HomeMy WebLinkAbout941604.tiff HEARING CERTIFICATION
RE: VIOLATIONS OF THE WELD COUNTY BUILDING CODE AND ZONING
ORDINANCES
A public hearing was conducted on November 8, 1994, at 10:00 a.m., with the following
present:
Commissioner W. H. Webster, Chairman
Commissioner Dale K. Hall, Pro-Tern
Commissioner George E. Baxter
Commissioner Constance L. Harbert
Commissioner Barbara J. Kirkmeyer
Also present:
Acting Clerk to the Board, Lin Dodge
County Attorney, Bruce Barker
Planning Department representative, Barry Kramer
Planning Department representative, Ed Stoner
The following business was transacted:
I hereby certify that a public hearing was conducted to consider whether to authorize the
County Attorney to proceed with legal action against the individuals named for violations
of the Weld County Building Code and Zoning Ordinances. Cases were heard as follows.
VI #2040 - Craig and Noreen McConnell: Barry Kramer, Department of Planning
Services, presented the case report for the record, indicating the bed and breakfast
operating on the property is a violation of Sections 31.2 and 31.3 of the Weld County
Zoning Ordinance. To correct the violations, the property owners must apply for, and have
approved, a Special Review Permit. They also must meet all conditions of said permit or
cease the commercial operation on the property. In response to Commissioner Harbert,
Ed Stoner, Department of Planning Services, stated that the initial building permit was for
a single family dwelling with five bedrooms; the property owners did not indicate an intent
to operate a bed and breakfast. He indicated the property owners were notified in early
correspondence regarding operating a bed and breakfast in an Agricultural Zone, with the
first violation letter being dated March 9, 1994. Craig McConnell, property owner, was
present and stated the initial construction was for a home, but as the project progressed,
they saw a need and checked the potential for a bed and breakfast. He said he had
received the Special Use Permit application, but set it aside after reviewing the
requirements and deciding the permit was not applicable since 95% of their business was
feeding and raising elk and they had no surrounding property owners within 500 feet of their
property. He asked the Board if a mutually acceptable alternative to the Special Use Permit
could be worked out, especially since their property was in such a remote area of Weld
County. Commissioner Kirkmeyer indicated this and another similar case were reviewed
in a worksession and research showed various surrounding cities' and counties' zoning
ordinances required Special Use Permits. Using that fact as a guideline, she stated the
most reasonable compromise is to require the Special Use Permit application and to waive
the normal fees for such application, and asked Mr. McConnell if he was willing to complete
the application. Mr. McConnell asked if they could complete the application themselves or
if they would be required to hire someone. Commissioner Hall responded that the permit
application hopefully was user-friendly enough so they could complete it themselves and
the Board reassured Mr. McConnell that Planning staff would be available to assist them.
Commissioner Harbert stated the Board was attempting to be both fair and proactive
regarding bed and breakfast establishments in the County by trying to keep ahead of the
trend and establishing reasonable guidelines for compliance. She asked if ninety days
941604
PL0824
CC �G�e/}
BUILDING CODE AND ZONING VIOLATIONS
PAGE 2
would be adequate time for Mr. McConnell to complete and submit the Special Review
Permit application. Mr. McConnell affirmed it was adequate time. No public opinion was
offered. Commissioner Harbert moved to delay referral to the County Attorney for legal
action of VI #2040 against Craig and Noreen McConnell for ninety days to allow the
property owners time to complete and submit to the Department of Planning Services a
Special Review Permit application. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Baxter and
carried unanimously.
VI # 2135 - Louis and Burtis Brantner/Douglas Adams. Tenant: Mr. Kramer reviewed
the case file, including a video taken of the property on November 7, 1994, for the record.
He reported the noncommercial junkyard, primarily derelict vehicles and piled wood panels,
is a violation of Sections 31.2 and 31.3.9 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, and to
bring the property into compliance, a screening plan must be submitted to the Department
of Planning Services for approval or the junk must be removed from the property. Douglas
Adams, tenant, was present and said he could have the autos moved within thirty days.
In response to Commissioner Kirkmeyer's question regarding the wood panels, Mr. Adams
stated his intention to use the panels to build a shed, and indicated it would take additional
time to complete that project. The Board advised Mr. Adams the panels would not be
included in the violation if, indeed, they are to be used to build the shed; however, this
matter has been ongoing since August 1994, and requires resolution. Mr. Adams
responded that, although he has not moved the vehicles, he has cleaned up the property
considerably. Gene Brantner, son and representative of the property owners, stated
concerns about the type of structure the tenant plans to build and questioned whether the
tenant should have to remove an unlicensed pickup and trailer parked on County right-of-
way on the property, and hay stacked on said right-of-way. Mr. Barker verified that
unlicensed vehicles are considered derelict, and not legal on any public roadway, therefore,
must be removed from County right of way. After some discussion regarding the type of
shed and materials used in building it, Mr. Barker clarified the violation being addressed at
this hearing is only the storage of the building materials and derelict vehicles; where, what
type, and with what the shed is built, since it does not require a building permit, is between
the landlord and tenant. Responding to Commissioner Kirkmeyer, Mr. Adams stated he
would have the derelict vehicles and wood panels moved within thirty days, and his horses
would consume in the next few days all hay stacked in the right-of-way; however, the tractor
tires and vehicles belonged to the previous tenant. No further public testimony was offered.
Commissioner Hall moved to delay referral of VI #2135 against Louis Burtis Brantner and
Doug Adams, Tenant, to the County Attorney for legal action for thirty days to allow time
for the property owners and tenant to remove the vehicles and materials from the property
and County right-of-way. Commissioner Kirkmeyer seconded the motion, which was
carried unanimously.
