The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About901556.tiff palse01 bet SEPTEIVISER 1990 S M T W T F S '4,01 ; d a•y 1 4 5 6 7 8 0 11 12 13 14 15 17 18 19 20 21 22 24 25 26 27 28 29 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AGENDA Wednesday, September 5, 1990 Tape *90-32 ROLL CALL: Gene R. Brantner, Chairman George Kennedy, Pro-Tem Constance L. Harbert C.W. Kirby Gordon E. Lacy MINUTES: Approval o£ minutes of August 29, 1990 " CERTIFICATIONS OF HEARINGS: Hearings conducted on August 29, 1990: 1) Special Review Permit, Jefferson; 2) Show Cause Hearing, Hessee; 3) Amend weld County Building Code Ordinance; and 4) Special Review Permit, Pickert (Chairman Brantner excused) ADDITIONS TO AGENDA: None • APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA: PRESENTATION: 1) Recognition of Services - Ray A. West DEPARTMENT HEADS AND 'a ELECTED OFFICIALS: 1) Paul Stoddard, Coroner COUNTY FINANCE OFFICER: 1) Warrants (Donald Warden) BIDS: 1) Consider sole-source purchase of headsets - Ambulance Service 2) Approve weld County Bridges 78/13A and 80.5/17A BUSINESS: NEW: 1) Consider Lease Agreement between FENWC and House of Neighborly Service and authorize Chairman to sign • 2) Consider Lease Agreement between FENWC and Trinity House Corporation and authorize Chairman to sign 3) Consider 1990 FENWC Child Care Food Program Grant Application and • authorize Chairman to sign 4) Consider Purchase of services Agreement with various dentists and authorize Chairman to sign 5) Consider protest concerning mowing services by Pest and Weed Department - Eichler 6) Consider Cooperative Reimbursement Agreement between District Attorney and social Services and authorize Chairman to sign 7) Consider Plowing Permit and acceptance of collateral and authorize Chairman to sign - Farley 8) Consider Street Grading and Snow Removal Agreement with Town of Frederick and authorize Chairman to sign 9) Consider Amendment to Lease with weld Library District and authorize Chairman to sign Continued on Page 2 of Agenda • Page 2 of Agenda • New Business continued • 10) Consider Memorandum of Understanding with Colorado State University Cooperative Extension and authorize Chairman to sign 11) Consider Contract with State Department of Health for Division of Emergency Medical Services Grants Program and authorize Chairman to sign 12) Consider purchase o£ Services Agreement between Social Services and District Attorney and authorize Chairman to sign 13) Consider Resolution re: Rescind Resolution concerning Electronic Monitoring Program Service 14) Consider Resolution re: Contract for Electronic Monitoring Services and authorize Chairman to sign 15) Consider Resolution re: modify list of Arbitrators for Property Assessment Appeals • 16) Consider Resolutions re: Temporary closure of WCR 53 between WCR 42 and 44; WCR 18 between WCR 73 and 75;; WCR 17 between U.S. Highway 34 and WCR 60; and WCR 84 between WCR 21 and 23 'y PLANNING: 1) Consider Resolution re: Building Code and Zoning Violations - McKinley; • Bowen; Stewart; Lyons; and Roberton 2) Consider demolition of dangerous building - Howard (cont. from 8/15/90) 3) Consider ZPMH #1681 - Miller/Gomez 1 . . . p 4 4 4 0 ;.0 a P ' 4 ;4 . 4 V '4 ,4 _ 0 4 4 N 0. -. 4 4 V• 4 4 N r� ,. 4 . 0 Wednesday, September 5, 1990 • 4 � w 4 CONSENT AGENDA APPOINTMENTS: Sep 5 - Work Session 9:30 AM Sep 5 - Meeting with Adams County Commissioners 12:00 NOON Sep 5 - County Council 7:30 PM Sep 6 - Local Emergency Planning Committee 2:00 PM Sep 6 - Island Grove Park Advisory Board 3:30 PM Sep 10 - Private Industry Council 7:30 AM Sap 10 - Work Session 10:30 AM Sep 10 - Fair Board 7:30 PM Sep 10 - Weld Mental Health 7:30 PM Sep 11 - Juvenile Community Review Board 12:60 NOON Sep 12 - EDAP 7:00 AM sep 14 - Community Corrections 12:00 NOON HEARINGS: Sep 12 - Special Review Permit, Livestock confinement operation (1,500 cattle) , horse boarding and training facility (150 head) , and tack and feed store, Joy A. Jefferson (cont. from 8/29/90) 10:00 AM Sep 12 - Change of Zone, PUD (Planned Unit Development) to A (Agricultural) , City of Longmont 10:00 AM Sep 12 - Change of Zone, A (Agricultural) and C-3 (Commercial) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) with C-3 and I-3 uses, Flatiron Structures/Azalea Farms 10:00 AM Sep 19 - Certificate of Designation, Sludge composting facility in the A (Agricultural) Zone District, City of Longmont 10:00 AM Sep 19 - Certificate o£ Designation, Roggen Disposal, Inc. 10:00 AM Oct 3 - Special Review Permit, Home business (plumbing shop) in the A (Agricultural) Zone District, George W., III, and Barbara J. Corman 10:00 AM 4 Nov 7 - Show Cause Hearing, Richard Hessee (cont. from 8/29/90) 10:00 AM REPORTS: 1) George Goodell, Road and Bridge Director, re: Road openings COMMUNICATIONS: 1) State Division of Labor re: Application and Corrected Application for Hearing and Notice to Set; and Entry of Appearance - Davidson vs. Board 2) Planning Commission Agenda for September 4, 1990 3) Summons and Amended Complaint - Kozel vs... Board 4) State Board of Land Commissioners - Notice of Oil & Gas Lease Auction 5) State Department of Natural Resources re: Lockhart Geophysical Company 6) State Advisory committee on Deafness re: Social Services r: 7) Anne D. Nye, Public Trustee - Notice of Rights to Cure or Redeem 8) state Division of Aviation re: Colorado Aeronautical Board meeting 9) Laku Landing re: Gravel in Northeastern Colorado 10) Foster Valuation Company re: Permission to appear on agenda 11) U.S. Bureau of the Census re: Local Review Program 12) City of Dacono - IKP Annexation Impact Report 13) Elaine Miller re: ZPMH #1679 - Martinez 14) State Division of Property Taxation re: Files No. 62-01-449-(O1) and 62-01-0069-(01) 15) Natural Energy Resources Company re: Union Park Alternative to Two Forks Dam 16) Public Utilities Commission re: Docket No. 90A-073R and 90A-525EF 17) State Oil and Gas Conservation Commission - Notification of Proceedings and Notices of Hearings 18) Nuclear Regulatory Commission re: Public Service Company of Colorado; • • Review of Fort St. Vrain Quality Assurance Program Description; and Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Amendment and Opportunity for Hearing 19) State Board of Assessment Appeals re: Holt; Dillon Real Estate Company; Little Caesars Pizza of Northern Colorado, Inc.; D.Q. Restaurants of Colorado, Ltd.; Power Car Wash Investors, Ltd. , II; and North American Property Consultants, Inc. - 22 (Available in Clerk to the Board's • Office) Continued on Page 2 of Consent Agenda Wednesday, September 5, 1990 Page 2 of Consent Agenda PLANNING STAFF 1) ZPMH #1618 - Riedingar APPROVALS: 2) RE #1248 - Trostel, et al. RESOLUTIONS: * 1) Approve continuance of Special Review Permit - Jefferson * 2) Approve continuance of Show Cause Hearing - Hessee * 3) Approve Special Review Permit - Pickert * 4) Approve Handicapped Children's Program Contract with State Department of Health * 5) Approve Road Improvements Agreement with National Hog Farms, Inc. * 6) Approve Communication Radio Antenna Agreement and Disclaimer of Ownership with KGWN-TV Television Station * 7) Action of Board concerning demolition of dangerous building - Medford * 8) Approve 3.28 Beer License for L. Jensen, dba High'_andlake, Inc. * 9) Authorize County Attorney to proceed with legal action - Building Code and Zoning Violations * 10) Approve modified list of Arbitrators for Property Assessment Appeals * 11) Rescind Resolution concerning Electronic Monitoring Program Service * 12) Approve Contract for Electronic Monitoring Services • * 13) Approve temporary closure of WCR 53 between WCR 42 and 44 * 14) Approve temporary closure of WCR 18 between WCR 73 and 75} * 15) Approve temporary closure of WCR 17 between U.S. Highway 34 and WCR 60 * 16) Approve temporary closure of WCR 84 between WCR 21 and 23 • PRESENTATION: * 1) Recognition of Services - Ray A. West AGREEMENT: * 1) Weld County Bridges 78/13A and 80.5/17A - Paramount Construction, Inc. * Signed at this meeting • Wednesday, September 5, 1990 i .t RESOLUTION RE: APPROVE CONTINUANCE OF HEARING TO CONSIDER AMENDED USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW - JEFFERSON WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners held a public hearing on the 29th day of August, 1990, at the hour of 10:00 a.m. in the Chambers of the Board for the purpose of hearing the Amended Use by Special Review of Joy A. Jefferson, 35 Martin Lane, Englewood, Colorado 80110, and WHEREAS, at said hearing Commissioner Rirby excused himself due to a possible conflict of interest, and WHEREAS, R. Russell Anson, Attorney representing the applicant, requested that this matter be continued because there were only three Commissioners present at today's hearing, and WHEREAS, the Board received conflicting recommendations from the Windsor Planning Commission, and would like to have this matter clarified. WHEREAS, it was determined by the Board that this matter be continued to September 12, 1990. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of weld County, Colorado, that the hearing to consider the Amended Use by Special Review for Joy Jefferson, be, and hereby is, continued to September 12, 1990, at 10:00 a.m. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that the Windsor Planning Commission be asked to clarify its position on the conflicting recommendations, and whether it properly reached that position. 900781 I v, 4nzfo. 4;/— Page 2 RE: CONTINUE AMENDED USR HEARING - JEFFERSON The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 29th day of August, A.D. , 1990. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: Liiptizat WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County Clerk to the Board EXCUSED Gene R. Brantn`er, Chairman • BY: 114 / f k plpA) Ge ge Kennedy, Pro-Te T� Deputy glerk to the Board �- 4446-412 APPROVED AS TO FORM: Constance x � � L. Harbe t EXCUSED C.W. Ki Tic, County Attorney CO/• 900781 RESOLUTION RE: APPROVE CONTINUANCE OF HEARING TO SHOW CAUSE FOR REVOCATION OF SPECIAL USE PERMIT *208 - HESSEE WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, on August 29, 1990 , a hearing was held to show cause for revocation of Special Use Permit No. 208, held by Richard Hessee, and WHEREAS, at said hearing the Board was advised that Mr. Hessee has applied for an Amended Special Use Permit, and WHEREAS, the Board deems it advisable to continue said Show Cause to allow the submitted Amended Special Use Permit to be heard by the Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the hearing to show cause for revocation of Special Use Permit No. 208, held by Richard Hessee, be, and hereby is, continued to November 7, 1990, at 10:00 a.m. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 29th day of August, A.D. , 1990. n � BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: � ) _ {�7 �J klear WELD COUNTY, COLORADO . Weld County Clerk to the Board EXCUSED Gene Brantner, Chairman BY; Ge rge ennedy, Pro-Tem v Deputy 90.erk to the Board APPROVED AS TO FORM: onstance L. Har ert C.W Kirsy i I *An i ounty Attorney EXCUSED DATE OF SIGNING - AXE Gordon E. Lacy // 0 '790078; L c • RESOLUTION RE: APPROVE. SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT FOR LIVESTOCK CONFINEMENT OPERATION - PICKERT WHEREAS, the Board o£ County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners held a public hearing on the 29th day of August, 1990, at the hour of 10:00 a.m. in the Chambers of the Board for the purpose of hearing the application of William Bradley Pickert and Everdina Ann Marie Rickert, 19504 weld County Road 5, Berthoud, Colorado 80513, for a Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit for a Livestock confinement operation (1,000 head dairy with six residences) on the following described real estate, to-wit: Part of the Wi o£ Section 28, Township 4 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado WHEREAS, Bradley Rickert, one of the applicants, was present, and WHEREAS, Section 24.4.2 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance provides standards for review of said Special Review Permit, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners heard all of the testimony and statements of those present, has studied the request of the applicant and the recommendations of the Weld County Planning Commission and all of the exhibits and evidence presented in this matter and, having been fully informed, finds that this request shall be approved for the following reasons: I. The submitted materials are in compliance with the application requirements of Section 24.7 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 2. It is the opinion of the Board of County Commissioners that the applicant has shown compliance with Section 24.4.2 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: 900783 ;! i K. Page 2 RE: USR - PICRERT a. The proposal is , consistent with the intent of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan Agricultural Goals and Policies are intended to support and preserve agricultural industries and farming. b. The proposed use is a livestock confinement operation and is provided for as a Use by Special Review in the Agricultural Zone District. c. The uses permitted will be compatible with the existing surrounding land uses and with the future development for the surrounding area as permitted by the Agricultural Zone District. The surrounding land uses include agricultural production, dairy operation, and rural residences. d. No overlay districts affect the site. e. Special Review Permit Development Standards will provide adequate protection of the health, safety, and welfare of the neighborhood and County. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners o£ Weld County, Colorado, that the application for a Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit for a Livestock confinement operation (1,000 head dairy with six residences) on the hereinabove described parcel of land be, and hereby is, granted subject to the following conditions: 1. The attached Development Standards for the Special Review Permit shall be adopted and placed on the Special Review plat prior to recording the plat. The plat shall be delivered to the Department of Planning Services and be ready for recording in the Weld County Clerk and Recorder's Office within 15 days of approval by the Board of County Commissioners. 2. The Special Review activity shall not occur nor shall any building or electrical permits be issued on the property until the Special Review plat is ready to be recorded in the office of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. 900783 Page 3 RE: USR - RICKERT 3. Prior to recording, the Special Review plat shall be amended to show the lagoon berm 50 feet from the center line of Weld County Road 5. 4 . Within 30 days o£ approval by the Board of County Commissioners, an ISDS evaluation on all septic systems shall be completed prior to issuing the required septic permits on all existing systems. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 29th day of August, A.D. , 1990. ATTEST: MeltBOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County Clerk to the Board EXCUSED Gene R. Brantner, Chairman BY: L./MAMA, a rge Kenney:Zir Lm it Deputy erk to the Board/�• ///,c/� a APPROVED AS TO FORM: Constance L. arbert 4//•Az _ C.W. Kirby .may^ .mss yh,County Attorney EXCUSED DATE OF SIGNING - AYE Gordon E. Lacy A ". 900783 • DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS WILLIAM BRADLEY PICKERT AND EVERDINA ANN MARIE PICKERT 1. The Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit is for a livestock confinement operation (1,000 head dairy with up to six dwellings) as submitted in the application materials on file in the Department of Planning Services and subject to the Development Standards stated herein. 2. Approval of this plan may create a vested property right pursuant to Article 68 of Title 24, C.R.S. , as amended. 3. The applicant shall remove, handle, and stockpile manure from • the livestock confinement area in a manner that will prevent • nuisance conditions. The manure ,piles shall not be allowed to exist or deteriorate to tia condition that facilitates excessive odors, flies or insect pests, or pollutant runoff. The manure storage site shall have a water tight surface which does not permit seepage or percolation of manure pollutants into the ground. 4. The facility shall be in compliance at all times with the State Health Department Regulations, Colorado Guidelines for Feedlot Runoff Containment. 5. The facility shall comply with all State Health Department requirements for construction and operation of a dairy. Waste disposal retention and containment facilities shall be reviewed and approved by the Weld County Health Department and constructed in compliance with State statutes. • 6_ Waste oil, waste paints, stains, treatments, spent drug containers, empty livestock dip containers, anti-freeze, and other associated liquid and , ,lid wastes shall be stored and removed for final disposal in a manner that protects against surface and groundwater contamination. W 7. No permanent disposal of wastes shall be permitted at this site. 8. Wood shavings, sawdust, and waste materials shall be handled, stored, and disposed of in a manner that controls fugitive dust, blowing debris, and other potential nuisance conditions. 900783 Page 2 RE: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - PICKERT 9. Fugitive dust shall be controlled on this site. 10. Runoff from the livestock confinement operation shall be contained on site. 11. All construction on the property shall be in accordance with the requirements of the weld County Building Code Ordinance. 12. The property owner or operator shell be responsible for complying with the Operation Standards of Section 24.5 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 13. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Operation Standards of Section 24 .6 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 14. Personnel from the State Health Department, the Weld County Health Department and the Weld County Department of Planning Services shall be granted access onto the property at any reasonable time in order to ensure the activities carried out on the property comply with the Development Standards stated herein and all applicable Weld County Regulations. 15. The Special Review area shall be limited to the plans shown herein and governed by the foregoing Standards and all applicable Weld County Regulations. Major changes from the plans or Development Standards as shown or stated shall require the approval of an amendment of the Permit by the Weld County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners before such changes from the plans or Development Standards are permitted. Any other changes shall be Lied in the office of the Department of Planning Services. 16. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with all of the foregoing Development Standards. Noncompliance with any of the foregoing Development Standards may be reason for revocation of the Permit by the Board of County Commissioners. 900783 r STATE OF COLORADO 1 )s.s. COUNTY OF WELD ) David H. Reynolds, being duly sworn, says that he is publisher of The New News, a weekly newspaper published in Keenesburg in said County and State; that said newspaper has a innUCNMICZ general circulation in said County y and has been continously anda mod A t4::uninterruptedly published therein, during a period of at least "-' y,, tb„ fifty-two consecutive weeks prior to i �w the first publication of the annexed e'td e,rya. •a, "mud rdreilya Notice; that said newspaper is a a sraer newspaper within the meaning of the a„e'�vva ian Mane act of the General Assembly of the CagracW7��1 State of Colorado, entitled "An Act weirs a a"ai to regulate the printing of legal , W ca, notices and advertisements, " and --- - - amendments thereto; that the notice with m,aodden of which the annexed is a printed ,ABM*. 'macre. . copy taken from said newspaper, was y Q� n,ror�te�mt�° published in said newspaper, and in m�� a �"dad the regular and entire issue of yf°P`a or every number thereof , �gq�� wnxutiy' _;Wlia nt once a week for i .. successive weeks; that said notice � .:. . was so published in said newspaper — ... proper and not in any supplement thereof, and that the first publication of said notice as aforesaid, was on the day of .S3i-citt , 19 9 0 , and the last on the to day of 0 Subscribed and sworh t before i \ me this .1.± day of � �`u , 192 / 9C0133 de22no. e 4., ,t....J *, •Cp'tnm y `, on ooms rviztl i si992 Ml , �sonar";.- AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION t.d leie YINId Camel Zoning r"nrsa a,nn THE JONNSTOWNBREEZE rag:of nna: Val STATE Of COLORADO > _ i ss ar n" ` Ai°twine COUNTY OF WELD Na+ ~I^"+'� 'n""�`°� 1,Clyde Briggs,do solemnly swear that 1 ``` +r a�a -^rjt be am publisher of The Johnstown Breeze; ^'. U.rE. ` that the same Is a weekly newspaper e frosoura eo,. �w printed. In whuln or in part, and Published -maid• the $onone a NSID the Sa�baw in the County of Weld, Stale of Colorado. .,, its % Is �oeW andhasagcnaercYohBSlatieenon herein: that dm publisdted • �_,�,, said newspaper 1 in said ;WSW ' tallb�O�oMno continuously and uninterruptedly�.aawn�dt+aa` County of Weld fair a period of more than =.40�trwrsorMINbee.euwatma tlaoa fiftylwo tansy alive weeks prior to thu ay; the ww � '� first publication of the annexed legal notice Zaw=aim Coati first advertisement:; that said newspaper has 14oetie.,wre ewer o-a f 01610th Weft 7�Rom been admitted to the at said States marls as y D o s 00.35 0. second-class matter under the provisions u any of o- .-- true w the Art of March 3• Bad that said v, Yield„eryRood.ne amendments thereof, r duly _ t� newspaper is a weekly newspaper,a,q,00ane6 etpaln qualified for publishing legal notices and advertisements within the meaning of the a ""p"tzp1p°° laws of the State of Colorado. MUSIC IMISPICOODIVInnitPlim That the annexed legal notice or advertise- ;nptse:541•aw ,000 teed , moot was published In the regular and �,yb„ pep ne.e _ entire issue of every number of sAA[d weekly a.�y.en, - newspaper for the period of ..d., consccu- _ g", `ameriew � live Insertions; and that the first comes PA.WI wqt publication or said noNr:rivysin the issu�of said newspaper' dublieu�tjl/.97.3o f said notice estcra trado nt; . .a+Ma, t o and that the lust p dated �d�a „t; , was in the Issue of said newspaper „ ., A.D. 19 pater► f�� d0t •..1n witness tr4tereQQ{� 1 have hereunwets to war my hand,,l�Irs •••a••Y•• • wtana°1crwtr �0°" K TO Yet eoe►o A.D. 19.7.V erlarsrrrrc'p.wM ync:a,osa-0sso : - . py ec rususnecea,6uess woe iiiire a!1M°`" Subzc d and sworn to me. a Notary to of of and for thlsaV County Y of Id.Stalg of Colorado cra. A.D. 19.,10.. ��.: ��..S:�.� Notary Plush; My commission expires ..........'••............ Itt,Cyr -.,^n^,r,.cs Juno 14,121 Join ;c :n,CO 205'A . 9C0783 • . , . STATE OF COLORADO ) )s.s. COUNTY OF WELD ) David B. Reynolds, being duly sworn, says that he is publisher of The New News, a weekly newspaper published in Keenesburp in said County KJ tv tralicildritsisi,.,,tr) vtr:utr, and State; that said newspaper has a t general circulation in said County ; and has been continously and Or ' uninterruptedly published therein, - , during a period of at least �r ene ,. y fifty-two consecutive weeks prior to su, `.- . the first publication of the annexed ,',,ivi:a es notice; that said newspaper is a ',n-,: AIR! newspaper within the meaning of the !1.4 oet, act of the General Assembly of the c^; 'Cr°tilitA tm�tali State of Colorado, entitled "An Act �'' e.. to regulate the printing of legal f " e, ' notices and advertisements, " and wnth aclka mope, ", _,r amendments thereto; that the notice , of which the annexed is a printed c' -,412t a tt copy taken from said newspaper, was ; h?, * e a a published in said newspaper, and in t - u+. the regular and entire issue of pi°'"°"''i�t:me -- every number thereof, soar •' once a week for 1 7aia _. successive weeks; 'that said notice Sr +�''p°was so published in said newspaper �' fle mea''sp.a.taDee�ec proper and not in any supplement n,:armk !) ' thereof, and that the first :4 : iAd publication of said notice as � �.. m_" "' aforesaid, was on the alt`; a�a aeahi . ) 1L day of_ A k , , 19 a 6 , fir$ Z. 7 t•r,... , W b: • an the last on the )1_,_ day of y` •k ^ .boa-yr f~ Subscribed and sworn t before L me this Z Q day of �,t , 14_fr.. a 9O8733 My Commission^gyp~v 7 ^`: 1 d-14 Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting August 21, 1990 Page 9 e Keith Schuett stated this request is primarily to bring the property into conformance with the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the audience. Lee Bobletts, co-owner of property west and adjacent to the airport, stated they have always worked with the Airport Authority to enable it to grow. Their property is zoned for office use and they do not want to compete with the airport for office space. The Chairman asks ' Keith Schuett to read the recommendation of the Department of Planning Services' staff into the record. MOTION: Jean Hoffman moved Case Number Z-456, Greeley/Weld County Airport, for a Change of Zone from Agricultural and Industrial-TT:zee to Planned Unit Development for Commercial-Three and Industrial-Three uses be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with the Planning Commission's recommendation for approval based upon the recommendation, conditions, and development standards presented by the Department of Planning Services' staff and the testimony heard by the Planning Commission. Motion seconded by Bud Clemons. The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Planning Commission. Discussion followed. The Chairman asked the secretary to poi' the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Ann Garrison - yes; Richard Kimmel - yes; Judy Yamaguchi - yes; LeAnn Reid - yes; Rick Iverson - yes; Jean Roffman - yes; Bud Clemons - yes; Jerry Kiefer - yes. Motion carried unanimously. CASE NL'N$£R: USA-922 APPLICANT: William Bradley Pickert and Everdina Annemarie Pickert REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review permit for a livestock confinement operation (1,000 head dairy with 6 residences) . LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part W} of Section 28, T4N, RUM of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: South of weld County Road 42, and east of and adjacent to Weld County Road 5. Qn aid.t6 • Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting August 21, 1990 Page 1C APPEARANCE: William "Brad" Pickert, property owner and applicant. "Pickert Dairy" is a family owned and operated dairy. They came here from New York and have operated the dairy at its present site for the past nine and one-half years. It has been operated as a dairy for approximately thirty-five years. They have approximately 450 head, drylot, milking herd, and calves, and are currently milking about 270 head. There are three dwellings on the property. They are enlarging only as finances allow them to, and not all at one time. He has reviewed the recommendation of the Department of Planning Services' staff and sees no problem with them. The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the audience. Tom Kelly, area farmer has objections because of the odor from an excessive number of animals concentrated in so small an area. He does not feel it is possible to control odors when there are that many animals concentrated on the property. Ronald Halverson, surrounding property owner, feels enlargement of the dairy would impact the quality of their life. Right now, Mr. Pickert runs a clean operation and is a good neighbor, but 1,000 head of cows might increase traffic, dust, and odor significantly. Dale Horning, adjacent property owner to the north, feels that betauze of the type of soils in this area, the Little Thompson is bound to be • contaminated, and there is the possibility of a decrease in property values. Keith Schuett reported Wes Potter had advised him that a slow percolation rate is an advantage in preventing contamination of surface and subsurface • water. Lee Morrison stated the soil and slope were taken into consideration and the percolation rate is an asset. Randy ?fief, adjacent property owner, also owns a dairy, but not as large. The holding pond runs over and runs onto his property. He does not object to this request, but when the holding ponds run over he objects to the possibility of seepage into the surface and underground water and the possibility of decreased property values. Dave Schwinn, surrounding property owner, feels Mr. Pickert does a good job of operating his dairy. He buys his feed largely from area farmers and he has bought hay from him. However, he is concerned about traffic, waste • management, odor, runoff, and contamination from insecticides and disinfectants. 4%CC183 Tape 367 ✓ Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting August 21, 1990 Page 11 Rachelle Landed', area resident, is concerned about odor and resale value decreasing on her property. Judy Kelly, area property owner. Her primary concerns have already been expressed, but she does not see how they can evade odor. Brad Pickert stated he understands the neighbors concerns regarding these problems. However, odor from his operation should not be of great concern. Se runs a dry operation and has no intention of changing this. There are dairies in the vicinity who run wet operations, and they do have problems with odor. Most of those speaking today, live upwind from the dairy, but his family lives in the middle of it and they do not like being surrounding by offensive odors either. This is an agricultural district and should not be urbanized. In the morning, they make approximately five round trips with feed, insilage, etc., and because of changes in operation, this should not increase much. At present the dairy supports four families and a hired awn. It should take five to eight years to reach capacity. Also, he does not feel his present lagoon was engineered, and is probably just a hole that was • dug to retain runoff. The new holding ponds will be installed exactly as recommended for soils type, slope, etc. Lee Morrison briefly reviewed Colorado law regarding runoff. • The Chairman called a break at 4:40 p.m. The meeting was reconvened at 4:45 p.m. The Chairman asked Xeith Schuett to read the recommendation of the Department of Planning Services staff into the record. MOTION: LeAnn Reid moved the Planning Commission forward Case Number CSR-922 for William Bradley Pickert and Sverdina AnnaMarie Pickert for a Site, Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a livestock confinement operation (1,000 head dairy with 6 residences) to the Board of County Commissioners with the our recommendation for approval based upon the recommendation, conditions, development standards, and additional comments prepared by the Department of Planning Services' staff, and the testimony heard by the Planning Commission. Motion seconded by Bud Clemons. The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Planning Commission. Discussion followed. The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Ann Garrison - Yes, and her reasons for voting yes are that if this is denied by us and the County Commissioners, and he has to cutback the number o2 head of cattle to come into compliance, the County would have no controls or way of governing what he does, including things the neighbors have complained about. By granting him this use by special review for nis dairy, the County will have someway of regulating the dairy and its problems. SC 0783 � . • Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting August 21, 1990 Page 12 Richard Kimmel - yes. Judy Yamaguchi - Yes. She supports what Ann just stated and, hopefully, things will work out in the neighborhood of growth over the years. Having observed the present dairy, she feels he is well aware of the road hazards, etc., and will take things into consideration as he enlarges. teAnn Reid - Yes. She was born and raised on a dairy farm and she agrees with Mr. Pickert that is its washed down wet it creates a bigger odor than if it is dry. Also, if the health department deems it necessary, they can close you down within a moments notice, and it is very hard to dispose of 50,000 gallons of milk. • • Rick Iverson - yes. Jean Hoffman - No. She has respected Mr. Pickert's presentation and his obvious respect from his neighbors and the cooperation shown in the community. She is interpreting the Comprehensive Plan of weld County as far as supporting and preserving agricultural industries to mean that continuing his operation as it is, which the neighbors have vouched they do not object to, would be supporting and preserving agricultural. She too was raised on a farm and appreciate the agricultural influence of Weld County. She is impressed with her first meeting on the Planning Commission with this classic conflict between urbanization and rural needs. She would support .the present operation of the Pickert dairy, and sees no reason why he couldn't be grandfathered in and continue this operation as it exists. She does, however, oppose the expansion based primarily on the Engineering Department comments and the other issues brought up about lagoons, seepage control, and the head per acre problem of intensity as it relates to odor and water problems. Bud Clemons - Yes, he would like tc inform the people in the audience they r may certainly appear before the Hoard of County Commissioners when this case comes before them, and if anyone of you would like a copy of the recommendations, he is sure the staff would provide a copy to them. He believes that while a thousand head of cattle is perhaps more than the acreage could facilitate, he feels it is better to have them under control than to have them out of compliance with no recourse. Therefore, by recommending the granting of the special use permit, he feels the County ' will be in a better position to enforce whatever violations there may be, • which will protect everyone to a greater extent than what is now possible. Jerry Kiefer - Yes. 0 The meeting was adjourned at 5-12 p.m. Respectfully submitted, �..1 •..L1 �CC q Bobbie Good "lent, Secretary a� : ATTENDANCE RECORD PLEASE write or print legibly your name, address and the name of the applicant or Docket # for the hearing you are attending. TODAY'S HEARINGS ARE AS FOLLOWS:: DOCKET # C.N. ,Llctd Ne 55 Lt., y J -3 r DOCKET # Lt-5 le" #1 5 O - 7 DOCKET # /PALtAl .21-n‘ 1344.11,7 a,,. /C t--r< ( "-71v�rice,L -6 /5x,c_,L� `;,--t4. 6,2 . 7 c) - :2 .2 /NAME ADDB�SS r Co' EARING A/T�TENDIN,(G� 1 L - . 3,r c te.�n 7 -", . j�f e r Cl�rr l �aGU f',t 0se . see /� /47 S. aucHHatz. � V �v�'Hrf-o L7 CsiP.C�Cr;i;�'� �GC�.�,il Cr�J ik'0R c�440EgfNI,•flM Z'A7)- WC P�'G�) C•a �, l t.4 r 1, _T.. t ..cA,.,r.'.,lv ,.,n .%) • r/ q i n�. ez7e1/642 7i _2G?91 tor(2/2 -ll-ec-,5,1/4, alS2 // PelLetici 3 3 77 z-- g`tAV a 'S- -7. ��..ye.Q en— ), l/ , 6, 7 Co to Q C( f? • C04 , il liet !/r'FFf--no, 3f /4)-e7,4- 4...- !-c,r itic.v,a .6;t9//G 04— C/:rfi%'e••, /tr" 1/1/4 ) 9 7:15-:T /'Eater Co 906.2/ itrC� C-IP-Ad2. }{ Aar2-tL.-s'5AN �3241 S. EO.7 . Si-- taQ-T ectcA.. 5,<z•c-rt. "NJ.-•-t4 / G i{Ll tf c/ GS en. rcv�'n Acjy 3CO'd8e3 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SIGN POSTING CERTIFICATE. I HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER THE PENALTIES OF PERJURY THAT THE SIGN PROVIDED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES WAS POSTED ON THE PROPERTY AT LEAST 10 DRAYS BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER'S HEARING FOR CASE # SI` A q Z Z. . THE SICK WAS POSTED BY: II 1,,O TA ; NAME OF PERSON POSTING SGN ` D 4� 1./.21/12,,bga SIGNATURE OF APPIvICAN/ OP r,o\- STATE OF COLORADO ) ) COUNTY OF WELD ) �f SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS 71 - DAY OF Q._ ..<1‘...1 \ 19c-10 . \ _ SEAL7�i NO ARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES '°n EaP'rot Fib. 13, 1993 LAST DAY TO POST SIGN IS: 19 PLANNING COMMISSION SIGN POSTING CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER THE PENALTIES OF PERJURY THAT THE SIGN PROVIDED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES WAS POSTED ON THE PROPERTY AT LEAST AA >, 10 DAYS BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING FOR CASE P V 31Z ' 9 z Z THE SIGN WAS POSTED BY: /_ rr ile j P'cke NAME OF PERSON POSTING SIGN i SIGNATURE OF APPLI `T STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. COUNTY OF WELD • ) 1'k SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS �9 DAY OF n i.,y , 194q+ 4 J, n :Th ovG�:G•'o :o „.°P coyOQ� , NOTARY PUBLI000 C �� MY COMMISSION EXPIRES My Cormwisuon Expwss Ft. in 14(n LAST DAY TO POST SIGN IS: , 19 200783 NOTICE Pursuant to the zoning laws of the State of Colorado and the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, a public hearing will be held in the Chambers of the Board o£ County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, First Floor, Greeley, Colorado, at the time specified. All persons in any manner interested in the site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit are requested to attend and may be heard. Should the applicant or any interested party desire the presence of a court reporter to make a record of the proceedings, in addition to the taped record which will be kept during the hearing, the Clerk to the Board's Office shall be advised in writing of such action at least five days prior to the hearing. The cost of engaging a court reporter shall be borne by the requeating party. BE IT ALSO KNOWN that the text and maps so certified by the Weld County Planning Commission may be examined in the office of the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners, located in the Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Third Floor, Greeley, Colorado. 1 APPLICANT DOCKET N0. 90-35 William Bradley Pickett and Everdina Ann Marie Pickert 19504 Weld County Road 5 Berthoud, Colorado 80513 DATE: August 29, 1990 TIME: 10:00 A.M. REQUEST: Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit - Livestock confinement operation (1,000 head dairy with six residences) 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the Wi of Section 28, Township 4 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: South of Weld County Road 42 and east of and adjacent to Weld County Road 5 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO BY: DONALD D. WARDEN WELD COUNTY CLERK TO THE BOARD By: Shelly Miller, Deputy DATED: August 13, 1990 PUBLISHED: August 16, 1990, in The New News 9C9C40783ry 83 • & A 1ai � C L`;`T� • '" j Van Capital CC,.,,;., Agricultural Property 3 �� 9 "9C pl�'. 2 �.Services, Inc. CLERK t„� Weld County Commissioners P.O.Box 758 Greeley,CO 80632 Certified Mail Rc: Docket No.90-35 Pickert Dairy Dear Sirs; Our company manages farmland located in the West Half of Section 28 that lies adjacent to the proposed dairy expansion. We have consulted with our landowner about the proposed dairy herd increase and would like to officially object to this expansion, We have serious concerns regarding odor,water quality and pollution and placing a very large dairy on a small tract of land. This area is too populated and the proposed site inadequate for such a large dairy. Our farm tenant,Jim Adler also objects to the proposed expansion, I am writing because it is doubtful I will be able to attend the hearing on August 29th as I will be out of town on other business. We ask that you deny the proposed change in zoning and that this dairy is not allowed to increase in size at the proposed location. Sincerely, I Curtis Talley Jr. Farm Manager cc Jim Adler :'�0783 3824 Hiyhline Canal Road P.O.Box 1302 Palisade, Colorado 81526-1302 TEL: 303464.5617 + c r7 1 • • PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS Pickert Dairy USR-922 LeAnn Reid moved the Planning Commission forward Case Number USR-922 for William Bradley Pickert and Everdina AnnaMarie Pickert for a Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a livestock confinement operation (1,000 head dairy with 6 residences) to the Board of County Commissioners with the our recommendation for approval based upon the recommendation, conditions, development standards, and additional comments prepared by the Department of Planning Services' staff, and the testimony heard by the Planning Commission. Motion seconded by Bud Clemons. Ann Garrison - Yes, and her reasons for voting yes are that if this is denied by us and the County Commissioners, and he has to cutback the number o£ head of cattle to come into compliance, the County would have no controls • or way o£ governing what he does, including things the neighbors have complained about. By granting him this use by special review for his dairy, the County will have someway of regulating the dairy and its problems. Richard Kimme , - yes. Judy Yamaguchi - Yes. She supports what Ann just stated and, hopefully, things will work out in the neighborhood of growth over the years. Having observed the present dairy, she feels he is well aware of the road hazards, etc. , and will take things into consideration as he enlarges. LeAnn Reid - Yes. She was born and raised on a dairy farm and she agrees with Mr. Pickert that if its washed down wet it creates a bigger odor than if it is dry. Also, if the health department deems 1t necessary, they can close you down within a moments notice, and it is very hard to dispose of 50,000 gallons of milk. Rick Iverson - yes. Jean Hoffman - No. She has respected Mr. Pickert's presentation and his obvious respect from his neighbors and the cooperation shown in the community. She is interpreting the Comprehensive Plan of Weld County as far as supporting and preserving agricultural industries to mean that continuing his operation as it is, which the neighbors have vouched they do not object to. would be supporting and preserving agricultural. She too was raised on a farm and appreciate the agricultural influence of Weld County. She is impressed with her first meeting on the Planning Commission with this classic conflict between urbanization and rural needs. She would support the present operation of the Pickert dairy, and sees no reason why he couldn't be grandfathered in and continue this operation as it exists. She does, however, oppose the expansion based primarily on the Engineering Department comments and the other issues brought up about lagoons, seepage control, and the head per acre problem o£ intensity as it relates to odor and water problems. akr 6,(.4 9'C10783 • • Planning Commission Comments Pickert Dairy USR-922 Page 2 Bud Clemons - Yes, he would like to inform the people in the audience they may certainly appear before the Board of County Commissioners when this case comes before them, and if anyone of you would like a copy of the recommendations, he is sure the staff would provide a copy to them. Be believes that while a thousand head of cattle 1s perhaps more than the acreage could facilitate, he feels it is better to have them under control than to have them out of compliance with no recourse. Therefore, by recommending the granting of the special use permit, he feels the County will be in a better position to enforce whatever violations there may be, which will protect everyone to a greater extent than what is now possible. Jerry Kiefer - Yes. ICC783 ® ® o WELD COU,:ry cotk.-rs^,m,., f220 Ili; 22 PM 3 34 c BEFORE THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, PLANNING COMtOs, eoARD RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Moved by LeAnn Reid that the following resolution be introduced for passage by the Weld County Planning Commission. Be it Resolved by the Weld County Planning Commission that the application for: CASE NUMBER: USR-922 NAME: William Bradley Pickert and Everdina AnnaMarie Pickert ADDRESS: 19504 Weld County Road 5, Berthoud, CO 80513 REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a Livestock Confinement Operation (1,000 head dairy with up to 6 dwellings) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the W1 of Section 28, T4N, R68W o£ the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: South o£ Weld County Road 42 and east of and adjacent to Weld County Road 5 / be recommended favorably to the Board of County Commissioners for the C following reasons. 1. The submitted materials are in compliance with the application requirements of Section 24.7 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 2. It is the opinion of the Weld County Planning Commission that the applicant has shown compliance with Section 24.3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: - The proposal is consistent with the intent of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan Agricultural Goals and Policies are intended to support and preserve agricultural industries and farming. - The proposed use is a livestock confinement operation and is provided for as a use by special review in the Agricultural zone district. - The uses permitted will be compatible with the existing surrounding land uses and with the future development of the surrounding area as permitted by the Agricultural zone district. The surrounding land uses include agricultural product!an, dairy operation, and rural residences. - No overlay districts affect the site. - Special Review permit Development Standards will provide adequate protection of the health, safety, and welf rs,94, neighborhood and County. .� d USR-922 William Bradley and Everdina AnnaMarie Pickert Page 2 This recommendation is based, in part, upon a review of the application materials submitted by the applicant, other relevant information regarding the request, and responses from referral entities which have reviewed this request. The Planning Commission's recommendation for approval is conditional upon the following: 1. The attached Development Standards for the Special Review permit shall be adopted and placed on the Special Review plat prior to recording the plat. The plat shall le delivered to the Department of Planning Services and be ready for recording in the Weld County Clerk and Recorder's office within 15-days of approval by the Board of County Commissioners. 2. The Special Review activity shall not occur nor shall any building or electrical permits be issued on the property until the Special Review plat is ready to be recorded in the office o£ the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. 3. Prior to recording, the Special Review plat shall be amended to show the lagoon berm 50-feet from the centerline of Weld County Road 5. 4. Within 30 days of approval by the Board of County Commissioners, an ISDS evaluation on all septic systems shall be completed prior to issuing the required septic permits on all existing systems. Motion seconded by Bud Clemons. VOTE: For Passage Against Passage Ann Garrison Jean Hoffman Richard Kimmel Judy Yamaguchi LeAnn Reid Rick Iverson Bud Clemons Jerry Kiefer The Chairman declared the resolution passed and ordered that a certified copy be forwarded with the file of this case to the Board of County Commissioners for further proceedings. STC';83 ® • USR-922 William Bradley and Everdina AnnaMarie Pickert Page 3 CERTIFICATION OF COPY I, Bobbie Good. Recording Secretary of the Weld County Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution is a true copy of the Resolution of the Planning Commission of Weld County, Colorado, adopted on August 21, 1990, and recorded in Book No. %III o£ the proceedings of the Planning Commission. Dated the 22nd of August, 1990. C`roc\\. Bobbie Good Secretary 2C C783 • • SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS William Bradley Pickett and Everdina AnnaMarie Pickett L'SR-922 1. The Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review permit is for a livestock confinement operation (1,000 head dairy with up to 6 dwellings) as submitted in the application materials on file in the Department of Planning Services and subject to the Development Standards stated hereon. 2. Approval of this plan may create a vested property right pursuant to Article 68 0£ Title 24 C.R.S., as amended. 3. The applicant shall remove, handle, and stockpile manure from the livestock confinement area in a manner that will prevent nuisance conditions. The manure piles shall not be allowed to exist or deteriorate to a condition that facilitates excessive odors, flies or insect pests, or pollutant runoff. The manure storage site shall have a water-tight surface which does not permit seepage or percolation of mature pollutants into the ground. 4. The facility shall be in compliance at all times with the State Health o Department Regulations, Colorado Guidelines for Feedlot Runoff Containment. 5. The applicant shall comply with all State Health Department requirements for construction and operation of a dairy. Waste disposal retention and containment facilities shall be reviewed and approved by the Weld County Health Department and constructed in compliance with State Statutes. 6. Waste oil, waste paints, stains, treatments, spent drug containers, empty livestock dip containers, anti-freeze, and other associated liquid and solid wastes shall be stored and removed for final disposal in a manner that protects against surface and groundwater contamination. 7. No permanent disposal of wastes shall be permitted at this site. 8. Wood shavings, sawdust, and waste materials shall be handled, stored, and disposed of in a manner that controls fugitive dust. blowing debris, and other potential nuisance conditions. 9. Fugitive dust shall be controlled on this site. a. 0'783 • • Development Standards USR-922 Page 2 10. Runoff from the livestock confinement operation shall be contained on site. 11. All construction on the property shall be in accordance with the requirements of the Weld County Building Code Ordinance. 12. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Design Standards of Section 24.5 of the weld County Zoning Ordinance. 13. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Operation Standards of Section 24.6 0£ the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 14. Personnel from the State Health Department the Weld County Health Department and Weld County Department of Planning Services shall be granted access onto the property at any reasonable time in order to ensure the activities carried out on the property comply with the Development Standards stated hereon and all applicable Weld County Regulations. 15 The Special Review area shall be limited to the plans shown hereon and governed by the foregoing Standards and all applicable Weld County Regulations. Major changes from the plans or Development Standards as shown or stated shall require the approval of an amendment of the Permit by the Weld County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners before such changes from the plans or Development Standards are permitted. Any other changes shall be filed in the office of the Department of Planning Services. 16. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with all of the foregoing Development Standards. Noncompliance with any of the foregoing Development Standards may be reason for revocation of the Permit by the Board of County Commissioners. 90O733 INVElliRY OF ITEMS SUBMITTED FOR CONSIIIRATION Case Number USR-922 Submitted or Prepared Prior to Hearin At Hearing 1. Application 27 Pages X 2. One application plat(s) one page(s) X 3. DPS Referral Summary Sheet X 4. DPS Recommendation X 5. DPS Surrounding Property Owner's Mailing List X 6. DPS Mineral Owner's Mailing List X 7. Two DPS Naps Prepared by Planning Technician X 8. DPS Notice o£ Hearing X 9. DPS Case File Summary Sheet X 10. DPS Field Check X 11. Memo dated August 3, 1990, from Wes Potter, X Weld County Health Department 12. Memo dated July 26, 1990, from Don Carroll, X Weld County Engineering Department 13. Referral response dated July 25, 1990, from X Ed Herring, Weld County Sheriff's Department/ Office of Emergency Management 14. Referral response dated July 30, 1990, from X Stephen Charles, Berthoud FPD 15. Memo dated August 21. 1990, from Gene %lose, X Weld County Extension Service 16. Referral response dated July 26, 1990, from X Louis Bein, Starbird Ditch Company 17. Memo dated July 18, 1990. from Judy Schmidt, X Environmental Health 18. Letter dated August 20. 1990, from Big Thompson X Soil Conservation District 19. Letter dated august. 1990, from C.L. Cantrell X 20. Board of County Commissioners Resolution for X preadvertising 21. Notice for Board of County Commissioners Hearing X I hereby certify that the 21 items identified herein were submitted to the Department of Planning Services at or prior to the scheduled Planning Commission hearing. I further certify that these items were forwarded to the Clerk to the Board's office on August 22, 1990.E Sea Current claimer STATE OF COLORADO ) .irk G ) COUNT**:DO ELD ) V.OW pp CR'p IVOAirD SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS 22 a day of (N,.a_cvA4ti rtie \C'f o1) 9fAS1NNZL ' NOTgRY PUBLIC O e ( 0�',: My Commission Expires MY tXpOPPIOYW& re Iry .9(0783 my class. T3, 1993 �klu bi • • RESOLUTION RE: GRANT REQUEST OF PICKERT DAIRY TO PREADVERTISE SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT APPLICATION WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, Brad Pickert, from Pickert Dairy, has submitted a letter to the Board requesting that the Special Review Permit application be preadvertised, and WHEREAS, a copy of said letter of request is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and WHEREAS, after review, the Board deems it appropriate to grant said request to preadvertise this matter. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the request o£ Brad Pickert, from Pickert Dairy, to preadvertise the Special Review Permit application be, and hereby is, granted. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that the hearing date to • consider said Special Review Permit application be set for August 29, 1990, at 10 :00 A.M. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 13th day of August, A.D. , 1990. �// // BOA OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: • ea WE OUNTY, COLORADO Weld County Clerk to the BoardikkeK e R. Brant er, Chairman ��- -rA 0 /-` �/�' 'Geo a Kenne y, Pro-TemDeputy Clerk tothe Board �crede-a44.04 APPROVED AS TO FORM: onstance ''L//. Harbert t K` tai C. . i fir_-y..� / � ' ' l �-�-r=� L N-frcW County Attorney a �J ../C0783 • ExA(We 8 (/ 900737 Nob / 0 tst;.. MEMORAn®UM WINGTo Board oweMigust 1_,3, 1990 COLORADO From Clerk to the Board subject: Request for preadvertisement of USR Brad Pickert, from Pickerts Dairy, has submitted a request that their Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit application be preadvertised. This matter will be considered by the Planning Commission on August 21, 1990. They have requested a hearing before the Board on August 29. If you wish to approve their request, the date they have speci_ied will allow adequate time for advertising. Thank you, SV 783 A00737 e a 41 • July 25, 1990 Berthoud, co. Weld County Planning Services Mr. Keith Schuett Planner 915 10th Street Greeley, Co. 80631 Dear Keith, In order to facilitate speedy processing of the submitted special use request for Pickerts Dairy, I would like to request pre-advertising before the County Commisloners meeting. I am willing to pay this cost. The reasons for needing speedy approval are; We have applied for a Federal Land Bank loan on the real estate to lower our interest cost and to finance some much needed improvements that • we have planned on doing this summer. This loan approval is now stalled because of the unexpected request of the planning department that we must have a special use permit . Also, my son Scott who is a partner in the business, would like to have his newly acquired double wide home moved onto the property before the weather gets bad and to eliminate the $165.00 a month fee he now pays for rent in a distant trailer park. Thank you for your consideration of this request. S ncerly 6.41.11/4-Zi Brad Plckert ;U �r 231- 1 77; r.i ' iUl 2 �6 1993 WM Co. Rofouw ;om ossito SC0783 San" b r. A/�, EXHIBIT INVENTORY CONTROL SHEET Case U.5,- &hint �CS/QIJu Exhibit Submitted By 0 Exhibit Description S lot A. shad et? EtA t / iri Mt f ghP&di/VA 13,e CAB. (1,IA k 6 goaAa A'to mitf t.,;J �,��z /aface Sla c. Se a Aand yo tiAl ) thaAxlizt SIB E. 841 F. 8A Ant-MIA1-1 degieziti, ) . &At, Japho , (ttt„, � U � I. J. R. L. M. N. StC7 3 0. (TM/ DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE(303)358-4000,EXT.4400 i 91510th STREET wiipe GREELEY.COLORADO 80631 • • COLORADO NOTICE OF PUBLIC BEARING The Weld County Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, August 21, 1990, at 1:30 p.m, for the puzpose of considering a Site Specific Development Plan and a Site Review permit for the property described below. Approval of the request may create a vested property right pursuant to Colorado Law. APPLICANT: william Bradley Picker}and Everdina Ann Marie Pickert LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the w1 of Section 28, T4N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado TYPE AND INTENSITY OP PROPOSED USE: Livestock confinement operation (1,000 head dairy' with six residences) . LOCATION: South of Weld County Road 42 and east of and adjacent to weld County Road 5. SIZE: 47 acres, more or less The public hearing will be held in the Weld County Commissioners' Bearing Room, First Floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado. Comments or objections related to the above request should be submitted in writing to the Weld County Department of Planning Services, 915 Tenth Street, Room 342, Greeley, Colorado 80631, before the above date or presented at the public hearing on August 21, 1990. Copies of the application are available for public inspection in the Department of Planning Services, Room 342, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado 80631 - Phone - 356-4000, Extension 4400. Ernie Ross, Chairman Weld County Planning Commission To be published in the New News To be published one (1) ti��m��ee/ by August 2, 1990 Received^ by: ,z),, Date: /G ? 7 � /F2a SC0?,83 August 21, 1990 CASE NUMBER: USR-922 NAME: William Bradley Pickert and Everdina AnnaMarie Pickert ADDRESS: 19504 Weld County Road 5, Berthoud, CO 80513 REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a Livestock Confinement Operation (1,000 head dairy with up to 6 dwellings) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the WAS of Section 28, T4N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: South of Weld County Road 42 and east of and adjacent to Weld County Road 5 TEE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES' STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THIS REQUEST BE APPROVED FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: 1. The submitted materials are in compliance with the application requirements of Section 24.7 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 2. It is the opinion of the Department of Planning Services' staff that the applicant has shown compliance with Section 24.3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: - The proposal is consistent with the intent of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan Agricultural Goals and Policies are intended to support and preserve agricultural industries and farming. - The proposed use is a livestock confinement operation and is provided for as a use by special review in the Agricultural zone district. - The uses permitted will be compatible with the existing surrounding land uses and with the future development of the surrounding area as permitted by the Agricultural zone district. The surrounding land uses include agricultural production, dairy operation, and rural residences. - No overlay districts affect the site. - Special Review permit Development Standards will provide adequate protection of the health, safety, and welfare of the neighborhood and County. This recommendation is based, in part, upon a review of the application materials submitted by the applicant, other relevant information regarding the request, and responses from referral entities which have reviewed this request. SC0783 • • USR-922 William Bradley and Everdina AnnaMarie Pickert Page 2 The Department of Planning Services' staff recommendation for approval is conditional upon the following: 1. The attached Development Standards for the Special Review permit shall be adopted and placed on the Special Review plat prior to recording the plat. The plat shall be delivered to the Department of Planning Services and be ready for recording in the Weld County Clerk and Recorder's office within 15-days of approval by the Board of County Commissioners. 2. The Special Review activity shall not occur nor shall any building or electrical permits be issued on the property until the Special Review plat is ready to be recorded is the office of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. 3. Prior to recording, the Special Review plat shall be amended to show the lagoon berm 50-feet from the centerline of Weld County Road 5. 4. Within 30 days of approval by the Board of County Commissioners, an ISDS evaluation on all septic systems shall be completed prior to issuing the required septic permits on all existing systems. 90O783 • • SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS William Bradley Pickert and Everdina AnnaMarie Pickert USR-922 1. The Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review permit is for a livestock confinement operation (1,000 head dairy with up to 6 dwellings) as submitted in the application materials on file in the Department of Planning Services and subject to the Development Standards stated hereon. 2. Approval of this plan may create a vested property right pursuant to Article 68 of Title 24 C.R.S., as amended. 3. The applicant shall remove, handle, and stockpile manure from the livestock confinement area in a manner that will prevent nuisance conditions. The manure piles shall not be allowed to exist or deteriorate to a condition that facilitates excessive odors, flies or insect pests, or pollutant runoff. The manure storage site shall have a water-tight surface which does not permit seepage or percolation of manure pollutants into the ground. 4. The facility shall be in compliance at all times with the State Health Department Regulations, Colorado Guidelines for Feedlot Runoff_ Containment. 5. The applicant shall comply with all State Health Department requirements for construction and operation of a dairy. Waste disposal retention and containment facilities shall be reviewed and approved by the Weld County Health Department and constructed in compliance with CState Statutes. 6. Waste oil, waste paints, stains, treatments, spent drug containers, empty livestock dip containers, anti-freeze, and other associated liquid and solid wastes shall be stored and removed for final disposal in a manner that protects against surface and groundwater contamination. 7. No permanent disposal of wastes shall be permitted at this site. 8. Wood shavings, sawdust, and waste materials shall be bandied, stored, and disposed of in a manner that controls fugitive dust, blowing debris, and other potential nuisance conditions. 9. Fugitive dust shall be controlled on this site. 000 S$y3 • • Development Standards USR-922 Page 2 10. Runoff from the livestock confinement operation shall be contained on site. 11. All construction on the property shall be in accordance with the requirements of the Weld County Building Code Ordinance. 12. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Design Standards of Section 24.5 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 13. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Operation Standards of Section 24.6 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 14. Personnel from the State Health Department the Weld County Health Department and Weld County Department of Planning Services shall be granted access onto the property at any reasonable time in order to ensure the activities carried out on the property comply with the Development Standards stated hereon and all applicable Weld County Regulations. 15 The Special Review area shall be limited to the plans shown hereon and governed by the foregoing Standards and all applicable Weld County Regulations. Major changes from the plans or Development Standards as shown or stated shall require the approval of an amendment of the Permit by the Weld County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners before such changes from the plans or Development Standards are permitted. Any other changes shall be filed in the office of the Department of Planning Services. 16. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with all of the foregoing Development Standards. Noncompliance with any of the foregoing Development Standards may be reason for revocation of the Permit by the Board of County Commissioners. ✓QC6783 ® • f./ truei AUG 1 7 1990 Li RESOLUTION Ne16 Co. Olarrnor a RE: GRANT REQUEST OF PICMERT DAIRY TO PREADVERTISE SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT APPLICATION WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, Brad Pickert, tram Pickert Dairy, has submitted a letter to the Board requesting that the Special Review Permit application be preadvertised, and WHEREAS, a copy of said letter of request is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and wHEREAS, after review, the Board deems it appropriate to grant said request to preadvertise this matter. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the request of Brad Pickert, from Pickert Dairy, to preadvertise the Special Review . Permit application be, and hereby is, granted. BE IT kuexueR RESOLVED by the Board that the hearing date to consider said Special Review Permit application be set for August 29, 1990, at 10:00 A.M. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 13th day of August, A.D. , 1990. BO OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: Pa OUNTY, COLORADO �/weld County Clerk to the Board tin/ �� e R. Bran r, rman Cilel0W-y yGeo a Renne y, Pro-Tem puty Clerk to(e.‘frac-scif--I Board dastattg APPROVED AS TO FORM: nstancle L. Harbert Zcc ,- C.W.'ASI 3/ �.•-- �/ � fp��_ ' Attorzse Gordon E. Lacy F.A.ti783 900737 77 e" "'r , • • NOTICE Pursuant to the zoning laws of the State of Colorado and the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, a public hearing will be held in the Chambers of the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, First Floor, Greeley, Colorado, at the time specified. All persons in any manner interested in the Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit are requested to attend and may be heard. Should the applicant or any interested party desire the presence of a court reporter to make a record of the proceedings, in addition to the taped record which will be kept during the hearing, the Clerk to the Board's Office shall be advised in writing of such action at least five days prior to the hearing. The cost of engaging a court reporter shall be borne by the requesting party. BE IT ALSO KNOWN that the text and maps so certified by the Weld County Planning Commission may be examined in the office of the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners, located in the Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Third Floor, Greeley, Colorado. APPLICANT DOCKET N0. 90-35 William Bradley Pickort and Everdina Ann Marie Pickert 19504 Weld County Road 5 Berthoud, Colorado 80513 DATE: August 29, 1990 TIME: 10:00 A.M. REQUEST: Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit - Livestock confinement operation (1,000 head dairy with six residences) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the W3 of Section 28, Township 4 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: South of Weld County Road 42 and east of and adjacent to Weld County Road 5 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO BY: DONALD D. WARDEN WELD COUNTY CLERK TO THE BOARD .9C C783 BY: Shelly Miller, Deputy DATED: August 13, 1990 0 T P22_1,07C PUBLISHED:August 16,_990,in The New News Q�G'3 tp� �7V Weld Ca Plasm Coo • s August 1990 To whom it may concern; I am very opposed to the Pikerts request for 1,000 head of cattle and 3 more residences. That would give us not only an extremely odorous "feed lot" but also a trailer park. Please! ! Give us a break out here. Their dairy farm is not way out away from civilization where only they have to deal with the odors of 1,000 head of cattle. There are other homes in the area--some of them rather close. This is not the place for this kind of operation. They have been out of compliance for years with the number of head they run. Why should they now be rewarded with anything they ask £or? What • makes you think that they would now comply with new requirements and keep only 1,000? With there past track record there'll be 1,500 head on their 35 acres. They use a county road between their pits and where the cattle are which requires many trips back and forth daily. If they are permitted to have 3 times as many head then simple math would suggest that would increase those trips by 3! ! It would mean triple the large truck loads of hay, triple the hay grinding which creates an awful green cloud of dust into the air and also triple the trucks hauling off the manure. Add this additional traffic and 2 more autos for each of 3 more residences with all the added dust in the air from the dirty, dusty roads which residents of Weld County must deal with. THIS IS NOT ACCEPTABLE! Please give us mercy. Apparently they told neighbors that they do not intend to run 1,000 head but as a matter of principle are asking for the maximum. Why • do this? Could it be to keep neighbors from protesting? If they want 300, 400, 500 let their request be for what they really want. If they get their permit for 1,000 then in the future either they or someone that they might sell to could without futher conversation or how many changes might have occurred put 1,000 head on this land. Neither Pikerts or anyone they might sell to should be allowed to have that many head of cattle, and 3 more trailers on this property. Take a look for yourselves. Too many cows, too many flies, too many ODORS, too much traffic, too much dust, too much manure, and too many trailers! ! ! It doesn't seem fair that there is no requirement that a sign be posted on the site of the proposed change. Apparently people who live close received evkataradorti some sort o£ notice by mail, but those of us •• who live farther away happen to find°out through the grapevine. I'm sure you have regulations but some of us who live in the area but not next door would like to know what's going on. oC 078x3 Oen aft' pi5-R.53.w. AUG 21 1990 Weld Ca. Pbsi Met COMBSOOD • • BIG THOMPSON SOIL CONSERVATION DISTRICT P.O. 7186 Loveland, Colorado 80537 August 20, 1990 Weld County Department of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley , CO 80631 Kieth Schuett . Planner : We understand from Frank Riggle of the Soil Conservation Service , that there has been some confusion regarding the requested review of the Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit for the Bradley Pickett and Everdina Anna Marie Pickett 1000 head dairy , Case Number USR-922. The Big Thompson Soil Conservation District Board of Supervisors reviewed the proposal at their regular board meeting on August 7, 1990. The supervisors present had no particular comments, however there were not enough members present to have a quorum. Any large-scale livestock confinement operation can present possible erosion and waste runoff problems. This project is too large an operation for the local Soil Conservation Service office to assist with the design of a waste managment system. The Board would suggest that Weld County Planning or Weld County Health determine if an adequate waste management and runoff management system needs to be developed to control possible offsite problems . Since the scope of the project is beyond the job approval authority for the local SCS office, and there was not a quorum present at the meeting, the Big Thompson Soil Conservation District has no comments about the project at this time. Sincerely , Big Thompson Soil Conservation District Board of Supervisors l( AUG 2 , 1990 il J lF_ wets co. 91-ophi w, .....IMati. • • LAND-USE APPLICATION SUMMARY SHEET Date: August 14. 1990 CASE NUMBER: USA-922 NAME: William Bradley Pickert and Everdina Anna Marie Pickert ADDRESS: 19504 Weld County Road 5, Berthoud, CO 80513 REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review permit for a livestock confinement operation (1.000 bead dairy with up to six residences). LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part o£ the A of Section 28, T4N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: South of Weld County Road 42 and east of and adjacent to Weld County Road 5. SIZE OF PARCEL: 47 Acres, = POSSIBLE ISSUES SUMMARIZED FROM APPLICATION MATERIALS: The criteria for review of this Special Review permit is listed in Section 24.3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. The Department of Planning Services' staff has received specific recommendations from the Weld County Health Department and the Weld County Engineering Department. Referral responses have not been received from the State Health Deparemen No objections have been received by Department of Planning Services' staff from surrounding property owners. SC07, 83 (to... cc , :zi ts;Ekr„rte. m . J ' > •r �,> 58 rox.u.r. � ^ � N.. ..• •.•rn•.Y ♦�• V , a ,M l � r •.o .p, V 56•.••�5 � ...%:\ t �, i1:L.,1„,a. v.. ..:14_1/2\:::: :%:, 0 l . Acta none 1 `.7wr U " ©mill 9 ._. 1 • .. �+, i Z ••' ,'• " ..la.W II d as 'Matte ';. . 4"E. zallt "� t ... •J%_ •.44 • otimIts en •g• •r'S ..• 1 , . 5. .(tii da ___leapie sla • cc , a;. , .4,O 1 ,,,. .i . • • R(y� ra I . _ • • • t ..� III 1 4 ,• ;r � • , • 4* I ..f.-4 » f es lnii,-..,....v9,--••••••--.1 . 4 I Illillitt WS"' gie all ii;:W. IS InIONSA V • I. . :Wee s. :e t in: IMI :it I . :A NM . »cep _ 3T • d > ai 3 r ' I. 10 . .,xr u `4! d.. lot. '• _ .n. ,�� +l. os . .._ 1 : • n a // v +\ T6 *►�' fralr r7 , t 'VA r �• • - Y•Q: • a.. •i �II =., •• etKR � a.. * ` iimg ' ''.3 • .ter -�-� t-, ` f,F - - 20 .. "�T2Ja » all - . . .I, , c 28,e �. IS r 'J I� li • f II .o t. L II X t, c u y -:77,;46r G •� ` �. r • ",..•- a • e •,r.g ra�Jx•�'�..- 1 < _ _ - _ - ___ -116 9�,/ 1"'M ikizr y•v 2.. I `vI I CI O rgr / ,- � ,-- ::\' ef.7 4Y]6 3 .� a95�� -• j.i �� p. l" ��• �� •y a PTO / 1 I! J/�. I ,i v - 21 e �- i -'— , ;� � ��/v/ �/ / ��"V/ /1 �.-� ti�o��``• 4.i. .---k..,, i,Ne r-----"-- el ,� -1.1)-95Thtfir , �C l - _ ..�.__._F•- i r`\ �`+�.1 an b n J � I ��`V' r�I, :5 ?ertip's � f` •._...-.1/4_,Ic' j ' \.. r�� 1, ; -� 1),--i / �. �L/ I I • •, �° 969 .__ ��' ��, 1 \.-'"• .---------•`••,,, 1%)c:ilf `\\ � _.�� o ,� S• �r: (-) it-) �J ^ I. v; y 1 `9re" t\ 4 `� eon •y5 A y, J W , l Vp 00 ` � ,: \ m 3 7\ • s r 5150 � P\ r/-tn\ i,„11,4,1. '(K\ ''' r---'----_,-.2-_,-'"":"."--joi II G3 iz,' ) e ( \ , so ' 3050 -(e-1Th fn Yi V ` , �...�•.. �� '°O 6019 • � C `1 . FIELD CHECK FILING NUMBER: USR-922 DATE OF INSPECTION: August 6. 1990 NAME: William Bradley Pickert REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and Special Reviev permit for a livestock confinement facility (1,000 dairy with up to 6 residences). LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the Wk of Section 28, T4N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County. Colorado LOCATION: South of Weld County Road 42 and east of and adjacent to Weld County Road 5. LAND USE: N Farm production E Irrigation ditch, farm production S Farm production W Weld County Road 5, rural residence. farm production. and dairy ZONING: N A (Agricultural) E A (Agricultural) S A (Agricultural) W A (Agricultural) COMMENTS: An existing dairy operation is located on the property with dairy barn, corrals, tvo mobile homes, and one dwelling as shown on the Special Review plat. The property slopes from he east down to the west. Access to the property is off Weld County Road 5, a gravel county local. By: e e . Schue-tt Current Planner eC07 32; • FIELD CHECK da Filing Number: USR-922 Date of Inspection:( `/ir° Current Planner: Keith A. Schuett Applicant's Name: William Bradley Pickerland Everdina Anna Marie Pickett Request: Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review permit for a livestock confinement operation (1,000 head dairy). Legal Description: Part of t)..01 Wei of Section 28, T4N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado Location: South of Weld County Road 42 and east of and adjacent to Weld County Road 5. jl. i Land Use: N Q`l E 11 L 'p h gnXnt 4 Snal RA Zoning: N A (Agricultural) E A (Agricultural) S A (Agricultural) W A (Agricultural) COMMENTS: Cr Prategi A1}f„ Qn'�^/1� \f‘u, Q LCAAAA. :trg. —Pa R-41, ‘i\k - ` r)2- WNW Ctrenb1 g U90. deeecl szt E Y f2 C �\ - � ,SLR 4l` Z " F 9- WC g s1re -rie (259 wG"% si tore of schartmembir I*CR 5 �ll 9C 0783 REFERRAL LIST NAME: William Bradley Pickert CASE NUMBER: USR-922 REFERRALS SENT: July 24, 1990 REFERRALS TO BE RECEIVED BY: August 7, 1990 ` COUNTY TOWNS and CITIES Attorney _Ault -0-Health Department _Brighton Extension Service Dacoao x Emergency Management Office - Eaton Sheriff's Office - Erie r7X Engineering �_EVAAS _Housing Authority _Firestone _Airport Authority _Fort Lupton Building Inspection Frederick '-"- Garden City STATE Gilcrest Highway Department +_Johnstown -- --Historical Society ----Johnstown water Conservation Board Kersey and Gas Conservation Commission La Salle Lochbuie FIRE DISTRICTS _Longmont _,Ault F-1 Mead v X Berthoud F-2 Milliken Brighton F-3 New Raymer Bacon F-19 Nunn Eaton F-4 Platteville M-Fort Lupton F-5 _Severance �Galeton F-6 _^Windsor Hudson F-7 ^Johnstown F-8 COUNTIES ----La Salle F-9 Adams Longmont F-10 rBoulder - Milliken F-11 �Larimer -- --Nunn F-12 Pawnee Platteville F-13 FEDERAL GOVERHImENT AGENCIES Platte Valley F-14 �US Army Corps of Engineers • OTHER X Colorado Department Of Health Dan Trimberger 4210 East 11th Avenue Denver, CO 80220 SOIL CONSERVATION DISTRICTS Brighton /X Starbird Ditch X Fort Collins —mac/o Mr. Louis Bein ----LOngmont P.O. Box 1079 west Adams Berthoud, CO 80513 COMMISSION/BOARD MEMBER p/rX Judith Yamaguchi 990 G 8 Q^^ r�Q 3 • • 5.(i‘tir 101 MEMC)RA(1DUM Keith A. t To Weld County Planning Oat* August 3, 1990 COLORADO From Wes Potter, Director, Environmental Protection Services Case Number: USR-922 Name: Pickett, William Bradley sub}«t: Environmental Protection Services has reviewed this proposal and recommends for approval, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall remove, handle, and stockpile manure from the livestock confinement area in a manner that will prevent nuisance conditions. The manure piles shall not be allowed to exist or deteriorate to a condition that facilitates excessive odors, flies, or insect pests, or pollutant runoff. The manure storage site shall have a water-tight surface which does not permit seepage or percolation of manure pollutants into the ground. 2. The facility shall be in compliance with the Colorado Guidelines for Feedlot Runoff Containment Plan as approved by the Weld County Health Department in July of 1990. 3. Applicant shall comply with all State Health Department requirements for construction and operation of a dairy. Waste disposal retention and containment facilities shall be reviewed and approved by the Weld County Health Department, and constructed in compliance with state statutes. 4. Waste oil, waste paints, stains, treatments, spent drug containers empty livestock dip containers, anti-freeze, and other associated liquid and solid wastes, shall be stored and removed for final disposal in a manner that protects against surface and groundwater contamination. 5. No permanent disposal of wastes shall be permitted at this site. 6. An I.S.D.S. Evaluation on all existing septic systems will be necessary, prior to issuing the required septic permits on the existing systems. 7. Wood shavings, saw dust, and waste materials shall be handled, stored, and disposed in a manner that controls fugitive dust, blowing debris, and other potential nuisance conditions. 8. Fugitive dust must be controlled on this site. _ 15!) C\ ‘nal WP560/dgc , AUG 6 1990 Weld Co. Plrm:me owniz a'cipe \ ® O T Alt MEMORAnDUM Wier M Ronald Carroll, Administrative Manager, Engineering Dept. tyre COLORADO From Site Plan - William Bradley Picker, USR-922 Subject: The only concern I have is regarding the lagoon area. What is the distance of the lagoon from the right-of-way? Will the run-off water be contained, or will it run into the borrow ditch on County right-of-way? I pp,(P/ LW, I Li_IIll 2 7 1990 I Wog Co otooloi DC/mw:prwest cc: Commissioner Kirby Planning Referral File - William Bradley Picker, USR-922 �f.C—'F.3 R • ti • • Agenda Date: August 21, 1990 Applicant's Name: William Bradley Pickert and Everdina Anna Marie P:.ckert Location: South of Weld County Road 42 and east of and adjacent to weld County Road 5. Legal Description: Part of the WA, of Suction 28, T:N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado Type of Operation: Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a livestock confinement operation (1,000 head dairy) . Comments: 4 Atter //21-ei--• terwee----1 dat raj• 4t*/ .r.QJ ryte.."��21i� /, Weld County Extension Service 2083 • 6 Ed Berri. Office of Emergency Management at" v" n,,,,r��w , Vr" rV1�YIY nVV JGf1Y tVC.7 kt: PHONE(909)956.4000,EXT.4400 91510th STREET GREELEY,COLORADO 80691 C. CASE NDMBER OSR-922 COLORADO July 24, 1990 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from William Bradley Picker and Everdina Anna Maxie Picker for a Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a livestock confinement operation (1,000 head dairy) . The parcel of land is described as part of the Wh of Section 28, T4N, R68w of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel o£ land for which this application has been submitted is south of Weld County Road 42 and east of and adjacent to Weld County Road S. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recordation. Please reply by August 7, 1990, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Keith A. Schuett, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it �- does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan far the rio following reasons. �. e- � art 0 SLI v 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this t_eques (is/is not) compatible with the interests tit! :ou25 town for the following reasons: 3. ; We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Signed: Agency: toC St1/4 ✓/ i� f Date: D 7 Z rye" 900783 (� • • DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES \ PNONE(303)Z...4000,i6.4000,Ea.4400 91510th STREET GREELEY,COLORADO ecci wiipe CASE NUMBER USR-922 COLORADO July 24, 1990 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from William Bradley Picker and Everdina Anna Marie Picker for a Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a livestock confinement operation (1,000 head dairy). The parcel of land is described as part of the WAa of Section 28, T4N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is south of weld County Road 42 and east of and adjacent to Weld County Road 5. - This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request, would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by August 7, 1990, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Keith A. Schuette Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. D 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel thiswLequest .747.% (is/is not) compatible with the interests?of og town for the following reasons: g 3. S We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts X61+• o� interests. r----::3 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Please refer o the enclosed letter. /J Signed: j i L Agency: 7Z2 .4a74 Date: /.igk,/,0 BIC078 y. DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES IrCH1 PHONE(303)3564000,EXT.4f00 ip 9131otA STREET GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 Ille NUMBER COLORADO IISR-922 July 24, 1990 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from William Bradley Picker and Everdina Anna Marie Picker for a Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a livestock confinement operation (1,000 head dairy). The parcel of land is described as part of the W1 of Section 28, T4N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is south of Weld County Road 42 and east of and adjacent to Weld County Road 5. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by August 7, 1990, so that we may give full consideration to yOUr recommendation. Please call Keith A. Schuett, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed abola�. 0 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it �. ? does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive PlanPlan triheg; a) following reasons. s ii - C—I 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this raquest� (is/is not) compatible with the interests 40 ur__,.4.i town for the following reasons: ' / sJ 3. ✓ We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts wish oux interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Ple efer to the enclosed tier. /f� Signed: Agency: 'yea. /N'Ake" � !7 • Date: 1r 2` —(n'• 7CIe `f ‘140J L! ) A, /moo. .)C 0783 r . • • MEMORAi1®UM Keith Schuett 7p Veld County Planning July 18, 1990 Date COLORADO FrontEnvironmental Protection Services 92`�ipanteQ/�. Brad Pickert Dairy Farm �f Subject. The Division has reviewed and evaluated the site of the proposed dairy expansion located at 19504 VCR 5. The design as follows appears to be adequate and in compliance with the Colorado Guidelines for Feedlot Runoff Containment. JS522/dgc Enclosures ti EX C 7R3 o ?(- 5745-ti,cct‘lt JUL 2 199u..._• tie to, ,` , • • I0 1 ' , i rfi-.1 0_5 'el i0o0aN . _Lsv y w c 2 s • - - 2< r-__± I. v u LCD tU�S - (7 , . - _..... - Y -"n" S•Q �� . iI . ` '' �; • 3.b . T/vs.oh S lope 2- / III „. . ), Pis. ! 1grc - �ogrcf f.', 160 L. os a f e el S W C.6 1••• Ake r- a f r o poi-Iv• . i s 2 `a1 ,I 1 I .1 • ,f1 /////A N:f Yl • --(22cGZs •d 4 a. I X / 7 s /s 7_2 s 40 Fr' S?a X . l 7 S - /y, D c) ° U iy 006 80 17 S i 12 s 1I 1 1 � C J� 7 3 5--,"aa - 3S" j7 � � 337 • / 3 / X70 5 ' , 7o 16s9a ° P. ,SUS 7 s = L/z , F7S • y0 x X31 l 'ia� 2 U S �. sfs . ) ` s9L o sr s a 5-r .9C.p7,g3 S a 74 cLe-'`1.2 _ os• C-) %• g„) /‘' iting. n i 9 ! c or- ra t : :.,T_ ': 0. { nor ,-aC- . ^ De, . a / ierrne. C;,.r. /• __ Proposer/ Ale w \ i Cures( • __ .,_ i _ _ _ ° i r Pr Op CS, a re _ 1 _ C I ....- N .I z , m .1 - _..-_. _. /{/ Cur r n ' _ ._--- T - — - - - • • L c (:1 i CG r1.4 I \ 1 y . da T O ropos el. j • • -- r _ ._. _ _{ i i , 1Ir Q ON N Q ( C` (Y r r 4 ( Q u r r q ( - i ` .. -. I ! 4 c A a) 7 i I 1 i •-..� 1 r t . i i I lJ ( 1 f ' N 1 l f s: �� . oP° V • E----- 1v w e R*s y ▪l• ,w .titCri 1 v f :+ *. !%!v.*,5,u f/*44144*,e �• V". .11K +1.. .16 + + f(.f+ v� N,`lf i 4:'.U+f.. 'f Y•6�. . qY+:r bi�C+AV�a L f ,t,..`,",:',:42,1, 4 u .. • • • SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS USR-922 WILLIAM AND EVERDINA PICKERT Weld County Land Investors, Inc. c/o Capital Agricultural Production Service c/o Curtis Talley, Jr. P.O. Box 1302 Palisade, CO 81526 Richard J. and Irene Herring 1227 SW 132 Lane, #732 Seattle, WA 98146 Rodney S. and Joyce M. Pfeiff 1554 Weld County Road 40-1/2 Berthoud, CO 80513• C Harry R. and Vera Crowe, Sr. 55 Truman Boulevard Oakland, NJ 07436 Ronald R. and Luann Halverson • 19619 Weld County Road 5 Berhoud, CO 80513 0183 II II `_Ti\TE OF COLORADO 1 T(s.s, COUNTY OF WELD David B. Reynolds, being duly sworn, says that he is publisher of The Now News, a weekly newspaper published in Keenesburg in said County and State; that :yai,d .newspaper has a general circulation in said County and has been continously and uninterruptedly published therein, durine a period of at leant fifty-two consecutive weeks prior to the first publication of the annexed notice; that said newspaper it a newspaper within the meaning of thy+ r, + act of the Oeneral Assembly o• the ;.e._iotecsar Baia rmaa State of Color,-:ado, entitled "An Act ';.�C�aun�allie�`�H Mid r 2Z to regulate the printing of legal '_�o•�l �e��>� i notices and advertisements, " and �-� a Site amendments thereto; that the notice ''"4oKrosjt of which the annexed is a printed �:..ngwr, m� �� copy taken from s4ta.d newspaper, was published in said newspaper, and inw '�N "; they regular and entire issue of � maw '- mr em .a `-a. every number thereof , ,, .. • ,..:•:., USE: Livestock 1 ---- •. • n .AV bond once a week for �yy��y� dzy of Wald . st.�r..c:rsr•ive weeks; that said notice '+s ..ec of .+la I. WA% Sao published in said newspaper tawa�dsarevrl�w proper and not in any supplement aa�°Caamekaavers'near Wdd e' thereof, and that the first publication of said notice as �r � nailed to � eAforc+•�aid, was on the is • to d 4n y o s_ I... _ , 19 10 the aa.:.dwa�erwerratetd ;what >>panoe as Angola ^ a-the' esp�Citlm• are sand the last on the y day of for ;attic lasp=h1 a•_, _ d 9 _._ . .ran ad u i m Th. Naar— N..r. --- Subscribed r. r.. e" f r, -- �ubsc. ibed d 1w rn o bc , r•r_ • mm thXs 2a day of _.� , 1910 .. 00151 CITPP)1StWr AUG 131990 My COm issfan expires Mard-i 15,1992 taS- � . 1 tfttA914) • 411;# DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE(303)356-4000,EXT.4400 91510th STREET GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 �C COLORADO July 24, 1990 William Bradley Pickert Everdina Anna Marie Pickert 19504 weld County Road 5 Berthoud, CO 80513 Subject: USR-922 - Request for a Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review permit on a parcel of land described as part of the W1/2 of Section 28, T4N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado Dear Mr. and Mrs. Pickert: Your application and related materials for the request described above are complete and in order at the present time. I have scheduled a meeting with the Weld County Planning Commission on Tuesday, August 21, 1990, at 1:30 p.m. This meeting will take place in the County Commissioners' Hearing Room, first floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado. It is recommended that you and/or a representative be in attendance to answer any questions the Planning Commission members might have with respect to your application. It is the responsibility of an applicant to see that a sign is posted on the property under consideration at least 10 days preceding the hearing date. Sometime prior to August 8, 1990, you or a representative should call me to . obtain a sign to be posted on the site no later than August 11, 1990. The Department of Planning Services' staff will make a recommendation concerning this application to the Weld County Planning Commission. It is the responsibility of the applicant to call the Department of Planning Services' office a few days before the date of the Planning Commission hearing to obtain that recommendation. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to call me. Respectfully, , cjeat ith A. Schuet� Ok.N.,13r'�. Current Planner • • 79150i, )19 • ,1111. 2 6 1990 USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW APPLICATION Department of Planning Services, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Col tVdb ti0611“alk at' Phone - 356-4000 - Ext. 4400 Case Number '412z Date Received 2-2( -S� Application Checked-by Mylar plat submitted do F j-,2.G -Svp Application Fee ri0o Receipt Number 111°74 Recording Fee Receipt Number TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT: (please print or type, except for necessary signature 3-' (we), the undersigned, hereby request a hearing before the Weld County Planning Commission and Weld County Board of County Commissioners concerning the proposed Use by Special Review Permit on the following described unincorporated area of Weld County, Colorado:LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT AREA: W Section ..2 .? T N, R 481 W LEGAL DESCRIPTION of conxiguous property owned upon which Special Review Permit is proposed: U) iii Section A)2. 8. T 4 N, R cog W CoProperty Address (if available) 196'0 9 (,VC. R �S B,or1h0 cid C s PRESENT ZONE Age.; r . (f G r�1 OVERLAY ZONES o n c} r; c, v 1 1 � r et / TOTAL ACREAGE r L/ '7 ( t ,s 7 PROPOSED LAND USE V4 r , FR"' pq EXISTING LAND USE Da i r �/ /-4 r M SURFACE FEE (PROPERTY OWNERS) OF AREA PROPOSED FOR THE USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT: Y' !- f� Name: fit: 1LkM 1? ral �C � �. GKPY 1 Address: / 9 Sv V w S" _ city seer-rho v o' Zip Sepci Home Telephone 0 5;z - 43_7 g Business Telephone ® Sa M e Name:Z Uer-{iA) g'Nacq mar; I-i C e t- t Address: / $Q y W C K $" _ City P Q Zip gorj i Rome Telephone 0 S' 3a __3„1.7z Business Telephone Sci, Ant APPLICANT OR AUTHORIZED AGENT Sif different than above) : Name: Address: City Zip Home Telephone 8 Business Telephone a List the owner(s) and/or lessees of mineral rights on or under the subject properties of record. Name: Address: City Zip Name: Address: City Zip I hereby depose and state under the penalties of perjury that all statements, proposals and/or plans submitted with or contained within the application are true and correct to the best o£ my knowledge. COUNTY OF WELD ) STATE OF COLORADO ) Signature: Owner or A horized Agent 'ttolA RY':-t N.SOstrIbrftenta sworn to before me this daz—day of cam\.. 19go. F �QN ` Nts\s P.\•ctUBL C / y �F ( 0 Calvin Expitaa Fab. 13, 1991 v'1..v X83 M My commission expires r EP 9 AFFIDAVIT or INTEREST OWNERS SURFACE ESTATE Application No. Subject Property SATE OF COLORADO ) ss. COUNTY OF WELD ) THE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn, states that to the best of his or her knowledge, the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names, addresses, and the corresponding Parcel Identification Number assigned by the Weld County Assessor of the owners of property (the surface estate) within 500 feet of the property which is the subject of the application. This list was compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor, an ownership update from a title or abstract company, derived from such records, or from the records of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. The list compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor shall have been assembled within 30 days of the application submission data. ,Q 1407ARYt• , ‘4TheThiNforegoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me this'AQya_'^day of qty , 19 3,5)_. by tom: \\;ciw. o `r. a 1. WITNESS my hand and official seal. My Commission expires: My Commission EKp+r.. F+b, 13, 1993 lass. Cy,c A N ary Public QC0733 II • July 25, 1990 Berthoud, co. Weld County Planning Services Mr. Keith Schuett Planner 915 10th Street Greeley, Co. 80631 ,Dear Keith, In order to facilitate speedy processing of the submitted special use request for Pickerts Dairy, I would like to request pre-advertising before the County Commisloners meeting. I am willing to pay this cost. The reasons for needing speedy approval are; We have applied for a Federal Land Bank loan on the real estate to lower our interest cost and to finance some much needed improvements that we have planned on doing this summer. This loan approval 1s now stalled because of the unexpected request of the planning department that we must have a special use permit. Also, my son Scott who is a partner in the business, would like to have his newly acquired double wide home moved onto the property before the weather gets bad and to eliminate the $165.00 a month fee he now pays for rent in a distant trailer park. Thank you for your consideration of this request. d nclerlyQ D .ete LizAi Brad Rickert __}_r 1y —ter ��] J I�QI J \\ \I But 2 6 1990 Itli Co. Rom 60011310 SC0783 4f • • RE : SPECIAL REVIEW FICKERTS DAIRY BERTHOUD, COLORADO 19504 WCR # 5 Applicants property is presently being used As a family dairy operation. The dairy facility has been in use for well over twenty years. The present owners have been dairying on the property since January of 1981 . The Bradley Plckert family derive their livihood from the income of a herd of dairy cattle that at present numbers approximately 450 head. We also use the property as our home. We also over the years have been fortunate enough to have had two sons working with us. At this tire, as we ask for this special review, find ourselves needing to expand our cattle numbers and our personal use housing facilities to accomadate three sons and their families wishing to be partners in the business. Cur special review request then is for 1000 head of dairy cattle , the corrals neccesary to hold and feed them,barns when deemed nee- cesary to protect them from the weather and or to milk and store produced product. Also their may come a time when we will wish to store all of our feedstuffs under cover or in specially constructed facilities . A separate building will be needed to act as mobile equipment storage and a repair shop. We believe six houses could be needed for family and labor. six total number. Nearly all of the surrounding properties surrounding are used for agricultural production the exceptions being two rural homes within five hundred feet. Cne of these homes is occupied by a couple whose major source of income is a job in Denver, however they do raise wheat on their r acres. The other rural home is lo- cated on three acres, presently unoccupied. Cur son ob is trying to purchase this property for his residence . A dairy operation of Any major size usually is o twenty four hour a day operation, ours would be no different. We will run three daily milking shifts with a labor .force tossibly growing to twenty people including our families. A variety of vehicles ranging from personal cars and pickup trucks to full sized legal road semi-trailers would serve our dairy using state highway #56 and held County road #5 as their basic routes. We would expect at least one milk pickup daily by semi And probably seven to ten feed or service or route supply trucks weekly. The .:a- jor exception to this would be heavy local farm truck dellverys during feed harvest seasons. Family housing will use health department Arproved septic systems. Cagle -tenure could be stockpiled for up to six morth rericds be- fore removal. Cattle feed stockpiles could be on hand :'or up to nine months. Garbage removal is done by contract and is removed on a wee>ly basis.Storm water reter_tion see attached exhibit . :Dater will be supplied by Little Thompson see attached letter. Fire pro- tection see attached exhibit. Garbage removal done by Ginther Trash nesters . Q 07,91 Their is no special plan for landscaping. We presently have lawns flower borders, trees and the like that are well maintained. Any erosion control is handled as needed. The facility could easily be converted to alternate egriculturel uses in the advent that their is no longer a need for dairy farms. Our time table is; we are already in operation as future reeds and funds occur then expansion will happen. The existing dairy is located on land already owned by applicant. The Weld County Comprehensive Plan specifically designates that the property be developed for agriculture and limited housing, the area surrounding is that, as previously described, the property in question will remain agriculture with a. higher than normal concen- traticn of cows per acre . Weld plen also designates ag industry. The dairy operation when operating at full capacity will not develop any unusual or objectionable noises, however if in any case such is not the case , then, we will comply with any applicable noise standards. The dairy does not intend to produce any toxic wastes or any other product or by-product that will be Injurious to the health, safety or welfare of the inhabitants of the surrounding area or ccunty or the employees or owners of the business. The dairy intends to comply with any plan developed in accordance with the county health depart- ment. See attached exhibit_ • The area is not located in a flood plain as indicated on the map produced by the national flood insurance program map revised in September 28, 1952 map panel 725. Weld County Airport is approxi- mately thirty five miles away. The county soils map shows four soil types located on the prop- erty designated by numbers17,61 , 65 and82 these soils described on attached exhibit . i • SPECIAL USE ADLEITLU4 PICKERTS DAIRY The Starbird ditch appears to run adjacent to the East property line. ;sir. Louis Bein is the ditch secretary. His office being at PO Box 10'79 3erthoud, Colorado &:051? . 9Cv73,3 1 • PREPLAN INFORMATION SHEET BERTHOUD FIRE DEPAR K NT DATE PREPARED 6/15/90 NAME OF BUSINESS PiCkert Dairy NATURE OF BUSINESS Dairy Production ADDRESS 1QSns GYf ei [armory AN S OWNER OR MANAGER With= Bradley Pickert IN CASE OF EMERGENCY NOTIFY; NAME William Bradley Picxert PHONE 532-3292 NAME EVerdina AnnaMaria Pickert PHONE 532-3292 NAME PHONE 532-3880 NAME 5(Za t . 211Ca PiCKINCt PHONE 532-4513 NAME ;tart Flrian Pirkart PHONE 512-3292 TOTAL NUMBER OF PEOPLE NORMALLY ON PREMISES, DAY 7 + NIGHT 7• APPROXIMATE SOUARE FT.OF BUILDING_ 1736 • NUMBER OF EXITS 3 NUMBER OF LEVELS IN BUILDING (COUNTING BASEMENT) 1 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION Rlr•rY mina-nr; truce Werra, mt.& IS BUILDING PROTECTED BY A SPRINKLING SYSTEM? No IF PARTIALLY,WHAT PARTS? NA DOES BUILDING HAVE AN OUTSIDE FIRE ALARM? No FLAMABLE LIOUIOS(WHAT,NORMAL AMOUNTS,WHERE LOCATED). Farmland Lubricants Indol ISO 68 (45 gal) OTHER HAZARDOUS MATERIALS(WHAT,NORMAL AMOUNT,LOCATION). PC .570 chlo+-anatni ;m ear no gal 1 FC 298 CIP acid clean (15 gal.) corrosive Pouaaine Sanit4?ina (15 gal .1 OTHER SPECIAL HAZARDS(GIVE SPECIFIC HAZARD AND LOCATION). rrarn 12 (30 Tb.1 kttaehed shed LPG 500 cal. NE corner o£ building trr/nri "•-min- Sr VF' of 1-n141Aing _ LOCATION OF REMOVABLE VALUABLE RECORDS OR PROPERTY. • :Avid Nitrogen NE corner nr block building ® t /�Aerial s' ' (a) Fu 6.1 WV 1 4 P 6 soo 9AI � f O Tartk-s , �J — • powitt gut. Qwut TnHfc G 1 2 3als $ WOCIA 44410.04 54441L cpzam Milk Partin POI 13.1%.4 I i I 1 1 eorpou sots I I . iiis atFaittud► ces I I I e, Li cieartis I I (4s epts) Ate"( (a /12a.) a/4 F4.th I l - - - — —I Ca haws Lac ) 4C 0723 • -- r — : I I ' i SHOW GENERAL LOCATION OF BUILDING IN RELATION TO: 7.Nearby Hazards ®Nearest Hydrant -- I r 1 3 Other touron of water i I{ I 0.Navy Traffic Areas i 5.Name moaning meats .. I, NOtas CO diagrams: • - --- -j— { , ---- #1 CR 3 + CR40 is <500 cm - I } - #2 HWX 56 + CR. 1 >1000 elan i -, I I • . . I "` YTY -1---- I I ' i I i I , .. -7—i It I 1 I , . 1 .. I 000 t 0 11 II = A � � P MSC " gCH O ----- --. - — r a — T It room W i f-.—r.-- m O z t JO-- ---`�- - - .._ s 0 to i 1 . x ----1— j - _ - +r < $ z O. 1 I ._-. C > by C --.-_ _.._�---L..:-.. 13 I I , 2 C Z C ➢ D m ,. I I { A m r D _ Re r co e or I i a rn � a .. --.- —-I —1 _ m m 9 > D n n y M._�-� _-�. - .�_._. .. I . . . .. _ O > Y ..__ ..__. . l ._-._._ _.�.L._._. -. .��_.. . ..- _ _ �° r C E _ I a CO 0 7. ... __ O m T - . .i m m w . . i .. . •-_-- . . . y w I i C n --. ...-1 . - _._ -.. . __. �_i - _ i - ._.. ^ D y _ j... CC i ad �./.i q 3' co r m r m - .. .- . .--.... . g,___. - - -��r- H • i LITTLE THOMPSON WATER DISTRICT DIRECTORS. Yelepncoe 532409E ye ""°s' "°"' June 14, 1990 �rimer 0 Avenue" unmGlenn W.Geean Wiwi Cando 80513 ten URA Rem Gonna Tom Re,nnI0 E.TRdNe weme Wrikramm mmimMR RWd M.M.M~ Mr. Brad Pickert 19504 Weld County Road 5 Berthoud, Colorado 80513 Re: Service Commitment Dear Mr. Pickert; In response to your request that we provide you with information as to the possibility of providing additional water service to your dairy at the above address, the following is pertinent: 1. Currently, a 1" meter provides service to the dairy, and we will continue to provide this service in accordance with the water Service Agreement between the • owner and the District. The maximum sustained capacity of this meter is 50 gallons per minute (GPM) . 2. This 1" meter is supplied by means of a 6" diameter water main located on the south side of Weld county Road 40 1/2. The main has additional capacity available at this time. 3. Additional service is possible by means of an • additional water tap or enlargement of the existing tap. If you should desire to purchase a larger water tap, we will credit you with the current 1" tap fee as a "trade in" on a larger tap. 4. There are no capacity problems on that 6" line at this time, so any size tap up to 2" is available upon request/payment of necessary fees. Any larger size tap • request must be addressed by the District Board of Directors in accordance with District Rules and Regulations. I hope that this has provided you with the information which you desired. If you have questions, or should you need additional information, please contact our office. Best Regards, (QikBarry . Operations Supervisor 200783 ALTA LOAN POLICY— Amended 10-17-71 IF .,., . ....,,,�,�.. ,... .-.. r .u......n .. ,aJ..., ..I e.Aw.. / �,t/ 'r�``�•�:p '�0�!?44ir. -.4�Oa4 44,. �t C � Y POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE ISSUED BY Y a v, yx i :, STEWART TITLE L .x 'ai I:fi:c t .. GUARANTY COMPANY t 1 �N t _ t - • t 1 i . 1 ,y.. -,A SUBJECT TO THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE, THE EXCEPTIONS CONTAINED IN SCHEDULE B AND RR� Y, ^" THE PROVISIONS OF THE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS HEREOF, STEWART TITLE GUARANTY ll'1 :I:& COMPANY, a Texas corporation,herein called the Company,,iastueq aaof Dateof Policy shown in Schedule A,against Yt:P u'i:C loss or damage, not exceeding the amount of inauanorsta d5 Stb dub Aaind costs, attorneys fees and expenses Y•t '1 which the Company may become obligated to pay hereunder;sustei nedax incurred by the insured by reason of: t' 9,t'fl 1. Title to the estate or interest described in Schedule A bsirq,..vrrsOedaMenwise than as stated therein; � t"l 2. Any defect in or lien or encumbrance on suctrtitte;. +-_.r� �~ g :il rd'✓ I 3. Lack of a right of access to and from the lerW« .., p 4 A,Y, A% S•+:l 4. Unmarketability of such title; . -a! Ky°-�440 t 9; ll 5. The invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the insured:mortpage upon said estate or interest except to the t);I extent that such invalidity or unenforceabdity,or claim themot;aiGes out of the transaction evidenced by the 1�a t insured Mortgage and is based upon i5-4e7/.e- 5 I :k +, 1 •• a. usury,or 2 ,. t , b. any consumer credit protection or truth m lending laver � a S 6. The priority of any lien or encumbrance over the lien of the:insured mortgage; t 5a ¢ 7. Any statutory lien for labor or material which now has gained or hereafter may gain priority over the lien of the d :Y insured mortgage, except any such lien arising from an improvement on the land contracted for and commenced d tl� subsequent to Date of Policy not financed in whole or in part by protaeds of the indebtedness secured by the s , I' insured mongage which at Date of Policy the inured has advanced or is obligated to advance;or ° i'f • •t 8. The invalidity or unenforceabili of an I' +� ty y assignment,shown in Schedule A,of the insured mortgage or the failure t . of said assignment to vest title to the insured mortgage in the named insured assignee free and clear of all liens, p; f 1 In witness whereof, Stewart Title Guaranty Company Com t has caused this policy to be signal and sealed by its duty ; y A authorized officers as of bate of Policy shown in Schedule A. - t' y: t , : :'` STEWART TITLE " l t .. .•� ��; t GUARANTY COMPANY 'i " M ✓ � , I., ,l'4V4-90144 elj a /, .# p r;hairman of the Board �s.�•f�Oenr�j.l PTevaent 1 .. Coun.ersignact �i'•• tam kb._ • t.. Tc'zAS �. • Vr., • _ t _ �� r I Sit �'rCCr. �, s ' \ Auth0rized COhAtersiOnetUre , , ��^^ ..�\r44!Y.!Y - +�O.gip. Farrel OT nn In . _- _ PP,KY �M 9903- 4.Or4 — 4 YU�J, 1 .J IY. e" MSanaI N 002 50M 5434 • SCHEDULES PART 1 ORDER NO. : 36610 POLICY NO. : M-9903-208405 THIS POLICY DOES NOT INSURE AGAINST LOSS OR DAMAGE BY REASON OF THE FOLLOWING: 1 . RIGHTS OR CLAIMS OF PARTIES IN POSSESSION NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. 4 2. EASEMENTS, OR CLAIMS OF EASEMENTS, NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. 9. DISCREPANCIES, CONFLICTS IN BOUNDARY LINES, SHORTAGE IN AREA, ENCROACHMENTS, AND ANY FACTS WHIC44,CORRECT SURVEY AND INSPECTION OF THE PREMISE i � cvslAND WHICH ARE NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS.-1:1;, y ;:18 P, 4 . ANY LIEN, OR RICHT TO A LIES,: FORgSERVICES, LABOR, OR MATERIAL THERETOFORE OR HEREAFTER4UipilapED, IMPOSED BY LAW AND NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDSyE 5. Taxes for the year 1985 and subaegnag ^^ ears, not yet due and payable. }mot 1/4§11). �P 6 . A Condition contained'•ip Mlle Uaitq,kai, Lea Patent recorded February 17, 1896 in Book :.¢pst. page flIW NSId County Records, which states as follows: JP,ObjeatiAegggylVested and accrued water rights for mining, earieulturerWsanufacturing or other purposes, and right to ditches and reservoirs used in connection with such water rights , as may be recognized and acknowledged by the local customs, laws.and'•decisions of Courts, and also subject to the right of the proprietor of a vein or lode to extract and remove his ore therefrOmf . ahould the same be found to penetrate or intersect MI,.premises hereby granted, as provided by Law, and there ie'•reserved from the lands hereby granted , a right of way thereon for ditches or canals constructed by the authority of the United States." 7. A Condition contained in the United States Patent recorded October 12, 1908 in Book 131 at page 226 Weld County Records, which states as follows: "Subject to any vested and accrued water rights for mining, agricultural , 'manufacturing or other purposes, and right to ditches and reservoirs used in connection with such water rights, as may be recognized and acknowledged by the local customs, laws and decisions of Courts, and also subject to the right of the proprietor of a vein or lode to extract and remove his ore therefrom, should the same be found to penetrate or intersect the premises hereby granted, as provided by Law." (SW1 /2 NW1 /4 ) 8. Rights of way for County Roads 30 feet wide on either side of section and township lines, as established by the Board of Continued on next page �.C . STEWART TITLE Iv � :..7�3 GUARANTY COMPANY 99C • • Flood P1o, ; N M0.p LARIMER COUNTY �,..„. .. . —.--,—...„).- W L� oil —___. �_ _ I i i IF j II.� I II I // I I! I i; ^b 11 I ii N ,1 I • I II .� Y m s w NC- ,‘ I —7--r-/— (.oD - o O N II m ‘‘\_ J . (Ix II i II I II II 11 0� 44 II II 3 1� li ��w` ;I I a Y % L' I; t , na I I IV w si N yi ^ • f � i _b I . I •h .—.0'."------ 4:. /—'// I • 100100I1A ' w N w a• N Q u //� m • • /( �^ 1--... a D 0 / 5 Ice 1 / . i f II �I . �.. II I I 9O0783 I 1 n�a 79 NEWELL most! . 1 •M 42 . t 16_ .. I..'i�`-1 * • '. 1-'j��)<;I� 2. 4 '.Nr.�.y,.. p� 42_'"rw w . '`i.�- f.' 15 -, ` Y .1, y'O' �.. . .. �.cY'+. • .,,,:i.- 01 .�1y :r r � e2• :.a SKr,,. 2a r. t 'a- a a y 4. v. ( .`.r'I41'M.. .�F1'ls 1� :[ . ..1 Oy :. ,1 . 42 :w1:.�TMY ... 42 J r•• ,YY4i e• �5 •17v-.�.•.. 9 18 r: V� tr y'' a '0. ::. •FiS 1 1S a . .',. . 7- 4' 51 S1 19 Q 4trt ....- s,•... t. r a , '� — t c. f 17 -. 6 � 4 �." ••ti iK 79 yt.54 ..r ^y •7Z: 4 79 6�i .��' � w':U r• :�. ^j a fv (v -• i"-:`,,47.773.431:7, 4, . *St •eici-0;-. taIII ‘`,, • �a •1. 20 ,+ - '.'- Shy .:. • 8 r.-..17. 17 _ '_ 61 • 82 s 83SYY '1.. � •-.f`v �� 7 6 65, .j,. t sek 17. • An •,:,(. �� •v C f 82K r S 79 t 4.< 79 K `_. u..a.. .'. tee. l -.. .. I ,c . , a _ .,,�`•+ 81 LAKE'''.E' g3 `ac , '� , lir •� \ �� 51 .pro .. .. 65 e �•± `l. • 17 ..� v 19/'^ .O c Yr .f 34- • 34 ✓ O c - R' ,.r ` 1 j:: (7,71�ry//66..!�� .. .fir + sRyorK _ COUNTY, COLORADO, SOUTHERN PART. 15 rigating close grown crops and pasture. Furrows, contour of 4,850 to 5,050 feet It formed in calcareous eolian furrows, and cross slope furrows are suitable for row deposits Included in mapping are small areas of soils that crops. Sprinkler irrigation is also. desirable. Keeping til- have fine sandy loam or loam underlying material and lage to a minimum and utilizing crop residue help to con- small areas of soils that are shallow to moderately deep trol erosion. Maintaining fertility is important Crops over shale and sandstone. respond to applications of phosphorus and nitrogen. Typically the surface layer of this Colby soil is pale In nonirrigated areas this soil is suited to winter wheat brown loam about 7 inches thick. The underlying material The predicted average yield is 28 bushels per acre. The is very pale brown silt loam to a depth of 60 inches. soil is summer followed in alternate years to allow Permeability is moderate. Available water capacity is moisture accumulation. Generally precipitation is too low high. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. for beneficial use of fertilizer. Surface runoff is rapid,and the erosion hazard is high. Stubble mulch farming, atriperopping, and minimum til- This soil is suited to limited cropping. Intensive lage are needed to control soil blowing and water erosion. cropping is hazardous because of erosion. The cropping Terracing also may be needed to control water erosion. system should be limited to close grown crops,such as al- The potential native vegetation is dominated by blue 'falfa, wheat, and barley. This soil also is suited to ir- grama. Several mid grasses, such as western wheatgrass tinted pasture. A suitable cropping system is 3 to 4 and needleandthread, are also present Potential produc- years of alfalfa followed by 2 years of corn and small lion ranges from 1,600 pounds per acre in favorable years grain and alfalfa seeded with a nurse crop. to 1,000 pounds in unfavorable years. As range condition Close grown crops can be irrigated from closely spaced deteriorates, the mid grasses decrease; blue grama, buf- contour ditches or sprinklers. Contour furrows or sprin- falograss, snakeweed, yucca, and fringed sage increase; klers should be used for new crops Applications of and forage production drops. Undesirable weeds and an- nitrogen and phosphorus help in maintaining good produc- nuals invade the site as range condition becomes poorer. Lion. Management of vegetation on this soil should be based The potential native vegetation is dominated by blue on taking half and leaving half of the total annual produc- grams Sideoats grams, little bluestem, western wheat- lion. Seeding is desirable if the range is in poor condition. grass, and sedge are also prominent Potential production Sideoats grams, little bluestem, western wheatgraas, blue ranges from 1,800 pounds per ace in favorable years to grama, pubescent wheatgrass,and crested wheatgrass are 1,500 pounds in unfavorable years. As range condition suitable for seeding. The grass selected should meet the deteriorates, the aideoata grama and little bluestem seasonal requirements of livestock. It can be seeded into decrease, forage production drops, and blue grams, buf- a clean, firm sorghum stubble, or it can be drilled into a falogrrsa, and several perennial forbs and shruba in- firm prepared seedbed. Seeding early in spring has crease. Undesirable weeds and annuals invade the site as proven most successful. range condition becomes poorer. Windbreaks and environmental plantings of trees and Management should be based on taking half and leaving shrubs commonly grown in the area are generally well half of the total annual production. Seeding is desirable if suited to this soil. Cultivation to control competing the range is in poor condition. Sideoats grams, little - vegetation should be continued for as many years as bluestem, western wheatgrass, and pubescent wheatgrass possible following planting. Trees that are best suited and are suitable for seeding. The grass selected should meet have good survival are Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern the seasonal needs of livestock It can be needed into a redcedar, ponderosa pine, Siberian elm, Russian-olive, and dean, firm sorghum stubble, or it can be drilled into a hackberry. The shrubs best suited are skunlcbush sumac, firm prepared seedbed. Plowing and drilling should be on lilac. Siberian peaahrub, and American plum. the contour to minimize runoff and soil losses Seeding Openland wildlife, such as pheasant, mourning dove, early in spring has proven moat successful and cottontail, and rangeland wildlife, such as antelope, Windbreaks and environmental plantings of trees and cottontail, and coyote, are best suited to this soil Under shrubs commonly grown in the area are generally well irrigation, good wildlife habitat can be established, suited to this soiL Cultivation to control competing benefiting many kinds of openland wildlife. Forage vegetation should be continued for as many years as production is typically low on rangeland, and grazing possible following planting.Trees that ate best suited and management is needed if livestock and wildlife share the have good survival are Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern range. Livestock watering facilities also are utilized by redcedar,ponderosa pine, Siberian elm, Russian-olive, and various wildlife species. hackberry. The shrubs best suited are skunkbush sumac This soil has good potential for urban and recreational lilac, Siberian peashrub,and American plum. developments. Road design can be modified to compen- Openland wildlife, auch as pheasant, mourning dove, sate for the limited capacity of this soil to support a load. and cottontail, and rangeland wildlife, such an antelope, Capability subclaas Me irrigated, IVe nonirrigated; cottontail, and coyote, are best suited to this soil Under Loamy Plains range site. irrigation, good wildlife habitat can be established, X 17—.Colby loam, 5 to 9 percent slopes This is a deep, benefiting many kinds of openland wildlife. Forage well drained soil on upland hills and ridges at elevations production is typically low on rangeland, and grazing .S+CC X83 • • 16 son. sunny management is needed if livestock and wildlife share the ments of livestock. It can be seeded into a clean, firm range. Livestock watering facilities also are utilized by sorghum stubble, or it can be drilled into a firm prepared various wildlife species. seedbed. Plowing and drilling should be on the contour to This soil has good potential for urban and recreational minimize runoff and soil losses. Seeding early in spring developments. Road design can be modified to compen- has proven most successsfuL Capability subclass IVe sate for the limited capacity of this soil to support a load. nonirrigated; Colby soil in Loamy Slopes range site, Capability subclass IVe irrigated, VIe nonirrigated; Adena soil in Loamy Plain*range site. Loamy Slopes range site. 19—Colombo clay loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes. This is 18—Colby-Adena loam*, 3 to 9 percent slopes. These a deep, well drained soil on flood plains and terraces at gently sloping to moderately sloping soils are on plains, elevations of 4,600 to 4,780 feet It formed in stratified hills, and ridges at elevations of 4,750 to 4,900 feet The calcareous alluvium. Included in mapping are small areas Colby soil, which makes up about 55 percent of the map of soils that have a loam surface layer and some small unit, occupies the steeper, convex parts of the landscape. leveled areas. The Adena soil, about 30 percent of the unit, occupies the Typically the surface layer of this Colombo soil is dark less steep, slightly concave parts. About 15 percent is grayish brown clay loam about 14 inches thick The upper Kim loam and Weld loam. 7 inches of the underlying material is pale brown The Colby soil is deep and well drained. It formed in stratified clay loam and loam. The lower part to a depth calcareous eolian deposits. Typically the surface layer is of 60 inches is very pale brown loam stratified with thin pale brown loam about 7 inches thick. The underlying lenses of fine sand,medium sand,and clay loam. material to a depth of 60 inches is very pale brown silt Permeability is moderate. Available water capacity is loam. high. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Permeability is moderate. Available water capacity is Surface runoff is slow,and the erosion hazard is low. high. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. In irrigated areas this soil is suited to crops commonly. Surface runoff is rapid, and the erosion hazard is high. grown in the area, such as corn, sugar beets, beans, alfal- The Adena soil also is deep and well drained and fa,onions,and potatoes. formed in calcareous eolian deposits Typically the surface All methods of irrigation that are common to the area layer is brown loam about 6 inches thick. The subsoil is are used. Borders are suitable for small grain, alfalfa,and brown and very pale brown clay loam about 3 inches pasture. Furrow irrigation is used for row crops. Crops thick The substratum to a depth of 60 inches is very pale respond to application of nitrogen and phosphorus. brown silt loam. Windbreaks and environmental plantings of trees and Permeability is slow. Available water capacity is high. shrubs commonly grown in the area are generally well The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Surface suited to this soil Cultivation to control competing runoff is medium, and the erosion hazard is moderate. vegetation should be continued for as many years as This unit is used for nonirrigated cropland and range- possible following planting. Trees that are best suited and land. It is suited to winter wheat, barley, and sorghum. have good survival are Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern Most of the acreage is planted to winter wheat and is redcedar,ponderosa pine, Siberian elm, Russian-olive, and summer fallowed in alternate years to allow moisture ac- hackberry. The shrubs best suited are akunkbush sumac, cumulation. Generally precipitation is too low for benefi- lilac, Siberian peashrub, and American plum. cial use of fertilizer. Wildlife is an important secondary use of this soil Stubble mulch farming, striperopping, and minimum til- Ring-necked pheasant, mounting dove, and many non- lage are needed to control soil blowing and water erosion. game species can be attracted by establishing arras for Terracing also may be needed to control water erosion. nesting and escape cover. For pheasants, undisturbed The potential native vegetation on this unit is nesting cover is essential and should be included in plans dominated by blue grams. Sideoats grams, little bluestem, for habitat development, especially in areas of intensive and western wheatgrass are also prominent Potential agriculture. production ranges from 1,800 pounds per acre in favors Where this soil is on flood plains and is susceptible to ble years to 1,100 pounds in unfavorable years. As range flooding it liar poor potential for urban and recreational condition deteriorates, the sideoats grams and little development On the higher terraces the potential is fair. bluestem decrease, forage production drops, and blue Dwelling and road designs need to be modified to in- • grama, buffalograss, and- several perennial forbs and crease the capacity of the soil to support a load and to 4, shrubs increase. Undesirable weeds and annuals invade protect it against frost action. Capability subclass IIw ir- the site as range condition becomes poorer. rigated. Management should be based on taking half and leaving 20—Colombo clay loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes. This is half of the total annual production. Seeding is desirable if a deep, well drained soil on flood plains and terraces at the range is in poor condition. Sideoats grams little elevations of 4,600 and 4,780 feet It formed in stratified bluestem, western wheatgrass, bluegrama, pubescent calcareous alluvium. Included in mapping are small areas wheatgrass, and crested wheatgrass are suitable for seed- of soils that have a .loam surface layer. Some small ing. The grass selected should meet the seasonal require- leveled areas are also included SC 0783 40 ® SOIL SURVEY • r • . from 800 pounds per acre in favorable years to 500 production ranges from 1,750 pounds per acre in favora- pounds in unfavorable years. As range condition deteri- ble years to 950 pounds in unfavorable years. As range orates, the mid grasses decrease and forage production condition deteriorates, the sideoats grams, little bluestem. i drops. Undesirable weeds and annuals invade the site as and sand reedgrass decrease; yucca, sedge, and blue range condition becomes poorer. grama increase; and forge production drops Management of vegetation on the Shingle soil should be Management of vegetation should be based on taking based on taking half and leaving half of the total ammal half or less of the total annual production. Deferred graz- production. Seeding is desirable if the range is in poor ing is practical in improving range condition. Seeding and condition. Western wheatgrasa, blue grams, alkali sacaton, mechanical treatment are impractical sideoats grams, little bluestem, pubescent wheatgrass, Windbreaks and environmental plantings are generally and crested wheatgrass are suitable for seeding. The not suited to this soil. Onsite investigation is needed to grass selected should meet the seasonal requirements of determine if plantings are feasible. livestock It can be seeded into a clean, firm sorghum Production of vegetation on this treeless soil is low, stubble, or it can be drilled into a firm prepared seedbed, especially during drought, when annual production can be Seeding early in spring has proven most successful as low as 300 pounds per acre. Rangeland wildlife,such as The potential native vegetation on the Renohill soil is antelope and scaled quail, can be attracted by managing dominated by western wheatgrass and blue grams Buf- livestock grating, installing livestock watering facilities, falograss is also presented. Potential production ranges and reseeding where needed. This soil has poor potential for urban development The from 1,000 pounds per acre in favorable years to 600 pounds in unfavorable years. Aa range condition deteri- orates, a blue grams.-buffalograss sod forms Undesirable Capability subclass VIe irrigated, VIe nonirrigated; Sand- weeds and annuals invade the site as range condition stone Breaks range site. becomes poorer. 62—Terry fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes.This is a moderately deep well drained soil on plains at eleva- Management of vegetation on the Renohill soil should be based on taking half and leaving half of the total an-. trons of 4,500 to 5,000 feet It formed in residuum from nun] production Range pitting can reduce runoff. Seeding sandstone. Included in mapping are small areas of soils is desirable if the range is in poor condition. Western that have sandstone deeper than 40 inches Also included wheatgrass, blue grams, sideoats grama, buffalograss, pu_ are small areas of soils that have a subsoil of sandy clay bescent wheatgrass, and crested wheatgrass are suitable loam and clay loam. for seeding. The grass selected should meet the seasonal 1YPIca]lY the surface layer of this Terry soil is pale brown requirements of livestock It can be seeded into a clean, fine sandy loam about 6 inches thick The subsoil is farm sorghum stubble, or it can be drilled into a firm pale brown fine randy loam about 21 inches thick The prepared seedbed. Seeding early in spring has proven substratum is very pale brown fine sandy loam. Sand- most successfu atone is at a depth of about 37 inches Rangeland wildlife, such as antelope, cottontail, and Permeability is moderately rapid Available water capacity is moderate. The effective rooting depth is 20 to coyote, are best suited to this unit Because forage production is typically low,grazing management is needed s ]ow. inches Surface runoff is slow, and the erosion hazard i if livestock and wildlife share the range. Livestock water s Li com- ing facilities also are utilized by various wildlife species. This soil n suited a most of the irrigated sops Capability subclass VIe irrigated, VIe nonirrigated; Shin- some e nly groom m the area. Thepin moderate depth restricts gle soil in Shady Plains range site, RenohM soil in C e come trope A suitable cropping system is corn corn for Plains range site. Y serge, barley, 3 to 4 yearn of 'arnica, and wheat This soil 61—Teasel Tine sandy loam. S to 20 is also well suited to irrigated pasture. percent slopes. Furrows or sprinklers can be used in irrigating row This is a shallow, well drained soil on upland breaks at crops. Flooding from contour ditches and sprinkling are elevations of 4,850 to 5,200 feet It formed in residuum suitable in irrigating close grown crops and pasture. Small from sandstone. Included in mapping are small areas of heads of water and short runs reduce the risk of erosion. sandstone outcrop and areas of noncalcareous soils. Production can be maintained b Typically the surface layer of this Tassel soil is light b a by frequent irrigations and yellowish brown fine sandy loam about 7 inches thick.The y applications of barnyard manure and commercial feu op underlying deer. Keeping tillage to a minimum and utilizing crop ymg material is light yellowish brown very fine residue are important sandy loam. Sandstone is at a depth of about 11 inches. In nonirrigated areas this soil is suited to winter wheat. Permeability is moderately rapid. Available water barley, and sorghum. Most of the acreage is planted to capacity is low. The effective rooting depth is 10 to 20 winter wheat The predicted average yield is 25 bushels inches. Surface runoff is medium, and the erosion hazard per acre. The soil is summer fallowed in alternate years is moderate. to allow moisture accurnulation. Generall The potential native vegetation is dominated by too low for beneficial use of fertilizer. y precipitation is sideoats grama, little bluestem, blue grams, threadleaf Stubble mulch farming, striperopping, and minimum til- sedge, sand reedgrass, and needleandthread. Potential lage are needed to control soil blowing and water erosion. .....,..“.• „i&a • • 42 SOIL SURVEY Typically the surface layer is brown loam about 8 The underlying shale is the most limiting feature o£ inches thick. The underlying material is pale brown and this soil Neither septic tank absorption fields nor sewage very pale brown loam. Shale is at a depth of about 28 lagoons function properly. In places the underlying shale inches. has high shrink-swell potential. Environmental and beau- Permeability and available water capacity are tification plantings of trees and shrubs can be difficult to moderate. The effective rooting depth is 20 to 40 inches. establish Capability subclass IVs irrigated; IVe nonir- Surface runoff is medium,and the erosion hazard is low. ,r[igated; Loamy Plains range site. This soil is suited to limited cropping. A suitable 1(.65—Thedalund loam, 3 to 9 percent slopes This is a. cropping system is 3 to 4 years,of alfalfa followed by 2 moderately deep, well drained soil on plains at elevations years of corn and small grain and alfalfa seeded with a of 4,900 to 5,250 feet. It formed in residuum from shale. nurse crop. Incorporating plant residue and manure ins- Included in mapping are small areas of soils that have , proves tilth and provides organic matter and plant shale and sandstone deeper than 40 inches Some small nutrients. outcrops of shale and sandstone are also included Most irrigation methods are suitable, but the length of TYpically the surface layer of this Thedalund soil is runs should be short to prevent overirrigation. Light, brown loam about 8 inches thick.The underlying material frequent irrigations are best Sprinkler irrigation is is pale brown and very pale brown loam. Shale is at a desirable. Commercial fertilizers increase yields and add depth of about 25 inches to the value of the forage produced. Permeability and available water capacity are - In nonirrigated areas this soil is suited to winter wheat, moderate. The effective rooting depth is 20 to 40 inches. barley, and sorghum. Most of the acreage is planted to Surface runoff is medium to rapid,and the erosion hazard winter wheat The predicted average yield is 25 bushels is moderate* per acre. The aoil is summer (allowed in alternate years T soil is suited to limited cropping Intense i� to allow moisture accumulation. Generally precipitation is cropping ill hazardous because of erosion. The eropp g system should be limited to such close grown crops as al- too low for beneficial use of fertilizer. - Yalta wheat, and barley. The soil is also suited to nsti Stubble mulch farming, striperopping,and minimum til- lage are needed to control soil blowing and water erosion. " asture. A suitable cropping system is 3 to 4 gated p Terracing also may be needed to control water erosion. years of alfalfa followed by 2 years of corn and small grain and alfalfa seeded with?.nurse crop The potential native vegetation is dominated by blue grama. Several mid grasses, such as western wheatgrassused in irrigating close grown crops Contour furrows or Closely spaced contour ditches or sprinkler can be and needleandthread, are also present. Potential produo- a•ran rmgatmg close grown crops Contour furrows or h sprinklers should be used for new crops Application of tion ranges from 1,600 pounds per acre in favorable yea 1,000 pounds in unfavorable years. As range condition commercial fertilizer helps in maintaining good produc- t* deteriorates, the mid s decrease; blue but- Lion >?�'� Bu' s, The potential native vegetation is dominated by blue falograss, snakeweed, yucca, and fringed sage increase; grams. Several mid grasses, such as western wheatgrass and forage production drops. Undesirable weeds and an- and needleandthread, are also present Potential produc- nuals invade the aite as range condition becomes poorer. tion ranges from 1,600 pounds per acre in favorable year Management of vegetation on this soil should be based to 1400 pounds in unfavorable years. As range condition on taking half and leaving half of the total mutual produo- deteriorates, the mid grasses decrease; blue grams, buf- tion. Seeding is desirable if the range is in poor condition. falograss, snakeweed, yucca, and fringed sage increase; Sideoats grams little bluestem, western wheatgrasa, blue and forage production drops. Undesirable weeds and an- gratna, pubescent wheatgrass, and crested wheatgrass are nuals invade the site as range condition becomes poorer. suitable for seeding. The grass selected should meet the Management of vegetation on this soil should be based seasonal requirements of livestock. It can be seeded into on taking half and leaving half of the total annual produc- a clean, firm sorghum stubble, or it can be drilled into a tion. Seeding is desirable if the range is in poor condition. firm prepared seedbed. Seeding early in spring has Sideoats grama, little bluestem, western wheatgrass, blue proven most successful grama, pubescent wheatgrass,and crested wheatgrass are Windbreaks and environmental plantings are generally suitable for seeding. The grass selected should meet the not suited to this soil Onsite investigation is needed to seasonal requirements of livestock It can be seeded into • determine if plantings are feasible. a clean, firm sorghum stubble, or it can be drilled into a Rangeland wildlife, such as antelope, cottontail, and firm prepared seedbed. Seeding early in spring has coyote,are best suited to this soil Because forage product- proven most successful . tion is typically low, grazing management is needed if Windbreaks and environmental plantings are generally livestock and wildlife share the range. Livestock watering not suited to this soil Onsite investigation is needed to facilities also are utilized by various wildlife species. The determine if plantings are feasible. cropland areas provide favorable habitat for pheasant and Rangeland wildlife, such as antelope, cottontail, and mourning dove. Many nongame species can be attracted coyote,are best suited to this soil.Because forage'product by establishing areas for nesting and escape cover. tion is typically low, grating management is needed if �i.Gtr0,3 • Ws. COUNTY, COLORADO, SOUTHERN PART 43 livestock and wildlife share the range. Livestock watering ing. The grass selected should meet the seasonal require- facilities also are utilized by various wildlife species. The meets of livestock. It can be seeded into a clean, firm cropland areas provide favorable habitat for pheasant and sorghum stubble, or it can be drilled into a firm prepared mourning dove. Many nongame species can be attracted seedbed. Seeding early in spring has proven most success- by establishing areas for nesting and escape cover. ful The underlying shale is the most limiting feature of Windbreaks and environmental plantings of trees and this soil. Neither septic tank absorption fields nor sewage shrubs commmonly grown in the area are generally well lagoons function properly. In places the underlying shale suited to this soil Cultivation to control competing has high shrink-swell potential. Environmental and beau- vegetation should be continued for as many years as tification plantings of trees and shrubs can be difficult to possible following phmting.Trees that are best suited and establish. Capability subclass We irrigated, VIe nonir- have good survival are Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern rigated; Loamy Plains range site. redcedar,ponderosa pine, Siberian elm, Russian-olive, and 66—Ulm clay loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes. This is a., hackberry. The shrubs beat suited are skunkbush sumac, deep, well drained soil on plains at elevations of 5,076 to lilac,Siberian peashrub,and American plant 5200 feet It formed in alluvial and eolian sediments from Wildlife is an important secondary use of this soil The shale. Included in mapping are small areas of soils that cropland areas provide favorable habitat for ring-necked have shale between 40 and 60 inches. Also included are pheasant and mourning dove. Many nongame species can small areas of soils where the surface layer and subsoil be attracted' by establishing areas for nesting and escape have been recharged with lime from irrigation. cover. For pheasants, undisturbed nesting cover is essen- Typically the surface layer of this Ulm soil is brown tial and should be included in plans for habitat develop- clay loam about 5 inches thick. The subsoil is brown and went, especially in areas of intensive agriculture. Range- pale brown clay about 14 inches thick The substratum to land wildlife, for example, the pronghorn antelope, can be a depth of 60 inches is clay and clay loam, attracted by developing livestock watering facilities, Permeability is slow. Available water capacity is high. managing livestock grazing,and reseeding where needed The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Surface This soil has poor potential for urban and recreational runoff is medium,and the erosion hazard is low. development Slow permeability and high shrink swell In irrigated areas this soil is suited to all crops corn- cause problems in dwelling and road construction. Capa- monly grown in the area, including corn, sugar beets,, bility subclass IIe irrigated, IVe nonirrigated; Clayey beans, alfalfa, and small grain. An example of a suitable Plains range site. cropping system is 3 to 4 years of alfalfa followed by 67—Ulm clay loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes. This is a corn, corn for silage, sugar beets, small grain, or beans. deep, well drained soil on plains at elevations of 5,075 to Land leveling, ditch lining, and installing pipelines are 5200 feet It formed in alluvial and eolian sediments from needed for proper water applications, shale. Included in mapping are small areas of soils that All methods of irrigation are suitable, but furrow ire have shale between depths of 40 and 60 inches Also in- rigation is the most common. Barnyard manure and corn- eluded are small areas of soils where the surface layer mercial fertilizer are needed for top yields. and subsoil have been recharged with lime from irriga- In nonirrigated areas this soil is suited to winter wheat, tion. barley, and sorghum. Most of the acreage is planted to Typically the surface of this Ulm soil is brown clay winter wheat The predicted average yield is 28 bushels loam about 5 inches thick. The subsoil is brown and pale per acre. The soil is summer !allowed in alternate years brown clay about 12 inches thick. The substratum to a to allow moisture accumulation. Generally precipitation is depth of 60 inches is clay and clay loam. too low for beneficial use of fertilizer. Permeability is slow. Available water capacity is high Stubble mulch farming,striperopping, and minimum U7- The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Surface lage are needed to control soil blowing and water erosion. runoff is medium,and the erosion hazard is moderate. ' Terracing also may be needed to control water erosion. In irrigated areas this soil is suited to the crops eom- The potential native vegetation is dominated by monly grown in the area. Perennial grasses and alfalfa or western wheatgrass and blue grams. Buffalograss is also close grown crops should be grown at least 50 percent of present Potential production ranges from 1,000 pounds the time. Contour ditches and corrugations can be used in per acre in favorable years to 600 pounds in unfavorable irrigating close grown crops and pasture. Furrows, con- years. As range condition deteriorates, a blue grams-but- tour furrows,and cross slope furrows are suitable for row falograss sod forms. Undesirable weeds and annuals in- crops Sprinkler irrigation is also desirable. Keeping til- vade the site as range condition becomes poorer, lags to a minimum and utilizing crop residue help to con- Management of vegetation on this soil should be based trol erosion. Maintaining fertility is important_ Crops on taking half and leaving half of the total annual produce respond to applications of phosphorus and nitrogen tion. Range pitting can reduce runoff.Seeding is desirable In nonirrigated areas this soil is suited to winter wheat if the range is in poor condition. Western wheatgrass, barley, and sorghum. Most of the acreage is planted to blue grams, sideoats grams, huffalograss, pubescent winter wheat The predicted average yield is 28 bushels wheatgrass, and crested wheatgrass are suitable for seed- per acre. The soil is summer followed in alternate years �`Go7C33 50 sou. stravEV sugar beets, small grain, or beans. Few conservation prac- The potential native vegetation is dominated by blue tices are needed to maintain top yields. grama. Several mid grasses, such as western wheatgrass All methods of irrigation are suitable, but furrow ir- and needleandthread, are also present Potential produe- rigation is the most common. Barnyard manure and come tion ranges from 1,600 pounds per acre in favorable years mercial fertilizer are needed for top yields. to 1,000 pounds in unfavorable years As range condition Windbreaks and environmental plantings generally are deteriorates, the mid grasses decrease- blue grama, buf- well suited to this soil Summer fallow a year before falograss, anakeweed, yucca, and fringed sage increase: • planting and continued cultivation for weed control are and forage production drops. Undesirable weeds and an- needed to insure establishment and survival of plantings. nuals invade the site as range condition becomes poorer. Trees that are best suited and have good survival are Management of vegetation on this soil should be based Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern redcedar, ponderosa on taking half and leaving half of the total annual produc- pine, Siberian elm, Russian-olive, and hackberry. The tion. Seeding is desirable if the range is in poor condition. shrubs best suited are skunkbush sumac, lilac, Siberian Sideoats grams, little bluestem, western wheatgrass, blue peashrub,and American plum. grarna, pubescent wheatgrass,and crested wheatgrass are Openland wildlife, such as pheasant, mourning dove, suitable for seeding. The grass selected should meet the and cottontail, are best suited to this soil. Wildlife habitat seasonal requirements of livestock. It can be seeded into development, including tree and shrub plantings and a clean. Ern sorghum stubble, or it can be drilled into a grass plantings to serve ee nesting areas, should be suc- firm prepared seedbed. Seeding early in spring has cessful without irrigation in most years. Under irrigation, proven most successful good wildlife habitat can be established, benefiting many Windbreaks and environmental plantings are generally kinds of openland wildlife. well suited to this soil. Summer fallow a year before This soil has good potential for urban and recreational planting and continued cultivation for weed control are development The chief limiting soil features for urban needed to insure establishment and survival of plantings development are the shrink-swell potential of the subsoil Trees that are best suited and have good survival are as it wets and dries and the limited capacity of the soil to Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern redcedar, ponderosa support a load. Lawns, shrubs,and trees grow well. Cape- pine, Siberian elm, Russian-olive, and hackberry. The bility class I irrigated. • shrubs best suited are skunkbush sumac, lilac, Siberian 79—Weld loam, 1 to 3 percent slope,:. This is a deep, peashrub,and American plum. well drained soil on smooth plains at elevations of 4,850 to Openland wildlife, such as pheasant, mourning dove, 5,000 feet It formed in eolian deposits. Included in and cottontail, are best suited to this soil. Wildlife habitat mapping are small areas of soils that have a subsoil of development, including tree and shrub plantings and loam and light clay loam. Also included are some leveled grass plantings to serve as nesting areas, should be sue- areas cessful without irrigation during most years Under ir- Typically the surface layer of this Weld soil is brown rigation, good wildlife habitat can be established, benefit- loam about 8 inches thick. The subsoil is brown and pale ing many kinds of openland wildlife. brown heavy clay loam and light clay about 20 inches This soil has good potential for urban and recreational thick.The substratum to a depth of 60 inches is silt loam. development The chief limiting soil features for urban Permeability is slow. Available water capacity is high. development are the shrink-swell potential of the subsoil - The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Surface as it wets and dries and the limited capacity of the soil to runoff is slow,and the erosion hazard is low. support a load. Lawns, shrubs,and trees grow well Capa- In irrigated areas this soil is suited to all crops com- bility subclass Ile irrigated, Inc nonirrigated; Loamy moray grown in the area, including corn, sugar beets (fig. Plains range site. 8), beans, alfalfa, small grain,and onions. An example of a 80—Weld loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes This is a deep, suitable cropping system is 3 to 4 years of alfalfa fol- well drained soil on plains at elevations of O50 to 5,000 lowed by corn,corn for silage, sugar beets,small grain, or feet It formed in eolian deposits. Included in mapping are beans. Land leveling, ditch lining, and installing pipelines small areas of soils that have a subsoil of loam and light are needed for proper water applications. clay loam. All methods of irrigation are suitable, but furrow ir- Typically the surface layer is brown loam about 8 rigation is the most common. Barnyard manure and com- inches thick. The subsoil is brown and pale brown heavy menial fertilizer are needed for top yields clay loam and light clay about 18 inches thick The sub- This soil is well suited to winter wheat, barley, and stratum to a depth of 60 inches is silt loam. sorghum if it is summer (allowed in alternate years. Permeability is slow. Available water capacity is high. Winter wheat is the principal crop. The predicted average The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Surface yield is 33 bushels per acre. If the crop is winterkilled, runoff is medium,and the erosion hazard is moderate. spring wheat can be seeded. Generally precipitation is too In irrigated areas this soil is suited to most of the crops low for beneficial use of fertilizer. commonly grown in the area, such as corn, alfalfa., wheat, Stubble mulch farming, striperopping, and minimum til- and barley. Sugar beets are often grown. The soil is lage are needed to control soil blowing and water erosion. suited to irrigated pasture. Ditch lining and installing Terracing also may be needed to control water erosion. pipelines are needed for proper water application. ✓C0783, / 52 30n. SIIRVEv _ the limited capacity of this soil to support a load. Capa- Management of vegetation on this soil should be basec bility class I irrigated. on taking half and leaving half of the total annual produc \./.. 82—Wiley-Colby complex, 1 to 3 percent slopes. This tion. Seeding is little blu le ift the range western in poor cgrass do nearly level map unit is on smooth plains in the western Sideoats ugrama t wheat and crested heatgr swheatgr ss lu part of the survey area at elevations of 4,850 to 5,000 grrma, p gam' selected should meet th ar feet The Wiley soil makes up about 60 percent of the suitable for seeding. The grass unit, and the Colby soil about 30 percent About 10 per- seasonal requirements of livestock. It can be seeded int cent is Heldt silty clay and Weld loam. a dean, firm sorghum stubble t can be dulled into The Wiley soil is deep and well drained. It formed in firm prepared seedbed. Seeding early in spring hz calcareous eolian deposits. Typically the surface layer is proven most successful general: pale brown silt loam about 11 inches thick The subsoil is Windbreaks and environmental plantings are g pale brown silty clay loam about 23 inches thick The sub- well suited to these soils. Cultivation to control competir stratum to a depth of 60 inches is very pale brown silty vegetation should be continued for as many years : clay loam. possible following planting.Trees that are best suited ar Permeability is moderately slow. Available water have good survival are Rocky Mountain juniper, Baste: capacity is high. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches redcedar, ponderosa pine, Siberian elm, Russian-olive, a: or more. Surface runoff is medium, and the erosion hackberry. The shrubs best suited are skunkbush sum: hazard is moderate. lilac, Siberian peashrub,and American plum. The Colby soil also is deep and well drained and formed Openland wildlife, such as pheasant, mourning doN in calcareous eolian deposits. Typically the surface layer and cottontail are beat suited to these soils Wildl.' is pale brown loam about 7 inches thick. The underlying habitat development, including tree and shrub plantin material is very pale brown silt loam to a depth of 60 and grass plantings to serve as nesting areas should inches. successful without irrigation during most years. Under Permeability is moderate. Available water capacity is rigation, good wildlife habitat can be established, benei high. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. ing many kinds of openland wildlife Surface runoff is medium, and the erosion hazard is The Wiley soil has only fair potential for urban moderate. recreational development. Slow permeability, mode This map unit is used for irrigated and nonirrigated shrink-swell potential, and limited bearing capacity cal cropland and for rangeland, wildlife habitat, and urban problems in dwelling and road construction The Col development soil has good potential for urban and recreational devel( In irrigated areas these soils are suited to all crops meet Road design can be modified to compensate for c commonly grown in the area, including corn, sugar beets, limited capacity of this soil to support a load. Capabil beans, alfalfa, small grain, and onions. An example of a subclass Ile irrigated, 1Ve nonirrigated; Loamy Pla suitable cropping system is 3 to 4 years of alfalfa fol- range site. lowed by corn,corn for silage, sugar beets,small grain, or 83—Wiley-Colby complex, 3 to 5 percent slopes. T beans. Land leveling, ditch lining, and installing pipelines gently sloping map unit is on plains at elevations of 4w may be needed for proper water applications to 5,000 feet The Wiley soil makes up about 60 percent All methods of irrigation are suitable, but furrow iii the unit, and the Colby soil about 30 percent. About rigation is the most common Barnyard manure and corn- percent is Heldt silty day and Weld loam. menial fertilizer are needed for top yields. The Wiley soil is deep and well drained It formed In nonirrigated areas these soils are suited to winter calcareous eolian deposits. Typically the surface layer wheat, barley, and sorghum. Most of the acreage is pale brown silt loam about 11 inches thick The subsoi planted to winter wheat The predict average yield is pale brown silty day loam about 23 inches thick The s 28 bushels per acre. The soil is summer fallowed in al- stratum to a depth of 60 inches is very pale brown s te.-nate years to allow moisture accumulation Generally clay loant precipitation is too low for beneficial use of fertilizer. Permeability is moderately slow. Available wa Stubble mulch farming, striperopping, and minimum til- capacity is high. The effective rooting depth is 60 inc lap are needed to control soil blowing and water erosion or more. Surface runoff is medium to rapid, and the e Terracing also may be needed to control water erosion sion hazard is moderate The potential native vegetation is dominated by blue The Colby soil also is deep and well drained and fort. gramal. Several mid grasses such as western wheatgrass in calcareous eolian deposits. Typically the surface la and needleandthread are also present Potential produc- is pale brown loam about 7 inches thick The underly lion ranges from 1,600 pounds per acre in favorable years material is very pale brown silt loam to a depth of to 1,000 pounds in unfavorable years. As range condition inches deteriorates, the mid grasses decrease; blue grams, buf- Permeability is moderate. Available water capacit, falograss, snakeweed, yucca and fringed sage increase; high. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or m and forage production drops. Undesirable weeds and an- Surface runoff is medium.to rapid,and the erosion haz nuals invade the site as range condition becomes poorer is moderate. r.n.so .iy.. II•t,-..... •y .• ` "• A 121981 ' i . _ x c • a,c.,e• M >µ l,..&r• 1��i +7•. , I;: • - r...: b^ a�tde aatr Fes .. i ;! .a. Berthoud 1, Box 78, 19504 Weld County JAN 1 21981 '. Road its, ehoud • County of Weld ,State of S 3'3 Se `t i • Colorado for the cone oration of THREE HURD • - THIRTY-FIVE THOUSAND AND NO/100 (5335,000.00)—•-- ' • dollar,In hand paid. hetehy eelloo and convey(e) to e I WILLIAM BRADLEY PICxERT and EVERDINA ANNAMARIE PICKERT I o •s whoselogaleddteeala Rt. 1, Box 78, 19504 Weld County Road •S, County of e- Berthoud, Colorado '" .and State of 1 c� flee following real property in the I ... - County of Weld , and State of Colorado, to wit: The property more fully described on Exhibit • ;; A which is attached hereto and is incorporated ,• », herein by this reference. 1q' �• wits all its appurtenances, anQ warrants title to the same, subject '. to: Taxes and aaaeasments for 1981 and subsequent years; easements and rights-of-way existing or of record, and boundary discrepancies 1 or eneroaehments that may be disclosed in an accurate survey; patent ' k reservations and restrictions of record; prior mineral reservations „� and conveyances of record; and existing mineral and oil and nas M 1 f record; covenants and agreements of record as the s.ime ' `n may affect the subject property; and existing encumbrance in favor d `NJ of Larwill A. Biddle and Lois S. Biddle, recorded as Reception No. 1649181 in Book 727, Weld County Records, given to secure a A promissory note dated November 25, 1974, in the original principal ' sum of S1d0,0U0.00, provided, however, that grantor shall pay and discharge said indebtedness and encumbrance as and when the payments y and obligations thereon become due, and shall indemnify and hold 1' .. )t:W(if�ttialnai garl�l43PArx harmless Grantees, their heirs, representatives, successors and assigns, from any loss or liability including reasonable ' 4 attorney's fees, in connection with or arising out of such indebtedness and encumbrance, it being understood that Grantees do not assume nor R1ikx0xlvtcomm inexm xxxn xxxxmxxxKllxxamwa x.1tx) wesx , agree to pay or discharge such indebtedness and encumbrance. ',:mot • I. ' • .1.r. jr, r r - . , Signed this 8th day of Janua.7 , 1981, w�1 Y -? .. / -. WAY E. K BSS" __. ...., . STATE OF COLORADO, ' its. .. County of Goulder l :;A;: The fnn•Koing instrument was acknowledged before nre this 8th ,-'t day of January ,19 81 by wayne E. Krebs. ' � 4 , Mycommrneionexpires August 4, 1981 .•�09.l?a24:. , Witness my hand and official seal. /�-- t :'�q.. ea e� • 1„end 1 •f r• ' Neat. N.».,ea.-alertr„m-■,W„N NbliskieG. I,M.Writ r,,.rr..(alto.,...r.Yi_.Jab MOSS—ma r. • •• ee0 783 • \ Volt" r r f. ' f * � Yf�r I ♦ • ' 1Y .. ! "0 t , • eta.s 1 ... y,,, ., J"' J :At 4- K•� 1.4 µ�� , I. of 'K 1 '. y' , 40. •�M,y�gip ...4:..... •4,"44•4,„;►'S ,,,+ ,;14 Cif a' .7 +,'�, %,* . ?V 1 • t'�; .1 28466'79 �+ EXHIBIT A a-a 'Yr_. . To Deed dAted �cY a _. , E. Itrsbs,itcrrend Millim 8ra3TeyPickart a 1981. nd rdiiiaween Wayne . �� ` Annemarie Picket, Grantees. r •.'Jed -, r,'. I •I; The property known as Boxed!' Dairy, located at Route 1, Box 78, 1°504 weld County Road 15, Berthoud, Colorado, 80513, fit' 'tell. being more fully described as feylows: 3 ! c That portion of the west Nai! (A) of Section Twenol'-eight .C14 ' 1•, "1/4....:•.w1 (26) , Township Font (4) North, Range Sixty-eight (Go) west �°�'s�,'. ;,4 of the 6th P.B., County of Weld, State of Colorado, described -- as follows: '171)) 4. • Considering the West line of the NWii of Section 28 as bearing 1l k North and South and with all bearings contained herein rJt;; 4 ;< l', relative thereto: %•!.'.�';;' Beginning at the West (hatter Corner (we Cor) of said Section h ;'ti'; )' 28: thence along the west line of the NW', North 1519.12 Si. ? ,:-- feet, more or less, to the North line of the South half '� :w �'y`fi'•'" ` (Sii) of the Nw1f: J' ,¢ ,. thence along said North line North 89.52'30" East, 897.10 �� - '!'y feet: r,. `-- . thence South 1°24'44' E,at, 526.27 'net; A.w, thence South 11.0'9.19' Last, 964,51 feet; .K. thence South 38.34'30' east, 604.85 feet: thence West 1495.50 feet to the Nest line o! the SW, o! said � .'.-+cr,o..• F, Section 28: t. ��' +thence along said west line North 0.24'30' 'talc, 622.98 feet .'�,r t0 the Point of Beginning. 7.e),:-0. 4.. c Together with all appu:tanances theretr• and together with ally*, , water and ditch rights appurtenant thecetc, including (1` •hare of the capital stock of the New Ish, (10) share of the capital • ,; :.te: stock of the Ida Starbird Ditch and Reservoir Company. and (1) 2,4, ''. ' %h '+Little Thompson Water District domestic water tap. And together '•Y •' 4 with all Dairy parlor equipment, including but not limited to ��+ < s• milking units, bulk tanks, pipe lines, automatic take-offs, etc. , , :e Big-Outchman grain tank and feeding system, (I) propane tank, :°??,-..:. ::. ` water tanks, three-phase portable generator, corral gates, • ; '•"' . and together with the dishwa•.her, range, refrigerator, 7arpets, • [ , '. drupes and rods in the residence on such property. . .' t'" n t ° 1. - '/.f. i ' . :. ii� I; h s. ' et • :ta9. . ' . .T.,R+ • ? I •`, :/..� ' 0: , `• . µ • • MeMORAnDUM Aline Keith Schtt ro Weld County Planning �n� July 18. 1990 COLORADO From Environmental Protection Services 911-66,./OGkn Brad Pickett Dairy Farm &Moot The Division has reviewed and evaluated the site of the proposed dairy expansion located at 19504 WCR 5. The design as follows appears to be adequate and in compliance with the Colorado Guidelines for Feedlot Runoff Containment. JS522/dgc Enclosures • • SC®78ar s 1 • S • • • �re � rrce fr s pct 1 �1 /cog t.A., • � r`f" I. au � CO E'ogi 9ro P4SCA_. oMAie ___v 3 - 77 r .3,4- or TNsioft S cp_pG 2— / DQ. Pill• 10 � P ' arCt 13osi.c/ . 40• DSO • v i . „C 0733 y 6 • (-1_S 41; C / X 176- - /5, 9%2 s eg r, ?G x / '7S _ / `/, 000 • OS ly co. o `HI 175 ' 117s = / 5, rz s- 3 S 37 0 • / 31 ,c d7a S ; , 7n / 3 / ia70 KC, 9e ° i Sus 7 s 42 , F7 .5-- / 2- O . X l3 / ' r 15, 7z c. 5--• lL n % O : f s� s SC 0731 • 57 a7G �, r, `' r6. ,n 1 9W r �` I 9 / . C oy, r A 1 ip r 4 t 16 r r-A I••- not p 4 / t / em,/0. Cer. / 117ropoS eel' m e W -- I \\ f QOr rP( y • 1 Pr 0/O0V ♦!1~! A• 2 -ine y q, 1 . / ' z bent corra i I . ,. 11 �_ (�� L.-- -_- ..._ ___.___. - - - - _ - 1 l V. _ 1--. --__ -- . . 1 ,U I i w �"� �� I I • r. :: 2 Z I I ‘ _ en I l o ?ropes• e I �" �/3q`r".....so%I 15!1"8 ' 1 { j _ —_ ....--_,_..._ ____---ab— .— .... ,. .I i r i _ _ _ _ _4 • I 11 t j' QorrAj ! urrC. 1 Curra ( ' a.. I . I I .. i •.� � -j I l .. . I Y c '' I l r, - , I I „� I �114.111 • I •• I t.,_ / t 1 — at =ve 3 -- J pp i' e1 N 1 )•Ccr , fir' . O •• �— fr WCK +S :.+'. . ` .au�'� •• __ .. H/NWh+ ?h'i / A� v ,,,,z. a �rr 'C w. cZ�4 r _ fi':;::)Z.4.::::;.;;;.::::.::!.r • 1�Qj� r /fir / r +� v '''''.*::`C i �.4 r r .+ ,//�;• r,72:,.. ,,-,v • i?--- • /06/-O9-e-co-co -ooZ/ ttithi Cca. itket,%kuLd ‘44cti:zziria., \att.c- C.2 Z ee0)14/A AO Se4v,, eta& jail'? 94 • go 'ce- /olo/ Qe -0-ao- 603 Y�.e4.4 9 ce. %.)22.A_z. ��7 ��(o i 104 98/x!O * /clef-029a -00 -0/3 � v' �� )W • /.55�c/ &) d s/o Irk Sedszda2 Ca .0,. tito yolow-a9-0 -00 -66 d 1 ez ez. aawt 55 I✓udl64 , GIS. /`'o 7y o ..3k- gee,/at 0`CO -0/I Net De Ctcwe Sr _. 1 5J 1 ru vG i.._ 3!Led, -- l)ctILLid / ' ,i C.7y 30;d: .4 �t°?¢e_ .� . //a/9. :�di��1 s/.3 Arm '44/o67- 0257,0 viz Oita/Alitoo C��. e /2679Q'J`- `� • Skied", a - sco7s ' tot 6 • DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES I lilt PHONE(303)358.4000,UT.4400 91510th STREET GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 �e COLORADO NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING • The Weld County Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, August 21, 1990, at 1:30 p.m. for the puzpose of considering a Site Specific Development Plan and a Site Review permit for the property described below. Approval of the request may create a vested property right pursuant to Colorado Law. APPLICANT: William Bradley Pickerkand Everdi.na Ann Marie Pickert LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the of Section 28, T4N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado TYPE AND INTENSITY OF PROPOSED USE: Livestock confinement operation (1,000 head dairy with six residences) . LOCATION: South of Weld County Road 42 and east of and adjacent to weld County Road 5. SIZE: 47 acres, more or less The public hearing will be held in the Weld County Commissioners' Hearing Room, First Floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado. Comments or objections related to the above request should be submitted in writing to the Weld County Department of Planning Services, 915 Tenth Street, Room 342, Greeley, Colorado 80631, before the above date or presented at the public hearing on August 21, 1990. Copies of the application are available for public inspection in the Department of Planning Services, Room 342, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado 80631 - Phone - 356-4000, Extension 4400. Ernie Ross, Chaiiman weld County Planning Commission To be published in the New News To be published one (1) time by August 2, 1990 Received by: /4O „.„ Dater " ! �/ G�(`O�.794 �J' �CO78 r IttY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE(303)356x000,EC. I 915 sett:STREET GREELEY,COLORADO soar COLORADO NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Weld County Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, August 21, 1990, at 1:30 p.m. for the puipose of considering a Site Specific Development Plan and a Site Review permit for the property described below. Approval of the request may create a vested property right pursuant to Colorado Law. APPLICANT: William Bradley Pickerfand Everdina Ann Marie Pickert LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the W1 of Section 28, T4N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado TYPE AND INTENSITY OF PROPOSED USE: LivestOck confinement operation (1,000 head dairy with six residences) . LOCATION: South of Weld County Road 42 and east of and adjacent to weld County Road 5. SIZE: 47 acres, more or less The public hearing will be held in the weld County Commissioners' Bearing Room, First Floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado. Comments or objections related to the above request should be submitted in writing to the Weld County Department of Planning Services, 915 Tenth Street, Room 342, Greeley, Colorado 80631, before the above date or presented at the public hearing on August 21, 199O. Copies of the application are available for public inspection in the Department of Planning Services, Room 342, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado 80631 - Phone - 356-4000, Extension 44OO. Ernie Ross, Chairman weld County Planning Commission To be published in the New News To be published one (1) time by August 2, 199O Received by: _ Date: • II sSENDER: ComPrete eternal en e d 2 when additional services are desired. and co plete loser a and 4. Put your address in the"RETURN TO"Space on the reverse side.Failure to do this will prwwtt this card �` from being returned to you.The r�rn rpC9' t'ft"will provide you the nq�Vero ektered�Teri I . Ins q�e of. QQIiyet For additional Fes the tolbwinp services an evaTabrir. fei T fee. _ and check&Wee)ka additional seroba(s)requested. < 0 1. 0 Show to whom.delhrned,date,and addressee's address. 2: 0 Restricted Deliver), (Ewa charm (Edra charge) r` 0 a_ ylei N 3. Arbcls AOdeesssd:to: -.. 4. 0.TICIe -967 7/ _ _ _... (P 47.54 D W 5 it r4` 0 RONALD R AND LUANN ILILVERSON T of Service: fu ¢ d! Z � 19619 WELD COUNTY ROAD 5 U Rs2lnered ❑insured c 0 G.. H o BERTHOUD, CO 80513 lswor o ❑coo ec tt: 5 co ❑ raven MHI ❑Retwn R .D 0 5 5 .a O i f n Yt u..- 0 U O r Always ob�c'e�rin eipwttxe of addresses Ln a r 2 ,��- O V �, ^ ... -._.... _______, + w agent�ne.DATE ocuvERED. O. V W A u- I 5. Si•y r Addressee 8. Addressee's Address(ONLY If %� X 1 - 1 requested and fee paid) CC CZ 0 6 .�i F a 1r 5. •ip ro —Agent .�/ - PS 3817, • ..t .vrcuRo.rasna.ne DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT SSENDER: Complete Items 1 and 2 when additions' ervloss ere daaeed, and complete (Urns 3 and 4. Put youraddeas in Me"RETURN etTTO"Sppeccts on the rower aide.Failure to do thy will prevent this car ' freest beano dtiredrd to you fees the(.fnwill vote yo tM 04mmt a the DeD O, ears t ton nil chick bodes)TO(atldnbnN srvketsl requested.serwdes are avails bls Coiieuit poitmsstar Ta fees �T' 1. ❑ Show to whom delivered,date,and addrsaaas's address. 2. a Reatricred Delivery J a Mara hinge) (area charge) R w ; 3..ArdcNAdAtsaaed;lo:,,,:,,, 4. Article Number ?4 LA W A a a in in PICKERT DAIRY T pe of Service: �� d- IL a_. c Q C/0 BRAD AND EVERDINA PICKERT Red4t I'. ❑Inrned a� i-oz co , 19504 WELD COUNTY ROAD 5 c.rt s`' LJ coo its p , BERTHOUD, CO 80513 Eapnes I!ifelif L.") or��nar p ill b UeW o4 CrCC i {0 Z C Always Obtahi eignetura of Askance, 0 5 w r w G I ,. or spent sn#TE DELIVERED. — Ln F- _,„ a 0 c) O , 5. S td C-vy/y�f 8. Addressee's Address (ONLY if a r` ¢ G V I ,�• JCS V � ��. regarstedwd fee paid) W Ca ,.a o w E• us a g, 2; D. Sip e — ., CC g v X 1y? awawiow 1n c'�. 7. 0 a N� a p a il '"" G. ia A. c..) -• w • PS Porn tv .ua.o.Ro.taeaaans DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT 2C03783 III e -T..__. • SENDER: Complete items 1 and-2 when eddnlenal services w de sired, and complete Items Put your address In the"RETURN TO"Space on the reverse aids.FelWro to do this will prevent this card ' from being returned to you.The m f -II n she enh:o10el. L'FW rti eea t owmo son iCea we aysi a e. au t postmest�p os O MCk («1 fa addkWrwl NrviCa(Y)fe0ussteo, 1. O Shaw to whom delivered,date,end ack r isese's address. 2. ❑ Restri ted Delivery J e-i (Fora Margo (flea Charge) p^ 3. Article Addressed o:,, 4. Article umber 0 W a � 4. ,. 9'207-97� ritpa 4.4, ti: M1 W?-.4. b2 w WELD COUNTY LAND INVESTORS INC T of Service: Ir c a w m a C/0 CAPITAL AG PREP SERVICE LJ Registered ❑Insured ru ;LA - w �' w C/0 CURTIS TALLEY, JR Certified ❑COD P.O. BOX 1302 AUG W Eaproad Mil). ❑Mr�e � 013 W' zp w '" PALESADE, CO 81526 Q o C C2 .-1 CO : -----.-.-..__ {- 'r Ahv.W obtairiilgn:gas of.ddr..ws .A LL„_ ,.] C 6N "--"•." �i or agenterfLanry DELIVERED. In a o r zzF 2, � FIR V v: 5. Signature.—Addreseee `, y i y,?,, J ,8. Adddit'IANdYs Address (ONLY if W b H H A rn w g: X \. f\_ """n ln °rd.11[e Pyld)... O. L2 O n, pd 2 p „ 7 b 6. • nature —Agent n n- 1 �!I t ¢ UUaVp0to !a (3 c X 0.00 4 ,_\. - 00 ,z) O O • w 7. Dote of Delivery •--2I w�� • <sn S U U O. M . - PS Form 3811,Apr. 1989 aRa,O.RO.tess.2aaate DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT • S4ADER: Complete items 1 antl 2 when additional services ere desired, anir00`m a items 3 are 4. Put your address in the"RETURN TO"Space on the reverse side.Failure to do this will prevent this card from being returned td you.The re rn cei f will i he fie f liver e th. data 9f delivery.For Mona ees t c owing services are mar a e, onW t postmaster or ices and check •• (es)(or additions'service's)requested. J U 1. O Show to whom delivered,date,and addressee's address. 2. P Restricted Odium'',4 z (Eare charge) Mora Charlie) 2 zi o N N 3. Article Addressed to:, 4. Article Number o _ ,�_,_,., • qcfa-970(r '-`- RICHARD J AND THEME HORNUNG T of Service: "fire 43 ci o ru w n W s 1227 SW 132ND LANE, /i732 Mewed ii3H SEATTLE, WA 98146 c.ndwa ❑COD Return port cca n,,, cn t _ `t�tsree"Mr', ❑ip Merchendrse J3W r$` n 2 co Q i At obtai/7 Of IslLi) ~a.� cn < i • or agent end GATE DEL ERE�D. iy x `l '" „ $ (g 5. S to Addressee 8. Addressee's Address (O:vLY IJ . O. w y a X kV.' requested and fee pad) ¢ n Ha + 6. Signature.—Agp1t4. U N Q I X I..' N W in,, f a ., m •Pj,�� 1ALo1/5 ?A /90 --_--- - i • SENDER: Complete items 1 and 2 when additional services are desired, and Complete Items 3 and 4. Put your address in the"RETURN TO"Space on the reverse side.Failure to do this will prevent this card • from being returned to you.The re fee�vill�rptiiQR ha niliTtW rho dellvaredSO nd ' the data W e For additions 4 ni ten lolfowmq eerwces a�a el.�ornvlt postmaater a sae ' end oheak)wx(�is additions'aervics(s)requested. J i,. 1. ❑ Show to whom delivered,.date,end addressees address. 2. 17.4Restricted Delivery Q4. (Earn CharR) (Fore charge) o— .e m S 3. Anab Addressed m: 4. Article Q8w wv � -94.9 - D" W a a G ii-ri! Z Q RODNEY S AND JOYCE M PFEIFF T�.pa of Service: • a g v m COd n 1554 WELD COUNTY ROAD 401 L Registered ❑',awed r Qw 6 g o z 8 BERTHOUD, CO SOS 13 g❑t1 E�Mail ❑❑coo Return Rea�r'pptf for Me1GhMdls4 Ln Q LL v AIwM odtw�lp4turo Of addresNs in F` z L.) Q ; _ - or agent and .ELMERE°, a wS w O O 5. Sign re —AOdr 8'. Add •dr (ONLY if W YrfO _,E X j� yy i y Q.� ¢ in S o 8•_ gMture=fY6ent j n Z o H 0. I� ',e1-/;2?- .....Y�X/5 • O rn im rd ail,. • BENDER: Complete Reins 1 and 2 when additional services are desired, and Complete items CL 0:I J end 4. Put your address In the"RETURN TO"Space on the reverse side.Failure to do this will prevent this card —- from returned t0 T rq{t�m ra�erp�tqa will of She• li�.�ra�t0 A�n�ae�Qo�pp}}delry�in Fat--Mona'(use the t&Owing're??.Corso postmastx is f s . andclraCT<box(ea)for additional sec iceis)requested. . 1. ❑ Shaw to whom delivered.date.and addressee's address. 2. ❑ Restricted Delivery (Etrru Cherie) _ _ Mora thaw; 3, AMC',Addressed t0: ..mod. Article Number . J .. , 9 8 Aal -.96,e a y HARRY R AND VERA CROWE, SR T pe of Service: 2 a i , df�0[7LEVARD end ❑Insured 55 TRUMAN .,D o x +se ❑coo T LL s OAKLAND, NJ 07436 .O ices,Mall ❑ Return id rcchnao» o re) q U Alwsye obtain egneture of addresses go W r d th : wanes and DATE DELIVERED. CC gC W E w W 5.- r9 r Addr��.ice�� 8. �ssee's Address (ONLY if „D Q,o, > O X� � seed and t< vn a=g A m z 8. nature —Agent yr0w33 za X t�V 36� a Q r 1 z � \ 7. De=eyf Debits(/6 90 p›p4.I tCe ai �3 l` �( u� d 1„ , PS Form 3811,Apr. 1989 egs.6►.O,Ibis M4fa DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT rn Off.:,.. . RESOLUTION RE: APPROVE HANDICAPPED CHILDREN'S CONTRACT BETWEEN COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority o£ administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board has been presented with a Contract between the Colorado Department of Health and the weld County Health Department concerning the Handicapped Children's Program, and WHEREAS, the term of said Agreement is from Sepetmber 1 , 1990, through June 30, 1991, with the further terms and conditions being as stated in the Agreement, and WHEREAS, after review, the Board deems it advisable to approve said Agreement, a copy being attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the Handicapped Children's Program Contract between the Colorado Department of Health and the Weld County Health Department be, and hereby is, approved. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that the Chairman be, and hereby is, authorized to sign said Contract. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 29th day of August, A.D. , 1990. Adei/th BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: WELD OUNT�Y,, COLORADO Weld County Clerk to the Board �i 'Snit ne R. Brantner, Chairman BY:S/�,f,a,�7� /nUl elA) a ge Kennedy, Pro-Tem Deputy (Jerk to the Board APPRO D AS TO FORM: n�anc�e Har ert c.yi, Kirtty c� unty Attorney EXCUSED DATE OF SIGNING - AYE Gordon E. Lacy 900785 WELD COD•NTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT CONTRACT SUMMARY HANDICAPPED CHILDREN'S PROGRAM (HCP) Contracting Agency: Colorado Department o£ Health Term of Contract: September 1, 1990 through June 30, 1991 • Amount: $3,404 Difference From Previous Contract: Increase of $369 over prior contract. County Citizens Affected: Children in need o£ specialized preventive health care. Program Summary: Funding covers the cost o£ nursing time spent with HCP children. The activities given to the HCP patients include casefinding, assisting with registrations, doing home visits, clinic management and follow-up to children who require intensive care. Benefit to Health Department: Provides reimbursement for one of our programs. Responsibility of Health Department: The Weld County Health Department is responsible for providing the nursing services as listed above within the guidelines set by Colorado Department of Health. County Fiscal Impact: Amount received is a slight increase over what was budgeted for 1991. 9C 0785 • Yonne-AC-02A(R 1/Da) DEPARTMENT-OR AGENCY NUMBER 260000 CONTRACT ROUTING NUMBER 9/-54/ r CONTRACT THIS CONTRACT.Made this 24th day of August 19., 90 ,by and between the State of Colorado for the use and benefit of the DeosttmRnttor HEALTH 4210 E. 11th Avenue, Denver, Colorado Ge hereinafter referred to as the State, and-' Weld County Health Department 1516 Hospital Road G��lev Colorado 80631 hereinafter ,tefetred to aS the contractor, WHEREAS,authority exists in the Law and Funds have been budgeted,appropriated and otherwise nude availablk and .. a sufficient unenctonbered balance thereof remains available for payment in Food Number 1001 , G/L Account Number 53367 ,Contract Encumbrance Number/f1374:625 ;and WHEREAS, required approval, clearance and coordination has been accomplished from and with appropriate agencies; and WHEREAS, the State has formulated a comprehensive State Plan to carry out the Handicapped Children's Program/Children With Special Health Care Needs (HCP), funded by Federal Health and Human Services funds; and WHEREAS, said comprehensive State Plan and Federal budget allocates funds to be utilized for the implementation of the program through various agencies in order to provide these health care services to the people of Colorado; and WHEREAS, the Contractor is considered by the State to be an appropriate agency to provide the services to the program as herein set forth. NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed that for and in consideration of their mutual promises to each other, hereinafter stated, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. The Contractor will provide the following services on behalf of the Handicapped Children's Program: A. Casefinding and community outreach as described in the Public Health Nursing, Process Standards for Handicapped Children's Program. Attachment A, which by this reference is made a part hereof. B. Management of existing RCP clinics; participation with HOP ` Clinics and patients as described in the Public Health Nursing, Process Standards for Handicapped Children's Program. C. Evaluation of appropriateness of caseload and other related HCP activities as described in the Public Health Nursing, Process Standards for Handicapped Children's Program. 515; r / Loa(( Page 1 of S pages /y �J(/ !Y 395.53-01.1011 *(See i tommms on mine of Mn page) /Oo /65 .. • D. Provide case management services to selected HCP patients as described in the Public Health Nursing, Process Standards for Handicapped Children's Program. 2. The Contractor shall serve a caseload of 274 children to include clinic and nursing services. 3. The Contractor will submit a progress report, as requested by the State, due by August 1, 1991. 4. The Contractor will cooperate with and provide all requested records regarding recipients for whom services were provided under this contract at the time that periodic chart audits occur. 5. The Contractor will submit data to the State utilizing the ADD's:5 data system. 6. The Contractor shall not charge for services reimbursed under this contract to any party other than the Handicapped Children's Program, Medicaid, or eligible commercial insurance of a recipient. ` 7. Title V funds may not be used to pay for any item or service (other than an emergency item or service) furnished by an individual or entity convicted of a criminal offense under the Medicare or any State health care program (i.e. , Medicaid, Maternal and Child Health, or Social Services Block Grant programs). 8. The State will, in consideration of said services by the Contractor, cause to be paid to the Contractor an amount not to exceed THREE THOUSAND_FOUR HUNDRED FOUR DOLLARS AND ZERO CENTS ($3.40 .00) in the following manner: Upon receipt of signed monthly statements, submitted in duplicate, to FAMILY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES DIVISION, HANDICAPPED CHILDREN'S PROGRAM requesting reimbursement, one reimbursement form provided by the state, copy attached and by this reference made part herof as Attachment B, and conditioned upon affirmation by the State Handicapped Children's Program that services and reports were rendered in accordance with this contract. 9. The Contractor will not charge for services those individuals of families at or below the official poverty line as defined by the Office of Management and Budget in accordance with Title V, Section 501 (B) (2) and Section 505 (2) (d). The 100 percent of poverty income guideline for farm or non-farm families is currently at $7,730 for a family of 2; $9,690 for a family of 3; $11,650 for a family of 4; $13,610 for a family of 5; $15,570 for a family of 6; $17,530 for a family of 7; and $19,490 for a family of 8. For families of more than eight, add $1,960 for each additional member. 10. The term of this contract is beginning September 1, 1990 and ending June 30, 1991. Page 2 of 5 pages COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH - hereinafter, under the General Provisions referred to as "Health". GtNERAL PROVISIONS 1. The parties of this contract intend that the relationship between them contemplated .by this contract is that of employer-independent contractor. No agent, employee or servant of Contractor shall be or shall be deemed to be an employee, agent or servant of Health. Contractor will be solely and entirely responsible for its acts and the acts of its agents, employees, servants and subcontractors during the performance of this contract. 2. At all times during the performance of this contract, the. Contractor shall strictly adhere to all applicable federal and state laws that have been or may hereafter be established. 3. Contractor authorizes Health to perform audits and to make inspections for the purpose of evaluating performance under this contract. 4. Either party shall have the right to terminate this agreement by giving the other party thirty days notice by registered mail, return receipt requested. If notice is so given, this agreement shall terminate on the expiration of the thirty days, and the liability of the parties hereunder for the further performance of the terms of this agreement shall thereupon cease, but the parties shall not be relieved of the duty to perform their obligations up to the date of termination. 5. This agreement is intended as the complete integration of all understandings between the parties. No prior or contemporaneous addition, deletion, or other amendment hereto shall have any force or effect whatsoever, unless embodied herein in writing. No subsequent novation, renewal, addition, deletion, or other amendment hereto shall have any force or effect unless embodied in a written contract executed and approved pursuant - to the State Fiscal Rules. 6. If this contract involves the expenditure of federal funds, this contract is contingent upon continued availability of federal funds for payment pursuant to the terms of this agreement. Contractor also agrees to fulfill the requirements of Office of Management and Budget Circulars A-87 and A-102 or A-110, whichever is applicable. 7. To be considered for payment, billings for reimbursement pursuant to this contract must be received within 60 days after the period for which reimbursement is being requested and final billings on the contract must be received by the State Health Department within 60 days after the end of the contract term. 8. If applicable, Local Match is to be submitted on the monthly reimbursement statements, in the column provided, as required by the funding source. 9. If Contractor receives $25,000.00 or more per year in Federal funds in the aggregate from Health, Contractor agrees to have an annual audit, by an independent certified public accountant, which meets the requirements of Office of Management and Budget Circular A-128. If Contractor is required to submit an annual indirect cost proposal to Health for review and approval, Contractor's auditor will audit the proposal in accordance with the requirements of OMB Circular A-87. Contractor agrees to furnish one copy of the audit reports to the Health Department Accounting Office within 30 days of their issuance, but not later than nine months after the end o£ Contractor's fiscal year. Contractor agrees to take appropriate corrective action within six months of the report's issuance in instances of noncompliance with Federal laws and regulations. Contractor agrees to permit Health or its agents to have access to its records and financial statements as necessary, and further agrees to retain such records and financial statements for a period of three years after the date of issuance of the audit report. This contract does contain Federal funds as of the date it is signed. This requirement is in addition to any other audit requirements contained in other paragraphs within this contract. 10. If applicable, Contractor agrees to not use Federal funds to satisfy Federal cost sharing and matching requirement unless approved in writing by the appropriate Federal Agency. Page 3 of . 5_ Pages Rev. 06/06/88 Veen 6-Aco2s SPECIAL PROVISIONS CONTROLLER'S APPROVAL I. This Contract shall not he deemed valid until it shall have been approved by the Controller of the Sute of Colorado or such assistant as he may designate.This provision is applicable to any contract involving the pay- ment of money by the Suter FUND AVAILABILITY 2. Financial obligations of the State payable after the current fiscal year are contingent upon funds for that purpose being appropriated, budgeted and otherwise made available. BOND REQUIREMENT 3. If this contract involves the payment of more than GIYy thousand dollars for the o nstniction,erection. repair.maintenance,or improvement of any building•road,bridge,viaduct.tunnel,excavation or other public works for this State,the contractor shall,before entering the performance of any such work included in this con- vect duly execute and deliver to and file with the official whose signature appears below for the State.•good and sufficient bond or other acceptable surety to be approved by said official in a penal sum not less than one- half of the total amount payable by the temts of this contract-Such bond shall be duly executed by■Qualified corporate surety,conditioned for the due artd faithful performance of the contract,and in addition,shall provide that if the convector or his subcontractors fail to duly pay for any labor,materials,team hire,Sustenance,pro visions,provendor or other supplies used or consumed by suchContracWror his subcontractor in performance of the work contracted to be done,the surety will pay the stuns in an amount not exceeding the sum specified in the bond,together with interest at the rate of eight per cent per annum.Unless such bond.when so required.is executed,delivered and filed,no claim in favor of the contractor wising under this contract shall be audited, allowed or paid.A certified or cashier's check or a hank money order payable to the Treasurer of the Stated . Colorado may be accepted in lieu of a bond. This provision is in compliance with 38-26-106 CRS. MS amended. INDEMNIFICATION • 4. To the extent authorized by law,the contractor shall indemnify,save and hold harmless the Sat;its employees and agenu,against any and all claims,damages,liability and dour awards i ncludingcosta expenses• and attorney fees incurred as a result of any act or omission by the contractor,or is employees,agents.subcon- tractors,or assignees pursuant to the terms of this contract DISCRIMINATION AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION 5. The contractor agrees to comply with the lever and spirit of the Colorado Antidiscrimination Act of 1957, as amended,and other applicable law respecting discrimination and unfair employment practices(24-34402. CRS 1982 Replacement Vol.),and as required by Executive Order,Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action, - dated April 16, 1975.Pursuant thereto, the following provisions shall be contained ill all State Contracts or sub-contracts. During the performance of this contract,the contractor epees as follows: (I) The Convector will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race,creed,color,national origin,sex,marital status,religion,ancestry,mend or physiel handicap,or age.The contractor will take affirmative action m insure that applicants are employed,and that employees are vested during employment,without regard to the above mentioned characteristics.Such action shall include,but not be limited to the following employment.upgrading.demotion,or transfer.recruitment or recruitment advertising lay-offs or terminations;rates of pay or other forms of compensation;and selec- tion for training,including apprenticeship.The contractor agrees to post in conspicuous places,available to employees and applicants for employment,notices to be provided by the contracting officer setting roan provisions of this non-discrimination clause. . (2) The convector will,in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the contractor,state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, creed, color, national origin, sex, marital status, religion, ancestry. mental or physical handicap,or age. (3) The contractor will send to cash labor union or representative of workers with which he has collective bargaining agreement or other contract or understanding,notice to be provided by the contracting o@cer, advising the labor union or workers representative of the contractor's committment under the Executive Order,Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action,dated April 16.1975.and of the rules,regulations,and • relevant Orders of the Governor. (4) The contractor and labor unions will furnish all information and reports required by Executive Order, Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action of April 16.1975.and by the fillet,regulations and Orders of the Governor,or pursuant thereto.and will permit saes,to his books,records•and accounts by the con- vatting agency and the office of the Governor or his designee for purposes of investigation to ascertain '. compliance with such roles,regulations and orders. (5) A labor organization will not exclude any individual otherwise qualified from full membership rights in such labor organization,or expel any such individual from membership in-ueh labs organization or dis- criminate against any of its members in the full enjoyment of work opportunity,because of race,Creed- color. sex, national origin-or ancestry. (6) A labor organization,or the employees or members thereof will not aid•abet,incite,compel or coerce the doing of any act defined in this eomract to be discriminatory or obstruct or prevent any person from complying with the provisions of this contract or any order issued thereunder,or attempt,either directly or indirectly. to commit any act defined in this contract to be discriminatory. 395-53-01-1022 page 4 of 5. Pages Revised 11-85 , Form 6-AC-02C (7) In the ever.%of the contractor's non-eomplance with the non•dnenmmation clauses of this con• tract or with any of such rules.regulations.Of orders,this contract may be caneelled.eavismated or WY pended in wnok or 10 part and the contractor may be declared nnehgitee for fuller State commas in accordance with procedures. authorized in Executive Order. Equal Opriceninny a�� nauve Action of April 16.1975 and the rules,regulauons.or order promulgated tri such other sancuans as may be imposed and remedies as may be invoked as provided Executive Order.Equal Opppntumty and Affirmative Action of April 16.1975.or by rules.regularuss or otters promulgated in accordance therewith,or as otherwise provided by law. (81 The contractor will include the provisions of paragraph(1)through(8)in every sub-contract and subcontractor purchase order unless exempted by rules. regulation. or orders issued pursuant to . Executive Order.Equal Opportunity all Affirmative Action of April 16.1973.so that such provisions will be binding upon each subcontractor or vendor.The contractor will take such action wnth respeCt w any sub-contratung or withax order as the cots nuns agency may direct,as a means of enforcing such provisions.including sanctions for non-compliance:provided.however.that in Use event the con- tigation with the ontractor or tr as a result actor such becomes involved ytheconvictin threatenednc ,the contractor tra for may request the State of Colorado to enter ' m such direction by gage Y. into such litigation to protect the interest of the Sate of Colorado. COLORADO LABOR PREFERENCE rence of Colorado wo ks within thesSu of$a are undertaken hereunde02,CRS for teand are financed ma whole or in an by St are applicable to this ore funds.ntraa if public b. When a conswouon contract for a public protect is to be awarded to a bidder,a resident bidder shall be glowed a preference against a ndrtesident bidder from a sum or foreign country equal to the Meet=oven Or required by the state or foreign country in which the non-resident bidder ts a resider.Nita u determined by the officer responsible for awarding the bid that compliance with this subsection.06 may cause dinar of federal funds n which would others's=be available or would otherwise be inconsistent with ed. requirements the of federal ar m aUmtna the: w.this sub- section shall be suspend but only to rue extend necessary prevent denial of inconsistency with federal requirements(section 8-19-101 all IO2.CRS). GENERAL uant thereto dull be applied in the 7. The haws of the State of Colorado and rules and regulations issued pure • interpretauon.execution all enforcement of this contract.-Any provision of this contract whether or not Weer- porated herein by reference which provides for arbitration by any extrayudicial body or person or which is other- wise in conflict with sad laws.rules and regulations shall be considered null and void.Nothing contained ul n an« provision incorporated herein by reference which purports to nepte Nis or any Other Special provis • in part shall be valid or enforceable or available in any action at law whether by way of complaint,defense or other- wise.Any provision rendered null and void by the operation of this ptOvnion will not invalidate the ternatdder of this contract to the extent the the contract is capable of exeCutidn. 8. At all times dung the performance of this Contract the Contractor shall strictly adhere to all&poling: federal and state laws• rules and regulations Wt have been or may heftsher be established. 9. The signatories hereto aver that they are familiar with 18-&301.et.seq..(Bribery and Corrupt influences) and 1&8.401.et.seq.,(Abuse of Public OMca.CRS 1978 Replacement Vol.,all that no violation of such pro- visions is present- - 10. The sipoamnes aver that to their knowledge.no sate employee has•personal or beneficial interest what•. soevtt in the service or proper desenbed herein% , IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Contract on the day first above written. Contractor: (Full Legal Name) STATE OF COLORADO • }CC%a" `c ROY ROM mGOV Oct . _ ells for the By v maeCtq. Position(Tittle) ChEdIma Board a Collty Cemthssi0°Hsa Weld Canty . DEPARTMENT sr...--...r..r......i o,—me, op HEALTH - n / / WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT of COMO( •) 1 ,' �, 1 j° / Zr:�i�! Attest(S ;# •/ V V , B7: _ �' ^` `? Randolph C don, .D. ,, M.P.H. �Ry« ...a...,. I...A Director Taw APPROVALS �a n••••1:►;,%lap, f CONTRO . ATTORNEY GEN //► ALL BY j By • D ID M. E • Pte General L fan l AtornServices y Genera . 1, ( General Legal Services • . PROGRAM APPROVAL: ... 5 5 .... , r w .. �.. �._..._ . . ao as . o V M O Y VI y. n tRiVX C Y J O ✓ C!. e o C , 14 Go 0 O. 0 6 N a 3 8 .. C " m M M 'O • ✓ 01 a CO r O y C • 6 H I-. 01 .. A J G Y CO 0 .C a ✓ wee d a at v as is A . as x e A N d g ff O A b 00 F = a C e 8 e M O Y OC 'O a X Y w 0 car a o °"M. E+ O 0w V v Z p� N 0 Mr Mr Z a O 44 F O F ("4 F •• 'V M O V K f0 O O (q Y w w • u I N at• e is o F CO F e Y V) O O b CC o V 0 C n aq O Y 7 T + y •.r ✓ is O. M 41 Q. M O OC +. 2 b M ✓ V e F V .+ Y V O. 4' v x .ec w •r o Cw e ' c_) e e w Is W Y M V as o c w b O >.. cla 6 ✓ W ea e d V h 0.0 O Q F .~+ M e A - O • - O.O u ✓ W V O. O o at w x c v e at w c S e Y V e •F • Z V •0 Y V i d M O O Z c c.-• e _ 0M 0 V .. CO O O A t V • Y ai A0 GP y e � nof OS A-1 hi C Z Y C - e t p� > xc eod � oY CO OG i d 'O N •.• O d t••• w r a .C .C C l• C w •0 O1 Y U O )1. ID O M 00 w g b 0 - W .0 .C O .. Y [r V •-1 .. ✓ Y Y e M Z a T Cl .3 W J✓Q w 4 V O OiyG V V O �'O 2 p u d C M O. v Ppi O O ✓ V e .w C] V Y w Y O .-1 .4 •-• M 9.✓ e M .T 44 0 t VI c� a me Y � .CrYo e 'c 5 x 003 mageo.C a Za b O X 7 z F a d• N 3 L r 0. a F W A •-• A a at F wit < I C O ...IC 10 ...• O 4 CO 04 N O 4 .a •0 X a S.• N N U .a ..r OC O U 4 4 b0 W O F CV 4 x L. a L a) Z .�. . c °0 ® .+ .. co el 00 Q el CO CO ° ed z ag.. +Nay C C N .0�• 7 I. .c O l: N O et 00 a. b0 4a Q.T. • •C N • 0N C O L. 4) aM el el C.' N el V • N el 4 CC W ... •. A .a •.1 C .O U T N L. O 0. I 0 0y) v'O O A U ECl O. 6 N U •4 •Ai. L •7 .4 N 'C 0 C ro 0 O eV tO ++ �+ 7 O' cc O as > a ,° r•0. . .n el U .n Q) N A N L N0 CC N w •1 A 0 Ca '0 .C O C '7 ••• V .C N A 0) a 14 a r N O GG .a r• O p1 WO 4 +a C0 a N ID a 110.0 4) •0 a p..,4 4 4) ••l V N C •• ... .4 N T.O 2 'C 'O •• a > 2 ••• 0 N T N el b0 �y N N r/ O O > L. 0 ••G COC7 • 2 T Y0 C COC CC .a L. N TS N T •—1 4) .. N •.l N a a C O 4 Q4) Z - at 4 >,a T U O ro el 'l7 CO i+ f0 .ri eel 7 O N •n l0 .•l •. r+ 'C CO N .a C a Cu 0 as a a 0 < 2• .C a 10 r. >I II.; N •.1 4) 0 01 C N .. 03 C a Z Q c .0 Q ma .n ro .a c ....l.n o a4 N ° 0 P .a •.C CD •r1 •.161 f.•r/ C .0 W .4 X +a O V S y W N .a a m U N N N • � 01 6 O N Z tX 01 0 0) N .a •n N .a CO N a el 0 U U C r-• b4 000 N U oo 0 0 O • O b0•.. .. O 6 P E 4 N cog yy C p O A a A 'O < N •O H N b0 qq N N U •.. U 03 ho on 'S' F J "! ,q W • O bO C N 4 A •n .a •. 5. el O M W •n el 01 E CX rw q O es el CO le N 0) .a el 0 el el.-1 W 'O 4 4 •C I-0 to oo f. E 7 0 'O el W t0 W •.. • •.l 4 el N .n 4) N 03 C N N .a < f., U C N .• •0 C 2 N @ a 2 > 2 N . . .a N a a W Y <. 4 0 W 0 TO C N N g ••. of .+ N Q) S. • CO V a 0 ro ° a .I 4) U U •.O.1 W b0 0 v 4 U .a b4 � a el 00 0 •n T N L. a•ee a .c 4 .a .+..N a ro 4) U C '4 00 CO 'C 4) i 1-4 CO H .a 7 4) •n L •N 44 V ••• N I. CO U .C CO ••• N .• .a 0. I-3 C a OA a 0) .a M a '0 .n >..C 0 .a .. CO as C C 7 C • Cal P 1:1N N C e7 .-• .• 7 C w C N a N U I. C I. •n •.. •,y III O. U W MO U C .X 'O Ct = U V < S < 0 < -) C.) 0 UZ S ••• U O a . • O: a C N Ch d• h r•i N a < U a k O 03 8 O a U •0bo oaaW < a C N 0.M < vd « ro °s o Nro ..+ `fix P. '° O • •I 1-.00 ®e• a a a o O a Q .a CI 0. L CM r. C •7 t..0 3 a l 1.5 2€i5 7 •.1 4 U O W O C. C M U•••.li E 5 0 0 4)) a. ' . cN C T �a. Q O . N .a C op U .a ~ q C4) L I—. 0 X '000 s°. @6 N •. CC.. U .C ro .0 0 .0 X >C .a .d F Q .0 V GO CO Ca < ._7 U < co • le • • N N .+ L L C U d d • 0. D' 0 0 0..N U .+ .n R +. ..1 a.-i N O 01 U - N .4 • L U G. G OM N •O. b0 W d = • F yy" •� •-•7 u CO 0-q 04. N v-.Ni Z m U.F 0J .Y ••• L 7 O N 01 •N .M � u uma> o •o ro A c CL O "4 t0 > •1 J.• L ++ L N 7x ((�� N .-I > L 0J A C O •.• O L 8 qq 8 O N N O.) N w -L 0 7 O O O 4 dd x a h K ••• ++ O. 1' W L 3 U U • .C N 414 --• O L • •+ C C ++ 3 to>. O a .. O —to *.U 3 O N �4) •N .• . ••C+ U 4. 01 • C •--• O) U •O +• L ..• N +• u C •. O N N 'C ••. L d 0) .+ •n • > a N 't° .C U a1 0 0) W •.4 as b0 C 3 • ++ 'C N 7 .+ L •c by 8 4+ - (0 L L q t0 >••1410 L d O' U O g O '9 u ld X A 43 0 0 •.l � L O in O N •.• •••• N A 1 2 •-, 00 N 0) ••• N C.C O.. N ++ 00 L U N L C N L ••• U U COI C U +• 01 C. co., N A Q 0) - •n 0., 0) U CO O A r - c ••• N 7 L 7 0 COO Of. 'd .•• •r N .•r •N 4. U L .+ ... 4• O 0 C .C C ••• Ow L •-• O 0 0 N C 'a C O CO 0. -PO U ++ U 0.'C •n Z co •C ••• U .w L 4. C U N c U .••) •.r 'O co L CO . a p .C 0) •". Q O •N •n 0) 0) O C C q 0. N C C •0 U .C 07 U O 4. R0 r+ w L U 'O N ••• •0 C Qi +• c •. .+ U 'O 01 0 O L ••-• .C q b . C +. N • C .N A A N C 01 0412 x A C L Uac) co C ..• 07 C N M b0.• N U UU S U b0 7 r+ 07 P. 0 A 0) U C a L •g O .0 U 0: 7 0 O. .•4 ••• U L 01 3 •w N 0 •w 0 7 •-1 •0 ..• a+ •0 4 07 L N N N N +. N S L A i •0 > C 0> .+ L L 3 44 L C L. Qs. VV 00 co o. 7 L ' o L L •- A W O co N •-• 0 O 0 N 0) W 0. O+-. •O •0 O O .C U !0 u W U w +.• •O 7 4. 0 > O O •4 • •• t ••. y +• ••y N 6 N O L .C L N A '0 ... d ..i 01 .+ O U .+ 7 .+ -• 'O • 07 .+ N 'e O 0) .+ 01 q 0 4 •C > ••• O O 1O .�-• 0) W •4. 0 U 0 00 C 01 A •.. U L 3 C 7 01 ♦+ ..• O C 0).C O F N O •O •n U 01 L U 3 O 0 •n L Q) • L •C ••• .C N O G •-•• C • C (6 ••, 01 L A L W 07 L +' C N .•• 0 >. A r. •n( M it ft () .. 0 b0 w •0 0} .C O JC 'C U .% C N • M •4 E. +•• r N CO i+ N C ..N 0000 b0 U0 L. 0 7 I F •. •.1 ••1 U 0 2 ••• N co 00 •••••• 4144 C ••• '0 m b0 Ong U C N C.) •n +.- C 3 N • '0 ••• U •• 01 00 b L 01 0 0 4 C 3 + f5• O -0 3 L 7 ›. N 4. .n •0 -w ..+ -n +• w+ R •0 •.• O 3 C .+ A ••• 00 w U U .0 •n O > •• > 03•O C 07 0) N ,C •n ++ L O) +• @ C C7 x E. 01 .-• MI ••1 •N L U• 0) O) O N r v to O gg d @ 0) L 0) b0 Z Y 07 O -r• W N U •A .0 � E 8 .C A •n C O O .•i 0. 0. U N ••• .c U ..-cc.) C N N N C, .. A A 1w L Y. •. 0) •• 03 N >, q) u L C .M ..• +. 1+ Y •.• (0 l0 S WO 'a) FL U • ® C R O• .C 0J N 4 A O ti t C 01 07 ad O ••• L. y L •0J 01 .C 4. O O O L O A Z F C •. "C c030041 3 0 U +• -C L O.4 3 3 0 0 4. = A +• O W O a O. V ++ M ••4 N co V' A g 07 4. L 7 A b0 O O O0 N (0 C -:-. L M U I N N 0/ 04 W C U 7' , U M ti E C b00 N U • 0J C6 ••+ L g N .▪ U•. NUX 0 N .r •p ... .T• • O •0 ••• C •-• •w L ••• C CO a 0. 4-0 0f U ••4• A 77 u <L O N 5 k •w . 0 a fn U •U b0 .• a+ A• 3 C 0.4) -0 •4 gp O x N* u c � O .c r..° o C1 . ••• F •• U4+ 're 4. C CA .. • .-1 U CC CC • 5 I t H O 0 ' •.61 0. t0. .N 'd � A IW •0 A C +' 0 0 W C OW U m 4. 7 W f. .•• CO • r. T O A U W 044 OZO 0410 +1 +• 41 '•• M O .+ +-• 0 .d La •r• X C W C r+ •r..1 •••1k w N 1. . 'V b0 CO A ., O a 0 7 r-• M 4. 0 7 C C 0 • 0 • w 0 Z 4.1 '0 ..• C W O O r. W C •r1 W .C O!' 4. & 0 •.+ W C 0 O 0 C. O 7 0 a C .r• .+ 3024-104C 0.4 O .0 O co++ T q O 0 0 .+ C 'O ••• C ••• •••• H .✓ U a C a 0 V • .W CO L' O •r1 C .•-• 'W Oil C N 0 O 'O 0 O U >• C O O •r• C 00 0 U CO 6•• 4•• 0 L r• 0• V U a 0 •p r. V ++ .+ 00 C U •� W 0 W W 0 2 a' 0 0 6. 0 C '10 W 0 aO C C 4. - O .•• A 7 r. L, .+ r N A V .+ •r• 7 0 7 r• O. 0 7 r+ a 7 '7 W a 1-. 0 2 m N r-1 C 44 a al (p� 0 .~i C W 0 0) G 'O G R'.. N T ••pppp,, 1• U O U 7 .+ E .0 O CC U @ [A U W 0 7 4°. ^.. ' .4 X O 2 C •4 .' O A 0. 0 .0 N y U .C .r+ -.• .+ >> N L. O if (2 6 0 W '3 m 0 E C 0 0 0 .0' O N r•. � •'1 .•y 0.44 a 0 'p '0 I •V O 0 T 7 CO w 0 G r0 10 U O1. 1.4 .r1 44 N 0000 0 .4 0 L. •.. W C r. O r-I N ,C 0 t0 X 4. •••• b0 U N • W •C V 7 0 .0 0 0 .NC •L '0 m 9� > •.0. •,Ni A y C 't7 )4 m a 0 U .1 .. .+ 4 C .� O ^ 0 U r• 'C @ 4 rol 0 O 60 0 g 0 'C 4• C '00 LO X V•r C O W C U 1- ••� A — C ° •64 •r• L W N 0 0 0 7 U 0 ••• 1. 0 7 r+ W 7 ••• O .1 +• 7 0 .' O 0 N > 3 RI a20 ^w 4. O ++ Or• U ..I0 C .4 h0 X0 .+ 34 .0 .. 0 m X 0•.i C ~ 6 0 0. ON1 m '00 Q1 'e0.4 lii •0 0 O .,Ci G• y v .y 0 • N• •rf > •n L. .+ C. ••I U .. +1 0 L. N 7 LI n 1 U 1• N 0 0 0 0 'O N U 0 '„� bd .p W 0 0 W a 7 W N q1. '3 N 0 .0+ \ '1 0 .• 2 060, 0 a 4 2 +A1 1. L 0 N ••K fi 0Vj Lar e� U b0 O 0. 7 0 b0`-' a y, >. C A y N 0 O pp > C01 r/•'� 'v o 6 • 2 •n 'b 001 `� in a ° N 101 0 w L. 0 ro m•°L. 4 � ro4 14 G• 0r U0 O N 4 '00 1. W aN .' U r 7 AgriO O U] 0 •r• N O a+' M 7 b0 0 1. C p, N g O O .. U 4110.0 V7 ti c) 'D C .in .+ 0 C •4 0 U C >. /. 7 0 W •• .C 'C '7 H 0 L. C W E. ° °I.• .CC W 3 U •M .M .i '° C •M c0 W L W Q 1- ' 0 C N .w r era 0 COL 0. W .7i 4. 1. W M r.i r+ 4-1 0 O r. M C ••• W • •ti •N N •N 4J U A +• 0 +• 01 0 . 0 4• •r• W 7 O C L 0 M ..1 W F. U C 0 'O C 0 ..C 0 a• T•a 1. rr Np t• 4. O L. 7 0) .r1 ••• 7 N U .n 7 U 0 0 '7 •r( '0 0) ..4 N ++ O V at. I F 1 g0 0 a 0 G ++ rr N (O0} .a O' r1 S. r. 7 CO 0 CO K U O 0 0B la W "4 V C U W 0 1 • 14 O O ° L. 0 .C A C C 0 0 4) •W a y'L 444 •CI C`' 0 ,q 2 W O •° J T U C 'C 4. +I a 44 }O W Po d) X N 0 •r1 O N 'p Vi L 000 0 7 O U 1y••1 7 •'S a G ^ .Y. •r1 O ..r .•• +.• O 41 N /. •'a•• r0. O yN 4O .6 m N •C CO t +s L. WO i ,-• a N U U r• •4 .r( r. O 7 a L 0) U WW t• U 1. ., ••i O 4 O W 'O 0 V 0 L. 0 a 'O X > O <J OE E O N ••• 0 0 0 >. C A 0 A > c 4. A O7 .0 7 0 O. 7 " 0 0 0 0 .0 O .00 .044 .44) 00C -n -r. U W W O .+ W .-1 .'C H N O' N •-1 M .+ CC N U E•1 m 3 4. E• 0 Ag v •-• .-I r• yy T W O 0 O C) CO Cu A 44� V• CO CO by 'CO N N C'• 0 .a O .w w O •-• 0 0 C C a 0 ++ 7 O N 7 0 r. A C O 0,4 es 0 G U v • ' U o w r•• b b0 0 . v u c a Cm..-4 ~ ° a W at u� a". o ° .0p7 y L.O W ° C ��C N nO 6--• L >. 0 U > OO 00 W g L. 0 ' O U L. L."0 .w X IWJ � G A 0Y TJ W if .� 0,.� co . > e •••1 W CC I-3 10 ° m 0 ... .4•.+ 2 � 0 O.•-• tL 0 •.4 W • 0.+1 N M r. O 1-t � s 0 , C C 5N m M 0 M ac a L N L. 6 U ..-. • C g 0 0'-• tot. tO 4. M q U l u U N .n M M .n > m • >1 u .6-1 ••• C $10 100 O r%. L W 0 >. W U t•. C 0 O N C ❑ u •p t0•.. .• m 0 •n 4. 0 >+ •.• n 0 cq g u .C .0 L M •n .+ O L > 7 e N +• M 0 * L .C 0004410 V U C 0 •.1 u m .c ..I •n N >. L a V m II'0 0 0 0 2 u E C O .C g c •.. .+ M O u 4. 0 0 O d U ••• • u to A 4 m m 0 m 0 O •n .) m .• O 1.1 •n •C •w .~i N U U 0 U 'p O L C u u y C •u.1 '00 N r r u;Q O � pN � O U 3 F N C L -70 0 L O O u L O M C m j.. - N ❑ • U' 'p a•> 0 'p •N o •n SJ 01 0 o a a Y0 .9 7 u L •n •� m 'p 0) O •p A .c •n 'p O m u 'p b0 Y h 4+ m 0 td C. p. L N •n .C '0 O ' u >. 0 > e0.•. .CI 0 a m •e4 c 0 10 •n O m 00 CO 01 CO G L u 0) 0 >. L L O C •n m .C 4+ > •w .0 V• u >. U C. 0 V 0 0 0 0 C 0 W. m m L ••• ,C .+ 0 O .V I F 4) •••1 {0 4) E0 •C. 'u0 u .-) C O •n U a O U >. .C 'p L U L 0n 0 •n > E M c m k 0 c CO 0 0 u t0 M 'p u c 0. m O 0) '7 pp L A •.. 0 • O O O O t ❑ t0 L L yy ❑ O •n q m - 4. ••+ 7 0 0 •0) ..w• m M N •j,. +. E .❑ +• G 0 .+ U O L 16 .C b L �g N N m .r• •H Of N 100 ® •n .. •n at n. •n u .+ 400'0 0 >I. O m q m pN 0 0 0 N F M u 0 0 L m > m 4. N •n c M 10 w ro - 0 0) U G. �� U U mL i 0 •.. U1 0 .+ u 0 0 0 L 0 4• N 3 •.. •M •M >. () ...1 N g 4 u m u .G .c 0 .0 O m 4) C 7 .••4 m C C .C L U 0) m m u 0 0 0 +• N 7 t0 U >• 7 •n O C •n 0 .n ++ W O. m V Cr. N ••• u O >. .+ co .. O F M@ g ..) 44 m O 4 � N N ''C 4. C ++ >. 07 4n• F. 0 •. M. E m 'C 0 IN M u 4. h 'p L 0 0 L .•. Wort +. C u L a u al E O W U L ... ,C 0 •M u C .-1 40 044 U U pp 0 O 0 C ... •.. m 0 m u l00 U I O Q m U4 a •n mMNOL L 0O .c3O �• ++ \ L M 8 0C 4. 0aa .• - ON 0 F t0 .c 7 m U .+ ... .+ 7 u N 'O N o .,-• 1. 4) • O .C V •n 6 u e , .Y. � M .0 O c 0 E C C CO •O O 0 ,C >. u .-I 0 ++ C 0Y >. I N C 'p O N „O .CCC S 0 4 m o m 4. ,c .+ F C r1 "0 ... N m 0 1)0 F .-. I••. >.9 0 .•+ ❑ U •n0 0 a +, N M 0 .+ •n 0 .. .n CU m .n 6 m m r I F ••.• Cp L m m N U O M .• •.. M O a CM L V •2 m L N 0Y m •n O1 Q• U 44 m u u 0 '01 W m cap O .+ m p •.a 0 'T) 0 m N ILO O 6 .C U 1 I K C >.,o •• • ❑ 400 G L l0 0 0 • V F. +I 4+ M M •p 0 p, m m m 0 ++ m r- 7 0 4-• O N N 0 m f0 0 a .C ••• U O a 0 .n 4. C 0) •n qq 44 O ••✓:7E • 0) 0 E J .0 r C .C •n L ••.l . N .CO m u ,0 ++ 0 u Gq m . t Ca L T. L CC - u U O C ‘. +• X O m 4. O 0 O L m ... U L L u •.. 0 B O go C) .n b 7 Q) ••• •n U... O O .❑ 0.•n G U L Pp ?v .c N 7 i U L •n O •C U .� 'p > S m r. u 0 u V •n CO D. L .-. b O •p •n O ... N M .a •n I 0i L L G '0 N 0 0 400 0 0 a > •C o •-• 0004.) 0g0 '44. w 000000000 00 .-, 01. 4.00000 X C L C m 3 'p Z L � C m V) L M M •p M .n 65 .C U C L 400 40. 0 a I3 .. m8 v) d t > C >4) 0 O OU V) m u IQ C 0)0 M E W L N m w 400 C C u V M 7 O \ N p®p t0 44 D7 03 ..p4 V U �40 0 g pG N •. S • y > 4g+ F O: a L RESOLUTION RE: APPROVE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AGREEMENT WITH NATIONAL HOG FARMS, INC. , AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board has been presented witn a Road Improvements Agreement with National Hog Farms, Inc. , and WHEREAS, said Agreement concerns Weld County Road 69 and Weld County Road 380, from State Highway 34 to the bridge crossing, and WHEREAS, the terms are as stated in said Agreement, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and WHEREAS, after study and review, the Board deems it advisable to approve said Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the Road Improvements Agreement with National Hog Farms, Inc. , concerning the hereinabove described roads, be, and hereby is, approved. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that t'-'e Chairman be, and hereby is, authorized to sign said Agreement. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 29th day of August, A.D. , 1990. Lead.? BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: WEL OUN�iT1Y, COLORADO �� Weld County Clerk to the Board #121, ��.� / �/� Gene R. Bra ner, Chairman BY:Q?0�p0 /�, / / 1dgi ✓ Ge ge Kennedy,P o-Tem Deputylerk to the Board dicti �� APPROVED AS TO FORM: onstan��ce L. Harbert • C.W. irby 4./ County Attorney EXCUSED DATE OF SIGNING - AYE Gordon E. Lacy 900786 AGREEMENT FOR ROAD IMPROVEMENTS THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 15O1_ day of August 1990, by and between Weld County, Colorado, by and through the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado 80631 (hereinafter referred to as "County") , and National Hog Farms, Inc. , 25000 Weld County Road 69, Kersey, Colorado 80644 (hereinafter referred to as "Hog Farm") . WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Hog Farm desires to have Weld County Roads 69 and 380, from State Highway 34 to the bridge crossing the South Platte River, paved with asphalt, and WHEREAS, the roadways as they stand presently are gravel, and WHEREAS, County deems it desirable to pave these roadways: however, it does not intend to use County funds in order to do so, and WHEREAS, in order to complete the paving, Hog Farm intends to pay the cost of the paving project as outlined below. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. County will pave Weld County Roads 69 and 380, from State Highway 34 to the bridge crossing the South Platte River. Paving will start in September, 1990, and will be completed in the Spring or Summer of 1991, weather and time restrictions permitting. County shall use County road crews to complete said paving. 2. Hog Farm shall pay the cost of said paving work as follows: A. From State Highway 34 to the railroad track is 8,769 linear feet. Hog Farm will pay for the paving on this section of WCR's 69 and 380. Weld County will pay for the preparation of the grade for paving. The cost of the paving only will be as follows: 8.769 feet by 24 feet by 24 feet by 4 inches = 5,280 tons of asphalt. 5,280 tons asphalt at $22.00 per ton = $116,160.00. Total to be paid by Hog Farm for paving to occur on WCR's 69 and 380, from State Highway 34 to the railroad tracks, will be $116,160.00. Page 1 of 2 Pages 90O783 B. For the section of the roadways north from the railroad tracks, between the tracks and the bridge crossing the South Platte River, the cost will be as follows: Gravel: 1,674 feet by 32 feet v 1,047 tons. 1,047 tons at $6.38 per ton = $6,680.00. Asphalt: 1,674 feet by 24 feet times 4 inches 1,008 tons. 1 ,008 tons at $22.00 per ton v $22,176.00. The total cost to be paid by Hog Farm for this portion will be $28,856.00. C. The total cost to Hog Farm for the entire project will be $145,016.00. 3. The cost to be paid by Hog Farm will be paid after the completion of the project and within thirty (30) days of invoice by County. SIGNED this 45th day of August _, 1990. ft � � WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, BY AND ATTEST ` vVvvi Wn THROUGH THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISS ONERS OF WELD COUNTY Weld County Clerk to the Board By: _1314,1 d Gene R. Bra tner, C airman De uty Clerk to the Board J NATIONAL HOG FARMS, INC. By: Bi 1 O' re, General Manager SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this 15th day of August , 1990. WITNESS my hand and official seal. ginidet Notary lit3055 WCR 69 Kersey, CO 80644 My commission expires: October 15, 1990 Page 2 of 2 Pages 90786 \% NATIONAL HOG FARMS, INC. 25000 WELD COUNTY ROAD 69• KERSEY,COLORADO 80804•3034519060 August 16, 1990 D � ' G ?0 1990 l,6 Weld County Attorney's Office !jwEL.D COUNTY P. O. Box 1948 ATTORNEY'S OFFICE Greeley, CO 80632 To Whom It May Concern: Enclosed please find the agreement for road improvements for WCR 69 and WCR 380. It has been signed and notarized. If you have any further questions or comments, feel free to call me. Sincerely yours, Si�✓�thell÷Cefr Deborah Ann Vannest Office Manager DAV/db enclosure e(.0735 RESOLUTION RE: APPROVE COMMUNICATION RADIO ANTENNA AGREEMENT AND DISCLAIMER OF OWNERSHIP - KGWN-TV TELEVISION STATION WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority o£ administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board has been presented with a Communication Radio Antenna Agreement for the installation, by Weld County, of a communication radio antenna tower on a television tower owned by Stauffer Communications, Inc. , KGWN-TV Television Station, and WHEREAS, said to-7er is located in the N} of Section 11, Township 10 North, Range 60 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, a Disclaimer of Ownership was also submitted by Stauffer Communications, Inc. , concerning a certain building which is located on the hereinabove described property, and WHEREAS, after study and review, the Board deems it advisable to approve said Agreement and Disclaimer of Ownership. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the Communication Radio Antenna Agreement with Stauffer Communications, Inc. , KGWN-TV Television Station concerning the property as hereinabove described be, and hereby is, approved. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that the Disclaimer of Ownership submitted b1 Stauffer Communications Inc. , concerning the building located on said property be, and hereby is, accepted. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that the Chairman be, and hereby is, authorized to sign the necessary documents pertaining to this matter. 900787 }rlCL'sCL: c'e . CM ) HALO ') Page 2 RE: COMMUNICATION AGREEMENT The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 29th flay of August, A.D. , 1990. ATTEST: MaiABOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WEL LINTY, COLORADO Weld County C erk to the Board i ep��/�J� f�y�Jj��7�k, ne . BrantxldY, GAalrman BY:&l a HLI g. � e � tifielA age K nne y�ro- C./ - Deputy caerk to the Board �Ll��-" APPROVED AS TO FORM: C nstance L. H rber C.W�"Kirbye� County Attorn ?:::—. EXCUSED DATE OF SIGNING - AYE _ Gordon E. Lacy 900787 X , . A' DISCLAIMER OF OWNERSHIP 5 COMES NOW STAUFFER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. , by anc through its Vice President, Gerald N. Holley/ and hereby disclaims . ownership in a building, being constructed of wood and tin siding/ and being approximately ten feet (10' ) by eight feet (8' ) in size, located on the following described property: (A 1 A 4-acre tract of land approximately 418 feet ✓ by 418 feet located in the North Half (N'1) of Section Eleven ( 11) , Township Ten (10) North, , Range Sixty (60) west of the Sixth (6th) P.M. , the Northern Boundary line of said Section Eleven (11) and the center o£ the tract exist- ing County Road along the East side of said Section Eleven (11 ) . Stauffer Communications, Inc. / disclaims ownership in the building only, and retains all ownership and title to the real property upon which the building is situated. STAUFFER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. ,'dtke M. Gerald N. Holley, V.P.,lit( ring a SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this /� - day of l7 4 , 1990. WITNESS my hand d official seal. k Donna Y,$LID N 0 S 00 0 Kµ, v ft' MRS 1O-7-nnt--1 G1 ��// L' JM+A��• i/Li!/-rte`-V Notary Public C . OC,0181 COMMUNICATION RADIO ANTENNA AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made by and between KGWN-Tv Television Station, a division of STAUFFER COMMUNICATIONS, INC_ , a DELAWARE Corporation, herinafter referred to as • "Lessor" or "Company" and WELD COUNTY, COLORADO a COLORADO corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Lessee" WITNESSETH: • Lessee wishes to install a communication radio anntenna on the television tower of the Company, and the Company is willing to grant such right, as provided herein. Therefore, in considertion of the rents and mutual covenants herein contained and the rights and obligations of the parties, one to the other, herein provided, it is hereby mutually covenanted and agreed as follows: i 1. Effective the first day of the month that installation is started, the Company agrees to permit Lessee to install a . communication radio antenna on the Company' s television tower located at SEE "A" ATTACHED DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY subject to the following conditions_ a. The antennas will be installed no higher than * feet above ground level, the precise location to be*determined by the Company's designated engineer. b. All wiring and installation of the antenna shall be by means of clamping or strapping, and in no event shall any tower members be drilled or punched or otherwise mutilated- c- In no event shall transmitter power exceed 500 watts. The installation and operation of the transmitter and antenna shall be such that there will at no time be any interference caused to the KGWN operation; and a determination by the Company that the transmitter or antenna are causing any such interference shall be final, and Lessee agrees immediately to stop use of the transmitter and antenna if demanded in writing by the Company on the ground of interference, and Lessee's charges hereunder shall be abated accordingly i d. Equipment required for the operation of the antenna shall be installed in space assigned therefore by the Company. This equipment shall be remotely controlled_ e. All installation work shall be done in a good, workmanlike manner, satisfactory in every respect whatsoever to the Company. f. Lessee shall do the installing and operating of the transmitter and antenna equipment entirely at its own cost and on its own responsibility and shall obtain and keep in force insurance, in limits prescribed by the Company at the date hereof, protecting the Company from all claims or damages of any kind arising in any way out of the install— ation or operation of the equipment hereunder, and shall furnish the Company with certificates of such insurance. CC0737 g. Lessee agrees to obtain and keep in force such licenses or franchises as its operations hereunder may require, to comply with all laws and regulations pertaining thereto, and to pay any and all taxes incurred or levied against its equipment or its operation. h. Lessee will pay to the Company for the rights herein granted by the Company the sum of $100.00 PER MONTH OR $1 , 200.00 ANNUAL per year for the height used and measured from center point of antenna to the base of the tower, effective the month during which construction begins. Initial term of the Agreement will be from the installation date SEPTEMBER 1 , 1990 . Rental will be paid on or before THE 10TH of each succeeding month as long as the Agreement remains in effect. 2. The Company agrees: * a. To make the necessary facilites and premises avail— able to Lessee at all times reasonably required for installation, operation and maintenance of the equip— ment herein covered. b. To furnish electric power necessary for the operation of the Lessee's equipment- c. Lessee shall have the right to enter or leave the site at all reasonable times provided that the u' company's Technical Director is notified in advance in writing of such entry for any reason other than normal maintenance and repair of equipment- 3. It is understood and agreed that in the event the laws or regulations governing the Company's operation are changed so as to require termination of the communication operations herein contemplated by Lessee, the Lessee immediately shall stop use of the transmitter and antenna if required by the Company because of such change, and Lessee's charges hereunder shall be abated accordingly. Notice of such change and the demand to cease operations shall be in writing. 4. It is further understood and agreed that for any period during which strikes or other labor activities, or power-failure, or any events beyond the control of the Company, interfere with the Company's performing under this agreement, the responsibilities of the Company hereunder shall be suspended, and the Lessee' s charges hereunder shall be abated accordingly. 5. In the event the Lessee 's operation is interrupted pursuant to paragraphs one (1 ) c. , three (3) or four (4) of this agreement, either the Lessee or the Company shall have the right to terminate this agreement by giving the other party fifteen (15) days' notice of termination in writing. 6. It is understood that any personal or property injury sustained by any person or thing by reason of the erection and maintenance of the Lessee' s radio equipment at this location, or removal thereof, will be the responsibility of the Lessee. *Does not pertain to Lesser. Lesser has their own building on Lessors property. oC0787 . • • 7. This Agreement shall be effective for one (1) year, unless sooner terminated as provided in paragraph five ' (5) above, and shall automatically renew itself from year to year thereafter, unless either party shall give the other written notice of desire to terminate or change any provisions not less than ninety (90) days prior to its anniversary date. Upon expiration or termination, Lessee agrees to remove all wiring and equipment from the tower and premises of the Company within ninety (90) days after date of termination or within fifteen ( 15) days after construction permit is granted by the FCC, in such manner as not to interfere with the Company' s operations, leaving same in as good a condition as when Lessee entered thereon. rb Done at this /1" - day of t. .r. , 1970 ' I LzeL see `� y %n Company Lessor) l�' / By 1 1•490A N 2O0787 Sf ��■�/�■ r■Ill ll/1 IWIE ■ II 2923 E.LINCOLNWAY CHEYENPIE.WYOMING 82001 307/634.7755 CARL J.OCCHIRNTI GCNEMnI MANAGCR Jully 23, 1990 Mr Vern Hammers/ Director Weld County Regional communications P. 0. Box 758 Greeley, CO 80632 Dear Mr. Hammers: Enclosed you will find (2) two copies of both the "Disclaimer of Ownership" and also the new "agreement" effective September 1, 1990. If you will please sign and return one of each to me and retain one of each for your files, you can get started on your project since you wanted this done by September 1, 1990. If you should have any questons, please call me. Sincerely, Carl J. Occhipinti enclosure CJO/jt SC 0737 THE GREAT WESTERN NETWORK BROADCAST SERVICES OF STAUFFER COMMUNICATION3.RYC. KGWN TV KSTE TV 10 KMTV3 KGWC TV 14 KGWL NS KGWR TV 13 CHEYENNE SCOTTSBWMGEFING STERLING CASPER LANDER/RIVERTON ROCK SPRINGS WYOMING NEBRASKA NWRA00 WNOMPIG WYOMING WIOMING surassILit■ �IIIO ma nn; r 2923 E.UNCOLNWAY CHEYENNE,WYOMING 82001 307/6347755 Aug'e, t CARL J.000HIPINTI GENERALIMNAGER rG/Y - July 16, 1990 Mr. Vern Hammers, Director Weld County Regional Communications P. O. Box 758 Greeley, CO 80632 Dear Mr. Hammers, I am in the process of having the "Disclaimer of Ownership" signed by our Vice President, Gerald N. Ho11ey. Also I am having an up to date contract drawn up on the lease of property and tower space. Due to the increases in insurance, taxes and tower maintenance which have escalated and since the last increase was over eight years ago. We have estimated that we will have to increase your rent to $100.00 per month or 51,200.00 annually. Sincerely, laic 1C�1GfTi� Carl . Occhipinti General Manager CJO/jt cc Gerald N. Holley, Vice Pres. , Stauffer Communications Tony Schaefer, Director of Engineering SC 078'1 THE GREAT WESTERN NETWORK BROADCAST SERVICES OF STAUFFER COMMUNICATIONS, KOWN TVS KSTFIV 10 KTVS IV KONG TV 14 ?COWL TV 3 MYR TV 13 CHEYENNE SCOTTSDUIFVGERING STFRL C CASPER LANDCR/RMMON ROCK mamas %Noma NOWASKA COLORADO WYOMING WYOHYNO %MMING •rIIIMAN AM aowe AW RV / r 2923 E.UNCOLNWAY CHEYENNE.%wombs° 82001 307/6347755 CARL J.OCCNIPINTI GCNEMLMANAGER August 17, 1990 Mr. Vern Hammers, Director weld County Regional Communications P. O. Sox 758 Greeley, CO 80632 Dear Mr. Hammers, There is no problem with the changes you made or would like added to our antenna agreement- We have added paragraph 8 and 9 as per your request, plus made the correction "does not pertain to Lessee"_ Sincerely, fareei-Cfrettd--1 Carl Occhipinti General Manager enclosure CJO/jt • pC 6787 THE GREAT WESTERN NETWORK BROADCAST SERVICES OP STAUFFER COMMUNICATIONS.INC. KGWN TV MYR TV 10 KTVS IV KGWC TV 14 KGWL 7V MYR T,13 CHEYENNE SCOTYSBUJFP/GERING STERLING CASPER LANDER/RIVERTON ROCK SPRINGS WYOMING NEBRASKA COLORADO WYOMING WYOMING WYOMING DISCLAIMER OF OWNERSHIP 5 COMES NOW STAUFFER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. , by and through its Vice President, Gerald N. Holley, and hereby disclaims ownership in a building, being constructed of wood and tin siding , and being approximately ten feet (10' ) by eight feet (8' ) in size, located on the following described property: (A) A 4-acre tract o£ land approximately 418 feet l by 418 feet located in the North Half (Nh) of Section Eleven (11) , Township Ten (10) North/ Range Sixty (60) West of the Sixth (6th) P.M. / the Northern Boundary line of said Section Eleven (11) and the center of the tract exist- ing County Road along the East side of said Section Eleven ( 11) . Stauffer Communications, Inc- , disclaims ownership in the building only, and retains all ownership and title to the real property upon which the building is situated. STAUFFER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. .1�� 4. Gerald N. Holley, V.P.,, Br�ng ' DESCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this - day of / 1990. • WITNESS my hand d official seal. k a M� Donn pnog z- noL Notary Public �E 0787 COMMUNICATION RADIO ANTENNA AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made by and between KGWN-TV Television Station, a division of STAUFFER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. a DELAWARE Corporation, herinafter referred to as "Lessor" or "Company" and WELD COUNTY., COLORADO a COLORADO corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Lessee" WITNESSETH: Lessee wishes to install a communication radio anntenna on the television tower of the Company, and the Company is willing to grant such right, as provided herein. Therefore, in considertion of the rents and mutual covenants herein contained and the rights and obligations of the parties, one to the other, herein provided, it is hereby mutually covenanted and agreed as follows: 1. Effective the first day of the month that installation is started, the Company agrees to permit Lessee to install a communication radio antenna on the Company's television tower located at SEA "A" ATTACHED DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY subject to the following conditions: a. The antennas will be installed no higher than + feet above ground level, the precise location to be"determined by the Company's designated engineer. b. All wiring and installation of the antenna shall be by means of clamping or strapping, and in no event shall any tower members be drilled or punched or otherwise mutilated. c. In no event shall transmitter power exceed 500 watts. The installation and operation of the transmitter and antenna shall be such that there will at no time be any interference caused to the KGWN operation; and a determination by the Company that the transmitter or antenna are causing any such interference shall be final, and Lessee agrees immediately to stop use of the transmitter and antenna if demanded in writing by the Company on the ground of interference, and Lessee's charges hereunder shall be abated accordingly. d. Equipment required for the operation of the antenna shall be installed in space assigned therefore by the Company. This equipment shall be remotely controlled. e. All installation work shall be done in a good, workmanlike manner, satisfactory in every respect • whatsoever to the Company. f. Lessee shall do the installing and operating of the transmitter and antenna equipment entirely at its own cost and on its own reaponcibility and shall obtain and keep in force insurance, in limits prescribed by the Company at the date hereof, protecting the Company from all claims or damages of any kind arising in any way out of the install- ation or operation of the equipment hereunder, and shall furnish the Company with certificates of such insurance. .9C0787 g. Lessee agrees to obtain and keep in force such licenses or franchises as its operations hereunder may require, to comply with all laws and regulations pertaining thereto, and to pay any and all taxes incurred or levied against its equipment or its operation. h. Lessee will pay to the Company for the rights herein granted by the Company the sum . of S100.0Q PER MONTH OE U X200.00 ANNUAL per year for the height used and measured from center point of antenna to the base of the tower, effective the month during which construction begins. Initial term of the Agreement will be from the installation date " SEPTEMBER 1, 1990 . Rental will be paid on or before THE 10TH of each succeeding month as long as the Agreement remains in effect. 2. The Company agrees: * a- To make the necessary-facilites and premises avail- able to Lessee at all times reasonably required for installation, operation and maintenance of the equip- ment herein covered. b- To furnish electric power necessary for the operation of the Lessee's equipment. ' * c. Lessee shall have the right to enter or leave the site at all reasonable times provided that the company's Technical Director is notified in advance in writing of such entry for any reason other than normal maintenance and repair of equipment. 3. It is understood and agreed that in the event the laws or regulations governing the company's operation are changed so as to require termination of the communication operations herein contemplated by Lessee, the Lessee immediately shall stop use of the transmitter and antenna if required by the Company because of such change, and Lessee's charges hereunder shall be abated accordingly- Notice of such change and the demand to cease operations shall be in writing. 4. It is further understood and agreed that for any period during which strikes or other labor activities, or power-failure, or any events beyond the control of the Company, interfere with the Company's performing under this agreement, the responsibilities of the Company hereunder shall be suspended, and the Lessee's charges hereunder shall be abated accordingly. 5. In the event the Lessee's operation is interrupted pursuant to paragraphs one (1 ) c. , three (3) or four (4) of this agreement, either the Lessee or the Company shall have the right to terminate this agreement by giving the other party fifteen (15) days' notice of termination in writing. 6. It is understood that any personal or property injury sustained by any person or thing by reason of the erection and maintenance of the Lessee's radio equipment at this location, or removal thereof, will be the responsibility of the Lessee. *Does not pertain to Lessee. Lessee has their own building on Lessor's property- �C C787 7. This Agreement shall be effective for one (1) year, unless sooner terminated as provided in paragraph five (5) above, and shall automatically renew itself from year to year thereafter, unless either party shall give the other written notice of desire to terminate or change any provisions not less than ninety (90) days prior to its anniversary date. Upon expiration or termination, Lessee agrees to remove all wiring and equipment from the tower and premises of the Company within ninety (90) days after date of termination or within fifteen (15) days after construction permit is granted by the FCC, in such manner as not to interfere with the Company's operations, leaving same in as good a condition as when Lessee entered thereon. 8. No portion of this Agreement shall be deemed to constitute a waiver of any immunities the parties or their officers or employees may posses nor shall any portion of this Agreement be deemed to have created a duty of care with respect to any persons not a party to this Agreement. 9. No portion of this Agreement shall be deemed to create an obligation on the part of lessee to expand funds not otherwise appropriated in each succeeding year. Done at this /7 day of �.��; , 19 9G . c-�-67-7444-t/ ez,w4i�tJ Lf4tG/ LlleeCompany+ � (Lessor) 1a �✓ vv �y W -Plt_r v : �at I uqi 8 BY lP/1��/% fJ/['{' L>GG!/ 9C0787 RESOLUTION RE: ACTION OF THE BOARD CONCERNING DEMOLITION OF DANGEROUS BUILDING - MEDFORD WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority o£ administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Department of Planning Services informed the Board that a building considered to be dangerous to persons under the Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings is on property described as Lot 5 and the Ni of Lot 6, Block 4, Valley View Subdivision, located at 3715 McAvoy, sr.id property being owned by Carol Medford, and WHEREAS, after hearing the testimony presented at the meeting of August 29, 1990, the Board deems it advisable to grant the owner an extension of time, until November 28, 1990, to complete the demolition and clean up of said building, and WHEREAS, if said work is not completed by November 28, 1990, the Board will authorize the demolition and clean up on said property by a private contractor; authorize the Purchasing Department to seek bids for said work; and set a hearing date to consider recovering the cost of the work. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that Carol Medford be, and hereby is, granted an extension of time, until November 28, 1990, to complete the demolition and clean up of the dangerous building located on the hereinabove mentioned property. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that if Carol Medford has not completed said work by November 28, 1990, authorization will be given for said demolition and clean up to be done by a private contractor; the Purchasing Department will be authorized to seek bids for said contractor; and a hearing date will be set to consider recovering the cost associated with said work. 900784 71,OCtC, GG ; �1 ,Ct�r, l✓I�;oKa Page 2 RE: DEMOLITION OF DANGEROUS BUILDING - MEDFORD The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 29th day of August, A.D. , 1990. BO OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: ��/ WE OUNTY, COLORADO Weld Count/0y' tk" o" ard � �. • I , y n Gene R. Brantner, Chairman BY: YIkX Q{ Ij ��( 1�Jlj/t1 Ge g�yPro-Tar- AY Deputy C]*rk to the Board !/�/oJx APPROVED AS TO FORM: Constance Hakb� 1 44.1-fr C. . Kirby ounty Attorney EXCUSED DATE OF SIGNING - AYE Gordon E. Lacy 900784 CASZ: BCV-1471 DATE: August 29, 1990 NAME: Carol Medford ADDRESS: 3725 MCAvoy Evans, CO 80620 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 5 and the N} of Lot 6, Block 4, Valley View Subdivision, located at 3715 MCAvoy. CASE SUMMARY 5-30-90 Letter sent with citation o£ dangerous building under the Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings. Pire damaged dangerous building ordered to be demolished by August 20, 1990. Property owner waived appeal of order to demolish building by not responding within specified time period. 8-20-90 Property inspected. 8-21-90 Notice of hearing sent. 8-28-90 Property inspected. No change from August 20, 1990, inspection. The Department of Planning Services' staff recommends that the Board authorize the clean-up work to remove the debris located on the property and authorize the Purchasing Department to seek bids for the clean up and removal of debris by a private contractor. The staff would also recommend that the Board set November 28, 1990, as the hearing date to consider recovering the cost of the clean-up work by special assessment or as a personal obligation of the property owner. On November 28, 1990, the staff will present an itemized account of the expense incurred by weld County to complete the clean up of the property. act) , lo Pk) / •`r� 900784 • • e��•h �1FJ+Y �f •i%yfN�y �W T �/y�Y aJ .�/ ! rS��d �1! \ 0�': ,- J?;0I ...E1/4''''h2-��(k�.��, v � K` K d F'J��`d vex. ' i, ,.„7'.4:. ►y Sri. Y .er. A[[[[[['''''',777777-I Q r •t(P iO� �J.I 4,...:1•411",..;T: F •",, S• y YVY v r,.-'Y 's,.+tT}xt �A ,�. •I 14..E /� f� �... T�. I rte. ..‘ .H,b •'�'.yr„I D y §'.4 ,Nrb.Yt + !: 2.41„),:).' ,t,;_ uuwMS+m"4 } `+t '1/2.'n` y. 1�yy. LA V-1 •V y. /V /µl 4V/ Jr.'",e,J t$i Lys t+'.l. v. Metier . W l •,J) ' ♦ 5a....•”1.1r, YwM`��,, u..,hT.J'+�'�+.°f'Id,� J �<. d", P RESOLUTION RE: APPROVAL OF RENEWAL REQUEST FOR 3.28 BEER LICENSE ISSUED TO HIGHLANDLAKE, INC. - EXPIRES NOVEMBER 9 , 1991 WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners o£ Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs o£ Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, Highlandlake, Inc. , has presented to the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, an application for the renewal of a County Retail License for the sale of fermented malt beverages, containing not more than 3.28 of alcohol by weight, for consumption on and off the premises, and WHEREAS, pursuant to Weld County Ordinance No. 6, Section II. , C. , said applicant has paid the sum of $57.50 to the County of weld for the renewal of the existing license, and WHEREAS, said applicant has exhibited a State License for the sale of 3.28 fermented malt beverages for consumption on and off the premises, outside the corporate limits of any town or city in the County o£ Weld at the location described as follows: 17029 Weld County Road 5, Platteville, Colorado 80651 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, having examined said application and the other qualifications of the applicant, does hereby grant License Number 90-14 to said applicant to sell 3.28 fermented malt beverages for consumption on and off the premises, only at retail at said location and does hereby authorize and direct the issuance of said license by the Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners, attested to by the County Clerk and Recorder, of Weld County, Colorado, which license shall be in effect until November 9, 1991, providing that said place where the licensee is authorized to sell 3.28 fermented malt beverages shall be conducted in strict conformity to all of the laws of the State of Colorado and the rules and regulations relating thereto, heretofore passed by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, and any violations thereof shall be cause for revocation o£ the license. 900788 C ciG C 0 -.1 So ) Af i . Page 2 RE: BEER LICENSE - HIGHLANDLAKE, INC. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 22nd day of August, A.D. , 1990. n BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: Lilikeaah WE �OUNTYY, COLORADO weld County Clerkto the Board J K aArt Gene R. Brantner, Chairman BY:s9k k . h d iQ d George Kennedy, Pro-Tem Deputy er to t e Boar EXCUSED APPROVED AS TO FORM: Constance L. Harbert �^ C_1(7 by County Attorney EXCUSED DATE OF SIGNING - AYE S Gordon E. Lacy 900788 DR 8400(WM) CM.Dept of Revenue Liquor or3.2 Beer License Liquor Enforcement DMslon 137$Sherman Street - License Number: license Type. 88 8424 Colorado 80261 � Renewal Application 1 4—,�,�� -Liability Information: • 03 ZCO 59•,1 3 1 : 10,71.7 1 1-n L:.'._'L:,".. I N C Business Location: 7Th PLATTEV?LL`_ C.': L..v:yM C :405'..,1—5';;•73 Current License Expires: • `a;JoV •0 9.2 9SCr lcl;r i f/COUNTY OOPM YOUR PROMPT ATTENTION ISREQUIRED.FAILURE TO COMPLETE THIS FORM ACCURATELY • SIGN THE FORM AND PROMPTLY MAY RESULT/N YOUR LICENSE NOT BEING RENEWED. • ENCLOSETOTAL AMOUNT ME • FILL OUT THIS FORM COMPLETELY AND CHECK APPROPRIATE BOX BELOW. • SUBLET FORM TO LOCAL(CD'WCAUNTY) �C This renewal reflects no changes from last application. LNEHSINO AUTHORITY MR APPROVAL There are changes from last application.(Report changes on form DR 8176-'Report of • CHECK MTH LOCAL AUTNORRY FOR AMOUNT Changes-Liquor and 3.2 Beer Licenses'and attach that form to this renewal application.) OF LOCAL FEES. I declare under penally of perjury in the second degree that this application Wall aftae hments are trla coned end complete/0 the best of my k oreedge. Authorized Signature: i ;,-;• t,.S-.Y Dare: Business Prole: �7 r1 The of Signer Of corporation) Sake Tax No. ATTACHED OR BOUT MUST Be COMPLETED(ALL 3 Cons) • SUBMIT THE STATE COPY AND LOCAL(CITY/COUNTY)AUTHORITY COPY TO YOUR LOCAL(CITY/COUNTY)LICENaINO AUTHORITY ' NO LATER THAN 45 DAYS BEFORE YOUR LICENSE EXPIRES. . EXCEPTION: Wholesaler,manufacturer.Importer,and public transportation system license renewals do not need Local Licensing Authority approval and must be retumed directly tO the Colorado Department of Revenue no later than 30 days priory license expiration. t REPORT AND APPROVALOF LOCAL LICENSING AUTHORITY ' The foregoing application has been examined and the premises,business conducted and character of the applicant are satisfac- tory,and we do hereby report that such license,if granted,will comply with the provisions of Title 12,Articles 48 and 47,C.R.S. THEREFORE THIS APPLICATION IS APPROVED. Local Lloensing Authority for: COCSTY. COLORADO ❑ TOWN/CITY 7 COUNTY 51gnaturs: / .% , , =;�'• T°' CS:tir_icn, Board o: 4/4/I , Date • i • f rJ�s+ ' `rl �.a/ August 22, 1990 a/j Acm•Cio Horan*.Do NOT*mos•Do Ayr firma.-Qv war Gene..Do NOT DETACH•Do Nor oemcm• Do Par DEMO. sY•"YGGCAppAi'Gs` t"T'C"'eY"'+Ifi C"}"Ci'iV T,_'?'w'.�_..r ._..�_ �...- _---�.__.... __ _._._ -_ -�. _.. - ---- _-'... -,- - __' i'LAh-TE VILA_ Cr), - •. \' ..T C NAME: USE LICENSE NUMBER IABILITY INFORMATION ' RENEwED LICENSE b FOR ALL REFERENCE ECI NTY CITY MUST. TYPE La DATE EXPIRES AMR' '.O_ ^t�vHlA;cL:LAx.c : `:C 14- 1:324 G3 2Co ':'(4:•. 3 114V'17 : 1-09- )I u. ••• N TYPE or LICENSE ISSUED CASH FUND STATE FEE cm,85%OAP CO 85%OAP m 8841 (a) a1-a (a) 40.9 (a) 324 (W 49.1 (a) .tip '. +1:i_ L1C sir_ ( ,i) 2`..00 a 25.Vv i 42.520' Make check payable to: TO r 2.5 d COl0eA00 DaeAeTMeNT TOTAL AMOUL�'�.(p' E+►.�r or RevaNue EXTENDED HOURS—Applbs only to Hotel and RestaurantBeer and Wine,al' h�quro�7 and Arts licenses,h desired,check yes-and enclose Total Amour Due PLUS 5170.00. Yea 7r,No 9C 0783 • ' , _, • - DR"MQM) Attachment. to Liquor/3.2 License Renewal Application This page must be completed and snicked to your signed renewal application form. Failure to include this pays with the application may result in your license not being renewed. Trade Name of Establishment I State License Number l4/ ryh / gnCl/ q (I tee r.—r-'1,)c: i 8I-20 1. Do you have legal posession of the premises for wflich this application for license is made? YESX NOG Are the premises owned or rented?CN -ryz2/ tf rented,effective and expiration date of!base: 2. (a) Has the applicant, or any of the partners,or officers, stockholders or directors of said applicant(if a corporation)ever been YES❑ NON Convicted of a crime?If answer is yes,'explain in detail and attach, (b)Have persons lending assistance or financial supportto the appicant,or manager,or employees,ever been convictedof atrial& YES NO$ If answer is yes;explain in detail and attach, 3. Has the applicant,or any of the partners,or officers, directors or stockholders of said applicant(if a corporation)or manager,ever: (a) been denied an alcoholic beverage license? YES NOi$ (b)had an alcoholic beverage license suspended or revoked? YES❑ rvo (c) had interest in any entity that had an alcoholic beverage license suspended or revoked? YES❑ NO If ani�ver is yes'to any o1 the above questions,explain in detail and attach. • 4, foes or did applicant,or any of the partners,or officers,directors or stockholders of said applicant(d a corporation),have a direst YES 71 NO/N 7-----thinthrect into tit in any other Colorado liquor iiotr,x{irto1udo tomatoes tram cry U,,._4,of it troct Ina hrNo try Oo enrol-. • - - It answer is yes;explain in detail and attach, - 5. Identify the persons,firms or corporations who now or will have atinVa.Wnterest,evidewdeither by a loan to,or equity ownership in,the business for which this license is requested.State the names and addresses and ilfieaMtartandSnekelif such financial interest(i.e.,bank.relatives,friends,previous owners,etc.),expressed in dollars or other.items of value,such as inventory,furniture or equipment Use separate sheet ti necessary. • Name �Address I IMerest i Type and Amount I S '6, List on a separate sheet the names and addresses of all liquor businesses in which any o1 the persons in question No.5 are materially iMdested, 7. Operating Manager `Address i Crate of Birth 8.If applicant is a partnership(except husband and wife), list all general partners.Use separate sheet if necessary, ' Name 'Address I Date of Birth I Name Address ;Date of Birth ..at ; 9, If the applicant is a eap0tabo�n,answer the folbwing: ' (a) Corporation is organized under the laws of the Statcof: ; c u/✓✓ ricl a Date Incorporated: l'—art- 915- ..., ..: .• . lb) Principal place of business is: H- r g h .i 9 r.?d. 1.ei I% ¢ (c) Date of filing last amuai corporate report to the Cob.Secretary of State: 5--/— 27 - (d) Name of each officer listed below: �....j etesden,t,,_ , • - , —„......_ . ., _ :. .. ., C A4 C"ss , �_ D 4pj g [� . , I � ) -r. ry-' as r-cnsch- I rle f . rtes � 1- i-t� I/H/1- : , r VicoPres. Home Address j Date of Birth I I I Treasurer Home Address Oate of Birth I • �—Gwr{ ricY 1"41 5, ,� WO -4P grch Or- 1-0,777;,-,,/ r-M - 3Sr • Secretary I Home Address Date of Birth • (e) List all stockhokders,5%or over,(if a public corporation)inducing actual owner or pledgee.(Use separate sheet if necessary) I Name Address C.0I Percent of Stock Date of Birth I rmiry E 5-eri5 i1 170 '2I ac, rid ;- n- grneui/A faa % -6 -if— i Name I Address I Percent of Stock Date of Birth I I I Name j Address I Percent of Stock I Date of Birth • (t) Name of all Directors%trustees of Corporation Name Address Date of Birth 7O wry If:: ?rrl5cri ! 7029 ,,t, !?.I.S- r.c4, rr-� �3(�9"�a i } —G - v .5Jl 1 Name I Address Date of Birth I `Gw /r-e h d -c 0.7 7EE'.1!P J ; 1 ,r,17 / e,,- 1 , 7,_, .30_rA y "ice/,. ��, .;,�`�.irf c,�JY , 1 ` ✓. DATE: AUGUST 22, 1990 SHERIFF' S OFFICE REPORT FOR BEER OR LIQUOR LICENSE RENEWAL REQUESTS APPLICANT: L. JENSEN, DBA HIGHLANDLAKE, INC. 515 KIMBARK STREET LONGMONT, CO 80501-5573 TYPE or LICENSE: 3.2% BEER SHERIFF'S REPORT: SHERIFF'S OFFICE NOTIFIED 8/21/90 AT 9:10 A.M. SHARON TOOK MESSAGE FOR LT. FLIETHMAN. HEALTH DEPARTMENT REPORT: 2C 0739 • • e P 556 982 532 • RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL No INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED - NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL r (See Reverse) r Colorado Dept. of Revenue Liquor Enforcement Div. 1375 Sherman Street Denver, CO 80261 Certified Fee Spatial Delivery Fee Restricted Delivery Fee Return Receipt Shpwing to whom and Dale Delivered ki Return Receipt shOwing to whom. m Date,and Address of Delivery a TOTAL Postage and Fees 5 Postmark or Date I a SENDER: Complete Items 1 and 2 when addRlpnatsarvlCse are desired, end complete Items 4 3 and 4. -.:- Put your address in the"RET0RN TO"Space on the reveres aide.failure to do this will prevent this card from being returned to WU:The room wing'fee Will orovi9e volt the myna pf the ratfit Iii_/Btl end. ppttop 991 l Mk For aaamonar fan IM following services ere available.Consult postmaster fees j check Cws(es)for addftionel servitors)requested. t t, El Show to whom delivered,date,and addressee's address. 2• C Restricted Delivery - Mora thane) - (Ewa charge) . 1 3. Article Addressed LO: . . . , .. ,—,. 4. -A�rotlCle Number Colorado Dept. of Revenue Liquor Enforcement Divisiao ape of Service: 1375 Sherman Street uRegistered J insured �n� utt ertlRed O CODm Rearpt Denver, CO 80261 C3Express fear O rwu Meechentltee Alwaywob sin -tun of e•dreeaee a 5. Signature —Addressee s �d• ` ONLY rj �/��.y -. X mitred and fee paid) SC 073 '5 . B. Signature —Agent Aut 2 81990 x 7. Date of Delivery REVENUE MAIL ,R,��On�On} Mn� PS Form 3811,Apt. 1989 atAad•►.o.isear3131ATF OCEGIGis#1C &PQ RECEIPT 90 -e4 4' I • i a.. .,. . t*. -t@ of Color . o o0 •°� f I De o . rt, eat Off Mawaaama f c j < Liquor Enforcement Divlsl0a t 1375 Sherman Street (t ! Denver. Colorado 80261 IPI < � HIGHLAN0LAKE INC ,� 17029 MELO CNTY R0 5 PLATTEYILLE CO 80651 r1 4 �.. i il, l Alcoholic Beverage License agile , I I Maui Me Carts C� YM�L Tie ILGller MIME OMR,ATYDMOR 1 14-27324 03 206 5941 3 111087 N0V 09: 1991 s 1 ' I Tw Nimmul OaapionatASS Re S (I J 3.2 PERCENT BEER RETAIL LICENSE $ 50.00 �I) i i COUNTY 85 PERCENT- OAP FEE $ 42.50 " TOTAL run S 92.50 Ot p This license is issued subject m the hews of the State of Colorado and ospaaally soda the d provisions of 15de 12, Articles 46 err 47. CRS 1973. as ameodod This license is non- , . C € aansferable and shall be conspicuously posted is the Dhtoa above GaTenbod Ibis license is only valid tdzou� the expiration duo shown above. Questions concerning this license I f 1 should be addressed to the Department of Revenue Liquor Enforcement Divisor, 1375 C � Shaman Street,Denver,CO 80261. �€ # C In testimony whereof,I have hereunto set my hand t I CtliS.� tpUG29Ma._ � 'Divisio " I OR 4402(340 s W tern` •a 1 CJ lT L ",W Z 900785 . � L `J ' 1411% r. �' ins v J r t 974;1:11;;(11114, n t x,'Y 1,74 I''Lr ' f. C ,J I .� ,.y, j y�r / +Nil "J ;Act. J. i ``' ( r I \ is r 1. 9,,4 fr r^ ny,t�� s r '��i /1i 7 �l r i �yy� J / ••� . ; t, N5).�'i/�f nt1. � �I�Q � . . .r .� „' CJrr � Uti r . ... 5rf . ir 't!�•f �fr n��.4 {lnl, � Z,� t . {�� fK {5 \�T 11 U; /, r �T,t l' BIr^�,'1 �1 u'r9r�,T 9 �'f✓'i14� 1x/h"f/r�1�,Tt1111d1 //�1��l tp �r,nl\� fY Jib.!' . 1 1' I r rA`l +, l I�`1 1 X11 e /� 1 ,,,,,�y�y.f ltrilik n�571 tI (i/ .n! {t I/`♦;, 1 t/�/N/ yyy ltt // ` wh ar\4y .4 r I.-•{IO f rfelftk' i6finArttt - f'I•`f,TF' ., P rsp\T�t _..r t�y .i, 'L r,�y4 #r'; ' I W ,tfe. A,n`t p °1t7q`. ri ors. `. ,,,4 0 n7a fryitip, f, ;" ¢ /'A.,40,‘r, t fri?�S .�� 0. 0, .rryv y R�1 / !t }� �r40lbedadi ASA4'4.�1°w, � r4r4s ,% Als'n Z''+ iktid+�t:.?`.4 .4i./w'*=a \�4.- 11,' wir \:".1i� -�ti 1/('D+- �r•�• 01 \�VI \�y tSt�, v�. pQ M a ? r•,.itet' !u 'tv.. •$5W�.'A t,y 4;;,::::::41,F 1 `Yt° '�xrx+`�t ► .• ��./,. f to ci c� �7 s r ri.»N"I0 1, ti S, /ti,:;,; r frJf/t wl" ~—f' ! �7 q, °,t at. ."."' f/^Vp' Z,"' . A J k ♦ ` ��1`.. .. 4fk q7, �� i D. Et 3:• aC ,�' "fl°, ' ;N. ,4`�4��'e • its ,i ▪o a 5•l/'%rltt ti � /t _fr ` y �Vy Fil '� l� /Y ` .. It�y`��it / 1!'�41y, ♦ 1,2; '' S M y^ O tl ? ap s"r„p', \Y .. w y/ 0, ``�`m 9s d to °� L ..rrs h (.42.9,'0, L4,„s FI 4 i r .in 0 r.O O }7 •? a' pie 12 p%�� jf/r �. // nm.1,49/4(..; �: ,. co 5 ..raw O 8 W amp a ,� �r}r/✓if /'�'t z m,Q.\\ 0,� �7•^l � C d z ►1 9 ,":1;,-2//).., 1 -t ` gg z , K a E A ,•• C x R 'I� ; +%>F*r R-7 p� f. .` 4 r .rO' art a* r J"i tl " 4 .L \`: a >1 ,Is tl 'OU OD L wr 3 y �, • �y ��i�tth r<1 O O .a aQ Gt O Y� `y1/2 l..yD gm Y.t / .ia.,,,�▪`�'- g i CD ' y C in a m o 03 , �� - �rJ 'Y`` en / r % i\ I s f \ ea to tl r. PI -b .Ey , ,,,,„,e,�. \,\+, __ 0 Q $ � r� O C C D o tp �, v E� _ .� fr , a.0 a a a U ` ,. • as 8 3 C ; � a O c c ' ., `"� 1r Cie '� m S u 4 ^ °�' s a, ate• ,.�'". `n F+y \Q t a. ml m �p y -ii.-„,:.2. cri\ ."'~4 ' i � i M W fJ y � O d b N Y*,Kqr +,42' ,.�� 4 0G w Op Cr / k"�` •• V C `� X ►a a H n. v ≥ � °J p .C i,�irr a Cr-4rr 4: .-v?, ? a W m�11r,...J, eV f o - �/ ^i w O u�▪ >� z +p' 2 (� �:��'"YYffP"��''�7 �, X11 4llr` � O i n .( C .., •0 b tl W ,.#. z �l� tf t e .�.i O p O O ,,, a. I.4i ,- -,, u 1/, �i Q7 4, \V ref. By /' .-1 4. � y,Q O L. q N O I§r: �.; lr tj///._G 1 //1��Jt p rya 'i":: Cl.) .� O. O= iv ► >{ 'O O a O c '.r, �� ¢. ]i,#'..- ui\,‘`I\c _4:04) : .. 44 ,,�` 1� i t a-t fit, S d yak o �y r �¢ x ':j1/, \ }��4�4 �\F1F .�t; _ [rTV/• -`.. � O 7. pip` 8 O a ^ � t am.. r►••- {� /4, +aw./lr/�I.. J! O .•l .-. v . ! J f 'tflrf its I'�• e, -.c� �. =ro O a 0 It � to .�— E �'�'7`^ �,, s ,,,`,,�` ''� ', 1 c. 1r�✓r/t W f � d r cy 4ya O ~ :Z •t 1i,,/t li l t�Qi E o , 2 p, �✓ y d c) C 7A s . « ,,,,,j,tit tf a�" ea o O o eA na 7j67,,,,:-.; ��+I .,.• ,. > nn to r� � • /` f !•� �,�I/i t 'y ! CS .di of � 7 .e. 0. r - �.l E r d�,�� Ia .`� �ni•,. �`;A\,* n �tP", "1 .,.. y � O m � �'. � a �a1�;<.`�+. 4 as N i ' l -'f, S rt�5?'r *Ili ^11 r I „ 9.O O.m C . 'L+k./ ! t� • {��ijj t , qyp. 7Wr•A - rp .. 9` t`!`'R`ri \,.lr/. lwp , , /►(�Yy at ,1 �yy ,�rr7p�a x pmr .r ,tred;c �.•N-- T VVLI d J eew u ej"'M •.11 ^P@7 t Jf�l'rM N )�//, �,-- ;�1147Obld �,� �p,, r Y '� / °� / '�" Hi. , M q ,\ vt e • e [vr\ /pfr n' !rr` \A'l ;aF.. I 'R� v,114,�' l�� d'`�,W, Or g141:x .�AIP 11!0.r �✓ �41.„4�n1' Cio,,,„,4 .,,,,t,p T"7,,��v1 !Yet ,,rq tlgyi!o r 0it 46,,. r ,4 a !.. ,Wi '6. „•„ • 4�,'i... ,u ,N.1., .Ini '14Rk' 10tII/f r/ e / , `tifr%B y,.Y y/ - ,d.t ,r' ,T'Vial n%,/ Nett 4Vr/ w ywYi' '�r,{,�4 t f / 4' ,,*�",�/p i(o'i to eisitif,�ifp/ ,.•.ly `V'r•' w ..l �•`��>�t y,,t.. 4 'k,, ;,.lta,tI� '"..w,l , f� �� 1 .,z/f/:'B - Kik:i.4,1/4-s.A- �4Y'r: , s, ,`�:li,4, r I9 it0..,1 4,1 ,,,,,m, tiyi? 41- /-,rh`:,tt•—iiii .r1 '..t..1. rrf�,'lLA. ii,1 444: 44: :......A: �q\y(,irm. f rot vie ,,$),s, ; :�,� r / .:. � A "er,! �1 P ', r ! � a ,lag �j�, l: /: p ., t 7.� � .1 ;11÷...,,; A4 , w r,;:aS, � � aW. a I A. 1Z Ys'r..k.�.�• r ly I ' ,. .. !, I It 4. s,,! P 556 982 001 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL NO IIISORANCL COVEPACE PROVIDED NOT FON INTERNATIONAL MAIL (See Reverse) w HIGHLANDLAKE, INC. 17029 WCR 5 PLATTEVILLE, CO 80651 4 Certir ed Fee Special Delivery Fee Resented Delivery Fee , RetuReturnROCeIPt ShOwIN 10 WWI)and Dale Delivered tn g Return Recepl shawl,"to wham, Date,and Address of Delivery m TOTAL Postage and Fees S - _ 1 Postmark or Date E 9/# 2 -t 4'14 1 + SENDER Complete items T end henadditional services�ed, and Coplete Hems 1 3 end 4 Put your address In the"RETURN T•0"Spatef^wl�l reverse erOVIr u t he meo do MIa willDrevetlt this cam from being retumed to your lee tmli p sea s the,date of_delivery,For adlitgn� tees L"^fd"o^�SWVMM are available. anau t_gos and c -ck bosies)for additional servicets>requested. 1 1. O Show To whom delivered,date,and addressee's address, 2. O Restricted Oelivery (Ewa charge) Otto charge) t 4. Article Number 3. Article Addressed to: &Q/ HIGHLANDLAKE, INC. Type of Service: r� stared U Insured 17029 WCR 5LeCertified O COD • Expos Mao ❑Rehm Receipt PLATTEVILLE, CO 80651 tor Merchandise • towns obtain signature ct addressee or agent and DATE OELIVERED. 8. Addressee's Address (ONLY(f • i 5: Signature —Adtlrees� requested bndJtepaid) .' B. 5 natu . X �E 0788 7. Dote o a Iva /yam PS Form 3811,Apr. 1989 *IMMRo.11164x+1a DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT ` . -- 1` RESOLUTION RE: AUTHORIZATION FOR THE WELD COUNTY ATTORNEY TO PROCEED WITH LEGAL ACTION AGAINST CERTAIN PARTIES FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE WELD COUNTY BUILDING CODE ORDINANCE AND THE WELD COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Weld County Department of Planning Services has referred certain violations of the Weld County Building Code Ordinance and the Weld County Zoning Ordinance to the County Attorney' s Office, and WHEREAS, those persons in violation of the Weld County Building Code Ordinance and the Weld County Zoning Ordinance are Sharyl L. McKinley; Lois Bowen; James and Betty Stewart; Carl Lyons; and Sterling and Bonnie Roberton, and WHEREAS, despite efforts by the Planning staff to resolve said matters, the violations have not been corrected, and WHEREAS, the Board deems it necessary to bring legal action against those individuals as hereinabove named to correct said violations_ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that Thomas O. David, Weld County Attorney, be, and hereby is, authorized to proceed with legal action against Sharyl L. McKinley; Lois Bowen; James and Betty Stewart; Carl Lyons; and Sterling and Bonnie Roberton to remedy the violations of the Weld County Building Code Ordinance and the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, and any other persons occupying the properties, any persons claiming an interest in the properties, and any persons acting in active concert with the identified parties. \ 900796 Page 2 RE: BUILDING CODE AND ZONING VIOLATIONS The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 5th day of September, A.D. , 1990. ATTEST: G% BO OF NTY COMZSMSZONERS WE CODIQTY,COU LORADO Weld County C erk to the Board Y/lfi t, l� �y Gene R. r ner, C airman 1 ! � t 1/fIA) Geo ge Kdnnedy, Pro? BY:\_c1.1uty Deputy(,Clerk to the Board 5Y�' APPROVED AS TO FORM: Constance L. Har ert A / ! C.W. Kerby / County Attorney, EXCUSED Gordon E. Lacy 900796 MEMORAnDUM To Hoard of County Commissioners on. Avgnst 27_ 1990 COLORADO From Department of Planning Services subject. Legal Action Authorization The Department of Planning Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners authorize the Weld County Attorney to proceed with legal action against the following parties for violations of the Weld County Building Code Ordinance. Building Code Ordinance Violations: BCV-1492 Sheryl L. McKinley 20649 Staghorn Court Johnstown, CO 80534 The Department of Planning also recommends that the County Attorney be authorized to proceed with legal action against any other persons occupying the properties, any persons claiming an interest in the properties, and any persons acting in active concert with the identified parties. Copies of the violation materials are available at the Department of Planning Services' office or the Weld County Attorney's office. 9007g6 $1 �( MEMORAn®UM To AnarA of County commissioners on. auger 28, 7990 COLORADO From Department of Planning Services Susisct: 3£g'alSti on Authorization The Department of Planning Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners authorize the Weld County Attorney to proceed with legal action against the following parties for violations of the weld County Building Code Ordinance. Building Code Ordinance Violations_ BCV-1493 Lois Bowen 15504 Mary Avenue Ft. Lupton, CO 80621 BCV-1494 BCV-1494 James & Betty Stewart Carl Lyons 7166 Darold Street 15296 Coleman Avenue Ft. Lupton, CO 80621 Ft. Lupton, CO 80621 The Department of Planning also recommends that the County Attorney be authorized to proceed with legal action against any other persons occupying the properties, any persons claiming an interest in the properties, and any persons acting in active concert with the identified parties. Copies of the violation materials are available at the Department of Planning Services' office or the Weld County Attorney's office. ec019a s „�4 MEMORAnDUM eTo SoarQ of County C4mmi,ssi.oners oat. August, 31. 1990 C O ARAID() ream Department of Planning Services lay's? . sabot,: Legal Action Authorization The Department of Planning Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners authorize the Weld County Attorney to proceed with legal action against the following parties for violations of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. Zoning Ordinance Violations: VI-1597 Sterling and Bonnie Roberton 85-175 Farrington Highway Wainanae, HI 96792 The Department of Planning also recommends that the County Attorney be authorized to proceed with legal action against any other persons occupying the properties, any persons claiming an interest in the properties, and any persons acting in active concert with the identified parties. Copies of the violation materials are available at the Department of Planning Services' office or the Weld County Attorney's office. 9C079; RESOLUTION RE: MODIFY LIST OF ARBITRATORS FOR PROPERTY ASSESSMENT APPEALS WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board did, by Resolution dated August 29, 1990, name Joseph Murphy, Craig Farr, and Ronald Lambden to serve as arbitrators for property assessment purposes, and WHEREAS, Ronald Lambden has advised the Board he will not be able to serve as an arbitrator at this time, but William E. Condon, Jr. , is willing to serve and has submitted his qualifications, and WHEREAS, the Board deems it advisable to modify the list of arbitrators to reflect that Ronald Lambden has been replaced by William E. Condon, Jr. , as an arbitrator. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the official list of qualified arbitrators for Weld County propety assessment appeals cases be, and hereby is, modified to place Joseph Murphy, Craig Farr, and William E. Condon, Jr. , on said list. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 5th day of September, A.D. , 1990. ATTEST= �elt BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WEL (COU�N/TY, COLO Weld County Clerk to the Board ein, 'Gene R. Brantner, Chairman �o BY: reaea qe ennedy, Pro-Teal Deputy erc to t e Boar APPROVE AS TO FORM: ons ance L. Harbert 47 Al— *At C.W. Kirby Crefrr e-.-a.4� ,County Attorney EXCUSED Gordon E. Lacy 900791 r .y'L,✓ L ill 1 0 , T ..!C � /!/ ��,., , ��^,-�.r �l N-1,1 c� RESOLUTION RE: RESCIND RESOLUTION OF JUNE 11, 1990, CONCERNING ELECTRONIC MONITORING SERVICES - BI MONITORING CORPORATION CORRECTINAL RESOURCES, INC. WHEREAS, the Board o£ County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, on June 11, 1990, the Board approved a Resolution concerning a Contract for electronic monitoring services with BI Monitoring Corporation Correctional Resources, Inc. , and WHEREAS, the Board has been advised that said Contract was never executed; therefore a new Contract will be presented to the Board, and WHEREAS, the Board deems it advisable to rescind said Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the Resolution of June 11, 1990, concerning electronic monitoring services entered into with BI Monitoring Corporation Correctional Resources, Inc. be, and hereby is, rescinded. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 5th day of September, A.D. , 1990. /kit BOAR OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: WE OUNTY, COLORADO Weld County Clerk to the Board /y!g9 /��iye & Gene R. Brantner, Chairman BY: \ d K `�/na&A) a ge Ronne y, Pro-T8m Deputy kg..erk to the Board APPROVED AS TO FORM: ons ance L. Har ert fe"---;;1-57-7 czedi County Attorney EXCUSED Gordon E. Lacy 900789 - � � � RESOLUTION RE: APPROVE CONTRACT FOR ELECTRONIC MONITORING SERVICES AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Weld County Jail is overcrowded due to an increase in the inmate population, and WHEREAS, the Board has been presented with a Contract for Electronic Monitoring Services with BI Monitoring Corporation Correctional Resources, Inc. , and WHEREAS, the terms and conditions are as stated in said Contract, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and WHEREAS, after study and review, the Board deems it advisable to approve said Contract. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the Contract for Electronic Monitoring Services with BI Monitoring Corporation Correctional Resources, Inc. , be, and hereby is, approved. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that the Chairman be, and hereby is, authorized to sign said Contract. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 5th day of September, A.D. , 1990. ATTEST: �GAe " BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 74:TY, COLORADO Weld County Clerk to the Boardh . . Gene R. Bran ner, C airman BY: Sletilit .0 DA) _ e ge ed , Pry ett Deputy lerk'T to the Board APPROVED AS TO FORM: Constance L. Har ert C.W. Kirby / / ,County Attorney EXCUSED Gordon E. Lacy 900790 SG Oc)c J cC . G G� 4� 76d ELECTRONIC MONITORING PROGRAM SERVICE AGREEMENT. THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 5th day of September 19 90 , by and between the Weld County Sheriff and the County—a-Weld, Colorado, by and through the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, hereinafter referred to as "County" or "Weld County" , and BI Monitoring Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "BI Monitoring." This Agreement outlines the responsibilities of each party relative to the operation of an Electronic Monitoring Program. WHEREAS, County is required to maintain a county jail at the County's expense for the detention, safekeeping and confinement of those persons lawfully committed pursuant to Section 17-26-101, C.R.S. , and WHEREAS, the Weld County Jail is overcrowded due to an increase in the inmate population in Weld County and the State of Colorado, and WHEREAS, the County is seeking cost-effective means by which • to ease the Jail crowding problem and to lower the costs of the inmate incarceration ::o the County, and WHEREAS, BI Monitoring operates an Electronic Monitoring Program by which selected sentenced inmates may be monitored at home or at a site off of the premises of the Weld County Jail at a cost less than that of maintaining the inmate in the Weld County Jail facilities, and WHEREAS, the County is authorized to provide a Home Detention Program such as that offered by BI Monitoring pursuant to and subject to the conditions of Section 17-26-128, C.R.S. , and WHEREAS, the County is authorized to enter into agreements for the benefit of the County pursuant to Article III, Section 3-8 of the Weld County Home Rule Charter, as amended, and Section 30-11-101, C.R.S. , as amended. NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the foregoing and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, BI Monitoring and County hereby agree to the following terms and conditions: S 1. Definition As used in this Agreement the term "participant" shall mean any person sentenced to or lawfully confined in the Weld County Jail who is determined by a Colorado Court to be eligible for Home Detention pursuant to Section 17-26-128 (1) Page 1 of 13 Pages 900790 and (1.1) , C.R.S. , and/or pursuant to any lawful municipal ordinance. 2. Equipment and Services Provided by BI Monitoring BI Monitoring agrees to provide to County the following products and services from the effective date of this Agreement: A. Equipment BI Monitoring shall provide all required field monitoring equipment and a proportionate share of its host computers. Specific equipment to be provided is THE HOME ESCORT SYSTEM, the CONTRAC Active/Passive System and the CONTRAC Voice Verification System acquired from BI Incorporated of Boulder, Colorado. The BI "Drive-Bi" units also will be made available. Other equipment/features may be provided subject to mutual agreement in writing. The HOME ESCORT SYSTEM is an active monitoring system consisting of a radio frequency transmitter, a Field Monitoring Device (FMD) , and a host computer system. Transmitters and FMDs are considered "field equipment" and are issued to Weld County and the program's participants. BI Monitoring represents that this product is the most secure and reliable system on the market. Tamper detection is multi-level and automatic. ,. The CONTRAC Active/Passive System offers the capability of combining active, radio frequency/continuous monitoring with passive, random voice verification. This product is a mid-range product in respect to security. Tamper detection is limited to visual inspection of the transmitter. The CONTRAC Voice Verification system is a passive monitoring system. This system uses standard telephone service to link the program's participants to a host computer system. The computer creates a participant- specific voice template used to verify a specific participant's presence or absence at a designated location. Random calls are made by the computer to the participant's residence or other location. Upon reaching the participant, he or she is instructed to repeat a selection of words which are compared to the template. If the comparison is valid, the system confirms the participant's presence. The host computer systems are located in BI Monitoring's offices in Boulder, Colorado. 900790 Page 2 of 13 Pages BI Monitoring shall supply a sufficient quantity of HOME ESCORT SYSTEM and CONTAC units and CONTRAC Voice Verification client slots to meet Weld County's need_ The County shall assist BI Monitoring in forecasting equipment needs to ensure BI Monitoring's order of sufficient equipment reasonably to meet the County's demand. BI Monitoring shall provide without cost to Weld County sufficient field equipment supplies (batteries, latches, and straps) for the required installations. Installation tools and instruments will be supplied to Weld County without cost (one Activator and two Tool Kits per 30 units) . Shipping of equipment and associated tools and supplies is the responsibility of BI Monitoring. BI Monitoring will bear all telephone service charges associated with the field equipment-computer communications. Weld County reserves the right to select from the available equipment its preferred system/s. BI Monitoring shall pass along to Weld County all available equipment warranties. BI MONITORING EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY WARRANTY THAT ITS MONITORING SERVICE OR ITS SYSTEM IS IMPERVIOUS TO TAMPERING. IN NO EVENT WILL BI MONITORING BE LIABLE FOR ANY INDIRECT, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES IN CONNECTION WITH OR ARISING OUT OF THE PROVIDING, PERFORMANCE OR USE OF PRODUCTS PROVIDED UNDER x THIS AGREEMENT OR ARISING OUT OF BI MONITORING'S FAILURE TO PERFORM ITS RESPONSIBILITIES HEREUNDER. BI MONITORING SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY FAILURE OR DELAY IN PERFORMANCE HEREUNDER WHICH IS DUE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, TO ANY CAUSE BEYOND ITS CONTROL. IN NO EVENT DOES BI MONITORING ASSUME ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR ACTS THAT MAY BE COMMITTED BY PERSONS SUBJECT TO OR USING PRODUCTS. B. Monitoring Services BI Monitoring will supply sufficient staff to maintain 24 hour, 7 day monitoring of cases referred by Weld County. 9CC790 Page 3 of 13 Pages BI Monitoring will handle data entry, data termination, data storage, and monitoring transmission data for all cases referred by weld County. Data entry consists of entering all required computer demographic, curfew, and system configuration data on each case. Additionally, BI Monitoring will maintain census information for statistical compilation. Upon a participant's completion of the monitoring term BI Monitoring will print a termination recor o£ all transmission data during the term of monitoring. This record will be maintained by BI Monitoring for a period of no less than five years from the date of each participant's termination. BI Monitoring will provide notification of offender violations to identified and cleared Weld County staff. Violation notification will take place on an immediate, next day, or next working day basis according to BI Monitoring policy and as requested by Weld County. Participant violation and equipment status information will be documented and maintained by BI Monitoring in a case file developed for each referral. BI Monitoring notification policy is: Immediate Notification - On a 24 hour, 7 day basis all curfew violations in excess of one-half hour will be reported to pre-identified Weld County staff immediately upon the completion of the one-half hour period. All first-time detected tampers shall be reported to pre-identified Weld County staff within one-half hour of occurrence. Next Day Notification - Curfew violations and tampers will be reported to pre-identified Weld County staff by 9 A.M. , the day following the violation. This notification applies to 7 days per week, including weekends and holidays. Next Working Day - Curfew violations and tampers will be reported by 9 A.M. , the next working day following the violation. Working days are determined by scheduled Weld County staff working days. Equipment status problems may be reported at any notification level desired by Weld County. All violation reporting intervals are determined by Weld County. Weld County may choose any level for any breakdown of its caseload and further may change a participant's notification level at will. Page 4 of 13 Pages are, BI Monitoring also will adjust its policy to meet reasonable notification intervals desired by Weld County. Violation information will be communicated by telephone. Hard Copy reports will be maintained on file at the BI Monitoring office. Such reports will be provided to Weld County upon request. Facsimile transmission also will be provided if requested. Weld County will have the capability of accessing the HOME ESCORT SYSTEM host computer for direct retrieval of data. Access is possible through using computer hardware, modem, dedicated telephone service, and communications software. BI Monitoring will train Weld County staff regarding accessing the host and using the HOME ESCORT SYSTEM management software. BI Monitoring will provide on-site training for Weld County staff prior to initiating the Monitoring Program. The initial training session shall be a minimum of one (1) day. The training shall be divided into classroom type and practical hands-on instruction. C. Agreement Coordinator In order to administer this Agreement effectively, BI Monitoring shall designate an Agreement Coordinator. Until further notice is received, BI Monitoring's Agreement Coordinator shall be in the individual named in Schedule A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Any change in BI Monitoring's Agreement Coordinator shall be effective upon ten (10) days advance written notice. 3. Services to be Provided by Weld County Weld County agrees to provide the following services from the effective date of this Agreement: A. Services Weld County shall retain complete authority for case selection and case management. Weld County is responsible for all liaison work with the involved courts. Weld County shall provide to BI Monitoring required case and curfew information. This required information includes essential demographic and ease information 'as well as the establishment of daily curfews. Page 5 of 13 Pages Orr • Weld County shall identify and make available Weld County staff for the purpose of BI Monitoring notification of offender violations and equipment status problems. Weld County shall perform participant orientation and installation of equipment in compliance with BI Monitoring policy. BI Monitoring policy establishes a specifically correct method of equipment installation. Participant orientation, relative to BI Monitoring policy, establishes equipment use guidelines. Equipment installation may be performed by BI Monitoring staff if the County chooses to exercise this option. Weld County will ensure that equipment assignment responsibility advisements are signed by the offenders. Weld County will establish violation notification parameters and violation response policy and shall respond to violations in accordance with that policy. B. County Agreement Coordinator In order to administer this Agreement effectively, the County shall designate a County Agreement Coordinator. Until further notice is received, the County's Agreement Coordinator shall be the individual named in Schedule A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Any change in the County Agreement Coordinator shall be effective upon ten (10) days advance written notice. 4. Cost o£ Services BI Monitoring will provide all products and services outlined in this Agreement at a daily cost based upon a per unit/per day basis. The field equipment units considered for billing are those in actual use (equipment assigned to an offender or data entered in the computer) . Additionally, field equipment units in Weld County inventory in excess of five working days by Weld County's request (requested spares) are considered billable units (though are billed at a reduced rate) . The intent of this billing plan is to bill Weld County only for those units in actual use and requested spares. This method will permit Weld County to avoid expense for unuseit units (unless specifically requested) . The cost for the HOME ESCORT SYSTEM units and related services shall be according to the following rate structure: Page 6 of 13 Pages SIC',ga s $8.50 per day per unit (Weld County staff equipment installation) $9.50 per day per unit (BI Monitoring staff equipment installation) Requested spare units shall be billed at $4.50 per day/per unit. The cost of the CONTRAC Active/Passive System units and related services shall be according to the following rate structure: $6.75 per day per unit (Weld County staff equipment installation) $7.75 per day per unit (BI Monitoring staff equipment installation) The cost for CONTRAC Voice Verification System and related services shall be according to the following rate structure: $4.75 per day per monitored participant (as a stand alone product) $2.50 per day per monitored participant (in conjunction with HOME ESCORT SYSTEM) , plus $ .75 per call in excess of 3 calls per day. The cost for each "Drive-Bi" unit shall be $150.00 per month. These rates shall be in effect for a minimum of one year from the date of final execution of this Agreement. Following this initial one year term, any price changes shall require advance notice of a minimum of 60 days. BI Monitoring will bill Weld County on a monthly basis after the delivery of services. Payment shall be made by Weld County to BI Monitoring within 20 days of receipt of billing. Payment due of greater than 120 days: shall constitute a default of this Agreement and shall suspend or terminate all conditions other than the responsibility for payment. The cost responsibility for lost, stolen, or damaged equipment shall be borne by the participant. Cost shall be determined by the actual cost to BI Monitoring for replacement or repair. weld County will file appropriate criminal charges against any participant who is deemed to have intentionally stolen, destroyed or otherwise made equipment unusable by or unavailable to BI Monitoring and who has failed to reimburse BI Monitoring immediately for the cost of said equipment. Page 7 of 13 Pages St C790 5. Term of Agreement This Agreement shall be effective upon final execution by the appropriate officers of both parties. This Agreement shall continue through , 19 , and shall be automatically renewable year to year unless sooner terminated by notice by either party in accordance with Section VI of this Agreement. 6. Termination This Agreement may be unilaterally terminated, with or without cause, by 30 days written notice, by either party delivered to the other party in accordance with Section 7. - "Notices" . Within 30 days after delivery of said notice, BI Monitoring shall complete its services provided and Weld County shall return in a timely manner all property due to BI Monitoring. BI Monitoring shall be entitled to full payment for services rendered and accepted by Weld County whether during the term of this Agreement or thereafter. 7. Notices Any notice provided for in this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be served by personal delivery or by Certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid at the addresses listed in schedule B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Any notice so mailed and any notice served by personal delivery shall be deemed delivered and effective upon receipt or upon attempted delivery. This method of notification will be used in all instances, except for emergency situations when immediate notification to the Agreement Coordinator of either party is required. 8. Trade Secrets Weld County is obligated to protect the proprietary rights and trade secrets which must be revealed during the course of administering this Agreement. Such obligations shall be for the term of the Agreement and perpetually thereafter. Proprietary rights for the purposes of this Agreement shall include any documents, written procedures, systems, or equipment identified in writing by BI Monitoring through the use of the term "confidential." 9. Participant Confidentiality BI Monitoring will hold confidential all participant information which must be revealed to BI Monitoring by Weld County in the performance of this Agreement. Any request for for participant information by a third party will be referred by BI Monitoring to Weld County. Page 8 of 7.3 Pages Orr 10. Modification and Breach This Agreement and the attached schedules contain the entire Agreement and understanding between the parties and supersedes any other agreements concerning the subject matter of this transaction, whether oral or written. No modification, amendment, novation, renewal or other alteration of or to this Agreement and the attached Schedules shall be deemed valid or of any force or effect whatsoever, unless mutually agreed upon in writing by the parties. No breach of any term, provision or clause of this Agreement and the attached Schedules shall be deemed waived or excused, unless such waiver or consent shall be in writing and signed by the party claimed to have waived or consented. Any consent by any party to, or waiver of, a breach by the other, • whether express or implied, shall not constitute a consent to, or waiver of, or excuse for any other different or subsequent breach. 11. Arbitration Option Any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to this Agreement, or the breach thereof, may be settled by mutual agreement of the parties to arbitration in accordance with the Commercial Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association. Judgment upon the award rendered by the Arbitrators may be entered in any Court having jurisdiction thereof. 12. Monthly Assessment BI Monitoring and Weld County shall conduct an assessment on at least a monthly basis to review the Agreement conditions and working relationship as well as to project business, equipment needs and program continuation. 13. Assignment and Delegation Neither this Agreement nor any of the obligations hereunder may be assigned to any third party by BI Monitoring without the prior consent of weld County. 14. Miscellaneous Provisions A. Scope This Agreement is limited in its scope to its defined purpose. It in no way implies that either party has the specific knowledge or bears responsibility for the business practices of the other party. All business practices outside the defined conditions of this • Agreement and authorized amendments are the sole responsibility of each party. Page 9 of 13 Pages �� 0790 B. Governing Law This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with, and shall be governed by, the laws of the State of Colorado. C. Severability If any term or condition of this Agreement shall be held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable by any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity shall not affect the remaining portions. On the contrary, such remaining portions shall be fully severable, and this Agreement shall be construed and enforced as if such invalid provisions were deleted. D. Headings The subject of headings of the paragraphs of this Agreement are included for purposes of convenience only and shall not affect the construction or interpretation of any of its provisions. Throughout this Agreement, the singular shall include the plural, the plural shall include the singular, and the masculine and neuter shall include the feminine, wherever the context so requires. E. Authority Each signatory to this Agreement represents that he has full and complete authority to bind that party to perform any and all of the provisions of this Agreement. 15. Responsibility for Legal Proceedings BI Monitoring shall be responsible for defending itself and its officers and employees in any civil action brought against BI Monitoring and its officers and employees by any person. Likewise, Weld County shall be responsible for defending itself and its officers and employees in any civil action brought against the County and its officers and employees by any person. BI Monitoring and its officers and employees shall not be deemed to assume any liability for intentional or negligent acts, errors or omissions of the County, or any officer or employee thereof, arising out of the terms of this Agreement. Likewise, the County and its officers and employees shall not be deemed to assume any liability for intentional or negligent acts, errors or omissions of BI Monitoring or any officer or employee thereof, arising out of the performance of the terms of this Agreement. BI Monitoring shall maintain liability insurance in the minimum amount of $1,000,000.00 for bodily injury and Page 10 of 13 Pages ern property damage. Weld County shall be named as a co-insured on any and all such policies. 16. No Third Party Beneficiary Enforcement It is expressly understood and agreed that enforcement of the terms and conditions of this Agreement, and all rights o£ action relating to such enforcement, shall be strictly reserved to BI Monitoring and Weld County and nothing contained in this Agreement shall give or allow any claim or right of action whatsoever by any other person on this Agreement. It is the express intention of BI Monitoring and Weld County that any entity, other than BI Monitoring receiving services or benefits under this Agreement shall be deemed an incidental beneficiary only. ATTEST: Mat BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, ((\111I - WELD CO TY, COLORADO ByegY��- / /- i. 0 D.n� By: Deputy Clerk t the Board ne R. Brantner, C airman AP7F,S TO FORM: attlagalre County Attorney BI MONITORING CORPORATION By: 427-ea Title: 9;recot Ole rL1715 S 1 BED AND SWORN to before me this d ;7 day of , 19 90 WITNESS my hand and official seal. ,iteifit.,2,4,c K - lfil ary Public My commission expires: g y- ;? / 2C0790 Page 11 of 13 Pages SCHEDULE A 1. Until further notice is received, the County Agreement Coordinator shall be: 2. Until further notice is received, BI Monitoring's Agreement Coordinator shall be: Page 12 of 13 Pages 2C�. C.730, SCHEDULE B 1. Any notice to County provided for in this Agreement shall be sent or delivered to: with a copy to: Weld County Attorney 915 Tenth Street P. 0. Box 1948 Greeley, CO 80632 2. Any notice to BI Monitoring provided for in this Agreement shall be sent or delivered to: with a copy to: SIC G790 Page 13 of 13 Pages ,� ,� a 'we ''''''':•-' ,+ Mpg on ,, s. t r ,n • ti 1'j ( a^ t c Sr" l ' PRO POSAY, FOR ET.,EC Thom IC MOW ITORINC; SL' avxcES W'L?LD COYJNTX COL.ORADC7 SHERI FE' • S DEPARTMENT IN RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL BID PROPOSAL NUMBER 000241-90 • 1;0 DUE MAY 29, 1990 'i A `� Submitted by BI MONITORING. CORPORATION ... CORRECTIONAL RESOURCES , INC . 6175 LONGBOW DRIVE BOULDER, COLORADO 80301 it •; 1-800-866-6768 1-303-530-7115 , � . i : ,'if , .'y SCQw3t7► 900523 s } Y k-9��rtJ1..k , • 't'r'�i t .9- s� ti,,r r rr "� .,��.; 0.,r. �.q„ e �N��. +1.. • IN' ROE0UC rION BI Monitoring Corporation offers to establish an electronic monitoring program for the Weld County Sheriff' s Department. This program will be full service in nature. BI Monitoring Corporation will supply all equipment and monitoring services required to operate the program. EQUIPMENT BI Monitoring Corporation acquires the monitoring equipment and host computer system from its parent company BI , Inc. (BI ) of Boulder, Colorado. Three systems are available: The HOME ESCORT SYSTEM - This system is an "active" radio- frequency, continuously signalling system. Its multiple- level , automatic tamper detecting ability makes it the most secure system on the market. Additionally, it is the most reliable and flexible system. The computer support hardware is the NCR 32-400 system. It is multi- tasking, multi-user computer. System features include remote accessing, remote pager option, and a companion "Drive-bi" system. The CONTRAC RF System - This system also is an "active" radio-frequency, continuously signalling system. As a lower end product (when compared to the above system) , tamper detection is limited to visual inspection of the equipment. The CONTRAC VOICE VERIFICATION System - This system is a • "passive" system which randomly calls the program participant at pre-determined locations and performs a voice verification process to confirm presence. The HOME ESCORT SYSTEM and the CONTRAC RF System are active systems. This means that the equipment is active. The etuipment does all the work in tracking the offender. All participant movements are monitored continuously. The offender is never depended upon to confirm his or her presence at the residence. The CONTRAC VOICE VERIFICATION System is a passive system. This means that the participant's movements are not continuously monitored, but rather are randomly checked. This system places random calls to the participant. ,�nn�j�y 2 vC�+S30 Upon each call the participant is required to repeat a selection of words as prompted by the computer. The voice "sample" is compared to a previously supplied voice "template" . When a match occurs the participant is declared as present. The CONTRAC RF and CONTRACT VOICE VERIFICATION Systems may be combined as an "active/passive" system. The level of reliability, security, and sophistication progresses upward from the CONTRAC VOICE VERIFICATION System, CONTRAC RF System. CONTRAC "Active/Passive System, to the HOME ESCORT SYSTEM. BI Monitoring Corporation recommends to the County the HOME ESCORT SYSTEM. This system creates the level o£ security and reliability to permit the widest use. Equipment features and system capability permit expandibility and flexibility which will meet the needs of the County well in to the future. Also recommended is the CONTRAC Voice Verification System. This system can be added to the HOME ESCORT SYSTEM or used as a stand alone product. Voice Verification is particularly effective with low risk, short-term cases. Voice Verification contact can be applied as a random computer based contact or manually performed by monitoring staff. BI Monitoring Corporation uses all available equipment and can match the equipment to the County's needs on a case by case basis. BI is the leader in the radio frequency market. More BI equipment is on the market than any competitive product. Approximately 60% of all radio-frequency equipment on the market has been supplied - by BI. BI also is the leader in "passive" Voice Verification Systems. The HOME ESCORT SYSTEM provides a continuous record (as opposed to an intermittent and random record as with "passive" systems) of offender movements. Any leave or enter during curfew periods results in an automatic alert to BI Monitoring Corporation staff. The status of the equipment is continuously reported. Any offender tampers to the or disconnections o£ the equipment are reported. The computer system is totally flexible in its ability to handle a variety of agency needs. The host system supports remote computer access, remote alarm terminals and direct pager notification of offender violations. This permits operations to be individualized and localized to meet each agency's exact need. 3 e v790 MONITORING S ERV I C E S BI Monitoring Corporation maintains two central monitoring offices. The Western Center is located at the BI , Inc. corporate headquarters in Boulder, Colorado. The Eastern Center is maintained at Anderson, Indiana. As of May, 1990 the two Centers monitor approximately 700 participants daily for over 50 jurisdictions in five time zones. The County would be served by the monitoring center in Boulder, Colorado. BI Monitoring Corporation' s service is comprehensive. All' aspects of electronically monitoring offenders is either fully handled or is coordinated by BI Monitoring, Corporation. BI Monitoring Corporation provides complete training of agency staff regarding the operation and installation of equipment. Once equipment is installed, BI Monitoring Corporation staff monitors offenders on a 24 hour basis. All curfew violations or equipment status problems are immediately discovered by staff. Violations can be reported to agency staff at whatever notification interval staff requests. BI Monitoring Corporation maintains extensive records of offender demographic data and compliance information. A full "hard copy" file is maintained by BI Monitoring Corporation on each agency and each .case for the life of a contract. Of course, the referring agency has full access to this record. SYSTEM CONFIGURATION BI Monitoring Corporation' s current central monitoring office will monitor equipment installed in any location. The system will be configured to add the County as a separate agency. Cases assigned to the agency will be separately managed by the data bank in the computer. The monitoring equipment is designed to call BI Monitoring Corporation' s computer system through the use of 1-800 telephone service. Therefore, from an equipment standpoint, there is no difference between a unit installed in any remote location and one installed 10 miles from the central monitoring office. 4 9CG790 WTiw i:�" w r.• fl ¢g TIME. TABLE Since no equipment changes will be required to establish a program, SI Monitoring Corporation will be prepared to start services as soon as the County is ready. Equipment is in SI Monitoring Corporation' s stock to handle an initial start-up population. Implementation p atation of more than program an immediate population with significant ld require an advance notice of 30-45 days. TARGET POPULATION BI Monitoring Corporation monitors offenders on inmate status , probation, parole, pre-trial and work release status. Both adult and juvenile offenders are monitored. The system has wide application. As an alternative to placement in custody, generally lower risk offenders are selected. To higher risk offendersplaced intensive electronicmo ito ng an placea sion, needed additional controll Electronic monitoring is correctly applied when used to enhance supervision on cases placed in the community as an alternative to a higher level of custody. It is also an excellent tool to use with offenders in the community who require close supervision. Monitoring will permit an officer to control offender impulsivity, potential criminal activity and public alcohol and drug abuse. SI Monitoring Corporation will be pleased to present detail regarding system capability and case supervision benefits. The referring agency, o£ course, will establish placement criteria. Therefore, the actual selection of offenders for placement will be entirely handled by the County. 5 9C0790 ti5. r s r COST The following costs are presented to provide to the County flexibility in choosing the equipment and installation method which best meet the need. The County may develop an agreement with BI Monitoring Corporation which will permit the County to pick and choose the equipment which matches participant and agency needs and risks. EQUIPMENT COST PER DAY/PER UNIT HOME ESCORT SYSTEM S8.50 CONTRAC VOICE VERIFICATION $4-75 (AS A STAND ALONE PRODUCT) CONTRAC VOICE VERIFICATION $2.50 ( IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE HOME ESCORT SYSTEM) An additional cost of $1.00 per day/per unit would be charged for monitoring staff to perform equipment installation. The County ma_y decide to receive training from BI Monitoring Corporation staff and perform installations or may choose to have installations performed by monitoring staff. Summary The cost for HOME ESCORT SYSTEM is $8.50 per day/per unit in use (county staff installations) or $9-50 per day/per unit in use (monitoring staff installations) . The cost for CONTRAC Voice Verification System operating as a stand alone product (without the HOME ESCORT SYSTEM) is $4.75 per day/ participant. The cost for the CONTRAC Voice Verification System used with the HOME ESCORT SYSTEM is $8.50 or $9.50 (as indicated above) per day/per unit (for HES) plus $2.50 per day/per monitored participant. f These costs represent the total costs for all equipment, monitoring, and staff training as described in this proposal . SC 0'790 6 linen CON' IEUss.CT INFoB_marION BI Monitoring Corporation will supply services based upon a simple contract or letter of agreement. This document should specify services to be delivered, each party' s responsibilities , performance standards , payment amount and billing procedures and renewal/termination methods. The proposed contract terms are understood and are acceptable to BI Monitoring Corporation. XHPL.EMEN MAX'ION PLAN BI Monitoring Corporation is fully committed to immediately initiating an electronic monitoring program for the County within the time frame required. From BI Monitoring Corporation' s perspective, the actual steps involved in developing the program from the concept stage to implementation are as follows_ Receive a positive decision from the County; • Establish early program and population parameters; Develep a formal written agreement; Establish a target date and specify initial population; Train agency staff; Refine monitoring office procedures; Install initial equipment and begin monitoring. BI Monitoring Corporation will 'be available to advance this process at the speed desired by the County. Literally, due to the availability of equipment and the proximity of the monitoring center, implementation could take place within a few days. • IL/C©(9U RESOLUTION RE: REGULATING, WARNING AND GUIDING TRAFFIC DURING THE TEMPORARY CLOSURE OF WELD COUNTY ROAD 53 BETWEEN WELD COUNTY ROADS 42 AND 44 FOR APPROXIMATELY 15 WORKING DAYS FOR BRIDGE REPLACEMENT WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the WM1ld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 42-4-410 (6) (a) , CRS: " . . .local authorities, with their respective jurisdiction, may for the purpose of road construction and maintenance, temporarily close to through traffic or to all vehicular traffic any highway or portion thereof for a period not to exceed a specified number of work days for project completion and shall, in conjunction with any such road closure establish appropriate detours or provide for an alternative routing of the traffic affected. . ." , and WHEREAS, the Board, pursuant to said statute and upon the basis of traffic and personal investigations, has determined that conditions exist which make it necessary to temporarily close to through traffic and to regulate, warn and guide vehicular traffic on said County roads by posting signs thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, deems it necessary to regulate, warn and guide vehicular traffic on County roads and any intersections thereof, and it hereby authorizes and orders the posting of such traffic control devices as shall be reasonably necessary to regulate, warn and/or guide traffic thereon for the safety of the general public and that said traffic control devices shall conform to the Federal Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, does declare and establish that Weld County Road 53 between Weld County Roads 42 and 44 be temporarily closed, with said closure being effective September 4, 1990, for approximately 15 working days, and further, that standard official traffic control devices shall be erected at said closure giving notice of the restrictions. 900792 Page 2. RE: TEMPORARY CLOSURE - WCR 53 The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 5th day of September, A.D. , 1990, nunc pro tunc September 4, 1990. laahBOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: WEL OUNTY, C�7I,ORADO Weld County C er to the Board h f ne R. Brantner, C airman BY: attlei 71 �1j2///0 Ge9ge RenKedy�o-Te3i— V DeputypClerk to the Board APPROVED AS TO FORM: Constance . Harbert C.W. Kirby County Attorney EXCUSED Gordon E. Lacy 900792 'f MEMORAnDum Clerk to the Board September 4, 19 To Data n George Goodell, Director of Road and Bridge l,L, COLORADO From • -.l Road Closure subowt: The following road was closed September 4, 1990 for a bridge replacement. It should be closed for approximately 15 working days. Please place this on the Board's next agenda: WCR 53 between WCR 42 & WCR 44 GG/mw:frc xc: Commissioner Kirby Weld County Dispatch Weld County Sheriff's Office WCR's 53, 42, 44 900792 `:�.▪ - M ▪ .. . O 3 - wcR c4 i--t N --- -f I lipe. 72T ba✓vica e 1 • - __ - wl N;g1,+ Plastic,- ' • y..� borrf ease ,cud t hosed m~� (Al nil it osc ci s� r �� -- !Ae t6v✓ �r�a wS • cocci IrGc, c a N � cocciy - / . , Gick 9a . 41 ---- LPjou✓ 7so • 0 —12.oad Olcced AApad :Pep d- CioSPa Q/VIc/4 A✓ hil'%� lei)1tcPfr-•o�`� . ./ / JJ ri/ua �). For O1j6,Ojc; Gc^O-IP1 f a20ouovl ;in CZ"/S ' i ITL= ../2-em/ 0(rs u t...., .c2 53 of ware if,- u 2 d ,ra wil s-'lorry Dv - 0:.:_ Dr“.NR sr /;"vr DCZ c//4/Q0 _ C-Mr.r.:D 6Y - �� Ca TNTY ROAD A'211— . APPRoV BY COUNTY ErZair:::ER E','D ST0792 RESOLUTION RE: REGULATING, WARNING AND GUIDING TRAFFIC DURING THE TEMPORARY CLOSURE OF WELD COUNTY ROAD 18 BETWEEN WELD COUNTY ROADS 73 AND 753 OVERNIGHT ONLY FOR CULVERT WORK WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, pursuant to section 42-4-410 (6) (a) , CRS: " . . .local authorities, with their respective jurisdiction, may for the purpose of road construction and maintenance, temporarily close to through traffic or to all vehicular traffic any highway or portion thereof for a period not to exceed a specified number of work days for project completion and shall, in conjunction with any such road closure establish appropriate detours or provide for an alternative routing of the traffic affected. . . " , and WHEREAS, the Board, pursuant to said statute and upon the basis of traffic and personal investigations, has determined that conditions exist which make it necessary to temporarily close to through traffic and to regulate, warn and guide vehicular traffic on said County roads by posting signs thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of County Commissioners of weld County, Colorado, deems it necessary to regulate, warn and guide vehicular traffic on County roads and any intersections thereof, and it hereby authorizes and orders the posting of such traffic control devices as shall be reasonably necessary to regulate, warn and/or guide traffic thereon for the safety of the general public and that said traffic control devices shall conform to the Federal Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Rz BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, does declare and establish that Weld County Road 18 between Weld County Roads 73 and 75} be temporarily closed, with said closure being effective August 30, 1990, overnight only, and further, that standard official traffic control devices shall be erected at said closure giving notice of the restrictions. 900793 n n 0.0 c7.14 ce ^ / a CD 0 57� Page 2 RE: TEMPORARY CLOSURE - WCR 18 The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made • and seconded, adopted by the fallowing vote or the Sth day of September, A.D. , 1990, nunc pro tunc August 30, 1990. BOA F COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: I�ll QO/A��G� WEL UNTY, COLORADO/ Weld County Clerk to the Board A .ene R. Bran ner Chairman sY: Ply` 7� 11�IN a ge Ke ne y, Pro-Tem Deputr Clerk to the Board I �/ APPROVED AS TO FORM: Constance L. Ha ert C.W. Kxrbycr .'r County Attorne EXCUSED Gordon E. Lacy 900793 'et,'{!�� MEMORAnDUM Wilk Clerk to the Board August 30, 1990 /� To_ Dote George Goodell, Director of Road and Bridge //`YJJ/ COLORADO From_ Road Closure subject The following road was closed August 30, 1990 for culvert work. It should be closed overnight only. Please place this on the Board's next agenda: WCR 18 between WCR 73 & WCR 75.5 GG/mw:frc xc: Commissioner Kirby Weld County Dispatch Weld County Sheriff's Office WCR's 18, 73, 75.5 900793 �,�,� ,,.,.,..r- • . .. . . . N ......„.............,".. ....... • ..* . •.. ' -V.i V C . . n. . loom',caJ�. fl � , � tosker' -.1 0-s W f �, Qtosed ` � ��i. Arrows� � 1 . � • ca f Ire,-��'1 G 6 0 � � t 3. r WGX 1% I r� fader far O' T ve L CloS1' e{ w N*1id' l6se`� • °� Fa44 . FC`a g C tosect J /f o vole-r' J vjh q0 rep ta w cE 7S /,'Nc,�P Cg I� Gf wca- . \ .TITLF:' 1 ) 0...i.... ,..xpro/00 1:1,,....... °"`73,,,, .• ; R ,;Y ccrj! ..- 1 v;...- 1 / , Arm . .: : : . J - e - . N _.___ . -in, -: CZ? oe. I f e tr borr;co.�2 v eo a .7:1J -- V wIA, kt P/Oi.T it 3 i I 3 Baud erosed � a s !fie �dv✓ Ar ' . /rows Zoca/ "2.:air; el ly I - • O O WM r8 j A '—I O, /' Orri Cac�� 54op /i•.ce � ,b w111/9k1- PlosAl er- X4d C lased - • Road CtoSed 7/3o/go 0 vet Pi;yk -- For cut.ev"r rep lace ve,pNf 7 �Gct 07,-Nike wc2 /R c 71 wc.2. 75 N kick 74 3� .TI TL L_ , SJEVCf BY fri DA TI--- • a `�ftr-- DC Vrake pRAwn Sr � , - /�/ G�rG�D BY - - D-TE COJA7Y ROAD N:. /ell APPROVED BY COW :TY cuctrC=ER WELD COUNTY DERARTt =IC Or ENGINEER :: I 9t.0' 93 a RESOLUTION RE: REGULATING, WARNING AND GUIDING TRAFFIC DURING THE TEMPORARY CLOSURE OF WELD COUNTY ROAD 17 BETWEEN U.S. HIGHWAY 34 AND WELD COUNTY ROAD 60 FOR APPROXIMATELY TWO WORKING DAYS FOR RAILROAD REPAIR WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority o£ administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 42-4-410 (6) (a) , CRS: ". . .local authorities, with their respective jurisdiction, may for the purpose of road construction and maintenance, temporarily close to through traffic or to all vehicular traffic any highway or portion thereof for a period not to exceed a specified number of work days for project completion and shall, in conjunction with any such road closure establish appropriate detours or provide for an alternative routing of the traffic affected. . ." , and WHEREAS, the Board, pursuant to said statute and upon the basis of traffic and personal investigations, has determined that conditions exist which make it necessary to temporarily close to through traffic and to regulate, warn and guide vehicular traffic on said County roads by posting signs thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, deems it necessary to regulate, warn and guide vehicular traffic on County roads and any intersections thereof, and it hereby authorizes and orders the posting of such traffic control devices as shall be reasonably necessary to regulate, warn and/or guide traffic thereon for the safety of the general public and that said traffic control devices shall conform to the Federal Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, does declare and establish that Weld County Road 17 between U.S. Highway 34 and Weld County Road 60 be temporarily closed, with said closure being effective August 27, 1990, for approximately two working days, and further, that standard official traffic control devices shall be erected at said closure giving notice of the restrictions. 900794 Page 2 RE: TEMPORARY CLOSURE - WCR 17 The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 5th day of September, A.D. , 1990, nunc pro tunc August 27, 1990. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: M1444WEL OUNTY, COLORADO Weld County Clerk to the Board �� /fZGe i ene R. Brantner, C airman BY: SQ Ge rgdy, Pro-Tem Deputy glerk to the Board ---O?! rermte` ' APPROVED AS TO FORM: Constance L. Har ert • C.W. K rby� County Attorney EXCUSED Gordon E. Lacy 900794 A " teal MEMORAnDUAI Wilk Clerk to the Board August 27, 1990 Yo De,s George Goodell, Director of Road and Bridge occpan ` COLORADO From Road Closure Submou The following road was closed August 27, 1990 for railroad repair. It will be closed approximately two working days. Please place this on the Board's next agenda: WCR 17 between Hwy 34 & WCR 60 i~ GG/mw:frc xc: Commissioner Kirby Weld County Dispatch Weld County Sheriff's Office WCR's 17, 60 900794 �.. _. - _ lea ._.__ _,_,^.---.- "� 3 Clued Mock ,.- �, - (A/CS 6 G N +f Type Erthre;cue_ ~---7:zz `w N'y at Pl°slin / . go4 d e ksed -. Type iu Joateicacle wI N,9Nf Pla 5A pr • b R4 e(4SP r ,elavv A(raw - N. A.,cof lie 04;C oN(, h4 3 • r-1, sf Hal 31 {load 0tes.e4 3187190 Fpr 4 4004/.5 clays c6 r Rig repgir- S. TITIS 1tike d 0451/re w c.e /7 4 it S5` ,/...J../ 3r 1 ace G.,O , asvcr EY C == DRAWN SY M arc- DATE. a� 9a C-1B-T.ED BY _ C:= - COUNTY ROAD tiW2-2-. -APPROVED Sr COUNTY EtwUZZE . `7LF) D COUNTY DEPARTIVFI r G= ENGIN`r-RUC: 1 SCE-: .. RESOLUTION RE: REGULATING, WARNING AND GUIDING TRAFFIC DURING THE TEMPORARY CLOSURE OF WELD COUNTY ROAD 84 BETWEEN WELD COUNTY ROADS 21 AND 23 FOR APPROXIMATELY 16 WORKING DAYS FOR BRIDGE INSTALLATION WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 42-4-410 (6) (a) , CRS: ". . .local authorities, with their respective jurisdiction, may for the purpose of road construction and maintenance, temporarily close to through traffic or to all vehicular traffic any highway or portion thereof for a period not to exceed a specified number of work days for project completion and shall, in conjunction with any such road closure establish appropriate detours or provide for an alternative routing of the traffic affected. . ." , and WHEREAS, the Board, pursuant to said statute and upon the basis of traffic and personal investigations, has determined that conditions exist which make it necessary to temporarily close to through traffic and to regulate, warn and guide vehicular traffic on said County roads by posting signs thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, deems it necessary to regulate, warn and guide vehicular traffic on County roads and any intersections thereof, and it hereby authorizes and orders the posting of such traffic control devices as shall be reasonably necessary to regulate, warn and/or guide traffic thereon for the safety of the general public and that said traffic control devices shall conform to the Federal Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, does declare and establish that Weld County Road 84 between Weld County Roads 21 and 23 be temporarily closed, with said closure being effective August 29, 1990, for approximately 16 working days, and further, that standard official traffic control devices shall be erected at said closure giving notice of the restrictions. 900795 F goo�el O) P Page 2 RE: TEMPORARY CLOSURE - WCR 84 The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 5th day of September, A.D. , 1990, nunc pro tune August 27, 1990. ATTEST: Mat BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WE OUNTY, COLORADO Weld County Clerk to the Board 'nee Gene R. Brantner�an 113- BY: 3/,044.1C inceizAl a rge K nne yd , Pro-Tem Deputy Xlerk to the Board �/ APPROVED AS TO FORM: onstance j a er ---77"-------efi.-- C.W. �� `��-' /County Attorney EXCUSED Gordon E. Lacy 900795 y � MEMORAI DUM Wilk Clerk to the Board August 29, 1990 To _on. l George Goodell, Director of Road and Bridge / /�ni / COLORADO From ( GV Road Closure Subject: The following road was closed August 29, 1990 for a new bridge installation. It will be closed approximately 16 working days. Please place this on the Board's next agenda: WCR 84 between WCR 21 & WCR 23 GG/mw:frc xc: Commissioner Kirby Weld County Dispatch Weld County Sheriff's Office WCR's 21, 23, 84 900795 =��- _ -">_.-�.._ . 4,. . _. N == -- .= • • % . _ o c -0 • 1 'Me -.W.. loaf if; cad.e_ v �.-- 1 .4 Ix L wile $i . , I / \ TV lie .�I/T� b0 re; code_ m �p ,per � 64.1 Nli Type tl'arAfe C"' 2 Zc RoJad Closed 'Si A3 Oe imV or /free 'Li • b66 CO / T✓G��G C~ 17 Re ocl eiosPd C/99/90 Far 10r,dii e_ rep laCPN+ea f' . • (gig/el/ 4 For 9 AD/ox;Pro1Py /5- work?, CI Y TITLE Pock Ptos(dre wcR V/ of wce a/ g kit* 023 S.CtiV.f.-r eY OAT: F O C-15 .:.D SY =Tr. . CO:.IN= RO:.D tat 2ill APPROVED 6Y COUNTY Et:C:.:Ea, WELD COUNTY DERA,R7MrIC C'= EN:..-3 rrRiN 9C0793 �. �� w�� r / ,k'o(`// t, 'M,1"\1.41/04)7/Cg lifit I is }G�`. •a or c:,---#.9-1- °<.,Si 1 rf/ rfM?i �611R�,,\,•� e i�r -Ja'Jo.+ryy 1,„,, " R,, . ,, c:5"▪� "`v�l rJ'�i•)`R �� l ` �� '''V`�yManv -1 �Q ;>i` �y�l��r �':.. ��" Y 17f'j. gy�� ,- i l '41 " •to OP_ ,' -'<p - co •e.. i P.:,/ !gyl/.. Bill II �� t� w�� u 1.+ �k� �• e� [ ' a \ .S it*,I.' ''', it;, \� III VIII II II � >Cli _ 1" M - '.� i r )4,ly `' ,g 1 \/ rile�:�k�\� -� �I�'� IIII'I:IIIIIIII :��K� �+A� 'H WSV - ‘� AH �� IN ttag�{,4it f h/+n• .P.ti�ro"f ♦ I' IIII IIII 1 -\___v-.., O d ��ti3 'T � - : - I I Sl I N !(it. ''Ni be v ', '1 ' VIII I I , wV � it : i t 4,rj � '.trc: F„ �'�"+' `� III 11 ,'IIIIIIII \ u��:. Ky} \- f ►, - 41/4-‘-.,‘.• IBC! 4 t it .-- C _,,�. �AMI IIIII lie t • 4' ''`""'r� '. '• 1 N I!I I ilk,Dill...., I I -\- c' _� -m 0‘::;\ - �- \ \� , ' 1 4}}, if tlr""'(//,.�,, r1 �./ "�. x,--. II I ,:III ��C Uv�A �� t`� A `v,- t[f4 � ' y�i.,ret. I ,II I �� -\� T ` _ � �'•. I " \ d , it l fitlh �r J II 1p S yZ V I •j - �1IIIII l I I ��w• �(>G �� co .-1 - \�r q IE��[[�l[[ty[+ �1 t, " -. • �.. l.t i . ; i II§rpyJJ' I IIII ( I:II i vTh �N � -m d ' A .• M F}1' rris 1 i 1 A Vi r U4qf f(r _ I IIII III ' I � d '..L.7 N � N �. LW[r i 44- '' � ll III IIII II I I I II I I `~\ aF. a . 0 3 'i �� c Iae(t € y r'A ,r,� "we)`�: L_ I IIIIIIIIIIII I II�II'I III 4`.7\\%=—\\v__, ‘- dam , oo �� [°v ti . [e �'. 1 ffeet Co},�� " II c.. v \ S • v n)/! \�--. I I LW�� O G � � Ye o. !ff Cc 13»" wr, 4 /..r,-.• GG I II l , III_� o ° -40 o t ie4Z, p, , 1 , ti `�fC e� ��c' IIIIII II II I'I II I'I I II "\--, �_�= a ,"+v- �` �d� �w%Ttrit4e/ inn c. r, r ,`��'l, IIIVIIIII I II l ,��i3O -.\,...--,,.;--,•=7;,\-_--±"'-- � .O 0. ` le .S. iY r� '7^�1 r tir it -- -V�" / III I I Ilil,iI II IIIIII u-��•- +[ - _ C t r 4 1um-4o w,�. At I .4:,,., I II -- `.I�. �> [i[rtfPriir� t v}ii I II Ili!, III m �� ro�� >+ 4 1:1• i , S : yam.-"�. / RI � III III �'p��'��-� m.r..�\ ,��p :� �.i, Ctt lryt.$,I Aj �V^•: I II � �, _ eo .�. �, 5 NI r .� _ .-- , ' III f�I,III I -�q.� _., L - <, a' - IIIIIIII I�'I VIII 'l K.:\�'-�'` w ��1\ _ rj'1W �"�� S �y y. ^>,: }I I III Ill j !III I �' T.��- \ ,ice.'+` .d t, s •b/ /�•: F• �'�� aa� iII ll I t I III --=',:e--.->'a----..:-._;;;,----5. -I,„":17- c a � i 11: 1.-... ....,:-..".' �i. VIIIIiItiIIIIIIIIIII II, —�,r' �,�v m "' sr+ ..— ... .,,.• r� 0 i / 4 II IIIIII IIII Hill 1� G"v oQ N� C1, C4�y ✓y/�/f `or ,�'. � .^�-7,-_I, :J�+'�lull ' III I -�.V ? 2 � _ ,t,,,..„ �?r�t - �"li• s. /�j��',1��,� j ., rte, -I I ,lI, �'I�I I . �¢-•- iii-C. �W '-,5-4. ,a.� /1�5$da..O.?n �. 'T'!y + 1 ��• III ry ti•6/� /-r0 V.�-WC7+ 1• :vp�l ' �� tw 1 Iu'al II 1 I -A- dam/ -u 44.00-- �, r , * i tr,` '" 'I 1 I i I l� � V,.�& ' ! ' \w •mot^ ;/- + ^1 . �eF 'III III III �`ixO'd✓K ^y, W' ,. "� •Ink a. f< F •_��-i`J . �I II I' �il IIIIIIII IIIIII I ' I. `-ek ie III.34 - N Imo;{ 1�,/ . '«'if �I � I I I III l le:1^�"' .+ i-- nsr-.,r- oar-- - (4.4 ,r3L, 1 r .d 1'V III IIII a ,�o.��m r- I.4, 4 C�rc( '`,}+t� , 1▪ ''- ..��,�* lI , I,I I III II "��Jr O/F �' 1-_, t,$S�C(f C ''r . �1 — A I'l' ' II I IIIIIII ��.,-4i�—�.4 j`_ f '/ r P 1“%ac ty!l I t4,,i,t rr ~~�'L/ I III ,v mY� m�/� 4' -f O /�/ !<esce. C I "i•' \��+ �C ill III (IIII I I a- o/'l ji.£-_a`�la iy rr t: .74. c �l /, 'II I'' II ti7 �� - vCrr l �� i 1:/ ��t inn :lye?t� E[�[C�j }ay�ch ' e� •;A. III Pill III .��Q ,- —`j/ %;� "-" / �i • .ktt Wit, i�C 1�-y:. ▪l• I .� , ] I ri-/='_ _-%-- r-W H'o% r J// .I !rC}'♦y1 r c• rrv�f ' ``�J J� VIII I II II IIIIII IIII i`� J+/ ?: %�iw / m if IO ....NV �r eefee4 � ' u�i f .;. '. .-k i • i P III i ,I,I ��dm�f�� j i -- .tik [4 • t` . f1r�•!: IIIIIIII IIII .. �f -, � z., ° V I I _!t% cr1s�K J ,� .t [ a' a ^� -; a C I IIII III � III - f�/ �l � P:✓ ✓ �J� >4.2--.2„-ii °� J " f fC�A` ,•,,,,,,‘::‘ . ay ,isic > I ' IIIIII IIII II:I) / �/ -m c atjlf�%�wk'13, 4 w, ✓ 7 •' MIL: '/ j� r ig, �h_> % q �t ItCl�a r � p r 7 III �I �)II.19 �. c- -M"� � . ir A ;��y�•}'�4;C/qq• ,�"*r�l�.y✓ • p"▪ •—•> 'rr" { I(�9.'� 'II III' I IIII �� b i'St /r '�yV�LS•(SCCC , K'�C�(T , , _. Mi IIIIIII. IIII IIIIII _ J �O' jy.� /�/� oil I r yY��i i�C � �ti` ti t`• i Tiv, ' IIII II. I I II, IIII d'/� f" '`aa� 6, ? �i;titi#�CCC41 � �K? yrei r. i , VIII�I'.., II IIIIIIII / z , / t • t sCCC ,ems•� r .4. •r /, / � s! `I !rt.,. IIII III 1 i A✓ OY .,.•.•0.8)...-/, /p 4 ( �(, r , / rI'IIIIIII,I,I,„I /_.�- �� ,� d� I," 1 N Jowl. .,„ i •• •� � K _s o de'`.�f ;I I IIli I[ I l r �� 4Y// �� m! l 00 ° �/IVL:-1 0V. ., ;($ , v q ti ` 5 / l IIIIIIII�µI Ili' N�� / �J � � �4jritt x[S >,�� ,:, _-,*::_---,e: + ) i -� IIIIIII IJII IIIIII J,---- m/' reCV7,1p- - ('re ( �i' F •} 'l 't, _ ;:' _ _mf V rf` ~j r'"''�1� ;. .•/r '; :�y7L� r ` `�v J'rs /�� i!fie /f f�kr4 4S,_so••C��_.,%, ; M• t/ l - /lf� ( - k . .t. e.,a • -w \l 'x"` r^�. yJ'� x,,rry-. $,,� sn ,. r a _ �.. rw J ` y4 { , eesz1 f/I�/F •.�, 2. ea r � , "7kip,+-.�we.1n. c, 1}, f.» , �( Ia t,n . ,..rf - ":r,d,r•�le 1 `At .ser �//i'.;yn A,`"':U T;;3 �J .Yc 1 .qtr .,7.. t • {. 7 �.::-:,ral X. .1. 1to°0 EGco7 ----------c.----, l , N� - ,[ J �. .,, '° K A'v ` �tL/!i * •,44,t4. ' �;�j v �"� t i�j t.F'� !≤'� ,,,A f '..fit t • , t� vh�a a \ 0 a .• 1,j 1//1 t... tll� E ". �a y ,� t i MY d r ./..,/ ° s t .ip ) ham/ y/i li, M[.]h)� CJI�_I CJIj_Ir. y �/g\(F rit y' / '�*~1+ FAS ;�, `Ii�:A kektA 'I :I1t:�'• 1� '� +� .pS:A' T '/ Y ' j if *P.:.I�T.i~ '14 A , qty. ✓� �JJ/I�'(J(// III/l Li �� Jr J �/ •krat�' �)y yy s }a(/ tll O,/ r( � l� III 'IJIIj =: `\ 4 �\ '°, I_ 4:e*4 41 IIY,y'i!/L' foot/Hi / f-.� !ID.,i//��/g >_� JLi'III!, I� 11 � � ,',.-Yet."-t >A1))....1100 ! e), '4�i /i`y i ,, Y/ .-2/1 n �J�� f0= I I.,i I } - • �. te, •41, .. \� N), � 7� �� . . /_, I I I 'I III I >/ML !t °TP: �� ! f ��N-t•A � I III i- 'v } i i t f p, 00 4 - r 7 -' y JJ �/� �, r-y r . �s-�',��,:-.4, lS c.‘,.•-. ',,,,e7--4N14.-3,-01,,8111.4 441 r� ��t'V"'- tr ,_ I�I I' ii, IIII• 1 `N`��µ` G'y tr V�I 'Wtt �Y� srs 'q �/ y___ �../ it �I VIII / „3.-.. . , �, �j l �r is p� f �� II IIII; � � i Ir�iA�� i// I �� J / p,�� I� VIII ��yFy` k 1, A - f� �J I I I J. V / O % - G t�f °0. W i- I l .A. l� al! �� z>J„ 2,;(41"-�t�.r�� III ili,rii!illilli,lillilliiiIIIIIIIIII i'i i ' �F�.i � $y. I 'Am J � m��. IIli �� _ 1 "`�' �J3` 3 �� _ / �„ry,�/`� —/ III l' i . a , r �� / N �j0 H �.. � �J I� I •l : �� 41 f? VI /- / {p 1 V I- j^ p qy� +A// iii r r,�J/�-S"=� 'D '� . II lA ".\I��e J i� tVii q} �). �v7. i• w7 -3._fr'A?n -��,--i� III 'till;y CI G' r`: A , i i1y 0 .r d - /i �� a v / W '7 =�� /' III t 11 Y H ��J L. i _•�' „I„ �� „°�° e-Teru-±/ J <' _� I I I IIII III IIII xx-- N `�, .. �) F a �' ▪ 0) --;‘,"2:1gr�`m-✓ I 'III is III �^ ..,+ • '//s6(i,• t Y . "'a`r -= ro J,r —n f, �-�4 I It �I II I �I�I �. �L. �,it� (A.{ % , - aj -,--..,.,,:e;?:' `f7D - c7,4,-;-?- �"ri��v I.� , ' ,I • ' ,::--� • iI T: J d �,`,^'y, •�rf '_h70 I IIII .IIIIII .'�+• S J V`F !.',} M M p, p �=c�fp v I 1 iI III :t,ii i (, er ,u�..,.., k,r ___ td _'' W 7 ..--r---.M 1 IIII II ICI I it 1 -/ I'VE II, i N .s1-. �_� I c+ �� . W. i �,,_ _,0 G 6. -C - Ay fill �I �11 I ti�� t ter/ � � '. ,'*--..e."-'`y�or".� H 1;0- n`O� �I MITI I' IIII .' �/ 1 v /.4 A� ,..`. ,°"„,-,-.r+..3 ,."q TAa -W o. '45R�1" rI,' VIII( ,' 'J . '�_ :P +�` v «. t _ O W �C • i,� ul II I II �� ,*".e. 1 ,7;',1:(.1( J�' .r\ r•,A f! �� }+ t.;" - '�v\� III III ll IIII 1 II� � I '�1 li }'(�1 .� `E!>-, '�' ,�., M+' rr _ P.a) ao if 1_�� d—`� I I I I I I IIIII i I II /, •.i l j . • tl� i gh�risk,'.. ",':;I iw `'mow `^-1=m U~i.� -am--•-- 1I' e_ ,k11:),1; ) -y k}9 i 1, 11 a� A � Iii, ill III II ItII IIIIII C �_�� Sr 1 S �.� 1.`� I III �- 3 y{ "^.� � �.,� �A "\ w IIIII�� i':III,I�� ..—\_ . ) 'r�"",. � J� � � _ a3-,c -�� "��=no �I III �II I� J��^'\ irk. r ( . rJi Y Y A� , �tt'w'{y \ w n ��V • I a{. IIIIIIiI Il fL'71/ ./� A cp:N r M _� , o •e o� .ate III Al pill J:t �. vf, 24•e�;71 • i � 1jt ''' t �.t 17 .� O�-- ----•'&11>Oc 1 III I I �� y' .� r O i� - rt O :±.---,::-.= �� III III I I ', I � > i1 .b 1' tit ;p 1/4k, 7III 1 1 —\_. �` 4/ ""' i J �)1 j `N '. O �gd' - N 'I0 � jll ill III -rat I • I �jl ;C �\ , rm �1 70 �.n� IIII III 141 IIIii,I I\i ��. 1 c ( ii •1I n � al.. w " <n� I�'I .4 I III Imo' ,./., ,,� k "` O'\ t t'% \_�� „.".--_--,..\,, A ---;•'‘ `�ti-7•A ..a I Ili I II Ili 1. p,. l" Ai ,r.' ' ''::;43 m ,rip i.�€(T• i��+I �a � .-\- 6 l �, J • i. .lid .\� �x�IC • �� s � m Jr.-, ---Z--- _,•-3-. `1� III I ili r.i IIIiIII I I,•I II \; !t '�'�A M�8 'A �� 1 � `.^4 µ ``��M �� I I III I Iy,II i•I \t/F� ?i<jt�.^. � ' , 4-- _ ti N N �ti t1 / vt. I . V 3 a7, 0 y m m �� Cr �t _ , l II IIII el III I � ./� / � ( I� M • '1 • a ?' t 'a- II I IIII � I�I : - I 1f �..'� / I 't4 I a rt �� d m M "y.. t�� I I I III � f,.�r_j \i �� pp 1�1 I n• f tO - h <.� `C �II0 iII 'I I �_�� ''', S' AR I �� • :� co O _ `�� _\.� � 11111 II'l 11111 IIII l �" /, .' . 'ti i` z t �r �x �� v ll-- `, t'9� ,w,Rw. ffifr . L pia il, 'i� '1, \N t , .f «�vi' 1 MEMORAnDUM aleClerk to the Board September 19, 1990 To Data Denny Graham, Civil Engineer II COLORADO From Contract with Paramount Construction Co. sumeca Attached are the following signed documents: 1. Notice of Award 2. Acceptance o£ Award 3. Agreement 4. Performance Bond No. 5082732 5. Payment of Bond No. 5082732 6. Power of Attorney 7. Insurance Binder for Builders Risk 8. Certificate of Insurance including Workmen's Compensation Insurance This memo is transmitted for your information and file. DG/zw:zdmcb cc: Commissioner Kirby File ZOI/S 7 NOTICE OF AWARD T0: Paramount Construction. Inc. 363 S. Harlan St, Suite 209 Lakewood, CO 80226 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Combined Weld County Bridges 78/13A and 80.5/17A The County, represented by the undersigned, has considered the bid submitted by you for the above described work in response to its Advertisement for Bids dated Aukust 2 , 1990. You are hereby notified that your bid has been accepted for Construction o£ Weld County Bridges 78/13A and 80.5/17A in the amount of Two Hundred Sixty Three Thousand Dollars and no/100's ($ 263,000.00 ). You are required by the Information for Bidders to execute the Agreement and furnish the required Contractor's Performance Bond, Payment Bond, and Certificates of Insurance within ten (10) calendar days from the date of this Notice to you. If you fail to execute said Agreement and to furnish said bonds within ten (10) days from the date of this Notice, said County will be entitled to consider all your rights arising out of the County's acceptance of your bid as abandoned and as a forfeiture of your Bid Bond. The County will be entitled to such other rights as may be granted by law. You are required to return an acknowledged copy of this Notice of Award to the County. Dated this 5 day of September , 1990. THE BOARD OF WELD COUNTY COMMISSIONERS (County) ATTEST: /0 Pda4e4BY: X r i� Weld County Clerk to Board CCLLIIjjTitle: Chairman By%.%lab !1, /ndkb 19 Deputy�lerk to Board SC Ora I ACCEPTANCE OF NOTICE Receipt of the above Notice of Award is hereby acknowledged by Paramount Construction, Inc. this the 14th day of September , 1990. BY: chael W. Moffitt Title: Pres' IMPORTANT: Surety companies executing bonds must appear n the Treasury Department's most current list (circular 570 as amended) and be authorized to transact business in the State o£ Colorado. 20 eC© il3 eat, 751 AGREEKENT THIS AGREEMENT, made this 5th day of September , 1990, by and between THE BOARD OF WELD COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, and Paramount Construction, Inc. doing business as Paramount Construction, Inc. hereinafter called "contractor". WITNESSETH: That for and in consideration of the payments and agreements hereinafter mentioned: 1. The contractor will commence and complete the phased construction of combined: Weld County Bridges 78/13A and 80.5/I7A 2. The contractor shall furnish all material, supplies. tools, equipment, labor and other services necessary for the construction and completion of the project described herein. 3. The contractor shall commence the work required by the Contract Documents in accordance with the date stated in the y Special Conditions ani shall complete the work within the time stated in the Special Conditions unless the period for completion is extended otherwise by the Contract Documents. 4. The contractor agrees to perform all of the work described in the Contract Documents and comply with the terms of therein for the sum of: Two Hundred Sixty Three Thousand Dollars and no/100's (g 263,000.00 } for the combined project: Weld County Bridges 78/13A and 80.5/17A 21 9C®Bir8 • 5. The term "Contract Documents" means and includes the following: (A) Advertisement (B) Information for Bidders (C) Non-Collusion Statement (D) Bid (E) Bid Schedule (F) Bid Bond (G) Notice of Award (H) Acceptance of Notice (I) Agreement (J) Performance Bond (K) Payment Bond (L) Notice to Proceed (M) Change Order (N) Notice of Contractor's Settlement (0) Final Receipt and Guarantee (P) Special Conditions (Q) General Conditions (R) Technical Provisions (S) Construction Drawings (T) Addendum No. 1 , dated August 9 , 1990 No. 2 , dated August 15 , 1990 No. , dated , 1990 6. The County will pay the contractor in the manner and at such time as set forth in the General Conditions such amounts required by the Contract Documents. 7. This Agreement shall be binding upon all parties hereto and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns. ©ear), 3 22 • • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed, or caused to be executed by their duly authorized officials, this Agreement, each of which shall be deemed an original on the date first written above. BOARD OF WELD COUNTY COMMISSIONERS y /f &Auk CONTRACTOR BY X /C BY Paramount Construction. Inc. NAME Gene R. Brantner (Please Type) NAME Michael W. Moffitt (Please TITLE Chairman TITLE President Type) Address 363 South Harlan Street, Suite 209 Lakewood, Color o 80226 Michae . M i t (SEAL) Mr% (ATTEST: ATTEST: ` Deputy er cfro t e rioar NAME Donald D. Warden NAME Idoline Fisher (Please Type) (Please Type) TITLE Clerk to the Board TITLE Assistant Secretary 23 ST Cr • PERFORMANCE BOND Bond No. 5082732 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That . PARAMOUNT CONSTRUCTION, INC. Name of Contractor 363 South Harlan Street, Suite 209, Lakewood, Colorado 80226 Address of Contractor a Corporation . hereinafter called Principal. and Corporation, Partnership, or Individual HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY Name of Surety Hartford, Connecticut Address of Surety hereinafter called Surety, are held and firmly bound unto THE BOARD OF WELD COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, 915 10th Street. Greeley, Colorado 80632. hereinafter called County, in the penal sum of TWO HUMMED SIXTY THREE T90QSAND AND ND/100 Dollars in lawful money of the United States, for the payment of which sum well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, successors, and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION is such that whereas, the Principal entered into a certain contract with the County, dated the 15th day of September 1990, a copy of which is attached and made apart hereof for the construction of: Weld County Bridges 78/13A and 80.5/17A, Weld County, Colorado NOW, THEREFORE, if the Principal shall well, truly and faithfully perform its duties, all the undertaking, covenants. terms, conditions, and agreements Of said contract during the original term thereof, and any extensions thereof which may be granted by the County, vith or without notice to the Surety and during the one year guarantee period, and if he shall satisfy all claims and demands incurred under such contract. and shall fully indemnify and save harmless the County from all costs and damages which it may suffer by reason of failure to do co, and shall reimburse end repay the County all outlay and expense which the County may incur in making good any default, then this obligation shall be void; otherwise to remain in full force and effect. 24 QC C-c4 3 PROVIDED. FURTHER, that the said Surety. for value received hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the contract or to work to be performed thereunder or the specifications accompanying the same shall in any ways affect its obligation on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time. alteration or addition to the terms of the contract of the work or to the specifications. PROVIDED. FURTHER. that no final settlement between the County and the contractor shall abridge the right of any beneficiary hereunder, whose claim may be unsatisfied. triplicate IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument is executed in this 15th day of September . 19 90 . ATTEST: PARAMOUNT CONSTRUCT (� Princip By: �C� k6b. \vs� S) Principal Secretary By Idoline Fisher, Assistant Secretary el W. Moffitt, es' t (SEAL) ' 363 South Harlan Street, a 209 Not Applicable Lakewood. Colorado 6022§ Witness as to Principal Address Address ATTEST: Not Applicable HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY Surety Secretary (SEAL) G Dv: ..1414.i 09eLe¢ 0-C) BY (2.1.01- 'Fitness as t4/Surety Attorney- -Fact Celeste re Shelley Cox P.O. Box 9364 Address Address Denver, Colorado Denver, Colorado 80209 NOTE: Date of bond must not bee prior to date of contract. If contractor is a partnership, all partners should execute bond. IMPORTANT: Surety companies executing bonds must appear on the Treasury Department's most current list (circular 570 as amended) and be authorized to transact business in the state where she �� project is located. 