The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About921525.tiff I( MAR 1 ?J 1992 C5 ------, BY SPECIAL REVIEW APPLICATION ,4( - Department of Planning Services, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado 80631 Phone - 356-4000 - Ext. 4400 Case Number Date Received Application Checked by Mylar plat submitted T Application Fee Receipt Number tf i](t -1 µ tl ll Recording Fee Receipt Number 12 1E COMPLETED Ai ApPT?(:ANT: (please print or type, except for necessary signature) I (we) , the undersigned, hereby request a hearing before the Weld County Planning Commission and Weld County Board of County Commissioners concerning the proposed Use by Special Review Permit on the following described unincorporated area of Weld County, Colorado: Part of the East i LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT AREA: wk swI.; Section 25 T 2 N, R 68 W - LEGAL DESCRIPTION of cont .g ous property owned upon which Special Review Permit is proposed: Etqa LueSection �F T �N, R 68 W Property Address (if available) 5129 WCR 16 Longmont, Co. PRESENT ZONE USR-537:85:14 OVERLAY ZONES TOTAL ACREAGE 40 PROPOSED LAND USE Airport & Museum EXISTING LAND USE Airport & Museum SURFACE LIE (PROPERTY anaiill OF AREA PROPOSED FOR IHL USE hi SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT: Name: James M. Mrpona]d Address: p-0. Box 646 City Frederick Zip 80530 Home Telephone # 833-4029 Business Telephone # N/A Name: Address: City Zip Home Telephone # Business Telephone # APPLICANT OR AUTHORIZED AGENT jjf different than above) : Name: Address: City Zip Home Telephone 1J Business Telephone # List the owner(s) and/or lessees of mineral rights on or under the subject properties of record. Name: James M. McDonald Address: P.O. Box 646 City Frederick Zip 80530 Name: Amoco Oil Address: 200 E. Randolph Dr. City Chicago Zip 60601 I hereby depose and state under the penalties of perjury that all statements, proposals and/or plans submitted with or contained within the application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. COUNTY OF __WELD____) STATE OF COLORADO ) ture: Owner or Authorized Agent r Subscribed and sworn to before me th's day of / ,7n,e --„c 19h/ . r°�jvi�i / /4/K °h �E b NAIFY PUBLIC / /J My commission expires /7,--.2-57.5-- 9Z1 5z 920572 APPLICATION 2. a. Our hope and intent is to eventually have 50% of the 40 acres as a museum and 50% as an airport to accommodate our friends and neighbors who fly as well as our flying museum displays. In the mean time, it is a private airport, collectible museum, jump zone, screened aircraft salvage as well as other accessory items related to the airport and museums All types of aircraft operate here, including but not limited to airplanes, hot air balloons, helicopters, spray planes, gliders and ultralites. The jump operations include, but are not limited to jumping out of airplanes, balloons and other aircraft , off towers, cranes and similar structures using parachutes, bungee cords and other devices to insure the safe landing of the individual . Jump areas, as indicated on plot plan map, are for all types of jumping. However, the jump areas will not be used for more then one type of jumping at one time, to insure the safety of the participants. Wings ' N Things Museum and Airport has workshops in which to repair, build and store usable and static displays which include but are not limited to; aircraft , automobiles, trucks, motorcycles and scooters, tractors, farm implements and machinery, pickups, tractor trailers ( for mobile display) , trains and historical buildings, some of which include but are not limited to; log cabins, an old school house,a church, a frontier fort , a telegraph office, a bank , etc. Display pedestals are not necessarily to be in the positions shown, but will always be at least 50' from the runway centerline. The position these buildings are shown on the plot plan are not necessarily the position they will be shown in when erected and some will probably be moveable, and will be at least 50' from the runway centerline. The map indicates a fence and bushes around the perimeter. This will probably never be installed around the whole perimeter however, we wanted it on the map in case we ever wanted to do one or the other. We will install fences as necessary to screen unrestored items. The first fence will be for unrestored museum displays along the west fence and will be completed within six months and will run along the west boarder from the south end of 320572 the -xisting fence to the corns, of the existing 120' x 52' building with fencing to be added as necessary. The fence will be of the type on which we can hang collectibles and have pictures painted . It will be constructed of 3/8" plywood or metal ; the same as which is used for metal buildings. The new fence will start 8" above ground (per Weld County Planning Department, and we would like to reserve the right for discussion on this matter at our hearing ) with a 2' space between fence and collectibles, leaving room for the sheep to graze for weed control . The new fence will be installed within six months and will be used to screen some of the unrestored museum collectibles. At some time we may plant bushes or trees along part or all of the West boarder. The existing chain link fence area ( which is approximately 144' x 138 ') at the SW end of the property will be used as a special attraction area for rare displays which are not completely restored because parts are not available, including but not limited to the helicopter, missile, WWII fuselage and army vehicles. This will be the only area where unrestored displays are located which are not visually screened from all adjacent properties and road right sways. . We have been collecting for a display of engines (gas, diesel , stream, etc . ) . For the small engines, we have a 45' x 9 ' 6" mobile display trailer. For larger engines, other types of protection will be fabricated . We also have a 34' x 8' mobile display trailer for local fly-in display exhibits. These trailers, when not in use, will be kept in the storage yards. We have a military display which includes but is not limited to all types of aircraft ( airplanes, helicopters, gliders, etc. ) , military vehicles, military tents and other military memorabilia. We have several pieces of airport and museum maintenance equipment some of which serves two purposes; it is usable as well as for museum display. There is storage, tie down and a fuel truck on site with aircraft, car and machinery fuel available. There will also be museum collectibles on consignment for display ( not for resale) . 