BENNETT PEGGY' 195405 S90552 BERGMAN, JENNY 195406 565217 BOWLES DONNA 195407 512741- BOYER. JODI 195408 548393 BRANNER. MIRIAM 195409 512772 BREEDLOVE GAYLIN 195420 588621 BROWN THELMA 295411 549650 BUMGARNER, LYNN C. 195412 575515 CALKINS JANEEN 195413 512908 CANACHO PAULA 195414 S46757 CAMPUS CHILD CARE CENTER 1244376734 1244376735 1244376734 1244376735 1244376735 1'244376734 1244376735 1244376735 1244376735 1244376735 1244376735 TOTAL $112.00 *570.30 $96.25 $327.50 399.00 $119.70 $401.75 $333.60 5418.15 $408.84 3212.65 $621.49 1244376734 "$713.40 1244376734 $59.85 1244376734' 1244376734 1244376735 1244376735 TOTAL *300.00 5280.00' 1431.00" - S2s685.00` $2.696.00 WWP451P SOCIAL SERVICES WARRANT REGISTER 12/14/93 PAGE 4 DAY CARE REPORT 18:10:49 DATE OF MAILING WARRANTS12/15/93 FOR THE MONTH PAID DECEMBER 1993 WARRANT i.D• PROVIDER NAME NUMBER ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT AMOUNT *******************************************k*****************************k******** 195415 512966 CAPLINGER JANET 195416 513021 CAPRON, KRESTA 195417 S12967 CARILLO IDA 195418 512314 CARROLL, SHIRLEY 195419 512276 CASAU5, ANGELINA 195420 583028 CASH DEBORAH 195421 568519 COSI (CENTENNIAL`ELEM)' 1244376735 *204.10 1244376735 1244376734 TOTAL i244376735 1244376735 1244376734 1244376735 1244376735 1244376735 TOTAL 195422 568519 COSI (DOS RIOS1' 1244376735 195423 568520 CDSI (EAST MEMORIAL! 1244376735 I95424 584209 COSI (JEFFERSON) 1244376735 195425 564435 CENTENNIAL DEV-CENTER,IMC 1244376734 1244376734 1244376734.. 1244376734 1244376734 1244376735 1244376735 1244376735 1244376735 1244376735 1244376733 *416.00` *30.00 $446.00 *126.00 6154.00 $102.34 $300.98 *193.60 *347.00 *540.60 $823.00 $747.20 *401.60 8193.30 *704.00 $2,932.45 s352.00 *545.60 $10,217.10 *576.80' $11387620- $60 2400 $1,161.70 $455.00 WWP451P - SOCIAL SERVICES WARRANT REGISTER PAGE 5 DAY CARE % S P O R T DATE OF MAILING WARRANTS 12/15/93: ?OR THE WARRANT I.D. PROVIDER NAME NUMBER *******************************************4 195426 557966 CERETTO, GWEN 195427 545471 CHILDREN'S WORLD - LNGNT 195428 $65907 CHILDREN'S WORLD LRN CNTR 195429 $67364 COPLEY, JACQUELINE 195430 546766 COUNTRY VILLAGE CHI -DS CT R 195431 560349 CREATIVE YEARS CML'S CNTR 195432 512026 CROTEAUj CHRISTINE 12/14193. 16:10149 ROSTH'PAID'"DECEMBER '1993 ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT AMOUNT 1244376733 1244376734 TOTAL 1244376735 1244376734 TOTAL 1244376735 1244376735 1244376734-- 1244376734- 1244376735 1244376735 1244376735 1244376735 1244376734 TOTAL' 1244376735 1244376735 1244376734 1244376734 1244376734 1244376734 1244376735 1244376735 TOTAL 1244376735 1244376735 TOTAL 4396.00 42,736.60 422,259.75 '6572.00 $466.00 $1,038.00 $1,446.91 4453.20' 11,118.01' 42,312.11 45,389.84 $367.60' $917.12' 4367.96 $242.06 411,206.70 41,039.52 4263.00 4112.80 $234.00 4935.60 4172.80 6733.20' 4241.40 62,71.2.60 41,321.64. 4734.I4 62,055.78 1244376735 416.00 NWP4S1P SOCIAL SERVICES WARRANT REGISTER 12/14/93 PAGE 6 DAY" CARE REPORT 18410449 DATE OF MAILING WARRANTS 12/15/93 FOR THE MONTH PAID DECEMBER 1993 WARRANT I.D. PROVIDER NAME NUMBER ACCOUNT NUMBER *#*****************************************1**************it*** 195433 512561 CRUZ, RUBY 195434 587751 DALE MICHELE 195435 557280 DALTON, SHARON 195436 S81060 DAVIS DEB 195437 578582 DAYSPRING CHRISTIAN SCH.' 195438 SI2988 DEIDE4 RHONDA 195439 511384 DELACRUZ, VIRGINIA 195440 513027 DILKA, RENAE 195441 552359 DODGE KATHY 195442 547857 DOSCH, ANITA 195443 583147 DUVALL, DONNA 195444 S13033 EATON MICHELLE 195445 568096 EBERHARD, SHARON 1244376734 1244376734 1244376735 1244376735 1244376734 1244376735 1244376735 1244376734 TOTAL 1244376733 1244376734 1244376735 1244376734 1244376735 1244376735 1244376734 TOTAL 1244376734 1244376735 'WARRANT AMOUNT $132.30 $95.55 $421.00 $310.30 $682.00 $231.00 $58.50 $274.00 $1,245.50' 