25 � the Talbert corporation r,,7ru d Fire Insurance Company ® . SURETY BONDS AND INSURANCE /A,.,,.0. Sox 37EC8C Denver, CO 80237 PO BOX 9964, DENVER, CO 60209 AREA LODE 303 / 879.1773 PAYMENT BONA • Bond No. 5082732 KNOW ALL HEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That PARAMOUNT CONSTRUCTION, INC. _ Name of Contractor 363 South Harlan Street, Suite 209, Lakewood, Colorado 80226 Address of Contractor a Corporation hereinafter called Principal, and Corporation, Partnership or Individual HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Hartford, CODD.egtialt Name o£ Surety hereinafter called Surety, are held and firmly bound unto THE BOARD OF WELD COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado 80632,* o£ Septmeber , 1990, a copy of which is hereto attached and made a part hereof for the construction of: Weld County Bridges 78/13A and 80.5/17A, Weld County, Colorado NOW. THEREFORE, if the Principal shall during the entire length of said contract and any extension thereof promptly make payment to all persons, firms, subcontractors, and corporation furnishing materials for or performing labor in the prosecution of the work provided for in such contract, and any authorized extension or modification thereof, including all amounts due for materials, lubricants, oil, gasoline, coal and coke. repairs on machinery, equipment and tools. consumed or used in connection with the construction of such work, and all insurance premiums on said work, and for all labor, performed in such work whether subcontractor or otherwise, then this obligation shall be void; otherwise to remain full force and effect. • PROVIDED, FURTHER. that the said Surety, for value received hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the contract or to the work to be performed thereunder or the specifications accompanying the same shall in any way affect its obligation on time, alteration or addition to the terms of the contract or to the work or to the specifications. PROVIDED, FURTHER, that a fine] settlement between the County and thr contractor shall abridge the right of any beneficiary hereunder, whose claim may be unsatisfied. *hereinafter called County, in the penal sum of TWO BUMPED SIXTY THREE TBOOSAND AND NO/100 Dollars ($263,000.00) in lawful money of the United States, for the payment of which sum well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, successors, and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION is such that whereas, the Principal entered into a certain contract with. the County, dated the 15th day 26 Q n. is veil_9 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument is executed in three (3) (number) counterparts, each one of which shall be deemed an original. this the 15th day of September _, 1990. pARAM0INT CCNSTRUCD CN Prine al ATTEST: BY S) gy: k.k6a- Mi el W. Mo fit , t Principal SeCretary Idoline Fisher, Assistant Secretary (SEAL) Not Applicable 36.3 South Harlan Street, Suite 209 Witness as to principal Address Lakewood, Colorado 80226 Address HARTFORD FIRE IN&S1IZANCE COMea,IV Surety 7C8 y�B t S BYalfirt� / �("�7Le W%L:,esS as to urety ACeiest Moorect Shelley COx _ P.O. Box 9364 Address Address Denver, Colorado Denver, Colorado 80209 NOTE: Date of bond must not be prior to date of contract. If contractor is a partnership, all partners should execute bond. IMPORTANT: Surety companies executing bonds must appear on the Treasury Department's most current list (circular 5)0 as amended) and be authorized to transact business in the state where the project is located. IMM the Talbert corporation Hartford Fire fnsurartcoCompany SURETY BON0% AND INSURANCE ,P. 0. Box 378080 P O BOX 9384. DENVER. CO. 80209 }7CirR/CiY. W ? ® AREA CODE 303/ B39-T773 27 - QCCS4 9 HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY Hewn OrmeMA P01Ne1 OF ATTORNEY 1Cnow ea men by these Pmenb. That the HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporatiOn duly organized under the taws of me State of Connecticut,an0 Meng its principal office in the City Of 343285 Hartford,County Of Hanford,State of Conned*Cut,doss ra s hereby ke,caftan,and appoint B. R. CLARK, CHARLES H. FLECK, COURTNEY T. PETERSON, CAROL BRONDER, P. J. FARMER, ROBERT J. =RICH, LEON B. DARTOIS, JAMES S. ROSULER, raELVIN HARDENBROOK, JR. CELESTE MOORE, J. R. RICHARDS and WILLIAM K. BARBOUR of DENVER, COLORADO its true and Iswfut Attomey(e).in-Fact, with full power and authority to each of said Attontey(sHn•Fact, in their separate Capacity If more tan one is named above, t0 sign, execute and acknowledge any and all bonds and undertakings and other writings obligatory In the nature thereof on behalf of the Company in its business Of Ou ranteelftg the fidelity of persons holding places of publIC Of private trust Ga ntteNng the penormance of contrast's Omer than insurance policies:guaranteeing the performance of insurance contracts where surety bards are accepted by states and municipalities, and executing Or gwrenteeing bands and undertakings required 2f permitted in all aCtiOnS or proceedings or Dy tad allowed, �. and to bind the HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY thereby as fully and to one---------------------------- • if wcn bonds and undertakings and Omer writing*obligatory in the nature thereof were signed by an Executive Officer of the HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY and sealed and attested by one other of such Officers,and hereby ratifies and confines all that its said Attorney(s)-In•Fact may OO In pursuance hereOt. This power of attorney is granted by and under authority of the following previsions: (11 By-Laws adopted by the StoOkho:ders of the HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY at a meeting duly called and held on the 9th day of March,1971. • ARTICLE IV SECTION 6 The Mew°ant a arty VNWwIOsat,rano with try SeraW or Aster Srailanc.INN TIM 00wat and aulhaM Ice aPPOlnr tea•MOWING ONy Of asileidNO and seating banal and unaYlnangs and aM Vented\aMgalby in new.noun Ihsea,ores sir men Prawn Vlr►PrwadFla.Resider Ammar Secretors and AeaawilRlaa an at any erns to relay.any awn RardW Vq►hwidem. Resew Amstar Secretry.or AMrrwylmeaa.erV M i the Mew end ilAMlny ohwa 1011x11. SECTION 11.AllpnlrMMati WTI here pow rind wantonly,nest to 111 tenni and altr abO a Or Ilse parer Of attorney Mug to them.10 axacule and diner On WEN Of Pia COMprly and to attar Ur teal of Ube O rigey Mena any AV as Oaaa as wndaraarnpi and other writings obigan ry n the Myra three.era any such inseumera ease the any such AttMMyin•Patt mall be as berg won iM Company te rl YOMa by an tiOCUOyo oniter acid sled mg SWIM by One other of suet dhKM (2) Excerpt from the Minutes of a meeting of the Board of Directors of the HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY duly Called and Mkt on the 11th day of Jun*.19781 RESOLVED, Robarl N. M Saner.Ala H as Vinw asidaw shall y.ee WO he halo our rake the sam la e ver te any Vu.F und er der Sea o s&7 fordt w 10f Asks IV of the awls.'of Ts Comwr This power of attorney is signed and sealed by facsimile under and by the authority of the following Resolu- tion adopted by the Directors of the HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY at a meeting duly called and held on the BM oily of August 1978. RESOLVED.tat,whereas Roast N.M.Sant,Melrose VbrWeegtet,acting Hanel nary Seeetey or Arrant Saaawry.Iva the paver elf authority.se long tea talda Kai office.to riper by a power of Ialornm.for gums a only of iwMnp as arming eons we uManalo gs and other writings Oraisl0ry in tie Mien Mete 1.pie Or mat Rrmdant VbaHrrlOMla,Assam Saone,ere smarmy mean: reOw,wren to atgnahrrte of wen Wows am the teos of the Co pow err to antra to any still covet a attorney or to any affnlidaN Malin*Metro by tammit ria any NAM OWN Of Illlplw/Of Genders bang stair fiWM*Nratltna Of faCalMils mai WII OS Vela and bfang upen 1M Cpptey as any wen power so exactas°end darned by bows*swea ea and fermilla tea mane tat valid Ina Gtatrlo upon 1a COrlpeny in be future with far eCt teeny tam or Unerring te sta:h e a earned. In Wen Wmreol,the HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY as cawed these presents to be signed by its Assistant Vice-President and Its corporate seal to be hereto affixed,duly attested by its Secretary,min 18th day of March 1980. Attest: HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY /74.011 ea• rM Rpperl J.AYmite Rents N.N.Saw Saorifay MawfrP Vlw.ar..wa STATE OF CONNECTICUT, as. COUNTY OF HARTFORD, On this 18th day of March.A.D. 1908,before me personally name Robert N.H.Senor.t0 me known,who being by me duly sworn,did depose and say that he asides in the County of Hartford,State of Connecticut that he o the Assistant Vice-Presklent of the HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY,the corporation described in and which executed the.$00vs instrument that he knows to seal of said corpOratiOrt that the seal affixed tb the said instrument la SUCK corporate Seel:that it was 50 affixed by order Of the Beard of Directors of sold COrporatlen and that he signed his name thereto by Glee order. STATE OF CONNECTICUT. F CA �j '"' 'y - COUNTYOFHARTFORD, CeR1FICAT! D ..weew'a T Owcalra Notary Poyre W COMISOt°r LOSS Agra 1,IOW f, the undersigned. Assistant Secretary of the HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Conn�.'tgifn�r Corporation,DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing and attached POWER OF ATTORNEY famine In full Rif Vc Q and has not been revoked:end furthermore. that the Resolutions a the Board of Directors,dtors,set forth in the Pow 8-teJ a. Or Attorney,are now In force. Signed and sealed at the City of Hartford. Dated the 15th day or Sep labce A 19 e n s DowdA Johemon Pdnn 0-1107e1 (NFl Poniedin US.A. I:n AatramMossY , Emom E CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE =us Da 4/ rmIACOMD qa PRLDDVC[R THISCERIIFlCATE IS ISSUED ASA MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS The Talbert Corporation No EEXits,RENDOOR�aneC�wEFRAAGEAF�oEDBYTHEPPouaIESBE°ELLow°T�N° 1001 Lincoln P.O. BOX 9364 COMPANIESAFFORDINGCOVERAGE Denver, CO 80209 COMPANY A CODE wawa LETTER U S F & G INSURANCE CO. COMPANY a INSURED 1 LETTER U U S F & G INSURANCE CO. COMPANY` LETTER . Paramount Construction, Inc. U S I & 0 INSURANCE CO, 363 S. Harlan St . , Suite 209 I COMPANY Lakewood CO 80226 LETTER D MARYLAND CASUALTY CO_ DIMIMNY E 1 LETTER COVERAGES THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERioo INDICATED,NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT,TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFIGOTEMAYBE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN,THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POUCIESOESCR18ED HEREIN ISSUBJECTIDALLTHETERMS,EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POUCIES UMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAIDCUUMS LTA TYPE OF INSURANCE PDUCYNUMBER D/,NMDn1'11) POLIO'EFFECTIVE 1 POLICY .YI ALL UM-MIN THOUSANDS ' AB em.LJawry s• 1MP127042674 8/02/90 8/02/9'amass s 2000 'LX COMMERCIAL GENERAL UABIUTY PRDOUCTSCOMROPSAGOPEOME S 2000 -GAMMA= X ]OCCLYI. PERSONALAAMERMAN°INAMY $ 1 000 ' OWNER'S&CONTRACTORSPROT. EACHOSOPRENCE $ 1000 _ FIRE DNAMJE WI opts M) S 50 I MEDIAL o7ETIBE(NHdtsPb) E 5 ?AUTOMOBILE UABILITY 1AB300073224 I 8/02/9(18/02/91y s - '1 X ANY AUTO IIIMIr 1001 -AU.OWNED AUTOS � S SCHEDULED AUTOS (Pa OVICA) PLAINT $ X NDNOWNED AUTOS ow soddRm GARAGE LAINLDY PROPERTY DAMAGE s C`�aLLAtuLI^' 1MP127042674 8/02/90 8/02/9 r*r3n X, UMBRELLA FORM s 2000 $ 2000 OMERWM UMBREUAFORM • E **gamscoLnwsmtpi I BINDER I 8/02/90 8/02/9 1OR' s �0 0 m.ww.sxmom AND s 500lCEABE- IBJPLOTERS'WIWTY IBPOUL,YLBJrrJ . $ - 500WeEAOE-rnwErLwBE! Min 1 DEICRIPTIONOPOPERATIONSILOCTSesTibCTIONSASPECTALN s WELD COUNTY BRIDGES 78/13A AND 80.5/17A, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO "ADDITIONAL INSUREDz THE BOARD OF WELD COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 4.A:0as3 CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR TO THE BOARD OF WELD COUNTY MaL 30 nAYS WRmEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER sINAEDTOTHE COMMISSIONERS LEFT, BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SMALL IMPOSE NO OBLIOATION OR 915 10TH STREET wain OF ANY KIND U-. THE COMPANY,(TSAGENTS OR NDITNFS TG DAY GREELEY, COLORADO 80632 NOTICE WILL BE G�-NONPAYMENT OF PREMIUM. / AUTNonaE) //J • ■i INSURANCE BINDER ISSUE DATE(MWOONI'Y) 9/11/DO THIS BINDER IS A TEMPORARY INSURANCE CONTRACT,SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS SHOWN ON THE HEVERSE SIDE OF THIS FORM. PRODUCER COMPANY BINDER NO. CRUM & F9pg. E' COMM'L BIND) 2{9606 The Talbert Corporation DATE E E LYE nNE DATE EJUMM ON MIE 1001 Lincoln 12 0 LMP '+ rX inn AM P.O. BOX 9364 9/13/90 r PMj 12/13/90 t NMN Denver, CO 80209 i THIS BINDER 15 ISSUED TO EXTEND COVERAGE IN THE ABOVE NAMED COMPANY PER EXPIRING POLICY NO.: com 0539902 SUS-CODE DESCRIPTION CO CPERATICNSNENICLESPROPERTY BNCLUDING LOCATION) INSURED BRIDGE BUILDER'S RISK POLICY Paramount Construction, Inc. COVERING WELD COUNTY BRIDGES 78/13A & Board of Weld County Comm. AND 80.5/17A, WELD COUNTY, CO 363 S. Harlan St . , Suite 209 (3263,000) Lakewood CO 80226 COVERAGES ALL LIAHRUTY LIMITS IN THOMISM a TYPE OF INSURANCE COVERAGESTORMS MOUNT corm COINSURMCE PROPERTY CAUSES OF LOSS BASIC nBRDAD FISPECIAI GENERAL uASILIrY mHERAL AISMATE s �C0MMEROAL GENERAL LIABILITY NW1LTSmMPOli AMMAR S 10.^*WOE OXVIPOIX POISCIMI.A=EATS=NMSN S OWNER'S d CONTRACT GOI cram IOTA S PROTECTNE ME SWAGE PAY CIE MID S RETRO DATE FOR CLAIMS MADE: SOCK EOM MIT DNE REM= S AUTOMOBILE ,JALL VEHICLES ( i SCHEDULED VEHICLES Ca S LIABILITY s PEAsitc00 $ — NOISOME° PD 6 HIRED BEM PAY s •—ss WAAGEAP s "'" w i AUTO PHYSICAL DAMAGE ..i ALL VEHICLES u SCHEDULED VEHICLES AV DOWNS OED: sun°AmOuNT s OTC OED: r ORO EXCESS LUB1UTY oCcu{AI u+n AoaIAa1E R.d 7 UMBRELLA FORM OTHER THAN UMBRELLA CORM METRO DATE FOR CLAIMS MADE: STATUTORY ( WORKER'S COMPENSATION S VCR IACOENTI AND EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY v S IWSEASGPOUCT or S MUSFFACM MINIMD SPECIAL CONDOIONS/RESTRICTIONS/OTHER COVERAGES "ALL RISK" BRIDGE BUILDERS RISK POLICY W/S1,000 DEDUCTIBLE ALL PERILS EXCEPT EARTHQUAKE ($25,000 DEDUCTIBLE) AND FLOOD (950,000 DEDUCTIBLE) NAME a ADDRESS MORTGAGEE PfAfgaNANSVRED LOSS PAYEE .LOANE AUTHORIZED D.REP EfiENTATIVE yye ACORDTSS(11/851 2_ 48 tIIWACORDCORPORATTON 1965 • , eons:opus :I •1'MMO0 RST2a0'3 a MUSD not.'s7oolo0 neClsT Geri X 10 Si n1oontl 1901 o2\E1\? Pd£F XOa .0.4 ?9598 07 ,7ovn9C Y^.II0c Xe.I9 2`sactI.IUa 3JCInE AS1\8C 230CIStQ YTM000 C13W ODII336'U'0 . onI ,CIO a'Din 78ra7 Jnuoms7,s4 OD ,YTMU00 C13W ,acl\2 .08 GMA .mmo0 y nuo0 b_sW '3o b_so8 3 (000 ,EDS3 ) 20`; o.il r2 , . J2 ns1,5H .2 £a£ ?S20£ 00 `_oows (U.: I CONOii ONS .l A' ^, . OC;.VI`. .h ^.C' ^. V -,(_ ,;3CC . ;C� "?V 111• - W'Qh'hn co Cy - ,. -. z. -Ind., LC:L, W „ f,- ,• n,. Jy , ., nlI n , IL'(Y a ;10..C 4. Ill. C 4,"•ev V-h .nt ., .. - A.QPLICASLE IN NEVADA - ?Pr^.^.n who •,i+uses to accept a binder which provides coverage of Ie:+s than •,-,000,CO3.07, when proo,' is recared: (A) Shali be fined not morn than S500.00, and (3) ab4 :a c a y presenting the binder as proof'of insurance for actual damages sus- 3,1. .O,:: ::::1Jda onL Calc34 11A 31HITOU0aG 000 , 10\W YOII0c1 Ma I2 233C.IIUa 23CIRS "X8IE :SA" (31a2TOUC3C 000 ,0241 C0019 CLIA (3.ISITOUCSO 000 , 2S2) 3NAWOHTaA3 T430X3 • . .ti as -S NOTICE TO PROCEED • •T0: Paramount Construction, Inc. DATE: September 28. 1990 363 S. Harlan St. , Suite 209 PROJECT: • Lakewood, CO 80226 Construction of Weld County Bridge - 78/I3A " You are hereby notified to commence work in accordance with the Agreement dated September 5 , 19 90 , on or before October 8 ,19 90 and you are to complete the work within ninety ( 90 ) consecutive calendar days thereafter. The date of completion of all work is therefore, January 7 , 19 91 THE BOAR D OF WELD COUNTY COMMISSIONERS (Count BY 7 Title Civil Engineer II ACCEPTANCE OF NOTICE Receipt of the above Notice to Proceed is hereby acknowledged by Paramount Construction, Inc. 363 S. Harlan St. , Suite 209, Lakewood, CO 80226 this the 1st day of October 1990 SC OSI 9 By Michael W. Moffitt Title President _ :B NOTICE TO PROCEED ID: Paramount Construction, Inc. DATE: September 28, 1990 363 S. Harlan St. . Suite 209 PROJECT: Lakewood, CO 80226 Construction of Weld County Bridge . 80.5/17A You are hereby notified to commence work in accordance with the Agreement dated $eptember 5 , 19 90 , on or before October 8 ,19 90, and you are to complete the work within ninety ( 90 ) consecutive calendar days thereafter. The date of completion of all work is therefore, Janaury 7 , 19 91 THE BOARD OF WELD COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ` BY Co ty Title Civil Engineer II ACCEPTANCE OF NOTICE Receipt of the above Notice to Proceed is hereby acknowledged by Paramount Construction, Inc. 363 S. Harlan St. , Suite 209. Lakewood, CO 80226 this the 1st day of October , 19 90 n Chael ! v Q : S4 By Michael W. Moffitt C©ry�,� TitlePresident 28 felt MEMORA(IDUM Wire Gene R. Brantner, Chairman To_Rnard of founty CommiSSioners Dee Member 5, 1041 COLORADO From Walter .1 Speckman_ Fxerutive flirertor Human Resources submt lease Agreement between the Family Educational Network of yleld County and the House of Neighborly Service Enclosed for Board approval is a Lease Agreement between the Weld County Division of Human Resources' Family Educational Network of Weld County's (FENWC) Head Start Preschool Program and the House of Neighborly Service. FENWC is using 4 rooms at the Heritage Plaza Building in Brighton, Colorado for the Head Start Preschool Program. The rent is $700.00 per month for the period July 5, 1990 through October 5, 1990. If you have any questions, please telephone Terre Keller at 356-0600. September 5, 1990 MEMORANDUM T0: Clerk to the Board �y FR: Jane Orton �ye�'__ RE: Lease Agreement be en the Family Educational Network of Weld County and the House of Neighborly Service Enclosed for Board approval are three (3) copies of a Lease Agreement as stated above. • Please return two (2) copies once they have been signed. If you have any questions, please telephone Terre Keller at 356-0600. • 9oog:4 LEASE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 5th day of July. 1990, by and between the House of Neighborly Service. hereinafter referred to as "Lessor." and the Weld County Division of Human Resources' Family Educational Network of Weld County. hereinafter referred to as "Lessee." WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Lessor owns the premises located in the City of Brighton. County of Adams, in the State of Colorado. to wit: Heritage Plaza Building. 830 Bridge Street. Brighton. Colorado. 80601. Room Numbers 100. 104. 105 and 107 on the first floor, and WHEREAS. the Lessor desires to lease a certain portion of said building, and WHEREAS, the Lessee desires to lease this portion of the aforementioned premises for use in the Migrant Head Start Program. NOW THEREFORE. in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. The Lessee shall have access to the area described above and agreed to by the Lessor. 2. The rent for said premises shall be in the amount of $700.00 per month. covering the period of July 5. 1990 through October 5. 1990, or for as long as eligible children remain in the area. not t0 exceed $2.000.00. Rental payments are due to the Lessor on the fifth day of each and every month of the term hereof. Rental payments required under this Agreement shall be paid to the Lessor at House of Neighborly Service. 830 Bridge Street. Brighton. Colorado. 80601. 3. A security deposit in the amount of $700.00 shall become part of this Agreement. The security deposit shall be retained to cover any damages to the premises other than normal wear and tear, with the balance to be returned to the Lessee within 30 days, in accordance with Colorado law, provided the Lessee has not violated any provision of this Agreement. The term "normal wear and tear" means that deterioration which occurs, based upon the use for which the rental unit is intended, without negligence, carelessness, accidents. or abuse of the premises or equipment or chattels by the Lessee or others. 4. The Lessee shall not sublet the premises or any part thereof and shall not assign, transfer, pledge, mortgage, or otherwise encumber this Agreement or any portion of the terms thereof. without the previous written consent in each instance of Lessor, and Lessee shall furnish to the Lessor a copy of such proposed instrument. 5. Lessor shall maintain fire insurance and extended coverage on the premises. Lessee agrees to maintain liability insurance. 900814 6. Lessor shall keep the roof and exterior walls in repair. Lessee agrees to keep said facilities in as good repair as found when occupied. The Lessee agrees to pay for all damage caused by the Lessee not considered to be ordinary wear and tear. 7. Lessee agrees to contract in its own name and pay for all charges for water. sewer, gas. electricity. telephone. and other utilities serving the premises during the term of this Agreement. 8. The term of this Agreement shall be from July 5. 1990 through October 5. 1990. 9. This Agreement may be terminated upon thirty (30) days written notice to either party. This Agreement will be terminated immediately upon the loss of funding or lack of eligible • participants to the Migrant Head Start Program. IN WITNESS WHEREOF. the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed as of the day and year first hereinabove set forth. LESSEE: LESSOR: WELD U TY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS HOUSE OF NEIGHBORLY frranter.jal'al �i�nen C airman WELD COUNTY DIVISION OF HUMAN RESOURCES Walter . Spec man Execu ive Director ATTEST: Weld County Clerk o the Board By J ii'fnakti Deputy C1 rk to the Board MOS1.G[ Atli% MEMORAilDUM Wi`lie Gene R. Brantner, Chairman 1Ta Board of County Commissioners 0,, September 5, 1990 COLD ,Anp From Walter J. Speckman, Executive Director, Human Resources ?/�R� s vw,:Leas�e A reeeement between the Family Educational Network of Weld County and the Trinity °Fusing Zrorpora ion Enclosed for Board approval is a Lease Agreement between the Weld County Division of Human Resources' Family Educational Network of Weld County's (FENWC) Head Start Preschool Program and the Trinity Housing Corporation. FENWC will be leasing one room at the Island Grove Apartments in Greeley, Colorado to use in the Head Start Preschool Program. The rent for the room will be $150.00 per month for the period October 1, 1990 through May 31, 1991. If you have any questions, please telephone Terre Keller at 356-0600. I September 5, 1990 MEMORANDUM T0: Clerk to the Boar FR: Jane Orton RE: Lease Agreement n the Family Educational Network of Weld County and the Trinity Housing Corporation Enclosed for Board approval are three (3) copies of a Lease Agreement as stated above. Please return two (2) copies once they have been signed. If you have any questions, please telephone Terre Keller at 356-0600. 900815 HE.00<13 LEASE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 5th day of September , 1990, by and between the Weld County Division of—RaiF Resources' Family Educational Network of Weld County's Head Start Preschool Program, Weld County Government, hereinafter referred to as "lessee," and the Trinity Housing Corporation of Greeley, hereinafter referred to as the "Lessor." WITNESSETH WHEREAS, the lessor owns the building known as Island Grove Apartments, located at 119 14th Avenue, Greeley, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Lessor desires to lease one room of said building to the Lessee for use in the Head Start Preschool Program. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. The Lessee shall have access to the area described above and agreed to by the Lessor, between the hours of 7:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and on occasional evenings. Lessee will provide to the Lessor a one (1) week advance notice of any needed occasional evening usage. 2. Rent for said building space shall be in the amount of $150.00 per month, payable the 1st of every month. This amount covers the cost of rent and utilities. 3. The Lessee will provide the costs for the Lessee's telephone installation and service. 4. The Lessee shall provide janitorial services for the aforementioned building space. 5. The Lessee agrees to keep said building space in as good repair as it was found upon being occupied by the Lessee. Lessee agrees to pay for all damage caused by the Lessee not considered to be ordinary wear and tear. 6. The Lessor shall be responsible for all repairs necessary to the exterior and interior of the building, including, but not limited to, any repairs to sewers, heating units, appliances, wiring, plumbing facilities, doors, windows, door locks, etc. , unless caused by negligence on the part of the lessee. 7. The Lessor shall provide trash removal service. 8. The term of this Agreement shall be from October 1, 1990 through May 31, 1991. 9. The Lessee agrees to maintain liability insurance and provide Lessor with proof of insurance certificate. 10. Lessor will not be held liable for any loss of or damage to Lessee's furniture or equipment placed on the premises. 9€0815 11. This Agreement, may be amended or terminated upon thirty (30) days written notice to either party. This Agreement will be terminated immediately upon the loss of funding to the Head Start Preschool Program. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Lease Agreement on the day, month, and year first above written. LESSEE: LESSOR: WELD COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS TRINITY H SING CORPORATION OF GREELEY � �ne rantner, C airman Thomas E. Cole, EJcik-t-------- WELD COUNTY DIVISION OF HUMAN ATTEST: LillideuetRESOURCES Weld County Clerkto the Board By. Deputy C�irk to the Boar Wa t . Speckman Executive Director ^0091,5 frig MEMORA11DUM Z, 11111k Gene R. Counter, Chairman T, Beard of County CQmmiatoners o,,. SPn#Pmber 5. 1990 COLORADO F,..Walter J. Speckman, Executive Directors Human Resources !(/ 40- so).“.Board approval of the 1990 Weld County Family Educational Network Child Care Food Program Grant Application Enclosed for Board approval is the 1990 Weld County Family Educational Network Child Care Food Program Grant Application. This grant is between the Colorado Department of Health's Child Care Food Program and the Weld County Division of Human Resources's Family Educational Network of Weld County (FENWC). This grant allows for the reimbursement to FENWC for meals served to Head Start and Migrant Head Start Children. It also sets the income guidelines by which the FENWC Program must adhere in free or reduced- priced meals to participants in the program. This contractual arrange- ment has been in effect since September, 1980. The terms of this grant are from October 1, 1990 through September 30, 1991. If you have any questions, please telephone Tere Keller at 356-0600. September 5, 1990 MEMORANDUM T0: Clerk to the go rd FR: Jane Orton / RE: Board appro dr of the 1990 Weld County Family Educational Network Child Care Food Program Grant Application Enclosed for Board approval are between one (1) and three (3) originals comprising the 1990 Weld County Family Educational Network Child Care Food Program Grant Application. Please return all originals and all copies (minus the one copy for:your files) once they have been signed. If you have any questions, please telephone Tere Keller at ?56-0600. W � /� 900816 ie COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CHILD AND ADULT CARE FOOD AGREEMENT NUMBER PROGRAM APPLICATION FOR CHILD CARE CENTER 65103-005 INSTRUCTIONS: Complete in duplicate.If a sponsored facility,the onpinal(and required attachments)must be submitted with CACFP 302 (Application for Sponsor of Child and Adult Care Centers). Type or print clearly. I. NAME ANC!ADORESS OF CENTER(FEEDING LOCATION) d DO YOU CARE FOR CHILDREN IN SHIFTS? TESL NO...— Island Grove Village Apartments 119 14th Avenue Shift Care means that children are amino and going at ail tines of the day so that the total number of children attending the center on a dally G r elN F1 e@mo e� CQ i 0 ��0) 8� '12627 blab may escii0 the acne oao.att TO.: COUNTY:_ weld O. HOURS OF OPERATION PROM 8:00 a.m. TD 5:00 p.m. 2. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON RESPONSIBLE AT CENTER 1GNUMBER OF OPERATING 11,NUMBER OF OPERATING to be determined DAYS PER WEE" 5 WEEKS PER YEAR 34 3. TYPE OF FACILITY 12, ANNUAL DATES OF OPERATION —NONPROFIT CHILD CARE CENTER �.OUTSIDl3CNOOL•NOURS CENTER STARTING_ Oct. 1, 1990 EN0tN0May .31 r 1990 —FORgre PROFIT TITLAddend" )CX CENTER(Moat also suDrtaf ld LIST ANY MONTHS DURING WHICH Y00 WILL NOT CLAIM MEALS Agreement ST Addendum) ANO SNACKS FOR REIMBURSEMENT(Include data or closing and �,•(^HEAD START PROGRAM reOpenimp} MIGRANT HEAD START PROGRAM NUMBER OF HEAD START CLASSROOMS: AM— PMT NUMBER OF CHILDREN IN EACH CLASSROOM_ 10. 00 YOU NOW PARTICIPATE IN OR HAVE YOU PARTICIPATED ter FEDERALLY-FUNDED PROGRAMS(INCLUDING CACFP AND it. IS CENTER LICENSED OR APPROVED BY FEDERAL OR STATE NATIONAL SCHOOL LUNCH PROGRAM) IN THE PAST THREE AUTHORITY? YES_ NOS(. YEARS? Y&!-,Y,— NO EXPIRATION OATS_ NIA Heart Start • or"YES-fee name 01 Program(s)and dates Of participation) LICENSE CAPACITY CACFP 5780 to present Is your Head Start site licensed as a child care center by the Coktrado Department of Social Services during times when Head Start Is not in session? YES_ NO-X. 5. AGE RANGE OF ENROLLED CHILDREN 16. DO YOU PARTICIPATE IN THE COLORADO PRESCHOOL PROM 4 TO 5 PROJECT? YES. NO..— 6. oo YOU CARE FOR iNFANTS FROM BIRTH THROUGH YES NO MONTHS?CARE FOR INFANTS FROM BIRTH THROUGH YES NO 1Q IS THIS A PRIVATE ORGANIZATION? ('PAIVATE'means ntergowmtMntap YES_ NO.6_ WILL YOU CLAIM THESE INFANTS ON THE CACFP? _ 4. 17. IS CENTER SPONSORED? YES NO... If"YES,'give name of eponaor(Sponsor must submit CACFP 302). 7. t>o YOU CARE FOR SPECIAL NEEDS CHILDREN/ YEt1 NO Weld County Department of Human Resources INFANTS ON A REGULAR BASIS? P.O. Box 1805 WILL U CLAIM THESE CHILDREN/INFANTS ON THE - CACFP? Greeley, Colorado 80632 19. IS THIS A PRICING OR NONPRICING PROGRAM?(Check one) —MIMING(Pleas content our office for further Instruction 331.6331) _r.NONPRICINO In a pricing Anomie centers establish a charge separate Mom tuition for weals in order to make up the alderman betee m the relmbumement provided by the CACFP and fM Ionic,cosr o/serving the male in a nonohe)ng program,familla pave tenets/tuition ohne that covers ace erase of child care services provided by tits center.including meals.Than Is no identifiable separate charge for meals served to any deldnen in care. All participating centers or aponsoro are eligible TO receive advance payments.AdvarlCea are reduested monthly by filling Out an advents form.The amount of advents money shall not eMceeO a Iypltal month's rats of reimbursement and shell be deducted from that monm'e claim for reimbursement. t9. CIVIL RIGHTS PLEASE NOTE: If you ars a single,independent center,complete MO Praward Compliance Review rather than this section. PROVIDE AN arrant OF THE RACIAL/ETHNIC MAKEUP OF THE CHILDREN TO BE SERVED FROM SOURCES SUCH AS CENSUS TRACT DATA, PUBLIC SCHOOL DATA, HOUSING AUTHORITY DATq ETC. IN ADDITION, GIVE THE ACTUAL RACIAL/ETHNIC BREAKDOWN OF YOUR CURRENT ENROLLMENT. ESTIMATE ACTUAL M smer)Indian of Alaskan NatlVe 4 Asian or Pacific Islander -6-__ Black(not of Hispanic Origin) 5 x Hispanic 1] vUJlJ White(not 01 Hispanic origin) $1 _ CACFP•301 (5/90) i AM PM 2O. MEAL SERVED I BREAKFAST SNACK LUNCH. SNACK SUPPER TIME OF MEAL SERVICE(S) �nn s•en 11.30 NUMBER OF MEALS EXPECTED TO BE SERVED I TR 16 JS METHOD BY WHICH MEALS WILL BE PROVIDED: i • PREPARATION AT MEAL SERVICE LOCATION ARE MEAL PRODUCTION RECORDS BEING KEPT FOR EACH MEAL? X PREPARATION AT CENTRAL KITCHEN YES.X NO- _UNDER CONTRACT WITH LOCAL SCHOOL SYSTEM (SUBMIT COPY OF CONTRACT) ARE RECORD OF MEALS SERVED FORMS BEING KEPT FOR EACH —UNDER CONTRACT WITH FOOD SERVICE CATERER MEAL', YES". NO_ (SUBMIT COPY OF CONTRACT) FOOD SERVICE STAFF PATTERN(Enter Only personnel wno will perform Child and Adult Care Food Program rood agvlCe functions In tnla center.) SPECIFIC CACFP FOOD NUMBER OF YEARS NAME OF POSITION NAME OF PERSON SERVICE DUTIES STAFF IN IN THIS THIS POSITION POSITION Teacher to be determined help tervP fond, rmsparo ttiso t 1 Teacher-aide . to be determined help serve food: 21-Pnarr snacks 1 ' ._ . • Bus driver , transport food I • • • • 21„(CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION ON IMES'APPLICATION IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE:THAT I WILL ACCEPT FINAL ADMINISTRA- TIVE AND FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR TOTAL CHILD d ADULT CARE FOOD PROGRAM OPERATIONS AT THIS CENTER IF NOT UNDER A SPONSOR,THAT REIMBURSEMENT WILL BE OLAIMED ONLY FOR MEALS SERVED TO ENROLLED CHILDREN:THAT DEPARTMENT OFFICIALS MAY VERIFY!NFORMATION,AND THAT DELIBERATE MISREPRESENTATION MAY SUBJECT ME TO PROSECUTION UNDER APPLICABLE STATE AND CRIMINAL STATUTES,AND THAT THE CACFP WILL BE AVAILABLE TO ALL ELIGIBLE CHILDREN REGARDLESS OF RACE COLOR,NATIONAL ORIGIN,SEX HANDICAP,OR AGE I UNDERSTAND THAT THIS INFORMATION IS BEING GIVEN IN CONNECTIO ITH THE REC IPT OFF DERALFUNOS,AND THAT A DELIBERATE MISRE RESENTATION MAY SUBJECT ME TO PROSECUTION UNDER AP BL SATE N F` RIMINAL STATUTE& �r ATTEST: Y\ /i'be ere.74c/- W ou t lerk to Board September 5, 1990 SIGNATURE OF ADMINISTRATOR OR AUTHOR' ED REPRESENTATIVE DATE • • Deputy clerk to Boa: COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CHILD AND ADULT CARE FOOD AGREEMENT NUMBER PROGRAM 65103-005 APPLICATION FOR CHILD CARE CENTER INSTRUCTIONS: Complete in duplicate.If a sponsored facility,the original(and required attachments)must be submitted with CACFP 302 CADDOCatk in for Sponsor of Child and Adult Care Centers). Type or print clearly, 1. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CENTER (FEEDING LOCATION) 0. OO YOU CARE FOR CHILDREN 1N SHIFTS? YES X_ No_ Milliken Head Start Shoe can means that children an caning and gang at all times of the 300 Poroad Street g daysomm the tow number of children attending the center on a dally Milliken, Colorado $0543403 basin may exceed the llCense caftecity. TELEPHONE NO.: COUNTY: Weld 9. HOURS OF OPERATION FROM TO 2. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON RESPONSIBLE AT CENTER 8:00 a.m. 5:00 p.m. 1QNUMBER OF OPERATING 7t.NUMBER OF OPERATING Mabel Tapia, Teacher DAYS PER WEEK 4 WEEK$ PER YEAR 32 3, TYPE OF FACILITY 12. ANNUAL DATES OF OPERATION —NONPROFIT CHILD CARE CENTER OCt. 1, 1990 May 31, 1990 -OUTSIDE•SCHOOL•HOURS CENTER STARTING ENDING _ FOR PROFIT TITLE XX CENTER(Must also submit • 13. UST ANY MONTHS DURING WHICH YOU WILL NOT CLAIM MEALS Agreement Addendum) AND SNACKS FOR REIMSURSEMENT(Include dates of closing and MEAD START PROGRAM re0penm0). -MIGRANT HEAD START PROGRAM NUMBER OF HEAD START CLASSROOMS: AM_ PM— NUMBER OF CHILDREN IN EACH CLASSROOM ^ 14. 00 YOU NOW PARTICIPATE IN OR HAVE YOU PARTICIPATED IN FEDERALLY•FUNDED PROGRAMS(INCLUDING CACFP ANO 4, IS CENTER LICENSED OR APPROVED BY FEDERAL OR STATE NATIONAL SCHOOL LUNCH PROGRAM) IN THE PAST THREE AUTHORITY? YES_ NO_& YEARS? YES— NO Of'YEE.'give name of Progremfa)and dates of participation) EXPIRATION DATE N1_A Head Start LICENSE CAPACITY • CACFP 5/80 to present Is your Head Start sits licensed as ■ child Care Center by the Colorado Department of Social Services during times When Head Start is not in session? YES_ NOEL 5. AGE RANGE OF ENROLLED CHILDREN 15. DO YOU PARTICIPATE IN THE COLORADO PRESCHOOL . FROM 4 TO 5 PROJECT? YES.2- NO_ 0. DO YOU CARE FOR INFANTS FROM BIRTH THROUGH YES NO 10. IS TM$A PRIVATE ORGANIZATION? A t2 MONTHS? PPRrvAYE'moans nngovemmentab YES_ NO WILL YOU CLAIM THESE INFANTS ON THE CACFP? _ _ 17. IS CENTER SPONSORED? YES JL NO— , if WE$,'give tame of*soma Moons°,must submit CACFP 302), 7. DO YOU CARE FOR SPECIAL NEEDS CHILDREN/ YES NO Weld County Department of Human Resources INFANTS ON A REGULAR BASIS? — — P.O. BOX 1805 wR.t. Y U CLAIM THESE CHILDREN/INFANTS ON THE — —CACFP? Greeley, Colorado 80632 1a. IS THIS A PRICING OR NONPRICING PROGRAM?(Check One) _PRICING(Pease cont■pt our Miles few further Instruction 331.0351) NONPRICING In a pricing program,centers establish a charge separate from tuition form at:On order to make up the difletenee between We ro/mbursemantprorlded by the CACFP and the actual Cost 0I Salting the meals. In a non:maim program,families pay a general tuition Cheige that corers aileron or child care services provided Dr the center,including meals There IS n0 identillable separate charge IOr Meals serVed t0 any children/n taro. All participating centers or sponsors MO eligible t0 receive advance payments,Advances an ingested mOnthly fyy f111111g put an advance form.The amount Of advance Money shall not exceed a typical month's rate of reimbursement and snail be deducted from that monm'a claim fir reimbursement. 19. CIVIL RIGHTS PLEASE NOTE: It you are a single,independent center,complete the°leeward Compliance Review rather than this section. PROVIDE AN ESTIMATE OF THE RACIAL/ETHNIC MAKEUP OF THE CHILDREN TO BE SERVED FROM SOUROES SUGH AS CENSUS TRACT DATA PUBLIC SCHOOL DATA. HOUSING AUTHORITY DATA, ETC IN ADDITION, GIVE THE ACTUAL RACIAL/ETHNIC BREAKDOWN OF YOUR CURRENT ENROLLMENT, ESTIMATE ACTUAL American Indian or Alaskan Native �- Allan or Pacific Islander Black(not o1 Hispanic Origin) Hlape(n 30% D�''O8 6 White(not of Hispanic origin) V�.L CACFP•301 (5/90) AM PM 20. MEAL SERVED BREAKFAST SNACK LUNCH SNACK SUPPER TIME OF MEAL SERVICE(S) 8.30 11:30 2:00 ' NUMBER OF MEALS EXPECTED TO BE SERVED 18 36 18 METHOD BY WHICH MEALS WILL BE PROVIDED: _PREPARATION AT MEAL SERVICE LOCATION ARE MEAL PRODUCTION RECORDS BEING KEPT FOR EACH MEAL? _PREPARATION AT CENTRAL KITCHEN YES- NO- UNDER CONTRACT WITH LOCAL SCHOOL SYSTEM (SUBMIT COW OF CONTRACT) ARE RECORD OF MEALS SERVED FORMS BEING KEPT FOR EACH UNDER CONTRACT WITH FOOD SERVICE CATERER mEgL? YE$� NO (SUBMIT COW OF CONTRACT) FOOD SERVICE STAFF PATTERN(Enter only personnel who well perform Child and Adult Care Food Program lood service,/unctions in Una comer.) NUMBERYEARS NAME OF POSITION NAME OF PERSON SPECIFIC CACFP FOOD ST F F IN IN THIS SERVICE DUTIES THIS POSITION POSITION Teachep Mabel Tapia ,prepares snack,'.help children _ 1 16 TPache'r-aide tO be determined prepares snack, help children 1 Cook contracted out prepares snack, help children 21. I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION ON THIS APPLICATION IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOW LEDGE THAT I WILL ACCEPT FINAL ADMINISTRA- TIVE AND FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR TOTAL CH ILO 8 ADULT CARE FOOD PROGRAM OPERATIONS AT THIS CENTER IF NOT UNDER A SPONSOR,THAT REIMBURSEMENT WILL BE CLAIMED ONLY FOR MEALS SERVED TO ENROLLED CHILDREN,THAT DEPARTMENT OFFICIALS MAY VERIFY INFORMATION:AND THAT DELIBERATE MISREPRESENTATION MAY SUBJECT ME TO PROSECUTION UNDER APPLICABLE STATE AND CRIMINAL STATUTES,AND THAT THE CACFP WILL BE AVAILABLE TO ALL ELIGIBLE CHILDREN REGARDLESS OF RACE,COLOR,NATIONAL ORIGIN,SEX HANDICAP,OR AGE. I U NDERSTAND THAT THIS INFORMATION IS BEING GIVEN IN CON NECTIO ITH THE REC PT OO�jFEF DERAL FUNDS.AND THAT A DELIBERATE MIISRREEP/ ON ESSEENNTAATTION MAY SUBJECT ME TO PROSECUTION UNDER AP ABL A/TE//jN✓ RAL RIMINAL STATUTES. ESe d County Clerk to Board _Septrrmhcr 5. 1990 SIGNATURE OF ADMINISTRATOR OR AUTHORI REPRESENTATIVE DATE By:��iuiCi''17 ifin< Deputy Clerk to Boa COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CHILD AND ADULT CARE FOODAGREEMENT NUMBER PROGRAM 65203-005 APPLICATION FOR CHILD CARE CENTER INSTRUCTIONS: Complete in duplicate.It a sponsored facility,the Original(and required ettaChments)must be submitted with CACFP 302 (Application for Sponsor of Child and Adult Care Centers). Type or print clearly. t. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CENTER!FEEDING LOCATION) a, DO YOU CARE FOR CHILDREN IN SHIFTS? YES., NO— Frederick Head Start Shift am mean*that children are coming and going at all times of the 2140? R SG g&$ad 8 ay ao that Ms Mal number Of Udder,attending the center on a daily ( 03 X33-Q�P38 Claw dew eased the items alt.ata TELEPHONE NO.: COUNTY: Weld 9. HOURS OF OPERATION FROM 8:00 a.m. TO 5:00 P.M. 2. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON RESPONSIBLE AT CENTER 10.NUMBER OF OPERATIN% ti.NUMBER OF OPERATING Agnes Martinez DAYS PER WEEK y WEEKS PER YEAR 32 3. TYPE OF FACILITY 12. ANNUAL OATES OF OPERATION -NONPROFIT CHILD CARE CENTER STARTING 0ct_ 1- 1990 ENDING M 31 199fL OUTSIDE•SCHOOL•HOURS CENTER —FOR PROFIT TITLE XX CENTER(Mess&also submit 13, LIST ANY MONTHS OURING WHICH YOU WILL NOT CLAIM MEALS HEAD START vy Agreement Addendum) AND SNACKS FOR REIMBURSEMENT(Include dates of clOM0 n and —LL TART PROGRAM reopening). —MIGRANT HEAD START PROGRAM NUMBER OF HEAD START CLASSROOMS: AM-- PM— NUMBER OP CHILDREN IN EACH CLASSROOM 14 00 YOU NOW PARTICIPATE IN OR HAVE YOU PARTICIPATED IN FEDERALLY-FUNDED PROORAMS(INCLL/DINC)CACFP AND 4. IS CENTER LICENSECL OR APPROVED BY FEDERAL OR STATE • NATIONAL SC L LUNCH PROGRAM) IN THE PAST THREE AUTHORITY? YES NOT �YEARS? MESS NO �� EXPIRATION DATE 5-23-89 CACFP 5/80 toapresent Pr es ntantl tlarea Ol p.rfklgd0n) LICENSE CAPACITY Q(1 la your Head Start site licensed as a child care tenter by the Colorado Department of Social Services during times when Head Start is not In session? YESL NOT 6. AGE RANGE OF ENROLLED CHILDREN - 15. DO YOU PARTICIP.STE IN THE COLORADO PRESCHOOL . FROM 4 TO ; PROJECT? YES.IL NO_ 0. DO YOU CARE FOR INFANTS FROM BIRTH THROUGH YES NO 16. IS THIS A PRNATE ORGANIZATION', 12 MONTHS? t•PRIVA7E"mesns nongovemmenra0 YES T NO X- 12 YOU CLAIM THESE INFANTS ON THE CACFP? - -X_ 17. IS CENTER SPONSORED? YES-X. NO T If'YEW'give name of sponsor(Sponsor must submit CACFP 902). 7. DO YOU CARE FOR SPECIAL NEEDS CHILDREN/ NO Weld County Department of Human Resources INFANTS ON A REGULAR BASIS? P.O. Box 1803 WILL YOU CLAIM THESE CHILDREN/INFANTS ON THE CACFP? I Greeley, Colorado 80631 ta. IS THIS A PRICING OR NONPRICING PROGRAM?(Check one) _�Y PRICING(Plies&contact our elflike for further Inetryoaon 331.6351) IL NONPRICINO In a pricing program,centers esteollsh a charge separateWm tuition t0r meals in ortlerto make up the difference between the reimbursement provided by me CACFP anti the actual coat of serving me meals. In a nonprlcing program,famines pay general tuition cnapa that coven all anrea OI child care seMCes provided by ter center,including maid mere la no identifiable separate charge lOr meals served to any children in care All participating.centers or sponsom are eligible to receive advance payments.Advances are requested monthly by filling out an advance Mein.The amount of advance money shall not exceed a ty0lcal month's rata of reimbursement and sflW be deducted from that month's claim for reimbursement. 19. CIVIL RIGHTS PLEASE NOTE: II you are a simple,independent center,complete Me Prealvard Compliance Review rather than this section. PROVIDE AN ESTIMATE OF THE RACIAL/ETHNIC MAKEUP OF TM£CHILDREN TO BE SERVED FROM SOURCES SUCH AS CENSUS TRACT DATA. PUBLIC SCHOOL DATA, HOUSING AUTHORITY DATA, ETC. IN ADDITION, GIVE THE ACTUAL RACIAL/ETHNIC BREAKDOWN OF YOUR CURRENT ENROLLMENT. ESTIMATE ACTUAL American Indian or Alaskan Native Asian or Pacific Istentier • Black(not of Hispanic origin) SeOS1.0c Hispanic �nr7 White(not of Hispanic origin) -40% CACFP-301 01901 20. MEAL SERVED BREAKFAST 1 SNACK LUNCH SACK SUPPER TIME OF MEAL SERVICE(S) 8:15 11:00. 2:00 NUMBER OF MEALS EXPECTED TO BE SERVED 1 18 36 18 _ METHOD BY WHICH MEALS WILL BE PROVIDED: __pREPARATION AT MEAL SERVICE LOCATION ARE MEAL PRODUCTION RECORDS BEING KEPT FOR EACH MEAL? PREPARATION AT CENTRAL KITCHEN YES.. NO' _ X-UNDER CONTRACT WITH LOCAL SCHOOL SYSTEM (SUBMIT COPY OF CONTRACT) ARE RECORD OF MEALS SERVED FORMS BEING KEPT FOR EACH -___UNDER CONTRACT WITH FOOD SERVICE CATERER MEAL? YES1L NO— (SUBMIT COPY OF CONTRACT) FOOD SERVICE BTPFF PATTERN(Enter only Personnel Pena will peAWm Cn/Id and Adult Cars Focal Program food aware,lunoNona in rnla canny) NAME OF POSITION NAME OF PERSON SPECIFIC CACFP FOOD NUMBER RIN F YEARSTAFF S SERVICE DUTIES THIS POSMON FrosmON Teacher Agnes Martinez Help with sprvin9 _ 1 12 • Teacher-aide Cecilia Autierrez Help-with. servine 1 1 Class-aide Eva Lopez heip .witn serving 1 2 _Rut driypr trant�Lt fOthi _ 1 21, I CERTIFY THATTHE INFORMATION ON THIS APPLICATION IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.THAT'WILL ACCEPT FINAL AOMINISTRA• TIVE.AND FINANCIAL.RESPONSIBILIT'FOR TOTAL CHILD 8 ADULT CARE FOOD PROGRAM OPERATIONS AT THIS CENTER IF NOT UNDER A . SPONSOR,THAT REIMBURSEMENT WILL BE CLAIMED ONLY FOR MEALS SERVED TO ENROLLED CHILDREN;THAT DEPARTMENT OFFICIALS MAY VERIFY INFORMATION;AND THAT DELIBERATE MISREPRESENTATION MAY SUBJECT ME TO PROSECUTION UNDER APPLICABLE STATE AND CRIMINAL STATUTES.AND THAT THE CACFP WILL BE AVAILABLE TO ALL ELIGIBLE CHILDREN REGARDLESS OF RACE.COLOR,NATIONAL ORIGIN,SEX HANDICAP,OR AGE. I UNDERSTAND THAT THIS INFORMATION IS BEING GIVEN IN CONNECTION ITH THE RECEIPT OF F DERAL FUNDS.AND THAT A DELIBERATE MISREPRESENTATION MAY SUBJECT ME TO PROSECUTION UNDER APP ABLE ST TE D F RAL CRIMINAL STATUTES. ATTEST: .....Se W t xd • pSglther 5. 1990 SIGNATURE OF ADMINISTRATOR OR AUTHOR/ REPRESENTATIVE DATE BY. sP6. �i`IraLCetti DeputliClexk to Bd COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CHILD AND ADULT CARE FOOD AGREEMENT NUMBER PROGRAM APPLICATION FOR CHILD CARE CENTER 65103-005 INSTRUCTIONS: Complete in duplicate.If a sponsored facility,the original(and nsouired attachments)must be Submitted with CACFP 302 (Application for Sponsor of Child and Adult Care Centers). Type or print clearly. 1. NAME ANO ADDRESS OF CENTER (FEEDING CO^AT/ON) & 00 YOU CARE FOR CHILDREN IN SHIFTS? YES) NO— Family Educational Network of Weld County &Net cans means that Children are COMM()and gang at all nine.Of Me ,Mead start c days°that inetotal number Of enaction attending me center On.deify 520 13th AVenue30, Greeley_0 Colorado 80631 bases may ma.e the Iloenes eapaatr• TELEPHONE NO.: COUNTY: L(elrl 9. HOURS OF OPERATION FROM 8:00 a.m. To 5:00 p.m. 2. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON RESPONSIBLE AT CENTER 1D.NUMBER OF OPERATING 11.NUMBER OF OPERATING Tere Keller, Director DAYS PER WEEK weeks PER YEAR 3. TYPE OF FACILITY 12. ANNUAL OATES OF OPERATION NONPROFIT CHILD CARE CENTER 0Ct. 1, 1990 June 30, 1991 OUTS:DE•SCHOOL•HOURS CENTER STARTING ENDING —FOR PROFIT TITLE XX CENTER(Must also submit Agreement Addendum) 73. LIST ANY MONTHS DURING WHICH YOli WILL NOT CLAIM MFALS _X_MEAD START PROGRAM AND SNACKS FOR REIMBURSEMENT(Include dates of closing and ra0penlnp). _MIGRANT HEAD START PROGRAM NUMBER OF MEAD STARTCtASSROOMS:7-5 7.5. AMA PM NUMBER OF CHILDREN IN EACH CLASSROOM - IA DO VOU NOW PARTICIPATE IN OR HAVE YOU PARTICIPATED IN FEDERALLY-FUNDED PROGRAMS(INCLUDING CACFP AND 4. IS CENTER LICENSED OR APPROVED BY FEDERAL OR STATE NATIONAL SCHOOL LUNCH PROGRAM) IN THE PAST THREE AUTHORITY? YES•JL NO YEARS? YES NO EXPIRATION DATE on 1S0 (lrC7F�„pAglpa pOPrpprpsnand dams of pamklpatlon) LICENSE CAPACITY HLhY /OU L present la your Head Start site 'lensed es a child care center by the Colorado Depanment of Social Services during times wnen Head Start is not in session? YES—X NO— S. AGE RANGE OF ENROLLED CHILDREN 10. DO YOU PARTICIPATE IN THE COLORADO PRESCHOOL . FROM 4 TO 5 PROJECT? YES_ NO— B DO YOU CARE FOR INFANTS FROM BIRTH THROUGH YES NO 1& IS THIS A PRIVATE ORGANIZATION? 12 MONTHS? X ("PR/VATS"means nomgo,emmennsp YES_ NOX WILL YOU CLAIM THESE INFANTS ON THE CACFP? = IL 17. IS CENTER SPONSORED? YES X_ NO If'YES,'gala named sOehaer(Sponsor must submit CACFP 302). 7. DO YOU CARE FOR SPECIAL NEEDS CHILDREN/ YES NO Weld County Department of Human Resources INFANTS ON A REGULAR BA3157 Xyr — 2D. BOX 1805 WILL YOU CLAIM THESE CHILDREN/INFANTS ON THE CACFP? - - Greeley, Colorado 80632 1& IS THIS A PRICING OR NONPRICING PROGRAM?(Cheat One) �.PRICING(Please Genteel our&floe for further Instruction 331.a3S1) •K_NONPRICING In a pricing program,centers establish a charge separate from tuition/anneals/A picket°make up the difference between the mlmbursement provided by the CACFP and the actual coat of serving the meal& Ina nbnpncing program,families Day general rualOn Charge that COMM all areas of child dare services OrOWdad by fha canter,I:wardlrp meals Thera/a ne,ldanrdlable separate Charge/Or meals served SO any cnndren in Care. All participating Centers or sponsors are eligible to recant advance payments.Advances are requested monmy by tiding out an advance torm.The amount of advance money shall not ellCeed a typical month's rata of reimbursement and shall be deducted from that month's claim fOr reimburaament. 19. CIVIL RIGHTS PLEASE NOTE: If you are a single, independent Center.complete the Preawald Compliance Review rather than this section. PROVIDE AN ESTIMATE OF THE RACIAL/ETHNIC MAKEUP OF THE CHILDREN TO BE SERVED FROM SOURCES SUCH AS CENSUS TRACT DATA, PUBLIC SCHOOL DATA, HOUSING AUTHORITY DATA ETC. IN ADDITION, GIVE THE ACTUAL RACIAL/ETHNIC BREAKDOWN OF YOUR CURRENT ENROLLMENT. ESTIMATE ACTUAL American Indian or Alaskan Native Q Asian Of Pacific Islander 2 9\„ CiSIA Slack(not of Hispanic Orglh) r 6 ,®Ov Hlapan C White(not of HaDanic Origin) CACFP-301 (3/90) Am PM 20. MEAL SERVED BREAKFAST SNACK LUNCH SNACK SUPPER • TIME OF MEAL SERVICE(S) f NUMBER OF MEALS EXPECTED TO BE SERVED METHOD BY WHICH MEALS WILL BE PROVIDED: X PREPARATION AT MEAL SERVICE LOCATION ARE MEAL PRODUCTION RECORDS BEING KEPT FOR EACH MEAL? PREPARATION AT CENTRAL KITCHEN YESx NO _—UNDER CONTRACT WITH LOCAL SCHOOL SYSTEM (SUBMIT COPY OF CONTRACT) ARE RECORD OF MEALS SERVED FORMS BEING KEPT FOR EACH UNDER CONTRACT wITH FOOD SERVICE CATERER MEAL? MESA_ NO_ !SUBMIT COPY OF CONTRACT) FOOD SERVICE STAFF PATTERN(Enter only personnel who will perform Chile end Adult Cate Pool Propnm lope sends luncrlons m rh(s Gently) SPECIFIC CACFP F000 NUMBER OF YEARS NAME OF POSITION NAME OF PERSON SERVICE DUTIES STAFF iN IN THIS THIS POSITION POSITION Cook Dorothy Sereatte prepares menu, food 1 1 yr. rank-Aide , Sharon_Mullis _ assist Cook _ 1 • 1 yr. Teacher to be determined assist children with food 7.5 varies Teacher-Aide to be determined Assist children with food 7.5 varies review menu, production Director Tere Keller records, claim forms 1 1 yr. 21, I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION ON THIS APPLICATION IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE;TWAT I WILL ACCEPT FINAL ADMINISTRA- TIVE AND FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR TOTAL CHILD A ADULT CARE FOOD PROGRAM OPERATIONS AT THIS CENTER IF NOT UNDER A SPONSOR.THAT REIMBURSEMENT WILL BE CLAIMED ONLY FOR MEALS SERVED TO ENROLLED CHILDREN;THAT DEPARTMENT OFFICIALS MAY VERIFY INFORMATION;AND THAT DELIBERATE MISREPRESENTATION MAY SUBJECT ME TO PROSECUTION UNDER APPLICABLE STATE AND CRIMINAL STATUTES,AND THAT THE CACFP WILL BE AVAILABLE TO ALL ELIGIBLE CHILDREN REGARDLESS OF RACE COLOR,NATIONAL ORIGIN,SEX, HANDICAP,OR AGE I UNDERSTAND THATTHIS INFORMATION IS BEING GIVEN IN CONN TIONW T RCI�DERAL FUNDS,AND THAT A DELIBERATE MISREPR SENTATION MAY SUBJECT ME TO PROSECUTION UNO APP C L .0 F ERAL CRIMINAL STATUTES. I ATTEST: /,J Weld County Clerk to Board i � September 5, 1990 SIGNATURE OF ADMINISTRATOR OR AUT q/HMCO REPRESENTATIVE DATE By:,3 / I rc, Deputy(P k J rlerk to Board • COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Agreement Number: 6513-005 �� CHILD & ADULT CARE FOOD PROGRAM Family Educational Network of Weld County • EEMENT FOR CHILD CARE CENTER OR Name el Contra SCOW* SPONSOR OF CHILD CARE CENTERS In Order to Carry Out the purpose of Section 17 of the National School c Collect family size and Income information on the Income Lunch Act, as amended, and the Regulations governing the Child & Eligibility Form(IEF)for children enrolled at all the centers listed Adult Care Food Program(CACFP)issued thereunder(7 CFR Part 228) on Schedule A t0 determine which children are from families the Colorado Department of Health(hereinafter referred to as the State meeting the income eligibility guidelines for free Or reduced Agency),and the Center or Sponsor,whose name and address appear meats.Children for whom family size and income information is above,agree as follows: not available shall be repOrted under the paid(not eligible for tree or reduced meals)Category only.An MP Is valid for 12 THE STATE AGENCY AGREES THAT: months from the data the canter or sponsor approves it. Meals may be claimed for reimbursement beginning with To the extent Of funds available, it shall reimburse the institution for that data. It is never retroactive iron the approval data. creditable meals served t0 eligible children at child Care centers listed Meals tlalmed attar the lxpiratlOn data can Only b• on Schedule A attached hereto, dunng the effective periCO of this claimed in the paid category. Agreement.During any fiscal year,the amount of reimbursement paid to the center or sponsor shall be based on actual count of meals served by 0. Claim reimbursement only for meals served to eligible enrolled eligibility categOry• children in each income Category within the limits of the license or registration certificate.No more than 2 meals and 1 snack per child shall be claimed.However,it a child is in care over 8 hours. THE CENTER OR SPONSOR AGREES THAT: then an additional meal or snack may be claimed per child.In this case,sign-in/sign-out sheets must be kept tOr all onildren 1. It will comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1984(P.L 88- claimed on the CACFP. 332) and ail requirements imposed by the regulations of the Department of Agriculture(7 CFR Part 15).Department of,Justice ei. Submit Claims for Reimbursement in accordance with pro. (28 CFR Parts 42 and 30),and FNS directives or regulations issued cedures establiahed by the State Agency, Claims that are pursuant t0 that Act and the regulations.t0 the effect that no per- received by the State Agency after noon on the 10th of the son in the United States shall,on the ground of race.Color.sex, momh snail beproeeaeed for payment the f011owingmonth.Only national origin or anCestry,age,or handicap,be e%CIr10ed from par- final cl%Ime received within 60 days following the Close Of the ticipation in,be denied the benefits of.or be otherwise subject t0 Claim month shall be eligible for reimbursement discrimination under any program or a0trvity for which the inatitu• tIon receives Federal financial assistance from the State Agency f. Store,prepare.and sans food In COnfomiance with all applic- and hereby gives assurance that it will immediately take any able State and total health laws and regulations, measures necessary t0 effectuate this Agreement This assurance is given in consideration of and for the purpose Of obtaining any and 9, Use cash-received-in-lieu-of COmmodltles for the purchase of all Federal financial assistance,grants,and loans of Federal funds, reimbursable expenditure&grant or donations of Federal property. Ely accepting this assurance.the institution agrees to compile data. maintain records,and submit reports as required,to permit ethic- h. Maintain full and accurate records of the Program• and rive enforcement 01 Title VI and permit authorization personnel Our- retain such reteroa for a period of three years and tour ing normal working hours to review such record& books, and months agar the hid of the fiscal year to which they accounts as needed tC ascertain compliance with Title VL It there pertain• are any violations of this assurance,the Department Of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service,or the State Agency,shall have the right i. Make all accounts and retort%pertaining tO the Program avail- t0 seek Judicial enforcement of this asaurance.This assurance is able to the State Agency and to USDA for audit Or review at a binding on the Center or sponsor.its Successors.transferees,and reasonable time and place. assignees as long as it receives assistance or retame possession of any assistance from the State Agency. j. Provide adsouete supervisory and operational personnel for overall monitoring and management of each food service opera- 2. the governing body is responsible for the administration of the lion,and to promptly take such aCtiona that are necessary to centers listed on Schedule A Of this Agreement,or it isan agenCy t0 correct deficiencies foun0 at the time of any onaite visit,review, which the centers listed on Schedule A have delegated authority Or audit for the operation of the food service program. k if a sponsor, monitor all centers at least 3 times each year, 3. In order to qualify for reimbursement under this Agreement it shall including Once during the tint 0 weeks of CACFP operation. COnduCt the Program in accordance with reputations governing the These reviews Cermet be more than 6 months apart.All outside- Child &Adult Care Food Program (7 CFR Part 226),appropriate SChogMhours Centers must be monitored at least 6 times each OMB circulars, State regulations, State Agency Matte& and year,including Once during the first month of CACFP operation. specifically,shall conform t0 the following requirements: These reviews cannot be more than 3 months apart. a Operate a nonprofit food service using all of the income solely 4. It is a public organization or nonprofit organization which has tax for the operation or improvement of such service. exempt status such as under section 501(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1934,or is moving toward compliance with the b. Serve meals which meet the minimum nutritional requirements requirements of the aforementioned section in accordance with specified in Schedule 8 0l this Agreement. Section 226.18 of the Program regulations. -on Serve the same meal at no separate charge from tuition to If a For Profit Tttie XX center,it certifies that it receives funds under enrolled children who are in attendance at meal time(non- Title XX of the Social Seeunry ACt toe at toast 23 percent of each pricing institution)and so designate on Application Form center's enrolled children during the month preceding application and Nondiscrimination Policy Statement and abide by the to or renewal of the Program and shall continue tO certify such infor- terms of the Nondiscnmination Policy Statement and Pro• matron in each SUCCeedrnd month.The institution shall nOt Claim gram Verification Rules(Regulations 228.23 hit reimbursement for meals served in any For Profit Center for any -or- month dump which the center raCeives Title XX funds for lens than Have an identifiable Separate Charge from tuition for meals 23 percent of its enrolled children. served to enrolled children (pricing inahtutiOn) and s0 designate on Application Form and NOndistriminati0n 5. All Child Care centers listed on Schedule A have a valid license or Policy Statement and abide by the terms of the Nondis- registration certificate fOr providing Child care.--- cnminati0n Policy Statement and Program Verification R'$w, Rules(Regulations 226.23 h.2). 6. It provides organized child care in nonresidential situations CACFP 300(5/901 PAGE ONE 7. It accepts final financial and administrative responsibility for total The Agreement may be terminated upon ten fl 0)days written nonce on CACFP operations for each child care Center under rts )iris- the part of either party hereto.and the State Agency mayterminate this diction. Agreement immediately atter receipt of evidence that the terms and conditions Of this Agreement and of the regulations governing the Pro- 8 It will annually make available to the local media serving the area gram nave nOt been fully complied with by the center Or Sponsor,Any from which the center or sponsor draws its attendance,8 public termination of this Agreement by the State Agency shall be in accord release announcing the availability of meals to all eligible enrolled with apWipble laws and regulations(Federal Regulations 220.6 10C). children without regard to race, color. sex, national origin, age, No termination or expiration of this Agreement,however,shall affect the or handicap. Obligation of the center or sponsor to maintain end retain records and to make such records available for audit.A Center or sponsor may appeal a 9. It understands and agrees that any materials developed with Pro- termination aCCMtling to DPOCeduroa outlined in 7 CFR Part 220. gram funds by the center or sponsor may be freely reproduced,Pro- duced,or otherwise used by the USDA Feed and Nutrition Service, The terms of this Agreement shall net be modified or changed in any the Colorado Department of Health,or by Other institutions under way other than by the consent in writing of both parties hereto, the Child 8 Adult Care Food Program. . RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENTS THE STATE AGENCY AND CENTER OR SPONSOR MUTUALLY The center or sponsor must keep full and accurate reCOrds pertaining to AGREE THAT: its fOOd service as a basis for the Claim for Reimbursement and fOr audit 1. Schedule A listing centers approved for participation and meals 10 and review Purposes The teems t0 be kept include the following: be claimed for reimbursement,shall be a pert of this Agreement. 1. Menus and food eduction records indicating gwntdba of foods Centers or meals may be added to or deleted trom Schedule A pr number Of Persons prepared f as the need arises. All such changes must be confirmed in OreDaroO, for,and serving sizes.TAO writing and sent to the State Agency. All such references t0 food production record must include the number of adults Schedule A shall be deemed t0 inciude such Schedule as sup- served• olemented and amended. 2. Daily record 01 meals served t0 children broken down by name by 2. The State Agency shall notify the Center Or sponsor of any charge type of meal (breakfast, lunch, Supper, or snack) and DY income in the minimum meat re0urrements or in the appllCable rates Of CatepOry-free,reduced,or pail (Record of Meals Served form). reimbursement OS Soon as POSaible after notlfipfier)frOm USDA 3. Approved Income Eligibility Forms for enrolled children categonzed 3. The center or sponsor may contract with a local aCh001 feed se free Or reduced. authority or with a feed service management company for the MOP- station and delivery of meals or meal COmpOnents•The Center or 4. Documentation of income to the feed service operation from funds sponsor shall remain responsible for fulfillment of the terms Of the to subsidize food service program,from State Agency CACFP reim- Agreement.The Center or sponsor must submit a copy of this con- buroement.from payments for adult meals and from all other sour- tract to the State Agency. lies,including loans and donations to the:pod service program. 4. For the purposes of this Agreement the following' terms shall 5. Invoices or receipts from food service Operation purchases includ- mean, respectively: ing bills from food service management Companies.Payroll records including fringe benefits,equipment costs,malntenente and repair fees,office Costs.utilities COS and other administrative costa. DEFINITIONS "Children"means(a)hers up to their 13th birthday and under, This documentation shell ensure that all reimbursement funds are (b)Children Of migrant workers 15 years of age and under,and(C) used:(1)solely for the conduct of the food service.Or(2)to improve mentally or physically handiCaDDed persons, as defined by the suCh feed Service operations principally for the benefit Of the State Agency,enrolled in an Institution or child taro facility serving enrolled children.DOCUMENTATION OF ALL COSTS PERTAIN- S majority of persons 18 years of age and under, INC TO THE OPERATION OF THE CACFP MUST BE SPECIFIC- ALLY ITEMIZED. DOCUMENTATION MUST CLEARLY SHOW "Enr011ed child"means a Child whose parent or guardian has sub- THAT THE FOOD SERVICE IS NONPROFIT BASED ON ALL mitted t0 the Center or sponsor signed document which indicates CACFP INCOME AND EXPENSES. that the child is enrolled for child we. 6. License,registration,or certficatiOn dOcumentation "Milk" means pasteurized fluid types of unflavored Or flavored 7 Documentation of visits t0 Child Care Centers to monitor com- whole milk lowfat milk skim milk,or cultured buttermilk whlCh meet State and local standards for suCh milk except that,in the meal Pat* Whence.This requirement pertains only tO sponsors who administer tern for infants(0 tot year of age),"milk"means unflavored types of more than one child pre center in accOrdanCe with Federal whole fluid milk or an eOuivslent quantity of reconstituted Regulation 226.18(0). evaporated milk which meets such standards.All milk should con- tain vitamins A and D at levels speedied by the Food and Drug 8. Documentation of em r.lment Administration and be consistent with State and IOpI standards for such mllk. 9. Documentation of attendance (r011bO0ks or sign in/sign out sheets) -verification" means a review of the information reported by the center or sponsor to the State Agency regarding the eliglbrity of 10. Documentation of Civil Rights racial/ethnic data enrolled children for tree or reduced meals. 11, Documentation of sett training pertaining to CACFP This Agreement shall be effective with respect to meals sorted during the period commencing the tit day 01 October 1920 and 12 Copy of press release sent annually 10 the media ending September JO, 1992 unless terminated earlier as harem provided.The State Agency may renew this Agreement,by notice in writing given to the center or sponsor,for such period attunes are avail- 13. Special Diet Statement or Special Diet Statement tor Handicapped able for carrying out the Program.The State Agency Agreement fo relm- Child documenting venances from the CACFP meal patterns. Ours° Me center Or S1,tOnsor is conditioned upon the continued availability Or tundS■ppropriateo for Child IL Adult Care Food Program In 14. Food service management company contract or other fOOCI e sulbCienl amount,and nO lapel liability on me part or me DOvenlment servite COntracta, /Or the Payment OI any money shall arise unless and until such apemen. anon Shall have been provided. 15. All Department Of Social Services contract(a)- For Profit Title XX Centers only, 16. Record of payment and bining forms from Department of Social I^ Services- For Profit Title XX centers Only I 117. Record of deposit of CACFP reimbursement i PAGE TWO ) L.1 • g SCHEDULE A • Fill in the name an0 address of centers participating in the Child 6 Adult Cate F00d Program. (Attach additional 9/WM it Watery.) HOURS AND TYPE OF MEALS SERVED TYPE OF No more than 2 meats end ,angel<per child CENTER snail he Clanged OE►ARYNfNt OF However,ll a child is In care over a hours.MM an C• C>ve SOCIAL SERVICES additional meal or snack may tat Veiniest per child. NAME AND ADDRESS =con OF CENTER �� rear, uCENSE SUM- AM PM S: irn a NUMBER 'sr SNACK WNCH SNACK SUPPER 1-Greeley :-lead Start Center H 58236 520 13th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 ' (303)356-0600 • * 2-Frederick- Head Start H 66816 Center 340 Maple Street Frederick, Colorado 80520 (303)833-2230 * 3-Milliken Head Start H Center Milliken Elementary 300 Poroad Street Milliken, Colorado 80543 (303)737-2403 4-Island Grove Head Start H Center . 119 14th Avenue . Greeley, Colorado 80631 (303)352-2627 SCHEDULE Ef • Requirements for Meals -- Child & Adult Care Food Program Each institution participating in the Program shall serve one or more of (2) lunch or supper-1/2 cup of milk:1 ounce ledible portion as the following types of meals.as provided in its approved■ppscation:(1) served)of lean meat,poultry,or fish,or 1 ounce of cheese.Or Breakfast, (2) Lunch. (3) SuPPer. (4) SnaCks served between such 1 egg,or 1/4 cup of cooked dry Deans or peas:or 2 table- other meals. eDOOns of peanut butter, 1/4 cu0 of vegetables or fruits or both consisting of two or more kinds: 1/2 slice of bread or 1. E%CeOt as otherwise provided in this seCtion,and in any appendix to tread alternate,Or 1/s.Cup Of cooked enriched or wnOle• this part, each meal shall cOnt am, as a minimum, the food corn• gram rite,maCaronr,noodles,or Other pasta products. Portents as follows: a. A breakfast shall contain: (3) Snack—select two Of the following four COmponents-1/2 Cup of milk: 1/2 ounce of meat or meat alternate (which (1) A serving of fluid milk as a beverage,or on cereal,or used in includes 2 ounces or 1/4 cup of yogurt):1/2 Cup Of juice,or Dart for each purpose. equivalent quantity Of fruit,or vegetables:1/2 shoe of bread or bread alternate, or 1/s. cu0 (velum.) or 1/3 ounces vegetable(s)or fruit or vegetable or (weight),whichever is less,of cereal.or 1/4 cup of COOked 121 A serving of vegetable(s) ofenricned or whole-grain rice, macaroni, noodles or ether fruit Juba. Or an e0uwatent quantity of any combination these f000s. pasta products. (3) A serving Of whole-grain or enriched broad;or an equivalent a Age 3 up to 8: serving of cornbread,biscuits.rolls,muffins,etc_made with (1) Breakfast-3/a cud of milk, 1/2 cup of Juice or fruit or whole•gram or enriched meal or flour;or•serving of whole vegetables;1/2 Slice of broad or bread alternate,or 1/3 cup grain or enricned or fortified cereal;or a serving of cooked (velume)Or 1/2 Ounce(weight),whichever is less Of Cereal or wnote-grain or enriched pasta or noodle products such as an equivalent quantity of both bread and cereal macaroni,or cereal grams such as rice,bulgur,or corn grits: or an equivalent quantity of any combination of any of (2) Lunch or supper-3/s.Cup Of milk,1 1/2 ounces(edible por- these foods. ti0n as served)of lean meat.poultry,or fish.Or 1 1/2 Ounces of cheese,or 1 egg.Or 3/8 cup Of cooked dry beans or peas, b. Both lunch and supper shall contain: or 3 tablespoons of peanut butter,1/2 cup of vegetables or (1) A serving of fluid milk as a beverage. fruits or both consisting of two Or more kinds, 1/2 slice of bread or bread alternate.Or 1/4 cup of cooked enriched or (2) A serving of lean meat,poultry or fish:or Cheese:oran egg;or whole-Wain nits, Macaroni, noodles Or other pants cooked dry Deans or peas; or nuts or nut butters; or an products. equivalent quantity Of any combination of these fiac la These foods must be served in a main dish,or in a main dish and one (3) Snack—select two of the fOllOwirg components-1/2 Cud Of other menu item,to meet this requirement.Cooked dry beans milk;1/2 Ounce of meat or meat alternate(which Includes 2 Or dry peas may be used as the meat alternate or&sport of the ounces or 1/4 cu0 of yogurt); 1/2 cup of juice or an vegetable/lruit component,but not as both food components equivalent quantity of fruit or vegetables; 1/2 slice of breed in the same meal. or bread alternate;or 1/3 cup(vOlurne)Or 1/2 Ounce(weight). whichever is leas.Of Creator 1/4 cup of cooked enriched or (3) A serving of two or more vegetables or fruits,or a combination whOfirgrann rice,maternal.noOGIrte or other pasta ProdiaChs Of both.Full-strength vegetable or fruit juice may be counted to meet not more than one-nett of this requirement c Age 8 through* 12 (1) Breakfast-1 Cup Of milk 1/2 cup of juice or fruit or (4) A serving 01 whole-grain or enriched bread:Or an equivalent vegetables; 1 slice Of bread Or bread alternate,or 3/4 Cup serving of cornbread. biscuits. rolls, muffins. ate, made of (volume)or 1 ounce(weight),whichever re lest of cereal or whOle-grain or enriched meal or fl0ur,Or a serving of COOked equivalent quantity of both bread and cereal. wholegrain or enntned pasta or noodle products such as macaroni,or cereal grains such as rice,bulgur,orcom grits;or (2) Lunoh Or auDPer—1 cup of milk:2 ounces(edible portion as an equivalent Quantity of any combination of these fo0gs. served)Of lean meat poultry,or fish.Or 2 Ounces of cheese C. Snack shall be served between other meal types and COntain two Or 1 egg,or 1/2 cub cooked dry beans peas.Of table* apo0ns of peanut butter;3/4 cup of vegetables br ablea fruits or of the f0llOwing four comPOrtentS: bOth consisting of two or mOro kinds: 1 slice Of bread or (1) A serving of fluid milk as a beverage,or on cereal,or used in bread alternate. Or 1/2 cu0 Of Cooked enricned Or whole- part for each purpose. grain rice, macaroni,noodles or Other pasta produCts. (2) A serving of meat or meat alternate. (3) Snack—select two of the following four componems-1 cup of milk 1 ounce of meat or meat alternate(which includes 4 (3) Asarvinp of vegetable(s)orfruit(s)or tull•nrength vegetable ounces or 1/2 CUD Of yogurt);3/4 juice ex equivalent quantity or fruit juice.Or an equivalent quantity of any combatantn of of fruit or vegetables;or 1 outillnce a of broad or bread alternate,or of these foods.Juice may not be served when milk is served as cereal cup(volume)cup or1ounce(weghed or whicheverietease. the Only other component. macaroni,lno0dles or other pasta prdducts,nole-grain rice. (4) Aserving of whole-grain or enriched bread:or an equivalent d. Age 12 and Over.Adult-sized portions based On the greater food serving of Cornbread,biscuits,rolls,muffins,etc made with needs of Older boys and girls. whole-grain or enriched meal Or flour,Or a serving of whole- gram or enricned or fortified cereal;or a serving of cooked whole-grain or enriched pasta or noodle products such as e. infant meal patterns: macaroni,or cereal grains such as rice,bulgur,Or Corn grits; (1) 0 through 3 months: or an equivalent quantity of any Combination of these foods. (a) Breakfast-4.6 fluid ounces of iron-fortified infant formula. 2. Extent as Otherwise orOvided in this section the minimum amounts of component foods t0 serve at meals asset forth in subparagraphs (b) Lunch or supper-4.6 fluid ounces of iron-fortified (b) (1),(2),and(3)of this section are as follows: infant formula a. Age 1 up to 3; (C) Snack-4-8 fluid ounces of Iron-fortified infant formula (1) Breakfast-1/2 cup of milk, 1/4 cup of halter or fruit or vegetables,t/2 Slice of Dread Or Dread alternate,Or 1/4 cup (2) a through 7 months; (volume)or1/3 ounce(weight).whichever Is lest of meat or (a) Breakfast-4.8 fluid ounces of iron-fortified infant 'Or- an equivalent quantity of both bread and cereal, mule,0.3 tablespoons of iron-fortified dry infant cereal PAGE FOUR (o0tiona0. _ 9(08.e M3 lb) Lunch or supper-4.8 fluid ounces of iron-tortifed infant a. Breakfast: formula; 0.3 tablespoons of iron-fortified dry infant cereal(optional);0.3 tablespoons of fruit or vegetable M (1) Include as often as practical an egg,or a Trounce serving appropriate Consistency Or a Combination Of both (edible portion as nerved)Of meat,poultry Or fish;Or 1 ounCe (optional), of Cheese; or 2 tablesPObns 01 peanut bullet or an equivalent Quantity Of any combination of these tows. (C) Snack-4.6 fluid ounces of iron-fortified infant tormula. (2) Additional foods may be served as desired. (3) 8 months up t0 the first birthday: b. Lunch or supper:Additional toods may be served as desired. • (al Breakfast-6.8 fluid ounces of iron-fortified infant fomula or 6.8 fluid ounces of whole milk;2.4 tablespoons of iron- G Snack;Include as often as practical a serving of meat or alter- tonifled dry enfant cereal: 1.4 tables000ns Of trult or nate such as Desnut butter or Cheese or other foods needed to vegetable of appropriate consistency or a combination of satisfy appetites. both. 5, If emergency conditions prevent an institution normally having a (b) Lunch Or supper-6.8 fluid OunCes Of iron-tOrtifisd infant supply of milk from temporarily obtaining delivery thereof,the State formula,or 6.8 fluid ounces whole milk;2.4 tablespoons agency,may approve the service of breakfasts,lunches,or suppers Of iron-fortified dry infant cereal and/or 1.4 tablespoons without milk curing the emergency period. of meat,fish, poultry,egg yolk or cooked dry beans Or peas,or 1/2.2 ounces(weight)of Cheese or 1-4 ounces 6. SubstitutlOn, may lea made in food listed in paragraphs(b),(1),(2). (weight or volume)of Cottage Cheese or cheese 100d Of and(3)01 this seCtion 11 Individual participating children are unable, choose sOread of appropriate Consistency; and t-4 because Of metliCal or Other special dietary needs, to COnaume tablespoons Of fruit Or vegetable Of apprOpnale eonsis• such foods.Such substitutions shall be made only when supported tency Or a combination Ot Coin, by a atonement!roma recognized mediCal authority which Includes recommended alternate foods. (W Snack-2.4 fluid ounces of iron-fortified infant formula, whole fluid milk or full-strength fruit juice,0-1/2 slice of crusty enriched or wholegram bread (Optional), or 0.2 STATE AGENCY AND CENTER OR SPONSOR FURTHER cracker-type products(Optional)made from whole grain AGREE THAT: or enriched meal or flour and wnich are suitable for an meant for yae as a finger food. The Center or sponsor shall accept full responsibility for providing Breast milk,provided by the infant's mother,may tit served in place of Proper accountability,storage,and use of USDA commodity feeds and infant formula from birth through 11 months of age. However,meals handliin so doing,shaPDromptlyprovideawrlttenresponsetOclaimsthatme- containing only breast milk do not qualify for reimbursement. Meals stomp h e°Coca rte, and/or losses resulting ffOm improper cafe or Containing breast milk served to Infants 4 months of age or elder may De storage have oCCuneQ claimed for reimbursement when the other reouired meal component Or components are supplied by the child care fatuity. The center or aponsor shall use USDA commodity foods received under this Agreement solely tOr the bens&It of those persOns served or Silt- ed by the center or sponsor and shall not otherwise dispose of USDA commodity foods without*nor written approval of the State Agency. scaring cup. • 4, To improve the nutrition of participating children additional foods may be served with each meal as follows: • SIGNATURE ON BEHALF OF CENTER OR SPONSOR I Certify that the inlonnation on this form i3 true and cOmect tO t al dim kn e I nde and that this intormationa being given incon- nection wi rhe receipt of F eral funds,and that deliberate rep s tat ub)e a to prOseCutiOn under applicable State and Federal c al statutes. ATTEST: By.SA40 t if ibAs t e Board DeputyjClerk to Board signal a Chairman, Weld County Gene R. Brantner Board of Commissioenrs September S, 1990 Print Name Tate pale = Please comp:vie,sigm and return all 9 codes to me Colorado Depanmenr or Health Child 6 Adult Care FOOd Program. SIGNATURES ON BEHALF OF COLORADO DEPARTMENT or HEALTH CHILD & ADULT CARE FOOD PROGRAM For In! OieCubve D¢eCtor,COI0,100 DeOanmate Of Hearin Data • Administrator.CACFP tine ate TO BE FILLED OUT BY COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, Center or Sponsor w+n receive for its child care cemers.Head CHILD 8 ADULT CARE FOOD PROGRAM: Stan Centers,outside school-hours centers,Or RH lefent Tme XX Centers: Regular Donated Commodities OR Casn-moreu of Commodities wen bonus cOmmodess) PAGE FIVE r r w POLICY MEMO *CDR-90-6 + + + DATE: April S, 1990 TO: Child & Adult Care Food Program Participants FROM: Kathryn A. $runner, Administrator SUBJECT: 4th Meal Memorandum Child care centers may claim 4 meals (including snack) for each individual child, if the ghild is in care eight CU or more hours each day. In order to claim the 4th meal (or snack) for each in ivy gal child, you must: 1. Keep Records of Meals Served for the 4th meal (or snack) . 2. Keep food production records for this meal (or snack) . 3. Maintain time-in/time-out sheets for EVERY child in your center whether or not they are in care 8 hours. 4. Apply for the 4th meal by completing the bottom of this form and returning it to our office. As you can see, it may be an extra burden of paperwork to you to claim the 4th meal. And, although the 4th meal certainly may be a supper, in most centers it will be a snack. Reimbursement for snacks is 42 cents for Free, 21 cents for Reduced, and 3 3/4 cents for Paid_ Therefore, the amount_pf reimbursement may not be enough to cover the cost of the extra labor involved. Also, during our reviews, we have found that many centers do not have an accurate time-in/time-out sheet process. Either the sheets are incomplete pp they indicate that children in care less than 8 hours are claimed for meals. Because of this, we had to take back a significant amount of reimbursement money causing hardship to the centers. Therefore, someone must be assigned to monitor these time-in/time-out sheets if you claim the 4th meal. YES, a fourth meal will be claimed. Type of meal Time of meal Effective date YES, we keep time-in/time-out sheets. X NO, a fourth meal will nat be claimed. Family Educational Network of Weld County Name of Center or Sponsor , r September S, 1440 Signatur oft epresentative Date: ATTEST: By:C1tt Weld County Clerk to the Board L1CkL, V-1 i V (,- ,_ "re.,W-9 Request for Taxpayer I Give thnTann (Red.d.Amew(91171to the requester.Do oreertmeir mew Teeny I Identification Number and Certification Nor Mind wIRS. Joni Remove SMY,ta I w:)VanN (It Mom Avis.lettm lid woe ow name 0r ow none goofy wens flown Yee ante in On IDS See Inn if yeaar nave eateeee*L1 w • Faitla Fducationett(ptviork of Weld County a Acores s a 520 13th Avenue Gty.state.ana LP cooe g Greeley, Colorado 80631 la=Cause numoMs) here(oottonai) ► Ian Taxoayer Identification Number 98-03551 iiMil For Payton Exactor from Enter your taxpayer Idercanan numoer in Backup Withholding(Set mfi the aooroonate oox. I instructions) rOf other enuues. it a your employer 1 III identification numoer. If you ao not nave a OR numoer.zee how To Obtain a 71N. ae'ow. Reauester s name ana a0dretts(o0a0nai) Nom:It the accour risitr inOre elan one name, ,fFaileie,er i*elirrlupen nwnsar i See Me Chen on page 2 fOr guidelines on whose _ . , , , • numoer CO enret Certification,—unaer;amities of perjury.I cattily that (1) The numoer mown On this fOrm IS my correct taxpayer mem:Macon numoer(or I am ma long for a numoer t0 Oe Issued t0 me).and (2) I am not suoiect tO oackuo withholding either because I have not been nottfied by the Imemal Revenue Service(IRS)that t am suplect to daosuo wrtnnommg as a result of a failure to report ad interest or Cvnaenas.orate IRS has notifies me that I am nO(anger sudtea to bacxuo withholding(aces not a0pty t0 real estate transacjOns..'nOrtgage Mterelt paid.theaC0usL0on Oraoancontnemorsacwaso property,cOmnounons tO an individual retirement arrangement(IRA),ana payments other than mete=an0 OrvICIMCS). CartiflrationinsavatonS.—you Must aims out OMtamonif nave by that you'are twenty suaeatsoaaaroum:mi laing Pecause of uncenesorong interest or CrvraenOS on your tax return. A Soectic mstr eons.later.: Please i / A ST: ' al )tksPc.4 �`rYl r c fr•` Wen ' Signature► a \/L.:Pc er t he Deputy .C�lerk to the Board . Chalrmat. Dau► eDCetriber 5. 1990 Instructions outing tie dOmav Oen00.Me payment's you (s)you tar t0 Gentry your TIN.nesMaain recommit not oe sumac to me 20%baatuo otvy to interest swam broiler.or caner (Seaton refre tes are to me/nremat Revenue w(thn010eIf,unless you mare a mthOrawat. COMM Henn.6 me ndtieaur was not receive accounRe+ccaurits t ma ate 'in 953. p oroxr Purpose or Fem.—%arson wno is mg tram your aCCOWOtherts :Worn.macaw'in SuOuP repylra0 t° You wrtmn eJ pays.OathuO wimnol0ing, � file an inttemanOn,thin w,rn IRS must main if adorcane.wino �'OmrOayit(1)o(Otareluacens.camp egleanpccminwurimyou wainrWWNgomy,t(1)or(2)a0oveaoarar. your correct eaxpavr lOermrieanOn humor(TIN) tumrsn your TIN r0 inn reaws(er, t0 noon income MO t0 yOt,real*state .Noce Wrung'Ammo For'on me rorm means Certain ones Via o7VrnwRSan 0}M°0(}rp^ traMaCAens,menage interest you am.the Mar You tuwaarMOyapOwOrri)7N OR roar Jad(u0 wimrepongano inrorna°on mooning. acauismon or aoanaonmam p securer Oroperty. You mten to IMO'ror ono mine near tudara. Sae Foveae aflO Ptyments ZtenrorFronr daQuO or COntn0at10hs v0Y marls t0 an inOmOW l 'Withholding.snow,and&tempt Paweeand or com OutiOnn ma IRA).Use Fermi Assam as YOt Mann your THY.COmprere Payment's unaerSo*aM insIR,Qora.cm 2. gefn ( 9 to arable Form W9.matde your new TIN.sign d you are an exempt payee. � hams.,your correct TIN to m*mounter(ate on Gate Me fpm•art grya it t0 the reoutlter. Demon wog you to furors,'your non,art worn what w show owthitokNgt—Penpn maim Payees anfollowing Payments CX•M tf pm Ratio [ aoCl(aee.(I.)to CemM that the TIN you are Cefpin Oayiitentsroyou are reOuiredrovwmhOW furn(sning is cornett(2)tater*mat you are ana omens RS 20%or such aayntene tear are worm women,OathyO wrtnnOlmns ana not sumac to Doom°wimneetnt and(3)to certain consort.This is cameo'boohoo InfOrmeppn morn For Interestena mwde ds. claim esemotlon from cacao wnnnotding if you wWaWWMR..Pomienta that matt a havoc to tau lime oanes are exernot COOT item(9).For an an exempt tons FummmngyOyr COrrnt TIN oaten wannOWimt inaucle interest.dwideas. tbrraaanaaeoars.awtaroIn(1)Wens° anti mooing tea a OoroOnatecar°nowtiOns wilt apse,WC tarter expunge tnnsac°Ons,rents, (h)•7°°a Omen a Ath of a aoyaw e Omens Certain Oavment tech nog swim:toes. Irwesmiet(AOveers Aft of 19x0 wno ng'/'Irh me 20%oaauowitnhoimng. rortainpymets:twco ngooatWri.YW aCtSASO WOW Me rot.Payirnntssuawam Note:Ha,toter[, certain ayment3.Yam fisnlriq Oast OOMfOrs.Out r War wools 6041 aria 60e1A are �iesmua rOmt Omar than loo not include real estate transactions. Q00r°h� a W9 to ream(yaw 7N,you mint use the generally egret from ancuo wrtlMokengone d nru give the requester your correct TIN, reauestarsform. make tMa00rodnneeertitapars anareoort ail ma0erooay*ndasd'ledmrtams(I)tafqulp' kow 7o Obtaina nN.�f (n•maptmat a are mo t at thaw= you do not have a TfN, your taxa0ymtrestano df atatt aOn your tax medial ana health are semen Or bNs and you snout sooty for one immediately.TO amp/ return.Mr DaYnantS will not Ululate t0 culls payment%for such Sin=6 rWt Minot for the numoer,mem Fpm 556.Aopraation Sadao withholding.Payments you morn will a rpm ammo mtnnoicing or intents for a Social SOCOnty MIME'Card(Tor suctect M Cation witnnpang lh moonlit Onry pryees d*scrat us items(2) mowWwls).or Form 55.4 Aoolkanan for (1)you a not lumen you nn tome throw(5)are mama tom laptop ywmnOtding EmolOyer Mennhcatten NOmpr(fr businesaes reduester.or for Cann writing,dentiaapO.Dadmtasn ana ail MN'Inn).arson local atria or the (2)IRS notifies the mourner that you Oi mai n ls,and oaYriams Of Lanni awing Octet Social Saturn,/Admimncmon or me Intents' lumens°an mania TIN.or OOefettn. Revenue SnICII,WmOnt ana file me (3)you ate nolMd by IRS Met You me'Mr. (1)A COf00fanen. appropriate form actOMing tO its instructor. to=am witnoteutg&cause you tame to retort 7o comment Form W94 you to not have a (2)An OrgenlAlCn exam0t from tax IaWr TIN.write'a0olyd FOr in the SCA fr tin TIN ail decent accounts return (IRA). 5a custpan MOngtWre/rrlwntpyn In Part I,sn ano oats me tom',ana give R ro me ((r.ne�one�� eo ester p (IRA), T a unnu Status any ar nCy Or 7)_ recurstar.Fr payments that could be suaea to (a)you octee to certify ro me redwsur that you (3)The Un MiStets n any agMey Or bap(uo witnnea(ng,you era then nave 60 are rep sllolect to oatxuo wimnOWiftg untie(3) mstNmMtairy tn*redr. obtain a net and tumasn ifro the rectutl[M Ie aoow(fof imerm anti Om:WM accotnn 00riir0 titer 1983 onwl.if or nt' Cory" .9'Iyrar.CLOT, run*broker :2 47) sate Z (4)A state,me Ctsme of•Caikenoie.a Camera Penalty for feurtymg What Name and NUMMI'To Give the possession of the Unite°States.or any poetical hlfonnat•n.—Ndltuky falsifying Cern/mantra Reduester suonmsien or instrumentality Montt or affirmatpm may%laic.'mu to enmities (5)A forage government Or a oohtlal construe snowing rays soarer•n ersonment. For this type of Give the fame app suOmwsron,agency or mstrumentaury memo. SOCIAL SECURITY Specific le (6)anmramatonn m strucaans ]eeoutte number o orgy tatiOn or am f agency or instrumentality meteor. Name.+I ciu are an aa'wCUal.generally , :mime!re^Sine Spawn On.our social aecunN 'noNgWl The,ndty"tJal (7)A l0rrgn central bank or issue. Cam.�rJwc!rer .I•ray navy,^pan , 8)A Seder.n securities or comrnoam n flea your last 2. 7vp or more The acuat owner of name.,•s iifstanee.Sue to ramage.wanout .nanncualS(joint the account or,if reautrea t0 register in me V.S. :f a oossesslon Of mprmlrg tee Scelei Septum nommntranon Of :lie U.S. :lie oame nantot.dots may enter?Our first name aCJwflt) ^�m0tnlC elands.:`! I (5)A futures commission mertren[regtsterea ana tom me est name tnwn on your social tint 1nOmawal on me wren the Commborty F•ltures reacting Commission. tecupty ar0 ana your sew last name. aCdOwnLs (10)A real r[a:e'nyestrrieat taut. 3. Clroaian The mmOra Siprtne the Certification.-- aCswato(] (11)An Em my regtsterea at an nines Curing (2)1Mprs Dividend,ant:Barter Factures the tax year unto the nrsestmenT Cam parry Act Accounts owned past.1984 and ewe manorMele(Uniform of:SAO. Accounts That WereConndereo Am Outing Gaeta Minor= (:2)A Common trust lure 00eratea M a bank 1� under section C34/a I. c are (:11A financier ins`in:nOn. aoUrre0:0 ounce your corer.:TIN. :avOCi010 (141 A motionless Known in;lie Investment a)(Merest.Dividend.Broker and Barter sarongs;rust Community as a nominee or Mate°in the most Esarange Accounts Cleanse After 1983 and (grantor rs a:sO recent gu0htatlon or Me AmynCan SOCICTy Of Broker Accounts That Were Considered Motet) Corporate Secretanes.:nc..Nominee UST. Inane°W M: +gust stgn me S.SO�de:1 trust The acmes owner• r15)A trust exempt erom tax under secson Cfmnncon or OaCku0 wimn0"rng w'er Sooty.If Sc Nfli Mat:s 664 Or aesCripea in secton 4947. rots are SLC;le::0 a•ctYO wr[n^Olarng ant yid are merry Oromg your Cerre to the "OL]leg]I or yr C:^N Payments or CP/Senea aria patronage •e»•uerlr. .ou must cross out;t-em 12)In The gal"TfUST dlvia•naa gMaalm t.0[sUOree•.:0 Oacxuo oeytnanort:Cote s;gmngre•orrn. 4m:estate taw- 'mtnnagrng also moue,Tne following' •Payments TO nonresmenr attain suaect to :no a you(3)Ron EsCurate7fou may cross must sign 5. Saleoroteetorsmp•—`e Owners e c, ntion. may CPOss Jut nom(2)or wnhndprnq lanai secgon:441, the cORtiic4U0n vfytu wasp. •Pavn10f1fs LO arOTlrSnrOs na engaged in a (s)Obn.r rsfylMK w +gala ors repWUp to For this Type Of EMPLOYER the name ana !race or business in the U.S.anti Croat nave at Furman your art ut y re0 ec:ilk mg are not recut least one nonresioenTgar:rer. :0 sign MeeeftMearOmumesS YOU nave oven account IDENTIFICATION .Payments or Gateman women=not paid metric or an•nConett TIN.Omen payments numor oft en MOnev. acturae garments male in me course of the 6. A vac:cs t ent. Let •Payments mace 0v cram•of.,gn ergamations =untie i MOO 0r 7tWneSS rOf refR5•royalties. - � MY[�o not *n'JvmMtS or imann gemeMtty nor%urofecT co pots purer man one for m,rC,tanatSf).mfatal M•.-lTe.7r .r�Isr::lefdM- batku0wi[nn-•(.- C:-tie the fa"wi-- and n.am are sarv'Ces.garments:0a termer,Mit 70,0110n numder of 'oneMbrosri for se na(mr_uctutg attorney and :he:ersanal •Pavrnants or interest on aomomons issued by account,'tens.and oara:enes:Cartier riming npreserttative of nnawppais.Note YOu MO a,TUOraCT tO aaeav0 a0atoow mentors. :Name tonna the rwrnnaongrr` rs MrennOMS5000rmOreana 6% pagmmecourse or me gaver's:raoea0us/nest (5)'�ge interest Pate by gar.Aeeuwton • �etg3l ernULv;tsetfrs afro rots par,rim or m ea)Orr ntT 7)N r0 foss ar�aonrm°M ot Secured Preemie.or IRA -0t_esignated in the a s ;aver, mount are to krm m sn 3C':ue.1• .Pavnents of tox•esemtx trter,xt(Incluan your caret:..n.out you are not remind to sign 7. ar.�te -he c:rcoratiOn g of Centanon. exemotnnterest orwoMt3 under seetton 4521. (6)Emmet Payer and Pevfr•nts,—f you are a. AssomOOn.Cue..Me grgael bon •Psymems ve Stn0.0 a sseton 60a9(bX ) exeeorrom oaaluo wimneming,you snow" wen. t0 nMnSgenT aliens. COMOrei,LOTS TOfm CO avao 00isr1Myeneneous Gnama e. e Payments on tax-free cOyenant boncs under macaws withno1amg.inter your Mama TIN in eOutational.Or Ma lan 1451. Pim t.'wtte•$::Z.4APT-in ten MOOT an Pent If. ODTer MoexemOt ' • Psymeno mace ov cram toter organizations. cross out rten(21ot ten certification.sign anti organumon . mortgage apron pate OY yOV, cafe the farm.If ply NOD n0tergsM after or ?arCtarsnld The rotor entity not suoreCt to cocoa oa•ntimo"ang- 9. Oaratersmo Payments test are not%latch to information gyve me rep ow a=norm Farm W$ 10. A broker or i The broker or reporting are*ISO not SYOrar.:to Game om:cats of Foreign Status. regstered ,nominee mammamg.For aetaes.see swoons 6041. (7)tut-gi mo Fora—•;clew the WISMIaUms nominee 6041A(a).604Z 604.1.5245.6049.6050A.anti unarm nbw;o00fama 77M rnrw.suer Soso oafe 6050N.and the regulators una•r such sattipns. tots bat. • IL Account with theThe OuOtC entity Penalties Oearmtanrdt $)gnattne.�or a lam acc unt.omy the person Agnculture in the f Failure To Furnish TIN.-1f you fad to h+mtsn *nose in is sawn in Pak t snots"sign me term. mimeo(a mimic i your Came[nN t0 a r•duester,you are:ulna to Amor!AC Neticer—S•Caan 6109 moires you entity(such as a i a OSMAN Of 20 for 0000 SOCA n•ure Warns your :O narndn blur anew smcayer:aertihCatOfl 4em or local fatten is due CO reasonaOa CUSS and not TO number MN)OS OeK0.nS wwo Runoff government.snafu'negreet.. information retIMTS with Al:0 reoOR unrest. , Fallon To Intlwde Certain Items on Your lax ems•ano cerTam Omer Income oars!to you. semi dune.Or• Raturm.—d you fan us property'cockade on yew' m �^1[lresS yew paid.;.lie iCaW Wt10f1 K Dnsofl)t)mat I 30anaenmCt m satirep otop l tax mum certain.tents reported TO IRS.awn •Rye Or refxtyei failure will ten treetop as tang awe TO negligence. C:mnOunens you mass to an tndrwdwl aQ1yCJItYra1 pro- and you veil be so tser:a a credited gab on any Rumen for gMl eretirement �hcatroentn purposes and[once gRA).tR5 uses trieram caymans Dart of an Uf"lr7aVmenL Of tax]RrbutiDl,t0 rMty Te accuracy of gall tax return.You midst I UST nrST anti C C,ms name OT me Orson that fanure unless;Here is c ear and COr iteing awCMC!to me contrary. .lrpwa•vOyr any unroof nor you are reautrea 'mqs•rlenCeYOU fWmtsn. Gvd Niamey for Raise Informrtion With to tie a tax mm.u Pavers nun We l* : Grce me InTnOr'S name and kenos!,!Me wimrlold 20%of tenor limiest Menem!.and mmor's se at security nWme r. Respect to withfbldine.—1 you make a false certain Omer Cronints tea Owed wnq does not s Shaw ten name or the owner. statement t m alt a tin o real Minn i basis MgatW esrsuult%m wanly'a 7IN CO a Oaver.Caftan DenatM may • tat&nano cote Menem*of the w`M brat. *cede to a penally of 5500. 3130 JaOry. estate or onion Oust. Num if no narrow creed worn mare Moron MaI0 Sop oat if*llOffroerrrnIO•COOSIOel•0e0 O•COM.2r Me Frio nalrce rotted. .u.soratrr o'q a.3 COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CHILD AND ADULT CARE FOOD PROGRAM PREAWARO COMPLIANCE REVIEW Center or Sponsor Name: Family Educational Network of Weld Agreement # 65103-005 County The Colorado Department of Health,Child&Adult Care Food Program,is required to conduct a preaward civil rights com- pliance reviaw of centers or sponsors applying for CACFP participation, Please complete the following information. 1. ESTIMATE the racial/ethnic makeup of the population of the area to be served(approximate percentages)_Sponsor must combine this information for all centers.Usually this information can be obtained from the local school dis- trict, Chamber of Commerce, Census Bureau, or Public Library. American Indian or Alaskan Native Hispanic (a person of Mexican, Puerto Rican, Cuban, - Asian or Pacific Islander Central or South American,or other Spanish culture or origin, regardless of race) - Black (not of Hispanic origin) White(not of Hispanic origin) 2. `COUNT the actual number of children by racial/ethnic makeup in your center(s)and indicate those figures here. Sponsor must combine for all centers - American Indian or Alaskan Native Hispanic (a person of Mexican, Puerto Rican, Cuban, Central or South American,or other Spanish culture or - Asian or PacifiC Islander origin, regardless of race) - Black(not of Hispanic origin) White(not of Hispanic origin) 3. What efforts will be used to assure that minority populations&grassroots organizations have an equal opportunity to participate or are informed about charges in the Program? X Distribution of brochures of Program information at public locations X- Public service announcements in local newspaper,on radio,or on television (circle media type used) X Paid advertisements in local newspapers Other. Please explain: Did the items you checked above include the following nondiscrimination statement?Yes X No USDA forbids discrimination because of race,color,national origin,age,sex,or handicap.Any person who believes he or she has :een discriminated against in any USDA-related activity should write immediately to the Secretary of Agriculture.Washington, D.C. 20250. 4. Is membership in a specific organization required before children can be enrolled? Yes_ No If yes, please explain: 5. Have you ever been found to be in noncompliance of the Civil Rights laws by any federal agency? Yes_ No x If yes, please explain: 'Visual Identification may be used by centers or sponsor to determine the child's racial/ethnic CategOry.A Child maybe included in the group t0 which he or she appears to belong, identifies with, or is regarded in the community as belonging. Parents/ Guardians may be asked to identify the racial/ethnic group of their own Child only after it has been explained,and they under- stand that the collection of this information is strictly for statistical reporting requirements and has no effect On the determi ation of their eligibility to receive benefits under the Program.Aa nevi children are enrolled,you will need to deter- mine • racial/ethnic background and�keep this information in a confidential place. St: September S, 1990c04, SIGNATURE OF ADM' 1STRATOR OR AUTH RIZEO REPRESENTATIVE DATE ATTEST: BycNJ� kin(�rC�tt 1[ �aLt CACFP 102(5/g0 Deputy 1llerk to Board Weld County lerk to the Board (...iLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CHILD AND ADULT CARE FOOD PROGRAM CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORITY This is to certify that, ,i 1A�gree�mennt, # 65103-005 Gs e/1. - z 'l_Q � c_ S� e1.Y�L� . 2c s-, Signature Signatur Walter $Beckman Tere Keller Executive Director an1° Director P^ntNam. Department of Human Resources Family Educational Network of Weld County Tide Title Is the duly designated Authorized Representative(s)for. Family Fdurational_Network_of Weld County Name of Center Or SPOnsOr MAILING ADDRESS: (Your reimbursement check will be sent to this address.) 520 13th Avenue Street Address Greeley, Colorado 80631 City State zip Coos ( 303 ) 356-9600 Business Phone The Authorized Representative(s) is fully-empowered to enter into any agreement with the Colorado Department of Health Child and Adult Care Food Program and may act for the above-mentioned center or sponsor In preparing and signing documents and reports pertaining to the management of the Child and Adult Care Food Program. NATURE ON BEHALF OF CHILD CARE CENTER OR SPONSOR n�pJ Chairman, Wald County Signature of O icial of Center or Sponsor Board of Gomm t nuee9 [other than Authorized Representadve(s)i (Chair or President of Board. Executive Director,or Owner) Gene R. Brantner September 5, 1990 Print Name Date Return one copy to the Colorado Department of Health Child and Adult Care Food Program, and keep one copy for your files.When there Is a change of Authorized Representative it shall be the respon- sibility of the center or sponsor to request from this office forms to register the change.The signa- ture of the Authorized Representative on the Claim for Reimbursement must match the signature on this form or the Claim cannot be processed and your reimbursement will be delayed. It is to your benefit to have two peo(p/llle designated as Authorized Representatives. ATTEST: A l. ..%IG1 Ugh n Weld County Clerk to the Board By= iLe ti 7C" `-."'"\ .'%fig, Deputy Cr*mk to the Board sce7.1c cACFP 100(5/40) COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CHILD AND ADULT CARE FOOD PROGRAM STATEMENT OF AUTHORITY (FOR PROFIT CENTERS, DO NOT COMPLETE THIS FORM) CHECK CORRECT BOX: " NONPROFIT ORGANIZATION O CHURCH Agreement #_ I, (We), the undersigned, state that the beiow-named child care center(s) is an integral part of and therefore under the direct control and supervision of the governing body of the (Name of the Organization or Church) whose address is (Street or Route) (City) (Zip Cafe) (Teieohone Number) and that all funds relating to the Child and Adult Care Food Program will be subject to the control of the duly constituted governing body of the above-named organization or church and that all funds received for the operation of the child care center's Child and Adult Care Food Program will be used exclusively for the purpose for which they were received.The individual(s)whose name and signature appears on the reverse side of this form,is authorized to sign the Agreement and all other official documents in connec- tion with the Child & Adult Care Food Program. Name of Child Care Center(s) Address of Child Care Center(s) • 1(we) understand that the information on this form is being given in connection with the receipt of Federal funds and that ali of the provisions of the Agreement (form CACFP 300) apply. • • 1. Signature of Chair Of the BoarO of Directors Official Title for Organization or Church Print Name Date AN0/OR 2. Signature of Pastor or Executive Director of Church Official Title • Print Name Date CACFP 101 (5/90) COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CHILD AND ADULT CARE FOOD PROGRAM DONATED FOODS (COMMODITIES) ADDENDUM 65103-00 5 FANILT EDUCATION NETYOEE OF WELD COUNTY - !INUIT ?EOCEAN 520 13TH AVENUE 65103-005 Center or Sponsor N 212127, CO 80631- regiment xc The USDA Donated Foods (Commodities) Program in Colorado is administered by the Colorado Department of Social Services.The role of the Colorado Department of Health Child and Adult Care Food Program is limited to the following duties: t, Explain the choice of donated foods t0 centers or sponsors. (There are two choices). 2. Report the choice of donated foods by centers or sponsors to the Colorado Department of Social Services. 3. Reimburse centers or sponsor according to choice of donated foods. 4. Assist in monitoring the proper distribution, storage, and use of donated foods during site reviews or visits. The two choices for donated foods are:(t)regular donated commodities.or(2)cash-in-lieu of commodities.Regard- less of choice,you will receive monetary reimbursement for allowable meals served to children.Rates of reimburse- ment vary according to meal type,income category,and choice of donated foods.Please refer to your current rates of reimbursement. Choosing regular donated commodities entitles you to receive various canned,frozen,and dry foods depending on what USDA purchases for the year in addition to the regular meal reimbursement. Choosing cash-in-lieu of commodities entitles you to receive IVA cents more reimbursement for every lunch or sup- per that you claim. Every spring a survey is mailed to all Child and Adult Care Food Program centers or sponsors.At this time,you make the choice of donated foods for the next commodity year,which begins July t.This choice cannot be changed until the next spring survey. PLEASE NOTE: Ittrpu enter the Child 8 Adult Care Food Program other than during the spring survey, you can only receive cash-milieu of commodities. The Colorado Department of Social Services will send you a donated foods packet including an order form after we. the Colorado Department of Health Child&Adult Care Food Program,inform them of your participation and choice of donated foods. By signing this addendum,you are indicating that you understand its contents.If you completed the spring survey your choice Is indicated below. If you are a new Program participant, you must indicate the cash-in-lieu choice. The Center or sponor will receive: ® Regular donated commodities Cash-in-lieu of commodities (with "bonus" commodities) /l WY-amt. Sentemb_ex 5. 1990 SlOnature Of Administrator or Authorized Representative Date iv� I ATTEST: Deputy Clerk to the Board Wel con Jerk to the Board 3/90 °C0F 9 COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CHILD AND ADULT CARE FOOD PROGRAM Agreement # 6;103-004 CHILD CARE CENTER NONDISCRIMINATION POLICY STATEMENT NONPRICING CENTER OR SPONSOR t. Family Educational Network of Weld County assures the Colorado Department Nome or timer or Sponsor) of Health, Child and Adult Caro Food Program,that all enrolled children participating in the Child&Adult Care Food Program at the centers described on the application forms are served the same meals at no separate charge regardless of race,color,national origin,age,sex,or handicap,and there is no discrimination in the course of the meal service. 2. CHECK ONE ® (RENEWING CENTER OR SPONSOR) We have submitted a Press Release(sample on reverse side)to the news media(radio,television,or other) serving the area(s)from which our center or sponsor draws attendance announcing the availability of meals at no separate charge to enrolled children. ❑ (NEW CENTER OR SPONSOR) We will annually submit a Press Release(please use the sample Public Service Announcement Press Release on the reverse side)to the news media(radio,television,or other)serving the area(s)from which our center or sponsor draws attendance announcing the availability of meals at no separate charge to enrolled children. 3. We understand that we are not required by the Colorado Department of Health,Child&Adult Care Food Program to pay for publication of our Press Release.If the Press Release is sent in a form other than as a Public Service Announcement, you may be required to pay for it. 4. We will retain a copy of the Press Release sent to the media in our permanent files. 5. We have included or will send a copy of the Press Release that was sent to be published or aired indicating to whom it was sent and the date it was sent 6. We have collected actual racial/ethnic data for each child presently enrolled and have included it on the Preaward Compliance Review form.We understand that the collection of this information Is strictly for statistical reporting requirements and has no effect on the determination of the eligibility of children to receive benefits under the Program. iok 9/5/90 Signature of Administrator Date or thigh Authorized Representative �l �� ATTEST: By: Ji• • "1 t rIM Deputy C1ex3c to the Board Weld County Clerk to the Board Administrator Signature of Official of the Title Date Colorado Department of Hearth, Child & Adult Care Food Program Preer;1 CACFP 303N (5/90) PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT PRESS RELEASE (a Public Service Announcement regarding participation in the Colorado Department of Health's Child & Adult Care Food Program) The Family Educa ti anal Network of Weld County intends t0 sponsor the Child& (Name of Center Or Sponsor) Adult Care Food Program.The Same meals will be made available to all enrolled children participating in the Child& Adult Care Food Program,at no separate charge regardless of race,color,national origin,age,sex,or handicap,and there is no discrimination in the course of the meal service. If you believe that you have been treated unfairly in receiving food services for any of these reasons, write immediately to the Secretary of Agriculture. Washington, D.C. 20250. Eligibility for free and reduced meal reimbursement is based on the following income scales effective July 1, 1990 through June 30, 1991. Annual Income Family Size Free Meals Reduced Meals 1 8,164 11,618 2 10,946 15,577 3 13,728 19,536 4 16,510 23,495 5 19292 27,454 6 22.074 31,413 7 24,856 35,372 8 27,638 39.331 For each additional family member add: 2,782 3,959 Name, Address, Telephone Number and Contact Person of Each Center: Tarp Keller 520 13th Avtnite Greeley, Colorado 356-0600 Press Release Sent To:Greeley Tribune, Fanner & Miner KFKA, KVNC, KVAD Date Sent: +a,l 1�pn • • ,Al'• (.9)3''1+. Ic. ir' alit r:' 1114, 'i(:i% i COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AGREEMENT NUMBER CHILD 8 ADULT CARE F000 PROGRAM • APPUCATION FOR 65103-DOS SPONSOR OF CHILD CARE CENTERS INSTRUCTIONS: Complete in duplicate. Submit original, continuation sheets if needed and required attachments. together with CACFP 301 (AppllCatlon for Child Care Center), and attachments. Type or print Clearly, 1. NAME AND MAILING ADDRESS OF SPONSOR 6 IS THIS A pRIVATE ORGANIZATION?(Pnrete means nomgowrnmemen Family Educational Network of Weld County YES, NO X� 520 13th Avenue ON*nuns and tins of Owner of lot Prone nes XX CentwOR Cheat the Greeley, Colorado 80631 Organitatidrl C0WS.* Word. OR Clinic of the Church Gonrina Board: Chairperson TELEPHONENC:( 303 ). 356-0600 COMP grant-n(1r. Weld County Board of COUNTY- nAMe TITLE Commissioners 2 DO YOU PARTCIPATE IN THE HEAD START PROGRAM? 7, NUMBER OF CACFP•PAR ICIPATNG CENTERS UNDER YOUR AommisTRATiON YES, NOS_ - NONPROFIT CHILD CARE CENTERS - OUTa 00 volt NOW PARTICIPATE IN CR NAVE YOU PARTICIPATED IN FOR PROFIT TITLE OURS CENTERS FEDERALLY-FUNDED PROGRAMS(Including CACFP) IN THE PAST 3 FOR PRCFI7 TITLE XX CENTERS YEARS? � HEAD START CENTERS YE MICU ANT MEAD START CENTERS of'yea-give name of programs)and dates of parvC/p.tlon) a TOTAL NUMBER OF CMILOREN ENROLLED AT CACFP-PARTICIPATING CACFP 5/80 to present CENTERS UNOER YOUR ADMINISTRATION • NONPROFIT CHILD CARE CENTERS a. DO YOU PARTICIPATE IN THE COLORADO PRESCHOOL PROJECT? OUTSIDE•SCMOOL•HOURS YES—L. NO — . CENTERS 5„NAME AND TITLE QR ADMINISTRATOR. FOR PROFIT TITLE I(X Executive Director CENTERS Walter Speckman Department of Human Resources. HEAD START CENTERS Ne al* raw 410 NAME AND TITLE OF CONTACT PERSON MIGRANT HEAD START CENTERS Tere Knitnr ❑irartnr _ Name rine a 00 YOU REOUEST AOVANCE PAYMENTS? TELEPHONE NO:( 303' 356-0600 I YES_— NO •-X 10. UST ANY MONTHS WHEN YOU WILL NOT CLAIM MEALS FOR REIMBURSEMENT. DESCRIBE YOUR PROCEDURE FOR COLLECTING.MAINTAINING MVO REVIEWING THE FOLLOWING RECOROS FROM EACH CENTER • 1, income Eligibility Forma(rtq 4 Production Records - - 2 Record of Meals Sawed(ROW) IL Food Raeslpts and Invoices 3,Mono! Income eligibflity.forms. are completed at the beginning of the school year. Teachers complete'Record of Meals Served and turn in to Family Services and the information is com- piled for the Meal Claim Forms. At the beginning of the school year four menus are written and rotated changes are made accordingly. Production Records are done by the cook and reviewed by the Director monthly. Food receipts and invoices are approved by the Director and sent to the Fiscal Department for payment and recording purposes_ c3COgres CACFP-002(5/00) DESCRIBE YOUR SYSTEM FOR DISBURSING CACFP netmeuRsememrTO YOUR CENTERS MTNIN 5 DAYS OF RECIEUff FlIOm CDN{ACRV.Mein. Ouraenant Cannot nand riN CAC I,mesh dlnmell Mi mat center by tree*Denson All cneters are operated under the direction of the Family Educational Network of Weld County, therefore; the CACFP reimbursement goes to one organization and there is not a - need for disbursement. All costs are parid for under one. budget. • WILL YOU CONTRACT WITH A FOOD SERVICE MANAGEMENT COMPANY FOR MEALS? YES-- NO_IL_ If yes.Piens give Company nuns.&dent and name Ot contact parson and donne,oroceduee\ • • DESCRIBE YOUR SCHEDULE FOR TRAINING ADMINISTRATiVE AND F000 SERVICE PERSONNEL ON CACFP REQUIREMENTS fain dates of yarning sessloiS0 en0 repos ro be coveted; I Family Educational Network of Weld County staff - (kitchen, teaching, health and admini- strativ) will attend CACFP trainings. as they are scheduled. • DESCRIBE YOUR PROCEDURE FOR CONDUCTING PRE-APPROVAL VISITS TO NEW CENTERS.IF AVAILABLE.ATTACH A COPY OF YOUR PREAP- PROVAL EVALUATION FORM. The pre-evaluation/site visit form will be used for each site. PROvme A SCHEDULE FOR MONITORING FOOD SE/.R�V/I.CE OPERATIONS ATYOUR CENTERS Each Oki owe center must be manitond•�t�M�eat�2�yth�en�� each year,InClYdlng odes during the plat slit weeks of CACre odaratbit Menem an canine be moll Ulan Mee MOmha Sit.EMI,OVHIQFaOfwOM OWS Center NW be monitoted of least d flow err ynI Including once during the WO month of CACFP opNedpa Times mews cannot be more Oen Mtn months site', - • .• Monitoring will)occur..,in .November 1990, February 1991 and May.1991. ' . . .it • .. . If prONr+•+ro discovered dunng•mon tdnng review,what erectly*rectly*WLrd Oun wig you fdlWf The proper component will be advised of any problem and they will have 30 days for correction. CACFP-102(3/00) Page 2 SFONS, STAFFING PATTERN FOR CACFP list all WONKY perednntl w110 Will ne midst,in adm nitionnp Ins CACFP in the,chart Dhow.Como** chart as apeqdled,recording duties of peteofllNl head in AommisTRArive tunes WLottyrelatsd to the CACFP.Administrative duties ineluesmana0up finanC]S and 00eratren Of CACFP,Attach additional streets d ne0esaatyl SALARY PER HOUR NUMBER OF INCLUDING DAYS PER NUMBER OF FRINGE YEAR EACH SOURCE OF NUMBER OF HOURS PER DAY BENEFITS EMPLOYEE FUNDS FOR ANNUAL POSITION SPECIFIC CACFP PERSONNEL EACH EMPLOYEE (MOW*w/umen WILL SPEND SALARY CACFPFUNDED DUTIES IN THIS WILL SPENO ON and unpaid work ON CACFP (CACFP d) SALARY POSITION CACFP DUTIES with*V 7 DUTIES orhar/ ONLY ( A a C 0 E F 0 (oxexr) ADMINISTRATOR ' !Of epurvaanrl ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR ll l0/aOurvalanrl CLERICAL (or equivalent) COOK OTHER ispeclfyl G ANNUAL CACFP ADMINISTRATIVE BUDGET • ATOTAL CACFP-FUNDED LABOR S�^� (ENTER CACFP PORTION ONLY) CACFP-FUNDED LABOR (Enter total tram @Dow) S OFFICE SUPPLIES(Including reproduction costs) POSTAGE TRANSPORTATION FOR FACILITY MONITORING(include mileage multiplied by 200) TELEPHONE OFFICE RENTAL/MORTGAGE PAYMENT AND MAINTENANCE UTILITIES FOR OFFICE AREA OTHER(Speqdy) TOTAL CACFP ADMINISTRATIVE BUDGET S 0 ANNUAL CACFP BUDGET FOR FOOD SERVICE OPERATIONS AT FACILITIES UNDER YOUR ADMINISTRATION (ENTER CACFP PORTION ONLY) FOOD PURCHASES S 52,300 F000 SERVICE LABOR(Station of sad prepanrrp or serving meals) 29 926 FOOD SERVICE CONTRACTOR FEE 0 NONF000 SUPPLIES(Napiona straw&dishwashing detergent,etc) 4,250 MAINTENANCE FOR FOOD PREPARATION,STORAGE AND SERVICE AREAS _ 0 RENT/MORTGAGE PAYMENT FOR FOOD PREPARATION,STORAGE ANO SERVICE AREA$ •653 UTILITIES 0 OTHER!Specify) p TOTAL FOOD SERVICE OPERATING BUDGET LIST SOURCE$OF CASH INCOME SPECIFICALLY FOR 111E FOOD SERVICE OTHER THAN CACFP REIMBURSEMENT. nne,~s /cenlly that the information on this application and the attached"./otm CACFP]Ot is true tothopestamyknOwledge;that twill accept final admiMaatlwand financial responsibility for total Child and Adult Cate F000 PIOOam Opfirafi0na at all Conant Under MySpOnaOahipt anti that relmouaement SU De claimed Only fat meals sealed tO enrolled participants;that the CACFP wig Oe ennoble t0 all NINON panici nre without regard to ra0e.CObr,DeA national Ong/n,1414 Or hand/Cap at the a0DrOved food Service facilities and that these.loci a haw Me.c Dility f r Me moat servte•planned for ran number of panlcipana anticipated to De served or mealsaro prowdod Dya food service ma nee ny o mewl CACFP reguational understand Mat MlsinfOrma- tiOn rsOemg given in cOnnectiOn with Moreceipt of Federal fundsand a doll em 14 tattoo aysubioct mero prosecution und«apaivae Sae sod*Jonal criminal st�atat�,/ ...0V4/75.4" / iu � ATTEST: rlri Crnmfy Clerk t0 Be3rd 9/5/90 SIGMA URE OF ADMINISTRATOR OR AUTNOR12_ED REPRESENTATIVE DATE CACFP$02(3/90) By �� L(j t`` K , f LI Le Page 7 Deputy Cl, rk to the Board AUDIT QUESTIONNAYRE • Family Educational Network of Weld County Agreementr]umbQ; 65103-005 Akinfi 520 13th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 1. Do you have an audit done of your center? Yes x No If so, is it an organization-wide audit? Yes x No Is CACFP included is your organization-wide audit? Yes_ x No The term"organization-wide audit"meats an audit of all funds received by an organiza- tion, inclusive of federal,state,local,and private funds. The audit must include a random sampling of all federal funds received by the institution, and it must be conducted by an independent auditor. 2. If Yes,what is the correct name of the organization bcing audited? (For example,-. Mile High Child Care) Weld County 3. When does your center's fiscal year begin and end? a miary 1st through December 31st 4. What federal funds does your center receive other than CACFP? • (For example, Title XX —55,000) Head Start _s 600,000 Migrant Head Start _s 600,000 • • _s _s 5. What is the total annual budget for all programs in your organization(including all federal,state, and"other" funds)? 1,500,000 6. Does your center have fiscal year end schedules? Yes X No (financial statements) 7. Does your center have computerized records? Yes X No Questionnaire preperrrdby: Tere Keller Title: Director Phone Number. 356-0600 Rev.6/70 �'C 13; fart, MEMORRE1DUM Gene R. Br, Chairman Coun y To Board of Coun y Commissioners o,,, September 5, 1990 eat COLORADO From Walter J. Speckman, Executive Director, Human Resources eat sawct. Purchase of Services Agreements between the Weld County Division of Human Resources' Family Educational Network and four (4) dentists Enclosed for Board approval are four (4) Purchase of Services Agreements between Weld County Division of Human Resources' Family Educational Network and four (4) local dentists. The dental agreements outline that the dentists will provide dental ser- vices for FENWC children. FENWC will reimburse the dentists as follows: 1. Robert Kron, D.D.S., $45.00 per child up to a maximum of six (6) children. 2. Peter Thompson, D.D.S., $40.00 per child up to a maximum of to thirty (30) children. 3. Gilbert H. Sydney, D.D.S., $40.00 to $100.30 per child up to a maximum of ten (10) children. 4. Dwaine D. Kurtz, D.D.S. , $40.00 per child up to a maximum of ten (10) children. The terms of these Agreements are from October 1, 1990 through June 30, 1991. 1f you have any questions, please telephone Tere Keller at 356-0600. September 5, 1990 MEMORANDUM FR: Clerk Orton the Board FR: Jane Orton . RE: Purchase of Servi s Agreements between Weld County Division of Human Resources' Family Educational Network and four (4) dentists Enclosed for Board approval are three (3) copies of each of the four (4) Purchase of Services Agreements as stated above. Please return two (2) copies of each of the four (4) Agreements once they have been signed. 1f you have any questions, please telephone Tere Keller at 356-0600. 900817 koo4/3 • PURCHASE OF SERVICE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 5th day of September 1990, by and between the County of Weld, State of Colorado, by and through the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, on behalf of the Weld County Division of Human Resources' Family Educational Network of Weld County, hereinafter referred to as "FENWC," and Dwaine D. Kurtz, D.D.S., hereinafter referred to as "Dentist." WITNESSETH In consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, FENWC and the Dentist agree as follows: 1. FENWC agrees to arrange transportation for FENWC children to the appointed dentist as needed. This will enable parents to be transported with their children to attend their child's scheduled appointment at the designated Dentist's office. 2. The Dentist shall provide prophylaxis therapy and application of topical fluoride for each FENWC child. The Dentist agrees to provide all restoration and/or extractions as he deems necessary on each referred child. 3. FENWC agrees to reimburse the Dentist $40.00 per child for these services up to a maximum of ten (10) children. 4. FENWC will not be charged for those children covered by Public Assistance. Medicaid numbers shall be provided at the time of the appointment and billing will be sent to the appropriate agency by the Dentist. S. For services not reimbursed by FENWC, the amount will be designated as 1n-Kind Contribution to the FENWC Program on behalf of the Dentist. ac©33 6. The term of the Agreement is October 1, 1990 through June 30, 1991. 7. The Dentist and FENWC mutually agree that this Agreement will terminate on June 30, 1991. 8. The Dentist assures the following that: a. He is an independent contractor and neither he nor his officers and employees become employees of Weld County, and therefore are not entitled to any employee benefits as Weld County employees, as the result of the execution of this Agreement. b. Weld County, the Board of County Commissioners o£ Weld County, its officers and employees, shall not be held liable for injuries or damages caused by any negligent acts or omissions of the Dentist, or his employees, volunteers, or agents while performing Dentist's duties as described in this Agreement. The Dentist shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless Weld County, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, its officers and employees for any loss occasioned as a result of the performance of this Agreement by the Dentist, his employees, volunteers, and agents. c. No portion of this Agreement shall be deemed to constitute a waiver of any immunities the parties or their officers or employees may possess, nor shall any portion of this Agreement be deemed to have created a duty of care with respect to any persons not a party to this Agreement. QC 81g d. No portion of this Agreement shalt be deemed to create an obligation on the part of the County of Weld, State of Colorado, to expend funds not otherwise appropriated in each succeeding year. e. No officer, member, or employee of Weld County, and no member of their governing bodies shall have any pecuniary interest, direct, or indirect in the approved Agreement or the proceeds thereof. 9. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Agreement is for any reason held or decided to be unconstitutional , such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions. The parties hereto declare that they would have entered into this Agreement and each and every section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, and phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more • sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, or phrases might be declared unconstitutional or invalid. 10. All modifications to this Agreement shall be in writing and signed by both parties. 11. This Agreement may be terminated by either party giving a thirty (30) day written notice to the other party. If funding to fENWC should cease, this Agreement will be terminated immediately. If fENWC funding should be reduced, this Agreement will be renegotiated immediately to reflect funding changes. SICOS175 y 12. This Agreement constitutes the entire understanding between the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof, and may not be changed or modified except as stated in Paragraph ten (10) herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties above hereunto placed their hands as of the date first written above. WELD CO NTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS DEN T ene . rantner, airman a ne . u z . . . WELD COUNTY DIVISION OF HUMAN ATTEST: RESOURCES WELD COUN 7 �d� Walter S By: t.x��" .7/�� rli Executive Director Deputy C�Erk to the and 9CC9 *. PURCHASE OF SERVICE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 5th day of September 1990, by and between the County of Weld, State of Colorado, by and through the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, on behalf of the Weld County Division of Human Resources' Family Educational Network of Weld County, hereinafter referred to as "FENWC," and Gilbert H. Sydney D.D.S. , hereinafter referred to as "Dentist." WITNESSETH In consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, FENWC and the Dentist agree as follows: 1. FENWC agrees to arrange transportation for FENWC children to the appointed dentist as needed. This will enable parents to be transported with their children to attend their child's scheduled appointment at the designated Dentist's office. 2. The Dentist shall provide prophylaxis therapy and application of topical fluoride for each FENWC child. The Dentist agrees to provide all restoration and/or extractions as he deems necessary on each referred child. • 3. FENWC agrees to reimburse the Dentist $40.00 to $100.00 per child for these services up to a maximum of ten (10) children. 4. FENWC will not be charged for those children covered by Public Assistance. Medicaid numbers shall be provided at the time of the appointment and billing will be sent to the appropriate agency by the Dentist. 5. For services not reimbursed by FENWC, the amount will be designated as In-Kind Contribution to the FENWC Program on behalf of the Dentist. 9009 w 6. The term of the Agreement is October 1, 1990 through June 30, 1991. 7. The Dentist and FENWC mutually agree that this Agreement will terminate on June 30, 1991. 8. The Dentist assures the following that: a. He is an independent contractor and neither he nor his officers and employees become employees of Weld County, and therefore are not entitled to any employee benefits as Weld County employees, as the result of the execution of this Agreement. b. Weld County, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, its officers and employees, shall not be held liable for injuries or damages caused by any negligent acts or omissions of the Dentist, or his employees, volunteers, or agents while performing Dentist's duties as described in this Agreement. The Dentist shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless Weld County, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, its officers and employees for any loss occasioned as a result of the performance of this Agreement by the Dentist, his employees, volunteers, and agents. c. No portion of this Agreement shall be deemed to constitute a waiver of any immunities the parties or their officers or employees may possess, nor shall any portion of this Agreement be deemed to have created a duty of care with respect to any persons not a party to this Agreement. C0g1,; d. No portion of this Agreement shall be deemed to create an obligation on the part of the County of Weld, State of Colorado, to expend funds not otherwise appropriated in each succeeding year. e. No officer, member, or employee of Weld County, and no member of their governing bodies shall have any pecuniary interest, direct, or indirect in the approved Agreement or the proceeds thereof. 9. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Agreement is for any reason held or decided to be unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions. The parties hereto declare that they would have entered into this Agreement and each and every section, subsection, paragraph. sentence. clause, and phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, or phrases might be declared unconstitutional or invalid. 10. All modifications to this Agreement shall be in writing and signed by both parties. 11. This Agreement may be terminated by either party giving a thirty (30) day written notice to the other party. If funding to FENWC should cease, this Agreement will be terminated immediately. If FENWC funding should be reduced, this Agreement will be renegotiated immediately to reflect funding changes. OGOC:1^ 12. This Agreement constitutes the entire understanding between the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof, and may not be changed or modified except as stated in Paragraph ten (10) herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties above hereunto placed their hands as of the date first written above. WELD COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS DENTIST 6ri�� e�ne rantner, airman G�lbe t H. S ne � WELD COUNTY DIVISION OF HUMAN ATTEST: Ad% RESOURCES WELD COUNTY CLERK TO THE BOARD Walter 3! pS eKman By: Executive Director eputy r to t e oard nCOCI.P+ I � PURCHASE OF SERVICE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 5th day of September 1990, by and between the County of Weld, State of Colorado, by and through the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, on behalf of the weld County Division of Human Resources' Family Educational Network of Weld County, hereinafter referred to as "FENWC," and Peter Thompson, D.D.S. , hereinafter referred to as "Dentist." WITNESSETH In consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, FENWC and the Dentist agree as follows: 1. FENWC agrees to arrange transportation for FENWC children to the appointed dentist as needed. This will enable parents to be transported with their children to attend their child's scheduled appointment at the designated Dentist's office. 2. The Dentist shall provide prophylaxis therapy and application of topical fluoride for each FENWC child. The Dentist agrees to provide all restoration and/or extractions as he deems necessary on each referred child. 3. FENWC agrees to reimburse the Dentist $40.00 per child for these services up to a maximum of thirty (30) children. 4. FENWC will not be charged for those children covered by Public Assistance. Medicaid numbers shall be provided at the time of the appointment and billing will be sent to the appropriate agency by the Dentist. 5. For services not reimbursed by FENWC, the amount will be designated as In-Kind Contribution to the FENWC Program on behalf of the Dentist. QCegg , 6. The term of the Agreement is October 1, 1990 through June 30, 1991. 7. The Dentist and FENWC mutually agree that this Agreement will terminate on June 30, 1991. 8. The Dentist assures the following that: a. He is an independent contractor and neither he nor his officers and employees become employees of Weld County, and therefore are not entitled to any employee benefits as Weld County employees, as the result of the execution of this Agreement. b. Weld County, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, its officers and employees, shall not be held liable for injuries or damages caused by any negligent acts or omissions of the Dentist, or his employees, volunteers, or agents while performing Dentist's duties as described in this Agreement. The Dentist shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless Weld County, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, its officers and employees for any loss occasioned as a result of the performance of this Agreement by the Dentist, his employees, volunteers, and agents. c. No portion of this Agreement shalt be deemed to constitute a waiver of any immunities the parties or their officers or employees may possess, nor shall any portion of this Agreement be deemed to have created a duty of care with respect to any persons not a party to this Agreement. Of°C d. No portion of this Agreement shall be deemed to create an obligation on the part of the County of Weld, State of Colorado, to expend funds not otherwise appropriated in each succeeding year. e. No officer, member, or employee of Weld County, and no member of their governing bodies shall have any pecuniary interest, direct, or indirect in the approved Agreement or the proceeds thereof. 9. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Agreement is for any reason held or decided to be unconstitutional , such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions. The parties hereto declare that they would have entered into this Agreement and each and every section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, and phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, or phrases might be declared unconstitutional or invalid. 10. All modifications to this Agreement shall be in writing and signed by both parties. 11. This Agreement may be terminated by either party giving a thirty (30) day written notice to the other party. If funding to FENWC should cease, this Agreement will be terminated immediately. If FENWC funding should be reduced, this Agreement will be renegotiated immediately to reflect funding changes. C41R1: . II 12. This Agreement constitutes the entire understanding between the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof, and may not be changed or modified except as stated in Paragraph ten (10) herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties above hereunto placed their hands as of the date first written above. WELD C UNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS DENTI T n X .hp1 /� f e e . rantne , airman Peter 1 ompson, D 0.S. WELD COUNTY DIVISION OF HUMAN ATTEST: M1/24 RESOURCES //v��jj WELD COUNTY CLERK TO THE BOARD Ralter l�e� By: air 7� c��1/t� Executive Director Depuerk to the Board h $'C i9, ti PURCHASE OF SERVICE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 5th day of September 1990, by and between the County of Weld, State of Colorado, by and through the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, on behalf of the Weld County Division of Human Resources' Family Educational Network of Weld County, hereinafter referred to as "FENWC," and Robert Kron, D.D.S. , hereinafter referred to as "Dentist." WITNESSETH In consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, FENWC and the Dentist agree as follows: 1. FENWC agrees to arrange transportation for FENWC children to the appointed dentist as needed. This will enable parents to be transported with their children to attend their child's scheduled appointment at the designated Dentist's office. 2. The Dentist shall provide prophylaxis therapy and application of topical fluoride for each FENWC child. The Dentist agrees to provide all restoration and/or extractions as he deems necessary on each referred child. 3. FENWC agrees to reimburse the Dentist $45.00 per child for these services up to a maximum of six (6) children. 4. FENWC will not be charged for those children covered by Public Assistance. Medicaid numbers shall be provided at the time of the appointment and billing will be sent to the appropriate agency by the Dentist. 5. For services not reimbursed by FENWC, the amount will be designated as In-Kind Contribution to the FENWC Program on behalf of the Dentist. 5.,C 0c 1, 6. The term of the Agreement is October 1, 1990 through June 30, 1991. 7. The Dentist and FENWC mutually agree that this Agreement will terminate on June 30, 1991. 8. The Dentist assures the following that: a. He is an independent contractor and neither he nor his officers and employees become employees of Weld County, and therefore are not entitled to any employee benefits as Weld County employees, as the result of the execution of this Agreement. b. Weld County, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, its officers and employees, shall not be held liable for injuries or damages caused by any negligent acts or omissions of the Dentist, or his employees, volunteers, or agents while performing Dentist's duties as described in this Agreement. The Dentist shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless Weld County, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, its officers and employees for any loss occasioned as a result of the performance of this Agreement by the Dentist, his employees, volunteers, and agents. c. No portion of this Agreement shall be deemed to constitute a waiver of any immunities the parties or their officers or employees may possess, nor shall any portion of this Agreement be deemed to have created a duty of care with respect to any persons not a party to this Agreement. SC®c:a d. No portion of this Agreement shall be deemed to create an obligation on the part of the County of Weld, State of Colorado, to expend funds not otherwise appropriated in each succeeding year. e. No officer, member, or employee of Weld County, and no member of their governing bodies shall have any pecuniary interest, direct, or indirect in the approved Agreement or the proceeds thereof. 9. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Agreement is for any reason held or decided to be unconstitutional , such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions. The parties hereto declare that they would have entered into this Agreement and each and every section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, and phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, or phrases might be declared unconstitutional or invalid. 10. All modifications to this Agreement shall be in writing and signed by both parties. 11. This Agreement may be terminated by either party giving a thirty (30) day written notice to the other party. If funding to FENWC should cease, this Agreement will be terminated immediately. If FENWC funding should be reduced, this Agreement will be renegotiated immediately to reflect funding changes. 12. This Agreement constitutes the entire understanding between the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof, and may not be changed or modified except as stated in Paragraph ten (10) herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties above hereunto placed their hands as of the date first written above. WELD C UNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS DEN / GenetBO� Brantner, airman Robert ron, . . . /( WELD COUNTY OF HUMAN ATTEST: z i �j��RESOURCES WELD COUNTY CLERK TO THE BOARD Walter . peckman By: S Executive Director Deputy C reto the uoard e,f ieg?k WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PAGE 1 GENERAL FUND CLAIMS V.O. WARRANT NO. P.O. NO. _ VENDOR AMOUNT 902445 102390 BETTY HENDRICKSON 520.00 TOTAL t 520.00 STATE OF COLORADO COUNTY OF WELD ss This is to certify that all accounting and budgeting procedures have been completed on the above listed claims as shown on Pages 1 through and dated SEPTEMBER 5th , 19 4n and that payments should be made to the respective vendors in the amounts set opposite their names with the total amount $ 520.00 DATED THIS 5th DAY OF AUGUST , 19 90 • WE U Y , AN CEP SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS sth , DAY OF AUGUST 19 90. MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: e- — • STATE OF COLORADO ) V COUNTY OF WELD )) 55 We, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, hereby (approve) disapprove) the claims as set forth above; and war ants in payment therefore are hereby ordered drawn upon the GENERAL FU otalliing $ ,A1 yalrppperrsoonn ilylifiliateh Mem eb rATTEST: 9 71,-tWdL,? count' CLERK TO 1rix BOARD Memb r BY: vitlet A` ✓� ( ,!a ehiL N�.z .ns . � /�,L�sy�� Deputy 0 der Member WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PAGE 1 • • PAYROLL FUND CLAIMS V.O. WARRANT N0. P.O. N0. VENDOR AMOUNT 015251 UNITED BANK OF GREELEY 3,05l.Au 015252 COLORADO DEPT. OF REVENUE 54,772.83 015253 UNITED BANK OF GREELEY 416,722.20- 015249 PEAK HEALTH 916.76 015250 WELD COUNTY REVOLVING FUND 129.84 290 SEMI-MONTHLY CHECKS ii 71,87L.45 5 TOTAL 547,465.26 STATE OF COLORADO ) COUNTY OF WELD )) 55 This is to certify that all accounting and budgeting procedures have been completed on the above listed claims as shown on Pages 1 through and dated SEPTEMBER 5 , 19 90 and that payments should be made to the respective vendors in the amounts set opposite their names with the total amount $ 547,465.26 . DATED THIS 5TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER , 19 90 . WE/dad�'/ SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS 5TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1990 . I MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: 4-2 -49+V STATE OF COLORADO ) • COUNTY OF WELD )) ss We, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, hereby (approve) disapprove) the claims as set forth above; and a rants in payment therefore are hereby ordered drawn upon the PAYROLL totaling 7,465 26 . V C erson ATTEST: Sea% Mem er WELD COUNTY CLERK TO-THE BOARD Mem ��/!t / BY: � 0 � Ple/r.) �,e. f- De'puty em er Member • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • b b D •b. M •+ 2 D p a u `w u w u u w C A ro V V V V V V V = A O ✓ 0 +0 0 +0 � +0 to D 10 +0 0 0 Co n -- O. A u N O Co Co A =4 a a a b O 9 c -' m b z s - b c O o r. r -c o c -i -i x ro m r L D T n C r N .. D r i T b S Z A C C n 0 0 '0 C C r o ✓ a - o •4 n r r r z b c A m r ^ r o z r r. L -. b Z ✓ n. K N -i C 7 N O 1) r n r h .-rig r b = C r K b o A = •, n r ozm , r m b r m z o .. y M n L2 3 V N in 71 O O N OOOO (7OOO O z - OAO P .. N N •. Is A W a N 0 N N P P P P P P P P C C 10 n N O P Cr, 0O NO •'• N0PWO OAt.: N NrrO = 0 \ n ' O P A a C N O 0: A V P 41 r 0 u N N 10 P O L, b G+ •. Op. IO •' NV C. +0 +0 s N 0 0 CO V � VN •-• NN +0 Co rn n ANK O 0 0 0 OTC, 01 P b5D > b bbb A m dm O A O 0 0 0 0 0 N N P 00000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T r r r r 1- r N N !l r r P b I 1 1 1 ; 1 11 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 n •+ N N r t+ r N L'. •.. 0 n O +0 000 O P v •• OOOOO OOOOOOOO m O P +0 0+ P P C •- •- ,C P P P P P P P P P P P P P b C M. p r r r r O O I . °' ~ -4 Z I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 N P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P 0, P P O W U u u u u u u N N N N N N u u u W u L! L.! L: to .- P V P P P P N N W NNNNN P P 00 P P O P L a- 0 O 0000 N N P N N V P O 00004700o O O 0 0 0 0 � I I I I : 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 '0 Oa n h n h h h n n n n n n n z r n n one n n n n n n n n ` A t 1 11 I I -tO 1 1 11 1 1 › X> 1 I 11 1 1 O -4 I I It 1 1 n m 1 t it 1 I I t II 1 1 .. I I II t I = t I 11 1 I I A A O I f..' u � •• r N N lee 0: U 11 Cr N 1 u 1 N , A V O I •• A A A •+ a 1 A U O 11 .C +L 1 V V V 4.I V V t r r •- N W l: N (.I P. O A "*. V I P P A A A 00 I W N V II •- r 10 N 0 N N N I 0+ A 10 Co u N 'OW P C b O • I • 1 • 1 • • • • • 1 . • • II • 1 • • • • • • I • • • • • . . • • 7 -. A N I A I A 10 O O O a I P 0, +0 II •• ^ I .-. GI V V rI V 1 W O A O N P C.1 P S 1 G IA I A I O 0000 10 co N u 0 P 10 00000 t O A NA N P 0700 I I I 1 It 1 I •. 0 ± • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1 • • • • • • • • 0 A b b a a 3 D a a L X t n r r r n n n n Z A A W W W W y W (J (4 W 41 C A "i3 a: Co Co O V V V V V V 3 A N O O O O 10 10 (0 0 0 0 Co A O O O O O IG C IO 10 10 .0 M Z O W N •- O `O 6 V a 0 a X H V A n n n n n n n n a b C O a a r r r .. C a r r r r D a -1 C ❑ -C r O O C 1 N A -C X O in .. -I X M N X n rn r^ -1 ?e a 1 ` n n M -. r* o c m — c a n r a o T c n r ❑ z A _ s A — n o rn n r rr, C. r C n O A N n n r r .+ n ti X r R N N R C 3 X n n - A r, K N n n a n n - s - n 0 -1 N N C X N •. X M V O O •• .. A a r 7 r n •• N C N A r H H ZI X { •• n OxM o r.. ryl ' r n T 3 O •- y r n O a s O V N O 01 O 4 a " O A O O W W k O a O N O P C C 10 n C O V V a -I Co .. W n 0 3 O \ n 2 a .0 0 N N 0J V n V V CO In Oh. n( 10 W 14 N O a O a O W M n a N K O (n a w 1: P N w A r \ .4 .0 n O A V O O O •- N O O o 01 M O n n n 10 N .- n r N C A I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 I n .• n .- n a N •- N V O n O O O O •- N •- •. N to G n a P e V .- N n N � S C a n •- O O W n W O M 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 .4 O Cr• b N 0 C. 0 0' P 0 O N N W W u 01 W N {.I C 2 ✓ f.I W O. W N V V 10 W C. C W 0 Cr O 0 h b O 0 V 3 1 1 1 1 1 V P n n n M -( A n n n n A c r 2 I_ O 11 II I I I I 11 11 L C II 11 I I 1 1 11 11 A A II II 1 1 1 1 11 I n -V II II I I I I II I rrI in i I I I I I II •- •• I I I I II 1 E I I I I I II I A a O 10 AN I I I I II I 7, A .0 n le 10 P a a N N I 4. (.. I n n i a t I P Y 11 V V I N O A O I W C N O O O O 10 Vi I W Ir I r 4. 1 •• II O O I V C A O • 1 • • I • I • 1 a • I • a 1 • • 11 • 1 I a I%. I Go 0. O O O 1 O O IN IN I O O IN N II- .- 11 0 1 0 1 N -• M � O IC" 0 O O O 1 O O I IA I 0` I O O ICI O la a 11 0 1 0 I a IO 1 I I 1 I I I 11 1 I N O • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ei • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • e a a a a a a a A a Z IC ia •- at a A G Cal IJ w t U U u G C A 9 CD C C CO C ¢ a co m a S N o 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 o C7 a o a. .. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m : 0 o O 0 V C N l W Z -4 9 a S X' C • K CI A C a c 37. t 711 `Z r K r x • a n r r m p ti• n 0 .. in m N ., C N an t T r, at ca r. 0 • r • n t b rn . r r v z 9 a • _r c d Q ^ C r r r n S C r V. •• K L C 01 2c n M Z b H 71 34 m ti Z c n z r H A 0 2 a N C tr r• N r a C .. 0 a 73z O1 C x r• III a A Z C .. y .- A O O o .+ •• .. 0000 O V O - - or O O a •47C•N N O .O .O •D .D `C . O C C O m .• w O a 0) o w w u c: •• iC •• s c w r, Z P as t I N W P VI a u P t V C) .• O N -I 01 O V3 l V V V O IT n ♦ 0 K .C O O t •. •. a •• .O M \ a i43 M O Z O O V O O a 00000 N O en 1 •. N r O a 1 1 1 1 ,1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 A ta as ta .- .- 0 CI .- O n o r o o r 0 0 0 0 O N m C N t .C PP V PO. 0PP •- N 9 C Cl M pa N •• O r O W •I Z 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 N P P CO P P P P P P a a P P O O W r W CA Ca W t t U W N tst to a L' V l PP C 0000 a N 'C t C .C O V O o CI 00000 O C C 11 I 1 1 1 1 1 9 n n 9 n n n n n r IT n n n n n n n O S t • II 11 I 11 II II 11 11 11 9 O II II I 1. II 11 11 II 11 a a II 11 1 II 11 II II 11 11 O V 11 11 1 11 11 II 11 11 11 rn rr It 1 I 11 it II 11 II 11 11 1 I 11 11 II 11 11 It •. •• II 1 I it 11 11 11 II 11 r II 1 I 11 II 11 11 II 11 D Z P 11 I a •' I 11 Ii 11 V N 1^ II 11 II t A b II N N ICJ CI 1 .O .O II ID C. l II II •O P P 0 P ea. 11 r .+ 11 .+ .- li .- G .T. \ 11 A V. II-. I-. IQ, P II CI VC. II ♦ l II P O N .O O N it V V It N N li O 0 r O 11 • • I • • I • • II • • • 11 • • 11 • ♦ 11 • • It • • 11 • $ -. l Oa IA la a I O O 11 N N O tl N V 11 C• O N O O o 11 N N 11 a a li N "I -1 P... 11O O 1O O 10 O JIM C O HO O 110 O O O 0 O 11 C CO ION N it O .O II I I II 11 It It 11 11 t O • • • • • ♦ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • el a D a D D D u z .. r ✓ .. Z D D Q C.: G 2 Cc W 3 77 77 N O O O O O O c D O ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ r .- T 2 O V c. P ♦ W N O -i b r, c, n a n b 1.1 z z m o o D 0 n m r z )2 -c r R n c b f1 'm r r o c r n r. ^n z H -C •C .t N 4 O s b r r o si o D c r n M 0 C 4-- c a ` N N O .• In. C n C D X C• O 7 b r a1 n 2 n -c D O 77 -4 Ds I. N D - F r n O z r roar 2c .. -4 M n Cr C L: W W W Co: J J ♦ O C V ✓ O Z 7 O 73 O N ✓ P PCPPC 0W V N N N W .• O O C C drC el d N N N ✓ O N C.: P N O O P N N ✓ S O \ O 2 O 1D V V N CO ✓ V N O N ✓ P V UN P Cm O r N O O N . . P ♦ V W O O d 10 N d r n t N -C ✓ Co d f4 CJ O ✓ 27 r \•1 d 1.” O 73 O O C0000 O O O N N N N N (11 N P N V! N N V O 00 O '41 N ✓ ✓ N N N NNNNNNNNNNINNN ✓ b D 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 : 1 1 n e to VIN O 0000001000000. 411 ✓ O n O O OOOOO NN N NN OV1O N 0P NONO N ✓ at O r- N P P P P• P ✓ ✓ ✓ J. N as. 0 J. N ✓ ♦ •• P r ♦ es, N S C O O ✓ O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W N 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 .4 P P Cr P P P P P P P' P P P P P P P P P P P Cr P Cr O N N W W (.: G.; W 41 W W N W W N N W W N W N W N W N O at N N P P P P P P P P NNNNNNNNNNNNINJ NO L C O W 00000 U. V. U d N N d d N N d N d N .E N %a 2 II 1 1 1 b (c n n n n n x ro n n n n n O A L I I l I 11 II V C I I I I 11 I D D 1 1 1 1 11 I 0 el I I 1 1 Ii 1 T. 0 I 1 1 1 11 I 1 1 I II 1 .. •• 1 1 I 11 N 1 X 1 I 1 II � I. O D O 1 I N 1 N ✓ II Cr. 1- V1 V W •• N N it S S NO I N N N N 0: N P A 0 t I ♦ Cr P GI 11 N -.1 1-1 a7 1-' O N •17 W N r• NON 11 ✓ r- O F \ 1 o p ♦ ♦ W O 4. 4. 0 I W ✓ N O 11 M r O. N P O V1 d P m O im. N 0 ;IL W C D O I • a • 1 • • • • 1 a • II • • • a • • • • • • • • 11 • • Z 2 • 1 N N 0 1 0 ♦ O 1• P W 4! I P 000 It O rl 1G ♦ ✓ ✓ a• 10 .400304.10 11 ♦ ♦ —1 •y I CO C 0 1 0 P OO P O ♦ 1 O O O O 11 Cr ♦ V P V V * W d N0 -400 11 P P d I 1 1 11 U ♦ O 0 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • is -1. • • • o • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • D b b b D b D b D i S pn r 1• IS Y 1• P. r M 2 b b W W W W W W W W W C M 1, a a a a m a a a a 2 X N O O O O O O O O O CO D O N N N N N no N A r m G . P P A W N O 10 d w d b ✓ r r r 7 7 7 i` L t r .. D D O m I C D D VI C 1 - a n K ti N 0 it D D m 7 m (n O m n N y o • r _ n _ K P I y r • -V 0 n D D O .. c C C r r O b an r b ' m b r Ir. A ft r r -1b r r t. C . C m r f1 sa r m c z • K -4 m r b r N A A X 0S7m 17X. r X e. y r n r O O O W a 0000 O O 72 0700 I N W co r.c. V O 000o O o a a c c W rn c Li W 1D O a a r r ► r W 17,7 S O \ 0 2. o r W o V Cr. P a w a r o •+ a S S 0 a N a COP A r r Z 111 .3/4. K K O r r O O In) O F e O O V V O 1• O O O O O O T N r r ,q 1O r 0 r r r w r r O D 1 1 I 11 1 1 11 1 1 I I n e r r r A is r r r r r r r O n r r r r r O O m •.1 • r A r r P V NININN A a -0 C O r r O O w O WWWW •• •, ti Z 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 •1 Cr. P P P P P P P P P P P P O W W I„I r r N W 0000 W W C 2 W Al V A A W P 1O b it O V % L C ✓ O O V W a o 1D 16 O VD O O S I 1 L O In v x n n ` F 1 11 I II 11 I 11 II II S C I 11 I 11 II I 11 I II b b I II I II 11 I 11 1 II n .4 I II I I, 11 I 11 1 b PI RI 1 11 1 itb 1 11 I II 1 ❑ 1 tl II { 0 I I I A se 1 11 1 1 It 1 II I II X I 11 I I 11 1 11 1 11 D A O 1 II N N 1 W W 1 P r •" it I 11 A Ps N 1 r r 11 •. t- 3 A 10 I N N u P. r 1 V V 1 N WO It V V 1 r- r U N V •.. A r 1 ft N 11 V V 0 71 \ lc) O • V V 10 P 10 co II A A 10 N 11 W P V A A 1 W W u 1J W C A O 1 • • 11 • • I • • I • • • 11 • • 1 • • II • 1 • • • • I • • II • 1 • Z Z r I 1[ 1C 11 P P 10 O IN 0N lie P 10 O 11 Ce I a V co A 1 a a II a l a H r 1 V N II O O 10 O IC O P b o O 10 O 11 •42 I P N P 0 IA A no 1 0 b 1 11 1 1 11 I 11 1 I II 1 0 O • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • -IIII a D a D b a D D a e x .. .. .- r r nc r r Z D D u u u 41 4: 41 41 u u C 7C c O CO CO CO O CO CO Co O S fi N O O o O O o O O O C D O W W 41 W 41 41 N N N m 2 O C" a 41 N r O .0 CO V r N V ro 'o o z s r r r t I c .. PI c D D e n C D ✓ r -( n -1 n n = c K ,.., b m _� .. 3 D C D m y Iy -" O H In a 7_ m r1 D m — r .. C n ... r T. D r e c _D r r D C x t r t r z c c x x n n n s 0 o x m .1 c n t z N co ✓ N r r O C r N 4i O O O to 0 r C m z x D .. "J D .• N x n p t m x n to t r r M H z n e n Dr n c .. A y s x r. OAm n a m r z -- y In n •• O N r O O O O •' P. '" O 3.." Z O .3 O L: a a r N A Ir ‘c, c., U 4 b c c IO m e r .- N n O O O O IO ID V O S O \O '- ,O I.. Ip (.1 I" Ch cc A a G •' A CJ M O 1-I .4 O V sO v O 'O r 10 P N O 43 m n t 0) -C N O O a O O O O x M. \N O IT O 2 O yI O O V 0 N V O O O V T r r N N N 10 I" I• -• b O D 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I n VI N .• I. N N N N 41 (4 4 I+ CI n N N O O 0 0 N 41 A A A •• T O ✓ n P N a w r r 0 0 0 N t a O O w r O O O O O O O V: N z 1 I t 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 N C c c c C• P c a P P a P O 4; 4; 41 C. N W 41 r N N N � C 2 N N C P N N N a in .• n a L C N N O O we N N 41 O O O V S 1 t t C n n x m n n ` z I 11 II ti II 11 II 2 O I II II II II 11 11 D A I II II 11 11 11 I: 0 in I II 11 11 II II II IT IT I 1 11 ❑ II II II I I II II II II 11 w .. I 1 II II II II II E I I 1 4 II II II II :. D O I I 1 IIn 11 II II r s x V I N N 0 ai I Ci 1 d II .0 41 P II .• I" II .. � II II Ip 0 O 2 I V `O CT c• A A II O ( 0 u V .. Cr II a l II V in II V 1 .• 41 I- II I. .- C D O 1 • I . . • II . 1 . II . • • 11 . . U . . II . 1 . . . 11 . A I N I N O O O O II 0 1 0 II n O r. II N N II -. I- 11 en 1 V co` V 11 V V H 11 0 1 0 c. O O O II 0 1 0 11 4. O a 11 a A 11 .. .- 11 Ow 1 IO co ,e 11 N 7 we II I 11 1 It 11 11 II I II a O 1 i • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • e e • • • i .. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1 b b b b b b b b b r IC r r r r r r r 2 b A CJ W C t.l W W IJ W W C b 9 Ib CO CO R O CO CO tb CO 2 T N O O O 0 0 0 0 0 o C 9 0 a a a A A C.1 u 1.4 W rn z o a U N r o `r. P V P T r 9 C C C -1 N N A ZI F 9 D Z Z D -1 A C O C 7 n .• O ^ -� K S K i C a - r m n rn C a m m i m r r: 7 r' C 7 no 9 n N O w a 7 to K n O` X Z m r H 0 co n A r1 C C -C o .. - r r C 7. O Z rn O 9 N .. n r .'r 7C A .. w r'1 ±: r N O n O is C ❑ •.. C 7 K 9 2 n n n K • N .. 9 r N b .+ F r 077 rn n T a O .. y .. n O N IG N O O 2 2 N N 7 7 O Z o O as N V to se r w Ur t C e NO M. C r a r 0. 4: O O O O C 2C \ O'X P V N Ca •.. a C CO Co N O w O ..1 0 a N 2 10 b 'D A N 11 n a N K V Yi IJ OP O O O N O F In IC n O A O CT N W N P O V O O N VI T r N N N N N b r N N O 9 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 n •. N N N N N a (.1 C4 N O O n N N N N a O r a a N N rn O N r a r r r a a O O a .- S C W O O O O O I- O O o O O K Z 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 •4 I P P P P P P P P P P P P C ' 4n N N W W W W •' CAI 4: N 41 P 2 It N N L.: N N V a V V N N L C 10 O ID V N N O V O O 10 N 1 9 O7 I 73 C A I L. I I II I 1 1 II 1 11 1 1 p 9 C7 I 11 ) I 1 n 1 II I I It 9 b i P 1 1 I 11 I 11 I 1 II O s 11 I I 11 I 11 I 1 11 ri RI II I I 11 I 11 I 11 11 I 1 11 1 11 I 11 4. •• 11 I 1 11 1 11 I 11 T II 1 1 II 1 11 1 11 b b O 1 11 A a IV V I N N 1: •. r if.; W G 4 11 : ICJ C: 11 r 70 2 1D 11 r r I W CJ I V r 0 11 r r I O Co II o O 1 V V II o V N 0 X \ II 0 CO 10 P I IL V a V P P 11 r 1-. SO 1 0 II O O I Iv (.I 11 V IC CC C D O II • • I • • 1 • • • • 11 • • 1 • 1 • 11 • • 1 • • 11 • • • Z Z a 11 V V 10 CO IN ID r r P P 11 a A I O 1 O II CO (L 10 P 11 N N /r H -1 \ lie O IV' 4^ I N N N N P P HO O I O 1 O 11 N N IV V II O ID 0 ID II I I II 1 1 11 1 11 V O 1 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • a • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ♦ I A � z a u t.! C z 17 0) 07 S A N O o C A O- a a 71 o O N 7 -4 t ✓ z t 7 7 A N r d -I t m m s m A N L rn N A C O Mi M n N rn n N O C r z n n •• A X -4 N b •• A S m C77 IT 0 tilAr zv .. y M n M 0, c 000 0 2 Oprj co .4I N 0000 a a bK C 0W0 rn. r ". 30 \0 •, 0 Co JPP 0. ¢ •• Ow •M OANI 0 .0 .0 b m n a0 •C O 0: 4 N p r*. \-4 0 m Oa O O O 0000 07 rr I. •• .. r .. O A 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 n .. I.. m, •. I.• •• C n O O O s. O.* 1.. r O, O TI P 0 0 NNNN S C w .. n r 414444 (.4 .•1 2 a yam t; aaa o r u L u t: to v to 0 2 Pe a 00i; 10 t_ C -4 000 OwO ID X •O-1 nnn Am 7 n n n O 7 r 1_ n 11 n 9 t7 II II II A A I n • O —‘ 11 II II IT m n n n II � II II •. •. II L4 II II X h •. I II 7 7 O 11 V II II N •- 3 X` 1O n a h V. W •• •• 11 0, NarJ 070 \ n � 10 OWN II O 47 fJ N N C A O II • 11 • • • • II • • • ♦ • + -• a II 4: 1O O O O AN f.i O a CO H y II I.• II O 0 0 0 11 W Coo N 0 S0 11 11 11 O 0 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 • a t • • • • • • • • • • s o • • • • • • • • • 1 C -1 S •• 2 N 17 9 C A a b a D K C 0 1 a a O w ro .4 'm K v S I c w ! -I O .,I 7 N m t y n no zt r c m z o s c A P n mI C x C r• .. o r C I A n m N 7 rti K C K 2 .• K N O rA� Cm `. CY ,C m nL\\ m (r' �' C" \ C N VVV n N CN rz O Cm [; 1n1 -1 J- C �k\ C }. 7 47 C 1� b 9 1 \ � C o v, c m M� I P � A a 1 x o c r z;-- 1 n 1 I m c 1,' z s `a t C N y m O D 1\ S .rnS n �I G C 't1 n a z e n ry m r. b M C K T. r C O N t -1 C ii. r C W D � -rt r K -� O 5 -" C 1 • O 2 9, 2 9 — C 'Ih m -t N I 1 e � m -1 r 9 S K b 1 5 .. 1.. -1 ^+ 1 m K A 1 rob 1 A 7 N ' .... m 1 K m C K 02 1 { m r 9 S 2 C 2 Tc�I I A I-' 1 9 3 e r o a m n m C 11 C n 2 d I\UUU' I i ;n z S T A S ?- a b O Cr r ,... 1r.1T�1 \, �t n n i s r. -• n 9 O A m C C c b z c a N 14. "�.7 2 N .{� to :4 r n 7 a r m m -+ A p m M. N •I', I rn 4-4 ICS N D n f O 72 A K C A S n I r A V� n o •• K moot l ^ � a f . E 4n 2 C n I c Ali -'t •\. r. N Cc A m .. .• r* s C -1 b R. C 1 C V 7 a O s c 9 � \ ^ -1 S N r N O .r 4.1 O N C N K .1 L m G � V N %.. .-4 9 = -I -n T. . , ¢ r a mr. M I I w m O a C 7 E r C ti Y G z 9 O m 1 ►' O s 2 o C a r n -1 C 'A I I " -. -I C r r 9 P C I V 2 a N W r -i 2 C 1 1 a n 9 0 1 1�fC W c K F S i C �. O IC C n t- -c - 1 c m m x � m IT V .- C t` 1 y r t D n 1 n -+ S C`. a a -4 x o I I•.._ C r ll .. A C 1 I C L\ C C m I. I � A A� r^ c n t r a t� n C 1 a C I,y, � C 2. A C C 1 I 1 .L' � � � 2 N 0 1 v tl r m m il w r I CnVr Q1 CAS S L •• •• X .•s aa n m � �' x m o m. r I .. _ C 1 n •• u ci a l Z K d = _a m o mI ml b 1 K r i• F 1 A I x I S G Y \ I I m a 0 • • • • • • • • • s • • • • • • • • • • o • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 a 37 a a to 11 a a u w r. r r � r .. r 2 a 41 41 41 41 w 41 CJ u C 70 v V V V V V V V .4 3 77 N 0) Co Co V V V V V C7 D O O o o 47 17 10 W 0 m 2 0 N r O 10 Co V a a a s '0 O 0 f! Co O 2 a a o 2 77 77 m a b r r •C H in m 9 .1 m N 1 m m 2 IT 77 11 O N 7• 2 - Z 0 37 N • 2 m 0 b m w M N •. m ✓ 2 C7 • 71 r y 1, m w n ✓ r r• b r r C O C 2 T H m 2 a N n x. m n m r o a 77 77 PI r• C. 0 0 Co f12 2 2 D C N 9 D b < .0 71 = O 7O 1.1 2 r gar -C -C Z CI •• M ($ N .0 CO .. $ n o n O 10 Co w N 2 2 O 77 O 41 C C 41 m I. .r. S. 1• 7C 7C N N C C OD m C O N N r O a a 0 01 •• 0. .I r 2 O \0 2 N Co Co • 10 N O . 4i • • 1• N m •. N Si �1 .. b 1O r .• 17 CO �1 V O O N a m 0 10 N { V10 0 • • .40a 030: V 77 m 1`om 0 77 O N N N O O N N •• O N N O O 11 r • • .• r n r r 10 r • • 1• .. O a 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 .• .7 b a r r CO 01 ♦ .. .0 .O F. S. O a O 00 • 00 1O • r• r 00 O O m 0 01 • • 10 r• in. 01 10 • N 41 41 P 01 '0 C r• • • O .• r O O O V • • •• r •1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 H a a s a a s a a a a a s a a 0 41 41 41 41 41 41 N N N N W W N N CO 2 a 10 10 10 .4 V •• •• N r• .0 .0 a W L C O d V o V V ON ... O V M 0 a 2 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 17 Co n • • 10 b a .0 • • 11 0 r In O .4 ..1 N r r r •+ n o b b. t•• .. I.• M r L 01 Ir 01 a , y II 11 11 0 11 11 11 11 0 II II 11 11 II II 11 L D II 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 0 •I U 11 II II II 11 7 II m m 11 It II II II II 11 11 11 0 II 11 11 11 11 11 •• •• 11 11 II •. M II 11 II 11 II X 11 11 11 •1 •• 11 11 11 II 11 a a O II 11 a • N 11 N N II 11 O CO 11 N 4• I. 11 N N II N N 2 70 m 11 0 N 0 .0 0 .0 110. a 11 N .• 1• 710 01 r• r r• 11 N I. r Ow. .. ii .E r C7 r \ 'IN N II 41 041 11 N N 11 O 00 CO 0 001.0 II O 00 110 O 600 C a N 11 • • II • • • 11 • • 11 • • • 11 • • • ♦ • 11 • • • 11 • • 11 • • 2 2 17 I1 /. r 7 O 00 11 41 41 U0 00 1110 a • Na no 00 11011 to 11N N .4 -I •3/4. 1101 01 IIO 00 001 N 110 00 IIN 0700 • HO 00 IININ lla a 17 11 II O 11 11 II 11 1 II 1. O • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 • 0 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • b b b b b b a b b •• a. r r r r r in. r Z tl W tJ W tJ tJ tJ W W C A V V V V V V V V V S 73 N CO W Co Co Co Co Co tb tb Co b O r � o O O o o O o in z O .• O 10 Co V 0 01 ♦ of A H ti X 0 0 11 n n n n n '0 a M z o ro O O z z d x m n m m O b -i -1 m r .. z r w r m m m m D r b an m A 2 C K 4 A 171 h Z O b m b z O b b w 7D r O 9 b -i -C r p 70 Nl O .i b 70 -C m m -I 70 C '0 m in s H 1 N N Z m m r b N 73 m -C N r 07 1p r n z N m m • O a C z n n y b X. Y '0 O O • F N b = m m C m N in b Y 11 a O A z m -1 n A in n 0 70 m S r O b • 71 b r m r a a ��.z O Si n O P 01 O ♦ 01 01 73 X. O Z z OP O W 01 IH to o Co N m 9I CC CC Cam C N 0 01 N 01 P N 10 `1 N S O 64.0 Z N r l- 0.0 ♦ t0 en r b co m r N M •f GI CO CC 10 1O V O O t0 Silo NO N < 0. 01 0 O tJ O 70 In b m O 70 O O O P O O O O O a 71 .. I- N a M N r r r 01 e b 1 1 1 1 1 I t I I t n r r r b r r .N. N 41. O m p n O r » O .. r O a ♦ o N '0 c w j • O N .' r • O O O -1 z 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 H 0101 01 01 01 01 01 P 01 0 O N W W V W W N W N V to Z Cn W W ♦ r 0. pN V N ♦ t. C O V V r O O 1 10 f O I 17 2 b n n 73 S 0 O 70 = r 4- -I 2 11 11 11 I1 11 11 1 11 11 11 "0 O It II 11 11 11 11 1 11 11 11 b b 11 11 0 11 11 11 I 11 11 is 0 -4 II 11 11 II 0 11 I 11 11 it in m • n • 11 • n 0 li n H u u u H n n u H •• .. II 11 11 II 11 11 11 11 11 r 11 11 II 11 H 0 II II H b b O II W W II 11 ♦ ♦ 11 11 11 II 11 11 N 01 z A Co 11 0 to 11 H N W II V V 11 N 01 11 H /" 11 O O 11 (II N 11 N N 11 r r pp 11 0 it) 11 N r tJ 11 O O II O O 11 01 01 11 N N II O O 11 ♦ ♦ 11 01 P C b N 11 • • II • • • II • • II • • II • • 11 • • II • • 11 • • H • • Z Z NO 11 f.l W 11 N 0 01 11 V V H N N 11 ♦ ♦ 11 O O 11 O O II 0 0 11 ♦ ♦ •1 -I � 11 P 0 HO 00 11 ♦ ♦ 11 01 P 00 O no O 11 O O II O H H 0 0 IO 11 11 II 11 II 11 11 H 11 N O • • ♦ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • a a a 9 A a a a a >S r •• r •• r r r r• • r 2 A W W W W W W W W W C 70 •17 V V V V V V V V V S A N O CO CO m 0 P Co m m m A o N m • r •. ••• r r r r m 2 O O 10 Co •1 P 0 ♦ W N A -i -0 • r r 7C t t t 2 2 2 4 2 1 z i s a 2 w 0 •C O 2 n 2 2 O 1 q T m to 77 o 0 m z m N Z 2 O '9 O • ' n a Ici z •A o -0 0 O 2 m A 0 O O 0 O 0 N O ; O N O N m m r C b -1 •C r 9 r N rn 2 r m 2 70 m O n N 2 n 9 N 9 r C • O 90 z 9 7C 1C1 •i N A r m 70 71: IV N O A 0 M -1IAr N 2 O •• y r. n N V b �1 n n CO r b 2 2 0 a W W W � P C N r r N !.I N C C CO to C O O 10 V V ♦ ♦ ►• O 0 0 P 0 r 2 0 \O 2 N N0> OP CD O a o g b •- V m n b0K 9 V b b W N P r A m �m O A O 0000 O N N O O N O O O O a r m• r en M r r N r r el N NNNN N P b ►• r P r hi r o n M P O O r P O r O m 0 w r. r r In. r ♦ ♦ a N ♦ P I.. P ti C O O ♦ r P O P• O r V 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 - I I 1 1 1 -I a P P P P P P P P 01 P P P P O N NNNN N N W W NN N N W CO 2 N NNNN N N b a I-. N N N P t C O 0000 N �1 O 010 O 01 O 2 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 co n A n C1 n -1 O P. 1, 0 t y n A M A 70 A A M 2 V- n Z X n ` 70 • 2222 2 n 01 -I n II 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 •0 O u II 11 11 11 II 11 11 9 9 11 11 11 II u 11 11 11 0 ..1 II II II II 11 • 11 II m m II a 11 II II 11 • It 11 N 11 11 1I 11 u 11 to es II II 11 11 11 11 11 11 t II 11 11 II 11 11 11 II 9 9 0 11 11 r r II r r 11 11 U N N 11 it W W 2 72 CO r 11 U ♦ 11 b b ON N 11 01 N W Hu W 11 r• r 11 co N O A \ r r b O r 11 P P 11 is •- no O 11 N N n V W W SW W Om •- O N N C A (u • • • • • 11 • • II • • u • • II • • II • • • II • • 11 • • 11 • • 2 ;y .0 ♦ 0 P V 171 11 P P 11 P P VC O HO o um m u u r r Him P II V V -1 -t \ J .O W ►' b o N N HO 0 11 O O 11 O O UN Co ♦ PO O o 0 O POO b It II II 11 11 11 11 11 W O I 0 41 • • • • • 0 • • • • • • 0 • 0 0 0 • ®9 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • O a 77 D A 2 D 2 D X X r r •. .. •• Im •. •. 2 2 D 41 W W W W W W W C 70 b V V V V V V V V a A N Co Co Co Co CO CO CO Co m D O N N N N N N N N T 2 O V 0 0 ♦ W N •• O A K V O 0 2 2 2 2 2 r S In 71 O M T m 0 a T "TI A Z C n h 2 < A MI W A II O n T .. 2 T O 1:* O ^' N III A D A •• N .0 0 O n 2 C N A A m T Am n s os 0 1, •• C 0 D b D T A 0 A M 0 N = 9 0 N C T D '0 • 0 A A 2 is O Z T w 2 w A M.2 o ril n 0 D 2 D •. • N D N A Z •• M OA T 2 2 71Dr o n Nib w n I.. •• iJ W W W W ♦ ♦ n n n r he WI Z 2 0730 W W 01 NIm •. h NN 000 ♦ C ♦ G C OTG CO CD N •• ♦ as. W it. ..1 VP 01 0 O O 20 \n2 N N O IDN ♦ N O •. 0 V 0 N N Ow KIN N O O W •. S. V 0 r A M \N j Yo m OA O 0 O OTC am 00 O00 m O O M .. I. r a. ♦ ♦ ♦ w r •. N M. N IS r O 2 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 1 1 1 1 1 A r •• N •• r r w r n. N N N •• .. N b A 0 it.. r too rr 0 r pis r 10 O .. IV O 10 Im 0 0 01 01 0 O. r r r ♦ Cn r 9 C N• •. W. 01 01 01 01 M In, 0 0 0 01 N Is. •1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 N • 0 01 0 T O 0 0 0 N 0 ON O. a 01 O W W N W W W W N N N N N 10 W N co 2 0 0 N NNNN W N N N N ♦ 0 N 1. C O 0 O 0000 0 O N in O O O O i 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 V 07 n n N A r m m m A n A Ill A n 7 .4 n Z 2 Z A « 4 A C m 00 CI 2 N N N N N N N N '0b N II N N N N 11 - N D D N N 11 11 II 11 li • n N N N N N is ti N N DI T II N N II 11 N I1 11 N N N N N N r N N .. .. 0 11 0 11 11 N ♦ ♦ N II Z 11 11 11 11 11 N . N 11 D D O 11 11 it O •. •• O1 11 .• 11 W N 11 Co Co • 11 2 A O 11 IO W N II w .• 11 •• ONO ♦ 11 ♦ 10 ♦ 11 V N Co at NO O HO O Si N O A \ 11 O to 01 11 40 10 11 01 V V No 11 W Cogs II ♦ � 0 P N r r 11 V V 0 V N C D N 11 • • • 11 • • N • • • • • II • • • II • • • • N • • 11 • • 11 • • 2 X C —I -4 11 O 00 11 W W 11 O 00 • co II O 00 11 O 0 0 0 U0 O HO O II W 4.• IO II 11 11 It II 11 it it ♦ O • • • • • • • • • • • • • • t • • it • 0 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • te b b b b A D A A b .a r r r r r E Cu W W W 41 Ir W W W C 77 '0 ✓ V V V V V V V V 3 73 N O Co 0 CO Co 0 CO Co CD 77 A O 41 41 41 W W W W N N M 2 O P N • 41 N •• O 0 07 20 a '0 '1 -1 N N a H A A O X X S n A M A •• A O 77 m A X m •• •C O K O M 'n 2 A M 0 . Z M t M N M M O M A rn m rn s 1 e7 fl1 -e n A Irn " 73 O 77 an 70 -1 2 n 70 y 73 O S 70 M N A r O A M N 2 N CO M M S M N A O N M, n Ise C '71 ts 77 Z Z r w A n A s 7C n In in A Z n M z M N A • n r 77 X M 0 73 nI IIZ0 w r M P1 • c P • .. r I• rr0 r 1C 0 22 0 73 O m • 2 N W 41 W 41 41 • 70 77 r r C C Co M O N •' N W N P a OP C O • V In a O \A 2 • O N a ♦ V r r. r 10 •• r ✓ 10 N CO 07 41 • • • O 2 O N • M n 10 y { Co CO 10 v Co N CO 77 M b m O 73 N O O N O O NNN N O O N O II its r •+ r w r r r r r r r r r b A 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 n P N N a 10 b P P P P r r P N 0 n 10 •• s co O O • co P 10 O O N /0 a O a r O. ♦ N N Co ♦ • M V M r m '0 C O O •• O O O 0000 • • O O H 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 r1 P co P P P P P 01 P P P P P P O W N N N 41 41 4110r410 N N 41 41 N 4I Co Z V N N N •• r N N N In V V N N C. C vO O O W O O •0 N N O O O O O 2 1 X '0 O 100 0 O 73 m M 73 O A II M C. O C 11 1 II II II 11 it 11 11 S O 11 11 0 II II 0 n n A A 11 I 11 11 11 n 11 11 n C1 •. II I 11 II II 7 II II 7 M T 11 1 is Is II 7 7 II o II 1 II n 7 II II n u ... ... u 1 II I; U n 0 7 If X II 1 11 II 11 0 If x II a A O 11 1 II N N 11 In •• 11 In 11 r 11 11 N N 11 a.% � X X Co CO M ii 1V+ I � O M r 11 10 10 O V CO 10 NO 71 CO I In a CO IJ IP II CO r 41 n n Is II r .•• n CO CO C A N • 11 • 1 • 11 • • n • • 0 • • • n • • • • • 11 • • • n • • n • • 2 2 b • It (al W 11 P P 11 P P n Co P N !IN) P 0 V O II O P ♦ 11 P P 11 O O .1 \ • II NI V II O O 11 V V 11 4I • 1C II IO co I.; 00 11 O 00 II ♦71 N II • ♦ 10 II 1 ll 11 11 1 11 1 11 11 11 Ot O • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • , • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • al b a a b a a a N M M r r • 2 E E IA GI 44I CJ C 73 17 V V V V V .I V 2 A N CO CO CO CO m CO CO a s o ♦ ♦ + u e.l u u m a O N Pe. O C. CO V 0 73 rl 9 N Z t Z C N .1 9 el M m i to a M 0 1 S a y b 17 m m s Z m o c m O -C • N N 3 N IM m m 01 RI n F 2 XI 9 a b c ✓ to c i 0 -I ro N N b m m m •+ z a A N a z y c m a w b eel N e9 CI 1~11 m a Q 111 X ro N Y 3 m A S 2 A n OXm N O 71 b r 2 O .• wri w n b O O a s o a z z oz a ,.+ O o W co O ►• C c p m c o w N IS N O X O \0 2 P O m Co O •O •+ co w NM me O N CO b N O M A •0N { 0. •O O ••. A m \-1 .0 In 0 12 N O 0. O O O O sr Is. 1. N 1Me be r r O D 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 n P » o 0 0 CO 0 /On b 91 ♦ 4 N A 0. N W 9 C PS O r O •. •r O r H Z N 9 0 P 0 0. 01 CO CO O r N N ♦ P O •O W i. C O O 0 0 •O O 9 m O ( N •0 n i n n Xi m b x• n n n O A r ►. c. s .. 11 11 1 11 1 N N 11 N N 9 0 N N N N N N N N aA 11 11 11 N 11 N 11 11 O M 11 11 11 11 11 11 II N m m 11 11 11 11 II 11 is 11 11 W 11 it 11 11 U It 11 S. •s 11 O 11 11 11 N N 11 II (.1 (•1 11 11 Z I1 I. 11 11 11 . M N 11 . « 11 11 b b o 11 N U U 0 0. 11 0 P N N O O 11 11 Z A 0 II O 11 .1 .1 11 01 {71 N W W 11 w 11 O O 11 r r 11 co O A \ 11 W 11 O 0 U N N N m CO 11 CO 10 b 00 O u O O N .0 a b N 11 • 11 • • 11 • • N • 1 • 11 • • • N • • N • • 11 • 11 N 11 OP I O. 11 01 1 111 a V J NO 00 NO O 11 O O u .4 Z.j � ll O N O 1 0 NCO l CO N 0 0 N O Op 11 O O NO O N ♦ •0 11 11 1 N 1 II 1 11 11 N 11 01 0 • • • • • • • • • • • • • 41 • • • • • 0 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1 x I I a S 9 A I •=C C O I a 2 9 Cl 1 N M •C '0 X Co .• 1 O ••• 2 d N 1 m 2 13m e1 N 701 •at c m Q S o 1 r o I m 70 •• O A m l O 2 or rr o 1 m 1 2 O S A 01 -• m0 9 r ti C M •• w .41 -1 N O -1 NI 0 1 w T N m A •_• N N. o 0 0 N S i N O 0 m N1 C 11 A •• O O 9 1 �T ~ ♦ 2 0 1. it 1� O N O m o 11 (!1 y •i S m 1. \ 1 JC A 1 X a z O m A I 1 1"1 1 1 m ro O I ro •-• z a Co 9 -4 1 -. r S T •• o Z w z 9 ••• I m b a z 70 70 e, .1 b m T a K m c o kMZM a m 1 i m C = -f A •1 •2 m -1 H O S •� 2 O I• O 2 O 2 A 2 O T m H q 1 0 M m •1 r A • A i 9 1 m tt N or y 2 ! 1 CO S A 4 m C 1 >o A -N1 9 M i m O 1 O 2 1 z i m r 9 z 2 2 O ( 2 A w 1 D 2 0 r N 9 m m m to I T O A 2 ^ m z l 2 m 70 r • a 2 9 1 o c 70 r .- .1 m 2 0 9 0 9 m m 1s Ctt a 1 2 0 9 0 2 N1 N •1 r 0 TA r m m r 1 9 o m •. N w 1 C m 1 1 • N 9 a 2 0 2 X i o f A 2 is 11 1f 1 w O •• -d 1 m CO O 1 1"V: -1 A I Y • N 2 C n 1 O z 1 S 4 ►+ 2 0 z o 73 a 73 Mt CO 111 C o N A 1 1 N O 1 Y C 9 1~w ♦C1 2 0 a N N Z -1 O N 0 90 H K h 9 X -1 T IN11 1 m m a 9 z m •+ C T 7C I C 1 -1 m r b O .ti C2i 0 70o f' = n 1 O C 2 07 tkt b zz oio 1mn u r -1 i o1 !~ a O I K 1 9 m 'o loll �O Co C m Kfm �J Cz Hm o e .. .1 r_ 17 1 1 lO $ O 0 ti T O 1�,.` o r I .• 70 0 II W = 700 1/ m C n 70 O 160 Z A b 70 o m m a 9 9 z N n 1 = O m m i N A M p a •1 •• co P : a 2 m e 1 , m o m2S1 i s +6 .. m m hi3 Z 9 m tea 2 I A Z 1 IO 1 2 o I • V o • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 0 41 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1 a a a A A A A = r .. WO r r .• r W W W W W W W 0 ?7 7 ✓ V V v V v V 2 MI N CO 0 Co Co Co Co Co m A 0 O t t t r ! a m 7 O .0 0: V a N ♦ W A -1 7 0: D A 9 A A D 7 m N A a O D A M N 7 r CI D r -C r a o D .. o m r r o 4 s m m c o o s D -c m 2 A 2 N c 4-• 1 C 4. -i N 2 Z t m N m ♦. .. 0 m r 3 2 m w 7 N rr m r A r N m o D m N 4 m A Z m A 7 \ A A •C O C O A T. n in A 4 A 2 N O A It 11 A is 2C ♦a -I M A O 0 o w w o N N 27 0730 a Co .0 0 6 C9 CC Co CO C0 CO CO P W 0] Co N ♦• co 43 -1 C C m m c V V O O O O O O O O O O O O O o r .0 N W O 2 0 44. 0 Z 0. CO V J4IV 0. a0a 1NC001 W N O .0 W t Co m ►. W .+ 4 b O m 0VPIr ? W0 .0NWN NN •0 W b W .0 m n owsc k P CO O W 0 I- O X m b R O A O O O 0000000000000 .• •.• N N N 91 w F. r .. r N F. F. O 1 1 1 IIIIIIIIIIIII 1 1 1 1 1 Co .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 b .0 •D .0 .0 •0 .0 •3 .0 v: W W 0 P P C n O O O 000 000 00 000 00 ♦. is. N .0 V m 0 N N N NNNKINNNNNNNNN W * .. N V 7 c O O O 0000000000000 N I. O O O -1 Z 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 -1 a a a a P P P P P P P P a a a P P P P P P O W W W W W W W w W W W W W W W W W W w W W m Z a a a PP PP PP PPP PP PP V V N V N C. C O O O 0000000000000 a. r N W 0 X 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 07 n 0 O m o n m m m o o th O o m 7 .0 o A M A A D Z * V. XXX222NNPc CIMA4 V -Imrnmmm A X LA A7: 7300 0 0 II 0 1 11 0 11 0 7 O_ 11 b 11 1 11 11 11 11 A D 11 • • 1 II II • • a 4 0 0 0 0 II 0 0 m m 11 11 11 II II II 11 11 II II 11 11 11 II .. .. II II W W 11 II II II 1. I 11 ❑ r we 0 II 0 II 11 A A 0 III" 0 V V II rR 11 11 HI. is, 00 0 3 A 0 11 ♦ P V 11 Co m 11 .0 W W W W W W W W W W W a N a 1. � 11 .4. r II V V II O o 80 Om 110 O II P 0 N N V V V V V .I V V P 0 11 w No o V V No W O P P C D W 11 • • • II • ♦ 11 • ♦ • • • OOOOOO • • • • • • 11 • • 11 • • 11 • • 2 2 O 11 0 00 11 O O 111V 0000 04111.714.110011, 011,1 tlIP O N 110 00 110 O HO O 11 •. r 44 ..... II O 00 11 0 O 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 001 II O 00 00 O 00 O Hr. .. 0 II 11 II 0 11 11 11 •. O 0 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 s 0 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 9 9 9 Sr 9 9 9 9 9 Z DX IC p w r •• r •-• r r r r W 41 41 41 41 41 U C. W C A v V V V V V V V v 3 72 N O O O O W O O CO O b 9 O N in a 0 N a VI N 171 m Z O m V a N F (4 N .'' O 7 -i 'b b O c o n n n n n 9 C m A 9 O o O m It' A C C •• r r r -cP -a) •. r O O o -a sa m m a t 7 b _m m m y ti b b 0 z 2 i o c m 2 2 s o n •• o o ro •• •• b to z x b i b b s m z r r . a z .. N C o ^ na s 9 A a C 2 -I n -rI i. m z Z JC is 9 i n 7 " ;r z r .. m a n c m r n -o c to s o 9 m • • r r r c 9 •. r m N 9 r 2 m N N b Y 0 n 7 O 70m C • 17 b r m z .. .4 M n N N Co O g- V O O O 9, Z Z 02 p 1+ i .o •O M N m Co O m C C CO m C .O O W W •. N O N (4 C S O \ 0 2 CO P P •• P n ♦ O N m H Um •i .p N W W N .O .0 .0 m m n ow '[ 0 r o o O 7 m ta m O 7 N N N N N O N a O P N T N N r N a •• N N •'• P .- O 9 I I 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 n m 171 P b .0 •• P N N .O P O n N N ♦ O O O a a N O O m o a' •. O V V r •• .. As N N 9 C 0 0 O m •• N o O O o O i 2 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I i P P P P P P P a a P P O N W 41 41 44 W 41 41 N V 41 m 2 N W N .O .O 41 41 W 0 •• V L C .0 V CO m m I' 41 .0 a 17 1 1 Co •G O O o Z 0 7 m m .O n o 7 II II II 11 11 11 11 it 11 17 0 II II II 11 11 11 It 11 11 A b 11 II 11 11 11 U 11 11 11 O W II II II II II 11 II II II m m II II 11 II II II II II 4 II II II II II II II 11 II •• •• II II .. r n N I+ u it II it II II Z It II II I. II II II It II It b b O II 11 N N II ♦ V P 11 11 11 11 11 v V 11 N A Co 11 N •• •• 11 o O II O V W II N N 11 CO CO 11 41 41 11 ♦ ♦ 11 P P 11 ♦ ♦ O A \ II W O w II O O II CO N W II a' ♦ to a P II O o It N N 11 10 .o a O O C b 41 11 • • • II • • II • • • II • • 11 • • 11 • • II • • 11 • • II • • � 2 O 11 ♦ O ♦ 11 O O 11 O O O 11 O O II N N 11 O o II ♦ ♦ el ♦ ♦ 11 O O S •i \ 11 O O O 11 O O II O O O II O O U N N II O O II N N II N N II O O .O 11 II II II II II II 11 II N O • • • • • • • 45 0 • • • • • • • • • • • 0 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • a z A a A a a a z t r r N n N r C A V V V V V V V Y A N O CO Co Co m Co m m A O . P P P P a P N IR .2 O N + W N r O iO A -1 V n `/' T 71 T r m. M C A C X F M A A z o M M "I O C -1 -1 in m y m o r.. N o a a A m, in r r w r z A Orr A W Z K o In n O m W T x -1 c C C I" X m a z C X A N H A n •, m A 2 2 m 0 rn •+ m n -1 N A Z H Sr 2 n u A n o • A 3 O 2 b O A . X m S A A X O 2 C1 N A C K PE XI m a -ri A r zo •. .1 ►. n O co V V Cr W V O . .. V r 72 OA O 10 O V P ON + P N W P ^' C C CG m C Cr I. CO P CO 4. ? •• I" O IG K 3 O \O O W P 40 W P O 10 I- P N 2 1, r W M -/ O V O t O •. 10 s► V O m n co, K co co W •- O C W -1 A m N.-1 OA 00 P P 010171 N 0 N 01001 O P CG N N N M N N N N N N N N N N N N N or a a N •" I. O 9 I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I n UI o o VI o 01 o In 01 U1 NI o 01 10 IO N a a a O n auto ONVI 411000000 O O W 07 V O T O 1' .. t •. r I- r• N N � 1- O O '0 C 0000000000000 O O r O O O M 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 rt 0000 0000 00000 P P P a P P O NW N W W W N N W N W N W W 01 N W W CO m Z N N N N W N N N N N N N N P I- N N r• co 0. C O N 10 N V NO 1C NO N 10 N O O O N N 3 In r n o O z m ✓ o o z m A s 1_ n w 2 is 11 I 11 O 11 11 11 13 O 11 11 11 II 11 11 11 D A It II II II II 11 11 7 a II 11 II It II II 11 m m II II 11 II 11 II U 11 II I II II II II •. r II Y 11 II II 11 II 11 X 11 • 11 11 11 11 11 11 A A O II U Y P r M II I- r it r I- It .' r II II II X A W 11 W .. P W O N 10 0 W IJ + O VI 0 11 r' r 11 V V 11 ♦ t 11 W U II N N 11 r 11 W P W U W W 10 ♦ V ♦ •. N N N 11 O X Do) N 11 .` r• II N N 11 P P 11 O O C A W 11 • 11 • • 11 • • 11 • • 11 • a 11 • a 11 2 y O 0 n 40 CO P 0100 W O " OO O 40 11 O O HO O 11 V J 11 N P DO O 11 O O r r . 11 V P r I- W V V O CO I" O NOW DO O DO O 11 N N 11 O O HO O II O O 10 11 1/ II 11 11 11 II W O • • • • ♦ • • • • • • • • • • • • • . ♦ • 1 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • a A A A A a a a a X X r r � is. •- ••• •• r m 2 A A W W W W W W W W W C X O is V V V V V V V V 3 A N Co Co Co m m m Co co co P A O V J V V V P Co P P m 2 O A W N •- O b CI V P A N IC L L X X 2 S n e n o m C O A A C A 3 A m A m C C --t m :!! -C rf A A N n to v m m m X -I m m on in r r m m A 2 -. A rl r at a n A { { 9 n X r m K O a A m a N a a m C 2 C a A G M -i C N •- C A 3 r •- o r A n -< m A to A n r -C -1 -d a { M m e z ax m to a CC X -I oAm X ni A m 20 •. is •. n o •- n N Oo S 0 O Co O 0 O 2 2 03 O --I O r ti N m C P 10 CO P Co C C Co m C O V O O IC O � d O W fa! O 3 0 \ 0 2 07 N V Co 0 10 O O P O W W m is W M H 10 N N d O Ip V N IG co 10 m n O /A i o n N O X O O O O O A Co d m O A N CO Co N N N N O N O N O T n a a .- 4, t O is N r I• Ir a A 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 n P N N P 10 10 b P. C N P •- O as + W W • 0 0 O r O (r' N O m 0 m r r CO ♦ W N N V W w. PO X C O � � O W W ♦ N •- O O m -• 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I -7 P P P P P a P P P P a P O W N N W W W W W W W W W m 2 N N P P W W so V %0 l W W L C a O O m ,n a V O co O � •- 4 C ✓ n to + r a Co O A In O P. r V 0 O A 3 0 0 •• L 3 O O Cn it II II i it li II II 11 .0 O II 11 11 I 11 11 11 II 11 A a 0 it it I II II 11 YI 11 a -• 11 11 it I li 11 It It ii m m i it li I a li II II /I I II 11 I li 11 II 11 it .. .. i t mi ti a N N 1 II 11 11 •- r 11 II L I s .I 11 ti r tai I II Ii 11 r . II it a A O I N N ti N N II t t 1 W •- i- 'IN N 11 11 P a 11 11 W W X 3 m 1 0 O 11 H I- ♦ II O O IV CO Co 11 V V 11 11 t+ .- 11 N N 11 r N N O CO � 1 0 O II is .- N II O O 11 O N N 11 V V li ♦ ♦ 11 N N ll IP P. 11 a W N C A 4 I • • 11 • • • 11 • • 11 r • • it • • a • • a • • a • • 0 • • • 2 3 O ICI O II r a a II O O II O 00 11 O O II CO a II P In li •- •- a * O m -i is \ t O O II N N V II O O 11 O O O 11 O O ii O O li O O It W W It N O N 1Q 1 11 11 11 11 II 11 11 11 a. O • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • " �. r • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • a a a a a a a a a a z !C r 1- n t• r r .- 1•. t• � a W W W V W w 4 /r N G C A 9 ✓ V V V V V V V V V 2 A N O Co m Co m 0 /n tF 0 Co O a O m co W to m V V V V V m 2 O t W N ••• O .0 0 V P P b ti V Z Z — z � 2 r r r 7< ro O c o o x> -I 2 A D S •Ca A A A • --I.. A a I 2 r m'+•1 H -1 2 S n O O -, a r m m o z r m A z z n n r a m t A N n c o o r In a — m _ r r -1 m .0 A ✓ O o n s m F A -i m 'O -1 C N x 2 2 2 T. x C 1• C a O m m .1 r '0 m N A O e c to t• 2 S in .. .s z c n m ft, a A C 77C a -4 m O r r m , V Ir. D n o n -4 A n ' n -n o z in in a Ir C m In z Z N Z A 0 ]r w 7- m 9 0 A r n -1 H N a A O A m in m m N z I1 a 1- X A •C K Y O .. y .4 n a L N N O 40 N N N 10 z -• O A O C c -1 -1 m O ••1 •O H O a m m 0 P • O O N 1 O a O A 2 0 ....0 2 A m CO C CO N 05 ! O m tom Um •1 a N •0 0 10 10 `0 0 *Cr o m n O N -C a 1 O O O O O 0 A m ..m OF O O N N N O N 4- N N m 4- I. .• .- N P. P. t+ t+ O a I I I I I 1 I I I I n 10 .- P P N •• P W P P C n O O P P P O a r ♦ •0 m 0 N n P t+ 1- w O W Co N 9 C O N O O O N O N O O V 2 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 -I P P P P P P P P P P O W W u W W U Iv VI W W m 2 N 0 P 0 N 0 0 Ir P t• L C O O .. co N I- IA /v 0 W 2 I I I I '0 to 0 O r .c A m 0 A 4- U II II It 0 11 It It II V C U II ti II 11 11 11 It 11 a a It it it 11 a 11 • U It nste 4 It 11 II II II II II II m CO II II II II II II II II II It II It II 11 II 11 II II •• •• It P II II II 11 N N II IJ W It .- t. 11 z It II 11 II 11 II • • II u r II • 11 a A O 11 II II 11 II II ♦ ♦ 11 O O 11 N N 11 2 A CO W II t• .• If 0 0 II 11 11 ♦ •P 11 O O 11 O O 11 O O 11 P N O A \ N II on P 11 O O • V V It P 0 II N N 11 O O 11 O O 11 O O 11 m 03 C a W • 11 • • II • • II • • 11 • • 11 • • 11 • • 11 • • • • • 11 • • 2 2 O •0 11 O O 11 O O II P P II b d 11 N N 11 O O II O O II O O II O O S -1 N 11 O O II O O 11 O O II 0 N II t 1. 11 O O II O O 11 O O • O O .0 11 11 II 11 II 11 11 11 11 0 O 0 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • I • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • to W GI W IA W W td e A 1, ✓ V V V V V V X A N CO Co CO Co CO m m O a O 10 Co CO Co Co CO m m 2 O O 40 O V O O t A V A 0 A A 'C A y 7 b n m it On m m o a m V 0 -I .I 1 A < 3 r -I -I A r m of O C K .C r = It: C r 2 •• m o H C a a X A m I N N b A A r z s s a O G 1+ 1 T A A r n c r O - r O C C A to z m o m �1 S w m w m O r 0 Xi In n z a m b n n r z C 0 a C 1'1 -I t7 w A E M N n O A m A m "ft ar x o .4 y r n •. 4114 . A 0000 V V W W W .• •. 0 as 1 22 OAO a NN m main CO 0 a to 00r ti CC I C C am 40 00 a (.INNN OOV Va0a O 00 ta \tS2 N O r w O4O m a wrm L + 41 O 01 n m 10 ►1 W or 6 N OOOO m + m 44. + 40 N 4.0 CO fro 47 O N Co A m \•• K 40 m oz a o o N 0000 0000000 N O O 'tit O r r r r r r r r P. r r a 1 1 1 1 I I t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I n N r r O NNNN O 40 10 0 n 1- s a (.IWWW 0000000 + 00 Ino a 0I r N W W W W a a a O O O a CO N N A C O N N O 0 0 0 0 r O O O s 2 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 ' Mill 1 I I -1 a a 0 a a a a a aaaaaa a O O O O N W W W W N W W N N W (J W W W N /r W m 2 10 G. G. V 10N4040 WC4a OGOO N NN I_ C 40 O r W O N O O 0000000 m O O z 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 V m O 40 n n noon n O A 4.- i 11 11 11 11 11 11 x O I 11 11 11 11 II 0 a a I 11 II 11 II II 11 CI ..I I It t1 II II II II m m I 11 II 11 11 11 I1 I 11 II 11 II II It •• 6. I 11 11 11 II it r r 0 S I II II II II II ft .• 11 a a 0 1 II 11 O a 11 II 11 N N II (.: N 7 A Co 1 11 40 0 II a 11m W W 11 N HO O ti 40 + O OA \ I O O it ♦ m a 11 O O 11 N 40 46 N Co II O 0 N N N ON DO O 11 r O N C a (r 1 • a II • • • 11 • ♦ 11 • • w • • 11 • • • • • • • • 11 • • 11 • • • = 2 0 1 V V 11 O 40 r II O o 11 V a ► N * HO W N ♦ N 10 W N HO O 0 a N0 N N \ IN N 11 40 Oo r 11 O O 11 r O V Co Co 11 to W 40 40 1- N r O HO O 11 N OO 40 1 II 1 11 II 1 11 11 1 11 1 a 0 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • d • ' • • • • • • • • • • • o • • • o • • • • • M r 1.4 •• r M r M V � t X. W W W W W W W W W c A A V V V V V V V V V 2 A N CO C CO C CO Co Co Co CO co 9 0 C C to 4.0 C C C C tO m 2 o IO co V P 0 + W N r A y S X A D C O •-II y T en a o r it- c •4 H = C m n m n z m a m b -1 N m in O •4 e1 C A S 4, m X X — z z m a a 2 44 a m H fo A i n x i -4 R, n co O a r 2 s o o r m m o c n z b A O ..4 C C N A "1 9 A 2 O A IT C K O H m ✓ z m o r me+ r r -N M z z m 9C 0 N S N 9 1.4 A S 11 T 9 r 2 44 y PO A F O •4 m A O b 2 z z O A c I• m W A 9 a C m •4 C C Cane W WNNV ►• IO at C '0 W S O SO \02 4• O o• W to — CO to V m CO O b w C •1 W«1 4y 2 C P r CO 10 N to m n 00 t • a a a r O w O a m \•'•1 10 m OA N NOONN N N N O N O N N 71 �. 4. •4 N r• 0 to I- r• b 9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 n a Pr• •4PP P P 0 r 0 P P P O CI P . 0000 C P 0 O O 0 P P m 0 ♦ C in, .• 61• t P t W •4 P N N N A c O 0 ••• I- 0 0 O O O N O O O O 41 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I 1 1 1 1 P P P P P P P P P P P P P P O W W W W W W W W W W W + W W co X • to Co V V C to W •4 N W •O IO V V e• C O Co V V 00 W O N O CO N W N 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 -0 co O 0 O O C CO C, O d C co a � c.`ro II 11 It II II II 11 II ro b 11 11 11 11 II II II 11 9 9 11 U 11 11 11 II 11 11 0 —I II II II II II II II II m m Il II II II II II II II 11 U 11 II II 11 It 11 44 44 11 11 II 4 11 II lr t it II S II 11 11 11 1r II - 4 II II b A O W I . 11 II 11 V v II 11 N 0 11 P Ill 11 is. or. 11 •7 A C O Q7 C N W 1 0 .4C V O P 0 •O •p 1 11 C Co O W W 11 O O 11 W W P 11 N 00 O it P P 9 W C • • • • • • 11 • • 11 • • 11 • • O • • II • • 11 • • 11 • r 11 • • 2 2 O O P P ZOO 11 O O II N N II O O II O O 11 V V 11 C co 11 O O 11 ! ♦ y •y \ 0004100 11 O O HO O 11 O O II O O 11 N P 11 I- r 11 O O h 0 O '6 11 11 it N II 11 II 11 V O . • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • e • • • ' • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • I .a. � r z g 2 w w w 0 X7 13 a V a 2 75 N b b O 0 2 0 r o v A 14 411 X T x x x we m N m r z ` r < O O o m x N m O n n x o o c z m z M M a O 2 < X h 2 0 x •l z m •+ C 0 0 r C Ir 2 2 S n N D A 2 O 70 m 11 a r 2 O •• 4 .• n al O zx 0 75 0 N1n V C C CO RI 01P •• r O SOS N N N ip b wMa N N c m n O H K N a O 75 m O 441 M O A O O O "1 .. 4-. or 1 1 1 n 10 10 •• 0 n 0 0 O m 0 11 N N r '0 C 1r O O N a 2 2 P P P0 r w w w m 2 P P w L C •1 O O a 2 a N 2 75 m 2 2 NN O r r m m c. A N 11 11 It tt 1, 0 It 11 0 11 2 2 11 11 11 11 O a 11 11 11 11 m m 11 11 11 11 11 4., 11 11 11 •• n 11 r 11 11 11 X 11 •1 11 11 II 0 0 O 11 V 11 w •• M II 11 P :i A Co 11 W ti P V CO 11 N N 11 P pQ JC 11 CO 11 � m P 11 CO P 11 W C A w 11 • 11 • • • • • • 11 • Z 2 O 11 w 11 w O w 11 Ib CO II 1+ •1 a 14. 11 P 11 ♦ O a II O O 11 CO 10 11 11 11 11 CO O • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 0411 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • tli t 0 W ro •• 2 to 0 A O A D I I a S a a K Li W W G A 2 a et)O 1 _/� 1 W m b S k P O z a z m o I r 1 c 1 rn z I. o n m0 2 c r 1.1 o 1 m l O 2 b n W IT N 'Dr W -/ C W S ►. W T N O W{11��\\ C m 2 w v � W m ►, _ �� n wI �s V m it H ID A Vl n "%.12$ o N �'t` G m e 1�� .• o �� ., o o ig A � O 1 O A n7 \ T O ID n a X 1 0 0 1\1:111 Z 0 0 a O W n 1 Iv K O N O ' m 4 1, S CI' I ✓n\ b q I. X N 1 1 O t' F I n l R '0 -O ro X IP \ _ N W I ` r r F� 'TI Its O - r� A t� �l fR�` C a b A p n n W O 6 T A A b O n m m m O K JC K m C O N K W C CD C r 1 •I a 2 m -i 0 O in s- T O1(` i 02 - a z • O �1 m W W 'ip\� I C •R m -1 r a -� ti m W K 2 1 m a 1 A ro NWS n-oe m o -/Q� � 1 0 = � m r a s _ $ n XTA IA1 � z � 1 � 2 v r NAm m m C 11 O n 3 ',Ft�•�IY�;�� m �� m i n a o A mS 2 4 O 0 z r .•t I r to ro C A ham. X a a NI 2 N N -t r n '1I a r r^ 771 W b p� v m .+ N O+ I m W et N a n 2 0 z b K C F X H n l b w q .. W 1 m N O I W a 1 t N 2 C n 1 C 2 S W w S N .Z O .'C O a m ( .. n. W a W m m C CC N A JA l� N O 2-' S C a \G4 2 (a 04 ttI O A N N 1V -1 O To; Q1 O N d P X T ijI m m e A .0 m 1 w C �1 L l C W m >C v O z n c � r i l`JJ ...run) -oi o z m ni I �" z a v m a O C 1 �0 S O N 60 r W T O I 1 M n q O 1 1 (� a O K ttl �1 � a m A M I 11 C3 C O 2 O I'• V O z n 1.. 1 1 • C 44 rr,, � •. • y ro r n 1 1 W a n n W b IP 1\) � C � I~ 1- b o O "11 W z o m c n I 1 2 4. • O '1/4.14 I � O S cn m m m 1! -t S 1� rV G S Z 0 t 1' n in m 1 z q •• •• 1t1' S z 1 N Q C 02 m m 1 a 1•. 1 i6 z a m w m1 m1; b IfIl I • K 2 m O z 1 z_I 2 1 1 v 2 \ 1 1 • • m O O • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •br .b. n 2. .b. re ...r 2. b.. � r 2 A W U U U W U U U W C A ✓ V V V V V V V V 2 A 10 b 'D 10 b V 10 10 b C b ► o O o O 0 0 0 o m 2 O 10 CO V a o a w N A l CO C C 0 C b A A to 13 A A A O m 2 2 CI A O M A C N r rn r `C N 1 1 X A 0 b m N 1 1 C 1i re 0 p rn a O O A R l 2 A K A D. o o f 7C 2 T r co . A p A 13 n A O In C1 11 01 rn p C O A C a r n 7C rn 11A 2 4 -1 A 2 b 0 b 11 O -+ O 2 N .4 2 K 0 C m 1:1 b r A 7 0 b O rn A '0 O O A 111 b X •. w •. O 10 CINCIA O In N O A N S 2 0A . CO A ► ... es, is. CO r r o a o C C tu rn w •• 01 0 W U a w r w a 4> 2 0 N.a I... N IO w CO V W Pi J• N O P co r U r • 1C 0 C N W V N CO N 0 b a I1 n ► 0 O r O O V 1G CO CO r A A RI b CO O A ✓ V N CI O CI a O O O O •1 O 11 0 0 t • •1 a Y r r r r 0 r O b 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 C1 r ,aw w rrr ... N r .. N a .. O n ✓ r O r 0 .• ► w O O r r O m 0 W OI r N N o'1 P O+ ► r OS 1, C O O t 0 0 N M O r r O O r V 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 P 01 OI P P P CT a O' 0, T 0+ P O r r W NNNN N W N U w w C 2 ♦ a O 0 r 0 N N a U V w + C. C ✓ W V 0 0 0 0 O O a O N O 2 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 '0 0 s- 0 0 0 a n n 1 A r m V 'fit 11 m c fl a A O O A •• N N N O 2' A t- 0 C C C S a O 11 II II 11 11 II 11 11 11 11 19 11 0 II 11 II II 11 b II II 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 0 II II II 11 II ll 1I U 11 rn II II II 11 II II 1I 11 II II II II 11 II 11 0 C II r II 11 II II 11 11 11 0 11 IC 11 11 C II 11 II II II II b b 11 N r 11 N N 11 P Si 11 ► ► 11 w U II N N 11 II V V II N N 2 A ► O r 11 N N 11 0 r 0 N 0 4. 11 1' ♦ 11 N N 11 10 0 11 10 e0 11 O O 11 W w C b 11 • 11 • • 11 • • • • • II • ♦ 11 • • 11 • • 11 • • 11 or • 11 • • Z 2 11 0 00 11 O O 11 0 w a N V ow w Ho O 11 w w 11 0 O 11 0 O II CA O) 1 1 II O 0 0 II 0 O 11 V O co Co ! C a a 11 O o 11 0 N 11 O O ll o O is 0 0 11 11 11 ll 11 11 0 II 1I r • • i • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • f • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • A D a a D A a a ! IC ✓ r n r r r r z a D V V V V V V V Z 24 - N •0 0 10 .4 Co 10 10 Co a 0 ✓ r r r r r r M2 0 V P 0 a W N r- 23 -4 2 n n A n n A m A O O O m o C a a r r 2 2 2 -C X c O r V �1 M 11 A A a A7 r. R o a a t z A 0 o z 0 0 0 0 rn .. 2 a H N C 0 2 r b C 117 M O a 2 -1 i n C 2 r fil s en V Co m M n A 2 2 O a a c m m 0 n r v c a o n a r a m r A Y A 03> -C c 2 D A O r m r o z bar •C TO » -4 r-4 n rr n7 n .0 N 2 4000000000000404.000 22 O A O O r z o w A 0000 . . . . . . . . . . 00 CC 0 M C ✓ 1-1 0 O CO C N •- •+ 00 •040 •0100CJ02 Vr0 20 \ 0 ... O n o 0 r r 0 N W 0 10 W N r 0 V 0 a r 10 V W m r W w .1 a O •+ w 10 X .00 m n 4-40K O co N 0 2 0 0 MM b M 0A a r r o o r O000000000000000 11 Di I 11 II 1 I .I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII O n N a a N r 4. on W r r r O r 0000000000000000 ;I pp r V a r P W 0000000000000000 9 C •• o o O r o r -I2 1 1 1 I I 1 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII --I P P P P P P 0000000000000000 0 N N W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W CZ N IO N V P w a (... C O •0 O 0 O W V V V V . . . . . . V V V V V V 2 1 1 1 1 t II 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 9 07 -/ *4 n N nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn mm 0 A n 13 A n n n n n n n n n A n n n n n O A 2 t_ n H 11 11 11 II 11 '00 II 11 11 II 11 II a 4 11 11 11 II II 11 0 .4 II II II II II II IR to II II II II II 11 II II II II II II •• •• 11 II 11 0 11 II = II II 0 II II n DA O n r .•. O a a Il r r 0 r r n II V r r r ON N 11 W W h0 0 11 N N MN N 0 .4 a 0 r N N P W N W r a P a r r N O A \ O 00 O OW W 00 O Ow r H W W n O N a C O N O W P W c V w NO O N CA W • 11 • • 11 • • 11 • a 11 • • II • • 11 • • • • ♦ • • • • • • • • • • • • •- z r r00 O O 11 N N 11 O O 11 a a 11 W 10 H N 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 V ti \ N It O O n O o n O O n a a Jim N n N O O C o 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 c n 11 II U 11 II 1 NO • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • b O - b D b b b b t L r n r •. r r r r z b b III IJ W W W W W W C A 17; V V V V V Y V V 2 A N •0 b b •0 b •0 b b v b 0 N N N N N r r r m z O . t: iv m O •0 O V A N m 11 M M In M b O n 'O to N 2 2 n c m A D 2 IA C '0 O b 9 A K .• C ti x m r z m ✓ 1"1to A o K A II m •C c 1": m s Ile n O m A d m A 13 r c 4 t N O I 44 r m r m sit K n 0 C 11 to n b N D T 0 S n et � -i M V '0 •-r c n A -4 r b v ., x K K z 2 0 N n w n • z c o n n D r o3 b X r O b 01 b z t z A .r t-t b < OAm O A T S r m z •• .I •+ n c_ b b b . O NF NA S11RI0 O 2 x OAO C C w I CO V) 00000000 V C C m M C r •• 0 b b r 0 0O Co Co Co 0 Co m •0 2 O \O 2 -C b N O Cr b N N N N N N N N . m w W •c K b N In 1 P N .• O nl n ISO -t O •0 •• N r A m \.1 b R. O A r N r N O N O Ti d . b N •• 0 to b d b b 0 •O .0 P O b 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 n . •0 . b r b N O A .. o r o O O r w m O . . V V CI V V V V V V V V •1 •• ro C O . O O r r 000 00000 •• 1 Y 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 •1 0• 0. P IT P 0• 0 a 0 OI ON P 0• 0• P 0 W W O W 44 W td W W W IA V 41 W N co z Ir V 0• . 0 NO V V V V V V V V 0 t_ C O V O N 0 CO 00000000 O 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 17 co m . r CO n CO NEN At11M0 n A m CO V 2 b n b O O A •. N m c_ o 2 n 1 n h 11 n I n It 1 II '0 t n n n n n 11 If 11 3> 0 II II II II 11 • II II 0 -'1 II 11 11 11 II II n 11 M m it 11 II It 11 11 11 it II 11 ti II 11 II t1 11 •• •• Ii II 11 II II II II It t 11 11 It It II II 11 11 b b O II N N II I.. r II N N 11 11 11 II 11 S A Co 11 . . II V V 11 N N 11 r r 11 . . 11 W W 0 al; N N r 11 . N 0 A \ 0 01 0 n O O 11 O O UN N 11 N N II O O ON . •• tJ O W Co V N II Id Co I C A W 11 • • II • • II • • 11 • • II • • 11 • • 11 • • • • • • • • • tt • • I 2 2 •. 11 . . II O O 0 O O 0 •0 I0 0 b •0 11 N N 11 04 tb . . 0• co 0; NO U b Co 1 -1 d \ It O O ISO 0 HO O II N N n a 0• 110 O 110 00000000 11N 01 •0 11 I 11 11 11 11 11 11 0 1 IJ O • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 4111 9 9 9 b 9 9 9 9 9 I[ is r r '. r r r r r 2 9 W W C4 W w W W W W c A -0 ✓ V V V V V V V V S A N o vD •D .D kD kD lD 10 'D O 9 O W W W W N N N N N m7 O W N • O 0 O V P O A ..I S 0 C C1 0 '9 T T 91 9 A A A A A A r b 9 9 m m m m O 9 O e < Qs m m rn m N z -1 r m • r r r r •• x . x m m m m m r r z 74 A < •C < < •'I -• D b 1 91 A is S C A T a r m m 9 A 9 w A A A -C n h n m r ►. M O S 9 0 n 9 M n 9 r A ►. O L• -1 r c c m r -t) •• A 9 '0 . 9 2 b S N b n m m• A x 2 O A rn i n 91 9 r • s o •• -y •, n O W 4 a N O O CO to V 10 O O 2Z Q A Z V. V o •0 0 0 • x x x co co c c CO RI O N • a 4 N N O 0 0 0 W W 2 0 \ 0 r` O 445 4D 4 'D r r 4 r IF. r r r CO M W N H Oi O N 0 01 4 Ol 0 O 0 0 m n •+ N K W V N O N N N O O A m 40 � OA N r O O O 0 0 0 .' N IV N V V 91 A. 10 ►. It- r r r • • I 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I O n 10 4 r rr N N N 4 •D it. *0 • 4 O n O r O O O • • • r 0 0 0 is. an m 0 W 4 N a a is 1• r t W W W N .III '0 C 4 O OI r Is O O O O 4 4 a• a O -I 2 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I •1 a a P 01 Co a 10 a a a a 0. P a O W W W Ca W W W W N W w w r r CO 2 .0 Ol Co 4 4 r r r N Co .O *0 4 4 L C ✓ O O • .• N N 0 O V V V V W 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 x W 4 •d n n w C. r. a. 4 + A on ✓ Co S S A 9 2 V V V p A .• 9 9 M is n r r r L O W N r r a a a O1 11 II II 11 II 11 II II 9 C II II II II II 11 11 II b A II 11 11 11 0 11 11 11 C V II 11 II 11 II 11 II 11 m rn II II II 11 II II II it II II II 0 II II 11 II •• •• 11 11 11 II • It 11 the 11 11 x II 11 11 /1 •, 11 11 . 11 II 9 9 O ✓ 11 11 II 11 0 Ol N N II U I-. W W W II N N II 2 70 C G. 11 d .D 11 .C .0 11 • • 4 w 11 ' tO O 11 O Co Ow V VV 11 O O 11 Co P O V 4 11 V V ll b b 11 V NW It W N O N 0 r r 00 O O O 11 O O u N N C • p • • II • • 11 • • • 11 • • • • II • • 11 • • • • II • • II • • S Z r O II N P. II V V II O N V II N .D N • II 0 0% HO O O O 11 O O 11 CO CO +1 '-I O 11 O O 11 w 0 11 r O 4 11 co O H O 11 co co to O O O HO O 11 Co 0) 'D 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 ♦ O • • ♦ • • • • • • • • • 0 0 • 0 • • • • • El • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 0 X. b b b b a b a b b r a r IS P. n r r r r n r .2 b 2 4 4 4 W W 4 W W W W C A 1 V V V V V V V V V V 2 A • .0 b b 10 >0 b O O .0 0 m b c t ♦ * W 4 W 4 4 W 4 m Z C N n O .p m V a a ♦ W A -4 1 h L. Y z z 7 x 2 x s "0 M A 2 0 44 A m A Z.0 A t 11 O a S (/) 2 A Co b O m m m Mm -4CA < A N m n to . m .. a � 4. b O n T p n • a O IA w w m n r M '1 S m A \ r z o b A Z b p m O 2 •4 2 .'0 N A • w D C c N C Z b 2 • n n N A m IT C b A 17 z b x b y b ✓ n Az •C O O a r ✓ m b r o 2 .o M ti r r. n •. Co V r m tr 2 2 27 07 C a r V x x t 17 4a w a C C m m C 4 1" N •. •• 0 O W O O 3 O \ h N O .0 O O a m V Ip Co m w Caw .a •.. 4 4 0 .O N Co b 4 m n •• (41 •4 t •" N N V 4 O O A m 1%.••1 0 m O A ID co P N N a •' O n 11 a a O ♦ 0 O w .0 r 0 b A 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I n N N N •0 .0 N ♦ P n ♦ O n 4 4 is. O O n n n o r m O n r a 4 4 a t ♦ n t . .• n O 4 t0 O O r O •4 2 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 4 1 •4 a a a a s a a a a a O N N a W W 4 4 N W W co 2 to a .0 0 .0 a U. N V V 4 C O O .C V V O O •. VI O 2 1 1 1 I 1 1 1) tr n n ••• a. m C A m G O V V A N O A 2 7 w n 4 2 2 N a II 11 1 II 11 II II II 11 11 1 V O is II n n 11 11 11 11 It b 2 11 11 11 11 11 II 1. 11 11 a -4 n v II II 11 II It 11 II m m it a n it it n to n n 11 11 II to 11 11 n ti 11 .. .. II 1 11 n 11 11 11 11 1. 11 x 11 1 It a II it n 11 tl it b b O N 11 I 11 11 V W 4 11 11 11 0 11 n w 3 A Co a 11 W I 4 11 11 N a s 11 4 4 11 V V II 4 4 It t r 11 N a 11 4 O A N 11 4 ' G. II P ♦ 11 a 4 4 II .0 •0 11 Co Co 11 ... ♦ 11 V V • w 4 • an C b 4 • • • 1 • 11 • • 11 • • • 11 • • 11 • • 11 • • II • • 11 • • II • .. V 11 O 1 O 0 m Co 11 O O O 11 d 0 11 V V II ♦ ♦ 11 ♦ t 11 a a II O ••1 •i O II 0 1 0 if O O /1 O O O II N N 11 N to II 0 1 0 11 O O II O O 11 O b 11 1 11 II 11 11 11 ( II II 11 /r O • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . . . 1 A • ♦ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 41 a D a 2, a a a b b 2 b a •• r o•. Y I. Y Y Y W W W W (..I W W W W C ?7 b V V V .1 V V V V V 3 A N O to ID to ID ID V) b b m a o N ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ m Z 0 O ID tD V CI O 4• W N A H t 2 3 r r X 7C 7C X X ti O A Y D O 0 w m m b -I V Y A 2 M A w m -e T b a < a z co r no In D r D � A r { v m m V 3 m 0 . o A •A z o to en 9 M D C. O •. C1 � O T -•ti r 3 2 O ❑.1 m • I. A I. A m O r b m r z c7 .. o ✓ z D m H O 9 D t 12 CO a r A S { O AT mar 20 .. •• � M A IC O O 23 T W W A 222 O 22 020 O CO CO W CO O V V PI Y m O CO C 0 m m C 0- W O OOO W tl OOO W 2 0 \ a = O I• r C7 07 0 V I0 C G CO m Y 1D h W Y V ID 1D 3 V W IC ID 1D IC III A I• 0 K O O O 0 0 0 O A m �G m O 9 r• OOO OO r OOO V 71 In ID •C r •• r I• I., IC I. O.. Y ID O b I I I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I CI W ♦ Y Y Y 1+ Is ♦ Y Y Y .I O A O •• Y OOO OO Y OOO •• m 0 A IP ♦ Y Y r A P V r in in 0 b C r O O In Y Y I. h. O Y Y r r .i Z 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 •1 P a a a a a a s a P T O a O W Y W W W W N N N W W W r O 2 T ♦ V V V V W W X V V V t t• C O V O tI1 V W ♦ ♦ ID N V W V 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12 07 A 0 0 0 A 11 Si b b z m A P. I• I. A A r r r o A N N N C. II 11 11 11 11 II II 11 II it O II II II II II II 11 II II b DI II II II 11 11 II • It 11 O .1 II II II II II II II 11 II VI P'. II II II II II II 11 II • It II II II II II II II II •• Of 11 N N 11 II 11 II It Il II 11 ; II II 11 11 11 11 II 11 11 D D O 11 N O II II fl ♦ W 11 II Y I. II W n II II N 3 A C+ II N N 11 O N II W W II ♦ N W to a 1D W A 0 0 o II N 10 co O 71 V V 11 N O A � 11 O O II O O II N N II t A 0 O II ♦ OW 11 O O II W NO O UN N II N C b W 11 • • II • • II • • 11 • • • • 11 • • • 11 • • M • • • N • a 11 • Z Z1 Y lI O o 00 O II ♦ ♦ II {71 NU; O II O a Ile O II p Co coo 11 O O it V N V ••. 11 O O II O O II O O 11 N O •-• 4. II O O O II O O II V) O N ♦ II O O II O X 11 11 II II II 11 II 11 ll A O 41 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •a:al • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • I a i• .a. A A a 7P A = IC r •• r i- •^ •. � w Z A L W Ca W W W W w W W C A ro V V V V V V V V V X A N 10 10 (D 4,0 ,0 10 (0 V 10 CO A O N Ir O N N N O N In rn z O 0 Co V 01 N a W N r A -I b 17 b ro O O O Z Z 3 '0 ,_ N A -I -n Z A A U -c ~ S x S m m -1 •4 A f11 A O Z it r J0 r t'10 O O ... V a r x n v ro O1 A • 2 0 a K a a m n n o a w lair -c a a z IQ 3 .. III 0 co o Irrl o Z ° a rn .< n c s m ro w -1 a a n + x -0a a . i n m m r m a b N r n a t n m N a r o xtr tv 0 m 1°yar • z Z .• .y 1. n 10 co O O W W N E"a 11 r r 3 Z 2 O A C C C Di a N O 0000 I+ 0 n C C O 0 C r 1. O 4: d N R W 0: Co O r O Y O �O = a 0 r N ,0 N N N N r V 0i m 1+ W be .• •0 0 10 10 N P W W w W W N N m n •• 0 -C 0 + O O 0 W O 10 F m 'N.-I NO m 0Z r V .. O r r r r O r •• T ♦ ♦• O V 10 r ID 10 b b •• 90 0 0 a 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 n 0 b a• r w r a• a• t ♦ r ♦ a• o n 0 0 ,• o .. o r - ,- r o .. r m ° a• 0 #4 w a• O, V V V (.I P V a• S C r t O r O 499 0000 I's O O V Z 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 •1 OI DI P T 01 01 0 0. 0, 01 0 o co O W W W r N W w w W 41 N N W co Z ,0 10 N t 0 0 V V V V Ir N V L C V V V W O O 0 0 0 0 O O O Y 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 '0 m a• ♦ n1 ni n N At 11 L r x m N In •I 0 1 II 0 0 11 a 0 • II 1 ro 0 11 11 II 0 0 0 a 0 0 A A 0 11 11 II II 11 11 11 II O i 11 li 11 11 11 II 11 11 11 f• m II II 11 11 11 • 11 11 11 0 11 11 11 11 11 II 11 11 .• •• • II 11 II II 11 11 II 11 0 I 11 II 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 a D O 0 V W W O N N II r r 11 N N I1 II N r 11 W W 11 r r 11 X A IL 11 V 0 Co 11 N N 0 V V 11 N N It a J• 11 W .+ 11 a a 11 P ♦ 11 ♦• ♦ O A .441/4 ll ♦ V V 11 6 Co 11 •' .. 11 W W OM O II W .I a 0 a 11 W w 00 O O N N C a W 0 • • • 0 • • II • • II • • II • • 11 • • • • • 11 • • II • • 11 • • 2 Y r HO I O O II V V Or r 11 •D d II V V II P CA Ib M ♦ II O O II ♦ ♦ ON N •4 ••1 11 O 1 O O II 0 0 11 .' •• 11 1. •. 11 O <D 11 O O O O O HO O 11 N N 11 O O 10 II 1 11 11 11 11 11 II 11 11 V O • • • • ♦ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 1 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • E .a.' x s s W W W W W c = 'C V V V V V = A N H7 IC 10 C C d a O M P P P O M Z C # W N r 0 AM T T ro T T T T C a m m m a _ C M M 2 t ✓ T R —, z m .. m to i t m m z +i a a n N N m n a a m o n N c a t s m c n N A r O 3 1 n A ..• 2 M A M Z M, M S M O .. A n .. a N c -i r n .. T -4 a m a s r z ar a m y o a n r r T as en a r O A m r � velar O 20 mm m n O 0000000000 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000000T P 0ti P 0 T V Z O A Op P PN N0000000T, 00 000 00000 0NNNNOOT d CC OMC J e * m V V d A 0 0 0 M N m N N N N N N N N CNNNNWO V = 0 1\0 = O WPN W W V .• W N .• r NW d X0 .. OOO .. O r Om WmM ✓ dW V VOmVNCOCT ACV NX0MTmT9 OOxAPW V MA m04 V O O P V d N W 0 d W A 00 0 0 0 A W m 0 MM \M CM OA O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 N V r r r 10 0 10 0 W 10 0 0 C000000 0 0 W 0 10 r CA 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I CI NN 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W W P MO O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 mm VV . . . . . . d d d V W .• d d T C �+ 00 00000000 0000000 O M Z IIIIIIIIIIII 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 M 000000000000 00 00000040 0000. 000 P O W W W W W W W W W W W W WW W W W W W W W W ONNNNWN N OZ d OO V V V V V V V V O N N N N V N N W0 .. r 00 .• 0 .' r 0 I. r .. 00 00 000000 00' 00000 w S IIIIIIIIIIII II 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 II 1 1 no noarnzSnannN 33 NYNar .. T9 rA T C MM 0 = 00 = 0X = 0 = = 0 Co A T OA 399999099 9A X C t. O 0CCNO WO •' O nn u 0 0 u V0 0 II 0 11 b9 11 II II 11 ON 11 11 0 0 MM 11 0 n h It II , 0 it NN N N it it u n X r m 0 11 n 0 99 O V W m n to N W 11 .• n 0 3 A 0 O %10 d N V tT 0 N n W .• N 00 • V d .• m mm Ha N .. n N N CM \ COddNem0W ON W n d or 0 tll rWP0- ONNmd nm m0V W VO V HO d C9 W n • • • n • • • • • • • • • II • n • • ZS N O 0 •' •' N000NN V P n V ON he 00ONPON O 4V OOd W Pm N PC C MM \ C W 0 N P 0 0 c V V P W n C O C HO 00000000 HP O O N N d 0 O 00 0 C 0 0 0 n 00 • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 0 • • • 0 • • 1 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • is a a _a a 2. a 2 2 r r r r '- D > W W W W W W W C A 'C V V V V V V V 2 A N Co b +0 b C O 10 CO a C ✓ P P P 0 P P m z C O 10 co V P VI ♦ 2 -4 A n n q r r m C a Q O CO � T r C7 < y y CO T 0 N r T -1 V r CO T r Is. T Is r 0 o A O n re r ✓ q o z (n I, c r r w a m xi sc o z A a m 2 � m � •-• z r+ A n A 1 n (_ T m 2 PI b • 0 z O M • T p Y H m N D m O AA O r '1la r o zo .. -4 M PI O 0 O O 0 0 0 0 N 2 (n A A is 9t "I 2 O 72 O ;0 09 O W A r (nA "1 b 0000000 9 C) co d t co rn 2 2 O O 0000 0000 000 O O On = C \ CT2 ✓ r a CO C> CO CO CO CO CO W CO 0 CO CI 0 CO ♦ CI r• 41 r V O 10 N N NNN N NNNN NNN N N 41 T n r (0 •C C: O is V a V A m m O A N N r r r O 7l ♦ ♦ 10 10010 /0 /0 0ID 10 `0 01D 10 10 0 or O a 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I a• q CS n 10 10 4h 4.4 0 0 r r r r r o m 0 41 ♦ V V V V V V V V V V V V V ♦ ♦ P 9 C Gi A O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O r -4 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 M P O P P P P P P P P 01 a 01 a a a a P 0 41 W 41 41 41 41 1J 41 4141 4“4 41 41 41 41 41 41 C z V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V VI V ♦ C. C 0 0 O 00000 O O O O o o O O O r 2 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I it to ♦ ► r r in A 11 b N X N A 9 r of T n A m r r 9 T o A N N b (• o O 1 1 is 11 I 11 1 is 11 11 9 C I II 11 II II 11 It A a I 11 is It 11 11 11 0 .4 I II II 11 II II 11 T T 1 II II II it u of 1 11 11 11 II 11 II r. r I II It 11 Is a II G L 1 II II It II II It . a a 0 I r r II 11 11 sr II 11 r r 11 CO N 2 A C> I 10 ♦ CI 11 r r 11 O N r r II V N W r or N II V V II V V II N N o A � 1 CO O v II ♦ a 11 41 O 0 O O) LC II 0 a r ♦ N ♦ 41 II W m 11 (v (r II P ♦ C A 4t 1 • • • 11 • • I I • • • • • • II • • • • • • • • II • • 11 • • II • • � r I CO P 11 N N It ♦ P P 4- .• ON 0 N 0 Co 11 V V 11 N N II r V •i r1 t TO O O DC) O 1I O 000 O O 110 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 HO N 00 O II r C: d I II II 11 • 1 II 11 C. 0 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 4 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1 D A A A D A A A T. 7 ♦. r I. Ye r r .. .. 2 A 7 W W W W 41 W W W C A J V V V V V V V T X P .0 .0 •o .c •O .0 •O •0 co A C J V V V V J V V T T f m V A o ♦ W N .1P A .4 1 C -1 N N N N N N 9 O K H -1 .r T in A N O N 70 O PI A 2 -C 07 -I •• r 0 2 y in X .• In n r z z z m to 2 7C r 0 C y D N A m al ...� .11 X C .. •I .r n A •tl n 7C A ✓ zs m o m z - m ✓ m A a < N 2 a C -1 y { r n z a • D Y C C b p t n it 1^ -1 m X M +1 O -< b Z • 2 N D I.. A J CI 2 O 77 r O n 11A r 2 C .• y M O O A N CO t O1n a T, A O N 22 0 X C m CO tr N a 000000 CO CO N C C WmC O 0 T O I+ 000000 N W A MO 1.0Z a A C W ♦ CO CO W ON Co A •• O CO •. W ►. • r w 2 1 NN NNN N O CO m 0 •• C0 •• CT C V N N N N A N O A In 4.m O 713 O O •• O N r V O T .• r .0 N 0 0 .0 .0 10 .0 .0 r .0 r 0 A 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I n N N ♦ r .0 W ♦ r b on .. I- r O 0 r P. O m 0 .. SP W A A V V V V V V y 1• a 11 C O O O •• O OOOOOO O O I- y 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 y CA A A O A A A A A A A A A A O • W W N W W W W W W W W ♦ .. W W 2 ♦ ♦ 0 A .0 V V V V V V V a a C. C A A .0 0 CD C300000 0 0 0 0 o- W O m 1 1 1 1 IIIII I 1 II m nn n N L037 '0A T n A In H N 0 Ca n o 73 C C r r is 11 1 11 II II II II II S C 11 II 11 11 I1 11 11 11 b 7 II 11 11 11 H 11 11 11 0 • • 11 11 11 II II tl II m /l II II 11 II • • • N • I I • II 11 11 U • O O II II .• • II • II 11 ... •- 11 11 A A 11 II r 11 1 II II 11 . - II II .. - • I. D D < II N 1 .- .• 11 • .0 .0 ❑ •• •• 11 11 ♦ ♦ 11 n. •• II N N ]I X. a 11 a I •- N II II r .. 0 V V 11 A W 11 .. � a V V 11 N N O A � II 0 I 0 W 00 10 11 O O u r .• 11 N .0 N 1- A A A 11 N N 11 ♦ ♦ 11 A A C A 4 11 • I • • 11 • ( • is • • 11 • • II • • ♦ • • • • It • • 0 • • M • • 2 S •1 111• I WO 110 1 0 11 O O 110 O II 00 NO. CO0 II A A 1101 0 11 0I N y -{ 1 11 N I N W 11 0 1 0 11 O O 11 N N II O 0 0 0 0 0 0 OA A II N I N op 1 0 1. .C II I 11 I 11 11 11 11 II 1 II 1 O C • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Ifni • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • il a b b b z. a b b b 2 D D r r• r r r r r r r W W W W W W W W W C A 7 .1 V V V V NI V V V X A N IO `4 0 0 0 V 0 '0 0 CO D O CO m CO 0 O CO m CO V m c. o ✓ o Gn a W N 4.' O ID A r 7 K X X X r X C C C 7 b I. IS IS m m a z Z D X' N 2 r r n. I. n K 2 0 ZI O O O .I N M C m r m e n n o o .4 b o • C C N 7 N A A a = .4 b X b b A A K K H m 2 m m o m A o r 'p m x w N • r a z m z js I•I C 2 r I'• A a O b f• Z b r .1 r n A C m o • 'A M P1 M 2 D D X 2 0 n O N b m n Ar a •• oAm -1 C -112. r .. , •. n O O N N ,D y d N O 2 2 � O A O CO Co L. W X b O V r m C C CO m C W W r 0 o n o a O 2 3 0 %.0 2 r r N 0 CO X O •• P X O ti 41 •. •1 Ip kD 14 d N m 41 O d m m n 4- Vi K O O VI 4:4 `• A V N 0 A PI N.•4 0 m O A V V •. r N 0' O r O •• an V:, IC IS Is t 10 r r. r 0 0 A 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I n II O. W W IO 1` N W In. * O n ♦ r O. I... O r W OS O r m 0 ✓ 10 W GI W •• r• +i 0 O 17 z r O N N t O O . 1 1 1 1 1 I I f I 1 .4 P 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 o C O I.• r 4: W W W W N U W C7 2 P 0 0 0 0 (V O N 1' 0) L C W V O O V p1 W 0 O N m ✓ 7 0 A A m V O O O X r n b t_ O O 11 1I 1 11 II 1 11 11 11 11 7 C 11 II I 11 11 U d 11 11 b A II 11 1 II II II 11 II 11 O •s 11 11 I 11 11 11 11 II 11 m M 11 II 1 11 11 ft II II 11 II 11 I 11 II II 11 II 11 •• •• 11 II I II 11 11 11 11 11 r II 0 I II II 11 )I 1I II a D 0 II N N II 1 II N N II II r r 11 II it 2 A O) 11 O O 11 N N IN r 11 A P II N 0 11 4i W 11 r r 11 N N II V N O A \ 11 r r 11 N Ir I ON ID V O N N n 0 N ON 0 11 W W 6 10 0 11 b b C D W 11 • • 11 • e I • • • II • • 11 • • II • • 11 • • 11 • • II • • :: 2 •• HO N 11 O O ION ° a no O no O 11 N N II V V 11 m CO 11 N N •I H `� 11 O O no O I O O O It O 0 11 O O 11 O O 11 N N II N N 11 O O r ID 11 11 1 11 II II 11 11 If 1. O • • • ♦ • ♦ ♦ • • • • • • • • s • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ♦ • • • • • • • • • • • >< za p C A ro 3 A N Co a o m - o A y b ro a K m m a 7 CO a A 7C O 70m wet 3, zo .. .4 Pk n _ Z 017 07 m g C C Yo a m H GIn1 r* n w -c A m \y om b O A o a o n m o �1 b c n y 1 a O r a x c. c 1 x o ro a y A in a a A r � u •• b 0 u 7 7 11 C1 y 11 mm 11 Is II w •. .. 11 O L u . a a o 11 �I 33 A c Ito gA W n • z z .. •11 ctI 1 H P n •11 N 0 O • • • • • • s • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • is • • • • • • O R ro ^ 2 N C A 00 2 1 I A = A a 1 -C C O 1 A 2 A O '1 1 1 m -C 13r O .. -4 O - Y -t A I m 2 '0 m ‘ n N A I m C m ro S C I 1 r o I m A •• O n m l C C r .• C 1 E.,. .. m 1 S ❑ Y 7C n -1 m N '1 FL; 1 1 ,1 C .1 2 •.• -1 ti N O S , at Z 1.4 1`� m S Si Ca S C� m .+ n N S 1 N O N m t: 1y M C 1 A O 1 O A V ~ \ Z 0 1 m p a ,l z !� o w I =1 T .. 7' 11. n '11 1 b o -• n 1 < I 1 O 0o Y.1`\] m .+ � b .• S m I' I A A I• X N 2 r O m .b I r I m m M ••• 0 L V) Z A u�• } .(' m o a z z n l c -t o n �1 1i r A A O n I m 2 m m O K \t " 7C K m m c I N i a t � .. K -1 .Cd -I o S = a I• o No 9 x O � m 1 -1 1 C -n m -4 r A � • 77 •C D 1 C1 w w -1 Tt 1 m At., I m 9 1 A S N 1 G n -C -11 O 1 A -4 A m -C m O k O 3 1 -C m r a r 2 2 O 2 NNNNN��\` A y A S o r N a m m n1 W TOn2 , 1 m 2 m G b $ 2 2 b O C A r .. 1 1 � m 2 n A 4r a II CO C' C a 2 O a N 1 t� 2 N N -1 r n 'R m m •-t A o m H N w t hN m v N A n 2 C A A -C O •� A 2 .• O1 A .• O •• 4 1Z• I O N O 1 2 -1 11e3�� ►. N 2 O A C S A N ` r N 2 1J .-• . O A N -t O n •- N 9 9 i R R c T A b M I 1 1 m C b r r c - m IOC V O A 2 v Om .• o -t Z I C) O b r n -I O C• I .- 2 -1 o m .- A O C 1 b S C N l0 r -t S C 1 1 1C) 1\ A o .C t� a m •b m PCt C 1 Y A . h O T O 11 , c A n r 1 I C -I 'n 1 C m m 2 • ty - • 1 1 1 S b r O 1 1 m ro t1'V'1 A n n ••. A0 rh •~• z o❑ Ihc o m1 J,I.111 1 F O 1F C S A ro C • 1 A O !t I C rn A a Il 1(I: NOr., t I. I O m M w 2 I � OS n N m AA •• •• 2 A .- N N C 2 a .- m b I m a m .+ 2 Cu 1I1��(� 1 on � a m c I a K i i t z a m 4 m 1 m t a 1� 1 -4 2 m as AI A ! 2 1 I S C 2 I I • • m •- sc W 0 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 41 • • • • • • • • • • • • • all r • • • • • • • q O 0 N N N 0 0 N 0 1S Y CO Co on Co 0 CO Co co O 2 A b W W V: U G. W GI G: GI C A 9 O N 0 O 0 in N 0 Y. 2 A N r w r r r r r r r E D O GI GI W GI W W N N N m 2 O O t W N •' O 10 O V A •I 17 O t T n C n n n O C C O A T. C C 7 b C G 0 -C M Co C r r 4 -4 r r = rn o n m m .. .. r s - x o m n n M .. b O .c z O 0 0 I.I o I• O m m C n 2 D A A " O 7 G A 7C A m C C A 0 m o D O n ., o m a A co v -1 n n -4 n -1 A m O m M r 7 9 2 A _ -Cm -1 2 n n = O C -t O C n 0 O 9 = m N b A Z A O A m t D r ••4 � n •• •1 .1 n 27 O A O CC `QMC = 0 mac _ on Coo ti m n ♦ N -C A m •1/4...4 0 m •-• OA N N N N N N N N N N O T 1 I 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 n t P A * P a. A t t • G A a A ♦ A * + P J. ♦ t rtl 0 10 0 O O 0 0 O NO 0 0 '0 C 0 0 0 10 r 10 b 0 10 1O ti 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 a 0, 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O O �I V v V V v V V V V G 2 r to r I- 1+ r r be 2., L C A + A t 4... P t t a * = 1 I I I I I I 1 1 t 'O C Y = S. = = z x A in n n n n n n CI n n O A 0 VI N VI 0 N 0 N 0 N C. II It 11 It II It II U 11 9 O II II II II II II II 11 II A a II II 'I 11 11 11 11 11 11 O N II II II II II ❑ n n II m m II n II II It II U it 0 11 II h II 11 11 II II 11 •. •. It II 11 11 11 II 11 11 II = II b 11 11 II II II 11 it A A O II N N II II II r r It ❑ N N 11 to. so tl r so II N N 2 A W II .r r It a c 11 Co t W 11 Co Co It P 11 O O II 6 Co II O O ti 0 CI O 9 \ II O O II O O II O 0 r II O O II W t.C II O O 11 O O 11 O co 11 O O C 9 O 11 • • II • • II • • • 11 • • 11 • • 11 • • 11 • • 11 • • II • • a". 2 t 11 O O O 0 05 II W m. r II O O II O O 11 O O 11 O O II O O II O O H N II O O 11 0 N 11 W O+ V 11 O O II - •. 11 O O II O O II O O 11 O O d 11 II 11 11 11 11 II U II r O • 0 • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • al N N N N N co N N N t r (o Co C 6 C tD 6 C C Z A A C,1 W C,I td W W Ir W (4 C x 13 N N N tt N N o N N 3 x N r r r n r r r r n C A O A a a t a W 4 W IJ m z O a W N •• O •D 17 V C A 1 S W N C 3 " IT C N X 71 z b b m C •• -4 b { r r x .'7 x 7 r x -C A H m -4 C. S r O n 0 K •• C A_ N A .... r: y •. .. m •• •• m N C A r N •• m L m c rn K O - N C L7 O C x d ti x m -4 w Cn A w w r x m c N •1 S (a { 1.. s c r x _ o z b m •• m c z x x CI •• a r M x A I- D .C •. •. m z C m r A A r N ar r m -I N A M m A x r. Z -1 Oxm M m •n a r 0 2 O •. y _ H n C C KJ m C 3 O \ O = m n O w .1 ref . U) K x n \ .1 %0 in O A •• r N. r r r he 1/ , w is, T N N N N N N N N N N C A 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I n A A A A A A A a a a C n a a a a a a a a A a m O W W t4 (.1 L tr M •0 NO •O 4 C W W 4 CJ LA C.1 W W Kl V 't 2 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 H P P P 0 P P C 0 T P O V V V N V V V V V V G 2 r r r M r r C. C O O O O O O O a a a 3 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 110 O n n n n n n n X X - x m N N N N N N H n n n O x O m m m m m m fp I/1 0 c n X X X X X X N N N 1 I II 1 II 11 I 11 I S O I I II I II II I II I b A I I 11 I 11 11 I II I n . I I 11 I II II 1 ❑ I m m I 1 II 1 it II 1 11 I 1 1 11 I It a I 11 I •• •• 1 1 11 I It 11 1 11 1 r I 1 II 1 II (I 11 I A A O I .. r t 11 a A 1 r •. 11 11 11 W 1+ r INN s x •p to O IC a Ili N I . a 11 N N 11 A A •• •. lieu P P 1 O O O x 1 O O I N N 1 mi •• 11 N N III.* P. 11 (.4 W A A it O CC 1 O O C A O I • • I • • 1 • • a • • II • • It • • 11 • a a 1 • • 2 C a I O O 1 O O I O O 11 O O b O O 11 O O O O 11 O O O I O O •i H � 1 0 O 1, O O 1 0 O P O one O 11 O O 1 O O 11 O O O 1 0 O O I 11 1 II II !1 1 II I N O • • • • • • • It • • • • ♦ • • 411 • • • • • s • • • • • • • • • • • s • • • • • • • • • N g!/1 co, N N N N N N N r IC 07 W CO W m Co CO CO CO CO Z D A 4 4 4 W 4 4 W 4 4: C4 C A N 01 171 0 0 0 N an N N a 73 N •+ .. •. .- r .. 1+ M Y` N W A O N C H U N a a a a a FT Z O • 4 N ••• O 0 CO V 0 IP A -1 "Co C N F X '0 3 S e ? n b c r •-• r . m A m > x x a n a c K x x A r m c { m n N n m -1 r m N m ✓ 7C • N N •• A m a ., m • z o r a IT d G Z N 7C •-• m *-1C i N m N C A Z C T • N • --• n C m m • CO N 2 X' r x c ti C A m m A < m A 2 M Z. Z r H z b x •+ A m a m a N 7C Z O A a m -1 C r 1 x K K A r • - - N A x z o A m T A r- = C •• y w n 172 0 = 0 Cc CC, tlC 3 O \ n IT c .. o .• a m el a 0 K XI r �-t •G m c x r r r •- r 1. h• n r r TI N N N N N N N N N N O D I I I I I 1 1 I I I n a a a 1 a a a a a a a a n a a a a a a a a • • m o L. 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4: 4 '0 C 4 4 W 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 •• Z I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 M P N 0. b 0 0 P P 01 01 O V V V V V V V V V V CC Z l" r Irm r r r Si .. •• L C O O O O O O O O O O a I I I I I I I I I I ea cc n n n n n n n n n n '1j m N N N N N N N N N N C x C O C C C C o C C C /_ n n n n n n n n n n n ti t u r n ro o ` it I u 1 n u n A A It 1 11 I 11 li II C -I II I 11 I II 11 II m IT I II 11 I 11 II II II 11 t 11 11 II . •• •• I I II I 11 II II X I I 11 I II 11 it A 0. O N I 1 � •• It N N I 11 .-. I- 11 It 3 A 10 a N N IV CI I N N 0 0' 11 P 0 I o N lip O II 01 0 It Ir N O A O V V I P 0 I 0 a O O II 10 10 le O II Cl'. a II r n II O O C D O • I • • 1 • • a s 11 • • I • • 11 • • II • • II • • a b 4 4 1 O O I N N O O TO O I V V II N 0 11 b y hop V -• O O O I0 O I N 0 O O 11 O O to N 11 O O II N N 11 CO CO b 1 1 11 I II 11 11 1 4 0 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • it t Arai • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 4t C.1 C A 17 P tTl 74: 70 N .. — C a 0 In P r — o cn r A =I t N C 4 A O a ▪ 0 { , O m tit r r It a X . n C b 2 p A r •o • .1 r A ar. N a A A O A m II a r 2 0 .. ...i M n 2 7 O A O C C NO tr C w C ` 0 at Q M O M .0 m n ♦ Ol < A tT \ N IO It • o A ✓ II N o a I n ♦ o n ♦ m o -n u -o c •. W r 2 2 I D P O ✓ v C z r L C y O 3 O I '0 III S n A rn p w O A r n c n II It I b C u II If D D 11 el 11 0 ti .. 11 I. 11 It It 11 11 II II 11 II .• e. II W 11 II Y II w 11 11 a a O 11 .•0 II e+ M II N S AC II •-• II II ♦ O A 4... 11 •• II P N II O C a O 11 • II • • 11 • a 7 11 O 11 ♦ ♦ 11 IG H -4 %.% II U II N N 11 N NO II II II ♦ O • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • e E `-' V C W b ea N C A on A D S A b 1 K C b 1 D 2 -I O S W T K -13L c 0-4 1 W O W z W N M S 13 m 1 n N A l T C T O O 10� Z C 1 T, A 4- O n T, 1 O 2 O r .+ O I m O Q�1 3 V n W 1^ N 9 1 r -1t. -1 C W 3 w - -1 N O W - - o x J m x (t .. ° o S � er � 01 m � N Tr ;V CO C N n N I IIv N C 1 r o O I , m c �+ O -1 A c -1 I a 1 A O \ C b T I \ z c t m b a I Z I O K> {��, 1 'It P., X C I` Z O n Nit ' a C K I c N c ,yA m .+ I rom 1 I {{N s a i�� Y �n 2 1 G :Cr 7� tf'b, T v o r '\ v r b N a W r ro T w ° Tt .+ .J .. I c C ;::,7 z� 1 T i� W c m �: b O n m .. m a r O K K fi m C Z. N W D z m -4 a UN S O 1 O O — D 2 "I m -1 W 11 1 b n, rn -1 r b F -c in, 1 C r. -1 I m W x 1 m b X 'aN I C 2 n -c1 mf C 1 D W 7 M 1 K m O 1 O x 1 -- m r b x 3 3 C 1 2 IF teN X a O f N D m m m c T in n a m z a m A S 3 77O c x r .+ 1 I. m '- n b o x m c c c a z c b N 1 2 N CO W r n -‘1 A r m W A b in -. N m W .- N r n z a p A K b A 3 t. I P rd •. O •• W CM N D I 1 W A r N = C n Z4 1 C z ( � S W .- S N O b c" a m ICI .. IS nr. -I c -I .o m C b N .9 N O C b Z \ O 2 W X 47 Ik 2 y r N Z O 1+ W 1 O K M O I N 2 b N N \ .4 K b 0 T N+z m n c 2 A %C m r I X T O 2 O A .. C T r I C W a v I ,- O 2 -4 70 c 1 m � a ° O c1b X b N o r -i z b 1I M n a C1I ( ,� a ° { 1 am ro m 1� m C r0 2 b W0 7 O z c IC O X o P. 1 I 1 � C -1 T 1 c m. r 01 I • "— m .. . N nI I � •. W ro �1 mv.. D nA Ao « � � od1 F :I(� e O m= 1- m C nIII' 1bO :to ( S 11117 � � C S y Cx �+ b b D C1 W1cm mnH X .. ..z N t 04 z l b •. �DOm m 1 W I � - .o3 2 1 A NZ z 1 R mII / 2 1 b m o rt 40. z I X 1 st 2 I I G -1 z 2' 1 .�1 I : - fsr, a b N o • • ♦ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • o -I ro — 2 N O b O n ro 1 1 11 1 D S a a 1 < CO r I D 2 D o 4O 1 1 O 1 1 to-c X 1 0 -1 O -1 2 1 N 1 1 C fi 2 ro rn re. I n N AI rn c m ro S N 1 1ZI d 2 O I 2 A 0 el M l O y d m N d t\ �` 1 N c -1 3 r N O S 2 m O S m rn n w -1 fry b m A PI N \ O N 1- M N S N o N fi N •A O O A •~ \ 2 O �1 w >o O T 9 O 1 n b 1 O $N O m r ro � s m 4,4 d 1 1 m p O xV L 9 1 Vai A m -A+ 1523 ro k .. o z .. z a r 7D b A b >D Pi O -1 O 2 11 A �� rent b D O n rn 2 m a m O K O 1 1 Z rn G O N -t -1 C r 1 1 tl fi C 2 1N -1 D +1 S m -1 2 7J O S •- Z O !'Y 1 O X S D S I� O I T m 1 -11� 1 O '11 m -/ r D X 1 � m I 1 X K a 1 1 0 + r w 1 b AI m s n K �1 'R DI 1 A D `♦ a 77 '0X 2 2 I O 1 i 07 1 { rn 2 '0 1 1 " A r3i I a 2 tl r { Z m m m 9I O n 3 1 1 m 2 3 m 7C -1 2 2 !1 '0 1 c a r r r m z n a o m m 1 C z O A N p 2 N N -1 r n r X S m 1 m 1 •-1 1 o m r a m 1 1 •• N a n r In RI Al AI K I 70 2 r I D OP O o r - 1 1 I I m N O I I I -1 A I E. N X G O r o 1 O X i^ x -1 .+ x N z a N a m 1� .. .+ -1 O -1 -1 a 1 1 A N 73 N n N 2 S N 2 m 7D C 1 O b in. 1 1 1 or C1 O 2 1 1 L O t 1 N I S N .p N -1 a z �I I I rn I m m s a \ e +t Z ro m1 w00 _ \ aa• OS ; o nni .. aa a eo n9N r2 z nxiO6 Ofin ►1. O 1111 'n1• c m m z70�� { I Uzi ro � N 1 W b n n ti 13 b r 11 m z n In o t— e o m iv z o -P m x m o0i b - 2 N m m a'1 x 1 a N M N CIt N m „ N O C o ►. m �o m m m m Z to •• \2 2 -t I� Z b N Co m 21 es.t1 I a m � a X 2 1 m o z .- o • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 41 ai Cc m m CO m m CO z € �` W W 44 IJ W W (J W W C a 9 O N N N P P 0 P P 2 a N O O O O O O O O O tli a O P N N • 4 • 4 4 • m z O N Pk O .p m V CO N a A -1 S r a a o n n n o a S s o its as C s m r r A 9 r co N z r 2 A Pi A -4 N •4 z r r n a m N 2 2 A z o r X N m•1 b •. •a G1 a a m 1 s CO m r In 11 • O •C A C A r z C O 2 N b • a 2 a A f_ p m 9 A O C1 a C m A r m m i m 1i. A 71 m N 2 A N 1r 0 r A n r r r a m m r N m m O \ o a A ! r o A Na w a z •. o_ am N •• n z '1 A r N 0 2 e u y I M n z 2 O A O CC mmC 2 0 \0 2 2 r Nr •/ m n •O o -C A In \M )o m O A r r r r r r r r r Is. r r r P. 11 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N CI A 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 n 4 • • 4 ♦ • • ♦ • • • 4 4 4 H n • • 4 • • 4 • • • • 4 4 • • m • • • • • 4 4 4 • • • • • 4 9 E ✓ r r r r r - r r r r• r r r +1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 f 1 N P P P P P P P P P P P P P a O ✓ V v V V V V V V V V V V V m 2 r r r r r r on r r ►s r r r is C C I O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 2 1 1 1 1 1 f 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 S m A AAA A a A a a AJ0 A Aa A m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m O A O CI O O P 00 C) 0 C O OO I- II 11 11 11 11 II 11 11 I 'II C II 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 I A L 11 11 II 11 11 II 11 N 1 O •1 II 11 11 11 n 11 N 11 I m m N 11 n n U n 11 N 1 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 n 1 •• •• 11 11 II (11 P 11 11 N N 11 N r r 11 N 1 i II 11 N � •. II II • III NV V .• 11 N I A a O N 11 )4 N N N 11 N N 11 P CO 11 N N N N W w 11 N •• r N N N 11 P ' N N z A CO P UM OP P it P P 11 r r 11 N P P II r r 4O OO 11 P P 11 N IrA P p a \ O 11 • * OO 40 O Oro N 11 O 00 NV V 110 OO HO O 11 0 1 0 0 C A N • 11 • • • • 11 • • N • • 11 • • • 11 • • 11 • • • 11 • • 11 • f • • = 2 Ip O 11 P 000 11 O O 40 P 11 O OO 11 N P 4O 00 14O O 11 0 1 0 0 V V is. O n N N O O no O n co co no O 0 no O no O O no O 11 0 1 0 0 Ip N 11 11 n II II 1 11 11 1 M O • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • o N N a g m m m a 2 lc § a a a a W W W W W W W W C A '0 0 0 N N 0 •1 N 0 2 70 N O O O O O O O O to b O N a 0 N N a N N m S O t0 a V a a e W N b : b w 0 70 9 z r 7t w '0 71 70 O b m m O 2 9 a m V 77 r ; -i S < 70 { S •4 0 w -1 Z m 0 I° T r is 4.Z 0 m 0 -1 C N 27 IL 1 +I 2 b a a M co r 2 S c r m b t+ C _ to • 2 m S b i ✓ in 1» m z m c to m b i w N b Z 70 s t1 0 In 91 A r 20 4. -4 •w PI 2 0700 c c come 50 St.02 CD M N M wt m a O N K Z m �•I 10 m 0 7D M 4. r r Iw M M 4. 4. M M 4. 1• r m N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O b 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 f7 a l a e 1 1 1 a a e e a e l O a e a 1 e a a e e a ♦ e e ♦ a m 0 W W W t a l e 1 a a a e / ♦ .0 C b •p •0 om 4. 4• M M M M M 4. H I.. H 2 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • N a a s CO Co a a a a a a a a s O ✓ V V V V V V V V V V V V V Co 2 ✓ V t• t- •• V W 4• r M M M H IM I. C a a s O O O O O O 0 0 0 O O 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 St co H N •1 0 b 70 A >0 70 77 A A 70 A 70 m 70 70 70 m MM m m m m m m m m 0 70 A b b a 0 a O 0 0 O O O 0 a G. Z z z N N N N N N N N V0 N N N N N N N II bb 11 II 11 11 11 11 N It a H 11 It 11 11 11 11 N N m m 11 II 11 N N 11 11 N II 11 11 N II ll N N N P4 11 II II H II a a 11 ll II N IC 11 11 I/ No Ilr . 11 11 N N b b O 11 N 110 NNNN N a CO 11 N N 11 V NNN II 0 NN 11 N Y 70 m 1 11 IS. r. 11 ON eft 11 1 a a a a 00 O N N N Il a a a 1 UN ea 11 a O 70 \ `{ 11 r •• 11 a 00 ” 0 0000 N •0 10 N •• � 11 V 00V V 110 00 11 O C b N 11 • • N • • • 11 • • • • • N • • 11 • • 11 • 1 • • • 11 • • • 11 • 2 2 •0 1 II O O 11 O 00 11 O OOOO ISO a N a N 1I O. I O O ISO N O 00 N O I •1 •1 \ 110 O III C) 00 N O 0000 II W W it •0 •0 NO l 0 0 a NO 00 II O 1 V 11 11 11 11 11 11 I 11 N 1 N O I 1 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 411 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 4 m m z z w z a w w w w w c t s N N N 0 N 2 .'O N O 0 0 O o W. A 0 O 0 01 0 0 m 2 O r W N r O AK V z z 2 o w a le K M M 2 0 K r r N 1 m O n n b x a Si n a • z x o c N C r 2 m 2 r a z r a C K 70 Ili ft ft n r m o 2 2 -o a m m x z r K n a o Pm a z op to ro ;or H a ozrn o z nar n K z O rr r n 0 0 0000 w z opo r r r r r r w cc conic m o oTtr ♦ co 2o \'H2 W t ertO w w TN N ►. K W W W O S N W m n 004 W r O W N r N MM \K %O m OX r r r r V N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O 9 + 111111 l l l l l l l l ill l l l l l l l l l i �, ♦ O n rs r r 4. W V C O 0000000000000000000000000 O O O 10 KZ 1 1 1 ( ( 1 ( 1 ( 1 1 1 1 1 ! 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 K O 0000000D00000000000000000 P O 0000 0000 000 0000 00 000 0 0 A m o N NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN W N W r W C O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N O r 0 0. � 2 N M A M co Z O m P c z N 11 u n VC N N N N 99 11 N N a 0 -4 N N N N MM N N N N It n N 0 w •. N N It u = It N N N 99 O KO, * n ON r n n 2M W wO ON 01 rONCOK NOS l 0100+ 01 . •' W 000 U .0 r N OD W MO 01 O W O> CD N • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 11 • • ii • • N • • 11 • • = x V W N010 .004 # 0. r VOONf OOJOWJ` WNO W WOO Co 11 0 N Ho co tl O O Ito O K -1 \ O 0 • 000000NO00N OK0e0N010 Ke a n O O HO O no O NO O 0 N 11 0 n WO • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • N N N N M C7 CO CO CO 2 W W W W W C A 0 0 0 0 0 m a 0 a a a a a m 2 O O v a O ♦ 77 -4 9 730 ✓ r z a e O O r d -I In O A -I m b b a o m in o r z li -o to -i -1 0 1 N N N 41 O O O F A A z m w r m III D D N r r in N N m m m p 77 o ar C C 02 A A z O A m m m A -n A f N N z O .. .I w o O O OOO O o zz Oao O O OOO r r CC omC to CD V Co CO a a 2O \O 2 a a OOO W W ow N M at a r 000 N N nn V N K ✓ O ♦ O r a V 770 b m OP r r r r 11 N NN N NNNNNNNNNNNNNN N N N N N N N N 09 I IIe i w 4. bet I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 A1 ♦ ♦ ♦ r m O P. r r r r r 1$ O OO O OOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOO V 2 a SO a O a a a a a a a s a a a a a a a a a a a a a O ~ W WW W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W N N N N N N N N W 2 N r N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N •I WC a r r v r OOOOOOOO 2 1 M o A MN D GM W. ll II I 11 N 11 17O 11 11 II II N 2. 2. 11 II H II 11 0 M 11 II N II II 00 ' II II 11 II II N N II N 11 w » 11 H II N N 11 II N L N •I Si 11 h .. A D O n 0 a Ha UNr Om a NOD I"' r r r r 11P 10 W II .4 V II a tN 4a a 110 ♦ WNW mrrV NIO W N0 .4 4.6 o Be 4.. O2 \ N W W NV OO NO 0 NW N40 * N0N00 * *4N W00 no 0WaWoOw V N 11 • • 11 • 1 • • N • • 11 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • It • Z ` UV V NN 1 OO 4O a us N + r N00 + 00v0 Ove 11 N Oro •- W WON V ...4 \ 11 t . r Ow 1 WO II 0.1 V ha ON N NO OOO N000 . 0 II V OOONNm O O b N N 1 II N N ♦ O • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 4 m m g CON m Coy m 2 a f 4l W W W W W W W Cl C A b N 0 N N 0 N N W N 3 A N O O O O O O O O O co 9 O ✓ N V V +1 V N V OA rn Z O ✓ 0 N I or N se O NO A / b D 70 A x 0 w m 9 O 9 -1 m 9 13 77 N rn -1 O 4 RI N C7 7C 73 • '0 9 i rfi rn w N N rn 9 A O n S •• o g -/ CoC n O K i 2 N A -c X C a 2 ►• rn N 0 3 9 -1 O co '0 9 t Z m r X 70 9 A C O 2 Cl S 9 -1 m c 7, � 9 2 -( In z T N Y r r •• o w • r • 2 IT n 0 9 It •. N 9 C A2 w O A m H RI 7s .. .4 .. n Co COO0 cc mmg W 0 b 2 C \0 S as ssf CC imN mn Oa .C P O1 V A In ••••••4 to m O A � r r or rre Si r M Is r Is r r 71 N N N N N N N N N N N N N O 9 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 n ♦ ♦ t ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ a ♦ t ♦ ♦ On ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ r . es ♦ 'ernR 1+ r r r .• r M M r 1- r r OS O O O O O O O O O O O O O -1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 t 1 -1 Ok CA CT 0% O. O. A P O• a a oI a O W N W N O N or W Y N N N 1. m Z W r tJ U 41 W 61 0 O r r r sO t C ♦ N ; W W W ± N N N O O N 1720 N N N n A m y N N Z ` A N 11 11 11 11 11 11 II II II it O 11 II /1 II 11 II 11 11 O 9 D 11 11 II 11 II 11 11 11 11 0 -1 11 II 11 11 n 11 11 II 11 m m 11 11 11 n II 0 11 11 11 It it II 11 11 II II 11 II N w II 11 11 11 II II W 11 11 2 II It 11 11 II II O O O 9 9 0 11 11 11 ti 11 11 W r b 11 II 0 •. + 11 • r 2 A O/ ft t ♦ 11 IO 0 II U W 11 N N N r 11 W 4 11 O N to 11 N N 11 N W 0 11 W t4 O 70 N. COat N II Co CO 4I,11 ♦ ♦ 11 O O N II Co Cc 1/ NMN II N O1 11 10 -1 I- n 0 O 9 N 0 • • 0 • • 11 • I • II • • • • 11 • • 11 • • • 11 • • O • • • • • • Z Z vO 11 O. Os II Cr N HO 1 O II O 0 VO VD 11 O O 11 N O. P 11 ♦ in x 0 v CO 11 O O H -1 \ 11 O O HO 1 0 HO 1 0 n (0 N N N tt O O O O 430 ON N N I. Ow. VC) O IO 11 11 1 11 I 11 tl II 11 It it N O • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Illi T T u, u• ui u u• N W Vt 3 A N O G O O O O O O C' p O Co Co Co W Co Cc V d r Z O Cm t W N r o b Cr X N y 7 7 S X r r is b A O D C to r T 9 9 p H N H D a -C 71 -0 D D n N r1 RI ✓ — r T z F D -Ni r n n — c m - .. C f^ A N r" O y f- r.. n c n A L N r r C n •. H O Z C n .. S C F n _ r C C fr ti , . C r- C N -C n .. > O n G O X R y c C 7 ✓ A X C C .. C F • n It a r n m r n .. O r C R fn n � • 71 D r 7) o • 'a a .. y .. C1 p O C C O z C O C G C G G r C Li. •.:' C -. G t C Le c. c Nr44 P. ,0 V K . -. \ -1 G x' -. -. -. ► .- .. .- . r1 •I. r_ r11 1 •1 •I I rl I I r1 r J ! - 1- i 1- 1` f C 2 2 1` P - f r F > ♦ v O ! C C n n l L 4- L- - . -. I- r — r r r -. n -. r .. r 7 .. 4 _, II V t r 7 2 2 r r .. O D o D c m m D 9 F H N H D C .{ M -4 4, D D n N 17 RI ,' 2 r 7, r 0 r A P° D -4 n A S Cr m = 1 C r. D N m n ✓ r r n o n A D N O r 7 C n I. -I r c. X C n, .. S 2 A n b C O m -C r ✓ > 2 N t O N n c v A M L C t X' r z Z o c r c p • n -• o r y r rn O w ►. 0 D N n h. _^ 73 2C •y •-• O n CAm m r* z • -n To .7 o z o .. -4 n _ c o c c c r c 0 o c c c c c r c U sC G � It O \ C 2 G G -se G •. N r -4 1 � r V N K C N. _ r \ N V ni N. N. .. G S N C .t 1 I 1 I 1 1 i i I I I 'I I I I I I n 2. r r r r r J r r J r J J ♦ d J. r l c- f? ✓ r . r <- r J r 4 r 0 s 4 r e r r p •••• .- � .. C G C .. •. C ti I I . l I I t i t t 1 t I / -• ' C C C - a. L C .. .. _ ._ _ . .. � - _ _ . - Ai . . .. a n a .. .. . . .. . __ —.�L n.._. u_•__• r- .. _ 07 07 m 0 'CN7 m 2 7• ,,. ,.... W W W W W W W W C 717 Q 0 01 O N tit N O N 2 A N O O O O O O O O IC A O a CO W CO CO CO V V m 2 O N ♦ W N r O 0 CO A ai A 9 O A C m •-• m r 9 19 1 + D A n N m to a 2 r 7C m y f1 A p 2 2 a m A N M O A r A n O n A A a o r 2 t o r .4 M -I O A C n r a 2 S A n 7 A C CI o m mi m v Z. X w K o N n Co O A m A O ro A r a 2 SCI C • A V N > • 2024 m O m ..1 r 021 ..y 2 w n r 2 _ AMC 2 • T OA M m y A N , 2. 11 r • : a r r is M 0 o a o EE umg W .0 O V 2 O \02 Y 0. Co V Or Nr V r wOOM sO N O V A m \V b M . r r r r r r r •. * O A N NNNNNNNNNN N N N N NN N OA 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 n t ♦ ♦ w ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ MO r r r r r r sr r VC O 0 O ~ I 1 1 ( 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 II 1 M 0 00000000001 0 P 0 0 00 P O W W W W W W W W W W W W 01 W W to O W In 2 N 000000 % 470 % 0 W W 01 W W N 4C V •' r W N b WW W 2 . ro m AM OM U 11 II 11 II II 11 11 '0 p II 11 11 II II 11 11 A A 11 11 11 11 H H It O V 11 11 II 11 H II 11 m m 11 11 11 11 II II 11 H H H H H H H .. .. H H II H H H H Z II 11 11 11 II 11 It A A O Hr 11 11 11 N 0 11 ow mm 11 = XI 0 N 11 V Hr r 00 N HQ W NW W HO 00 Ur r O22 \ r HO II 00 O II 00 II 00 O H 0 0 11 r O O 11 N O C A N • 11 • • • • • • • ♦ • • • II • • 11 • • It • • 11 • • 11 • • • II • • 22 0 O O 0000000000 HO O HO O HO O HO O OM 00 HO O VV \ H O 11 O 0000000000 HO O O HO O O HO O HO O O HO O 00 HO O O 0 II II 11 II II 11 11 0 O .„.. i A _ . .. __. _._ .._ .... . . 41 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •. X 4n co Ol CO m m m CO m Z W W W tr W W 1.t td C 2 ro CD W N N a 0 N to 2 70 N O 0 0 0 0 0 0 o to a o vO 10 f0 W Co Co W W T Z O N r o b CO v a O A -• ro 0 0 0 en 0 0 Iron L A 2 N O -C N N -1 9 m r a O 2 K T m 91 Z r a • A m m N Is O N N A n A a N V -I a 2 r O T m N a -, r m ro A a 2 0 2 K 73 0 m a a r CO r of C7 N n 2 ' Z M -1 Z a 0 CI a x f O N b Ir o 2 m Ta4- Z 0 w y 4-4 CD 00 0 0 0 2Zo CC amC ca OM Pi 2 o �0a co fife Nor -1 ✓ CO V It t1 V N at W $0 a` 0 m \N 40m r r r r r r r T O p N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O a .• • • • a • p 1 1 ( 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t1 C el • •• • • ♦ • m0 0 ✓ r r r r fife r » ro C O r » o0 0 0 00000 1x II I 1 1 1 1 1 I l i 1. 1 1 I l l l l M a a a as a a as aaaa Of 47‘ 00 pp.. O (J W W W tJ tJ tJ W N N N W N W W W fa W W Z r W a 0 a r M 0rrrNr 0000 in I. C ✓ 0 0 0 $0 r r 0000 •- O 0000 $0 2 ro is N z A in 0 X O X L 11 II 11 11 II II it ro 0 11 11 11 tl 11 11 11 a a 11 11 11 II II 11 11 O y N N H u N N u m m II II a 11 11 II 11 II H II 11 H II 11 fi. fifi N N N N to a N u H r N u u N .. I. H H N a s o 11 11 11 11 O O 11 ♦ • H 1/ 2 2 Oa Ps 11 V d 11 vO .0 11 r r 11 O o NO co N tr r r 11 a r » Ca Co 11 r r if r r He O ♦ II O O N V V 11 V • NN • NO 11 of 0 000 0 C D N • 11 • • II • • 11 • • • N • • 11 • • N • • • • • • • H • 1 • • • • • Z Z tO N HO O HO O N ♦ N N HO O 11 N N 11 N O co a V V N HO 1 0 0 0 0 0 -4 -I \ a HO O HO O 11 V • W 11 O O 11 co tp N ♦ 043 (4 •400 ii c) 1 00000 b 11 11 1 11 II 11 11 N 1 J O • 0 • • • • • • • • • 0 • 41 41 • • • • • 0 0 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 4 a a a a a a a a 2 a w Co to w w w •.1 w C A 9 a a N a a a a a 2 A N O O O O O O O O CI 9 O 40 V 40 a a a a 10 m 2 O a to V a a ♦ w N A -1 2 X Z 2 C -1 m a b n m to rn 9 A A n 9 O A A r 2 Z Pod Z K CO O CO O 9 N 9 m X S 7C 2 9 11 rn I r n m M A rn 2 O 2 Z O A m -4 9 A O A q 9 A 2 K A r CO A 2 -4 9 2 ~ a x 9 t rn C O •.• O X. N 2 n o O r m a n 2 2 m w A A n C 9a rn .. N9 n 70 s 1~tl a 11 In 0 a � A z .. .. M if • • N O r V n 10.. •O. �O. 22 O A p w m rnC ♦ ♦ a w r 44 w w w 2 7 0 0 \O 0 .2 V V • V V r N rw NN m Nisi -• a a O CO r CO N + V • m r n N) N ! w N V a Co a O a a N A rn \-I IO rn r 1+ r A. r r r r r r •- ell O A N NNNNNN N N N N N N N N N N O 9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 n • ♦ ♦ • ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ C n ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ • • ♦ • • • ♦ ON CAI M r r r r r r r r r r 12 C w 006° 008 O O O 0 r O OOOO -/ Z 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 H a a a a a a P a P P CO P a a a a a 0 ✓ aloes CA ii, l0 w w CA 44 W w wwww m 2 r N ♦ N N ♦ ♦ w a A. to N a rrrr C. C. O OOOOOO O o r r r r r N N 0 S fit 73 A A No A m z E b N 11 11 1 11 11 11 II 11 11 y 0 11 tl Il II N ll It II 9 9 11 II 11 11 II ll 11 11 O m 0 11 N II 11 11 11 is rn 111 0 11 t1 It 11 11 11 N H 11 11 11 11 11 II 11 •. w 11 11 11 11 1I r 11 11 p. _ II 11 11 11 II • 11 11 N 9 9 O 11 r r 11 N r 11 N r r 11 r • V It 11 Is. r 11 r S A on 11b 10 11 .0 rOr In, V V 1I • ♦ NO O 11 iC N ♦ 11 • • Ho O 11 V NN • a O A \ 11 N N It V NNr Po V 11 O O HO O II N Oro II a a 11 a in 11 • .4 in Nr C Sr N 11 • • 11 • • • • • • • 11 • • It • • 11 • • • II • • 11 • • 11 • • • • • 2 2 Co 11 O O HS O V OOYI N 11 O O 11 O O 11 O 00 'IN N 11 CO CO II CO NCR OV * -i \ No O It •G NVwNr ►. II O O 11O O II O OO II r r no O Na as N04 •O 11 11 1 11 11 11 11 11 11 Co O • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 41 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • f xZ > C A ro 2 A N ma o rn Z O � A •• ro 4 p t m ' m • s t s r p t 1"as AM NAt O A N "fl Z O « y w f1 22 oA CC CD C 2 q \ax O w N w y m A W N •C A m \y b M O A ✓ a n v m o o ro 9 C w y = 2 M a q r m = � e y 2 q ro v y A T a o A ✓ � u ,• ro v n 21 3> M 0 y Is PH m u n w •. « n N ; 11 ft a p O 11 y Y A O 11 N O A \ u •D C 2 N H • 1 Z Z 10 11 N 1 y y \ 11 V• 1 p 11 1 10 O • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1 y 1 +1 fr. K 2 a. 1 t. .. I -. _. r. 1 r 1 m 3 9 m 1 A N Z t m c m b S O I t�� x I O 1 m A - In O n m l O 2 b r r. O 1 1� r In I -I 1 M G M 1�'`� 2 w H I -i N O � N 42 Cit. S m Y .. m Y m m N \I 1 2 1 r m � QI M U 2 N \ O N (1 n N S 1` w C O N -1 "0 O ti S r O 1\ b A 'n 1 \ Z O 1_ Qzt 2 G d H 1 1`� T N r 1 z C T. ��../ ' 4 O T A 11 .C 1 e.1\ b N O � m � v 1 ..� •• m I 1 1 '�] A X N 1 C C • m A '� _ r 1 1 m 9 a { w r b l w a 9 - 11 2 \N \\ m � C A :0 A A n t; ti O S A ?'! C n la . M Z MI m C K M1 X -CI fry co 1 \. N 1 K T C b + }. 1 t. -1 m -� f� C '.' -11 Iff��" f:l -i -11 I O m M r A ti 1� x K A 1 C r r +t -1 1 1.� .m -•1 A�I\ 1 m A I X ID N 1 1 C Y n K f` 1 an O 1 9 K 1 r$" I 1� K M O 1 S.� O 2 f K M r D L 3 3 Or I 3 bf }] `. 3 b r N9 r. n m r a v T G n 3 C 1 rt 2 m A X 3 Z C 1 C x r ,+ G. I^ .. 2 n D O A m F' p C A 2 O D N , r 1.- � 2N -4r P1 M D r r r y I C IT. .- N _.ra h r -1 N A n -2 C F „ K C IX S 3 ri- f+ Iv y x .. G .. 1 C 0-� b I 2" b V 3 C 11 0` tV w. `- p N 1 O. f*. C v S V' r N 7 N r r -� t C d II+ K T. 2 � LI 1 r ` .. I p O A T ^ I r C T k �G r s C t p r r I. C. w C C z r \ n c a r tr T, e C jt �Ci S V Vi W r 1 r-.. 1 1 Ii 1 b { I `1 .. ... ti I 1•"� 1 G C h" :; w r 1� ( 1-.-_ C� � I� G S �. l � r m y { . . c C + t,' 1 . 1 - Ir - 1 ..,�- - ,..\ , _ - , . A . S • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1 O •M b ++ p 2 1 I 1 4 m < b X "i t m � 1 .4 O Z. i K N 1 I 1 m 2 17 m r n N 701 m C M 'V S O 1 I CO X I a 1 m 70 •. 1 OO n m I o z o r w O m l z 1 M C �1 1 \ 2 M '�1 1 N O .y rn N '9 1 r rn pi. co 2 m \Vihw01 m A w N \ C N n co I` m m w o -i 4o o �1� 1 .A ^ O 1 o a 11I \ z O I� T G 1 z o 11 1�' ro o n i � 1 I 7O7 a o X N 21 I o m 1 1 n 1 1 m "0 O '0 r a N Z• a 1 r b -1 w O 21 w A We (!\ m a a 70 A A n O K tl b T 1 a x o m z m m o ' X K m C O 1 N -c -. O1 1 4 O Y 2 O 1 O 2 O 2 a S O 'N m .d -+ i b m -1 r D • 4 1 •m -i K A i m D 1 70 '0 N ~ S 1 07 2 n K tit b 1 A -1 A m 1 I K m 4 O = 1 2 K m r a X S Y O 1 2 `3 R1 70 w I A 2 O r N D m m m m O n 3 1 1 m 2 2 m 70 t z s � O i c 70 r 1 g ItM • I l w m z n A 0 70 m 07 07 C A 2 tl A N r l I 11 m m -/ D b m w N ~z3 In 4 : N A n 2 0 A A < O 1 A 2 •n n z w o •• =1 m N O t 0 1 1 a D Z N 2 C n 1 O 2 1 I S N w S N 2 O A O a N F Ill N O . C A ►4 �Cf CY Da 4 44 40 0 D 2 rl �R: x b N n \~ K Pksstt m b x A �C m 1 1 z A a m ~ I O m x o 070 0 O 70 r n I --Ii o Z W . .- z -4 omo C 402a Ns0 r K z 0i it: a o K 1� a m m O 2 O �O O 70 CA1 w J� /•— m K T c m m z ` ` ti. .. •. ti M n a n ti: CI -+ 790 1 t C fO' * w A 0 la Ii x Z. m c nK _ a A c� C• A O 1 C x 70ybfJ 27 2 O b Nm m -I S O S n N m 70 2 •• •• S A •• L :S N 4 C m m IN .A0 2 m I 4 141 C I1I - w ISm m m m l 2 ..t11 `� z x. m p., m ml a f all z m w A ' z 2 � • 2 O 2 tet w •• NO O O • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 41 • • 0 ei • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ® • • • • • b ti b a 2 In o a o A 1r A I a S D 9 I K C CI D X D O r o I -4 m K b r I CO r I K o •l 2 -4 l/1 C I In 2 D m A N A l m C m VI r!� 2 C 1 rn b a I o A m l c 2 O r •• ti I n .- O -Y F 0 ti m N K INx�I �1 < ti 2 n H a CO O 1 \ S m s r m o x m 0 n \�1� A •n al rn• m N m WI r N \ n N r N s N c N m W PI m .. o o n o -4 S 1 I z o 4 9 T 2 O .7 1b T ►0 b � O T I � b O •+ A 4. , DI 1R Q4c N o m r b .. x m c 1 m ro o 1 *0 z a I A N a m 1 b T + n p r D MI A C r a z 77 z SO •1 o m T A m D f,' A O A m 2 m471 O K O A K u m C C is N K � < o ?' Sn m z {q� r a r.. s ' 0 a - 22 0 I I� o o x D s o ‘4 T r -4 w p\ I c T m -I r D ! m S K 9 f'� I c •- r •1 a z 1 r -I zk 1 m a l I z b v, z 1 c - A K M o f I D -4 D b 73 0' 1 K M C I, v` C s S K m r a s 2 2 C K 2 b k '', IA z r D 2 C r < Z. M m In I T O 024: m 2 1 2 m o •1 2 2 b � C S r r � r m A 9 O C O C B o 9 ' N 1 2 N 1 N -4 r r1 r 73 rn m ti 1� p m n y I I m -I 1 N 9 A r to z S K M'� z 2 r z •• n o n 1 Y_Y m N O 1 1 D (y 2 N 2 C O 1+ Ez 1 c 2 H 11�� •. x y 2 a N 9 m r r NL� H O •/ •1 H o N 73 N O , S C D r m m i I H z N S r v. z 5, I -I O O S M O 1 N N CO N ' 1 1 � 2 •i �1 ��J'� m m o S D \ C ' 1 Q p m o ld X 1 r G T ]G 1 '� G -1 d •• 2 1 z 'a o m I •+ o -� z i....447411 D n O z r I A � O p 10 F •- Z N O m �• D O C O K �0 S O N .0 r ti Y O � 1 M A 9 s n A t` ^ 1 a o < I D m 'p m m I 1�1J Imo' m c 1� R a -+ �o ICj o O I(, o z 0:5: n o I C :r T 1• C m m 2 7D I • m K • 7c N O 1 D n j n T A o • a -� o zn '1/41 = x 1 � m c a b D � n C b I S o 47 � C s z D : z o m o a � N m t 1 O c t 21 El •+ m b y O. C i m 1 n 2 07 I •+ MI MI K 1 S Co I COI 21 1NZ a m • ml mI a1 � -i Z t^ • M I XI 7. I I S C Z s I 1 I • • m. OA < • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • tee - _ • • • • • • • • • • • is • • • • • • • • • • N N H N N N N N N N IS ! Co CO m Co w w m w Co m z a a W u tl u u W u u W C4 C p N N N Cr. N N 0 0 N 0 3 p N «. .. .. .. r .. .. .. .. .s m a 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m ^ 0 10 0 V P 0 ♦ W N � O p -1 ro ✓ r r r n o m n m p D C C m o a 2 o m O D o 1 t p 2 p in p 2 O .< C N D 2 N n 3 o D A M C Is 2 a D .I H04 C h m m z r a -. c .+ N a o m 0 D 0 m. Z 2 m 0 m • T -I z x. n c a K r o K x a r- r . m r, r -c a a r r r n z r ` x0 z _o x z a 1 m O a p 1 r- 0 c a m a a a cn p p C a x r • N D m xi tl p m m T a r 2 0 .. ., M A c c mmC 2 C %. O Z DJ H 41 M 1 M A •• N K XI m \ 1 10 1n O p r r l& r •• Is r r is, r 71 N N N N N N N N N N O a 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 n A A ♦ ♦ a ♦ ♦ ♦ A ♦ 0 A ♦ ♦ ♦ r ♦ r ♦ ♦ ♦ at m 0 u u w u u u w u u w v C u W 1.1 u W W u (a 41 V 1 2 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 P P P P P P P P P P O ✓ V V V V V V V V V 6 2 O O O O O O O O O O a I I I I I 1 I I I I M CI n n n n n n n n n r r m 0 o N N 0 N N N N m o x o o o a c o O O a L n n n n n n n n n I 1 I 11 H II 11 II 11 1) O I I I 11 11 II II II 11 a D I I 1 11 II II II 11 II 0 1 1 1 I n 11 II 11 11 11 m m I 1 I 11 II II 11 11 II I 1 1 II 0 II II it 11 .. •• , 1 I I II 11 11 11 11 II L I 1 I II 11 11 11 11 It D D O •" lc.) u 1 1 11 tl II II 11 A N N 2 'A 0) N 1 O O I P P 1 CO m II P a AN N 0 m Co 11 a P AN N 11 N P O A 44.,.- O 1 0 O 1 0 O IC O 11 V V Om N 11 N N II O O O N N II ♦ ♦ C D Oi • 1 • • 1 • • 1 • a 11 • • 11 • a 11 • • 11 • • 11 • • 11 • • 2 2 •r O 1 O O I O O iv V 00 N HO 0 HO O 11 O O 11 O O ANN 1 1 v. O leo 1 O O ICI M 11 O O 11 O O II O O II O O 11 O O II N N .0 1 I I II 11 0 11 0 II 6• O • • • • • • • • • • • • • 41 • • • • • • • 41 + • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • :III N N N N N N N N N Ol T. X Co m CO CO CO m CO O Co CO 2 A A W W W W W W W W W W C A 9 0 0 O N 0 O is N N N 2 A N r r r 1.. •. 4- r H O A O r r r •. r r r r r O m 2 O Co J O. 0 a W N r O .0 A •I S P b 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 V O A C O O r n h 9 A D , O C r A ^' r n 0 to A K A r r m m r O S n F m h .. ;tI 2 O N A M A C M O A O O 9 7C N A M C r - 2 V r 2 m N m < m m m p., z o z z .- < b •' .� C C K N •• N 9 N -1 r S N � 9 Z S A x 9 m "0 C O A 2 n 73 A A 2 r m m z m O A r r r r r < r r m r r o m s m r 9 A < A 73 m o A •. m 2 7C C A s 2 0 2 z Ax O m x m r N A N 9 m A r 2 0 73M on RI A I- X 0 .. ..4 M n 22 OA 0 , C C Moot 2 O \O ; Ct n W M .1 m n ►. 0 K A m \ ti •D it O A r r r r •. I.' r r r T N N N N N N N N N O A t a t t at a a a a O n a t t a a t IS t a m 0 W W (: W W W W W W M C W W u u IV W W K is N 37 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I m V V V J Ni V V V J IA 2 w r r r r .0 r r w I. C O O O O O O O O O 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 '0 Ib n n n n n n n n n A m N N N N N to N N N O A O C O O C O O O C L n n n n n n n n of 11 i II II II I 11 II 11 1 11 9 C 11 1 II II II 1 11 II 11 $$ A A 11 I. H u 11 1 n 11 11 11 n -I ll I u II it I Il II il 0 m m 11 I II 11 II 1 II 11 11 11 11 1 II 11 11 I 11 11 11 11 •. •• II I II 11 tt I 11 u u II T I I 1 I I 11 11 I u ill V 11 9 A O 11 1 11 II r n II r 1 r r 11 if N N 11 .• n it M 2 A co 11 a a let N It O O 11 O O UN N INN 11 Co O II O O 11 0 O 11 N O A \ II a a 1 0 O is O O 11 O O II O O 1 .. r 11 a a no O u P P tt O C A G 11 • • I • • II • • 11 • • 11 • • I • • • • • 11 • • 11 • • II • 2 Z r. 11 N N lo O 11 O O 11 0 O 11 O O 1 N O IOW W 11 O O I I N N I I O 1 ti \ II r 4- 1 O O II O O no O 11 O O 1 O O u V V no O it N co It 0 Ch 11 I 11 11 11 1 11 11 11 II N O • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • H N N N N N 0 N X Z p7 tr co b Co 2 m m 2 A A W W W W W W W W C A A O O O N N O In ul 2 77 Cu y y r M I+ Y Y ... w A O N N N N N N N n m 2 O O N t W N •- O O 77 ti r r G C -4 N N N A A r m x C -+ 2 m A A a z m z to .• r d m m O r 2 A •1 2 m .. r 2 m X S A m w A •. 77 m •. o 4 m 77 m lit to m o •.4 C x o s of c. m a b n z -c r t r 2 r b m K r C 2 C Z r A A r x z V 7C ✓ — .. .c m m Ar N A A r O A It 11 A r 2a •. y it. n C C /p m C s C 'IV P2 C w W •• .y M r0K zm kam O A .. .. .. .. rrI. .• -n N N N N N N N N O n a a ♦ ♦ a a r a o n r a a a r w ♦ ' m a T W W W W 4: W W W -0 C S. W W W W W W W W -I t 2 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 -t r V V V V V V V V a 2 ... Is r .• .- n r .. (- C -i O O O O O O O O 2 C 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1) to —1 n n n n n n n n m m L N N N N N N N N O F r a a O O O O O O 4. n n n n n n n n II II 11 11 II II II 1 11 ti A C7 II II 11 11 11 II 11 1 II It A A II 11 11 ti II II 11 1 11 11 O -1 II II II 11 11 11 II I II II m m it it it it it it it it it it p it u u it it it it •• •• 11 N 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 A 11 .. II 11 II II 11 11 II II r A O. II a II It N N ll /t .- .- 11 n. II r om. 11 u.. .— 11 3 77 W 11 V II 1p 1p 11 O O 11 P C II O O II ♦ ilt, II P P 11 O O It P P a A lI .+ II O IA 1: O O II O O II N N 11 O O 11 O O II O O II .� .r C A 41 11 • II • • II • • 11 • • II • • II • • 11 • • II • • 11 • • $ '- .i• II W ll a ♦ II O O II O O 11 O O 11 is V II N tT II O O 11 co co ti t \ Il V II W W II O O II O O 11 O O II a a n O O 11 O O II N R A 11 II II 11 11 11 11 It 11 W O. • • • • • • • • ♦ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 . C. T 2 � 3 N b A b C7 A I D = A D 1 K o O 1 A 3 D O ro p •-• 1 H O K 7 K O m m X 2 m n N A I m o m -t, = O Ns •„ r 1 b a rl 70 1 \ O f1 m 1 tl Z tl r' 9 Z p I K M N M. r R -4 C y = n N O K _ IPm m O I-00 %. 00 o 1\` C N 1 -i � m N m 70'� C I I1n` 1 __ A w O O b 11 I \ at O I� Z I� iN � � w a X. tl M � i � � o � � 1 • I. K I : no ?k A C \ C,1 N Z IO m A1 C 1 1 m L' Psr =so -TI I sr 0 A ti S A w1� � bz A F n 4 -1 O b T 1 A A �' m o n m S m m � C K 1 -\ii � � i O % 1 o Z m � br oK r a Yr o m m -4 a C - S K a 1 N " " K -4 n K b 1 m D I 70 O D X ,2 n Mal X- m -c m o U . o s 1 2 t m r a r 71 1 70 .. ti e.° Die r N � � m m m W IF�_J = m Z 3 '0 O C 70 r w •1 m n t` m Z M D O 70 m 1"' V N -1 r f! 71 b r O 07 C b 2 C A N 3 Nn re m m -I 70 � O m r N M !� x) � N r O « K V A >0 K O A 3 ►� ! CO y`r m N O H D 1 ti w S N ' 07, 0 A I C7 D x Zw. - O M P a z 1 -4 73 a y � a N o 1 r N Z ca PI P1 o A N //� T b 0 N < . D S i TO I NPR m R; P S b •3 m I- p m O 2 OA • 1 •. C 91 Z' �' C H Y O Z 2 OM .. p 1 z , .� 0 x � r m D o Cc p e �D S b N �O r K Z b 41 1� Co C K 1� 3 m D N IC "O o _ o IP O m a z 1� V M T i C N a \ •- y y (J� m m I\ I z O K X O 0 0 t .. a c 1, 1 D P Z I� G 0 F 9 O.. 2 v r. • D C.IJ Z N a '� Z • �1 v T m m K = O « �. � 1 S N m _ A D A N rw m O = S b .• m b Ill « z m 1 .. .• CO w1 os1 al K la Z b m cis ml ml b 1 r z m x z 1• m tl ? O 1 , • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . Zo-o-va/ 4.2za • r 61/ 5/90 W ;C' MEMORAR1DUM i woe Clerk to the Board August 27, 1990 To Dee George Goodell, Director of Road and Bridge COLORADO From Road Opening Stanact: The following road was August 27, 1990. It was closed July 31, 1990 for a bridge replacement: WCR 84 between WCR 25 & WCR 27 I GG/mw:frc xc: Commissioner Kirby Weld County Dispatch Weld County Sheriff's Office WCR's 25, 27, 84 v760,0q,�' fits MEMORRn®um To Date Clerk to the Board August 29, 1990 COLORADO From George Goodell, Director o£ Road and Bridge Cr-P/mix) Road Opening sub}«t: The following road was opened August 29, 1990. It was closed August 27, 1990 for railroad repair: WCR 17 between Hwy 34 & WCR 60 1 GG/mw:frc xc: Commissioner Kirby Weld County Dispatch Weld County Sheriff's Office WCR's 17, 60 w . ' STATE OF COLORADO •:BEF'ORE T.BE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT •, DWISON OF LABOR APPLICATION FOR HEARING AND NOTICE TO SET %7 G)adr ba tid501. . . ',t • •w.c. * 0- -14141 542. Claimant, VS. Weld eOurri elnojdo "Carrier x "- Employer, and/XIS- ntl / IS- Intuited - -. ss x 560-��- (2.753 insurer. v /� y Respondents • The GIaI,mant v� QaIl1.7` thereby requests a hearing at: Denver,Colo.Spgs, Ft.Collins CD Pueblo. IC4,ment.L,npoY insure° Mirth.ono - Grand Junction, Durango.Glenwood Spas,concerning the following issues: '; (CheCk Only those iSSueS you wish decided at this hearing) _Compensabitity , ' _ _Major Medical Insurance Fund _course and scope _statutory employer 1VOCattonal Rehabilitation /Temporary Total Disability - _Reopen Claim ilaols5 and ea'rlinuing _Death Benefits , teen or time in duptann ,_dependency -.r....,.. LT"; fary•Partial Disability 2_,. payment to Subsequent'lnjury Fund '10(05 and Poni-inuing ..�,. ';peso or time m dispute) �Disfigurement Benefits' ' }v,'._l. ". v Permanent Disability Subsequent Injury Fund Liability- ; permanent partial • . ,,.- ,.. ,:Vt d Insurance COvtlrage' .1): ::G i.2..,: .-.r'..,- permanent total ' _alleged MMI date _Penalties - -- ' - safety violationslntoxication -- _AverageWeeklyWage _St00ada - �''••r-L •`� ` _r_ y _. fringe benefits •4 *_ •. ' ' •_failure to admit/deny(date respondent knew - _multiple employers -.-.._ •_c•,`: :' -_ _�, - v, •t_._- y Of Injury ) •(date admission/denial �� _Overtime • F-rtlletl. - _ImpfOPef Computation 1.11---? • ti;•••,..1c- Overpayment /Medical Benefits -_- - - • -—Other ------_ - •••JIreasonable and necessary • - • - _ _authorization -.., ,:� _ _related to injury _ Checkif interested in medtatlon -. - _. . - _change of physician - - , . of one or more issues -Party checking this Issue must submit a Request for Offset of Liability to Subsequent Injury Fund,pursuant t0 Part XII, Rules of Procedure. ..: Provide a brief explanation of the issues t0 be heard.(attach additional page if necessary). Galmant eonbinues-fo be disabled -- i5 -fa{al permanel-Hy di-sahkd. , , — ._ . . .. _ _ -NOTICE SET --- - (r0 be used for Denver s only.If not completed, division will set this matter for hearing without - ± -- - Contacting the Parties.) - ,; A setting date shall be On a Tuesday, ay or Thursday,at least 40 days after the.APPLICATION FOR --- HEARING has been mailed. ' • -" - • ..r-"1-'.'" i 'iii., lc •o • j e Claimant ( ), Employer( -).I rer( _ '''ivill'a C -;�,' ppear before the Dl4lsiori of LaUOr Docket clerk -1ti / on the 'day of ••19�at (AM) (PM)to set this matter for-hearing. ",The adverse party may a ar or,if not present,will be called at or a he time specified. -• „ • , r,y(� (�I5�ao Complete Reverse Side J _ eV'.et Rev.8•B9 - �� !�C- : CFI r t;4r :•• t_✓ � T"�cs, r. • WITNESSES List names,addresses,and expertise, if any of all witnesses to be presented,both lay and medical. Include claimant and any other party.Or representative of a party,who will be testifying. (1)_Abdo Davidcnn ,Iirove., Apt. 320,Tucsor, At 85704 (2) Dr. Neal H . kik& • #0 .4±' eett Greeley e0 €01231 (3) Any tairtbse6 reopondcntt may raft. (4) • (g) (6) NOTE:At the hearing,the applicant will provide testimony, by subpoena if necessary,of all witnesses listed above. r - Estimate L the time you'need to the nearest 30 minutes for your portion of the hearing. t'T4 Lay ir• Medical th hr CERTIFICATION • •stand that the party issuing the-.NOTJCE TO SET is responsible for contacting an other parties and clearing avaif�bte ates w• m and sending a written notice of the hearing,On a form prescribed by the director,to all • other part :S•b re• !mail within 20 days after the setting date. .*:•„ • - that:Aave contacted the opposing party(les)and attempted to resolve the matter(s)in dispute. O suC• eff•rt wa . •, cessful. 1115 11411 Avenue S• r ' - -- Street Address !' itic%Tu.• t=05 greeky • eo 80631 . . - Apwroente/Attdmeye ame(Panted) Reg.No. City,Stele and Z Coda e aimant • 356. 5515 August 23, 1400 Party AttOrneY re ReDrefeating _ Pare Numger Oats 1 hereby certify that a copy of this document has been mailed to the following parties at the address shown. • &lady5 Davidson Nvision a labor 444 West Orange trove- 112,0 -Lincoln Ski Kt' .door App 52,0 Denver- CO 80203 - Tc5on AXE 85704 Weld &aunay , Colorado . . Weld Cour��, Colorado Gators Sava Inturanee &N ce. 415 1041' Street 4155 East Jewell Avenue Greeley Co 80(231 • benuer. Co 802.22.• A tie 25,1440 t • to nature - NTRY OF APP ANCE - • (To be completed only when entry of appea nce has not been separately filed) The undersigned attorney. hereby antra an appearance in the abovecaptione att as counsel for . Sign re Reg.NO. STATE OF COLORADO BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND EMPLQ;(10:1 Sy••-j DIVISON OF LABOR CORRECTED APPLICATION FOR HEARING AND NOTICE TO SET_ gel glad Davidson w.c.1n^ 3elgel 542 Claimant. nn 7-M - v5. �JrEd tuntq eolOrtldo TO THc 60: :a Carrier m Employer, and otif intuit 1 �c du • u s. Insurer. ss # � - 5Z- 53 A' une (pp/y,� Respondents • ela The ntt wb tou ,hereby requests a hearing at: Denver, Colo, Spgs. Ft.Collins Pueblo, .GnmenL` mwbyeat!nayren Niters owl Grand Junction, Durango,Glenwood Stns.concerning the following issues: (Check only those issues you wish decided at this hearing) _Compensability _Major Medical Insurance Fund _Course and scope _statutory employer Vocational Rehabilitation Temporary Total Disability _Reopen Claim lira a5 and ton+inuin l _Death Benefits 10enod of time in dispute, • _dependency 1. Temporary Partial Disability _payment t0 Subsequent Injury Fund • 1130$15 and _ton+inuine ,period of..me,n°envier _Disfigurement Benefits Permanent Disability Subsequent Injury Fund Liability* _permanent partial [permanent total —Insurance Coverage _alleged MMI datePenalties _safety violations/intoxication Average Weekly Wage _S100 a day _fringe benefits _failure to admit/deny (date respondent knew _multiple employers of injury t. (date admission/denial _overtime filed ) _improper Computation _Overpayment ✓Medical Benefits _0ther reasonable and necessary _authorization _related to Injury /Check if interested in mediation _change of physician of one or more issues *Party checking this issue must submit a Request for Offset of Liability to Subsequent Injury Fund,pursuant to Part XII, Rules of PrOCedure. Provide a brief explanation of the issues to be heard. (attach additional page if necessary). Claimant bnNnuta -b be dleabiEd. bair,tlant r5 -lolilly PLITanCrUly disabled. NOTICE T ET (To be used for Denver sets only t completed. the ' sion will set this matter for hearing without Contacting the parties.) A setting date shall be on a Tuesday,Wedne or Thursday,at least 40 days a'ter the APPLICATION FOR BEARING has been mailed. The Claimant ( ), Employer( ), Inuur ), 'II appear before the Division of Labor Docket Clerk On the day ot t 9 at (AM) (PM)to set this matter for hearing. The adverse party may appe r, if not present,will be called at or about • e specified. Complete Reverse Side wC80 Rev,8.89, i • WITNESSES 'List names,addresses,and expertise, if any,of all witnesses to be presented,both lay and medical. Include claimant and any other party,or representative of a party,who will be testifying. (1)_Gliki �tivI 63n 444 Uf¢5rOranacGravy Q, Tin, AL X704 (2) r. al N. 4+'+ r (3) Any *fives responden•la may tall _ (4) (5) (6) NOTE: At the hearing,the applicant will provide testimony, by subpoena if necessary,of all witnesses listed above. Estimate the time you.need t0 the nearest 30 minutes for your portion of the hearing. Lay tl.�� Medical tit hr. CERTIFICATION I under tand th - parry issuing the NOTICE TO SET is responsible fir contacting all other parties and clearing available ate it em and sending a written notice Of the hearing,on a form prescribed by the director,to all .rtlh pelTie egular'mail within 20 days after the setting date. here y c rtify ave cintacted the opposing party(ies)and attempted to resolve the matter(s) in dispute, and hort was unsuccessful. =�!r"--.1 fly Ila Avenue, ,gMYre d n00 iGe Anorney Street AWOL.Jnhn+bymnrt 1805 Gratal CO 80631 Apulicam's/Mtome Name tPnnugl Reg.No. City.State anc;i GOge el&thank 556- 5515 8 28 40 Party ntlorney is Representing Phone Minter STO I hereby certify that a copy of this document has been mailed t0 the f011owing parties at the address shown. iadys Davidson Divithn of I+abor 444 W. Orange G1rove 1120 Itineoln 5t., 144' 3loor - Apt. = Denver CO Sae Tuaon AZ 85104 Weld &awl�Colorado .. . Weld Count./ Cfo eallasner Efassvf Insurance. &mac 915 10th- Et 1.0 5615 DTG Parkway Grultj Co 80651 Suite 550 Englewood CO 80111 8�zaj4O ,��blfi Alt oat sc. tare ENTRY OF APPEARANCE (TO be completed only when an entry of appearance has not been separately filed) The undersigned attorney, hereby enters an appearance in the above-caption after as c sel ter �1 th Rag.No . VaT) CCU _TY^COYnSGcnrirAJOHN HOYMAN,,,,.. .c.�.�:Z ZS: 35 •• ''' ATTORNEYS .r•' JOHN NOTMAN 1115 ELEVENTH AVENUE, GREELEY, COLORADO 8O631 TELEPHONE: 3O3-356-5515 DENVER: 3O3-623-5O1O j0 1i-.. �" '"� KATHERINE E. ALLEN August 28, 1990 Division of Labor and Employment Workmen's Compensation 1120 Lincoln St. , 14th F1. ';_ Denver, Colorado 80203 RE: Gladys Davidson, Claimant vs. Weld County, Employer and self-Insured, Carrier W.C. No. 3-799-542 Carrier No. 1466 DOA: 07/29/85 Please enter our appearance on behalf of the above captioned case, and furnish us with copies of notices and other pertinent communications in this case. By carbon copy hereof, we request the carrier furnish copies of all reports in their file, including the employer's first report and any employee's reports together with all medical reports which they have. Claimant rejects any and all Admissions heretofore filed and any hereafter filed in this case. Thank you very much. JOHN HOYMAN, P.C. John Hoyman JH/tls cc: Weld County, Colorado 915 loth Street Greeley, CO 80631 ca '. • r, Aa • .w / STATE OF COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT DIVISION OF LABOR WOREMEN'S COMPENSATION SECTION • W.C. #3-799-542 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE IN THE MATTER or THE CLAIM OF: GLADYS DAVIDSON, Claimant, vs. - WELD COUNTY. Employer, and SELF-INSURED, Insurer. COMES NOW John Hoyman, P.C. and enters the appearance of the following named counsel representing Claimant: John Hoyman[,, Attorney at Law (Reg. No. 1805) DATEU,F(5 4 3I � !1 P O JOHN HOYMAN, P.C. J• .ymaJ , �— tto • ey for Claim.' t 1115 leventh Avenue Gre - ey, Colorado 80631 ephone: (303) 356-5515 Registration No. : 1805 s `' . • . Y I CERTIFICATE OF MAILING I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 31� day of ( , 1990, I placed a true copy of the foregoing ENTRY F CiA ARANCE in the United States Mail, first class postage prepaid, addressed to: Division of Labor . 1120 Lincoln St. , 14th F1. Denver, CO 80203 Weld County, Colorado 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Linnuitusc- earW • � :,-\ AGENDA WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Tuesday, September 4, 1990 12:00 noon - Weld County Planning Commission Luncheon - Pepe O'Tooles, 2726 West 11th Street Road, Greeley, Colorado 1:30 p.m. - Public Meeting of the Weld County Planning Commission, County Commissioners' First Floor Hearing Room (#101) , Weld County Centennial Center, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado. ROLL CALL Jerry Kiefer, Chairman Bud Clemons, Vice-Chairman LeAnn Reid Jean Hoffman Rick Iverson Richard Kimmel Ann Garrison Don Feldhaus Judy Yamaguchi 1. CASE NUMBER: USR-923 APPLICANT: Mount Calvary Lutheran Church REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for an expansion of an existing church in the R-2 (Duplex Residential) zone district LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NE} of Section 7, TIN, R66W o£ the 6th P.M.; Lots 2-5 and 8-11 Peaceful Acres Subdivision, Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: 657 Park Avenue, Fort Lupton; approximately 150 feet south of the City of Fort Lupton, west of Denver Avenue 2. CASE NUMBER: Z-457 APPLICANT: Donald W. and Adele A. Baldridge REQUEST: Change of Zone from PUD (Planned Unit Development) for I-1 (Industrial) and C-2 (Commercial) uses to PUD (Planned Unit Development) for I-1 (Industrial) and C-3 (Commercial) uses LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NEI NEi of Section 8, T2N, R68W.of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: South o£ State Highway 119, approximately .5 miles east of Weld County Road 3-1/2 3. CASE NUMBER: USR-924 APPLICANT: Philip Artese REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a home business in the A (Agricultural) zone district LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NEI of Section 6, TIN, R65W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Approximately 3 miles west of the Town of Hudson; north and adjacent to State Highway 52, and approximately .5 miles east of Weld County Road 37 A �5\go . ... n ^ .l .. DISTRICT COURT, COUNTYp,`OF RELD, STATE OF COLORADO liJECD t Case No. 90 C Al;,, V3629 Cp wilssk r 1^ q.^ r SUMMONS TO£ E60,,.',� 3�J. 28 8, CHARLES T. KOZEL, CL TO k Rif Plaintiff, v. WELD COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS; NORTH COLORADO MEDICAL CENTER, INC. ; and NORMEDCO CARE, INC. , A wholly owned subsidiary of North Colorado Medical Center, Inc. , Defendants. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO TO THE ABOVE NAMED DEFENDANT: You are hereby summoned and required to file with the clerk of this court an answer or other response to the attached amended complaint. If service of the summons and amended complaint was made upon you within the State of Colorado, you are required to file your answer or other response within 20 days after such service upon you. If service of the summons and amended complaint was made upon you outside of the State of Colorado, you are required to file your answer or other response within 30 days after such service upon you. If you fail to file your answer or other response to the amended complaint in writing within the applicable time period, judgment by default may be entered against you by the court for the relief demanded in the amended complaint without further notice. DATED this 28th day of August, 1990. • FZ"HER, BROWN, HUDDLESSOO�N & GUNN, P.C. By: �^ . e. -mac' Steven B. Ray, No. eS5 P.O. Drawer J Fort Collins, Colorado 80522 , Telephone: (303) 482-1056 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF This summons is issued pursuant to Rule 4, C.R.C.P., as amended. A copy of the amended complaint must be served with this summons. This form should not be used where service by publication is desired. TO THE CLERK: If the summons is issued by the clerk of the court, the signature block for the clerk, deputy and the seal of the court should be provided by stamp, or typewriter, in the space to the p left of the attorney's name. af`"�' V q\4110 • DISTRICT COURT, COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO Case No. : 90 CV 629 AMENDED COMPLAINT CHARLES T. KOZEL, Plaintiff, v. WELD COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS; NORTH COLORADO MEDICAL CENTER, INC. ; and NORMEDCO CARE, INC. , A wholly owned subsidiary of North Colorado Medical Center, Inc. , Defendants. Charles T. Kozel ("Plaintiff") , by and through his attorneys, Fischer, Brown, Huddleson & Gunn, P.C. and Frey, Lech & Michaels, P.C. , amends his Complaint against Defendant Weld County Board of County Commissioners; Defendant North Colorado Medical Center, Inc. ; and Defendant NORMEDCO CARE, Inc. , a wholly owned subsidiary of North Colorado Medical Center, Inc. ("Defendants") as follows: SIXTH CLAII_FOR RELIEF (Breach of Express and Implied Covenants of Good Faith and Fair Dealing) 52. Plaintiff realleges and incorporates by reference the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 51 of his Complaint filed on August 8, 1990. 53. During Plaintiff's formal and informal interviews and hiring negotiations conducted with and by the agents, representa- tives, and employees of Defendants, express promises and repre- sentations were made to Plaintiff as outlined in the General Allegations of Plaintiff's Complaint. 54. By virtue of these express promises and representations, express and implied covenants were made with Plaintiff, upon which covenants Plaintiff based his decision to move himself and his • family from California to Colorado and accept the position of Public Health Administrator for the weld County Health Department. 55. At the time of Plaintiff's termination on February 28, 1989, Plaintiff was permitted access to no employee rights, including the right to a hearing, grievance procedure, or other recourse upon his termination; he was given no opportunity for full-time employment in another position with any of the Defen- dants, even though he had demonstrated excellent work performance; and he was refused full salary and benefits for six months, his current title, and an excellent current reference, contrary to these and other express promises and express and implied covenants which had been made by Defendants during Plaintiff's interview process and subsequent hiring negotiations with them. 56. The Defendants, their agents, representatives, and employees, also owed a duty to Plaintiff to act fairly and in good faith by virtue of Plaintiff's special relationship with these Defendants as an applicant for a position with them in the State of Colorado, and owed a duty to abide by the express and implied covenants made with Plaintiff during his interview process and hiring negotiations with them. 57. The Defendants, their agents, representatives, and employees, by failing to abide by their representations and promises expressly made to the Plaintiff during his interview process and hiring negotiations with them, violated their express and implied covenants with Plaintiff and violated their implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing with the Plaintiff. 58. As a direct and proximate result of those Defendants' and their agents, representatives, and employees ' violation of their express and implied covenants with Plaintiff and violation of their implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing with the Plain- tiff, Plaintiff has incurred those injuries, damages, and losses previously set forth in Plaintiff's Complaint filed on August 8, 1990. • SEVENTH CLAIM FOR_RELIEF (Respondeat Superior) 59. Plaintiff realleges and incorporates by reference the allegations contained in paragraphs 52 through 58 of his Amended Complaint. 60. At all times material hereto, the agents, representa- tives, and employees of Defendants who were involved in Plaintiff's interviewing, hiring, employment, and termination were within the scope of their employment with the respective Defendants. 2 p 61. Under the doctrine of respondeat superior, Defendants are responsible fur the acts of their respective agents, representa- tives, and employees, and are responsible for any and all injuries, losses, and damages suffered by the Plaintiff to the same extent as each of their respective agents, representatives, and employees_ WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for judgment in favor of him and against the Defendants, jointly and severally, for damages in an amount to be proven at trial; for the costs and expenses of this action; for interest at the legal rate from the date of Plaintiff's termination; for his expert witness fees and attorneys' fees; and for such other and further relief as the Court deems equitable and just. DATED this 27th day of August, 1990. FTSCHER, BROWN, HUDDL£5ON & GUNN, P.C. i By: ---____- %- -s . Steven B. Ray, ,#5435 P. O. Drawer J Fort Collins, Colorado 80522 Telephone: (303) 482-1056 Attorneys for Plaintiff Plaintiff's Address: 11100 Roxboro, Apt. #108 Oklahoma City, OK 73162 h\wpt\.er\ \eapl,t,nee 3 STATE OF COLORADO BOARD OF LAND COMMISSIONERS Department of Natural Resources 620 Centennial Building Op•CO� 7373 Sherman St., Denver,Colorado 80203 Ak' �9 (303) 866-3454 ;ter O. S \ r, 'J' _ t August 24, 1990 AUG 2 71990 *" •/879 » ti:J P Commissioner V`- „+, - LUCY BLACK CREIGHTON • ROBERT R.MAILANDER County Clerk and Commissioners ti JOHN S.WILKES in Weld County P O Box 758. Greeley, CO 80632 Gentlemen: It is the policy of the State Board of Land Commissioners to notify the counties of pending Board actions within your county. As there are certain tracts on the enclosed notice o£ oil & Gas- Lease Auction which are in your county, the Board requests that you post this notice on your bulletin board until after that auction. The notice shows the date, time, and place it will be held. Thank you. Thank you. Sincerely, pa fryzotrite-7,..?Josephine Calkins Minerals Section LRL/jc Enc. ANTHONY\ O SABATI NI �\ ire IADWIG RUTH J. KARY "` Administrator Minerals Director Deputy Register STATE OF COLORADO BOARD OF LAND COMMISSIONERS Department of Natural Resources 620 Centennial Building C'COCO 1313 Sherman St., Denver,Colorado 80203 �tt:OA (303) 866-3454 ti� Yc y h O W f + •,B,e•w May 1, 1990 COmmissiOners WCY!LACK CRE IGHTON ROBERT R.MAl1ANDER IOHN S.WILKE5111 ; MPORTA_IT NQIICE OIL AND GAS LEASE AUCTION SCHEDULE FOR SECOND HALF OF 1990 _ Auction pate Deadline for Submitting Tract Recuests September 20, 1990 (Thursday) July 20, 1990 December 20, 1990 (Thursday) October 19, 1990 Document 2524D ANTHONY SABATINI Lit IADWIC RUTH J. RARY Administrator Minerals Director Deputy Register 620 Centennial Building Phone (303) 866-3454 1313 Sherman Street STATE BOARD OF LAND COMMISSIONERS OF THE STATE OF COLORADO Oil and Qas Lease Auction Thursday, September 20, 1990 10:00 AM Legislative Services Building N O T F 200 E. 14th Ave. , Room B (SE Corner of 14th 6 Sherman) Denver, Colorado 80203 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, That the State Board of Land Commissioners, by means of its regular leasing procedure (oral bidding) , intends to grant oil and gas leases on the tracts listed. Leases will be on Colorado Oil 6 Gas Lease Form 193-6 (Rev. 8/89) , as amended. The Board reserves the right to reject any and all bids, and to withdraw any tract at any time. PAYMENT IN FULL FOR ANY AND ALL TRACTS IS DUE AND PAYABLE AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE SALE. SIGHT DRAFTS WILL. NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR ANY PAYMENT. TRACT PORTION _NO. , ACRES SUBDIVISION 55„EQJWP.RGE. COUNTY PATENTED 1 120.00 SW/4NW/4; S/2SW/4 14-1S-59W Adams All 2 200.00 NW/4NE/4; S/2NE/4; 15-1S-59W Adams All E/2SE/4 3 655.88 All 16-1S-59W Adams All 4 487.58 Lots 1-4; W/2 16-298-41W Baca None 5 479.96 E/2; E/2SW/4, 31-30S-41W Baca All Lots 364 (SW/4) 6 567.28 Lots 1-4; W/2E/2; W/2 16-32S-41W Baca All 7 640.00 All 36-28S-42W Baca All 8 640.00 All 16.29S-42W Baca All 9 640.00 All 36-29S-42W Baca All 10 640.00 All 16-30S-42W Baca All 11 640.00 All 36-30S-42W Baca None Page _1_ of _11_ TRACT PORTION N0. ACRES SUBDIVISION SEC.TWP.R9E, COUNTY ZATFNTED 12 244.88 In Tract 46 Res, of 16-34S-42W Baca All Described as: 0.47 ac. , Lot 6 10-34S-42W 244.41 ac. , Lots 5,10, 15-34S-42W 17-20,22,24 13 530.60 Tract 75 Res, of 16-35S-42W Baca None Described as: 29.37 ac. , Lots 264 9-35S-42W 48.98 ac. , Lots 2,4,6 10-35S-42W 285.53 ac. , Lots 10-15, 15-35S-42W 17-19 166.72 ac. , Lots 5,9,10, 16-35S-42W 13-15 14 316.06 NE/4, E/2NW/4, 18-28S-43W Baca All Lots 162 (N/2) 15 640.00 All 36-29S-43W Baca All 16 640.00 All 16-30S-43W Baca All 17 640.00 All 36-30S-43W Baca All 18 624.39 Tract 46 Res. of 36-31S-43W Baca All 19 640.00 All 16-28S-44W Baca All 20 640.00 All 36-28S-44W Baca All 21 640.00 All 16-29S-44W Baca All 22 640.00 All 16-28S-45W Baca All 23 640.00 All 36-28S-45W Baca All 24 640.00 All 16-29S-45W Baca All 25 640.00 All 36-29S-45W Baca All 26 640.00 All 16-30S-45W Baca All 27 639.69 Tract 49 Res, o£ 16-32S-45W Baca All Described as: 10.17 ac. , Lots 264 9-32S-45W 20.23 ac. , Lots 2,4,6 10-32S-45W 407.40 ac. , Lots 2-7, 15-32S-45W 10-13,15,17 201.89 ac. , Tots 1,2,5-8, 16-325-45W 11,12 Page -2- of —11_ TRACT PORTION N0. ACRES SUBDIVISION $EC.TVP.RGE. O 1y�fj(' ZUMIL2 28 640.07 Tract 99 Res, of 36-31S-46W Baca All Described as: 14.74 ac. , Lot 9 30-31S-45W 130.86 ac. , Lots 9-12 31-31S-45W 49.98 ac. , Lots 2,4,6,8 25-31S-46W 444.49 ac. , Lots 1-4, 36-31S-46W 7-14,17,18, 20,22 29 640.00 All 16-15S-45W Cheyenne All 30 640.00 All 16-9S-57W Elbert Part 31 480.00 N/2; SE/4 24-9S-57W Elbert All 32 640.00 All 34-9S-57W Elbert Part 33 640.00 All 16-13S-62W E1 Paso None 34 640.00 All 16-2N-80W Grand All 35 320.00 W/2 36-2N-80W Grand None 36 480.00 N/2; N/2S/2 8-3N-SOW Grand None 37 640.00 Tract 37 Res. of 9-3N-80W Grand None Described as: 0.52 ac. , Frac. Pt. 3-3N-80W 22.00 ac. , Frac. Pt. 4-3N-80W 602.66 ac. , Frac. Pt. 9-3N-80W 14.82 ac. , Frac. Pt. 10-3N-80W 38 640.00 Tract 46 Res. of 16-3N-80V Grand Part Described as: 22.15 ac. , Frac. Pt. 9-3N-80W 0.57 ac. , Frac. Pt. 10-3N-80W 14.47 ac. , Frac. Pt. 15-3N-SOW 602.81 ac. , Frac. Pt. 16-3N-80W 39 169.20 In Tract 64 Res. of 36-3N-80W Grand None Described as: 5.00 ac. , Frac. Pt. 25-3N-SOW 164.20 ac. , Frac. Pt. 36-3N-80W (E/2E/2) 40 328.24 E/2SW/4., Tots 364, 19-4N-80W Grand None SE/4 (S/2) 41 480.00 N/2; SE/4SW/4; 29-4N-80W Grand Part NE/4SE/4; S/2SE/4 Page _2_ o£ _L TRACT PORTION _TO. ACRES SUBDIYISIOIL SEC.TW3.RGE. Mai ( PATENTED 42 657.52 E/2, E/2W/2, 30-4N-80W Grand None Lots 1-4 (All) 43 661.50 E/2, E/2W/2, 31-4N-80W Grand Nona Lots 1-4 (All) 44 640.00 All 32-4N-80W Grand Part 45 475.60 SW/4NE/4; E/2W/2, 19-4N-81W Grand None Lots 1-4 (W/2) ; NW/4SE/4; S/26E/4 46 640.00 All 23-4N-81W Grand None 47 640.00 All 26-4N-81W Grand None 48 637.52 E/2, E/2W/2, 30-4N-S1W Grand None Lots 1.4 (All) 49 638.04 E/2, E/2W/2, 31-4N-81W Grand None Lots 1-4 (A11) 50 640.00 All 35-4N-61W Grand None 51 640.00 All 36-4N-81W Grand None 52 80.00 E/2NE/4 29-8N-77W Jackson All 53 119.96 Lot 4, SW/4NW/4 1-8N-78W Jackson None (W/2NW/4) ; NW/4SW/4 54 200.04 Lot 1, SE/4NE/4 2-8N-78W Jackson None (E/2NE/4) ; NE/4SE/4; S/2SE/4 55 240.00 NE/4; E/2NW/4 11-8N-78W Jackson None 56 400.00 NE/4; W/2NW/4; 12-8N-78W Jackson None SE/4NW/4; NE/4SW/4; N/2SE/4 57 640.00 All 16-8N-78W Jackson All 58 480.00 S/2N/2; S/2 23-8N-78W Jackson None 59 640.00 All 24-8N-78W Jackson None 60 40.00 NE/4NE/4 25-8N-78W Jackson None 61 200.00 NE/4; NE/4NW/4 26-8N-78W Jackson None Page _A_ o£ 1 TRACT PORTION N0. ACRES SUBDIVISION SEO.7WP,ROE. COUNTY PATEEIED 62 640.00 All 36-8N-78W Jackson None 63 360.00 N/2N/2; SW/4NW/4; 20-10N-78W Jackson None W/2SW/4; SE/4SW/4; SW/4SE/4 64 560.00 W/2NE/4; NW/4; S/2 29-1ON-78W Jackson None 65 400.00 NE/4; E/2W/2; W/2SE/4 32-1ON-78W Jackson None 66 480.00 N/2; SW/4 11-19S-47W Kiowa Part 67 640.00 All 16-17S-49W Kiowa All 68 160.00 SE/4 33-20S-49W Kiowa None 69 640.00 All 16-17S-50W Kiowa All 70 640.00 All 36-17S-50W Kiowa All 71 640.00 All 16-11S-49W Kit Carson All 72 640.00 All 36.11S-49W Kit Carson None 73 160.00 SW/4 15-34N-12W La Plata All South of Ute Line 74 160.00 S/2S/2 16-8N-68W Larimer All 75 640.00 All 36-8N-68W Larimer None 76 640.00 All 16-9N-68W Larimer All 77 640.00 All 36-9N-68W Latimer Part 78 640.00 All 36-10N-68W Larimer None 79 635.78 Lots 16,2, S/2N/2. 2-11N-68W Larimer None S/2 (All 80 640.00 All 12-11Y-68W Larimer None 81 480.00 N/2; SW/4 24.11N-68W Larimer Part 82 160.00 N/2NW/4; SE/4NW/4; 34-11N-68W Larimer None SE/4SW/4 83 640.00 All 36-11N-69W Larimer All 84 640.00 All 16-12S-52W Lincoln None Page _1_ of _.1.1— i TRACT PORTION N0. agEl SUBDIVISION $EC.TWP.RCE. cony PATENTED 85 241.91 Lots 162, S/2NE/4 5-6N-52W Logan All (NE/4); Lot 3, SE/4NW/4 (E/2NW/4) 86 160.00 SE/4 32-7N-52W Logan All 87 320.00 W/2 16-11N-52W Logan None 88 480.00 N/2; N/2S/2 36-4N-90W Moffat All 89 276.33 Lots 1,2,7,8 (NE/4); 29.9N-90W Moffat None Lots 9610 (N/2SE/4): Lot 15 (SW/4SE/4) 90 324.42 Described as: 304.26 ac. , Lots 1.6; 10-4N-92W Moffat None SE/4SW/4; S/2SE/4 20.16 ac. , Lot 8 34-5N-92W 91 240.00 NE/4: E/2NW/4 23-6N-92W Moffat None 92 80.00 W/2NW/4 24-6N-92W Moffat None 93 80.00 NE/4SW/4: NW/4SE/4 20-12N-101W Moffat None 94 480.00 N/2; SE/4 36-6N-58W Morgan None 95 280.00 N/2NW/4; N/2S/2; 27-1N-59W Morgan None SE/4SE/4 96 480.00 N/2; SW/4 28-1N-59W Morgan None 97 80.00 E/2SE/4 32-1N-59W Morgan None 98 640.00 All 33-1N-59W Morgan None 99 400.00 S/2NW/4; S/2 34-1N-59W Morgan None 100 480.00 N/2; N/2S/2 36-1N-59W Morgan None 101 640.00 All 16-2N-59W Morgan None 102 640.00 All 36-2N-59W Morgan None 103 640.00 All 16-6N-59W Morgan None 104 640.00 All 16-13S-74W Park None • 105 640.00 All 36-13S-74W Park None Page of 11_ TRACT PORTION N0. ACRES SUBDIVISION $EC.TWP.RCE. cOna 7AnNTED 106 249.32 Lots 1-4 (N/2N/2); 6-12S-75W Park All S/2NE/4; SE/4NW/4 107 240.00 S/2NE/4; NW/4 17-12S-75W Park All 108 160.00 NE/4 18-12S-75W Park All 109 320.00 S/2 14-10S-76W Park None 110 240.00 W/2SE/4; SW/4 1-12S-76W Park None 111 317.80 Lots 162, S/2NE/4, 2-12S-76W Park Part SE/4 (E/2) 112 663.36 Lots 1-7, S/2NE/4, 6-12S-76W Park None SE/4NW/4, E/2SW/4, SE/4 (A11) 113 639.74 Lots 1-4, E/2, 7-12S-76W Park None E/2W/2 (All) • 114 80.00 N/2NE/4 11-12S-76W Park None 115 80.00 N/2NW/4 12-12S-76W Park None 116 80.00 E/2NE/4 13-12S-76W Park None 117 640.00 All 16-12S-76W Park None 118 437.99 NE/4; NE/4NW/4; 18-12S-76W Park Part Lot 2, SE/4NW/4 (S/2NW/4) ; E/2SW/4, Lots 364 (SW/4) 119 397.08 NW/4N£/4; S/2NE/4 19-12S-76W Park None E/2NW/4, Lots 162 (NW/4) ; NE/4SW/4; N/2SE/4 120 480.00 N/2; N/2S/2 20-12S-76W Park None 121 480.00 N/2; N/2S/2 21-12S-76W Park None 122 120.00 SW/4NE/4; S/2NW/4 22-12S-76W Park None 123 280.00 N/2SW/4; SE/4SW/4; 22-12S-76W Park None SE/4 124 160.00 SW/4 23-12S-76W Park None 125 480.00 N/2; SE/4 27-12S-76W Park None Page Z of -11- TRACT PORTION -IQ ACRES SUBDIVISION $EC-TWP.RCE. COUNTY PATENTED 126 152.59 E/2SW/4,Lots 364(SW/4) 30-12S-76W Park None 127 309.89 SE/4, E/2SW/4, 31-12S-76W Park None Lots 364 (S/2) 128 640.00 All 32-12S-76W Park Part 129 640.00 All 33-12S-76W Park None 130 640.00 All 34-12S-76W Park None 131 640.00 All 36-12S-76W Park None 132 472.36 Lots 1-5, S/2NE/4, 6-13S-76W Park Part SE/4NW/4 (N/2) ; SE/4 133 625.24 E/2, E/2W/2, 7-13S-76W Park None Lots 1-4 (All) 134 320.00 W/2 15.13S-76W Park None 135 640.00 All 16-13S-76W Park None 136 320.00 E/2 21-13S-76W Park None 137 320.00 W/2 28-13S-76W Park All 138 320.00 W/2 29-13S-76W Park All 139 160.00 SE/4 30-13S-76W Park All 140 160.00 NE/4 31-13S-76W Park All 145.00 ac. in Park Cnty. 15.00 ac. in Chaffee Cnty. 141 160.00 NW/4 32-13S-76W Park All 142 640.00 All 36-13S-76W Park None 143 640.00 All 36-24S-42W Prowers All 144 640.00 All 16-25S-42W Prowers None 145 640.00 All 16-27S-42W Prowers All 146 640.00 All 36-27S-42W Prowers All 147 240.00 SW/4; S/2SE/4 16-23S-43W Prowers All 148 640.00 All 16-24S-43W Prowers None Page _1_ of 1 TRACT PORTION N0. ACRES SUBDIVISION $EC.TWP.RGE, cONIX pip 149 640.00 All 16.26S-43W Prowers None 150 640.00 All 36-255-44W Provers None 151 640.00 All 16-26S-44W Prowers None 152 640.00 All 16-27S-44W Prowers All 153 640.00 All 36-21S-45W Prowers All 154 160.00 NW/4 16.225-45W Prowers None 155 40.00 NW/4NW/4 28-22S-45W Prowers None 156 640.00 All 36-27S-45W Prowers All 157 160.00 SE/4 24-5N-53W Washington None 158 320.00 S/2 16-11N-56W Weld None 159 640.00 All 36-11N-56W Weld None 160 320.00 E/2 36-9N-59W Weld All a 161 640.00 All 16-9N-60W Weld None 162 640.00 All 36-9N-60W Weld None 163 320.00 E/2 12-2N-61W Weld None 164 640.00 All 16-8N-65W Weld None 165 640.00 All 16-9N-65W Weld None 166 160.00 NW/4 36-7N-67W Weld All 167 320.00 W/2 36-8N-67W Weld None 168 640.00 All 36-9N-67W Weld None 169 80.00 E/2SE/4 10-1ON-67W Weld None 170 640.00 All 16-1ON-67W Weld Part 171 305.86 W/2 Lot 1, SW/4NE/4, 6-11N-67W Weld None W/2SE/4 (W/2E/2); Tat 4. E/2SW/4 (SW/4) 172 320.00 E/2 8-11N-67W Weld None 173 640.00 All 10-11N-67W Weld None Page _2_ of _11- TRACT PORTION N0. ACRES SUBDIVISION $EG_TWP.RCE. COUNTY =Inn 174 640.00 All 12-11N-67W Wald None 175 640.00 All 14-11N-67W Weld None 176 640.00 All 16-11N-67W Weld None 177 608.20 E/2, E/2W/2, 18-11N-67W Weld None Lots 162 (All) 178 320.00 N/2NE/4; SE/4NE/4; 22-11N-67W Weld None NW/4; NE/4SE/4 179 216.36 S/2 Lot 1 (SW/4NW/4); 30-11N-67W Weld None Tat 2 (W/2SW/4) ; SE/4SW/4; S/2SE/4 180 640.00 All 36-11N-67W Weld None Subject to ROW 1363-13 (USA Cable Line - 1.97 ac. in N/2S/2) 181 640.00 All 16-2S-44W Yuma All 182 640.00 All 16-2N-4SW Yuma None TOTAL ACRES OFFERED: 85.508.24 Errors sometimes occur in the listing though every effort is made to avoid them. The Board is not liable for any inconvenience or loss caused by errors which may occur. Corporations must be registered and in good standing with the Secretary of State's Division of Corporations to do business in Colorado. NOTE: Receipts for all rental payments after the first year will not be mailed to lessees unless a stamped, self-addressed envelope accompanies the rental payment. ,SALE PROCEDURES All tracts will be offered for sale by oral bidding at public auction. All monies are due immediately after the sale. Page -12- of —11— Rentals and bonus bidding are on a per acre basis. The minimum bid, often called the opener by the auctioneer, is the first year's rental of $1.00 per acre or fraction thereof, plus the statutory fees (shown below). The bidding beyond the minimum, is a bonus bid and the winning bidder will pay the amount bid plus the first year's rental and fees. The bonus is a one time payment only while the rentals are annual and continuous whether or not production is established. The bidding is in multiples of $1.00 but this may be changed at any time by the Board. The lease will, of course, be awarded to the highest bidder. FEE SCHEDULE: 160 acres $12.75 161.320 14.25 321-480 15.75 481-640 17.25 ,$1,50 for each additional 160 acres WARNING There is no assurance that there is any potential for production on any tract offered for leasing by the State Board of Land Commissioners. Document 6745D Page 1L of 1L -��.�TE OF COLORADO BOARD OF LAND COMMISSIONERS ��'` Department of Natural Resources 620 Centennial Building rt :: 2, 7373 Sherman St.,Denver,Colorado 80203 'i'j .- 7 l �p4+C0�9 (303) 866-3454 CLE.it- TOMEB°"`' . w, A.1876 • August 28, 1990 eomm..0.e.s Lucy MACK CREIGHTON ROBERT R.MAItANDER JOHN S.WILKES 111 T0: ALL SURFACE OWNERS AND LESSEES OF STATE LANDS IN THE FOLLOWING: SECTIONS TOWNSHIPS RANGES COUNTIES 16 4N 64W Weld Lockhart Geophysical Company has been granted permission to conduct exploration on certain State lands in the above Townships, some of which you have under lease, er the surface of which you own Lockhart Geophysical Company is bonded with this Board and will be represented by Jerry Nicefield . They will be responsible for any damage or loss to your crops and personal property caused by their activity . Lessees are not entitled to any settlement for damage which may be inflicted on the land itself, because it is owned by the State, and there shall be no payments for nuisance because the minerals lessee has his lease rights and this permit to do what is necessary to develop his leased minerals . Our Appraiser will determine the amount of damage, if any, after the work is completed. Should any problems arise, please contact this office. Your cooperation will be appreciated . Thank you. Sincerely, Josephine Calkins Minerals Section /jc SURFACE LESSEES NOTIFIED: Patented Surface CC: State Field Appraiser, Bud Clemons- County Commissioners, Weld County Permittee, Lockhart Geophysical Company State Archaeologist, Susan Collins ANTHONY SABATINI?.." l.R. tADWIC RUTH ) KARV 5InD A�dm`inist�rator Minerals Director Deputy Register CG, rJ.7 J 2L‘ ,. 7 3" nn 1}• � � STATE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON *` ; . Ann Topliff 3645 W. 112th Avenue 466-8811 x386 President Westminster, CO 80030 V/TDD August 15, 1990 TO: County Commissioners in Colorado It has tome to the attention of the State Advisory Committee on Deafness that legally required communication accessibility may not be provided by some County Departments of Social Services. Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and Section 122 (a) of the State and Local Fiscal Assistance Act of 1972 require that all city, state, and local agencies ensure effective communication with hearing-impaired people. Auxiliary aids must be provided so that deaf and hard of hearing people have equal opportunity to benefit from the same services and programs offered to the general public. These aids include sign language interpreters, assistive listening systems, and Telecommunication Devices for the Deaf (TDD) . It is important that agency staff members understand how to use a TDD, how to effectively communicate with deaf and hard of hearing people, and how to ensure that this population's needs are being met by equal opportunity and accessibility. With the increased national incidence of hearing loss in people of all ages, it is vital that County Department of Social Services agencies have an understanding of deafness and hearing impairment. If you have any questions, the State Coordinator on Deafness, Cheryl Blehm-Poskus is available to provide assistance. She can be reached in Denver at 866-3258, Voice or TDD. Her office address is listed below. It is very important that the federal laws be followed and accessibility of services be available to all of our citizens. Thank you for your cooperation. Respectfully yours, 441/ Ann Topliff, President State Advisory Committee on Deafness attachment k cc: Cheryl Blehm-Poskus, State Coordinator on Deafness ' 1575 Sherman St, 4th Fl, Denver, CO 80203 (303)866-3258 V/TDD l• vv.• MODEL AUXILIARY AID POLICY FOR CITY, STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES Pursuant to Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and Section 122 (a) of the State and Local Fiscal Assis- tance Act of 1972, all city,state, and local government agen- cies are required to ensure effective communication with hearing-impaired people. In order to provide equal bene- fits and services, local government agencies must ensure that auxiliary aids are provided for those hearing-impaired people who need such aids in order to participate in government programs and benefit equally from their services. Auxiliary aids include qualified sign language interpreters and tele- communication devices for the deaf (TTYs) . The purpose of these auxiliary aids is to equalize the hearing-impaired person's : opportunity to benefit from the same services and programs offered to the general public. Without necessary auxiliary aids, a hearing-impaired person is often denied this oppor- tunity because of the communication barriers inherent in • deafness. A. The Hearing-Impaired Person Should Determine His or Her Auxiliary Aids Each hearing-impaired person 's auxiliary aid needs will vary, depending on the individual's background, degree of hearing impairment, prior communication training, and the • communication setting. Some hearing-impaired people may 'x An interpreter-may.also, be-needed to explain written forms or documents to the hearing-impaired person, and should be made available for such situations. Interpreters should also be provided at public meetings, classes, and other city-sponsored events. - C. Sign Language Interpreters Must Be Qualified A qualified interpreter must be able to send and receive signs accurately and simultaneous to the communication being interpreted, so as to provide effective communication for the individual hearing-impaired person. The local chapter of the Registry o£ Interpreters for the Deaf (RID) has lists o£ trained and certified interpreters. The government agency should also contact local interpreter referral services , the State School for the Deaf, local vocational rehabilitation offices, and or- ganizations of hearing-impaired people for the names and add- resses of qualified interpreters. The list should be updated periodically and readily available to all agency personnel. If the hearing-impaired person is unable to communicate effec- tively through a particular interpreter, then the agency must provide another interpreter with whom the hearing-impaired person can effectively communicate. D. Agencies Must Be Accessible By TTY Equal opportunity to benefit from and participate in city, state and local government services and programs cannot be guaranteed without providing deaf people telecommunication n r^V ri r nt ' pin ft.,-, 31 •: , , STATE ADVX8ORY CONNITTZE ON D8 10 It. Ann Topliff 3645 W. 112th Avenue 466-8811 X386 President Westminster, CO 80030 V/TAD August 15, 1990 TO: County Commissioners in Colorado It has come to the attention of the State Advisory Committee on Deafness that legally required communication accessibility may not be provided by some County Departments of Social Services_ Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and Section 122(a) of the State and Local Fiscal Assistance Act of 1972 require that all city, state, and local agencies ensure effective communication with hearing-impaired people. Auxiliary aids must be provided so that deaf and hard of hearing people have equal opportunity to benefit from the same services and programs offered to the general public. These aids include sign language interpreters, assistive listening systems, and Telecommunication Devices for the Deaf (TDD) . It is important that agency staff members understand how to use a TDD, how to effectively communicate with deaf and hard of hearing people, and how to ensure that this population's needs are being met by equal opportunity and accessibility. With the increased national incidence of hearing loss in people of all ages, it is vital that County Department of Social Services agencies have an understanding of deafness and hearing impairment. If you have any questions, the State Coordinator on Deafness, Cheryl Blehm-Poskus is available to provide assistance. She can be reached in Denver at 866-3258, Voice or TDD. Her office address is listed below. It is very important that the federal laws be followed and accessibility of services be available to all of our citizens. Thank you for your cooperation. Respectfully yours, 411/1/ Ann Topliff, President State Advisory Committee on Deafness attachment cc: Cheryl Blehm-Poskus, State Coordinator on Deafness 1575 Sherman St, 4th F1, Denver, CO 80203 (303)866-3258 V/TDD �\ 119P \ , .^ , MODEL AUXILIARY AID POLICY FOR CITY, STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES Pursuant to Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and Section 122 (a) of the State and Local Fiscal Assis- tance Act of 1972, all city,state, and local government agen- cies are required to ensure effective communication with hearing-impaired people. In order to provide equal bene- fits and services, local government agencies must ensure that auxiliary aids are provided for those hearing-impaired people who need such aids in order to participate in government programs and benefit equally from their services. Auxiliary aids include qualified sign language interpreters and tele- ` ) communication devices for the deaf (TTYs) . The purpose of these auxiliary aids is to equalize the hearing-impaired person's : opportunity to benefit from the same services and programs offered to the general public. Without necessary auxiliary aids, a hearing-impaired person is often denied this oppor- tunity because of the communication barriers inherent in • deafness. A. The Hearing-Imoaired Person Should Determine His or Her Auxiliary Aids Each hearing-impaired person's auxiliary aid needs will vary, depending on the individual's background, degree of hearing impairment, prior communication training, and the communication setting. Some hearing-impaired people may • P. -2- prefer to rely on lip-readingor written notes in an informal one-to-one situation, but need a qualified interpreter in a group or more formal situation. Most often, deaf people will need sign language interpreters in order to ensure accurate communications. In determining which auxiliary aids are needed to provide effective communication, the deaf person's judgment should govern to the greatest extent possible_ The hearing-impaired person knows best their most effective communication method and aux- iliary aid needs. S. IMPLEMENTATION OF A POLICY TO PROVIDE INTERPRETERS Agency employees should immediately inform hearing-impaired clients and applicants that they may request interpreters to be provided at agency expense in order to communicate effec- tively. Notice of the availability of interpreter services should also be conspicuously posted. In the' case of an ap- pointment with an applicant or client who is known to be hear- ing-impaired and in need of an interpreter, the agency employee should make advance arrangements for the interpreter to be pre- sent during the appointment. If the employee does not know in advance of the need for an interpreter, a new appointment with the hearing-impaired person and an interpreter should be scheduled. Interpreters should be provided at any stage of an agency proceeding, if the hearing-impaired person feels that an interpreter is needed for effective communication. \... -3- An interpreter-may also_ be-needed to explain written-forms or documents to the hearing-impaired person, and should be made available for such situations. Interpreters should also be provided at public meetings, classes, and other city-sponsored events.C. Sign Language Interpreters Must Be Qualified A qualified interpreter must be able to send and receive signs accurately and simultaneous to the communication being interpreted, so as to provide effective communication for the individual hearing-impaired person. The local chapter of the Registry of Interpreters for the Deaf (RID) has lists of trained and certified interpreters. The government agency should also contact local interpreter referral services, the State School for the Deaf, local vocational rehabilitation offices, and or- ganizations of hearing-impaired people for the names and add- resses of qualified interpreters. The list should be updated periodically and readily available to all agency personnel. If the hearing-impaired person is unable to communicate effec- tively through a particular interpreter, then the agency must provide another interpreter with whom the hearing-impaired person can effectively communicate. D. Agencies Must Be Accessible By TTY Equal opportunity to benefit from and participate in city, state and local government services and programs cannot be guaranteed without providing deaf people telecommunication -4- access. Installation of TTYs -iii various agencies would provide deaf people the same opportunity that hearing people now have to contact the agency readily by telephone and enable deaf (and other hearing and speech impaired) people to communicate effectively with such agenices_ The T^Y is a telecommunications device that adapts the telephone to the needs of hearing and speech impaired people. A teletypewriter is connected with a telephone by means of an acoustic coupler which enables the TTY user to communicate with other telephones that are so equipped. The cost of a TTY is relatively modest (S300-$600) and would be even less so when shared by a number of public agencies hooked up to a central TTY number. The fact that a telephone is TTY-equipped should be widely publicized and printed on all letterhead publications and telephone directory listings. All emergency services must be TTY accessible 24 hours a day. M PUBLIC TRUSTEE'S NOTICE OF RIGHTS CURE OR REDEEM .11 TO: WHOM IT MAY CONCERN C1 'n\ ' � II This is to advice you that foreclosure proceedings No. xn were commenced in the office of the Public: I Trustee of the County of e ,State of Colorado,on the_��day !1 of August 19___ .The forcsI sure concerns the Promissory Note and Deed of Dust executed on ' '� the 28th dos of February 1 Y8 I 9 7bX43p4 proasioanLy hInra mndi(tent l nn dntnel i February 8, 1990 by Mike FrizzzzeII I 1 - . I The Decd of Trust was recorded in the records of the office of the Clerk and Recprder of the 1 County of Weld State of Colorado.on the 1st day of MarcZ1 I 19 8y ,in Book 1225 at Page (Film No. _ ,Reception 02172103 r* I The real property which is security for the debt will be sold at Public Trustee's foreclosure sale.Said property is situated in i I ' the _ County of Weld , State of Colorado,and,described as follows: I( ! I See Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. L 11 lI 1, II' 1' it iI i1 1 I I 1 1 i1 'III I I1 II ! 11il IS • , I; II I 11 also known as street and number Vacant Lot I 11WpiS-rgioided i the Secords Of t1 athofdfgicofo�azlli Cl i &iriegoogger f{ rte CounX O622O8298. a e of �o era o, on the y _ � k I2�S a Rec. VOL' MAY HAVE AN INTEREST IN THE REAL:riv,, ANIY BEING FO�tECLOSED. OR HAVE CERTAIN 'I le RIGHTS OR SUFFER CERTAIN LIABILITIES AS A RESULT OF SAID FORECLOSURE. YOU MAY HAVE THE 1 RIGHT TO REDEEM SAID REAL PROPERTY OR YOU MAY HAVE THE RIGHT TO CURE ANY DEFAULT I UNDER THE INSTRUMENT BEING FORECLOSED. A COPY OF THE STATUTES, AS SUCH STATUTES ARE i i 1 I PRESENTLY CONSTITUTED, WHICH MAY AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS, IS ON THE BACK OF THIS NOTICE. i HOWEVER, YOUR RIGHTS MAY BE DETERMINED BY PREVIOUS STATUTES. II 1, i! Check applicable box: 1 I I ©THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN IS AGRICULTURAL REAL ESTATE as defined in 538-39-102, ' C.R.S., and may be subject to the provisions of 538.39-102.5. C.R.S., governing bifurcated sales of I II agricultural real estate. If the owner of said property intends to apply for redemption of an agricultural residence, the owner will be required to obtain a standard improvement survey prepared by a certified land I surveyor. ,I MTHE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN IS NOT AGRICULTURAL REAL ESTATE as defined in 11 538.39-102, C.R.S. 1! Greeley, Colorado .z f 90 ii DATED at tt this day of 19____ . I! 1! !/S II I .�ir li�.�.�f.Q� II mac Trustee Of O Weld Candy 1 II .State of Colorado 'I I 1 Sale Date; _OrtairJO /7, / 9?O BY: 1I Deputy Public Trustee II '' ANNE D. NYE 11 ii PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF WELD COUNTY II For use only in connection with Deeds of Trust data;after July I.st,s. 1020 9th Street No. 202 '' This form is to be mailed to those tenons and in avoidance with those statutes set forth on the reverse of this f g ;1 I aln coumies where Book,ant!Page numbers have been abolished. 1�rOlley, COIOrpdO $0631 1I /� Gil _ _`_ _ _ (303) 352-4365 II ?:1) ./� Rev.2-89. /PUBLIC TRUSTEC5 NOTICF.Of RIGHTS TO CURE OR RF.DRRM lr/ya / `k0 4 ,/ r-fir/,. Redford Publishini„ 10 Wave St..Denver,CO II0202—000 292-2500-249 -9-1 ✓ i.' a • Exhibit A A tract of land being a part of Tract "E", Schneider Industrial Park, a subdivision of part of the S 1/2 of the NW 1/4 of Section 21, Township 5 North, Range 65 West of the 6th P.M. , City of Greeley, Weld County, Colorado, and being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of said Tract "E" and considering the North line of said Tract "E" to bear North 89°44 '43" East, with all other bearings contained' herein being relative thereto: Thence North 89°44 '43" East, 200.00 feet along said North line; Thence South 00°15'17" East, 562.05 feet parallel with the west line of said Tract "E" to a point on the South line of said Tract "E"; Thence South 70°31'40" West, 211.80 feet along said South line to the Southwest corner of said Tract "E"; Thence North 00°15'17" West, 631.77 feet to the Point of Beginning. • • fcl\ucbfrizz.lgl y , COLORADO REVISED STATUTES 38-39.102. Redemption withinrpMlicdpeeled—procedure. (I) Except as provided in this section with respect to agricultural red estate or.from July 1.1987,until January 31,1989,with respect to an agricultural residence as provided in section)879.102.5,within seventy-five days after the date&the sale orient estate by virtue dany foreclosure di mortgage,trust dad.or other lien or by virtue of an execution and levy,the owner of the premises or any person who migM be liable upon•deficiency may redeem the premises sold by paying to the public trustee.sheriff,or other pmper officer the sum for which the property was sold,with enemy fmm die date d Ink tithe delimit rate if%peeihed in the original instrument Of,if nee so specified,attire regular me specified in the original instrument,together with any taxes paid or other proper charges as now provided by law,and a cenifiate of redemption shall be executed by the proper officer and recorded,and the public trustee, sheriff,or Other proper officer shall forthwith pay said money to the holder ofthe Cenificatcofpurchase.If the owner&the premises fails to redeem under this section.any person who might be liable upon a deficiency who redeems under this section shall be issued a certifies**.redemption Only after the eseiMien of the proper redemption period. (2)(6) In the case of any mortgage or deed of trust upon Mr or more parcels of real estate,all of which were agricultural teal estate both upon the date of recording of such mortgage or deed of trust and on the date of the foreclosure sale,the period within whkh the owner of the premises orany person who might be liable upon a deficiency may redeem the premises sold is six months, ChM) From April I8,1986,until January 31,1990,the provisions of this subsection(2)shall apply to the redo nenOn ofagricultural bernestead red e1101f, (3)(a) The term"agricultural red Mate-means,for the purpose oflhda section,any panel offal estate,none&which,on the date*.recording of the mortgage or deed of trust or at the time of the foreclosure sale under such mortgage or eked oftrust,is either platted as a subdhisioe or is both loaded within an incorporated town,city,or city and county and is not valued and'seemed as agricultural land pursuant to sections 39.1.102 0.6)(a)and 39.1-103(5), C.R.S.,by the atseNSOf of the county in which the land is located.If i1 is not evident from the legal description contained in the mortgage ordeed of nest that the real estate described therein i.or is not agricultural real estate,the public trustee.sheriff,or other proper officer empowered to sell real estate at a foreclosure sale shall accept asevidence that the panel is not t agricuhulal red estate either acMified copy*.the subdivision plat containing all ora pan*.the parcel of real estate or both a certificate of the clerk of the city,town,or city and county certifying that all Or•part of the patrol is located within the incorporated limits of the city.town.or city and county on the dale of mending of the mortgage or deed attest or at the time ethic foreclosure sale and a certificate from the assessor of the county in which the property is located certifying that ell er a part of the pared is not veined and ssressed as agricultural land. Such plat or certificates shall be obtained and furnished and the certificates recorded-all of which shall be paid for by she person seeking the determination that the properly is not agricultural real estate,'fat the time ofrecording of the mortgage or deed of trust.oral the lime tithe foreclosure sale, the property Kim whole Or in part.either platted I%a suhdrtision Of is both located withinthe iueolporrted limits of■IOwn,city,or city and county and is not valued and assessed at agricultural land,it shall be deemed for all purposes under this section,and against all persons,that such parcel is notagricuhum:real estate. (8,11 The term"agricultural real estate"as defined for purposes of this senior'in paragraph la)of this subsection(3)shall also apply to this article and articles 37 and 38 of this title. (a) In the case of a foreclosure sale by n public trustee,the public trustee,at least twenty-One days prior to the date on which the sale is originally scheduled by the public trustee,shall mail a notice to the grower*.the deed of trust being foreclosed,to any subsequent owner d record,and to any other person having the right to redeem the prcmises under%libretti°,(1)of this section,informing such persons dthed redemptive rights,if any,under this section and section 38.39-102.1 (Si The public trustee shall mail such notke to the persons described in subsection(q of this section only if their interest in the real estate being foreclosed was established by an instrument recorded with the county clerk and recorder of the county in which said red mate is located subsequem to that recording of the deed of trust bring foreclosed and prior to the recording ofthe notice*.election and demand for seek punwm to section 38.37.113(I).Said Nuke shall be mailed to such persons at the address given in the moiled instrument evdencingthen interests.PostageCOM%under Ibis section stall be pail of the foreclosure costs. (6) The sheriff or other proper officer empowered to sell read mate at a foreclosure sale or at an execution sale,but not including foreclosure sales by the public trustee,at least twenty-one days prior to the date on whichthe sale isorigioally scheduled,shall mail anotketothe ownerof the premises at the Meet . address or comparable identifying numbers of the real estate being sold,if such address or numbers are displayed ou the plepeny or any building thereon, informing the owner thereof of his rights,if any.under this section and stelan.3,4.39.102.5.frlhere is no street address orcomparable identifying numbers to which said notice can be mailed,the sheriff or other proper officer shall mail said notice tothe lam known address*.the owner according to the recordsM Ilse party requesting the foreclosure or execution sale. (7) If the last day of the seventy-five day redemption period,the eix•month redemption period provided for in this section or section 38.39.102.5.orthe lienor redemption periods provided for in section 38-39-103(l)is a Saturday.Sunday,or legal holidayp aday thecasMy rwnlaase is closeddurto increment weather.the Perky('is extended to include the next business day. 38.39.102.5,Redemption of agrkultaral residence. (Ili) This section is repealed.efRelive January 3),PM°, ,18.,19.118. When default is nonpayment. Mtn Whenever the default or violationiide trrmsofdenote and deed of trust ormortgagebeing foreclosed is nonpayment*.any sums due thereunder. the"nen of the properly being foreclosed or panics liable thereon shall beentitled tocure raid defaults if,el least seven days prior tothedate the foreclosure sale is held,+rich ownen or panics give written notice,attaching recorded instruments evidencing their right to cure.to the public trustee,sheriff-orother officer conducting the sate of their intention to cure said default and violation and if.on orbefore 12 noon*.the date before the dry upon which said sak is set, the owners or parties pay to the officer conducting the sale all delinquent principal and imeesl Minton which are due at d the date of such payment exclusive of this!portion of the principal which would not have been due in the ahrence d acceleration.plus all costs,expenses,ate charges.Wortley furs, and other fees incurred by the holder of such note,decd of trust,or mortgage a&the date of payment in connection with such proceedings foecollection and foreclosure. (b)ll) within ten days after the recording of the notice d election and demand for sale by the public trustee pursuant to section 38.37.113.said public trustee or any other proper officer empowered to sell real estate at a foreclosure sale shall mail a notice to the grantor of the deed of trust and to the owners of the property being foreclosed at the addrers given in the monied instrument evidencing the interest*.said potties-informing such panics dtheir rights.if any,under this section,if such instrument evidencing the interest of the owners of the property being foreclosed was mooMed with the county clerk and recorder of the county in which said rat estate is located subsequem to the recording of the deed of trust being foreclered and prior to the recording or the notice of election and demand for sale pursuant to section 38.37.113(q. .00 In the tare of foreclosure of agricultural real tune.(he public trustee or any other proper officer empowered to sell real estate at a foreclosure shall also mail a notice to any other person having the right to redeem the premises under sections 38-39-102 and 38.39.102.5. OM In the case of agricultural real estate,the notice required under this paragraph(b)shall include&clearardoonapkuas statement that the property is agricultural real estate,that the property may be subject to the provisions of section 38-39.102,5 governing bifurcated sales of agricultural real estate,and that,if the owner intends to apply for redemption of an agricultural residence,thc owner will be required to obtain a standard improvement survey preperedby a certified lam!curveype (2) Upon receipt by the officer conducting the rale(*said notice ofinlemion m cure thedeault and violation,such officer shall obtain in writing from the holder of the noir,decd a crust,or mortgage a rtatement of all stuns of principal,intemst,ants.expenses,late charges,attorney fees,and such other fees as are necessary to cure said default and violation. Upon payment of all withdrawal fm and cosU plus an additional fee of Thirty-five dollars to the*.firer conducting said sale on or before 12 noon as provided in this victims,all proceedings for foreclosure shall terminate.The officer conducting the sale,upon receipt of a withdrawal pursuant to section 38-37.1(3(51,shall deliver said sum to the halderdthe note,deed Cot%TOM.Of mortgageor to the agent or attorney for such holder, (t) Nothing in this section shall constitute a waiver of any right accruing after a subsequent violation of any covenant of said note.deed of trust.or mortgage. 38.39.106, (.ester and installment land contract vendor considered as•lkMr—Installment and central wade,considered as me owner. (I) for the purposes of this article,a lessee&the eremites or portion thereof shall be considered as tienorand shall be subject to all requirements in this enicle with respect to tienon:but.ifs nubnequeOf Itenor redeems from the redemption of such lessee,such subsequent Iknur in acquiringsaid properly takes the tone%object to the kese of said lessee. (2) for the purposes°Ir n article.an installment land menet vendor of the premises or portion thereof shall be considered as•tenor for the unpaid portion of the purchase price,interert,and other amraMs provided under the iMldlment andcontract and shall be subject to all requirements in this ankle with respect to lienon:but such installment land contract vendor shall not be considered as an owner as to any portion of the premises affected by the 'rota!Mien,land cnm.ad. (3) For the purposes of this article.an Installment land contract vendee*.the premises or portion thereof shall be considered as anuwneracept as to any portion of such premises that such vendee may thereafter have transferred.as evidenced by a recorded instmmem,and such sender shell be subject to all requirements in this article with respect to owners. 38-31-it3. (8) The public truster shall comply with the notice requirements in sections 38.39.102(d)and 38.39.118(D,when applicable,by mailing a single notice to the grantor of the deed oftrust being foreclosed and to the owners of the property being foreclosed. 38.37.138. Form of payments to public trustee. All moneys payable to a public trustee at any foreclosure sale under the provisions of this article or upon redemption or cure under the pwisionsd ankle 39 of this tide shall be in the form of cash or in the form of.certified check or cashier's check mode payable to such public truster issued by a federally chartered or state-chartered financial InrllfatlOn.IA defined in section 15-15-101(3),C.R.S.,licensed to do business in the Sate of Colorado. •' .. Lim= • ,- J .. '- • COLORADO AEeORA• iCAL BOARD MEETING WELD COUNTY CENTENNIAL. BUILDING FIRST FLOOR ASSEMBLY ROOM Greeley, CO September 6, 1990 10:00 A.M. All Members of the Aviation Community in the Greeley Arca Are Urged to Attend Your Input Is Important! For More Information, please call: COLORADO DIVISION OF AVIATION (303) 397-3039 COLORADO DIVISION OF AVIATION • I • • 1 15110 • STATE of COLORADO DIVISION Of AVIATION •F{" 6848 S. Revere Parkway, Suite 101 rwy w Englewood,CO 80112-6703 FAX 7-304 39FAX 397-3042 397-30x2 - Governor Roy n K Dennis E. Roberts Pima*. MEMORANDUM. To: Legislators, City-County Officials, Airport Tenants, Interested Individuals From: COLORADO DIVISION OF AVIATION Subj: COLORADO AERONAUTICAL BOARD MEETING Date: August 24, 1990 The COLORADO AERONAUTICAL BOARD will meet in open session on September 6th at 10:00 A.M. in the First Floor Assembly Room of the Weld County Centennial Center, 91S Tenth Street, Greeley, CO.. Public attendance and input are encouraged. Agenda topics for this regular monthly meeting will include discussion of the development of a Colorado Department of Transportation, legislative priorities for the 1991 General Assembly, and status of the Colorado Aviation Fuel Sales Tax. Point of Contact: Caroline Scott - Administrative Assistant to the Director at (303) 397-3039. i STATE OF COLORADO DIVISION OF AVIATION a,.r • M-;ey N. • 6848 S. Revere Parkway. Suite 101 .F r .; Englewood.CO 80112.6703 CO OOP 197-1019 re s FAX 397.1042 Roy Romer AGENDA GovernOr Dennis C.Roberts Onecmr COLORADO AERONAUTICAL BOARD THURSDAY,SEPTEMBER 6, 1990 10:00 A.M. WELD COUNTY CENTENNIAL CENTER 91S Tenth Street GREELEY, CO First Floor Aesembly Room I. CALL TO ORDER • 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF AUGUST 3, 1990 Previously Diutributed 3. INTRODUCTION OF BOARD MEMBERS 4. CHAIRMAN- BOARD REPORTS S. AUTOMATED WEATHER REPORTING SYSTEM Briefing by Bob Clark of NOAA on MESONET system. 6. FY-1991 LEGISLATIVE INITIATIVES a. Landing on State Lakes b. Revision to Airport Authority Statutes c. Mechanics Lein d. Jet Fuel Sales Tax e. DOT Legislation 7. REFUNDS TO PRIVATE AIRPORTS-A/G OPINION 8. DIRECTOR'S REPORT a. FY-1991 FAA Grant Application Resolution b. DVX TCA Ad Hoc Committee c. NASA°Planning Task Force 9. PUBLIC INPUT AND COMMENTS 10. OTHER MATTERS BY MEMBERS 11. NEXT AGENDA AND MEETING DATE 12. ADJOURNMENT Laku Landan� �4 World Class Water Ski it �-r� .�• Li Pi. l .. - ,. - Randall Hocking Philip Yastrow 353-3750 229-4544 1.0 z;r:-C.)"• . P P.O. Hoc 332 Windsor.Colorado 80550 August 27, 1990 This letter is being sent to users of gravel in Northeastern Colorado including all County Commissioners, excavation, asphalt and concrete companies. We would hire to give away approximately 400,000 tons of gravel, free of royalties to any interested entity, provided they create two lakes designed specifically for world class tournament water siding on our land which is adjacent to the Cache la Poudre River in Windsor, Colorado. A soil study has been conducted by Empire Labs of Fort Collins in determining that there is an average of 3.5 feet of overburden and 14.3 feet of sand and gravel, with cobbles up to 12 inches in diameter. Assuming the total surface area of the lakes will be about 34 acres with tapered shorelines and about 50% waste material such as sand and inferior gravel, over 400,000 tons of rock and gravel are available. All permits nrcresary for the creation of the lakes and removal of the material have been obtained through Weld County and the State of Colorado. These include: • Mining and processing(crushers, conveyors, screens, etc.) • Well and water discharge permits • Reclamation We will be providing water for the augmentation of evaporative loss caused by exposing ground water to the atmosphere. The only requirements we will impose on the excavation entity are a reclamation bond in an adequate amount for site and road reclamation and a dust abatement program which is approved by the Weld County Health Department. To summarize, we can not continue with the proposed end use of our property until we have at least one lake. Because we have no desire to be in the commercial gravel business, it is important for us to offset the rules of gravel supply and demand by giving our resource away to the appropriate entities which can best implement the design of our lakes. We are therefore looking for somebody that can create our lakes in a time schedule which is considerably less than that of a typical gravel pit. It would be convenient if only one entity were involved, however, we will consider any proposals that accomplish the task of removing the gravel. For example, a group of small users could work together in a joint venture, or, if there is enough demand by smaller users of the material, we could help arrange an excavator that would provide material for a small excavating charge. We arc open to any and all proposals. Please contact us if you arc interested in any way or have any comments concerning this project. Also, there are many more details such as the soil study, our permit information packet and lake design specifics which can be made available to you by calling Phil Yastrow at 303-229-4544. Sincerely, Randy Hocking Phil Yastrow a\ S1 • FOSTER VALUATION COMPANY otc;-V._:;;J .v3 \N- August August 27, 1990 The Board of County Commissioners Weld County P. O. Box 718 Greeley, Colorado 80632 Ladies and Gentlemen: On July 28, 1990, I wrote to obtain your permission to appear on the agenda at one of the upcoming board meetings. Notification of permission has not been received. Please advise me when I can expect to be included on the agenda. Respectfully submitted, _Zie /I-- W. West Foster, MAI, CRE Copy: Julie Coy, Esq. MA% .W. ■ West Foster,MAI,CRE Su Foss Sue Anne Foster,MAI,RrI Real Estate Appraisers&Counselors °161al� Cottonwood Commons Offices• 1750 25th Avenue,Suite 303•Greeley,Colorado 80631 i (303)352-1117 r . . ,,..-.'“ a :,.'. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE cc*. _ Bwnau of tth C.nws 7 ;t 7 Regional Census Center e�� 7 �«�� Lakewood, CO 80222.2307 �., ±C,^. -.J \0 1'' Dear Highest Elected Official: The following is a copy of the letter sent to your designated liaison along with the preliminary housing unit and group quarter population counts for your governmental unit. For a copy of the counts please refer to your liaison. *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** Dear Local Official : As part of the Local Review Program, we are providing Form D-77, the Postcensus Local Review Listing for your governmental unit. This listing provides for your review postcensus counts of housing units and group quarters population at the 1990 census block level. These census counts are based on the results of census enumeration and processing activities, including Postcensus Local Review. The Census Bureau neither encourages nor sanctions their use for official purposes such as budgeting or redistricting. The Postcensus Local Review counts are tabulated based on the boundaries of your governmental unit that were in effect as of January 1, 1990. This is the official date for all boundary information used for the 1990 census. If the Postcensus Local Review maps did not reflect those boundaries legally in effect as of that date, we requested that you submit the documentation outlined in Chapter 3 of the 1990 Decennial Census Local Review Program Technical Guide. To provide sufficient time to verify and update geographic files before we tabulate the 1990 census, we needed to receive this documentation by August 1, 1990. Please review these counts using the boundaries shown on the Postcensus Local Review maps and guidelines provided in the technical guide. The Census Bureau will accept only challenges to housing unit and group quarters population counts at the census block level. The data provided at other geographic levels are for informational purposes only and may not be challenged. Your block estimates must be based on census block numbers and boundaries on the Postcensus Local Review maps. when creating your estimates, use sources similar to those described in Chapter 5 of the technical guide. `1 C\\ \C\C) i t Please submit your response on the enclosed Form D-748, Local Review Response. Form (you may reproduce additional copies, as needed) , along with a signed letter on official stationary from your government's Chief Executive or Highest Elected Official. When identifying census blocks where you suspect the postcensus counts are in errors, you must also provide the source and date of your local estimate. You have 15 working days from the date you received the counts (excluding Saturdays, Sundays and federal holidays) to review them and send your response to the Census office below: Dennis Siglinger Bureau of the Census Genesis Campus v 12005 East 45th Avenue • Denver CO 80239 Adhering to this review time is important in order to provide us the opportunity and time to address any discrepancies and, as necessary, conduct field recanvassing. The Census Bureau encourages you to participate in the 1990 Local Review Program. We will use your response to determine if corrections are required to our 1990 census counts. The Census Bureau will notify you of the outcome of our review. Final and official 1990 census data will be issued to the President on December 31, 1990. we will issue the final population counts for your governmental unit as part of the Thank You America Campaign in early 1991. If you have any questions about conducting your review, please refer to the technical guide or call Dennis Siglinger at (303) 373-8550. ince , William F. Adams Regional Director wan C:n •.+•ry ! rt.; 72 1.1 3; 27 CI.E.,.. 1O Ilia ANNEXATION IMPACT REPORT IRP ANNEXATION August 27, 1990 Prepared by: City of bacon* 512 Cherry Street Dacono, Colorado 80514 feidijikS I. Project Description The legal description for the proposed XKP annexation is included with the Exhibits hereto. The area to be annexed includes approximately 138 acres of land currently believed to be zoned agricultural. In conjunction with the proposed annexations, the zoning is anticipated to change to City of Dacono industrial zoning. II. Municipal Services Municipal services for the IKP Annexation are anticipated to be provided in the following manner. EApctricity Union Rural Electric Association Natural Gas Rocky Mountain Natural Gas Telephone Mountain Bell Water Central Weld County Water District Sewer On site septic systems until such time as service becomes available from a Sanitation District Fire The site is currently believed to be served by the Longmont Fire Protection District, the applicant intends to pursue inclusion in the Dacono Fire Protection District once annexation is complete. police Dacono Police Department Financing the municipal services within the area to be annexed will be addressed in an annexation agreement between the applicant and the City of Dacono. The annexation agreement is currently under negotiation and is not available at this time. XXX. Special Districts The area to be annexed is believed to be included within the following special districts: Central Weld County Water District St. vrain Valley School District RE-1J Tri-area Ambulance District Carbon Valley Recreation District Longmont Fire Protection District 2 IV. School District Impact It is not anticipated that the annexation will affect the local public school district system in any way. V. Exhibits Petition for Annexation Legal Description of Area Proposed to be Annexed Resolution of Substantial Compliance for Annexation Petition Notice of Public Hearing for Annexation Petition 20/56 3 PETITION FOR ANNEXATION ' i I TO: THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DACO , COLORADO with Colorado law, of Dacono and its City Council for We, the undersigned landowners, in accordance , hereby petition the City annexation to the City of Dacono of the unincorporated territory, I the legal descrfrtion of which is attached hereto oias the ibit anY nd this reference, be known as the incorporated herein by and to WBld KP the State of Colorado, Annexation to the City of Dacono. this petition, your petitioners further state to the As part of � City Council that: 1. It is desirable and necessary that the territory described in Exhibit A be annexed to the City of Dacono. 31-12-104 �-105, 2, The requirements. , as amended, existlorshave beenmetin3that: C.R.S. , of the area a. Not less than one-sixth of the perimeter. proposed to be annexed is contiguous with tho City of Dacono or will be contiguous with by Section 31f o Dacono within such time as required 12-104. the area b. A community of .interest exists between the proposed to be annexed and the City of c. The area proposed to be annexed is urban or will be urbanized in the near future. d• The area proposed to be annexed is integrated with or is capable of being integrated with the City of Dacono. e, No land within the boundary of the n timetory identical proposed to be annexed which is held i ownership, whether consisting of one tract or parcel of real estate or two or more contiguous tracts or parcels of arts 1 or parcels has without dthe dewritten separate p consent cf the landowner is we eo separated bya dedicated such tracts or p or other public way. dedicated street, road, f. No land within the boundary of the area proposed to be annexed which is hold in identical ownership, whether consisting of one tract or parcel of ral estate or two or more contiguous tracts or parcels 1 App--co-',40 14:34 ID:CI"' CF DRCON3 CO TEL MO:30:82"-'=56 p_^5^, PO? of real estate, comprises twenty acres or more, and which, together with the buildings and improvements situated thereon, has an assessed value in excess of two hundred thousand dollars ($200,000.00) for ad valorem tax purposes for the year next preceding the annexation, has been included within the area proposed to he annexed without the written consent of the landowner or landowners. n' No annexation proceedings have been commenced for any portion of the territory proposed tO be annexed for the annexation of such territory to another municipality. h. The annexation of the territory proposed to be annexed will not recult in the detachment of area from any school district. i. The annexation of the territory proposed to be annexed will not have the effect of extending the boundary of the City of Dacono more than three miles in any direction from any point of the boundary of the City Of Dacono in any ono year. j . The territory proposed to be annexed is acres in total area. /St k. Prior to completion of the annexation of the area proposed to be annexed, a plan will he in place, pursuant to Section 31-12-105(1) (e) , C.R.S. , which generally describes the proposed location, character, and extent of streets, subways, bridges, waterways, waterfronts, parkways, playgrounds, squares, parks , aviation fields, other public ways, grounds, open spaces, public utilities, and terminals for water, light, sanitation, transportation, and power to be provided by the City of Dacono; and the proposed land uses for the area; such plan to be updated at least once annually. 1. In establishing the boundary of the area proposed to be annexed, if a portion of a platted street or alley is to be annexed, the entire width of the street or alley has been included within the area annexed, and reasonable access will not be denied to any landowners, owners of any easement, or the owners of any franchise adjoining any platted street or alley Which is to be annexed to the City of Dacono but is not bounded on both sides by the City of Dacono. m. If required, an impact report will be prepared and 2 _, I A_PF�-".rc_.03 14:35 I II:r 17` -0-E-645:60 _u 1 LL 1 ILL J r filed pursuant to Section 31-12-108.5, C.R.S. 3. The owners of more than fifty percent of the area proposed to be annexed, exclusive of dedicated streets 1 and alleys, have signed this petition and hereby petition 1 for annexation of such territory. I t 4 . Accompanying this petition are four copies of an ` annexation map containing the following information: n . A written legal description of the boundaries of the I area proposed to be annexed; I b. A map showing the boundary of the area proposed to be annexed, said map prepared by and containing the seal of a registered engineer; c. within the annexation boundary map, a showing of the location of all each of e area or ownership theact area is platted,unplatted lthe ; and, if par f i boundaries and the plat numbers of plots or o o and blocks; 1 d. Next to the boundary of the area proposed to be annexed, a drawing of the contiGboundary of the . boundary of any City of Dacono and the contiguous area proposed to be other municipality abutting the annexed, and a showing of the dimensions of such contiguous boundaries. 5 lands within the area proposed to becoming beannexed effective, will become subject to all ordinances, resolutions, rules, and regulations of the City of Dacono, except for general property taxes of the City Of Dacono, which shall be come effective as of the January 1 next ensuing. G. The zoning classificatioSo._____.ue a for the area proposed to be annexed is 7. If required by the City, an annexation agreement has been or will be executed by the petitioners herein and the City of Dacono relating to this annexation n a thenterd the and petitioners hereby expressly sent conditions set forth in the annexation agreement. WHEREFORE, the petitioners, whose signatures are on the signature sheet on the next page, respectfully requeste the a that nnexation of of Dacono, acting os arts be annexed:Council, pp the area prop annexpet. frm rev 11/6/89 3 , 1 APE-25--'50 la:7F., ID:CITY I TY OF riAcct IU c0 TEL ILO:703-S25-12564.1 ti �+ � --• . • .4.4 Ap, X o •0 a .OGCN .00C10184OVv1 Wp•a0C: n•'CN d4•1bYOWd•.+ C•.1 Qty C -.4 0) •t• N ro .C m io N +i V .-4 +•) 1 t t`• C23 bb o COWa) Fro � o. 1 E01 0 oc w x 0 O.ro 0 ? 'd 0040 / 10+ at10i ON • N ro i4 `•- A 1 d N N •.4 . I to OJ ITN 21 .0 0) OCd W 1) 040 0 rC 0 .•. O 0000) 0000 ?..d� 0 0.0 0 tra .N¢ °u' k 0 Q. N � N Z k d N N 1. y 1O a 101 pO a M r7y E Yoa � 3 co W T.C 7 Q O C N b O CXIP a 01 ON sel 00 0 � N d r, 0 44*el N � ;:t d 2 ro § •r4 EXHIBIT A • • LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS IKP-II ANNEXATIONS Weld County Road No. 13 Annexation No. I LEGAL DESCRIPTION A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE EAST HALF OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., AND THE WEST HALF OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 67 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M. DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NE CORNER SAID SEC. 13, SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE SAID SEC. 13, 30 FEET TO THE WEST R.O.W. LINE OF WELD COUNTY ROAD NO. 13; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID WEST R.O.W. LINE 30 FEET; THENCE EAST 30 FEET TO THE EAST LINE SAID SEC. 13; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE EAST LINE SAID SEC. 13, 29 FEET; THENCE EAST 30. FEET TO THE EAST R.O.W. LINE OF SAID ROAD NO. 13; THENCE NORTH 1 FOOT TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SEC. 18; THENCE WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE SAID SEC. 18, 30 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 1 Weld County Road No. 13 Annexation No. 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION • A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE EAST HALF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M. AND THE WEST HALF OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 67 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M. DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NE CORNER SAID SEC. 13; THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE EAST LINE SAID SEC. 13, 1 FOOT TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING: THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH ALONG THE EAST LINE SAID SEC. 13, 29 FEET; THENCE WEST 30 FEET TO THE WEST R.O.W. LINE OF WELD COUNTY ROAD NO. 13; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID WEST R.O.W. LINE, 1 FOOT; THENCE EAST 30 FEET TO THE EAST L.INF SAID SEC. 13; THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE EAST LINE SAID SEC. 13,177 FEET; THENCE EAST 30 FEET TO THE EAST R.O.W. LINE SAID ROAD 13; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID EAST R.O.W. LINE, 207 FEET; THENCE WEST 30 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 2 Weld County Road No. 13 Annexation No. 3 LEGAL DESCRIPTION A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE EAST HALF OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M. AND THE WEST HALF OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 67 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M.DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NE CORNER SAID SEC. 13; THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE EAST LINE SAID SEC.13, 31 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING: THENCE WEST 30 FEET TO THE WEST R.O.W. LINE OF WELD COUNTY ROAD NO.13; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID WEST R.O.W. LINE, 651 FEET; THENCE EAST 30 FEET TO THE EAST LINE SAID SEC. 13; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE EAST LINE SAID SEC. 13, 473 FEET; THENCE EAST 30 FEET TO THE EAST R.O.W. LINE SAID ROAD NO. 13; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID EAST R.O.W. LINE, 1 FOOT; THENCE WEST 30 FEET TO THE EAST LINE SAID SEC. 13; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE EAST LINE SAID SEC. 13, 177 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 3 • Weld County Road No. 13 Annexation No. 4 LEGAL DESCRIPTION A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE EAST HALF OF SECTION 13. TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M. AND THE WEST HALF OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, . RANGE 67 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M. DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NE CORNER SAID SECTION 13; THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE EAST LINE SAID SEC. 13 209 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING: • THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH ALONG THE EAST LINE SAID SEC.13, 473 FEET; THENCE WEST 30 FEET TO THE WEST R.O.W. LINE OF WELD COUNTY ROAD NO.13; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID WEST R.O.W. LINE, 1 FOOT; THENCE EAST 30 FEET TO THE EAST LINE SAID SEC.13; THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE EAST LINE SAID SEC.13, 1065 FEET; THENCE EAST 30 FEET TO THE EAST R.O.W. LINE OF SAID ROAD NO. 13; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID EAST R.O.W. LINE, 1539 FEET; THENCE WEST 30 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 4 Weld County Road No. 13 Annexation No. 5 LEGAL DESCRIPTION A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE EAST HALF OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M. AND THE WEST HALF OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, I RANGE 67 WEST OF THE 5TH P.M.,DESCRIBEDAS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NE CORNER SAID SEC. 13; THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE EAST LINE SAID SEC.13, 683 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING: THENCE WEST 30 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST R.O.W. LINE OF WELD COUNTY ROAD NO. 13; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID WEST R.O.W. LINE 3315 FEET; THENCE EAST 30 FT TO THE EAST LINE SAID SEC. 13; THENCE NORTH ALO HE EAST LINE SAID SEC. 13, 2249 FEET; THENCE EAST 30 FEET TO THE EAST R.O.W. LINE OF SAID ROAD NO. 13; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID EAST R.O.W. LINE 1 FOOT; THENCE WEST 30 FEET TO THE EAST LINE SAID SEC. 13; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE EAST LINE SAID SEC. 13, 1065 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 5 Weld County Road No. 8 and No. 13 Annexation LEGAL DESCRIPTION A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE EAST HALF OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M. AND IN THE WEST HALF OF SECTIONS 18 AND 19 TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 67 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NE COR. SAID SEC. 13; THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE EAST LINE SAID SEC. 13, 1749 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING: THENCE ' CONTINUING ALONG THE AFORE DESCRIBED COURSE 2249 FEET; THENCE WEST 30 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST R.Q.W. LINE OF WELD COUNTY ROAD NO. 13; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID WEST R.O.W. LINE 1252 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH R.O.W. LINE OF WELD COUNTY ROAD NO. . 8; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID NORTH R.O.W. LINE 650 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 30 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SEC. 24, T1 N, R68W, 6 PM; THENCE EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SEC. 24, 680 FEET TO THE NE CORNER SAID SEC. 24; THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE EAST LINE SAID SEC. 24, 2640 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE EAST 1/4 COR. SAID SECTION 24; THENCE EAST 30 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST R.O.W. LINE OF WELD COUNTY ROAD NO. 13; THENCE NORTH 'ALONG SAID EAST R.O.W. LINE 6171 FEET, MORE OR LESS, -TO A POINT 30 EAST OF THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; .THENCE WEST 30 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 6 Linkus Annexation LEGAL DESCRIPTION THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH,. RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M. 7 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Dacono will hold a Public Hearing commencing at 7:00 o'clock p.m. , September 24, 1990, at the Dacono City Hall, 512 Cherry Street, Dacono, Colorado 80514. The purpose of the Public Hearing will be to determine whether certain properties for which petitions for annexation, to be known as the IKP-II Annexations, have been filed, meet the applicable requirements of the statutes of the State of Colorado and are eligible for annexation to the City of Dacono. Any person may appear at the Public Hearing and be heard regarding the matters under consideration. Copies of the petitions and the resolution finding that the petitions are in substantial compliance with the applicable laws of the State of Colorado are on file and available for public inspection in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Dacono, at the Dacono City Hall, 512 Cherry Street, Dacono, Colorado 80514. CITY OF DACONO, COLORADO By: /4/ City Clerk Publication Dates: August 23 and 30, 1990; September 6 and 13, 1990. 22/86 X , 4 RESOLUTION NO. 90-18 WHEREAS, petitions for annexation of certain properties, to be known as the IKP-II Annexations, the legal descriptions of which are attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by reference herein, have been filed with the City Council of the City of Dacono: and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the petitions: and WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to permit simultaneous consideration of the subject properties for annexation and for zoning, if requested in the petitions: and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the petitions and desires to adopt by Resolution its findings in regard to the petitions: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DACONO, COLORADO: Section X. The petitions are in substantial compliance with the applicable laws of the State of Colorado. Section 2. No election is required under §31-12-107 (2) , C.R.S. Section 3. No additional terms and conditions are to be imposed except any provided for in the petitions. Section 4. The City Council will hold a public hearing for the purpose of determining if the proposed annexations comply with §31-12-104, C.R.S. and with §31-12-105, C.R.S. , and will hold a public hearing to determine the appropriate zoning of the subject properties if requested in the petitions, at the Dacono City Hall, 512 Cherry Street, Dacono, Colorado 80514, at the following date and time: September 24, 1990 7:00 p.m. Section S. Any person may appear at such hearing and present evidence relative to the proposed annexations, or the proposed zoning if requested in the petitions. Section 6. Upon completion of the hearing, the City Council will set forth, by resolution, its findings and conclusions with reference to the eligibility of the proposed annexations, and whether the statutory requirements for the proposed annexations have been met, and further, will determine the appropriate zoning of the subject properties if requested in the petitions. 1 glytion 7 . If the City Council concludes, by resolution, that all statutory requirements have been met and that the proposed annexations are proper under the laws of the State of Colorado, the City Council will pass one or more ordinances annexing the subject properties to the city of Dacono, and will pans one or more ordinances zoning the subject properties if requested in the petition. IC) INTRODUCED, READ, SIGNED AND APPROVED this alit day or �, 1990. CITY OF DACONO, COLORADO By: l ot_F,s,f,Y• �� 1. or All EST: By:- �I1� r Cityity Cle Cle 21/97 . 2 l girr '1 nn,• 'Ty rrn m's" ^c FA 1: 2! C� r•,� E.•. TO T wC August 27, 1990 Mr. Brian A. Grubb Current Planner Weld County Department of Planning Services 913 Tenth Street Room 0342 Greeley, CO 80631 SUBJECT: Case Number ZPMH-1679, Vincent* Martinez Dear Mr. Grubb: I strongly oppose the request by Vincente Martinez for a Mobile Home Zoning Permit on Lot 6, Block 66, Aristocrat Ranchettes Subdivison, Weld County, Colorado. For obvious reasons, allowing this permit is to further condone the blatant deterioration of this neighborhood by both the Weld County Planning Department as a controlling agency and me as a homeowner. As I may be unable to attend the scheduled hearing on Wednesday, September 12, 1990, regarding this request, please understand my firm opinion on this subject. Sincerely, Wadies- Elaine Miller 15163 Barley Avenue Fort Lupton, CO 80621 857-2875, Home 666-7000, extension 4218, Work cc: George Kennedy/t County Commissioner tee, \s, .�. �•-� ,_•• ... 08190 15-OPT-EX CC'. - D TELEPHONE i FORM 905 STATE OF COLORADO (303) 866-2371 ^, C'? DIVISION OF PROPERTY TAXATION C�' ._• DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL AFFAIRS 419 STATE CENTENNIAL BUILDING �C DENVER, COLORADO 80203 � QETERMINATION IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF: Saint Gabriel, Archangel APPLICATION NO. 90-914 Anglican Catholic Church FILE N0. 62-01-449-(01) 1103 Tenth Avenue COUNTY Mad Greeley, CO 80631 PARCEL HO. 9961-08-2-OS-004 FOR EXEMPTION FROM GENERAL TAXATION OF PROPERTY CLAIMED TO BE OWNED AND USED SOLELY AND EXCLUSIVELY FOR RELIGIOUS PURPOSES. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: The North 60 ft of Lot 1, Block 86, in the City of Greeley. PERSONAL PROPERTY IS INCLUDED, AND IS GRANTED/DENIED EXEMPTION IN THE SAME PERCENTAGE AS THE REAL PROPERTY, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED BELOW. LEASED PERSONAL PROPERTY IS NOT INCLUDED. THE ADMINISTRATOR, HAVING REVIEWED THE APPLICATION AS PROVIDED IN COLORADO REVISED STATUTES, TITLE 39, ARTICLE 2, SECTION 117, HAS DETERMINED THAT SUCH EXEMPTION IS JUSTIFIED AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE INTENT OF THE LAW, AND EXEMPTION IS HEREBY GRANTED, THE SAME TO BE EFFECTIVE April 3, 1990. DATED AT DENVER, COLORADO THIS 30thDAY OF August 19S. aY M Y E. MUDOLEST OWN ACTING PROPERTY TAX ADMINISTRATOR (SEE REVERSE FOR APPEAL RIGHTS) (COPIES TO OWNER, ASSESSOR, TREASURER AND BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS) beOjc44° 15-OPT-EX TELEPHONE FORM 907R STATE OF COLORADO (303) 866-2371 REV. 1981 DIVISION OF PROPERTY TAXATION DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL AFFAIRS 419 STATE CENTENNIAL BUILDING DENVER, CO 80203 NOTICE pF FORFEITURE RESCINDED NOTICE NO. 90-62-001 FILE N0. 62-01-0069-(01) COUNTY: Weld PARCEL NO. 096117313n01 IN THE MATTER OF: Pioneer Post Club of Greeley and/or VFW Post 82121 2514 7th Avenue Greeley. CO 80631 CONCERNING THE EXEMPTION FROM GENERAL TAXATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY: Lots 1-6, Block 1 2nd Addn Garden City and Lots 11-12, Block 2 2nd Addn Garden City. ON July 21, 1990, THE DIVISION ISSUED A NOTICE THAT EXEMPTION OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY HAD BEEN FORFFIIFO,. IT HAS BEEN DETERMINED THAT THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IS ENTITLED TO EXEMPTION AND NOTICE NO. '0-6?-001 , DATED July 21, 1990, IS RESCINDED. EXEMPTION OF THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IS HEREBY CONTINUED EFFECTIVE January 1 199Q. DATED AT DENVER, COLORADO THIS 30th DAY OF August 19 90 . --"r� �� MARY £. HUDOLESTON ACTING PROPERTY TAX ADMINISTRATOR COPIES TO OWNER, ASSESSOR, TREASURER AND BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TV �p,;�. ., ,.• -c.C 08190 15-DPT-EX CT, ,;!` _ TELEPHONE FORM 905 �-� c STATE OF COLORADO (303) 866-2371 �:; ,. DIVISION OF PROPERTY TAXATION C! 72.r •‘ _ DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL AFFAIRS 419 STATE CENTENNIAL BUILDING DENVER, COLORADO 80203 DETERMINATION IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF: Saint Gabriel, Archangel APPLICATION NO. 90-214 Anglican Catholic Church FILE NO. 62-01-449-011 1103 Tenth Avenue COUNTY !Meld Greeley, CO 80631 PARCEL N0. 0961-08-2-05-0 4 FOR EXEMPTION FROM GENERAL TAXATION OF PROPERTY CLAIMED TO BE OWNED AND USED SOLELY AND EXCLUSIVELY FOR RELIGIOUS PURPOSES. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: The North 60 ft of Lot 1, Block 86, in the City of Greeley. PERSONAL PROPERTY IS INCLUDED, AND IS GRANTED/DENIED EXEMPTION IN THE SAME PERCENTAGE AS THE REAL PROPERTY, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED BELOW. LEASED PERSONAL PROPERTY IS NOT INCLUDED. THE ADMINISTRATOR, HAVING REVIEWED THE APPLICATION AS PROVIDED IN COLORADO REVISED STATUTES, TITLE 39, ARTICLE 2, SECTION 117, HAS DETERMINED THAT SUCH EXEMPTION IS JUSTIFIED AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE INTENT OF THE LAW, ANO EXEMPTION IS HEREBY GRANTED, THE SAME TO BE EFFECTIVE April 3, 1990. DATED AT DENVER, COLORADO THIS agthOAY OF Au9uet , 1990 . a'r(\ril\e.1pq. \, rac\_ MA Y E. HUDOLESTON ACTING PROPERTY TAX ADMINISTRATOR (SEE REVERSE FOR APPEAL RIGHTS) (COPIES TO OWNER, ASSESSOR, TREASURER AND BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS) (�j�"�' Q _ 40 C K� !U1','L.�(�•� G�1‘ " Tier. Of+ � Cr!. OC RTGU S Amp Regywsrgrl:rr_1 RIGHT TO APPEAL Colored° Revised Stints 1973, Title 39, Article 2, Sae 117 (S) provides, 'an appeal from any decision of the Property_ Tax Administrator may be taken by the Board of county commissioners of the county wherein such property is located. or by any owner of ;stable property in such county, or-by the owner of the property for which exemption is claimed if exemption has been denied or revoked in full or in par:. Any such appeal shall be taken to the Board of Assessment APPealS, and shall be taken no later than thirty days following the decision of the Property Tax'Administrator.' • • Forms and instructions for making such appeal may be obtained from the Board ' of Assessment Appeals, Debarment of Local Affairs, •SZ3 State Centennial Building, 1313 Sherman Street, Denver, CO 8x203. Telephone (302)1Mb-5880. RcEMPONSIBI'LITIES OF THE EXEMPT PROPERTY OIMZ Owners of property grsrrad exemption by this office ass: do the following to maintain their property's exemption from taxation: I. Notify this office within thi ry days of any change of • mailing address, or status or usage of the exempted prcoery (i.e., land has been sold and/or vacated and is no longer used). Property transferred by deed will be returned to the tax rolls by the county assessor. • II. Each year following the year in which exemption is granted, owners of such exempt property must file an annual Exam= Property Report on or before April 15. These reports arm supplied by the Division of Property Taxation early each year. The Division of Property Taxation takes no responsibility far repon not filed in a timely manner for any reason. It is the responsibility of tae exempt property wnerrto see •that these reports are received, completed and returned :o the Division of Property Taxation annually by April IS, and with the •appropriate filing fees. Contact this office.if your reports art not received in time.for* completion by the April 15 deadline each year. • • On all future correspondenae regarding this property, the owner should refer to the file number-shown on-this determination.. • CTNNTC - 15-OPT-EX TELEPHONE FORM 907R STATE OF COLORADO (303) 866-2371 REV. 1981 DIVISION OF PROPERTY TAXATION DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL AFFAIRS 419 STATE CENTENNIAL BUILDING DENVER, CO 80203 NOTICE OF FOREFITIRF RESCINDFII NOTICE N0. 90-h2-001 FILE N0. 62-01-0069-(pt1 COUNTY: Weld PARCEL NO. 096J1731POL IN THE MATTER OF: Pioneer Post Club of Greeley and/or VFW Post 42121 2514 7th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 CONCERNING THE EXEMPTION FROM GENERAL TAXATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY: Lots 1-6, Block 1 2nd Addn Garden City and Lots 11-12, Block 2 2nd Addn Garden City. ON July 21, 1990, THE DIVISION ISSUED A NOTICE THAT EXEMPTION OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY HAD BEEN FORFEITED,. IT HAS BEEN DETERMINED THAT THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IS ENTITLED TO EXEMPTION AND NOTICE N0. 90-67-001 , DATED July 21, 1990, IS RESCINDED. EXEMPTION OF THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IS HEREBY CONTINUED EFFECTIVE January 1. 1990_ DATED A7 DENVER, COLORADO THIS 30th DAY OF AuguSt 19 90 . \-\kin_\ pAA\ •,«� MARY E. HUDDLESTON ACTING PROPERTY TAX ADMINISTRATOR COPIES TO OWNER, ASSESSOR, TREASURER AND BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FAXED TO: 303-623-9222 NATURAL ENERGY RESOURCES COMPANY P,O.Box 567 • Palm*:Lake,Colorado 80133 • (719)481.200.1 • FAX(719)41-4013 August 27, 1990 Mr. Hubert A. Farbes, Jr. , President Denver Board of Water Commissioners 1600 W. 12th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80254 Re: Union Park Alternative To Two Forks Dam Dear Mr. Farbes: From your August 23rd reply to my August 16th letter, it is apparent you are being misinformed regarding the relative merits of Two Forks and the Union Park Water Conservation Project. Arapahoe County's latest industry supplied estimates indicate Union Park' s construction costs would be $334 million. Allowing 20% for contingencies, 15% for engineering and administration, $6 million for environmental mitigation, and $7 million for fees and owner's costs, the total 1989 development cost would be $464 million. The Corps ' hydrology modeling has confirmed when Union Park is used as drought backup storage for Denver's existing reservoirs, an average 60,000 acre feet from the untapped Gunnison Basin can increase Metro Denver's safe annual yield by 120,000 acre feet. This is 20% more than Two Forks. The unprecedented 2 for 1 "multiplier effect" is what gives Union Park an annualized yield cost of about half that of EPA' s latest $595 per acre foot estimate for Two Forks. Your point on the uncertainty of Union Park' s water rights is not valid. The Denver Water Department ' s 20 year water rights battle for Two Forks was quickly resolved by negotiation in a few days shortly before the Corps ' release of the Draft EIS. The water rights logjam was broken when the Department finally agreed to pay the Colorado River Water Conservancy District for West Slope compensatory storage. These very high mitigation costs were inexplicitly and illegally excluded from all Two Forks studies. The River District also soiled its own nest by agreeing to the further over depletion of the Upper Colorado Basin, while its wetter, untapped Gunnison Basin continues to lose nearly a million acre feet of Colorado entitled water to the down river states. Union Park' s water rights are on a much sounder footing than Two Forks for an equitable negotiated settlement based on balanced use of Colorado ' s water resources. Union Park is a multipurpose west Slope compensatory storage site that can be flexibly managed to provide needed drought protection for the river environments and wet lands of both slopes. For example, Union Park's massive, high • 10"� C.a , : ) 4-,• . 2 altitude storage can guarantee the doubling of the Colorado water Conservation Board 's minimum flows on the Taylor River during the worst drought cycles , while also providing an average 60,000 acre feet for Metro Denver. Its remote, off-river, sage covered site is truly unique, and far less objectionable to the environmental community. Union Park's cyclic storage will substantially enhance the Gunnison ' s water based economy by providing a world class Lake Trout fishery, and stabilizing the drastic fluctuations in Taylor Park Reservoir and the Taylor River. The innovative combining of advanced pumped storage technology with a naturally ideal reservoir site is what gives Union Park its unprecedented advantages . In short, Union Park is probably the most efficient, environmentally sound, multipurpose, water conservation project ever conceived especially in this new age of environmental enlightenment . Except for a last minute token review, at our insistence, the Metro Denver System Wide Analysis completely overlooked the detailed government studies on the Gunnison water source for East Slope growth. Two Forks objectors would have a field day in court with this illegal oversight. Even if EPA were to reverse its expected veto of your 25 year Two Forks application, your board would still be morally and legally obligated to consider the viable ongoing alternatives that were "overlooked" . The detailed EIS was effectively and improperly limited to those options that could be controlled by the Denver Water Department ' s water rights. These rights were secretly acquired in the Upper Colorado and South Platte Basins over the last 50 years with only one long-range concept in mind. As board members of a powerful public entity, your concerns and allegiance should surely be with the public -- not with the managers who have spent a lifetime promoting a single outmoded idea that has proven to be the most costly, environmentally damaging option. Because of the urgent need to minimize further waste of the state' s water and the public's funds, we again request that the Denver Water Department conduct an immediate, objective, preliminary analysis of Union Park. We stand ready to assist with briefings and engineering assistance. Thank you for considering this critical Colorado water issue. Sincerel , Allen D. (Dave) Miller, President ADM/bm cc: EPA, Denver Council Members, Metro Denver Water Providers, Arapahoe County, Colorado officials and Legislators. �..,Nmv‘l� ward of Wafer eommtsstoners "' `.• � 1600 W. 12th Avenue Denver,CO 80254 Phone(303)62860(10 a� ,, �/t 3� i Telecopier No.(303)6286509 HUBERT A.PARSES.JR,.President 4 / MALCOLM M.MURRAY,Sat Yice.Presdenr �11111U,y�� MONTE PASCOE DONALD L.KORTZ MS.ROMALNE PACHECO W.H.MILLER,Manager August 23, 1990 Allen D. (Dave) Miller, President Natural Energy Resources Company P.O. Box 567 Palmer Lake, Colorado 80133 Re: Correspondence dated July 24 and August 16, 1990 Regarding Union Park Proposal Dear Mr. Miller: X have received your letter of August 16, 1990, and as promised during our telephone conversation, have discussed with other members of the Denver Water Board your request fora personal presentation on the Union Park proposal. First of all, let me correct your August 16 letter regarding my alleged "view" on evaluation of your Union Park proposal. I advised you that, consistent with the Board's April 1989 Policy Statement, it is prepared to consider any legitimate proposals by its contract distributors or other third parties for utilization of Denver's system in the delivery of water supplies. However, Denver is committed by its agreement with many other project participants throughout the metropolitan area to pursue its 404 permit application for and with respect to the Two Forks project. It would be inappropriate to, and inconsistent with those agreements that this Board undertake or promote another major water develop- ment project at this time. You are badly mistaken in your assumption that the Denver water Board may, now or in the future, "evaluate" the Union Park proposal or some other water project as an "alternative" to the present 404 permit application. The Denver Water Board has not made any policy determination as to whether, in the event its existing 404 permit application is vetoed by the United States Environmental Protection Agency, the Board will undertake or promote any other major water storage project. I also take strong exception to your description of the Board and Department conduct as "stonewalling" the Union Park proposal. An objective review of the Union Park proposal by the Army Corps of Engineers, in the context of the systemwide and site specific EIS process, has demonstrated your proposal to be an inferior, not a superior alternative to other projects evaluated by or recommended for consideration (for the Denver metropolitan area) by the Corps. Allen D. (Dave) Miller, President August 23, 1990 Page 2 One of the more obvious and apparent reasons for the Corps' conclusion is the fact that Union Park proponents had not obtained conditional water rights, properly decreed under Colorado law, which entitle them to divert the waters identified by this • proposal. To my knowledge, you still have not resolved this rather elemental impediment to development of this proposal. The members of the Denver water Board have reviewed your written presentation of July 24, 1990. The Board members are also familiar with the variety of documentation you previously pre- sented, during the EIS process, regarding the Union Park proposal. At this time, the Board has concluded there is no need or good purpose served by further presentations from you regarding this proposal. Hub'rt A. Tarbes, Jr. a esident Denver Board of water Commissioners HAF/hc cc: Members of the Denver City Council Members of the Denver Water Board Mr. William H. Miller, Manager Denver Water Board FAXED TO: 303-623-9222 NATURAL ENERGY RESOURCES COMPANY P,O.Box 567 • Palmer Lake,Colorado 80133 • ave 661-2003 • FAX(714)481-4013 August 16, 1990 Mr. Hubert A. Farbes, Jr. President, Denver Water Board 1600 W. 12th Avenue Denver, CO. 80254 Re: Union Park Alternative To Trio Forks Daum Dear Mr. Farbes: ;hank you for your telephone call today in response to my July 24th letter. I am sorry, but I can not agree with your view that a Denver Water Department evaluation of the Union Park Water Conservaton alternative should be deferred until EPA rules on your smeller Two Forks counterproposal. Union Park is one of the major structural alternatives identified by EPA's staff that was improperly excluded in the EIS from detailed consideration. This alternatives oversight is one of the basic legal reasons for the pending Two Forks veto. The continued "stonewalling" of a superior alternative in favor of a smaller, less efficient Two Forks would only compound the earlier travesty. Even the Corps of Engineers' belated analysis confirmed Union Park's unprecedented 2 for 1 hydrology that gives it major yield, cost, and environmental advantages over any size Two Forks. Over the past several years the Metro Denver Water Providers have Chosen to follow the Denver Water Department's leadership in the single minded pursuit of an obsolete project that has proven to be the most expensive, environmentally damaging option. Now, instead of pursuing an even less efficient variation, the Department bears an urgent moral responsibility to help find an economical, environmentally sound, water alternative for Metro Denver's citizens. Arapahoe County and the city of Aurora are already cooperating on developing the best water supply option from the wetter, untapped, overlooked GUnnison Basin. The engineers who have objectively evaluated Union Park's massive, high altitude, off-river storage, know it is the ideal answer for West and East Slope drought protection, and Metro Denver's water future. The basic reason Arapahhoe County has not formally offered Union Park as an alternative to Two Forks is to avoid being labeled a Metro spoiler before the veto is final. To help with the Denver Water Department's long overdue decision to evaluate the Union Park alternative, I would be honored to provide an informative presentation for your board at its earliest conven'ence. is }• Allen D. ( ve) Miller President ADM/bm cc: Denver City Council Members, EPA (Ms. LaJuana Wilcher), Arapahoe County. Pule 2, TI IC GUNNISON COUNTRY TIMES, August 15. 1990 Times forum Cooperation is necessary for state 's water future The front page of the July 25th In 1982 the founders of Natural actions,Bratton's encouragcmart, Gunnison Country Times reported Energy Resources Company and the Gunnison Districts initia- that cooperation between regions is (NECO)decided to defer the trans- lion of Phase I that NECO decided the key to Colorado's water future. mountain phase of its Union Park the time was right to apply in water This theme was expressed by most Project until the demand and politics court for Union Park's diversion speakers at the 15th annual were clever.The climate improved rights. Colorado Water Workshop. somewhat in 1984 when prominent In]ate 1986 the city of Gunnison However,on page 2 the ghost West and East Slope leaders formed council members voted to purchase writer for POWER's weekly Taylor the Colorado Alliance to cooperate some Union Park water rights,stor- Talks column continues to attack on water storage projects to save the age and power from NECO.This past and present city of Gunnison state's Colorado River Compact purchase had a total 1986 value of officials for cooperating with the entidements before these waters approximately S50 million,and the Union Park Water Conservation were permanently forfeited to cost to the city was only 52,000 Project Union Park's large,high. California and Arizona A special down and 3198.000 upon construe- :dulude storage concept is specrfi- state water development sales tax lion.In 1988 NECO sold Union catty designed to share a small per. was being proposal,and the Park and its contract with the city-of to cent of the Gunnison's surplus flood Alliance's initial goal was to con- Arapahoe.Counry for 52.2 million. waters with dryer populated areas, sauct a 250,000 acre-feet reservoir This was an extraordinary coup for while providing needed drought pro- on the West Slope that could be used the city.Unfortunately,in early tcction for Gunnison's water-basal for recreation,and diversion of 1990 a new city council caved in to economy. 50,000 acreefeet t0 the East sl POWER's founder may be well- Ol disruptive political tactics from In tare 1985,the Gunnison re pre- POWER and Rep.Scat McGinnis. meaning,but her uncompromising sentative On the Colorado Water and Arapahoe County has not released slogans and tactics are misleading Power Authority(Dick Bratton) the city from its contract obliga- the public, intimidating local politi- encouraged NECO to sell its Union lions cal leaders and damaging proles- Park Project to the Authority.Tire If POWER wants to hang some- sional careers. intent was to use Union Park as a one for Union Park,it should look The democratic process would be cash generator to concoct mere- to the players involved in these his- better served if POWER's leadership ation reservoirs for the West Slope. torical facts.It should also blame would stop questioning the loyalty Dick indicated that 50.000 acre-feet $eo$raphy for making the Upper Of anyone who is not bound to the would be consistent with the • Gunnison thewettest, selfish slogan of"not one drop over Alliance's objective and a politicallyuntapped the hill."Instead,POWER's leaders acceptable amount for export from water area in Colorado. should consider some of the histori- the Upper Gunnison.Although the - 1 uncompromising___ stance"not"not s cal and technical perspectives of Authority declined NECO's propos- not one drop over the hill"is a far cry from inter-region coopera- those who have more water manage- al,it did initiate the Phase I Upper uon based on reasoned analysis of of ment experience. Gunnison Water Study to evaluate for example,during the 1950s, alternative water and power export Colorado's water supply and am the Bureau of Reclamation conduct- projects to generate cash for cnhanc- demand situation,Instead of ni]am- ed detailed studies that identified up ing the Upper Gunnison's water- matory slogans and unfair attacks on to 450,000 acre-feet of surplus based economy.Phase I was con- the loyalty and professional;ntcgri- Gunnison flood waters that could be ducted at the request of the Uppei ry of public officials and advisors, diverted out of basin without Gunnison River Water Conservancy POWER should try to speeiDealy' impacting senior Gunnison water District,the Uncompahgre Valley refute Union Parks extraordinary rights.In 1974 a study by MOrean Water Users Association,and the technical claims that the project will Engineering,Inc.,of Delta room- Colorado River Wata Conservancy ewe Gunnison's cnvuon- mended that the city of Gunnison District meet and water-basal economy. concoct a water storage capability. Unfortunately,most of the In the meantime,Gunnison's Water Resource Consultants,Inc.,of study's funds were politically was[- elected officials should have the Gunnison conducted a similar study ed on trying to justify a Gunnison courage to resist unreasonable polit- in 1981,and as a:auk,the city now controlled diversion direct.from'thc tall tat tics from a few uninformed has reservoir decrees on the Taylor existing;Taylor Park Reservoieit- activists. and East rivers,as well as Antelope was only after the Alliance's , Dave Miner Creek NECO president Testimony Before Legislative Interim Committee On Boards And Commissions by Allen D. (Dave) Miller, President Natural Energy Resources Company August 15, 1990 I am president of Natural Energy Resources Company testifying for the private sector. Since 1982, our company has been developing two major water projects in Colorado. Our $ billion, 1 ,000 megawatt, Rocky Point Peaking Power Project is scheduled to come on line in 1997. We have recently sold our Union Park Water Conservation Project to Arapahoe County, and this project has the potential of being a lower cost alternative to Two Forks Dam. It also has substantial drought benefits for the environments of both slopes. My testimony is related primarily to Colorado's organization for managing its vital water resources. Historically, most water development in Colorado was done by private initiative. However, the process has become so uncertain and complex, there are very few private companies willing to invest in Colorado' s water future. The situation is almost as difficult for public entities. Although Colorado's high topography generates much of the water for the West, we paradoxically have the highest water development costs and fees in the region. From our perspective, we believe the Colorado Legislature is largely responsible for the state' s water development quagmire. We also believe there is a way to cure our water paralysis, if the Legislature is willing to take some bold corrective measures, i .e. 1 . Too Many Agencies Colorado has a proliferation of water girr boards, authorities, districts, and offices, with overlapping responsibilities for planning and managing its water. We recommend a special legislative task force to Clearly define specific functions and reduce the number of agencies involved in water decisions. As a starter, the functions of the recently formed Colorado Water Resources And Power Development Authority should be returned to the Colorado Water Conservation Board and the State Engineers Office. 2. Too Many Attorneys About 70% of the nation's water attorneys practice in Colorado' s highly inefficient water management system. This group dominates the state's water management agencies. Attorneys are not trained to efficiently conceive, plan, and develop water resources in the public interest. New legislation should be enacted that would require more engineers and water resource specialists to head and man the state's water management agencies. Water attorneys should be used more as technical advisers for our agencies, instead of managers and board members. 3 . Not Enough Planning Colorado is the only Western state without some sort of state water planning and policy effort. The charters of all of our water agencies require planning, but in reality none do it for fear of upsetting one special interest or another. The proposed Two Forks Dam is probably the best example of ineffective state water planning. None of our state agencies evaluated Two Forks within the context of the state's overall water resources and demand picture. As a result, we continue to overdeplete the Upper Colorado Basin while better water sources, such as the untapped Gunnison Basin, are not considered. Instead of planning in the public interest, water rights are the primary driving force in Colorado. The Legislature should initiate a definitive state water planning and policy effort. This effort should be carried out by a special commission of water resource experts, who are not representing any special interest group or region. Thank you for your consideration. (719)481-2003 PUBLIC lUTil1TIES �Wl,�3p�ty AUG 311990 (Decision No. R90-1148) ` BEFO THE PUBLIC oricKupccoreq'SION y„ or THE STATE OF COLORADO * * * IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF ) DOCKET NO. 90A-073R THE UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY ) TO PROVIDE AGENCY SERVICES ) RECOMMENDED DECISION OF DIRECT FROM ITS NATIONAL CUSTOMER ) ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE SERVICE CENTER AT ST. LOUIS, ) JOHN B. STUELPNAGF.L MISSOURI TO CUSTOMERS SERVED ) THROUGH ITS LA SALLE, CHEYENNE. WELLS) AND STERLING AGENCIES AND TO CLOSE ) SAID AGENCIES. ) August 24, 1990 Appearances: James D. Benak, Esq., and Paul A. Martin, Esq., Omaha, Nebraska, and Mark C. Hansen, Esq., Denver, Colorado, for Applicant Union Pacific Railroad Company; Peter J. Stapp, Assistant Attorney General, Denver, Colorado, For Staff of the Public Utilities Commission, and ; Ms. Wendy Shinn, Lamar, Colorado, County Attorney for Cheyenne County. STATEMENT On January 23, 1990, The Union Pacific Railroad Company filed this application seeking an order of the Commission authorizing The Union Pacific to discontinue and close agencies at La Salle, Cheyenne Wells, and Sterling, Colorado, and provide agency services direct from its National Customer Service Center at St. Louis, Missouri . The Public Utilities Commission issued its Notice of Applications Filed on February 1 , 1990, and Staff of the Public Utilities Commission filed its Entry of Appearance and Notice of Intervention on February 2, 1990. Letters of protest were received from the Trinidad Bean and Elevator Company, Agland, Inc., The Great Western Railway Company, Western Sugar Company, Edward and Betty Weber, the Colorado Wheat Administrative Committee, Marvin and Carole Lowe, the Chamber of Commerce of Cheyenne Wells, and the Town of Cheyenne Wells, Colorado. cif 01151010 r The protest letters of Agland, Inc. , and the Trinidad Bean and Elevator Company were subsequently withdrawn. A late filed letter by Nichols Tillage Tools, Inc., protesting the closure of the Sterling agency was filed May 9, 1990. During hearing on this application, The Union Pacific Railroad Company withdrew that portion of the application seeking to close the Sterling, Colorado agency. By Order Setting Hearing and Notice of Hearing issued May 1 , 1990, this matter was set to be heard June 4, 1990, at 10 a.m., in the United Bank of Greeley-Community Room, 1540 8th Avenue, Greeley, Colorado, and on June 6, 1990, at 10 a.m., in the Cheyenne County Courthouse-County Courtroom, 51 South First, Cheyenne Wells, Colorado 80810. Hearing commenced as scheduled and Exhibit Nos. 1 through 16 were marked for identification. Exhibit Nos. 1 through 6 and 8 through 16 were admitted into evidence. Exhibit No. 7 was not offered. At the conclusion of hearing the parties were given a period of ten days in which to file closing statements or statements of position. Staff of the Public Utilities Commission filed its Position Statement June 15, 1990, and Applicant, The Union Pacific Railroad Company filed a Closing Argument June 8, 1990. Pursuant to the provisions of § 40-6-109, C.R.S., the administrative law judge transmits to the Commission the record and exhibits of this proceeding along with this written recommended decision. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLMONS THEREON Based on all the evidence of record the following facts are found and conclusions thereon drawn: 1 . The Union Pacific Railroad Company is a corporation authorized to do business as a common carrier by railroad in the State of Colorado, and other states, in interstate and intrastate commerce. 2. Applicant provides daily freight train service between la Salle, Colorado, Cheyenne, Colorado, Denver, Colorado, Greeley, Colorado, and Ft. Collins, Colorado. Additionally, The Union Pacific provides daily freight train service between Cheyenne wells, Colorado, Denver, Colorado, and Oakly. Kansas. Trains leave Denver on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday, and trains leave Oakly on Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday. Unit grain trains and various other extra train movements are provided to and from Cheyenne Wells as required. 3. The La Salle agency facilities consist of a one story office building, approximately 30 feet by 60 feet and a scale house measuring approximately eight feet by eight feet located approximately 200 yards north of the depot. The Cheyenne Wells agency facilities consist of a 50 foot by 100 foot old wood frame depot. The depot is no 2 longer in use and the agent's office i5 presently located in a privately owned office space in Cheyenne Wells. 4, There is a steady amount of business which both originates and terminates at La Salle, Colorado. Revenue for such rail traffic is as follows: YDAR TRAFFIC ORIGINATING AT TRAFFIC TERMINATING AT LA SALLE. COLORADO AT LA SALLE. COLORADO 1986 $50,348 $280,627 1897 $13,177 $417.763 1988 $44,146 $955,577 1989 $21,877 $276,305 (January through August) Similarly, in Cheyenne Wells, Colorado, the revenues are as follows: YEAR TRAFFIC ORIGINATING AT TRAFFIC TERMINATING AT CHEYWE WELLS AT CHEYENNE WELLS 1966 $5,202.012 $ 1 ,844 1987 $2,858,535 none 1988 $8,377,468 none 1989 (January through $4,609,060 $ 907 August) 5. Station expenses attributable to the La Salle agency exclusive of superintendence, maintenance, depreciation. insurance and taxes (other than payroll taxes) for the year 1988 . $81,713, Of this amount payroll and related expenses totaled $67,126. Expenses for the period January through August 1989 were $59,577 with payroll and related expenses of $40.024. In Cheyenne Wells, total operating expenses for the year 1988 were $45.677, with payroll and related expenses of $44,164. For the period January through August 1989 total operation expenses were $27,698 with payroll and related expenses, of $27,127. In each instance, the payroll and related expenses would be eliminated and there would be possible reduction in other operating expenses. 6. Agents at both La Salle and Cheyenne Wells, Colorado no longer have essential duties or responsibilities: Changes in technology, particularly in communications, have resulted in centralization of 3 Applicant's operation at its National Customer Service Center at St. Louis, Missouri. The present functions of an agency are primarily to relay information from the National Customer Service Center in Missouri to shippers. The customer service center is open 24 hours a day, seven days per week; the local agency is available monday through friday between the hours of 7 a.m. and 4 p.m. All crew communications are provided from Applicant's Dispatch Center in Omaha, Nebraska. 7. The agents involved in each of these stations may be reassigned within Union Pacific in lieu of a new hire. Although the agent's salary itself would continue, the costs of new hire would be unnecessary and result in a savings to Applicant. Local shippers would prefer to deal with an agent on a personal basis, however, the shippers are able to obtain all information by telephone and it is not reasonable to require the Union Pacific to maintain the agencies at either La Salle • or Cheyenne wells. The public will not suffer any substantial inconvenience or reduction of service if this application is granted. Pursuant to paragraph 40-6-109, C.R.S., it is recommended that the Commission enter the following order. ORDER IT IS ORCERED THAT: 1 . The Union Pacific Roadroad Company is hereby authorized to provide agency services direct from a National Customer Service Center at St. Louis, Missouri for customers served through its La Salle and Cheyenne Wells, Colorado agencies, and close said agencies. 2. This Recommended Decision shall be effective on the day it becomes the Decision of the Commission, if that is the case, and is entered as of the date above. 3. As provided by S 40-6-109, C.R.S., copies of this Recommended Decision shall be served upon the parties, who may file exceptions to it. a. IF NO EXCEPTIONS ARE FILED WITHIN 20 DAYS AFTER SERVICE OR WITHIN ANY EXTENDED PERIOD OF TIME AUTHORIZED, OR UNLESS THE DECISION IS STAYED BY THE COMMISSION UPON ITS OWN MOTION, THE RECOMMENDED DECISION SHALL BECOME THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSION AND SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF S 40-6-114, • C.R.S. b. IF A PARTY SEEKS TO AMEND, MODIFY, ANNUL, OR REVERSE BASIC FINDINGS OF FACT IN ITS EXCEPTIONS, THAT PARTY MUST RE?VEST AND PAY FOR A TRANSCRIPT TO BE FILED, OR THE PARTIES MAY STIPULATE TO PORTIONS OF THE TRANSCRIPT 4 ACCORDING TO THE PROCEDURE STATED IN S 40-6-113, C.R.S. IF NO TRANSCRIPT OR STIPULATION IS FILED. THE COMMISSION IS BOUND BY THE FACTS SET OUT BY THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE AND THE PARTIES CANNOT CHALLENGE THESE FACTS. THIS WILL LIMIT WHAT THE COMMISSION CAN REVIEW IF EXCEPTIONS ARE FILED. 4. If exceptions to this Decision are filed, they shall not exceed 30 pages in length, unless the Commission for good cause shown permits this limit to be exceeded. THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION IS E A L) OF THE STATE OF COLORADO JOHN B. STUELPNAGEL Administrative Law Judge JS:jkm:0558A 5 :4� -• v; " 4, `r.? 'J, V 103,£. THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION 1� -- OF THE STATE OF COLORADO * * * THE APPLICATION OF UNITED POWER, ) INC., FORMERLY KNOWN AS UNION RURAL ) ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC., FOR A ) CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE ) AND NECESSITY TO EXERCISE FRANCHISE ) NOTICE OF APPLICATION FIFO RIGHTS IN THE TOWN OF FREDERICK, ) WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, FOR THE ) DOCKET NO. 90A-525EF PRUCHASE. TRANSMISSION, ) DISTRIBUTION, AND SALE OF ) ELECTRICAL ENERGY IN SAID TOWN OF ) FREDERICK. ) TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS, FIRMS, OR CORPORATIONS: You are notified that this application has been filed with the Colorado Public Utilities Commission by United Power, Inc.. formerly known as Union Rural Electric Association, Inc.. 18551 East 16th Avenue, Brighton, Colorado 80601 for a certificate of public convenience and necessity to exercise franchise rights in the Town of Frederick, Weld County. Colorado, for the purchase. transmission, distribution, and sale of electrical energy in said city, as more specifically stated in the application which is available for public inspection at the Commission office located at 1580 Logan Street. OL 2, Denver, Colorado 80203. Any person desiring to intervene or participate as a party in this proceeding shall file his petition for leave to intervene, or under the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, file other appropriate pleadings to become a party, within ten days after the date of this notice. If you do not wish to intervene or become a party, but desire to file comments, you may send written comments addressed to the Public Utilities Commission, Office Level 2 (01 2). Logan Tower, 1580 Logan Street, Denver, Colorado 80203. (303) 894-2070. This application will be processed in accordance with the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, found at 4 CCR 723-1. This proceeding may be processed by the Commission without a hearing if no interventions or petitions to intervene are timely filed in accordance with g 40-6-109(5). C.R.S. In the event interventions are filed or if the Commission upon its own motion sets this matter for hearing, the Applicant shall certify, in writing. to the Commission Secretary that it desires ether to proceed to hearing or to withdraw its application. This certification shall be filed within 30 days after the notice period expires, where interventions have been filed, or within 30 days after the Applicant has been notified that this matter will be set for hearing upon the Commission's own motion. within ten days after filing the certification, the Applicant shall file ten copies of the testimony, or a detailed summary of the testimony of each witness who is expected to testify in the Applicant's direct case. The Applicant shall also file a list of exhibits and ten copies of each of its exhibits with the Commission at the time it files its certification. Copies of the foregoing documents shall be served upon all parties to the proceeding in accordance with the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure. Each Intervenor shall file with the Commission at least 20 days before the first day of the hearing ten copies of the testimony, or a detailed summary, of each of its witnesses, with ten copies of each of its exhibits, and shall serve copies on all parties. Parties to a proceeding are responsible for reviewing the Commission's file to determine who are the parties to this proceeding in order to properly serve parties with copies of pieadings. , No witness shall. Lt parultted Lu S:esiify, nor shall any document be received in evidence, except in rebuttal, unless filed and served as provided in this notice. If a party does not meet these requirements and those found in the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, the Commission may dismiss the application or intervention upon motion filed by any other party, unless good cause is shown. No motion for continuance shall be granted if filed within 20 days before the first day of the hearing, except for good cause shown. The Commission Secretary shall consider hearing dates and places within 15 days after the Applicant's certification has been received, and each party shall notify the Secretary within that time of the number of days the party expects the hearing to take, the location where the party desires the hearing to be held, and existing commitments during the following 180-day period which will prevent the party from appearing. If any party fails to so notify the Secretary of the Commission, the party will be deemed to have consented to the hearing date and location determined by the Secretary. Parties will be notified by the Commission of the hearing date, time, and location. Applicants must appear at the hearing and present evidence in support of their application. Other parties may appear and present evidence in accordance ' with their interests. Public testimony will also be received if offered, and if a hearing is held. No exception to the procedure described in this notice shall be made except upon timely motion showing good cause. Nothwithstanding the provisions of this notice, if an Applicant files copies of exhibits and a list of witnesses with its application, the above time requirements shall be accelerated. The Commission also may provide for expedited procedure by modifying or eliminating any of 2 4 the above requirements except those relating to notice and opportunity to be heard for good cause shown or upon its own motion. (SEAL) JAMES P. $PIERS Executive Secretary �.O1SSlOAr O4" Dated at Denver. Colorado this �;7 - -27' 1 - -mil 30th day of August. 1990. IA j� ` 0,:i i ti i . 0 d�, �y�b d * pC... 2615J 3 NOTIFICATION OF PROCEEDINGS O�,O -e0O'e CO MISSION TOOK THE BELOW ACTIONS TO ESTABLISH THE ENVIRONMENTAL 'RE ONS£ FUND. PAYORS OF THE CONSERVATION LEVY AND ENVIRONMENTAL RE ONSE FUND ARE BEING FURNISHED INSTRUCTIONS' FOR PAYMENT PROCEDURES IN �SGQ A Y OF THE RULES A LETTER. YO REGULATIONS. "PLACE RULES 701, 702, AND 703 INTO 't0 BEFORE THE OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO IN THE MATTER OF THE PROMULGATION ) CAUSE NO. 1 AND ESTABLISHMENT OF RULES FOR ) . THE ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE: FUND ) ORDER NO. 1-105 OF THE OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION ) COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO) REPORT OF THE COMMISSION This cause came on for hearing before the Commission on August 20, 1990 at 8 :30 a.m. , in Room 101, State Education Building, 201 East Colfax, Denver, Colorado, after giving Notice of Hearing as required by law, on the Commission's own, motion to establish the Environmental Response Fund and to fix the amount of the surcharge for the Environmental Response Fund. In May 1990 the Oil and Gas Conservation Act was amended by House Bill 90-1232 to establish the Oil and Gas Environmental Response Fund which is to be funded by a surcharge not to exceed two-tenths of one mill on the dollar, with the surcharge imposed on the market value at the well of all oil and natural gas produced, saved, and sold or transported from the field where produced within the State of Colorado. The Commission is to by order, fix the amount of such surcharge in the first instance and may from time to time, reduce or increase the amount previously fixed. FINDINGS The Commission finds as follows: 1. That a Notice of Hearing containing the time, place and purpose of the hearing has been given in all respects as required by law. 2. The Commission has jurisdiction over the subject matter embraced in said Notice, and of the parties interested therein, and jurisdiction to promulgate the hereinafter prescribed order. 3. That Article 60 of title 34, Colorado Revised Statutes was amended by House Bill 90-1232 to create an Environmental Response Fund and that the Commission should adopt a rule to establish such a fund. 4. That the Commission should fix the surcharge in the first instance at two-tenths of one mill on the dollar. 5 . That the statement of basis and purpose is adopted. ORDER IT IS ORDERED, that the following additions to the rules and regulations are approved by the Commission and shall read as follows : 701. INTRODUCTION The rules and regulations in this section pertain to the establishment of the Environmental Response Fund as authorized by House Bill 90-1232 and 34-60-124 C.R.S. , 1973 as amended. 702. GENERAL There is established within the Oil and Gas Conservation Commission an Environmental Response Fund to be used to mitigate adverse environmental impacts resulting from the drilling, operation, or production of oil and gas from wells which have been abandoned or plugged nand abandoned. V" (51) 116)C16 � a 703 . SURCHARGE - The surcharge for the Environmental Response Fund shall be fixed at two-tenths of one mill on the dollar commencing July 1, 1990., with the surcharge applied to the market value at the well of all oil and natural gas produced, saved, and sold or transported from the field where produced in this state. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the Commission expressly reserves its right, after notice and hearing, to alter, amend or repeal any and/or all of the above order .ENTERED this — c 2 " / 1 day of a ! , 1990, as o£ August 20, 1990. U.I OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO i f / ,e ' BY / �C2Z-4 �i{�tte Dennis Bicknell, Secretary Dated at Suite 380 1580 Logan Street Denver, Colorado 80203 05681 I - 2 - _._ ..._ f rec of oroc.) BEFORE THE OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO IN THE MATTER OF THE PROMULGATION ) CAUSE NO. 112 AND ESTABLISHMENT OF FIELD RULES ) DOCKET NO. 9-1 TO GOVERN OPERATIONS IN THE IGNACIO ) BLANCO FIELD, LA PLATA COUNTY ) COLORADO ) NOTICE OF HEARING TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES AND TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: On June 17, 1988, the Commission issued Order No. 112-60 which established 320-acre drilling and spacing units for the production of methane gas from the Fruitland coal seams underlying certain lands in the Ignacio Blanco Field including Sections 22 & 23, Township 32 North, Range 10 West, N.M.P.M. , with the units to consist of the E1/2 and W1/2 or the N1/2 and s1/2 of a governmental section with the permitted well to be located in the NE1/4 and SW1/4 of each unit. On August 3, 1990, Amoco Production Company, filed with the Commission a verified application for an order pooling all the interests in the drilling and spacing unit consisting of the E1/2 E1/2 of Section 22 and the W1/2 of Section 23, Township 32 North, Range 10 West, N.M.P.M. for the development and operation of the Fruitland coal seams underlying said unit and the production of gas of said formation, pursuant to the provisions of 34-60-116, C.R.S. , 1973, as amended. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the Oil and Gas Conservation Commission of the State of Colorado, pursuant to the above, has scheduled the above-entitled matter for hearing on: Date: Monday, September 17, 1990 Tuesday, September 18, 1990 Time: 8:30 a.m. Place: Room 101, State Education Building 201 East Colfax Avenue Denver, Colorado 80203 Pursuant to said hearing in the above-entitled matter at the time and place aforesaid, or at any adjourned meeting, the Commission will enter such orders as it deems appropriate to prevent the waste of oil and gas, either or both, in the operations of said field, and to carry out the purposes of the statute. Any interested party desiring to protest the granting of the application or to intervene should file with the Commission a written protest or a notice to intervene no later than September 11, 1990, briefly stating the basis of the protest or intervention. Such interested party shall, at the same time, serve a copy of the protest or notice to intervene to the person filing the application. A fee of forty-five dollars ($45.00) shall accompany each document filed with the Commission. IN THE NAME OF THE STATE OF COLORADO OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO By S/Ineye 441 Dennis R., Bic ne 1, Secretary Dated at Suite 380 Applicant's Address: 1580 Logan Street J.W. Hawkins Denver, Colorado 80203 Amoco Production Company August 21, 1990 P.O. Box 800 Denver, CO 80201 7107C _. aEMEM-Ek BEFORE THE OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO IN THE MATTER OF THE PROMULGATION ) CAUSE NO. 112 AND ESTABLISHMENT OF FIELD RULES ) DOCKET NO. 9-2 TO GOVERN OPERATIONS IN THE IGNACIO ) BLANCO FIELD, LA PLATA COUNTY ) COLORADO ) NOTICE OF HEARING TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES AND TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: On June 17, 1988, the Commission issued Order No. 112-60 which established 320-acre drilling and spacing units for the production of methane gas from the Fruitland coal seams underlying certain lands in the Ignacio Blanco Field including Section 1, Township 34 North, Range 7 West, N.M.P.M. , with the units to consist of the E1/2 and W1/2 or the N1/2 and S1/2 of a governmental section with the permitted well to be located in the NE1/4 and SW1/4 of each unit. On August 3, 1990, Amoco Production Company, filed with the Commission a verified application for an order pooling all the interests in the drilling and spacing unit consisting of the W1/2 of Section 1, Township 34 North, Range 7 West, N.M.P.M. for the development and operation of the Fruitland coal seams underlying said unit and the production of gas of said formation, pursuant to the provisions of 34-60-116, C.R.S. , 1973, as amended. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the Oil and Gas Conservation Commission of the State of Colorado, pursuant to the above, has scheduled the above-entitled matter for hearing on: Date: Monday, September 17 , 1990 Tuesday, September 18, 1990 Time: 8: 30 a.m. Place: Room 101, State Education Building 201 East Colfax Avenue Denver, Colorado 80203 Pursuant to said hearing in the above-entitled matter at the time and place aforesaid, or at any adjourned meeting, the Commission will enter such orders as it deems appropriate to prevent the waste of oil and gas, either or both, in the operations of said field, and to carry out the purposes of the statute. Any interested party desiring to protest the granting of the application or to intervene should file with the Commission a written protest or a notice to intervene no later than September 11, 1990, briefly stating the basis of the protest or intervention. Such interested party shall, at the same time, serve a copy of the protest or notice to intervene to the person filing the application. A fee of forty-five dollars ($45.00) shall accompany each document filed with the Commission. IN THE NAME OF THE STATE OF COLORADO OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO By �l� is A',r . I Dennis R. Blckne , Secretary Dated at Suite 380 Applicant's Address: 1580 Logan Street J.W. Hawkins Denver, Colorado 80203 Amoco Production Company August 21, 1990 P.O. Box 800 Denver, CO 80201 7108C BEFORE rHE OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO IN THE MATTER OF THE PROMULGATION ) CAUSE NO. 112 AND ESTABLISHMENT OF FIELD RULES ) DOCKET NO. 9-3 TO GOVERN OPERATIONS IN THE IGNACIO ) BLANCO FIELD, LA PLATA COUNTY ) COLORADO ) NOTICE OF HEARING TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES AND TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: On June 17, 1988, the Commission issued Order No. 112-60 which established 320-acre drilling and spacing units for the production of methane gas from the Fruitland coal seams underlying certain lands in the Ignacio Blanco Field including Section 1, Township 34 North, Range 7 West, N.M.P.M. , with the units to consist of the E1/2 and W1/2 or the N1/2 and S1/2 of a governmental section with the permitted well to be located in the NE1/4 and SW1/4 of each unit. On August 3, 1990, Amoco Production Company, filed with the Commission a verified application for an order pooling all the interests in the drilling and spacing unit consisting of the E1/2 of Section 1, Township 34 North, Range 7 Nest, N.M.P.M. for the development and operation of the Fruitland coal seams underlying said unit and the production of gas of said formation, pursuant to the provisions of 34-60-116, C.R.S. , 1973, as amended. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the Oil and Gas Conservation Commission of the State of Colorado, pursuant to the above, has scheduled the above-entitled matter for hearing on: Date: Monday, September 17, 1990 Tuesday, September 18, 1990 Time: 8:30 a.m. Place: Room 101, State Education Building 201 East Colfax Avenue Denver, Colorado 80203 Pursuant to said hearing in the above-entitled matter at the time and place aforesaid, or at any adjourned meeting, the Commission will enter such orders as it deems appropriate to prevent the waste of oil and gas, either or both, in the operations of said field, and to carry out the purposes of the statute. Any interested party desiring to protest the granting of the application or to intervene should file with the Commission a written protest or a notice to intervene no later than September 11, 1990, briefly stating the basis of the protest or intervention. Such interested party shall, at the same time, serve a copy of the protest or notice to intervene to the person filing the application. A fee of forty-five dollars ($45.00) shall accompany each document filed with the Commission. IN THE NAME OF THE STATE OF COLORADO OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO By 4, Glemall Dennis BicTcne�l, Secretary Dated at Suite 380 Applicant's Address: 1580 Logan Street J.W. Hawkins Denver, Colorado 80203 Amoco Production Company August 21, 1990 P.O. Box 800 Denver, CO 80201 7109C BEFORE THE OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO IN THE MATTER OF THE PROMULGATION ) CAUSE NO. 112 AND ESTABLISHMENT OF FIELD RULES ) DOCKET NO. 9-4 TO GOVERN OPERATIONS IN THE IGNACIO ) BLANCO FIELD, LA PLATA COUNTY ) COLORADO ) NOTICE OF HEARING TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES AND TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: On June 17, 1988, the Commission issued Order No. 112-60 which established 320-acre drilling and spacing units for the production of methane gas from the Fruitland coal seams underlying certain lands in the Ignacio Blanco Field including Section 20, Township 33 North, Range 10 West, N.M.P.M. , with the units to consist of the E1/2 and W1/2 or the N1/2 and S1/2 of a governmental section with the permitted well to be located in the NE1/4 and SW1/4 of each unit. On August 3, 1990, Amoco Production Company, filed with the Commission a verified application for an order pooling all the interests in the drilling and spacing unit consisting of the E1/2 of Section 20, Township 33 North, Range 10 West, N.M.P.M. for the development and operation of the Fruitland coal seams underlying said unit and the production of gas of said formation, pursuant to the provisions of 34-60-116, C.R.S. , 1973, as amended. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the Oil and Gas Conservation Commission of the State of Colorado, pursuant to the above, has scheduled the above-entitled matter for hearing on: • Date: Monday, September 17, 1990 Tuesday, September 18, 1990 Time: 8:30 a.m. Place: Room 101, State Education Building 201 East Colfax Avenue Denver, Colorado 80203 Pursuant to said hearing in the above-entitled matter at the time and place aforesaid, or at any adjourned meeting, the Commission will enter such orders as it deems appropriate to prevent the waste of oil and gas, either or both, in the operations of said field, and to carry out the purposes of the statute. Any interested party desiring to protest the granting of the application or to intervene should file with the Commission a written protest or a notice to intervene no later than September 11, 1990, briefly stating the basis of the protest or intervention. Such interested party shall, at the same time, serve a copy of the protest or notice to intervene to the person filing the application. A fee of forty-five dollars ($45.00) shall accompany each document filed with the Commission. IN THE NAME OF THE STATE OF COLORADO OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO �X By ilf. G R. Bic ne A& Dennis Dated at Suite 380 Applicant's Address: 1580 Logan Street J.W. Hawkins Denver, Colorado 80203 Amoco Production Company August 21, 1990 P.O. Box 800 Denver, CO 80201 7110C BEFORE THE OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO IN THE NATTER OF THE PROMULGATION ) CAUSE NO. 112 AND ESTABLISHMENT OF FIELD RULES ) DOCKET NO. 9-5 TO GOVERN OPERATIONS IN THE IGNACIO ) BLANCO FIELD, LA PLATA COUNTY ) COLORADO ) NOTICE OF HEARING TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES AND TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: On June 17, 1988, the Commission issued Order No. 112-60 which established 320-acre drilling and spacing units for the production of methane gas from the Fruitland coal seams underlying certain lands in the Ignacio Blanco Field including Section 6, Township 33 North, Range 9 West, N.M.P.M. , with the units to consist of the E1/2 and W1/2 or the N1/2 and S1/2 of a governmental section with the permitted well to be located in the NE1/4 and SW1/4 of each unit. On August 3, 1990, Amoco Production Company, filed with the Commission a verified application for an order pooling all the interests in the drilling and spacing unit consisting of the N1/2 of Section 6, Township 33 North, Range 9 West, N.M.P.M. for the development and operation of the Fruitland coal seams underlying said unit and the production of gas of said formation, pursuant to the provisions of 34-60-116, C.R.S. , 1973, as amended. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the Oil and Gas Conservation Commission of the State of Colorado, pursuant to the above, has scheduled the above-entitled matter for hearing on: Date: Monday, September 17, 1990 Tuesday, September 18, 1990 Time: 8:30 a.m. Place: Room 101, State Education Building 201 East Colfax Avenue Denver, Colorado 80203 Pursuant to said hearing in the above-entitled matter at the time and place aforesaid, or at any adjourned meeting, the Commission will enter such orders as it deems appropriate to prevent the waste of oil and gas, either or both, in the operations of said field, and to carry out the purposes of the statute. Any interested party desiring to protest the granting of the application or to intervene should file with the Commission a written protest or a notice to intervene no later than September 11, 1990, briefly stating the basis of the protest or intervention. Such interested party shall, at the same time, serve a copy of the protest or notice to intervene to the person filing the application. A fee of forty-five dollars ($45.00) shall accompany each document filed with the Commission. IN THE NAME OF THE STATE OF COLORADO OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION xx OF THE STATE OF COLORADO • �?/ By DennisR. BTc� kneliMeeetary Dated at Suite 380 Applicant's Address: 1580 Logan Street J.w. Hawkins Denver, Colorado 80203 Amoco Production Company August 21, 1990 P.O. Box 800 Deriver, CO 80201 7111C BEFORE THE OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO IN THE MATTER OF THE PROMULGATION ) CAUSE NO. 133 AND ESTABLISHMENT OF FIELD RULES TO) DOCKET NO. 9-11 GOVERN OPERATIONS IN THE HIAWATHA ) WEST FIELD, MOFFAT COUNTY, COLORADO) NOTICE OF HEARING TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES AND TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: On June 23, 1959, the Commission issued Order No. 133-1 which established 320-acre drilling and spacing units for the production of gas from the Wasatch, the Fort Union-Lance-Lewis, and the Mesaverde pools underlying certain lands in Moffat County, that the permitted gas wells be located not less than 660 feet from the boundary line of any gas drilling unit, and that no more than one gas well on each drilling unit be permitted to produce from any one of the three pools listed above, and approving the multiple completion of Wasatch pool gas production, and approved the commingling of gas production from the Fort Union-Lance-Lewis pool and the Mesaverde pool, including Sections 17 and 20, Township 12 North, Range 100 West, 6th P.M. On August 7, 1990, Texaco USA, by its attorney filed with the Commission a verified application for an order allowing a second well to produce gas for the drilling and spacing unit consisting of the Swl/4 o£ said Section 17 and the Nwl/4 of said Section 20, with a well Duncan Unit #2 Well #1 located in the SW1/4 NW1/4 of said Section 20 being the well producing for the unit, and with a well Duncan A-3, located in the Sw1/4 NW1/4 of said Section 20 currently shut-in. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the Oil and Gas Conservation Commission of the State of Colorado, pursuant to the above, has scheduled the above-entitled matter for hearing on: Date: Monday, September 17, 1990 Tuesday, September 18, 1990 Time: 8:30 a.m. Place: Room 101, State Education Building 201 East Colfax Avenue Denver, Colorado 80203 Pursuant to said hearing in the above-entitled matter at the time and place aforesaid, or at any adjourned meeting, the Commission will enter such orders as it deems appropriate to prevent the waste of oil and gas, either or both, in the operations of said field, and to carry out the purposes of the statute. Any interested party desiring to protest the granting of the application or to intervene should file with the Commission a written protest or a notice to intervene no later than September 11, 1990, briefly stating the basis of the protest or intervention. Such interested party shall, at the same time, serve a copy of the protest or notice to intervene to the person filing the application. A fee of forty-five dollars ($45 .00) shall accompany each document filed with the Commission. IN THE NAME OF THE STATE OF COLORADO OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION li ft OF THE sTATE OF COLORADO / By l�l ft {,JJ /C �l�l/ Denn s R. B]c ell, Secretary Applicants Address Dated at Suite 380 J.K. Hamby 1580 Logan Street Texaco, USA Denver, Colorado 80203 PO Box 46510 August 21, 1990 Denver, CO 80201-6510 0565I BEFORE THE OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO IN THE MATTER OF THE PROMULGATION ) CAUSE NO. 112 AND ESTABLISHMENT OF FIELD RULES ) DOCKET NO. 9-6 TO GOVERN OPERATIONS IN THE IGNACIO ) BLANCO FIELD, LA PLATA COUNTY ) COLORADO ) NOTICE OF HEARING TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES AND TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: On June 17, 1988, the Commission issued Order No. 112-60 which established 320-acre drilling and spacing units for the production of methane gas from the Fruitland coal seams underlying certain lands in the Ignacio Blanco Field including Section 18, Township 33 North, Range 9 west, N.M.P.M. , with the units to consist of the E1/2 and Wl/2 or the N1/2 and S1/2 of a governmental section with the permitted well to be located in the NE1/4 and SW1/4 of each unit. On August 3, 1990, Amoco Production Company, filed with the Commission a verified application for an order pooling all the interests in the drilling and spacing unit consisting of the S1/2 of Section 18, Township 33 North, Range 9 West, N.M.P.M. for the development and operation of the Fruitland coal seams underlying said unit and the production of gas of said formation, pursuant to the provisions of 34-60-116, C.R.S. , 1973, as amended. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the Oil and Gas Conservation Commission o£ the State of Colorado, pursuant to the above, has scheduled the above-entitled matter for hearing on: Date: Monday, September 17, 1990 Tuesday, September 18, 1990 Time: 8:30 a.m. Place: Room 101, State Education Building 201 East Colfax Avenue Denver, Colorado 80203 Pursuant to said hearing in the above-entitled matter at the time and place aforesaid, or at any adjourned meeting, the Commission will enter such orders as it deems appropriate to prevent the waste of oil and gas, either or both, in the operations of said field, and to carry out the purposes of the statute. Any interested party desiring to protest the granting of the application or to intervene should file with the Commission a written protest or a notice to intervene no later than September 11, 1990, briefly stating the basis of the protest or intervention. Such interested party shall, at the same time, serve a copy of the protest or notice to intervene to the person filing the application. A fee of forty-five dollars ($45.00) shall accompany each document filed with the Commission. IN THE NAME OF THE STATE OF COLORADO OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO By X-e4r71o/ Dennis R. B*Ana , Secretary Dated at Suite 380 Applicant's Address: 1580 Logan Street J.W. Hawkins Denver, Colorado 80203 Amoco Production Company August 21, 1990 P.O. Box 800 Denver, CO 80201 7112C BEFORE THE OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO IN THE MATTER OF THE PROMULGATION ) CAUSE NO. 112 AND ESTABLISHMENT OF FIELD RULES ) DOCKET NO. 9-7 TO GOVERN OPERATIONS IN THE IGNACIO ) BLANCO FIELD, LA PLATA COUNTY ) COLORADO ) NOTICE OF HEARING TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES AND TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: On June 17, 1988, the Commission issued Order No. 112-60 which established 320-acre drilling and spacing units for the production of methane gas from the Fruitland coal seams underlying certain lands in the Ignacio Blanco Field including Section 31, Township 33 North, Range 9 West, N.M.P.M. , with the units to consist of the E1/2 and W1/2 or the N1/2 and S1/2 of a governmental section with the permitted well to be located in the NE1/4 and SW1/4 of each unit. On August 3, 1990, Amoco Production Company, filed with the Commission a verified application for an order pooling all the interests in the drilling and spacing unit consisting of the N1/2 of Section 31, Township 33 North, Range 9 West, N.M.P.M. for the development and operation of the Fruitland coal seams underlying said unit and the production of gas of said formation, pursuant to the provisions of 34-60-116, C.R.S. , 1973, as amended. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the Oil and Gas Conservation Commission of the State of Colorado, pursuant to the above, has scheduled the above-entitled matter for hearing on: Date: Monday, September 17, 1990 Tuesday, September 18, 1990 Time: 8:30 a.m. Place: Room 101, State Education Building 201 East Colfax Avenue Denver, Colorado 80203 Pursuant to said hearing in the above-entitled matter at the time and place aforesaid, or at any adjourned meeting, the Commission will enter such orders as it deems appropriate to prevent the waste of oil and gas, either or both, in the operations of said field, and to carry out the purposes of the statute. Any interested party desiring to protest the granting of the application or to intervene should file with the Commission a written protest or a notice to intervene no later than September 11, 1990, briefly stating the basis of the protest or intervention. Such interested party shall, at the same time, serve a copy of the protest or notice to intervene to the person filing the application. A fee of forty-five dollars ($45.00) shall accompany each document filed with the Commission. IN THE NAME OF THE STATE OF COLORADO OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO Y All4 ! ," dei Dennis R. BiCkr1 , Secretary Dated at Suite 380 Applicant's Address: 1580 Logan Street J.W. Hawkins Denver, Colorado 80203 Amoco Production Company August 21, 1990 P.O. Box 800 Denver, CO 80201 7113C BEFORE THE OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO IN THE MATTER OF THE PROMULGATION ) CAUSE N0. 112 AND ESTABLISHMENT OF FIELD RULES ) DOCKET N0. 9-8 TO GOVERN OPERATIONS IN THE IGNACIO ) BLANCO FIELD, LA PLATA COUNTY ) COLORADO ) NOTICE OF HEARING TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES AND TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: On June 17, 1988, the Commission issued Order No. 112-60 which established 320-acre drilling and spacing units for the production of methane gas from the Fruitland coal seams underlying certain lands in the Ignacio Blanco Field including Section 14, Township 33 North, Range 10 West, N.M.P.M. , with the units to consist of the E1/2 and W1/2 Or the N1/2 and S1/2 of a governmental section with the permitted well to be located in the NE1/4 and SW1/4 of each unit. On August 3, 1990, Amoco Production Company, filed with the Commission a verified application for an order pooling all the interests in the drilling and spacing unit consisting of the E1/2 of Section 14, Township 33 North, Range 10 West, N.M.P.M, for the development and operation of the Fruitland coal seams underlying said unit and the production of gas of said formation, pursuant to the provisions of 34-60-116, C.R.S. , 1973, as amended. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the Oil and Gas Conservation Commission of the State of Colorado, pursuant to the above, has scheduled the above-entitled matter for hearing on: Date: Monday, September 17, 1990 Tuesday, September 18, 1990 Time: 8:30 a.m. Place: Room 101, State Education Building 201 East Colfax Avenue Denver, Colorado 80203 Pursuant to said hearing in the above-entitled matter at the time and place aforesaid, or at any adjourned meeting, the Commission will enter such orders aS it deems appropriate to prevent the waste of oil and gas, either or both, in the operations of said field, and to carry out the purposes of the statute. Any interested party desiring to protest the granting of the application or to intervene should file with the Commission a written protest or a notice to intervene no later than September 11, 1990, briefly stating the basis of the protest or intervention. Such interested party shall, at the same time, serve a copy of the protest or notice to intervene to the person filing the application. A fee of forty-five dollars ($45.00) shall accompany each document filed with the Commission. IN THE NAME OF THE STATE OF COLORADO OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO By Denn.1s R.1 B c nell,erazikal i Secretary Dated at Suite 380 Applicant's Address: 1580 Logan Street J.W. Hawkins Denver, Colorado 80203 Amoco Production Company August 21, 1990 P.O. Box 800 Denver, CO 80201 7114C r BEFORE THE OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO IN THE MATTER OF THE PROMULGATION ) CAUSE NO. 112 AND ESTABLISHMENT OF FIELD RULES ) DOCKET NO. 9-9 TO GOVERN OPERATIONS IN THE IGNACIO ) BLANCO FIELD, LA PLATA COUNTY ) COLORADO ) NOTICE OF HEARING TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES AND TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: On June 17, 1988, the Commission issued Order No. 112-60 which established 320-acre drilling and spacing units for the production of methane gas from the Fruitland coal seams underlying certain lands in the Ignacio Blanco Field including Section 12, Township 32 North, Range 10 West, N.M.P.M. , with the units to consist of the E1/2 and W1/2 or the N1/2 and S1/2 of a governmental section with the permitted well to be located in the NE1/4 and SW1/4 of each unit. On August 3, 1990, Amoco Production Company, filed with the Commission a verified application for an order pooling all the interests in the drilling and spacing unit consisting o£ the E1/2 of Section 12, Township 32 North, Range 10 West, N.M.P.M. for the development and operation of the Fruitland coal teams underlying said unit and the production o£ gas of said formation, pursuant to the provisions of 34-60-116, C.R.S. , 1973, as amended. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the Oil and Gas Conservation Commission of the State of Colorado, pursuant to the above, has scheduled the above-entitled matter for hearing on: Date: Monday, September 17, 1990 Tuesday, September 18, 1990 Time: 8:30 a.m. Place: Room 101, State Education Building 201 East Colfax Avenue Denver, Colorado 80203 Pursuant to said hearing in the above-entitled matter at the time and place aforesaid, or at any adjourned meeting, the Commission will enter such orders as it deems appropriate to prevent the waste o£ oil and gas, either or both, in the operations of said field, and to carry out the purposes of the statute. Any interested party desiring to protest the granting of the application or to intervene should file with the Commission a written protest or a notice to intervene no later than September 11, 1990, briefly stating the basis of the protest or intervention. Such interested party shall, at the same time, serve a copy of the protest or notice to intervene to the person filing the application. A fee of forty-five dollars ($45.00) shall accompany each document filed with the Commission. IN THE NAME OF THE STATE OF COLORADO OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO • By 1 Dennts�R 1Bdall, S�ary Dated at Suite 380 Applicant's Address: 1580 Logan Street J.W. Hawkins Denver, Colorado 80203 Amoco Production Company August 21, 1990 P.O. Box 800 Denver, CO 80201 7115C BEFORE THE ,OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION„COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO IN THE MATTER OF THE PROMULGATION AND ) CAUSE NO. 103 ESTABLISHMENT OF FIELD RULES TO GOVERN ) OPERATIONS IN THE BUCK PEAK FIELD, ) Docket No. 9-10 MOFFAT COUNTY, COLORADO ) NONCE OF HEARING TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES AND TO WHOM IT MAX CONCERN: On April 8, 1957, the Commission issued Order No. 103-1 which established 80-acre drilling and spacing units for the production o£ oil from the Tow Creek Zone of the Mancos formation with each such unit to consist of the E1/2 or the W1/2 of a quarter section with the permitted well to be located in the NW1/4 and the SE1/4 of each quarter section and located not closer than 330 feet from the boundary line of such quarter-quarter section. The order further established 320-acre drilling and spacing units for the production of gas from the Morapas Sand of the Mancos formation and the Mesaverde formation with each such unit to consist of the E1/2 and the W1/2 of each section with the permitted well to be located in the SE1/4 and the NW1/4 of each section and located not closer , than 660 feet from the boundary line of such quarter section. The Commission found that upon its own motion or upon petition of any interested party, that it reserved the right to reconsider this matter when further geological and engineering data becomes available. The below listed lands describe the Buck Peak Field, Moffat County, Colorado: Township 6 North, Range 90 West, 6th P.M. Section 22: X-1.1 Section 27: All Section 23 : All Section 34 : All Section 24 : All Section 35: All Section 25 : All Section 36: All Section 26 : All On August 3, 1990, Meridian Oil Inc, by its attorney, filed with the Commission a verified application for a hearing to clarify the the designation of the common source of supply identified as the Tow Creek Zone of the Mancos formation and to designate that common source of supply as the Calcareous Zone of the Mancos Formation, also know as the Tow Creek Zone of the Mancos Formation, Buck Peak Zone of the Mancos Formation, and Niobrara Formation, and to define those formations and horizons as the Niobrara formation as encountered in the Malco Petroleum Kowach No. 1 Well located in the NW1/4 Nw1/4 of Section 25 between the depth of 100 feet above 6,350 feet and 100 feet below the depth of 7,750 feet. The applicant further requests that an order be issued establishing all the said Section 23 as a drilling and spacing unit for the horizontal wells to be drilled to the Niobrara formation, to permit the drilling of one or two wells at the discretion of the applicant in the above spacing unit, to allow the horizontal leg within the Niobrara formation to be no closer than 600 feet from the boundary line of the section, and that the horizontal leg of any well within the Niobrara formation shall be no closer than 1200 feet from any other well producing from the same source of supply on adjacent or cornering lands. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the Oil and Gas Conservation Commission of the State of Colorado, pursuant to the above, has scheduled the above-entitled matter for hearing on: Date: Monday, September 17, 1990 Tuesday, September 18, 1990 Time: 8:30 a.m. Place: Room 101, State Education Building 201 East Colfax Avenue Denver, Colorado 80203 Pursuant to said hearing in the above-entitled matter at the time and place aforesaid, or"at any, adjourned meeting, the Commission will enter such orders as it deems appropriate to prevent the waste o£ oil and gas, either or both, in the operations of said field, and to carry out the purposes of the statute. Any interested party desiring to protest the granting of the application or to intervene should file with the Commission a written protest or a notice to intervene no later than September 11, 1990, briefly stating the basis of the protest or intervention. Such interested party shall, at the same time, serve a copy of the protest or notice to intervene to the person filing the application. A fee of forty-five dollars ($45.00) shall accompany each document filed with the Commission. IN THE NAME OF THE STATE OF COLORADO OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO By 21tAnenmli /t1 Dennis R. Bic ne , Secretary Dated at Suite 380 Attorney for applicant: 1580 Logan Street Carlton L. Eckberg Denver, Colorado 80203 Poulson, Odell b Peterson August 21 1990 1775 Sherman St. , Suite 1400 Denver, CO 80203 0564I - 2 - (103 doc 9-10) BEFORE THE OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO IN THE MATTER OF THE PROMULGATION ) CAUSE NO. 133 AND ESTABLISHMENT OF FIELD RULES TO) DOCKET NO. 9-12 GOVERN OPERATIONS IN THE HIAWATHA ) WEST FIELD, MOFFAT COUNTY, COLORADO) NOTICE OF HEARING TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES AND TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: On June 23, 1959, the Commission issued Order No. 133-1 which established 320-acre drilling and spacing units for the production of gas from the Wasatch, the Fort Union-Lance-Lewis, and the Mesaverde pools underlying certain lands in Moffat County, that the permitted gas wells be located not less than 660 feet from the boundary line of any gas drilling unit, and that no more than one gas well on each drilling unit be permitted to produce from any one of the three pools listed above, and approving the multiple completion of Wasatch pool gas production, and approved the commingling of gas production from the Fort Union-Lance-Lewis pool and the Mesaverde pool, including Sections 24, Township 12 North, Range 101 West, 6th P.M. On August 7, 1990, Texaco USA, by its attorney filed with the Commission a verified application for an order allowing a second well to produce gas for the drilling and spacing unit consisting of the S1/2 of said Section 24, with a well Van Schaick Unit #1 Well #1 located in the NW1/4 SE1/4 0£ said Section 24 being the well producing for the unit from the Wasatch and Fort Union Pools, and with a well Van Schaick 3-3, located in the SW1/4 SW1/4 of said Section 24 which has been completed in the Fort Union-Lance-Lewis formations and is currently shut-in. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the Oil and Gas Conservation Commission o£ the State of Colorado, pursuant to the above, has scheduled the above-entitled matter for hearing on: Date: Monday, September 17, 1990 Tuesday, September 18, 1990 Time: 8 :30 a.m. Place: Room 101, State Education Building 201 East Colfax Avenue Denver, Colorado 80203 Pursuant to said hearing in the above-entitled matter at the time and place aforesaid, or at any adjourned meeting, the Commission will enter such orders as it deems appropriate to prevent the waste o£ oil and gas, either or both, in the operations of said field, and to carry out the purposes of the statute. Any interested party desiring to protest the granting of the application or to intervene should file with the Commission a written protest or a notice to intervene no later than September 11, 1990, briefly stating the basis of the protest or intervention. such interested party shall, at the same time, serve a copy of the protest or notice to intervene to the person filing the application. A fee of forty-five dollars ($45.00 ) shall accompany each document filed with the Commission. IN THE NAME OF THE STATE OF COLORADO OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION AY �O�F. THE STATE OF COLORADO By Dennis�RJ dhnec , Secretary Applicant's Address Dated at Suite 380 J.K. Hamby 1580 Logan Street Texaco, USA Denver, Colorado 80203 PO Box 46510 August 21, 1990 Denver, CO 80201-6510 05661 STATE OF COLORADO OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES SUITE 380 LOGAN TOWER BUILDING WILLIAM R. SMITH 1580 LOGAN STREET Director DENVER, COLORADO 80203 DENNIS R. BICKNELL ROY ROMER Deputy Director (303) 894.2100 Governor August 1990 The Commission wishes to announce that the OIL AND GAS STATISTICS, 1989 volume is available for purchase. The production information contained in the volume includes corrections made to reported production for the year 1939 as recently as July 1, 1990 . In addition to the historical production data, it should be realized there is other information included, such as: SECTION I Commission Activities SECTION Drilling Statistics - 1989 SECTION III New Field Discoveries - 1989 SECTION IV Computer Codes SECTION V 1989 Oil and Gas Production A. Colorado Production Summary - historical B. Oil and Gas Production by County C. Annual ?roduction by Leases D. Oil Production by Operator E. Bas Sales by Operator SECTION V_ Injected Fluids A. Alphabetical Listing of Disposal ;dells B. Location Listing of Disposal wells C. Injection Volumes of Disposal wells - Sorted by Facility Number D. Enhanced Recovery Projects - Cumulative Volume Summary E. Injected Volumes of Enhanced Recovery Projects - Sorted Alphabetically SECTION VII Gas Storage Projects SECTION VIII Plant Intake and Product Volumes The price per book for those purchased and picked up at the Commission Office is $12 . 00 . For those wishing to have the Commission mail the book to you the price is $14 . 00 . We still have many prior year Statistic Books available for sale. We are sold out of 1985 and 1987 . Please call for volumes available and their prices . There have been no revisions made to the Rules and Regulations book as of 7/89 . If you wish a copy of the Rules and Regulations the price is $3.00 to be picked up in our office, and $3 .90 if you wish us to mail one to you . 7 ♦.1 Y 1 S `ERR RE �•� \ .C.J gs umnottarti -. 1)1 l 3 g NUCLEAR REGULATO13,Y c vIAA1S$ION f WAsmiNGTON:DY'c.irss F ,. , o y i`.'�'� '• AUG 2 2 1990 Docket No. 72-9 (50-267) Public Service Company of Colorado ATTN: A. Clegg Crawford Vice President Nuclear Operations P. 0. Box 840 Denver, Colorado 80201-0840 Gentlemen: The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has received and docketed the Fort St. Vrain Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation License Application, dated June 22, 1990. Enclosed for your information is a copy of the "Notice of Consideration of Issuance of a Materials License for the Storage of Spent Fuel, and Notice of Opportunity for Hearing" related to your request for the Fort St. Vrain site. The license would allow the storage of spent fuel in modular vault dry storage at an independent spent fuel storage installation at the Fort St. Vrain site. The notice has been forwarded to the Office of the Federal Register fc- publication. Sincerely, Charles J. Haug ney, Chi Fuel Cycle Safety Branch Division of Industrial and Medical Nuclear Safety Enclosure: Federal Register Notice cc: Attached list dt),\5\C\ Mr. A. Clegg Crawford Docket No. 50-267 Public Service Company of Colorado Fort St. Vrain cc: Mr. D. W. Warembourg, Manager Regional Representative Nuclear Engineering Division Radiation Programs Public Service Company Environmental Protection Agency of Colorado 1 Denver Place P. O. Box 840 999 18th Street. Suite 1300 Denver, Colorado 80201-0840 Denver. Colorado 80202-2413 Mr. David Alberstein, Manager Robert M. Quillen, Director Fort St. Vrain Services Radiation Control Division GA International Services Corporation Department of Health P. O. Box 85608 4210 East 11th Avenue San Diego, California 92138 Denver, Colorado 80220 Mr. H. L. Brey, Manager Mr. Charles H. Fuller Nuclear Licensing and Resource Nuclear Production and Management Division Station Manager Public Service Company Of Colorado Public Service Company of Colorado P. O. Box 840 16805 Weld County Road 19-1/2 Denver. Colorado 80201-0840 Platteville, Colorado 80651 Senior Resident Inspector Mr. P. F. Tomlinson. Manager U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Quality Assurance Division P. O. Box 640 Public Service Company of Colorado Platteville, Colorado 80651 16805 Weld County Road 19-1/2 Platteville, Colorado 80651 Kelley, Stansfield & O'Donnell ATTN: Mr. J. K. Tarpey Mr. D. D. Hock Public Service Company Building President and Chief Executive Officer Room 900 Public Service Company of Colorado 550 15th Street P. O. Box 840 Denver, Colorado 80202 Denver, Colorado 80201-0840 Regional Administrator. Region IV Commitment Control Program U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Coordinator 611 Ryan Plaza Drive. Suite 1000 Public Service Company of Colorado Arlington, Texas 76011 2420 W. 26th Avenue. Suite 100-D • Denver, Colorado 80211 Chairman. Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado Greeley. Colorado 80631 7590-01 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION DOCKET NOS. 72-9, 50-267 PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO NOTICE OF CONSIDERATION OF ISSUANCE OF A MATERIALS LICENSE FOR THE STORAGE OF SPENT FUEL AND NOTICE OF OPPORTUNITY FOR A HEARING The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) is considering an application dated June 22, 1990, for a materials license, under the provisions of 10 CFR Part 72, from Public Service Company of Colorado (the applicant or PSC) to possess spent fuel and other radioactive materials associated with spent fuel storage in an independent spent fuel storage installation (ISFSI) located in Weld County, Colorado. If granted, the license will authorize the applicant to store spent fuel in modular vault dry storage at an ISFSI at the applicant's Fort St. Vrain site (Operating License DPR-34). Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR Part 72. the term of the license for the ISFSI would be twenty (20) years. Prior to issuance of the requested license. the Commission will have made the findings required by the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commission's rules and regulations. The issuance of the materials license will not be approved until the Commission has reviewed the proposal and has concluded that approval of the license will not be inimical to the common defense and security and will not constitute an unreasonable risk to the health and safety of the public. The NRC will complete an environmental evaluation, in accordance with 10 CFR Part 51, to determine if the preparation of an environmental impact statement is warranted or if an environmental assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact are appropriate. This action will be the subject of a subsequent notice in the FEDERAL REGISTER. 2 Pursuant to 10 CFR 2.105 and 2.1107. by SEP 2 8 ' 1990, the licensee may file a request for a hearing; and any person whose interest may be affected by this proceeding and who wishes to participate as a party in the proceeding must file a written request for a hearing and a petition for leave to intervene with respect to the subject materials license in accordance with the provisions of 10 CFR 2.714. If a request for hearing or petition for leave to intervene is filed by the above date. the Commission or an Atomic Safety and Licensing Board designated by the Commission or by the Chairman of the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel will rule on the request and/or petition, and the Secretary or the designated Atomic Safety and Licensing Board will issue a notice of hearing or an appropriate order. In the event that no request for hearing or petition for leave to intervene is filed by the above date, the Commission may, upon satisfactory completion of all evaluations, issue the materials license without further prior notice. A petition for leave to intervene shall set forth with particularity the interest of the petitioner in the proceeding and how that interest may be affected by the results of the proceeding. The petition should specifically explain the reasons why intervention should be permitted with particular reference to the following factors: (1) the nature of the petitioner's right under the Act to be made a party to the proceeding; (2) the nature and extent of the petitioner's property, financial, or other interest in the proceeding; and (3) the possible effect of any order that may be entered in the proceeding on the petitioner's interest. The petition should also identify the specific aspect(s) of the subject matter of the proceeding as to which petitioner wishes to intervene. Any person who has filed a petition for leave to intervene or who has been admitted as a party may amend a petition, without requesting leave of the Board up to 15 days prior to the holding of the first prehearing conference scheduled in the proceeding, but such an amended petition must satisfy the specificity requirements described above. Not later than fifteen (15) days prior to the first prehearing conference scheduled in the proceeding, a petitioner shall file a supplement to the petition to intervene which must include a list of contentions which are sought to be litigated in the matter. Each contention must consist of a specific statement of the issue of law or fact to be raised or controverted. In 3 addition, the petitioner shall provide a brief explanation, of the bases of the contention and a concise statement of the alleged facts or expert opinion which support the contention and on which the petitioner intends to rely in proving the contention at the hearing. The petitioner must also provide references to those specific sources and documents of which the petitioner is aware and on which the petitioner intends to rely to establish those facts or expert opinion. The petitioner must provide sufficient information to show that a genuine dispute exists with the applicant on a material issue of taw or fact. Contentions shall be limited to matters within the scope of the action under consideration. The contention must be one which, if proven, would entitle the petitioner to relief. A petitioner who fails to file such a supplement which satisfied these requirements with respect to at least one contention will not be permitted to participate as a party. Those permitted to intervene become parties to the proceeding, subject to any limitations in the order granting leave to intervene, and have the opportunity to participate fully in the conduct of the hearing. A request for a hearing or a petition for leave to intervene must be filed with.the Secretary of the Commission, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Washington. D.C. 20555, Attention: Docketing and Service Branch, or may be delivered to the Commission's Public Document Room. the Gelman Building, 2120 L Street, NW., Washington, D.C., by the above date. Where petitions are filed during the last ten (10) days of the notice period, it is requested that the petitioner promptly so inform the Commission by a toll-free telephone call to Western Union at 1-(800) 325-6000 (in Missouri 1-(800) 342-6700). The Western Union operator should be given Datagram Identification Number 3737 and the following message addressed to Richard E. Cunningham. Director, Division of Industrial and Medical Nuclear Safety, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards: Petitioner's name and telephone number; date petition was mailed; plant name; and publication date and page number of this FEDERAL REGISTER notice. A copy of the petition should also be sent to the Office of the General Counsel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555, and to James K. Tarpey, Esq. , Kelly, Stansfield and O'Donnell, 900 Public Service Company Building, 550 15th Street, Denver, Colorado 80202, attorney for the applicant. 4 Nontimely filings of petitions for leave to intervene, amended petitions. supplemental petitions and/or requests for hearing will not be entertained absent a determination by the Commission, the presiding officer or the presiding Atomic Safety and Licensing Board that the petition and/or request should be granted based upon a balancing of the factors specified in 10 CFR 2.714(a)(1)(i)-(v) and 2.714(d). The Commission hereby provides notice that this proceeding concerns an application for a license falling within the scope of section 134 of the Nuclear waste Policy Act of 1982 (NWPA), 42 U.S.C. § 10154. Under section 134 of NWPA, the Commission, at the request of any petitioner or any party to the proceeding, must use hybrid hearing procedures with respect to "any matter which the Commission determines to be in controversy among the parties.' The hybrid procedures in section 134 provide for oral argument on matters in controversy, preceded by discovery under the Commission's rules, and the designation, following argument, of only those factual issues that involve a genuine and substantial dispute. together with any remaining questions of law, to be resolved in an adjudicatory hearing. Actual adjudicatory hearings are to be held on only those issues found to meet the criteria of section 134 and set for hearing after oral argument. The Commission's rules implementing section 134 of the NWPA are found in 10 CFR Part 2, subpart K. "Hybrid Hearing Procedures for Expansion of Spent Nuclear Fuel Storage Capacity at Civilian Nuclear Power Reactors," (published at 50 FR 41662, October 15, 1985). Under those rules, any party to the proceeding may invoke the hybrid hearing procedures by filing with the presiding officer a written request for oral argument under 10 CFR 2.1109. To be timely, the request must be filed within ten (10) days of an order granting a request for hearing or petition to intervene. (As outlined above, the Commission's rules in 10 CFR Part 2, subpart 6, and § 2.714 in particular. continue to govern the filing of requests for a hearing or petitions to intervene, as well as the admission of contentions. ) The presiding officer may grant an untimely request for oral argument only upon a showing of good cause by the requesting party for the failure to file on time and after providing the other parties an opportunity to respond to the untimely request. If the presiding _1 5 officer grants a request for oral argument, any hearing held on the application shall be conducted in accordance with the hybrid hearing procedures. In essence, those procedures limit the time available for discovery and require that an oral argument be held to determine whether any contentions must be resolved in an adjudicatory hearing. If no party to the proceeding requests oral argument, or if all untimely requests for oral argument are denied, then the usual procedures in 10 CFR Part 2, subpart G apply. For further details with respect to this action, see the application dated June 22, 1990, which is available for public inspection at the Commission's Public Document Room, the Gelman Building, 2120 L Street, NW., Washington, DC. 20555, and at the' local public document room at the Greeley Public Library, City Complex Building, Greeley, Colorado, 80631. The Commission's license and Safety Evaluation Report, when issued, may be inspessied at the above locations. Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 22 ay of August 1990. FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Ca" Charles J. H hney, Ch Fuel Cycle Sa ety Division of Industrial and Medical Nuclear Safety Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards °♦EPP PF0V4. - �- � UNITED STATES C • f NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 0 • �. . i REGION IV �iy' `V„..� MO�4 811 RYAN PLAZA DRIVE.SURE 1000 j � PI_^• 1 ?�• v 17 ARLINGTON,TEXAS 78011 AUG 2 8 1993 • TTHE BOARDn•\ TO . „CA?D In Reply Refer To: Docket: 50-267 Public Service Company of Colorado ATTN: A. Clegg Crawford, Vice President Nuclear Operations P.O. Box 840 Denver, Colorado 80201-0840 Gentlemen: SUBJECT: REVIEW OF FORT ST. VRAIN QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION We have reviewed the changes of the Quality Assurance (QA) program description for Fort St. Vrain submitted by your letter P-90178 dated June 22, 1990, We find that Appendix 6 of the Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR) Continues to meet the requirements of 10 CFR 50, Appendix 6 and therefore, the changes are acceptable. If there are changes to OA commitments existing in docketed correspondence outside of the USAR QA program description, you are obligated to notify this office. Any questions you may have concerninc this reviewed should be directed to tor. Ian Barnes cf our staff on (817) 260-8176. Sincerely, AieslAWCo ins, irector Division of Reactor Projects cc: Public Service Company of Colorado ATTN: D. W. Warembourg, Manager Nuclear Engineering Division P.O. Box 840 Denver, Colorado 80201-0840 GA International Services Corporation Fort St. Vrain Services ATTN: David Alberstein, Manager P.O. Box 85608 San Diego, California 92138 Public Service Company of Colorado -2- Public Service Company of Colorado ATTN: Charles H. Fuller, Manager Nuclear Production and Station Manager 16805 Weld County Road 19-1/2 Platteville, Colorado 80651 Public Service Company of Colorado ATTN: H. L. Brey, Manager, Nuclear Licensing and Resource Management Division P.O. Box 840 Denver, Colorado 80201-0840 Public Service Company of Colorado ATTN: P. F. Tomlinson, Manager Cuality Assurance Division 16805 Weld County Road 19-1/2 Platteville, Colorado 80651 Public Service Company of Colorado ATTN: D. D. Hock, President and Chief Executive Officer P.O. Box 840 Denver, Colorado 80201-0840 Public Service Company of Colorado ATTN: Commitment Control Program Coordinator 2420 W. 26th Ave. Suite 100-D Denver, Colorado 80211 Kelley, Standfield & O'Donnell ATTN: Mr. J. K. Tarpey Public Service Company Building Room 900 550 15th Street Denver, Colorado 80202 Chairman Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado Greeley, Colorado 80631 Regional Representative Radiation Programs Environmental Protection Agency 1 Denver Place 999 18th Street, Suite 1300 Cenver, Colorado 80202-2413 • Public Service Company of Colorado -3- Department of Health ATTN: Robert M. Quillen, Director Radiation Control Division 4210 East 11th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80220 Colorado Public Utilities Commission ATTN: Ralph Teague, P.E. 1580 Logan Street 0L1 Denver, Colorado 80203 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Senior Resident Inspector P.O. Box 640 Platteville, Colorado 80651 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Regional Administrator, Region IV 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 1000 Arlington, Texas 76011 J``EpM R(CU.S UNITED STATES ° _ ''1 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ,••— ‘, . • ` s REGION IV p °W .:°r ell RYAN PLAZA DRIVE.SUITE 1000 SEo —Li 1,:: v 22 r�H9 „o` ARLINGTON,TEXAS 76)71 _ CL-' 1990 ' AU6 2 8 0 In Reply Refer To: Docket: 50-267 Public Service Company of Colorado ATTN: A. Clegg Crawford, Vice President Nuclear Operations P.O. Box 840 Denver, Colorado 80201-0840 Gentlemen: SUBJECT: REVIEW OF FORT ST. VRAIN QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION We have reviewed the changes addressed in Revision 8 of the Quality Assurance (QA) program description for Fort St. 1lrain submitted by your letter P-90226 dated July 20, 1990. We find that Appendix B of the Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR) continues to meet the requirements of IC CFR 50, Appendix B and therefore, the changes are acceptable. If there are changes to QA commitments existing in docketed correspondence outside of the USAR QA program description, you are obligated to notify this office. Any questions you may have concerning this review should be directed to Mr. Ian Barnes of our staff on (817) 860-8176. Sincerely, AGot llivi-Director Division of Reactor Projects cc: Public Service Company of Colorado ATTN: D. W. Warembourg, Manager Nuclear Engineering Division F.O. Box 840 Denver, Colorado 80201-0840 GA International Services Corporation ' Fort St. Vrain Services ATTN: David Alberstein, Manager P.O. Box 85608 San Diego, California 92138 Public Service Company of Colorado -2- Public Service Company of Colorado ATTN: Charles H. Fuller, Manager Nuclear Production and Station Manager 16805 Weld County Road 19-1/2 Platteville, Colorado 80651 Public Service Company of Colorado ATTN: H. L. Brey, Manager, Nuclear Licensing and Resource Management Division P.O. Box 840 Denver, Colorado 80201-0840 Public Service Company of Colorado ATTN: P. F. Tomlinson, Manager Quality Assurance Division 16805 Weld County Road 19-1/2 Platteville, Colorado 80651 Public Service Company of Colorado ATTN: D. D. Hock, President and Chief Executive Officer P.O. Box 840 Denver, Colorado 80201-0840 Public Service Company of Colorado ATTN: Commitment Control Program Coordinator 2420 W. 26th Ave. Suite 100-D Denver, Colorado 80211 Kelley, Standfield & O'Donnell ATTN: Mr. J. K. Tarpey Public Service Company Building Room 900 550 15th Street Denver, Colorado 80202 Chairman Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado Greeley, Colorado 80631 Regional Representative Radiation Programs Environmental Protection Agency 1 Denver Place 999 18th Street, Suite 1300 Denver, Colorado 80202-2413 • Public Service Company of Colorado -3- Department of Health ATTN: Robert M. Quillen, Director Radiation Control Division 4210 East 11th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80220 Colorado Public Utilities Commission ATTN: Ralph Teague, P.E. 1580 Logan Street 0L1 Denver, Colorado 80203 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Senior Resident Inspector P.O. Box 640 Platteville, Colorado 80651 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Regional Administrator, Region IV 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 1000 Arlington, Texas 76011 tPM RE Oe Jc` 0 UNITED STATES WELD C'7.1.:•" 4 r' NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON,D.C.,20655 4 - 2g it Sr? LVI O + August 24, 1990 CLER1� Docket No. 50-267 Mr. A. Clegg Crawford Vice President, Nuclear Operations Public Service Company of Colorado P. O. Bcx 840 Denver, Colorado 80201-0840 Dear Mr. Crawford: SUBJECT: NOTICE OF CONSIDERATION OF ISSUANCE OF AMENDMENT AND OPPORTUNITY FOR HEARING A Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Amendment to Facility License and Opportunity for Hearing, with respect to your application of June 5, 1990, has been forwarded to the Office of Federal Register for publication. A copy of the Notice is enclosed for your information. Sincerely, V L9 2csAdna` Peter B. Erickson, Project Manager Non-Power Reactor. Decommissioning and Environmental Project Directorate Division of Reactor Projects - III, IV, V and Special Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Enclosure: As stated cc w/ enclosure See next page Mr. A. Clegg Crawford Docket No. 50-267 Public Service Company of Colorado Fort St. Vrain cc: Mr. D. W. Warembourg, Manager Regional Representative Nuclear Engineering Division Radiation Programs Public Service Company Environmental Protection Agency of Colorado 1 Denver Place P. O. Box 840 999 18th Street, Suite 1300 Denver, Colorado 80201-0840 Denver, Colorado 80202-2413 Mr. David Alberstein, Manager Robert M. Quillen, Director Fort St. Vrain Services Radiation Control Division GA International Services Corporation Department of Health P. O. Box 85608 4210 East 11th Avenue San Diego, California 92138 Denver, Colorado 80220 Mr. H. L. Brey, Manager Mr. Charles H. Fuller Nuclear Licensing and Resource Nuclear Production and Management Division Station Manager Public Service Company of Colorado Public Service Company'of Colorado P. O. Box 840 16805 Weld County Road 19-1/2 Denver, Colorado 80201-0840 Platteville, Colorado 80651 Senior Resident Inspector Mr. P. F. Tomlinson, Manager U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Quality Assurance Division P. 0. Box 640 Public Service Company of Colorado Platteville, Colorado 80651 16805 Weld County Road 19-1/2 Platteville, Colorado 80651 Kelley, Standfield & O'Donnell ATTN: Mr. J. K. Tarpey Mr. D. D. Nock Public Service Company Building President and Chief Executive Officer Room 900 Public Service Company of Colorado 550 15th Street P. O. Box 840 Denver, Colorado 80202 Denver, Colorado 80201-0840 Regional Administrator, Region IV Commitment Control Program U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Coordinator 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 1000 Public Service Company of Colorado Arlington, Texas 76011 2420 W. 26th Avenue, Suite 100-D Denver, Colorado 80211 Chairman, Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado Greeley, Colorado 80631 7590-01 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO DOCKET N0. 50-267 NOTICE OF CONSIDERATION OF ISSUANCE OF AMENDMENT TO FACILITY LICENSE AND OPPORTUNITY FOR NEARING The U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) is considering issuance of an amendment to Facility License No. DPR-34 issued to Public Service Company of Colorado (the licensee), for the Physical Security Plan of the Fort St. Vrain Nuclear Generating Station (FSV) located in Weld County, Colorado. The licensee submitted proposed amendments to the Physical Security Plan, Guard Force Training and Qualification Plan and the Safeguards Contingency Plan for FSV. The proposed amendments to these plans reflect a reduction in scope to cover only the storage of spent fuel. The basis for the changes is premised on FSV being permanently shutdown on August 18, 1989, and the licensee's letter dated November 21, 1989, as supplemented April 25, 1990. which requested that Facility License No. DPR 34 for FSV be amended to a possession-only status. On February 7, 1990, one-third of the fuel had been removed from the reactor and stored in the Fuel Element Storage Wells. Also. the Commission issued a Confirmatory Order dated May 7, 1990 (55 FR 18995) that modified License No. DPR-34 to prohibit taking the FSV reactor to criticality or operating FSV at any power level. Action on the possession-only application is still pending. The proposed amendments only eliminate areas, equipment, systems and procedures that have been deemed unnecessary for a nuclear power facility which has been permanently shutdown • i 2 _ and require the licensee to implement certain security measures commensurate with the risks associated with storage of spent fuel. Prior to issuance of the proposed license amendment, the Commission will have made findings required by the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, an amended (the Act) and the Commission's regulations. By October 1, 1990. the licensee may file a request for a hearing with respect to issuance of the amendment to the subject facility license and any person whose interest may be affected by this proceeding and who wishes to participate as a party in the proceeding must file a written petition for leave to intervene. Request for a hearing and petitions for leave to intervene shall be filed in accordance with the Commission's "Rules of Practice for Domestic Licensing Proceedings" in 10 CFR Part 2. Interested persons should consult a current copy of 10 CFR 2.714 which is available at the Commission's Public Document Room, the Gelman Building, 2120 L Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20555 and at the Local Public Document Room located at the Greeley Public Library, City Complex Building, Greeley, Colorado 80631. If a request for a hearing or petition for leave to intervene is filed by the above date, the Commission or an Atomic Safety and Licensing Board, designated by the Commission or by the Chairman of the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, will rule on the request and/or petition and the Secretary or the designated Atomic Safety and Licensing Board will issue a notice of hearing or an appropriate order. As required by 10 CFR 2.714. a petition for leave to intervene shall set forth with particularity the interest of the petitioner in the proceeding, and how that interest mqy be affected by the results of the proceeding. The petition should specifically explain the reasons why intervention should be permitted with particular reference to the following factors: (1) the nature of the petitioner's right under the Act to be made party to the proceeding; a ' - 3 - • (2) the nature and extent of the petitioner's property, financial, or other interest in the proceeding; and (3) the possible effect of any order which may be entered in the proceeding on the petitioner's interest. The petition should also identify the specific aspect(s) of the subject matter of the proceeding as to which petitioner wishes to intervene. Any person who has filed a petition for leave to intervene or who has been admitted as a party may amend the petition without requesting leave of the Board up to fifteen (15) days prior to the first prehearing conference scheduled in the proceeding, but such an amended petition must satisfy the specificity requirements described above. Not later than fifteen (15) days prior to the first prehearing:conference scheduled in the proceeding, a petitioner shall file a supplement to the petition to intervene which must include a list of the contentions which are sought to be litigated in the matter. Each contention must consist of a specific statement of the issue of law or fact to be raised or controverted. In addition, the petitioner shall provide a brief explanation of the bases of the contention and a concise statement of the alleged facts or expert opinion which support the contention and on which the petitioner intends to rely in proving the contention at the hearing. The petitioner must also provide references to those specific sources and documents of which the petitioner is aware and on which the petitioner intends to rely to establish those facts or expert opinion. Petitioner must provide sufficient information to show that a genuine dispute exists with the applicant on a material issue of law or fact. Contentions shall be limited to matters within the scope of the action under t - 4 - consideration. The contention must be one which, if proven, would entitle the petitioner to relief. A petitioner who fails to file such a supplement which satisfies these requirements with respect to at least one contention will not be permitted to participate as a party. Those permitted to intervene become parties to the proceeding, subject to any limitations in the order granting leave to intervene, and have the opportunity tc participate fully in the conduct of the hearing, including the opportunity to present evidence and cross-examine witnesses. A request for a hearing or a petition for leave to intervene must be filed with the Secretary of the Commission, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555. Attention: Docketing and Service Branch, or may be delivered to the Commission's Public Document Room, the Gelman Building, 2120 L Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. . 20555. by the above date. Where petitions are filed during the last ten (10) days of the notice period, it is requested that the petitioner promptly so inform the Commission by a toll-free telephone call to Western Union at 1-(800) 325-6000 (in Missouri 1-(800) 342-6700). The Western Union operator should be given Datagram Identification Number 3737 and the following message addressed to Seymour H. Weiss: petitioner's name and telephone number; date petition was mailed; Fort St. Vrain Nuclear Generating Station; and publication date and page number of this FEDERAL REGISTER notice. A copy of the petition should also be sent to the Office of the General Counsel. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Washington. D.C. 20555, and to Mr. J. K. Tarpey, attorney for the licensee. Public Service Company Building. Room 900, 500 15th Street, Denver Colorado 80202. Y - 5 - Nontimely filings of petitions for leave to intervene, amended petitions, supplemental petitions and/or requests for hearing will not be entertained absent a determination by the Commission, the presiding officer or the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board that the petition and/or request should be grcnted based upon a balancing of the factors specified in 10 CFR 2.714(a)(1)(i)-(v) and 2.714(d). If a request for a hearing is received, the Commission's staff may issue the amendment after it completes its technical review and prior to the completion of any required hearing if it publishes a further notice for public comment of its proposed finding of no significant hazards considerations id accordance with 10 CFR 50.91 and 50.92. For further details with respect to this action, see the application for amendment dated June 6, 1990, which is available for public inspection at the Commission's Public Document Room, 2120 L Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20555, and at the Greeley Public Library, City Complex Building, Greeley, Colorado 80631. Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 27th day of August 1990. FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION erg 21Cic-fn-, Peter B. Erickson, Project Manager Non-Power Reactor, Decommissioning and Environmental Project Directorate Division of Reactor Projects - III, IV, V and Special Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation v(. nn IO-',- y HOARD OF ASSESSMENT APPEALS STATE OF COLORADO Docket Number 12814 ORDER DONALD H. HOLT, Petitioner, vs. WELD COUNTY HOARD OF EQUALIZATION, Respondent. THIS MATTER was heard by the Hoard of Assessment Appeals on August 15, 1990, Don Clifton and LaNee Streeter presiding. Petitioner did not appear and was not represented by counsel . Respondent was represented by Jan Allison, Assistant County Attorney. FINDINGS OF FACT: 1 . Subject property is described as follows: PIN: R 3576986 - PARCEL: 096118209001 - GR RG1-1 L1HLK1 - ROYAL GARDENS%2018 20TH ST RD% LOCATED AT 2018 20TH STREET ROAD - GREELEY (Weld County Schedule Number 096118209001 ) 2. Petitioner is protesting the 1989 actual value of the subject property. 3. Petitioner did not present any evidence at the hearing . 4. Respondent made a Motion to Dismiss since the Petitioner failed to meet the burden of proof. • \?".")("\\c . �s=mss, 0 .4 CONCLUSIONS: 1 . The written documentation filed by Petitioner was insufficient for the Board to make a decision as to the 1989 actual value of the subject property. 2. Petitioner failed to meet the burden of proof , in accordance with the Board' s Rule 14. 3. Petitioner did not provide the Board with any evidence that the Board could use to make a decision. 4. Board granted Respondent's Motion to Dismiss. ORDER: The petition is dismissed . DATED this An day of August, 1990. BOARD F ASSESSMENT APPPEALS 1' r— :SZ `w �/ D Clifton / tJ� L LaN a Street r I hereby certify that this is a tru correct copy of the decision of the Boa' - - ess peals. . yf J R. Sharp 12814.31 HOARD OF ASSESSMENT APPEALS STATE OF COLORADO Docket Number 12813 ORDER DONALD H. HOLT, Petitioner, vs. WELD COUNTY BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, Respondent. THIS MATTER was heard by the Board of Assessment Appeals on August 15. 1990. Don Clifton and LaNee Streeter presiding. Petitioner did not appear and was not represented by counsel . Respondent was represented by Jan Allison , Assistant County Attorney. FINDINGS OF FACT: 1 . Subject property is described as follows: PIN: R 1833486 - PARCEL: 093902217010 - GR 2PR9-10 - L10 BLK9 - PHEASANT RUN SUB 2ND FILING %4535 1ST% - LOCATED AT 4535 FIRST STREET (Weld County Schedule Number 095902217010) Petitioner is protesting the 1989 actual value of the subject property. 3. Petitioner did not present any evidence at the hearing. 4. Respondent made a Motion to Dismiss. r illi cONOLOSIONS: 1 . The written documentation filed by Petitioner was insufficient for the Board to make a decision as to the 1989 actual value of the subject property. 2. Petitioner failed to meet the burden of proof , in accordance with the Board ' s Rule 14. 3. Petitioner did not provide the Board with any evidence that the Board could use to make a decision. 4. Board granted Respondent' s Motion to Dismiss. ORDER: - The petition is dism-iissed. DATED thisd?day of August, 1990. BO OP ASSESSMENT APP ALS �✓L �� D n Clifton VZ0Ilk La ee tr a er 1 hereby certify that this is a true correct copy of the decision of \ the B`pard of Assess t ppeals. ) mes R. Sharp 12813.J1 BOARD OF ASSESSMENT APPEALS STATE OF COLORADO Docket Number 12812 ORDER DONALD H. HOLT. Petitioner. vs. WELD COUNTY BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, Respondent. THIS MATTER was heard by the Board of Assessment Appeals on August 15, 1990, Don Clifton and LaNee Streeter presiding. Petitioner did not appear and was not represented by counsel . Respondent was represented by Jan Allison, Assistant County Attorney. FINDINGS OF FACT: 1 . Subject property is described as follows: PIN: R3363486 - PARCEL 096110303018 LN1-44 L44 REPLAT OF PORTION OF L6-16 & L32-48 LINDALE SUB%1908 DILMONT AWL - LOCATED AT 1908 DILMONT AVENUE, GREELEY (Weld County Schedule Number 096110303018) 2. Petitioner is protesting the 1989 actual value of the subject property. _ . Petitioner did not present any evidence at the hearing . 4. Respondent made a Motion to Dismiss. • ' . 1 CONCLUSIONS: 1 . The written documentation filed by Petitioner was insufficient for the Hoard to make a decision as to the 1989 actual value of the subject property. 2. Petitioner failed to meet the burden of proof , in accordance with the Hoard' s Rule 14. 3. Petitioner did not provide the Hoard with any evidence that the Board could use to make a decision. 4. Board granted Respondent' s Motion to Dismiss. ORDER: The petition is dismissed. DATED this a70day of August, 1990. BOA F ASSESSMENT APPEALS D Clifton La a ree e I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of the decision of , Board of secs eals. J mes R. Sharp 12812.31 ' . 2 . , E' CC: -v .• ' PETITION TO TEE STATE BOARD OF AS'SESSIeNTJWEICLS Date: r , , 19%) TO THE HONORABLE BOARD of/1ASSESSMENT APPEALS: / Your Petitioner, ✓J /lov Red '.c7fi�d //"(/4r Mar/ (nAme C l f pr e�iRO�3/owner'/Cbl 546 eve �rnn cc , (street address, city, State, Zip Code of subject property) hea by appeals the decision of the (check one) County Board of Equalization County Board of Commissioners Property Tax Administrator for property located in the county of 4O4, that was dated , 19 , concerning: (check one) ✓ Valuation _Refund Exemption Abatement for the year(s) /99n DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: (Legal description - If multiple properties are involved in the one decision being appealed, a listing of the county schedule or parcel numbers with the corresponding properties - must be submitted as an attachment to the petition) PROPERTY CLASSIFICATION: This property is classified as: (Please check one ve Commercial, Residential, Vacant land, Industrial Agricultural, Natural Resources, Producing Mines, Oil and Gas, State Assessed, Exempt ATTACRMENTS TO THIS PETITION FORM: (Please check off the attachments you will be using) v/ The decision (County Board of Equalization,County Board of Commissioner, or Property Tax Administrator)thatis being appealed. This attachment MUST be with the petition in order for it to be accepted for docketing. ✓ If an agent is filing for or representing a petitioner, a notarized letter of authorization is required. The Assessors Notice of Denial. The facts and law (the issue(s) involved) , on which this appeal is based. List of witnesses and exhibits to be used at the hearing. Exhibits, if any, to be used at the hearing. ESTIMATED TIME FOR PETITIONER TO PRESENT THE APPEAL: r minutes or hours REPRESENTATION: (Please check appropriate responses) ,Petitioner will be present at the hearing, .or asGPetitioner requests that the Board rule on the documentation submitted. Petitioner will be represented by a Colorado Attorney __yes, no. 1 j( /� g 0 7 LEC i r m Make five (5) copies of this petition form with all attachments and exhibits. The original (with original signature) plus three entire copies (a total of four (4) ) are to be filed with the Board of Assessment Appeals; one entire copy to be filed with the Respondent (County Board of Equalization, County Commissioners or Property Tax Administrator) as shown in Certificate of Service; and one entire copy to be kept for Petitioner's records. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify to the Board of Assessment Appeals that I have mailed (or hand delivered) one copy of this etition form, together with all attachments and exhibits, to the clibG (indicate one) County Board of Equalizations, County Board of Commission s, or Property Tax Administrator in [A/Pla Upt,m 7 Colorado, on litirk_ , 1922. G44., *Attorney or agent for Petitioner etitioner's 'gnature _A Ax .22e4— Attorney's or agent's Address Petitioner's mailing address Alm) 7sz - 77/7 Attorney's Telephone No. Petitioner's Telephone No. *Please fill out attorney information only if a Colorado attorney will be representing you at the hearing. An attorney may be retained at any time subsequent to filing appeal; however, if an attorney is later retained, the information must be submitted in writing. T8/pet.frm BAA1 revised 1990 2 RESOLUTION RE: THE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, 1990, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PETITION OF: Savage, Savage & Brown 2932 N. W. 122nd Oklahoma City, OK 73120 DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: Dillon Real Estate Company PARCEL 095911124014 PIN R 0021187 WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, - - Colorado, organized as a Board of Equalization for the purpose of adjusting, equalizing, raising or lowering the assessment and valuation of real and personal property within this County, fixed and made by the County Assessor for the year 1990, and WHEREAS, said petition has been heard before the County Assessor and due notice of determination thereon has been given to the taxpayer(s) , and WHEREAS, the taxpayer(s) presented a petition of appeal to the County Assessor's valuation for the year 1990, claiming grounds for relief thereunder stating the property described in such petition was assessed too high, as more specifically stated in said petition, and WHEREAS, said petitioner was neither present nor represented, and WHEREAS, the Board has made its findings on the evidence, testimony and remonstrances and is now fully informed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners o£ Weld County, Colorado, acting as the Board of Equalization, that after review of the evidence presented at the hearing, did determine that the value placed upon the petitioner's property by the Weld County Assessor was inadequate: therefore, this Board finds that the assessment and valuation of the Improvements only, on said property shall be, and hereby are, increased from $221,087 to $265,000, and the total of the Land and Improvements shall be increased from $341,087 to $385,000. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this determination by the Board of Equalization, may be appealed by selecting one of the following three options: 900686 • �; . .> OFFICE OF WELD COUNTYASinsSiornESSOR11:CHNI - pHaa cam)356.000 ocr..zsa c��,,cou,n�oo 6oe3, r O COLORADO July 27, 1990 Savage, Savage and Brown X Mr. Mark Brown 2932 North West 122nd Oklahoma City, OK 73120 Mr. Mark Brown: This letter is to confirm a conversation with your firm on July 27, 1990. In the telephone conversation it was agreed that we would stipulate to $1,200,000 on account #6768386; the Greeley building, Greeley, Colorado. This is as you asked in your protest petition. Along with the enclosed stipulation form (which you will need to sign and return as soon as possible) is a copy of the current personal property form on the Dillon Real Estate Mini-Mart you represent in Greeley, Colorado. As you can see we have no pumps, tanks or other station equipment on the personal records for this store. Because of this and the fact that we do include these on the real property records it was agreed that you would withdraw from the protest on this account. The value we currently carry on pin #0021187 is for $341,087 and , will remain at that level with no further action on either part., If you need further assistance or information please feel free to contact me anytime. Sincerely, O� Michael Sampson Chief Appraiser . enclosure MS/brd .J 1-• HALE, SWIM 4.33triLLLA.M nP.C. AT/fro:n ys:0 L�RW v' NL. RAYMOND S. HALE •25 WEST MMLSERRY�iSSTREpbET. SUITE 117 MICHAEL 0. LIOOETT PORT COLLINS. COtgargµg e0(1IT-7(166 TELEPHONE MICHELE RING MOKELLAR' TO TEE BOARD (300) •02.61)0 THOMAS H. MOORE TEE BOARD ERIC A. PETERSON DAVID 6. rOwEA FACSIMILE KELSEY J. SMITH (202) •Ot-0220 DAVE WILLIAMS ZACHARY 0. WILSON -Al.• AOnnnfl In WYOmin6 August 29, 1990 CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED NO. P 430 544 416 Weld County Board of Equalization Post Office Box 758 Greeley, Colorado 80632 RE: Personal Property Tax Appeal Little Caesars Pizza of Northern Colorado, Inc. Ladies and Gentlemen: Enclosed with this letter is one copy of a Petition to the State Board of Assessment Appeals filed on behalf of my client, Little Caesars Pizza of Northern Colorado, Inc. , of the 1990 valuation of personal property owned by my client and located in Weld County. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Very truly yours, Dave Williams DW/ssb Enclosure cc: Little Caesars Pizza of Northern Colorado, Inc. Soukup & Associates, P.C. �C10 Ce : CL�-� PETITION TO THE STATE BOARD or ASSESSMENT APPEALS • Date: August 28 , 19 90 TO THE HONORABLE BOARD OF ASSESSMENT APPEALS: Your Petitioner, Little Caesars Pizza of Northern Colorado, Inc. • (name of property owner) 375 East Horsetooth, Building 6, Suite 102, Fort Collins, Colorado, 80525 (street address, City, State, Zip Code of subject property) hearby appeals the decision of the (check one) X County Board of Equalization County Board of Commissioners Property Tax Administrator for property located in the county of Weld that was dated August 3 , 1990 , concerning: (check one) X Valuation Refund Exemption Abatement for the year(S) 1990 - DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: (Legal description - If multiple properties are involved in the one decision being appealed, a listing of the county schedule or parcel numbers with the corresponding properties - must be submitted as an attachment to the petition) Appeal involves personal property, for which attachment lists schedule numbers and locations. PROPERTY CLASSIFICATION: This property is classified as: (Please check one) X Commercial, Residential, Vacant land, Industrial Agricultural, Natural Resources, Producing Mines, Oil and Gas, State Assessed, Exempt ATTACHMENTS TO THIS PETITION FORM: (Please checkoff the attachments you will be using) X The decision (County Board of Equalization,County Board of Commissioner, or Property Tax Administrator)thatis being appealed. This attachment MUST be with the petition in order for it to be accepted for docketing. If an agent is filing for or representing a petitioner, a notarized letter of authorization is required. __X--The Assessor's Notice of Denial. The facts and law (the issue(s) involved) , on which this appeal is based. List of witnesses and exhibits to be used at the hearing. Exhibits, if any, to be used at the hearing. ESTIMATED TINE FOR PETITIONER TO PRESENT THE APPEAL: 30-60 minutes or hours REPRESENTATION: (Please check appropriate responses) X Petitioner will be present at the hearing, or Petitioner requests that the Board rule on the documentation submitted. Petitioner will be represented by a Colorado Attorney &yes,_no. 1 . Make five (5) copies of this petition form with all attachments and exhibits. The original (with original signature) plus three entire copies (a total of four (4) ) are to be filed with the Board of Assessment Appeals; one entire copy to be filed with the Respondent (County Board of Equalization, County Commissioners or Property Tax . Administrator) as shown in Certificate of Service; and one entire copy to be kept for Petitioner's records. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify to the Board of Assessment Appeals that I have mailed (or hand delivered) one copy of this petition form, together with all . attachments and exhibits, to the (indicate one) County Board of Equalization, Ammiuistomar in Greeky Colorado, on August29 , 1990. L.J L.~1.. 1.,3 -eC a t.f 7. • *Attorney or agent for Petitioner Petitioner's signature Hale, Smith h Williams Attorney's or agent's Address Petitioner's mailing address 425 West Mulberry Fort Collins, Colorado (303) 482-9770 Attorney's Telephone No. Petitioner's Telephone No. *Please fill out attorney information only if a Colorado attorney will be representing you at the hearing. An attorney may be retained at any time subsequent to filing appeal; however, if an attorney is later retained, the information must be submitted in writing. T8/pet.frm BAA1 revised 1990 2 ATTACHMENT TO PETITION TO THE STATE BOARD OF ASSESSMENT APPEALS LIST OF SCHEDULE NUMBERS AND LOCATION OF PROPERTIES BEING APPEALED FROM WELD COUNTY: Schedule No. yocatxon, 0010316 2331 23rd Avenue, Greeley, Colorado 0013852 3810 West 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado 12ESOLUTION RE: THE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, 1990, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PETITION OF: LITTLE CAESARS PIZZA OF NORTHERN COLO SHORES SIX SUITE 102 375 E HORSETOOTH RD FORT COLLINS, CO 80525 DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: PIN: P 0010316 PARCEL: 095913120001 - 2331 23 AV GREEL GR BPSC-B BRENTWOOD PARK SHOPPING CENTER . WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, organized as a Board of Equalization for the purpose of adjusting, equalizing, raising or lowering the assessment and valuation of real and personal property within this County, fixed and made by the County Assessor for the year 1990, and WHEREAS, said petition has been heard before the County Assessor and due notice of adjustment thereon has been given to the taxpayer(s) , and WHEREAS, the taxpayer(s) presented a petition of appeal to the County Assessor's valuation for the year 1990, claiming grounds for relief thereunder stating the property described in such petition was assessed too high, as more specifically stated in said petition, and WHEREAS, said petitioner not being represented, and WHEREAS, the Board has made its findings on the evidence, testimony and remonstrances and is now fully informed. • NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, acting as the Board of Equalization, that the evidence presented at the hearing clearly supported the value placed upon the Petitioner's property by the Weld County Assessor. Such evidence indicated the value was reasonable, equitable, and derived according to the methodologies, percentages, figures and formulas dictated to the Weld County Assessor by law. As such, this Board finds that the Petitioner failed to meet its burden of proving that the Assessor's valuation was incorrect. The assessment and valuation of the Weld County Assessor shall be, and hereby is, affirmed. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a denial of a petition, in whole or in part, by the Board of Equalization maybe appealed by selecting one of the following three options: • Page 2 RE: BOE - LITTLE CAESARS PIZZA OF NORTBERN' COLO 1. Board of Assessment anneals: You have the right to appeal the County Board of Equalization's (CBOE's) decision to the Board of Assessment Appeals (BAA) . Such hearing is the Sinal hearing at which testimony, exhibits or any other evidence may be introduced. If the decision of the BAA is further appealed to the Court of Appeals, play the record created at the BAA hearing shall be the basis for the Court's decision. No new evidence can be introduced at the Court of Appeals. (39-8-108(1) , CRS) Appeals to the BAA must be made on forms furnished by • the BAA, and should be mailed or delivered within thirty (30) days of denial by the CBOE to: Board of Assessment Appeals 1313 Sherman Street, Room 523 Denver, CO 80203 Phone: 866-5880 OR 2• Distaiser_soan: You have the right to appeal the CBOE's decision to the District Court of the county wherein your r any othroperty er evidence may cbe dintroduceds at tyh�e Di ibits o strict Court hearing. For filing requirements please contact your attorney or the Clerk of the District Court. Further appeal of the District Court's decision is made to the Court of Appeals for a review of the record. (39-8-108(1) , CRS) OR 3. Binding Arbitration: You have the right to submit your case to arbitration. If you choose this option the arbitrator's decision is linJil and your right to appeal your current valuation ends. (39-8-108.5, CRS) Selecting %be Arbitrator - In order to pursue arbitration, you must notify the OBOE of your intent. You and the CBOE select an arbitrator from the official list of qualified people. If you cannot agree on an arbitrator, the District Court of the county in which the property is located will make the selection. Arbitration Rearing_procedurt - Arbitration hearings are held within sixty days from the date the arbitrator is selected. Both you and the CBOE are entitled to participate. The hearings are informal. The arbitrator has the authority • Page 3 RE: DOE - LITTLE CAESARS PIZZA OF NORTHERN. COLO to issue subpoenas forwitnesses, and other evid nce Be also tirecords, has the power to administer oaths, and all questions of law and fact shall be determined by him. The arbitration hearing may be confidential and closed to the public, upon mutual agreement. The arbitrator's written decision must be delivered to both parties personally „,_ or by registered mail within ten (10) days of the hearing. Such decision is sjnel and not subject to review. Feu and Extenses - The arbitrator's fees and expenses are agreed upon by you and the CBOE. In the case of residential real property, such fees and expenses cannot exceed 5150.00 per case. The arbitrator's fees and expenses, not including counsel fees, are to be paid as provided in the . decision. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 22:g day of A st, A. . , 990. ATTEST:/ � Gi.4 4 BOARD OF COUNTS CONICSSIONERS WE Writ COLORADOWeld County Clerk to the Board CY)/ 1 ene R. Brantner, Chairman eputy Clerk t the Board Ge e K nne y, Pro-Tem D AS TO FORM: ,�, cam, onstance L. liar e i d ' e t t Le Tarn-- ,....nty Attorney C. W. Kir GOr agpLUTION RE: THE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, 1990, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PETITION OF: LITTLE CAESARS PIZZA SHORES SIX SUITE 102 375 EAST HORSETOOTH RD • FT COLLINS, CO 80525 DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: PIN: P 0013852 PARCEL: 095911124006 - 3810 W 10 ST CREEL GR B1 -TB TR "B" BITTERSWEET NORTH WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, organized as a Board of Equalization for the purpose of adjusting, equalizing, raising or lowering the assessment and valuation of real and personal property within this County, fixed and made by the County Assessor for the year 1990,' and WHEREAS, said petition has been heard before the County Assessor and due notice of adjustment thereon has been given to the taxpayer(s) , and WHEREAS, the taxpayer(s) presented a petition of appeal to the County Assessor's valuation for the year 1990, claiming grounds for relief thereunder stating the property described in such petition was assessed too high, as more specifically stated in said petition, and WHEREAS, said petitioner not being represented, and WHEREAS, the Board has made its findings on the evidence, testimony and remonstrances and is now fully informed. • NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, acting as the Board of Equalization, that the evidence presented at the hearing clearly supported the value placed upon the Petitioner's property by the Weld County Assessor. Such evidence indicated the value was reasonable, equitable, and derived according to the methodologies, percentages, figures and formulas dictated to the Weld County Assessor by law. As such, this Board finds that the Petitioner failed to meet its burden of proving that the Assessor's valuation was incorrect. The assessment and valuation of the Weld County Assessor shall be, and hereby is, affirmed. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a denial of a petition, in whole or in part, by the Board of Equalization maybe appealed by selecting 9ng of the following. three options: Page 2 RE: BOE - LITTLE CAESARS PIZZA 1. Board of Assessment Arceals: You have the right to appeal the County Board of Equalization's (CBOE's) decision to the Board of Assessment Appeals (BAA) . Such hearing is the line1 hearing at which testimony, exhibits or any other evidence may be introduced. If the decision of the BAA is further appealed to the Court of Appeals, only the record created at the BAA hearing shall be the basis for the Court's decision. No new evidence can be introduced at the Court of . Appeals. (39-8-108(1) , CRS) • Appeals to the BAA must be made on forms furnished by • the BAA, and should be mailed or delivered within thirty (30) days of denial by the CBOE •to: Board of Assessment Appeals 1313 Sherman Street, Room 523 Denver, CO 80203 Phone: 866-5880 OR 2• District Court: You have the right to appeal the CBOE's decision to the District Court of the county wherein your property is located. New testimony, exhibits or any other evidence may be introduced at the District Court hearing. For filing requirements please contact your attorney or the Clerk of the District Court. Further appeal of the District Court's decision is made to the Court of Appeals for a review of the record. (39-8-108(1) , CRS) oR 3. Binding Arbitration: You have the right to submit your case to arbitration. If you choose this option the arbitrator's decision is lima and your right to appeal your current valuation ends. (39-8-108.5, CRS) Delectina the Arbitrator - In order to pursue arbitration, you must notify the OBOE of your intent. You and the OBOE select an arbitrator from the official list of qualified people. If you cannot agree on an arbitrator, the District Court of the county in which the property is located will make the selection. Arbitration Hearin Procedure - Arbitration hearings are held within sixty days from the date the arbitrator is selected. Both you and the CBOE are entitled to participate. The hearings are informal. The arbitrator has the authority Page 3 RE: BOE - LITTLE CAESARS PIZZA to issue subpoenas for witnesses, books, records, documents . and other evidence. He also has the power to administer oaths, and all questions of law and fact shall be determined by him. The arbitration hearing may be confidential and closed to the public, upon mutual agreement. The arbitrator's written decision must be delivered to both parties personally or by registered mail within ten (10) days of the hearing. Such decision is jam], and not subject to review. Fees and Exuenses - The arbitrator's fees and expenses are agreed upon by you and the CBOE. In. the case of residential real property, such fees and expenses cannot exceed $150.00 per case. The arbitrator's fees and expenses, not including counsel fees, are to be paid as provided in the decision. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the ,3a day of A st, A . , 990. ATTEST: ��41.4 0 fj BOARD OF COUNTY COMlI<SSIONERS Weld County Clerk t the Board LINTY, nD0 � K ene R. Bran ar, Chairman ipeputy Cleric ta`t2ie Board j G e Kennedy, Pro e AP D AS TO FORM: ` .rr"1"��/�.j • Constance L. Harbert • igegilett ounty Attorney C. w. K rb co OFFICE OF COUNTY ASSESSOR • : :' 91S 10th STREET-.3/4\4\i, i.t a aw.r. NOTICE OF ADJUSTMENT COLORADO S0631 PHONE(30 GRERLE)3564pp0, PJc[ 4256 WineGR kIN—T$ TR "Bar BITTERSWEET NORTH COLORADO 3810 W le ST GREELEY OWNER LITTLE CAESARS PIZZA SOUKUP t ASSOCIATES PARCEL 095911124006 PIN P 0013852 2850 PIC CLELLAND DR SUITE :3000 YEAR 1990 FORT COLLINS CO 80525 LOG 00087 07/02/1990 The appraised value of property is based on the appropriateconsideration of the approachestb value required by law.The Assessor has determined that your property should be included in the following category(ies): _Residential property is valued by considering the cost and market approaches. —Agricultural land value is determined solely by the taming or production capacity of the land,capitalized at a rate set by law. Producing mines are assessed at 25%of the gross proceeds or 100%of the net proceeds,whichever is greater. —Oil and gas leaseholds and lands are assessed at 87.5%of the gross value of the oil and/or gas sold or transported from the premises on primary production;secondary production is valued at 75%. -All other property,including vacant land,is valued by considering the cost,market,and income approaches. If your concern is the amount of your property tax, local taxing authorities (county,city, fire protection,and other special districts) hold budget hearings in the fall.Please refer to your tax bill or ask your Assessorfora listing of these dlsbk,b,and plan to attend these budget hearings. The Assessor has carefully studied all available information, giving particular attention to the specifics included on your protest and has deter- mined the valuations)assigned to your property.The reasons for this determination of value are: YOUR PERSONAL PROPERTY ACCOUNT HAS SEEN ADJUSTED FOR 1990. PROPERTY CLASSIFICATION PETITIONER'S ESTIMAT ASSESSOR'S VALUATION OF VALUE ACTUAL VALUE ACTUAL VALUE PRIOR TO REVIEW AFTER REVIEW PERSONAL PROPERTY 812041 803848 TOTALS S S 813 041 S 80 3 848 f you disagree with the Assessors decision,you have the right to appeal to the County Board of Equalization for further consideration, r • : 106(13(a),C.R.S. Please see the back of this form for detailed information on filing your appeal. By: RICHARD W. KEIRNES e7/n3/oo WELD COUNTY ASSESSOR DATE 25 orracE OP COUNTY ASSESSOR �� tr ' +' yam,' 91510th STREET . . 11L NOTSCE OF DENIAL GREELEY,COLORADOE06J1 PRONE(303)X56-t0p0, EXT.4230 "Elk GR DPSC DRENTWOOD PARK SHOPPIMG CENTER COLORADO • 2331 23 AV GREELEY OWNER. LITTLE CAESARS PIZZA OF NORTHERN COLO SOUKUP 6 ASSOCIATES PARCEL 095913120001 PIN P 0010316 2850 MC CLELLAND DR SUITE 3000 • YEAR 1990 FORT COLLINS CO 80525 LOG 00088 07/02./1990 The appraised value of property is based on the appropriate consideration of the approaches to value required by law.The Assessor has determined that your property should be included in the following categoryBes): —Residential property is valued by considering the cost and market approaches. -Agricultural land value is determined solely by the earning or production capacity of the land,capitalized at a rate set by law. -Producing mines are assessed at 25%of the gross proceeds or 100%of the net proceeds,whichever is greater. Oil and gas leaseholds and lands are assessed at 87.5% of the gross value of the oil and/or gas sold or transported from the premises on primary production:secondary production is valued at 75%. _All other property,including vacant land,is valued by considering the cost,market,and income approaches. If your concern is the amount of your property tax, local taxing authorities (county,city,fire protection, and other specW district° hold budget hearings in die fall.Plane refer to your tax bill or ask your Assessor for a listing of those districts,and plan to attend these budget hearings. The Assessor has carefully studied all available information, giving particular attention to the spec:fits included on your protest and has deter- mined the valuation(s)assigned to your property.The reasons for this determination of value are: YOUR PERSONAL PROPERTY HAS BEEN ASSESSED IN ACCORDANCE WITH COLORADO LAW AND INSTRUCTIONS PUDLISHED 13Y THE STATE DIVISION OF PROPERTY TAXATION. OTHER PERSONAL PROPERTY& SIMILAR IN NATURE& HAS SEEN CONSISTENTLY ASSESSED USING THE SAME STATUTORY METHODS. PETITIONER'S ASSESSOR'S VALUATION PROPERTY CLASSIFICATION ESTIMATE ACTUAL VALVE ACTUAL VALUE OF VALUE PRIOR TO REVIEW AFTER REVIEw PERSONAL PROPERTY 71a297 71.297 1 TOTALS S S 71.297 S 716 297 If you disagree with tha Assessor's decision,you have the right to appeal to the County Board of Equalizadon for further consideration, 39.8.1061111a1,C.R.S. Planeeseee tthh/e back ooffl this �foorOm for detailed information on filing your appeal. By: RICHARD W. 11GIRNEJ n,ph-tan WELD COUNTY ASSESSOR GATE y'l it , u ._ ...♦wvy�, •� y. ,r� }p,ot <c.v .+a • r ,„ 'v.7 4'.4.:1 kdrott d'p •*' g� Fi^'rd�r ',..'.4.:1,17- 7 ` k 1,A � -a:- � ,tea, �" a+ "Cv5,lo �`^ "1 North American 4 '• Property Consultants, Inc .0n 640 E. Eisenhower Blvd. Suite A , Loveland, CO 80:5;7 a t�.r..x. . �� CA}5Y+4451 /lG�7�4� +«,��+� .4." , + }J�4.f 1`.:4.:„ 1 r 1�, to*, y /.,Nn 5.,.fv P 4F Y3 ptYE d w �r‘l 4� 9�Mt p 3� �I M y R kt r r roF .�1`. { -error 1 • Y +� - ) @ '�` )fr ira.q M�- }i Weld Ctj' .. Y. Board of £ W - ' 915 10th Street/PO 9ualizatio� Greele 80632 Box 758 , Y� CO .: rn;tw J / ak #.�. ^E:1tir 9Ajf5itilig. o r• . ^2, • . Ll eSr �,y r f f i ITIvN TO T..F V i rf I G: BOARD V. A.7,:.-; M ENT L'r4T APPEALS O�It Au�.tst 20 , 1990 TC THE HOMO BASLE BOARD OF ASSESSMENT A 'PEwLS: Your Petitioner,_ Stener & Frances Carlson • (name of pr'oper'ty owner) 3815 Hwy 119 - Longmont,. CO (Street address, City, State, Zip Code of subject property) hereby appeals the decision of the (check one) �X_County Board of Equalization County Board of Commissioner= Property Tax Administrator for property located in the County of We}d that wao dated August 17,, 1990, concernins (check one) X Valuation Refund Exemption Abatement for the year(s) 1990. DESCRIPTION CF PROPERTY: (Lesal description - if multiple propert`es are involved in the one decision bring appealc+ 11 a li:4tzn, of the county schedule or parcel numbers with the cerrespondins properties - must be submitted as an attachment to the petition) PARCEL #1751303O00O41/PIN R 006osee PROPa:RTY CLASSIFICATION: This property is classified as: (Ple a_a check one) X Commercial residential Vacant land Industrial Asricultur'al Natural Resources Producing Minos Oil and Gas State ALsessed Exempt • ATTACHMENTS TO THIS PETITION FORM: (Please check o{f the attachments you will be using) X Tho decision (County Board of Equalization, County Board of Commi_sioner:;, or property Tax Administrator) that is boin; appealed. This attachment MUST be with the petition in order for it to b, ca=c4:.,1 wed for docketins. X The Acsesser 'c Notice of Denial. X The facto and law (the issue(s) invelvod) , on which this appe.a:. i- tamed. C.R.S 39-6-108 (1) X List of witnesses wand exhibits to be used at the hE_arino. (Per BAA Rule 11 To be determined) X Exhibits, if any, to be used at the hearin3. (Per ERR Rule 11 To be determined) ESTIMATED TIME FOR PETITIONER TO PRESENT THE APPEAL: 60 minute=s or 1 hours RF_Pr:ELENTATION: (Please chock appropriate responsoz) Petitioner will be present ' at •the hearing, or titione;* requests that the Board rule on the documont�..czer, submitted. Petitioner will be repre7,ented by rl Colorrado Att r'rI y E q cs 1 c+f 2 rlake five (;') copies of this petition form with all attachments and oxh ibits. The original (with orisinal signature) plus three entire copies (a total of four (4) ) are to be filed 1:with he Board of Assessment Appeals; one entire copy to be fileBoard` with the nospondont (County Board of Equalization, County Commis:iioners or Property Tax Administrator) as shown in ) Certificate of Service; and one entire copy to be kept for 1 Pa:tit'.oner's re=cords. CERTI"IrATE OF cErr,.VI E l - t 1 certify to the Board of Assessment Appeals that I have mailed (or hand delivered) one copy of this petition form, „r with all attachments and exhibits, to the Weld ( indicate one) County Board of Equalization, County Board of f Commissioners, or Property Tax Administrator in Greeley f Colorado, on August 29, 1990. g , _ . ° duli�Greni Petitioner 's signature � Attorney for Pet ' tioner- Reg. No. 1.1--.;025, 640 E. Eisenhower Blvd. Petitioner 's mailing address Suite A • !overland, Colorado POS77 (303) 667-G96S 4t P'etitioner 's, Telephone No. A • • 4t0005 • • 'Doge 2 of BESOLUTxpN • RE: THE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, 1990, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PETITION OF: CARLSON STENER & FRANCES E 4111 GLADE RD LOVELAND, CO 80537 DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: PIN:757ff 400,88 PARCEL: 131303000041 LCI-1 L1 LONGMONT CENTENNIAL INN SUB %3815 HWY 119% WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, organized as a Board of Equalization for the purpose of adjusting, equalizing, raising or lowering the assessment and valuation of real and personal property within this County, fixed and made by the County Assessor for the year 1990, and WHEREAS, said petition has been heard before the County Assessor and due notice of adjustment thereon has been given to the taxpayer(s) , and WHEREAS, the taxpayer(s) presented a petition of appeal to the County Assessor's valuation for the year 1990, claiming grounds for relief thereunder stating the property described in such petition was assessed too high, as more specifically stated in said petition, and WHEREAS, said petitioner being represented by North American Property Consultants, who submitted a letter regarding said petition, and WHEREAS, the Board has made its findings on the evidence, testimony and remonstrances and is now fully informed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, acting as the Board of Equalization, that the evidence presented at the hearing clearly supported the value placed upon -the Petitioner's property by the Weld County Assessor. Such evidence indicated the value was reasonable, equitable, and derived according to the methodologies, percentages, figures and formulas dictated to the Weld County Assessor by law. As such, this Board finds that the Petitioner failed to meet its burden of proving that the Assessor' s valuation was incorrect. The assessment and valuation of the Weld County Assessor shall bc, and hereby is, affirmed. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a denial of a petition, in whole or in part, by the Board of Equalization may be appealed by selecting one of the following three options: auk Z 3 'V � *-C \\!E/11 o 7-; • Page 2 RE: HOE - CARLSON STENER & FRANCES E 1. Board o£ Assessment Appeals: You have the right to appeal the County Board of Equalization's (CBOE's) decision to the Board of Assessment Appeals (BAA) . Such hearing is the final hearing at which testimony, exhibits or any other evidence may be introduced. If the decision of the BAA is further appealed to the Court of Appeals, only the record created at the BAA hearing shall be the basis for the Court's decision. No new evidence can be introduced at the Court of Appeals. (39-8-108 (1) , CRS) Appeals to the BAA must be made on forms furnished by the BAA, and should be mailsd or delivered within thirty (30) days of denial by the CBOE to: S. Board of Assessment Appeals 1313 Sherman Street, Room 523 Deriver, CO 80203 Phone: 866-5880 OR 2 . District Court: You have the right to appeal the CBOE's decision to the District Court of the county wherein your property is located. New testimony, exhibits or any other evidence may be introduced at the District Court hearing. For filing requirements please contact your attorney or the clerk of the District Court. Further appeal of the District Court's decision is made to the Court of Appeals for a review of the record. (39-8-108 (1) , CRS) oR • 3 . Binding Arbitration: You have the right to submit your case to arbitration. If you choose this option the arbitrator's decision is final, and your right to appeal your current valuation ends. (39-8-108.5, CRS) Selecting the Arbitrator - In order to pursue arbitration, you must notify the CBOE of your intent. You and the CBOE select an arbitrator from the official list of qualified people. If you cannot agree on an arbitrator, the District Court of the county in which the property is located will make the selection. Arbitration Hearing Procedure - Arbitration hearings are held within sixty days from the date the arbitrator is selected. Both you and the CBOE are entitled to participate. The hearings are informal . The arbitrator has the authority RECENEU 03S Page 3 RE: ECE - CARLSON STENER & FRANCES E to issue subpoenas for witnesses, books, records, documents and other evidence. He also has the power to administer oaths, and all questions of law and fact shall be determined by him. The arbitration hearing may be confidential and closed to the public, upon mutual agreement. The arbitrator's written decision must be delivered to both parties personally or by registered mail within ten (10) days of the hearing. Such decision is linal and not subject to review. lees and Exaenses - The arbitrator's fees and expenses arc agreed upon by you and the CBOE. In the case of residential real property/ such fees and expenses cannot exceed $150. 00 per case. The arbitrator's fees and expenses, not including counsel fees, are to be paid as provided in the decision. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 27th day of Ju , A.D. , / a199 ATTEST: /// WW_ V Oa-2 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CCC /� WELD LINTY, COLORADO Weld County Clerk to the Board ene R. Brant er, Chairman 1:peputy Clerk to the Board .ems... ae ge Kennedy, Pro-Te. APPROVE AS TO FORM: / const?�rp Ha�Yt ,�/ ✓ r �:m..- 1 _ '" __ 7:24X;IV i. — County Attorney C. W. Kirby (EXCUSED)_ -Gordon E. Lacy �c_01;\\\C) �S.CS • / 915 105 STREET GREELEY,COLORADO 5063: PHONE+ NOTICE OF .DENIAL- ti0SEr303)356-s000. EXT.;=`� ni'!��,1b_�, LCI-1 Ll LL'1 G:1UNT CENTER:UAL 'NUSJ3 3d1 Jt• k:1/4911 yfJ �_'' 9: COLORADO 0i1NER -CARLSON -STENER G FRANCES C N.A•P.C. PARCEL 131303000041 'PIN • • R '0080038 640 C. EISENNOWERa ST es A YEAR 1990 LOVELAND CU 80537 LOY 00862 06/13/1990 The appraised value of property is based on the appropriate consideration of the approaches to value required by taw.The Assessor has determined that your property should be included in the following eategory(ies): Residential property is valued by considering the cost and market approaches. —Agricultural land value is determined solely by the earning or production capacity of the land,capitalized at a rate set by law, -Producing mines are assessed at 25°0 of the gross proceeds or 100%of the net proceeds,whichever is greater. _Oil and gas leaseholds and lands are assessed at 87.5% of the gross value of the oil and/or gas sold or transported from the premises on primary production;secondary production is valued at 75%. -All other property,including vacant land,is valued by considering the cost,market,and income approaches. If your concern is the amount of your property tax, local taxing authorities (county, city, fire protection, and other special districts) hold budget hearings in the fall. Please refer to your tax bill or ask your Assessor for a listing of these districts,and plan to attend these budget hearings. The Assessor has carefully studiedall available information, giving particularattention to the specifics included on your protest and has deter- mined��UvaLF1M 4scas�An$dPlitiirPage.T ?A t"Ao�TUateCTAr28%neltar" THIS PROPERTY. COLORADO LAN REQUIRES US TO SEffD THIS NOTICE OF DENIAL FOR ALL PROPERTIES ON WHICH WE DO NOT ADJUST THE VALUE. - PETITIONER'S •- ASSESSOR'S VALUATION 1 PROPERTY CLASSIFICATION ESTIMATE ACTUAL VALUE ACTUAL VALUE OF VALUE PRIOR TO REVIEW AFTER REVIEW -- 1 LAND - 401x030 401;080 IMPS 734x920 734j920 TOTALS S S la 000 S Is 1.361 V0 If you disagree with the Assessor's decision,you have the right to appeal to the County Board of Equalization for further eon:ideration, 33.3.100(1)(3),C.R.S. Please seo the back of this form for detailed information on filing your appeal. RICHARD W. KEIRNES 06/19/90 _ Sy. 'WE LD COUNTY ASSESSOR DATE +c_^^--no At7n1TIOf�A� INFORMATION ON REVERSE SIDE "'EM I T i CNSTATE nr �,ti,� � I TC HE BOARD Ci ASSESSMENT APPEALS Date: August 28 . 1990 TC THE KON,').RABLE BOARD OP ASSESSMENT APPEALS: Your Petitioner, Jim/Steve Freeman _ (name of property owner) 2028 9th St. _- . CO (Gtreet address, City, State, Zip Code of subject property) hereby appeals the decision of the (check: one) X County Board of Equalization County Board cf Commissioner_ Property Tax Administrator- for property located in the County of Weld that was dated August 17. 1990, concerning (check one::) X Valuation Refund Exemption Abatement for the year(s) 1990. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: (Legal description - if multiple properties are involved in they one decision being appealed, a listing of the county schedule or parcel numbers with the corresponding properties - must be submitted as an attachment to they petition) PARCEL #09610632.`,x001/PIN R 2970.386. PROPERTY CLASSIFICATION: This property is classified as: (Please check: one) X Commercial Residential Vacant land Industrial Agricultural Natural Resources Producing "lines Oil and Gas State Assessed Exempt ATTACHMENTS TO THIS PETITION FORM: (Please check off the attachments you will be using) X The decision (County Board of Equalization, County Board of Commissioners, or Property Tax Administrator) that is being appealed.. This attachment MUST be with the petition in order for it to be accepted for docketing. X They Assessor's Notice of Denial . • X The facts and law (the issue(s) involved) , on which this appeal is based. C.R.S 39-S-108 (1) X -List - of Witnesses and e;thi`oitJ to . be used-at ' the hearing. • (Per BAA Rule 11 To be determined) X Exhibits, if any, to be used at the hearing. • (per BAA Rule 11 To be determined) • ESTIMATED TIME FOR PETITIONER TO PRESENT THE APPEAL: 60 minutes or 1 hours REPRESENTATION: (Please check appropriate 'responses) Petitioner will 'be.present at the hearing;-or Petitioner requests that .the Board rule on the documentation submitted. ^eitioner will . L-e repr te'hted by a Colorado Attorney _,_,_ye•i" n o. page 1 of 2 Mak° five (5) copies of this petition form with all attachments and exhibits. The original (with original signature) plus three entire copies (a total of four (4) ) are to be filed ; .,with the Board of Assessment Appeals; one entire copy to be filed with the Respondent (County Board of Equalization, County Commissioners or Property Tax Administrator) as shown in Certificate of Service; and one entire copy to be kept for Petitioner 's records. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify to the Board of Asse=ssment Appeals that I have mailed (or hand delivered) one copy of this petition form, together with all attachments and exhibits, to the Weld ( indicate one) County Board of Equalization, County Board of Commissioners. or property Tax Administrator in Greeley Colorado, on August 29, 1990. ,1 Juli • Greni Petitioner 's signature Attorney for Pe itioner Reg. No. 15025 640 E. Eisenhower Blvd. Petitioner's mailing address Suite A Loveland, Colorado 50537 (• 0v) 667-8968 x Petitioner 's Telephone No. • • viuz page-2 of 2 ' /3&? • RESOLUTION RE: THE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, 1990, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO— ' • PETITION OF: FREEMAN JAMES F & STEVEN J c 427 2ST LA SALLE, C0 80645 DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: PIN • H�CEL: 096106325001 • - GR 2563 W78.8 ' L1 TO 4 & •4078.8' OF N15' L5 BLK5 PACKARDS%2028 9TH ST$ WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, . • Colored., organized as a Board of Equalization,.for thepurpose of adjusting, equalizing, raising 'or .lowering the'assessment and valuation of real and personal property within •.this County, fixed and made by the County Assessor for the year, 1990, and WHEREAS, said petition has been heard before the County Assessor and due notice of adjustment thereon has been given • to the_taxpayer(s) , and • WHEREAS, the taxpayer(s) presented a petition ,of appeal "4 to the County Assessor's valuation for;the year 1990., •claiming � grounds for relief thereunder.statingthe,'property'.described { • in such petition was assessed 'too high; as more specifically stated in said petition, ,and WHEREAS, said petitioner being represented -by"- North ' American Property Consultants who submitted a letter regarding said petition, and ' J WHEREAS, the 'Board has made its findings on the evidence,/ j testimony and remonstrances and is now fully , informed. 4 NOW, THEREFORE, SE IT RESOLVED. by -the, Board `of County Commissioners of Weld County, acting as -_the Board:> oP . " - ' Equalization, that the evidence• presented at the hearing clearly supported the value placed upon the .Petitioner.'s i property by the Weld County,Assessor. evidence indicated the value was reasonable,; equitable,' and,,derived.accordirig ;to .: • . the methodologies, :percentages,' ,figures' and formulas dietaidel to the Weld County Assessor.by law. . : As such, this Boardfinds that the'Petitioner` failed to meet its 'burden_'of proving that„ the Assessor's valuation';wab incorrect: " The' assessient`�and valuation_ of the weld Countrassessor,shall be, and hereby'•is, J •Rccrt\i- AUG 2 • C.1s0 P;t.ge RE: L. - FREEMAN JAMES F & STEVEN J BE IT FC'?THER RESOLVED that a denial of a petition, in whole or in p rt, by the Board of Equalization may be appealed ky seltnting 2ng of the following three options: 1• Board of. Assessment Appeals: You have the right to appeal the County Board of Equalization's (CBOE's) decision to the Board of Assessment Appeals (BAA) . Such hearing is the 1 Jinn hearing at' which testimony, exhibits or any other ' evidence may be, introduced. If to decision of the BAT, is further appealed to the Court of Appeals, only the record . created at the BAA hearing shall be the basis for the Court's decision. No new evidence can be introduced at the Court of Appeals. (39-8-108 (1) , CRS) Appeals to the BAA must be made on forms furnished by the BAA, and should be mailed or delivered within thirty (30) days of denial by the OBOE to: Board of Assessment Appeals 1313 Sheraan Street, Room 523 a Denver, ,CO 80203 k Phone: 866-S880 • F ly OR A 2. District Court: You 'have the right to appeal: the • j CBOE's decision to the District Court of the county wherein ' your property: is located.' ' ., New New testimony .exhibits or any other: 'evidence evidence . may be,, ,introduced at ,.;_the`,District ' Court ' hearing: .For.filing requirements please contact your attorney `S or the Clerk of the District Court. Further appeal of- the District Court's decision is made to the Court of Appeals for a review of the record. (39-8-108 (1) , CRS) OR 3• Binding Arbitration: You have the right to submit your case to arbitration.; If you choose this option the arbitrator's decision is „troll and your right to appeal your current' valuation ends. (39-8-108.5, CRS) Selecting the Arbitrator - In order to pursue arbitration, you must notify the OBOE of your intent. ,You and the CBOE ,select , an arbitrator 'from the official list of " qualified:people. If you ;cannot agree' on an arbitrator, the District Court of the county in which the property is located will make, the selection". ''Arbitration Hearing_ Procedur6 - Arbitration hearings are held within sixty days . from tho date the arbitrator is selected. Both you and the cBOE are entitled to participate. The hearings are informal. The'arbitrator 'has the authority VG Z 0�F4,..,,c.RFGENED �� f • • i t Page 3 RE: BOE - FREEMAN JAMES F & STEVEN J to issue subpoenas for witnesses, books, records, documents and other ovidence. He also has the power ,to •administer oaths, and all questions of law and fact shall be determined by him. The arbitration hearing may be confidential and closed to the public, ,.upon mutual agreement." The arbitrator's { written decision must be delivered to both parties personally or by registered mail within ten (10) days of the hearing. Such decision is gird and not subject to review. .Fees and Expenses - The arbitrator's fees and expenses are agreed upon by you and the CBOE. In the • case< of residential real property;,; such fees and expenses cannot_'. exceed $150.00 per case. The arbitrator's fees and expenses; not including counsel fees, are .to be paid as provided in the decision. The above and foregoing Resolution was,' on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following •vote on the nth , day of J '.y, A.D. .19 Or- ,_:, • , ATTEST: , : BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WE AUNTY, .COLORADO - . Weld County Clerk to the Board "',' ';F Gene R4 Br n err'Chairman °' . peputy Clerk to the Board e/xge Kennedy, Pro-Tee APP D AS TO FORM:/ ./ r� r�_K � /i_i<.ad �j onstance y r • County Attorney C. W. Kirby , / (EXCVSEDlW . Gordon'E. Lacy ti� R / \ 11510:11 STRICT �✓ 1 T :%a 3:2 - _ GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 PHONE.(303)356-1000 EXT.4256 191.1.� •,.. .�.. T„ :.7�.ss G - ... : ' ..L1i�19 :S 9 .':1 c:' COLORADO _ • 2a�.J V J1 (.M1C_LLY ed/I:ER J..M:5 EC. STZt CtI .� N A P Cz S:1C PAIhL i 09610oZZ5C01 PI;. R 2`•s70ZSo 't ./4C BRA 040 c GI:.::^:HCwL H. JLVD SUIT! A YZAA 1930 �av�Lau CG LO:is7 Gts/ :_j2 �90 The appraised value of property is based on the appropriate consideration of the approaches to value required by law,The Assessor has determined that your property should be included in the following category(ies): Residential property is valued by considering the cost and market approaches. —Agricultural land value is determined solely by the earning or production capacity of the land,capitalized at a rate set by law. _Producing mines are assessed at 25%of the gross proceeds or 100%of the net proceeds,whichever is greater. Oil and gas leaseholds and lands are assessed at 87,5% of the gross value of the oil and/or gas sold or transported from the premises on primary production;secondary production is valued at 75%. All other property,including vacant land,is valued by considering the cost,market,and income approaches. If your concern is the amount of your property tax, local taxing authorities (county, city, fire protection, and other special districts) hold budget hearings in the fall,Please refer to your tax bill or ask your Assessor for a listing of these districts,and plan to attend these budget hearings. The Assessor has carefully studied all available information, giving particular attention to the specifics included on your protest and has deter- mined the valuation(s) assigned to your property.The reasons for this determination of value are: Hr:VZ CO:RECTL:ii MINOR ::f2k3et IN THE DZSCRIPTION OF ThIC: PRJPERTY. Ir Trr E-GE ITCi1;, AFFZCT YOUR VALUATION, Test' crIANGk5 AR. kt_FL_GTCo ON THIS FORM. IF YOU HAVE FL;iTHLR QUESTIONS„ ON THG,;C .n2w VALu :3 PLCASI CALL. • • STIONER'S ASSESSOR'S VALUATION PR OPERTV CLASSIFICATION ESTIMATE ACTUAL VALUE ACTUAL VALUE OF VALUE PRIOR TO REVIEW AFTER REVIEW LANw 24, aoa 24st.oU It1P5 4711.42 44, 019 I • - - TOTALS S - S 72} 320 S 09r2s% If you disagree with the Assessor's decision,you have the right to appeal to the County Board of Equalization for further consideration, 33--S-103(1)(0),C.F.S. Please see the back of this form for detailed information on filing your appeal, _ RICHARD W. hEIRL1ES By: n /DATG WELD COUNTY ASSESSOR 4 FomFPA-207 r87/90 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON REVERSE SIDE • i PETITION TO THE STATE BOARD CF ASSESSMENT APPEALS Date: August 28 , 1990 TO THE HONORABLE BOARD OF ASSESSMENT APPEALS: Your Petitioner, Jim/Steve Freeman (name of property owner) Hwv 85 — CO (Street address, City, State, Zip Code of subject property) hereby appeals the decision of the (check: one) X County Board of Equalization _County Board of Commissioners _Property Tar; Administrator for property located in the County of Weld that was dated August 17, 1990, concerning (check one) X Valuation Refund _Exemption _Abatement ' for the year (s) 1990. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: (Legal description — if multi43e properties aro involved in the one decision being appealed, a listing of the county schedule or parcel numbers with the corresponding properties — must be submitted as an attachment to the petition) PARCEL #09b131402002/PIN R 404908b PROPERTY CLASSIFICATION: This property is classified as: (Please check: one) _Commercial _Residential L. Vacant land _Industrial Agricultural Natural Resources Producing Mines Oil and Gas State Assessed _Exempt 4 ATTACHMENTS 'TO THIS `PETITION FORM: (Please . check off the attachments yoU will be using): . , X" Thc :decision (County'Board of Equalization, - County .Bovnrd >o! is Commissioners, or property Tax Administrator) that is being ;appealed. This attachment MUST be with the petition in order for it to. be accepted for docketing. X The Assessor '_ Notice of Denial . X The facts and law (the issue (s) involved) , on which this appeal is based. C.R.S 39-8-108 (1) X "'List': of witnesses and exhibits to be used at the hearing, (Per FAA Rule 11 To be determined) X Exhibits, if any, to be used at the hearing. (Per BAA, Rule 11 To be determined) _ ESTIMATED, TIME FOR PETITIONER TO PRESENT THE APPEAL: _. 60 'minutes or 1 hours REPRESENTATION: (Please check appropriate .responws) Petieioner' W Will -b `present- at the hearing, or " Petitioner requests that: thr_ Board rule' orb the documentation si�bmztted;: retitianer will be represented by a Oalerado, Attorney X yes,ono. , #1368 • page 1 of s. - • • • ;1ak;o five (r) copies of this petition form with all r attachments and exhibits. The original (with original signature) : plus three entire copies (a total of four (4) ) are to be filed 4 .,with the Board of Assessment Appear; one entire copy to be filed with the Respondent (County Board of Equalization, County 3 Commissioners or Property Tax Administrator) as shown in Certificate of Service; and one entire copy to be kept for Petitioner 's records. r a CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 1 I certify to the Board of Assessment Appeals that I have mailed (or hand delivered) one copy of this petition form, together with all attachments and exhibits, to the Weld _ ( indicate one) County Board of Equalization, County Board of , Commissioners, or property Tax Administrator in Greeley 7 Colorado, on August 29, 1990. 1 1 • n� r k� jl Juli Greni Petitioner 's signature Attorney for Pe itioner Reg. No. 15025 640 E. Eisenhower Blvd. Petit'ioner 's mailing address Suite A • ` Loveland, Colorado 80537 (303) 667-8962 • Petitioner 's Telephone No. 4 • 'N. _ - Q1368 page 2 of 2 f Ir ees. 2 J �q a RESOLU'T'ION . , •. RE: THE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, 1990, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PETITION OF: FREEMAN STEVE '& JIM 342 S 6ST .) LA SALLE, CO 80645 DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: PIN r�w ARCEL: 096131402002 - LAS 11676 L6-7 BLK15 MC CUTCHEONS 2ND , • WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, organized as a Board of Equalization for the purpose of adjusting, equalizing, raising or lowering the assessment A and valuation of real and personal property within this .' County, fixed and made by -the County Assessor for the 'year 1990, and i WHEREAS, said petitionhas been heard before the County. Assessor and due notice of adjustment thereon has been given to the taxpayer(s) , and -WHEREAS, the taxpayer(s) presented a •petition ofyappeal to the County Assessor's valuation for the year,1990,'<claiming '; grounds:.for• relief<thereunder stating" the"-property described` in such petition was assessed too high; as-more specifically stated: in:said petition; :and •;: . :;a;r s WHEREAS,, said petitioner being represented .by : North _ American Property Consultants who submitted a letter regarding " said petition, and • WHEREAS, the Board has made its findings on the evidence, testimony and remonstrances and is now fully informed. •.. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT.-RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, acting ; as the ' Board :of Equalization, that the evidence presented at the hearing clearly„supported the , value placed upon - the Petitioner's _ property by the Weld County.Assessor: - Such evidence indicated the value was reasonable, equitable, and derived:accordinq ,to the methodologies, percentages, figures and.:formulas dictated'_. ' to the'We1d County Assessor bylaw -''As such'this Board. findth that the "Petitioner faileCto .meet'•its'.burdo of provirig,tHat the Assessor's..valuation was incorrect.., The .assessment- and valuation;of the weld County Asse`b?4 shall be,- and hereby is, affirmed: _ - ti,.. BE IT 0 whole or in part, by the Board of ,Equalization_may be appeal�z,na. 0 ? 1 F h by selecting one of the following three options: •e VDU 'RkSCC- „. • Page 2 RE: BOE - FREEMAN STEVE & JIM 1. Board Of Assessment Appeals: You have the right to appeal the County Board of Equalization's (CBOE's) decision to the Board of Assessment Appeals (BAA) . Such hearing'is"the r final hearing at which testimony, exhibits or any "other evidence may be introduced. If the decision of the BAA is further appealed to the Court of Appeals, only the record created at the BAA hearing shall be the basis for the Court's decision. No new evidence can be introduced at the Court of Appeals. (39-8-108(1) , CRS) Appeals to the BAA must be made on forms furnished by the BAA, and should be mailed or delivered within thirty (30) days of denial by the CBOE to: Board of Assessment Appeals 1313 Sherman Street, Room 523 Denver, CO 80203 a Phone: 866-5880 • OR e 2. District Court: You have the right to appeal the CBOE's decision to the District Court of the county wherein ` your property is located. New testimony, exhibits :'or any.. V , '{ other evidence may be introduced at the ' District. .Court hearing. For filing requirements please contact your'attorney , .< K: or the Clerk of the District Court. • Further appeal •of ,the u District Court's decision •is made to the Court of Appeals tor 4k14. a review of the record. (39-8-108(1) , CRS) OR 3. Binding' grbitration: You have the right to submit your case to arbitration. If you choose . this options-he`, arbitrator's decision is final and yyour, right to appeal :your , current valuation ends. (39-8-108.5, CRS) q_elecrting the Arbitrator - " In order, to :pursue ' arbitration, you must notify the OBOE of your intent.' 'Youand the CBOE select an arbitrator from'. the official:. list of qualified people: If you cannot agree on an arbitrator;'the , District Court of the county in which the property is located • will make the selection. '. - Artzitrattpn Bearing Procedure - Arbitration`hearings • are held within sixty days from the date the arbitrator is. selected. Both you and the CBOE are entitled to participate.' The hearings are informal. The arbitrator has the authority C'el • Page 3 RE: BOE - FREEMAN STEVE & JIM to issue subpoenas for witnesses, books, records, documents and other evidence. He also has the power to administer oaths, and all questions of law and fact shall be determined by him. The arbitration hearing may be confidential and closed to the public, upon mutual agreement. The arbitrator's written decision must be delivered to both parties personally or by registered mail within ten (10) days of the hearing. Such decision is Sinai and not subject to review. Fees and Expenses - The arbitrator's fees and expenses are agreed upon by you and the CBOE. In the case of residential real property, such .fees and expenses cannot exceed 5150.00 per case. The arbitrator's fees and expenses,' not including counsel fees, are to be paid as provided in the decision. The above and foregoing Resolution was,- on motion"' duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 27th day of J y, A.D. 19 0.' G/4ATTEST: BOARD F COUNTY COMMISSIONERS •' WELD TY,' COLORADO" Weld County' Clerk t the Board A ,, ene R. B ntnn r irman+ w • 07X`1K*s i eputy Clerk t the Board . eorgG a Kennedy, Pro Tem . �PpRO,D AS TO FORM: Constance L. liar ert •l ounty Attorney C. W. Kirby r (EXCUSED)" Gordon E. Lacy t�UG 2 0 'tS3 i.-,; FiCt Jr CU1,\ii 1-�- xit� 91S 10th STREET i - -=� N07ICL° OP' DENIHL 131/l5 - GREGLeY,COLORnDO50631 C PHONE(703)356-1000 EXT.4:56 a5 .f•;. it., '�I� LAS 11676 L6-7 DLKI5 MC CUTCHCON5 2ND w a re., ur+ ' 17 i7 I4� ��,©J. COLORADO 01:NER FREEMAN,-SYCVE, C. JIM • N.A.P.C. - -PARCEL "096131402002 . -, , PIN - R 4049086 640 E. EISENHOWER YEAR 1990 LOVELAND CO (10537 LOG 00844 06/12/1990 The appraised value of property is based on the appropriate consideration of the approaches to value required by law.The Assessor has determined that your property should be included in the following category(ies): ' Residential property is valued by considering the cost and market approaches. _Agricultural land value is determined solely by the earning or production capacity of the land,capitalized at a rate set by law, _Producing mines are assessed at 25%of the gross proceeds or 100%of the net proceeds,whichever is greater. Oil and gas leaseholds and lands are assessed at 87.5% of the gross value of the oil and/or gas sold or transported from the premises on • primary production;secondary production is valued at 75%, All other property,including vacant land,is valued by considering the cost,market,and income approaches. . If your concern is the amount of your property tax, local taxing authorities (county,city, fire protection, and other special districts) hold budget hearings in the fall.Please refer to your tax bill or ask your Assessor for a listing of these districts,and plan to attend these budget hearings. ' The Assessor has carefully studiiepd all available information, giving particular attention to the specifics included on your protest and has deter- mined NU Lei ACClE rii-10 tl>=LN ypur pflop4.rcy'TU rl (Itstit.i 15A L.ter�IAr'atlolLof rare: a Ut ars. MIS PROPERTY. COLORADO LAN REQUIRES US TO SEND THIS NOTICE OF DENIAL FOR ALL PROPERTIES ON , WHICH WE DO NOT ADJUST THE VALUE. - PETITIONER'S ASSESSOR'S VALUATION PROPERTY CLASSIFICATION ESTIMATE OF VALUE ACTUAL VALUE ACTUAL VALUE - ACTUAL TO REVIEW AFTER REVIEW LAND 122730 122730 IMPS . TOTALS S $ 122 iau .S• 122 aril _ t If you disagree with the Assessor's decision,you have the right to appeal to the County board of Equalization for further consideration, 3^-P.-100(1)(x),C.R.S. Please see the back of this form for detailed information on filing your appeal e/: RICHARD W: KEIR1\ES 06/19/10 • _, . WELD COUNTY ASSESSOR • DATE " non 25 15.OPT•AO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON REVERSE SlRECEIVED JUN 2 2 'IJ3u oft roam YF:07 cueO A I PETITION TO T:-i7 STATE 20A RD CF ASSESSMENT APPEALS Date:_Au$ust 28 , 1990 , _TO THZ HONORABLE BOARD OF ASSESSMENT AP'P'EALS: Your (='etitioner, Jim/Steve Freeman I (name of property owner) 1 Hwy 3S — . CO (Street address, City, State, Zip Code of subject property) hereby appeals the decision of the (chock_ one) X County Board of Equalization County 8oar•d of Commissioners i Property Tax Administrator li for property located in the County of weld _ k that was dated August 17. 1990_, concernins (check: one) X Valuation ^Refund Exemption Abatement for the year (5) 1990. i' DESCRIPTION OF P'ROP'ERTY: (Legal description - if multiple properties are involved in the ono decision being appealed, a listing of the county schedule or parcel numbers with the corresponding properties - must be submitted was an attachment to - the ,petition) PARCEL 410961314O2003/PIN R 4049186 • . PROPERTY CLASSIFICATION: This property is classified as: , (Please check: one) X Commercial Residential Vac<<nt land Industrial • •. 4 Agricultural Natural Resources r.'roducing Minos' ' Oil. and Gas State Assessed Exempt . 71! AYTACHMENTS TO THIS PETITION FORM: (Please check off the . attachments you will .be usins) - ,-. '- • X The- decision (County Board .af- Equalization,- County Board ....;'..o4 .;. Commissioners, or Property Tax Administrator) that is .- being ��" appealed. +;. •,, This attachment MUST be with the k:. petition in order for it to be ,:i; accepted for docketing. ..i. . I,y X The Assessor 's Notice of Denial . s:Y X �.) involved) , on which this The facts and law (the issue(s) , _. L ' appeal is based. C.R.S 39-8-108 (I) � ' «Y List of witnesses. and .exhibits to bo- used at the hoarins. (Per. PAA Rule 11 To be determined) �* X Exhibits,5 i is i f ,an ^• - r —.�. , y, �b be used at the hearins. •• -1•"r(For SAA Rule 11 To be determined) . ! N. ESTIMATED TIME FOR P'ETI'TIONER TO PRESENT THE APPEAL: - • '��• ..:,; _ 60 minutes a:' ...__ I __:_hours �.s �,,;, I,EFKESENT,ATIOhI: (F'le��se :cr'aeck A rd r^ia�e '" P? P respensos) • !•.. Petitioner will .be .presenL 'at the. hearxn9, •'or.' J 'Pet�i ioher. requests. that the' Board rule. on thc• documentation - `ubmi tted. '. -. '1 ;-.4: _ • ,•• cpre.,cnted i by .a Co.oraGo Attorney • , ycs:,, nn. r' #13.68 • ' ;•: page ,l f k'•` r 4 • .. 4:.:. - �'. :'i t - • IT a, ; make five (5) copies of this petition -form with all 'r attachment:; and exhibit. The original (with original signature) plus three entire copies (a total of four (4) ) are to be filed ;� %with the Board of Assessment Appeals; one entire copy to be filed q,, with the Respondent (County Board of Equalization, County ;j Commissioner;, or Property Tax Administrator) as shown in • Certificate of Service; and one entire copy to be kept for 'e.titioner's records. ;! .% N CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify toNthe Board of Assessment Appeals that I have ., mailed (or hand delivered) one copy of this petition form, toGe.4ther with all attachments and exhibits, to the Weld . (indicate one) County Board of Equalization, County E:oard of Commiszionor's, or Property Tax Administrator in Greeley Colorado, on Au3ust 29, 1990. .:• iZ Cm.) \1 A • h Jul a Greni P'etitioner 's signature ., Attorney for •ititioner i. Reg. No. 15025 . 640 E. Eisenhower Blvd. Petitioner 's mailing addrea� r; Suite A i.ovelapd, Colorado 8057.7 . 4 (x03) 667-89622 S! - r 1;' Petitioner 's Telephone No. h t. k( . 4; Y•. Y' s .. _. ..... .... _ _ _ . . ... ..•. _ .. . V. f .R • 'r re. , . . • • �.•K . �. . a, . _ . '? • . y , . - .b. • • .. - 4• r: F .. - • : .. . • . 1363 page 2 of . , # 136 IkESOLUTIOK RE: THE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, 1990, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PETITION OF: FREEMAN STEVE & JIM 1 342 S 6ST LA SALLE, CO 80645 I i DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: PIN � �ARCEL: 096131402003 - LAS 11677 L8 THRU 11 BLK15 mC�"'CU2tCHEONS 2ND EXC SELY 18' L11 HWY R/W%203 5 AV% WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, organized as a Board of Equalization for the purpose of adjusting, equalizing, raising or lowering .the .assessment and valuation of real and personal property within this ' County, fixed and made by the County Assessor for the year 1990, and WHEREAS, said petition has been heard before the County ` Assessor and due notice of adjustment thereon has been given to the taxpayer(s) , and • WHEREAS, the taxpayer(s) presented a petition of,appeal to the County.Assessor's valuation for. the year 1990, claiming grounds for relief thereunder stating the, property._;described •• ' in� such'petition Was assessed too high, as ,more specifically - stated in said, petition, and WHEREAS, said petitioner being represented by,. North. "` American 'Property Consultants who submitted a letter regarding said petition, and WHEREAS, the Board has made its findings on the evidence, • testimony and remonstrances and is nor fully informed. _ NOW,' THEREFORE,:. BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of -County - - - Commissioners of Weld County, acting as the Board ' of Equalization, that the evidence presented at , the hearing ' clearly supported the value placed upon the Petitioner's property by the Weld County Assessor. Such evidence indicated' • . the value was reasonable,Hequitable, and derived 'according to , , the .Methodologies, 'percentages, figures 'and formulas dictated ' .-- to'the Weld County Assessor by law. As such, this Board;finds that the Petitioner'failed-to meet its burden of proving-that , the` Assessor's valuation'was,,,ineorreet: The assessment and. - valuetion"of the Weld County Assessor shall be, and heroby is, ax a i:'med.. • {c,o0 . . S A1JG 2. EC wsu � " • 1 Page 2 RE: BOE - FREEMAN STEVE & JIM BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a denial of a petition, ,in whole or in part, by the Board of Equalization may be appealed by selecting Ana of the following three options: 1. $oard of Assessment' Ackeals: You have the right: to appeal the County Board of, Equalization's (CBOE's) ' decision to the Board of Assessment Appeals (BAA) . . Such hearing is .the ,finks hearing at :which testimony, -exhibits or any .other evidence may be introduced. If the decision of the BAA;-is further appealed to , the ;Court of Appeals, qn).v the record created at the BAA hearing shall be the basis for the Court's ' decision. No new evidence can be introduced at the Court of Appeals. (39-8-108(1) , CRS) Appeals to the BAA must be made on forms furrished by the BAA, and should be mailed or delivered within-thirty (30). days of denial by the CBOE to:. • Board of Assessment Appeals 1313 Sherman Street, Room 523 Denver ' CO . 80203 ,,, - r Phone:- 866-5880 2. District Court , You, have the right to appeal, ,the CBOE's; decision-,to, the•pistrict Court, of: the county wherein " your property ; is located'. ' New, testimony,-::'.'exhibits or, any . other „evidence may .be:',introduced •;at .,tha ,District, _C.ourt, ': hearing. „Tor filing requirements please contactyouur attorney • or- the Clerk:of. the District rCourt. ',;:Further appeal ,of..:the, District Court's decision is made to the. Court of Appeals-for - a review of the record. (39-8-108(1) , CRS) • OR 3. Dinding Arbitration: You have the right to submit your ,case to arbitration. If you choose: this " option „the_ arbitrator's decision,is final and your: right. to appeal your current valuation ends.'; (39-8-108.5,• CRS) Selecting the " Arbitrator. In order to pursue arbitration, you must notify the CBOE of your intent. You*and . the CBOE ;select an -arbitrator, from',' the;:.-official list.:-of qualified'.people., If'you, cannot agree on" an arbitrator,; the District Court of .the.county in which the property is located will- make the selection: • Arbitration Hearing Procedure - Arbitration hearings are held within -sixty days from the date. the arbitrator ,is selected. ' Both you and the CBOE are entitled„to participate. The hearings are informal The- arbitrator has the authority • Page 3 RE: BOE - FREEMAN STEVE & JIM to issue subpoenas for witnesses, books, records, documents and other evidence. He ' also has ' the power to administer oaths, and all questions: of law and fact 'shall` be determined by him: The arbitration hearing may be confidential and closed to the public, upon mutual agreement. The arbitrator's written decision must be delivered to both parties personally or by registered mail within ten (10) days of the hearing. Such decision is linal and not subject to review. , Fees and F_n-n. P The arbitrator's fees and ,expenses are agreed upon by you and the , CBOE. ` = In the case of j residential real property,' such , fees and expenses_ cannot , exceed $150.00 per case. The arbitrator's fees and expenses,- not including counsel fees, are to be paid as provided in the decision. t The above and foregoing Resolution was, on-motion duly made and seconded, adopted by ,the following vote on the 27t11 i day of J jly, .A.D ,- 19 O. ATTEST: • 1/a BOARD OF COUNl'X COMMISSIONERS :} ii/vvv�✓.6 WEL UNTY :;Cn RADA: _ weld County Clerk to the Board /6` —• . J `t Gene zR Brantner, Chairman 1 , puty clerk to a Board ��!'r�--7�- Ge g- a Kennedy, Pro-Tem Ji D AS TO FORM: Constance L. Harbert �1�At/ f T aunty torney �_ C �K�KL Irby Gordon E:- Lacy • . ,� � sae t k.CC --\ / , G:;ICS OI 1/4CCST5 v 913 10th STREET 1 (A ORLELEl',COLORADO 80631 11CTICC OF DENIAL l PHONE 1303;356-1000. EXT.-736 f,2�>enzn i410.IV N.LAS 11677 L8 TRU 11 SLKIS MC CUTCn_ON S 2:10 I 1 r G? �© ' EXC SaLY 181 L11 els4Y R/::1/2203 5 AV's COLORADO 203 s AV LA SALL OUNER . FREEMAN STEVE L JIM N.A.P.C. PARCEL 090131402003 PIN R 4049166 640 C. EISENHOWER YEAR 1990 LOVELAND CO 80537 LOG 00845 06/1Z/1990 The appraised value of property is based on the appropriate consideration of the approaches to value required by law,The Assessor has determined T that your property should be included in the following category(ies)' i _Residential property is valued by considering the cost and market approaches. ; -Agricultural land value is determined solely by the earning or production capacity of the land,capitalized at a rate set by law. Producing mines are assessed at 25%of the gross proceeds or 100%of the net proceeds,whichever is greater. , -Oil and gas leaseholds and lands are assessed at 87,5% of the gross value of the oil and/or gas sold or transported from the premises on • primary production;secondary production is valued at 75%. -All other property, including vacant land,is valued by considering the cost,market,and income approaches. • If your concern is the amount of your property tax, local taxing authorities (county,city, fire protection, and other special districts) hold budget hearings in the fall. Please refer to your tax bill or ask your Assessor for a listing of these districts,and plan to attend these budget hearings. • The Assessor has carefully studied all available information, giving particular attention to the specifics included on your protest and has deter. ' mined the valuation(s) assigned to your property.The reasons for this determination of value aro: 1 WE HAVE REVIEWED YOUR. PROPERTY VALUE AND IT IS CORRECT. STATE LAW REgUIRES THAT 1987/1988 COST; MARKET AND INCOME INFORMATION DE USED TO ESTABLISH CURRENT VALUES. • I PETITIONER'S ASSESSOR'S VALUATION •PROPERTY CLASSIFICATION ESTIMATE ACTUAL VALUE I ACTUAL VALUE OF VALUE PRIOR TO REVIEW -.AFTER REVIEW -' - --� I LAND 31a920 31a920 ; Ii:PS 200;211 200a211 • TOTALS S S ?321,131 S 232, 131 If you disugrce with the Assessor's decision,you have the right to appeal to the County Board of Equalization for further consideration, 29-C,103(1)(a),C.R.S. Please see the back of this form for detailed information on filing your appeal, - Ey. RICHARD W. P.EIRNES � 0y/2o/vo WELD COUNTY ASSESSOR DATE 10 `s,orOF 07 67/00 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON REVERSER�EE(1�E� ��'��. Z 5 lvid �>i�! 'r I • I . 1 1 a PETITICN TC THE STATE BOARD OF ASSESSMENT AP:=EAL. I .1 Date: Augu;t 28 , 1990 :� A • TO THE HONORABLE BOARD OF ASSESSMENT APPEALS: .0 Your Petitioner, Freeman Truck Bodies (name of property owner) Hwy B5 — Ls Salle. CO B064; 70 (Street address, City, State, Zip Code of subject property) hereby appeals the decision of the (chock one) X County Board of Equalization County Board of Commissioners Property Tax Administrator , for property located in the County of Weld j that was dated August 17, 1994, concerning (check one) ;: X Valuation Refund Exemption Abatement A for the year (.4).4) 1990. DESCRIPTION CF PROPERTY: (Legal description - if multiple properties are involved in the one decision being appealed, a '� listing of the county schedule or parcel numbers with the 3 corresponding properties - must be submitted as an attachment to the petition) PARCEL #096131403007/PIN. R X4050396 - . • :4 _ PROPERTY CLASSIFICATION: ' This -property - is' classified 'mss: .`� (Please check one) X Commercial Residential .. ._ -' Vacant land -Industrial • • . ' Agricultural ;_wNatural Resourees: Producing Mines - • '�. Oil and Gas State Assessed .-- - -- Exempt • 4• ATTACHMENTS TO THIS PETITION :FORM:::; <Pfease- cheek ofFf. 'the • ' .attachments 'you will •be. :using' .1", . ,.,� ..4 11: X Thar decision {County Boardpf Equalizatiorii County •Board of• . .-; . • ,` Commissioners, or Property Tax-Administrator) that'" is 'being appealed. This .attachment MUST be with the petition in order for it to bey ;- accepted for dodketins. ,. X The Assessor 's Notice of Denial'.' - . • X The facts and law (the issue(s) involved) , on which this ;`- app��ai is bawd. C.R.S 39-S-108 (_1) •- --. - - X List or' witnes•se;s. and eXFiibl to be::used at -the' , heariri.. ` .'._�� (Per BAA Rule 11 To be determined> - . X Exhibits, if any, to be used wit`.tiwe•:•hearing (Per BAA Rule 11 To be determined) 'a a. • ti ESTIMATED TIME FON PETITIONER' TW.P ESENT•. THE• APPEAL:. . ' ¢O minutes or • . 1 :hours ..,•. ... _ r. f LPAESENTATION: • (r'lease' chQGk"•aitp prop riiate•"rosponsCa) - .. • Pc t i t ia'rser• b.+ . .r sail `'. � _ h '+� �" . ' r: •••••.-.y.,:17::•,•'-'?. .- . - will e P t. at t �"';iear.in'g; 'o • Petitioner:. requests that':the•;.,BOaro• rul.e.'on7.',Vie• locum.entat ion . ' . : -,', submi t tart).• `', . Petitioner ,wi l 1 be r eprosentoid by: a Colorado:Attorney _. - Make five (5) copies of this petition form with a'_ : attachments and exhibits. The original (with original signature) plus throe entire copies (a total of four (4) ) are to be filed ..with the Board of Assessment Appeals; one entire copy to be filed with the Respondent (County Board of Equalization, County Commissioners or Property Tax Administrator) as shown in Certificate of Service; and one entire copy to be kept for Petitioner 's records. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE certify to Nthe Board of Assessment Appeals that I have mailed (or hand delivered) one copy of this petition form, together with all attachments and exhibits, to the Weld ( indicate one) County Board of Equalization, County Board of Commissioners, or Property Tax Administrator in Greeley Colorado, on August 29, 1990. Jule Greni / Petitioner's signature • Attorney for pletitioner Reg. No. 15025 640 E. Eisenhower 81vd. Petitioner 's mailing address Suite A Loveland, Colorado 805.=7 (30.1) 667-8968 • . Petitioner 's' Telephone No. • 1;:.68 page 2 o4 2 ,....�� lb 1 0 j 1 RESOLUTION I. i RE: THE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, 1990, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PETITION OF: FREEMAN TRUCK BODIES INC • % MARSHALL FREEMAN t� 427. 2 ST .. 1 LA SALLE, CO ; 80645. • �. r-�-• " '4•y�"' ; ' sM' DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: PIN ' ARCEL: 096131403007 - LAS 11673 L15 THRU 18 BLK13 C CUT S 2ND EXC SELY 18' L18 HWY R/W P WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of weld County, i Colorado, organized as a Board of Equalization for the purpose + of adjusting,'_, equalizing, raising or lowering the assessment and valuation of real and personal property within this County, fixed and made by the County Assessor for,the year 1990, and WHEREAS,. said petition has been heard before the County • I Assessor;.and due notice, of adjustment thereon has been given i to the taxpayer(s) , and f WHEREAS, . the taxpayer(s) presented a petition, of_•appeal to the County Assessor's, valuations for.;the, year 1990,• claiming 1 ", grounds for relief thereunder stating,the'property;described , inysuchapetition: was assessed too high, as„ more specifically y " statedaizi 'said petition,° and - WHEREAS, ` said petitioner being represented by : North' 1 American Property Consultants who submitted,a letter regarding said ii , petition, and WHEREAS, the Board.has made its findings on the evidence, testimony and remonstrances and is now fully informed. NOW, ,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of- County Commissioners of Weld County, .'acting as the Board of I Equalization; that the evidence presented' at. the hearing . clearly supported the :value placed ,upon',,the . Petitioner's: property.;by,'the.We2d,County•Assessor. Such revidence: indicated the,value was reasonable,/equitable,:and derived- according;to I the methodologies percentages, figures and formulas::dictated to the Weld, County'Assessor.by;law., As,.:such,., this Board finds' , that the ,Petitioner failed to meet its burden of proving that 4. the Assessor's valuation"was' incorrect. The assesSment_ and valuation•of:the Weld County isttless6r shall •be,,and hereby ,is-, µ �G Gib'�G �t1G Z u 1°� r' Page 2 RE: BOE - FREEMAN TRUCK BODI£5 INC • BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a denial of a petition, in whole or in part, by the Board of Equalization may be appealed by selecting one of the following three options: • 1. Board of Assessment Appeals You have the right to appeal the County Board of Equalization's (CBOE's) decision to the Board of Assessment Appeals (BAA) . Such hearing is the final hearing at which testimony", exhibits or any other evidence may be introduced. • If the decision of the BAA •is further appealed to the Court of Appeals, only the record created at the BAA hearing shall be the basis for the Court's decision. No new evidence can be introduced at the Court of Appeals. (39-8-108(1) , CRS) Appeals to the BAA must be made on forms furnished by the BAA, and should be mailed or delivered within thirty (30) i days of denial by the CB^E to: Y Board of Assessment Appeals 1313 Sherman Street, Room 523 • ` Denver, CO 80203 , , Phone: 866-5880 OR 2. District Court: You have the " right.to `.appeal' the it CBOE's decision to the:.District :Court,.of .the county wherein; C, your, property is located. ' New.,testimony, 'exhibits or`.any. other . evidence . may: be „ introduced4"at;' the °District ^court ' 't hearing. %For, filing requirements;please,:contact your; attorney or the -Clerk of the District Court •`'- Further;appeal of the District Court's decision is made to the Court of Appeals for a review of the record. (39-8-108(1), CRS) OR • 3 Binding Arbitration: You have;" the right to submit your case to arbitration._ _ If you :choose this option the arbitrator's decision is final, and your 'right to appeal your current valuation ends. (39-8-108.5, CRS) SeleCt�na tpg Arbitrator In order' to pursue arbitration, you must notify the OBOE of your intent. You and the CBOE -select an arbitrator :from' t• he :official li^.t.,of ' qualified people. If you 'cannot'agree .on an arbitrator, the, District Court of the county in which the property is located will make the selection: Arbitratipp Hear}na ProceduYe -..Arbitration hearings are held within sixty days from the date the arbitrator is selected. < Both you and the CBOE are,entitled to participate. The hearincs arc informal.. The arbitrator .has the authority, RAC WED i4\414-"' ? CI) i�. Page 3 RE: BOE - FREEMAN TRUCK BODIES INC to issue subpoenas for witnesses, books, records, documents and other evidence. He also has the power to administer oaths, and all questions of law and fact shall be determined by him. The arbitration hearing may be confidential and closed to the . public, upon mutual agreement. The arbitrator's written'decision must be delivered to both parties personally or by registered mail within ten (10) days of the hearing. Such decision is :St and not subject to review. Fees and ExBQnses - The arbitrator's fees and expenses are agreed upon by you and the CBOE. In the case of . residential real property, such fees and expenses cannot exceed $150.00 per case.,> The arbitrator's fees and expenses; not including counsel fees, are to be paid as provided in the decision. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the ?.7th day of ,7 y, A.D. 19. 0. ATTEST: / �G/ < , BOARD OF.COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WE LINTY, CO DO_, Weld County Clerk to the Board • • ene R.Br ntn r, • Chairman , 471i-?X-4:0/ y leputy:Clerk to he Board : . z —_ ' / George Kennedy, Pro-Tem AP D AS TO FORM: /1-2 te e��r� 4,)417-e—a-i Constance L. Harbert /(// Y, 1,/ County Attorney C. w. Kirby/ • (EXCUSED) Gordon E. Lacy .. •• � sir(:�:;G �-:GL>i: ,U5i-aaG.; ‘C6 915 :Jth STREET _ sp GREELEY,COLORADO -- NOTICE OF DENIAL �� PHONE(303) EST.4:f ^y4 n LAS 11077 L1S 7Y,R:J 18 DLs:13 t"C CU7Ct1E3N5 2Va k;::; ,i � ESC SELY 131 Ll t, H.AY aiN C DRADO • 427 2 ST LA SALL OWNER FREEMAN TRUCK BODIES INC N.A.P.C. PARCEL 096131403007 PIN R 4050306 , 640 E. EISENHOWER YEAR 1990 LOVELAND CO 60537 EGO 00846 0o/12/1990 The appraised value of property is based on the appropriate consideration of the approaches to value required by law.The Assessor has determined that your property should be included in the following category(ies): I -Residential property is valued by considering the cost and market approaches. Agricultural land value is determined solely by the earning or production capacity of the land,capitalized at a rate set by law. Producing mines are assessed at 25°;)of the gross proceeds or 100%of the net proceeds,whichever is greater. -Oil and gas leaseholds and lands are assessed at 87,5% of the gross value of the oil and/or gas sold or transported from the premises on primary production;secondary production is valued at 75%. -All other property,including vacant land,is valued by considering the cost,market,and income approaches, If your concern is the amount of your property tax, local taxing authorities (county, city, fire protection, and other special districts) hold budget hearings in the fall.Please refer to your tax bill or ask your Assessor for a listing of these districts,and plan to attend these budget hearings. The Assessor has carefully studied all available information, giving particular attention to the specifics included on your protest and has deter• mined the valuation(s)assigned to your property. The reasons for this determination of value are: 110 CHANCE HAS DE214 MADE TO THE ACTUAL VALUATION OF THIS PROPERTY. COLORADO LAW REQUIRES US TO SEND THIS NOTICE OF DENIAL FOR ALL PROPERTIES ON WHICH s1E DO NOT ADJUST THE VALUE. PETITIONER'S ' ASSESSOR'S VALUATION PROPERTY CLASSIFICATION ESTIMATE ACTUAL VALUE I ACTUAL VALUE OF VALUE PRIOR TO REVIEW AFTER REVIEW LAND 31,920 313920 , I PIP 5 18)992 992 10'992 TOTALS S S .50_,912 S SOa 912 If you d agree with the Assessor's decision,you have the right to appeal to the County Board of Equalization for further consideration, ?2•SIMI)(a),C.R.S. Please see the back of this form for detailed information on filing your appeal ev: RICHARD V'. I�EIRNES oc12.3)-9a • WELD COUNTY ASSF.SSOR 17 �EiVtOTJUN 2 5 SSS 14 Form P Fr R:oiev r0 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON REVERSE S( e' �Ll • 1 . PETITION TO THE STATE BOARD DE ASSESSMENT APPEALS ;, Date: August 28 1990 • TO THE HONORABLE BOARD GF ASSESSMENT APPEALS: • Your Petitioner, Jim/Steve Freeman - (name of property owner) ;. 427 N 2 St. - LaSalle, CO 80648 _ (Street address, City, State, Zip Code of sebject property) e r eey appeals the decision of the (check one) X County Board of Equalization County Board of Commissioners e Property Tax Administrator for property located in the County of Weld that was dated August 17, 1990, concerning (check one) • X Valuation Refund Exemption Abatement r for the year (s) 1990. P. I DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: (Lesal description - if multiple properties are involved in the one decision being appealed, a v listine of the county schedule or parcel numbers with the corresponding properties - must be aubmitted :as an attachment to 4, the petition) PARCEL *096131403008/PIN R 40.,,0486 • PROPERTY CLASSIFICATION: This property is classified.: . as: i• (Please check ono) e X Commercial Residential Vacant land Industrial L Agricultural Natural Resources Producing Minos Oil and Gres State Assessed Exempt . . i ATTACHMENTS TO THIS PETITION FORM: (Please check off. the attachments you will be using). :, X The decision (County Board of EqualixatiOni County Board of -1t; Commissioners, or Property Tax Administrator) that is ' being r; appealed. ' This attachment MUST be with the petition in order for it to be accepted for docketing. X The Assessor's Notice of Denial . X They facts and law (the issue(Ks) involved) , on which this appc•e1 is based. C.R.S 39-8-108 (1) . X List of - witnesses and exhibits to be used at the hearing::'-7_7--.— _+. (Per BAA Rule 11 To be determined) X Exhibits, if any, to be used at the hearing. •... • • ' (Per BAA Rule 11 To be determined) - ._ . . .+ y.. ESTIMATED TIME FOR PETITIONER TO PRESENT THE APPEAL: - : 60 minutes or- - 1 haur's . - , . . e_,e-4, 4 • REPRESENTATION: (Please 'check • � appropriate.- reeponses> . - .. ._`.,.. . • . • ,. Petitioner' wi 11• b' ^resent 'zt. the. h arang,e ar'' `e :. �_ _ : .. _ Petitioner eequests the:. .the Board rule on : the 8ocumentation-i. eubm 4ted. . . Petitioner will. be represented by a Colorado Attorney .. .: X vee, no. . .. • . . .. #1.368 e p ige 1 ..o fy . ;" Make five (5) copies of this petition form with al : attachments and exhibits. The original (with original signature) plus three entire copies (a total of four (4) ) are to be filed • •.with the Board of Assessment Appeals; one entire copy to be filed with the Respondent (County Board of Equalization, County Commissioners or Property Tax Administrator) as shown in Certificate of Service; and one entire copy to be kept for- Petitioner 's records. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify to '•the Board of Assessment Appeals that I have mailed (or hard delivered) one copy of this petition form, together with all attachments and exhibits, to the Weld ( indicate one) County Board of Equalization, County Board of Commissioners, or Property Tax Administrator in Greeley Colorado, on August 29, 1990. . r• Julie• Cr•eni petitioner 's sisnature Attorney for P titioner neg. Na. 15025 640 E. Eisenhower Blvd. - Petitioner 's mailing address Suite A Loveland, Colorado 60537 (30:70 667-8968 r - petitioner 's Telephone No. -. • • k 'G^ page 2-of 2 X365 • RESQLUTI,QE . RE: THE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, ,1990, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PETITION OF: FREEMAN STEVE & JIM 342•_S.:6ST LA SALLE, Co ,80645. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: PI2 ,� 5r . CEL: 096131403008 - LAS 11665 L1 THRU 4 BLK13 MC CUTCHEONS .2ND EXC SELX 18'. Ll HWY R/W$427 N 2 ST$ WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, organized as a Board of Equalization for the purpose of adjusting, .equalizing, raising or lowering the assessment and valuation of real- and personal property within` this County, fixed and made by the County Assessor for the year . • 1990, and• WHEREAS, said .petition has been heard before the: County .- Assessor and due notice of, adjustment thereon has been given .• to the taxpayer(s) , and WHEREAS, the- taxpayer(s) presented a petition of appeal u to the County Assessor's; valuation'' for.theiyear 1990, claiming grounds for relief thereunder stating the property-:described in such petition'7was.;assessed.;too-high;;as more" speciffeally stated 'in said petition, ;and ';WHEREAS; , saidl Oetitioner'':bezng-`-represented )31r North ` American Property Consultants who submitted a letter regarding " said petition, and • WHEREAS, the Board has made,its findings on the evidence, • testimony and remonstrances and is now fully informed. NOW, .THEREFORE, .BE IT RESOLVED by tho Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, acting- as the ; Boards of Equalization, that the evidence. _presented at_ the hearing clearly supported-'the value 'placed upon- the Petitioner's property by the„Weld County.Assessor. Such evidence indicated the value'was reasonable,_ equitable - and derived.:according.to the methodologies,. .percentagesfigures' and formulas dictated to ,the:Weld County,Assessor br,laW - :AS: such;,this Board;finds. that the,Petitioner. feiled to.,meet its burden of proving that' the :Assessor's valuation- waoHincorrect. The assessment and valuation of the Weld .CountY!!ASSessor•Shall be, and hereby:is, arxirmd"d. • • � pUG20 � 4 Page 2 RE: BOE - FREEMAN STEVE & JIM BE ITFURTHER RESOLVED that a denial of a petition, in whole or in part, by the Board of Equalization may be appealed by selecting one of the following three options: • 1. board of Assetzsment_A,ppeals: You have the right to appeal the County Board of Equalization's (CBOE's) decision to the Board of Assessment Appeals (BAA) . Such hearing is the filal.. hearing at which ;testimony, exhibits or any ,other evidence may be introduced. If the decision of the BAA is further appealed to the .Court of Appeals, only the record created at the BAA hearing shall be the basis for the Court's decision. No new evidence can be introduced at the Court of Appeals. (39-8-108(1) , CRS) Appeals to the BAA must be made on forms furnished by the BAA, and should be mailed or delivered within thirty (30) • days of denial by the OBOE to: • Board of Assessment Appeals r 1313 Sherman Street, Room 523 Denver,• CO 80203 , Phone: 866-5880 . OR 2.' •District Court: ,You have, tho right to, appeal .the . CBOE,is,decisiontto the District Court'of the county wherein • ' ourproperty" is located.' " New testimony,Y . ' y, . exhibits or any • other,.- evidence may 'be introduced at , the , District.. .Court , "`hearing ,For; filing requirements please,eontact your attorney: or`tho.,Clerkof„the District Court. `-. Further appeal of the District'Court's decision is made to the Court of Appeals for a review of the record. (39-8-108 (1) , CRS) OR r 3. Binding Arbi-tration: You have the right to submit your , case to arbitration. - If you choose this option the arbitrator's decision; is final and your right to appeal your ' ;` current valuation_ ends. (39-8 .108.5, CRS) • Selecting the Arbitrator In order to pursue ' arbitration, you must notify the OBOE of your intent. You and the ,'..CBOE '-select an : arbitrator from the official list of ▪ qualified.-people. If you cannot agree; on an arbitrator, the - District Court of the county in which the property is located will make the selection. Arbitration Reari.na Procedure -,Arbitration hearings , are held within sixty days from the date the arbitrator is selected:._ Both you and the CBOE are entitled to. participate. The hearings are informal. The arbitrator has the authority, • Page 3 RE: BOE - FREEMAN STEVE & JIM • ' 'Y, to issue subpoenas for witnesses, books, records, documents 4 and other evidence. He also has the power to administer oaths, and all questions of law and fact shall be determined by him. The arbitration hearing may be confidential and closed A to the public, upon mutual agreement. The arbitrator's • written decision must be delivered to both parties personally or by registered mail within ten (10) days of the hearing. Such decision is final and not subject to review. Fees and Exnensez - The arbitrator's fees and expenses • are agreed upon by you and the OBOE. In the case - of residential real property, such fees and expenses•.,cannot.. exceed $150.00 per case. The arbitrator's fees and expenses, not including counsel fees, are to be paid as provided,.in•the ti decision. The above and foregoing Resolution was, ' on motiov.duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the."—.27th a day of Ju , A.D. , 1999 ,•aATTEST: / ‘ Griff �' V BOARD OF,COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD LINTY,.. COLORADO, 4, ...' . Weld County ,Clerk to the Board „• Apyl ene R Brantn r .Chairman 4 eputy clerk to a Board ege X nnedy, Pro Te �PPROVE D AS TO rop.x: (1--:-75 -1-4,,r 11-1-4,,rC /(6if/ 1 rte(, 4 Constance L. Harbert —mod , County Attorney C. W. Kirby./ _. _ ., (EXCUSED) • Gordon E. Lacy n ' l��' NIY6 'Z ��;�0 EC� 6 • / J , \ -._ _9U 10th STREET (// - 1 GT.LtiLCY,CLORAD030G'1 NOTICE OF DENIAL.- PHONE(303)3564000. FIXT.a2So }n n7r7 ? ;a 5�li% � ` LAS 11665 L1 THRU 4 BLfa3 HC CUTCHEON5 2ND I,..."Lti �VJ: k:CC S LY 181 L1 HWY R/ti 427 7_ 2 ST% Cal.,ORADO 427 N 2 ST LA SALL ONNER FREEMAN STEVE G JIM N.A•P•C• PARCEL , 096131403008 PIN R 4050486 . 640 E. EISENHONGR YEAR 1990 LOVELAND CO 80537 LOG 00847 06/12/1990 The appraised value of property is based on the appropriate consideration of the approaches to value required by law.The Assessor has determined that your property should be included in the following eategory(ies): Residential property is valued by considering the cost and market approaches. _Agricultural land value is determined solely by the earning or production capacity of the land,capitalized at a rate set by law. _Producing mines are assessed at 25%of the gross proceeds or 100%of the net Proceeds,whichever is greater. —Oil and gas leaseholds and lands are assessed at 87.5% of the gross value of the oil and/or gas sold or transported from the premises on primary production;secondary production is valued at 75%. -All other property, including vacant land,is valued by considering the cost,market,and income approaches. If your concern is the amount of your property tax, local taxing authorities (county, city, fire protection, and other special districts) hold budget hearings in the fall. Please refer to your tax bill or ask your Assessor for a listing of these districts,and plan to attend these budget hearings. The Assessor has carefully studied all available information, giving particular attention to the specific included on your protest and has deter- mined the valuation(s) assigned to your property.The reasons for this determination of value are: NO CHANGE HAS BEEN MADE TO .THE ACTUAL VALUATION OF THIS PROPERTY. COLORADO LAU REQUIRES US TO SEND THIS NOTICE OF DENIAL FOR ALL PROPERTIES ON WHICH NE- DU NOT ADJUST .THE VALUE. • i ' ASSESSOR'S VALUATION PETITIONER'S PROPERTY CLASSIFICATION ESTIMATE gCTUAL VALUC ACTUAL VALUE OF VALUE PRIOR TO REVIEW .AFTER REVIEYI LASED 22.420 22.420 IMPS 81.000 81.000 TOTALS $ $ 103.420 S 103} 420 If yov disagree with the Assessor's decision,you have the right to appeal to the County Board of Equalization for further consideration, 34-3.103(1)(a),C.R.S. Please see the back of this form for detailed Information on filing your appeal Fti,. RICHARD W. I:EIRNES 0-142-013 0 "- WELD COUNTY ASSESSOR DATE - 12 �n 1 ,'"t A0 r,,. ADDITIONAL INF0P,MATI0N ON REVERSER ti i!'• 2 5 !C^^ • A6` `EIV,_R I r • r PETITION TO THE STATE AT BOARD 0- ASSESSMENT APPEALS Date: August 28 , 1990 TO THE HONORABLE BOARD OF ASSESSMENT APPEALS: Your Petitioner, Freeman Truck,_ Bodies (name of property owner) S Hwx85 La Sam le, CO 80645 (Street address, City, State, Zip Code of subject property) hereby appeals the decision of the (chock once) _ (_County Board of Egualization County Board of Commissioners Property Tax Administrator for^ property located in the° County of Weld _ that was dated Ac_-gust 17, 1990, concerning (chock one) X Valuation Refund Exemption Abatement for the year (s) 1990. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: (Legal description - if multiple properties are involved in the one decision being appealed, a • listing of the county schedule or parcel numbers with the corresponding properties - must be submitted as an attachment to the petition) PARCEL #10550620002b/PIN1 R 4324986 P'ROP'ERTY CLASSIFICATION: This property is classified as:. (Please check one) _X Commercial Residential X Vacant land Industrial Agricultural Natural Resources Producing Mines , Oil and Gas State Assessed Exempt ;r ATTACHMENTS TO THIS PETITION FORM: (Please check off the attachments you will be using) , X The decision (County Board of Equalization, -County Board -of ' Commissioners, or Property Tax Administrator) that is being appealed. This attachment MUST be with the petition in order for it to be accortud for- docketing. • X The Assessor's Notice of Denial . X The facts and law (thy' issue(s) involved) , on which thin appeal is bAsed. C.P.S_39-8-108 (1) X List of witnesses and exhibits to be used at the hearing. (Per BAA Rule 11 To be determined) X Exhibits, if any, to be used at the hearing. leer BAA Rule 11 To be determined) CST 1 MATED TIME FOR PETITIONER TG PRESENT THE APPEAL: 60 minutes or' 1 hours . . . REPRESENTATION: (Please chock appropriate responses) Petitioner, 'will bra• Present at the hearing, ' or or^ Petitioner •recluosts that thzz. Board rule on the documentation '_' ::ui>mittoe. ' titioner will be rs-pre`-+F'.'nted by wa Colorado Attorney _I__yes, no. 41:568 page 1 0- 2 I r Make five (C) copies of this petition form with all `• .attachments and exhibits. The original (with original signature) .r plus three entire copies (a total of four (4) ) are to be filed -.with the Board of Assessment Appeals; one entire copy to be filed with the Respondent (County Board of Equalisation, County Commissioners or Property Tag Administrator) as shown in , Certificate of Service; and one entire copy to be kept for 1 Petitioner 's records. j C;ERT I=I CATS OF SERVICE A I certify to 'the Board of Asses:sment Appeals that I have , nailed (or hand delivered) one copy of this petition form, together with all attzchments and exhibits, to the Weld • (indicate one) County Board of Equalization, County Board of ' Commissioners, or Property Tax Administrator in Greeley . Colorado, on August 29, 1990. '1 •M -• \ ( C.1.-.'..$) J'uli ? Greni Petitioner's signature Attorney for Petitioner ,, Reg. No. 15025 640- E. Eisenhower Blvd. Petitioner 's mailing address / r Suite A Loveland, Colorado 00537 .. ( 03) 667--8968 . . . .. • :; ;f' ,� .A! . P'etitioner's Telephone .No. • , =1t ., 4. .. _ .. . . _.. ... *. . . .. ..N , , • . , ♦ . Ii , • , • , • ' ..... . - .' '• .. •.. pzt8 � of 2 • RESOLUTION , RE: THE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, 1990, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PETITION OF: FREEMAN TRUCK BODIES INC . 427 2 ST - LA SALLE, CO 80645 �A y -may' r . ._. rOw'errry .s•1AS DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: P ARCEL:' 105506200028 - 11889 PT NW4 6 4 65 BEG ON OF NW4 400'S OF NE COR S0D32 'W 458 ' S36D17'W 485' N74D46'W 210' N29D36'E 912' E43.1' TO BEG (TR 9) EXC BEG 400'S OF CEN OF SEC W43.01' S29D36'W 201' TO TRUE POB S60D24 'E 100' S29D36'W 100' N60D24 'W • WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, - Colorado, organized as a Board of Equalization for the purpose of adjusting, equalizing, raising or lowering the assessment and valuation of real and personal property within,.;this County, fixed and made by the County Assessor for the. year 1990, and WHEREAS, said petition has been heard before the _County Assessor and due notice of adjustment thereon has been given to the taxpayer(s) , and WHEREAS, the -taxpayer(s) .presented a, petition ,,of:appeal - te the County Assessor's valuation for:the year;199O," claiming grounds for. relief thereunder stating.the ;property;;described in such petition was..assessed too high, as,more specifically; stated in said petition, -and ' •' WHEREAS, said petitioner being represented by 'North American Property Consultants who submitted a letter regarding said petition, and WHEREAS, the Board has made its findings on the evidence, _ testimony and remonstrances_and is. now _fully_ informed._ __ '. .. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT 'RESOLVED by ;tile' Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, acting 'as the Board , of Equalization, that the evidence -presented at .the.;-hearing , clearly supported the value_;;placed upon the- Petitioner's ' property by the Weld"County Assessor. Such evidence_indicated' the value'was reasonable, equitable]- andtderived.aceording to the methodologies, percentages, figures and ,formulas'dictated • to the Weld County Assessor by law. As such, this:Board,finds that the Petitioner failed to meet its burden of proving .that the Assesnor's valuation; wasincorreet. 'The assessment,and . valuation• of the Weld County Assessor shall be, and hereby is, +1]x T+ctY � C �`�� .,iu 2 3199C . • Page 2 RE: DOE - FREEMAN TRUCK BODIES INC BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED._that a denial of a petition, in whole or in part, by the Board of Equalization may be appealed by selecting one of the following three options: 1. Board- Of Assessment Ameals: You have the right to appeal the County Board of-Equalization's (CBOE's) • decision to the Board of Assessment Appeals (BAA) . Such hearing --is the final, hearing at which testimony, exhibits or any other evidence may be introduced. If the decision of the BA •i As further appealed' to the Court of Appeals, only the record created at the BAA hearing shall be the basis for the Court's decision. No new evidence can be introduced at the Court 'of Appeals. (39-8-108(1) , CRS) Appeals to the BAA must be made on forms furnished by . the BAA, and should be mailed or .delivered within thirty (30) - days of denial by the CBOE to: Board of Assessment Appeals 1313 Sherman Street, Room 523 Denver, CO . 80203 Phone: 866-5880 OR 2. District Comm: , You have the . right%to appeal the CBOEfe `decision to the District ,Court 'of the :county wherein. • • your property is located. '. New ',testimeny, exhibits' or<any other :.evidence .may be, -introduced • at; the .:District .-Court ?.i hearing. For 'filing requirements:.please,00ntact'yeur. atterney- or'the Clerk of the District Court. FUrther appealYef' the - District Court's decision is made to the court of Appeals for a review of the record_ (39-8-108(1) , CRS) OR • i 3. Binding Arbi_trA ion: You have the right to submit your . case_ -to- arbitration. .,. If you choose this- option- the • ' arbitrator's decision is final and 'your right, to appeal your current valuation ends. (39-8-108.5,' CRS) } Selecting - ` the Arbitrator - ' In order to pursue • arbitration, you must notify%the OWE of"your intent.,"- You and , the CBOE,. select an arbitrator' from the official : list: of . qualified people.', Sf you cannot agree on'an arbitrator, the District Court of the county-in-Which the property is -located - will_ make, the selection:. Arbitratialigcnu Procedurg - arbitration hearings. are. hold within sixty days.-from the date the -arbitrator is selected. - . Eoth you and the CEOE are -entitled to participate. The hearings are informal. The arbitrator has the authority: ` :=age 3 RE: BOE - FREEMAN TRUCK BODIES INC r to issue subpoenas for witnesses, books, records, documents i and other evidence. He also has the power to administer oaths, and all questions of law and tact shall be determined by him. r The arbitration hearing may be confidential and closed to the public, upon mutual agreement. The arbitrator's written decision must be delivered to both parties personally or by registered mail within ten (10) days of the hearing. Such decision is final, and not subject to review. Foes and Expenses - The arbitrator's fees and expenses are agreed upon by you and the CBOE. In the case of residential real property, such fees and expenses , cannot'_ exceed $150.00 per case. The arbitrator's fees and expenses, . + not including counsel fees, are to be paid as,provided in,the decision. . The 'above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly' made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the ,?Ztij t day of J y. , A.D. , 19 0. ATTEST: BOARD or COUNTY COMMISSIONERS L �/21�/ P t - r WEL C rTX, COLORADO Weld County Clerk to the Board i. r `' k• ene R rantner, .Chairman � eputy Clerk to-the Board - - coffle Kennedy, Pro-Tem AP}P D AS TO FORM: ��'��-wee-a lv 4 • Constance L. Harbert j ounty.;Attorney - C. W. Xirby� k i (EXCUSED)- •• Gordon E. Lacy nro /R\ ,‘911; '-� _& S Vi.,i6zU 10th ctn.:. .,:,,..,,s.,..r . �3 91510th h STREET i ` " -- •"-" GREELEy COLORADO 80611 ' NOTICE OF•-A ENIAC' PRONE(303)356-4000 EX i:•`^ r .,,�nt .�(ai��`J I 11889 PT NW4 ti 4 45 BEG A7 A P7 0:1 E L:J Dr' t:.+4 4,11,4„19,. 400' S OF NE CUR S0032'W 458' S360171W 435' `1..J L � ' N74D46'W 210' :129D3 ti' E 912' E43.1 ' 70 BEG ( TZ 91 COLORADO EXC BEG 4001S OF GEN OF SEC W43.011 529D3o' W 201' TO TRUE POD $60D24'E 100' $29D361W 100' N60D241A OWNER FREEMAN ,TRUCK BODIES INC N.A.P.C• PARCEL -.. - 105506200028 ' 'Pile- . •-. R 4324986 640 E• EISENHOWER YEAR 1990 1OVELAND CO 130537 LOG 00348 , I 06/12/1990 The apprised value of property is based on the aPPropriate consideration of the approaches to value required by law.The Assessor has determined that your property should be included in the following category(ies): i _ Residential property is valued by considering the cost and market approaches. -Agricultural land value is determined solely by the earning or production capacity of the land,capitalized at a rate set by law. _ _Producing mines are assessed at 25%of the gross proceeds or 100%of the net proceeds,whichever is greater, -Oil and gas leaseholds and lands are assessed at 87.5% of the gross value of the oil and/or gas sold or transported from the premises on primary production:secondary production is valued at 75%. —All other property,including vacant land,is valued by considering the cost,market,and income approaches. If your concern is the amount of your property tax, local taxing authorities (county, city,fire protection, and other special districts) hold I budget hearings in the fall. Please refer to your tax bill or ask your Assessor for a listing of these districts,and plan to attend these budget hearings. The Assessor has carefully studied all available information, giving �particular attentio{n to the specifics included on your protest and has deter- mined N valuatien(s).asHAS Dc.:-.N reasons for VALUoAnTIONaOF MIS PROPCRTY• NO GHA1JG i:. HAS D�.`.tJ M ' COLORADO LAW REQUIRES US TO SEN ) THIS NOTICE OF DENIAL FOR ALL PROPERTIES ON WHICH WE DONOT ADJUST THE VALUE. I PETITIONER'S ASSESSOR'S VALUATION PROPERTY CLASSIFICATION ESTIMATE ACTUAL VALUE ACTUAL VALUE tl OF VALUE PRIOR TO RCVIEW AFTER REVIEW - LAND 24,750 2475O 1 IMPS • IL_I - TOTALS S • S 2., i5u S .4'.1 rt,U `If you disagree with the Assessor's decision,you have the right to appeal to the County Board of Equalization for further consideration, 's9$-10 (1)(a),C.R.S. Please see the back of this form for detailed information on filing your appeal. RICHARD W. T;EIRNES .. 06/19/90 By:- o WELD COUNTY ASSESSOR - RECEIVED JUN 2 2 1S2G en O.n A -1n„-,1,. I. ,...-ne,••4T.^., n•. -.intr.—err P.rrq i PET I T I ris! TO THE STATE BOARD OF ASSESSMENT APPEALS�-c Date: Au4ut-.1t 23 , 1990 TO THE HONORABLE BOARD OF ASSESSMENT APPEALS: . . . . . s` Your Petitioner,Big R Mfq. & Dist. Inc. (name of property owner) 4th- Ave `,. nth St - Greeley, CO 80632 (Street address, City, State, Zip Coda` of subject property) hareby appeals the decision of the (check one) X County Beard of Equalization County Board of Commissioners A Property Tax Administrator for property located in the County of Weld_ • that was dated August 17. 1990,, concerning (check one) X Valuation Refund Exemption Abatement 1 for the year(s) 1990. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: (Legal description - if multiple properties are involved in the ono decision being appealed, a Iistin3 of the county schedule or parcel numbers with the corresponding properties. - must be submitted _as an attachment to �s the petition) PARCEL *096105403001/PIN R 2831086 , . . 4 PROPERTY CLASSIFICATION: This property-_ is classified • as: (Please check ono) . X Commercial Residential Vacant land Industrial k ;,. Agricultural - Natural Resources,: ' Frodatding "fine_ . Oil and Gas State Assessed 'Exempt •% ATTACHMENTS TO THIS PETITION FORM: (Please check off _the . . ,4 attachments you will' be• using) X The decision (County Board-of Equalization, County Board of _ Commissioners, or Property Tax Administrator) that is being * • `.t appealed. . 1; This attachment MUST be with the petition in order for it to be acceptad for docketins. • X They Assessor's Notice of Denial. X Th, foots and law (the issue(s) involved) , on which this; appe.A is based. C.R.S. 39-8-108 (1) X List of witnesses and exhibits to be used .at the hearing. (Per BAA Rule 11 To be determined) X Exhibits, if any, to be used at the hearing: - . (Per E+AA Rule 21 To be determined) ESTIMATED TIME FOR PETITIONER TO- PRESENT THE APPEAL: . 40_ minutA� or- 1': ho�irs . . . fti . - REPRES4N T ATION: (Please 'check, ,appropr^i'ato 'responses) -? Fe'tit+onc+r w b ill c pr ci;o .'it �;t the .heain9�. Gr. _ Petitioner recucsts that••the Board, rule 'en the documentation sLit,mitita.d• ; Poti t i one will be r•epr^esented:by .a Colorado .Attorney . , . • . ` X yes,_. no. . . - it 135:. pose. 1 ;of ,2. , . • . .'. • . . . . i r 1 Make five (C) copies of this petition form with all ' attachments and exhibits. The original (with original signature) plus thre=e entire copies (a total of four (4) ) are to be filed -with the Board of Assessment Appeals; one entire copy to be filed with the Respondent (County Soard of Equalization, County Commissioners or property Tax Administrator) as shown in Certificate of Service; and one entire copy to be kept for Petitioner 's records. -i CERTIFICATE CF SERVICE • I certify to .the Board of Assessment Appeals that I have mailed (or hand delivered) one copy of this petition form, together with all attachments and exhibits, to the Weld ( indicate ono) County Board of Equalization, County Board of Commissioners, or Property Tax Administrator- in Greoley Colorado, cn August 29, 1990. _m July �+ Greni Petitioner 's signature Attorney for Ft.titioner Res. No. 15025 > 640 E. Eisenhower Blvd. Petitione'r's mailing address Suite A Loveland, Colorado 80.577 (Z:07) 667-S76S Petitioner's Telephone No. • , - • li 1333• page 2 of 2 • �-%' • RESQLUTION RE: THE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, 1990, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO { PETITION OF: PETERSON RUSSELL % BIG "R". MANUFACTURING • P O BOX 1290 • GREELEY, CO 80632 j DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: PIN ?"21grg$reER RCEL: 096105403001 - GR 122X ALL BLX115 EXC S50 4TfAVE&4-STH ST% WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, organized as a Board of Equalization for the purpose ; of adjusting, equalizing, raising or lowering the assessment and valuation of real and personal property within this County, fixed and made by the County Assessor for the year 1990, and WHEREAS, said petition has been heard before the County ". Assessor and due notice of adjustment thereon has been given to the taxpayer(s) , and • WHEREAS, the taxpayer(s) presented a petition of appeal to the County Assessor's.valuation for the.year 1990, claiming grounds for relief thereunder stating::the property described. in such petition was assessed too high,- as more specifically ' stated in said petition,' and ,.. WHEREAS; said petitioner being `represented by North American Property Consultants who submitted a letter regarding said petition, and • WHEREAS, the Board has made its findings on the evidence, testimony and remonstrances and is now fully informed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE ' IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, acting as the . Board of Equalization, that the evidence presented at the hearing clearly supported the value placed upon the Petitioner's property,by. the Weld County Assessor. . Such evidence indicated the value was reasonable,. equitable, and derived' according.to the methodologies, percentages, figures and formulas dictated to the .Weld County Assessor by law.. As such, this Board finds- that the Petitioner failed to meet its burden of proving that 'the 'Assessor's valuation was incorrect. The assessment and valuation of the Weld County A"sitsor shall be, and hereby is, affirmed. � � ��G_2 C ;�t ` ` Page 2 RE: BOE - PETERSON RUSSELL BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a denial of a petition,. -in whole or in part, by the Board of Equalization may be appealed by selecting one of the following three options: `' 1: Board of Assessment Auoeals: You have "the- right to. appeal the County Board of Equalization's (CBOE's)' aecisioh' to the Board of Assessment Appeals (BAA) . Such hearing is the final hearing at which testimony, exhibits, or any other evidence may be introduced. If the decision of the BRA is further appealed to the Court of Appeals, only the record created at the BAA hearing shall be the basis for the Court's` decision. No new evidence can be introduced at the Court-of Appeals. (39-8-108(1) , CRS) Appeals to the BAA must be made on forms furnished -by, the BAA, and should be mailed or delivered within thirty (30) days of denial by the OBOE to: � i Board of Assessment Appeals 1313 Sherman Street, Room 523 Denver, CO 80203 Phone: 866-5880 ' OR 2. ' District Court: You' have the..right- to" appeal the �. CBOE's decision to the District Court of the county wherein ' your property', is located. New testimony`, - exhibits or ' any. ' other evidence may be 'introdueed at -,the :pistrict Court:. !: hearing. For filing requirements please centact`your°attorney r or the Clerk of the District . Court.Court, Further appeal of the, District Court's decision is made to the Court of Appeals for- - a review of the record. (39-8-108 (1) , CRS) ; j i OR 3. Bind n.g_art} ttation: You have the right to submit. your case to arbitration. If you choose' this option' the : i arbitrator's decision is final. and your right to appeal your , current valuation ends. (39-8-108.5, CRS) Selecting tbe -,Ar.tOjt atoms - In order to; pursue - 'arbitration, you must notify:the CBOE of your intent.'- You-and • the CBOE- select an arbitrator 'tom the official-. list` oP ' - qualified people: If you cannot agree on an arbitrator, the District Court of the county in which the property_ is located_ will make the selection. i aikitr.atio0 Iii ing nroeed_yr2 - Arbitration' hearings are held within sixty days from the date ,the ' arbitrator is . selected: Both you and the CBOE are entitled to participate':, ` The: hearings are informal. The arbitrator has 'the' autho;ity . r, F, • Page 3 RE: BOE - PETERSON RUSSELL to issue subpoenas for witnesses, books, records, documents and other evidence. He also has the power to administer oaths, and all questions of law and fact shall be determined by him. The arbitration hearing may be confidential and closed to the public, upon mutual agreement. The arbitrator's written decision must be delivered to both parties personally or by registered mail within ten (10) days of the hearing. Such decision is fine and not subject to review. gees and_£xAenses - The arbitrator's fees and expenses are agreed upon by you and the CBOE. In the case of residential real property, such fees and expenses cannot exceed $150.00 per case. The arbitrator's fees and expenses, not including counsel fees, are to be paid as provided in the decision. • The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the y7�I day of J ly, A.O , 1 0. ATTEST: ' BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DD 44 ? WEL OUNTY, CO RADO . , Weld County Clerk to the Board . � . ene R. Bran ner, Chairman eputy Clerk t the Board �� ..` Ge ge Kennedy, Pro-Tem /7 • AP 40, fi� D AS TO FORM: , -S -ee" •Or41��.r Constance L, Harbert A% County Attorn y C. W. Kirby 7 Gordon E. Lacy RCS r + \ Uri-ii:GuFC ST'i r55Z55Jx \1 915 10th STREET l)/ t10T•Ca OF -CEXIAL GR£C.L£Y,COLORADO 80611 PHONE(303?356-4000, Err.4256 nr-3 'i1a alj3 "') GR 12.2X ALL 3LX115 EXC SSOFTi4TH AV C. 3TX ST: r t .? �3 3 602 4 AV GRZELEY 0DNER PETERSON RUSSELL t1.A.P.C. PARCZL 096105403001 PIN R 2831066 640 E EISENHD'v:ER. STE. A YEAR 1990 LOVELAND CU x0537 LOG 00826 06/12/1990 Tile appraised value of property is based on the appropriate consideration of the approaches to value required by law.The Assessor has determined that your property should be included in the following co.tegory(ies): Residential property is valued by considering the cost and market approaches. -�Agricultural land value is determined solely by the earning or production capacity of the land,capitalized at a rate set by law. Producing mines are assessed at 25%of the gross proceeds or 100%of the net proceeds,whichever is greater, Oil and gas leaseholds and lands are assessed at 87,5% of the gross value of the oil and/or gas sold or transported from the premises on primary production;secondary production is valued at 75x., �.All other property,including vacant land,is valued by considering the cost,market,and income approaches. If your concern is the amount of your proporty tax, local taxing authorities (county, city, fire protection, and other special districts) hold L udget hearings in the fall.Please refer to your tax bill or ask your Assessor for a listing of these districts,and plan to attend these budget hearings. Tra Assessor has carefully studied all available information, giving particular attention to the specifics included on your protest and has deter- n•.:rtedthsv.�J�a•ip { Iassignidtoy.0urprop�rty.T�erCas0lls�o�!h dote inYQrtcfAl,ueb�: TH1.; PROPERTY. Li ,aF Vt Ht�.`.. uLtt. ,�,, 1 , ric TT nL vALu.. �,tt COLORADO LA:4 REQUIRES U5 TO SEND THIS NOTICE OF DENIAL FOR ALL PROPERTIES ON WHICH WC DO NOT ADJUST THE VALUE* • PETITIONER'S ASSESSOR'S VALUATION PROPERTY CLASSIFICATION ESTIMATE ACTUAL VALUE ACTUAL VALUE OF VALUE PRIOR TO REVIEW AFTER REVIEW LAND 37x800 373800 111P Z. 160. 671 1683 671 I I l I� f TOTALS S S zJ 34]t S ?0G�47^Y ;f yeu cisagrae with the Asset:errs decision,you have the right to appeal to the County Board of Equalization for further consideration, .. 3•SC3(1)ia),C.F.S. Please see the back of this form for detailed information on filing your appeal. ' RICHARD W. KEIRNES ob/26/9-0 . ,• — WELD COUNTY ASSESSOR RECEIVED JUN 2 8 i 7-1 5 o`r,- 707 eVon ADDiTIONAL INFORMATION ON REVERSE SIDE �l'. , TITION TO THE STATE BOARD OF 1 �cEMENT APPEALS Date: August 28 , 1990 O THE HONORAL,LC BOARD OF ASSESSMENT APPEALS: Your Petitioner, _Big R Mfg. 9,, Dist. Inc. (name of property owner) 307 6th St. - Greeley. CO $0632 (Street address, City, State=, Tip Code of subject property) hereby appeals the decision of the (check: one) X County Board of Equalization County $oard of Commissioners Property Tax Administrator for property located in the County of Weld that wa,L dated August 17. 1990, concerning (check one) X Valuation Refund Exemption _Abatement for the year (s) 1990. DEECRIATION OF PROPERTY: (Legal description - if multiple p 'eps.rties are involved in the one decision being appealed, a _ listing of tho county schedule or parcel numbers with the corresponding properties - must be submitted as an attachment to the petition) PARCEL #096105403007/PIN R 2831386 PROPERTY CLASSIFICATION: This property .d Classified was: (Please check: one) _X Commercial Residential _Vacant land Industrial _Agricultural Natural Resources Producing Mines Oil and Gas State Assessed _Exempt ATTACHMENTS TO THIS PETITION FORM: (Please Check: off the attachments you will be using) X The decision (County Board of Equalization, County Board of Commis=sioners,, or Property Tax Administrator) that is being appealed. This attachment MUST be with the petition in order for it to be accepted for docketing. X The Assessor 's Notice of Denial . X The facts and law (the issue (s) involved) , on which this appeal is based. C.R.S 39-8-108 (1) _ X Lint- of witnesses and exhibits to be used at the hearing. (Per BAA Rule 11 To be determined) X Exhibits, if any, to be used at the hearing. (Per BAA Rule 11 To be determined) ESTIMATED TIME FOR PETITIONER 'TO PRESENT THE APPEAL: 60 minutes or 1 hours ' PEPRESrENTATICN: (Please check appropriate responses,) F•e itloncr will be present at the hearing, or Petitioner requests that the Board rule on the documentation ub . tied. i''oti �inncr will be rc•presented by a Colorado Attorney ($1'0_ page 1 of 2 • Make fiver ( ) copies of this petition form with all tt `t_ monts ,:and ehibits. The original (with original signature) plus; three entire copies (a total of =cur (4) ) are to be filed with the Board of Assessment Appeals; one entire copy to be filed with the Respondent (County Board or Equalization, County Commissioners or Property Tax Administrator) as shown in • Certificate of Service; and one entire copy to be kept for • Petitioner 's records. CERTIFICATE CE SERVICE I certify to the Board of Assessment Appeals that I have railed (or hand delivered) one copy ;if this petition form, together with all attachments and exhiti t- to the Weld ( indicate cne) County Board of Equalization, County Board of Commissioners, or Property Tax Admini,Ltrator in Grreeeley Colorado, on August 29, 1990. �l / c �� Sufi .+ Greni ( Potitioner 's signature Attorney for Petitioner Rog. No. 1S025 640 E. Eisenhower Blvd. Petitioner 's mailing address Suite A Loveland, Colorado S0Z37 (303) 667-8968 M Petitioner 's Telephone No. t_ #1363 pagm 2 off' 2 - 1P /36 $ESOLUTION RE: THE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, 1990, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PETITION OF: PETERSON RUSSELL BIG ^R" MANUFACTURING P 0 BOX 1290 GREELEY, CO 80632 DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: PIN ,,,. 5:EARCEL: 0961054 03 007 - GR 118-X E175' OF S50' BLK115 ALSO PORTION OF VAC 6TH ST Ana TO&303 6TH ST% WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, organized as a Board of Equalization for the purpose of adjusting, equalizing, raising or lowering the assessment and valuation of real and personal property within this County, fixed and made by the County Assessor for the year 1990, and WHEREAS, said petition has been heard before the County Assessor and due notice of adjustment thereon has been given to the taxpayer(s) , and WHEREAS, the taxpayers) presented a `petition. of appeal to the County Assessor's valuation for the year 1990, claiming grounds for relief thereunder "stating the property" described in such petition was" assessed too high, ,as more 'specifically stated in said petition, and h' WHEREAS, said petitioner being represented by North American Property Consultants who submitted a letter regarding said petition, and • WHEREAS, the Board has made its findings on the evidence, testimony and remonstrances and is now fully informed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of . Weld County, acting as the Board of Equalization, that the evidence presented at the hearing clearly supported" the value placed upon the Petitioner's property by the Weld County Assessor. Such evidence indicated . the value was reasonable; equitable, and derived accoxding'to the methodologies, percentages, figures and formulas/.dictated -.. to the Weld County:Assessor by law. As such, this• Board. finds that the Petitioner failed to meet its, burden of proving that the Assessor's valuation was incorrect. The assessment and -valuation of the Weld; County'Asi essoz shall be, and hereby is, affirmed." • i Page 2 RE: BOE - PETERSON RUSSELL BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a denial of a petition,- in whole or in part, by the Board of Equalization may be appealed by selecting one of the following three options: • - 1. Board of Assessment Appeals: You have the right'.to appeal the County Board of Equalization's (CBOE's) decision to the Board of Assessment Appeals (BAA) . Such hearing is the fink, hearing at which testimony, exhibits or any other evidence may be introduced. If the decision of the BAA is further appealed to the Court of Appeals, only the record created at the BAA hearing shall be the basis for the Court's decision. No new evidence can be introduced at the Court of Appeals. (39-8-108(1) , CRS) Appeals to the BAA must be made on forms furnished by the BAA, and should be mailed or delivered within thirty 130) days of denial by the CBOE to: . Board of Assessment Appeals 1313 Sherman Street, Room 523 Denver, CO 80203 Phone: 866-5880 OR ' 2. District Court - You have the right .to appeal, _the CBOE's decision to the District Court of the county wherein your property is located. New ;testimony, exhibits or, any i other evidence may be introduced at ' the/:District Court • hearing ,-For filing requirements please contact your attorney or the Clerk of the District Court. Further appeal of the • District Court's decision is made to 'the Court of Appeals-for a review of the record. (39-8-108(1) , CRS) OR 3 . Rindirtg Arbitration: You have the right to submit your case to arbitration. If you choose this, option the arbitrator's decision is final and your right to appeal: your current valuation ends. (39-8-108.5, CRS) ' Sel^ctinq the Arbitrator " In order to pursue arbitration, you must notify,the CBOE of your intent. You and - the CBOE select an arbitrator . from. the official list' -Of' .qualified people. If you cannot agree on an arbitrator the District Court of the county is which the property is located will make' the selection. Arbit.r. .aTI Hellr,ia 2Kocedurc: - Arbitration hearings are held within sixty days from the date the arbitrator is selected. Both you and the CBOE are entitled to participate.- The hearings are informal. The arbitrator has the authority •r C�1V�0 ;Auo 1 0 ,�.,C R,_ • Page 3 RE: BOE - PETERSON RUSSELL to issue subpoenas for witnesses, books, records, documents and other evidence. He also has the ,power to administer oaths, and all questions of law and fact shall be determined by him. The arbitration hearing may be confidential and closed to the public, upon mutual agreement. The arbitrator's written decision must be delivered to both parties personally or by registered mail within ten (10) days of the hearing. Such decision is final and not subject to review. Fees and Exnenses - The arbitrator's fees and e:penses are agreed upon by you and the CBOE. . In .the.. easel .of residential real property, such fees and expenses cannot exceed S150.00 per case. The arbitrator's fees and expenses, not including counsel fees, are to be. paid as provided 'inthe, . decision. The above and foregoing Resolution' was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the, following vote on the ,27th. day of J ly, A.D1, 1 O. ATTEST: ��/�jJ'// BOARD. OF COUNTY cON,MZSSIONERS ��ic l v"((//G/�. 11 . . last OUNTY,: CO RADO " Weld. County Clerk to the Board � ` ene.:.R. Bran ne/r Chairman IT-, ft.); eputy Clerk to,the Board G7 ge Kennedy, Pro-Ten APPROVED AS TO FORM: :1"-- (/ j Zoe��,1,� , l Constance L. Harbert ,17 County Attorney C. W. Kirby. (EXCUSSDI ' Gordon. E. Lacy a '} i BUG f � � � �F, sC 915 10th STREET GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 • MiONE(303)356.1000. EXT.4256 rnpnyEn `W J . COLORADO . _ _ .sT aRtaa:_sy c...,,::a .. .:c•<.._ i, ..+.F.C . PMRC�L. 3'7610$403007 P::1 a Zb:.1::u0 TC. 1.:(•:.CL:(A •.<J L L .•- ..ithO!.1 .; 2TE. A Y.L.-lR 1970 i.:V'iL.d... CJ 7;.5_47 LOG 0JdZ7 0 a�::/2 ')?v The appraised value of property is based on the appropriate consideration of the approaches to value required by law.The Assessor has determined that your property should be included in the following eategory(ies): Residential property is valued by considering the cost and market approaches. Agricultural land value is determined solely by the earning or production capacity of the land,capitalized at a rate set by law, _Producing mines are assessed at 25%of the gross proceeds or 100%of the net proceeds,whichever is greater. Oil and gas leaseholds and lands are assessed at 87.5% of the gross value of the oil and/or gas sold or transported from the premises on primary production:secondary production is valued at 75%. - All other property,including vacant land,is valued by considering the cost,market,and income approaches. If your concern is the amount of your property tax, local taxing authorities (county, city, fire protection, and other special districts) hold budget hearings in the fall. Please refer to your tax bill or ask your Assessor for a listing of these districts,and plan to attend these budget hearings. The Assessor has carefully studied all available information, giving particular attention to the specifics included on your protest and has deter- mined the valuations) assigned to your property.The reasons for this determination of value are: ..� MAV:5 -:.`.:Ji.:.: YCUIi Y:�Ca'�RTY VALU.L .air:/ :T 13 CCRRaCT. ".TATS Lwk .,....,:I'i:._ THAT 1967/17dJ CCSi? Mi:ii i; .,T AND INCOME INFCRMATION bL- USED TO 3TA.LLLt4iH CUYRCNT vi4LU,LS. , . '':U CHANGL. HAS bLr'_N M.,4Z: TO 1%.L 'ACTUAL VHLUATIOiv Cfr THIS PROPERTY. COLORADO LAW AC(zUi..^-.ES. UL 7O SEND 7:1I:, l4OTICL CF DONIAL FCR ALL i'iicp1-:RTI@S co.; whIcH 6.lz DC NUT .`._JU T The VAL'JL.. ' PETITIONER'S ASSESSOR'S VALUATION PROPERTY CLASSIFICATION ESTIMATE VALUE ACTUAL VALUE ACTUAL VALUE OF PRIOR TO REVIEW AFTER REVIEW 1 . j LAr:..) -- 74 500 71 sOJ • 1':Y: ROaaCl bOp :.v"S I TOTALS S - S a7, :.:O; S 371301. I i you disagree with the Assessor's decision,you have the right to appeal to the County Board of Equalization for further consideration, - Ll(-3-1e5(1)(a),C.R.S. Please see the back of this form for detailed information on filing your appeal. . (: y. RICHARD W. KEIR:VES :-..-7J. .r L WELD COUNTY ASSESSOR DATC 6 • trpn -A ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON REVERSE SIDE R•20707/90 fo.0 P 1 f T ON H STATE J ASSESSMENT wAPPEALS r CT� , I PETITION Ti) THE .;TA s._ �•CA5n OF A,_,.,�S�Mc�I ; Date: August 2S 1990 TO THE HONORABLE BOARD OF ASSESSMENT APPEALS: Your Petitioner, Bi�g R Mfg. & Dist. Inc. (name of property owner) 302 6th St. - Greeley. CO 80632 _ - (Street address, City, State, Zip Code of subject property) hereby appeals the decision of the (check one) X Cc;.tnty Board of Equalization County Board of Commissioners Property Tax Administrator for- property Iooated in the County of Weld that was dated August 17. 1990?, concerning (check: one) X Valuation i Re+tintJ Exemption Abatement for th., year(s) 1990. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: (Legal description - if multiple • properties are involved in the one decision being appealed, a listing of the county schedule or parcel numbers with the corresponding properties - must be submitted as an attachment to the petition) PARCEL #096105408005/PIN R 2836686 PROPERTY CLASSIFICATION: This property is classified as: :r (Please check one) S _X Commercial Residential Vacant land Industrial 4 �Agricultural Natural Resources Producing Mines 0i .. and Gay State Assessed Exempt ;• • , ATTACHMENTS TO THIS PETITION FORM: (Please check off the attachments you will be using).. . X The decision (County Board of Equalization, County Board - of Commissioners, or property Tear Administrator) that is bring ?` This attachment MUST be with the petition in order for it to be accepted for docketing. X The Assessor 's Notice of Denial. X The facts and law (the issue(s) involved) , on which thi appeal is based. C.R.S 39-8-108 (1) )( ,List of witnesses and exhibits to be used at the hearing. (Per BAA Rule 11 To be determined) X Exhibits, if any, to by used at the hearing. (Per BAA Rule 11 To be determined) ESTIMATED TIME FOR PETITIONER TO PRESENT THE: APPEAL: 60 minutes or 1 hours - REPRESENTATION: (Please check appropriate responses.) , fetit-idner will be present at the hearing; .or • . _ Pot it iener requests that the Board rule on the documentation . et. bmittcad. Petitioner will be represented by a Colorado Attorney • • • • #4,1383 . . page 1 c4 2 • Make five (5) copies of this petition form with all attachments and exhibits. The original (with original signature) plus three entire copier (a total of four (4) ) are to be filed -with the Goard of Assessment Appeals; one entire copy to be filed with the Respondent (County Board of Equalization, County • Commissioners or Property Tax Administrator) as shown in Certificate of Service; and one entire copy to be kept for Petitioner " _ records. CERTIRICATE C'' SERVICE I certify to the Board of Assessment Appeals that I have maile=d (or hand delivered) ono copy of this petition form, together with all attachments and exhibits, to the Weld indicatr. one.) County Board of Equalization, County Board of Commilstioners, or property Tax Administrator in Greeley ; Colorado, on August 29, 1990. C, Julie- Greni Petitioner's signature Attorney for Petitioner Reg. No. 150.25 640 E. Eisenhower L{lvd. Petitioner's mailing address Suite A Loveland, Colorado 805.77 ( 03) 667-2968 - Petitioner-as -Telephone No. • , • • • .385 page 2 of 2 . .. - ! x!3$3 • RE_OLUTION .: RE: THE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, 1990, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PETITION OF: KAISER CENTER % BIG R MANUFACTURING P O BOX 1290 GREELEY, CO 80632 DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: PIN ,.. CEL: 096105408005 - GR 128X-2 IMPS ONLY BLK118 & VACATED 3RD AVE $302 6 ST$ WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, _ Colorado, organized as a Board of Equalization for the purpose, of adjusting, equalizing, raising or lowering the assessment - and valuation of real and personal property within- this County, fixed and made by the County Assessor for the year 1990, and 'WHEREAS, said petition has' been heard before, the . County Assessor and due notice of adjustment thereon has been given . to the taxpayer(s) , and WHEREAS, the taxpayer(s) presented,a• pctition oP appeal. to the County Assessor's valuation°•for the'year 1990, Claiming' . grounds for- relief- thereunder' stating the_ property described" . _ in such h-petition was assessed too' high, as more specifically stated in said'petition, ' and WHEREAS, said petitioner beingrepresented by r*orth American Property Consultants who submitted a letter regarding said petition, and WHEREAS, the Board has made its findings on the evidence, testimony and remonstrances and .is now fully informed. - NOW, .THEREFORE, BE -IT RESOLVED by the Board 'of County .Commissioners of weld County,' . acting as ; the Board..- of Equalization, that the evidence presented at the hearing . clearly supported the value placed - upon the Petitioner!s- property by the Weld County Assessor. Such;evidence indicated` • the valuewa> reasonable, equitable .:and: derivedaccording'to the methodologies,13ercentages, figures and fornulas'.dictated'. to the Weld County .Assessor- by law. As such, this: Board findR = that the'Petitioner failed to meet: its burden 'o£ proving that, ' ' the AsWessor's valuation was incorrect.'.-' The "assessment and valuation ,of the Weld County Xssoilsor;shall be, and hereby i.s, z f f i:raidd. - _ r•/'1 ,lnn ,. E A l,�iVEJ �0 Z IJ:iN Page 2 RE: BOE - KAISER CENTER • BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a denial of a petition, in whole or in part, by the Board of Equalization may be appealed by selecting one of the following three options: 1. Board of Assessment Appeals: You have the right to appeal the County Board of Equalization's (CBOE's) decision to the Board of Assessment Appeals (BAA) . Such hearing is the final hearing at which testimony, exhibits or any other evidence may be introduced. If the decision of the BAA is • further appealed to the Court of Appeals, only the record created at the BAA hearing shall be the basis for the Court's decision. No new evidence can be introduced at the court of Appeals. (39-8-108(1) , CRS) Appeals to the BAA must be made on forms furnished by the BAA, and should be mailed or delivered within thirty (3O) days of denial by the CBOE to: Board of Assessment Appeals 1313 Sherman Street, Room 523 Denver, CO 80203 Phone: 866-5880 OR 2 . District Court: You have the right to appeal the, • CBOE's decision to the- District Court of the county wherein yeur:property, is located. New testimony':,exhibits or ,any -. , other evidence' may' `.be. introduced at .the'HDistrict<_Court - hearing. For filing requirements please contact your attorney or the Clerk of the District Court. Further appeal of the District Court's decision is made to the Court of Appeals for a review of the record. (39-8-108 (1) , CRS) OR 3. Bindinu Arbitration:_ You have the right to submit your case . to arbitration. If you' choose this option the arbitrator's decision is final and your right to appeal your current valuation ends. (39-8-108.5, CRS)- Seectincs the arbitrator - In order to pursue arbitration, you must notify the CBOE of your intent. You and the,, CBOE ' select , from the official list of qualified people. _, Ifyouu, cannot agree on an arbitrator, the ' District Court o£ the county in which the property is located will, make the selection. ` Arbitration Hearina Preeedure - Arbitration hearings arc held within sixty days from the date the arbitrator is selected. Both you and the CBOE are entitled to participate. The hearings are informal. The.arbitrator has the authomfty ECENEp . 1,3G 2 C � �' Page 3 RE: BOE - KAISER CENTER to issue subpoenas for witnesses, books, records, documents and other evidence. He also has the power to administer oaths, and all questions of law and fact shall be determined by him. The arbitration hearing may be confidential and closed to the public, upon mutual agreement. The arbitrator's written decision must be delivered to both parties personally or by registered mail within ten (10) days of the hearing. Such decision is final and not subject to review. Fees and Expenses - The arbitrator's fees and expenses are' agreed upon by you and the CBOE. In the case of residential real property, such fees and expenses cannot exceed $150.00 per case. The arbitrator's fees and expenses, not including counsel fees, are to be paid as provided in the decision. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the nth day of Ju , A.D. 199 ATTEST: � fg/a/tu BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 'VUJ� �/ WEL MINTY, C RADO Weld County Clerk to the Board ene .R. Bra ner, .Chairman eputy Clerk to the Board .. !_ct _ t.-47-0L George Kennedy, Pro-Tem APB VED AS TO Constance L. Harbert - - r County Attorney C. W. K3.rby (EXCUSED) Gordon E. Lacy A 1. 1�u o F CS\ ✓� n 'J.Or COLNi 1»LoJ�.t s 8 i 915 10th STREET GREELEY COLORt0O30631 �l NOTICE- OF DENIAL - PHONE(303)3564000 EXT.a_56 ,rickriliraDirtnr-9;.!"IR]:, / GR 128X-2 IMPS ONLY ULK113 L VACATED 3Ra AVc L111 -c3O2 6 ST: COLORADO 3O2 6 ST GREELEY OWNER KAISER caw TER N.A.P.C. PARCEL O961O54O8OO5 • PIN R 2536686 64O E. EISENHOWER' 57Es A YEAR 199O LOVELAND CO 8O537 LOG OO817 - 06/12/1990 The appraised value of property is based on the appropriate consideration of the approaches to value required by lave.The Assessor has determined that your property should be included in the following category(ies): Residential property is valued by considering the cost and market approaches. Agricultural land value is determined solely by the earning or production capacity of the land,capitalized at a rate set by law. -Producing mines are assessed at 25%of the gross proceeds or 100%of the net proceeds,whichever ii greater. -Oil and gas leaseholds and lands are assessed at 87.5% of the gross value of the oil and/or gas sold or transported from the premises on primary production;secondary production is valued at 75%. All other property,including vacant land,is valued by considering the cost,market,and income approaches. If your concern is the amount of your property tax, local taxing authorities (county, city, fire protection, and other special districts) hold ' budget hearings in the fall.Please refer to your tax bill or ask your Assessor fora listing of these districts,and plan to attend these budget hearings. The Assessor has carefully studied all available information, giving particular attention to the specifics included on your protest and has deter- mined the valuation(s) assigned to your property.The reasons for this determination of value are: , WE HAVE REVIEWED YOUR PROPERTY VALUE AND IT IS CORRECT. STATE LAW REQUIRES THAT 1987J1988 COSTa MARKET AND INCOME INFORMATION BE USED 7O ESTABLISH CURRENT VALUES. NO CHANGE HAS BEEN MADE TO THE ACTUAL VALUATION OF THIS PROPERTY. COLORADO LAW REQUIRES U5 7O SEND THIS NOTICE OF DENIAL FOR ALL PROPERTIES ON WHICH WC DO NOT ADJUST THE VALUE. - PETITIONER'S ASSESSOR'S VALUATION PROPERTY CLASSIFICATION ESTIMATE ACTUAL VALUE ACTUAL VALUE OF VALUE PRIOR TO REVIEW AFTER REVIEW LAND 21'PS 30 a 647 3O p 647 LTOTALS S S 3OJ647 S 3O'447 If you disagree with the Assessor's decision,you have the right to appeal to the County Board of Equalization for further consideration, 35;-3-103(1)(a),C.R.S. Pleas°see the back of this form for detailed information on filing your appeal. RICHARD W. KETRNES O:414/9O WBL))COUNTY ASSESSOR DATE 35 15 rorm P AOaa r.,.,.,en.zor e7rvo ADDITIONAL INFOFUJA71O11 ON REVERSE SIDERECEIVED �U'�' t $ �CC� 1 PETITION TO Trir.:. STATE ATE c+OiaSD OF ASSESSMENT; APPEALS Date: August 28 ., 2990 • TO THE HONORABLE BOARD OF ASSESSMENT APPEALS: Your Petitioner, Rig R Mfg. & Dist. Inc. " (name of property owner) Blk 119 W of Ctr. of Riv. — Greeley. CO 80632 (Street address, City, State, Zip Code of subject property) hereby appeals the decision of the (check: one) X County Board of Equalization County Board of Commissioners Property Tax Administrator for property located in the County of Weld that was dated August 17, 1990, concerning (check: one) X Valuation Refund Exemption Abatement for, the year(s) 1990. . DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: (Legal description - if multiple . properties are involved in the one decision being appealed, a listing of the county schedule or parcel numbers with the corresponding properties - must be submitted as are attachment to the petition) PARCEL #096105408009/PIN r 2806886 PROPERTY CLASSIFICATION: This property ie claz__,i4ied 717: . (Please check one) X Commercial Residential X Vacant land Industrial Asricultural Natural Resources Producing Mines • Coil and Gas State Assessed Exempt ATTACHMENTS fro THIS PETITION , FORM: (Please check: of; the attacheents 'you will be using) . X The decision (County Board of Equalization, County Board of Commissioners, or Property Tax Administrator) that is being appealed. This attachment MUST be with the petition in order -For it to be accepted for docketing. X The Assessor 's Notice of Denial. X The facts and law (the issue(s) involved') , en which hi. • appeal is based. C.R.S s9-8-108 (1) X List of witnesses and eXhibits to be used at the hearing. (Per BAA Rule 11 To be determined) ' X Exhibits, if any, to be used at the hearing. (Per BAA :fule 11 To be determined) • ESTIMATED 7IN,E FOR FETITIQNEf,. TO PRESEnT, THE AF'F'PAL: . 60 'Minutes or ; . 1 hours - . . - _ _ . • REFRttENTATIOy: (Please chedk appropriate responses) Peeition'er� 'will be. pre enw"•at the hearing; or— . Petitioner requests that the Hearn rule on the documc,ntcltion . • ubmi teed. Feti ivhc r will be represented by A Colorado Attorney Vie , • no. •_ ,.. • . 41 383 • • page 1 of 2 _' A it:ALE? ;rive (C) copies of this petition form with all attachment's and exhibits. The original (with original signature) plus three entire copies (a total of four (4) ) are to be filed ..with the Board of Assessment Appeals; one entire copy to be filed with: the Respondent (County Board of Equalization, County Commissioners or property Tax Administrator) as shown in Cortificate of Service; and one entire copy ' to be kept for Petitioner 's records. • CERTIFICATE Or SERW.CE certify to the Board of Assessment Appeals that 1 have mailed (or hand delivered) one copy of this petition form, • to ethar with all attachments and exhibits. to the Weld ( indicate] one) County Board of Equalization, County Board of Commissioners, or property Tax Administrator ir. Greeley Colorado, on Ausust 29, 1990. Jul ' - Greni Petitioner ' s signature . Attorney for Petitioner Res. No. 15025 64.0 E. Eisenhower Blvd. Petitioner's mailing address Suite A Loveland, Colorado 80w7 (30' ) 667--8969 Petitioner 's Telephone No. • • #133.`• .�' /383 $ESOLUTION RE: THE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, 1990, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PETITION OF: PETERSON RUSSELL % BIG "R" MANUFACTURING P O BOX 1290 GREELEY, CO 80632 DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: Q 7 2 PARCEL: 096105408009 - GR 127-X ALL BLK119 WO CENTER OF THE CACHE LA POUDRE RIVER WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, organized as a Board of Equalization for the purpose • of adjusting, equalizing, raising or lowering the assessment and valuation of real and personal property within this County, fixed and made by the County Assessor for the year 1990, and WHEREAS, said petition has been heard before the County Assessor and due notice of adjustment thereon has been given to the taxpayer(s) , and WHEREAS, the taxpayer(s) presented a petition of appeal: to the County Assessor's valuation for the year 1990, claiming , grounds for relief thereunder stating the property described in such petition was assessed too high, as more specifically stated in said,petition, and WHEREAS, said petitioner being represented by North American Property Consultants who submitted a letter regarding said petition, and • WHEREAS, the Board has made its findings on the evidence, testimony and remonstrances and is now fully informed. _,. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, acting as the Board of Equalization,- that the evidence presented at the hearing clearly supported the value placed upon the Petitioner's property by the Weld County Assessor. Such evidence indicated the value;was reasonable,, equitable, and derived according-to the methodologies percentages/ figures and formulas dictated to the.Weld. County Assessor-by law.` As such, .this Board-finds that the' Petitioner failed. to meet its burden- of proving:that • the . AsSeiSer's valuation was incorrect. The assessment and valuation"of the Weld County:A,.ses oz shall be, and hereby is, aftirmed. ,• • • • ‘ Cr-IVED AUG 2 L. a„(1 f) • Page 2 RE: BOE - PETERSON FJSSELL BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a denial of a petition, in whole or in part, by the Board of Equalization may be appealed by selecting one of the following three ,options: 1. Board of Assessment Appeals: You have the right_to appeal the County Board of Equalization's (CBOE's) decision to the Board of Assessment Appeals (BRA), Such hearing is the final hearing at which, testimony, . exhibits or any other • evidence may be introduced. If the decision of the BAA is further appealed to the Court of Appeals, only the record created at the BAA hearing shall be the basis for the Court's decision. No new evidence can be introduced at the Court_ of Appeals. (39-8-108(1) , CRS) Appeals to the BAA must be made,,on forms furnished by . the BAA, and should be mailed or delivered within thirty`(30) • i days of denial by the CBOE to: Board of Assessment Appeals 1313 Sherman Street, Room 523 Denver, CO 80203 Phone: 866-5880 • OR 2. :DisriQt_Lourt: You have the' right to _appeal the • . ;{ CBOE's decision :to District Court of the` countycyherein your , property , is '.1ocated. New: testimony, "exhibits orrany .other evidence' may be introduced at" the '_District '^.Court ; hearin - , g.` ;For filing requirements,please contact yourattorney •- ; or the Clerk of the District Court. ` Further appeal of the District Court's decision is made to the Court of Appeals for a review of the record. (39-8-108 (1) , CRS) OR , 3. Fein ing ArbiLt, ation: You have the right to submit your case to arbitration. If you choose this option ' the arbitrator's decision is final and, your right to appeal your' _ current valuation ends. (39-8-108.5, CRS) Selecting the Arbitrator -:In. order to pursue .• . arbitration, you-must notify the CBOE:of your, intent.-, You and the CBOE select an arbitrator'-.from the official list ^'of qualified -people. If you cannot agreeAdn,an_ arbitrator, .the.: District Court of the. eounty in which the property is" located will make the .selection. Arbitration HeNarinq Procedvtq '-' Arbitration hearings • arc held within sixty days from the date, the arbitrator is selected. Both you.. and the CBOE are entitled to participate. The hearing:. are informal. Ihe' arbitrator has the authority • t�C�l�'tCl r_Vjb Z iJQ� Page 3 . RE: BOE - PETERSON RUSSELL to issue subpoenas for witnesses, ' books, records, documents and other evidence. He also has the power to administer, oaths, and all questions of law and fact shall be determined by him. , The arbitration hearing may be confidential and closed to the public, upon mutual agreement. The arbitrator's written decision must be delivered to both parties personally or by registered mail within ten (10) days of the hearing. Such decision is final, and not subject to review. gees and Expenses - The arbitrator's fees and expenses are agreed upon by you and the OBOE. In the case of residential real property, such fees and expenses cannot exceed S150.00 per case. The arbitrator's fees and expensesi not including counsel fees, are to be paid as provided in the • decision. , The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motiorLduly '` made and seconded, adopted bey the following vote on the;27th day of au y, A.D. 19 O. , ATTEST: :di BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS . 'V �1 WEL UNTX, C DORADO t Weld County Clerk to the' Board +. . ; ene R. Brantner, Chairman . , ,eputy Clerk to the Board 4.4-.-.--,..rr; George Kennedy, Pro Tem �RCvBD AS TO FORM- C„..„.e.e..--flc--- -...z,e-e-- , vL�� nstance Le Harbb;, , �- g7/ County Attorney C. W. Kirby / (EXCUSSO) .. . - Gordon E. Lacy n . ^� gCEi�'�� ?J5 2 915 10th STREET _ _ GRECLLY,COLORADO 80651 _NOTICE OF DENIAL �� ` NIONE (303)3564000. EXT.a_!5 ili'lI ` i!hr31 Y'..�. OR 127^X ALL IILX119 u OF C£NT_r2 CF THE CAC1sL 1i LA PCUDRE RIVER COLCRADO OWNER PETERSON RUSSELL N.A.P.C. , PARCEL , ; ' 096105403009 PIN R 2836886 640 E. EISENHOWER, STE. A YEAR .1990 LOVELAND CO 30537 LOG 00823 06/12/1990 The appraised value of property is based on the appropriate consideration of the approaches to value required by law.The Assessor has deterrnmtd that your property should be included in the following eategory(ies): Residential property is valued by considering the cost and market approaches, -Agricultural land value is determined solely by the earning or production capacity of the land,capitalized at a rate set by law, _Producing mines are assessed at 25%of the gross proceeds or 700%of the net proceeds,whichever is greater. -Oil and gas leaseholds and lands are assessed at 87,5% of the gross value of the oil and/or gas sold or transported from the premises on primary production;secondary production is valued at 75%. All other property,including vacant land,is valued by considering the cost,market,and income approaches. If your concern is the amount of your property tax, local taxing authorities (county, city, fire protection, and othor special districts) hold hudgat hearings in the fall. Please refer to your tax bill or ask your Assessor fora listing of these district,and plan to attend these budget hearings. The Assessor has carefully studied all available information, giving particular attention to the specifics included on your protest and has deter- mined the valuation(s)assigned to your property.The reasons for this determination of value are: NO CHANGE HAS SE£N MADE TO THE ACTUAL VALUATIONOF THIS PROPERTY. COLORADO LAN REQUIRES US TO SEND THIS NOTICE OF DENIAL FOR ALL . PROPERTIES ON WHICH WE DO NOT ADJUST THE VALUE, ASSESSORS VALUATION PETITIONER'S 1 - 'PROPERTY CLASSIFICATION CLASSIFiCAT10N ESTIMATE ACTUAL VALUE ACTUAL VALUE - _ OF VALUE PRIOR 70 REVIEW AFTER REVIEW LAND 10, 528 10, 52d IMPS R�„E1�,�0 ��` 2 0 1590 I L TOTALS $ $ 10 528 S 10352a 5 d � Ir you disacree with the Assessor's decision,you have the right to appeal to the County Board of Equalization for further consideration, 3'i-3.10G(1)(a),C.R.S. Please see the back of this form for detailed information on filing your appeal. �./: RICHARD W KEIR\ES or,/, vso WELD COUNTY ASSESSOR DATE 5Onn Perm 0R-707 P7/90 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON REVERSE SIDE -cT: ION TO T hE STATE BOARD OF ASSESSMENT APPEALS Date: August 28 , 1990 TO Tri . HONORABLE BOARD Or ASSESSMENT APPEALS: Your Petitioner, Rim R Mfg. & Dist. Inc. (name of property owner) _ 600 4th Ave. — Greeley, CO 80632 (Street address, City, State, Zip Code of subject property) hF.Droby appeals the decision of the (check One) X County Board of Equalization _County Board of Commissioners Property Tax Administrator for property lozated in the County of Weld `ho..t was dated August 17, 1990, concerning (chec : one) X Valuation _Refund Exemption _Abatement for the yearis) 1940. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: (Legal description — if multiple properties arc involved in the one decision being appealed, a listing of the county schedule or parcel numbers with the corresponding properties — must be submitted as an attachment to the petition) PARCEL #096105408010/PIN R 2836986 RRCPERTY CLASSIFICATION: This property is classified as: (Please check one) X _Commercial Residential Vacant land _Industrial ,Agricultural Natural Resources _producing Mines Oil and Sas SL-ate Assessed Exempt ATTACHMENTS TO THIS PETITION FORM: (Please check off the attachments you will be using) X The decision (County Board of Equalization, County Board of Commissioners, or Property Tax Administrator) that is being appealed. ThiT attachment _MI1,41T be with the petition in order for it to be of:cePted for docketins, X The Ae es_or ' ., Notice of Denial . X Tho -facts- and law (the issuo(s) involved) , on which this appeal is based. C.R.S 39-8-108 (1) X List of witnesses and exhibits to be used at the hearins. (Per BAA Rule 11 To be determined) X Exhibits, if any, to be used at the hearing. (Per BAA Rule 11 To be determined) ESTIMATED TIME FOR PETITIONER TO PRESENT THE APPEAL: 60 minutes or 1 hours REPRESENTATION: (Plo&se check appropriate responses) Petitioner will be pre:Atrnt at the hearing, or Petitioner requests that the Board rule on the documentation, submitted. Potitioner will by rreoret;ontod by a Colorado, Attorney X yes, _ no. :1 CSO purge 1 of 2 . i Make rive. (5) copies of this, petition form with all attachments and exhibits. The original (with original signature) plug three entire copies (a total of four (4) ) are to be filed 'with the board of Assessment Appeals; one entire copy to be filed with the Respondent (County Hoard of Equalization, County Commissioners or property Tax Administrator) as shown in Certificate of service; and one entire copy to be kept for petitioner 's records. CERTIFTCAT7 CP SERVICE I certify to the board of Assessment Appeals that I have mailed (or hand delivered) one copy of this petition form, together with all attachments and exhibits, to the Weld ( indicate one) County Board of Equalization, County Beard of Ccmmisb ioners, or Property Tag Administrator in Greeley . Colorado, on August 29, 1990. / 1 C ` � . y- Jul e Greni� petitioner 's signature Attorney for—1—"-"A4— Attorney r Reg. No. 1502.5 640 E. Eisenhower Blvd, Petitioner's mailing address Suite A Loveland, Colorado 80537 . ,.(303) 667-8968 Petitioner 's Telephone" No. f;1383 pc‘su 2 of 2 . �i� J • • % 1�3J BEsmdJTION RE: THE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, 1990, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PETITION OF: PETERSON RUSSELL % BIG "R" MANUFACTURING P O BOX 1290 GREELEY, CO 80632 .w !".'..n��...".�� DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: P111%28:36,98.n �-� — GR 128—X ALL BLK118 & VAC 3RD AV ALSO PORTION OF VAC 6 ST EXC BEG SW COR BLX118 E150' N200' W150' S200' TO BEG (IMPS ONLY #GR128-X3 BIG R MFG & DIST INC) $600 4 AVt WHEREAS, the Board o£ County Commissioners of Weld County, ' I Colorado, organized as a Board of Equalization for the purpose of adjusting, equalizing, raising or lowering the assessment and valuation of seal and personal property within this County, fixed and made by the County Assessor for the year 1990, and WHEREAS, said petition has been heard before the County Assessor and due notice of adjustment thereon has been given to the taxpayer(s) , and ` " 1 WHEREAS, .the..taxpayer(s) , presented a petition of -appeal to -the County, Asses or's valuation_for the,year 1990, -claiming . : grounds-for relie£ `' hereunder. stating` the property deseribed - in such petition was .assessed too high, as 'more specifically stated in said petition, and . WHEREAS, said petitioner being represented by North American Property Consultants who submitted a letter regarding . said petition, and WHEREAS, the Board has made its findings on the evidence, - testimony and remonstrances and 'is-now fully informed. . ' NOW,-, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by -the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, acting as the Board of , Equalization, that the evidence presented at the- hearing ' clearly :supported.: the ',value - placed upon the Petitioner's propertIkby the Weld. County Assessor.- Such evidence indicated the value.`was reasonable,≤ equitable, ' and derived according: to the methodologies`, percentages, figures anciformulas dictated ' • 'eo the-,Weld--CountyAssessor by law:' As such; this Board finds that the Petitioner. failed to meet its burden of proving that the Assessor's valuation was incorrect* :The assessment, and valuation of. thc'Weld County A:SseMsor`shall be, and hereby is, • tt�L.-IV70 aUc L U ;au Page 2 RE: BOE - PETERSON RUSSELL BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a denial of a petition, in whole or in part, by the Board of Equalization may be appealed by selecting one of the following three options: 1. Board of Assessment Apnea's: You have the right to appeal the County Board of Equalization's (CBOE's) decision to the Board of Assessment Appeals (BAA) . Such hearing is the final hearing at which testimony, exhibits or any other evidence may be introduced. If the decision of the BAA is further appealed to the Court of Appeals, only the record created at the BAA hearing shall be the basis for the Court's decision. No new evidence can be introduced at the Court of i Appeals. (39-8-108(1) , CRS) Appeals to the BAA must be made on forms furnished by the BAA, and .should be mailed or delivered within thirty (30) days of denial by the CBOE to: i Board of Assessment Appeals 1313 Sherman Street, Room 523 Denver, CO 80203 , i Phone: 866-5880 y oR 1 2. piztrist _ColArt: You have the right to appeal'`the CBOE's decision to the District Court of the count Wherein'y• � your property is located. New testimony,• exhibits ,or ir any other evidence may; be introduced`. at,- the District Court t hearing. ; For filing requirements please contact your attorney ' " or .the Clerk of the District Court. . Further appeal , of the District Court's decision is made to the Court of Appeals for a review of the record. (39-8-108(1) , CRS) • OR 3. Bind ng Arbitration: You have" the right to .submit your case to arbitration.- If you choose -,this,:optidn:-the arbitrator's decision is final and your: right to appeal your current,valuation ends. (39-8-108.5, CRS) t Selecting the Arbitrator - In order to pursue- j arbitration, you must notify the CBOE of your intent., You and + the CBOE " select an arbitrator front t_.he,, official ';list -of qualified people. If you cannot agree on an arbitrator, the District Court of the county in which the property is. located will. make the selection. A,_rbitra_tion Herring Prslesi o :�- Arbitration hearings arc held within sixty days from the date the arbitrator is selected. Both you and the CBOE are entitled .to participate. The hearings are infor^al. The arbitrator has the authority _ r cC�t�'rn AvG 2 e ;�; Page 3 RE: BOE - PETERSON RUSSELL to issue subpoenas for witnesses, books, records, documents and other evidence. He also has the power to administer oaths, and all questions of law and fact shall be determined by him. The arbitration hearing may be confidential and closed to the public, upon m'-xtual agreement. The arbitrator's written decision must be delivered to both parties personally or by registered mail within ten (10) days of the hearing. Such decision is final, and not subject to review. � . s Fees and Exoentires - The arbitrator's fees and expenses are agreed upon by you and the CBOE. In the case of residential real property, such fees and expenses cannot exceed $150.00 per case. The arbitrator's fees and expenses, not including counsel fees, are to be paid as provided in the decision. } The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 2,7th f day of J y, A.D , 19 O. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COM'dISSIONERS . t7ELD LINTY, COLORADO.,. Weld County Clerk to the Board ' 3 Ater 1 en R.„ Brant rye , airAan Deputy Clerk to he Board / Ge ge Xennedy, Pro-Tem A_ERR ED AS TO FORM: L r_e � Constance L. _Hartiert t//, f'- JFy/, / 2 C`�/ County Attorne C. W. Kirby / f Gordan E. Lacy • 9� O Nub C.G,N? , sit . 3 Xn 92510th STRICT 1 6) GREELEY.coLORnD08,0631 NOTICE OF DENIAL / PtIONE 00313564000 EXT.4:56 r z"077 r ‘Pi P O I, G: 128-X ALL DLK118 L VAC 3RD AV ALSO PORTION OF VAC 6 ST E-XC DEG SW CDR s3LK118 E1503 7200' COLORADO W1503 Stool TC DEG (IMPS ONLY SGRi2d-X3 310 R MFG L DIST INC) 3600 4 AV-a • 600 4 AV GREELEY 01ibiER PETERSON RUSSELL ti.A.PC. PARCEL 096105408010 PIN R 2836986 640 E. EISENHOWER' STE. A YEAR 1990 LOVELAND CO 40537 LOG 00818 06/12/1990 The appraised value of property is based on the appropriate consideration of the approaches to value required by law.The Assessor has determined that your property should be included in the following eategory(ies): —Residential property is valued by considering the cost and market approaches. —_Agricultural land value is determined solely by the earning or production capacity of the land,capitalized at a rate set by law. Producing mines are assessed at 25%of the gross proceeds or 100%of the net proceeds,whichever is greater. Oil and gas leaseholds and lands are assessed at 67.5% of the gross value of the oil and/or gas sold or transported from the premises on primary production;secondary production is valued at 75%. ' All other property,including vacant land,is valued by considering the cost,market,and income approaches. If your concern is the amount of your property tax, local taxing authorities (county, city, fire protection, and other special districts) hold budget hearings in the fail.Please refer to your tax bill or ask your Assessorfora listing of these districts,and plan to attend these budget hearings. The Assessor has carefully studied all available information, giving particular attention to the specifics included on your protest and has deter- mined the valuations) assigned your property.The reasons for this determination of value are: WE HAVE REVIEWED YOUR PROPERTY VALUE AND IT IS CORRECT. STATE LAW REQUIRES THAT 1987/1988 COST, MARKET AND INCOME INFORMATION DE USED TO ESTABLISH CURRENT VALUES. NO CHANGE HAS SECtt MADE TO THE ACTUAL VALUATION OF THIS PROPERTY. COLORADO LAW REQUIRES LfS TO SEND THIS NOTICE OF DENIAL FOR ALL PROPERTIES ON WHICH WE DO NOT ADJUST THE VALUE. • • • PETITIONER'S 1 ASSESSOR'S VALUATION PROPERTY CLASSIFICATION ESTIMATE I ACTUAL VALUE ACTUAL VALUE I OF VALVE PRIOR TO REVIEW AFTER REVIEW LAND 873515 873515 IMPS 913311 913311 • TOTALS S $ 1783 826 S 1733826 If yer disagree with the Assessor's decision,you have tho right to appeal to the County Board of Equalization for further consideration, 30•:; 10G;1)(a),C.R.S, Please see tho back of this form for detailed information on filing your appeal. �y. RICHARD W. T;EIRNES _ /i4/Qo WELD COL\'TY ASSESSOR DATE 48 13•DFT-AD 1 IC 1 RECEIVED Jill.. n *oo (Irk' rsrr• rn-o7C7190 • ADDITI0NAL ORh1ATfOh1O� REVcRS� S1D i . lu PETITION TO THE STATE BOARD OF ASSESSMENT APPEALS Date: August ZS , 1990 TO THE HONORABLE BOARD OF ASSESSMENT APPEALS: Your Petitioner, Bip R Mfg. & Dist. Inc. (name of property owner) ids only of Rlk 118 •- Greeley, CO 80632 (Street address, City, State, Zip Code of subject property) , hereby ah'F-'eals the decision of the (check. one) . X ^ "nty Board of Equalization County Board of Commissioners _ i _Property Tax Administrator l'or property located in the County of . Weld that was dated Aga ust 17, 1990, concerning (check one) i X Valuation Refund Exemption Abatement 1 for the year (s) 1994. l DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: (Legal description - if multiple 1 properties are involved in the one decision being appealed, a listing of the county schedule or parcel numbers with the corresponding properties - must be submitted as an attachment to the petition) PARCEL #096105408012/PTN R 2837186 '.r PROPERTY CLASSIFICATION: This property is -classified as: (Please check ones) X Commercial Residential Vacant land Industrial 4 Agricultural Natural Resources Producing Mines 1 Oil and Gras Stag. Assessed Exempt : . J . 1 ATTACHMENTS TO THIS PETITION FoRm. (Please check off the r attachments you will be using) . , ' Y. Thedecision (County Soars of Egualisation, - County Poard of - 4 Coeamiasionet,z, or, Pr�vp r,ty Tzlx Administrator) that is being . Appealed. T:lis attachment MUpT be with the petition in order for it to be. av7epted for docE.etins. ' X The As=,iessrr•'s Notice or Denial. 1 X 7f'c facts and pair the 1s5"uo(s) involved) , on which this .i e appeal is based. C.R.S :9--8-108 C1) . - X Last Of witnes5e=, and exhibits to be us2d at the hoar"ing. (Per BAA Rule 11 To be determined) 4 X '' b i t� i f any, to be used at the hearing; •�".,�i� , Y, •ink (PerDAA Rule 11 To be determined) 'l ESTIMATED TIME FOR PETITIONER TO PRESENT THE APPEAL: . • 60 minutes or - 1 hours . `•:EPRES 2NT<ATION: (Please check arpropriato' responses) -• Petitioner will bra 'pr`esr�nt . sit the heairing, or, . .. . . �...• Petitioner requests nests. that the Scard rule on the ' documentation • • rc';i ti.t-4iler• will be t''�rpr'c8f_:n 1 Ed. i y a C>^ •.4 • r 5 Colorado .Attorney A orney _X,y :. no. r<<ga .1 of • ;iiw3;� . r. • • lrichke five (5) copies of this petition form with till att.Achment:i and exhibits. The original (with original signature) plus three entire copies (a total of four (4) ) are to be filed with this Board of Assessment Appeal:; one entire copy to be filed with the Respondent (County Board of Equalization, County Commissioners or Property Tax Administrator) as shown in Certificate of Service:; and one entire copy to be kept for Petitioner 's records. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify to -the Board of Assessment Appeals that I have mailed (or hand delivered) one copy of this petition form, together with all attachments and exhibits, to the Weld ( indicate oncA County Board of Equalization, County Board of Commissioners, or Property Tax Administrator in greelev Colorado, on August 29, 1990. Jv •:e Croni Petitioner's signature • Attorney for 2titioner Res. No. 15025 • 640 E. Eisenhower Blvd. Petitioner's mailing address Suite A Loveland, Colorado 605?7 (.303)• 667-8969 • . • Petitioner's Telephone No. � • • • • 41,1.7� 7 • p._ gc 2 cr r 2 �r3S3 RESONTION RE: THE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, 1990, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PETITION OF: BIG R MANUFACTURING & DISTRIBUTING INC P O BOX 1290 _ GREELEY, CO 80632 M •••�� wtjrTCT,C` ' DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: PigratRCEL: 096105408012 - GR 128-X3 IMPS ONLY PT BLAND OWNER #GR128X PETERSON) WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, ' Colorado, organized as a Board of Equalization for the purpose of adjusting, equalizing, raising or lowering the assessment and valuation of real and personal property within this County, fixed and made by the County Assessor for the year 1990, and i WHEREAS, said petition has been heard before the County Assessor and due notice of adjustment thereon has been given to the taxpayer(s) , aid r WHEREAS, the tarpayer(s) presented a petition of appeal -+ to the County Assessor's valuation for the year 1990, claiming grounds_ for •relief'. thereunder stating_-the property'described in such petition-was assessed too high, as more specifically stated in said petition, and WHEREAS, said . petitioner being.',represented by . North American Property Consultants who submitted a letter regarding said petition, and 1 WHEREAS, the Board has made its findings on the evidence, { testimony and remonstrances and is now fully informed. � i NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County _ Commissioners of Weld County,- . acting as the - Board .of 1 Equalization, that the evidence .presented at the hearing j clearly supported the value placed. upon. the.' Petitioners property by the Weld County Assessor._ Such evidence indicated the value was reasonable,; equitable,-and derived according:to j the methodologies, percentages, -figures and formulas dictated - ; to the Weld County Assessor by law. , As such, this Boardifinds that the. Petitioner failed.to meet its burden, of 'proving that the Assessor's valuation. was incorrect. - The assessment and valuation of the Weld County A lesser.-6Mall be, and hereby; is, a�farmed. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a denial • of a petition, in whole or in part, by the Board of Equalization maybe appealed by selecting one of the following three options: cl ro`•IC7 .••1\1 rL r • Page 2 • RE: BOE - BIG R MANUFACTURING & DISTRIBUTING INC 1. Board of Assessment Avveals: You have the right -to appeal the County Board of Equalization's (CBOE's) decision to the Board of Assessment Appeals (BAA) . Such hearing is the final hearing at which testimony, exhibits or any other evidence may be introduced. If the decision of the BAA is further appealed to the Court of Appeals, only the record created at the BAA hearing shall be the basis for the Court's decision. No new evidence can be introduced at the Court of Appeals. (39-8-108(1) , CRS) i Appeals to the BAA must be made on forms furnished by ; the BAA, and should be mailed or delivered within thirty (30) days of denial by the CBOE to: Board of Assessment Appeals 1313 Sherman Street, Room 523 { Denver, CO 80203 - s Phone: 866-5880 OR 2. District Court: You have the right to ,appeal the CBOE's . decision. to, the. District Court of the county wherein. • your property is located. New testimony, exhibits or any others avidence :May •beintroduced at .the . District Court hearing., ..For,Piling,requirements please contact your attorney or the Clerk of' the District Court. Further appeal ,of, .the - District.Court's `decis .on:.is made to the Court of Appeals for a review of the record. (39-8-108(1) , CRS) OR - _ t 3. Bindi a Arbitration: You have the right to submit your ease, to arbitration. If you choose this option the arbitrator's decision is final and your right to appeal your _ __. . current valuation ends. (39-8-108.5, CRS) Selecting the Arbitrator - In order to pursue. arbitration, you must.notify the CBOE of your intent. You and the CBOE :select an arbitrator from the official list ' of , qualified':people. : If you 'cannot agree on .an arbitrator; the District ;Court of the county in which the property is located • will make the selection. • 1101.tration Mead a Procedure - Arbitration hearings are held within sixty;days ; from' the date the arbitrator is - selected ';:• Both you and the OBOE are entitled to participate_ The hearings are informal.. The arbitrator has the authority n r •\ Page 3 RE: BOB - BIG R MANUFACTURING & DISTRIBUTING INC to issue subpoenas for witnesses, books, records, documents and other evidence. He also has the power to administer oaths, and all questions of law and fact shall be determined by him. The arbitration hearing may be confidential and closed to the public, upon mutual agreement. The arbitrator's written decision must be delivered to both parties personally or by registered mail within ten (10) days of the hearing. Such decision is ,final and not subject to review. Fees and Expenses - The arbitrator's fees and expenses are agreed upon by you and the CBOE. In the case of residential real property, such fees and expenses cannot; exceed $150.00 per case. The arbitrator's fees and expenses, not including counsel fees, are to be paid as provided in the decision. -The above and foregoing ' Resolution was, on motion duly - made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the Zab, . day of J y, A.D. 19 0. ATTEST: �� BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD LINTY, COLORADO. Weld County Clerk to the Board 1/4 ` ene R. Branther, Chairman eputy clerk to the Board �� ! ' Geor" ge Ken eM , Pro o--Tem AP VED AS TO FORM: ^ , r r- i /.12.,r Constance L. Harbert - / / f‘ �, County Attorn� C. W. Kirby (EXCUSED) Gordon E. Lacy r ,..�,kW:,. 3 n ;��CVN C� rir.. . ' OF FICE OF COUNTY ASSES50% \...._ /363 "s 10th STREET ' _ .. . GREELEY.COLORADO 80431 NOTICE OF DENIAL �--- - PHONE(103)356-4000. EXT.Cf6 � k,,[ .qt l in, t.. As, r� GR 128-X3 I:1PS CNLY PT ELK 113 MAN3 C4:1ER 3GR123X „iA� ��f 11'i W t.]w,t ' PETERS Oft) COLORADO • 600 4 AV GREELEY DUNER DIG R MANUFACTURING L DISTRIBUTING INC N.A.PC. PARCEL 096105408012 PIN k 2337166 t 640 E. EISENHOWER; STE. A YEAR 1990 LOVELAND CO 80537 LCG 00829 - 06/12/1990 The appraised value of property is based on the appropriate consideration of the approaches t0 value required by law.The Assessor has determinea j that your property should be included in the following category(iesl: Residential property is valued by considering the cost and market approaches. Agricultural land value is determined solely by the earning or production capacity of the land,capitalized at a rate set by law. _Producing mines are assessed at 25%of the gross proceeds or 100%of the net proceeds,whichever is greater. Oil and gas leaseholds and lands are assessed at 87.5% of the gross value of the col and/or gas sold or transported from the premises on primary production;secondary production is valued at 75%. 1 _All other property,including vacant land,is valued by considering the cost,market,and income approaches. } If your concern is the amount of your property tax, local taxing authorities (county, city, fire protection, and other special districts) hold I budget hearings in the fall.Please refer to your tax bill or ask your Assessor for a listing of these districts,and plan to attend these budget hearings. The Assessor has carefully studied all available information, giving particular attention to the specifics included on your protest and has deter- mined the valuation(s) assigned to your property.The reasons for this determination of value are: WE HAVE REVIEWED YOUR PROPERTY VALUE.. AND IT IS CORRECT. STATE LAW , REQUIRES THAT 1987/1988 COST; MARKET AND INCOME INFORMATION DE USED TO ESTADLISH CURRENT VALUES. • NO CHANGE HAS BEEN MADE TO THE ACTUAL VALUATION OF THIS PROPERTY. COLORADO 'LAW REQUIRES US TO SEND THIS NOTICE OF DENIAL FOR ALL PROPERTIES ON WHICH WE DO NOT ADJUST THE VALUE. {I _i 'ASSESSORS VALUATION PETITIONER'S ( j. PROPCRTV CLASSIFICATION I ESTIMATE 1 ACTUAL VALUE ACTUAL VALUE I t - _. OF VA CUE - PRIOR TO REVIEW - AFTER REVIEW I ILARD 1, I IMPS 61;076 61;076 cs TOTALS S S ,61 076 S 617076 j I;you dis,gree with the Assessor's decision,you have the i,ht to appeal to the County Coard of Equalization for further consideration, V C•1CG(1)(a),C.R.S. Please sec the back of this form for detailed information on filing your appeal. RICHARD \V. KE RN:ES Ey:�ti__ COUNTY ASSESSOR - 04/13./.4.3.0______ . DATEi rs-t-PT•A0 .7.'7,,r0 AADDITIONALI1 0R'"AT!oas ON ��r��C CtRECEIVED JUN � S 1.953 anjk. v r 'T N TO STATE • C S �'� I0 -��E BOARD FD OF ASSESSMENT APPEALS Date: August 28 , 1990 TO THE HONORABLE BOARD OF ASSESSMENT APPEALS: Your Petitioner, China Dragon Ent Inc. /Dinner Inv Company (name of property owner) 1540 8th Ave. — Greeley, CO 80631 (Street address, City, State, Zip Code of subject property) hereby appeals the decision of the (check one) X County Board of Equalization County Board of Commissioners _Property Tax Administrator for property located in the County of Weld that was dated August 17, 1990, concerning (check one) X Valuation _Refund _Exemption _Abatement for the year (s) 1990. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: (Legal description - if multiple properties are involved in the one decision being appealed, a listing of the county schedule or parcel numbers with the corresponding properties - must be submitted as an attachment to the petition) PARCEL 3:096108225005/PIN R 3266186 PROPERTY CLASSIFICATION: This property is classified as: (Please check ene) X Commercial _Residential Vacant land _Industrial Agricultural Natural Resources _Producing Mines _Oil and Gas _State Assessed _ Exempt ATTACHMENTS TO THIS PETITION FORM: (Please check off the .attachments you will be using) X The decision (County Board of Equalization, County Board of Commissioners, or Property Tax Administrator) that is being appealed. This attachment MIDST be with the petition in order for it to be accepted for docketing. X The Assessor 's Notice of Denial . X The facts and law (the issue (s) involved) , on which this appeal is based. C.R.S 39-8-108 (1) X List of witnesses and exhibits to be used at the hearing. (Per BAA Rule 11 To be determined) X Exhibits, if any, to be used at the hearing. (Per BAA Rule 11 To be determined) ESTIMATED TIME FOR PETITIONER TO PRESENT THE APPEAL: 60 minutes or 1 hours REPRESENTATION: (Please check appropriate responses) Petitioner will be present at the hearing, or Petitioner requests that the Board rule on the documentation submitted. Petitioner will be represented by a Colorado Attorney _ y', _.-.no. 41667 pa;c 1 of 2 r^ ke five (5) copies of this ;petition form with al : attachments and exhibits. The original (with original signature) plus three entire copies (a total of four (4) ) are to be filed wish the Board of Assessment Appeals; ono entire copy to be filed with the Respondent (County Board of Equalization, County Commissioners or Property Tax Administrator) as shown in Certificate of Service; and one entire copy to be kept for Petitioner 's records. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify to the Board of Assessment Appeals that I have mailed (or hand delivered) one copy of this petition form, together with all attachments and exhibits, to the Weld ( indicate one) County Board of Equalization, County Board of Commissioners, or Property Tax Administrator in Greeley Colorado, on August 29, 1990. ,-1 Julie Greni Petitioner 's signature Attorney for Pdtitioner- Reg. No. 15022 640 E. Eisenhower- Blvd. Petitioner's mailing address Suite A Loveland, Colorado G0537 ( 0.7) 667-896G Petitioner's Telephone No. 01667 Faso 2 of -#.766,7 RES9TXT19N. RE: THE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, 1990, : WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PETITION OF: DINNER INV COMPANY . 630 GREELEY`NATL PLAZA GREELEY, CO 80631 - ., DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: PIN:, 2 "2 CEL: 096108225005 GR 3312 ALL THAT PT L25 W OF W `YN OF ALLEY & ALL L26 TO 36BLK165 ELMWOOD & A STRIP 20.8FT WIDE ADJ 33 ON S SIDE & EXTENDING TO N LN OF 25 TO 32 STRIP BEING VACATED ALLEY%1540 8TH AVE% WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, organized as a Board of Equalization for the purpose of adjusting, equalizing, raising or lowering the assessment and valuation of-real.-and personal property within this County, fixed and made ,by the: County Assessor for the year 1990, and WHEREAS, said petition has been heard before the County Assessor and due notice of adjustment thereon has been given to the taxpayer(s) , end ' WHEREAS, the. taxpayer(s) presented a petition of.'appeal to the County Assessorls"valuation"for' the year 1990, claiming grounds for relief thereunder stating the property described in such petition !as assessed.too 'high; as more specifically stated in said petition, and WHEREAS, said petitioner being represented by . North American Property Consultants who submitted a letter regarding said petition, and WHEREAS, the Board has made its findings on the evidence, - testimony and remonstrances and is now fully informed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld . County, acting as the Board of Equalization, that the 'evidence , presented , at the hearing . clearly .supported' the jValue placed -upon the Potitioner.'s property by the Weld County Assessor:" Such'evidence -indicated • the value was 'reasonablei, equitabl'e, and ,derived according to the methodologies, percentages, figures and formulas dictated` to the Weld County A ,sessor'by Jaw.- As-such, this Board finds that the petitioner failed to meet its burden of proving'-that " the Assessor's valuation 'was: incorrect The assessment:and valuation of the Weld County ASscssor' shall be, and hereby-is .f'irMcd. ' '( GCE J ,z n ��G1 ', 40 :-. • Page 2 RE: BOE - DINNER INV COMPANY BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a denial of a petition, in whole or in part, by the Board of Equalization may be appealed by selecting one -of the following three options: Board_ of Appeals: You have the right to appeal the County Board of Equalization's (CBOE's) decision to the Board of Assessment Appeals (BAA) . Such hearing is the gin.Al hearing ' at which testimony, exhibits or any other evidence may be introduced. If the decision of the BAA is further appealed to the Court of Appeals, only the record created at the BAA hearing shall be the basis for the Court's decision. No new evidence can be introduced at the Court of Appeals. (39-8-108(1) , CRS) Appeals to the BAA must be made on forms furnished by the BAA, and should be mailed or delivered within thirty (30) days of denial by the CBOE to: Board of Assessment Appeals 1313 Sherman Street, Room 523 Denver, CO 80203 Phone: 86675880 OR - 2. District' Court: You have the right to appeal the CBOE's, decision to the District: Court, of. the county wherein your;: property is located.-.New-testimony;-exhibits or_-any, - other -evidence may be' introduced at, the District Court hearing: ` For filing requirements please contact your attorney or the Clerk of the District Court. Further appeal of the • District Court's decision is made to the Court of Appeals for a review of the record. (39-8-108 (1) , CRS) OR 3. }'ending Arbitration: You have the right to submit your- ease to arbitration.- If you choose this option the arbitrator's decision is final and your right to appeal your current•valuation ends. : (39-8-108.5, CRS) ' . Seines In order to pursue arbitration,, you must notify the CBOE of your intent. You and the CBOE select an arbitrator from the official list of qualified people. If- you _cannot agree on an arbitrator; the •District: COurt of 'the county in which the property is located will make th.: selection., agbi.tratIpp Hoaxing ammay_c2 - Arbitration hearings are held within sixty days from the date the arbitrator is mgrs selected. Both you, and the CBOE arc entitled to par�Z4�1.,�c-#4x: �. ""� The hearings are 'informal. The arbitrator has 5gAliUabrity Page 3 RE: BOE - DINNER INv COMPANY to issue subpoenas for witnesses, books, records, documents and other evidence. He also has the power to administer oaths, and all questions of law and fact shall be determined by him. The arbitration hearing may be confidential and closed to the public, upon mutual agreement. The arbitrator's written decision must be delivered to both parties personally or by registered mail within ten (10) days of the hearing. Such decision is final and not subject to review. Fees and Exaenses The arbitrator's fees and expenses are agreed upon by you and the CBOE. In the case of residential real property, such fees and expenses -cannot exceed $150.00 per case. The arbitrator's fees and expenses, - not including counsel fees, are to be paid as provided, in the decision. • A The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by. the following vote on the '27tD day of J y, A.D. 19 0.ATTEST: / 4424; BOARD F COUNTY COMISSIONERS WELD Y, COLORADO • Weld County Clerk •to the Board ' „ `� Gene. R. Bran n ry Chairman eputy clerk tQ the Board -- Georgedy, Pro- em A Vc D AS TO FORM: A / `✓, t t, �, .Harbert �f / , "`---CCCons a�ncye L. �H/arb�rt County Attorney c. w. Kirby / (EXCCJSEDS• :Gordon E. Lacy `' -�:.1\� e • FC‘ �tlG 2 41 3. • • 935 1Gtn jTRG.::: _ ! GFC.GLf:Y,COLORADO SO4 .. .. . _ _ �._.... r PµONE 130313`64000. EXT.425e Int P _ .1 v I. .l r Mr ._L. 'ly ..:1S.nTG.. +L.:..:'I :2 ., n.,. A.,:_ . (.V ., .:V C.r•rrrc.Y .J:::aGi-. INv CjilpA;,,,y ? r'v n .z.ht.:tiD 040 a ,2...r.--i; :7Lvt: SO :TL .1 . i.=.t 1 7'?O ._.'v._Lnl...: ..a ,.J bLl7 L.,.. OJ....C: . / 1C The appraised value of property is based on the appropriareconsideration of the approaches to value required bylaw. The Assessor has determined that your property should be included in the following category(ies): Residential property is valued by considering the cost and market approaches. --Agricultural land value is determined solely by the earning or production capacity of the land,capitalized at a rate set by law. _Producing mines are assessed at 25%of the gross proceeds or 100%of the net proceeds,whichever is greater. Oil and gas leaseholds and lands are assessed at 87.5% of the gross value of the oil and/or gas sold or transported from the premises on primary production;secondary production is valued at 75%. All other property,including vacant land,is valued by considering the cost,market,and income approaches. If your concern is the amount of your property tax, local taxing authorities (county, city,fire protection, and other special districts) hold budget hearings in the fall. Please refer to your tax bill or ask your Assessor for a listing of these districts,and plan to attend these budget hearings. The Assessor has carefully studied all available information, giving particular attention to the specifics included on your protest and has deter- mined the valuation(s)assigned to your property.The reasons for this determination of value are: . Q cam%GL HA:, 3LLN ..,.uE TO ThE AGT,iAL VALJAT. N uE: THI;, PriOPL.:TY• ll..%_L; A:3O LA;: I::_i.;U1.^,ES US Tu 5'=7,iD TEL :; NOT:CS O: Jc .dZ...L P.:r 1LL . ,:611 CAT14S ON wnlCN WE LU hO7 ADJUST THE W:LUL• . .< ' PETITIONER'S ASSCSS0R'S VALUATION PROPERTY CLASSIFICATION ESTIMATE ACTUAL VALUE ' ACTUAL VALVE OF VALUE PRIOR TO REVIEW AFTER REVIEW 1 i I LF.>.b i Fi5i 5OO i r 5OG t yy I 1:11; .I l JJ13✓•7V 3C.1s 374 I 1 i i TOTALS S S 4:7, 37‘ S 437, 376 If you clisagree with the Assessor's decision,you have the right to appeal to the County Board of Equalization for further consideration, 39-3-1C8(1)(a),C.R.S. Please see the back of this form for detailed information on filing your appeal. By: RICHARD W. KEIRNES A _ r � 4..+^ WELD COUNTY ASSESSOR DATE .5 UPT AO .o,M PS-;07 27/00 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON REVERSE SIDE • •r 'ETITION TO THE STATE SOARD OF ASSESSMENT APPEALS Date: August 28 , 1990 TO THE HONORABLE BOARD OF ASSESSMENT APPEALS: Your Petitioner, Rogers Automotive. Inc. (name of property owner) 707 12th St. — Greeley, CO 80631 (Street address, City, State, 'Lip Code of subject property) hereby appeals the decision of tho (check one) X County Board of Equalization County Board of Commissioners _Property Tax. Administrator for property located in the County of Weald that was dated August 17. 1990, concerning (check one) X Valuation _Refund _Exemption _Abatement for the year(s) 1990. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: (Legal description - if multiple properties are involved in the one decision being appealed, a listing of the county schedule or parcel numbers with the corresponding properties - must be submitted as an attachment to the petition) PARCEL #09610820201.3/PIN R 3236686 PROPERTY CLASSIFICATION: This property is classified as: (Please check. one) X Commercial Residential Vacant land _Industrial Agricultural Natural Resources _Producing Mines _Oil and Gam State Assessed Exempt ATTACHMENTS TO THIS PETITION FORM: (Please check off the attachments you will be using) X The decision (County Board Of Equalization, County board 04 Commissioner,, or Property Tax Administrator) that is being appealed. This attachment MUST be with the petition in order for it to be accepted for docketing. X The Assessor 's Notice of Denial . • _ X The facts and law (the issue(s) involved) , on which this appeal is based. C.R.S 39-8-108 (1) X List of witnesses and exhibits to be used at the hearing. (Per BAA Rule 11 To be determined) X Exhibits, if any, to be used at the hearing. (Per BAA Rule 11 To be determined) ESTIMATED TIME FOR PETITIONER TO PRESENT THE APPEAL: 6Q minutes or 1 hours REPRESENTATION: (Please check appropriate responses) Petitioner will be present at the hearing, or Petitioner requests that the Board rule on the documentation submitted. Petitioner will be represented by a Colorado Attorney X ye , _no. 41742 page 1 of 2 • Make five ( ) copies of this petition form with all attachments and exhibits. The original (with original sisnature) plus three entire copies (a total of four (4) ) are to be filed with the Board of Assessment Appeals; ono entire copy to be filed with the Respondent (County Board of Equalization, County Commissioners or Property Tax Administrator) as shown in Certificate of Service; and one entire copy to be kept for Petitioner 's records. CERTIFICATE CF F.ERVTC6 I certify to the Board of Assessment Appeals that 1 have mailed (or hand delivered) one copy of this petition form, together- with all attachments and exhibits, to the Weld ( indicate one) County Board of Equalization, County Board of Commissioners, or Property Tax Administrator in Greeley Colorado, on August 29, 1990. � 1 (—MN\ �. C_-_c_ /Net r JuIlie Greni (/ Petitioner's sisnature Attorney for Pet tioner Res. No. 15025 640 E. Eisenhower Blvd. Petitioner's mailing address Suite A Loveland, Colorado 80537 (303) 667-8963 Petitioner 's Telephone No. 1- 1742 page 2 of 2 it/7'1;' RESOLUTION RE: THE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, 1990, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PETITION OF: ROGERS AUTOMOTIVE INC j ' 707 12 ST . i GREELEY, CO 80631 i DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: PIN- , ,236''~ 6tir CEL: 096108202013 - GR 5259 E75' L7 & ALL L8 B707 12 STS WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, f Colorado, organized as a Board of Equalization for the purpose r, .: of adjusting, equalizing, raising or lowering the assessment and valuation of real and per.,onal property within this County, fixed and made by the County Assessor for the year 1990, and 4 WHEREAS, said petition has been heard before the County Assessor and due notice of adjustment thereon has been given 0 to the taxpayer(s) , and WHEREAS, the taxpayer(s) presented a petition of appeal to tho County Assessor's valuation for the year 1990, claiming grounds for relief thereunder stating the property described in such petition was assessed` too high; as more specifically F . stated -in said petition, and • Ii; WHEREAS, said ' petitioner being' 'represented by North' . N American Property Consultants who submitted a letter regarding said petition, and WHEREAS, the Board has made its findings on the evidence, - testimony and remonstrances and is now fully informed. i' P L NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County 0. J. Commissioners of -Weld County, acting as the Board of Equalization, that the evidence presented at the hearing - clearly. supported the . value placed upon -the Petitioner's- i' property by the Weld County Assessor: Such evidence indicated the value was reasonable, .equitable,: and derived according to the methodologies, percentages, figures and formulas dictated to the Weld County Assessor by law. :As such, this Board finds that the,Petitioner failed to meet its burden of proving that the Assessor's valuation was incorrect. The assessment and valuation oaf the Weld County`AsSe sor zhali be; and hereby is, .e firmed BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a denial . of a petition, in J. whole or in part, by the Board of Equalization may be appealed 4.cn by selecting rm or the following three options: `; �. c Page RE: BOE - ROGERS AUTOMOTIVE INC 1. Board of Assessment JAAaeal�: You have the right to appeal the County Board of Equalization's (CBOE's) decision to the Board of Assessment Appeals (BAA) . Such hearing is the final hearing at which testimony, exhibits or any other • evidence may be introduced. If the decision of the BAA is Pura-her appealed to the Court of Appeals, only the record created at the BAA hearing shall be the basis for the Court's decision. No new evidence can be introduced at the Court of Appeals. (39-8-108(1) , CRS) Appeals to the BAA must be made on forms furnished by the BAA, and should be mailed or delivered within thirty (30) days of denial by the CBOE to: Board of Assessment Appeals 1313 Sherman Street, Room 523 Denver, CO 80203 Phone: 866-5880 OR 2. plftrict Court: You have the right to appeal the CBOE's decision to the District Court of the county wherein your property in located. New testimony, exhibits or any other evidence may be introduced at the District Court hearing. For filing requirements please contact your attorney, . or the Clerk of the District Court. Further appeal ' of the, District•.Court's decision is made to the Court of Appeals for a review of the record. (39-8-108(1), CRS) OR 3. Binding Arbitration: You have the right to submit your case to arbitration. If you choose this option the arbitrator's decision is gmlal and your right to appeal your _ current valuation ends. (39-8-108.5, CRS) - in order to pursue arbitration, you must notify the OBOE of your intent. You and the CBOE " select an arbitrator from the official list of qualified people. If you cannot agree on an arbitrator, the District Court of the county in which the property is located ' will make, the selection. Arl X}a'tipr. HgIringjioceuure Arbitration' hearings are held within sixty days from the date the arbitrator is selected. Both you and the`CBOE are entitled to participate. The hearings are informal. The arbitrator has the authority: Page 3 RE: BOE - ROGERS AUTOMOTIVE INC to issue subpoenas for witnesses, books, records, documents and other evidence. He also has the power to administer oaths, and all questions of law and fact shall be determined by him. The arbitration hearing may be confidential and closed to the public, upon mutual agreement. The arbitrator's written decision must be delivered to both parties personally or by registered mail within ten (10) days of the hearing. Such decision is final and not subject to review. fie ; and Expense - The arbitrator's fees and expenses are agreed upon by you and the CBOE. In the case of residential real property, such fees and expenses cannot exceed $150.00 per case. The arbitrator's fees and expenses, not including counsel fees, are to be paid as provided in the decision. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 27th day of J y, Are. 0. ATTEST: y/ jet, BOARD F COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD Y, CO DO Weld County Clerk to the Board ene R. Brantner, Chairman Yt eputy Clerk to the Board r.. �4 Ge rge Kennedy, Pro-Tem /!/ i �, BP�0 AS TO FORM- 7 C ��S 7 ,7.....e.... r�L . -/ Constance L. Harbert �-� - fiti'-2.f• �yrCounty.Attorney C. w. Kirby (EXCUSED) Gordon E. Lacy • • .T, OS _ \ VOT1G:: ' CF DENIAL 1 GREELEY,COLORADO S0651 q 111 ` PHONE t303)25.64000. EXT.4:56 1 117•ulnjr ��...-.j G:4, 5250 ETV L7 G ALL L3 JLX 32:707 12 ST': .�Lai.1,-, ;``��„ COLORADO 707 12 ST GREELEY OWNER ROGERS AUTOMOTIVE INC N.A.P.C. PARCCL 09610ts20201Z PIN R 32366x6 640 C EISENHOwER, STE. A YEAR 1990 LOVELAND CO 80537 LOG 00822 D6/12/1990 `Mc, appraised value of property is based on the appropriate consideration of the approaches to value required by law.The Assessor has determined that your property should be included in the following oategoryfies): Residential property is valued by considering the cost and market approaches. —Agricultural land value is determined solely by the earning or production capacity of the land,capitalized at a rate set by law. _Producing mines are assessed at 2577;of the gross proceeds or 100%of the net proceeds,whichever is greater, --OH and cas leaseholds and lands are assessed at £7.5% of the gross value of the oil and/or gas sold or transportec from the premises on primary production;secondary production is valued at 75%. __All other property,including vacant land, is valued by considering the cost,market,and income approaches. If your concern is the amount of your property tax, local taxing authorities (County, city, fire protection, and other special district:) hold budget hearings in the fall. Please refer to your tax bill or ask your Assessor for a listing of these districts,and plan to attend these budget hearings. The Assessor has carefully studied all available information, giving ��particular attention to the specifics included on your protest and has deter. . mined the Chi-iNC.t lk:a .)thia property.i1/2DcTO r'TaHE ALTUAitorVALUATA. 771UeLW THIS PROPERTY.the Ctt..hGE ngne to you r1i Jc , COLORADO LAW REQUIRES US TO SEND THIS NOTICE OF DENIAL FOR ALL PROPERTIES OR WHICH WE. DO NOT ADJUST THE VALUE. PETITIONER'S ASSESSOR'S VALUATION PROPERTY CLASSIFICATION ESTIMATE ACTUAL VALUE ACTUAL VALUE ' OF VALUE PRIOR TO REVIEW I AFTER REVIEW LAND � 58; 108 5ajlets IMPS 236,350 236)3S0 RECEIVED Jai 2,7:21 TOTALS S S ty4� S 3 `S _ .t4�DSb_i li you di;egree with the Assessor's decision,you have the right to appeal to the County Eoard of Equalization for further consideration, •*2•103(11(0.),C.R.S. Please see the back of this form for detailed information on filing your appeal. • Ey RICHARD W. .l'EIR_NES o6/2z/90 \VELD COUNTY ASSESSOR RECEIVtD'O(fN Ar 49 12 DPT.An IC REVERSE re•m P5.707 C7/120 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON REVERSE SIDE (�Ck 1 • PETITION TC T:-iE STATE BOARD OF ASSESSMENT APPS LS Date: August 23 , 1990 TO THE HONORABLE BOARD OF ASSESSMENT APPEALS: Your Petitioner, Mike/Rhoda Rogers/Rogers Automotive, Inc. (name of property owner) 233_•5 19th Ave. — Greeley, CO 80631 (Street address, City, State, Zip Code of subject property) hereby appeals the decision of the (check one) X County Board of Equalization _County Board of Commissioners _Property Tae: Administrator for property located in the County of Weld that was dated August 17, 1990, concerning (check one) X Valuation Refund _E:;emption _Abatement for the year (s) 1990. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: (Legal description - if multiple properties are involved in the one decision being appealed, a listing of the county schedule or parcel numbers with the corresponding properties - must be submitted as an attachment to the petition) PARCEL #096118320004/PIN R 3637486 PROPERTY CLASSIFICATION: This property is classified as: (Please check: one) _Commercial X Residential Vacant land _Industrial Agricultural Natural Resources _Producing Mines _Oil and Gas State Assessed Exempt ATTACHMENTS TO THIS PETITION FORM: (Please check off the attachments you will be using) X Tho decision (County Board of Equalization, County Board of Commissioner=_., or Property Tax Administrator) that IS being appealed. This attachment MUST be with the petition in order for it to be accepted for docketing. X The Assessor 's Notice of Denial. X The facts and law (the issue (s) involved) , on which this appeal is based. C.R.S 39-8-108 (1) X List of witnesses and exhibits to be used at the hearing. (Per BAA Rule 11 To be determined) X Exhibits, if any, to be used at the hearing. (Per BAA Rule 11 To be determined) ESTIMATED TIME FOR PETITIONER TO PRESENT THE APPEAL: 60 minutes or 1 hours REPRESENTATION: (Pleases check appropriate responses) Petitioner will be present at the hearing, or Petitioner regue is that the Board rule on the documentation submitted. Petitioner will be represented by a Colorado Attorney X ve s, �no. / Y j 7Y! page 1 of 2 ilifi e five (C) copies of this petition form with all _\.tt_,_nmen+,s and exhibits. The original (with original signature) plus three entire copies (a total of four (S) ) are to be filed ._with the Board o5 Assessment Appeals; one entire copy to be filed with the Respondent (County Board of Equalization, County Commissioners or Property Tax Administrator) as shown in Certificate of Service; and one entire copy to bp kept for petitioner's records. OERTIF?CATE OF SFRVICE. I certify to the Board of Assessment Appeals that I have mailed (or hand delivered) one copy of this petition form, together with ail attachments and exhibits, to the Weld ( indicate one) County Beard of Equalization, County Board of Commissioners, or Property Tax Administrator in Greeley Colorado, on August 29, :990. r -� • i. C_ Julie Greni V Petitioner's signature Attorney for petitioner Reg. No. 15025 640 E. Eisenhower Blvd. Petitioner 's mailing address Suite A Loveland, Colorado 805'7 (30Z) 667--8968 Petitioner's Telephone No. 4.1742 2 par, of RESOLUION RE: THE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, 1990, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PETITION OF: ROGERS MICHAEL W & RHODA FAITH 2335 19TH AVE GREELEY, CO 80631 DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: PIN:M3637,A Q PARCEL: 096118320004 - GR RO-4 L4 RITTER-OVERTURFtSUB-REPLAT WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, organized as a Board of Equalization for the purpose of adjusting, equalizing, raising or lowering the assessment and valuation of real and personal property within this County, fixed and made by the County Assessor for the year 1990, and WHEREAS, said petition has been heard before the County Assessor and due notice of adjustment thereon has been given to the taxpayer(s) , and . WHEREAS, the taxpayer(s) presented a petition of appeal ` to the County Assessor's valuation for the year 1990, claiming __ grounds for relief thereunder stating the property described in such petition was assessed too high, as more specifically stated in said petition, and WHEREAS, said petitioner being represented by North American Property Consultants who submitted a letter regarding said petition, and WHEREAS, the Board has made its findings on the evidence, testimony and remonstrances and is now fully informed. NOW; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, acting as the Board -of Equalization, that the evidence presented at the hearing clearly supported the value placed upon the Petitioner's property by the Weld County Assessor. Such evidence indicated the value was reasonable, equitable, and derived according ,to " the methodologies, percentages, figures and foraulas, dictated to the. Weld County Assessor by law. As such, this Board finds that the Petitioner failed to meet its burden of proving that the Assessor' s valuation was incorrect. The assessment and valuation of the Weld County Assessor^hall be, and hereby is,; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a denial of a petition, - in whole or in part, by the Board of Equalization may be appealed by selecting one of the following three options: Aw A ECE'1\6r 1 ��° 2 °Sv • Page 2 RE: BOE - ROGERS MICHAEL W & RHODA FAITH 1. Board of Assessment AAAeals: You have the right to appeal the County Beard of Equalization's (CBOE's) decision to the Board of Assessment Appeals (BAA) . Such hearing is the final hearing at which testimony, exhibits or any other evidence may be introduced. If the decision of the BAA is further appealed tc the Court of Appeals, only the record created at the BAA hearing shall be the basis for the Court's decision. No new evidence can be introduced at the Court of Appeals. (39-8-108(1) , CRS) Appeals to the BAA must be made on forms furnished by the BAA, and should be mailed or delivered within thirty (30) days of denial by the CBOE to: Board of Assessment Appeals t 1313 Sherman Street, Room 523 Denver, CO 80203 Phone: 866-5880 OR 2. District Court: You have the right to appeal the CBOE's decision to the District Court of the `tounty, wherein your property is located. New testimony, exhibits or any. other evidence may be ..introduced at the District:• Court • hearing. For filing requirements please contact your attorney or the Clerk of the District„Sourt. • Further appeal of -the District Court's decision is made to the Court of Appeals for a review of the record. (39-8-108 (1) , CRS) OR 3. Binding' Arbitration: You have the right to submit your case to arbitration. _ _ If .you choose this option the - - arbitrator's decision is final and your right to appeal your , current valuation ends. (39-8-108.5, CRS) Zelectine the Arbitrator ' - In order to pursue arbitration, you must notify the CBOE of your intent. You and the OBOE select an arbitrator from the Official list of qualified people. If you cannot agree on' an arbitrator, the District Court of the county in which the property is located will make the selection. • Ark tration Fse ina Prgcetxre - Arbitration hearings arc held within sixty days from the date the arbitrator is .elected.