920572 We r.an to have a home here evt...tually and an old style barn. When we discontinue use of the mobile home as living quarters, we will continue to use it as housing for a caretaker and office space. Museum pieces as well as maintenance equipment are sometimes traded or sold to upgrade display attractions and equipment . However, this is not a large part of our operation. Within the next year , we would like to erect the 100 x 50 building Just north of the existing 120 x 52 building. We would also like to put in a pool during this time period . Within the next one to five years, we hope to erect the small hangers. b . This has been an airport since the 1930' s and a Jump zone since the late 1960' s. I started fulfilling my dream for a museum collection years ago and now hope to give it my full attention. My wife; Sharon and I travel all over the country locating, purchasing and transporting collectibles for our museum. c. There are several neighbors to the west : 1 ) operates a parachute Jump operation and totally depends on this airport to make a living for his family and has operated here for more than twenty years. 2) is a commercial truck driver and often has his tractor and trailer parked at his house. 3) works away from home ( vocation unknown) and doesn' t use his land for any particular purpose. 4) is retired and has horses, cows and goats ( his wife drives a school bus) . 5) is retired and spends a lot of time working on his airplane and uses this airport for flying. 6 ) has a commercial auto repair shop on the property and has cows and horses. 7 ) purchased his home and land here for the express purpose of operating a non-profit organization; he and his wife restore older aircraft and train pilots and mechanics for service in humanitarian and mission oriented groups. At this time they have ceased their operation at the airport pending their application for a special use permit . d . North - no residential structures for more than .5 mile ( my property line is next to the back fields of the residents who live on WRC 11 ) . South - no residential structures for several miles. East - a mobile home is appx. .5 mile then commercial buildings appx. 1 mile away. 920572 e. The maximum number of users, patrons, members and buyers would remain at 200. f. The number of employees in approximation would be six to eight , number of shifts is one, with hours of operation from daylight to sunset or 8:00 p .m. , whichever comes first. g. Water source is a system and water tanks. h . Access is gained from road 16 and has two ( 2) gates which are kept locked for security and public safety. When the museum is open for display, access and supervision will be provided . i . Vehicular traffic would remain at 100. j . Sewage facilities will be septic tanks and santi— lets as have always been sufficient and should continue to be sufficient since the number of users has not changed . k . For fire protection we have a 3500 gallon portable tank as well as two additional water tanks for future use. 1 . Livestock will not exceed the number allowed . m. We have an eight yard rubbish truck . n. We have no problems with storm water retention, if one arises we will install a retention pond . o. Debris, junk and waste are disposed of once a month, or as needed . p. Erosion control is aided by vegetation cover and has been determined by Richard Mullaney with the Soil Conservation Service that this will be adequate with two sheep for grazing . q . My intention is to always keep this as an airport and museum and jump zone. r. The airport and museum and Inmp zone are all in use now. 3. a. At the time Weld County was zoned , it was determined that it met the Weld County comprehension plan. (See Exhibit Al b. It was determined by the Planning Commission that the proposal is consistent with the intent of the 320.7;2 agri..ultural zone district and .s provided for as a Use by Special Review. c . N/A d . We comply with Federal FAR flight regulations and have a letter in file from Laura Littrell of the FAA. e. It was determined by the Planning commission that the activities and improvements proposed will be compatible with existing and future uses in the neighborhood , (See Exhibit A) . Existing land uses are listed in 2c ( page 1 ) . f. As the County is developed , it would be advantageous to county residents to have an airport and museum in this location. g . No Overlay districts affect the site. (See Exhibit A) h . We have a 3500 gallon storage tank and system on the property. i . See Exhibit A. J . It has been determined that the noise level complies with regulation #CRS 25-12-13. k. See Exhibit c . 1 . See attached . m. See attached . /I /1 NOTE: Unrestored items as referred to in this application which will I be screened is refering to items which are not visually pleasing. Some items which may not be completely restored but appear in tact will be displayed without being screened. 920 ! OPERATION STANDARDS 1 . The users permitted shall be an airport for no more than twenty-five airworthy aircraft ( excluding museum displays) and antique and collectible museum. Structures and future structures are as follows: Five museum storage and workshop buildings. a house, and old style barn ( or replica of old style barn) an accessory mobile home used as an office and residence, twenty-five hangers, one shop and trailer used in conjunction with the jump operation, fifteen storage sheds, a display of historical buildings ( log cabin , school house, church , telegraph office, weather reporting station, etc . , display pedestals will be in various locations on the property and necessary enclosed storage areas for airplane salvage, unrestored collectibles ( not on display) and associated parts . These uses are described in application materials filed with the Department of Planning Services. 