6167.40 $56.70 $109.58 $354.90 $430.00' $149.00 $533.00 $682.00 $206.15 $503.88 WWP451P SOCIAL SERVICES WARRANT REGISTER 12/14/93 PAGE 7 DAV CARE R E P O R T DATE OF MAILING WARRANTS 12/15/93 iR:10z39r, FOR THE MONTH PAID DECEMBER 1993 WARRANT I.D. NUMBER PROVIDER NAME ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT AMOUNT *******************************************k************************************** 195446 579697 EDMISTON, MELVA 195447 512802 EREBIA, ANNA 195448 513000 ESTES TERESA 195449 560202 FAITH CHRISTIAN PRESCHOOL 195450 $62517 FALCONBERG KAREN 195451 $5704I FLECK, LORETTA 195452 S71713 FORT LUPTON SCH. DIST 195453 553998 FOSTER, BERNADETTE 195454 558855 FRESHOUR, TRACY L 195455 513005 FRIAS MARGIE 195456 $58887 FRIEBUS, DOROTHY M 195457 557525 FRITZ,MABLE RE 8 124437673S 1244376733 TOTAL 1244376735 1244376735 1244376735 1244376735 TOTAL $572.40 *282.60 sas5.o0 6523.60 336.52 $258,25 8378.50 :636.75 1244376735 $138.00 1244376735 *182,00 1244376735 1244376734 1244376734 1244376735 1244376735 TOTAL 1244376735 1244376735 1244376735 1244376735 1244376735 83,999.00• $646.00 $646.00'... $1,168.00 8735.00 371194.00 8187.00 1587.12 *90.00 *1,202.00 3445000 WWP451P SOCIAL SERVICES WARRANT REGISTER 12/14/93 PAGE 8 DAY C A'R E 2'E P O R T 16:10:49 DATE OF MAILING WARRANTS 12/15/93- FOR THE MONTH PAID DECEMBER 1993 WARRANT I.D. NUMBER PROVIDER NAME ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT AMOUNT *******************************************I****t*********f *** **********t******** 195458 S84260 GALVIN, KAREN 195459 511477 GARCIA, JUANITA 195460 513020 GARCIA, LINDA 195461 512178 GARCIA, MADELINE' 195462 582700 GEESAMAN, SANDY 195463 548990 GIBSON, BETTY 195464 S79061' GIFFORD. JOANN 195465 547191' GLORIA CHRISTY'LUTHERN 195466 549078' GOBLE, HELEN 195467 559080 GODINE2, DIANA 195468 512768 GOMEZ MARY 195469 S12971 GONZALES HENRIETTA• 1244376734 1244376734 TOTAL 1244376735 1244376735 1244376735 1244376735 1244376735 1244376734 1244376735 1244376735 1244376735 TOTAL '1244376734 1244376734 1244376735 TOTAL 1244376734 1244376734 *798.00 $446475 B1'7244.75 4501.75 *252.70 *316.56 *453.30 *620.50 $202.96 $419.00' $409.00 B295.30- 6704,30 *156.03 *540.00 *73.54 1769.57 *36.65 $903.00 WWP4SIP socrAL seances WARRANT REGISTER 12/14/93 PAGE 9 DAY C A R E REPORT 18:10149` DATE OF MAILING WARRANTS 12/15/93 FOR THE MONTH'"PATTI DECEMBER 1993 WARRANT NUMBER I.D. PROVIDER NAME 195470 512936 GONZALES MARIA I95471 512208 GONZALES) JESSIE 195472 563075 GONZALES) LAURA 195473 512866 GONZALEZ FRANK 195474 $67238 GREEN) TRENA 195475 579180 GREIFE, BONNIE 195476 $12926 GUTIERREZ JOSE 195477 512870 GUTIERREZ) LAURA 195478 570037 HAUSE. -LORI 195479 513008 HEIMBUCH'CONNIE 195480 $12038 HEINZ, CRYSTAL 195481 512726 HERRERA) MARIE 195482 547210 HIGHLAND DAY CARE CENTER ACCOUNT NUMBER 1244376734 I244376735 1244376735 1244376735 1244376735 1244376735 1244376734 1244376735 1244376735 1244376735 1244376735 1244376735 1244376735 1244376735 1244376735 1244376735 1244376733 TOTAL WARRANT AMOUNT $69.30 $317.70 $327.60 "$1'02.80' 3354.48 $466.30 $21.70 478.40 . $420.00 $98.25 '$80.06 $70.35 $1,829.20 $8.80 4131'.00 685.80- $112.50- 1129167.40 WWP451P SOCIAL SERVICES WARRANTREGISTER12/14/93 PAGE 10 DAY CARE REPORT 18:10:49 DATE OF MAILING WARRANTS 12/15/93 FOR THE NONTH PAID DECEMBER 1993 WARRANT I.D. PROVIDER NAME NUMBER ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT AMOUNT 195483 512945 HILL, MEARLYN 195484 $62362 HIRSCH DOLLY 195485 571242 HUSTON SHERRIE 195486 513016 HYDE LORI 195487 583488 JAKEL, DEBBIE 195488 S53654 JEANNOUTOT, JANICE 195489 547877 JEWETT, WILMA 195490 $69892 JOHNSON, JANICE 195491 575411 JORDAN, DEBBIE I95492 512690. KASPAR, SHERRI 195493 512911 KEEFER KEVIN 195494 513014 KELLY FRANKIANN 195495 S12446 KELLY, SHIRLEY 195496 579552 KESSLER, DOROTHY ' 1244376735 1244376735 1244376735 1244376735 