The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About921099.tiff RESOLUTION RE: APPROVE SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT FOR AN ACCESSORY STRUCTURE LARGER THAN 1500 SQUARE FEET (4608 SQUARE FEET) IN A PLATTED SUBDIVISION IN THE A (AGRICULTURAL) ZONE DISTRICT - JOSEPH A. AND ALLANA M. REIDER WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners held a public hearing on the 18th day of November, 1992, at the hour of 10:00 a.m. in the Chambers of the Board for the purpose of hearing the application of Joseph A. and Allana M. Reider, 3313 Lowell Lane, Erie, Colorado 80516, for a Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit for an accessory structure larger than 1500 square feet (4608 square feet) in a platted subdivision in the A (Agricultural) Zone District on the following described real estate, to-wit: Lot 7, Block 4, Ranch Eggs Subdivision, Weld County, Colorado WHEREAS, Joe Reider, said applicant, was present, and WHEREAS, Section 24.4.2 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance provides standards for review of said Special Review Permit, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners heard all of the testimony and statements of those present, has studied the request of the applicant and the recommendations of the Weld County Planning Commission and all of the exhibits and evidence presented in this matter and, having been fully informed, finds that this request shall be approved for the following reasons: 1. The submitted materials are in compliance with the application requirements of Section 24.7 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 2. It is the opinion of the Board of County Commissioners that the applicant has shown compliance with Section 24.4.2 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: PL0887 921099 SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT - ABIDER PAGE 2 a. This proposal is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan's Urban Growth Boundary Area Goals and Policies. The Urban Growth Boundary Area section provides for the County to encourage land-use development proposals as long as they conform to the desires of affected municipalities. This land use is located within the Urban Growth Boundary Area of four municipalities. All municipalities involved have reviewed this request and expressed no objections. b. This proposal is consistent with the intent of the A (Agricultural) Zone District and is provided for as a Use by Special Review. c. The permitted uses will be compatible with the existing surrounding land-uses which include agricultural production, pasture, rural residences, and egg production facilities. The uses will be compatible with the future development of the surrounding area as permitted by the A (Agricultural) Zone District. d. No overlay districts affect the site. e. The Special Review Permit Development Standards will provide adequate protection of the health, safety, and welfare of the neighborhood and County. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the application for a Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit for an accessory structure larger than 1500 square feet (4608 square feet) in a platted subdivision in the A (Agricultural) Zone District on the hereinabove described parcel of land be, and hereby is, granted subject to the following conditions: 1. The attached Development Standards for the Special Review Permit shall be adopted and placed on the Special Review plat prior to recording the plat. The plat shall be delivered to the Department of Planning Services and be ready for recording in the Weld County Clerk and Recorder's Office within 15 days of approval by the Board of County Commissioners. 2. The Special Review activity shall not occur nor shall any building or electrical permits be issued on the property until the Special Review plat is ready to be recorded in the office of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. 921099 SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT - REIDER PAGE 3 The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 18th day of November, A.D. , 1992. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: � "/jq/{/�� WELD,�COJJNTY, COLORADO DO Weld County Clerk to the Board ( 7�/ .4!C �_.01(� George Keetliedy, Chairman ,Y BY: 71/1„4„51/441?--,_--;,_4/ EXCUSED DATE OF SIGNING (AYE)) eputy Co Eodi'd Constance L. Harbert, Pro-Tem AP S TO FORM: _ ) (/�k + / C. W. Ki /4 ,d.....271.4--1-7--zjesounty Attorneys Gor o L cy W. H. Webster 921099 SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS JOSEPH A. AND ALLANA M. REIDER USR #984 1. The Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit is for a structure larger than 1500 square feet (4608 square feet) in the A (Agricultural) Zone District as submitted in the application materials on file in the Department of Planning Services and subject to the Development Standards stated herein. 2. Approval of this plan may create a vested property right pursuant to Section 90 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 3. Manure from the livestock area shall be removed and handled in a manner that will prevent nuisance conditions. The manure piles shall not be allowed to exist or deteriorate to a condition that facilitates excessive odors, flies, insect pests, or pollutant runoff. The manure storage site shall have a water-tight surface which does not permit seepage or percolation of manure pollutants into the ground. 4. No permanent disposal of wastes shall be permitted at this site. 5. Wood shavings, sawdust, and waste materials shall be handled, stored, and disposed of in a manner that controls fugitive dust, blowing debris, and other potential nuisance conditions. 6. The Special Review Permit area shall be for the private use only of the property owners and shall not be used for any commercial activity. 7. All construction on the property shall be in accordance with the requirements of the Weld County Building Code Ordinance. 8. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Design Standards of Section 24.5 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 9. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Operation Standards of Section 24.6 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 10. Personnel from the Weld County Health Department and Weld County Department of Planning Services shall be granted access onto the property at any reasonable time in order to ensure the activities carried out on the property comply with the Development Standards stated herein and all applicable Weld County Regulations. 921099 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - REIDER PAGE 2 11. The Special Review area shall be limited to the plans shown herein and governed by the foregoing Standards and all applicable Weld County Regulations. Major changes from the plans or Development Standards as shown or stated shall require the approval of an amendment of the Permit by the Weld County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners before such changes from the plans or Development Standards are permitted. Any other changes shall be filed in the office of the Department of Planning Services. 12. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with all of the foregoing Development Standards. Noncompliance with any of the foregoing Development Standards may be reason for revocation of the Permit by the Board of County Commissioners. 921099 HEARING CERTIFICATION DOCKET NO. 92-71 RE: SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT FOR AN ACCESSORY STRUCTURE LARGER THAN 1500 SQUARE FEET (4608 SQUARE FEET) IN A PLATTED SUBDIVISION IN THE A (AGRICULTURAL) ZONE DISTRICT - JOSEPH A. AND ALLANA M. REIDER A public hearing was conducted on November 18, 1992, at 10:00 A.M. , with the following present: Commissioner George Kennedy, Chairman Commissioner Constance L. Harbert, Pro-Tem Commissioner C. W. Kirby Commissioner Gordon E. Lacy Commissioner W. H. Webster Also present: Acting Clerk to the Board, Shelly Miller Assistant County Attorney, Lee Morrison Planning Department representative, Keith Schuett The following business was transacted: I hereby certify that pursuant to a notice dated October 28, 1992, and duly published November 5, 1992, in the Windsor Beacon, a public hearing was conducted to consider the request of Joseph A. and Allana M. Reider for a Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit for an accessory structure larger than 1500 square feet (4608 square feet) in a platted subdivision in the A (Agricultural) Zone District. Lee Morrison, Assistant County Attorney, made this a matter of record. Keith Schuett, Planning Department representative, entered the favorable recommendation of the Planning Commission into the record. Joe Reider, applicant, was present and stated the building is for an indoor riding arena for pleasure, hay storage, and livestock shelter. In response to a question from Commissioner Lacy, Mr. Schuett said the building was started before any permits were issued. Commissioner Lacy questioned whether this building is strictly for personal use. Mr. Reider confirmed it was. At the request of Commissioner Lacy, Mr. Schuett read suggested language for a new Development Standard #6, with the following numbers to follow consecutively, into the record as follows: "The Special Review Permit area shall be for the private use only of the property owners and shall not be used for any commercial activity." Mr. Reider said he is agreeable to the addition. On behalf of Commissioner Kirby, Mr. Morrison confirmed said language. Mr. Schuett confirmed that the State Engineer had no problems with the stormwater plan, and the home is in place and meets all requirements. Commissioner Kirby moved to approve the request of Joseph A. and Allana M. Reider for a Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit for an accessory structure larger than 1500 square feet (4608 square feet) in a platted subdivision in the A (Agricultural) Zone District, based on the recommendations of the Planning staff and the Planning Commission, with the Conditions of Approval and Development Standards as entered into the record. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Webster, and there was no public testimony offered. Commissioner Lacy recommended including the additional Development Standard in the motion. Both Commissioners Kirby and Webster agreed, and the motion carried unanimously. 921099 CC • P L, RE: HEARING CERTIFICATION - REIDER PAGE 2 This Certification was approved on the 23rd day of November, 1992. ✓ WalletBOARDVOD: ATTEST• BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD CO NTY, COLORADO Weld County Clerk to the Board By: 4Aedij G orge Ke nedy, Chairman Deputy Clerk to the Boar EXCUSED DATE OF APPROVAL Constance L. Harbert, Pro-Tem TAPE 1192-38 C. AreAr , W. Kirbcl{e DOCKET #92-71 Gord a PL0887 W. H. Webster 921099 NOT I C E The Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, on November 18, 1992, conditionally approved a Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit for the property and purpose described below. Conditional approval of this plan creates a vested property right pursuant to Article 68 of Title 24, C.R.S. , as amended, for a period of three years. APPLICANT: Joseph A. and Allana M. Reider 3313 Lowell Lane Erie, Colorado 80516 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 7, Block 4, Ranch Eggs Subdivision, Weld County, Colorado TYPE AND INTENSITY OF APPROVED USE: An accessory structure larger than 1500 square feet (4608 square feet) in a platted subdivision in the A (Agricultural) Zone District SIZE OF PARCEL: 5 acres, more or less Failure to abide by the terms and conditions of approval will result in a forfeiture of the vested property right. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO BY: DONALD D. WARDEN CLERK �T�O" THEY BOARD n /� BY: �_�P�—ex,c I�Thc.�Cll@� Deputy ( rk to the Board PUBLISHED: November 25, 1992, in the Windsor Beacon 921099 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF COLORADO ss COUNTY OF WELD fnnee I, KEITH HANSEN, of said County of Weld, being duly The hard a Gusty sworn,say that I am publisher of Convidisterin a WaM .1 Dewey,COINS eb 1902,aanallonsitv aWo"ad• WINDSOR BEACON BIM Satiate DswMPlnent Plan and Special Rwbw Permit for the properly and purpose a weekly newspaper having a general circulation in said described below. Conditional approval of fhb plan amass a County and State, published in the town of WINDSOR, maid ProWty rlgM pursuant to in said County and State; and that the notice, of which Artois 68 el The 24,C.R.S.,as emended,fora pedod of three the annexed is a true copy, has been published in said yam weekly fort_ successive weeks, that the notice APPLICANT:Joseph A. and was published in the regular and entire issue of every Mans M.Raider,3313 Lowell number of the paper during the period and time of Lem,EM,Colorado 89618 publication, and in the newspaper proper and not in a LEGAL DESCRIPTION:VI 7, supplement, and that the first publication of said notice Block 4, Ranch Sa9a Subdivision, Weld Covnp, was in said paper bearing the date of the Colorado � TYPE AND INTENSITY OF "y1/0i'"day of 91.0'Vliva-ri1 , A.D., 199)- and APPROVED USE:An accessory the last publication bearing the date of the structure larger than 1600 square feet(4808 square feel)in a platted subdivision in the A day of , A.D., 19_ and (Agricultural)Zone District that the said WINDSOR BEACON has been published SIZE OF PARCEL: 5 acres, continuously and uninterruptedly for the period of 5 more or less consecutive weeks,in said County and State, prior to the Failure to abide by the terms and date of first publication of said notice, and the same is a Inconditionsaftof approval wit rssuk ted newspaper within the meaning of an Act to regulate a ton o of the vested propedyrigM: printing of legal notices an advertisements, approved BOARD OF COUNTY May 18, 1931, and all prior cts ar as in force. COMMISSIONERS, WELD / COUNTY,COLORADO BY: DONALD D.WARDEN, CLERK TO THE BOARD L P LISHER BY; SHELLY K. MILLER, Deputy Clerk to the Boats Subscrib fl and sw rn to before me this /d _day Published In a. WI of *C.. �,L 191L-:n Beaten on NefeMr ft, Mt _ 74.4..4-1.