2. The use by Special Review Permit area shall have a reasonable effort put forth to control soil erosion and the growth of noxious weeds. 3. One toilet is provided per each hundred persons. 4. The accesses for the airport from Weld County Road 16 to the site shall be maintained . 5. The hangers shall be used for storage, maintenance, and repair of aircraft and museum displays and airport vehicles and equipment . 6 . Hours of operation for the airport shall be from dawn to sunset or eight p.m. , whichever comes first. 7 . Trash and refuse shall be removed from the property regularly. All trash not removed shall be stored in an enclosed container to prevent blowing of refuse onto surrounding properties. 8. There will be access available to the airport for the following adjacent properties at the airport owners option: 7462 WCR 11 ; 5053 WCR 16 ; 5059 WCR 16 . The accesses may be used for ingress and egress for aircraft and vehicles. The property owner( s) and/or operator( s) of the airport shall be responsible for maintaining the fence and keeping it in good repair and free of debris. 9 . A sign shall be placed on the property containing the limitations as to use, including hours of operation and number of airworthy aircraft permitted . 32Ov'77 10. The parki..g for 100 vehicles shall rL ..ain the same. Other parking areas may be allocated for the use of the operations of the aircraft in storage and in the hangers. 11 . The building and fuel storage plans shall conform with the Longmont Fire Protection District requirements. 12. A storage tank of sufficient size to hold 3,500 gallons of water shall be maintained on the property for fire protection of the property. The storage tank has had the approval of the Longmont Fire Protection District. 13. The gas pumps shall be approved by the Longmont Fire Protection District . 14. Junk aircraft , and miscellaneous parts and other Junk and accessories, shall be stored within the screened area provided by the solid security fences. The security fences shall also enclose all aircraft salvage parts and museum collectibles not yet ready for display. Some will be displayed unrestored because parts are no longer available due to rarity. This will be the only area where unrestored displays are located which are not visually screened from all adjacent properties and road right aways. 15. The property owner and or operator of this operation shall be responsible for complying with all of the above stated Standards. Noncompliance with any of the above Standards may be reason for revocation of the Permit by the Board of County Commissioners. 16 . The applicant shall comply with the design standards for the Use by Special Review, Section 24.5 et seq . , of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 17 . The applicant shall comply with the design standards for the Use by Special Review, Section 24.6 et seq. , of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 18. Representatives or members of the Weld County Health Department, Longmont Fire Protection District , and Weld County Department of Planning Services shall be granted access onto the site at any reasonable time by appointment only (due to theft , we would prefer no one comes on the property without advanced knowledge and one of us being present during inspection, for the safety of the inspector as well . ) ; in order to insure the operations carried out on the site comply with the Operation Standards stated hereon and all applicable Weld County Regulations. 9201;72 \ USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW APPLICATION \LtIC:CCT,1:::9:92:13 Department of Planning Services, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado 80631 Phone - 356-4000 - Ext. 4400 Case Number Date Received Application Checked by Mylar plat submitted Application Fee ;0O Receipt Number Is:2in Recording Fee Receipt Number TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT: (please print or type, except for necessary signature) I (we) , the undersigned, hereby request a hearing before the Weld County Planning Commission and Weld County Board of County Commissioners concerning the proposed Use by Special Review Permit on the following described unincorporated area of Weld County, Colorado: Part of the East z LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT AREA: A SW Section 25 T 2 N, R 68 W LEGAL DESCRIPTION of rcronotJ yos property owned upon which Special Review Permit is proposed: Fty�jZSw, neu Section 25 T 2 N, R 68 W Property Address (if available) 5129WCR 16 Longmont, Co. PRESENT ZONE USR-537:85;14 OVERLAY ZONES TOTAL ACREAGE 40 PROPOSED LAND USE Airport & Museum EXISTING LAND USE Airport & Museum SURFACE FEE (PROPERTY OWNERS) OF AREA PROPOSED FOR THE USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT: Name: James M. McDonald Address: P.O. Box 646 City Frederick Zip 80530 Home Telephone # 833-4029 4s /432 Business Telephone # N/A Name: Address: City Zip Home Telephone a Business Telephone # APPLICANT OR AUTHORIZED AGENT Alf different than above) : Name: Address: City — Zip Home Telephone a Business Telephone # List the owner(s) and/or lessees of mineral rights on or under the subject properties of record. Name: James M. McDonald Address: P.O. Box 646 City Frederick Zip 80530 Name: Amoco Oil Address: 200 E. Randolph Dr. City Chicago Zip 60601 I hereby depose and state under the penalties of perjury that all statements, proposals and/or plans submitted with or contained within the application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. COUNTY OF WELD ) STATE OF COLORADO ) • ature: Owner or Authorized Agent Subscribed and sworn to before me th's day of (GT-4aEe 19y" zee," N A PUBLIC My commission expires //i,:,1-3- 2,±3-1 S Ova' APPLICATION 2. a. Our hope and intent is to eventually have 80% of the 40 acres as a museum and 20% as an airport to accomodate our friends and neighbors who fly as well as our flying museum displays. In the wean time it is a private airport, collectible museum and jump zone. All types of aircraft operate here, including but not limited to airplanes, hot air balloons, helicopters, spray planes, gliders and ultralites. The jump operations include but are not limited to jumping out of airplanes, balloons and other aircraft, off towers, cranes and similar structures using