1244376735 1244376735 1244376735 1244376735 1244376734 1244376735 TOTAL 1244376735 1244376734 1244376734 1244376735 1244376734 1244316735 1244376735 TOTAL *87.00 $410.44 $386.00 $172.10'. $243.52 *845.30 *447.40 $374.50 $300.30 $617.38 3917.68 1187.10 $276.60 1117.74 $286.90 *82.56 $203.58 $206.50. $492.64 WYP451P SOCIAL SERVICES KARI ANT REGISTER 12/14/93` PAGE 11 DAY CARE I EPORT DATE OF MAILING WARRANTS 12/I5/93 ER:19:39 FOR THE MONTH PAID DECEMBER' WARRANT I, D. PROVIDER NAME NUMBER 195497 547217 KIDDIELAND 195498 560472 KILBER JACKIE 195499 555932 KINDER CARE 195500 549685 KLAUSNER, LAN 195501 565437 KORLASKE, LINDA 195502 $12967 KRAUSE BRANDI 195503 547297 LA PETITE ACADEMY 195504 51I831 LACOSSE, MARY *** *4 ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT AMOUNT 1244376734 1244376735 1244376735 1244376735 1244376734 TOTAL $405.90 $2,354.45 6835.55 1154.00 *323.70 $4,073.60 1244376735 8270.00 1244376734 1244376735 1244376734 1244376734 1244376734 1244376735 1244316735 1244376734 TOTAL I244376735 1244376735 1244376735 1244376734 1244376734 1244376734 124'4376134 1244376735 1244376735 1244376735 1244376734 TOTAL $177.94` $886.60" _`$396.88 $836.40 8360.80 $3{673.40 $2,058.60 $527. 18 S87919.50 S406075 '.$143 • 50 6132.20 $360.80 63,146.18 $1,139.60' $721.60 690 2.40 $294.60 $698.20' 51,209.20 $8,472.58" 1244376134 6144.90 WW12/14/93 PAGE 12 P4SIP SOCIAL SERVICES MARlANT REGISTER 12/14:99 DAY CARE R E R E P O R T FOR THE MONTH PAID DECEMBER 1993 DATE OF MAILING WARRANTS 12/15/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT WARRANT MI.D. PROVIDER NAME _ 'AMOUNT' ' NUMBER - 195505 581961 LADD, TAMMY 195506 $67145 LAMBERT, DESRA 195507 S53634 LANGE, DIANA 195508 575601 LARSEN, CARLA 195509 S79703 LARSON, JEANNE 195510 582838 LAY KATHERINE 195511 513017 LEDESMA, ODILIA 195512 $85221' LEDFORD AMY 195513 576716 LEE, SHEILA 195514 513006 LINCH SHARON 195515 $11958 LORAN. ELSIE 195516 512977 LOPEZ LEANNA 1244376735 1244376735 1244376735 TOTAL 1244376735 1244376735 1244376735 1244376734 TOTAL 1244376735 1244376735 1244376735 1244376735 1244376735 1244376735 1244376735 1244376735 TOTAL 1244376735 1244376735 1244376735 $242.00 *I52.50 6495.50 $890.00 1312.00' $195.00 *295.08 8354.46 $649.54- '4452,00 $365.00 $193.20 $333.00 $131.40 - B496.85- ' *281.65 si06.00 *1,015.90 $185.25 $25.40 $47.30 NNP4SIP SOCIAL SERVICES WARRANT REGISTER. 12/14/93 PAGE 13 DAY CARE R`E P O R T 18:10:49 DATE OF MAILING WARRANTS 12/15/93 FOR YPIE MONTH PAID DECEMBER 1993 WARRANT NUMBER I.0. PROVIDER NAME ACCOUNT NUMBER 195517 S12968 LOPEZ ROSE 195518 S91035 LOPEZ, LEANNA 195519 582710 MANY BLESSINGS CHILD CARE 195520 S12938 MARES RENEE 195521 S81471 MARSHALLI BRENDA 195522 551058 MARTIN DEBORAH 195523 $76051 MARTINI JANE 195524 559446 MCMILLAN, MARIA 195525 546712 MENDENHALL ROSEANN 195526 577946 MERRIFIELD,PATTY 195527 586091 MILLER KIMBERLY' 195528 511358 MILLS, CARMEN 1244376735 1244376135 1244376734 1244376734 1244376735 1244376735 1244376735 1244376733 TOTAL 1244'376735 1244376735 1244376734 1244376735 TOTAL 1244376735 1244376735' 1244376735 1244376734 1244376734 1244376734' 1244376735 * * * * WARRANT AMOUNT ********' *277.00' $50.05 1593.05 1736.12 *1,600.23 $354.06 *614.12 1316.50 $4.214.08 -f135.00 $550.08 .$151.36 1333.84 $1,035.28 $620.20 *742.60 *242.50 (286.65 *245.70 $300.30 $303.00. WWP451P SOCIAL SERVICES WARRANT REGISTER 12/14/93 PAGE 14 DAY C'A R E REPORT 18:10:49 DATE OF MAILING WARRANTS 12/15/93 FOR THE MONTH PAID DECEMBER 1993 WARRANT NUMBER 1.D• PROVIDER NAME ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT AMOUNT *************************************************i******************************** 195529 $12957 MONTANO ISABEL' 195530 581737 MONTESSORI EARLY LE *Ruin G 195531 545867 MOORE, JANETTE 195532 577853 NORADO, LORI 195533 512990 MORRIS KATHLEEN 195534 S12769 MUNOZ CARMEN 195535 512959 MURRAY. WANDA 