-e (2r A2-10-441-4 NOTARY PUBLIC p My commission expires 2 , /9 / L`_ 921099 NOT I C E Pursuant to the zoning laws of the State of Colorado and the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, a public hearing will be held in the Chambers of the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, First Floor, Greeley, Colorado, at the time specified. All persons in any manner interested in the Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit are requested to attend and may be heard. Should the applicant or any interested party desire the presence of a court reporter to make a record of the proceedings, in addition to the taped record which will be kept during the hearing, the Clerk to the Board's Office shall be advised in writing of such action at least five days prior to the hearing. The cost of engaging a court reporter shall be borne by the requesting party. BE IT ALSO KNOWN that the text and maps so certified by the Weld County Planning Commission may be examined in the office of the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners, located in the Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Third Floor, Greeley, Colorado. DOCKET NO: 92-71 APPLICANT Joseph A. and Allana M. Reider 3313 Lowell Lane Erie, Colorado 80516 DATE: November 18, 1992 TIME: 10:00 a.m. REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit for an accessory structure larger than 1500 square feet (4608 square feet) in a platted subdivision in the A (Agricultural) Zone District LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 7, Block 4, Ranch Eggs Subdivision, Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Approximately a mile east of Weld County Road 7, north of and adjacent to Lowell Lane (3313 Lowell Lane) BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO BY: DONALD D. WARDEN WELD COUNTY CLERK TO THE BOARD BY: Betty Henson Deputy Clerk to the Board DATED: October 28, 1992 PUBLISHED: November 5, 1992 in the Windsor Beacon 921099 f X4 c1 Pursuant to the zoning Irrs al the State a Colorado ad the Weld Courtly Zoning Ordnance, •public headng will be held in the Chambers of the Board of County Commissioners a Weld AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION county,Colorado,Weld County Centennial Center,016 10th Street,First Floor,Greeley, STATE OF COLORADO Colorado,at the time specified. All persons In any manner SS Interested in the Site Specific COUNTY OF WELD Development Plan and Special Review Permit are requested to attend and may be heard. I, KEITH HANSEN, of said County of Weld,being duly Should the applicant or any sworn,say that I am publisher of Interested party desire the pmeenoe of r court reporter to ma ke • arecord p1t the WINDSOR BEACON proeadings,in addition to the I taped gin `the hearing.d atate ale l kept a weekly newspaper a general circulation in said udgtitrtit Clerk tohaving County and State, published in the town of WINDSOR, the Board's Office shall be advised in wilting of such melonin said County and State; and that the notice, of which at!east five days prior to the the annexed is a true copy, has been published in said hearing.The cost of engaging a weekly for _successive weeks, that the notice court reporter shall be bane by _ the requesting party. was published in the regular and entire issue of every BE IT ALSO KNOWN that the number of the paper during the period and time of Ntandmyweq certified tythe publication, and in the newspaper proper and not in a Weld County Planning supplement, and that the first publication of said notice Commission may be examined tithe Mks of the Clerk lorry was in said paper bearing the date of the Board Mks Board of County zy Commissioners, eCounty Centennial Center, 5 Gf day of (1 d31/1.--nt.bifi✓ , A.D., 19 q2—and 016 10th Street,Third Floor, the last publication bearing the date of the GraNy,Col rado. DoCKETNO: 0271 day of , A.D., 19_ and APPLICANT:Joseph A.and that the said 'WINDSOR BEACON has been published Agana M.Raider,3313 Lowell continuously and uninterruptedly for the period of 5 Lane,Eris,Colorado 110616 consecutive weeks,in said County and State, prior to the DATE: November 10,100¢ date of first publication of said notice, and the same is a TIME:10:00 a.m. newspaper within'the meaning of an Act to regulate printing of legal notices an advertisements, approved REQUEST:vep Plan and Special A Site SpecificMay 18, 1931, and all prior cts r as in force. Review Permit for an accessory structure larger than 1600 square feet(4608 square feet) in•platted subdivision In the A (Agricultural)Zone District - P LISHER LEGAL DESCRIPTION:Let 7, Block 4, Ranch Eggs Subscri d and sworn to before me this 11J day Subdivision, Weld County, Colorado of �qrA./.64-k Jzer" 19 q, LOCATION: County 1/4 ,M^ O ; 9 / ry e mile east of Weld County Road by ALL yL(lJ lt/1N.A 7, north of and adjacent to NOTARY PUBLIC Lowell Lane(3313 Lowell Lane) BOARD OF , WELD My commission expires 442- _. COMMISSIONERS,COLORADO WELD COUNTY, DONALD D.WARDEN,WELD COUNTY CLERK TO THE BOARD BY: Betty Hanson, Deputy Clerk to the Board • Published In the Windage Sesser an Naempn Lien. 921099 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Notice of Hearing, Docket No. 92-71, was placed in the Unted States mail, postage prepaid, addressed to the following property owners. DATED this 30th day of October, 1992. k-eiv4(i.c+y-✓ Deputy Clerk the Board Richard Cosslen 9, Longmont National Bank Fifth and Coffman Longmont, Colorado 80501 John R. and Rosemary P. Murphy 3363 Lowell Lane Erie, Colorado 80516 Wendell D. and Arlene A. Stahl 3410 Johnson Lane Erie, Colorado 80516 Clayton C. and Sherri Struble 3310 Johnson Lane Erie, Colorado 80516 Daryl L. and Linda M. Phipps P. O.Box 524 Erie, Colorado 80516-0524 William C. and Kathleen A. Hoffman 3210 Johnson Lane Erie, Colorado 80516 Estol Rockwell 3213 Lowell Lane Erie, Colorado 80516 Robert J. and Ardith L. Mady 3263 Lowell Lane Erie, Colorado 80516 Joseph A. and Allana M. Reider 3313 Lowell Lane Erie, Colorado 80516 pr�� 92�099 3310 Johnson Lane Erie, CO 80516 October 30, 1992 Weld County Commissioners 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 RE: Case USR 984, Lot 7, Block 4, Ranch Eggs Subdivision, Weld County, Colorado Dear Sirs; Joseph A. and Allana M. Reider have requested a special permit to build a structure larger than 1500 square feet in a platted subdivision in the A(Agricultural) zone district. More specifically, the structure is 4588.8 square feet. This is a follow up to the 10/27/92 telephone conversation between Mr. George Kennedy, Weld County Commissioner, and me. I understand that construction of the building in question was initiated and continued without permit until challenged by Weld County officials, who happened to be inspecting another building in the area. Only then was a building permit application even submitted. Construction continues on the building, even though the County Commissioners have not ruled on this special permit. To me, this indicates a complete disregard for the County Commissioners' authority. As I told Mr. Reider, I am not adamantly opposed to the building in question. Upon reflection, however, I feel compelled to state that I am opposed to the total disregard for county rules that construction of the building seems to indicate. Mr. Reider built his own home on the property, and I understand that he is a contractor by trade. In light of this, I feel certain that Mr. Reider was aware of building code restrictions, regardless of any allegations to the contrary. In my opinion, the Planning Commission members failed to meet their obligation in dealing with this issue. Why it is up to the public (in this case, me) to defend laws that are already on the books? Neighbors are now in the position of defending legal requirements that should be enforced by the legal system. Of what purpose are the restrictions if there is no enforcement? 921099 Ey,14it' IT L. cc. /°I. My concern is that the Planning Commission is allowing a precedent to be set in allowing this structure to remain. Such a precedent could nullify the building code restrictions. Mr. Reider's statement to me that he will be doing additional construction within this subdivision adds to that concern. I'm looking to you to insure that the zoning restrictions governing Ranch Eggs Subdivision are upheld. Please respond to the issues raised in this letter and provide information regarding the outcome of this case. Good luck in your bid for reelection. Sincerely, C AYTON C. STRUBLE onstituent Copy to: Dorthy Shamy, Ranch Egg Estates Association President SUMMARY OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING October 20, 1992 Page 2 L , ;. Bud Clemons wanted to now if this property had at one time been ann ed Yrito-the City of Greeley. Keith explained it had been annexed and then annexed. Bud Clemons asked why the western portion of the property was beinge rezoned since it was in the City of Greeley:\ Keith Schuett explained that is 4¢'plication affected only unincorporated areas o£ Weld County. Jean Hoffman 4ked why the Utility Coordinating Advisory Committee had heard this applidation. Keith Schuett / explained this is a step in the P.U.D. process. // Don Feldhaus asked about the time `laspe since the/original request and the final plan. Keith Schuett explained a change in management had occurred at the airport and the information necessary for the final/.U.D. The Chairperson asked if there was anyone/in the audience who wished to speak for or against this application. Jack Allmer, surrounding property Dither, asked how this application would affect his property and other surrounding property. It was determined that he would meet with Kevin Bunnell and diruss future plans. The Chairperson asked the/applicant if they had seen the Planning staff' s recommendation and were iptagreement. Kevin Bunnell said they were in agreement. Jean Hoffman moved C,Se Number S-327, Greeley-Weld County Airport Authority, be forwarded to the BSrard of County Commissioners with the Planning Commissions' recommendation fof approval. Don Feldhaus seconded the motion. /r The Chairperson asked the secretary to poll the membets of the Planning Commission or their decision. Richard Kimmel - yes; Jean Roffman - yes; Bill O'Hare - es; Judy Yamaguchi - yes; Juliette Kroekel - yes; Do Feldhaus - yes; Bud Cle ons - yes. Motion carried unanimously. Bud lemons wanted to encourage the County Commissioners to work with the City o Greeley and get this double ownership/funding problem solved once and for all. CASE NUMBER: USR-984 NAME: Joseph A. and Allana M. Reider ADDRESS: 3313 Lowell Lane, Erie, CO 80516 REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for an accessory structure larger than 1500 square feet (4608 square feet) in a platted subdivision in the A (Agricultural) zone district. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 7, Block 4, Ranch Eggs Subdivision, Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: Approximately 1/4 mile east of Weld County Road 7, north of and adjacent to Lowell Lane (3313 Lowell Lane) . g )et-/ 1124-7- 6. 921099 SUMMARY OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING October 20, 1992 Page 3 Joe Reider, applicant, explained the request for the size of building is to accommodate an indoor riding arena, hay storage, and two box stalls. Bill O'Hare asked if the applicant agreed with the Planning staff' s recommendation. Joe Reider said yes, they were in agreement. Judy Yamaguchi asked if this facility would be for the property owners personal use. Joe Reider said yes. The Chairperson asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak for or against this application. No one wished to speak. Richard Kimmel moved Case Number USR-984, Joseph A. and Allana -M. Raider, with the Conditions of Approval and Development Standards , be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with the Planning Commissioners recommendation for approval. Bud Clemons seconded the motion. The Chairperson asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Richard Kimmel - yes; Jean Hoffman - yes; Bill O'Hare - yes; Judy Yamaguchi - yes; Juliette Kroekel - yes; Don Feldhaus - yes; Bud Clemons - yes. Motion carried unanimously. CASE NUMBE • USR-987 NAME: Snyde Oil Company ADDRESS : 10 5 Broadway, Suite 2200, Denver, CO , REQUEST: A Si Specific Development Plan and a pecial Review permit for an Oil a Gas Support and Service Fa lity (natural gas compressor station) in the A (Agricultural) ne district. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the SW4 SW4/pf Section 30, T3N, R63W of the 6th P.M. , Weld Countyy/Colorado. LOCATION: Approximatel 6 miles north/eAst of Keenesburg. Bill DeLap, representative, nyder it Company, gave a brief overview of this request, and asked if the Pla inj Commission members had any questions. Don Feldhaus asked how many personne would work at this facility and who would serve as the emergency response pers7nne . Bill DeLap said one to two employees would man the facility and Southeayt Weld ire Protection District would serve as the emergency response organiz " ion. The hairperson asked if the applicant was in agreement with the Plann' g staff' s re mmendation. Bill DeLap said yes. The Chairperson aske if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak for or against this ap ication. No one wished speak. 921099 BEFORE THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, PLANNING COMMISSION - - RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMI!S$IQNERS'° !!: N:{ Moved by Richard Kimmel that the following resolution be introduced0fGJ:passage by the Weld County Planning Commission. Be it resolved by t-hg--Wel4nCounty Planning Commission that the application for: CASE NUMBER: USR-984 NAME: Joseph A. and Allana M. Reider ADDRESS: 3313 Lowell Lane, Erie, CO 80516 REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for an accessory structure larger than 1500 square feet (4608 square feet) in a platted subdivision in the A (Agricultural) zone district. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 7, Block 4, Ranch Eggs Subdivision, Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: Approximately 1/4 mile east of Weld County Road 7, north of and adjacent to Lowell Lane (3313 Lowell Lane) . be recommended favorably to the Board of County Commissioners for the following reasons: 1. The submitted materials are in compliance with the application requirements of Section 24.7 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 2. It is the opinion of the Department of Planning Services' staff that the applicant has shown compliance with Section 24.3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: This proposal is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan's Urban Growth Boundary area goals and policies. The Urban Growth Boundary area section provides for the County to encourage land-use development proposals as long as they conform to the desires of affected municipalities. This land use is located within the Urban Growth Boundary Area of four municipalities. All municipalities involved have reviewed this request and expressed no objections. This proposal is consistent with the intent of the A (Agricultural) zone district and is provided for as a Use by Special Review. The permitted uses will be compatible with the existing surrounding land-uses which include agricultural production, pasture, rural residences, and egg production facilities. The uses will be compatible with the future development of the surrounding area as permitted by the A (Agricultural) zone district. 921099 )0-F/ J r 7 !-�� RESOLUTION, USR-984 Joseph A. and Allana M. Reider Page 2 No overlay districts affect the site. The Special Review Permit Development Standards will provide adequate protection of the health, safety, and welfare of the neighborhood and County. This recommendation is based, in part, upon a review of the application materials submitted by the applicant, other relevant information regarding the request, and responses from referral entities. The Planning Commission's recommendation for approval is conditional upon the following: 1. The attached Development Standards for the Special Review permit shall be adopted and placed on the Special Review plat prior to recording the plat. The plat shall be delivered to the Department of Planning Services and be ready for recording in the Weld County Clerk and Recorder's office within 15 days of approval by the Board of County Commissioners. 2. The Special Review activity shall not occur nor shall any building or electrical permits be issued on the property until the Special Review plat is ready to be recorded in the office of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. Motion seconded by Bud Clemons. VOTE: For Passage Against Passage Richard Kimmel Jean Hoffman Bill O'Hare Judy Yamaguchi Juliette Kroekel Don Feldhaus Bud Clemons The Chairperson declared the resolution passed and ordered that a certified copy be forwarded with the file of this case to the Board of County Commissioners for further proceedings. CERTIFICATION OF COPY I, Sharyn Ruff, Recording Secretary for the Weld County Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing resolution, is a true copy of the resolution of the Planning Commission of Weld County, Colorado, adopted on October 20, 1992. � - ed the 2 h''��ob-r, 1992 9r�.� 099 Sharyn F. Ruff tii Secretary SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Joseph A. and Allana M. Reider USR-984 1. The Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review permit is for a structure larger than 1500 square feet (4608 square feet) in the A (Agricultural) zone district as submitted in the application materials on file in the Department of Planning Services and subject to the Development Standards stated hereon. 2. Approval of this plan may create a vested property right pursuant to Section 90 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 3. Manure from the livestock area shall be removed and handled in a manner that will prevent nuisance conditions. The manure piles shall not be allowed to exist or deteriorate to a condition that facilitates excessive odors, flies, insect pests, or pollutant runoff. The manure storage site shall have a water-tight surface which does not permit seepage or percolation of manure pollutants into the ground. 4. No permanent disposal of wastes shall be permitted at this site. 5. Wood shavings, sawdust, and waste materials shall be handled, stored, and disposed of in a manner that controls fugitive dust, blowing debris, and other potential nuisance conditions. 6. All construction on the property shall be in accordance with the requirements of the Weld County Building Code Ordinance. 7. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Design Standards of Section 24.5 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 8. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Operation Standards of Section 24.6 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 9. Personnel from the Weld County Health Department and Weld County Department of Planning Services shall be granted access onto the property at any reasonable time in order to ensure the activities carried out on the property comply with the Development Standards stated hereon and all applicable Weld County Regulations. 921099 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, USR-984 Joseph A. and Allana M. Reider Page 2 10. The Special Review area shall be limited to the plans shown hereon and governed by the foregoing Standards and all applicable Weld County Regulations. Major changes from the plans or Development Standards as shown or stated shall require the approval of an amendment of the Permit by the Weld County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners before such changes from the plans or Development Standards are permitted. Any other changes shall be filed in the office of the Department of Planning Services. 11. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with all of the foregoing Development Standards. Noncompliance with any of the foregoing Development Standards may be reason for revocation of the Permit by the Board of County Commissioners. 921099 INVENT,..1 OF ITEMS SUBMITTED FOR CONSID. .TION Applicant: Joesph A. and Allana M. Reider Case Number: USR-984 Submitted or Prepared Prior to Hearing At Hearing 1. Application 18 pages X 2. 1 Application plat 1 page X 3. DPS Referral Summary Sheet X 4. DPS Recommendation X 5. DPS Surrounding Property Owner's Mailing List X 6. DPS Mineral Owner's Mailing List X 7. 3 DPS Maps Prepared by Planning Technician X 8. DPS Notice of Hearing X 9. DPS Case File Summary Sheet X 10. DPS Field Check X 11. Memo dated August 31, 1992, from Mr. John X Pickle, Environmental Protection Services 12. Referral response dated September 3, 1992, from X Don Carroll, Weld County Engineering 13. Referral response dated September 1, 1992, from X Cathy Miller, Boulder Valley Soil Conservation District 14. Referral response dated August 28, 1992, from X Mark Lawley, Mountain View Fire Protection District 15. Referral response dated September 1, 1992, from X Gene Inloes, Weld County Extension Service 16. Referral response dated August 27, 1992 from Ed X Herring, Weld County Office of Emergency Management 17. Referral response dated August 31, 1992, from Mr. X Carlson, City of Broomfield 18. Referral response dated September 1, 1992, from X Ronald Hougland, City of Thornton, Community Development Department 19. Referral response dated September 2, 1992, from X Adams County Planning 20. Letter dated September 17, 1992, from Scott Hahn, X Town of Erie 21. Inspection report dated August 30, 1992, from X gShirley Camenisch 921099 g",140(.1,11- 119 INVENTORY ITEMS Joesph A. and Allana M. Reider USR-984 Submitted or Prepared Prior to Hearing At Hearing 22. Referral response dated October 9, 1992, from the City of Northglenn X I hereby certify that the 21 items identified herein were submitted to the Department of Planning Services at or prior to the scheduled Planning Commission hearing. I further certify that these items were forwarded to the Clerk to the Board's office on October 23, 1992. ent anner STATE OF COLORADO ) COUNTY OF WELD ) su4s A ttp,AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS42? day of 19 Ay 0-fi , t of =^��'•. NOTARY UB C !%9') a'mm srs en Expires MyCommiSSiOilapimstspvai 21 )gc5 921099 5XHIBIT INVENTORY CONTROL SHEET Case LAS - �� Ut Exhibit Submitted By Exhibit Description pp p (� r r ce. iDiz8l5D. t o "AKk �LJatnk 11/3/5-;:i E. l �m 0✓ 10Men_ F. 1 O G. H. I. J. K. L. M. N. 0. P. Q. R. S. T. U. V. W. X. Y. Z. 921099 THE SIGN SHALL BE POSTED ADJACENT TO AND VISIBLE FROM A PUBLICLY MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF- WAY. IN THE EVENT THE PROPERTY UNDER CONSIDERATION IS NOT ADJACENT TO A PUBLICLY MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, THE APPLICANT SHALL POST ONE SIGN IN THE MOST PROMINENT PLACE ON THE PROPERTY AND POST A SECOND SIGN AT THE POINT AT WHICH THE DRIVEWAY (ACCESS • DRIVE) INTERSECTS A PUBLICLY MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY. • BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SIGN POSTING CERTIFICATE 9 I HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER THE PENALTIES OF PERJURY THAT THE SIGN PROVIDED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES WAS POSTED ON THE PROPERTY AT LEAST 10 DAYS BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS HEARING FOR CASE # 145/421r,/ in THE SIGN WASJ POSTED BY: c ; • ( LJ L , _AC _ NAME OF P SON POSTING SIGN 7 d SYGNA E OF APPLICANT STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. COUNTY OF WELD ) • `` SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO ME THIS / 7_DAY OF /� , 19 9 _ SEAL 1� NOTARY PUBLIC • MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 8 -d -9�AOZ qLAST DAY TO POST SIGN IS: , 19 ‘17 . PLEASE RETURN THIS FORM TO THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES' OFFICE ON OR BEFORE THE DATE OF THE HEARING. • 921099 Date: October 20, 1992 CASE NUMBER: USR-984 NAME: Joseph A. and Allana M. Reider ADDRESS: 3313 Lowell Lane, Erie, CO 80516 REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for an accessory structure larger than 1500 square feet (4608 square feet) in a platted subdivision in the A (Agricultural) zone district. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 7, Block 4, Ranch Eggs Subdivision, Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: Approximately 1/4 mile east of Weld County Road 7, north of and adjacent to Lowell Lane (3313 Lowell Lane) . THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES' STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THIS REQUEST BE APPROVED FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: 1. The submitted materials are in compliance with the application requirements of Section 24.7 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 2. It is the opinion of the Department of Planning Services' staff that the applicant has shown compliance with Section 24.3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: This proposal is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan' s Urban Growth Boundary area goals and policies. The Urban Growth Boundary area section provides for the County to encourage land-use development proposals as long as they conform to the desires of affected municipalities. This land use is located within the Urban Growth Boundary Area of four municipalities. All municipalities involved have reviewed this request and expressed no objections. This proposal is consistent with the intent of the A (Agricultural) zone district and is provided for as a Use by Special Review. The permitted uses will be compatible with the existing surrounding land-uses which include agricultural production, pasture, rural residences, and egg production facilities. The uses will be compatible with the future development of the surrounding area as permitted by the A (Agricultural) zone district. No overlay districts affect the site. The Special Review Permit Development Standards will provide adequate protection of the health, safety, and welfare of the neighborhood and County. 