parachutes, bungee cords and other devices to insure the safe landing of the individual. Wings 'N Things Museum has workshops in which to repair, build and store usable and static museum displays which include but are not limited to; aircraft, automobiles, trucks, motorcycles and scooters, tractors, farm implements and machinery, pickups, tractor trailers (for mobile display) , trains and buildings, some of which include but are not limited to; log cabins, old school house, church, telegraph office, bant, etc. The position these buildings are shown on the plot plan are not necessiarly the position they will be in when erected and some will probably be moveable. We have been collecting for a display of engines ( gas, diesel, steam, etc. ) . For this we have a 45'x9'6" mobile display trailer. We also have a 34'x 8' mobile display trailer for local fly-in display exhibits. We have a military display which includes but is not limited to all types of aircraft (airplanes, helicopters, gliders, etc. ) , military vehicles, military tents and other military memorabilia. We have several pieces of airport and museum maintenance equipment some which serves two purposes; it is usable as well as for museum display. There is storage, tie down and fuel available. There will also be museum collectibles on consignment for display (not for resale) . We plan to have a home here eventually and an old style barn. When we discontinue use of the mobile home as living quarters, we will continue to use it as housing for a caretaker and office space. Museum pieces as well as maintenance equipment are sometimes traded or sold to upgrade display attractions and equipment. b. This has been an airprot since the 1930's and a jump zone since the (1) 7' a? 1960's and I started fulfilling ►my dream for a museum collection years ago and now hope to give my full attention. My wife, Sharon and I travel all over the country locating, purchasing and transporting collectivles for our museum. c. There are seven neighbors to the west: 1) operates a parachutte jump operation and totally depends on this airport to make a living for his family and has operated here for more than twenty years. 2) is a commercial truck driver and often has his tractor and trailer parked at his house. 3) works away from home (vocation unknown) and doesn't use his land for any paticular purpose. 4) is retired and has horses, cows and goats (his wife drives a school bus) . 5) is retired and spends a lot of time working on his airplane and uses this airport for flying. 6) has a commercial auto repair shop on the property and has horses and cows. 7) purchased his home and land here for the express purpose of operating a non-profit organization here; he and his wife restore older aircraft and train pilots and mechanics for service in humanitarian and ►mission oriented groups. At this time they have ceased their operation at the airport pending their application for a special use permit. d. North - no residential structures for more than z mile (my property line is next to the back fields of the residents who live on WCR 11). South - no residential structures for several miles. East - a mobile home is appx. i mile then commercial buildings appx. 1 mile away. e. The maximum number of users could be up to 1,000 per day as the museum progresses. f. The number of employees would depend on museum growth but could grow to 100 or more with hours of operation from daylight to sunset. g. Water source is a system . h. access is gained from road 16 and has two (2) gates which are kept locked for security and public safety. When the museum is open to the public, access and supervision will be provided. i. Vehicular traffic will consist mostly of passenger vehicles except for airport and museum equipment. Frequency of traffic will depend on museum popularity but could consist of 500 vehicles per day. j. Sewage facilities will be septic tanks and santi-lets. (2) k. For fire protection we have a 3500 gallon portable tank as well as two additional water tanks for future use. 1. Livestock will not exceed the number allowed. m. We have an eight yard trash truck. n. We have had no problems with storm water retention, if one arises we will install a retention pond. o. Debris, junk and waste are desposed once a month or as needed. p. Erosion control is aded by vegitation cover. q. My intention is to always keep this as an airport and museum. r. The airport and museum are both in use and the museum will grow over the years. 3. a. At the time Weld County was zoned, it was determined that it met the Weld county comprehensive pain. (See Exhibit A) . b. It was determined by the Planning Commission that the proposal is consistent with the intent of the agricultural zone district and is provided for as a Use by Special Review . (See Exhibit A) . c. N/A d. We comply with Federal FAR flight regulations. e. It was determined by the Planning Commission that the activities and improvements proposed will be compatible with existing and future uses in the neighborhood, (See Exhibit A) . Existing land uses are listed in 2c (page 1). f. As the County is developed, it would be advantageous to county residents to have an airport and museum in this location. g. No Overlay Districts affect the site. (See Exhibit A) . h. We have a 3500 gallon storage tank and system on the property. i. See Exhibit B. j. It has been determined that the noise level complies with regulation #CRS 25-12-13. k. See Exhibit C. 1. See attached. m. See attached. (3) 92r� 7?9LI .a a a OPERATION STANDARDS James M. McDonald 1. The users permitted shall be an airport for no more than twenty-five airworthy aircraft (excluding museum displays) and an antique and collectibel museum. Structures and future structures are as follows: Eleven museum display and workshops, a house, an old style barn (or replica of old style barn) an accessory mobile home used as an office and residence, forty hangers, one shop and trailer used in conjuction with the jump operation, twenty storage sheds, a display of old style buildings (log cabin, school house, church, telegraph office, weather reporting station, etc., display pedestals will be in various locations on the property and necessary enclosed storage areas for airplane salvage, unrestored collectibles (not on display) and associated parts. These uses are described in application materials filed with the Department of Planning Services. 