195536 $48014 NUSIL, GEORGIA 195537 546614 MY FRIENDS $ ME LEARN' W; 195538 $82817 MY FRIENDS AND ME TOO 195539 S13003 0 CLAIR KAREN 195540 511916 OLIVAS, LINDA 1244376735 1244376734 1244376735 1244376735 1244376735 1244376734 1244376735 1244376735 1244376734 TOTAL 1244376735 1244376735 1244376735 1244376735 1244376733 TOTAL 22 44376735 1244376735 1244376735 S128.00 8657.90 $722.28 $270.00 $98.80 $140.00 $94.30` $446.30 825.00' *472.30 85,203.75 82.190.80 81.884.52 8265.00 8712.97 810.257.04 $839.40 8142.00 $304.90 WWP451P SOCIAL. SERVICES NARY ANT REGISTER 12/14/93 PAGE 15 DAY CARE REPORT 18:10:49 DATE OF MAILING WARRANTS 12/15/93 FOR THE MONTH PAID DECEMBER 1993 WARRANT I.D. PROVIDER NAME NUMBER 195541 512960 OLIVO, LYDIA 195542 $12198 ORONA, TRESIA 195543 584141 PARENT, DEANNA 195544 562738 PECKINPAUGH,'DONNA 195545 558235 PENCIL FENCE PRESCHOOL 195546 512608 PETASCHNICK, LISA 195547 577341 PRATHER, NICKI 195548 S82045 PRATT, LETA 195549 564037 PRESBYTERIAN CHLDRN'S CTR 195550 512892 PULIDO, ARTURO 195551 566423 RANDALL, DIXIE ACCOUNT NUMBER 1244376735 1244376733 1244376735 1244376735 1244376735 TOTAL 1244376734 1244376735 1244376735 1244376735 1244376735 1244376734 TOTAL WARRANT AMOUNT $73.05 $142.00 121I.00 $602.00 1360.73 *962.75 11.222.20 11,223.10 6576.00 61`2233.00 1558.40 3453.30 15,266.00 1244376735 1134.00 1244376734 1244376734 TOTAL 1244376735 1244376734 1244376735 1244376735 6109.20 " *96.00 *205.20 6152.00 $693.00 678.55..' 1216.00 WNP451P SOCIAL SERVICES WARRANT REGISTER 12/14/93 PAGE 16 DAY CARE 2'E P O R T 18:10:49'; DATE OF MAILING WARRANTS 12/15/93 FOP THE MONTH PAID DECEMBER 1'993 WARRANT NUMBER I.D. PROVIDER NAME ******************************************* I95552 56607` REEVES, SHIRLEY 195553 546660 REIL,MARCIA 195554 584791 RICHARDSON, TONYA 195555 548756 RICKARD. BETTY J 195556 580387 RIOS ALMA 195557 580580 RIOS MARIA 195558 512893 RITCHIE. DOLLIE 195559 513028 ROCHA. CLAUDIA 195560 S12607 ROCHE, LYNN 195561 511893 RODNAN, CHARLOTTE 195562 512605 RODRIGUEZ LISA 195563 512754 RODRIGUEZ. GRACIELA ACCOUNT NUMBER 1244376734 1244376735 1244376735 TOTAL'' WARRANT ****k* - ****** $4xz.so 1204.75 1132.00 $749.25 1244376735 *752.66 1244376735 $224.66 1244376734" ' 1244376734- 1244376735 TOTAL 1244376735 1244376735 TOTAL' 1244376734 1244376735 1244376735 1244376735 1244376734 1244376735 1244376735 $496.'00- -$528.00 1279.30 *1,303.30' $171.30 $6.88 $178.18 *117.62 *260.05 $230.60 $106.30 $94.50 *152.80 $146.80 NWP451P SOCIAL SERVICESWARfANT REGISTER 12/14/93 PAGE 17 DAY CARE 1 E P O R T 18:10:49 DATE OF MAILING WARRANTS 12/15/93 FOR THE MONTH PAID DECEMBER- 1993 WARRANT Tat. PROVIDER NAME NUMBER ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT AMOUNT *****************************************************************tit**************'' 195564 513024 RODRIGUEZ, MARTINA 195565 513035 RODRIGUEZ, MARY 195566 576456 ROYBAL• REGINA 195567 567570 RUFF, CONNIE 195568 512822 RUIZ JUANA 195569 513025 SAGERT BET'S ANN 195570 512845 SALAZAR, KERRI 195571 513013 SALZMAN MARILYN 195572 511127 SANCHEZ, ANGELICA 195573 579500 SCMAFER,'RONNIE 195574 $68475 SCHRECONGOST, DEE 195575 511795 SCHUMAN, KAREN 195576 580058 SEAMAN, WENDY 1244376735 1244376734 1244376735 1244376734 1244376735 1244376735 TOTAL 1244376735 1244376735 1244376735 1244376735 1244376734 1244376734 1244376735 1244376735 TOTAL 1244376734 1244376735 1244376735 392.24 $466•50 5295.08 $850.30 $776.60 $156.08 $2,078.06 4740.00 $116.00 $196.00 $6.40' $47.20 $210.00 $295.30 $217.20 $512.50 $425.00 $140.00 $688.72 WWP451P SOCIAL SERVICES WARRANT REGISTER 12/14/93. PAGE 18 DAY CARE REPORT 18:10:49 GATE OF MAILING WARRANTS 12/15/93 FOR THE MONTH PAID DECEMBER 1993 WARRANT I.D. PROVIDER NAME ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT AMOUNT NUMBER 195577 512766 SHAFFER* RUBY 195578 511621 SMALL* LINDA 195579' 565536 SMITH, DARINDAfRINDYI 