921099 RECOMMENDATION, USR-984 Joseph A. and Allana M. Reider Page 2 This recommendation is based, in part, upon a review of the application materials submitted by the applicant, other relevant information regarding the request, and responses from referral entities. The Department of Planning Services' staff recommendation for approval is conditional upon the following: 1. The attached Development Standards for the Special Review permit shall be adopted and placed on the Special Review plat prior to recording the plat. The plat shall be delivered to the Department of Planning Services and be ready for recording in the Weld County Clerk and Recorder' s office within 15 days of approval by the Board of County Commissioners. 2. The Special Review activity shall not occur nor shall any building or electrical permits be issued on the property until the Special Review plat is ready to be recorded in the office of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. 921099 SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Joseph A. and Allana M. Reider USR-984 1. The Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review permit is for a structure larger than 1500 square feet (4608 square feet) in the A (Agricultural) zone district as submitted in the application materials on file in the Department of Planning Services and subject to the Development Standards stated hereon. 2. Approval of this plan may create a vested property right pursuant to Section 90 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 3. Manure from the livestock area shall be removed and handled in a manner that will prevent nuisance conditions. The manure piles shall not be allowed to exist or deteriorate to a condition that facilitates excessive odors, flies, insect pests, or pollutant runoff. The manure storage site shall have a water-tight surface which does not permit seepage or percolation of manure pollutants into the ground. 4. No permanent disposal of wastes shall be permitted at this site. 5. Wood shavings, sawdust, and waste materials shall be handled, stored, and disposed of in a manner that controls fugitive dust, blowing debris, and other potential nuisance conditions. 6. All construction on the property shall be in accordance with the requirements of the Weld County Building Code Ordinance. 7. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Design Standards of Section 24.5 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 8. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Operation Standards of Section 24.6 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 9. Personnel from the Weld County Health Department and Weld County Department of Planning Services shall be granted access onto the property at any reasonable time in order to ensure the activities carried out on the property comply with the Development Standards stated hereon and all applicable Weld County Regulations. 921099 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, USR-984 Joseph A. and Allana M. Reider Page 2 10. The Special Review area shall be limited to the plans shown hereon and governed by the foregoing Standards and all applicable Weld County Regulations. Major changes from the plans or Development Standards as shown or stated shall require the approval of an amendment of the Permit by the Weld County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners before such changes from the plans or Development Standards are permitted. Any other changes shall be filed in the office of the Department of Planning Services. 11. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with all of the foregoing Development Standards. Noncompliance with any of the foregoing Development Standards may be reason for revocation of the Permit by the Board of County Commissioners. 921099 LAND-USE APPLICATION SUMMARY SHEET Date: October 13, 1992 CASE NUMBER: USR-984 NAME: Joseph A. and Allana M. Reider ADDRESS: 3313 Lowell Lane Erie, CO 80516 REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a structure larger than 1500 square feet (4608 square feet) in a platted subdivision in the A (Agricultural) zone district. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 7, Block 4, Ranch Eggs Subdivision, Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: Approximately 1/4 mile east of Weld County Road 7, north of and adjacent to Lowell Lane (3313 Lowell Lane) . SIZE OF PARCEL: 5 acres, more or less. POSSIBLE ISSUES SUMMARIZED FROM APPLICATION MATERIALS: The criteria for review of this Special Review permit is listed in Section 24.3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. The Department of Planning Services staff has received responses from the following agencies: 1. Weld County Environmental Protection Services. 2. Weld County Engineering Department. 3. Boulder Valley Soil Conservation District. 4. Mountain View Fire Protection District. 5. Weld County Extension Service. 6. Weld County Office of Emergency Management. 7. The City of Broomfield. 8. The City of Thornton, Community Development Department. 9. Adams County Planning Department. 10. The Town of Erie. 11. The City of Northglenn No objections have been received by Department of Planning Services' staff from surrounding property owners. Several phone inquires have been received by staff from surrounding property owners. 921099 `--F F mil.-✓�-. 7 . y--, } i. li ] C•• xz u...ro 1 . _ ? ( .I w r ® 1 ze . • •• •,4 . °p�t°V <• =p•• e> ,yam 1 zx :�� x I I �' C4 ] cLCR ! . ! fire, '7 'a ., • ,5 • II5I•5'I _Ani.2 I • ea • I iffir 35 gip 5?_.7:,...I: to :__ ;._ � '\ r• T{//•/ 'M v`e• '•. s a :-1:-ear 11 I cyst. (EEN<as •.-M... es ,. . mi. I ni ; ."7:Aa- ;*•ii(1 _1,. s• :J.%._...__._....._.___IIIR: lc. ar lik• •- ^ i:i 'p _ 1 1(j/ . ]z �• , ze , ki z•. `I . . .. .r..s .... - s n. ..e G - •az :\ Rf .d. I. az : . mil•lit:}J 4 — - RR .D .LA: . /� • TO ' I .R. T -_ --- . - .I -�FDSt<r h�y • r z. : SLn'a,yrnn�� <sO x 1 r I zs •"°'e� zN .� 21- ] 1 •\o I 1 >• I x ]z N.—7(, ,„...,„0„,,nx /Y or1ARB55 OURo •ONOSi 4�i• • 't •bra n .I31 • ^ 1 ° e. I. �� `� \ 1, _'._. 6. STAPE REC 1 • -''—KW--_iS ,57- • - ,.....11.E. _. r- � �c :a. id L. .r .ir�J -,4_-_,T. 1 w' / • c �,,/1 ' x • �• . -� . �'°, �� ' I 7 , m ' l z: I• cxcxAxre' tit 1 @IC ' :% - i� ! d °p' CAEA IIR ---_. _. ' .q.'• Ti aI. S...o :.� . x> 1 ---- - -- :1 ,•• 0e' se°°° •�;C•z'. •iti I• tz .0°.L rev . I` .� \ 7: - °r. ` °i l^fit .-'.te� 1 '¢ --'Or. pm• • .. °JrP. �..,? Ir i• l�, ._®�. . c, ; Vie eittr rte ?: „•J v9 '.. rte. 3x •'l 1E. S 1\•• :• Dor Je p • ART LUPTON pq. /ci• s • ' Ill Rj i� P.,.B� Cs.3� , **GG r i� _ . II1UIEUiiF2I 0. .. J- ±i! I i • ' � � ,I�i y'/ � IPUL .01 `II •��:- •;.- - . I C CS CG /1 111 • .��N jf . I / 1 iL1„/ •:. -•°° °: z o,11 MM J • . eec® • ] ,r 2 •• I 0 r/CH".4:4;e;';C: /Ha 27 riT. P°il _-- a""-ten,• /, 1 _ . 1• • OM,ii i , s� 1, 1I , I v 1s. • ! .6ASE ' II ) . I I•' i •A C' I x11 `-\ 1•1]I I• [ 39 / / �%' ' 11 ` . 1 6 v --'( / .:r -i " n R.66�lJ i R W I �. R.66 W. \-4:;_1 (P4-•-t2'...',, :c y� 1 ' Y��h a �f4 :',/„.c‘'''';`-: ,;* , y.. ..i.;d,i `� . X . , ,,<„,.. ✓Rq . tr h, II'444 Y �f! P I / 1�. J �P/i t M 4'i i fY 5. +'at- fit th . �� C/� 7• /G�' y / I s '•- 'll 509 o ' / 7 � !i ri I \\\ 0 \ \ �r ': �1 ,—�A A i C It, // 2� it :r7t/c< I — � ��/ 5150 �� Jil MMbNI7Y.=�� z —_. � �, ash ington Mme _'N \'\ --- r Q;• -..' Ii .; I'•",. View hool'� /_• •'• H t3 1 y. 5 Lt-,/-A--n--� C -- --;-;-- ,,-'1 1/ • %c.a.� __ '.• - . 515 r /_ _ 9/li-G� � , hl i e.34 ( 1 �Y �c' r ��\V �\ �� \ A �f ` 166 5I so\ • /'------ r14' V 1 11 r ee (� w . r \ ... \Y 22i/-\�� j�- " \v O. .1 " M 2 , O.W LD r0 s �1 :I ' I• '. '.. '.E"'o"be ',.`.,, .E. 1.a.o, . —,.,: . ,AD'AM C -f . 2 FEE I E yy� y d... 100000m G If nR.'*1' �ncravca.luJTCR.ST4TF JOi l5 MI.I : . ' BRIGHTON 85 Ml p:};R „ .". y,,, �• " � Hr ,. ts_ { , .,d t yitb •:4!v ar J4 e....1d1 • • • • YA _t • s.4•• ` .4 . • r • . . _. . . . , •., • ,.... • . • , .. . •R2R. j. . .• . , . .. . .• . . •.. . , ..,.. .„, „, ... O„.., . . . ... , . ..•I . .. .. •. . .. .. ` a • • .. `iP # Y. •_ _ • • .. . . • . .... . . . .. . .., .. +Y .. F •• • • ig , ''r . } , ., :View • Vi • • t' • � •} l 5• t • • ,..► . , a ;_ P .. ` } 99 • r O..' ' ''' '' IVE•". ',,., ' • ..1111,L0 , , . ....., __ _.• .. . . . . .. .. . , ~ . . . t ... . 921093 Wit .; R..- FIELD CHECK FILING NUMBER: USR-984 DATE OF INSPECTION: (lap . ) C) q 2 - C APPLICANT'S NAME: Joseph A. and Allana M. Reider CURRENT PLANNER: Keith A. Schuett REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a structure larger than 1500 square feet (4588.8 square foot structure) in a platted subdivision in the A (Agricultural) zone district. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 7, Block 4, Ranch Eggs Subdivision, Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: Approximately 1/4 mile east of Weld County Road 7; north of and adjacent to Lowell Lane (3313 Lowell Lane) . 2 LAND USE: N �� /j�� r r E v. nnUAO 1V".`/'V 1rL J ! -1�QJ-t_� L fX S 2CX U U R ° 1W MfJ P il� L� LL DgAA-t � C( UJ �YV� rcJ ZONING: N A (Agricultural) E A (Agricultural) S A (Agricultural) W A (Agricultural) COMMENT SIS-0.42 (Add 006- (A-e- , °2/ )59A-C_ ' Jaiecyc s S. 921099 FIELD CHECK FILING NUMBER: USR-984 DATE OF INSPECTION: October 7, 1992 NAME: Joseph A. and Allana M. Reider REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special review permit for an Accessory structure larger than 1500 square feet (4608 square feet) in a platted subdivision, in the A (Agricultural) zone district. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 7, Block 4, Ranch Eggs Subdivision, Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: Approximately 1/4 mile east of Weld County Road 7, north of and adjacent to Lowell Lane (3313 Lowell Lane) . LAND USE: N Rural residences, egg production facilities. E Rural residence, farm production. S Lowell Lane, Agricultural production. W Rural residence, egg production facilities. ZONING: N A (Agricultural) E A (Agricultural) S A (Agricultural) W A (Agricultural) COMMENTS: The property is as shown on the plat. A portion of the structure is built. Access is off Lowell Lane a gravel County road. The property slopes from the northeast down to the south west. • A. Schuett Current Planner 921099 REFERRAL LIST NAME: Joseph A. and Allana M. Reider CASE NUMBER: USR-984 REFERRALS SENT: August 26, 1992 REFERRALS TO BE RECEIVED BY: September 9, 1992 COUNTY TOWNS and CITIES _Attorney —Ault X Health Department Brighton X Extension Service —' X Broomfield X Emergency Management Office —Dacono Sheriff' s Office Eaton X- Engineering " X Erie _Housing Authority —Evans Airport Authority —Firestone —R--Building Inspection —Fort Lupton ____Frederick STATE _Garden City Division of Water Resources Gilcrest _ _Geological Survey Greeley — Department of Health Grover _ Highway Department Hudson _Historical Society —Johnstown Water Conservation Board Keenesburg Oil and Gas Conservation Commission _Kersey La Salle FIRE DISTRICTS _Lochbuie Ault F-1 Longmont _ _Berthoud F-2 _Mead Briggsdale F-24 Milliken _Brighton F-3 New Raymer Eaton F-4 vbrA X Northglenn _Fort Lupton F-5 —Nunn Galeton F-6 _Platteville _Hudson F-7 Severance Johnstown F-8 --, X Thornton La Salle F-9 —Windsor X Mountain View F-10 _Milliken F-11 COUNTIES Nunn F-12 X Adams _ _Pawnee F-22 —Boulder Platteville F-13 Larimer _ Platte Valley F-14 _ Poudre Valley F-15 FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES Raymer F-2 US Army Corps of Engineers Southeast Weld F-16 _USDA-APHIS Veterinary Service Windsor/Severance F-17 Federal Aviation Administration Wiggins F-18 Federal Communication Commission _ Western Hills F-20 SOIL CONSERVATION DISTRICTS OTHER —Brighton Central Colo. Water Conservancy Dist. _Fort Collins _ Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. Greeley Tri-Area Planning Commission X Longmont West Adams COMMISSION/BOARD MEMBER X Shirley Camenisch 921O99 MEMORAnDU WIlD o Keith A. Schuett To Weld County Planning Date August 31, 1992 COLORADO From John S. Pickle, M.S.E.H. , Director, Environmental Het f' Subject: Case Number: USR-984 Name: Reider, Joseph and'Allana Environmental Protection Services has reviewed this proposal; the following conditions are recommended to be part of any approval: 1. The applicant shall remove, handle, and stockpile manure from the livestock area in a manner that will prevent nuisance conditions. The manure piles shall not be allowed to exist or deteriorate to a condition that facilitates excessive odors, flies, insect pests, or pollutant runoff. The manure storage site shall have a water-tight surface which does not permit seepage or percolation of manure pollutants into the ground. 