2. The use by Special Review Permit area shall have a reasonable effort put forth to control soil erosion and the growth of noxious weeds. 3. One toilet is provided per each 100 persons. 4. The accesses for the airport from Weld County Road 16 to the sire shall be maintained. 5. The hangers shall be used for the storage, maintenance, and repair of aircraft and museum display possessions. 6. Hours of operation for the airport shall be from dawn to sunset. 7. Trash and refuse shall be removed from the property regularly. All trash not removed shall be stored in an enclosed container to prevent blowing of refuse onto surrounding properties. 8. There will be access available to the airport for the following adjacent properties at the airport owners option: 7462 WCR 11; 5053 WCR 16; 5059 WCR 16. The accesses may be used for ingress and egress for aircraft and vehicles. The property owner(s) and/or operator(s) of the airport shall be responsible for maintaining the fence and keeping it in good repair and free of debris. 9. A sign shall be posted on the property containing the limitations as to use, including hours of operation and number of airworthy aircraft permitted. 10. A parking area of sufficient size to park five hundred vehicles shall be located on the property. Other parking areas may be allocated for the use of the operators of the aircraft in storage in the hangers. Operation Standards Conk Jed 11. The building and fuel storage plans shall conform with the Longmont Fire Protection District requirements. 12. A storage tank of sufficient size to hold 3,500 gallons of water shall be maintained on the property for fire protection of the property. The storage tank has had the approval of the Longmont Fire Protection District. 13. The gas pumps shall be approved by the Longmont Fire Protection District. 14. Junk aircraft shall be stored within the screened area provided by the solid security fences. The security fences shall also enclose all aircraft salvage parts and museum collectibles not yet ready for display. Some will be displayed unrestored. 15. The property owner and or operator of this operation shall be responsible for complying with all of the above stated Standards. Noncompliance with any of the above stated Standards may be reason for revocation of the Permit by the Board of County Commissioners. 16. The applicant shall comply with the design standards for the Use by Special Review, Section 24.5 st seq., of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 17. The applicant shall comply with the Operation Standards for Uses by Special Review, Section 24.6 et seq. , of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 18. Representatives or members of the Weld County Health Department, Longmont Fire Protection District, and Weld County Department of Planning Services shall be granted access onto the site at any reasonable time by appointment only; in order to insure the operations carried out on the site comply with the Operation Standards stated hereon and all applicable Weld County Regulations. 19. The Use by Special Review shall be limited to the plans shown hereon and governed by the Standards as stated above and all applicable Weld County Regulations. Any major deviations from the plans and/or Standards shown or stated above shall require the approval of an amendment of the Permit by the Weld County Planning Commission before such changes from the plans and/or Standards are permitted. AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS SURFACE ESTATE Application No. Subject Property 51')C1 WC R IL STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. COUNTY OF WELD ) THE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn, states that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names, addresses, and the corresponding Parcel Identification Number assigned by the Weld County Assessor of the owners' of property (the surface estate) within five hundred feet of the property under consideration This list was compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor, or an ownership update from a title or abstract company or attorney, derived from such records, or from the records of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. The list compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor shall have been assembled within thirty days of the application' s submission date. nl C J The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me this L� • day 7'"TI,1F.e , 1961/, by u)�.,-,rs A�=-1) WITNESS my hand and official seal. MY Commission expires: /4C --1. 57:— , No fy Public /1 +� My Commission Expires : r"Ftd* FAMES OF OWNERS OF PROPERTY WITHIN 500 FEET Please print or type NAME ADDRESS, TOWN/CITY, ASSESSOR'S PARCEL STATE AND ZIP CODE IDENTIFICATION 1l Leslie & Aline Grisham P.O. Box 43 Firestone CO 80520 131325000006 Cecil S. & Michelle J. Miller 7402 WCR 11 Longmont CO 80505 131325000007 Donald D. & Shirley J. Gooden 7352 WCR 11 Longmont CO 80505 131325000008 Jon O. & Lori A. Foote 5059 WCR 16 Longmont CO 80505 131325000010 Edward A. & Carol L. Herson P.O. Box 27 Frederick CO 80530 131325000011 N. 6637 S. Island View Dr Ronald G. & Katherine M. Gaulte Watertown WI 53094 131325000013 Frank Munoz P.O. Box 494 Firestone CO 80520 131325000053 Charles L. & Denise Stewart 7200 WCR 11 Longmont CO 80505 131325000054 Russell G & Helen I Jubenville 7592 WCR 11 Longmont CO 80505 131325203003 Willie B. & Myrna Smith 1039 Gay St. Longmont CO 80501-4312 131325203004 Charles C. & Glenda M. Erskine " ft Patricia L. & Xi' iosigh L. R. Davis " " " " " U " " 6825 Tennessee #235 Dacona Inve9tmen- Co. Denver CO 80224 131336000019 3O AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS MINERALS AND/OR SUBSURFACE ESTATE Application No. Subject Property o, --/QC-7 L) C e �� STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss COUNTY OF WELD ) THE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn, states that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names and addresses of all mineral owners and lessees of mineral owners on or under the-parcel of land under as their names appear upon the records in the Weld County Clerk and Recorder's Office or from an ownership update from a title or abstract company or an attorney. The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me this �q C day of -/e2-/;de=/2- , 19fri. WITNESS my hand and official seal. My Commission Expires: /G-,.Zj .