195580 57I769 SPRINGER, NANCY 195561 $46734 STARLINE PRESCHOOL 195582 512473 STAUFFER* BARBARA 195583 $12950 STEC, BRENDA 195584 581884 STEEL, SHARON 195585 55966♦ STIDHAM,' NORMA 195586 513018 STOLTZ• CHRISTINA 195587 590023 STONE, PAM 195588 585586 SUICHTA LORI 195589 $47815 SUNSHINE SCHOOL 1244376735 1244376734 1244376135 TOTAL 1244376734 1244376735 TOTAL 1244376735 1244376735 1244376735 1244376735 1244376735 1244376735 1244376735 TOTAL 1244376735 1244376735 1244376734 1244376735 $274.80 $160.80 $276.70 $437.50 $286.65 $254.16 $540.81 $300.08 $741.15 6114.80 $377.20 $1,039.60 $542.00 $456.00 $998.00' $255.34 $421.00 $215.35 $184.66 PAGE51P SOCIAL SERVICES WARRANT REGISTER 12/14/93 18:10:49 PAGE 19 DAY CARE REPORT DATE OF MAILING WARRANTS 12/15/93 FOR THE MONTH PAID DECEMBER 1993 WARRANT NUMBER I.D• PROVIDER NAME 195590 $49209 SWEET, LINDA 195591 512984 SWOPE KENNETH 195592 582307 SYDOW, LAURENE 195593 583785 TAPIA YVETTE 195594 S56651 TAYLOR, PAMELA 195595 558824 TERRIER£, MICHELE 195596 512962 THADEN, KAREN 195597 557469 THE COTTAGE 195598 583445 THORNE, CANDICE 195599 581481 TURNER SANDII 195600 571523 VAN ORIEL KAREN 195601 570484 VAN ROEKEL, MARCELLA 195602 513029 VANDYNE SHIRLEY *k ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT AMOUNT 1244376735 1244376734 1244376734 1244376734 1244376734 1244376734 TOTAL ****** $264.00' $164.30- $375064 $19.'38 $6.88 $356.80 $383.06. 1244376735 $776.44 1244376735 1244376735 1244376735 1244376735 1244376735 TOTAL. 1244376735 1244376735 1244376735 1244376735 $956.25 -493.00 '$243.60 6480.80 6165.00' $645.80 $921.12 $151.36 $466.00 $146.30 WWP4SIP SOCIAL SERVICES WARRANT REGISTER 12/14/93 PAGE 20 DAY CARE REPORT 18:10:49' DATE OF MAILING WARRANTS 12/15/93 FOR THE MONTH PAID DECEMBER 1993 WARRANT I.D. PROVIDER NAME ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT NUMBER .. _ ... AMOUNT ,.. 195603 S12703 VARGAS ROSE MARY 1244376735 690.00 195604 S12979 WALKER CAROL 1244376735 $135.00 195605 550826 WARD, TERESA 1244376735 6150.00 195606 584411 WASSENBERG-CONNIE 1244316135 $446.25 195607 S13043 WEAVER, KELLY 1244376735 6268.00 195608 512778 WEBER BURTON 1244376735 - $178.00 195609 S12930 WEITZEL FRANCES 1244376734 $126.40 195610 512341 WELCH, TAMMY 1244376735 $512.10 195611 S78716 WHITE, ELLEN 1244376735 $131.00 195612 $62932 WHITE, SHARON 1244376735 - $1,735.76 195613 S13026 WINSLOW, JANICE 1244376735 $489.24 195614 S49775 WOELK,DEE ANN 1244376735 $411.25 195625 590409 YBARRA VICKY 195616 512522 ZAMORA, CECLIA 1244376734 1244376735 TOTAL $163.80 $496.85 $660.65 1244376735 $110.50 WWP4S1P SOCIAL SERVICES WARRANT REGISTER 12/14/93 PAGE 21 DAY CARE REPORT 16:10:49 DATE OF NAILING WARRANTS 12/15/93 FOR THE NORTH PAID DECEMBER 1993 WARRANT NUMBER I.D. PROVIDER NAME 195617 512907 ZIEGLER BETTY ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT AMOUNT 1244376734 •319.60 WWP4SIP SOCIAL SERVICES WARRANT REGISTER 12/14/93 PAGE 22 DAY CARE EPORTT 18:10:49 DATE OF MAILING WARRANTS 12/15/93 FOR THE MONTH PAID DECEMBER 1993 WARRANT I.D. PROVIDER NAME NUMBER **** ** ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT AMOUNT' **************************************** NUMBER OF WARRANTS = 232 TOTAL = $226,736.53 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT ALL ACCOUNTING AND BUDGETING PROCEDURES HAVE BEEN COMPLETED ON THE ABOVE LISTED'CLAIMS AS SHOWN ON PAGE 1' THROUGH ,21 ♦ AND DATED 12/14/93, AND THAT PAYMENTS SHOULC BE TO THE RESPCCTIU VENDORS IN TIC AMOUNTS SET OPPOSITE THEIR NAMES, WITH 'THE TOTAL"AMOUNT DATED THIS aCx-vC3)'Fv ,.. 19 91_. 