2. No permanent disposal of wastes shall be permitted at this site. 3. Wood shavings, saw dust, and waste materials shall be handled, stored, and disposed in a manner that controls fugitive dust, blowing debris, and other potential nuisance conditions. JSP/lam-1798 SEP 0 1992 Wok!County Planning 921099 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES ‘ts., RECEJI/ ^ 1 PHONE(303)3586000,EXT.4400 ED AUG 1 915 10th STREET GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 COLORADO August 25, 1992 CASE NUMBER: USR-984 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from Joseph A. and Allana M. Reider for a Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a structure larger than 1500 square feet (4588.8 square foot structure) in a platted subdivision in the A (Agricultural) zone district. The parcel of land is described as Lot 7, Block 4, Ranch Eggs Subdivision, Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is approximately 1/4 mile east of Weld County Road 7; north of and adjacent to Lowell Lane (3313 Lowell Lane) . This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by September 9, 1992, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Keith A. Schuett, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. _ 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: 3.` We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests . trort1H W4-11M- TLuns{' - Ott 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Please /refer to the enclosed letter. /e Signed: JO7n GF0__SOIta ea Agency: vi?d ns-, n Date: y+.. 1.— 9 a 921099 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE(303)35&4000,EXT.4400 915 10th STREET U GREELEY,COLOLORADO80531 C� SEP 0 2 bl2 COLORADO L3 Weld County Planning August 26, 1992 CASE NUMBER: USR-984 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from Joseph A. and Allana M. Reider for a Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a structure larger than 1500 square feet (4588.8 square foot structure) in a platted subdivision in the A (Agricultural) zone district. The parcel of land is described as Lot 7, Block 4, Ranch Eggs Subdivision, Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is approximately 1/4 mile east of Weld County Road 7; north of and adjacent to Lowell Lane (3313 Lowell Lane) . This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by September 9, 1992, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Keith A. Schuett, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request _ (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: 3. X We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests . 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Signed: [ ,222LLfP i_ Agency: Boulder Valley Soil Conservation District Date: Septe er 1, 19q°l" 921099 • ll DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE(303)3513-40O0,EXT.4400 915 10th STREET GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 C. COLORADO August 26, 1992 CASE NUMBER: USA-984 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from Joseph A. and Allana M. Reider for a Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a structure larger than 1500 square feet (4588.8 square foot structure) in a platted subdivision in the A (Agricultural) zone district. The parcel of land is described as Lot 7, Block 4, Ranch Eggs Subdivision, Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is approximately 1/4 mile east of Weld County Road 7; north of and adjacent to Lowell Lane (3313 Lowell Lane) . This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by September 9 , 1992, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Keith A. Schuett, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: 3. � We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests . 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. `Please refe to t enclosed letter. Signed: /�•C,C j, !� Agency: Date: _ 2,0 !— a__ Wild County Plink* 921cr-s KM(1%irs DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE(3031358-4000,EXT.4400 91510th STREET GREELEY,COLORADO 80831 C. COLORADO August 26, 1992 CASE NUMBER: USR-984 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from Joseph A. and Allana M. Reider for a Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a structure larger than 1500 square feet (4588.8 square foot structure) in a platted subdivision in the A (Agricultural) zone district. The parcel of land is described as Lot 7, Block 4, Ranch Eggs Subdivision, Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is approximately 1/4 mile east of Weld County Road 7; north of and adjacent to Lowell Lane (3313 Lowell Lane) . This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by September 9, 1992, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Keith A. Schuett, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: 3. 1/ We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Please refer to the enclosed letter. h �v Signed Agency: '1J Ir Date: �j ` / — SEP 0 1 1992 rL Weld County Planing 921099 2 0 WI DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES _.-- PHONE(303)3584000,EXT.4400 ik i 915 10th STREET GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 Ill COLORADO - August 26, 1992 CASE NUMBER: USR-984 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from Joseph A. and Allana M. Reider for a Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a structure larger than 1500 square feet (4588.8 square foot structure) in a platted subdivision in the A (Agricultural) zone district. The parcel of land is described as Lot 7, Block 4, Ranch Eggs Subdivision, Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is approximately 1/4 mile east of Weld County Road 7; north of and adjacent to Lowell Lane (3313 Lowell Lane) . This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by September 9, 1992, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Keith A. Schuett, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it LJ _ does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: 3. )( We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Signed: ,/�t/ Agency: 9�'SO/CCeti Date: 08,22 A- 921099 rt(17;3/44.:\\:' DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE(303)3564000,EXT.4400 915 10th STREET 11 I T GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 ll e • COLORADO . au. August 26, 1992 CASE NUMBER: USR-984 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from Joseph A. and Allana M. Reider for a Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a structure larger than 1500 square feet (4588.8 square foot structure) in a platted subdivision in the A (Agricultural) zone district. The parcel of land is described as Lot 7, Block 4, Ranch Eggs Subdivision, Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is approximately 1/4 mile east of Weld County Road 7; north of and adjacent to Lowell Lane (3313 Lowell Lane) . This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by September 9, 1992, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Keith A. Schuett, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: 3. X We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our J/�\ interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Please efer to the enclosed letter. �/ Signed: `� Agency: C.. / T 1t/ of ergo/F/t� Date: Q u Tyr SEP 011 1`9992 921099 r..) Pia tillt-74;>0 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE(303)356-4000,EXT.4400 915 10th STREET GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 COLORADO August 26, 1992 CASE NUMBER: USR-984 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from Joseph A. and Allana M. Reider for a Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a structure larger than 1500 square feet (4588.8 square foot structure) in a platted subdivision in the A (Agricultural) zone district. The parcel of land is described as Lot 7, Block 4, Ranch Eggs Subdivision, Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is approximately 1/4 mile east of Weld County Road 7; north of and adjacent to Lowell Lane (3313 Lowell Lane) . This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by September 9 , 1992, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Keith A. Schuett, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town - for the following reasons: 3, xxxx We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. //P le se refer to the enclosed letter. Signed:/`) Ronald Hovland Agency: (';ry of Thnrnrnn fn • reeve-1e�ment p men Date: September 1, 1992 SEP 0 3 1992 921099 ° — Weld County Planning 107-0 :70 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE(303)3564000,EXT.4400 I 915 10th STREET GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 1111 C. COLORADO August 26, 1992 CASE NUMBER: USR-984 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from Joseph A. and Allana M. Reider for a Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a structure larger than 1500 square feet (4588.8 square foot structure) in a platted subdivision in the A (Agricultural) zone district. The parcel of land is described as Lot 7, Block 4, Ranch Eggs Subdivision, Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is approximately 1/4 mile east of Weld County Road 7; north of and adjacent to Lowell Lane (3313 Lowell Lane) . This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by September 9, 1992, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Keith A. Schuett, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request _ (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: 3. We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Please refer�t�o the enclosed letter. �] / QJ Signed: Ci a /45. CSLf lyl& Agency: (A/M. Oni.. _ _4 T l Date: %/911,411,12.6r 2 0RZ g 0 4 1992 Weld Coaaty Planning 921099 M O reRlk C TOWN OF ERIE 645 HOLBROOK OK P.O.BOX 100 * ERIE,CE,COLORADO 8051516 >\ /p � 828-3843 \ i 665-3555 U74 A •,ry42 it September 17 , 1992 Weld County Department of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Attn: Keith A. Schuett Dear Mr. Schuett: The Town of Erie has no objection to the project described in referral case number: USR-984 . We are pleased to cooperate with our neighbors by supporting land uses that improve the quality of life in this area. Sincerely, S ott A. Hahn/f7Zn, Town Administrator SAH:mc 921099 POLICE DEPT. METRO449-3156 LOCAL828-3200 P.O. BOX510 LONGMONT FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 666-4404 fitThcr _DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES • • PHONE(303)3584000,EXT.4400 - •�_` I 91510th STREET ' I 1 GREELEY,COLORADO 80831 ail COLORADO August 26 , 1992 CASE NUMBER: USR-984 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from Joseph A. and Allana M. Reider for a Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a structure larger than 1500 square feet (4588.8 square foot structure) in a platted subdivision in the A (Agricultural) zone district. The parcel of land is described as Lot 7 , Block 4, Ranch Eggs Subdivision, Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is approximately 1/4 mile east of Weld County Road 7; north of and adjacent to Lowell Lane (3313 Lowell Lane) . This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by September 9 , 1992, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Keith A. Schuett, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request _ (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: 1 . 3. ` We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: cdt 11011 5, j .¢f=_ -e refer to the enclosed letter. � �,� ,../) Lir r I V4:2( 41-. Ae-nn Signed Agency: OCT t 3 1992 • ��_ Date: /_• � C-"+ Woid County Planning 921099 61, DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE(303)358-4000,EXT.4400 91510th STREET GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 C. COLORADO September 11, 1992 Joseph A. and Allana M. Reider 3313 Lowell Lane Erie, CO 80516 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Reider: Thank you for your letter of August 24. The Board of County Commissioners has approved your request to issue a building permit prior to approval of a Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit. The Board' s approval is conditional upon the following: 1. All activities and construction conducted on the property is at your own risk; 2. The only permitted work is for that work which is described on the issued permit; 3. You will comply with all conditions of approval identified through Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review permit application processes; 4. All construction shall be in accordance with the requirements of the Weld County Building Code Ordinance. 5. You will comply with any other County, State, or Federal requirements which may apply to the use of the property; and 6. If the Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review permit are not approved, you will be responsible for removing any improvements not authorized under the existing zoning district. If you have any questions about this matter, please call me. Sincerely, V,-05)(a__,0^-L\AJL,/ Chuck Cunliffe, AICP Director �p pc: Board of County Commissioners 921099 Cry ham -J r) , ca,✓r Cub 224.4 ['nap g oz.2.4 ( p nM d Ow Fete Ua.nm L t'- L crua Sfite n Ipe ,,2n./2.a-,-1 c.vf L a_e zcJ . -CAD to-e o±Jw + a ,ac Goa , CA--)-Q b a h" "" 'an,e c) .LA C c q c z.- d - . nw> ,dire_---- —___ J wn 9.7L ov. --L +-As cy (-) 1‘.-9 - -w;c f Qt-Z.,nLett w,r� ._ • ISO Ld2z (co • • SIH t4 • Weld Col*Planning._ -321029 -_- AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF COLORADO ss COUNTY OF WELD I,KEITH HANSEN, of said County of Weld,being duly sworn,say that I am publisher of rar. _ate Cave'��.'.lms_. > 0r+sa a WINDSOR BEACON +Moilu rl:a qr doped proG,y.