> .1)//77‘-. o ary Public / Mineral Owner , JAMES M MC DONALD 11940 W Independence Golden, Co 80401 LESSEE AMOCO OIL 200 E Randolph Dr Chicago, 111 60601 N-) 4t j.‘ (1-1- .=-C fl # 7 `` • The uiUDERSi9 /Jet /tic c 31-3o(es + O 7. 61 IDe pick- - I I-; ec i c,.) c" 17 irpo/e f N N D 1,01 ,vcI a TI., 41'9 M ,A5c-u. rri All A3rfc '�� .,!y�"�,v� th E (--) A OE 't o pro b ( c- ms mr 1-hc 'tr . c .* / Muse-- u. inn 1 1117;2 •�i +- hc I004 b (-4 iv j c-c _�un1 �) ; t v1 1JA.) 0 SC & /0o ti'(.2; ,4S ti' .�o ; n Lem it? iA. y -O A) /['E' voCA 'f"/De/ Of ,.CfsR irs37 1//9'71,' c /9 1�_ez e 5 v a Z G.rG,� 11 pt { "we) Mere Fa. }tits ayes C2L�C>zZ; . e ,)1/,x Gc'1 C 4�/ /' 0�-, / ,1kAl71 i 7.5 , `1/O/ " " A,,o�o l W.a inn t iced C .v1. (hit A l e 7 y63 L.3 oe // t� t-": akR s i ➢. a .b-c f t . wad cc-4'u.b....�i • tab- �.0 Ca.ili 41-4-1 chats Cat', Mut rut ctA3��f p _ 6,,,,./, ocVc,c,e9-?) 5973 tor, / 6 (-0-12 L. &cc< i-li., ct rc4-tti , 16r- e. / IJI L�— _ 5"._5 5.--i I/v ( 4pbQl�o-n6 (i ZLvrt �-f — /c NCcf0( c�0 'n --9JYIL9_ >3,,,,;‘ 5-0-1 Lt,, c , g la o Ilex / Yea. 90 cct VIA e O . 1-cat-2- St' c1 vi C.4 C.V I 1p 01C L6 e cu i-4 4 ji_t alts" 1 - „ efU-e Q 2( of --flu- (VA v tty `O`a't .. 4F-g lit . i)t r, r / ^ c' az, saav7n n et . Mee t /Y 14-)EA- 1l + +ce�e a``'cs 1 1533 - 3 `'� / A) i� /42 (k � c(' 1 �-7-N�' � ��4l DSNe — 60)(17: R (v.8s4,2 LJM'/ e 4 \,\,,,_4,1,\„:O.4_, 71 °)_ Let' s l ( U1 t L;tc \ ti SC ifX-Il�,� J -to ,I;(114 ` : /` (4ieirti, '2A 7_27 /e Fife/ ✓ 2e, fr .. . .... . . .. . .. . R17 ar a. 301; ? q 1 "f i To = W4,12.4 Cmu.t Corm n SrtutsQ Lug- lesio' Lt 41.O, erneb ed Wo I.t.Q.ct W- -to cp."( ctQ 0'h �'lu of rYa 11 'WiU OW' v`'lOYVIR, , lvhcin i.N Qrrk c k) t c , l `/ w or . 04 (Paz- n0ot cn a . Co nd(4ii on ( ` 'hat cund 4\ctiok j,nvsakt- a Jo+ mot -i_ in o �ot per -b an JceQain�ia� R 44 odd , !Lu.n - down , rQ ,e cts Wiz_097, 5 ' w -u ✓1gokvtJ1 cu-1 cAat Lek qrA.62. 1-1; a A w -CO) ef&t. )4 a £Z - O a v Pew -)t- 1Y\Zd can a,n d Lk1 ,Qnbper;K'tsn U skk e'i t-I,'cn tiovl AU. ) and u,d/ an ac i Y.Q. 4-0P11 emit- Qom- 4 M (iem vvkvintiuk Cwl u in/ tic-vv Opubtietuid gib 1 h 444 o r\a.u— t9At /1 ) nevi . rtia bz a ruipoi 1 EY1 i t) (49-47i919 coAcAge661 GUOaalk tAA5-Qf S20 2 • opiat okk 49- Aleita) pi's +4 cafigivc ✓li2,4-nciAn - ,.E (.l)zoit Co I u OJtru IN? CG mm. ;e-n � ant& Q _ �O6 ��? a f`A ac x R 8'z 2. ate �a >, , ,� -44Ag__ �-_-�' .� �� 4 /q61 ) - . S • t 2.40-24,...... C) rsti.9 . . .- • 735-2 i,z"CR2151: /1 _:> ' d O . . -_ . . 320579 LAND-USE APPLICATION SUMMARY SHEET Date: March 31, 1992 CASE NUMBER: Amended USR #537-3 NAME: James M. McDonald ADDRESS: 5129 Weld County Road 16 Frederick, CO 80530 REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and an Amended Special Review permit for an airport, open air museum, jump facility, and associated uses in the A (Agricultural) zone district. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The E2 W2 SW4 of Section 25, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: Adjacent to the Town of Frederick; east of Weld County Road 11, and north of and adjacent to Weld County Road 16. POSSIBLE ISSUES SUMMARIZED FROM APPLICATION MATERIALS: The criteria for review of this Special Review permit is listed in Section 24.3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. The Department of Planning Services' staff has received specific recommendations from the following: Office of Emergency Management Town of Frederick Tri-Area Planning Commission Mountain View Fire Protection District Weld County Engineering Department Weld County Health Department Federal Aviation Administration Letters and phone calls have been received by Department of Planning Services' staff from surrounding property owners regarding this case. 920572 _F 1 lYti..- ---�•i-�]] -t5Ya:ES t a as 1"uouM /11/ F� •..• � LIn• p II ° I CI .'• • I.? •••�� A 0lad./. . IS 1 _•_ _ . II • •• 0 •• 11 a• T [as 4 u 1 • zJw I�S4�a °e./.7---;'• n Yi r .. • _._ _ I :t,I., •01F • 91. • - 2 ,.�}c,tcR ' O • 0 N•! .. • pia I • -I _ _•_ • °I• •u •/��/1�jj•�� _ T_I •. •• • •i � T • °•_ � CREP� ��,'saw, • z z .E • � • L,Q 4i': I•� -- �— r •/ ) •) •••• • I t. 5 :. , I ' sY I . LfII, s I ; IIJ .x•� 1. .,� • I •46 •.a� Q I Y Il L•0A SO •r`,�` . . .. ..4...774 . ++ s ..L• (�~ .az• :I re.' 1.. •.,. ax .•L vi'( . • `l •50 IJ b I • 1V:00 )u° ixo. p 4\' r• i ul }}•� :{ Ii :J � : Ell/•:✓ / � �x` • ] �� ▪ •I R1 k,..r . 4I/ �• •_\ . •aa_• •I• Id I VV cen ��////// 1 __ 1• •• • is \ I Jx 'p,� I kdARBOUR 'ONO5. gl V 1• , -•�_ \ /I I SIATE REG • -i-- ( _ - J°. �:��• �. i� 1Jl.Ox' /./ o° r ] • • ] I. ¢ •-43 '. ] I n . J•;�� 1• • .•a0].0, . . IJ •� / ENCHANTS • .from a .. • ••�4•o• IF 1a\ ,Q • - / MILLI 1 '~ o �• 1 >\ xssuv •1 p • •tf CASA " 1 ° e trI _• °f�•wI �• ,] C a III ,. n �. vou... '� 27 > , �> .;i. F 1 I ..°8. i) ' ▪ YY S. •� �jI - 1• �! • I - — - — •IWR• - •..'� ----- • '=• -- - _ ▪ I N. --- -• •� ••� c. /._ `, _� 7•' • •Q ",�r••m: is • �, I `1.1 {[n' • „ I tie o `4 . ' }aj-a .°} r ). „ : I e ": 1.0 , _• v • ]\/ I/ �I�EJ • �a x•\ 1 Ir `I }l • I u Ir •I x. I ' 0A 1°f()• •:V[x, x• , i •, I , sroat �s i Y 5.1 I I • j ii!. . �_ _ • i 1 I oJ� _ J 1• _• Ip• t\ • o —• • [1 )�I a I • 9.-11.571,° P m EI )] ( I33 pt „_� ! IIJ'� , _. �■ :El�! tea: --_•i. •z' . 1 I. ,z z�P}� J•I ! •_._.' 1111 • i J '•_ 3) •E• • It 1� 1 I !•• //) --rrt.,i� • ' ORT LUPTON °a •/ • � I 1 O�✓O% I • Jx • / •u NN a . I •' o tua. li4 li US • _ ` � ,�rzi•_ _ - ►•m•x I ®•1•\ I� •I• �i_ '- ' •�_ 1 0 ! _•' � I•° I _-- I k •_ 'I _. j _ . ! - I --'-! , i 1 � r� °, �! _- 1I { \ I Ir-rki. 17•RIE� I •�!�ci I�'i i I�._._._ ._._._ ' _._ , _._ A • • . •\ I . _ . lll7%% 1 1�ro. .lo•0 11 •' 1 .L �_�-• �+1((�� •E _�.. •�{ - ._ _--. • in a.) N 1 if _ P I/ °r{ r ! J .1 pe' a • If..•s / ,Nor Y � ° ) E I , .:0r •'I• !� I•+.J. •I 01 z,(• 9' ^ 22 xl I zx x] • : n i xo •,• 1e ( x • /• x] a. • 0 9 Q 20 / I J I ! / l 1 for Tf NBEGG /l • o :I ;- - �I 0.0,3 %' •I'.� , II• �_.. u/1� • • i . 