1.01 szi 3j0S3. DIRECTOR OP't tNANCE AND ADMINI T' ION SERVICES SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS _� ____ DAY OF QE t2?JEZ. I9 3_. MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: '8144"4 0NEJ(PfR I��JLtLINt____. A NOTARY'PUBLIC WE, THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Or WELD COUNTY; COLORADO; HEREBY (APPROVE) (DISAPPROVE) THE CLAIMS'AS SET FORTH ABOVE; AND WARRANTS IN PAYMENT THEREFORE ARE HEREBY ORDERED DRAIn UPON THE �' 1"_y5ne5FUND - TOTALING' 3i t3 DATED THIS DAY,OF Lae.LtS ' 19_` 3 . TO THE BOARD EPUTY MEMBER MEMBER CHAIRMAN CL ;n;, "TO T h' 4 CASE NCMBZE RE -1567 ZPMH-1884 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES Cases Approved by Administrative Review 12/3/93 through 12/10/93 ',TAME Arnold Hart Chuck unlif£e, Director RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS MINUTES BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO DECEMBER 15, 1993 TAPE #93-46 The Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, met in regular session in full conformity with the law and bylaws of said Board at the regular place of meeting in the Weld County Centennial Center, Greeley, Colorado. December 15. 1993, at the hour of 9:00 A.M. ROLL CALL: MINUTES: The meeting was called to order by the Chairman and on roll call the following members were present, constituting a quorum of the members thereof: Commissioner Constance L. Harbert, Chairman Commissioner W. H. Webster, Pro-Tem Commissioner George E. Baxter Commissioner Dale K. Hall Commissioner Barbara J. Kirkmeyer Also present: Weld County Attorney, Bruce T. Barker Acting Clerk to the Board, Carol Harding Finance and Administration Director, Don Warden Commissioner Kirkmeyer moved to approve the minutes of the Board of County Commissioners meeting of December 13. 1993. as printed. Commissioner Baxter seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. ADDITIONS: There were no additions to today's agenda. CONSENT AGENDA: Commissioner Webster moved to approve the consent agenda as printed. Commissioner Kirkmeyer seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. PRESENTATIONS: CopeGwasIONoOFt presentES - TOM to receive hisAawardPUBLIC fivvee yearsTom Coof service on the Board of Public Health. RECOGNITION OF SERVICES - MARY MAST, EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES ADVISORY COUNCIL: Mary Mast was not present to receive her award for one year of service on the Emergency Medical Services Advisory Council. RECOGNITION OF SERVICES - NOMIE KETTERLING, JUVENILE COMMUNITY REVIEW BOARD: Nomie Ketterling was not present to receive her award for six years of service on the Juvenile Community Review Board. RECOGNITION OF SERVICES - CAROLYN OLSON, JUVENILE COMMUNITY REVIEW BOARD: Carolyn, Olson was not present to receive her award for six years of service on the Juvenile Community Review Board. PUBLIC INPUT: There was no public input. WARRANTS: Don Warden, Director of Finance and Administration, presented the following warrants for approval by the Board: General Fund $ 635,745.07 Commissioner Webster moved to approve the warrants as presented by Mr. Warden. Commissioner Kirkmeyer seconded the motion, which carried unanimously. BIDS: BUSINESS: NEW: PRESENT HAWORTH SYSTEMS FURNITURE AND SHELVING BID - SOCIAL SERVICES: Mr. Warden read the names of three vendors who submitted bids for furniture and shelving. Said bid will be considered for approval on December 29, 1993. PRESENT MILK BID - SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT: Mr. Warden read the names of three vendors who submitted bids for milk for the Sheriff's Department. Said bid will be considered for approval on December 29, 1993. CONSIDER JOB TRAINING PLAN MODIFICATION BETWEEN COLORADO GOVERNOR'S JOB TRAINING OFFICE AND EMPLOYMENT SERVICES AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN: Walt Speckman, Director of Human Resources, explained the purpose of said modification is to adjust budget amounts, as well as participant planning forms for the Title II -A and Title II -C programs. Commissioner Webster moved to approve said modification and authorize the Chairman to sign. Seconded by Commissioner