` Both you and the CBOE arc entitled to participate., Tan hearings are informal. The arbitrator has the authority \�." Page 3 RE: BOE - ROGERS MICHAEL W & RHODA FAITH to issue subpoenas for witnesses, books, records, documents and other evidence. He also has the power to administer oaths, and all questions of law and fact shall be determined by him. The arbitration hearing may be confidential and closed to the public, upon mutual agreement. The arbitrator's written decision must be delivered to both parties personally or by registered mail within ten (10) days of the hearing. Such decision is final and not subject to review. Fees and Expenses - The arbitrator's fees and expenses are agreed upon by you and the CBOE. In the case of residential real property, such fees and expenses cannot exceed $150.00 per case. The arbitrator's fees and expenses, not including counsel fees, are to be paid as provided in the decision. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 27th day.. of Jtn7y, A.D .' 4e4 ATTEST: 241/ a a BO F COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ' WEL LINTY, CO DO Weld County Clerk t the Board • Gene R.Brantner, Chairman eputy Clerk to\the Board � �� K �ti..� ,t eyge ennedy, Pro-Tem d AS TO FORM: /^ i-• e , ��15,-/ Constance L. Har e 4fJ ounty Attorney - C. W. Kirby / (EXCUSED) Gordon E. Lacy - • q \1 913 10th STREET GREELEY,COLORADO 50631 NOTICa CF DCNIAL V� �y PEONE(30?;356-1000. EXT.4:`_ n(1,72 n I,`' �Itf�I:d y,"-� GR fs:C L4 air:ER—OVERTURF SU3 REPLAT COLD tADO Ohr.fiR ROGL1RS MICHAEL w E. RHODA FAITH N.A.P.C. PARCEL 096118320004 PIN R 3637446 640 E. LIBZNNOL4:Re 57E. A YEAR 1990 LOVLLAND CO 00537 LOG 00624 OG/12/1990 The appraised value of property is based on the appropriate consideration of the approaches to value required by law,The Assessor has determined that your property should be included in the following category(les): -Residential property is valued by considering the cost and market approaches. - Agricultural land value is determined solely by the earning or production capacity of the land,capitalized at a rate set by law. -Producing mines are assessed at 25%of the gross proceeds or 100%of the net proceeds,whichever is greater. Oil znd gas leaseholds and lands are assessed at 87.5% of the gross value of the oil and/or gas sold or transported from the premises on primary production:secondary production is valued at 75%. -Ali other property,including vacant land,is valued by considering the cost,market,and income approaches. If your concern is the amount of your property tax, local taxing authorities (county, city, fire protection, and other special districts) hold budget hearings in the fall. Please refer to your tax bill or ask your Assessor for a listing of these districts,and plan to attend these budget hearings. The AtseSsor has carefully studied all available information, giving particular attention to the specifics included on your protest and has deter- mined the valu tion(s)assigned to your property.The reasons for this determination of value are: YOua PROPERTY HAS BEEN uNIFORHLY ASSESSED FOLLOWING COLORADO LAN ANO INSTRUCTIONS PULLISHED By THE STATE DIVISION OF PROPERTY TAXATION. COMPARISONS UITH OTHER :IMILAR pROPERTIE-S INDICATES YOUR VALUE IS PROPER AT THE 1988 VALUC LEVEL REquIRED BY LAY. PETITIONER'S I . ASSESSOR'S VALUATION 1 PROPERTY CLASSIFICATION ESTIMATE ACTUAL VALUE ACTUAL VALVE OF VALVE PRIOR TO REVIEW + AFTER REVIEW I I _ LAND 35,000 35,000 i IMPS 1122341 1124341 I II-- � ^ TOTALS S S 147x341 5 1472341 If you di:cgr=.e with the Assessor's decision,you have the right to appeal to the County Board of Equalization for further consideration, 3^-t-100(1)(x),C.F.S. Please sec the baek of this form for detailed information on filing your appeal. y,: RICRARD W. KEIR\ES 0.c/zap/aa WELD COUNTY ASSESSOR DATE 26(t/ I c c r rr r (. Form AW.^0797/00 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON REVERSRaMEIVET JUN 9 5 Wert • • TITION TO THE STATE BOARD OF ASSESSMENT APPEALS Date: August 23 • 1990 TO THE HONORABLE BOARD OF ASSESSMENT APPEALS: Your Petitioner, Goldmax Company. (name of property owner) 1716 1st Ave. - , CO (Street address, City, State, Zip Code of subject property) hereby appeals the decision of the (check one) X County Board of Equalization _County Board of Commissioners _property Tax Administrator for property located in the County of Weld that was dated August 17, 1990, concerning (check one) X Valuation RefundExemption _Abatement for the year (s) 1990. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: (Legal description - if multiple • properties are involved in the one decision being appealed, a listing of the county schedule or parcel numbers with the corresponding properties - must be submitted as an attachment to the petition) PARCEL 8096109300006/PIN R 3333086 PROPERTY CLASSIFICATION: This property is classified as: (please check: one) X Commercial Residential TVacant land _Industrial Agricultural _Natural Resources _Producing Mines Oil and Gas _State Assessed _Exempt ATTACHMENTS TO THIS PETITION FORM: (Please check off the attachments you will be using) X The decision (County Board of Equalization, County Board of Commissioners, or property Tax Administrator) that is being appealed. This attachment MUST be with tha petition in order for it to be accepted for docketing. X The Assessor 's Notice of Denial . X The facts and law (the issue(s) involved) , on which this appeal is based. C.R.S 39-8-108 (1) X List of witnesses and exhibits to be used at the hearing. (Per BAA Rule 11 To be determined) X Exhibits, if any, to be used at the hearing. (Per BAA Rule 11 To be determined) ESTIMATED TIME FOR PETITIONER TO PRESENT THE APPEAL: 60 minutes or 1 hours REPRESENTATION: (Please check appropriate responses) Petitioner will be present at the hearing, or Petitioner reyue,ts that the Board rule on the documentation submitted. Petitioner will be represented by a Colorado Attorney _K__yes, _no. ("2397 page 1 of 2 • "ake -rive. (_) copies of this petition form with all _:tt-..chments and i xhibit•_. The original (with original signatures plus; throe entire copies (a total o+ four (4•) ) are to be riled with the Board of Assessment Appeals; one entire copy to be filed with the Respondent (County Board of Equalization, County Commissioners or Property Tax Administrator) as shown in Certificate of Service; and one entire copy to be kept for Petit'ioner 's records. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify to the Board of Assessment Appeals that I have mailed (or hand delivered) one copy of this petition form, together with all attachments and exhibits, to the Weld ( indicates one) County Board of Equalization, County Board of Commissioners, or Property Tax Administrator in Greeley Colorado, on August 29, 1990. • Julia Greni I Petitioner 's signature Attorney for Petitioner Reg. No. 15025 640 E. Eisenhower Blvd. Petitioner's mailing address Suite A Loveland, Colorado 80537 (7307:11) 667-8962 Petitioner 's Telephone No. #2397 page 2 of 2 ,ra317 RESOLUTION RE: THE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, 1990, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PETITION OF: GOLDMAX CON.PANY THE 3091 S FILLMORE WAY DENVER, CO 80210 DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: PIN T-- cZ3Z. .O 6:- 0006 — 12314 PT N461.5' LS NW4SW4 �"9 5365BEG SOD26 E 2461 0 • 503FR0.1 NW COR L5 NW4SW4 THENCE N89D44 'E 333.25' SOD23 'E 215' S89D44 'W 178.05' NOD26'W 65 ' S89D44 'W 155' NOD26'W 150' TO BEG AKA LOT A REC EXEMP RE-423 EXC PORTION FOR R/W OF 1ST AV WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, organized as a Board of Equalization for the purpose of adjusting, equalizing, raising or lowering the assessment and valuation of real and personal property within this County, fixed and made by the County Assessor for the year 1990, and d petition has beenAssessorE nd due notice of adjustment thereoneard before has beenCounty to the taxpayer(s) , and . WHEREAS, the taxpayer(s) presented a petition of appeal to the -County Assessor's valuation for the year 1990, claiming grounds for relief thereunder stating the property described' in such petition was assessed too high, as more specifically stated in said petition, and WHEREAS, said petitioner being represented by North • American Property Consultants who submitted a letter regarding said petition, and - WHEREAS, the Board has made its findings on the evidence, testimony and remonstrances and is now fully informed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE . IT .RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, acting as the Board of - Equalization,, that the - evidence presented at the hearing clearly, supported the value' placed upon the' Petitioner's, property,by the Weld County.Assessor. Such; evidence indicated the value.was, reasonable, equitable, ;and derived according to the methodologies, percentages, figures and formulas dictated ` to the Weld County Assessor by law. As such, this, Board finds that the Petitioner failed to meet its burden of proving that tha Assessor's valuation was incorrect. The, assessment and valuation of the Weld County F sessor'shall be, and hereby is, affirmed. ' n r� v �F.CC��'cD '� '`' ` Page 2 RE: BOE - GOLDMAN COMPANY THE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a denial of a petition, in whole or in part, by the Board of Equalization may be appealed by selecting one of the following three options: i' 1. Board Of Assessment ADoeals: You have the right to appeal the County Board of Equalization's (CBOE's) decision to the Board of Assessment Appeals (BAA) . Such hearing is the final hearing at which testimony, exhibits or any other evidence may be introduced. If the decision of the BAA is further appealed to the Court of Appeals, only the record created at the BAA hearing shall be the basis for the Court's decision. No new evidence can be introduced at the Court of Appeals. (39-8-108 (1) , CRS) Appeals to the BAA must be made on forms furnished by the BAA, and should be mailed or delivered within thirty (30) days of denial by the CBOE to: Board of Assessment Appeals 1313 Sherman Street, Room 523 Denver, CO 80203 Phone: 866-5880 OR 2. District Court: You have the right to appeal the CBOE's decision to the District Courtof the county wherein h your property is .located. New testimony, , exhibits or,, any other evidence may be introduced at the District. -Court i hearing. For filing requirements please contact your attorney or the Clerk of the District Court. Further appeal of the District Court's decision is made to the Court of Appeals for a review of the record. (39-8-108 (1) , CRS) OR 3. ceding Arbitration: You have the right to submit your case to arbitration. If you choose this option the arbitrator's decision is final and your right to appeal your current valuation ends. (39-8-108.5, CRS) • SeleCtinq the Arbitrator In order to pursue e arbitration, you'must notify the CBOE of yourintent. You' and ' the CBOE select an arbitrator from the official list ' of qualified people. , If you cannot agree on an arbitrator,:;.the_. District Court of the county in which the property is located " will make the selection. presitrptten Hearing Procedure Arbitration hearings are held within sixty days from the date the arbitrator 'is selected. Both you and the CBOE are entitledto partia p,. , n, The. hearings are informal. The arbitrator has the.., 1; T�iF0i �y Page 3 RE: BOE - GOLDMAX COMPANY THE to issue subpoenas for witnesses, books, records, documents and other evidence. He also has the power to administer oaths, and all questions of law and fact shall be determined by him. The arbitration hearing may be confidential and closed to the public, upon mutual agreement. The arbitrator's written decision must be delivered to both parties personally or by registered mail within ten (10) days of the hearing. Such decision is Sinai and not subject to review. Fees_stnd Expenses - The arbitrator's fees and expenses are agreed upon by you and the CBOE. In the ease of residential real property, such fees and expenses cannot exceed $150.00 per case. The arbitrator's fees and expenses, not including counsel fees, are to be paid as provided in the decision. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 27th day of GuCtATTEST:Tyi mll BOARD OF COUNTY coraccsnoNtas WEL UNT1c COLA Weld County Clerk to the Board M " �Ar en R. rant c , Chairman beputy Clerk t the Board G�rge Kennedy, Pro-Tem SRO D AS TO FOi �� 1i,_/ o stance L. Har�e�c-/ r^ • ; ounty Attornty C. W. . Kirby/ (EXCUSED) . Gordon E. Lacy -• •Y� 1\ C 2 � � 7,,. n ci { 915 10th STREET / � NOTICE 43F •DEN AL OCJ_l GCLELCY,COLORADO°G6 l JJJ 1 PHONE(301313:64000 E\T +:=5 � n �,�7 1 a yn7 E,rp - 12714 P7 N4E1.51 LS NW43:i4 9 5 65 ::(0L2612 ic `C i 246.501 F;1Cy 5(.a CCa L5 N.•:45;44 Trt ZNC2 :1.19044' O 323.251323.251 .ly^yr3l � 2.5 Z69344' 1.4Z69344' 1173.05.173.05. iJ0.. 61 COLORADO 0.1 or - I / � i 1 6.. S..9'.•4Y 11 155 J::D26 IJ 150 TC ct; .:,CA _ A REC L.ErJP RE-423 EXC PCRT1CA FOR R/:. CP .0T A'J 1716 1 AV 011NER GCLJt1.“ COMPANY THE G�LDMAX COMPANY THE PARCSL 096109300006 ' PIN -, R 3333066 3091 S FILLMORE WAY YEAR 1990 DENVER CO 80210 LOG 00332 06/12/1990 The appraised value of property is based on the appropriate consideration of the approaches to value required by law,The Assessor has determined that your property should be included in the following eategory(ies): - _Residential property is valued by considering the cost and market approaches. —Agricultural land value is determined solely by the earning or production capacity of the land,capitalized at a rate set by law. Producing mines are assessed at 25%of the gross proceeds or 100%of the net proceeds,whichever is greater. —Oil and gas leaseholds and lands are assessed at 87.5% of the gross value of the oil and/or gas sold or transported from the premises on primary production;secondary production is valued at 75%. All other property,including vacant land,is valued by considering the cost,market,and income approaches. If your concern is the amount of your property tax, local taxing authorities (county,city,fire protection, and other special districts) hold budget hearings in tho fall.Please refer to your tax bill or ask your Assessor fora listing of these districts,and plan to attend these budget hearings. The Assessor I has carefully studied all available information, giving particular attention to the specifics included on your protest and has deter- mined NovGNA"Gsta:„gncd�aoLycYlpiiajty'Th r�`ticsao�>jhu5�lnLterlrr.:g��oi�:�la�ale THIS PROPERTY. COLORADO LAW REQUIRES US TO SEND THIS NOTICE OF DENIAL FOR ALL PROPERTIES ON NHICH JJE DO NOT ADJUST THE VALUE. RECciVE0 Jut:, G 2 1,S' w PETITIONER'S ASSESSOR'S VALUATION i PROPERTY CLASSIFICATION ESTIMATE ACTUAL VALUE ACTUAL VALUE OF VALUE pRIOR TO REVIEW AFTER REVIEW. LAND 41, 063 41 ,663 MPs 150,30O 150,800 I t TOTALS $ $ - 19G,4.64 $ 15(1,40.4 If you disagree with the Assessor's decision,you have the right to appeal to the County Board of Equalization for further consideration, 3:'-3•',Cu(1)(a),C.R.S. Please see the back of this form for detailed information on filing your appeal. e5(: RICHARD W. I;EIRNES 06/25/90 WELD COUNTY ASSESSOR ' DATE 12 Annirlow4i- rorn7Mp'rtnNInAloc.v;.eerrrmc ! I�� ETITICN TO THE STATE BOARD OF ASSESSMENT APPEALS Date: August ^S 1990 TO THE HONORABLE SOARD OF ASSESSMENT AP'P'EALS: Your Petitioner, Taco Caliente/dba Taco Bell/Wall Trustees (name of property owner) 2401 10th St. - Greeley, CO (Street address, City, State, Zip Code of subject property) hereby appeals the decision of the (check one) X County Board of Equalization _County Board of Commissioners _Property Tax Administrator for property located in the County of Weld that was dated August 17, 1990, concerning (thee:: one) X Valuation _Refund Exemption _Abatement for the year (s) 1990. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: (Legal description - if multiple properties are involved in the one decision being appealed, a listing of the county schedule or parcel numbers with the corresponding properties - must be submitted as an attachment to the petition) PARCEL N09590142400S/RIN R 1798286 PROPERTY CLASSIFICATION: This property is classified as: (Please check: one) X Commercial _Residential Vacant land Industrial _Agricultural _Natural Resources _Producing Mines _Oil and Gas _State Assessed _Exempt ATTACHMENTS TO THIS PETITION FORM: (Please check off the attachments you will be using) X The decision (County Board of Equalization, County Board of Commissioners, or Property Tax Administrator) that is being appealed. This attachment MUST be with the petition in order for it to be accepted for docketing. X The Assessor 's Notice of Denial. X The facts and law (the issue(s) involved) , on which this appeal is based. C.R.S 39-8-108 (1) X List of witnesses and exhibits to be used at the hcariny. (Per BAA Rule 11 To be determined) X Exhibits, if any, to be used at the hearing. (Per BAA Rule 11 To be determined) ESTIMATED TIME FOR PETITIONER TO PRESENT THE APPEAL: • 60 minutes or 1 hours REPRESENTATION: (Please check appropriate responses) Petitioner will be present at the hearing, or _Petitioner requests that the Board rule on the documentation submitted. Petitioner will be represented by a Colorado Attorney X fin„ no. 42514 page 1 of `lake five (C) copies cf this petition form with all attachments and exhibits. The original (with original signature) plus tree ontire Copies (a total of `our (4) ) ire to be filed with the Board of Assessment Appeals; one ontire copy to ba filed with the Respondent (County Board of Equalization, County Commissioner= or Property Tax Administrator) as shown in Certificate of Service; and one entire copy to be kept for Petitioner 's records. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify to the Board of Assessment Appeals that I have mailed (or hand delivered) one copy of this petition form, together with all attachments and exhibits to the Weld ( indicate one) County Board o4 Equalization, County Board of Commissioners, or property Tax Administrator in Greeley Colorado, on August 29, 1990. • • / Ju; ic/Greni (/ Petitioner 's signature Attorney for Petiitioner Reg. No. 15025 640 E. Eisenhower 81vd. Petitioner 's mailing address i Suite A Loveland, Colorado 80577 (._0. ) 667-8968 Petitioner 's Telephone No. 42514 p7Oe 2 of . RESOLUTION RE: THE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, 1990, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PETITION OF: WALL JOSEPH A & MARILYN K TRUSTEES t GEORGE MC ELROY & ASSOC-TACO BELL 221 E 29TH ST SUITE #214 LOVELAND, CO 80537 DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: PIN 51.'7 28g?. "ARCEL: 095901424005 - GR 5943 L28 81.10.6 HOUSTON HleSt2-401 10TH-ST% WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, organized as a Board of Equalization for the purpose of adjusting, equalizing, raising or lowering the assessment and valuation of real and personal property within .this County, fixed and made by the County Assessor for the year 1990, and WHEREAS, said petition has been heard before the County Assessor and due novice of adjustment thereon has been given to the taxpayer(s) , and. WHEREAS, the taxpayer(s) presented a petition of appeal to the County Assessor's valuation for the year 1990, claiming grounds-for relief thereunder stating the property described in such petition was assessed too high; as more specifically stated in said petition,..and : '; WHEREAS, said petitioner being represented by North American Property Consultants who submitted a letter regarding said petition, and WHEREAS, the Board has made its findings on the evidence, testimony and remonstrances and is now fully informed. NOW, THEREFORE, - 'BE IT- RESOLVED by the Board' of County Commissioners of Weld County, acting as the Board of Equalization, that the evidence presented at the hearing clearly supported the value placed upon the Petitioner's. { property by the weld County Assessor. Such evidence indicated the value was:reasonable, equitable, and derived according to the methodologies,• pereentages, figures and formulas dictated to the Weld County AssesSOr,by law. As such, this Board finds that'the"Petitioner failed to meet its burden of proving that the• Assessor's valuation was_,incorrect. The assessment and valuation of the Weld County,'.Assessor shall be, and hereby is, affirmed. �^c n yJ • ✓ i ' , „ t Page 2 RE: BOE - WALL JOSEPH A & MARILYN X TRUSTEES i • BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a denial of a petition, in whole or in part, by the Board of Equalization may be appealed by selecting gig of the following three options: 1. poard of Assessment Abbeals: You have the right to appeal the County Board of Equalization's (CBOE's) decision to the Board of Assessment Appeals (BAA) . Such hearing is the final hearing at which testimony, exhibits or any other evidence may be introduced. If the decision of the FAA is further appealed to the Court of Appeals, only the record created at the BAA hearing shall be the basis for the Court's decision. No new evidence can be introduced at the Court of Appeals. (39-8-108(1) , CRS) Appeals to the BAA must be made on forms furnished by the BAA, and should be mailed or delivered within thirty (30) days of denial by the OBOE to: Board of Assessment Appeals 1313 Sherman Street, Room 523 • Denver, CO •. 80203 Phone: 866-5880 i OR 2. District Court: You have ' the . right to appeal the CB0E's• decision to the District Court .oE .the county wherein your property is located. New testimony, exhibits or any other evidence may be lintroduced at. • the`' District Court hearing.' For filing requirements please'contact your attorney or the Clerk of the District Court. ` Further appeal of the District Court's decision is made to the Court of Appeals for a review of the record. (39-8-108 (1) , CRS) OR i { 3. B?nding Arbitration: You ha.: the right to submit your case to arbitration. If you ' choose this option the arbitrator's decision is final and your right to appeal your current valuation ends. (39-8-108.5,• CRS) ._ } , ,Selecting the Arbitrator - In order to pursue arbitration, you must notify the CBOE of your intent. You and F • the CBOE ;select an arbitrator, from the official list ,:of qualified. people; If you cannot agree on an arbitrator, .the District Court,pf ,the county_ in which the property is located will make the selection.. Atbk t ti on gearin4 Prpgse - Arbitration hearings are meld within sixty days from the date the arbitrator is t - selected. Both you and the OBOE ace entitled to participate_ The hearings are informal. The arbitrator has the authority., ac^ ; <!� 1 U i`,.,S F1\,�� fit,•. t Page 3 RE: BOE - WALL JOSEPH A & MARILYN IC TRUSTEES to issue subpoenas for witnesses, books, records, documents and other evidence. He also has the power to administer oaths, and all questions of law and fact shall be determined by him. ' The arbitration hearing may be confidential and closed to the public, upon mutual agreement. The arbitrator's written decision must be delivered to both parties personally or by registered mail within ten (10) days of the hearing. Such decision is final and not subject to review. lees and Expenses - The arbitrator's fees and expenses are agreed upon by you and the CBOE. In the case of residential real property, such fees and expenses cannot exceed $150.00 per case. The arbitrator's fees and expenses, not including counsel fees, are to be paid as provided in the decision. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by ..:he following vote on the 27ta . day of J y, A�.D� /19 0. ATTEST: ( /' /, /��,A BOAR) OF COUNTY COMNCSSIONERS TilOffifif /777 l WE OUNTY, C LORADO Weld County Clerk to the Board r Gene. R.' 3rantner, ,Chaxrman : Deputy Clerk the Board G1 ge Kennedy, Pro-Tem g - APFEOVED AS TO FORM: C `�� ,er ��, ✓ J Constance L. Harbert / ' - f%f ?l4. cli . ey! County Attorney C. w. Kirby / (EXCUSED) Gordon E. Lacy • 7 2 • -cs\ SO �1}U STREET L EY,COLORADO t5 sock ORADO NOTICE. OF DENIAL ( GRF.E ^.531 � F::ONE13 0 31 3564000. E\C.:3,t. t IrTf'9 sl ,' �.+� 59 -, 1,,r.4yl 02. GR .»43 Lid yL}:lb fiOU�TO:f HTS:C4C1 1O7}t STr. 7 (r'S 1. r /� 5 ,y� � c� C th.O7+3,L_DO OWNER ::ALL JOSEPH A G MARILYN K TRUSTEES N.A.P•C. PARCEL 09590142.4005 PIN R 1793366 64O E•E•ISENACWER, STE. A YEAR 199O LOVELAND CO OO537 LOG OO}133 O6/12/199O The appraised value of property is based on the appropriate consideration of the approaches to value required by law.The Assessor has determined that your property should be included in the following category(ies): Residential property is valued by considering the cost and market approaches. —Agricultural land value is determined solely by the earning or production capacity of the land,capitalized at a rate set by law. _Producing mines are assessed at 25`5 of the gross proceeds or 1OO%of the net proceeds,whichever is greater, _ Oil and gas leaseholds and lands are assessed at 87,5% of the gross value of the oil and/or gas sold or transported from the premises on primary production;secondary production is valued at 75%. All other property, including vacant land,is valued by considering the cost,market,and income approaches. If your concern is the amount of your property tax, focal taxing authorities (county, city, fire protection, and other special districts) hold budget hearings in the fail. Please refer to your tax bill or ask your Assessor for a listing of these districts,and plan to attend these budget hearings, The Assessor has carefully studied all available information, giving particular attention to the specifics included on your protest and has deter- mined the valuation(slassinned to y.0ur property.The masons for this determination_ovalue re: r NJ CHAN( L HAS JtcN MNJL TU THc ACTUAL VALUATION OF THIS PROPERTY. COLORADO LAW REQUIRES US TO SEND THIS NOTICE OF DENIAL FOR ALL PROPERTIES ON WHICH WE DO NOT ADJUST THE VALUE. • • PETITIONER'S ASSESSOR'S VALUATION PROPERTY CLASSIFICATION ESTIMATE ACTUAL VALUE ACTUAL VALUE Of VALUE PRIOR TO REVIEW AFTER REVIEW 1 - LAND 76, 690 76a698 IMPS 1311221 1J1s441 I I TOTALS S S 20/, 9.-9 5 zO/1J1`r L_ If you disagree with the Assessor's decision,you have the right to appeal to the County Board of Equalization for further consiceration, :Q.::-105(1)(a),C.R.S. Please see the back 61.this form for detailed information on filing your appeal. RJCH�D W. KEIRNEs Or✓/19/90 By. _ -- O��u �'�ELD COUN)Y ASSESSOR 1`,tT� 3uN 2 2 1`' � s.crt.n❑ ADMTIONAf_ INFORMATION ON R,EVFRSF SIr- ri-u` Date: Aupust28 1990 T C THE HONURr 2LE FJOARD CF A;SEES5 IEti i APPEALS: Your Petitioner, Taco _Caliente/dba Taco _Bell/Jim & Carole E'nt. (name of property owner) 2401 8th Ave. -- GreeleY, CO _ (Street address. City, State, Zip Code of subject property) hereby appeals the decision of the (check one) X County Board of Equalization County Board of Commissioners Property Tax Administrator fur property located in the County of Weld that was dated Auettst 17, 19?0, concerning (check one) X Valuation Refund Exemption Abatement for the year (s) 1990. DESCRIFTICN OF P'ROP'ERTY: (Legal description - if multiple properties are involved in the one decision being appealed, a listing of the county schedule or parcel numbers with the corresponding properties - must be submitted as an attachment to the petition) PARCEL. #096117303015/PIN R 3530886 PROPERTY CLASSIFICATION: This property is classified as: (Please check one) X_Commercial Residential Vacant land Industrial Agricultural Natural Resources Producing Mines Oil and Gas State Assessed Exempt ATTACHMENTS TO THIS PETITION FORM: (please check off the attachments you will be using) X The decision (County Board of Equalization, County Board of Commissioners, or Property Tax Adminiotrator) that io being appealed. This attachment MUST be with the petition in order for it to be accepted for docketing. X The Asseosor 's Notice of Denial. X The facts and law (the issue(s) involved) , on which this appeal is bused. C.R.S 39-8-108 (1) X List of witnesses and exhibits to be used at the hearing. (Per BAA Rule 11 To be determined) X Exhibits, if any, to be used at the hearing. (Per AAA Rule 11 To be determined) ESTIMATED TIME FOR PETITIONER TO PRESENT THE APPEAL: 60 minutes or , 1 hour REPRESENTATION: (Please Check .appropriate responses) Petitioner will be present at the hearing, or Petitioner requests that the Board rule on the documentation submitted. Petitioner will be represented by a Colorado Attorney X yC'r, no. 42.514 page 1 of 2 Make iiVe (5) copies of this petition form with all attachments and exhibits. The original (with original signature) plus three entire copies (a total of tour (4) ) are to be filed with the Eoard of Assessment Appeals; one entire copy to be filed with the Respondent (County Board of Equalization, County Commissioners or Property Tax Administrator) as shown in Certificate of Service; and one entire copy to be kept for Petitioner 's records. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I Certify to the Board of Assessment Appeals that I have mailed (or hand delivered) one copy of this petition form, together with all attachments and exhibits, to the Weld ( indicate one) County Board of Equalization, County Board of Commissioners, or Property Tax Administrator in Greeley Colorado, on August 29, 1990. �I / ' 1 � Julie+ Greni (J Petitioner 's signature Attdrney for Petitioner Reg. No. 15025 640 E. Eisenhower Blvd. Petitioner's mailing address Suite A Loveland, Colorado 605=7 (170=) 667-2968 P'etitioner's Telephone No. 42'314 page 2 of 2 CS/I EESOLUTI9U RE: THE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, 1990, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PETITION OF: JIM & CAROLE ENTERPRISES INC 221 E 29 ST LOVELAND, CO 80537 DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: PINfWanCtg,WpAR GR 1349 Ll & N2 L2 BLK10 1S PX4I1401C 17303015 8TH AVE% WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of weld County, • Colorado, organized as a Board of Equalization for the purpose of adjusting, equalizing, raising or lowering the assessment and valuation of real and personal property within this County, fixed and made by the County Assessor for the year 1990, and WHEREAS, said petition has been heard before the County Assessor and due notice of adjustment thereon has been given to the taxpayer(s) , and WHEREAS, the taxpayer(s) presented a petition of appeal to the County Assessor's valuation for the year 1990, claiming grounds for relief thereunder'stating' the property' described in such petition was assessed too high, as more specifically stated in said petition/ and' WHEREAS, said petitioner being represented by North American Property Consultants who submitted a letter regarding said petition, and WHEREAS, the Board has made its findings on the evidence, • testimony and remonstrances and is now fully informed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by :the Board of County Commissioners of weld County,' acting as the Board of Equalization, that the evidence presented at the hearing clearly supported the value placed upon the Petitioner's property by the weld County Assessor. Such evidence indicated the value was reasonable, equitable, and derived according'to` the methodologies, percentages, figures and formulas'� dietated to the Weld County Assessor by law. As such, this Board finds that the Petitioner failed to meet its burden of proving that the Assessor's valuation was incorrect. The assessment and valuation of the Weld County"A SeSber'shall be; and hereby is, 'fiirmed BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a denial of a petition, in whole o; in part, by the Board of Equalization may be appealed by selecting one of the following three options: , f\u, 2 IA Page 2 RE: EOE - JIM & CAROLE ENTERPRISES INC 1. Board of_Assessment Amaeals: You have the right to appeal the County Board of Equalization's (CBOE's) decision to the Board of Assessment Appeals (BAA) . Such hearing is the final hearing at which testimony, exhibits or any other evidence may be introduced. If the decision of the BAA is further appealed to the Court of Appeals, only the record created at the BAA hearing shall be the basis for the Court's decision. No new evidence can be introduced at the Court of Appeals. (39-8-108(1) , CRS) • • • Appeals to the BAA must be made on forms furnished by the BAA, and should be mailed or delivered within thirty (30) days of denial by the CBOE to: Board of Assessment Appeals 1313 Sherman Street, Room 523 • Denver, CO 80203 Phone: 866-5880 OR • 2. Distriect Count: You have the right to appeal the CBOE's decision to the District Court of the county wherein . your property is located. New testimony, exhibits or .any. other evidence may be introduced at the -District Court hearing: For filing requirements please contact your attorney` or the clerk of the District Court. Further appeal of .the District Court's decision is made to the Court of Appeals' for a review of the record. (39-8-108 (1) , CRS) • OR • 3. Binding Arbitration: You have the right to submit ; your case to arbitration. If you choose this option the -arbitrator's decision is final and your right to appeal your current valuation ends. (39-8-108.5, CRS) Selecting the Arbitrator - In order to pursue arbitration, you must notify the CBOE of your intent. ` You and the OBOE select an arbitrator from the official list . of qualified people. If you cannotagree on an arbitrator; the • District Court of the county in which the property is located will make the selection. Ark:k %+ i4n E:Ring Procedure Arbitration hearings are held within sixty flays from the date the arbitrator is selected. Both you and the OBOE are entitled to participate. The hearings are informal. The arbitrator has the authority iI I r Page 3 RE: BOE - JIM & CAROLE ENTERPRISES INC to issue subpoena: for witnesses, books, records, documents and other evidence. He also has the power to administer oaths, and all questions of law and fact shall be determined by him. The arbitration hearing may be confidential and closed to the public, upon mutual agreement. The arbitrator's written decision must be delivered to both parties personally or by registered mail within ten (10) days of the hearing. Such decision is final and not Subject to review. FFcLs and Expenses - The arbitrator's fees and expenses are agreed upon by you and the OBOE. In the case of residential real property, such fees and expenses cannot exceed $150.00 per case. The arbitrator's fees and expenses, not including counsel fees, are to be paid as provided in the decision. • • The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 27th day of J A.D. 19 O. ATTEST: Y BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 111 WEL LINTY, CO DO Weld County Clerk t the.Board _aye enc R. Bran er, CChairman ei Deputy Clerk to the Board Pie GGeeorge Kennedy, Pro-Tem / AP / AS TO FORM• / /� /�• -r l 1 -/ CCConstance L. Hart) rt '_,4County Attorney C. w. K rby / (EXCUSED) Gordon E. Lacy • • Roc^ v � 1Uu ^rL 9:S 10th STREET NCT/CE -43F DENIAL GRiiELET.COLOR-AD05063t PHONE 1303)3564000, LAT.4256 GR 1049 L1 ; :f2 L2 DLA10 1ST ARL Pn rCOLL EL:DO 0st° 2401 II AV GREELEY OWNcR JIM S CAROLS ENTERPRISES, Inc N.A.P.C. PARCEL 09511730301S PIN R 35::0886 640 EdEISENHOWER, STE. A YEAR 1990 LOVELAND CO 80537 LOG 00339 Oti/1Z/1990 The appraised value of prooerty is based on the approoriate consideration of the approaches to value required by law.The Assessor has determined that your property should be included in the following eategory(ies): Residential prooertV is valued by considering the cost and market approaches. Agricultural land value is determined solely by the earning or production capacity of the land,capitalized at a rate set by law. Producing mines are assessed at 25%of the gross proceeds or 100'o of the net proceeds,whichever is greater, Gil and gas leaseholds and lands are assessed at 87.5% of the gross value of the oil and/or gas sold or transported from the premises on primary production;secondary production is valued at 75%. All other property, including vacant land,is valued by considering the cost,market,and income approaches. If your concern is the amount of your property tax, local taxing authorities (county, city, fire protection, and other special districts) hold budget hearings in the fall. Please refer to your tax bill or ask your Assessor for a listing of these districts,and plan to attend these budget hearings, The Assessor has carefully studied all available information, giving particular attention to the specifics included on your protest and has deter• mined the voluationjsi assigned to your property. The reasons for th.is deterry+inat o of yalue ar : I1u CHAHUE HAS uE_W MA.1t TO Tilt. ACTUAL VALUATION OF THIS PROPERTY. COLORADO LAW REQUIRES US TO SEND THIS NOTICE OF DENIAL FOR ALL PROPERTIES ON FHICH WE DO NOT ADJUST THE VALUE. PETITIONER'S I ASSESSOR'S_VALUATION PROPERTY CLASSIFICATION ESTIMATE ACTUAL VALUE ACTUAL VALUE OF VALUE PRIOR TO REVIEW AFTER REVIEW i I I LAND S0J533 502 52.3 I • IMPS 150)763 153,733 I I TOTALS S e 0 S tOY�.i1t If you disagrea with the Assessor's decision,you have the right to appeal to the County Board of Equalization for further consideration, J Se•S-1C3(1)(c),C.R.S. Please see the back of this form for detailed infaration on filing your appear. By RICILAR ) W. hEIRNES .36/19/90 WELD COUNTY ASSESSOR DATE ;T ce.Mecr 707 C7/90 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON REVERSE .`1 i FjVcD JUN' -2 2 19°� '�`, (✓'_. � 1 .T 11��': THE STATE ��OARD VI' ASSESSMENT S J •w: I i APPEALS Date: August 22 1990 TO THE HONORABLE 80ARD OF ASSESSMENT AP'P'EALS: Your Petitioner, R _r_ Hansen (name of property owner) 51S W Main - Windsor, CO (Street address, City, State, Zip Code of subject property) hereby appeals the decision of the (check one) X County Board of Equalization County Soard of Commissioners _Property Tax Administrator for property located in the County of Weld that was dated August 17, 1990, concerning (check one) X Valuation _Refund _Exemption Abatement fer the vear (s) 199 }. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: (Legal description - if multiple properties are involved in the one decision being appealed, a listing of the county schedule or parcel numbers with the corresponding properties - must be submitted as an attachment to the petition) PARCEL (r080721204016/P1N R 1518086 PROPERTY CLASSIFICATION: This property in classified as: (Please check: one) X Commercial Residential _Vacant land Industrial Agricultural _Natural Resources Producing Mines Oil and Gas _State Assessed Exempt ATTACHMENTS TO THIS PETITION FORM: (Please check off the attachments you will be using) X The decision (County Board of Equalization, County Board of Commissioners, or Property Tax Administrator) that is being appealed. This attachment MUST be with the petition in order for it to be accepted for docketing. X The Assessor 's Notice of Denial . X The facts and law (the issue(s) involved) , on which this appeal is based. C.R.S 39-8-108 (1) X List of witnesses and exhibits to be used at the hearing. (Per BAA Rule 11 To be determined) X Exhibits, if any, to be used at the hearing. (Per BAA Rule 11 To be determined) ESTIMATED TIME FOR PETITIONER TO PRESENT THE APPEAL: 60 minutes or 1 hours REPRESENTATION: (Please check: appropriate responses) Petitioner will bo present at the hearing, or Petitione=r requests that the Board rule on the documentation submitted. Petitioner will be represented by a Colorado Attorney X yes, no. ,;2627 page 1 ta-i 7 N.1"% tO . :e (5) Cam;i2., of this petition form with all attachments and _xni,tit.... The or final (with original sianaature) plus three entire COP1eS (d tOtZi of four (4) ) are to be filed with the Board of Assessment Appeal_,; one entire copy to be filed with the Respondent (County Board of Equalization, County Commissioners or Property Tax Administrator) as shown in Certificate of Service; and one entire copy to be kept 4cr Petitioners records. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify to the Board of Assessment Appeals that I have mailed (or hand delivered) one copy of this petition form, together with all attachments and exhibits, to the Weld ( indicate one) County Board of Equalization, County Board of Commissioners, or Property Tax Administrator in Greeley Colorado, on August 29, 1990. ~� // ---'. Th Julie Greni y Petitioner 's signature Attorney for Ft-itioner Reg. No. 15025 640 E. Eisenhower Blvd. Petitioner 's mailing address Suite A Loveland, Colorado 8037 (30Z) 667-8968 Petitioner 's Telephone No. • tt 62, page 2 of • a�,.3 RESOLUTION I RE: THE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, 1990, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PETITION OF: HANSEN RIC 1136 E STUART SUITE 2160 FT COLLINS, CO 80525 DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: PIN_ gpOLE,�ARCEL: 080721204016 - WIN 22882 L14.1( 16 BLK9%513" % '- WEEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, organized as a Board of Equalization for the purpose of adjusting, equalizing, raising or lowering the assessment and valuation of real and personal property within this County, fixed and made by the County Assessor for the year . 1990, and WHEREAS, said petition has been heard before the County Assessor and due notice of adjustment thereon has been given to the taxpayer(s) , and WHEREAS, the taxpayer(s) presented a petition of appeal to the County,Assessor's valuation for the year 1990, claiming grounds for .relief thereunder stating the property described in such petition .was assessed too high, as more specifically stated in said petition, and, • WHEREAS,:n said petitioner being represented by North American Property Consultants,,,_ who submitted a letter regarding said petition, and WHEREAS, the Board has made its findings on the evidence, testimony and remonstrances and is now fully informed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County • Commissioners of Weld . County, --acting - as the Board of Equalization, that the evidence presented at the hearing clearly .supported the value placed upon the Petitioner's property,by the Weld County Assessor. Such evidence indicated the value was reasonable, equitable, and derived according to the methodologies, percentages, figures and formulas dictated to the Weld County Assessor by law. As such,, this Board. Pinds :that "the 'Petitioner failed to meet its burden of proving that the Assessor's 'valuation was incorrect. The assessment and valuation,of the Weld County-Assessor shall be, and hereby is, Raffirmed - • BE IT . FURTHER RESOLVED that a denial of a petition, in whole or in part, by the Board of Equalization may be appealed . by selecting one of the following three options: aloe L ,4 ;Qs. SECr y • �1 • Page 2 RE: BCE - HANSEN RIC 1. Board of Assessment Appeals: You have the right to appeal the County Board of Equalization's (CBOE's) decision to the Board of Assessment Appeals (BAA) . Such hearing is the final hearing at which testimony, exhibits or any other evidence may be introduced. If the decision of the BAA is further appealed to the Court of Appeals, only the record created at the BAA hearing shall be the basis for the Court's decision. No new evidence can be introduced at the Court of Appeals. (39-8-108(1) , CRS) Appeals to the BAA must be made on forms furnished by - the BAA, and should be mailed or delivered within thirty (30) days of denial by the CBOE to: Board of Assessment Appeals 1313 Sherman Street, Room 523 Denver, CO 80203 Phone: 866-5880 OR 2. District Court: You have the right to appeal the CBOE's decision to the District Court of the county wherein ' your property is located. _ New testimony; exhibits-, oriany other evidence may be introduced at the District'- Court- hearing. For filing requirements please contact your. attorne or the Clerk of the District Court. Further appeal',o2' the District Court's decision is made to.the` Court of Appeals ter.',' a review of the record. (39-8-108 (1) , CRS) OR • 3. Dindina arbitration: You have the right to submit your case to arbitration. If you choose this option the arbitrator's decision is ginal and your right to appeal your current valuation ends. (39-8-108.5, CRS) Selecting the Arbitrator - In order to pursue arbitration, you must notify the OBOE of your intent. You and the CEDE select an arbitrator from the official list of • qualified people. If you Cannot agree on an arbitrator,, the ," - District Court of the county in which the property, is located will make the selection. j'itration Rearing Procedure - Arbitration hearings. are held within sixty days: from the date the arbitrator .is , -* selected. Bosh you and the CEOE are entitled to participate.. The hearings are inxormal. The arbitrator has the authority 0 AZ; 2 ° �" i Page 3 RE: BOP. - HANSEN RTC to issue subpoenas for witnesses, books, records, documents and other evidence. He also has the power to administer oaths, and all questions of law and fact shall be determined by him. i The arbitration hearing may be confidential and closed to the public, , upon mutual agreement. The arbitrator's written decision must be delivered to both parties personally or by registered mail within ten (10) days of the hearing. Such decision is Sinai and not subject to review. Fees and Expenses - The arbitrator's fees and expenses are agreed upon by you and the OBOE. In the case of residential real property, such fees .and expenses cannot exceed $150.00 per case. The arbitrator's fees and expenses, not including counsel fees, are to be paid as provided in the decision. J The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, ado?ted by the following vote on the ,27th day of July, A.D 119/9/p. ATTEST: kJ/4�Ja4 _!/a _ BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS/ �cli/1 WEL OUNTY,. C RADO Weld County Clerk, to the Board ,_ . e ene R. Bran ner," Chairman • Deputy Clerk to the Board --." I (gorge Kennedy, Pro-Te "2-ROVED AS TO FORM: 76i--ZZ</r0 4,,m 474, . Constance L. Harbert .r` �, County Attorney c. w..- Kirby . amp.). . IEX Gordon E. Lacy Y1r(.Ew'`iJ ' . . .1�� \ c �uu.;ti I( \I 9 s 10th STREET NOTICE -OF—DENIAL GREELE5 COLORADO f.0631 F ONE'3031 56-1000 \ '_.6 ,3;q :� , .1F1 22tf82 L24 L 16 L:<9.:513 MAIN': 1''' O L... ,.u.,ul� _a. / • 513 MAIN • 0I.ANER HASSEN RIC _ • N.A.P.C. PARCEL M3O7212O4O1O PIN R 1518036 640 E.EISENRO:ilER1 STE. A YEAR 1990 LL'VELAND CO 8O537 LOG 00840 06/12/1990 The appraised value of property is based on the appropriate consideration of the approaches to value required by law.The Assessor has determined that your property should be included in the following Category(ies): _Residential property is valued by considering the cost and market approaches. Agricultural :and value is determined solely by the earning or production capacity of the land,capitalized at a rate set by law. Producing mines are assessed at 25%of the gross proceeds or 100%of the net proceeds,whichever is greater. Oil and gas leaseholds and lands are assessed at 87.5% of the gross value of the oil and/or gas sold or transported from the premises on primary production;secondary production is valued at 75%. All other property, including vacant land,is valued by considering the cost,market,and income approaches. If your concern is the amount of your property tax, local taxing authorities (county, city, fire protection, and other special districts) ho:d budget hearings in the fall. Please refer to your tax bill or ask your Assessor for a listing of these districts,and plan to attend those budget hearing:, The Assessor has Care)fully studied all available inf7ormation, giving! particular attentio{n to the specifics included on your protest and has deter• mired NOvaCNtANCEasHAS t8tEN pMADE TO reasons for UALLIA vacLW THIS PROPERTY* COLORADO LAW REQUIRES US TO SEND THIS NOTICE OF DENIAL FOR ALL PROPERTIES ON WHICH WE DO NOT ADJUST THE VALUE. ASSESSOR'S VALUATION PETITIONER'S PROPERTY CLASSIFICATION I ESTIMATE ACTUAL VALUE ACTUAL VALUE OF VALUE PRIOR TO REVIEW AFTER REVIEW LAND 193 000 29000 I.PS 661914 683914 I ii TOTALS $ S tS7 r 91-4 $ t3!'91 If you disrgree with the Assessor's decision,you have the right to appeal to the County Goard of Equalization for further ConsEeration, S^-G•10J(:)(a),C,R,S, Please see the back of this form for detailed information on filing your appeal. By:___ RICHARD W. KEIR\ES O6/21/7O WELD COUNTY ASSESSOR c� C �� ls JUN 5 1S�� t r-Ao . . A^1 {�^n Arnim In1C In I nv psr pppS' SL • =£TIT:uN TO IRE STATE SCARE, CP ASSESSMENT�; hPF'E. LE Date: Auvuat 23 , 1990 TO T'r.E HONORABLE BOARD OF ASSESSMENT APPEALS: Your Petitioner, Dorothy/William Rogers (name of property owner) 1407 11th St. - Greeley, CO (Street address, City, State, Zip Code of subject property) hereby appeals the decision of the (check one) X County Board of Equalization !County Hoard of Commissioners _Property Tax Adminis :rator for property located in the County of Weld that was dated August 17, 1990, concerning (check: ono) X Valuation _Ref"und _Exemption ,Abatement for the year (~) 1990. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: (Legal description - if multiple properties are involved in the one decision being appealed, a listing of the county schedule or parcel numbers with the cor•respondinq properties - must be submitted as an attachment to the petition) PARCEL x0961064290</PIN R 3029186 PROPERTY CLASSIFICATION: This property is classified as: (Please check one) Commercial X Residential Vacant lend _Industrial _Agricultural Natural Resources _Producing Mines Oil and Gas _State Assessed Exempt ATTACHMENTS TO THIS PETITION FORM,: (please chock off the attachments you will be using) X The decision (County Board of Equalization, County Board of Commissioner,, or Property Tax Administrator) that is being appealed. This attachment MUST be with the petition in order for it to be accepted for docketinq. X The Assessor 's Notice of Denial . X The facts and law (the issue(s) involved) , on which this appeal is based. C.R.S 39—E-108 (1) X List of witnesses and exhibits to be used at the hearing_ . (Per BAA Rule 11 To be determined) ' X Exhibits, if any, to be used at the hearing. (Per BAA Rule 11 To be determined) ESTIMATED TIME FOR PETITIONER TO PRESENT THE APPEAL: 60 minute, or 1 hours REPRESENTATION: (Please check: appropriate responses) Petitioner will be present at the hearing, or Petitioner requests that the Board rule on the documentation submitted. Petitioner will be represented by a Colorado Attorney_ X__Yos, no. ,I2659 page 1 of 2 i i flys. f dcpt s c•f this petition Term with x.11 :;.tta.cment_. and e :hibito. T` er,;.f_ na.l (with eri9inal signature) plus t'hroe entire copies (a otai Tour (4) ) are to be filed with the Board of Aesossment Appeals; one entire copy to be filed with the fespondont (County Board of Equalization, County Commissioners or Property Tax Administrator) as shown in Certificate of Service; and one entire copy to be kept for- Petitioner 's records. CFRTIFiCATE CF SERVICE I certify to the Board of Assessment Appeals that have mailed (or hand delivered) ones copy dT this petition form, together with all attachments and e::} ibit: 1 to the Weld ( indicate one) County Board of Equalization, County Board of Commissioners, or Property Tax Administrator- in Greeley Colorado, on August 29, 1990. (Th �-^-`- r Julie Greni Petitioner 's signature Attorney for Pe6 ' ioner Reg. No. 150= 640 E. Eisenhower Blvd. Petitioner 's mailing address Suite A Loveland, Colorado SO5.17 i (Z0.7.7)) 667--8968 P'etitioner's telephone No. i I #2659 page 2 of 2 • 4-2-‘51 RESOLUTION RE: THE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, 1990, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PETITION OF: ROGERS WILLIAM H & DOROTHY W 1407 11 ST GREELEY, CO 80631 DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: PINF`'�•K3Cx9Z8EriPARCEL: 096106429023 - GR 2701 S140' & W10' OF Nr"frOFWL22 & Z16' L21 W7' OF S140' L23BLK71 HUNTERSt1407 11TH STS WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, organized as a Board of Equalization for the purpose of adjusting, equalizing, raising or lowering the assessment and valuation of real and personal property within this County, fixed and made by the County Assessor for the year 1990, and WHEREAS, said petition has been heard before the County Assessor and due notice of adjustment thereon has been given to the taxpayer(s) , and WHEREAS, the taxpayer(s) presented a petition of appeal to the County Assessor's valuation for the year 1990, claiming grounds for relief thereunder stating the property described in such petition was assessed too high, as more specifically- stated in said petition, and WHEREAS, said petitioner being represented by North American Property Consultants who submitted a letter regarding said petition, and WHEREAS, the Board has made its findings on the evidence, testimony and remonstrances and is now fully informed. -NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County -- Commissioners of Weld County, acting as the Board of Equalization, that the evidence presented at the hearing clearly supported the value placed upon the Petitioner's property by the Weld County Assessor. Such evidence indicated the value was reasonable, equitable, and derived according to the methodologies, p 'rcentages, figures and formulas dictated to the Weld County Assessor by law. As such, this Board finds that the Petitioner failed to meet its burden of proving that the Assessor's -valuation wan incorrect. The assessment and valuation of the Weld CountICA se<sor shall be, and hereby is, affirmed. • ' I Page 2 RE: BOE - ROGERS WILLIAM H & DOROTHY W BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a denial of a petition, in whole or in part, by the Board of Equalization may be appealed by selecting mu of the following three options: 1. Board 0;: Assessment Appeals: You have the right to appeal the County Board of Equalization's (CBOE's) decision .o the Board of Assessment Appeals (BAA) . Such hearing is the final hearing at which testimony, exhibits or any other vidence may be introduced. If the decision of the BAA is irther appealed to the Court of Appeals, 2nly the record seated at the BAA hearing shall be the basis for the Court's ,ecision. No new evidence can be introduced at the Court of Appeals. (39-8-108(1) , CRS) Appeals to the BAA must be made on forms furnished by the BAA, and should be mailed or delivered within thirty (30) days of denial by the OBOE to: Board of Assessment Appeals 1313 Sherman Street, Room 523 Denver, c0 80203 Phone: 866-5880 OR 2. District Court: You have the right to appeal the CBOE's decision to the District Court of the county wherein your property is located. New testimony, exhibits or any other evidence may be introduced at the District Court hearing. For filing requirements please contact your attorney or the Clerk of the District Court. Further appeal of the District Court's decision is made to the Court of Appeals for a review of the record. (39-8-108(1) , CRS) OR r 3 . Binding Arbitration: You have the right to submit your case to arbitration.- If you choose this option the arbitrator's decision is final and your right to appeal your current valuation ends. (39-8-108.5, CRS) . gelcctina the Arbitrator -. In order to pursue arbitration, you must notify the CBOE of your intent. . You and the CBOE select an arbitrator from the official list of qualified people. If you cannot agree on an arbitrator, the District Court of the county in which the property is located will make the selection. hflitration UPating Procedure Arbitration hearings are held within sixty days from the date the arbitrator is selected. Both you and the CBOE are entitled to participate. The hearings are informal. The arbitrator has the authority r Page 3 RE: POE - R3GERS WILLIAM H & DOROTHY W to issue subpoenas for witnesses, books, records, docubents and ocher evidence. He also has the power to administer oaths, and all questions of law and fact shall be determined by him. The arbitration hearing may be confidential and closed to the public, upon mutual agreement. The arbitrator's written decision must be delivered to both parties personally or by registered mail within ten (10) days of the hearing. Such decision is and not subject to review. i Fees and Exbenses - The arbitrator's fees and expenses are agreed upon by you and the OBOE. In the case of residential real property, such fees and expenses cannot exceed $150.00 per case. The arbitrator's fees and expenses, ` not including counsel fees, are to be paid as provided in the 4 decision. { I The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the z7tA ' day of J1y ADO.i �l�fyJ� ATTEST: E" AFT) OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS W�L OUNTY, COLORADO 1 Weld County Clerk o the Board Gene R. Brantner, Chairman • 'Deputy Clerk t the Board L ��- .Ay i GG ge Kennedy, Pro-Ta •�' A D AS TO FORM: ,7 - , k.14,11 Constance L. Harbert • . county Attorney C. W. Kirby (EXCUSED) .- Gordon E. Lacy l i E ,� h pry --7.\\\ c1 cots:l:,SSLssc:. _ 91 ,CO T iiCTIC" DENIAL GRFFLLYI'.COLORADAD05063: PHONE(3n31 re.- :00, FST.a:`(. i 'r j n rr j ,,,�„ 1 v v I Crw w ! 1, G:: 7C 5140 .:10 4, il-rO1 CL2_ E16 1 '.J 1 ✓ C •'7t C: ..140r LIVZLL.71 HU:ITE:i :.407 11TH ST Ca LC.ThRr.rO 1407 11Th 9.T OWNER ROGERS WILLIAM H L DOROTHY W N.A.P.C. PARCEL 096206429027 - PIN R 3029136 640 E.ZISINHO.4ER, STE. A TZAR 1990 LOVCLAND CO 60537 LOG 00342 ; 06/12/1990 I The appraised value of property is based on the appropriate consideration of the approaches to value required by law,The Assessor has determined that your property should be included in the foliowing eategory6es): i -Residential property is valued by considering the cost and market approaches. s Agricultural land value is determined solely by the earning or production capacity of the land,capitalized at a rate set by law. -Rroducir^mines are assessed at 25%of the gross proceeds or 100%of the net proceeds,whichever is greater, � -Oil and gas leasehold: and land; are assessed at 87.5`,5 of the gross value of the oil and/or gas sold or transported from the premises on primary production;secondary production is valued at 75%. _All other property,including vacant land,is valued by considering the cost,market,and income approaches. If your concern is the amount of your property tax, local taxing authorities (county,city, fire protection, and other special districts; hed budget hearings in the fall. Pi case refer to your tax bill or ask your Assessorfor a listing of these districts,and plan to attend these budget hearin;s. The Assessor has�enarefuily studied all available information, giving particular attention to the specifics included on your protest and has deter- I mined thg va uationiL �;,ti=nYd to ypur ronerty The r.^;nns for thiS edeteeni.r tin f va y 1 LPELJ UNIFUAML1 AJJCJJC:� OS.Lu.�f'IC COLORADO LA:4 AND ! INSTRUCTIONS PUBLISHED I3Y THE STATE DIVISION OF PROPERTY TAXATION. j COMPARISONS WITH OTHER SIMILAR PROPERTIES INDICATES YOUR VALUE IS T PROPER AT THE 1980 VALUE LEVEL REQUIRED aY LAN. ; i I r I PETITIONER'S I ASSESSOR'S VALUATION I PROPERTY CLASSIFICATION I ESTIMATE ACTUAL VALUE ACTUAL VALUE I - - -- - - - - -- I - OF VALUE - , PRIOR TO REVIEW ' AFTER REVIEW -I i I I LAND , 15) 930 15,930 IMPS I 60, b5I 60,::51 j , j 1 i TOTALS $ $ 7977fl S lis /Jr' Ii you di:nuee^with the Assessor's decision,you have the right to appeal to the County Coard of Equalization for further consideration, C,R.S. Please see the back of this form for detailed information on filing your appeal. RICHARD W. KEIRNES •e.•/Ic/�iG Cy: _ WELD COL:VEYASSESSOR FCrG�V:� 1 I'-,. S7 nnr?!TI. n!n, 1�,.-n n..n7�/�n., �\� naVCC ... —._- � ::.7:7I7IEN 7C THE STATE BOARD OF ASSESSMENT APPEALS Date: August 28 . 1990 TO ",HE HONORABLE BOARD OF ASSESSMENT APPEALS: Your Petitioner. Dorothy/William Rogers (name of property owner) 706 12th St. - Greeley, CO 80631 (Street address, City, State, Zip Code of subject property) hereby appeals the decision of the (check. one) X County Board of Equalisation _County Board of Commissioners Property Tax Administrator for property located in the County of Weld that was dated August 17. 1990, concerning (check one) X Valuation Refund Exemption _Abatement for rho year (s) 1990. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: (Legal description - if multiple prepertiec are involved in the one decision being appealed, a listing of the county schedule or parcel numbers with the corresponding properties - must be submitted as an attachment to the petition) PARCEL 4096108200021/PIN R 0070688 PROPERTY CLASSIFICATION: This property is classified as: (Please: check one) _Commercial X Residential _Vacant land Industrial Agricultural Natural Resources Producing Mines Oil and Gas State Assessed Exempt ATTACHMENTS TO THIS PETITION FORM: (Please check off the attachments you will be using) X The decision (County Board of Equalization, County Board of Commissioners, or Property Tax Administrator) that is being appealed. This attachment MUST be with the petition in order for it to be accepted for docketing. X The Assessor 's Notice of Denial. X The +acts and law (the issue (s) involved) , on which this appeal is based. C.R.S 39-S-103 (1) X List of witnesses and exhibits to be used at the hearing. (Per SAA Rule 11 To be determined) X Exhibits, if any, to be used at the hearinp. (Per PAA Rule 11 To be determined) ESTIMATED TIME FOR PETITIONER TO PRESENT THE APPEAL: 60 minutes or 1 hours REPRESENTATION: (Please check appropriate responses) Petitioner will be present at the hearing, or Petitioner requests that the Board rule on the documentation submitted. Petitioner will be represented by a Colorado Attorney , _r o. ?_659 page 1 of • • ;9'.Y.e five (:) copies of this petition form with all zItt,al..nment's and exhibits. The or :Ginal (with orisinal signature) three _n ire copies (a total of four (fir) ) are to be filed . with the Board of Assessment Appeals: one entire cony to be fi 2ed with the Respondent (County Soard of Equalization, County Commissioners or Property Tax Administrator) as shown in Certificate of Service; and cno entire copy to be kept for Petitioner's record_. CERT-F7CATE ("IF SERVT~E 1 certify to the Board of Asdessment Appeals that I have mailed (or hand delivered) one cony of th .s petition form. together- with all attachments and exhibits, to the Weld (indicate ono) County Board of Equalization, County Board of Commissioners, or Property Tax Administrator in Greeley Colorado. on August ?9, 1990. • 1 �\ Tulz�� Greni \T 41 Petitioner 's signature �A��ttorney for F'tititioner flog. No. 15025 640 E. Eisenhower Blvd. Petitioner 's mailing address Suite A Loveland, Colorado SU5Z7 (.30Z) 667-8968 P'etitioner 's Telephone No. #42659 pass 2 of 4-Pb59 RESOLUTION RE: THE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, 1990, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PETITION OF: ROGERS WILLIAM H & DOROTHY W 1407 11 ST GREELEY, CO 80631 DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: P-`: C rMari 2PARCEL: 096108200021 - GR 5474 N90' Ll BLX98%706 12�5'f -� WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, organized as a Board of Equalization for the purpose of adjusting, equalizing, raising or lowering the assessment and valuation of real and personal property within this County, fixed and made by the County Assessor for the year 1990, and WHEREAS, said petition has been heard before the County Assessor and due notice of adjustment thereon has been given to the taxpayer(s) , and • WHEREAS, the taxpayer(s) presented a petition of appeal to the. County Assessor's valuation for the year 1990, claiming grounds for relief thereunder stating the property described in such petition was assessed too high, as more specifically stated in said petition, and WHEREAS, said ; petitioner .:being '- represented by North American Property Consultants, who submitted a letter regarding said petition, and WHEREAS, the Board has made its findings on the evidence, • testimony and remonstrances and is now fully informed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld - County;< : aeting as the Board - -of Equalization, that the evidence presented at the hearing clearly supported the value placed upon the Petitioner's • property by the Weld County,Assessor.• Such evidence indicated the value was reasonable, equitable, and derived according to the methodologies, percentages,-.figures and formulas dictated to the Weld County Assessor by law. -As As such; this Board;.finds that the Petitioner failed to meet, its' burden of proving that the Assessor's valuation was incorrect. The assessment and valuation of the Weld County ASdeS er;shall be, and hereby in, f f irt.ed. • - BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a. denial of a petition, in whole or in part, by the Board of, Equalization may be appealed by selecting ong of the following three options: � ` r ^,3ra2 , , r Page 2 RE: ROE - ROGERS WILLIAM H & DOROTHY W 1. poard of A,ssmment Ap+ptpeas: You have the right to appeal the County Board of Equalization's (CBOE's) decision to the Board of Assessment Appeals (BAA) . Such hearing is the final hearing at which testimony, exhibits or any other evidence may be introduced. If the decision of the BAA is further appealed to the Court of Appeals, only the record created at the BAA hearing shall be the basis for the Court's decision. No new evidence can be introduced at the court of Appeals. (39-8-108(1) , CRS) Appeals to the BAA must be made on forms furnished by the BAA, and should be mailed or delivered within thirty (30) days of denial by the CBOE to: Board of Assessment Appeals 1313 Sherman Street, Room 523 • Denver, CO 80203 Phone: 866-5880 OR 2. District Court: You have the right to appeal the CBOE's decision to the District Court of the county wherein your property is located., New testimony, exhibits or any other- evidence may be introduced at the District Court hearing. : For filing requirements please contact your attorney or the ,Clerk of the District Court. =Further appeal ef . the - i District.Court's decision is made to the Court of Appeals for a review of the record. (39-8-108(1) , CRS) OR 3. Dingp5 Arbitration: You have the right to submit your case to arbitration. If you choose this option the arbitrator's decision is final and your right' to appeal your current valuation ends. (39-8-108.5, CRS) Selecting the Arbitrator In . order to pursue arbitration, you must notify the CBOE of your intent. You and the OBOE select an arbitrator . from the official list of qualified people. If you cannot agree on an arbitrator, the i District Court of the county in which the property is located will make the selection. • 1�itcation Hearing , eedire - Arbitration hearing: are held within sixty days from the date the arbitrator is selected. Both you,and the OBOE are' entitled to participatt‹. The hearing, are informal . The arbitrator has the stIthoiie? ) _ ,,„,:rr.‘�, . . r Page 3 RE: BOE - ROGERS WILLIAM H & DOROTHY W to issue subpoenas for witnesses, books, records, documents and other evidence. He also has the power to administer oaths, and all questions of law and fact shall be determined by him. The arbitration hearing may be confidential and closed to the public; upon mutual agreement. The arbitrator's written decision must be delivered to both parties personally or by registered mail within ten (10) days of the hearing. Such decision is Liza and not subject to review. Fees and Expenses - The arbitrator's fees and expenses are agreed upon by you and the CBOE. In the case of residential real property, such fees and expenses cannot exceed $150. 00 per case. The arbitrator's fees and expenses, not including counsel fees, are to be paid as provided in the decision. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the. Zat day of July, A.D. , 1990. ATTEST. G/getBOARD OF COUNTY CO.�SSIONERS � WEL LINTY, CO RADO Weld County Clerk to the Board Gene R. Brantner, Chairman • Deputy Clerk to the Board Ge/ ge Kennedy, Pro-Te L APP$OzFED AS TO FORM: 0-'45j 7_"---yf✓ ' �1��f on Lance L. Her ert County Attorney C. 4. Kirby Gordon E. Lacy E r��C LC.53 "` r �� // -+7 915 10th STREET :SL`T'C3 01= DENIAL �� GREELEY,COLORADO€063; ' 7i:JNE(303)3564000. EXT.=__`6 i rrrr + i� � GR 5474 7:90s L1 GL:i?iii7Co 1» ST': I 'e.;\ 3 . Q ' i . (� :i i„I cotemADO OWNER ROGERS •AILLIAH H G DOROTHY :i ' N.A.P.C. PARCEL 096108200021 PIN R 0070688 t 640 E.E-I:ENHOV,IERa STE. A YEAR 1990 LOVLL ARID CO 00537 LOG 001341 t. 06/12/1990 The appraised value of property is based on the appropriate consideration of the approaches to value required by law.The Assessor has determined that your property should be included in the following eategory(ies): r Residential property is valued by considering the cost and market approaches. -Agricultural land value is determined solely by the earning or production capacity of the land,capitalized at a rate set by law. • -Producing mines are assessed at 25°5 of the gross proceeds or 100%of the net proceeds,whichever is greater. i —Oil and gas leaseholds and lands are assessed at S7,5% of the gross value of the oil and/or gas sold or transported from the premises on I primary production;secondary production is valued at 75x.. 1 All other property,including vacant land,is valued by considering the cost,market,and income approaches. If your concern is the amount of your property tax, local taxing authorities (county,city, fire protection, and other special districts) hold t budget hearings in the fall. Please refer to your tax bill or ask your Assessor for a listing of these districts,and plan to attend these budget hearings. The Assessor has carefully studied all available information, giving particular attention to the specifics included on your protest and has deter- mined the valuationlsl atsioned to your property.The reasons for this determination_of v e are; r NO CHAUfat MAS BEEN OADL TO THE ACTUAL VALUAT�IUN br THIS PROPERTY. COLORADO LAW REQUIRES US TO SEND THIS NOTICE OF DENIAL FOR ALL PROPERTIES ON WHICH WE DO NOT ADJUST THE VALUE. • RECEIVED JUN 2 9 1990 PETITIONER'S ASSESSOR'S VALUATION PROPERTY CLASSIFICATION ESTIMATE ACTUAL VALUE ACTUAL VALUE- .. _ __ _ _ ___ _ _ - _ OF VALUE PRIOR TO REVIEW AFTER REVIEW 1 I - LAND 153750 15x750 IMPS 72,071 723871 I • TOTALS S S Sya621 5 tsusL.:1 1f you r';segrce with the Assessor's decision,you hove the right to appeal to the County Board of Equalization for further consideration, 3'3.3-1C (i)(a),C.R.S. Please see the back of this form for detailed information on filing your appeal. ey: RICHARD V . IEIRNES oe/�a/90 : WELD COUNTY ASSESSOR DATE 6 ac, 15-OPT AO ADO iTIONAL INFORMATION ON REVERSE SIDE � e� rtimn DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES Cases Approved by Administrative Review 8/17/90 through 8/31/90 S CASE NUMBER NAME t IPME-1618 Riedimgar 1 RE-1248 Trostel, et al. C4CVAZ!Ca`al+w Chuck Cunliffe, Director w HEARING CERTIFICATION DOCKET N0. 90-27 RE: SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND AMENDED SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT - LIVESTOCK CONFINEMENT OPERATION (1,500 CATTLE) , HORSE BOARDING AND TRAINING FACILITY (150 HEAD) , AND TACK AND FEED STORE - JEFFERSON A public hearing was conducted on August 29, 1990, at 10:00 A.M., with the following present: Commissioner Gene R. Brantner, Chairman - Excused Commissioner George Kennedy, Pro-Tem Commissioner Constance L. Harbert Commissioner C.w. Kirby - Excused Commissioner Gordon E. Lacy Also present: Acting Clerk to the Board, Tommie Antuna Assistant County Attorney, Lee D. Morrison Planning Department representative, Lanell Curry The following business was transacted: I hereby certify that pursuant to a notice dated July 2, 1990, and duly published July 12, 1990, in The New News, a public hearing was conducted to consider a Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit for Joy A. Jefferson. Commissioner Kirby excused himself from this hearing due to a conflict of interest. Lee Morrison, Assistant County Attorney, made this matter of record. Mr. Morrison advised the applicant that because only three Commissioners are present, he can request that this hearing be continued. Russell Anson, Attorney representing the applicant, said that he would prefer that this hearing be continued. Mr. Morrison stated that Mr. Anson submitted a copy of a letter which was sent to the Windsor Planning Commission. This letter concerns the conflicting recommendations of the Windsor Planning Commission. In this letter Mr. Anson states that the Windsor Planning Commission, at its meeting of May 3, 1990, recommended approval of this request from Joy Jefferson, then at a meeting conducted on August 2, 1990, the Commission reversed its recommendation. The letter further states that Ms. Jefferson was not advised that this item was to be considered at this later meeting. Following discussion, Mr. Morrison suggested that the Board ask this Commission to clarify its position. He also said that due process requirements must be met. Lanell Curry, representing the Department of Planning Services, made comments to the Board. Ms. Curry said the Windsor Planning Commission will meet again September 6. Commissioner Lacy moved to continue this hearing to September 12, at 10:00 A.M., and that this matter be referred to the Windsor Planning Commission with the information submitted at today's meeting. Commissioner Harbert seconded the motion. Mr. Morrison explained to the Board what the issue is in respect to the proceedings of the Windsor Planning Commission. He said the Commissioners must question what the Commission's position is, and whether it properly reached that position. Mr. Morrison said this will give the Windsor Planning Commission the opportunity to answer both of these concerns. Bob Ehrlich, of Amigo Farms, said he would like to clarify the issue concerning the Windsor Planning Commission. Mr. Ehrlich said he was not contacted for the first meeting; therefore, Amigo Farms was not represented at that meeting. He said at the later date, the Commission, after hearing the testimony from representatives of Amigo Farms, reversed its recommendation. Mr. Ehrlich also questioned whether there is a potential conflict of interest, saying that Mr. Anson was the County Attorney for a number of years, and is now the Chairman of the Republican Party. He said he is concerned about the close contact with the Republican Board members. Mr. Morrison said Commissioners Harbert and Brantner, pursuant to Section 24-18-109, 900781 ac � � Page 2 RE: CERTIFICATION - JEFFERSON C.R.S., did file Disclosure Letters with the Board of County Commissioners and the Secretary o£ State. He said these letters are of public record, and he read a portion of them into the record. Mr. Morrison explained that the Board cannot be deprived of its jurisdiction in this situation based on a claim of conflict. He said he is advising the Board to proceed to participate at the next hearing and explained why. Commissioner Lacy called for the vote. Chairman Pro-Tem Kennedy felt that Mr. Anson should be given a chance to respond to Mr. Ehrlich's statements. Mr. Anson said he would not respond to the issue of conflict, saying it is clear enough and also the Board has received the advice of its attorney. He said it has been eight years since he worked in the County Attorney's Office. Mr. Anson said he has never discussed this issue with any of the Commissioners, Republican or otherwise. On a roll call vote the motion passed with all three Commissioners voting aye. This Certification was approved on the 5th day of September, 1990. APPROVED: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County Cl rk to 4 EXCUSED Gene R. Brantner, Chairman By: S QJJ�i `�.t 0 0)19 — •� �s' -� Deputy erk to the Board Geo ge Kennedy, Pro-Tem _ Constance L. Harber EXCUSED FROM THIS HEARING C.W. Kir don . acy TAPE 490-32 DOCKET 490-27 PL0050 900781 rr► / HEARING CERTIFICATION DOCKET NO. 90-31 RE: HEARING TO SHOW CAUSE FOR REVOCATION OF SPECIAL USE PERMIT #208 - HESSEE A public hearing was conducted on August 29, 1990, at 10:00 A.M. , with A the following present: Commissioner Gene R. Brantner, Chairman - Excused Commissioner George Kennedy, Pro-Tem Commissioner Constance L. Harbert Commissioner C.W. Kirby Commissioner Gordon E. Lacy Also present: Acting Clerk to the Board, Tommie Antuan Assistant County Attorney, Lee D. Morrison Planning Department representative, Lanell Curry The following business was transacted: I hereby certify that pursuant to a notice dated July 11, 1990, and duly published August 16, 1990, in The New News, a public hearing was conducted to consider whether Special Use Permit #208 issued to Richard Hessee, should be revoked. Lee Morrison, Assistant County Attorney, made this matter of record. Lanell Curry, representing the Department of Planning Services, said Mr. Hessee has submitted an Amended Special Use Permit. She said the Planning staff recommends that this matter be continued to November 21, 1990, to allow the staff time to process the application and time for it to be considered by the Planning Commission and the Commissioners. Tom Cope, representing Mr. Hessee, came forward to make comments and answer questions of the Board. Linda and Joel Schoneman, adjacent landowners, said that the issue of the existing corrals, which are in violation of the current SUP, should be resolved before an Amended SUP is considered by the Board. Mr. Morrison explained the procedure to Mr. and Mrs. Schoneman. He said if the Amended SUP is denied, then the procedure to revoke the original SUP would go on. Richard Parker, adjacent landowner, also had questions concerning this procedure. Following discussion, Commissioner Lacy moved to continue this matter to November 7, 1990, at 10:00 A.M. Seconded by Commissioner Kirby, the motion carried unanimously. This Certification was approved on the 5th day o£ August, 1990. APPROVED: ATTEST: Ada444 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County Clerk to the Board EXCUSED M� /fin, , ��y� �7 n _ , Gene R. Brantnerr,,/Chairman By: Deputy lerk to the Board Ge a Kennedy, Pro-Tem Constance L. Harbert C.W.�Kirby� TAPE #90-32 DOCKET #90-31 EXCUSED DATE OF APPROVAL _ PL0749 Gordon E. Lacy 900782 ce . P1 HEARING CERTIFICATION DOCKET N0. 90-28 RE: AMEND SECTIONS 20.1.3, 20.3, 20.3.1, AND 30.2.9 OF WELD COUNTY BUILDING CODE ORDINANCE A public hearing was conducted on August 29, 1990, at 10:00 A.M., with the following present: Commissioner Gene R. Brantner, Chairman - Excused Commissioner George Kennedy, Pro-Tem Commissioner Constance L. Harbert Commissioner C.W. Kirby Commissioner Gordon E. Lacy Also present: Acting Clerk to the Board, Tommie Antuna Assistant County Attorney, Lee D. Morrison Planning Department representative, Chuck Cunliffe The following business was transacted: I hereby certify that pursuant to a notice dated July 18, 1990, and duly published July 26, August 2, 9, and 16, 1990, in The New News, a public hearing was conducted to consider amending certain sections of the Wald County Building Code Ordinance. Chuck Cunliffe, Director of the Department of Planning Services, made the proposed amendments of record. Lee Morrison, Assistant County Attorney, read Ordinance No. 119-G, In The Matter of an Amendment to Ordinance No. 119, Weld County Building Code Ordinance, Revising Certain Procedures, Terms, Requirements, and Incorporating by Reference Certain Portions of the Uniform Building Code, 1988 Edition: National Electrical Code, 1990 Edition: and Appendices to all Uniform Codes, into the record. There was no public comment offered at this hearing. Commissioner Lacy moved to approve the first reading of Ordinance No. 119-G. Commissioner Kirby seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. This Certification was approved on the 5th day of September, 1990. APPROVED: iliteett Y COMMISSIONERS BOARD OF COUNTY ATTEST: WELD COUNTY, Weld County Clerk to the Board EXCUSED Gene R. BLantner, Chairman BY: 1.S K. J � �-(YXO�v �S Deputy C erk to the Board Gene Kennedy, Pro- T eem Constance L. Harbert C.W. Kirby� - EXCUSED DATE OF APPROVAL Gordon E. Lacy TAPE *90-32 DOCKET #90-28 ORD N0. 119-G ORD 119-6 Cc ; HEARING CERTIFICATION DOCKET NO. 90-35 RE: SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT FOR LIVESTOCK CONFINEMENT OPERATION - PICKERT A public hearing was conducted on August 29, 1990, at 10:00 A.M., with the following present: Commissioner Gene R. Brantner, Chairman - Excused Commissioner George Kennedy, Pro-Tem Commissioner Constance L. Harbert Commissioner C.W. Kirby Commissioner Gordon E. Lacy Also present: Acting Clerk to the Board, Tommie Antuna Assistant County Attorney, Lee D. Morrison Planning Department representative, Keith Schuett The following business was transacted: I hereby certify that pursuant to a notice dated August 13, 1990, and duly published August 16, 1990, in The New News, a public hearing was conducted to consider a Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit for a livestock confinement operation (1,000 head dairy with six residences) requested by William Bradley Pickert and Everdina Ann Marie Pickert. Lee Morrison, Assistant County Attorney, made this matter of record. Keith Schuett, representing the Department of Planning Services, entered the favorable recommendation of the Planning Commission into the record. Mr. Schuett said this recommendation is subject to four Conditions and sixteen Development Standards. Brad Pickert, one of the applicants, came forward to answer questions of the Board. Mr. Pickert said he has no problem with the Conditions and Standards. There was no public comment offered concerning this matter. Commissioner Lacy moved to approve this Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit subject to the recommended Conditions and Development Standards. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Harbert, and it carried unanimously. This Certification was approved on the 5th day of September, 1990. APPROVED: Wel% BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County Clerk to the Board EXCUSED nn Gene R. Brantner, Chairman By: Y� indhA) J Deputy yserk)- to the Board o e Kennedy, Pro-Tem Constance L. Harbert C.W. Kirby EXCUSED DATE OF APPROVAL Gordon E. Lacy TAPE 890-32 DOCKET 890-35 PL0815 900783 L�.y ' RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS • MINUTES BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO SEPTEMBER 5, 1990 TAPE $90-32 The Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, met in regular session in full conformity with the law and bylaws of said Board at the regular place of meeting in the Weld County Centennial Center, Greeley, Colorado, September 5, 1990, at the hour of 9:00 A.M. ROLL CALL: The meeting was called to order by the Chairman and on roll call the following members were present, constituting a quorum of the members thereof: Commissioner Gene R. Brantner, Chairman Commissioner George Kennedy, Pro-Ten - Arrived later Commissioner Constance L. Harbert Commissioner C.W. Kirby Commissioner Gordon E. Lacy - Excused Also present: Assistant Weld County Attorney, Bruce Barker Acting Clerk to the Board, Shelly Miller MINUTES: Commissioner Harbert moved to approve the minutes of the Board of County Commissioners meeting of August 29, 1990, as printed. Commissioner Kirby seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. Let the record reflect that Commissioner Kennedy is now present. CERTIFICATIONS OF HEARINGS: Commissioner Kirby moved to approve the Certifications for the hearings conducted on August 29, 1990, as follows: 1) Special Review Permit, Jefferson; 2) Show Cause Hearing, }lessee; 3) Amend Weld County Building Code Ordinance; and 4) Special Review Permit, Pickert. Commissioner Kennedy seconded the motion, and it carried with Chairman Brantner Abstaining because he was excused from said hearings. ADDITIONS: There were no additions to today's agenda. CONSENT AGENDA: Commissioner Kennedy moved to approve the consent agenda as printed. Commissioner Harbert seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. PRESENTATION: RECOGNITION OF SERVICES - RAY A. WEST: Chairman Brantner read the Certificate of Appreciation into the record, and presented it to Ray A. West who is retiring from the Road and Bridge Department. DEPARTMENT HEADS AND ELECTED OFFICIALS: Paul Stoddard, Coroner, was not present to give his scheduled report. WARRANTS: Don Warden presented the following warrants for approval by the Board: General fund $209,428.63 Payroll fund 71,871.45 social Services 235,523.86 Handwritten warrants: General 520.00 Payroll 475,593.81 Commissioner Kennedy moved to approve the warrants as presented by Mr. Warden. Commissioner Harbert seconded the motion which carried unanimously. BIDS: CONSIDER SOLE-SOURCE PURCHASE OF HEADSETS - AMBULANCE SERVICE: Mr. Warden said that the Ambulance Service needs two additional headsets. Mark Johnson, representing the Ambulance Service, was present to explain dual-band radio system which is made by David Clark. He said the cost for both headsets would be $5,260. Commissioner Harbert moved to approve the sole-source purchase of the headsets for the Ambulance Service. Commissioner Kennedy seconded the motion which carried unanimously. APPROVE WELD COUNTY BRIDGES 78/13A AND 80.5/17A: Mr. Warden said the lowest combined bid submitted was from Paramount Construction in the amount of $263,000. Commissioner Kirby moved to accept the low bid for both bridges. Commissioner Kennedy seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. BUSINESS: NEW: CONSIDER LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN FENWC AND HOUSE OF NEIGHBORLY SERVICE AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN: Marilyn Carlin, representing the Human Resources Department, explained the Lease Agreement with the House of Neighborly Service. She said this Agreement is for the Head Start Preschool Program in Brighton. Commissioner Kennedy moved to approve said Lease Agreement and authorize the Chairman to sign. The motion, seconded by Commissioner Kirby, carried unanimously. CONSIDER LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN FENWC AND TRINITY HOUSE CORPORATION AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN: Ms. Carlin said this Agreement is for the Head Start Preschool Program in Greeley. Commissioner Kennedy moved to approve said Lease Agreement and authorize the Chairman to sign. Commissioner Harbert seconded the motion which carried unanimously. CONSIDER 1990 FENWC CHILD CARE FOOD PROGRAM GRANT APPLICATION AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN: Ms. Carlin° explained the Grant Application saying that it is for reimbursement to the Family Educational Network for meals served to Head Start and Migrant Head Start children. Commissioner Kennedy moved to approve said Grant Application and authorize the Chairman to sign. Commissioner Harbert seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. CONSIDER PURCHASE OF SERVICES AGREEMENTS WITH VARIOUS DENTISTS AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN: Ms. Carlini) said there are four Agreements with local dentists to provide services for Family Educational Network children. Commissioner Kirby moved to approve said Agreements and authorize the Chairman to sign. Commissioner Kennedy seconded the motion which carried unanimously. Minutes - September 5, 1990 Page 2 J CONSIDER PROTEST CONCERNING MOWING SERVICES BY PEST AND WEED DEPARTMENT - EICHLER: Bruce Barker, Assistant County Attorney, explained that Haiko Eichler could not be present today and needed more time to review the documents provided to him by the County. Mr. Barker also explained the complaint of Mr. Eichler, and that Mr. Eichler has the right to appeal the billing for the mowing services done by the County. Commissioner Kennedy moved to continue this matter to September 12, 1990, with Commissioner Kirby seconding the motion. It carried unanimously. CONSIDER COOPERATIVE REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN DISTRICT ATTORNEY AND SOCIAL SERVICES AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN: Dave Huffman, representing the Social Services Department, explained the Cooperative Reimbursement Agreeement. He also explained Item #12 under New Business, which is a Purchase of Services Agreement between Social Services and the District Attorney. Commissioner Kirby moved to approve both the Cooperative Reimbursement Agreement and the Purchase of Services Agreement and authorize the Chairman to sign both. The motion, seconded by Commissioner Kennedy, carried unanimously. CONSIDER PLOWING PERMIT AND ACCEPTANCE OF COLLATERAL AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN - FARLEY: Mr. Barker explained this plowing permit and recommended the Board approve it and accept the collateral. Commissioner Kirby moved to approve the plowing permit for Keith Farley, accept the collateral, and authorize the Chairman to sign. Commissioner Harbert seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. CONSIDER STREET GRADING AND SNOW REMOVAL AGREEMENT WITH TOWN OF FREDERICK AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN: Commissioner Kennedy moved to approve said Agreement and authorize the Chairmen to sign. Commissioner Harbert seconded the motion which carried unanimously. CONSIDER AMENDMENT TO LEASE WITH WELD LIBRARY DISTRICT AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN: Mr. Warden explained the Amendment to the Lease with the Weld Library District. Commissioner Kennedy moved to approve said Lease and authorize the Chairman to sign. Commissioner Kirby seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. CONSIDER MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY COOPERATIVE EXTENSION AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN: Mr. Warden explained the Memorandum of Understanding with Colorado State University Cooperative Extension. He said this Memorandum will make it easier for the Accounting Department. Commissioner Kennedy moved to approve said Memorandum and authorize the Chairman to sign. The motion, seconded by Commissioner Kirby, carried unanimously. CONSIDER CONTRACT WITH STATE DEPARTMENT or HEALTH FOR DIVISION OF EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES GRANTS PROGRAM AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN: Mr. Warden explained this Contract saying that it is to improve the current radio system. Commissioner Kennedy moved to approve said Contract and authorize the Chairman to sign. Commissioner Kirby seconded motion, and it carried unanimously. CONSIDER PURCHASE 07 Z:JMICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN SOCIAL SERVICES AND DISTRICT ATTORh.&Y AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN: This matter was approved wits Item #6 under New Business. CONSIDER RESOLUTION RE: RESCIND RESOLUTION CONCERNING ELECTRONIC MONITORING PROGRAM SERVICE: This matter was held over until the end of the meeting. Minutes - September S, 1990 Page 3 CONSIDER RESOLUTION RE: CONTRACT FOR ELECTRONIC MONITORING SERVICES AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN: This matter was held over until the end of the meeting. CONSIDER RESOLUTION RE: MODIFY LIST OF ARBITRATORS FOR PROPERTY ASSESSMENT APPEALS: Commissioner Kennedy moved to approve said Resolution, with Commissioner Kirby seconding the motion. It carried unanimously. CONSIDER RESOLUTIONS RE: TEMPORARY CLOSURE OF WCR 53 BETWEEN WCR 42 AND 44; WCR 18 BETWEEN WCR 73 AND 75;; WCR 17 BETWEEN U.S. HIGHWAY 34 AND WCR 60; AND WCR 84 BETWEEN WCR 21 AND 23: Commissioner Kirby moved to approve said Resolutions. Commissioner Kennedy seconded the motion which carried unanimously. PLANNING: CONSIDER RESOLUTION RE: VIOLATIONS OF THE ZONING AND BUILDING CODE ORDINANCES - McKINLEY; BOWEN; STEWART; LYONS; AND ROBERTON: Commissioner Kirby moved to approve this Resolution authorizing the County Attorney to proceed with legal action against Sharyl L. McKinley; Lois Bowen; James and Betty Stewart; Carl Lyons; and Sterling and Bonnie Roberton for violations of the Weld County Zoning and Building Code Ordinances. Commissioner Kennedy seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. CONSIDER DEMOLITION OF DANGEROUS BUILDING - HOWARD (CONT. FROM 8/15/90) : Brian Grubb, Planning Department representative, said the building has been demolished and the property is in compliance. Mr. Barker questioned whether there was any other information. Mr. Grubb said that Chuck Cunliffe, the Planning Department Director, told him that the property is now in compliance, and he read a letter confirming this fact into the record. Commissioner Kirby moved to dismiss the case concerning the property. Commissioner Kennedy seconded the motion which carried unanimously. CONSIDER ZPMH $1681 - MILLER/GOMEZ: Mr. Grubb read the Planning staff's recommendation for approval into the record. Gail Miller and Julian Gomez, applicants, were present and answered questions of the Board. Commissioner Kirby moved to approve ZPMH #1681, and Commissioner Kennedy seconded the motion. It carried unanimously. Let the record reflect that Items *13 and 814 under New Business were considered at this time. CONSIDER RESOLUTION RE: RESCIND RESOLUTION CONCERNING ELECTRONIC MONITORING PROGRAM SERVICE: After discussion with Jan Allison, Assistant County Attorney, Mr. Warden explained the reason for rescinding this Resolution. Commissioner Kirby moved to approve said Resolution. Commissioner Kennedy seconded the motion which carried unanimously. CONSIDER RESOLUTION RE: CONTRACT FOR ELECTRONIC MONITORING SERVICES AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN: Commissioner Kennedy moved to approve this Resolution and authorize the Chairman to sign the Contract for Electronic Monitoring Services. Commissioner Kirby seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES: The Resolutions were presented and signed as listed on the consent agenda. There were no Ordinances. Let the minutes reflect that the above and foregoing actions were attested to and respectfully submitted by the Acting Clerk to the Board. Minutes - September 5, 1990 Page 4 There being no further business, this meeting was adjourned at 9:40 A.M. APPROVED: ATTEST: � � A' BO OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS � Q'°� WE COLORADO Weld County Clerk to the-Board L�YI�Qws_ift r 1 Gene R. Brantner, Chairman Deputy Clerk to t Board e e Kennedy, Pro-Tem onstance L. Harbe C.W. Kirb _EXCUSED Gordon E. Lacy Minutes - September 5, 1990 Page 5 MEMORAIMUM � • /V�, • Commissioner Kirby August 31, 1990 To o.t. Dave A. Becker, Assistant Director, Road and Bridge ) 41;09 COLORADO From_ �/ !j Road & Bridge Report August 24 - August 30, 1990 Subject: TRUCKING Graveled the following Weld County Roads: Weld County Road 19 between Weld County Roads 38 and 44 Weld County Road 15 between Weld County Roads 2 and 12 Weld County Road 17 between Weld County Road 12 and Hwy 52 Weld County Road 12 between Weld County Roads 15 and 17 Weld County Road 16 between Weld County Roads 15 and 19 Weld County Road 17 between Weld County Road 26 and Hwy 66 Enchanted Hills Subdivision Weld County Road 28 between Weld County Roads 19 and 21 Graveled approximately 329.50 miles to date - 947. of 350 mile goal. Hauled 20 belly dump loads of gravel for road upgrade; 500 tons. Hauled 20 belly dump loads o£ gravel for washouts; 500 tons. Hauled 200 tandem loads and 98 end dump loads of asphalt for paving. Hauled 1 belly dump load of asphalt for bridge work. Hauled 11,000 tons of gravel. MINING Equipment Used: One dozer is working at the Peters Pit. One dozer is working at the Hall Pit. Two scrapers are working at the Hall Pit. The cone rock crusher is working at the Peters Pit. The screen is working at the Thomas Pit. Three dozers have been repaired and are ready for work. K i Commissioner Kirby Road & Bridge Report 08/24/90-08/30/90 Page 2 MINING (CONTINUED) Dirt Hauled for Reclamation Year-To-Date: Giesert Pit #2 - 54,390 yards Material Stockpiled (to be crushed) Year-To-Date: Giesert Pit #2 - 87,400 tons Pit Run Gravel Hauled to Building Site South of Fuel Site Year-To-Date: - 5,610 tons Overburden Removed Year-To-Date: Wilson Pit - 9,840 yards Overburden Removed Year-To-Date: Thomas Pit - 27,620 yards Overburden Removed Year-To-Date: Peters Pit - 8,340 yards Overburden Removed Year-To-Date: Hall Pit - 52,290 yards Material Crushed: Hokestra lit - 5,199 tons Giesert Pit - 152,238 tons Peters Pit - 71,555 tons Material Screened: Koenig Pit - 96,530 tons Thomas Pit - 89,540 tons TOTAL CRUSHED AND SCREENED YEAR-TO-DATE: 415,062 tons BRIDGE WCB 84/25A: Bridge Replacement - 100% complete WCB 84/218: Bridge Replacement - 5% complete 23rd Avenue at Poudre River: Repair Rock Dam - 100% complete WCR 10 at WCR 15: clean up dump site (loader and 3 trucks) - 100Z complete Commissioner Kirby Road & Bridge Report 08/24/90-08/30/90 Page 3 BRIDGE (CONTINUED) Tree Trimming: WCR 46 at WCR 47 WCR 45 at WCR 46 WCR 28 west of WCR 23 WCR 5 north of Hwy 119 "0" Street at WCR 41 WCB 122/85A Ditch Work: WCR 46 at WCR 47 - 1/10 mile WCR 46 west of WCR 43 - 1/2 mile, lower two culverts E. 18th Street at Hemlock - 1/10 mile WCR 50.5 at WCR 15.5 - 75' of 15" arch culvert Asphalt for Bridges: Bridge 84/25A: 66.00 Tons Year-To-Date Total: 478.00 Tons MAINTENANCE Routine maintenance. MAINTENANCE-SUPPORT Signing - 37 Striping - 61 Miles Cattle Guard Maintenance - 2 Gravel Hauling - 44 Tons Culvert Cleaning and Repair - 10 Miscellaneous - 4 . Commissioner Kirby Road & Bridge Report 08/24/90-08/30/90 Page 4 MAINTENANCE-SUPPORT (CONTINUED) Patching Totals Year-To-Date: Laydown Machine (Road and Bridge): 82,331.92 Tons Laydown Machine (Engineering): 1,421.99 Tons Hand Patch (Road and Bridge): 1,686.93 Tons Hand Patch (Engineering): 113.09 Tons Crushed Rock (Road and Bridge): 1,182.00 Tons Crushed Rock (Engineering): 156.00 Tons Cold Mix (Road and Bridge): 36.86 Tons Culvert Installations: WCR 55 between Hwy 52 and WCR 14 Size - 40' X 24" Round Culvert 100% Complete WCR 55 between Hwy 52 and WCR 14 Size - 40' X 24" Round Culvert 100% Complete WCR 4 between WCR 87 and WCR 91 Size - 40' X 30" Round Culvert 100% Complete WCR 18 between WCR 73 and WCR 75.5 Size - 40' X 18" Arch Culvert 50% Complete DAB mw:083090 cc: Commissioner Harbert George Goodell, Director Road & Bridge Report Pile Clerk to the Board T0: Don Warden, Finance Director August 22, 1990 FROM: Mark Johnson, RE: Sole-supplier Purchase Hearing Protection Safety System • We request that two additional headset systems be purchased for the first-line ambulances. The sole-supplier purchase of a trial system for one ambulance was based on the vendors experience with interface of dual-band radio systems. Use of the trial system has shown significant hearing p'roteCtion for our people and has reduced the confusion factor when responding to emergencies. The installation by Av-Tech Electronics has been precise and our service questions have been handled immediately. The cost for each unit should not exceed $2,630, total $5,260 for both ambulances. This cost is within our expectation and was budgeted for this year. Please advise Jan in Purchasing if we may proceed with sole-supplier purchase. Please give me a call if you have any questions about the system. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AGENDA Monday, September 10, 1990 Tape #90-32 ROLL CALL: Gene R. Brantner, Chairman ' George Kennedy, Pro-Tem Constance L. Harbert C.W. Kirby Gordon E. Lacy MINUTES: Approval of minutes of September 5, 1990 (Commissioner Lacy excused) ADDITIONS TO AGENDA: None APPROVAL or CONSENT AGENDA: COMMISSIONER COORDINATOR 1) Communication Services - Lacy REPORTS: 2) Engineering Services - Kirby 3) Health Services - Harbert 4) Planning Services - Kennedy 5) Purchasing & Personnel - Brantner COUNTY FINANCE OFFICER: 1) Warrants (Donald Warden) BUSINESS: NEW: 1) Consider Purchase of Services Agreement between Cheryl Divine and Employment Services and authorize Chairman to sign 2) Consider Resolution re: Declare certain equipment as surplus property 3) Consider Resolution re: Cancel uncollectible Ambulance accounts 4) Consider Resolution re: Cancel General Fund Warrants for August, 1990 _ 5) Consider Second Reading of Ordinance No. 77-C, In Matter of Repeal and Re-enactment with Amendments of Ordinance No. 77-B, Ambulance Services Rules and Regulations PLANNING: 1) Consider Resolution re: Building Code violations - Anderson; Slavin; Straight; and Richardson CONSENT AGENDA APPOINTMENTS: Sep 10 - Work Session 10:30 AM Sep 10 - Fair Board 7:30 PM Sep 10 - Weld Mental Health 7:30 PM Sep 11 - Juvenile Community Review Board 12:00 NOON Sep 12 - EDAP 7:00 AM Sep 14 - Community Corrections 12:00 NOON Sep 17 - Work Session 10:00 AM Sep 18 - E911 Telephone Authority Board 12:00 NOON Sep 18 - Retirement Board 2:15 PM Sep 18 - Airport Authority 3:00 PM Sep 20 - Placement Alternatives Commission 12:00 NOON HEARINGS: Sep 12 - Special Review Permit, Livestock confinement operation (1,500 cattle) , horse boarding and training facility (150 head) , and tack and feed store, Joy A. Jefferson (cont. from 8/29/90) 10:00 AM sep 12 - Change of Zone, PUD (Planned Unit Development) to A (Agricultural) , City of Longmont 10:00 AM Sep 12 - Change of Zone, A (Agricultural) and C-3 (Commercial) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) with C-3 and I-3 uses, Flatiron Structures/Azalea Farms 10:00 AM Sep 19 - Change of Ownership of Special Review Permit, Children's Shelter Home in A (Agricultural) Zone District, Chester Price 10:00 AM Sep 19 - Certificate of Designation, Sludge composting facility in the A (Agricultural) Zone District, City of Longmont 10:00 AM Sep 19 - Certificate of Designation, Roggen Disposal, Inc. 10:00 AM Oct 3 - Special Review Permit, Home business (plumbing shop) in the A (Agricultural) Zone District, George W., III, and Barbara J. Corman 10:00 AM Nov 7 - Show Cause Hearing, Richard Hessee (cont. from 8/29/90) 10:00 AM COMMUNICATIONS: 1) Planning Commission minutes of September 4, 1990 2) County Council minutes of August 1, 1990 3) Haiko Eichler re: Request for documents 4) State Department of Social Services re: Foster Care Review System 5) Nuclear Regulatory Commission - Federal Register, Vol. 55, No. 163 (Available in Clerk to the Board's Office) 6) State Department of Highways Newsletter 490-35 7) various Towns re: H.B. 90-1104 RESOLUTIONS: * 1) Approve continuance of protest concerning mowing services by Pest and Weed Department - Eichler * 2) Approve Cooperative Reimbursement Agreement between District Attorney and Social Services * 3) Approve Plowing Permit and accept collateral - Farley * 4) Approve Street Grading and Snow Removal Agreement with Town of Frederick * 5) Approve Amendment to Lease with weld Library District * 6) Approve Memorandum of Understanding with Colorado State University Cooperative Extension ■ 7) Approve Contract with State Department of Health for Division of Emergency Medical Services Grants Program * 8) Approve Purchase of Services Agreement between Social services and District Attorney * 9) Dismiss demolition of dangerous building - Howard * 10) Approve ZPMH 41681 - Miller/Gomez * 11) Approve declaring certain equipment as surplus property • 12) Approve cancellation of uncollectible Ambulance accounts * 13) Approve cancellation of General Fund Warrants for August, 1990 * 14) Authorize County Attorney to proceed with legal action - Building Code Violations ORDINANCE: 1) Second Reading of Ordinance No. 77-C, In Matter of Repeal and Re-enactment with Amendments of ordinance No. 77-B, Ambulance Services Rules and Regulations • Signed at this meeting Monday, September 10, 1990 RESOLUTION RE: APPROVE CONTINUANCE OF PROTEST CONCERNING MOWING SERVICES BY • PEST AND WEED DEPARTMENT - EICHLER WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board has been presented with protest from Haiko Eichler concerning mowing services done by the Weld County Pest and Weed Department, and ' WHEREAS, Mr. Eichler was not able to be present at the meeting of September 5, 1990; therefore, he requested, in writing, a continuance of said matter until September 12, 1990 , and WHEREAS, after consideration, the Board determined that the above mentioned protest be continued to September 12, 1990, at the regular Board meeting at 9:00 a.m. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners o£ Weld County, Colorado, that the protest from Haiko Eichler concerning mowing services done by the Weld County Pest and Weed Department be, and hereby is, continued to September 12, 1990, at 9:00 a.m. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 5th day of September, A.D. , 1990 . i BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST:kJ �'� v14GfiLfxti"! WELD UNTX, CO O Weld County Clerk to the Board Gene R. Brant er, C airman 1.:,64,_v_m)1e e Kenne ro-Tem C-.) BY: { !s / 999g Yr putt' Clerk to tBoard /,� y� APPROVED AS FORM: Constance L. Harbert 4d70"ce:;?�� C.W. Kirin �_ County Attorney EXCUSED Gordon E. Lacy 900802 Ekooia RESOLUTION RE: APPROVE COOPERATIVE REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT WITH COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board has been presented with a Cooperative Reimbursement Agreement with the Colorado Department of Social Services, and WHEREAS, said Agreement provides for reimbursement for the cost of the AFDC and Food Stamp Programs, and WHEREAS, the term of said Agreement is from July 1, 1990, through June 30, 1991 , with the further terms and conditions being as stated in the Agreements, and WHEREAS, after review, the Board deems it advisable to approve said Agreement, a copy being attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the Cooperative Reimbursement Agreement be, and hereby is, approved. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that the Chairman be, and hereby is, authorized to sign said Agreement. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 5th day of September, A.D. , 1990, nuns pro tune July 1, 1990. ��/n � '' BOARD F COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: �� WEL , COLORADO GYZ �(i U �'' C�iU�-�-'/T Weld County Clerk to the Board Sle- ene R. Brant r, hairman iii _ \://7714-7,74---( 0--) \ G1._� 2 �' Geo ge K nedi, Pro-Te— mm Deputy puty Clerk to a Board - APPROVED AS TO FORM: onsttance L. Har ert /e C.W. Kir�y / County Attorney EXCUSED Gordon E. Lacy 900806 .3.5C0 /'{- C-c_ • • STATE OF COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES c• t 575 Sherman Street „� , 'r Denver,Colorado 80203-1714 .I Phone 003) 666.5700 • 54; 19 November 9, 1990 *ion Roy Roy Romer Governor Irene M, !band Executive Director Eugene McKenna Weld County Department of Social Services P.O. Box A Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Mr. McKenna: Attached is your original copies of the Cooperative Reimbursement Agreement and Purchase of Services Agreement submitted for the AFDC/Food Stamp Fraud Activity Program recently approved by the Colorado Department of Social Services. We wish you luck in the operation of your program. Sincerely, an Baldwin, Director AFDC Fraud Control Program Office of Self-Sufficiency JB/tm • ' - COOPERATIVE REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT This Cooperative Reimbursement Agreement is made this 5th day of September , 1990 , between the State of Colorado, Department of Social Services (herein referred to as CSDSS) and the Weld County Board of Commissioners (hereinafter referred to as the County.) Whereas, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Family Support Agency (FSA) has provided authority for 75% reimbursement to states for costs of Food Stamps (FS) and Aid to Families With Dependent Children (AFDC) (hereinafter referred to as Program), investigation, administrative disqualifications hearing, prosecutions, and claim collections relating to intentional fraud; and Whereas, the parties desire to enter into an agreement enabling the County to participate in the 75% Reimbursement Program (hereinafter referred to as Reimbursement Program) for costs, and accordance with established CSDSS policy. Accordingly, The Parties Agree As Follows: 1. County agrees to participate in the Reimbursement Program in accordance with the federal law and regulations, including 7 C.F.R. Section 277.15, and applicable state statutes,including section 26-1-101 et. seq.,C.R.S. 1973 as amended, and regulations. 2. Services shall be provided in accordance with Exhibit I, entitled Scope of Services, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof by this reference. The parties to this Agreement will indicate the particular services to be covered by this Agreement. County shall not bill CDSS for and shall not be reimbursed for time involved in activities outside those identified in Exhibit I, unless prior written approval of CSDCC is obtained. 3. County shall identify all personnel by title who shall provide services under this Agreement by filling out Exhibit II, entitled Cooperative Reimbursement Agreement Personnel for AFDC/FS a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof by this reference. 4. This Agreement shall be in effect from July 1, 1990, through June 30, 1991-, but not to exceed twelve (12) months. This Agreement may be renewed by mutual consent, provided that each renewal shall be for a period not to exceed twelve (12) months. Said renewal shall contain appropriate amendments to Exhibit I, II, and III, if necessary. 5. County may enter into agreements with third parties (e.g. district attorneys, private attorneys, private investigation firms, collection agencies) to implement this Agreement. County shall use Purchase of Services Agreements which have been approved by CDSS to acquire all such services. Written approval of CSDSS shall be obtained on each , agreement but CSDSS shall not be a party thereto. Payment for third party services are the responsibility of the County. r , 6. CSDSS shall reimburse County 758 of all actual costs for investigation, administrative disqualification hearings (once the rules for administrative disqualification hearing are promulgated) prosecution, and establishment and collection of claims for intentional fraud involving the Program. 7. The 258 of costs not reimbursed by CSDSS shall be paid by the County. County may not use any of its required 208 share of general social services administrative costa to match or offset the 258 contribution required under this Reimbursement Program. No appropriation made for the operation of the county shall be reduced by reason of payments made under this agreement. 8. County shall submit monthly billings for actual costs incurred pursuant to this Agreement to CSDSS in accordance with the rules and regulations of the CSDSS. All other expenses must receive prior written approval by the CSDSS. 9. A form of report of invoice to be used by County to Facilitate the payment of reimbursement as provided in this Agreement will be provided by CSDSS. The CSDSS shall pay the County upon receipt of such billing as follows: (A) All direct charges for personnel costs (Exhibit II) must be determined by multiplying the number of hours worked by the individual (s) to provide services under this Agreement by their actual hourly rates including employee benefits. All direct charges must be supported by time sheets or records. (1) . For investigation function, only employees whose title is "Investigator" or a similar descriptive title shall be eligible for the increased funding. (2). Costs relating to the establishment and collection of claims when performed by investigators or prosecutors or by any separate unit having claims establishment and collection as its primary function shall be eligible for the increased funding. (8) Operating expenses are determined by an allocation method dietributing costs pro-rata to all activities. Operating expenses include supplies, materials, equipment, printing, reproduction, rent, normal telephone charges, utilities, repairs and maintenance. (2) (1) Equipment Purchased with Federal, State and County Money Equipment with an acquisition cost of lees than $300 may be purchased pursuant to this agreement. Equipment with an acquisition cost of $300 or more may be purchased upon written approval by the State Department and shall be capitalized and depreciated over the useful service life of the equipment. (C) Direct charges for travel related to providing services under this Agreement. All expenditures for out-of-state travel for which reimbursement is requested must receive prior written approval of CSDSS. (D) Direct charges for reasonable and essential short term training for staff providing services under the Agreement. All training for which reimbursement is requested must receive prior written approval of CSDSS. (E) Specific direct charges for other costs related to providing services under the Agreement including filing fees, long distance telephone calls, polygraph tests, expert witness foes, and transcripts. (F) All other expenses must receive prior written approval by CSDSS. 10. County will submit a proposed budget in accordance with Exhibit III Cooperative Reimbursement Agreement Budget, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Costs exceeding the projected budget will not be reimbursed unless CSDSS has approved and this Agreement has been modified in writing. 11. Reimbursement of costs incurred pursuant to this Agreement is expressly contingent upon the availability of federal funds. 12. The County shall maintain such records as deemed necessary pursuant to the CSDSS rules to assure a proper accounting for all costs and funds collected. These records will be made available for audit purposes to the Family Support Administration, the CSDSS or and authorized representative of the State of Colorado, and will be retained for three (3) years after the expiration of this Agreement unless permission to destroy them is granted by the CSDSS. The County shall make financial, program progress and other reports as requested by the CSDSS. 13. The CSDSS shall provide the County with all pertinent information available to the extent that such information is relevant to the services to be preformed pursuant to this Agreement. Information provided by the CSDSS in furtherance of the aims and purposes of this Agreement shall be used only for the purpose intended and in accordance with federal and state laws and regulations. The County shall provide for the security of information collected pursuant to this Agreement as provided in the rules and regulations of the CSDSS. (3) P , •i 14. No subcontract shall be made by the county with any other party for furnishing any services contracted for without the prior written consent of the CSDSS. For services provided under any subcontract, the County shall be responsible for performance and compliance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 15. The parties to this Agreement agree to provide all reasonable and necessary information required to assess the effectiveness and appropriateness of this Agreement. For the food stamp program a formula to be utilized for this assessment is contained in Exhibit IV attached hereto and incorporated herein. Failure to meet the performance standard may result in the denial of further reimbursement. 16. County shall permit the State and the Family Support Administration any other duly authorized agent or governmental agency, to monitor all activities conducted by the County pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. As the monitoring agency may in its sole discretion deem necessary or appropriate, examination of program data, special analyses, on-site checking, formal audit examinations, or any other reasonable procedures. All such monitoring shall be performed in a manner that will not unduly interfere with Agreement work. 17. The parties to this Agreement agree to amend it to conform with changes in state and federal laws and regulations. 18. All alterations, modifications, or waivers of the provisions of this Agreement shall be valid only when they have been reduced to writing and duly signed. 19. Either party shall have the right to terminate this Agreement by giving the other party thirty (30) days notice by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested. If notice is so given, this Agreement shall terminate on the expiration of the thirty days, and the liability or the parties hereunder for further performance of the terms of this Agreement shall thereupon cease, but the parties shall not be released from the duty to perform their obligations up to the date of termination. 20. This Cooperative Agreement contains all the terms and conditions agreed upon by the parties, and no other agreement regarding the subject matter of this Agreement shall be deemed to exist or to bin either of the parties hereto. 4 AY�J� 1,47.4 t 9/5/90 Irene Ibarrar 'Date 000 114/qan, Board Date Executive Director County Commissioners Colorado State Department of social Services y� ‘ / 3/225 D ector, Count Da �/2 Date Den of So ia Se ices (4) We ou ATTEST: it t l t�� Y er Board By: Deputy C rk to the Board EXHIBIT. I SCOPE OF SERVICES FOR FS/AFDC FRAUD CONTROL I. Pre-approval Investigation: Workers must have the title of Investigator or similar title. Other titles must be justified and approved as an exception. (X) A. Perform upfront investigation of eligibility factors. (X) B. Verify clients eligibility within processing standards. (X) C. Referral of findings to eligibility worker for determination of eligibility. II. Post-Investigations: Workers must have the title of Investigator or similar title. Other titles must be justified and approved as an exception. (X) A. Conduct in their entirety, investigations of suspected intentional fraud affecting AFDC Program administered by the county. (X) B. Taking of formal, written statements of witnesses and suspects involved in a fraud case. (X) C. Preparation of final report investigation for presentation to District Attorney for prosecution and/or Administrative Hearing Officer. III. Administrative Fraud Hearing (once regulations are promulgated) (X) A. Establish appropriate referral system for cases to be scheduled for Administrative Fraud Hearing at the state level. (X) B. Conduct Administrative Frau Hearing in accordance with State and Federal Regulations. IV. Prosecutions - District Attorney (X) A. Establish criteria for referral of FS/AFDC fraud eases to District Attorney. (X) B. Prosecute FS/AFDC fraud cases under appropriate state statute, C.R.S. 26-2-127, 1973, as amended, or other criminal/ civil statute, (includes pre-trial, trial, and post-trial, prosecutorial functions) . V. Claims Unit (X) A. Establishment of claims determined from investigation, prosecutions and/or administrative fraud hearing. (X) B. Collection of claims. ( ) C. Reporting of claims activities. (5) EXHIBIT II COOPERATIVE REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT PERSONNEL FOR FS/AFDC FRAUD CONTROL A. Instructions: Supervisor: List the name and official title of the person who will set personnel policies, appoint new employees and will otherwise exercise supervisory authority for services to be provided under this agreement. Also, include his/her actual hourly rate including employee benefits, the estimated number of his/her hours to be charged under this agreement. SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR ACTUAL HOURLY ESTIMATED ESTIMATED NAME TITLE RATE HOURS COST Dave Huffman Supv of In- $18.12 AFDC 913 $16,543.50 37.50% vestigations FS 37.50% Total 1,826 S33,087.00 88% B. Instructions: Personnel: List the name and official title of all personnel who will be providing services under this agreement. Also, include his/her actual hourly rate including employee benefits, the estimated number of his/her hours to be charged under this agreement, and estimated cost. EMPLOYEE PERCENT ACTUAL HOURLX ESTIMATED ESTIMATED TITLE OF TIME RATE HOURS COST Dave Lawley 50% $14.76 AFDC 1,040 $15,350.00 Investigator II 50% FS Total 2,080 30,700.00 Robert French 50% 11.01 AFDC 1,040 $11,450.00 Investigator I 50% FS " Total 2,080 $22,900.00 Mary Buckley 50% 7.09 AFDC 1,040 $ 7,374.00 Recovery Agent II 50% FS 1.037 7,;56.00 2,077 $14,730.00 Total Personnel Costs $101,417.00 (Transfer to Exhibit III, Item 1) (6) - iy EXHIBIT II COOPERATIVE REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT PERSONNEL FOR FS/AFDC FRAUD CONTROL A. Instructions: Supervisor: List the name and official title of the person who will set personnel policies, appoint new employees and will otherwise exercise supervisory authority for services to be provided under this agreement. Also, include his/her actual hourly rate including employee benefits, the estimated number of his/her hours to be charged under this agreement. SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR ACTUAL HOURLY ESTIMATED ESTIMATED NAME TITLE RATE HOURS COST Dave Huffman Supv of In- S18.12 AFDC 913 $16,543.50 37.50% vestigatione FS 37.50% Total 1,826 $33,087.00 88% 8. Instructions: Personnel: List the name and official title of all personnel who will be providing services under this agreement. Also, include his/her actual hourly rate including employee benefits, the estimated number of his/her hours to be charged under this agreement, and estimated cost. EMPLOYEE PERCENT ACTUAL HOURLY ESTIMATED ESTIMATED TITLE OF TIME RATE HOURS COST Dave Lawley 50% $14.76 AFDC 1,040 $15,350.00 Investigator II 50% FS " Total 2,080 30,700.00 Robert French 50% 11.01 AFDC 1,040 $11,450.00 • Investigator I 50% FS " Total 2,080 $22,900.00 Mary Buckley 50% 7.09 AFDC 1,040 $ 7,374.00 Recovery Agent II 50% FS 1.Q37 7.356.00 2,077 S14,73O.00 Total Personnel Costs S101,417.00 (Transfer to Exhibit III, Item 1) (6) 1 EXHIBIT III COOPRATIVE REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT BUDGET FOR FS/AFDC FRAUD CONTROL FOR PERIOD OF July 1, 1990 TmoucH June 30, 1991. 1. Total annual personnel coats including employee benefits. (From Exhibit I1) $101,417.00 2. Operating costs (rent, utilities, telephone, supplies, etc. itemize) S 3. Travel (itemize by purpose) $ 7,000.00 4. Training Costs (itemize) Fraud Conference May 1991 $ 500.00 5. Specific Direct Cost (itemize) Purchase of Services Contract with District Attorney $ 1,879.00 6. Other expense (itemize) Personal computer and printer (see letter) $ 4,918.00 TOTAL COST $115,714.00 EXHIBIT IV Performance Standard for 75 Percent Fraud Funding Funding < Recoupment + Cost Avoidance + Deterrence o Fraud Claims Disqualifications o Upheld fraud Collected from prosecutions hearing x $300 o Non-fraud and fraud hearings o Prosecutions claims collected x 6 x average x $1000 per person ($43) The above total must be greater than the amount of funding received by the County if the County is to continue to qualify for enhance funding. Examples Funds Cost Total County Recd Recoupment + Avoidance + Deterrence o Effectiveness x S115,714.00 $48,151.00 $79,560.00 $37,500.00 $165,211.00 (8) (r DE . .RTMENT OR SOCIAL SERVICES PA eox A GREELEY.COLORADO 00632 Administration and Public Assistance(303)352.1551 torte'&moon(3 03)3524933 Gild Protection and Day Cara(303)332.1923 Food Stamps(303)3553630 : z. 4 ■■■ µ. .. COLORADO • • August 6, 1990 Joan Baldwin AFDC Administrative Office Colorado Department o£ Social Services 1575 Sherman Street Denver, CO 80203-1714 RE: Request for Authorization to Purchase Personal Computer and Printer Dear Joan: • As part of 1990-91 combined contract for Food Stamp and Fraud Investigations, • Weld County would like to purchase a personal computer and a printer. This PC would be used exclusively by the Investigations staff and physically stationed in our work area. There would be an increase in productivity as this would allow us to move from a manual master card system to an automated system. In addition, we would keep track o£ productivity levels and statistics on the PC. Our County Computer Service has prepared an itemized price list (attached) . The cost o£ the PC and printer would be approximately $5,000. Weld County has its 25 percent share in its budget. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Sincerely yours, Dave Huffman Supervisor of Investigations Gene McKenna County Director Attachments: 1 Q""�i�o�r+ 1. • • -4.al(de k;g° illErileRAnDUal//. '9ee 1311q • i paave Huffman, O6\• \z • ill e T9ocinl Servioos-Invectigat.ion& — . • 9A Darrell Wissel, Team Leader, COLORADO Fromm o SUbi•Cteonr .5"."'—ron 2"4 COer for 2. pArsAnal rnmpntor Ane print-p.m _ In order to estimate the purchase price for the equipment that you requested, I have configured the personal computer equally functional to the one presently located in the Investigations area. It too is attached to the Social Services token ring network. More precisely, the following configuration would give you exactly the same sec up that Tony presently has in his office. Also, the printer is equivalent to the one that your staff is printing on in the Business Office. It has also been configured to be attached to the token ring network in order to meet the future printing needs on the second floor. Please call me if you have any questions. 1 PS/2 Model 25 PC with Monochrome display, 640K memory . $ 907 • 1 Token Ring Adapter 455 1 Type 3 Media Filter 39 1 Type 3 Media Jumper 18 1 3270 Emulation Short Adapter 406 1 IBM Laser Printer Model 4019-E01 1,076 1 AMS LPT2-1.273 Board 150 1 Long Link Printer Cable 119 Hardware Subtotal $3,170 1 LAN Program • $ 132 1 LAN Support Program 28 1 3270 Emulation Program 259 1 DOS 4.1 Program 104 1 PS/PC version 1.3 Program 219 1 Lotus 123 version 2.2 338 1 Wordperfect version 5.0 239 1 Dbase III Plus 429 Software Subtotal $1,748 Total Purchase Price tor Investigations PC and Printer $4,918 Gene McKenna Director Weld County tY Social Services Donn Ruby, Director, Weld County Information Services v4 to f)6 RESOLUTION RE: APPROVE PLOWING PERMIT NO. 90-6, ACCEPT COLLATERAL, AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN - KEITH FARLEY WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and M O WHEREAS, Keith Farley desires to obtain a Plowing Permit to c cultivate certain grassland described as part of Section 11, No Township 1 North, Range 58 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, u Colorado, and a a ow O 3 WHEREAS, pursuant to Ordinance #108-A, Keith Farley has o a submitted proof o£ collateral in the form of Letter of Credit #61, "afrom American National Bank, Kimball, Nebraska, in the amount of O $1,000.00, although the required sum was only $486.00, and all V other pertinent documents necessary for the issuance of a Plowing ✓ a� Permit, and .. .. b H gal g WHEREAS, required permit fees were waived by the Board of o a County Commissioners, and cr, v n z w WHEREAS, the Board deems it appropriate to approve the c ti issuance of a Plowing Permit to Keith Farley for those grasslands a described in the approved Soil Conservation Plan, a copy of which 11; is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. r N• W �„ w N Z NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County N a Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that Plowing Permit No. a 90-6 be, and hereby is, issued to Keith Farley. N M BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that the Chairman be, and N N hereby is, authorized to sign said Plowing Permit. NN 07 cw 900813 y Page 2 RE: PLOWING PERMIT #90-6 - FARLEY The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 5th day of September, A.D. , 1[1990. nl �.,�� BOA OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: ,��/ �/U'C�iLex--7/ WE LINTY, COLORADO Weld County Clerk to the Board e e R. Br n ner, Chairman BY: ern(-44-c c _ -a74,7,( ate' Ge ge Kennedy, Pro-Tem Dputy Clerk to he Board APPROVED AS FORM: Constance L. ber • C.W. irby County Attorney EXCUSED c O Gordon E. Lacy O M• O V G a om o oa h 67 0 V W r. cc N .. y .ti N g w oa rn V Lelx N M \ p0 a+ E O ra a w � Ca C-% Ca N W O N Z N Z N 4 O WW N 0L M1 4 I', 0 � r-I 900813 ma ORDINANCE NO. 108-A PERMIT NO. 90-6 PERMIT FOR PLOWING GRASSLAND APPLICANT NAME: keith Farley ADDRESS: 66000 WCR 134 New Rayner, CO 80742 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF GRASSLAND(S) TO BE CULTIVATED; Part of Section 1, Township 11 North, Range 56 Went of the 6th P.M„ Weld County, Colorado ' 1 ATTACH FOLLOWING: APPROVED SOIL CONSERVATION PLAN, ALL MAPS AS REQUIRED BY ORDINANCE 108-A, AND PROOF OF OWNERSHIP OF GRASSLAND (S) OR, IF LEASED, PROOF OF AUTHORITY TO CULTIVATE. PERMIT FEE: $240.00 for the first 100 acres = $4140)00,0 w ived fee❑ 10 per acre thereafter = 8/2Q/90 , Total = COLLATERAL: (Must be in the sum of $30.00 per acre. ) Approved by o v the Board in the sum of $ 46.00 O ri p PERMIT AND COLLATERAL APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY V COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY, COLORADO ON THE L", DAY OF a s. ncc• Ser , laal6); 149. ow Landowner or Lessee as aw EBy: a+ /! r r ?�c�j a`/✓' 7!/ 1 � . � v / r Chairman a DATE: j,Y ; Y !'%/ amvse/ Areaitez4 ATTEST: / // Weld County C:leasaFAdxA4d0.x o a and Clerk to the Board t Z V �z _ SEAL B (41"'4 ` d yl OYa sa o vHi Deputy C e co tae aoard a w � o N w This Permit is issued pursuant to Ordinance No. 108-A adopted by o the Weld County Board of County Commissioners on March II, 1986, N x and requiring the issuance of permits ,for the plowout and c cultivation of ....grassland (s) . Pursuant to said Ordinance, the U a Permittee is required to follow a conservation plan approved by m the local Conversation District Board, must pay all applicable a z fees pursuant to Ordinance 142, and must submit collateral in an N amount as set by Ordinance 142. Said collateral must be approved N N by the Board prior to the issuance of this Permit. ` ~ B 1278 REC 02229666 10/10/90 11:29 ra a. �' 40.00 1/001 F 1908 MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK & RECORDER WELD CO, CO ELIREOMIED COPv i Rev 4/1/86 ' to cc/ ‘ OFFICE OF COUNTY ATTORNEY • PHONE(303)35&4O00 EXT.4391 . P.O.BOX 1948 lGREELEYY.COLORADO 80632 COLORADO August 20, 1990 Keith Farley 66000 WCR 134 New Rayner, CO 80742 RE: Plowing Permit Dear Mr. Farley: This letter is in response to your letter dated July 10, 1990, requesting a reduction in the flat $240.00 fee for a Plowing Permit from Weld County, Colorado. The Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, has decided to grant your request. You will not be charged the $240. 00 fee for the permit. You will still be required, however, to provide the collateral at $30.00 per acre. It appears from your file, that you have done so in the form of a letter of credit from American National Bank in Kimble, Nebraska. The Board of County Commissioners will process your application immediately. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, f - Bruce T. Barker Assistant Weld County Attorney BTB:rm WEST GREELEY SOIL CONSERVATION DISTRICT 4302 WEST 9TH STREET ROAD GREELEY, COLORADO 80634 (303) 356-6506 • August 15, 1990 Bruce T. Barker Assistant Weld Co. Atty. P.O. Box 1948 Greeley, CO 80632 Subject: Keith Farley Plowing Permit Fee Waiver Dear Mr. Barker: At their Aug. I3 board meeting, the West Greeley SCD board of supervisors discussed your Zetter dated 8/2/90 on whether the SCD would waive the $240 permit foe for Keith Farley . Since Mr. Farley is plowing the 16.2 acre strip for conservation tillage efficiency reasons, the board unanimously approved to waive the permit fee. Sincerely, e. � Kathleen E. Petersen District Manager mc: Ronald D. Miller, SCS Greeley FO t OFFICE OF COUNTY ATTORNEY PHONE(303)358.4000 EXT.4391 P,0.BOX 1948 GREELEY,COLORADO 80632 Nue COLORADO August 2, 1990 Dean Severin, President west Greeley Soil Conservation District 4302 West 9th Street Road Greeley, CO 80634 RE: Plowing Permit for Keith Farley Dear Mr. Severin: Enclosed please find a copy of a letter dated July 10, 1990, from Keith Farley and addressed to the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County. Mr. Farley is requesting a reduction in the flat $240.00 fee for plowing permit. He obtained a Conservation Plan from the SCS Greeley Field Office on June 18, 1990. Mr. Farley wishes to plow a narrow strip of ground totalling 16.2 acres. Re argues that the plowing of this property will be for conservation and tillage efficiency reasons. The Board of County Commissioners is inclined to waive Mr. Farley' s $240.00 fee, only if the west Greeley Soil Conservation District agrees to the waiver. As you may recall, Weld County Ordinance 142 requires that $100.00 of the $240.00 fee be paid to the District. The Board of County Commissioners believes that it is important to obtain the District's agreement to the waiver. Please let me know as soon as possible if the west Greeley Soil Conservation District aarees to the waiver of the $240.00 fee. You may either call me at 356-4000, extension 4391 , or write to me at P. O. Box 1948 , Greeley, CO 80632. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Sincerely, l �J I ( uce T. Barker Assistant Weld County Attorney ATB:rm sc: Ron Miller r ,r7r Sir ^_a.3 r r‘%•MEMI flak C=MIr a 1031 Mme.• / 207 SOUTH CHESTNUT•P.O.BOX 070•KIMBALL,NEBRASKA a071.5 PHONE(000)290-300 FROM: American National Bank P.O. BOx 670 Kimball, NE 69145 T0: Weld County Board of Commissioners Greeley, CO RE: Letter of Credit, Keith Farley Letter o£ Credit #61 Expiration Date: OCTOBER 5, 1990 Dear Sirs: This letter is to notify you that the American National Bank of Kimball has established a Letter of Credit in your favor in an amount not to exceed $1,000.00, for the account of Keith Farley. This Letter of Credit applies specifically to the application being submitted for a Conservation Plan Plow Permit. All drafts or personal checks drawn on this Letter of Credit should be marked. "Drawn on the American National Bank Letter of Credit #61", dated July 7, 1990. Dated: July 7, 1990 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK /dui d.. reac C. Ron Bertucci, President July 10,1990 FROM: Keith Farley T0: Weld County Board of Commissioners Greeley, Colorado RE: Reduction of Permit Fee Dear Sirs: This is a request for a reduction in the flat $240.00 fee. With a maximum of 16.2 acres involved, my intention is to improve wind erosion control and tillage efficiency rather than breaking out additional land. Sincerely, " �� Keith Far ey 66000 WCR 134 New Rayner, Colora o 80742 ,4 t, 180-040 4-61 SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION PLAN • Cooperator fireP (e CONSERVATION DISTRICT Audited by UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE 900813 , - . SCS Greeley Field Office ,! Page /_ of S (Rev_ 6/90) CONSERVATION PLAN FOR PLOW PERMIT . Name: K6 .. .Ell F'a r fry -- ------- _ Total Acres in Plan _,C. 2 , Highly Erodible Land (HEL) Acres _i(42_4„,_ **************+rar:rirar*a►********* I (we) concur with the conservation practices and installation schedules for all fields indicated in this conservation plan, and understand that when the conservation system is applied to the land and maintained, it will meet the requirement of Weld County Ordinance No. 103/I0SA and 1985 Food Security Act for conservation compliance. LANDOWNERS SIGNATURE .ca ru„- -------_ Date 4‘-‘ v-5:3" --- Date ----_ --- � Date _-_----- Date ---- LAND OPERATORS ,-J _ SIGNATURE - _ Date 4— si 7a ***********************t****** USDA-SCS TECHNICAL ADEQUACY CERTIFICATION I certify that this conservation plan meets the requirements of Section II of the FIELD OFFICE TECHNICAL GUIDE. • _ Date 6 -Ar-9e SCS District Conservationist Greeley Field Office / / Planning Assistance Received from . ZVI _0 / G/pp (sig a � Date ****************************** I WEST GREELEY SOIL CONSERVATION DISTRICT CERTIFICATION This cc.nserrvvaattiionn plan was approved by the Hoard of Supervisors. Date __IN DI m West Greeley SCD Board Member •l Fehr. "•'! ion. Y � q�' i. 44,Fi r Y +/r - •. r `ilJ}.f y' ••? ! .`.�.�/ • 41 S�a e 'y ff +Yf malt ! �I If 1 I�• /(1 1� , f L+1/''t ,+•� • t,. tr�f' „/r ,+AP *t�, F l; "y , t 'y i` � �y�sr irt}t4 I, '',; �11�'I! rm � � !'+ > y IP, ' `- 1 t r 1t -1,. 'x, I ! I. ' • 1 \ 0! / d#41.1A \. • 4�l. i ,yaR "�a' r� ^I �,( o.,-; � u . 1.. +.. p•' - -,�/[ fti . • wlrI . • "Yr,�' t �� r •n°��I _I il 1. ,.,G ?�y r • Tq: c w�SOS �:t i r:.4YeM\•r. r M C /..•\•; ,,.../. r. r• ,n,'!�•. r Kt e Y yxt Q4l4 tiyl�r •�i /rA :�VMPWt•'^" J .w1�.. ' 4r`. �,,♦7Lr�� N,O,h JI.�N' /�•A tr ♦ 'f^• 1 lli 1 4 ..� . �, • ,l }^.•1010•;•"S''• "�w.ii1.ft \ .Ir l a rt� 4 x ,+{r•' �a. by z9 l I\ IG.C 1 m sM n�� '�w; rI/ $ • ": . ..r,1 •� Y T.."j— .Y_-.0X1}111,^0 •-q1• 1� + - 'C , / I'2r.•t,.. 'NW �'(N lfl a`1 fir. ,r�. 2w r'l , .t +, L l R .. ' . 'Ili N1., --4%hryF.aI.' - �.+1• It.; }. }�, w I�dI1 ',4. Ili C � •4.. I f J '�o�r- r a\ . _,.11��+��c� v • ��1 +t 11 r N. I p•.ryy,, • .r/1! a. b` v _i�,•! ,\r iiN,� (•/ iL•' \�"4- • 1 I. t' t.� � ..1.. lei `. .c\'rp •�� .c}- r � 1 a"n 4 f is.� `` w • 77.• +•• �V+A- a a. •_+r�rQLFr ',teri 11 /D•3 y " /4'3 , • J /��a er_... •Y p,v •• • loo � 1. ' 7•`. 1 I tIlf . t : .., V.S.DEPARTMENT or AGRICULTURE •Trbvt 60 a 8 E ,Z / — II —6-3 ' SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE SCS•CPA.16 I f•at} Goa W a- 1 - 11 -58 CONSERVATION PLAN NAP .111 Owner Ke t ill 1'a.r ley Operator S4 n g- County weld _ State L°lo Date 47, 1 Approximate acres /4. . d .I.r, y y� ' • ' Cooperating with We Approximate scale = /sin., 7n,"' ,'•' G re e 1 rry S v:1 Conservation District [: h Plan identification FA �h1+ Y'7YJ Flow eIA". Photo number no. - 3 t;.;.:.1 "° , Assisted b ,�,• I�n•Fi y —�• ,� rYl ° `^�e r" USDA Soil Conservation Service ��_„ • ---- -- . _ -----. -- . . .. ._ .....___ ._..____. __j.____ Ga)/ / / / Ao2V / / /,,,, / / / /�,� Z . --. /."/ L.,, v , Z ...„,Z Z 7 \ / , V Z / / / / i / / 7 / i % i 7 • liie. 4.4v4e. mo_r 3ltol..In -Hie. ciiaJo�a/ sfr:ps MI 63 w: ll lie e +aLI:skcU ohQC the. plow w :"�per � i5 do4-ek:.. aJ cor c: elci .7R }i, tead- 662. 9 a .%.d c; e/1e1 ;A :, trac.1 64,13 . Mt advt.-J-4-7e_ %h So ; / sc..v ; ngs o. 330 ' id; 4.30..af w:n.dsfr:p over ate_ Cu "c••• + e‘.5 4- eJe5f 54r :es o.. -the_ noel& ref/off.' 'traa (0 t 029 c,..4 a1( o `V -I r4 c.4 602$ Go: a 0ICf- t.JCfy4 city ac( acrs c -s eCAee. • oc• s49btis4-; .,A �;�Ids 24 a..9. s4 , 1 E4.r ea "to bC p/ ow ecl 044.4' U.S.DEPARTMENT Or AGRICULTURE 7- G p.L S E U. / e l 1 - S a SCS•CPA.,• SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE ^1 6 0 .3 W 1 I - t t S-$ 2.-II CONSERVATION PLAN MAP Owner k t ; 46 FA e I r y Operator 5.4 rk e County We / d f State Co t o Date Sp VP 0 Approximate acres /6• Approximate scale 8 a = ./ -..: Cooperating with Wes f i- c e rey S 01 1 Conservation,District Id Plan identification FR."..r` 471/4 Plow Ns. Photo number QiCI ^ 1.,3 tAssisted by R a 7 rh e., d M o,•a e. ,f USDA Soil Conservation Service • cpa68.doc(HAL) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE GREELEY FIELD OFFICE Page 2 of 5~ RECORD OF COOPERATOR'S DECISIONS AND PROGRESS IN APPLICATION OPERATOR: Keith Farley OWNER: Keith Farley FARM NO. : 4741 TRACT NO. : (0028 ASSISTED BY: Raymond Mowery =========ems======a=====--__======== =====e= ==eee= - PLANNED : APPLIED : Basic Conservation System :FIELD : Non-Irrigated Cropland :NUMBER : Amount Yr. : Amount M/Yr. : 2A : 7 3 A o 1991 : :BCS 06 - Basic Conservation System : ;Winter wheat is drilled in the fall be-: : : tween Sept. 10 and Sept_ 25_ Drilling : : :of the grain is usually done by hoe or : . :chisel type drills creating a rough . : : ; surface. Tillage operations are come , : :posed of using a chisel or sweeps in : :the fall and subsurface implements in . :the spring and summer. As needed to . • : control weeds to conserve moisture and : : prevent seed maturity. Tillage passes : : ; : should be 6 or less excluding the : : : :drilling. *Moldboard plowing may be : :used for a maximum of two consecutive : : :fallow periods, only when necessary for: : : :Jointed goat grass control . Herbicides: : :may be used in place of plowing. . : r* ?lew:ns si+e"►d be l:m:fed t. zVest :n Z. : 2A : 7: 344c. 1991 : :328 - Conservation Cropping Sequence : . : :50X growing winter wheat and 50X summer: : :fallow_ : . : 2A : 7! 34e, 1991 : :344 - Crop Residue Use : : :During the critical wind erosion period: : : (Nov - May) a minimum of 1700 lbs. of : . . :crop residue CSgE7 is required to be : ; left on the soil surface. To get the . . : :required SGE residue there needs to be : :900 lbs. of actual wheat residue on the: : : : surface after planting_ : . ; A,/ t . . Ye.4/S Whe.. p/0w:nl .s kree9 "g akde . , . 1 e en , . he Fta :h . b . ; : : SEE TOTAL AC. AND HIGHLY ERODIBLE LAND : (HEL) AC. ON NEXT PAGE. =x=aa==s===============s a=======v=========ae========_=s=== * Field(s) designated "not highly erodible land (NHEL)". The application and maintenance of this conservation practice is not required for compliance with the Food Security Act of 1985. =====masse==============s====e=v ==ass===a=a===ra========s=========e=a .cpa68.doc(HAL) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE , GREELEY FIELD OFFICE Page i of r RECORD OF COOPERATOR'S DECISIONS AND PROGRESS IN APPLICATION OPERATOR: Keith Farley OWNER: Keith Farley FARM NO. : 4741 TRACT NO. : 6038 ASSISTED DV: Raymond Mowery PLANNED APPLIED : Basic Conservation System :FIELD : Non-Irrigated Cropland :NUMBER : Amount Yr. : Amount M/Yr. : ZA ; 7', 7j Ac 1991 : :589 _ StriDCroDDinq. Wind . : :Strips perpendicular to the prevailing : :wind will be maintained or established : : :no wider than 330' or 20 rods. These :strips alternate with winter wheat and : . : fallow stubble. . . . . . . . , . , . • . . , • . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . .: : . , . : . : a . . : • . . . . . . • . , , . . , . , , . . , . . . . . ; • . . . s . . • : s I I . . , . 4 s . . : TOTAL AC. THIS PAGE 7.0 _ : HIGHLY ERODIBLE LAND (HEL) AC. SI _ sses=snmmca=s=ca=n=ns===mane at Fie '.d(s) designated "not highly erodible laid (NHEL)". The application and maintenance of this conservation practice is not required for compliance with the Food Security Act of 1985. cpa68.doc(HAL) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE GREELEY FIELD OFFICE Page Y of S RECORD OF COOPERATOR'S DECISIONS AND PROGRESS IN APPLICATION OPERATOR: Keith Farley OWNER: Keith Farley FARM NO. : 4741 TRACT NO. : 4p;9 ASSISTED BY: Raymond Mowery PLANNED APPLIED : Basic Conservation System :FIELD : : : Non-Irrigated Cropland :NUMBER : Amount Yr. : Amount M/Yr. : : 2A : $ .94` 1991 : :DVS 06 - Basic Conservation System ' :Winter wheat is drilled in the fall be-: . :tween Sept. 10 and Sept. 25. Drilling : : : :of the grain is usually done by hoe or : :chisel type drills creating a rough :surface. Tillage operations are com- : : :posed of using a chisel or sweeps in : • :the fall and subsurface implements in . • :the spring and summer. As needed to : . :control weeds to conserve moisture and : . :prevent seed maturity. Tillage passes : :should be b or less excluding the . : :driIIing. *Moldboard plowing may be . : :used for a maximum of two consecutive : : :fallow periods, only when necessary for: : :Jointed goat grass control . Herbicides: . : :may be used in place of plowing. : : l* P/.....;.1 sh.r1.1 be I:m4iwJ to a yMeP :•1 Z . 2A : 2. 9A c. 1991 : :328 - Conservation Cropping Sequence . :50X. growing winter wheat and 50X summer: . : fallow. . . • • : 2A • e yedic 1991 . :344 - Crop Residue Use : :During the critical wind erosion period: : : (Nov - May) a minimum of 1700 lbs. of : : :trop residue CSgE7 is required to be : : left on the soil surface. To get the : • :required SGE residue there needs to be : :900 lbs. of actual wheat residue on the: : surface after planting. n . • : Dur:..g 7emIC WAe.,. pew:el , s used : ; +kr a6v. e ees :c/� e .) ; 1/ riot be • : • . , w H«:A.41e elm. . : SEE TOTAL AC. AND HIGHLY ERODIBLE LAND • : : (HEL) AC. ON NEXT PAGE. * Field(s) designated "not highly erodible land (NHEL)'. The application and maintenance of this conservation practice is not required for compliance with the Food Security Act of 1985. .L • .cpa68.doc(HAL) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE GREELEY FIELD OFFICE Page $ of S RECORD OF COOPERATOR'S DECISIONS AND PROGRESS IN APPLICATION OPERATOR: Keith Farley OWNER: Keith Farley FARM NO. : 4741 TRACT NO. : 6029 ASSISTED BY: Raymond Mowery PLANNED APPLIED : Basic Conservation System :FIELD : Non-Irrigated Cropland :NUMBER : Amount Yr. : Amount M/Yr. : 2A oprj,q�, 1991 :389 - Striperoaain9. Wind . : :Strips perpendicular to the prevailing : : :wind will be maintained or established : . :no wider than 330' or 20 rods. These : :strips alternate with winter wheat and : : : fallow stubble. : . . : • . . ' . ' . . : '' ' : : : ' : . . . . ' . . . . ' . . . . ' ' . ' . . . ' a . ' : ; ': a a . , . : . ' ' ' ' . . ' • ' ' . ' ' . . , . . . ' . ' . : : . ' , ' , : TOTAL AC. THIS PAGE 8. 9 . : HIGHLY ERODIBLE LAND (HEL) AC. $5__ a. Field(s) designated "not highly erodible land (NHEL)". The application and maintenance of this conservation practice is not required for compliance with the Food Security Act of 1985. • ..ONVENTIONAL AND SPEC .iL SYMBOLS LEGEND FOR SOIL MAYS SPECIAL SYMBOLS FOR CULTURAL FEATURES SOIL SURVEY syE _Inn nousomics PITS SOIL DELINEATIONS ANO SVMOOLS NAUalaL Mate Or 00Nam —. — Gravel pd JG ay. ESCARPMENTS • County or Dares Mme Or(Parry Bedrock (Oo✓.Is down 000e) Mall civil&MOP MISCELLANEOUS CULTURAL FEATURES Other than Oedrnck • (points tlOwn MOW Reservalon(nalenal heel Or park. Farmstead,house SHORT STEEP SLOPE slats dent a wok. Iand m sown areas) and large a✓pall —.—.... Church i GULLY --- n Lane grant _.. . School E DEPRESSION OR SINK 0 Indian Mouit wit of sod survey(label) Indian mound(label) r-. SOIL SOIL SAMPLE SITE CD (r*rm shown)aay not sho ) Tower Fold shard mulch's*IL neallme LOCalad obdmcl(label) n MISCELLANEOUS Orr AD HOC BOUNDARY(label( Tank(label) • D*wad :Or..e....1-i—I) b • Small Amon,a✓IoM,Park.oilfield. --- Walls,ill or gas A Clay+COI carnality.or hood 000 U'P-"o,'�' , Windmill a Gravelly spiel •• STATE COORDINATE TICK Ked*n madden Guild*.sick or scabby spol lsodrtl 0 t AND DIVISION CORNERS L J_ _I—"T— Dumps and nlher Synder _ (seams and land grants) min SOO antes •a• ROADS Prominent hdl or peak Prominent Ow✓'sd(median sheen Rork oukmp e scale permitsl 1ewAIWs tarnisher*and sMla) Oteroads WATER FEATURES yI„*SPp1 + Trad DRAINAGE Sandy tool , rt_ ROAD EMOLCMS d DESIGNATIONS Perenn*l,double lone —^—._-• $evwey araeee spiel 9 Perennial,single Ion �•�•� ' Inlarslale Side Or sbp OAT Omni umlaut) Federal Iw Intermittent •'•��•••_ Q HJ Slaw slot,very Many soot Slat U Drawge end Highly Erodible Land NIL Camay.lain.Or ranch CM) Canals Ouches RAILROAD +--1--o Double line(label) rr^•4 Not Highly Erodible POWER TRANSMISSION LINE Dra✓agenum✓rogation —+....m . Land N EL (normally nos shown) PIPE LINE LAKES PONDS AND RESERVOIRS Ilnorwtady col sheen) t FENCE —v—.— Pereum.>t �� row✓malty not shown I . • tor . r . LEVEES Inlermdlent •• ` : WOW road MISCELLANEOUS WATER FEATURES i Web road Marsh or swamp With railroad I SOrmg n- DAMS WOE artesian m l/ Large Ito scale) > Waw,wr gat*n � Medium or small war Wel sere M (taken from published soil survey text for use as a soil man l000n/tsheot for FSA plans LEGEND • (F0PfSA CONSERVATION PLAN )• — Form Operations Boundary —®--®- Fence,to be Removed ter. + Marsh .k — W Ownership Boundary .-O` 011th to be Removed 1' Land Use Tic Load Use flounder). -..r1�•. Intermittent Stream --MR-- Trail !"' Lond Use Capability or Site Boundary i f>.anti.. Deep Gullies 211 Building Temporary Vegetal Condhion Boundary l'a�-ormos•. Perennial Streams VII',J Rock Outcrop ✓J✓ ."--- Tempera). Physical Condition Boundary gllebl( Natural Darla Cr-• Carol 2A./CM Acres Required per Cow Month ...—:"...r.:. Important Ridge Top ,Jb- Stock Yard EC,GC,G,PG Range Condition -x-)=E-o- Cattle Guard H farmstead ,merit_ Surface Acres Wacky!, 000un Cow a Sheep Months V/ wet Spot 0 Field Number improved Rood a Pond or Lake Ina. Highly Erodibl Farm Road Or. Spring Land i•- -• Railroad O Move Portable Sprinkler Loterol µaft. Not Highly Erodi6le Land Abler IMrn/meet ere combined*Mr erne spweMr iherrooybe van es/a7prs.+:ore • /snit Sod Improved ImA, /erect WOW,a dl Ch, ale. , EXISTING PROPOSED' EXISTING PROPOSED -x-k- -I-I—.. Fence ---Q-,---. pivisien Bas or roman y —e.d...—a •mod/-I-411- Electric Fence 0 0 ' pipe Rim ©0000 + + + + + Shollerbell ..- -II--s• �----0--- Diversion Dam A. A S a p a Streom Dank Protection -----I -----0--t- Cheek 00(0 ar Gully Mug unlwuiwuiu atw awn will on I--a 1--1 awn mmt Inns Oika or Levee prop or Overfed Pipe Line or Sprinkler Main CZIE ciiii Dom and Reservoir 1-40.•-"•0•-'r -•0F•iM-r Pormonant Sprinkler Lateral -CZ( -C1( ' Slotk fond +'y"a—e- -a-+-•e--a- Portable Sprinkler Lateral [}+ Oe—. Spring Developmeal -k"y—�-ti 4--)-4...t—• Flume �,Q� t5r t i— Spring and Trough rnnsc -- GOnal filer/ d/ Trough Irrigation Ditch O O Well I ---•-« Direction of trrigotion 6 • ---I__, — 6 Windmill —,--gyp-- ---r•—�— Pickup Ditch Windmill and Trough —e+o— -6--o Olversion Dileh Q C11 Water Tank -- -• «----8 Drainage a Woste bitch m ® ' Pump --a^—a"' —0---•o•4' C:osed Drain [_] ® Solt Ground —r—r--r— ---r--.. TorroCe Q 171 Sena Reservoir err ► u ^^► loo Tide or Flood Gole 7-i:rS134 u..1 Offsminrn•M•beaYa Mar a.,,,, YIM,LMVYYNM wawa U.S. Department of A3riculture Pa3e 1 Conservation Service 05/16/89 SOI! DESCRIPTION REPORT SURVEY AREA - 4T.LD COUNTY, NORTHSRN PART, COLORADO • Map Unit _ Symbol Description 10 NUINN LOAM., 0 TO 6 PERCENT SLOPES The Nunn soil is a deep , well drained soil . It i5 formed on sli3hrtly dissected plains and stream terraces from calcareous loamy al { uvial material . The surface is a loam. The vnder :yin2 mater' ia ) calcareous clay loam. fne soils have perm •an i l l ty. Their ava i lathe Water. ho l d i n capacity is high .. 2 ots penetrate to _0 inches or more . Runof ." is medium and the erosion hazard due to wind is cIi3ht . Category Codes : sal _ 1 \\*....3/41..nej (Si:: •---....s. - 40 4. I 5 f r4. 4 ( 1 .t 36 35 16 4' 4 • 4 4 i y ' 5 ao+ . e•-•--..„ •° • � .. . � 40 4 1 5 40 a eo. � ��" — .. .may . .i,— ` ..1 54 t a40 5 a. :. 4 16 70 2 4 _ r -rl ' S 5 1.� ' 16 19 c5 5 40 54 •••"*"...---------\5 4 0 40 1 5 ?cr...\\2,,,C...\ \1/4.5_,..\ • 19 14 V ` e ? /- // -- u.E.DEPARTMENT Or AGRICULTURE ru•+ Co $ S S SCSOA-14 Tea." 6DAV Lv1 I - r/ -S8 (34s) \ SOIL. MAP 1 \ Owner Ke. ; FI Fa it/C1 Operator S a."^a \ County tale I d State ea / O \` Soil survey sheet(s)or code nos. t v C N w- / q Approximate scale N �'T.I Prepared by U. S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service cooperating • 5 I} with W C 5+ G r a t h So : ( Conservation District \\\ \ i \ \ I / \ 1 \ '1 / \ \ RESOLUTION RE: APPROVE AGREEMENT FOR STREET GRADING AND SNOW REMOVAL BETWEEN WELD COUNTY AND TOWN OF FREDERICK AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Town of Frederick wishes to have Weld County perform grading and snow removal services on certain portions of Weld County Roads 18, 16, 15, 13, and 11 within the town boundaries, and WHEREAS, the Board has been presented with an Agreement for such grading and snow removal, the terms and conditions being stated in said Agreement, and wHEREAS, after review, the Board deems it advisable to approve said Agreement, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the Agreement for grading and snow removal between the Town of Frederick and Weld County be, and hereby is, approved. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that the Chairman be, and hereby is, authorized to sign said Agreement. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 5th day of September, A.D. , 1990, nunc pro tune July 26, 1990. ._ BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: V/Ott Weld C u -nEy erk to the Board Ge a R. Brante2Italrman By \\J nizdz< tc Ge ge Kennedy, Pro-Tem Deputy Clerk to the Board y APPROVED AS TO FORM: Constance L. Harbert C ->gC7 C sr County Attorney Ger i 900805 c � �l-+ OO,2 cc: • L vi s'� ��rJ�•ck sister MEMORAnDUM To Clerk to the Board Date ciglyyt 29, 1990 COLORADO From George Goodell, Director Subject: Agenda Item Please place the following item on the Board's next agenda: Street Grading and Snow Removal Agreement between the Town of Frederick and Weld County Two copies of the Agreement signed by the Town o£ Frederick are attached. GG/zw:zmgg cc: Commissioner Kirby Town of Frederick File 900505 1 COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO STREET GRADING AND SNOW REMOVAL AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this �� day o£ 1920 by and between THE TOWN OF FREDERICK, hereinafter referred to as th "To ", and the County of Weld, by and through the Board of County Commissioners of the County of Weld, hereinafter referred to as the "County": WHEREAS, The Town is desirous of entering into a contract with the County for the performance of street grading on the following roads within the incorporated area of the Town of Frederick: 1. WCR 16 East of I-25 for 3/4 mile and between WCR 11 and 13. 2. WCR 16 East of the Town of Frederick to WCR 15 3. WCR 15 from WCR 16 to State Highway 52 4. WCR 11 from WCR 52 to WCR 16 WHEREAS, The Town is desirous of entering into a contract with the County for the performance of snow removal on asphalt streets with the incorporated area of the Town of Frederick: 1. WCR 13 from State Highway 52 to WCR 18-1/2 2. WCR 18 from I-25 to WCR 13 3. WCR 11 from WCR 52 to WCR 16 WHEREAS, The County is agreeable to rendering such services on the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, WHEREAS, such contracts are authorized and provided for by the provisions of 29-1-203, Colorado Revised Statutes as Amended, 1973, and so provided for by the Weld County Home Rule Charter, Section 2-3, NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the terms of the aforesaid statute and Weld County Home Rule Charter, it is agreed as follows: 1. That the County, by way of the Road and Bridge Department, agrees to provide street grading services upon written request of the Town. 2. That the County shall furnish and supply all labor, supervision and equipment to grade streets and remove snow. 3. The Town shall submit in writing to the County a request and date for completion. Such work order shall be approved by both the Town and County. The Town understands that County projects will be given priority and that grading and snow removal will be scheduled so as not to interfere with County work. 4. The Town agrees to pay the County for the services rendered under this agreement at the cost incurred by the County. The Town understands that this cost will vary in accordance with the salary of the personnel completing task and the equipment used, but the average cost will be approximately $35.00 per hour as of the date of this agreement. 5. The County understands that they will not necessarily be the exclusive contractor for this type of service and that the Town may employ whomever they determine to be most adequate to perform such services. 6. The Town shall indemnify the County, its officers and employees against liability for injury or damage caused by any negligent act or omission of • any of its employees or agents in the performance of this agreement, and shall hold the County, its agents and employees, harmless from any loss occasioned as a result of the performance of this agreement. 7. This agreement shall run from year to year unless terminated by either the Town or the County, providing the party seeking to terminate this agreement gives the other party ten (10) days written notice. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have signed this Agreement this 5th day of Se tember . 19 90, A.D. ATTEST: WU% BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO WELD COUNTY CLERK TO THE BOARD i c n Aerigat izi Deputy,Clerk to the Board W' /J �l � 56.Letv61 CL OF THE B OF USTEES L MAYOR 9C CS // :zfga ✓ RESOLUTION RE: APPROVE AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, AND THE WELD LIBRARY DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN WHEREAS, the Board o£ County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board has been presented with an Amendment to the Lease Agreement between Weld County, Colorado, and the Weld Library District Board of Trustees, for the building located at 4th Street and Maple, Frederick, Colorado 80530, and WHEREAS, a copy o£ said Amendment to the Lease is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and WHEREAS, after review, the Board deems it advisable to approve said Amendment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the Amendment to the Lease Agreement between Weld County, Colorado, and the Weld Library District Board of Trustees be, and hereby is, approved. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that the Chairman be, and hereby is, authorized to sign said Lease Agreement. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 5th day of September, A.D. , 1990. BO OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST y100,4/ � WEL COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County Clerk to the Board / R. Bran ner, Chairman ,eo ge ennedy, Pro-Tem De/ uty Clerk to t Board ;31:14‘4 y APPROVED AS TO FORM: Constance L. Harbert C.W. Kirby County Attorney ExCUSED Gordon E. Lacy 900804 <-I; ,c)cr / ce : 4 WELD LIBRARY DISTRICT 2227 23,c Avenue Greeley.Caaaco 8003, 303/330701 .4:14--thetZereeta, le- 7 , 900804 AMENDMENT TO LEASE WHEREAS, on October 21, 1987, THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, hereinafter referred to as "Landlord", and MME WELD LIBRARY DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES, hereinafter referred to as "Tenant", entered into a lease agreement for a building located at 4th Street and Maple, Frederick, Colorado, and WHEREAS, Section I - aerm reads as follows: The term of this Lease Agreement shall commence on the first day of December, 1987, and shall continue for a period of five years whereupon on the thirty-first day of December, 1992, it shall automatically terminate by its own terms unless, at least one hundred eighty (180) days prior to the expiration date and in accordance with Section VI, the Landlord and Tenant agree, in writing, to extend the term of such Lease Agreement, and WHEREAS, both parties desire to amend Section I - arm nunc pro tunc to July 18, 1988, to read as follows: The term of this Lease Agreement shall commence on the first day of December, 1987, and shall be automatically renewed each year unless terminated by either party ninety days prior to year end. If lease is terminated by Landlord, the Landlord shall repay Tenant the difference between current appraised value determined by an agreed upon third party appraiser, and rental payments to date less interest of 7.616% annually on a $99,052.33 principal amount amortized over a ten year period, WHEREAS, Section II - Rental reads as follows: The rent to be paid by the Tenant to the Landlord for the above- described premises shall be at the rate of EIGHT HUNDRED AND THIRTY-FOUR DOLLARS ($834.00) per month, payable on the first day of each month this Lease Agreement is in effect. WHEREAS, both parties desire to amend Section II - Rental nunc pro tunc to July 18, 1988, to read as follows: The rent to be paid by the Tenant to the Landlord for the above- described premises shall be at the rate of TWENTY-FOUR THOUSAND, FIVE HUNDRED, FIFTY NINE DOLLARS (824,559.00) per year for five years beginning in 1988, and then beginning January 1, 1993, the rate shall be ONE DOLLAR ($1,00) per year thereafter. Page 1 of 2 Pages Sae OSP I IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Lease Agreement Amendment to be executed as of September 5, 1990, nunc pro tune, to July 18, 1988. LANDLORD: ATTEST: 44/11/44017 BOARD OF C UNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD C , COLO Weld County Clerk to the �Board By Chairman BY:LciL [ � Ti. l / L�YX1Uti Deputy lerk to the Board TENANT: BOARD OF TRUSTEES ' ATTEST: WELD LIBRARY ISTRIC � By: STL� ((—F(Y _� � Page 2 of 2 Pages (#�+Qc• J RESOLUTION RE: APPROVE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN WELD COUNTY AND COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY COOPERATIVE EXTENSION AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners o£ Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs o£ Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board has been presented with a Memorandum of Understanding between Weld County and Colorado State University Cooperative Extension for Cooperative Extension programs in Weld County, and WHEREAS, the terms and conditions are as stated in said Memorandum of Understanding, a copy being attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and WHEREAS, after review, the Board deems it advisable to approve said Memorandum o£ Understanding. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board o£ County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the Memorandum of Understanding between Weld County and Colorado State University Cooperative Extension for cooperative extension programs be, and hereby is, approved. II BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that the Chairman be, and hereby is, authorized to sign said Memorandum of Understanding. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 5th day of September, A.D. , 1990. BO F COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST:�WU% BO Y, COLORADO Weld Count Clerk to the Board � y - Gene R. ES r, airman . 1 --` �T3Y: )b-N,L ,,r a ge Kennedy, Pro-Tem teputy Clerk to the Board APPROVED AS TO FORM: onstancce L. Herber l�j� C.W. Kir� County Attorney EXCUSED Gordon E. Lacy 900812 COOPERATIVE EXTENSION MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING This Memorandum of Understanding entered this day dam, 1980, by and between Colorado State University Cooperatve Extension, hereinafter referred to as'Extension': and the County d Weld,State of Colorado, hereinafter referred to as"County,for Cooperative Extension Programs. WITNESSETH THAT: WHEREAS, County desires to participate in the educational programs as authorized by the Smith-Lever Act, as amended, and other acts supporting Cooperative Extension programs which include the conduct of Extension programs and dissemination of relevant research findings In agriculture and related fields,home and family living,and 4H and youth in the county; and, WHEREAS, Extension is authorized by State and Federal law to conduct Cooperative Extension educational programs in the State of Colorado; and, WHEREAS, Extension programs are developed in response to local needs, based on advice from a County Extension Advisory Committee; and, WHEREAS, Extension and County desire to enter into this Memorandum of Understanding as a master document to set out the nature of the program and tho relationship of the parties: NOW, THEREFORE, the parties do hereby agree to expend their best efforts to conduct and support a Cooperative Extension program under the following tents and conditions: Section 1. County agrees: (a)To furnish suitable office space,and pay the essential costs of utilities,travel, office expense,supplies and equipment needed in the conduct of Cooperative Extension programs in the county. (b)To provide by reimbursement to Extension,the applicable amount of the professional staff funding based on a formula developed and updated annually, approved by the State Board of Agriculture, to provide for increased funding to match the Long Appropriations Bill as determined by the State Legislature. (c) To provide necessary and adequate clerical and secretarial personnel. (d) To submit to the Director of Colorado Cooperative Extension a copy of the county budget approved for items(a), (b) and(c)above. The budget will be certified as true and correct by the responsible county officer and will be submitted prior to the beginning of each calendar year. (e)To annually review this MOU at the beginning of each calendar year and affirm or appoint members of the County Extension Advisory Committee. (f)To participate in the selection procedure of professional Extension staff for the county in accordance with Colorado State University Cooperative Extension Personnel Policies and Procedures. ,Section 2. Extension earees: (a)To provide leadership and administration of programs and staff of Colorado State University Cooperative Extension. (b) Wkh the approval of the county, recruit, appoint and supervise professional staff to serve in the county. (c)To provide qualified state and regional specialists that are available to train and assist county staffs in the conduct of county extension educational programs. (d) To provide by direct payment to professional staff, the total professional staff salary that includes the formula as described in 1 (b). 900822 (e) To provide payment of all employer fringe benefit costs. Section 3. Extension and County mutualN agree. (a) To place in the county, and support In accord with this MOU, 6 FTE professional staff, using a staffing index as a guide. (b) That the personnel costs of this staff(Section 3(a))will be provided by the parties as described In Section 1 (b)and 2(d)above. This agreement will In no way limk either parry at their sole discretion from employing additional professional or paraprofessional personnel in the County Extension Office at their own expense. (c) To notify the other party in writing at least sixty(60) days prior to any expected major change in program which would affect the professional personnel Or support of the program. (d) Colorado State University Cooperative Extension,as a publkdy funded educational organization,operates in compliance with the Civil Rights Act of 1964,Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and as such, all programs, activkies and employment opportunkles are available without regard to race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age or disability. Section 4, This Memorandum of Understanding shall remain in full force and effect from year to year until terminated by either party by written notice given shay (60) days prior to the anticipated time of tenMnation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties hereto have set their hands as indicated below: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY ATTEST: � b/ 9/5/90 9/5/90 field County Clerk to the Board'Date missionor, Chair Date g w Deputy Werk to the Board COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY COOPERATNE EXTENSION ATTE s � 9 a_ �(1Yu�yyr� 9 c Assistant tO the DI MoeCate' Director D e Revised 12/7/89 1 RESOLUTION RE: APPROVE CONTRACT WITH COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH FOR DIVISION OF EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES GRANTS PROGRAM AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN WHEREAS, the Board o£ County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board has been presented with a Contract with the Colorado Department of Health for the Division of Emergency Medical Services grants program, and WHEREAS, the term of said Contract is from September 21, 1990, through September 21, 1991, with the further terms and conditions being as stated in the Contract, and WHEREAS, after study and review, the Board deems it advisable to approve said Contract, a copy being attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the Contract with the Colorado Department of Health for the Division of Emergency Medical Services grants program be, and hereby is, approved. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that the Chairman be, and hereby is, authorized to sign said Contract. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the Sth day of September, A.D. , 1990. BOARD F COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST:4 Ar�� WELD UNTY, LORADO Weld County Clerk to the Board ne R. Brantner, Chairman 3-4000e A BY: \-1 41iL - l ��cc.Y[�1cr r Ge ge Kennedy, Pro-Tem D,puty Cleac to 1the Board APPROVED AS TO FORM: Cons`!Jncce . Harbert cesar.7 C.W. Kirby 0 County Attorney EXCUSED Gordon E. Lacy 900803 STATE OF COLORADO COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 4210 East 11th Avenue Teletar: Denver,Colorado 80220-3716 003)322.9076(Main Building/Denver) r.` Phone (303) 320-8333 003)320452e(Mmmeannacernmw) 007)246.7190(Grand)unction Regional Office) August 28, 1990 Roy Romer GOvemor Thomas M.VernOn,M.D. Executive'Vector Vern Hammera, Communications Director Weld County Regional Communications 915 - 10th Street P.O. Box 758 Greeley, CO 80632 Dear Mr. Hammera, Enclosed arc four (4 ) copies of your contract with the State for your grant. Please have all copies signed by the signing authority of the contracting agency. You must type the name and title of the signatory, if it is not listed, on the last page under the area of the signature titled "Position (Title ) " followed by the social security number or Federal I .D. Number. Each copy must also have an attested signature ( the seal is not necessary) . We must also have an Assurance Sheet for each agency we are contracting with. Please fill this out and return it to our office with the contracts. Return all four (4) completed contracts and the Assurance Sheet to me at the above address. If you have any questions you may contact me at ( 303 ) 331-8630 . Sincerelagee4C y,, Arleen Way, Grant - . .nager Emergency Medical Services Division Enclosures: Contracts (4) Assurance Sheet 900003 • • /a,,,,bwC-OZA rR 3/131 oannyMENT OR AGENCY NUMaER 260000 CONTRACT socriNG numa£R CONTRACT THIS CONTRACT. made this 21st day of September _199 0 by and between the State of Colorado for the use and benefit of the Department of '' HEALTH 4210 E. 11th Avenue. Denver, Colorado 80220 hereinafter referred to as the grate.and '= Weld County, 91510th Street, P.O. Sops 758 Greeley. CO 80632 hereinafter teferred to as the contractor. WHEREAS. authority exists in the Law and Funds have been budgeted, appropriated and otherwise made available and a sufficient unencumbered balance thereof remains available for payment in Fund Number 1001 Qt. Account Number 5.4727 .Contract Encumbrance Number O379317 :and WHEREAS, required approval, clearance and coordination has been accomplished from and with appropriate agencies;and WHEREAS the purpose of the Division of Emergency Medical Services ( EMS ) grants program is to improve statewide emergency medical services in the State of Colorado pursuant to CRS Sec. 1 , 25-3. 5-601 ; WHEREAS the State wishes to fund the contractor as a provider of EMS for this purpose; WHEREAS the Contractor has been licensed to provide services in the State of Colorado; WHEREAS as of the date of eaecution of this contract, the Contractor meets all other qualifications for provision of emergency medical services; and WHEREAS the Contractor was selected in accordance with the State of Colorado Procurement Code. NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed that for and in consideration of their mutual promises to each other, hereinafter stated, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1 . The Contractor has obtained a bid for communications equipment comparable to State bid price and will purchase said equipment at that price for the, purpose of providing enhanced emergency medical communications services to Weld County and surrounding areas. 2. The Contractor will submit an itemized list of equipment for review and approval by the Colorado EMS Division prior to purchase. No payment will .be made to the Contractor until the State Controller has signed off on this EMS approved equipment list. 3 . The Contractor will document the provision of enhanced services by keeping detailed records of call volume, call response times, and QC©8ny3 Page 1 of S pages provide a user _valuation of improved communications. This information must be available to the EMS Division upon request. 4 . The equipment purchased through this contract is to be installed and used for the specific purpose of emergency medical service. The Contractor will keep inventory control records on the equipment and inform the State of any relocation of this equipment. 5. Should the Contractor cease to provide emergency medical services in the State of Colorado the communication equipment must be placed upon Division approval , with another operating EMS provider in the state or sold at public auction for fair market value and 50% of the proceeds from that sale returned to the State. The percent returned to the State reflects the State' s contribution to the original price. 6. The Contractor shall provide the State with documentation of purchase of the equipment specified and comply with the following State reporting requirements: a) the Contractor will maintain detailed maintenance records on this equipment. b) the Contractor will supply the State with a six ( 6 ) month and twelve ( 12 ) month progress report in the format requested by the State. 7. For and in consideration of these services the Contractor will receive the following compensation. The State and the Contractor will share the cost of the equipment and the State's obligation will not exceed cost $15 , %00.00, Fifteen Thousand and Seven Hundred Dollars. Any costs in excess of $15, 700 . 00 (State share ) shall be the responsibility of the Contractor. The Contractor will provide matching funds in the amount of 515 , 700. 00. Payment will be made upon receipt of a signed request for reimbursement , submitted in duplicate . A copy o£ the invoice from the equipment vendor must accompany the request and payment will be contingent upon affirmation by the EMS Division of full and satisfactory compliance with the terms of this contract. 8. During the term of this contract and any renewal hereof, the Contractor agrees that it will keep in force a policy or policies of comprehensive general liability insurance, issued by a company authorized to do business in Colorado in an amount not less than S600 , 000 combined single limit for total injuries or damages arising from any one incident ( for bodily injuries or damages) . The Contractor shall provide the State with a Certificate of Insurance as evidence that such insurance is in effect at the inception of, this contract. 9 . The term of this contract shall be from September 21 , 1990 to September 21 , 1991 . Orr Page 2 of 5 Pages v �y �?� 'COLORADO DEPAILIKENI OF HEALTH — hereinafter, under the General Provisions referred to as "Health% aroma PROVISIONS 1. The parties of this contract intend that the relationship between them contemplated by this contract is that of employer-independent contractor. No agent, employee or servant of Contractor shall be or shall be deemed to be an employee, agent or servant 'of Health. Contractor will be solely sad entirely responsible for its acts and the acts of its agents, employees. servants and subcontractors during the performance of this contract. 2. At all times during the performance of this contract, the Contractor shall strictly adhere to all applicable federal and state laws that have been or may hereafter be established. 3. Contractor authorizes Health to perform audits and to make inspections for the purpose of evaluating performance under this contract. 4. Either party shall have the right to terminate this agreement by giving the other _party thirty days notice by registered mail, return receipt requested. If notice is so given, this agreement shall terminate on the expiration of the thirty days, and the liability of the parties hereunder for the further performance of the terms of this agreement shall thereupon cease, but the parties shall not be relieved of the duty to perform their obligations up to the data of termination. 5. Thia agreement is intended as the complete integration of all understandings between the parties. No prior or contemporaneous addition, deletion, or other amendment hereto shall have any force or effect whatsoever, unless embodied herein in writing. Yo subsequent novation, renewal, addition, deletion, or other amendment hereto shall have any force, or effect unless embodied in a written contract executed and approved pursuant to the State Fiscal Rules. 6. If this contract involves the expenditure of federal funds, this contract is contingent upon continued availability of federal funds for payment pursuant to the terms of this agreement. Contractor also agrees to fulfill the requirements of Office of Management and Budget Circulara A-87 and A-102 or A-110, whichever is applicable. 7. To be cpnsidered for payment, billings for reimbursement pursuant to this contract must be received within 60 days after the period for which reimbursement is being requested and final billings on the contract must be received by the State Health Department within 60 days after the end of the contract term. 8. If applicable, Local Match is to be submitted on the monthly reimbursement statements, is the column provided, as required by the funding source. 9. If Contractor receives 5 25,000.00 or more per year in Federal funds in the aggregate from Health, Contractor agrees to have an annual audit, by an independent certified public accountant, which meets the requirements of Office of Management and Budget Circular A-128. If Contractor is required to submit an annual indirect cost proposal to Health for review and approval. Contractor's auditor will audit the proposal in accordance with the requirements of OMB Circular A-87. Contractor agrees to furnish one copy of the audit reports to the Health Department Accounting Office within 30 days of their issuance, but not later than nine months after the end of Contractor's fiscal year. Contractor agrees to' take appropriate corrective action within six months of the report's issuance in instances of noncompliance with Federal laws and regulations. Contractor agrees to permit Health or its agents co have access to its records and financial statements as necessary, and further agrees to retain such records ant financial statements for a period of three years after the date of issuance of the audit report. This contract does not contain federal funds as of the date it is signed. This requirement Is in addition to any other audit requirements contained in other paragraphs within this contract. 10. If applicable. Contractor agrees to. not use Federal funds to satisfy Federal cost sharing and matching requirements unless approved in writing by the appropriate Federal Agency. Page 3 of 5 Pages Rev. 06/06/88 JC38^3 t • term sACtan SPECIAL PROVISIONS CONTROLLER'S APPROVAL 1. This contract shall not be deemed valid until itsludl have been approved by the Controllerarlba State of Colorado or such anima as he may Peen.This provision is applicable to any contract involving the payment of money by the Sure. FIIND AVAILABILITY 2 FumneialobGtationsoftheStalePayableafterdiemeantl4calyeararecontingenteposfundsforthatpeweebeingappropriated.budgetedatdotherwise made available. BOND REQUIREMENT 3. If this contract involves the payment of more than fifty thousand dollars for the CCesauctioe,erection.rapav,maimlenne .dr improvement deny building. road,bridge.viaduct,tunnel,excavation or other public worts for this State-die caovaerar shag bdae entering tbe oedemas=of any such work included intbit contract,duly execute and deliver to arid file with the oRtcialwhose newton Inman below fade Rana Podadsuffh6ent beedeeaher acceptable surety the approved by said official M a penal sum not less than one-half of the total amount payable by the terms adds contract.Such bond spell be duly expired by• endifiedaxporate surety,conditioned for the due and faithful perfeemaecedtbecomtract.and in addition.shall provide Wmifrhaoontratxaahis auboontracton fail to duly pay for any labor.materials,team hire.sustenance.provisions.praetor a other supplies used aeowmedby such aomaaororhissubcoeb.ttor in performance of the work convected to be dare,the surety will pay the same is an amount not exceeding the sum spertad lode bona togetherwkh interest at the rate of tint per cent per&anent.Unless such bond.whenso required.is executed,delivered=dcoed,no claim m favor tithe compact arisingumderthfs one ea shall be audited,allowed or poid.A certified orcashier's cheek orabank money order payable to the Trerurerofthe Seta of Calondo may ba accepted in lieu of bond.This provision is in compliance with 38.26-106 CRS,as amended. DMEILNIFICATION 4. To the extent authorized by law,the contractor shag indemnify.save aed hold harmless the State,its employees and.pmt',spirt any and all claims. damage.liability and court search attending cost&expanses,end attorney fees incurred as a result d any as or omission by the contractor.or its employee. agent',subcontractors.or assignees pursuant t lee terms of this contract. DISCRIMECATION AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION 3. The contractor agrees to comply with the letter and spirit of the Colorado Antidiscrimination Act of 1957,as amended,and other applicable law re tecting discrimination and unfair employment practices(24-34.402 CRS 1982 Replacemmn Vol.).and as required by Executive Order,Equal Opportunity and Affirma- tive Action.dated April 16. 1975.Pursuant[here%the following provisions shall be contained in off Star matrons or orb-cvwmaet. During the performance of this contract,the contractor apses as follows: 0) The convector will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race,sad.Color.national origin.sex,marital status. robe*.&ncesuy.menW Of pnysioal handicap,or age.The contractor will take affirmative aetioe to SIM that applicants are employed,and that employees are treated during employment.without regard to the above mentioned chancutistia.Such action shag include,but not to limned to the following employment, upgrading.demotion.or transfer,recruitment or recruitment advertising:layoffs orterminatioes:rata dpay Of other fors ofedmpausti6n:and selection fa training,including apprenticeship,The contractor agrees to poet in conspicuousplaea,available toempbyeaand spplicens foremploymant.notices robe pro- vided by the contracting officer setting forth provisions of this non-discrimination clause. (2) The convector wilt.in all solicitations oradveniseme s reemployees placed by oron Where(the contractor.swathe all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race,tread,color,national oritin.sex.marital status.religion,Weary.mental or physiCal handicap.or age. (3) The convaetr will send to each labor union Or representative of workers with which he has collective bargaining weeniest or other contract or understand- ing.notice to be provided by the contracting officer.advising the labor union et workers'repressnutive of the naanctors conunimnest under the Exectttive Order.Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action-dated Apil 16. 1973,and of the rules,regulations,and relevant Orders tithe Covent.. (4) The convaaor end labor unions will famish all information end'Wens required by Executive Order,Equal Opportunity and Affirmative AaiandApril 16, 1975,and by the rules,regulations and Orden of the Governor,or pursuant thereto,and will emit access to his books,reads,and aa0unts by the COndaaieg agency and the office of the Governor or his designee for purposes of investigation to ascertain compliance with such rides.regulation and orders, (5) A labor apatite/on will not exclude any individual otherwise qualified from full membership rights in such labor organization.orexpel any such individual from membership in such labor organization or discriminate spina any of its members in the fug enjoyment dworlt opportunity,because of race,creed,cola, sax,"Lionel origin.Of ancestry, (6) A labor orpnisauon,or the employees or members thereof will not aid,abet.incite.compel or coerce dedoing Many act denied in this comma to be dis- eiminatory or obstruct or proem any person from complying with the provisions ofthis contract or any order issued thereunder.or attempt tithe directly or indirectly.co commit any as defined in this contract to be discriminatory. 395.53-01.1022 Revisal 1/88 pate 4 or 5 pacts Detainees • • vcO ?�3 • Form 6-AC-02C rn In the emat of the ointractoes nothcatiptience with the mo-disrnmkation clauses of Ws conemace or with wormersrides,regulations.ororders,this Orr=mar M aenriled.terminated Or age old in whole or in part[Led the a rremor may be declared Ineligible for nutter Sun metrats M aoopnynp with 9toaadwes,wNaizedinExert.,Otte.EqualOPPortihah,andA rrenanArmenatApr716.197isodtheMa,tegelatitne.riderspromulgated in accordance therewith.and such other unarms as may be imposed and nmedires may be invoiced provided in bairnOrder.Equal Opporomiphand AfiUmedve Action of Apo 16. 1975,Of by miss,ep lotions,or adore pepoulpnd in acoordencetherewith.a as othewia Provided by law. (8) The corrector will include the porkies afwragrin(1)run(8)ln/ntl mnoaamt6 and mhmmnetarP ahw carcases ese mead by nde. reptletitns,aorde s issued Pursuant to Executive Order,Equal Opportunity and Affirmative.4tionaf Api116,197S.IDthatsod pOreiens wiU be binding iron each subcontractor or vinejor.The contractor will take such action with ripen to any suticaracting a purchase order athe mnnuWs{spay may direr,seaman'of enforcing such provisions,including pardons for aroompllmer provided.bowler,the In the event the contractor becomes involved in.or is threatened with.litigation with the suboxeectaorvendor murk of such thrice by the oonmWng agenoy.te contractor mayngwst the Sun of Garedo to enter into trap litigation to poem the Menat of the Sea of Colorado. COLORADO LABOR PREFERENCE 6a. Proviwiontof8-17401&102,CRSforpderewofColordolaboranapplicablendtiscoanctifpublicworttsMancheSunwundertatenhereun- der and an fioaocd in whole or is part by Sea Nods. • b. When construction contract for•public papal is to be awarded to•bidder,insider bidder shall be Allowed•parents spinet a namesidea bidder from a amen or Moir Daum,equal to the preference given or required by the water a foreign county in which tha aowoaldem bidder is a resident.Ifs is deter- mined by the officer responsible for■warding me bid that oomplianoe with this subsection A6 may cause denial*(blame hods which world otherwise be&viol. able or would otherwise be Lamaism with requirements of federal law,tins suhuarioa shall be suspended,but aniy to dm mart necessary to psvam denial of the moneys or to eliminate the inconsistency with federal requirements(erection 8.19-101 and 102.CRS). GENERAL. 7. The laws of die State of Colorado and rake and reguletraq Sued pursuant thereto shall be applied in the irate reudon,execution end adornment ofthis contract.Any provision of Nis contract whwhar or not incorporated Mr by reference which provide■for erbitmdon by ay extrrjugrnsi bogy of rumor or which is ahawire in conflict with said lows,roles and repletion&shall a teeaide d null and void.Nothing contained in any provision incorporated herein by trace which Pinion to nepa this or any other special prernice in whole or in pct shell be valid orenforceable err available in any action a law whether by way afcorimiaint,defense or otherwise.Any provision rendered null and void by the operation aftbis provision win not invalidate tin ronnMderofthis contra'to the extent that the correct is capable of execution 8. At all time dining the performance of this Contract.the Contractor shall strictly adhere to all apphcabk federal and wan laws,mule and regulations that have been or may hereafter M ewabibbed. 9. The sitmunia hereto aver that they are familiar with 184401,acseq.,(Bribery and Carmpt Influences)tad:'..g.rpl.It.an.(Abrs.d Public OCke). CBS 1978&Wiscemeet VOL.and that no violation of such provisions is present. 10. The signatories aver that to their knowledge, no state employee has a personal or beneficial imam whatsoever in the smite or property described berein: IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the potties hereto have executed this Contract on the day fins above maul. Contractor. (Pull Legal Name) Wrld County Gnvetnmrnt _ STATE err COWat00 xxjardJru�YR/i7f C i?ssio xsROY ROMER. GOVERNOR 7S ""` l 1� �1'� BY for the ro rxxCvtm tootecrotc Ptaition(Title) Gene R. Brctsner. Chairt dp 84-600813 apesLaduerin 3atn svist Rani to war DEPARSMEN! HEAL7N Cor(Seel) ) OF Attest(Seel) / 8y (� /a it , 1� V7 1c16 ,Ceps&•••r.w xewtthmo,T.weCerGper Oak . • APPROVALS ATTORNEY GENERAL CONTROLLER BY By_ • • e • PROGRAM APPROVAL: • Larry 4 cNattr Director EMS Division ape 5 wart is w W d 5 ropy m.awn.man(x..We men 'err nawwww Ca Male at. • tC•waze.aa SOCStna RESOLUTION RE: APPROVE PURCHASE OF SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN WELD COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES AND WELD COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority o£ administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board has been presented with a Purchase of Services Agreement between the Weld County Department of Social Services and the Weld County District Attorney, and WHEREAS, the term of said Agreement is from July 1, 1990, through June 30, 1991, with the further terms and conditions being as stated in the Agreement, and WHEREAS, after review, the Board deems it advisable to approve said Agreement, a copy being attached hereto and incorporated herein by .reference. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the Purchase of Services Agreement between the Weld County Department of Social Services and the Weld County District Attorney be, and hereby is, approved. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that the Chairman be, and hereby is, authorized to sign said Agreement. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 5th day o£ September, A.D. , 1990, nunc pro tunc July 1, 1990. p /J BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: L7ln/j 1 //;- / r, WELD OUNTY, /C�OLORArD�O B Weld County Clerk to the Board iC e� J Gene R rantner, Chairman Br: 67it-i� „ mil i Geo g Kennedy, Pro-Tem D puty Clerk to t Board APPROVED AS TO FORM: Constance L. Harb rt `� C.W. I irb� County Attorney EXCUSED Gordon E. Lacy 900811 <;500/ Y `_ a_ , SS , - -,4- �/� MEm®RAI1DU To Tom David Dare August 24. 1990 Weld County Attorney COLORADO From Gene McKenna, Director. Social Services Submct. Cooperative Reimbursement Agreement between Wald District Attorney and Weld Social Services R sat id—toll DC/Food sump traue Tom: Request your review of the attached agreements. These are continuation agreements for the 1991 Fiscal Year. After review and approval by the Board they are sent to the State Department of Social Services and enable County to obtain more favorable reimbursement for these work activities. Please advise if you need more information. Thank you for your assistance. CM:jac s 900806 • Purchase of Services Agreement Weld County Department Of Social Services This Agreement made this 5th day of September, 1990 between the Weld County Department of Social Services (hereinafter referred to as the "county") Al Dominguez, Weld County District Attorney 915 10 Street, Greeley Colorado and (name and address) (hereinafter referred to as the "Provider") Whereas, the County has been delegated authority and responsibility, by an Agreement with the State of Colorado Department of Social Services, for the conduct of investigations, administrative fraud hearings; prosecutions, claims establishment and collections involving intentional fraud in the AFDC program and and in the Food Stamp program (hereinafter referred to as the "Program"); and Whereas, the parties desire to enter into an Agreement for the provision agreed upon related services to the County as set forth in Exhibit I. Now therefore, the parties agree as follows: 1. The Provider shall render to the County the services identified in Exhibit I, entitled Scope of Services, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof by this reference. The Provider shall not bill the County for and shall not be reimbursed for time involved in activities other than those specified in Exhibit I, unless prior written approval of the County in obtained. 2. Services shall be provided only by staff identified in Exhibit II, entitled Purchase of Services Personnel, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof by this reference. 3. Inconsideration of services provided in accordance with this Agreement, Provider shall be compensated for all actual costs deemed reasonable and necessary by the County in accordance with state and federal regulations. Payments shall be made on the basis of Exhibit III, entitled Purchase of Services Budget, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof by this reference. The Purchase of Services Budget shall establish the maximum reimbursement which shall be paid during the duration of this Agreement. 4. The Provider shall submit monthly or quarterly billings substantiating costs incurred pursuant to this Agreement to the County in accordance with the rules and regulations of the County. A form of report or invoice to be used by the Provider will be provided by the County to facilitate the payment of reimbursement as provided in this Agreement. The County shall pay the Provider within 60 days of receipt of correct billings as follows: (a) All direct charges for personnel costs (Exhibit II) must be determined by multiplying the number of hours worked by the Provider (1) 1 and hie/her employee to provide services under this Agreement by their pre-determined hourly rates including employee benefits. All direct charges must be supported by time sheets or records. (1) For investigation function, only employees whose title is "Investigator shall be eligible for the increased funding. Exceptions shall be granted based on adequate justification that the majority of the job duties are specifically related to the investigative function. (2) Costs relating to the establishment and collection of claims when performed by investigators or prosecutors or by any separate unit having claims establishment and collection as its primary function shall be eligible for the funding. (b) Operating expenses are determined by an allocation method diotributing costs on a prorate basis to all activities under this Agreement. Operating expenses include supplies, materials, equipment, printing, reproduction, rent, normal telephone charges, utilities, repairs and maintenance. (1) Equipment Purchased with Federal, State and County Money Equipment with an acquisition cost of lees than $300 may be purchased pursuant to this Agreement. Equipment with an acquisition cost of $300 or more may be purchased upon prior written approval by the State Department and shall be capitalized and depreciated over the useful service life of equipment. (c) Direct charges for travel related to providing services under this Agreement. All expenditures for out-of-state travel for which reimbursement is requested must receive prior written approval of the County. (d) Direct charges for reasonable and essential short term training for staff providing services under the Agreement. All training for which reimbursement is requested must receive prior written approval of the County. (e) Specific direct charges for other costs related to providing services under the Agreement including filing fees, long distance telephone calls, polygraph tests, expert witness fees, and transcripts. (f) All other expenses must receive prior written approval by the County. 5. This Agreement shall be in effect from July 1, 1990, through June 30th, 1991, but not to exceed twelve (12) months. This Agreement may be renewed by mutual consent, provided that each renewal shall be for a period not exceed twelve (12) months. Said renewal shall contain (2) 5 appropriate amendments to Exhibit I, II, III, if necessary. Said renewals are expressly made subject to the approval of the Executive Director, Colorado Department of Social Services, or his designee; however, the State of Colorado, the Colorado Department of Social Services, the Executive Director, or his designee, are not parties to this Agreement. 6. The Provider shall maintain such records as are deemed necessary pursuant to County rules to assure a proper accounting for all costs and funds collected. These records will be made available for audit puropses to the U.S. Departments of government, the State Department of Social Services, the County, or any authorized representative of the State of Colorado, and will be retained for three (3) years after the expiration of this contract unless permission to destroy them is granted by the County. The Provider shall make financial, program progress and other reports as requested by the County or State Department of Social Services. 7. The County shall provide the Provider with all pertinent information available to the extent that such information is relevant to the services • to be performed pursuant to this Agreement. Information provided by the County in furtherance of the aims and purposes of this Agreement shall be used only-for the purpose intended and in accordance with Federal and State laws and regulations. The Provider shall provide for the security and confidentiality of information collected pursuant to this Agreement and as provided in the rules and regulations of the County. S. There shall be no religious worship, instruction or proselytization as part of or in connection with the performance of this Agreement. 9. None of the funds, materials, property, personnel or services contributed by the United States, the State Department of Social Services or the County under this Agreement shall be used for any partisan political activity, or to further the election or defeat of any candidate for office in a manner which would constitute a violation of 5 U.S.C. Sections 1501 et seq. 10. No assignment or subcontract shall be made by the Provider with any other party for furnishing any services contracted for without the prior written consent of the County. For services provided under any subcontract, the Provider shall be responsible for contract performance and compliance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 11. Reimbursement of costs incurred pursuant to this Agreement is expressly contingent upon the availability of federal funds. 12. The parties to this Purchase of Services Agreement agree to provide all reasonable and necessary information required to assess the effectiveness and appropriateness of this Agreement, and the County assumes the responsibility for conducting such assessments on a least an annual basis. 13. Provider certifies that, at the time of entering into this Contract, (3) it/s/he has currently in effect all necessary licenses, approvals, insurance, etc. required to properly provide the services and/or supplies covered by this Agreement. 14. The Provider shall at all times during the performance of this Agreement strictly adhere to all applicable federal and state laws and regulations, including protection of the confidentiality of all recipient records, papers, documents, tapes or any other materials that have been or may hereafter be established. 15. Provider shall permit the State and the U.S. Family Support Administration and any other duly authorized agent, to monitor all activities conducted by the Provider pursuant to tho terms of this Agreement. As the monitoring agency may in its sole discretion deem necessary or appropriate, such monitoring may consist of internal evaluation procedures, examination of program data, special analyses, on-site reviews, formal audit examinations, or any other reasonable procedures. All such monitoring shall be performed in a manner that will not unduly interfere with Agreement work. 16. All official reports of cases, recoveries, investigations, studies, etc., made as a result of thin Agreement shall acknowledge the support provided by the U.S. Family Support Administration and Colorado Department of Social Services. A copy of each such report shall be provided to the County. 17. The Provider is solely responsible for the conduct of individuals employed by the Provider, or under the direct supervision or control of the Provider, as identified in Exhibit II, "Purchase of Services Personnel". Governmental functions provided in support of the AFDC enforcement program by individuals other than those identified in Exhibit II are not the responsibility of the Provider except for acceptance or rejection of the work product of such individuals. 18. Either party shall have the right to terminate this contract by giving the other party thirty (30) days notice by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested. If notice is so given, this Contract shall terminate on the expiration of the thirty days, and the liability of the parties hereunder for further performance of the terms of this Contract shall thereupon cease, but the parties shall not be released from the duty to perform their obligations up to the date of termination. 19. The parties of this Agreement agree to amend it to conform with all changes in state and federal laws and regulations. 20. All alterations, modifications, or waivers of the provisions of this Cooperative Agreement shall be valid only when they have been reduced to writing and duly signed. 21. This Agreement contains all the terms and conditions agree upon by the parties, and no other agreement regarding the subject matter of this Agreement shall be deemed to exist to bind any of the parties hereto. (4) IN WITNESS WHEREOF County and the Provider have caused this Agreement to executed by their respective officers duly authorized to do so. This Agreement is expressly made subject to the approval of the Executive Director, Colorado Department of Social Services, or his designee; however, the State of Colorado, the Colorado Department of Social Services, the Execu v Direct or his designee, are not part part es of the Agreement. / /� ►r 9/5/90 • ovider chairman, Board of Data County Commissioners Al Domingue Weld Co. Dist. Attorney Greeley, 10 , Co. �.l� g/2-06 Greeley, Co. 80631 actor, Count Date partment of social Services ATTEST: PgrAh Y. 24Qt�� p Weld County Clerk to Board 0iti ,� � ID 'UG`'` ` �{ qn Executive eDirpt to ate /Gt4d \(�� i • /enC�K�Colorado Dept. of Social Services By: Deputy Cle to Board If the Board of Social Services resolves to empower the Chairman of the Board of Social Services to enter into and sign this Agreement for the County Commissioners then a copy of the Boards resolution to do so must be attached. (6) • M EXHIBIT I SCOPE OF SERVICES I. Investigation - Workers must have title Investigator or similar title. Other titles in the investigation unit must be justified and approved as an exception. ( ) a. Conduct in their entirety investigations of suspected intentional fraud affecting AFDC program administered by the county. ( ) b. Taking of formal, written statements of witnesses and suspects involved in a fraud case. ( ) c. Preparation of final report of investigation for presentation to District Attorney for prosecution and/or Administrative Hearing Officer. II. Administrative Fraud Hearings ( ) a. Establish appropriate referral system for cases to be scheduled for Administrative Fraud Hearings. ( ) b. Conduct Administrative Fraud Hearings in accordance with AFDC State manual.. III. Proeecutions - District Attorney (X) a. Establish criteria for referral of AFDC fraud eases to District Attorney. (X) b. Prosecute AFDC fraud cases under appropriate state statute, CRS 26-2-305, 1973, as amended, or other criminal/civil statute, (includes pre-trial, trial, and post-trial prosecutorial functions). IV. Claims Unit ( ) a. Establishment of claims determined from investigations, prosecutions and/or administrative fraud hearings. ( ) b. Collection of claims. ( ) c. Reporting of claims activities. (6) EXHIBIT II PURCHASE OF SERVICES PERSONNEL A. Instructions: Supervisor List the name and official title of the person who will set personnel policies, appoint new employees and will otherwise exercise supervisory authority for services to be provided under this agreement. Also, include his/her actual hourly rate including employee benefits, the estimated number of hie/her hours to be charged under this agreement. Supervior Supervisor Actual Hourly Estimated Estimated Name Title Rate Hours Cost See Item B below B. Instructions Personnel: List the name and official title of all personnel who will be providing services under this agreement. Also, include his/her actual hourly rate including employee benefits, the estimated number of his/her hours to be charged under this agreement, and estimated cost. Employee Percent Actual Hourly Estimated Estimated Title Of Time Rate Hours Cost Attorney Time $30.52 25 $ 763.00 Secretarial Time $11.81 50 $ 590.50 The District Attorney staff below will provide servicee to the County Department of Social Services to AFDC fraud cases. The actual assignment of cases will vary for each attorney and can not be estimated by employee. However, an estimate of the total hours to be charged is shown above. Attorney Staff Clerical Staff Al Dominguez DA Kathy Johnson Office Tech IV Thomas Quamman Asst. DA Lanette Coble Office Tech IV Ken Strock Dep. DA Susan Sander Dep. DA Rebecca Brunswig Dep. DA Tom Hanselmann Dep. D.A. C. Total Personnel Costs (transfer to Exhibit III, item 1) $ 1,353.50 (7) EXHIBIT III PURCHASE OF SERVICES BUDGET FOR PERIOD of July 1, 1990 THROUGH June 30, 1991 1. Total annual personnel coats including employee benefits. (From Exhibit II) $ 1,353.50 2. Operating costa (rent, utilities, telephone, supplies, etc., (itemize) Hourly Overhead rate based on all normal operating costs such as rent, telephone, janitorial serviees, & utilities. $7.01 x 75 hours $ 525.75 3. Travel (itemize by purpose) S - 0 - 4. Training Costs (itemize) $ - 0 - 5. Specific Direct Coate (itemize) $ - 0 - 6. Other expenses (itemize) $ - 0 - Total Costs $ 1,879.25 I RESOLUTION RE: DISMISS DANGEROUS BUILDING CITATION - HOWARD WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority o£ administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, David Howard was issued a citation of dangerous building under the Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings, and WHEREAS, said building was a fire damaged structure located on property owned by him and described as part o£ the N} and SW} of Section 28, Township 1 North, Range 67 west of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado, located at 1984 Weld County Road 17, and WHEREAS, this matter was considered at a meeting conducted on August 15, 1990, and continued to September 1, 1990 , for determination, and WHEREAS, on September 1, 1990, the Board received a recommendation from the Department of Planning Services that the violation no longer exists on this property therefore, said citation should be dismissed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the citation for Abatement of Dangerous Buildings issued to David Howard be, and hereby is, dismissed. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 5th day of September, /A�� .D. , 1/9990. ATTESTi BO OF COTY COMMI %/ Z.,�� WEL OUNTXUNCOLORADOSSIONERS i Weld County Clerk to the Board Aiz/e ne R. Brantner, C a rman i J _< _ r By1.. 'govt.? � ��4q ) Geo ge Kennedy, Pro-Tem Deity Clerk to t e Board APPROVE AS TO FORM: Constance L. Harbert frc___ � C.W. K�� County Attorney EXCUSED Gordon E. Lacy 900800 -fil_00 73 cc -P/ \--} ekiia• (' ‘ 1 e f)- RESOLUTION RE: ACTION OF BOARD CONCERNING VIOLATION OF THE UNIFORM CODE FOR ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS BUILDINGS - HOWARD WHEREAS, the Board o£ County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Weld County Department of Planning Services informed the Board of a building considered to be dangerous to persons under the Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings, said building being on property described as the N} and SW} of Section 28, Township 1 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado, located at 1984 Weld County Road 17, said property being owned by David Howard, and WHEREAS, the Board was advised that the fire damaged building was demolished, but the debris has not been removed from the hereinabove described property, and WHEREAS, after due consideration, the Board deems it advisable to allow David Howard until September 1, 1990, to remove said debris from the property, and WHEREAS, if said debris is not removed by September 1, 1990, the County will seek bids for the removal of said debris, and set a hearing date to consider recovering the cost of said work. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of weld County, Colorado, that David Howard be allowed until September 1, 1990 , to remove the debris from the hereinabove described property which is owned by him. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that if said debris has not be removed by September 1, 1990, the County will seek bids for the removal of the debris, and a hearing date will be set to consider recovery of the removal cost. 9001300 900752 CASE: BCV-1452 DATE: August 15, 1990 NOM: David Howard ADDRESS: 8709 Weld County Road 4 Brighton, CO 80601 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 101 and SWk of Section 28. TIN. R67W of the 6th P.N., Wald County, Colorado, located at 1984 Weld County Road 17. CASE SUMARY • 5-30-90 Letter sent with citation of dangerous building under the Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings. Fire damaged dangerous building ordered to be demolished or repaired by July 29, 1990. Property owner waived appeal of order to demolish or repair building by not responding within specified time period. 7-12-90 Property inspected. No change from stay 30, 1990. inspection. Three pictures taken. 7-17-90 Property inspected. House demolished. Large amount of debris remaining oa property. 8-2-90 Property inspected. No change from July 17, 1990, inspection. 8-3-90 Notice of hearing sent. 8-13-90 Property inspected. No change from July 17, 1990, inspection. The Department of Planning Services' staff recommends that the Board authorize the clean-up work to remove the debris located on the property and authorize the Purchasing Department to seek bids for the clean up and removal of debris by a private contractor. The staff would also recommend chat the Board set November 28, 1990, as the hearing data to consider recovering the cost of the clean-up work by special assessment or as a personal obligation of the property owner. On November 28. 1990. the staff will present ea itemized account of the expense interred by Weld County to complete the clean up of the property. 900752 RESOLUTION RE: ACTION OF BOARD CONCERNING VIOLATION OF THE UNIFORM CODE FOR ABATEMENT or DANGEROUS BUILDINGS - HOWARD WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Weld County Department of Planning Services informed the Board of a building considered to be dangerous to persons under the Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings, said building being on property described as the Ni and • SW} of Section 28, Township 1 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado, located at 1984 Weld County Road 17, said property being owned by David Howard, and WHEREAS, the Board was advised that the fire damaged building was demolished, but the debris has mot been removed from the hereinabove described property, and WHEREAS, after due consideration, the Board deems it advisable to allow David Howard until September 1, 1990, to remove said debris from the property, and WHEREAS, if said debris is not removed by September 1, 1990, the County will seek bids for the removal of said debris, and set a hearing date to consider recovering the cost of said work. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that David Howard be allowed until September 1, 1990, to remove the debris from the hereinabove described property which is owned by him. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that if said debris has not be removed by September 1, 1990, the County will seek bids for the removal of the debris, and a hearing date will be set to consider recovery of the removal cost. 900800 900752 Page 2 RE: DANGEROUS BUILDING - HOWARD The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 1Sth day of August, A.D. , 1990. (11 BO COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: Ahatel ` I titw62n WE , COL Weld County Clerk and Recorder X and Clerk to the Board ne R. Brant r, hairman B \.;I^��uiz�< .• ( ��II GedYge Kennedy, Pro-Tem puty County C ark EXCUSED DATE OF SIGNING - AYE APPROVED AS TO FORM: Constance L. Harbert �j� / `C C. Ka y County Attorney EXCUSED Gordon E. Lacy 900752 CASE: BCV-1452 DATE: August 15, 1990 NAME: David Howard ADDRESS: 8709 Weld County Road 4 Brighton, CO 80601 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Nil and SWit of Section 28, TIN. R67W o£ the 6th P.M., Weld Comity, Colorado, located at 1984 Weld County Road 17. CASE SUMMARY 5-30-90 Letter sent with citation of dangerous building under the Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings. Fire damaged dangerous building ordered to be demolished or repaired by July 29, 1990. Property owner waived appeal of order to demolish or repair building by not responding within specified time period. ' 7-12-90 Property inspected. No change from May 30. 1990, inspection. Three pictures taken. 7-17-90 Property inspected. House demolished. Large amount of debris remaining on property. 8-2-90 Property inspected. No change from July 17, 1990. inspection. 8-3-90 Notice of hearing sent. 8-13-90 Property inspected. No change from July 17, 1990, inspection. The Department of Planning Services' staff recommends that the Board • authorize the clean-up work co remove the debris located on the property and authorize the Purchasing Department to seek bids for the clean up and removal of debris by a private contractor. The staff would also recommend that the Board set November 28. 1990. as the bearing date to consider recovering the cost of the clean-up work by special assessment or as a personal obligation of the property owner. On November 28. 1990. the staff will present an itemized account of the expense incurred by Weld County to complete the clean up of the property. �CCart 900 752 • t p R •. � • . V -4v•.� `4 . .. • 1.+ yT . ` Al _ O • House demolished. Large pile of debris remaining. 7/17/90 irritant CASE MEMORANDDM T0: Case File FROM: Chuck CunliffeC411 NAME: David Howard LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: Nl! and Siik of Section 28. TIN. 8670 of the 6th P.M., Weld County. Colorado DATE: July 17. 1990 CASE =MR: SCV-1452 The howls has been demolished. A large pile of debris is on the sits. Still in violation. aCOS420 INTERNAL CASE !MORAN= TO: Case Pile FROM: Ed Stoner rJ/ NAME: David Bayard LEGAL DESCRIPTION 08 PROPERTY: Nat and SW: 28-1-67 DATE: August 2, 1990 CASE NUMBER: BCV-1452 Debris is still on site. Still in violation. pc: Chuck CunJi.ffe • it DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING INSPECTION PHONE(303)336x000.EXT 4425 tz0 tit V ;R:. 97510TH STREZ GREELEY,COLORADO 8007 6063' ik COLORADO r August 3, 1990 • Mr. David Howard 8709 weld County Road 4 Brighton, CO 80601 Subject: BCd-1452 - performance of demolition work on a parcel of land described as the PI1 and SW4 of Section 28, T1N, R67w of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado, located at 1984 Weld County Road 17. Dear Mr. Howard: The Weld County Hoard of County Commissioners has scheduled the matter co consider whether to authorize demolition work to remove portions of the fire damaged structure and debris on your property by the County or private contractor on Wednesday, August 15, 1990, starting ac 9:00 a.m. This meeting will be held in the Board of County commissioners' Hearing Room, First Floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado. Your presence, or your representative's presence, would be helpful to the Board of County Commissioners in case they have any questions when considering this matter. This office is ready to be of any assistance in clarifying or answering questions on this matter_ Please call or write. Sincerely, Chuck Conliffe, Director Department of Planning Services CAC:js Ll("053,20 A. RESOLUTION RE: GRANT MOBILE HOME PERMIT NO. 1681 - GAIL MILLER/JULIAN GOMEZ WHEREAS, the Board o£ County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, on the Sth day of September, 1990, considered the request of Gail Miller/Julian Gomez for a mobile home to be used as a principal dwelling, and WHEREAS, said mobile home is to be occupied in an A-Agricultural Zone District on a parcel of land being more particularly described as follows: Lots 30 and 31, Block 4, East Side Addition to Eaton, Weld County, Colorado WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners, having heard the testimony, finds that said request should be granted subject to the following conditions: 1) The applicant shall apply for a building permit for the mobile home within thirty days from the date of approval by the Board of County Commissioners; 2) A septic permit shall be obtained and the site shall meet percolation test requirements prior to the issuance of a building permit; 3) Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the owner shall submit evidence that the water tap is supplying water in such a manner as to be adequate in quality, quantity and dependability for the proposed use; and 4) The mobile home shall not be occupied until such time that the applicant has complied with the above mentioned conditions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the request of Gail Miller/Julian Gomez for permission to place a mobile home to be used as a principal dwelling on the above described parcel of land, which was found to be in compliance with Section 43 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, be, and hereby is, granted subject to the hereinabove listed conditions. 900801 PI- Oina cc P/, hi& Page 2 RE: ZPMH #1681 - MILLER/GOMEZ The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 5th day of September, A.D. , 1990. n /Ma? BOARD OF COUNTY COLORADO SYONERS ATTEST: �1/(,/// / WELD LINTY, COLORADO Weld County Clerk to the Board ne R. Brant er, Chairman i/1 ‘B]C�c71k-nt- e / /,{ f . rC-tc�' Georg- a Xe en dy, Pro-TOM---t / Deputy Clerk toVthe Board APPROVED AS TO FORM: n once . Hte C.W. ICiYby / O County Attorney EXCUSED Gordon E. Lacy 900801 MOBILE HOME ZONING PERMIT ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW Date: September 5, 1990 ZPMH: 1681 Applicant: Gail Miller/Julian Gomez This request is for one mobile home to be used as a principal dwelling Legal Description of Parcel: Lots 30 and 31, Block Q, East Side Addition to Eaton The Department of Planning Services' staff has reviewed this request and approves this request for the following reasons: WILL WILL NOT X Be compatible with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. X Be compatible with the surrounding area. X Be in harmony with the character of the neighborhood. x Adversely affect the immediate area. X Be adequately served by water and sewage disposal facilities. X Adversely affect the general health, safety, and welfare of the inhabitants of the area and the County. The Department o£ Planning Services' staff recommendation for approval is conditional upon the following: 1. The applicant obtaining a building permit for the mobile home prior to locating the mobile home on the property. 2. A septic permit shall be obtained from the Weld County Health Department prior to the issuance of a building permit. 9OO8O1 EPmE-1681 Gail Miller/Julian Gomez Page 2 3. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the owner shall submit evidence that East Eaton Water District is supplying water in such a manner as to be adequate in quality, quantity, and dependability for the proposed use. 4. The mobile home shall not be located on the property until such time that the building permit has been issued and conditions 1, 2, and 3 have been complied with. B ian A, G ubb current Planner °C 08n1 i Y. .. r nu \,„ 1ROMballig1/4 r.: U ‘ mu �'. F N w •• 1Q 1 WIi a. � a' 0 a w w I r'\ ' -'- S.conA _ _ _ - IN • raalararaa e .a , r . �� • I Inn , L®�' p• UPI" I AAAAe. I* ( UP , 1 ,a• NaN1 I . . - . jil: \ 1 ' t MUM ..I r I 31 \ ' I 1I /Q''wa. - a IMII ion a OrtCrwa Nin M 1-, • ) . v\��' as I . ' a• •�" .. :id. !I .,:1.. seal n •`• a• a•' !� - - - Iri iis ,...........we INI 0111 awe:•. .,,,, • .3 . ' • V 4: 14. .S ' a -a - ; ' i : • it • • l ilkilln• • „ �, C _ . = big • -. �- - Mgr _ mri %.:• •'I • f, _ _ _ 1 ,.r' 1 ef�: •1 w •:�SW „_ �64, �: }, sid ee� r �_^"� s.ureri a. 1 1 a.'14SIi•f`I1 re .e=10 I. • \• gnetlrrr �..-a�31.1.3•.a, 1at ..-.10. \� t � ..a Ill W . ^ �i Mrs=•Sri • • •1 arlir_ ?.. 1 .. \ etz .\.S • a ., II - li :Algae ": :: i ing. c is i trAi.gi ! .. .. .... . ,....„ . .., _t__. i :c • 4 kEl.tag"' IIIIIIII 1 •ti•wa -• •e•tr al r ' _ I �• \I llyt[i1NE 0• R// ® w i Is. li so : I M.dRu:it411 •r0.P lair••• io g, Illi eF•1/'`.�.-', '�_- 2 '�` �Fea .w�� •• n awl fl „fit. �,i..� rte. 'vi ii .,�. IP1 w� E isli Q I; I . •tog �, lid airy i, i \\\ / / (48:"\‘ ,\ III \ `\A.'\.' I\��1 J N/. emnrek \ r \ . VA 1 I ) / ''-7, _ii\ 1 \ -11- - -)---1411-:_/1\t;:i:i:41 I:I ill i'II 1v 1\\ \ \ I \ C 2 _ _ \\1c \;:k.\,.\,‘,1/4 ii‘_„,,_\-V6.;_,./t‘___r.0\.,\1:_\.,,::\\6\.\.\,,i,\‘la-__1,,.t\\i,n1,",n‘,:1,e,\/\\.(,\,\\1),)_\:.://oiLTT,cr.I"ti‘,‘‘,•=iiiit,L\,,,i,4.ill)720..Pt:,:\,,./‘,4I i il i.i..:19"..,\\,K,,,/\al.‘.,J,J\‘'Nos,----,....1-.,\‘,7\'--_j_‘‘\\).1\\----\--\$,‘,....7-,_--$-)-:\-1--1-\,\//.. I'met--iiibtl\iNi......\((\,‘Iw.\\/;‘,\\\,'''.'',-ii,',,l;iii\i/:I 2\:'•1,1j'\\/(\l/"It I/.\/'\_/,.,11.,:p2 1)-iiti\ii, \ \ r 6 K.H:..,6,7,\a 0 V N. 1 1 � v � '� � _ 7.6 \ / in\ ,,2 ' 1;\ \ \ \ ,\k if Ni i\,(,:rc\\ ....,,, iii i - ii‘ \ id II I • :;::: •II- � .". • h �� f�. ry ,N•.ii r� \ / I. ♦ lk r ;: ,i is — a, . / li '11 _311 „1.., ,, 1 � oil .iir.n • , u y� � 1•� � 14 ii l l�i 1:1‘.• I 'J . 4. 1 L. y �._.A� � � ` 1.. Ilil!li'vl�1 Ir. I I I n. I•V- Vii .•I I'�II� JI: • I I t 1 1 \ I I 2 C, n V � I II �., t I�i , \�� \ �s. \ \ i, \ , • /1 1IcZ\ ', i 1 \ `�\ _ r c ...,) c)\•1‘.\\:\c,,\:._ "\:\ ii / N, / �� 1 ..., i, ��Z \ \ 9 C 0 8n.4 I 6 9zu, \ ),, cI iae �� (1-; A. 2 \ I II • ,4t., `,-. w-4" - "'•.. . ..n... .- �'r=o�r3a'"'ti.: �R.. ^ar�way}prr "�r � ..",:7'l' 1..tr k x k An # •: s...r — _. &nfir Of. ._ E t "l Yom^ a !F , Y ✓ 171RNA 49,4 `w ^ kl ;w y jam,.,[ .. r. ~4, V` O .�., . Y �� ,_• w. . ,„..4 .,, . .eztis r. µ ate` ��^ - r 0/ ar 'bA! e `9• „ �.�wPIS 1" fh • rR✓//ice-'l",- ��.4`�!"' ._..K, •. _ �`++•.. a.q• .. r'Y 44,44., ' 4 . �'+r'�4 ',t...sir _ ni Y �// _0 , . - - 11:-;1:, - liv: OP d/a 5'T�PEE-1....., ,-,..,:,- ` 1 Y5 r ` . Tat /. ' �� -, - .rf� •/ +!'Y',\�1 d. ' ti)t r�wr �. r+ - • n .tµ +,�, .� �F^t �f' �,' d° f _ 3 .� ,,, � 'y-,�� ,mss „- • � <. _ 1� FIELD CHECK FILING NUMBER: ZPMH-1681 DATE OF INSPECTION: August 8, 1990 NAME: Gale Miller REQUEST: Mobile Home Zoning Permit for a principal dwelling LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 30 and 31. East Side Addition Eaton, Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: East and adjacent to Wall Street and 100 feet, more or less, south of 5th Street, Eaton LAND USE: N Church and residential E Residential S Residential W Residential and commercial ZONING: N Agricultural E Industrial S Industrial W Industrial and Commercial COMMENTS: There are no improvements on the property and no existing access. The east end of the lot is bordered by an alley. BY: XILX:0'.evl (l Brian A. Grubb Current Planner ✓C 0821 WELD COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES ZONING PERMIT ^, 915 10th Street MOBILE ROME Greeley, Colorado 80631 Phone 356-4000 Ext. 4400 IMPORTANT - Complete all items on both sides. Mark boxes where applicable. y APPLICANT 60, (i Y � 14 it PHONE 1/ -E(34)5.-,. OWNER ( 1 �/�22 kla ct ri ho ► l e Z-,. PRONE q.J `( > -,?- ADDRESS ` PO 6x 5-q(c CITY - STATE - ZIP 9 a ryi covo lepis e4.5 f,�LOC .�SUBDIVtLg N>a Za,,„ LEGAL DESCRIPTION 7 7r/ ( 0� /' J 1 J c Section. , T N, R W. Total Acreage Application for zoning permit is made for: Staff Approval Board of County Commissioners Approval ❑ Temporary Use During Construction ❑ Use Beyond 18 months During Construction of a residence of a residence ❑ Temporary Storage ❑ Extension Beyond 6 months for Temporary Storage ❑ Accessory to Farm ❑ More than one MH as Accessory to Farm ❑ Accessory Use as an Office ❑ More than one MR as Accessory Use as [i Accessory Use in C or I Zone District an Office - ❑ More than one MR as Accessory Use in El Accessory Structure C._or I._Zone District .,,__. _ ._ . .- _.__. - ❑. Temporary_Use._during.,Medical Hardship.. ❑ More than one accessory structure E_Principal..Dwelling The above requires an Application fee of The above requires an Application fee of • SI00.00 $150.00 C----7.773� -_ TYPE-OF-SEWAGE-DISPOSAL __ . . .. _.. _..__•TYPE-Op-WATER-SUPPLY'A � - 'rte ?• S`2J �❑p Public or private company: .pp. �./../_, .O-Public or private-co (: �'( . .-.� fil T� Septic Tank - Permit # '6 pD CO 77 ❑ Individual (well. cistern.)- n� / v ., T� �{7 Well Permit # _ Copy Attached: "Yes W7 No O Copy Attached: Yes D Nor t o DEPARTMENT OFPLANNING SERVICES USE ONLY - _ -- - ZONING DISTRICT._. a7n-144 PG 4.,/ APPLICATION FEE PA _ RECEIPT NUMBET; DA CHAINDF.RED APPROVED BY: ❑ Staff O Board of County Commissioners Hearing Date ISSUED BY: DATE, MOBILE HOME BUILDING PEWAIT NUMBER DATE ISSUEDyC0 e4 • A sketch plan is required as part of the_applieation_review. Please_attach, a sketch.plan. of the site at the scale on one inch represents fifty feet or other suitable scale to show the proposed location of the mobile home _including_ distances from the.-property_ lines_,sod___ other structures on the-property; access to the mobile home, indicating whether the access is existing or proposed; location and measurements of any easements or rightrof-yays;-_ and "any"existing—structures "on`the property. "'Sketch—P an attached: Yeskft" ;No,[T Deed or contract attached: Yes No O �p What housing is available on the property. and what• is: its present use? 1U0'vkk • _ _._ How many mobile homes are on ;this property at the present time? /00-14A-- TEMPORARY USE DURING CONSTRUCTION OF A RESIDENCE Buildxn it Number Date Building Permit Issued - Zoning Permit valid onths from date of issue. Zoning Permit issued from /to RENEWALS: FIRST - From to Fee: Reviewed & Approved SECOND-From to Fee: Reviewed & Approved ACCESSORY FARM USE of farming operation on property: Number of Live k.�__ -Average number per year __.. -Acres Irrigated Acres .Dry an —�,�Acrees Pasture Number• of employees now emplveda _. _py11,-_time _ — -Part ACCF�peSSORY .USE IN C OR I ZONE DISTRICT ` Ty oRf cossiezcial or industrial activity on property: Number of employees: 11 time: Part time: Mobile home' will 'be used Lir. rIGNATURE OF APPLICANT L�CATION_.D BUILAINC PERMITS-ARE REQ RED FOR ALL MOBILE HOMES IN ADDITION TO THE ZONING PERMIT FOR MOBILE HOMES. THE BUILDING PERMIT MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE BUILDING INSPECTION DIVISION, ROOM_342, .CENTEMNIAL. CENTER,- 915 10th-STREET,-._CREELEY, COLORADO 80631, .PHONE-356-4000 EXT. 4425, AFTER APPROVAL OF THE ZONING PERMIT. _... - 1 • Sf- • • CS • - q f 1 1 i i --.__..__ CT- • - __ - (9-L- - --- - "F- �-- - �- _ �.�-�lL_Cam. _ _ _ _----._�'w`3 .__G`�"`- 4-o-_ 1- ___ . - _-. __ __- _. , -• -- _ _ --- ��,x_ - - U AA21560h6 B 1210 AEC 02156066 09/19/88 15,1• $3.00 1/001 P 0219 VARY ANN FEVERST£IN CLERK s RECORDER MELD CO, CO Knots; all Oita bo !liege 3iTrestnts, rho I.....G6.1.4- 0HL7 51-.1, __ __ whom*Weaiw__£.D.....Box..S96..._Sators-6A61i.__.___._.__ --- — Meld Colorado County of--1......._._._._ Ana State o4_..,...-_-.._.-__.--._ __--__fae der oosidesdoaofother good and valuable consideration and TEN and NO/lot_a-1i la hand pad,busby 04(0 and ooavey(e)t0.__JVI.:AN COM7...�... - wilicso wasis___.P.O. 80a Son Poton 8061S � - C.oanty of--.—X920,_............._.._. ...._...___and the wte of colorado the Otilowlea cwt property to the County of 1�ICld_...._._._..___._.__._.wd>lastr of Colu•Eo. to•wttt Lots Thirty (30) and Thirty-one (31), in block Four (4) in the EAST ! SIDE ADDITION, to the Town of Eaton, County of Meld. State of Coloradot according to the recorded plat thereof. I wttl an Ite appurtenances and waenetW the title to the e.M subject m--S•�4J�R.—0 t lace tn" duund.Daranin In 10169 Are ■ublecf -t0 na.a nr ?mat recorded April 26, 1988 in Book llyandar Rec. 02199026 Weld Co. Reeords. goad this /9------day ar arms Sentemhar A.D.is-11 1 lathe hewn of bass - ... O�eal+F.,"1/24.,:t. f' ITATDTOST AO�GttOwLmOXat " oYq x` arm or ooLOIIADO. T:•;',;,rAY P Countyof.,..M.ld • i The eatpleetreneasatw eclatsa dra beenw thla , N ..BCIC.,., — deser w.r .101— 4 . . i....41.4C e G,Gal. ..e Miller -0�.Or � ttAt♦sm ev butd and � 4 ` . >q tlnfoa 1 y "' - ]]besau,ty,y h,hle • 7aar4,arter musseMsass lermts se ronantamMorecsaeafea 4+. A L=IllNIa11M MR We warwwsaeYvawnsa..w w•sawsmwaaaw��`v -1 . • • • _ -s . - -- - - -- -- _ _ .=.-- - _. _ �� _ - moo_,-�__--��2.� f ---40---;; - —• �o-IK1Ceep�' _-- --iv i •--_-- n ....4' ' Xh INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT NO. G-830078 WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT NEW PERMIT ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES 1 :' i6 HOSPITAL ROAD . GREELEY , CO 80639 .35111" 353--0035 EXT.2225 ADDRESS P.O. 596 PH (303) 45A '55 OWNER GOMCZ , GALE EATON: - CO. 8k1655- ...b ° ` „ - ADDRESS OF PROPOSED SYSTEM WAhL. .SYRF_ET-Y{ESIDE CHURCH EATON CO 80655 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SITE : NE4 SW4 SEC 39 TWP 7 RNG'65' `- '" SUBDIVISION: EAST EATON LOT 3 BLOCK 4 FILING% 0 } ^ � USE TYPE: RESIDENTIAL MOBILCI-IOME + � sc.,,.;';? y11:IV:f.CES PERSONS 4 BATHROOMS' 2.00 LOT SIZE. 96 ACRES T• r� BEDROOMS 3 Y�ASI_MENT PLUMBING NO WA7CF SUPPLY EA70N ' _ ' APPLICATION FEE 0950.00 ;."C ' D BY RECEPTIONIST AID SIGNED BY -GALL-GOMEZ___rt.._,,:r - DATE 04/22/88 DATE -04/2,2/88_..-_.. . ,;. '+ PERCOLATION R TE _/../k5mIN PER INCH LIMITING ZONE 7S-REEM -- ± �--- ..--•- c., 2'..• ':i.'IL TYl E $,trYcb/a PERCENT GROUND SLOPE Q Z.---DIREGT•ION _--^':». -.r-• :::RM THE APPLICAT DESIGN _ATI :::ROM THE APPLICATION INFORMATION SUPPLIED AND THE AN=S2'1'E--St?iLr'ERCflrA+IOtS,rDATA. . THE roLLOWING MINIMUM INSTALLATION SPECIFICATIONS .A�-RECUIREDT . i l SEPTIC 'TANK ,[4.0..0 GALLONS ABSOf;F'TION TRCTICnQt'S rir. ABSORPTION BED"--•-.e4.;95.SW. r t •r' ""'- , r IN ADDITION. THIS F'ERM:fT 7:5 SUBJECT 7O i'" c0417.0adtt1r-. AribS..,.. e1L-TEF'M` L9t1*;. ;0i4D 1. { .EONS .r_ —r / •, -. .• ..... r 1 _. MtS PERMIT IS uRANTED TEMF'1KARILY TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION .TO-.COMMENr 4 TH $ PER 1 ,w,^,Y Sidi:: REVOKED 01; SUSPENDED BY THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH- DERARXMEN.LF� •' �� S,SET FORTH IN TH: WELD COUNTY INDIVIDUAL -SEWAGE DISPOSAL--�SYST.EMAREGULA ' ' kIDING' FAILURE TO MEET ANY TERM OR CONDITION IMPOSED 'THEREON-•DURING-TEAPORAfiI-OR4INAL.-.i ' APPROVAL. THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ASSUMPTION BY TIE ` J`t DEPARTMENT OR ITS EP L O �. ES o LIABILITY FOR THE FAILURE OR IWADEQ0ACY" Or,THE', ,,: 2 ..WAGI: DISPOSAL SYSTEM +Pl ea l�[ tegai �; y c. •Vo tant, S--ao 88 Zc. � `��'"4 ZQ/ tam)? . 5-a-oa &i.C. QQ_��QQ-�� yv - `r AS THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE AND SHALL BECOME/VOID-7SriP,. .'trk� OF NOT COMMENCED WITHIN tJ�dE YEAR OF ITS ISSUANCE. :BEFORE THIS PERMIT THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT : O IMPOSE ADDI-: TT.ONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS REQUIRED TO MEETOUR' REGULATIONSON :. g.is. FINAL PERMIT APPROVAL IS CONTINE,ENT UPON THE FINAL INSPECTION OF•'HE;COMAH P>LETED SYSTEM BY THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT.` ,, Zi SCO8�1 WCHD-EHS MAY . 1984 '• ` tDEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE(303)356-4000,EXT.4400 9151M65TREtT GREELEY,COLORADO 80637 • COLORADO August 9, 1990 Gale Miller P.O. Box 596 Eaton, CO 80615 Subject: ZPY2-1681 - Request for a zoning permit for a mobile home to be used as a principal &ailing on a parcel of land described as Lots 30 and 31, Block 4, Fast Side Addition of Eaton, Weld County, Colorado. Dear Ms. Miller: I have scheduled a neeting with the Board of County Commissioners on Wednesday, September 5, 1990, at 9:00 a.m. to consider your application. This meeting will take place in the County Commissioners' Hearing Room, first flour, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, • Colorado. It is rec«wT+ded that you or a representative be in attendance to answer any questions the Board of County Commissioners might have with respect to your application. The Department of Planning Services' staff will take a recommendation concerning this application to the Board oz County Commissioners. It is the responsibility of the applicant to call the Department of Planning Services' office a few days before the date of the Commissioners' hearing to obtain the recommendation. It is the responsibility o£ an applicant to see that a sign is posted on the property under consideration at least 10 days preceding the hearing date. Sometime prior to August 24, 1990, you or a representative should call me to obtain a sign to be posted on the site no later than August 26, 1990. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to call tee. Respectfully, ZAA/(1 Brian A. Grubb Current Planner QQrt�o e ! AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS SURFACE ESTATE Application No. Subject Property STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. COUNTY OF WELD ) THE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn, states that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names, addresses and the corresponding Parcel Identification Number assigned by the Weld County Assessor of the owners of property (the surface estate) within five hundred (SOO) feet of the property subject to the application. This list was compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor, or an ownership update from a title or abstract company or attorney, derived from such records, or from the reeords of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. The list compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor shall have been assemhte.4 within thirty (30) days of the application submission date. .!Pe x-C?tc4-ef Sernta '1; n U Q 1.‘c/Z yj The fgf18bing instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me this 7 -- ' egg-day or �u a a , 19�. WITNESS my hand and official seal. My Commission expires: My Cowmiwioe Ewen Feb. 13. 1993 ,�,�,� nQ�,A N Lary Public F-4208,1 CERTIFICATE OP MAILING i I hereby certify that I have placed a true and correct copy of the surrounding property owners and owners and lessees of minerals in accordance with the notification requirements o£ Weld County in Case Number ZFMB-1681 for Gale Miller in the United States Mail. postage prepaid First Class Mail by postal card as addressed on the attached list. this 20th day of August. 1990. 477 TO: SURROUNDING PAY OWNERS The Weld County Board of County Commissioners will hold a public hearing on Wflinecday September 5, 1990. at 9:00 a.m. in the County Commissioners' Hearing Room, first floor, Weld County CenrPn+iAl Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley. Colorado, conrnTn ng the request of: CASE NUMBER: ZPMH-1681 APPLICANT: Gale Miller REQUEST: Zoning permit for a mobile home to be used as a principal gelling. LEGAL: Tats 30 and 31, Block 4, East Side Addition of Eaton, Weld Canty, Colorado LOCATION: East of Wall Street, between 4th and 5th Streets. For more information call Briaa A. Grubb, Current Planner. WEIR COUNTY DEPART kNT OF PLANNING SERVICES 915 10th Street - Roan 342 Greeley, CO 80631 Phone 356-4000, at. 4400 49eGa i MAILING LIST Gale Miller ZPMN-1681 Bill McCoon 200 Josephine Street Denver. CO 80206 Lupe Guitteraz P.O. Box 593 Eaton. CO 80615 Christina De La Torre 2507 14th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Antonio Rosales P.O. Box 646 Eaton, CO 80615 Eaton Community Center Foundation 403 Wall Street Eaton, CO 80615 June Rosalez P.O. Box 646 Eaton. CO 80615 Margaret Lucero 2185 West Byers Denver, CO 80223 Lucy Tapes 2449 Ash Avenue, 0125 Eaton. CO 80615 Jessie Valdez 524 London Street San Francisco, CA 94112 International Church of 4-Square Gospel 443 Linden Eaton. CO 80615 Paul Gomez 454 Linden Street Eaton, CO 80615 SC0501. MAILING LIST Gale Miller ZPMB-1681 Page 2 Joe Aeala General Delivery Eaton. CO 80615 Amado Yanes P.O. Box 843 Eaton, CO 80615 Tony De La Torre 1000 South Fulton Avenue Monterey Park, CA 91754 Betty Gallegos P.O. Box 623 Eaton, CO 80615 Marie Gallegos P.O. Box 472 Eaton. CO 80615 Sharron Lewis 3239 Bruce Randolph Avenue Denver, CO 80205 Angelo la Guardia 154 East 4th Street Eaton. CO 80615 Charles Redin P.O. Box 1142 Eaton, CO 80615 Louis Archuleta P.O. Box 843 Eaton, CO 80615 Rosie Rodriquez P.O. Box 857 Eaton. CO 80615 William Kann 18709 Weld County Road 74 Eaton. CO 80615 MAILING LIST Gale Miller 2PMH-1681 Page 3 Ruben and Geneva Martinez P.O. Box 132 Eaton, CO 80615 Henry Luna P.O. Box 684 Eaton, CO 80615 Roselle Rucobo 1306 8th Street Eaton, CO 80615 Max Martinez P.O. Box 2007 Eaton. CO 80615 Abe Archibeque P.O. Box 594 Eaton, CO 80615 Benji Archibeque P.O. Box 594 Eaton, CO 80615 Marcella Morado 424 Clark Street Eaton, CO 80615 Frank and Betty Gallegos Box 623 Eaton, CO 80615 Betty Gallegos Box 623 Eaton, CO 80615 Sarah Harper 311 East 47th Place Los Angeles, CA 90011 Lucy Rosales P.O. Box 646 Eaton. CO 80615 v COS'n t MAILING LIST Gale Miller ZPMH-1681 Page 4 Sam Morado P.O. Box 556 Eaton, CO 80615 Alva Morado P.O. Box 556 Eaton, CO 80615 Victor Marquez P.O. Box 577 Eaton, CO 80615 Paul Hernandez P.O. Box 689 Eaton, CO 80615 Richard Martinez P.O. Box 659 Eaton, CO 80615 Barbara Gustafson 35395 Weld County Road 37 Eaton, CO 80615 gete l— RESOLUTION RE: DECLARE CERTAIN EQUIPMENT AS SURPLUS PROPERTY WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, State Statute and the Weld County Administrative Manual require that all items disposed of be declared surplus by the Board of County Commissioners, and WHEREAS, the County has determined that certain equipment, as described in Schedule A, a copy o£ which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, is no longer required for County use. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that certain equipment, as described in Schedule A, be, and hereby is, declared as surplus. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that the sale of said equipment at Denver Auto Auction be, and hereby is, authorized. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 10th day of September, A.D. , 1990. BOA OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST:Ay111/91a , WE OUNTY COLORADO Weld County Clerk to the Board Ate Gene R. Bran ner, Chairman \ �If -�--�- — BY: \l (ryjc ric c c - id_k_x_y,2 Geo qe Kennedy, Pro-TemD7puty Clerk to t Board Sr APPROVED AS TO FORM: �anccee H r ert 6 C.W. r J County Attorney Gor Ki c // / 900807 PNCD, CG r, 4or: �K SCHEDULE A ASSET # VIN # DESCRIPTION 15040013 1C1AW19RXG6240893 1986 CHEVROLET CELEBRITY 15040014 1G1AW19R6G6240387 1986 CHEVROLET CELEBRITY 15040101 1FABP43F4DZ149076 1983 FORD LTD CROWN VICTORIA yC C'S^7 RESOLUTION RE: CANCELLATION OF OUTSTANDING ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE FOR THE WELD COUNTY AMBULANCE SERVICE WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, a list of ambulance accounts has been submitted to the Accounting Department of Weld County, Colorado, with said accounts having been deemed uncollectible in accordance with guidelines adopted by the City and County, a copy of said list being attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and WHEREAS, the Accounting Department has recommended to the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that said list of uncollectible debts due and owing the Weld County Ambulance Service in the amount of $27,287.08, be canceled. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the aforementioned list of uncollectible accounts in the amount of $27,287.08, be, and hereby is, approved for cancellation. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 10th day of September, A.D. , 1990. nn BO F COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: 1 / il/ izet WEL UNTY, COLORADO //CCCCCCIIIIII Weld County Clerk to the Board ene R. Brantner, Chairman J ;xc /t a.��•�-�1/ ge Kennedy, Pro-Tem eputy Clerk to the Board APPROVED AS TO FORM: Constance L. Harbert C.W. TC' County Attorney Got . 900808 i AM coo l 0c : 4-G-- �r�d ) aµ AUGUST 312 1990 MR• DON WARDEN FINANCE DIRECTOR WELD COUNTY GREELEY• COLORADO 80631 DEAR MR•WARDEN• ATTACHED IS A LISTING OF THOSE AMBULANCE ACCOUNTS WHICH HAVE aEEN DEEMED UNCOLLECTADLE• PLEASE PRESENT THESE TO THE BOARD FOR THEIR APPROVAL TO WRITE THEM OFF• CO DIALLY• A"An � " Y M CABE2 DIRECTOR WELD LINTY AMBULANCE SERVICE 900808 WELD COUNTY AMBULANCE SERVICE - UNCOLLECTABLE ACCOUNTS PAGE ACCOUNT - AMOUNT ACCOUNT AMOUNT ACCOUNT AMOUNT NUMBER DUE NUMBER DUE NUMBER DUE 00008862 5327.17 00009770 $55.20 00010054 $205.54 00012558 $308.01 00013768 $407.33 00013830 $154.75 00014174 $160.62 00014637 *119.54 00014724 $483.08 00014725 318255.58 0001494.1 179.14 00015190 S96604 00015404 $29.61 00015443 $500.58 00015446 *323.42 00015454 $18178.32 00015462 5769.42 00015465 $493.38 00015478 $561.36 00015492 5463.50 00015493 *517.06 00015495 $466.90 00015504 3318.71 00015513 $464.87 00015522 5378.02 00015530 5408.92 00015546 *391.40 00015549 5476.20 00015554 1391.40 00015555 $532.00 00015576 $412.00 00015597 3452.18 00015607 $290.46 00015619 $323.42 00015690 $403.80 00015718 $389.34 00015719 $412.00 00015720 $344.02 00015724 3378.02 00015726 $344.02 00015727 $378.02 00015732 $344.02 00015741 $391.40 00015742 $357.42 00015743 $381.10 00015753 3323.42 00015823 $158.34 00015887 $227.36 00015947 $439.50 00015970 5318.71 00016001 $412.09 00016015 $324.00 00016018 $314.00 00016032 $173.00 00016086 $170.35 00016088 3507.00 00016090 3134.00 00016093 $505.00 00016265 $347.00 00016351 3314.00 00016358 3334.00 00016392 $507.00 00016400 3562.00 00016402 5430.00 00016472 3314.00 00016513 3206.00 00016576 3314.00 00016587 3604.00 00016589 3456.00 00016624 3420.00 00016689 3324.00 00016709 $430.00 • TOTAL 3278287.09 aeOrS RESOLUTION RE: APPROVE CANCELLATION OF GENERAL FUND WARRANTS WHEREAS, the Board o£ County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, certain General Fund Warrants in the total amount of $18,197.79, have been issued in error or the amounts for which they were drawn have otherwise been changed, and WHEREAS, a list of the specific Warrant numbers, dates, names and amounts is on file with the Accounting Department, and WHEREAS, the Board deems it advisable to approve the cancellation of said warrants. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that those General Fund Warrants for the month of August, 1990, in the amount of $18,197.79, be, and the same hereby are, cancelled and held for naught. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 10th day of September, A.D. , 1990. / BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: L4/ WEL LINTY, COLORADO DY!lLi, Weld County Clerk to the Board 0/2/Sra galfrt* gene R. ntner, Chairman ri _74,\-tryft- c4r,% �r,(«aJ Ge g�y, Pro-Tem Deputy Clerk to the Board ,�/, . =,� APPRO D AS TO FORM: onst�L_ H�� C.W. Kirb County Attorney Gored 900809 d(2°°/ . ti_e ea• t, MEMORAIMUM wine To CLERK ID THE BOARD on, SEPTEmPER 5, 1990 COLORADO From ACCOUIVING DEPARTMENT Tf suei.ot: AMOUNTS PAYABLE CMIERAL MID WARM= MR THE MONTH WILL YOU PLEASE ENTER A RESOLUTION FOR THE FOLLOW= WARRANT CANC1M.LATIONS MR GENERAL FUND; MR THE NDNTH OF AUGUST IN THE ANDUNT OF .$18;197.79 THANK YOU, a�TDRE 1- v 900809 RESOLUTION RE: AUTHORIZATION FOR THE WELD COUNTY ATTORNEY TO PROCEED WITH LEGAL ACTION AGAINST CERTAIN PARTIES FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE WELD COUNTY BUILDING CODE ORDINANCE WHEREAS, the Board o£ County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Weld County Department of Planning Services has referred certain violations of the Weld County Building Code Ordinance to the County Attorney's Office, and WHEREAS, those persons in violation of the Weld County Building Code Ordinance are Carolyn O. Anderson; Robert S. Slavin; Florence Straight and Gerald A. Straight; and Ron Richardson, and WHEREAS, despite efforts by the Planning staff to resolve said matters, the violations have not been corrected, and WHEREAS, the Board deems it necessary to bring legal action against those individuals as hereinabove named to correct said violations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that Thomas O. David, Weld County Attorney, be, and hereby is, authorized to proceed with legal action against Carolyn O. Anderson; Robert S. Slavin; Florence Straight and Gerald A. Straight; and Ron Richardson to remedy the violations of the Weld County Building Code Ordinance and the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, and any other persons occupying the properties, any persons claiming an interest in the properties, and any persons acting in active concert with the identified parties. 900810 mil_ f .� % "`- ;� •"/ C//� Di} C ) Page 2 RE: BUILDING CODE VIOLATIONS The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 10th day of September, A.D. , 1990. BOARD F COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: �0�eil 4d/it wEL Y, COLORADO Weld County Clerk to the Board -Aft,R. Bran er, C rman / \ yeputy Clerk to the Board APPROVED AS TO FORM: Constance . Ha a CC.W. Ki County Attorffey L 900810 lost' MEMORAnDUM WilkTo Board of County Commissioners oat, August 31, 1990 COLORADO From Department of Planning Services sub**, Legal Action Authorization The Department o£ Planning Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners authorize the Weld County Attorney to proceed with legal • action against the following parties for violations of the weld County Building Code Ordinance. Building Code Ordinance violations: BCV-1482 • Carolyn O. Anderson 5 Dos Rios Greeley, CO 80634 The Department of Planning also recommends that the County Attorney be authorized to proceed with legal action against any other persons occupying the properties, any persons claiming an interest in the properties, and any persons acting in active concert with the identified parties. Copies of the violation materials are available at the Department of Planning Services' office or the Weld County Attorney's office. 900810 Aostt, fflEil1ORAnDU(n 1111111€ To Board of County Commissioners once September 5, 1990 COLORADO From Department of Planning Services suu)an; Legal Action Authorization The Department of Planning Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners authorize the Weld County Attorney to proceed with legal action against the following parties for violations of the Weld County Building Code Ordinance. Building Code Ordinance Violations: BCV^1514 Robert S. Slavin 589 Weld County Road 7 Erie, CO 80516 BCV-1146 BCV-1146 Florence Straight Gerald A. Straight 439 26th Avenue Court 439 26th Avenue Court Greeley, CO 80631 Greeley, CO 80631 The Department of Planning also recommends that the County Attorney be authorized to proceed with legal action against any other persons occupying the properties, any persons claiming an interest in the properties, and any persons acting in active concert with the identified parties. Copies of the violation materials are available at the Department of Planning Services' office or the Weld County Attorney's office. .,COST 0 flot‘v MEMORAnDum 7o Board of County Commissioners Daft September 4, 1990 COLORADO From Department of Planning Services s000m Legal Action Authorization The Department of Planning Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners authorize the Weld County Attorney to proceed with legal • action against the following parties for violations of the Weld County Building Code Ordinance and the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. Building Code Ordinance Violations: BCV-1513 Ron Richardson 1321 E. 20th Street Greeley, CO 60631 The Department of Planning also recommends that the County Attorney be authorized to proceed with legal action against any other persons occupying the properties, any persons claiming an interest in the properties, and any persons acting in active concert with the identified parties. Copies of the violation materials are available at the Department of Planning Services' office or the Weld County Attorney's office. v� oN �L • °�90 ORDINANCE NO. 77-C IN THE MATTER OF THE REPEAL AND RE-ENACTMENT WITH AMENDMENTS OF ORDINANCE NO. 77-B, AMBULANCE SERVICES RULES AND REGULATIONS BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY, COLORADO: WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of the County o£ Weld, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado Statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, pursuant to the recently modified Colorado Emergency Medical Services Act Rules and pursuant to the recommendation of the Department of Health, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, deems it advisable to amend the Ambulance Services Rules and Regulations Ordinance to include the role of the Emergency Medical Technician, Intermediate (EMT-I) , and to otherwise update the general wording to coincide with that of the current Emergency Medical Services Acts, C.R.S. , 25-3.5-101, et seq. , as amended, and WHEREAS, said Act requires that the Board of County Commissioners of each county adopt certain standards, requirements and procedures for providing emergency medical services within each county, and WHEREAS, said Act authorizes the Board of County Commissioners of each county to license and regulate ambulances, and ambulance services, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of the County of Weld deems it in the best interest of the citizens of said County to adopt the following Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that Ordinance No. 77-B previously enacted be, and hereby is, repealed and re-enacted with amendments as follows: _Section 1 - Purpose 1 . 1 The purpose of these Rules and Regulations is to set forth the requirements for the planning and implementing of high quality emergency medical services to all citizens of Weld County. It is the intent of the Board of County Commissioners that the emergency medical service in Weld County will consist of at least transportation, treatment, communications, training and • PAGE 2 RE: AMBULANCE SERVICES RULES AND REGULATIONS documentation systems designed to prevent premature mortality and to reduce the morbidity that may arise from critical injuries, exposure to poisonous substances, and illnesses. 1 .2 - Delegation The Board of Weld County Commissioners designates and delegates to the Director and the Director' s designees the authority to manage the Ambulance Services Rules and Regulations. Under the direction of the Board, inspections, licenses, permits, applications, and other functions necessary to implement these Rules and Regulations shall be the responsibility of the Director and the Director' s designees. The Director shall be authorized to promulgate and enforce such rules and regulations for the operation and licensing of ambulance services in Weld County as the Director deems necessary to provide for quality emergency medical services and to insure compliance with Colorado law and any resolution adopted by the Board. Section 2 - Definitions 2.1 The following definitions shall apply in the interpretation and enforcement of these Rules and Regulations: • 2 .1-1 "Advanced Life Support Ambulance" means an ambulance which, in addition to meeting the basic requirements for equipment, has on board the equipment and medications required by the Physician Advisor's protocol, and which operates with advanced life support personnel. 2.1-2 "Advanced Life Support Personnel" means a minimum of one state certified Emergency Medical Technician- Paramedic/EMT-P or Emergency Medical Technician- Intermediate/EMT-I or registered nurse with advanced cardiac life support certification, or a physician with advanced cardiac life support certification, and a driver with a valid Colorado Driver's License and current Colorado state certified Emergency Medical Technician-Basic/EMT-B certification. PAGE 3 RE: AMBULANCE SERVICES RULES AND REGULATIONS 2. 1-3 "Ambulance" means any privately or publicly owned land vehicle especially constructed or modified and equipped, intended to be used and maintained or operated by an ambulance service for the transportation upon the streets and highways in this County, of individuals who are sick, injured, or otherwise incapacitated or helpless. 2.1-4 "Ambulance Driver" means any person authorized to drive an ambulance, which is a land vehicle, in this County as provided in these Rules and Regulations. 2.1-5 "Ambulance Service" means the furnishing, operating, conducting, maintaining, advertising, or otherwise engaging in or professing to be engaged in the transportation of patients by ambulance. Taken in context, it also means the person so engaged or professing to be engaged. The person so engaged and the vehicles used for the emergency transportation o£ persons injured at a mine are excluded from this definition when the personnel utilized in the operation of said vehicles are subject to the mandatory safety standards of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Administration, or its successor agency. 2. 1-6 "Ambulance Service License" shall mean a nonexclusive authorization issued by the Board of County Commissioners to operate an ambulance service, publicly or privately within Weld County; the license shall issue only to Ambulance Services whose primary base of operation is located in Weld County. 2. 1-7 "Ambulance Vehicle Permit" shall mean the authorization issued by the Department with respect to an ambulance used or to be used to provide ambulance service in Weld County. 2. 1-8 "Applicant" shall mean that person who is an initial applicant or an applicant for renewal for an ambulance service license, or ambulance vehicle permit. 2. 1-9 "Basic Life Support Ambulance" means an ambulance that meets the requirements for equipment as established by the Board and is manned by at least one Emergency Medical Technician-Basic/EMT-B currently certified by the State of Colorado, and a driver that as a minimum i PAGE 4 RE: AMBULANCE SERVICES RULES AND REGULATIONS has a current American Red Cross Advanced First Aid Card, a Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Card, or the equivalent of both as established by the State Advisory Council on Emergency Medical Services, and a valid Colorado Driver' s License. 2.1-10 "Board" shall mean the Board o£ County Commissioners of Weld County. 2.1-11 "County" shall mean Weld County, Colorado. 2. 1-12 "Current E.M.S. Act" shall mean the Emergency Medical Services Act, C.R.S. , 25-3.5-101 et seq. , as amended. 2.1-13 "Department" shall mean the Weld County Health Department. 2.1-14 "Director" shall mean the Medical Director of Weld County Health Department. 2.1-15 "Emergency" means any actual or self-perceived event which threatens life, limb, or well-being of an individual in such a manner that a need for immediate medical care is created. 2.1-16 "Emergency Medical Technician (EMT) " means an individual who holds a valid Emergency Medical Technician certificate issued by the Colorado Department of Health. 2. 1-16a "Emergency Medical Technician-Basic (EMT-B) " means an individual who has been duly certified by the Emergency Medical Services Division of the Colorado Department of Health, and who is authorized to provide basic emergency medical care in accordance with the acts allowed by the Colorado State Board of Medical Examiners and the rules of the Colorado Board of Health. 2 . 1-1Gb "Emergency Medical Technician-Intermediate (EMT-I) " means an individual who has been duly certified by the Emergency Medical Services Division of the Colorado Department of Health, and who is authorized to provide emergency medical care in accordance with the acts allowed by the Colorado State Board of Medical Examiners and the Colorado Board of Health. PAGE 5 RE: AMBULANCE SERVICES RULES AND REGULATIONS 2. 1-16c "Paramedic" means an individual who has been duly certified by the Emergency Medical Services Division of the Colorado Department of Health and who is authorized to provide advanced emergency medical care in accordance with the acts allowed by the Colorado State Board of Medical Examiners and the rules of the Colorado Board of Health. 2.1-16d "Emergency Medical Technician Certificate (EMT-B, EMT-I, Paramedic) " shall mean the certificate issued by the Colorado Department of Health as provided in the C.R.S. Emergency Medical Services Act. 2.1-17 "Emergency Standby Service" is a service provided by contract or on a voluntary basis to provide emergency medical services at special events including athletic and competitive events which may pose a potential hazard for injury or death and require immediate emergency medical care. 2.1-18 "First Responder" shall mean an individual who has successfully completed the First Responder Certification Program administered by the Division of Fire Safety pursuant to Section 24-33.5-1201 , et sue. , C.R.S. , and the applicable regulations of the Colorado State Department of Public Safety. 2 . 1-19 "Patient" means any individual who is sick, injured, or otherwise incapacitated or helpless. 2. 1-20 "Physician Advisor" means a physician (M.D. or D.O. ) licensed by the State of Colorado who establishes written protocols for medical acts performed by emergency medical services personnel and who is specifically designated and responsible to assure the competency of the performance of those acts by such personnel within weld County, in accordance with the applicable rules of the Colorado State Board of Medical Examiners and Colorado Department of Health. 2. 1-21 "Rescue Unit" means any organized group chartered by this State as a corporation not for profit or otherwise existing as a non-profit organization whose purpose is the search for and the rescue of lost or injured persons and includes, but is not limited to, such groups as search and rescue, mountain rescue, ski PAGE 6 RE: AMBULANCE SERVICES RULES AND REGULATIONS patrols (either volunteer or professional) , law enforcement posses, civil defense units, or other organizations of governmental designation responsible for search and rescue. Section 3 - Requirements for Licensure of Ambulance Services and Ambulance vehicle Permits 3. 1 No person, partnership or corporation, shall provide or operate an ambulance service publicly or privately in Weld County unless that person holds a valid license to do so issued by the Department, except as provided in subsection 3.7 of this section. The fee for said license shall be set by separate Ordinance. 3.2 In addition to the license required by Section 3.1 for an ambulance service, the Department shall issue a permit for each ambulance used. Said Ambulance Vehicle Permit shall be issued upon a finding that the applicant's vehicle and equipment comply with the requirements of these Rules and Regulations and the current E.M.S. Act. The Ambulance vehicle permit fee shall be set by separate Ordinance. 3.3 The Ambulance Service License and Ambulance Vehicle Permit shall expire on December 31 of the year issued. 3 . 4 Each ambulance service licensed in Weld County shall have a physician advisor. The Physician Advisor shall be notified in writing by the Department of early violation of this Ordinance by any ambulance service or individual licensee. 3. 5 Advanced Life Support Ambulances. When an ambulance service operates, or charges, as a paramedic or advanced life support ambulance service, the manning must comply with the definition of Advanced Life Support Ambulance. 3.6 Basic Life Support Ambulance. Any ambulance manned and operating as a Basic Life Support Ambulance Service, shall in no way advertise, display or claim to be an Advanced Life Support Ambulance Service unless they are licensed as such. 3.7 Exclusions . The provisions of this Section 3 shall not app y to the following: PAGE 7 RE: AMBULANCE SERVICES RULES AND REGULATIONS 3.7-1 The exceptional emergency use of a privately or publicly owned vehicle, including search and rescue unit vehicles, or aircraft not ordinarily used in the formal act of transporting patients. 3.7-2 A vehicle rendering services as an ambulance in case of a major catastrophe or emergency when ambulances with permits based in the localities of the catastrophe or emergency are insufficient to render the services required. 3. 7-3 Ambulances based outside the State of Colorado or Weld County which are transporting a patient in Weld County and which are licensed by another state or by another Colorado county. 3.7-4 Vehicles used or designated for the scheduled transportation of convalescent patients, handicapped individuals, or persons who would not be expected to require skilled treatment or care while in the vehicle. 3.7-5 Vehicles used solely for the transportation of intoxicated persons or persons incapacitated by alcohol as defined in current C.R.S. , 25-1-302 as amended, but who are not otherwise disabled or seriously injured and who would not be expected to require skilled treatment or care while in the vehicle. 3.7-6 Any person or entity operating or purporting to operate vehicles for the uses specified in Section 3.7-4 .and 3.7-5, above, shall complete an application for exempt status to be reviewed and approved by the Director. The application shall contain, but not be limited to, the following information: (A) The name, address and telephone number of the person or entity operating the vehicles purported to be used in the transportation described in Section 3.7-4 and 3.7-5. (B) The name and address and current telephone number of the person who will be in charge of the operation of the transportation described in Section 3.7-4 and Section 3.7-5 . PAGE 8 RE: AMBULANCE SERVICES RULES AND REGULATIONS (C) The location and description of the place or places from which the vehicles to be used in accordance with Section 3 .7-4 and 3.7-5 will operate. (D) The area to be served by the transportation vehicles. (£) A notarized statement by the person operating the vehicles or the person £n charge of operating the vehicles declaring the purpose of the transportation conducted by that person or entity and the reasons by which the person or entity is entitled to an exemption from the ambulance licensing requirements of this Ordinance. (F) Such other information as the Director may require to make a fair determination on the application for exempt status. 3.7-7 The Director shall review the completed application and shall forthwith either approve or deny the request for exempt status. The Director shall set forth in writing his reasons for denying any request for exempt status. Any person or entity having been denied a request for exempt status may appeal such denial to the Board £n accordance with the procedures set forth below in Section 3.13 Application - Denial Appeal. 3 . 8 Application - Requirements. Every applicant for an Ambulance Service License or an Ambulance Vehicle Permit shall complete and submit to the Department an application and supporting documents for approval. Said application for approval shall contain but not be limited to the following information: 3.8-1 The name, address and telephone number of the owner of the ambulance service. 3.8-2 The name and address and current telephone number of the person who will be in charge of the operation of the ambulance service. 3 .8-3 The description of the ambulance(s) , including the make, model, year of manufacture, current Colorado state license number, motor vehicle chassis number, length of time the vehicle has been in service. PAGE 9 RE: AMBULANCE SERVICES RULES AND REGULATIONS 3.8-4 The location and description of the place or places from which the ambulance service will operate. 3.8-5 The name, address and telephone number of the required advisory physician to the ambulance service. 3.8-6 The area to be served by the ambulance service. 3.8-7 A list of all emergency personnel who may be called upon to respond to an emergency with the ambulance service. This list shall include the following information on each person: a) complete name, address, and date of birth. b) the highest level o£ certification, licensure or training attained. c) a copy of a current Colorado Department of Health EMT-8, EMT-I or Paramedic certificate; or an Advanced First Aid card from the American Red Cross; or a First Responder Course completion certificate; or a Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation card issued by the American Heart Association or the American Red Cross. d) proof of a valid Colorado Driver's License. e) a statement of criminal complaint or convictions including Class I and II traffic violations within the previous twelve (12) months. 3.8-8 Proof of insurance, as required, below, in Section 4.4 of this Ordinance 77-C. 3.8-9 A current copy of EMT or Paramedic Protocols adopted by the ambulance service in accordance with standards approved by the ambulance service's Physician Advisor. 3 .8-9 A current copy of the ambulance service's training standards in accordance with the requirements approved by the ambulance service' s Physician Advisor. 3.8-11 Such other information as the Department may require to make a fair determination. PAGE 10 RE: AMBULANCE SERVICES RULES AND REGULATIONS 3. 9 Application - Approval. After receipt of an original application for an Ambulance Service License or an Ambulance Vehicle Permit, or a renewal thereof, the Department shall review the application and the applicant's record and provide for an inspection of equipment and vehicle (s) to determine compliance with this ordinance_ The Director shall issue a license to the applicant to provide ambulance service and a permit for each ambulance used upon a finding that: (A) The ambulance service staff, vehicles, equipment, and location comply with the requirements of this Ordinance, and (B) The ambulance service's drivers, emergency medical technicians, and paramedics are certified in accordance with the rules pertaining to emergency medical services of the Colorado Department of Health, and (C) The applicant has complied in all respects with the requirements of this Ordinance. 3.10 Obtaining or attempting to obtain any license or permit hereunder by fraudulent means or misrepresentation shall be grounds for denial, suspension, or revocation of such license or permit. 3. 11 If a vehicle is replaced or an additional vehicle or vehicles are added to a service' s fleet, an application for a vehicle permit shall be filed with the Department within 30 days of receipt of the new vehicle or vehicles. The completed application shall include a description of the vehicle (s) that were replaced. Upon receipt of a new vehicle permit application the Department shall inspect the new vehicle and issue the new vehicle permit, if appropriate. 3. 12 In addition to the inspection required at the time of application, the Department may also visit or contact all ambulance services at one other time during the year at which time an inspection may or may not be performed. The inspections of the ambulances and related equipment shall cover but not be limited to the following items: condition of the vehicle, safety and warning systems, Minimum Required Equipment for • PAGE 11 ' RE: AMBULANCE SERVICES RULES AND REGULATIONS Colorado Ambulances (as per current E.M.S. Act, CRS, 25-3.5-101 , et seq. ) . Each service shall provide evidence o£ an adequate on going vehicle safety and maintenance program. This shall be a log which shows the dates of the service and list of service (s) performed. The Department may modify this regulation or adopt additional requirements with the consent of the Board. 3. 13 Application - Denial Appeal. Any person or entity having been denied a license by the Director may appeal such denial to the Hoard. The request for a hearing on such denial must be in writing and shall be filed with f the Clerk to the Board no later than thirty (30) days after the date o£ notification by the Director to the applicant of such denial. The request for a hearing shall specify the grounds of the appeal. 3. 14 Any change of ownership shall require a new application and license, with payment of the same license fee as is • required for an original application. Any sale or exchange of stock of fifty percent (50%) or more of the total outstanding stock of a corporation shall be deemed a change of ownership for purposes o£ this Ordinance. Any change of ownership or any change of stock ownership of ten percent (10%) or more shall be reported in writing to the Director. 3 . 15 No license or permit issued by the Director shall be sold, assigned, or otherwise transferred. 3. 16 All licenses and permits shall be renewed annually, shall expire on December 31 of the year issued, and shall not be renewed until the application been approved by the Department. All applications for renewal of licenses and permits shall be made not later than sixty 160) days prior to the date of expiration. The Department shall notify, by certified mail, return receipt requested, each licensee of the renewal requirements of this section, within ninety (90) days prior to the date of expiration. Section 4 - Requirements for the Operation of Ambulances 4. 1 Ambulance Crew Members - Training. No patient shall be transported in an ambulance within the county unless PAGE 12 RE: AMBULANCE SERVICES RULES AND REGULATIONS there is available in the patient compartment, a Colorado State-certified EMT-Basic or higher level trained person. This requirement is subject to waiver by the Board. Ambulances responding to a call without a State-Certified EMT-Basic or higher level trained person on Board the ambulance shall immediately, upon acknowledgment of the call, notify Weld County Communications Dispatch that the ambulance is responding without such person on board. Without delay, Weld County Communications Dispatch shall contact and dispatch back-up ambulance service coverage with qualified personnel on board to respond to the call. The ambulance driver shall meet the requirements of 25-3. 5-202, C.R.S. , as amended. In unusual emergency conditions when no driver meeting these requirements is available, this requirement may be waived by the Board. A current First Responder Card is considered to be equivalent to the requirements for the ambulance driver requirements. 4.2 Documentation. Each ambulance service shall prepare and transmit copies of uniform and standardized records concerning the transportation and treatment of patients as required by the Director. Such records shall include all information determined to be essential by the Colorado Department o£ Health for maintenance of adequate minimum records on the patient's medical condition and medical care provided by the ambulance service. All County licensed ambulance services shall utilize the statewide emergency medical services uniform prehospital care reporting system operated by the Colorado Department of Health, EMS Division. All records shall be preserved by the ambulance service for a period of at least three (3) years. 4 . 3 Ambulance Crew Members - Criminal Record. Unless waived by the Board, no person shall be employed by an ambulance service as an ambulance crew member who has been convicted of a felony, misdemeanor, Class I, or Class II traffic offense within the previous twelve (12) months from the date of application. 4 .4 Insurance - No ambulance shall operate in Weld County unless it is covered by insurance as set forth in this PAGE 13 RE: AMBULANCE SERVICES RULES AND REGULATIONS paragraph. Each ambulance service shall maintain insurance coverage for each and every ambulance owned, operated or leased by the ambulance service, providing coverage for injury to or death of persons in accidents resulting from any cause for which the owner of the said vehicle should be liable on account of any liability imposed on him by law, regardless of whether the ambulance was being driven by the owner, his agent or lessee, or any other person, and coverage as against damage to the property of another, including personal property, under like circumstances, in the following amounts: a. Statutory Worker's Compensation Insurance: b. Public Liability and Property Damage Bodily Injury: Each person $500,000 Each accident $500,000 Property Damage: Each accident $500,000 Professional Liability Coverage: Each person $500,000 Each accident $1,000,000 Proof of insurance shall be filed with the Department, along with the application for an ambulance service license as required in these regulations. Every insurance policy required shall contain a provision for continuing liability thereunder to the full amount thereof, notwithstanding any recovery thereon, that the liability of the insured shall not be affected by the insolvency or bankruptcy of the insured, and that until a policy is revoked, the insurance company will not be relieved from liability on account of nonpayment of premiums, failure to renew license at the end of the year, or any act or omission of the named insured. At any time said insurance is required to be renewed proof of renewal shall be provided to the Department. The motor vehicle insurance shall be a complying policy as defined in Section 10-4-703 , C.R.S. , as amended. PAGE 14 RE: AMBULANCE SERVICES RULES AND REGULATIONS A certificate o£ insurance, with the Board named on the certificate holders' copy, shall indicate the vehicles covered by the policy, type of insurance, (vehicle and professional liability, etc. ) , policy number(s) , policy effective date, policy expiration date, amount of coverage, and contain a provision that thirty (30) days prior written notice of any cancellation or termination or revocation of said insurance policy shall be given to the Department. Any changes in the status of vehicles listed on the certificate of insurance during the licensing cycle, shall be noted on a new certificate of insurance and forwarded to the Department within thirty (30) days of the changes. Notification of any changes in insurance shall be made in writing within thirty (30) days of such changes to the Department by the licensee, to be followed with a certificate of insurance as outlined in previous paragraphs. The Director may require additional proof of insurance at any time needed in order to promote health, safety, and welfare of residents of the County. 4 .5 Ambulance Specification. Ground vehicles obtained, licensed and placed in use as ambulances, shall at the minimum, meet the guidelines as established by the State Advisory Council. Variances of the above-mentioned specifications may be granted at the discretion of the Di-rector. All ambulances shall have the name of the ambulance service clearly visible on said vehicles. 4 . 6 Ambulance Equipment. Each ambulance shall contain the following equipment which shall be maintained in good working order: a. Emergency lighting and audible warning equipment which complies with Colorado State law for emergency vehicles. b. Safe tires and in addition, adequate snow tires or chains when weather conditions demanC. c. In the case of ambulances serving the County, a capability of two-way radio communication with • • PAGE 15 RE: AMBULANCE SERVICES RULES AND REGULATIONS their dispatcher and with one or more emergency facilities. d. Safety belts for both the ambulance driver and other attending personnel. Safety belts shall be utilized by all persons in the forward compartment. Attending personnel shall utilize seat belts when feasible. Safety belts or other safety restraining devices shall be available for patients being transported. Such devices shall be utilized when feasible. e. A functioning fire extinguisher with current annual inspection of the all purpose dry chemical type, ABC, and of the size as specified on the Equipment List for the County. f.. The minimal required equipment shall be that listed in the list established by the State Advisory Council on emergency medical services and approved by the State Board of Health. The Director may add to this list at his direction as other needs or new methodology becomes known. 4.7-1 Transport - Medical Facility. All ambulances shall deliver patients to the most appropriate medical facility as determined by the Physician Advisor or the Physician Advisor's designee. 4 .7-2 Approved Locations - Abandonment. No licensed ambulance service shall operate from locations other than those approved by the Director nor shall such licensed ambulance service abandon approved locations without prior approval of the Director. 4 . 8 An ambulance service operating in the County must comply with all County and municipal zoning and other regulations. Section 5 - Qualifications of Emergency Medical Technicians 5. 1 No person shall practice as an Emergency Medical Technician for any Ambulance Service subject to the licensing requirements of this Ordinance unless that person holds a valid Emergency Medical Technician license from the State of Colorado. PAGE 16 RE: AMBULANCE SERVICES RULES AND REGULATIONS 5.2 Each Emergency Medical Service shall provide the Department with a list of its Emergency Medical Technicians as per section 3.8-7. 5.3 Before the State certification of an EMT, EMT-B, EMT-I or Paramedic expires, the ambulance service shall provide the department with a written statement showing the name o£ the EMT, EMT-B, EMT-I or Paramedic, the date the certificate was issued, the date of expiration, and the certificate number of the new State certificate. Failure to comply with this Section disqualifies an EMT, EMT-B, EMT-I or Paramedic from practice in any Weld County ambulance service. 5.4 EMT'S or Paramedics contracting or employed by groups and organizations for public events and not affiliated with a licensed ambulance service based in the County shall, upon request, be able to demonstrate compliance with rules and regulations as promulgated by Weld County, State of Colorado, and State Board of Medical Examiners. 5 .5 Emergency Standby Services. Emergency Medical Technicians or Paramedics contracting or employed by groups or organizations for public events to provide emergency medical care in the County must have sufficient supplies and equipment to effect care on the EMT-B level to persons requiring that care. The following is the minimum equipment or service required for provided emergency standby services: A. Oropharyngeal Airways in adult, child, and infant sizes. B. Assorted dressings (Sterile - large and small) . C. Soft roller bandages. • D. Tape. E. Extremity immobilizing devices. F. Triangular bandages . G. Shears capable of cutting clothing or bandages including heavy leather or canvas. PAGE 17 RE: AMBULANCE SERVICES RULES AND REGULATIONS H. Blood pressure manometer, cuff, and stethoscope. I. Cervical collar and/or sandbags. J. Oral suction device. K. Portable oxygen and pocket mask and administration equipment. L. Backboard and straps. M. Direct communication access to a dispatch facility for requesting advance life support care. Section 6 - Unlawful Practices The following practices shall be unlawful and shall be grounds for a suspension or revocation of a license: 6.1 Willful and deliberate failure to respond to any call. 6.2 Willful and deliberate failure to transport a patient when required. 6 .3 Administering unnecessary treatment or supplies to a patient for the purpose of increasing the patient' s bill. 6 .4 Administration of any substance considered a drip or intravenous fluid unless under the protocol and/or order of the Physician Advisor. 6.5 Charging for treatment or supplies not actually provided to a patient. 6 . 6 Requiring and/or allowing any employee of an ambulance service to be on continuous duty for any one period in excess of forty-eight (48) hours, except in cases of extreme emergency. 6.7 Except as otherwise provided in this Ordinance, failure to deliver a patient to the most appropriate medical facility as determined by the physician advisor or his designee. PAGE 18 RE: AMBULANCE SERVICES RULES AND REGULATIONS 6. 8 Conduct which constitutes a significant threat to the health or safety of the individuals receiving emergency care from a licensed ambulance service or services. In any revocation proceeding, evidence of the conviction for any traffic violation is admissible in overall consideration, evaluation and determination and disposition of such revocation hearing. 6.9 Noncompliance with any rule or regulation promulgated by the Colorado State Board of Medical Examiners for the duties and responsibilities or Emergency Medical Technicians, Paramedics, or Physician Advisors. 6.10 Conduct by any person or entity in violation of the triage authority delegated to the weld County Ambulance Service as set forth in Section 8.2. Section 7 -- Suspension or Revocation of License or Permit; Conditional Permits 7.1 Temporary Suspension. Upon a determination by the Director that any person has violated or failed to comply with any provisions of this Ordinance, the Director may temporarily suspend, for a period not to exceed thirty (30) days, any license or permit issued pursuant to this Ordinance. The licensee or permit holder shall receive written notice of such temporary suspension. The temporary suspension shall be effective upon the date of mailing the written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, to .the licensee or permit holder, or on the date of service of the notice upon the licensee or permit holder pursuant to the Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure. A hearing on the temporary suspension shall be held before the Board not later than ten (10) days after the effective date of the temporary suspension. The written notice of temporary suspension shall include notice of the time and place of such hearing. Prior to such hearing, the Director may reinstate the license or permit upon a finding that the licensee has come into compliance with the provisions of this ordinance. 7. 2 All hearings before the Board of County Commissioners shall be public and every vote and official act of the Board of County Commissioners shall be public. The Board of County Commissioners may require an ambulance PAGE 19 RE: AMBULANCE SERVICES RULES AND REGULATIONS service company which is the subject o£ a hearing, to make available such books and records as are desired and requested by the Board of County Commissioners. All testimony at the hearings shall be under oath and shall be electronically recorded. If a stenographic shorthand reporter is desired by any party, such reporter shall be permitted at the requesting party' s expense. The Board of County Commissioners shall make other rules and regulations for the conduct of the hearing as are deemed necessary in its discretion. 7 . 3 The hearing before the Board of County Commissioners shall be conducted in two (2) phases. A. During Phase I of the hearing, the Board of County Commissioners shall determine whether, by a preponderance of the evidence presented in the public hearing, any one or more of the following has occurred: (1) Violation (s) of any provision of this Ordinance. (2) Violation (s) of any law of the State of Colorado, or Ordinance or regulation of any municipality in the County. Evidence of any violation may be considered, regardless of any conviction thereof. (3) Commission of any practices set forth , in Section 6. If the Board does not find that any of the above acts has occurred, the Board shall conclude the hearing and shall reinstate the license or permit for the remainder of its term. If the Board finds that one or more of the above acts has occurred, the public hearing shall progress to Phase II. B. During Phase II of the public hearing, the Board shall consider whether to suspend or revoke permanently the license or permit. The Board may suspend any license or permit issued pursuant to this Ordinance for any portion of or for the remainder of its life. At the end of such period, the person whose license or permit was suspended, PAGE 20 RE: AMBULANCE SERVICES RULES AND REGULATIONS may apply for a new license or permit as in the case of an original application. Upon a finding by the Board that the licensee or permit holder has committed, within two (2) consecutive calendar years, two violations or on two separate occasions has failed to comply with any provision of this Ordinance, the Board may permanently revoke such license or permit. The Board's decision to suspend or to revoke permanently the license or permit shall be based upon whether evidence o£ the following factors mitigates or aggravates the effects of the acts found by the Board during Phase I of the public hearing: (A) The seriousness of the act in terms of affront to the public- (B) Corrective actions taken by the license holder. (C) Prior violations and offenses and the effectiveness o£ prior corrective action. (D) Prior violations and offenses by the licensee or permit holder. (E) The violation, offense, or occurrence as a repeated course of conduct or as a single " event. (F) The likelihood o£ recurrence. (G) All circumstances surrounding the violation, offense, or occurrence. (H) willfulness of violation(s) , offense (s) , of occurrence(s) . (I) The length of time the license or permit has been held by the licensee or permit holder being disciplined. (J) Previous sanctions imposed against the licensee. PAGE 21 RE: AMBULANCE SERVICES RULES AND REGULATIONS (K) Other factors making the situation unique to the license or permit holder subject to discipline. 7.4 It shall be the duty o£ the Director to notify local law enforcement authorities, fire departments, hospitals and the physician advisor(s) of revocation or suspension of any ambulance service license or vehicle permit. Section 8 - Countywide Emergency Service 8. 1 So long as the Weld County Ambulance Service is in existence and is duly licensed pursuant to this Ordinance, the weld County Ambulance Service may provide emergency service to all areas of Weld County and to those other areas specifically set forth in the Weld County Ambulance Service application and license. 8.2 Weld County Ambulance Service shall have triage authority in Weld County where Weld County Ambulance Service and any other ambulance service have responded to calls for emergency assistance. 8 .3 Weld County Communications dispatch may dispatch Weld County Ambulance Service to respond to a call within another ambulance service's service area under the terms and conditions set forth in Section 4 .1. SECTION 9 - No Third Party Beneficiary Enforcement Nothing in this Ordinance shall be construed to create a cause of action and/or civil liability remedy in any person. This Ordinance shall not be construed to create a duty to any third party where no such duty otherwise existed. It is the express intention of the Board that any third party receiving services or benefits under this Ordinance shall be deemed an incidental beneficiary only. Section 10 - Savings Clause 10.1 The repeal of Ordinance 77-B and its reenactment as Ordinance 77-C shall not have the effect to release, extinguish, alter, modify, or change in whole or in part any penalty, forfeiture, or liability, either PAGE 22 RE: AMBULANCE SERVICES RULES AND REGULATIONS civil or criminal, which shall have been incurred under Ordinance 77-B. Ordinance 77-B shall be treated and held as remaining in force for the purpose of sustaining any and all proper actions, suits, proceedings and prosecutions, criminal as well as civil, for the enforcement of such penalty, forfeiture, or liability, as well as for the purpose of sustaining any judgment, decree or order which can or may be rendered, entered or made in such actions, suits, proceedings, or prosecutions, imposing, inflicting or declaring such penalty, forfeiture or liability. 10.2 All licenses in existence under Ordinance 77-B, at the time that said Ordinance was repealed and reenacted as this Ordinance 77-C, shall continue in validity for their term as provided under Ordinance 77-B. Such existing licenses shall be subject, however, to the terms and requirements o£ this Ordinance 77-C without the need for a new application or inspection pursuant to this Ordinance 77-C. Section 11 - Safety Clause The Board of County Commissioners of Weld County hereby finds, determines and declares that this Ordinance is necessary for the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Weld County, Colorado. Section 12 - Severability Clause If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held or decided to be invalid or unconstitutional such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion. The Board of County Commissioners hereby declares that it would have passed ,this Ordinance and each and every section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, and phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases might be declared to be unconstitutional and invalid. • PAGE 23 RE: AMBULANCE SERVICES RULES AND REGULATIONS BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners o£ Weld County, Colorado, that this Ordinance No. 77-C shall become effective , 19 , after its final public notice, in accordance with Section X14 (2) of the Weld County Home Rule Charter. The above and foregoing Ordinance No. 77-C was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the day of , 19_ BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County Clerk to the Board Gene R. Brantner, Chairman BY: George Kennedy, Pro-Tem Deputy Clerk to the Board APPROVED AS TO FORM: Constance L. Harbert C.W. Kirby County Attorney Gordon E. Lacy First Reading: August 22, 1990 Published: August 30, 1990, in the New News Second Reading: September 10, 1990 Published: September 13 , 1990, in the New News Final Reading: September 24, 1990 Published: September 27, 1990, in the New News Effective: October 3, 1990 f 0 ilitr MEMORAnDum Gene R. Br, Chairman County To Board of County Commissioners Dan September 10, 1990 COLORADO From Walter J. Speckman, Executive Director, Human Resources s boa Purchase of Services Agreement between Ms. Cheryl Divine and the Weld County Division of Human Resources' Employment Services Enclosed for Board approval is a Purchase of Services Agreement between Ms. Cheryl Divine and the Weld County Division of Human Resources' Employment Services. The Agreement outlines the Job Club sessions to be provided by Ms. Divine. A total of eight (8) sessions, not to exceed 30 hours per session, will be provided. The terms of this Agreement will not exceed $2,880.00 and will be for the period of September 4, 1990 through December 31, 1990. If you have any questions, telephone me at 353-3816. September 10, 1990 MEMORANDUM T0: Clerk to the a d FR: Jane Orton RE: Purchase of cervices Agreement between Ms. Cheryl Divine and the Weld County Division of Human Resources' Employment Services Enclosed for Board approval are three (3) copies of a Purchase of Services Agreement as stated above. Please return two (2) copies once they have been signed. If you have any questions, please telephone Alvina Derrera at 353-3815. g00833 H Koot(3 Purchase of Services Agreement THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 1 *h day of September, 1990, by and between the County of Weld, State of Colorado, by and through the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, on behalf of the Weld County Division of Human Resources' Employment Services of Weld County, hereinafter referred to as "Employment Services," and Cheryl Divine, hereinafter referred to as "Contractor." WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Employment Services delivers employment services: and WHEREAS, Employment Services is interested in providing Job Club and Job Search activities for JOBS participants and other targeted clients; and WHEREAS, The Contractor can provide specialized Job Club/Job Search activities for eligible participants; and WHEREAS, the Contractor is a certified instructor; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises, the parties hereto covenant and agree as follows: 1. Definitions/Assumptions: a. Each session follows the same basic format. There will be eight (8) sessions conducted under the terms of this Agreement. b. A session is no longer than thirty (30) hours in duration. c. Each session is composed of groups of up to fifteen (15) individuals. d. The sessions will be conducted at Employment Services, 1551 North 17th Avenue, Greeley, Colorado. e. The sessions will be held every two (2) weeks according to the schedule developed by Employment Services. 2. Responsibilities of the Contractor are to: a. Plan and present eight (8) sessions. b. Present the sessions between the time period of September 4, 1990 through December 31, 1990. c. Provide Employment Services with the documentation and evaluations to be used to measure the participant's achievement. d. Take attendance, verify hours of each participant and provide attendance sheets to Employment Services. e. Provide Employment Services with participant evaluations following each class. f. Present certificates of achievement to participants who complete the session. 3. Responsibilities of Employment Services are to: a. Arrange for classroom space for all classes and to provide notification of the location and date/time to the Contractor and participants. b. Monitor the classes. Times and amount of monitoring will be determined by Employment Services. c. Approve the curriculum, methods, and documentation of evaluation to be used for each class. d. Provide all class materials. 4. Operational Time Frame: This Agreement will be in effect from September 4, 1990 through December 31, 1990. 5. Reimbursement: In consideration of the services provided by the Contractor, Employment Services will reimburse the Contractor at the rate of $360.00 per session for a reimbursement total of $2,880.00 ($360.00 per session x 8 sessions). Additional charges will be assessed as follows: Whenever the maximum enrollment level of 15 per session is exceeded, the Contractor may charge Employment Services as additional $10.00 for each individual over the maximum enrollment level . This amount is in addition to the normal charge of $360.00 per session and is based on attendance records which will be maintained by Employment Services. Reimbursement will be made within thirty (30) days of the completion of the sessions and with the stipulation that all participant evaluations have been received by Employment Services. 6. Assurances: The Contractor agrees that he is an independent contractor and neither he nor his officers and employees become employees of Weld County, and therefore are not entitled to any employee benefits as Weld County employees, as the result of the execution of this Agreement. Weld County, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, its officers and employees, shall not be held liable for injuries or damages caused by any negligent acts or omissions of the Contractor, or her employees, volunteers, or agents while performing Contractor's duties as described in this Agreement. The Contractor shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless Weld County, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, its officers and employees for any loss occasioned as a result of the performance of this Agreement by Contractor, his employees, volunteers, and agents. The Contractor understands that monitoring and evaluation of the performance of this Agreement shall be conducted by Employment Services and the results provided to the Weld County Private Industry Council and the Board of Weld County Commissioners. The Contractor assures that he will comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1986 and that no person shall , on the grounds of race, creed, color, sex, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under this approved Agreement. No portion of this Agreement shall be deemed to constitute a waiver of any immunities the parties or their officers or employees may possess, nor shall any portion of this Agreement be deemed to have created a duty of care with respect to any persons not a party to this Agreement. No portion of this Agreement shall be deemed to create an obligation on the part of the County of Weld, State of Colorado, to expend funds not otherwise appropriated in each succeeding year. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Agreement is for any reason held or decided to be unconstitutional , such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions. The parties hereto declare that they would have entered into this Agreement and each and every section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, and phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, or phrases might be declared to be unconstitutional or invalid. 7. Amendment of Agreement: Employment Services and the Contractor consent that this Agreement may be amended at any time with the mutual written consent of both parties. 8. Termination of Agreement: Employment Services and the Contractor consent that this Agreement may be terminated upon thirty (30) days written notice by either party. Furthermore, this Agreement and all contracts associated with this Agreement will be terminated immediately if the funding received by Employment Services is withdrawn. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereunto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed as of the day and year first hereinabove set forth. WELD 0 NTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS CONTRACTOR Wfrr, hairman ery i ne WELD COUNTY DIVISION OF ATTEST rim/JAL/4 HUMAN RESOURCES WELD COUNTY CLERK TO THE BOARD Walter . eckman .By: 1 Executive Director a uty er to t oar RESOLUTION RE: APPROVE CONTINUANCE OF PROTEST CONCERNING MOWING SERVICES BY PEST AND WEED DEPARTMENT - EICHLER WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners o£ Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board has been presented with protest from Haiko Eichler concerning mowing services done by the Weld County Pest and Weed Department, and WHEREAS, Mr. Eichler was not able to be present at the meeting of September 5, 1990; therefore, he requested, in writing, a continuance of said matter until September 12, 1990, and WHEREAS, after consideration, the Board determined that the above mentioned protest be continued to September 12, 1990, at the regular Board meeting at 9:00 a.m. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the protest from Haiko Eichler concerning mowing services done by the Weld County Pest and Weed Department be, and hereby is, continued to September 12, 1990, at 9:00 a.m. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 5th day of September, A.D. , 1990. � �/n� /!� BOAR F COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST• ,/�///� O BWELOA OF CO C CORADO OMMISSIONERS Weld County Clerk to the Board nne --we/�R.. an ner, C airman e Kennel Pr ' t_ B7C�1Y711-211 c_J �_ y t -2 Geo g y, D puty Clerk to a Board !/ APPROVED AS TO FORM: Cons ante L. Bar rb8 t� -est C e�—Q C.W. Kirby �JCounty Attorney EXCUSED Gordon E. Lacy 900802 c X ^o /c:9- L+C , .X', , C 4 , WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PAGE 1 PAYROLL FUND CLAIMS V.O. WARRANT N0. P.O. N0. VENDOR _ AMOUNT 015255 WELD COUNTY REVOLVING FUND x,708.5! 015256 UNITED BANK OF GREELEY 11,339.76 015257 JAMES R. FRANK 2,583.85 015277 CAMERON J. ALDRICH 238.63 015260 DISTRICT COURT OF WELD COUNTY 2,169.66 015261 DISTRICT COURT OF BOULDER 279.51 TOTAL STATE OF COLORADO ) COUNTY OF WELD ) ss This is to certify that all accounting and budgeting procedures have been completed on the above listed claims as shown on Pages 1 through and dated SRPTFNERR 10 . 19 90 and that payments should be made to the respective vendors in the amounts set opposite their names with the total amount $ . DATED THIS 10TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER , 19 90 . WELD NTYilCE-`�COUOFFIt SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS 10TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 19y_L. MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: 4 --- i5' — cPyr 0 J �,, STATE OF COLORADO ) • COUNTY OF WELD )) ss We, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, hereby (approve) disapprove) the claims as set forth above; and w ants in payment therefore are hereby ordered drawn upon the PAYROLL F totaling S _,-- . AC le airperson // C � _ ATTESTylerk co Member —min Coun & Recorde Membe ..,/� By / r.�<-nc..cc i k , ,c->4n--� Member Oeputi � Member WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PAGE 2 PAYROLL FUND CLAIMS V.O. WARRANT N0. P.O. N0. VENDOR AMOUNT 015262 CLERK OF THE DISTRICT COURT OF LARIMER COUNTY 450.00 015263 COUNTY COURT OF WELD COUNTY 308.83 015264 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 2.75 • 015265 ALTA ADMINISTRATORS 6,268.22 015266 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE 13,212.37 • 015267 J. PAT GREGORY & ASSOC. , INC 1,417.52 TOTAL b STATE OF COLORADO ) . COUNTY OF WELD )) ss This is to certify that all accounting and budgeting procedures have been completed on the above listed claims as shown on Pages 1 through and dated SFPTEMBER 10 , 19�. on and that payments should be made to the respective vendors in the amounts set opposite their names with the total amount $ DATED THIS 10TH DAY OF SEPTFMBER , 19 90 1 WEL IIY N NC OF IC SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS 10TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 19 90 . MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: —1-9.2) NOT (we?Al/ a� ARPI Arm STATE OF COLORADO ) COUNTY OF WELD )) ss We, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, hereby (approve) disapprove) the claims as set forth above; and rrants in payment therefore are hereby ordered drawn upon the PAYRnLt F totaling alrperson • ATTEST �� p/� Mem er Al„�18I pi ��Q�"6,/,‘ � ) Memb Bye � 4 _ �r J �/4---iZtr <�_' t<_,, h.) Deputy Member Member 1 WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PAGE 3 . PAYROLL FUND CLAIMS V.O. WARRANT N0. P.O. N0. VENDOR AMOUNT 015268 MERASTAR 6,714.8u 015269 THE lamplp INSURANCE 881 .96 015270 RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE 7,871.12 015271 PEAK HEALTH PLAN 8.294.50 015272 UNITED WAY 760.26 015273 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT ASSOC. 16,203.11 TOTAL STATE OF COLORADO ) COUNTY OF WELD )) ss This is to certify that all accounting and budgeting procedures have been completed on the above listed claims as shown on Pages 1 through and dated sEPTEMBER 10 , 19 90 and that payments should be made to the respective vendors in the amounts set opposite their names with the total amount $ . DATED THIS 10TH DAY OF sEPTEMBER , 1990 . WEL C U C C SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS 10TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1990 . MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: (2-, - e2 -- 9e) ,cder-----telflt STATE OF COLORADO ) . COUNTY OF WELD )) ss We, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, hereby (approve) disapprove) the claims as set forth above; and warrants in payment therefore are hereby ordered drawn upon the PAYROLL F totaling $ . a rperson -----Member �- AT7E5T �� / //��,f �,�gn yry� �CLU^ i7 Membe Y x/�nf Oeput \ Member / k� / .ember 1 WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PAGE 4 • PAYROLL FUND CLAIMS V.O. WARRANT N0. P.O. N0. VENDOR AMOUNT 015274 PUBLIC r..MPLOYhab KLIIRhMhNI ASSUL. - 642.49- 015275 WELD COUNTY REVOLVING FUND 22.81 015276 HARTFORD LIFE INS. CO. 11,2'32.52 TOTAL $ 92,803.24 STATE OF COLORADO ) COUNTY OF WELD 3 ss This is to certify that all accounting and budgeting procedures have been completed on the above listed claims as shown on Pages 1 through and dated SEPTEMBER 10 , 19 90 and that payments should be made to the respective vendors in the amounts set opposite their names with the total amount $92,803.24 DATED THIS 10TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER , 19 90 WELD C UN Y FINAdi 0 R SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS 19TH DAY OF sEpm8yBER 19�. MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: y" - - 9 9( N D� t ICIA9 cre--47 STATE OF COLORADO ) . COUNTY OF WELD )/ ss We, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, hereby (approve) , disapprove) the claims as set forth above; and warrants in payment therefore are hereby ordered drawn upon the PAYROLL F 0 totaling $92,803.24 , airperso ATTEST:Aje �//I,/"�`� af�� Mem r BY DfratZtlemet eputy/ _r_ 6 4_,J( �/ ember • � Member *,}4q • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ®_ /\ s / b -1 -0 — Y 0 b D C A 1: I A 9 x a a 1 K C O 1 D S a O 4; 1. O K m K 9 Y I W M I i O -a 3 -4 t!4 I! C m i 9 m A N A I m c rn r S N I' C �b 1 T A O A T I O w c r r+ 9 -I 1 T C 3 A A r rn N 9 1 K :w -4 H C K 3 1"' H� N O -I v (��, A 1\� r. 1 �1 �1 T N T A N N � C N PI M R- r V% x o b o T O Ir m , m ^ 07 .+ O wl V C K A 1 A O 1 O a T 1 \ C II A I M C A 1� \T 1 q G 9 H N A 1 C T IO b O -1 A I . a IQ O N G T Si l rain . Y m 14 E I A a X N 2 O T A •\�\ I tl rn 9 O L D 1 N 9 -4 I 9 �1 1, r C 1 �• S 9 r 1 T. C _V- a A A A n b ti 0 C 9 rn � A p O A rn mYf^ nKA ` r C0N K T C1Lbm A -1f -ito ko M s z! , OT 1 r -1 -O^I ::: O7 m r aOI mAKatNi rrtiI\ A 1 m A D IA9N1\ C 2 A K C I Y -•1 Y b. -c 1 /� I -C 1+: O O 3 I Z -C t^ r a x Z G K N'-� 3 {� A l 5 C r d 9 a m m ��111 �! O A its,. T 1 mr. m A A a 3 9 � C F r w cd •r m T A a O A o G C I z C J N A' I r v 1 c7 0 r m r z A m r -1 1 C rn r y (^ ti l 1 � H D A r 2 r A A KI A S h. AI DC� Al 1 r O 1 r 1 T, N q 1 L K 9 1 IS L o 3 C C b t 1 C7 2 -1 p- n 0 - A A a sr; I w r 1'C -y C --1 -4 m A C N A .IVJ N O � '+ C 7 $-• rn O O y ,T 0 Z r N PI C O a VI � O C) O N Z H X I^. 0 N - N b H -4 9 z -4 m m m c A \ m K I I r A m o z O A r C T r C -I Y b V 9 O m n O K r \ A 0077r A r A -a O b 0 m r -i b B: D O C O 9_ 40 S Cr N 0 r H Z O O I « A 9 S a A 1 a tt C K 1� A m 9 m -4 I Iv I� O z n ki n A 0 r 1 I M c --4 T 1 c m m • � -C • • -$1 9 r C1 (('��; m 9 1 1"�+ D A A A z 1 b M H S a b r I r A A 0 1 e n m I r z 1 m c o I 9 9 1- a c 9 0 $ 73 73 o NC m s m n D 4- z N m IT I Z I. b -I x I'' . a n .• •• x N A IS N 0 C O x1 s a r m u I m v rn it ., z m r + \ S 2 A I K I f z 07 O CO c 3 I I a m v m 1 m 9 1 I I -I Z T \ A I A Z I I S b z NCO I I • • m 0 0 • • • • • • • ♦ • • • • • • 0 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • it H N N N N N N N r S O W co 2 co Co Ca Co T A A W W W W W W W W C XI O UI O 01 N 0 V 0 2 r N r� r r r r r r •+ O A O P Cf a P N CII 0 N r Z O W N F' O ID O V O, z H O a 2 X 2 O A A 'CI N N T A A A n n b x 7C r r r < O O ril n 7, r m 7 2 7! O b A -1 M '0 A A z 7:i r o s C c 17 z A O O n Y •• P N N A A 2 A R O A T A S b N N C 2 O n r r N N '0 D 77 -C A A O O n Rf n n A N _ K W r r A 4 S A A i A X C) V N A •C XI CAm ,IAr zb •• y r n 2 `- O t O cc wmC s c 1.. c r O 1+ O •• .4 r n -.IN -C F r \ -1 V) re o z 1+ r r . H r h• is. is. w F. Os r be ••• M N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Co A 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 n A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A C A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A RI O W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W 17 C ✓ M. W. Y In Y V r r M on N •• � m. 41 z 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 H P P P a a a a a P a a O, a P P O ✓ V V V V V V V V V V W V W V b Z r r r r o4 r r r . .• 01 •" O ". L C N N N N N N N N N O N V O V O 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 '0 CO C1 0 O n 0 O O C1 C1 O O O n O Cl 70 T A A A b b b A A A A A A A A A O A C b b O d b O O C 7. n O 7C O 7C t O n O 0 n O O O 0 •• O C r C •'• It a II 11 11 11 II II '0 O is 11 11 II is II is 11 A A II 11 II 11 II II II II CI II II II II II II II II M IT a II II II 11 11 11 11 n u u u u u it u •• •• 11 11 11 a 11 a II N N 11 P CI r 11 11 II II II 11 II Is •. 11 •• •• A A O II be r II N •• 1+ II II II mt .+ It 11 N O 11 V 0 2 X b 11 co r W (.1 11 .0 N A `• 11 P a 11 •• •• 11 Co O 11 N N 11 N N 11 P CO b CO O A � 11 P •• V V 11 W P V 'C 11 W W It N NW 11 O O ll A A 11 O O II O AN 4. C A O 11 • 1 • • • 11 • • a • 11 • • II • 11 • • 11 • e II • • 11 • • • • w S V 11 P ( .0 O N 11 N A N A 11 V V 11 b .0 0 40 O 11 W W 11 O O 11 N OO O H •1 \ II O 1 kD CO W II N W CO A II N V II .0 'a no O II O W 11 O O 11 O 000 •D II I 11 11 11 II II 11 II •+ O • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • I 4 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • e • • • • CO W Co m m CO m O 2 A D CA u u u W u C70 N O O N N N N O 2 A N .. 4- r .. r a A O J d O a Q O. C, O. m 2 0 P. O 10 Co J P N • A -4 Ms 2 m A C H A .. A A O r r -0 O T n O < ►4 p m C m m m m m 3 T- a r I. m A Ya A A 3 A C A N A -C O C. R: -4 A Cr A O -C C C -0 -4 m m m ro m 11 2 C N A C A A I> A A A A O m 2 -C r a C A X> O N O O r -C O -C O n .. n A .+ n 0 c: m m P. n X N 2 A r -i O m O A N A -C c -4 A X N O O A PI a A -+IAr O -c z o .. y M n z 2 O A O CZ N m C s o fin = a .. O .• -r m n V N K A it \ ti •C m O A r r r r .. .. r r MI N N N N N N N N N O A 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 f1 A at. • • • • • • • C fl p r p • • • • • • IT O T W W 4 W W W u u GJ '0 C .. 1.: r r r .. N. r r -1 2 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 -I a a C+ P O. C. P 0‘ 0., P O r N u V -4 W N .1 u N o '- .. O .. .. .p .- r. .O L C H O .- N N P N N O, O A O 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 -J W -; A C a O 07 O a Co O A M A m A A A C A A C X> O A r c o o A c o A r L 2 nn - It 11 II 0 is II II II II 0 C II II II 11 II II 11 II II A A II II 11 II II II II II II O -4 4 II II II II 11 II II II m m it u n it it n ti it u 11 M. It o 11 u u 11 a 11 it. .. 11 N 0 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 Z 11 .. 11 11 II 11 II 11 11 11 A A O II CO II II O we 11 11 II V V 11 II V V II N N Y A •C 11 r II V V II W u 11 N N 11 m I- 11 N N 11 � 11 N 0 a ..• in. O A \ 11 N1 1 11 N O 11 a p 11 O O 11 •G •D 11 O O 11 W O N 11 O O 11 O O C A O II • I II • • II - . II . 11 • • II • • 11 . • • II . II • . 2 a. V 11 I+ 1 U O O 4 O O II Ok a II 10 d 11 O O 11 I. 0. p 11 O a 11 O Co —I —I II W 1 II O O II O O II M b II .p .p II O O 11 N W 10 II O O 11 O O b 11 1 11 11 II 11 11 II II II N O S • • 41 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ili • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •, / ++ x N b 9 P n b V \ I D '^ a b 1 K C P 1 D 3 D O ro 1 / I r m K m z O .- I r c r x -I N r // E O rn A O n n 1 C a c r o O `� r. o .-------K l m coW 2 O o x n t -+ rn o ro r y p M C M 3 .. K r N O r v m s 1 ., m o � .c m .. .4r �I rn fit m A N \ IT N N n N '2 N O N m O ,1\N' O 1 m m I C O I K .I O K C ( A O A_ T I \ Z O y+ z I� m c D I Z. z O it o T ,.\ K Icy Q� T o A k:::\ C •-11 I TK Ire\ 1 F'C' C N P (E n 1O T m1 I'1 A a k N Z I C- O f+1 A 1n �1 I'C m r O ro C D 1 t" ND -1 1 r I'. r T w O z w A A .- I m C b x A A C) C -1 P IS 71 1 _A K U m C C y z m K m '+ C K m r O = O I • -i y S G Z O D O -77 rn r r I CI R: r r a T I m -4 { x I m a 1 z 7 N r i...- I F S C) T v I a ti a m K In O r- C z I ' < m r a E f ..- O _ 3 I A 1 9 S C r to b m m ,r, .. C n 2 t 1 . . .1 s er r c cc q C A r .+ 1 m n b O A m C Q C I-- D G D N 1 N r r n T D r r m -1 I S c '* .+ c` I 0 A n ' P AI A KI O Si A S .+ MI 1 O •• -I I I� m 0 C I � D 1 4.. x N a c n �S I v z K •4 x U7 Z O A O D m .-. OR .1r O 4-4 .O f* C 1 C N .��. M C C D w \ O r Z N ... r 0 ' O H -4 O a y I r C C V H K _ cr. N \-4 D z 1 M ` rn r c c D •C m 1 M C Z o A I., C 47C I C r s O Z 40O m 1 .. O r 1 O O A r 1 n O cc .- Z r c r I„ D O C .J m C N V r r z O ? 1 a n a S P 1 i-Z N., C C K 11�.� A m a r IQ 4 O ' O IV O 17 C'7 I c r 11 I c m m I . Pc, m y • • z a qI(\�' E. {1y � r m •- ro I I D o M1.� CI M In A OU E, t- o IQ C o m * A 1� t_ m c el C a a Iii O C ,� A o � c S A roP a p �� J m m b D 2 N c. -I Z I � O mm -1 ' I PO o s n N m 4.4 m N e •• •• _2 2 .. m ��.c((1� rn o 2 s I A z K h -� D m V w m x ffJJ m m a z A I A Z I 2 v z b 1 I W O • • 0 • • • • 0 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • i a D D a a D D D Z 2 D •• V V 4— P• H w N W W CO W Gel W W W C P v CO Co 6 to Co Co co to 2 A N O O O O O O O O m D O V V V V V V V V m Z O IO Co V OP in + U N A M b el n n n to a a D 'C O M D D A 2 2 0 D M x r D .1 m r K O s r N 1 X A D M F Rt N -1 M m 2 m a O r O Am a o O Z $ p a 2 N N z 2 r o •• m n F D n r s 2 w o m c n o z 2 M Z 2 n o O 2 I A m m n M a Z a r 0 N v .+ a Z Z n N 021, N -0 O m m r `- a 2 A Op m 2 2 • m :+ r K • z O u M M n o N 2 O 00 N W O O O a W 72 070 10 N P• O + + N N N Co V r )- + CC 40010 N 1- O O 441U00000 0000 0 N N + + + O O S O "soz V O o ♦ N W + o W V o P• V V V V O. o ms O r s o V O o rnN V VNb 40 r O to g) Nf9 + m n 0VIK O O 00 N 0Crt 0 N .G X IIt 4 m O A N O O O NNNNNNNO 0 N 'N N m w P• NNNNNNN N N O D 1 I ! I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 n N . w w 0000000 w N W W W W W on N O r O NNNNNNN •• N m 0 r o w r o w T C O I>. O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w O 00000 M 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 M O M 0 0 MOP0 M00 O 0 0000M O W W W N NNNNNNN 4 W W W W W W Co Z W a V N w wN N •. ww 0 N V 4C W O O ‘0 0000000 O N Y 1 II CO n b m A 0 CO 4 II II 1 11 I 11 11 II II TO 11 II II 11 It II II 026 ti tt 11 11 11 U N 01 II 11 II II II II 11 In m u n u u u u u II u u II u u u •• •• 0 u u II If II II W T II II 11 11 11 11 11 •• D D O PP II 11 U ON w 11 P• w 11 U W 11 w 0 .4 ... 440 Z 70 IO W 11 in. I- It W W II N N II 01 N N •• NO OW W N N Co Il 1.1 W + 000 O 70 0 II N N ON N HO O II or N w N N O N N 11 N CO II + + 11 N + W CO 0 P' C D O • H • • 11 • • 11 • • H • 11 • • 11 • • 11 • • • • • • Z 2 0 O II W W II O 1 0 II O O II IC 0o4 COV W O 11 CO O 11 OS Oh 11 N CCCDNtDJ M M N. O 11 co .C Ho 1 O no O n V ONNo + V W 11 IO 40 0 W W 004 1- 40 + ON •0 11 0 1 11 11 1 0 11 0 4-445 • • • • 0 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 ij • • • • • • ♦ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 C A b CO CO Cr Co CD co Co 0 ?, 2 A N 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 O O O 9 0 Co CO Co Co Co Co Co Co v m 2 O J P P r 4 N im 0 •D A -1 b 9 b b 9 C 0 9 O O 9 m A m -4 a a a o o m D -I A N 11 CI a m z R: K ~ PI C N Z r" X X O t A O A 'M A "L• •+ r Z• N n n r m . T n Si in b S m A O -4 an •• -1 r A a H h 2 2 Is O r T A n n 2 2 a -4 a • r • n o c r b z 'C •• b z n r 9 x N X. O N r a A r A •. In < .+ O A m 9 2 A M 9 r- • n c a o •• n 40 NO 44 I- 00 0 0 N N i0 2 2 ODIC NI N r 0 a Co Co Co 4L 0 O N O C C •0 MC ✓ 0 a .• 6 N N II-. N a s .I r S C X 0 2 a a Co r 4 4r' 4 N Co P r a N 0 r O IS S CO O •D N P 0 •0 0 N O. P a m n 0 N •[ 4 4N •• 0 .1 O O P CJP A CO \ am O A 0 N 0 a -• 1- r a 00 00 T N N NN N 10 .00 N Pm le •^ •• O9 1 I I I I I I I I 1 1 l i n CI 0 N I.P. N a l t N � •• N N C n a a 0 to N r r r 0 O O 0 rn O • r r r r rr 1• R I.. N N N N *0 0 O O O O O 0 0 0 O � r O 0 -1 r 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 l i -I a a a s a a P a a a a a s O N 4 4 4 4 N N N 4 N N N N CO 2 N N NN N N •• N N n � r1- LC 10 N N N N O N O N O O O O 2 'O A m O A It II II I! 11 II 11 11 I II 13 C 11 II 11 II II II II II 11 9 9 II II n N 11 0 II 11 II n H 11 11 11 II II 11 II II II III t0 II II II II II II II II II II II II • II 11 II 11 II •• •• II II II II II II II II 11 r II 11 11 1 11 II 11 II 11 II 9 II 11 r r II 4 1 N 11 11 r � II 11 4 4 11 11 •• 'i A 0 11 4 4 11 CO CO 11 0 l a CO 11 a P 11 a N O II N N 11 10 10 O 11 N N + 11 4 O A \ II ♦ ♦ II r r II N I a 4 11 V V O a a a N ON N II OD P r II N .41 II O C 9 O II • • II • • 11 • 1 • • 11 • • 11 • • • • 11 • • 11 • • • II • • • 11 • Y 2 0 11 a a 11 .1 .! 1! t 1 Co P II CO Co II V NO 0 11 0 ID II ♦ P V 11 a . 0 11 O -1 %. 11 ! ♦ 11 O O 11 .11 NN II P o It a OIOfr. 110 0 II O a II 4 0 C 11 O 10 II 11 11 1 11 11 II II 11 I II N O • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 411 • s • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • a b a 9 a b a 9 D I e z M V .• IM is s r M V• ; MD D W W W 41 N W W W tr C JO 9 Co m Co no Co Co Oo 0 O 2 F N o O o O o 0 0 0 0 is a 0 V t0 V 50 40 V d Co CO m 2 O .0 V f tr N •. O V O` A M b 2 2 r .. x S n n co '0 a a m 2 O M A A A 9 7' 2 07 r c r o m m K X a N O n •/ r m m m ✓ a a m x M M r r m m m n 1n m m m m K O 7C • x M A -t K 4. 2 N r co co n m H Co O n m .• o m o n n a 2 $ C n a O M Jo m o n 2 9 z 0 K m a x o n -I 77 •4 w In M r •0 M n o eo n • o M m w co -4 b 2 A co O r D K a r y n r co a V O H 70 S M JD O OAm 2 'CI a mar to co 2 O .. H M n V f 2 2 W V V .+ O O 2 z O 70 O f u n M O W W N O 40 C a 5o m t o o to o O N t.1 co N o S O \O S W O V 6 V a •. CO N ON CO M OM N O V LI O N f 0 O m n ON CO K O. O f V M 0 N a m %47 m O A W 0 0 0 O O N O N N O O tit f M M M. M M N M N N •. •. 0 9 r 1 .0 0 ... r W to H N O M r O n O O O O .. f N O N N O O m 0 f N N f •. O n 0+ r f 0 f S C ♦ O O 01 O O O Is O O r .• V 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 M O 0 0 ON to P O. P ON ON P Ot O NO tai W NO W W Ca W W N tJ N m 2 N O V ♦ V V N o N N 0 N L C O V b 07 V O O O N O N 50 O V 2 n n n 77 m S n n n ` 2 II II II II II II 11 II It b 0 II 11 11 11 It II 11 11 II a a it it II 11 11 11 it tt 11 O V II a II 11 11 II 0 II II m m ii II M II II II 11 II II II 11 11 r .• V N It 11 11 ti 11 II 11 .. .• ON N 11 O 0 4.. N 11 o 11 11 11 11 o Z 11 .. 11 . . u •• O II 11 0 O 0 it D D O 11 V V it LI .. N O. It 11 ♦ ♦ II II II N r 11 is M it .• r 2 77 40 11 V t0 11 O O is ♦ 11 11 f ♦ 11 W tr II ♦ ♦ 11 V V V It 40 NO O O O O 70 \ O N N II r td 50 .0 0 V V 10 O O II ♦ f 11 O5 O. II O O. ♦ 0 Co 0 n O O C D O It • • II • • • • 11 • • II • • 11 • • 11 • w 11 • • • II • • 11 • • 2 2 a 11 O O It m fn's- Ho O 11 f ♦ 11 N N 11 ON P HO 00 11 ♦ ♦ 11 0 1 0 V V \ 00 O 11 N V V s 11 O O II O O 00 O 11 CO CO 0 0 00 11 O O II 0 1 0 V II 11 11 11 II 1I it II II 1 W O • • • • • • ♦ • • • • • • • ♦ • • • 0 • • o • • • • O • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • a a a a a a a a a x z r r .• .• r r r r r- 2 9 a W W W W ' W W W W W C A V CO CO CO Co CO m Co CO CO 2 A N PA Is r IS r IS O O O O a O O O O O O O b b b m2 O O a W N r o to m V A •I b 9 9 O O z 2 2 2 2 S C a 2 m o w O O •. 9 77 A O 41 a m c z x -C ✓ x s m -i r z •• m m rr m c z z a 1 1 - rn n N 7' C a n 2 M• A O n A n O 2 nt a •A+ •Om O a N c 2 w m m A 2 N D r a n I., r A m a .-I .• a r•. 2 r to o m o m L .+ N 2 n a z a n .• c c a a m, z m m r e • n r n a z n m O O b a n o z K 7o S O ti m O A T ✓ m A star O A 0 .. zO w n V o O W O W O O O a N z 2 expo mow N W N m b b O O C < b MC N CO a a O N N O O O b 2 0 \CI 2 O O .N. V b Si b 2 d N r m ,4 0min4 n 00 •C O O H O O V A m \,4 b m O 720 O O O O O O O O O N O -1 Is Is r r IS r IS r r N 1" 0 9 t 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 n r r r r Ip PA h7 r r N W O n O 00 0 O O r 0 IS 0 ♦ III P 0 .. 1. N 0 m a In W O b C A.I m •. N O r O r a O O +1 2 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I N OI N a 0 0 0 0 0 171 0 a O UWW N W W W W W W N O z a a a N Co Co N V V N r 0. C 0 0 O b r O O O O N O 2 I I I 1 17 Co am O• 00 n ` a D a b O C C II 11 II 11 II II 11 11 II '0 0 II II 11 11 11 II 11 11 11 9 9 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 II 11 O N II ti II It II II II 11 II m m • II 11 11 II II II It II II . It 11 11 II 11 II 11 11 11 " •• 11 11 11 11 11 11 II 11 11 2 11 11 11 II II 11 0 It II a a O 11 11 11 11 11 r n. 11 11 11 r or II 2 A b 11 r 11 W W 11 N 0 11 a a II Co CO 11 • N N 11 N N 11 r r pp II N 11 V II ♦ a a n a 11 II in 11 In (n O, O. o Ir a V V C OM W V W V a II O 11 • • • • 0 • • II • • 11 • • 11 • • 11 • • 11 • • 11 • • 11 • • 2 z 0 11 N W a V ON N 00 O 11 a ♦ 11 W W 11 a a II O O DO O 11 N m M H \ II O W V O II Co m II O O 11 b b 11 N N 11 0 O; II O O II O O POO b 11 II 11 II 11 II 11 11 11 a O • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • o • • e a a a a A a a a 9 p a .. .. .. .. .. •. z W u W W W u u u u c a t a a a a a a a a a 2 z N .. r .. ow r r •. r. 1. C a O PO r 1m r r O O O O m 2 O ♦ W N 1" O .0 a V P 2 •M b X b 2 m L •i N .• m a Xi .. ►. r .• o o m r d � I m 0 a z m m O m a o c a s 77 - m ►I T 2 1= 2 2 ••1 m N A r O O •• 9 w z z O N "0 91 11 CO .. T C C S A C 2 r .. CO 1, z r `m. z n (1 D M 2 n z X 9 r 2 z 2 r n is n M 1 0 • o = n O N H o 2 z m 2 m N a z 17 A L O 2 m 11 A r z •. H 01 n P W a 9 CO 61 O O 2 W z z o 7D O m o r 2 co O .0 2 .. V CC 0 m • 0 P r N P ♦ 0 m CO O 2 0 N.0 2 N N CO 11 ♦ CO ♦ 2 .0 ♦ a w O 01 =I Vf ♦ r .0 V O m n no •e N o -• .b m �N .o m 02 .. i. O O O P N O O O 0 11 10 10 I. .• 11. V N .-. 1m P. N 0 a I I 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 n ♦ ♦ .• .• .• .. In N N •'• 0 O n ►. n O O O •. 0 NO r w N m 0 ✓ V P P P •0 r a a r w T c 0 0 r r r N O O O O O � 2 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 .1 P P 0 P P P P P P P P O N N W W W N W W N W W 61 2 N N P t ♦ •• N P W V N L C O O O V V N N O •. O N 2 'b CO 2• r n .. 0 0 2 29 CIT L r N T •• 11 II II 11 II 11 11 11 11 b O II II 11 11 II II II 11 II a a 11 11 11 11 11 II 11 11 11 O ml II II II II II II /I II II In In • li II I 11 11 n 11 II II II 11 I II 11 11 1I II •• •• II I/ 11 I II 11 II II II X II II II 1 II II II II II A A O 11 II 11 1 11 11 10 10 11 W W II 11 2 2 •C 11 C71 N II VI N II V1 .• ♦ Iv) 0 11 W W 11 V V 11 O O II 11 N N O A *is 11 a O V 11 N N 11 Co NO Ica Co 11 ♦ ♦ OM 0 00 O It P P 11 P P C 9 O 11 • • • II • • • • • • 1 • • 11 • • 11 • • II • • II • • 11 • • 2 2 01 11 r W a !IN N II O P W 10 0. II VI 0 DO O 11 O O 11 Co CO 11 Co a H .1 n P ♦ I. II N VI 11 O P . 1 N N 11 O O 11 O O 11 O O HO O 11 O O 10 II 11 II 11 II it 11 11 11 VI O • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 411 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • w •b- r 2 D a W W W W W C A 9 r ► r r r 00 o r r r r r MX O .D CO V 0% 0 A M .0 X i I S Z M M Z m m a r r ow r M K ✓ n -+ o m r r m mm In D M A 7C 3 M N 0 r N m r c • b 2 W m A r D O 0 K a o C x t0 A A D A C •• D A r m N -1 S C r M M C •• X O m e el . A M a r a N a a z t OA ni 71 a r 2 b .. .. M A S. 0 22 O A O ✓ �+V r ' Q 0 C C 10171 0 W a N O e e W N N s s W O O X0 \02 b W .1 0b W N0m0 W Om 0 Ws Orr O r rW MA K r Am \M 0M OM O 0 r aaorrr0000 O It r N r 41 r r N 10 0 w M r r r VA I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 ( 1 1 A r N W r 10 r a t a W 0 N 0 r O A r N r r 0 0 a r r O 0 r 0 0 m 0 '11 r r W IO N r r r .1 N N r N ♦ VC M O O N r O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r M2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 M D 0 0 0 0000000000 P 0 ✓ W W N W W W 0 N N W W N W W m 2 .1 N N s0m00000 0 0 M LC M 0 N 0 N000000000 O Y O 1 VW M A A M D M OX ✓ C L .. r II 11 11 It II II 10 C) II II II 11 II 11 AA II II 11 11 II II a -t II II • II II II M M 11 r 11 11 II 11 • H N 11 tl It 11 11 so. • N H 11 11 11 II S • • II II II 11 11 DD O fl 0 tl 11 HQ W H W W 11 i X V 11 W HO a OW 0 H0 0 HO r r r r 11 W W OA \ H * 11 a a 11 CD Ia II V V II 0 00000420 x10O II r r C b O fl • 11 • • 11 • • 11 • • 11 • ♦ • • • • • • • • • If • • Z 2 0 n * 110 O 11 O O It CO 0 11 a 0 OOO O t o N O N 0 II CC 0 r r \ HG n0 O 11 O 1 O n0 0 UP ►' O 000410000 II M r IC 11 II 11 1 11 11 11 00 • • 0 • • • • • • • • • • • • ♦ • • • • 0 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • II 71 p H .. S N O A q n b a S a A 1 M C I w M N 01 O m a 1 m m S S m ►m n 0 I M C m 'O = o r O M A •, P n m 7 2 c r r o Imo, m z O 2 x ti m N b 1� r 4 -1 C -1 S mM ••I N O H I.� p s t� m 2 A `. A O I V m 4••• llv 1� �1 w- m N N m JO N \ O N IX n N S N P N m. O 1`111 O m to 1 a T i ` O 1 \ A •� O I O A 1 O �0 ^ - 111 O � T w A 2 v Z 1 Ir q o i n i : tit o N v I MI S I I Q 17 •• 2 m 1 1 �` x D I• X N 2 1 b m F I r 1 m b 11 t1y^� b0+ C A I It w b 9 r �x m a A 7o z n I+ C m -1 D 7o O n m — m D m o -C t">s. S o y z o I C I O x a z n m 'm -, -I i n m -t r A X -I I m .i i b I m D I \I A •9 N ~ s t v : n •c Tat •I A -4 A m Yf� i m O O 2 I I i m r z r S 1' 3 c \ S 1 VVVVVV A mr D 2 q r N A m l m m �- tP 44,,Z.--..) m O n S • I s m Z 2 m A r 31 s •o o i c x r „ .. t m z n D oxm m c x 2 o D N s I N r n n a r m m -4 xi 1 b m w N m i t 4. N a n 2 p A I 70 K o A a ►. n t ( A I Ird w O •• -I 1 m N O I i D 1 t L N a c nn 1 O3> 411 2 11,,�V w S T C N `00 /Arl G C N X. " N O - C A •• \O C N 2 1 r N z o w i n N P o P N K A Z H M m m p N D to m I ( w• G �I S G o m S O o a 1 2 ro O m •F .. O -1 2 •• " o o m .- a c o c 1 •G b N •o r 1 = u•1 IG � Cs m c i I� � m D � 1 1 I O Z O 1� O A n ►� I I t� i Ir`l) m i -1 1 C N A C '(` 1� r 1 i ► I� �J� m 73 t I,` D o I�`" « 1 s o p o 140 c o m 1 ` a a iv 1. M G n l c. C 1' I 73 C a o W MC H a y i 2 1. `� o m m -4 S I 0 = n N m � A a .• •• ►' � N P C S 2 9 m T 43 I m O s 2 a 2 03 M i`Cl Z 2 m m 2 Ip I 2 A Cc O A I %I MI MI E 2 : : M O Z b v o • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 1 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • fil a a a a a a a a a = t1 W W W W W W W W W C A ro Co m Co CO Co Co Co Co 01 Y A N O 0 0 0 O 0 O O o m a o N 0 to 171 01 01 f f f IN Z O N f W N r O 10 m V A V ro X r S C1 O O n a a ro a O C b a A -1 a w CO r V C G to f A K �1 M w I- A H y m r m N Cif m p A r •••11 17 A A 111 O 11111 n n a m V = A A O s K a r z 0 0 x m o z H In O C b H V b D A ►� �+ a ro K 2 x o r m m o t A as N a AY OAm ntaI- X O r. y M n r- J 10 CO O 030 1003 V P 000 Z Z 0 X1 10 m C 10 m 1003 z >rz m SSS CC % mC ✓ O N f 10 W 10 10 0 10 O O O O MO \O Z f W N P W P cti o. m m CO Co 1� Y M m M O M el O f W P f W W W N W W W m n q N �( r V q W N 'Co 010 Aln bm O A O O N N N N N N N N P P P P �1 Ir r. f N q 0 01 f f f V V V V a s 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 A ✓ r 1D 10 10 b 1O 10 10 r M Ns H b n O O O O O O O O O O r r- r r 03 0 P P i V V V V W W W 10 10 10 10 ro C N. No • r r r r f f f N N N N "1 Z 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 P a Co P P P P P P P P PPP O W W W W W W W W W W W 01 0 0 to Z P P 1O 10 10 10 0 P W W W t C O O V m Co Co C> V V V O W W W 7 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I b CO n n f m m m m f f f A m n n V 10 .O 10 t0 .I V V ` 70 •-• r r. r. N P N 01 n 11 11 N 11 11 11 II 'n O u u II n u N n n as p n 11 II 11 11 11 11 0 11 11 If 11 it 11 a II m m N II n n n N n n n n II N 11 n u N rr .r 11 11 11 r- r 11 � r- 4 r- n Il r r u = 11 11 II r. r 11 r r 11 r 11 11r • 11 a b 0 r 11 II W W u 0 O b V V II O f P a 10 W W W u O 0 u = 70 t0 P 11 W W 11 N N 11 V V 11 V V 11 N NW 11 P N N N 11 a P 11 W r- r+ r O A • 11 • • 11 • • Ili • 11 • • 11 • • • 11 • •W li • • ll 11 • •o II It m • '14, i • z 2 q 01 11 m m 11 O O II O O II O O 11 O 00 11 O O O O II 10 10 11 Co O 01 W H -1 O 11 m m II O O 00 O 11 O O 110 00 II O 000 HO O HP N f O 10 II 11 11 11 II 0 N 11 r O • • • • • • • • • • • • • . . • . • . • • 1 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • D D D D D 9 D 2 S 1. Y Y M 1r M r 2D D W W W W W W W CA 9 Co 0) CO In CO Co Co 2 A N O o O o O o O m a o r O W Co V O O 72S A Si 2 2 2 2 2 '0 O b A •i h A i L A 111 .( w V N O O m e A m o m �1 T m o K Z 0 m m A 2 -4 A a Ir S C T O 2 A C Z 2 0 C r a A 2 70 2 Ott ►I D 1. N O w D r a A O O w y 4 A 2 A w r N w 2 02. el AX O so 072M OAT A 2 II i r 9 A y 0 N PG A O to W W W W W u W W W W W W W N N Os 22 o.mg, p O Z NNNNNNNN r r W CC 10-T C W N WW WW W W WNOIt * W W Os 06 N 2O \ O2 r V 0 m ♦ W O w W s s WOO ♦ s N O 004 04o .4 s0 N O O r IO T A No < O O O N AM 00 OA O N 000000000000 : O 0 r T 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 V O O n N VC N r ♦ bet 1+ O 1. r Ir M0 N W 0000000000000 O V 0 '12C O ♦ 0 00100000411 to 00 to .. N O 042 - 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11. 1 1. 