1• 'j1�'„�,'._,. lltsn,n l -n39 aI _ _ "f • , YL I. I.l . •• 4�F� , i1 1, n •\ ] IL • • � • z. F-,I✓ x n I z• • '] 30 ' z• 1 n `z. I • S 1 " n • •1led n 225Ire. '• S 1 >J• 13 • J _ 1 is ss ],0' ,•,)] J] )• )s • • ~��i11 loa ]. \• (r. I• [- ! EASE '• 1 ! ! . . . •Ir.. tl1:. a %%�'•a` I I., d ].a / if a R.68 • • Ai zo it 2 'd 1 1 .sew:"y ---t / a ;1. R.ssw. 1 — 2r. i 1 I _, ` i 7 0 Dail vSchr�l r I r .1— _ , — i -- 9 .Zr. : 20� M r\, \ 1EE1 cri / D _ �o Mine :�.-� � {� all ,�t`C,_.�a`S� �� - \ O '1 � t I -4s' ��4 L •,: Spy \�/A� _ 49 ttf r • � C/ �(C' , An: I rII �` • ` f �I:•.J� 1 r 5003 CJYD N- __— ssG�l� a , _ - - _ r i 1 r • V tir 0 t r Evan n _ 111 i '•••",:' — —� \ r I P{'�•Pu4Ding$t � R yo / ] I I 5050 �Tl'•CC �` og t .B ,L _/— 1 �� _ a I soap v_ / l ;x a nyi{ d II __� 5 . :• .en i f = , } 'a 1:)•:1[k7ct>2 J,•• 1•••-'. , f. J • IIrr �t t�Bzum Mine ---___H_,-----___H_,-- C Imo �� ri � • � \_ \ I� ; 1 , —1_2,® 2,• • " I i• ull ••-5282--- .- 1r •, Icic .t .�,• I 25---` � tr.A. Wit.,! e� �S 1 5000 ri � I er)Va u�y �i TM :+S` +.4 �' L/ 1-- . . LI` � -,-.-_, -.T.,-......4,1 4l Boulder Valle •me•e "�' 14. Shafikkiktiilt 44tR{{ ff y" tt,•;:i.' • • lr Si .../ if ' .... • r 't *1 s ;Ttr s ID ' wt — k. s. 2r4 7'" ''. yy ar _--.. "fR. — z • tr xa. t •. ys A :,y, and+ „ C �' 1 fit`» i ' ^In H i. ^�, L`#: f d.I. A ito4J' c/o'. . y .� A ,,,:./1„:- - R.O', 1 " 5 i t1 ifil 7: f i ° I s . . . __ „ .Li'', : " wie rt ii4 it 1= t-._ " i 920572 UNITED STATES ,J11 i : =0 S. r.7 h Avenue D: 'ARTMZNT OF 'C:! r(sarvav l orl D1r ; '7h I.tn, CO 00601 AGRICULTURE r Service Pnone 6_9-7004 .ti; V 3:tie: _4, : 7- 1 : a: .T:i . : Eases '1'_ _e 3.. . . 3 '. .' : . :iias . .., '/ 'wl .'ecuese _ _ C . ye v . . e Y.'i , 4G_ -_ v ..1 r : . . :s you '4-EC .. . .. _c S. 7 a : : : . : I. . =C.tE . se , , . ♦C N0V 1 0 1991 L Weld County Planning 920572 r 4 7 . r. i 6LL.-_,•VAN �, ,‘.0•-•..',.;,i.. 73 73 74 • 2C♦y 47 S I e� . 40 _ r E''2W 1z Sw `/y as - T2N- R- 48W • CO-CPa-1 U. S. Dept. of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service 4/32 (180-12-11) CCNSERVATIQI PLAN MAP AND SOIL AND CAPABILITY MAP LEGEND SHEET • Different kinds of soil, range sites, or woodland sites are separated on the map by solid black lines. Within each area is an identifying symocl or name. The following symbols are shown on your map: Soil descriptions 40—Nunn loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes. This is a deep, Management of vegetation on this soil should be based well drained soil on terraces at elevations of 4,550 to 5,000 on taking half and leaving half of the total annual produc- feet. It formed in mixed alluvium. Included in mapping lion. Seeding is desirable if the range is in poor condition. are small, long and narrow areas of sand and gravel Sideoats grams, little bluestem, western wheatgrass, blue deposits and small areas of soils that are subject to occa- grama, pubescent wheatgrass, and crested wheatgrass are sional flooding. Some leveled areas are also included. suitable for seeding. The grass selected should meet the Typically the surface layer of this Nunn soil is grayish seasonal requirements of livestock. It can be seeded into brown loam about 12 inches thick. The subsoil is light a clean, firm sorghum stubble, or it can be drilled into a brownish gray clay loam about 12 inches thick. The upper firm prepared seedbed. Seeding early in spring has part of the substratum is light brownish gray clay loam. Proven most successful. The lower part to a depth of 60 inches is brown sandy Windbreaks and environmental plantings of trees and loam shrubs commonly grown in the area are generally well Permeability is moderately slow. Available water suited to this soil. Cultivation to control competing capacity is high. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches vegetation should be continued fur as many years as or more. Surface runoff is medium, and the erosion possible following planting. 'frees that are best suited and hazard is low. have good survival are Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern In irrigated areas this soil is suited to all crops com- redcedar, ponderosa pine, Siberian elm, Russian-olive, and monly grown in the area, including corn, sugar beets, hackberry. The shrubs best suited are skunkbush sumac, beans, alfalfa, small grain, potatoes, and onions. An exam- lilac, Siberian peashrub, and American plum. ple of a suitable cropping system is 3 to 4 years of alfalfa Wildlife is an important secondary use of this soil. The followed by corn, corn for silage, sugar beets, small grain, cropland areas provide favorable habitat for ring-necked or beans. Generally such characteristics as a high clay pheasant and mourning dove. Many nongame species can content or a rapidly permeable substratum slightly be attracted by establishing areas for nesting and escape restrict some crops. cover. For pheasants, undisturbed nesting cover is essen All methods of irrigation are suitable, but furrow ir- tial and should be included in plans for habitat develop ment, especially in areas of intensive agriculture. Range rigation is the most common. Proper irrigation water management is essential. Barnyard manure and commer- land wildlife, for example, the pronghorn antelope, can be cial fertilizer are needed for top yields, attracted by developing livestock watering facilities. :dust nonirrigated areas are used for small grain. The managing livestock grazing, and reseeding where needed. soil is summer fallow•ed in alternate years. Winter wheat This soil has fair to poor potential for urban develop- is the principal crop. If the crop is winterkilled, spring ment. It has moderate to high shrink swell, low strength, .:beat can be seeded. Generally precipitation is too low and moderately slow permeability. These features create problems in dwelling and road construction. Those areas for beneficial use of fertilizer. that have loam or sandy loam in the lower part of the Such practices as stubble mulch farming, striperopping, and minimum tillage are needed to control soil blowing substratum are suitable for septic tank absorption fields and water erosion. and foundations. Some areas of this soil are adjacent to The potential native vegetation is dominated by blue streams and are subject to occasional flooding. The poten- grama. Several mid grasses, such as western wheatgrass tial is fair for such recreational development as camp and and needleandthread, are also present. Potential produc- picnic areas and playgrounds. Capability subclass Ile ir- Lion ranges from 1,600 pounds per acre in favorable years rigated, IIIc nonirrigated; Loamy Plains range site. to 1,000 pounds in unfavorable years. As range condition deteriorates, the mid grasses decrease; blue grama, buf- falograss, snakeweed, yucca, and fringed sage increase; and forage production drops. Undesirable weeds and an- nuals invade the site as range condition becomes poorer. 