The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About901462.tiff RESOLUTION RE: THE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, 1990, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PETITION OF: KOMINSKI CHONG AE 110 9 ST FT LUPTON, CO 80621 DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: PIN: R 0098788 PARCEL: 147106415005 - FT WLA-5 L5 WEST LAKE ADDITION PUD WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, organized as a Board of Equalization for the purpose of adjusting, equalizing, raising or lowering the assessment and valuation of real and personal property within this County, fixed and made by the County Assessor for the year 1990, and WHEREAS, said petition has been heard before the County Assessor and due notice of adjustment thereon has been given to the taxpayer(s) , and WHEREAS, the taxpayer(s) presented a petition of appeal to the County Assessor's valuation for the year 1990, claiming grounds for relief thereunder stating the property described in such petition was assessed too high, as more specifically stated in said petition, and WHEREAS, in lieu of the hearing scheduled before the Board of Equalization a Stipulation was agreed upon by the Assessor and said petitioner(s) , and WHEREAS, it is hereby Stipulated to by the petitioner(s) that the actual value concerning this property for the 1990 property tax shall be $13 , 651, and WHEREAS, this actual value represents the sum of the value of the land of the property in the amount of $13 , 651, and there being no improvements upon the property, and WHEREAS, said Stipulation shall resolve all issues to have been determined by the Weld County Board of Equalization. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, acting as the Board of Equalization, that the Stipulation agreed to by the Weld County Assessor and the hereinabove named petitioner(s) be, and hereby is, accepted by the Board. 901462 Page 2 RE: BOE - KOMINSKI CHONG AE The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 31st day of Ju , A.D. , 199D. / ATTEST: rrv/61/26e7 BO OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WE UNTY, RADO Weld County Clerk to the Board i� � ene R. Bran ner, Chairman BY: VI CO6-71(-(-42 71<--u. k 4/u:CU x,k, i Deputy Clerk to the Board A(' ,---- 1. � ae 'sge K nedy, Pro-Eem, (/ APPROVED AS TO FORM: / �r onst^ -ra.Tp -Z-C! ance L._ Harbert ) 4z� z - r t-C-1K Agimktounty Attorney C. W. K. Go 915 10th STREET GRF.ELEY,COLORADO 80631 NOTICE OF VENIALPHONE(303)356-4000, EXT.4256 iliCillitill es FT WLA-5 L WEST LAKE AGDi7IUH PUG I" COLORADO ,i 114 MAY 91 (.4' ` i it ONINER KOMINSKI CHONG AE �. . PARCEL 147106415005 t:UMZN; KI CHONi+ AE PIN F. 0091370ts YEAR 1390 110 9 ST LUG 00149 FT LUP70N CO 60621 05/18/1990 The appraised value of property is based on the appropriate consideration of the approaches to value required by law.The Assessor has determined that your property should be included in the following category(ies): Residential property is valued by considering the cost and market approaches. Agricultural land value is determined solely by the earning or production capacity of the land,capitalized at a rate set by law. Producing mines are assessed at 25%of the gross