+ramototraar'awi a a weekly newspaper having a general circulation in said Riveter:Jae lrr Mira County and State, published in the town of WINDSOR, r'a in said County and State; and that the notice, of which wawa laaw a an 4. Nook tip smrrrr.us Goa the annexed is a true copy, has been published in said Oatweekly for... /__successive weeks, that the notice WCMMISITT PROPOS Aranrar,al OS, was published in the regular and entire issue of every SWING bolo= �. moonumber of the paper during the period and time of "r'r°a publication, and in the newspaper proper and not in a 1000a Maenad supplement, and that the first publication of said notice INS Orillool *sr PP btorrislarlair was in said paper bearing the date of the Illson Mr is pro Is toil mirsidlOrelboo+w /D day of a,QiOf1-n.,.�/ , A.D., 19 `]�—and Must, new the last publication bearing the date of the lot MOM sword 00C o+�rMI ah▪lrrerol: IDYS Mar INK Si Soda day of A.D., 19_ and earn INK M Me atthat the said WINDSOR BEACON has been published +a IN continuously and uninterruptedly for the period of 5 r +rEMa NOSY w riaY7r consecutive wSekts,in said County and State, prior to the se lo:at�iir`"ra date of first publication of said notice, and the same is a araar au,,ro wr S olt •ars• newspaper within the meaning of an Act to regulate my Tana araaeraw printing of legal notices an advertisements, approved • YYgo..rY May 18, 1931,and all prior is r as in force. MI MS r a.wl rrr+r"in P LISHER Subscri d d swyn to before this •K / day of 19l • OTARY BLIC My commission expires 7J • 9:21 1"5 ypnCi OF w1LIQ AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Map n1e weld O°'"ti PiningSTATE OF COLORADO Commldalon will hold a Octt10 heating on T ss oeteba 0. NOS at tart COUNTY OF WELD pm. tor the purpose el 0 giant Plan and a SPINS Review permit nor I,KEITH HANSEN, of said County of Weld, being duly the property described sworn,say that I am publisher of below. Approval of the request nay asas avant property right pursuant M WINDSOR BEACON Calends APPLICANT: Josdph A. a weekly newspaper having a general circulation in said ind Alo ald ` County and State, published in the town of WINDSOR, LEGAL DESCRIPTION: tat in said County and State; and that the notice, of which 7. Block Subdivision.' Ranch CouatE�i the annexed is a true copy, has been published in said Cdoredo. weekly for_t___ successive weeks, that the notice TYPE 010 INTENSITY OF was published in the regular and entire issue of every PROPOSED USE: A number of the paper during the period and time of structure larger then 1100 publication, and in the newspaper proper and not in a squire test(468.8 aquas tea structure)in a aimed supplement, and that the first publication of said notice, subdivision in the A was in said paper bearing the date of the gyrbwaagtaadlmkl P P LOCATION:Approximately 3 day of /-t v..ki,e.r , A.D., 1947,' and 114 mile east of Weld Monty Rood`north ot� the last publication aring the date of the adjacent (9919 Lowell Wry. day of , A.D., 19_ and SIZE:6.0 area,more or that the said WINDSOR BEACON has been published continuously and uninterruptedly for the period of 5 The public hewing will be consecutive wwegs,in said County and State, prior to the held in the Weld Coady Commissioners'Heating date of first publication of said notice, and the same is a Room.Fora Floor, Wald newspaper within'the meaning of an Act to regulate County Centennial printing g of legal notices an advertisements, ap proved ▪ Tent Wrest.Oriole" Colorado. Commons a May 18, 1931,and all prior is r as in force. objections related to the o beys equal should be • e ubndttsd in writing to the Wald Coady Duparmue at Planing Services. Ill Tenth Street,Room sag, P LISHER Grassy.Colorado SOan. before the above dam or presented at the Puffs Subscri +it to before)e this �' / day Irraq an Oatsba0.1tItof 19 Capavailable for pugs �L-G.mac.-•impection in the Depateara � ct Plonna1 00"i NO' RY PU IC 942. Weld COasOy Centennial Center, $11 >> Tenth Street. Greeley. 7) -��, ��- Cabrado soot•Photo• My commission expires :, 9664000.ESNS=4410. JudyYamepelt Chaffin n Weld County PlaniS CmreatMan MINIM In let -_ Semen Sepleabw a, tlea. • 921099 • tl DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE(303)356-4000,EXT.4400 in ID 91510th STREET GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 C. COLORADO September 4, 1992 TO: SURROUNDING PROPERTY/MINERAL OWNERS CASE NUMBER: USR-984 The applicant has requested that the October 6, 1992, hearing date be changed to October 20, 1992. Therefore, the public Hearing before the Weld County Planning Commission will be on Tuesday, October 20, 1992, at 1:30 p.m. , in the County Commissioners' Hearing Room, First Floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado concerning the request of: NAME: Joseph A. and Allana M. Reider FOR: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a structure larger than 1500 square feet (4588.8 square foot structure) in a platted subdivision in the A (Agricultural) zone district. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 7, Block 4, Ranch Eggs Subdivision, Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: Approximately 1/4 mile east of Weld County Road 7; north of and adjacent to Lowell Lane (3313 Lowell Lane) . Your property is within five-hundred (500) feet of the property on which this request has been made. For additional information write or telephone Keith A. Schuett, Current Planner. 921099 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING I hereby certify that I have placed a true and correct copy of the surrounding property owners and owners and lessees of minerals in accordance with the notification requirements of Weld County in Case Number USR-984 for Joseph A. and Allana M. Reider in the United States Mail, postage prepaid First Class Mail by letter as addressed on the attached list. this 28th day of September, 1992. 921093 SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS AND/OR INTEREST/SUBSURFACE ESTATE OWNERS Joseph A. and Allana M. Reider USR-984 Richard Cosslen c/o Longmont National Bank 5th and Coffman Longmont, CO 80501 John R. and Rosemary P. Murphy 3363 Lowell Lane Erie, CO 80516 Wendell D. and Arlene A. Stahl 3410 Johnson Lane Erie, CO 80516 Clayton C. and Sherri Struble 3310 Johnson Lane Erie, CO 80516 Daryl L. and Linda M. Phipps P.O. Box 524 Erie, CO 80516-0524 William C. and Kathleen A. Hoffman 3210 Johnson Lane Erie, CO 80516 Estol Rockwell 3213 Lowell Lane Erie, CO 80516 Robert J. and Ardith L. Mady 3263 Lowell Lane Erie, CO 80516 921099 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE(303)356-4000,EXT.4400 91510th STREET GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 111 ig C. COLORADO August 26, 1992 Joseph A. and Allana M. Reider 3313 Lowell Lane Erie, CO 80516 Subject: USR-984 - Request for a Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a structure larger than 1500 square feet (4588.8 square foot structure) in a platted subdivision in the A (Agricultural) zone district on a parcel of land described as Lot 7, Block 4, Ranch Eggs Subdivision, Weld County, Colorado. Dear Mr. and Mrs. Reider: Your application and related materials for the request described above are in order at the present time. I have scheduled a meeting with the Weld County Planning Commission for October 6, 1992, at 1:30 p.m. This meeting will take place in the County Commissioners' Hearing Room, first floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado. It is recommended that you and/or a representative be in attendance to answer any questions the Planning Commission members might have with respect to your application. It is the policy of Weld County to refer an application of this nature to any town or municipality lying within three miles of the property in question or if the property under consideration is located within the comprehensive planning area of a town or municipality. Therefore, our office has forwarded a copy of the submitted materials to the Town of Erie, and the City' s of Thornton, Broomfield, and Northglenn Planning Commissions for their review and comments. Please call Scott Hahn, in Erie, at 665-3555; Kirk Oglesby, in Broomfield, at 469-3301; David Callahan, in Thornton, at 538-7295, and Jerome Starling, in Northglenn, at 450-8743, for further details regarding the date, time, and place of these meetings. It is recommended that you and/or a representative be in attendance at the Erie, Broomfield, Thornton, and Northglenn Planning Commission Meetings to answer any questions the Commission members may have with respect to your application. It is the responsibility of an applicant to see that a sign is posted on the property under consideration at least 10 days preceding the hearing date. Sometime prior to September 24, 1992, you or a representative should call me to obtain a sign to be posted on the site no later than September 26, 1992. The sign shall be posted adjacent to and visible from a publicly maintained road right-of-way. In the event the property under consideration is not adjacent to a publicly maintained road right- of-way, the applicant shall post one sign in the most prominent place on the property and post a second sign at the point at which the driveway (access drive) intersects a publicly maintained road right-of-way. Your sign posting certificate must be returned to the Department of Planning Services' office on or before the date of the hearing. 921.099 Joseph A. and Allana M. Reider USR-984 Page 2 The Department of Planning Services' staff will make a recommendation concerning this application to the Weld County Planning Commission. This recommendation will be available twenty-four (24) hours before the scheduled hearing. It is the responsibility of the applicant to call the Department of Planning Services' office before the Planning Commission hearing to make arrangements to obtain the recommendation. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to call me. Respectfully, AteetetZfee.t.e<"7r urrent Planner KAS/sfr 921099 THE SIGN SHALL BE POSTED ADJACENT TO AND VISIBLE FROM A PUBLICLY MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY. IN THE EVENT THE PROPERTY UNDER CONSIDERATION IS NOT ADJACENT TO A PUBLICLY MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, THE APPLICANT SHALL POST ONE SIGN IN THE MOST PROMINENT PLACE ON THE PROPERTY AND POST A SECOND SIGN AT THE POINT AT WHICH THE DRIVEWAY (ACCESS DRIVE) INTERSECTS A PUBLICLY MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SIGN POSTING CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER THE PENALTIES OF PERJURY THAT THE SIGN PROVIDED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES WAS POSTED ON THE PROPERTY AT LEAST 10 DAYS BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS HEARING FOR CASE # THE SIGN WAS POSTED BY: fie) NAME OF PERSON POSTING SIGN SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT STATE OF COLORADO ) d.,L au der ) SS. COUNTY OF-W tD ) / SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO ME THIS / y/I,DAY OF �� c ibs,_ - , 19 9 . SEAL J - 7 -14.06-610, - NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES F - - 73 • LAST DAY TO POST SIGN IS: OA, 1 ('? PLEASE RETURN THIS FORM TO THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES' OFFICE ON OR BEFORE THE DATE OF THE HEARING. 921099 USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW APPLICATION Department of Planning Services, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado 80631 Phone - 356-4000 - Ext. 4400 Case Number L! S/I / ej Date Received Application Checked by Mylar plat submitted Application Fee OO ?1-,�,_2 Receipt Number 1 S 7,Zj Recording Fee Receipt Number TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT: (please print or type, except for necessary signature) I (we) , the undersigned, hereby request a hearing before the Weld County Planning Commission concerning the proposed Major Facilities of a Public Utility Special Review Permit on the following described unincorporated area of Weld County, Colorado: LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT AREA: ►Jct39 Section 3Y Tw&1 N, RNc to`d W LEGAL DESCRIPTION of contiguous property owned upon which Special Review Permit is proposed: -3'-fNo.:.4 Section 34 TwP1 N, RN66SW Property Address (if available) 33i3 LOLA≥ _t..< Ls-1, E.2tE , Co TOS/c, PRESENT ZONE # 62ICu t_x tRE OVERLAY ZONES TOTAL ACREAGE G.O PROPOSED LAND USE 416eJ Gu Ltu fit. EXISTING LAND USE R 6 2s CttL(u.aF SURFACE FEE (PROPERTY OWNERS) OF AREA PROPOSED FOR THE USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT: Name: -Sosat-1 e 4 ALcA+JA M ��IDE2 Address: 33(3 Gau%Fi-L &U City Cti ¢ Zip 8ost6 Home Telephone # (;.(,S —1005 Business Telephone # 21'i -9ss S Name: h.)/ }/f Address: City Zip Home Telephone # Business Telephone # APPLICANT OR AUTHORIZED AGENT of different than above) : Name: Address: City Zip Home Telephone # Business Telephone # 'I List the owner(s) and/or lessees of mineral rights off} 1Qjl� properties of record. A4UG1 2 5 1992 Name: (tilctiO k, Address: City + Wa$ 1L— w©►acoo Name: rj Address: �._ City Zip hereby depose and state under the penalties of perjury that all statements, proposals and/or plans submitted with or contained within the application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. COUNTY OF WELD ) STATE OF COLORADO ) ";=.2.