Kirkmeyer, the motion carried unanimously. CONSIDER RESOLUTION RE: ESTABLISH RESERVES IN FISCAL YEAR 1993 IN COMPLIANCE WITH AMENDMENT ONE (TABOR): Mr. Warden explained his strategy for establishing reserves within various County funds to maintain an even funding level without the reserves being included in the spending limitations of Amendment One. He said there is $1,580,219 reserved in the Social Services Fund and $700,000 in the Road and Bridge Fund. Commissioner Hall moved to approve said reserve. Seconded by Commissioner Baxter, the motion carried unanimously. CONSIDER RESOLUTION RE: ESTABLISH EMERGENCY RESERVE IN FISCAL YEAR 1993 IN COMPLIANCE WITH AMENDMENT ONE (TABOR): Mr. Warden stated the amount required by Amendment One as an emergency reserve is $1,200,000, which is an increase of $400,000 over the amount for 1992. Commissioner Baxter moved to approve said reserve. Seconded by Commissioner Webster, the motion carried unanimously. CONSIDER RESOLUTION RE: SETTING THE AMOUNT OF COMPENSATION FOR ELECTION JUDGES AND BRANCH REGISTRARS: Mr. Warden explained said draft resolution is in compliance with direction to staff during the 1994 budget hearing process. It sets the amount of compensation for election judges at $60.00 per election and for registrars at $5.00 per hour. Commissioner Kirkmeyer moved to approve said draft. Seconded by Commissioner Hall, the motion carried unanimously. Let the record reflect that Tom Cope is present at this time and Chairman Harbert presented him with the award to recognize his service on the Board of Public Health. Minutes - December 15, 1993 Page 2 PLANNING: CONSIDER RESOLUTION RE: VIOLATIONS OF THE BUILDING CODE ORDINANCE - SNYDER OIL CORPORATION: Commissioner Kirkmeyer moved to approve said resolution authorizing the County Attorney to proceed with legal action against Snyder Oil Corporation for violations of the Weld County Building Code Ordinance. Commissioner Hall seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. CONSIDER SITE APPLICATION FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO EXISTING WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY - TOWN OF WINDSOR: Greg Thompson. Department of Planning Services, read the favorable recommendation of staff and the Planning Commission into the record. Dennis Wagner, Director of Public Works for the Town of Windsor, was present. He explained the request is for improvements to the existing plant, which is an area lagoon system requiring modification due to growth of the town, as well as more stringent environmental standards. There was no public input offered. Commissioner Kirkmeyer moved to approve said site application. Seconded by Commissioner Hall, the motion carried unanimously. CONSIDER RE #1561 - RIDER: Mr. Thompson reviewed the recommendation of staff and explained the property does abut the City of Longmont. He said there are approximately ten accesses between Weld County Roads 1 and 3. and approval of said exemption will add one additional access. Mr. Thompson pointed out proposed Condition of Approval #4, which is in response to the City of Longmont's request for a 60 -foot reservation for right-of-way east of the section line on Weld County Road 1. In response to a question from Commissioner Hall, Mr. Thompson explained the effect of RE #531, which was approved in 1982 and created a one -acre buildable parcel south of Weld County Road 26. As clarification for Commissioner Kirkmeyer, Mr. Thompson stated the request does not create three buildable lots, even though Weld County Road 26 splits the property in half. Bruce Barker, County Attorney, explained the difference is in the manner of conveyance; it all depends upon whether the easement was conveyed as "fee simple", an easement, or right-of-way. James Rider, applicant, explained he is the fourth generation to live on this parcel and