proceeds or 100%of the net proceeds,whichever is greater. Oil and gas leaseholds and lands are assessed at 87.5% of the gross value of the oil and/or gas sold or transported from the premises on primary production;secondary production is valued at 75%. All other property,including vacant land,is valued by considering the cost, market,and income approaches. If your concern is the amount of your property tax, local taxing authorities (county, city, fire protection, and other special districts) hold budget hearings in the fall. Please refer to your tax bill or ask your Assessor for a listing of these districts,and plan to attend these budget hearings. The Assessor has carefully studied all available information, giving particular attention to the specifics included on your protest and has deter- mined the valuation(s) a5gigI1g d to your property. The reasons for this detemioation of vaiug a A REVIEW Of- THE: PIARKLT VALUE OF LAND IN TOUR NE1uHDORHOOD INDICATES YOUR LANG ASSESSMENT IS CONNECT. PETITIONER'S ASSESSOR'S VALUATION PROPERTY CLASSIFICATION ESTIMATE ACTUAL VALUE ACTUAL VALUE OF VALUE PRIOR TO REVIEW AFTER REVIEW 15. 168 15. 166 LAND IMPS TOTALS $ $ 15.1 ACC$ 1=+t 166 39-8-106(1)(a),C.R.S.e Pleases see thecback of this form ford tailed information on filing your ppealision,you have the right to appeal to the County Board of allzation for further consideration, RICHARD W. KEIRNES 05/21/90 By. 16 DATE WELD COUNTY ASSESSOR 0:P -2 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON REVERSE SIDE Form 15 T AD Form 8]/90 - _.. .._�..._.... .._. ... . _ YOU HAVE E....HE RIGt-t�i TO APPEAL THE ASSESSOR'S DECISION .. .. .. .... . . ir' ..r;�, `sli,?i�'fi(er .. :il -• r.. . . .. ---•:---•— ._.. i f iG ts`cs �tlC,r';;!s bc., s•:`ts ing July :.;sircczotinuing through August: 10 for real property :: t •• ,; "' ; :.•s,'+,r: ',,or44rty (filrnishings. machinery+.er=d epi..,ipment). 39.8-104 and 39-8-107(2), C.R.S. REAL ........ ... .... .. . ..---- •------ -- -- .0 .37t.. t3E�flci:nr3S) ERTY PROrEC} •`t' (Land ii. I the Assessor's d,:-R lion. rn.:. lv << <>~ :lt.. .c. on,: ,.:_,E>•;r of this completed form to the County Board of prese-v,:: your right to .:ip{ ea,, �rour' :.tG,pea± int+.St he POSTMARKED OR DELIVERED N _ Oa OR BEFORE • "?Sf.)rir->._P,'#OP•:; -1 =r APPEAL PROCEDURES: (FurnisWrrys, MrEc rir.ery and Equipment) ,7r peai AsseSsr-'S decision, mail or deliver one coOy of this completed form to the County Board of t?rPcerv,: your righ..., to ,:opeal, your appeal must FLEE POSTMARKED OR DELIVERED ON OR BEFORE . • • . • • - • v;'t:;LD COLIN a Y BOARD OF EOLIALiZAfsU"�i 935 0th Street, P.O. Bo>: 758 • r Grur.ir y Coio;ado 80632 Telephone. (30'3) 356-4000, Ext. 4225 ^j.f;�`t; •? N OF HE'A1:3s'3 G! You will he notified of the time and nlac.e se for the hearing of your appeal Y:QU.r`' E :A-.