`"L'_ls2 ' / �� coG`. Signature: Owner or Authorized ze Agent Subscribed and sworn to before e this aY/`'day of C�2-e -/- 19 9Q 4-.1.2�-iui NOTARY PUBLIC My commission expires re - t) - 57 ,3 tk AUG 2 5 tyy_._ Weld Vg9ning Description of Proposed Operation ;i.se,:1... a. .:':_: . er and Allena '1, l' eeee. eee reeuestind ; L 9,,: ..t.. i - tern .. ( ' y r o. will i l y as - s��e permit f s:�r' ,t �'.. ., . ... 'i- _ :}t:)a r_. -=,i,...+i The .._ . a (�.C? hay L:t;7: .......,_, � �!k.�• for approximately ... ;..:In of hay. It will have two stalls fo:' horses and the remainder will be an indoor-` riding arena. We need the area as we have Four- horses and space enclosed with fence for only two. As recreation , we want to ride the horses more in the winter and the indoor area will allow this. Finally, we have no where to store the hay for cur" horses and the barn will fulfill this need . S'uer.cuno i:i!~. our property , three lots to the west is a feed mill . Directly east of that is a large chicken barn. The property next to us on the west has lean . +r� with a horse property.y on cur side a small �.t-��F"a }.L) t��:.r .i wit •_-h i",Jr vE' and the �?r _. C.r'�. has alarge• barn used primarily for storage . In front of US to the '≥4outh is all farm land and to the north of us within 500 ft three people have barns with horses, one person has a barn with llamas, and one section is vacant . Our proposed structure would be approximately 450 ft from the home on the west , approximately 150 ft from the home to the east and 700 ft to the home to the north . The maximum number of users of the structure would be three, myself , my ;husband and in the future my six month oid son. We would be the only ones esing it .. There will be no persons employed her-'e. There will be no water- in the structure. The only access route to the barn will be off of Lowell Lane. There is no sewage facility to the barn as oi.lr house is on the same property. To prevent fires, we will install fire extinguishers at both ends of the barn . There will he ventilation through the two stalls which will have runs off of them. They will far-c' west and north . There is also a dojrd:••. on the north that opens in order to stack hay inside. ir-tadditicn , the entire south and 1/3 of the west side will be oper .. There will be a small amount. if horse mature that will tnat will come out of the barn. It will not be stockpiled . It would b':-:` used as fertilizer around the house. Regarding storm water retention see attached diagram. The barn will be equiped with gutters. The storm water will be drained into the pond on the east side of the barn , through a system cT downspouts . See attached letter from tnri.neer-. There :is no debris , ,Junk or wastes associated with the 'ear-'n . Since this is a pole barn , there will be no landscaping or erosion control measures ned esssary. We Will USE this structure the entire time we J. ive at 3311 Lowell in , thus there is no need for reclamation pr'o[:edur's. Sec attached for a t;.t"le schedule for comaietion. This barn is ._onsistarit with Weld County comprehensive plan iii that the barn will only be e ed lot- hay storage, riding and horse._.. We id 1_;: .. -1t-y s plan is to r'-eITia+.n agricultural , which the above listed uses ar"e. Also the barn ';';ill not destroy any agricultural gal larici since ..t: is or our o'r opeety which is in a subdivision . We are oors:Lsant ' i a:.h the intent of the district for the same reasons. It. states in the intent "the he A d i' tri:.:t . . . to provide areas -For the conduct of agricultural actI.vi.t.I . . . t' his barn with horses and hay, provides for dos"i':.:!._tlt._!!`ai activities. .tt also states that it is to " . . ..provide areas for the conduct of uses by special re's i w which have been determined to be more inte•rtse . . . than uses allowed by right . " This allows us to apple for the use of a barn of this :size .. Once again , we 921099 i are destroying no agrcultural land , thus no efforts are necessary to conserve productive a:gricult.Lir'al. land . The only potentiall. danger to the .. l , �'._.'•:i.C I.1 S._: _i".. F- .. •i: :p1:"'t �? the '� 1 '_ (horses ) got _}<:% Iiot !" .,_. .r.:7.'.�l'I�fk7r .._ _.t., � _ t,{`:' ....(" '_�� _Y}';:f.3fir_a..�. I'. ._ ._ ._ i ,1.... _ lose, We have the pn:eposeC barn in an area '`•:'.h•=tt has fencing all ar"ut.;nd it cm if horses got lose theycould not at off r property."`t s stated a. 1C,.�__ get our ._t .._,(^.rC-.'4 ;r. As _k�_ __l L previously, 4•J].1.�!�!i.f"i{_I 500S'•t'. .�i�` our j property, five lots nave t_)a1"'i barns and horses, one lot ha a barn and llamas, one lot has only a modular home •:tnd one lot ha.5 a barn for _ tu:''a j e but. no animals except a dog . We feelthat a barn for hay and two horses as wel11 as an areana would Fir in well . The barn is cornpat.able with the Future development of the area and comprehensive plan of the county in that it is agricultural . WE].d county considers agriculture their most valuable resource and want agr'icultur'e to remain in the county. CUr- barn will do that . Keith Schuett , Current Planner of Weld County verified that the barn would not be in a flood plain , yr-_clor iic hazard or in a Weld Count' Airport overlay district . Once agaifl there is no water in the barn and there will be no excessive noise from the barn . This has also been waived by the planning department . l:naddition it is our desire to keep the area around Ranch Eggs Estate agricultural bec:uase we enjoy the benefits of agriculture in Weld County. 921.099 (�11tEL CALCULATION SHEET BEiv r HOUSTOO,TEX S.BOX 87G7252-2166 CALC.NO. SIGNATURE DATE A��'��Z- CHECKED DATE PROJECT , - 12x'.1 o_r----' JOB NO. SUBJECT -E9 �t SHEET OF SHEETS 1 2 (A ,ice 0,64.-PAA.4„vo-r-6 3 5 'W-4-4-v-‘454- ('''''e-C-1---16,61.j 7 R5-F-- A-1 -1-7 . 9C-.) e r 1 5.-* t -z" -4-L4-e-Cyc i.,t_s_p I-0 10 11 12 13 14 15 � 16 TA 1\1,-)AA Ls ? -a,i tnck5 (.4It,7) 17 18 _ ,3] 19 2.O 21 22 It '. Dakrfir- .--DreGt.4-virie Crl1Tirlda 23 24 1.--4CLbd�` 25. ' r, ii/JJJ L Iti S 25 .. 26 lei l-A. 28 L..71)e LO/X 4..�. f. gal' r+-3 / 29 30 112-x _A-3 4- Ini° A-3 • 31 UL'sV `74:71".14"--- �l/'Q-4,�_ 32 ,,.- cTh ) Pte- ,., I.(.17) 2-1,-r-- 33 -i--- 34 �.35 I . kick t?c...,,„.yer"..-'r_____ 36 r- a v_(, x.:1099 HO-90101 O0/81) R.73W. R.72V- I R.71 W. I R.70 W. R.69 W. r....-1••••••••••••�� . 0h .NAGE CRITERIA MAtUAU \ •Cr in "al` lro s 100 year N? LENS AR' .. 24 hour rainfall • LONG • T •. _ . • Arid 4 p 1.31 r ll j , Ni' 0 . . . e r I GRAPHIC SCA MAX. I \ you 'j��, ( IsohYsfa I Lines in 4.9 BOULDER I R.68 W. R.6T W. W R.66 R.65W. rev �..�.� ,,.. R.6a LAF•YETTE ( / ' • BRIG ! sou., Cr IS L E 0 / r MIN. • -- ELDORA00 PRINGS R•• FIE f Q./ 3.4 0 1 3• ' • 1 I - HE r - • w \ 'Us. NTON �� .7.6, \ Ralsto�„nm o^� IT 8 _ �s < �• .- MIN5TE ' ..DERBY-3.75 /{/' S. . - A... " a til -1 ..- ! •a �. y., 1r S ' h ' Clear .. S - S,0 tv�che5 'N.. \ ' l'144.7* _ ..�.. WATKI r • too �r Z4 �iP� �— u� 3 a e�+ Naphn TL�t5 2 TA S. i - " �` AURORA • �* ^_ I > GI 4 ;®. 1 r � .s R.S. . carn"or� • �sy � D R ¢ Swinitr0t T.SS • e o n EVERG �. _. h T wax `YS G24/ 35 '( / Vii T.6S. •• IFS- • R RN h MAX. S - 5.4 » tn c. , SEDALIA T.75. h --- . T.75. Nor , 11 iT __i\.. { i 4� T.B S. TLE d lj ^ Its.4: a • •'F T ' '\ } �,r 1t`... 4. „ T.95. yN %.MIN. DEdc41 a 9S tA'-L105. I .b I L O S a T. 0-15 - 69 - PA MER •KE �•. R.71 W. R.70 W. R.69 W. R.G8 W. + R.67 W. R.66W. " ir..w I oq�i.7�.Q� 151 , RATIONAL METHOD R""JFF COEFFICIENTS C a U• ° v Description of Area Runoff Coefficients !. V M a L y E to em ,.. Business: o — c 1 ° Downtown areas 0.70 to 0.95 ` a 0 u Neighborhood areas 0.50 to 0.70 V O la. V m « .. Residential : e m gg" o. Single-family areas 0.35 to 0.50 ° L. S Multi units, detached 0.40 to 0.60 o .. Multi units, attached 0.60 to 0.75 11r « 0vs s- 44Residential (1/2 acre lots or more) 0.30 to 0.45 0 u m " 0 • - am Apartment dwelling areas 0.50 to 0.70 40 v « u v mol %. O , c o 60 vol o. at— Industrial: a f « „ _ " „ Light areas 0.50 to 0.80 o, ' C I m • Heavy areas 0.60 to 0.90 _ _ o C € a 3 '. _ _ m r > Parks, cemeteries 0.10 to 0.25 L « V 4 M M-c c °� 3 F Playgrounds 0.20 to 0.35 0 I4. ii" v; a °c Railroad yard areas 0.20 to 0.40 O - 1. 0 0 C « = 0 ea a Unimproved areas 0.10 to 0.30 9 6 . - c 5 o t It is often desirable to develop a composite runoff coefficient based > u u 2 " on the percentage of different types of surface in the drainage area. c' v v u c u " This procedure is often applied to typical "sample" blocks as a guide va Y.° " - to selection of reasonable values of the coefficient for an entire r e L. C r ,- area. 1- a b. « ,.. u RATIONAL METHOD RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS FOR COMPOSITE ANALYSIS J Character of Surface Runoff Coefficients I U Streets: J Asphaltic 0.70 to 0.95 oConcrete 0.80 to 0.95 Pu `11.— _ - Drives and Walks 0.75 to 0.85 °C Roofs 0.75 to 0.95 0 u. c Lawns, Sandy Soil : o Flat, 2% 0.05 to 0.10 C Average, 2 to 72 0.10 to 0.15 w. Steep, 72 0.15 to 0.20 m > u W Z > a Lawns, Heavy Soil : 3 L i e 0 •N ,or, 8 Flat, 22 0.15 to 0.20 I u " Average, 2 to 72 0.20 to 0.25 N Steep, 72 0.25 to 0.35 The coefficients in these two tabulations are applicable for storms of 5-year to 10-year frequencies. Less frequent higher-intensity storms will require modification of the coefficient because infil- tration and other losses have a proportionally smaller effect on runoff, as given In the following section. 921099 T L MA ..4.4t1e , 3uL scar P WAIL PU L R -t~S t M©, FPM Sta ?IF 8W I-PI LICE Ptigwl ►� 921099 I I 1 .t {1 it I , It 4. k: N Department of Planning Servicesiii. ' Weld County 915 10th street Greeley, Co 80631 Dear Sirs: Joseph and Allana Raider, the owners of Lot 7, Block 4, Second Filling, Ranch , Egg Estates Subdivision, Erie, Co., have made application to the North Huron ., , Water Company, Inc., for a water tap. The application has been approved and we have agreed to include them into our system and serve them with water. Sincer y, w tea . Eileen Perachbacher Ii Secretary, No. Huron Water Co., Inc. • a ` beet (6• tos /6 i ) , t ". 921099 ` ` . No._ B 1208 REC 02154933 09/08/88 16 : 10 $3 . 00 1/001 !Atj 1S4Ii3 u- F 1913 M-RY ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK & ='CORDER WELD CO, CO • AI w1 �.,�5H WARRANTY DEED m .'` RELOKUEK'S STAMP0 N THIS DEED, Made this a - day of September . 1988 0D 1"' " between J O (w •WILLIAM L. HART State Dcaunsi:. r�lnry Fee M 4' s' b n Dote rC cs Ip, ofihc X X X 'County of Weld and State of $ c� ' Cif III' Z f I! S' Colorado, grantorls), and Z to m PI 1 • l> JOSEPH ALEXANDER REIDER and ALLANA MARIE REIDER I; N r� to cl m ,0 Et o whose legal address is c/o D. L. Perschbacher, 3411 Johnson Lane, Erie, Colorado 80516 y ° I H N H N Z � of the X x x County of Weld and State of Colorado, grantees: n co WITNESS, that the grantor(s), for and in consideration of the sum of N Twenty Thousand and 00/100 ($20,000.00) DOLLARS, '. x o the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, ha s granted, bargained, sold and conveyed, and by these presents R .. do es grant,bargain,sell,convey and confirm unto the grantees,their heirs and assigns forever,not in tenancy in common but !, to in joint tenancy, all the real property together with improvements, if any, situate. lying and being in the X X X County [tri I of Weld and State of Colorado, described as follows: n • O d t1 in k Lot 7, z w ' l i Block 4, v10 t-,li RANCH EGGS, INC. , SUBDIVISION, FILING NO. 2, f � • a Sul-division of WELD COUNTY , ti EXCEPT all gas, oil and other mineral rights o which are hereby reserved to the above—named Grantor, William L. Hart n o Oi—, Ialso known by street and number as (vacant land) I • TOGETHER with all and singular the heredit:mment% and appurtenances thereunto belonging, or ill anywise appertaining, the reversion and reversions,remainder and remainders, rents, issues and profits thereof, and all the estate,right, title, interest, claim and demand whatsoever of the grantur(s), either in law or equity, of, in and to the above bargained premises, with the hereditaments and I! appurtenances. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises above bargained and described,with the appurtenances,unto the grantees,their heirs and assigns forever. And the grantor(s), for himself his heirs and personal representatives do es covenant, grant, bargain and agree to and with the grantees, their heirs and assigns, that at the time of the caseating and delivery of these presents he is well seized of the premises above conveyed,ha S good,sure. perfect,absolute and indefeasible estate of inheritance,in law,in fee simple,and ha s good right,full power and lawful authority to grant,bargain,sell and convey the same in manner and form aforesaid, and that the same are free and clear from all former and other grants, bargains, sales, liens, taxes, assessments,encumbrances and restrictions of whatever kind or nature soever, except easements, rights—of—way, ,,restrictions, reservations of record, if any, and subject to oil and gas lease re— corded offT//{ 6/8/84� under Reception 1969888, and Lease With Option To Purchase re- ..core:led 91030/86 ug1dw.Tl' o-fi RzNlfkl 71 q 1 g (. d aim I chvL is vLFLNU the above-bargained premises in the quiet and peaceable I i possession of the grantees, their heirs and assigns, against all and every person or persons lawfully claiming the whole or any part 1 '� thereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the grantor(s)ha S executed this deed on the date set limb abgvc,, ! William L. paait by I. K. Hoyle i STATE OF COLORADO 921099'> SS. '11.7x7 County of IiOUhlar whose legal address is c/o D. L. Perscbhicher, 3411 Johnmn lane, Erie, Colorado 80316 11 .