1 1 1 1 1 t S O 0 0000000000000 01 0 OI O N W W W W W W W W W W W W W W `O W N 02 W V N N N N N N N N N N N N N ! R N 4. C O ; 0000000000000 O O O 2 40 M M OM V F O CA r Is I. 0 y II 11 1 11 N 11 11 11 AO It II 1 11 11 11 is is D D 11 11 1 11 U 11 11 11 O II 11 I /1 11 11 11 U MIT N II I N N N is N Si 11 11 11 N 11 n r n II II I It It II M Pt 11 n IC II 11 1 11 11 U . . N 0 > > O O N N 11 1 II CO s s l.' s 11 ON N 0 us MA 0 II O 01 OWIW U ♦ s WOW NNW 0000sy1 004 V $10 I0 0 ow OA \ O 0 N ONIM U W 0004400000040N C) UM N N0 0) 11 V V U3/41 0 > O U • • n • I • 11 • • • • • • • • • • •- • • • 11 • • n • • U • • n • = 2 o ma O II O 1 O 11 s s 000000N0m VJ0 ♦ U0 O 00 m UN N 00 SS \ O 0 O 0OIO O U ♦ 000000000400Ns ISO O UN N 00 O 0O 0 11 U 1 11 0 0 0 0 1 NO • • • • • 0 • ♦ • • • • • • 0 • • • • 0 • • 1 , • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 6 a a a a It i m m m r r Z a W W W W W C 70 T m Co CO 0 0 0 A O a a a a a my 0 a N a W N XS S C C C S A Z O O A •i N o C O K M i t t m m I7I N N N C A S K m S n n • m m m O C C Z ✓ r m n a a m a m m z m m 1 NA n 2 ✓ mr m K O Oa y M n ,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p O zz 0Ag O X222222 S S 2 x Y 222 m m 44 V CC m SO \02 0 m p� m a ♦ N O O O O O N m M O M N OD m 0 N 0 O P N W W N N N s 2 MM 004 IO N N N P O V V Ip a00 m CO CO m M 73110 O m OA m P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P r o m o .4 .4 .4 -4 .4 .4 .4 .4 .4 .4 .4 .4 .4 .4 .4 .4 .4 .4 .4 .4 .4 .4 .4 .4 IO g- or. I l l l l i l l l l l l l l l l l l l l I rM I H a rm O n M . . . . . O m O . c000 ooNO �OiOt o �OID %OctiO *O cOiOvOIO V p T C N NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN N N N N O m M Z 1 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 1 1 1 1 1 1 m P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P 000a P P a a O W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W N W 02 ` O 00000000000000000000 0000 O O i 1 1 1 1 1. 1 1 1 1- I 1 1 1- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I l' p 7o f 11 O C o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o O o 0 0 O A n n n n n n n n n n n n 1.. ✓ r r r r r r r r r r r n u H 0 n TO 1 u u n n u AA O 11 n n 11 ON II II II II II m A n II II 0 n 11 II 0 II II N66 II n II II II Y 0 0 0 0 II A A O O 00 m 11 0 Il r m Y A O O W W Om N M IO m a N 0 0 0 m m m N 0 .4 W W 11 N N no O O p \ u m m ti ca p NON �0a � p pd NON drop up 0MW O 00 vnN N C A O 11 • • n • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • II • • • • • n • • 11 • • 22 0 O 0 m OW ' d ONOOSOaSeeamN Wdd PNON 0S mNlO W Om m 110 m N44 \ Ho m um PMOi" IONN •s000 .6 0NON WON N 1n m *OOMO N d d ; WO O O O 0 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • I • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • r r s r r b Z 01 m m 0 W 2 73 A N 0 O O O O O O D O V• O sO - O V I A V 9 m m N 2 9 x r r M -c n o r m m O A o m n N N o r m m C M 0 c m a o r n K m x m m m C N N m M 2 c z m r o n n m m r a r X C m 0 n M M M • z o z 20 n Z 0 OD N Ar M 0720 Z Tar n Z o mm Qp po Mz pn mo a 0 xxx 2 x X22222 222 m 8C 2 " 2 m m O V W W W W W W W W W W W W W N - s O \ 02 10 N IO 000 0 O 004 .4000 ♦ 00 0 01.6 OMB O V N W 0 w r O N O m 01 O m00 N N MO M O S i N O W W 0 0 000Vw10 N VM O A m bm OA h. M 0 O 0000000000 0 0 0 0 000 0 r 9 1 I I 1 t l l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 C ♦ ♦ ► r A 00 M •. r O r MO 9 V ♦ 4 0 10001010 0N0.0 00001000010 V N C M OO N s N N N N N N N N W N N N N N N N N N O Z 2 II 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ti D MO a 0 000000000000000000 a o r W W W N W W W W W W W W W W W W W WWW W W N 02 00 s W N WC V 00 N W 000000000000000000 O Z 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 to .d r n mm a N n o0000000000oo0oogo ` a r o rrr r 'rrrrrrr r O ,• 11 11 0 H II MO II 11 II 0 0 0 242$ II 0 0 II 11 11 n •1 II II 0 11 II 0 m M O II 0 11 II 0 I Hs 11 11 0 0 II 1 w n 0N 11 II II 11 I. 11 1 r II r 11 0 0 11 r II I DA O H W 11 r 0 HWW 0 00 r r W 0q1 r 'I 11 ZGG p 10 li t m 0 00 n O 0) 0 4 0 O A 4000 VrarwOOsO W OOUO V 0 0 0 1 C � 0 11 • 0 • • • 11 • • 11 • • n • t • • r • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • - 0 • • 1 Z Z 0 1101 MO 00 0 .4 V HO O HO 1 OWV VN0101rt ♦ I0VNWWOA 0 00 0 VO4 \ 0 ♦ N O 00 11 ♦ ♦ n0 O II N 1 ♦ `000cO0Nawoomcomw IO 11 iO c IO O 11 0 0 0 I - 0 1 A • • • • • • 0 • • • • • • 0 • 46 • • • 0 • 0 . 1 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • l a N S - 2 y o A O n 9 1/ ' -ai m 4 S Z 1 { m �Of A X 73 ]O1 -1: N / 11tttt,,�� m 2 9 m n y AI m C m T O �/ XO ( m A . v n o z or w o 1 1� r ! .t O 2 A 'I 01 fll y a I `a r -I N C M � 2 w NI N y O N T o f x N m s w o0 o s o m w ��` (vt y m A w y i O y C 1 A P- O 1` O D T 1 ~ � Z O 'j*\\ t ! T w A U Z O TI d O S rnn K 1 1 O y t7 ! ��lll 1rf N 1 b 1 1 A A ��1,,, X y Z I O m A 1 n 11 HI 9 O L`!� T t D Of D ic1 1 r -----lb- O ! ro T Iti�\v w O z w Z a ici -4 _I,, A `\ A A O A 11 A 70 n o N O CO T \�\x �. O 1 x rn x c IN o z 1� o i p "' i . 1 O T m N -� 0 T m N r A .4 1 1 m N K A 1 CO a \ I AA A 1•I N 2 t CO S n { 91 O 1 A N A M K M O O2 I Z K m r DX 2 2 O ,., 2 ?0 1 70 w A 2 O r y A SI 2 � It o c o r sr v 1 $ '" N m 2 n a o7Aom PO 1 W c 1 A 1� z O a y i0 X a y -1 r n T A r I 1 T I M A 1 v m Si y w t m Si 1 y a t1 z o A I A 4 O F 02 w n I ` At ! 4 O * N 1 1 1llis a� m y O 1 I -q DI IS Z y MC n I O N 'mA 1^ N O f C A w \In C 1 r y X dw �w O 9 N y � 1 z .r O n qy { N A m O 1 1 y S y �-1D Z N 'll 1 11� m m O S A g0 m! wCT ! l1� CNmxOOFnOArI I nN O ; m_ Mxzn oumiv io . P. , m ci�Q i m a -mi{ 1 o0 o x o w tC� m -c i • y .- r. • M ,21 m o f = oo .. o s 72 ix Pk m c em+ C5 C 1 1 A O IgZT- ICn x m a D 1 �'� Z •• �, A y m m { n H m 1 C � s .. « 2 21 a w m b 1 N Co i 44 _+ M O 2 2 A Z K �(� 2 � m m Al t 1 K S 1�1 0 A Ar Z 1 1 I S O 2 1 • • m m N O • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1 L .. NW .. wr •r. ler -111r-111,—_-Mr .R .� lir nor -ter .w. "Tr �w. ,wp• ' yr _ .' Wr ,. � L - Y s a Y Y .. r Y Y (J tr W U W G 4 W W 41 C A S C p CD C Q 2 ¢ GD Q R S A N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y C J O N N N N N N N N N N r' z O 'C C -1 C !: ? 4: N Y C S H � C T c' D D D D b S ? Z' Y -i �1 ? 1 r o F r -{ --- T h V, r r7 m r { c -i C. Y —4 C X T. o r it r r _ Yr Y N rm x S 0 •. A n -e C r_ L N C _ r V Z G Y { .. D - 2 i r 1,• �1 n r f r r c r c. c �. C i - 1 o, ^ z L' _ r 7) f r. . n r. .• ti i .-. c - o C. - . f C 1. ^ ` d . t i • • • • • • • • • • • e • • • • • • • • • b b b A A A A a b b 1[ t .. r r r r P. IS r r 2 D A w w u u w w u u u u C 7o 13 CO CO Co CO 03 C CO rn a 0) S A N r r r r r r r r r r C A O N N N N N N N N N N m z o 10 a V O V r fr N r O A r C C O A A Ti b b A b 'C r b A r r 2 S S r o a ✓ 1 A T. P 0 m in C r K C -1 n r -I a A A T. b m m • r r a. A m 2 A N •. n !1 r O C s = n H a z o r < - a z a r 0 - s w o z r a c C m r ` ` o A C a n (n c c a z s w n z v .. m r m c z N O N A N A Z VI N a a A z 0 O A m • -Ilb r 2 •- M r n O O L: O 10 O O r O O ^ 2 O A C 0 W O V P 10 O O O O a C 10 m C O O O O .r O L! A •• •' O C \. n s V V 0 V LI V N CO V V Owl O r r IC `4 N V T c` V ID •- r f' n V N •C O O O IC O r C W A m �`d 10 m O A V V O V O V O O O O m .J IC r V V W r ir r r C a I I. 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 n .Oh N r r r N we r we O n 4- O s, r o r o r r m 0 r W N N 10 r r r N N ro C O r O L✓ N N O t 41 4: .4 7.1 I I I 1 I 1 1 1 I I r P O 0 01 P P O. P O, 0 O I•• r N W. W r W W N OI CI 2 t T 10 d { a V 4: 10 10 L C ✓ V V0 V N 41 O O 10 10 2 I 1 S C r V A m O b c A . n 11 11 I 0 it ❑ 11 n II 11 m c n u n m u n u u it a s 11 II 0 11 II 11 11 11 11 n ti II II II II II II II II II m m II II ll II II II II II II U II II II II II II II II •• •• • II II 0 II II II II II II Z 11 11 11 II 11 11 11 II II a A O r II N N 11 r r 11 N N 11 It 11 r ... II r ► 11 II a A V P 11 N N 11 r r II N N 11 V V it r r Il r r II V V J II im r O .73 v. 111 11 V V 11 N N 11 N N II P 01 II t t 11 we r II V V 11 CO 0) 11 O O C A O • II • • II a • 11 • • 11 • • 11 • • 11 • • 11 • • 11 • • 11 • • a 2 V O ❑ O O 11 O O 11 O O 11 O O 11 IO V 11 O O 11 O O 11 N VI 11 N N r H V. O II O O II O O II O O II 4: 41 II CO m 11 O O II O O 11 4: W 11 O O V II 11 11 11 N 11 11 11 11 ► O • • • • • • • • 0 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • a a a a a a a a a le r r r w. r r .. r •• z a a W 41 W td 14 CJ U W W C x '0 CO CO W CO CO CO 07 0: O 2 z N •.. 1- w r •• .. r •• C a o 4I 4: W U W 1: W W N f:: 2. O J P OI A C. N •• O •0 x N '0 n n n n to n c m a 13 o r s z c x x r •• a IT z -4 CO M A G < p a Iti p •• r Y N O m n N 2 m -1 S T. fr p H ..• m A � r r ta•• mm 3 N N A 2 C z co N < -I - A •• n •• 7 x m m x D C7 2 A X m h •+ a.. z - 1:1 r m r z a O z •C n T n rr T, - O D a D n • A IT a x N a r z x • o z m 1 7 D r 2 0 •1 1, I» n J P 0 N N •s N w O S O 3 J U 2 2 O x g IC V A N N CO N O b A O •. A V C C •0 m •• 00 00 N A ? O C C O 41 J = 0 'N C S I AO2 4C 0. O O r V r T N No O O r Oh •1 L! C V.) A A V ,T. V N r Ki C r n V N K 0 m o x 1 00000o 0 0 0 0 O O J N O O O O 7 .O r r sa r •- p A 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 n N NNNNN N 0' t P " r N N C n f w o A 4:, o O 1- is, to 0 i •• N •. a 0 • um,• •. C I+ a r r 0 r O N O O r r 0 0 S 2 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 "I P Cis a 00 O' a P P 0% a P 00 O 41 W W 41 4 41 10 •• r 41 4: 41 41 W 0 r 00 T 0 V C A •C A V a V •• •• L C 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 O N W 14 O to Na 7 c I n n n n a n n D L t x m I 717377M0 7a n r aD c V 1 MI M N •. 'S H •/ IN M C- 7 7 2 2 2 r r 11 11 11 It t N It 11 n S C II n II 11 11 11 II 11 D To I II 11 11 11 11 11 II 11 n .d 11 II II II II II II II in CO II II II II 11 II II II 11 11 h 11 II It 11 11 •• •• 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 II S 11 II 11 11 11 II II II D a O 11 N a 11 11 •• •. II II II 11 11 •• 2 x IO •• r r 11 r •+ 11 •. •• 11 O O II 1•• n W W 11 0 m It N r r U 0 O x O N 'O CD A K! II d d 11 P 0 II O O II 0 44 U N N 11 W W 11 ON a r II N C D O • • • • • • 11 • • 11 • • 11 • • • • • 11 • • II • • II • • • • • 2 2 V NO W W N P N h N P 11 O O 11 O O 11 O O 11 %O VII HO O 11 A MN) 11 0 < -1 V. CC A 41 V •. CO 11 0 O II O O n 0 O 11 O O II O O 11 O O 11 a •• a 11 0 .O 11 11 11 II 11 11 It 11 N O • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • b . b b b 7> b b b b r X r r r n r r n r 2 b D I U U U U U U U U W C a -0 C 0: Co Co Co Co Co 0: Co 2 X N I I.• r .• IS r n n r r C A O t A w j a t a a f4 m -2 O I O r U N •• O NO G V a i b m m m C o C n n n t M a ei r o z z `O t a c a m r z a r .+ r v n m I x N X .• N w m n m 1 C - a m A O I 2 .N X7 a+ r RI m m r. m m .. 1:, .. n m t z c el 7C n 2 2 C 2 A n X7 t m A t A .• C X N w 1 m t n b -i N .+ r b n -+ n ti C .I t O 77 r • 7 a r -0 Z a -1 -- A X O N A m r Y � r a r A O n ~ n O O o 0 7c O P O a m Iz 2 2 O a O O to O O T so N .p a a V! C C 0 T C O r n O O U O a r C - C \ a 2 ✓ V V V 10 V O. V O a r C n O 1•I -i O 10 r r 0 i0 0 •0 a• 10 CO m n V N K N O ♦• n O O N O a R. \ -1 •O m O a O V O O O V N V O O O ITI .• b r r r •C r y On w r O A 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 n •• a n n N N OI .- r r r r n -• •• •• n r •• N O 0 0 0 m 0 N P N N r r as r N a Cr -J C U O U U O o O t 0 n n -{ Z. I 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 N T P O, P O e P a a s ON O ✓ P• N N U7 as N r N N N O 2 .O P so 0 O A d n N OI L C 4:, U O 10 •O U O U O O o 2 1 1 1 I t C n o r r X7 m w n I- O a C H -1 C- ✓ m. m 11 II 1 II 1 11 11 I 11 11 1 b C II 11 II I 11 11 I II II b b 11 11 11 I 11 11 1 11 II a V 11 a II I II II I II 11 m rn 11 11 u I 11 II I 0 lI II 0 11 I II 11 I 11 U •. .. 11 p 11 1 11 II I 11 II X II 11 II t I II 11 11 11 it A a O 11 II n r P 1 I 11 11 11 II N n II 2 X! 10 11 N N 11 r r Ito, I n 01 1 II U U I' M Co 11 U U 11 P 0) P N 11 V O F � 11 r n 11 U W no 1 00 I 10 10 I I U U 11 V V 11 O O II b U I's U I I ♦ C A O 11 • . 11 • • 11 • 1 • • 1 • • 11 • • 11 • • 11 • • 11 • • • • 11 • 2 2 V 11 0! CA 11 n r 11 NO 1 IO O IOU N 11 N N 11 O O 11 O O 'IN 00C] II V 1 -1 -/ \ II I0 V' II U a lie I 0o I O O II P P II U U 11 O O 11 O MK) * II W t 10 II 11 1 11 1 1 11 11 11 I 11 11 1 GI O • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • e • • • • • • • • o • • • • • • • • • • • s b- W Cu W W W W W W W C A '0 CO Ib R m a 6 CC C _m 3 33 N r r •. lw •. •• r r O a O N N U X P P a a a n z o d W N r O v0 Ct V P F 9 A n n 0 n O •tl m m 9 b S C O 1.• m F O O a Ir, m vo t m o r F X K rn m o C a a -1 C r m r r a 1n o r rn r m 0 m a •c -c 9 o r m o m a a c a 2 r o a x A n t ti o a is r •d C a a N . 0 N b w N N "1 w r 2 r o - I. .+ o •e n c r o o a a _ c w r i a a Y N r x r n r c r . 2 a m a N 4 n c z xi m r 2 z •• . p -e n a x m c N a r r A A x i n O O z m n m xar m • w Z .• -1 w n a P V. N O O a o o a A O — � 0 A 0 ✓ V V r O O N O in N in O c C vO m C P. C d r r r r o r O O = c \ O 2 C a a a V V a r V N v:0 V m r O r .4 W a V o 0 P TT N W NO N r n V V1 K O 0 0 P 41 n N V O N F r \••1 tp T O A O O O O O O O O O Z O P -1 ✓ r r r .• r m r a r r a Z. I ( I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I n e r r N t+ ... N r d N N O n . . . .- r - .• o o W r NO m O 0 IP UI r N N r N N r •� a 9 C a O a O Cu W N P O •• O N ti t 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 I P P P P P P P P P P P P O W W W W N N N r W N N V co 2 W 4: 4 •' o `G N W N lT 143 ' L C ✓ V V N NO .O O N N O NO O z 1 I 1 1 9 01 L 'p n n A m a a O •. C F ti N S C L m s r It 1I I 11 11 It II 11 II ro C II II I II II II 11 II II c a It 11 1 11 11 11 11 11 11 o -1 11 11 I Il II 11 11 11 11 rn rn 11 II I II o 11 11 ti 11 II 11 I 11 II II 11 11 11 N N 1• •• 11 II 1 11 11 11 II 11 11 P P X II 11 I II II II II II 11 � � a a O It W. 11 N N 1 11 a a 11 II II r r II 11 V V 3 A tp 11 O t N W II V V 1 a (d r 11 ► r 111 , ga, II r r 11 ♦ r /I 11 V V O A 11 W O C W II CO CO la OW 11 N N 11 P P t1 CO Co 11 N N II NO 40 It ♦ a C a O II • • • • II • • In en 11 • • 11 • 1 • 11 • • II • • 11 • • 11 • • 2 z V !IN P CI P 11 C1 Co 10 00 11 O O 11 O 1 O 11 a i 11 b d 11 W W II O O •-1 -1 � II O 000 110 O ID N 4 110 O II O 1 O 110 O 11 N N II a a 110 O ND II 11 1 11 11 1 II II 11 11 a O • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 0 • • • • • • .• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Xis p p p p D Z Z a X L r. r or r r r r r P. Z p b 41 W W V W W !J ' W W C A 9 CO Co C 0 0 CO C Co C 3 x N r r r r r 4n r V r m 0. O P P P P (11 0 P 0 41 m Z o W N A O 0 C V P 0 X -I 17 L Ai S S S 2 S 0 P ro p r. C C O m p x A p Z S N 0 m x x m m. -! -I \ •1 2 0 b A m m t11 r+ r r m .N p O 2 m .. N m m r w • r O A K K y 3 A •i 1 •1 N Y N 0 r •( X A 0 m m m m `r x r Z -4 0 =+ M r. 0 A K a 41 C1 o x C N { r Z p r ♦*1 X. t X 0 N D x L O O F m x +1pr o .. At H n o A A x Cr o N .. A a z `� 0 7C o co o o -t N `c. 0 r u C C 0 MC W N V O P. W 0 a P s = O \ 0 2 O V' .3 W W N CO V V C 0 M OD'. r 3 C 0 IL 10 CO N A O m A -go -C .+ co V O A A C x m \~ V 1^ O X O P P P P O O O O 0 O O 11 .. V V V V r. r r r. C A •• O p 1 1 1 1 l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 n w r r I. r to r. •• N N N N O n O .. r � P. r O O 40 .. 10 iJ r O A 0 W OO A P N r r r r .0 C A NNNN O r N O N O O H Z 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ti P P 0 P P Cr. P P P P a P O 41 P P P P N La ,L W N N N tr T V N •• N r 10 P r V N r N � C O 0000 10 O O O O O O 3 1 1 1 r• X CO C A N O L F C r m r I It It 11 II II 11 II 11 X O 1 is II 11 II II 11 11 it p 3 1 11 11 11 11 11 0 11 11 O H 1 11 11 11 0 II II 11 11 m m 1 It II II 11 11 11 11 11 1 II 11 11 II 11 11 11 II as r• 1 II N r 11 II 11 r r 11 11 11 11 L 1 11 � y 11 11 II 11 11 It 11 p p O 1 11 V A 10 N 11 11 I . r 0 V V 11 11 11 11 x D b 1 0 N II r CO CO a 11 • r 11 N N It A A 11 Al V 11 N N 11 N N 0 P P O x N. I A A 11 P V r 1. N 11 C C It N N II C C 11 r r• 11 10 N1) 11 C Co O N N C A O I • • II • • • . • 11 • • II • • 11 • • II . • II • 1 • II • . It . e 2 2 V 1 P P II r C r d N II CO CO II V V II P P 11 N N II a I A 11 Cc 0 It P P —i H \ IC O II V 4t V NO II A A II N N 11 as A 11 O O DO 1 0 00 1 0 0 A A 0 I 11 11 11 0 1 II II I II 1 II 0 O 1 1 I I 1 I I I 1 A 1 0 • • • • • • • • • • • ♦ e • • • • • • • • I • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • IP r r � Ps 7 a b W W W W W W C A 9 CO 0 0 N 0 O 2 2 N .. r m r r .. o a a a Cr a a a a m z o b m v Cr‘ N ! x .-1 v X X X X X t b .. IT, I I I m A z m s 2 7 A K c m a a A o m m Z Z A 2 m N W H M r o n o c 1 1 n b m O m 11 is a N m a 0 O O D N N C N C 7 AT ✓ OA r or K m70 m A r z O .. .y r n r r •. ,.. N000 0 0 n 7 O M O W V a ! ! ! s a ! . . . . . ! ! ! ! ! ! N000 0 O cc b m C W V. o V. t.7V V. aao omooN V o0 + w rrr Wr 7 0 \ oz O V V V V V V V V a N N N ! ! + ! N N N N V V V ow C` r O .+ N N V 00 tit r 4- r N V V V N N N ! N N N ! N ++ O ON M n V OK ✓ VC W N ! W N W W N r W N 0 b ! N r O *- 4.) b n t0 A h: \-4 b m OA O M N N NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN 0 0 0 0 MM 7t r a r w r ► . w .r a s oz. 1 1 it I t l l l l l l I l t l l l l l Mt 1 1 it n N N 00 a- a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a N r r r NN CO W W a.. 0 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a r r r w J W Tr, O W r ! a t r NNN r r S C O r O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r W w W r r y 2 1 1 II IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 1 1 1 1 1 1 •'1 ON a a s a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a s O N N NN NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN N a 0 a N N a 2 N a N N NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN N000 b b No W c N O .' r 0000 00 Y 1 II I I I I l 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 MO n b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b n n mm 2 O = 2 It It It II 11 To 1 It 11 11 II II A A 11 II 11 11 11 n •-• u it n to to m m II II II II II II II II II 11 •• •• II 11 II II 11 r n II u u 11 AA O W II W W t1 11 in. 11 11 N N 2 70 b O HO 0 tl DO r no N no ♦ O .0 \ r II N N II a W W no N NNN lt)1 ♦ ! mr lV bN ! b no W rr b II ! 0 + co O • It • • II • • • 11 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • III, • • • • 11 • • • V N it N N UM NO 11 V m O N S W OI V V a b W a b a 0 N no N O W a no 0Q H \ i N NO O II r NQ OW ! ! ! ao + NNec o o0a0 r tl r rON a no ! r .0 II II 11 11 11 a O • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • a a a a a a a a a s Er r t+ r r r r r 2 b u u GI W W W W u W C A 9 co co _ A N r r It. In. r r t+ r I.I CO a O V V V V V V V V 0 m Z O ✓ a a t GI N •. O .G R -1 b ✓ r r r r 7 7 X 7 D O C a a A r C A .. b ` C n s m ... 'C11 0 1 < X a •. 0 m r y -1 •• A t R` r m X •• m N 1 O O CI O O r O S T- O 2 0 A a N C A C 2 A 2 b c 0 a r A m ✓ � Z A K m m t el m a X C A a z A N A K 23 r Clam T A r 2 O •• N M 0 .• r A O 0 0 0 A A Z 2 O A O CO C C P 44 .P -rt 0 O O O t t c c •O to c s 4' 4. 0 0O 0 •G 0 .. •• 0 0 = c SOS G N N W N N .G •O V V V •O •0 m t•. O •• —0 Co GINO 0 W to V .0 r r .0 .O m 0 V N K O •O O P O O O A m \-1 .0 1' O A 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 O V O O O O T r •. •• - r V V 0. I+ .• l•-• r O a I I I I I I I I I I I I I I r N N N N N N N w •• t+ •• r N N 0 r u W W W r •• I- Y I+ O P. t+ r I+ m O fJ IJ .. m •• •. I- 10 .0 .- N N •• y C O 000 r. •-. O N N .. U (.I O O -1 Z 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 -, P 00 0. P O 0 0 P 0 0 0 a 0 O NNNN N N VI W N m. O N N N m 2 N NNN N N •O 0 � t IO .0 .0 NO 4 C N NNN O O •O O N CJ .0 .0 b .O 2 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 9 0 X X 0 0 0 C) CI A m H ••I 'A A H H PO C A t 'II .. n C C C L C C 3 X r r r 11 11 It 11 11 11 11 11 9 O 11 II 11 II 11 II II 11 a b 11 II II 0 11 11 11 11 0 II 11 II It 11 II 11 II m m II II II II II 0 II II II II 11 II 11 II II 11 •• •• II II II It I) II 11 II Z II II II II II II 11 II a b O w N 11 11 II IA N 11 r r 11 11 II II W Z A .0 r r N O II N r 11 t+ •• II N V m 11 N N 11 W N II It 11 O O A \ V V 0 0 II O O .O II O 0 II N ON 11 O O 11 N d 0 11 t71 N It 07 O II M. C a O • • • • 11 • • • II • • II • • • II • • II • • • 11 • • II • • 11 • V 0 W O r 11 Cr •O a 11 O O II a Oa II O O II 01 O W 11 N 01 11 N 01 11 0 V H \ .0 •O •O 0. 11 P W GI b 0 O 11 t 0 4. 11 O O II r Ir O 11 m CO 11 N N ll N 1 .0 It 11 II 11 11 II 11 11 1 V O 1 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 41 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • b b b b a a a 1 IC IC Ps r Is r r r IS 2 b b W u W u u u u e A ro CO a a CO a CO a 2 A N .. .. r r r a b o a co a IL V V V m 2 O Gs: N r o W CO V A -I t 2 2 2 2 2 r r t r m m n b O O D ( A A o o m m m O o N _ m � � m m e a m a 1 1 n r .. t ro _ r a b m u r c c -I o o a r r r a m o x m 'n m - C b b n n - S A O 2 3 2 m t A. G b C C L A A Is w X .. I.4 b Z t A A Vl b CI 2 t -C A I • IT, O A m tar -I 2 b •• y M n I O N A A A 77 0 ,30 G: (Al n t r, W W W W W W IC W W W 0 Co a C a CO CO C C W m C O al O O ‘0000 .4 V V V V P O, CrV A Os 1 v a. C \G1 C I N 0 ID V r W Os to G Os (.2 N N 0 N o 0, t t P N C r O it. •4 VI W W W V •L OIL V CO VI 41 N V t W W O VI W P m n V GA -C O O O A I* \V ID m O A P O O O O 00000 O O O O O O O O O O O O "I V .. A. .. r r .. b L 1 ! 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 IIIIIIIIIIII n r N N N N N N N N N NNNNNNNNNNNN C n r r r Is L W W W Cu 14 fv W O W {r (.I W L 4l W W fr1 O I 10 Is r r r W r y1 r (.1 r r {.1 .r r r (.1 .r l.I r r r '9 C N •' O O O 00000 000000000000 •I 2 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 IIIIIIIIIIII M a 01 e P 0 Os P C ON P 0 OI e P a 0% P O Os Os P O. O I N N U Cn N NNNNN NNNNNNNNNNNN a 2 r N W W W N N N N N NNNNNNAJNNNNN L C 1 N O W c 10 N N NNN NNNNNNNNONNN 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 II 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 S a n n n n X 7. X X XXX X X X X A M A r r r H -I H -I •i -I -I H -I -I -I O A r C C C 11 't1 it 'n n -n YI T '11 -1 n L 2 r r r c o co bob c too II 11 11 11 11 II t b 11 11 11 11 II 11 D M II 11 11 II 11 11 0 N II II II II II II m m it u u u u n u u u u u n .. .. u u u u u Il r = II II 11 II II 11 .e It b O I 11 11 11 II 11 N r 11 r Is n 2 A W P 11 t at II 11 11 r r II P r V r at N 11 IY Cn 10r N ID /nr 01 NO W O A \ O II r r 11 W 10 II W W DO O 11 CO (40 •40N II P. O O V O O O V O O O O O C b O • I I • • 11 • • 0 • • I I • 1 • 0 • • • • • • 11 • • • • • • • • • • • • • Z 2 V O 11 r r • r r II V V 11 O 1 O II P W O W r as II V O O W 0 0 0 W o W O O O •1 •1 \ o II CC ac 11 N N II Co CO II 0 1 0 11 W WO W r a 11 ON N V 10 10 V ♦ 10 0 Co 10 t V 10 11 11 II II 1 II 11 CO O • • • • • • • • • • s • • • • • • • • • • s • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • A D D D D D D D D D >; r r r r .. r-n r I+ 2 A W G: W W W GI W 44 W Ir C A X O CO CO O CO m O m CO CO S A N r mi r .. ni I'. r r r r C A O 10 IO m P C W CC m a m r. x O N r O N0 a V P P ♦ G: A ti b ❑ 2 2 2 S '� S S 9 A O O O T0 O O r N A O A A S i .'7 A 7O A A -C A N ti -1 -I A D A A rtl n 2 S Z O r. C ❑ O n: 74 m m T r 2 N O A d A A A z r rn 2 � co n u) Z 2 A S T n A D A A O C T O O R H H A N .. ..1 r _ r 3 A •• A C r c o O c m /n r r .t z x s -C a r D D r A - n r C '7 C O C. r A w N .1. Im H r rr, r N A r A ; O is C Z N A .r r S S w r • O Z T r 11 D r n C -4 .. A .. A 'Y O O N T b 10 C C 10 T Z 443 73 C O O N o •- •' O O O O w O \ C `G O t IO N 10 V V V C r O w M ‘0 (0 O `0 IO 10 b T r V N < n o o O O O A T \-d NO r' O A O O N O O O V V V T ✓ r r r r r .0 r0 IO O A I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 rf N N P p. N A r t ❑ O B- a O r r r O P m 0 Am r O M l^. M. t r 'C C O r o r G! O O N O ti x I 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 H Cr P P P P P P P P O ✓ N W W G P .. .- r m 2 .0 O O O V b 4 V V S I I I I b C r r o n A T h+ A •• O A C P. C L ✓ 2 r' II 11 11 II II II II II II II b 0 II 0 11 II 11 II 11 11 II II D D II II II It II It II II 11 II O -4 II 11 II 11 11 II II 11 II 11 T r1 II II II II II II II II II II 11 11 II 11 II II 11 11 11 11 .. .. 11 11 11 II II 11 11 II 11 11 x II II 11 11 II 11 II 11 11 11 A P O 11 II 11 11 ' •' It 11 11 n. r 11 N N 11 N N 11 S 7C .D II 11 CO to 11 r r II O O II 11 r .. 11 V V 11 O O 11 O O II a O A II P P 11 IP N 11 CO CO 11 W G: 11 t { U O O 11 CO CO II O P 11 O O II O C A O II • • II • • II • 11 • • 11 • • II • • II • • II • • II • • 11 • V II t t 11 V V II a N II N N 11 O O II O O II O O II O O II O O 11 O 1 N W 11 O O II O O 11 O O Ir a a 11 I. r II O o it O O 11 O O ti O O it O I IG 11 II 11 11 II II II II II 11 t 10 O • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • o • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • r D D z A A r r r WI W W W W C A '0 (p CO Cc CO C 7C70 N r r r r r VA O .0 .0 •G d .0 M .. O ✓ 0 0 4` W A r '0 t ro v ro ro ro A z m m A A f11 r -1 17 A K T C M M 70 nit In 1 < nt M A 0 O A A D n M A D H C •• Y o z n r A O r 1 R K A co m o t c n z x ✓ 10 n r o O A D Z D m as b -1 r N D r72 ."- O C+ oAm rosy Za r r m n 0 r 0 L L D D D I4 .0 Z 2 O A O CO 0 m C C C C C 0 O CG •0mC 4 0 S r r O O C 0 r 2c \ o x O L O N .0 W N CO Z C r 06,4 .0 0: N N •0 O O N N O m n V o .c ' O 0• pm \ .0 m O A O O O G O O O O G O P r O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O ro r r 4. r r ex, 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I i I i i i i i i i l l l l I 1 n N N I.I N N r V W N r •' W W N N N h r W r W .p W W N N r r r C n W � A V .- 0 y P r O r r r .p I.I r r r r O r O r r yp b 0 O O MO ye 6 O K r lOOr P N * 0) .O rr r rG 4. 4. NOC .0o r r IA 'QC O O O O r r O O r r O N N 0 0 6 r O N r 0 0 0 N O O N 4• r el 2 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 ( 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 rl O P 0000000000000000. 00. 000. 00. 0. 0 0 0 O 4 N W W N N N W N N N N N W (.4 N N N N N N W W N W N N W L: O Y Ir N •.. r N N N r N N e" N N r P N N •' N N N Oi r N r N r V V LC O O 000000OOO .0 •000000 .00 .000 .0000 O O M 1 1 t t t T C 7 n a n In A m c A 2 A m o A 7 r w A L n 3 3 G 11 1 It II it 11 "0G I II 11 11 II 77027 1 II It n 11 0 .4 I 11 It ii II m In I II II II 11 I N N 11 0 n ll e. ... 1 e yy 0 11 0 n AD 0 I r r II II r II II r r 170 .0 1 0. 0 II N N 11 r r II V V 11 0 0 o7; N. I N o It O O 11 O 000 ♦ W Vr W {,ir Cr, 1 ♦ 00 r r a. r (.1 N W 0 V PA It .0 b II I.: W CD O I • • 11 • • II • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • II • • II • • 2 2 V ICJ O Or r 11 0 N000000 .0 .00r000W 000 W 0W 0000 11 ! J• n0 0 H N n O O 0 %0 O ON •000900000 N0 0000e0NNONONNOO r no O no 1 O r .0 11 11 11 11 n I 00 • • • • • • • • • • 0 • • • ♦ • • • • • • 0 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • lb D D D D D D D D 2) r T, •. - .. .4. r. vs. N• 44.42 D A W W W W W W W W W C a ro CO w CO CO CO 0 CO O m 3 S N N N N N N N N - - O: D O O O O O O 0 O 0 .0 r 2 O P 0 ♦ W N O 10 C% A V '0 N CO b a S S S F 73 73 .0 z O O 3 m P S 3 m m 0 A S { c 1.4 aC n m .. a A m m x N a x { a N _ m m Z A o m N n m r D -• C N m A K s = a - m ro .. c i> x -i a c A .• `z r e x b m m A V m .. r rn m -1 ' Pa (1. N • 'p N C •n C ` 1 D M 1.1 O x 73 ro 0C O I. D r •. A A N D -I 2. o O S r n r o x m ✓ o ? Dr z .. s .. A O .. z ,0 o a .• .. 10 W (*INS 3 x 2 Or ❑ CO O m o o N N N •- - Oa 2 .• C G soma Y. O O O ry C O T- SSO O 30 'V C+ : O V 0 D P - 0: W ♦ 22 -1 P CO O w O .• -1 C P 10 N 10 0 0 0 W W r A V N 1 i O N O P Co G - O X) T. � -1 10 m O X) N O O O N O O O O 0000 0, 11 .. be a - N .. - .. - r r+ - In N O D 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 A P N N N N • •- • - NNNN .- C A 10 r - .. N O O O o • • - •- - m O N .- .. r .. .- .- ♦ - s. - - .0 11 C O r O O 0 a a a N - r - - - s 2 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 N a a a a a P P P a PPP P P O W W 1.11 W W W W W 10 w W W W W CO 2 V N 0 •1 .- W W W ♦ P P P P V C. C W O W 0 O 4. - - O •- •- .- •. O 2 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 73 m p w S :0 .73 x 2 O S M P. M M M L r G, 3333 I II it 1 li 11 li 0 1 11 S O 1 11 0 11 li 11 II 11 D D I II 11 11 11 li 11 II 0 .I I II II 11 11 11 11 0 m RI 1 11 11 11 11 11 11 0 1 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 •• w 1 11 11 11 - - 11 11 W W 11 11 X 1 11 11 11 a a 11 0 •1 It 11 11 D D O I II 11 a ♦' 11 O O II II V V 11 11 2 2 O P I P P 11 11 N N II O O II W N 11 b 10 11 N. 11 N N IX A v. N ' so b 11 - - 0 W W 11 O O 11 P CO CO O 11 N N 11 W P 0 N - II P P C D O • 1 • • 11 • • 11 • • 11 • • li • • • • II • II • • • • • 11 • • x z V b II N 0 11 I. - II A t 11 O O 11 10 N N a 11 P P II P 0 0 0 P II O O N { O II 0 O 11 N N 11 V V II O O li V ♦ a 10 11 O O II N O O O N 0 0 O I. 1C II 11 11 11 11 II 11 11 .- O i • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 6- t- � 2 a v W W W W W W W C U '0 CC Co CO CO ¢ CO CO S 70 N N N N N N N N O D O r r r o 0 0 o m � o N r O IO 0 V a A H -0 C r r r N N N 'O O T D r r b D O c r n In D ^I -C c r x m n m y -C r rr, r r 7s r o o x m r 2 H to ft. -C 0 y C. S 0.1 a o o r N O 2 = 2 D -1 7C _ 2 r r r w r -1 O -C r n r r n x r L L r A D r z o D w 0 72 M o "rtAr 2 c •- y H A N O 0 O X7 O O O 2 '- O 2 O r Ir -I oN (L CO C C V fl C W O O O O IO %0 2C �O Z -i O IO V IO O 0 0 Co N Or -I O 0 10 0 0 r 3 T, m n V 0 •C 0 0 0 0 O N r 0 a r \-4 o r o x O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O V O O N N 11 r o r r r 0 A I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 n O N r N N 0 0 C n 0 .- 00000000 0 r w r r .O vzo r1 O N ON NN N r r OP I-, A r b: r N r r r r .- N N '0 C N h- a N C.' r O N r a r N r r 0? O O O O r O O r 7� IIIIIIIIIIIIIII 1 1 1 1 1 1 I -i P sa0aa OIPPOIOIOIPa0a a a o, O Co POD O W W W W W W W W W W W W CA W W N N r N W W W co '- N o • IG r V V L C O 0r r a- 00000000- 0r 0 r t V to a N V 2 1 1 1 1 1 'V Co IO n n o b r m r r O A C C L r r It I II II II It II '0 p II II II It II II a D II 11 II 0 0 II 0 r II II 11 11 It 11 01 fil II It II II II 11 11 II II U II I7 .. .. W r P II 11 II II II 11 L II II II 11 11 11 9 0 O W W CP r N r ! CO 11 N N II II W W 11 11 ♦ ♦ 11 V r Ot 2 A I0 P I-, 0I N ••,1 IT CO i' 0 0 OI V Co 11 a N 11 11 OI OI 11 11 IO C 11 W Co W O 70 \ a 0 V ♦ N V 0 N P • 0 .1 ♦ V V II N N II IO 0 II 0 O 11 N N 0 b IO 11 .0 P V C D O • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 11 • • 11 • • 0 • • ti • • 0 • • II • • • 2 2 V N r tT O W V •- 10 N 01 N N as N Ot II 0 P II O O 00 O II W W 00 O 11 dt• N O —I H \ W Co r r co V N 4-( 44 V N W + O O OW W II 0 S. II O O ON N HO O 11 O 00 r t0 It 11 11 II It 11 N O • • • • • • • • 0 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • A A A D_ D_ I z r r w z p D W W U W U CM 9 O m C 0 O 3 ?I N N N N N N W D O w w w w w m x O a a a W N m -4 9 a C C C a 9 a z • a w a a a -C ✓ -1 • m m m r 9 m a C 3 m O 1 D 0 N m a -i 1 n r N 3 O m. S n D 9 a m 0 S r r 1 _c r r m b C A w A N r n x m a) n a 1 1 C w w O n D z m N A 0 z z O b m m D r z O 0 -4 •t n O O O O O O b O N 72 O A O X .- 5 O O F m n c c C M G TS V a 0 w C O 9 = 0 \ O ,"•, OM N U V V O P 1 Ow ow-1 m m 0 N (0 w O •' 0 m n V0K w O O N w O m V O A m \ 1 CM O X P 00000000 P P P P P P P O O O P 0 P P N N w 0 O 0 O O 0 O 0 0 M V V V s N V V V V w w w .1 0 r O w w 0 r O ? 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 II 1 II 1 1 1 II n w w N N w w w N 0 0 e O W U N N N N w w on r r r w w w 10 P w O V w P W •r r w r no O 0044: 00000 N w w 000 PO OwNOmN ♦ 0 w W N 9C N NNNNNNNN W O O N w V O O O O O O N O O O O o W 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 II 1 1 1 1 O 00000000 P a a P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P O U U W W W U W W W a W W U W W W W W W o W W U U W U W W Q z a d . a r41) r. •nw Nwww w c C 0000000400 O N O w 0 0 0 w w w0 0 0 0 www O w S 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I To ✓ rrrrrrrr r D ‘44 n Mm O OOOCOOOO 0 O C O O O O D C w OM n 00 nn A 3 C c ✓ rr rr z r 11 11 11 11 0 9C 0 n n 11 11 D D n 11 11 11 11 Os it n n it u MM It II 11 11 11 II n n u u •• •• n 0 11 n HO P L O 11 11 11 n w w D D O ha w 0 11 U W 0 00 U O V O w P = X 0 HO 0 P O W NUON Ow w HO N n N N 0O w N W w w O w O a N w p m OM \ n o w O ! P P W P r 0 00 O HO O no O 00 Ns w w N V O m N V N O s V 6 C D O 11 • • • • • • 11 • • 11 • • n • • 11 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 2 2 V II O • P ♦ V 0 ,4 N W V 40 O 40 O 4411 V II P NPPww W POOObw0N00 -I -1 \ 4u V e w 0 P O O m O 4O 0 4O O 40-. w 4N N d P ♦ O N 0 O W w W L4 w W W P rip II 11 11 11 11 I WO • • • • 0 • • • • • • • • 0 • • • • • 0 0 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • A A A A A A A 0 s r r r 2 A A 41 W W W W W W C 70 •0 a CO CO a CO CO 07 Y A N N N N N N N N O A O N N N N r w r m 2 O W N I-2 O 0 a V 70 H ro E 7C S S 7C Y C '17 M, m m A A A r A r r r to r r r •t C n a r -I I r m r r m 3 r IT n n r s a O O S. N N A _ C C m -I r 2 2 r A 3 ^I -I Ir C 3 C IT: d < 2 1.• A r .- C n A 0 r c r ft n n m o w O 3 '0 r A C r r • 1•. 2 -4 7) 2 r .y m -i n it 2 A n ✓ Ill I.. A X n '•1 N A n •I r 0 2 O m 1 C A m C O N i 11 A r 7 C r•• M 0 0 O O 000000 O 0 0 0 0 O 22 O A O 0 CC .0 a atDP P P .0 0000 •O C C V 111O O N O 0 vD0 a6 V O r r r, •• O 3 C \ OS O •D V P A U1 a P W V V V V V V 0 r 0 •• y W .0 .0 P W r N r .0 ID N r r 0 .0 m n V t/1 i a O 0 V O O 0 O V N V O 0 IT V.-4 0 r O 2 0 V 0 0 0 V 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 r N N N II e 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 n N N •• .D .0 IO r r r M. r r r r NNNNNNNN C n W W r 0 0 00 00 O r r r r W W W W W W W W m 0 r W .0 A A A P P P W NNNN NNNNNNNN '0 C O O r G 00 r r r r W W W W 00000000 N 7 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r P P P 0, 00000 P P P P P P P P P P P P P O W W r 41 W W W W W r a 0 VI VI W W W W W W W 47 0 2 •D •0 A .0 .00100, P .0 .D •D •D 0 V 1716 P IT 000 4 C a O V 000000 V 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 S C 0 n n 0 r .4 -Ir 022 p m C 0 n 70AAAtA NT O 70 n N N N A •I O C 4 V '0 C2 Arr 11 II II II 11 II '0 0 II II II II II II A A II II 11 11 11 11 0 r II II II II II II IT IT II II II II II II r II 11 11 II 11 11 r N N N •• •• II 11 11 11 11 11 0 to. r W a 0 W 7C II II 11 11 II II ob •• •• %, gm is gm A A O r II II r r 11 11 r r II r 11 a a' bP0 rtTa 22 417 ✓ II N 0 11 P P II P r 0-. be r II V V II P Nr10r II P a• PP .OWaO Pa 070 00 II CO a 00 O u r N 0D N N W W 11 O O II O $0 V V a u N N . a• O O P O t0 C A O • 11 • • II • • II • • • • • • • 11 • • 11 • • • • • 11 • • • • • • • • • 2 2 V O Ho 0 lie 0 110 000000 110 0 II O 110 0 110 O 110 000000 110 0 to r NV010 11 V 0000 %4000 y H \ Chime () 11 N 00• 00N000 or .0 11 11 11 II It II ♦ O • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ` • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 9 A a a a 2 A v ✓ r r r r W W G Li 1J C A 9 CO G m CO CO 2 A N N N N N N C A O N N N N N r 2 Co ✓ Co IT as GI A ti 4 S Y S Z S a C w m m a a A a r r -e a r to o o rn a m m M C 4 r n n n ... c 0 v c c " 2 A 2 z . A A •/ V 4 S 4 4 1_ C Co C m r a !• c A r rn 2 r c 3 —I C a S r -I c n a .• • a S 0 n N a n A 0 ozm C enar a .. -4 •• n C L. O O + 2 LIT. 0 7A C K -c ID 10 A C C ID m C 0 0 O O U = C \ O -- T r r v A O •• Oise N o V o o x m \i 4 ID M O A O O V V CO 'N r r ND ID 6 C b 11 I I 1 n r r F r N c n 0 o t r m 0 T r r .• .D I . ID C P. A # O r N M 2 1 1 1 1 1 H a C6 ON c a a 0 r W W r r N to 2 V V i' t N C. C H O O W V O S C 1 '0 IS •/ a xi m A C C S r N L m ti 11 tl It 11 11 '0 C7 to 11 11 II 11 II a 11 11 II 11 11 II 0 � II ti 11 II II 11 m 1n II r 11 II 0 II 11 II NO 11 II II 11 11 •• •• 11 P II 11 11 II II ! O - II II II II II A A O II Li 11 II Y (41 II 11 r r 11 r S A 40 11 ♦ 11 r 11 ♦ r 11 ♦ a II CO O) 11 .• O A \ II I. II r N P II IO ID 11 ♦ t Il o O II O C a O II • 11 • • • 11 • • II • • II • e 11 • V II Co 11 ♦ N N 11 V 1 V 11 0 O 11 O O II O i H II r U O O O II 0 1 04 II O O II O O II O •4 0 II 11 II 1 II It 0 0 O • • • • • • 0 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 7 III \ d -t ro — 3 N v D O n b Ir I a � b b I K C tl A 7 a O "V I I K m K b r C •• -I o " 3 K N I /I I m 3 S m k n N z m. c m V S O 1 / z 1 c 1 m b .- O m tl o r r O x"11'"/ n m 1 1 O 7 p 0 K m N ro r -1 1 -M C " 1 w n ti N P n I�\ C Y 1� Y n m b S C. m ♦• ) Q I'+ I m N m p n N O N 1 4 n N S N C o m OCY etc ^y h. Ot0 1 A .. m M O 1 v p 1 1��1.. -4 r 11 � 77 `C T I ro o T n ! • K1 A A ° X N 2 ' 1O o I. m A r �>>� I m "0 0 V A a b f .N. 9 D -4 IC1/2. \(.\\I : m I D p 11 p a n O 1 O ¢ T. T 9 x O n rt: 2 m A r" O K 7C t m C C N K -1 C I� C S -1 ti .'.1 -11� c x z c i4-4 c o r K b 1 M M H 1 T 1 m K A 1 m A I 1 p 9 N 1 I Cr n K C� an O I o K A 3 3 c y ti ro 1 p n a S a r N a r m m (� o 'n O n i C 1 , t li m 5 3 m A L 3 3 T c C A r n 1,,� .. 1 m 2 n b O p m C a C C D N r W Y N N � r n "1 a r m m -I I 5 r m n N •• I Ir m -� I •0 N a n - C A A KI C p 3 h+ n I I I .. C •• N 1 m N C I 1� N I I� T N 3 C n I a rn ,1 _ C'' x N 2 O X O b ,-T, 1�\ M M II6� -y O Z 10 CI•X C it ^ N N C_ C ✓ " \ P 'i x N 1 r N azO N "I I. " O n K r m O \ N x N \ -I b 3 •i -7 O m m V T a b r m o p C C C N T a c% 4:::, h ... z -s) .b m . O -i z o r v o p r n ti q _I ° m n b o c c s0 x O N ‘0 r 4 a a 1 M n ? o Imo, 9 O K 1 b fit ro r lb CO m C !v� 2 a -1 iii N 1 I O O M� O p G: .. 1 l� C ti �! 1 C m ' 2 1 • 1 m . . N a IW I -I T 1` b_ n n 1 A \ re- O Or . w x c ti O I A C O m I� I D b 1 r l m = C 1 A O i' C 2 'o ro O 1 p O I I� m m A a 1 a . 2 N 0 -1 H Y ' � 0o s m m n o m p n a •• •• 3 p n � N N C AS 3 1 b .+ m �0 m O m 111 1 ►� = m 1 r. c m m l 3 K 1 �V Z A Co ft.. M I b IG -1 z m V X; 2 • m O 2 r. b III�� P O • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • m • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • s A A IC Y I / /, O i 12a 3 N O a O h 14. z X -40 X / 1 D S 9 9 I < C 4 1 a 3 9 q * C D MTN 1 i m K ro ! W IS 1 O M 2 •y * S A m 1 / T 3 ro m h N AI m c m ro x * co A O I.• I -�2 Y O I m A •• O h m O 2 O r r * m 9 71 9 1 m k; 1 Z O \ 3 A h i m N * A 2 • I V if ti M ItC,.J N c i \ \ 3 ►e a1 i N O K 7• �1 v s n/ m X �� r m o 1 z o m .. s 1 f�� 1� . ►. i m t� m A .40 %. 00 IF N I 1`; h 1� W I x ,, N o N RI O * r C I I A _ O k\HAF‘k p a 1 %%47 Z O * .. 1 n z m o 9 z x 11 o 2 7h • ro r A O WI 1 ro O i h C * O { . I ' I o ut v m «. ro r x m 3 * e 1 h AaxNz om A W * DI r IT m ro O � r 9 I C N a i re * bI' r t--� IS b iI .. o r z a 04 a * x m a. t1 a A A A f1 4 i O W M * -11 DA a D Oo F o h m 2 1n. a m o K o * D 2 7C r� K Fr G 6 N K -1 C -t N- W h K V 1'" m C z .. i a i X m �1 .a tl1 "i N 1". O I S y+ Z O 1 O 2 S 9 S Z * r O N O �I 1 m - -1 O m m i r D A * r o 0 o 1 i I m i K A m a A X N i A * K � m � I I 2 W x h K '11 O I 9 i 9 9 * r A D I K m o 0 3 I1p�/✓� 2 K m r z * x er A m = TI m o h 3 I m zI {� 2 m O r N » S eAN X 3 1 ro \. q C A r •+ W I! r m 2 a A * m O A T m I W I C _I b 1 2 0 9 H r I Y� {p 1\y N i r h 11 * T A m 1 m N .9 III I v m M N 04 1 1 �7 1 1+ r N D h * C A I A I K O I � I b N A 1� y -I DI M_ O H Z V * ,1 N I i A N Z 1 r 1D I1 2 * O z I MI a Y i wI I 1 m I m co S a * h A I r A I m O Z * I D I .+ C 11 i 1 G Y a * 2 I z ro o m I F. I o -+ z * � -+ r o z o I I m r a q o cW17 t+ p � x I o H o r i z a * a 11 m I M hCO C 1II a S C� * h O C> N. I • I� � O 2 1 O � O A o ►~i *• C i ro H G i lie ro I� c m m z * z x o m M K 2 on Cf * -1 m A A I •• i r X. 1 I I� a h h N A IP i * C O I� O O I I '• A h * m r I b 9 I Co IoQ COM M O C r * A ro I o I oo m z m n r9i • 3P 03 a 9 r I �( 2 N 14 * O 1 l h V m I = * m m IN m , w } z ale SI I 4.1 411.. - m m m m , 1 = 1 K 1 Z a m 1.00 * a ! � .- O m m4\ D I t i 2 m m * S D m tb �D A A Z I 1 I X CI Z •• * O A A •• • • m • * CZ 0 O a * z a r a a W * *42 0 .. •*. * al wG ♦ .O * O 0 O • • 11 • • • • • • 0 • • 41 41 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1I. A a =_ o 44 ro — 2 N to A ° n . x i K n 'O I I - \ I A 2 A A K C CI b 2 A a . C 9 m A N 1 I I M m K ro = r 2 '0 RI � et O w C/ O 01 A X . S 70 101 m 11 i'; m ° Ir^ Z 0 r Y fmf ° 44 -4 ° fe 44 N * z z T N 9 I \� r K VJ -i c -1 2 w H H N O w . ti 1 O r' S }Q. m S w m a x b m w . 1 I' w 1 .4 r m N T w co \ 00 . MI ti n $••1/4-."".. N 1 S N in; N rn O . r r m m w O i No -. M I C I '."-t-% 1 3 +. a O D 11 \ z O Its w x 2 Its} • K k ` - } � o 0 o m C M Ti o X n C * O nb� I� q m ro O 1 ro x D 1 N D K m . A } I`. r I-A ` IC ro Z 1 w O .. b .. A Ir F I T (�a O ((..�� 9 9 21 A F. K O CO T . 11 A :0 '\ b V-- A O n rn 2 m. A T O K O . D Y -+(� N.: � � d 1° T C O N K C �1 I► y N ' `\�M N O 11 2 .. 20 O 2 O 2 m S x * r N } O T } T N +1 b m K r b b . w 011 O 70 K A 1 m w ►v M 9 . -1 00 n \ "1 t m -4 77 i m a A "O N 7D �► K \N .. j S } 1 CO S n K/ T ° } b LO D D . r K 9 m 1 I K T O T\ 02 1 2 K m r 2 . 2 Nm r 11 } Y O h n^ s I:• D w \ (A ,., a 01 o r 0 IF a \A m 1 m m I�n` m 1f o n s 1, m x s m N s 7t 0c N s } s ro a C XI r .. 1 w m 2 n A Ir FT O n T O N C A x ° D N S Z N 1 N K r n n I► A F T t m 4 70 1 a m w N •• m H { o N 9 n * A C AI 70 K O I A 2 w n1 i xi w O . m 114 I } I tx CO N O � K 9 I t 02 C J . n r 1 I o 2 2 ti 1� w S N 2 r . rn 1t- D rn w w I� H OO M . n N I, N N 1\ $ r H A N 2 N 2 . S = } H X T O } I N } ° a 2 N * IA I D Z K 11 I T 1 T to 2 A a. A I ( r 1 >D 1 rn O X 1► 11 A w C '11 x 1 c 1 -. s o x 2 i } z '0O m + I P. I a •• X . n .1 444 0 z -4 e i I m a a o C I%► 3 10 w 2 n = y N rD r 2 2 CI 0 II.w n om C 'I CO C 1 K I* 2 1 i 9 LilH IF . O 7° O N 1M� v ! °e H } 1°t 1 c m m 1.0 IMF i = m ' ` • 1� m K • • 2 N in G1 . �1 rn A 14-11 (N �• _ '0 •� • �(1�`� n n K A -a * c O } 1 C r to w F n -i * A Z O 1pR C O T A . rn 2 } I I X A } m c o r . x 1 , I 9 D 1„ 1 O C . S i } p �x � m S ;3 11 Imo► .a. .21 s I +}o' o S I*. 0 n N m i A 9 . m 1 2 A m I N t C M . ro s s' f a ( w m r0 m m » .4 Co �1 3> I I z to � I K z m � * 2A9A9 mmb i m ° _ • r C A AO. 6, t . Z9 .• ♦ N I*. ~ H 0 ♦ r0 . O 0. O • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • is 41 10/90 SUMMARY OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING September 4, 1990 A regular meeting of the Weld County Planning Commission was held on september 4, 1990, in the County Commissioners' Hearing Room (Room #101) , weld County Centennial Building, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado. The meeting was called to order by the chairman, Jerry Kiefer at 1:35 p.m. Tape 378 Roll Call Rick Iverson Absent LeAnn Reid Present Ann Garrison Present Richard Kimmel Present Jean Hoffman Present Don Feldhaus Present Judy Yamaguchi Present Jerry Kiefer Present Bud Clemons Present A quorum was present. Also present: Keith Schuett, Current Planner, Brian Grubb, Current Planner, Lee Morrison, Assistant Attorney, and Bobbie Good, Secretary. The summary of the last regular meeting of the Weld County Planning Commission held on August 21, 1990, was approved as distributed except the last motion, a recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners for USR-922, William Bradley Pickert and Everdina AnnaMarie Pickert, was approved with seven voting for and one against the motion. CASE NUMBER: USR-923 APPLICANT: Mount Calvary Lutheran Church REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Roview permit for an expansion of an existing church in the R-2 (Duplex Residential) zone district LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NE} of Section 7, TIN, R66W of the 6th P.M.: Lots 2-5 and 8-11 Peaceful Acres Subdivision, Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: 657 Park Avenue, Fort Lupton: approximately 150 feet south of the City of Fort Lupton, west of Denver Avenue APPEARANCE: Charles Blanco, Pastor and Agent, represented this applicant. This request is for an addition to the church for a multi-purpose kitchen and fellowship hall. The recommendation of the Department of Planning Services' staff was reviewed. These are acceptable with the exception of Condition #6 pertaining to a performance guarantee bond. He asked for clarification. Also, the City of Fort Lupton has recommended the parking lot be paved. The Bstaff feels this would contribute to a drainage problem and they agree. Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting September 4, 1990 Page 2 Keith Schuett stated Condition M6 was worded as such in order for the applicant to decide what method they will use for the performance guarantee. The applicant may present the method of performance guarantee they will use to the Board for consideration. The Chairman called for discussion from the audience. There was none. The Chairman asked the applicant if he objected to the recommendation being filed with the summary as a permanent record rather than being read into the record. He had no objection. MOTION: Jean Hoffman moved Case Number USR-923, Mount Calvary Lutheran Church, for a Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for an expansion of an existing church in the R-2 (Duplex Residential) zone district be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with the Planning Commission's recommendation for approval based upon the recommendation, conditions, and development standards presented by the Department of Planning Services' staff and the testimony heard by the Planning Commission. Motion seconded by Judy Yamaguchi. The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Planning Commission. Discussion followed. The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Judy Yamaguchi - yes; LeAan Reid - yes; Bud Clemons - yes; Richard Kimmel - yes; Ann Garrison - yes; Jean Hoffman - yes; Don Feldhaus - yes; Jerry Kiefer - yes. Motion carried unanimously. CASE NOMBER: 2-457 APPLICANT: Donald w. and Adele A. Baldridge REQUEST: Change of Zone from PUD (Planned Unit Development) for I-1 (Industrial) and C-2 (Commercial) uses to POD (Planned Unit Development) for T-1 (Industrial) and C-3 (commercial) uses LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part Of the NE} NE} of Section B, T2N, R6BW of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: South of State Highway 119, approximately .5 miles east of Weld County Road 3-1/2 APPEARANCE: Vern Nelson, C.E., Nelson Engineers, represented the applicants. This is already a planned unit development and the applicants wish to change the zoning from Commercial-Two to Commercial-Three to provide outside storage or display uses. Summary of the weld County Planning Commission Meeting September 4, 1990 Page 3 The Chairman called for discussion from the audience. There was none. Mr. Nelson stated he would like clarification of Paragraph 3, page 1 and Item 2, page 2 regarding use of the St. Vrain Sanitation Service. The City of Longmont is expanding its service to include the property adjacent to this one. It would be more economical to install the Longmont Sewer system because there world be no roads to cross, etc. Keith Schuett stated the Weld County Comprehensive Plan designates that the Mixed-Use Development District must utilize the St. Vrain Sewer system. The applicant can present this request to the Hoard of County Commissioners, but neither the staff nor the Planning Commission can make any other recommendation. Leo Morrison explained that at the time the Comprehensive Plan was written and approved, there were no other sewer services available in this area. Now that Longmont is expanding its services, the Comprehensive Plan may need to be amended. The Chairman asked the applicant if they objected to the staff's recommendations being filed with the summary in lieu of being read into the record. He had no objections. MOTION: Bud Clemons moved Case Number Z-457, Donald W. and Adele A. Baldridge, for a Change of Zone from planned unit development for Industrial-One and Commercial-Two uses to planned unit development for Industrial-One and Commercial-Three uses be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with the Planning Commission's recommendation for approval based upon the recommendation and conditions presented by the Department of planning Services' staff and the testimony heard by the Planning Commission. Motion seconded by Jean Hoffman. The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Planning Commission. Discussion followed. The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Judy Yamaguchi - yes; LeAnn Reid - yes; Bud Clemons - yes; Richard Kimmel - yes; Ann Garrison - yes; Jean Hoffman - yes; Don Feldhaus - yes; Jerry Kiefer - yes. Motion carried unanimously. Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting September 4, 1990 Page 4 CASE NUMBER: USR-924 APPLICANT: Philip Artese REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a home business in the A (Agricultural) zone district LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NE} of Section 6, TIN, R65w of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Approximately 3 miles west of the Town of Hudson; north and adjacent to State Highway 52, and approximately .5 miles east of Weld County Road 37 APPEARANCE: Philip Artese, applicant and owner, stated they opened an art gallery about f twenty years ago in the basement of their house. They now need the basement for living area and they would like to construct a separate facility for the gallery. This would allow more security for them in the house. They do not expect a larger number of people visting them than in the past. Also, their son, who is now living with them, is a photographer, but no developing will be conducted on the property. They have an asphalt driveway, and it does accommodate all people who have come to the gallery. They will make application to the Division of Water Resources to register the well as commercial rather than domestic according to its recommendation, and they will include plans for a restroom in the new building to correspond with the Health Department's recommendation. LeAnn Reid reported she had done a field check of this property. Presently there is ample room for ingress and egress and to turn around. The property is very attractive and very well kept, and to her knowledge always has been. It is a beautiful piece of property, and there appears to be an extra wide shoulder on the road in this area that allows for easy exit from the property. The Chairman called for discussion from the audience. There was none. The Chairman asked the applicant if he objected to the staff's recommendation being filed with the summary as a permanent record. He had no objections. MOTION: LeAnn Reid moved Case Number USR-924 for Philip Artese for a Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a home business in the Agricultural zone district be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with the Planning Commission's recommendation for approval based upon the recommendation, conditions, and development standards presented by the Department of Planning Services' staff and the testimony of the applicant. Motion seconded by Judy Yamaguchi. Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting September 4, 1990 Page S The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Planning Commission. Discussion followed. The Chairmar, asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Judy Yamaguchi - yes; LeAnn Reid - yes; Bud Clemons - yes; Richard Kimmel - yes; Ann Garrison - yes; Jean Hoffman - yes; Don reldhaus - yes; Jerry Kiefer - yes. Motion carried unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 2:10 p.m. Respectfully submitted, ZeN. :_,... c:\eioa Bobbie Good Secretary C',VELD coy 1 ^ r, ^` cti `G P c. <« MINUTES \. WELD COUNTY COUNCIL C_E, August 1, 1990 70 Tapes 6&7/90 The Weld County Council met in regular session in full conformity with the Weld County Home Rule Charter at 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado, on Wednesday, August 1, 1990 at 7:30 p.m. ROLL CALL: The following members were present in person: President Norman Carlson, Vice President Doris Williams (arrived later) , Councilman Frank Stewart, Councilman Gary Lebsack, and Councilman David Young. Also present were Marion Richter, two reporters, and the Council Secretary. MINUTES: Councilman Lebsack made a motion to approve the minutes of the July 11, 1990 meeting. The motion was seconded by Councilman Stewart. President Carlson commented that the minutes were very thorough and complete, and not in condensed form, as the Commissioners' Minutes are. He stated that he prefers this more complete version. The other Council Members agreed. Vote was taken and the motion carried unanimously. APPOINTMENTS: President Carlson noted that on Monday, August 13, 1990 at 10:00 a.m. there is an Elected Officials Meeting scheduled and all Council Members are invited to attend. He commented that he tries to attend most of these meetings. Councilman Young questioned the nature of the business conducted at these meetings. President Carlson explained that each official is asked to report on what is happening in their particular area of the County government. Councilman Young asked who all attends the meetings. President Carlson replied that only County elected officials are invited to attend. ADDITIONS TO AGENDA: There were no additions to the agenda. CORRESPONDENCE: President Carlson noted the correspondence received. REPORTS_ President Carlson noted that with regard to the issue on the Planning Department which was brought up at the last meeting, he has not had an opportunity to do anything further as yet. He will contact Councilman Young when he is ready to meet with him on this issue. OLD BUSINESS: SALARIES FOR ELECTED OFFICIALS President Carlson commented that he still feels that even though the Council did raise the salaries in January, they made a mistake four years ago in not giving the elected officials a raise at that time. The State Legis- lature put Weld County in Category 1, which would have automatically given the elected officials a raise, in addition to increasing the salaries for ail Category I counties. He noted that one commissioner in Larimer County will receive an increase, while the other two must be re-elected before they receive an increase. This means one commissioner will receive $50,000, while the other two will receive $38,000. Councilman Young questioned whether this was deter- mined by State Statute. President Carlson replied that it is. He explained that Home Rule solved this problem in Weld County. The County Council sets salaries for the commissioners every two years, and for the other elected officials every four years. He questioned whether this item should be tabled, or if a motion would be made at this time. He pointed out that he would like to see the salaries increased to $40,000 for the four year period, instead of the gradual increase previously approved by the Council . J\ ` Page 2 er Weld County Council Minutes August 1, 1990 ' • Councilman Stewart noted that when this issue was previously considered, , he had suggested this same thing and did not have a second to his motion. He commented that a lot of study was done previously and he has received a great deal of input from citizens suggesting that the current schedule for increases should remain. He made a motion to let their original decision stand. Councilman Lebsack seconded this motion. Councilman Young commented that this item was tabled at the previous meeting for his benefit to allow him time to study the matter. He has looked into this matter further, and noted that when he applied for his position on the Council , he indicated that he was in favor of paying quality salaries to attract quality individuals. He was not sure how the State came up with the figures they used, but noted that in the general work place, people are com- pensated for services and raises are for improved performance. He felt that this isn't always the case in government, and that the two considerations in this case are budget limitations imposed by the Home Rule Charter and the economic conditions in the County. Voters determine performance by whether they keep someone in the job, the salary doesn't do that, and the Council is not in a position to evaluate performance and award salary based on that performance. He felt that cost of living, budgetary considerations and economic considerations in the County were the determining factors. Let the record reflect that Vice President Williams is now present. President Carlson clarified that commissioners' salaries in Category 1 counties will only be increased by about $4,000, but since some counties were reclassified from Category 2 to Category 1, salaries for commissioners in those counties are being increased from $38,000 to $50,000. He explained that the State designates which category counties will fall into based on assessed valuation and population. Councilman Stewart pointed out that this salary increase by the State makes the elected officials' positions more attractive, and more people are running for office where there had previously been little interest. Councilman Young noted that even though it has been stated that there would be no increase in taxes if the elected officials' salaries were increased, there are other considerations, such as the negative view taken by County employees because they did not receive similar increases, and the fact that this would take away from other program monies. He felt that the gradual increase already approved would not impact the budget, and he was in favor of the motion as stated. President Carlson clarified that the Assessor, Treasurer, Clerk & Recorder, and Sheriff were the positions being considered at this time. Councilman Stewart confirmed this clarification. Councilman Lebsack commented that he hopes the Council keeps this matter open ended, as he would hate to see a freeze as was done previously. He felt that other counties may be required to freeze salaries once they take this dramatic increase, and that over a period of time Weld County may match or even surpass the salaries of those other counties' elected officials, but on a more gradual schedule. President Carlson noted that the action taken now will affect these elected officials from now on, from the standpoint of their retirement incomes. Council- man Stewart pointed out that if these people stay in office for a few more years, it will make a big difference in their retirement incomes. Councilman Young commented that these elected officials are all very valuable people who have provided very valuable services to the County. President Carlson agreed and explained that this is why he felt they should be given the more immediate increase. Councilman Young pointed out that they are not setting salaries based on the individuals currently holding the offices, but based on the positions themselves. Councilman Stewart commented that he is very proud of all of the officials and they will be very difficult to replace, but the Council must look at the rest of the people in the County as well . The public comments he has received were in favor of the gradual increase already approved by the Council . President Carlson noted that with the 5% limit, salaries could be increased as much as $100,000 and there would be no tax increase. Councilman Stewart pointed out that the money would have to be shifted from somewhere. President Carlson explained that about 90% of the County budget is mandated by the State Legislature, so what is left goes into salary increases. Councilman Lebsack pointed out that there is a point of diminishing returns. President Carlson agreed that this may affect the amount available for increases for other County employees. -� Page 3 Weld County Council Minutes • August 1, 1990 Vice President Williams commented that she has already made her position known on this issue over the past several weeks, and she felt that President Carlson should call for the question. Vote was taken and the motion carried on a four to one vote, with President Carlson opposing. President Carlson commented that he could have voted either way, and he had no problem with the motion. He felt that these are four very good elected officials who deserve the same consideration that is given in other counties. NEW BUSINESS: PAYMENT OF BILLS President Carlson explained that it is really not necessary for the Council to approve the expenses of each of the Council Members. This is a tradition that has been carried on, but is not required. Vice President Williams explained that this was done in the past to give other Council Members an idea of what each of them was doing, and also to let the Commissioners know that the Council had approved those expenses. She pointed out that she was adding telephone charges totalling $8.31 to her expenses for the month of July to be included with her mileage. Councilman Stewart stated that he liked having the Payment of Bills on the agenda. Councilman Young noted that the Council does have a budget for these expenses. Vice President Williams commented that having this item on the agenda allows the Council Members .to see what expenses are being paid from the budget. Councilman Stewart made a motion to approve the payment of the bills. Councilman Lebsack seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. EMPLOYEE OPINION SURVEY Vice President Williams explained that at the last meeting she was asked to review the employee opinion survey and report back to the Council . She has looked through the survey and was not sure that it would have any impact on the employees. She felt that the questions were too generic and open-ended. Councilman Young questioned the purpose of this survey. Vice President Williams explained that with an employer the size of Weld County, there are always problems among the employees. However, she did not see this survey as serving any useful purpose in this regard. Councilman Young questioned whether this was being viewed as a tool to be used in performance audits. President Carlson explained that this was not the purpose. This question goes back to about six months ago when Councilman Stewart proposed that the County have a company come in to do some training. Councilman Stewart explained that the County is a member of the Rocky Mountain Employers Association and it has been brought to their attention that they have people who can do all the training and guidance that is needed. He noted that he had recommended a company he felt the Commissioners should listen to, at no cost to them, to see if steps couldn't be made in improving relation- ships between employees and their supervisors. Councilman Young asked the name of this company. Councilman Stewart explained that this is a company in Denver and related some successful experiences that company has had with other employers in Colorado. He felt the Commissioners should hear the presentation of this company. The name of the company is Management Associates, and they have done work all over the Country and overseas. He commented that he would personally pay for the program if the County could pay him half of the gain they would see from implementation of the program over a ten year period. He noted that the cost would be less than that of the last election, and would have a much greater benefit to the County. Vice President Williams asked that the other Council Members review the survey and provide their input. Councilman Lebsack asked where they should proceed from here, if this survey is unacceptable. Vice President Williams replied that she felt they should consider a program such as the one suggested by Councilman Stewart. Councilman Young pointed out that the real issue is what is done with the information gleaned from the survey, not the survey itself. Councilman Lebsack questioned the cost associated with the employee opinion survey Vice President Williams had reviewed. President Carlson replied that he had not seen a cost for this, but that they could ask a representative of the Personnel Department to meet with them to explain the survey further. Councilman Stewart did not feel this was worth their time. Councilman Young noted that the cost of this survey would be $750 plus $5.50 per participant. Vice President Williams pointed out that if this wasn't an effective tool , it would be a waste of time and money. Councilman Young asked if money had been set aside for this. President Carlson felt that it had not. Page 4 Weld County Council Minutes August 1, 1990 Councilman Young agreed to review the survey and deliver it to the Council Office for the other Council Members to pick up and review. Councilman Young questioned whether this item had come up as a result of the union issue. President Carlson replied that the County has had ongoing training for many years for their employees, and this was not directly related to the union issue. He commented that there is no way to know how effective the current training program is without talking to some of the employees. Councilman Lebsack noted that this is basically an employee attitude survey. Councilman Stewart commented that they had already heard from some of the County employees who were not happy. Councilman Young asked if something similar to this could be done on a County-wide basis in place of an audit. Vice President Williams explained that this was not being considered in the context of an audit. It is only being reviewed for the Personnel Department as a method they could use, or as an ongoing tool to allow employees to express their attitude toward the County. She did not feel this particular survey was a tool they were looking for. These were not the questions they should be asking. She felt that a very small number of employees were actually having problems, but one link in the chain effects the performance of the entire system. Councilman Stewart related an example of communication problems between a supervisor and his employees and how this problem was turned around. He felt that working together as a team was contagious. Councilman Young questioned the current training program. President Carlson replied that he was not sure. This was a question which should be directed to the Personnel Department. President Carlson pointed out that government is not run on a profit basis, so they cannot offer money incentives in the way private enterprise can. He noted that no action need be taken on this item at this time. Vice President Williams stated that she felt they should make a recommendation to the Personnel Department on this survey after all the Council Members had a chance to review it. Vice President Williams pointed out that the County Council Members were omitted as elected officials on the list of officials published in the New News, which is the official paper for Weld County legal notices. However, notices have been published advising people to pick up petitions for the General Election. She questioned what would happen if five or six people circulated petitions for one position on the Council and got on the ballot, and if the person with the most votes wins. President Carlson explained that the list she was referring to was for the Primary Election only, and the Council can not be included in the Primary. If the same thing happens with the list for the General Election, they will look into •it. He noted that the person receiving the most votes does win the election. Councilman Young felt that the Home Rule Charter should determine this. President Carlson explained that this was according to State Statute. Councilman Young pointed out that runoff elections were held in the City's Mayoral race. He noted that Article XV of the Home Rule Charter states: " —nominated and elected persuant to State Law. . .". President Carlson explained that since the State Statutes do not refer to the County Council , Home Rule Charter must regulate this. PUBLIC COMMENTS: There were no public comments. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. The time of adjournment was 8:25 p.m. on August 1, 1990. ec L.,, Norman Carlson, President Date Approved Kay Hansberry�y, BOARD OF THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY COLORADO ` PO BOX 758 GREELEY, CO 80632 August 31st, 1990 Gentlemen: On August 31st, 1990 I appeared at the office of the Weld County Commissioners in order to inspect the documents I had requested for my hearing in my letter to you dated August 23rd, 1990. I was disappointed not to find most o£ the documents I was looking for in spite of a diligent effort by the two ladies in your office. Due to this fact I requested a continuance of my hearing for the 12th of September, 1990 and Mr.Bruce Barker assured me that there would be no problem for such a continuance. Again I would like to request or subpoena the originals of the following documents to be available for my inspection a reasonable amount of time prior to the hearing as well as their presence at the time of the hearing: 1 . The 1961 petition to establish the Johnstown Pest Control District along with all signatories. 2. The ballots voting for or against the establishment of the Johnstown Pest Control District. 3. The verification of such a petition and that 66 2/3% of affected Land Owners voted for the establishment of the District. 4. Most recent Competitive bids from all contractors. 5. The last annual report by the pest control inspector to the board . 6. The inspectors official notice served on me as land owner. hank you, i�F/31c le "liP36 680 WCR 3 kOiCie Berthoud, CO 0513 - _ " - l - • `o STATE F A •nf � J� � COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICESCL—j— •r,; ' 1575 Sherman Street N4 y Denver,COlorade 80207.1711 1 arY 8 Phone(303)866-5700 MEMORANDUM ••,e-n r Roy Romer Covemor 70: Board of County Commissioners Rene M.Executivet orector FRt ^?: Karen Beye, Deputy Director ak�,�e i Colorado Department of Social Services " -. Ak4ust 31 , 1390 SUBJECT: Foster Care Review System in the fall of 1989, the State Board cf Social Services directed the State Department of Social Services t0 develop are alternative t0 the foster care allocation formula. No agreement could be developed among county departments o* social services on whether to continue to use the current formula or to use a new formula recommended by the Child Welfare Study. The recent passage of S8 96 has removed the allocation methodology from State statutes and requires that the State Department of Social Services' budget request be based upon the actual aggregate expenditure of all counties during the preceding 24 months of foster care. In response to the directive of the State Board and the rewuirements of $6 96, the Stag Department of Social Services formed a task force of State and county staff which is currently developing the Colorado Foster Care Review System as an alternative to the use of an allocation formula. The review system is scheduled to be piloted in seven (7) counties -- Arapahoe. Boulder, Cha°fee , Douglas , Montrose, Pueblo, and Routt. Tne pilot will start October 1 , 1990, and run through June 30. 1991 . The State Department has submitted a budget initiative to the Joint Budget Committee requesting approval to implement the Foster Care Review System statewide beginning July 1 , 1991 . We have attached the Summary of the Proposed Colorado Foster Care Review System to provide you an overview of the program. A presentation of the Foster Care Review System is scheduled for the Health and Human Services Committee Meeting of CCI on September 6, 1990. If you have any questions. please contact your County Director or the Field Administrator for your county department of social services. You may also wish to contact me at (303) 866-5500. Attachment Cc : County Department of Social Services Directors Field Administrators - ec;,,o ,A0 w SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSED COLORADO FOSTER CARE REVIEW SYSTEM This is an overview of the proposed Foster Care Review System which was designed by a task force consisting of staff from the state and county departments of social services. What is the Proposed Colorado Foster Care Review System? The proposed Colorado Foster Care Review System is a program which will conduct regular on-site assessments of all children in foster care placement and those children receiving services as alternatives to placement This will assure that these children have met the requirements o£the Colorado Out-of-Home Placement Criteria, appropriate state and federal regulations, and that the county department is eligible for state reimbursement for the cost of placement. Why have a review system? The proposed Review System will: o Assure compliance with federal and state statutes and regulations, avoid federal financial sanctions, and capture available federal funds. G Assure that the distribution of foster care funds to counties is based on the number of children in need of placement and not an allocation formula which can no longer be used due to the recent passage of SB 96 by the Colorado State Legislature. O Assure statewide consistency in applying the Colorado Ourof-Home Placement Criteria. o Assist in identifying needed resources and allow county to county sharing of successful placement and alternative programs. G Allow the state to develop accurate, and timely information on children in placement This information will increase predictability in program and fiscal planning. 0 Assure that children are in out-of-home placement no longer than necessary. Who Will Operate the Review System? The Colorado Department of Social Services will operate this statewide program with qualified staff to conduct on-site placement reviews in the county department having legal custody of the child. Program staff and operating costs will be funded by federal monies available under Title IV-E of the Social Security Act When Will the Placement Reviews be Conducted? Reviews will be conducted on children in foster care and in alternative programs who have been in placement for 31 days or more and every 6 months thereafter in accordance with Public Law 96-272. Whe a Will Reviews be Conducted? Reviews will be conducted in local county departments of social services withsounty staff, the child, and parents in attendance. Counties will have the opportunity to appeal reviewer decisions. Flow Will the System be Implemented? The Colorado Foster Care Review System, designed by a task force of state and county staff, will be piloted in Arapahoe, Boulder, Chaffee, Douglas, Montrose, Pueblo and Routt Counties from October 1990 through June 1991. The results of the pilot will be used to develop the final system. The state department is submitting a budget initiative to authorize funds for the program If the initiative is successful, the program will be implemented state wide beginning July 1991. st 22. 1900 / Notices 34981 Blweeldy Notice APO:900m and Amcnttn ants to Operating UJoareaes Involving Ho Sign,Sai!Hazards Consideration L Background Pursuant to Public Law(PI.)97415. + the Nuclear Regulatory Commission(the Commission)is publishing this regular biweekly notice.P.L 97415 revised section 180 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1984,as amended(the AO.to.retiufre the Commission to publish notice of say amendments issued.or proposed to be issued,under a new provision of section Ha of the Act This provision grants the Commission the authority to issue and make immediately effective any amendment to an operating license a a determination by the Commission that such amendment involves no significant hazards consideration,notwithstanding the pendency before the Commission of a request for a hearing from any person. This biweekly notice includes all notices of amendments issued,or proposed to be issued from July 30,1980 through August 10,1990:The last biweeklyaotia was published on August 8,TWO(55 FR 32322): NOTICE OF CONSIDERATION OF ISSUANCE OF AMENDMENT TO F ann OPERATING LICENSE AND PROPOSED NO SIGNIFICANT HAZARDS CONSIDERATION DETERMINATION AND OPPORTUNITY FOR HEARING The Commission has made•proposed determination that tba following amendment requests involve no significant bawds consideration.Under the Commission's regulations in 10 CFR 50.92,this means that operation of the facility in accordance with the proposed amendments would not(1)involve a sigtificsnt increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated:or(2)create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated:or(3) involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety.The basis for this s proposed determination for each amendment request is shown below. The Commission is seeking public comments on&fa proposed -determination.Any comments received t within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice will be considered in making any final determination.The Commission will not normally make a final determination e: unless it receives a request for■ bearing Written comments mqy be submitted by mail to the Regudatory Publications . V Branch.Division of Freedom of • 34362 Federal Register / VoL 55, No. 163 / Wednesday, August 22. 1980 / Notices Information and Publications Services. which petitioner wishes to Intervene. If the final determination is that the Office of Administration US.Nuclear Any person who has filed a petition for amendment involves a significant Regulatory Commission.Washington. leave to intervene or who has been hazards consideration,any hearing held DC 20555,and should cite the admitted as a party may amend the would take place before the issuance of publication date and page number of petition without requesting leave of the any amendment this Federal Register notice.Written Board up to fifteen(15)days prior to the Normally,the Commission will not comments may also be delivered to first'rehearing conference scheduled in issue the amendment until the Room P-223,Phillips Building.7920 the proceeding,but such an amended expiration of the 30-day notice period Norfolk Avenue,Bethesda,Maryland petition must satisfy the specificity However,should circumstances change from 7:30 a.m.to 4:15 p.m.Copies of requirements described above. during the notice period such that failure written comments received may be Not later than fifteen(15)days prior to to act in a timely way would result.for examined at the NRC Public Document the last preheating conference example.in deratiag or shutdown of the ' Room.the Gelman Building.2120 L scheduled in the proceeding,a petitioner facility.the Commission may issue the Street,NW.Washington,Dc The filing shall fife a supplement to the petition to license amendment before the of requests for hearing and petitions for intervene which must include a list of expiration of the 30-day notice period. leave to intervene is discussed below, the contentions which are sought to be provided that its final determination is By Septeremr 21.1390,the licensee litigated in the matter.Each contention that the amendment involves no may file a request for a hearing with must consist of a specific statement of significant hazards consideration.The respect to issuance of the amendment to the issue of law or fact to be raised or final determination will consider all the subject facility operating license and controverted.In addition.the petitioner public and State comments received any person whose interest may be shall rovide a brief explanation of the before action is taken.Should the affected by this proceeding and who bases of the contention and a concise Commission take this action,it will wishes to participate as a party in the statement of.he alleged facts or expert publish a notice of issuance:.at,provide proceeding must file a written petition opinion which support the contention for opportunity for a hearing after for leave to intervene.Requests for a and on which the petitioner intends to issuance.The Commission expects that bearing and petitions for leave to rely in proving the contention at the the need to take this action will occur intervene shall be filed in accordance hearing.The petitioner must also very infrequently. with the Commission's"Rules of provide references to those specific A request for a hearing or a petition practice for Domestic licensing sources and documents of which the for leave to intervene must be filed with Proceedings"in 10 CFR Part 2 petitioner is aware and on which the the Secretary of the Commission.U.S. Interested persons should consult a petitioner intends to rely to establish Nuclear Regulatory Commission. current copy• available of the of 0 CFR 2.7ssion's 14 which hi those facts or expert opinion.Petitioner Washington DC 20555.Attention: Document Room.theCohnen Building, must provide sufficient information to Docketing and Services Branch.or may Imo• show that a genuine dispute exists with be delivered to the Commission's Public 2120 L Street N.W.,Washington,DC the applicant on a material issue of law Document Room the Gelman Building. 20555 and at the focal Public Document Room for rhe particular facility involved. or fact.Contentions shall be limited to by t L above N.W..Washington.D.C. if a request for a hearing or petition for marten within the scope of the by the above date.Wham petitions are leave to intervene is filed by the above amendments under consideration.The filed during the last ten(10)days of the date,the Commission le an Atomic contention must be one which,if proven, notice period,it is requested that the Safety and Licensing soared.designated would entitle the petitioner to retie£A petitioner promptly so inform the by the andLieCommissionor by the Chairman petitioner who fails to file such a Commission by a toll.free telephone call of the Atomic Safety and Licensing supplement which satisfies these to Western Union at 1-(800)3258000(in requirements with respect to at least one Mi�p:i 1 800 342.6700 Board Panel,will rule on the request , -( ) ).The Western and/or petition and the Secretary or the contention as not be permitted to Daion operator should be given designated Atomic Safety and Licensing participate as a party. Dategram Identification Number 3737 Board will Won a notice of hearing or Those permitted to intervene become and the following message addressed to an appropriate order. parties to the proceeding,subject to any (Project Director):petitioner's name and As required by:0 CFR 2714,a limitations in the order granting leave to telephone number,date petition was i petition for leave to intervene shall set intervene,and have the opportunity to mailed:plant name:and publication forth with particularity the interest of participate fully in the conduct of the date and page number of this Federal the petitioner to the proceeding,and hearing,including the opportunity to Register notice.A copy of the petition how that interest may be affected by the present evidence and cross-examine should also be sent to the Office of the results of the proceeding.The petition wi.nessa• General Counsel.U.S Nuclear • should specifically explain the reasons If a hearing is requested.the Regulatory Commission,Washington why intervention should be permitted Commission will make a final DC 20555.and to the attorney for the with particular reference to the determination on the issue of no licensee. following factors:(I)the nature of the significant hazards consideration.The Nontimely filings of petitions for leave • petitioner's right under the Act to be final determination will serve to decide to intervene,amended petitions. made a party to the proceeding:(2)the when the hearing is held. supplemental petitions and/or requests nature and extent of the petitioner's If the final determination is that the for hearing will not be entertained property,financial or other interest in amendment request involve►no absent a determination by the the proceeding and(3)the possible significant hazards consideration.Oro Commission.the presiding officer or the effect of any order which may be Commission may issue the amendment presiding Atomic Safety and Licensing entered in the proceeding on the and make it immediately effective, Board.that the petition and/or request petitioners interest.The petition should notwithstanding the request for a should be granted based upon e also identify the specific aspect(s)of the hearing.Any hearing held would take balancing of factors specified in 10 CFR subject matter of the proceeding as to place after issuance of the amendment. 2714(sxl)(i)-(v)and 2.714(d). Federal Register / VoL SS. Na 193 / Wednesday, August 22. 1990 / NotiCes 31363 For further details with respect to this Farley Nuclear Plant have been*valuated to discussed in WCAP•119e3 shows that the action,see the application for determine potential impact of the proposed safety analysis assumption remains amendment which is available for public change to the ROI.MTC limit.This*valuation conservatiw with mpact to the proposed . demonstrates that the existing safety LCO limit value of 41 pond'F.NI accidents inspection at the Commission's Publicinputmetersareresent no Document Roots.the Gelman Building. envelop proposed change conservatively o the EOL new accidents have beenseated Therefore. 2120 L Street N.W.,Washington.D.C.. gem limit and that the change to both the the proposed change in the LCO technical . and at the local public document room ROL MTC WO and the surveillance specification limit from 40 to 43 parer F for the particular facility Involved. requirement are acceptable without any does not invalidate the conclusions of the Alabama Prewar Company.Docket Non changes to the existing safety analyses FEAR safety analyses and ample margin still seaumptara exists between the actual operating MTC • 50.396 and 50+1841.Joseph M.Farley The effect on the Non-L0CA.transients due values and those used in the safety analysis Nuclear Plant,Units 1 and 2.Houston to a change to the WIC was evaluated both of record County.Alabama for normal operation and transient conditions Then is no basis in the safety analyses for Dora of amendments request.July 13. end ever,the most adverse conditions will the surveillance requirement limit value.This not result in a reactivity insertion which limit merely provides early indication that the 1900 would invalidate the conclusions presented LCO in being approached.Implementation of Description of amendments request: Laths FSAR analysis.in addition.this change the new surveillance requirement value will The proposed Technical Specification was found to show no effect to the large continuo to provide adequate notice prior to changes will revise the limit for the end- Break LOCA.the Small Beak LOCA.and the reaching the LCO. of-life(iiOL)moderator temperature Steam Generator Tube Rupture(SCTR) The suspension of the surveillance coefficient(MTCI.Specifically,the analyses• requirement below 100 ppm provides proposed changes will: Therefore.the proposed license additional operational flexibility while -Change the most negative hf1'C limit amendment does not involve a significant assuring compliance with the Technical from-3.9 a he delta k/k/'P to-4.3 X 10 increase in the probability or consequences Specifications since exclusion would only be "'delta 9 X 1. F delta kkal Specification of an accident previously evaluated. permitted it the first HFP MTC measurement 2.The proposed change will not create the taken after reaching the 100 ppm hot full 3.1.1.3.b). possibility of■new or different kind of power equilibrium boron concentration is -Change the MK surveillance accident from any accident previously less negative than 40 pcM/'F.Satisfaction of requirement from-3.0 X 10'•delta k/k/' evaluated because implementation of%le tMs caveat ensures that the remainder of any F to-3.83 X10'•delta k/k/'F(Technical Change will not alter plant configuration or given cycle will be operated within the LCO Specification 4.1.1.3.b). mode of operation.Implementation of the value. -Add s footnote to the MTC proposed license amendment will provide Finally,prior to each reload all applicable surveillance requirement which provides continued assurance that analysis safety limits ate reviewed and any impact to for suspension of MTC surveillance assumptions conservatively envelop the operating plant margin noted. when the measured Nf'fC at an operational pararmeten. Therefore,this change don not involve a . M identified previously.the chasms to the significant reduction to the margin of safety, equilibrium boron concentration of less EOL MTC would be bounded by the present The licensee has concluded that the than or equal to 100 ppm to less negative FSAR■ccident analysis.(Both normal and proposed amendments meet the three than 4.0 X 10'•delta k/k/'F(Technical transient conditions were evaluated and the standards in 10 CFR 50.92 and. Specification 4.1.1.3.b). results were shown to be bounded by the therefore,involve no significant hazards -Revise associated Bases Section 3/ current FSAR accident analyses).The con consideration 4.1.1.3 to account for these changes. design and emergency operating procedures ,Boeia for proposed no significant will mute that subalticality is maintained The NRC staff has made a preliminary hazard*orproposed consideration determination: for the conditions encountered during the review of the licensee's no significant hazards Commission has provided recovery await an accident would occur. hazards consideration determination pro Tha current safety analysts remains and agrees with the licensee's analysis. standards for determining whether a no bounding and valid for the new conditions. Accordingly,the Commission proposes significant hazards consideration exists No new aaddents have been established with to determine that the requested tae stated in 10 CFR 50.92(c).A proposed the modifications of rite MTC value and the amendments do not involve a significant amendment to an operating license present accidents analysed can not degrade hazards consideration. involves no significant hazards to a new failure mode.Sufficient Margin iii Local Document Room conalderatlon if operation of the facility Bull present between fie current safety in accordance with the proposed analysis limits for MTC and the actual location:Houston-lave Memorial amendment would not:proposed a operational limits proposed with this Library,212 W.Burdeehaw Stmt P.O. significant increase o the probability or Technical Speculation change,la addition. Box ism,Dothan.Alabama 38302 ! P ty surveillance limits will be maintained and Attorney for licensee:Finest L Blake. consequences of an accident previously only suspended ii the First measured mfrP Esq.Shaw,Pittman,Potts and • evaluated;or(2)create the possibility of Ii.fTC measurement taken after reaching 100 Trowbridge.2300 N Street NW.. a new or different kind of accident from ppm HFP equilibrium boron concentration is Washington.DC 20037 any accident previously evaluated:or(3) lees negative than i0 Pm'IF■a this will NRCPro/ect Director.Elinor C. Involve a significant reduction in a provide assurance that the ultimate EOL(0 Adensam • margin of safety. ppm)HFP ARO MTC value will not violate Alabama Power Company(the the LCO Fimtt■. Alabama Power Company.Docket No. licensee)has reviewed the proposed Therefore,this change to the Technical 50.184,Joseph M.Farley Nuclear Plant Specifications dries not create the possibility changes and has determined that the of a new or different kind of accdent tram Unit 2.Houston County.Alabama requested amendments do not involve a any accident previously evaluated. Dote of amendment request:July 31, significant hazards consideration for the 3•The proposed license amendment does 1490 following masons; not involve a elgniflant Mutual to a Description of amendment request: 1.Operation of Farley Nuclear Plant Units margin of safety because an evaluation of the The proposed amendment involves an 1 and 2 in accordance with the proposed safety analyses demonstrates that the increase lit equivalent steam generator license amendment does not involve a proposed change will maintain adequate b 1 limits from the currant significant increase in the probability or margin to the Current safety relying while while P fin$ consequences of an accident previously achieving improved operability for Farley licensed value of 1011 uniform plugging evaluated The existing safety analyses for Nuclear Plant Unita 1 and 2 The evaluation t0 a new licensed value of in average 34384 Federal Register / Vol. 55, No. 163 / Wednesday. August 22. 1990 / NotiCea with a 20%peak In arty one steam switchover to raven(boron precipitaaoa Local Publio0bcument Room generator.Also included is a decreaae of were Psdoroled and all anent madusioas location;Houston-Love Memorial approximately 1.5%in reactor coolant for the).1.4.Farley Until remain valid Library_=W.Bmrtdeshaw Street P.O. system(RCS)total flowrate from the Evaluations otMSLB(Maim Steam Line BOX 1360.Dothan.Alabama 36302 current licensed value of 205,500 ppm to Break)and LOCH missend energy releaserAt!O O licensee:Ernest L Blake. a new licensed value of mew m,As concluded the precept esw and energy Es Shan°Prittman.Pot,mad DP reieasesenappliabteu+dffiewnteWnent 0- stated in the amendment request the responses remain valid and all licensing Trowbridge,2300•N Street,NW., licensee has completed a comprehensive conclusions remain valid. Washington.DC=a evaluation of the effects of the increased (21 Neither the increased tube plugging nor NEC Project Director.Elinor G. tube plugging and reduced RCS flowrate the reduction in RCS total flowrate creates Adensata and has not identified any adverse the possibility of a newoe different kind of • safety implications. accident from any sodden*previously Baltimore Gas and hlechk Company. Bans far proposed no significant evaluated.These effects were reviewed in locket Nos.50-017 and 50310.Calvert hazards arproconsid proposed n determination; detail in WCAP-12550 for any adverse attests Cliff.Nuclear Power Plant Unit Nadi on RCS components.Malor Nuclear Steam and 2,Calvert Coup Ma land T110 COmrititial0n has provided Supply System components(i.e.The reactor County, ry standards for determining whether a no veeeeL internale loop piping.reactor coolant Dote of amendment request July 10. significant hazards consideration exists pump.Pressurizer,and the CRDM(al[Control 1987,as supplemented on August 31, as stated in 10 CFR 50.92(c).A proposed Rod Drive Mechanisms))were reviewed and 1989,and August 3,1990. amendment to an operating license no adverse safety effects were found.No new Description amendment request: involves no significant hazards single failures were found No new accident Sfu The initial request as supplemented. consideration if operation of the facility initiators were found.Since increased tube in accordance with the proposed plugging can physically alter the steam proposed adding Technical Specification amendment would not:(1)involve a generator.the possible effects on the steam (TS)Operability and reporting generator were evaluated in detail.The requirements for the reactor vessel level significant increase in the probability or results of thermal and hydraulic evaluation. monitoring system(RVLMS)to the consequences of an accident previously 11-bend tube vibration assessment and the Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant evaluated;or(2)create the possibility of structural evaluation have concluded that the Units 1 and 2,TS 3/4.3.3.8,"Post a new or different kind of accident from current components of the 6 M Farley Unit 2 Accident Instrumentation."including TS any accident previously evaluated:Or(3) steam generate?'atidy the orecirements of 'fables 3.3-10 and 4.3-10,and TS 0.9.2. involve a significant ificant reduction in a the ASMEBaPV[American Society of Mechanical Etumwets Boiler and Pressure "Special Reports:"to inCOrporate margin of safety. Vessel Code].Section!II for the Increased surveillance,operability,and reporting Alabama Power Company(the tube plugging and reduced RCS aowrate. requirements for RVLNLS.In addition. licensee)has reviewed the proposed 131 No significant reduction in a margin of the applicable Rases secttons of the TS changes and has determined that the ' safety is involved with the increased tube are updated to reflect the proposed requested amendment does not involve Plugging-and reduced RCS flowrate sines all changes.The July 10,2987 request was a significant hazards consideration for current acceptance criteria continue to be initially noticed on May 18,I988(53 FR the following reasons: r met evaluation of the e 17777).Subsequently,WAR responded (1]Neither the increased tube pugging nor u effect of these to the NRC staffs request for additional the reduced RCS flowrate involve a variables on noreLOCA and LOCA transients significant increase in the probability or has verified that plant operation will be information dated August 3,1990.in consequences of any accident previously maintained within the bounds of safe, relation to inoperable RVI MS channels evaluated The LOCA(Lou-OtCoolant analyzed Conditions aa defused in the FSAR and calibration requirements.The Accidents)and nood.00A accidents were (Final Safety Analyde Report)with the August 3,1990.BGBE letter modified the reviewed in WCAP-12059 verifying that the revised technical specifiationa and the request by changing TS Table 3.3.10 to effects of increased tube plugging and conclusions presented in the FSAR remain require that the system be restored to reduced RCS flowrata do not invalidate the valid.Safe operation with revised con limits, operable status at the next refueling current analyses of record and that all design a revised K7 of Ina and as approximate 1.5% inatesd of the initial nest which • basis conclusions are still met.Several non- reduction in thermal design Cow has bun request LOCH accidents(main feedwater pipe demonstrated.The impact on Ka was small required(mixes single(bonnet be n.pture.uncontrolled bank withdrawal from and no change,K4 was required since restored to operable status at the next subcntical partial loss of flow.Waste reactor adequate margin edits in the Technical refueling. coolant pump locked rotor.steam generator Specification value.In addition.component Basis for proposed no slgmficont tube rupture(doses))were reanalyzed using evaluations have been performed to hazards consideration determination: the revised conditions associated with demonstrate compliance to current The Commission has provided increased tube plugging and reduced RCS acceptance criteria. standards for determining whether a !berate,end acceptable results were Mind Ka are Constant&kW nominal significant hazards consideration exists obtained.For those non-LOCA accidents for unpenalized setpolnt values used in as stated in 10 CPR 50.9L A • which evaluations were performed, overtemperature and overpower delta proposed acceptable results were obtained by use of protection► amendment to an operating license for a existing sensitivity studies.existing margins, The licensee has concluded that the facility involves no significant hazards or nlloation of generic DNB[departure from proposed amendment meets the three consideration if operation of the facility • nucleate boiling]margin.In all cases,current standards In 10 CFR 50.92 and in accordance with a proposed licensing criteria of record is met.In addition, therefore,involves no significant amendment would not(I)Involve a effects of asymmetrical flow distributions hazards consideration. significant increase in the probability or have been evaluated and found acceptable. The NRC staff bas made a preliminary consequences of an accident previously The most limiting Large Break LOCA analysis review of the licensee's no significant evaluated;or(2)Create the possibility of (Cs=Oa)was reanalyzed for the new hazards consideration determination a new or different kind of accident from configuration.and the analysis demonstrated end agrees with the licensee's sin. an eeddaat y a calculated PCT(Peak Claddin3 Rrea analysis. any previously evaluated;or 3) Temperatme)less than the Appendix K limit Accordingly,the Commisdon proposes Involve a significant reduction in a of 2200'P.&ideation.of Small Break LOCA. to determine that the requested margin of safety. LOCA hydraulic larder functions.Post- amendment does not involve a The licensee addressed the above LOCH long•tarm core cooling,and hot leg significant hazards consideration. three standards in the amendment a Federal Register / Vol. 55, No. 163 / Wednesday, August 22. 1980 / Notices 34365 application.In regard to the throe Trowbridge.2303 N Street.N.W.. significant hazards consideration for the standards,the licensee provided the Washington.DC 20037. following reasons: following analysis. NRC Project Director.Robert A- Proposed Change Number i (1)Operation of the facility in accordance Capra Delete Surveillance Requirement 4A.Sa.1 with the proposed amendment would not Carolina Power✓k Light CompaaY•at al. and d renumber existing Surveillance Involve a significant increase in the Requirement 40.5.43 ea Surveillance probability or consequences of an accident Docket Nall•50325 And 50.320. Requitement 40.5a. • previously evaluated. Brunswick Steam Electric Plant.Units 1 Basis The proposed amendment provides'fS and 2.Brunswick County.North The change does not involve•significant operability and reporting requirements for the Carolina hazards consideration for the following RVLMS which has been installed to enhance Date of omendmenrs request:July 20, reasons: . the ability of the plant operator to identify1.Deletion of inserviee tasting situations which could lead to Inadequate 1940 requirements applicable 10 the facility daring core cooling and take appropriate actions to Description of amendments request the bats pew from Mama of the Facility recover.The R VLMS Instrumenuitions are The proposed amendments would revise oparstuig Line to the start of Utility not required for all previously evaluated the Brunswick Steam Electric Plant commercial operation has no impact for accidents,are not required for safe shutdown Units 1 and 2(BSE3)).Technical either BSEP unit Both units have been in and are only used to provide information of Specifications(TS)to:(I)delete commercial operation for several years. the potential far inadequate core cooling. Surveillance Requirement(SR)4.0.5a.1 Accident scenarios are not affected because Thus,the proposed amendment would not and renumber remaining Sri 4.0.5.12 as inaervite tasting is no longer performed under involve a significant increase in the SR 4.0.5.a:(2)delete existing SR 4.0.8 the conditions described in Surveillance probability or consequences of an accident (Requirement)4.03..1:testing is now previously evaluated. and add a new SR 4.0.5.1:and(3) y increase the reactor coolant system performed wider the conditions described in (i)Use of the modified specification wouldSurveillance Requirement 4.03.aZ Thera is not create the possibility of a new or different (RCS)leakage monitoring frequency in no change in the probability or the kind of accident from any accident previously SR 4.4.3.2a from every 24 hours to every consequences of accidents previously evaluated. 8 hours.Change(I)deletes en obsolete "wend. Failure of this equipment would not result SR related to the Mamie@ inspection of 2 New or different accident scenarios are in any unanalyzed accident The equipment is components.The obsolete SR had been not created bydeleting the inserrice simply passive monitoring instrumentation. structured into two operational time inspection requirements of Surveillance Although the RVLMS hag beet utinsad in the segments.The first segment.now Requirement 40.5..1.These requirements Emergency Procedures for corroboration of obsolete.was to be m effect from applied only to the time period from issuance selected Indications.no Change to normal operating licensing issuance t0 of the Facility Operating License o the start operating procedures Is Involved.The. commercial operation and the second of facility commercial operation.Therefore. R VLMS is intended solely o enhance the deletion of Surveillance RegWrstaelt 403.61 ability of the operator to manage accidents segment was to be In effect from will have no impact on facility operation. and transients by providing the operator with commercial operation.Change(2) 3.The facility Is beyond the time frame additional corroborative information.Also. modifies the SR to conform to the encompeased by Surveillance Requirement no new hardware is being added to the plant Nuclear Regulatory Commission(NRC) 40Sa.1 and has been following eziatlaa as a result of this proposed change.no position related to the fnservice Surveillance Requirement 4. .8.4.2 since the existing equipment is being modified•nor are inspection program to detect start of commercial operation.Deletion of any significantly different types of operations intergranulsr stress corrosion cracking Surveillance Requirement 4.0.5x.1 will have bring introduced.Thus,the proposed new (ICSCC)in stainless steel.as covered by no impede ou the&dLry:therefore.ne helmet amendment would not create the possibility NRC Generic Letter(GL)8&01,dated oil the magla of safety for the facility exists. of a new or different kind of accident from Proposed Change Number any accident previously evaluated January 25.198°Change(3)increases Add new Surveillance Raquireme11t 40.61 t31 UM 01 the 0 0 a significant modified epecificetion would the RCS leakage monitoring ftrainency and delete existfag S.weNance Regoirement na reduction io a to allow earlier detection of leakage to 40ty. reduce the potential consequences .0. main of Thee proposed amendment provides related to ICSCC.as coveted in NRC GL Basta The to reflect h recommendations era being assurance of the availability of en add/Lionel 88-0'1. revised to repeat the raeontvrend4tionl In means for monitoring the proper functioning Basis for proposed no significant Generic Latter 5601(GLe60t),which of the engineered safety features system In hazards consideration determination: identifies the latest NRC position regarding maintaining the core cooling&archon. The Coaumissfon has provided the inspection of avateaitlo stainless steal Redundant channels of environmentally standards for determining whether a no (BWR)Profs*The recce msendetlone qualified instrumentetfon ale provided to significant he`a` s consideration exi sts provided in the Generic fatter represent the assure that the Information presented to tho moat recent guldens andWhitehall plant operators accurately reflects the trend as stated in 10 CFR 30.92(c).A proposed . In level of reactor coolant in the vessel.Thus. amendment to an operating license available for coping with IGSCC problems at the proposed amendment does not involve a involves no significant hazards Wits.The proposed revision to the Technical Specifications will replan eluting reduction in a margin of safety. consideration if operation of the facility requirement,with new.more get0-0ate The staff has reviewed and agrees in accordance with the proposed requirements.The change dose not involve a • with the licensee's analysis of the amendment would not(1)involve a aigdficent hazards consideration for the significant hazards consideration significant increase in the probability or following 1.410111: determination.Based on the review and consequences of an accident previously 1.ICSCC can increase the potential for the above discussion,the staff proposes evaluated or(2)create the possibility of pipe breaks.Using the latest NRC valance to determine that the proposed change anew or different kind of accident from cal mane the Ucihties shalt'to detect does not involve a significant hazards any accident previously evaluated or(3) mitigate,and prevent IGSCC,thereby consideration. involve a significant reduction in a reducing the potential for piping integrity Local Public Document Room margin of safety. accident Therefore.the probability of an eat location:Calvert County Library,Prins Caitlin's Power A Ught CompenY(the e is not innessed The will n o detect a conerqu nceeo o Frederick.Marysnd licensee)has reviewed the proposed piping will not affect the ceasegveese d Attorney for licensee:Jay E.Silbert, changes and has determined that the accidents previously evaluated.The peaces Eat..Shaw.Pittman,Potts and requested amendments do not involves of ICSCC may increase the potential da Wpe 34366 Federal Regaater / Vol. 55, No. 183 /' Wednesday, August 22. 1990 / Notices rupture or leak however,the consequence NRC Project Director.Elinor C. • systems availability and unnecessarily will remain bounded by the exiting pipe Adensam challenge the plant safety systems. break analyses Therefore.the proposed changes 2.Operation of the facility will not change Detroit Edison Company,Docket No.Ss, involver an increase in the margin of as a result of this amendment This change 341,Fermi-2,Monroe Country.Michigan) safety. imposes the most recent NRC acceptable positions identified in Cl.eadl.These Date of amendment request February For the reasons stated above.the staff changes are y 1.1989 rag progremmatlall elated to proposes to determine that the proposed piping inspections and cannot create a new Description of amendment request amendment involves no significant or different kind of accident The amendment revises the Technical hazards consideration. ' 3.The NRC Staff recognizes and Specification(TS)by changing Trip Local Public Document Room • acknowledges In arabOr that if Staff Setpoints and Allowable Values for location:Monroe Country library apositions in dequate levels of f ylping in are tegrity Isolation Actuation Instrumentation System 3700 South Custer Road . egriry which are listed in TS Table 3.3.2-2. Monroe,Michigan 48181. reliability can be achieved Implementing the Isolation Actuation Instrumentation augmented surveillances endorsed by Gt491- SefDOiats Attorney for licensee:John Flynn. 01 does not cause any reduction in the margin Basis for proposed no significant Esq..Detroit Edison Company.2000 of safety. Second Avenue.Detroit,Michigan 48228. Proposed Change Number 3 hazards consideration determination: lVRC Project Director:Robert C. Increase the Reactor Coolant System(RCS) The Commission has provided Pierson leakage monitoring frequency in Surveillance standards for determining whether a Requirement 4.4.3.2.a from every 24 hours to significant hazards consideration exists Duke Power Company,et al.,Docket every 9 hours. as stated in 10 CFR 50.92(c).A proposed Nos.50.413 and 50-414,Catawba Basis amendment to an operating license for a Nuclear Station,Units 1 and 2,York The change does not involve a significant facility involves no significant hazards County,South Carolina hazards consideration for the following consideration if operation of the facility reasons: Date of amendment request March 13, 1.The proposed amendment does not in accordance with the proposed 1990 involve a significant increase in the amendment would not:(1)involve a probability or consequences of an accident significant increase in the probability or Description of amendment request previously evaluated because increasing the consequences of an accident previously The proposed amendments would revise frequency of RCS leakage monitoring is a evaluated:or(2)create the possibility of Technical Specifications rrso 3.7..2.5... programmatic change.Since this is not a a new or different kind Of accident from 3.1.2.5b.and 3.1.2.8x.and their process change,there la no physical change any accident previously evaluated:or(3) associated Bases.The revision would or alteration to the facility that could cause involve a significant reduction in a increase the existing minimum the probability of an accident to increase. margin of safety.Based on the staff contained borated water volumes 2.The proposed amendment does not review,the proposed amendment will required for the Boric Acid Tank(BAT) ' create the possibility of a new or different in Modes 1 t0 8(power Operation, kind of accident from any accident previously not involve a significant hazards startu ,hot standb ,hot shutdown,cold evaluated because the design of the facility consideration for the following reasons: p y and system operating parameters are not (1)The proposed change to the TS shutdown.and refueling)and the changing.Revision of the monitoring intervals finalizes the previously initial values for Refueling Water Storage Tank(RWST) for RCS leakage will not change the method isolation actuation instrumentation in Modes 5 and 8.The purpose of the in which leakage is monitored and therefore signals.Any necessary netpoint changes revision is t0 account for the unusable amot ovate a new or different kind of have been found to cause the associated volume due to discharge line location accident from any accident previously isolation actuation to occur in the same and other physical characteristics evaluated or a more conservative manner.The associated with the tanks.The water 3.The proposed amendment does not affected signals only actin response to volume required for the RWST in Modes involve a significant reduction in the margin 1 to 4 will not chime the axis of safety because monitoring the RCS leakage abnormal plant transients and do not ime as e tint every a hewn provides more conservatism play a part in any accident initiation level provides the maximum available than every u hours. scenario.Therefore the proposed volume to account for shutdown margin. The licensee has concluded that the changes do not involve a significant wont cue single failure.adequate proposed amendments meet the three increase in the probability or containment sump volume for transfer to standards in 10 CFR 50.92 and consequences of an accident previously sump recirculation and sufficient volume therefore.involve no significant hazards evaluated(2)Any necessary setpoint above the switchover initiation level consideration. changes solely changes the point of such that no operator action 1s required The N''RC staff has made a preliminary initiation of the isolation of the isolation prior to ten minutes after the initiation review of the licensee's no significant actuation function and not the manner of an accident hazards consideration determination or mode of operation of the affected Currently,the existing tank volumes and agrees with the licensee's analysis. systems.Where no setpofnt change was required for the BAT and RWST do not ' Accordingly.the Commission proposes found to be adequate system operation meet the design bases and are not to determine that the requested la unaffected.As such,the proposed conservative because they do not amendments do not involve a significant change does not present a new accident account for unusable tank volumes.The . hazards consideration. mode and does not create the possibility changes require that the BAT and - Loca!Public Document Room of a new or different kind of accident RWST levels be maintained to allow location:University of North Carolina at from any accident previously evaluated them to perform their required safety Wilmington.William Madison Randall (3)The proposed changes cause the functions. Library,801 S.College Road affected isolation function*to occur in Basis for proposed no significant Wilmington.North Carolina 28403-3297. the same or more conservative manner. hazards consideration determination: Attorney for licensee:R.E Jonas, The setpoints have also been evaluated The Commission has provided Central Counsel.Carolina Power ik and adjusted if required to reduce the standards for determining whether a Light Company,P.O.Box 1551.Raleigh. probability of a spurious isolation significant hazards consideration exists North Carolina 27002 occurring.Such isolations reduce the (10 f:'R 50.92(c)).A proposed Federal Register / Vol. 55. No. 163 / Wednesday. August 22, 1990 / Notices 34367 amendment to an operating license for a 3/4.3.3.&3/4.7.10 and 3/4.7.11.(2) the changes are administrative in name facility involves no significant hazards remove TS 0.22e and items in the index and an evaluation win be performed,to consideration if operation of the facility and applicable Bases sections,and(3) accordance with 10 CFR 30.50.for each in accordance with the proposed add TSB 6.5.1.12 6.6.Ih and 6.6.11. proposed things to the fire protection amendment would not:(1)involve a Essentially,the above changes would program. significant increase in the probability or remove the fire detention Accordingly.the Commission consequences of an accident previously instrumentation,suppression systems, proposes to determine that the evaluated:or(2)create the possibility of barrier penetrations and brigade staffing amendments do not involve a significant a new or different kind of accident from requirements from the TSe and add hazards consideration. any accident previously evaluated:or(3) administrative controls to support the Local Public Document Room involve a significant reduction in a fire protection program.Currently.the location:York County Library.138 Fast margin of safety. requirements for the relocated TSs exist Black Street.Rock Bill,South Carotins The proposed revision would not in plant procedures.These proposed 29730 involve a significant increase in the amendments will aub)ect future changes Attorney for licensee:Mr.Albert Carr. probability or consequences of an to these procedures to the additions.in poke power Company.422 South accident previously evaluated because Section 6.0.to the Iodating Church Street,Charlotte,North Carolina the BAT and RWST required volumes Administrative Controls requirements. 28242 are being increased to meet current The CL requirement to institute the NRC Project Director.David A design bases for the tanks.Current TS standard fire protection license Matthews required volumes are not conservative conditions has already been met because they do not account for Basis for proposed no significant Duke Power Company.Docket Noe.50- unusable tank volumes. hazards consideration determination: SM and 30470.McCue*Nuclear The proposed revision would not The Commission has provided Station.Units 1 and;Mecklenburg create the possibility of a new or standards for determining whether a County,Narth Carolina different kind of accident from any significant hazards consideration exists Dote of amendment request February accident previously evaluated because (10 CFR 50.92(c)).A proposed7.1900 the design of the facility 4 not changed amendment to an operating license for a 7,1990. t: supplemented May request and no new modes of operation are facility involves no significant hazards fkscrsptron of amendment regrrast introduced consideration if operation of the facility The licensee has proposed amendments Finally.the proposed revision would in accordance with the proposed to change the Technical Specifications not involve a significant reduction in a amendment would not(1)Involve a tea) response to NRC Centric Letter margin of safety because the BAT and significant increase in the probability or •which provided guidance for the RWST required minimum contained consequences of en accident previously relocation of the Radiological Effluent berated water volumes are being evaluated:or(2)create the possibility of Technical Specifications(RETS)as part increased to meet current design bases. a new or different kind of accident from of the lino-item TS improvement amendments Accordingly,the Commission any accident previously evaluated:or(3) wad(1)incorporategram.The proposrogrammatle proposes to determine that the involve a significant reduction in a amendments do not involve a significant margin of safety. controls in the Administrative Controls hazards consideration. The proposed amendments would not section of the TSs that satisfy the Local Public Document Room Involve a significant increase in the requirements of 10 CFR 20.106.40 CFR location:York County Library.138 East probability or consequences of an Part 190.10 CFR 50.36a and Appendix 1 Black Street Rock Hill.South Carolina accident previously evaluated because to 10 CFR Part 30A2)relocate the _9730 none of the technical requirements existing procedural details in current Attorney for licensee:Mr.Albert Carr. would be changed.The revision would TSs involving radioactive effluent Duke Power Company,422 South remove the existing requirements from monitoring Instrumentation.the Control Church Street.Charlotte,North Carolina the TSs and put them in Chapter 16.0 of of liquid and gaseous effluents. 28242 the FSAR While It is recognized that a egulpmant requirements for liquid and NRC Project Director.David B. comprehensive fire protection program gaseous effluents,radiological Matthews is essential to plant safety.many details environmental monitoring,and of this program that are currently radiological reporting details from the Duke Power Company,at a1..Docket addressed in the TSB can be modified in TSs to Chapter 16 of the Final Safety Nos.50413 and 60410.Catawba Nuclear Station Units 1 and;York accordance with the provisions of 10 Analysis Repoli(TSAR) "Selected CFR 50.59 without affecting nuclear Licata.*Commitment(SLC)Manual." • County,South Carolina safety.The additions.ln Section 6.0.to (3)relocate the definition of Date of amendment request March 13, the existing Administrative Controls solidification and existing procedural 1980.as supplemented May 4.1090 requirements would ensure that licensee details in the current TS On solid , Description of amendment request initiated changes will receive careful radioactive wastes to the SLC Manual. The proposed amendments would review by competent individuals. (4)simplify the associated reporting relocate the fire protection requirements The proposed amendments would not requirements.(5)simply the from the Technical Specifications(TSB) create the possibility of a new or administrative controls for changes to to the Final Safety Analysis Report different kind of accident from any the Offslte Dose Calculation Manua( (FSAR)Chapter 10.0.Catawba Selected accident previously evaluated because (ODCM)and Process Control Program Licensee Commitments.This relocation the design of Catawba Nuclear Station, (PCP).(6)add record retentia is in accordance with NRC Cenetic Unite 1 and 2.will not be affected and requirements for changes to the ODCM Letters(GL)8610 and 68.12. no new modes of operation will be and PCP,and(7)update the TS Index Specifically.the requested changes introduced. and the definitions of the ODCM and would:(1)remove the limiting Finally,the proposed amendments PCP consistent with these changes. conditions for operation(LCO)and would not involve a significant Basis for proposed no significant surveillance requirements(SRs)for TSs reduction in■margin of safety because hazards consideration determination 34368 Federal Register / Vol. SS. No. 183 / Wednesday. August 22, 1990 / Notices The Commission has provided The Commissions staff has accident previously evaluated or(3) standards(10 CFR 50.92(c))for considered the proposed changes and involve a significant reduction in a determining whether a significant agrees with the licensee's evaluation margin of safety. hazards consideration exists.A with respect to the three standards for In regard to the proposed proposed amendment to an operating determining the existence of a amendments.the licensee provided an license for a facility involves no significant hazards consideration. evaluation of the proposed revisions significant hazards consideration if On this basis,the Commission with respect to these three standards: operation of the facility In accordance proposes to determine that the proposed (1)The proposed amendments would . with the proposed amendment would amendments involve no significant revise TS 2.3 to provide a new setpoint not(1)Involve a significant increase in hazards consideration. for the reactor coolant pump monitor the probability or consequences of an Local Public Document Room trip functions.The proposed revision accident previously evaluated:or(2) location:Atkins Library,University of would require the pump monitors to create the possibility of a new or North Carolina.Charlotte(UNCC cause a reactor trip when a loss of two different kind of accident from any Station).North Carolina 28223 pumps occurs end the reactor is at a accident previously evaluated:or(3) Attorney for licensee:Mr.Albert Car. power level greater than 24%full power involve a significant reduction in a Duke Power Company,P.O.Box 1007. instead of the current 04%full power margin of safety. Charlotte,North Carolina 28242.1007 setp0int This modification ia consistent In regard to the proposed NRC Project Director.David B. with TS 12.5,that addresses the power amendments.the licensee provided an Matthews operation requirements.and provides evaluation of the proposed changes with Duke power Company.Docker Noe.50, the required tolerance for electrical respect to these three standards: 289.50-270 and� Nuclearnoises that can cause spurious reactor 1.The proposed changes are Station,Unita 1.2 and S.Ocooea County. trips at the present 0.0%full power administrative in nature since the South Carolina setpolnt level.Also.the proposed existing REI'S requirements are change has maintained and merely relocated to the Date of amendment request.July 19. as no sgnifieent impact on the McGuire SLC Manual.which is 1990 results of Final Safety Analysis Report controlled as part of the McGuire FSAR. Description of amendment request (FSAR)Chapter 15 analyses.Therefore. Any future changes to this information The proposed amendments would revise the requested amendments will not would be evaluated in accordance with Technical Specification(TS)2.3 to involve a significant increase in the the process described in 10 CFR 50.59. establish a revised Reactor Protective probability or consequences of a Under 10 CFR 50,59,changes may be System(RDS)trip setpolnt for the previously evaluated accident. made without prior Commission Reactor Coolant Pump monitors.This (2)The proposed change to TS 2.3 approval if the licensee has determined revision would require the pump would increase the Dump monitor Wp that an unreviewed safety question is monitors to produce a reactor trip when setpolnt from 04%full power to 2.0%full not involved.A report of such changes is two pumps are inoperable and the power.This change would serve to required to be submitted to the reactor is operating at greater than 2.0% Prevent spurious reactor trips due to Commission annually. full power instead of the current electrical noise during a subcdt(cal No hardware changes or additions requirement which considers a power condition with two reactor coolant would be made t0 the McGuire Nuclear level greater than 0.0%of the rated pumps in operation.The proposed Station as a result of these proposed power as the setpoint Licensee Event setpoints will not create new failure amendments.There would be no Report(LER)289/90-08,dated May 30, modes not bounded by previously increase in the types or amounts of 1990,identified a reactor trip caused by evaluated accident events.Therefore,it radioactive effluent releases,nor an electrical noise which indicated reactor is not expected that the proposed - increase in individual or cumulative power higher than 0.0%full power change would create the possibility of a occupational radiation exposures as a setpolnt.The reactor was subcrlticaL new or different kind of accident from result of these changes.As such,these two reactor coolant pumps were any kind of accident previously changes will not involve an increase in, operating,and the control rods from analyzed. the probability or consequences of any Group 1 were 50%inserted.while those (3)The proposed revision to TS 2.3 accident previously evaluated. of Croups 2 through 7 were fully would revise the Reactor Protective 2.As stated above,the proposed inserted.By letter dated July 19.1990. System setpolnt for the pump monitor changes are administrative in nature Duke Power Company proposed TS trip functions to a higher percent of the and involve no changes in RETS revisions to correct thin unacceptable full power value.This change was requirements,hardware modifications operating condition. proposed to prevent spurious reactor or increases in radioactive effluent Basis for proposed no significant trips due to electrical noise In the releases or personnel occupational hazards consideration determination: Reactor Protective System trip function. • exposure.Therefore,the proposed The Commission has provided The proposed change has no significant changes will not create the possibility of standards(10 CFR 50.02(c))for effect on FSAR Chapter 15 analyses and a new or different kind of accident from determining whether s significant will increase the margins of safety by any accident previously evaluated. hazards consideration exists.A preventing reactor trips which Could • 3.The existing REFS requirements proposed amendment to an operating result in unanalyzed plant operating will be maintained as part of the license for a facility involves no conditions.Therefore,this change does McGuire SLC Manual and will continue significant hazards consideration if not Involve a significant reduction in a to provide adequate controls for operation of the facility in accordance margin of safety., radioactive effluent releases and for with the proposed amendment would The Commission's staff has radiological environmental monitoring not:(1)Involve a significant increase in considered the proposed changes and activities.As such.the proposed the probability or consequences of an agrees with the licensee's evaluation amendments would not involve a accident previously evaluated or(2) with respect to the three standards.On significant reduction in a margin of create the possibility of a new or this basis.the Commission proposes to safety. different kind of accident from any determine that the proposed Federal Register / Vol. SS, No. 163 / Wednesday, August 22. 1990 / Notices 34389 amendments involve no significant change does not affect plant configuration having the automatic closure interlocks hazards consideration. nor its operation.Consequently,operating the V.CI).The Generic fetter encouraged Local Public Documgat Room plant with the proposed changes will not the replacement of ACI with a safety-. create the possibility of a new or different location:Oconee County Library.501 kind of accident from an accident prevtowly grade alarm and administrative controls. West South Broad Street.Walhalla, evaluated y The proposal by the licensee implements South Carolina 29691 Safety margin is established through the the changes encouraged by the Generic Attorney for licensee:J.Michael Waterford 3 safety analyses as reflected in Letter. McGarry,III,Bishop.Lieberman.Cook, the Technical Specifications,Waiting The licensee has provided the Purcell and Reynolds.120017th Street Conditions for Operations,and our bases. following analysis of significant hazards NW.,Washington.DC 20036 Since the proposed changes preserve all consideration: . NRC Project Director:David B. sesumptions and results for the safety ACI removal is consistent veldt the Matthews analyses.then is no reduction in any margin guidelines previously endorsed by the NRC of safety related to the changes. and will result th a net increase in reactor Entergy Operations Inc.,Docket No.5s. We have reviewed the licensee's safety,There is a negligible(ODA)therein 342,Waterford Steam Electric Station, analysis and agree with the findings. in the calculated probability of an interfacing Unit 3,St.Charles Parish,Louisiana Therefore,the staff proposes to system LOCA event associated with Aa Date of amendment request July 25. determine,that the change does not removal.This Mange is In contrast toa art teen a significant hazards increase in MKS and LTOP availability serf P q consideration •corresponding decrease in risk associated Descri tion of amendment request: L Oeal Public Document Room with low of SOC and LTOP events The proposed amendment would revise Therefore,the proposed change will mutt in the Technical Specifications to change Location:University of New Orleans a net decrease in risk. the organizational structure and position Library,Louisiana Collection,Lakefront Deletion of the ACI surveillance titles to reflect the changes brought New Orleans.Louisiana 70122 requirement does not create the possibility of about by he transfer of operation to Attorney for licensee:Ernest L Blake, a new or different kind of accident from any Entergy Operations,Inc.,from Louisiana Esq.,Shaw,Pittman.Potts and previously evaluated.Alarms end procedures Power and Light Company.The change Trowbridge,2300 N St..NM., will Inform the operators to take timely in operations was a roved by License Washington.DC 20037 actions when necessary,fulfilling the same Pp NRC Project Director.Theodore R. function as the ACL The alarms will be Amendment No.80 dated December 14, Quay Acting Project Director capable of detecting equipment failures. 1989. whereas the no protects only against . Basis for proposed no significant Entergy Operations Inc..Docket!in.50- operator error(failure to establish•double hazards consideration determination: 382,Waterford Steam Electric Station, barrier between the RCS and SDCS). The Commission has provided Unit 3,SL Castles Parish,Louisiana As dismissed above,analysts demonstrates standards for determining whether a Dote o amendment re seat sal 25, ACT removal results.n a net increase In significant hazards consideration exists f q July reactor safety,Appropriate alarms and as stated in i0 CFR 50.92(c).A proposed pm procedures will accomplish the same function amendment to an opera license fora Description of amendment request as AO.that fa ensuring isolation of the The proposed amendment would revise SDCS from the RCS before RCS pressure facility involves no significant hazards the Technical Specification to remove exceeds SVCS design pressure.At the same consideration if operation of the facility the surveillance requirement for the time the probability of a loss of SDC event is in accordance with the proposed automatic closure interlocks and:o add significantly reduced.Thus.removal of the u mendment would not:(I)involve a surveillance requirements for the open ACI surveillance requirement does not eignifiicant increase in the probability or permissive interlock and isolation valve involve aqy regal ftoant seduction s a mugs consequences of an accident previously position alarms on the shutdown cooling of safety. evaluated:or(2)create the possibility of system.This request:s in response to We have reviewed the licensee a new or different kind of accident from Generic Letter 88.17. analysis and agree with the findings. • any accident previously evaluated or(3) Basis for proposed no significant Therefore,the staff proposes to involve a significant reduction in a - determine that the change does not hazards mi s ion has provided inat o:t: significant hazard margin of safety.The licensee provided The Commission has provided involve a i on analysis that addressed the above standards for de consideration. three standards in the amendment termiring whether a Local Public Document Room application, significant hazards consideration exists Location:University of New Oilcans The licensee has provided an analysis 6°stated in 10 CI'it 50.9.(c).A proposed Library,Louisiana Collection,Lakefront.p y amendment to an o eratir license for a of the significant hazards consideration facility involves no significant hazards New Orleans,Louisiana 70122 ae follows: consideration If operation of the facility Attorney for licensee:Ernest L Blake, The proposed changes to the in accordance with theproposed Esq.,Shaw,Pittman,Potts and Administrative Controls section involve only amendaent would not:(1)involve a Trowbridge.2300 N St..N.W.the reestUgnment of responsibilities from the Washington,DC 211037 Senior Vice President-Nuclear Operations si�cant increase in the probability or ngt n• and Vice President-Nuclear to the new Vice consequences of an accident previously NRC Project Director.Theodore R President Operations,The scope of all evaluated;or(2)create the possibility of Quay,Acting Project Director reaponsibilities remains unchanged;that is, a new or d fferent kind of accident from Florida Power Corporation et at.ni r•ket no responsibilities have been deleted and any accident previously evaluated;or(3) No.50.702,Crystal River Unit No.3 none have been added.Since the change fa involve a significant reduction in a essentially administrative.there le no margin of safety.The licenses provided moms Nuclear Generating Plant Citrus alteration to the existing facility or is an analysis that addressed the above comity. operation,and there is no increase in probability or consequence of any accident three standards in the amendment Date of amendment request.'April 6. previously evaluated. application. 1990 AB previously stated,the proposed changes Generic Letter 88-17 dated October 17, Description of amendment request affect the eseignment of executive duties and WM addressed the potential for loss of The Crystal River Unit 3(CR-3) the changing of position titles,only.This shutdown cooling events with plants Technical Specifications(TS)require 34370 Federal Register / Vol. 55, No. 183 / Wednesday, August 22. 1990 / Notices periodic inserviee inspection of a z.Create the possibility of a new or of each diesel.Therefore,in order for representative sample of tubes from the different kind of accident from any accident the load testing to be meaningful,the steam generators.At present a tube that prssieualy ayslua"A sleeved tube load at which the test le performed exhibits a through-wall reduction of 40% ptrfomts the sans function le the same should be changed The proposed is isolated from service by means of a passive manner,as unthawed tabs.Tuba changes would put the TS surveillance sleeves are alified.end tube plug.The proposed change would m er maintained underrthe ed mess end pressure requirement in line with the enhanced allow the installation of mechanical limits of ASME Section 111 and draft NRC capacity of the diesel.The changes tube sleeves In the CR-3 steam Regulatory Guide viz1.Eddy cunent testing would also remove the surveillance generators as an alternative to plugging (ECI')ie performed following installation of requirements on automatic load defective tubes,and would exclude each sleeve.This is done to verify proper sequencing in modes S and 8,and defects spanned by a sleeve from the Installation of the sleeve and to obtain• remove two notes that are no longer results cats for future ---' a ECf reeding for each sleeve la order category determination applicable. 8 to monitor for subsequent degradation of the r. inspection requirements.Reporting pressure boundary. Basis for proposed no significant requirements for sleeved tubes, 9Involve a significant reduction in the hazards consideration determination: definitions for"Tube"or'Tubing,"and margin of safety provided by current The Commission has provided limits oa the number of sleeved tubes Technical Specifications.OTSC tube integrity standards for determining whether a permitted would be added is maintained under the same limits for significant hazards consideration exists Basis forproposed nos I significant sleeved tubes as for unaleeved tubes:le., 10 CFR 50.92(c)).A proposed f �f ASME Section III and NRC draft Regulatory ( p p hazards consideration provided determination: Guide 1.121.The value of OTSC pressure amendment t0 err operating license for e The Cor un(asion has yrovided criteria boundary degradation at which a tube facility involves no significant hazards for determining whether a significant becomes inoperable remains unchanged and consideration if operation of the facility hazards consideration exists(10 CFR is detectable for sleeves as well as plugs.The in accordance with the proposed 50,92(c)).A proposed amendment to an Technical Specifications continue to require amendment would not:(1)involve a operating license for a facility involves monitoring and restriction of primary(RCS) significant increase in the probability or no significant hazards considerations if to secondary system leakage through the consequences of an accident previously operation of the facility in accordance steam generators,such that there is evaluated:or(2)create the possibility of with the proposed amendment would reasonable assurance that a signiticant a new or different kind of accident from not:(1)involve a significant increase in increase in leakage,due to failure of a any accident previously evaluated:or(3) the probability or consequences of an sleeved(or uneteeved)tube will be detected involve a significant reduction in a D The slight reduction in RCS flow and full• accident previously evaluated:or(2) power steam superheat due to sleeviog the margin of safety.The licensee evaluated create the possibility of a new or maximum number of OTSC tubes allowed la the proposed changes in light of these different kind of accident from any considered to have an insignificant impact on throe criteria and determined that the . accident previously evaluated:or(3) OTSG operation during accident condition& proposed amendment would not: involve a significant reduction in a The Technical Specifications will continue to 1.Involve a significant increase In the margin of gaiety.The licensee evaluated contain which had Nei*degradations lea esed probability or consequence of■n accident the proposed changes in light of these spanned previously evaluated because[these) three criteria and has determined that (regardless whether the tube is plugged or change(*)(provide]assurance that proper 64e proposed changes will not sleeved), testing le performed to assure the diesel 1.Involve a significant Increase in the The staff has performed a preliminnry generators will perform their intended safety probability or commit .ace of an accident review of the licensee's proposed function should they be called upon to do so. previously evaluated The pt-O Final Safety Changes and agrees that the criteria of 2.Create the posaibifrty of a new of Analysis Report(FSAR)contains a 10 CFR 50.92 are met.Therefore,the different kind of accident from any accident consennUve analysis of several accidents staff proposes to determine that the previously evaluated because the proposed which could affect O1SG tube integrity,and proposed amendment involves no changes)(assure)testing is performed to the sleeves proposed for installation in CR-3 significant hazards consideration. confirm the asstmtptions of electrical power were de■igned•wlth consideration for these Local Public Document Room availability in the safety*nabob accidents,The sleeves are considered location:Crystal River Public Library, documented in FSAR Chapter 14 remain structural members,designed in accordance valid. with ASME Section III and draft NRC 888 N.W.First Avenue,Crystal River, 3.Involve•significant reduction in the Regulatory Guide t.r21,and have been Florida 32929. margin of safety because(these]changers) demonstrated to meet normal,upset, Attorney for licensee:A.H.Stephens,. (change]the diesel generator load testing emergency,and faulted conditions resulting General Counsel,Florida Power requirements to reflect current plant design. from normal operations and accident COrpOration,MAC-ASD,P.O.Box 14042, The margin of safety with reaped to the transients.Furthermore.the sleeves have St.Petersburg,Florida 33733. previous values and plant design remains the been demonstrated to be mechanically IVRC Project Director Herbert N. same' stronger than the tubes themselves,making a Berkow. The staff has performed a preliminary - sleeved tube no more likely to rupture, review of the licensee'•proposed collapse or be pulled apart than an unsleeved Florida Power Corporation,et al., changes and agrees that the criteria of tube.Therefore,the probability of■ Docket No.50.302.Crystal River Unit 10 CFR 50.02 are mat In addition.the previously evaluated accident is not Na 3 Nuclear Generating Plant,Citrus staff believes that these three criteria • significantly increased due to installation of ran_„, mamaain are met for the removal of surveillance sl in the OTSC. The consequences of a previously Dote of amendment request:May 10, sequencing requirements on automatic modes S and load and the evaluated accident are also not significantly 1990 Increased es a result of the installation of Description of amendment request: removal of the two totes.Since the OTSC tube sleeves,The Reactor Coolsnt The Technical Specifications(TS)for accidents for which the automatic load System(RCS)flow rate through•sleeve is Crystal River Unit 3 require that every sequencing is provided cannot occur in reduced such that to the unlikely event a 15 months the licensee perform various modes 5 sad 8.removal of the sleeved tuba does rupture,prlmary.to- )sari testa on the em diesel surveillance requirements would not that ass ry system leakage world is less than emergency last refueling involve a significant increase in tha that re of an la the safety to analysis for the ma,thgenerators.During u last upgraded the rapture of an unsleeved tube outage,the licensee upgraded the rating probability or consequences previously Federal Register / Vol. SS. No. 163 / Wednesday, August 22, 1990 / Notices 34371 evaluated:create the possibility of a conservatively established with the more possibility of a new or different kind of i new or different kind of accident from bounding turbine trip without bypass accident from any accident previously any accident previously evaluated:or transient evaluated. involve a significant reduction in a The staff has reviewed the proposed C.Operation of the facility in . margin of safety.Also.the removal of amendment and agrees with the accordance with the proposed the two notes that are no longer licensee's determination that it does net amendment would not Involve• applicable is an administrative change involve a significant hazards significant reduction In a ma n of • that has no safety significance. consideration. safety.Reasonable assurance of Therefore,the staff proposes to Loca!public Document Room operability of the equipment still is determine that the proposed amendment rotation:Ocean County Library, provided at frequencies consistent with does not involve significant hazards Reference Department,101 Washington the Standard Technical Specifications. considerations. Street.Toms River,New Jersey 08753 The NRC staff has reviewed the GPU • Local Public Document Room Attorney for licensee:Ernest L Blake. Nuclear Corporation determination and location:Crystal River Public Libra Jr.,Esquire,Shaw,Pittman,Potts a Library. Trowbridge.230 agrees with their analysis.Accordingly. 808 N.W.First Avenue,Crystal River, Washington. 300 N NDC Street,NW, the Commission proposes to determine Florida 32829 NRC Project D/rector.John F.Stolz 37. that the proposed amendment involves Attorney for licensee:A.H.Stephens, no significant hazards consideration. General Counsel,Florida Power GPU Nuclear Corporation.et alp Dodmt Local Public Document Room Corporation,MAC-A5D,P.O.Box No.50.289,Throe Mile Island Nuclear location:Government Publications 14042,St.Petersburg,Florida 33733 Station,Unit No.1,Dauphin County, Section.State Library of Pennsylvania, NRC Project Director.Herbert N. Pennsylvania Walnut Street and Commonwealth Berkow Dale of omendment request June la, Avenue.Box 160'1.Harrisburg. ' GPU Nuclear Corporation.et al..Docket 1990 Pennsylvania 17105. No.50.219,Oyster Creek Nuclear Description of amendment request: Attorney for licensee:Retest L Blake. Generating Station.Ocean County,New This amendment would change the Jr..Esquire,Shaw,Pittman,Potts a lersey Technical Specifications to extend the Trowbridge,2300 N Street NW, Date of amendment request:July 10, surveillance interval for testing the Washington.DC 20037. 1990 hydrogen recombiner system. NRC Project Director.John F.Stolz Description of amendment request: Basis farproposad no significant . Houston Lighting R Power Company. The licensee proposes to reduce the low hazards consideration determination: City Public Sendai Bard of San condenser vacuum scram setpoint in CPU Nuclear has determined that this Antonio.Central Power and Light Table 3.1.1 from 23 inches Hg to 20 proposed change poses no significant Company,City of Austin,Texas.Docket inches Hg and revise the bases to hazards as defined by the NRC in 10 Nos.50.198 and 50.499.South Texas support the new setpoint CFR 50.92 Reducing the A.Operation of the facility in �)am Units 1 and 2 Matagorda setpoint to 20 inches Hg will better minty.Texas accordance with the proposed accommodate routine condenser amendment would not involve a Date of amendment request June 6, becicwaehing operations. significant increase in the probability of 1990 Basle for proposed no significant hazards consideration determination: occurrence or consequences of an Description of amendment request: As required by 10 CFR 50.91(a),CPU accident previously evaluated.The The request is a change to the Technical Nuclear Corporation has determined proposed Change revises the current Specifications to delete the automatic that operation of the Oyster Creek surveillance frequency of the hydrogen closure interlock on the Residual Heat Nuclear Generating Station in recombines to be consistent with the Removal System suction valves.The accordance with the proposed technical safety significance of the system and the Automatic Closure Interlock(AC) specification involves no significant surveillance frequency in the Babcock feature of the Residual Heat Removal hazards consideration as defined in 10 and Wilcox Standard Technical (RFIR)suction valves provides for CFR 50.92. Specifications.The operability of the automatic closure of the valves to Operation of the facility in accordance equipment is not affected because TMI-1 whenever the Reactor Coolant System with the proposed amendment would not has two(2)installed 10096 capacity (RCS)pressure increases above a level involve a significant Memo.in the hydrogen recombines and a hydrogen approximating the RHR system design probability of occurrence or the recombiner is not required t0 operate pressure and is intended to ensure that consequences of an accident previously until apprordmately 9.8 days following a the double barrier(two closed valves in evaluated.No credit is taken for the low loss of coolant accident(LOCH).The each suction line)is not compromised condenser vacuum scram in any of the results of this change will not result in by operator error during plant startup. transients analyzed in the FSAR.The turbine any increase in the probability or However,during RHR operation.the trip without bypass transient bounds the ion consequences of events analyzed in presence of the ACI offers the potential of condenser vacuum scenario. 20 Operation of the facility!n accordance Chapter 14 of the Toff-1 FSAR. for inadvertent closure of the valves and with the proposed amendment would not B.Operation of the facility in subsequent lose of cooling. create the possibility of a new or different accordance with the proposed Bosie for proposed no significant kind of accident from any accident previously amendment would not create the hazards consideration determination: evaluated.The scram function on low possibility of a new or different kind of The Commission has provided vacuum is still being preserved,and an accident from any accident previously standards for determining whether a evaluation has demonstrated that the lower evaluated.The TMI-1 FSAR states that significant hazards consideration exists setpoint provides en acceptable response to operability of hydrogen recombiner is as stated in 10 CFR 50,92(c).A proposed loss of vacuum scenarios. not lured until approximatel 9.s amendment to an operating license for a 3.0 he Operation of the facility in saki no accordance daysollo a Y � � with the proposed amendment would notwing LOCH.The proposed facility involves no significant hazards involve a significant reduction in•margin of revision to the hydrogen recombiner consideration if operation of the facility safety.Operating limits for the plant ere surveillances does not affect the in accordance with the proposed 34372 Federal Register / VoL 55. No. 183 / Wednesday. August 22. 1990 / Notices amendment would not:(1)involve a mitigate an overpressure transient and For the reasons stated above,the staff significant increase in the probability or the RHR discharge relief valve,arc not believes these proposed amendments consequences of an accident previously utilized in the analysis for mitigation of involve no significant hazards evaluated or(2)create the possibility of an overpresaurization transient While it consideration determination. a new or different kind of accident from is true that the ACI initiates an Local Public Document Rooms any accident previously evaluated:or(3) automatic closure of the RHR suction Location:Wharton County Junior ir.volve a significant reduction in a valves on high RCS pressure. College.J.M.Hodges Learning Center, margin of safety.Based on the staff overpressure protection of the Mir 911 Boling Highway.Wharton Texas • review.the proposed amendments will system is provided by the MR system rugs not: relief valves and not by the slow acting Attorney for licensee:Jack R. (2)Involve a significant increase in suction valves that isolate the RHR Newman.Esq..Newman h Holrzinger. the probability or consequences of an system from the RCS.The deletion of p,C.,11115 L Street.NW,Washington,DC ' accident previously evaluated.The the ACI will decrease plant risk because 200 accidents previously evaluated are the without the RHR suction valves closed NRC Project Director Christopher I. WASH-1400 interfacing LOCA,RCS due to the ACI.the RHR relief valves NRC cold overpressure mitigation,and a loss provide additional redundancy. of RHR capability. The STP drs;gn prevents bypassing Illinois Power Company and Soylaed The probabilistic analysis performed containment which is part of the classic Power Cooperative,ix,cosset No.SO- by the licensee used a baseline case of interfacing systems LOCA.the"V' 481•Clinton Power Station.Unit No.1. the ACI feature In the RHR system.This sequence.The RHR is completely DeWitt County,l knots was followed by an analysis without the contained in containment and this ACI feature.The analysis results design feature prevents bypassing Dote of amendment request:April 27. concluded that the deletion of the ACI containment The purpose of ACI 1990 results in a decrease in the likelihood of feature is to ensure there is a double Description of amendment request.• loss of RIM during a seven week barrier between the RIM system and the The proposed amendment would revise misslon time from 7.43E-03 to 1.07E-04. RCS when the plant is at normal the Technical Specifications to . The evaluation of an RHR interfacing operating conditions.(i.e..pressurized incorporate new pressure/temperature systems LOCA at the South Texas and not in the RIM cooling mode).There limits as requested by NRC Generic Project Units 1 and 2(STP)resulted in are several methods to ensure that there Letter 88-11 and in accordance with the the conclusion that the LOCA would not la a double barter between the RHR information provided in NRC Regulatory bypass containment Therefore,the system and the RCS when the plant Is in Guide 1.99 Revision 2. containment would prevent the direct the normal operating mode.First,plant Bosis for proposed no significant release of radioactive material to the operating procedures instruct the hazards consideration determination: environment in the remote event of core operators to isolate the RHR system The Commission has provided uncovery and two trains of low head during plant heatup. standards for determining whether a safety injection(LIG!)would be Second.an alarm will be installed as significant hazards consideration exists available for mitigation due to the part of this change that will annunciate as stated in 10 CFR 50.92.A proposed design of SIP.Cold overpressure in the control room when a RHR auction amendment to an operating license for a mitigation at STP is provided by the valve is open and the RCS is at pressure. facility involves no significant hazards pressurizer power operated relief In conjunction with this alarm•the alarm consideration if operation of the facility valves.The residual heat removal response procedure will be revised to in accordance with a proposed discharge relief valves are not required ensure that the RHR suction valves are amendment would not(1)involve a to operate to mitigate the consequences closed upon alarm indication.Third•the significant increase in the probability or of an overpressurization event at low open permissive interlock.which is not consequence,of an accident previously reactor coolant system temperature. being removed.will prevent the opening evaluated(2)Create the possibility of a • With the RHR discharge relief valves of the RHR suction valves unless the new or different kind of accident from available(e.g.,ACC deleted),plant risk is RCS pressure is substantially below the any accident previously evaluated.or(3) decreased because of the additional RHR design pressure. involve a significant reduction in a redundancy available to mitigate an Since the PORVa prevent margin of safety. overpressure transient occurring at low o verpressurization of the RHR system The licensee has provided the RCS temperatures. during shut down conditions and several following analysis of no significant The deletion of the ACI was analyzed other methods are available to ensure hazards considerations uairrg the in WCAP•11738 in terms of(1)the that the RBA system is isolated from the Commission',standards. frequency of an]nterfecing LOCA.(2) RCS during normal plant operating (1)The proposed changes have been the availability of the RHR system.and conditions.removal of the ACI does not developed consistent withuplatory Guide (3)the effect on overpressure transients create the possibility of a new or 1,00•Revision 2 and result In higher Adjusted with the net result of a safety benefit. different kind of accident from any Reference Temperatures(AR'h).As a result, The staff approved WCAP-1130 for accident previously evaluated. the proposed changes result la more , generic applications. (3)Involve a significant reduction in a conservative erasure/temperate»limits With the above considerations it is margin of safety.The probabilistic Additionally,the proposed clumps do not concluded that the deletion of the RHR analysis performed for the deletion of result m e change to plant operation. ACI does not involve a signficant the ACI at STP indicates there is a Therefore.these rimmed changes do not increase in the probability or decrease in the likelihood of a loss of result in a significant increase in the consequences of an accident previously RHR The potential for an interfacing proviousl y or h nasqu®ca of any accident evaluated. systems[ACA and low.tempersture p1°)These proposed (2)Create the possibility of a new or ova ressurization transients have been (2)These proposed o w n do net»sins ts different kind of accident from any evaluated with the ACI deleted. result change wto tail plant»Its repndo u As a »salt no new failure mocha a»introduced. previously evaluated.The Power Therefore.the overall safety has been Therefore,the proposed changes cannot Operated Relief Valves(PORVa)at STP increased. create the possibility of a new or different Federal Register / VoL SS. No. 283 / Wednesday. August 2'2, 2860 / Notices 34371 kind of accident horn any accident previonsly standards,the licenser provided the the proposedTenhoIal Specification SWIM evaluated.s The proposed changes have been following analytic do nor not afbet aey operant preetieee or limn* 10 developed consistent with Regulatory Guide with Operettas of enfacility istoo>oeek!not safe The rousedchanges ha ea eaesat� 1.99.Revision 2,and result in higher ARTS. Reposed t*wotdd administrative in natures ind will not Induct As a result the proposed changes reautt m meet►•a sigrr incites hots Prop probability v luted.comediennes of an atcidenl the margin d ps re more conservative pressure/temperature previously evaiw4d The staff has reviewed the licensee's limits.Therefore,these proposed changes do implementation of the proposed nos ant hazard•consideration • not result to a significant reduction in the amendment would not increase the significant margin of safety. probability of occurrence of an accident determination staff agreis.Sated upon this The staff has reviewed the licensee's review,the staff agrees with the plea;acs:yeport(A R beamet sac licensee's no'trim-ant hazard& ety rosigaificanthazardaeonaideration AnslysraRrpmr(PS/tRllsecansethexdderrt . determination and agrees with the conditions and assumptions are not affected consideration determination analystt licensee's analysis.The staff,therefore, by the proposed Technical Specification flamed upon the above discussion.the proposes to determine that the licensee's changes.The proposed changes do not staff proposes to determine that the request does not involve a significant involve•tent.experiment.or a modification propo•ed change does not involve• hazards consideration. to a Byrom.Theproposed changes are significemt hazards consideration. Local Public Docc neat Room ed:ninistrative in name and do net increase ?Public Document..Room the probabioty el*novitiate of an accident location:Vespasian Warner Public previously evaluated. location:t�seasset Pabuc Roo. High Library.120 West Johnson Street, implementation of the proposed Street,P.O.Box 307.Wiacasset Maine Clinton,Illinois 6172, amendment would not increase the 0457a Attorney for licensee:Sheldon Zabel, consequences of an accident previously Attorney far licenses John A.Ritaher. Esq.,Schiff,Hardin and Waite,7200 evaluated in the FSAR becausefheaccldeit Esquire.Ropes and Cray.=Franklin Sears Tower.233 Wacker Drive. conditions and assumptions are not affected Street Boston.Massachusetts 02110 Chicago,Illinois 00600 by the proposed Taal:dui Specification NRC project Director.John N.Hannon changes.License operatore will continue to IOW Acting Project Director. Victor operate the pram under the supervision of the Nenea Maine YanICOO Atomic Power Company, Shift OperatirgSupervisorand/or doe Plant Docket No.50.309,Maine Yankee Shift Superintendent who are required to hold �Takeo� YMaiae mic posttreatment Atomic Power Station,Lincoln County, tercet SRO licenses.The proposed changes Atoadc Power SLtlo vfaine do not Involve a test.experimentora n.Lincoln County. ., modification ma system.The proposed Maine Date of amena'irent request:Jay b, changes are administrativeInmatme end do 1990,as supplemented on July 30.1900. not inane.the consequences of an accident 1990 Dare e amendment request`July 1a _ Description of amendment request• previously evaluated The proposed amendment would modify (2)Use of the raraned specification would Da+uiPtien of osmndmenl segues& the Techrical Specifications(TS) not create the possibility d•new oe different The proposed amendment would modify associated with the facility qualification kind o[accident from any accident previouslyTerbuirat Specification a."Operations evaluated re quirements Manager.The Operations owed Use of the modified specification would not Systems,and Aedd Monitoring .Departmentger pro p create tine possibility for an accident of a charge would modify the TS ouch that different type than any swanned previously Systems"byctheThrff the hypesa the Manager,Operations must:(1)hold in the FSAR because the accident conditions conditions for reactor system pressure a Senior Operator's license,termed and assumptions are not affected by the from lass than PM psis to less the Senior Reactor Operator(SRO)license proposed Technical Specification changea 1700 pais.The proposed modification of a t Maine Yankee,or(2)have at one time The proposed changes do aot involve a test this specification is the result of regent held an s.°license at Maine Yankee. or experiment.or a modification to•system analysis of safety system setpo(at The proposed change would also and do not affect any plant equipment or uncertainties which have effectively update the T S to ref'ect the licensee's operational prouder•which could tea* reduced the window between the current practice that the Shift Operating the possibility of a different accidentS Supervior mitaf hold an SRO license, s Licensed operators will continue to oparata bypass setpoint and the Satiety (SSI>) Dosis orproposed no e' ni significant the pleat rintades the supervisionhiltOperating of the PlantActuation Signal Infection f r8 f� Shift SnpaintmdentfSblft fin (SL4SJ setptrtat from hazards consideration determination Supervisor who an requited*ohold current the originals=paid to Tl paid.Art The Commission has provided SRO lketuea The proposed changes art increase le the SSPhypese Mean standards for determining whether a administrative in nature and involve no specification velvets needed to restore significant hazards consideration exists acctdmt game °.Oa matters related to the 100 paid differential and inns reduce (10 CFR 50.92(c)).A proposed nuclear safety.all accidents are bounded by the potential for an inadvertent safety • amendment to an operating license for a Drevbwanalyses lad ao Da"dente an infection event. fat lityinvolves nos cite ficant hazards en Use of the modified specification would not Basis for propane Inosignificant considerations if operation of the facility tonne the passibility fora malfunction of a hazaids°Wei ?tkr deferrib ton in accordance with a proposed defame type than any evaluated prenantly The Commtasbn naaprovidee amendment would not:(t)involve a in the FSAR because no station equipment is atandards for determining whether a significant increase in the probability or betas modified by the proposed Technical significant hazards considerationartiste corn;equencea of an accident previously Specificattm changes.The mopased changes 00 CFR 50.92(0.Aproposed evaluated;(2)create the possibility of a do not+evolve atest or experiment ore amendment to an operating License for a new or different kind of accident from modifition m a system costa which could facility involves no sigificant hazards an accident previously evaluated:or(3) a maacarent""4"" csionKazi n{" considerations if tfeaofthe facility involve a significant reduction in 8 (3)Use of the modified specification would 81 accordance wit�t io sad not involve a significant reduction fn■ proposed margin of safety. margin of safety. amendment would not(1)invite a The licensee addressed the above Use of the modeled apeciGcetioa would not significant bureau in the prehehili>y en three standards in the amendment reduce the margin of safety as definedin the consolation of a9 accident pnevtoastlr application.In regard to the three basis of any Technical Specification because evaluated:(2)create the possibility of• 34374 Federal Register / VoL 55, No. 183 / Wednesday. August 22. 1990 / Notices new or different kind of accident from and the safety relief valves from plus or therefore.made a proposed an accident previously evaluated:or(3) minus 1%to plus or minus 396. determination that the licensee stequest involve a significant reduction in a Basis forprvposed no significant does not involve a significant hazards margin of safety. hazards consideration determination:In consideration. The licensee addressed the above accordance with the requirements of 10 Local,Public Document Room three standards in the amendment CFR 50.9^„the licensee has submitted location:Auburn Public Library.118 application.Ln regard to the three the following no significant hazards 15th Street,Auburn.Nebraska 88305 standards,the licensee provided the determination: Attorney for licensee:Mr.G.D. • following analysis. 1.Does the proposed license amendment Wat.on.Nebraska Public Power (t)Operation of the facility in accordance involve a eigntficant increase in the District.Post Office Box 499,Columbus. with the proposed amendment would not probability or consequences of an accident Nebraska 09002.0499 Involve a significant increase in the previously evaluatedt probability or consequences of an accident Evaluation: NRC Project Director.Richard F. . previously evaluated The proposed change will not involve a Dudley,Acting The ESF bypass setpons has not been used significant increase in the probability or Nebraska Public Power District.Docket in FSAR chapter 14 safety analyses and thus consequences of an accident previously No,risk n,Coo Nuclear tic t.Station. will not affect the current safety analyses. evaluated because the transient and accident No.50- County.D Assuring that an adequate operational RCS consequences are within the required Nebraska pressure window indite to allow bypassing acceptance criteria.The valve nominal Date of amendment request.Jury 2, the ESFs is important to reduce the setpoints are not being changed The valve probability of an inadvertent safety injection eetpoint,will be returned to within 1%of 1990 event during■normal plant eooldown, their nominal setting before being returned to Description of amendment request In (2)Use er the modified specification would service so valve performance la not affected. response to the NRC staffs request in not create the possibility of■new or different The recommended surveillanal requirements Generic Letter 88-10.the licensee has kind of accident from any accident previously and testing ensure that expected valve proposed to remove cycle-specific evaluated performance will remain as before. reactor physics parameters from the Increasing the bypass setpoint does not 2 Does the proposed llcansa amendment Cooper Nuclear Station Technical create the possibility of a new or different create the possibility of a new or different Specifications and incorporate them into kind of accident since the proposal Involves kind of accident from any accident previously neither a hardware modification nor the evaluated? a new document called the Core creation of a unique operating condition. Evoluotlon: Operating Limits Report. (5)Use of the mor lfied specification would The proposed change will not create the Basis for proposed no significant not Involve a significant reduction in a possibility of a new or different kind of hazards consideration determination:In margin of safety. • accident from any previously evaluated accordance with the requirements of 10 Increasing the ESF bypass setpoint does becauae the proposed change does not CFR 50,92,the licensee has submitted • not change the reaults of any of the FSAR introduce a hardware change.and the the following no significant hazards Chapter 14 events.Increasing the ESF bypass performance of the SVs and SRVs is not determination: setpoint does slightly expand the operating affected The valve setpoints will be returned .fMse the proposed IttRnse amendment space within which the ESA will be to within 2h1s of their nominal setting before involve 414A' inaeasa In the bypaimed.However,the revised bypass being returned to service w valor probability or consequences of m accident will.remain below the allowable performance w not affected The valve will previously evaluated? pressure for power operadoa continue to fulfill their design objective. The staff has revie ad the licensee's width is to Dravent overpreseunzation of die Evaluation: no significant hazards consideration nuclear system. The proposed amendment will remove 3.Does the proposed fit;enee amendment cycle epecdfe parameter limits from the determination analysis.Based upon this involve•efgelpunt reduction in the margin Technical Specifcadons and will reference review,the stab agrees with the of safety? their inclusion In a new controlled document licensee's no significant hazards Evaluation called the Core Operating Limits Report consideration.Based upon the above The proposed change will not involve a (OMR)•The removal C.these cycle-specific discusson.the staff proposes to significant reduction in•margin of safety limit,from the Technical Specifications has determine that the proposed change because the transient and accident no impact or influence on the occurrence of does not involve a significant hazards consequences will remain within the required an accident previously evaluated The plant consideration, acceptance criteria.The valve nominal will tonanue to operate within the limits wtpoints are not being changed and valve specified in the CO(R and will take the same ,Local Public Document Room performance is not affected The surveillance actions tf the limit,are exceeded as required location:Wlscasset Public Library.High by current plant Technical Specifications. requirements and testing ensure thst Street.P.O.Box 307,WiscasseL Maine expected valve performance will remain as The nundlaxs memdtememe for these limits 04578 before, remain unchanged.Technical Specification Attorney for licensee:John A.'Whet. Based on the previous discussion,the "'ill require that the limits be determined Esquire.Ropes and Cray,255 Franklin licensee concluded that the proposed tieing NRC approved methods and O Street.Boston.Massachusetts 02110 amendment request does not involve• 1°Do�(Trough mt:ate a of the eats to � the NEC.The tronslent,and accidents NRC Acting Project Director.Victor significant increase in the probability of analyzed in the Cooper Nuclear Station Names a new or different kind of accident from updated Safety Analysis Report will remain Nebraska Public Paws.District,Docket any accident previously evaluated:nor bounded.This proposed License Amendment Nuclear create the possibility of a new or was developed using the NRC guidance No.50~"90.Cooper Nuclear Station. Nemaha County. a different kind of accident from any contained in Generic Leter atilt The accident previously evaluated:nor proposed amendment does not involve a Dote of amendment request January involve a significant reduction in the significant increase in the probability or 28.1990 required margin of safety.The NRC staff C°rm°°q°°nces of an accident previously evaluated Description of amendment request: has reviewed the licensee's no 2 Doe■fife proposed license amendment The proposed change to the Technical significant hazards considerations create the possibility of a new or different Specifications would increase the determination and agrees with the kind of accident from any accident previously setpoint tolerance of the safety valves licensee's analysis.The staff has. evaluated? Fedora; Register / Vol. SS. No. 163 / Wednesday. August 22, 1990 / Notice! 34375 Evaluation: specific parameter limits for Nine Mile still be based on GECTAR IL which have The proposed amendment w01 pot alter point Unit Z(NMP2).License been previously approved by the NRC. any plant operstion.eafetreelatad equipment Amendment No.16 was{awed on jute The removal of specific design or safety familia Akhougb the proposed 19,1990,in response to this application. information does not result in a amendment wilt remove soma limits from License Amendment No.26 addressed reduction in the margin of safety aims Terhttiul Seedketkioa these limits will be all the changes pprov en required to be calculated using M C ng proposed by the licensee NRCa ed me are still reviewed and approved methods.Technical in their submittal of Afali XL IMO.with applied to reactor core design.Based on • Specifications will continue to require the exception of Technical Specification the above discussion.the staff proposes operation within the rem?ed core operating (TS)Sections 5.3.1 and 5.3.2.Design to determine that the proposed change limits and that aeon:Trineactions be taken if Features-Reactor Core,It was does not bivalve a significant hazards the limits are exceeded.The proposed determined that Sections 5.3.1 and 5.3.2 consideration. , amendment does not create any new added d would be the subject of a separate Local Public Document Room mode.The proposed amendment doe.not amendment.Proposed changes to create the posdbility of a new or different location: Reference and Documents kind of accident from any accident previously Section 5.3 are the embitter of this notice Department,Penfield Library.State evaluated. of proposed finding of no significant University of New York.Oswego.New 3.Does the proposed amekfinent involve a hazard determination.By the proposed York 13120. significant reduction in the ma:gin of safety? changes Sections 5.3.1 and 5.3.2 would Attontcy for licensee:Mark►. Evaluation be modified to delete details of fuel and Wetterhahn,Esq..Bishop,Cook.Purcell The Proposed aenendmeLt will still require control rod design which may change &Reynolds,1400 L Street,NAV.. operation within the limits derived from NRC with the loading of new approved Wash' approved methods and that appropriate Washington.DC 20005-�:+OZ actions are taken if the limits are exceeded. designs or different enrichments.The NRC Project Director Robert A. The proposed amendment does not alter any description of the fuel assemblies and Capra of the Safety Limits orLtmithtg Safety System control rod at,Tmbltee would then be a Settings as specified in the plant Technical more generic dincriPtton: Northeast Nuclear Energy Company,et Specifications not Oam:early plant Eosis for proposed nosignificant al,Docket No.50-334 Millstone\:+clear functions.The proposed amendment does not hazards consideration determination: Power Station.Unit Na 2,New London evolve a significant redaction to the margin The Commission has provided Cotmty.Ca®eetient of safety. standards for determining whether a Based on the previous discussion.the s gai5cant hazards consideration masts Date of amendment request:july 13, licensee concluded that the proposed as stated in 10 CFR 50.92 A proposed 1990 request: amendment request does not involve a amendment to an operating license for a D sort P ado.amenment wouldemeadarnt reque e significant rttcreasein the probability of facility involves i y significant hazards The proposed d change a new or different kind of accident from consideration if operation of the facility the Techh:nog Specifications related to • any accident previously e-reluated:nor in accordance with a proposed the Control Room Emergency create the possibility of a new or amendment would not(1)Involve Ventilation Systems.Specific*,the different kind of accident from any significant increase in the probability or proposed change adds as asterisk to the accident previously evaluated:nor consequences of an accident previously Modes 5 and section under the involve a significant reduction in the evaluated:or(2)Create the possibility of Limiting Condition For Operation(LCO) required margin of safety.The NRC staff a sew or different kind of accident from for Specification 3.7.6,1 ihat would has reviewed the licensees no any accident previously evaluated or(3) consider an emergency ventilation significant hazards considerations Involve a significant reduction in a system OPERABLE provided(I)its determination and agrees with the margin of safety, corresponding normal or emergency licansee s analysis.The staff has, The proposed amendment does not power source to OPERABLE and(2)all therefore,made a proposed involve a significant increase in the of its redundant system(s),snbsymem(s). determination that the licensee's request probability or consequences of an train(s),component(a)and device(s)are does not involve a significant hazards accident previously evaluated because OPERABLE or likewise satisfy the consideration, the replacement of the feel-type•apeeific requirements of the specification.Unless Local Public Document Room description of the fuel assemblies and both conditions(1)and(2)are satisfied location:Auburn Public Library,118 control rod assemblies by a more within 2 hours.then LCO 37.6.1.0 or 15th Street.Auburn Nebraska 68305 generic description does not change the 3.7,8.1.b would be invoked as applicable. Attorney for licensee:Mr.C.D. original safety analysis.The cote Basisfor meow;nosignificant Watson.Nebraska Public Power operating limits will still be based on the hazards consideration determination District,Post 0Mce Box 439,Columbus, NRC-approved methodology of CESTAR The licensee has reviewed the proposed Nebraska 68002.0499 II. change in accordance with 10 CFR 50.92 NRC.4cling Project Director: The proposed amendment does not and has concluded and tha staff agrees Theodore R.Quay create the possibility of anew or that it does not involve a significant Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation different kind of accident from any hazards consideration in that the change Darker No 50-x10.Nine Mile Point accident previously evaluated because it would not Docket Station.Lint!Nine i e Pointcribe.New involves no changes to system design 1.Involve a significant increase in the York basis or system function and does not Probability or conaequmwri of art*trident introduce any new variables beyond mrastoaebAsl••tsd 11an an no design Date of amendment muesli those previously considered, basis accidents that ars impacted by this November 9,1989.as superseded April The proposed amendment does not prepaid change to the Technical 10,1990 inv0{ve a significant reduction in a Specifications.This don not affect or hue Description of amendment ttegaeet• margin of safety because it does not basi types potential ooimam accidentsnsprevvioously,any of;a(�ed The licensee submitted an application involve any change in the safety Failure modes associated with this proposed dated November 9,1989.as superseded analysis or in plant procedures.The core change would not molt 10 an initiating event Apr1110,1900.to modify the Technical operating limits which are affected by that would result in s design bests accident Specifications which contain cycle- the fuel and control rod assemblies w81 and will not change or adversely impact the 34376 Federal Register / Vol. 55, No. 163 / Wednesday, August 22. 1990 / Notices probability of a failure of any safety systems. Attorney for licensee:Gerald Garfield. hazards consideration in that the The proposed modifications to the Technical !;squire.Day.Berry at Howard.City changes would not: Specifications will not change or adversely Place.Hanford.Connecticut 061033499. 1.Jnvolve a significant Increase in the impact the performance of any safety NRC Project Director:John F.Stolz probability or consequences of an accident systems.Providing for one(1)emergency previously analyzed. diesel generator inoperable during Modes S Northeast Nuclear Eaergy Company,et The proposed changes t0 Table 3.3-0 would and a without entering an action statement al"Docket No.SO-17J,Millatone Nuclear correctly realign the column headings to under Technical Specification 3.7.6.3 is Power Station,Unit No.3,New London reflect'Total No.of Channels"and consiatent with existing accommodation County,Connecticut "Minimum Channels Operable.'There are no • Invoked under Technical Specification 3.0.5 for(Control Room Emergency Ventilation Dote of amendment request July 10, other changes to Table 3.34.nor ate there Systems)In Modest,2,3 and 4,end with 1990 any changes in the way the plant 4 operated. existing Technical Specification 3.6.12 Description of amendment request: The proposed change is being made to ((Emergency Diesel Generator AC systems)! The proposed amendment would modify correct an administrative oversight that in Modes 5 and 6.This change would simply Millstone Unit 3 Technical Specification catered during preparation°few initial resolve inconsistencies between Technical (TS)Table 3 Mlllatone Unit No.3 Technical Specifications.The propose Specifications. .3.9."Remote Shutdown d ch■ to Table 4.34 will Instrumentati correct an editorial on".to corre rig° 2.Create the possibility of a new or more accurately reflect the aurveillanceRemote different kind of accident from any error and TS Table 4.3.6," requirements associated with the source reviously analyzed.This proposed Shutdown Monitoring Mstrumentati0n T Specification change does not Surveillance Requirements."to provide range count me instrument.Since the Technical S p rig instrument is only operable below the P4 modify the existing plant response such that a note of clarification concerning the interlock setpoint it Is inapprop iste to it can be considered■new accident.There source range Count rate. perform a eurvsillance on tt during power are no new credible failure modes associated Basis for proposed no significant operation.These proposed changes will have with this change.The results and effect*of hazards consideration determination: no negative impact on the probability of the change are consistent with those An editotal error has been identified In occurrence of any deafgn bade accident accidents already analyzed for.This change TS Table 3.3-9 which resulted in the There are no safety system'associated with clarifies and ensures consistency between column headings for"Readout these proposed changes,nor are any failure existing Technical Specification Location",Total No.of Channels"and modes affected by thews changes. requirements.No physical modifications to equipment or equipment operation would be 'Minimum.Channels Operable"being 2.Create the possibility of a new or made.All other surveillance requirements misaligned.The proposed change t0 TS different kind of accident from any and bases have remained unchanged. Table 3.3-9 would result in the eolunut previously analysed.The proposed changes 3.involve a significant reduction in the headings being correctly aligned-While to Tables 3.3-9 and 4.36 are considered an margin of safety.All design bases associated the licensee has identified only two improvement to the Millstone Unit No.3 with this proposed Technical Specification columns being effected,all three Technical Specifications. change have remained unchanged.The columns would be changed The changes to Table 3.34 will Correctly design basis for the(Control Room The proposed change to TS Table 4.3- realign the column headings for"Total No.of Emergency Ventilation Syeteme)is to 0 would add a clarifying note to the Channels"and"Minimum Channels maintain Control Room environment for 30 Operable."There are no other changes being surveillance requirementsfor source days continuous occupancy without made to this table. exceeding 5 Rem whole body dose per 10 range count rate channel check.At the The changes to Sable 4.34 will more C:FR 50.Appendix A-CDC 1n..(Control Room present time TS Table 4.3.0 specifies a accurately reflect the surveillance Emergency Ventilation Systems) monthly interval for the source range requirements for the source range count rate OPERABILITY in Modes 3,4,&and 6 I to count rate channel check.Since power nuclear instrument.Since this instrument is cope with a hypothetical release outside to the source range detectors is removed only operable when below the P4 interlock containment,particularly in the case of multi- in the intermediate neutron range setpoint(zero power).It is inappropriate to unit sites where the!Control Room (above the P-8 interlock)the source perform a surveillance on it during power Emergency Ventilation Systems)must be range detectors are effectively operation - Op1IItA8LE at all times.Allowing for one inoperable during power operation. Since there are no changes in the way the - emergency diesel generator inoperable Accordingly,a channel check of the plant is operated the potential for an without elating an action statement under source range count rate is meaningless unanalysed accident is not mated.No new Technical existing 3.7.6.11'consistent with the exieung accommodation invoked during power operation.The licensee failure modes are introduced. t:::dsr Technical specification 3.0.5 for hae proposed that the following footnote &Involve 4 significant reduction in• {C0MM!Room Emergency Ventilation be added to the source range count rate margin of safety.Since the proposed changes Systems]in Modes 1,2,3 and 4,and with channel check When below P-6 to Tables 3.311 and 4.34 do not affect the existing Technical Specification&6.1.2 in (intermediate range neutron flux consequences of any accident previously Modes 5 and e.Any system failure which interlock setpoint) analyzed,there is no reduction in the margin renders ono!Control Room Emergency The proposed footnote would have the of safety. Ventilation Systems]Inoperable(except effect of eliminating the requirement to The NRC staff has reviewed and emergency power source)will invoke the in,the licensee's determinations LCO under existing Technical Specification perform a channel check en the'puree COnCun !.7.6.1.Thetefine,no reduction in the margin range count rate when the reactor is regarding no significant hazards of safety would be considered to occur as a operating at power levels above the P-6 consideration associated with the July rctnit of the proposed change. interlock. 10.1990 application.Accordingly,the rased on the above,the staff proposes Title 10 CFR 50.92."Issuance of NRC staff has made a proposed t.determine that the proposed change Amendment"contains standards for determination that the proposed does not involve a significant hazards addressing the existence of no changes to the TS involve no significant consideration, significant hazards consideration with hazards consideration. Local Public Document Room regard to issuance of license Local Public Document Room Iccation:Learning Resources Center, amendments.In this regard,the liceneea location:Learning Resources Center, Thames Valley State Technical College, has stated that the proposed changes to Thames Valley State Technical College. 574 New London Turnpike,Norwich, the TS associated with the July 10.1990 374 New London Turnpike,Norwich. Connecticut 00300. application involve no significant Connecticut 06360. Federal Register / VoL SS, No. 183 / Wednesday, August 22. 1990 / Notices 34377 Attorney for licensee:Gerald Garfield. while subject to the requirements of an exception to Technical Speclt)cation 304.For Esquire,Day.Berry&Howard,City ACTION statement provided that example•under the revised 3.0A.Technical Place.Hartford Connecticut 08103-3499, conformance to the ACTION statement Specification 3.1.3.1 would allow start-up NRC Project Director.John P.Stolz permits continued operation for an=limited with one rod trlppable but inoperable for period of time. causes other than those Identified in ACTION Northeast Nuclear Energy Company,et b.Changes to Technical Specifications 4.0.3 (a)or misaligned from Its group step demand al„Dod tet No.50-421.Millstone Nuclear and 4.0,4 to allow 24 hours to complete a counter by more than 12 steps.The ACTION . Power Stadon,Unit No.3,New Landon missed aurvaillance prior to implementation statement requires that the required County.Connecticut when the associated ACTION requirements shutdown margin,insertion limits.etc,be when the allowable outage time greats of the met and power reduced to specified limits. Date of amendment request.July 17, ACTION requirements are less than 24 hours, However,shutdown is not required.Provided 1990 and to clarify that the requirement to that the reevaluadon of the affected ambient Description of amendment request complete surveillance prior to entry Woe analysts shown acceptable results for the The proposed amendment would change mode to which those moveWsetes are duration of operation under that condition. the Millstone Unit 3 Technical required to h•Performed shag not Prevent or indefinite continued Mode 1 operation la Specifications(TSs)based on the delay passage Into Iowan mode of operation Peed,Therefore,start-up wader this P es required to comply with ACTION condition would be permitted under this recommendations provided by the staff requirements. in Generic Letter(GL)87-09 related to Each of these groups of change■is rewind per sped deny o her Start-N would not the applicability of limiting conditions discussed in more detail below, be p°1'°U Hs'oy saner ACTION , for operations(LCO)and the The=vent Technical Specification 3.0.4 requirement of this one o of specification surveillance requirements of the TS 3.0 prohibits changing modes unless al)of the applicable.In fact, f t the male re•.ons he were revisand 4.0.Specifically,the licensee has LCOs applicable m that higher mode of chi the proposed subject t oe ts TI Wow mode y operation are met Certain Technical change when subject ro ACTION requested the following revisions to TS Pe muniments that do not impact continued Specifications.however•contain an 3.0.4,Specification 3 0 4 would be revised to exception to Technical Specification 9.0.4(for operation. ra��y thesis an� del of example,see Technical Specification 3.3.3.1. define when its provisions apply,Lt. Radiation Monitoring)that Wows etar•up safety without requiring•shutdown.and when the affected action statements with equipment or parameters that are not in allowing stert-up fa dais'ituation will have • permit continued operation for an compliance with the LCO.Shia exception is m adverse imPect on the coneegwntee of unlimited period of time,instead of that some equipment covered by the any accident defining when the provisions of Technical Specifications is not necessary to The proposed change to Technical Specification 34.4 do not apply. adequately midgets the design basis Spetifiatian4.0.3wouldWow.delayotup . to 24 Specification 4.0.3 would be revised to accidents.In Ness uses,not having the requirements hour to Implementing ACTION incorporate a 24-hour delay in equipment operable will obviously have no re �am•nu ha the event a required impact on the design heels.so it should not surveillance was not performed and the implementing Action Requirement due restrict start-up. allowable outage time limits of the ACTION to a missed surveillance when the The proposed revision to Technicalstatement ate less than 24 hours.The delay Action Requirements provide a Specification 10.4 would specifically allow would apply only m the event of•missed restoration time that is less than 24 entry into an operational mode while subject surveillance and would not apply to a failed hours. to ACTION requirements provided that those auresinance• - Specification 4.04 would be revised t0 ACTION requirements allow indefinite The purpose of the delay in implementing clarify that"Phis provision shall not continued operation.Thus,the exception to the ACTION requirements Is to allow■ prevent passage through or to specification 3.0.4 discussed above that is sufficient time to complete the required OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS as contained in numerous current Technical surveillance•recognising that a missed required to comply with Action Specifications(previously identified)is no surveillance Is much less significant than• P y failed ores.The vast majority of surveillances Requirements.' longer appropriate.Therefore,proposed fail performed criteria and ' hi addition to the above.a substantial changes that delete references W Technical D•� ttsDt•na Specifiadon 3AA are acceptable as they do relatively few surveillances show equipment number of Limiting Conditions for not change the intent of the Technical to be inoperable.Thus.it la highly likely that . Operation would be changed consistent specifications, a mined surveillance,had It been completed with the proposed changes to TS 3.0.4. . Some current Technical Specifications would have simply confirmed that the Basis for proposed no significant (Sections 3.3.3.5.3.4.4.3.4.9,3,and 3.0.4.1) component was operable.Assuming that hozards consideration determination: contain an exception to Technical equipment is inoperable merely because a Title 10 CFR 50.92,"Issuance of Specification 3.0A even though the ACTION sureeitlance has not been Performed la overly Amendment,"contains standards for statement requires a shutdown in•fixed conservative.Without the proposed 24-hour addressing the existence of no period of time.For example,Technical delay•missed surveillance would require significant hazards consideration with Specification 3.0.4.1,Hydrogen Monitors. N ACTION the applicable ACON remdrememta be regard to issuance of license h quire a shutdown within 72 hour if both immediately applied and that•shutdown be • hydrogen monitors are inoperable.However, initiated Requiring•change in plant amendments.In this regard the licensee Technical Specification 3.0.4.1 currently eandidona.even•controlled plant shutdown, has stated that the proposed changes to contains an exception to specification 3.0.4. has the Potential for resulting In•challenge the TS associated with the July 17.1990 and thus start-up is currently permitted while to the same equipment that the surveillance • application involve no significant subject to ACTION requirements.In these was not performed on and that was assumed hazards consideration in that the cases.specific wattling is proposed toallow to be inoperable.Oven that the majority of changes would not: startup even though the ACTION survelfiances performed do not identify 1.Involve a significant increase in the requirement does not permit indefinite equipment problem►,and given the potential probability or consequences of an accident continued operation.To these cases.the for causing challenges to other equipment by previously analyzed intent of the current Technics'Specification a forced shutdown.it is concluded that the To determine any potential impact.the is maintained and the proposed changes proposed 24-hour delay for implementing proposed changes can be grouped into two have no iranot ACTION requirements would have no impact general categories.These are: The last impact of the changes to Technical on equipment operability sad thus have no a.Changes to Technical Specification 30,4 Specification 3.0.4 would be on Individual Immo on the consequences of any accident and to the ACTION statements associated Technical Specifications with ACTION The proposed change to Technical with a number of LCOs to allow entry into an requirements which do not require shutdown, Specification 4.0.4 is essentially a operational mode or other specified condition but which do not currently contain an clarification of the existing Technical • 34378 Federal Register / Vol. 55. No. 183 / Wednesday. August 22, 1990 / Notices Specification.This change will have no Description of amendment request probability or consequences of■m accident impact on the Ooneequences of any accident The proposed amendment would change PreviousiY evelaated. The Proposed Changes will affect on1Y ths the Technical Specifications(TS)in Z Na The analysis described above can equipment required to be operable(defined only be evaluated for its effect oo the support of the ensuing cycle 6 reload. as fully meeting its LCO)for enoy into an Specifically the following TSB and Bases consequences of analyzed events:it cannot operational mode or the timing of actions to will be changed:3/4.21 Average Planar cue°t°new ones.The consequences of be taken in the event of a mimed linear chaat g e:3/4. .1 Rate:8 Pia analyzed„ooto were floated in 1.above. surveillance.The proposed changes do not / 3.No.As discussed in 1.above,the Impact the integrity of any component or the Minimum Critical Power Ratio:3/424 a nalysis to support the MAPLHGR limits at • reactor coolant pressure boundary,nor do linear Heat Generation Rete:3/4.4.1 higher exposures is consistent with they change the way in whicb surveitiaMe/ Recirculation System;B 21 bases for previously approved methods and meets all testing is performed.Therefore.the changes Safety Limits:B 3/421 bases for pertinent regulatory criteria for use in this cannot impact the probability of any design Average Planar Linear Heat Generation aPPlicatien-Therefore,the Proposed chalets • basis accident will not result in a significant decease in any 2 Create the possibility of a new or Rase;B 3/423 bases for Minimum margin of safety. different kind of accident from as Critical Power Ratio;B 3/4.4.1 bases for y Recirculation System;5.3.1 Fuel Specification Vag,Minimum previouslyomiof he proposed Critical Power Ratio Novas 3 the proposed changes to either Assemblies:and 3.3.2 Control Rod Section 3A or Section M of the Technical Assemblies. The changes to it CPRspec curves acedprov de on Specifications will haw any impact on plant Basis for proposed no significant new operating Omit MCPR curves based on eci response.The Proposed changes also Involve hazards consideration determination: cy flc transient analyses,1.No. Limiting cornwide transients were no changes to SW equipment or to either The Commission has provided evaluated with ANT"COTRANSA code(.) normal or emergency°pending procedures standards for determining whether a and this output was utilized by the XC.OBRA- Thus,no new failure modes will be significant hazards determination exists T methodology(...)to determine delta CPR& introduced In addltlo4 all of the equipment a sitated in 10 CFR 50.92(c).A proposed Both COTRANSA and XCOBRA•T have been effected by the change to d b the NRC f Technical Sprained=3.0.4 is either not amendment to an operating license approved in previous license required for mitigation of a design basis involves no significant hazards amendments.All con-wide transients were occident or the applicable Technical consideration if operation of the facility analyzed deterministically(i.e..using Specification ACTION statement provides au in accordance with theproposed b T o o al eve ts input p Withdrawal D Two local events.Rod Wfthdrawal Error equivalent level of safety.Thu,Plant amendment would not 1)involve a and Fuel Load ing Amor.were imalyted is mooned)omooned)will be unaffected significant increase is the probability or accordance with the methods described in N summary,NNECO concludes that the consequences of are accident previously )Ce-NP801P(A)Vol s(.4.This methodology proposed changes will not create the evaluated:2)create the possibility of a has been approved by the NRC. possibility of any naw•m different kind of new of different kind of accident from Based on the above.the methodology used accident from those previously analyzed, to develop the new operating Breit MClrlta for A Lfvalva•sigetfiant reduction in any any accident previously evaluated;or 3) the Technical Specifications does not involve margin of safety. involve s significant reduction in a a significant increase in the probability or As discussed above,none of the proposed margin of safety. consequences changes to either Section 3A evaluated. or Section an of The staff has reviewed the licensee's OL an accident previously the Technical Specifications will impact plant request and concurs with the following 2.No.The methodology described can only equipment.plant response.or any parameter basis and conclusion provided by the be evaluated for its dfect on the . related to the integrity of the reactor coolant licensee in its July 21996 submittal consequences of analyzed events:it cannot pressure boundary.Further the Proposed The following three questions are create new ones.The consequences of changes will not affect either normal or adamant)for each of the proposed Technical analyzed events were evaluated in 1.above. emergency operating procedures.Therefore. Speculation change► 3.No.As stated is 1.Above(...),the the proposed changes will not impact any 1.Does the proposed change involve a methodology used to evaluate core-wide and safety limit or reduce any margin of safety. significant increase to the probability or local transients is consistent with previously The NRC staff has reviewed.and consequences of as accident previously approved methods and meets all pertinent concurs in.the licensee's determinations evaluated? regulatory criteria for use In thin applkatlon. regarding no significant hazards 7.Pas the proposed change create the Based on the above,the use of the consideration associated with the July Possibility of a new or different kind of methodology utilized to produce the Ma 17.1990 application.Accordingly.the accident from any accident previously MCPR operating limits will mot remit in• NRC staff has made a proposed evaluated? significant decrease in any margin of safety. determination that the proposed 3.Does the proposed change involve■ Specification 3/424,Linear Heed changes to the TS involve no significant significant reduction in a margin of safety? Generation Rate hazards consideration. Specification 3/4.21.Average Planar Proposed changes to this specification Local Public Document Room Linear Hoot Generation Rate provide appropriate limits at extended location:Learning Resources Center, The changes to this specification are solely bumups for ANF axe fuel _ Thames Valley State Technical College. to Figure 327-1,which provides appropriate 1.No.ANY-O60ia(P).Revision 11—) eY MAP.HCR Benin to bound the exposure that supports the new maximum axe diecharge 574 New London Turnpike.Norwich, the ANF IOW fuel will experience during exposure.This report demonstrates that ConneCtCut oaaeo. Cycle 0 operation. margin to axe fuel mechanical design limits is , Attorney for licensee:Gerald Garfield, 1.No.The increased snowed expos=is assured for all anticipated operational Esquire,Day,Berry✓k Howard,City based on an additional MAPLHCR occurrences throughout the life of the fuel Place,Hartford Connecticut 06103-3499. evaluation performed by ANP(—J.This provided that the fuel rod power history NRC Project Director.John F.Stolz evaluation is consistent with previously remains within the power histories assumed approved methods,and ensures that the peak in the analyses. Pennsylvania Power and Light cladding temperature for the ANF rocs fuel Based Ott the above,the IliO3 LliCR Company.Docket No.60.387. remains below 770T F,local 7,r-H.0 reaction operating hints do not involve a significant Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, remains below 17%.and core-wide hydrogen Increase in the probability or consequences Unit 1.[Aherne County,Partnsy'wads production remains below zu for the limiting of an accident previously evaluated- LOCA event as required by 10 CFR 10.46. 2.No.This Change reflects appropriate Dote of amendment request:July 2. Therefore,the additional MAPWGR limits limits which ensure compliance with all 1090 do not involve a significant increase in the relevant fuel mechanical design criteria. Federal Register / Vol. 55, No. 163 / Wednesday. August ?2. 1990 / Notices 34379 Application of thew limits will not create the 1.No.Tha revised MCPR limit reacts the 3.No.Based on its slmllar operating possibility of•new or different event. result of ANF'■maniple of•recirculation characteristics,previously approved 7.No.As described in 1.above.ANF-90. pump Mira*accident on•generic basis for analyses,and the analyses and limits which 018(P)Revision 1 demonstrates appropriate the Susquehanna units[._(.Pest analyses of are proposed in this application.the WC6 safety margin to fuel mechanical design limits this accident utilized ANY•transient reload fuel will not result in•significant for all anticipated operational occurrences methodology to establish a delta CPR which decease in soy margin of safety. throughout the life of the fuel would preclude fuel failures due to Specification 5.3.2 Control Rod Specification 3/4.4.1,Recirculation overheating or clad atrain.The generic• Assemblies System(Try°Loop Operation) analysis performed for U1C6 and future SSES The changes to this specification are The changes to this specification(i.e.. cycles used SafetyLlrelt MCPR methodology provided in order to recognize the Figure 7.4.1.1.1.1)reflect cycle-specific to determine the extent of rods which might stability analysis. experience boiling transition should MCPR replacement blade design being introduced in 1.No.COTRAN core stability calculations reach 0.90.This accident methodology results U1Ce• were performed for Unit 1 Cycle 6 to in increased consequences(lase than 2%of 1.No.The main differences between the determine the decay ratios at predetermined the fuel rods were calculated to experience replacement Durant.tecC control blades and power/Bow conditions.The resulting decay boiling transition at the 95%confidence IeveL the original equipment control blades are: ratios(...)were used to dente operating and significantly fewer rods would be a.the Dural&16oc control blades utilize regions which comply with the interim expected to fall as opposed to none using the improved B.C tube material(i.e.,high purity requirements of NRC Bulletin No.6607. transient methods).Thia result however,is stainless steel vs.commercial purity stainless Supplement 1"Power Oscillations in Boiling not a significant incense in consequences steel)to eliminate cracking during the lifetime . Water Reactors;"[...I.As in the previous when compared to LOG results. of the control blade: cycle,Regions B and C of the NRC Bulletin Furthermore,it meets the regulatory b.the Duralife 1000 control blades utilize have been combined into a single region(Le, acceptance criteria for radiological three wild hafnium rods at each edge of the Region B),and Region A of the NRC bulletin consequences since they are but•small cruciform which replace the three B.C rods corresponds to Region L fraction of 10 CFR 100 guidelines,even with that are most susceptible to cracking to Region I has been defined such that the the conservative assumption that all rods increase control blade life: decay ratio for all allowable power/flow which experience boiling transition falL a the Duralife 1600 control blades contain conditions outside of the region is less than The typographical error is an Inadvertent additional B.C tubes in place of the stiffeners. 0.90.To mitigate or prevent the consequences omission of the"w”in the APRM Bow have an increased sheath thickness,utilize a of instability,entry into this region requires a biased trip setpoint This is an editorial full length weld to attach the handle and manual reactor scram,Region I for Unit 1 correction to•previously approved velocity limiter,and contain additional Cycle 6 has been aleulated to be slightly amendment no technical change is being coolant holes at the top and bottom of the larger than Region I for the previous cycle. proposed. sheath which result in a crevice-free Region B has been defined such that the Based on the above,the proposed changes structure: decay ratio for all allowable power/Bow do not involve•significant increase in the d.the Duralife 1600 control blades utilize conditions outside of the region(excluding probability or consequences of an accident low cobalt-bearing pin and roller materials in Region I)is less than 0.77.For Unit 1 Cycle 0. previously evaluated. plea of stellite which was previously • Region B must be immediately exited if it is 2 No.The analysis which supports the SLO utilized: inadvertently entered.Similar to Region L a MCPR limit revision n only be evaluated a.the Duralife 1800 control blades are R• egion B is slightly larger than in the for its effect on the consequences of analyzed previous cycle, events:it cannot create new ones.The low by approximately 7.1 inches in order to In addition to the region definitions.PPBL consequences of anal yrad events were facilitate fuel moves within the reactor vessel has performed stability tests in SSES Unit 2 evaluated in 1.above.The typographical during refueling outages at Susquehanna SES: during initial startup of Cycles 2 and 7 to correction is purely administrative In nature. and demonstrate stable reactor operation with 3.No.See 1.above.The analysis used tof.the Duralife 1660 control blades are • ANF 9x9 fuel The test results for U2C2[...I determine the revised SLO MCPR limit meets approximately 16 pounds heavier as a result show very low decay ratios with a core all pertinent regulatory raquiromests for use of the design changes described above. containing 724 ANF 0x9 fuel assemblies. The Duralife control blade has been in Nis application.and concluded that the Figure 7/4.1.1.1-1 is also referenced by consequences ware but•small fraction of 10 °valuated to assure it has Idequsts structural Specification 7/4.4.1.1.1 which governs Single margin under loading due to handling.and Loop Operation(SLO).The evaluation above CPR 100 gWdelines normal emergency,and faulted operating under SLO conditions as welt The typographical correction b purely modes.The loads evaluated include Chow Based on the shove.operation within the administrative to mature. due to normal operating transients(scram limits specified by the proposed changes will Based on the•hove the proposed changes and)oggingL pressure differentials,thermal ensure that the probability and consequences will not result In•significant decrease In any margin of safety. gradients,seismic deflection.irradiation of unstable operation will not significantly Specification 5.3.1.Fuel Assemblies growth.and any other lateral and veetverticalincrease. 1 No.The methodology described above The proposed changes to this section delete loads expected for each condition The can only be evaluated for its'Mkt on the unnecessary references to the initial core Duralife leoC control blade stresses.strains, consequences of unstable operation:it cannot loading. and cumulative fatigue have been evaluated - create new events.The consequences were 1.No.References to the initial core loading and result in an acceptable margin to safety. evaluated in 1,above. which has been completely discharged are The control blade thermion apebiiity hue 7.No.PP6L believes that the use of unnecessary and proposed to be deleted The been evaluated and it has been determined to Technical Specifications that amply with ANFd Oxp fuel has similar thermal hydraulic be capable of insertion into the core during • • NRC Bulletin 6607 Supplement 1.and the and nuclear operating characteristics to the all modes of plant operation within the limits tees and analyses described above,will ANF4 one design which ha■been previously of plant analyses The Duralife 160C control provide assurance that SSES Unit 1 Cycle 6 approved by the NRC[...I for coreeidence blade coupling mechanism is equivalent to will comply with General Design Criteria 11 with the AM 6x6 fuel that will remain in the the original equipment coupling mechanism Suppression of Reactor Power Oscillations. core.Therefore,the proposed changes do not and Is fully compatible with the existing This approach is consistent with the%ES involve■■i nitlant increase in the control rod drives in the plant In addition. Unit 1 Cycle 6 method for addressing core probability or consequences of an accident material selected is compatible with the stability[--1• previously evaluated reactor environment.The impact of the Specification 3/4.4.1.Recirculation 2.No.As described above.the ANT 9x9 increased weight of the control blades on the System/Single Loop Operation) fuel has been previously evaluated for seismic and hydrodynamic load evaluation of The changes to this specification include• coresidence with ANF 6x13 fuel in the are. the reactor vessel and internals bas been revised MCPR limit and correction of■ No new events have been determined to reviewed and found to have•negligible typographical error. result from this change. effect on existing analyses 34380 Federal Register / Vol. 55, No. 183 / Wednesday. August 22. 1990 / Notices With the exception of the crevice-free commercial purity stainless steel),boron loss been approved by the NRC for the structure and the extended handle,the due to cracking is not expected PP3L plans public Service Electric and Cas(PSEBC) Duralife 1800 control blades are equivalent to track the depletion of each control blade Company facilities.There are two key to the NRC approved Hybrid I Control Blade and discharge any control blade prior to■ter areas of importance under the SQR Assembly(...J.The mechanical aspects of the percent loss in reactivity worth Therefore, crevice-free structure were approved by the the requirements of!E Bulletin 79.20. Program.(em dash)Tha Plant Operations NRC for all control blade designs in(...).A Rev4lon 1 do not apply to the Durelife IeoG Review Committee(PORC)will no reutronics evaluation of the crevice-free control blades. longer be required to render a structure for the Duralife 100C design was Based on the discussion above.the new determination as to whether or not a • performed by CE using the same control blades proposed to be utilized In new program.procedure,or change methodology as was used for the Hybrid 1 0103 do not Involve■significant Increase in thereto constitutes an unreviewed safety control blades in l...i.These calculations the probability or consequences of an question(USQ)in accordance with 70 were performed Ent the original equipment accident previously evaluated CFR 50,30.(em dash)PORC will no control blades and the Duralife MCC control 2.No.The replacement blades can only be blades described above assuming an array of evaluated for their effectiveness as part of longer be required to review and ANF 9x9 fuel.The Curalife 1600 control the overall reactivity control system.which is recommend approval/disapproval of blade has a slightly higher worth than the evaluated in terms of analysis consequences new programs or program changes and original equipment design.but the increase in in 1.above.Since they do not cause any certain types of procedures or procedure worth is within the criterion for nuclear significant change in Priem operation or Changes t0 the Plant Manager. Interchangeability.The increase in blade function,no new events are created. The responsibility and authority to worth has been taken into account in the 3.No.The analyses described in 1.above pOrfoR111hCse funCtiOns will b8 appropriate 111Ce analyses.However,as indicate that the replacement blades meet all P e tarn. d se responsible stated in(.4.the current practice In the pertinent regulatory criteria for use in this D lattice physica methods is to model the applICtition,and are expected to eliminate the Superintendents designated by the Plant original equipment all 34 Control blades as boron loss contents expressed In IE Bulletin Manager. non-depleted.The effects of control blade 70-28,Revision 1.Therefore,the proposed Implementing the SQR Program at the depletion on core neutronics during a cycle change does not result in a efgnificamt Limerick Generating Station(LCS). are small and are inherently taken into decrease in any margin of safety. Units 1 and 2,will involve the proposed account by the generation of a target k- The staff has reviewed the licensee's TS changes described below. effective for each cycle.As discussed above. submittal and significant hazards 1.Revise I'S Section 0.5.1.0.a to read the neutronics calculations of the crevice-free analysis and concurs with the licensees ••Review of(1)Administrative structure show that the non-depleted Duralife determination es to whether the Procedures and changes thereto,(2)new te0C control blade has direct nuclear proposed amendment involves a interchangeability with the non-depleted significant hazards consideration. programs or procedures required by original equipment all 8.G designs.The Therefore the staff proposes to Specification 6.8 and requiring a 10 CFR Duralife teoC also has the same end-of-life 50.50 safety evaluation,and(3)proposed reactivity worth reduction limit as the all Bee determine that the proposed amendment changes to programs or procedures deaf Therefore,the Durallfa 1800 can be involves no significant hazards used without changing the current lattice consideration. required by Specification 6 U and g g Local Public Document Room requiring a 10 CFR SO S9 safety physics models as previously appmved for evaluation:"to indicate the reduction in the Hybrid I control blades l...). location:Oeterhout Free Library. The extended handle and the crevice•free Reference Department 71 South the scope of PORCs program/ structure features of the Duralife 1800 control Franklin Street Wilkes-Barte. procedural review. blades result in a one pound increase in the Pennsylvania 18701. 2 Revise TS Section 6.5.1.6.e to read control blade weight over that of the Hybrid 1 Attorney for licensee:Jay Silberg, "DELETED.'The new provisions added blades,and s sixteen pound increase over the Esquire,Shaw,Pittman,Potts,and under item 4 below will require PORC to Susquehanna SFS original equipment control Trowbridge.2300 N Street N.W. review 10 CFR 50.58 safety evaluations blades.In(...I.the NRC approved the Hybrid I Washington,DC 20037. for those new procedures and changes control blade which weight less(by more NRC Project Director:Walter R to existing procedures for which a 10 than one pound)titan the D lattice control CFR 30 59 •safe evaluation isprepared - blade.The basis of the Control Rod Drop Butler. safety as part of the overall new procedure or Accident amity'',continues to be Philadelphia Electric Company,Docket procedure thane package, conservative with reaped to control rod drop Nos,50.332.and SO.53 Limed& speed since the Duralife 1000 carrel blade Therefore,theGenerating Station,Units 1 and Z to review 10 CFR 50.59 safer for PORC weighs lea than the D lattice control blade. Montgomery Coup Pennsylvania safety and the heavier D lattice control blade @peed r'Y ty. Y evaluations associated with procedures is used in the analysis.In addition.GE Dote of amendment request July 13, and changes thereto can be deleted. performed scram time analyses and 1990 3.Change the reference to TS Section determined that the Durable 1e0C control Description of omendmentrequest: "0.5.1.6a"under TS Section 6.5.1.7b to blade scram times are not significantly The amendments would change the read"e.b.1.0b"to indicate that PORC different than the original equipment control Administratve Controls section(Section will no longer be responsible for blade scram times.The current Susquehanna SFS measured scram times also have 6.0)of the Technical Specifications(TS). rendering determinations in writing with considerable margin to the Technical including the addition of a new TS regard to whether or not new programs. Specification limits.Since the increase in Section 0.3.3.to reflect the procedures.or changes thereto weight or the durable in0C control blades implementation of a Station Qualified constitute an unreviewed safety does not significantly increase the measured Reviewer(SQR)Program for review and question.The responsiblity and scram speeds and the safety analyses which approval of new station programs. authority for this function is transferred involve reactor scrams utilize the Technical procedures,end changes thereto.The to the responsible Superintendent under Specification Relit ecram times,the safety SQR program is a program/procedural the SQR program. analysts are not a![ected review and approval process using 4.Add new TS section 6.5.3 to specify Since the Duralife 180C control blades contain solid hafnium rods in locations were qualified reviewers to perform a review the basic requirements of the SQR the B,C tubes have failed,and the remaining and designated Superintendents for program. B.C rods are manufactured with an improved approval of new programs,procedures. Basis for proposed no significant tubing material(high purity stainless steel vs, and changes thereto.This program has hazards consideration determination: Federal Register / Vol. 55. No. 183 / Wednesday. August 22, 1980 / Notices 34,981 • The Commission has provided changes thereto to which an unreviewed affect the following valve numbers:PSV- standards for determining whether a safety question determination(le.10 CFR =x1,2231.225L 2271,2212 2232.2252. significant hoards determination exists 50:°°f°tY evaluation) a required to be 2272 caopomad as stated in 10 CPR 50.92(c).A proposed adm°n ea.As cha• nges wilt as decrease the Beals for proposed no significant amendment to an operating license safety oversight function which PORC hazards consideration determination: involves no significant hazards performs.She proposed chariot do not The Commission has provided consideration if operation of the facility involve any physical alterations of plant standards for determining whether a • in accordance with the proposed configuration.changes to setpoints.or significant hazards consideration exists amendment would not I)involve a operating parameters,nor do they involve as stated in 10 CFR 50.92(c).A proposed significant increase is the probability or any potential initiating events that would amendment to an operating license for a consequences of an accident previously create the possibility of a new or different facility involves no cant hazards evaluated 2)create the possibility of a kind of accident from ery accident previously consideration if s lion of the facility new or different kind of accident from °valuated' 3.The proposed changes do not Involve a in aeeordance with the Punned any accident previously evaluated or 3) eleeihteet mdecttee in a manse of safety, amendment would not(1)imroive s involve a significant reduction in a The proposed changes are administrative in significant increase in the probability or margin of safety nature and hwOl Ve only the transfer of consequences Of an accident previously The licensee has provided an analysis responsibilities and authority for • evaluated or(2)create the posaibility of of no signlirant hazards considerations program/Procedural review and approval to s Dew or different kind of accident from with the request for the license responsible Superintendent&PORC will any accident previously evaluated or(3) amendment The licensee's analysis of continue to review and the Plant Manager y continua to involve a significant reduction in a wiLL conti the proposed amendment against the approve those new programs. ma of safetY• three standards in 30 CPR 50.92 is procedures.and changes thereto for which en martin reproduced below unreviawed safety question determination The licensee has evaluated the 1.The proposed changes do not involves (i.e..10 CFR 50.59 safety evaluation)is proposed amendment against the required to be performed.AeeordlnglY,the sigracent increase In the probability or same management level of review sad standards of 10 CFR 50.92 and bas consequences of an accident previously determined the following approval of new program&procedures,and evaluated. the es thereto as currently required by TS is 1.Thin change der no involve a The proposed changes are adroinietrativa maintained That 4 Na responsible increase ho the probability of changes which implement a program/ co Superintendents era slue PORC membare, mequencae of an accident previously procedural resew and approval process Therefore.the margin of safety ianot reduced evaluated. through the nee of qualified personnel designated by the PORC Chairman for review The proposed chintzes do not impact plant The orifice area for the atom lino safety purposes and Superintendents designated by [systems or operations alai therefore,do not valves was incorrectly listed In'ITS Table the Plant Manager,es authorized try involve a significant reduction in a margin of 4.74.The proposed change incorporate*the Administrative Procedure&for approval of safety. correct orifice area and establishes specific types of programs and daises of The staff has reviewed the licensee's • FS AR. cy between the installed valves.the FS ' procedure&The SQR will be required to submittal and significant bastards ��''M ITS. consider.document,and implement a cross- The 12174 square inch(sq.in.)orifice area - analysis and conan'with the licensees disciplinary review prior to approval if was Dead to calculate valve capacities used , necessary.The program will be controlled by determiaatioa as to whether the In the ufety analysis.A formals certified by Administrative Procedures which will proposed amendment involves a the National Board of Boiler and Pressure continue to be reviewed by PORC and significant hazards consideration. Vessel Inspectors.Section m.was wed in approved by the Plant Manager.PORC will Therefore,the staff proposes t0 these alnalation This orifice area was also continue to review Nor new programs, determine that the proposed amendment used is test methods for alculattes lift procedures.and changes thereto foe which an involves no significant hazards ■etpoints.The valve manufacturer his =reviewed safety question deterrolnetien conalde'tion verified the 12174 sq.In.orifice area and test (i.e..10 CFR 5030 safety evaluation)is methods b°kf used a»correct Thus 0s required to be performed.As a result the Local Public Document Room proposed change le editorial in nature and proposed administrative chump wW not focal/cm:Pottstown Public Library,SOD has not changed the probability or decrease the safety oversight function which High Street Pottstown,Pennsylvania consequences of an accident. PORC perform&The proposed cbariges wID 19,104. 1 This lunge does not auto the add more detailed requirements regarding Attorney for&onsee:Conner and possibility of•new Or different kind of program/procedure review and approval to accident from any accident previously the TS which will strengthen the controls Wetterhahn.1747 Pennsylvania Avenue. evaluated over this process.The proposed changes do N.W..Washington.DC 2000e. As discussed above.the proposed change not a3ect any plant hardware.plant dna* , NRC Project Director.Walter R. is editorial in nature and has no effect on the limiting'peaty system settings,or plant Butler accident analysis. • systems,and thertent.do not modify or add 3.114 change dose not Involve a any initiating parameters that would cause a Portland General Electric Company et significant reduction in•margin of safety. significant increase in the probability or al.,Docket No.50-344. l Nueleer As discussed above,the proposed change consequences of any accident previously Power Plant.Columbia County,Oregon is editorial in nature and baa no effect on the evaluated accident analyaiw No Chang"are Pit"ed 2.The proposed changes do not create the Date of amendment request.Jnna 12, to the 77S requirements that all mein steam possibility of a new or different kind of 1989 Uni wed°safety valves undated with each accident from any accident previously Description of amendment request: steam generator be operable in Modest 2. evaluated. The proposed amendment would'wise and i nor to the smvsillanoo requirements The proposed change will Implement a Tro)an Technical Specifications(ITS) that operability b■(with lift settings as program/procedural review and approval Table 4.7-1."Steam Line Safety valves specified)routinely demonstrated procese and are adminstrative in nature.The per Loop.'The amendment would The staff has reviewed the licensee's program will be which will lledcon in a to be Administrative replace incorrect values of valve orifice no significant hazards consideration ProceduresedbyPORC approved sizes 4.11.05 inches with the determination reviewed by PORC tied approved by the (Q square ) analysis.Based upon this Plant Manager.PORC will Continua to review actual orifice sixes(Q=12.174 square review.the staff agrees with the those new programs.proeedures.and inches).The proposed change would licensee's analysis.Mendota.based 30.382 Federal Register / Vol. 55. No. 183 / Wednesday, August 22, 1990 / Notices upon the above discussion the staff evaluated Further,the AFW system serves to Nuclear Plant(SQN),Units 1 and 2, proposes to determine that the proposed mitigate the consequences of an acddent Technical Specifications(LSe).The change does not involve a significant and thus,it's operation is not relevant to proposed changes are to revise the accident probability. hazards consideration. Action Statement"c"for Limiting Local Public Document Room The Tt 5 Change proposed is Condition for ration Location:Branford Price Millar Libra administrenve,ry that a revises the TTS to Operation(LCO)3.9.2 on say. coma identify the valves currently source range neutron flux monitors for Portland State University.934 S.W. installed refueling operations.This action Harrison.Street P.O.Box 1151,Portland 2.This change does not Crests the statement would be revised to add a Oregon 97207. possibility of■new or different kind of statement that the requirements of TS Attorney for licensee:Leonard A. accident from any accident previously 3.0.4 are not applicable to LCO 392 TS Girard.Esq.,Portland Cenral Electric evaluated. 3.0'4 states that the licensee may not • Company.=S.W.Salmon Street char e discs l administrative.ueeed above.bove.the d he proposed d effect TTS ect on have the reactor enter an operational Portland.Oregon 97204 'gan as e mode or other specified condition unless NRC Project Director.John T.Larkins, the accident analysts the conditions for the LCO are met Acting 3.This change does not involve a significant reduction In a margin of safety. without reliance on provisions Portland General Electric Company et The design change to replace the motor contained in the action requirements. el..DOeket No.50-344,Trojan Nuclear operators with ale operators was done to This provision does not prevent passage Power Plant Columbia County,Oregon improve APW system operation.and through operational modes as required therefore.the margin of safety is not reduced to comply with settee requirements. Date of amendment request'July 19, The proposed change comets the 1989 identification of valves which have alreadyExceptions t0 the requirement in TS Description of amendment request' been incorporated into the design.and a 3.0.4 are stated in the individual The proposed amendment would revise such.it's.),administrative change with no epeeiflcede"The licensee is proposing Trojan Technical Specification(TTS) effect on safety margin. such an exception for LCO 392 to allow Table 3.&1.The change,which affects in the Match 0.mg postal Resister(51 the reactor to enter the refueling the four valves of the male steam supply FR 7750),the NRC published a list of operational mode without meeting LCO to the r valvesttry f the main rmr examples of license amendments that are not 3.9.2(i.e..without having as a minimum (�'�p P likely to Involve•significant hazards two operable source range monitors). turbine,would change the description of consideration.Example 0)from this het Refueling is Operational Mode 6 with the turbine steam supply valves from states: fuel in the reactor vessel and the reactor motor-operated to air-operated. A purely administrative change to vessel head closure an bolts lees than full Basis for proposed no significant Tacbnreal Specifications e.g..•change to y hazards consideration determination: achieve■consistency throughout the tensioned or the head removed, . The Commission has provided Technical Specifications correction of an Basis for proposed no significant standards for determining whether a ear•or a change in nomenclature. hazards consideration determination: significant hazards consideration exists The proposed change corrects the The licensee provided the following as stated in 10 CFR 50.92(c).A proposed identification of the turbinedrtven AFW information on its proposed changes to amendment to ea operating license for PumPD team supply valves aad is glair�W the TSs: ape Ling Example i dletwsed alxrve During the current Unit 1 Cycle 4 refueling facility involves no significant hazards the proposed change does not involve■ outage,it was noted that LCO 3.0.2 unduly consideration if operation of the facility significant hazards conslderanoa restricted entry into Mods a with less than in accordance with the yroposed The staff has reviewed the licensee's two source.range nuclear matrament■tato amendment would not(I)involve a no significant hazards Consideration Channels operable.The reetriction on Mode 0 significant increase in the probability or determination analysis.Based upon this entry is overly restrictive because LCO 3.92 consequences of an accident previously review,the staff agrees with the contains action provisions that addreu evaluated:or(2)create the possibility of licensee's analysis.Therefore,based inoperable source-range channels.and these a new or different kind of accident from upon the above discussion the staff action provisions do not hmrt the amount of any accident previously evaluated:or(3) proposes to determine that the proposed tho�°that e.Thew anga channel maynto mode bar involve a significant reduction in a change does not involve s significant while nh relying onthe action awry rovi Mode e. margin of safety hazards consideration. while able s ur tea ng provisions would for The licensee has evaluated the LocoI Public Document Room inoperable an acceptable gar ch of annels. proposed amendment against the Location:Branford Price Millar Library, provide letter ddat�ed�Maarrch level 199900.`S quoyah standards of 10 CFR 50.92,and has Portland State University.934 S.W. Nuclear Plant(SQN)-Request fa determined the following: Harrison Street P.O.Box 1151.Portland Discretionary Raton:cent for Unit 2 Limiting 1.This change does not involve a Oregon 97707. ... Condition for Maranon(LCO)LOA as significant increase in the probability or Attorney for licensee:Leonard A. Applied to LfA 7Ai"TVA dom®ented a consequences of an accident previously Girard,Esq.,Portland General Electric request for a temporary exemption to TS 3.0.4 evaluated The de ign change nom motor- Company. S.W.Salmon Street as it applies to LCO 3.92 for Unit L NRC operated to aireperated valves improves the � ��Oregon 97204. documented their approval of this action by AFW ayetem design by making the valve's 1e80 letter dated Much 27,1960,"Regional operation independent of alternating current NRC Project Director.John T.Larkins. Waiver of compliance.Inoperehie Source power.The change la consistent with NRC Acting Range Moulton(TAC 76300)-Seeuoyah guidance provided in Standard Review Plan Temassea Valley AuthOdty,Docket Nuclear Plant Unit];This TS change serves s QJUREG-wool.Section 10.4.9.In addition,the Nos.SO-J27 and IR1+17a.Sa9uoYah to permanently exempt the provisions of TS NRC provided approval of this design change 30.4 from LCO 3.9.21,1 removing the in their Safety Evaluation Report Nuclear Plant,Units land 2,Hamilton restrictions of Mode 0 entry with less than "Implementation of Recommendations for County,Tennessee two operable sc arse range channel, AuxLLlaty Foadwatu Systems"dated October Dare of amendment requests:July 20. The Commission has provided 2.7,7960.The valve's function to 1990 90 standards ford whether a - automatically open to admit ammo to the .15) � tubine.drlven AFW pump remains the same; Description of amendment requests: significant hazards consideration exists so therefore,accident consequences have not The Tennessee Valley Authority(TVA) u stated In 10 CFR 5092(0).10 CFR increased over accidents previously proposed to modify the Sequoyah 50.91 requires that at the time a licensee Fedenf Register / VOL 53, No. 183 / Wednesday. August 22. 1990 / Notices 34383 requests an amendment it must provide adequate tervels of safety being hazards considerations using the to the Commission its analyser,using maintained do not mean there is not a Commission's standard,. the standards in Section 50,92.on the significant reduction in safety,the Toledo Edison ham reviewed the proposed issue Of no significant hazards proposed amendments are viewed as changes and determined that■significant consideration.Therefore.in accordance having no safety significance because hazards consideration does not exist because with 10 CFR 50.91 and 10 CFR 50.92,the the action statements for inoperable operation of the Davleilesae Nuclear Power licensee has performed and provided the source r monitors for LCO 39.2 will Suatioa Chit No.1.in accordance with these anes wawa: following analysis: be mmPhad with in Mode 8 as required. rh1.not involve a significant increase:n the TVA nee evaluated the proposed technical There is no change to any requirements probability or consequences of an accident specification(TS)change and has determined in the Mg Other than allowing the previously evaluated because the seismic that it does not represent s significant reactor to enter Mode 0 with inoperable instrumentation and trigger have no effect on • hazards consideration based on criteria source range monitors.Therefore,the the tradition of an accident or seismic event. established In 10 CFR 3492(4 Operation of staff The reposes to determine that the The proposed locations and ranges will still Sequoyah Nuclear Plant(SQN)in aea u rdan with the proposed amendments will not application for amendments involves no ensure the information collected is proper O)Involve a significant Increase in the significant hazards considerations. and meaningful for determining the effect of a probability or consequences of an accident Local Public Document Room seiamic event on structures and components previously evaluated. locotiom Cbattenooga-Hamilton County important m safety. or me proposed change to Limiting Condition Library.1101 Broad Street,Chattanooga. 2.not create the acciposdent bee of a new ei for Operation(LCO)3.9.21s administrative to Tennessee 37402. different tatsype of a d trigg because the seismic nature.The change does not alter the actions instrumentation end trigger provide no required in the event of Mcperable source- Attorney Tennessee crewel accident Initiationsignificant mecnnnired CormeeL Tennessee Valley Authority. 3.not involve signitiant reduction in e range nuclear Instnunertation channels.The 400 West Suramit HID Drive,Ell B33, margin of safety because the proposed change simply allows reactor pressure vessel Knoxville.Tennessee 37902, locations and ranges remain consistent with head detelyins ills th and removal whits AEC Project Director:Frederick the recommendation of Regulatory Guide 1.12 complying a ac these action provolone. / J. Pecewe the actions currently allow Hebdoa as stated in the Batas 3/4g Technical continued operation for an indefinite period Toledo Edison Company and The Specification Basis�!4 3a.3 of time and these action requirements are not Claveloid ante Wmoinatins Eased on the previous discussions.the revised,the probability or consequences of licensee concluded that the proposed previously evaluated accidents are not Company.Docket No.30446,Davis. amendment request does not involve a increased by the proposed changes.TS 3.9.1 Bores Nutter Power Station,Unit No.1, significant increase in the probability or ' (on the boron concentration in the reactor Ottawa County,Ohio consequences of an accident previously coolant during refueling operations)provides Date of amendment request:i k.21. evaluated:dors not create the the necessary controls to enema an adequate 19&B possibility of a new of different kind of • eatery(shutdown)margin for dMensionfng Description of amendment request: ccident from an accident previously and removal of the reactor pressure vessel , y p y head. The proposed amendment would 1) evaluated:and does not involve a • (2)Create the possibility of anew or reflect the actual and appropriate reduction in the requited margin of different kind of accident from any configuration M the station site strong safety. previously analyzed. motion Mandel accelerometer and the The staff has reviewed the licensee's The proposed change to LCO 3.9.1 Is shield building peak recording no significant hazards consideration administrative in nature.The change does not accelerometer and 2)revise the determination and egress with the alter the actions required to the event of measurement(frequency)range of the licensee's analysis.The staff,therefore, inoperable source-range nuclear stations sites motion triaxial ty instrumentation channels.The changes �� proposes to determine that the licensee's simply allow entry into Mode a while accelerometer seismic trigger. request does not involve a significant complying with these eCtion provisions. The proposed changes involve hazards consideration. Barnum the BMWS currently allow Techniad•Specificad on 3.3.3.3 Table 3.3- Local Public Document Room continued operation for an indefinite period 7,"Seismic Monitoring location:University of Toledo Library. of time and these action requirements are not Instrumentation;and Table 4.3.4. Documents Department.2901 Bancroft revised the possibility of new or different "Seismic Monitoring Ininamentation accidents from those previously analysed is Surveillance Requirements". Avenue.Toled o.Obio 43006. not created by the proposed changes Attorney for licensee:Gerald Basis far no significant (3)L•tvolve it sigtlfflraat reduction to a hazards consideration determinotion: Charlie.Esquire.Shaw.Pittman.Potts margin of safety. 13e Commission has provided Washington,Trowbridge,2300 N Street.NW, The proposed change to l.CO 3A3 is The for determining whether a Washington.DC 20037. administrative in nature.The action ining . provisions for this LCO currently does not significant hazard*consideration exists NEC Project Director.John N.Hannon limit the dme that source-range nuclear as stated in 10 CFR 50.92.A proposed Toledo Edison COmpamy and The inetnunentation channels may be.Inoperable. amendment to an operating license for a Clmi ed Elea )C mem(nating It Is therefore concluded that corrrplianCe facility involves no significant hazards Company,Dodnt No.50.348.Davie. , with these action prwtsforr,coupled with consideration if operation of the facility Besse Nuclear Power Station,Unit No.1, the requirements of TS 3.9.1.provides an in accordance with a proposed Ottawa County.Ohio acceptable level of safety.Beattie adequate amendment would not(1)involve a ty levels of safety are maintained entry IMO Mode a while complying with the assodsted eig:nifinent Intaease in the Probability or Date of amendment request August 1, action provisions will not reduce the margin consequences of an accident peeVi0usly 1986 of safety. evaluated.(2)create the possibility of• Description of amendment request The staff has reviewed the licensees new or different kind of accident from The proposed amendment would clarify no significant hazards consideration any accident previously evaluated,or(3) the testing taquirements and update the determination and agrees with the involve•significant reduction in a regulatory and industry guidance licensee's analysis that the proposed margin of safety. references for High Efficiency amendments do not include■significant The licensee has provided the Particulate Air(HEPA)filters and hazards cotstderadon.Although following analysis of no significant charcoal adsorber units in Engineered 34384 Federal Register / Vol. 55. No. 163 / Wednesday. August 22, 1990 / Notices Safety Feature(ESP)cleanup systems. reduction.in the required margin of hazards eonsidersdons wing the The proposed changes involve Section safety. Commission's standards. 4.8.4.4,Hydrogen Purge System;Section The staff has reviewed the licensee's Toledo Edison bas reviewed the proposed 4.8.5.1.Emergency Ventilation System: no significant hazards consideration changes sad determined that a significant and Section 4.7.8.1,Control Room determination and agrees with the hazards consideration does not mdet because Emergency Ventilation System. licensee's analysis.noting that these operation of the Dsvl►Besse Nuclear Power Basis for proposed no significant changes do not reduce the acceptance Station Unit No.1,in accerdance with these hazards consideration determination: criteria or frequency of tests associated changes would: The Commission has provided with the HEPA filters and charcoal 1.not involve a significant Increase In the standards for determining whether a adsorber units in the ESP atmosphere probability or consequences of an setldeht significant hazards consideration exists cleanup system The staff,therein'''. previously evaluated because the Proposed as stated in 10 CFR 50.92.A proposed proposes to determine that the licensee's changes are admiabtntlw m ratan and amendment to an operating license fora request does not involve a significant prise for consistency a between plant . facility involves no significant hazards hazards consideration. configuration.tlon tasting Central and license consideration if operation of the facility Local Public Document Room Switches M�The Cpedy Rod Position which in accordance with aproposed location:Univerai of Toledo Llbr DroMurrant l referenced.d ign. tY Bancroft a consistent el c the tenant plant deceits, amendment would not(I)Involve a Documents Department,280L$a0taroft and the channel calibration requirements of significant increase in the probability or Avenue,Toledo.Ohio 43800. the switches will be deleted based on their consequences of an accident previously Attorney for licensee:Gerald nonadiastabillry■tter initial installation. evaluated.(2)create the possibility of a Charaoft Esquire,Shaw,Pittman,Potts Thane Proposed Changes will have no effect new or different kind of accident from and Trowbridge,2300 N Street.N.W., on the safety function of any system or any accident previously evaluated,or(3) Washington.DC 20007. component involve a significant reduction in a NRCProject Director.John N.Hannon 2 su w hot crate the PobWty of•now different kind of accident from any accident margin of safety. Toledo Edison Company and The osed The licensee has provided the Cleveland Electric Illuminating changes a adminisvaluatedtrative tiaoswe the re and following analysis of no significant Company.Docket No.50.346.Davis- prov�°°�s are admstency et to natal and hazards considerations using the confiuratide for o.teptegcyysnveahpl°°t rag Bases Nuclear Power Station.Unit Na z, unOguntloh,testing and scenes Commission's standards. Ottawa County,Ohio requirements,and do not affect any of the Toledo Edison has reviewed the proposed assumptions used in previous&oddest changes and determined that a significant Date of amendment request:August S. evaluations.All accidents continue to be hazards consideration does not extra because 1988 bounded by previous analysis and the operation of the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Description of amendment request. proposed administrative changes will not Station.Unit No.1.in accordance with these The proposed amendment would revise introduce the possibility of any new ce changes would: the present reference t0 Control Rod different kind of accident. 1,not involve a significant increase in the position limit Switches to the correct &not involve a shmilicant reduction in the probability or consequences of an accident reference of Control Rod Position ma rgin of safety are previously evaluated because the ESF Switches for remote shutdown administrative ia�ture and use the chants ovide for atmosphere cleanup systems are standby inntiUrheatstlOlL Also,the systems designed to mitigate the requirement cowlatehcy between plant configuration. consequences of certain design basis to perform•channel calibration of these testing and haws requirements.T accidents.The Surveillance Requirements switches every 18 months would be changes are being made to property Merinos (SR)changes clarify testing requirements and deleted. existing instrumentation and to correct the update regulatory and industry testing An additional change mentioned in channel calibration requlromante to account references for N PA filters and charcoal the application regarding deletion of a for the nonad)wteMliry ol components o! adsorber ants in FSF atmosphere cleanup footnote in Table 4.3.0 that is no longer shat instrvmentatlon.The proposed change• systems.Similarly,tha SR changes to these applicable has already been involve no reduction N the margin otsafery, • systems do not increase the probability or accomplished b Based on the previous discussions.the consequences of a previously evaluated- D y Amendment No.13S licensee concluded that the proposed accident. that made numerous administrative and amendment 2.not create the possibility of a new or editorial changes throughout the request does not involve a different kind of accident from any accident Technical Specifications. significant increase in the probability or previously evaluated because there are no Basis for proposed no significant consequences of an accident previously equipment modifications to the ESP hazards consideration determination: evaluated:does not create the stmosphere cleerup systems associated with The Commission has provided possibility of a new or different kind of this change.Similarly,the clarification and standards for determining whether a accident from any accident previously updating of tl:e test procedure and significant hazards consideration exists evaluated and does not involve a text new stance cnteris does different kind of accident. any as stated in 10 CFR 50.92.A proposed reduction in the required margin of 3.not involve a significant reduction in the amendment t0 m operating license fora safety. margin of safety because system operation facility involves no significant hazards The staff has reviewed tho licensee's . and components will not be changed and the consideration if operation of the facility no significant hazards comideredon SRs are being updated consistent with NRC In accordance with a proposed determination and agrees with the guidance. amendment would not(1)involve a licensee's analysis.The staff.therefore. Based on the previous discussions,the significant increase in the probability or proposes to determine that the licensee's licensee concluded that the proposed consequences of an accident previously request does not involve a significant amendment request does not involve a evaluated.(2)create the possibility of a hazards consideration. significant increase in the probability or new or different kind of accident from Local PubllcDbcument Room consequences of an accident previously any accident previously evaluated,or(3) location:University of Toledo Library, evaluated:does not create the involve a significant reduction In a Documents Department,280'1 Bancroft possibility of a new or different kind of margin of safety. Avenue,Toledo,Ohio 43008, accident from any accident previously The licensee has provided the Attorney for licensee:Gerald evaluated;and does not involve a fallowing analysis of no significant Charnoff,Esquire,Shaw,Pittman,Potts Federal Register / Vol. 55. No. 183 / Wednesday. August 22. 1990 / Notices 94383 and Trowbridge.2300 N Street N.W. by the use of higher fuel enrichment.It should NRC Prefect Director.John N. Washington.DC 20037. be noted here that any changes in the nuclear Hannon. NRC Project Director.John N.Harmoa properties of the reactor core that may result NOTICE or ISSUANCE OF Wisconsin Public Service Corporation, from higher fuel eMablamta would ba Docket No.50,105.Kewaunee Nuclear analyzed m the appropriate reload analysis. AMENDMENT TO FACILITY Power Plant Kewaunee County. (b)Create the possibility of a new or OPERATING LICENSE Wisconsin different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated • Dote of amendment request:July S As discussed above,the only salary issue During the period since publication of 1990 and July 10.1900 the last biweekly notice.the Description o amendment request• eigndicanty affected by the proposed change Commission has issued the following P f la the criticality analysis of the spent fuel The proposed amendment would revise storage pool and new fuel storage pit.Since it amendments.The Commission has • the Technical Specifications(TS)5.3.'2 has been demonstrated Out Keff remains determined for each of these to increase the allowable fuel below 0.95 and 098 respectively in those amendments that the application enrichment at the Kewaunee Nuclear areas,no new or different accident would be complies with the standards and Power Plant.The current enrichment created through the use of fuel enrichments requirements of the Atomic Energy Act limit is 30.5 grams of uranuum-235 per up to 475 weight Percent oranlom•235 at the of 1954.as amended(the Act),and the axial centimeter of fuel assembly.which Kewaunee Nuclear Power Plant Commissions rules and regulations.The corresponds to an as-built weight (c)Involve a significant reduction in a Commission has made appropriate percent of 3.67.The proposed margin of safety. findings as required by the Act and the amendment would increase the Since the analyses have shown that Commission's rules and lions in 10 enrichment limit to 492 grams of Increasing the allowable weight percent Com iss t �a uranuim-235 per axial centimeter,or 4.75 enrichment to 475 would not increase Kell Chapter L which are set forth in the as-built weight percent above MOS in the spent fuel storage pool and license amendment Basis for proposed no significant 0.96 in the new fuel storage pit it m Notice of Consideration of Issuance of hazards consideration determination: concluded that this proposed change would Amendment to Facility Operating The Commission has provided have no impact on the margin of safety as license and Proposed No Significant defined to the basis for any Kewaunee Hazards Consideration Determination standards for determining whether a significant hazards consideration exists Nuclear Power Plant nuclear pro ernes Specification. and Opportunity for Hearing in Any oranges in the nuclear prom high of the as stated in 10 CFR 50.92 A proposed reactor core that may result from IItgIIee fuel C°°°°orlon with these actions was amendment to an operating license for a enrichments would be anslyyzed in the published in the Federal Register as facility involves no significant hazards appropriate reload analysis to ensure indicated No request for■hearing or consideration if operation of the facility compliance with applicable reload petition for leave to intervene was filed in accordance with a proposed considerations and requirements. following this notice. amendment would not(1)involve a In conclusion•the analyses performed in Unless otherwise indicated the significant increase in the probability or support of the proposed change have Commission has determined that these consequences of an accident previously demonstrated that increasing the maximum amendments satisfy the criteria for evaluated(2)create the possibility of a allowable fuel enrichment at the Kewaunee categorical exclusion to accordance new or different kad of accident from Nuclear Power Plant to 492 grams(473 with 10 CFR 5122 Therefore.pursuant any accident previously evaluated,or(3) weight percent)of uranium-235 per rode! involve a significant reduction in a Centimeter of fuel assembly does not involve to 10 CFR S1.72(b).n0 environmental margin of safety a significant hazards consideration. impact statement or environmental The licensee has provided the Based on the previous discussions.the assessment need be prepared for these following analysis of no significant licensee concluded that the proposed amendments.If the Commission has hazards considerations using the amendment request does not involve a prepared an environmental assessment Commission's standards. significant increase in the probability or under the special circumstances . (a)Involve a signlficant increase In the consequences of an accident previously provision is i0 CFR 51.12(b)and has probability or consequences of an accident .evaluated does not create the made a determination based on that previously evaluated possibility of a new or different kind of assessment it is so indicated. The criticality analysis which was accident from any accident previously For further details with respect to the performed In support of this proposed change evaluated:and does not involve a action see(i)the applications for demonstrated that adequate margins to redhullon in the required margin of amendments (2)the amendments.sad criticality can be maintained with fuel safety. enrichments up to 4.73 weight percent of (3)the Commission's related letters. uranium-235 stored in the new fuel and spent The staff has reviewed the licensee's Safety Evaluations and/or fuel storage racks.The bounding cases of the no significant hazards consideration );environmental Assessments as analyses demonstrated that Kett remains less determination and agrees with the indicated All of these items are than 093 in the spent fuel pool and less than licensees analysis.The staff.therefore, available for public inspection at the One in the new fuel storage pit.Therefore.the proposes to determine that the licensee's 4.75 weight percent enrichment is acceptable. request does not involve a significant Commission's Public Document Room. Other than criticality.the only other accident hazards consideration. the Gelman$uilding.212/J L Street that need be considered is a fuel handling N.W,Washington.D.C.,and at the local accident.Since the mass of the fuel assembly Local Public Document Room public document rooms for the would not be appreciably altered by the location:University of Wisconsin particular facilities involved A copy of increased fuel enrichment the probability of Library Learning Center.2420 Nicolet items(2)and(3)may be obtained upon this accident occurring is not changed Drive.Green Bay.Wisconsin 54301. request addressed to the U.S.Nuclear Because fission product Inventories in a fuel assemblyare not•significant tunotienofinitial Attorney for licensee:Davldflaker. RegulatoryCommission.Washington. fuel enrichment to consequences of a fuel Esq..Foley and Lardnen P.O•Box 2193, DC 20555,Attention Director.Division handling accident also would not be affected Orlando.Florida 31062. of Reactor Projects. 34386 Federal Register / Vol. 55, No. 163 / Wednesday. August 22 1990 / Notices s Carolina Power 6 light Company,et rd., Local Public Document Room significant hazards consideration Docket No,50.400,Shearon Harris location:Monroe County Library comments received:No. Nuclear Power Plant.Unit 1,Wake and System.3700 South Custer Road, Local Public Document Room Chatham Counties.North Carolina Monroe,Michigan 46161. location:Government Publications Dote of application for amendment Florida Power and Light Company,et al. Section.State Library of Pennsylvania. October 26,1989.as supplemented Docket No.50389,$6 Ludo Plant Unit Walnut Street and Commonwealth December 15.1989. No.2,St.Ludo County,Florida. Avenue.Box 1601,Harrisburg. Brief description of amendment.The Pennsylvania 17105. , amendment request clarifies the Dote of application for amendment Georgia Power Company. nth requirements of Item b.a and Action February 7.1990,as supplemented June r'&a oroe Statement 23 of Technical Specification 19,194a Power Corporation.Municipal Electric Table 3.3.3,Engineered Safety Features Brief description of amendment This Authority of Georgia.City of Dalton Actuation System instrumentation. amendment incorporates revised Georgia,Docket Nos.50-424 and 50.425. •Currently,the required i.,:,x.uaf or pressure/temperature Ml limits and a oZ Electric ��Plant,Units 1 chanrwls for manual initiation o[ the results of a revised low temperature ry• eta auxiliary feedwater le listed as one per overpressure protection(LTOP)analysis Date of application for amendments: pump.This is correct for the motor into the Technical Specifications for St March 22,ipso driven auxiliary feedwater pumps; Lucie Unit 2 for up to 15 effective full Brief description of amendments The however,the turbine driven auxiliary power years(EFPY)of operation.The amendments remove cycle-specific feedwater pump has two control current St.Lucie Unit 2 Technical limits from the Technical Specifications channels per pump,one of which is Specifications for PT and LTOP are and place them in a separate Core required to manually start the pump. applicable to 6 EFPY of operation. Operating Limits Report per the The amendment request incorporates Accordingly.the SL Lucie Unit 2 guidance of NRC Generic Letter 88.16. separate line items for the motor driven Technical Specifications require Date of issuance:July 30.1990 pumps and for the turbine driven pump revision prior to the plant reaching a Effective dote:July 30.1990 reflecting the number of channels EFPY, Amendment Nos.:32 and 12 required for each pump. Date of issuance:August 1.1990 Facility Operating License Nos.NPF- Date of issuance:July 31.1990 Effective dote:August 1.1990 68 and NPF-81:Amendments revised the Effective date:July 31.1990 Amendment No.46 Technical Specifications. Amendment No.20 Facility Operating License No.DPR- Date of initial notice in Federal Facility Operating License No,NPF- 37:Amendment revised the Technical Register April 18,1990(SS FR 14508) 63.Amendment revises the Technical Specifications. The Commission's related evaluation of Specifications. Dote of initial notice in Federal the amendments is contained in a Safety Dale o initial notice in Federal Register,March 7.1990(55 FR 8224) Register:of 21990 55 FR 18410)The The Commissions related evaluation Evaluation dated July 30.1990.No °� y ( of the amendment Is contained in a significant hazards consideration amend Commission*is related evaluation t the Safety Evaluation dated August 1,1990. comments received:No. amendment fa contained in s Safety ty Local Public Document Room Evaluation dated July 31,1990 NO No significant hazards consideration location:Burke County Library.412 significant hazards consideration comments received No Sn Fourth Street.Waynesboro.Georgia comments receive' Na Local Public Document Room Local Public Document Room location:Swam Library.College of 30830. loco4'on:Cameron Village Regional William and Mary.Williamsburg Georgia Power Company Oglethorpe Library,1930 Clark Avenue,Raleigh. Virginia 23165 Power Corporates*.Municipal Electric North Carolina 27605, GPU Nuclear Corporation•et aL,Docket Authority of Georgia,Cry of Dalton Detroit Edison Company,Docket No,50- No.soots,Three Mile Island Nuclear •Docket Nos 50.424 and SO-425, 341.Fermi- Monroounty e C .Michigan Station.Unit No.1.Dauphin County, Voktls Electric Generating Pleat Units 1 2 Pennsylvania and 2 Burke County,Georgia Date of application for amendment o August 4.1788 as supplemented August Date of application for amendment January Date e f S�pation for amendments: 78,1989 March 23.1490 Brief description of amendment This Brief description of amendment Brief description of amendments: amendment revises the Technical Extends the expiration date of the These amendments revised Technical Specifications to allow extended Facility Operating License from May 1$ Specification 4.02 by deleting the operation of Ferme 2 at reduced power 2006 to Apri119.2014. regWretnent that the combined time with a single redreulation loop in Date of Issuance:August 10.1990 interval for any three consecutive operation. Effective date: August 10.1990 surveillance intervals not exceed 325 Date of issuance:July 27.1990 Amendment No.:154 times the specified surveillance irtervaL Effective date:July 27,1990 Facility Operating License No.DPR- The change is consistent with the Amendment No.:53 50.Amendment revised the expiration guidance of Generic fetter 89-14."Line- . Facility Operating License No.NPF- date of the license. Item Improvements in Technical 43.The amendment revises the Dote of initial notice in Federal Specifications-Removal of the 3.25 Technical Specifications Register.June 27.1990(55 FR 26283)The Limit on Extending Surveillance Date of initial notice in Federal Commission's related evaluation of this Intervals'. Register.June 27.1990(55 FR 26283) amendment is contained in■Safety Date of issuance:July 31.1990 The Commission's related evaluation Evaluation dated August 10.1990.The effective date:July 31,1990 of the amendment is contained in a Commission has also issued an Amendment Not:33 and 13 Safety Evaluation dated July 27,2090. Environmental Assessment and Finding Facility Operating License Nos.NPF- No significant hazards consideration of No Significant Impact related to this 58 and NPF-B2:Amendments revised the comments received:No. action July 23,1990(55 FR 29921).No Technical Specifications. Federal Register / VOL 55, No. 183 / Wednesday. August 22. 1990 / Notices 34387 Date of initial notice in Federal Loco!Public Document Room Indiana Michigan Power Company, Register.March 21,1990(55 FR 10533) location:The Vespasian Warner Public Docket Nos.50.315 and SOJ16,Donald The Commission's related evaluation Library,120 West Johnson St:eet, C Cook Nuclear Plant Unit Nos.1 and of the amendments is contained in a Clinton Blinois 61727. $Berrien County,Melds=n Safety Evaluation dated July 3t,1990. No significant hazards consideration minas Power company.DockM No.50• Dote of application for amendments: comments roceivad No. 46L Clinton Poway Station.Unit L April 7.1989 Local Public Document Room DeWitt County'Illinois Brief description of amendments: ' location:Burke County Library,412 Date of application for amendment Theis amendments change the Fourth Street.Waynesboro.Georgia February 5,1086 Technical Specification(TS)reporting 308.10 Description of amendment request requirements associated with the ' Gulf States Utilities Company,Docket The change incorporated the Startup specific activity of the primary coolant No.50458,River Head Sadon.Unit 1 Test Program data into the Clinton in accordance with Generic letter 85-19. West Feliciano Parish,Louidaoa Technical Specific.done. "Repotting Requirements on Primary Date of issuance: August 21990 Coolant Iodine Spikes."The TS Dote of amendment request May 14, Effective date: August 2 1990 requirements for reactor shutdown when 1990 iodine activity limits are exceeded for Brief description of amendment The Amendment No.: 42 800 hours in a 12-month period have also amendment revised the"Minimum Facility Operating License No.NAP- been deleted Temperature vs.Reactor Pressure" The amendment revised the Date of Issuance:August 2.1990 curTechnical Specification. and the a TechnicalSpecificationas.Thechanges rages 0 Dote o initial notice in Federal Effective date:August 21990 and the associated Bases.The changes t Amendment Nos_142/129 were made in response to Generic Letter Regiutas:December 141988(53 FR 88-11 which advised licensees to use the awe, Facility Operating Licenses Nos.DPR- methods described in Revision 2 of The Commission's related evaluation 38 and DPR-74.Amendments revised the Regulatory Guide 1.99 to predict the of the amendment is contained in a Technical Specifications. effect of neutron radiation on reactor Safety Evaluation dated August 2.1990. Dote of fried noddy in Federal vessel materials. No significant hazards consideration Regletee:March 21.1990(55 FR 10537). Date of issuance:August 1.1990 comments received:No The Commission's related evaluation Effective date:August 1,1990 Local Public Document Room of the amendments is contained in a Amendment No.: 45 location:The Vespasian Warner Public Safety Evaluation dated August 21990 Facility Opemting License No.NPF• Library,120 West Johnson Street. No significant hazards consideration 47.The amendment revised the Clinton.Illinois 61727. comments received:No. , Technical Specifications. Pos ComPend Local Public Document Room DIMSer y an Dote of Initial notice in Federal locotion:Maude Preston Asterisk. 27.1990( Power Ceope ode&Inc.,Docket No•5G Register:11r Co)muam�fesionrelatedFR �'Anton Power Stadon.Unit No.L o m'49085. =Market Street St of the amendment is contained in a Demon County Minds Safety Evaluation dated August 1.1990. Date of application for amendment Indiana an Power Company' No significant hazards consideration April 25 1993 Docicet Nay 50.315 and 50-316.Donald comments received:No. Description of amendment request C Cook Nuclear2 Bunten C°'mty.middy= unt Plat.Unit Noe.1 and Local Public Document Room This amendment revised interlock and ' location:Government Documents overload setpoints for the main hoist of Date of application for amendments: Department Louisiana State University, the refueling platform,due to February 7.2990 Baton Rouge.Louisiana 70803 installation of•new model mast:and Brief description of amendments: Illinois Power company.Docket No.50- revised the size of tha additional These amendments modify Technical 481,Clinton Power Station,Unit L samples for snubber functional Specification(TS)402 in accordance DeWitt County,Miaols inspections.sifter snubber failures.so as with guidance provided in Generic Date o application or amendment to make all three sampling plans Letter 8944."Line Item Improvements in t t statistically equivalent Technical Specifications-Removal of February 5.1988 Dare°flam enco:August 3,1990 the 325 Limit on Extending Surveillance Description of amendment request Effective date:August 3.1990 Intervals.'The amendments remove the The change deleted License Condidon Amendment No.:43 323 limit for the extension of 3 2.C.(8)which required retrain Senior Facility Operating "numb"surveUlence interval The . Reactor Operator experience on each pe tln8lrcenae No.NPF• surveillance interval wall still be shift during the first year of operation. 02.The amendment revised the Date of issuance: July 30 1990 Technical Specifications. constrained by the 25 percent interval Effective dote: July 30,1990 Date of Initial notice in Federal extension criteria of TS 4.02 ' Amendment No.: 41 Register.June 27.1990(55 FR 28285 and Date of iseuonce:August 3.1990 Facility Operating License No.NPF- 28288) Effective dote:August 3.1990 tit.The amendment revised the License The Commission's related evaluation Amendments Nos_143/130 Date of Initial notice in Federal of the amendment is contained in a Foetidly Operating Licenses Nos.DPR• Register.December 14,1988(53 FR Safety Evaluation dated August 3,1990. 58 and DPR•74 Amendments revised the 50327) No significant hazards consideration Technical Specifications. The Commission's related evaluation comments received:No Date of initial notice M Federal of the amendment is contained in a Local Public Document Room Register.March 21,1990(55 FR 10539). Safety Evaluation dated July 30.1990. location:The Vespasian Warner Public The Commission's related evaluation of No significant hazards consideration Library.1.20 West Johnson Street, the amendments is contained in a Safety commenta received:No Clinton.Illinois 61727. Evaluation dated August 3.1990.No 34388 Federal Register / Vol. 55. No. 183 / Wednesday. August 22. 1990 / Notices aignificant hazards consideration Power Authority of the State of New Specification 410."Service Inspection comments received No. York,Docket No.50433,James A. of Steam Generator Tubing."to delete Local Public Document Room FitzPabick Nuclear Power Plant. the special inspection requirements of location:Maude Preston Palenske Oswego County,New York Specification 4.10.x. Nfemorial Library,500 Market Street,St. Date of application for amendment Dote of issuance:August 10.7990 Joseph,Michigan 49085. December 15,1989 Effective date:This license Philadelphia Electric Company.Docket Brief description of amendment The amendment is effective the date of Nos.50.332 acid 504.3,Limerick amendment updates the diesel generator issuance and must be fully implemented , Generating Station Units 1 and; fuel oil quality limits for water.sediment no later than 30 days from date of Montgomery County.Pennsylvania and ash.It also clarifies the design basis issuance. for the diesel fuel oil day tanks and Amendment No.:133 Dale of application for amendment storage tanks. Provisional Operating License No. • June 14,1990 Date of issuance:August 10.1990 DPRd3.Amendment revised the Brief description of amendment:The Effective date: August 10.1990 Technical Specifications. amendments revised the Technical Amendment No.:184 Dote of initial notice in Federal Specifications to remove the operability Facility Operating License No.DPR• Register:July 13.1988(53 FR 26531) requir_ments for the Average Power 59:Amendment revised the Technical The Commission's related evaluation Range hfonitora in Operational Specification, of the amendment is contained in a Condition 5(Refueling)except while Date ofIniti°l notice in Federal Safety Evaluation dated August 10.1990. performing a shutdown margin Register.February 21.1990(55 FR 8114) No significant hazards consideration demonstration. The Commission's related evaluation comments received:No comments. Date of issuance:July 30.1990 of the amendment is contained in a Local Public Document Room Effective dote:July 30,1990 Safety Evaluation dated August 10.1900. location:General Library,University of Amendment Nos.41 and 7 No significant hazards consideration California,Post Office Box 19557.Irvine. comments received:No California 92713. Facility Operating License Nos.NPF- 39 and NPF-85.This amendment revised Local Public Document Room location:Penfield Library.State TU Electric.Docket No So-ass the Technical Specifications. University College of Oswego,Oswego, Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station, Date of initial notice in Federal New York. Unit No.3.Somervell County.Texas Register.lune 27.1090(55 FR 28291)The Commission's related evaluation of the Public Service Company of New Dote of amendment request June 22. amendment 1s contained in a Safety Hampshire.Docket No.50.443,Seabrook 1980 Evaluation dated July 30,1990.No Station.Rocklagham County,New Brief description of amendment The significant hazards consideration Hampshire amendment changes Technical comments received No Date of application for amendment Specifications 323.421 and an to Loco/Public Document Room Aril 23,1990.as supplemented on April allow Base Load Operation orm ton er an location:Pottstown Public Library.500 241990,and June 8,1990. P alternative to the normal operating High Street.Pottstown,Pennsylvania Brief Description of amendment mode in order to maintain the as radial 19484. Revise Facility Operating License No. Peaking factor safetwithiy the range assumed NPF-88 to allow the United Illuminating by the plant's safety nd,anal1y sages iniceL Power Authority of the State of New Company to enter into an arrangement specification 0.9.3A end the Bases to York,Docket No.50-333,ranee A for the sale and leaseback of s portion Section 3/421 have also been revised to L'1tzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant of their financial interest in Seabrook reflect the new Base Load mode of ea Oswego County,New York operation. Station.Unit 1 to certain equity Date of Issuance:July 31.1990 Date of application for amendment investors. • March 9.1990 Date o issuance:July 25.1990 Effective date:July 31.1990 Brief description of amendment The Effective dote:July 20.1990 Amendment Na:1 amendment clarifies Specification Amendment No.:l Facillty°Penning License No.NPF- 3.9.13.3 by removing the term"both Facility Operating License No.NPF- 87.Amendment revised the Technicaldiesel generator systems"and corrects 86:Amendment revised the License. Specifications. two editorial errors. Date of initial notice in Federal Dote of initial notice in Federal Date of issuance:July 30.1990 Register.May 30.1990(55 FR 21977) Register.iune 29.1990($5 FR 268001 The The Commission's related evaluation Commission's related evaluation of the Effective dole:July 30.1990 of the amendment is contained in a amendment is contained in a Safety Amendment Na 183 Safety Evaluation dated July 28,1990. Evaluation dated July 37.1990. . Facility Operating License No.DPR- No significant hazards consideration No significant hazards consideration 59:Amendment revised the Technical comments received:No comments received:No. Specification. Local Public Document Room Local Public Document Room Date of initial notice in Federal location:Exeter Public Library.47 Front Location:University of Texas at ' Register,May 30.1990(55 FR 21978)The Street.Exeter.New Hampshire 03833 Arlington library,Government Commission's related evaluation of the Publications/Maps.701 South Cooper,P. amendment is contained in a Safety Soutbem California Edieoa ComPanY,M O.Box 19497,Arlington,Texas 78019. Evaluation dated July 30,1990.No al,Docket No.50408,San Onofrs significant hazards consideration Nuclear Generating Station,Unit No.I. Tennessee Valley Authority.Docket comments received No San Diego County,California Nos'60.327 and 50428,Signoyab Local Public Document Room Dote of application for amendment NuCleu Plant,Udts 1 and Z Hamilton location:Penfield Library,State October 30.1987 Cam'Tennessee University College of Oswego,Oswego. Brief description of amendment The Date of application for amendments: New York amendment revises Technical February 14,t990(TS 90-06) • Federal Register / V0L 55. No. 183 / Wednesday. August 22, 1990 / Notica 34389 Brief description of amendments: and Lindell Boulevard,.St.Louis. Virginia Electric and Power Company,et These amendments modify Section 3/ Missouri 83130. al.,Docket Nos.50438 and 50139.Narth 4.7.11,Fire Suppressions Systems.of Anna Power Station.Units No.1 and Ne. Virginia Electric and Power Company.et .. Louisa candy.vugia a Soquoyah Units 2 end 2 Tv-bairn' al.,Docket Nos.504.38 and 56439.North "ISpeciLca ns tio .A fire hose station in the Anon Power Station.Unita No.1 and No. Dote of application for amerdetenor diesel generator building ie added to 2 Louisa County.Virginia February 1,1992 as sapykn.ented lintyTable 3.7.5,Fire Hose Stations.In 1990 addition,for the Unit 1 TS*only,an Date of application foromendmenls: incorrect reference to a Table 37-10 is May 18.1990 Brief description of amendments:The changed to Table 37.5 and the Brief description of amendments: amendments revise the NA•1&2TS . inadvertently omitted elevation for the These amendments revise the noble gas Section 6.5 and bring the NA-1&275 in fire hose station in the air exhaust room high range effluent monitor setpoints conformance with the Westinghouse in the diesel generator building ts added specified in the NA-1&2 TS.Table 356. Standard TS The changes repines*the to Table 3.75, Dote of issuance:July 31.1980 Independent/Operational Event Review Date of issuance:July 31,1990 Effective dote:July 31.1990 Croup with a new Management Safety Effective date:July 31.1990 Amendment Noa:133&117 Review Committee(MSRC)as the Amendment Nos.:143&124 Facility Operating License Nos.N w.4 organization responsible for the NA-1&2 Facility Operating Licenses Nos.DPR- and NPF-7.Amendments revised the offsite review committee.Also,the 77 and DPR-79.Amendments revised the Technical Specifications. audits requited by the TS that were the Technical Specifications. Date of initlol notice in Federal responsibility of the Quality Assurance Date of initial notice in Federal Register.June 27.1990(55 FR 28297)The Department will now be performed Register March 21.1993(55 FR 1054.3) Commission's related evaluation of the under the cognizance of the MSRC. The Commission's related evaluation of amendments is contained in a Safety Finally,the amendments delete or the amendments is contained in a Safety Evaluation dated July 3L 1980. modify management titles to reflect Evaluation dated July 31,1990. No significant hazards consideration Rant Changes. No significant hazards consideration comments received:No. Dote of issuance:August 7.1990 comments received:No Loco/Public Document Room Effective dote:August 7,1990 Local Public Document Room locotion:The Alderman Library, Amendment Nos:13S&178/ocat/on:Chattanooga-Hamilton County Manuscripts Department.University of Libmry.1001 Broad Street.Chattanooga, Virginia,Charlottes _ Virginia 22901. Facility Operating License Nos.NPFJ Tennessee 37402 and NPF•7.Amendments revised the Union Electric Company.Docket No StY Virginia Electric and Power Company,et Technical Specification& 483. nCallaway Plant,Unit 1.Docket No. al..Docket No.SOJ78.North Anna Date of Initial notice in Federal Power Station,Unit No.1,Loads Register:March 7.1990(55 PR 82371111e County.Missouri County,Virginia Commission's related evaluation of the Date of application for amendment Date of application for amendment amendments to contained In•Safety March 0,1990 Aril 27.1990 Evaluation dated August 7.1990. Brief description ofamendmeneThe p amendment modified the Limiting Brief description of amendment:This The July 30.1999leiter provided Conditions for Operation to address amendment allows a one-time extension additional information requested by the flowpath requirements of the motor of 8 months for test intervals for certain staff regarding the constitution of a driven and steam turbine-drivensurveillance tests specified in the NAd MS quorum and the timeliness of the RC auxiliary feedweter pumps Technical Specifications(TS).This one- meeting minutes.The additional Additionally,it provided further time extension is necessary to information did not alter in any way the requirements to the ACTION Statementscompensate for the extended NAd staffs initial determination of no if any of the Essential Service Water seventh refueling outage that occurred significant hazards consideration. (FSW)system valves to the steam from February 25.1989 to July 15.3982 No significant hazards consideration turbine-driven auxiliary feedwater pump This outage.together with additional comments receive&No. were inoperable or if one ESW loop was time allowed for optimum fuel b . - Laval Public Doammeet Room inoperable. before the next refueling outage,bas location:The Alderman Library. Dote of issuonce:July 27.1980 resulted in a 6-month deferral of the Manusaipts Department University of next refueling outage for NA-1. Effective date:July 27.1990 Virginia,Charlottesville,Virginia 2290]. Amendment Na:56 Data of issuance:August 2.1990 Facility Operating License Na NPP Effective dote:August Z 1990 Virginia Electric and Power Company.et 30.Amendment revised the Technical Amendment Nos:134 al.,Docket Nos 50438 and 50.33&,North Specifications. Facility Operating License Nos,NPF-4 Alma Power Station.Units No-land No. Date of initial notice in Federal and NPF 7.Amendments revised the 2,Louisa County.Virginia ' Register:May 30.1990 license. Dote ofapplic don foremen ates& (55 FR 21981)The Commission's Dote of initial notice in Faded June 28.1903 related evaluation of the amendment is Register.June 13.1990(55 FR 24008)The Brief description of amendwuwrrThe contained in a Safety Evaluation&abed Commission's related evaluation of the amendments permit the suspension of July 27.1990. amendments is contained In a Safety �� turbine tthesugovernor vulvae No significant hazards consideration Evaluation dated August 2,1990. cycling g the etdof e� e power comments received No. No significant boson*munaiderodon etas-e the between a MWe(Six firB Load Public Document Room comments received No. co�J and et ern (5 M% e power), locatiotr Callaway County Public Loco, Public Document Roam Library,710 Court Street Fulton. location:The Alderman Library, Does of issutmcm Augast10.1990 Missouri 65251 and the Jobe.M Olin Manuscripts Department,University of Effective dote:August 10.1901 ' Library,Washington University,Skiaker Virginia,Charlottesville,Virginia 22902 Amendment Nas:136&129 • 51390 Federal Register / Vol. 55, No. 183 / Wednesday, August 22 1990 / Notices Facility Operating License Nos.NPF-4 was the staffs understanding that the Brief description of amendment:This and NPF-7.Amendments revised the licensee intends to pursue revisions change incorporates wording from Technical Specifications. pertaining to Technical Specification Standard Westinghouse Technical Date of initial notice in Federal 3.0.4 as part of their application under Specifications into YNPS's LCO Register July 10.1990(55 FR 28327)The the technical specification improvement Specifications 3.10.3 and 3.10A.This Commission's related evaluation of the program.Therefore,no further action wording allows physics testing to be amendments is contained in a Safety will be taken on that portion of the conducted with the number of Evaluation dated August 10.1990. licensee's application. OPERABLE Power Range and No significant hazards consideration Date of issuance:August 1,1990 Intermediate Power Range Neutron Flux comments received:No. Effective date:August 1,1990 channels being determined by the LCO Local Public Document Room Amendment No.:88 requirements of Technical Specification location:The Alderman Library, Facility Operating License No.NPF- 3.3.1 instead of the specific number of ' Manuscripts Department.University of 21:Amendments changed the Technical channels presently specified. Virginia,Charlottesville.Virginia 22901. Specifications. Dote of issuance:August 2,1990 Virginia Electric and Power Company, Date of initial notice in Federal Effective dote:This amendment is Docket Noe.50.280 and 56281,Suety Register April 19,1989(54 FR 15840) effective August 2,1990. Power Station.Unit Nos.1 and 2,Sorry The Commission's related evaluation of Amendment No.:133 County,Virginia, the amendment is contained in a Safety Facility Operating License No.DPR- for amendments: Evaluation dated August 1.1990, 28:Amendment revised the Technical Dote of application October11.198 essupersededOctober No significant hazards consideration Specifications. 1989 comments received:No. Date of initial notice in Federal Brief description of amendments:The Local Public Document Room Register.June 18.1990(55 FR 24874)The amendments increased the number of location:Richland Public Library,955 Commission's related evaluation of the auxiliary feedwater pumps available for Northgate Street,Richland.Washington amendment is contained in a Safety cross-connect to the opposite unit from 99352. Evaluation dated August 2 1990. one to two. Washington Public Power Supply No significant hazards consideration No Date of issuance:August 2.1990 System.Docket Na 56397,Nuclear comments Public received:Document Effective dote:August 21990 Project Na 2 Benton County, Local Public Document Room locotio Amendment Nos.143 h lee Washington location:Greenfield Community College. Facility Operating License Nos.DPR- 1 College Drive.Greenfield. 32 and DPR-37:Amendments revised the Date of application for amendmentMassachusetts 01301. Technical Specifications. January 9,1990 Yankee Atonic Electric Con pan . Dote of initial notice in Federal Brief description of amendment:This Docket Na 560¢8,Yankee Nuclear Register. 8, Marsh 1989(54 FR 9938)and amendment revises notation(4)in Table Power Station,Franklin County. June 13.1990(55 FR 24009)The 4.3.7.12.1,"Radioactive Gaseous Effluent Massachusetts Commission's related evaluation of the Monitoring Instrumentation Surveillance amendment is contained in a Safety Requirements.'Notation(4)applies to Date of application for amendment: Evaluation dated August 2.1990, the instrument identified as Radwaste April 20.1990 as supplemented June 27. No significant hazer&consideration Building Ventilation Exhaust,Effluent 1990. System Flow Rate Measurement Device. Brief description a comments received:No f amendment This Local Public Document Room The notation describes how the channel amendment incorporates the USNRC location:Swem Library,College of check will be performed.The guidance contained in Generic Letter 88- William and Mary,Williamsburg, amendment changes the manner in 17(Reference by into the YNPS Virginia 23185 which this will be done. Technical Specifications.Three new on Public Power Su Dote of issuance:August 3,1990 Technical Specifications are added Washington Supply Effective dote:August 3.1990 which specify the plant conditions and System,Docket No.50.397.Nuclear _ Amendment No.:89 equipment operability requirements to Project Na 2 Benton County, Facility Operating License No.NpF- prevent core uncovery if shutdown Washington 21:Amendments changed the Technical cooling is lost during reduced level. Dote of application for amendment: Specifications. operation.The change also addresses February 9.1989 Date of initial notice in Federal Low Temperature Overpressurization Brief description of amendment:This Register.February 21.1990(55 FR 0125) (LTOP),allowing operable SI pumps amendment revised Technical The Commission's related evaluation of during reduced level operation only Specification Surveillance Requirements the amendment is contained in a Safety after the Man Coolant System(MCS) 4.0.3 and 4.0.4 by replacing those Evaluation dated August 3.1990. has been adequately vented. existing requirements with the new No significant hazards consideration Date of Issuance:August 21990 surveillance requirmnents recommended comments received:No. Effective date:As of date of issuance. by Generic Letter 87-09.The amendment Local Public Document Room Amendment No:134 ' also made extensive revisions to Bases • location:Richland Public Library.955 Facility Operating License No.DPR- sectlons 3.0 and 4,0 by substituting new Northgate Street,Richland,Washington 28:Amendment revised the Technical sections provided in the Generic Letter. 99352 Specifications and/or License. The amendment application requested Dote of initiol notice in Federal revisions to Technical Specification 3.0.4 Yankee At I1een{e Company, Register:May 18,1990(55 FR 20385)The and to other sections of the Technical Docket Na 0-020.Yankee Nuclear Commiafon's related evaluation of the Specifications referencing 3,0.4.The Power Station.Franklin County' amendment is contained in a Safety staff has not reviewed that portion of Massachusetts Evaluation dated May 19.1990. the request and did not approve those Dote of applico.lon for amendment: No significant hazards consideration changes as part of the amendment.It May 31,1900 comments received:No Federal Register / VoL 55. No. 103 / Wednesday. August 22, 1900 / Notices 333SI Local Arbb'c Daenmeat Rorer NOTICE OF ISSUANCE OF comment.li comments have been location Greenfield Community College, AAffNDMENT TO mcan Y requested,it ta so stated In either event 1 College Drive,Creenfield, OPERATING LICENSE AND FATAL the State has been consulted by Massachusetts 01301. DETERMINATION OF NO telephone whenever possible. NOTICE OF ISSUANCE OF SIGNIFICANT HAZARDS Under its tegulatkms,the Coemnfesion AMENDMENT U NCEFAC OF CONSIDERATION AND may isms and make en amendment A E AMENDMENT LICENSE AND FINAL OPPORTUNITY FOR}TEARING immediately effective.notwithstanding • OPERATING UCEION S NO (EXIGENT'OR EMERGENCY the pendency before it of■request far• DETERMSIGNIFICANT HAZARDS CIRCUMSTANCES) hearing from any person in advance of CONSIDERATION During the period since publication of the holding and completion of any During the period since publication of the last biweekly notice,the required bearing,where it has the last biweekly period notice, pub individual Commission has ismed the followbg determined that no significant hazards amendments.The Commission has consideration to involved. notices of issuance of amendments have determined for each of these The Commission has applied the been issued for the facilities as listed amendments that the application for the standards of 10 CFR 50.92 and has made below.These notices were previously amendment complies with the standards a final determination that the published as separate individual and requirements of the Atomic Energy amendment involves no significant notices.They are repeated here because Act of 1954,as amended(the Act),and hazards consideration.The basis for this this biweekly notice lists all the Commissions rules and regulation determination Is contained in the amendments that have been issued for The Commission has made appropriate documents related to this action. which the Commission has made a final findings as required by the Act and the Accordingly.the amendments have been determination that an amendment commission.,miles and regulations in t0 issued and made effective as indicated. involves no significant hazards CER chapter',which are aet forth in the Unless otherwise indicated,the consideration. license amendment Conuniwtoo has determined that these In this case,a prior Notice of Because of exigent or emergency amendments satisfy the criteria for Consideration of Issuance of circumstances associated with the date categorical encluaion in accordance Amendment and Proposed No the amendment was needed,there was within CFR 51.22 Therefore,pursuant Significant Hazards Consideration not time for the Commission to publish. to 10 CFR 51-22@).no environmental Determination and OpporMdly for for public comment before imam&its impact statement or environmental Hearing was issued.a hearing was usual 30-day Notice of Conaidendon of assessment need be prepared for these requested and the amendment was Issuance of Amendment end Proposed amendments If the Commission has issued before any hearing because the No Significant Hazards Consideradoe prepared an environmental assessment Commission made a final determination Determination and Opportunity fora under the special ei cvmetanoes that the amendment involves no Hearing.For exigent circumstances,the Provision In 10 CFR 51.12(1)and has significant hazards consideration. Commission ham either issued a Federal made a determination based on that Details are contained in the individual Reeser notice providing opportunity for assessment it is so indicated notice as cited. public comment or has used local media For farther details with respect to the Long Island Lighting company,Docket to provide notice to the public In the action see(1)the application for No.50.322.Shoehorn Nudes Power area surrounding a llcen••e'•facility of amendment(2)the amendment to Station.Colt 1.Suffolk County.New the lioeasee's application and of the Facility Operating License-and(3)the York Commission's proposed determination Commission's related letter.Safety Data of applioaion foromeadmen@ of hazards amaideratkm. Evaluation and/or Environmental December of IS,19tt9 provided a Assessment as indicated AD of these BdeJdr 15.1 log amendment:This reasonable opportunity for the public to items are available for public Specter amendment added ova comraaat„sing Its boat effort•to make at the Commission's Pattie Document pawed of Facility available to the public mean of Root.the Gelman Building.2120 L Operating License Na NPF-82, communication for the public to respond Street N.W.Washington,D.C.,and at immediately foRowtti the text of lions *Jam,and in the ease of telephone the local public document room for the condition 2.C(13),a new license comments,the comments have been particular facility Involved, condition 2.C(14),to read es follow% recorded or transcribed ea appropriate A copy of items(2)and(3)may be 2.C(14)Defueled Emergency and the Hyenas*boa been informed of obtained apon request addressed to the Preparedness License Condition the public comments. U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The requiremeata set forth in license In circumstances where failure to ad Washington.DC 20555,Attention: ' conditions(9)through(13)will not aPPIT in a timely way waaid have resulted for Director.Division of Reactor Projects. if the following emanations exist:(1)The example,indenting or shutdown of• Thu Commission is also offering an reactor is void of all fuel assemblies, nuclear power plant or le prevention of opportunity for a hearing with rsspeet t„ . and(2)The spent fuel,with a hemp of either resumption of operation or of the issuance of the amendments.By approximately two effective fuRterme Mayan in power output„p In the September 21.1900,the licensee may file days,is stored in the spent fuel storage plenca licensed power level,the a request fora hearing with respect to pool or other approved storage Commission may not berthed en Issuance of the amendment to the configuradon. opportunity to provide for poblie gabled feeilib operating iieenes and Dote of issuance:Ng 31.1990 comment on its no significant hazards any person whose interest may be Amendment No.:s determination.In such ease,the limas affected by this proceeding and unmet Effective date:)nly 31.1990 • amendment has been issued without wishes to participate as a party in the Facility Opero6ieg bourse No.NPF- opportunity for commas&If these Itae.. proceeding must file a written petition 82:The Amendment revised the license. been some time for public comment but for UMW to(atervem.Requests for a ' Dote of individual notice in Feder, less than 30 days,the Commssion may hearing and petitions for leave to Register August 6,1990(55 FR 31914) provide an opportunity for public intervene shall be flied in accordance I 31392 Federal Register / Vol. 55, No. 163 / Wednesday. August 22. 1990 / Notices with the Commission's"Rules of provide references to those specific Commission.thepresidiag officer or the Practice for Domestic Licensing sources and documents of which the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board.that Proceedings"in 10 CFR Part 2.If a petitioner is aware and on which the the petition and/or request should be request for a hearing or petition for petitioner intends to rely to establish granted based upon a balancing of the leave to intervene is filed by the above those facts or expert opinion.Petitioner factors specified In SO CFR 2.714(a)(1)(i)- date,the Commission or an Atomic must provide sufficient information to (v)and 2.71.4(d). . Safety and Licensing Board designated show that a genuine dispute exists with Virginia Elaetek and Power Company.by the Commission or by the Chairman the applicant On a material issue Of law pany et of the Atomic Safety and Licensing or fact.Contentions shall be limited to al-Docket Noe.50-338 and 50.139,North Board Panel,will nde on the request matters within the scope of the Anna Power Station,Units No.1 and No. and/or petition and the Secretary or the amendments under consideration.The 2.Louisa County.Virginia designated Atomic Safety and Licensing contention must be one which,if proven, pate ojapplieation for amendments: Board will issue a notice of hearing or would entitle the petitioner to relief.A 1WY 23.1990 an appropriate order. petitioner who fails to file such a As required by 10 CFR 2.714,a supplement which satisfies these Brief description ojamendments:The petition for leave to intervene shall set requirements with respect to at least one amendments add a footnote to TS Table forth with particularity the interest of contention will not be permitted to 3.3-2,"Reactor Trip System the petitioner in the proceeding and how participate as a party. Instrumentation Response Times."Item that interest may be affected by the Those permitted to intervene become IL'Pressurizer Water Level High," results of the proceeding.The petition parties to the proceeding•subject t0 any which establishes startup(entry into should specifically explain the reasons limitations in the order granting leave to Mode 2)for the NA4.51 next operating why intervention should be permitted intervene.and have the opportunity to cycle as the date by which the with particular reference to the participate fully in the conduct of the pressurizer water level high trip following factors:(1)the nature of the hearing,including the opportunity to functions shall be demonstrated petitioner's tight under the Act to be present evidence and cross-examine operable.A Temporary Waiver of made a party to the proceeding:(2)the witnesses. Compliance was verbally granted on nature and extent of the petitioners Since the Commission has made a July 20.1990 to permit utilization of this property.fmanciaL or other interest in final determination that the amendment change until these amendments could be the proceeding:and(3)the possible involves no significant hazards issued.A letter confirming the effect of any order which may be consideration if a hearing is requested. temporary waiver was issued on July 25. entered in the proceeding on the it will not stay the effectiveness of the 1990, petitioner's interest The petition should amendment Any hearing held would Date of issuance:July 31.1900 also identify the specific aspect(s)of the take place while the amendment is in Effective date:July 31.1990 subject matter of the proceeding as to effect which petitioner wishes to intervene. A request for•hearing or a petition Amendment Nos.:132 611E Any person who has filed a petition for for leave to intervene must be filed with Facility Operating License Nos.NPF•4 leave to intervene or who has been the Secretary of the Commission U.S. and NPF•7.Amendments revised the admitted as a party may amend the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Technical Specifications. petition without requesting leave of the Washington.DC 20555.Attention Public comments requested as to Board up to fifteen(15)days prior to the Docketing end Services Branch.or may proposed no significant hazards first preheating conference scheduled in be delivered to the Commissions Public consideration:No. the proceeding.but such an amended Document Room,the Gelman Building. On July 20,1990.the staff verbally petition must satisfy the specificity 2120 L Street N.W..Washington D.C.. granted a Temporary Waiver of requirements described above. by the above date.Where petitions are Compliance which was immediately • Interested persons should consult a filed during the last ten(10)days of the effective and remained in effect until the current copy of 10 CFR 2.714 which is notice period it is requested that the proposed license amendments were available at the Commission's Public petitioner promptly so inform the Document Room.the Colman BWI issued A letter confirming the ding, t Commission by a tat 1480 telephone call temporary waiver was sent to the 2120 L Street.N.W..Washington.um to Western Union at 1{000)he Western rn licensee on Jul 25.1990.The 20555 and at the Local Public Document Missouri 1•(000)342.0700).The Western Y Room for the particular facility involved Union operator should be given Commission's related evaluation of the Not later than fifteen(15)days prior to Datagram Identification Number 3737 amendments consultation with the the first prehearing conference and the following message addressed to State of Virginia and final no significant scheduled in the proceeding,a petitioner (Project Director):petitioner's name hazards consideration determination are shall file a supplement to the petition to and telephone number,date petition contained in a Safety Evaluation dated intervene which must include a list of was mailed plant name:and publication PAY 31.19011 the contentions which are sought to be date and page number of this Attorney for licensee:Michael W. • litigated in the matter.Each contention FedeMi Register notice.A copy of the Maupin.Esq..Hunton and Williams must consist of a specific statement of petition should also be sent to the Office P.O.Box 1535.Richmond Virginia 23212 the issue of law or fact to be raised or of the General CounseL U.S.Nuclear Local Public Document Room controverted.In addition,the petitioner Regulatory Commission Washington. location:The Alderman Library, shall provide a brief explanation of the DC 20555,and to the attorney for the Manuscripts Department.University of bases of the contention and a concise licensee. Virginia.Charlottesville.Virginia 22901. statement of the alleged facts or expert Nontlmely filings of petitions for leave NRC Project Director.Herbert N. opinion which support the contention to intervene.amended petitions Berlrow and on which the petitioner intends to supplemental petitions and/or requests in ro Dated at RocimIle.Maryland,this 15th day rely p ving the contention at the for hearing will not be entertained of August moo. hearing.The petitioner must also absent a determination by the . Federal Register / Vol. 55. NO. 183 / Wednesday, August 24. .1990' / Ndriaee ' ' 34.39$ For the'Nuclear Regulatory Commission A portion of the discussion of panel Department gives notice that it will - David b.Matthews, composition will necessitate the review this order on its own motion. Acting Director.Division or Reactor Projects. disclosure of Information of a personal Br 1/!b Office ofNuclear ReocmrRegulation nature the disclosure of which would Swam&Kolko. 'Doc,9049.59 Filed 621.90,8:45 am) constitute a dearly unwarranted AdminiatrauveLaw/udge. BALM COO[78404141 invasion of personal privacy. Accordingly,this portion of the meeting in Doc 934PTP1 Flied a-21-98 845 am; will also be dosed to the public IMarO COX 0,04141 OFFICE OF SCIENCE ANO pursuant t0 S U.S.C.552 b.(C)(e). TECHNOLOGY POLICY Because of advanced security Federal Highway Administration , arrangements,persona wishing to attend Second Meeting of the National the open portion of the meeting should pameementm invent Statement Critical Technologies Panel Contact Mrs.Kathleen Elim.at(703)5211- Avallamaty;cents Armory in onetnm4 0090 prior to September 5,1990.Mrs, MA The second meeting of the National Critical Elim is also available t0 provide specific Technologies Panel,that was previously information regarding time,place end ACIENCT;Federal Highway scheduled to be held at the National Science agenda for the open session. Adminiatration(FHWA).DOT. Foundation.room 340.1000 G Street NW- Washington.DC,this coming August 27-28. Dated:August 17.1900. ACTtott Notice:extension of comment 1990.has been postponed until further notice. Damar W.Hawkins. period. Persons wishing to obtain more information Executive Assistant.Off ice of Science and on this action.please contact Mr.Jose L Technology Policy. This document extends the Christian st(202)395-5738. (FR Doc.90-19807 Filed 0-20-00:9:34 am] comment period for EIS No.900158. Dated:August 17,1990. DSuppL FHW,MA.Central Artery/1-93 DOOM Hawkins. �+*COse alleew to Third Harbor Tunnel/140 Extension DOOMivawkin Assistant.Office of Science and — ta Boston.MA from August 22.1990 to ExecutTechnology Policy. DEPARTMENT OFTRANSPORTATION Septembere nta This availenviability mental (FR Doc.90.19808 Filed 821-90,8:45 am) impact statement evaflebtlity sift le0 Cow 3170.0141 Offf a Of Haring, information was published by the Environmental Protection Agency at 55 (Docket 47090) FR 20828 on May 1&1990.Due to the National Advisory Committee on Order Granting Petitions for Leave to complexity of the protect.the FHWA Semiconductors Intervene,United StatttrUnited has decided to provide an additional The purpose of the National Advisory Kingdom Regional Airport Cass period is here0 e Comment by extended to September Committee on Semiconductors(MACS). Issued by the Department of Transportation 21.1990. is to devise and promulgate a national on the loth day of August 1900. BOIL FORTNUM i 11oNlomON CONTACT semiconductor strategy,including Conforming to the standards stated in Mr.Alexander Almeida.Protect research and development.The Order 90-7-39 that established this Manager.(817)499-2319•Transportation implementation of this strategy will Systems Center.55 Broadway,19th assure the continued leadership of the P °�ng �°petidoos for leave to Floor.Cambd MA 02142 United States in semiconductor intervene submitted by the following dam• technology.The Committee will meet on Pertles are genteel pursuant to the (23 B.SC.515:49 CFR 1.48) September 8.1990 at 1555 Wilson Blvd. authority conferred by 14 CFR 3g5.11(a): blued our A 17.199a suite 700,Arlington,Virginia.The The Ciry of Manchester Edward V.A.Kusry, proposed agenda is: The Georgia and Atlanta Parties(the State of Acting Chief Counsel.Federal Highway • 1,Press Briefing on the release of the Georgia.the City of Atlanta.Mansfield Administration. 8 Atlanta Intonational Airport,and the Capitol Investment Working Paper, Atlanta Chamber of Commerce) (FR Doc.90-19794 Filed a-21-9u 845 am) 2,Discussion of Working Group Actions. County of Wayne.Michigan ' RUC COOK++s-seas A portion of the September 0th The State of Michigan session will be closed to the public. .The Greater Pittsburgh International Airport , The briefing on some of the currentand the County of Allegheny.Pennsylvania Maritime Administration (The Pittsburgh Parties) activities of OSTP necessarily will involve discussion of malarial that is The Commonwealth of Virginia.Department Clangs Of Name and Removal From of Aviation Roster of Approved Trustee;Bank of formally classified In the interest of The Metropolitan Washington Airports New York national defense or for foreign policy Authority reasons.This is also true for a portion of Washington Airports Task Force Notice is hereby given pursuant to 40 the briefing on panel studies.As well,a The State of What Virginia Department of CFR part 721 that on October&1967.. portion of both of these briefings will Transportation. The Bank of New York 101 Barclay require discussion of internal personnel Petitions to the Department of Street.New York New York merged procedures of the Executive Office of Transportation for review of this order with and into the entity previously the President and information which,if shall be filed pursuant to 14 CFR UZI named Irving Trust Company.New prematurely disclosed.would within ten days after the date of service York New York As the sutvivor of said significantly fmstrate the of this order. merger.Irving Trust Company changed implementation of dedsiom made This order shall be effective and its name to The Bank of New York and requiring agency action.These portions become the action of the Department of continues on the Roster of Approved of the meeting will be dosed to the Transportation upon expiration of the Trustees under its new name.Therefore. public pursuant to 5 U.S.C.552 b.(c)(1). above period unless before that date a tha old entity named The Bank of New (2),and(9)(5). petition for review thereof is filed or the York Is removed from the Roster of Federal Register / For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission David D.Matthews, Acting Discolor.Division of Reac/orFrojosts- I/II,Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (Doc.90.19659 Filed 6.21-9n;6:a5 am) tautq Chat rea60w I i":r. r`^i".`TV .�-r i CV:`„ ... . ........J c'-' —5 — 15 UNITED STATES Pow 3µ{i MAIL NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION C :.'7:,c POSTA0t•MI PAID WASHINGTON, D.C. 20SES TO TIT= ::'Jt °"'"` flaw'me Do OFFICIAL BUSINESS PENALTY FOR PRIVATE USE. 1303 180631140866 1 16C BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CHAIRMAN WELD COUNTY GREELEY CO 80631 • r • "� Highway• s 5 , �n , , � ` Colorado Department of Highways r.,";‘ r‘Th 4201 E. Arkansas Ave. Denver, CO. 80222 701 For More information: 757-9228 'i90-35 AUGOST 30, 1990 CC 12-0076-03 I-76 FROK PECOS ST. TO BORON ST. I(cX) 076-1(1,14) IN ADAMS COUNTY New highway construction extending I-76 from Pecos St. to Huron St. in Adams county, work elements include grading, topsoil, seeding, mulching, aggregate base course, hot bituminous pavement, methane barrier vent system, bridge, drainage, concrete box culvert and striping. Number of bids: Three (3) Apparently successful bidder: 55,626,975 from Park Construction Company of Denver Calls for completion-within: 475 calendar days Preconstruction project manager: Jim Bumanglag Resident engineer: Gary Self, Golden CX 10-0075-25 BROAMO►Y IH ZNGLEMOOD CC 10-0075-26 CT 10-0075-28 Combined project to widen a bridge on Broadway in Englewood at Big Dry Creek south of Belleview Ave., consisting of hot bituminous pavement, drainage, concrete slope and ditch paving, seeding and mulching, in Arapahoe county. Project will be readvertised because there were fewer than three bidders and the low bid was more than two percent over the engineers' estimate. Colorado Revised Statute, section 43-1-111(8.5) C.R.S., as amended. MP 28-0040-20 O.S. 40 HEST OF STEAMBOAT SPRINGS Overlay project on U.S. 40 west of Steamboat Springs (Milepost 122.95 to milepost 127.35) , in Routt county. Number of bids: One (1) Apparently successful bidder: $242,610 from Elam Construction, Inc. • of Grand Junction Calls for completion within: 10 working days Preconstruction project manager: James E. Patton Resident engineer: Dale Pyle, Craig -over- C\\P\C\CI Highway gems/Amgust 30, 1990 Page 2 CC 99-2000-45 M0'ELLU S ITE PARK ROAD Building new roadway in Mueller State Park, located about 3.7 miles south of Divide extending 3.88 miles easterly from S.H. 67 into the park, consisting of hot bituminous pavement. Number of bids: Four (4) Apparently successful bidder: $272,330 from Broderick s Gibbons, Inc. of Pueblo Calls for completion within: 15 working_days Resident engineer: Duncan Watwood Celorado Springs A N T I C I P A T E D BID OPENINGS NEN: SWIM= 20, 9:30 a.m., major widening of 120th Avenue in Thornton and Northglenn for 1.1 miles east of washington Street, which includes grading, aggregate base course, hot bituminous pavement, drainage, storm sewer, sidewalk, curb and gutter, sound barrier fence, signalization, striping, topsoil, seeding, and mulching, in Adams county, project M 1754(3) . 9:45 as, minor widening, machine patching, and resurfacing two route segments near Stoneham, on S.H. 14 beginning 2 1/2 miles east of the community and extending three miles east, also on S.H. 71 for about 2.65 miles north of milepost 193.90, consisting of grading, aggregate base course, lime treated subgrade, hot bituminous pavement, drainage, fencing, striping, seeding and mulching, combined project FR(CX) 014-2(23) and MP 15-0071-10. • NEM: SEPTEMBER 2 9:_330 a-m•r minor widening and bridge replacement on U.S. 50 about five miles northwest of Delta, for a mile of roadway near . Deter Gulch and at a 117-ft.-long timber bridge over a draw, which includes grading, aggregate base course, hot bituminous pavement, plant mixed seal coat, concrete box culverts, drainage, guardrail, fencing and striping, FR(CX) 050-1(24) . PROTECTS AWARDED PROJECT: AWARDED TO: DATE: BRS 0059-(17) Carder, Inc. 7/26/90 bid CX 26-0059-12 51,394,621 8/22/90 award Bridge replacement Award Goals DBE 138 6 minor widening in Kit Committed DBE 5.68 Carson county on S.H. 59 -more- -- :.,,, Highway Ness/august 30, 1990 Page 3 CC 17-0050-17 HIM Construction, Inc. 7/26/90 bid Expanding ramps & parking $218,522 8/17/90 award at the B.S. 50 Port of Zero Goals Entry near Lamar HES 0003(33) K.E.C.I. Colorado, Inc. 7/26/90 bid Widening I-70B in Grand 5102,854 8/17/90 award Junction Zero Goals HOS 0006(55) K.E.C.I. Colorado, Inc. 8/2/90 bid Paving Colfax Ave. at $121,449 8/23/90 award Garrison St., Lakewood Award Goals DBE 198 Committed DBE 100% • IRD(B) 70-4(146) Centric-Jones Co. 8/9/90 bid Major widening at I-70 513,634,039 8/17/90 award . & I-25 in Denver Award Goals DBE 38 Committed DBE 8.07$ MP 51-0070-33 Asphalt Paving Co. 8/9/90 bid Resurfacing inside and east S598,450 8/17/90 award of the I-70 Eisenhower/ Award Goals DBE 128 Johnson Tunnels Committed DBE 35.86% SR(CX) 0079(8) Coulson Excavating Co.,Inc. 8/9/90 bid minor widening & resurfacing $1,587,280 8/17/90 award S.H. 79 south of Prospect Award Goals DBE 158 valley Committed DBE 19.27% I(CX) 76-1(130) Edward Kraemer & Sons, Inc. 8/9/90 bid New bridge construction $3,024,244 8/17/90 award on 70th Ave. over I-25, Award Goals DBE 58 Adams county Committed DBE 6.16 FC(CX) 285-4(44) Flatiron Structures Co. 8/9/90 bid CX 11-0070-23 $233,651 8/17/90 award Signs & Guardrail in Award Goals DBE 8% Jefferson county Committed DBE 20.5% CX 26-0059-10 Western Mobile-Northern, Inc.8/16/90 bid Resurfacing S.H. 59 $1,119,026 8/23/90 award south of Seibert Award Goals DBE 10$ Committed DBE 13.4$ CX 19-0034-06 Grasser Construction, Inc. 8/16/90 bid Signalizing & widening $242,322 8/24/90 award U.S. 385 at U.S. 34 in Award Goals DBE 10$ in Wray Committed DBE 23.828 -aver- Highway Hers/august 30, 1990 Page 4 • MP 99-6000-42 Colorado Barricade, Inc. 8/16/90 bid Pavement marking in d/b/a In-Line Traffic 8/22/90 award Metro Denver Marking.Co. Zero Goals DID TO D K I O W ? The United States has been DlSinvesting in transportation. Between,1967_.and 1987 highway miles traveled more than doubled, increasing 105 percent. During that same period highway spending, in constant dollars, increased only eight percent. D TOD 1[ H 011 7 Surface transportation spending in the United States is currently at the level of $81 billion a year, considering federal and state and local government budgets. But the aging system and added demands call for more. According to the American Association of State Highway b Transportation Officials, just maintaining the present system needs $95 billion a year ($80 billion for highways, $15 billion for transit) . To address congestion and growth, $117 billion would be needed each year ($101 billion for highways, $16 billion for transit) . DID T O V SHOW ? How do Americans travel? According to the American Association of State Highway a Transportation Officials, more than 80 percent Of all personal travel is by motor vehicle. Highway travel is rising four percent a year. Passenger air travel doubled since the late 19703 and is aaricted to rise 75 percent more by the year 2000. Commuting by public transit fell 28 percent from 1970 to 1980. Overall, transportation accounts for 20 percent of the Gross National Product. A separate nationwide survey published by the Federal Highway Administration regarding Personal. Travel modes found that privately owned vehicles are used for 86 percent of all personal travel. Air transportation (commercial and general aviation) accounts for 8.5 percent, and public transportation accounts for 2.8 percent. • rw t t +• ' ti e4C1 OFFICE OF COUNTY ATTORNEY 1.1 PHONE(3031 358.4000 EXT.4'O1 P.O.BOX 1946 GREELEY.COLORADO 80932 • COLORADO July 23, 1990 Town of Gilcrest 380 Eighth Street P. O. Box 128 Gilcrest, CO 80623 RE: H.S. 90-1104 Dear Mayor and Board Members of the Town of Gilcrest: Legislation concerning countv ordinance powers was enacted this last legislative session thanks, in part, to cooperation between the Colorado Municipal League, Special Districts Association, and Colorado Counties, Inc. The result is some enhancement of county ordinance powers along with provisions that may require municipal consent before County rules may be applied within municipalities and to allow County services and functions to be provided within municipalities, C.R.S. , Section 30-15-401(8) . C.R.S. , Section 25-1-507 (1) (h) , as added, allows for the collection of fees for certain environmental health services provided by the county health department from those receiving the service. (Attachment 1) The Weld County Environmental Health Division conducts a number of different functions within your municipality. Environmental Health functions are listed in Attachment "2" (Lot all may be occurring at this time within your municipality) . weld County is proposing to continue these services according to the schedule and is requesting your municipality's consent. The fees themselves will not be assessed to the municipality unless the service is provided directly to a municipal facility. Please take appropriate legislative action to authorize consent to th * provision of environmental health services within amour jurisdiction and have the mayor or appropriate official sign this letter as soon as possible and return to this office within thirty (30) days. ( 13 lJ` giiofrio Thank you for your attention to this matter. Please contact me with any questions you may have. Yours truly, • ,„%/f) ///104.24-44er—N.. Lee D. Morrison Assistant County Attorney Enc. xc: Board of County Commissioners Wes Potter, Environmental Health Director, Weld County Dr. Randy Gordon, Health Department Donald D. Warden, Director of Finance and Administration CONSENT TO THE PROVISIOF OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS HEREBY GIVEN. TOWN OF GILCREST By://7 ii 1 /( ii n7 Title: /7747 ' ) e''•5:/.3%l' • • I (15wll fganhatn Uhl n_: rch Sc. Rd. Greeley, CO 30631—.?031 3514\041 , , j:;\.:. • Es?-3 weld County Colorado Office of County Attorney \IELO C," cptG� P.O. Box 1948 croRNi, S Greeley. CO 80632 August 22 , 1990 RE : H. B. 90- 1104 Dear L. D. Morrison, The Board Members of the Town of Garden City had their monthly meeting August 21 . 1990. At that time . the board decided we do not have enough information to act on your request for the authorization. Several questions remain unanswered and we will need t0 meet with you before this issue can be resolved. If you are planning a meeting with other cities and towns in this area, we would like to attend. Thant; You /li Atek Mary Miller. Mayor ,I7 ., DI y 4� r -ZgnY ^I ^' � ��c`t1 :1 4'�'r• bb „'�bn T•r e ae .t,^� / �.^'"rU'`. `i i" F•".,. 1 1'(�`"C�.`. I ryi I \itilll��,. . Ae '%`- '1 li-�-'a.�,�- * A� a1\ l � r P,y� — .f ,`{ - OFFICE OF COUNTY ATTORNEY isr0 PHONE(3031358.4000 EXT .I9+ , P.O.SOX 194a GREELEY.COLORADO 30632 1111 D e COLORADO July 23, 1990 City of Fort Lupton 130 South McKinley Avenue P. O. Box 143 Fort Lupton, CO 80621 RE: R.B. 90-1104 Dear Mayor and Council Members of the City of Fort Lupton: Legislation concerning county ordinance powers was enacted this last legislative session thanks, in part, to cooperation between the Colorado Municipal League, Special Districts Association, and Colorado Counties, Inc. The result is some enhancement of county ordinance powers along with provisions that may require municipal consent before County rules may be applied within municipalities and to allow County services and functions to be provided within municipalities, C_R.S. , Section 30-15-401 (8) . C.R.S. , Section 25-1-507 (1) (h) , as added, allows for the collection of fees for certain environmental health services provided by the county health department from those receiving the service. (Attachment 1) The Weld County Environmental Health Division conducts a number of different functions within your municipality. Environmental Health functions are listed in Attachment "7." (not all muy be occurring at this time within your municipality) . Weld County is proposing to continue these services according to the schedule and is requesting your municipality's consent. The fees themselves will not be assessed to the municipality unless the service is provided directly to a municipal facility. Please take appropriate legislative action to authorize consent to the provision of environmental health services within, your jurisdiction and have the mayor or appropriate official sign this letter as soon as possible and return to this office within thirty (30) days. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Please contact me with any questions you may have. Yours truly, ; 27, • Lee D. Morrison Assistant County Attorney Enc. xc: Board of County Commissioners Wes Potter, Environmental Health Director, Weld County Dr. Randy Gordon, Health Department Donald D. Warden, Director of Finance and Administration CONSENT TO THE PROVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS HEREBY GIVEN. CITY OF FORT LUPTON By yiara#11 nwr�,...e‘ Title: >12!/ t1 ti f' OFFICE OF COUNTY ATTORNEY PHONE po m564000 cam 4:491 P.O. BOX 1948 GREELEY.COLORADO 80832 II ID e COLORADO July 23, 1990 City of Dacono 512 Cherry Street P. O. Box 186 Dacono, CO 80514 RE: H.B. 90-1104 Dear Mayor and Council Members of the City of Dacono: Legislation concerning county ordinance powers was enacted this last legislative session thanks, in part, to cooperation between the Colorado Municipal League, Special Districts Association, and Colorado Counties, Inc. The result is some enhancement of county ordinance powers along with provisions that may require municipal consent before County rules may be applied within municipalities and to allow County services and functions to be provided within municipalities, C.R.S. , Section 30-15-401(8) . C.R.S_ , Section 25-1-507 (1) (h) , as added, allows for the collection of fees for certain environmental health services provided by the county health department from those receiving the service. (Attachment 1) The Weld County Environmental Health Division conducts a number of different functions within your municipality_ Environmental Health functions are listed in Attachment "2" (not all may be occurring at this time within your municipality) . Weld County is proposing to continue these services according to the schedule and is requesting your municipality's consent. The fees themselves will not be assessed to the municipality unless the service is provided directly to a municipal facility. Please take appropriate legislative action to authorize consent to the provision of environmental health services within your jurisdiction and have the mayor or appropriate official sign this letter as soon as possible and return to this office within thirty (30) days. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Please contact me with any questions you may have. rj"7s truly, Lee D. Morrison Assistant County Attorney Enc. xc: Board of County Commissioners Wes Potter, Environmental Health Director, Weld County Dr. Randy Gordon, Health Department Donald D. Warden, Director of Finance and Administration CONSENT TO THE PROVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS HEREBY GIVEN. CITY OF DACONO A' 1 1 , • OFFICE OF COUNTY ATTORNEY eAktr, PHONE(3031366-4000 EXT.A t;t P.O.BOX 7946 GREELEY.COLORADO 80632 WI lk COLORADO July 23, 1990 Town of La Salle 119 Main Street P. O. Box 717 La Salle, CO 80645 RE: A.B. 90-1104 Dear Mayor and Board Members of the Town of La Salle: Legislation concerning county ordinance powers was enacted this last legislative session thanks, in part, to cooperation between the Colorado Municipal League, Special Districts Association, and Colorado Counties, Inc. The result is some enhancement o£ county ordinance powers along with provisions that may require municipal consent before County rules may be applied within municipalities and to allow County services and functions to be provided within municipalities, C.R.S. , Section 30-15-401 (8) . C.R.S. , Section 25-1-507 (1) (h) , as added, allows for the collection o£ fees for certain environmental health services provided by the county health department from those receiving the service. (Attachment 1) The Weld County Environmental Health Division conducts a number of different functions within your municipality. Environmental Health functions are listed in Attachment "3" (not all may be occurring at this time within your municipality) . Weld County is proposing to ccrtinue these services according to the schedule and is requesting your municipality' s consent. The fees themselves will not be assessed to the municipality unless the service is provided directly to a municipal facility. Please take appropriate legislative action to authorize consent to th4 provision of environmental health services within your jurisdiction and have the mayor or appropriate official sign this letter as soon as possible and return to this office within. thirty (30) days. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Please contact me with any questions you may have. Yours truly, 4/12 _. Lee D. Morrison Assistant County Attorney Enc. xc: Board of County Commissioners Wes Potter, Environmental Health Director, Weld County Dr. Randy Gordon, Health Department Donald D. Warden, Director of Finance and Administration CONSENT TO THE PROVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS HEREBY GIVEN. TOWN OF LA SALLE B;S:) Title: Mayor r OFFICE OF COUNTY ATTORNEY `� PHONE(303)358.6000 EXT.at5• P.O.80% 7968 GREELEY.COLORADO 80832 COLORADO July ^_4, 1990 City of Brighton 22 South Fourth Avenue Brighton, CO 80601 RE: H.B. 90-1104 Dear Mayor and Council Members of the City of Brighton: Legislation concerning county ordinance powers was enacted this last legislative session thanks, in part, to cooperation between the Colorado Municipal League, Special Districts Association, and Colorado Counties, Inc. The result is some enhancement of county ordinance powers along with provisions that may require municipal consent before County rules may be applied within municipalities and to allow County services and functions to be provided within municipalities, C.R.S. , Section 30-15-401 (8) . C.R.S. , Section 25-1-507 (1) (h) , as added, allows for the collection of fees for certain environmental health services provided by the county health department from those receiving the service. (Attachment 1) The weld County Environmental Health Division conducts a number of different functions within your municipality. Environmental Health functions are listed in Attachment "2" (rot all may be occurring at this time within your municipality) . Weld County is proposing to continue these services according to the schedule and is requesting your municipality's consent. The fees themselves will not be assessed to the municipality unless the service is provided directly to a municipal facility. "Please take appropriate legislative action to authorize consent to the provision of environmental health services within your jurisdiction and have the mayor or appropriate official sign this letter as soon as possible and return to this office within thirty (30) days. IF. . Thank you for your attention to this matter. Please contact me with any questions you may have. Yours 4uly, 20 Lee D. Mor son Assistant County Attorney Enc. xc: Board of County Commissioners Wes Potter, Environmental Health Director, Weld County Dr. Randy Gordon, Health Department Donald D. Warden, Director of Finance and Administration CONSENT TO THE PROVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS HEREBY GIVEN. CITY OF BRIGHTON By: � (,) Title: h Zw t rL) • TOWN OF PIERCE Post°era 60k 57 PIERCE.COLORADO 60630iL hU:. _ 'A:Rj I ' +� v':ELO COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE ;eld County�^Colorado Office of County Attorney Lee : . _ orrison Assistant County Attorney P.O. Box 194 Greeley , Colorado x0632 Dear :Ir. .