•ION'S.' DETERMINATION: N: County Board of Equa:szatton rnust t?take a decision on your � appeal and mail you a determination within five business a ys. The County Board rirlst conclude their hearings by August 10. Fpri FUF1THER APPEALS: :. not satisfied with the County Board of Equalization's decision, you must file within thirty days of the County {~quel iattjoit's decision to ONE of the following- Board of Assessment Appeals (BRA): BAA at '3 i 3 Sherman, Room 523 Denver-, Colorado 80203, {30:3) 866-5880. District Court: 9th Avenue and 9th Street, P.O. Box C Greeley, Colorado 80632 Telephone (303) 356-4000, Ext. 4520 t Arbitration: . . , WEL! uC?I.jNTY BOARD OF EO.LIALIZATION Lair, lath Street, P.Q. Box 158 Greeley, Colorado 80632 Inle,'i.ittt;rli; 1303) 56-4000, Ext. 4225 • '` ''" o; Eqt.L.ilzation by Autlu;:t. 15, you must file an appeal with ,:�ist.‘s;ii`ent Appeals by September 24. TO PRESERVE `t'CtUR .APPEAL RIGHTS, YOU MUST PROVE. YOL) HAVE FILED A TIMELY APPEAL, Ft.:JirE: WE '3F .)IV MEND ALL CORRESPONDENCE NCE: BE MAILED WITH PROOF OF MAILING. PETITION TO THE COI.€NTY BOARD OF EQUALIZATION li. the space i�etc::', please explain why you disagree with the Assessor's valuation. Attach additional documents as necessary. 1 '• - ._ ll .. ........... .......... c3. pi= F1 tit ''•P ._.._.. ..._... _..._.. _. _.. .. 1990 BOARD OF EQUALIZATION WELD COUNTY, COLORADO ASSESSOR' S PIN NUMBER 0098788 STIPULATION (As to Tax Year 1990 Actual Value) IN RE PETITION OF: Name: KMENSKI CHONG AE Address: 110 9 ST FT LUPTON CO 80621 Petitioner (s) , KOMINSKI CHONG AE and the Weld County Assessor, hereby enter into this Stipulation regarding the tax year 1990 valuation of the subject property, and jointly move the Board of Equalization to enter its order based on this Stipulation. The Petitioner (s) and the Assessor agree and stipulate as follows: 1 . The property subject to this Stipulation is described as : WEST TARF PARK ATn1TTT(TN Pun jfm 5 2 . The subject property is classified as v property (what type) . 3 . The County Assessor originally assigned the following actual value on the subject property for tax year 199n Land $ 15368 Improvements $ 0 Total $ 15.168 4 . After further review and negotiation, the Petitioner (s) and Weld County Assessor agree to the following tax year 1990 actual value for the subject property: Land $ 11,6,51 Improvements $ 0 Total $ 11.651 5 . The valuations , as established above, shall be binding only with respect to tax year 199(1 - 6 . Brief narrative as to why the reduction was made: TOM WAS FOUND TO RR CONSTD RART.Y SMATT.FR THAN TVPTra Lira TIT SAME SUBDIVISION ADIUSTFD -107 7 . Both parties agree that the hearing scheduled before the Board of Equalization on JULY 11 . 199n (date) at 9:00 AM M (time) be vacated; or, a hearing has not yet been scheduled before the Board of Equalization (check if appropriate) . DATED this 2-3 day of , 1990 . Petitioner (s) or -Attorney Petitioner (s) or Attorney Address: Address : Telephone: CSC -) Tele one: hire Coun y Assessor Address : 915 Tenth Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Telephone: 356-4000 , ext. 4256 Weld County Board of Equalization P. O . Box 758 Greeley , Colorado 80632 MAY 25 , 1990 RE : Petition for appeal of property valuation Parcel : 147106415003 147106415005 147106415007 147106415010 Dear Sir : I wish to appeal the decision of the assessor for the above mention parcel ' s . In reviewing the real estate records I have found that the valuation that the assessor ' s office has given to real property in the same PUD is much less . Example : Lot 1 and Lot 4 