approval of the request will allow him to construct a home. He clarified that the access to be used is already an existing farm access; and RE #531 was obtained by his father, although it has not been used. In response to Commissioner Hall's question regarding the configuration of Lot A. Mr. Rider stated it is because of the location of the field access road, as well as the property sloping to the west at that point. He plans for his home to sit on the crest of that slope. After discussion with Commissioners Kirkmeyer and Webster concerning the configuration of Lot A, Mr. Rider agreed it could be enlarged, reconfigured, and attached to the south and east property lines in some manner. Chairman Harbert mentioned that if Lot A is changed in size, proposed Condition of Approval A5C will need to be amended to reflect the proper size of proposed Lot B. In response to Commissioner Kirkmeyer, Mr. Barker discussed the 60 -foot reservation for right-of-way as requested by the City of Longmont. He clarified for Mr. Rider this is just a reservation for right-of-way, it does not give the City of Longmont the right-of-way. If the City needs the right-of- way in the future, it wil have to negotiate with the owners for purchase at that time. There was no public testimony offered concerning this matter. Commissioner Kirkmeyer moved to approve RE 01561, with a change in wording for proposed Conditions of Approval #4, 05A, and 05C as stated by Mr. Barker. Seconded by Commissioner Hall, the motion carried unanimously. Minutes - December 15, 1993 Page 3 RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES: ATTEST: The Resolutions consent agenda. Let the minutes were attested to to the Board. There being no further business, this meeting was adjourned at 9:50 A.M. were presented and signed as listed on the There were no Ordinances. Weld County Clerk to the Board By: Deputy Clerk to the Board reflect that the above and foregoing actions and respectfully submitted by the Acting Clerk APPROVED: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Constance L Harbert, Chairman Minutes - December 15, 1993 Page 4 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS ROLL CALL: MINUTES: WARRANTS: ATTEST: MINUTES BOARD OF SOCIAL SERVICES WELD COUNTY, COLORADO DECEMBER 15, 1993 TAPE #93-46 The Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, met in regular session as the Board of Social Services in full conformity with the law and bylaws of said Board at the regular place of meeting in the Weld County Centennial Center, Greeley, Colorado, December 15, 1993, at the hour of 9:00 A.M. The meeting was called to order by the Chairman and on roll call the following members were present, constituting a quorum of the members thereof: Commissioner Constance L. Harbert, Chairman Commissioner W. H. Webster, Pro-Tem Commissioner George E. Baxter Commissioner Dale K. Fall Commissioner Barbara J. Kirkmeyer Also present: Weld County Attorney, Bruce T. Barker Acting Clerk to the Board, Carol Harding Commissioner Baxter moved to approve the minutes of the Board of Social Services meeting of December 13, 1993, as printed. Commissioner Hall seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. Carol Harding, Finance and Administration, presented the warrants for approval by the Board in the amount of $259,159.15. Commissioner Hall moved to approve the warrants as presented by Ms. Harding, Commissioner Kirkmeyer seconded the motion, which carried unanimously. Let the minutes reflect that the above and foregoing actions were attested to and respectfully submitted by the Acting Clerk to the Board. There being no further business, this meeting was adjourned at 9:55 A.M. Weld County Clerk to the Board By: Deputy Clerk to the Board APPROVED: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Constance L. Harbert, Chairman A Barbara J. Kirkmeyer Hello