•;orrison: The Town Board of the To:. . of Pierce rocoived your letter of July 23 , 1990, concerning H. B. 90-1104. The Board discussed the contents and are not clear about a number of items , one being the imposition of new fees for services performed by the : eld County Health Department. ';le currently are paying for these fees under an agreement made with the Health Depart.nen t, but it appears there will be additional fees. :Ir. Don Hoff, the Town's Attorney also called you and discussed this .matter. • Since we would like clarification on some o: these items the :Iayor and some of the Trustees • would lice to meet with you or the County Commissioners to discuss this .matter. before we sign the letter authorizing consent to the provis- ions of environmental health services within our jurisdiction. Please notify me of a convenient date. Sincerely. Lois Souther Town Clerk a RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS MINUTES BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO SEPTEMBER 10, 1990 TAPE $90-32 The Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, met in regular session in full conformity with the law and bylaws of said Board at the regular place of meeting in the Weld County Centennial Center, Greeley, Colorado, September 10, 1990, at the hour of 9:00 A.M. ROLL CALL: The meeting was called to order by the Chairman and on roll call the following members were present, constituting a quorum of the members thereof: Commissioner Gene R. Brantner, Chairman Commissioner George Kennedy, Pro-Tem Commissioner Constance L. Harbert Commissioner C.W. Kirby - Excused Commissioner Gordon E. Lacy Also present: Weld County Attorney, Thomas 0. David Acting Clerk to the Board, Tommie Antuna MINUTES: Commissioner Kennedy moved to approve the minutes of the Board of County Commissioners meeting of September 5, 1990, as printed. Commissioner Harbert seconded the motion, and it carried with Commissioner Lacy abstaining because he was excused from said meeting. ADDITIONS: There were no additions to today's agenda. CONSENT AGENDA: Commissioner Kennedy moved to approve the consent agenda as printed. Commissioner Lacy seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. COMMISSIONER COORDINATOR REPORTS: There were no reports at today's meeting. WARRANTS: Don Warden presented the following warrants for approval by the Board: General fund $331,340.61 Social Services 203,171.25 Handwritten warrants: Payroll 92,803.24 Commissioner Kennedy moved to approve the warrants as presented by Mr. Warden. Commissioner Harbert seconded the motion which carried unanimously. 2.400/. BUSINESS: NEW: CONSIDER PURCHASE or SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN CHERYL DIVINE AND 'EMPLOYMENT SERVICES AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN: Alvina Derrera, representing the Department of Human Resources, said Ms. Divine is to provide eight Job Club sessions. Commissioner Kennedy moved to approve said Agreement and authorize the Chairman to sign. Seconded by Commissioner Lacy, the motion carried unanimously. CONSIDER RESOLUTION RE: DECLARE CERTAIN EQUIPMENT AS SURPLUS PROPERTY; Commissioner Lacy moved to approve said Resolution. The motion, which was seconded by Commissioner Kennedy, carried unanimously. CONSIDER RESOLUTION RE: CANCEL UNCOLLECTIBLE AMBULANCE ACCOUNTS: Commissioner Kennedy moved to approve this Resolution. Commissioner Harbert seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. CONSIDER RESOLUTION RE: CANCEL GENERAL FUND WARRANTS FOR AUGUST, 1990: Commissioner Harbert moved to approve said Resolution. Seconded by Commissioner Lacy, the motion carried unanimously. CONSIDER SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 77-C, IN MATTER OF REPEAL AND RE-ENACTMENT WITH AMENDMENTS OF ORDINANCE NO. 77-8, AMBULANCE SERVICES RULES AND REGULATIONS: This item was held over to later in the meeting. PLANNING: CONSIDER RESOLUTION RE: VIOLATIONS OF THE BUILDING CODE ORDINANCE - ANDERSON; SLAVIN; STRAIGHT; AND RICHARDSON: Commissioner Lacy moved to approve this Resolution authorizing the County Attorney to proceed with legal action against Carol O. Anderson; Robert S. Slavin; Florence Straight and Gerald A. Straight; and Ron Richardson for violations of the Weld County Building Code Ordinance. Commissioner Kennedy seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. Let the record reflect that the following item under New Business was considered at this time. CONSIDER SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 77-C, IN MATTER OF REPEAL AND RE-ENACTMENT WITH AMENDMENTS OF ORDINANCE NO. 77-B, AMBULANCE SERVICES RULES AND REGULATIONS: Commissioner Lacy moved that this be read into the record by title only. Seconded by Commissioner Harbert, the motion carried unanimously. Tom David, County Attorney, read the title of Ordinance No. 77-C into the record. There was no public comment offered concerning this Ordinance. Commissioner Lacy moved to approve the second reading of said Ordinance. Commissioner Kennedy seconded the motion which carried unanimously. Commissioner Lacy now reported on the Boards and Commissions Interim Committee testimony which he was requested to give at the hearing conducted on September 5. He said his testimony addressed the reasons CCI members feel there should be local officials, and specifically county commissioners, on the commissions which are appointed by the Legislature and the Governor. Minutes - September 10, 1990 Page 2 RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES: The Resolutions were presented and signed as listed on the consent agenda. There were no Ordinances. Let the minutes reflect that the above and foregoing actions were attested to and respectfully submitted by the Acting Clerk to the Board. There being no further business, this meeting was adjourned at 9:10 A.M. APPROVED: n 1 ATTEST: i i BO F COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ��//�� LINTY, COLORADO Weld County Clerk to the and it AttSt Gene R. Brantner,/Chairman By, i /' � r _ k. �C puty Clerk to th! Board oo a Kennedy, Pro-Tem � 41W Constance L. Harbe EXCUSED C.W. Kir . La Minutes - September 10, 1990 Page 3 tett MEMORACID M 1111111e. Commissioner Kirby September 7, 1990 7o Door /j� COLORADO From George Goodell, Director of Road and Bridge �([��ff Road & Bridge Report August 31 - September 6, 1990 &gist: TRUCKING Graveled the following Weld County Roads: Weld County Road 38 between Weld County Roads 9 and 13 Weld County Road 34 between Weld County Roads 17 and 19 Weld County Road 24.5 between Weld County Roads 9.75 and 9 Graveled approximately 333.25 miles to date - 95% of 350 mile goal. Hauled 6 tandem loads of gravel for driveways; 90 tons. Hauled 144 belly dump loads of gravel for upgrade to pave the Hog Farm Road; 3,600 tons. Hauled 2 belly dump loads of gravel for culvert cover; 50 tons. Hauled 4 belly dump loads of gravel for washes; 100 tons. Hauled 142 tandem loads and 68 end dump loads of asphalt for paving. Hauled 6.183.75 tons o£ gravel. Note: 4-day week due to holiday on Monday, September 3rd. MINING Equipment Used: One dozer is working at the Peters Pit. One dozer is working at the Hall Pit. One dozer is working part-time at the Hall Pit- One dozer is working at the Thomas Pit. Two scrapers are working at the Hall Pit. The cone rock crusher is working at the Peters Pit. The screen is working at the Thomas Pit. Equipment Not Used: One dozer is at the Giesert Pit. Commissioner Kirby Road & Bridge Report 08/31/90-09/06/90 Page 2 MINING (CONTINUED) Dirt Hauled for Reclamation Year-To-Date: Giesert Pit a2 - 54,390 yards Material Stockpiled (to be crushed) Year-To-Date: Giesert Pit 112 - 87,400 tons Pit Run Gravel Hauled to Building Site South of Fuel Site Year-To-Date: - 5,610 tons Overburden Removed Year-To-Date: Wilson Pit - 9,840 yards Overburden Removed Year-To-Date: Thomas Pit - 27,620 yards Overburden Removed Year-To-Date: Peters Pit - 8,340 yards Overburden Removed Year-To-Date: Hall Pit - 57,390 yards Material Crushed: Hokestra 112 - 5,199 tons Giesert Pit - 152,238 tons Peters Pit - 74,429 tons Material Screened: Koenig Pit - 96,530 tons Thomas Pit - 94,776 tons TOTAL CRUSHED AND SCREENED YEAR-TO-DATE: 423,172 tons BRIDGE WCB 84/21B: Bridge Replacement - 35% complete WCB 53/42A: Bridge Replacement - 87. complete WCB 87/42A (Masters Bridge): Redeck - (2 men with roller and packer) - 100Z complete Commissioner Kirby Road & Bridge Report 08/31/90-09/06/90 Page 3 BRIDGE (CONTINUED) Tree Trimming: WCR 114 west of WCR 77 WCR 392 at WCR 84 WCR 29 north of WCR 46 - west and south Ditch Work: WCR 15.5 north of WCR 50.5 - west and south, 3/4 mile, new ditch WCR 52 east of WCR 15 - north and south, 2/10 mile WCR 13 north of WCR 52 - east and south, 1/10 mile WCR 50 east of WCR 15 - north and south, 1/10 mile Asphalt for Bridges: Year-To-Date Total: 478.00 Tons MAINTENANCE Routine maintenance. MAINTENANCE-SUPPORT Signing - 38 Striping - 69 Miles Cattle Guard Maintenance - 1 Gravel Hauling - 40 Tons; Stockpiled - 24 Tons Culvert Cleaning and Repair - 4 Miscellaneous - 3 Commissioner Kirby Road & Bridge Report 08/31/90-09/06/90 Page 4 MAINTENANCE-SUPPORT (CONTINUED) Patching Totals Year-To-Date: Laydown Machine (Road and Bridge): 86,215.33 Tons Laydown Machine (Engineering): 1,421.99 Tons Hand Patch (Road and Bridge): 1,726.49 Tons Hand Patch (Engineering): 113.09 Tons Crushed Rock (Road and Bridge): 1,224.00 Tons Crushed Rock (Engineering): 156.00 Tons Cold Mix (Road and Bridge): 36.86 Tons Culvert Installations: WCR 18 between WCR 73 and WCR 75.5 Size - 40' X 18" Arch Culvert 100% Complete WCR 14 at WCR 61 Size - 80' X 18" Round Culvert 100% Complete GG/mw:090690 cc: Commissioner Harbert Dave Becker, Assistant Director Road & Bridge Report Pile Clerk to the Board RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AGENDA Wednesday, September 12, 1990 Tape #90-33 ROLL CALL: Gene R. Brantner, Chairman George Kennedy, Pro-Tem Constance L. Harbert C.W. Kirby Gordon E. Lacy MINUTES: Approval of minutes of September 10, 1990 (Commissioner Kirby excused) ADDITIONS TO AGENDA: None APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA: DEPARTMENT HEADS AND 1) Gary McCabe, Ambulance Director ELECTED OFFICIALS: COUNTY FINANCE OFFICER: 1) Warrants (Donald Warden) BIDS: 1) Present 15-passenger vans - Human Resources Department BUSINESS: OLD: 1) Consider protest concerning mowing services by Pest and Weed Department - Eichler (cont. from 9/5/90) NEW: 1) Consider Purchase of Services Agreement between FENWC and Mark R. Smith and authorize Chairman to sign 2) Consider Purchase of Services Agreement between Fait= and Christopher Wood and authorize Chairman to sign 3) Consider setting preliminary hearing date for local improvement district - Basswood Avenue 4) Consider request to preadvertise Amended SUP - Roggen Feedlot/Ressee 5) Consider Resolution re: Cancel Payroll Fund Warrants for August, 1990 PLANNING: 1) Consider Resolution re: Building Code and Zoning Violations - Jungla, Rucker, and Buzzard; Fiechtner; Stewart; and Lyons 2) ZPMH #1679 - Martinez 3) ZPMH #1680 - Martinez CONSENT AGENDA APPOINTMENTS: Sep 14 - Community Corrections 12:00 NOON Sep 17 - Work Session 10:00 AM Sep 18 - E911 Telephone Authority Board 12:00 NOON Sep 18 - Retirement Board 2:15 PM Sep 18 - Airport Authority 3:00 PM Sep 20 - Placement Alternatives Commission 12:00 NOON HEARINGS: Sep 12 - Special Review Permit, Livestock confinement operation (1,500 cattle) , horse boarding and training facility (150 head) , and tack and feed store, Joy A. Jefferson (cont. from 8/29/90) 10:00 AM Sep 12 - Change of Zone, Pup (Planned Unit Development) to A (Agricultural) , City of Longmont 10:00 AM Sep 12 - Change of Zone, A (Agricultural) and C-3 (Commercial) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) with C-3 and I-3 uses, Flatiron Structures/Azalea Farms 10:00 AM Sep 19 - Change of Ownership of Special Review Permit, Children's Shelter Home in A (Agricultural) Zone District, Chester Price 10:00 AM Sep 19 - Certificate of Designation, Sludge composting facility in the A (Agricultural) Zone District, City of Longmont 10:00 AM Sep 19 - Certificate of Designation, Roggen Disposal, Inc. 10:00 AM Oct 3 - Special Review Permit, Home business (plumbing shop) in the A (Agricultural) Zone District, George W., III, and Barbara J. Corman 10:00 AM Oct 3 - Amended Special Review Permit and Certificate of Designation, Biomedical waste incineration facility, Jamison Tool, Inc., and Wixco Services, Inc. 10:00 AM Oct 3 - Amended Special Review Permit and Certificate of Designation, Tire landfill, storage, and recycling facility, Tire Mountain, Inc. 10:00 AM Oct 10 - Special Review Permit, Agricultural service establishment, James and Janice Schmidtbauer 10:00 AM Oct 10 - Special Review Permit, Expansion of existing church in R-2 (Duplex Residential) Zone District, Mount Calvary Lutheran Church 10:00 AM Nov 7 - Show Cause Hearing, Richard Hessee (cont. from 6/29/90) 10:00 AM COMMUNICATIONS: 1) State Department of Health agenda for September 19, 1990: and Notices of Public Rulemaking Hearings 2) State Department of Highways Newsletter 090-36 3) State Board of Assessment Appeals re: Hoyman vs. Board 4) State Division of Labor - Notice of Hearing re: Ramos RESOLUTIONS: * 1) Authorize County Attorney to proceed with legal action - Building Code and Zoning violations * 2) Approve cancellation of Payroll fund warrants for August, 1990 * Signed at this meeting wednesday, September 12, 1990 RESOLUTION RE: AUTHORIZATION FOR THE WELD COUNTY ATTORNEY TO PROCEED WITH LEGAL ACTION AGAINST CERTAIN PARTIES FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE WELD COUNTY BUILDING CODE ORDINANCE AND THE WELD COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority o£ administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Weld County Department of Planning Services has referred certain violations of the Weld County Building Code Ordinance and the Weld County Zoning Ordinance to the County Attorney's Office, and WHEREAS, those persons in violation of the Weld County Building Code Ordinance and the Weld County Zoning Ordinance are Vincent and Irene Jungle, Junita L. Rucker, and Earl and Kathy Buzzard; Douglas R. Fiechtner; James and Betty Stewart; and Carl and Susan Lyons, and WHEREAS, despite efforts by the Planning staff to resolve said matters, the violations have not been corrected, and WHEREAS, the Board deems it necessary to bring legal action against those individuals as hereinabove named to correct said violations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners o£ Weld County, Colorado, that Thomas O. David, Weld County Attorney, be, and hereby is, authorized to proceed with legal action against Vincent and Irene Jungle, Junita L. Rucker, and Earl and Kathy Buzzard; Douglas R. Fiechtner; James and Betty Stewart; and Carl and Susan Lyons to remedy the violations of the Weld County Building Code Ordinance and the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, and any other persons occupying the properties, any persons claiming an interest in the properties, and any persons acting in active concert with the identified parties. 900818 PLoCaa7 ee : f; 2,A; V,.0c (4°-) Page 2 RE: BUILDING CODE AND ZONING VIOLATIONS The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 12th day of September, A.D. , 1990. n A�' BOAR OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: /, / l�V �/U � WEL OUNTY, COLORADO Weld County Clerk to the Board /l ne R. Brant er, C airman cBy_: / • . r Ge ge Kenney,Pro-Tem eputy Clerk t e Board tritnie. APPROVED AS TO FORM: ohs an a L. Ha ert C. . Ci C my Attorney Go . L 900818 '1444' MEMORAn®um To Board of County Commissioners osn September 6, 1990 COLORADO From Department of Planning Services S nor Legal Action Authorization The Department of Planning Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners authorize the Weld County Attorney to proceed with legal action against the following parties for violations of the Weld County Building Code Ordinance. Building Code Ordinance Violations: BCV-1515 BCV-1515 Vincent & Irene Jungle and Earl & Kathy Buzzard Junta L. Rucker 16103 Weld County 6 15661 Duquesne Circle Ft. Lupton, CO 80621 Brighton, CO 80601 BCV-1499 Douglas R. Fiechtner 6299 Weld County Road 32 Longmont, CO 80501 The Department of Planning also recommends that the County Attorney be authorized to proceed with legal action against any other persons occupying the properties, any persons claiming an interest in the properties, and any persons acting in active concert with the identified parties. Copies of the violation materials are available at the Department of Planning Services' office or the Weld County Attorney's office. 900818 Alt 6' MEMORAnDUM To Board of County Commissioners om, September 7, 1990 COLORADO From Department of Planning Services 1j�j/J Sueper._ Legal Action Authorization The Department of Planning Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners authorize the Weld County Attorney to proceed with legal action against the following parties for violations of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. Zoning Ordinance violations: v1-1592 James and Betty Stewart Carl and Susan Lyons 7166 Harold Street 15296 Coleman Avenue Port Lupton, CO 80621 Fort Lupton, CO 80621 The Department o£ Planning also recommends that the County Attorney be authorized to proceed with legal action against any other persons occupying the properties, any persons claiming an interest in the properties, and any persons acting in active concert with the identified parties. Copies of the violation materials are available at the Department of Planning Services' office or the Weld County Attorney's office. RESOLUTION RE: APPROVAL OF CANCELLATION OF PAYROLL FUND WARRANTS WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority o£ administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, certain Payroll Fund Warrants in the total amount of $1,329.15, have been issued in error or the amounts for which they were drawn have otherwise been changed, and WHEREAS, a list of the specific Warrant numbers, dates, names, and amounts is on file with the Accounting Department, and WHEREAS, the Board deems it advisable to approve the cancellation of said Warrants. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that those Payroll Fund Warrants for the month of August, 1990, in the amount of $1,329.15, be, and the same hereby are, cancelled and held for naught. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 12th day of September, A.D. , 1990. BO OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: �V (/(/((iZGC1%11 wEL UNTTY, COLORADO Weld County Clerk to the Board At teenee��-Rte..-Bra .-tne�r, C airman Geo ge Kenne yd , Pro-Ted Deputy Clerk to the Board 7 � APPROVED AS T FORM: Constance L. Hare t C > j C.W. A(� - CC my Attorney � � Cord LA'cy" 900823 Ec000l aatt. f& MEmORAnDUM NoeTo CLEREt TO THE HOARD on 9111/90 COLORADO From ACCOL1NTZIG DEPARTMENT Subject: PAYROLL VOID 41,I2 NTS FOR THE MONTH r WILL YOU PLEASE &ITER A RESOLUTION FOR THE FOLLOWING WARRANT CANCELLATIONS FOR PAYROLL FUND; FOR THE MONTH OF AUGUST IN TEE Noun OF ' $1,329.15 TEAM YOU, l" k v�A� . S� .i 900823 +i,‘Nt MEMORAnDUM Gene R. Br, Chairman T, County Board of County Commissioners on, September 12, 1990 �t� COLORADO From Walter J. Speckman, Executive Director, Human Resources Wa &object Purchase of Service Agreement between Weld County Division of Human Resources' Family Educational- Network and Mark R. Smith, D.D.S. Enclosed for Board approval is a Purchase of Service Agreement between Weld County Division of Human Resources' Family Educational Network (FENWC) and Mark R. Smith, D.D.S. This Agreement outlines that FENWC will reimburse Mark R. Smith, D.D.S., $40.00 per child up to a maximum of ten (10) children. The term of this Agreement is October 1, 1990 through June 30, 1991. If you have any questions, please telephone Tere Keller at 356-0600. September 12, 1990 MEMORANDUM TO: Clerk to the Boa FR: Jane Orton RE: Purchase of Serv' a Agreement between Weld County Division of Human Resources' Family Educational Network and Mark R. Smith, D.D.S. Enclosed for Board approval are three (3) copies of a Purchase of Service Agreement as stated above. Please return two (2) copies once they have been Signed. 1f you have any questions. please telephone Tere Keller at 356-0600. goo837 NR0043 PURCHASE OF SERVICE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 12th day of September 1990, by and between the County of Weld, State of Colorado, by and through the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, on behalf of the Weld County Division of Human Resources' Family Educational Network of Weld County, hereinafter referred to as "FENWC," and Mark R. Smith, O.D.S. , hereinafter referred to as "Dentist." • WITNESSETH In consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, FENWC and the Dentist agree as follows: 1. FENWC agrees to arrange transportation for FENWC children to the appointed dentist as needed. This. will enable parents to be transported with their children to attend their child's scheduled appointment at the designated Dentist's office. 2. The Dentist shall provide prophylaxis therapy and application of topical fluoride for each FENWC child. The Dentist agrees to provide all restoration and/or extractions as he deems necessary on each referred child. 3. FENWC agrees to reimburse the Dentist $40.00 per child for these services up to a maximum of ten (10) children. 4. FENWC will not be charged for those children covered by Public Assistance. Medicaid numbers shall be provided at the time of the appointment and billing will be sent to the appropriate agency by the Dentist. 5. For services not reimbursed by FENWC, the amount will be designated as In-Kind Contribution to the FENWC Program on behalf of the Dentist. 6. The term of the Agreement is October 1, 1990 through June 30, 1991. 7. The Dentist and FENWC mutually agree that this Agreement will terminate on June 30, 1991. 8. The Dentist assures the following that: a. He is an independent contractor and neither he nor his officers and employees become employees of Weld County, and therefore are not entitled to any employee benefits as Weld County employees, as the result of the execution of this Agreement. b. Weld County, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, its officers and employees, shall not be held liable for injuries or damages caused by any negligent acts or omissions of the Dentist, or his employees, volunteers, or agents while performing Dentist's duties as described in this Agreement. The Dentist shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless Weld County, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, its officers and employees for any loss occasioned as a result of the performance of this Agreement by the Dentist, his employees, volunteers, and agents. c. No portion of this Agreement shall be deemed to constitute a waiver of any immunities the parties or their officers or employees may possess, nor shall any portion of this Agreement be deemed to have created a duty of care with respect to any persons not a party to this Agreement. 4 d. No portion of this Agreement shall be deemed to create an obligation on the part of the County of Weld, State of Colorado, to expend funds not otherwise appropriated in each succeeding year. e. No officer, member, or employee of Weld County, and no member of their governing bodies shall have any pecuniary interest, direct, or indirect in the approved Agreement or the proceeds thereof. 9. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, or. phrase of this Agreement is for any reason held or decided to be unconstitutional . such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions. The parties hereto declare that they would have entered into this Agreement and each and every section, subsection, paragraph, sentence. clause, and phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, or phrases might be declared unconstitutional or invalid. 10. All modifications to this Agreement shall be in writing and signed by both parties. 11. This Agreement may be terminated by either party giving a thirty (30) day written notice to the other party. If funding to FENWC should cease, this Agreement will be terminated immediately. If FENWC funding should be reduced, this Agreement will be renegotiated immediately to reflect funding changes. 12. This Agreement constitutes the entire understanding between the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof, and may not be changed or modified except as stated in Paragraph ten (10) herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties above hereunto placed their hands as of the date first written above. WELD CO NTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS DENTIST Ge eR Brant e a rmantit a dRSlni� �. �.5 W\ WELD COUNTY DIVISION OF HUMAN ATTEST: hdebduein RESOURCES WELD COUNTY CLERK TO THE BOARD Waiter J peckman BY' Executive Director a uty erc to t oard i �g`� MEMORAnDum WineCountyGene R. r, Chairman ro Board of County Commissioners o,<, September 12, 1990 // COLORADO From Walter J. Speckman, Executive Director, Human Resources Vat Sub;ecr:Purchase of Service Agreement between Weld County Division of Human Resources' Family Educational Network and Christopher Wood, -D.D.S Enclosed for Board approval is a Purchase of Service Agreement between Weld County Division of Human Resources' Family Educational Network (FENWC) and Christopher Wood, D.D.S. This Agreement outlines that FENWC will reimburse Christopher Wood, D.D.S., $40.00 per child up to a maximum of ten (10) children. The term of this Agreement is October 1, 1990 through June 30, 1991. If you have any questions, please telephone Tere Keller at 356-0600. September 12, 1990 MEMORANDUM T0: Clerk to the Board _ J FR: Jane Orton RE: Purchase of Service Agreement between Weld County Division of Human Resources' Family Educational Network and Christopher Wood, D.D.S. Enclosed for Board approval are three (3) copies of a Purchase of Service Agreement as stated above. Please return two (2) copies once they have been signed. If you have any questions, please telephone Tere Keller at 356-0600. 900838 H/e00�3 PURCHASE OF SERVICE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 12th day of September 1990, by and between the County of Weld, State of Colorado, by and through the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, on behalf of the Weld County Division of Human Resources' Family Educational Network of Weld County, hereinafter referred to as "FENWC," and Christopher Wood, D.D S. , hereinafter referred to as "Dentist." WITNESSETH In consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, FENWC and the Dentist agree as follows: I. FENWC agrees to arrange transportation for FENWC children to the appointed dentist as needed. This will enable parents to be transported with their children to attend their child's scheduled appointment at the designated Dentist's office. 2. The Dentist shall provide prophylaxis therapy and application of topical fluoride for each FENWC child. The Dentist agrees to provide all restoration and/or extractions as he deems necessary on each referred child. 3. FENWC agrees to reimburse the Dentist $40.00 per child for these services up to a maximum of ten (10) children. 4. FENWC will not be charged for those children covered by Public Assistance. Medicaid numbers shall be provided at the time of the appointment and billing will be sent to the appropriate agency by the Dentist. 5. For services not reimbursed by FENWC, the amount will be designated as In-Kind Contribution to the FENWC Program on behalf of the Dentist. 6. The term of the Agreement is October 1, 1990 through June 30, 1991. 7. The Dentist and FENWC mutually agree that this Agreement will terminate on June 30, 1991. 8. The Dentist assures the following that: a. He is an independent contractor and neither he nor his officers and employees become employees of Weld County, and therefore are not entitled to any employee benefits as Weld County employees, as the result of the execution of this Agreement. b. Weld County, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, its officers and employees, shall not be held liable for injuries or damages caused by any negligent acts or omissions of the Dentist, or his employees, volunteers, or agents while performing Dentist's duties as described in this Agreement. The Dentist shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless Weld County, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, its officers and employees for any loss occasioned as a result of the performance of this Agreement by the Dentist, his employees, volunteers, and agents. c. No portion of this Agreement shall be deemed to constitute a waiver of any immunities the parties or their officers or employees may possess, nor shad any portion of this Agreement be deemed to have created a duty of care with respect to any persons not a party to this Agreement. d. No portion of this Agreement shall be deemed to create an obligation on the part of the County of Weld, State of Colorado, to expend funds not otherwise appropriated in each succeeding year. e. No officer, member, or employee of Weld County, and no member of their governing bodies shall have any pecuniary interest, direct, or indirect in the approved Agreement or the proceeds thereof. 9. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Agreement is for any reason held or decided to be unconstitutional , such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions. The parties hereto declare that they would have entered into this Agreement and each and every section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, and phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, or phrases might be declared unconstitutional or invalid. 10. All modifications to this Agreement shall be in writing and signed by both parties. 11. This Agreement may be terminated by either party giving a thirty (30) day written notice to the other party. If funding to FENWC should cease, this Agreement will be terminated immediately. If FENWC funding should be reduced, this Agreement will be renegotiated immediately to reflect funding changes. 1 12. This Agreement constitutes the entire understanding between the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof, and may not be changed or modified except as stated in Paragraph ten (10) herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties above hereunto placed their hands as of the date first written above. WELD 0 NTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS DENTIST )( 1u/tat Accidd 57 G ne . rant er, a rman Christopher Wood, D.D.S. WELD COUNTY DIVISION OF HUMAN ATTEST:i�� RESOURCES /�/�V�V°°°° WELD COUNTY CLERK TO THE BOARD a er peckman B t pityP1 Execut ve Director D Clerk to thh BoarC • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • COIL m g CO g m m co 2 D 9 w w tr W w w w W C A '17 VI to O (71 N N a an a A N .. Y. M M 1• Y 1M I• t: a O V V V V V V V V in 2 O 0 A Si A N + Ir N A H ro c r n a C A •• A a 2 D b 2 m r -4 ac A 2 M z n M = M M OW ,b 0 r r O O M O b O • M A M M o • H z z e M •• V o O is C a .~ A 2 m 0 • Z I- O •• O L 3 C Z 0 w 1 • s v z ft to a 2 H m w a 2 r O 2 r z • • n • o r n c v • •• z a • X 2 a = •1 r • •• H a z r z o n Az M • • O z M v n T za •. .I •, n ` C o z •cr C nc 2 o �a2 to M •• M •I M n •. NK A M V.-4 4 M O A H •• N K M •• nl N NNNN N N N N N N N N N N N N N b a 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 n a, r a• ♦ + r 00 a ♦ • a• + r a' MO o r +• r r r r z C V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V Z. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 II 1 I v A A A A A A A A A A00th 000 A P 6 ✓ V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V m 2 •- r to. r r r r L C O 0 0 0 0 O O O O 0000000 O O 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 'Ow A AAA A V S A A A P A A A A A A A A M M m m m m m m M M M M M M M M M m m O A O 0000 0 0 n a 0000000 0 0 t_ I 1 n II 11 II 11 b O 1 1 if it is u it a s I I 11 11 II 11 11 O N 1 I t1 it it it u Mr. t 1 u u n u n t 1 11 11 11 n n .. •• I I 11 11 It 11 11 r I 1 II 11 11 11 n a s O 1 1 II II 11 ►• 11 11 i A 10 N NNNN IN N IN N 11 N N 11 N N II W a• ♦ w •• O u o- II N N II NN N OA \ N NNNN IN N IN N 11 N N II N N 0O 0000000 ON N II N N C a •• • • • • • 1 • • 1 • • 11 • • 11 • a 11 • • • • • • • • 11 • • II • • T 2 •• O OM NO 10 O 10 N lath O 11 N N 11 N 0000000 11 co O 11 O A i V V. 00000 10 O IC O 11 O O 11O O n O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I t O 0 11 O O •D 1 1 11 11 II 11 11 •• O 0 • • • • • 0 • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • ; • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • m W coN m m co m coN z A 9 4I u 41 41 41 V 4I 4: C A m N a N 0 0 N VI 0 1 2 N 1 .. .. Sr •. .. •- ^ m a o m CO a CO CO o CO .1 m z o a N 4% w N .. o .0 z -1 2 a al C m n z z a ✓ a r •C •• •• m C A a -1 y m -1 n r z t sr 1. = o m a c w m N N Z a O r S N -I 73 an � In i m n m 2 � m a z a o o a 2 z m •. r x 20 n •. .a m r 2 a o n m r r x m 17 mt 1.4 b b r• w >z r -1 z -0 x n x n n z r m -1 N a z A A z -/ oam m "nar z zo •• -1 •• n 2 0 r 0 C C 0 m C 2 O '3/4.aZ CO •. •• w M mn •- am 72 R. \ -1 *O PI O 2 r r r IS r r r r r r '71 N N NNNNNNN N N N N N N N N O a 1 1 ' Mill 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 n ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ O n ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ m 0 41 N NNNNNNN N N ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ M C U P N Mtn N N N P {11 N V V V .1 V V —1 .2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 -I P a a s PPP P P a a a P a P a s a V V 14 W W W {J W 41 W V V V V V V V C0 2 •• h CO O CO CO 0 CO CO CO r w r •. r 1+ P. L C 0 P .I V .I V V V V V P O O O O O O 2 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 � 6 n m m z 2, 2022 xz A m a 2 2 m m m m m m O 2 n r r 11 11 11 II II 11 I n I -2 O II 11 II 11 11 11 I 11 a a 11 11 11 it U II I 11 O H 11 II 11 it n II I 11 Cr m II a 11 T 11 11 I II II II 11 II 11 11 I 11 •• •• 11 II r- r11 II II 11 1 11 = II 11 •• •. II II II 11 I II 9 D 0 11 II W W 11 N •• 11 11 11 1 11 r 0 A 40 11 N N 11 0 co 11 U O V .1 ♦ .I V P 11 W 41 II V V II N N 1 ON NNN 00 NN O A ••3/4 HD O it r l- no N .I .I 0 V V OD II N N II O O 11 O O IN NNN II V N N C 9 tor II • • II • • II • • • • • • • • 11 • • 11 • • II • • 1 • • • • 11 • • • 2 '_' I- 11 O O 11 OD a II •-• CO 0 10 a .i 10 ♦ 11 O O 11 O O 11 0 O I IT NO 01 11 0 I 00 N r \ 11 O O ow r 11 O 0000000 HO O HO O 110 O IC 000 11 0 1 00 0 II II II ll 11 11 1 11 1 N 0 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 0 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • O . W W W W W W W W W W C 70 b N Ir N 0 t71 N 0 01 O to X V N r r .- is.. r � 1. •. r .. CO a O N 10 b .0 b O •0 CO CO m rn 2 O P to A W N •• O O CD V Z •i .0 H N o r r r r S h a z IR a A o m a a C C 2 a s r •t O O z z 2 •t -4 < D H r N 2 rn O N w t. rn ✓ — y r < it. z r rn r rn rn .. N r tl L � Z 70 O yi O 0 • O a m 2 2 a m 2 t_ A is •• a L. X m a z a 7c le ✓ Y m 'oil b M N m a O c x r n z m to c r m O o z -1 m m 7D 2 Z w rn N •1 A a 2 70 •t O A 2 •t O O O aZ N A A Z 0 MI IT T a r Z O w •4 .N n 22 O Z O C C .0 rn C 5 \02 CO Or •. Pit .r M n 1. y < A R d m 0 7 I.• H 1.. Is. r r r r I. t. 17 N N N N N N N N N N 0 a 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 n a a a a a a a a A A C n A A A A A A A A A A rn 0 W W W W W W W W W W ro C W W W W W W W W W W < 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 .t P P P a a P a a a a O ✓ V V V V V V V V V m 2 H r r r r 1.. I. L C O O O O O O O O O O R 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 9 m n n n n n n n n h n A in N N N N N N N N N N O A O O O O O O O O O O t. n n n n o n n n n n 11 11 11 11 II II 11 11 It S O tt 11 11 11 11 11 11 II 11 a a 11 II 11 11 11 11 11 II 11 o H II 11 II II II 11 II II II tB m is 11 It 11 11 II 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 is II 11 11 11 .. .. 11 II II II 11 11 11 II 11 ; II II II 11 It 11 II II II a a O 11 A A II r r II II r •. 11 11 II 11 11 N N 2 70 V 11 •✓ r II A A 11 a P II a P It N N II N N 11 P P 11 .. I• N 11 .0 10 11 N N II O O II co m 11 O O it W W It H r It V V 11 O O C a •• • II • • 11 • • 11 • • 11 • • II • • II • • II • • 11 • • 11 • • 2 2 1.. r 11 O O 11 O O 11 r •• II O O 11 O O 11 O O 11 O O 11 O m 11 O O .1 N \ r• II O O 11 O O II A A II O O 11 O O II O m 11 O O tl P P ti O O b 11 II 11 II 11 II 11 II 11 W O • • • • • • • • • • • • 41 • • • 41 • • • • 411 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • N a N in W N N m a z r m m m m a m 8 G 0) tb z D D W W W W 41 W W 41 41 41 C X 9 ✓ O N tr.. N N N N N tT 2 9 N N N N N N N I. r .• be 0 a O O O O O O O ID 40 10 .0 - m z O N t W N t. O •D CO V P A M 9 9 = 3 r ,c z n a a V 'O D n D C z c a r r m z r n N CI A O to O D 2 < D O n m c r -1 a 2 M m 70 O I 1"1 T: N11 K r a N m m o m m • • . r .. .. • o _ 1" y A C a a a 2 C -t A C 2 2 — O a a m co .. m a a 7o X a ao i• z r a -ac 2 a 4 r D { r z m z m 4 m -I 2 r 2 IS � m IT s. m as 9 •1 N D m x z M D r 2 C w •• -In 22 O A O C C ID In s o �nz to PI r 1.. N fll z m �m -C am OA it. H r w r I.. r r w -n N f a t N N N N N N N N 10 t t t t t t t t t t7 n t t t t t t t t t m 0 14 I4 W tr W W W W V 9 C W W Ir W N W 4I W W i S I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 -1 ✓ V V V V V v v V CO = ✓ N r P. I.. r r I. I. ( C O O O O O O O O O 2 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 M m n n n h n h n n h b m N N co co N N N y 0 O ,•p O O O O O O O O O 4 n n n n n n n n n 1 u It II II II 11 II II 11 S C I 11 It II II 11 11 II 11 11 a D I II 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 0 H 1 11 II 11 11 11 11 11 II p m R1 1 0 11 it II It 11 11 II 11 1 11 U II II it 11 II it 11 .. .. I II 11 11 II 11 11 U 11 11 x I II 11 II II 11 11 11 II 11 A A O 1 11 11 r r It r r 11 N N u .. I- 11 11 I. 1. 11 t t 11 2 2 10 IN N 11 a 6 II O O HO O 11 O O 11 O O 11 V V U 0 01 N a a 11 O XI I W W II t t II O P 11 V V 11 O O 11 O O 11 0 N 11 W 10 It O O 11 Lou C D I • • 11 • • 11 • • 11 • • II • • 11 . • 11 . e II • • 0 • • 11 • 2 2 1 O O 11 W W 11 N N 11 0 0 11 O O 11 O O 11 O O 11 N N 11 O O 11 r .y y I CO Co II V V II N N 11 O O 11 O O II O O 11 O O 11 O O It O O 11 r t0 1 II II 11 II II 0 11 It II t O • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • a a a a a z A D N N 01 Ol 01 S A N N N N N N 0 a O •• 0 0 0 o m x o O 10 to V P A -4 a o N i m a-i L n a r -i Z m o I. 74 -I m m • m N A b r • ►1 tl a a m 4 o • •-1 A C. m K n r w K w w N z a m m -1 2 O a IT •w a z r a •• Z a r m z as m o a A r o A m 91 a r z .• N r• n r z 0 X 0 C c ICI m s o XO2 IA M ••• M M TM n .• 0 < A m .0m 0 7 N N N N N O A 'n W W u u U 9 C J., IJ CO W W 41 -1 Z Z 1 1 1 1 1 -1 A 01 P 0 01 0 O ✓ V V V V V m r .. •. r L C -1 O O O O O S O 1 / 1 1 I ti Co -1 n n n n n A m A N N N N N O A r o 0 0 0 0 4- n n n n n 6. u u u it u n 9O u n n 11 11 11 O •y II II 11 11 n 11 in m 11 11 II II II II II II 11 11 II 11 •• •• 11 01 II II 11 11 II Y II . 11 11 II II n A a 0 II CC a II 0) N II .. .• 1 r as n r 10 Il0 ti m n o na as no o n .I .I 0 7 � usp is o o n o u0 o ua. a• u01 a ca •- I1 • I 11 • • 11 • I • II • • 11 • • II • • Z Z ... II CO 1 n 0 O II 0 1 0 11 N N Il 0 O 11 O O -1 •1 \ II V I 11 O O 11 0 1 0 HO 0 11 V V n 0 O CI II 1 II 11 1 II 11 II 01 O • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • X O K b -+ 2 CO C A O /1 D 1 1 1; 1 a x a D 1 K O CI D 5t a o b 1 I m 2 b m n N A m c m ma o 1 1 = v 1 m 7a . 41-.NN„, n m l v z v r r. o 1 1 m } 1 z O r. t Z A n H m N 9I r K M C 1 2 m M N O Mo s .. s •. m o x u m w., -4 mn N 1 • S N C A T O N ki 2 1 1i Ad.+ o (,�`� o a itit I , � Z a M 1 ` 1 To T rCi .'O 1 �l Z O 11 9 O -I n K 1 k IQ n O N a m 1 b x m 1 J� F D X N O M A .....* 1 1 >.......... r I ~ m 17 r r 17 o z l z a O. • 1 1 m0 V. a A 1 z A A b -I v co m I 1 73 D Z O n I m 2 mm O K 7CK � m CO N K K C In m c z I �� -1 A -1 x m .4 I O x •-• x O ' 1 O Z O S D X I 11 m -1 -1 1 Oart m -Y r a K 1 m -I K Tao 1 (71 m A !:\ 1 A b N ~2 2 I O m 2 b l 1 A co m 1 D 2 O r N am m m II Yy 11 On2c l,�\ I ( m z s m 74 : 2 2 b O C A r wN 1 Y. m 2 CO A C 77 m m CO C 1� A Z Y7 A N r 1� s N 1 N K r n an a> r m m 1 -1 1 70 ^ v m •. N �+'iq 1 m .1 .. N D n v A a I K I 17 \- m N o n l ( K A l 4` Z N 3 c 00 ~ n i 1 I O Z 2 K � w x N z o a O 1 O a N co N z 1 a N 0 .- N K a 2 -mi M m m CO z a .9m w C 'tl = 1�7F` C -1 m L O O 77 Z b O m 1 �+ O -Y 1 n O A r 1 n ti O O I V Z K O m r p O O 1 Ib N x t'1 D N N r 2 = n 1 N IN, D OC0 C K D m b `2, 1 1 �IpQ`` O ^' a Ifs. O :0 Gi ►r 1 IQ` C K T 1�l m m z • `-Alk • 23 • N c1 i1/4I H b r °Q A n I n -Y 17 iNkZ O N -1 x O Y d r r x O o L"1 G O m s >J '1� I�1 m c c 14\ A O (� v7 c s 73 m ro r I A o 1 �U m m a s 1 z i1 °0 c N m n W 2 I �! O w ncrik.N N m D D •• •• S 77 N V c m m ►aY z p IN Y, - m e 1 c c { z K j•`�C.J 2 a m 8li m mV a 11 -Y m 4- >a m z I x c z • • m 445 o o • I I I • • • • • • • • • • • 9 • • • • • • • • • 0 • • • • • • • ♦ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • n Z IJ u u W w /J La W Ca C A 0i co co m co CO O CO CO 2 A N N N N N N N N N N O A O W 4 W W 41 W t•1 N N m 2 O a a + u N r O .0 tO A M to m to m m CO to to D C C C A A 717 m D A D A A M O M A n m 2 K qS D D Z -.I { �I D �1 m } C r O A I. A .. o r ft, o o c v 1- ., A -1 N A 11 A 11 m O D D 2 C A m wo r r r m x r is D m a o M m. A x p N w `m a A M C+ Z N • 2 H A N o m 2 a c 9, A x m is x a D 2 n O A r m m ro T9r Z ti Z C •• y M A o W o 3 10 10 O 2 2 2 2 X Z 02 O C 10 r M X C CO M M M M C C 10 m W CO d O O M 0 O O O O 2 C \01 Z O N r O 10 t O m O 07 O O M Po M ..I 10 O W 10 O O 2 10 b 10 V m n O a at ✓ N A O r •• O O O O A m %a 10 IT O 70 N O O N N N N N N N N TI ♦. I+ I+ •• ilk t r w• r r r O A 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 11 10 r r a 10 10 a P P P a O n o O O ♦ O O CO P O b VI m 0 1. N P m W t O N O P m '0 C ♦. r r O .P. 4i. O O o O O -.I Z 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 H P P or P P a a a P P P O W N N IJ W W W IJ IJ W IJ O 2 I 1O r a V IO IO V V V V V C. C V O O N V V N N N N N 2 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 '0 W ♦ n 10 e O 1O o 10 A RI ✓ I1 V V O A 1+ H H t a N 01 II II 11 11 II 11 II II 11 b C 11 11 II II II 11 II a 11 A D 11 II II II II 11 0 11 11 0 •• 11 II 11 11 It II II II 11 m m II lI II a II II II ll 11 11 11 II 11 Il ll 11 11 11 •• •• II 11 II 11 11 :I 11 II 11 X 11 II II II 11 II 11 11 11 D A O 11 4. 0 II 11 W 1: 11 r r 11 ♦ Si Iw It 11 11 11 2 A b 11 O O 11 t0 co 11 10 10 II 41 W 11 10 10 0 II P W N II M M It r r u G+ W O A \ II O O 11 U W 11 P P II O CO 11 N N O 11 N V CO II N N 11 V V II IO 10 C A II-. II • • 11 w a II • • II • • 11 • • • 11 • • • 11 • • II • • 11 • • 2 2 O II O O 11 O O HO O 11 N N 11 O 00 II P P O 11 O 07 HO O 11 0 to V +1 II O O II O O 11 O O 11 O O 11 O O O 11 0 1 0 0 II O O Il ♦ o. II O O 11 11 1 11 11 1 11 11 1 11 II 1 11 r Co I . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • a a a b a a a a a 1 X IC or ► ► ► ► ► ► ► ► 2 A A u U U u u u u W GI C 72 9 Co CD Co Co Co 0: Co Co 0 2 A N N N N N N N N N N CO 9 O 0 • • • • • u u w 01 2 0 V • W N ► O .0 0 V A -i ti O 0 n n n n n n n 9 -I � z a c v z rft A K a r r c r m -. -a r m a K '~n 2 m a a r 1.4 m n g• m x Y Y 72 C r o 0 C t 9 Y r Y 2 C n 9 m 2 2 Ill C 7C a O O m Z ' 0 PC z z n 4. r p + 2 { N O K 9 II I D 0 i 'q N A MI 72 r A 0 72 01 -tor z •. y r• n W O P 2 2 N ► 2 O 2 9 -11Z 0 72 0 •0 Co 40 M N N 41 0 •. N •• a C: C •0 m C N .0 P O O O V O O 0 0 2 O X 0 2 •0 O 0 Co Co Co 0 0 Co Co m or ► Or N N 2 O o •0 b .0 .0 .0 .0 m n oil) K ► 1"• O O O O O O O A m \H O m OA Co N O N N N 0 0 N N N N N N 9 N M or ► Om I.. Fs ► 1•. 0 a I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 n - P - P P P - 1► P PPPPP a n h' m O P 0 P O O P V Co V 01 V FYI O .0 O or 0 P 0 P P • 0 0 0 01 0 9 C r- O • 0 O O •• ► O 0 0 0 0 0 y 2 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 •1 P P P P P P P P P P P P P P O N u u u 4.1 u u 4d u N 41 u 41 41 Cu 2 N V V V V V • • V N v V V V t C O N O N N N O O N O N N N V 2 I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 9 O O 10 .0 A C V) O O O o O A A O O A A t OO 11 11 II II II 11 It 1 tt '0 O 0 II 11 0 II 11 0 II A A II II 11 0 11 II 11 11 0 0 II 11 0 II 11 11 II 0 CO m 0 II II II 11 II II II II II 11 II II II II II •• •• .• II II II II 11 II 11 II ! Y II II II II II II II II A A 0 N II II 11 11 11 11 II N N 0 ► 2 72 0 pr. II N N II CO 0) 11 N N II Cm W I1 .0 10 HO • N 0 .0 •0 II 0 N W O W I.• C 0 or • 11 • • 11 • • 11 • • 11 • • II • • 0 • • • 11 • • 11 • • • • ♦ • $ Z O .0 11 Ib Co 11 W W 11 • • II • t 11 N N 11 N 00 HO 1 O 11 N r 01 O N 4. ti H 'N. Co HO O II ID Co 110 O 00 0 00 O HO 00 H0140 1 0 11 • 10. 000 (4 .0 11 It 11 II 0 11 11 1 It N O I . I i • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • a a a a a a a D a Z Z I+ r r •• I� I. r ••• n 2 D a t•1 C4 W W 41 GI W W W C x O Q CO m m CO m m m 2 A N N N N N N N N N N C7 9 O VI P 0 m r S. d + 4. m 2 O W N r o NO C1 V O. Vt A •I •n ro m m m c c o o ro O o a x a m m a a a y a x a o .0a m O S b t m N m 2 S .. A - -i • O a . r O 2 A O A r m •• o a r K C• a 2 •I 7 S C O a a C A X , O r m S .. M • 2 x a 17 N 2 N • N O m fi 2 X is. V• • •I 2 O m 2 x M a •• O m { 2 C -1 x .i ••1 • . .1 el N O to T 1•I • N a y A X CI •• O x 01 • 2 roar a x .. H w n X b t 2 IO m V O I• A m 22 O x 0 IN C M •I Z Z C O V M NO C C 1O M C O 1.• O O O O O N N •-• 4i S O X 0 2 m o m co CO CO O CII O N 01 CO r •• ••I •/ 10 O 10 IO m m CO CO O N VI m A OW '1C O P 0 0 P 01 P CO 1D C x m b m O A N N N N N N N P N N N 11 .• J. r r ♦ ♦ A P. t f 1 N O a I I 11 1 1 1 I 1 1 I n i O1 IO Os O\ 10 IO b IO b m O CI n m o m m O O O O O r1 O m 0 a * m V7 41 co W N CJ CO V tl C O ♦ O O d a i1 O ♦ O I• H 2 1 1 11 1 1 I I 1 1 1 •4 co C1 C1 O, OI 0, Cr, P P C1 01 O W W W W IJ W W W W W IJ CO 2 ✓ 1O r V 1O 1O 43 01 10 CI NO C. C N V 1- N V V V O V m m 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 '0 O ' 1O ♦ O O t a t ♦ IO m x m V V V V V NO O A r •• ••• r •• C• It m VI 0 Ir i N N II N N N N N N S O N N N N N N N N II a s N N N N N u 11 N N n S N N N N N N N N If m m 11 11 11 11 II 11 11 II 11 11 11 11 II 11 11 11 11 11 •• •• II II II If If II II •• M II II In' _ N N N II N N II . . N II . D a O 11 II N N 11 II N 11 •• •• 11 N N II N N 11 W C4 N N 2 A 1O N 4I• as nu, a 11 O r i 11 V IO 10 b 11 O O 11 O• 01 HO O 11 r •• 11 m O A II as 1 •1' Nu W 11 V O O II P N N N 11 IT CI 00 O 11 O O 11 0 CI 0 I+ C a � 11 • I • 11 • • 11 • • • 11 • • • • 11 • • 11 • • 11 • • 11 • • 11 • 2 2 O U O 1 0 11 O O 11 OI 10 h II O 0 0 0 00 O 11 CO CO II O O MO O 11 NO •• i II O t 0 HO O 11 0 N O Ho O O O MO O 11 V V 11 O O II O O 11 m ID 11 1 11 N 11 11 11 11 11 II Cv O • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 • • • • • • • • • ; • • • • • to • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • i I .a.. � r ea. " r r 2 A A W W W W W W W CM T O CO CO CO O m m S p N N N N N N N N m a O O VI V cot N V7 Jr) M z a O .0 CO V P N ♦ 27 .-4 b I C5 0 C1 0 C1 m m to O F O O To A X D M M XI r r •• 2. < ;0 M c O r .1 N M A r O M M A F. M M rt — 2 0 2 M O A Co r I. c CC 1. .. r 11 S O 0 . -1 .. 0 m 2 M M r ,c 0 a z c K a z a O — ]Il ~ -1 • .• 0 M s Int 27 z 0 a s .. 0 A .-` Y C1 '0 C A O a r M D 2 0 a .4 N XI Z y •. C c 77 M m z 1 � zo .. y .. 11 2 11 O co N 0 N ♦ .. O 211 2 0 22 0270 .. 0 0 0 •O •v 0 CO a Co w 0 .. M CC $0 MC C I O 0 0 0 o, 0 v a 41 0 00 O v 2 0 \C1 = 1 O O 0 N P ♦ W •O 0 •0 COOS C7 of CO w •. w. .4 O .0 0 ♦ 0 ♦ 0 V O O CC. .0 MC) O O K 00 .0 N W W W W O 00 O A M N.m I O A N N O VI MN 0NN00NN O N O. N N N to. 11 •. •. Y. NNN NNNNNNNN N 0 logo .• .0 02:. II 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 n P OD •.. VINVI V ama VINV: Na o.. as a ♦ on .O • .. NNVI VINN VIauloN N r b .O a h` M O I O P a N ♦ .. ♦ r ♦ N ♦ r ♦ r ♦ .. .0 P P ♦ ♦ T C O O W 000000000000 •. 00 O O .42 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 of a s Os 000 000000000 P O. P OA P O W W W N W N W N W N W N W N W N W W W W 02 ✓ V V NNNNNNNNNNNN N V V V VI C. C N V O •ON .O NON .ON .ON .ON O NN N O 'b 30 d MT OM I. II 11 1I II 11 Il /I .0 O N N N N N N N as II N N N N II 11 O •11 it u it it u it it M M it u u u u N It II N N II N II II .. .. II II lie O 11 II 11 2 0 II 1 N . II V V II ,7• 2. O Ho. r 11 1 HO .0 to 11 N N 1"• II 11 r r 277 .O Roo 00. 0 1 1141 .. 0 V V V W N W .. W ♦ RN V 00 O to 041 W N O O O 7C \ 11 ♦ 1.141 11 '4 I V 11 W V .. ♦ P Q. i- m P N O V •O Il t ♦ HO .• .O N ♦ ♦ 00 0 0 • • • 11 • 1 • II • • • • • . • • • • • • • II • • II • • • 11 • • 11 • • 2 X O 11 .0 OW 00 1 0 DO 0 14 6.1 W .O N O N N V O � 00 W u V NM HO O 00 O M .4 \II VI O VI 11 ♦ 1 ♦ II W 0 ♦ •O W V CO ♦ N m V •O N O in Vt N ♦ o 110 O N O O •O 1 I N 11 r N N 11 N 11 I ♦ O • • • • • ♦ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • A A A a A a _a A a L X `.. `. r D44. Si r Is ► 2 A A W W Cu W W W W W W C A 17 N C C Co Co co CO Co CO 2 70 N N N N N N N N N N m b O P P P P P P P P P m 2 O •O CC V a N ♦ W N r A ti 9 •+ x x s 2 s z 0 a v a c O w m A A C C D 2 r cc a z z -4 -4 K n r a x m m m m m O S -1 S I. b 2 a a . r � 70 A 73 a '0 o Cr m s .p. C .. -I• b X .N . y p w �' 73 w m ., m 7 A ., z •i 70 A a a o s _ IT 70 z a A -C m A -1 r to -I w • m b A ; 01 N A .t x r N 0 70 ill 71 A r z O 41• N 1� O O O 2 0 O 0 0) 2 2 I; Co 2 22 O A p z z .+ c •D c c r IN e O 6441 C c •0 m a 0 O N O W W O 0 0 ♦ O 2 0 \ 0 z COCO0) a 07 Ia 1 V Ca V CO r d r r r ••• M .- W W •D •O .0 • b m f1 00 •< NO Co O 07 O 00 O 00 O A m \ +1 0 m o 2 P P N N N N N N V M U Y 0 A N N 4- in. N .. I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 •. • P •0 P P' N .0 P 10 P n O It r 40O N 0 O O P P a O •O m0 p 1D C P r ► P t t d ♦ V P 11 C r .• 0 ♦ O r # O 0 0 ► O •1 2 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 -I P P P P P P P P P P P P O W W W W W W W W W iJ W W Ib '• 10 •D V 10 V ‘0) V V V•D � 10 V t. C V V N V O NI -4; N N r to N V c J V VI b r O A IM r r t N N N II II 11 II II II II 11 II '0 O II II II II II 11 II 11 11 A A 11 11 II 11 11 11 11 II 11 a -I I ll ll n II u at u ll n m m I 11 II II II 11 11 11 II 11 Il ► II 11 II II II II II It w o 11 W Ir' ll 11 II U It II 11 It = II I. . 11 II II 11 11 11 II II a a 0 • 11 N N O II II ► ► 11 co W 11 ♦ t II n N N 11 W W II 2 70 ID 11 O V N 11 CO N II P P 11 O O 11 P O P 11 in N II P O N 11 Co Co •1 I- r q A \ ll N ► ► 11 I. on II CO CO 11 O O 11 V O V 11 N N II ♦ 10 ♦ 11 O O 11 is W C A •' II • • • 11 • • 0 • • II • • II • • • II • • II • • • 11 • • II • • 2 2 O Ile 00 II O O 11 O O II O O 11 O 00 II O O 11 ♦ 10 ♦ n 0 O II O O •• ..i no 0 0 II o O 00 O Ho O HO 00 ILO 1 0 11 N P O 00 O W O O s0 II II 11 11 11 11 1 II II 0 N O I e I I • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • a a a m a a a a a a •• i- •. •. z W W 4 W W W W W W C A 'CI m m CO m Co m m m Co 2 A N N N N N N N N N N O7 a O V V V V V V V V V M Z O CO V 0 m A ta' N •• O 77 V 17 2 3 7< x 7 7< t t- L b o a c o w r o m a a .:1 •A�1 D 0 7c C 2 m c m a IS n a O it. O r N m mO .. .? N r z Y N O 14 m x 10 2 L I, c r t •• o m c. A C m N S r• K S C r •, a m, e+ • m o m m c o r a A -I a O vz a Z 1'7 N a O 72 O A m m a r x .. y r n m Y b 2 o S O z 2 O 2Z O A C V •. c M W •. O •. .. IO C C IO in C A O N O A O O O O C x C `\O 2 •• m V tb m m m m tp a 01 •m M w mi O IO M IO M. IO VO ID NO NO m O O VI K •• O NO O b O O O O O A m NO m O A O N N N O N N N N N T V M. ♦ •. ►. r M. .. .. ♦ C a I I I I 1 I I I I I e"f ✓ 0) NO P W a Co 0 a b O eI O P O 0 ♦ CO CO 01 m O M C P a ♦ ♦ O O N to N a S C ✓ O A O O O O O O ♦ N 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 �1 OI OI OI T P P OI OI P 0O III W w W N W N W W W o z Co V NO V N V N V V IO t. C 7 N V VI N N O N N V Y 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I S to O NO A b ♦ o O o o A 7o m n V x V O A r r 1. o to 11 U 11 11 O 11 11 II II b 0 u u u u n u n u u a s 11 11 II 11 11 11 11 11 11 O N 11 11 11 II II 11 II II 11 m m u II II II u n u u II II 11 II II II II II 11 11 •• m II •• r 11 II II II II II II II X II •• u n u n u II u O a s O II A M II II 11 i-i /' II II II II II 2 ]7 p 11 V V II r r II V V II W 4 11 N N II n .. 11 Co N W 11 V V 11 N N O A 11 A ♦ 11 N O 11 O IO II in O II V V 11 V V II 7 MI m 11 O O II O O C a •. II • • II • • II • • 11 • • 11 • • 11 • • 11 • • • 11 • • II • • Z 2 O 11 00 1 0 11 N N 0 O O 11 N N 11 O O it O O II a I W W 11 Co CO II O O y •d 11 P I P 11 O O It o °O 11 O O H O O 11 O O II OI t W N is O O O O O IO 11 1 II II 0 11 It It I 11 11 P O • • • • • • • • • • • • 411 41111 • • • • • • • 0 • • • • • • • • is • • • • • • • • • • • • • a a b a r z a E .. W W 41 4i W W W CJ W C a 9 CC m O7 Co m CO Co CO m 2 A N N N N N N N N N N m b 0 N m 0 0: CO CO co CO V m Z O V a N ! u N •• O •a A .1 '0 v '0 t o z z z s s m m a 2 O III a C O 9 A A C O A r a z A •c m m r a -4 N is o 0 m ` N N D = Z 4 N s m O , .• r - 0 z .. O C M r .1 •• z n z b n b r a m o -• 2 b m n b z w 7.17 K •C III N M m N I- 77 y 77 a7 z A m b r M = m -, m ax A n N b w A S n b oam •t N '1 b r z z •• H •• n 2 2 11 O Y a .. .. 2 2 71 2 O z 2 O A Q H M O 02 M IT S M M C M CO C C b m ` O O O •0 O 0 O 0 0 O a S O N. 0 Y Co Co Co O Co 0 Co 07 00 e a .1 •. Do S 10 0 10 2 10 0 0 .C 0 O MO 00 K O O O w O 0 0 0 O A 01 b m O A N N N N N 0 0 0 N N N N O m r •• S. I.. w •• is r r Is N r O a I I I 1 I I M ^ a of a a S. C n a a s a a a, CC ! N a O O O a a s a O m O a! Co ! N a a a N a ! a ro C O 0 0 0 0 •I• o 0 0 o m -4 z I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 t -1 a a s a a a CO a at a s a a O W Ir W CJ CJ 0 La W W W CJ 44 a7 V V V V V e t ! !a V V V V a L C C N N V N N O O O N N V N O 2 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 "0 Co •0 10 b b O 27 XI 77 O O O O b •C 0 O O A I b b b b 4- C 0 C C 11 it 0 It 11 11 0 11 0 -0 O 11 n 0 11 11 a n 11 0 a b n II 11 it 11 11 II 11 11 n S II 11 II II II II II II II m IT 1I 11 II 11 11 II II II II II II II II II 11 II II II •• •• II 11 II 11 II II II II 11 r II II II II II II 11 11 n a b O II W W 0 li n 11 II II O N N n 2 A •0 11 N N II + ♦ II N N 11 CJ 14 11 N •. m •• II II La r r 11 ! ! 11 O A \ ION N • 07 O CO ii ! ! • ! ♦ li W V V •0 II Co CO 11 O O Ps n W W II a a C a em 11 • • II • • • 11 • • • • • • • a • • 11 • • 11 • • • 11 • • 11 • • = 2 O 11 N N • ! NN • ! ! II O O ON O O N 11 O O 11 V 07 10 ;la a 11 C4 CJ V -I Ii O 0 HO OO 11 0 O HO O II O OOO II O O II ! O ! 00 O li W CJ 0 II II 11 11 II II 0 ii II V 0 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 411 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • a a a a a A a a a z a r r r r r r r r r W W W W W W W W W C 73 V CO CO CO O CO O CO O Co 2 77 N N N N N N N N N N CO a 0 .O .O 10 O 40 40 4D CO CO IV Z 0 a O a' W N r O 4 co A i V C C i i N 70 A V V V N N _X X r A { { p { ✓ _ z m a z o z m O ro o o s r r e m i H T T : r N V S n X t_ m a pi o n m O n n V C x m m s -4 C r vi z r z z r 7: m s c r m m O S+ r is c to i m n r A IS r m o A m r n A C 7L -1 I'/ S m A A X 2 O ►+ - I i n I r n I O A 7C 2 n to b N O .b L O 7) I'll T a r z •• i p; n O O O Lt O O vO 0 0 a• 4O b 0 z z O X 0 S Y Y a• b b O N r N b r = 00 b m Is IS r N O O W V W r O W W 2 0 *p O 2 O 0 0 V r V is W r 0 Is N N O w r /.i 1 P. 0 N O 1C 2 a W 00 m ee 00 •C rN 0 o r NO CO CO Am \-I c m o A 01 OS as O O O 0 0 0 O N N N N T ✓ V V r r r rrr r 0 4.. 4. O A 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 (I is r IS Is Is IS r Is r Si SO 10 NO SO O n r Is is O O O O O O Ss O O O O m O W W 10 0 0 ► P 0 0 N V O W W V C N N N r r r r is r N O r a• r i x 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ti 04 01 0 01 0 0 P OS 01 0 0 P 01 P O W W W W W W W W W W W W W W tit 2 t t ♦ a t V ♦ a• ♦ W V V 47 tO t C N 0 N O O O 0 0 0 O O O V V 2 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 V C r r r A A A A A CO 4. ♦ A IT O 0 O O O O O C 10 V V O A n 0 n a a A a a r r t ✓ r r o r o c c 0 0 it it it it it ti it it c ti II 11 U U 11 II It A A 11 II 11 11 11 it 11 II C3 ^I 11 It 11 II 11 II 11 II m m II II It II a 11 II 11 II 11 It 11 11 II 11 II e• •• II It 11 Ii It II II II S II II II II II II It II a a 0 It II 11 II r r It 11 n r 11 11 W N 2 A 10 r 0 11 W W II W W 11 N N 11 O N tt W r r 11 O O 11 O V 11 N ♦' co O A \ V O O N N u r r It 0 0 OW W II O O• W 0 q O O II P Co CO II O 00 C A r • • II • • 11 • • 11 • • 11 • • 0 • • • • II • • 11 • • • II • • • Z 2 O a' V 11 V V ON N 11 O O 11 N N HO WAIN It r r 11 ♦ a> 0 HO 00 i i 10 V 40 O 11 0 O HO O II O O II W O 40 4> 11 W W II O 00 00 O o 10 11 11 11 11 11 11 II 11 O O • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • e e • • • • • • • • • • a a a a a z W W u W C A V CO m Co Co 3 A N N N N N CO a O V V V V M2 O X x C C A w m 0 N A ✓ r ✓ o r z m s m m m a n 0 N 2 O •'I •.4 r 2 n n y O O A 2 2 A A C C O m 2 z m o n n r y L. - • c • 2 0 0 z O o At C z 2 In a N N A O 70 m m n a r zn •. v •. n m m m ♦ m O O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 z " O A O m V W r A x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x cc o m C •+ W••03, V NNN NNN NNNNNNN 2 0 X02 a rION IO V0040C0mr rrWNOOOrW W W W W N CO w •. IS .4 N 00 O V POOOOm W W 04 • •44•• •• 0 .4 .4 V No W m n ows c o 0. 0 %40000 V0W ONrOV VPNIVr •0 AM \m 0 m O NOW) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000000000000 M 0 0 0 0 V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V OA 1 IIII 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 n P• 00 ,... 0 on O 0 0 o IT O 11 N VVVV OVVW 000 V OVV VIO1010b •D •OV00 VC w H r •. ft, ft. NNNN NN N NNNNNNNNNNNNNN V 2 • 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 v a Co 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O . r •. W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W2 •.Ip IO O CO t LC 0 N COON CO PPP I I I I OOONNINPON I I I I iI Y O II 1 I t l l l l l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 *Ow s or m r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r A IT a IO V 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000000000000 OA r nnnnnnn nnnnnnnnnnnnnn t_ rrrrrrr rrrrrrrrrrrrrr .. is n u u a m o u is u n n i a s 11 11 N 11 0 1 n H 11 II 11 11 II 1 mm is u u u n U N 11 11 11 II .. .. 0 V 11 11 11 11 •. >S p . II 11 O 11 fts 710X, O 00 0 11 H W n 00 170 V H V 00 0 II 0 NN N o .4 W rrrrra ow ocvosaewm .coo W r O A 4... 11 N 00 O 11 W OOUO W O O m V O 0 P V V O OW W W O W 0 P 0 W W W P •' P $C1 CIO w 11 • 11 • • 11 • • • • • 11 • II • • • • • w • • • • • • • • • .... 2 O ON 00 0 00 0000 404 I4 *. NNNNWedOVNNA000 _ 11 W II O O 11 N 00N0 N O 00 r N N N IO V N 00 P 0 m O 0 N N 0 P O 0 O W V ~ V % 11 11 11 1 0 II V O - • • • • • • ♦ • • • 49 • • • • 0 • • • • • • 0 49 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • o • . _ _ p i 9 ••• 3 N O A C n b I b '1, D A 1 K a p l a a O ..I T < 7< y M 1 O -4S N I M X b m ( n N 70 1 T C m 9 r O I 1j( .. 2 O 1 M A O n me C z C r r+ O 1 1 T �i i 1 4 o I 3 z m N r L 1 C -I1 2 .+ i ..IN O i IN C 2 m S a MI O S 0 T 0 '� i i m N M A r. N \ p N I Q n �. N S I N C m r. o �® m 77 •-• a t .. o i o o i r x �! Tr O b 1 2 z 1 C `Q Z O i IQ�j '� F C T Z O i n K O N O 11� m .I S T A b 1\\V X N Z tl m A n 1 m tl.Nsl h � r b N D i _ r m r r io z r• A .. :L-I m Z O b S 7o A n O i O CD T >' x O n T x ml b m O K 7t K m C O I� N i C M C 2 0 a i S m i ��0o x o f o z o s a x o +I m =1 i c m m -4 r a i I m i K F Co a 1 A '9 N i 1 x I m x n K1 T p D -I a r I K m o / I - o a i 2 t in r b r 3 2 p 1I//_) z lI A F. MO 3 o r N D m m T m f�� C O n Z C_I_� m X 3 m A r a z ro o ly[lFO{I' a 7o r `+ II I V Z 1 m z n a o 73 m m a e I D z o A N r 1 1 a N y i r n M a r m m -4 1 S C m r. N r+ I t C m i .• N a n 2 0 b 70 -c 1 C 72 3 r• en I b w O » i t 3 m y O I i D I Tr N CpnipAT1 I �.r ►� I' iOi �OTCCNAJ ,. N O � 2GM �C� riAN \\11�ic1 'a � iOyONKODN � tb � � � ~ mmaa �DmIrI A2O 17:SIIZO m1 Oir :=1: CI I � 0 7o r 1 n -+ a1Ir' X i Om �" AC1 b = CN .D r C 1 I� ( � b O K 1 a S m .64:..,t;);" \ O C P (�( b A CAi w 1 t� c i n I C m m x I . M • • y o tt` O. ! i A � IW 1 m I 2 A 1 (To H 2 4 tl O 1 m c n 1� 1 IN n a 1(1 ii'' N c j I 1 I m o 1� � C 2 m a so: q .. i� Q.+ 2 N G� i 1 i X 1 \ /Q�' O Y m T tit N m W )D D .. .. = 70 Ii N :D G m m Inv z w ly w m m a i i .c: • 2 A m o: m ml bl i z m O A b 2 I I. • m C Z .. tip 0 • • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •ry I r Y •• V 1• 4• r = A W W W W W W W C A 9 CO O m 0 CC CO 0) MX N W w W W W W W w a O O O O O O O o m 2 O a N � W N m O A m b i i A 9 A a A A A b J •1 mi A 2 2 r a a 1 R a n w m 2 r -t w N X O_ A O a m z r • T O 0 M C M C 2 m X C w a a r n z Y a M S n z m n a o M •. A N -4 O M m D M x N a w A IC N N A O MX n OAm t r zo 0 • .. n 2 'N ♦ 2 T O P 2 W W 000 00000 2 2 OAO Me 0 Me b o ►• N N C C b M C O O P O O r 01 O O W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 \ O Z O m m 00 m m O NOWO) VVPPPP Wm mwM O 0 CO 10 b b O b V O ♦ + 0 001 0 0 0 m n w o O O W OO O O Nr •• ONwroN •' Z m \ •1 cm OP N N P NN V O N `0 w . V I• •• I0 M n 0 a I I 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 n P P ••• P P * W P W W W W W W W W w W b n b b m w W t w a m O CO Cr, 4 44 •" C N S C O 0 N 00 O N O 0000000000 M2 II 1 11 1 1 1 I l l l t t l t l t N P P P PP P P P P P P P P P P P P P O W W 0 W W W W W W W W W W W W W W OZ V V W V V + W V WC N V U N i -0W O N m 0 o o A m O A W 11 11 I 11 11 1: 11 S O II 11 I It 11 11 0 DD II 11 I u II It It n V II 11 I II II 11 II m m It it t it tl it ti it it I ti it it to 0 0 11 It 1 II 11 11 4N r II 11 1 11 11 11 II A A O 11 II 1 11 II II .• •+ II 0 W a O W N W N N 2A b II W P it 1 > > II w II P P 11 O O 11 O •' V W b b J. N r P O Z \ II W N V 11 N N 1 a r V 11 ♦ a 11 N N 11 V V 11 r co N m . W V N •• CO N C a •• 11 • • • 11 • • 1 • • • II • • 11 • ♦ 11 • • 11 • • • • • • • • • et Z Z p H • Pm II to N I W WO II b b 40 O II P a It P • oaoa Pwa • a 1 V \ 11 t 0 * 40 O 1 P I opt II CO Cc 11 O O II O O 11 g) + O b •` CO W 0 111 P CO b 11 11 1 I It II 1 II U O 4 • • • 0 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • e • • • a a b to a To to a a z § a r r r r r r 14 M 4 W W W W 4 4 W 4 C A m O CO co co co co m m 2 A N W W W W W W W W W 0 A O r r r r or r O O O 71 r O N t W N r O V0 CO V b y n n n 2 CO O m CO 61 = m A C C r m A a a m z A -+ A C z N I-. •C •C y y r n o r N r m III m m fll X S (/) r m m z z A A r r < m :+ n 2 L z c c r A O a or a X Y L A r 2 r x z m r m n m r r r r r 2 a 2 2 r y r r a r z 7) y r m A m m -1 n x t • S a n 0 A IC 23 c A O N a m A r 0 en9r H 2 O in y ZZ M pn tn-I -Ni W re b co b a a ►S. CC umg O CO CO CO r W O A 11 O 2 0 \0 2 Co O N ♦ 1"' W CO W or Cl CI Ir r M y W O V W 10 r 10 O r IO m n too -c O X Na 0 O IO O co 2 O co m b M O 2 N N O 0 V O N N N N "I1 or r r ♦ .0 r or N Is or O A p, p • 1 N 1+ r 0 N e b CI 0 O n II* W O r r r ♦ O P P MI 0 VI 10 cn ♦ r 0 V ♦ ♦ 9 C 0 r O O 0 O O O r O O y z 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 rI O ON 0 C• 0 0 a G G G O 4 4 4 N r W W 4 N W C-z W W P 0 ? V C 10 N V Cr C r N O O V O O m O N 2 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 CO ,0 10 n a z b r No W O A S z L . A n it I 1 II 11 11 11 11 ❑ b 0 11 I I II II 11 II 11 11 a A 11 1 I It 11 11 11 • 11 n y 11 I I II 11 II II 11 11 m m 11 I I II II 11 II 11 11 11 I I II 11 11 11 II 11 .. r 11 4 W 1 1 11 N N 11 11 11 11 11 X II r r I I II r r 11 11 II 11 11 A A O 11 O O I I P P 11 ♦ ♦ 11 N N 11 11 4 4 11 N N 11 2 70 IO II O O in r IN N II O O HO H 11 II a P II 0 N II r or 11 O O I 4 4 1 O O O N N 11 W W 11 V V II COW 11 O O U 10 4 0 C A r 11 • • 1 • • I • • It • • 11 • • II • • II • • 11 • • 11 • • • r 11 O O IN N 10 O 11 yO V0 11 G N II O O II O O II O O II O 0 0 y y \ 11 O O 10 O 10 O It P P HO) N II CI 91 11 O O HO O II ° kb O •0 11 I I II 11 II 11 11 II N O • • • • • • • • • • • 0 41 • • 0 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • a a a a 9 a a to a x r r r r r r r r r z D W (Al W W W W W W (01 C A 9 O CO 0 O Co CO CO 0 CO 3 A N W W W W W W W W W Cc 7 O N N N N N r r r r T 2 O ♦ W N r O V 0 V a a mt 9 O O 3 r r 1" r r 9 P H K 9 0p O O O O N A M In S A N d O 0 7'C A In z o o a v v i z 9 -I -.4 -1 r D + N 2 0 r A A N vv) r C m m m M s MI y C 1=1 A 0 N co N O 0 A m r -4 N r w C 2 r r IS -1 m A C P 2 •C 0 9 2 N A r "e OAM C1 T 9 r O 2 O •. y M n N V a d O O 0 0 01 01 N a O 2 X O A O -1 N VISA H W OOO -I V V C C V19C O In rrr O `. O 0 O O r a \02 CO ♦ O O O N V r r O CO O IM. W •I r •• -/ 10 r r •. r T O CO CO N V N 0 I'n n to, 0 -C O O CO CO CO N O P O O A In \•1 V P1 O a N N We IS •. O V IS. Is in N O a tit r h.. r r r n V IS r r Is r O 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I O a a W W W W N W W W a N N O A ♦ N PO Is Is ♦ W Is r IS a r Is m O V Is CO CO CC O Is ♦ a. ♦ ♦ r P 9 C O O O O O O O a a a O O O •1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 N a P a a a a a a a a a a a O W W W W W N to ♦ ♦ ♦ fr' W W C7 2 O. W V V V N V a N O V V V t. C a V O O O b V N N N O O O a 1 1 1 1 1 9 CO ✓ O ♦ V -I A In ' S A O a 4 O 11 11 II II It II 11 II 11 9 C 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 A D II 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 O -I 11 II II 11 11 II II 11 11 m In It 11 II 11 11 11 11 II 11 11 11 11 11 11 II 11 II 11 .. .. 11 A A 11 II 11 11 11 11 11 R X t1 .. • 11 11 II 11 II 11 P 11 D A O 11 O O II r r 11 11 II V NI II P NNN II 11 11 X A IS tl O O 'tip O 11 ♦ r to r II a a 11 r r 11 V W W W 11 a a 11 ♦ S. II N N O A \ jig O U O O t1 0 P OO II O O II d 0 It P NNN II a N 11 W W 11 O O C D r II • • 11 • • II • • • • II • • 11 • • II • • • • II • • 11 • • II • • 2 2 r 11O O 11O O 0 OOO 11O O II N N 11O 0 0 0 HO O 110 V 11O O M .I \ 0O O B ♦ ♦ 11 O 0 0 0 II O O 11 N N 11 O 0 0 0 11 O O C V V 11 O O V 11 II 11 11 II 11 it 11 11 W O I I .. • i • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . I f. if • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • s D a a A a To A a a x 7e .. r r w 6. r r •• I '. z a D W W W W W W W W W C A a CO 6 m m 01 Co m m m 2 A N W W W W W W W W W m a O W W W W N N N N N m 2 O W N r O 10 W V P N A -I O 0 O O O o a n n A O m m m D D A A A n O C z m C rI O D K O A in C A 1.1 r z x m o a M mb A 4. -CC O M -C C O •1 w A X .0 n .1 I. CO O 9 N O T -• N A n -I 2 2 N 2 C a a O D a 9) O H A N n A M m S o r a 7C - O A • r C O is n 2 O a m 4 Dr a N a 2 A it K O A m 1: ar z0 •• y w n m 4 2 0 N N O 2 V 2 n z z 070 O N 2 r• -i -I m %0 •• N •• O C 10 m C n O O O O -0 � O V O CD 2 O *4.0 z D m m m co ^ IC N Q3 Gm r 1+ IS44 J[ b �o �o a b .• a •• M n ►• m K O O O O C> O o W O V z r., ..m ox N N N N N C V O N O Co en 1. r n 1.• r CO IO W. OM N P a D • 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 n Cc P P N 10 •• O O N P W IT O U• N CO M. m m. I. P. r O N ro C O O O O O N N N O O •• •r 2 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i P P P a 0 P O. 0 0 P P O W W W W /T N •• W W W N CO z ✓ CO V W W N P V W V N I.- C W O N ; W O W O ; O O 'fl m O IO ID O a O n X m X 2 L A r z 11 II I ti II II 11 II 11 S r ll 11 I 11 II 11 II II 11 a D 11 II I 11 a II II II II n -• 11 II I II II II II 11 11 It m II 11 I II 11 11 II 11 0 11 II 1 II II 11 0 II 11 .. .. II II 1 11 0 11 11 11 11 T 1 11 11 I II 11 11 11 11 11 a a O 11 II V V I 11 r b 0 I...- M• Il Cc W N II Um. I. II 2 A •0 11 •• I. 11 W W I P P II m co 11 0 P 11 V. P •-• 11 N N 11 N N 11 01 N O A \ 11 O O 11 IT P II N N II .-• •• 11 W P .0 N P W O 11 P P II m m It P P C a r 11 • • 11 • • 11 • • 11 • • II • • • II • • • II • • II • • II • • 2 z Is. 11 O O 11 O O 11 O O II CO CO 11 b V N 11 O V N It O O 11 N /r II I. y d 11 O O II O O II 0• C. II N N II O O O if N •p W It O O II m m It N N ID II II II 11 11 11 11 11 11 P O I y; 1 , 1 • • • • • • • • • • 0 • • 0 • • • • • • 0 • 1 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • I I 9 a a a 9 a a a a 2 a r ' .• r ,- r r r r ,- .• Li w w w W W GI W W C a '0 I CO Co Cc CO Co CO CO CO P 2 A N W W W W W W u W W O a O t a a W GI W W W W rn 2 O N r O .G O V P N a Z ti 9 n 01 'n m m m m m m S 1 b r a, z o w N 2 M a m coa K I m O 9 9 n7 m rn z z N n C w n m rrn I fr.rn rn r col m m z C 144 77 C m K < z v z r a m 7o -1 n 1 m • w 70 77 9 2 a O X to rn 9 N 9 C 2 L ro 2 Z a 9 a a el w C 7 rr.rn3 2 X O n rn 1 w m 07 S al a n N C r m N •. r C M 2 1 a z N N 9 S 70 S N n O7CIII m • T a r 2 O .. •1 •. n N O N O N 3 NO a W 2 22 O XI O •1 r •• b 1 •r X V 10 O C C 10 rn C O 6 ♦ •- O O N i0 b A 2 0 N.0 2 ✓ 0 V a O Co O b b X rA w r In H .0 O b so `C P O O 1-. M n w y K O O O O V N 70 m N.•1 0 m O 70 N V w V N O N V V V N '11 •- V •- 0 r a a V V V 1• 0 9 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 n O, N Ir •- P N b N N N OI C n V W n .• H 47 O W W W .O M O ..1 O to b a .o W .- 0 0 a ro C O Q O r O O t O O O O N 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 H CI P P P P 0 0 01 P O P O W W W •- W W W W W W W m 2 01 ♦ V A W V s0 t ♦ ♦ V L C t b D a V V V O V N N N W 74 NO O ♦ 9 m V O F a tr 0 11 II 11 11 11 II II 11 1 11 9 O II II II II II II 11 11 1 11 a 9 II 11 11 II 11 It ti 11 1 11 0 -. 11 11 II 11 II II 11 11 1 It m in II II II II II II II II II 11 li 11 11 II I1 11 11 11 .• .• 11 n .- II 11 O 07 11 11 It 11 11 11 X II • • 11 11 • • 11 II 11 II 11 0 9 a O b a 07 11 11 P O 11 11 I7 11 N N 11 11 X 70 10 11 N N 11 11 b NO 11 W W II 1^ r 11 V V II N N II Co a N a 11 O A \ 11 W W 11 V V 11 Os Os II P Os 11 O O II W W 11 r• r 11 N (POW 11 O .0 C a I..11 • • 11 • • 11 • • 11 • • II • • I7 • • 11 • _II • • • • 11 • • „ r II P 0 11 .O 0 11 a ♦- 00 O NO O 11 01 N 11 O O li Co 10 NO .0 11 O O y ti \ It P P It P P 11 O O II O O 00 O 00 O lip O up 00 N 11 O O NO II 11 11 II 11 0 11 11 It O O 1 t I i 1 • • • • • • • • • 0 • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • z 9 9 Z. 9 9 9 9 9. X A . •-• r r I.I.•. I.. I.. r W W W W tJ W W W W C A '0 CO O CO CO CO CO CO CO W 3 A N W W W W U W 1.: W W CO 9 O O to a a a a a a a m 2 O h. O ID CO V P N a W A -i '0 C.- C. t. t_ •. •'I X X X m o •. •. 9 z a 9 9 9 9 X to 3 r m xi x 3 d z r as 0 9 z o 2 m to co z •• ►. O m m O S •• C 2 z A A : O Xs 0 A F 0 m I O 9 9 •. C •' X V N A O •• n .. X. V m O N co X • 2 Z X. O • m M O -I n 9 n A A •• r Y 1M r t 2 2 •C w m 9 m 9 9 r fI C A •I 2 A m •• m 2 m r m z co m to O O 2 m • a —4 • 9 r o n •• N m 9r a x o z e tn9 . •ri r n m 33 z m . ro OAm m r mgr K 2 a .. y •. n •' to O 2 N b = 2 O a O O a a I-. m r y w •• O C K ID m C ID V O O V CO O O O O 2 O \0 2 O {o co CO V V CO CO Co IO CO M •. M ti y a SO b CO •. ID b W O III n r 0 'C —I O O CO V O O O a A m .to OM OA N N N N N N N N N O m •. r r F. W. r .. I.I. " r O Z. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 n O a P CO CO co OI co to N O n a a a m a 0 N N N of m O a Ip N N •O a •. r r to ro c O O O O O O O O O N -t z 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 •I OI O ON a P 01 P CO OI P O W W W W W N N W W W m 2 O b CO V OI N N V O W D. C I's O O N W r O N W O 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 .O C YO IO .O O O IC, O O O A In O A t_ II 1 II II 11 11 II II 11 11 A O II 11 11 II II 11 II 11 11 9 b 11 11 II 11 11 11 II 11 11 n r II II II II II II II II u m m u u u u u of u u u of of to a to to of II II •• •• II It to It II II II II II Y II b 11 11 II II I II 11 II 9 9 O II II II II II 11 I II II W W II 2 A IO II CO O II OI P O a a II ID IO II W W II N O II O to Il of OI II W W O A \ II o o II b ID II CO CO II O w II N N II 0 CD II I.' O II O O II 1.1 W C 9 •"' II • • II • I • 11 • • II • • II . • 11 • • II • • . II • • II • • z z in. 11 O O 11 ID 1 ID 11 O O 11 N N 11 O O 11 O O 0 O N CO 11 O O II N N r •si \ 11 O O 11 0 1 0 II O O 11 O O 11 O O II O O 11 O O O II O O 11 a b 'O 11 II 1 It 11 11 11 11 II 11 CO O • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 0 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • e • • • • • • • • I 9 b b 9 b 9 9 X. 9 X C N 1.. •• r r in •. r •. 2 b b W W W W W W W W W C 70 b Co m Co C m m Co m CO 3 A N W W W W W W W W W C 9 O P N In C m m N cn to m 2 o O 0 m V P an r W N S i b ✓ r x x 2 x x x x A b r F v. M m m m A z b z z x .• rn e 2 C C1 CI b r 11 m m M (n M .. .. m m 2 2 0) in A ea n a O A Z S O O r b o fi • O 11 w b 11 n 0J •1 3 m O O m m c m b 9 p m 3 N O P4 N 0 CO m 111 S H a r5 D x T 9 9 1 •c co • y 3 M O -4 4 O m x N r C M ro Hb K Q 2 m I 11 9 r I . -i z C I. w n tl N It 3 f) 3 O V V V 0 O w 2 2 O p 0 1 Co .O •• O M CO .O .0 CO 1 .0 CO C C •C m C I In r O 2. CO C V V Co O •. W 3 0 4.4.O Z II r o Co m N 9 4. 4• V m on •0 CO 1+ •• •• .i •. Is .0 .0 0 b V N CO b .0 N m n r N 'C I O O O O O V W O O N z m \•.I .0m OX. O CO O O t. N O O N N V Co '0 r Co 1• •. se ♦ •• Y I.. I., YD P c 9 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 N on N N W n3 r O N N O. O. on N C .7 •-• on W W P N •. W m e •. r .0 .0 ♦ W W W ♦ •. .p n 11 C O N O O O a 0 0 0 O •. •. •c 2 I 1 11 1 I 1 1 1 1 l 1 -4 P P O P O T P O. ON ON P O. O W N W W W W N N N W N 01 2 ✓ N V CO ♦ .0 N N N W t N Ir C O O O O O V N N N V V O 2 N b ? O O m .17 m A O V O O P z N •• 3 L C1 m N 3 1 II n II 11 II 11 11 II 7 O I 11 II 11 11 II 11 11 II 9 9 I II II II II 11 II 11 11 CI V 1 11 11 11 II 11 II II 11 m m 1 it II 11 11 11 11 II II I 11 II 11 11 II 0 11 II •• .• I II II II II II II 11 II X 1 II II 11 II 11 11 11 11 b D O I W (: II 11 r II N N 11 11 N N N 11 N N 0 r r II � .• S A .O I CO m II P O. 00 •• CO HO O N O• P 11 ♦ m .• a no O n N N II CO CO QD A 1 m CO II O O II 4. V V 11 O. P II .0 1 .O II CD V .• .0 11 O O 0 O O 11 N N C D •" 1 a • II • 1 • 11 • • • 11 • 1 • 11 • 1 • 11 • • • • II • • 11 • 1 • 11 • 1 • z 2 o- no O 11 a 1 O. II V Nth 11 m l m no 1 0 II O. OI N m 11 O O II O 1 0 II N I N •1 •i II O O II V 1 V 11 O O O II V i V II 0 1 0 11 N W W Os II O O 11 0 1 0 n m 1 01 .0 11 11 1 11 II I II 1 II 11 II I 11 i V O IP • • • 0 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • D D D D b D 9 9 D r z •. .. •. •• •• .s r r r S a a W W W W W W W W W C A 9 Co 0 CO CO O m 01 m CO 2 A N W W W W W W W W W O.' A O a Os P a 01 a O. P P m z O 10 on V 0 0 • W N •• A •1 D 7 3 2 A a r r r r 9 z x n A z z C 9 W •C It RI A 01 w r D i-• M - r N z m n r to z s A .. o -a z = N A w O O e1 C z r a o o o b O O ✓ L D 2 C 9 A X, N P•4 ra A D N t1 H 2 r -c A N r O o r a -c e A •. N y D m A X 3 m K ro A O • A A 23 to N Y CO m z z x Z IN m vl ar i z a i t f1. O t- t• a O 0 0 O O •- ma %. a 2 0) on r O co co co co co t• g2 •. r M •1 10 10 0 10 V0 10 10 .0 .0 f^ t1 MO .C O O O O O O O O O A m m O A N V V O O N N N N V V '11 I-. 10 Co •• S. r Si •. r V0 s0 O 9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t1 a N N N N a a w a .. t• o n • W r r v0 O• P N • •- tr m O O W o •• O • • •. 40 N N 9 C O O O O O 0 0 O O W W N z 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ti a P a a 01 a a 02% O, P O• 0 W •- •- W W W W W W � •• 07 2 V • • V V V V W V • • 4 C I V W N O 1 I 1 I V W S A O A z t_ o it n it ti it it it to ti ro C II II 11 II 11 II 11 II 11 D D 11 11 11 11 ti 11 11 U 11 n 1 11 11 II II II 11 II II 11 f1 m 11 II u u 11 U II h 11 u n u u u 0 n u u •• •• 11 11 11 II it N N 11 II X 11 ❑ II 11 11 II I li 11 11 I A D O u u u n II W W 11 I u r. •- a t• i- n I Y A v0 11 Ir N 11 N VS 11 V Ni 11 N N 11 40 W 11 V 1 V HO .0 11 0 0 • NI W • O A \ II d C Co O II V V II V V II W W 11 O I .- • ON N II N N N V I V O C a � 11 • • II • • II • • 11 • • 11 • • 11 • 1 • a 11 • • II • • II • I • • z 2 •• II • • 11 W W 11 N N 11 a a 11 O a II a 1 a N 0 O O 11 N P 11 N 1 N O -1 -1 \ II 0 Co II O O 11 • • It O O 11 O O II Ole O II O O 11 O O H O 1 0 0 V 11 II 11 11 II II 1 II II 11 I C O • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • a a a a a a a a a z s .• r r •. •• im r I.. .- 2 a a W 41 W W 41 W W W W C 73 CO CO m O CO m Co CO CO 2 A N W W W W W W W W 44 co a O V .1 V V V V V V V m z O Co V a a * W r.1 .- O b 1 V O O O 2•O O O I $4 1 m a 1 "1 .1 2 O m r r N m x S S a a o m m 01 m z z Z x x TO Z C1 A .. y •. f• X O O n n o G m -I .. z -i 114 IS IC 3 a x 2 2 -t • r m n 1 m m z 2 r A m0 O a C 91 -C m a w w a a r n n r m x o SII ra' r m a .at X a r x -1 n n m O a X .b m m n 12 0 b •• 2 A x n "4 .1 a O A m 1 It m P m a r x x z z .. 1 M n W O P a a * S L o o w N z Or r N CO 0 i W0 n .O .O + 0 C CC Om C ✓ W O N O W O O .• ►. m CD Z O ....O Z N O P w m .O CO CO w I. O O co M r M .1 S .0 41 41 .O S •O .O •O .0 m n 1• N K O W 0 O O O O O A m \•11 .4m OX Is P 0 0 N •• N N V V O O T 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I • ,1 I I d I o W N N Al P W P P 1-. N N N O n .. .. r .• P •• a ♦ O •1 •• .• m O .• P •• r P ♦ .0 .0 N r O. I. 9 C O O r r O O O O •• O O O ti Z 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 -1 P P P Cr P Cr Cr P P P P P O W W W W W W W W .. .. W W C1 2 4. V N P P t 01 CO 1. ? V V C. C O O 0 0 m O 0 0 V .I ; b O Co 0 C1 W .4 0 .4 x m 27Z A A O x .. .I .Z Z 1• 2 2 0 0 I/ II II II II II II II II b O II II II II II II II II II a a ' II II 11 11 11 II 11 11 11 n 1 II II II II II 11 11 II 11 m It N 11 a 11 n 11 II II u 11 II II 11 11 11 is II 11 .• •• II 11 II II II II II II II L II II 11 11 II II 11 II II a a O 11 11 N N 11 0 .1 p. 11 11 .0 P ♦ 0 11 we r 11 2 X .O 11 W W 11 O O 11 P N N 11 07 19 II ♦1 ♦ 11 Ir O a 11 .O .O II O O II a N •. O 3 \ 11 N N 11 ♦ ♦• 0 p V V II O O 11 W CO II ♦ N N II .4 .0 11 O O 11 ♦ .O P C a M. 11 • • 11 • • 11 • • • 11 • a 11 • • II • • • 11 • • 11 • • 11 • • ♦ Z Z •• II b b 11 O O 11 O O O 11 O O II W W 11 .O .0 O 11 O O 11 O O II m W O 1 -1 \ 11 P P II O O II O O O II O O II .O .3 11 + O O II O O 11 O O 11 O O O b 11 11 II 11 11 11 11 11 11 •O O • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 2a § W W 4 W W W W W 0 A 9 Co Co Co CO Co C9 CO Co 2 9 N W 4 4 4 W W W W Ca A O CD Co CO Co Co CO Co .1 It -^ o O• N 1• 4 N y O 0 73 :I 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 O 9 O r w w m m A -I a N A 9 O M X O 9 `t . 1 2 m Y -1 N 70 R m A r x m i n4, p z m N a r A n S N A m w A PI • n A A 0 r S 0 A m A A h • •. S m A I n A -I m x 9 a CI • Z A N A r O N A a o A O G A o a A m m r m m Ax c C. 2 A 2 • o O A m -11Ar 20 .. .I w C. O O N O Z T 0 0 9 O N W 2 ; O A O 10 O N N w o Co o A 10 •1 Ot C C .0 01 C O 0 O O O O W O .0 is. O ♦ 2 0 X 0 2 ✓ O NO Co m Co r 0 O I+ O V m w s. w y IO V 0 CO IO 10 10 9 O b IO 0 m n m H < O •0 O 000 O A O O O A m bm O A O O N N N N O N N N N N N N N V N N 11 m .. P. .. .. IP .. IQ M Pe A I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 in NN 0 0IOO N 001000. 0 0. 0 .• OI a o n •• r N CO COCA is. t IG 1000 P ♦ 4 r I71 V m 0 � I• •• 0 0 o � O NN W CIO No 10 0 Co O 9 C I+ P• o O 00 O 00000000 t O O .•1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I H • N N W N W W W W W N 4 W W W N •. W N CF NN IO NV V IC 0I+ N •• V VrI-. 1• N N L C O 0 O ON V O 0 •• O •• N Nr0 W •. O 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 0 S N O 0 O .•{ O 00000 0 O 9 m C m A o A 2 9 4 •4 0 O ' 0 li II i1 II II 11 9 0 11 11 11 11 11 II II A A 11 11 II 11 11 11 11 0 N 11 11 11 11 C II O m m II it It 11 11 if II II II 11 •I II 11 II .. .• II C II II II II II = 11 II II II II II II A A O ii 11 � •• 11 N 01 11 II 11 11 7 D IO • I+ P• 11 N N 11 I•. O II O O 11 O N 11 W 4 11 0 P II O 70 N N II O O 11 W t N r 11 O O II O 0 N O .• ♦• O r 11 N N Is O 0 II N N C A ►1 • 11 • • II • • II • • 11 • • • • • • a 11 • • II • a 11 • • 2 2 I" O O It O O II W O •• N 11 r 1+ o •. 0 V 01 0 CO O O t 11 O O II O 0 11 IO •13 � O 0 110 O 00 CD OPI HO O HO O NCC 0 0 0r 0 00 O BO 0 007 CO •. ID II II 11 11 11 11 11 O O • I • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ',j • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • a b b b a b b b a _ • r • • • r • • • 2 D 41 41 41 N W 41 41 41 41 C 70 V 01 CO CO 0 m W 0 CO CO Y X N W W w W W 41 41 41 41 O b O 10 0 0 0 10 CO co m O m 2 O • 41 N • O 0 Co V 0 A -1 C C F p A 7:19 O d b b Co O O O O w ti N -C a r tit m m co n b M m a .+ m m m m rn g c m m n co co N A 2 co N 0 i a a M •• •1 C n .y -I m O O O n w O m 2 A 2 2 C A C A a M r r r .4 .• -y b n • 2 A N m C V -n co .• i -I 9 z a r n O or b N Z 2 m ro z m a n y b h is n z m O Z a o O ✓ n a Tar o w • - o • M n O co O 10 O 3 a b b 0 2 2 0710 10 N N O 0i • w n O O C C 10 m C • O O O co O O 1D V O a 0 \O 2 .- Co U CO CO CO CO O 10 10 m r IF. • -1 .0 0 y 41 10 10 10 O O m A • 01 -C O O N •- O O O O V b m N.O m OA V N O O P O O N O O O '11 0 • • • O • • • • 14 14 b a 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 11 n • a N N N 41 41 01 41 N N O n • 0 10 • Is • • 01 ♦ • r m O N 10 Co n 0 O O • O • ^• '0 C 41 O O O O O O O O • • 41 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 H a a P P 01 P C1 b 01 P P O • W N W N 41 W 41 W N N Co 2 • • N 41 01 V • V • N N L C W O O 41 • O O N O 0 0 'O CO ,0 -1 O 92n A m A m A I-I ` 0 C a II 11 II 11 II 11 11 S O II a II II 11 II u b b 11 11 11 11 11 11 II 0 H II II II II 11 II II m m u u u u u n u II a 11 II 11 II II •• •• U II II II II 11 II r 11 11 11 11 11 1 II 11 1 D a O r • II II II • I•' II • • II 1 II II 1 a 7C 10 W CO 11 • r 11 CO co 41 41 11 V V 11 O CD 11 r I Is II • • II 10 IN • O A O7 Q! 11 r r •I • • 10 10 11 • • u 10 V • II N I N 11 O O 11 0, I • CO C b • • • II • • II • • • • II • • 11 r • • p • 1 • II • • II • 1 • • a." 2 S' O O II 07 0 II V J O O 11 CO m II • a a II mow u O O II 0 1 0 0 1 -i -1 \ O O 11 O O II • • O O II O O II CO VI W II 0 1 0 11 O O II 0 1 0 0 1 1+ 10 11 11 11 II II I II 11 I 1 M O • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • it. b b b b b b b b X t •• .- ► •• r• I- r 1+ r 2 b b W W W W W W W W W C A 9 m Co m m O 07 m m m 2 A N a• a' ♦ t W W LI W W 07 A O O O O O 0 .0 •0 .0 0 rn a O W N •• O •0 07 V 01 07 A -I "0 N N N /A N A A A P 1: n b A b b c o IS C b 2 Z Z Z T co o rn •• -c z a n rn { -I 0 2 m m o 2 r r rn v m w c m c 9 o r i m r = 1 n~ "Czz a m r- 21 gm CO Z A rn m I. 2 C -1 N A N . n lb r r A b b rn b -1 •• r m x z m (A O o K ✓ b Ir CO x b o n a Az O to b 2 070rn rn z O .. w n z 3 m 3 N O 3 3 3 O 2 z O z g M M a w -I a. 0. w .• .0 C C .0 m O O O O O a O O O •. 2 C X 0 2 Ps m .. � I. -4 CO b b 07 IVO . •.. .00 CO 0 rn n 1- N t O O O O O 171 O O O O .b rn �-I •0 rn O A O N N N N N 0 N N V X I- •• •• .• .. 1- 0 .- r .0 a b I I I I I 1 I I I I n W ON Or O. 0 Or I- O. P N a n ✓ 0 O r A P •• 0 b W In 0 O ♦ c .0 ♦ a• 0 Co O. t- 9 C O 0 0 O O O I- O O O M 2 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 m 01 0 CO 01 CI P Os 0. 1h P O W W W W W N W W W •• CI '- V V V V .0 N V V V ♦ L C O 0 V N Co N O N N W 2 11 I I 1 1 V O •0 d 10 b O .0 32 ni a A L. 11 0 11 11 0 11 II 11 mi a II II 0 11 II 11 0 11 b b 0 11 11 II 11 11 11 II 0 N II II II II II II II II rn rn 0 0 if II u 0 0 0 11 0 O N N 11 11 0 11 0 •• •• 0 11 II W (r' 11 II 11 0 11 Z 0 II 11 - - u 11 II 0 11 a b O 0 11 II O O 11 11 0 11 0 •• •. J A V 11 V V II CO Or •• 11 or T 0 a• . 11 01 N 11 N N 11 •• is; 11 co Co O A \ - II co Co 0 W 0 V co 0+ 11 W W II O O II N N 0 V V II N N 0 .O .0 C b •• 11 • • II • • • • • 11 • • 11 • • 11 • • II • • 0 • a 11 • • Z 2 1.• 11 W W 11 (n O 171 0) W 11 N N 11 07 co 11 O O 11 V V 0 v V 11 V V V y 11 C `O 11 O O O O O 11 W W 11 N N II 01 OP II O O 11 (0 07 O N 0 r b U II H 11 11 11 0 0 N O i • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • s • • • • • • a a a a a a a a a r x r r w w .- w w r w x a a W W W W W W W W W C 70 13 W CO 07 Co CD co CO m Co 3 X N A 10 1r * t t a• as t CO 9 O ►- � w o 0 0 0 0 o m s 0 N •• O .0 Co V P N as 70 1 A N 0 N N N to o N N 9 C -r -1 N I7 O m A n z• r m 9 a D H z = 2 t r t •9 b r o a P o m ., Ap m r b •• m m a m C A m .. -4 w r- 2, : 11 O 0 O I~ CO II RI O n 2 N • z .. A � X 9 • N D -r r a r a N z N O a r pa n .r z -t z z .. 1 O 0 •• A .. a Z A X a m 2 t N •• • o r z a m .1• 7D r N b A L oz rn 71 a r xo •. y M t1 2 z O V N » o 2 2 2 O x x o z O Pa m co ♦ O N or M. w m V C < 0 MC 0 .+ O N O N O O O CO b 2 0 'VOX O N O 0 N O Co m O N O en •. •• w w .0 N Is. V 10 N b 10 10 .O N m A .. 0 K O C O t no .0 O O O O M A m �R O 70 O O 1• w w w O O O N N N w N 11 •- w w w w r w w w w •• r w r b a 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 n W w W W W W N N N P P P W P b A ♦ O w w w r w r r P P P •- as m 0 O N 10 10 0 .0 •• r r ♦ a 0 P 0 9 0 O to 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O N 2 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 N P 0. P P P P P P O P P P P P O W w W W W W W W W N W W W W co 2 V .0 b 10 0 .0 .- V V N V V V P L C O N V V V V N N O O N 0 O P 2 I ( 1 1 I I I I I I I V a ✓ V N w L •/ .0 .0 C •0 70 m t r 10 In D 70 A O A N O P T " 2 2 0- N N e r 0 0 I 11 II 11 11 Il II II I 11 b O 1 It II II II 11 II II 11 b 77 11 II 11 11 n n U II O -t I II II II II 11 II II 11 in m II II 11 11 II II II 11 1 II II II II II II II 11 •• •• 11 11 P P II 11 11 11 11 11 N N X It 11 4- re 11 11 11 11 tl 11 r• -• a 7? O II 11 N •• W It 11 11 11 11 .- w 11 O O a 7C 10 w It P 0 11 0 V w NW 11 •• r 11 t NI- II N N 11 11 11 O O UN e V V W 11 t t u Co b C: II O V w 11 P P It r V II W W C D w • 11 • • 11 • • . • • 11 • 1 • If • Is • 11 . • • II • • II • • II • • 2 2 •• O HO O 11 P .• O W 40 11 W I W HO P l II O 00 lice P 11 V V 11 W W V •t v. O II O O 11 N 10 co `O N 11 0 1 0 11 N 00 11 P 00 no O II V V II W W w .D 11 11 II 1 11 11 11 11 11 W O 11 f i I • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • s • 0 • • • 0 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • A A A A A A A A A X X n •. r r r .• n .1 r 2 A A u W 41 W W GI W W u C A 9 W 0i CO CO 07 CD O m CO 2 9 N r 0 * * r * r r r tIl A O N 1.1 I. r r IF IPA IF a m 2 O O 10 CO V a 0 * W N A 9 Z C C X C C O V C A 1-i N N O X b O A r 1t O a 2 O r r m 2 A ice+ r s K m c m A N A G O - N r Z O N •• f 1 ✓ 2 A 2 N • O n ..0 in 1"• A A 2 m m F a 9 1c r .. o As m A C C 2 A 2 A 0 D r m Z N 2 A N /w A A X A 3 m A rel 2 C A X -4 w N A 9 AX O70m 9 A r Z .. -I ti A 0 V O O •• .0 0 2 * 2 2 2 O 70 O •0 1O O O N G 0 .'1 IA C G 10 m C N •- a s * O O O O O 2 0 X02 10 10 W W a CO Co CO 4I CO ID ti .- /. Fl O 10 a N O a N 10 a .O MO I• f0 -C O .• r V N 1O O O 77 m d IV O 70 • V V V V O O a N O N O N 9 V V V V r r V * 1.. •- Y- w O A 1 1 1 1 11 1 l 1 1 1 1 0 tr N N N P. W •- 10 N a N 0. O 01 I. CO 10 ON m o w 0 0 0 � 0. .v0 r r W N OI 9 C O 0 0 O VI a N * O O N O V 2 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 •1 a 01 a s a s a a a a a a O a s a s 0 10 W W N /r' W W IF 2 1i1 •1 N IF t ♦ F 0 N V V V L C O 000 O O N V N N O N X 1 1 I 1 1 9 0 I's * -4 O 10 A m C r2 L A N O II II N II 11 11 II 11 11 9 O II 11 11 11 II 0 11 11 11 A A 11 11 II 11 11 0 11 11 II O N 11 11 II 11 11 11 I1 11 11 m m 11 11 • • 11 II II 11 it 11 11 II II II 11 II II II .• I• II N IF N IF 11 r 11 II II 11 1t 11 II r 11 F .. .- � II F II 11 II 11 11 II 11 A A O 11 N a O O N II W a V II 11 N N 0 II II 11 II 2 A 10 II N ♦ O CO r 11 0 * N 11 11 N N 0 V 0 11 1: W 11 1+ .1 11 N N 11 .1 00 W0 a a 11 10 10 0 11 a a II V V II V 10 II W CO Ho a • a es • •✓ c a ` I• 11 • . • • • 11 • • • • • • 11 • • II w 11 • • Il • • II • • II • 2 2 .. no N N O O no O O 11 N N 11 O O 11 10 d 11 r IF II IF 1• 11 O 0 11 O F F � 11 O 0 0 O O 11 O 00 11 N N 11 O O 11 O O 00 O it N N 11 O. 1 11 O is 10 II it 11 II It 0 0 11 11 4. O • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • .,,' • • • • ♦ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • oa � I. b. P. � D. w 2 a a W W W W W W W W C A -1:7 - CO Co 0 m Co m Co Co 3 A N A A A + r ♦ A A 0 a 0 N N N N N N N N m 2 O Co V P 0 A W N - A y "0 9 9 9 m m N 2 2 9 x r r 2 r .. •• ! X V X N y X M •i 10 2 A A A •-• N v v m c r .. • y Ir II Co C7 v 3 m o x o z z 1 N A 2 A 2 2 X -4 n w a 9 C O O S• IS T .. N 2 11 ell w a m 2 w a A m n 0 n 1 ✓ m al m m . m a o r 01 r as -d 2 m m 0 a X 0 K K A A A T 9 r [000 A 2 0 •. y M n A O O S 3 000000 CO 0 2 2 O A O O V NO - - X X X X X •i W V CC * 171C O At - O O AAAN - O ✓ N S 0 44. Cl2 P ✓ - CO CO b OO P. V W O 10 10 CP N ✓ .w =I O b b b 10 V P CO a 0 10 O 10 m n - 0 < W O O O O A O CO N O O O A m ..m oA O V V N O P 0 CO CO CO N V V V -n ✓ 10 b ✓ ✓ V V V V V r V V V O a 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ( 1 1 1 1 1 1 n N .+ - P N 0 N <11 O n - O - P b A W W W n1 O - W N A b 4O t010451041 - 0 9 C t. .+ P O O N N N N N O O O O i 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 H Cr, P P 0 a P P 0 0 P CO a CO P O N - - W W W W W W W W 0 P P 0 2 N A A V V b N - L C O V W 0 O 010100100 t0 0 0 3 n b r r r r r b A m A O C 0 0 0 C A .+ n n t ✓ r n 11 II II 11 n II 11 -0 O N II 11 II 11 II n 1: 9 9 II 11 II 11 II 11 11 11 n V N N 11 II II N 11 11 m m N II N II n tl n n al u N N N N N N •- •• n al n N N Si ✓ II 0 - r 11 11 II 11 II 11 . N II ./ 9 9 O II 11 - I. It a P 11 II - - 11 N P. - in. - N W 11 r A 11 N P 0 3 A 'C 11 0 0 II V -1 11 A A II ✓ - II CO CO 11 A 0 0 0 CO W P It b 0 NO A a O 7E \ N ♦ A 11 O O OW W II A A N co O A A 0 0 0 t0 Co A N Co Co N O v — C 9 - 11 • • 11 • • 11 • • II • • N • • 11 • • • • • • • 11 • a II • • • .L 2 ✓ N O O It 0 O II 0 0 11 0 O DO O 11 P W W W b b V II 0% P 11 W t+ N +I y DO O DO O OW W DO O II O O 11 A 0 0 0 - 0 W 11 - - 11 b O t0 - 10 11 11 11 11 II 11 11 11 0 O • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • - A a a a b a a A A X X n• r r r r a. •. •• la 2 a A 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 C A D Co Co Co Co t0 CO Oo O Co 2 A N P • • ♦ t • • • • tc A O 4 4 4 4 W 4 4 4 N m 2 O V a 1T • 4 N •• O t0 A "I D N N N K X X X X X X m a A m m O M m m a ✓ z s r A A x r r K ✓ z) o r o n -1 0 o In A O a r X CO A 2 n M 01 m N is n •d Is m 0 O A D O m 2 C w t• A :3 A 33 2 r A a D 4. N A 441 n n N A D a r K O A r b M S A 2 O r •• W A m m D w m -I w A a C TO 2 o x o at r o K a .m. 2 S C .• n r As m a to a 2 A r •1 OAm PI 11 A r A 2 0 j •• al 0 0 = 2 O O N V 2 X to • • • 2 2 O A O to Co .. m •0 Co V Co r w W ♦ • • CC v m C CO CO 0 0 C C O • O O O V 4 4 3 0 \O 2 a W 0 0 a •AO 0 N 0 b - 0 • 0• IJI co A •^• o K 0 0 0 0 0 •0 0 0 o A m "N-1 ID m O A •• •. N N N N N N N N N P O t0 m r r r• •• t • w •• n •. Wm N •.4 Co 1? A 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 n 4 W a 0 •0 •C a a IT tT 0\ ... N N 0 11 •. •• 0 a O O 0 •0 • t9 CO ^ r la m O t • • • • • • In Co N r •0 r r D C O O O O • • O O O O O � O N w 2 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 H a P P a 0 0 0 0 0 a a a s a o 4 4 4 W 4 4 4 40 4 4 4 4 41 N m 2 ✓ V V V •0 •0 4 • V v N ID r N 1_ C r w 0 0 V V V O N N OD V a O X 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 D Co 10 b • • •0 •0 O O 1_ D A m V V a 0 O A 1. •t N N I_ N N r m I• 11 11 11 11 11 11 •• D C •• u it •• •• •• •• n as 11 It 11 II II 11 11 11 O ti II II U II II II II II m m II 11 11 11 11 II 11 11 11 II 11 11 11 11 11 is •• a 11 11 11 11 II 11 11 N N 11 r II II 11 11 11 11 11 .4 44 11 A A O 03 07 II 11 11 r r 11 V V 11 11 •-• •. II O O It N w X A •0 r r 11 at 4 •, II •' II 4 4 11 • • II CO Co 11 w int II Co Co II a 4 N a O A � N N b co N N II N N V II V V II • • II •• •— 11 • • 11 O O h O1 N ‘0 O G A w ! • • • . • • • • • • • • . • • . • • . • • • • • • • . • • • 2 X H ✓ V II O W N II O 00 II O O 11 Co Co 0 O m II r r II O O II O a a O -I •-1 \ 4 4 11 O 00 11 O 00 II O O II a a It N N ON N 00 O 11 CO O N W � 10 11 11 0 11 II II 11 It a o • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . ; r 2 P Y fJ C A 9 a m a o m m z o ✓ A M ro N "0 r 4 r m m et A O M r J A O Y -a a x K As (ft A Y ppfit 11A e- a 0 .. .4 14 CS Co 22 Op p N 30 1Q 0C 2 ,70, O r r 64 14 n met n N K 2 A m \-t 44m o A on T o A 1 n tl o n .• m O II r ro C ►. o .4 2 2 1 H A P O r u n 2 N L C H .. 3 O .0 CC M A m b O A ✓ c. ei a -c o u u a b It II n II 11 m m II if It to 11 •• .. It ♦ II r Y II .. 11 .. A b O 11 to It N 2 A 10 11 47 11 .0 I• b b \ II .0 ti r O C b •. 11 . II • • X. 2 `• If V II J. O H y U .0 II ON O Y ki) 11 II 1 V O i. g • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • \ r O a ro + 2 N O A on a I 1 I 'i 1 a Y a a K e v a s a o n 1 1 1' 1 -1 tY. < '7 C Cc w O �1 Y to 1 t' / m 2 b m A N A In G m ro .- o 1 �-ITS'/ XI O m F � O A In O 2 O r w o • 1 m l O Y 9 A a m N b Lk 1 r '0 C ~ w IAMY ail N b m 1+1I,'�y' qes"n m N m JO a N � O N 1�1 AN S 1 M G N m w O mil 1t C b .. O I O A '+1 a .0 Z O 1• w JD7 d 7! IQ of O ! A O N O I., In V •• m 1 g >D a X N z O m 70 1 l A ("� m -0 O Q ! 1 1 N a •I r Z T X. O 2 .+ z 9 .+ m d 9 A A 7o A O -/ d O b 70 a z q A 1 m Z m a m o x K MI C O N �1 C I I �1 O s •� 2 o i� o x O X a m i II ( pth. �t m77 a 07-1 1 v 11 m a r x• l=i 1 2 i w i A T o A a � a 1 m K m o 1 o X �} ^ 2 m r a s 2 1 2 1 O x ro I M Z a 7c O r a a ml ml ml Co �1 O A x GI 10� m z Y m A 7C gs I s 1 c o c p r ►w m 1 I 0 rn z fl a o a m a G I D d a N r 1 1 3 N N 1 r A T 9 r m I m l 1 - P q m w N w 1 m .01 .. N PM z v 77 1 JC I a ( O P 2 a 0 I N A �p�w ►� O •• 1 1 Z 1 O 01 I w a C ••I10 O 07 H 0 m C O N 2 N q 1 S C A `+ � 0 Z. ..4 77 a 2 r N 2 •• a s O 9 N 1 -1 O a •• N K a c a o � m m c X a am 1 7D M O X O A M O tit X I C Y q ICI. n z -pi oImr a O o taw = ApN r = _kto c { z m a ~o � o fv o z n .. c •4 T G N m �9 m •c 1 .� m .. ro rSi 9 A A -� A `( 2 O Or M S O {� O t- o TYO�1T- .. x v X 1 F M C /m1 P D 1 bQ n G A G �!w C S A 1) a P O 1�' l m m 9 P A .• 2 (' 2 1, C N m m 1� A a R I •[� 2 •• p .. .. 1 S 70 •' N V c !rn m 'i' r z m 1� .. .. M 1.0 C 0 2 I 2 K �� = b CO ••• m 1 I P IC � — m •• AI I 2 I x d z � • • m •• to 0 q_ ` I I 1 I r ;. ,; • • • • • • • 0 • • • 0 • • • • 4111 • • • i Xpeyl-i‘ 9//aRhO sc°•. S.TATE OF COLORADO COLORADO DEPARTMENT tO HEAL1TH-_ ' t 421O East 11th Avenue - Telelaq.; � 1 Denver,Colorado 80220.3716 1 CI'1- — ' (3031722.9076(Main auilding/Denven Phone (303) 320.8333 (3031720-1529(Ptarmigan Place/Denverl (7031 248.7198(Grand Junction Regional Office) 0 d • Roy Romer Governor COLORADO BOARD OF HEEL H Thomas M. Vernon. M.D. Executive Dlrecror AGENDA September 19, 1990 LOCATION IIME Pueblo City Hall 9:00 a.m. Council of Goverr„mants Room, 3:d Floor #1 City Hall Place Pueblo, CO 9:00 a.m. : 1. Roll Call 2. Approval of Minutes - August 15, 1990 3. Public Comment 4. Board Comment 9:15 a.m. : 5- Report of the Executive Director a. A brief review of the health status of Pueblo County • citizens, and a comparison with statewide data b. Report on meeting with Office of State Planning and • Budgeting (OSPB) to review CDH budget request 10:00 a.m. : 6. Request for approval of Regional Health Services Proposals of Boulder County and Tri-County Health Departments - Roger Donahue, Local Health Services 10:10 a.m. : 7. PUBLIC RULEMAKING HEARING: Proposed financial assurance regulations. _Subvart H. of Regulations Pertaining to Underground Storage Tanks, (permanent adoption of emergency rules adopted 7-18-90) Staff comments: Scott Winters, Hazardous Materials and Waste Management Division 10:30 a.m. : 8. PUBLIC RULEMAKING HEARING: Proposed amendments to Regulations Governing Underground Storage Tanks, sections 280.12. 280.70. 280,73 and 280 _74 Staff comments: Scott Winters 10:45 a.m. : 9. PUBLIC RULEMAKING NEARING: Proposed amendments to Regulations Pertaining to Communicable Disease Control Staff comments: Dr. Richard Hoffman, Disease Control and Environmental Epidemiology Division e3ed Note: Times stated are approximate et-/ :\CS:\°‘° STATE OF COLORADO COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 4210 East 11th Avenue Telefax: ? Denver,Colorado 80220.3716 1303)322.9076(Main Building/Denver) (�n ^'8 Phone (303) 320.8333 (303)320.1529(031 Ptarmigan Place/Denver) \��. (3 2M-7196(Grand function Regional Office) /9 6j Rov Romer NOTICE OF PUBLIC RULEMAKING HEARING eovemo, BEFORE THE Thomas M,Vernon. M.D. COLORADO BOARD OF HEALTH Enetu6ve Director • NOTICE is hereby given pursuant to the provisions of the Colorado Revised Statutes 1973, 24-4-103, that the Colorado Board of Health will conduct a public rulemaking hearing on October 17, 1990, commencing in the morning in Room 412 of the Colorado Department of Health, 4210 E. 11th Avenue, Denver, Colorado, to consider a proposed amendment to the rules pertaining to the Emergency Medical Services Account. The purpose of the hearing is to allow public comment and discussion of the proposed amendment to current rules. The proposed amendment is pursuant to CRS 25-3.5-601 which necessitates the establishment of rules for managing the Emergency Medical Services Account Grant Program. Copies of proposed amendment may be obtained by contacting the Colorado Department of Health, Emergency Medical Services Division, 4210 E. 11th Ave, Denver, Colorado 80220. Any interested person(s) shall have the opportunity to participate in the hearing by submitting written data, views, and/or comments no later than seven (7) days prior to the date of the hearing, or by presenting the same orally. Those persons submitting written data or views should submit them to: Secretary, Board of Health Colorado Department of Health 4210 E. 11th Avenue Rm 411 Denver, Colorado 80220 Dated this 21st day of August, 1990. taw lg. Thomas M. Vernon, M.D. Executive Director Colorado Department of Health STATE OF COLORADO COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH q � 421O East 11th Avenue Te'ern, ti� a )1a\' . Denver,Colorado 8O22O-3716 O03)3224076(Man Building/Denver) y7y Phone (3031 32O-8333 (303)320-15Z9(Ptarmigan Place/Denver) •A =� (303)218-7198(Grand;unction Regional Off cel �c876 Roy Romer NOTICE OF PUBLIC RULEMAEING HEARING Gmmmor BEFORE THE Thomas M.Vernon. M,D. t COLORADO BOARD OF !MAL= Enecutwe OureCtOr t NOTICE is hereby given pursuant to the provisions of the Colorado Revised Statutes 1973, 24-4-103, that the Colorado Board of Health will conduct a public rulemaking hearing on October 17, 1990, commencing in the morning in Room 412 of the Colorado Department of Health, 421O E. 11th Avenue, Denver, Colorado, to consider the promulgation of proposed amendments to the Colorado Rules and Regulations Pertaining to Radiation Control (Regulations). The purpose of this hearing is to allow the public to discuss the proposed regulatory amendments to the Parts I, IV, X and XVII of the Regulations. These amendments modify existing requirements in order to maintain compatibility with national and international criteria. The proposed amendments to the regulations have been developed by the Radiation control Division of the Department, pursuant to C.R.S. 1989, 2S-11-1O4, and are modeled after those proposed by the Conference of Radiation Control Program Directors, Inc., under the title, 'Suggested State Regulations for the Control of Radiation•. Copies of the proposed amendments to the regulations and a summary of changes to the existing regulations may be obtained by contacting the Colorado Department of Health, Radiation Control Division, 4210 E. 11th Avenue, Denver, Colorado, 80220. Any interested person shall havo the opportunity to participate in the hearing by submitting written data, views or comments not later than seven days prior to the date of the hearing, or by presenting the same orally. Persons wishing to submit any written data or views should submit them to: Secretary, Colorado Board of Health Colorado Department of Health 4210 E. 11th Avenue, Room 411 Denver, Colorado 80220 Dated this 24th day of August, 1990. 2.0-s-• nrf. J�-- AO. Thomas H. Vernon, H.D. Executive Director Colorado Department of Health NOTICE OF PUBLIC RULEMAIONG BEFORE THE COLORADO BOARD OF HEALTH NOTICE is hereby given pursuant to the provisions of Section 24.4-103, C.R.S. (1990 SuPP•) that the Colorado Board of Health will conduct a public rulemaking hearing on October 17, 1990, commencing in the morning in Room 412 of the Colorado Department of Health, 4210 East 11th Avenue, Denver, Colorado to consider the promulgation of proposed amendments to the Colorado Hazardous Waste Regulations. These amendments include (1) land disposal restrictions; (2) mining waste exclusions; (3) toxicity characteristic revisions; (4) darting strontium sulfide and iron &saran; (5) renewal of the hazardous waste manifest; (6) clarification and corrections to tank sytem regu lation4 (7) clarification of incinerator trial burn regulations; (8) miwltanrous unit requirements; (9) changes to the financial assurance regulations; (10) correction of typographical errors and inadvertent omissions. The proposed amendments to the regulations have been developed by the Committee on Hazardous Waste Regulation and the Hazardous Materials and Waste Management Division pursuant to Section 25-15-302, C.R.S. (1990). The changes in the land disposal restrictions, mining waste exclusions, toxicity characteristic revisions, hararodu s waste manifest renevral, tank system regulations, incinerator trial burn requirements, delisting of iron dextran and strontium sulfide, changes to the financail assurance regulations and miscellaneous units are based upon the Federal regulations. The correction of typographical errors and inadvertent omissions in the regulations has also been voted upon by the Cnrnmittee. These revisions are nrren ry for Colorado to maintain primary authority over the regulation of hazardous wastes within its borders. Copies may be obtained by contacting the Colorado Department of Health, Hazardous Materials and Waste Management Division, 4210 East 11th Avenue, Denser, Colorado 80720. Any interested person shall have the opportunity to participate in the hearing by submitting written data, views or comments not later than seven days prior to the date of '+e hearing, or by presenting the same orally. Persons wishing to submit any written data , 'cws should submit them to: Se,aetary, Colorado Board of Health Colorado Department of Health 4210 East 11th Avenue, Room 413 Denver, Colorado 80220 Dated this 20th day of A 1990. i At. J..,........._41:6 . Thomas M. Vernon, M.D. Executive Director Colorado Department of Health 01491C/68 TF L ^ • J ',r ,�^ Highway cra Colorado Department of Highways • ';• - .11 V 4201 E. Arkansas Ave. Denver, CO. 80222 vLa,^�, _ --I For More information: 757-9228 #90-36 Ski 6, 1990 HIGHMAT COIOaSSIONEiS SCHEDULE SEPT. 21 MELTING IN POEHLO Colorado State Highway Commissioners have scheduled a meeting in Pueblo to be held Friday, September 21 at the Holiday Inn located at 4001 N. Elizabeth Street near Interstate 25 exit 101. The meeting will be preceded by a social hour with local legislators, Pueblo county and city officials and Department of Highways staff members, held from 8 a.m. until 9 a.m. in the Aspen Room of the motor hotel. Commissioners have discontinued the Road Tripe which were weekend charter bus tours to various quadrants of the state each autumn and spring. In their place, meetings will be held outside the Denver area in selected locations which will give highway commissioners an opportunity to travel Colorado roads to a different part of the state each spring and fall evaluating conditions at their leisure. The meeting agenda will include an update regarding road and bridge conditions in Commission District 10 which represents ten southeastern Colorado counties; budget supplements to "fine tune" elements in both the Maintenance & Operations and the construction budgets; and action regarding the 1992-1996 Five Year Highway Program of Projects. ANTICIPATED II I D OPENINGS ADD: SEPTEMBER 20, 10 a.m., emergency repair of Interstate 70 from Agate eight miles southeasterly to Cedar Point, on westbound lanes, which includes removal of asphalt mat, hot bituminous pavement, emulsified asphalt, and striping, ACIR(CX) 070-4 (156) . 10:15 a.m., machine patching at ten sites in the Denver metropolitan area, consisting of removal of asphalt mat, hot bituminous pavement, bridge compression joint sealer, and pavement marking, MP 99-6000-52. -over- . q�,a�►o • Highway News/September 6 Page 2 ADD: SEPTEMBER 27, 9:45 a.m., combined project in Morgan county on U.S. 34 replacing the bridge over Beaver creek four tenths of a mile east of Brush, which includes grading, aggregate base course, hot bituminous paving, bridge, guardrail, fencing, striping, seeding and mulching, also on S.H. 52 in Fort Morgan consisting of signalization and overlay which includes removal of asphalt pavement, aggregate base course, hot bituminous pavement, Portland cement concrete pavement and signalization, projects BRE 034-3 (8) and CY 15-0052-13. 10 a.m., combined project replacing U.S. 285 bridges at the southern boundary of Lakewood, On Hampden Avenue near Kipling Street and near Estes Street, consisting of grading, hot bituminous pavement, bridges, drainage, guardrail, and pavement marking, projects BRF 285-4(41) and CXBRF 11-0285-23. 10:15 a.m., upgrading signals and adding a northbound left turn storage lane (to westbound) at Vasquez Blvd. and East 56th Avenue near Sand Creek in Commerce City, consisting of hot bituminous pavement, curb and gutter, signalization, signing and striping, HES 0006(44) . 10:30 a_ -, improving the Vasquez Blvd. intersection with East 69th Avenue in Commerce City, which includes grading, hot bituminous pavement, drainage, sidewalk, curb and gutter, signalization, signing, striping, seeding and mulching, MP-CC 12-0085-06. PROJECTS AWARDED PROJECT: AWARDED TO: DATE: MP 99-4000-25 western Mobile-Holdings, 8/23/90 bid MP 99-4000-27 Inc. d/b/a western Mobile 8/27/90 award Machine Patching, Greeley Northern, Inc and Brush Area $431,868 Zero Goals ..v 1 00: 1: . BOARD OF ASSESSMENT APPEALS,,, cr-, � i f" STATE OF COLORADO Docket Number 11010 Cl_r- T0 i ORDER JOHN HOYMAN, Petitioner, vs. WELD COUNTY BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, Respondent. THIS MATTER was heard by the Board of Assessment Appeals on August 13. 1990, Lisa M. Shay and Curtis Wells presiding. Petitioner did not appear and was not represented by counsel . Respondent was represented by Jan Allison, Esq. FINDINGS OF FACT: 1 . Subject property is described as follows: SEE ATTACHMENT 1 2. Petitioner is protesting the 1989 actual value of the subject property. 3. Petitioner did not present any evidence at the hearing . CONCLUSIONS: 1. The written documentation filed by Petitioner was insufficient for the Board to make a decision as to the 1989 actual value of the subject property. ' 2. Petitioner failed to meet the burden of proof, in accordance with the Board' s Rule 14. }-' RDER: 1 44111/4;\‘ k° R-x )64. ;� 1 1 ll The petition is dismissed. DATED this _ 12i day of September, 1990. BOARD OF ASSESSMENT APPEALS Li a M. Curtis Wells I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of the decision of the Board essmSCM t Appeal 9am9MIIesCR C��/,(��f�L R. Sharp 11010.J1 2 - SCHEDULE RULE OF PROPERTIES Address Parcel Number 2530-2532 3rd St. Greeley, Co. 80631 095901112013 3016 & 3020 Denver St. Evans, Co. 80620 096120210009 3024 Denver St. Evans, Co. 80620 096120210004 917 12th St. Greeley, Co. 80631 096108204007 921 12th St. Greeley, Co. 80631 096108204006 2953 State Farm Rd. Evans, Co. 80620 096120219009 1718-1720 2nd St. Greeley, Co. 80631 096106211001 1227 13th Ave. Greeley, Co. 80631 096107108014 ATTACHMENT 1 nollimmola STATE OF COLORADO BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND EMPLOYS,Pi :'_:'' : , DIVISION OF LABOR P" In the Matter of the Claim of Claimant, vs. Empt°yer. NOTICE OF HEARING !maw. _ 1 paepondente. TAKE NOTICE THAT THIS MATTER HAS BEEN SCHEDULED FOR HEARING on at M.at CO at which time you must be prepared to present your evidence concerning the issues to be heard. NOTE THE FOLLOWING r� . a Claimant's failure to attend the hearing may result in the claim being dismissed. All parties have the right to be represent- ed by an attorney at the hearing.Corporate' Officers may not represent their corpora- tion. The issues to be determined by the hearing are those set forth in the Application for Hearing and Response r , to Application for Hearing. Requests for a continuance must be . : received by the Docket Office by tele- phone at least 25 days prior to the hear- . / ing. It is the requesting party's respon- sibility to nOtify ail parties and witnesses of the continuance. Parties and attorneys must keep the Workers'Compensation Section informed of any change of address pending final -. ' • disposition of this case. • 01* Attorney/Firm Name Issuing Notice °pies of this Notice of Hearing were served upon the above partlwe by maiiing s copy thereof Addreee to each ot them,postage prepaid,On _ City State Zip If this section Is blank then notice was Issued by DIVP Signature skin of Labor RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS MINUTES BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO SEPTEMBER 12, 1990 TAPE *90-33 The Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, met in regular session in full conformity with the law and bylaws of said Board at the regular place of meeting in the Weld County Centennial Center, Greeley, Colorado, September 12, 1990, at the hour o£ 9:00 A.M. ROLL CALL: The meeting was called to order by the Chairman and on roll call the following members were present, constituting a quorum of the members thereof: Commissioner Gene R. Brantner, Chairman Commissioner George Kennedy, Pro-Tem Commissioner Constance L. Harbert Commissioner C.W. Kirby Commissioner Gordon E. Lacy Also present: Weld County Attorney, Thomas O. David Acting Clerk to the Board, Tommie Antuna MINUTES: Commissioner Kennedy moved to approve the minutes of the Board of County Commissioners meeting of September 10, 1990, as printed. Commissioner Harbert seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. ADDITIONS: There were no additions to today's agenda. CONSENT AGENDA: Commissioner Kennedy moved to approve the consent agenda as printed. Commissioner Harbert seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. DEPARTMENT HEADS AND ELECTED OFFICIALS: Gary McCabe, Ambulance Director, said his department is financially in batter shape than last year. Mr. McCabe said that September 16 through 22 is Emergency Medical Services Week. He concluded his report by commending Julie Ouska, Information Services Department, for the fine work she has been doing in helping the Ambulance Services. WARRANTS: Don Warden presented the following warrants for approval by the Board: General fund 5112,892.02 Social Services 5,859.87 Commissioner Kennedy moved to approve the warrants as presented by Mr. Warden. Commissioner Harbert seconded the motion which carried unanimously. BIDS: PRESENT 15-PASSENGER VANS - HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT: Mr. Warden read the names of the bidders, and the amount bid by each, into the record. He said this item is to be considered for approval on September 26. B Coo/o, BUSINESS: OLD: CONSIDER PROTEST CONCERNING MOWING SERVICES BY PEST AND WEED DEPARTMENT - EICHLER (CONT. FROM 9/5/90) : Bruce Barker, Assistant County Attorney, presented this matter to the Board. Ron Breda, Pest Inspector, explained the proceedings for entering upon lands to effect the control or eradication of noxious weeds. Mr. Breda said the first notice was sent to Mr. Eichler in May and he had not yet complied by June 29. Haiko Eichler, property owner, requested dismissal of this matter, stating that the Johnstown Pest Control District has never been established. Chairman Brantner said that testimony concerning the establishment of the Johnstown Pest Control District would not be considered at this meeting. He said the only issue the Board would consider today would be the request by Mr. Eichler to dismiss the cost of the mowing services. Mr. Barker recommended that the Board hear the testimony from Mr. Eichler. Mr. Eichler gave his presentation. Following discussion, Commissioner Lacy moved to deny the protest by Haiko Eichler, and that the total charges of $178.50 be paid by him. Seconded by Commissioner Kennedy, the motion carried unanimously. NEW: CONSIDER PURCHASE OF SERVICES AGREEMENTS FOR DENTAL SERVICES AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN: Marilyn Carlin°, representing the Department of Human Resources, said these Agreements are with Christopher Wood, D.D.S, and Mark R. Smith, D.D.S. Ma. Carlin° said Drs. Wood and Smith will take the Head Start children who cannot be seen at Sunrise Health Center. Commissioner Lacy moved to approve both Agreements and authorize the Chairman to sign. Commissioner Kennedy seconded the motion which carried unanimously. CONSIDER SETTING PRELIMINARY HEARING DATE FOR LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT - BASSWOOD AVENUE: Commissioner Lacy moved to set the preliminary hearing date for said Local Improvement District as October 3, 1990, at 10:00 A.M. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Xennedy, and it carried unanimously. CONSIDER REQUEST TO PREADVERTISE AMENDED SUP - ROGGEN FEEDLOT/HESSEE: Commissioner Lacy moved to approve said request for preadvertisement and set the hearing date as October 10, 1990, at 10:00 A.M. Seconded by Commissioner Harbert, the motion carried unanimously. CONSIDER RESOLUTION RE: CANCEL PAYROLL FUND WARRANTS FOR AUGUST, 1990: Commissioner Lacy moved to approve said Resolution. Commissioner Kirby seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. PLANNING: CONSIDER RESOLUTION RE: VIOLATIONS or THE ZONING AND BUILDING CODE ORDINANCES - JUNGLA, RUCKER, AND BUZZARD; FIECHTNER; STEWART; AND LYONS: Commissioner Kennedy moved to approve this Resolution authorizing the County Attorney to proceed with legal action against Vincent & Irene Jungle, JUnita L. Rucker, and Earl & Kathy Buzzard; Douglas R. Fiechtnert James & Betty Stewart and Carl & Susan Lyons for violations of the weld County Zoning and Building Code Ordinances. Commissioner Kirby seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. Minutes - September 12, 1990 Page 2 ZPMH 01679 - MARTINEZ: Brian Grubb, representing the Department of Planning Services, said this request from Vincente Martinez is for one mobile home to be used as a principal dwelling. Mr. Grubb said the Planning staff recommends approval subject to four Conditions, which he read into the record. Vincente Martinez, the applicant, came forward to answer questions of the Board. Mr. Martinez explained that both of these mobile homes will be used by members of his family. Commissioner Lacy moved to approve ZPMH 01679 subject to the recommended Conditions. The motion, which was seconded by Commissioner Kirby, carried unanimously. ZPMH 01680 - MARTINEZ: Mr. Grubb said this request from Vincente Martinez is for one mobile home to be used as a principal dwelling. He said the recommendation of the Planning staff is for approval subject to five Conditions. Mr. Martinez answered questions of the Board. Commissioner Harbert moved to approve ZPMH 01680 subject to the Conditions as recommended. Seconded by Commissioner Kirby, the motion carried unanimously. RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES: The Resolutions were presented and signed as listed on the consent agenda. There were no Ordinances. Let the minutes reflect that the above and foregoing actions were attested to and respectfully submitted by the Acting Clerk to the Board. There being no further business, this meeting was adjourned at 9:50 A.M. �f� / /1imAL APPROVED: I (�ATTEST: tn'ah BOARD P COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD ,, COLO Weld County Clerk to the Board �/L ne R. Brantn r, Chairman B �, z ,� Deputy Clerk to(the Board Ge a Kennedy, Pro-Tem / cane L. HarberL. Harbert c.tT it by fe Gold c Minutes - September 12, 1990 Page 3 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AGENDA Monday, September 17, 1990 Tape 490-34 ROLL CALL: Gene R. Brantner, Chairman George Kennedy, Pro-Tem Constance L. Harbert C.W. Kirby Gordon E. Lacy MINUTES: Approval of minutes of September 12, 1990 CERTIFICATIONS OF HEARINGS: Hearings conducted on September 12, 1990: 1) Amended Special Review Permit, Jefferson; 2) Change of Zone, City of Longmont; and 3) Change o£ Zone, Flatiron Structures/Azalea Farms ADDITIONS TO AGENDA: None APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA: PRESENTATION: 1) Recognition of Services - Bernice Walker COMMISSIONER COORDINATOR 1) Communication Services - Lacy REPORTS: 2) Engineering Services - Kirby 3) Health Services - Harbert 4) Planning Services - Kennedy S) Purchasing & Personnel - Brantner COUNTY FINANCE OFFICER: 1) Warrants (Donald Warden) BUSINESS: NEW: 1) Consider Purchase of Services Agreement between FENWC and School District RE-1 and authorize Chairman to sign 2) Consider Agreement for Sampling and Analysis of Pollutant Discharge 3) Consider accepting various liens from Town of Severance 4) Consider Resolution re: Temporary closure of WCR 54 between WCR IS and 17 5) Consider Resolution re: Appointment o£ Janie Webster to Human Resources Committee 6) Consider Resolution re: Declare certain equipment as surplus property 7) Consider Second Reading of Ordinance No. 119-6, In the Matter of an Amendment to Ordinance No. 119, Weld County Building Code Ordinance. PLANNING: 1) Consider Resolution re: Building Code Ordinance Violations - Decbant CONSENT AGENDA APPOINTMENTS: Sep 17 - work Session 10:00 AM Sep 18 - E911 Telephone Authority Doard 12:00 NOON Sep 18 - Retirement Board 2:15 PM Sep 18 - Airport Authority 3:00 PM Sep 20 - Placement Alternatives Commission 12:00 NOON Sep 24 - work Session 10:00 AM Sep 24 - NCMC Board of Trustees 12:00 NOON Sep 25 - Health Board 9:00 AM Sep 25 - Housing Authority 11:30 AM Sap 25 - Communications Board 2:00 PM Sep 25 - Airport Authority 3:00 PM Sep 26 - EDAP 7:00 AM Sep 27 - Front Range Budget Conference Sep 27 - Human Resources Committee 9:00 AM Sep 28 - Front Range Budget Conference Sep 28 - Centennial Development Services 8:00 AM Sep 28 - Extension Board 11:00 AM • HEARINGS: Sep 19 - Change of Ownership of Special Review Permit, Children's Shelter Home in A (Agricultural) Zone District, Chester Price 10:00 AM Sep 19 - Certificate of Designation, Sludge composting facility in the A (Agricultural) Zone District, City of Longmont 10:00 AM Sep 19 - Certificate of Designation, Roggen Disposal, Inc. 10:00 AM Oct 3 - Special Review Permit, Home business (plumbing shop) in the A (Agricultural) Zone District, George W., III, and Barbara J. Corman 10:00 AM Oct 3 - Amended Special Review Permit and Certificate of Designation, Biomedical waste incineration facility, Jamison Tool, Inc., and Wixco Services, Inc. 10:00 AM Oct 3 - Amended Special Review Permit and Certificate of Designation, Tire landfill, storage, and recycling facility, Tire Mountain, Inc. 10:00 AM Oct 3 - Preliminary Hearing, Local Improvement District, Basswood Avenue 10:00 AM Oct 10 - Spacial Review Permit, Agricultural service establishment, James and Janice Schmidtbauer 10:00 AM Oct 10 - Special Review Permit, Expansion of existing church in R-2 (Duplex Residential) Zone District, Mount Calvary Lutheran Church 10:00 AM Oct 10 - Amended Special Use Permit, Expansion of commercial cattle feedlot (12,400 head) , Roggen Feedlot/Richard Hessee 10:00 AM Nov 7 - Show Cause Hearing, Richard Hessee (cont. from 8/29/90) 10:00 AM REPORTS: 1) Mary Ann Feuerstein, Clerk and Recorder, re: Collection of Clerk Fees COMMUNICATIONS: 1) Weld County Builders re: combining inspection departments of City of Greeley and Weld County 2) Notices of Claim #1120655: #1120758 3) Notice of Public Trustee Sale #3859 4) Notice of Claim, N.J. Leftin & Leftin Investment Co. 5) Notice of Injury re: Robert L. Hettinger and Nancy Hettinger 6) Mined Land Reclamation Division re: File No. M-90-119; File No. M-90-124 7) Department of Local Affairs re: #90-738 Weld County Housing Project 8) Notice of Attorney's Lien re: Brenda Irene Ramos 9) Board of Assessment Appeals Orders re: Wooley; Silchias Ruscitti: Giles; and Pineda & Sons, Inc. 10) Petition of Marvin F. Peer & Company to Board of Assessment Appeals 11) State Department of taw re: Insurance Antitrust Litigation Notice of Retention of Documents 12) Worker's Compensation re: Daniel D. Harsh 11) Weld County Council Minutes of September 5, 1990 Meeting Continued on Page 2 of Consent Agenda Monday, September 17, 1990 Page 2 of Consent Agenda RESOLUTIONS: * 1) Deny protest concerning mowing services by Pest and Weed Department - Eichler * 2) Set preliminary hearing date for local improvement district - Basswood Avenue • 3) Approve request to preadvertise Amended SDP - Roggen Feedlot/Hessee * 4) Approve zPMH #1679 - Martinez • 5) Approve ZPMH #1680 - Martinez + 6) Approve Amended Special Review Permit - Jefferson * 7) Approve Change of Zone - City of Longmont • 8) Approve Change of Zone - Flatiron Structures/Azalea Farms * 9) Authorize County Attorney to proceed with legal action - Building Code Violations * 10) Approve declaring certain equipment as surplus property • 11) Approve temporary closure of WCR 54 between WCR 15 and 17 * 12) Approve appointment of Janie Webster to Human Resources Committee PRESENTATION: * 1) Recognition of Services - Bernice Walker AGREEMENT: * 1) Sampling and Analysis of Pollutant Discharge ORDINANCE: 1) Second Reading of Ordinance No. 119-6, In the Matter of an Amendment to Ordinance No. 119, Weld County Building Code Ordinance * Signed at this meeting Monday, September 17, 1990 RESOLUTION RE: FINDINGS AND ORDER CONCERNING MOWING SERVICES - HAIKO EICHLER WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, on the 12th day of September, 1990, the Board considered the protest o£ Mr. Haiko Eichler for mowing services which were performed on his property to control or eradicate certain noxious weeds, and WHEREAS, the Board did deny said protest, as evidenced in the Findings and Order, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners o£ Weld County, Colorado, that the protest of Mr. Haiko Eichler be, and hereby is, denied. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that, pursuant to said denial of protest, Mr. Haiko Eichler is directed to pay the sum o£ $178.50 for the mowing services performed on his property. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 12th day of September, A.D. , 1990. 4017 BOARD COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST- 4 ? WELD LINTY, COL O Weld County Clerk to the Board it I r ene R. Brantner, Cha rman r -- �W`v'^-�--- 13Y-�J ml� r7� l 1xtt it z George Kennedy, Pro-Tem ~ Tputy Clerk to the Board J 0..tw APPROVED AS TO FORM: ns ance L. Har ert C.�Kekee i „!-!�/�- l ,-��r County Attorney rite Go 900839 rswti� EZOO/a ec. acko,i CA; �ct FINDINGS AND ORDER OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY, COLORADO WHEREAS, on or about July 19, 1990, Mr. Haiko Eichler was mailed an itemized statement by certified mail by the Weld County Pest Inspector, Ronald J. Broda, for mowing services, pursuant to Section 35-5-108 (3) , C.R.S. , and WHEREAS, Mr. Eichler has protested the itemized statement, pursuant to Section 35-5-108 (4) , C.R.S. , by submitting to the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County a written protest which was received by the Board on or about August 14, 1990 , and WHEREAS, Mr. Eichler' s protest was originally set for hearing before the Board of County Commissioners on September 5, 1990, but was continued to September 12, 1990, at Mr. Eichler's request. The Board, having heard the testimony of Haiko Eichler, Ronald J. Broda, and Bruce T. Barker, Assistant Weld County Attorney, MAKES THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS: 1. That on May 8, 1990, Ronald J. Broda, Weld County Pest Inspector, mailed to Mr. Eichler a "Ten (10) Day Notice," pursuant to Section 35-5-108 (1) , C.R.S. , which informed Mr. Eichler that Canada Thistle and Musk Thistle existed and needed to be controlled on property owned by Mr. Eichler and located in the Northwest Quarter of Section 32, Township 4 North, Range E8 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. Said Notice required Mr. Eichler to mow the weeds prior to May 18, 1990. Said Notice also advised Mr. Eichler that if the mowing was not completed by May 18, 1990, Mr. Broda would ask the Board of County Commissioners to approve his entry upon the parcel to control or eradicate the noxious weeds, pursuant to Section 35-5-108(2) , C.R.S. , at Mr. Eichler's expense, as provided by Section 35-5-108 (3) , C.R.S. 2. That Mr. Eichler failed to perform said mowing prior to May 18, 1990. 9C0533 3. That on May 25, 1990, the Board of County Commissioners authorized Mr. Broda' s Right o£ Entry onto the property owned by Mr. Eichler in order to perform the mowing of said noxious weeds. 4. That Mr. Broda contacted Mr. Eichler and his wife at least twice through mid-June. Mr. Eichler stated that he would control the Musk Thistle on his property. 5. That on June 26, 1990, Mr. Broda mailed a second Notice to Mr. Eichler, informing him that he must control all of the Musk Thistle on his property by either chemical spraying or by mowing by Friday, June 29, 1990. 6. That by July 11, 1990, Mr. Eichler had not yet sprayed or mowed said noxious weeds. Therefore, Mr. Broda arranged for Peregoy Sons Landscaping and Excavating to perform the mowing work. Mr. Fred Peregoy performed said work on July 11, 1990, and on July 13, 1990. A total of four (4) acres were mowed. The total mowing time was four (4) hours. 7. That upon receiving a bill from Peregoy Sons Landscaping and Excavating for said mowing, Mr. Broda prepared an itemized statement dated July 19, 1990, which included the following: 4 hours of mowing at $35.00 per hour $140.00 Set up fee $ 30.00 5$ Administrative fee $ 8.50 Total due $178.50 Said itemized statement was mailed by certified mail by Mr. Broda to Mr. Eichler. 8. That Mr. Eichler was informed at the start of said protest hearing that the issue presented, pursuant to Section 35-5-108 (4) , C.R.S. , was whether the itemized statement of expense was correct. 2 SC C839 9. That Mr. Eichler presented no testimony or evidence which proved that the itemized statement was incorrect. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the itemized statement of expense for said mowing work shall remain $178.50. Mr. Eichler' s protest is denied. It is fuxther ordered that Mr. Eichler must pay to the Weld County Treasurer the sum of $178.50 no later than thirty (30) days following the signing of this Order, pursuant to Section 35-5-108 (5) , C.R.S. This Findings and Order shall be filed with the Weld County Assessor. ?f Mr. Eichler does not pay the sum of $178.50 to the Weld County Treasurer within said thirty (30) day period, the Weld County Assessor is then Ordered, pursuant to Section 35-5-108 (5) , C.R.S. , to extend the amount of $178.50 upon the assessment and said sum shall thereby constitute a lien against the entire tract owned by Mr. Eichler and located in the Northwest Quarter of Section 32, Township 4 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. , Meld County, Colorado. DONE this 12th day of September, 1990. rfl �� /J BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS w/fin OF WELD COUNTY, COLORADO ATTEST: W/7 BY �/ 67 inc e q .f.c O.-1 BY: /G t erk C o the Board ene R. Bran ner�an �1 APPROVED AS TO FORM: B • - ` e d County Attorney PC Cr:7a3' 9 3 NOTICE Pursuant to Section 35-5-108 (4) , Colorado Revised Statutes, as amended, notice is hereby given that a hearing will be held before the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, on the 5th day of September, 1990, at or about 9:00 a.m. , in the First Floor Hearing Room, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado, at which time the Board will hear the evidence upon the protest concerning the mowing services by the Weld County Pest and Weed Department. All interested persons should appear at said hearing and give testimony as to whether or not the mowing services by the Weld County Pest and Weed Department are satisfactory. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO BY: DONALD D. WARDEN COUNTY CLERK TO THE BOARD BY: Shelly Miller, Deputy DATED: August 15, 1990 900802 P 556 982 972 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL run. HAIKO EICHLER 18680 WELD COUNTY ROAD 3 BERTHOUD, CO 80513 Postage s Certified Fee $pedal Delivery Fee Restricted Delivery Fee Return Receipt showing to whom and Date Delivered 3 Return Receipt showing whom, Dale,and Address of 0 very qq5 TOTAL POStage and Fees $ g DOSImad or Date E 7/90 f�lY��. • SENDER: Complete items 1 and eI..2 when aciditi services are (isfrw anti Comps Its 3 and 4. • put your address in the"RETURN TO"Spade on the reverse side,failure to do this will prevent this card from beep returned to you.-D a_! rn receipt foe win prOviDe you the name p} fieDereon detiverod and n dallv2ry.For additiIona—T fees the following services are Ewa,able.Lonauit POstma6lM or endchock bairns)for addRNfnal serve:elr0 retivested. 1. C Show to whom delivered,date,Mora end end :address.. 2- C � e/Wary 3. Article Addressed to:,,._ 4. Ami:b�� ber —91A HAIKO EICHLER Tip.of Service:. 18680 WELD COUNTY ROAD 3 `J Registered ' n Insured BERTHOUD, CO 80513 0 Express O RaD2um Reaipt Express Mail ❑}pn Mefdhsndlee Always Oataidl7gnature of addresses or agent s ldpaLE .IVERED. 5. Sip ro —r dd 8. Add �ktAdd( 1 (ONLY if X lA1\/ �J / Jr �i . Paid 8. Sip re —Agent i ; y X 7. Date of Delivery C. ' ,PS Form 3811,Apr. 1989 suS.o,e,0.1es►Ode41a DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT fiEL 1790 ix 31 CLERK TO hE BOARD , SSi 54QM:�- C "GT . ht, f( 1v) Vim 4-t4, fad- ireme refuel ea( de:au-LA.\ v,04 avaUloi . A` )use- ee/1; 0%)k*L- ci cif io ae Cm“,vgcs- 6 -c �� a. cue +� �, 3/42_iyo 7-LamkYcp.A ere _ corah91A . 4,4 oak, C._ info c0Ci —g 'ergo 2kAdr 6t, POS- 1_ s3s- 91 9C0839 - ,. - -- \Nan �p\r,41( cps=;A7 c 26 ^i t^ \UG Board of CountyCOmmissippers August 23rd, 1990 Weld County Colorado C r O‘0 ,0 PO Box 758 iO1\2\c-v , Greeley, Co 80632 Gentlemen: In preparation for my hearing scheduled for September 5th, 1990 I would like to request the following items: Copies of: 1) The petition on file to establish a pest control district.(CRS 35-5-104) 2) Verification of such petition during a regular or special session of the Board(CRS 35-5-104,2) 3) Copy of a ballot mailed to affected land owners and lessees.(CBS 35-5-104,3) 4) Verification that 66 2/3% of affected Land owners and lessees voted in favor of the establishment of such a district. 5) Competitive bids from all contractors and last date thereof. 6) Any requests for anexation by owners or lessees adjoining an established post control district. 7) Any petitions by a district advisory committe of 2 or more adjoining post control districts requesting consolidation. 8) The roster of the advisory committee. 9) Tho last annual report by tho post control inspector to the board. 10) Approval of the Board of County Commissioners to enter land (CRS 35-5-108,2). 11) Itemized Statement. nkXo , � iko Eichler 18680 WCR 3 Berthoud,CO 80513 SC V Se3J MELD COUVIY CON;r;SS'07RS f99Q Pir; 14 All a 45 CLERK TO THE BOARD Weld County Board o£ Commissioners 8/8/90 425 n.15th ave. Greeley, CO 80631 Gentlemen: Pursuant with CRS 35-5-108, paragraph 4 I would like to file herewith a written protest concerning the statement I received on or about the 3rd of August, 1990 for mowing services by t Weld County pest & Wedd Department. nc iko ichler ` 18680 WCR 3 Berthoud, Co. 80513 (303)535-4938 2C0833 fly vT 1 (L ^1r7 � i _ � r ,MELD COUNTY PEST AND WEED DEPARTMENT fat rc "Di ^';i !•r 2� �� C 5 425 NORTH 15TH AVENUE V EXHIBITION BUILDING, ISLAND GROVE PARK CLLr„‘ GREELEY,COLORADO 80691 TO EDI:3 PHONE NUMBER(903)356-4000. EXT.4465 Ci COLORADO Memorandum August 28, 1990 T0: Board of Weld County Commissioners FROM: " '° `77 Ronald J. Broda, Weld County Pest Inspector Re: Protest Hearing Requested by Mr. Haiko Eichler Mr. Eichler is protesting a weed control enforcement bill of $178.50 (attached) , according to the Pest Control Districts Law CRS 35-5-108(4). I would like to inform you, prior to the hearing, as to what was done with Mr. Eichler's property. On May 8, 1990 I sent a 10 day notice (attached) to Mr. Eichler informing him that he had Canada and Musk Thistle on his property that had to be controlled. On May 25th, I submitted a letter to the County Commissioners (attached) requesting right-of-entry on a number of properties, including Mr. Eichler's. Right of entry was approved by the Board on May 30th (attached) . Contact was initiated with Mr. and Mrs. Eichler at least twice through mid June. Mr. Eichler had stated that he would control the thistle on his property. On June 25, I had noticed that Mr. Eichler had sprayed only one half of his pasture. Based upon a recommendation by County Attorney Bruce Barker, I sent another letter to Mr. Eichler (attached) explaining his non-compliance with the Pest Control Districts Law. Additional telephone communication was initiated with Mrs. Eichler in early July. Mrs. Eichler stated that the thistle would be taken care of. No additional control measures were initiated by July 11th so I brought the contractor into the Eichler property. A total of 4 acres were mowed. Every year we have a problem with this landowner. They do nothing or the very minimum and when they do it is always done late. We could have enforced on them back in early June, however, we were trying to work with them since they said they would take care of the problem. We ultimately enforced control on their property two months and 3 days after the first legal notice was sent to them. If you need any additional information or clarification prior to next Wednesdays hearing, please do not hesitate to call me at ext. 4465. 2CG 333 NOTICE OF THE NEED FOR CONTROL OR ERADICATION F US WEEDS, H. & M.S. Eichler 18680 WCR 3 Berthoud CO 80513 Be advised that I, Ron Broda, Weld County Pest Inspector hereby give you notice in accordance with Section 35-5-108(1) , CRS, of the presence of noxious weeds, specifically MMs1( TUISTI.F (Carduus nutans) and CANADA THISTLE (Cirsium arvense) on a parcel of land which is owned, leased, and/or occupied by you, and is described as follows: Legal - T4N R68W SEC 32 PT NW4 i Parcel - 106132000063 This land is in the Johnstown Pest Control Districts. When musk thistle is in the rosette stage and Canada thistle is in the seedling stage they are easiest to control. The best method of control or eradication is so us.e herbicides that are labeled for rbe specific ward lark sire. nr by mechanical means such as mowing four to five tjmes during the Summer., The plants must _be kept from veins to seed If you need help with herbicide rates please feel free to call me at 356-4000 _2xt 4465 Pursuant to Section 35-5-108(1) , CRS. you are required to use one of these methods to control or eradicate these weeds. ' If you do not comply with the aforementioned required by May 18. 1990, or call me about establishing a Control program. I will ask the Weld County Board of County Commissioners to approve my entry upon such parcel to control or eradicate such noxious weeds, pursuant to Section 35-5-108(2) , CRS, at your expense, as provided in Section 35-5-108(3) , CRS. May 8, 1990 Ronald J Broda Weld County Pest Inspector 900833 t WELD COUNTY PEST AND WEED DEPARTMENT Irf1 425 NORTH 15TH AVENUE �+ EXHIBITION&AWING.ISLAND GRove Root GREELEY.COLORADO 80631 PHONE NumBE11(303)3564000,Eat 485 !milk • COLORADO June 26, 1990 Mr H Eichler 18680 WCR 3 Berthoud CO 80513 Dear Mr Eichler, I am writing to inform you that you have not complied with the weed control notice I sent dated May 8, 1990, nor have you compiled with CRS 35-5-102 of the Fest Control District Taw. If you have not controlled ALL the musk thistle on your property, either by chemical or mowing, by Friday June 22,_1191, I will. enforce control on your property at your expense. I hope that I do not have to resort to this measure. Sincerely, Ronald J Broda Weld County Pest Inspector a.'0839 tit e(Adv RESOLUTION RE: APPROVE ENTRY BY WELD COUNTY PEST INSPECTOR UPON VARIOUS LANDS WHEREAS, the Board o£ County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, on May 8, and/or 15, 1990, Ron Broda, Weld County Pest inspector, mailed notices to various landowners within Weld County advising them that lands owned or occupied by them contain Canada thistle, musk thistle, and/or leafy spurge, noxious weeds, and WHEREAS, said notices stated that the Canada thistle, musk thistle, and/or leafy spurge, noxious weeds, must be controlled or eradicated within ten days from the date of said notices, and gave recommendations as to what methods are to be used for such control or eradication, and WHEREAS, a copy of said list, containing the legal descriptions of the lands, and the names of those landowners who have failed to comply with said recommendations, is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and WHEREAS, the County Pest Inspector has requested that the Board approve his entry upon lands, as set forth in said list, to effect the control or eradication of Canada thistle, musk thistle, and/or leafy spurge, noxious weeds, and WHEREAS, at its meeting of May 30, 1990, the Board did Find as follows: 1) That those landowners mentioned on the list are the owners of said land within a pest control district; 2) That Canada thistle, musk thistle, and/or leafy spurge, noxious weeds, are found upon said lands; 3) That said landowners received appropriate notice and such notice specified the best available means for control or eradication of Canada thistle, musk thistle, and/or leafy spurge, noxious weeds; and 4) That said landowners have not complied with the requirements as stated by the County Pest Inspector, and WHEREAS, pursuant to said Findings the Board deems it advisable to approve the entry by Ron Breda, weld County Pest Inspector, upon said lands described in the list attached hereto, to effect the control or eradication of Canada thistle, musk thistle, and/or leafy spurge, noxious weeds. • ,' - 1 2O0933 /7. :,rte 900457 414'- .. Page 2 RE: ENTRY UPON LANDS NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of weld County, Colorado, that the Board does hereby approve the entry by Ron Breda, Weld County Pest Inspector, upon various lands as set forth in the list attached hereto to effect the control or eradication o£ Canada thistle, musk thistle, and/or leafy spurge, noxious weeds. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 34th day of May, A.D. , 1990. BO COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: WEL Y, CO Weld County C erk and Recorder inv N t and Clerk to the Board ene�R. Br�aan r,hhaxrman hk ra r i l r 1, yr a i George xegneay, Prnelr yeputy County C(.2 /T 1 APPROVED AS TO FORM: onstance L. Har er Cs- 1 --ae— • C. xi, y l County Attorney Gordon . .C0B33 900457 WELD COUNTY PEST AND WEED DEPARTMENT tzt 1 I` 625 NORTH iSTX AVENUE EXHIBITION &gpNG ISLAND 611012 PMIt GREELEY.CaolU00 80631 PHONE NUMBER(303)356-4000. ExT.666.5 wilge COLORADO Dear Weld County Commissioners: May 25, 1990 Under the Pest Control District Law, CRS, 35-5-108, I must seek approval or a right o£ entry from the Board of County Commissioners to enter on private land to carry out weed control measures. Below is a list of landowners, and the legal description of their land, that we may have to enforce on. I am seeking your approval to enter upon these lands. Liao. Legal EAres1 TOLLGATE FARMS INC T5N R67W SEC 29 W2 NE4 095729000016 TIACI, INC T3N R67W SEC 6 W2 NW4 120906000025 T3N R67W SEC 6 NW4 120906000003 T4N R68W SEC 36 PT SE4 106136000042 106136000044 MARK & CARY BOOTH T2N R68W SEC 1 NW4 NW4 131301000015 WILLIAM COOPER T4N R68W SEC 32 106132000019 HIGHLAND DITCH CO T3N R68W SEC 22 120722000041 T3N R68W SEC 21 SE4 120721000016 H. & M.S. EICHLER T4N R68W SEC 32 PT NW4 106132000063 KENNETH R. WHITNEY T6N R67W SEC 30 NE4 080730000017 PHYLLIS KETLER-GARDNER T6N R66W SEC 36 SW4 SW4 080536000004 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD T3N R67W SEC 32 T4N R67W SEC 3 T5N R67W SEC 28, 29 33 & 34 ' (ALONG RAILROAD RICHT-OF-WAY) RUBIN REI.MER & SAM TELUP T4N R67W SEC 5 $2 SW4 105905300008 LEONARD & SIDNEY STREAR T4N R66W SEC 33 NW4 NV4 105733000043 GEORGE C ADAM JR T2N R68W SEC 4 NE4 131304000022 131304000044 ST. VRAIN LTD T2N R68W SEC 9 E2 SE4 131309000069 131309000071 CRS INVESTMENTS INC T2N R68W SEC 5 W2 NE4 131305000023 DAVID HENDERSON T4N R67W SEC 3 NE4 105903000001 T4N R67W SEC 4 NE4 NE4 105904000003 The weed notices were mailed on either May 8 or 15, 1990, requesting control of one or more of the following weed species: Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense), musk thistle (Cardillo nutans) and/or leafy spurge (Euyhorbia esulal. Enclosed are copies of two of the notices sent on the different dates. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, cw4Ac n sC 083 Ronald J. Broda Weld County Pest Inspector 900457 STATEMENT Date ��Y /91 /y90 TO /t . V 14, S. C/cAFGkt ADDRESS /n,g0 laci 3 _ CITY 7( E7aTtioci • `D . cS73 Payable to: WELD COUNTY WEED CONTROL 425 N. 15th Avenue Greeley CO 80631 4L7g, el010/MG er4S'Ov/ (e. f et'ap • ger-v n Ae 30,E 30.00 527 tilny •;v. ?.CD 1-1/11 7/44.-- A err, ai/Thgctfil417_ of k4•15 an177-oC_ vAtsmit '7!/E f£5Tac ritc- -me:'s zAw/(lS 3T r �a�4 oh" Yuz 41RrY Al./otos/¢s Sac �/06/3�ooO oil 7 me earck`5a T:/4 teak- Toalc mat . V/Itco 9C08-43 MOWING RECORD • Customer Nacre Address �`/l R c .�C/. 5^2 fir*UJ ki/ -c ,.C.I.ty State yip Legal Description (where work is performed) *Parcel 4 7fr/n 3,, d 06 6. 3 Describe in detail area mowed Visible evidence of prior treatment (describe - include t damaged vegetation due o mowing or spraying) �- Q�Ip? ✓��/1.1iYr-.4 i Target weed: (circle) Canada thistle lea spurge fY field bindweed Russian knapweed cmusciethistilj whitetop Mowing: Date Class Time started Time ended Total (excluding Acres downtime & absences mowed 7-1:99,e /rte, o g /a'per/ �- Total mowing time 'yam * approximate number of acres in this parcel !7/4"../.-= /-<_...) t Approximate number of acres or sq. ft. mowed _"/dt-a4acses/ sq. ft. Expected completion date Comments: x08.39 78-- � Signature of Pest inspector or Asst. Signature of Contra or *To be completed by Inspector VELD Cyr CCU ' C: -S h1 0: 59 CL` BOARD OF THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS E WELD COUNTY COLORADO TO `1.:_ � _ • PO BOX 758 GREELEY, CO 80632 August 31st, 1990 Gentlemen: On August 31st, 1990 I appeared at the office o£ the Weld County Commissioners in order to inspect the documents I had requested for my hearing in my letter to you dated August 23rd, 1990. I was disappointed not to find most of the documents I was looking for in spite of a diligent effort by the two ladies in your office. Due to this fact I requested a continuance of my hearing for the 12th of September. 1990 and Mr.Bruce Barker assured me that there would be no problem for such a continuance. Again I would like to request or subpoena the originals of the following documents to be available for my inspection a reasonable amount of time prior to the hearing as well as their presence at the time of the hearing: 1 . The 1961 petition to establish the Johnstown Pest Control District along with all signatories. 2. The ballots voting for or against the establishment of the Johnstown Pest Control District. 3. The verification of such a petition and that 66 2/3Z of affected Land Owners voted for the establishment of the District. 4. Most recent Competitive bids from all contractors. 5. The last annual report by the pest control inspector to the board. 6. The inspectors official notice served on me as land owner. hank you, iko c le 680 WCR 3 ' Berthoud. CO 0513 ". - 4939 -rr�� ,.: a , L 4 C.S uo.ti" _ -7?y \-4)N - 1 - f e, .t.c'l .✓ RESOLUTION RE: ACTION OF THE BOARD CONCERNING PETITION FOR LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ALONG BASSWOOD AVENUE WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs o£ Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, a Petition for a :Local Improvement District was submitted by owners of property in the area of East 19th Street Road between Balsam Avenue and Basswood Avenue, and Basswood Avenue between East 19th Street Road and East 20th Street, said area being more particularly described in said Petition, and I WHEREAS, after review, the Board deems it advisable to accept said Petition and schedule a Preliminary Hearing concerning this matter for October 3, 1990, at 10:00 a.m. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that a Preliminary Hearing to consider the aforementioned Petition for a Local Improvement District on the hereinabove described roads be, and hereby is, scheduled for October 3, 1990, at 10:00 a.m. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 12th day of September, A.D. , /11990. i /� /J BO O COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: O424 l✓ 44.L., �n WEL LINTY, CO ORADO Weld County Clerk to the Board ene R. Brantne , Chairman Y: eorge Kennedy, Pro-T m / uty C er to t e Boar n� APPROVED AS T FORM: onstance L. HarSee-C er i t � C.W. K _ , C my Attorn G ac 900822 sLCXX3i au eft;, , EAr, P RESOLUTION RE: GRANT REQUEST OF ROGGEN FEEDLOT/RICHARD HESSEE TO PREADVERTISE AMENDED SPECIAL USE PERMIT WHEREAS, the Board o£ County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, Tom Cope, representing Roggen Feedlot/Richard Hessee, has submitted a letter to the Board requesting that the Amended Special Use Permit application be preadvertised, and WHEREAS, a copy of said letter of request is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and WHEREAS, after review, the Board deems it appropriate to grant said request to preadvertise this matter. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the request of Tom Cope, representing Roggen Feedlot/Richard Hessee, to preadvertise the Amended Special Use Permit application be, and hereby is, granted. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that the hearing date to consider said Special Review Permit application be set for October 10, 1990, at 10:00 A.M. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 12th day of September, A.D. , 1990. ATTEST: ildth� BO OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WEL UNTY, C O Weld County Clerk to the Board fi ne R. Brantner, C airman i �s rjZc.r ct_e , /7".1-211,--74 A-) orge x nnedy" , Pro- em Deputy Clerk to • e Board v- APPROVED AS TO FORM: Constannee L. ar ert C.W. 4e� 5rTri.c314sef.e-r-- f County Attorney 900840 Pt074 9 ee lkow: P%)2`'1-'` RESOLUTION RE: GRANT MOBILE HOME PERMIT NO. 1679 - MARTINEZ WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, on the 12th day o£ September, 1990, considered the request of Vincente for a mobile home to be used as a principal dwelling, and WHEREAS, said mobile home is to be occupied in an A-Agricultural Zone District on a parcel of land being more particularly described as follows: Lot 6, Block 66, Aristocrat Ranchettes Subdivision, Weld County, Colorado WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners, having heard the testimony, finds that said request should be granted subject to the following conditions: 1) The applicant obtaining a building permit for the mobile home prior to locating the mobile home on the property; 2) A septic permit shall be obtained from the Weld County Health Department prior to the issuance of a building permit; 3) Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the owner shall submit evidence that Aristocrat Ranchettes Water Project is supplying water in such a manner as to be adequate in quality, quantity and dependability for the proposed use; and 4) The mobile home shall not be located on the property until such time that the building permit has been ussued and Conditions 1, 2, and 3 have been complied with. • NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by -he Board of County Commissioners of weld County, Colorado, that the request of Vincente Martinez for permission to place a mobile home to be used as a principal dwelling on the above described parcel of land, which was found to be in compliance with Section 43 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, be, and hereby is, granted subject to the hereinabove listed conditions. 900832 P6.o&a8 cc : P "mom.-,'Lnai Page 2 RE: ZPMH #1679 - MARTINEZ The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 12th day of September, A.D. , 199�0�.1 I i�/�'/lin BO OF COUNTY, C COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: (,�C/I //(/ WE COUNTY, C RADO Weld County Clerk to the Board Gene R. Eircn er, Chairman / /j77ntiof L« e ge n� cQ/ G nne� Deputy Clerk t the Board ��,, �� 4-12.44..free.CJ APPR VED AS TO FORM: Constance L. Bar rt C y County Attorney Gor 900832 MOBILE HOME ZONING PERMIT ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW Date: September 12, 1990 ✓ ZPMH: ZPMH-1679 Applicant: Vincente Martinez This request is for one mobile home to be used as principal dwelling. Legal Description of Parcel: Lot 6, Block 66, Aristocrat Ranchettes Subdivision, Weld County, Colorado The Department of Planning Services' staff has reviewed this request and approves this request for the following reasons: WILL WILL NOT X Be compatible with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. X Be compatible with the surrounding area. X Be in harmony with the character of the neighborhood. X Adversely affect the immediate area. X Be adequately served by water and sewage disposal facilities. X Adversely affect the general health, safety, and welfare of the inhabitants of the area and the County. The Department of Planning Services' staff recommendation for approval is conditional upon the following: 1. The applicant obtaining a building permit for the mobile home prior to locating the mobile home on the property. 2. A septic permit shall be obtained from the Weld County Health Department prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the owner shall submit evidence that Aristocrat Ranchettes Water Project is supplying water in such a manner as to be adequate in quality, quantity, and dependability for the proposed use. 990832 ZPMH-1679 Vincent. Martinez Page 2 4. The mobile home shall not be located on the property until such time that the building permit has been issued and conditions 1, 2, and 3 have been complied with. 4.11.4,i±4142:444se Current Planner gcCs n BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SIGN POSTING CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER THE PENALTIES OF PERJURY THAT THE SIGN PROVIDED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES WAS POSTED ON THE PROPERTY AT LEAST TEN (10) DAYS PRECEDING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER'S HEARING FOR CASE l6�Prt-i� - I�'(9 . THE SIGN WAS POSTED BY: /,),/ CrNrc N NAME OF PERSON POSTING GN SI NATURE OF APPLIC STATE OF COLORADO ) COUNTY OF WELD ) SUBSCR,I19? •AND, SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS 1 DAY OF 1.544\,,,x‘,,,„\s,ti , 19 OTARy ` . '31.1Gr9 : aL�k�ra. �ee,.� �le�F ro`OQQ� ; NO' ARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES_ anoth on'vim.Fa, )3, on LAST DAY TO POST SIGN IS:�_- 19 SC ti.Y..J32 .til l 2O I , _x.. '21 ) % v (' ,� ♦J- - 23 r. 1 u t --If \ �j ;22, • 23\ / • 26- S�.soo "-y ` \ 21 ]I c� , l !�� --ago-- . .11 - •„_rte '' �—.��— a „Yr v I . , ` 01.• \ '\\ -1- \ , v , N. 1 I `. ,J/gin\'•0M. • _ \ . i\ i. t • ,BM • LBBI 1 I _ .9aJ 1s'rt Sch' •• • 4911 ` \ --'--�` •` -evly. .' - ��, _ I %� , 4nao \ L — \. Oil�h (� 1 .-..,- 'J 090 -�� 4 _I � f 29 28 vsr 2 • \S 26 r. �� 1 a� s / 8 .�. ^� .L960 tl 151 r- �/I e _ _ `— -+ /i \ � a- - I� z .na 9 — — _ .9 1 .=-� -.1 �I Sr / i . � v :- / 2 , U1% ,_/ = J a . / I ,,� 11 \ ; : / 8 1.-...,\...„.c34t r. : ; 35 I r • `\• \.1 ii�'I 1S ort Lupton - ` It �1 3 1 w -r `' I• _ I app / 1 • ..y • 11 5'- it �\ '. -_ O. \ t2; 1. - \. t 1 ' - - \ Q - .930 0Winamdll, - \ I;; _ --_ ��438 2' \ ` ' I 1 -• � \ `." c`--% l • 11 seo . 7 417•3. •....R�..-..- � r _ - a .. - 1 • r. Ceilie[e71 - �; -_� - 1 p0 _-_ ( 0\ ..,.,. • W I I '" N h N . w i N �w N � N0 w ___ __cf: _ -� .�- I Y W" 1 i w • I •n I • I; M. V a� w.7 • W�r--- ,c Y \ 6=1 ` • ,, i _ i • II — • -: I • — �> (41 _ 1 N : N M1 I cc. NIw ell IN Ni • Fe Nit EH < 1 �I �,' •�• kil �' �"bl . Ia y"I . a I • • gale ♦ • II Irv0 - cue a` i - I • Ir - I • I - I • I • _ L. I N I ill M1 N I w .. I N N N w ea I± ;it i_ rat.,, � I �—J �a t Q IN I A I m A • A t• a • Isle I t n` I---I i I I I - I * l I . II, . a . a + Ia ♦ I a I . 1 • I I ii �� , vSwI% �— J F.�ll'rt-rvc n 1 N .,_ I • / N I. b N • m N . 2 II . I . I - r •y.. —�I .. . �' 1� r- -.QII--•� II ir' 1 ++-��'n n - AP •O -a��n� • n . I�IL:R N I�I J N LL " I J I A I`I 1 1 m I - I m - m - • a l l _ [-wall _ I • �� nI� I _ I • I - II^ m IN ! N I�IM1Iroltdr- I , NiI~ N w11NIa- 1 01 10 I N 1 N N Ir� 1 N h . I A V 1 I n I V • I " Q m I O l • I P ! N 1 A I• RI I L-�_—, 'Th. {e. I I n 11 1 \lIr - V 1 I A ''' 10 _ � Kl�j� 14. 1 N l . �I n I • " I 1 • I ♦ N- re In I I . YI /t/ I N �� 1 III" I �� I ; _ I • 1 • m 0 � �.�.� Im --/II II • I I� • II F r* 1 - *-� - � I N Ire I� �N N IAN p�IN ��I ( N II M1 I h� X. II r. IN I. I I N VI, FN SIN I I ., N a A�m I ! A f 101 A u Aim I n�w 1�` -I I .. . I it ''� I I i� I ! I.I it I A �in m a n I��1D III I----. m 4I 11 m �• ( " 1 1 " 11 " I " I A�NdN I Le I N I I e a ea llinulu I,la .I. I _ _ _ , V� I _ nm I - ' • I m • I • I , • I _..I m Ise A N�h I NISI N M1 I N N Hirai , N M1 C '~ !!--II�III II r � lTA4 N a w N II h I E�I I h N It , I - I I�- 1� ry N _ll n m I• I e"I n m I I A m n • n Iv A w n m A m o A Ii 10 IIA !Iv, '-.-j-! >-- I- 7 I -�`yil _H ` W' I I . m •I • I " I1 . I . I . a Ii v I " I I n N . ' a •� . a 15 H If __�_ � u�� `. ...� �_ JAW ; I I I I I co - �- r' 1 ( I Im II Imll Im � I • _ o1I _ I . 1 ^ • I �_ K��i_.. ,---11--I I� �• I N I M1 ( N I- f N I N ! I N NI N w N I I. I N I.r.r�- f ~ -Y--1 f. ' I A I • j A 1'I/m �. I W A • I , n V ;fir .I I " 7• an I . 11 .. II`I I A II. IIn I " '� , Ja I < I . I n . I a v I a . I a . a v n I • �" .• I " II,�J2j , .. 1N • �cc 1 I l , I JL ( 5 Tom — I I cc '7171 I— 1• ! .� I 1 •I I i Iv ! - • • , F. N l h ry 'IN N ., N N I, IN h NII—nn N N I A i a . N •y A I NHHM1 M1— N 1. Q I _ . , 1 _� I NO—. a n I - In Il -m I I A I—rII m I A 10 I A II m I ^ • I A I n 1 A I n-�,l . 5 . is I l v IIn I v I n v I`N-1;. a I ^I . n • •'�t ii �J A .JI . � ,I�( I� ( g ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW FLOW SHEET CASE It e>r01.4 Its 9 APPLICANT: V '4c�r.+-r REQUEST: TnDti e MDNY` -7-1aNistchr{ s} 1 -Ir� sooty A rF-4 PA Leste)-1,41\/61 LEGAL: Lb•rdo /ice Ap:4-h1r*t_A-r- irs44GNIrstTa/4 LOCATION: b"ten+ At.).7 Ara ee r,/--iQ rF— I61 FprOXirAtc4 v I-1 +arIA&r r�1-4.)Fr:NI r1 Date By Application received q/. •-•d r• i Application complete 'ep f yc:2O I ASA�� Letter to applicant drafted 1/ 4/go A5AK:i l Referrals listed 45/4/ SID I p=Are- File assembled 4-B • etc. Letter to applicant mailed 4-4-4,:n 1ti y Ref errals mailed 8-4 -4,c.• 1 ChaindeYed e- 7-97) DP recommendation drafted 6•, L•J�( Administrative Review decision: History card completed • COMMISSIONERS' HEARING DATE: Date By Air photo and maps prepared Field check by DPS staff CC Action: CC resolution received History card completed Recorded on maps and/or filed • Spo's \tut> °� - 8- 90 n SC0332 WELD COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES ZONING PERMIT 915 10th Street MOBILE HOME ' Greeley, Colorado 80631 Phone 356-4000 Ext. 4400 IMPORTANT - Complete all items on both sides. Mark boxes where applicable. APPLICANT • PHONE t/Zn/ GE/v� �. Ir7A2 z- z E Ds) P'S1-209/ ADDRESS , _ , /{ 310 ed,40, /-{zwy_s-2 raft r z. LV Ce. A04 OWNER .✓. N PHONE C eh/i c lz. inAT / e Z _ rl rge_g e5-6 -2 9 0 / ADDRESS / g /-41'W N./5- Eo �� cs lGfv Co , ta52 / CITY -• STATE - ;_LE^ L- 4 o / GIN l'O , oP662 1 LOT I la ....IQ?{SPzcC-RA-17-4Naf/t/;$ LEGAL DESCRIPTION E.Js/ W .�y Section , T N, R. 44 W. Total Acreage Application for zoning permit is made for: Staff Approval Board of County Commissioners Approval Temporary Use During Construction O Use Beyond 18 months During Construction of a residence"' of a residence ❑ Temporary Storage - p Extension Beyond 6 months for Temporary Storage Accessory to Farm D More than one MH as Accessory to Farm Accessory Use as an Office El More than one MH as Accessory Use as El Accessory Use in C or I Zone District an Office Accessory Structure O More than one MH as Accessory Use in • C or I Zone District �... _.._ _ - 0 Temporary Use during_Medical Hardship_,v 0. More than one accessory structure Principal Dwelling The above requires an Application fee of The above requires- an Application fee of 5100.00 5150.00 TYPE OF.SEWAGE DISPOSAL _. TYPE OF-WATER SUPPLY "' C_�t� Q Public_.or .private company:_. ® Public-or-private-company. g _ . A.`R:W eR,a"" r I c rn Septic Tank - Permit #6904/5!v O Individual_(well,- cistern) I . Well Permit p ! w _ -- Copy Attached: Yes 12+ - No Copy Attached: Yes G[ No CI a DEPARTMENT OFPLANNING SERVICES USE ONLY ZONINGaDISTRICT �_ ... cZONYNG,3ER.'•LIT.zuzzER- r� �Q APPLICATION FEE PAI RECEIPT NU7/3 R DATE 7 1 SS APPROVED BY. O Staff O Board of County Commissioners Hearing Date 1SSISED BY: DATE MOBILE HOME BUILDING PERMIT NUMBER DATE ISSUED.-"C.35.L4 A sketch plan is reyuired_as_part_ofthe :applicatipn_review._klease_attach asketch_p1An _. _. .,_ of the site at the scale on one inch represents fifty feet or other sortable scale to show the proposed. location of the mobile home, in_eluding-distances__frem_the_proper.tY_lines_and,_.: other-Structures on the property; access to the mobile home, indicating whether the access' is existing or proposed; location and measurements of any easements .or right-of-waysk_and„_ any'existing atructu're's' on the property. _.. . Ske[ch-Plan'attached: Yes1 `No Q Deed or contract attached. Yea ® No Wh t housing is available on the property and what.is its present use? 0 . -11;16 a2 a t irr `ter/A(I` AIL) im?P o r in c N l ." . How many mobil homes are on this property at the present time? it/'OWE TEMPORARY USE DURING CONSTRUCTION OF A RESIDENCE Bui ermit Number Date Building Permit Issued Zoning Permit va s months from date of issue. Zoning Permit issued to �`� - - __. RENEWALS: ` FIRST - From to Fee: Reviewed 5 Appr eov Z � SECOND -From--Fromm f�J to _ Fee: Reviewed S Approved_" ACCESSORY FkU -GSE__ - Type of farming operation on property-s`==.___ Number of Livestock Average number }C ar �__..__ _.. . . - � Acres Irrigated Acres_asyl*,,A Acres Pastur Numnlyeea now-employed-_..- __ l;k tzme Part Tlm6: ACCESSORY-USE IN C OR I ZONE DISTRICT - Type of commercial or fila 'vit on property: _ Number o£ eesr-7-- -f Full time -- Part ;Mobile-home'will•he used for: War:, 'V _IAPPL CATION_D _ _ BUILDING-PERMITS-ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL MOBILE HOMES IN ADDITION TO THE ZONING:PERMIT FOR MOBILE HOMES. THE B ;LDING PERMIT MAY BE OBTAINED-FROM THE BUILDING INSPECTION DIVISION, ...ROO1�L'342 :3�.CENTER.,.-.915 -10th•-STREET,-GREELEY-i-COLORADO-806-31-;--PHONE-356-4000 EXT. 4425, AFTER APPROVAL OF THE ZONING PERMIT. FIELD CHECK FILING NUMBER: ZPMB-1679 DATE OF INSPECTION: August 8, 1990 NAME: Vicente Martinez REQUEST: Mobile Home Zoning Permit for a principal dwelling LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 6, Block 66, Aristocrat Ranchettes Subdivision, Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: North and adjacent to Weld County Road 16, approximately 2 miles east of Fort Lupton LAND USE: N Residential E Residential S Dryland W Residential ZONING: N Agricultural E Agricultural S Agricultural W Agricultural COMMENTS: There are no improvements on the property. There Is no existing access. The subject property slopes gently to the north. The available access would be onto Weld County Road 16. By: Br an A. Grubb Current Planner st G`_' 32 WELD COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES 915 TENTH STREET GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 SIR: REASON FOR APPLYING FOR A ZONING PERMIT FOR A MOBILE HOME ON LOT 6 BLOCK 66 ARISTOCRAT RANCF.ETTES INC. SUBDIVISION OF WELD COUNTY ALSO KNOWN BY STREET AND NUMBER AS 15123 WCR 16, FORT LUPTON, COLORADO 80621 . IS TO IMPROVE THE VACANT LAND, A POSSIBLE SALE AND A PERMANENT DWELLING. VICENTE G.MMARTINEZ v 15236 COLO. HIWA 52 FORT LUPTON COL RADO 80621 (303) 857-2091 SC0832 s � '3 � < r k E 1 i , t i ;o `,1 ; n$ '• e r,1) a1 '• a 7,r a• • C.... 'LA) Lr e c� . c .A /80 ' t H rs 1 er- ` r r ' r _. _.._ _ _ .h//?r /d_PriZ e e i � � Z .I� v('ncin .. L F'!};i IO6 INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM NO. G—`)001561 n.;! Al::'I"'i...:i:;"11..i. I,.yINI 1..01 A!... WELD t"OUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT NEW APPLICATION CAT`ON! ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES 1 51 7 16TH AVENUE COURT, GREELEY, CO 8067,1 liV:'rai MARTINEZ, e .L,..L..N.1",,'... t1A;DRE: ;S 15236 rIWY .>.:. PH •,,:r0."•i 857-2091 ' 1='ORT i_Lf!=TON CO 80621 ADDRESS OF PROPOSED SYSTEM 151 23 Ht.f'i 1 £1 FORT LUPTON CO80621 bb 6, ul4• :?6 7WI I(Nt:,LEGAL DESCRIPTION OE ,.: .I. 1I:.. S ac:C S'IJJ:U?.!.d.L SL(.hV : ARISTOCRAT I:AU '1-II:'T'Y i_a' LOT f.., I:I_C71:1{ 66 FILING G USE TYPE : RESIDLNIIAL MOBILE HOME ;.ii._RV C E . PERSONS 4 BATHROOMS HROOM,S 1 .00 LOT SIZE 1 . 00 ACRES BEDROOMS .. BAgEMENT PLUMBING NO WATER SUPPLY A ,.;,S'7 APPLICANT ACKNOWLEDGES THAT THE COMPLETENESS OF THIS APPLICATION IS CONDITIONAL UPON FURTHER MANDATORY AND ADDITIONAL ION61L TESTS AND REPORTS As MAY _Q PE REQUIRED BY THE WELD ril:,, COUNTY HEALTH 1-; DEPARTMENT TO BE h?r-IiJ,_ AI\1) FURNISHED SI-II_D :CrY ! K.. i^iF'!"I_i:CA\!'i OR BY THE • WELD C HEALTH"_ FOR PURPOSES RP C_S OE -' EVALUATION r I_ APPLICATION; I WI::.1...., 1..;01.,\TY .iL:.Fi... I I-. DEPARTMENT � .��, � l.lr,. CJ..I',., OE THE ...VALJA17:.0N 0� THE AE'r'i_.:.CA .,C1N i i AND THE i..., lA:.)..11-.I....:.:. OF THE I::. PERMIT IS SUDjECT TO :11-i„I-, TERMS AND CONDITIONS A,1 DEEMED i_U NE"L;!::.S'SAI•:1' TO 7:Ni(.1:,;::. CO:uPL...LANiCI:_ w.L , : I Fil,!L.F.::S AND lft(:.UI.PIT':f.ONS ADOPTED UNDER ARTICLE 10, 'I"J: 1"i..E 25, f.;RS 19"73, AS AMENDED. THE APPLICANT CERTIFIES THAT THE PROPOSED .EM , . I,.... .... ATE .... SYSTEM c::.11 W,.L..I.. NOT krt:. LOCATED�..D WITHIN!-!:I:N 400 cc-�,m f' - COMMUNITY ry o•r i��. Ji• A l..Cl!I,IiJNl; , SEWAGE 11G,:_ SYSTEM, 7iiE UNDERSIGNED GNEiD HEREBY CERTIFIES THAT ALL. STATEMENTS MADE, INFORMATIONAND REPORTS SUBMITTED HEREWITHr AND REQUIRED fRED '"O D SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT ARE, OR WILL I F, REPRESENTED T B TRUE AND (',{JI''RECT TO THE PEET OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND 'i3f-iI:r, AND ARE DESIGNED TO BE RELIED O;\ BY THE WE,.I: COUNTY ,fc_A..71-I DEPARTMENT IN EVALUATING T'i•I,=: SAME FOR PURPOSES 0f= '.SSi.i.?Nl:r THE PERMIT APPLIED 1=0R HEREIN. I 1=iJRTiil-li iiNDE.: STAND THAT FALSIFICATION CR MISREPRESENTATION MAY RESULT IN THE DENIAL OF THE APPLICATION (11r( REVOCATION OF r1N`( P:_nMJ.T GiiAN : !r..0 r;AScD U!='(:!N SAID !^If-'P'!_.:i:!:A'':i.ON AND N L.t:.l:,!-1L ALI .LUi•i FOR I'f_R,!i.IfiY AS F'!;:O+JCril' + BY l.Plkl. APPLICATION FEE 5 150. 00 V i wl N I I G. i1i i' R r I IN DATE 07/27/90'/9 0 uWNER/AGENT SIGN JURE ---- DATE I ORIGINAL--APPLICANT; COPY--WCHD WCHD—EHS MAY, 1924 i Date nc-17,/99?) ARISTOCRAT RAhCIETTES WATER PROJECT Inc. 15841 Dale Ave. Ft. Lupton, Colorado 80621 Greetings; This is to confirm that there is a working water tap on BLOCK 4 6; LOT If you have any questions, please call the bookkeeper at 857-4210. 7 w1 > Thank you, OPEIOU #5 . 272/7,-)3111-4-1‘6 SJT 7-87 • • ReCorded at o'clock_M., Reception No, _ Recorder. WARRANTY DEED I ' THLS DEED, Made this 31st day of July .19 90 , I between Kathleen S. Brown, also known as Kathleen S. Banos, II now know as Kathleen T. Schell I I 3134 R. Vinster, Tucson, Arizona 85716 oftht[dI�d • 'I • County of ,State of Cif.Mi,grantor(s)and 1 ArizonaII Vicente G. Martinez ' whoa legal address 9 7 is 15236 Rf hwa 52 I I Fort Lupton, CO 8062'1 ! I ,I I I of the County of Veld .State of Colorado,grantee(s): I I I! I WITNFSSETH,That the grantor(s),for and in consideration of the sum of($10,000) Tea Thousand and NO/100 DOLLARS. ! the receipt and suffciencyofwhich is hereby acknowledged.ha S granted,bargained,sold and conveyed,and by these present.%do OS grant, ii bargain.sell,convey,and confirm,unto the grantce(s), his heirs and assigns forever,enlist real property,together with improvements, if any,situate.hying and being in the County of Vold ,State of Colorado, described as follows: ItI! II li Lot 6 in Block 66, II 1pL Aristocrat Ranchettes, Second Filing, li a subdivision of Veld County fee' 31;00 I �i I also known by street and number as: 15123 VCR 16, Fort Lupton, CO 80621 TOGETHER with all and singular the heredimmentc and appurtenances thereto belonging,or in anywise appertaining,and the reversion and I Ireversions,remainder and mmainders,rents, issues and profits thereof,and all the estate,right.title,interest,claim and demand whatsoever of the I grantor(s).either in law or equity,of,in and to the above bargained premises,with the hereditament and appurtenances, TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises above bargained and described with the appuncnarces,unto the grantee(s), his heirs and i 1 assigns forever.And the grantor(O.for her scl f , her heirs and personal representatives,do e5 covenant,grant,bargain,and agree to and with the granice(s), his heirs and assigns,that at the lime Mho enstaling and delivery of these presents, She i5 well I! I' seized of the premises above conveyed,ha 5 good.sure.perfect,absolute and indefeasible estate of inheritance,in law, in fee simple, and I ha S good right,full power and authority to grant,bargain,sell and convey the same in manner and form as aforesaid,and that We same arc free I' I and clear from all former and other grants,bargains,sales,liens,talcs,assessments.encumbrances,and restrictions of whatever kind or nature socvcr. except 1990 and subsequent ad valorem taxes which the grantee agrees to assume and pay when due. I I I'i 1I The grantor(s)shall and will WARRANT AND FOREVER DEFEND the above-bargained premises in the quiet and peaceable possession of the !I I grantee(s), his his heirs and assigns,against all andevory person or persons lawfully claiming the whole or any part thereof. Ii, I IN WITNESS WHEREOF,Ow grantor(s)ha executed tti s on the date set forth above. II I �� / I I �0. �I I I Ka h on S Brow II I a o�oe�a�. (lanes f� /� D I i I n a at eon 1=Schell i I I STATE OF€44bnarcAtle AR1ztNh I Ss. I County of PIMA ) II, The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this f Sr day of iquq 5t ,19/O Q , I by Kathleen S. Brow, a/k/a Kathleen S. Banes, o/k/a Kathleen T. Schell F I I My commission expires Witness my hand and official fA� seal. • 'I' 'av Commission Expires May 24. 1976 1 �J //''��-m17�{�lLr, • 11 //�JJ I I I (` I 'If in Denver,insert"City and", >_ CIrJ W 7 ri I No.932,Rev,3-iiS, WARRANTY DEED(roe r'hmoarsphlc Won) Bradford Publishing.5x:5 w',Oh Are.,Lektwoal,CO x0$11—(.rat)271•(900 axe 1 io, • REFERRAL LIST NAME: Vincent Martini'? CASE WINKER: a/MR-1679 REFERRALS SENT: August 8, 1990 REFERRALS TO BE RECEIVED BY: August 22, 1990 ODtNTy TOWNS and CITIES ----Attorney Ault -7-Health Department Brighton Extension Service ----1acono Thergency Mmagement Office ---"Eaton Sheriff's Office Erie —mil gineer ng 'vans ' Mousing Authority Firestone , Airport Authority —Fort Lupton ----binding Inspection -Frederick Garden City STATE Gilcrest "-`$ivision of Water Resources Greeley Geological Survey Grover Department of Health Hudson "Highway Department Johnstown ----Historical Society -Jteenesbiag Water Conservation Board Bersey ----Oil and Gas Conservation Ccaaission Salle FIRE DISTRICTS Lcmgmvnt Ault F-1 Mead Berthoud F-2 Milliken Brighton—bamno F-19 3 r Mu Eaton F-4 -Platteville Fort Lupton F-5 Severance _Galeton F-6 Windsor - Hudson F-7 Johnstown F-8 COUNTIES ta Salle F-9 Adams The: . .t t F-10 Boulder —1,111 .‘,1 F-11 Gezdmer Nunn F-12 Pawnee Platteville F-13 FEDERAL owno ENT AGENCIES Platte Valley F-14 US Army Corps of Engineers Poudre Valley F-15 — SDP,-APHIS Veterinary Service — kaysaer —Federal Aviation Administration Southeast Weld F-16 -federal Comanication Cession 'Windsor/Severance F-17 -Wiggins F-18 Western Hills F-20 SOIL CONSERVATION DISTRICTS Brighton OTHER _Fort Collins Central Colo. Water Conservancy Dist. Greeley 'Panhandle Planning Commission Adams SC0332 CarrIIS.SION/ Maw &*("C‘41181, DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE t303)3564000,EXT.4400 91510th STREET t i GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 • COLORADO August 8, 1990 Vincent Martinez 15:36 Iiittway 52 Fort Lupton, CO 80621 Subject: ZF R-1679 - Request for a zoning permit for a mobile home to be used as a principal dwelling on a parcel of land described as Lot 6, Block 60, Aristocrat Ranchette, Weld County, Colorado. Aar Mr. Martinez: I have scheMil.ed a meeting with the Board of County O mni csioners on Wednesday, September 12, 1990, at 9:00 a.m. to consider your application. This meeting will take place in the County Commissioners' Bearing Roam, first floor, Weld Canty Centennial Center, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado. It is recommended that you or a representative be in attendance to answer any grestions the Board of County Commissioners might have with respect to your application. It is the responsibility of an applicamt to see that a sign is posted on the property under consideration at least 10 days preceding the hearing date. Sometime prior to August 31, 1990, you or a representative should call me to obtain a sign to be posted on the site no later than September 3, 1990. The Department of Planning Services' staff will make a recommendation concerning this application to the Board of Comity Commissioners. It is the responsibility of the applicant to call the Department of Planning Services' office a few days before the date of the Commissioners' hearing to obtain the recommendation. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to call re. Respectfully/ f�� Sig, Brian A. Grubb Current Planner SCQCrl32, CERTIFICATE OF MAILING I hereby certify that I have placed a true and correct copy of the surrounding property owners and owners and lessees o£ minerals in accordance with the notification requirements of Weld County in Case Number ZENH-1679 for Vincente Martinez in the united States Mail., postage prepaid First Class Mail by postal card as addressed on the attached list. this 9th day of August, 1990. T0: SURROUNDING PROPERTY CWNERS The Weld County Board of County Caardssiaoers will hold a public hearing cn Wednesday September 12, 1990, at 9:00 a.m. in the County Cc®issioners' Hearing Room, first floor, Weld County Centennial CenrPr, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado, concerning the request of: CASE NUMBER: Zaki-1679 APPLICANT: Vinoente Martinez REQUEST: Mobile Home Zoning Permit for a principal dwelling LEGAL: Lot 6, Block 66, Aristocrat Ranchettes Subdivision, Weld County, Colorado appxmcimately LOCATION: North and adjacent to Weld Canty Road 16, 2 miles east of Fort Lupton For more information call Brims A. Grubb, Current Planner. VELD COUNTY DEENME : OF PLANNING SERVICES 915 10th Street - Ream 342 Greeley, CO 80631 Phone 356-4000, Ext. 4400 SC4322 MAILING LIST Vaii-1679 Vincente Martinez Clark B. Swank 7022 Weld County Road 31 Fort Lupton, CO 80621 L. Glidden 1 074 Good Avenue Fort Lupton, CO 80621 Opal E. Miller 15163 Barley Avenue Fort Lupton, CO 80621 Heirs of Andrew D. Cole 15213 Barley Avenue Fort Lupton, CO 80621 Lean A. and Sally C. Finley 7075 Harold Street Fort Lupton, CO 80621 Eddie and Betty Frank 3060 East Bridge Street, ;327 Brighton, CO 80601 Marvin R. Hanes Y.O. Box 533 Fort Lupton, CO 80621 Leon and Beverly Maiming 15025 Good Avenue Fort Lupton, CO 80621 James W. and Anice E. Hoffhines 4565 South Clarkson Street Englewood, CO 80110 James, Jr., and Sandra Barclay Pearl McColly 15076 Coleman Avenue Fort Lupton, CO 80621 Virginia K. Smith 15253 Barley Avenue Fort Lupton, CO S0621 2C0932, MAILING LIST ZRIH-1679 Vincente Martinez Page 2 Public Service Co. of Colorado Attn: Dan Crow 5909 East 38th Avenue Denver, CO 80502 Rennoc Corporation 23203 East 152nd Avenue Brighton, CO 80601 Virgil and Goldie Lyons 7115 Harold Street Fort Lupton, CO 80621 Gerald A. Hansen 15165 Good Avenue Fort Lupton, CO 80621 Secretary of Housing and Urban Development 1405 Curtis Street Denver, CO 80202 2C0332 AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS SURFACE ESTATE Application No. Subject Property /_$"/:7_? L✓, (', le. /4 ;7;!L L �'Qp 4 6% . ." 6 G ^ l L . '6 13/., c /000 ,/cc �N� Fi1,, 9 . STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. COUNTY OF WELD ) THE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn, states that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names. addresses and the corresponding Parcel Identification Number assigned by the Weld County Assessor of the owners of property (the surface estate) within five hundred (500) feet o£ the property subject to the application. This list was compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor, or an ownership update from a title or abstract company or attorney, derived from such records, or from the records of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. The list compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor shall have been assembled“wd,thin thirty (30) days of the application submission date. J�004 1 'sk t•ETA PY ' 'Ct '.k tb,G C4 CltMrig instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me this inTh daJIF4l6try o� . 19�. WITNESS my hand and official seal. My Commission expires: Nay Cuw+miauew Exptrea Gob. 13, 1993 N ary Public •91,C C''3":42 NAMES OF OWNERS OF PROPERTY WITHIN 500 FEET Please print or type NAME ADDRESS, TOWN/CITY, ASSESSOR'S PARCEL STATE AND ZIP CODE IDENTIFICATION 0 CLARK BRADLEY SWANK FORT LUPTON,CO 80621 7022 W.C.R 31 1309-27-3-17-001 15074 GOOD AVE. RD 31 gnus L ONA GLIDDEN FORT LUPTON CO. 80621 1309-27-3-17-002 OPAL ELAINE MILLER 15163 BARLEY AVc;. FORT LUPTON,CO. 80621 1309-27-3-17-009 ANDREW DAVID HEIRS 15213 BARLEY AVE. cOr,7 FORT LULTON.CO. 80621 1309-27-3-17-008 LEON A.& SALLY C. 7075 HAROLD ST • arur,Fv FORT LUTTON.CO 80621 1309-27-3-17-005 ED➢IE & BETTY FRANK 3060 E.BRIDGE ST. 1{327 BRIUTON CO.80601 1309-27-3-17-006 MARVIN R.HANES P.O.BOX 533 LEON & BEVERLY FQgT�LTANA�0. 80621 1309-27-3-17-007 MANNING FORT LGOUPPTON CO. 80621 1309-27-3-16-011 JAMES W.& ANISE E. 4565 SU.CLARK6uA 6T. HOFFHINES ENGLEWOOD CO. 80110 1309-27-3-16-002 JAMES JR.& SANDRA 15076 COLLMA,-AVE. BARCLAY & PEARL MCCOLLY FORT LUPTON C0.80621 1309-27-3-16-009 SAME SAME 1309-27-3-16-008 SAME SAME 1309-27-3-16-003 VIRGINIA KATHERINE 1525j BARLEY AVE. SMITH FORT LUPTON,C0.80621 1309-27-3-18-001 SANE SAME 1309-27-3-18-002 PUBLIC SERVICE CO. OF COLORADO TAX COMM,. 1309-34-0-00-010 RENNOC CORPORATION 23203 E.152 AVE BRIGHTON, CO. 80601 1309-34-0-00-007 VIRGIL & GOLDIE 7115 HAROLD ST. r.vONS FORT LUPTON,C0.80621 1309-27-3-16-005 GERALD D HANSEN 15165 GOOD AVE. FORT LUPTON,C0.80621 1309-27-3-16-004 SECRETARY OF HOUSING 1405 CURTIS ST. & URBAN DEVFLOPMENT DENVER,CO. 80202 1309-27-3-16-007 °C0.332 WES POTTER t011 1 �7 h' AVENUE COURT „)` • GRE_ELEY, CO 30631 v. RHONE(303)358-4000,EXT.4400 915 100)STREET GREELEY,COLORADO 80831 ® RECEIVED SANITATION DIVISION • CASE NUMBER 2Pii:-1679 COLORADO AUG n on 0 August 8, 1990 WELD uJJd,1 .w �•1 Yom. �• AUG 2 1 1990 TO '4ECM IT MAY CONCERN: _ Enclosed is an application from Vincent Martinez for a g""pAaTh a mobile home to be used as a principal dwelling. The parcel of land is described as Lot 6, block 66, Aristocrat Panchettes Weld Comity, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is north and adjacent to Weld County Road 16, approximately 2 miles east o£ the City of Fort Lupton. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any couments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by".Angust7227; 1 ;, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please Call Brian A. Grubb, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not} comply with our Comprehensive flan for the following reasons. 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but ue feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of ctx town for the following reasons: 3. )Y We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Please re to the enclosed letter. Signed: (/ , g Agency: deed 4,071. `Date: 0,532 August 27, 1990 Mr. Brian A. Grubb Current Planner Weld County Department of Planning Services 915 Tenth Street Room *342 Greeley, CO 80631 SUBJECT: Case Number ZPMH-1679. Vincente Martinez Dear Mr. Grubb: I strongly oppose the request by Vincente Martinez for a Mobile Home Zoning Permit on Lot 6, Block 66, Aristocrat Ranchettes Subdivison, Weld County, Colorado. For obvious reasons, allowing this permit is to further condone the blatant deterioration of this neighborhood by both the Weld County Planning Department as a controlling agency and me as a homeowner. As I may be unable t0 attend the scheduled hearing on Wednesday, September 12, 1990, regarding this request, please understand my firm opinion on this subject. Sincerely, Xeeta;-- Elaine Miller 15163 Barley Avenue Fort Lupton, CO 80621 857-2875, Home 666-7000, extension 4218, Work cc: George Kennedy County Commissioner �,�, v(Yr;b, ? AUG 2 9 1990 ,I' +'1 mgr. Ci, RESOLUTION RE: GRANT MOBILE HOME PERMIT NO. 1680 - VINCENTE MARTINEZ WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, on the 12th day of September, 1990, considered the request of Vincente Martinez for a mobile home to be used as a principal dwelling, and WHEREAS, said mobile home is to be occupied in an A-Agricultural Zone District on a parcel of land being more particularly described as follows: Lot 8, Block 56, Aristocrat Ranchettes Subdivision, Weld County, Colorado WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners, having heard the testimony, finds that said request should be granted subject to the following conditions: 1) The applicant shall obtain a building permit for the mobile home within 30 days from the date of approval by the Board of County Commissioners; 2) Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the owner shall submit evidence that a domestic well is supplying water in such a manner as to be adequate in quality, quantity, and dependability for the proposed use. The applicant shall also submit evidence that a 1,000 gallon or larger, cistern is available on the property and can supply water for the outside uses on the lot or that another legal water source is available to supply both in-house and outside uses on the lot; 3) The domestic well on the property shall be limited to inside use only for one single family dwelling and shall not be used outside the house for any purpose; 4) The return flow from the use of the well must be through an individual wastewater disposal system of the nonevaporative type where the water is returned to the same stream system in which the well is located; and 5) The mobile home shall not be occupied until the applicant has complied with Conditions 1 , 2, 3, and 4 above. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the request of Vincente Martinez for permission to place a mobile home to be used as a principal dwelling on the above described parcel of land, which was found to be in compliance with Section 43 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, be, and hereby is, granted subject to the hereinabove listed conditions. 900831 PLO(0,2 8 cc. P, rntuv „,,s Page 2 RE: ZPMH #1680 - MARTINEZ The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 12th day of September, A.D. , 1990 BO OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST:i l/di/ � WE OUNTY, CO Weld County Clerk to the Board /(A ene R. BYantner, Chairman BY: cp/ 4;71=4;75i;;;;;40, Deputy Clerk t the Board APPROVED AS TO FORM: onnst ncce HarSS: C.W. irbl County Attorney Go L 900831 MOBILE HOME ZONING PERMIT ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW `,111/41 �v Date: September 12, 1990 ZPMH: 1680 cfi Applicant: Vincente Martinez This request is for one mobile home to be used as principal dwelling. Legal Description of Parcel: Lot 8, Block 56, Aristocrat Ranchettes Subdivision, Weld County, Colorado The Department of Planning Services' staff has reviewed this request and approves this request for the following reasons: WILL WILL NOT x Be compatible with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. X Be compatible with the surrounding area. X Be in harmony with the character of the neighborhood. X Adversely affect the immediate area. X Be adequately served by water and sewage disposal facilities. X Adversely affect the general health, safety, and welfare of the inhabitants of the area and the County. The Department of Planning Services' staff recommendation for approval is conditional upon the following: 1. The applicant obtaining a building permit for the mobile home within thirty (30) flays from the date of approval by the Board of County Commissioners 2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the owner shall submit evidence that a domestic well is supplying water in such a manner as to be adequate in quality, quantity, and dependability for the proposed uso. The applicant shall also submit evidence that a 1,000 gallon or larger, cistern is available on the property and can supply water for the outside uses on the lot or that another legal water source is available to supply both in-house and outside uses on the lot. 900831 ZPMH-1680 Vincente Martinez Page 2 3. The domestic well on the property shall be limited to inside use only for one single family dwelling and shall not be used outside the house for any purpose. 4. The return flow from the use of the well must be through an individual wastewater disposal system of the nonevaporative type where the water is returned to the same stream system in which the well is located. 5. The mobile home shall not be occupied until the applicant has complied with conditions 1, 2, 3, and 4 above. - ' a sifirrubb Current Planner Sr '3;.' BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SIGN POSTING CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER THE PENALTIES OF PERJURY THAT THE SIGN PROVIDED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES WAS POSTED ON THE PROPERTY AT LEAST TEN (10) DAYS PRECEDING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER'S HEARING FOR CASE 8 -ii rn, k 1L,%te] • THE SIGN WAS POSTED BY: 1.) iC / c G. /1-)Alzurect NAME OF PERSON POSTING SIGN SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT STATE OF COLORADO ) COUNTY OF WELD ) SUBSCRIBE•AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS 12- DAY OF 5„Q ,_,� \.. , 1747,07 fjjyU ��. • ^ 7lF 4P , N(}TART PUBLIC OFcp\° MY COMMISSION EXPIRES My Commission Expires fob 13 1043 LAST DAY TO POST SIGN IS: 19 490 0831 • S ! i C`s _ 21 � y 2� t ,1:1.,/ ' / i\ i u i 2: ; ; . . „ :, c • - --„,,..:„weed. �...1Yr-. n ' .va, . `I; (' '\ 20 / __ \ ____.:\,>. ;.� — 2 i� ' ' \°\23 L i4 ,� 1�" s-1:::! \?)::. • 0 � i o.. / wee:° _ ,� 1 r),,,.."---. _1‘._,' ,_ ' r I �y18M Iwea/ a 1 'P6Rer Sch. <9)t — a5w r i �4 0 \ \ �. 1 • • ` '-•,. OqCh I• - 11 � — _ •0 // ; - ✓ 1 r �/— 5r �� \ 26 • a • \ s29 ti�r 28 --__--- a. v ? �• 1 • _ n ''‘ 1 1I^ 1.l ,\ `\ 1 / > •4892 ♦• weft - -_ _._r..�_�996 - , wsp�. ..• __ ) Z °{ -- . . C N. ` i f / o°=I �� ) �, ) I • ! i `f� •I / v \\ N _. '. tjJ it i 0, / / \ \ v . 11 : • ••<- i 4 •M gwB°> \ "1992 w99>" - e�i •�' = •t 1• oxt Lupton �• -, , c _ •1 • �nl -I a 6° ! ' i, :I v '.� i \ I •a II 1 • `\\o I L. - —__-.vao 4 WinamaN — \ s . — �.. : 1 r J 41:: >� , ti 1 ( • i 11 . Iweee .•a • _ •Y•M I • l — I • 1 N _ r a I l r I 1 r--“ N • es •-• I N 0 N 16 h *doh N� P W j—� tippn I r I +� M I + I M . a0,1,1, 0 " ,.. •iltial: + I * It CF) � • + + + ♦ e ,N.IA e r'- r��-_---�� Y , \ 1 1 CCH e. 4 N I h N I h , N I h N I h N 0 h I QI n 0 nlr M n • w • � n I . rl • I 41 1 A . . 0 ♦ . � . e � + 1 d 1 r . I . i I H — • -. 1 1 . .4 , F a - , �I - I • _ I • I - I' II g a _, I- 1--1-"— i I « I i « I h I N h lei h N I h N I h I 1Z �. � N ..�...{ '�l ' V I e ' I n f• I I n r h�+ n I + h • I sn n ,i_i It f I 11 I , I II • rtl • e • Ir • Le iI yy�------��1a kJ n�v_G ((( r Y'11M1Y1 .. -1,- 1'FF l`- I L I- ` N I'' W N ^ N � I•Q' V {I--�-N�!�� ry I1 PI I 1 N ILJ � N " LJL.� '-'I - 1 1{i/� r O • - I W W 1 W; l - r ^1/ �I� I I (W l �� I N M1 �I M1 : N 0 N i h I 14. I Mello. 7-1 r--II P-----I' 'II I1j` 10 N 740157 ' N i' F 1 ry M1 N I - �y�~ MA Iin ! W I I�� I M I Y I A Q V I i V 1 M I o 1 • n1 n u it ,, ' to Itr .J !M�III� I �• In II I I io e e I *NZ Helot : vle "—tiL��IIJ • � 0 I �Jl I - - S ' L- - ` I - I - o o W • o I`�r�l • I' r �� _ I a I ,{III 0.6„0 N M1 I N I M1 I I N V h I I N I h -fie �_,_�I Ill 1rvIM1 m --; 1 � IN71� ! I i1 1 el ry I n I N h I I� 1 I n N r , n I W n I ° n a r I i r I '71I PT ^� I M IIr � I n le her IIn ,i r .tvi g r W • n • I • I i e l r r • it I I: II e i ,��" • I , _I. 1 x .N I • YI• 1 _ 1 W - W _ +is I - • . � 1 r 1 - _ _ _ 1 N M1 I N P N M1 I N A N M1 1 N M1 Z I 1 ry l i r_. N 7 N ~ , _iz _ iz N > N I. iu - J.� N I M1 . N + li I ' n j o 1 /1 r NV ( y V e n r N .. W I I n { + c. n 'r I n 7 n 1 _}I_-IL,. „--L-'-1 F---Ic-WI 1• 1 e I • n I . 1 n I . a • � r • m 1 I I N v • L i5 CU i• ." ..1 J �� P n.j J�r WI 1 7-7---1, � �1 � T in-. _ 1 Ir }kJ I W I --. l W I - W I I - • - • • I - • i. 1� ...Hr.-1 ( "1-1, r• Mi I N I h I N I P N I M1 I I NI N I N M1 I. I N h �I I--,- w J Al...-- � 11- - • i I-- 1 n H W I n I r ' n T r i W of r I ) n + 0,0 I n ° ec n i - IIn '..,i I n I . Ii - Ii- Y of I _ U l I IjJ ��ji� I I " ll " 1 " . r ' + a • � n ; v . 3 • a it ^ _ r 1 __ i 5 , 1 YM � ; --I I- Ir�! II _ i �. �1-� • , - l• W I 71 I - IIW V1 I - W I I L r _l �"�I ,. Ii . - + 1 - o _ • 1..�. 1--I— I I I t 11_4Vi e. 9p IN 1 � 11.. I N IN IN N • I NIn • p • , ' N e , , N h N O. 1 M1 I ,Y ry I , �' N � I /� Ir IIn fW II n j .Y I !In TW )1n1 + II n • On n1 n1'+ n Ir I - I 1�I • '^ I l I n ��1• a 440 • n + I N ssr,n f _ y,� IEt- 1 - _ �i s O . 1 1, Al n I ig\t' , . S' ii sit C. t, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW FLOW SHEET CASE 0 //s1=57" APPLICANT: ‘.f nice-!tr.. [�Ar' 1/41L REQUEST: r!O/_-t1_, NOM@ 2=PPiJqnI(*- r/p_i f .0d/� G LEGAL: 1raL1 42) g+„„ort!„ �/a LOCATION: A 'ax, MA�1l�r 4. -144A pCZ 7Zr"r. X11�-n, �r-�•�r a 9 -r _ Cory Gra;o AJvO-rAad !r-t7- �, . Date. By Application received i D ./' . Application complete . Letter to applicant drafted • +' Referrals listed ( - File assembled - Letter to applicant mailed R _o _ '.> Referrals mailed Chaindesed DPS recommendation drafted Administrative Review decision: h EFgr-G History card completed • COM:IISSIONERE' HEARING DATE: 157- 0 7.-/ /Z Date . • By Air photo and maps prepared , - 1a-qo AQ,c.J Field check by DPS staff CC Action: CC resolution received History card completed Recorded on maps and/or filed , $ Poly it • 4 - 40 DV-1 WELD COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES ZONING PERMIT s 915 10th Street MOBILE HOME Greeley, Colorado 80631 Phone 356-4000 Ext. 4400 IMPORTANT - Complete all items on both sides. Mark boxes where applicable. APPLICANT . . ,, ,� ., PHONE i/l CeiVie 4'. /nAt< /r�✓eZ Cac31,FS?-2o4/ ADDRESS 1S2 JIn NiY/y.J t4'1{ Zap aN er1. ,PdG� OWNER / _PHONE. e At✓l} ADDRESS CI:Ty - STATE -�7 P LOT LOCK UBDIVISION 'FA tri_htpioN Co, oP0412 / [B LEGAL DESCRIPTION J �.� i) Z✓`._" Section a 7 T '.1/✓ N, R oe W. Total Acreage / Application'for zoning permit is made for: Staff Approval Board o£ County Commissioners Approval --Temporary -Use During Construction _ ❑ Use Beyond I8 months During-Construction of a residence of a residence ❑ Temporary Storage ❑ Extension Beyond 6 months for Temporary Storage ❑ Accessory to Farm ❑ More than one MH as Accessory to Farm Accessory Use as an Office ❑ More than one MH as Accessory Use as Q Accessory Use in C or I Zone District an Office - ❑ More than one :Ili as Accessory Use in ❑ Accessory Structure - C--or•-I-2one--District-�_ _.... _ --- -In-Temporary-Use - ❑"'Tem p ry`_IIse during"Medical Hardship ❑ More than one accessory structure gl Principal Dwelling The above requires an Application fee of The above requires an Application fee of 5100.00 3150.00 TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL TYPE OF WATER SUPPLY C cm Public or private company: ❑ Public or private company:It w y Q I '� zi Septic Tank Permit #4 900/59 ® Individual (well, cistern) \ �,7 Well Permit #,:z96.2 7 ; w -,s Copy Attached: Yes +q-+ No Q Cony Attached: Yes M Nu�J I -- - a.... . DEPART�4?NT-•0'F"PLANNING'"SERVICES`USE"Oh`L1"-"_. "'"�`. c ZONING DISTRICT ZONING PERMIT NUMBER �1S" /'Go g ' APPLICATION- FEE-PAID RECE'I' '-N , ..... , . ____ ATE.�. . _ - ._ ._....�_ APPROVED BY: ❑ Staff [3- Board of County Commissioners Hearing Date ISSUED BY: DATE MOBILE HOME BUILDING PERMIT NUMBER DATE ISSUED eCk3S 1 FIELD CHECK FILING NUMBER: ZPMH-1680 DATE OF INSPECTION: August 8, 1990 NAME: Vicente Martinez REQUEST: Mobile Nome Zoning Permit for a principal dwelling LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 8, Block 56, Aristocrat Rancbettea Subdivision, Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Approximately 2 miles east of Fort Lupton at the northwest corner of the intersection of Good Avenue and Richard Street LAND USE: N Residential E Residential S Residential W Residential ZONING: N Agricultural E Agricultural S Agricultural W Agricultural COMMENTS: There are no improvements on the property. It appears that the septic system has been installed. Access from Good Avenue is currently being used whereas the plot plan submitted shows the proposed access to be from Richard Street. The property slopes gently to the northeast. By: �-44.1. G4--# Brian A. Grubb Current Planner tiC0 h31 AUGUST 3, 1990 WELD COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES 915 TENTH STREET GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 SIR: REASON FOR APPLYING FOR A ZONING PERMIT FOR A MOBILE HOME ON LOT 8 BLOCK 56 ARISTOCRAT RANCHETTES INC. SUBDIVISION ALSO KNOWN BY STREET AND NUMBER AS 7117 RICHARD STREET. IS TO IMPROVE THE VACANT LAND, A POSSIBLE SALE AND A PERMANENT DWELLING. WELL IS LIMITED HOUSEHOLD PURPOSES INSIDE A FAMILY DWELLING AND INSTALL A 1 , 000 GALLONS TANK TO BE FILLED WITH WATER FROM THE CITY OF FORT LUPTON FOR OUT SIDE USE ONLY. VICENTE G.MARTINEZ 15236 HIWY 52 FORT LUPTON COLORADO 80621 (303) 857-2091 SOGS3a WELD COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES ZONING PERMIT s 915 10th Street MOBILE HOME Greeley, Colorado 80631 Phone 356-4000 Ext. 4400 IMPORTANT - Complete all items on both sides. Mark boxes where applicable. APPLICANT . Vl Cl/c..GT:. Ai?•••C PHONE,_ PHONE/34 ),P.- r7- `.209, ADDRESS C " ts236 arveys r‘gI Zap f° / ea, ,Po 62 � OWNER PHONE 814 Pete ADDRESS CU; - STATE -34,1P LOT ►BLOCK UBDIVISION LEGAL DESCRIPTION 5? 1 �11 iv sr Section a 9 T 2N N, R oh, _W, Total Acreage / Application for zoning permit is made for: Staff Approval Board of County Commissioners Approval E3 Temporary -Use During Construction - ❑ Use Beyond 18 months During Construction- of a residence o£ a residence Temporary Storage ❑ Extension Beyond 6 months for Temporary Storage ❑ Accessory to Farm ❑ More than one MH as Accessory to Farm ❑ Accessory Use as an Office ❑ More than one MH as Accessory Use as ❑—Accessory Use in C or I Zone District an Office ❑ More than one :MR as Accessory Use in ❑ Accessory Structure .. . . . -.._.. - ora. Tem p ry"4se during-Medical Hardship Q More than one accessory structure Da Principal Dwelling The above requires an Application fee of The above requires an Application fee of 5100.00 5150.00 TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL TYPE OF WATER SUPPLY C v ...�• ompany Public or private company: ❑ Public or private c y i 25 Septic Tank- Permit #49pq/f�^ El Individual (well, cistern) , Well-Permit- it/. O4 22 w Cony Attached: Yes No Copy Attached: Yes 62 N — e DEPARTMENT-OF-'PLA'NNiNG`Snxvil,tS ust`ONL"Y-"'"- . "'" _ __._-_ o ZONING DISTRICT ZONING PERMIT NUMBER /660 APPLICATION--FEE--PAID-4- RECEI NG ,. . �A L//�` APPROVED BY: CC ❑ Staff ❑ Board of County Commissioners Hearing: Date ISSUED BY: DATE MOBILE HOME_BUILDING PERMIT NUMBER DATE ISSUED 1 SCv'S t . _. _ .. 4 • A sketch plan is required as part o£ the application review. Please attach a sketch plan of the., si te,_at_tbe_acale__on._.one-inch.sepresenta -fi..fty=-feet-or-other-.suitable--soap-to show the proposed location of the mobile home, including distances from the property,lines and .__other, structures_on_the-.grope.rty.;..:acces9._toLthe_zob9.1e- homerindicating wheiher--the--aceen -- is existing or proposed; location and measurements of any easements or right-of-ways; and any existing structures_on the_property_., Sketch Plan attached: Yes le No-D Deed or contract. attached: . _ Yes C._+Vo Q What housing is available on the property and what is its present use? [ilp 41.L How many_-.mobile--homes-are on this- property at the-present-time? TEMPORARY USE DURING CONSTRUCTION OF A RESIDENCE Building Permit Number Date Building Permit Issued Zoning Permit valid for 6 months from date of issue. Zoning Permit issued Valid fro to _ RENEWALS: FIRST - From to Fee: Reviewed & Approved SECOND -From to Fee: Reviewed & Approved a ACCESSORY FARM USE Type of farming operation on property: Number of Livestock Average number per year Acres Irriga�tedd Acres Dryland'— _ ___ __Acres -Pasture Number of emp oyZ ees now employed: Pull time: r Part time: 4. ACCESSORY USE IN `C OR I ZONE DISTRICT • Type of commercial or industrial activity.:on property: Number of employees: -- Full time Part time: Mobile-home= will, be„used for'� IGN URE OF ICANT APPLICATION DATE irtBUILDING,PER`'TITS ARE.REQUIRED E0 _MOBILE .HOMES -IN-.ADDITION--TO-THE ZONING-PERMIT-FOR-- _ '- MOBILE HOMES. THE BUILDING PERMIT MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE BUILDING_INSPECTION-.DIVISION, ROOM 342, CENTENNIAL CENTER, 915"10th STREET,' GREELEY COLORADO $0631, PHONE 356-4000 EXT:- 4425, AFTER-APPROVAL OF THE-20NtXNG-PERMIT.-' FIELD CHECK FILING NUMBER: ZPMH-1680 DATE OF INSPECTION: August 8, 1990 NAME: Vicente Martinez REQUEST: Mobile Home Zoning Permit for a principal dwelling LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 8, Block 56, Aristocrat Ranchettes Subdivision, Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Approximately 2 miles east of Fort Lupton at the northwest corner of the intersection of Good Avenue and Richard Street LAND USE: N Residential E Residential S Residential W Residential ZONING: N Agricultural E Agricultural S Agricultural W Agricultural COMMENTS: There are no improvements on the property. It appears that the septic system bas been installed. Access from Good Avenue is currently being used whereas the plot plan submitted shows the proposed access to be from Richard Street. The property slopes gently to the northeast. By: Brian A. Grubb Current Planner S 0331 AUGUST 3, 1990 WELD COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES 915 TENTH STREET GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 SIR: REASON FOR APPLYING FOR A ZONING PERMIT FOR A MOBILE HOME ON LOT 8 BLOCK 56 ARISTOCRAT RANCHETTES INC. SUBDIVISION ALSO KNOWN BY STREET AND NUMBER AS 7117 RICHARD STREET. IS TO IMPROVE THE VACANT LAND, A POSSIBLE SALE AND A PERMANENT DWELLING. WELL IS LIMITED HOUSEHOLD PURPOSES INSIDE A FAMILY DWELLING AND INSTALL A 1 , 000 GALLONS TANK TO BE FILLED WITH WATER FROM THE CITY OF FORT LUPTON FOR OUT SIDE USE ONLY. VICENTE G.MARTINEZ f 15236 HIWY 52 FORT LUPTON COLORADO 80621 (303) 857-2091 X6.31 Z ca 1 / tia. _ in-vti.Np . 1 LI ; r . v�/ 'wolf lapg,•ca 4/ ;CO 0 , \ --- `o j V 11` k..1 . ui V 4 1 1.s -+ . • Z V ' ws, . a, 7 _______________ r^! r; It, i•ti to , V , � Q Q A 0 . :Ca a `� `\o ,+ 4 { -4 V • -- - - --- �- � tt \_ �, v V I / • .. J HSPIO6P INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT NO. G-900137 WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT NEW PERMIT ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES 1517 16TH AVENUE COURT, GREELEY, CO 80631 353-0635 EXT.2225 OWNER MARTINEZ, VICENTE G. ADDRESS 15235 HWY 52 PH (303) 057-2091 FT. LUPTON CO $0621 ADDRESS OF PROPOSED SYSTEM 7117 RICHARD STREET FT. LUPTON CO 30631 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SITE : SEC 27 TWP 2 RNG 66 SUBDIVISION: ARISTOCRAT LOT 8 BLOCK 56 FILING 2 USE TYPE: RESIDENTIAL MOBILE HOME SERVICES: PERSONS 4 BATHROOMS 1 .00 LOT SIZE 1 .00 ACRES BEDROOMS 3 BASEMENT PLUMBING NO WATER SUPPLY FWELL APPLICATION FEE $150.00 RECD BY RECEPTIONIST AID SIGNED BY VICENTE G. MARTINEZ DATE 07/03/90 DATE 07/03/90 PERCOLATION RATE - MIN PER INCH LIMITING ZONE _47 FEET SOIL TYPE PERCENT GROUND SLOPE DIRECTION REQUIRES ENGINEER DESIGN iGCS FROM THE APPLICATION INFORMATION SUPPLIED AND THE ON-SITE SOIL PERCOLATION DATA THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM INSTALLATION SPECIFICATIONS ARE REQUIRED: 1.4i SEPTIC TANK . _ GALLONS, ABSORPTION TRENCH ��SQ. FT. OR ADSORPTION BED .4t&SQ. FT. IN ADDITION, TI- xS PERMIT IS SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOW NG ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS. rn.__. '_ ��_�_. THIS PERMIT IS GRANTED TEMPORARILY TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION TO COMMENCE. THIS PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED OR SUSPENDED BY THE WEED COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT FOR REASONS SET FORTH IN THE WELD COUNTY INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM REGULATIONS INCLUDING FAILURE TO MEET ANY TERM OR CONDITION IMPOSED THEREON DURING TEMPORARY OR FINAL APPROVAL. THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ASSUMPTION BY THE DEPARTMENT OR ITS EMPLOYEES OF LIABILITY FOR THE FAILURE OR INADEQUACY OF THE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM. M,�} a EN RONM TAL S-£CI 3.'ST-- AT THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE AND SHALL BECOME VOID IF SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION HAS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN ONE YEAR OF ITS ISSUANCE. BEFORE ISSUING FINAL APPROVAL or THIS PERMIT THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO IMPOSE ADDI- TIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS REQUIRED TO MEET OUR REGULATIONS ON A CONTINUING BA- SIS. FINAL PERMIT APPROVAL IS CONTINGENT UPON THE FINAL INSPECTION OF THE COM- PLETED SYSTEM BY THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT. 2CC 131. (1L_t_r_ar 1C`JAILr rnc_v_Lit+tary--- -- - - ---- Lrk_t11[+ oF'cow a� :act.' ROY ROMER ttiq JERIS A.DANIELSON Governor .•. State Engineer* * • /876 OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 1313 Sherman Street-Room 818 Denver, Colorado 80203 (303)866-3581 July 25, 1990 Mr.Vicente G. Martinez 15236 Hwy. 52 Ft. Lupton, CO 80621 Re: Permit No. 157627 Dear Mr. Martinez: This is in reply to your letter dated July 23, 1990, in which you ask that the acreage described in Condition of Approval No. 2 on the referenced permit be amended from 3 to 1. You state in your letter that the proposed well is to be the only well on Lot 8, Block 56 Filing 2, Aristocrat Ranchettes Subdivision, Weld County, which lot is only 1 acre in size instead of 3. You further state that you mistakenly put in 3 acres when you meant to indicate it as being only 1 acre. After considering the circumstances surrounding this mistake, we feel the permit can be amended to reflect this change. Enclosed are copies of the amended permit Please discard the copies you previously received. If you have any questions regarding this matter, feel free to contact John Bilisoly of this office. Sincerely, , LLuse. a1/4.c. Bruce E. DeBrine Water Resource Engineer Ground Water Section BED/JWB/ cc: Division 1 John's Drilling, Inc. o ^^� ��i v_i..A Form No: OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER GVP-?S COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 816 CwMwnil 111A0,1317 Gran GC,Orrnr.Coked* 60203 • t� mam 827 WELL PEFtIrQT NUMBER 157627 - _ APPLICANT DIV. 1 CNN. 62 WD 2 DES. BASIN _ MD __._ APPROVED WELL LOCATION COUNTY WELD VICENTE G MARTINEZ SE 1/4 SW 1/4 Section 27 15236 HWY 52 TwP 2 N Range 66 W S p FT LUPTON, CO 80621 DISTANCES FROM SECTION UNES • 700 Ft from $°11th Section Line 1900 Ft from West Section tine PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A WELL ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT COMMONS OF APPROVAL` 1) This well shall bo used In such a way as to cause no material injury to existing water rights. The issuance of the permit does not assure the applicant that no injury will occur to another vested water right or preclude another owner of a vested water right from seeking relief in a civil court action. i 2) Approved pursuant to CRS 37-92.602(3)(b)(II)(A) as the only well on a residential site of%acre%described as lot 8, block 56, filing Z, Aristocrat Ranchettes Subdivision, Weld County. 3) Production from this well is restricted to the Lower Arapahoe aquifer which corresponds to the interval between 50 feet and 235 feet below ground surface. Plain casing shalt be installed and sealed to prevent production from other zones. 4) The use of ground water from this well is limited to ordinary household purposes inside a single family dwelling and the watering of the users noncommercial domestic animals. The ground water shall not be used for irrigation or other purposes. 5) The return flow from the use of the well must be through an individual waste water disposal system of the non-evaporative type where the water is retumed to the same stream system in which the well is located. 6) The maximum pumping rate shall not exceed 15 GPM. 7) This well shall be constructed not more than 200 feet from the location specified on this permit. Note: To insure a maximum productive life of this well, perforated casing should be set through the entire producing interval of the approved zone or aquifer indicated above. 7/37W Pursuant to applicant's attached request dated July 23, 1990, condition of approval no. 2 above is hereby amended from an acreage of 3 acres to 1 acre. Ncas 2/25790 OWNER'S COPY ocesat ASPAIOVED: 1t- AaS • , / Receipt No. 03x436521 DATE ISSUED JUL 16 1990 IRATION OATS 1997 • ARISTOCRAT RANCHETTE WATER PROJECT, INC. P.O. BOX 172 FORT LUPTON, COLORADO 80621 -1a�e��to zrJa�z`uz�'�Cra aca IS12 gZ/ ie 0-4) gs -. AC2S/. 0082.1 AR22174S5 B 1267 REC 02217955 06/25/90 12:29 45.00 1/001 • F 1916 MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK & RECORDER WELD CO, CO i WARRANTY DEED y • • State Documentary Fee THIS DEED,Made this 22ND •• .• Dday of JUNE Date..,.�F U 1��.. $ 1990 , between DAG W. SCHLEHUBER 1 • of the .County of WELD and State of Colorado,grantor,and VINCENTE G. MARTINEZ • whose legal address is 15236 HIGHWAY 52. FORT LUPTON, COLORADO 80621 of the County of WELD and State of Colorado,grantee: WITNESSETH.That the grantor for and in consideration of the sum of SIX THOUSAND AND 00/100 ***($6.000.00)*** DOLLARS. the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged.has granted,bargained,sold and conveyed•and by these presents does grant,bargain,sell, convey and confirm,unto the grantee,his heirs and assigns forever,all the real property together with imme tments,if any.situate,lying and being in the • County of WELD and State of Colorado described as follows: LOTS 7 AND 8, BLOCK 56, ARISTROCRAT RANCHETTES. SECOND FILING, A SUBDIVISION OF WELD COUNTY I I i • ''' I I as known by street and number as: I TOGETHER with all and singular the heredltaments and appurtenances thereto belonging,or in anywise appertaining,and the reversion and i reversions,remainder and remainders,tents,issues and profits thereof•and all the estate,right.rifle.interest,claim and demand whatsoever of the , I; grantor,either in law or equity,of,in and to the above bargained premises,with the hereditaments and appurtenances. I TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises above bargained and described,with the appurtenances,unto the grantee.his heirs and assigns I forever,And the grantor,for himself,his heirs,and personal representatives,don covenant grant.bargain,and agree to and with the planet,his heirs and I: assigns.that at the time of the ensealing and delivery of these presents,he is well seized oftbe premises above conveyed,has good,sure,perfect.absolute i and indefeasible estate of inheritance,in law,in fee simple,and has good right,full power and lawful authority to grant,bargain,sell and convey the same i', in m{ manner and form as aforesaid,and that the same are free and clear from all farmer and odor gnats,bargains,sales,liens.taxes.assessments, '. encumbrances and restrictions of whatever kind or narure soever,except • I. • The grantor shall and will WARRANT AND FOREVER DEFEND the above-bargained premises in the quiet and peaceable possession of the grantee, I, his heirs and assigns,against all and every person or persons lawfully claiming the whole or any panthereof.The singular number shall include the plural, I the plural the singular.and the use of any gender shall be applicable to all genders, f 1 • IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the grantor has executed this deed on the date set f bove. I, ' /// I DAG J SCHLEHUBER " iI l; STATE OF COLORADO • l l l Cotmry of ADAMS j ss. J)) I •The forts I foreskins*lament was acknowledged before are this 22ND day a JUNE ,1590 by PAQ:14...$0* EIWBER • asT r`: hintlM�ar�&1)?'JoIVE 23 .1933 .witness my hard and official seal. �I{ •irai�rr...,. : * ri • OP c Q4 1 �Na" �c v/� ✓9 NdK ''•,•,.r.....1 ,'' 1113 10TH AVENUE GREELEY. COLORADO 80631 • *If in Denver,insert"City and". t./C,.C tiSata No.932A.Rev.7.80. WARRANTY MOP)(Nor eaarrtpaaaleIlaw4) (rte; B SIM['clenching,Irq Wane tit.,Emma,CO rw202—(501).9;3500—%.1111 e A REFERRAL LIST NAME: Vincente Martinez CASH NUMBER: ritii-1680 REFERRAIS SENT: August 8, 1990 REFERRALS ID BE RECEIVED BY: August 22, 1990 OOLIITY TCWNS and CITIES Attorney Ault —.Health Department Eton Extension Service —Dacono Emergency Management Office —'Eaton Sheriff's Office The —hgineering Evans —Housing Authority ----Firestone Airport Authority —'—Fort Lupton ----Building Inspection ----Frederick Garden City STATE Gilcrest X Division of Water Resources Greeley 'spa Geological of Health --Hudson Highway Department Johnstown ----Historical Society Eeenesburg "later Conservation Board Eersey Oil and Gas Conservation Commission La Salle —`- ochbuie FIRE DISTRICTS Magma Ault F-1 Mead Berthoud F-2 Milliken Brighton F-3 —New Raymer _ Paton F 19 ----Platteville —Fort Lupton F-5 Severance Galeton F-6 -14indsor '---HUdson F-7 - Johnstown F-8 corns ----La Salle F-9 Adams Longmont F-10 'Boulder Milliken F-I1 iariaer Nunn F-12 "`-Pawnee Platteville F-13 FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES Platte Valley F-14 US Army Corps of Engineers "`'Poudre Valley F-15 USDA-APHIS Veterinary Service --taymer —Federal Aviation Administration Southeast Weld F-16 _Federal Coaaunication Cnmission Windsor/Severance F-17 —Wiggins F-18 "-`"Western Rills F-20 SOIL CCNSFRVATTON DISTRICTS Brighton OTHER ----rortt Collins Central Colo. Water Conservancy Dist. Greeley —panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. Longmont Teri-Area Planning Commission West Adams Sees77,I CCIIIISSION/BOARD MEMBER &V; DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE(303)3564000,EXT.4100 91510th STREET 'll GREELEY,COLORADO 8063I COLORADO August 7, 1990 Vincente Martinez 15236 Highway 52 Fort Lupton, CO 80621 Subject: ZPME-1680 - Request for a zoning permit for a mobile home to be used as a principal dwelling on a parcel of land described as Lot 8, Block 56, Aristocrat Ranchettes, Weld County, Colorado. Dear Mr. Martinez: T have scheduled a meeting with the Board of County Commissioners on Wednesday, September 12, 1990, at 9:00 a.m, to consider your application. This meeting will take place in the County Commissioners' Hearing Room, first floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado. It is recommended that you or a representative be in attenclarre to answer any questions the Board of County Commissioners might have with respect to your application. It is the responsibility of can applicant to see that a sign is posted on the property under consideration at least 10 days preceding the hearing date. Sometime prior to August 31, 1990, you or a representative should call me to obtain a sign to be posted on the site no later than September 2, 1990. The Department of Planning Services' staff will make a rennrmendatlon concerning this application to the Board of County Cr nniesioners. It is the responsibility of the applicant to call the Department of Planing Services' office a few days before the date of the Crmmi5sioners' hearing to obtain the reccomendation. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to call me. Respectfully, BAA M Grubb Current Planner oX®831. CERTIFICATE OF MAILING T hereby certify that I have placed a true and correct copy of the surrounding property owners and owners and lessees of minerals in accordance with the notification requirements of Weld County in Case Number ZPME-1680 for Vincent Martinez in the United States Mail, postage prepaid First Class Mail by postal card as addressed on the attached list. this 10th day of August, 1990. T0: SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS The Weld County Board of County Commissioners will bold a public hearing on Wednesday September 12, 1990, at 9:00 a.m. in the County Commissioners' Hearing Roam. first floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado, concerning the request of: CASE NUMBER: ZPME-1680 APPLICANT: Vincente Martinez REQUEST: Mobile Home Zoning Permit for a principal dwelling LEGAL: Lot 8, Block 56, Aristocrat Rancbettes, Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Approximately 2 miles east of Fort Lupton at the northwest corner of Good Avenue and Richard Street For more information call Brian A. Grubb, Current Planner. WELD COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES 915 10th Street - Room 342 Greeley, CO 80631 Phone 356-4000, Ext. 4400 n^^4 MAILING LIST Vincente Martinez ZPMH-1680 Aurelio G. and Rosie Estrada 750 South Lowell Denver, CO 80219 Arthur W. , Jr., and Marion Starck 13009 Boykin Plate Upper Marlboro, MD 20772 Virginia K. Smith 15253 Barley Avenue Fort Lupton, CO 80621 Leon A. and Sally C. Finley 7075 Harold Street Fort Lupton, CO 80621 Virgil and Goldie Lyons 7115 Harold Street Fort Lupton, CO 80621 James L. and Betty J. Stewart 7166 Harold Street Fort Lupton. CO 80621 Daniel Martinez 15126 Colorado Highway 52 Fort Lupton, CO 80621 Lucien, Jr., and Viola M. Bendron 1710 Avenidale Del Sol Tucson, AZ 85710 Daniel J. Morgan 3060 East Bridge Street, #140 Brighton. CO 80601 Virginia L. and Leonard Turley 7256 Harold Street Fort Lupton, CO 80621 Rafael and Irene Garcia 8470 Dawson Drive Denver, CO 80229 Charles Siebert Barbara Cook 7217 Richard Street Fort Lupton, CO 80621 n 331 MAILING LIST Vincente Martinez ZPMB-1680 Page 2 Robert L. Schuerman P.O. Box 437 Fort Lupton, CO 80621 Tarasiuk Matmej 15338 Lamb Street P.O. Box 344 Fort Lupton, CO 80621 George E. and Patricia A. Castor 7258 Richard Street Fort Lupton, CO 80621 Mary C. Goure 15427 Coleman Avenue Fort Lupton, CO 80621 eC Oa" i _AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS SURFACE ESTATE Application No. / Subject Property c hi %n ��s//ASIA! �'r 0Az / vii� /74 . d0n G 42 / Ldi p I3 /ec /Cs6 jec4NdFi//Ai STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. COUNTY OF WELD ) THE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn, states that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names. addresses and the corresponding Parcel Identification Number assigned by the Weld County Assessor o£ the owners of property (the surface estate) within five hundred (500) feet of the property subject to the application. This list was compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor, or an ownership update from a title or abstract company or attorney, derived from such records, or from the records of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. The list compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor shall have been 1� asseay d4:11wkionc thirty (30) days of the application submission date. Js-lsc�r —14 per. ,Uf3 k L, is/ 7r 'AA As 5erf,gt going instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me this 10— day of QaLc.\,alt. = 19.51. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Hy Commission expires: My Commission Expires i•b. 13, 1943 \ a v n S1 Ndtary Pu lit SCO93.. IIP r NAMES OF OWNERS OF PROPERTY WITHIN 500 FEET Please print or type. NAME ADDRESS, TOWN/CITY, ASSESSOR'S PARCEL STATE AND ZIP CODE IDENTIFICATION 0 AURELIO G.& ROSIE 750 S. LOWELL ESTRADA DENVER,CO. 80219 1309-27-3-19-001 SAME SAME 1309=27-3-19-002 SAME SAME 1309-27-3-19-003 SAME SAME 1409-27-3-19-00.6 ARTHUR W.JR.& MARION 13009 BOYKIN PLACE `-i1-av c\S UPPER MARLBORO MD_20772 1309-27-3-19-005 VIRGINIA KATHERINE 15253 BARLEY AVE. SMITH FORT LUPTON CO.80621 1309-27-3-1 $-001 SAME SAME 1309-27-3-18-002_ SAME SAME 1309-27-3-18-943 SAME SAME 1309-27-3-18-00k SAME SAME 1309-27-3-18-005 SAME SAME 12.09-27-3-18-006 SAME SAME 1309-27-3-'S-007 SAME SAME 1309-27-4-18-008 LEON A.& SALLY C* 7075 HAROLD ST. PINLEY FORT UPTON CO.806211 1309-27-3-17-00_5 ViRG1L & GO1DIE 7115 HAROLD ST. LYONS FORT LUPTON CO.80621 1309-27-3-16-005 JAMES L.& BETTY J. 7166 HAROLD ST. STEWART FORT LUPTOX CO.80621 1309-27-3-15-001 • SAME SAME 1309-27-3-15-092 VIRGIL & GOLDIE 7115 HAROLD ST. LYONS FORT LUPTON,C0.80621 1309-27-3-16-006 DANIEL',MARTINEZ 1 1126 COLO. HWY 52 LuUIEN JR. & VIOLA M. 1 i liELT,CE DE_2A1, 1309-27-3-15-003 _ GENDRON TUCSON AZ.- 85710 1309-27-3-15-005 DANIEL J. KORGAN 3060 E.BRIDG1- #140 BRIGHTON CO.80601 1309-27+15-006 JAMES L.& BETTY J. 7166 HAROi15 $T. STEWART FORT. LUPTON CO.80621 1309-27-3-15-007 VIRGINIA L.& LEONARD 7256 HAROLD ST. TURLEY FORT LUPTON CO. 80621 1309-27-3-12-002 SAME SAME 1309-2'Z 3-12-003- RAFAEL & IREgE 8470 DAWSON DR. �j C}ArOTA DPVIIRR nn sn229 13Q9-27-1-1•2053t.CHARLES SIEBERT 7217 RICHARD ST. BARBARA COOK FORT LUPTON COQ 80621 1309-27-3-12-005 OVER ROBERT L. P.O.BOX 437 SCHEUERMAN FORT LUPTON CO.80621 1309-27-3-12-006 MATWEJ TARASIUK 15338 LAMB ST.P,O.BOX 344 FORT LUPTON CO.80621 1309-27-3-12-007 viRGINIA L.& LEONARD 7256 HAROLD ST. TURLEY FORT LUPTON' Co. 80621 1309-27-3-12-008 GEORGE E.& PATRICIA A 7258-RICHARD sT. CASTOR FORT LUPTON CO. 80621 1309-27-3-13-001 MARY C. GOITRE 15427 COLEMAN AVE. FORT LUPTON CO. 80621 1309=27-3-13-002 SAME SAME 1309-27-3-13-003 L SCC-, • J' RESOLUTION RE: APPROVE SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND AMENDED SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT - JEFFERSON WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners held a public hearing on the 12th day of September, 1990, at the hour of 10:00 a.m. in the Chambers of the Board for the purpose of hearing the application of Joy A. Jefferson, 35 Martin Lane, Englewood, Colorado 80110, for a Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit for a livestock confinement operation (1,500 cattle) , horse boarding and training facility (150 hear) , and tack and feed store on the following described real estate, to-wit: Part of the SE3 of Section 32, Township 7 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado WHEREAS, said applicant was represented by R. Russell Anson, Attorney, and WHEREAS, Section 24.4.2 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance provides standards for review of said Special Review Permit, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners heard all of the testimony and statements of those present, has studied the request of the applicant and all o£ the exhibits and evidence presented in this matter and, having been fully informed, finds that this request shall be approved for the following reasons: 1. The submitted materials are in compliance with the application requirements of Section 24.7 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 2. It is the opinion of the Board of County Commissioners that the applicant has shown compliance with Section 24.4.2 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: a. The proposal is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. b. The proposal is consistent with the intent o£ the district in which the use is located. 900826 pLoD5o de 160•Seakei; ju % Wu,da.R., Page 2 RE: AMENDED USR - JEFFERSON c. The permitted uses will be compatible with the existing surrounding land uses. d. The permitted uses will be compatible with the future development of the surrounding area as permitted by the existing zone and with future development as projected by the Comprehensive Plan of the County and the adopted master plans of affected municipalities. e. The applicant has demonstrated a diligent effort to conserve productive agricultural land in the locational decision for the proposed use. f. There is adequate provision for the protection of the health, safety and welfare of the inhabitants of the neighborhood and the County. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the application for a Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit for a livestock confinement operation (1,500 cattle, horse boarding and training facility (150 head) , and tack and feed store on the hereinabove described parcel of land be, and hereby is, granted subject to the following conditions: 1. The attached Development Standards for the Special Review permit shall be adopted and placed on the Special Review plat prior to recording the plat. The plat shall be delivered to the Department of Planning Services and be ready for recording in the Weld County Clerk and Recorder' s office within 15 days of approval by the Board of County Commissioners. 2. The Special Review activity shall not occur nor shall any building or electrical permits be issued on the property until the Special Review plat is ready to be recorded in the office of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. 3. Prior to exceeding the number of animal units allowed by right on the property, the applicant shall provide evidence to the Department of Planning Services that the Weld County Health Department has determined the facility to be in compliance with the Colorado Guidelines for Feedlot Runoff Containment. 900826 Page 3 RE: AMENDED USR - JEFFERSON 4. Within 45 days of approval by the Board of County Commissioners, an ISDS Evaluation on all existing septic systems shall be performed and the required septic permits on the existing systems shall be obtained. 5. All cattle feeding operations shall cease within six months and that portion of this Use by Special Review allowing cattle feeding shall become void under the following conditions: a) If substantial development occurs on property located within 1,000 feet of the Use by Special Review area pursuant to building permits issued by the Town of Windsor and pursuant to an approved Development Master Plan and Utility Plan and approved final plat as required by the Town of Windsor annexation agreement or regulations; or b) If substantial development occurs within 1,000 feet of the Use by Special Review area pursuant to building permits issued by Weld County and pursuant to a recorded final P.U.D. plan or final subdivision plat approved by the Weld County Board of County Commissioners. c) "Substantial development" shall mean issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy by the Town or County for a residential structure or for a commercial or industrial structure with greater than 5,000 square feet of floor area. 6. Prior to recording the Special Review permit plat: the plat shall be amended to show an additional 20 feet of right-of-way reserved from the centerline of Weld County Road 74. the signs on the property shall be brought into compliance with the requirements of Section 42.2 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 7. Within 30 days of approval by the Board of County Commissioners, the applicants shall provide evidence to the Department of Planning Services that an employee restroom approved by the Weld County Department of Health, has been provided on the site. 900826 Page 4 RE: AMENDED USR - JEFFERSON 8. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the portion of the Use by Special Review authorizing cattle feeding shall become void on September 12, 1995. Applicant may reapply for a Use by Special Review according to the then existing procedures for that use, without fee, on or before that date if applicant wishes to continue the cattle feeding operation. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 12th day of September, A.D. , 1990. ifilialteL7 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: WE COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County Clerk to the Board /Alt A 4. AYE m Gene R. Brantner, Chairman / / a NAY �t/, a^2. t , 14. ` ca.-), le G rge Kennedy, Pro-Te , Deputy Clerk to the Board ��yy,,� 44 YE APPROVED TO FORM: Constance Bar e t C;:;i ° EXCUSED C.W. I County Attorney AYE 900826 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS JOY A. JEFFERSON 1. The Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review permit is for a livestock confinement operation (1,500 cattle) , horse boarding and training facility (150 head) , and tack and feed store as submitted in the application materials on file in the Department of Planning Services and subject to the Development Standards stated hereon. 2. Approval of this plan may create a vested property right pursuant to Article 68 of Title 24 C.R.S. , as amended. 3. The applicant shall remove, handle, and stockpile manure from the livestock confinement area in a manner that will prevent nuisance conditions. The manure piles shall not be allowed to exist or deteriorate to a condition that facilitates excess odors, flies or inspect pests, or pollutant runoff. The manure storage site shall have a water-tight surface which does not permit seepage or percolation of manure pollutants into the ground. 4. The Special Review permit site shall be maintained in compliance with the Colorado Guidelines for Feedlot Runoff Containment. 5. Waste oil, waste paints, stains, treatments, spent drug containers, empty livestock dip containers, anti-freeze, and other associated liquid and solid wastes, shall be stored and removed for final disposal in a manner that protects against surface and groundwater contamination. 6. An Air Emissions Permit shall be obtained from the Air Pollution Control Division, Colorado Department of Health, for fugitive dust, if required. 7. No permanent disposal of wastes shall be permitted at this site. 900826 Page 2 RE: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - JEFFERSON 8. Wood shavings, sawdust, and waste materials shall be handled, stored, and disposed of in a manner that controls fugitive dust, blowing debris, and other potential nuisance conditions. 9. Fugitive dust shall be controlled on this site. 10. The facility shall provide an employee restroom with toilets served by an approved septic sewer treatment system. 11. The property shall be maintained in compliance with the requirements of Sections 45 and 47 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 12. The Special Review permit shall not be transferable to any successors in interest to the described property and shall terminate automatically upon conveyance or lease of the property to others for operation of the facility. 13. The property shall be maintained in compliance with the signage requirements as set forth in Section 42.2 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 14. All construction on the property shall be in accordance with the requirements of the weld County Building Code Ordinance. 15. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Design Standards o£ Section 24.5 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 16 . The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Operation Standards of Section 24.6 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 17. Personnel from the Weld County Health Department and Weld County Department of Planning Services shall be granted access onto the property at any reasonable time in order to ensure the activities carried out on the property comply with the Development Standards stated hereon and all applicable Weld County Regulations. 900826 Page 3 RE: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - JEFFERSON 28. The Special Review area shall be limited to the plans shown hereon and governed by the foregoing Standards and all applicable Weld County Regulations. Major changes from the plans or Development Standards as shown or stated shall require the approval of an amendment of the Permit by the Weld County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners before such changes from the plans or Development Standards are permitted. Any other changes shall be filed in the office of the Department of Planning Services. 19. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with all of the foregoing Development Standards. Noncompliance with any of the foregoing Development Standards may be reason for revocation of the Permit by the Board of County Commissioners. 900826 r CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL AMENDED USR-735 JOY A. JEFFERSON 1. The attached Development Standards for the Special Review permit shall be adopted and placed on the Special Review plat prior to recording the plat. The plat shall be delivered to the Department of Planning Services and be ready for recording in the Weld County Clerk and Recorder's office within 15 days of approval by the Board of County Commissioners. 2. The Special Review activity shall not occur nor shall any building or electrical permits be issued on the property until the Special Review plat is ready to be recorded in the office of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. 3. Prior to exceeding the number of animal units allowed by right on the property, the applicant shall provide evidence to the Department of Planning Services that the Weld County Health Department has determined the facility to be in compliance with the Colorado Guidelines for Feedlot Runoff Containment. 4. Within 45 days of approval by the Board of County Commissioners, an ISDS Evaluation on all existing septic systems shall be performed and the required septic permits on the existing systems shall be obtained. 5. Within 6 months of approval of a final POD plan or final plat application by the Board of County Commissioners or the Town of Windsor, on property located within 500 feet of the use by special review area, the cattle feeding operation approved as part of Amended USR-735 shall cease and became void. 6. Prior to recording the Special Review permit plat: - the plat shall be amended to show an additional 20 feet of right-of-way reserved from the centerline of Weld County Road 74 and the elimination of all but one access onto the property. - the signs on the property shall be brought into compliance with the requirements of Section 42.2 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 7. Within 30 days of approval by the Board of County Commissioners, the applicants shall provide evidence to the Department of Planning Services that an employee restroom approved by the Weld County Department of Health, has been provided on the site. 9CeS^3 SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS JOY A. JEFFERSON AMENDED DSR-735 1. The Site Specific Development Plan and Spacial Review permit is for a livestock confinement operation (1.500 cattle), horse boarding and training facility (150 head) , and tack and feed store as submitted in the application materials on file in the Department of Planning Services and subject to the Development Standards stated hereoa. 2. Approval of this plan may create a vested property right pursuant to Article 68 of Title 24 C.R.S., as amended. 3. The applicant shall remove, handle, and stockpile manure from the livestock confinement area in a manner that will prevent nuisance conditions. The manure piles shall not be allowed to exist or deteriorate to a condition that facilitates excess odors, flies or inspect pests, or pollutant runoff. The manure storage site shall have a water-tight surface which does not permit seepage or percolation of manure pollutants into the ground. 4. The Special Review permit site shall be maintained in compliance with the Colorado Guidelines for Feedlot Runoff Containment. 5. Waste oil, waste paints, stains. treatments, spent drug containers. empty livestock dip containers, anti-freeze, and other associated liquid and solid wastes, shall be stored and removed for final disposal in a manner that protects against surface and groundwater contamination. 6. An Air Emissions Permit shall be obtained from the Air Pollution Control Division, Colorado Department of Health, for fugitive dust, if required. 7. No permanent disposal of wastes shall be permitted at this site. 8. Wood shavings, sawdust, and waste materials shall be handled, stored, and disposed of in a manner that controls fugitive dust. blowing debris, and other potential nuisance conditions. 9. Fugitive dust shall be controlled on this site. 10. The facility shall provide an employee restroom with toilets served by an approved septic sewer treatment system. 11. The property shall have only ona access to the property from Weld County Road 74. ✓CCS-,J • Development Standards Joy A. Jefferson Page 2 12. The property shall be maintained in compliance with the requirements o£ Sections 45 and 47 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 13. The Special Review permit shall not be transferable to any successors in interest to the described property and shall terminate automatically upon conveyance or lease o£ the property others for operation of the facility. 14. The property shall be maintained in compliance with the signage requirements as set forth in Section 42.2 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 15. All construction on the property shall be in accordance with the requirements of the Weld County Building Code Ordinance. 16. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Design Standards of Section 24.5 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 17. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Operation Standards of Section 24.6 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 18. Personnel from the Weld County Health Department and Weld County Department of Planning Services shall be granted access onto the property at any reasonable time in order to ensure the activities carried out on the property comply with the Development Standards stated hereon and all applicable Wald County Regulations. 19. The Special RavieW area shall be limited to the plans shown hereon and governed by the foregoing Standards and all applicable Weld County Regulations. Major changes from the plans or Development Standards as shown or stated shall require the approval of an amendment of the Permit by the Weld County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners before such changes from the plans or Development Standards are permitted. Any other changes shall be filed in the office of the Department of Planning Services. 20. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with all of the foregoing Development Standards. Noncompliance with any of the foregoing Development Standards may be reason for revocation of the Permit by the Board of County Commissioners. 9CCP7r BOARD OF COUNTY COMMSSIONERS SIGN POSTING CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER THE PENALTIES OF PERJURY THAT THE SIGN PROVIDED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES WAS POSTED ON THE PROPERTY AT LEAST 10 DAYS BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER'S HEARING FOR CASE # ic-ylai R--R5 . THE SIGN WAS POSTED BY: •n GO ., C m SCar � //r) Vi �;OTA R Ytic NAME OF PERSON POS SIGN .a. 15' -.1Q, c'O .°�Q sI i STATE OF COLORADO ) COUNTY OF WELD ) • SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS � DAY OF bti� ;19 so . L SEAL %Act CkooA N ARY PUBLIC My Cwrmlrbo E+pp a hb. 13, 1993 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES LAST DAY TO POST SIGN IS: 19 SCO13', *'' PLANNING COMCIISSION SIGN POSTING CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER THE PENALTIES OF PERJURY TEAT THE SIGN PROVIDED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES WAS POSTED ON THE PROPERTY AT LEAST 10 DAYS BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING FOR CASE # '✓\SR- 735 THE SIGN WAS POSTED BY: Sce,fr- DIARY '4, NAME NAME OF PERSON POSTING SIGN ;7 iris`Oe t SIGPATGRE 0 PPLICANT STATE OF COLORADO ) COUNTY OF WELD ) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS �• DAY OF (\k.,N. �> SEAL C-4\tz/IA, A c1te NOTARY PUBLIC 1 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES M' 1.'r `)5 Pa' 13' 1993 LAST DAY TO POST SIGN IS: 19 QCes'3 STATE OF COLORADO ) )s.s. COUNTY OF WELD ) David S. Reynolds, being duly sworn, says that he is publisher of The New News, a weekly newspaper published in Keenesburg in said County and State; that said newspaper has a general circulation in said County and has been continously and uninterruptedly published therein, during a period of at least fifty-two consecutive weeks prior to pfu�� CYpY7�. ,. the first publication of the annexed notice; that said newspaper is a .a,'�"` c�° a newspaper within the meaning of the Am�` p•qwed 12.7;i6' , act of the General Assembly of the for ' a'1 �Pxi State of Colorado, entitled "An Act •c�""ww�e to regulate the printing of legal ,� M� notices and advertisements, " and + ' amendments thereto; that the notice y+ ir ` rwtiaKr+a� c of which the annexed is a printed �M.0 et sect ,, r.rt ol copy taken from said newspaper, waspub 'M'�Wu eR Wq�'� P thelished regularnandlentirepissue of in ��Ei'��t`u�mmR every number thereof, ,="fth �g“Liamek tap �" '17=5 and /1q�9 p�p�,x, a sere e once a week for co fir:PIGS me'MIL nod successive weeks; that said notice io ' 1°rtntwe�acve l remitPtPa� was so published in said newspaper Nmor proper and not in any supplement � Nrr� wA thereof , and that the first &Dee �rc1..RK To RDE publication of said notice as ram* wpAto aforesaid, was on the _m �N..s'°c° °" ,� p�- �� day of 0 , 19 ! , an the last on the d b day of , 1 Subscribed and sworn o fore me this o2e2 day of ,450/./.....46-A.. , 19a. My Commission expires Meth fy 1M) G , / �J "' f•rcil `?o of `Windsor j� J arc" "' '�yar ��'L/ // �� nasor �� N r °�F�;- 1, C% op 'SIP- ^ - r 301 WALNUT • WINDSOR, COLORADO80550 ' TELEPHONE: (303) 686-7476 September 11, 1990 Ms. Lanell Curry Weld County Department o£ Planning services 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 RE: Amended USR-735 Joy A. Jefferson Dear Lanell: The Windsor Planning Commission, at their regular meeting September 6, 1990, reconsidered the above mentioned Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit. After hearing testimony from those in attendance, the Planning Commissions motion to approve the horse training and boarding facility excluding the cattle feeding operation resulted in a tie vote. A subsequent motion to approve the project contingent upon compliance with the Weld County ' Planning Department's conditions of approval also resulted in a tie vote. The Windsor Planning Commission therefore has no recommendation for either approval or denial. I£ you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, T OF W�-IND$OR ea t6 - 6 et E. Lathrop jel fanner yr r C•r,-• ; ATTENDANCE RECORD September 12 . 1990 PLEASE write or print legibly your name, address and the name of the applicant or Docket # for the hearing you are attending. TODAY'S HEARINGS ARE AS FOLLOWS: DOCKET # 90-27 Jefferson, Special Review Permit DOCKET # 90-32 City of Longmont, Change o£ Zone DOCKET # 90-34 Flatiron Structures/Azalea Farms, Change of Zone NAME ADDRESS HEARING ATTENDING X44-, /Dl/ it l7ue lC -O /31 ill _ Mici s /043 aCrm‘GtvZ, SIP 9a - 34/ A--1�ja.. Trn n Pd tax aQ39 Lon �.-A4 Mt _6";3y Pelq ii "` /).€2O fib ear,Co/ Pi- • lirmc int t 4 P S ,. Lr s s cS-/r. �� -1 neitt An://,e,-, Ca go-9-2 eAL ii.�frief r �.c,ro 0/Vn8014a Dm .9:1/0./ 90 1 - l'a?aaZ, WW-0--05043 166 ter( A c tea•a vj h-), lat erg c c-c, 1O- z `7 /�{,�,/ /arc i e.•,- .7G/r"/ WCK /S— !/}_ e. 9D"Z7.it 4j�Y( )j2,6 / 2'.5-0 .; 6 'le( n-vA g-trP A /ell ?IQ- Z.7 04:icii,t4— ni0,, 9sis uG. e 92 - ii, riv/l„� f�� ; 22�,.,) s5-niPee-774 ' 9v -077 0,66-„ �J'st degj- 7� 2 477 y Or — '7 7 I PHASE 2 , , HARMONY ROAD' . V A icitir ANDSCAPED AREA re\ COMMERCIAL �) wtits v% H 257 LANDSCAPE BUFFE LANDSC/E BUFFER LI t'� ` s • ♦ CA\ 41=1 i sz... e LANDSCAPED AREA P ."• R `/ 1e,• LANDSCAPED AREA E \----1 Kt � ..' R t Vt T VS., Y Baliql p /4% k 0 ql :t‘d a1 / %,,,c4 l 1 R V J / Y 2,.....(--2 o ,_ , •i I i EXHIBIT HARRISON RESOURCE 41F E'C0 � C O R P O R A T I O N R. RUSSELL ANSON ?7 ATTORNEY AT LAW C��r J _6 THE LAW BUILDING TO THE v .L 10RO, BOX326 U ITH AVENUE GREELEY, COLORADO 80632 (303)353.5508 TELECortEA:(303)356.1111 August 14, 1990 Janet E. Lathrop Windsor Planning Commission 301 Walnut windsor, CO 80550 Re: Case Number Amended USR-735 Dear Planning Commission: Be advised that this office represents Joy and Scott Jefferson concerning their application for an Amended USR-735. This letter is 1n response to your letter of August 8, 1990 and concerning the Planning Commission meeting o£ August 2, 1990. In reviewing the letter from Janet Lathrop and the enclosed "unofficial minutes" it is my opinion that the action of the windsor Planning Commission concerning the Jeffersons' case is a substantial violation of Jeffersons' right to procedural due process and thereby a violation of 42 USC Sec. 1983. See Sclavenitis v. Cherry Hills Board of Adjustment, 751 P.2d 661 (Colo. App. 1988) whereunder the Board of Adjustment of Cherry Hills village took additional testimony and evidence subsequent to its formal hearing and based upon that evidence denied the property owners application. As I understand it, the Jeffersons' case was not even on the agenda but was added at the request of Mr. Ehrlich without any type of notice to the property owners, the Jeffersons. I am also concerned about some of the statements that were made to the windsor Planning Commission that were not based on any factual evidence. Most of the concerns would be answered by development standards proposed by the weld County Planning Services if the Board of County Commissioners approves the Jeffersons' application. As Mr. Ehrlich had even mentioned to you, your decision has significant impact on the decision of the Board of County Commissioners. By reversing your decision without notice to Mr. Jefferson you have violated the Jeffersons' civil rights under 42 USC Sec. 1983. Demand 1s herein made upon you to SCOR )3 . Janet Lathrop Windsor Planning Commission August 14, 1990 Page Two rescind the action of your August 2, 1990 meeting and that you withdraw the August 8, 1990 letter submitted to the weld County Board of ty Commissioners. very t, 1 urs, G� Gi' � S son torney at Law RRA:yd pc: Scott and Joy Jefferson • SCr'' C - . .> • 4 ' ~ CONDITION le( AC vi(i& 1 All cattle feeding operations will cease and that portion of p,//cf iol] Calfie ferrlin �ha/l A this U.S.A. -become void vunder the followingc ndi _ sti /t / - - 04 Fe a) If substantial development occursAwithhiwn�lOrAfeet of the U.S.R. area pursuant to building permits issued by the Town o£ Windsor and pursuant to an approved Development Master Plan and Utility Plan and approved final plat as required by the Town of Windsor annexation agreement or regulations; or „� X44 10M b) If substantial development occurs within S00- feet of the U.S.R. area pursuant to building permits issued by Weld County and 5W0do✓ pursuant to a final P.U.D. plan or final plat approved by the Weld A County Board of County Commissioners. "SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT" Alternative 1 Substantial Development shall mean completion and final approval of a foundation for a residential structure or for a commercial or industrial structure with greater than 5000 square feet of floor area; construction and approval of internal roads serving the P.U.D.; and completion of water taps to the structure. Alternative 2 Substantial Development shall mean issuanceof a Certificate of Occupancy by the Town a 4 County for a residential structure or for a commercial or industrial structure with greater than 5000 square feet of floor area. I .9%1 OFin 3 r - DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS western wildlife Adventures USR-807 :87 :33 1 . The Special Review permit is for a recreational guest farm for raising and hunting game birds in the A (Agricultural) Zone District as submitted in the application materials on file in the Department of Planning Services and subject to the Development Standards stated herein. 2. The Special Review permit shall not be transferable to any successors in interest to the described property and shall terminate automatically upon conveyance or lease of the property to others for the operation of the facility. 3 . Hunting shall be conducted during the daylight hours only. This restriction shall not apply to operation of administrative or executive offices, or repair of the facilities located within the proposed site. 4. Five or more hunters using the property at any one time shall be supervised by the management of the facility. 5 . Signs shall be posted and maintained to clearly identify the boundaries of the hunting preserve to both the hunters and the surrounding inhabitants. Signs shall be posted at no less than 100 foot intervals. 6 . The Special Review site shall not be used as an outdoor shooting range for skeet, trap, pistol, or rifles. 7 . The Special Review permit shall be issued for 5 years or until April 30th following the issuance of a residential building permit in a recorded subdivision. or Planned Unit Development within 300 yards of the Special Review area,' • whichever occurs first. Any additional time shall be considered a new request and shall require approval of a new application in accordance with the weld County Zoning Ordinance. 8 . All construction on the property shall be in accordance with the requirements of the weld County Building, Cede Ordinance. 9 . The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Design Standards of Section 24 .5 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 871296 RESOLUTION RE: APPROVE CONTINUANCE OF HEARING TO CONSIDER AMENDED USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW - JEFFERSON WHEREAS, the Board o£ County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners held a public hearing on the 29th day of August, 1990, at the hour of 10:00 a.m. in the Chambers of the Board for the purpose of hearing the Amended Use by Special Review of Joy A. Jefferson, 35 Martin Lane, Englewood, Colorado 80110, and WHEREAS, at said hearing Commissioner Kirby excused himself due to a possible conflict of interest, and WHEREAS, R. Russell Anson, Attorney representing the applicant, requested that this matter be continued because there were only three Commissioners present at today's hearing, and WHEREAS, the Board received conflicting recommendations from the Windsor Planning Commission, and would like to have this matter clarified. WHEREAS, it was determined by the Board that this matter be continued to September 12, 1990. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the hearing to consider the Amended Use by Special Review for Joy Jefferson, be, and hereby is, continued to September 12, 1990, at 10:00 a.m. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that the Windsor Planning Commission be asked to clarify its position on the conflicting recommendations, and whether it properly reached that position. 9(0{23 900781 ,C • CONDITION All cattle feeding operations will cease if substantial development occurs on the adjacent property pursuant to building permits issued by the Town of windsor and pursuant to an approved development master plan and utility plan as required by the Town of Windsor Annexation Agreement. H��t �x f.Case i RESOLUTION RE: APPROVE CONTINUANCE OF BEARING TO CONSIDER AMENDED USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW - JEFFERSON WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Some Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs o£ Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners held a public hearing on the 29th day of August, 1990 , at the hour of 10:00 a.m. in the Chambers of the Board for the purpose of hearing the Amended Use by Special Review o£ Joy A. Jefferson, 35 Martin Lane, Englewood, Colorado 80110, and WHEREAS, at said hearing Commissioner Kirby excused himself due to a possible conflict of interest, and WHEREAS, R. Russell Anson, Attorney representing the applicant, requested that this matter be continued because there were only three Commissioners present at today's hearing, and WHEREAS, the Board received conflicting recommendations from the Windsor Planning Commission, and would like to have this matter clarified. WHEREAS, it was determined by the Board that this matter be continued to September 12, 1990. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the hearing to consider the Amended Use by Special Review for Soy Jefferson, be, and hereby is, continued to September 12, 1990, at 10:00 a.m. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that the Windsor Planning Commission be asked to clarify its position on the conflicting recommendations, and whether it properly reached that position. sc, V+` 900781 _ Page 2 RE: CONTINUE AMENDED USR HEARING - JEFFERSON The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 29th day of August, A.D. , 1990. �� BOARD or COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: I`n/ ikt La WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County Clerk to the Board EXCUSED n\, Gene R. Brantner, Chairman BY: O 1IA F lf, 7c// Me) Gfirge Kennel Fro-7 Deputy perk to the Board APPROVED AS TO FORM: Constance L. Hare t EXCUSED _ C.W. Kir County Attorney �- Go 900781 A CONDITION All cattle feeding operations will cease if substantial development occurs on the adjacent property pursuant to building permits issued by the Town of Windsor and pursuant to an approved development master plan and utility plan as required by the Town of Windsor Annexation Agreement. cwt EX ti C F7')s 1 r • CONDITION All cattle feeding operations will cease and that portion of ear HI toPfie feesbA!� &ha// this U.S.R. -become void "Under the following conditions: a) If substantial development occurs within 500 feet of the U.S.R. area pursuant to building permits issued by the Town of Windsor and pursuant to an approved Development Master Plan and Utility Plan and approved final plat as required by the Town of Windsor annexation agreement or regulations; or b) If substantial development occurs within 500 feet of the U.S.R. area pursuant to building permits issued by Weld County and pursuant to a final P.U.D. plan or final plat approved by the Weld County Board of County Commissioners. X4.41/ 47 T i 4,z ,roan "SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT" Alternative 1 Substantial Development shall mean completion and final approval of a foundation for a residential structure or for a commercial or industrial structure with greater than 5000 square feet o£ floor area; construction and approval of internal roads serving the P.U.D.; and completion of water taps to the structure. Alternative 2 Substantial Development shall mean issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy by the Town and County for a residential structure or for a commercial or industrial structure with greater than 5000 square feet of floor area. v�1i"7- i Jacob H. Stromberger Harold J. Stromberger 9910 Hwy 392 Windsor, CO 80550 August 27, 1990 _ — Town of_Windsor- " 301 Walnut Street Windsor, CO 80550 To Whom it may concern: As concerned citizens and members of the agricultural community, we are in favor o£ letting the feedlot on Weld County Road 74 continue to operate. The cattle fed in this lot utilize the feed that farmers in this area produce: such as corn, hay and other feed products. This is of great benefit to the surrounding farmers and to the community at large. Farmers have a local outlet for their feed products and this brings intone to both the farmers and the businesses in the community. Therefore, we feel that if the feedlot is not allowed to operate, the agricultural community and the business community of Windsor will suffer. Sincerely, tacobaadyr H. Stromberger Harold J. Stomberger JHS/EUS.sjg Sire .Sc F/0mtaur M i i • / ' BM • - .soa 1 ;_ / Z`1.3 .. .;�a STDri: Tn (/4 i it., ^.-r I• .__..._-1 o. \.•\ f �•` • •�• f / 1 .ara • I N r 51 gpen J s / 1 / •• �'•• • NN• ') I 1 s • •� r %�,, Ilt . iok. Cana r • • ( '• �,, �I, � ' , . 'Rn No 1+,, • i' 1 P t ; 1 • y F . • 0 1 • • 1 3 8060 •• a) . . 7 t; '6m - • 4 ( 10 V ••• •• '" �./ �: �•• /\. • ~ p ' 1 % r \: •• •Avery i C 1 ..r.. :roc _^�•• f fits• ` ..Y . a� :1 17 o \•1;+ ; : ii• :i :Y. • .' : L •C. Os .e0. ••• ..._.. e �. . -� y _ 1 ;.- Bw - - �.!' 't Pa!" Mai, G'r j • 6a .... BN 7 � .�'/ ,./•I • - •.•I g . �•i a4GGS •760 . --• .�_ �L•�11 6 ' ` �R 794 ?8 1. • 'Windsor . • . • C©S7 EsT/MATE Eye M H. i t.1 .. / Wie74 irei�ra. 8o/F 200/11. 4M oo � �`_ .. • ,r , 757&reiCross� 8O/� PZuO/F�. 16,OC1O '• . • 6 0M " /D RC ter/,10 '/ /6,509/ . P /7.A. 2817500 _._.... <,774 _ ' a ��- d 4, Manllo%• 3¢eo. /)200/eo. - 49 BAS • .: Zvi, dtce crcrri l Z1300 / SOD \ &net 4.2 d eric a'y ,Z 8y 000 /4000 �'` /4".1.1.1:a:w •C CO/if. Staliov to/je rAr / •35.000 35,0✓00 � ' ! . `int&Alaie 3i 800 • /O/4. 38, ,5©53?r "4,..27.. Ally. 392 ��evad,ei,,,ff got sayl. /6,000 -::- 06/ Raikal Somi.rWei k/r 260/A 43000 • , -.....„..--.7ao. OW Straacliceel rossinj Z/1. 200A /2,000 / • 4 �w ubtola( 5 K i/ /51 ii/,nin 744 47,f%meth p, awry :� 72,6/5-_, 1 '••so s l o ra/ 5510, 7/5 r oc��or4 ' e% _ *%" `yyy`yyy� +. ADMINISTRATION 894.2200 ll ♦ * CORPORATIONS 8942251 ,1 r', `.,M _ rt ELECTIONS 894.2211 •' 187 LICENSING& ENFORCEMENT 894.2214 "1 'DEMRr41ENT OF STATE LOBBYIStS NATALIE MEYER _tiatTE oadway—Suite 200 REGISTRATION 8942211 Secretary of State , l' Denver 80202 NOTARIES PUBLIC 894.2216 UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE 894.2243 September 4, 1990 Gene R. Brantner Weld County Commissioner PO Box 758 Greeley, CO 80632 Re: Advisory opinion per CRS 24-18-101 , et seq. Dear Mr. Brantner: CRS 24-18-111 authorizes the Secretary of State t0 issue advisory opinions to persons subject to the provisions of CRS 24-18-101 , et seq. Please be advised that the opinion which Is given Is advisory only. Also be advised that the response made will be part of a public file, however your name and address will be deleted to protect your privacy. Your question is whether the fact that Mr. Anson, a former employee of the County and chair of the Republican party will be presenting a toning application for a Use by Special Review presents a conflict for your voting on the proposal given than Mr. Anson Is responsible for publishing a brochure Concerning Republican candidates for the up-coming election. The standard for Interaction on a board is stated in CRS 24-18--109(3)(a) which prohibits a member from voting and from attempting to influence the other members of the body if the official has a substantial financial interest in the undertaking. This SectlOn clearly requires disclosure of the conflict and restraint from voting and from participating In the discussion surrounding the vote. CRS 24-18-109(3)(b) Carves out an exception for voting only to assure that the governing body is able to conduct its business. Since the standards of section (a) are specifically referenced in section (b), the member would be able to vote only if the participation is necessary to obtain a quorum or Otherwise enable the body to act. The member would not. however, be able to participate in the discussion if the conversation attempts to influence the decisions of the other members of the governing body in voting on the matter. CRS 24-18-110 requires that the board member disclose his interest In the matter before the board. That disclosure must Include the amount of hls financial interest, purpose and duration of his Services, and compensation received. The first auestlon Is whether having information published In a brochure is a substantial financial Interest In a matter before the board. The benefit to re(rn y ; EXHIBIT J ac you from the Republican party In this matter Is minimal ; the only concern would be whether an unfavorable ruling would influence the content of the information or result in the omission of your blo from the brochure. However, 1 assume that mechanisms are in place to assure that your candidacy is treated fairly. I do not believe the benefit to you from the Republican party Is direct enough to consistute a substantial financial Interest If you vote on this matter. Clearly, If the Concerns raised In the letter to thls offlee are disclosed to the Board prior to the matter being presented, then the disclosure will Serve t0 remOve any possible appearance of conflict even though n0 actual conflict exists. Full disclosure of the situation should be considered not only properly ablding by the ethical standards required by statute but also refraining from even an appearance of impropriety. Then, full participation in the matter before the board should be appropriate. I trust the above answers your question. If you have further questions, please feel free to write for clarification. IY. . eatij Natall Meyer Seer ary of State 2(4C:59 e% 1 O"O4O C _ IS' 'D9 p -, f li "" C• 'w * o r4\ * A0MINISTRATION 894.2200 r,, ,_••.` * * CORPORATIONS 894.2231 �•__,_..•. a * ELECTIONS 8944211 7gp6 LICENSING 6 kV•"•'' ENFORCEMENT 894.2214 DEPARTMENT OF STATE LOBBYISTS NATALIE MEYER 1500 Broadway—Suite 200 REGISTRATION 894-2211 Secretary of State Denver 80202 NOTARIES PUBLIC 894.2215 UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE 894.2243 September 4, 1990 Constance L. Harbert Weld County Commissioner PO Hex 768 Greeley, CO 80632 Re: Advisory opinion per CRS 24-18-101 , et seq. Dear Ms. Harbert: CRS 24-18-111 authorizes the Secretary of State t0 Issue advisory opinions t0 persons subject to the provisions of CRS 24-18-101 , et seq. Please be advised that the opinion which Is given Is advisory only. Also be advised that the response made will be part of a public flee, however your name and address will be deleted to protect your privacy. Your question Is whether the fact that Mr. Anson, a former employee of the County and chair Of the Republican party will be presenting a zoning application for a Use by Special Review presents a conflict for your voting On the proposal given that Mr. Anson Is responsible for publishing a brochure concerning Republican candidates for the up-coming election. The standard for interaction on a board is stated in CRS 24-18-109(3)(a) which prohibits a member from voting and from attempting to Influence the other members of the body If the official has a substantial financial Interest In the undertaking. This section clearly requires disclosure of the conflict and restraint from voting and from participating In the discussion surrounding the vote. CRS 24-18-109(3)(b) carves out an exception for voting only to assure that the governing body Is able to conduct its business. Since the standards of section (a) are specifically referenced In section (b), the member would be able to vote only If the participation is necessary to obtain a quorum or otherwise enable the body to act. The member would not, however, be able t0 participate in the discussion If the conversation attempts to influence the decisions of the other members of the governing body In voting on the matter. CRS 24-18-110 requires that the board member disclose his Interest is the matter before the board. That disclosure must include the amount of his financial interest, purpose and duration of his services, and compensation received. The first question Is whether having Information published In a brochure Is a substantial financial Interest In a matter before the board. The benefit to (Tern,- � FX►i��l� )L you from the Republican party in this matter Is minimal ; the only concern would be whether an unfavorable ruling would influence the content of the Information or result In the omission of your blO from the brOChure. However, I assume that mechanisms are In place to assure that your candidacy Is treated fatriy. 1 do not believe the benefit to you from the Republican party Is direct enough to consistute a substantial financial Interest If you vote on this matter. Clearly, If the concerns raised In the letter to this office are disclosed to the Board prior to the matter being presented, then the disclosure will serve to remove any possible appearance of conflict even though no actual conflict exists. Full disClosure of the situation Should be considered not only properly abiding by the ethical standards required by statute but also refraining from even an appearance of impropriety. Then, full partlCipation In the matter before the board should be appropriate. 1 trust the above answers your question. If you have further questions, please feel free to write for clarification. nc y. Natall Meyer Secretary of State ©S? ., f i, tJ 11 y t �. b/ H' 4 d• ;1 f. `4q f 4 1 ,\ •/,el ) : ::/, <1 1 i !I i y,. 1a. • <^ N h '/l 1 I, r� i. 1 " < _ g •1� `. • -. 1 'd ' F,� • 4 "611yMyT< 1tl1 K • tl i - 1 ; � r. 1. �, ` ,7 ,y •� • S `J, 1 }r i �,)fr.• . . M • 1 ,1 ki J/P w..,2. xS ly • {10l},.1 , sr _ zf • _ ... 4•-• _ 1'R • � _ ' _ }h. • 11. :, rti 0; 31$ k, • . gr;ntn-)_' 4 • i it' x \•-\ \ LS \ \ 1--. • • • • • • • ' . Fy• •-.r. 'two • to, Jacob H. Stromberger Harold J. Stromberger 9910 Hwy 392 Windsor, CO 80550 August 27, 1990 Town of.Windsor- -.._ - 301 Walnut Street • Windsor, CO 80550 To wham it may concern: As concerned citizens and members of the agricultural community, we are in favor of letting the feedlot on Weld County Road 74 continue to operate. The cattle fed in this lot utilize the feed that farmers in this area produce: such as corn, hay and other feed products. This is of great benefit to the surrounding farmers and to the community at large. Farmers have a local outlet for their feed products and this brings intone to both the farmers and the businesses in the community. Therefore, we feel that if the feedlot is not allowed to operate, the agricultural community and the business community o£ Windsor will suffer. Sincerely, l , /, r f. Pitt( 7/ frH. Stromberger Harold J. Stonber er g y� JHS/FCJS:s jg litt lre. ` :4 //kitty • EXHIBIT ; C 0°.; 91/-7,/90 • • II b c T r T REALTY CO. COLORADO, WYOMING, and NEBRASKA REALTORS TELEPHONE(303)352.1212 DENVER METRO 573.1672 12128th AVENUE GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 April 19, 1984 County of Weld, Colorado Department of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 GENTLEMEN: On behalf of my client, IntraWest Bank of Greeley, I submit this application for Recorded Exemption. This total parcel is approximately 76.2 acres, the proposed larger parcel will consist of approximately 51 acres of farmland. While the smaller parcel will represent approximately 25 acres consisting of two houses, numerous scales, outbuildings, storage sheds, approximately 2,500 head feed lot and feeding equipment. I have a party willing to complete the sale of the larger parcel and several interested in the 25 acre parcel without the farmland. Both parcels will continue to be operated by agricultural users through separate ownership. All prospective buyers have indicated a_willingness to accept one parcel as_a feed lot and the other for farmland use. end have indicated the whole unit economically unfeasible. This proposal is consistent with the County Comprehensive Plan and the Windsor Overlay District as it will take no agricultural land out of production while allowing the smaller parcel to continue at its present and best use. As per my discussion with Rick Lessner of the Town of Windsor Planning Department, this parcel will not affect efficient and orderly development. IntraWest Bank of Greeley owns approximately 82 acres Contiguous to the north of this parcel. Thank you for your consideration. . Sincerely, Patrick L. MCNear Realtor Farm and Ranch Division EXHIBIT PLM/cmf enclosures scot. s • tpu • DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE t303)3564000 EXT.406 015 10TH STREET aA ($, GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 t lei. • cc„ it �. COLORADO May 23, 1984 Board of County Commissioners Weld County Centennial Center 915 Tenth Street Greeley, CO 80631 Re: Recorded Exemption //RE 688 Dear Commissioners: The attached application, plat and related items are in reference to a request from Intra West Bank of Greeley for a recorded exemption. The parcel o£ land on which this request is being made is described as Pt. SE6t Section 32. T7N, R67W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. • The property is located 2 miles north of Windsor on WCR 74. The property contains approximately 76.2 acres of Class IVe, IVs, tile, tie irrigated and Vie, IVe nonirrigated soils. The parcel of land under consideration is not the total contiguous land holdings of the applicant. The request is to divide the property into parcels of 51.2 acres and 25 acres. more or less. The applicant would like to se a nces and farm improvements which includesVcorra system for a potential feedlot rom t e cropland. Based upon the submitted information and policies of the County. the Department of Planning Services staff recommends the request be approved for the following reasons: 1. The request complies with Section 9-2C. of the Weld County Subdivision Regulations submission requirements; and 2. The request complies with Section 9-2E. of the Subdivision Regulations as follows: The 76.2 acres, more or less, under consideration will be consistent with the intent of the agricultural zone district. Bath lots will continue to be used for agricultural production. The uses will be compatible with surrounding land uses, the use will be compatible with future development as projected by the Weld County Comprehensive land use plans. The proposal was reviewed by the city of Windsor and was found to comply with their long-range Comprehensive Plan. CI 4,00896 Board of County Commissioners Page 2 - The proposal is in compliance with Section 1-3 of the Weld County Subdivision Regulations and the proposed land division complies with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. Therefore, the proposed use is consistent with efficient and orderly development. • The proposal does not exist in an overlay district area. • The proposed lots meet minimum lot size requirements for land division. • North Weld County Water District has indicated adequate water service is available for this proposal. - The proposed lots are not part of a recorded exemption within the last five (S) years. • The two lots proposed will have adequate access from WCR 74. The Department of Planning Services staff recommendation for approval is conditional upon the following: 1. The applicant shall submit a mylar plat to the Department of Planning Services to be recorded in the office of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. The plat shall be drawn in accordance with the requirements of Section 9-2C. (4) of the Weld County Subdivision Regulations. The plat shall be submitted within ninety (90) days from the dace of approval by the Board of County Commissioners. Respectfully, Rod Allison Current Planner II • 00O9.9 7 I "If 29 1981 RESOLUTION yy// RE: APPROVAL OF RECORDED EXEMPTION NO. 68P CGIIIIRIM CW gam BANK OF GREELEY WHEREAS, the Board of County Commisisoners o£ Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners, pursuant to its authority under Section 30-28-101 (10) (d) , CRS, as amended, did determine at a public meeting held in the Chambers of the Board, that a certain parcel of land, to be divided into two parcels, as shown on the plat known as Recorded Exemption No. 688, does not come within the purview of the definition of the terms, "subdivision" and "subdivided land" , and WHEREAS , the request for Recorded Exemption No. 688 was sub- mitted by Intra West Bank of Greeley for property being located in Part of the SE;, Section 32, Township 7 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado, being more particularly described in the plat which shall be provided by the applicant and known as Exhibit "A" , said plat to be recorded, and WHEREAS, this request is to divide the property into par- cels of 51 . 2 acres and 25 acres, more or less, to allow the applicant to separate the residences and farm improvements from the cropland. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Com- missioners of Weld County, Colorado that the hereinabove de- scribed parcel of land be, and hereby is, exempt from the defi- nition of the terms, "subdivision" and • "subdivided land" . BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that this approval is conditional upon the applicant submitting a mylar plat to the Department of Planning Services to be recorded in the office of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. The plat shall be drawn in accordance with the requirements of Section 9-2C. (4) of the weld County Subdivision Regulations. The plat shall be submitted within ninety days from the date of approval by tha Board of County Commissioners. c (•0 LD:2ON RE #688 • LCD• y). l.,i✓ I '~ • • (2./cC ° Page 2 RE: RE #688 - INTRA WEST BANK OF GREELEY The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 23rd day of May, A.D. , 1984. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: gwit �J� WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County Clerk a�""n''d Recorder and Clerk to the Board Norman Carlson, Chairman By: ,• ,C7. D puty County C1 rk acque ne Jo n on, Pro-Tem APPROVED AS TO FORM: EXCUSED Gene R. Brantner • a717:fra c, p %:zeAC7 County Attorney C uck Carlson EXCUSED John T. Martin • o , Sr©' • 41�� LW° Y„-N_ I To of Win or" �,.t.t o . ,_itz7 rs.sr ` .M`.. .. .b....). it ,q P.O. BOX 627 WINDSOR, COLORADO 80550 l' 1.„' . 'p TELEPHONE (303) 686-7476 M1�P.psa May 8, 1984 II LAY 91984 i Mr. Rod Allison AIL, r�) Planner II Weld County Department of Planning iYEld Co- Planninc i:ammn:iar• 915 Tenth Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Dear Rod: The Windsor Planning Commission, at their regular meeting May 3, 1984, considered a recorded exemption request 2 miles north of Windsor from Intrawest Bank of Greeley. The Planning Commission recommended to the Weld County Planning Department approval of the recorded exemption with no stipulations. If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, TOWN OF WINDSOR ./ 1 Janet E. Lathrop Administrative Assistant jel SCOSalt.3 . t,(e 2 ..47.--. { , 0,E l • cutco m i i 1 —� � . vsI- MIPI_ x• �o Lo � \ ITv� _�� V • � � w %. vi vz , i V v J 1 � � �I Qe4 :,.. Z7 I , 1 . 1-. .O L a \ a. + or Eicu ii_ w q . � i 14 —3 • 'E y- n i� O o ° cO. , ,• r . b�:--. r. J a4 - 6iIr�� .�, a 3 n 1, '� q O Vi •r�i m 4 c � -- % 1 a< 4 'C • Iz--- %O � -I W Q ac 1 2 r o O I U ,Q k.OI ro om 1 - w . ,( , J C3C 1 • �f9� ?s :6 B 1101 REC 02040926 01/29/86 12:20 $9.00 1/u0s ,r. F 0309 MARX ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK & RECORDER WELD CO, CO • 4. AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this �;( _ day of JafifLy/ • , . 1985, by and between the • TOWN OF WINDSOR, ae✓ incorporated Colorado municipality, hereinafter referred to as "the Town " and AMIGO FARMS INC. , NORTHERN FRONT RANGE FARMS INC. , and ROBERT E. EHRLICH, hereinafter referred to as "Property Owners" or "Developers" ; WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Property Owners have submitted a petition for the annexation of certain property to the Town, and such annexation has been designated as the Windsor North Annexation; and WHEREAS, the Town expressed its intent to annex that certain real property known as the Windsor North Annexation by resolution passed by the Board of Trustees of the Town of Windsor on May 13, 1985; and WHEREAS, the proposed annexation complies in all respects with the Colorado Municipal Annexation Act of 1965; and WHEREAS, the Town desires to approve and accept the petition for annexation and to annex the Property Owners ' land to the Town of Windsor; and WHEREAS, by the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the parties desire to establish zoning districts and requirements for the subsequent subdivision and development of the property; NOW, THEREFORE, for the benefits to be derived by each and in exchange of the mutual covenants and performances of the parties hereto, IT IS AGREED BETWEEN THE PARTIES AS FOLLOWS: 1. The Town agrees that, upon the annexation • of the property, Tract A thereof comprising 293.382 acres of the Windsor North Annexation shall be zoned Planned Unit Commercial/ Development Industrial) in accordance with any present or subsequently adopted land use plan of the Town, and that Tract B comprising 448.244 acres of the Windsor North Annexation shall be zoned Planned Residential Development (PD-R) . The Developers agree that they shall not seek the approval of, and the Town shall not approve, any residential development in the Windsor North Annexatioq Commercial/ until at least ten per cent (10%) of the PUD Industrial) portion of the annexation, referred to above as Tract A, has been fully developed. The term "developed" shall be defined as • public improvements required by the Town pursuant to applicable ordinances and resolutions, together with 4 EXHIBIT �.c rl"a ' M. ;� S 1101 REC 02040926 01/29/86 12:20 $9.00 2/003 • F 0310 MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK b RECORDER WELD CO, CO completed construction of improvements for the uses permitted within the PUD (Industrial? Zone. Parking area • in excess of the minimum required by the Town for any completed improvement shall not be included as developed property. 2. The Town agrees that, subject to the provisions of this paragraph, the Windsor North Annexation may continue to be used for hunting purposes. The ,term "hunting" shall be defined as the present level bf�such activity existing upon the ground known as the Windsor North Annexation, and any modification thereof shall cause this right to be immediately extinguished in the sole discretion of the Town. It is understood that the Windsor North Annexation is divided into four separate parcels numbered 1 through 4. Upon the issuance o£ the first building permit for any development upon the Annexation, the hunting rights on the parcel for which the building permit has been issued shall be immediately and absolutely extinguished. In addition, should the application for a building permit call for the location of a structure within a 600-yard radius of an adjoining parcel, hunting shall likewise be extinguished upon that portion of the adjoining parcel within the 600-yard radius. 3. Prior to or contemporaneously with any application for the development of the Windsor North Annexation, the Developers shall comply with each of the following specific requirements: a. Submit and obtain approval of a master plan in conformance with the applicable provisions of the Code of the Town of Windsor. b. Submit and obtain approval of a utility plan which shall include the exclusive utilization of Town water and sew rvices for all deve 4. Prior to the submission and approval of any subdivision development in the Windsor North Annexation, the Developers agree that they shall, at their expense, cause a petition for annexation to be filed with the Town to annex those portions of County Roads 13, 15, 74, and 76 and State Highway 257 as may be impacted by the proposed subdivision development. The determination of which roads shall be impacted, thereby requiring annexation, shall be within the sole discretion of the Town. 5. This Agreement shall be a covenant which runs with the land. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, and that this Agreement shall be binding upon the parties hereto, their heirs, personal -2- cc:C.0 . B 1101 REC 02040926 01/29/86 12:20 89.00 3/003 F 0311 MARX ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERKS RECORDER WELD CO, CO !( , representatives, successors, and assigns, the same is made and entered into the day and year first written above. i TOWN OF WINDSOR, COLORADO p • �, ,j7 By f�!/e 4 j fra- N ATTEST:• �1F.....ti tz•L�.,/ W`ayor • 'Pro Clerk n . SEAL : AMIGO ice' , /: 1‘141.-4• • +A2TES�: i B / Pr/ dent .u�J l'0( OR I.v- Secretary NORTH ON FA N . i BY ATTEST: ' Pr sident Secretary • -3- 9CCIS a / :• . \ • ( BM • / ' , , � • • • ., 1 i .rt- • A• J • •,°' wa •wa Mrn • ( • Thompson Wee r • • i • �i • .� ( l , / • . ‘r \ ' .1 \‘ C • . , II o :•l WA wu •-u Lake Cawa1 • ) a ; ,� , 'RuN° r' ' � �0 •l . a. , FF • 7. (, :8 %lb-_- : •� � ,..i-\,.•✓9) •'L 10 ;,; t\ _ _ 3 y ( . .. I _.._ �,p� 0 • (^ L f i t w/° _ 4 . 1 C7 7 3 ' ( ' , we `• I • • • '• �'• a , sr C• �.• •Avec \ \, • „"••••...... . • . pro l ., Bw. / • J. - et .41 •1e 17 ; \1.. . :. . . rr CC \` `Windsor Lake • ; • \ ` 14'`x,• " • �.. fir__-._.... .�✓ p.i_jit• Ca 1 1, z DC:3 _ • Windsor ' .. • •e•`~ C©57" E577/14 ATE i • 1 Weir 74rWC1'osJii 8o/F 4 2o0A. ' /G,000 , ZSI arafCrbssr y 80/17 wolf). 1 G,00O ° "° � /b/R/0 �r/te. /6,,00//• . ',wolf). 7i3000 _7.777.°". Q7. •. 4'd4. �anhc% ' 3*ea. 6 Zoo/ev. 44 800 4%221. delted test.7\ Ggi4•Z eon /Crcrsi f ,Z $,OOO l/o,CY.0 ca •.®L"i? CiF. Stn�ioh ru/Dllr / 35GV O 35000 y --••�ar ii /}/• .391 .e»rigrC'ro a tot 200. /G,000 .BIN Revin s� .f zin/, ZGU/� /Z,000 l, �_—.,1 Gai ,PiroGtacete0esski 60/i ZOOA /Z,000 i" 1 , 4 _ // .✓-teht-o-1al x/00 ;1 EXHIBIT t /5X rligir7.r 4y�E9iixCtir:ryy� �'ar/i cy : 7ZI�o/S , 1 p e .. o rQ/ 554j 7/5 j , � v . i.. - o h .4. w u J .'i� a NJ \ ; • , A � ! .. • o l d^r, r 4 s 1114• \ / • . .._ !' w 1 i is. . ., � j ; s!l / .......--y• ' l - 1 �, ��_ a -) .� _ 101,6u l r, J•, 1 / A 41'1. I 1 _ ♦� • - /' � 0 • �- 1 I \ / / / N •. V o`°♦ OD- l /;/'llo 'tit :\ O " i• 'D /I.,`' \ pn / L.f ,;, NI' I • '+ ' n # n i" • ( (I,. .. Ip r� 1.1 4 _� 4 CC Y t� .. �2 O 4 I• li/ �� • la XI� III . .. a �Y _ ,'� c Aq4 �I� bb ,y . ► E � �. �'� ...1' 11 �� •� �,, '/ al a4, •: , -ho �H . if i /n �I �� - • ✓I�� . _ . _ 1 C y d J,. t,•7 77'�� v :� a .�� r '• • � .. -.. A / �� J 1 .' 1 . • • / g II r i �/ �x I / III ' / . �� S i �� 1< .iP _... • I / Ilp I i I � / ( p • so 1 N N / �.^� J r+ .IIV n 4rC N Cly �' (r {v ( w. C II - t ♦��- . I rQl -I p . e v a�J N �� '&'Kea:44440H r / 4(_ 0 . il • Ila ! "• I4 10 I • DITCH k I O.<pd °v, \ i1 14 i 4 �: • r av /27/ / ti LJ r n i P.1' W \ _ .r �b r I I • Y+.�J ♦ p s ill lfr -emu n _ • O :.I .4 •II Vl..� l9.-.... _ v+fsty g = O O r- O UI CJ n �. 5��'' ZCO me Mr CD a a 1sr3 Ng fir,: o 03 Pi 0 on C < 3 Z o R ^7; a • v. sC - m— tin 5 , .vP^n r✓� ��M•rLs. 3 Z 0 m O o I n' _<.v v� K rn 69 s Ls F, — nr V A " V _ } `� T (^ • W ,, Y/Milli V A N J _ <M e ® 1 1 m IIIIMIllr • i i i i is i i i i i i i i i i i 1.• ; ,° • . x .s . 7t_ _r/i - --- . • '' ' ( . , _ _ ... - .�" r , ` -. -l• / • + / .. • / , 'i .. i , r .. f- � ., : 1 �� 0 • �.. v V, i 6 •4 ,�f• ' �, • • • , I f Y '• . / y / r J ` y 6 i:' .. �� / WI � / /. v /. ' / ( r r t ' •_ 1'�� . r I ' +� ��e • qtr• I• _ _ • f _ _' ~ z � -' "` --_-,. • , t 7 4', • �. 1, 1 :1 in •;I _ r d, /: • �.\ 4 / f - ` • , i 1 " ' . {{ ,.f.%' �'� - , 1 [ , 1 , A ./, V• 1 i =` - /r P .,yam, :i" --? •. �- • �� . )J tip ••••• / j• _ 1.� .. 1 3. • '4,4:14, I. A • / .1 'f V_.• . - jib ..•r- / 44 } 1- •.} , 4. % % it :sirJf. • , , 1i `1.1 ! ' 4J-)1j _I ,.... \-i �_ 1 'e.v. irf. a. I c if • {(� • • + , ` y1., '� _ter. J / ./__! ! 4 r �� 1, A �1 � i i , i. l lV /• i '•� i� 1 ,. ! ' . I /d.1)11211 • ; J % _ 1• 1 i ,....._,; ( i ,. 1e 1 11 �_ r — W 0 0 E 3 Cl z - sty2 z- A .t± 0 �„ v -I m 0 f 'A`" c y, C C < K Z sva'� :§ _ A, r v, 3 o § w : —. -,� 0 m 1 0 o al �, � ricn } , ,. o ; x o � ►� e- z ".. 0m e. T fe V N � m f C3 o X x�> .-, 9 m r . Z. r.,. . � /t s _ >� y gi•g; set Z ; ,T r la , •• e +. C-1 --1 IS -.r- .,, IC o w r „_ 9 p• �r m la ® 0 N Richard E. Weiderspon 4828 East Harmony Road Port Collins, Colorado 80525 September 10, 1990 Dear: Weld County Commissioners Weld County is recognized as one of the largest agriculture based counties in the United States. The majority of the population in Weld County seems proud o£ their agriculture environment. My entire life has been closely involved with Weld County agriculture. The feedlot owned by Scott Jefferson and leased by Albert Harding contributes to the Weld County agriculture base. The feedlot purchased hay from my farm.and was operated in a professional manner. If this feedlot is closed, will it be replaced? As far as I know, a comparable feedlot does not exist in the area. - Please, keep that agriculture based pride, in mind, while making your decision. Sine rely yours Richard E. Weider p r EXk/B/t • Air9i ec 0` ^ :? di NOTICE Pursuant to the zoning laws of the State of Colorado and the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, a public hearing will be held in the Chambers of the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, First Floor, Greeley, Colorado, at the time specified. All persons in any manner interested in the Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit are requested to attend and may be heard. Should the applicant or any interested party desire the presence of a court reporter to make a record of the proceedings, in addition to the taped record which will be kept during the hearing, the Clerk to the Board s Office shall be advised in writing of such action at least five days prior to the hearing. The cost of engaging a court reporter shall be borne by the requesting party. BE IT ALSO KNOWN that the text and maps so certified by the Weld County Planning Commission may be examined in the office of the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners, located in the Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Third Floor, Greeley, Colorado. APPLICANT DOCKET N0. 90-27 Joy A. Jefferson 35 Martin Lane Englewood, Colorado 130110 DATE: July 25, 1990 TIME: 10:00 A.M. REQUEST: Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit - Livestock confinement operation (1,500 cattle) , horse boarding and training facility (150 head) , and tack and feed store LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the SE} of Section 32, Township 7 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: West of State Highway 257, north of Weld County Road 747 adjacent to the Town of Windsor BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO BY: DONALD D. WARDEN CLERK TO THE BOARD BY: Shelly Miller, Deputy DATED: July 2, 1990 PUBLISHED: July 12, 1990, in The New News C',r,%; - ^ .) „Ib %f F IIII t C;(sLiPd;y Qr.; WILL..:) : c:wr., c-, '4(1,•('';'..1,y ;',V4' r.,..•[...,r rclbl., shot: _ in .( ...•".u7[; t in Cot_:.,� r.y anC. '..�4�9.12r;1 _ . - �L.,.A ', hot- .,.,i.;:. ric:'Ws,;.t ca; hill"; c, .. }fUn \it (_ .! Lulnt: ill - v..,, N� '1 o,.-Ili County_� ✓ ` �e law d fee rime i bt I r c-.cn t..0 , _tn C. .tonarre' ��k ad Weld il' tt '.i I [ of rt. et the H"'i. L X 11 :iL 1 , i (D L: C'^ il,l chri �tim never.�.`^..(n�Ofa", inNY 4;.: more Otteenotaii in the Wile. Me��. PefmLL � 7T i 't .( r 1 W ,i 1 J(?. PLD and an I C*K (::r W n C mi n n o ilC, �maowudnt,ed t0.�and may be :t 01 r u i3 r c r ( -;,c t] t"" iMOWW� Arm= w t c .1 ' : c ' c c d i ' -c' „A AC .L..�r.aa'o[r "alter iecrd r,[ 't l ,:u ( ' v L l � cn f -, "� '1 l , wpm ymp 1.ate* t a*[arup tr,[( t (- , hi.:h-c.)'-.0 cJ I- �: 1 t�-i!:� - 0 R�.N be�writing O )'1 C.'n . d,wttb ee lgo at lean nee date trier to Us M.r1oe. The cat d v g ,,:-1r; r " lir it ;r'iri t 0 c ,lawro WotIstwutn rnek be lACI 11n'l th. Wpty tear Wald eiwin ndi1se�CcmmlWan may be eaamined in the diet el IA the c v h t t T:'. c l L ., c r r c CA/[ v elk Centennial Center, - �� i VW-106 Mind Flow, ' rt)1. I snit t ,..4 h .:1 7.cr, .[1l • tate.A. Wo 30 110 - :.-1 tpp pinch--;'(_ ho r:-,0-, +(7,: tt " ! . .Yulr 23.1100 - , - Sife i- 7l IJ t� -.lit. 1 ]{' o,. ,.t !; 44 Permit amd -- ;)`C I .a.1... IN .t C 1 ��ttff11pp5 Verrlao % rt..u�a�tYyg flirt; I M, and te 357 .moth -e�''Weld riFiClUPTION: Part of 1 ' ry t l I - ..._ 9O, Tmwm d� 'It: !Naant t►e _.. . Or ' b. » MMG�•'P aid in• New News July _...ieernrc4._../ eb,L ...._..._._..._•__. him-I•..,iry „,,,,,,,,: "^y Comm;...,tIrr'n cr .',7 ;.;'-17C,7J-/S-91 SC 0623 /990da:/�a 4,1 In. ), ,, aDs " of Windt gap, "° oP 4�1, �� or. a yF oil:. e` • ii. le • µlT' 1 301 WALNUT • WINDSOR, COLORADO 80550 P * TELEPHONE: (303) 686-7476 August 8, 1990 Ms. Lanell J. Curry Current Planner weld County Department of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 RE: CASE NUMBER Amended USR-735 Dear Lanell: The Windsor Planning Commission, upon hearing additional testimony at the August 2, 1990 meeting, recommended in a 6 to 1 vote that the recommendation of approval for Jefferson Farms be reversed to a recommendation of denial. I have - attached the section of the unofficial minutes which pertain to this issue (Planning Commission will consider formal approval of the minutes at their September 6th meeting) . I will also forward copies to Joy Jefferson. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, TOWN OF WINDSOR I Janet E. Lat r p Planner j el It AUG a t),0U I'=,__ ---- - GXhib* I' • • f< )6P WINDSOR PLANNING COMMISSION 100. „Ric AUGUST 2, 1990 re The Windsor Planning Commission, Regular Session, was called to order on August 2, 1990, at 7:03 P.M. by Chairman, Bob Frank. Members present were Wayne Miller, David VonBramer, Jim Cook, Scott Stevens, David Schmidt, and Gale Schick. Present from staff was Janet Lathrop. PUBLIC INVITED TO BE HEARD. Robert Ehrlich, representing Amigo Farms came forth with a request that the Planning Commission reconsider their decision concerning a weld County Referral - Use by Special Review - west of State Highway 257, North of weld County Road 74, Adjacent to the Town of Windsor - Joy A. Jefferson. This referral was originally heard on May 3, 1990, at which time neither Mr. Ehrlich nor his partners had knowledge of. Mr. Ehrlich was surprised to hear at the weld County Planning Commission meeting that Windsor had heard and made a positive recommendation. He said he did not give approval of a feed lot operation to the Jeffersons. Mr. Ehrlich is asking for a better understanding from this Board as to what occurred in may and a chance to explain Amigo Farms' position on this matter. Mr. Ehrlich began by stating that a feed lot just doesn't mix with people. He said originally, the Jefferson's requested a horse boarding operation, which he and his partners felt could be compatible. Mr. Ehrlich stated that as far as he was concerned, development has already started because there have been prospective buyers looking at this property for development. Mr. Ehrlich informed the Board that the Weld County Planning Commission has recommended denial of the request for Use By Special Review, but it must still come before the Commissioners. He said he was a member of the Planning Commission for Weld County and he has some concern that Windsor's referral will sway the Commissioner' s vote. Janet Lathrop read the referral recommendation that was sent to Weld County. She stated it is her understanding that the document she mails to weld County is included in the packet that is sent before the Commissioners. Ms. Lathrop said she spoke with Lanell Curry from the Weld County Planning Department earlier in the day and was told that if there is any further comment concerning Jefferson Farms from Windsor's Planning Commission, it must be directed to the Commissioners before August 29, 1990. Mayor Miller re-stated his position from May in that he felt a feed lot is not appropriate in that area and he would like the Planning Commission to reconsider their decision. He questioned why Amigo Farms wasn't notified of the May meeting. • • vroo PI) WINDSOR PLANNING COMMISSION LY AUGUST 2, 1990 45( Ms. Lathrop explained that Weld County sends the information to Windsor as a referral only, and that depending on the procedure, adjacent land owners may not be included in the packet. Windsor ordinance does not require notification of adjacent land owners for county referrals. Also, she said that often times she receives referrals just hours before a meeting with the Planning Commission. In order to make the County deadlines for referral response, there is no time for such notification. Mr. Ehrlich re-stated that there is no problem with the horse operation and that Mr. Jefferson hasn't been denied any of the original agreement. Manuel Pineda, 35065 Weld County Road 19, Windsor, Colorado stated he wrote a letter to the Weld County Commissioners and to the Weld County Planning Department with a request to deny the Use by Special Review. He stated the Jeffersons have been in violation of county zoning regulations since October, 1989. The original agreement was for 40 head of cattle. Now there are over 1000 head. He further stated that Jefferson Farms is not a typical family farm as Mr. Jefferson doesn't own the cattle. The surrounding area already has three subdivisions and there are five homes just across the road from the feed lot. He said the runoff from the feed lot goes East of County Road 74 into the Thompson Lake. There is no lagoon for runoff to go into therefore it will be going into the irrigation supply. Mayor Miller made a motion to place the RECONSIDERATION OF A WELD COUNTY REFERRAL - USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW - WEST OF STATE HIGHWAY 257, NORTH OF WELD COUNTY ROAD 74, ADJACENT TO THE TOWN OF WINDSOR - JOY A. JEFFERSON on the August 2, 1990 Planning Commission agenda as item number l0-A_ Gale Schick seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. RECONSIDERATION OF A RECOMMENDATION TO WELD COUNTY CONCERNING REFERRAL OF A USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW - WEST OF STATE HIGHWAY 257, NORTH OF WELD COUNTY ROAD 74, ADJACENT TO THE TOWN OF wiNDSOR, JOY A. JEFFERSON Bob Ehrlich, representative of Amigo Farms, Inc. , again stated their desire for this Planning Commission to reconsider a recommendation made in May of this year concerning Joy A. Jefferson and the Weld County referral o£ Use by Special Review. He stated the area is ripe for development and that a Woodward Governor type of industry has been looking at the land. He feels that having a feed lot there is deterring the sale of the land. Mr. Ehrlich said the Commissioners may lean heavily toward approval of the Use by Special Review based upon Windsor Planning Commission' s approval. r( 0 -^ - 2 • • �� off° WINDSOR PLANNING COMMISSION ' AUGUST 2, 1990 N6( Jim Cook agreed with many of the comments made by Mr. Ehrlich, and added that he didn't feel the Jefferson misrepresented the situation in May. Mr. Cook added that because the development of the land is still years down the road, he still feels that approval with stipulations is appropriate. Robert Ehrlich said there is no place to pump the water from the feed lot and there is no lagoon on the land, therefore making the smell very strong. Janet Lathrop stated that there are County agencies such as the Health Department which have regulations to control the smell and waste. Robert Ehrlich said that is true, and that by the time Mr. Jefferson would get the money to conform to all the rules, it would be too late to clean up the mess and the damage would exist. Robert Frank said he is supportive of Mr. Ehrlich's concerns, and the selling point in may was that Mr. Jefferson's feed lot was only temporary. He feels that in light of the new testimony a re-hearing of Jefferson Farms is in order. Jim Cook asked if the Jeffersons should be notified before voting on the reconsideration. He felt it bothersome that Weld County doesn't notify adjacent land owners of special requests. Janet Lathrop informed the Commission that the County does not know when the windsor Planning Commission will hear the matter. A county Use by Special Review is basically the same procedure as a Windsor Conditional Use Grant. The governmental agency issues permission to continue a use but still remains in control by monitoring and enforcing what ever special conditions have been imposed. As with the Town, notification of adjacent property owners as to all of the hearing dates is not required by the regulations. The Town of Windsor is a referral agency only and not a hearing authority. Mayor Miller made a motion to recommend to the Weld County Commissioners denial of the Jefferson Farms special use permit and site specific development plan based on the new evidence provided at this meeting. Gale Schick seconded the motion. Roll call resulted as follows: Ayes: Frank, Miller, Schick, Schmidt, Stevens, vonSramer Nayes: Cook Absent: None Abstain: None 3 ✓CCESOn • • 1,0b. WINDSOR PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 2, 1990 OUf David Schmidt stated that he is bothered that the Planning Commission changes its decisions. We should examine ways to be able to have evidence presented by both parties when the issue is on the Planning Commission agenda. It was Bob Frank's opinion that the Windsor Land Use Map should be a policy making tool and followed with each application. Jim Cook stated that he is not in favor of the original decision's reversal because he feels that the Jeffersons should be present to give their side of the issue. He stated that if one decision was made based on a lack of adequate information, this decision may be doing the same thing. 4 • • i OFFICE OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Pfloaa(303)3564000.EST. 4200 P.O. 8oX 758 Smarr.Col onoo 80632 • COLORADO August 2O, 199O Secretary of State Board of County Commissioners 1560 Broadway 915 Tenth Street Denver, CO 8O2O2 Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Board and Secretary of State: Pursuant to C.R.S. , 524-18-109(3) (b) and 524-18-11O, this constitutes disclosure of an action which may have the appearance of impinging on my official duty and fiduciary trust. Currently pending before the Board of County Commissioners is a zoning application for a Use by Special Review for Toy Jefferson. The Jefferson interests are represented by R. Russell Anson, attorney-at-law, who is currently weld County Republican Chairman. I am a Republican candidate for office in the coming general election. Mr. Anson, as party Chairman, chairs the 26 person executive committee which makes decisions regarding such matters as funding for campaigns. No financial contribution by the Republican party towards my campaign has been made. Furthermore, Section 24-18-104(3) (a) , specifically excludes accepting reported campaign contributions from the category of acts which constitutes a breach of fiduciary duty. The local party does publish, at their cost, a brochure containing information regarding all Republican party candidates. The possible appearance of conflict may also involve non-financial considerations in that Mr. Anson, as party Chairman,. and a former employee of the County (having resigned in 1984) , might be claimed to unduly influence this Board's decision. I an not in a position to refrain from voting on the Use by Special Review as a quorum will not be available should both Commissioners in this position abstain. As a result, I will be participating in the voting. I should also note that ? have consulted with Assistant County Attorney Lee Morrison, who concurs with my view that these circumstances do not constitute a breach of the public duty with respect to the Use by Special Review process, pursuant to C.R.S. , 524-18-101, et seq. , Colorado Code of Ethics or the weld County Home Rule Charter. Nonetheless, disclosure is given and a request made that an advisory opinion issue from your office concerning this matter. Sincerely, Z �� Constance L. Harbert .°iCO yOn weld County Commissioner OFFICE • OFOF BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ritPHOnt(303)356-4000,.eft,6200 C)11 ma Box 738 lige GREELef, CoLomoo_80632, COLORADO August 20, 1990 Secretary of State Board of County Commissioners 1560 Broadway 925 Tenth Street Denver, CO 80202 Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Hoard and Secretary of State: Pursuant to C.R.S., 624-18-109(3) (b) and 524-18-110, this constitutes disclosure of an action which may have the appearance of impinging on my official duty and fiduciary trust. Currently pending before the Board of County Commissioners is a zoning application for a Use by Special Review for Joy Jefferson. The Jefferson interests are represented by R. Russell Anson, attorney-at-law, who is currently Weld County Republican Chairman. I am a Republican candidate for office in the coming general election. Mr. Anson, as party Chairman, chairs the 26 person executive committee which makes decisions regarding such matters as funding for campaigns. No financial contribution by the Republican party towards my campaign has been made. Furthermore, Section 24-18-104(3) (a) , specifically excludes accepting reported campaign contributions from the category of acts which constitutes a breach of fiduciary duty. The local party does publish, at their cost, a brochure containing information regarding all Republican party candidates. The possible appearance of conflict may also involve non-financial considerations in that Mr. Anson, as party Chairman,, and a former employee of the County (having resigned in 1984) , might be claimed to unduly influence this Board's decision. I am• not in a position to refrain from voting on the Use by Special Review as a quorum will not be available should both Commissioners in this position abstain. As a result, I will be participating in the voting. I should also note that I have consulted with Assistant County Attorney Lee Morrison, who concurs with my view that these circumstances do not constitute a breach of the public duty with respect to the Use by Special Review process, pursuant to C.R.S. , 524-18-101, et seq. , Colorado Code of Ethics or the Weld County Home Rule Charter. Nonetheless, disclosure is given and a request made that an advisory opinion issue from your office concerning this matter. Sincerely, SIK ~ Gene R. Brantnernr7 weld County Commissioner �� II WELD COUNTY • R. RUSSELL ANSON CO : '1 5;^ IFS ATTORNEY AT LAW 1M JUL 16 12 J:= 51 THE LAW BUILDING 1011 11TH AVENUE C P.O. BOX 326 CLERK , COLORADO 80632 TO THE BOARD GREELEY .lr (303)3534508 TELECOPIER:(303)356-1111 July 16, 1990 Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners P. O. Box 758 Greeley, CO 80632 Re: Amended USR-735, Scott and Joy Jefferson Dear Clerk to the Board o£ County Commissioners: The undersigned has been retained to represent the Jeffersons concerning the amended USR-73S that is presently scheduled to be heard before the Board of County Commissioners on July 25, 1990. Request is herein made that the hearing be continued to another date preferably August 2i7 1990. The reason for our request is that Mr. Jefferson recently retained me and I am unable to appear on the July 25 date as 1 will be out of the state during that week. Thank you ery much for your consideration in this matter. Very 1 rs, 1� s 11 Anson Attorney at Law RRA:yd pc: Scott Jefferson SC C ?3 Ex h; b+a, ee : Pi. • • DATE: July 2, 1990 TO: The Board of County Commissioners Weld County, Colorado FROM: Clerk to the Board Office Commissioners: If you have no objections, we have tentatively set the following hearing for the 25th day of July, 1990, at 10:00 A.M. Docket No. 90-27 - Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit for a livestock confinement operation (1 ,500 cattle) , horse boarding and training facility (150 head) , and tack and feed store - Joy A. Jefferson OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD BY: a .Q Pl ar k, MADeputy The above mentioned hearing date and hearing time may be scheduled on the agenda as stated above. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD OUNTY, C�OLOjtYLYkr✓ no- 4Cili/Mill • • OFFICE OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PHerIE(303)356 x000. Err.4200 P.O.. Box 758 758 GREELEY.C0WRADo 80632 y C C0L0RAD0 O O� (,7r V T� ja7" a .,n t3r? June 11, 1990 - _ a N ) w L.) Joy A. Jefferson 35 Martin Lane Englewood, Colorado 80110 Dear Ms. Jefferson: Your application for a Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit has been recommended unfavorably to the Board of County Commissioners by the Planning Commission. The legal description of the property involved is shown as part of the SE3 of Section 32, Township 7 North, Range 67 west of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. If you wish to be heard by the Board of County Commissioners, it will be necessary for you to indicate your request by signing the bottom of this letter and returning it to this office. Regular hearing procedures will then be followed. This includes publishing a Notice of Hearing in the legal newspaper, an expense to be paid by you. In order to proceed as quickly as possible, we must receive your reply by June 25, 1990. If we are not in receipt of your request by that date, the matter will be considered closed. Sincerely, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO N�RJ g11/71;4) CHAIRMAN I wish to have a hearing on this matter brought before the Board of County Commissioners. I agree to pay for the legal advertising expense. / e ' ✓�`.,...� ea 1-6 G ov �ie�. cit/ f a � � OFFICE OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PHONE(303)5564000. Err.42O0 P.O..Box 758 758 GREEL,EY, COLORADO 80652 COLORADO June 11, 1990 Joy A. Jefferson 35 Martin Lane Englewood, Colorado 8O11O Dear Ms. Jefferson: Your application for a Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit has been recommended unfavorably to the Board of County Commissioners by the Planning Commission. The legal description of the property involved is shown as part of the SE} of Section 32, Township 7 North, Range 67 west of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. If you wish to be heard by the Board of County Commissioners, it will be necessary for you to indicate your request by signing the bottom of this letter and returning it to this office. Regular hearing procedures will then be followed. This includes publishing a Notice of Hearing in the legal newspaper, an expense to be paid by you. Xn order to proceed as quickly as possible, we must receive your reply by June 25, 199O. If we arc not in receipt of your request by that date, the matter will be considered closed. Sincerely, • BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COU NTY, COLORADO CHAIRMAN I wish to have a hearing on this matter brought before the Board of County Commissioners. I agree to pay for the legal advertising expense. 5 C 0F,7 y . • _ ._ :.6_ � I31! x © . , § : Ali R ! » ^ � � � k §\ kk � 4• t '.. ` ! | \� & , , /c§ ' - -a ;f zo . 0 �fI {0 � . kf ; / aen - e : 0 . 2 . § � / � + tE . � ! ! $ !« v . _ ! « . k ,�; ® * �■E ! . a | VI § ( ' � ! p; = e ' l k;\§ � 1t6; i . { � k \ k " / \ ; F2;/.1.,..2 2 � § � z ., \ \s ! ' §� � . | . 7 ; z2/ 3, [§ ' 4 k . } j% � i . (e ( « . . , § !\ ! -€P 2 ` \ 2 . @! o . { : @q / � } e ° ) ? ems- - e) y�»}xr. 2 _2 i , ____ if. - , . . re t i to t h C ru §/ 22 Co, r O/ § 0 ! \ \ Li (/ . q 2/ ;4o ! r t { 2 � ill (Xt \/ � ( \ 7 \ ,i !- G tu ` •i§ § / $ } / � a - / \in § _._rte_i� • • Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission June 5, 1990 Page 2 The Chairman asked the applicants if they had reviewed the recommendation of the Department of Planning Services' staff. They had not and the Chairman allowed them time to do so. They expressed concerns regarding Condition 2, item 3. The houses and the mobile home. to his knowledge, have always been a source of income, and they would like to continue renting. However. in order so take advantage of this year's season they would like the Special Use permit acted on today, and if it is approved by the Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners they will come back for an amendment to rent out the dwellings. The Chairman asked Keith to read the recommendation of the Department of Planning Services' staff into the record. MOTION: Jerry Kiefer moved Case Number USR-878 for Daniel Ochsner and Barry Payant for a Sits Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a recreation facility be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with the Planning Commission's recommendation for approval based upon the recommendation presented by the Department of Planning Services' staff and the testimony of the applicant. Motion seconded by Rick Iverson. The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Planning Commission. Discussion followed. The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Bud Halldorson - yes; Judy Yamaguchi - yes; Rick Iverson - yes; - Bud Clemons - yes; Jerry Kiefer - yes; Ernie . Ross - yea. Motion carried unanimously. CASE NUMBER: Amended OSR-735 APPLICANT: Joy A. Jefferson REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and Amended Special Review permit for a livestock confinement operation (1,500 cattle) , horse boarding and training facility (150 head). and tack and feed store. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the SE} of Section 32. T7N, R67W of the 6th P.M.. Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: West of Highway 257, north of Weld County Road 74; adjacent to the Town of Windsor. APPEARANCE: Scott Jefferson represented the applicant. He stated he manages and operates this farm for his mother. They want to build up the property to nC(Y;?i5 h , b�-� e s s Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission June 5. 1990 Page 3 include the uses stated in the application materials. This was a feedlot for 4,500 head of cattle prior to their ownership. They have only roods for 1.500 head, and they will abandon this operation as soon as the surrounding properties are being developed. They are surrounded by the Town of Windsor on the south, north, and east sides. • Lanell Curry reviewed the history of this request. The 'property is currently in violation. The original permit, approved in March 1986. allowed for 60 head of horses. A Show Cause Hearing was held and this application is a result of the Board's resolution. The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the audience. Bob Ehrlich. Amigo Farms, stated they were not notified of a ramping Commission meeting at the Tow of Windsor. A statement was made at this meeting that they are not opposed to this request. That is not true. They are against it because they have started to develop the adjacent land and currant uses reflect on Altars uses. A flag pole annexation vas performed by the Town of Windsor to incorporate the adjacent property. Thu are not against the origizuel permit. but they are against the feedlot operation. They have no animosities. This is just a business decision. and they have already stated development in the area. Craig Harrison. Resource Corporation, owns property adjacent to this property. Ha also is against the feedlot for cattle. Tape 374 Larry Archer, adjacent property owner, stated he operates a dairy farm on . his property. He is not opposed to this use and feels it is reasonable request_ The Chairman asked Lanai' Curry to read the County Commissioner's Show Cause Resolution into the record. Scott Jefferson stated he could understand the concerns of the neighbors. but the land is still being farmed and they would be allowed 80 horses as a usa by right in the Agricultural zone district. They would be willing to discontinua the feedlot as soon as ground is broken for development on adjacent properties. The Chairman asked Lanett Curry to read the recommendation of the Department of Planning Services' staff into the record. The staff's recommendation vas for denial. en ^nom 41 • Summary of the Wald County Planning Commission June S, 1990 Page 4 MOTION: Jerry Kiefer moved Casa Number Amended DSR-735 for Joy A. Jefferson for a Site Specific Development Plan and an amended Spacial Review permit for a livestock confinement operation for 1,500 cattle. a horse boarding and training facility for 150 head. and a tack and feed store be• forvardsd to the Board of County Commissioners with the Planning 'Commission's recommendation denial based upon the recommendation of the Department of Planning Services' staff and the testimony heard by the Planning Commission. - Motion seconded by Judy Yamaguchi. The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Planning Commission. Discussion followed. The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Bud Halidorson - no; Judy Yamaguchi - yes; Rick Iverson - no; - Bud Clemons - yes; Jerry Kiefer - yes; Ernie Ross - yes. Motion carried vith four voting for the motion sad two voting r : against the motion. The Chairman dismissed the meeting for lunch at 11:38 a.m. The Chairman reconvened the meeting at 1:30 p.m. NOTICE: Lean Raid. Planning Commission Malabar and Rod Allison, Principal Planner are now present. CASE NUMBER: USR-911 APPLICANT: Stevan H. and Kim M. Nilson REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for an Agricultural Service Establishment (Tractor and Farm Implement Sales and Service Facility) in the A (Agricultural) zone district. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the E} SE} of Section 6, T2N, R66W of the 6th P.K., Wald County, Colorado LOCATION: Approximately 2 miles south of the Town of Platteville; oast of Weld County Road 25-1/2, south of Wald County Road 26. APPEARANCE: Fred Otis, Attorney at Lev, represented the applicant. Mr. and Mrs. Nelson wish to put in a farm implement and repair facility. To begin with, they will not employ any additional people. They are currently operating their business in Boulder County, but they vent to relocated to Southern Weld County. This property is as abandoned gravel mina and they have addressed all required concerns in applying for this Special Use permit. Their plans will enhance the property. Most of their customers are "hobby" farmers with small tracts. ca r .CiuF'�..a WELD COUNTY COMNI!SSIOAERS BEFORE THE WELD COUNTY. COLORADO. PLANNIN99961,ISSIONPI! S 9' RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY TC0t1.'� !SSSISOrNERS Moved by Jerry Kiefer that the following resolution b�eT�tnttroduced for passage by the Weld County Planning Commission. Be it Resolved by the Weld County Planning Commission that the application £or: CASE NUMBER: Amended USR-735 NAME: Joy A. Jefferson ADDRESS: 35 Martin Lane, Englewood, CO 80110 REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a livestock confinement operation (1,500 cattle), horse boarding and training facility (150 head) , and tack and feed store. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the SE} of Section 32, T7N, R67W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: West of State Highway 257, north of Weld County Road 74; adjacent to the Town of Windsor. be recommended unfavorably to the Board of County Commissioners for the following reasons: It is the opinion of the Weld County Planning Commission that the applicant has not shown compliance with Section 24.3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: The applicant has not demonstrated that the proposal is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. The use proposed is within the urban growth boundary of the Town of Windsor and is a 20.5 acre agriculturally zoned parcel surrounded by the Town of Windsor on three sides. The applicant has not shown how the proposed use will be consistent with the urban-type uses planned for the adjacent properties. - The proposal is not consistent with the intent of the district in which the use is located. Areas for the conduct of Uses by Special Review are provided in the Agricultural zone for uses which have been determined to be more intense or to have a potentially greater impact than Uses Allowed by Right. The • location of this parcel, adjacent to the Town of Windsor, is noc suitable for the intensive type of operation proposed. • The proposed uses will not be compatible with the future development of the surrounding area as projected by the Windsor future land use plan. This parcel is surrounded by the Town of Windsor on the west. north, and east boundaries. The Town of Windsor properties are zoned Planned Unit Development (PUD). The PUD would allow industrial, commercial, and residential uses. The south boundary of the property is not in the Town of Windsor and is zoned Agricultural. However, the Town of Windsor has shown the property on its future land use map for commercial uses. The use &hib�+� occivr Joy A. Jefferson Amended USR-735 ° Page 2 of the property as a 1,500 head cattle livestock confinement operation and 150 head horse boarding and training facility will not be compatible with the projected future land uses of the Town of Windsor. - The applicant has not demonstrated that there is adequate provision for the protection of the health, safety and welfare of the inhabitants of the neighborhood and the County. Two surrounding property owners have expressed objections to the proposed use based on the intensity of the use and environmental concerns. Motion seconded by Judy Yamaguchi VOTE For Passage Against Passage Judy Yamaguchi Bud Halldorson Bud Clemons Rick Iverson Jerry Kiefer Ernie Ross The Chairman declared the resolution passed and ordered that a certified copy be forwarded with the file of this case to the Board of County Commissioners for further proceedings. CERTIFICATION OF COPY I, Bobbie Good, Recording Secretary of the Weld County Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution is a true copy of the Resolution of the Planning Commission of Weld County, Colorado, adopted on June 5, 1990, and recorded in Book No. XII of the proceedings of the Planning Commission. Dated the 7th day of June. 1990. 1 oAk Bobbie Good Secretary Car'nc9C. ,;/ „ J, ,'`�' INVEligifY OF ITEMS SUBMITTED FOR CONSIRATION Case Number Amended USR-735 !� Submitted or Prepared Prior to Hearing At Hearing 1. Application 9 Pages X 2. One application plat(s) 1 page(s) X 3. DPS Referral Summary Sheet X 4. DPS Recommendation X 5. DPS Surrounding Property Owner's Mailing List X 6. DPS Mineral Owner's Mailing List X 7. Three DPS Maps Prepared by Planning Technician X 8. DPS Notice of Hearing X 9. DPS Case File Summary Sheet X 10. DPS Field Check X 11. 5-14-90 referral from West Greeley Soil X Conservation District 12. 5-10-90 referral from Weld County Health Dept. X 13. 5-9-90 referral from Town of Windsor X 14. 5-7-90 referral from Department of Highways X 15. 5-8-90 referral from County Extension X 16. 5-2-90 referral from Windsor/Severance FPD X 17. 5-3-90 referral from Weld County Engineering X 18. 4-26-90 letter to applicant X 19. 5-26-90 letter of objection from Manuel Pineda X 20. 5-31-90 letter of objection from Robert E. X Ehrlich I hereby certify that the 20 items identified herein were submitted to the Department of Planning Services at or prior to the scheduled Planning Commission hearing. I further certify that these items were forwarded to the Clerk to the Board's office on June 8, 1990. sent Planner STATE OF COLORADO ) l/ COUNTY OF WELD ) SUBSCRTh AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS 1, — day of Cot, 1,O'rARy AL'y U :.� a\AA.s..\14.. ,. ,., - NOTARI\PUBLIC My Commission Expires My Co+r nseion ExPwrs deb. 13, 1993 ec efr. .7 Exh; b44 • • � EXHIBIT INVENTORY CONTROL SHEET Case /1J/ tp � 1 l/10/fl7 denje a • r Exhibit Submitted By Exhibit Description (4/8 A. piLitc stet so.,At toyzr bimi,osith Azthd_. Q p IDA B. pi,h .La irrh-lh um - Efixidatzno rs e0.(e_m_/n if/rid/14;A) (O,11c. aiAt.,tincry ;n3 attmcntnAJJ devu-st (pipe. %)pitenitt. orlyttsu iieei_g_d Ca E. Lam. 7 A F• -eleitiei et AelAge— `711724- 1 _O %o H. lAhAleiLVILxrn 8� I. �� 1 t0 1 � dA ceS; ctib- E* Faars u R. 3ice;tG r U L. Yiailiznr Ai ftiL "tip, 9'-,�^et 7 fi litiCt CPA/I/do' gpietr . ' 0. ,r 444(•_ (A CW,m410O iFr r p S d- Date: June 5, 1990 CASE NUMBER: Amended USR-735 NAME: Joy A. Jefferson ADDRESS: 35 Martin Lane. Englewood, CO 80110 REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a livestock confinement operation (1,500 cattle), horse boarding and training facility (150 head) , and tack and feed store. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the SE} of Section 32. T7N, R67W of the 6tb P.M. , Weld County. Colorado LOCATION: West of State Highway 257, north of Weld County Road 74; adjacent to the Town of Windsor. THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES' STAFF RECOMMENDS TEAT THIS REQUEST BE DENIED FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: It is the opinion of the Department of Planning Services' staff that the applicant has not shown compliance with Section 24.3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: - The applicant has not demonstrated that the proposal is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. The use proposed is within the urban growth boundary of the Town of Windsor and is a 20.5 agriculturally zoned parcel surrounded by the Town of Windsor on three sides. The applicant has not shown how the proposed use will be consistent with the urban-type uses planned for the adjacent properties. - The proposal is not consistent with the intent of the district in which the use is located. Areas for the conduct of Uses by Special Review are provided in the Agricultural zone for uses which have been determined to be more intense or to have a potentially greater impact than Uses Allowed by Right. The location of this parcel, adjacent to the Town of Windsor, is not suitable for the intensive type of operation proposed. - The proposed uses will not be compatible with the future development of the surrounding area as projected by the Windsor future land use plan. This parcel is surrounded by the Town of Windsor on the west, north, and east boundaries. The Town of Windsor properties are zoned Planned Unit Development (PUD). The PUD would allow industrial, commercial, and residential uses. The south boundary of the property is not in the Town of Windsor and is zoned Agricultural. However, the Town of Windsor has shown the property on its future land use map for commercial uses. The use o£ the property as a 1,500 head cattle livestock confinement operation and 150 head horse boarding and training facility will not be compatible with the projected future land uses of the Town of Windsor. SCOS23 • • EXHIBIT INVENTORY CONTROL SHEET Case /ASR —4,h4iin j ) ,4 . G Exhibit SubmittedBq Exhibit DescrIption - cols B. paA.A.Ln_.orirm_htilsacH,u pepiodatir)1 mu)Irnti>lien4/47,,;t) (0/1 c. A n t cnnV11-1X-AtIll V idelAC:Ad • , Ctj. 6 rpth ebilti L(26t&A) 19L0erne 7A E. ()dm 4 f2\ /">aaLck__. iViait.; eta Sth (4211-teAte. 7;2. litAjei ea AelAdt Wth , q 14, Illlp c• AAA lAi>Iznik alibi tit � cthat I n enuft:rta . 17g0 R• PM)!A14;IA arxn n :Se 4/k,A)10/'t /P,„,,i7vA, O} 1 &IA- 513. I. %%loll v 1k.)Adm)1 gettm 15 J. ce,,IC) c( (tfr ttt Y C : b b"An K. 6Ir "/ L. . re X k1 f11 ) /Alt °r-v27/1 -7 rep Vviltc, Shvve---- gleArt ,140- 0. 44n-± St CWimettizt $p„, . vfrkt s - 1 og,_ winhr. Ada() /�"i� S � Pa / . y r1 O4,O(,-- D os n _Th.., ,• Date: June 5, 1990 CASE NUMBER: Amended USR-735 NAME: Joy A. Jefferson ADDRESS: 35 Martin Lane, Englewood, CO 80110 REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a livestock confinement operation (1.500 cattle), horse boarding and training facility (150 head) , and tack and feed store. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the SE} of Section 32, T7N, R67W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: West of State Highway 257, north of Weld County Road 74; adjacent to the Town of Windsor. THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES' STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THIS REQUEST BE DENIED FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: It is the opinion of the Department of Planning Services' staff that the applicant has not shown compliance with Section 24.3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: - The applicant has not demonstrated that the proposal is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. The use proposed is within the urban growth boundary of the Town of Windsor and is a 20.5 agriculturally zoned parcel surrounded by the Town of Windsor on three aides. The applicant has not shown how the proposed use will be consistent with the urban-type uses planned for the adjacent properties. - The proposal is not consistent with the intent of the district in which the USIA is located. Areas for the conduct of Uses by Special Review are provided in the Agricultural zone for uses which have been determined to be more intense or to have a potentially greater impact than Uses Allowed by Right. The location of this parcel, adjacent to the Town of Windsor, is not suitable for the intensive type of operation proposed. - The proposed uses will not be compatible with the future development of the surrounding area as projected by the Windsor future land use plan. This parcel is surrounded by the Town of Windsor on the west, north. and east boundaries. The Town of Windsor properties are zoned Planned Unit Development (POD). The PUD would allow industrial, commercial, and residential uses. The south boundary of the property is not in the Town of Windsor and is zoned Agricultural. However, the Town of Windsor has shown the property on its future land use map for commercial uses. The use of the property as a 1,500 head cattle livestock confinement operation and 150 head horse boarding and training facility will not be compatible with the projected future land uses of the Town of Windsor. eCO5O'J' • • Joy A. Jefferson Amended USR-735 Page 2 - The applicant has not demonstrated that there is adequate provision for the protection of the health, safety and welfare of the inhabitants of the neighborhood and the County. Two surrounding property owners have expressed objections co the proposed use based on the intensity of the use and environmental concerns. vC0S93 �. • • ADDITIONAL COMMENTS AMENDED DSR-735 JOY A. JEFFERSON The Tow of Windsor Planning Commission recommended approval of this request at its May 3 regular meeting with the stipulation that the cattle feeding operation cease when development occurs on the annexed property adjacent to the site. aeCr.S173 . • ! 26 i:3j 1:7.. t I.1.+w..v JIB: J 1n:L'.r gall. 35065 .r..DD CC. RC550 DPg15-e7 20:_ i MAY 3 0 1990 _JCUDIY C/O .'is. Curry am 342 915 10th St. YkldCo. Plaooiq amista CDC. 80631 dU 4DCI: J.121 6CD'S (Jr_C.“ vnlS H1..kafl(i) 12 npril 193C TO e:0:i I :'ink C..C _ LnrISs Very briefly , we Pineda Farms would like to point out a few. facts and :cake some comments concerning; the Jefferson horse facility and cattle feed lot. Cur main farming operation is located in the crest 2 of Sec. 4 Twn 6 ans. 67. , or diagonally across to the south about 4 :Wile. P ir_eda Farms is very much opposed to the change of use as requested. -The Jefferson' s are not your "typical family farm operation". -They do not own the cattle that are being fed on the premises. The cattle are not owned by the persons feeding them. The cattle are owned by third parties wno are having their cattle "custom fed", or also known as "commercial feedia_ :The Jefferson' s originally had no intent in conducting a cattle feeding op- eration. Some of the facilities were taken down, dismantled, or sold. Inclu- ded were--feed bunks were removed , a cattle weighing scale was dismantled, feed and grain mixing and moving equipment was. also sold or taken down. -The existing feedlot still has capacity to feed a total of 2000 head of cattle. -Before and even now that the feedlot is back in operation the runoff from the the feedlot goes east along goad 74 and runs directly into the Thompson lake and reservoir which is owned and operated by the Windsor Reservoir and Canal Company. now is this eiviornmental concern going to be addressed by the Commissioners and other Weld County and Colorado state agencies? The feedlot does not have a lagoon for surface runoff. -The feedlot already borders the Windsor City limits on ; ivay RD 74. The feedlot will not be, and is not now compatible with the development now occurring in the immediate area or with future proposed development. The farm directly to the south has been sub-divided into 40 and 20 acre tracts, there are are two new building sites going up now. -The 16C acre farm that the feedlot is situated on now has been already sub- divided into 3 separate parcels. UC08°../3 • • 2 Je=fersOn ee lot -The fetslot was reported in violation about 3 months ago , it has been in violation a lot longer than that. (:lore than 6 months by my :erdon al obser- vation.) -we felt the Board was very lenient an: easy on the Jeffersonh. -The "Board caught us by surprise in asking us what the penalty for violation should be. Surely the Commissioners have i3uidlines to follow in cases like this. Something like a time limit to remove the cattle. (10 to 30 days and or a fire, $100.00 to ,1;0.00 a day maximum startin; around the time the violation was first noticed. That is a decision for the Cormissionera to make. i Please Make this letter available to all the Board members. I will answer questions regarding the statements I have made here prior to the next meeting. Thank you. Signed etider-44-7744 Manuel Pineda Pineda & Sons Farms Inc. • 2CC'S?3 • • May 31, 1990 Weld County Department of Planning Services Attention: Lanell J. Curry 915 10th Street - Room •342 Greeley, CO 80631 RE: Case Number - Amended USR - 735 Dear Lanett: Regarding the above captioned, please be advised that Amigo Farms, Inc. is opposed to the request outlined in this case. Amigo Farms, Inc. owns the land adjoining the applicantz parcel on the west, north and east. We do not believe that it is in the best interest of the county and the surrounding landowners to allow this type of enterprise. As you are aware, the applicants property is located in a transitional use area. Land that has historically been utilized for agricultural purposes is now being converted to other uses (primarily rural residential) . Commercial cattle feeding operations and residential development do not mix very well. Increased truck traffic and other types of vehicle flows, noise, insects and other pests, odor and the potential for environmental damage from pollution are associated with this type of enterprise. I believe it is imperative that the Weld County Department of Planning Services seriously consider this application and base their decision on the potential impact this type of operation will have on this part of the county. Thank you for your time and consideration. Since el 1)v -6 11\-rNjC7-% • ,.. ` u bert E. Ehrlich; Pre ent I JuN j mg Amigo Farms, Inc. ': chid Co- MaWM pc: File c:n✓c••-)3 • • LAND-USE APPLICATION SUMMARY SHEET Date: May 29, 19S0 CASE NUMBER: Amended USA-735 NAME: Joy A. Jefferson ADDRESS: 35 Martin Lane, Englewood, CO 80110 REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a livestock confinement operation (1,500 cattle), horse boarding and training facility (150 head), and tack and feed store. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Fart of the SE} of Section 32, T7N, R67W of the 6th P.M.. Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: West of Highway 257, north of Weld County Road 74; adjacent to the Town of Windsor. SIZE OF PARCEL: 20.5 Acres, POSSIBLE ISSUES SUMMARIZED FROM APPLICATION MATERIALS: The criteria for review of this proposal is listed in Section 24.3 0£ the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. The Department of Planning Services' staff has received specific recommendations from the State of Colorado, Division of Highways. Weld County Extension Office, Windsor-Severance Fire Protection District, Weld County Engineering Department, West Greeley Soil Conservation District, Weld County Health Department, and Town of Windsor. Copies of these referral responses have been included in this summary packet. The Town of Windsor has recommended conditional approval and has expressed concerns for the future development of the surrounding area. The Town of Windsor borders this site on the west, north, and east sides. One inquiry and two objections have been received from surrounding property owners. SCC-77 a I loc.. i ,q � r: �; I w I•s r�a� .• u ro a\ I • • n n • 1 . .••�. ! 1 w • 102.,. ar \ _ fY i .• n • n r .1, \:.• w 'i v. 1 . ,; , a 1 w f \ II ' :ea l�' t e , } . �� •• I �.,w./ � . •• i. CC .I ' [ •D ' t I 196.•. F f \ f \ 1 \ I i \ 94 • • I " . q• w 1, • .• Y •••••• :Pkee• al T.B N. 1 t 04' .• - '� \ \n n \I•��,p`y a• w Ig@ Io ' i 3 •a -1 ' F..t. �' n 0,:,..fI. ;1.so :9 •n n w I w I] n • n ` n • n $$.. .. I. 1 M . `�1\ X11�,• .• �I.p1..«, •• 1 GF Bs • • F w r 86. _ •:::::.71;. _ E••� •`, • Y\ � r•J • •, ! Imo.�• • .. ,1 I • • •• \ ` M • \\� 11 .• • •i•\ 82 •O.fIV/II lJ• .wl-,••: \ • I ��I :eat; ••_ I •li••2o•u� • .7.:•., I �• {• I 'v.•'• • 11 •�•. `)C': I•��( ll n II '.•• .• s�. Y,_. -- . :+•�f 80. TTN . nwnil .. / 1 I .rI \� �• 1 �" • ra a 'a•wt wi 1 \ . .. -• i • " ... •• �._• T' • �•j a. 76.... l• • • • ' : . � I T 1\_. •• _ • - • ._ •�: __SI • •' �. G •. \ \yI rA~'-I• Ir+ - • ••�ffslw.vw an " w•w• .♦rzNr• •- I •y� � /I. • • • 1 •el vest,. i• •f ••••• ��fal 61••86 ... 74..r• z`...1 .1.1... tV+ "77�;z . • .:Y• ., •1.• r '`� ♦ 1� « +.fir a �1 ' � ..• I •f I•r.. aw• 1, ter , _( ura+ 1j 72... _ nr• • e t j- t.. . a eb. • • • • • • ti • • • • • Ip • • a p• s � .I A. :• ?. r••�••• • - -• ./ - • .7�- :".�Ysj • 6.66• ._� j._ 1 a•: •. (•• :'•7 •_n: •• • 68 T•6N. •••• � t\ I. I. Sets •• . • • n "off •••••••• • • \�[�y,ri- I \,; . S _ . s ••'• .. aL.. i :c. •,�,� ♦ CCCCICI S • , • ,l ; . • •rr----1 ..„,;•• �•un..•R. . 5 r: P*-;:i z-' ' O •• :51: $ ��1 a .'. • dm•A• 1 •4 ••••. • .740P,•,,4* " Y •, • . Z %.. 1 64... • •••..w • ' _ w C 1 � _- ' ` S - - .• • • - J / /. to 1 1 ,,\\ I, r\. � :. L ��' w �� I . --- - 29 L Th' \ /' ._. • ' c \ / 1 \ '\ . , �\-----): 1 c.:1/41-Ntd SOS- , 77' � L1 m 1 �'c�� o1�� - � ;v\ 33 ��•.r Kit .r \�.e,r I • . �Jr —�� `� 1- • \, 1 Lake ,, `. . _• \ M ��.k4 `• ,, . j___- ri •-• :±5.7H I/ a , N <s h,�� /9,1 .+` \♦. • \ / \ i J ` / �hrrm — 1 . NN:" . ... \.,J1.4),e Canal S �''• — fvC . J j � �'25 (\ / R.68 W. R 67; 'WINDSOR/ e08 s8] 'd; _.._. wmOsoK nv • .. _,... .,,,, .v vw Y \ ti . - b" _ `1 5 1 1. 35 4q7 ♦ ., lS i .. �A> r a 4 �•. :icy,,,,,-.,.-• '. � i.1 A , .:y ,. a . x"1`1-�\ A) 9 Y " i rte...,,,. w.a..Lr . . 3' .r \ - ;, C r" .y. ��, ly S ll� �" 055,i,12 � •A s� > py r f i. ' T.,k� F //� A i. q ♦o/� �x tl V5 } J Y ' _ . ,, -L,• O re-4an7��,fpi� r " �'Iv 4,,,,:: }tf i MY ) 'y}x Y .. - t-1s.4 e� u - •"'" r x 5 `[ C w \ • , , � .. xy, _ - _ - w , - ... .. _ ._ I I ; • • FIELD CHECK FILING NUMBER: Amended USR-735 DATE OF INSPECTION: May 15, 1990 NAME: Joy A. Jefferson REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review Permit for a livestock confinement operation (1,500 cattle) horse boarding and training facility (150 head) and tack and feed store LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the SE} of Section 32. T7N, R67W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: West of State Highway 257, north of Weld County Road 74; adjacent to the Town of Windsor. LAND USE: N Agricultural production E Agricultural production, State Highway 257 S Agricultural production W Agricultural production ZONING: N City of Windsor - PUD (Industrial and Commercial) E City of Windsor — PUD (Industrial and Commercial) S A (Agricultural) W City of Windsor - PUD (Industrial and Commercial) NW City of Windsor - PDR (Residential and Neighborhood Commercial) within .5 miles COMMENTS: Access to the site is from Weld County Road 74, a paved County arterial. There are 3 signs next to Weld County Road 74. There are approximately 20 horses and 50 cows on the property. There are driveways through the pen areas. The property is relatively flat. The southeastern part of the property is used for feed storage. The rest of the property is as shown on the plat. By. n 11 J. Current Plan er SC 1+7?J • REFERRAL LIST illb NAME: Joy A. Jefferson CASE NUMBER: Amended USR-735 REFERRALS SENT: April 26, 1990 REFERRALS TO BE RECEIVED BY: May 10, 1990 COUNTY TOWNS and CITIES Attorney Ault X Health Department Brighton • X Extension Service �Dacono Emergency Management Office Eaton r-Sheriff's Office —'Erie ,, X Engineering `Evans Housing Authority Firestone Airport Authority '—Fort Lupton Building Inspection Frederick --------Carden City STATE Gilcrest Division of Water Resources Greeley Geological Survey Grover 'Department of Health —Hudson X Highway DepartmentJohnstown Historical Society ----Reenesburg Water Conservation Board Kersey -Oil and Gas Conservation Commission —'La Salle Lochbuie FIRE DISTRICTS —'Longmont Ault F-1 ' Mead Berthoud F-2 Milliken 'Brighton F-3 -'--New Raymer Dacono F-i9 Nunn ----Eaton---Eaton F-4 Platteville ----Fort—Fort Lupton F-5 —Severance -�Galeton F-6 „ X Windsor Hudson F-7 —Johnstown F-8 COUNTIES - -La Salle F-9 Adams ----Longmont F-10 Boulder --Milliken F-11 ----Lorimer Nunn F-12 Pawnee Platteville F-13 FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES Platte Valley F-14 US Army Corp of Engineers ----Poudre Valley F-15 USDA-APHIS Veterinary Service �Raymer Federal Aviation Administration Southeast Weld F-16 Federal Communication Commission e X Windsor/Severance F-17 �—Wiggins F-l8 - Western Hills F-20 SOIL CONSERVATION DISTRICTS —" Brighton OTHER Fort Collins Central Colo. Water Conservancy Dist. ✓ X Greeley P anhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. Longmont Tri-Area Planning Commission West Adams COMMISSION/BOARD MEMBER 'X Ernie Ross . CCO ' r - UNITED STATES . Soil IIIDEPARTMENT OF Conservation 4302 W. 9th St . Rd. AGRICULTURE Service Greeley, CO 80634 May 14, 1990 West Greeley Soil Conservation District Board of Supervisors P.O. Box 86 Greeley , CO 80632 Weld County Case Number : USR-735 Dear Board Members : I have reviewed the application for Joy A. Jefferson for a Site Development Plan and Special Review Permit for a livestock confinement operation ( 1 , 500 cattle ) , horse boarding and training facility ( 150 head ) , and tack and feed store . Soils are consistant with the planned activities. The application, however , doesn ' t include for review plans for animal waste facilities , sizing, drainage area , etc. No seeding species for grass and trees were included for review. All facilities are presently in place and no new facilities will be constructed . I recommend the Weld County Planning office require a waste water utilization plan which indicates sizing and capacities, with size and location of runoff and waste holding facility be filed as a part of the request . The plan should include the uses and how the runoff waters are to be disposed of and locations of discharge or application . This would help to determine the impact to surface and subsurface water quality . Without these particular plans , it ' s difficult to determine adequacy of designed or planned systems . Sincerely , Calrit*-4-1 D Ronald D. Miller " '� ��/ District Conservationist 144Y29199D 11 RDM:kee Weld Co. Mamie bamuww, • S._ C? e ts''‘r MEMORAilDUilit Wilk Weld County Planning May 10, 1990 To Osts Environmental Protection Services F1 1 COLORADO From Case Number: USR-735 Name: Jefferson, Joy A. Subject: Environmental Protection Services has reviewed this proposal and recommends for approval, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall remove, handle, and stockpile manure from the livestock confinement area in a manner that will prevent nuisance conditions. The manure piles shall not be allowed to exist or deteriorate to a condition that facilitates excessive odors, flies, or insect pests, or pollutant runoff. The manure storage site shall have a water-tight surface which does not permit seepage or percolation of manure pollutants into the ground. 