PUD West Hill Estates assessed value is $1 , 580. At 159 the actual value is $10 , 533 At 297 the actual value is $5 , 482 Lot 8 Blk 2 West Hill Estates assessed value is $1 , 950. At 157 the actual value is $13 , 000 . At 297 the actual value is $6 , 724 Other information : Lot 1 is 12 , 514 sq . ft . Lot 4 is 10 , 028 sq . ft . Lot 8 Blk 2 is 6060 sq . ft . With this information I cannot understand why the Assessor ' s office can justify the increase to 15 , 168 for the actual valuation per lot . This makes the assessed value 4 , 398 . At the prior year value of 10 , 500 and assessed value of 3 , 045 these amounts are much higher then the above examples . I also do not agree with the Assessor ' s office that the size of the lots is not a factor in the current value . Lot 10 9 , 337 sq . ft . Lot 7 13 , 884 sq . ft . Lot 5 7 , 986 sq . ft . Lot 3 9 , 284 sq . ft . Also lots 10 and 7 are yet completed sites and do not have the same value as the others. I hope the Board of Equalization will give this matter a fair review and thank you for your help in this matter . Sincerely yours ,CAntinkle—VctThrChong Ae Kominski %Jig :I. ts1 lel ft V iii 0 4 1 ri, �'M:10'a `_NIA 'n •oes b/13S b/IMS Z/IS Pun --. _- --_ salolZ.3 IIIH s 10es] II!H clan � yseM -£ Naois `I 401 -£ 110016 `I tU_I i0 OO A I f` 10 •pgnsa8 o {o oun -3 11 OL tg OOOS gnsad o {o ',00 3S ' -o I 700LbG I —00 00'001 -o O'IZ O1Z OIr_ _—_ — -r--------- — — I .1.:--i. 1, — ..xis 1,./ ¢ o - -- c E ,�,.e I o �., I - I i a _ 0 8031°1,c, 1 - ;' o 0 0 0 r -O I M e I O n ,0 Y• . I nm 04 d m m ;tic fir. -NI ;. o nl ry 1 '\ e..*, � co I ` ems - J1 co- NI IOIt--00'IS- - I (*Cr") “ar'1.6.5 . di I I M,S1,61o0ON 1 ; a�h�.• v_ I 00'001 I = $ I •\ \ • v . a I1 I 00'0,01 3N0£,21000S 1 ; —,J _e— > O Q > _ I w ` _....' ,C,_+ ,F , I N • in O I ‘ -C 0- SI d �{ '+ ' 1 N ..} Y Jt O I N O v 3 m E F V t I N IV^ ¢ R G) C wce I 1 M W N is 00 ) .. _ar 10 N W now O N r 7 1 1 is ii io p�,,.,f'p ry t� �/++'mma,, O• •—IIIIIIIIIII C'2 �z. / m 3s�b;8s fr, 9 • ,'O/ -`gd 06 I O ` ,. d I (1.% ON py.N „I_ �Y-� I I 01 '6 -01 1 \1AD ' CO to I IC _ 1 N W '� µms'....\in fy;:. an gam' I�o`r 0 • _ Ir� ti , co m O I -a•N -in W / (t.. \NI FO% I N •I � tr / �e I' , +/ jam • ti� e, au I I � .' i •Ewe -m /i0 E 02 u61. „,�___ •�' o`LOi�_ y� c O W p O r/� o /•• / FN SON 1 'E '�'' �_ 0 I "`w�TI• 14 '' w` ` R-8342 \S\'at .. • I... w• I / /... \.' Y o o ' ft m I I QA .°4,,.,+ ` / <, i 1 n m m l j n "C.-4,,g,„ a / i 1 N ° �O *, t e s (� - Fry,rC o - j I\^, � ,,, +a. 0 0 0° ,r; -N o o l'/) ME Imo` V J O F ^i a s,`c o v o . i 3 0®F Oo�9 `'�. h'�h °� o.c. E o N Er In 0 • t `n C' .. // 9 . / �0 d N Oi co ,: o I SI�I� 1 , do .\ 003 w a 'e 00'01 w to l I O ma -o, et'� t. I .O� 00 �� m _0 1 ' -' 1 •6, sa \ m , - [1 a ," o .'fie I I \ N o O - e ' ' I I A . h .m o m _ ,./ !'t 1 I A M k p 0 Z ' 2 'i I J O N r.. OOG wN\ Io W :: Jj .; I . I 0 . `� dJ - - I Jl 1 • {/ • � h 1 _` 1 \ t.. I N t I I a �\ _• •°oF _T ,ol �� Chi . 1 I • •oc0 � 00 N I fl i seo co`orgy _ I m VI�LJ. I IP O\ r I .43 I /�G \� O I in-J I `+ ‘ I /./ ✓l I "s�T— m—I \ m c I ✓1 l) i d p .\ o f �7 I ,00 0e ° o I o \ �//�y rJ l �Su `'2 �. o w 1 0 1 I 62 • . -0 �\i N \• �� 11 \ \�q \\ N \ !D T , 01, 1 Cl'1.1\ii Hello