- of the X X X County of Weld and State of Colorado, grantees: t WITNESS, that the grantor(s), for and in consideration of the sum of t I Twenty Thousand and 00/100 ($20,000.00) DOLLARS, I, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, ha s granted, bargained, sold and conveyed, and by these presents r I I do es grant,bargain,sell,convey and confirm unto the grantees,their heirs and assigns forever,not in tenancy in common but I in joint tenancy, all the real property together with improvements. if any, situate, lying and being in the x x x County t- of Weld and State of Colorado, described as follows: :1 C Lot 7, 7 2•GZ) Block 4, RANCH EGGS, INC. , SUBDIVISION, FILING NO. 2, t a Subdivision of WELD COUNTY , H EXCEPT all gas, oil and other mineral rights r which are hereby reserved to the above—named Grantor, H William L. Hart (C. also known by street and number as I (vaca nt t land) I� TOGETHER with all and singular the hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto belonging, or in anywise appertaining, the reversion and reversions,remainder and remainders,rents, issues and profits thereof, and all the estate, right, title, interest,claim and demand whatsoever of the grantor(s),either in law or equity. of. in and to the above bargained premises, with the hereditaments and , I appurtenances. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises above bargained and described,with the appurtenances,unto the grantees,their heirs and assigns forever. And the grantor(s), for himsel f . his heirs and personal representatives do es covenant. grant, bargain and agree to and with the grantees, their heirs and assigns. that at the time of the ensealing and delivery of these presents he is well seized of the premises above conveyed, ha S good.sure,perfect,absolute and indefeasible estate of inheritance,in law,in fee simple,and ha s good right,full power and lawful authority to grant,bargain,sell and convey the same in manner and form aforesaid, and that the same arc free and clear from all former and other grants, bargains, sales, liens, taxes. assessments, encumbrances and restrictions of whatever kind or nature soever, except easements, rights-of-way, restrictions, reservations of f record, if any, and subject to oil and gaslease re corded on 6/8/84 under Rece ion 1969888 and Lease With Option To Purchase re-car4ied 9,30x86 under rcegpt}µ''O 714 I' a gran tuts shall and will wANNAN I'AND l' hvu< DGhI.ND the above-bargained premises in the quiet and peaceable i' possession of the grantees, their heirs and assigns, against all and every person or persons lawfully claiming the whole or any part thereof. • IN WITNESS WIIEREOP the grantor(s)ha s executed this deed on the date set fifth above • i6-1 --'v`vw d . — Williatn L. l3Yt by I. K. Hoyle I STATE OP COLORADO 1I ss. ' County of Boulder f o.,d The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 2 day of September , 19 88 , I by I. K. Hoyle as Attorney-In-Fact for William L. Hart. My commission expires her '25 , 19 88 . Witness my hand and official seal. ; 0' • ltyCommission£ipi Oc -t a8tpl -- 1 ' & J< q:: r-� nary Public ^' Zr p Q' NGar en Center Broomfield, Colorado 80020 ' u If in Denver,m.insert"City and.' - X • No.921.Rev,5.86, WARRANTY DEED Ito Joint Tenant') Bradford Pohliehing.5525 W.6111 Ave,Lnkewrx,d,CO 50214-0011 211.000 921O99 "' LD COUNTY, COLORADO, SOUTHERN PAR 43 livestock and wildlife share the range. Livestock watering ing. The grass selected should meet the seasonal require- facilities also are utilized by various wildlife species. The ments of livestock. It can be seeded into a clean, firm cropland areas provide favorable habitat for pheasant and sorghum stubble, or it can be drilled into a firm prepared mourning dove. Many nongame species can be attracted seedbed. Seeding early in spring has proven most success- by establishing areas for nesting and escape cover. ful. The underlying shale is the most limiting feature of Windbreaks and environmental plantings of trees and this soil. Neither septic tank absorption fields nor sewage shrubs commmonly grown in the area are generally well lagoons function properly. In places the underlying shale suited to this soil. Cultivation to control competing has high shrink-swell potential. Environmental and beau- vegetation should be continued for as many years as tification plantings of trees and shrubs can be difficult to possible following planting. Trees that are best suited and establish. Capability subclass IVe irrigated, VIe nonir- have good survival are Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern ated• Loam Plains ranee sit . redcedar, ponderosa pine, Siberian elm, Russianolive, and 6--Ulm clay loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes. This is a hackberry. The shrubs best suited are skunkbush sumac, eep, well drained soil on plains at elevations of 5,075 to lilac, Siberian peashrub, and American plum. 5,200 feet. It formed in alluvial and eolian sediments from Wildlife is an important secondary use of this soil. The shale. Included in mapping are small areas of soils that cropland areas provide favorable habitat for ring-necked have shale between 40 and 60 inches. Also included are pheasant and mourning dove. Many nongame species can small areas of soils where the surface layer and subsoil be attracted by establishing areas for nesting and escape have been recharged with lime from irrigation. cover. For pheasants, undisturbed nesting cover is essen- Typically the surface layer of this Ulm soil is brown tial and should be included in plans for habitat develop- clay loam about 5 inches thick. The subsoil is brown and ment, especially in areas of intensive agriculture. Range- pale brown clay about 14 inches thick. The substratum to land wildlife, for example, the pronghorn antelope, can be a depth of 60 inches is clay and clay loam. attracted by developing livestock watering facilities, Permeability is slow. Available water capacity is high. managing livestock grazing, and reseeding where needed. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Surface This soil has poor potential for urban and recreational runoff is medium, and the erosion hazard is low. development. Slow permeability and high shrink swell In irrigated areas this soil is suited to all crops com- cause problems in dwelling and road construction. Capa- monly grown in the area, including corn, sugar beets, bility subclass Ile irrigated, IVe nonirrigated; Clayey beans, alfalfa, and small grain. An example of a suitable Plains range site. cropping system is 3 to 4 years of alfalfa followed by 67—U m c ay am, . 0 5 percent slopes. . is is a corn, corn for silage, sugar beets, small grain, or beans. deep, well drained soil on plains at elevations of 5,075 to Land leveling, ditch lining, and installing pipelines are 5,200 feet. It formed in alluvial and eolian sediments from needed for proper water applications. shale. Included in mapping are small areas of soils that All methods of irrigation are suitable, but furrow ir- have shale between depths of 40 and 60 inches. Also in- rigation is the most common. Barnyard manure and com- eluded are small areas of soils where the surface layer mercial fertilizer are needed for top yields. and subsoil have been recharged with lime from irriga- In nonirrigated areas this soil is suited to winter wheat, tion. barley, and sorghum. Most of the acreage is planted to Typically the surface of this Ulm soil is brown clay winter wheat. The predicted average yield is 28 bushels loam about 5 inches thick. The subsoil is brown and pale per acre. The soil is summer fallowed in alternate years brown clay about 12 inches thick. The substratum to a to allow moisture accumulation. Generally precipitation is depth of 60 inches is clay and clay loam. too low for beneficial use of fertilizer. Permeability is slow. Available water capacity is high. Stubble mulch farming, striperopping, and minimum til- The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Surface lage are needed to control soil blowing and water erosion. runoff is medium, and the erosion hazard is moderate. Terracing also may be needed to control water erosion. In irrigated areas this soil is suited to the crops com- The potential native vegetation is dominated by monly grown in the area. Perennial grasses and alfalfa or western wheatgrass and blue grama. Buffalograss is also close grown crops should be grown at least 50 percent of present. Potential production ranges from 1,000 pounds the time. Contour ditches and corrugations can be used in per acre in favorable years to 600 pounds in unfavorable irrigating close grown crops and pasture. Furrows, con- years. As range condition deteriorates, a blue grama-buf- tour furrows, and cross slope furrows are suitable for row falograss sod forms. Undesirable weeds and annuals in- crops. Sprinkler irrigation is also desirable. Keeping til- vade the site as range condition becomes poorer. lage to a minimum and utilizing crop residue help to con- Management of vegetation on this soil should be based trol erosion. Maintaining fertility is important. Crops on taking half and leaving half of the total annual produc- respond to applications of phosphorus and nitrogen. tion. Range pitting can reduce runoff. Seeding is desirable In nonirrigated areas this soil is suited to winter wheat, if the range is in poor condition. Western wheatgrass, barley, and sorghum. Most of the acreage is planted to blue grama, sideoats grams, buffalograss, pubescent winter wheat. The predicted average yield is 28 bushels wheatgrass, and crested wheatgrass are suitable for seed- per acre. The soil is summer fallowed in alternate years 921099 1 §& {i r, z "S`8 fi'. 67 K y Y,r"^''d' S , �,'. "r' . cep' u x a S? "x,'11.'if'” gm ,,�` 't 777 Y .,4,..--I':.1.— t f, p h T Lrr s. � a < 4e 1yy,^, S°t v'IOY t sJ; _ �1 a61Y,n 1 A 6 � .� ° �Sf 3'. dq. y w j x1 , .f� �� , Y. M ttl'S � f �- �F r f �` t'' t �� k � °bti S't a"y � "' -,'4‘n1/4,;',''' k�^� +$�•\�<�� ,.. h i c 4 . 83M1 '� ;13-47-9*,7 / 'J alkikeV� �,67.,,.k_ .. ' _ N7 k ' Mr:„ .7 r„. 4 n 4e� R �—? s f t r �y ' 1 JM Y / '+,Al t z lirer. &6 r 41 41,;1`;:":;:::,"..","s , I xatili K .� ;x �`it�'r , ' ""41'7- ,. K°^w' ��`'•,: '^T{ i� r Y B `� �9 .79,-y� ��g"r ^4 vwm� r �V"' J _ tii, bf�{ j'k✓} _ ,,.. . ., 'y 1 A&N� 1/4. j� � 4 79 't1i . ,,.4.„1„.,..3 24,,,e/4„ � ,y �"'ern �� AA�-, ...v., 1 n ,,, ,: v ,tiaY wager t1 40 I,it'rle 6�1� ��- { 379 two 4:Iv-xt1 a f �. e; 66 t y Yd M yew Pitt' -I1,1--.4:"\\.,,, \ /�. ( t r 9 4 e..`5� Y • .r "iii 67 A et 40 r 67 �+ 56 ad efk• per/ .;997 ''-t 'f ..L6 e. 7 x Jaf S s �i 4f ' ` 66 r d' r," -h� w+; fh" 3te.�fn +M ¢ i Ttt { "l 6fi _ r Nt.°f,�3 3 $ MOB re"< / �e R jt (/ -9"..L.:-;°•:,:",`".- $ r,Y [ �^. 0'4 ;LA .7,,r1"1", ti' � 'Tk„,..„,,,,,ii.;Yt '+'r~e rteH +f' 7 'e a. 'I"af�w ab. t ro �, '�kv ��y `n * Fyl .® f 8 �q#r.a 'a i li ( �* {"� 68+ t .�Y`Y ALs� ,Y .tr P Lts.L�`vey" •i I$ t 1'S,k.`'` ^� rt IL"— ary J 4 ,k v +,. ft ia' ,ifl �,."�"m.' i.t: Yak \ k � ', W h' rYa! i f'- 'Y1`� ti l 04 4' 4);"3'. • ) J * 4 Y2'%'T�1�je 67 `6 4 Mi'r t r:% 4 'I� f • a { dt 4'en � — r S '1 i a 40 p ) `t • 9Oj ''"'",;*.lo r'-'''' G' a / + l rt 7,,.f ,. `� - .v`: .r.n —if yyyy CS'00 -- This map is compiled on ?974 aenal =�-5 n 4 OGO photography o° the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Son onservation Service and cooperating agencies 9; 1.033 AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS MINERALS AND/OR SUBSURFACE ESTATE Application No. Subject Property .Lo+ 1 , &0ctc `{ ) -- A.vC=N £66 EsmrE St.8Dt'i5'04 f i u .J 6 t t uo _a. CUcaiu STATE OF COLORADO ) ss COUNTY OF WELD THE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn, states that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names and addresses of all mineral owners and lessees of mineral owners on or under the parcel of land under as their names appear upon the records in the Weld County Clerk and Recorder's Office or from an ownership update from a title or abstract company or an attorney. The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me this V" day of ( Cc , 1922, WITNESS my hand and official seal. My Commission Expires: - 9£ aL6.uL 61' Notary Public 921039 ti rci( DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE(303)358J000,EXT.4400 1119 91510th STREET GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 C COLORADO August 26, 1992 CASE NUMBER: USR-984 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from Joseph A. and Allana M. Reider for a Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a structure larger than 1500 square feet (4588.8 square foot structure) in a platted subdivision in the A (Agricultural) zone district. The parcel of land is described as Lot 7, Block 4, Ranch Eggs Subdivision, Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is approximately 1/4 mile east of Weld County Road 7; north of and adjacent to Lowell Lane (3313 Lowell Lane) . This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by September 9, 1992, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Keith A. Schuett, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: 3. We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Signed: Agency: Date: 921099 Hello