2. The facility shall be incompliance with the Colorado Guidelines for Feedlot Runoff Containment, prior to final approval of the proposed use. 3. Waste oil, waste paints, stains, treatments, spent drug containers, empty livestock dip containers, anti-freeze, and other associated liquid and solid wastes, shall be stored and removed for final disposal in a manner that protects against surface and groundwater contamination. 4. Required Emissions Permit is obtained from the Air Pollution Control Division, Colorado Department of Health for fugitive dust. 5. No permanent disposal of wastes shall be permitted at this site. 6. An ISDS Evaluation on all existing septic systems will be necessary prior to issuing the required septic permits on the existing systems. 7. Wood shavings, saw dust, and waste materials shall be handled, stored, and disposed in a manner that controls fugitive dust, blowing debris, and other potential nuisance conditions. 8. Fugitive dust must be controlled on this site. 9. The Division requires that this facility provide an employees system. with toilets served by an approved septic se711)7 men I75?� system. 1�UJ((II��;.:�!L�)�� LMAY 1 5 1990 WP353/dgc 4`-;vAy�j �J *W C& Mmi ua¢ wmiman o p*..-. nb ` Of CWiniOry ,rte, . . . * UL) ,.,\z• �;�: eips , "4 . r 301 WALNUT • WINDSOR, COLORADO 80550 i }' TELEPHONE: (303) 686-7476 ti'�17 May 9, 1990 ms. Lanell Curry Current Planner Department of Planning Services 915 Tenth Street Greeley, CO 80631 RE: Amended USR-735 Dear Lanell: The Windsor Planning Commission, at their regular meeting May 3, 1990, considered the above mentioned Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review Permit. The Planning Commission recommends that the applications be approved with the stipulation that when development occurs on the annexed property adjacent to the site, the cattle feeding operation cease. Please let me know if you have any questions or comments. Sincerely, TOWN OF WINDSOR C._ ��Janet E°'1.. L a Op Assistant to the Administrator j el l Wrv5) �`CT*fil7----) SC.,F AI MAY 1 0 1990 Weld CO. Plaroiine ,.i nungu, DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS. • STATE OF COLORADO P.O. Box 850 Greeley,Colorado 80832-0850 b (303)353-7232 'S) May 7, 1990 Weld Co., S.H. 257 Joy Jefferson Site Spec. rev. Plan No. of WCR 74 W. of S.H. 257 DOH File 45100 Ms. Lanell J. Curry, Planner Department of Planning Services Weld County 915 Tenth Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Dear Ms. Curry: We have reviewed the application from Joy A. Jefferson, and we have the following comment. There will be no apparent impact to State Highway 257 caused by this development. No access permit will be necessary since access is to Weld County Road 74. The traffic generated from County Road 74 to State Highway 257 should have little impact. Thank you for the opportunity to review this proposal. Please contact me at 350-2163 if you have any questions. Very truly yours, DOUGLAS D. RAMES DISTRICT ENGINEER #.1J & � f64 Evan A. Hooper, r. Development/Access Coordinator EAH:smw cc: L.D. Yost R.G. Sherriff File: Hooper via Crier r c7W5- I 5)51):1-777W5- •1 efirS'':? 1�C MAY 9 1990 Weld to. Moat alaslIsuo° GEN rNLNCES 1111 � WEL�OUN7Y EXTENSION SERVICE ISLFl GROVE PARK ft &c GREELEY, CO 3061 cif �� PHONE(303)3:0400C u,..dow- l915 loth STREET GREELEY.COLORADO 80537 Wik CAE NUMBER Amended R- 5 COLORADO s ed US R-735 . April 26, 1990 TO WHOM 1T MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from Joy A. Jefferson for a Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a livestock confinement operation (1,500 cattle), horse boarding and training facility (150 head), and tack and feed store. The parcel of land is described as part of the SE; of Section 32, T7N, R67W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is west of State Highway 257, north of Weld County Road 74, adjacent to the Town of Windsor. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by May 10, 1990, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Lanell J. Curry, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. -C �� SLl 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this Seques (is/is not) compatible with the interests=of our IG'' town for the following reasons: = o AI � r...O /// iACil 3. // We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts withr) interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Please refer to the enclosed lett -. Sign • �/ Agency: ,�t��/fyt'w/ •--- Date: n —g — �D ask_p_,�� DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE(303)3564000,EXT.440) i915 10th STREET GREELEY.COLORADO 80831 k CASE h'DMBER Amended DSR-735. COLORADO April 26, 1990 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from Joy A. Jefferson for a Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a livestock confinement operation (1,500 cattle), horse boarding and training facility (150 head), and tack and feed store. The parcel of land is described as part of the SE; of Section 32, T7N, R67W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is west of State Highway 257, north of Weld County Road 74, adjacent to the Town of Windsor. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by May 10, 1990, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Lanai' J. Curry, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. tri t1/4.73) _ e, 2t r"I 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel thisgeguesX (is/is not) compatible with the interestsgofiou; .1 town for the following reasons: Ct M k l �7 J�4.5.6 3. X We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with rt--1 interests. t 1 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Pleas re x to he 66010964,sefr-f latter. �✓ y grteler Date: ¢1 — 70 SCOS'1J a • �� er, MEMORRnDUM Lanell Curry, Planning May 3, 1990 70 _Data COLORADO From Drew Scheltinga, County Engineer i- hn/Al Jefferson, USR-735 X� susoct. Weld County Road 74 is a major artery with an average daily traffic count of 3,200 vehicles. Undoubtedly, there will be major improvements to Road 74 at sometime in the future. I recommend the applicant be required to dedicate an additional 20' of right-of-way. Also, because of the amount of traffic on Road 74, and because of the public access proposed to this site. I recommend the multiple entrances onto Road 74 be consolidated to one access. DS/mw:prjeff cc: Commissioner Kirby _ Planning Referral File - Jefferson, USR-735 h y,__ �ri MAY 4 1990 ' I Weld CD. Dl wan �mutsua 4111.1 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE(303)356-4000.EXT.4400 91510th STREET GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 COLORADO NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Weld County Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, June 5, 1990. at 10:00 a.m. for the purpose of considering a Sire Specific Development Plan and an amended Special Review permit for the property described below. Approval o£ the request may create a vested property right pursuant to Colorado Law. APPLICANT: Joy A. Jefferson LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the SE} of Section 32, T7N, R67W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado TYPE AND INTENSITY OF PROPOSED USE: Livestock Confinement Operation (maximum 1,500 head cattle), horse boarding and training facility (maximum 150 head) , and feed and tack store LOCATION: Adjacent to the Town of Windsor; west of State Highway 257, north of Weld County Road 74 SIZE: 20.5 acres, more or less The public hearing will be held in the Weld County Commissioners' Hearing Room, First Floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley. Colorado. Comments or objections related to the above request should be submitted in writing to the Weld County Department of Planning Services, 915 Tenth Street, Room 342, Greeley, Colorado 80631, before the above date or presented at the public hearing on June 5, 1990. Copies of the application are available for public inspection in the Department of Planning Services. Room 342, Weld County Centennial Center. 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado 80631 — Phone — 356-4000, Extension 4400. Ernie Ross, Chairman Weld County Planning Commission To be published in the New News To be publishe ne (1 Lim b May 10, 1990 Received by: Q�Date: v (9 Ci S ,3 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING I hereby certify that I have placed a true and correct copy of the surrounding property owners and owners and lessees of minerals in accordance with the notification requirements of Weld County in the case DAmended USR-735 for Joy A. Jefferson in the United States Mail postage prepaid First Class Mail by postal card as addressed on the attached list. This 5 the day of May 1990. Thy tyk.,c. Qr-,A PLEASE NOTE CHANGE OF TIME T0: SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS OR OWNERS AND LESSEES OF MINERALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH WELD COUNTY'S NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS. The Weld County Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, June 5, 1990. at 10:00 a.m. in the County Commissioners' Hearing Room. first floor. Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street. Greeley, Colorado, concerning the request o£: CASE NUMBER: Amended USR-735 APPLICANT: Joy A. Jefferson REQUEST: Livestock Confinement Operation (maximum 1,500 heed cattle), horse boarding and training facility (maximum 150 head), and feed and tack store LEGAL: Part of the SE} of Section 32, T7N, R67W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Adjacent to the Town of Windsor; west of State Highway 257, north of Weld County Road 74 For more information call Lanell J. Curry, Current Planner. WELD COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES 915 10th Street - Room 342 Greeley, CO 80631 Phone 356-4000. Ext. 4400 CCS0a • • SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS Amended USR-735 Joy A. Jefferson Dennis M. and Bonita L. Stark 7511 Weld County Road 74 Windsor, CO 80550 James A. and JoAnn J. Ochaner 7422 Weld County Road 74 Windsor. CO 80550 Amigo Farms, Inc. 1200 Carousel, Suite 100 Windsor, CO 80550 Harrison Resource Corporation 769 Whalers Way Suite A-200 Fort Collins, CO 80526 Peter C. and Nancy D. Hyland 2515 Falcon Road Fort Collins, CO 80526 Kenneth J.and Margaret K. Hall 901 Sandy Cove Lane Fort Collins, CO 80525 Amigo Farms, Inc. P.O. Box 60 Milliken, CO 80543 AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS SURFACE ESTATE ' Application No. tSubject Property C) 7709 -32 00 C) ( . 3-2 SATE OF COLORADO ) ss. COUNTY OF WELD ) THE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn, states that to the best of his or her knowledge, the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names, addresses. and the corresponding Parcel Identification Number assigned by the Weld County Assessor of the owners o£ property (the surface estate) within 500 feet of the property which is the subject of the application, This list was compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor, an ownership update from a title or abstract company, derived from ' such records, or from the records of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. The list compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor shall have ' been assembled within 30 days of the application submission date. 91 0 ?..919PCI3v The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me this 19 day April , 19 90 , by Joy A. Jefferson WITNESS my hand and official seal. 1 My Commission expires: p T1e�a Notdry My Pabl ti� Co57,7::±. a,t;fres Sept 29, 1993 333 D'J.H,:ropden Englewood,Ca re&80110 1 • NAYIS OF OWNERS OF PROPERTY WITHIN 500 FEET ' Please print or type ADDRESS, TOWN/CITY, ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NAME STATE AND ZIP CODE IDENTIFICATION 0 Srerk. 1511 1•/ c 2 Wxr O-7o - 5,-ornra2.G IDe.vitv56r% 3 6"" 1 l L tat'44*m to gbsSo In1121-, c, tn.,-Le- ? 4 23 i,/cPt79 co7r+g--tri -ennp4S �4r"{5 fl- T in Arm J' {../dtc✓' CO- QO%/0 1 AM, A-0 Pe.v-»•'3 iy,e. m r 100 a7Fr -32-c, 34 V:v‘dsev Co. cc15Sa I —1 e i(.L1 Pan. i KG_ Lz c N@�K�J �..Te/on n7D S- 2- 3;5 if,i+ -Icsr ce_tizSe _ Havr :sme. Roso�rce carp 7n es CA/Act rit'C keray Q12n7-0 S-000dS6 IStn:re A -2.96 Ifro°ti:As co. Cb525 1. ' Hybx 44 d. 251S -0-0-lcoi Rd 03.57-0`_ 000055 p.a.-rt.,- C 3 N4rc y p 3.r cat<<'r` 5 Cc. QG 52E I ' Na!( 90/ SC"MJ,V C0Ve t-n rs�7-0 -OaCC 61 kr.nn th S 3t {her�nv k_ 0rrefl:,� CC_ �zs I 1 yc es9a AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS MINERALS AND/OR SUBSURFACE ' Application No. Subject Property 4 -704 37 Dunn "-sZ STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. COUNTY OF WELD ) THE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn, states that to the best of his or her knowledge, the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names ' and addresses of all mineral owners and lessees of minerals on or under the parcel of land which is the subject of the application as their names appear upon the records in the Reid County Clerk and Recorder's Office, from an ownership update from a. title or abstract company, or an attorney. far The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me this 19 day o£ April , 19 90 , By Joy a. Jefferson WITNESS my hand and official seal. My Commission expires: 1lyCerrsston Expires Sept29, 1993 333 W.Ha poen ' Englewood,Colorado 80110 1 tary P lic /9`_ • INTEREST OWNERS Minerals and/or Subsurface Amigo Farms Inc. P.O. Box 60 Millikin , Co. 80543 SCOSeZtS 1 ts0 ci( DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES pMONE003135sgOm.ern 4g4 ' 91510th STREET OREELEY,COLORADO 80831 • Ge COLORADO April 26, 1990 Mr. Michael Jefferson 35 Martin Lane Englewood, CO 80550 Subject: Amended USR-735 - Request for a Site Specific Development Plan and an amended Special Review permit for a livestock confinement operation (maximum 1,500 head cattle), a horse boarding and training facility (maximum 150 head), and a tack and feed store on a parcel of land described as part of the SEI of Section 32, T7N, R67W of the 6th P.M., Weld County. Colorado Dear Mr. Jefferson: Your application and related materials for the request described above are complete and in order at the present time. I have scheduled a meeting with the Weld County Planning Commission on Tuesday, June 5, 1990. at 1:30 p.m. This meeting will take place in the County Commissioners' Rearing Room, first floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Strut, Greeley, Colorado. It is recommended that you and/or a representative be in attendance to answer any questions the Planning Commission members might have with respect to your application. It is the policy of Weld County to refer an application of this nature to any town or municipality lying within three miles of the property in question or if the property under consideration is located within the comprehensive planning area of a town or municipality. Therefore, our office has forwarded a copy of the submitted materials to the Windsor Planning Commission for its review and comments. Please call Janet Lathrop at 686-7476 for further details regarding the date, time, and place of this meeting. It is recommended that you and/or a representative be in attendance at the Planning Commission Meeting to answer any questions the Commission members may have with respect to your application. It is the responsibility of an applicant to see that a sign is posted on the property under consideration at least 10 days preceding the hearing date. Sometime prior to May 20. 1990, you or a representative should call me to obtain a sign to be posted on the site no later than May 25, 1990. 5-a6-9d 1 Mr. Michael Jefferson April 26, 1990 Page 2 The Department of Planning Services' staff will make a recommendation concerning this application to the Weld County Planning Commission. It is the responsibility of the applicant to call the Department of Planning Services' office a few days before the date of the Planning Commission hearing to obtain that recommendation. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to call me. Respectfully, /� 4% 0 41-1-eat e Lanell J. Curry V ` Current Planner LJC:rjg OCCSO J ., .,„ ..y,%C On H it 30' n.m..fd dte t: the Spoiled Review ew STATE OF COLORADO ) ,A„, o rb`a s s . �'$ rr A;. � a COUNTY OF WELD ) ir did � ae� a�N:21, .d KAPaobr.doltr OP'Ys�11Y USE: tieeetrcY ,„ A,i-, ,i) (3. /..e „A.JCL i n g •• naining ca mel, mime boarding dully sworn, says th he/she is a Indere: wedciStateMOO' �' publisher of the New News, a weekly nda�Couee nty Road 7< the urj°�t a near," '' newspaper published in Keenesburg a. GP.a` cmp, , in said County and State; that said � R°°" Cen�• Wein .14 ry . newspaper has a general circulation � m.e4arTodey.� ` in said County and has been contin- "Omitted �Wad ously and uninterruptedly published � fir°n— therm during a period of at least tat atria data or a(.d fifty-two consecutive weeks prior • d.�eloinl • fi 'me :_ to the first publication of the ssaa -w�.�:yo�v�y��O..°��y" Wii°- annexed notice; that said newspaper �ssioseiwm "° GI. . p--Rm"°_e��.� is a newspaper within the meaning ,�. • W°°g',m _7Wi1.-._, of the act of the General Assembly i w��Mro •. of the State of Colorado, entitled Ebterww aussys,e"An Act to regulate the printing deoe U °y of legal notices and advertisements, " mew Vwe be7 and amendments thereto that the ioaao _ notice of which the annexed is a - _. w $,,T. printed copy taken from said news- paper, was published in said news-is paper, and in the regular and entire '4' issue of every number thereof, i'• once a week for t successive week(s) ; that said notice was so published in said newspaper proper y" and not in any supplement thereof, , and that the first publication of -0 said notice as aforsaid, was on r• the l0 day of n o,1 r t 4 19 CIO , and the last of the 16 M d f fro 9- 4,-e e r' Subscribed and sworn to before me this . 70 2% day of ;?tt j . �` r 19 `J'd •" ,,, F*`ici-•• 1p5giyTcw5--q11 JUN 1 1990 1 ;z Yield Co. %wpo w WomaiSap, v • 0 . STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. COUNTY OF WELD ) --4-6/j R. 9 17/6 ge?.ng dully sworn, say t t he/she is publisher of the N News, a weekly newspaper published in Keenesburg ' in said County and State; that said ti . newspaper has a general circulation in said County and has been contin- r' ously and uninterruptedly published therin during a period of at least fifty-two consecutive weeks prior R 1• J� r. to the first publication of the • m . annexed notice; that said newspaper ` is a newspaper within the meaning ""°°" right of the act of the General Assembly • 'Chown of the State of Colorado, entitled d C "An Act to regulate the printing atl„' to r.. w of legal notices and advertisements, " vt r and amendments thereto that the (' notice of which the annexed is a 'a° = y, printed copy taken from said news- . � A ti 3°srte paper, was published in said news- ptI muse d' via N paper, and in the regular and entire m-Wok—maw a10 a. issue of every number thereof , M a� s. ae ' <, °'o r once a week for successive .�^� F week( s) ; that said notice was so m w published in said newspaper proper sk'_,� to63 u t and not in any supplement thereof, m ao .y, e and that the first publication of A >°� � ,,. said notice as aforsaid, was or. '°'N° "CgmW�`"y vXL b A� the ___day of ,� ,x ,,l 4400. a 19 tip , and the last of the 3 d� of 199 0 1 %►: /� • /7-"794 — Subscribed and sworn o before me this ` . .5-t.--( day of 7h-te e 1916 ' i r 5,7957 irj :T. Oe-el e'," � JUN 1 1990 1t. I n -- _ - *14 to. Pbon Cmnmitoom `- r 411D "IP IIUSE BY SPECIAL REVIEW APPLICATION III Department of Planning Services. 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado 80631 Phone - 356-4000 - Ext. 4400 ' Case Number Date Received Application Checked by Mylar plat submitted Application Fee Ice? Receipt Number ll'..Vete) Recording Fee Receipt Number 1 ' TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT: (please print or type, except for necessary signature) I (we) , the undersigned, hereby request a hearing before the Weld County ' Planning Commission and Weld County Board of County Commissioners concerning the proposed Use by Special Review Permit on the following described unincorporated area of Weld County, Colorado: IILEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT AREA: rj F '/y section -32. T 7 N, R 67 W ll LEGAL DESCRIPTION of contiguous property owned upon which Special Review Permit is proposed: se At Section 3-.) T 7 N, R 67 W Property Address (if available) _ 765? 1 % e id cr,.M+r) Re d.-i'+ w:A sov S'9 Go.9b5 II PRESENT ZONE OVERLAY ZONES TOTAL ACREAGE "1.t), q PROPOSED LAND USE He.-Sc- x..,...0.3_ r...:..'ns,PA...yes/int KS p..,r croft./ 0.4( fat ' EXISTING LAND USE f-(erMc b+e.rtl.ng. sr,.,."j 1 SURFACE FEE (PROPERTY OWNERS) OF AREA PROPOSED FOR THE USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT: w IIName: To v At Tacoar5ot, Address: 4,c marYl� L. City !� weod Zip S,00!(6 Home Telephone # 78,-(34.aBusiness Telephone # ' Name: Address: City Zip Home Telephone # Business Telephone (( IlAPPLICANT OR AUTHORIZED AGENT (if different than above) : Name: rel cbo c, T sa,^rn II Address: >,g oles, TYA (..Nc City F_ (z .ord • Zip S (!�4 Home Telephone 11 7$(-(3V}Q Business Telephone # 64;-2,03-5 ' List the owner(s) and/or lessees of mineral rights on or under the subject properties of record. IIName: T . N z-404,....,4 Address: 35 Ma,,,.rh% LetKe City e Lietsoev.l Zip gar 0 Name: Il Address: City Zip I hereby depose and state under the penalties of perjury that all statements, proposals and/or plans submitted with or contained within the application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. COUNTY OF WELD ) STATE OF COLORADO ) 7 Sdhn�ure: or Authorized Agent ' Subscribed and sworn to before me this 19 da of April 179 90, X NOTARY UBLIC �,.-. r_ I ! ; .,,.., ..xoireS Sept 29,1993 ,, ,�,. My commission expires ;7',:i n;x;y?en SCOS,_ 7 Englewood,Colorado 80110 / 4111 USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW WELD COUNTY Department of planning Services ' Purpose of request: 1a. To continue boarding, training, and breeding horses with 150 head maximum during the breeding season, 60-80 head during the non-breeding season. b. To add to the operation a 150' x 300' indoor arena ' and stalls, along with a tack and feed shop. 2. Return part of the property to a feedlot with approx. 1500 head capacity . The cattle help finance the improvements ' of the horse boarding operation. 1 itA. The primary need for the cattle is to finance the im- provements of the property to make it an attractive and full service equine facility . The purpose for the facility is to be a part of, ,and service the growing equine industry in Northern Colorado. Secondary , the operation is presently bringing out-of-state money to the 'geld County area including our operation, local farmers from whom feed is purchased, farmer who feeds the ' 1 cattle and provides three jobs. Other businesses who benefit include veterinaryrservices, veterinary supply, auto parts, and restaurants. For example, during the month of March, the operation brought over $100,000. to 'Feld County and :':indoor areas. The property was purchased August 1984. Prior use had ' been a feedlot for approx. 4800 head of cattle. The property had not been used for several years and was in rundown con- dition. It had been separated from the surrounding agricul- tural' property. (ref: Recorded Extension No. 0705-32-4-RE-688) I The property is irregular in shape of approx. 20.5 acres. There are two wood frame houses, garage, large wood barn, 100,000 lb. scale, scale house, two metal storage sheds and misc. wooden buildings on the property. In the S.L, corner of the property there is a large concrete pad and mixing plant. The balance of the property , 15 acres, consists of large pens. The surrounding property is being used for agriculture right now, although it was annexed into the towr. of Windsor in 1985. It has been zoned as Planned Unit Development for ' Industrial and Commercial use. The nearest residence is approx. 600 ft. from our west property line, sotth and across 'r;CR. 74 approx. 800ft. , cast and across state highway 257 approx. 1 mile and north approx. 1/2 mile to existing building; The maximum number of users will be between 45-50 people. l' cr—T The number of employees will be 8-10 during the operating ' hours o£ 6:00 a.m. -8:00 p.m. . The water source is the N.N;.C.'r:.D. and there are three septic systems servicing this facility. SCOS?7 ' • gli I Access to the property is off W.C.R. 74, with daily use consisting of standard automobiles, pick-ups and horse trailers and feedtrucks. Approx. once every three months, one to twenty ' cattle trucks will be delivering or receiving cattle. Fire protection consists of existing water supply , fire extinguishers in each building, and the Windsor Fire Dept. I services the area. Manure from cattle will be piled in pens then taken to surrounding farms and spread on fields. The waste from horses ' is also stockpiled and spread on surrounding farms. If unable to get into fields, the piles will be moved to the farms in which manure is to be used. .Storm water retention facilities 1 associated with proposed use will be for contaminated water. This will be built at the south east corner of the property to specifications set by the environmental health department. All uncontaminated water from storm runoff is contained in II ditches along the south end of' property . All barren ground not driven on is being planted in a pasture grass and trees arc planded as time and money allow. I The existing facilities are already in operation and no extra construction is necessary for the cattle feeding operation. ' By using the existing facilities as they were designed, we believe we can upgrade the property to be an'.asset to the ' surrounding; area. The only addition would be a permanently located 150' x 300' indoor arena with stalls to be used by boarders, FFA members, 4-:= groups , and residents of North, ' ern Colorado. Statement on how the proposal is cinsistant with the 'weld County Comprehensive Plan: The property surrounding the west,north and east side of this property was annexed ' into lindsor in 1985 for industrial/commercial use and is presently used for agriculture. The tack and feed shop and : equine facility will help attract other commercial development ' to the area and still keep the rural community charm that Windsor has. The equine industry is on the rise and a top quality equine facility_in this area is now in demand. Thc ' I feeding of cattle will enable us to fill that need by upgrading the existing buildings and fences, adding an indoor arena and stalls, planting trees, paving roads, and purchasing needed equipment. The facility -for cattle was here before we pur-' . I chased the property , so no agricultural land will be taken out of production. The land to the south of us is zoned for agriculture and is still outside .city limits. Although I commercial cattlerfeeding and the tack and feed shop is consistant with the commercial zoning, we feel the proposed facility is a working part of agriculture as well. ' Concerning the protection of the health, safety, and welfare of the inhabitants of the neighborhood and county , By providing a safe and secure location for horse boarding I and a safe arena for riding and training, we arc insuring the safety and welfare for the area. Regarding the cattle oper- tion we will be subject to and follow the guidelines set by the i QC�Fr Environmental Health Agency, We hope we have addressed all the applicable +questions. Thank you for your consideration. ' Addition: When development begins on the surrounding property that has been annexed into Windsor, we ask that the terms of the cattle feeding Permit go before the county commisioners for review. As part of the horse boarding, we would also like to keep a maximum of 40 head of roping steers. . These will be confined to the existing pen east of our present arena. 1 1 i ;308'7 IAR1977630 Rec B 10ja REC 01977630 08/15/84 05 $3.00 1/001 Rec, F OS MARX ANN FEUERSTEIN CLE>� RECORDER WELD CO, CO THIS DEED, Made this 8th day of August Recorder's Stamp ' la 84,between INTRAWEST BANK OF GREELEY, N.A. a corporation duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws Colorado State Documentory Fee of the state of of the first part,and ppte -5 .... JOY A. JEFFERSON 35 Martin Lane, Englewood, Colorado 80110 $ 1,�.Q . of the said County of Arapahoe and gate of r Colorado of the second part: IWITNESSETH, That the said party of the first part,for and in consideration of the aura of ONE HUNDRED THIRTY THOUSAND AND NO/100 - - - (5130,000,00) DOLLARS, to the said party of the first part in band paid by the said part y of the second part,the receipt whereof is here- ' by confessed and acknowledged,bath granted,bargained, sold and conveyed, and by these presents doth grant,bar- gain,sell,convoy and confirm unto the said part y of the second part, her heirs, and assigns for- ever, all of the following described lot or parcel of land,situate,lying and being is the said County of Weld and State of Colorado,to wit: Lot "A" of Recorded Exemption No. 0705-32-4-RE688, according to the Map recorded II May 29, 1984 Sn Book 1031 under Reception No. 1968486, Weld County Records, being' a tract of land located in the Southeast Quarter (SE1/4). of Section Thirty-two (32), Township Seven (7) North, Range Sixty-seven (67) West of the 6th P.M. , ' County of Weld, State of Colorado; TOGETHER WITH one (1 ) domestic water well located thereon; AND TOGETHER WITH one (1 ) share of Capital Stock of The Larimer and Weld IIIrrigation Company. � I Qs. TOGETHER with all and singular the hereditamenta and appurtenances thereunto belonging, or in anywise I tk� ' �\ appertaining, and the reversion or reversions, remainders, rents, issues and profits thereof; and all the estate, / /1 Ili) right, title, interest, claim and demand whatsoever of the said party of the first part,either in law or equity,of,in i and to the above bargained premises with the hereditaments and appurtenances ' TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises above bargained and described, with the appurtenances unto the said party of the second part her heirs and assigns forever. And the said I II IntraWest Bank of Greeley, N.A. , partyaumfastpart,Vmitaelf, I and its successors,dotb covenant, grant,bargain, and agree to and with the said part y of the second part, her heirs and assigns, that at the time of the ensealing and delivery of these present. it is well i ' seized of the premises above conveyed,as of a good,sure,perfect, absolute and indefeasible estate of inheritance, in f law,in fee simple,and bath good right,full power and lawful authority to grant, bargain, sell and convey the same in manner and form aforesaid, and that the same are free and clear from all former and other grants, bargains, sales, liens,taxes,assessments and incumbrancea of whatever kind or nature soever; SUBJECT TO taxes for ' the calendar year 1984 and subsequent years and the Covenants, Conditions, Restrictions, Reservations, Easements, Rights and Rights of Way of Record, d if any; I II and the above bargained premises is the quiet and peaceable possession of the said part y of the second part II her • heirs and assigns,against all and every person or parsons lawfully claim'' or to claim the whole or any part thereof,the said party of the first part shall and will WARRANT AND FOREVER DEFEND. AIWI1 ICE., WHEREOF. The said party of the first part bath caused its corporate name to be hereunto I. an e ' y its:P President,and its corporate seal to be hereunto affixed,attested by its Sec . end year first above written i .t /nJ ,,(/ s ,� _,l��._ I -..1'?eeeeC__� ..In/i7eralY�sL...Ban(lc._n�..Gsceley.. _Ii..A— II / Executive Vice President aainwi ..........—______County .",.•,,SA',ATE OF COLORADO, IIw._County of Weld.__}" Tile h4 f 1 trureent was acknowledged ore me this 8th day August l8 b9 C-at G�flPG�7~ii✓of, and 1 G /�t�/�,"'"^�"� �^ ' as sectary of V a corporation. .'.F„ P U S,`�VV __ /Ky ao •alto aioa expires e��/�/�� / q (/f ll rye tp�ti, .:�� Witness my band official aeaL - Ormi,n Mears 1•e W.. No,IQ& WARRANTY DEED--Cerpontba.-Spofford Publishing CO..1P24/G Stout BVM,Deemer,Cblorbe-90 . .. '• • BOARD OF DIRECTORS =%� ' ERNESTTI0DES ." NORTH WELD COUNTY WATER DISTRICT ALEX HEIDENREICH CARVROBERT 5 PSON ,7 __- HIGHWAY 85 LUCERNE.COLORADO 80646 W.M,MCKAV I LYLE NELSON,MGR, , P.O.BOX 58 - PHONE 356.3020 ' April 16 , 1990 RE: Water Service- Jefferson Farms ' Dear Sirs, This letter is in response to your inquiry regarding water service to the following described property: 7681 WCR 74 Meter # 213 1 • J 1 . X Water service is presently being provided to the above described property. 2• X Water service can be made available to the above described property provided all requirements of the District are satisfied. If contracts have not been consumated with North Weld County Water District within one year from date of this letter, this letter shall . become null and void. IAdditional Comments: ' Sincerely, INORTH WELD COUNTY WATER DISTRICT Ly a D. Nelson , Manager LDN/wb • G'•C C °3 .• • R • RECL ADED EXEMP-TION 1 NO. L.r` OJG SHEET 2 OF 2 i ^ \^_/ ?veto c • ormrr,�4POk0 1 76 • .,. . h I ; el •• L� .. . ' . � 'h. ' 0fo-.---- ----/t > S?elion 92, 7.7N., RinW.. Ih rt r--- - ---o `• i C1 l.e _� • c.) , • \ f\ - It `, W o' zoo' aoo 600' eoo P• ' k1 .S cor e 'J f j 1 ,OTA ' . 1 SCale , 1"• 400' '� •` = few COuvrr ROao 74 r�,.., • . PM! rorna 1 � \1 , r. , e Pins 1st LOCATION MAP ' SCALE. raS000• S. 89'37147"5. 2637.34' Center of Section 32 E. % corner Sec.32 1 1 4 . D . --_I--O T i� ,_ % ct) of o. No Q : H .... y kt , , L.) 11. .1 S.89'37:47"E. 2574.29' � 1 O•E W 9 8°b1'Z Y) " G '5°' Nm core � K. 1 M a �LOT A 54. 762 Ac. 9roSS N 'Ls 41,,3.O900"W 2/5O0' co 1 p • 21.193 Ac gross N O.- 389 4e. R.O,/fe ti p O N 04 /7 00%i! 6/.60, o a N.2r°03'oo E. 7e.ro -0.830 Ac. R.O.W. m 54. /73 Ac. Mil $ t 20.363 Ac. ne% • 8 1 ,u or s,no'w. moo' N " 3 h � N.90 00?!0 W N tOW'o°"w. MA4o' o, ' b � 14 • r i i 3 N.se•2r'oo"g naco' S. 78'a400'E: $ C : Q 4GG.71' a] zaa.zo' e l'...• % • 1/4) k. .. �, = r Gi CO N $ 4i 1 Al OG•00'00"E 235.80' u, s Oi O •t O o• V r Q O a -ti N ro•er•oo E. .�ass. o % O . -405.70' /�/a.2t' N m—aeo.Bx � 6,9a,o zi.,,�—" — N. 90'00'00"X 2060. 7. " � 1 1... no.So True Point of Beginning WELD COUNTY RD. 74 (--- south 4uar/er LtOrndr se cot: Sec. 3'2, 7:741.,R6711/ Sec. 32, 7. 7N., R.67W McRAE & SHORT INC.. 1207-ate Avenue Groin,a...r.y, cores o. eoa2/ 84 OBro k lel N. t \ y r .37 n•r-7:�� Sri �`}'A.•}ro '/4.__ Proposed7-',.,.:•..,� - . . / +lr .. - .� , 1,.�N _ W_ indsor North � z r _ �`• Annexation 1"N - t. --�{ 1" o-•• ay ., ` `; — — • SC IN,-•; •� �• ..T _ fi - -d •i .r✓ lr_9 �• • / 3E•L • F 1• 1••. y S ," • ---r . Ave .•• • - . 1 , • 4 y. C' \• . • .\fir.,+/ _ ._ Miwfri ICY • viva _ •c _rtr _ . N.5---.., E IA POWRERE :REATION CORRWOR , r ptualplan—tor leviewPurposesony a - r u▪ p toy losiiiramositam •wwr�.•/sw•1/.�OO�FYYCrM14! 4 .`^ _r •-.1 1 i� .J 9.r1•imm. L - / l 1•VC •II r +',.,war«.-r LSO./MMIM•—. •Il•e - 1✓rdA•��1 •! e t• �• • _ -oONCLoISOLLO•sOLsoloOSTIPSOP1141Ins.WS Iww.ro—w.•— . . .- . l•� •,a•ar•4r•.ruw•w.•Yw•• 1 �. • •• •`, •r -••OWL bOOMOVILII Lsoso;LsOOLsSOOLLSOL 9, -• S�14:44.3:15.19 FORT(°.0416 �e•s•awrnlwM—trr+. J- �.. •. .�� . _:1 ^e m - !Olin"' . 1.9441�Or•11^,ft ' y.� o: , •• �- �••�3.. X777 ` ` ..11 1L,•r 07-v t..i ;if S:• .. .� .t/^ ry �-•Y .•,• •/ \ ••j�4 • 4.40 Q ••r••• ..OO rnam.-1�� ain. � r. r/�p .: � Trvum _ �m • M.•••.•M^•,C•easm!1-•.'11•Ynw• ..�� 4 Q• W►ms011. �. • O �r" +•.,•`i. • ,..• -w 4a.y�•1••r^I•� - •••pM./�•M•w.rew•� Ida' Y+� • • '(y•w�r • ' .w:J`71.1'-.:-••%•% tl:. a ' r gee"Lt, . rt v' iL o . a4 .� I•' t_F,.� •. i ..1 ;I: •c 2'` �.• •"�. :(r 1. r i t•^,. . •• •,j S • . !', + " • .;ice t •r- r 1.Y r wrt.s•artwoomi • ti 18 • ;�. J r _ � K ..O.,,,,p,„,.6 r "^w? ' . .. I �`'ywt. . - -1�v. Nil+r r+ 1y ! .t° 4IP by .t: '7mrC �♦''>� -NpKS ;•gam ' �'� t3 ,��'w� \S� /r 1 .�P ti v� d " +" F'�. ) 'r -try i' 11'1r�• ' ✓- 6��Iw �� } IyA �j-• F 34 At r 5 Y .. 'y r1.•aY.,w. d7 . �a a'i Luc� *'" v ♦ 4�1_ ^ t. a 3 } 'r,..33 �! t' :'q �] s. 2•. '..: \Y. WI' ..rr�� '.l•W �Y �i a.4 J f.� •r.. 6 f.X°•M1, . t A ?. t1 37, r . . r. :t'4'1" \ . �r . 2.33• p. .':t�w i.� a♦` ri}yJA k, `i`r ,ti •. -,% '' A r�; Y ;lir T. :yiti. r.i . ,4430' '1 ` y.4' �{p, �j A.. 1^Q. ''�• �jlr�3'1. t,^ 'fi♦ .�� / -� r " w r Sh '..Uij �9 +Y �tY ' t •,. !� h.�.Y1I'A a JJ � .\7y I A3 _y1 ♦ ' y 4 '1 sl , `' ,.1�,.` 4:'1, 1' ' I 3 x �`.° r h's.��w..vY Fi �••;k{" K. . a. :1,17. 7*I2P. 1. �. V r n r fi .33 46 •�-.}, � ,r r•: 79: i .4', , ..1�. 64 •r ° r ) wvv1.. ,.wy !JI ..i{rr f/f "hr+ n• �..., .r l �xf, pi, r L_ ..r.....7,:A',j �, ` 1._6 �'°♦ '� .♦? y „ 4. J • l r ` ' ^'' . � . n. r ��` , �, •, a, A ..63 r, y_yMiLi r.! 4 .�w ��nn r ,y 4'77 ,,. - •� �gr «' y �,..Ya r•fir"'- �� '�.��. 1^,t.dn ' « ,��N' '. 4 r1t, I nw. .r : ?r • ‘�I r y � � r'Q r Q a I At. v[«w Y ." . 4 , 0I a v q y`33 •gidEF1, d .•k\� ,Y..v e q w Jq' ,::,ti,.6 ✓ r<,�'� A SA �4 dw"' ', Fay�,4 w• �=., 4A , y1 tiiy'w'14`�ra y fear r�4,{ sYs y lr _..t t-,r,,,• IJ ,-. 3 hl �. .. o? ?Li a �j:Sy;tr\Cl.. �w•Y '�.e • /Arj'337ti .y \yC„ `�,.yy •` , 2.4..E, Fn.4` }. •� Fry ' � ,I M • .lxr t<♦a fir'.A.tip- • ,,,u yyx�• 4. ,] 8., -, a fir K-6 2 r rsj y uM1• r1P..j?' yt' 1 �+ Jj•. - �1��'i4l I f.,:•Y Y.Q�'" !� 1. 'V .i.y1�2 •} I "1r .4! ` Y'S _,G'lr t �J /1 r a y W p y;,t.- 9?,Y • F nC' \ y, 63 � ' fear 5* .d 4. "�.'n. '•µ , 4� . 6 i , 4 ! .7 y � v r 6 rD3 ,3J t3 64 ✓ t }r i . T I�a 4 Rbe 3 WI r r ♦ n� ,41 41,tiZSZirittiR �r / 4 , .ii ,t 1 , {. \•1 ':74‘":"—j., �, I .' Alm./ 'I. .r1f• -� •+F•I w a ..".P i• ..a",Fn :" '. lry IR '�, •� 'IIs. cr�4i 35.. ' -1...,'^ `Ny JI 4'.�„ 1,7 ,±:245. r JJ\; 3t... ,..j:'" r �., r,y6'b'c9,41 .w Wes'• 4 ` ., ]7 a4 A7,J��. 24 .. ,1: 32 ,33 t. .„,,,,p0. ..484 ' ' ,• w iOy's4; PSP,Y :elk rR. 16a.��' n'i.I. 4 a.�` 0�w e • + :i 08 Y ' F lJ'rt -A*•~' III. r� Iy, FI. M , .. I�v v ✓7 3 17. '6. rr. �/.�51 1 rq�' ..� a` .,mss. ♦vs. c, w 7y nP'.�„3 } 1 -® - - F ' ' . _ . '4Y yN ; sl ��;. . y, w••., ,; %." "sc3w� •;33 ._ Prime ....._ SENDER: Complete itertiaLi1 and 2,when IldtlKbnel services,ere desired, end:Pantalets Rears 3 and 4, Put your address in the"RETURN TO"Space on the revolve side,Failure to do this will prevent this card from being returned to you.Thereceipt t will DrOyipe WM the norms of M . es � available. itflQ dace oo{{dee�1rvrv��rv,-For atl�twna ass t following sarwces are onsu t postmaster or ass and check cozies)for additional servieelsl requested. 0Z. - 1. ❑ ShOw 10 whom delivered.date,andaddressee's address. 2. ❑ (Erna Ilvery Zara I-4 J E,. 4. Article ben a 3. ArUcb.Atldrwsa0 ... .. (�< --/OO e n 0 kb cG p C b'e W N a' . T Ile of Service: D, w-s ix ,n HARRISON RESOURCE CORPORATION Registered ‘. ❑ inured V Poo 769 WHALERS WAY C.▪ CC too ti ¢ m SUITE A-200 ,.J Express Mall ❑Ro I�:4111`ve Cr 0 3 f 04 r 0 FORT COLLINS, CO 80526 Always obtain signature of addressee cc 5 kr =O 3 p TE DELIVERED. `a O o y w ddress (ONLY if uo-z a pwc a o .x. 5. Signature —Addressee a4 red '! pad) L W i w N .mod % . X ..-c,A'V a o z1 . V W: & .. B. Sip r ..1,..Wt + � `' C , CC a F F+ $ e X « , /`n/� \ .-„,. 2 rT .. PC n � 7. ato of Dahvery (/ �� l0 O O nl\ r"- cn W ;T • _. 71 PS Font 3811. Apr. 1989 .ue.O.►d.tsasfs.a/s DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT .- ' —e-3 an47. w..,p,01 rt,0 ..,,e r aim 2 amen aaad.onat services are desired, and cOmplete Ira Pot your address in the"RETURN TO"Spate on the reverse side.Failure to do this will prevent this card from being returned to you.Tha_reNrn_tacaiDUt>2will DrOeide_l(pa She n_O=of the Dere�o Qgll,._ , the dem ofileAivery,For additional 9eaf t following services are a emabb.Consult postmaster Tor Teas and check 6oMes)for additional service(s)requested. J 1. ❑ Show to whom delivered,date,and addressee's addresq. 2. C. Restricted Delivery (Fare charge) (Fern charge) D' 2. 0 3. Article Addressed to•,sa 4. Article�NN}uumpbberr ��jj CI 08 .. _ %Qal - 909 D' w 5 rc w a Tape of Service: to G N N 0 Y I AMIGO FARMS, INC. iJ Registered 0 Mewed a-g mill u• ti r o CAROUSEL, SUITE 100 IEicerttlsq,.� 0 COD U 8.`f, N 0 WINDSOR, CO 80550 O Express Mail ❑Return Rh — .A CL E J kn O a „W Alwsys obtain signature of addressee lit N x Y mot., O U • _ —_.___. a spMt antl GATE DELIVERED. 0.T red O t 5. Signe re —Addressee 8. Addressee's Address (ONLY if q� y\ requested and fee paid) O. V W U p & § ' v X. X � �4i--rte cc 0 O o 5 z 6. Signature — Agent .. O z o. 3. X N " '" r" 7. Date of Deliv 12) - 9 ) PS Form 3811,Apr. 1989 .0.s.0.s0.1awasals DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT Put your address in the"RETURN TO"Space on the reverse side.Failure to do this will prevent this card from being returned to you.The return reties*, lie willprovge ou the npnz cif the Darsgn delivered to and the eta of delivery.For additional fees the folbwxareq services e available.Cone t postmaster for Tees and�check box(es)fa additional service(e)requested. W1. ❑ Show to whom delivered,date,and addressee's address. 2. ❑ Restnned Delivery Z (Eat charge) /Etna charge) R tn3. .ARIde,Addressed to:�Tl 4. Article Nu�lber �o V 8e• — 10 O O L O ^ w • T�of Service: "� u'$s JAMES A. AND JOANN J. OCHSNER Cr w g u Registered U Inured F N r ' 00 7422 WELD COUNTY ROAD 74 edified ❑coo ru cc a z a o pptt ,nri WINDSOR, CO 80550 Express Mau^ O a ItZire enrrlise 0' C in O FyE-i 0 Always obtain dn pnum of addressee —a O g o '-- ---__________. or agent and DATE DELIVERED. • r:: U O 5. Si ure -A ruses 8. Addressee's Address (ONLY/f -VI 0,Y Cl V ! X J4-./ a requested d fee paid) v f c_ w C x a o � F 6. ture - entw cc rA v) c! X 41 N z a • 7. D e of Delivery tin 7-fa-g'd . - - PS Fpm 3811, Apr. 1989 wus.6Ro.tss►asate DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT I w1rarivent this card from being rectanad to you.Tna reSum receittS tO,will DOWOO y9u the name the�rson delivered to and the QsM of deEat%FOr addRanel fees the followmg serwCes BM ava7 •e. t postmaster for fees • e • c x es) r additional service(s)requested. 7. O Show to whom deliverad,date,and addressee's address. 2. 0 Restricted Delivery (Extra charge) (Faro ehaege) U 4 3. Arbgb Addressed net 4. Article Number g`ba _gI1 ll O 8, • r. Tina of Service: eit w a . � a I," DENNIS M. AND BONITA L. STERK L) Rag;.ts,ad O insured -�yy' 7511 WELD COUNTY ROAD 74 y" tL S ru ¢ y .1". z O WINDSOR, CO 80550 O Express Mail O Rattan Plcpt LP t z ,n a Mechem fliO CrV atilt Ccl M. 0 Always obtain signature of addressee Q e z o0 l — . or agent and DATE DELIVERED, -D u. L Z o ! 5. Signature —Addressee 8. Addressee's Address (ONLY if LEI r U I X regaeued ad fee paid) UT a e' V E a LtiG` z m u 6. SI ture —Agent. /f` r,f °�*/1f,`h ii z � CI I, l c 7, ate of Delivery z ~ z 7 i7-5i J a � at , PS Form 3811,Apr.•19$9 .us.0.►0.tesauseis DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT - T • • . ..rte.,. -...... .. � _ ._ 4.� _ _ _ �NJwn n.ry�) .9S 4p 9C?S/l , • SENDER: Complete Mi s 1 and.2 when additional services are OeaNed, and Complete Items 3 and a put your address in the"RETURN TO"Suede on the reams side.Failure to d0 this will prevent this card from being retumad foVeu.The return Meld;fee will.prOv0 you the name Ot the person(trod t0 and the date of delhpry,For additional fees the following servlpee are mashie.Consult postmaster w tees - and�check bowies for additional servicel s)requested. . 1. O Show to whom delivered,date,and addressee's address. 2. ❑ Restricted Delivery (Extra chary) Wawa a Marge) a 3. Article Atltlro. to: 4. Article Number S Sew _.. _ ._ CI aC � co 0 in Ire of Service: LL&' 0 JOY A. JEFFERSON � e of Seretered ❑Insured 0 r F- 35 MARTIN LANE *Certified ❑COD a- Cr o g o co I ENGLEWOOD, CO 80110 L7 Express Mall ❑bur Mari^s Raid! CC lE V8W rn W h Always obtain signature of oddness* O K, W 7 6 OV u �— w agent and DATE DELIVERED• ▪ u.aLL cat0. w '1 pp, F• 5. Signature —Addressee 8. Addressee's Address(ONLY+J a V' in FpG P I R L X ,ey,esred and JK pee)8. Sig re Agent cc < d, W 1 { f I� 0 in Z 7. v Delivery l PS Form 381 1, Apr. 1989 su.9,0.R0.+eeefde++s DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT • SENDER: Complete)"ma 1 and 2 when addnlonsl services are desired, and complete IFeme 3 and 4. Put your address in the"RETURN TO"Space on the reverse aide.Failure to do this will prevent this card from being returned to you The return receipt fee willDrovide you the name Ofthe person delivered t4 arm. he f li FOr additional fees the followingservices ara available. Consult postmaster or tees an c Ow ea Or adOetionel sevicels)requested. 1. ❑ Show to whom delivered,date,and addressee's address. 2. O Restricted Delivery TE p (Extra Marge) (Extra caame) 2 0 3. Article Addressed to;,, _ . •, 4. Article Numbers 9vd O +u g� I T of Service: 1= rr i• t 1 1. v AMIGO FARMS, INC. 1GRegistered ❑Insured � w r'2 c) 0 P.O. BOX 60 Certified ❑COD �pt Cr V.,, p-, o0 MILLIKEN, CO 80543 Q Express Mail ❑Re Mennen Rd159 CC O ufq rn O Always ewwn efpr+suss of addressee Li.Ln `s b ,T,__�-- — of spent and DATE DELIVERED. tJl — 2 � X Z a Ad4rosi __ 8. Addressee's Adorns (ONLY if P.O. 0 m x � X 1 l requested-sad fte Paid) O C7 • .~-1 $ u D ig ature —Agent I•, O a a 1(-) •.4 X - • • SENDER: Complete Item and 2 when additional services are Desired, and complete items , a 3 end 4. Put your address in the"RETURN TO"Space on the raver*side.Failure to do this will prevent this card The um receipt fee will proy a VW the nam°.f the person elive t�e from being returned to you• return roG J I dptp p(delivery,For addrtwxw fees the following services are available.Consult postmaster w ees the hndcheck bottles)fOr additional servioels)requesfed. .-a 1. ❑ Show LO whom delivered,date,and addreseeeet address. 2. 0 Restricted Delivery . 4 (Erna thane) (Egan charge) J M 4, Article N C 3. Artlda Addressed ...... nn -cite 2 o X t}-ol cit .A 0 8 f+ .n n T�ve Of Service: 0 cal 5I � ,N KENNETH J. ADTD MARGARET K. HALL U Registered 0 Insured LL P IX : V W c 901 SANDY COVE LANE t' certified COD pt N to " FORT COLLINS, CO 80525 ~.;'rase ateit".'. fee Mera^eiediiee CI Ong( ..3 O Alvrsys Obtain efpna[un of addreaMs Cr CC�.4 ; q p1 V -,_„T. _ or agent end DATE DELIVERED. Ode( Zz 7 e - D W - - ¢ O rn 8. Addressee's Address (ONLY if I� o.e€ V Z 5. Signature —Addressee requested and fee paid) of t1 0 • .- 0 ,4"7O ,4 � X i 0. V 2 A o )r 2 O. Sig Lure Agent. CC W any) V _ X 7. Date Of Delivery W O O 1 J4 a w • _ —.. PS Form 3811, Apr. 1989 ou.s.0.r0.tses•23aets DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT m arnearniCAIIIIFI M gourmets.&&ice's)raw yat0O. 1. 0 Show to whom delivered,date,and addressee's address. 2. ❑ Restricted Delivery Mora charge) (Extra chord) 3. Article Addressed,to; ..r�-:: . . .. 4. Articl Number • Te�?-9 o 7 PETER C. AND NANCY D. HYLAND r Ire of Registered ❑Mewed e r • 2515 FALCON ROAD lti O J x •nom Certified O COO O u%- FORT COLLINS, CO 80526 Express Mel f"a°`Me Chs • rr Ea!, Fa W Ahvsys obUi.nsture of s00r«sss e0 2 V U —� or spent and DATE DELIVERED, ga- U`e q 0 5. Sig -Addres if 8. Addressee's Address (ONLY O 5< Z O y �/- requested and fee paid) .D 2 g y n 1>G rr] 8. 1 tuf0 a 2 z p4• � 0 'II Q� (I 7. Date of s�:e�4 Mt • ��'V i-J ...•S PO o's F-• �—+ PS Form 3811,Apr. 1989 sus.0.oO.+seataaa+s DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT ta1 in a 04 w s^" --- - - ------ RESOLUTION RE: GRANT CHANGE. OF ZONE FROM PUD (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT) TO A (AGRICULTURAL) FOR CITY OF LONGMONT WHEREAS, the Board o£ County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the 12th day of September, 1990, at 10:00 a.m, for the purpose of hearing the application o£ City of Longmont, c/o Calvin Youngberg, 1100 South Sherman Street, Longmont, Colorado 80501, requesting a Change of Zone from PUD (Planned Unit Development) to A (Agricultural) for a parcel of land located on the following described real estate, to-wit: Part of the NE} , Section 8, Township 2 North, Range 68 west of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado WHEREAS, the applicant was represented by , and WHEREAS, Section 21 .6.2 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance provides standards for review of such a Change of Zone, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners heard all the testimony and statements of those present, has studied the request of the applicant and the recommendations of the Weld County Planning Commission and, having been fully informed, finds that this request shall be approved for the following reasons: 1. The applicant has complied with all the application requirements listed in Section 21.7 et seq. , of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 2. The request is in conformance with Section 21.6 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: a. The proposed change of zone site is located in the Urban Growth Boundary Area of Longmont and I-25 Mixed-Use Development Area. A representative of the City of Longmont reviewed this request and found no conflicts with their interests. The attached conditions of approval make the uses associated with the proposed change of zone compatible with the I-25 Mixed-Use Development and the Urban Growth Boundary Area section of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. 900824 V �,, PLO S) 3 Cam: r/ d�°tant /�; IAtDrla .Paa; %the7A.. Page 2 RE: CHANGE OF ZONE - CITY OF LONGMONT b. The uses allowed on the subject property by granting the change of zone will be compatible with the surrounding land uses. The surrounding land uses include rural residences, agricultural production, vacant commercial building, and sanitary landfill. c. Adequate water and sewer service will be provided to this property. Water service will be provided by a water tap from Left Hand Water District and sewer service will be provided by the St. Vrain Sanitation District. d. State Highway 119 and a private road which provides access to the property are of adequate size to meet the requirements of the proposed zone district. e. No overlay districts affect this site. f. No known commercial mineral deposits are located on this site. g. The soil conditions on the site are such that they do not present moderate or severe limitations to the construction of structures or facilities proposed for the site. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the application of the City of Longmont for a Change of Zone from PUD (Planned Unit Development to A (Agricultural) on the above referenced parcel of land be, and hereby is, granted subject to the following conditions: 1 . The change of zone plat map shall be submitted to the Department of Planning Services within 30 days of approval by the Board of County Commissioners for recording. 2. Prior to recording the Change of Zone Plat: a) The Change of Zone plat shall be amended to show a 60-foot right-of-way from State Highway 119 to the boundary line of the property. 900824 Page 3 RE: CHANGE OF ZONE - CITY OF LONGMONT b) The applicant shall provide evidence to the Department o£ Planning Services that a 60-foot right-of-way with a 40-foot roadway will provide access to the zone district. The evidence shall include a written description of the proposed road, including a timetable for road construction, road plans , and road profiles. c) The following note shall be placed on the Change of Zone plat: i) A 40-foot roadway shall be installed within the 60-foot right-of-way dedicated for public use from the property to State Highway 119. The 40-foot roadway shall be installed an maintained by the applicant, developer, and/or owner' s association. No construction or maintenance will be conducted by Weld County. 3. Within 30 days of approval by the Board of County Commissionres, a 60-foot right-of-way from the property to State Highway 119 shall be dedicated for public use. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 12th day of September, A.D. , 199/0.. /0 f ;J�//� BO F COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: ` WEL OUNTY, CO ORADO Weld County Clerk to the Board ^ ne . Bran er, C airman �_a Ge ge Cennedy, Deputy Clerk t the Board See/IA, � APPROVED AS TO FORM: onstance L. Bar ert �r C.W. Kzr County Attorney Gor ac 900824 .AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION State of Colorado County of Boulder I, Dean G. Lehman do P to Me renlitgiamerlharata arta* rr,"Y"1and Me Weld Cagey Zoning O O Rc bYlrowul beheld Inth.aMmfersof . solemnly swear that the LONGMONT DAILY TIMES CALL is a sen a County oanmlaNnersSCOW Comfy• ceNredO,• catariCwMYM41 corner,915 daily newspaper printed, in whole or in part, and published in tots Street Pint•1004 otwAr.caerado.a the the City of Longmont, County of Boulder, State of Colorado, and aiR sited in Ste Connatao pa�ra...rre re- "(min Oor Mend m a eneed. Aav T veeeNa ro aorta see may a Irra which has general circulation therein and in parts of Boulder and Shoel IM N9lbent-0rewANnereele0 Re RV e. NM R.tt taawl reporter. mu Weld Counties; that said news i paper has been continuously and a,tectireatteenwar.emo.m.Ra e-McAmino.Me Rww uninterruptedly published for a period of more than nix months on to 1119 amt.Office NI Mat eN-own M _err realn ears edtorn a mortywe o►ye nrl>t. next prior to the first publication of the annexed legal notice of bee�by�r«ro.�o.,ing�noo r• ar advertisement, that said newspaper has been admitted to the BE IT ALSO KNOWN mat thew.as map.ee United States mails as second-class matter under the provisions •..onmayebemarnxed by the m°weael°*Me c�w«+`o me Iowa a Canty Canmlaelawn. loosed In of the Act of March 3, 1879,or any amendments thereof,and that m. wee e.enn cartwra-ea t.r.m nm -Sweet.INN Floor,Ortmfdt coins. said newspaper is a daily newspaper duly qualified for DOCKET NO,9012. APPLICANT publishing legal notices and advertisements within the meaning e c of the laws of the State of Colorado;that a copy of each number of Lo WAS ColorMermed S""t Leronwn.Caaeae e)S,l GATE:Se ptember lfl 17, 0 said newspaper, in which said notice of advertisement was TIME:MOO a A.M. t!, published, was transmitted by mail or carrier to each of the REQUEST: O1alo.a TAM Item Pvo(Planed p ORR Dwelapewn)ro A{ARrKatu• subscribers of said news accordin to the accustomed ra'I ��r, g LEGAL DESCR:PTIONI Part of w9 NEW or mode of business in this office. mon O.Tamer*7 C Ins all►.rdNd Colorado W That the annexed legal notice or advertisement was published LOCATION:seam a stae iu tear m er me egYnw:mets katlOn of Web Own- ,in the regular and entire edition of said daily newspaper once; bOARCI OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS _. - - WELD COUNTS'.COLORADO and that one publication of said notice was in the issue of said WELD COUNTsY1Y OLERKAU O.WARDEN BOARD RS';Shelly weer,Depny newspaper dated August 27 , 19 90. DATED:�w Nra,lwv" Pu011Med IA Me Daly taMrCal. La omptr, Ste,MINN 77,1910. 4.7241:21%9:Slyiker., General Manager Subscribed and swom to before me this 27th day of August ,19 90 Notary Public FEE$ 25-00 A.-„arTr �✓�' W CA romkts PHot N,12 C^.whgy.yAN 4 /"/ , /, , ATTENDANCE RECORD September 12, 1990 PLEASE write or print legibly your name, address and the name of the applicant or Docket # for the hearing you are attending, TODAY'S HEARINGS ARE AS FOLLOWS: DOCKET # 90-27 Jefferson, Special Review Permit DOCKET # 90-32 City of Longmont, Change of Zone DOCKET # 90-34 Flatiron Structures/Azalea Farms, Change of Zone NAME ADDRESS HEARING ATTENDING to .*4{ aI9gN �Ci, ! l./ C 9 4! 74 tele_Z-7 ,,,/d44-t_illit-got /J /'erc /0.13 a GLut-; Sie z qa - 34/ T4"i1ay. .r-csc YN PO lox acR39 Lon- mc„d, co 8vs-3-k 70-39 /34 1 ,, e/ S 1 5-s-/3- ��, �`'S C/:cl �f�. �7-"' CO Q0-,97 "11;6V 4/(!H ((into /1 aGiO/ W C^ /5-- ��>+ cr / 0-2 / o%KfJ��Fr de,.t, 35-�, ;e7", i.,, xt,AGect,„ ,{ 98- 2•, _ /�ankt_rekv,) s3'73 �?e-7Q4; a� ? U -,77 ag r 3�� 2 � 7 - • ,$ ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CITY OF LONCMONT Z-454 The Department o£ Planning Services' staff recommends that the following conditions be included in the Board of County Commissioner's recommenda- tion of approval for Change of Zone case number Z-454. 2. Prior to recording the Change of Zone Plat: - The change of zone plat shall be amended to show a 60 foot right-of-way from State Highway 119 to the boundary line of the property. - The applicant shall provide evidence to the Department of Planning Services chat a 60 foot right-of-way with a 40 foot roadway will provide access to the zone district. The evidence shall include a written description of the proposed road, including a timetable for road construction, road plans, and road profiles. - The following note shall be placed on the change of zone plat: a. A 40 foot roadway shall be installed within the 60 foot right-of-wiydedicated for public use from the property to State Highway 119. The 40 foot roadway shall be installed and maintained by the applicant, developer, and/or owner's association. No construction or maintenance will be conducted by Weld County. 3. Within 30 days of approval by the Board of County Commissioners, a 60 foot right-of-way from the property to State Highway 119 shall be dedicated for public use. SCOS 4 e BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SIGN POSTING CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER THE PENALTIES OF PERJURY THAT THE SIGN PROVIDED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES WAS POSTED ON THE PROPERTY AT LEAST TEN (10) DAYS PRECEDING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER'S HEARING FOR CASE # Z-454 . THE SIGN WAS POSTED BY: Janes Mieras NAME OF PERSON POSTING SIGN SIGNATURE PPLIC STATE OF COLORADO ) COUNTY OF WELD ) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS 1VN) - DAY OF Se PTeMleSeR . 1990 . SEAL a --6'S2'd.„c6 ” NO ARY UBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES LAST DAY TO POST SIGN IS: September 2 19 90 x'0051.>/ _ � P • BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SIGN POSTING CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER THE PENALTIES OF PERJURY THAT THE SIGN PROVIDED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES WAS POSTED ON THE PROPERTY AT LEAST TEN (10) DAYS PRECEDING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER'S HEARING FOR CASE Y Certificate of . THE SIGN WAS POSTED BY: Designation for a Sludge composting facility James Mieras NAME OF PERSON POSTING SIGN SIGNATURE OF LIC STATE OF COLORADO ) COUNTY OF WELD ) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS II+h DAY OF SEFIIEMSE P- 1990 SEAL y NO ARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES O-1- U-92- LAST DAY TO POST SIGN IS: September 9 1990 y�0574 NOTICE Pursuant to the zoning laws of the State of Colorado and the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, a public hearing will be held in the Chambers of the Board of County Commissioners o£ weld County, Colorado, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, First Floor, Greeley, Colorado, at the time specified. All persons in any manner interested in the following proposed Change of Zone are requested to attend and may be heard. Should the applicant or any interested party desire the presence of a court reporter to make a record of the proceedings, in addition to the taped record which will be kept during the hearing, the Clerk to the Board's Office shall be advised in writing of such action at least five days prior to the hearing. The cost of engaging a court reporter shall be borne by the requesting party. • BE IT ALSO KNOWN that the text and maps so certified by the Weld County Planning Commission may be examined in the office of the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners, located in the Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Third Floor, Greeley, Colorado. APPLICANT DOCKET NO. 90-32 City of Longmont c/o Calvin Youngberg 1100 South Sherman Street Longmont, Colorado 80501 DATE: September 12, 1990 • TIME: 10:00 A.M. REQUEST: Change o£ Zone from PUD (Planned Unit Development) to A (Agricultural) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NE} of Section 8, Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M., weld County, Colorado LOCATION: South of State Highway 119 at the approximate location of Weld County Road 5 BOARD or COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO BY: DONALD D. WARDEN WELD COUNTY CLERK TO THE BOARD BY: Shelly Miller, Deputy DATED: August 6, 1990 PDBLISHED: August 9, 1990, in The New News SCOS 12 Ex h; bNi- N. • • STATE OF COLORADO ) )s.s. COUNTY OF WELD ) David S. Reynolds, being duly sworn, says that he is publisher of The New News, a weekly newspaper published in Keenesburg in said County The New News Page 11 and State; that said newspaper has a ^-- - - 1" general circulation in said County NOTICE -- and has been continously and Bt aroma wetd uninterruptedly published therein, al mVitaleiAe during a period of at least a" p� fifty-two consecutive weeks prior toWtdd the first publication of the annexed • m to� _. notice; that said newspaper is ate° ate ' newspaper within the meaning of the �co��may be act of the General Assembly of the Should the agent et are State of Colorado, entitled "An Act . el Interested perry p a eat meters ` to regulate the printing of legal - aavaarecallm to m aamm - notices and advertisements, " and WalweVre �a�ko the b de amendments thereto; that the notice a,avmeam� of .sae u me.e Eve eaye okra W►eitEe cnet d of which the annexed is a printed «wwaaacoa�� .eau e. copy taken from said newspaper, was �� 7 the published in said newspaper, and in �be armia.da�'aatrc� . the regular and entire issue of b the�me� me every number thereof, swd -mini ame lab.�a mow: once a week for o�oa successive weeks; that said notice a LdWD,� was so published in said newspaper ^ aeooer Aye proper and not in any supplement �` ez, thereof , and that the first °�� Panel publication of said notice as �° 'a��a��e $ aforesaid, was on the r 1Y gyp( SWe wa y day of , 19 go , kaittoo of itsTIS y b. FN and the last on the 2... day of -` ro� 7BOARD . e i90o DelYiti ma Maul R 790000 m Subscribed and sw rn to before me this _Lee day of Da��_424 , 19_21?... IVIVCAIMMketnn eM;MS Marrh 1519, • • • • :y mEMORAn®UMDot io y a Keith Schuett, Planning August ©� h , To Dsta 1�Drew Scheltinga, County Engineer COLORADO From City of Longmont, CO2-454 and USR-914 Sublet: At this time we do not have a resolution to the problem of accessing the site. The latest Baldridge PUD zone change request has brought the issue to our attention once again. Attached is a copy of my memo dated August 21, 1990, regarding the Baldridge zone change. My comments regarding Baldridge also pertain to the City of Longmont's proposal. It is the responsibility o£ both applicants to propose a plan that adequately provides access to both sites. My thoughts on the matter are contained in the copies of the five memos attached. o[Ria)v)t\vi) S�1 AUG 2 2199D [1 DS/mw:prclong 'MG Cb. Inuaoi �kWplYJp Attachments cc: Commissioner Kirby Planning Referral File - City of Longmont, CO2-454 & USR-914 Planning Referral File - Baldridge PUD Zone Change, 2-457 c� � &JILL+r memoRcinDUrft Keith Schuett, Planning Augus�, 1990 � To Oata Drew Scheltinga, County Engineer COLORADO From • Baldridge Change of Zone, Z-457 SuDIKt: I have no objection to the proposed change of zone. However, the road issue must be resolved. Weld County has had extensive dealings with this site as far back as 1983. The chronic problem is the resolution of the access on the eastern boundary of the property as it serves the Baldridge PUD and the City of Longmont's landfill. Attached are memos dated March 17, 1987, September 17, 1987, February 18, 1988, and March 19, 1990, all discussing the road issue. It is not acceptable for the roadway in the PUD to have 30' of right-of-way dedicated to Weld County and 30' being an easement to the City of Longmont. If this right-of-way is to be part of the PUD, and provide access to the public to a place of business, the entire 60' right-of-way should be dedicated to Weld County. How the road is to be contracted and who is to maintain it, must be resolved between Baldridge and the City of Longmont. Note # 2 on the PUD Zone Change Plat that deals with the roadway, needs to be revised to reflect this agreement. a . �r� e N N DS/mw:prbacz c' d Attachments cc: Commissioner Kirby Planning Referral File - Baldridge Change of Zone, Z-457 Planning Referral File - City of Longmont Change of Zone, COZ-454 Planning Referral File - City of Longmont, USR-914 Subdivision File - Baldridge Richardson gCOS?A .1 (6, r� mORAf1DU�1 lifilk Keith Sehuett. Rlanning March 9, 1990 To Drew Scheltinga. County Engineerto COLORADO From XTRA Corporation. USE-779:87:3 suborn • It is my understanding, the City of Longmont is requesting approval of the existing landfill access road, along with improvements, to serve the XTRA Corporation facility. The proposal is to upgrade and pave the road. with the maintenance to be performed by the City of Longmont. Further, it is to be a "private road", owned by the City of Longmont. I have no objection to this proposal because the road will serve only a specific use, the landfill, and not be a through road providing transportation to the general public. The only complication is the potential development of the Baldridge/Richardson PUD. Presently, the zone district is approved. However, although applications have been made, no PUD has been approved. Also, no roadway plans have been submitted. reviewed, or approved. A road that is constructed as a private access to the landfill may not meet the standards that would be required in a PUD. The applicants for both XTRA Corporation and Baldridge/Richardson should understand, it is unlikely the proposed access to the landfill can be used as a public roadway serving the Baldridge/Richardson PUD. DS/mw:. -.._ra cc: Commissioner Kirby p '�—^:jam U R- 7g:J/ :2 ,�Sucdivisicn File - Donald Baldridge PUB Plan S-_90 '---- (Ba'dr_age/Ric ardson) OS°4 "i‘seit6e. mr�m®RAnDu(� . Rod Allison p r° X`luna;.ng Department o,t. FPhntary lR. 1988 COLORADO From Dkew L. ;chektinga, County FnginPPr. Donald Baldridge PUD Plan (Baldridge/Richardson First Subject. Filing) S-2.90 The final plat of the Baldridge/Richardson PUD First Filing is a small parcel of a much larger site. This area and site has had extensive consideration which includes: Use by Special Review in December 1983, Sketch Plan in December, 1985, and Change of Zone in July, 1986. My comments revolve around the entire site and the previous submittals to Weld County. A drainage report is included with the application materials. The conclusion drawn in the report is no detention facilities are proposed because there is an insignificant increase in runoff due to development. Also, the report recommends upon further development historic runoff rates be based on pre-development conditions. The conclusions are correct. However, the whole point o£ sketch plans and planned unit developments are being missed. The whole must be considered not just a part. Very seldom will an individual site have a major impact on downstream properties. When the entire developments are considered the impact on drainage is a different story. Drainage for the entire site should be studied in accordance with the requirements for a planned unit development. In the Use by Special Review in December of 1983 there was a requirement to construct the entrance to the site 100' south of Colorado Highway 119. This was not done. I recommend the entrance be moved in accordance with the original requirement. Adjacent to the east property line is a 60' strip of land of which the eastern 30' is an existing easement that accesses the City of Longmont sanitary landfill. I would assume the western 30' is to be dedicated to Weld County as a right-of-way. The extent and ownership of the right-of-way should be clarified. A right-of-way that is half owned by Weld County and half owned by the City of Longmont is an unmanageable situation. A clarification is necessary. It is my recommendation the road on the eastern property line be designed and constructed to Weld County standards, which should include paving. Maintenance and dust problems will be unmanageable otherwise. Weld County will not accept any maintenance responsibilities if the road is not properly constructed and paved. DLS/bf:mdb xc: Planning Referral File: Donald Baldridge POD Plan S-290 1 Keith chuett . ;1 Plann� Department Otember 17, 1987 �O , to • Drew L. Scheltinga, County Engineer • OLORADO Prom `�a`3 Xtra Corporation Landfill Access Road J subocu age -779: $e.3 I have reviewed the letter dated September 10, 1987. by Curtis J. • Ahrendsen of Industrial Compliance Incorporated. The road improvements proposed in this letter should be adequate to serve the landfill. If this road was to be opened to the public and to be maintained by Weld County a higher standard would be required.- • However, because the applicant has a responsibility to maintain the • road and because maintenance equipment is readily available at the landfill site, the proposed improvements are satisfactory. • DLS/bi:ixc xc: Xtra Corporation, 511 Orchard Street. Golden. CO 8040: Planning Referral File: Xtra Corporation 2C Fi p :.III®®® .v . t� r• . art N . + . I� .,te 1♦ Orb '7 l µ.•". 's <'r 'SS�, `..✓ COLORADO ��«�7F Dr�igN ,Seheltinga�,county Engineer '•� o ;� .rc.7 , ',1 '.t s ... v , , ,:X_TRA Corporation USR-779:87 3 e , N,�.; , ;, l ,_- Subl.ct . . • .w . r.. .r L k v � ,.y.. .. y -�. 1 � ... _ t. At",'—f.4." ti � 4" .f:.� '4:4%4:'✓..k'al�sr.. . 4.,..!...c....-,.;t:.)),,,...........- ' The access to the existing site off of S$ 119 is not caintained by the county. The access that is proposed .in the future should also be ' • maintained by the applicant. Any new access on the SE 119 would have ' to be approved by the Colorado Department of Highways: Since the traffic entering the site will come from SH 119 and the access and internal roads are to be maintained by the applicant. the impact on Weld County roads should be minimal_ Stormwater runoff from the surrounding land could run through the landfill and directly into St. Vrain Creek. A system on ditches or dikes should be considered to eliminate that problem. ' • DSLibf xc: Planning Referral File: XT RA Corporation 0 �---,� 17 Nl ,--0 lMAR 17 1997 OCOS1'1.2 Weld Ca. Placmnz CCEMISSiCC • DATE: August 6, 1990 TO: The Board of County Commissioners Weld County, Colorado FROM: Clerk to the Board Office Commissioners: If you have no objections, we have tentatively set the following hearings for the 12th day o£ September, 1990, at 10:00 A.M. Docket No. 90-32 - Change of Zone from PUD (Planned Unit Development) to A (Agricultural) - City of Longmont, c/o Calvin Youngberg Docket No. 90-33 - Certificate of Designation for a sludge composting facility in the A (Agricultural) Zone District - City of Longmont, c/o Calvin Youngberg Docket No. 90-34 - Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) and C-3 (Commercial) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) with C-3 and I-3 uses - Flatiron Structures/Azalea Farms, c/o Allan Brown OFFICE OF THE CLERIC TO THE BOARD BY:� ) ilif. 1/47enc. haf Deputy The above mentioned hearing date and hearing time may be scheduled on the agenda as stated above. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WE COUNTY, COLORADO d .i ec®S74 ac D Y �`i • • Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting July 24, 1990 Page 3 The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Planning Commission. Discussion followed. The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Ann Garrison - yes; Rick Iverson - yes: Bud Clemons' - yes: Jerry Kiefer - yes: Ernie Ross - yes. Motion carried unanimously. CASE NUMBER: 2-454 APPLICANT: City of Longmont REQUEST: Change of Zone from PUD (Planned Unit Development) to A (Agricultural) uses LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NE4 of Section 8, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: South of State Highway 119 at the approximate location of Weld County Road 5 CASE NUMBER: OSR-914 APPLICANT: City of Longmont' REQUEST: Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a Major Facility of a Public Utility (Sludge Composting Facility) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NE)s of Section 8, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , weld County, Colorado LOCATION: South of State Highway 119 at the approximate location of Weld County Road 5 CASE NUMBER: None APPLICANT: City of Longmont REQUEST: Certificate of Designation for a Composting Facility LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NE4 of Section 8, T2N, ASSN of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: South of State Highway 119 at the approximate location of Weld County Road S The Chairman announced evidence on all three cases for the City of Longmont will be beard at one time, but voted on individually. Keith Schuett stated the Special Review permit is considered a major facility of a public utility, therefore, the Planning Commission is - empowered to approve this request. If the Planning Commission were to deny the request, the applicant has the right to request a hearing before the Board of County Commissioners. The change of zone and certificate of designation will require recommendations from the Planning Commission to the Board Of County Commissioners. r.i r, h: ��+c w 44• Summary of the weld County Planning Commission Meeting July 24, 1990 Page 4 APPEARANCE: Calvin Youngberg, Project Engineer, City of Longmont, explained they are asking to withdraw approximately eleven - acres form a planned unit development and return it to agricultural zoning. They intend to Compost sludge, which will be treated and then hauled in from its wastewater treatment plant. The sludge will be composted with sawdust, end turned and aerated unit it has reached the proper moisture level. The dry product (fertilizer) will sold or given away. This site was chosen because it is close to the City of Longmont's landfill and wastewater treatment plants. All sludge will be composted within a covered building. This is not prime farmland, and there is no irrigation water available for this property either now or in the future. NOTICE: 2:03 p.m. - Lee Morrison is now serving as legal counsel. Taps 377 Wes Potter, Director, Environmental Health Services, stated composting is an organic process and needs to be turned or properly aerated to eliminate problems. He has reviewed the plans and methods of treatment and can foresee no problems. The Chairman called for discussion from the members of he audience. There was none. Cal Youngberg stated the City of Longmont has reviewed the recommendations of the Department of Planning Services' staff for each request and has no objections to them. The Chairman asked that a copy of the recommendations for each case be filed with the summary as a permanent record of the meeting. MOTION: Jerry Kiefer moved Case Number 2-454, City of Longmont, for a Change of Zone from Planned Unit Development to Agricultural be forwarded to the Hoard of County Commissioners with the Planning Commission's recommendation for approval based upon the recommendation of the Department of Planning Services' staff and the testimony heard by the Planning Commission. Motion seconded by Rick Iverson. The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Planning Commission. Discussion followed. SCO s`_f1 • Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting July 24, 1990 Page 5 -The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their deciaion. Ann Garrison yes; Rick Iverson - yes; Bud Clemons - yes; Jerry Kiefer - yes; Ernie , Ross - no. Motion carried four voting for the motion and one voting against the motion. MOTION: Jerry Kiefer moved Cass Number DSR-914, City of Longmont, for a Special Review permit for a Major Facility of a Public Utility for a composting facility be approved by the Planning Commission based on the recommendation of the Department of Planning Services' staff and the testimony heard by the Planning Commission. Motion seconded by Rick Iverson. The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Planning Commission. Discussion followed. The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Ann Garrison - yes; Rick Iverson - yes; Bud Clemons - yes; Jerry Kiefer - yes; Ernie Ross - no. Motion carried four voting for the motion and one voting against the motion. MOTION: Jerry Kiefer moved the request for a Certificate of Designation for a Composting Facility submitted by the City of Longmont be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with the Planning Commission's recommendation for approval based upon the recommendation of the Department of Planning Services' staff and the testimony heard by the Planning Commission. Motion seconded by Rick Iverson. The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Planning Commission. Discussion followed. The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Ann Garrison - yes; Rick Iverson - yes; Bud Clemons - yes; Jerry Kiefer - yes; Ernie Ross - No, and the reason he has voted no on the three requests is because he feels we need a county, tri-county, or ell county plan for working together on these dump sites, and we don't seem to have one. So, we send up being the dump site and sludge site for other counties. Motion carried four voting for the motion and one voting against the motion. °' -'a rig r • • Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting July 24, 1990 Page 6 Jerry Kiefer, on behalf of the Planning Commission, expressed appreciation to Ernie Ross for the time and effort .expended during his appointment and for serving as chairman and during this past year. The meeting was adjourned at 2:20 p.m. Sincerely, Rfted Bobbie Good Secretary tent' , ocer":5 o • MELD COUNTY C0MY1SS O:IRs 199911^ 25 PM 3 55 BEFORE THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, PLANNING COMMISSION 77�� TTCtC�LER RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIOIEH.S NAM Moved by Jerry Kiefer that the following resolution be introduced for passage by the Weld County Planning Commission. Be it Resolved by the Weld County Planning Commission that the application for: CASE NUMBER: Z-d5d NAME: City of Longmont, c% Calvin Youngberg ADDRESS: 1100 South Sherman Street, Longmont, CO 80501 REQUEST: Change of Zone from PUD (Planned Unit Development) to A (Agricultural) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NE1/4 of Section 8, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M., weld County, Colorado LOCATION: South of State Highway 119 at the approximate location of Weld County Road 5 be recommended favorably to the Board of County Commissioners for the following reasons: 1. The submitted materials are in compliance with the application requirements of Section 21.7 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 2. It is the opinion of the Weld County Planning Commission that the applicant has shown compliance with Section 21.5 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows; a. The proposed change of zone site is located in the Urban Growth Boundary Area of Longmont and I-25 Mixed-Use Development Area. A representative of the City of Longmont reviewed this request and found no conflicts with their interests. The attached conditions of approval make the uses associated with the proposed change of zone compatible with the I-25 Mixed-Use Development and the Urban Growth Boundary Area section of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. b. The uses allowed on the subject property by granting the change of zone will be compatible with the surrounding land uses. The surrounding land uses include rural residences, agricultural production, vacant commercial building, and sanitary landfill. c. Adequate water and sewer service will be provided to this property. Water service will be provided by a water tap from Left Hand Water District and sewer service will be provided by the St. Vrain Sanitation District. q Exkib%f 6 • • z-454 City of Longmont Page 2 d. State Highway 119 and a private road which provides access to the property are of adequate size to meet the requirements of the proposed zone district. e. No overlay districts affect this site. f. No known commercial mineral deposits are located on this site. g. The soil conditions on the site are such that they do not present moderate or severe limitations to the construction of structures or facilities proposed for the site. This recommendation is based, is part, upon a review of the application materials submitted by the applicant, other relevant information regarding the request, and responses from referral entities. The Planning Commission's recommendation for approval is conditional upon the following: 1. The change of zone plat map shall be submitted to the Department of Planning Services within 30 days of approval by the Board of County Commissioners for recording. Motion seconded by Rick Iverson. VOTE: For Passage Against Passage Ann Garrison Ernie Ross Rick Iverson Bud Clemons Jerry Kiefer The Chairman declared the resolution passed and ordered that a certified copy be forwarded with the file of this case to the Board of County Commissioners for further proceedings. CERTIFICATION OF COPY I, Bobbie Good, Recording Secretary of the Weld County Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution is a true copy of the Resolution of the Planning Commission of weld County, Colorado, adopted on July 24, 1990, and recorded in Book No. SII of the proceedings of the Planning Commission. Dated the 25th of July, 1990. o 400 Bobbie Good Secretary INVENTORY OF ITEMS SUBMITTED FOR CONSIDERATION Applicant City of "font • Case Number 2-454 Submitted or Prepared Prior to Hearing At Hearin 1. Application 51 Pages X 2. One application plat(s) 1 page(s) X 3. DPS Referral Summary Sheet x 4. DPS Recommendation X 5. DPS Surrounding Property Owner's Mailing List X 6. DPS Mineral Owner's Mailing List X 7. Three DPS Maps Prepared by Planning Technician X 8. DPS Notice o£ Hearing X 9. DPS Case File Summary Sheet X 10. DPS Field Check X 11. Planning Commission member field check X 12. Letter dated June 4, 1990, from Evan Hooper, X State Highway Department 13. Referral response dated June 5, 1990, Weld X County Health Department 14. Letter dated June 4, 1990, from Stephen Pott, X State Oil and Gas 15. Letter dated June 4, 1990, City of Longmont X Planning Department 16. Referral response dated May 30, 1990, Lee X Morrison, Assistant County Attorney 17. Referral response dated May 31, 1990, Longmont X Fire Protection District 18. Referral response dated June 1, 1990, Longmont X Soil Conservation District 19. Letter dated March 10, 1986, Colorado Geological X Survey 20. Letter dated March 5, 1986, Colorado Geological X Survey 21. Referral response dated July 18, 1990, Drew X Scheltinga, Weld County Engineering I hereby Certify that the 21 items identified herein were submitted to the Department of Planning Services at or prior to the scheduled Planning Commission hearing. I further certify that these items were forwarded to the Clerk to the Board's office on July 25, 1990. $44/r t �r STATE OF COLORADO ) •l (,+,, COUN114•4 tp ) �UBSCRIBF,..D AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS 2,S' day of Qla.� 19gp . U D LiCC�r \ SEAL P :*f r, 7 nF r.otC�`. lyati� ma NOTARY 11� 44y Osith+iwe Ups Ira►. 23, tihx ��--5d1/ +A My Commission Expires' • • n EXHIBIT INVENTORY CONTROL SHEET Case W_ Z - l )164n ,rnJt CIO LetrWnd� ap U Exhibit Submitted Bq Cl Exhibit Description A. B. CFI//�-+u+lov_�!�Lr7l.lQQ!/X� 1 . ,lltsvta.CJ F. Paz C a d G. N. I. J. K. L. M. N. 0. vC v P.A Date: July 26, 1990 CASE NUMBER: Z-454 NAME: City of Longmont, c/o Calvin Youngberg ADDRESS: 1100 South Sherman Strut, Longmont, CO 80501 REQUEST: Change of Zone from PUD (Planned Unit Development) Cr A (Agricultural) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NE4 of Section 8, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: South of State Highway 119 at the approximate location of Weld County Road 5 THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES' STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THIS REQUEST BE APPROVED FOR THE FOLLOwIIOG REASONS: 1. The submitted materials are in compliance with the application requirements of Section 21.7 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 2. It is the opinion of the Department of Planning Services• staff that the appllCant has sham compliance with Section 21.5 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: a. The proposed change of zone site is located in the Urban Growth Boundary Area of Longmont and I-25 Mixed-Use Development Area. A representative of the City of Longmont reviewed this request and found no conflicts with their interests. The attached conditions of approval make the uses associated with the proposed change of zone compatible with the I-25 Mixed-Use Development and the Urban Growth Boundary Area section of the weld County Comprehensive Plan. b. The uses allowed on the subject property by granting the change of zone will be compatible with the surrounding land uses. The surrounding land uses include rural residences, agricultural production, vacant commercial building, and sanitary landfill. c. Adequate water and sewer service will be provided to this property. Water service will be provided by a water tap from Left Hand Water District and sewer service will be provided by the St. Vrain Sanitation District. d. State Highway 119 and a private road which provides access to the property are of adequate size to meet the requirements of the proposed zone district. • • 2-454 City of Longmont Page 2 e. No Overlay districts affect this site. f. NO known commercial mineral deposits are located on this site. g. The soil conditions on the site are such that they do not • present moderate or severe limitations to the construction of structures or facilities proposed for the site. This recommendation is based, in part, upon a review of the application materials submitted by the applicant, other relevant information regarding the request, and responses from referral entities. The Department of Planning Services' staff recommendation for approval is conditional upon the following: 1. The change of zone plat map shall be submitted to the Department of Planning Services within 30 days of approval by the Board of County Commissioners for recording. Fit/COS.-MT.. • • LAND-USE APPLICATION SUMMARY SHEET Date: July 17, 1990 CASE NUMBER: Z-454 NAME: City of Longmont ADDRESS: Attn: Mr. Calvin Youngberg, Water Quality Division, 1100 South Sherman Street, Longmont, CO 80501 REQUEST: Change of zone from PUD (Planned Unit Development) to A (Agricultural) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NE} of Section 8, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: South of State Highway 119 approximately 1/2 mile east of Weld County Road 3-1/2. SIZE OF PARCEL: 11 acres, more or less POSSIBLE ISSUES SUMMARIZED FROM APPLICATION MATERIALS: The criteria for review of the Change of Zone is listed in Section 21.5 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. The Department of Planning Services' staff has received specific recommendations from 011 and Gas Conservation Commission. Referral responses have not been received from Boulder County Planning Department. No objections have been received by Department of Planning Services' staff from surrounding property owners. Q(08`."a `,r• y • awn • f'o'••••- '''' Ill( . • {• r. ,• � 1 ! ' ' - _ �'C • _INWIng _ .� pp�- cent, •�. •. ""'.. I d� kill -P^: d j q - rry ......, , ., . .. ,. _ A�[ ter '• • ,Iletire,.....„ ..al . . . T . , . • . �� *. �►, �. ` '' l �� 'r� a ISill• � I tlall V w O. .,..a' l ,� :ter `• r � ,f.ACM-. rrq \� C » ,• •� p�I .te1 P� o. . 7.r.v, •i+•a./�'(Ip115 / P 0 :::••• 0 pp p •1• • 1 t I : • IF II, I titAii on 1" • I1? Iv h • al\4 t• . or., Atituart . _ , _ . _ _ _!_ _ . ...,je trervitsk- SO- - - - - t , , a- ---- . .,. .20 ei ) : -, ;_. , i -��i��`,/�IIII� • / • I' .r :[MCM4NT[' / ..- ,I ��1 • NILL� lk �)1 1•,t , •N. •j Cr , • �• -0 Millii it• •• I a .- . "Orli ' r ;Di. r : F. . ..g: 34-2..t:______ a. _ .. • _ , .1. .:"...k.ia.. 'V r it _..s.p,4;•.. ,4_ 0 i socrttati.:44 1 is"Irro. .LA. _ _ .:_ ____ _nap; _ .,.. _ li 1 I tvii ,,, . . . , gati.. I, ;1' ' I si Ia.- r 7 1 i gcct:c i;11: '•:'.-t "Dil - - iMpSermai :9( am ..... . la •u .,_• _ • dd ((�� ;,-„„, .../; -Wet;:r) sts•TG• roji 41.7,-! • Qt ,�� •_ -•': -~ ,:t r„ It arenlIPT e. - 1. t _ + • (ri7 I • Ki,. � �,t•� • •�7� �A:numI 1; -� !. .. _„,...7.. . • ,..j{ a • 4. ii . i '� I .! r'/ r. f! r. ••�1•••••I {[�y,,]��JJJ 1•w..,.;Loma/ ( r/Say ((L r I• MM IIM yp ��(i�r 01 •• i H•r si p ,/ '.•-*.s . y, • r'1� .. rw. lrcx�n �lGiyi! v ... , ... '7 rNII 10 ! Dry. .� Irt`'�G�� •• 3:.1. I 1 a 1 r• • ft!11 •F ••• t ^ raj le ! n •^.^-nib s+ . 114 I 1 Q •• .` •�'_i .. 1c .. (( 1 M1!! �[ ( 1 .�e 1 .. 1 . -�. !s p•_ •c '_,' ,BASE:.II 4r i ,. w R • �N —-1 - R.681v1 y ' 1 I • I 1 •�� / �n i -� i % \ CAL'KINS LAKE ' / e ( ( f i;`sw) / 1� A i ' / '9OOI •''�- -- ,'-- 31 (UNION ERVOIR) - 2 ---- _4._ _i_7-1_---r-r It IN 3 A� \ k, .1 /-. , 211 r 'Jr-v y ! 1 ') , i I ' 1 �. I i I I, r .41.4 \ 11 \ .. �... / ( N� 1 i `l s • 11 A'�9� rr / 11. ) / fI 1 " "I / , / 1 6�. 1 / ' �I \\\C 4950 1 74 0�.� '� x / .R-.e L_ i.4 wrs7F N Iy6Pa%._ .;I - / - _ \-- - f�_� �� - 4 Ly x ' ^�9.� AM0in . o , F•4 2 j ( l „-c- ..),-,Q � li / l� • 49l:• •• �\' .0150.!4 home �� I---..*—�.... �.��!�� y x .�- .� ..i t-'w..;rt.+ ��i� ..ter 11 1 :I \ 1 1 �`/ I li `\ d .. ._ ` t 1 ". - ( I r. �\ 5 J 1 )) \ A Kc'7v a <.� J .JN. •901 \.../x r � O \ ‘L �O Si ♦900 e• Jale�m • . •9 ` 189P • x•8M _. . ,16M.sm x ' i �''�' i poi \ \po x`\ \.. ^l N ( \ N. ' \/ ' .. AND _'.��?) , aO, OM 4991(,) '` \ 4971 \ �` 1 p .se, sae /� ,._ 1• l o. I L \ l �, • • • I _ i W I. lig - ' 11C�YrO ___ ... . __ .......,_ � .. 4_ . ___ ....„ ...... ..._ . r ,, o..? aFf. , oxo o3GoC0E \ N 1 . r. S� f f' $ -F104'. k: 4:.i �� 4 . __ 0.(77172) ...... .A. / ..w 8 .�_ �4—"�- , t `. -4 r s4& .. � ' r ..4'' • Y '✓1 . IN, � -` .,... �, ny .N,h ��1rti� - • �. ti - a • I+G�+�_ 1 V 1,41F,I IA p • ✓ v n OSO I •44/ R • r • • Le• w :.p*� .• { . r ; �. , - - ,� - '., it'444- ` r • .. .�`- 4 a • FIELD CHECK • FILING NUMBER: USR-914 and Z-454 DATE OF INSPECTION: July 9, 1990 NAME: City o£ Longmont REQUEST: A Certificate of Designation, Site Specific Development Plan, and a Special Review permit for a Major Facility of a Public Utility (Sludge Compost Facility) and a Change of Zone from PUD (Planned Unit Development) to A (Agricultural) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NE} of Section 8, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: South of State Highway 119 at the approximate location of Weld County Road 5 LAND USE: S Old Longmont landfill E Private road, dryland pasture N Abandoned building, State Highway 119 W Farm production ZONING: N A (Agricultural) E A (Agricultural) S PUD (Planned Unit Development) for C-2 (Commercial) and I-1 (Industrial) uses W PUD (Planned Unit Development) for C-2 (Commercial) and I-1 (Industrial) uses COMMENTS: Access to the site is off State Highway 119 and a private road. This road serves the present Longmont landfill. No other access to the facility is proposed. The property is in crop production. The property slopes from the south down to the north. By: /0a ith A. Sc uett Current Planner St Cc e s • FIELD CHECK Filing Number: COZ-454 Date of Inspection: S130/70 Current Planner: Keith A. Schuett Applicant's Name: City of Longmont Request: A Change of Zone from P.U.A. (Planned Unit Development to A (Agricultural) zone district. Legal Description: NE} of Section 8, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County. Colorado Location: South of State Highway 118 at the approximate location o£ Weld County Road 3. (� n Land Use: N r (/.u• E ,I. S 14 W P �Q Zoning: N P.U.D. (Planned Unit Development) for I-I (Industrial) and C-2 (Commercial) uses. E P.U.D. (Planned Unit Development) for I-1 (Industrial) and C-2 (Commercial) uses. S A (Agricultural) W A (Agricultural) COMMENTS: V7" Si azure of Board Member ® i REFERRAL LIST NAME: City of Longmont CASE NUMBER: COZ-454 REFERRALS SENT: May 23. 1990 REFERRALS TO BE RECEIVED BY: June 6. 1990 COUNTY TOWNS and CITIES 'TX Attorney Ault - ✓7I-Health Department Brighton Extension Service "—Dacono _Emergency Management Office 'Eaton Sheriff's Office Erie X Engineering Evans Housing Authority '—' Firestone Airport Authority Fort Lupton --Building Inspection Frederick �— Garden City STATE Giicrest Division of Water Resources _Greeley Geological Survey _Grover .X Department of Health Hudson ✓X Highway DepartmentJohnstown Historical Society Keenesburg Water Conservation Board Kersey 7X:011 and Gas Conservation Commission �La Salle / Lochbuie FIRE DISTRICTS in Longmont Ault F-1 Mead Berthoud F-2 _Milliken Brighton F-3 New Raymer _Aetano P-19 Nunn Eaton F-4 '-'Platteville _ Fort Lupton F-5 Severance �Galeton F-6 Windsor Hudson F-7 -- --Johnstown F-8 COUNTIES �La Salle F-9 Adams It Longmont F-10 X Boulder Milliken F-11 �Larimer ----Nunn P-12 -- --Western Hills P-20 SOIL CONSERVATION DISTRICTS _Brighton OTHER _Fort Collins Central Colo. Water Conservancy Dist. Greeley -- --Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. t/C Longmont �Tri-Area Planning Commission West Adams COMMISSION/BOARD MEMBER ✓k Rick Iverson SCO je)4 . STATE OF COLORADO DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS P.O, Box 850 f -\\ Greeley. Colorado 80832-0850 "' ) ,^�� ,8� (303)353-1232 June 4, 1990 Weld Co., S.H. 119 Longmont Sludge Compost Facility Zoning Change (E. of Longmont) DOH File 45100 Mr. Keith Schuett, Planner Department of Planning Services Weld County 915 Tenth Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Dear Mr. Schuett: We have reviewed the City of Longmont request for zoning change from PUD to Agricultural, and we have the following comments. Access to the site has been addressed in our letter of June L, 1990, regarding the Site Specific Development Plan. No widening of the exist- ing access opening to State Highway 119 may be made since the deeded access limits the size of that opening to 24 feet in width. Any widen- ing would require an Access Permit to be issued by this office. The access road may be widened to 30 feet outside the State Highway 119 right of way. The decrease in overall traffic using the access will not require a right-turn deceleration lane to be constructed. Thank you for the opportunity to review the proposal. Please contact me at 350-2163 if you have any questions. Very truly yours, DOUGLAS D. EAMES DISTRICT ENGINEER Evan A. H o r Jr� Pe . Development/Access Coordinator EAH:smw cc: L.D. Yost M.A. Fanning File: Hooper via Crier —.77-77,717;) iggIg_g. 'el I�JUN ) 1990 r ,:jj 4 tltl10 Ga C' ;^n, 2 . t� " • f DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES I\ IIR WES POTTER - Ef S/WC4D - , v __ F J 1517 16TH AVENUE COURT GREELEY, CO 8061 0 111111De M AY .1 . 593 CASE NUMBER COZ-454 COLORADO fJJ\'C� JLV•JI ula'.w•LI JM_ May 22, 1990 • TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from City of Longmont for a change of zone from P.D.D. (Planned Unit Development) to A (Agricultural) zone district. The parcel of land is described as part of the NE} of section 8, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. The location o£ the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is south of State Highway 118 at the approximate location of Weld County Road 3. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Say comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by June 6, 1990. so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Keith A. Schuett, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find chat it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for he following reasons. oD d �c �� 8 z 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this aquestc iyll (is/is not) compatible with the interests 1:.£ our -i town for the following reasons: :78 %1 g o �.1 Q AiTi 3. X We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with' r J 1) interests. 4. A formal recommendation Is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Pleas refer to the enclosed letter. O Signed: I Ilj� �) 61-P41-414 l r Agaacy: O Date: 6 ` Sr el() vd^�n?:'{ STATE OF COLORADO . OI.ND GAS CONSERVATION CO ISSION DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES SUITE 380 LOGAN TOWER BUILDING WILLIAM R. SMITH 1580 LOGAN STREET Director DENVER, COLORADO 80203 DENNIS R. BICKNELL ROY ROMER Deputy Director (303) 894.2100 Governor June 4, 1990 Mr. Keith Shuett Department o£ Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Re: Application for a Change of Zone From P.U.D. to Agricultural Zone. Case # COZ-454 NE Sec 18-T2N-R68W Dear Mr. Shuett, This letter is in regard to your request to review and comment on the change of zone request in section 8-2N-68W. I have reviewed the application and do not find any conflicts with the plans presented. The only comment I have is #7 of the Narrative Attachment which stated that no mineral resources have been found under the property. The J-Sand formation is produced in this area and does have potential to produce as shown in the SW 8-2N-68W. I have enclosed an area well plat for your information. Future drilling in this area, should it occur, will have to comply with our safety rules, specifically: Rule 603 (a) Wells shall be located a distance of 150 feet or one and one-half times the derrick, whichever is greater, from any occupied building, public road, or major above ground utility line or railroad. Rule 604 (a) (3) Tanks shall be a minimum of 200 feet from the residences, normally occupied buildings, or well defined normally occupied outside area. Rule 604 (b) (5) Fired vessel, heater treater, shall oe a minimum of 200 feet from residences, occupied buildings, or well defined normally occupied outside area. If I can be of any further assistance I may be reached at 894-2100 . Yours truly, S11-22111N-3V- Step n Pott Sr. Engineer ' ' .-. .� . ::J� t r Yi�;.t•r�. 17 r+�'Y1�.'l1 Q�� . �� . .'�.; � � ��..: ` . ,�, ��rY� y'�� + t�� .�.� ,. � � - , � �.7f 11$(r�Yf �A'hf'� 1 � W i� j / \ 1a$�F�.�. �- a,� . . . ��1 + , '� ' �� .'�' . . . . s . r � � r .,}Wy.� i . . , . ' _ ��n ,.�i �rI ♦ �f��p� O _ t�J . . a ' . � M r. � . '�1 M , �1YYr�LY�~ . s �ano . � _ � , N � �.w.$qp� �•� �� dµ�� M �- ` V � , } `� .. � � M� � ',�. . i � � i��i�.��r M �'� , �. i w ¢y � p � � � ' �- 7� � �.S � y; � r � N $ � � . ' �z��T �� • R � F � ~ � / . � � �� `� � "� � w s�•` i O� 'y,- : i y�1 � .�1 � i.:�' OS �., ` � �� '� � � . . .� ! i\_ .. � ' . y�-� W� Q� �1 (��'f��} V"'" Ft�. � i � . �� 1C:;e � -' - � « A_ ; � � � � , '� • �,S�'G � _ ;, � !' . r R ,;�. y � : � 8' � W� � � .O� � 3 p+��Fa� ` �� y x .C . � � � v: �� 'o, � .i �rt� ' ' � � q�� LJ . � :�"�' y �-- . if " " ' y�- o' �� . �'. ' c ; ; ■;-..aYp � • Y �� .�JW O' • � � N s� , � � � eT � E V pp�y� ay� = � �� b a � �( � ^ _ � o ¢o �.�; , � � J . ; z Z � S ��. « � ; `� j � . 3.-y� )M �p i W�� W-. w � J'YV Y � •� �:}fV � g. i # A ' , a �:� ' ' . � _ � : . ��L� . _ . __. : _ � - _ __ .____. __ _. . . _._...�....�....�._ . x ; . __._ . _ � f W ' `.. � o � � � � � r � ,w r o, �� ; : � " ' �r , '' � 0o x� � -- � 1 =s w }� . a � ^ Yw0 � . t M �` � vA � � ��1� I � • J "- L• � Y � M ' � � ; �ef � = 3. , � • � � � • - y —y ! �� O a Y ( � . I Y � „ � � � L Z � i Z Jyy � � � O . .` • W,,+ Z � +�y N V F � " � , " �`. _ � i ___..... ..... . .___ . .. _. f � ¢, y� � � _ � _ ._. _ _ _ .. . �i � . . W. ' . z O " � � �+ t � � 9_ �? p .°`,: �� • .. 3"- r• o � �a ; ��e � �..�� , ��I� �. 9 r F �� /M _ ,� I � . � � " �: � ° � � . W J � � I � . W 3 I � � ' � % , � _ I Lo_ .� •. i a ' � . � � ��1� . . N I � O Q f � � ♦ p - .__. ..._�.. . .. ,.------ � � � _'__.� ... �. .. . _ . � y N . ._.__�. . .. . . . _ IJ - � . ....... ... .. ... • � . . . .. _ . �_� ._ N 1 �g � I J s � ~� � ' � � `_� '� � . .�Y I � � � � . � �a ' �,� • � �n � ao ! !� � Q , . . ,, i ... �. , � N 'yO e y� ; :: ��-y� Yl • � ��•_.. Y�l � � �rC Q W �M . � .Z .�_` i � � .� .'.p � � rt',p .Y �l (0 �f � '�, � � ;; 4 L 0 , , � _._.. �. _._.__. . ._,� , .. .. — , --.._ _. _._._. . . - _.. ... , x_. .� , , - �_. � . _ . ,j, � i � � � —� I r� ' ' � _ , � n # d � ,�,„ --.._, i ��' � � , � � � .. . ; ` . , � , o . a �� ,� ,� m F. �.. � ! __.... _� 1 � � ^ S _��_� , ' , �o _ __�g# .' , ^ • : ao ' • O� / �: , t+• ,,. t /. ; �y �� -� ,^� I 1 5 ' �,.. ��., �,, �n,� ' 1--I c�- -•_.._ � � � ,� . � i � • n Z4 i � V�. V�� ' .� w O S ^, � • Y _ Z _ �•: � O » . e•. �. y '- >. - ��' r. . . _j. . � ;--,- � ' �•-A. ' -� 5. .� r r�«w 1• �. � . _ t.y.. .i. _.. ...-�.._ _ .. .$.�.. - � � . � �.., .. .�, . � � :r � . � - - ; . r ::, � �� _: ,.,, , ,. , / ,,,, �;�J, Yt�� . � � � ��'��r ✓I:'�JY /h:�✓.. v i"� 11�.\" W ..wi:�l. •90 07/16 10134 y 91011810266720086 CITY OF LONGMONT 02 • • C L0ATO 4S: r• k Os .° DEPARTMENT or COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT f7 PLANNING DIVI8SON ONI Civic Center Complex / Longmont, CO 80501 Cv �O (303) LOi,P► .Tune 4, 1990 upw Mr.'Keith A. Schuett, Current Planner JUL 1 6 1990 g Weld County DepartMent of Planning Services 915 10th St. Greeley, CO 80631 MOOD Nswas gam ma Re: Case.Numbers: COZ-454 and OSP-914 Dear Mk. Schuett: Thank you for referring to the Planning Division for our review the City of Longmont's applications (change of zone and site specific development plan/special review) fora wastewater sludge composting facility. The facility is proposed to be located on a site which is.:.part of the Baldridge-Richardson PUD and is adjacent to the City's landfill. As the application indicates, all mixing composting, and curing operations will take place in totally enclosed metal buildings. The site will be bermed, landscaped and fenced as a buffer. This facility will use the existing road to the landfill for access. As part of this development, this road will be widened, regraded, and paved. The applications also detail this facility's operations and how the city intends to control any odors. The City of Longmont respectfully requests that weld County approve these applications. Again, thank you for the opportunity to comment. If you have any questions, please call either Froda Greenberg or me at 651-8330. Sincerely, . Brad: Schol Flanninnirector BS/cr a xer Phil DelVecchio, Community Development Director Cal Youngberg, Civil Engineer III File: N2050-8b #2050-8c QCQr '*1 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES 141 : LEE MORRISON WELD COUNTY (ATTORNEY 'S OFFICE WELD COUNTY CENTENNIAL CENTER GREELEY, CO 80671 illik CASE NUMBER COZ-454 COLORADO May 22, 1990 • TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from City of Longmont for a change of zone from P.U.D. (Planned Unit Development) to A (Agricultural) zone district. The parcel of land is described as part of the NE} of section 8, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is south of State Highway 118 at the approximate location of Weld County Road 3. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to faeilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by June 6, 1990, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Keith A. Schuett, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan f following reasons. : 4 � n L! 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel digs rem si ] (is/is not) compatible with the interepps;oLour� town for the following reasons: g 'v .1k‘ � 3. k� We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts w c :t6 interests/A-I' lilts -77 pr -c- 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Please refer enclosed letter. Signed:g Y J Agency: Date: 5 0 to i • DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES • • PHONE(303)3581000,EXT.4400 r915 10th STREET 1 GREELEY,COLORADO 80831 wi • h . CASE NUMBER COZ-454 COLORADO May 22, 1990 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from City of Longmont for a change of zone from P.U.D. (Planned Unit Development) to A (Agricultural) zone district. The parcel of land is described as part of the NE} of section 8, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is south of State Highway 118 at the approximate location of Weld County Road 3. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by June 6, 1990, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Keith A. Schuett, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. _ s G 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel thisarequeSC itl (is/is not) compatible wish the interest& of our 1.2.? town for the following reasons: - -, c .o .<) JLS� B. We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with J interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be . submitted to you prior to: 5. Please refer to the enclosed letter. • Signed: pk„,,, -- Agency4 n 11( . Mh N1/4‘ `t ItZ '2Qo SC 17 15, �,R k rnicshrr } V Date:si;-Z )-9?\ neC5?4 • 6 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES \ lag PNONEO03)3564000,D:cT,4400 915 10th STREET GREELEY,COLORADO 60.531 ik cAs£ NUMBER COZ-454 COLORADO May 22, 1990 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from City of Longmont for a change of zone from P.U.D. (Planned Unit Development) to A (Agricultural) zone distriet. The parcel of land is described as part of the NE} of section 8, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is south of State Highway 118 at the approximate location of Weld County Road 3. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by June 6, 1990, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Keith A. Schuett, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. c- ` c2)I2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our �. � town for the following reasons: K :o it O 11 P T t::::!!!!!) � x We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our g interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Signed: la/14ntiPd me. Jab* Agency: Longmont Soil Conservation District Jab* Date: June 1, 1990 R S 05°4 . itit • o • • 'Protiipit DFQ^erria= ITA= DI ANNIKinCGRVI(:FC j'• DREW SCHELTINGA WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPT Q 9,73 N. 11TH AVENUE O GREELEY, CO 80631 • MAY 2 5 1990 CASE NUMBER COZ-454 COLORADO Ile SO r %%roa► May 22, 1990 • TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from City of Longmont for a change of zone from P.U.D. (Planned Unit Development) to A (Agricultural) zone district. The parcel of land is described as part of the NE} of section 8, T2N, R68W o£ the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is south of State Highway 118 at the approximate location of Weld County Road 3. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration o£ your recommendation. Please reply by June 6, 1990, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Keith A. Schuett. Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for th following reasons. ? ` L C 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request ,O (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our it town for the following reasons: = o -1 3. We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. P s r to the enclosed letter. Signed• l Agency: €.nrC< c-.c t Date: 7((e,T 1CD SICOSEXI -Qs 111 ®RAIl®vili r7 Keith Schuett WilDc Planning Department March 17. 1987 To Dm {J Drew L. Scheltinga, County Engineer COLORADO From l . XTRA Corporation USR-779:87:3 SubDwr The access to the existing site off of SH 119 is not maintained by the county. 'The access that is proposed in the future should also be maintained by the applicant. Any new access on the SH 119 would have to be approved by the Colorado Department of Highways. Since the traffic entering the site will come from SH 119 and the access and internal roads are to be maintained by the applicant, the impact on Weld County roads should be minimal. Stormwater runoff from the surrounding land could run through the landfill and directly into St. Vrain Creek. A system on ditches or dikes should be considered to eliminate that problem. DSL/bf xc: Planning Referral File: XTRA Corporation .�.�nx,, [J DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES 3 3 • • PHONE(303)1564000 EXT.4400 (^k71 , • 91510th STREET 40.0 V1 IV; f� GREELET,COLORADO80631 • '.�J. wV ��. L•r•Y.•"" w...• 2titD3ER IISR-779:E7:3 COLORADO February 24, 1987 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: , Enclosed is an application from Charles Hayes, XTRA Corporation for a Vse by Special Review permit for a solid waste disposal site. The parcel of land is described as part of the SE} NW} of Section 8, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is south of State Highway 119; north of Weld County Road 20-1/2 and east of Weld County Road 2. This application is submitted to your office for review and recommendations. Any comments or recommendations you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the proposal and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendations. Please reply by March -3,-1987, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Keith Schuett if you have any questions about this referral. Thank you for your help and cooperation in this matter. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that the request (does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible u th the interests of our town for the following reasons: 3. We have reviewed the proposal and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5 , refer to the enclosed letter. Agency: .G.v�_�� .- ., c� Date: 'li 7 /F7 C C50`42 , MifflORACIDUrill oft. ) , Keith Schuett Planning Department September 17. 1987 To Din Drew L. Scheltinga, County Engineerin COLORADO From_ K Xtra Corporation Landfill Access Road sue;.et: cla -779: r,3 I have reviewed the letter dated September 10. 1987, by Curtis J. Ahrendsen of Industrial Compliance Incorporated. The road improvements proposed in this letter should be adequate to serve the landfill. If this road was to be opened to the public and to be maintained by Weld County a higher standard would be required.- ' However. because the applicant has a responsibility to maintain the road and because maintenance equipment is readily available at the landfill site, the proposed improvements are satisfactory. DLS/bf:mxc xc: Xtra Corporation, 511 Orchard Street, Golden, CO 80401 Planning Referral File: Xtra Corporation �£v ?1:4`- v • Md usta ce 1 Incorporated September 10, 1987 ICI Project # 1-1608 Mr. Keith Schuett Weld County Colorado Department of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 • Subject: XTRA Corporation Landfill Access Road Design. Reference: Design and Operations Plan for the Proposed XTRA Corporation Landfill, Weld County, Colorado. Dear Mr. Schuett: I have enclosed two copies of the proposed access road design for the XTRA Landfill. The road to the site will conform to these minimum standards and the owner/operator o£ the landfill may improve the road beyond these standards if he or she chooses. Additionally, maintenance of this road will be the responsibility of the owner/operator. The road design is based on conversations with Drew Scheltinga of the Weld County Highway Department. It will incorporate a minimum of 4 inches of gravel atop natural material. The road will have an overall grade of approximately 1 .8 percent from Highway 119 up to the landfill site boundary and an approximate cross-grade of 2 percent to allow the road to drain adequately. The access road will be a total of 32 feet in width consisting of two 12 foot lanes and an additional 4 foot shoulder alongside each lane. Triangular drainage ditches will be excavated next to the shoulders to carry any runoff. It should be noted that road maintenance and dust abatement is the responsibility of the owner/operator and as such, will be done on his/her direction. The equipment used to operate the landfill will also be used to maintain the access road to the site. This will allow the owner/operator to immediately work on the road if maintenance is necessary. Please review this design and let me know if you need any further information. If the design meets with your approval , please schedule XTRA Corporation on the next County / y Commissioners agenda. In the interim, we will have the I ryiFL design drawing added to the Vicinity Plate and ready the • -m S LI remaining information as per the resolution. v , as 511 Orchard Street Golden, Colorado 80401 oav 277.1400 �t /d121.1 ) � ; • • Thank you for your time and please let me know if you have any questions or require any further information. Sincerely, INDUSTRIAL COMPLIANCE INCORPORATED 66**-1—' /,vL-- Curtis J. Ahrendsen Environmental Engineer CJA/tb enclosures cc: XTRA Corporation 4.# tig`.›.• R ! 4 a �, , � _ £ v '' 7m1- o4U � �Q ,rsr le 1 04 g F ° n < . h s t 2 g tr ' ! 1 __ - % I � 6 N k yy t ` ,3 a p 3 t � ie A rot 7 r 2f -=4 ` )E L� � 23 <; a T <`. >1 i q i l 54: _ _ _ 4 i � 3 T r 5 r904 .a` � - s itO r 3 ; ) � < v �� , > a ' \ \ �ri . � ti ` vl - Q J, 4 1 `.) `J ^ x + I � 1 ,/ 4 1 O T \ 1 v at •IL, �t s.arr7 is ) • 16 C i= 1Z orietntio Ca ivIr OP- ()to \kil A•t fig WE-86-0014 RICHARD D.LAMM '�\ �►�, 'I` JOHN W.ROLD 00VERRoR iI fF DIRECTOR 1876 COLORADO GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 715 STATE CENTENNIAL BUILDING-1313 SHERMAN STREET DENVER,COLORADO 50203 PMONE(303)sas-2811 March 101 1986 G;.:oria V. Dunn ,�- y /Dept. of Planning Services Q gfigT n Weld County 915 10th Street :.;AP. 121986 Greeley, CO 80631 Wdd SA. sufsin41bmolml" Dear Ms. Dunn: • RE: CASE 2-426:86:1, BALDRIDGE AND RICHARDSON On March 7th, I was able to make a site inspection of this parcel o£ land. My concerns for gravel and the flood plain were negated by this inspection. This parcel, based on geologic concerns, is suitable for the purposed land use. Sincerely, L. R. Ladwig, Chief Mineral Fuels Section d1r:LRL-86-085 SCOSev GEOLOGY STORY OF THE PAST...KEY TOTHEFUTURE Div- ' �r WE-86-0014 N RICHARD D.LAMM * + GOVERNOR * * JOHN BOLD DIREECE TOR }1876 COLORADO GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 715 STATE CENTENNIAL BUILDING-1313 SHERMAN STREET DENVER,COLORADO 80203 PHONE(303)886-2611 March S, 1986 �4--� ,J �;17 • Gloria V. Dunn :11D 1 01986 .11 Dept. of Planning Serviceslt Weld County 915 10th St. Wald ep. Ramtim[tommtA m Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Ms. Dunn: RE: CASE Z-426:86:1, BALDRIDGE AND RICHARDSON We have reviewed this application for a proposed zone change and have these concerns before this takes place, and if it does, to address concerns for the planning o£ the P.U.D. This area is in the St. Vrain-Boulder Creek stream valley, and is in part composed of sands and gravels. Except for the SCS reports, which generally cover surface soils only, there was no direct evidence that economic sands and gravels are not present under this site. An investigation as to the possibility of sands and gravels, could be com- bined with the preliminary soils investigation that will be necessary for the preliminary plan stage. It would be prudent at this time, also, to submit a map showing the extent of the 100 year flood plain as calculated by the Corp of Engineers, or a like entity. For the preliminary plan stage, it will be necessary to submit a Geo- logic and soils report, percolation test results, profile test results, and a surface water drainage plan. If you have any questions, please call. Sincerely, /GP L L. R. Ladwig, Chief Mineral Fuels Section d1r:LRL-86-084 GEOLOGY CTOSen> STORY OFTHEPAST,,,KEYTOTHEFUTURE • s SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS CITY OF LONGMONT COZ-454 C.P. Richardson 1431 Elhurat Lane Longmont, CO 80501 Donald and Adell $aldrige 5525 East Platte Colorado Springs, CO 80403 City o£ Longmont 3rd and Kimbark Longmont, CO 80501 Ernest Peterson 12963 Hillerest Drive Longmont, CO 80501 St. Drain, Limited c/o Richard Domenico 8200 West 67th. Street Arvada, CO 80004 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES k\ RCN (303)3504000,EXT.4400 ' 91510th STREET GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 �i COLORADO June 29, 1990 Mr. Calvin Youngberg Project Manager Water Quality Division 1100 South Sherman Street Longmont, CO 80501 Subject: 2-454 - Request for a Change of Zone on a parcel of land described as part o£ the NE; of Section 8, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado Dear Mr. Youngberg: I have scheduled a meeting with the Weld County Planning Commission on Tuesday, July 24. at 1:30 p.m. This meeting will take place in Room 316, Weld County Centennial Center. 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado. It is recommended that you and/or a representative be in attendance to answer any questions the Planning Commission members might have with respect to your application. It is the responsibility of an applicant to see that a sign Is posted on the property under consideration at least 10 days preceding the hearing date. Sometime prior to July 9, 1990, you or a representative should call me to obtain a sign to be posted on the site no later than July 14, 1990. The Department of Planning Services' staff will make a recommendation concerning this application to the Weld County Planning Commission. It is the responsibility of the applicant to call the Department of Planning Services' office a few days before the date of the Planning Commission hearing to obtain that recommendation. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to call me. Respectfully, Ce‘,�$chuett Current Planner %e ed en fi KAS:rjg N DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES TIN PHONE(303)356-4000,EXT.4400 91510th STREET GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 • COLORADO May 22, 1990 City of Longmont Calvin Youngberg, Project Manager Water Quality Division 1100 South Sherman Street Longmont, CO 80501 Subject: CO2-454 and USR-9l4 - request is for a Change of Zone from P.U.D. (Planned Unit Development) to A (Agricultural) and a Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review permit for a major facility of a public utility (waste water sludge composting facility) on a parcel of land described as part of the NE} of Section 8, T2N, R68W o£ the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. Dear Mr. Youngberg: Your application and related materials for the requests described above are complete and in order at the present time. I will schedule a meeting with the Weld County Planning Commission after I received the State Health • Department's Certificate of Designation recommendation. A sign must be posted on the property ten days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Please come by this office to obtain a sign and fulfill the sign posting requirements. The Department of Planning Services' staff will make a recommendation concerning this applications to the Weld County Planning Commission. It is the responsibility of the applicant to call the Department of Planning Services' office a few days before the date of the Planning Commission hearing to obtain that recommendation. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to call me. Respectfully, it • c Qc.©A of Current Planner KAS:dn i7"n .T-zm7s-7o REZONING APPLICATION Case C 'oz y�y Weld County, Colorado Dept. of Planning Services App. Ch'd By: OS' Date Recd: 915 10th Street App. Fee: Receipt f: Greeley, Colorado 80631 Record. fee Receipt f: TO BE COLLETED BY APPLICANT. Please print or type, except for necessary signature. I (we), the undersigned. hereby request hearings before the Weld County Planning Commission and the Weld County Board of County Commissioners concerning the proposed rezoning of the following described unincorporated area of Weld County, Colorado: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SEE ATTACHED (If additional space is required, attach an additional sheet) Property Address (if available): l`T A. _ PRESENT ZONE Z-1&C-2 PROPOSED ZONE A-1 TOTAL ACREAGEII_00 OVERLAY ZONES NONE SURFACE FEE (PROPERTY OWNERS) OF AREA PROPOSED FOR REZONING: Name: CITY OF LONCWONT Home Telephone 0: Address: 3rd Ave. & Kimbaxk St._ Bus. Telephone f: 776-6050 yONGMONT, CO 80501 Name: Rome Telephone 0: Address: Bus. Telephone f: Name: Rome Telephone 0: Address: Bun. Telephone 0: Applicant or Authorized Agent (if different than above): Name: Frederick Wilson, Mayor Home Telephone f: Address: Same__as above Bus. Telephone 8:_ See above Owner(s) and/or lessees of mineral rights on or under the subject properties of record in the Weld County Assessor's Office: Name: menrCl if f.-0/kJ&MOM t Address: 30 c ki#.AA"R‘c 1-o.ibn.-oNij co gore Name:_ Address: Nave: Address: I hereby depose and state under the penalties of perjury that all statements, proposals and/or plans submitted with or contained within this application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. COUNTY OF WELD ) STATE OF COLORADO ) Sig t re: Owner or Au"t'h razed Agent Subscribed and sworn to before me. this —ay of-712,44-64, ,19 922. SEAL _ NOTARY LIC 7frd.. Gam.— .qedeeuv/ '-?/uechic..//4 r- /3'?Z . (jir-shi ‘r, • 110 141 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES l PHONE(303)356-40M EXT.4400 91510O1 STREET GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 11 I ige, COLORADO March 29, 1990 Ms. Austin Buckingham Colorado Department of Health Hazardous Materials 6 Waste Management Division 4210 East IIth Avenue Denver, CO 80220 Re: Certificate of Designation application for a wastewater sludge composting facility located in part of the NE} of Section 8, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado Dear Mr. Buckingham: Enclosed are three (3) copies of a Certificate of Designation application submitted on behalf of the City of Longmont for a wastewater sludge composting facility. Please review this application and forward a recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners. Sincerely, Rod Allison Principal Planner RA:dn Enclosure SCC `>4 • • LEGAL DESCRIPTION CITY OF LONGMONT SLUDGE COMPOST FACILITY SITE A tract of land located in the Northeast Quarter of Section 8, Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado, being more particularly described as follows: Considering the East line of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 8 as bearing South 01°35' 58" East and with all bearings contained herein relative thereto: Commencing at the Northeast Corner of said Section 8; thence along the said East line, South 01°35 '58" East, 440.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing along said East line; South 01°35 ' 58" East, 872.74 feet; thence South 89°49'40" West, 562.45 feet; thence, North O1°35' 58" West, 784.67 feet; thence, North 68°24'03" East, 177. 75 feet to a point on a curve concaved to the South having a central angle of 20°00'00" , a radius of 220.00 feet and the chord of which bears North 78°24'03" East, 76.41 feet; thence along the arc of said curve 76. 79 feet; thence, North 88°24'03" East, 320.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. The above described tract contains 11 .000 acres and is subject to all easements and rights-of-way now on record or existing. QC`►+P94 evil"? 1.014C-MONT *Aide CNAUG" � OIS•tglC1-10 _ DlST2lC( N 86 24'03" E 37.0.00' Ce16.4i' '118'24: 03"E 4 �= 220.00' L-16.7119 FDUbiD Plrl A= ?A° 00' 00° sec. coel‘lee -4 w 1214, E65\11 S l a 2d' 03' it 11.000 ACZE9 L � r r r0 SEC. 8-Z-68 0 l'itt 400' • 562.45 o set dct KE6AL' 5 2R' 44'40" V/ w/l..5. 14823 CAP GEg2UAP1 2?, l9go • DESCRIPTION OF CITY OF LONGMONT COMPOST FACILITY SITE A tract of land located in tho Northeast Quarter of Section 8, Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M., Boulder County. Colorado, being more particularly described as follows: Considering the East line of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 8 as bearing South 01'35'58" East and with all bearings contained herein rela- tive thereto: Commencing at the Northeast Corner of said Section 8; thence along the said East line, South 01'35'58" East. 440.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing along said East line; South 01'35'58" East. 872.74 feet; thence, South 89'49'40" West, $62.45 feet; thence, North 01'35'58" West. 784,67 feet; thence, North 68.24'03" East, 177.75 feet to a point on a curve concaved to the South having a central angle of 20'00'00", a radius of 220.00 feet and the chord of which bears North 78'24'03" East, 76.41 feat; thence along the arc of said curve 76.79 feet; thence. North 88° 24'03" East, 320.00 feet to the Point of Beginning. The above described tract contains 11.000 acres and is subject to all ease- ments and rights-of-way now on record or existing. SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE: I hereby certify that this plat was 03ID 6/' prepared under my supervision; and that the same is correct to � , `!//,', the bast of my knowledge and belief. �Ca\5y Y Cs. co ca COLORADO FLS N0. ! AT3 PROPERTY OWNERS APPROVAL: I, City of Longmont , being �C OF CO\-010. •: the sole owner(s) in feo of the above described property, do ,•�� hereby request tha zoning as sho on attached map. /441---- Mayor The Lr go�igngg cortification vas acknowledged before at this /I —"AO "A G )9Z1414- A.D., 19917. Witness my hand and seal. My commission expires:791t.04,�.5 Notac�ipµblic PLANNING COMMISSION CERTIFICATION: This is to certify that the Weld County Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the Board of Commissioners, Weld County, Colorado for their confirmation, approval and adoption of this Zone Change as shown and described hereon this day of , 19_ Chairman, Planning Commission nom OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CERTIFICATION: This is to certify that the Board of County Commissioners, Weld County, Colorado do hereby confirm, approve and accept this Zone Change as shown and c�,lf,ogi"A!described hereon this day of 19„^ {{ .a ATTEST: County Clerk Chairman, Board of Co. Commissioners RECORDED: Deputy DATE: teomm.+9 C ewwm • REZONING APPLICATION • CITY OF LONGMONT NARRATIVE ATTACHMENT 1. PROJECT HISTORY AND DESCRIPTION In 1987 , the City of Longmont completed a major ($8 million) expansion of its wastewater treatment plant. Missing from this expansion were facilities for treatment and handling of sludge ("solids") . A decision on solids handling was delayed because the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the City were involved in a joint research project to evaluate innovative sludge treatment methods. When the final research data on these methods became available, the City initiated a study to compare them to other alternatives. This study, titled Solids Management Study, City of Longmont, was completed by Black and veatch Engineers in 1987. The findings of the study were that aerated static pile composting of sludge and land application of the compost were the most cost- effective and environmentally sound alternatives for wastewater solids handling. Since the City's intent was to apply for Federal funding to construct the recommended sludge treatment facilities, the study had to meet all Federal requirements for facilities planning defined in the Federal Clean Water Act. The study was approved by both the Colorado Department of Health and EPA in 1988 and design of the facilities was begun later that year. As part o£ the preliminary design work, some of the original study assumptions and costs were re-evaluated and refined. Several minor changes were then made to the original study and issued as an Addendum in 1989. These changes are discussed in more detail below. The Addendum was approved by the State and EPA in late 1989. A construction grant was also applied for and awarded in 1989. Bids on the project were opened in January and February of 1990 and award of construction contracts is currently pending EPA approval of the bidding documents. Since funding has been made available for the project, construction depends on County approval of rezoning of the property on which the composting facilities are to be located (discussed in more detail below) . A Certificate of Designation to allow waste processing facilities on the site will also need to be acquired. Construction of the project is scheduled to begin in late spring of 1990. A copy of the Solids Management Study and the addendum are enclosed as part of this application. The records of newspaper articles and public hearings on the facilities planning portion of the project are contained in the appendices to the study. One of the changes that occurred in preliminary design was location of the composting facilities. The original Solids Management Study recommended locating the composting operation on the City landfill property. However, investigations of the soil and fill depths at the landfill found that the site was unsuitable for the type of structures that were needed. In order to avoid the delays involved in re-opening the study and revising the environmental assessment, other sites in close proximity to the original were examined. The land immediately north of the landfill was found to be available and weld County Rezoning Application Narrative Attachment Page 2 • was purchased by the City. The specific piece of property is part of the area known as the Baldridge/Richardson PUD. The City has purchased 11 acres in the southeast corner of the POD. We have been working with the owner of the property for almost a year and have demonstrated to his satisfaction that the composting project will be in harmony with the proposed land uses on the remainder o£ his PUD. However, since the land is currently zoned for industrial/commercial development, it must be rezoned to agricultural in order to allow the proposed use. The purchase contract, a copy of which is attached, contains the condition that the final purchase of the land is subject to approval of rezoning by Weld County. A brief description of the composting project may also be helpful to you in the review of this rezoning request. The project will be made up of facilities located both at the existing wastewater treatment plant and at the subject property. The initial step in the composting process will be dewatering of waste sludge at the wastewater plant. The dewatered sludge will then be transported by truck to the composting project site. At that location, it will be mixed with an organic amendment such as finished compost, composted organic material or wood chips and placed into five foot high piles for composting. Both the mixing and composting/curing buildings are completely enclosed to insure the proper conditions for composting and the ability to control all of the operation. The composting process will be accelerated by forced aeration supplied to the piles via blowers and perforated pipe. This initial composting period will last for 28-30 days. Finished compost will then be placed in curing piles and aerated at a lower rate for 30-60 days. Both the composting and curing operations will be operated using micro- processor control of aeration rates to guarantee rapid stabilization of the sludge. The final product will be taken to the City's existing State-approved land application sites in Boulder County or used as a revegetation amendment on the existing landfill, which will close in 1990. Odor control and mitigation has been a primary concern of the City throughout planning and design of the project. The facilities contain several features to address this concern. Since mixing the sludge with amendment will be a primary source of any odors, the mixing building air will be separately vented through an organic/ soil scrubber. In the composting/curing building, odor control will be provided by large, roof-mounted updraft ventilator fans to provide high ventilation rates and disperse and dilute any odors into the atmosphere. If additional odor control is found to be necessary in the future, the building ventilation systems are designed to allow the addition of air scrubbers. With respect to physical appearance, the buildings themselves will be metal warehouse-style structures and the site will be bermed and landscaped to screen the buildings from the rest of the POD and from Highway 119. One of the primary directives in the design of the facilities was to make them compatible with the existing and proposed land uses in the area. Weld County Rezoning Application Narrative Attachme. • Page 3 2. CONSISTENCY WITH POLICIES OF WELD COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The rezoning is consistent with and meets several of the policies of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. First, the use o£ the site for a composting facility is for the benefit o£ agricultural land. The compost product is to be used as a soil amendment either on the existing landfill to enhance revegetation or on State-approved agricultural sites as a soil amendment. Although the approved application sites are currently in Boulder County, weld County agricultural land could be used in the future. The composting facilities also meet the goal of permitting commercial and industrial uses of agricultural property at locations along highways with adequate access. The composting site is in an approved industrial/commercial (I-1 and C-2 zoning) PUD which has already been removed from agricultural uses; this rezoning will return a portion to the previous zoning classification, but with uses which remain compatible with the PUD. Adequate access is provided by the current landfill access road, which will be used for the proposed facilities. We intend to slightly widen and pave the road as part o£ this project. This road will eventually be further upgraded to serve as an alternate entrance to the adjacent PUD. As explained in the following paragraph, rezoning of the site is also compatible with the projected uses of the area as a commercial/industrial development zone between Longmont and Del Camino. 3. COMPATIBILITY OF PROPOSED USES WITH SURROUNDING LAND The uses of the rezoned property will be compatible with the approved land uses in the existing PUD, which is zoned industrial/ commercial. The sludge composting operation will be totally enclosed and will physically resemble a large warehouse structure. The site will be bermed and landscaped to provide a buffer between the facilities and the other PUD lots. The berms will also provide a visual screen to keep the buildings from being seen from Highway 119. Operator activity at the site will be limited to 8 hours per day, 5 days per week. Traffic to the site will consist of the operators ' private vehicles (4 or 5 per day) and 5 single-axle (3 to 5 cubic yard) dump trucks per day. The ultimate utilization of the . facilities, which is projected for the year 2010, would result in traffic loads of 5 private vehicles and 12 to 15 trucks per day. The access road for this facility will be out of the PUD corridor and will utilize the rpadway that already exists to serve the Longmont City landfill. Other industrial or light industrial uses in the area would have buildings of similar appearance and would probably have a much higher number of employees per acre of development with correspondingly higher traffic impacts. Even if the PUD would develop with commercial users, the composting facilities will still generate lower traffic, noise and visual impacts, as exemplified by other commercial ventures in the Highway 119 corridor. There may be some concerns about odors generated by the facilities and the impact on the surrounding land uses. As explained above, the design of the facilities has taken this into account from the beginning. The most odorous part of the operation, mixing of sludge with composting amendment, will be ventilated through a biological soil scrubber, which should eliminate any odors from this source. Although the active composting portion of the project will be totally aerobic, which should minimize offensive odors, the composting building has also been designed to prevent such problems. The composting operation itself will be totally eiC C'n Weld County Rezoning Application Narrative Attachmeli, • Page 4 enclosed and will be actively ventilated by large updraft fans in the roof. This will insure positive mixing and dispersion of building air into the atmosphere even during stagnant weather conditions. Also, this site was chosen in part to take advantage of prevailing winds and air movement which will tend to dilute and disperse any odors quickly. The odors associated with the composting operation are expected to be far less noticeable than many agricultural activities. Since the process is totally enclosed and controlled and the ventilation at critical points is scrubbed, there should be no detriment to the proposed land uses in the remainder of the PUD. All property in the vicinity of the subject parcel is zoned Agricultural except for the Baldridge/Richardson PUD, a portion of which this rezoning request addresses. Although the composting facilities will be a special use within the proposed agricultural zoning, the mitigation for both visual and odor impacts described above should prevent any negative impacts on the surrounding land uses. 4. AVAILABILITY OF WATER AND SEWER UTILITIES The water system will be provided by Left Hand water company. water will only be used in the operations building. Sewer service for the facilities will be provided by the St. Vrain Sanitation District. The only source of sewage will be the operations building. Although Left Hand indicates that they do not have adequate pressure to serve the operations building, they have left open the possibility of the use of a holding tank or cistern which would be filled during low- use hours. The City has planned for the installation of a tank in the operations building, and if Left Hand can not deliver the water the City will deliver bulk water to the site by truck as needed. Letters from both of the utilities regarding service are attached. 5. SOIL SURVEY A soil survey of the site was prepared for this project by Empire Labs, Inc. A copy is attached. No limitations were found for construction of the proposed facilities. 6. ROAD AND HIGHWAY ACCESS The existing landfill access road is adequate for the proposed zoning and use of the property. The road will be widened from 24 ft. to 28 ft. , regraded and paved as part of the construction o£ the composting facilities. The City has an access easement from Highway 119 to the City landfill which will be maintained to serve this project. 7. SAND, GRAVEL AND MINERAL RESOURCES No mineral resources have been found under the property. 8. FLOOD PLAIN, GEOLOGIC HAZARD, OVERLAY AREA The property is not located in a flood plain, area of geologic hazard or any weld County overlay area. 9. PROOF OF APPLICANT'S INTEREST IN PROPERTY A copy of the signed purchase contract for the property is attached. The purchase is contingent on rezoning by the County. nAr•:,v., ±,z weld County Rezoning Application Narrative Attachment • Page 5 11. OWNERS OF ADJACENT PROPERTY A certified list of property owners within 500 feet of the subject property is attached. 12. OWNERS/LESSEES OF MINERAL RIGHTS There are no owners or lessees of mineral rights on the subject property. 13. VICINITY AND LAND USE MAP A vicinity and land use map for the subject property is attached. 14. REZONING PLAT A rezoning plat in conformance with County requirements is attached. • SCOSO4 • • i i CONTRACT TO BUY AND SELL VACANT PROPERTY THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 19th day of February , 1990, by and between Cordell P. Richardson, 1431 Elmhurst Lane, Longmont, Colorado 80501, hereinafter referred to as Seller, and the City of Longmont, Colorado, hereinafter referred to as Purchaser. The Purchaser hereby agrees to buy the herein described real property and Seller hereby agrees to sell the hereinafter described real property upon the terms and conditions stated herein, to wit: A tract of land located in the Northeast Quarter of Section 8, ' Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.H., Weld County, Colorado, being more particularly described as follows: Considering the East line of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 8 as bearing South 01° 35'58" East and with all bearing contained herein relative thereto: Commencing at the Northeast Corner of said Section 8; thence along the said East line, South 01 35'58" East, 440.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing along said East line; South 01 35'58" 872.74 feet; thence South 89 49'40" West, 562.45 feet; thence North 01 35'58" West, 784.67 feet; thence, North 68 24'03" East, 177.75 feet to a point on a curve concaved to the South having a central angle of 20 00'00", a radius of 220.00 feet and the chord of which bears North 78 24'03" East, 76.40 feet; thence along the I arc of said curve 76.79 feet; thence North 88 24'03" East, 320.00 feet to the Point of Beginning. The above described tract contains 11.000 acres and is subject to all easements and rights-o£-way now on record or existing. Together with all easements and rights-of-way pertinent thereto, all improvements thereon and all fixtures of a permanent nature currently upon the ' premises except as hereinafter provided, in their present condition, all ordinary wear and tear excepted, hereinafter called the Property. The purchase price shall be One hundred and thirty-two thousand ($132,000.00) dollars, payable as follows: 1. 5132,000.00 will be paid by the Purchaser to the Seller at the time of closing, plus an additional adjustment for growing crops, if any, at the time of closing. Purchaser agrees that, in the event the subject real property will not be developed during the 1990 growing season, it will lease the real property to the current farmer. In such event, Purchaser shall reimburse farmer for reasonable planting preparations which were completed prior to sale, not to exceed $ 250.00 . This covenant shall survive closing. • r. C is Contract to Buy and Sell Vacant Property February 15, 1990 2. An abstract of title to the Property, certified to date, or a current commitment for title insurance policy in an amount equal to the purchase price, at Sellers option and expense, shall be furnished to Purchaser on or before the date o£ closing. If Seller elects to furnish the title insurance commitment, Seller will deliver the title insurance policy to the Purchaser after closing and pay the premium thereof. 3. Title shall be merchantable in the Seller, except as stated in this Agreement. Subject to the payment or tender as above provided and compliance by Purchaser with other terms and provisions hereof, Seller shall execute and deliver a sufficient Warranty Deed to Purchaser on the 9th day of March, 1990 at the hour of 2:00 p.m. at the offices of the City Attorney, 408 3rd Avenue, Longmont, Colorado, or, by mutual agreement at some other date and time, conveying the property free and clear of all taxes, liens, and encumbrances. 4. If the title is not merchantable, and written notice of defects is given by Purchaser or Purchaser's agent to Seller or Seller's agent on or before the date of closing, Seller shall use reasonable effort to correct said defects prior to the date of closing. If Seller is unable to correct the defects on or before the date of closing, at Seller's option and upon written notice to Purchaser or Purchaser's agent on or before the date of closing, the date o£ closing shall be extended 30 days for the purpose of correcting said defects. If title is not rendered merchantable as provided herein, at Purchaser's option, this contract shall be void and have no effect and each party hereto shall be released from all obligations hereunder. 5. Any encumbrances required to be paid may be paid at the time of settlement from the proceeds of this transaction or from any other source. s 6. General taxes for the year o£ closing, based upon the most recent levy and assessment, in entrance on encumbrances, if any, shall be apportioned at the date of delivery of the Deed. 7. Possession of the Property shall be delivered to Purchaser on the Date of Closing. In the event that the Property is substantially damaged by fire, flood, or other casualty before the date o£ this contract and the date of delivery of Deed, Purchaser may elect to terminate this contract. 8. This contract is contingent upon the Seller, the Seller's agent, the Purchaser, or the Purchaser's agent obtaining a rezoning of the property to an agricultural zoning by the County Commissioners of Weld County, Coloradolat purchaser's cost and expense. 2 CS' Contract to Buy and Sell Vacant Property February 15, 1990 9. All terms and conditions with respect to this offer are expressly contained herein and the Seller agrees that no representative or agent of the Purchaser has made any representation or promise with respect to this offer not expressly contained herein. The word Seller as used herein j shall include the plural number, and where more than one Seller signs the offer, all shall be bound by the terms hereof. 10. From and after the date of execution o£ this offer by the Seller, the Seller agrees to permit the Purchaser, its duly authorized agents, employees, contractors or representatives to enter upon the land at any time for the purpose of making or drilling test borings, making load tests, topographical, property line and utility surveys and appraisals. 11. Time is o£ the essence hereof. If any obligation hereunder is not performed as herein provided, this contract shall be null and void. 12. If this proposal is accepted by Seller, by signing a copy of this Agreement.on or before February 10, 1990, and by the execution of a copy of this Agreement by the Mayor of the City of Longmont on or before February 28, 1990, this instrument shall become a contract between the Seller and the Purchaser, and shall inure to the benefit of the heirs, successors, and assigns of such parties. 13. ' Purchaser shall utilize its best efforts to locate any new structures in the southeast corner of the real property in recognition of Seller's adjacent property. Purchaser agrees to cooperate with the Seller and the St. Vrain Sanitation District for the location of joint sewer lines so as not to prevent service to adjacent p 7 property. This covenant shall survive closing. 14. Purchaser shall not deny access to any roads shown on the KID plan approved by Weld County for property adjacent to the purchased parcel. 1 This covenant shall survive closing. CITY OF LONGMONT, COLORADO r MAYOR ATTEST: CITY CLERK 3 ' • • Contract to Buy and Sell Vacant Property February 15, 1990 APPROVED AS TO FORM: RAD D. BAILEY Rdy DEPUTY CITY ATTO SELLER CORDELL P. RICHARDSON STATE OF COLORADO ) COUNTY OF ) ss. Subscribed and sworn to before me by Cordell P. Richardson this 19th day of February , 1990. My Commission expires January 17.1993 y� Marvin L. Dr— Notary Public 4 2CC SO • Colorado Escrow O03)678 4.500 Services, Inc. 520 Mem SMUT.Su1rE C • LONOMONr,CO 40507 • METRO 003)5344009 STATEMENT OF SETTLEMENT SELLER'S O PURCHASER'S gm PROPERTY ADDRESS A SER C. P. RICHARDS0N PURCHASER THE CITY OF LONGMONT, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION SETTLEMENTDATF March 9, 1990 DATE OF PRORATION March 8, 1990 GAL DESCRIPTION d See Schedule A, 05, Longmont Title Insurance Commitment 014974 Debit en lt 1. Selling Price 1132.000; 00 I 2. Deposit.paid to 1 3. Trust Deed,payable to '� 4. �usL5eed,payable to I I 11 '—I 6. Trust oe_payoff to I I it I — 6. Interest ota an Assumed I ! is 7. Title La Premium I I; I 8. Abstracting: Before Sale t I 9. After Sale I II i 0. Title Exam.by I I li 1 Recording: Warranty Deed I 101 00 11 Trust Deed I I 11- 1 3. Releaae I I II i 4. Other • 1 1 II 6. Documentary Fee 131 20 N + 6. Certificate of Taxes Due I 10 00 1' t 7. Taxes for Preceding Year(s) 1989 t II I 8. Taxes for Current7ritar ($140.27) 67 days @ 5.3843 I I li 25175 9. Tax Reserve I I 1• I O. Special xaxea I I 1; I L Personal Property Taxes I I r t I I II 1 Hazard Ins.Prem.Assumed—Policy No. Co. I I II 'T— S Yr.Term Expires I 1 11 1 Premium$ Days Unused at 4 per day I I it - 1 . Premium for New Insurance 1 � 1 erve 1 I I FHA Mortgage Ins.Assumed I I i ____-- 6. FHA Mortgage Ins.Reserve I I II I . Loan—rerv)a Fee Guyer) I I II I Loan Discount Fee (Seller) I I 1 i . Interest on New Loan I I 1 i O. Survey and/or Credit Report I II I L A007513al Fee I II I Water and/or Sewer I 1 1[ • Rents I I II I Security Deposita. I 1 II f . Loan Transfer Fee I I IL I 6. Loan Payment Due I 1 r I . Broker✓a Fee I I I 8. Closing Fee 1 32150 I I _ 9. Reimbursement to Dennis Gould for plowing 1,8100 I j j I II 1 I I I 1 1 I ub Totals 1132,263 170 2 7 &lance due to/from Seller t alw *Winm I ce due tldyf:ro Buyer i I!1 CYDALS 1132,263 170 1 132.7263I 70 e above filmes do not include sales or use taxes on personal property APPROVED and ACCEPTED COLORADO ESCROW SERVICES, INC. AS AGENT FOl haler/SAC THE CITY OF LONGMONT, A SSUNICIPAL Broker DYER REALTY, INC.4 CO ORAT N Bit: „e rchaserX$i T1V ' '�_ /,/ - -- BY -U� -� REPORT OF A GEOTECRNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR CITY OF LONGMONT'S COMPOSTING FACILITY WELD COUNTY, COLORADO ` CAMP, DRESSER & MCKEE INC. DENVER, COLORADO PROJECT N0. 1453--L^89 BY EMPIRE LABORATORIES, INC. 1242 Bramwood P1 . , P.O. Box 1135 Longmont, Colorado 80501 ec os-,„ • TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents i Letter of Transmittal Report 1 Appendix A A-1 Test Boring Location Plan . A-2 Key to Borings A-3 Log of Borings A-4 Appendix B B-1 Consolidation Test Results. . B-2 Summary of Test Results . . . B-3 Appendix C C-1 i • Empire Lftoratories, Inc. P.O.Box GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING 6 MATERIALS TESTING 301 No.Howes a Fon Collins,Gdora0o 80522 April 13, 1989 Camp, Dresser & McKee Inc. 2300 15th Street, Suite 400 Denver, CO 80202 Attention: Mr. Jose Valazguez Gentlemen: We are pleased to submit our Report of a Geotechnical Investigation for the proposed Composting Facility to be located on Highway 119 in Weld County, Colorado. Based upon the findings of our subsurface investigation, it is our opinion that this site is suitable for the proposed con- struction, providing the design criteria and recommendations set forth in this report are met. The accompanying report presents the results of our subsurface investigation and our recommendations based on the results . Very truly yours, EMPIRE LABORATORIES, INC. r� t /..g. y t''. A ,J 7 ES11 . Pa& X51,.;,.: p ` _ till Edward J. Paas, P.E. iMi`.;,J :w Longmont Branch Manager \%,.:J,'.. .�fl- - L, ea •- Revvi/ieew�wed by: / `";;; .' ' "•;`:" m---czeo+4 Chester C. Smith, P.E. __ ,p _ _ President 4808 E /PJk 0 d,N$ti `ar*et 41, lq Oic s .05 cst el gttrtop41g11COtti p\``` ii 44, In BrarlcnOr6cea I• P,O.Box 16059 P.O.eoy/175 P.O.B0a 1744 P.O.Bo.5659 ColOre00 Soon g&CO 00975 L 1� 0 orlpm0n4 CO80502 Greeley,CO80832 Gneyeene,WY 82003 (719)597.2118 (303)778-3921 (307)351-0180 (707)872-9221 !• ,P./ t 1 Member of Consulting Enoineers Council REPORT OF A GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION 1 SCOPE This report presents the results of a Geotechnical Investigation for the proposed composting facility to be located on Highway 119 in Weld County, Colorado. The investigation was carried out by means of test borings and laboratory testing of samples obtained from these borings. i SITE INVESTIGATION The field investigation, carried out on March 31 , 1989 consisted of drilling, logging and sampling thirteen ( 13) test borings. The locations of the test borings are shown on the Test Boring Location Plan included in Appendix A of this report . Boring logs prepared from the field logs are also presented in Appendix A. These logs illustrate the soils encountered, depth of sampling and elevations of subsurface groundwater at the time of our investigation. All borings were advanced with a four-inch diameter, contin- uous-type, power-flight auger. The test borings were drilled to depths of ten ( 10) to fifteen (15) feet. The drilling opera- tions were performed under the supervision of a geotechnical engineer from Empire Laboratories, Inc. , who made a continuous visual observation of the soils encountered. 1 vciorn 7Z • i SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION This site is located on the south side of Highway 119 in Weld County, Colorado. More particularly, this site may be described as a tract of land situated in the Northeast 1/4 of Section 8, Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the Sixth P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. This site is bordered on the south by the Longmont landfill. A commercial building exists north of the site. This property is open, agricultural land which was cultivated at the time of our investigation. This property slopes moderately downward toward the north for good positive drainage. LABORATORY TESTS AND EXAMINATIONS Laboratory testing and examination were performed on samples obtained from the test borings in order to determine the physical characteristics of the soils encountered. Moisture contents, dry unit weights, unconfined compressive strengths, water soluble sulfates, swelling potentials and Atterberg limits were deter- mined. A summary of the test results is included In Appendix B of this report. Swell consolidation characteristics were also determined, and curves showing this data are also included in Appendix B. SOIL AND GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS The soil profile at the site consists of strata of materials 2 rv � � . 0 0 arranged in different combinations. In order of increasing depth, they are as follows: ( 1 ) Topsoil : The site is overlain by a layer of silty topsoil approximately one ( 1) foot thick. The upper four (4) to six (6) inches of topsoil has been penetrated by root growth and organic matter and should not be used as back- fill or foundation bearing. ( 2) Sandy Silty Clay: Light brown sandy silty clay underlies the topsoil and extends to the underlying bedrock at depths of three (3) to even (7) feet. This clay stratum exhibits low bearing characteristics. I (3) Siltstone Sandstone Claystone Bedrock: Siltstone sandstone Claystone bedrock exists beneath the clay stratum at depths of three (3) to seven (7) feet and extends to the depths explored. This bedrock stratum contains intermittant layers of siltstone sandstone and Claystone. The upper one ( 1 ) to four (4) feet of bedrock is weathered. The firm bedrock exhibits high bearing characteristics and the siltstone Claystone bedrock exhibits moderate swell potential . (4) Groundwater: At the time of our investigation, no free groundwater was encountered to the depths explored. Water levels in this area are subject to change due to seasonal variations and irrigation demands. In addition, surface water may percolate through the upper subsoils 3 � �) "�J. • • and become trapped on the relatively impervious bedrock stratum, forming a perched water condition. RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISCUSSION It is our understanding that the proposed composting facility will consist of a large composting curing building, a storage building, a mixing building, an operations building and a surface storm water containment and evaporation area. We further understand that the area of the composting curing building will be land balanced by cutting four (4) to five (5) feet from the southwest corner of the proposed building area and filling as much as four (4) feet 1n the proposed northeast corner of the facility. The composting and curing building, mixing building and storage buildings are to be constructed with asphalt pavement floor slabs. The operations building will be constructed with a concrete slab on grade. It is our under- standing that the proposed detention pond will be four (4) to five (5) feet deep. Site Grading ' It is recommended that the topsoil containing roots and organic matter, which extends to a depth of approximately four (4) to six (6) inches, be removed from the area of the proposed buildings. This topsoil should be stockpiled for future land- scaping use. The subgrade should then be scarified to a depth of six (6) inches and recompacted two percent (2%) above optimum 4 r • ? .. _ moisture to ninety percent (90%) of Standard Proctor Density ASTM D 698-78. (See Appendix C. ) On--site soils or granular soils approved by the geotech- nical engineer are suitable for use as fill in the proposed building areas. It is recommended that the siltstone claystone bedrock not be used as fill in proposed building areas due to its swell potential. All fill underlying the building areas should be placed in layers not exceeding eight (8) inches in thickness and compacted two percent (2%) above optimum moisture to a minimum of ninety-five percent (95%) of Standard Proctor Density ASTM D 698-78. All fill should be inspected by the geotechnical engineer, and field density tests should be taken under the supervision of the geotechnical engineer to verify that the specified com- paction requirements are attained in the field. The soils in the area of the proposed detention pond are relatively impermeable to depths of four (4) to five (5) feet . A relatively permeable siltstone sandstone bedrock or sandy silt exists at depths of four (4) to five (5) feet and lower in the area of the proposed detention pond. Cuts and fills for the proposed detention ponds should be placed on slopes no steeper than 3: 1 . Cut areas in the detention pond founded in the upper clay soils should be scarified a minimum of eight (8) inches and compacted at or near optimum moisture to a minimum of ninety-five percent (95%) of Standard Proctor Density ASTM D 698-78. Where the bottom or sides of the detention ponds 5 9COS'M - 41 • are founded within the siltstone sandstone or sandy silt, the pond bottom and sides should be overexcavated a minimum of one ( 1) foot. The overexcavated areas should be backfilled with the on-site clays or imported clay materials approved by the geotechnical engineer. The clay should be placed in uniform six (6) to eight (8) inch lifts and compacted at or wet of optimum moisture to a minimum of ninety-five percent (95%) of Standard Proctor Density ASTM D 698-78. Berms surrounding the proposed detention pond should be constructed with the on-site clays or imported clay materials. Embankment fill should be placed in uniform six (6) to eight (8) inch lifts and compacted at or wet of optimum moisture to a minimum of ninety-five percent (95%) of Standard Proctor Density ASTM D 698-78. To minimize erosion, the slopes and bottom of the detention pond should be seeded. Pipes or apertures through the detention pond should be surrounded by a minimum of two (2) feet of the on-site clay soil compacted to a minimum of one hundred percent ( 100%) of Standard Proctor Density ASTM D 698-78. Foundations Based on the swelling potentials of the bedrock at this site and the magnitude of the loads transmitted by the structures, it is our opinion that these structures should be supported by drilled pier foundation systems. It is recommended that piers be drilled into the bedrock stratum and that structural grade beams span the piers. These piers would support the structure through friction and end bearing. The piers should be straight- 6 0C��?� • • shaft and should be drilled with plumb tolerances of one and one-half percent ( 1 1/2%) relative to the length of the pier. All piers should have minimum ten ( 10) foot lengths. They should be drilled a minimum depth of three (3) feet into the firm bedrock stratum and when founded at this level may be designed for a maximum allowable end bearing pressure of fifteen thousand ( 15,000) pounds per square foot. It is estimated that a skin friction of one thousand five hundred ( 1 ,500) pounds per square foot will be developed for that portion of the pier embedded more than three (3) feet into the firm bedrock stratum. We recommend that piers be designed for a minimum dead load of five thousand ( 5,000) pounds per square foot to counteract swelling pressures which will develop if the subsoils become wetted. Skin friction from additional embeddment into the firm bedrock may be used to resist uplift if necessary. To help provide the required skin friction, the sides of the pier drilled into the bedrock stratum should be roughened. All piers should be reinforced for their full length to resist tensile stress created by swelling pressures acting on the pier. It is recom- mended that piers be a minimum of twelve ( 12) inches in diameter to facilitate cleaning, dewatering and inspection. All grade beams must have a minimum four (4) inch void between the bottom of the beam and the underlying soil . It is strongly recommended that the geotechnical engineer be present during the drilling operations to; ( 1 ) identify the firm bedrock stratum, (2) assure that proper penetation 7 eces into sound bedrock is obtained, (3) ascertain that all drill holes are thoroughly cleaned and dewatered prior to placement of any foundation concrete, (4) check all drill holes to assure that they are plumb and of the proper diameter, and (5) insure proper placement of concrete and reinforcment. All excavations should be dug on safe and stable slopes. It is suggested that excavated slopes be on minimum grades of 1-1/2: 1 or flatter. The slope of the sides of the excavations should comply with local codes or OSHA regulations. Where this is not practical, sheeting, shoring and/or bracing of the excavation will be required. The sheeting, shoring and bracing of the excavation should be done to prevent sliding or caving of the excavation walls and to protect construction workers and adjacent structures. The side slopes of the excavation or sheeting, shoring or bracing should be maintained under safe conditions until completion of the backfilling. In addition. heavy construction equipment should be kept a safe distance from the edge of the excavation. Slabs on Grade The subgrade beneath slabs on grade should be prepared as described in the "Site Grading" section of this report. We recommend that the floor slabs be placed a minimum of three (3) feet above the bedrock stratum. It is recommended that a four (4) inch layer of clean gravel or crushed rock devoid of fines be placed beneath floor slabs. This material will help to distribute the floor loads and will act as a capillary 8 eCe8FM • • break. It is suggested that all slabs on grade be designed structurally independent of all bearing members. It should be noted that the bedrock at this site is expansive, if this bedrock below slabs on grade becomes wetted, movement of the slabs on grade may occur. If building construction is performed during winter months, it is recommended that slabs on grade not be placed on frozen ground and that they be protected from freezing temperatures until they are properly cured. All slabs on grade should be designed for the imposed loading. In order to minimize and control shrinkage cracks which develop in slabs on grade, it is suggested that control joints be placed every fifteen ( 15) to twenty ( 20) feet and that the total area contained within these joints be no greater than four hundred (400) square feet . Flexible Floor Slabs & Pavement It is our understanding that approximately fifteen ( 15) single axle dump trucks with five (5) to six (6) ton loads will use the drive areas at this site each day. We further understand that a loader will transport material from the mixing building into the composting building each day. Based on the proposed cuts in the area of the composting and curing building and drive areas the flexible pavement at this site will be placed on expansive bedrock in some areas. It is suggested that in areas where the pavement sections are on or within two ( 2) feet of the bedrock stratum that this 9 53COS74 • • subgrade be treated with fly ash, kiln dust or lime to reduce the swell potential of the subgrade soil . It is recommended that a ten percent mixture of kiln dust or fly ash or a four percent mixture of lime be disked a minimum of six (6) inches into the expansive bedrock. The subgrade should then be recompacted two percent (2%) above optimum moisture to a minimum of ninety percent (90X) of Standard Proctor Density ASTM D 698-78 . The subgrade in all other areas should be scarified to a depth of six (6) inches and recompacted two percent (2%) above optimum moisture to a minimum of ninety percent (90%) of Standard Proctor Density ASTM D 698-78. Samples of the upper soils were classified for the purpose of determining pavement design criteria. The soils tested for Atterberg limits had group indecies of six (6) to nine (9) . Based on these values, we recommend the following pavement thicknesses for the proposed drives, floor slabs and parking areas : Drives & Areas Receiving Floor Truck Traffic _Slabs Parking Asphaltic Concrete 3" 3" 2 1/2" Select Gravel Base Course 10" 8" 6" Total Pavement Thickness 13" 11" 8 1/2" A feasible full depth asphalt alternate would be as follows: Drives & Areas Receiving Floor Truck Traffic Slabs_ Parking Asphaltic Concrete Surfacing 2" 2" 2" Asphaltic Treated Base 4 1 2" 4" 3_" Total Pavement Thickness 6 1/2" 6" 5" 10 riC43A7it • • All topsoil and other unsuitable materials should be stripped and removed from the proposed paving areas prior to placing any fill materials or base course. We recommend that a soil sterilant be used beneath pavement to retard weed growth. The base course overlying the subgrade should consist of a hard, durable, crushed rock or stone and filler and should have a minimum "R" value of 80. The composite base course material should be free from vegetable matter and lumps or balls of clay, and should meet Colorado Department of Highway Class 6 specifications as follows: Sieve Size % Passing 3/4" 100 #4 30-65 #8 25-55 #200 3-12 Liquid Limit 30 Maximum Plasticity Index . . 6 Maximum The base course and any :ill required beneath pavement areas should be placed at or near optimum moisture and compacted to at least ninety-five percent (95%) of Standard Proctor Density ASTM D 698-78. The base course must be shaped to grade so that proper drainage of the drive areas in obtained. Dewatering No free groundwater was encountered at the time of our investigation, however, a potential perched water table problem does exist on this site due to the high bedrock stratum. Therefore, it is recommended that a perimeter drain be constructed around the proposed buildings which are constructed 11 v0A 00Da':2 • • within three (3) feet of the bedrock stratum. The dewatering system should consist of four (4) inch diameter perforated pipe, a sump and pump or other suitable drain outlet. The perforated pipe should be placed around the entire perimeter of the buildings. These drains must be placed at least one ( 1) foot below the finished lower level slabs and should have a minimum grade of one-eighth ( 1/8) inch per foot. Two (2) inches of three-quarter (3/4) inch crushed rock should extend below the pipe. This gravel should extend to within one ( 1) foot of the ground surface. It is recommended that building paper or straw be placed over the gravel to prevent clogging of the gravel media. Clay backfill should be used over the building paper to prevent surface water from entering the system. The drains should flow to a sump or by gravity to a suitable discharge area. The sump, if used, should be at least three (3) feet below the finished floor system and should have at least one ( 1 ) foot of gravel around and below the sump. A pump adequate to discharge flows should be installed in the sump. GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS ( 1 ) Laboratory test results indicated that water soluble II sulfates in the soil are negligble, and a Type I/II cement may be used in concrete exposed to subsoils. Slabs on grade subjected to de-icing chemicals should have low water-cement ratios and higher air contents. 12 sco•s_'m (2) Finished grade should be sloped away from the structures on all sides to give positive drainage. Ten percent ( 10%) for the first ten (10) feet away from the structures is the suggested slope. (3) Backfill around the outside perimeter of the structures i should be mechanically compacted at optimum moisture to at least ninety percent (90%) of Standard Proctor Density ASTM D 698-78. (See Appendix C. ) Puddling should not be permitted as a method of compaction. (4) All plumbing and utility trenches underlying slabs and paved areas should be backfilled with an approved material compacted to at least ninety-five percent (95%) of Standard Proctor Density ASTM D 698-78. Puddling should not be permitted as a method of compaction. (5) Gutters and downspouts should be designed to carry roof runoff water well beyond the backfill area. (6) Underground sprinkling systems should be designed such that piping is placed a minimum of five (5) feet outside the backfill of the structure, heads should be designed so that irrigation water is not sprayed onto the found- ation walls. These recommendations should be taken into account in the landscape planning. (7) Footing sizes should be proportioned to equalize the unit loads applied to the soil and thus minimize differen- tial settlements. 13 SCOSOl M • (8) Plumbing under slabs on grade should be eliminated wherever possible since plumbing failures are quite frequently the source of free water which causes slab heave. (9) It is recommended that all compaction requirements speci- fied herein be verified in the field with density tests performed under the supervision of a geotechnical engineer. ( 10) It is recommended that a registered professional engineer design the substructures and that he take into account the findings and recommendations of this report. GENERAL COMMENTS This report has been prepared to aid in the evaluation of the property and to assist the architect and/or engineer in the design of this project . In the event that any changes in the design of the structures or their locations are planned, the conclusions and recommendations contained in this report will not be considered valid unless said changes are reviewed and conclusions of this report modified or approved in writing by Empire Laboratories, Inc. , the geotechnical engineer of record. Every effort was made to provide comprehensive site coverage through careful locations of the test borings, while keeping the site investigation economically feasible. Variations in soil and groundwater conditions between test borings may be encoun- tered during construction. In order to permit correlation between the reported subsurface conditions and the actual 14 SCOS?ri conditions encountered during construction and to aid in carrying out the plans and specifications as originally contemplated, it is recommended that Empire Laboratories, Inc. , be retained i to perform continuous review during the excavation and foundation phases of the work. Empire Laboratories, Inc. assumes no responsibility for compliance with the recommendations included I in this report unless they have been retained to perform adequate on-site construction review during the course of construction. 15 ge2C®�y?! % APPENDIX A. �cett ih,4.. . ® e TEST BORING LOCATION PLAN e I ,h`I YY 1 5am-G S 9" we I 1001�_ tala rAtuMEarr # Evan 77 a 1 � _ NR 1Z 0 - 15 1 ■ 1 J a, Na7 Nall ' -0 0 0 campa6 INGr/G thz-5 N6r , /5LOfX. ,I Y; 1 , , i a _0. .4:15- 0 1 Z' -7.7 NA 6 N'D,1Q 1 I 1 , t ' A4PHAL-Y PAN/Imer tryr) l , I 1 1 1 .r'rox .4ro 1 i ( 1,474* NO.5 n_Wck r I MIxJN ).16A 1 ,1 LLD' ., _&A 9 , l il �� i� / • __ OPER-471014 #1 i' e.' . 55-Fer. 1 1 rrr ----- i- ✓Olj®8 .74 ', 4.---e Y Y EMPIRE IADORATORIES, INC. I • KEY TO BORING LOGS • r9 TOPSOIL ggg GRAVEL FILL SAND& GRAVEL Mae e ••• � SILT •/•' SILTY SAND&GRAVEL • • r_i CLAYEY SILT COBBLES �ie' SANDY SILT •�, •� SAND,GRAVEL&COBBLES CLAY MEMO s WEATHERED BEDROCK SILTY CLAY Q SILTSTONE BEDROCK orm • [22 SANDY CLAY � CLAYSTONE BEDROCK SAND ••• SANDSTONE BEDROCK '•�� SILTY SAND MINN ��j LIMESTONE CLAYEY SAND,02 pz GRANITE r- SANDY SILTY CLAY 1 SHELBY TUBE SAMPLE STANDARD PENETRATION DRIVE SAMPLER WATER TABLE 1 week AFTER DRILLING c HOLE CAVED 5/12 Indicates that 5 blows or a 110 pound hammer falling 30 Inches was required to penetrate 12'oche,. A-3 5,,TOS?� EMPIRE LABORATORIES,INC. • • LOG OF BORINGS ate VA-riot-1 110.1 1402 1.10.3 1404 4920 5/12 T ;.- - 0 Y 4915 4/12 ! -c , . . 8/12 �y ! - n .� / .,. �. . i � • 4910 SO/6 --- .� 4/12 4.: • so/1z�-- z/1z ::' f ,..•--- --- r 4905 -" --- - "- 38112 - 50/5 -- - -- 50/12 g- --- 50/6 *-- -- .._.:.i 4900 - -- . . 50/9 1- 50/6 4895 :-`i V•99A11,, . A-4 WPM IASORATORIES, INC. • LOG OF BORINGS • aeVA OM 120.5 MO.Cy IJo7 MOM 4920 f�' 4915 Y• • i• • ;• 7112 e-. " „ 12/12 e .� 3/12 ' .• � , 9/T2 ;tip ,ri 4910 _� �~� •4 i. r• " 50/11 � i!A j...;? * ._ _ _ 4/12f�•8/12�� 4/12 �' •i-1 •. 4905 _ _ J 26/12 f .� I - - . 1-� • a 32/12 ' 30/12 ' 50/3 s'+-- _ ___ 50/3 EL-- 4900 • f .- -.., - -_ 50/6 Er• 50/5 � 4895 EMPIRE LABORATORIES, INC. • LOG OF BORINGS • 5L�VAP401J WO.9 Ma 1O N0.11 4915 -;/12 j; 7.. 20/12 4: 4910 ---1/4 r�•� - __ 16/12 50/3 10/12 4905 �- r , 45/12 j J/11 .. r. vo/i[ 4900 - 4 50/) "1 50/11 4895 ___ 50/6 x- -- 4890 oCOfi.9._ A-6 EAWIRE LABORATORIES, INC. LOG OF DOINGS ELEVATio _1 N0.12 NO 13 4910 +J� 4905 T /� . 16/12 .,` 4900 4/12 'v. 30/124- 4095 47/12 _ A-7 SCO8?4 EMPIRE LABORATORIES, INC. • • APPENDIX B. I� .'COR01 • • CONSOLIDATION--SWELL TEST CORING NO 7 DEPTM .� DRY DENSITY 114.1 PCF % MOISTURE 11. 2% . 44 g .43 0 ; . uz . 41 .40 - - - - - - - 0.1 0.5 1.0 0 10 APPLIED PRESSURE—TONS/SQ. FT. � 0 J 1 H=0 4verA 2 , o _ 3 v 4 0.1 0.5 1.0 S 10 APPLIED PRESSURE—TONS/SO. FT. B-z 2C*©8eM EMPIRE LABORATORIES, INC. N • v r IN NN NN NN ^ ' ^ ^ ^ .N•- _ 10N r• 10 � .•. N MI IN in M 3 y a 0 z r ,t, � �,ti� O O r 00 a CO Cs N 0 C r m CO t0 O • GS Ny N Ill in en GI .- NM N ell tz vtX EC 0 J V i0 r. • lv A Qj 10 U Q a I( 84 • 6= �R o 43 w. oc • Y- • y co j�x re I- . J D v y z im C N C•0 Q UJ F H N N O u. 3�_ 0 0 o Q O 2�x CO� O O O i ad- o 0 0 cC 2 0k Y W i O toeh r y nL- a >` JU LL � 0 O Cr a* N a to N- M in r V1 Zr tO ^ ^ C.0 • IN ° Oa� i cl a O- CO e � ao a r o I. n OD CO y o+ r Io m Ol o a Ol N b 0 •�^x O =• O1 .- a 1Oa M O • OM O .o. Ol mM NO In 2 N N r � ••- •-• .- .- � r r r a co in Co O Ill • O O O CO O O O C. Cr 0 0 . O O O �. In 0 C. 0 • in a= �, obbb 17nCI, .- 0n �; ^ •eil; a � 0laIr � ..aEf; tr .-.- dj b b b b b b b b bbbb b b b b ill bbbbb v oreMcoa• M � tbe M0000' en000e ma. co0 oIn17COo. 4 E • 4, 4( g .- N M S IA B-4 CJ -- • in y M '.. .- tD Cr �z L 01 Cr N p 0 0 in O O P ....• st .- O. o p M V1 M V) N V1 C' r C' an V1 C.m A A i • g2 Cc$ J lN 1 ., r., i a a a co sa - c Cr Y IIIK I g.SX p E" 3s_ cm i5 t cm C4 'a- M . F J N z• i oI W _ v a F R 0 - O W I- I- 4 a. .L. K O 2pF_X_ m Vl,2 m. W Q 6 4 x _ _ o CD y K a CO D t .r p y •N- (A 6 • . 1. CD o K N &sr n r. n V pN N N ut [' ds K 4D ' CO b 0i O N CV _ M a N M N V1 Cr .- CO Co 1!/ C• CO O r r N V1 IVK •b .- 1L1 N Q 1� V1 O. V N 1G M CO N Vf r- C4 .... ..- .... .- N .- .- .- ..- r Cr CO O O in V 1 CJ O VI V f CO O CD CD • V) CD CD (01 • p p 0 V) O CO CD ro . C• . . V1 • 6l ... n in 1. CO ... Cr Vf CO C. .- .- a Vf co � a Vf Cn .N-• d cat Ch - Yj a- J, 666J+ 6 66666 J, 6666 6666 .1) 6666 v_ • Om eN N. Merri CDC ona CO a• niaCOQ OMaC a C E x ge o Z �'Oy B-5 \ ` • za kk . 3k§ - /■ ¢ F o s - ,,. r. co ' e ` -.1 ° . g.; § i § - e } . } k/ � , f§ i. 0- f!_ cn &R UV r. )C- ez \ r ) a- .- . k2 ;- N.1 § / / tit \ \ / \ / \ 1".. —12 22Q� • �6 l • • APPENDIX C. (.0"-x.3 I PLACING FILL No sod, brush, frozen or thawing material , or other unsuitable material shall be placed in the fill , and no fill shall be placed during unfavorable weather conditions. All clods shall be broken into small pieces, and distribution of material in the fill shall be such as to preclude the formation of lenses of material differing from the surrounding material . The materials shall be delivered to and spread on the fill surface in a manner which will result in a uniformly compacted fill . Each layer shall be thoroughly blade mixed during spreading to insure uniformity of material and moisture in each layer. Prior to compacting, each layer shall have a maximum thickness of eight inches, and its upper surface shall be approximately horizontal . Each successive 6" to 8" lift of fill being placed .on slopes or hillsides should be benched into the existing slopes, providing good bond between the fill and existing ground. MOISTURE CONTROL - While being compacted, the fill material in each layer shall as nearly as practical contain the amount of moisture required for optimum compaction or as specified, and the moisture shall be uniform throughout the fill . The contractor may be required to add necessary moisture to the fill material and to uniformly mix the water with the fill material if, in the opinion of the soils engineer, it is not possible to obtain uniform moisture content by adding water on the fill surface. If, in the opinion of the soils engineer, the material proposed for use in the compacted fill is too wet to permit adequate compaction, it shall be dried in an acceptable manner prior to placement and compaction. COMPACTION When an acceptable, uniform moisture content is obtained, each layer shall be compacted by a method acceptable to the soils engineer and as specified in the foregoing report as determined by applicable standards. Compaction shall be performed by rolling with approved tamping rollers, f 0 Tnil C-3 pneumatic-tired rollers, three-wheel power rollers, vibratory compactors, or other approved equipment well-suited to the soil being compacted. If a sheepfoot roller is used, it shall be provided with cleaner bars attached in a manner which will prevent the accumulation of material between the tamper feet. The rollers should be designed so that effective weight can be increased. MOISTURE-DENSITY DETERMINATION Samples of representative fill materials to be placed shall be furnished by the contractor to the soils engineer for determination of maximum density and optimum moisture or percent of Relative Density for these materials. Tests for this determination will be made using methods conforming to requirements of ASTM D 698, ASTM D 1557, or ASTM D 2049. Copies of the results of these tests will be furnished to the owner, the project engineer, and the contractor. These test results shall be the basis of control for all compaction effort. DENSITY TESTS The density and moisture content of each layer of compacted fill will be determined by the soils engineer in accordance with ASTM D 1556, ASTM 0 2167, or ASTM D 2922. Any material found not to comply with the minimum specified density shall be recompacted until the required density is obtained. Sufficient density tests shall be made and submitted to support the soils engineer'S recommendations. The results of density tests will also be furnished to the owner, the project engineer, and the contractor by the soils engineer. C-4 ' .� • • • LAN D / Post Officc Box 210, Niwot, CO 80544-0210 WATER-Cl/ SMOPLY COMPANY (303) 652-2188, Metro (303) 4x43.2036 March 8, 1990 2 Mr. Calvin Youngberg, Engineer g g, Project 11OO South Sherman Street Longmont, CO 80501 Re: Water Service for Composting Project Dear Mr. Youngberg: Apparently there has been a misunderstanding concerning cur ability to serve the subject project. We have analyzed our system and there is no way we can serve this site without a line upgrade. Our lines from County Tine Road are already over--taxed and will not handle another 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. user. Under the circumstances, the Board of Directors may approve the temporary use of a cistern on your property that is filled in the off hours (by a timer and float system) . They do not allow this by private individuals but may allow it by the City of Longmont since it is the most economical method of serving the project and we want to continue our good working relationship. Please notify us by 3/13/90 if you wish to pursue a cistern as a temporary solution and we will bring it before the Board at our meeting on 3/13/90. Sincerely, am►0 es M. Dickey General Manager rr 0.0 1709 . • • • • St. (Rain zain Sanitation 1�istzict icsaint an) 4wee-Sanina Shea ar,g.40n. at. B boy, rib-4257° March 22, 2940 -fens monk60 8O5O/ Mr. Calvin Youngberg, Project Engineer Water/Wastewater Utilities City of Longmont 1100 South Sherman Street Longmont, Colorado 80501 RE: City of Longmont Composting Facility - Commitment to Service Dear Mr. Youngberg: This letter is in reference to the following-described real property: City of Longmont Composting Facility located in the E/2 of the NE/4 of Section 8, T3N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. Saint Vrain Sanitation District has 1852 SPE (single family equivalent) taps, of which 142 have been purchased, resulting in 1710 available for purchase. These taps are available to you and other eligible landowners on a first-come, first-serve basis. As the present supply of taps is consumed, the District plans to increase the size of its treatment - plant to serve 5,555 SFE taps. These additional taps would also be made available on a first-come, first-served basis. There is a major trunk line near to this property and a lateral line extension with highwaybore will be required. The above-referenced property is eligible to utilize the available supply of taps on a first--come, first-served basis, subject to the following: a. Installation of off-site lateral and connection to the District's system by the applicant; b. Execution of a Service Agreement; c. Purchase and payment of the required number of taps; and d. Compliance with the District's Rules and Regulations. n^ ^^., ? s • Page 2 Should you wish to obtain an absolute commitment to serve, taps may be prepurchased and held until needed. Monthly service charges will be assessed upon completion of construction or twelve months, whichever comes first. Should you have any questions concerning this matter, do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, jST�. VRAIN�N�ITATZON DISTRICT 0� L.D. Lawson, P.E. Manager LDL:dp 1"00c0 clots LOAre 4 �w r March 14, 1990 F Rod Allison �OL ��CS Weld County Planning OR 915 10th St. Greeley, CO 80631 RE: City of Longmont, wastewater sludge composting project (#440013 ) Dear Rod: The enclosed submittals constitute an application for rezoning o£ property adjacent to the City of Longmont's existing landfill. We have discussed this property and the rezoning procedure with you several times during the last few months. The property, which has just been purchased by the City, is part o£ the Baldridge/ Richardson PUD south of highway 119 at approximately County Road 3. The site has an area of 11 acres and is more fully described in the attached material. The proposed action is to withdraw the subject property from the existing PUD, which is zoned industrial/commercial (I-1 and C-2) and rezone it to agricultural (A-1) so that the property can be used for the City of Longmont's wastewater sludge composting facilities. The facilities will be comprised of structures and equipment that will be used for composting, sludge mixing, composting amendment storage and composting operation management. The enclosed information addresses the requirements of the weld County Rezoning Procedural Guide. Please review this information and let me know if you need anything else to take the rezoning to the Commissioners. We need to start construction of the project as soon as possible this spring, so if there is anything we can do to accelerate the approval schedule, please let me know. Sincerely, C4,6 1Jf"114-3Pr Calvin Youngberg Project Engineer MAR 2 2 1990 Enc. r Meld* llammi m cc: Jose Velazquez, CDM Brian Janonis, RBD John Chase, CDH Wes Potter, weld County Health Department SCC59,4 WATER/WASTEWATER UTILITIES 1100 SOUTH SHERMAN STREET, LONGMONT,COLORADO 80501 (303)651.8376 ear" •ZONING APPLICATION • CITY OF LONGMONT NARRATIVE ATTACHMENT 1. PROJECT HISTORY AND DESCRIPTION In 1987, the City of Longmont completed a major ($8 million) expansion of its wastewater treatment plant. Missing from this expansion were facilities for treatment and handling of sludge ("solids" ) . A decision on solids handling was delayed because the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the City were involved in a joint research project to evaluate innovative sludge treatment j methods. When the final research data on these methods became available, the City initiated a study to compare them to other alternatives. This study, titled Solids Management Study, City of Longmont, was *completed by Black and Veatch Engineers in 1987. The findings of the study were that aerated static pile composting of s sludge and land application of the compost were the most cost- effective and environmentally sound alternatives for wastewater solids handling. Since the City's intent was to apply for Federal funding to construct the recommended sludge treatment facilities, the study had to meet all Federal requirements for facilities planning defined in the Federal Clean Water Act. The study was approved by both the Colorado Department of Health and EPA in 1988 and design of the facilities was begun later that year. As part of the preliminary design work, some of the original study assumptions and costs were re-evaluated and refined. Several minor changes were then made to the original study and issued as an Addendum in 1989. These changes are discussed in more detail below. The Addendum was approved by the State and EPA in late 1989. A construction grant was also applied for and awarded in 1989. Bids on the project were opened in January and February of 1990 and award of construction contracts is currently pending EPA approval of the bidding documents. Since funding has been made available for the project, construction depends on County approval of rezoning of the property on which the composting facilities ar to be located (discussed in more detail below) . A Certificate of Designation to allow waste processing facilities on the site will also need to be acquired. Construction of the project is scheduled to begin in late spring of 1990. A copy of the Solids Management Study and the addendum are enclosed as part of this application. The records of newspaper articles and public hearings on the facilities planning portion of the project are contained in the appendices to the study. One of the changes that occurred in preliminary design was location of the composting facilities. The original Solids Management Study recommended locating the composting operation on the City landfill property. However, investigations of the soil and fill depths at the landfill found that the site was unsuitable for the type of structures that were needed. In order to avoid the delays involved in re-opening the study and revising the environmental assessment, other sites in close proximity to the original were examined. The land immediately north of the landfill was found to be available and VCOSin % • weld County Rezoning Application Kirrative Attachment. • Page 2 was purchased by the City. The specific piece of property is part of the area known as the Baldridge/Richardson PUD. The City has purchased 11 acres in the southeast corner of the PUD. We have been working with the owner of the property for almost a year and have demonstrated to his satisfaction that the composting project will be in harmony with the proposed land uses on the remainder of his PUD. However, since the land is currently zoned for industrial/commercial development, it must be rezoned to agricultural in order to allow the proposed use. The purchase contract, a copy of which is attached, contains the condition that the final purchase of the land is subject to approval of rezoning by Weld County. A brief description of the composting project may also be helpful to you in the review of this rezoning request. The project will be made up of facilities located both at the existing wastewater treatment plant and at the subject property. The initial step in the composting process will be dewatering of waste sludge at the wastewater plant. The dewatered sludge will then be transported by truck to the composting project site. At that location, it will be mixed with an organic amendment such as finished compost, composted organic material or wood chips and placed into five foot high piles for composting. Both the mixing and composting/curing buildings are completely enclosed to insure the proper conditions for composting and the ability to control all of the operation. The composting process will be accelerated by forced aeration supplied to the piles via blowers and perforated pipe. This initial composting period will last for 28-30 days. Finished compost will then be placed in curing piles and aerated at a lower rate for 30-60 days. Both the composting and curing operations will be operated using micro- processor control of aeration rates to guarantee rapid stabilization of the sludge. The final product will be taken to the City's existing State-approved land application sites in Boulder County or used as a revegetation amendment on the existing landfill, which will close in 1990. Odor control and mitigation has been a primary concern of the City throughout planning and design of the project. The facilities contain several features to address this concern. Since mixing the sludge with amendment will be a primary source of any odors, the mixing building air will be separately vented through an organic/ soil scrubber. In the composting/curing building, odor control will be provided by large, roof-mounted updraft ventilator fans to provide high ventilation rates and disperse and dilute any odors into the atmosphere. If additional odor control is found to be necessary in the future, the building ventilation systems are designed to allow the addition of air scrubbers. With respect to physical appearance, the buildings themselves will be metal warehouse-style structures and the site will be bermed and landscaped to screen the buildings from the rest of the PUD and from Highway 119. One of the primary directives in the design o£ the facilities was to make them compatible with the existing and proposed land uses in the area. i 2C015/1, 54,- : ' weld County Rezoning Application Narrative Attachment. • . Page 3 2. CONSISTENCY WITH POLICIES OF WELD COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The rezoning is consistent with and meets several of the policies of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. First, the use of the site for a composting facility is for the benefit o£ agricultural land. The compost product is to be used as a soil amendment either on the existing landfill to enhance revegetatian or on State-approved agricultural sites as a soil amendment. Although the approved application sites are currently in Boulder County, Weld County agricultural land could be used in the future. The composting facilities also meet the goal of permitting commercial and industrial uses of agricultural property at locations along highways with adequate access. The composting site is in an approved industrial/commercial (I-1 and C-2 zoning) PUD which has already been removed from agricultural uses; this rezoning will return a portion to the previous zoning classification, but with uses which remain compatible with the PUD. Adequate access is provided by the current landfill access road, which will be used for the proposed facilities. We intend to slightly widen and pave the road as part of this project. This road will eventually be further upgraded to serve as an alternate entrance to the adjacent PUD. As explained in the following paragraph, rezoning of the site is also compatible with the projected uses of the area as a commercial/industrial development zone between Longmont and Del Camino. 3. COMPATIBILITY OF PROPOSED USES WITH SURROUNDING LAND The uses of the rezoned property will be compatible with the approved land uses in the existing PUD, which is zoned industrial/ commercial. The sludge composting operation will be totally enclosed and will physically resemble a large warehouse structure. The site will be bermed and landscaped to provide a buffer between the facilities and the other PUD lots. The berms will also provide a visual screen to keep the buildings from being seen from Highway 119 . Operator activity at the site will be limited to 8 hours per day, 5 days per week. Traffic to the site will consist of the operators ' private vehicles (4 or 5 per day) and 5 single-axle (3 to 5 cubic yard) dump trucks per day. The ultimate utilization of the j facilities, which is projected for the year 2010, would result in traffic loads of 5 private vehicles and 12 to 15 trucks per day. The access road for this facility will be out of the PUD corridor and will utilize the roadway that already exists to serve the Longmont City landfill. Other industrial or light industrial uses in the area would have buildings of similar appearance and would probably have a much higher number of employees per acre of development with correspondingly higher traffic impacts. Even if the PUD would develop with commercial users, the composting facilities will still generate lower traffic, noise and visual impacts, as exemplified by other commercial ventures in the Highway 119 corridor. There may be some concerns about odors generated by the facilities and the impact on the surrounding land uses. As explained above, the design of the facilities has taken this into account from the beginning. The most odorous part of the operation, mixing of sludge with composting amendment, will be ventilated through a biological soil scrubber, which should eliminate any odors from this source. Although the active composting portion of the project will be totally aerobic, which should minimize offensive odors, the composting building has also been designed to prevent such problems. The composting operation itself will be totally �e.059, Weld County Rezoning Application ` Narrative Attachment• • Page 4 enclosed and will be actively ventilated by large updraft fans in the roof. This will insure positive mixing and dispersion of building air into the atmosphere even during stagnant weather conditions. Also, this site was chosen in part to take advantage of prevailing winds and air movement which will tend to dilute and disperse any odors quickly. The odors associated with the composting operation are expected to be far less noticeable than many agricultural activities. Since the process is totally enclosed and controlled and the ventilation at critical points is scrubbed, there should be no detriment to the proposed land uses in the remainder of the PUD. All property in the vicinity of the subject parcel is zoned Agricultural except for the Baldridge/Richardson PUD, a portion of which this rezoning request addresses. Although the composting facilities will be a special use within the proposed agricultural zoning, the mitigation for both visual and odor impacts described above should prevent any negative impacts on the surrounding land uses. 4. AVAILABILITY OF WATER AND SEWER UTILITIES The water system will be provided by Left Hand water company. Water will only be used in the operations building. Sewer service for the facilities will be provided by the St. Vrain Sanitation District. The only source of sewage will be the operations building. Although Left Hand indicates that they do not have adequate pressure to serve the operations building, they have left open the possibility of the use of a holding tank or cistern which would be filled during low- use hours. The City has planned for the installation of a tank in the operations building, and if Left Hand can not deliver the water the city will deliver bulk water to the site by truck as needed. Letters from both of the utilities regarding service are attached. 5. SOIL SURVEY A soil survey of the site was prepared for this project by Empire Labs, Inc. A copy is attached. No limitations were found for construction of the proposed facilities. 6. ROAD AND HIGHWAY ACCESS The existing landfill access road is adequate for the proposed zoning and use of the property. The road will be widened from 24 ft. to 28 ft. , regraded and paved as part of the construction of the composting facilities. The City has an access easement from Highway 119 to the City landfill which will be maintained to serve this project. 7. SAND, GRAVEL AND MINERAL RESOURCES No mineral resources have been found under the property. 8. FLOOD PLAIN, GEOLOGIC HAZARD, OVERLAY AREA The, property is not located in a flood plain, area of geologic hazard or any Weld County overlay area. 9. PROOF OF APPLICANT'S INTEREST IN PROPERTY A copy of the signed purchase contract for the property is attached. The purchase is contingent on rezoning by the County. Weld County Rezoning Application Narrative Attachment • Page 5 11. OWNERS OF ADJACENT PROPERTY A certified list o£ property owners within 500 feet of the subject property is attached. 12. OWNERS/LESSEES OF MINERAL RIGHTS There are no owners or lessees of mineral rights on the subject property. 13. VICINITY AND LAND USE MAP A vicinity and land use map for the subject property is attached. 14. REZONING PLAT A rezoning plat in conformance with County requirements is attached. eC0.7'; ill• REZONING APPLICATION Case 0 Weld County, Colorado Dept. o£ Planning Services App. Ch'd By: Date Recd: 915 10th Street App. Fee: Receipt 0: Greeley, Colorado 80631 Record. Fee Receipt 0: TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT. Please print or type, except for necessary signature. I (we) , the undersigned, hereby request hearings before the Weld County Planning Commisaion and the Weld County Board of County Commissioners concerning the proposed rezoning of the following described unincorporated area of Weld County, Colorado: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SEE ATTACHED (If additional apace is required, attach an additional sheet) Property Address (if available): W.A. PRESENT ZONE I-1&C-2 PROPOSED ZONE A-1 TOTAL ACREAGE11 .00 OVERLAY ZONES NONE SURFACE FEE (PROPERTY OWNERS) OF AREA PROPOSED FOR REZONING: Name: CITY OF LONGMONT Home Telephone 0: Address: 3rd Ave. & Kimbark St. BUS. Telephone 0: 776-6050 LONGMONT, CO 80501 Name: Hone Telephone 0: Address: Bus. Telephone 0: Name: Home Telephone 0: Address: Bun. Telephone 0: Applicant or Authorized Agent (if different than above) : Name: FrederiCk Wilson, Mayor Home Telephone 0: Address: Same as above Bus. Telephone 0: See above Owner(n) and/or lessees of mineral rights on or under the subject properties of record in the Weld County Assessor's Office: Name: NONE Address: Name-_ Address: Name: Address: I hereby depose and state under the penalties of perjury that all statements, proposals and/or plans submitted with or contained within this application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. COUNTY OF WELD ) STATE OF COLORADO ) d Sig t re: Owner or Auth rued Agent - Subscribed and sworn to before me this lyres day of 1'22,44.4.4" SEAL /11-9-1-42-49 / NOTARY LIC XJ /f4L . n•- ri�V:.P'2 • LEGAL DESCRIPTION CITY OF LONGMONT SLUDGE COMPOST FACILITY SITE A tract of land located in the Northeast Quarter of Section 8, Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado, being more particularly described as follows: Considering the East line of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 8 as bearing South 01°35'58" East and with all bearings contained herein relative thereto: Commencing at the Northeast Corner of said Section 8: thence along the said East line, South 01035'58" East, 440.00 feet to the -POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing along said East line; South 01°35' 58" East, 872.74 feet: thence South 89°49'40" West, 562.45 feet: thence, North 01035 '58" West, 784.67 feet: thence, North 68024'03" East, 177 . 75 feet to a point on a curve concaved to the South having a central angle of 20000'00" , a radius of 220.00 feet and the chord of which bears North 78°24'03" East, 76.41 feet; thence along the arc of said curve 76.79 feet; thence, North 88024'03" East, 320.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. The above described tract contains 11 .000 acres and is subject to all easements and rights-of-way now on record or existing. SCCE•Al. • . crts Loslc•MosIT a.0W6 CHA1.lGe • t Dl5'(Ktcl Dl6TQttc 11 se 2d' 03" a 37.0.00' ce16,41i 1.1 less o3"E e• Q Q= 0' t. 220.00' L-16 8 EC. cOZn1e Ptsi A=20 00` 00" $ s tJ SEC. 2 m 1zsl, g 69dJ N 66 24' 03' 6 t11.1 ti N Moo° Acess s � s• r c0 sJ EAST u�le, eJE is r to SEC. 8-2-68 0 Z t"- 4,00, 562.44 o Szet a4 2E0Ag s eR° 44?'4o" v./ w/L.S. 14823 CAP rEt32LIAgsf 27 MO i DESCRIPTION OF CITY OF LONCMONT COMPOST FACILITY SITE A tract of land located in tho Northeast Quarter of Section 8, Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M., Boulder County, Colorado, being mote particularly described as follows; Considering the East line of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 8 as bearing South 01'35'58" East and with all bearings contained herein rela- tive thereto: Commencing At the Northeast Corner of said Section 8; thence along the said East line, South 01'35'58" East, 440.00 feet to the POINT . OF BEGINNING; thence continuing along said East line; South 01'35'58" East, 1172.74 feet-, thence, South 89'49'40" West, 562.45 feet; thence,. North 01'35'58" West, 784.67 foot; thence. North 68.24'03" East. 177,75 feat to a point on a curve concaved co the South having a central angle of 20'00'00", a radius of 220.00 feet and the chord of which bears North 78'24'03' East, 76.41 feet; thonce along the arc of said curve 76.79 feat; chance. North 88' 24'03" East, 320.00 feet to the Point of Beginning. The above described tract contains 11.000 arras and is subject co all easo- monts and rights-of-way now on record or existing. SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE: I hereby certify that this plat was -". pp1(1) Sf' , • prepared under my supervision; and that tho same is correct co s, 4�'`, the boat of my knowledge and belief. ; A ��{1S •I; <,,,,,y�f Q L 1'4, f co of; Atter( ,749 COLORADO LS NO.4 • ../91- �P� PROPERTY OWNERS APPROVAL: I, _City of Longmont , Doing . Of CO�,O-/ the sole owner(s) in foo 0f tha above described property, do __ hereby request the zoning as sho on a attached map. Ma or The foregoing certification was acknowledged before mo this /� eitl ,) //,Gas! A.D., 19n,. Witness my hand and seal. My commission expires:yjjiwft4d/15 /492— • Notary blic PLANNING COMMISSION CERTIFICATION; This is to certify that the Weld County Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the Board of Commissioners, Weld County, Colorado for their confirmation, approval and adoption of this Zone Change as shown and described hereon this day of , 19„_ Chairman, Planning Commission BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CERTIFICATION: This is to certify that the Board of County Commissioners, Weld County, Colorado do hereby confirm, approve and accept this Zone Change as shown and described hereon this _ day of _ , 19_ ATTEST: County Clerk Chairman, °n,, S.-Et& Board of Co. Commissioners ,_\."V . _ _ RECORDED: Riai)4 Deputy DATE; &p"rwnp Cenwww. • Colorado • ' • Escrow hum STREET.SUITE C • c°i umoc Services, Inc. 520 M1 I0N0M0NT•CO 80507 • METR0.OM)5343009 STATEMENT OF SETTLEMENT SELLER'S p PURCE SER'S Dx PROPERTY ADDRESS_ SELLER C. P. RICHARDSON PURCHASER_ THE CITY OF LONGMONT, A SET'TLEMENTDATR March 9 199O MUNICIPAL CORPORATION DATE OF PRORATION March 8, 1990 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Schedule A, #5, Longmont Title Insurance Commitment #14974 D•Mt Croce 1 Selling Prtce 1132,000; 00 . . 2. Deposit,paid to ! 3. Trust Deed,payable to ' I t 4. �Yust wed.parable to i� _r t 3. Trusteed,paYoff to I I II I I 6. Interest on Loan Assumed I -- ?. Title Ina.Premium I i. i 8. Abstracting: Before$ale I .. I s• After bale 1 I 1 10. Title F-milm by I II 11. Recording: Warranty Deed I I d I 22. Trust Deed 1 101 00 h 1 13. Release I q lS other ! / !1 15. Documentary Fee • I • II 16. ertifrtate of axes ue I 131 20 ;; 17. Taxes for Preceding Year 1989 I 10; 00 I I 18. Taxes for Current Year ($140.27) 67 days @ $.3g43 I I !I I 19. Tax Reserve I ' 25175 3�`—pecial Taxes I f1 1 3L Personal Property Taxes I I 1 '�_ M. Hazard Ins.Prem.Assumed—policy No. Co. ! 11 I 3 Yr.Term Expires 11 1 Premium$ Days Unused at I II ! 23. Premium for New Insurance ¢per day I I I '4• stye I ii I . %S- FHA Mortgage Ins.Assumed I :6. FHA Mrortgage Ins.Reserve I — r7. I of tern a Fee (Buyer) I II :8. Loan Discount Fee (Seller) ! I� I•_ �. Interest on New 1.O33 I survey and/or Credit Report I I :l. Appraisal Fee I I II I t2. Water and/or Sewer I 1 j, I t3. Rents 1 JI :a. Security Deposits I I II I t5. Loan Transfer Fee I ! I r6. Loan Payment Due 1 1 1 r7. Broker's Pee I I I 58. Closing Fee 1 I 9. Reimbursement to Dennis Gould for plowing 321501 I 198 100 I jI � 4 (� I I I I , ------- I I -_ u•o•3 - • alantedue to/trots Seiler 1132,263170 2 7 glance due ed9from Buyer I I I OTAL$ I 1 1 U.2171 95 1132,263170 1• 132,263170 •eabove figures do not include sales or use takes on personal property • APPROVED and ACCEPTED COLORADO ESCROW SERVICES, INC. AS AGENT F01 zthaser/ T „" Broker DYER REALTY, INC. CO ORAT N N: • • 1 CONTRACT TO BUY AND SELL VACANT PROPERTY • THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 19th day o£ February , 1990, by and between Cordell p. Richardson, 1431 Elmhurst Lane, Longmont, Colorado 80501, hereinafter referred to as Seller, and the City of Longmont, Colorado, hereinafter referred to as Purchaser. The Purchaser hereby agrees to buy the herein described real property and Seller hereby agrees to sell the hereinafter described real property upon the terms and conditions stated herein, to wit: A tract of land located in the Northeast Quarter of Section 8, Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado, being more particularly described as follows: Considering the East line of•the Northeast Quarter of said Section 8 as bearing South 010 35'58" East and with all bearing contained herein relative thereto: Commencing at the Northeast Corner of said Section 8; thence along the said East line, South 01 35'58" East, 440.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing along said East line: South 01 35'58" 872.74 feet; thence South 89 49'40" West, 562.45 feet; thence North 01 35'58" West, 784.67 feet; thence, North 68 24'03" East, 177.75 feet to a point on a curve concaved to the South having a central angle of 20 00'00", a radius of 220.00 feet and the chord of which bears North 78 24'03" East, 76.40 feet; thence along the • arc of said curve 76.79 feet; thence North 88 24'03" East, 320.00 feet to the Point of Beginning. The above described tract contains 11.000 acres and is subject to all easements and rights-of-way now on record or existing. Together with all easements and rights-of-way pertinent thereto, all improvements thereon and all fixtures of a permanent nature currently upon the premises except as hereinafter provided, in their present condition, all ordinary wear and tear excepted, hereinafter called the Property. The purchase price shall be One hundred and thirty-two thousand (3132,000.00) dollars, payable as follows: 1. 3132,000.00 will be paid by the Purchaser to the Seller at the time of closing, plus an additional adjustment for growing crops, if any, at the time of closing. Purchaser agrees that, in the event the subject real property will not be developed during the 1990 growing season, it will lease the real property to the-current farmer. In such event, Purchaser shall reimburse farmer for reasonable planting preparations which were completed prior to sale, not to exceed $ 250.00 . This covenant shall survive closing. • • Contract to Buy and Sell Vacant Property February 15, 1990 2. An abstract of title to the Property, certified to date, or a current commitment for title insurance policy in an amount equal to the purchase price, at Sellers option and expense, shall be furnished to Purchaser on or before the date of closing. If Seller elects to furnish the title insurance commitment, Seller will deliver the title insurance policy to the Purchaser after closing and pay the premium thereof. 3. Title shall be merchantable in the Seller, except as stated in this Agreement. Subject to the payment or tender as above provided and compliance by Purchaser with other terms and provisions hereof, Seller shall execute and deliver a sufficient Warranty Deed to Purchaser on the 9th day of March, 1990 at the hour of 2:00 p.m. at the offices of the City Attorney, 408 3rd Avenue, Longmont, Colorado, or, by mutual agreement at some other date and time, conveying the property free and clear of all taxes, liens, and encumbrances. 4. If the title is not merchantable, and written notice of defects is given by Purchaser or Purchaser's agent to Seller or Seller's agent on or before the date of closing, Seller shall use reasonable effort to correct said defects prior to the date of closing. If seller is unable to correct the defects on or before the date of closing, at Seller's option and upon written notice to Purchaser or Purchaser's agent on or before the date of closing, the date of closing shall be extended 30 days for the purpose of correcting said defects. If title is not rendered merchantable as provided herein, at Purchaser's option, this contract shall be void and have no effect and each party hereto shall be released from all obligations hereunder. 5. Any encumbrances required to be paid may be paid at the time of settlement from the proceeds of this transaction or from any other source. 6. General taxes for the year of closing, based upon the most recent levy and , assessment, in entrance on encumbrances, if any, shall be apportioned at the date of delivery of the Deed. I 7. Possession of the Property shall be delivered to Purchaser on the Date of Closing. In the event that the Property is substantially damaged by £ire, flood, or other casualty before the date of this contract and the date of delivery of Deed, Purchaser may elect to terminate this contract. 8. This contract is contingent upon the Seller, the Seller's agent, the Purchaser, or the Purchaser's agent obtaining a rezoning of the property to an agricultural zoning by the County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado,at purchaser's cost and expense. Geer... S 2 • • Contract to Buy and Sell Vacant Property February 15, 1990 9. All terms and conditions with respect to this offer are expressly contained herein and the Seller agrees that no representative or agent o£ the Purchaser has made any representation or promise with respect to this offer not expressly contained herein. The word Seller as used herein shall include the plural number, and where more than one Seller signs the offer, all shall be bound by the terms hereof. 10. From and after the date of execution of this offer by the Seller, the Seller agrees to permit the Purchaser, its duly authorized agents, 'I employees, contractors or representatives to enter upon the land at any time for the purpose of making or drilling test borings, making load tests, topographical, property line and utility surveys and appraisals. 11. Time is of the essence hereof. X£ any obligation hereunder is not performed as herein provided, this contract shall be null and void. 12. X£ this proposal is accepted by Seller, by signing a copy of this Agreement on or before February 10, 1990, and by the execution of a copy of this Agreement by the Mayor of the City of Longmont on or before February 28, 1990, this instrument shall become a contract between the Seller and the Purchaser, and shall inure to the benefit of the heirs, successors, and assigns of such parties. 13. Purchaser shall utilize its best efforts to locate any new structures in the southeast corner o£ the real property in recognition of Seller's adjacent property. Purchaser agrees to cooperate with the Seller and the St. Vrain Sanitation District for the location of joint sewer lines so as not to prevent service to adjacent property. This covenant shall survive j closing. 14. Purchaser shall not deny access to any roads shown on the PUD plan approved by weld County for property adjacent to the purchased parcel. This covenant shall survive closing. CITY OF LONGMONT, COLORADO MAYOR i ATTEST: CXTY CLERK 3 O �/�� ©.— .'J O • Contract to Buy and Sell Vacant Property February 15, 1990 I i APPROVED AS TO FORM: 46 .675a _ D. BAILEY DEPUTY CITY ATPORN i SELLER CORDELL P. RICHARDSON STATE OF COLORADO ) COUNTY OF ) ss. Subscribed and sworn to before me by Cordell P. Richardson this 19th day of February , 1990. _ My Commission expires January 17.1993 /Efarvin L D��r Notary Public •tAtiaLe • DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES 1/4 PHONE(303)356-4800,EXT.1400 91510th STREET IlliGREELEY,COLORA00 80831 k COLORADO NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Weld County Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, July 24, 1990, at 1 :30 p.m. for the purpose of considering a a Change o£ Zone for the property described below. Approval of the request may create a vested property right pursuant to Colorado Law. APPLICANT: City of Longmont LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NEi of Section 8, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.N.., Weld County, Colorado TYPE AND INTENSITY OF PROPOSED USE: Change of Zone from PUD (Planned Unit Development) for C-1 (Commercial) and I-2 (Industrial) uses to A (Agricultural) uses LOCATION: South of State Highway 119 at the approximate location of Weld County Road 5 SIZE: 11 acres, more or less The public hearing will be held in the Room 316, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado. Comments or objections related to the above request should be submitted in writing to the Weld County Department of Planning Services, 915 Tenth Street, Room 342, Greeley, Colorado 80631, before the above date or presented at the public hearing on July 24, 1990. Copies of the application are available for public inspection in the Department of Planning Services, Room 342, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado 80631 - Phone - 356-4000, Extension 4400. Ernie Ross, Chairman Weld County Planning Commission To be published in the New News To be published one (1) time by July 12, 1990 i �,/J� �n Received by: s O.Qgri �t//�� Date: ((JJ��JJ 0 • SENDER: Motel s 7 and 2 when additional servlCee ere desired. and complete eerna e 3 and 4, Put your address in the•'RETURN TO"Space on the reverse Side•Falklre to do this will---n�tetdhi_s carrrdd from being returned to you.The ter Mt ril provide Vt.Vlat name ot�hs postr7:Star)«e' She a p}del POI additional fsea the fc rag aervrCM era.evaiTellTe.Ca+ DOa �o}+ark bOX OS for addHanel serviced*regwend• —i t. 0 Show to whom delivered,data,and eddraeMs'a address- 2. fJ I£tr :6Wesry 4 (Emu reertiN H 4. Article NwYtheer 929 0- 2 o lass 3. Attiole.AddrMeedio:.: _ . . _.. _ .. / F07- ▪ ' 0 y CITY OF LONGMONT 7 of Service: ru r I pe -� I C/0 CALVIN YOU.GBERG II Register•a-+ ❑Insurede0 CC D H :.1 0 �Certified. ❑COD Q W g Hoci 0 1100 SOUTH $IiER"tAN STREET ❑ Exprese MW' ❑"e um e^dlx z Z o forRxs�r v Eve ( LONGMONT, CO 80501 CC t= 0o W Always obtain signature of addressee Lrl '��Y fr 0 r y O j --_ .,. --.—r--^—. —� or new and DATE DELIVERED. • 1— s= G x y U I: 8. AAdressee's Address (ONLY if w= «3 N H 1• 5. Signature A ..... requested and fie paid) Q. O H v r X �f q CC O 0 N Z $ 8, Signature Y 00 a. , r+v O ,r„ X U CJ ti ii.O 7. O a iye -- �I9 DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT*uaA►o.rees•z+sete PS Forth 3$11,Apr. 1989 —_ �tvrmaytz -Pry' 9/3/qo PcoR/ • COmOlete Items t. and 2 when addhional services ere desired, end oompNte Ream • 3 and 4 Out your address in the"RETURN TO"Spare on the reverse aide.Failure to do this will prevevm ttdnia coo from being returned to you.The return the } fee wil1FrOvell WU the Rem,Of SR9De!s4C.Qeli '.i reel th drei],ly 9yf Q wry For additional fees t Ollewing.services ere available.Consult delimiter orb d and-chack boxissl�M additional serve:el)requested. C 1. O ShOw to whom delivered,date,and eddreseM's address. 2. Q Restricted Delivery 2 .(Ezra charge) (Eels charge) 0 c:, ----_, ^ - 3. Article Addressed.to: 4. Article&umber *F C.P. RICHARDSON T ape of Service: 9 Li Registered Q Inwrad c 1431 ELHURS LANE JEQ Certified Coo et 8? o a®0 LONGMONT, CO 80501 O Expre..Mail ❑Return Me Receipt t1e VI I_1'6. y - Ionawa»Wien signature of address• Lti L"F ID a.. a - ._---- or agent and GATE DELIVERED. C_ (j N a y f-d5. Signature --Addressee �8. Addressee's Address (ONLY if CC t:1 O m W X requested wafer paid) x o. ni 8. Si nature —Age/n�t nr-7. 0e�of Deli �� e�1�V--a ,•J PS.-Fom%381..1.:Apr..1989 - .ue.0.Ro.tassae.sts DOMESTIC RETURN REC[,In 0 • • sewn: Omptete Items 1 sM 2 Mn additional/pinkiees:re ^� P�.QImPla 3 end 4. dWred, and complete name Put your address in the"RETURN TO"Space On the revery side,Failure to do this will from being returned to you:The�@t_um�re. .lpt fee will IXeeen..this card the date o+de1M For eetlition laea'Fa to ow'l�'serv�"�Me nerve W tM o t post li xd 4 bo 1 r1� MO rtes era eeB4ef e> pn�t ppatmeep�aea chaC x ea3 for additional aerypefs)requested. J i 1. ❑ ShOw to whom dalivere,date,and addressee's address. 2. 0 Remitted Del kk- 0 P �en 3, Ankle Addressed to: .��)...... !Pura dwrgr) >. — ,. 6. Artk upmDar / W r a oo -�I DONALD AND ADELL $ALDRIGE T �ice: . . ti f, ape of Service: - c o 5525 EAST PLATTE L.I Registered 0 Inured m w in COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80903 IXc•rufrM 0 cm D., 0?nil ".1 W m • ❑ Express Mall [j Return Recee��pRt X W e a V ter MerthnnQiee ..0 0 .;' W Q N Always Obtain•ipnsturs of edcroeee• trl LL �� • ] a a a s. 7E DELIVERED. u7 a o hs_ .- A °i °' 5. Signature —Addressee 8 VD t' , A .dress (ONLY if D- w O W p A • O. Signature —Agent y ¢ cdCCE '6 j �l �'V a z in .4 � 7. a of -� s% Jh O vv1 0 ,n Z n "rJ) - - PS orm 38( 1,-Apr. 1989 oti.a.O.RO.tesensate DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT liar 3 and 4, _ Put your address in the"RETURN TO"Space on the reverse aide.Failure to do this will prevent this card -from being returned to you.The return ret esalee von. .Ste you t._ n ma +t r• n delivered to and• a date of delivery,For additional lees the following eervrcos le available. sv t postmaster or fees end c Itbmclee) or additional servkele)requested. J 1. 0 Show to whom delivered,deb,and oddments address. 2. ❑ Restricted Delivery Z (Fara charge) - Mora charge) 3. Article Addressed SO:. 4, Article N or V _ " =i sa- 4y� • w CITY OF LONGMONT RS ¢ * 3RD AND KIMBARK Toe Registered,ofSe , !� 0 "' ., U Inerwep,'; cO gi g F 1 LONGMONT, CO 80501 terrines O COD • .D cc 10 k O r £ co Evens Mall Qfor Return ise art U.0§E e aq O _ Awn obtain signature of Meroeess tit 2 r 5 C H L] ! '�_—_ --. —__ _, or epem and DATE DELIVERED. 5. Signature •w' r.7 X4 I r .� S. Addressee's Address (ONLY if — f1 w W x❑ ,ZN X ` ! requested and fie Paid) ¢ O 6 - I l IS. Signature —Agent IPi 0 � !r x XJ� H fY O s.^ 7. r j,I ep/I �� U cc 0 PS "! 'It Apr. 1989 •u.a4RO.menssam DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT ‘--,v.........__...,-._ frOmeebq returned LO you.The set m rerelpt 1 wAl prdvide Y9u 1F,9 name Ot ne .. .moe LM dote iletu rvit°<For sddih nel�aes the ftery p services are items Tee C.ol result poatmaets'-e e�or�. s c x w Tar eddltionel aerviCe(e)regaesterl ; J 1. O Show to whom delivered,date,and eddrenee'a adding. 2. O Restricted Deivery (Extra Marge) lExire Merril NI a 3• . Article Addressed. . _. 4. Arricle,Clumber S w o< to in (-7J 400( LL a' y ERNEST PETERSON T of Service: IL ¢ 0 o 12963 HILLCREST DRIVE RegisteredInsured o W 8� 0 w LONGMONT, CO 80$01 lxa M.N ns 0 RMum Ra x pt Cr U�p ¢�a fn W f9r Merchendke j2O 3 W U U Ahvete Obtain iifgnelyrs of eibMws .7.- F .] a DATE DELIVERED, - Lrl Nei m W U , _�___ —___—r_.�_._ _ d g o. i-+ F, a 5. Signature —�A'd�dresse�s_�-� 8. e.•es'a Address (ONLY if a 0 F" O X /�._ `�,'.G�C�^ rrgerxred and fee geld! ¢ zw Cs � g I 2 O. Signature —Agents�� pQ m ,`"� 0 ` X ' tiner ,ti:. vu,,611- 7. Date of Delivery _ I'-�3-90 PS Form 3811,Apr. 1989 .us.O.ro.tessaaeats DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT • seed of+ec trbo i� We N Nrvicetel re eesbd.'�.•!><ere w.••..••••. •••• -El 1. ❑ Show to whom delhrered,date,and addressees address. 2. ❑ Restricted Deivery I (Ecre clrrge) (Erin Margt) J 3. Article Addressed t0: 4. Artkb umber a O ST. VRAIN, LIMITED Tempe of Service: Ir u d' 0 w C/0 RICHARD DOMENICO C Registered O Mond ru R"f� .) kt 8200 WEST 67TH STREET Certified ❑coo ¢ F D N a Express Mee ❑ Rawm Receipt D., w t g H woo o ARVADA, CO 80004 +a Me Crean 0 Sg.,! N z O AIweM pntain aiprisNro of•ddiwees li .A O g a H p F W —�... _,.___` s awn rip GATE DELIVERED. Ln LL 22 2 "a '.- 5. rgneture Addressee ( 8. A.�7r��]a�ee'•Address !ONLY IJ I—'4 0 ry .�(!/ '..rte.` and fee paid) O. w ls 2 z z' o, " 201 /fy'yr0irr�.�rti V ¢¢ 0 (4 a 8. Signature —Agent - W im f-i dq � ^_ ¢ ' p� OO ; a 0 7` Date Of Delivery to{)'0 2� tea.,Vv�"�1 F. O M < in:- CA 6 PS Fern 381'1,Apr.1989 *aeon teenea sse DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT 4a IA 0470t 71 C) u March 16, 1990 E Wes Potter, Director T Weld County Health Department �oZOR :: 1516 Hospital Road Greeley, CO 80631 RE: City of Longmont sludge composting facilities (11440013 ) Dear Wes: The materials accompanying this letter are the application for a Certificate of Designation for a solid waste processing facility. The City wishes to compost the waste sludge from its wastewater treatment plant at a site adjacent to the our existing landfill, and requires a CD to allow this use of the property. The CD application is for a waste processing facility only; no disposal of any material will take place on the site. As we have discussed with you, a complete description of the project, including the facilities plan, the engineering reports and the plan of operation are included to provide information on the project for you, the commissioners, the State and the public. We have also included several journal articles, excerpts from design texts and our composting research results to acquaint all the reviewing parties with the concept of aerated static pile composting of sludge. Bids on the project have been opened and, pending EPA approval of the construction contracts, we are ready to proceed. we would like to begin construction in late spring of this year, if possible. We would be happy to provide any further information or assistance which would assist you or the State in your review. If you have any questions or comments on the enclosed information, or need additional material, please call Calvin Youngberg of my staff at 651-8399. Sincerely, CITY OF LONGMONT Steven Miller, Director Water/Wastewater Utilities SM/cy Enc. cc: Steve Orzinski, CDH Rod Allison, Weld County Planning Neal Renfroe 9COSZ • WATER/WASTEWATER UTILITIES 1100 SOUTH SHERMAN STREET, LONGMONT,COLORADO 80501 (303)651-8276 •q ..r 9�caria ;ISIWJ?R tvnta2'R'w7C:ru".? t ;. i&^een.l.tcr1.5".A.1 CITY OF LONGMONT WASTEWATER SOLIDS HANDLING FACILITIES APPLICATION FOR WELD COUNTY CERTIFICATE OF DESIGNATION The following information is presented to comply with the Colorado Department of Health's Solid Waste Disposal Site or Facility Application Guidance Document. Since the Certificate of Designation is being requested for a sludge composting (processing) facility only, and no disposal of any waste material on the site is proposed, much of the Guidance does not apply. A general description of the facility is presented below, after which the specific requirements of the Guidance are addressed. History and Description of Proposed Facilities In 1987, the City of Longmont completed an $8 million expansion of its wastewater treatment plant. Missing from this expansion were facilities to handle waste sludge ("solids") . A decision on solids handling was delayed because the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the City were involved in a joint research project to evaluate innovative sludge treatment methods. When the final research data on these methods had been collected, the City initiated a study to compare the innovative sludge treatment and disposal methods with other alternatives. This Solids Management Study, which was prepared by Black and Veatch Engineers, was completed in late 1987. The findings of the study were that aerated static pile composting of sludge and land application of the composted material were the most cost-effective and environmentally sound alternatives for wastewater solids handling. The study met all Federal requirements for facilities planning defined in the Clean Water Act so that the City could apply for Federal funding to construct the recommended sludge treatment facilities. The study was approved by both the Colorado Department of Health and EPA in 1988 and design of the facilities was begun later that year. As part of the preliminary design work, some of the original study assumptions and costs were re-evaluated and refined. Several minor changes were then made to the original study and issued as an Addendum in 1989. These changes are discussed in more detail in the following paragraph. The Addendum was approved by the State and EPA in 1989. A construction grant was also applied for and awarded in 1989. Bids on the project were opened in January and February of 1990 and award of construction contracts is currently pending EPA review of the bidding documents. Since funding has been made available for the project, construction depends on Weld County approval of rezoning of the site on which the facilities are to be located and granting of a Certificate of Designation for a solid waste processing operation. Construction of the project is scheduled to begin in the late spring of 1990. A copy of the Solids Management Study and the Addendum are enclosed for your information. The records of newspaper articles and public hearings are contained in the appendices to the study. ecosw Application for weld County Certificate of Designation City of Longmont Wastewater Solids Handling Facilities Page 2 One of the changes addressed in the Addendum to the Solids Management Study is location o£ the composting facilities. The original study recommended locating the composting operation on the City landfill property. However, investigations of the soil and fill depths at the landfill found that the site was unsuitable for the type of structures that were needed. In order to avoid the delays involved in re-opening the study and revising the environmental assessment, other sites in close proximity to the original were examined. The land immediately north of the landfill was found to be available and has been purchased by the City. The specific piece of property is known as the Baldridge/Richardson PUD, which is located next to Highway 119 adjacent to the city's existing landfill. A map of the PUD which shows the proposed purchase is enclosed as part of the CD application. we have been working with the owner of the property and have demonstrated to his satisfaction that the composting project will be in harmony with the proposed land uses on the remainder of his PUD. - However, since the land is currently zoned for industrial and commercial uses, it must be rezoned to agricultural in order to allow the proposed use. The owner has agreed that the purchase of the land is subject to approval of rezoning by Weld County. The rezoning request has been submitted to the weld County Planning Department for review. A brief physical description of the composting project may also be helpful to you in your review, and is presented here as a supplement to the information contained in the CD application. The project will include new facilities located both at the wastewater plant and at the composting site. The initial step in the composting process will be dewatering of waste sludge at the City's wastewater plant. The dewatered sludge will then be trucked to the composting project site. At that location, it will be mixed with an amendment such as finished compost, composted organic material or wood chips and placed into five foot high piles for composting. Both the mixing and composting/curing buildings will be completely enclosed to insure the correct conditions for composting and proper control of all processes. The composting process will be controlled and accelerated by forced aeration supplied to the piles via blowers and perforated pipe. This initial composting period will last for 28-30 days. Finished compost will then be placed in curing piles and aerated at a lower rate for 30-60 days. Both composting and curing will be operated using microprocessor control of aeration rates to guarantee rapid stabilization of the sludge. The final product will be disposed of on the City's currently approved land application sites in Boulder County or used as a revegetation • amendment on the existing landfill, which will close in 1990. Odor control and mitigation of odor problems has been a major factor in both planning and design of the project. The facilities contain several features which address odor concerns. First, the site for the j composting facilities was chosen in part because it experiences weather and wind patterns that are favorable for dispersion and dilution. Second, both the mixing and composting operations will take place in fully enclosed buildings with forced ventilation. since mixing the dewatered sludge with amendment will be the primary source of any odors in the project, the mixing building air will be OC( .2 • Application for Weld County Certificate o£ Designation City of Longmont Wastewater Solids Handling Facilities Page 3 separately vented through an organic/soil scrubber. To deal with any odors generated in the composting process, the composting/curing building will contain large, roof-mounted updraft fans to provide high ventilation rates and disperse any odors into the atmosphere even during stable weather conditions. One of the primary directives in the design of the facilities was to make them compatible with the existing and proposed land uses in the area. CERTIFICATE OF DESIGNATION APPLICATION - LONGMONT WASTEWATER SLUDGE COMPOSTING FACILITIES ' The following application information follows the requirements outlined in the the Solid Waste Disposal Site or Facility Application Guidance Document. 1. Topography. A topographic map of the facilities site is shown on sheet 6C-2 of the attached plans. The highest elevation on the property will be 4920 ft. The lowest is at the bottom of the stormwater runoff detention pond at 4905 ft. The surface slope of the site is very gradual from Southwest to Northeast, varying only from 4920 ft. to 4908 ft. over a distance of 800 ft. (approximately 1.50 or less) . 2. Flood plains. There are no flood plains on the site. The St. Vrain River 100-year flood plain lies approximately 250 feet to the Southeast of the Southeast corner of the site. The river is, however, 120 feet below the level of the property and the site slopes away from it. Neither the River nor its floodplain will be impacted by the project. 3. Aquifer recharge. There will be no aquifer recharge on the site. The composting process itself will utilize a mixture of dewatered sludge and amendment that will average 50% solids by weight. All of the composting area will be under a building roof and protected from precipitation. The composting and mixing building floors will be paved with asphalt or concrete. There will be no leachate from the composting process to impact groundwater. Site runoff associated with precipitation will be channeled to an evaporation pond which will be lined with impervious material. Roof runoff will be separately collected in its own storm sewer system and discharged to the St. Vrain River. Sheets 6C-2 through 6C-5 of the attached plans show the runoff control methods to be used on the project. 4. Groundwater Travel Distance. Not applicable. There will be no disposal of waste on the site and no contamination of groundwater. The runoff control methods described in 3. , above, will deal with any site runoff due to precipitation. The soils report which is attached shows the only groundwater that was found was 60 feet below the surface level of the site. I Application for Weld County Certificate of Designation City of Longmont Wastewater Solids Handling Facilities Page 4 5. Isolate Wastes. Not applicable. No wastes will be disposed on the site. The material being composted will be retained in the process for approximately 80 days. volume reduction of the compost will determine the actual curing/storage time. 6. Aquifer Beneficial Use. Not applicable. No aquifers will be impacted by the project. There is no use of groundwater on or anywhere around the site. 7. Groundwater Protection. The only part of the project that deals with groundwater protection is the containment/evaporation pond for site runoff. The pond has been designed to completely contain a 24-hour, 100-year storm event, in accordance with Section 4.2.2 of the state Solid Waste Regulations. The pond is shown on pages 6-C-1 and 6-C-2 of the attached plans. Design information is as follows: Design Storm: 4.5 inches in 24 hours Impervious area: 5.04 acres No infiltration or evaporation was assumed. Pond volume: 782,400 gallons @ 4 ft. depth (pond is 6 ft. deep) 8. Surface water diversion structures. The site runoff will controlled by graded swales around the buildings and curbing around paved areas to collect and channel the runoff to the containment/ evaporation pond described above. The plans and cross-sections for runoff diversion channels are shown on pages 6-C-2 of the attached plans. 9. Geologic Hazards. There are no known or identified geologic hazards on the site. 10. Monitoring Wells. Not applicable. Since no disposal will take place on the site, no groundwater contamination will occur. 11. Adequate Cover. Not applicable; applies to landfills. 12. Final Cover. Not applicable. 13. Water. Water for construction purposes (soil compaction and dust control) will be obtained from the City's water system and hauled to the site. 14. Site description. The attached design report and plan of operation contain a site description. The mailing address for the facilities will be: City of Longmont Water/Wastewater Utilities Division 1100 S. Sherman Longmont, CO 80501 S C .�-27C - .,. 15. Area of site. The total land area of the site is 11.0 acres. No disposal will take place on the site. . Application for Weld County Certificate of Designation City of Longmont Wastewater Solids Handling Facilities Page 5 16. Waste stream. The wastes that will be accepted for treatment by the facilities will be waste sludge generated by the city of Longmont's municipal • wastewater treatment plant. The project is dedicated to the City's sludge, and no other waste streams will be allowed or accepted. It is possible that at startup there will be a need for composted organic material for use as an amendment; in this event, only composted animal or farm waste would be accepted. After startup, the composting operation is designed to utilize recycled finished compost as the amendment. The attached engineering report outlines the proposed composting process. 17. Service Area. The facilities will serve the citizens of the City of Longmont. Access to the site is directly off of Highway 119, three miles east of ' the City. 18. Geologic data. Most of the information requested for this item is for landfill/ disposal purposes. The composting facilities will not involve any disposal or impact on geology. For construction and environmental assessment purposes, information on general geology and a soils report prepared by Empire Laboratories, Inc. , are attached. 19. Geologic Hazards. No geologic hazards have been identified on the site. 20. Surface waters. The only surface water within two miles of the site is the St. Vrain River, which is approximately 250 feet Southeast of the property. The site is 120 feet above the river and slopes to the Northeast. Since there will be no disposal on the site and no leachate of any kind, there will be no impact on the surface water. 21. Aquifer information. Not applicable. The groundwater level on the site was found to be at least 60 feet below the surface when the soil borings for the attached soils report were taken. The project will not impact the groundwater aquifer in any way. 22. Domestic wells. No domestic wells exist within one mile of the site. Potable water in the area is provided by the Left Hand Water Company. 23. Hydrologic properties of aquifer. Not applicable. There will be no disposal of material and no impact on groundwater quality associated with the facilities. 24. Flood plains. a fteR94 See Number 2. , above. 25. Potential impacts to surface and groundwater. There will be no impacts to surface or groundwater due to these facilities. There will be no disposal or fill areas on the site. The building runoff which will be separately channeled to st. Vrain Creek will consist of roof drainage only. j Application for Weld County Certificate of Designation City of Longmont Wastewater Solids Handling Facilities Page 6 26. Groundwater quality. Not applicable. 27. Engineering data. There will be no cover or liner material involved in this project, since it is for sludge processing and treatment, not disposal. Maps for the site are shown on page 6-C-1 of the attached plans. No monitoring wells are proposed for the site since there will be no impact on groundwater. 28. Operational data. The City of Longmont will be operating the sludge composting facilities. The City has been operating a wastewater treatment plant at its present location and treating/disposing o£ waste sludge since the early 1950' s. The current methods of anaerobic digestion and land application have been in place since 1983. Sludge is currently applied to over 2000 acres of land approved by the Colorado Department of Health under the State beneficial use regulations. The City, in • • conjunction with the University of Colorado, has been involved in numerous sludge composting research projects since 1984. These projects, a summary of which is attached, formed the basis for design of the proposed composting facilities. If the facilities are found to be in noncompliance, the City will take responsibility for correcting any problems. Specific persons who will be responsible are: Steven Miller Director of Water/wastewater Utilities 1100 S. Sherman Longmont, CO 80501 Geoff Dolan City Manager City of Longmont 3rd and Kimbark Longmont, CO 80501 The composting operation will be 5 days per week (Monday-Friday) , 8 hours per day. Initially, 4 operators will be assigned to the facilities; at full capacity, 5 will be needed. The attached Plan of Operation outlines the operation philosophy, staffing needs, and budget for the facilities. The attached design report describes the waste volumes to be treated at the facilities. Initial volumes will be 4 dry tons/day, with ultimate (year 2010) capacity rated at 8.5 dry tons/day. Waste sludge will be taken directly from the thickeners and dewatered to between 23% and 25% solids; this equates to 4300 gallons/day initially and 9300 gallons per day at capacity. A sludge quality summary based on the City's monitoring records is also part of the design report. Record-keeping proposed for the composting operation is defined in the attached Plan of Operation. All incoming sludge will be monitored for quantity and quality as required by State and Federal sludge ncorzlz w Application for weld County Certificate of Designation City of Longmont Wastewater Solids Handling Facilities Page 7 regulations. As a minimum, the finished compost must meet the requirements o£ the Colorado Department of Health with respect to stability, pathogen reduction and metals content; testing and record keeping have been established in accordance with these requirements, which were established for land application of sludge for beneficial use. 29. Disposal Cells. Not applicable. 30. Cover Application. Not applicable. 31. Fencing. The fence around the site will be 4-strand barbed wire. A diagram of the fence is shown on page 6-C-2 of the attached plans. No other barriers are planned, because there will be no blowing or drifting material on the site; all mixing and composting operations will take place in enclosed buildings. 33. Nuisance conditions. Nuisance conditions associated with the project may include odors generated from the mixing and composting operations. Mitigation of the odors from the mixing building will be through the use of a soil/compost scrubber. All of the building's air will be routed through the scrubber. Odors from the composting piles will be minimized through proper operation of the process. Forced aeration of the piles will be used, with temperature feedback control of the aeration rate. Each pile will have its own dedicated blower and control system. This will insure that the piles remain aerobic and at the proper temperatures for composting. Operational management of this kind at other composting facilities has been shown to be effective in preventing odors. In addition, the composting building has been designed with positive ventilation for dispersion/dilution of the building air. Upblast fans with a total throughput of 220,000 cfm will be located on the compost building roof. These fans will help to dilute any odor problems, even in stagnant atmospheric conditions. The site for the facilities was also analyzed for meteorological conditions. Wind conditions are favorable for dispersion of any odors and the site is above and away from the St. vrain River corridor which is prone to temperature inversions. Both the natural and constructed features described above are expected to mitigate any odor problems. If odors prove to be a problem in the future, the ventilation systems in the buildings at the site can be easily modified to accept scrubbers. Other problems, such as disease vectors, dust, etc. are not expected to be a problem. The Finished compost stored on the site will be used as amendment for new compost or disposed of on approved agricultural land. It will not be stored long enough to attract any vectors. Active compost piles are at high enough temperatures to eliminate pathogens and any bacterial vectors. Dust in the composting process will be controlled by maintaining pile moisture content and covering each pile with a layer of finished material. Since all operations are enclosed, the chances of any dust or nuisance escaping from the site are very small. If any fugitive dust problems occur, the City will S`Oh7e 1 . Application for Weld County Certificate of Designation City of Longmont Wastewater Solids Handling Facilities Page 8 provide control measures using water trucks or water from the irrigation system to wet down the problem areas. The dust can then be removed by using appropriate attachments on the skidsteers that are part of the composting site equipment. If needed, City street sweepers could also be used to control dust. 34. Windblown debris. Not applicable; no disposal on site. 35. Conceptual plans. An emergency response plan is a requirement of the Federal grant which was used to fund the composting facilities. The plan will be included in the O&M manual for the project, which will be completed and approved by the State and EPA before startup. Emergency procedures will include notification requirements, steps that can be taken to remedy any problems, and an outline of responsibilities and chain of command in an emergency. Typical emergency conditions will include flood, power outage, fire, equipment malfunction or breakdown, etc. None of these situations is expected to be critical due to the location and design of the facilities as well as the stable nature of the composting process. Response to nuisance complaints, including investigation of problems and contact with the public, will be the responsibility of the Solids • Handling Operations Supervisor. The ultimate responsibility for correction of nuisances, however, will lie with the Director of Water/Wastewater Utilities. A staffing plan and chain o£ command is shown in the attached Plan of Operation. Water will only be needed for dust control and washing of equipment. This will be obtained from the Left Hand Water Company and from the St. Vrain River. The latter will also be used to irrigate the landscaping on the site. A joint effort between the City' s Water Quality Division and Solid Waste Division is under way to develop a pump station for bringing irrigation water to the site. Other than site irrigation, minimal amounts of water are expected to be needed for operations on the site (less than 1000 gallons/day) . 36. Closure. Not applicable. The facilities do not include disposal sites which would require closure. If the facilities' useful life is over after the 20-year design period, other uses may be found for the site and the buildings. It is probable that the life of the project will be longer than that initially envisioned, however. P-reFza vino- NA l �.i Solids Management Study` City of Longmont, Colorado • y S, y,,, AN- 4- , y H , .. �� y Q /��`' ',•• 4 tp ,y; .r I \ a. tafkINI , :4 (1/ 4 \ J , 174', . IN, is'.I:1 r �¢' u fir J1 • oil f d �� s , " M� (111\>'t � I i �, , \ a , � r;iI;!i � � C i j � (`�4 1 n Or:•°,4 FACILITY PLANT SUPPLEMENT • SOLIDS MANAGEMENT PLAN for LONGM0NT , COLORADO Ogi L c Nc •0 V CO O tORNv • Project No. 13803 �ladc vestal FsgineenrArti�dec3s pro, LONGMONT, COLORADO SOLIDS MANAGEMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS • A. FINDINGS a B. RECOMMENDATIONS b INTRODUCTION A. BACKGROUND 1 B. PURPOSE AND SCOPE i CHAPTER 1 - CURRENT SITUATION A. DESCRIPTION AND PERFORMANCE OF EXISTING SYSTEM 1-1 1. WASTEWATER TREATMENT 1-1 2. SLUDGE AND SOLIDS HANDLING FACILITIES 1-1 ' a. Preliminary Treatment 1-1 b. Primary Clarifiers 1-4 c. Final Clarifiers 1-4 d. Gravity Sludge Thickener 1-5 e. Anaerobic Digesters 1-5 f. Belt Filter Press 1-6 g. Static Pile Composting 1-7 h. Sludge Oxidation 1-7 1. Land Application 1-9 j. Landfill 1-9 B. INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER PRETREATMENT PROGRAM 1-9 . 1. BACKGROUND 1-g 2. ORGANIC WASTE DISCHARGES 1-10 3. PRIORITY POLLUTANT DISCHARGES 1-11 C. WASTE FLOW AND LOADS 1-15 1. WASTEWATER FLOWS 1-15 2. WASTE LOADS 1-15 TC-1 ^d'0, ^'n Page CHAPTER 1 - CURRENT SITUATION (Continued) D. QUANTITY OF SLUDGE 1-18 E. SLUDGE QUALITY 1-19 1. QUALITY PARAMETERS AND CLASSIFICATION 1-19 F. BENEFICIAL USE AND SOLID WASTE REGULATIONS 1-21 • 1. BENEFICIAL USE OF SLUDGE BY CLASSIFICATION 1-21 a. Grade I Sludge 1-21 b. Grade II Sludge 1-21 c. Grade III Sludge 1-21 d. Grade IV Sludge 1-23 2. STABILIZATION OF SLUDGE 1-23 a. Aerobic Digestion 1-23 b. Anaerobic Digestion 1-24 c. Composting 1-24 3. PROCESS TO FURTHER REDUCE PATHOGENS 1-24 G. BACKGROUND ENVIRONMENT 1-24 1. LAND APPLICATION SITES 1-25 2. COMPOSTING SITE 1-25 3. SLUDGE OXIDATION IN A VERTICAL TUBE REACTOR 1-25 CHAPTER 2 - FUTURE SITUATION A. POPULATION FORECAST 2-1 B. WASTE FLOW AND LOADS 2-2 C. TREATMENT FACILITY STAGING 2-2 0. QUANTITY OF SLUDGE 2-3 E. QUALITY OF SLUDGE 2-4 • CHAPTER 3 - SLUDGE MANAGEMENT ALTERNATIVES A. LAND APPLICATION 3-2 B. COMPOSTING 3-5 C. CO-COMPOSTING 3-19 D. SLUDGE OXIDATION IN A VERTICAL TUBE REACTOR 3-19 TC-2 ne r?m, CHAPTER 3 - SLUDGE MANAGEMENT ALTERNATIVES (Continued) E. ENVIRONMENT ASPECTS OF THE PROPOSED ALTERNATIVES 3-22 1. LAND APPLICATION 3-22 2. COMPOSTING 3-24 • 3. CO-COMPOSTING 3-26 4. SLUDGE OXIDATION IN A VERTICAL TUBE REACTOR 3-26 CHAPTER 4 - ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS A. INTRODUCTION • 4-1 • B. COST OF ALTERNATIVES 4-1 C. PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS 4-1 1. LAND APPLICATION OF DIGESTED SLUDGE AT AGRONOMIC RATES 4-3 2. COMPOSTING OF RAW SLUDGE 4-4 3. SLUDGE OXIDATION IN A VERTICAL TUBE REACTOR 4-4 D. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS 4-5 1. ENERGY CONSUMPTIONS 4-5 2. RELIABILITY 4-5 3. FLEXIBILITY 4-6 4. EXPANDABILITY 4-6 5. OPERATIONAL COMPLEXITY • 4-7 6. LAND AREA REQUIREMENTS 4-7 7. POTENTIAL REGULATORY IMPACT 4-7 8. POTENTIAL LIABILITY TO LONGMONT 4-8 9. ODOR POTENTIAL 4-8 10. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 4-9 E. ALTERNATIVE RANKING 4-17 TC-3 Page CHAPTER 5 - RECOMMENDED SLUDGE MANAGEMENT PLAN A. INTRODUCTION 5-1 B. FACILITY STAGING 5-2 C. OPERATIONAL MODIFICATIONS 5-3 S D. UTILITY MANAGEMENT 5-3 E. LOCAL FUNDING 5-4 F. ENVIRONMENTAL SUMMARY 5-6 LIST OF APPENDICES APPENDIX A LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS APPENDIX B BACKGROUND ENVIRONMENT APPENDIX C HISTORICAL WASTEWATER LOADINGS APPENDIX D LAND APPLICATION AREA REQUIREMENTS APPENDIX E ALTERNATIVE CAPITAL AND OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE COSTS APPENDIX F PUBLIC PARTICIPATION LIST OF TABLES Page TABLE 1 INVENTORY OF SLUDGE AND SOLIDS HANDLING FACILITIES 1-2 TABLE 2 INDUSTRIAL DISCHARGE LIMITATIONS • FOR SELECTED HEAVY METALS 1-12 TABLE 1-3 LIMITATION OF INFLUENT METALS CONCENTRATIONS BASED ON CONTROLLING CATEGORIES 1-14 TABLE 1-4 AVERAGE ANNUAL WASTE FLOW AND LOADS FOR 1982-1986 1-16 SC 0 7 TC-4 LIST OF TABLES (Continued) Page TABLE 1-5 MAXIMUM INFLUENT WASTE LOAD RATIOS FOR 1982-1986 1-17 • TABLE 1-6 CURRENT ANNUAL AVERAGE RAW SLUDGE PRODUCTION 1-18 TABLE 1-7 MAXIMUM CONCENTRATION OF ELEMENTS OR COMPOUNDS FOR CLASSIFICATION OF SLUDGES 1-20 TABLE 1-8 CITY OF LONGMONT, DIGESTED SLUDGE ELEMENT OR COMPOUND CONCENTRATION 1-22 TABLE 2-1 POPULATION PROJECTION FOR LONGMONT'S SERVICE AREA 2-1 TABLE 2-2 PROJECTED ANNUAL AVERAGE WASTE FLOWS AND LOADS 2-2 TABLE 2-3 PROJECTED ANNUAL AVERAGE RAW SLUDGE PRODUCTION 2-3 TABLE 2-4 PROJECTED MAXIMUM MONTH RAW SLUDGE PRODUCTION 2-4 TABLE 3-1 AGRICULTURAL LAND REQUIREMENTS 3-4 TABLE 3-2 PRELIMINARY DESIGN CRITERIA LAND APPLICATION AT AGRONOMIC RATES, 2.4 PERCENT TOTAL SOLIDS, CITY • - OPERATED, ALTERNATIVE A-1 3-6 TABLE 3-3 PRELIMINARY DESIGN CRITERIA LAND APPLICATION AT AGRONOMIC RATES, 3.5 PERCENT TOTAL SOLIDS, CITY- OPERATED, ALTERNATIVE A-2 3-7 • TABLE 3-4 PRELIMINARY DESIGN CRITERIA LAND APPLICATION AT AGRONOMIC RATES, 2.4 PERCENT TOTAL SOLIDS, CONTRACT HAUL, ALTERNATIVE A-3 3-8 fx-3 hg a. TC-5 LIST OF TABLES (Continued) Page TABLE 3-5 PRELIMINARY DESIGN CRITERIA LAND APPLICATION AT AGRONOMIC RATES, • 3.5 PERCENT TOTAL SOLIDS, CONTRACT HAUL, ALTERNATIVE A-4 3-9 TABLE 3-6 PRELIMINARY DESIGN CRITERIA AERATED STATIC PILE COMPOSTING OF RAW SLUDGE WITHOUT AMENDMENT, ALTERNATIVE B-1 3-13 TABLE 3-7 PRELIMINARY DESIGN CRITERIA AERATED STATIC PILE COMPOSTTNG OF RAW SLUDGE WITH AMENDMENT, ALTERNATIVE B-2 3-15 TABLE 3-8 PRELIMINARY DESIGN CRITERIA AERATED WINDROW COMPOSTING OF RAW SLUDGE WITH AMENDMENT, ALTERNATIVE 8-3 3-17 TABLE 3-9 PRELIMINARY DESIGN CRITERIA SLUDGE OXIDATION IN A VERTICAL TUBE REACTOR, ALTERNATIVE C-1 3-21 TABLE 4-1 CITY OF LONGMONT, SLUDGE MANAGEMENT ALTERNATIVES COST SUMMARY 4-2 TABLE 4-2 RANKING OF RELATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS 4-11 TABLE 4-3 RATING OF RELATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS 4-12 TABLE 4-4 ALTERNATIVE RANKING 4-14 • PC05;94, TC-6 LIST OF FIGURES Following Page FIGURE 1-1 UNIT PROCESSES CAPACITY 1-1 • FIGURE 3-1 DAILY MATERIALS FLAW AERATED STATIC PILE COMPOSTING OF RAW SLUDGE WITHOUT AMENDMENT 3-11 FIGURE 3-2 DAILY MATERIAL FLOW AERATED STATIC PILE COMPOSTING OF RAW SLUDGE WITH AMENDMENT 3-11 FIGURE 3-3 DAILY MATERIAL FLOW AERATED WINDROW COMPOSTING OF RAW SLUDGE WITH AMENDMENT 3-11 FIGURE 5-1 DAILY MATERIAL FLOW AERATED STATIC PILE COMPOSTING OR RAW SLUDGE WITHOUT AMENDMENT 5-1 • SCC92" TC-7 • SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. FINDINGS While the City currently has a successful contract hauling and digested sludge disposal program, Longmont has decided to supplement its current Wastewater Facility Plan to incorporate a long-term solids • management program. The plan has been developed to serve the projected population and anticipated average annual sludge generation presented below: POPULATION AND ANNUAL AVERAGE SLUDGE GENERATION PROJECTIONS Primary Sludge Secondary Sludge Total Sludge Year Population Production Production Production (dry ton/day) (dry ton/day) (dry ton/day) 1990 68,400 3.6 3.2 6.8 2000 79,900 4.2 3.8 8.0 2010 89,700 4.5 4.0 8.5 Three major technologies were evaluated in this plan: land applica- tion, composting, and sludge oxidation. From these three primary technologies, the following eight alterna- tives were developed to determine the best overall solids management plan for Longmont: • City-operated land application of digested sludge at a 2.4 percent total solids concentration. • City-operated land application of digested sludge at a 3.5 percent total solids concentration. • • City-contracted land application of digested sludge at a 2.4 percent total solids concentration. • City-contracted land application of digested sludge at a 3.5 percent total solids concentration. • Aerated static pile composting of raw sludge. SCC^2.1, a • • Aerated static pile composting of rate sludge with amendment addition. • Aerated windrow composting of raw sludge with amendment addition. e Sludge oxidation in a vertical tube reactor. • The necessary sludge storage, processing, and staffing requirements were included for all the alternatives to allow the option to be operated as a separate facility, not dependent on the current staff of the waste- ' water treatment facility. B. RECOMMENDATIONS Based on a detailed present worth cost analysis and a summary ranking of the alternatives, construction of an offsite composting facility is the recommended plan. Aerated static pile composting of rav sludge with non-aerated windrow curing will provide the City with a cost-effective, environmentally sound sludge management program. The total project cost, including capital cost, the purchase of equipment, and engineering services, is estimated to be $4,008,000. Staging the purchase of a second front-end loader will reduce this to $3,858,000. The capital cost is based on the construction of a facility to compost the sludge quantities expected during the design year. While the facili- ties will be built to serve the design year population, grant funding will be available only for those facilities required to serve the current population. Using the ratio of current population to design year population, approximately 65 percent of the capital cost, or $2,508,000, is eligible for grant funding. Since composting provides a product which will be used beneficially, it is anticipated that 75 percent funding will be available. At this funding level, the grant amount will be approxi- • mately $1,881,000. The remaining capital cost, S1,977,000, will be provided by the City of Longmont. Funds are currently available in the wastewater utility reserves for the Longmont portion of the capital costs. The actual grant amount and City share will be dependent upon actual construction costs and the determination of current capacity requirements. To aid in the determination of eligible costs, it is recommended that the construction contract be bid on a unit price basis. 0( 0 2 n, b The operation and maintenance costs of the composting facility will impact the residents of Longmont at a level of $0.38 per person per month. This amount has been estimated' based on the anticipated operation and maintenance costs and projected population for the year 2000. While increasing the cost of service, the City of Longmont believes that the nev facilities can be operated without an increase in the current rate • structure. The reader is referred to Chapter 5, RECOMMENDED SLUDGE MANAGEMENT PLAN, for additional details regarding the proposed facilities. • c INTRODUCTION A. BACKGROUND The City of Longmont initiated the development of a solids management plan to provide a long-range program for the management of the sludge generated at the wastewater treatment facility. The criteria set by the • City dictated that the plan be environmentally sound, flexible, reliable, cost-effective, publicly-acceptable, and implementable. Since the plan is intended to supplement the City's current Wastewater Facility Plan, it has been prepared to meet the requirements of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) construction grants program. B. PURPOSE AND SCOPE The Solids Management Plan has included detailed evaluation of three major technologies: land application of digested sludge, composting of raw sludge, and raw sludge oxidation in a vertical ,tube reactor. To evaluate these three major technologies, a total of eight alternatives were analyzed. The eight alternatives are as follow: • City-operated land application of digested sludge at a 2.4 percent total solids concentration. • City-operated land application of digested sludge at a 3.5 percent total solids concentration. • City-contracted land application of digested sludge at a 2.4 percent total solids concentration. • City-contracted land application of digested sludge at a 3.5 percent total solids concentration. • Aerated static pile composting with non-aerated windrow curing of raw sludge without amendment addition. • • Aerated static pile composting with non-aerated windrow curing of raw sludge with amendment addition. • Aerated windrow composting of raw sludge with amendment addition. • Sludge oxidation in a vertical tube reactor. Oren"4, i In addition to evaluating these alternatives, the City utility staff is currently cooperating with the Community Development Department staff who are analyzing the feasibility of co-composting. If preprocessing of solid waste is deemed cost-effective, the wastewater utility staff has expressed a willingness to use the material as a composting amendment. If additional facilities are required to store and process the solid waste, • the City would fund these facilities from sources outside the wastewater utility. The evaluation included a detailed present worth analysis together with the ranking of alternatives based on non-monetary criteria such as environmental impact, reliability, operational complexity, and others. Following the evaluation, the recommended plan was identified and developed. In order to project future sludge production, identify alternatives and sites, perform the evaluation, and develop a recommended plan, a solids management group vas formed. The group included members from the City's utility engineering and operations staff, representatives of the University of Colorado at Boulder, and the City's consultants. Regularly-scheduled workshops were held to streamline report develop- ment and meet the completion date required by the Colorado Department of Health for obtaining a position on the fundable portion of the Fiscal Year 1988 priority list. The workshops provided a forum for all members of the group to offer input and work together so that the report would address all the major issues of concern to the City of Longmont. • ii CHAPTER 1 CURRENT SITUATION A. DESCRIPTION AND PERFORMANCE OF EXISTING SYSTEMS 1. WASTEWATER TREATMENT. The Longmont Wastewater Treatment Facility vas originally designed to treat 8.2 million gallons of sewage per day • (mgd). The expanded capacity of the facility is currently about 11.6 mgd. The plant was designed for annual average five-day biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and total suspended solids (TSS) loadings of 15,840 pounds per day (lbs/day) and 12,960 lbs/day, respectively. Primary treatment at the site consists of mechanical screening and aerated grit removal, followed by primary clarification. Secondary treatment begins with first-stage trickling filters. Following the first-stage trickling filters, the flow is split and the wastewater receives further treatment in either the second-stage trickling filter or the rotating biological contactors. The trickling filter effluent then flows through the solids contact tank, final clarifiers, and chlorine contact basin where it joins the rotating biological contactor effluent prior to discharge into the St. Vrain Creek. Plant performance records have been reviewed for the period from 1982 through 1986 and are attached to this report as Appendix C. The data indicate that the facility has consistently met the effluent limitations contained in the City's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. 2. SLUDGE AND SOLIDS HANDLING FACILITIES. This section provides a description of the sludge handling facilities at the Longmont VUTP. Included is a discussion of the performance potential for each of the major unit processes, a graphical depiction of which is presented on Figure 1-1. • The design criteria for each of the sludge and solids handling facilities are presented in Table 1-1. a. Preliminary Treatment. Preliminary treatment consists of two bar screens, two aerated grit basins, and a comminutor. The bar screens are mechanically cleaned, and the screenings are dropped to a belt conveyor. A hand-cleaned bar screen is available to accommodate bypass flow when necessary. All screenings are transported by truck to a landfill. 1-1 �'� : :3 A N N I-- A al I. LL.L \ nC an MM O O C Hu. G f` N %J O ICI = CO CD CO \ CO I 1 0J 1 00 • g O atCC 0 N N q7 g+ S M• lV O • 10 - a {O a c IA O CO • O. u _ cc n • — C — CO s 10 •CD r-- a - -----r I'll ~ s O . _ RI . V • _ 0 O � J W rr�r�r��r�rr w e O LL • — mz. CO •• �"• • ." g v 0 Z < cc O J • - i a <o y L r z 'Ato Y! h • ` a as z V N y m A - D Cr W Cia U.1 C. i mW •�WQQ� tL � gig oh- LLr~iOiO WWFANnrnM�4.. Z <r CJ W .1 we 2 s � wx O a a LI w c� v'�r- c o o o. 9rii 1-1 =WTI f OF =Oat AID DDrmD NADUNO Fa ILITISs Item Description Mechanical Der Screens Mgr of Ihata 2 • Sagan Width, ft 4 Clear Spacing. in. 1 Sand-Cleaned Dar Screen Number of pates 1 Screen Width. ft 4 Clear Spacing, in. 1/4 Grit Chamber lumber of Unite 2 ,Typo aerated Capacity. mgd 21.6 Orit Amp Dumber of Unite 2 Type Centrifugal. constant speed Capacity, each SOO gpa at 45 ft TAI primary Clarifier■ Rabat of Units 1 Dimensions 1 at S5 ft diametor, 6'4" SID: 1 at SO ft disaster. 7'-Se SW; 1 at 70 ft diasater. S'-2" SID Total Surface area, ere ft 14,550 Primary Sludge Amps Number of Units 1 Type antrituoal Capacity 2 constant speed at 240 gym at 45 ft ITS: 1 variable speed at 100 ups at 12 ft TtM Final Clarifiers number of Mita 2 Dimensions. each 120 ft diametric. 17'-4" S D. Kth 40 ft diameter flocculation soma Tota1 Surface area, VI ft 22.620 • Secondary Sludge Wasting Funp lumber of wits 2 Types Centrifugal, variable speed Capacity. each 500 gpn at 16 ft TEO Scum Raps Number of wits 1 ,gyp positive displae4aant, ccestant speed Capacity 75 gpm at 125 ft TEE 1-2 (•�^mow TABU 1-1 MMOON Of SLDDOe JWD SOLIDS SANDtdBO fACIL1113 (CentlNlMd) Item Description SCrw Puma • Member of Onto 2 TYDe 60-Snob diameter spiral Capacity, each, ad 13.7 sa mration win Pumps Mahar of wit■ 3 7ypo Centrifugal variable aped Capacity, each 2,7$0 gpm at 42 ft ?De • sludge Thlakener Member of wit■ 1 Clatter, ft 33 Side Inter Depth, ft 10 Cone section Height, ft 3 Thickened eludes Saps Miter of Omits 2 7190 Messina displaeeaent, lobe rotor Capacity, each, fps 220 Anarchic Dictators (smut of Omits 2 Operational Status 1 heated, with floating mart 1 not heated, with fixed cave Cleated, ft 43 Side lister Depth, ft 27 C17ea Section Height, ft d Digested Sludges 2rahsfor Pap Member of Volts 1 . 71D• Double piston, Doeltlw displacemont Capacity 130 ppm at 123 ft 1La Belt filter Sass Muttat of Omits l Type Cantilever • Sise, meter 1.2 Capacity, 9a1/min 100 Cake Solids, percent 30 to 10 �'A 1-3 Grit removal is accomplished with aerated grit chambers, grit washers, cyclone degritters, and grit screw collectors. The grit removal system has a rated design capacity of 21.4 mgd. The grit is hauled vith the screenings to a landfill. b. Primary Clarifiers. Secondary sludge is wasted to the headworks and combines with the incoming sewage just prior to the equalization basin. • The combined wastewater stream is settled in three primary clarifiers of different sizes. The total surface area of the clarifiers is 14,555 square feet (sq ft). The present operating strategy for the primary clarifiers is to minimize the sludge blanket in any of the basins. As a consequence, a relatively thin sludge (less than 2,000 mg/1) is pumped from the clarifiers to the gravity thickener. This operational strategy has been adopted as a means of keeping the contents of the gravity thickener "fresh". As seen on Figure 1-1, the primary clarifiers have been rated as having the capacity to handle plant flows up to 11.6 mgd. This rating was based on a surface overflow rate of 800 gpd/sq ft, with all three clarifiers on-line. Beyond this flow rate, it vas projected that the performance of the clarifiers could be expected to deteriorate. c. Final Clarifiers. Secondary sludge produced by the trickling filter/solids contact process is removed from the wastewater stream in the two final clarifiers. Underflow from the final clarifiers is pumped to the reseration basin, where it is either "wasted" to the headworks or returned to the solids contact process. As with the primary clarifiers, the current operating strategy is to avoid carrying a sludge blanket in the final clarifiers. The clarifiers are 120 feet in diameter and have a 40-foot diameter center well. The center wells serve as flocculation zones for the biological sludge and are, therefore, gently mixed. • The potential capacity of the final clarifiers was projected using a surface overflow rate of 600 gpd/sq ft. This loading resulted in a rating of 12.1 mgd, as illustrated on Figure 1-1. The clarifiers have a total surface area of 22,600 sq ft, of which 2,500 sq ft represents the surface 1-4 5)CO5;21?' area o£ the center wells. Since quiescent conditions are required for proper clarification, the center well surface area was not included in the calculations for determining surface overflow capacity. d. Gravity Sludge Thickener. Combined primary and secondary sludge is pumped from the three primary clarifiers to the gravity thickener. The current operating strategy for the thickener is to carry a 3- to 4-foot • sludge blanket. If the blanket is much deeper than this, odor problems may develop during the summer months. However, if the depth of blanket is less than 3 feet, the sludge rake does not move a uniform sludge to the hopper. Thickened sludge is pumped to either the anaerobic digesters or to the belt filter press for further processing. The capacity rating for the gravity thickener was projected based on a • solids loading of 15 lbs/day/sq ft. Given 960 sq ft of thickener surface area, a solids loading of 14,400 lbs/day could be processed. The weir plates of the thickener are badly rusted and poorly attached. This condition must be corrected for the potential capacity to be realized. • e. Anaerobic Digesters. A portion of the gravity thickened sludge is pumped to anaerobic digesters for stabilization. The Longmont WTF has two anaerobic digesters of equal size and currently operates them in series. One of the digesters has a floating cover, whereas the other has a fixed cover. The capacity of the present heat exchanger is only sufficient to heat one of the two units; therefore, one of the digesters is primarily used for storage. No supernating of the digested sludge is practiced. The high-rate digesters are fitted with oversized mixing/recirculation systems and have a demonstrated capability of achieving adequate stabiliza- tion when operated at a hydraulic retention time (HRT) of 15 days and a temperature of 95 F. Therefore, in projecting the potential capacity of the digesters, a minimum HRT of 15 days vas used. Capacity of only the O heated digester vas used in the evaluation. The maximum operating volume of the heated digester is 333,000 gallons. For this volume, a HRT of 15 days dictates a thickened sludge feed capacity of 22,200 gpd. Thickened sludge production averaged 17,800 gpd at a plant flow of 7.87 mgd during the period of May 1, 1986 to March 31, 1987. SCOn q 1-5 Assuming similar plant influent characteristics in the future, a rated capacity for the anaerobic digester of 9.8 mgd was projected by proportioning. As an option, the rated capacity of the digesters could be effectively doubled by providing additional heat exchanger capacity for the second digester. f. Belt Filter Press. The City's 1.2-meter belt filter press is • currently used as a backup to the anaerobic digesters and as a devatering process for the pilot-scale composting project. It can be fitted with either fabric or steel belts and is capable of producing a cake with a total solids concentration of 30 percent. The performance of the belt press has been found to be dependent upon the quantity and type of polymer added and the loading rate and concentration of feed sludge. The belt filter press was rated by the manufacturer at 2,000 lbs/hr throughput (100 gpm at 4 percent total solids). Although a lover loading should be used for design of new facilities, the 2,000 lbs/hr rating was used in projecting the potential capacity of the existing press. For the purposes of projection, press operation vas assumed to be eight hours per day, five days per week. At a rated capacity of 2,000 lbs/hr, the press could dewater 80,000 pounds of thickened sludge per week, or 11,430 lbs/day for a seven-day average. This rating assumes that it would be possible to deliver 24 hours of sludge production to the belt press within an eight-hour period. This is not possible currently since thickener performance deteriorates if sludge is held to match this schedule. Additional sludge storage facilities would be required to optimize the capacity of the belt press without changing the operational parameters. As an option, it may be possible to retrofit one or both of the digesters to serve as storage facilities, since full use of the belt press would negate the need for anaerobic digestion. If this is done, • it will be necessary to correct the groundwater infiltration problem experienced in the digesters when they are operated at a liquid depth of less than 15 feet. c`re`; " �� 1 1-6 g. Static Pile Composting. Raw sludge composting at the Longmont VVTP is presently operating at a pilot-scale. Thickened sludge is pumped to the belt filter press one or two days per month for dewatering. The dewatered sludge cake is combined with recycled compost in a one to one ratio to form new compost pile core material. An equal amount of recycled compost is then added as cover material to minimize odors. • Positive aeration is provided for 10 minutes of every 30 minutes during the first 14 days of the composting cycle. The pile temperature is monitored to achieve a minimum pile temperature of 40 C for five days of the composting cycle. Once these conditions are met, operation is switched to a 14-day drying cycle. During this period, positive aeration is provided for 30 minutes of every hour. Since the composting project is pilot-scale, a potential capacity rating has not been projected. h. Sludge Oxidation in Vertical Tube Reactor. In the vertical tube reactor (VTR) process, oxygen is combined with sludge and pumped into an annular space created by the concentric tubes. The static head of the mile-deep column of liquid sludge creates the required high pressure for the process. The high pressure, in conjunction with dissolved oxygen and the heat of reaction, results in wet air oxidation of the sludge. Oxidation begins when the temperature in the reactor reaches approxi- mately 180 C. When temperatures of approximately 204 C to 280 C are attained, autogenic oxidation of the sludge is reported to occur. Once autogenic oxidation begins, the heat exchanger used initially to warm the sludge may be reversed to recover heat from the process. The oxidized sludge stream is returned to the surface through the outer annular space. Presently, the VTR facility at the Longmont WWTP is not in operation. The facility was operated intermittently for approximately 18 months during 1984-1985 as a demonstration project. • The Longmont WWTP average sludge production averaged 5 to 6 dry tons per day during the demonstration. Initially, the facility was operated by mixing air with the raw sludge prior to pumping it into the reactor. The results indicated an inadequate supply of oxygen was available to produce the level of COD reduction originally predicted. By switching to a pure oxygen enrichment system, COD loadings were increased vhile obtaining the 1-7r ^7 A predicted COD reductions. It vas also determined that a minimum of 10 to 11 dry tons per day of sludge vas required for the process to operate sutogenously. The sludge quantity produced by the Longmont WTP vas insufficient to maintain the operation at the desired capacity with the increased COD loading capability. Additional sludge from surrounding municipalities vas O hauled to the Longmont site to increase the loading rate. Throughout the demonstration, the raw sludge quantity treated ranged from 5 dry tons per day to 30 dry tons per day. Odor control vas not a significant problem at the Longmont facility, except during startup periods when lov process temperatures resulted in inadequate oxidation of some odorous organic compounds. Once the process vas established, odors were not noticeable. Effluent from the VTR vas pumped to a settling basin equipped vith plate separators where the ash vas separated from the effluent. Chemical analyses of the ash shoved lov metals concentrations, and it vas not considered a hazardous vaste. The settled ash slurry vas pumped at approximately 5 to 6 percent total solids to onsite storage basins or into tanker trucks and hauled to a privately-owned disposal site. The liquid effluent vas returned to the vastevater treatment plant at the trickling filters. Although the BOD loading on the plant vas increased by 20 to 25 percent, plant operation vas not significantly impacted. Slightly higher COD and ammonia levels vere noticed in the plant effluent, but no increase vas observed that led to a violation of NPDES discharge permit. The major maintenance item for the Longmont VTR facility vas the reactor interior where inorganic solids formed a scale that vas removed periodically vith an acid wash. The reactor capacity vas reduced if this scale vas not removed. . Performance of the VTR process vas measured by the reduction of COD in the sludge. The COD reduction goal vas approximately 80 percent. The measured COD reduction ranged from 60 to 66 percent vhen air vas used as an oxygen source in the Longmont facility. Use of pure oxygen resulted in COD reductions of approximately 80 percent. nC0r^1 a 1-8 Due to the demonstration nature of the VTR facility, it vas opera- ' tional about 67 percent of the time. This represented a greater amount of downtime than would be expected for a. fully operational plant. Some of the causes of downtime included equipment maintenance, descaling of the reactor, reactor fouling by organic materials, and lack of sufficient sludge for processing. • • 1. Land Application. Anaerobically digested sludge is land applied at a total solids concentration of 2.4 percent by a private contractor. The liquid sludge is hauled by tanker truck to the application sites where • it is surface applied. Crops that are commonly grown on the sludge-amended soil include wheat and corn. The sludge is applied at an agronomic rate that meets the crop nitrogen requirements. j. Landfill. The landfill operation serves as a backup to the land application program and the pilot-scale composting program. Lime stabilized raw sludge that has been dewatered by the belt filter press is landfilled when land application or composting is 'not feasible. The sludge cake is trucked to the landfill using City-owned and operated equipment. B. INDUSTRIAL VASTEVATER PRETREATMENT PROGRAM 1. BACKGROUND. The City of Longmont has developed a pretreatment program to control the impact of industrial waste discharges. The program enables the City to prevent the introduction of pollutants into the municipal wastewater treatment that could either: (1) interfere with the plant performance, (2) pass through the various unit processes untreated and enter into the receiving stream, or (3) cause interference with sludge use or disposal. A list has been compiled of all businesses in the City that fall within any of the industrial categories that are subject to the United States • Envrionmental Protection Agency (EPA) Categorical Pretreatment Standards. The individual businesses on this list are sent an industrial wastewater pretreatment questionnaire that requests information pertaining to items such as the water usage, products manufactured, and the types of pollutants F.Y.CR7 n 1-9 that might be found in the waste discharge. As a result of this ongoing industrial wastewater survey, businesses have been characterized as follows: • Non-SIgnificant Industrial Users. These industries are con- sidered to have little potentiar for discharging vastes detrimental to the wastewater treatment plant. • • Significant Industrial Users. These industries are considered to ave the potrntia fo�ischarging wastes detrimental to the wastevater treatment plant. These wastes are considered to be detrimental because of either an excessive concentration of organics (BOD5 or suspended solids) or the presence of priority pollutants. • Commercial Users. These businesses have the potential of dis- charging either BOD5 or suspended solids in excess of the City's surcharge limits. They are typically businesses that handle foods (i.e., restaurants, grocery stores, and convenience stores). 2. ORGANIC WASTE DISCHARGES. The City has established industrial waste surcharge limits and surcharge rates as a means of controlling excessive BOD5 and suspended solids discharges. The surcharge limit is 300 mg/1 for BOD5 and 330 mg/1 for suspended solids. A surcharge is assessed in addition to the normal sewer rates and use charges at discharge levels above these values. Longmont Foods, a turkey processing plant, has been responsible for a significant portion of the historic organic load to the wastewater treat- ment plant. The 8005 load from Longmont Foods represented 39 percent of the vastewater treatment plant total BOD load in 1982. Longmont Foods installed a primary pretreatment system in the summer of 1983 and reduced their BOD5 contribution to 25 percent of the total wastevater treatment • plant load for that year. The primary components of the pretreatment system consist of screening, pH neutralization, and dissolved air flotation. Proper operation of the pretreatment system was expected to reduce the Longmont Foods BOD5 load to 10 percent of the vastevater treatment plant total. Although these levels have not been achieved on a consistent basis, SCO-q?^, 1-10 the Longmont Foods BOD5 contribution has averaged only 15 percent of the treatment plant total since April 1986. The total BOD5 contribution from other Longmont businesses is 3 to 5 percent of the treatment plant total, with the load from no other single business considered to be significant. 3. PRIORITY POLLUTANT DISCHARGES. To date, the City of Longmont has only established discharge limitations for the heavy metal priority • pollutants. Presently, no industry in the City discharges organic priority pollutants at a concentration or mass loading that is considered to be detrimental to either the wastewater treatment plant or stream quality. The City will establish limitations for that category of priority pollu- tants if and when the discharge of organic chemicals becomes a significant problem. The City's major sources of heavy metal discharges are electroplating industries. Centerline Circuits, a manufacturer of printed circuit boards, is responsible for two-thirds of the total waste flow from metal- discharging industries. In establishing the permit limitations for the discharge of heavy metals, Longmont used the levels set forth for the electroplating point source category in the General Pretreatment Regula- tions in the Clean Water Act of 1977. The daily maximum and average maximum concentrations for selected heavy metals are presented in Table 1-2. The City elected to apply the limitations for electroplating industries to all industrial dischargers of heavy metals. These limita- tions provided considerable leniency to non-electroplating industries, since the permissible concentration levels are higher than for any other industrial category. Once these limitations had been established, the City used three criteria to ensure that heavy metal mass loadings were not detrimental to • the wastewater treatment plant or its receiving stream. One criterion vas that the level of pollutant should not result in a violation of the Stream Water Quality Standards. Although criterion vas that heavy metal concen- trations should be lov enough that the treatment plant sludge meets the Grade II category for the disposal of sludge on agricultural lands, as defined by the State of Colorado Domestic Sewage Sludge Regulations. The 1-11 • TABLE 1-2 INDUSTRIAL DISCHARGE LIMITATIONS FOR SELECTED HEAVY METALS Daily Average Pollutant Maximum Maximum i715_ (mgt) Cadmium 1.2 0.7 Chromium 7.0 4.0 Copper 4.5 2.7 Lead 0.6 0.4 Nickel 4.1 2.6 Zinc 4.2 2.6 e PCQw?4 1-12 third criterion was that the level of pollutant should not cause an inter- ference with the performance of any unit process at the wastewater treatment plant. In reviewing the plant data, the Pretreatment Division could not identify any occasions when process performance vas limited by the presence of heavy metals. Therefore, the two categories by which metal loadings to • the treatment plant were assessed were their impact on stream water quality and land application of sludge. The Pretreatment Division determined the maximum permissible metal loadings for obtaining compliance in each category by using EPA formulae and methods. The category which required the lowest influent concentration of a given metal was considered to be the controlling category. Table 1-3 presents a list of the controlling category for each o£ six heavy metals and the maximum permissible influent concentration for that metal and category. Heavy metal loadings associated with the discharge of domestic waste were estimated by assuming that weekend flows were essentially non-industrial. The metal loadings so determined were taken to be the constant, baseline load. Industrial metal loadings were conservatively estimated by assuming that each metal-discharging industry would discharge at the maximum concentration alloyed by their existing permit. By adding the industrial metal loads to the baseline loads, and dividing by the plant flow, it was found that the influent concentration of each heavy metal should be less than the maximum permissible concentration set forth in Table 1-3. On the basis o£ these calculations, it vas decided that the present industrial discharge limitations were satisfactory and required no adjustments. Several industries are presently meeting their permit vith ease and could perhaps meet more stringent limitations. However, the Pretreatment • Division has adopted a "good neighbor" policy in that they do not request lower permit levels as long as the controlling categories (land applica- tion and stream water quality) are met with the existing limitations in effect. Most industries have installed or upgraded their pretreatment nr ^7� 1-13 • TABLE 1-3 LIMITATION OF INFLUENT METAL CONCENTRATIONS BASED ON CONTROLLING CATEGORIES Maximum Permissible Metal Concentration Controlling Categories (mg/1) Cadmium 0.0056 Land Application and Stream Water Quality Chromium 0.48 Stream Water Quality Copper 0.18 Land Application Lead 0.24 Land Application Nickel 0.23 Land Application Zinc 0.50 Land Application s 1-14 systems since the discharge limitations vent into effect. As a result, the wastewater treatment plant has seen a gradual improvement in influent, effluent, and sludge metal concentrations. C. WASTE FLOW AND LOADS 1. WASTEWATER FLOWS. The annual average wastewater flows for 1982 • through 1986 are presented in Table 1-4. A review of the data shows a 22 percent increase from 1982 to 1983, which had the highest recorded average flow for the period. Flows were virtually the same during 1984 and 1985, 7.40 mgd and 7.37 mgd, respectively, and increased slightly to 7.54 mgd in 1986. 2. WASTE LOADS. The principal design waste loads are BOD5 and TSS. Table 1-4 summarizes the annual average raw wastewater BOD5 and TSS loadings from 1982 through 1986. The loadings are presented in both dry tons per day (tons/day) and pounds per million gallons (lbs/mg) of influent flow. A review of the data presented in Table 1-4 indicates that both the BOD5 and TSS loading rates, expressed as lbs/mg, dropped between 1983 and 1984. The reductions were approximately 15 percent for both BOD5 and TSS. It is believed that this reduction can be attributed to the pretreat- ment program implemented by the City. Following this reduction, the BOD5 and TSS loads averaged 1,460 and 1,150 lbs/mg, respectively, for the period 1984 through 1986. In addition to determining the annual average waste loads, plant data were utilized to estimate waste load peaking factors. Each monthly average waste load vas divided by the annual average to estimate the peaking factor. This analysis was performed for each month from 1982 through 1986 for both BOD5 and TSS. All monthly/annual average load ratios are presented in Appendix C. The maximum influent waste load ratios for each • year are presented in Table 1-5. A review of the information presented in Table 1-5 indicates that the peak influent waste load ratios are 1.29 and 1.53 for RODS and TSS, respectively. The average of the maximum for the five years of data are 1.22 for BOD5 and 1.30 for TSS. E'Q�? 1-15 • TABLE 1-4 AVERAGE ANNUAL WASTE FLOW AND LOADS FOR 1982-1986 • Year Flow Raw Influent BOD5 Raw Influent TSS . (mgd) (tons/day) (lbs/mg) (tons/day) (lbs/mg) 1982 6.37 5.50 1,750 4.33 1,380 1983 7.79 6.60 1,720 5.16 1,350 1984 7.40 5.29 1,46'0 4.19 1,140 1985 7.37 5.37 1,480 4.40 1,210 1986 7.54 5.37 1,440 4.10 1,110 • nee: ?;A, 1-16 • TABLE 1-5 MAXIMUM INFLUENT WASTE WAD RATIOS FOR 1982-1986 Maximum Influent Waste Load Ratios* Year BOD5 TSS 1982 1.19 (Mar) 1.53 (Feb) 1983 1.29 (Jan) 1.38 (Jan) 1984 1.19 (Apr) 1.21 (Feb) 1985 1.16 (Mar) 1.13 (Apr) 1986 1.28 (Oct) 1.23 (Apr) *Ratio of monthly average load to annual average load. • ”re,7,4 1-17 D. QUANTITY OP SLUDGE As discussed in Section C, the average flows and waste loads to the treatment facility have been compiled for the period from 1982 through 1986. During this period, there were no records of the amount of sludge discharged from the gravity thickener and entering either the digester, the Dewatering Building, or the VTR sludge oxidation unit. • The sludge collected within the treatment plant for the period vas estimated from records maintained for contract hauling, sludge dewatering, and VTR operation. It has been estimated from these records that the annual average total ray sludge production under the current operating conditions is 1.0E pounds per pound of BOD5 removed across the entire plant. The annual average secondary sludge generation is estimated to be 0.72 pound of secondary sludge per pound of BOD5 removed in the secondary system. Using the sludge generation rates described above and the waste loads currently being experienced at the treatment facility, the average annual raw sludge generation for 1987 is 5.9 dry tons per day. The production rate is divided between primary and secondary sludge as shown in Table 1-6. TABLE 1-6 CURRENT ANNUAL AVERAGE RAV SLUDGE PRODUCTION Primary Sludge Secondary Sludge Total Sludge Year Production Production Production (dry tons/day) (dry tons/day) (dry tons/day) 1987 3.1 2.8 5.9 Further discussion of the sludge production criteria can be found in • Chapter 2, FUTURE SITUATION. rCOCZ, 1-18 E. SLUDGE QUALITY 1. QUALITY PARAMETERS AND CLASSIFICATION. The quality of a sludge is measured by its physical and chemical composition. Nutrient, metal, and toxic organic concentrations within the sludge are often determining factors which dictate the final use or disposal option. The extent to which these parameters impact the environment determines the acceptable • method(s) of reuse and disposal. Low heavy metal concentrations are desirable for all disposal alter- natives, while nutrient concentrations can be beneficial or detrimental, depending upon the disposal method chosen. A sludge with low nutrient concentrations is unattractive as a fertilizer, while sludges with very high nutrient concentrations can contribute to groundwater quality degradation associated with leaching of nitrogen. The Colorado Department of Health (CDH), along with the EPA. has adopted regulations and guidelines addressing sludge quality. The current EPA regulations limit the maximum cumulative loading of cadmium to the soil • and dictate groundwater quality criteria that must be maintained. The CDH has prepared criteria to classify sludge, which allows for beneficial use dependent upon its classification. The CDH criteria for classification of sludge are shown in Table 1-7. Note that each value listed is the maximum allowable concentration, and i£ any one constituent is over the limit, the sludge is graded accordingly. Sludges with concentrations higher than those indicated for the Grade III classification are classified Grade IV. The CDH criteria further state that: "The classification of sludge generated by a given producer shall be determined by the results of a six-month average of all analyses of that sludge performed by the producer and/or the Department." • The City of Longmont 1986 sludge characteristics have been reported on a monthly basis and include both six-month and annual averages. The informa- tion for 1985 and 1984, however, includes only annual averages. For the purpose of this discussion, annual averages will be used. n�O 21° 1-19 • • TABLE 1-7 MAXIMUM CONCENTRATION OF ELEMENTS OR COMPOUNDS FOR CLASSIFICATION OF SLUDGES Grade Cd(1) Cu(1) Pb(1) Ni(1) yn(1) PCB(2) I 25 625 1,000 250 1,250 3 II 70 1,650 2,500 650 3,325 10 III 125 3,125 5,000 1,250 6,250 10 (1)Expressed as dry weight basis (milligram of element per kilogram of sludge). (2)Expressed as wet weight basis (parts per million). • �('v^7^, 1-20 Table 1-8 shows the heavy metal data for 1984 through 1986, which indicates that the quality of the sludge has steadily improved since implementation of the pretreatment program. Comparing the concentrations to the CDH classification criteria indicates that the City's sludge has improved from Grade III in 1984 to Grade II in 1986, with copper the determining element in all cases. The Industrial Pretreatment Program • instituted by the City has reduced copper concentrations from 2,130 mg/kg in 1984 to 630 mg/kg in 1986, while the remaining elements have been below the maximum concentration for Grade I sludge in all three years. Through July 1987, the City of Longmont sludge has continually met the Grade I criteria for the year. F. BENEFICIAL USE AND SOLID WASTE REGULATIONS 1. BENEFICIAL USE OF SLUDGE BY CLASSIFICATION. The sludge classifi- cation is extremely important since it dictates the acceptable beneficial uses of the sludge. The following paragraphs summarize the uses allowed for each classification of stabilized sludge. Note that some form of stabilization must be performed prior to using the sludge, and a discussion of stabilization techniques will follow the beneficial use descriptions. a. Grade I Sludge. Dewatered, Grade I sludge solids between 16 and 40 percent, that has been stored for a one-year period or has undergone a Process to Further Reduce Pathogens (PFRP), may be applied to any land for any beneficial use. All other Grade I sludge may be applied only to agricultural or disturbed lands. The CDR defines disturbed land as that from which vegetation, topsoil, or overburden has been removed. b. Grade II Sludge. Grade II sludge may be applied only to agri- cultural or disturbed lands. c. Grade III Sludge. Grade III sludge may be applied only to dis- c turbed lands or agricultural lands on which no food chain crops vill be planted. Following the application of a Grade III sludge, cultivation of a food chain crop is forbidden for a three-year period. The CDH defines food chain crops as those crops grown for human consumption or feed for animals whose products are consumed by humans. Cali'Cc?,n 1-21 TABLE 1-8 CITY OF LONGMONT DIGESTED SLUDGE ELEMENT OR COMPOUND CONCENTRATIONS (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (2) Limiting Year Cd Cu Pb Ni 2n PCB Grade Element 1984 4 2,130 430 140 720 N/A XII Cu 1985 12 1,840 390 220 810 N/A III Cu 1986 11 630 180 39 1,150 N/A IX Cu (1)Expressed as dry weight basis (milligram of element per kilogram of sludge). (2)Expressed as weight basis (parts per million). • nrc7, 1-22 d. Grade IV Sludge. Grade IV sludge may not be used for a bene- ficial purpose and must be disposed of as a solid waste in accordance with the requirements of the Solid Wastes Disposal Sites and Facilities Act, C.R.S. 1973, 30-20-101 et se2., as amended. 2. STABILIZATION OF SLUDGE. As stated previously, any sludge applied to the land for beneficial use must be stabilized. The CDR has set • minimum stabilization criteria for aerobic digestion, anaerobic digestion, and composting. The criteria for each stabilization method have been summarized as follows. a. Aerobic Digestion. Sludge receiving aerobic digestion will be considered stabilized if it meets any of the following criteria: (1) Volatile solids reduction is 38 percent or greater. (2) The oxygen uptake rate of undiluted sludge is either: (a) mg 02/hr/gm volatile suspended solids (VSS), dependent upon temperature, as follows: Less than or equal to 'to 2.0 mg 02/hr/gm VSS at greater than 20 C. Less than or equal to 1.3 mg 02/hr/gm VSS at 18-20 C. Less than or equal to 1.0 mg 02/hr/gm VSS at 15-18 C. Less than or equal to 0.7 mg OZ/hr/gm VSS at 0-15 C. (b) mg 02/1/hr, as follows: Less than or equal to 10 mg 02/1/hr at 20 C. (3) Digested sludge volatile solids content is less than 65 percent. (4) Mean Cell Residence Time (sludge age) from an aeration system(s) is at least 20 days. • F.TC5:"2 1-23 b. Anaerobic Digestion. Sludge receiving anaerobic digestion vill be considered stabilized if it meets any of the folloving criteria: (1) Volatile solids reduction is 38 percent or greater. (2) Volatile acids content is less than 500 mg/l. • (3) Digested sludge volatile solids content is less than 65 percent. c. Composting. Sludge that has received some form of composting will be considered stabilized if it meets any of the following criteria: (1) Volatile solids reduction is 38 percent or greater. (2) Volatile solids content is less than 65 percent (3) Sludge total composting and curing time is a minimum of 80 days. (4) Sludge is maintained at minimum operating conditions of 40 C for five days. For four hours during this period, the temperature shall exceed 55 C. 3. PROCESSES TO FURTHER REDUCE PATHOGENS. In addition to stabili- zation, Grade I sludges that are to be distributed for use on any land for any beneficial purpose must undergo a PFRP. The EPA lists the criteria for a number of pathogen reduction processes in Appendix II of their Criteria for Classification of Solid Waste Disposal Facilities and Practices, CFR 40, Part 257. The processes described by the EPA include composting, heat drying, heat treatment, thermophilic aerobic digestion, beta ray irradiation, gamma ray irradiation, and pasteurization. G. BACKGROUND ENVIRONMENT . An assessment has been prepared to describe the impact the proposed • alternatives will have on the existing Longmont environment. Sites for land application, composting, and sludge oxidation in a vertical tube reactor have been evaluated. nCer72^ 1-24 1. LAND APPLICATION SITES. Nine locations have been identified as prospective sites for the land application of digested sludge. The sites were selected based on the following criteria: • Sites within a 5-mile radius of the VVTP, and • Sites currently permitted or within the permitting process for • the land application of sludge during 1987, or • Sites currently engaged in dryland farming operations that might be suitable for future land application sites, or • Previous land application sites, compiled from year 1983. 2. COMPOSTING SITE. The remote composting site evaluated is located approximately 3.5 miles east of the treatment plant at the existing landfill site. The 50-acre site is bordered by the St. Vrain Creek on the south and east. This site has been chosen for the following reasons: • Proximity to the treatment plant. • • Site is currently owned by the City of Longmont. • The remote site should reduce potential odor concerns. • Compost generated initially can be utilized for site reclamation. 3. SLUDGE OXIDATION IN A VERTICAL TUBE REACTOR. The VerTech system would remain at the existing VVTP location. The environmental assessment describes any affect the system's resultant ash may have on the environment. The reader is referred to Appendix $ for additional information con- cerning Longmont's background environment. • F. ('C.' ?.4, 1-25 CHAPTER 2 FUTURE SITUATION A. POPULATION FORECAST The current population projection developed by the Denver Regional Council of Governments (DRCOG) for the Longmont service area is presented • in Table 2-1. TABLE 2-1 POPULATION PROJECTION FOR LONGMONT'S SERVICE AREA Year Population 1985 52,000 1990 68,400 2000 79,900 2010 85,700 Longmont's population projection was recently updated by DRCOG follow- ing the issuance of the May 1983 Executive Summary Addendum to the February 1975 Sewage Facilities Report. The addendum was prepared to modify the report to comply with a previously revised 1995 projected population of 72,000. To check the variation between the population projection contained in the addendum with that used in this plan, the 1990 and 2000 values listed above were interpolated to estimate a 1995 population of 74,150. This is approximately 3 percent greater than the 1995 population presented in the Executive Summary Addendum. This small increase in projected population • will not have a significant effect on the implementation of this plan. It is anticipated that the solids management alternative developed in this plan will be implemented by the year 1990. Using 1990 as the base year, the projected population increase is approximately 25 percent during the 20-year planning period. � n 2-1 n� .. B. WASTE FLOWS AND LOADS Historical wastewater flows and loads from 1982 through 1986 are tabulated in Appendix C. Projected flows and organic loads are based on the populations listed in Table 2-1 and the historical average per capita flow, BOD, and TSS generation rates presented in Appendix C. Table 2-2 summarizes the waste flow and load projections used in this study- • TABLE 2-2 PROJECTED ANNUAL AVERAGE WASTE FLOWS AND LOADS Year Flow BOD TSS • (mgd) (tons/day) (tons/day) 1990 10.2 7.6 6.0 2000 11.6 8.9 7.0 2010 12.3 9.6 7.6 C. TREATMENT FACILITY STAGING While Table 2-2 projects a flow of 12.2 mgd in 2010, the existing wastewater treatment facility capacity is approximately 11.6 mgd. Thus, there may be a shortfall of plant capacity between the years 2000 and 2010. However, sine any such shortfall would be within 6 percent of the current rated capacity, no major liquid stream plant expansions are proposed during the study period. As shown on Figure 1-1, a number of the unit processes for solids processing do not have adequate capacity for the entire planning period. Therefore, where required for alternative development, appropriate • expansions to existing sludge facilities are included in the evaluation. ne 7 A 2-2 D. QUANTITY OF SLUDGE Future sludge production vas estimated using the projected BOD loadings and the sludge generation rates tabulated from plant operating data for the period 1982 through 1986. During this period, the mean sludge generation rates were determined to be as follow: s • Average Primary Clarifier Efficiency: 60 percent for TSS and 35 percent for BOD. • Average Secondary Sludge Production: 0.72 lb secondary sludge/lb secondary BOD removed. Based on the sludge generation rates listed above and the waste loadings projected in Table 2-2, the annual average raw sludge production has been estimated over the planning period and is summarized in Table 2-3. TABLE 2-3 PROJECTED ANNUAL AVERAGE RAU SLUDGE PRODUCTION Primary Sludge Secondary Sludge Total Sludge Year Production Production Production ^' (dry ton/day) (dry ton/day) (dry ton/day) 1990 3.6 3.2 6.8 2000 4.2 3.8 8.0 2010 4.5 4.0 8.5 In addition to the annual average raw sludge production, the maximum' month raw sludge production has been estimated. This was accomplished by compiling 60 ratios of monthly average to annual average BOD for the years 1982 through 1986 and determining the ratio that 95 percent o£ the months • were below. This analysis showed that maximum month BOO loads are about 1.25 times greater than the annual average. Using this data and the annual average raw sludge generation rates listed above, the maximum month raw sludge production has been projected and is presented in Table 2-4. SCE 3?a 2-3 I TABLE 2-4 PROJECTED MAXIMUM MONTH RAV SLUDGE PRODUCTION Primary Sludge Secondary Sludge Total Sludge Year Production Production Production • (dry ton/day) (dry ton/day) (dry ton/day) 1990 4.5 4.0 8.5 2000 5.2 4.8 10.0 2010 5.6 5.0 10.6 E. QUALITY OF SLUDGE Longmont's sludge quality and Industrial Pretreatment Program have been discussed in Chapter 1. The quality of Longmont's digested sludge has steadily improved from 1984 through 1986, as shown in Table 1-8. As stated in Chapter 1, copper is the only element reported with a concentration exceeding that acceptable for a Grade I classification. The City is currently working with a number of industries to improve pretreatment and anticipates reporting a Grade I quality sludge by the end of 1987. While striving to obtain and maintain a Grade I wastewater sludge, at this time, the City of Longmont does not intend to supply stabilized sludge for public distribution that has also been treated by a process to further reduce pathogens (PFRP). As vill be discussed, the City intends to develop a large enough agricultural and disturbed land reclamation market to distribute its stabilized sludge in liquid, dewatered, or composted form. This will allow for beneficial use o£ the sludge while maintaining flexibility within Longmont's pretreatment and solids management programs. • ”req?,^ 2-4 CHAPTER 3 SLUDGE MANAGEMENT ALTERNATIVES Future sludge management alternatives available to the City of Longmont for the sludge generated at the wastewater treatment plant are discussed in the sections that follow. Longmont is a city with strong ties 111 to agriculture. As such, the alternatives evaluated, vith the exception of two, propose to reuse the sludge for agricultural purposes. The four basic technologies identified for sludge disposal are as follows: • Land application of anaerobically digested sludge at agronomic rates. • Composting of raw sludge using the aerated static pile or aerated windrow methods. • Co-composting of raw sludge vith processed solid vaste. • Sludge oxidation in a vertical tube reactor. Using these four technologies, eight sludge management alternatives have been evaluated. These technologies and subsequent alternatives vere selected following an initial screening process to eliminate those alternatives that shoe no apparent benefit to the City. The main criteria used in the initial screening include cost, potential for beneficial reuse, potential regula- tory impacts, and compatibility with current operational practice. Alternatives eliminated during the initial screening include: Land Application • Dedicated land disposal. . • Land application of devatered sludge. Composting • In-vessel composting systems. • Composting of digested sludge. Volume Reduction • Incineration. • Zimpro wet air oxidation. Landfill • • Landfill of devatered sludge. The purpose of this chapter is to develop the preliminary design criteria for the alternatives. The criteria include the design and operational parameters for each process along vith facility and trans- portation requirements. A. LAND APPLICATION Land application o£ anaerobically digested sludge at agronomic rates is the method of sludge management currently being practiced by Longmont. Presently, raw sludge is gravity thickened prior to anaerobic digestion. The digested sludge is then transported in liquid form for application to agricultural land. The amount of sludge applied to the fields is dependent upon the type of crops to be grown and their nitrogen requirements. The first four alternatives evaluated were variations of the technology for land application at agronomic rates. The items that vill vary among the alternatives are the total solids concentration of the sludge folloving anaerobic digestion and the method of operation. Both City-owned and operated, and privately-ovned and operated alternatives were evaluated. Using these two variations, the first four alternatives are as follovs: • • Alternative A-1. City-operated land application of anaerobi- cally digested sludge with a total solids concentration of 2.4 percent. • Alternative A-2. City-operated land application of anaerobi- cally digested sludge with a total solids concentration of 3.5 percent. c. n•- ., 3-2 i • Alternative A-3. Contract hauling and land application of anaecobicaly digested sludge with a total solids concentration of 2.4 percent. • Alternative A-4. Contract hauling and land application of anaerobica1l5,—aigested sludge with a total solids concentration of 3.5 percent. • The first step in developing the preliminary design criteria for the land application alternatives was to evaluate the sludge application rates and the agricultural land requirements. The Colorado Domestic Sewage Sludge Regulations limit the annual sludge application rate by crop nitrogen requirements and the cadmium application rate. Since the Longmont WWTP has low cadmium concentrations, the annual application rate will be dependent on the crop nitrogen requirements. Both corn and wheat are crops commonly grown in the Longmont area that are suitable for sludge application. Corn grown for silage has the highest nitrogen requirement of these crops; therefore, the highest sludge applica- tion rate would be to land on which silage corn is to be grown. Table 3-1 shows the annual application rate and the area requirements for each of the crops evaluated. Since the quantity of sludge to be applied in each of the land application alternatives is the same, the area required for each of the alternatives is the same. Table 3-1 shows that the agricultural land requirements would range from 1,030 acres to 3,430 acres, depending on the crop to be grown. The land area requirements have been calculated assuming subsurface injection of liquid sludge. Surface spreading, as presently permitted in Boulder County, would reduce these requirements by 10 to 20 percent. The allowable reduction would result from the volatili- zation of ammonia. The land area calculations are attached as Appendix D. • The Colorado Domestic Sewage Sludge Regulations also limit the cumu- lative sludge application at a site based on the cumulative loading of cadmium, copper, lead, nickel, and zinc. A review of the Longmont sludge quality indicates that copper would limit site life. If an application rate of 2.4 dry tons per acre per year is utilized, and an average copper v^'?" 3-3 di • TABLE 3-1 AGRICULTURAL LAND REQUIREMENTS Sludge Area Cro Application Rate Reguired (dry tons/acre/yr) (acres/yr) Corn (silage) 3.0 1,030 Corn (grain) 2.6 1,210 Wheat (irrigated) 2.4 1,290 Wheat (dry land) 0.9 3,430 Barley (irrigated) 2.1 1,470 • concentration of 625 mg/kg is assumed in the sludge, the estimated site life would be 35 years. This estimated site life is also based on a soil pH of 7.8 and a cation exchange capacity (CEC) of 15 meg/100 g. After establishing the application rates and area requirements, the next step was to establish the operational parameters and the facility and transportation requirements. These criteria are shown for the alternatives • in Tables 3-2 through 3-5. For Alternatives A-1 and A-3, raw primary and secondary sludge would be thickened in the existing gravity thickener prior to anaerobic digestion. The digested sludge would be land applied at a total solids concentration of 2.4 percent. In Alternatives A-2 and A-4, the raw sludge would be thickened by centrifugation prior to anaerobic digestion. The digested sludge for these alternatives would have a total solids concentration of 3.5 percent, and would also be land applied. For each of the land application alternatives, the anaerobic digestion system would be upgraded to accommodate the design sludge quantity and to provide approximately 14 days sludge storage. In addition, each alterna- tive would require upgrading of the sludge loading station. Alternatives A-1 and A-2 would require that the City of Longmont purchase tanker trucks and application vehicles. In Alternatives A-3 and A-4, the contractor would be responsible for hauling and applying the sludge. B. COMPOSTING Aerobic composting is a method of sludge stabilization in which sludge organics are decomposed by microbiological organisms in the presence of oxygen. The end product of sludge composting is a stabilized humus-like • material that can be used as a soil amendment. Composting is an aerobic process that is impacted by several operational parameters. These include the oxygen concentration within the compost pile, and the temperature, moisture, and volatile solids content of the compost. Each of these parameters affects the viability of the aerobic organisms responsible for decomposition of the sludge solids. o © 4�. .f . 3-5 TABLE 3-2 • PRELIMINARY DESIGN CRITERIA LAND APPLICATION AT AGRONOMIC RATES ALTERNATIVE A-1 Design Capacity, dry ton/day Annual Average 8.5 Maximum Month 10.6 Additional Digester Capacity Volume, gal 737,000 Storage Capacity, days 14 Operation Requirements Days Per Week 5 Shifts Per Day 1 Production Hours Per Shift 7 Staffing Per Shift 11 Handling Criteria One-vay Distance to Site, miles 20 Average Speed, mph 20 Truck Capacity, gal 7,000 Number of Trucks 6 Land Application Equipment Applicator Capacity, gal 4,000 Number of Applicators 2 • ”CO^?.6 3-6 TABLE 3-3 PRELIMINARY DESIGN CRITERIA LAND APPLICATION AT AGRONOMIC RATES • ALTERNATIVE A-2 Design Capacity, dry ton/day Annual Average 8.5 Maximum Month 10.6 Centrifuge Equipment Capacity Size, each, gpm 200 Number Required 2 Additional Digester Capacity Volume, gal 505,000 Storage Capacity, days 14 Operation Requirements Days Per Week 5 Shifts Per Day 1 Production Hours Per Shift 7 Staffing Per Shift 10 Handling Criteria One-way Distance to Site, miles 20 Average Speed, mph 20 Truck Capacity, gal 7+000 Number of Trucks 4 Land Application Equipment Applicator Capacity, gal 4,000 • Number of Applicators 2 ctiCn.-?n 3-7 • TABLE 3-4 PRELIMINARY DESIGN CRITERIA LAND APPLICATION AT AGRONOMIC RATES ALTERNATIVE A-3 Design Capacity, dry ton/day Annual Average 8.5 Maximum Month 10.6 Additional Digester Capacity Volume, gal 737,000 Storage Capacity, days 14 Operation Requirements Days Per Sleek 5 Shifts Per Day 1 Production Hours Per Shift 7 Staffing Per Shift 2 • te :ziia, 3-8 • TABLE 3-5 PRELIMINARY DESIGN CRITERIA LAND APPLICATION AT AGRONOMIC RATES ALTERNATIVE A-4 Design Capacity, dry ton/day Annual Average 8'5 Maximum Month 10.6 Centrifuge Equipment Capacity Size, each, gpm 200 Number Required 1 Additional Digester Capacity Volume, gal 505,000 Storage Capacity, days 14 Operation Requirements Days Per Week 5 Shifts Per Day 1 Production Hours Per Shift 7 Staffing Per Shift 2 • n�C�7A 3-9 There are a number of engineered systems available for composting municipal sludge. These systems are often divided into tvo categories: open and in-vessel composting systems. Open systems include aerated statie pile and windrow systems. Open systems are usually exposed to the atmosphere, but can be housed to reduce the detrimental effects of precipitation. Open systems usually require • more area than comparably sized in-vessel systems, but have lover capital costs. In-vessel systems compost sludge in self-contained reactors or vessels. There are tvo basic types of reactors: horizontal and vertical flow systems. The main difference in these systems is the method used for moving compost through the vessel. In-vessel systems can be further classified according to the method used for maintaining aerobic conditions within the compost. All in-vessel systems use forced aeration, while some systems also use mechanical mixing in combination vith forced aeration. During the evaluation of composting, both aerated static pile and vindrow composting methods were evaluated. In-vessel systems vere not considered because of the high capital cost of these systems and because sufficient lov cost land should be available for the implementation of an open composting system. Each alternative vas evaluated for composting rav sludge having a total solids concentration of 22 percent. All active composting and curing would be performed under cover. Following is a summary of the composting alternatives evaluated: • Alternative B-1. Aerated static pile composting of rav sludge without amendment, and with non-aerated windrow curing. • Alternative B-2. Aerated static pile composting of rav sludge and amendment,with non-aerated vindrow curing. • Alternative B-3. Aerated vindrov composting of rav sludge with • amendment. To obtain the total solids concentration necessary for composting, raw sludge would be devatered using belt filter presses. The existing belt filter press facility would be upgraded to accommodate one additional 2.2-meter unit. The devatered cake would be loaded into dump trucks and nfc .7~ 3-10 hauled to the compost facility, which would be located offsite. Once the sludge is received at the compost facility, the method of handling the sludge would be dependent on the method of composting selected. In Alternative B-1, the sludge cake would be mixed with recycled compost by a windrow mixing machine. The initial compost mixture would then be placed in piles over a permanent aeration system. The piles would • not be mixed during the 21-day active composting period. During active composting, air would be supplied to the compost pile. Following active composting, the compost would be cured in a non-aerated windrow for approximately 30 days. The curing windrow would be mixed periodically to facilitate drying. Figure 3-1 shows the materials flow for Alternative B-1. The composting process used in Alternative B-2 is the same as that used for Alternative B-1 except that an amendment, such as wood chips, would be mixed with the sludge cake and recycled compost. The wood chips would help to improve porosity of the compost and the structural integrity of the pile, which would allow the formation of a taller static pile. A taller static pile would reduce the area requirements for composting. Figure 3-2 shows the materials flow for Alternative B-2. The wood used would be of sufficient size to allow screening. For the purpose of this evaluation, it is anticipated that 70 percent of the wood chips would be reclaimed. In the windrow composting system, Alternative B-3 a bed of wood chips would be placed over a permanent aeration system. Sludge cake would then be spread over the wood chip. An auger machine would be used initially for mixing the sludge and wood chips. A windrow mixer would be used following the auger to shape the pile and to mix the compost at periodic intervals. Figure 3-3 shows the materials flow for Alternative B-3. • Unlike the aerated static pile method, windrow composting does not usually require a curing step. Active composting would occur during the first 15 days of the 24-day composting period, while compost drying would occur during the last nine days of the period. Air would be drawn through the windrow during active composting (negative aeration), and air would be forced through the windrow during the drying process (positive aeration). 3_11 new:72 4 t r it O R fa 63/4 vsnraimmiailar r r N �@ � r r r �Q 22..i iC S �! r51 z a•r 550 gga z ,,e• rr« r e , • CI �Sg O� C CC r rr 3,.le x J rr- rr- $ � SI a LA n aaa.yr� YrWs r;mr an: 2 Gi GZ� i V �P..INmN w 3 .• NO • mi• • Q ._,. N..Sr SN N- PI •+ tX W O 3 O O LL Z Z p—ia W J1-- 0M r `r° � SC O Z o o F- :--: a W WOW CC X 4W Goie W O Q $$u u O rr rr•-. O CC U i „ nag rrg L3 r E W O v Sr SWv ite ..J G. I-. � rir rim-• o a s *64 1-4 ¢ U 3 Off} �$} O '+ e`72 rru r-ru CC W MiJ. d Mk, I�'/•�• ��..� • yr/ pmr��•— -mm.N•r V/ ¢ Mt 2231 Z Z I-• O f X CC ~ CC fa P. te r �, sp.�� a-o- r — K r ar i I g m armmm a en nut a u w. =. an. NO: 1390'2-120-OOo-0302 0 r c N • CD O 2 r tarnn m N 7. ,g " gym.. 0 r ssmg o v •� o iii iii A J I isS� Sg rr- ►•r- san- wm•- E N % siu ivm ' u 4ou; �N� c IX W O ' 3 O O J 0 LL Z M— e" Z c 0 J t) 2 CO CO ' CC d Z b to tr Z W r • r� s O i's Cso) CCrr.. rr- C CA J F- 3 Mme`"• I". • � rf°- J Owil 1't Q. 3 i �'r• SRa� o $ I•-. r r rz Se se O - W rrY rrca cc W Fig iii y� ({�y g c2t: rzga o 0.4 '..m. O an X ce H IX 0 03 F. r r N ,ti II p.r-C) 1,1-44. 01-41 �~.V.. .c.'" 4 g OE ii§ pig ail O i i m� moo it . • ...me • • aw • r ram-- —,., J m ! O-�m r•C•sN CO= ♦. tee� . =.0NC. NO: 13003-120-000-0003 § ■ . § a - ; ' � � a o _ § §§ ■ ■ ®§ ® - - $ §s �� - . §P E P� t §§B §§_ i � �u Cn Meni ) �� ko - a■l si -- Cirt: Cr © g C4�� in � O 0 ai � W to r I- � � § § U) _§y. : 0 O Er CL r a o - ¢ O CC A $ ��§ o u i- t U Z s■ Sr �_ ��%".� 01 0 J O 3 u. § ■■§ © § § _ � �@ as3- O Z . ) _� �� 1+4 d S§3 ENE �_ o_ • W & ,srAst cc O - cc W 0 CC ■ ■ 2 ■ 1 2 . �� _� _ � § E a t i §§B ! 2 6-- B § _� III $ _ g{OR7f i I ac$ e� $ _�& � 2m. =. ONO. NO, l380'3-I20-000-030! The preliminary design criteria for each of the alternatives are shown in Tables 3-6 through 3-8. The criteria include storage, transportation, equipment, and labor requirements. The area required for all of the compost alternatives will be depen- dent on the site. Preliminary estimates indicate that less than S acres would be required for a compost facility. • One of the ancillary processes required for the composting alterna- tives is odor control. The City indicated that the site of its existing landfill would be the probable location of any compost facility. Since this site is remotely located, it is anticipated that odors released during composting of raw sludge would have minimal impact on the public. There- fore, the air drawn through the compost piles• would .be exhausted to an odor scrubber consisting of only finished compost. Another requirement of composting is the collection and disposal of leachate and condensate. Vith the probable location of the compost facility remote from the treatment plant, it would not be feasible to return the collected leachate/condensate to the plant through a wastewater collection system. Transport of the leachate/condensate to the treatment plant using tank trucks would be feasible, but would be a costly alternative. Therefore, the leachate/condensate will likely be collected and disposed in an onsite evaporation pond. The possibility also exists that this liquid can be land applied during the summer if suitable cropland can be found close to the composting site. Storm water runoff from the composting site would also be collected and transported to the evaporation pond. Precipitation landing on the roof of the structures would be collected through a gutter system and trans- ported through downspouts away from the facility. This will minimize the size of the evaporation pond or irrigation facility. • 3-12 rec.—ryn TABLE 3-6 PRELIMINARY DESIGN CRITERIA AERATED STATIC PILE COMPOSTING OP RAW SLUDGE WITHOUT AMENDMENT ALTERNATIVE B-1 • Design Capacity, dry ton/day Annual Average 8.5 Maximum Month 10.6 Ray Sludge Storage Solids Concentration, percent 5.5 Storage Requirement, days 5 Storage Volume Required, gal 185,000 Deyatered Sludge, percent Minimum Solids Concentration 22 Volatile Solids Concentration 75 Operation Requirements Days Per Week 5 Shifts Per Day 1 Production Hours Per Shift 7 Staffing Per Shift 7 Hauling Criteria One-Way Distance, miles 5 Average Speed, mph 20 Truck Capacity, cu yd 12 Number of Trucks 2 Mixing Equipment Type Windrov mixer Number 1 • Active Composting Area Number of Static Piles 4 Pile Height, ft 5 Pile Residence Time (average), days 21 Building Area Requirement (net), sq ft 78,400 3-13 nT Q„?a. TABLE 3-6 PRELIMINARY DESIGN CRITERIA AERATED STATIC PILE COMPOSTING OF RAW SLUDGE WITHOUT AMENDMENT ALTERNATIVE B-1 (Continued) • Blower Operation Peak Continuous Average Intermittent (timer or temperature control) Blower Requirements 8 at 2,100 scfm/blower Curing/Drying Area Residence Time (average), days 30 Pile Height, ft 15 Building Area Requirement (net), sq ft 13,000 Finished Compost Storage Storage Required (average), days 60 Pile Height, ft 15 Building Area Requirement (net), sq ft T+000 • SC r+ ; 2'5 3-14 TABLE 3-7 PRELIMINARY DESIGN CRITERIA AERATED STATIC PILE COMPOSTING OF RAW SLUDGE WITH AMENDMENT ALTERNATIVE B-2 • Design Capacity, dry ton/day Annual Average 8.5 Maximum Month 10.6 Rav Sludge Storage Solids Concentration, percent 5.5 Storage Requirement, days 5 Storage Volume Required, gal 185,000 Devatered Sludge, percent Minimum Solids Concentration 22 Volatile Solids Concentration 75 Operation Requirements Days Per Week 5 Shifts Per Day 1 Production Hours Per Shift 7 Staffing Per Shift 7 Hauling Criteria One-Way Distance, miles 5 Average Speed, mph 20 Mixing Equipment Type Vindrov mixer Number 1 Active Composting Area Number of Static Piles 4 • Pile Height, ft 12 Pile Residence Time (average), days 21 Building Area Requirement (net), sq ft 32,400 ne eti 3-15 TABLE 3-7 PRELIMINARY DESIGN CRITERIA AERATED STATIC PILE COMPOSTING OF RAW SLUDGE WITH AMENDMENT ALTERNATIVE B-2 (Continued) • Blower Operation Peak Continuous Average Intermittent (timer or temperature control) Blower Requirements 8 at 2,100 scfm/blower Curing/Drying Area Residence Time (average), days 30 Pile Height, £t 15 Building Area Requirement (net), sq ft 13,000 Finished Compost Amendment Storage Storage Required (average), days 60 Pile Height, ft 15 Building Area Requirement (net), sq ft 12,000 • frch`q?n 3-16 TABLE 3-8 PRELIMINARY DESIGN CRITERIA AERATED WINDROW COMPOSTING OF RAW SLUDGE WITH AMENDMENT ALTERNATIVE 8-3 • Design Capacity, dry ton/day Annual Average 8.5 Maximum Month 10.6 Raw Sludge Storage Solids Concentration, percent 5.5 Storage Requirement, days 5 Storage Volume Required, gal 185,000 Dewatered Sludge, percent Minimum Solids Concentration 22 Volatile Solids Concentration 75 Operation Requirements Days Per Week 5 Shifts Per Day 1 Production Hours Per Shift 7 Staffing Per Shift 6 Hauling Criteria One-Way Distance, miles 5 Average Speed, mph 20 Windrow Composting Windrow Residence Time (average), days 24 Number of Windrows 24 Windrow Height, ft 5 Windrow Width, ft • Top 4 Base 16 Windrow Length, ft 76 Building Area Required (net), sq ft 65,300 ' s„.• • 3-17 TABLE 3-8 PRELIMINARY DESIGN CRITERIA AERATED WINDROW COMPOSTING OF RAW SLUDGE WITH AMENDMENT ALTERNATIVE B-3 (Continued) Blower Operation Peak Continuous Average intermittent (timer or temperature control) Blower Requirements 12 @ 1,200 scfm/blover Finished Compost/Amendment Storage Storage Required (average), days 60 Pile Height, ft 15 Building Area Required, sq ft 12,000 • nro;7s 3-18 C. CO-COMPOSTING Co-composting is the aerobic, microbiological stabilization of sewage sludge combined with municipal solid waste. As in sludge composting, co-composting produces a humus-like product that can be used as a soil amendment. Co-composting has been used primarily as a conditioning and disposal • method for solid waste. In this process, raw sludge is added to municipal refuse to increase the moisture and volatile solids content of the refuse. The quantity of material that can be co-composted is dependent on the quantity of refuse to be composted. The systems available for co-composting are the same as those previously described for sludge composting. Solid waste must be processed to remove ferrous and non-ferrous metals, glass, hard plastics, and other nonbiodegradable materials prior to being mixed with sludge. The fraction remaining for co-composting is composed of paper, light plastics, and small portions of glass and metal that were not removed. The solid waste will also require size reduction prior to or after the separation process, depending on the separation methods used. The purpose of reducing the size of the refuse is to improve the rate of biodegradation of the material. If the preprocessing of solid waste is determined to be cost-effective based on the anticipated extension of landfill life, the wastewater utility staff has agreed to consider the use of refuse as an amendment in compost- ing operations. The additional facilities required for the storage and processing of solid waste with sludge would be financed by the City through some mechanism other than the wastewater utility funds. D. SLUDGE OXIDATION IN A VERTICAL TUBE REACTOR • VerTech Treatment Systems has proposed to modify the existing VTR facility to process raw sludge quantities ranging from 3 to 10 dry tons per day. The primary modifications that have been proposed include the following: 3-19 n�• ��; • Remove the existing 10-inch reactor and repair the reactor casing. • Install a new reactor. • Overhaul surface equipment and control systems. • Add a mechanical ash devatering system. • Alternative C-1 is the processing of Longmont's rav sludge in the modified VTR facility. Preliminary design criteria were developed for this alternative and are shovn in Table 3-9. The criteria include the require- ments for sludge storage, sludge processing, ash transportation, and ash landfilling. In this process, rav sludge would be pumped to the VTR facility at a total solids concentration o£ approximately 5.5 percent. Oxygen would be mixed vith the sludge by adding pure oxygen and air to the sludge stream. Effluent from the reactor would be discharged to the existing plate separator where the ash and liquid effluent would be separated prior to further devatering of the ash. The ancillary facilities required for this alternative include rav sludge storage, ash devatering and disposal, liquid effluent treatment, and acid storage and treatment. The rav sludge storage requirement will be dependent on the system dovntime since the VTR facility would operate continuously. Reactor descaling would likely be required every to 10 to 15 days, which would result in the reactor being down for approximately 15 hours every two weeks. In addition, if the reactor must be removed for repairs, the facility could be inoperable for a significantly longer period. For this reason, a minimum o£ five days storage capacity has been provided in the preliminary design criteria. Following devatering, ash generated by the process would be disposed • in a privately-owned landfill. Antlyses of the ash produced during the • demonstration project indicated that it would not be a hazardous material. Mechanical devatering of ash collected during operation of the demonstra- tion facility indicated that total solids concentration ranging from 40 to 75 percent were attainable. 