VI #2132 - Betty Miller: Mr. Kramer reviewed the case report for the record and indicated
the storage of the drilling rig and related equipment on this property is a violation of Section
31.2 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. To correct the violation, the property owner
must apply for a Special Review Permit and be approved, or remove the operation from the
property. Mr. Kramer reported he spoke to Ed Loman, owner of Veco Drilling and the
equipment being stored on this property, who indicated the equipment would be moved by
November 15, 1994. Mr. Kramer also spoke with Jerry Miller, the property owner's son,
who concurred with this removal date. The property owner was neither present nor
represented. In response to questions from the Board, County Attorney Bruce Barker
advised deferral until after November 15, to ensure the equipment is moved by that date.
No public testimony was offered. Commissioner Hall moved to delay referral to the County
Attorney for legal action of VI #2132 against Betty Miller until November 16, 1994.
Commissioner Kirkmeyer seconded the motion, which was carried unanimously.
PL0824
BUILDING CODE AND ZONING VIOLATIONS
PAGE 3
BCV #2133 - River Valley Village/Kevin and Christine Bender. Tenant: Mr. Kramer
reported this case was closed.
BCV#2130 - River Valley Village/Kim Estorga, Tenant: Mr. Kramer reviewed the case
file for the record and reported the property owner/tenant failed to compete the plumbing
inspection within the required 180 days on this mobile home,which is a violation of Sections
60.5.1 and 70.4.2 of the Weld County Building Code. To come into compliance, all
inspections must be completed, approved and the permit finalized, or the mobile home
must be removed from the property. The property owners and tenant were neither present
nor represented. No public comment was offered. Commissioner Hall moved to refer BCV
#2130 against River Valley Village and Kim Estorga, Tenant, to the County Attorney for
legal action. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Baxter and carried unanimously.
BCV#2136 - Nick Bacria: Mr. Kramer reviewed the case report for the record, indicating
this violation is a result of a reinspection of a zoning violation brought before the Board in
May 1994. He suggested Mr. Bacria's occupancy of this mobile home without the final
inspections and a certificate of occupancy is a violation of Section 30.5.2 of the Weld
County Building Code. To correct the violation, the property owner must complete and
have approved all inspections, and receive a Certificate of Occupancy, or vacate the
residence. Mr. Stoner indicated Mr. Bacria has a tenant renting the house on the property
and, although he lists his address as Longmont, has moved belongings and furnishings into
the trailer. Mr. Stoner spoke prior to this hearing on the phone with Mr. Bacria, who
indicated he has been successfully employed for five weeks and now has a contractor
involved with the project. The property owner was neither present nor represented. No
public comment was offered. Since the Board previously extended Mr. Bacria a generous
amount of time to bring this property into compliance, Commissioner Hall made the motion
to refer BCV#2136 against Nick Bacria to the County Attorney for legal action. The motion
was seconded by Commissioner Baxter and carried unanimously.
This Certification was approved on the 11th day of November, 1994.
APPROVED:
ATTEST: LiO/i1A/r'�� BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
LSirm14Weld County Clerk to the Board
By: , 1 ((?Qt .`. W. H. an
Deputy to the Board
EXCUSED DATE OF APPROVAL
Dale KBHall, Pro Te '��
TAPE #94-43
RESO # 941111 - 941115 à?24rK
9e E. axter
PLO824
Constance L. Harbert
EXCUSED DATE OF APPROVAL
Barbara J. Kirkmeyer
PL0824
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
VIOLATION HEARINGS AGENDA
Tuesday, November 8, 1994 TAPE #94-43
ROLL CALL: W. H. Webster, Chairman
Dale K. Hall, Pro-Tern
George E. Baxter
Constance L. Harbert
Barbara J. Kirkmeyer
Also present:
County Attorney, Bruce Barker
Acting Clerk to the Board, Lin Dodge
Planning Department representative, Barry Kramer
Planning Department representative, Ed Stoner
•
PLANNING:
NEW: 1) VI #2040 - McConnell
2) VI #2135 - Brantner/Adams
3) VI #2132 - Miller
4) BCV#2133 - River Valley Village/Bender- CLOSED
5) BCV#2130 - River Valley Village/Estorga
6) BCV#2136 - Bacria
tot* MEMORANDUM
h �P� TO: Board of County Commissioners November 3, 1994
COLORADO From: Barry Kramer, Building Inspection Technician
SUBJECT: Zoning and Building Code Violations Hearing
The Department of Planning Services has scheduled the following violations to be considered at
the November 8, 1994 hearing beginning at 10:00 a.m. The Department of Planning Services
is requesting that the Board review the individual violation cases and determine whether or not
to authorize legal action to remedy the violations.
VI-2040 Craig and Noreen McConnell
section(s) 31.2, 31.3 W.C.Z.O.
Commercial Operation (bed and breakfast)
VI-2135 Louis and Burtis Branf$r/Property Owner Doug Adams /Tenant
section(s) 31.2, 31.3.9 W.C.Z.O.
Noncommercial Junkyard
VI-2132 Betty Miller
section(s) 31.2 W.C.Z.O.
Oil and Gas Support and Service Facility
BCV-2133 River Valley Village /Property Owner Kevin and Christine Bender/Tenant
section(s) 20.9.8, 70.4.2 W.C.B.C.O.
Failure to Complete Inspections
BCV-2130 River Valley Village/ Property Owner Kim Estorga /Tenant
section(s) 60.5.1, 70.4.2 W.C.B.C.O.
Failure to Complete Inspections
BCV-2136 Nick Bacria
section(s) 30.5.2 W.C.B.C.O.
Occupancy of a Residence Without The Final Inspection or a Certificate of Occupancy
Hello