3-20 ”C e.;-3^, TABLE 3-9 PRELIMINARY DESIGN CRITERIA r SLUDGE OXIDATION IN A VERTICAL TUBE REACTOR ALTERNATIVE C-1 Design Capacity, dry ton/day Annual Average 8.5 Maximum Month 10.6 Raw Sludge Storage Solids Concentration, percent 5.5 Storage Requirement, days 5 Storage Volume Required, gal 185,000 Operation Requirements Days Per Week 7 Shifts Per Day 3 Production Hours Per Shift 7 Staffing Per Shift 1 VTR Operations Electrical Power Requirements, kW/year 622,000 Oxygen Requirements, tons/day 6.0 Ash Landfilling Ash Quantity, cu yd/day 3.5 One-vay Distance, miles 20 Truck Capacity, cu yd 30 Number of Trucks 1 • • c '• 3-21 ~? Liquid effluent from the solids separation processes would be returned to the treatment plant headworks. It is estimated that the BOO concentra- tion of the effluent would be approximately 20 percent of the VTR feed concentration. The volume of effluent to be treated would be approximately equal to the volume of the sludge processed in the reactor. By returning the effluent to the plant headvorks, the quantity of sludge produced may be • increased. The additional sludge quantity was estimated at 1.8 dry tons per day for the design year 2010 sludge generation. The acid required for descaling should be stored onsite since descaling would be a regular maintenance procedure. Storage should be provided for a one-month supply of acid. Additional storage may be required for the used acid, which ultimately must be treated and disposed offsite. E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS OF THE PROPOSED ALTERNATIVES 1. LAND APPLICATION. The fundamental objective o£ land application of stabilized wastewater treatment plant sludge solids is to apply the sludge in such a manner that the soils can assimilate the solids and prevent the offsite movement of any deleterious byproducts to adjacent lands, into a flowing stream, or into the underlying groundwater. There- fore, the selection of a suitable site is paramount to a successful program. Site selection must be based on several basic interrelated parameters: landscape features, soil parent material including geologic characteristics, and properties of the soil. Ideally, the appropriate landscape features of the site should include a closed or modified closed drainage system and slopes of less than 4 percent. Soil parent material should include medium-textured material; have a high pH and/or free carbonates (calcareous); and bedrock and unconsolidated substrata should be free of coarse conducting layers or conduits, and should always be at • least 3-4 feet below the soil surface. Soils should have high surface infiltration capacity and moderate subsoil permeability, a. thickness of at least 3 feet without restrictive layers, be yell or moderately well 3-22 Of ©itiZ' 4 drained, have moderate to high available water capacity, have a p8 ranging from 6.5 to 8.2, and have medium to high levels of organic matter 1n the surface horizon. The constituents and characteristics of the sludge to be applied are also to be considered. If the above criteria are met for site selection, then future use of the land must also be appraised. All of the sites in tthis study are presently being used for agricultural purposes. for the program to be successful, the owners or operators of the sites must be assured that uninterrupted use of their land will be maintained. The heavy metal, nutrient, and persistent organic concentrations must correspond to the agronomic application rates if such assurance is to be given. The odor aspect of land application of sludge can be significant. Sludge will cause odor problems where residents are in close proximity to the disposal site. This can be mitigated by subsoil injection of the sludge or incorporation of surface applied sludge. Proper stabilization or digestion of sludge prior to application also greatly lessens the odor impacts. Noise associated with land application of sludge will be generated by the machinery involved. Tractors or truck applicators will be used in the disposal method. The noise generated will be no greater than that generated by ordinary farm equipment. The visual aspects of land application will be short-term and no more objectionable than normal farming practices. Vector production will be minimized by incorporation of subsoil injection of the sludge. Surface applied sludge will quickly dry, flake, and self-incorporate into the upper soil layers. All sludge to be land applied must be treated by a "process to sig- nificantly reduce pathogens". Aerobic and anaerobic digestion, composting, or other types of stabilization will adequately accomplish this reduction. • Public access to land receiving sludge applications must be controlled for at least 12 months, and grazing by animals whose products are consumed by humans must be prevented for at least one month after application. 3-23 eroR, Pathogenic microorganisms such as bacteria, viruses, protozoa, and parasitic vorms are found in rav sewage. Sludge stabilization processes destroy most of the pathogens. Some of the most common bacterial pathogens associated with sewage are Salmonella, Shigella, Vilorio, and Campylobacter. Major pathogenic viruses include Poliovirus, Coxsackieviruses, Echoviruses, and Hepatitis virus. Common parasites include Entamoeba histolytica, Giarda lamblia, and Balantidium cola. Intestinal Ascaris can also be transmitted by close contact with sewage. Fungi spores of Aspergillus fumigatus are frequently found in dust near compost operations where wood chips are used as an amendment. In land application of sludge, pathogens survive for a period of time following application. Temperature is an important factor in this survival. In the case of bacteria, and probably viruses, the die-off rate is approximately doubled vith each 10 degree rise in temperature between 5Cand 30 C. Land application o£ digested sludges has shovn little impact on bacterial contamination of groundwater, provided that the groundwater table is not too high and the soil is well drained. Rainfall, temperature, evaporation, and wind are important environ- mental factors for the land application of sludge. The Longmont area is warm and arid and is very suitable for this sludge disposal practice. 2. AERATED STATIC PILE OR AERATED WINDROW COMPOSTING OF RAW SLUDGE. Composting is a process of sludge stabilization by aerobic microbial decomposition. This alternative would involve the transport of devatered rav sludge from the wastewater treatment plant to the City of Longmont landfill site for composting. A new composting facility requires approximately one acre of relatively flat land for each 4 dry tons of sludge processed, to provide the area sufficient for pathogen reduction • requirements. Additional land would be required for curing, storage, and screening. Composting is a desirable alternative for sludge disposal because it is generally more publicly acceptable than other methods. It will generate a product with reduced odor potential that is easily stored and has greatly decreased levels of persistent organics and pathogens. Because all of the compost activity occurs above ground and most operations take place on asphalted pads, soils and geology of the site do not normally restrict its use. They are, however, important environmental aspects in that the site must be well drained and adequately bermed to reduce the effect on surrounding properties or vatercourses by vet weather runoff. • Raw sludge can be malodorous. Its transport and use in a composting operation may cause temporary odor problems. In the standard procedure for composting, raw sludge is mixed with recycled compost or other amendment soon after delivery, thus reducing the odor potential. Use of negative aeration, drawing air through the pile, and exhausting the air through a finished compost pile also helps to control odors. Noise will be a potential factor in any composting operation. Pile mixing equipment and blower operation will periodically cause greater than normal noise. Vector production via composting at the City landfill site will not significantly impact the area. The fungus Aspergillus fumigatus has been shown to be associated with compost operations vhen vood chips are used as an amendment. Studies have shown, hovever, that the higher spore concen- trations are restricted to the immediate composting area and should not pose any public health threat to the surrounding area. Dust production during delivery, mixing, and handling of compost could be a problem to surrounding residents and workers at the site. This will be temporary, and long-term reduction can be accomplished by. paving the access road and instituting a housekeeping program, including the use o£ water or other chemicals to reduce dust generation. Workers at the compost site should avoid inhaling dust by vearing protective masks vhen mixing the piles or moving the finished compost. Leachate and runoff from the composting site must be controlled to • prevent environmental impacts. Since the active composting, curing, and storage areas would be covered, most of the runoff from the site would be uncontaminated roof drainage, and this water can be conveyed directly to surface streams. Smaller amounts of leachate, blower condensate, and surface runoff will also be generated, and these discharges have typically 3-25 rer :,?,/+, higher BOD, heavy metal, and suspended solids concentrations. Precautions must be taken to prevent the discharge of such flows to adjacent watercourses. 3. CO-COMPOSTING OP RAW SLUDGE WITH PROCESSED SOLID WASTE. The use of processed municipal solid waste as an amendment and organic substrate for compost operations has been practiced. in a number of locations. • Biological oxidation is the most important aspect of the composting process and the reduction of solid waste volume is the benefit of co-composting in that landfill life can be extended. Rav sludge will be transported to the Longmont landfill site and mixed vith processed municipal solid waste. Odor generated from this truck transport will be temporary. Also, air discharged by blowers in the compost area vill be vented through finished compost to reduce the odor impacts. 4. SLUDGE OXIDATION IN A VERTICAL TUBE REACTOR. This process involves the deep well oxidation of sludge under pressure and at high temperature. Sludge at 5.5 percent solids is pumped through a long vertical pipe extending a mile below ground, generating an ached material in an aqueous matrix. This material is then dewatered to produce a highly stabilized ash residual. There are virtually no adverse environmental aspects associated vith this method other than temporary odor production at the treatment plant site. • f) rem 3-26 CHAPTER 4 ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS A. INTRODUCTION In this chapter, a comparative analysis of the alternatives described in Chapter 3 will be presented. The analysis included a comparison of both • monetary and non-monetary considerations. The non-monetary considerations include factors such as energy dependency, reliability, flexibility, expandability, operational complexity, potential regulatory impact, and potential liability to the City. The first portion of the chapter will compare the present worth of the alternatives. The second portion will compare the non-monetary aspects of the alternatives. B. COST OF ALTERNATIVES To compare the total present worth of the alternatives, estimated capital costs were determined along with the anticipated operation and maintenance costs for the year 2000. The year 2000 average annual sludge production, 8.0 dry tons per day, vas chosen to estimate annual average operation and maintenance costs during the planning period. Using a 20-year cost evaluation period and the current EPA discount rate of 8-7/8 percent, the annual average operation and maintenance costs were then converted to a present worth value. The anticipated costs for the alternatives are presented in Tables E-1 through E-16 in Appendix E. Equipment replacement costs have been included in the operation and maintenance tables. For this analysis, it has been assumed that any heavy equipment, sludge transport, and sludge application vehicles would be replaced after 10 years of service and would have no salvage value. C. PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS • Table 4-1 summarizes the total present worth of the eight alternatives. The present worth vas calculated by adding the capital cost, present worth of the operation, maintenance and equipment replacement costs, and subtracting the present worth of the estimated remaining, or salvage value. nf'C.:.,?.At 4-1 ■ - ■ ! K 7 i73 ` � f%��3� ` f !_ , ,` 0; � � " _40 � 0a nel 0 ! !§ } et 0 7 f .. �� • -8 �;\ | �! � ; I ■ • •■. Ill•\{,oh . $ - f ; � �p� �tf�| \ ' GP. ~ I en j] !§ ,§I f - K 7 ! § } • o�Ina•\ 2\ 2 . • .PP W . . !a§k . _| r 66 /� 2 7 7 ! ( 75 CI klk . § , §�]-1 ae p P.M. r.. 72]! | | . - | § •, §f f § F ; ■ K § • )��k gA1-a • \ § �§� § •am i • , !a 7 $ ! §• . . )k�i§ 1.1 » \ : on i et re \�!\\ | .. - /7 ]a li 7 .. i \ ! ° �l3,.z :�§ a IS 7.. i sf • ■•` • ! ! .l;i | ! k - • .;|f� ; $. ! / ! �k -�f • ! _ ; •• ; ; / • § ;l� k� ; l . 20� � al, - - � k • ,f ■ , ! 7 �_ | a \k2|! •▪ � . |a § = | � d02a \ 5k :! la29l22! B ®2 RCCG3m, The remaining value of the alternatives has been estimated to be 25 percent of the cost of the permanent structures that are constructed. The permanent structures include such items as the proposed dewatering building and composting structures. The equipment within the buildings and pavement around the structures have not been included. The present worth costs were calculated using a 20-year planning • period and a discount rate of 8-7/8 percent. Current labor and utility costs were increased 15 percent to represent the costs for labor, fuel, and electricity in 1990, the anticipated year of project startup. In addition to the total present worth, Table 4-1 presents the unit cost of each alternative and its relative cost when compared to the lowest cost alternative. The present worth of the alternatives ranges from $6,753,000 for City-operated land application of digested sludge at 2.4 percent total solids to $8,334,000 for sludge oxidation in a vertical tube reactor. The difference in present worth costs between the most cost-effective and least cost-effective alternatives is approximately 23 percent. The differences in total present worth will be discussed for each of the four sludge management technologies. 1. LAND APPLICATION OF DIGESTED SLUDGE AT AGRONOMIC RATES. Four land application alternatives were evaluated to address questions of (1) whether a City-controlled land application program would be more cost- effective than contract hauling for an operation the size of the City of Longmont, and (2) whether additional thickening prior to digestion to increase the digested sludge solids concentration would be a cost-effective measure. Based on price quotes received from contract hauling firms, it appears cost-effective for Longmont to implement their own land application program. Contract hauling firms were asked to estimate their charge to the • City, on a cost per gallon basis, for a "turnkey" land application program. The turnkey operation assumes no City involvement outside the limits of the treatment facility. (turn 4-3 Using the average costs received, $0.0289 per gallon for 2.4 percent total solids, and $0.0321 per gallon for 3.5 percent total solids, it does not appear cost-effective for Longmont to enter into a contract hauling agreement for the land application of sludge. The reduced land application operation and maintenance costs asso- ciated with an increase of digested sludge total solids concentration • do not offset the increased capital cost of the additional thickening equipment. By increasing the total solids concentration of the digested sludge and reducing the volume, the land application costs could be reduced. However, the additional capital and operation and maintenance costs associated with the required thickening more than offset the . potential savings and, in the case of the City-operated system, increase the disposal cost by approximately 9 percent. 2. COMPOSTING OF RAV SLUDGE. Three composting alternatives have been evaluated: aerated static pile composting without amendment, aerated static pile composting with amendment, and aerated windrow composting with amendment. A review of Table 4-1 shows that the difference in present worth between these alternatives is approximately 2 percent, well within the accuracy limits of the analysis. Based on this information, it is concluded that each of composting alternatives can be operated for essentially the same cost. 3. SLUDGE OXIDATION IN A VERTICAL TUBE REACTOR. VerTech Treatment Systems provided information regarding the use of this wet oxidation system as a sludge treatment process. Following oxidation, the ash would be dewatered and landfilled. Using the information provided by VerTech and criteria used in the development of other alternatives, a present worth of S8,334,000 was estimated. As stated previously, this is the highest present worth of all the alternatives, approximately 23 percent greater than the most cost-effective alternative. • 4-4 • D. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS A number of criteria other than cost were analyzed in the development of the Solids Mancgement Plan. A plan must be more than just cost- effective to provide the City of Longmont with a satisfactory long-term solution for its solids management. The alternatives vere compared against the following criteria to determine the best solution for the City of O Longmont: • Energy consumption. • Reliability. • Flexibility. • Expandability. • Operational complexity- • Land area requirements. • Potential regulatory impact- • Potential liability to Longmont. • Odor potential. • Environmental impacts. A discussion of each of the criteria is provided in the following paragraphs. 1. ENERGY CONSUMPTION. The alternative with the lowest total annual energy consumption is land application of liquid sludge at 3.5 percent total solids. Land application of liquid sludge at 2.4 percent total solids vas the second most energy-efficient alternative. Pollowing land application, the composting alternatives were the least dependent upon energy- Sludge oxidation in a vertical tube reactor vas the most energy-dependent, with estimated annual energy costs approximately 180 percent higher than land application at 3.5 percent solids. • 2. RELIABILITY- The composting alternatives are considered to be the most reliable of the alternatives analyzed. Composting, as evaluated in this plan, would not be veather-dependent. The composting operations would take place under cover, which would provide protection from precipitation. The composting alternatives, while using heavy equipment, 4-5 are not considered to be highly mechanized. In addition, the composting alternatives are less likely than the land application alternatives to be impacted by future development adjacent to Longmont. The City-operated land application alternative is the next most reliable alternative, although it is dependent upon weather and farming schedules. The City-operated program has been ranked at a higher level of • reliability than contract hauling since the City-operated alternative is not dependent on a contract with an outside organization. Theoretically, the sludge oxidation alternative should be a reliable sludge processing alternative. Hovever, due to the lack of data demon- strating continuous operation, the VerTech System was given the same 'ranking as contracted land application. 3. FLEXIBILITY. Each of the alternatives evaluated for use at Longmont would provide a flexible method for disposal or reuse of sludge. However, composting was considered to provide the highest level of flexi- bility of all the alternatives. Variations in sludge production could be accommodated in' the composting facility by modifying detention times and recycle volumes. The land application alternatives are also flexible and could be modified to incorporate changes in sludge quantity or nutrient concentrations. The VerTech sludge oxidation facility would also offer flexibility to the City at loading rates below the system capacity of 10 dry tons per day. The VerTech System is the best alternative evaluated for treating sludge of a poor quality. It is not anticipated, however, that Longmont's sludge will be contaminated and not suited to beneficial reuse. As discussed in Chapter 1, the City's pretreatment program has facilitated an increase in the quality of the sludge such that it is nearly a Grade I classification. 4. EXPANDABILITY. Composting of raw sludge and land application of • digested sludge vould be readily expandable. The land application alter- natives would be the easiest to expand up to the point of requiring an additional digester. Construction of a third digester on the current plant site would be difficult. 4-6 ^f't0fi9. • Expansion of the composting facilities would have minimal impact at the treatment facility, but would involve the construction of additional composting area at the offsite location. The existing 1.2-meter belt filter press may have to be replaced with a larger unit, depending upon the amount of expansion. If a second 2.2 meter vere installed, the City's dewatering capability would be expanded to approximately 15 dry tons per • day, which is nearly double the projected annual average sludge production. Expansion of the VerTech Treatment System beyond 10 dry tons per day would involve the construction of a second vertical tube reactor. For this reason, this technology has been given the lowest ranking for expandability. 5. OPERATIONAL COMPLEXITY. The VerTech sludge oxidation alternative would be the most complex to operate. The soil sampling, groundwater monitoring requirements, and coordination with farmers make the land application the next most complex alternative. Composting is the least complex of the alternatives evaluated. • 6. LAND AREA REOUIREMENTS. The VerTech sludge oxidation system would require the smallest total area at approximately one acre. Composting is the next most space-efficient alternative, requiring approximately 5 acres. Land application of sludge at agronomic rates requires the largest total land area. As discussed in Chapter 3, the land area requirements range from 1,000 to over 3,000 acres, depending upon the crop grown. The cooperation of farmers and ranchers around the City of Longmont has been good historically. However, population growth, changes in regulations, and increased development may decrease the area available for application. 7. POTENTIAL REGULATORY IMPACT. The alternative most susceptible to regulatory changes is land application. The State o£ Colorado is currently modifying the regulations regarding land application. The cost of a land • application program could increase substantially if the modifications require an increase in haul distance or eliminate one or more of the crops that can be grown on a land application site. 4-7 c* ^ The ash generated by the VerTech Treatment System has successfully passed the current EP toxicity test. Although the ash has not been subjected to the TCLP test, it is anticipated that ash could be landfilled for the duration of the study period. The compost generated would most likely be classified Grade II and would have undergone a process to further reduce pathogens (PFRP). The • City currently anticipates generating an adequate market within the agricultural community to recycle all of the product. It is anticipated that minor changes to the regulations will have limited impact on the process. 8. POTENTIAL LIABILITY TO LONGMONT. The City of Longmont is responsible for the safe processing and disposal or reuse of their sludge. For this reason, the City maintains some liability no matter which alternative is implemented. As discussed previously, the ash resulting from the oxidation of sludge has passed the EP toxicity test and should not pose a threat to a landfilling operation. The entire VerTech System, however, has not been continuously demonstrated in full-scale operation at any location. If the City purchases the system and cannot successfully operate it in the manner projected by VerTech, the cost of processing sludge could become extremely high. Land application at agronomic rates involves a minimal liability associated with potential adverse environmental impacts. The main risk to Longmont with this alternative is related to the required number of vehicles on the road. As with digested sludge land application, the spreading of finished compost on agricultural and disturbed land poses a minimal negative environmental impact. The transport of a dewatered sludge and finished compost will require fewer vehicles, thereby reducing the likelihood of • vehicle mishaps. 9. ODOR POTENTIAL. Composting of raw sludge has the highest odor potential of all the alternatives evaluated. Sludge solids will emit odors in a composting configuration until the compost becomes fully aerobic. With proper operation, however, the odors will be minimal except during 4-8 periods of pile construction and startup. The siting of the composting facility is critical in minimizing odor impacts. Land application of digested sludge can be performed with limited release of odors, and the VerTech System also generates little odor when operated properly. 10. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS. In evaluating the environmental impacts of the four alternatives, the following parameters were considered: • • Recycling of sludge nutrients. • Dust generation. • Exhaust emissions. • Noise production. • Odor potential. • Road traffic. • Spill potential. • Groundwater impacts. • Surface water impacts. • Soil impacts. • Community resources. • VVTP operation enhancement. • Reliability. Land application involves the handling of digested sludge at solids concentrations of 2.4 percent or 3.5 percent. These solids will be trucked by tanker or "nurse" vehicle to sites where the sludge will be transferred to a surface spreader or to a subsurface injector vehicle for ultimate land application. The second alternative involves the dewatering of raw sludge at the VVTP to 20-25 percent solids. This material will be trucked to the Longmont landfill site where it will be composted. The types of composting • methods evaluated include aerated static pile and aerated windrow systems. The compost operation will take place on an asphalted pad covered by a metal building with three sides enclosed. The pad will be bermed to facilitate the capture of any runoff from the composting and storage areas. All roof leaders will drain off the pad area. The finished compost will be either distributed at the site, trucked to reuse sites for application, or landfilled. CTOCCV\ 4-9 The third alternative involves the trucking of devatered ray sludge to the Longmont landfill site where it vill be mixed with processed municipal solid waste and co-composted. The ultiamte disposal of the compost product will likely be achieved through landfilling. The fourth alternative is the sludge oxidation method. This involves the transfer of thickened rav sludge to the VTR facility adjacent to the • VVTP. The sludge will be pumped under pressure into the tubular reactor where an autogenic oxidation reaction takes place to convert the organic material in the sludge into water, carbon dioxide, and inorganic ash. This material will be pumped to the surface and dewatered to approximately 70 percent solids. The ash will be trucked to a landfill for ultimate disposal. Any free liquid from the devatering process vill be returned to the VVTP for processing. In the following ranking analysis of these alternatives, the alterna- tive having the most beneficial/least adverse environmental impacts has been given a low ranking number. Conversely, the alternative vith the least beneficial/most adverse environmental impacts has been given a high • ranking number. All rankings have been done relative to each other for each specific parameter (see Table 4-2). The rating analysis employs a system in which each parameter is weighted in importance relative to all others. Each alternative rating is computed using the rankings in relationship to these weights. The alter- native with the highest rating is considered the most beneficial as it relates to environmental impacts. The next highest would be the next most beneficial, etc. (see Table 4-3). The first item of consideration in the ranking is the recycling of the sludge nutrients. Land application vill introduce the greatest amount of nutrients to the soil, giving this alternative the best ranking. Only a • portion of the sludge nutrient resources will be retained for recycle vith the composting and co-composting alternatives. The oxidation process will develop a product which will only be landfilled, thus recycling none of the nutrient resources. nr eqz A 4-10 TABLE 4-2 PARKING Op RELATIVE tiNIRONKOTAL ERECTS . Land Sludge parameter Applldcion Cemposcing Co-Composting Oxidation Recycle Sludge Nutrients 1 3 3 4 Dust Generation - Treatment 1 2 3 1 Dust Generation - DSaposal 4 1 2 1 Exhaust - Treatment 1 2 2 4 Eshaust — Disposal 4 2 2 2 Raise - Treatment 2 3 2 2 Noise - Disposal 4 2 2 1 Oder - Treatment 2 3 4 3 Odor - Disposal 3 2 3 1 Spill potential - Treatment 3 3 3 1 Spill potential - Disposal 4 2 2 1 Road Titanic 4 3 3 2 Groo ndmster Impacts 3 2 3 1 Surface altar Impacts 3 3 3 2 Soil Impacts 3 2 4 1 Aesthetics 4 2 3 1 Recycle Resources 3 3 5 3 advance UUCP 4 3 3 3 Reliability 4 2 2 4 1 Most beneficial, least adverse 5 e Least beneficial, most adverse • F.,`0 q'Tr!g, 4-11 TABLE 4-3 RATING Of R47JSIVE EMSE maNS'AL eine 1 • Land Sludge Parametar weight Application Cospeating co-coepoeting Oxidation Recycle Sludge Nutrients 10 3.6 2.3 2.3 1.1 Dust Generation - Treatment 5 1.3 1.2 0.9 1.5 Dust Generation - Disposal 3 0.7 1.1 1.4 1.6 rxbaust - Treatment S 1.7 1.3 1.3 0.7 Exhaust - Disposal 10 1.4 2.9 2.9 2.9 • Melee -Treateant 5 1.3 1.0 1.3 1.3 Mime - Disposal S 0.7 1.3 1.3 1.7 Oder - Treatment 10 3.3 2.5 1.7 2.5 Odor - Disposal 10 2.0 2.7 2.0 3.3 Spill Potential - Treatment S 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.6 Spill Potential - Disposal 15 2.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 Road Traffic 10 1.7 2.5 2.5 3.3 . Ground ester Impacts 15 3.0 4.0 3.0 5.0 Surface Mater Impede 15 3.1 3.5 3.5 4.6 Soil Impacts 15 3.2 4.3 2.1 5.4 Aesthetics 20 2.9 5.7 4.3 7.1 Recycle Rsenerces 10 3.0 3.0 1.0 3.0 EMena WWTP 10 1.6 2.7 2.7 2.7 Reliability 155 2.5 5.0 5.0 2.5 Totals 195 41.0 52.0 44.3 57.6 NOTE: The Environmental Effects Ratino has been prepared to illustrate the relative environmental impacts of the alternatives evaluated. In Table 4-3, the higher rating indicates • lower detrimental impact to the environment. • n •L'ecet.214t 4-12 The ranking of alternatives with respect to dust generation is based on a consideration of treatment site methodology, vehicle miles, and the type of roads used for sludge transport. Dust will be generated by turning, handling, and loading in the composting operation. This ranking considered dust generated at the treatment sites and in the transportation corridor to and including the disposal sites. At the treatment site, the • land application and sludge oxidation alternatives would generate the least amount of dust because the sludge would be in liquid form. The composting and co-composting alternatives are ranked higher because they would generate dust during the compost operation, with negligible amounts being generated during transport from the WTP to the landfill. The rankings for dust generated at the disposal site show the land application alternative to be high because of the gravel roads on which the tanker trucks must drive to reach the application sites. Since the solids quantities are reduced in the composting alternative, the composting and co-composting alternatives were given lover rankings. Sludge oxidation was ranked the lovest due to the relatively innocuous method of landfilling the smaller amount of devatered ash as the ultimate disposal practice. The land application alternative will generate the least amount of exhaust emission at the IMF with sludge oxidation generating the most, especially during times of loss of autogenicity in the vertical tube reactor. The only exhaust generated by the composting and co-composting alternatives would be during transport to the landfill site. At the disposal sites, land application ranks higher than the rest due to the road miles driven in reaching the sites. Composting is next in rank because at the compost site gas- or diesel-driven machinery will be used to mix, turn, move, and load the compost during the process. Also, some road miles vill be driven delivering the compost to the ultimate disposal sites. Sludge oxidation and composting were given the same ranking because there will be • some road miles driven delivering the final material from the reactor to the landfill. Co-composting is also equal in rank because the onsite handling of the compost is the only exhaust generating activity associated with this disposal method. 4-13 fCczr In assessing the noise impacts at the treatment site, composting ranks higher than the rest due to the somevhat higher noise level associated with the use of mixing and turning equipment. • Offsite noise generated by land application vehicles delivering and applying the sludge to the land application sites cause this ranking to be the highest. Composting and co-composting rank next because there will be • some offsite road noise not associated with the sludge oxidation method. Since the sludge applied in the land application alternative is digested, it will not impart as objectionable an odor at the VVTP as the other alternatives. The raw sludge ingredient and the use o£ processed municipal solid vast< in co-composting give this alternative the highest odor potential ranking. Composting and sludge oxidation are equal and ' relatively high also due to the use and handling of raw sludge. The odor released at the disposal sites in the land application alternative could be noticed temporarily during applcation. The ranking of co-composting is equal to that of land application because the odor of compost with municipal solid waste may be objectionable to some people. Composting ' ranks next lowest because of the stability of the process and the rev products used. The sludge oxidation alternative destroys most odor causing organics in the sludge and, therefore, should be the least odorous. The ranking of alternatives with respect to road traffic was based on the relative number of road miles anticipated for trucks or tankers trans- porting the variety of materials. Land application ranks high because the land application sites are spread throughout the area. Composting and co-composting also rank high because the material will have to be moved twice, once from the 4NTP to the landfill and again to the ultimate disposal sites. Sludge oxidation ranks the lowest because it has the smallest volume of materials to be moved and the lowest number of miles • to be driven. The potential for spills at the treatment site is highest with the • land application alternative due to the low percent solids to be handled. Composting and co-composting are equal in rank because the percent solids of the material at the VWTP will also be low, but must be dewatered to a 4-14 concentration of 20-25 percent, adding to the potential for spill. Sludge oxidation ranks the lovest because the spill potential is minimized by moving the sludge to the reactor through pipelines. At the disposal sites, land application ranks highest because the potential for spills to occur enroute to the land application site is high due to the number of sites involved and the miles traveled. Compost- ., ing and co-composting rank next because spills could occur enroute to the landfill, and compost spills could occur enroute to the ultimate disposal Sit!. Sludge oxidation ranks lovest because potential for spills to occur near the reactor site and enroute to the landfill will be minimal. The ranking of groundwater impacts takes into account the potential for subsurface water contamination by leachate from land application and landfill sites. The sludge will contain heavy metals which will be con- centrated in the sludge/compost residues prior to ultimate disposal. Land application ranks highest due to the increased possibility of groundvater contamination by application of liquid sludge. Hydraulic connections between the plow plate and groundvater table could increase this potential. The compost alternatives rank moderately high to medium because of the possibility of ultimate use as a soil amendment adding to the contamination potential for groundwater. Co-composting vould be a bit higher in rank due to the use of solid waste as the amendment. Sludge oxidation ranks lowest because the possibilty of groundvater contamination is minimal during treatment and in ultimate landfill disposal. The alternatives vere ranked on surface water impacts based on proximity to surface watercourses and runoff potential. Land application ranks medium because o£ the possibility of surface vater contamination due to runoff to drainage ditches in close proximity to many of the proposed land application sites. Sites vere chosen to minimize this potential; • however, severe weather could produce a problem. Composting and co-composting are considered equal due to the same considerations presented above. Sludge oxidation is the lowest because of the proposed ultimate disposal method of landfilling the dewatered ash. 4-15 9(.0'-‘to . Co-composting ranks highest in the area of soil impacts due to the potential of heavy metal contamination at the ultimate disposal site. Land application ranks next because the practice of land application of sludge tends to seal the soil surface regardless of the soil texture. Composting has a better ranking because it will increase porosity and add nutrients as a soil additive. Sludge oxidation ranks best because the impacts to soils • will be minimal. Land application was given a higher rank on overall aesthetics due to the presence of trucks and applications over a greater period of time than the compost or sludge oxidation operations. A vell-run sludge management program is one that the public does not notice is actually in operation. In determining the impacts of the recycling of resources, an analysis vas made of the overall use and generation of resources by the alternatives. Co-composting ranked the highest because there is virtually no return of resources as the end product will be landfilled. Sludge oxidation could use less energy and potentially generate steam for use. Composting and land application can return some of the sludge resources to the earth, while expending a moderate amount of resources. The VWTP impact involves the potential benefit to overall facility operation. Land application ranks highest because sludge will have to be digested, adding a treatment operation to the process not found in composting, co-composting, or sludge oxidation. The alternatives were ranked as to their relative reliability. Land application ranks high because the operation is weather-dependent. The land application program is subject to facility upsets that affect the quality of the sludge and its acceptability for application. Sludge oxidation also ranks high due to some operational problems during the demonstration phase and uncertainties inherent in nev technologies. Composting is a proven method of sludge treatment. Putting the operation • under roof greatly enhances the reliability of this alternative. 4-16 AFC j?^, E. ALTERNATIVE RANKING The matrix presented as Table 4-4 ranks each of the alternatives based on the criteria presented in Sections C and D of this chapter. The ranking has been developed so that the lovest number indicates the highest ranking. As an example, sludge oxidation in a vertical tube reactor had the lowest total land area requirement and has been ranked 1 for this • criterion on Table 4-4. Composting of raw sludge has the greatest odor potential of all the alternatives and has been ranked 4 for this criterion. In instances where the alternatives vere similar for a certain criterion, the same ranking was given to each. For certain criteria, there was no superior alternative, so a 1 ranking was not used. Conversely, the fourth ranking was only used for alternative technologies that were clearly the worst in a certain category. A review of the rankings indicates that composting o£ raw sludge is the most advantageous long-term solids management plan for the City of Longmont. The present worth value of composting, however, is approximately 5 percent higher than the most cost-effective alternative. However, at the level of detail presented in this plan, it is difficult to estimate the capital and operation and maintenance costs to within 5 percent. A number of factors such as population changes, or the introduction of a new industry to Longmont could affect these costs. The main objective o£ the present worth analysis is to see how the alternatives compare to each other given the same circumstances. Considering all factors, composting of sludge is the most economical and advantageous, long-term technology available to Longmont, and is recommended for implementation. • 4-17 TABLE 4-4 O2.1Z GP1ZK MANIC= Technology city-operated city-concrected eluded. oxidation Land Land Composting in a vertical criteria _N22 acion Appllu .on of ear sludge Tune Reaeter 4reeent worth valve 1 1 2 a Reliability 2 1 1 I Flexibility 2 2 1 1 smpendability 2 2 1 4 operational Complexity 2 2 1 4 Land Area nequireeente 4 4 2 1 Requlatory Impact. 4 4 2 2 Liability J 4 2 I odor Potential 2 2 4 1 Livironmncal Impede ? ] 2 l TOTAL 24 20 le 26 • 4-18 ; A CHAPTER 5 RECOMMENDED SLUDGE MANAGEMENT PLAN A. INTRODUCTION The evaluation of all considerations indicates that the City should use composting for long-term sludge management even though the estimate of • costs shows composting to be slightly more expensive than land application. Composting was determined to be the most desirable alternative due to its reliability, flexibility, expandability, low operational complexity, small area requirements, and its environmental acceptability. For further information regarding the evaluation of these considerations, refer to Chapter 4. • During the evaluation of alternatives, three methods of composting were evaluated. These methods included the following: • Aerated static pile composting without amendment, followed by non-aerated windrow curing. • Aerated static pile composting with amendment, followed by non-aerated windrow curing. • Aerated windrow composting with amendment. Since the costs for each of these composting alternatives are not signifi- cantly different, the City has indicated a desire to use the alternative that would expand their current aerated static pile composting operation, which does not use amendment. The recommended composting plan would compost dewatered, raw sludge that has a total solids concentration of 22 percent. The compost would be aerated during the active composting period. Following an active compost- ing period of 21 days, the compost would be cured in a non-aerated windrow for an additional 30 days. A windrow mixing machine would be used to mix the compost periodically, which would facilitate drying of the compost. Both composting and curing processes would be covered to minimize the detrimental effects of precipitation. Figure 5-1 shows the material flow diagram for the desired composting operation. C?Q CZ2 5-1 § S / in c0 tO CO . =.. t- ■ F § � . _ §§ k e_ sic A - 2 . a� aF. • M i a §§u S 2 INS U) o ,-_§ 3-_§ § ilm ��. $ §■ a La �f -©M 3 _� _� CC ) �$ ;: CC I.L o O 0 k g Z . P-4w D a ■ k aC et X a-a. � o W0 55u u � a a-pag � g u _ � § __1 0 a % � Sir CO CO EL �_ I ■p § © § § 3 0 cc a � s - ss • 0 _ ti __4J CC 0 k k I . { �� ' Q � 8� RCS • 0 I- 0 - x — CC 8-6 ■ ■ UJ � � �§ � 7 ■ � ,-.-a z _ §§B §§B o § § _CDC one @(O��A i � �■� esa IJ is. . Ca. 01$2. s. l39Cr3-I20-000-0002 Of the three composting alternatives evaluated, aerated static pile composting without amendment would require the largest area of the three composting alternatives due to the limitation on pile height. Vithout amendment in the compost, the static pile could not be constructed higher than 5 feet due to the low porosity of the initial mixture. Amendment could be incorporated readily vithin the recommended plan if the City vere • to decide to add amendment after further evaluation of the pilot composting program. B. FACILITY STAGING Once the recommended sludge management plan vas developed, the need for staged implementation of the plan vas investigated. Staged implemen- tation must be performed to qualify for federal funds if the expected population increase over the design period is equal to or greater than 30 percent. A reviev of population estimates, as reported by DRCOG, indicates that the expected population increase is less than 30 percent. Therefore, the City is not required to stage construction of the compost facility to obtain federal support. Although staging of construction is not required, the City could stage its purchase of front-end loaders. Two front-end loaders were included to provide firm capacity in the design year; hovever, during the first several years of operation, one front-end loader vould not be fully utilized. Therefore, the City could delay the purchase of an additional front-end loader •until the time when the first one is fully utilized. Since composting probably could not be implemented until the year 1990, the City will require an interim sludge management program. It is recommended that the City continue the existing contract land application program while investigating the feasibility of oxidizing sludge using • the modified VTR facility. If VerTech is willing to enter into a short- term contract and sludge oxidation is shown to be more cost-effective than contract land application, then the City could use sludge oxidation as an interim sludge disposal measure. ^f GCCZ 5-2 In addition, until full-scale composting can be implemented, the City should continue to operate its pilot-scale composting program. The pilot-scale program can be used to verify further the operational requirements for the full-scale composting program. C. OPERATIONAL MODIFICATIONS • Implementation of the recommended composting program would result in several modifications to the existing sludge management program. These modifications would include expansion of the devatering system, discon- tinuation of digestion, and the cessation of contract land application activities. The existing devatering system would be upgraded and expanded to include an additional 2.2 meter belt filter press. A new devatering facility would be constructed to house the existing belt filter press and the new press. A truck loading station vould be incorporated with the devatering facility. Since raw sludge would be composted in the proposed plan, the existing anaerobic digesters would be shut dovn. flovever, the digesters would be maintained in operating condition to serve as a backup method for sludge stabilization. The digesters could also be used for sludge storage, if required. The existing contract hauling and land application program would be eliminated once composting is implemented. This should not present any problems to the City since there is no long-term contract vith the current hauling firm. D. UTILITY MANAGEMENT The existing sludge handling program is administered by City personnel responsible for vastevater treatment. The City should establish a sludge • management group vhose sole responsibility would be operation of the sludge management facilities in order to successfully implement the proposed composting program. A separate sludge management group would focus attention on the production of a quality compost that should be readily marketable. f)`0^?!:, 5-3 E. - LOCAL FUNDING The federal government has established support programs designed to aid municipalities in the construction of water and wastewater treatment facilities. Generally, the federal government will provide funds for 55 percent of the capital cost of the project for satisfying current demands. However, since the proposed composting facility is considered • to be an innovative/alternative technology, the composting plant would be eligible for additional funding amounting to 20 percent of the capital cost to address current facility requirements. Table E-9 within Appendix E shows the estimated total capital cost for the recommended composting program to be $3,485,000. When engineering and administration costs of 15 percent are added to this amount, the total . project costs become $4,008,000. Staging the purchase of a second front-end loader will reduce this to $3,858,000. The capital cost is based on the construction of a facility to compost the sludge quantities expected during the design year. While the facilities will be built to serve the design year population, grant funding will be available only for those facilities required to serve the current population. Using the ratio of current population to design year popula- tion, approximately 65 percent of the capital cost, or $2,508,000, is eligible for grant funding. Singe composting provides a product which will be used beneficially, it is anticipated that 75 percent funding will be available. At this funding level, the grant amount will be approximately $1,881,000. The remaining capital cost, $1,977,000, vill be provided by the City of Longmont. Funds are currently available in the wastewater utility reserves for the Longmont portion of the capital costs. The actual grant amount and City share will be dependent upon actual construction cost and the determination of current capacity requirements. To aid in the determination of eligible costs, it is recommended that the • construction contract be bid on a unit price basis. The operation and maintenance costs of the composting facility will impact the residents of Longmont at a level of $0.38 per person per month. This amount has been estimated based on the anticipated operation and maintenance costs and projected population for the year 2000. While 5-4 . ��1 ?r, increasing the cost of service, the City of Longmont believes that the new facilities can be operated without an increase in the current rate structure. F. ENVIRONMENTAL SUMMARY The final environmental rating of the alternatives based on the • rankings in Tables 4-2 and 4-3 showed the sludge oxidation method to have the highest, most environmentally beneficial score. Costs and concerns about long-term reliability associated vith sludge oxidation, hovever, lead to a decision for composting as the recommended alternative. Composting raw sewage sludge offers an environmentally sound alterna- tive for the management of WWTP solid residues. Sludge collected in a WWTP contains organic and inorganic constituents vhich will compost readily with the addition of bulking materials and external air. Volatile solids reduction takes place by microbial decomposition vith the generation of heat and water vapor. After curing, the compost can be used as future bulking material or distributed to the public to recycle the nutrients inherent in the raw material. This recycling aspect is environmentally beneficial to the City of Longmont and the surrounding end users. The proposed design will include a covered compost area. A berm and sealed asphalt base will also be provided. This will protect the surround- ing area from runoff or leachate percolation. By enclosing three sides of the building, the City of Longmont vill ensure that year-round operation can take place, adding to the reliability of the project. The siting of the project is proposed for the Longmont landfill located in Weld County. The site is environmentally suited for this type of operation. Noise, dust, and exhaust production will not be appreciably different from the current landfilling operation being practiced on the site. The other sites described earlier in relation to land application • would also be suitable for the location of a compost operation. Some of these sites might actually be perferable to the landfill site from the standpoint that there may be some potential difficulty in stabilizing the ”rCS?,.", 5-5 fill material as a base for the new facilities. However, a positive aspect to locating the compost operation at the Longmont landfill is the relatively short, direct route sludge trucks would take from the WTP. In summary, the following items make composting the recommended plan: • Use of raw undigested sludge. • • Reliability of the composting operation. • Recycling of nutrients. • • Proven technology. • Previous successful City of Longmont experience. • Adequate sites for location of composting operations. • 5-6 • Appendix A • • I APPENDIX A LIST OP ABBREVIATIONS • APPEND$ A LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS eve average GODS biochemical oxygen dammed measured at 20o Centigrade • after five days of incubation Btu British thermal unit Centigrade CDR Colorado Department of Health CDPS Colorado Discharge Permit System cfs cubic feet per second COD chemical oxygen demand CHAS complete miz activated sludge DRS dry weight solids ENE-BCI Engineering News Record—Building Cost Index EPA Environmental Protection Agency g Farenheit ft feet ft2 square feet ft3 cubic feet fps feet per second sped gallons per capita per day gpd gallons per day gpd/ft gallons per day par lineal foot gpd/ft2 gallons per day per square foot gpm gallons per minute hp horsepower • I/ innovative and alternative II infiltration/inflow kW kilowatts lbs pounds max maxtmm mls milliliters mgd million gallons per day A_1 nC,C ,?/�_ mg/kg milligrams per kilogram mg/1 milligrams per liter K nitrogen NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System 06M operation and maintenance • P phosphorus pH hydrogen ion concentrations ppcd pounds per capita per day ppd pounds per day psi pads per square inch Q7-10 seven-day. 10-year low flow EAS return activated sludge ESC rotating biological contactors rpm revolutions per minute SSES Satyr System Evaluation Survey scfm standard cubic feet per minute TDS total dissolved solids tamp temperature TIN total TQeldahl nitrogen TSS total suspended solids VS volatile' solids WAS waste activated sludge WWTP wastewater treatment plant WQCC Water Quality Control Commission WQCD Water Quality Control Division • A 2 coon ^, • Appendix B s ^rs� • APPENDIX B BACKGROUND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT DATA • nrC R?^ A. INTRODUCTION This section describes the existing environment that would be affected by the proposed project. Such a description provides a baseline for comparing the expected future environmental effects of project alternatives. Potential sites are identified in the Longmont area on which the 4 proposed project can be located. The sludge management alternatives to be considered are: land application, composting, and below-ground aqueous- phase oxidation. See Figure 8-1 for proposed locations. 1. LAND APPLICATION SITES_ Nine locations have been identified as prospective sites for the land application of digested sludge. The sites were selected based on the following criteria: o Sites within a 5 mile radius of the Wastewater Treatment Facility (WWTF), and o Sites currently permitted or within the permitting process for the land application of sludge during 1987, or o Sites currently engaged in dryland farming operation that may be suitable for future land application sites, or o Previous land application sites, compiled from year 1983. a. Site 41, SWk, 515, T3N, R69W. (1) Physiography and Topography. This 160 acre site is located approximately 4.5 miles from the Longmont WWTF in northern Boulder County and is situated southeast of Terry Lake due north o£ the City of Longmont. It is part of the Colorado Piedmont Section of the Crest Plains Physio- graphic Province. There is no impounded or moving water on this site. The land surface is relatively flat with a peak elevation of 5150 feet • M.S.L., gently sloping 1% to 5130 feet M.S.L. on the east, 5120 feet M.S.L. on the west and north, and 5110 ft M.S.L. at the south at a slope of 2.55. The most outstanding feature of the area is the abrupt wall— n(' A TRRIPf I criti In. NANNY .. • . . L '• 1....: .' 1₹ . • tu \` / �• +- .{ ONION LAKE l. "�.�� cALKIRf . \. �� +� 1 �a ,' + `ca � . .N._ _. \ . S MICR RAMSEtt j Lottomemr Fr- IdIJIMOIML A wwTr . MERMAN as 1 ...1.� ,ARANA RRi Ka t 7 r ,.,„ � ` w. souLDER .K. ROCVOIR -S�~� . ...di l DI1R • \ ./ ... ^✓�./✓l. f</-g // r• 4tZ. i . mate an 1-1 LARD API *ID compost in I Y12 ADDITIONAL ”Ce .47 h NWT, VERTICAL TUBE REACTDR �l FIGURE 8-1 GENERAL SITES LAYOUT like mountain frost forming the boundary between the Front Range and the Piedmont Area. The narrow foothills area is characterized by a series of folded and faulted sedimentary strata. It is currently in dryland wheat strip farming. • (2) Geology. Geologic formations of the area range in age from the Precambrian to Recent. They consist of Precambrian metamorphic and igneous rocks; sedimentary rocks of Paleozoic and Mesozoic age; a few small bodies of igneous intrusive rock of Tertiary age; and unconsolidated surficial deposits of Quaternary age. The Pierre Shale sedimentary formation crops out just to the east of the foothills area and throughout the northeast part of the area. The Quaternary deposits in the area are o£ 4 principle kinds: alluvial, slope-wash colluvtum, eoltaa silt and l sand, and talus and landslide deposits. This site is evidenced by eolium (windblown clay, silt (loess), sand and granules) from the upper Holocene to Bull Lake Glaciation. It is r light brown to reddish brows to olive-gray deposits appearing mainly as a blanket o£ loess as much as 15 feet thick but generally less than 3 feet thick.2 This rolling upland unit is located iu the Upland Subsection of the Piedmont Section of the Great Plains Province. It is described as an area which is underlain by shale and sandstone bedrock in part eeel-bearing. The bedrock is generally nearly flat lying and locally faulted and folded. It is close or at the surface along some incised drainage courses.3 (3) Soils.1 The Nunn-Heldt Association is the soil association • present in this site. It is generally identified as nearly level to moderately sloping, deep soils on terraces and uplands. The soils of this site formed from clay parent materials slope from 0-9X. This associ- ation makes up about 20% of the area including this site. It is about 55% Nunn soils and about 15% Heldt soils. Ascalon, Colby, Gaynor, Kim, Kutch, Longmont, Renohill, Valmont and Weld make up the remaining 30%. nee;'jam TABLE, R-1 I.4 SOIL PROPERTIES LONGMONT, CO AREA Depth to Seasonal Depth High Depth to Prom Parma— Avail, H2O Slope H2O Table Bedrock Surface ability Drainage Aprox. Capacity (in. Reaction Soil Type (I) (f t.) (ft:) _all_ Texture (in,/hr.) Class CEC (H20/in, Soil) (pH) illi 1-3 5 60 0-60 SICL 0.6-2.0 W 15 0.19-0.21 7,4-8.♦ 3-5 3 60 0-60 SILL 0.6-2.0 W 13 0.19-0.21 7.4-8.4 0-3 5 60 0-60 SICL 0.2-0.6 W 13 0.19-0.Z1 7.4-9.0 Ct 5-9 5 60 0-60 SICL 0.6-2.0 W 15 0.19-0.21 7.4-0.4 Gag 1-3 5 20-40 0-30 SICL 0.2-0.6 W 15 0.14-0./6 7.9-8.4 30 SHALE CAD 3-9 S 60 0-30 SICL 0.2-0.6 W 10-13 0.14-0.16 7.9-8.4 30 SHALE Heft 0-3 5 60 0-20 C 0.06-0.2 MW 15 0,14-0.16 7.48.4 20-60 CL 0.2-0.6 MW 15 0.15-0.17 7.4-8.4 HeC 3-5 5 60 0-20 C 0.06-0.2 MW IS 0.140.16 7.48.4 20-60 CL 0.2-0.6 MW 15 0.15-0.17 7.4-8.4 NuA 0-1 5 60 0-10 CL 0.2-0.6 W 15 0.17-0.21 6.6-7.8 10-23 C 0.06-0.6 W 15 0.14-0.16 7.4-8.4 23-60 CL 0.2-0.6 W 15 0.19-0.21 7.4-8.4 NuB 1-3 5 60 0-10 CL 0.2-0.6 W 15 0.17-0.21 6.6-7.8 10-23 C 0.06-0.6 W 15 0.14-0.16 7.4-8.4 23-60 CL 0.2-0.6 W 15 0.19-0.21 7.4-8.4 SgE 3-20 5 10-20 0-13 L 0.6-2.0 W 10-15 0.16-0.18 7.4-8.4 was 1-3 5 60 0-12 SAL 2.0-6.0 W 3-10 0.1-0.15 6.6-7.3 12-36 CL 0.06-0.6 W 15 0,14-0.16 6.6-7.3 36-60 L 0.2-2.0 W 15 0.16-0.20 7,4-8.4 W1A 0-1 5 60 0-6 L 0.6-2.0 W IS 0.16-0.18 6.6-7.3 6-12 C 0.06-0.2 W 13 0.14-0.16 6.6-7.3 12-60 L 0.6-2.0 W 15 0.16-0.18 7.4-8.4 W1B 1-3 5 60 0-60 L 0.6.2.0 W 15 0.16-0.18 6.64.3 6-12 C 0.06-0.2 W 15 0.14-0.16 6.6-7.3 12-60 L 0.6-2.0 W 15 0.16-0.18 7.4-8.4 WoC 3-5 5 60 0-6 L 0.6-2.0 W 15 0.16-0.18 6.6-7.3 6-12 C 0.06-0.2 W 15 0.14-0.16 6.6-7.3 12-60 L 0.6-2.0 W 15 0.16-0.18 7.4-8.4 &vole -- 0.5-1.0 60 0-48 — 48-60 SA 20 r 10-15 0.04-0.06 7.4-8.4 Actuante -- 0.5-1.0 60 0-48 — 48-60 SA 20 P 10-15 0.04-0.06 7.4-8.4 Caecajo 5-20 6 60 0-9 CSAL 2.0-6.0 E 5-10 0.07-0.09 7.4-8.4 9-31 GSAL 6.0-20.0 E 5-10 0.05-0.08 7.4-8.4 31-60 (SAL 6.0-20.0 E 3-10 0.05-0.06 7.4-8.4 Wiley 3-5 6 60 0-11 SIL 0.6-2.0 W 10-15 0.19-0.21 7.4-7.8 11-60 SICL 0.6-2.0 W 15 0.19-0.21 7.9-8.4 gar Sandy III,- Sandy Loam SICL - Silty Clay Loam C - Clay CL - Clay Loam L - Loam CSAL - Gravelly Sandy Loam SIL - Silty Loam W - Well-Drained MW - Moderately Well-drained P - Poorly Drained E - Excessively Drained c er VJ"t7 I 2- Term Lan d ,.. 4 RADMT\......._,/z 6 R.OIwT ��.../ 4 \>-3 r , I 1:: • !Oran LAKE 6:; C',. ,....,,� ,:. _/ / 6.�j�� ,w': .. 2 ..._.a. Rte.` ' ; \ 'f .i. 'I 1 7 MILE R...US .� - _.4� ••, WI"7 otpaCipaL POWWOW --� wwn 3 1 6 7 �/\1 J ADERININ RES, g i• 7 1 4 i 6 ..0✓ NNAYA RES Na l S es ,- • yw RouLOER Rocco, 1 Er:, Y . 5 1 •ANt.L �..N. T KILL \ o / d -v• i 2. BOULDER ///. �� '46.7 •!/7i ,J LEOEHD 1 ROCK oUTCRO►-JUDET-EALLER E NEDERLANO-YALNONT D SAYSIL-SHINGLE Clf CS",A. - 4 MELO-COLON 3 ASCALON-Nun-wwTER II NUNN-HELOT 7 NIMOT-LOWMAN°.CALKIN$ FIGURE B-2 GENERAL SOIL TYPES The Nunn soils are nearly level to moderately sloped and have a surface layer of clay loam or sandy clay loam and a subsoil of clay. The Heldt soils are nearly level to gently sloping and have a surface layer and subsoil of clay. The soil types present at this site include: CoC (Colby-silty clay • loam), Ct (Colby-Gaynor Association), Call (Gaynor-silty loam), Hell (Heldt clay), HeC (Heldt-clay), and NuB (Nunn-sandy clay loam). See Table B-1 for soils data. See Figure B-2 for a depiction o£ the general soil associations of the area. Colby Series This series is made up of deep, well-drained soils. The soils formed on upland slopes in loamy, uniform wind-deposited material. Slopes are 1 to 9% and the elevations are 4900 ft M.S.L. to 5500 ft M.S.L. In a representative profile the surface layer is brown silty clay loam about 12 inches thick. Underlying this is pale brown and light yellowish-brown silty clay loam and clay loam about 48 inches thick. Soil reaction is moderately alkaline. The soil is strongly calcerous throughout the profile and contains soft lime segregations below a depth of 43 inches. Colby soils have moderate permeability and the available water capacity is high. Gaynor Series This series is made up of moderately deep, well drained soils. These soils formed on uplands in loamy alluvial and wind-laid materials. Slopes are 1-9S and elevations are 4900 ft M.S.L, to 5500 ft M.S.L. In a representative profile the surface layer is light olive—brown. silty clay • loam about 6 inches thick. Below this is a light olive—brown silty clay loam about 4 inches thick with an underlying material of light yellowish— brown silty clay loam about 20 inches thick. Tinder this is soft calcareous silty shale. The soil reaction is moderately alkaline. This soil has moderately slow permeability and the available water capacity is moderate. Heldt Series This series is made up of deep, moderately well drained soils formed as terraces and uplands in loamy alluvium weathered from sedimentary rock. The slopes are 0-5% and elevations range from 4900 £t M.S.L. to 5500 ft M.S.L. In a representative profile the surface layer is grayish- • brown clay about 8 inches thick. The upper 12 inches of subsoil is strongly calcareous, light olive-brown clay. The lower 16 inches are strongly calcareous, light yellowish-brown clay loam. The substratum is strongly calcareous light yellowah-brown clay loam to a depth of 60 inches or more. The soil reaction is moderately alkaline with slow permeability. The available water capacity is high. Nunn Series This series is made up of deep, well drained soils formed on terraces and valley side slopes in loamy alluvium. The slopes range from 0-9% and elevations of 4900 ft M.S.L. to 5500 ft M.S.L. In a representative profile the surface layer is grayish—brow clay loam about 10 inches thick. The subsoil is brown and very pale brown clay that grades to clay loam about 20 inches thick. It is noncalcareous in the upper part but contains soft lime segregation in the lower part. The substratum is strongly calcareous, very pale brow clay loam extending to a depth of 60 inches or more. In the surface layer the soil reaction is neutral. In the upper part of the subsoil it is mildly alkaline grading to moder— ately alkaline in the lower part. These soils have a slow to moderately slow permeability and the available water capacity is high. (4) Water • (a) Ground Water. Ground water information is based on United States Geological Survey (USGS) investigations taken during the test year 1976-1977. This site lies within an area where localized water-table aquifers occur in colluvial, landslide, and windblown deposits and in consolidated sedimentary rocks where rocks near land surface are fractured and weathered. The aquifers may not be saturated year-round, however, the depth to waiter table generally ranges from 5-20 feet with a seasonal water table depth generally less than 10 feet. The depth to water table results of wells tested during the test years in the area north and east of the City of Longmont showed a range of 3 to 12 feet below the surface. (See Figure B-3) . The area to the northeast of Longmont lies within a region where the • dissolved solids concentration in ground water is generally greater than 500 mg/l. See Table B-2 for ground water chemical constituents of the area. Probable well yields from the northeast Longmont area show generally less than 50 gpm. Yields cannot be sustained throughout. the year from wells in the Gun Barrel Hill area because of unconsolidated alluvial deposits which are drained for part of the year. In a study conducted by the USGS comparing depth to water table data for the late 1950's to the late 1970's results showed that in a well located in consolidated sedimentary rock the depth to water table increased by 20%; from 16.1 to 20 feet. This indicates that a wide-spread ground water depletion is possibly occuring.5 (b) Surface Water. Surface water resources near this site include Terry Lake northwest, Divide and Walker Reservoirs northeast, Rough and Ready Ditch southwest, Calkins (Union Reservoir) southeast, and the St. Vrain Creek which flows south of site about 4.5 miles away. The site is not within the 100 year flood plain of the St. Vrain. (See Figure B-4). The City of Longmont is supplied by drinking water which originates in the mountains west of the city at Button Rock Reservoir as well as eother sources. A series of aqueducts and pipelines bring the water to a filtration plant on S.R.66 west of Hygiene, Colorado where it is treated and stored prior to flowing to the City. The following are factors which do and will continue to affect the quality of the St. Vrain Creek: o Agricultural Retention flow - 5 large ditches empty to creek. o Stormwater Runoff - 20% of the City of Longmont's sewer system is combined. cv( Of A2 1 now LA•[ c/avloC RNL Maa?ai o`. �h. g II • `.. WITOSN LAKE / \\....� ' // / . � Canna \. !�% + `rr fit, r I\ fi•I i� MIL! RADIUS—+j /Ti "'IIJl� w O� (�7�y� Anent `WWTF t r eit.AG,Ew RR RCS 4 �J /. PANAMA RC&NO.i -. • .'4,,: i. Y • aY (' .._y-7.,... ppUUlL lir.;.,.-..:-9-ii ;-;.: ail %......1..� 2! / Q_ MILL \ « _3' \,>•••••/. f/` BOULDER /_/. Isi '//, l[6ENB • WCLL LOCATION • 0CATN N[AlUREIKN7 1 in FeCT n- C 7?�. . N FIGURE B-3 DSPTI1 TO GROUND WATER TABLE B-2 SUMMARY OF SELECTED CHEMICAL CONSTITUENTS OF WELL WATER FROM LONGMONT, CO AREA SAMPLED IN CONSOLIDATED ROCK AND WINDBLOWN DEPOSITS5 d Exceeding • Parameter Units Standard Range d Samples Standard Dissolved Solids mg/1 500 a 223 — 3903 19 13 Dissolved Arsenic ug/1 50 b 1 — 1 15 0 Dissolved Chloride mg/1 250 a 1.2 — 370 69 2 Dissolved Fluoride mg/1 1.8 b 0.4 — 3.3 16 2 Dissolved Iron ug/1 300 a 1 — 2200 17 2 Dissolved Manganese ug/1 50 a 1 — 410 16 3 Dissolved Magnesium mg/1 125 a 14 — 320 19 5 Dissolved Nitrate/ mg/1 10 b 0.02 — 40 68 12 Nitrite as N Dissolved Selenium ug/1 10 b 1 — 160 15 2 Dissolved Sulfate mg/1 250 a 21 — 2600 19 11 Hardness o£ CaCO3 mg/1 None 120 - 2200 19 -- a - Recommended State Standards for Public Water Supplies (Colorado Dept. of Health - 1971), with the exception of Magnesium, standards are the same as recommended Federal Standards established for the Public Water Supplies (U.S. EPA - 1977). No Federal Magnesium standard. b - Primary (Mandatory) State Standards for Drinking Water Supply - same as Mandatory Federal Standards established for Drinking Water Supplies • (U.S. EPA - 1976). Standard for Fluoride is based on annual average of maximum daily air temperature in study area. ^recz2-: ,- • MARV LAN[ SPIV" KS' MOIA TII ,` .(dY^ •:• . Iz ki • s \%\ • tc NTOSN lAK[ % �/ \`.. N` �r\\ d CALKINS ..‘ // / \ ,, , \` • \ n'. w�[ _� .. \.v. 3 MILE N101U3 Ih /Ainorice • Ai.^ t . z..\:772-- �.` ....... /nrLAaO1MAN NCI 4 . V 7 I V PANAMA PIS MO.I 5 w a ,N i • • ' ,I\ • GIIM .A�SILL N T \ �y{ am Stit \\]\/1\ ` r'' • i �.. \.... H�` �j� 90ULOER ��'i�, wl ;;;„ _ ,,, • nro.,A .N • FIGURE B-4 FLOOD PLAIN-100 YEAR o Landfill leachate - the Landfill is located in weld County adjacent to the creek. o Septic hauler disposal - unknown amounts of septage is covertly and illegally dumped. o Lime pile runoff. o Mining and dewatering from gravel operations. o Cement manufacturing. o City o£ Longmont WWTP effluent.6 The Land application of sludge will not adversely affect the quality of the St. Vrain Creek. Precautions will be taken to assure safe and clean transport of the sludge to the disposal site. Sites will be ehesen where runoff will be minimized. (5) Air (a) Climate. This site along with the entire Longmont area has a high plains, continental climate with wide variation in temperature throughout the year. Pour different sources influence Longmont's weather. These include arctic air from Canada and Alaska; warm, moist air from the Gulf of Mexico; warm dry air from Mexico and the southwestern deserts; and Pacific Ocean air modified by its transit over the mountains to the west. The majority of weather systems come from the west and lose most of their moisture before reaching the area accounting for a low annual precipitation of 13.0 inches, moderate average relative humidity of 52%, and sunshine 70% of the time. The average yearly temperature is 48.8'1+. Daytime average summer (April through September) relative humidity is • 36%. Daytime average winter (October through March) relative humidity is 44%. Generally, early morning humidity ranges from 55-60% in summer, and from 60-70% in the winter.7 The length of the growing season is 140 days with the average date of first killing frost being September 28. The average date of the last killing frost is May 11.1 The mean number of days per year when the maximum temperature fails to reach 32• is 22.6 days. Table B-3 shows climatic data for the Longmont area. n v 7� . to .r 2 �r1(�yy�l T p� a CY CO Ce. d on A in b O I` el N 00 r CO O r r N ON V1 .C O O V1 d O •v • • • ••• 00.-. O O O •-• N r r r O O O e•1 r ev O •d. •C CO w •-• x .C V C .• .. C 0 Rs Y .••. .•I d m Ch Vl ••N TI ,C O e•1 r. .D T V1 CO O •r .O V1 ea p• N .O O O O. V F M C O O O m r r r O O •-• • •-• •-• CP •-• e•1 O • V .e ^• co v M O. w 0. j N O H el r• d y r e•1 O O• O O O O I. r p. r r v+ ••• O y A 07 eat CC N .. N e•1 NO . • a• O T •"• X8 'el ... r d O 00 (p V1 •/1 CO CO O P/ N or. .as � p• av ' CO N N L▪ H T b r .0 .O r. .O N T ••• O b O CO N .O O d el e•1 el v In NO r` b .O V1 r1 e•1 •C n N . W e h r ./ S CO E• O el 4 V m C5 G du OC H '8 00 v IN. co r •C Ch O• O et CO e•1 N V1 p. N m f• 0Oy CO H .O in e. O. .O CD N r• • • • • • • • • • I • • • NCO CO b in O N N 6 U d d ."'• M .1 d V1 ` r`.O r V1 -Cr r• N V1 r` N a O 6 e U .4 d E d la W 6 V 00 7 Y H RS N H •-• •O co e. N C0 P• N V1 N , O N N d C d r N r V1 N .C NO .C .7 •C N N .O .O N N • 9 N e•1 en d in in r •C e•1 N r e1 V. r d r • d h. W 0 0 CO 03 M ® N r r •O T O w r e•1 v0 N o •0 N M Is • • • • • • • • • . ( • CO X CD N ON e•1 N O• e+t P r. N e•1 O Co V1 cr. CO • .•C O •A d .O .O .D CO CO CO n •O ul el NO 00 M ▪ X 13 F al �, � - ...,c" -A r is 3 a ..C .O NO .O Of NO NO b V1 Vl •.0 .O V1 d M CO CO 00 CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO O 67 x co C M r N .7.C V1 •O I CD Cr O r � rl ! S? r r F0 0.7Cr Iml 0. Z r F <X Y Winter conditions can hinder the land application of sludge, creating a necessity for storage or alternative treatment and disposal method- ologies. The prevailing winds of the area are from the south with an mean speed of 8-9 miles per hour, with peak gusts of over 50 miles per hour. ® This would tend to favor northeast land disposal sites (b) Air Quality. This site is located in an area of relatively good air quality. The major source of air pollution is wind-borne dust (particles) from roads, agricultural activity, and industry in and around the City of Longmont. The USEPA has established the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for 6 pollutants: carbon monoxide, ozone, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, particulate matter and lead. The current standards and 1985 air quality results are presented in Table B-4. Primary standards are intended to protect public health; whereas, secondary standards are intended to protect public welfare. The 100 ug/m3 annual geometric mean observed value for total suspended particulates not only exceeds the EPA standards but also exceeds the State of Colorado standards of 45 ug/m3.9 The following factors adversely affect the quality of air in the City of Longmont: O 2 coal burning foundaries. O Odor from the turkey processing plant. Because of the prevailing south wind and the locations of the proposed ® land application sites, the air quality of the City will not be adversely affected by the proposed disposal method. (6) Biotic Components. (a) Terrestrial Ecosystems. The entire Longmont area, can be divided into various ecosystems or vegetational classes: plains grass— land, plains streamside, lakes and earshes and agricultural land. The h;,0c7 W w 0 O 0 .. . .. O l! o N O O w 44 y 00) '0 C Co .. .. L 7 N O O N W .S. d st M M CO 1 to •7 .p j "1 C G 0 N y 4 r d M CO > d V1 Y1 O O �• CI M 7 N • • C .0 d N Q 00 CO It) v • 0 t+1 O O O O O O .. ... A O O O O O r 44 7 C�j I •. L .. O 6 0' L .. N 45 • m Q N N O't.'1 P1 a, 0, 1�, sc 4. a z - c 0. z C .I•4 w 44 44 V) .°. 0. d d CL1 0 O O V 0 E. N B N '7 b b T. T. T. T. ® 8 • .. .. 4. .. .0 .0 .0 .0 DO CO e a .. tray a 7 a .. .. .. .. C C W C n L 3 .. S $ IS x 4 44 $ S Z .El °: .n L 1 � = yy8 e ,.] P'1 O pp J1 O •41 O ./1 O 00 CI :5 4 1 •0 8 00 d 8 00 60 � b w .n 1 .T 7 tt C� O C O N r P1 P'1 e4 s 1 C� a D1 h 7 O O ^" 0 40 V - al cid 04 p.i `P .. W `J' m t O ° a w IC CU o . C F E" • t « C4 ta el � w � � d F C 8 • • O � •. r 0 m3 6 f'+ M XI .. LIU I. og CO mac y co 0 .0 0. a 4 b b6 1 d.. a d K <1 C Oh G. G. G C. O. Y 6C. N G. 01 Y O� W N d �' FT r ea M CI OO y W .. L N A. O O O. O Is 0 Is .. .U. O O L o W O. 0 w M M M d O. 40 ••• • y C n O d 4.0 AO I. M K 44 "I 00 8 a65 SCb M M M MC I. C 14 L d C W C L y L a ~ C M t9 � is is s .c e rs V y2 a0 F al CO al .It .i Nc1 .(-p1 .-IIS NN C .Tr TB ..• V) < C7 7 7 7 -4 .-4 CC i1 '� 1 6 1 6C' a 7, L i i L v o. .+ •o 0m C L ed 61 W d C d M O 47 Cs to wi ...Jarsy 90 I.4 Ol AM I". y CO) T. O N N C W b y IC l0 ./ .... Z Ca 0.Y Y • CO mm C y (1 v v W /. O .0 "m ¢ O C _ .p. u4o..u J C ... O 00.0 M 'O CA u .fie d fa is CO U F Z v ti r1 LC 0 Y 0 s O S y 'O , 0 L0 X L 0, `° X 0 = 0 coo HD. 3 x s 6.. f. types of wildlife habitat include: openland habitat, wetland habitat, and the rangeland habitat. The openland habitat consists of cropland, pasture, meadows, and areas overgrown with grasses, herbs, shrubs, and vines. The wetland habitat consists of open, marshy or swampy, shallow water areas where water-tolerant plants grow. The rangelend habitat • consists of wild herbaceous plants and shrubs. This site is agricultural in nature with dryland wheat strip (Triticum aestivum) farming. Examples of other farming crops which can occur in the area include corn, sugar beets, and other garden vegetables.4 See Table B-5. Small areas of wetland vegetation are located in the Longmont area. Tree species which could be present in these areas include Boxelder (Ater negundo) and plains Cottonwood (Populus sargentii). Shrubs and herbs could include Tamanisk (Tamarix .pentandra), Carrizo (Common Reed) (Phragmites communis), water Crowfoot (Ranunculus aquatilis), Pondweed (Potamop`ton spp.), Rush (Juncus spp.), Sedge (Carex spp.), Spike rush (Eleocharis maerostachya) , Watermilfoil (`Sy_riophxllum spicatum), and Willow-herb, northern (Epilobium glandulosum). Other trees which could be found along the creeks and ditches include: Boxelder (Ater negundo), Cottonwood, broad leaf (Populus sargentii), and Russian Olive (Eleagnus angustifolia). Understory shrubs could include Hawthorn (Crategus spp.) and Willow (Salix spp).10 There are no threatened or endangered species of trees on this site or in the immediate area of Longmont. Due to the proximity of impounded water and the terrestrial habitats described above, a variety of birds can be found. • Birds that are considered abundant in the area are the Canada goose (Brenta aanadensis), Redhead (Aythya americans), Horned Lark (Eremophila alpestris), Clift swallow (Petrochelidon pvrrhonota), Black-billed Magpie (Pica pica), American Robin (Turdus migratorius), Starling (Sturnus vulgaris), House Sparrow (Passer domesticus), Western Meadowlark (Sturnella neglecta), Redwinged Blackbird, (AAselaius phoeniceus), Lark sparrow (Chondestes grammacus), and Ring-billed Gull (tarns delawarensis).11 See Table B-6 for a description of the threatened and/or endangered bird species in the area. Reptiles and amphibians common or abundant in the area are the Great • Plains Toad (Bufo cognatus). Woodhouse's Toad (Bufo woodhousei), Boreal Chorus Frog (Pseudacris triseriara macuLata), Leopard Frog (Rana pipiens), Barred Tiger Salamander (Ambystoma tigrinum mavortium), Blotched Tiger Salamander (Ambystoma tigrinum melanostictum), Arizona Tiger Salamander (Ambystoma tigrinum nebulosum), Red-Lipped Plateau Lizard (Sceloporus undulatus erythrocheilus), and Prairie Six-lined Racerunner (Cnemidophorus sexlineatus).12 There are no threatened or endangered reptile or amphibian species within the area. Mammals in the Longmont area which are considered abundant in the wild are: Desert cottontail (Sylvilagus audubonii), White-tailed jackrabbit (Lepus townsendii), Golden-mantled ground squirrel (Spermophilus lateralis), Black-tailed prairie dog (Cynomys ludovicianus), Ord's kangaroo rat (Dipodomys ordii), Western harvest mouse (Reithrodontomys megalotis), 13 Deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus) and Montaine vole (Microtus montanus). See Table B-6 for a description of threatened and/or endangered mammal species within the area. (b) Aquatic Ecosystems. The aquatic ecosystems in the area include the river and ditch streamsides as well as the Lakes and marsh lands. The St. Vrain Creek flows west to east through the area and supports a variety of plant and animal life. SFish species common to waters in the area are: Central stoneroller (Campostroma aromalum), Common carp (Cyprines earpio), Bigmouth shiner (Notropis dorsalis) , Red shiner (Notropis lutrensis), Sand shiner (Notropis stramineus), Fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas). Longnose dace (Rhinichthys cataractae), Cheer Chub (Semotilus atromaculatus), Longnose sucker (Catostamus eatostamus). White sucker (Catostamas commersoni), Plains Killifish SCG 2^ (Fundulus zebrinus), and Green sunfish (Letomis cyanellus).14 See Table B-6 for a description of the threatened and/or endangered fish species in the area. Benthic samplings in St. vrain Creek revealed a variety of midges (Chironomidae), beetles (Baetidae), caddis flies (Bydropsychidae), aquatic • earthworms (Lumbircidae), and round worms (Nematoda) among other insect larvae and snails.15 (c) Threatened and Endangered Species. There are a number o£ plant and animal species in the State of Colorado which are either threatened or endangered with regard to extirpation. Affected plant species within the Lorimer, Boulder, and Weld Counties area include: greenleaf bluebells (Mertensia virdis var. canto), Guars (Guar. neomexicana spp. coloradensis), Whitlow-work (Arabs exunguiculata), and Icegrass (Phippsia algida).� The affected animal species within the tri-county area include: White pelican (Pelecanus erythrorhynchos), Peregrine falcon (Falco peregrinus), Greenback cutthroat trout (Salmo clarki stomias), Johnny darter (Etheostoma nigrum), and Plains orangethroat darter (Etheostama spectabile pulchellum). A listing of other threatened and endangered species within the State of Colorado and specifically within northeast Colorado are in Table B-6.17 See Figure B-5 for an illustration of the present ranges of the threatened and endangered species of the area. The critical wildlife habitats in the area are Rabbit Mountain, Logerman Reservoir (+ wetlands), Lefthand Creek Cottonwood groves (+ wetlands), Gaynor Lakes (+ wetlands) , Panama Reservoir (+ wetlands), and B—J Acres • Ranch.18 These areas will not be affected by the land application of sludge. See Figure B-6 for locations of these critical wildlife habitats. (7) Socioeconomic Factors. This site is located one half mile north of a partially developed residential area. It is bordered on the east by U.S. Read 287 which is designated an "Open Corridor" of Boulder County Open Space. It is bordered by a light-duty road on the south and there ' TERM l �' ,crapeRABBIT Noldru • �r . r7.7 .. s.t....,.... 12 • ` INTOSN LAKE :// �j at a .. CALKINS / j • i/ / • • �a ws m /_ �' E MILE RADOS ' • tmuNICIPAI. AIR►0M0NT 0RY , FwwTT F17 ADERNAN AEI / 2 l 7 jv PANAMA Kira I .r RED.YEVv0IR • h ✓ �..r4" MAIM N If \• N. . ...i ... �....,.........,......0‘.....* i aegr ,�i 4/L JOHNNY DARTER .b E E- MRNYE PELICAN ^.v 1 q?'. FIGURE B-S PRESENT RANGES OF THREATENED CO ENDANGERED WI DUFE TERRY LAIC crIVCC IIIIS ,.� I. o . . . 4. RAN14 l *• �� 3SJ' .S CRITIGL ,s r ,..d+..., pavntp AT _ -1. I₹ �`. th • . \. • + �n�. \ .. . �. �� 1 S RNLI RADIUS CHONGIIONT 1 Aeon ` t C` / ...wwTr < S y ,/;‘7, i.4 ADlRYAR RlS. y 1 �s . 9 g CRITICAL WILOLIK • CRITICAL IIAlITAT W y LEFT HARD OR[KR ../ GROWSCOTTONWOOD ,/�-�/ oRls i .� PANAMA In NO.1 7 Tins_ ilium WAIT MMAV ? ..` "... ACRES BOULDER RANCH RaevaR ..r i WIN+ s. \ / �. ,.' Sel Wu re I r pDULplR La4 1 • FIGURE a-s CRITICAL wILoure HABITATS is an unimproved dirt road on the west of the site which leads to a few residences offsite. The site is currently used for agriculture, a use compatible for the ]and application of sludge. The site is located within an area designated as Significant Agri- cultural Land of National Importance. Prime significant farmlands have . adequate and dependable water supplies, favorable temperatures, and a growing season, good soil characteristics, protection from floods, slight slope, and historically good yields. On this site the following are not present or proposed: county trails, road or expressway expansion, or transit expansion. A bike lane is proposed along the east boundry. The site is not within any critical wildlife habitats, natural landmark area, or natural area. and it is not an archeologically or historically sensitive area. The prominent cultural resource of site is the scenic mountain vista seen to the west.18 With any land application of sludge this resource will be maintained. b. Site #2, NPk, S13, T3N, R69N. (1) Physiography and Topography. This 60 acre site is approxi— mately 5 miles from the Longmont WWTF in northern Boulder County and is situated east of Divide and Walker Reservoirs and northeast o£ the City of Longmont. It is part of the Colorado Piedmont Section of the Great Plains Physiographic Province. There is no impounded water on this site, however, the Supply and Highland Ditches run through the southwestern corner. The surface gently slopes 3% northeast to southwest from 5210 ft M.S.L. to 5110 ft M.S.L. There are no other outstanding physiographic features to this site besides the Front Range described in a.(1). It is • currently in dryland farming. (2) Geology. This site is evidenced by eolium (described in a.(2)) as well as the upper transition member of the Pierre Shale. The deposits are Cretaceous in age and are described as a friable sandstone, soft ahaly sandstone containing thin—bedded sandy shale and large calcareous sandstone concretions. This member can be up to 2000 ft thick.2 See a.(2) for a discussion of the upland unit. PC0 C7r (3) Soils. This site contains mostly the Weld-Colby Association with the Nunn-Heldt Association in the southwest corner. See a.(3) for a discussion of the Nunn-Heldt Association. Weld-Colby Association is identified as nearly level to sloping, deep soils on uploads. The soils are farmed in uniform windblown materials. This association mikes up • about 10% o£ the area including this site. It is 35% Weld soils and about 35% Colby soils. Ascalan, Gaynor, Martel, Nunn and Otero soils make up the remaining 30%. Soil types present are: CoB (Colby-silty clay loam), CoC (Colby-silty clay loam), SgE (Shingle-Gaynor Complex), W1B (Weld loam) and WoB (Weld-Colby Complex). Weld soils are nearly level with a surface layer of loam, fine sandy loam, a loamy sand that is 6 to 14 meters thick. The subsoil is clay or heavy clay loam. Colby soils are mainly greatly sloping to sloping. They have a surface layer and underlying layer of silty clay loam. See Table B-1 for soils data. Shingle Series This series is made up of shallow, well—drained soils formed on upland hills and ridges in calcareous loamy residuum weathered from shale or sandstone. Slopes range from 3-25 percent and elevations are 4900 ft M.S.L. to 5500 ft M.S.L. In a representative profile the surface layer is strongly calcareous, pale-brown loam about 4 inches thick with the next 3 inches being a light yellowish brown loam. The underlying material. about 6 inches thick, is strongly calcareous, brownish-yellow loam with weathered shale and sandstone underlying. In the surface layer the soil • reaction is mildly alkaline. with increasing depth it becomes moderately alkaline. These soils have moderate permeability with low available water capacity. Weld Series This series is made up of deep, well-drained soils formed on smooth uplands, mainly in loamy wind-laid parent material. The slopes range TC S2.� from 0-52 with elevations of 4900 ft M.S.L. to 5500 ft M.S.L. In a representative profile the surface layer is brown loam about 6 inches thick with a 6 inch subsoil of brown clay that grades to a strongly calcareous, pale brown clay loam. The substatrum is strongly calcareous, pale brown loam that extends to a depth of 60 inches or more. In the • surface layer the soil reaction is neutral becoming alkaline with increasing depth. The soils have slow permeability with high available water capatity.1 Colby Series - See a.(3) for a discussion. (4) Water - See a.(4) for a representative discussion. (5) Air - See a.(5) for a representative discussion. (6) Biotic Components - See a.(6) for a representative discussion. (7) Socioeconomic Factors. This site is not within a geological hazard area. It is not archeologically or historically sensitive, nor is it within a critical wildlife or plant habitat, natural landmark, or natural area. This area is not a significant agricultural land, nor are there any open space constraints, proposed county trails, proposed roads or expressways, or any proposed bikeways. 18 e. Site X13, Ntk, S22, T3N, R69W. (1) Physiography and Topography. This 140 acre site is appromi— mately 4 miles from the Longmont WWTF in northern Boulder County and 1s situated southwest of Walker Reservoir and southeast of Terry Lake, north • of the City of Longmont. It is part of the Colorado Piedmont Section of the Crest Plains Physiographic Province. There is no impounded or flowing water on this site. The surface gently slopes 1.52 northwest at 5130 ft M.S.L. to southeast 5085 ft M.S.L. The site is broken up into 7-8 farm plots. (2) Geology - See a.(2) for a representative discussion. (3) Soils. This site contains the Nunn-Beldt soil association. See a.(3) for a further discussion o£ the Nunn-Beldt Association. The types of soils present are: CoB (Colby Silty Clay loam), Ct (Colby Gaynor Association), GaD (Gaynor Silty Clay loam), NaB (Nunn sandy clay loam) ® and WoB (Weld-Colby Complex). See Table B-1 for soils data. See a.(2) for a discussion of the Colby, Gaynor and Nunn Series and b.(2) for a discussion of the Weld Series.1 (4) Water - See a.(4) for a representative discussion. (5) Air - See a.(5) for a representative discussion. (6) Biotic Components - See a.(6) for a representative discussion. (7) Socioeconomic Factors. This site is not within a geologic hazard area. It is not archeologically or historically sensitive, nor is it within a critical wildlife or plant habitat, natural landmark, or natural area. The site is designated nationally significant agricultural land, and it is bounded on the west by a designated U.S. 287, an open corridor. There are no proposed county trails, roads or expressways. There is a bikelane proposed along U.S. 287.18 d. Site 44, N1, 523, T3N, R69W. (1) Physiography and Topography. This 310 acre site is approximately 4 miles from the Longmont WWTP in northern Boulder County and is situated south of Walker Reservoir. It is part of the Colorado Piedmont Section • of the Great Plains Physiographic Province. There is no impoundment water on this site. There is however, a drainage ditch in the southeast section of the site. The surface gently slopes 1-2% from a peak southwest at 5110 ft M.S.L. and east to 5055 ft M.S.L. There is not other out— standing physiographic feature other than those described in a.(1). The site is broken up into numerous farm plots. f?C'CR? (2) Geology - See a.(2) for discussion. (3) Soils. This site contains the Nunn-Heldt soil association. See a.(3) for further discussion of the Nunn-Heldt Association. The type of soils present are: CoB (Colby Silty Clay loam), CoC (Colby Silty Clay loam), NuA (:Yuan clay loam), NuB (Nunn Clay loam), and GaB (Gaynor silty • clay loam). See Table B-1 for soils data. See a.(3) for a discussion of the Colby, Gaynor, and Nunn Series.1 (4) Water - See a.(4) for a representative discussion. (5) Air - See a.(5) for a representative discussion. (6) Biotic Components - See a.(6) for a representative discussion. (7) Socioeconomic Factors. This site is not within a geologic hazard area, nor is it an archeologically or historically sensitive area. It is not within a critical wildlife or plant habitat, natural landmark, or natural area. This site is designated nationally significant agri— cultural land. There are no open space constraints, proposed county trails or roads, or proposed bikeways associated with this site.18 e. Site 115, Ne%, S26, T3N, R69W. (1) Physiography and Topography. This 160 acre site is approxi- mately 3 miles from the Longmont WWTP and is situated northwest of Calkins Lake (Union Reservoir) and northeast of the City of Longmont. It is part of the Colorado Piedmont Section of the Great Plaina Physiographic Province. There is no impounded water on this site, however, the head • waters o£ the Spring Gulch Ditch originate near the middle. The surface barely slopes 1% northwest at 5040 ft M.S.L. to southeast at 5012 ft M.S.L. The site consists of a few farms with residences at the north boundary along SR 66. net ,4 (2) Geology - See a.(2) for a representative discussion. (3) Soils. This site contains the Nunn-Heldt soil association. See a.(3) for a further discussion of the Nunn-Heldt Association. The types of soils present are: NuA (Nunn clay loam), NuB (Nunn clay loam), CoB • (Colby Silty Clay loam), and CsB (Colby Silty Clay loam, wet). See Table B-1 for soil data. See a.(3) for a discussion of the Colby and Nunn Series.l (4) water - See a.(4) for a representative discussion. (5) Air - See a. (5) for a representative discussion. (6) Biotic Components - See a.(6) for a representative discussion. (7) Socioeconomic Factors. This site is not within an archeologically or historically sensitive area, nor is it within a wildlife or plant critical habitat. It is designated a significant agricultural land. There are no open corridor constraints associated with this site. There are no proposed county trails, roads or expressways planned for this site.18 f. Site 66, Nli, 525, T3N, R69W. (1) Physiography and Topography. This 370 acre site is approxi— mately 3 miles from the Longmont WWTF and is situated northwest of Calkins Lake (Union Reservoir) and northeast of the City of Longmont. It is part of the Colorado Piedmont Section of the Great Plains Physiographic Province. • There is no impounded water on this site; bowler, Spring Gulch Ditch passes through at the extreme southwest corner. There is also some wet weather standing water on the north property line. The surface gently slopes 1-2% northwest at 5035 ft M.S.L. to the southeast at 4995 ft M.S.L. The site consists of dairy farm plots 25-50 acres each. There are residences along SR 66 on the north boundary for which a setback must be applied. nro ti? (2) Geology - See a.(2) for a representative discussion. (3) Soils. This soil contains the Nunn-Heldt soil association. See a.(3) for a further discussion of the Nunn-Heldt Association. The types of soils present are: CoB (Colby Silty Clay loam), CoC (Colby Silty Clay loam), CaB (Colby Silty Clay loam, wet), GaB (Gaynor Silty • Clay loam), Gal) (Raynor Silty Clay loam), NuA (Nunn Clay loam), NuB (Nunn Clay loam), and W1A (Weld Loam). See Table e-1 for soil data. See a.(3) for a discussion of Colby, Nunn, and Gaynor Series. See b.(3) for a discussion of the Weld Series.1 (4) Water - See a.(4) for a representative discussion. (5) Air - See a.(5) for a representative discussion. (6) Biotic Components - See a.(6) for a representative discussion. (7) Socioeconomic Factors. This site is not within an archeologi- cally or historically sensitive area, nor is it within a wildlife or plant critical habitat. It is not designated a significant agricultural land. There are no open corridor constraints associated with this site. There are no proposed county trails. roads or expressways planned for this site. There is an existing bike path on SR 66 to the North and a proposed bike lane on County Line Road to the ea st.18 g. Site #7, SGbi, 56, T2N, R69W. (1) Physiography and Topography. This site is within the boundaries of the Longmont Municipal Airport property. There is approximately 140A • of usable land. It is situated 3 miles west of the Longmont WWII, south of St. Vrain Creek. It is part of the Colorado Piedmont Section of the Great Plains Physiographic Province. There is no impounded water on the site, however, there are drainage and irrigation supply ditches on the west border, near the south border and at the North border. The surface is nearly level with a 0.6% slope from 5053 ft M.S.L. west to 5028 ft �c i M.S.L. east. The site is currently being farmed in corn and is the location of the airport facility. A marshy area is located at the northwest boundary along the west ditch, 5120 ft M.S.L. on the west and north and 5110 ft M.S.L, on the south at a slope of 2.5%. (2) Geology. See a.(2) for a representative discussion. This • transitional lowland unit is located in the Lowland Subsection of the Piedmont Section of the Great Plains Province. It is described as an area probably underlain mainly by terrace or upland gravels, covered in part by windblown matertal.2 (3) Soils. This site contains the Nunn—He1dt soil association. See a.(3) for further discussion o£ the Nunn-Heldt Association. The soil type at this site is NuA (Nunn clay loam). See Table B-1 for soil data. See a.(3) for a discussion of the Nunn Series.1 (4) Water - See a.(4) for a representative discussion. (5) Air - See a.(5) for a representative discussion. (6) Biotic Components - See a.(6) for a representative discussion. (7) Socioeconomic Factors. This site, the Longmont Municipal Airport, is of importance to the growth and development of the area. The land within the boundaries which are not associated with the operation of the airport are currently farmed by lease arrangement. Economic development will continue around the airport as the City continues to expand. The fact that the City owns the land and with an airport authority has complete control of the activity on the land makes this site a good candidate for an emergency land application site. In the event that one or more of the other sites is unavailable for application due to permit problems or time constraints, this site can always be available. The same agronomic rates for application can be applied on this site as on the other sites. The only proposed amendments to the area will be expansions of the airport operations. h. Site DS, 55, TIN, R69W. (1) Physiography and Topography. This 640 Acre site is approximately 5 miles south of the Longmont WW1?. It is part of the Colorado Piedmont • Section of the Great Plains Physiographic Province. There is no impounded water within the site with a drainage ditch from Cun Barrel Hill through the south Section 9 of the site to Boulder Creek. The surface in the north two-thirds of the site slopes 3.5% from 5390 ft M.S.L. to 5205 ft M.S.L. (2) Geology - See a.(2) for a representative discussion. The majority of the site is light brown to reddish brown in olive gray deposits appear mainly as a blanket of Loess as much as 15 ft thick but generally less than 3 ft thick. The small area on the top of Gun Barrel Hillis a pre-rocky flats alluvium which is brown to white cemented ground and sand 3-6 feet thick. This is a flat-topped upland unit located in the Upland Subsection of the Piedmont Section of the Great Plains Province. It is described as gravel deposits as much as 15-20 ft thick on flat-topped uplands. Locally, the upper part of the gravel is clayey and calcareous and commonly has a thick strongly developed soil profile. The bedrock shale and sandstone below the gravel may be exposed in bordering slopes or covered by colluvium or windblown silt or sand.2 (3) Soils. This site contains the Weld-Colby soil association. • See b.(3) for a further discussion of this association. Soils present are: Ct (Colby-Caynor association), WeB (Weld fine sandy loam). WoB (Weld-Colby Complex). and WoC (Weld-Colby Complex). Ascalon soils are found in the SW corner but because of slope constraints these will not be described or used as land application soils.1 See Table B-1 for soils data. (4) Water - See a.(4) for representative discussion. Nn r? (5) Air - See a.(5) for representative discussion. (6) Biotic Components - See a.(6) for representative discussion. (7) Socioeconomic Electors. This site is not within a geologic hazard area, nor is it archeologically or historically sensitive. It is • not within a designated wildlife or plant critical habitat. This site contains significant agricultural lands of statewide importance. This section has also been designated as Proposed County Open Space or that ]and which should be left intentionally free from future development. There are no proposed county tracks, roads or expressways planned for the site. A bike lane is proposed to the east on North 95th Street.18 i. Site #9, 54, T1N, R69W. (1) Physiography and Topography. This site is approximately 5 miles from the Longmont WWTF. It is 640 acres in area and is situated south of the City of Longmont. It is part of the Colorado Piedmont Section of the Great Plains Physiographic Province. There is no impounded water on this site, however a drainage ditch does travel west to east through the north half of the site and the Whiterock Ditch is at the east boundary. The surface slopes 2% from west to east, 5222 ft M.S.L. to 5110 ft M.S.L. The most outstanding physiographic feature of the site is the abrupt wall-like mountain front forming the boundary between the Front Range and the Piedmont or plains. The narrow foothills area along the western margin of the Piedmont is characterized by a series of folded and faulted sedimentary strata. (2) Geology. See a.(2) for a representative discussion. The majority of the site is light brown to reddish brown in olive gray deposits appearing mainly as a blanket of loess as much as 15 ft thick but generally less than 3 ft thick. This is a flat-topped upland unit located in the upland subsection of the Piedmont Section of the Great Plains Province. It is described as ne aA gravel deposits as much as 15-20 ft thick on flat-topped uplands. Locally, the upper part of the gravel is clayey and calcareous and commonly has a thick strongly developed soil profile. The bedrock shale and sandstone below the gravel may be exposed in bordering slopes or covered by colluvlum or windblown silt or sand.2 • (3) Soils. This site contains the Weld-Colby soil association. See b.(3) for a further discussion of their association. Soils present are: WeB (Weld-fine sandy loam), WoB (Weld-Colby Complex) and WoC (Weld-Colby Complex). See Table 8-1 for soils data.1 (4) Water - See a.(4) for representative discussion. (5) Air - See a.(5) for representative discussion. (6) Biotic Components - See a.(6) for representative discussion. (7) Socioeconomic Factors. This site is not within a geologic hazard area, nor is it archeologically or historically sensitive. It is not within a designated wildlife or plant critical habitat. This site contains significant agricultural lands of state-wide and national importance. It is not constrained by county open space regulations. There are no proposed county trails, roads or expressways planned fot the site. A bike lane is proposed to the west o£ North 95th Street.18 2. COMPOSTING SITE a. Site 410, Sib Ntk, S8, T2N, R68W - Longmont Cit Landfill Site. (1) Physiography and Topography. This site is approximately 3.5 • miles due East of the Longmont WWTF in western Weld County. It is about 50 acres in area and is bounded On the south and east by the St. Wain Creek. This site is part o£ the Colorado Piedmont Section of the Great Plains Physiographic Province. The slope slopes abruptly with convulsions along the bottom land of the creek. There are areas on the site where the slopes exceed 10%. Elevations range from 4960 ft M.S.L. to 4860 ft n�'OC?,A M.S.L. She site is currently being used as the Longmont City Landfill. The estimated useful life o£ the landfill is 2-3 years. (2) Geology. This site's geology is comparable to that of sites a. and b. in that it is evidenced by eolium as well as Pierre shale deposits. It also contains a Post-Piney Creek Alluvium from the upper • Holocene, a deposit of the quaternary Age. This deposit is adjacent to the St. Vrain Creek. It is a dark-gray humic, sandy to gravelly alluvium, containing scattered plant remains. This underlies flood plains and major streams and terraces less than 10 ft above the stream level and is from 5 to 15 feet thick. This bottomland unit is located in the Lowland Subsection of the Colorado Piedmont Section of the Great Plains Province. It is further described as alluvium with some windblown sediment.2 (3) Soils. The soils of this site are of two association: Aquolls- Aquents-Bankard Association and Wiley-Colby-Weld Association. The majority of this landfill site is located on the Aquolls-Aquents-Bankard type with the Wiley-Colby-Weld occuring at the North of the site. The Aquolls-Aquents-Bankard Association is identified as deep, level and nearly level, poorly drained and somewhat excessively drained loamy soils and sandy loams formed in alluvium. It is about 35% Aquolls, 20% Aquents, 20% Bankard soils, and 25% is soils of minor extent. Aquolls and Aquents form an intermingled complex pattern along the outer limits of the bottom land, or flood plain. Bankard soils are adjacent to the streams. Aquolls and Aquents are poorly drained, whereas Bankards are • somewhat excessively drained. The Wiley-Colby-Weld Association is identified as deep, nearly level to moderately sloping, well-drained silt lotus and loam* formed in calcareous eloian deposits. It is about 30% Wiley, 30% Colby, 15% Weld, and 25% in soils of minor extent. Wiley and Colby soils form an inter- 07z2^, mingled complex pattern on the steeper side slopes. Weld soils are along the narrow ridgetops and on the nearly level sides slopes. Wiley soils have a silt loam surface layer and a silty clay loam subsoil. Wiley Series • This series are plain soils and slopes from 0-5%. The top 11 inches is a pale brown silt loam which is mildly alkaline. The next 13 inches is a pale brown silty clay loam, calcareous and moderately alkaline. The next 10 inches is also pale brown silty clay loam. The lower 26 inches is very pale brown silty clay loam, calcareous, and moderately alkaline.4 See a.(3) for a discussion of the Colby Series and b.(3) for a discussion of the Weld Series. See Table B-1 for soils data. (4) Water - See a.(4) for a representative discussion. (5) Air - See a.(5) for a representative discussion. (6) Biotic Components - See a.(6) for a representative discussion. (7) Socioeconomic Factors. The Longmont City Landfill is currently in operation on this site. It is estimated that the site will be useful for the landfilling of MSW for another 2-3 years. Landfills in general are located in areas where there are few potentially effected residential or commercial developments. The expansion of this landfill site can be accomplished relatively easily because of the sparse population of the area. It would, however, be recommended that a new site be chosen which is not in as close proximity to a navigable stream as the current site • is. The operation of a co-composting process at this site could extend the life of the landfill due to the volume reduction experienced. f_Y o:s?' There are no other socioeconomic constraints associated with this site. 3. ADDITIONAL SITES OF THE AREA. In the event that the combined area of the sites available is not adequate, additional lands should be targeted as potential sites. These lands could include: • o Site 4 11 SEA, S23, T3N, R69W — 160 acres. o Site # 12 Wh, S24, T3N, R69W — 320 acres. These sites offer the same potential as other sites in the area. • c Ccri?•, REFERENCES 1. Soil Survey of Boulder County Area, Colorado, United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, January 1975. 2. R. Colton, Geologic Map o£ the Boulder-Fort Collins—Greeley Area, Colorado, Map I-866-G, 1978. 1111 3. E.J. Crosby, Landforms in the Boulder-Fort Collins-Greeley Area, Front Range Urban Corridor, Colorado, Map I-855-8, 1978. 4. Soil Survey of Weld County, Colorado-Southern Part, United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, September 1980. I 5. D.H. Miller and P.A. Schneider, Well Yields and Chemical Quality of Water from Water-Table Aquifers in the Boulder-Fort Collins-Greeley Area, Front Range Urban Corridor, Colorado, Map I-855-J, 1978. 6. Calvin Youngberg, Engineer, City of Longmont, Colorado, personal communication to R.S. Peoples, Black & Veatch, April 14, 1987. 7. Meteorological Data for 1985, National Climatic Data Center, Asheville, N.C. 8. Climatological Data, Colorado, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Vol. 90-1985, Vol. 91-1986. 9. Colorado Air Quality Data Report, State of Colorado, Department of Health, Air Pollution Control Division, Technical Services Program, 1985. 10. J.W. Marr and D.G. Steward, Vegetation Map of the Colorado Springs- Castle Rock Area, Front Range Urban Corridor, 1979. 11. H.E. Kingery and W.D. Graul, eds., Colorado Bird Distribution Latilong Study, The Colorado Field Ornithologists, 1978. 12. David Langlois, ed., Colorado Reptile and Amphibian Distribution Latticing Study, 1978. • 13. Steven J. Bissell, ed., Colorado Mammal Distribution Latilong Study, 1978. 14. K.D. Fhusch and Lynn H. Schrader, "Use of the Index of Biotic Integrity to Evaluate the Effects of Habitat, Flow, and Water Quality on Fish Communities in Three Colorado Front Range Rivers," Department of Fishery and Wildlife Biology, Colorado State University, 1986. FXt ,7', 15. "1985 Annual Report, St. Vrain Creek, Biosurvey Results, prepared for City of Longmont," Colorado State University, 1985. 16. "An Illustrated Guide to the Proposed Threatened and Endangered Plant Species in Colorado," Ecology Consultants, Inc., Fort Collins, Colorado, April 1978. 17. "Essential Habitat for Threatened or Endangered Wildlife in Colorado," • Wildlife Management Section, Division of Wildlife, Department of Natural Resources, State of Colorad, 1978. 18. "Boulder County Comprehensive Plan, Goals, Policies, and Maps," Boulder County Board of County Commissioners, Adopted, March 12, 1987. • fwer,241/2 TABLE B-5 FARMING CROPS LONGMONT, CO AREA Common Name Scientific Name • Corn tea maps Kentucky bluegrass Poa pratensis Beans Phaseolus spp. Beets Beta vulgaris Cabbage Brassie& oleracea Cauliflower Brassie& spp. Carrot Mucus carota Celery Apium graveoleus Lettuce Lactuca sativa Onion Allium cepa Pumpkin b Squash Cucurbia spp. Radish Raphanus sativus Rhubarb Rheum rhapanticum Spinach • SSpinacia oleracea Tomato Lycopersicum eseulentum • Turnip Brassica app. • (7v, Y C O CO H d ....4 W '0 M 00.d C p � x3 ZZZZZZ 41 0000000 ZYZZZZZZ >0ZZ 1 11 Y Y C y d d 9 '0 CO M .-1 d Y 7 it: a2 o c m �M�pp O W .d V� ' 0 4 .10 7 Ca O W CO 00000 es y 0m1 W O CO 0 0 0 CO 0000000000 . ; C p0.4z zzzzza. >1 >- x >.. zzz >• zalzxzzz ).. HZX 7 C +•1 0 .+ C Y Y N 7 W M 8 p .'1.711:5 mZN m C V 61 W 7 m co is N 03 C.0 V C 010 M ..7.1 %) .-1 M add d ..0 Z d T .C V .+ w 8 m w m .M 7 cl C F-tz 6 H Nt '0 C 2 M 6 7 C 9 mu I cc cc O co Y m t0O�� c s ..W1 is O d .1 7 Y W 7 m q x U CO Wr1 l.. 7 V .4 .'1 W m .1 4.0 . 1 > Y U CN 4' M d "'1 CO Y C 7 ��y0 ro�0 �0 �+ i co0,.+ l0 d 5�00 �p Z Z w 0. CO C T.'1 01 J O.�C C W Y Y .1 X W GJ [-. < $ .1 m N C W M M M V f� C +.1 .1 01 W m V C W 00 ..1 �.] Y O Y 7 W I d •p d 110 co C W Ad ac a W C Y .r V W 0r Wc la 00 V S W� � d W m 7 CO M W ides M Y {0 t0 R�a a a C d te W 11 7 7 A d Y 0p C Z O .1 M C 7 .� CC 10 7 4.1 ‘. .C U4-4 W C .-1 st S CO W O O O W A .� q4W • U m "i 7 0 C <C O W 0 C o 0 Q 00 Q 41 u 0 0! U O O O C C 0 Ds7 7 01 d loigilU •p ..1 m m V p -p• O m md d d t0V S y Y d �I~ ® 00 d YI 7I •'1I.-1I'-BiIA .otoiVYY r. CIH aC3a w �° 2 o. v � �1 �1 �Rzc� � mWwxa oR Y 7 • d Y 7 m Y Y il Y U O 0 7 Y •1 VaV CO V 41 C Y .C at I.: Y M V d N. 11 Y U V 01 X .4 ../ U O V W C A a Y V A .1 Y Y C O 0 .•1 .C1.. 41 W Y Y M c....:,O 0 Y it Y .C Y a d w Cc w V S d d . Y Y/ 1+ 1+ Y ..‘td L 31 d 0 .1 1+ •4010. C .C 7 u d d A A Y Y W U 10 O L q 0 m .1 Y /1 0 'O d 7 Y > 001. 60077 �lp� d Y V w m .1 0 L C V .1 .1 y t �0 Y C m Cr '7 '7 Q1 Y d T1 d Si m A V C0 d a s V U'7 Y m W W d .0 OW d Y . 1 d "1 0. Y CO W 'b aL 0 Y a6 00 C 1+ O O '-1 C Y d C 00 0. Op C V O 0l SAC CO q O C1 0 O d d '.law O .1 O 0.+1 (0 Y- d C Y {p �p 00 .-1 0< M Y 01 d Y M W d M B d C .mM U OD '� CO B 10 Z W 1Y1pp C y ea aG d Y d 70 V W is O.Y V' 0 1+ C M B m C C C Y Y <ii 'p IA 1 O r1 N V 0 > C ; M d 4 10 m W O a O d S .1C C 9 Y A ~ N .-01 m O .C C U .-1 Y O T./ H ~ d ~ Y W Y Y ./ M O 7 Y 0 a. O `+ O i- W CISmvx 1a alc. a� c� °.� o. �sv lslac� c� :CISse -� c oEc� as 1 1 M H Z 0 d d 01 0 0 m Y 0 01 d V 01 0 0 h. V Y V Y 0 01 V M V 01 d < Y AS d TABLE B-7 BIRDS OF NORTHCENTRAL COLORADO The following listing includes bird species which are breeding or non-breeding year-round or nesting season residents. They are also. to • the extent of distribution. abundant or common (at least 1/acre as breeders): White Pelican Pelecanus erythrorhynchos Canada Goose Brenta canadensis Mallard ADAs plaryrhynchoe American Wigeon Maraca americana Redhead Aythya americana American Coot Pulletsamerlosna Killdeer Charadriue voci£erua Rock Dove Columba Livia Mourning Dove Zensidure macroura Great Horned Owl ' Bubo virginianns White-throated Swift Aeronautea saxatalis Broad-tailed Humming Bird Selasphorus platycercus Common Flicker Colaptes eafer Red-headed Woodpecker Metanerpes erythrocephalus Horned Lark $remo hp ilia alpeatria Violet-green Swallow Tachycineta thalassina Tree Swallow Irldoprocne bicolor Barn Swallow Hirundo rustics Cliff Swallow Petrochelidon emrhonota Black-billed Magpie Pica pica American Robin 2tirdus Migratorius Hermit Thrush Hylocichla gutters Starling Sturnus vulpp ria Virginia's Warbler Vermivora virginiae Yellow Warbler Dendroica petechis Black-throated Gray Warbler Dendroica nlgrescens Common Yellowthroat Geothlypis trichas • Wilson's Warbler Wilaonia ua� 117a Western Meadowlark Sturnella neglecta Yellow-headed Blackbird Xenthocephalua xanthoeephalus Red-winged Blackbird Agelaius phoeniceus Brewer's Blackbird Enphagus cyanocephalus Common Grackle Quiscalus vincula House Finch Carpodacus mexicanus Vesper Sparrow Pooecetes grammineua n Lark Sparrow Chondestes pammecus ,:e' Gray—headed Junco Junco canteens Chipping Sparrow Spizella .passerine C". ca Brewer's Sparrow Spizella breweri White-crowned Sparrow Zonotrichia leneophrys TABLE B-8 FISH SPECIES OF THE SOUTH PLATTE RIVER BASIN Common Name Scientific Name • Clupeidae gizzard shad Dorosoma cepedianum Salmonidae kokanee Oncorhznchus narks mountain whitefish Prosopium williamsoni greenback cutthroat trout Salmo clarki sromias rainbow trout Salmo gairdneri brown trout Salmo tratta brook trout Salvellnus fontinalis Artie grayling Thymallus arctieus Esocidae northern pike Fsox lucius Cyprinidae central stoneroller Campostoma anomalum goldfish Carasaius auratus lake chub Contains plumbeua common earp Cyprinus carpio brassy minnow Hybognathus hankinsoni plains minnow Hybognathus alacitua hornyhead chub Nocomis biguttatus golden shiner Notemigonus cryaoleucaa common shiner Notropis cornutus bigmouth shiner Notropis dorsalis blacknose shiner Notropis heterolepis red shiner Notropis lutrensis • sand shiner Notropis atramineua suCkermouth minnow Phenacobiue mirabilis northern redbelly dace Phoxinus toe £inescale dace Phoxinua neogaeus fathead minnow Pimephales promelas longnose dace Rhinichthys cataraetae creek chub Semotilus atromaculatus 5,)C C'. TABLE B-8 (Continued) FISH SPECIES OF THE SOUTH PLATTE RIVER BASIN Common Name Scientific Name Catostomidae • river carpsucker Ca rpiodes carpio longnose sucher Ca tostomus catostomus white sucker Catostomus commersoni Icta luridae black bullhead Ictalurus melas brown bullhead Ictalurus nebulosus channel catfish Ictalurus punctatus stonecat Noturus flavus Cyprinodontidae plains topminnow Fundulus sciadicus plains killfish Fundulus zebrinus Casterosteidae brook stickleback Culaea inconstans Percichthyidae white bass Morone chrysops striped bass Morose saxatilis • Centrarchidae green sunfish Lepomis cyanellus pumpkinseed Lepomis g_ibbosus orangespotted sunfish Lepomis humilis bluegill Lepomis macrochirus smallmouth bass Micropterus dolomieui • largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides white crappie Pomoxis annularis black crappie Pomoxis nigromaculatus Percidae Iona darter Etheostoma exile Johnny darter Etheostoma nigrum yellow perch Peres flavescens ' walleye Stizostedion vitreum Sciaenidae C freshwater drum Aplodinotus grunniens • Appendix C • ^ ,�tIy c/ I� f 4 1 �•• ti� • APPENDIX C WASTEWATER TREATKENT PLANT LOADINGS 1982-1986 • 50w^. c,,C. LOMP OC COLORADO SOLIDS M ANAGEE)IT STUDY BLACK S VEATCH PROJECT NEMER 13803.120 MARCH 20,1987 Haim AVERAGE BOO LOADINGS 1982 • AVERAGE INFLUENT EFFLUENT BOD BOD INFLUENT INFum MONTH FLOW BOO BOO REMOVED REMOVED BCD BOD (mgd) (tons/day) (tons/day) (tons/day) (RKtwtt) (lbs/mg) RATIO (mo/yr) JAN WAY 5.62 5.41 1.08 4.34 80.1 1,926.5 1.10 FEBRUARY 5.4C 4.81 0.70 4.11 85.4 1,781.5 1.02 ?ARCA 5.39 5.60 0.68 4.92 87.9 2,076.6 1.19 APRIL 5.40 5.38 0.54 4.84 90.0 1,993.3 • 1.14 NAY 6.69 5.16 0.73 4.41 85.4 1,542.9 0.88 JIVE 7.02 6.12 1.02 5.10 83.3 1,743.0 1.00 JURY 7.59 7.37 0.75 6.62 89.8 1,943.2 1.11 AUGUST 7.84 5.39 0.79 4.61 85.4 1,376.1 0.79 SEAMIER 7.40 5.28 0.71 4.57 86.5 1,426.1 0.82 OCT00ER 6.88 5.14 0.51 4.63 90.1 1,492.9 0.85 NOVEMBER 5.90. 5.56 0.59 4.97 69.4 1,884.9 1.08 DECEMBER 5.31 4.75 0.65 4.10 86.3 1,789.6 1.02 • AVERAGE 6.37 5.30 0.73 4.77 86.6 1,748.1 1.00 0s ''. .� LON(IENF COLORADO SOLIDS MANAGEMENT STUDY BLAB( 6 VEATCH PROJECT POSER 13803.120 MARCH 20,1987 ?ENTRY AVERAGE TSS LOADINGS 1982 ® AVERAGE Niue( EFFLUENT TSS TSS INFLLENT INFLUENT MONTH FLDA TSS TSS UNWED REHM TSS TSS (mgd) (tons/day) (tons/day) (tons/day) (percent) (Ibs/m9) RATIO (mo/yr) JANUARY 5.62 3.96 0.87• 3.09 78.1 1,409.4 1.02 FEBRUARY 5.40 5.70 0.65 5.05 88.6 2,111.1 1.53 MARCH 5.39 3.73 0.68 3.06 81.9 1,384.0 1.00 APRIL 5.40 4.01 0.65 3.36 83.7 1,484.4 1.07 MY 6.69 4.45 0.80 3.65 82.0 1,330.3 0.% DINE 7.02 4.54 0.70 3.84 84.6 1,292.0 0.93 JULY 7.59 3.93 0.65 3.28 83.4 1,034.3 0.75 AUGUST 7.84 4.48 0.92 3.57 79.6 1,142.9 0.83 SEPTIMER 7.40 5.10 0.87 4.24 83.0 1,378.4 1.00 OCTOBER 6.88 4.15 0.75 3.40 81.9 1,206.4 0.87 NOUNS 5.90 3.74 0.70 3.04 81.3 1,266.1 0.92 DECENER 5.31 4.15 0.60 3.55 85.5 1,563.1 1.13 • AVERAGE 6.37 4.33 0.74 3.59 82.8 1,383.5 1.00 C'C�ral" UNGMCNT COLORADO SOLIDS MANAGEMENT STUDY BLACK b VEATCH PROJECT NIN ER 13803.120 MARCH 20,1987 MNTHLY AVERAGE 80D LOADINGS 1983 • AVERAGE INFLUENT EFFLUENT 800 BOD INFLUENT mum MONTH FLCN 806 BOO REMOVED MOM ES BO) (mgd) (tons/day) (tons/day) (tons/dr/) (Wert) (lbs/og) RATIO (so/yr) JANUARY 3.40 6.01 0.74 5.27 87.6 2,226.9 1.29 FEBRUARY 5.29 5.36 0.62 4.94 88.9 2,101.7 1.22 MARCH 7.25 6.68 0.76 5.91 ::.6 1,841.5 1.07 APRIL 7.28 6.28 0.82 5.46 87.0 1,726.4 1.00 ' MAY 8.58 8.19 1.04 7.16 87.3 1,909.9 1.11 JINE 8.69 8.00 1.08 6.91 86.4 1,840.2 1.07 JULY 9.37 7.70 1.33 6.37 82.7 1,643.0 0.95 AUGUST 9.21 7.18 0.96 6.22 86.6 1,559.6 0.91 SEPTEMBER 8.72 6.18 0.98 5.20 84.1 1,417.8 0.82 OCTOBER 7.86 5.51 0.82 4.69 55.1 1,401.1 0.81 NOJE BER 7.85 5.76 ' 0.82 4.94 85.8 1,467.9 0.05 DECEMBER 7.95 6.13 1.19 4.94 80.5 1,342.9 0.90 • AVERAGE 7.79 6.60 0.93 5.67 83.9 1,723.2 1.00 P, CC CS-1/4.1 LCIGMONT COLORADO SOLIDS MANAGEMENT STUDY BLACK S VEATCH PROJECT WIER 13803.120 MARCH 20,1987 MINT LY AVERAGE TSS LOADINGS 1983 • AVERAGE INFLUENT EFFLUENT TSS TSS INFLUENT mart MWiN FLCS1 TSS TSS REMOVED MIXED TSS TSS (eld) (tons/day) (tons/day) (tons/day) (percent) (1Ds/o9) RATIO (no/yr) JANUARY 5.40 5.02 0.59 4.44 ' 88.4 1,839.8 1.38 FEBRUARY 5.29 4.15 0.57 3.57 86.2 1,567.9 1.16 MARCH 7.25 5.06 0.85 4.21 83.1 1,395.9 1.04 APRIL 7.28 4.86 0.76 4.10 84.4 1,334.3 i 0.99 MAY 8.58 5.33 0.93 4.40 82.6 1,242.7 0.92 JLNE 8.69 6.13 0.78 5.34 87.2 1,410.2 1.05 JULY 9.37 6.10 0.90 5.20 85.3 1,301.1 0.97 AUGUST 9.21 6.45 0.96 5.49 85.1 1,401.1 1.04 SEPTEMBER 8.72 5.16 0.98 4.18 81.0 1,184.3 0.88 OCTOBER 7.86 4.69 0.92 3.77 80.4 1,192.6 0.89 NOVEMBER 7.85 4.32 0.92 3.40 78.8 1,100.9 0.82 DECEMBER 7.95 4.67 1.13 3.55 75.9 1,176.0 0.87 • AVERAGE 7.79 5.16 0.86 4.30 83.2 1,347.2 1.00 w, ccs��.. ti LOiOM04T COLORADO SOLIDS M4NA6EMENT STUDY BLACK S VEATCH PROJECT MEMBER 13803.120 MARCH 20,1987 M04THLY AVERAGE BCD LOADINGS 1984 • AVERAGE INFLUENT EFFLUENT 800 SOD INFLUENT DELUENT MOTH FL34 SOD BOD RIMED MOOED OJED BOO BCD (mid) (tons/day) (tons/day) (tons/day) (Rartant) (ibs/si) RATIO (ss/yr) JANUARY 6.86 5.92 0.89 5.03 85.0 1,723.9 1.18 FEBRUARY 6.31 5.38 0.68 4.70 87.4 1,705.2 1.17 MARCH 6.12 5.22 0.64 4.58 87.8 1,705.2 1.17 APRIL 6.79 5.88 0.78 5.10 86.8 1,732.0 1.19 MAY 6.96 5.30 0.73 4.57 86.1 1,523.3 1.05 DINE 7.28 4.80 0.71 4.09 85.2 1,319.5 0.91 JULY 8.71 5.48 0.77 4.72 86.0 1,258.7 0.86 AUGUST 9.13 5.41 0.94 4.47 82.6 1,184.7 0.81 SEPTEMBER 8.33 4.67 0.79 3.88 83.1 1,121.0 0.77 OCT08ER 8.41 5.05 0.78 4.27 84.7 1,200.8 0.82 N0.09MBER 7.20 5.34 0.81 4.53 84.8 1,483.3 1.02 DECEMBER 6.67 5.05 0.69 4.38 86.4 1,518.4 1.04 • AVERAGE 7.40 5.29 0.77 4.53 85.5 1,456.5 1.00 P.00:?a !AMC COLORADO SOLIDS 14FNAGVINT STUDY MAC( 4 VEATCH PROJECT rANBER 13803.120 PARCH 20,1987 MCN HLY AVERAGE TSS LOADINGS 1984 • AVERAGE INFLUENT EFFLUENT TSS TSS NUM INR.IINT MINIH VIM TSS TSS REMOVED REMOVED TSS TSS (ogd) (tons/dr) (tons/day) (tons/day) (profit) (11x/m9) RATIO (mo/yr) JANUARY 6.86 4.47 0.89 3.58 80.0 1,304.2 1.14 FEBRUARY 6.31 4.38 0.74 3.64 83.2 1,387.3 1.21 MARCH 6.12 3.45 0.66 2.79 80.8 1,128.9 0.99 APRIL 6.79 3.86 0.81 3.05 79.1 1,136.5 0.99 FAY 6.96 3.94 0.70 3.24 82.3 1,132.2 0.99 JUNE 7.28 3.71 0.77 2.94 79.3 1,017.9 0.89 JULY 8.71 4.42 0.78 3.64 82.4 1,015.6 0.89 AUGUST 9.13 4.64 0.99 3.66 78.8 1,016.8 0.89 SEPTEMBER 8.33 3.92 0.82 3.11 79.2 941.5 0.82 OCTOBER 8.41 4.90 0.91 3.98 81.4 1,164.7 1.02 NOVEMBER 7.20 4.29 0.84 3.45 80.5 1,192.2 1.04 DECEMBER 6.67 4.28 0.77 3.51 82.1 1,283.2 1.12 • AVERAGE 7.40 4.19 0.81 3.38 80.7 1,143.4 1.00 c)OR?A LONGMONT COLORADO SOLIDS MANaltENT STUDY ELAM S VEATCH PROJECT NUMBER 13803.120 MARCH 20,1987 way AVERAGE BCD LOADINGS 1985 • AVERAGE INFLUENT EFR AINT 80D 80D DELUDE INFLUENT WW1 FLOW Boo BOD REPSO S REMOVED BCD BO) (m9d) (tons/day) (tons/day) (tons/day) (pewit) (lbs/mg) RATIO (mo/yr) JANUARY 6.25 4.90 0.63 4.27 87.1 1,569.3 1.06 FEBRUARY 6.15 5.21 0.63 4.57 87.8 1,693.3 1.14 MARCH 6.17 5.30 0.68 4.62 87.2 1,719.4 1.16 APRIL 6.55 5.09 0.83 4.27 83.8 1,535.3 1.05 MAY 7.34 5.32 1.18 4.14 77.7 1,449.2 0.98 JOE 7.90 5.13 0.83 4.30 83.8 1,297.8 0.88 JULY 8.97 6.05 0.98 5.07 83.8 1,348.5 0.91 AUGUST 9.99 6.94 1.50 5.44 78.4 1,389.2 0.94 SEPTEMBER 7.71 5.13 0.96 4.18 81.3 1,331.9 0.90 OCTOBER 8.31 4.83 0.76 4.07 84.3 1,163.3 0.79 NOV07BER 6.95 5.35 0.73 4.62 86.3 1,339.6 1.04 DECEMBER 6.17 5.23 0.63 4.60 88.0 1,693.7 1.14 • AvEPAGE 7.37 5.37 0.86 4.51 84.1 3,479.2 1.00 n` crzz n LONGMONT COLORADO SOLIDS MANAMID4T STUDY BLACK 6 VEATCB PROJECT NUMBER 13803.120 MIDI 20,1987 MENTNLY AVERAGE TSS LOAOINBS 1985 • AVERAGE INFLUENT EFFLUENT TSS TSS INFLUEM INFLUENT MITA FUN TSS TSS RIMED 1913.10) TSS TSS (29d) (tons/day) (tons/day) (tons/day) (percent) (lbs/m9) RATIO (mayr) JANUARY 6.25 3.84 0.74 3.09 80.6 1,227.2 1.02 FEBRUARY 6.15 3.94 0.71 3.23 82.0 1,282.1 1.06 N4RCH 6.17 4.08 0.76 3.32 81.3 1,322.9 1.10 APRIL 6.55 4.46 0.75 3.71 83.2 1,362.1 1.13 MAY 7.34 4.76 0.81 3.96 83.0 1,298.1 1.08 ME 7.90 4.40 0.85 3.55 80.8 1,112.9 0.92 JULY 8.97 4.83 0.88 3.95 81.8 1,076.4 0.89 AUGUST 9.99 5.50 0.91 4.58 83.4 1,100.3 0.91 SFPTEESER 7.71 4.23 0.80 3.44 81.2 1,097.9 0.91 OCTOBER 8.31 4.60 0.94 3.66 79.6 1,107.8 0.92 NOVFNBER 6.95 4.37 0.84 3.53 80.8 1,256.5 1.04 DECEMBER 6.17 3.83 0.77 3.06 79.8 1,242.3 1.03 • AVERAGE 7.37 4.40 0.81 3.59 81.5 1,207.2 1.00 �T0,?a, LNHG'ICtif CIORADO SOLIDS MANAGENENT STUDY BLACK 6 VEATCH PROJECT NUMBER 13803.120 MARCH 20,1987 MONTHLY AVERAGE GOD LOADINGS 1986 • AVERAGE INFLUENT EFFLUENT 800 BOD I ELONf INFLUENT ?MTH FUN BOO BOO REMOVED REMOVED BOO CCD (ogd) (tons/day) (tons/day) (tons/day) (percent) (lbs/og) RATIO (oo/yr) . MARY 6.17 4.95 0.52 4.43 89.5 1,604.5 1.11 FEBRUARY 5.86 3.17 0.50 4.66 90.2 1,762.6 1.22 NARCH 5.69 4.26 0.39 3.86 90.7 1,495.5 1.04 APRIL 7.33 4.84 0.62 4.21 87.1 1,320.0 0.92 NAY 7.35 4.98 0.52 4.46 89.5 1,355.3 0.94 JUNE 7.56 4.56 0.53 4.03 88.4 1,206.1 0.84 JULY 8.61 3.58 0.53 3.05 85.3 831.2 0.58 AUGUST 8.79 5.25 1.00 4.25 80.9 1,194.6 0.83 SEPTEMBER 8.73 5.89 1.11 4.77 81.1 1,349.0 0.94 OCTOBER 8.18 7.33 1.06 6.47 85.9 1,841.8 1.28 WINER 8.45 6.38 0.84 5.53 86.8 1,509.8 1.05 DECEMBER 7.78 7.09 0.68 6.41 90.4 1,824.2 1.27 0 OSAGE 7.54 5.37 0.69 4.68 87.2 1,441.2 1.00 G�(',L'^X7/4, L0 EISINT COLORADO SOLIDS I MAEMENT STUDY BLACK b VEATCB PROJECT WISER 13803.120 MARCH 20,1987 DRILY AVERAGE TSS LOADINGS 1986 e AVERAGE INFLUENT EFFWENT TSS TSS INFLUENT INFLUENT MGM FLEW TSS TSS REMOVED RB1OUED TSS TSS (m9d) (tons/day) (tons/day) (tons/day) (percent) (lbs/m9) RATIO (mo/yr) JAIAMRY 6.17 3.93 0.69 3.23 82.3 1,273.3 1.13 FEBRUARY 5.86 3.66 0.70 2.96 80.9 1,248.5 1.13 MVO 5.69 3.67 0.59 3.08 84.0 1,288.2 1.16 APRIL 7.33 4.98 0.67 4.31 86.5 1,358.3 1.23 MAY 7.35 4.16 0.34 3.82 91.9 1,131.8 1.02 J@E 7.56 3.97 0.27 3.70 93.2 1,049.6 0.95 JULY 8.61 4.38 0.35 4.02 91.9 1,016.3 0.92 AUGUST 8.79 3.90 0.31 3.60 92.1 888.2 0.80 SEPTEMBER 8.73 3.84 0.29 3.55 92.4 881.1 0.80 OCTOBER 8.18 4.48 0.38 4.10 91.5 1,096.9 0.99 WISER 8.45 4.34 0.38 3.96 91.2 1,028.5 0.93 DECEMBER 7.78 3.93 0.30 3.63 92.3 1,011.3 0.91 • AVERAGE 7.51 4.10 0.44 3.66 89.2 1,106.0 1.00 `'COCZ1 • Appendix D • - • APPENDIX D LAND APPLICATION LAND AREA REQUIREMENT'S • CALCU.ATIW OF SLUDGE LOADING RATES BASED ON 1/2 IRRIGATED IRFAT NITROGEN REAUIRDENTS (70 bu/ac) L0NU11ONT COLORADO APRIL 28,1987 * STEP 1 - DEFINITION OF TERMS No • Available Organic Nitrogen (lb/dt) NN3 = Available Amonia Nitrogen (lb/dt) • NO3 ■ Available Nitrate Nitrogen (lb/dt) N •Total Available Nitrogen (lb/dt) RN • Residual Nitrogen (lb/ac) AR • Application Rate of Sludge (dt/ac) Cd • Cadmiun Concentration in the Sludge (mg/kg) Pb • Lead Concentration in the Sludge (mg/kg) Zn • Zinc Concentration in the Sludge (mg/kg) Cu • Copper Concentration in the Sludge Ong/kg) Ni • Nickel Concentration in the Sludge (mg/kg) * STEP 2 - INPUT DATA Organic N Concentration ■ 32,300 mg/kg Ammonia N Concentration • 40,300 mg/kg Nitrate N Concentration • 100 mg/kg Volatilization Factor • 1.0 Denitrification Factor = 0.6 Crop N Requiremant • 160 lb/ac Sludge Cd Concentration • 11.0 mg/kg Sludge pb Concentration + 180.0 mg/kg Sludge Zn Concentration • 900.0 mg/k9 Sludge Cu Concentration = 625.0 mg/kg Sludge Ni Concentration • 30.0 mg/kg Maximum Annual Cd Conc. • 0.25 lb/ar./yr Maximus Cumulative Cd Conc. = 5.0 lb/ac Maximum Cumulative Pb Conc. • 500 lb/ac Maximum Cumulative Zo Conc. = 250 lb/ac Maximum Cumulative Cu Conc. = 123 lb/ac Maximum Cumulative Ni Conc. = 50 lb/ac Daily Sludge Production • 8.5 dt/day * STEP 3 - CALCULATE TOTAL AVAILABLE NITROS24 No • 13.0 lb/dt NH3 = 80.6 lb/dt ® NO3 ■ 0.2 lb/dt N ■ 36.3 lb/dt 4 Available Nitrogen has been calculated by totaling No, NH3, and NO3 and multiplying by the Deeitrification factor * STEP 4 - CALCULATE APPLICATION PATE% Year 1 AR • 2.8 dt/ac Year 2 AR • 2.6 dt/ac Year 3 AR ■ 2.5 dt/ac Year 4 AR = 2.4 dtlac Year 5 AR ■ 2.4 dt/ac f'.4-65:‘211 4 Calculated rates differ from year to year due to varying rates of organic nitrogen mineralization. CALCULATION OF SLUDGE LOADING RATES BASED CN 2/2 IRRIGATED UIST NITROGEN REOUIRETEMS (70 bu/ac) wear COLORADO APRIL 28,1987 • * STEP S - CALCULATE SITE LIFE AND/OR LIMITING APPLICATION RATE Maximum Maxim Sludge Metals Cumulative Annual Site Conc. Loading) Metals! Metals Life Element (lb/dt) (lb/ac/yr) (1b/ac)(1b/ac/yr) (yrs) Cd 0.02 0.1 5.0 0.23 80 Pb 0.36 1.0 SOO - 489 In 1.80 5.1 230 - 49 Cu 1.23 3.6 123 - 33 Ni 0.10 0.3 50 - 176 0 Dependent on CEC value. Obtain values from EPA Process Design Manual, Land Application of Municipal Sludge, EPA-621/1-83-016 4 Based on the sludge application rate calculated for the first year * STEP 6 - CALCULATE AREA REOUIRETENTS AREA ■ (SLUDGE CRYNTITY(DTPD) * 365 CMS/YEAR] / APPLICATION RATE AREA ■ 1,286 acres • re -?e • CALCULATIDN OF SLUM LOADING RATES BASED 0+ 1/2 BARLEY NITROGEN REQUIREMENTS (90 bu/ac) 111401(14T COLORADO APRIL 28,1987 * STEP 1 - DEFINITION OF TERMS No = Available Organic Nitrogen (lb/dt) NH3 • Available Ammonia Nitrogen (lb/dt) • NO3 • Available Nitrate Nitrogen (1b/dt) N = Total Available Nitrogen (lb/dt) RN • Residual Nitrogen (lb/at) AR = Application Rate of Sludge (dt/ac) Cd • CaQaiun Concentration in the Sludge (mg/kg) Pb • Lead Concentration in the Sludge (mg/kg) Zn • Zinc Concentration in the Sludge (mg/kg) Cu • Copper Concentration in the Sludge (mg/kg) Ni • Nickel Concentration in the Sludge (mg/kg) * STEP 2 - INPUT DATA Organic N Concentration • 32,500 209 Ammonia N Concentration • 40,300 mg/kg Nitrate N Concentration • 100 mg/kg Volatilization.Factor = 1.0 Denitrification Factor • 0.6 Crop N Requirement • 140 lb/ac Sludge Cd Concentration = 11.0 mg/kg Slucp Pb Concentration • 180.0 mg/kg Sludge Zn Concentration • 900.0 mg/kg Sludge Cu Concentration ■ 623.0 m4/kg Sludge Ni Concentration ■ 50.0 mg/kg Maximum Annual Cd Conc. • 0.25 lb/ac/yr Maxima Cumulative Cd Conc. • 5.0 lb/ac Maxim Cumulative Pb Conc. • 500 Da/ac. Maximum Cumulative ZO Conc. = 230 lb/ac Maximum Cumulative Cu Conc. • 125 lb/ac Maximum Cumulative Ni Conc. • 50 Ib/ac Daily Sludge Production ■ 8.5 dt/day * STEP 3 - CALCIAATE TOTAL AVAILABLE NITROGEN No • 13.0 lb/dt NH3 • 80.6 lb/dt . NO3 • 0.2 lb/dt N • 36.3 lb/dt 0 Available Nitrogen hat been calculated by totaling No, NI3, and NO3 and multiplying by the Denitrification factor * STEP 4 - CALCULATE APPLICATIQI RATE% Year 1 AR 2.5 dt/ac Year 2 AR • 2.3 dt/ac Year 3 AR • 2.2 dt/ac Year 4 AR • 2.1 dt/ac Year 5 AR • 2.1 dt/ac -% kt••t7t • Calculated rates differ from year to year due to varying rates of organic nitrogen mineralization. CALCULATION OF SLUDGE LOADING RATES BASED 04 2/2 BARLEY NITROGEN REOUIREMTS (90 ba/ac) LON9494T COLORADO APRIL 28,1987 • * STEP S - CALCULATE SITE LIFE AND/OR LIMITING APPLICATION RATE Maximum Mazimis Sludge Metals Cumulative Annual Site Conc. Loading, Metals! Metals Lift Element (lb/dt) (lb/at/yr) (16/ac)(1b/ac/yr) (yrs) cd 0.02 0.1 5.0 0.23 91 Pb 0.36 0.9 500 - 378 Zn 1.80 4.3 230 - 56 Cu 1.25 3.1 125 - 40 Ni 0.10 0.2 SO - 201 ! Dependent on CEC value. Obtain values from EPA Process Design Manual, Land Application of Municipal Sludge, EPA-625/1-83-016 ! Based on the sludge application rate calculated for the first year * STEP 6 - CALCULATE AREA REOUIRDSCS AREA • (SLUDGE OUANTITY(DTPD) * 369 DAYS/YFARI / APPLICATION RATE AREA • 1,470 acres ��t •�v?ti CALCULATION OF SLIME LOADING PATES BASED UN 1/2 DRY UM WHEAT NITROGEN REQUIREMENTS (25 bidet) LONCKNT COLORADO APRIL 28,1987 * STEP 1 - DEFINITION OF TERMS No • Available Organic Nitrogen (lb/dt) NN3 • Available Ammonia Nitrogen (lb/dt) • N03 • Available Nitrate Nitrogen (lb/dt) N • Total Available Nitrogen (10/dt) RN • Residual Nitrogen (lb/ac) AR • Application Rate of Sludge (dt/ac) Cd • Cadeiun Concentration in the Sludge (mg/kg) Pb = Lead Concentration in the Sludge (mg/kg) Zn • Zinc Concentration in the Sludge (mg/kg) Cu • Copper Concentration in the Sludge (mg/kg) Ni • Nickel Concentration in the Sludge (mg/kg) * STEP 2 - INPUT DATA Organic N Concentration • 32,500 mg/kg Amnia N Concentration • 40,300 eg/kg Nitrate N Concentration ■ 100 mg/kg Volatilization Factor = 1.0 Denitrification Factor ■ 0.6 Crop N Requirement • 6O lb/ac Sludge Cd Concentration • 11.0 mg/kg Sludge Pb Concentration ■ 180.0 mg/kg Sludge Zn Concentration • 900.0 mg/kg Sludge Cu Concentration • 525.0 mg/kg Sludge Ni Concentration = 50.0 mg/kg Maximum Annual Cd Conc. • 0.25 lb/ac/yr Maximum Cumulative Cd Conc. • 5.0 lb/ac Maximum Cumulative Pb Cant:. • SOO lb/ac Maximum Cumulative Zn Conc. ■ 250 lb/ac Maximum Cumulative Cu Conc. • 125 lb/ac Maximum Cumulative Ni Conc. • 50 lb/ac Daily Sludge Production • 8.5 dt/day * STEP 3 — CALCULATE TOTAL AVAILABLE NITROGEN No • 13.0 lb/dt NM3 a 80.6 lb/dt • NO3 • 0.2 lb/dt N • 56.3 lb/dt * Available Nitrogen has been calculated by totaling No, NM, and NO3 and multiplying by the Denitrification factor * STEP 4 - CALCULATE APPLICATION RATES, Year 1 AR = 1.1 dt/ac Year 2 AR • 1.0 &he Year 3 AR = 0.9 dt/ac Year 4 AR = 0.9 Wee ,-, Year 5 AR = 0.9 dt/ac `'e'_' "'. '- • Calculated rates differ from year to year due to varying rates of organic nitrogen mineralization. CALCULATION OF SLUDGE LOADING PATES BASED IN 2/2 DRY LAND WHAT NITROGEN REOUIREIENTS (25 bu/ac) LONDICNT COLORADO APRIL 28,1987 ® * STEP 5 - CALCULATE SITE LIFE AND/OR LIMITING APPLICATION RATE Maximum Maximo Sludge Metals Cumulative Annual Site Conc. Loading* Metals. Metals Life Element (lb/dt) (lb/ac/yr) (lb/ac)(lb/ac/yr) (yrs) Cd 0.02 0.0 5.D 0.25 213 Pb 0.36 0.4 500 - 1303 2n 1.80 1.9 250 - 130 Cu 1.25 1.3 125 94 Ni 0.10 0.1 50 - 469 . Dependent on CEC value. Obtain values from ERA Process Design Manual, Land Application of Municipal Sludge, EP44;5/1-83-016 4 Based on the sludge application rate calculated for the first year * STEP 6 - CALCULATE AREA REQUIREMENTS AREA • (SLUDGE QIIPmfITY(DTPD) * 365 OAYS/YEARI / APPLICATION RATE AREA • 3,430 acres • ^S`3.`.7 CALCULATION CF SLUDGE LOADING PATES BASED CN 1/2 CORN NITROGEN REOUIREM Nis GRAIN CORN (140 bu/ac) LONOIONT COLORADO APRIL 28,1987 * STEP 1 - DEFINITION OF TERMS No • Available Organic Nitrogen (lb/dt) NN3 = Available Ammonia Nitrogen (lb/dt) • NO3 • Available Nitrate Nitrogen (lb/dt) N • Total Available Nitrogen (lb/dt) RN • Residual Nitrogen (lb/ac) AR • Application Rate of Sludge (dt/ac) Cd • Cadmiun'Concentration in the Sludge (mg/kg) Pb = Lead Concentration in the Sludge (mg/kg) Zn • Zinc Concentration in the Sludge (mg/kg) Cu = Copper Concentration in the Sludge (mg/kg) Ni ■ Nickel Concentrztion in the Sludge (m949) * STEP 2 - INPUT DATA Organic N Concentration = 32,500 mg/kg Ammonia N Concentration • 40,300 mg/kg Nitrate N Concentration = 100 mg/kg. Volatilization Factor • 1.0 Denitrification Factor • 0.6 Crop N Requirement = 170 lb/ac Sludge Cd Concentration = 11.0 mg/kg Sludge Pb Concentration • 180.0 mg/kg Sludge Zn Concentration • 900.0 ag/kg Sludge Cu Concentration • 625.0 mg/kg Sludge Ni Concentration • 50.0 mg/kg Maximum Annual Cd Conc. • 0.25 lb/ac/yr Maximum Cumulative Cd Conc. • 5.0 lb/ac Maximum Cumulative Pb Conc. • 500 lb/ac Maximum Cumulative Zn Conc. • 250 lb/ac Maximum Cumulative Cu Conc. • 125 lb/ac Maximum Cumulative Ni Conc. • 50 lb/ac Daily Sludge Production = 8.5 dt/day * STEP 3 - CALCULATE TOTAL AVAILABLE NITROGEN No = 13.0 lb/dt NH3 • 80.6 lb/dt • NO3 • 0.2 lb/dt N • 56.3 lb/dt N! Available Nitrogen has been calculated by totaling No, NH3, and NO3 and multiplying by the Denitrification factor * STEP 4 - CALCULATE APPLICATION RATES* Year 1 AR • 3.0 dt/ac Year 2 AR • 2.7 dt/ac Year 3 AR • 2.6 dt/ac Year 4 AR • 2.6 ddac Year 5 AR • 2.6 dt/ac •- (..10::*%761 e' • Calculated rates differ from year to year doe to varying rates of organic nitrogen mineralization. • CALCULATION OF SLUDGE LOADING RATES BASED ON 2/2 CORN NITROI,4M1 REQUIREMENTS GRAIN CORN (140 Wee) LQXiW COLORADO APRIL 28,1987 • * STEP 5 - CALCULATE SITE LIFE AND/OR LIMITING APPLICATICN RATE Maximus Maxima Sludge Metals Cumulative Annual Site Conc. Loading. Metals* Metals Life Element (1b/dt) (1b/ac/yr) (lb/ac)(1b/ac/yr) (yrs) Cd 0.02 0.1 5.0 0.25 75 Pb 0.36 1.1 500 - 460 Zrt 1.80 5.4 250 - 46 Cu 1.25 3.8 125 - 33 Ni 0.10 0.3 50 - 166 0 Dependent on CEC value. Obtain values from EPA Process Design Manual, Land Application of Municipal Sludge, EPA-625/1-83-016 0 Based on the sludge application rate calculated for the first year * STEP 6 - CALCIAATE AREA REQUIREMENTS AREA = (SLUDGE OWNTITY(DTPD) * 365 DAYS/YEAR) /APPLICATION RATE AREA = 1,211 acres • nf`ef": 2^ CALCO.ATIO) OF SLUDGE LOADING RATES BASED CN 1/2 CORN NITROGEN RECUIREMENTS SILAGE CORN LO16MOdT COLORADO APRIL 28,1987 * STEP 1 — DEFINITION OF TERMS No • Available Organic Nitrogen (lb/dt) NH3 • Available Ammonia Nitrogen (lb/dt) e NO3 • Available Nitrate Nitrogen (lb/dt) N ■ Total Available Nitrogen (lb/dt) RN • Residual Nitrogen (lb/ac) AR • Application Rate of Sludge (dt/ac) Cd • Cadaiun Concentration in the Sludge (mg/kg) Pb • Lead Concentration in the Sludge (mg/kg) Zn • Zinc Concentration in the Sludge (mg/kg) Cu ■ Copper Concentration in the Sludge (mg/kg) Ni • Nickel Concentration in the Sludge (mg/kg) * STEP 2 - INPUT DATA Organic N Concentration • 32,500 mg/kg Ammonia N Concentration • 40,300 mg/kg Nitrate N Concentration ■ 100 mg/kg Volatilization Factor • 1.0 Denitrification Factor • 0.6 Crop N Requirement • 200 lb/ac Sludge Cd Concentration • 11.0 mg/kg Sludge Pb Concentration • 180.0 mg/kg Sludge Zn Concentration • 900.0 mg/kg Sludge Cu Concentration ■ 625.0 mg/kg Sludge Ni Concentration • 50.0 mg/kg Maximum Annual Cd Canc. • 0.25 lb/ae/yr Maximum Cumulative Cd Conc. • 3.0 lb/at Maxims Cumulative Pb Conc. • 500 lb/ac Maxims Cumulative Zn Conc. • 250 lb/ac Maximum Cumulative Cu Cont. • 125 lb/ac Maximo Cumulation Ni Conc. • 50 16✓ac Daily Sludge Production • • 8.5 dt/day * STEP 3 - CALCULATE TOTAL AVAILABLE NITROGEN No ■ 13.0 lb/dt NN3 • 80.6 lb/dt • NO3 ■ 0.2 lb/dt N ■ 56.3 lb/dt 0 Available Nitrogen has been calculated by totaling No, NH3, and NO3 and multiplying by the Denitrification factor * STEP 4 - CALCULATE APPLICATION RATES. Year 1 AR • 3.6 dt/ac Year 2 AR ■ 3.2 dt/ac Year 3 AR 3.1 dt/ac Year 4 AR • 3.0 dt/ac n`,��,�„ Year 5 AR • 3.0 dt/ac . Calculated rates differ from year to year doe to varying rates of organic nitrogen mineralization. CALCO.ATION OF SLUM LOADING BATES BASED ON 2/2 CORN NITROGEN REQUIREMENTS SILAGE Cpl! LONG1NT COLORADO APRIL 28,1987 ® * STEP S - CALCULATE SITE LIFE AND/OR LIMITING APPLICATION RATE Maximum Maximum Sludge Metals Cumulative Annual Site Conc. Loading. Metals. Metals Life Element (lb/dt) (lb/a/yr) (1b/ac)(1b/ac/yr) (yrs) Cd 0.02 0.1 5.0 0.25 64 Pb 0.36 1.3 SOO - 391 Zn 1.80 6.4 230 - 39 Cu 1.25 4.4 123 - 28 Ni 0.10 0.4 50 - 141 0 Dependent on CEC value. Obtain values from EPA Process Design . Manual, Land Application of Municipal Sludge, EPA-625/1-83-016 i Based on the sludge application rate calculated for the first year * STEP 6 - CALCULATE AREA REQUIREMENTS AREA • (SLUDGE OUNCITY(DTPD) * 365 DAYS/YFARI / APPLICATION RATE AREA 1,029 acres • • Appendix E • • APPENDIX E ALTERNATIVE CAPITAL AND OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE COSTS THE 16 TABLES THAT FOLLOW PRESENT THE CAPITAL COSTS ALONG WITH THE AVERAGE YEARLY OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE COSTS FOR EACH OF THE EIGHT SLUDGE MANAGEMENT ALTERNATIVES DESCRIBED •IN CHAPTER 3. • • 'n lIZZ s-1 CAPITAL COST LJOm APPLIOOTCS Or =OUT= =DON AT A2ICSOIQC PATO 2.4 mar TOTAL sOLILs COntitATton 20atlis HAUL OISTANCi CSI9h0PssATm CAPITAL Corr !1060. hlgestlea SO-.Foot Master plgeater, luag sue S ,00.000 sludge Wading Station Grading and 0rslnsge Zogreveeente, lump nr 20,000 Loading flatten Isproverhts, lump cum 130.000 Paving, 10,000 ag yd at 014/00 yd 140.000 sludge Trasapert/ne]ection s tein nurse Trucks, 7,000 gal each, 6 at $120,000 each 720,000 Application gahloles, 4,000 gal each, 2 at 5143.000 each 2'10.000 POTyOAL 32,120.000 Centingenelee at 20 Percent 420.000 TO PA Q1iAL Lc/t $2,340,000 • TABLE i-2 • OPOATZCO AND w,urnaa s cons LAM APPLICMCIr Or EGOIST= SL=OE AT?MOM= RAYS= 2.4 PMDCHT TOTAL SOLIDS CONCEMPYGON 20-4CILi WADE Dunn CITE-0PM= REPLACAmer mss Equipment Replacement sludge Transport and injection vehicles Replaced at 10 Years with Ma salvage value None Trucks, 6 st $120,000 each $ 730,000 APplicatled Vehicles, 2 at $145,000 each 290.000 TYPAL RMACEoTT COOT $1,010,000 OMATTON AND MAZNITRANCE CWPs Labor Operators, 9 at $32,400 per year $ 291,600 mechanic, 1 at $12,400 per year 32.400 Supervisor, 1 at $76,400 per year 36.400 TO'DS. LABOR COTS $ 762,400 Pal 22,000 Gal Per Year at $0.64 Per Gal $ 11,100 Maintenance Sludge Transport Vehicles $ 6.000 Sludge Application Whitlows 13,000 Digesters 15 0000, TOTAL PAINTEMIC! CO= $ 36,000 TOTAL OPERATION AND MIETEMOE COSTS $ 432,$00 • ("4'eq?4 TAWS Tr$ • OGIML COST LIO D ATR.IGTIOM or MUST= SLUDGE AT ASBDOCNIC PATS 5.5 PIDmFT THAT. SOLIDS 0,CONIMATICti 20-sa.S MAUL MSTAMa cpII-0.m1MTED CAPITAL 0052 Centrifuge Thickening ae Bar Sludge Thickening Building, 750 .0 ft at 120/.0 ft $ 90,000 Centrifuges, 2 at 4275,000 such 550.000 Polyrr Syntes, lump sun 60,000 Sinop Digestion 50-Foot Diameter Digoetee, lump mum 500.000 Sludgo Loading Station Grading and Drainage Lgrovesents, lump sue 20.000 10adino Station improvements, lump sun 1$0.000 Paving, 10,000 .0 yd at $14/40 yd 140,000 Sludge Tracaport/Inlocties Pencils, Pura Truolla, 7,000 gal each, 4 at $120.000 each 450.000 Application Vehicles, 4,000 gal each, 2 at $145,000 each 290.000 3011017.1. $2,600.000 Contingencies at 20 Percat 520.000 TOTAL CA9ITAT. coy 51.120.000 • f-‘0,re^7n .v • Tk81i 6-4 OPEYdTC I aIID MAIRPIIPBQ cons LAND aPPLIChTIM or DIM= S1000E u amhaeauC Turn Par 3.5 Pa TOW. SOLIDS mmm lATICM • 2o-au NML DIS77LLEa CI1S-0.Il.TID Rin of COSTS Equipment Smpleceseet Sludge Transport and Injection Vesicles Replaced at 10 Year■ with 8p Selvage Value Nurse Trucks, 4 at $120,000 each $ .480.000 Application Vehicles, 2 at $145,000 each 290,000 TODD. EDIMQR1rF CORY $ 770,000 OPER SIgs AID lidYNTE MIC 00STS Laser Operator., a at $32,400 per Year $ 259.200 mechanic, 1 at $12,400 per year - 32.400 Supervisor, 1 at $58,400 per year 38,t00 IV'DhL LABOR WR17 $ 330,000 Fuel 15,200 Oal Per Year at $0.64 Per Gal $ 10,000 Pawn 56,000 kWh at $0.06 Per kWh $ 3,400 Chemicals Polymer, 14.600 lb at $3 per lb $ 43.800 malotehanee Sludge Transport Vehicles $ 4.000 Sludge Application Vehicles 9.000 Digesters 15,000 Centrifuge 13 MO •201,L l91LRl13LMICt COSTS $S0 TOTAL ODQCCr AND lNIIrTnOUMQ COSTS $ 428.200 s �rw,a", • TAILS n-3 ovrlu.COOT IMO AFFLICJAZCO OF 020vrED SLUMS AT adednonIC PATES 2.4 MO NT TOTAL SOLIDS ccOONFSaTIOO COirraACT nabr. uFrrx ODa1' Sludge Digestion 30atot Disaster Digester, lump Gun $ 500,000 Sludge Lading Station Grading and Drainage IegreValleta, iump m 20,000 Loading Station lam a nts, lug sun 130.000 FaVie4, 10.000 aC yd at $14/ag Td 140.000 Sur= $1,110,000 Contingencies at 20 Dement 232• 000 TOTAL d,FZIOS. Cogs $1.112.*** • 9C0824 • TN= 0-4 OM:RCN Aim,91IIR'Ao1pa CORM LAIC APPIZO•PSON Or DICES= 7LJDOt AT mankllttC MATTA 2-4 9G0O2fl TOM SOLLD/ CONCDITDATiat CONl1.CT WADE ODb1ATlos AND IGIIrnaVaCi COSTS Labor Oparatora, 2 at $32,400 per year 9 64,600 Supervisor, 1 at 930,400 par year 75,400 •O724. Wall COSTS $ 103,200 maintenance DiO„Un $ 17,000 Ccotra0t Wain 16,000.000 Gal at $0.0219 ver oat $ 523.000 17ew ODOUS10lr AND 1pIIflppalR CDR= $ 641,200 0 9cCs24 • i UDZ Z-7 CAPITAT. CONT LANZ AriltraTION Or DIMS= STUOOS AS AOAONpCCC RAT= 3.3 Mawr TOTAL 30Crtd OOIIC@ RATIO. CONTRACT NAM CAP2TAL COST Centrifuge Thickening Of Ram Sludge Thickening Building, 770 mg ft at 120/Og ft $ 50.000 Centrifuges, 2 et $273,000 each 570.000 polymer System, lump na 40.000 Sludge Digestion SO-root Diameter Digester, lump sun $ 500,000 Sludge Loading Station grading and Drainage Improvements, lump mum 20.000 Loading Station Improvements, lump mum 150.000 Paving, 10.000 eg yd et 514/sg yd 140,000 SDlIOTAL 31.gO,000 Contingencies at 20 Percent 344,000 TOTAL ORV AL CYST 52,1%.000 • 49CC82, • Tana o-6 RCN Alm iossfrancz COST8 IMO APPLIOT2C4I or OI IZSITO nail AT amopOIC NA= 3.5 PERCENT TWA& SOLIDS COMCCSTRATrel CONTIUCTIuu7L OPEAITON Alm nwurramuNce Cow Labor Operators, 2 at $32,400 par year $ 64,!00 Supervisor, 1 at $26,400 per year 36.400 TOTAL LABOR COSTS $ 103,100 Power 76,000 kit at 00.06 per kWh $ 3.400 Chemicals Polymer, 14,600 lb at $3 Per lb $ 43,600 Maintenance MMgeeters 3 15.000 Centrifuge 13.000 Contract Hamlin 12.400.000 pal at 50.0321 Per Oal $S00 gpnlr• OPERATION Alm Mhini manna COSTS 4 576,400 s 490 824 TaBIi F9 0J172.L COST ApaTED 17ATlC PILE CCMOSITBG OF Rho nu= 5-FOCT PILE mIGST • CAPITAL COST Sludge Dematering Grading and Drainage Imprommmt■, lung sus $ 5,000 Davat•ring Building, 3,000 q ft at $120/p K 360,000 one 2.2ybter melt Press at $220,000, Plus Installation at 20 Percent 264,000 Palmate Existing Belt Filter Press 50,000 Polymer System, lump sus 160,000 Sludge Transport Vehicles • Damp Teaks, 2 at $75,000 each 150,000 Asnted Static Pile Composting Facility Grading and Drainage Improvements, lug sum 36,000 Paving, 31,000 q yd at $14/q yd •36,000 Combating Building. 76,600 q ft at $5.20/sq ft 406,000 aeration Blowers, 6 at $4.200 each 16 ` 33,600 Aeration Piping, lug non 225.000 Future Oder Control System Piping, lump sum 10,000 Electrical and Imstrrvesution Including Lightning Protection. lungs Sus 110.000 Condensate Evaporation Pend, lump ns 60,000 Compost Curing Banding, 13,000 q ft at $5.20/sq met 66,000 Finished CORo■t Storage Building Grading and Drainage improvements, lump sum 5.000 Paving, 700 q yd at $14/ag yd 9.400 Finished Compost Storage Building, 7.000 q met at $5.20/q met 36.000 Composting Equipment Prent-End Loaders. 2 at $150,000 such 300.000 Windrow nixing Monne, 1 at $160,000 160,000 $promL $2,904.400 Contingencies at 20 percent 561.E TOTAL CAPITA. COST $3,405,000 • • 9C 06?n� TAPIR 8-10 OPERATION AND 1P1IIflm01MQ COSTS ARRA= STATIC DILL COMPOSTINI OF RAN SLODOC 5-10OT PILE N6SORT • 1R04@0212 COPTS Equipment Replacement . Sludge Handling Equipment Replaced at 10 Teats with NO Salvage Value Pup Truck., 2 at $75,000 oath $ 150,000 Windrow Mixing Machin, 1 et $160,000 160.000 Front-End Loaders, 2 at 3130,000 each 300,000 TOTAL NCyLJCI,mR COST $ 610.000 OPERATION AND !°SR2e0WN6 oars tabu °potatoes, 5 at 332,400 w year $ 162,000 • 10440.410, 1 at $32,400 pet year 32,600 Supervisor, 1 at $18,600 per year 33.400 TOTAL LAD= COSTS $ 232,500 Furl 7,300 Oat Pre Mar at $0.64 Dar 041 $ 4.700 Power 234000 Ale at $0.06 Pet kWh $ 17,000 Chemicals Polymer, 35,000 lb at $3 pee lb $ 105,000 Nai4temanee Sludge Transport Vehicles $ 4,000 Composting Equipment 0.000 TOTAL NAZ1Rffialar COSTS $ 13.000 TOTAL OPcusora AND NAUrnStANCR COSTS $ 372.300 • 9C06?ft TAILS 1-11 aVITAt COST AMMO STATIC MA Cas osTama of 9Rx Sinn= 12-FOOT PIK' =Mr vlTm afar AMTICO • CAPITAL COST Sludge Dmuatering Grading and Drainage nup tmemente, lump sum $ 5,000 Cantering Building, 3,000 aG ft at $120/eq ft 360,000 One 2.2-Motor Solt Prate at $220,000, Plum Installation at 20 Percent 264,000 Relocate Existing Belt filter Press 33.000 Polymer System, lump sum 160.000 Sludge Transport vahielee Dump Trucks, 2 at $75.000 each 150.000 Aerated Static Pilo Composting facility Grading and Drainage Lprovaments, lump nu 15,000 paving, 31.000 ag yd at $14/sq yd 434.000 Composting builbing, 32,400 og ft at $5.20/eg ft 169,000 Aeration Slower■. 4 at $4•200 each 33,600 Aeration Piping, lump sum 100,000 Future Oder Control System Piping, lump sum 10,000 Ilectrical and Instrumentation InOluding Lightning Protection, lump sum 110,000 Coodemeato Iwperation Pond, lump w 21.000 compost Curing Building, 13,000 mg ft at $5.20/sq ft 66,000 ',seabed compost Senening Grading and Drainage Improvements, lump sum 4,000 Paving. 400 aq yd at $14/eq yd 3,600 Screening Pqutpmant, lump mat 3,000 Finished Compost Storage Building Grading end Drainage leprouuemets, lump sum 5.000 Paving, 1,300 mg yd at $14/eq yd 21.000 Finished Compost Storage Building, 12,000 mi ft at $5.20/sq ft 62,000 Composting WdiDmset front—Ind Loaderm, 2 at $130,000 each 300.000 ® WIDIrov MALI q Machine. 1 at $160,000 160.000 SgQippxL $2,313.200 Contingencies at 20 Percent 503.000 TM= CAPITAL COST $3,016.200 ST.082/1 Yams "-12 OVOATIm am)10.1M110202$ CO= Ann= fah= pIIi COMPOSTEMS Op HAW SLi100i 12-Pone! YIIi CWT oWITH AIESCNISIT MOM= 22PLODIMIT COSTS "wipeout leplaaemant Sludge Handling "shipment Replaced at 10 Years with No salvage Value pug Trucks, 2 at $73,000 each $ 130,000 Windrow Wising Machine, 1 at $160,000 160.000 /rant-Rmd Loaders, 2 at $1'50,000 each 300.000 Screening cavil: ant 3.000 TOTAL sDLaL]OaQi OOmr $ 613,000 OpGMTIOR AMD MaRPII0490t COLA Labor Operators, 6 at $32,400 per year $ 194,400 Mechanic, 1 at $32,400 per year 32,400 Supervisor, 1 et $55,400 per year 35.400 TOTAL IaHOm COSTS $ 265,200 Fuel 7,300 Gal Per Year at $0.64 par Gal $ 4,700 Power 254,000 kWh at $0.06 per ARie $ 17,000 Chemicals Polymer, 33,000 lb at $3 per lb $ 105,000 Ared•ant 4,000 cu yd at $6 per cu yd $ 24.000 Meinteneeee SlhOge Traespert Vehicles $ 4.000 Composting Loplipment 9,000 TOTAL IM71F11201mQ COPTS $ 13,000 oTOOLK.OPRaATIm AND WhafPpHROCt CONY! $ 306,300 i iCea2, TABLE S-11 CAPITA, COGS ASIA=Caw COMPosiII@ OF SAM SLUDGE WITH AMGOWEl=TIC& • CAPITA. COAT Sludge Dewatering Grading and Drainage Improvements, lump sum $ 5,000 Dewatering Building, 1,000 mp ft at $120/eg ft 160,000 Coe 2.2-Meter Belt Prem. at $220,000. Plum Installation at 20 Percent 261,000 Dolocate abasting Dolt filter Drew 50.000 Polymer Teed System, lump sum 160.000 Sludge Transport Vehicles comp Trucks, 2 at $75,000 am& 150,000 Aerated windrow Composting Facility Grading and Drainage l proveaeats, lump ems 10.000 Paving. 22.000 eg yd at $11/mg Yd 291.000 Composting Building, 65,100 p it at $5.20/sq et 110,000 Aeration Blown, 12 at $1,500 each 12.000 Aeration Piping, lump sus 200,000 • Future Oder Control System Piping, lump sum 10,000 Electrical and Instrumentation Including Lightning Protection, lump cum 110,000 Condensate Evaporation Pond, lump w 21,000 Finished Compost/Anendment Storage Building Grading and Drainage Iaprovaests, lump sum 5.000 Paving. 1.500 og yd at $11/sg yd 21,000 Finished Compost Storage Building, 12,000 eg ft at $5.20/eg tt 62,000 Composting Equipment Front-zed leaden, 2 at $150.000 each 100,000 Mixing Auger, 1 at $165,000 165,000 windrow Mixing Machine. 1 at $160,000 160.000 SUWOPEAL $2,769,000 Contingencies at 20 Percent 551.000 TOTAL CAPIDJ. COST $1,121,000 • OCG ZI WM I-14 OPERATION ASO I911111OGtlCL COSTS AERATED SOMEI OW OMWOST3M0 CV SAW SLOWS WTI A!CISlQRT AODIT2OS • K t.o.am3ir COM EquiOment Heplecement Sludge Handling Equipment Paplaced at 10 Years Kin Ha Salvage Value lkmq Trucks, 2 at $73,000 each $ 170,000 Tent-md Loaders, 2 at $170,000 each 300,000 Mixing Auger, 1 at $163,000 263,000 nindrar Mixing Machine, 1 K $160.000 160,000 TOTAL REPIACE10Mar2 COST $ 77!,000 °STYPTICS AND mtmENT SPOCT COTE! Labor Operator., 6 at $32,400 per year $ 129,600 Mechanic, 1 at $32,400 per year 32,400 Super/1mm, 1 at $36.400 per year 35,400 TOTAL lallOIt COSTS $ 200,400 Fuel 6,000 Gal Per Tear at $0,64 Dee dal $ 4,000 Power 266,000 kid at $0.06 pee Mr 9 16,000 Chemicals Polymee, 33,000 lb at $3 per lb $ 100,000 Amendment 10,000 cu yd at $6 Par cu yd $ 60,000 Maintenance Sludge ?rampart Vahiclea $ 4,000 Composting Equipment 9,000 TOTAL M01OQ$OEICE COSTS $ 13,000 • TOTAL OPESATIOS Sum L01Ar2 20aCE COSTS $ 390,400 • WIZ V-15 eaPrta.. CODS a„T-ova SLUMS OXIDATICSI m h VERTICAL TOR[ RLICTOR COITAL COST Vertech lqulpnent ?attach Equipment (from vested) proposal), lump apt $2.912,000 Ash Transport Vehicles Front-Zed Loader, 1 at $150,000 1$0.000 Dump Track, 1 at $75.000 7$•000 SURTO= $3,137,000 Contingencies at 20 Percent 627,000 SOS GPTUD COST $2.766.000 • e CISZA TASLE E-16 OPTIAT109 Alm)9=1214 22 COM Q24-ODENTID SLUDGE OOCaDATSOd IN A • VIITDCAL TOMEMCP* J077ACCSOM! COar7 Equipment Replacement front-Cod weer, 1 at $150,000 4 150,000 Dmy Truck, 1 at $75,000 75,000 TOTAL REPLACKNEWT COST S 225,000 OPG ATIca AND lwariteDis 6 o0sn Labor Operators, 5 at $52,400 per year $ 162,000 Mechanic, 1 at 612,400 Per year 12,400 Supervisor, 1 et 65[,400 per year 36,400 TOLV. LIDOS COSTS 6 232,600 Fuel 1,500 Oal Per Tour et $0.64 Per 0a1 6 1,000 VTR Supplemental Fuel (Vertsch proposal) 4,400 Power 622.000 kle (Verteok proposal) at 60.06 Per IM 6 37,100 chamicals Acid Mask. $7/dry ton (Vertech proposal) 6 20.400 Carlene 651/dry tea (Verteee proposal) 156.000 Landfill of Ash Tipping fees 6 5.500 Maintenance Ash Transport vehicles 6 6.000 vertical Tubs factor and Support Systems, 511/dry ton (Verteeh propeul) 12,100 TOTAL OnSOSTOD AIeD porrC04K; mSt3 6 494,500 SC Cr')• i -.Anse 't • Appendix F 0 scr^7:1 • APPENDIX P PUBLIC PARTICIPATION • Q�Caz APPENDIX P PUBLIC PARTICIPATION This appendix vill review efforts made to solicit and incorporate public comments into the City of Longmont's Solids Management Study. The presentation ofthe public participation aspects of this study vill be • presented in the same chronological order in which they occurred. Organization of this appendix is as follovs: Page Affidavit of Publication F-1 June 29, 1987 Article in the Longmont Times Call F-3 July 1, 1987 Article in the Longmont Times Call F-6 Public Bearing Attendance Record, July 8, 1987 F-7 Public Bearing Minutes, July 8, 1987 F-8 July 9, 1987 Article in the Longmont Times Call F-10 • • 2r , AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION JUL 14 ,S State of Colorado County of Boulder 1 J. R. Hofmann ,do NOME OP•esLIC.eAR1.0 . y swear that the LONGMONT DAILY 1ThIES CALL isor.OP 1 a NOmOrr WASTlwwrls TREATMENT , des fy FACILITIES PLAN City printed,, in whole or in part, and published to SOLID...,MA !LAMT the City of Longmont, cunt of Boulder,State of Colorado,and VAN OM 7��OIMt YaW CIA Y which has general circulation therein and in parts of Boulder and oms• fY ni ,semi 1 se. .1 nv.sum Cyr Caw Weld Cantles; that said newspaper has been continuously and O al MI wATTAINNOC Metre ti��LrlRunes eW,O uninterruptedly published for a period of more than six months ��ins «n,ow as o cons trees next prior to the first publication of the annexed legal notice of • na Peeress wee ere rieMb is le co- e.vr ark mess.r climma/eM Er MEM advertisement, that said newspaper has been admitted to the w.. Tea•�PMA�� United States mails as second-class matter under the provisions MM.wMMennnMows..ineMlle• . Nom me w`M.Y.ag Seer at sees Sal of the Act of March 3, 1879,or any amendments thereof,and that �'•eM „M sr rr InimMant . ta. said newspaper is a daily newspaper duly qualified for OM.M M M•SMr MY.e.Y,ll PIE.wM Y WON&Sal IV a«ea per e..P«.M publishing legal notices and advertisements within the meaning TIN MwoY.11r VillPim IkliCOMWOOllirarieffirSIIIV' • E of the laws of the State of Colorado;that copses of each numbs of .Mle.r.IMINE OM..eg.SMNISC MIMES q Med e.Yaese Mari g,}o Mew tees..r said newspaper, in which said notice of advertisement was Iweaam m Mira. . SIB Mao eelMMelM.eee MIR NW p , published, were transmitted by mail at carder to each of the I.r.eeelMeMc.a.Y amil .lrlw vier.. Ibis WINN MelICME.CIITM lagoon Unto . subscribers of said newspaper, according to the accustomed Celt. lt.I M FE•W�w �'a C mode of business in this office. wM.Draws a.rg,Y.MM w rkin• a's O . A.M.Is rAU.O.MoNa• s•IR YO.. MARIMM Is Pr 1TM CNN M CM.AmMIN . That the annexed legal notice or advertimanent was published Oa AS ffi the regular and entire editions of said daily newspapenrsme moxbaroderoofkoczotheadmaticxactuoaceek for the period of 4 ooneeeutive insertions; and that the fiat publication of said notice was in the issue of said newspaper dated June S , 19 8,7rnd that the last publication of said notice was in the issue of said newspaper dated June 26 19 87 . 7,00 General Mariner gfraribed and sworn to before me this 26th June ,10 87 of. ._'.� . / mousy Pubs, . .aTANF Mrs Me • 717 4th k ens FEES 58 9Q ^usracfi 021Catla gle0! L9CCoSi�1 F-1 • a 1 111: 1JA t s_1 . Phones Times-Coll Publishing CD- 303m6.2241 Post Office Box 299 Invoice Metro 717 Fourth Avenue&Terry Street N O. C 14675 .u43636 Longmont. Colored° 80501 TO .City of Longmont DATE6-11-87 Civic Center P.O. X02 2 Longmont, Co. 80501 Alice Ramon • DATE DESC iPriON PRICE AMOUNT s June 5, 12,19,26, 1987 Hearing Wastewater Treatment 38 lines x 1 column 1st insertion .50 19.00 2nd,3r,4th insertions .35ea 39.90 58.90 ReQuired effidovits for keel odvenienq will be moiled otter the lost doy of pubRostien. exartetz yo0_O0._inaciao :. • i vi.oL7za F-2 Of•, ;• irrsa I iiAi`). i s ;viol .. ... . -- i� 1ail �s • ' q b. ..i ,$ i. . _ _i !Ming• . :AI R1 • .: ; ..; ! Ali ill di rg =iMil all 11 ' • ! a i , ai t . .# ,Cr "a litho „i tripitp Ifni , c.ioili ,.tirt ttfx . 1 %IP 1 $111 hal1 60 gig titil ILA jets pule (irillt so t � ` m �ill � li in , rt ru lifrini ,f , . C. as alikiiif ih Si • -se; 'a �s 1q I 4ma :m ga Miffj 1111-1 iii iii i� j G � 77111E _ i1 Fret; 21 lel a 1a 'to 1 old a 0 ri °5:1'top 113134$ --C��z^: F-3 CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION June 30, 1981 The Water Quality Division and Black and Veatch Engineers have completed a study of treatment and disposal options for waste S sludge produced by the City's wastewater treatment plant. This study , known as the "Solids Management Plan," completes the planning work needed to proceed with the final portion of the current wastewater plant expansion. The original planning study ( facilities plan) for the wastewater plant, which was completed in 1982, did not address long-term options for sludge disposal. The major reason for this was the construction of the Vertical Tube Reactor (VTR) process in 1982. VTR was developed as a joint project between Vertec Inc. , the Environmental Protection Agency and the City. Since this process was experimental and innovative, actual operational experience was needed so that it could be compared with other sludge treatment options. Since that time, an evaluation of the VTR process has been completed. However, since VTR was only operational for a short period of time in 1984 and 1985 the primary method of solids handling during the last five years has been digestion of sludge followed by disposal on agricultural land. A long-term land disposal program was not developed because of the lack of comparison with other alternatives. The Solids Management Plan provides such a comparison. City engineering and operations staff, in conjunction with Black and Veatch and representatives of the University of Colorado, initially developed a list of all conceivable treatment and disposal options. After a thorough screening of these options, City staff decided which were appropriate to the City's situation and these were designated for further study. The Solids Management Plan contains an evaluation of these sludge treatment and disposal methods which examines their cost-effectiveness, reliability, long-term applicability and environmental impact. The attached "Summary of Findings and Recommendations" includes a discussion of the alternatives and a brief discussion of the evaluation process used in the Solids Management Plan. The evaluated alternatives include VTR, composting and land disposal , • all of which the City has had experience yith over the last five years. VTR, although low in environmental impacts, proved to be the most costly and least reliable process. Land application of digested sludge was the least costly alternative, but its applicability over the long term was judged to be questionable because of the changing nature of state and federal regulations. Composting of the sludge with disposal of the composted product on agricultural land was found to be the most desirable alternative. The use of composting for treatment also allows for possible co- composting with municipal refuse in the future. It is proposed that the composting facilities be constructed on the property currently being used as the City landfill . F-4 200521 Since solids treatment facilities will be built with a federal grant, the study must be approved by both the State Health Department and Environmental Protection Agency. It is currentlY being reviewed by the State. If a grant is offered after the start of the Federal fiscal Year (October 1 ) , design o£ the facilities will be completed by spring of 1988 and construction is • scheduled to start in summer or fall of that year. The construction period is estimated to last between 1 and 1-1/2 years, therefore the facilities will probably not be in place and operational until the spring of 1990. Until then, land application will probably continue to be used for sludge disposal, although an interim arrangement with Vertec for privatization of sludge treatment is being actively pursued. Construction and operation of the composting facilities will not require any increase in sewer charges for City residents, since the costs of the plant expansion, including solids handling, were included in previous rate increases. • 2C CS?", F-5 ofilWilw M y Sludge ,S‘4.... /3Bo i composting In the be said. � ' city could negotiate with the firm , discussed owning the�`�V�`"` e 'er tor—an experimental device at the wastewater treatment plant JOHN fRYAR that also can reduce sludge to err By J By Ga Stott Writer ter and ash — to reduce Long- ,Times sludge volumes until the The arty for to build a all mils • firm composting also Cow is ed bar lion facility a edge iscompos inghi a Long-"very die sludge and non-toxic industrial • mom's sewage sludge b in a"very • wash from private badoeoa preliminary"stage,Tuesday the city eon¢ and other CammDaitiat in the del was tolum, director f theAr- : VTR,sincelongmoetdoesnotpro=. • den Wallttm, ies department's of the .� � �e by itself to wateri q al utilities department's • . 1� the equipment going full- water quality control division. � • time.While the council is not yet being CenoaA John CaldweA sated asked to take ISwe as the Plan, : WaUtm to submit more detailed . nil of1menAi�Swmwnau seex- i information from an analysis by nil se i erestcoun colleagues ay the city shift and acomnitingengit pressed interest to at 111t�9 nee ring firm about Longmo is op- night's study o establishment is a passible disposing df its sewage side benefit to establishment of a . ludge- such composting process p the use of As Part of the process of getting such a facility to compost Long- on - the necessary state and federal ap solid waste picked trait, la Long monk's residential trash ceIleo- • �farrthe wastewater treat- to applying'for a bans,along with the sewage sludge meat plant's „solids mwgagmoegt generated by man plant. 'thewaaewatertreat plan"fort ttb.mxot and diapo- . Sack composting of trash and sal of waste stodge,a public hear- garbage—after metals, pieties,s, lag has been scheduled for 7:30 glass and other non-biodegradable Pm July 0.is Courtroom 2 of the . items are separated out — could ' Civic Center Campka Third Ave- • help the city achieve a goal of re- nue and Emery Street . doting its dependence on lindted ; Amore detailed prim landfill spade for disposing of solid about the and .s at��dal- • Wall= said it has been esti- � la3 with age acids is to be mated that composting could re- t made at.tbathearing.Copies of the ' duce the volume of suck organic solids management plan are avail- solid waste by 75 Percent abk for public a eaminatk a at the . Ile also said,however,that even � water g0allty divfsio o offices in the : ifs 21.86 million federal grant can city's Service Center building,1100 be obtained to help pay for the pro- I S.Sherman St ' : . t. `. Posed sludge composting facility,it - could be fpm.to five years from . now before the process is in opera-, tion. • Lv,i,G AltAC Tom"'%s — �'� v-4.4-y % 7x97 - • sc'�� F-6 _ . . ATTENDANCE RECORD LONGMONT, COLORADO SOLIDS MANAGEMENT PLAN JULY 8, 1987 PUBLIC BEARING • Name Address Mark Maxwell Black b Veatch/Aurora, Colorado Dan Linstedt Black b Veatch/Aurora, Colorado Mark Lang Black S Veatch/Aurora, Colorado Arden Wallum City of Longmont/Longmont, Colorado Calvin Youngberg City of Longmont/Longmont, Colorado Grant Grover City of Longmont/Longmont, Colorado Debbie English Colorado Department of Health/Denver, Colorado John Chase Colorado Department of Bealth/Denver, Colorado William Schvoyer VerTech Treatment Systems/Denver, Colorado Larry Jaycox VerTech Treatment Systems/Denver, Colorado Greg Jordan E.C.O. Products Company/Longmont, Colorado John Jordan E.C.O. Products Company/Longmont, Colorado R. J. Crowley • Local/Boulder, Colorado Jeffrey D. Thomas Longmont Times Call/Longmont, Colorado • wija • �- � P JUL16198PL BLACK & VEAT CITY OF LONGMONT SOLIDS MANAGEMENT STUDY QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS AT PUBLIC HEARING OF JULY 8, 1987 The following is a summary of the questions and comments received at the public hearing for the solids management study (facilities plan addendum) on July 8, 1987 . The responses that were provided by the City and Black and Veatch are also summarized. 1 . John Jordan asked if the $0.36 per user costs were in • addition to existing charges and taxes and in addition to what the City pays to match the grant. The City and B&V explained that the $0.36 was for 0&M costs only and that this did not apply to the capital costs (which are the only costs covered by grant funding) . In other words, no debt service is included in the $0.36 per user which was presented in the plan. 2. John Jordan asked for a breakdown of the capital and O&M costs of the alternatives. He was provided with a summary of these costs and a copy of the solids management study. 3. John Jordan commented on the odors generated by the composting operation especially during mixing/remixing. As an example, he cited the operation in Loveland which mixed sludge with manure for compost. He asked what the City intended to do about the possible odors. The City and B&V explained that odors were generally caused by moisture problems in the compost mix and that control of moisture content in the sludge would minimize the problems. It was also explained that the facility would be enclosed on three sides and covered to minimize the effects of weather on the compost operation. 8&V also pointed out that the proposed operation was for static pile, not windrow composting, thereby minimizing the necessity for remixing and physically aerating the piles. 4. Jordan asked why the regulatory aspects of compost were not rated the same as those for land application (re: the alternative rankings in the study) , since the compost is also proposed to be disposed of on land. 5. The City responded that the end product of composting is not • impacted as much by the changing nature of the regulations because of the different options for disposal (land application, landfilling, etc. ) and because of the large reductions in volume of solids to be disposed. B&V explained that even though composting would concentrate some constituents, such as metals, the composted product would still be eligible for use on land. In addition, the composting process is rated as a PFRP (Process to Further Reduce Pathogens) and also removes much of the • nitrogen in the sludge, thereby increasing the disposal options for the compost. a7O.3ti,' s • F-8 Public Hearing Comments Page 2 6. John Jordan noted that the ash from the VTR process, which was hauled by him when VTR was operational, was difficult to dispose of since most disposal sites would not accept it. Bill Schwoyer (Vertech) noted that they have arrangements with a brick manufacturer to take the ash. • 7. Bill Schwoyer (Vertech) asked how odor control at the site would be managed. B&V responded that if odor control was needed, air in the initial mixing and aeration area of the composting building would be vented to a wet scrubber using both basic and acid solutions. The recycle stream from the scrubber would probably be trucked back to the treatment plant. It was also noted that odor control was not included in the costs because of the remote location of the site and the feeling that proper process control would minimize any problems. 8. Jordan asked how large the composting area was going to be and what kind o£ structure was envisioned. B&V responded that the total site would be 5 acres, with the area to be covered by buildings approximately .3 acres of the total. The buildings would be metal, treated appropriately to prevent corrosion. • ste52x F-9 • s X11 L Titer Gut, leinfratte � 9 • ��i7 Hearing focuses • on compost plan By JEFF THOMAS oeive four at of four points far 1 Tlmee CaM stew welter its odor problems in i ranting Whatshoaldlengmmtdowith scheme otffie options eaWdeeed Sat tens et sludge that is Pros pQr�the j�� i • Jed to be pied&WY kens ranking. But the compost plan, the city's waate-water treatment which would De iodated at the fanny by the year 20004 • current city landfill site.slot& Ateceding to a Presentation by candy outranked the other op- Black and Veach, an eogi- lions in arena of reliability, nearing firm consulting for the flexibility,espandability and yr city ale 20-year Solid Waste *rational complexity. edmeith er either by the sludge cal youngberg, an me with the tester Division. can be: pp n. Meed Vim;; campastedf ht said problems will it ad ding an aerated'pile^.e•shotdown nd • ftheprojedandalb- amile-deeppipetoo:1diserader saeneeaondk— aneoea an flair. option — soon st an "air extreme temperaturestemperaturesand pier ser bbbar etaeldne—et add be sure. if the The 13.8 minim compost plan � o odor severe. was endorsed by the city's Waste Dan IJnAadt;the project man- Water Division and the consul- age•for maek and Vea¢h, mud tent engineers at a public bear- tboeompagy expos asmoebaa Int Wednesday nitbt- However 60 percent of the coat of initial one local midst said the cam- capital costs of the project cadd poet plan win produce a acre be grant altdpkw odorous problem than other or Operational costs of the cam. dons post facility. Lioatedt said. "Ire by far roe of the most would be 26 amts per resident— smelliest actions rve ever * cost Youngberg said has al- li Join Jordon reads'been figured tafo the cur ot 1640 Eder Dove. 3e• rent toe•rates don has been transporting The Longue qty clime is • ASP for the city since 1974,be expected to consider the project sea in abbot a moth, Youngberg The compost operatics did re- said. t. teolcet. F-10 • V OS24 . . SOLIDS MANAGEMENT STUDY CITY OF LONGMONT Addendum Prepared by City of Longmont Water Quality Division June, 1989 SeOP42,1 i TABLE OF CONTENTS Title Page I, BACKGROUND 3 II. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 4 III.' CHANGES TO SOLIDS MANAGEMENT PLAN 5 IV. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 12 V. COST ESTIMATES 13 VI. FINANCIAL IMPACT 18 VII . SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 19 APPENDIX A 20 APPENDIX B 21 LIST OF FIGURES Title Page Figure 1 - Project Site Location 7 Figure 2 - Location of Thickener 9 LIST OF TABLES Title Page Table 1 - Comparison of Building Construction Costs 5 Table 2 - Design Criteria for New Thickener 8 Table 3 - Composting Operation Design Criteria 11 Table 4 - Capital Cost Summary, Aerated Static Pile 14 Table 5 - Operation and Maintenance Cost Summary 16 j Table 6 - Solids Management Alternatives Cost Summary ' 17 I. BACKGROUND The Solids Management Study for the City of Longmont was approved by the State Health Department and EPA in 1988. The study, which was prepared by Black & Veatch Engineers, recommended construction of sludge composting facilities at the City's existing landfill site. Following approval of the study, another consultant, Camp, Dresser and McKee, was hired to complete the design portion of the project. The first design task, referred to as "predesign," was an evaluation of some of the recommendations in the Solids Management Study in order to more closely define the scope of the solids handling project. The predesign effort used a workshop approach to assess the applicability and costs o£ these recommendations. The consultant and City engineering and operations staff were all equally involved in the workshops. The specific items that were re- evaluated are as follows: 1. Transporting sludge to the composting site via pipeline vs. transport by truck (the latter was originally recommended in the Solids Management Study) . 2. In-plant thickening, dewatering and storage capabilities. 3. Sizing and type of mixing and aeration equipment for sludge composting. 4. Sizing and configuration of buildings at the composting site. 5. Assessment of odor control alternatives for composting site. 6. Change in location of the project because of problems with probable settlement and methane production at the landfill, making it an unsuitable building site. This Addendum presents the conclusions of the predesign evaluation and the proposed modifications to the Solids Management Study. l �(167 -3- II. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS The predesign effort resulted in the following conclusions: 1. Transport of sludge to the composting site via truck was confirmed to be the most cost-effective and flexible method. No change to the recommendations of the Solids Management Study is necessary. 2. An additional sludge thickener at the WWTP was found to be necessary for reasons of storage volume and reliability of thickening operations. The belt press was re-sized to reflect projected sludge quantities and equipment life. Polymer usage was reviewed and adjusted based on actual operational experience at the wastewater plant. 3. The equipment used in the composting operation was revised to be more applicable to the type of operation that is proposed. Batch-type, mixing equipment was found to be more appropriate and less costly than the windrow mixer originally proposed in the Solids Management Study. The design of the sludge aeration system was also refined with respect to blower sizing and the type of aeration piping to be used. However, the basic recommendations of the Solids Management Study were not modified. 4. The sizing of of the composting, mixing and curing buildings at the composting site was revised based on more specific composting design criteria than what was available in the original Solids Management Study. An operations building was also added, since it was not included in the Solids Management Study and is necessary for operations personnel at the site. S. Odor control alternatives were evaluated and, as in the Solids Management Study, dispersion and dilution were chosen as the preferred methods. The mixing building, where a major portion of the odors will probably be generated, will be vented through a low-cost finished compost/soil scrubber pile. As the study recommended, provisions will be made for venting the buildings through chemical scrubbers or other odor control facilities if it becomes necessary to do so in the future. 6. A site adjacent to the landfill, which does not contain trash fill or other problem materials, was identified as a possible site for the composting facilities. Purchase of the site was recommended. Costs of these changes were incorporated into the project cost estimates and the cost-effectiveness analysis in the Solids Management Study was revised. There was essentially no change in the cost of composting relative to other alternatives evaluated in the Study. Environmental and financial impacts were also re- analyzed and found to be the same as in the original Solids Management Study. Therefore, it was confirmed that aerated static pile composting was still the most cost-effective and environmentally acceptable solids handling alternative. -4- 0824 III. CHANGES TO SOLIDS MANAGEMENT PLAN The predesign effort resulted in several recommended changes to the facilities plan. Essentially, they are all refinements of the project as -originally proposed, and do not change the relative cost-effectiveness of composting or any other aspects of the original alternative evaluation, including environmental impacts. The changes and the resulting revised cost estimates are discussed in the following sections. A. Project site relocation During the preparation of the Solids Management Study the City's solid waste division was asked to provide information about which areas at the City landfill would be usable for the sludge composting, facilities. Based on the available records of fill material, which were sketchy for the areas in question, the solid waste division recommended keeping any structures as close to the North boundary of the landfill as possible. In March of 1989, soil borings were taken at the proposed site on the landfill. The results of these borings are contained in Appendix A. Trash depths under the ,proposed locations of the composting structures ranged from 10 feet to over 40 feet. Based on these results, cost estimates were prepared for corrective measures which would be needed to allow construction of the composting facilities on the landfill. Table 1 shows the results of the cost estimates and a comparison with "standard" construction costs at a site off the landfill. For purposes of these estimates, the cost of an off-landfill site was estimated at $11,000 per acre, based on property values in the area east of the landfill. The composting facilities will require 11 acres to provide buffer zones and comply with other land use considerations. TABLE 1 Comparison of Building Construction Costs Building Cost Building Cost Buildings/Facilities on Landfill Off Landfill Composting/curing bldgs. $908,000 $596,000 Mixing/storage bldgs. $229,000 $181,000 Sitework $224,000 $272,000 Land cost 11.0 acres @ -0- $121,000 $11,000/acre Totals $1, 361,000 $1,170,000 The higher values for construction on the landfill stem from the need for caissons to support the buildings, additional grading and excavation and gas collection/ venting systems to treat methane and other off-gases. The costs are for construction only, and do not include future costs for re-grading and re- paving associated with settlement of the land at the site. Since the landfill will probably settle as much as 10$ over the next 20 years, these costs could be significant. 5,40082 -5- 4 Because of the cost difference noted in Table 1 and the future settlement and environmental problems associated with construction on the landfill, it is recommended that the composting facilities be constructed at a site other than the landfill. However, a new site needs to be close to the original in order to avoid avoid any additional environmental impacts. Proximity to the landfill is also required to accommodate the planned disposal of compost at the landfill and minimize disposal- related transportation costs. A review of property in the area found that the land adjacent to the North landfill boundary is available. Construction on this property would move the composting facilities approximately 500 feet to the North of their original location. The locations of the original site and the proposed site are shown in Figure 1. The new site presents several implementation problems. First, if . Federal funds are to be used for purchase of the land, an ' appraisal to determine fair market value is required. Second, proper zoning, as well as a Certificate of Designation for a waste processing facility, need to be obtained from Weld County. Although the property is currently zoned for light industrial/commercial use, Weld County officials have indicated that there would be no problem with rezoning the property for use as a composting facility. They have also stated that the Certificate of Designation for the existing landfill could be modified to include a sludge processing facility and that it could be extended to the new property following rezoning. B. Thickening, dewatering and sludge storage at WWTP One of the original findings of the Solids Management Study was that the existing thickener at the wastewater plant did not have sufficient capacity for the projected sludge loadings. Also, the sludge removal rate required to feed the belt presses in an 8- hour shift was found to be 152 gallons per minute, which is too high for proper operation of the thickener (over 65 gallons per minute causes the sludge blanket to be pulled out and dilution of sludge) . The Solids Management Study recommended additional piping to the digesters and belt presses or separate sludge storage tanks to solve this problem. However, the Study failed to include any facilities or costs associated with these recommendations. The Study's evaluation of the thickener also did not account for the lack of unit process redundancy. During predesign, several thickener operation options were analyzed, including one of those mentioned in the Solids Management Study, the use of storage tanks for buffering the sludge drawoff from the thickener. Storage tanks were ruled out since the existing thickener has inadequate solids capacity to handle design year loadings and could not produce adequately thickened sludge for later dewatering by the belt presses. This indicated that a second thickener was necessary. An additional reason for a new thickener was provided by its ability to serve as a sludge storage tank. Since the assumptions for operation of the composting project were based on an 8 hour day and 5-day- per-week operation, sludge must be stored in the plant over -6- SC.C624 L\ .\ . ) c , . . .: a i r ,r { } o ! ill \\ 2 in I (i./ C 7 y; .11-&\1! , I I - i( ' \ `pr...�.'�, ••;:•"��t„/lam �+ 1 - 1 / � •� �y.! ,s.:.) ' S f ry' r r� try l _ t --� ' r ' ...4L) . . ' (\ �` • • PROJ'CT S . of° • \: _ �� : ., — _ . , . r o �,� ,1�„ . ��,. ; . t, g �', ✓,�i !f{i=�°{mss`a � QRI6xNAL PROJECT 4t ter tl Il ( • c O• %/ . V b4 _�•.,, •1 I -t,• Es ,� 2� 2. �. -4 • y` s • 5}� 1 .... d IB -. . VICINITY MAP - Source: USGS Map—Longmont Quadrangle Figure i Project Site Location SC 0621112 i ' • weekends, which can last up to three days. Two thickeners would provide adequate sludge storage, allow the belt presses to be fed at a rate of less than 65 gpm and still provide for retention of waste sludge over weekends. Lack of redundancy in a critical part of the sludge treatment operation is an additional reason for a second thickener. The existing thickener is the only unit of its type at the plant. Gravity thickening to 6% solids is essential to provide proper solids concentrations to both the digester and the belt press. If the thickener were to go out of service for any length of time, even a few days, it would not be possible to dewater sludge to an adequate concentration for composting. Although unthickened sludge could be routed to the digesters, several days' production would reduce their treatment capacity and cause operational upsets. Dewatering the sludge to the necessary 23%-25% after partial digestion would also be difficult. Two thickeners are also necessary to provide capacity for future sludge loads and allow the use of either thickener as a backup unit to prevent operational upsets. For the above reasons, the addition of a second thickener identical to the existing unit is recommended. The design criteria for the thickener and the available storage volumes and underflow rates are shown in Table 2. TABLE 2 Design Criteria for New Thickener Design year (2010) sludge production = 8.5 dry tons/day Solids loading at design year (2010) = 22,800 lb/day Solids loading capacity = 14,400 lb/day Maximum sludge withdrawal rate = 65 gpm Sludge storage required = 138,000 gallons ( 3 days production) Storage available per thickener (4 ft. blanket) = 29,000 gallons Storage available per thickener (8 ft. blanket) = 58,000 gallons Thickener diameter = 35 feet Thickener depth = 10 feet A new pump station will be constructed next to the new thickener and will be tied into the existing belt press feed piping. The locations of the new thickener and pump station are shown in Figure 2. Costs for the thickener are reflected in the cost- effectiveness analysis and cost estimates in Part V. Belt press size was also evaluated during predesign. The Solids Management study recommended a new 2.2 meter press to supplement the City' s existing 1. 2 meter unit. Sludge production in the year 2010 would require belt presses capable of handling 152 gallons per minute. A single 2.2 meter press has the capacity for this amount. The Solids Management Study called for the City to purchase a new 2. 2 meter press in the future when sludge -8- v L,` SZCII • r(' t'li NO. 2 NO_ I II I i\ _ ' I I DUMP SrATI� - MECHANICAL BUILDING, o h i1 I \i..-s.. • �\� I; ".- 1) ' 1 \\ . \ SLUDC ON 6k BUILD! G �� \\ \ SLUDGE.THICKENE�2 � +! \ �QI \ \ \\ \ ��.• � PROPOSED THI KE N \ \ a \ Nei WASTE GAS BURNER , �� ) r \ ` Q ROQO�O�PGE • .. .. :.. .. . ez- i / .-.' \ ..--- OFFICE/LAB UILDING GARAGE' \ Figure 2 • Location of New Thickener at WWTP -9- 1.-Tie 524 • production was high enough to justify it. However, the actual rate of increase in sludge production is unknown and a 2.2 meter press may provide extra capacity that is not currently needed. Running a larger press below its design loading rate is also inefficient. Based on these reasons, a new 1.2 meter press is recommended. The use of two 1.2 meter machines will provide a capacity of 160 gallons per minute, which is essentially the projected 2010 loading rate. If one press is out of service, a 1.2 meter unit can be loaded at approximately 110 gallons per minute for short periods of time and perform acceptably. In conjunction with the storage provided in the thickeners, belt press capacity should be adequate until a replacement is needed in the future. Costs for the 1.2 meter belt press are included in the cost analysis in Part V. Polymer usage for dewatering sludge was also reviewed. Operation • o£ the City's existing belt press as well as demonstrations of other manufacturers' units at the WWTP have shown that, with proper polymer mixing, polymer usage is approximately 3-5 lb. per dry ton of sludge. Chemical costs were revised to reflect this figure and are included in the costs analysis in Part V. C. Compost Operation and Unit Process Sizing Both the size of the proposed composting building and the type and size o£ the unit processes to be used in composting were examined during predesign. The recommended changes are a refinement of the original concept proposed in the Solids Management Study. Positive aeration was chosen as the most applicable aeration method. After reviewing several aeration methods, it was decided that aeration piping that can be laid out and connected in place and varied to match the compost pile configuration would provide the most operational flexibility. Blower size was also re-evaluated based on recent information on positive aeration. Many of the problems with composting systems around the country, such as odors and inability to achieve stability criteria, have been shown to stem from inadequate aeration. Research by Rutgers University, as well as the City's own pilot operation, show that an acceptable aeration rate is 135 cfm per dry ton of sludge. Since there will be 24 active composting piles at any given time and each will be controlled by temperature feedback, 24 blowers are required. The curing piles will also be aerated, although at a much lower rate. Mixing of sludge and amendment was also evaluated. The original Solids Management Study recommended a "Scarab" type of windrow mixer. Static pile systems, however, do not need to be turned and mixed on a regular basis, so this type of mixer is unnecessary. It has also proved to be a costly and maintenance- intensive unit in other projects. After reviewing several different mixer types, in-place "box" mixers were chosen. These can be filled with sludge and amendment with a small loader; the total cost of mixers and loader is less than the "Scarab" originally proposed. The in-place mixers have an additional advantage in that they are equipped with load cells which allow for direct measurement of sludge and amendment as they are mixed. -10- QC C82 Other recommendations for the composting buildings and equipment remain as in the Solids Management Study. The design criteria for the compost operation are shown in Table 3. Capital and O&M costs for the revised composting operation are contained in Part V. TABLE 3 Composting Operation Design Criteria i Unit Size/Capacity Composting/curing building 229 ft. x 335 ft. J 20 ft. high Compost aeration blowers 24 x S H.P. _I 1148 efm/blower ! I Curing aeration blowers 8 x 2 H.P. 30 cfm/blower Polyethylene aeration piping. 6-inch diameter 3 x 90 feet/pile 3000 feet total Mixing building 80 ft. x 35 ft. 20 ft. high Mixing equipment 2 x 18.5 cu. yd. 60 H.P. mixer D. OPERATIONS BUILDING The Solids Management Study did not include any accommodations for the operators at the compost site. This appears to have been an oversight. The site is three miles from the wastewater plant in a rural area. Many pieces of equipment, including the loaders and the aeration blowers, will have to be maintained on site. In addition, the operators will be constructing the aeration piping, loading the mixers, building the piles and performing operational testing, and setting and controlling the blower operation. It is apparent that the operators will not have time or be able to use the wastewater treatment plant facilities, and that an operations building is necessary. A metal, two-story building is proposed which contains a locker room and shower, a small operator's lab, a break room, a supervisor's office and a shop/vehicle work bay. The building area would be approximately 3000 sq. ft. The estimated cost of the building is $130,000, and is included in the revised capital costs shown in Part V. -11- Oceraccr se".., IV. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT The changes outlined in Part III. are, for the most part, refinements of the original plan as proposed in the Solids Management Study. Although the facility location is different (by 500 feet) , the new site is within the same area analyzed in the Study. Environmental impacts associated with the new location are therefore identical to those described in the study. Since odor was identified as an impact of concern, the City decided to review and augment the work originally done on odor dispersion. An analysis of wind direction and speed was performed as part of the predesign activities. This analysis, which is contained in Appendix B, shows that the predominant winds at both the original and new sites are from the west and northwest, with daily movement from the southwest during the warmer months. Vertical dispersion will also be enhanced by the use of large updraft fans in the composting and curing building. These facts, coupled with the location of the project site, reinforce the conclusion of the Solids Management Study that dispersion is the most applicable primary odor control strategy. None of the other environmental factors, including the subjective I ranking of alternatives, is affected by the changes in the project described in Part III. Therefore, the environmental assessment in the Solids Management Study still applies and no modifications are necessary. -12- V. COST ESTIMATES The revised capital cost estimates for both the in-plant modifications and the composting facilities are shown in Table 4. Operation and Maintenance costs are shown in Table S. A revised present worth comparison of alternatives, based on Table 4-1 in the original Solids Management Study, is shown in Table 6. The present worth analysis shows that the cost of the changes outlined in this Addendum has not altered the relative cost- effectiveness o£ the aerated static pile alternative. It remains the alternative chosen by the City for reasons of cost, ability to meet future regulatory requirements and operational flexibility. -13- 6%032 TABLE 4 Capital Cost Summary Aerated Static Pile Composting 5-foot pile height Item Capital Cost In-Plant Improvements Sludge Dewatering Dewatering Building $306,000 New 1.2 meter belt press 180,000 Relocate existing 1.2 meter press 15,000 Liquid sludge loading facility 5,000 Polymer system 105,000 Installation 188,000 New Thickener Thickener tank and equipment 81,000 Thickener pump station 122,000 Installation 63,000 Site Improvements , Demolition 5,000 Paving 25,000 Relocate waste gas burner 15,000 Yard piping 90,000 Electrical improvements 50,000 In-Plant Sub-Total $1,250,000 Composting Facilities Land, 11.0 acres @ $11,000/acre $121,000 Static Pile Composting Facility Composting/Curing Building, 76,715 sq. ft. 254,000 Mixing/Storage Building, 7,800 sq. ft. 191,000 Paving, 11,250 sq. yd. 93,000 Compost aeration blowers, 24 @ $7,000 168,000 Compost curing blowers, 8 @ $5,000 40,000 Roof ventilation fans, 9 @ $5,000 45,000 Aeration piping 75,000 Electrical and control systems 220,000 Composting Equipment Dump Trucks, 1 @ $45,000 45,000 Loader, 1 @ $175,000 175,000 Large skidsteer, 1 @ $54,000 54,000 Small skidsteer, 1 @ $18,000 18,000 In-place box mixers, 2 @ $80,000 160,000 I I -14- ec t�5 TABLE 4 (Continued) Capital Cost Summary Aerated Static Pile Composting 5-foot pile height Item Capital Cost Sitework and Improvements Grading and Drainage Improvements 155,000 Landscaping 23,000 Paving 66,000 Access road reconstruction 57,000 Fencing 10,000 Sanitary Sewer 75,000 Jack and Bore (Highway crossing) 35,000 Utility Service Connections 12,000 Operations Building Building, 3,000 sq. ft. 130,000 Electrical 5,000 Water system and storage tanks 32,000 Furnishings 18,000 Weather Station _ 10,000 Composting Facilities Sub-Total $2,287,000 Total, In-plant and composting $3,537,000 15 o Contingency 530,550 GRAND TOTAL $4 ,067,550 2C.052 -15- TABLE 5 Operation and Maintenance Cost Summary Aerated Static Pile Composting 5-foot pile height Item O&M Cost Replacement Costs (Sludge handling equipment replaced at 10 years, no salvage value) Dump Trucks, 1 @ $45,0.00 $ 45,000 Loader 175,000 Large skidsteer 54,000 Small skidsteer 18,000 Total Replacement Cost $292,000 Operation Costs Labor, 4 operators @ $32,400/yr. $129,600 Labor, 1 mechanic @ $32,400/yr. 32,400 Labor, 1 Supervisor @ $38,400/yr. 38,400 Fuel, 7,300 gals/yr. @ $0.64/gal. 4,700 Power, 706,275 kwh/yr. @ $0.06/kwh 43,000 Polymer, 15,500 lb. @ $3.00/lb. 46,500 Maintenance Costs Loaders and dump trucks 4,000 Composting equipment 9,000 Total O&M costs $307,600 . 6 O N 4 4 r 4 M M a r a o e �� w a P M M ma.mam ma cm 0 o a ma ma b v t a y - r - r w F al • M 44 � w w O am O O am O o O O Ime a u o _• _ 4 mms• _am _ c am am a N Fs o o am a▪ b P O • r _ es at 4 momm m ea i T a a_ ma w S M a es ra b ma ma am 0 am ma ma Ma O_ _4_ O •am M m Y !V ...• 4. W ea O am am ma ea r P as _ maa am am cm ma u _ M a r . A Y y a a am ea w O i w U a s am v. o e o slab Sool � IMP o e w - - 0 ma am o � u o 0 re eft an a o a . . a - - - wes s w � WV m ma ma w ma F u O m P 4 m O ma e O• 4. a G t O �_ m ! -+ F N r p F O W 3 Y Y V 0 _ ? � 5 u -_ • r m M ]c w al s p as m U w r A� tar .0 • m 6 V VP e e O N O 4 m a u a am co • a. .P 0 ama F am O • w nT .--• _ r. mow _ 1 O e ▪ D 4 som O w a 4 Ora a. am 0 O ma ma O m Cm cm a F 4 a u a Oam a ma am ma ✓ r a 0 r - es A A w �▪� m O A awm i ▪ ma 4 O re _ ea ti✓ o 4" ur e m o am • mam as aa m O ✓ u .-a0 r O M r m CY V 4 4 ✓ o u a em A mr p ti ▪ p M Y u a a a y _ ` ` p ` Y 60 -.0 Y. n e D. a. 0 mow am b am ....• b p \ A M ma u a a - a.. r • o 0y am Uma a 8P ti Y rr ma C Y yes • y a. Cr . am am as N am 4. O am u . u um o 0 A — a am U▪ 6 0 0• a u. e4 W m F 5 c Y —17- Qr'ctszzi VI. FINANCIAL IMPACT As noted in the Solids Management Study, the addition of the sludge composting operation is not expected to have any effect on the City of Longmont' s rates or charges to customers. Operators for the new facilities will be taken from the existing staff positions, therefore salary expenses are already included in the existing plant budget. There are sufficient funds in the wastewater operating fund to cover all other O&M expenses incurred by this project. The City passed its sewer use ordinance in 1983 and raised user rates enough to fund future sludge treatment and disposal operations. The local matching share for the capital cost portion of the project will be provided by borrowing against operating revenues. This was also done during the previous plant expansion (1985- 1987) . The City has analyzed these revenues and determined that they are adequate to fund the local share. Therefore, the solids handling project will have no additional financial impact on the users of Longmont's wastewater system. tern -18- VII. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS The City o£ Longmont and Slack & Veatch .engineers completed a Solids Management Study in 1987, which was approved by the State and EPA in 1988. Portions of the solids handling project described in that Study were re-evaluated during the initial part of the project's design phase. In-plant equipment needs were examined, resulting in the recommended construction of a new thickener and reduction in size of the belt press. Design assumptions for the composting part of the project were revised to account for recent developments in composting operation. Building sizes were reduced and the size and number of blowers were modified accordingly. Potential problems with construction on the City's existing landfill resulted in a change in the location of the composting facilities. Finally, an operations building was added at the composting site to provide the operators With work space, a locker room, offices and an operations lab. Capital and O&M costs were developed for the recommended changes and a present worth analysis was performed to compare the revised project to the other alternatives originally evaluated in the Solids Management Study. The changes in the project reduced the present worth of aerated static pile composting from $7,141,890 to $6,990,683. Costs for the other alternatives remained unchanged. The lower cost for static pile composting did not alter its relative position in the comparison; within the accuracy of cost estimating at this point, it is still equal to the least cost alternative. There were no additional environmental factors or financial impacts due to the changes in the recommended project. The assessment of these items in the Solids Management Study remains unchanged. -19- u ii2oz APPENDIX A , Soil borings at landfill I l eCO4 -20- Empire Laboratories, Inc. CORPORATEOPFIGE PA Oa.503•(303).0,0,59 GEOTECNNICAL ENGINEERING 6 MATERIALS TESTING 301 Na No••••con Caw.Golo,•Oo00522 March 16, 1989 City of Longmont Water & Sewer Department 1100 S. Sherman ".4R 2° 1989 Longmont, CO 80501 Attention: Mr. Cal Youngberg RE: Composting Facility ` Longmont, Colorado Gentlemen: Enclosed please find a test boring location plan, key to borings and log of borings from the drilling performed at the original location of the proposed composting facility as per your request. If you have any questions, please contact us. Very truly yours, EMPIRE LABORATORIES, INC. eaa,Edward 14049. J. Paas, P. E. Longmont Branch Manager Colorado Registration #15776 cc : Camp, Dresser d( McKee /Pik �I �?" r* _r sOR41. „� P� O)snM O/Rces V PO.00.16659 P.O.00.1135 PO.Doe�7•• PO.Oo.5659 ` eolawo 5w...ya,CO a0v:1s (303)7763 0000502 Gs WIN..CO 00632 Cheyenne,tNv 62003 \ f�0 (n 91597-2,10 (3031776.3921 (30313510(60 (30 71 63292 2• ,c a_a//t_.'— Mamba of Consullog EnoneMs Council TEST BORING LOCATION PLAN 3 • _r-ao-a ,"=1501 • 7 16M- r o r 1 A t-I17" Fj-. + 'fA e 2 Mat. ,. ro , _NR i0 No-6 MI X1Ncr `. NoX ' • GO v � t� � 7 ® NO.3 N411 gxrsriucr gee IAN . '. 14__. .Hal , 51i-fgaM wArrn. re-UN of=P yorE44T1 oN P"'NP I I I , • ( ( ( r II II 1 11 II r i 1 1( DeC^ \\\ 2 r \ \ \ \ _see.-_r b1;CY r-cato ra Hwy' 1 i 9 EMPIRE LABORATORIES, INC. i . • LOG OF BORINGS ELEVA11ON� _Jul/• ,0 reN �� b47 it 50 90 11/ 2alka (Sib »M See IIIIC"dialla • ins5 ` as PPM VIC.w . . = eas1 3S/T E 43/1? 40 80 FireSU/( wail �AM." wenn _ Wee mini ask gems = 75 _ . - 10/3 *Vats •35 RS Peva Pee -PRO S N y�M 1;/1? ig PS: 70 lu/1t :M MC 30 woe Sig SOS Ara 4006 I�� POO Otto". 0404 Peri Mil +as 65 10/1? . r2s 9/T7 r. ROO ass 60 23/1? O y/I 1 ;o ?0 era Pe Pere ea agar. PIPPO DIMS 55 � 50/6 15 illsear ■w Pea IAA I , CCCS2.4 EMPIRE LAEORATORIES, INC. p�� a LOG Of BORINGS ei-EVATIaN 1J011 • 95 .4 9/12 Fa 90 - c 13/12 '- . 85 �....I • _ ....- 50/5 �, 80 aC°824 EMPIRE LASORATORIEI, INC. • KEY TO BORING LOGS !. �y 4/et TOPSOIL ON GRAVEL FILL SAND&GRAVEL .0i SILT •i� SILTY SAND&GRAVEL 'J/ e ."*.•4• r - tl CLAYEY SILT � COBBLES 1' \ •i� SANDY SILT SANO,GRAVEL&COBBLES �w' CLAY lio •• • WEATHERED BEDROCK • V� SILTY CLAY __ SILTSTONE BEOROCK / 7,41 SANDY CLAY CLAYSTONE BEDROCK SAND - -- SANDSTONE BEDROCK • '•�! SILTY SAND LIMESTONE �• OMB fI CLAYEY SAND GR "w w I I�� n1 RANITE SANDY SILTY CLAY ■ SHELBY TUBESAMPLE STANDARD PENETRATION DRIVE SAMPLER WATER TABLE 0.0 hrs AFTER DRILLING (; HOLE CAVED 5/12 Indicates that 5 blows gt a ISO 000nd hammer telling 30 inches we;repaired to oenet,ete 12 inches. 0C10,324 EMPIRE LA0ORArOcuES,WC. • • LOG OF BORINGS . _I.ey/sglaI4 i ia.1 14a Z Ma, jia.A- i 9/I? w 90 IS/ iI '� 14/1? a-0. 7s/1t-:►�sewPea 46/if R.� 13/12 8/1 ..,..,. w %._� MA 1vI1) EtXg 1? � 45/II � . V 13/12 11� , 13/12 ''a 46/1 �M ti . 85 ram =4 : 20/1? a � x .- 7/12 .".•• MA _ Sil >. �►� ' aver 6/17. _ w M ry►w .. n.r.. . A►d1 15/I2 r" µ • fir/ I =I ear80 Kid � 7j12 Si • Ns( • . 25/6 wows Alas e." irc 37/6 .�V. ..��► __ ' 34/17 f®_ _ � 33/IL . ® �/° �' 38/12 � A/1Z It TS 75 12112 ' Gaw 50/5• tee C� �rr� ammo PIMP aa� mkt 70 -- 50/[1 040021 38/17 � - 50/2 _ tr..) R,,1 65 Igill On 0040t M� 10/12 ~g` r//1/ gNig GO Reim olowe sobs POOR. rasa -WM Ps •55 E it/12 . vvv. 50 =ft"" ....470,Q.., EMPIRE IASORATORIE5, INC. _ LOG OF BORINGS a9-1/" lal•I 144.5 85 75)1 :'j 50 18/0 MIIII 01.40 sows O 4 .J; ONOS 0101 50/?. 80 Oa 45 - w mereg RPM 75 I= S 40 WA Wg 70 • a 35 MIC Dee IS GS turf � 30 10 r WS 60 Pen ip/�L 75 55 � 70 Arnow ;. mos N�� 50 5076-r% 15 pee A., �0,52e3 EMPIRE LA8ORATORIES, INC. " LOG Of BORINGS 4014 110,4; No.7 Ma a 100 >/12 • 10/12 !P ttipaia 95 10/12 '�� 7/11 Erg8/12 != 15/17 01,01 'r7 hag IOC 9/17 � 6/12 Wee 90 ri/� ral 12/17 EPS ib/i/ EMPII goo E� 10/12 e'er 5/12 rM � � 85 row —22712 76/11 Li- - , II0 5-/T2 . 30/17 Smals see • • • • mao 75 50/• ' - - --_ 50/6 _= 70 1902 V EMPIRE LABORATORIES, ItC. APPENDIX B odor dispersion/prevailing wind analysis 2(08?",r ^,l-21- MEMORANDUM T0: Cal Youngberg, City of Longmont Roger Hartman Design Files FROM: Brian Janonis SUBJECT: Compost Odor Sources & Control DATE: October 18, 1988 Odor management techniques can be characterized innumerous way$. The WPCF Manual o£ Practice No. 22 considers source control, chemical addition, incineration and other thermal processes, precipitation, condensation, dispersion/dilution, . filtration and containment as practical techniques for controlling odors in was tewater 'facilities. For the purposes of this report, odor management techniques will be divided in three areas of activity. 1. Reduction of odorous compounds or odor precursors at the source. 2. Deodorization and treatment. 3. Dilution and dispersion. • A. Sources - _ Sources of odors at the compost facility will include the follow- ing areas: Sludge trucks Mixing area Composting building The site The sludge trucks will haul raw sludge from the wastewater treat- ment plant to the compost facility. Care should be taken to clean them and to cover the box. The most odorous part of the pilot program was the mixing. Care should be taken to minimize the time raw sludge is kept at the mixing area and mixing should be done when atmospheric conditions are the most favorable. • The compost building will have the largest area of odorous material on the site. Here it is important to provide conditions to maximize the rate of aerobic decomposition. Aerobic decom- position yields predominantly CO2, H2O and stabilized organic residue: anaerobic conditions yield strong unpleasant odorous j compounds. Good aerobic conditions in compost include adequate aeration, temperature, free air space, a uniform mix and good moisture conditions. The site itself can be a source of odors if adequate drainage and . . good housekeeping is not performed. B. Deodorization Deodorization is the neutralization, chemical conversion or cap- ture of odorous compounds. Chemical conversion includes flame, thermal, and catalytic combustion, chemical reaction and chemical oxidation. Odorant capture can be by wet scrubbing, adsorption and absorption. Combustion techniques include flame, thermal, and catalytic combustion. Complete combustion is generally considered to be the best way to deodorize foul-smelling gases. (1). In thermal oxidation, . odorous gases are preheated and passed into a combus- tion chamber. Thermal oxidation is generally done in the range - ' of 1200 to 1600 degrees F and requires a minimum residence time of 0.3 seconds. Flame oxidation is most effective for controlling high .concentra tions of odorous gases in low volumes. The odorous gas must have a fuel content to be flared although supplemental fuel, such as • natural gas, may be used to stabilize or maintain the flame. This method is commonly considered wasteful.of its fuel value. The City is currently using this method to deodorize digester gas. Catalytic oxidation occurs in the range of 600 to 800 degrees F and involves the use of precious metals as catalyst. The catalyst is easily fouled by heavy metals so the gases must be controlled. The most common example of this technique is the catalytic converter found on all of today's automobiles. Wet scrubbers can deodorize by chemical conversion or odorant capture. Two stage wet scrubbers were found to be effective when piloted at MSDD No. 1. The first stage is generally a low pH acid scrubber to remove ammonia in its soluble state. The second stage is generally a chemical scrubber to oxidize organic compounds. Wet scrubbers can add up to one-third of the construction cost to a compost facility. The addition of wet scrubbers to the Fort Collins facility are estimated to cost between $496,000 to $594,000 Annual operating costs are estimated to be $62,000. A significant cost associated with scrubbers is sidestream treatment, especially of ammonia. C. Dilution and Dispersion Dilution of any source of odor, even from'a scrubber discharge is important in reducing odor detection. Factors such as height of discharge, distance to nearest receptor and atmospheric condi- tions are all important factors. • The landfill site is surrounded by agricultural land on all sides with the Saint Vrain River along the south and east boundaries. j The nearest receptors of odor in all directions are shown belefirs V�.(41‘8201. • . % •- • ! Wu • • MP • T+ w • H-• .v saws . . PD K • r •+ ! rwwVa •• VD A_Y. 'p`A+n •.�-••n wn1- .•A Ov f +. ••An ••A+D�A 1••••a+A na AAAA . t^ w r•• 0rAr On 4 h.. _ 14. r � ••n^ ^ r jOs } M1 + w r r a + •J • r ^ ^ f^ 0 A• 0" ray N• nr an • nN • . OQ O• • wA 0• • agate • an O• • 'w • a! O•••D ••••00a • n !h M +••:h••K ••n a.� 0 rr0 Yw • C. a raw r �nw rr�r wr < r jn : y an an n w •A• ..r. •-w - a -. .• « a. a xL�•• Y'r 0•. a _ wf:H ^ r r0 a • an 0 •• r A• . awe. . DO o•. nO o•^ au....4%.• • .n O. • : • •• • wJ6A Ow ...et + atria.• • n v na hDs .' .raw w P Vw4.lw+•iw ••••YWAn •�••••OP•Pfw•w ••••••4 an• o F i n i s^ ••• •• M,. •A r•• •10w •+•A,' Vrae H . a •••YF ww. ••.Tn� , •• ^ •• •• - c Ww•ww • _ •. .. .• w w ••.• ya w . Ky' w t V_. N•t•D�TO• r•^ .TO ~•••M•O Nprn•I c•+• Cr awe nX•C• • fn w • D- O• •. • Or• r• tT . a•tren ^ a••' •Xa nn • a On are �o ��••r•• ' C wwMT •+••�n� YV•nnT l• a• •�•'� ^ a•• � a •a a a OA w V K•-• r 1 r n w •w•• - t, a a0 i^�I ' .. S 4 n0^NAO• �D •f0 ~K • fin ••••a0 OC 9• • ••••0 0• • OO O• • ar O X. M a N ...... rDr••nA '^w••n.A ••••A+werry n r M O w M r wnn O• 0 apt sae Y•• DH 2••••• ]i3xo 7.. _ wwT••^ AS TAs• n a w P r r r WI _ r r r •ir w .4332••••• • ✓ w • J ^. le • .-O qe C•Y•a • rT rC•• S-•O at • CO O. . Oc O. • DO oQ • n • •• • .. .. K aura•••• •••^wsAN 9••••eHn 'e n 0.• <^ O• •• M O r an O O •••r•• Dne ••YO r• - w WV St Meta a s ^ > a T a' a s w •• ^e• `' a a. Is: Y r w r « w .• — � r F w •r • .-a.• r + .• _ _ a J a • ". am it* :'a•: v. • Nh OQ. ••••••••• 00 TOM OD•Oo« ea De • a a A • S ID t wC TD. .9D .AA K r Y.• •r N 7 MMrwH AaNM1••H ++MIA+ a rh in N an O r tin Oa•n• vw0 vb � ^ 0 •MAMA. ▪AA••••W re.w Oa + J _ a + an O r ^CA M 3. a‘ .131. - a w es a w -• ^ n 'J w a Y VI • :•••re . •• w0 <' . ONO a • Mr O . a. 0• • Ca 0* . a < F j arnhen aw••-••Avw •naar:w at•i •rn a w <n aD•.••O••n - or . .. en we w•e '•V• o Warn,. ••••2•40 M+f;' ♦ •>• -• - •• • r rn O + min •.•A w •- - •• • a J •P. •r n i \. L• S • •J WIC •5'a •'Wet • rw • • TA !• • 00 0.. • At.O••• PO O. . r• • W. • H J Y •r Oar •Arlwt • r on • • _r D.• • • aM1 aD ra wMA^ ..vac H<DrJ V e• a — O r aM O r aaN aw W .a, _ — r ^ r .. a CO i 6'•tht • .• 1« D •• • r •C � r •rO •••• •Ha- •as.00 Oannaraa CD c 2* M. • J'^ r••• • • 0 • . a'4 . D K ....+A'A h•.wrN• • w on a ON •f••< n ono •tXD «+O C^ 5 A • r_ MYha�tKHs•••N a a a w w • a .•r r 4.4. •• a an OA •v. i \.• ='hJ"• . .fit (.1�•1•�,•'.S - •I :• .. ,. .. w aP... +A a • r4T•r • Or. a ,. 00 O• • Dy O. Q, Y ra• n}tr raar ea rV•.•+sA n+K••-n a ' n a rn w-+nr^ DM •rc Sots , ^ D CCP+. CC.,••••• . +Warta am? Ate. 0 _ n -• �• •n .�'r•� �•.' r w� n a a• n w r j n S ^ • T •• H O aT H` .• • • OTC . Ave N • -CC co • r OF • n�••e• • HD O. • ••• • 4 i •. N.•AhKH• ••t .J.O• . WC ...awn. • • ate �-N n e•••-n a nn MO • C r whJaJ •••••••••••••• ••nnrrw j.` ••• •• A I.A. r •••• **IA •On • a r ,•0 •• an wN w Pe MO in } F D Y 'twat• .• .ND 04,4.R . • An w , • Or a • 00 D• • CO ate . nr•V . '/•_ a c• wa< • • a • -e0 • n▪ .a. ZI V r O _^An•^N +A... {n Ah.•H Caner. O a -r a r an O Snrn A n na rC •••A • Awn? ••h7• •a. . r a 0. 0 •• F A ^ h w r •M• n Z. .. . - w a r •• '� . .Y on •.Y _ •• .. ` •(2<q 'p<t LKY W..... lgKCl ._•_Y •Yp •.S •YO .•Y .YC . .x •YO sooptan wax ' •• rcW.-Vr <W—W1 ••an .J r.;.W' <aWr•CA +wY<l• '••rKrfY i•+!.<_ ,a_ Y<_Y N ` +(rirV {aw;r^ S<na..V KSriwJ •f;:.xL Se•�•�• . __ _ K - X s y Y `t-Yrla .<rC� KKw<r• r-V ♦�'-Yi _ S. x L. V ... .. 0 U. J▪ C . 4 .•� I n Y. O 4 •. •• f 1 • W. a L Y N Y Y R L= L 'J V • S• ▪ ti V a V X_ K w� r 1• r r F A _ V r •w r V Y J M•. t nn a .• y l V :: r' . la ••-C• Y K Y. O _lI.' J V ••• w ,. ! �. < a a w V + •• a 4 4 a ,Y S .. • ir < C • K „<• Y• LI C < .• Y Y Z. a M •r r of a r Y < 4 + • A a a It S Y a ' K • — r •• D < •< i . Y. S K Y K K j l _ ot K. a H F - r Y + K r • a 4.1 Q F a A = t care • Direction Nearest Receptor Distance North-Northeast Residence 1500 feet East Farm/Residence 4000 feet South Residence 4800 feet Southwest Farm/Residence 4000 feet West Farm/Residence 4800 feet Atmospheric conditions such as temperature inversions create problem conditions. These are conditions dictated by nature. During these time., a far might be the only means of providing dilution. Important atmospheric conditions that influence the _ , dispersion of odors are as follows: • Wind -determines direction and speed of horizontal . • odor transport and dispersion. - Atmospheric Stability -determines the rate of vertical odor disper- sion and mixing. - Mixing - Height -determines vertical extent to which odors may be mixed. 1. Climate Historical climatic data has been compiled for Longmont. Monthly temperatures for Longmont are shown in Table 1. Precipitation is usually generated from cold fronts from the Northwest associated with moisture pushed into the area from the • Gulf of Mexico by low pressure systems. Local thunder storms produce some additional summer precipitation. Annual average precipitation for Longmont is about 12.0 inches per year. Precipitation data is shown in Table 2. Winds in the area exhibit diurnal wind directions generally out of the Southeast during the daytime and out of the North - Northwest during the nighttime. Winds from the Northwest occur in a higher frequency than those from the Southeast. Predominant winds generally follow the drainage pattern of the Saint Vrain River. The summers are characterized by warm sunny days and light breezes, with morning temperatures in the 50's. Afternoon tem- peratures typically reach into the low 90's. Late afternoon con- vective activity is common with showers or thunderstorms occuring frequently during the summer months. Precipitation is generally light, but can occasionally be quite heavy with accompanying hail and strong gusty winds in more intense thunderstorms. Winters are much cooler, with average temperatures generally ranging from the 20's to 40's. Extremely cold periods with tem- peratures below zero may also occur and persist for several days at a time. , • • :IF f AC••• • OA • r. • 0/\ 2• • wF.O• • K .'.n .•Am w ....pa ^ :r • M1 s • r 9w a•.••1.•• • walO� f A ••S • • - - w y • V or or J 0A.1•a•••0 ••• • Cr•wC J/• I•• .0. • FM O. • Oa O. • OO a. 4 Yr O. • V - L ..• •/l ••wl ...Can.., 'J' '•\ np • w 4.4 rem a a rF a- ca.. Nr a. rw n} ' a as r •• cw O e Fa f. I• a •• a .- •• a s S. P a � T 'K .a ... l-K2• r a r L rat la a a M1V O. . • •. Oa O. • f • M 0* . wF O• • OP O.• 00 O♦ • w` O_. • e2...•••1 Y.1� leL el OF • c O\\• • L J. S A Hr A^.e••e FF Al A ••w w wp\ O c ww O •• ...VW 1 I• C a •O••p •r ' w w is w a r w � w .. 1C w r •oa-lam _• 2• r rrx d- as. p r• WA e• . • wK •• • YM\•a. r F C • f •Ow .r••• • • 00 e• .T O.^ a '•i• ...or �\.•v'w r!I••Cw. . wF T. R I.1 • .C T•\• IwaOF • 2 ON.. wep.:' •S7Hi• S rn•• r� Fe w w w r ••• ••••• a Y1 O w OFa r • Ow V .(w • _ _ w -. r w •. E•• T r r w w • 3r4=P i - • • S r J..rr _ •I Y w•+1•NA •r^ •!_O?; w•^. • • M ••••\.00•. 1.1.0 CM1 00 Oa i Fw O• • YYYV X r•fow .!' anew ~ A wf � • • w.1 r w.1 e w 0wr 1• : P• - :••••••••••• V • - P P . G-.1•:=•••w . r r _ r r. a ••• r 2aw. • ' . ' 0 OTC • a •• 00• 11••• • er. M O • we C• • ww•O• •• .......C. -•C• OL C. • r •. • • K S•A •0.1 q0 O•• +V• w'• • a• eM1 • w •••• • P• OP= • F ee • Oa••DrN•' .• .11.02• r • M • SA •• r•1 •C went6 • •w. w e u r rN P w e - w T• w a • O v• ........ ....• DO O. • •O •• YO w. • tl•\ 0• • rr.O. • �A. x 00 O. • Y ♦ •\ OD on ...•N Y•w • n �F . a Ca • a ow ••• •2 .c.y/• r•• canoa\I\•.• .1 .1 O OA•• • .• ••• • a. w a• 4.wnT0f rc • a_ 7.w r 0. • w 1••, a Y•M_J O • w • . w T w r IC •in -• L I••• r • K ••CO-O. . D . Pe e• • wA e• . rM O. . M1F O. ~ • x o CM1•�0TJ A p> O.• rs JP . • OF • O a^ • P OA • A Ow • 1 O.lMprn .1 a . a••• w or•. .. • la 5 • -...a.?• r 4 • . ••••••••••C• • • SO O•ss • •• Y�•0 ,• • M e. . at. r.• •O• • • C • •• ••••••• •N 1•V.r r •In y .• • '•••••. •. ••M1 w wFY rP On ' ..W: .Flf •••• O- •• - P. C. •-gut i r r r r • •• .. r Tw N - - r:.•Yw.\�. •P V • 5: r:_ • V •.F•' S 'rte • • Y..'.O• . !w. N`T•C•-. •a. • ~Ilea • Or O. . TC.0. • • . : ` .....J I..' O.• ••••N w^ 2F ac rN N j' C. A ...flier. n •- •A^••CPV 00 V N w .qn.• •••• : a cc.� r r I _ ..� _ r r! •• ay . 4. P .n r - . T ..Z r 4• f ••.r C' •• 0• •• T�01.•C •••r vs5• q. • anr•a' . on O. • 0J O• ., y O • ' Q - K. • •e N •vw pe••J•aV ^F .1 •I ! 'c • w en • a we. A r+ (r 7 Fw T.. ..!•. FJ. T •'\ 0 1••1 D p vh a L M 2• ... r I. w T T • a r. G . C•. . •• NN C• • • q. •0. • 00 O. • CO V ••C 0 • .'• V yr•.N0 w • •A •a r-Y\ • c F Jn • CrC O�Y .-2 a^•.. ....e.C.•• h� • M1 r^D^� w w T • - M • a w ! w- • . . r :.. ea r - a .. J. e r . nap«ry 0O eery ••••••>;^ ....an•T•••fe••.11 • •......•••••n m a Jwn ee• r0•N r1.=pr • ' .CT .1 w c.1 O N ••• • • • _ _ M1 T a e •• 1. •• •♦•• C. r.y.L •_pJ •••••EX traz •r••.S<J[ •Y . •YJ •at•YP Y •Y0r • � • _ ~ �J .4V'-'J� 'Va }KN-- a • x f W CV Y ....• � JN tiKrKwle • ! - erX Y YSr V a t Y•R a YY G - • • a 4' !•. Da — r S 1• 1 _ J S. C .^ • r 1• - C N e O - = ••• . _ r+ _ •• Y X•X •l wFY in `• F• 0_ • in ICAXX "L N ( G S •• . Y .r.. - •• Y r W Sc 'J V V 1•• 'A V t d `w G� f S _ . V r • c r V de e - w •V •. V Y Z C K =S Y a J •, X •. r •• .w. ••{ V e. ' w a ' V V a 'J •'.V • I♦. O r ata n r ac f •f N ~ w.• r W w a b ' a .. w Y 6 L cJ a }' C D • O a .•. � Y Y_ • ' f J a: a i• i i. v ar a Q a •J ~ • 4 W re r a 1 N Y V S V . C S a CJ (/��,C�C/� s O 32/1 • 2. Wind • The National Center for Atmospheric Research maintains a measure- ment station at the Longmont airport west of the City under the Prototype Regional Observing and Forecasting System (PROFS)- Raw data for 1981 was obtained from the Colorado State Climotologist . and reduced to windrose format. Exhibit 1 shows total wind by direction. Equally predominant winds come from the Northwest and West-Northwest which follows the Saint Vrain drainage in the area of the station. The Saint Vrain flows from the West-Northwest in this area. Many of these winds are high velocity. ' The West-Northwest wind is typical of 'nighttime downslope .: , • drainage o£ cooler air.' The Fast-Southeast wind is typical.. .of daytime upslope £low. The strongest winds from the western sec- • tors are associates with large-scale weather systems. The nighttime surface drainage flows cause conditions .of low dis=,,;4• persion which have been observed by City staff. ' Early morning downslope flow tends to be out of the north and west, following the Saint Vrain River. Low velocity winds move odors in a plug flow fashion with very little dispersion. Exhibit 2 is a windrose for winds less than 3 knots. Again the predominant wind is from the Northwest. J The worst wind conditions is low velocity wind under very stable atmospheric conditions: Most stable atmospheric conditions occur before dawn. Exhibit 3 is a windrose for less than 3 knots at midnight. Again the predominant wind is from the West-Northwest. The landfill is located along the Saint Vrain Creek where the creek runs from the southwest to the northeast. It is reasonable to anticipate a low velocity along this drainage from the southwest. 3. Stability and Mixing Height v Atmospheric stability is determined by the temperature lapse rate. As air moves upward, the pressure decreases and the air will expand which causes it to cool. This is called the adiabatic lapse rate. The relation of the temperature gradient to the adiabatic lapse rate determines the degree of dispersion (stability) as shown in Exhibit 4. • Temperature gradients less than the adiabatic lapse rate are tur- bulent and have a high degree of dispersion. Positive tempera- ture gradients (temperature inversions) are very stable and cause the odorous air to move with very little dispersion. Odors tend to disperse rapidly in unstable conditions and disperse very slowly in stable conditions. No stability data could be found for Longmont. However stability data for three sites along the Front Range are shown in Table 3. sCosz TABLE 3 Stability Class Frequencies in the Longmont Region Frequency o£ Occurrence (X) • Stability Class Rawhide Anheuser-Busch Denver A. Extremely Unstable 48.3 23.7 1.3 B. Unstable 18.9 6.5 8.3 C. Slight Unstable 6.7 6.2 14.0 D. Neutral 3.5 26.2 40.6 E. Stable 14.2 . 15.7 19.2 F. Very Stable 8.4 21.6 16.5 • • TABLE 4 Diurnal and Seasonal Variability of Mixing Height Based on Observations at Denver, Colorado .Season Morning Afternoon Winter 300m 1,400m Spring SOOm 3,000m Summer 300m 3,600m Autumn 200m 2,100m • 0 C The Rawhide data show an unusually high percentage o£ unstable conditions. The Denver data would appear to be more repre- sentative of the conditions to be found at the landfill. The mixing height is also important in assessing odor dispersion potential. Table 4 shows diurnal and seasonal variations. Generally, vertical mixing is best in the afternoon. Sumer has the best afternoon dispersion characteristics: The worst verti- cal mixing occurs in the winter. Temperature inversions are common in the region and are generally • • worse in the winter. Winter. inversions can last for several days . and cause very stable conditions. • There are two recognized methods to deal with odors during stable • atmospheric conditions. One is to install artificial barriers such as walls and the other is to disperse odorous concentrations with a fan. n r ed..24 • (. . o •T4- \el 00 N / s[i in N y- \ W c1%-• as r` r, Ri r` / -n n r•-• r, Z - — CU V) 0 / \ 475 tn (. . E N. � r--.. 1 1 tr) -4- El % in 1 Q i 1 2 ii" � —s o / 1 1- / o W U c. I-u7 / Z Q JJJ r-9.:). >._ O Li }— � Pa . . 0 G � q - • El El a Q I 03 1=10 ,_ J 7. iI rc- eeCt;12'4 ~' O a 3 __I 17 W t` cam' in c m r cki •cr • m 0.5 N .-� . .. N .. Z � //asaj ` C N N \\ : / 1 m / / i '' !'1 Y M w / ei (U / J CI C a a Z co W LAJ W I-- (-) __I (/) Z � X � . nn CD � Q � � 1- ( o f • o ,CSZ� Z Z I; Y 0 3 1 `r `-' 0 w .- r0 < 3 n Z Z r-1 . � o-, GltZs4 v, v 3 � G1 A � oZ CO o � / r rri M � rl Z N -I NO n O r O D / a bi a / -it; x / E N la1 N J .�3 Nr1 -,-."--- J , '� L a fco \ r w / O r a \ Z N O o N \\-\\, 91 44 o '�, -O W O ;a ` b � N _ iJ 960824 ) _. , a i • 'c 9 ' Y 'C '. ci 10. C Z r a • . �O.f� N W 1706. x tl . v •2 y� S • -I /s LL. 4:St O CC 14" W M 8'1'06 a �- ►}- O ,t r- a o w � m ' m a y Q r- W u co � ltlWaaH.LOSI C. a cc. a r 2 W w lu cn W }- t 0 w �� a N a a = O.20 a o uai w co a r 4t. r w w < Vt.QS m z Q 7 a • ‘G QJ cc a) W 0P� N w U a • xM aEE t• of Jx 0. W w � Q = cc O -. ' m ¢ Q Taal Tr a. X 3aflJ.11ltl 1,1Ceszm ui z X i- x ui A REPORT OF A GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR CITY OF LONGMONT'S COMPOSTING FACILITY WELD COUNTY, COLORADO CAMP, DRESSER & MCK£E INC. DENVER, COLORADO PROJECT NO. 1453-L-89 BY EMPIRE LABORATORIES, INC. 1242 Bramwood P1 . , P.O. Box 1135 Longmont, Colorado 80501 200824 V 824 l TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents i Letter of Transmittal Report 1 Appendix A A-1 Test Boring Location Plan . . .A-2 Key to Borings A-3 Log of Borings A-4 Appendix B 8-1 Consolidation Test Results. . .B-2 Summary of Test Results . . . .S-3 Appendix C C-1 f VCet /e i i • Empire Laboratories, Inc. GoRPGRATEGnticE ran Rem 503 a(90.1)464-0359 GEOTECNNICAL ENGINEERING Is MATERIALS TESTING 301 No.Howes 4 Fort Collor COlote8o 80522 April 13, 1989 Camp, Dresser & McKee Inc. 2300 15th Street, Suite 400 Denver, CO 80202 Attention: Mr. Jose Valazquez Gentlemen: We are pleased to submit our Report of a Geotechnical Investigation for the proposed Composting Facility to be located on Highway 119 in Weld County, Colorado. Based upon the findings of our subsurface investigation, it is our opinion that this site is suitable for the proposed con- struction, providing the design criteria and recommendations set forth in this report are met. The accompanying report presents the results of our subsurface investigation and our recommendations based on the results. Very truly yours, 4'S P I ..1 r t EMPIRE LABORATORIES, INC. „F.:. �0 J "��^ e, A� A •+y ECLAO. /� C g Edward J. Paas, p.E. 'A*0:1% : � Longmont Branch Manager t:t.`y• .e;V,,'',: ',7,7',...,.0°'‘‘:4. Reviewed by: / r:„ .` a' W,,oC L� a`a�aEg B • �4 C.) P e�?iA Chester C. Smith, P.E. a la? F � rd President F. 4808 H y l* /pik 'r.,1& *acaL'�p oo`�z ii 'SON4p0 PC 092 A A\\ B..1tl1 GBH.. 1� P.O.BOX 18859 P.O.Bw 1135 PO.BWx 1744 P.O.Boa 5859 / (719)5 7.2118>CO 809]5L049410n14 CO 60502G,eeMy.(.080832G1vya,vr,NN 82003 /i� (7t91897.21te (70.71776.7921 (30.11351d60 (307)632-9224 "„ Memtlx of COn5rlatq ENineere Carnal I REPORT OF A GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION SCOPE This report presents the results of a Geotechnical Investigation for the proposed composting facility to be located on Highway 119 in weld County, Colorado. The investigation was carried out by means of test borings and laboratory testing of samples obtained from these borings. SITE INVESTIGATION The field investigation, carried out on March 31 , 1989 consisted of drilling, logging and sampling thirteen ( 13) test borings. The locations of the test borings are shown on the Test Boring Location Plan included in Appendix A of this report . Boring logs prepared from the field logs are also presented in Appendix A. These logs illustrate the soils encountered, depth of sampling and elevations of subsurface groundwater at the time of our investigation. All borings were advanced with a four-inch diameter, contin- uous-type, power-flight auger. The test borings were drilled to depths of ten ( 10) to fifteen ( 15) feet . The drilling opera- tions were performed under the supervision of a geotechnical engineer from Empire Laboratories, Inc. , who made a continuous visual observation of the soils encountered. 1 . 5.. eS24 SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION This site is located on the south side of Highway 119 in Weld County, Colorado. More particularly, this site may be described as a tract of land situated in the Northeast 1/4 of Section 8, Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the Sixth P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. This site Is bordered on the south by the Longmont landfill. A commercial building exists north of the site. This property is open, agricultural land which was cultivated at the time of our investigation. This property slopes moderately downward toward the north for good positive drainage. LABORATORY TESTS AND EXAMINATIONS Laboratory testing and examination were performed on samples obtained from the test borings in order to determine the physical characteristics of the soils encountered. Moisture contents, dry unit weights, unconfined compressive strengths, water soluble sulfates, swelling potentials and Atterberg limits were deter- mined. A summary of the test results is included in Appendix B of this report. Swell consolidation characteristics were also determined, and curves showing this data are also included in Appendix B. SOIL AND GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS The soil profile at the site consists of strata of materials 2 Ce2A arranged in different combinations. In order of increasing depth, they are as follows: ( 1 ) Topsoil : The site is overlain by a layer of silty topsoil approximately one (1 ) foot thick. The upper four (4) to six (6) inches of topsoil has been penetrated by root growth and organic matter and should not be used as back- fill or foundation bearing. (2) Sandy Silty Clay: Light brown sandy silty clay underlies the topsoil and extends to the underlying bedrock at depths of three (3) to seven (7) feet. This clay stratum exhibits low bearing characteristics. (3) Siltstone Sandstone Claystone Bedrock: Siltstone sandstone claystone bedrock exists beneath the clay stratum at depths of three (3) to seven (7) feet and extends to the depths explored. This bedrock stratum contains intermittant layers of siltstone sandstone and claystone. The upper one ( 1) to four (4) feet of bedrock is weathered. The firm bedrock exhibits high bearing characteristics and the siltstone claystone bedrock exhibits moderate swell potential . (4) Groundwater: At the time of our investigation, no free groundwater was encountered to the depths explored. Water levels in this area are subject to change due to seasonal variations and irrigation demands. In addition, surface water may percolate through the upper subsoils 3 v'C U' 2~i and become trapped on the relatively impervious bedrock stratum, forming a perched water condition. RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISCUSSION It is our understanding that the proposed composting facility will consist of a large composting curing building, a storage building, a mixing building, an operations building and a surface storm water containment and evaporation area. We further understand that the area of the composting curing building will be land balanced by cutting four (4) to five (5) feet from the southwest corner of the proposed building area and filling as much as four (4) feet in the proposed northeast corner of the facility. The composting and curing building, mixing building and storage buildings are to be constructed with asphalt pavement floor slabs. The operations building will be constructed with a concrete slab on grade. It is our under- standing that the proposed detention pond will be four (4) to five (5) feet deep. Site Grading It is recommended that the topsoil containing roots and organic matter, which extends to a depth of approximately four (4) to six (6) inches, be removed from the area of the proposed buildings. This topsoil should be stockpiled for future land- scaping use. The subgrade should then be scarified to a depth of six (6) inches and recompacted two percent (2%) above optimum 4 ;:0052,4 moisture to ninety percent (90%) of Standard Proctor Density ASTM D 698-78. (See Appendix C. ) On-site soils or granular soils approved by the geotech- nical engineer are suitable for use as fill in the proposed building areas. It Is recommended that the siltstone claystone bedrock not be used as fill in proposed building areas due to its swell potential . All fill underlying the building areas should be placed in layers not exceeding eight (8) inches in • • thickness and compacted two percent (2%) above optimum moisture to a minimum of ninety-five percent (95X) of Standard Proctor Density ASTM D 698-78. All fill should be inspected by the geotechnical engineer, and field density tests should be taken under the supervision of the geotechnical engineer to verify that the specified com- paction requirements are attained in the field. The soils in the area of the proposed detention pond are relatively impermeable to depths of four (4) to five (5) feet . A relatively permeable siltstone sandstone bedrock or sandy silt exists at depths of four (4) to five (5) feet and lower in the area of the proposed detention pond. Cuts and fills for the proposed detention ponds should be placed on slopes no steeper than 3 : 1 . Cut areas in the detention pond founded in the upper clay soils should be scarified a minimum of eight (8) inches and compacted at or near optimum moisture to a minimum of ninety-five percent (95%) of Standard Proctor Density ASTM D 698-78. Where the bottom or sides of the detention ponds 5 2CC824 are founded within the siltstone sandstone or sandy silt, the pond bottom and sides should be overexcavated a minimum of one ( 1 ) foot . The overexcavated areas should be backfilled with the on-site clays or imported clay materials approved by the geotechnical engineer. The clay should be placed in uniform six (6) to eight (8) inch lifts and compacted at or wet of optimum moisture to a minimum of ninety-five percent (95%) of Standard Proctor Density ASTM D 698-78. Berms surrounding the proposed detention pond should be constructed with the on-site clays or imported clay materials. Embankment fill should be placed in uniform six (6) to eight (8) inch lifts and compacted at or wet of optimum moisture to a minimum of ninety-five percent (95%) of Standard Proctor Density ASTM D 698-78. To minimize erosion, the slopes and bottom of the detention pond should be seeded. Pipes or apertures through the detention pond should be surrounded by a minimum of two (2) feet of the on-site clay soil compacted to a minimum of one hundred percent ( 100%) of Standard Proctor Density ASTM D 698-78 . Foundations Based on the swelling potentials of the bedrock at this site and the magnitude of the loads transmitted by the structures, it 1s our opinion that these structures should be supported by drilled pier foundation systems. It is recommended that piers be drilled into the bedrock stratum and that structural grade beams span the piers. These piers would support the structure through friction and end bearing. The piers should be straight- 6 2CC.21 shaft and should be drilled with plumb tolerances of one and one-half percent ( 1 1/2%) relative to the length of the pier. All piers should have minimum ten ( 10) foot lengths. They should be drilled a minimum depth of three (3) feet into the firm bedrock stratum and when founded at this level may be designed for a maximum allowable end bearing pressure of fifteen thousand ( 15,000) pounds per square foot. It is estimated that a skin friction of one thousand five hundred (1,500) pounds ' per square foot will be developed for that portion of the pier embedded more than three (3) feet into the firm bedrock stratum. We recommend that piers be designed for a minimum dead load of five thousand (5,000) pounds per square foot to counteract swelling pressures which will develop if the subsoils become wetted. Skin friction from additional embeddment into the firm bedrock may be used to resist uplift if necessary. To help provide the required skin friction, the sides of the pier drilled into the bedrock stratum should be roughened. All piers should be reinforced for their full length to resist tensile stress created by swelling pressures acting on the pier. It is recom- mended that piers be a minimum of twelve ( 12) inches in diameter to facilitate cleaning, dewatering and inspection. All grade beams must have a minimum four (4) inch void between the bottom of the beam and the underlying soil . It is strongly recommended that the geotechnical engineer be present during the drilling operations to: (1) identify the firm bedrock stratum, ( 2) assure that proper penetation 7 Of 0824 break. It is suggested that all slabs on grade be designed structurally independent of all bearing members. It should be noted that the bedrock at this site Is expansive, if this bedrock below slabs on grade becomes wetted, movement of the slabs on grade may occur. If building construction is performed during winter months, it is recommended that slabs on grade not be placed on frozen ground and that they be protected from freezing temperatures until they are properly cured. All slabs on grade should be designed for the imposed loading. In order to minimize and control shrinkage cracks which develop in slabs on grade, it Is suggested that control joints be placed every fifteen ( 15) to twenty (20) feet and that the total area contained within these joints be no greater than four hundred (400) square feet. Flexible Floor Slabs & Pavement It is our understanding that approximately fifteen ( 15) single axle dump trucks with five (5) to six (6) ton loads will use the drive areas at this site each day. We further understand that a loader will transport material from the mixing building into the composting building each day. Based on the proposed cuts in the area of the composting and curing building and drive areas the flexible pavement at this site will be placed on expansive bedrock in some areas. It is suggested that in areas where the pavement sections are on or within two (2) feet of the bedrock stratum that this 9 e:/C -5 yr Into sound bedrock is obtained, (3) ascertain that all drill holes are thoroughly cleaned and dewatered prior to placement of any foundation concrete, (4) check all drill holes to assure that they are plumb and of the proper diameter, and (5) insure proper placement of concrete and reinforcment. All excavations should be dug on safe and stable slopes. It is suggested that excavated slopes be on minimum grades of 1-1/2 : 1 or flatter. The slope of the sides of the excavations should comply with local codes or OSHA regulations. Where this is not practical, sheeting, shoring and/or bracing of the excavation will be required. The sheeting, shoring and bracing of the excavation should be done to prevent sliding or caving of the excavation walls and to protect construction workers and adjacent structures. The side slopes of the excavation or • sheeting, shoring or bracing should be maintained under safe conditions until completion of the backfilling. In addition, heavy construction equipment should be kept a safe distance from the edge of the excavation. Slabs on Grade The subgrade beneath slabs on grade should be prepared as described in the "Site Grading" section of this report. We recommend that the floor slabs be placed a minimum of three (3) feet above the bedrock stratum. It is recommended that a four (4) inch layer of clean gravel or crushed rock devoid of fines be placed beneath floor slabs. This material will help to distribute the floor loads and will act as a capillary 8 StCs ,q subgrade be treated with fly ash, kiln dust or lime to reduce the swell potential of the subgrade soil . It is recommended that a ten percent mixture of kiln dust or fly ash or a four percent mixture of lime be disked a minimum of six (6) inches into the expansive bedrock. The subgrade should then be recompacted two percent (2%) above optimum moisture to a minimum of ninety percent (90%) of Standard Proctor Density ASTM D 698-78. The subgrade in all other areas should be scarified to a depth of six (6) inches and recompacted two percent (2%) above optimum moisture to a minimum of ninety percent (90%K) of Standard Proctor Density ASTM D 698-78. Samples of the upper soils were classified for the purpose of determining pavement design criteria. The soils tested for Atterberg limits had group indecies of six (6) to nine (9) . Based on these values, we recommend the following pavement thicknesses for the proposed drives, floor slabs and parking areas: Drives & Areas Receiving Floor Truck Traffic Slabs Parking. Asphaltic Concrete 3" 3" 2 1/2" Select Gravel Base Course 10" 8" 6" Total Pavement Thickness 13" 11" 8 1/2" A feasible full depth asphalt alternate would be as follows: Drives & Areas Receiving Floor Truck Traffic Slabs Parking Asphaltic Concrete Surfacing 2" 2" 2" Asphaltic Treated Base LAM 2" 4" 3" Total Pavement Thickness 6 1/2" 6" 5" 10 or'cs24 All topsoil and other unsuitable materials should be stripped and removed from the proposed paving areas prior to i placing any fill materials or base course. We recommend that a soil sterilant be used beneath pavement to retard weed growth. The base course overlying the subgrade should consist of a hard, durable, crushed rock or stone and filler and should have a minimum "R" value of 80. The composite base course material should be free from vegetable matter and lumps or balls of clay, and should meet Colorado Department of Highway Class 6 specifications as follows: Sieve Size % Passing 3/4" 100 #4 30-•65 #8 25- 55 #200 3-12 Liquid Limit 30 Maximum Plasticity Index . . . 6 Maximum The base course and any fill required beneath pavement areas should be placed at or near optimum moisture and compacted to at least ninety-five percent (95%) of Standard Proctor Density ASTM D 698-78. The base course must be shaped to grade so that proper drainage of the drive areas is obtained. Dewaterinq No free groundwater was encountered at the time of our investigation, however, a potential perched water table problem does exist on this site due to the high bedrock stratum. • Therefore, it is recommended that a perimeter drain be constructed around the proposed buildings which are constructed 11 vCOSZ/1, within three (3) feet of the bedrock stratum. The dewatering system should consist of four (4) inch diameter perforated pipe, a sump and pump or other suitable drain outlet. The perforated pipe should be placed around the entire perimeter of the buildings. These drains must be placed at least one (1 ) foot below the finished lower level slabs and should have a minimum grade of one-eighth ( 1/8) inch per foot. Two (2) inches of three-quarter (3/4) inch crushed rock should extend below the pipe. This gravel should extend to within one ( 1 ) foot of the ground surface. It is recommended that building paper or straw be placed over the gravel to prevent clogging of the gravel media. Clay backfill should be used over the building paper to prevent surface water from entering the system. The drains should flow to a sump or by gravity to a suitable discharge area. The sump, if used, should be at least three (3) feet I below the finished floor system and should have at least one j ( 1 ) foot of gravel around and below the sump. A pump adequate to discharge flows should be installed in the sump. GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS ( 1 ) Laboratory test results indicated that water soluble sulfates in the soil are negligble, and a Type I/II cement may be used in concrete exposed to subsoils. Slabs on grade subjected to de-icing chemicals should have low water-cement ratios and higher air contents. 12 v .te1,42fr (2) Finished grade should be sloped away from the structures on all sides to give positive drainage. Ten percent ( 10%) for the first ten (10) feet away from the structures is the suggested slope. (3) Backfill around the outside perimeter of the structures should be mechanically compacted at optimum moisture to at least ninety percent (90%) of Standard Proctor Density ASTM D 698-78. (See Appendix C. ) Puddling should not be permitted as a method of compaction. (4) All plumbing and utility trenches underlying slabs and paved areas should be backfilled with an approved material compacted to at least ninety-five percent (95%) of Standard Proctor Density ASTM D 698-78. Puddling should not be permitted as a method of compaction. ( 5) Gutters and downspouts should be designed to carry roof runoff water well beyond the backfill area. (6) Underground sprinkling systems should be designed such that piping is placed a minimum of five (5) feet outside the backfill of the structure, heads should be designed so that irrigation water is not sprayed onto the found- ation walls. These recommendations should be taken into account in the landscape planning. (7) Footing sizes should be proportioned to equalize the unit loads applied to the soil and thus minimize differen- tial settlements. I 13 200524 (8) Plumbing under slabs on grade should be eliminated wherever possible since plumbing failures are quite frequently the source of free water which causes slab heave. (9) It is recommended that all compaction requirements speci- fied herein be verified in the field with density tests performed under the supervision of a geotechnical engineer. ( 10) It is recommended that a registered professional engineer design the substructures and that he take into account the findings and recommendations of this report. GENERAL COMMENTS This report has been prepared to aid in the evaluation of the property and to assist the architect and/or engineer in the design of this project. In the event that any changes in the design of the structures or their locations are planned, the conclusions and recommendations contained in this report will not be considered valid unless said changes are reviewed and conclusions of this report modified or approved in writing by Empire Laboratories, Inc. , the geotechnical engineer of record. Rvery effort was made to provide comprehensive site coverage through careful locations of the test borings, while keeping the site investigation economically feasible. Variations in soil and groundwater conditions between test borings may be encoun- tered during construction. In order to permit correlation between the reported subsurface conditions and the actual 14 ST08,2 x conditions encountered during construction and to aid in carrying out the plans and specifications as originally contemplated, it is recommended that Empire Laboratories, Inc. , be retained to perform continuous review during the excavation and foundation phases of the work. Empire Laboratories, Inc. assumes no responsibility for compliance with the recommendations included in this report unless they have been retained to perform adequate on-site construction review during the course of construction. 15 i APPENDIX A. I i I f 5.‘,470324 TEST BORING LOCATION PLAN t t i e , it / -- 54A,te S is -"too, 4ewri-wmgIJT ,} 'Evan -no 00 IZB A r'� 141�� -- ti 1 • 1 . • / t uo 3 NG.T 140111 _ ., t . 1 coMpO5Tl zei gIzl14Fr : ;t 4 .�_ ils t X i - No , g ,, I x; _. • ‘ii. ' — � PA N'0.1Q ' 1 , i A5PH.4t-r" P�.vtNlf errr) - , 1 Ii , , 647 40.5 ; i • ,.- I t t i • .I , ' 1w�7 6407/ ,. ,, / ' '• --.-PPeRAT1¢1J < ,'�,,' . sLVGr- . r. ..i ...... •� EMPIRE 1AbORATORIES, INC. KEY TO BORING LOGS r'„"r TOPSOIL •�; GRAVEL / •ZIZI FILL .•�.•�. SAND&GRAVEL arse e/� SILL' • SILTY SAND&GRAVEL Ktezi CLAYEY SILT COBBLES SANDY SILT •� •� SAND.GRAVEL&COBBLES CLAY g WEATHERED BEDROCK SILTY CLAY SILTSTONE BEDROCK / SANDY CLAY f f CLAYSTONE BEDROCK inSAND SANDSTONE BEDROCK '•' es{SILTY SAND �. ' am LIMESTONE CLAYEY SAND nom GRANITE SANDY SILTY CLAY . 1 SHELBY TUBE SAMPLE R STANDARD PENETRATION DRIVE SAMPLER tlr, WATER TABLE 1 week AFTER DRILLING C HOLE CAVED 5/12 ticket's that 5 plows of a 140 pound hammer falling 30 lathes wee requited to peneisth1 is 4 A-3 EMPIRE LABORATORIES,INC. LOG OF DOINGS 5L6Vp.T1o1J Mal 140.2 110.3 WM- 4920 5/i2y Y. , 4915 4/12 ,'� r ri, ri rr+�® / j __- 8/12 (K) 50/6 i, = "1 r. • 4910 --- --- r• - -- 4/12 *; :. 50/1 2= 7/12 rf --- _� =\ --- 4905 -- --- _ -- 38/12 50/5 4-- 50/12 51-i- 50/6 :L --- - 4900 - -. 50/9 50/6 4895 A-4 EMPIRE LAOORATORIES, INC. LOG OF BORINGS Ei-evA.rlai ti05. NO.& mar 14108 4920 _ 4915 Y'd 7/12. i ; . 72/12 i. 4910 --- 3/12 9/12 tw r.y- _ . • /1 • . i { . _50/11 •,. 'y _ 4112 ~•• 8/12 _ 4(12 ' �i 4905 _ 26117 .�C ".. _ __ 32/12 P-111 30/12 50/3 - _ __ l-. 50/3 4900 _ __ -: 711, 50/6 •-L. . 50/5 - 4895 . , A-5 SCC82,1 . EMPIRE LABORATORIES INC. LOG OF BOEINGS ELSVATI Wa9 gala No.11 491s 5/12 ✓:" �r 20/12 4910 : 16/12 50/3 10112 • 4905 - 45/12 ! tas 9/12 V O/IL 4900 -_- - -- 50/7 1 50/11 ILL 4895 50/6 i.... 4890 ��. It y� 2 A-6 EMPIRE tADORATORIE3, INC. LOG OF 90RINGS _E LEV r oat No.1Z N 2 93 4910 / 4905 '• /1 • ./ 9/1j. •/A / 16/174 •/. % 4900 _• __ 4/12 rd'.• ,�/.J 30/12 _ 4895 47/12 • A-7 EMPIRE LA/ORAYORIB INC. APPENDIX B. �C GB21 CONSOLIDATION--SWELL TEST - somno No, 7 ton L oRY DENSITY 114_. 1 PCF % MOISTURE 11. 2$ • 44 -- . r � • .43 _ -, 1 0 . uz - _ 'e . 41 - , . 40 � I I A A . _ . A • 0.1 04 1.0 s 10 APPLIED PRESSURE—IONS/SO. FT. 1 1 ..atN=0 4pp�'A i2 _ , _o e _ 1: 3 V 4 o l i 0.1 0.3 1.0 s 10 APPLIED PRESSURE-TONS/SO. ET. B-2 SIC CF2/1 . EAAPIRE LABORATORIES. INC. . C .rv-. Na01n � � W N .rv-. ry .N� .N.. p. Al Ai. M •N+ rN � M wS. ��1 �� ..... � ��-..� ' 5 ; IA 4' 00 CO 00 I. 00 /SWO N 0, 0, 1. M CO IGO 2m in in IA Y1 IA u1 M N N V.- V1 IA 1 0. tE �V itO J V • o !11 i� CO u 1 3t n v- ry O . Y C�x N .- S 3� n — N J n M J .. 7 V CO Z tau Q p a W N CI W ,- i- M WI AI 0 iii ft II.; w_ O 2 O O O O m X O O •C }aA. O O CC W Q 6 M • s —y * W y N ..6 M1 D. on O O y� r � . pEN� Ai in in n V y r� In � . Zay O rC N Of O O p- T Co Co • a 01 N in T W ? I. O r. 1. W co u) 01 A.• 1C M 01 O ire • O 01 ... W S ^ O ^ O • O� A O�- ry Al r • r Cr IA O O I A • 00 O Al 000 ^. 0 0 0 • 0 0 0 . 011 0 0 0 0 M • a . e • • • Cr • • . ? . . . ^ • • . . OA' ci r M � O3 •••• • cT IA 01 •-. Cut 00 •-• vu101e Cr W et A' IA T .- � st) bbbb b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b olbb. bbb v O N M W eY M 0' W 11 M ? W cc: M b' c0 ea M O W S ben gr W C1 Cr a pe a J kZ ^ Al Al a' u/ V r 2C0924 aS I B-4 w r 01 .- e , M , .- .-. , ... 3 _ _ _ _ b !� � 1D D r al {f NO .7 O r rrr rrr r rrr O VI 00 0 t0 V1 O O OI O O L M IA MIA N 1A N r N Vf ti .2v 1 := a$ J U pf� Iiiin,43 t1 1 <. G• CO ' O- Y s of s el O S s `. X N Co a". M -1 J M 2 111 =Q 0 NW H 0 W 1- F 4. ? CC O b > ZS X m A- C. W Q 6 4 M 4t za� a O W co• N t.- ^O G Tu. � ,0 g N a N p VI N O N IA tLL C CO iG 0 :0. O M N 0- E a CO et N CO N N :I r CD 4D 1A or COO N VI 2 .-. N N e O O O of 1A 0 0 1A of . 0 0 0 0 . VI 0 0 /.1 . Co O O IA 0 0 0 . S 4 Vf 1� co .0. of i41 m OI .- C 1A Op , Y1 iS St= II, bbbLI, b bddbd S, bbbb bbbb J, bdbb v . O f.i ? r I: a rf s? N GO ✓? OM cT 03 Cr Mrt CO C Om 4 CO 44 0 6 V r et lli.F-,ry 1 z n CO o+ � +. 'C •f�.Z f3 B-5 ! � . . . k! � � ISe • Pi }$ )2§ CP # - a - . . S . •t- • • a ILO a'- cm . § - CC O. a, c - . 1 3 CC \ _ C &� )• -- u1 3 �}- §`_ cn a.- ^ � J . ck \ •/ }» \ \ §a. } \ 4.41 4.0 00 0 a / \ St rrwal a. tnat = 2 . 2{CS�l B-6 • r APPENDIX C. • 9(708.24 8.24 APPENDIX C. Suggested Specifications for Placement of Compacted Earth Fill and/or Backfills. GENERAL A geotechnical engineer shall be on-site to provide continuous observation during filling and grading operations and shall be the owner's representative to inspect placement of all compacted fill and/or backfill on the project. The geotechnical engineer shall approve all earth materials prior to their use, the methods of placing, and the degree of compaction obtained. • MATERIALS Soils used for all compacted fill and backfill shall be approved by the geotechnical engineer prior to their use. The upper two (2) feet of compacted earth backfill placed adjacent to exterior foundation walls shall be an impervious, nonexpansive material. No material, including rock, having a maximum dimension greater than six (6) inches shall be placed in any fill. Any fill containing rock should be carefully mixed to avoid nesting and creation of voids. In no case shall frozen material be used as a fill and/or backfill material. PREPARATION OF SUBGRADE All topsoil, vegetation (including trees and brush) , timber, debris, rubbish, and other unsuitable material shall be removed to a depth satisfactory to the geotechnical engineer and disposed of by suitable means before beginning preparation of the subgrade. The subgrade surface of the area to be filled shall be scarified a minimum depth of six (6) inches, moistened as necessary, and compacted in a manner specified below for the subsequent layers of fill. Fill shall not be placed on frozen or muddy ground. C-2 SicoR24 PLACING FILL No sod, brush, frozen or thawing material, or other unsuitable material shall be placed in the fill , and no fill shall be placed during unfavorable weather conditions. All clods shall be broken into small pieces, and distribution of material in the fill shall be such as to preclude the formation of lenses of material differing from the surrounding material . The materials shall be delivered to and spread on the fill surface in a manner which will result in a uniformly compacted fill . Each layer shall be thoroughly blade mixed during spreading to insure uniformity of material and moisture in each layer. Prior to compacting, each layer shall have a maximum thickness of eight inches, and its upper surface shall be approximately horizontal. Each successive 6" to 8" lift of fill being placed on slopes or hillsides should be benched into the existing slopes, providing good bond between the fill and existing ground. MOISTURE CONTROL While being compacted, the fill material in each layer shall as nearly as practical contain the amount of moisture required for optimum compaction or as specified, and the moisture shall be uniform throughout the fill . The contractor may be required to add necessary moisture to the fill material and to uniformly mix the water with the fill material if, in the opinion of the soils engineer, it is not possible to obtain uniform moisture content by adding water on the fill surface. If, in the opinion of the soils engineer, the material proposed for use in the compacted fill is too wet to permit adequate compaction, it shall be dried in an acceptable manner prior to placement and compaction. COMPACTION When an acceptable, uniform moisture content is obtained, each layer shall be compacted by a method acceptable to the soils engineer and as specified in the foregoing report as determined by applicable standards. Compaction shall be performed by rolling with approved,tamping rollers, 900824 G-3 pneumatic-tired rollers, three-wheel power rollers, vibratory compactors, or other approved equipment well-suited to the soil being compacted. If a sheepfoot roller is used, it shall be provided with cleaner bars attached in a manner which will prevent the accumulation of material between the tamper feet. The rollers should be designed so that effective weight can be increased. MOISTURE-DENSITY DETERMINATION Samples of representative fill materials to be placed shall be furnished by the contractor to the soils engineer for determination of maximum density and optimum moisture or percent of Relative Density for these materials. Tests for this determination will be made using methods conforming to requirements of ASTM D 698, ASTM D 1557, or ASTM D 2049. Copies of the results of these tests will be furnished to the owner, the project engineer, and the contractor. These test results shall be the basis of control for all compaction effort. DENSITY TESTS The density and moisture content of each layer of compacted fill will be determined by the soils engineer in accordance with ASTM D 1556, ASTM D 2167, or ASTM D 2922. Any material found not to comply with the minimum specified density shall be recompacted until the required density is obtained. Sufficient density tests shall be made and submitted to support the soils engineer's recommendations. The results of density tests will also be furnished to the owner, the project engineer, and the contractor by the soils engineer. • vCCS j7•i C-4 CITY OF LONGMONT PRELIMINARY DESIGN REPORT (Revised) WASTEWATER SOILDS HANDLING PROJECT COMPOST FACILITY PHASE September, 1989 PREPARED BY: RBD, Inc. CDM, Inc. �. 2900 South College Avenue 2300 15th St. , Ste. 400 Fort Collins, CO 80525 Denver, CO 80202 (303) 226-4955 Job No. 213-005 I 1 * i i I CITY OF LONGMONT PRELIMINARY DESIGN REPORT WASTEWATER SOLIDS HANDLING PROJECT COMPOST FACILITY PHASE TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1-1 2.0 COMPOSTING FACILITY 2-1 2.1 OPERATING PLAN 2-1 2.2 PROCESS 2-2 2.3 AERATION SYSTEM 2-2 2.4 COMPOSTING/CURING BUILDING 2-7 2.5 MIXING/STORAGE BUILDINGS 2-7 2.6 OPERATIONS BUILDING 2-10 3.0 SITE 3-1 3.1 LOCATION AND LAYOUT 3-1 3.2 DRAINAGE 3-1 3.3 UTILITIES 3-3 4. 0 PRELIMINARY EQUIPMENT LIST 4-1 4.1 DUMP TRUCKS 4-1 4.2 MIXING UNITS 4-1 4.3 LOADERS 4-1 5.0 PRELIMINARY COST OPINION 5-1 6.0 PRELIMINARY DRAWING LIST 6-1 200.82/ LIST OF FIGURES Figure No. ,Page 2.2-1 Composting Pile Cross-Section 2-3 I ' 2.2-2 Material Flow Diagram (Previously Composted Material As Recycle) 2-4 2.2-3 Material Flow Diagram (Woodchip Type Recycle) 2-5 2.4-1 Composting/Curing Building Plan 2-3 2.5-1 Mixing/Storage Building Plans 2-9 2.6-1 Floor Plan - Operations Building 2-11 2.6-2 Front/Side Elevations - Operations Building 2-12 2.6-3 Perspective View - Operations Building 2-13 3.1-1 Compost Facility Site Plan 3-2 t ii QCC82!tt 1.O. INTRODUCTION when completed, Longmont's composting facility will become one part of the City's overall sludge treatment and disposal system. Features and the background for the overall system are described in the U.udcre Utilization Plan prepared earlier. That plan con- sidered Longmont's sludge disposal needs through the year 2010. This "Preliminary Design Report - Revised" for the Compost Facility Phase sets forth the design basis and criteria followed in the preparation of drawings for designing and bidding the com- posting facility. This revised report reflects capital cost changes which resulted from changing the design criteria regard- ing the quantity of sludge to be processed. The previous report was based on processing 8.5 dry tons of sludge per day in 5 days which required a compost facility capable of processing 11.9 dry _ tons of sludge per compost pile. This report is based on processing 8.5 dry tons, five days per week which results in an 8 . 5 dry ton compost pile. This reduction in compost pile capacity is possible because present sludge production is less than that which was anticipated in the Facility. The composting facility is to be constructed adjacent to the ex- isting City of Longmont landfill. Dewatered, undigested sludge cake will be trucked to the composting facility where it will be mixed with previously composted material. The aerated static pile method of composting will be used. Active composting will occur for 28 days followed by 30 days of curing. The finish com- post will be drier, pathogen free, and significantly reduced in volume when compared to the dewatered sludge cake from the was- tewater treatment plant. To further the goal of volume reduction, use of woodchips or other amendment will be used only during facility start-up when previously composted material is not available for recycling. This method of composting was recently piloted at Longmont by University of Colorado. The facility will consist of a composting/curing building, mixing/storage buildings and an operations building. water will be provided by the Left Hand Water District. Sewer service will be provided by the Saint Vrain Sanitation District, with a sewer line located on the north side of Highway 119. Power will be provided by Union Rural Electric Association. Weld County has building code jurisdiction, but the fire responsibility is with the City of Longmont due to an agreement with Longmont Fire Protection District. The composting facility can be permitted by amending the existing landfill Certificate of Designation (CD) . 1-1 eceS24 2.0 COMPOSTING FACILITY 2.1 OPERATING PLAN The City of Longmont Composting Facility is to compost undigested sludge cake using the aerated static pile method of composting. Generally, the operation of this composting facility will be as follows: a. Sludge cake will be brought to compost facility in dump trucks 5 days per week. b. Dump trucks will empty cake into a sludge transfer enclosure. c. Recycle material either from storage or fully cured material from a curing pile will be brought by bucket loader to the mixing building and placed directly into a mixing unit. - d. Sludge will be moved from the transfer enclosure directly to a mixing unit with a large skidsteer loader. e. After mixing sludge cake and recycle together in a mixing unit, the mixture will be discharged into a small pile next to the mixing unit. f. A bucket loader will move mixed material to the com- posting pile to form the core of new pile. g. A new compost pile will be constructed for each day that sludge cake is brought to the composting facility. h. 24 composting pile spaces will be provided to allow for a gap of 4 pile spaces between the newly constructed composting pile and the composting pile just becoming 28 days of age. i. Construction of composting piles will progress in a counterclockwise fashion around the composting/curing building. j . Bed and cover material for the new compost pile will be moved by bucket loader from the compost pile which has just attained the age of 28 days. k. Material not used for bed or cover of a new compost pile will be moved by bucket loader to a curing pile. 1. Composting will take place for 28 days under aeration and result in material having total solids content of 60 percent and meeting PFRP requirements. m. Each curing pile will hold the material removed from seven compost piles. n. Curing will take place for 30 days under aeration and result in material having a total solids content of 70 percent. o. After curing, material will be moved by bucket loader either to a mixing unit for blending with sludge cake or to the storage pile in the storage building. p. Storage of finish compost and/or amendment will be in extended type piles in a storage building located across from the mixing building. 2-1 j 2.2 p2puss Design capacity of the composting facility is 8.5 dry tons of sludge cake, live days per week. Dewatered sludge cake will be brought to the facility five days each week. A single static pile containing 8.5 dry tons of sludge cake will be constructed for each day that sludge cake is brought to the facility. The composting pile will be constructed in two parts. The center part, or core, consists of a mixture of new sludge cake and pre- viously composted material. The second part surrounds the core and acts as a cover and bedding for the core. Figure 2.2-1 shows a cross-section of the composting pile. Figure 2 . 2-2 is a material flow diagram showing the flow of material throughout the composting process. The initial charac- ter of the sludge cake is described as well as the character of the compost at various process stages. This diagram represents steady-state design conditions when previously composted material is used as recycle. Quality of the sludge cake is described in the Sludge Utilization Plan. The mix ratio of sludge cake to recycle is 1.0 to 0.6 by weight and 1.0 to 0.8 by volume. Should it be necessary to use an amendment like woodchips (such as at start-up) the capacity of the compost facility can remain the same because pile heights can be greater. This is because of the structural support provided by such an amendment which allows airspace to be maintained inside the pile. In the case of woodchips, each pile would be 6 feet high and have a 60 degree starting sideslope. Figure 2. 2-3 illustrates the flow of material using woodchips and a woodchip type recycle. Mix ratio of sludge cake to woodchips to woodchip type recycle is 1.0 to 0.4 to 0.4 by weight and 1.0 to 1.5 to 0.5 by volume. 2.3 AMRAZON S7 Gina To control pile temperature and to maintain aerobic conditions, composting will be carried out with aerated piles. As an aid to further drying of composted material, curing will also be done with aerated piles. Both the composting piles and the curing piles will have air blown up through them. The finish product storage piles will not be aerated. Each composting pile will be aerated using a single blower dedi- cated to that composting pile. The blower will be sized to provide a peak aeration demand of 135 cfm per dry ton of sludge cake when running constantly. Lower airflow demands will be provided by regulating the run time of the blower. For facility design conditions, each composting blower will provide 1150 cfm of air and have 5 horsepower motors. 2-2 • i a.a' 4E. 2.45' cove e \ / 2.55' S Wee;Er \\ / / 4.64 \ \ a \ 15.617PiNG 5.681 u.55' r COMPOSTING PILE CROSS-SECTION . wiCr;74.4 IFIGURE 2.2-1 RBD/CDM 2-3 _ 4 ., t pv • II 11 n II II n PO _ O` r AN W CO A • V VIN00 } w N • N O 9 a 1 R A On. A er 0 N N < 7 In v• V i•.A 7 V F < N • • v . Z X . 2 . X Vi O r CO E 2 G) n u o n u n g < ' •W I V pwi o Li J C A MI �ii o to 2a N V • N 11 n p n u II ?. CA W N N rr •-3 v0 � V F0• N H 7 114 CYA O O m - • O• VI 04 p— P N N .•C = 7 P2 aD N r N • *---• . H H ,.., A O V• n A ' • o r .i et n x a N 7 7 x 0-4 "'C 01 W A o K O 0 C <s t- X x 2,•r� x A A DP II A il II II II CO N• LA N W HI W I-4 IT7 •� "i xi O V n n n n n n V Xl N •CO •Os O •P O 0 Z w N •' N W N 0-3 N O A FPO• O 7 0 7 0 NNVIWOOW ft et et et .� y N N N In a ti •A 0000 C� •C a 7 7 7 U5 Or CO V 0 o c40 a 11 u o u u $ u n u u u u z8 r r et••C CT n. LA C>` W N J� .1 1. r•• v O+ to w H r.. • BB NO CB B' yA0 FOO1 O 3 0-3 aTT N. rV N . t+7d CO V • N . •M000 N O ON N V z O O F0 a b • 0 CIO 00 • O rA rt M >. O NA R R XI O 7. 7'. 7 0 • 00 r+ 7 CY • 00 HI sr N I-0 N =• N co �• N N•C % ••C C•' O A A 7 rr .C K r Ccl u a u n ti OCO" N EE C < Co0 Ax ,+�Q7'1 < 11 II it it tt a 8 ` CoOr0cc < CM oyr�, .. .. .- aOPo � a n n u o u r- Fe^ O V N g V 'we .4 0tf W • V kON ANIOt/iw ' w 0 •N 00Y � Or- N IN T.* CT h•• rr R l'•7 O rr n n n < C < CO C0] 071 '-•••.< VI N � 'n `K 7 7 1 e4 O C �r1 A N VI CI r* 7• ' rr K 1+• R N• O F•' F+ O O W O 0 C O ttoo O n !<ii C7 cg. V1 ♦•. R I-•`C A w w n 11 II II O II .. O. O. O 0 D• r•• F T w ••• W . • 9901%) ,0 z z fP N O � N F r .h G_ C O f+ A re re . 7 Cr • 00 O ,M N 01 rC 7 7 a i- O n N A le = 7 K -< D n -� II II II tt O .R1 < W..(7 —p X X V) XV< Cc5 0 O C tC rOpfOf CA 71 D p y � COTtCnLL � N r 71 O n n n n n n gR ."a T m - o .- Fovlo ,y m o r NN °° aNA •N ; O t. .q A n eT n n N - <C/IOt- in Z • ca•C 0 N 0 VI a.. ' M o..) z G n n n n II n :cta c ca W r A V N P. D ^ • N N O �I 0 MI N L/ 0� 0• NN O rr 0 I D O V A re re C 0 •-•.• VI VI m n .•c . .< • n t- - .. m y � u II 11 II g 0 0• F N CAN000 t0 R no, et 7 rC 7 7 V3 N N frisiC y 07 n r i� IP 1 n t h +ly ? { Co a r to 2 II II II 0 II II I . [A a r a T., 14 CO • v VIN00 • n W O • Al • V1 i O A a X R R En CPO 7P " 07 N N K 7 N . �• N n y .e X 11111 x f v�iOr? cn n I O t�nOC�"' tn 7c 11 11 II II II II n < 0 A 0 A 0 A n r �` NA 11.40 V CD P7 V<+ O pCn SZ' y OAa QT •-• .0 C r ON • :"..1 . . > • 'o CO Vs w • O Y v V r a e n n n ll n n `O V• - 1 . 0 0 cl clR .•3 H P N N •K 7 7 N N 4A n N • •• � �: ? N •n o 7 ..4 n• N N r R a O. U° a X N Cl'•< N N y ,.4 7 O' n 00 x K VIN • 77 .C 00 n • • • �QQpf2 2hi o ,,`��,, � CQ.. S V{i �- O O T n oN0 r ca o LEA cT < u n n n n u a lJ LA N w N w Pi I I C : m p 0 n 0 Y A A A N wr • a • Z V. r DP ••a H wV• r N3vN Hz � 0\ VI ri• Z. n G) ?•4 i-• Vr00r g •n 0 7 0 7 • 0000 Cr O .t N N N 0 N •< 7 7 7 7 y �. � • OW N 40 cn worcn3E2 2g clEFutEE 8 ? ap a .•l O. M a r A 04 . A V VI VI La 9090 7:1y • a N V.14 • • '4 �1 aa • N • • Y IV Vs C. n 1 n o t% O ^ v k0 so N y n R rr I•+ O ►+ n h R "j 7 C ,4 0 0 Y 7 0' • O O PH O O M C O O !D „U' N 1 N N r N cia``` N N 77 k rz), - F. r rR� n l9 � r t• xi 0. LL - .C .<r r R C N 01 (D • MO W N O 7. 7' r { 0 0 to n rRR L Cora- y < I••• Pc ~ � 7 � II II 11 n 11 A •9a �/+ OC17 C Cn E � 8 � N N R r r r0 •-• V+ cn r A A 0 A A II pq -C O a w In O V3 '.3 A n • 0 PN O • ��++00 Ol r CO V+ VIW O. { n 11 A 11 n 11 V V A.N SO• .1901 OD T4 • nn y W O o Pn '+ O or R v • V V R X0 C' In X 7 IA • O 7 4�V.3 O r .C Pt R O N n .� N N 'N N (A 7 7 7 •C 44 Y f`S N N A C'' At In _ nl:4 w 2 8 u n n A n n 2 a r V+ 0 D N • L. On (n 4- iv „r, N .4 •VNVgO ) n 7 P •n O O in ca . � N N • C] K CO 0 , a c y O C O z o zrccn i $ `, 0 0000018z co a D r LA {.f a a o'.4 0 �••I N VWC. Na 1.4 . { n R R R rt [Gp•�• Q xo bOy Z -t = N z N fh 1.1 x II II 11 II II II y N'� GI 7) r WO. VION1.6) NI = N X "I "i1 W N N In V• 'O O u, m S 12 O 70 `•' o rr 0 R N m NN .e 77 Pi N ao �• N N I MO • W Aa • A r mm " 3 gE $ � u n A � N N r r • • v O N C 9 0O In N r ... • o o •^ • NIN a ta 4 IX g • Fs A i Head on the blowers in terms of standard air will be ap- proximately as follows: Headloss through compost 3.37 inches of water Distribution piping headloss 0.25 inches of water Air header pipe headloss 3.22 inches of water 6.84 inches of water When corrected for temperature (100°F) and altitude (5000 feet) , the head on the composting blower is approximately 5.35 inches of water. Air will be distributed along the bottom of each compost pile with three 6-inch diameter polyethylene pipes. This pipe will be SDR 13.5 and orange in color in order to be easy to see and recover from the composting pile. Sections of pipe will be held together with flexible pipe clamps. Three rows of l/4-inch diameter holes spaced 2-inches apart will run down the top of . each pipe to distribute air beneath the compost pile. Control of the composting blowers will be by timers and a tem- perature feedback system. Two thermocouples will be placed into each composting pile after it is constructed. At regular intervals, a PLC will read the temperature at each thermocouple. This temperature will be compared to a setpoint temperature. If the thermocouple temperature is above the setpoint temperature, then the blower will be allowed to run. If the thermocouple tem- perature is below the setpoint temperature, then the blower will be held off. However, a timer will be used in the control loop to prevent the blower from cycling on-off too rapidly and to in- sure that a minimum amount of air is provided to the composting pile to maintain aerobic conditions. This temperature feedback control system will be designed, furnished, and installed by the City to maintain compatibility with existing control systems. Each curing pile will be provided with two blowers. Running together, the blowers serving a curing pile will provide 3 cfm of air per cubic yard of material in the curing pile. Each curing blower will provide 520 cfm of air and have a 1 horsepower motor. Head on each curing blower in terms of standard air will be ap- proximately as follows: Headloss through curing material 2.25 inches of water Distribution piping headloss 0.12 inches of water Air header pipe headloss 1. 34 inches of water 3.71 inches of water When corrected for temperature (100°F) and altitude (5000 ft. ) , the head on the curing blower is approximately 2.90 inches of water. Like the composting piles, air will be distributed along the bottom of each curing pile with four 6-inch diameter, orange colored polyethylene pipes. Control of the curing pile blowers will be with timers. 2-6 2.4 COMPOSTING/CURING BUILDING The composting/curing building will be a rigid frame, prefabri- cated metal building, approximately 319 ' wide x 230' deep x 20' minimum inside clear height. Figure 2.4-1 provides a plan layout of the composting/curing building showing column lines,pile layout within the building, and sidewalls. At the base of each sidewall will be a 2 ' to 3 ' high concrete push wall to protect the building frame and siding. The main structural members will be galvanized. Wall panels will be uninsulated, 26 gauge color- coated galvanized steel. Approximately 6000 square feet of translucent wall panels will be provided along the north and south walls of the building. The roof will incorporate translucent panels, covering ap- proximately twenty-five percent of the roof area. Light trans- mittance will be a minimum of 50 percent. The roof panels are to be 26 gauge color-coated galvanized steel, with provisions for expansion and contraction. Along the ridge line of the roof will be 9 upblast type fans for ventilation. Each fan will move approximately 24,400 cfm of air and have a 5 horsepower motor. With all fans operating, there will be one air change in the building every ten minutes. Each fan will be individually operated from an "on-off" switch located inside the composting/curing building. Design loads shall be in accordance with the latest edition of the Uniform Building Code (U.B.C.) adopted by Weld County. Snow load design shall be 20 pounds per square foot. Wind loading shall be in accordance with the U.B.C. The floor for the composting/curing building will be asphalt. Thickness of asphalt and base material will be .based on the recommendation in the geotechnical report for the site. 2.5 MIXING/STORAGg_PUILDINGS The mixing building is approximately 80' wide x 40' deep x 20' minimum inside clear height. This building covers the two mixing units, the sludge transfer enclosure, and two small piles of mixed material beside each mixing unit. Dump trucks bringing sludge cake to the compost facility will dump into one end of the sludge transfer enclosure. A large skidsteer stype loader will then scoope up the sludge cake and transfer it into a mixing unit. Both ends of the transfer enclosure can be closed off with roll-up type doors. Across from the mixing building is the storage building. This building is approximately 78' wide x 50' deep x 20' minimum inside clear height. Space is provided to store a minimum of 40 days of finish compost in a pile 10 feet high as well as some amendment storage space. Heavy equipment used in the composting process can also be parked in this building. Figure 2 . 5-1 provides a plan layout of the mixing/storage buildings. 2-7 SC0324 • • • as.--aag.— 230' 47.S' 35' 1 47.5' • II 81.75' CLEAR (RUN I MUM) Ia 2.5' I 1N UMMI) ; .— 7••r_- - - - -------, i c. >a O. I c a W I N To��-- - - ------ - -� • • H. --- - ---r---• D I v Ym0 7b CD n r- a ' 1 - - - -�- - - I s — _I • • L . { 0 N e N sab . ..t. ft. .4„_ — ._ • 7 —= - -------_ r - - -I H - --_�—N--- h k __ g vi I 0 . ao -- o+_ii----- —1 IL Q __ (�i 14 70 0_ m- - - -- - - --� • • ^�— Cs. -11 v r k2 as 3 g I z s c--) o w o m •- - - --- - - - - -I • • a -- -- -- -Z- - -• ? w TV F ;o I •o a m -- _ R` N --` --_ - - -- - -�_ - - 70 9 S �' o • ,� r n •._ - - y - - - - - • • � - Z- - - -- _s-�.• A O 743 Ifr- h n N CN 13W O .0 N N •—.-2— ,..-. - - -- - - -1 • • � — 0- - --- - - - --• N N W - I 0 C •- - - - - -h _ .-- - J • m x N .I I C ti • • 1 ' N reat I OD 8r }C C . m M G c m° ; �. E� 77 . SC" rr r a %Co� • " ac Z z . • C• � ,,n . C..1 . a) ea O . • on • 3 . W dX K cceIIN O ( a 0 m I s _ L CC W a N M N N O W J �V o z V ti J W n W J 0 .. _ 1 3 ��z I 1 .,. a3x1w J o2 a3xlu I P• . 1 Z . a . —I eel a Lu a t O oV Z J E 0 J ,5'15 ,LI ,5.15 O1s j `- m In E - pg W n c i t- a co b L- ... -�� t O . Z ,8L X 2 f A -- - - - ^-._� W• 0d W p.a eJ I 4 ¢ 73 I- a w I--r- � d to I u7w nt- � E ga9, E I e0. � ENA 25 A c vF `��'0824 C r li 2-9 Structural design and material selection criteria for these buildings are the same as for the composting/curing building. The floors will also be asphalt. At the base of sidewalls for the mixing building will be 3 '-6" high concrete pushwalls to protect the building columns and siding. Storage building will have 5' high concrete walls around three sides. Around the top of each mixing unit will be a wall baffel with an air intake duct to aid in controlling odors. A fan will draw air from above the mixing unit and discharge it through a scrubber pile located adjacent to the mixing building. Another fan will draw air from the sludge transfer enclosure and discharge it through the scrubber pile. This fan will provide one air change every ten minutes. Fan data is as follows: Mixer Faze Transfer Enclosure Fat Airflow Rate 410 acfm 1335 acfm Head 6.6 in. H2O 7.5 in. H2O Motor Horsepower 7.5 HP 7.5 HP Airflow velocity through the scrubber pile will be approximately 1 foot per minute. The scrubber pile will consist of a mixture of soil and previously composted material approximately three feet deep. The surface area of the scrubber pile will be ap- proximately 1728 square feet. Each fan will be individually operated from an "on-off" switch located inside the mixing building. 2.6. OPERATIONS BUILDING The operations building will be a one story pre-engineered metal building approximately 40 feet by 60 feet (2400 square feet) . This building will have a combination lunch room/ conference room, an office, a small bench lab, and mens and womens locker rooms with showers. A drive through vehicle maintenance area will be provided. Doors to each service bay will be ap- proximately 12 ' wide x 14 ' high. Figure 2.6-1 provides a floor plan, Figure 2.6-2 provides front and side elevations, and Figure 2. 6-3 provides a perspective view of the proposed operations building. 2-10 2CC.ti�y. ` l /1a/ao 11 ry 4inse sa'—a' a'l„ I I I i > pp I m I— S; O w_ c_ 1 � I o O i 81 _10 � JIIllII1Z r > n&�� D ? -1 H I - - � � _ a o / 1 rn / D P O Iset 1 CO -j ��IX CSI a _ _ I N WWIIUtlIIIUNBItliIDil��ilU��Ni1�V9'�JOIPIDl7IDtINII�tiU�91fn9�ItlUI1��U1f��lUU� ^; o I fi o a 0 a t I r N' + N .1) l I C: I P f t • • ineies ,1,-4' a _e. • J'-4. 4'-0' 4'-0" 4'-0' , H A r m x Q ° i m 0 m r m D --I O l N 71 -0 A m m� m p Z co r I O r rn D - -i _ O Z 1 - 11'-4' '1I TTT C m N N I 1 17.-0- r..? N !t., Y 7 O i i I . 01 1/ em . ' 1 i z 7 O o m > ,- In x �� _,, t illlINIESII . 1 n / rte . , H HMIH -_: /�i \ i < m < \ \ mII\ I rl3 Q lia e ( ' -0l� m XI lit a, l z - - F 111111 Z 0 1 11 1 \\\ \ \\\ \ \j1 I 1 l` , CI T_ ci ;7 m N N = 0,i W W t� n Ct W U 3.0 SITE 3 . 1 LOCATION AND LAYOUT • An 11-Acre site contiguous to the existing north boundary line of the City of Longmont landfill is to be acquired. More specifically, this site is along the west side of the road back to the landfill and extends approximately 873 feet north of the landfills north boundary and approximately 562 feet west from the northeast corner of the landfill site. The site is in Section 8, Township 2 North, Range 68 West, Weld County, Colorado. Figure 3.1-1 shows the proposed site. Locating the composting facility off the landfill site was neces- sary because the geotechnical investigation of the landfill indi- cated that the facilities would be over more than 40 feet of _ landfilled material. The proposed site is presently used to grow corn but is zoned as a PUD for commercial/light industrial uses. To be used for a composting facility, the site will first need to be down-zoned to agriculture use. Next, the landfill's existing "certificate of designation" will need to be amended to include this new site. The composting/curing building will be located in the center of the proposed site. North of the building will be a landscape buffer and the surface stormwater runoff containment and evapora- tion area. Vehicle movement north of the building will be mini- mal and no paved roadways are to be provided on the north side. Composting operations will principally take place within the composting/curing building and on the south side . The ( mixing,storage, and operations buildings will be located south of the composting/curing building. As shown by Figure 3.1-1, the area between these buildings is to be paved. Also, the existing unimproved road back to the landfill will be paved to the compost facility. The north and west sides of this site have no existing fence so a new one will be constructed. The existing fences along the south and east sides will remain. Building setbacks required in agriculturally zoned areas are as follows: 20-feet from right-of-ways 3-feet minimum from property line or 1-foot for each 3-feet of building height, whichever is greater. There is no height limitation for buildings in agriculturally zoned areas. 3.2 DRAINAGE The proposed site slopes at 2 percent from a high point in the Southwest corner to a low point in the northeast corner. The St. vrain River, located just east of the site is 50 feet lower than the project site. Floor elevations for the proposed buildings need only be set high enough to assure proper drainage away from them as they will be well above the flood waters of the St. Vrain ( River. 3-1 vrCS2 _ t °en te—N)s a�y yG-4S / i 4,P -� area 2.2-rn z • 3.4$ck/,/dtA ea f it o� z Z1,//'"� do // -A -4 m y / :77 �b �• .y�' ..� _ N 88'15'38' W......--/,s7:".7 OW' t JI 11 N... .. , A a A ..L V /7/// ''fia. #.. ''. I i . / / //act fi 1.11 \ i € r �a g \ I d5NN :, V W . �i"I�q��+'fntit Ut�,)s�'� ��ti I�1 S �t e r r rYrie0,4ny� A ri � � I. "�-yp� .Army,..+,. O s. ASH-to. t �..' ,. t%Yz t% 4 ti�,.4 1e, l .°N.1,1,1''' '.. ..(% C I ' y- 5N ,',\:„.,1??..,,j54 v� f i ^ ti 4 �fj ,� .0 1 01Z R -sN C ', s e • -.44 t4 Wig. t .• `'1! to B \ Wio \ ti my T. , ,. v s-Oi, _, fj p �� . ! (� g .D Rti ]�Q � - � 6 X 7� \ \ Z-4• - (�l IN C A 8= - i O O\ ea CI O o � O �\CCI 1 A rs;a I le-No Q 1,*1% a ; C a -"at S \ N �_ I d �, n a.t7 O '� O rn ' ' 3 z9i 3 ' CS itt o 31 i 1 cn 14N � 1\1• 72 G Zi x \ r"\ � \z aj r- °� '° \ \ \,/`fir ej -4 gnaw ,\ �� .�/ e � I >C�Y 1' \ m off` •\'^�J '� \ M F6' Q ' >>rr z3y \ _ \ m'' r- x i Z. E ' m o \m�� ' ID \ , Z ........001;z4.611-...„......N. e.2ao 1:1.4,40:0 I N 89'3e.i4);, w ago' \ 4'n.•'ea'u" \ ` \ \ sr s il 4 n1 �-00 rCt �70 ------,,,%N. \ r � \ \ �o� \ \ \ r c.) z \ S S ,� <cn pz i o t 1. E .64,51g; m \ �c � � oz z€ � zA�a °� O \-iC� N2 a5 I=mo r~xt ):.QQ�9 ---..„...... \ m "y G• - jpmoz mp \ To ° A r a , a s m 2m c 2 "+.. CO ZE SAN ' Lt �, SECTION LINE J zn z I ETA. E HiGmuA.,, 'r� oeuji EXIST. 4T.-MIN BAN.Of� MITAC7r1 Offsite drainage from the west will be diverted to the north of the site by a swale constructed along the west side , of the project. This swell will be designed to carry as a minimum the 25-year, 1-hour storm (State's present interpretation of Solid Waste Regulations) . Onsite drainage which has the potential of being contaminated by the composting operations will be collected in swales which divert runoff to a surface stormwater runoff containment and evaporation area. In particular, runoff from the paved areas of the site will be collected. Figure 3 . 1-1 shows the proposed routing for these swales. Drainage from areas of the site which do not have the potential of being contaminated by the composting operations will sheet flow to the northeast and down the access road from highway 119. The Surface Stormwater Runoff Containment and Evaporation Area is a flat, shallow grassed area from which there is no stormwater outlet. Stormwater collecting in this area leaves by evaporation. The area is to be sized to hold the 100-year, 24- hour storm. As shown by Figure 3 .1-1, the containment and evaporation area is located in the northeast corner of the site. Stormwater runoff from building roofs will be collected in an un- derground piping system which will discharge to the St. Vrain River. This underground piping system which will consist of reinforced concrete pipe with manholes at pipe connections, changes in direction, and other appropriate points. The pipe will be sized for a 100-year, 24-hour storm in order that the system does not overflow and overload the containment and evaporation area. The outfall to the St. Train River will be rip-rap. No other drainage other than roof water runoff will be carried by this piping system. Weld County does not have published drainage criteria. Consequently, the drainage design criteria published by the City of Longmont will be used as the design basis of this project (except as noted above) . 3.3 UTILITIES Power for the composting facility will be obtained from the Union Rivial Electric Association. New service facilities will need to be extended to the site. The extension of electric service should be coordinated with Dorothy Ruggles, Dept. Head; Union Rural Electric Association; P.O. Box 929 ; Brighton, Colorado 80601 (303/659-0551) . An existing telephone service line to the entrance building of the landfill runs along the east edge of the access road to the landfill. A new service line will be needed to the operations building. For telephone engineering information contact Dennis • Smith, U.S. West, Boulder (303)/441-7161) . 3-3 l QCC8z^ A Public Service gas main is located in the Highway 119 right-of- way. Extension of a gas service to the compost facility is not required. Instead a propane tank will be provided for heating the operations building. Potable water will need to be obtained from the Left Hand Water Supply Company, P.O. Box 210, Niwot, Colorado, 80544 (303/652- 2188) . The water company has a 1 1/4-inch water main on the north side of highway 119. It is believed that a 1-inch service line was bored under the highway to serve the vacant building just north of the proposed site. If this is so, then that serv- ice may also be able to serve the compost facility and a new crossing of Highway 119 will not be needed. Requirements for connecting to the Left Hand Water Supply Company system will be conveyed in response to a "Request For Top Consideration" which must be submitted by the City of Longmont. An existing 12-inch PVC Saint Vrain Sanitation District sanitary sewer is in place to serve the compost facility operations building, a new 8-inch PVC sanitary sewer will be constructed down the access road to the landfill to the south side of Highway 119. Because the invert of the existing sanitary sewer is nearly at the same elevation as the ground surface on the south side of Highway 119, the new sanitary sewer will need to be constructed eastward along Highway 119. It is anticipated that the sanitary sewer will need to parallel highway 119 for approximately 600 feet before a jack and bore crossing of Highway 119 can be made. The Saint Vrain Sanitation District has requested that the new 8- inch PVC sanitary sewer be constructed deep enough to allow the property east of the proposed site to be served. Design of this new sanitary sewer should be coordinated with Lee Lawson, Dis- trict Manager, St. Vrain Sanitation District, 600 K£mbark, Longmont, Colorado (303/776-9570) . 3-4 9c_'0524 4.0 PRELIMINARY EQUIPMENT LIST 4.1 QUMP TRUCKS f Dump trucks will be used to haul sludge cake from the City of Longmont wastewater treatment plant to the composting facility. These trucks are to be single axle type dump trucks with a 6 cubic yard capacity. Their GVW rating should be between 28,000 and 33,000 pounds. The dump body will be approximately 10 feet long and fitted with a cover. Trucks will be purchased by the City through City Fleet Purchase. 4.2 =cum UNITS Two SSI Model 500 (or equal) mixing units are provided to obtain a homogeneous blend of sludge cake and recycle material. These units are manufactured by Sludge Systems, Inc. of Long Lake, MN. Each unit is to be self contained, complete with 60 HP, 3 phase, 440 volt electric motor driven hydraulic drive, and mounted in a stationary position. The mixing box shall be equipped with a means of weighing material as it is placed into the mixing unit. Mixed material will be discharged from the SSI unit into a small pile beside the mixer. Because the mixer is one of the key pieces of equipment in the composting process, and is not avail- able locally, two units will be provided (one as a backup) to in- sure uninterrupted performance of the composting facility. 4.3 ZOADERS Material is moved around the composting facility by means of a bucket loader. This will be a Caterpillar 950E Wheel Loader (or equal) fitted with a 6 cubic yard bucket. To extend the reach of the loader, an ejector type bucket will be used. Because dried compost can be dusty, the loader will be fitted with a heated and air-conditioned cab. Also, since loaders can be rented locally, only one loader is to be provided as part of the equipment for this facility. To move material from the sludge transfer enclosure to a mixing unit, one Bob-Cat Model 980 (or equal) skidsteer loader will be provided. This loader will be fitted with a 2 C.Y. bucket. To aid in clean-up around the compost facility, one Bob-Cat Model 743 (or equal) skidsteer loader will be provided. 4-1 13C 0824 5.0 PRELIMINARY COST OPINION This opinion of probable cost is for the composting facility as presently envisioned. Economic conditions at the time of bidding, which cannot be predicted, will impact actual construc- tion cost. Land (Including legal fees, appraisal, closing costs, easements) 11.0 Acres @ $11,000/Acre $121,000 Composting/Curing Buildings Superstructure $565,000 Drilled Pier Foundation $295,000 Pavement (10,385 S.Y. @ $8.30/S.Y. ) $122,000 Electrical $201,000 $1,183,000 Mixing/Storage Buildings Superstructure $ 56,000 Drilled Pier Foundation $104,000 Blowers/Filter Pile $ 65,000 Pavement $ 10,000 Electrical $ 18.000 $253,000 Aeration Equipment Composting Fans (24 @ $6500) $156,000 Curing Fans (8 @ $8000) $ 64,000 Roof Ventilator Fans (9 @ $6000) $ 54,000 Controls $100,000 Aeration Piping $ 75.000 $449,000 Sitework Grading & Drainage Improvements $ 83,000 Evaporation Pond $ 15,000 Seed & Mulch $ 2,000 Landscaping $ 15,000 Paving $138,000 Access Road Reconstruction $ 78,000 Fencing $ 5,000 Weather Station $ 10,000 Site Electrical $ 20,40Q $366,000 Equipment Loader (1 @ $175,000) $175,000 SSI Mixer (2 @ $60,500) $121,000 Skidsteer - Small (1 @ $18,000) $ 18,000 Skidsteer - Large (1 @ $54,000) $ 54,000 $368,000 5-1 .ecesz4 Operations Building Building S103,000 Electrical $ 23,000 Water System (Incl. Fire Prot. ) $ 23,000 Sanitary Sewer $ 83,000 Jack & Bore $ 36,000 Utility Service Connection/Tap Fees $ 12,000 Furnishings S 15, Q00 $295,000 Sub-Total $3,035,000 10$ Contingency $ 303, 5.00 GRAND TOTAL $3,338,500 The above GRAND TOTAL compares with a composting facility total of S2,454,480 estimated by the Facilities Plan. However, the Facilities Plan did not include an operations building with of- fsite utility extensions and did not consider the purchase of ad- ditional land or reconstruction of the access road to the landfill. r 5-2 200824 PLAN OF OPERATION FOR CITY OF LONGMONT SOLIDS HANDLING PROJECT January, 1990 1 • PREPARED BY: RBD, Inc. CDM, Inc. 2900 South College Ave. 1331 17th St. , Suite 1200 Fort Collins, CO 80525 Denver, Colorado 80202 (303) 226-4955 Job No. 213-006 EPA Project C-08-0532 sceszg TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. SCHEDULE OF ACTIVITIES 3 III. ADMINISTRATION AND STAFFING PLAN 9 A. Organizational Structure 9 B. Staff Requirements and Responsibilities 9 C. Work Schedule 12 D. Staffing Schedule 13 E. Personnel Issues 14 ' IV. COMMUNICATION 22 V. FACILITY OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 27 PROGRAM AND MANUAL A. Operational Strategy And Unit Process Control 27 B. Maintenance Management System 30 C. Emergency Response Plan 32 D. Laboratory Requirements 33 E. Operation And Maintenance (0&M) Manual 34 F. Dynamic Policy And Procedures Manual 37 G. Operation During Construction And Start-up 38 H. Start-up Process Control Testing 41 VI. START-UP TRAINING AND ASSISTANCE SERVICES 42 A. Staff Training Program 42 B. Safety Training Program 45 C. Consulting Engineer Services 46 VII. EXPENSES AND REVENUES 48 A. Salaries 48 B. Operation And Maintenance Costs 48 C. Revenues 49 D. Project Costs 49 E. Funding Sources 49 F. . Budget Projection 49 2'fl!5Z/3 'SECTION I INTRODUCTION • The Plan of operation is prepared for the City of Longmont ad- ministration and management personnel to describe the programs essential to the proper functioning of the Solids Handling Project. Further, the Plan of Operation provides the groundwork necessary for the elements of the Solids Handling Project to be efficiently integrated with the operation of the existing was- tewater treatment facility. This Plan of Operation is the first part of a three-part program which will lead to the successful start=up and operation of the Solids Handling Project facilities. The other two parts are the Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Manual and Start-Up Assistance services provided by the consulting Engineer and Equipment Manufacturers. The purpose of this three-part program is to supplement the design and construction aspects of the new facilities with operation and management aspects. Each section which follows addresses a given area of management responsibility and provides information concerning management's role in fulfill- ing these responsibilities. Section II is a comprehensive Schedule of Activities which lists key events, their target dates for completion (both as a calendar time and as a percent of con- struction completion.) , and designates who is responsible for per- forming the task represented by the key event. This schedule is very important singe, upon revi.Qw and approval by the Colorad¢ Denartment of Health and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency It becomes a condition of the City's qo struction arant from the Federal government. The Solids Handling Project provides the sludge handling facilities recommended by the SQ.lids Management Study prepared by Black and Veatch, 1987 and as further detailed by the Preliminary Design Report prepared by COM and RBD in December 1988 and up- dated in September 1989. In particular, this project provides a new gravity thickner and associated pumping facilities and a belt filter press facility with chemical feed systems and related sludge handling equipment at the existing wastewater treatment plant. Also, a new aerated static pile composting facility is being constructed adjacent to the City's existing landfill. 1 a�+0524 1 4 Two construction contracts are to be awarded to build the facilities of the Solids Handling Project. One project titled "In-plant Improvements" deals with work at the existing treatment facility. The other project titled "Compost Facility" deals with the construction of the new compost facility. Each contract has a seperate set of project specifications and construction drawings. The following is an anticipated project schedule for administering each of these contracts: Anticipated Date Project In Plant Compost Task Improvements Facility Receive Bids Jan. 30, 1990 Jan. 17, 1990 Issue Notice of Award Feb. 27, 1990 Mar. 12, 1990 ' Receive Executed Contract Documents from Contractor Mar. 13, 1990 Mar. 26, 1990 Issue Notice to Proceed Mar. 14, 1990 Mar. 27, 1990 Preconstruction Conference Mar. 19, 1990 Mar. 30, 1990 Contractor Schedules Due Mar. 30, 1990 Apr. 1'1, 1990 Substantial Completion Dec. 9, 1990 Dec. 25, 1990 Final Completion Feb. 7, 1991 Feb. 23, 1991 End of One-Year Correction Period Dec. 9, 1991 Dec. 25, 1991 0 2 U0052 .SECTION II SCHEDULE OF ACTIVITIES Responsible Section rev Event Party Reference Jan. , 1990 Jan. 15 - Begin process to formally create solids handling group City III-B Jan. 17 - Receive Compost Bids City Proj . Specs. Jan. 30 - Receive In-plant Bids City Proj . Specs. Jan. 30 - Construction Phase Engineering Services Begin Engineer VI-C Jan. 31 - Submit Final Plan of °per- ation to State for Review State/EPA I Feb. , 1990 _ Feb. 12 - Assign/Hire Solids Handling Operations Supervisor (SHOS) City III-D Feb. 15 - Begin Development of Staff Training Program SHOS VI-A Feb. 15 - Begin Development of Safety Training Program SHOS VI-B Feb. 15 - Begin Development of Emergency Response Plan SHOS V-C Feb. 15 - Begin Development of Main- tenance Management System SHOS V-B Feb. 27 - Issue In-Plant Notice of Award City Proj . Specs. March, 1990 (0% Completion of Construction) Mar. 1 - Final Plan of Operation Approval State/EPA I Mar. 12- Issue Compost Notice of Award City Proj . Spec Mar. 13 - Receive Executed Contract Documents From In-Plant Contractor In-Plant Project Contractor Specs Mar. 14 - Issue In-Plant Notice To Proceed City Proj . Spec Mar. 14 - Assign/Hire Resident Engineer Engineer VI-C Mar. 19 - In-Plant Preconstruction Conference Engineer Proj . Spec Mar. 26- Receive Executed Contract Documents From Compost Contractor Compost Proj . Spec Contractor Mar. 27- Issue Compost Notice to Proceed City Proj . Spec Mar. 30- Compost Preconstruction Conference Engineer Proj . Spec Mar. 30 - In-Plant Contractor Schedules Due In-Plant Contractor Proj . Spec 3 .4,COR A April, 1990 April 2 - Begin O&M manual preparation Engineer V-E • April 11- Compost Contractor Schedules Due Compost Contractor Proj . Spec May, 1990 May 25 - Draft O&M Manual Materials Due from Contractors In-Plant & V-E Compost Contractors June, 1990 Jun. 1 - Begin to investigate use Of new City maintenance management system. SHOS V-8 Jun. 15 - Submit Draft O&M Manual Doc- uments to State for review Engineer V-E Jun. 15 - Submit Draft of Emergency Response Plan to State for review. SHOS V-C Jun. 15 - Submit Draft of Safety Training Program to State for review. SHOS. VI-B Jun. 15 - Submit Draft Plan for Maintenance Management System to State for review. SHOS V-B Jun. 15 - Submit Draft Plan for Staff Training Program to State for review, SHOS VI-A July, 1990 (50% Completion of Construction) July 2 - Receive State Approval of Drafts State . July 2 - Begin Developing Maintenance Management System Forms SHOS v-B July 16 - City Purchase Compost Fac- ility Computer Control Equipment. City V-G August, 1990 Aug. 1 - Begin Development of Main- tenance Schedule Sheets SHOS v-B Aug. 20 - city Begin Programming Compost control Computer. City V-G September, 1990 Sept. 1 - Prepare Draft Dynamic Policy & Procedures Manual SHOS V-F Sept. 14- Final O&M Manual Materials Due from Contractors In-Plant v-E & Compost Contractors 4 SCOS2A1 . Sept. 17- Begin Assigning/Hiring Solids Handling Group Operators City III-B Sept. 17- Begin work to identiy and obtain all necessary safety material and equipment SHOS VI-B Sept.21 - Detailed Belt Press Testing Procedure due from Contractor In-Plant Contractor V-H October, 1990 Oct. 1 - Complete Emergency Response • Plan SHOS V-C Oct. 1 - Complete Maintenance Management forms and Schedule Sheets SHOS V-B Oct. 1 - Begin Start-Up And Operations Phase Engineering Services Engineer VI-C . Oct. 5 - Approve Belt Press test procedure Engineer/SHOS V-H Oct. 8 - Arrange for polymer for belt press testing SHOS v-H Oct. 10 - Arrange with Longmont Laboratory for belt press testing SHOS V-H Oct. 15 - Submit Final O&M Manual Documents to State for Review Engineer V-E Oct. 15- Submit Final Plan for Staff Training Program to State for Review SHOS VI-A Oct. 15 - Submit Final Safety Training Program to State for Review SHOS VI-B Oct. 15 - Submit Final Plan for . Maintenance Management System to State for Review SHOS v-B Oct. 22 - Fill Solids Handling Group Operator Positions City III-D Oct. 22 - Begin Assigning/Hiring Solids Handling Group Mechanic City III-B Oct. 23 - Dewatering Fundamentals Workshop Engineer/SHOS VI-A Oct. 24- Begin Equipment Training by Factory Representatives In-Plant Proj . Spec Contractor Oct. 31 - Complete Identification and Stocking of In-Plant Safety Supplies SHOS VI-B November, 1990 (808 Completion of Construction) Nov. 1 - Arrange for Composting Start-up Amendment SHOS v-G Nov. _ 1 - Fill Solids Handling Group Mechanic Position City III-D . Nov. 2 - Group Organization Workshop Engineer/SHOS VI-A Nov. 5 - City Purchase Dump Truck City V-G 5 ter` s2, • Nov. 7 - Begin 30 Day Performance Testing of Belt Filter Presses In-Plant Contractor V-H Nov. 15 - Final O&M Manual Approval State/EPA V-E December, 1990 (90% Completion of Construction) Dec. 3 - Begin Equipment Training By Factory Representatives Compost Proj . Spec Contractor Dec. 3 - Deliver small load of start-up amendment to compost facility for equipment testing City V-G Dec. 7 - Complete 30 Day Performance Test of Belt Filter Press In-Plant V-H Contractor Dec. 9 - In-Plant Work Substantial ' Completion In-Plant Proj . Spec Contractor Dec. 10 - Solids Handling Group Operators Tour Similar Compost Facilities Engineer/SHOS VI-A Dec. 17 - Loader & Skid-Steer deliveries Compost Proj . Spec Contractor Dec. 25 - Compost Work Substantial Completion Compost Proj . Spec Contractor Dec. 26 - Purchase compost facility small tools, lab equipment, and Operations Building Furnishings. SHOS V-G Dec. 31 - City Landfill Closes City V-G January, 1991 Jan. 2 - Implement Maintenance Man- agement Program at In-Plant Facilities SHOS V-B Jan. 2 - Conduct Tour of In-Plant Facilities with Police and Fire Department Personnel SHOS V-C Jan. 2 - Conduct Tour of In-Plant Facilities with City Risk Manager SHOS VI-B Jan. 4 - Receive Record Drawing Materials from Contractors In-Plant & Proj . Spec Compost Contr. Jan. 4 - Complete identification and stocking of compost facility safety supplies. SHOS VI-B Jan. 7 - Implement maintenance management program at Compost Facility. SHOS V-B Jan. 7 - Begin Installing Compost Control Computer City V-G Jan. 10- Conduct Tour of Compost Facilities with Police and 6 4,",e n - a o v • • Fire Dept. Personnel. SHOS v-C Jan. 11- Conduct Tour of Compost • Facility with City Risk Manager SHOS VI-B Jan. 18 - Provide Record Drawings to City Engineer VI-C Jan. 21- Health & Safety Workshop Engineer/SHOS VI-A February, 1991 (100% Completion of Construction) Feb. 1 - Composing Fundamental Workshop Engineer/SHOS VI-A Feb. 1 - Deliver Start-up Amendment to Compost Facility SHOS V-G Feb. 7 - In-Plant Work Final Completion In-Plant Proj . Spec Contractor Feb. 11- Begin Practicing Compost Techniques SHOS VI-A Feb. 23- Compost Control Computer Operational City V-G Feb. 23 - Compost Work Final Completion Compost • Contractor Proj . Spec March, 1991 March 1 - Implement Safety Training Program for Solids Handling Group SHOS VI-8 March 1 - Emergency Operational • Procedures Workshop Engineer/SHOS VI-A March a - Begin Composting SHOS V-G April, 1991 April 1 - Finalize Dynamic Policy & Procedures Manual SHOS V-F September, 1991 Sept. 15- Begin one-year Review of 0&M Manual Documents Engineer V-E October, .1991 Oct. 15 - Update O&M Manual Documents Based on First Year Oper- ating Experience. Engineer V-E Oct. 15 - Update Dynamic Policy and Procedures Manual. SHOS V-F November, 1991 Nov. 19 - Begin One-Year Performance Certification Review of In-Plant Work. Engineer VI-C 7 ,r ,082n December, 1991 • Dec. 1 - Begin One-Year Performance Certification Review of Compost Work Engineer VI-C Dec. 9 - Provide In-Plant One-Year Performance Certification Engineer vI-C Dec. 24- Provide Compost One-Year Performance Certification Engineer VI-C Note: % construction completion based upon amount paid to Contractor. SHOS - Solids Handling Operations Supervisor • OP 8 r n-, • SECTION III ADMINISTRATION AND STAFFING PLAN A. Organizational Structure A diagram of the existing organizational structure for the City of Longmont is provided by Figure III-1. The solids handling project facilities are to be staffed by a Solids Handling Group which will be created from already existing positions at the treatment plant. In particular, the Solids Handling Group will be responsible for Operation and Maintenance of the belt filter press, the composting facility, and overseeing the existing con- tract hauling of solids for land application. Figure III-2 is an organizational diagram showing how the Solids Handling Group fits into the wastewater treatment plant's organizational structure. B. Staff Requirements and Responsibilities The existing wastewater treatment plant is presently disposing of solids created by the wastewater treatment process through con- tracting with private haulers for land application. As a result of implementation of this Solids Handling Project, other methods will be available to handle and dispose of these solids. More op- tions will allow for a more reliable, efficient, and easier method to manage solids handling. It will not result in in- creased staffing requirements. Instead, the Solids Handling Group identified in figure III-2 will be created by redefining existing positions at the wastewater plant as solids handling group positions. The position of Solids Handling Operator Super- visor (SHOS) will be created by eliminating an Operator position. This transfer of personnel can be summarized as follows: Staff Current Proposed Number position Number Plant Solids Handling Grouo Operations Supervisor 1 1 - Solids Handling Operations Supervisor 0 - 1 Operators 11 6 4 Mechanics 7 6 1 ann.. Total Positions 19 13 6 9 On" eZi X • 21 N yy I R i ifil a 11111 ) J .. �- ss d 111 W tl �� # �� D it- ill 4 � F z 11111 . J ' a � � i ix o v)z Y z = o Q w ( g I iii o _ u W � u_ o D a -4.--. Q N V U Q � �f W l^ a cc 1111 , ` O a. �.� a. y a �a` W 11 — < y mow.. � W id yC & « 'YYy u r if 1 11 rr � q 111 N iiiilll , 1111111 008 24 10 • WATER QUALITY WATER r UUgRATORY -4QUALITY • • SUPERVISOR DIRECTOR A TREATMENT PLANT OPERATIONS MANAGER OPERATIONS MAINTENANCE memrsTRATAT SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR AIDE SOPLANTLIDS MMHG PT OPERATORS MEC�CS ADIMISISnIATIVE OPERATORS SUPERVISOR SOLIDS HANDLING - SOLIDS HANDLING GROUP OPERATORS SOUDS HANDLING MECHANIC FORMAL COMMUNICATION ----- OPERATIONAL COMMUNICATION WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT AND SOLIDS HANDLING ORGANIZATION FIGURE 111-2 11 9€082/1 RBD.INC • A statement of responsibilities and qualifications for each posi- tion identified as part of the Solids Handling Group is included• at the end of this section. C. Work Schedule It is anticipated that all Solids Handling Group employees will work from 7: 00 a .m. to 3 : 30 p.m. , Monday through Friday inclusive. The time between 11:30 and noon will be for lunch. The added thickner will allow for sludge storage on holidays, weekends, and during times of mechanical breakdown. Because was- tewater solids handling processes are generally of a "batch" nature, working in shifts is not warranted because sludge storage facilities will be available. When the Solids Handling Group is not on duty, the dewatering equipment at the treatment plant is shut off, heavy equipment is safely parked, and the composting ' process is being monitored with a computer. A telephone alarm system is provided for emergency conditions such as fire but the composting process proceeds at a slow enough pace that process i control can be easily accomplished within the above work hours. In the future, when sludge production increases, a six or seven day solids handling operation may be utilized. This is also an option for peak sludge production times such as in April and May when sloughing of the trickling filter biofilm occurs. Typical daily activities of the Solids Handling Group would be as follows: Solids Handling Operations Supervisor - Planning, management, and • analysis of solids handling needs and performance. Operator Position 1 - Operate filter press at treatment plant. Operator Position 2 - Operate truck to carry dewatered . sludge cake between treatment plant and composting facility. Assist at treatment plant and compost facility. Operator Position 3 - Operate mixer at compost facility. Operator Position 4 - Operate loader at compost facility to load mixer, carry newly mixed material to compost pile, carry previously composted material to curing pile, and other material movement operations. Or if, 12 • Mechanic - Repair solids handling equipment and perform preventive main- • tenance tasks. Because solids handling operations are a "batch" type operation, time-off for holidays is not a problem. The division of work noted above has sufficient slack that normal time-off for vacations, training, or sickness can be accommodated. The solids handling operations supervisor will need to coordinate the scheduling Of vacation and training time to equitably disperse the added work load among the operators. In addition, the solids handling operations supervisor can fill in during times of unex- pected sickness of an operator. Existing plant mechanics can fill in when the solids handling mechanic is absent. Likewise, the solids handling mechanic can aid the plant mechanics in their work to cover for an absent plant mechanic. D. Staffing Schedule The Solids handling Group will need to be formed before comple- tion of construction. In particular, the Solids Handling Opera- tions Supervisor (SHOS) should be assigned shortly after the start of construction. The solids handling operators are needed approximately 50 days prior to substantial completion of the in- plant work. The solids handling mechanic is needed approximately 40 days prior to in-plant work substantial completion. This schedule will allow these individuals to become well acquainted with the equipment and systems they will be expected to operate upon completion of construction. During construction, the Solids Handling Operations Supervisor (SHos) will be needed to aid the Contractor during appropriate stages of construction. He will also be the primary party responsible for developing a Staff Training Program, Safety Training Program, Emergency Response Plan, and Maintenance Management System. The City has developed a "Dynamic Policy & Procedures Manual" which they use at their other treatment facilities to guide plant operators in the day to day operations of various unit processess and operations. Preparation of a draft manual of this sort will be a responsiblity of the SHOS. He will also assist the Engineer in preparing 0&M Manuals for the new facilities. As construction nears completion, the SHOS will be responsible for squiring City purchased safety material and equipment; coordinating City responsibilities for belt filter press testing; aquisition of composting amendment material, small tools, lab equipment, and operations building furnishings; and finally conducting facility tours with the City Risk Manager and with police and fire department personnel. Solids handling group operators must be available to run the belt filter press equipment for the In-Plant Contractor's 30 day per- formance test. Just prior to the start of the performance test, the Solids Handling Group operators will need to attend workshops on the Solids Handling Group organization and dewatering fundamentals. Also, Factory Representatives for fn-Plant equip- ment will begin their training sessions just prior to the start of the performance test. After the belt press performance test, there will be a brief time-period in which the operators can 13 areS9ea .r . train to prepare for start-up of the composting facility. The solids handling group mechanic must be available by the start of the 30 day belt filter press performance test. If possible, the mechanic should also be available to attend the in-plant training sessions presented by Factory Representatives. As outlined in part B of this Section, new staff positions are not being created. Instead, already existing staff positions are being redefined to create a solids handling group. Consequently, the filling of solids handling group staff positions does not necessarily mean that new personnel will need to be hired. The following is a schedule for filling the solids handling group staff positions either by formally assigning existing personnel to the group or hiring personnel to fill a vacancy: January 15, 1990 Begin process to formally create Solids Handling Group February 12, 1990 Assign/Hire Solids Handling Operations Supervisor (SHOS) September 17, 1990 Begin Assigning/Hiring Solids Handling Group Operator's October 22, 1990 Fill Solids Handling Group Operator Positions Begin Assigning/Hiring Solids Handling Group Mechanic November 1, 1990 Fill Solids Handling Group Mechanic Position j E. Personnel Issues Personnel rules for all employees of the City of Longmont are contained in the City Code of Longmont, Title 1, Chapter 22. All new staff positions or vacancies are advertised and posted by the city Personnel Department. Major personnel disputes and grievances are also handled by the Personnel Department. Minor complaints or staff problems are first directed to the appropriate supervisor for resolution. Dis- putes only go to the Personnel Department if an "in-house" solution cannot be reached. 14 .d.082/1 i SOLIDS HANDLING GROUP I STATEMENTS OF PERSONNEL DUTIES AND QUALIFICATIONS i I I i I ereSZA1 15 mommems • SOLUS HANDLZr OPERATIQNS SUPERVISOR DESCRIPTION OF WORK Assigns, supervises and reviews the work of the solids handling staff of the City of Longmont wastewater treatment plant. Analyzes and reports on solids handling procedures, including dewatering, digestion, land application and composting. Assures that solids handling functions are performed in accordance with local, State and Federal requirements. Administers contracts for hauling and land applying sludge. Oversees monitoring programs for sludge, soil and crops. Works under the direction of Was- tewater Plant Operations Supervisor and coordinates solids han- dling functions with Laboratory Supervisor, Wastewater Main- tenance Supervisor, Water Quality engineering and Water Quality Director. SUPERVISION RECEZVZD AND EXEC;SED Under the overall direction of the Operations Supervisor of the wastewater treatment plant, this position is responsible for the direct supervision of solids handling operations and maintenance personnel. Other responsibilities include: Managing daily opera- tion of sludge dewatering and aerated static pile compost facilities, daily administration of contracts with sludge haulers for land application and planning and supervising compliance monitoring for process operation, sludge quality and sludge disposal. EXAMPLES or DUTIES Duties may include, but are not limited to, the following: As- '.n the development and implementation of goals, objectives, and procedures related to solids handling ; assign, and supervise employees in the operation of solids han- c • _ _ittes ; maintain surveillance of the operating ef- fi<_ _ : sludge dewatering and composting; supervise, train and e'-c.. . a subordinates; maintain records and prepare reports regarding operation of sludge dewatering and composting and the quality of finished/disposed sludges or compost; suggest methods of improving solids handling and disposal efficiency; coordinate the collection of samples from land application sites; coordinate solids monitoring and testing activities with the Longmont Water Quality Laboratory; coordinate solids handling functions with wastewater plant maintenance personnel to assure proper and efficient operation of solids handling equipment and quality control systems; coordinate operational changes and ex- periments with Operations Supervisor and Water Quality engineer- ing personnel; oversee the production and utilization of finished compost; order supplies and materials as needed for proper opera- tion of solids handling operations; prepare O&M cost estimates; assist in development of replacement equipment specifications; assist in -budget preparation and administration; respond to emer- gencies on an on-call basis 24 hours per day, seven days per week; respond to citizen inquiries, foster good public relations and respond to complaints; make critical decisions to resolve emergency conditions resulting from solids handling system mal- functions or adverse weather conditions; keep informed of current 16 oco 7r2� and proposed regulatory requirements for the treatment and dis- posal of wastewater solids and keep wastewater plant Operations Supervisor informed of the possible effects of such requirements on future plant operations; perform other duties related to operation and management of solids handling as assigned. NALIFICATIONS Knowledge of: Operation and maintenance of wastewater treatment plant solids handling equipment, including composting equipment; sewage and sludge treatment processes and chemical and bac- teriological characterisitics and sewer and sludge; standard methods of sampling and analyzing wastewater and sludge; standard methods of sampling and analyzing wastewater and sludge; automated equipment associated with atment and solids handling operations; basic hydraulics, inel- g flow and' volume measuring devices; pumps, mixers, blowers, ...j other equipment related to wastewater and wastewater soli. t. handling; basic engineering principles and practices as they relate to wastewater treatment and solids handling; occupational hazards and standard safety practices and precautions involved in wastewater treatment and solids handling operations ; principles and practices of supervision, training and performance evaluation. Ability to: Plan, schedule and assign work in wastewater solids handling operation and maintenance; supervise, train and evaluate subordinates ; prepare and monitor operating budget; prepare reports and maintain records; communicate clearly and concisely, both orally and in writing; use personal computer and standard ( software to track and monitor solids handling operations; work wit . :tory, Engineering, and other departments of water 0, _-ision to achieve efficient and effective solids han- < _=dtion. _:;CE OF OUALIFICAZIONE Any combination of education and experience that would provide the required knowledge and abilities is qualifying, subject to the following minimum requirements: Experience: Four years of experience in the operation and main- tenance of a wastewater treatment plant, with an emphasis on solids handling and disposal, including supervisory experience or experience in working with State and Federal regulatory require- ments for solids handling or wastewater treatment. Education: Equivalent to the completion of the twelfth grade supplemented by college-level academic course work in chemistry or biology and specialized training in wastewater solids treat- ment and disposal. i' License or Certificate: Possession of a Class A Wastewater Treatment. Plant Operator's Certificate issued by the State of Colorado and possession of a valid Colorado Driver's License. 17 or net, OUALIFICATIONS Knowledge of: Operation and maintenance of wastewater treatment plant solids handling equipment; sewage and sludge treatment processes and chemical and bacteriological characteristics of sewage sludge; standard methods of sampling and analyzing was- tewater and sludge; the properties of the chemical compounds, scientific principles, and the laboratory procedures used in was- tewater treatment; operational and safety regulations pertaining to wastewater treatment Solids handling operations; standard principles of hydraulics; and principles of personnel management. Ability to: Perform the most difficult' and complex duties re- lated to wastewater solids handling and composting operation and maintenance; recognize and react to process changes and demands; operate heavy equipment; use personal computer and standard ' software to tract and monitor solids handling operations; and provide lead supervision and training to lower level personnel. BVIDENCE OF OUALIF:CATIONS Any combination of experience and education that would likely provide the required knowledge and abilities is qualifying, sub- ject to the following minimum requirements: Experience: Four years of experience performing water and/or wastewater treatment operations. j Ed' -_ ion: Equivalent to the completion of the twelfth grade si _emented by academic course work in chemistry, biology and r _nematics. License or Certificate: Possession of a Class B or C Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator's Certificate issued by the State of Colorado and possession of a valid Class B Colorado Driver' s License. Srea2a 15 SOLIDS HANDLING MECHANIC DESCRIPTION OF WORK Perform skilled and semi-skilled work related to the maintenance, repair, upkeep, and operation of the city of Longmont Wastewater solids handling equipment for dewatering, sludge digestion, land application and composting. SUPERVISION RECEIVED AND EXE$CISED Immediate supervision is provided by the Solids Handling Operators. Technical or Functional supervision may be provided by higher level Plant Mechanic personnel: EXAMPLES OF DUTIES . Duties may include, but are not limited to, the following: Es- tablish and maintain a regular inspection schedule of solids han- dling facilities; perform a wide variety of maintenance and repair tasks in the servicing of the solids handling facility equipment; perform maintenance and repair of heavy equipment, puzIpa , fans, motors, drive systems, electrical equipment, sensors, and chemical feeders; calibrate feeder systems and other equipment such as flow meters, pumps, fans, and valves; perform a variety of preventive maintenance tasks on mechanical and electrical equipment including loaders , trucks , material handling, and dewatering equipment; assist in the design and fabrication of a variety of tools, pumps, valves, and piping systems; purchase and obtain authorized supplies and materials; inspect and monitor electronic measuring devices; train and as- sist less experienced personnel; maintain up-to-day and accurate records and logs of operating conditions of equipment and main- tenance work performed perform carpentry, masonry,, and electri- cal duties as required; skillfully use a variety of tools and equipment including pipe cutters and threaders , welding equipment, drills and grinders, and electrical test instruments; maintain and service tool and equipment used in solids handling facility maintenance; perform snow removal duties as required; -nrform related duties as assigned. "?CATIONS Kno, c, of: Methods, procedures, tools, parts, and materials used in : e operation and maintenance of mechanical and electri- cal equipment and machinery used for handling, treating, and dis- posal of wastewater solids; safe and efficient work practices in- volving complex electrical, electronic and mechanical equipment; and routine record keeping methods and procedures. Ability to: Perform routine and preventive maintenance tasks on electrical and mechanical equipment; identify mechanical problems and recommend effective corrective courses of actions; perform maintenance work involving physical stamina; read and interpret blueprints, electrical schematics, construction drawings, and maps; maintain routine logs and records; perform work in emer- gency situations as necessary; work with considerable indepen- dence and initiative; use power and hand tools in repair and • maintenance tasks; and train and assist less experienced personnel. gvIDENgg OF OVALIFICATIONS Any combination of experience and education that would likely provide the required knowledge and abilities is qualifying, sub- ject to the following minimum requirements: Experience: Three years of increasingly responsible experience in the maintenance and repair of electrical and mechanical machinery typical to that found at water and/or wastewater treat- ment facilities. Education: Equivalent to completion of the twelfth grade. License or Certificate: Possession of a valid Colorado Driver's License. 21 s e324/� • SECTION IV COMMUNICATION Serious problems can develop with equipment and/or process per- formance if communication is inadequate. For this reason com- munication is emphasized in the plan of operation by making it a Section unto itself. Generally speaking there are four key levels within the City structure where formal communication must take place: between City Council and the Director Water/ Was- tewater Utilities; between the Water Quality Director and the Treatment Plant Operations Manager; between the Operations Super- visor and the Solids Handling Operations Supervisor; and between the Solids Handling Operations Supervisor and the Water Quality Laboratory Supervisor. It is understood that there will always be informal communication at all levels. It should also be noted that effective communication is the responsibility of all personnel. CITY COUNCIL - DIRECTOR wATEE/WASTEWATER UTILITIES Formal communication between the City Council and the Director Water/Wastewater Utilities can be accomplished through directives . The reverse communication can be accomplished through written and oral presentations to the City Council and through the Annual Water/wastewater Utilities report. At each regular City Council meeting the Director Water/Wastewater Utilities should report on the status of the budget, personnel, and any other items of special interest. The annual report should be prepared at least 3 months prior to budget preparation. It shou'_.d contain a separate detailed section describing the s•a' ,ndling aspects of the wastewater treatment facility for t: ..sr. A suggested outline of the contents of such a solids hanc:a ng section is as follows: Annual Water/Wastewater Utilities Report WASTEWATER SOLIDS HANDLING 1. SOLIDS HANDLING AND DISPOSAL CAPACITY 2. OPERATIONS a. Staffing b. Equipment c. Financial Data d. Studies and Improvements 3 . PERFORMANCE HISTORY a. Sludge Production/Thickener Performance b. Digester Usage c. Digested Sludge Monthly Analysis For Land Application d. Volume of Sludge Land Applied e. Belt Filter Press Performance f. Composting g. Finish Compost Analysis h. Finish Compost Utilization 22 0(.0.992,3 4. EXISTING AND PROPOSED SOLIDS HANDLING REGULATIONS a. Existing Performance Standards b. Proposed Performance Standards c. Potential Impact of Proposed Standards To supplement the reports, the City Council should tour the solids handling facilities with the Director water/Wastewater Utilities at least once a year and preferably much more frequently. One tour could be made after the annual report has been submitted and before the next year's operating budget is adopted. This will provide the opportunity to see "first hand" what is going on and better understand the needs of the Solids Handling Group. WATER OUALI,TX DIRECTOR - TREATMENT PLAN' OPERATIONS MANAGER Formal communication between the water Quality Director and the Treatment Plant Operations Manager concerning the solids handling facilities should be established through a monthly written and oral report. An example written report is shown in Figure IV-1. The purpose of this report is to update the Water Quality Direc- tor on the operation and maintenance status and other needs. OPERATIONS SUPERVISOR - SOLIDS HANDLING OPERATIONS SUPERVISOR Formal communication between the Operations Supervisor and the Solids Handling Operations Supervisor should be in the form of i staff meetings and a weekly written report. An example :ten report is shown in Figure IV-2 . Attendence at staff j . .,stings should include the operations supervisor the solids han- dling operations supervisor, and lead plant and solids handling operators. Through these meetings the staff members can be in- formed of how current policies and proposed changes may affect them. These meetings can be an effective tool in keeping lines of communication open and operator morale high. The meetings should also be used to discuss current process control strategies, previous week's problems, and proposed process con- trol modifications. An example weekly staff meeting agenda is as follow: Proposed Staff Meeting Agenda 1. Discuss plant and solids handling facility performance for the previous week. 2. Discuss current process control strategy. 3 . Discuss any oranges that have been made or are proposed in the standard operation and maintenance procedures at the plant or the solids handling facilities. 4. Discuss activities of the wastewater treatment facility as a whole such as special studies being undertaken or solids disposal options. ( 5. Answer questions. 23 Cret.. es it;), ,C " r SOLIDS HANDLING OPERATIONS SUPERVISOR - WATER OVALZIX LABORATORX SUPERVISOR • r Formal communication between the Solids Handling Operations Su- pervisor and the Water Quality Laboratory Supervisor is as shown by the solid lines in Figure III-2. This line of communication should be followed when new or different laboratory tests are needed. On a routine basis, the operational lines of communica- tion shown by dashed lines in Figure III-2 should be followed. Should there be a conflict in laboratory work requested by the Operations supervisor or the Solids Handling Operations Supervisor, then the Water Quality Director will either resolve the conflict or set the priority for the work to be performed. The water Quality Laboratory Yias its own' computerized system for tr,::king and documenting samples and testing. This system should r adhered to. t t 1, 26 5.,COSztv • SECTION V FACILITIX OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PROGRAM AND MANUAL A. Operational Strategy And Unit Process Control The solids handling processes to be used as a result of this solids handling project include gravity sludge thickening, belt filter press dewatering, aerated static pile composting, and contract hauling of anaerobically digested sludge to land application sites. This combination of processes was developed to provide flexibility in wastewater sludge disposal while also meeting the disposal requirements established by the Colorado Department of Health. A general description of the monitoring and control strategy for each of these unit processes follows. A more detailed and specific discussion of the operation of each will be developed as part of the Operation and Maintenance Manual. Gravity Sludge Thickenina Gravity thickening is accomplished in a circular tank similar to a clarifier. Dilute sludge is feed at as con- stant a rate as possible into a center well and allowed to settle and compact. The thickened sludge is withdrawn from the bottom of the thickner and a continuous supernatant flow is returned to wastewater treatment plant headworks. The existing and new sludge thickeners may be operated in- dividually or simultaneously in a parallel mode. Flow of ;_udge to and from the thickeners will be controlled by -.ually adjusted valves and by pumps. Thickened sludge is ,7=ped either to the existing anaerobic digesters or to the belt filter presses in the new dewatering building. The su- pernatant will flow by gravity to the headworks pump station. Storage of sludge will be accomplished by allowing the sludge blanket in the thickener to increase. Sludge levels should be monitored and odor levels noted to avoid nuisance conditions. "Sweetening" water will' be pumped to the thickeners from the effluent splitter box on the east side of former No. 2 final clarifier during times that large amounts of sludge are being stored. Typical process control measurements and frequency are as follows: Measurement Frequency I , Volume Pumped to Thickener daily Thickened sludge total solids daily Thickened Sludge Volume Taken from Thickener daily Supernatant Suspended Solids daily Supernatant HOD twice weekly Belt Filter Press Dewatering • Thickened sludge from the gravity sludge thickeners will be pumped to the belt filter presses. Dewatering is achieved • by forcing the water from the sludge under high pressure by squeezing it between two porus belts. To aid in the dewatering process, a polymer is mixed with the thickened sludge just prior to the press. The belt filter presses are most effectively operated by personnel at the equipment rather than in a remote operations room. This allows for constant monitoring of belt speed and tension, polymer dosage, and general status of the press equipment. Key ad- justments to be made by the belt press operator to optimize performance are sludge feed rate, polymer type and feed rate, press belt speed and tension, and conditioner belt speed. Typical process control measurements and frequency are as follows: Measurement frevencv . Sludge Feed Rate (gpm) daily Sludge Feed Total Solids daily Polymer Feed Rate (gpm) daily Polymer Total Weight Used daily Dewatered Sludge Total Solids daily Weight Dewatered Sludge Produced daily Filtrate BOD twice weekly Filtrate flow rate (gpm) daily Filtrate total solids daily Filtrate Suspended Solids daily Press Belt Speed Setting daily ( Press Belt Tension Setting dail Conditioner Belt Speed Setting daily Aerated Statj.c Pile_comoostine Dewatered, undigested sludge cake will be trucked to the composting facility where it will be mixed with previously composted material. The aerated static pile method of com- posting will be used. Active composting will occur for 28 days followed by 30 days of curing. During the composting period, biological activity in the compost pile will generate heat which causes pathogens to be killed, volatile solids to be destroyed, and the material to dry. If heat generation is not managed, the compost pile will become so hot that the biological activity will stop. To control pile temperature, which in turn controls the other functions of the composting process, air is blown through the compost pile with a fan. The amount of air blown through the pile is controlled by temperature probes in each pile. This method of compost process control is generally known as the "Rutgers Strategy" and was success- fully demonstrated in the pilot work carried out by the University of Colorado Civil Engineering Department for the City of Longmont. 28 �r0•92A Generally, the operation of this composting facility will be as follows: • a. Sludge cake will be brought to compost facility in dump trucks 5 days per week. b. Dump trucks will empty cake into a sludge transfer enclosure in the mixing building. c. Recycle material either from storage or fully cured material from a curing pile will be brought by bucket loader to the mixing building and placed directly into a mixing unit. d. Sludge will be moved from the transfer enclosure directly to a mixing unit with a large skidsteer loader. e. After mixing sludge cake and recycle together in a mixing unit, the mixture will be discharged into a . small pile next to the mixing unit. f. A bucket loader will move mixed material to the com- posting pile to form the core of new pile. g. A new compost pile will be constructed for each day that sludge cake is brought to the composting facility. h. 24 composting pile spaces will be provided to allow for a gap of a pile spaces between the newly constructed composting pile and the composting pile just becoming 28 days of age. i. Construction of composting piles will progress in a counterclockwise fashion around the composting/curing building. j . Bed and cover material for the new compost pile will be ( moved by bucket loader from the compost pile which has just attained the age of 28 days. k. Material not used for bed or cover of a new compost pile will be moved by bucket loader to a curing pile. 1. Composting will take place for 28 days under aeration and result in material having total solids content of 60 percent and meeting PFRP requirements. m. Each curing pile will hold the material removed from seven compost piles. n. Curing will take place for 30 days under aeration and result in material having a total solids content of 70 percent. o. After curing, material will be moved by bucket loader either to a mixing unit for blending with sludge cake or to the storage pile in the storage building. p. Storage of finish compost and/or amendment will be in extended type piles in a storage building located across from the mixing building. Typical process control measurements and frequency are as follows: Measurement Frequencv Temperature Continuously at 2 locations with r (Each Pile) sensor probes. Twice daily at pile ends with manual thermometers. 29 en,-)6r Weight and Volume Each day that new pile made; • of new pile components for sludge cake and recycle. New Pile Dimensions Each day that new pile made (Overall dimensions & thickness of cover & bedding) Fan run time Daily for each pile Compost Mixture Total Solids Once when pile is constructed, twice during composting, and once when pile is torn down. Free Air Space Once when pile is constructed and once when pile is torn down. Bulk Density Once when pile is constructed and once when pile is torn down. Volatile Solids Of incoming sludge cake and when when pile is torn down. Total Nitrogen Of incoming sludge cake and when pile is torn down. Finish Pile Dimensions Once before pile is torn down. { Contract Hauling of Anaerobzcally Digested Sludge This is the present means of sludge disposal used by the City of Longmont wastewater treatment plant. To preserve flexibility in sludge disposal options, these facilities are being retained at the treatment plant. With this disposal option, sludge is anaerobically digested and then hauled as a liquid, to land dis- posal sites. The hauling and application onto the land is done by companies which contract with the City to perform such services. The details of this disposal unit operation are provided in the existing 0&M documentation for the wastewater treatment plant. B. Maintenance Management System Overall responsibility for proper maintenance of all the was- tewater treatment facilities lies with the Maintenance Supervisor who reports directly to the Treatment Plant Operations Manager. Because the composting facility is remote from the wastewater treatment plant, a mechanic is being assigned to the solids han- dling group. However, each individual associated with the solids handling group plays an important role in keeping the records current and accurate. The appropriate use of field report forms, maintenance management database software, and active dialogue be- tween the operations personnel, clerical personnel , and data l processing personnel will help insure the success of the Solids Handling Maintenance Management Program. 30 01:C, Hello