920572 32 SOIL SURVEY are Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern redcedar, ponderosa ble years to 1,800 pounds in unfavorable years. As range pine, Siberian elm, Russian-olive, and hackberry. The condition deteriorates, the sand bluestem, sand reedgrass, j. shrubs best suited are skunkbush sumac, lilac, and Siberi- and switchgrass decreasecrease. and nda b weeds lue grama, sand andsdropseesd, an peashrub. and sand sage Wildlife is an important secondary use of this soil. The the site as range condition becomes poorer. cropland areas provide favorable habitat for ring-necked Management of vegetation on this soil should he based pheasant and mourning dove. Many nongame species can on taking half and leaving half of the total annual produc- be attracted by establishing areas for nesting and escape tion. Seeding is desirable if the range is in poor condition. cover. For pheasants, undisturbed nesting cover is essen- Sand bluestem, sand reedgrass, switchgrass, sideoats tial and should be included in plans for habitat develop- grama, blue grama, and pubescent wheatgrass are suita- ment, especially in areas of intensive agriculture. ble for seeding. The grass selected should meet the Rapid expansion of Greeley and the surrounding area seasonal requirements of livestock. It can be seeded into has resulted in urbanization of much of this Olney soil. a clean, firm sorghum stubble, or it can be drilled into a This soil has good potential for urban and recreational firm prepared seedbed. Seeding early in spring has development. The only limiting feature is the moderately proven most successful. rapid permeability in the substratum, which causes a Windbreaks and environmental plantings are generally hazard of ground water contamination from sewage suited to this soil. Soil blowing, the principal hazard in lagoons. Lawns, shrubs, and trees grow well. Capability establishing trees and shrubs, can be controlled by cal- class I irrigated. tivating only in the tree row and by leaving a strip of 47—Olney fine sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slope's. vegetation between the rows. Supplemental irrigation This is a deep, well drained soil on plains at elevations of may be needed at the time of planting and during dry , 4,600 to 5,200 feet. It formed in mixed outwash deposits. periods. Trees that are best suited and have good survival Included in mapping are small areas of soils that have a are Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern redcedar, ponderosa dark surface layer. Some small leveled areas are also in- sine, Siberian elm, Russian-olive, and hackberry. The hrubs best suited are skunkbush sumac, lilac,and Siberi-eluded. Typically the surface layer of this Olney soil is grayish an peashrub. brown fine sandy loam about 10 inches thick. The subsoil Wildlife is an important secondary use of this soil. The is yellowish brown and very pale brown sandy clay loam cropland areas provide favorable habitat for ring-necked '- about 14 inches thick. The substratum to a depth of 60 pheasant and mourning dove. Many nongame species can inches is very pale brown, calcareous fine sandy loam. be attracted by establishing areas for nesting and escape Permeability and available water capacity are cover. For pheasants, undisturbed nesting cover is essen- moderate. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or tial and should be included in plans for habitat develop- more. Surface runoff is medium, and the erosion hazard is ment, especially in areas of intensive agriculture. Range- low. land wildlife, for example, the pronghorn antelope, can be In irrigated areas this soil is suited to all crops com- attracted by developing livestock watering facilities, monly grown in the area, including corn, sugar beets, managing livestock grazing, and reseeding where needed. beans, alfalfa, small grain, potatoes, and onions. An exam- Rapid expansion of Greeley and the surrounding area ple of a suitable cropping system is 3 to 4 years of alfalfa has resulted in urbanization of much of the Olney soil. followed by corn, corn for silage, sugar beets, small grain, This soil has good potential for urban and recreational or beans. Land leveling, ditch lining, and installing development. The only limiting feature is the moderately pipelines may be needed for proper water application. All rapid permeability in the substratum, which causes a methods of irrigation are suitable, but furrow irrigation is hazard of ground water contamination from sewage the most common. Barnyard manure and commercial fer- lagoons. Lawns, shrubs, and trees grow well. Capability tilizer are needed for top yields. subclass Tie irrigated, IVe nonirrigated; Sandy Plains In nonirrigated areas this soil is suited to winter wheat, range site. barley, and sorghum. Most of the acreage is planted to 48—Olney fine sandy loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes. winter wheat. The predicted average yield is 28 bushels This is a deep, well drained soil on plains at elevations of per acre. The soil is summer fallowed in alternate years 4,600 to 5,200 feet. It formed in mixed outwash deposits. to allow moisture accumulation. Generally precipitation is Included in mapping are small areas of soils that have a too low for beneficial use of fertilizer. dark surface layer and small areas of soils that have Stubble mulch farming, striperopping, and minimum til- sandstone and shale within a depth of 60 inches. lage are needed to control soil blowing and water erosion. Typically the surface layer of this Olney soil is grayish Terracing also may be needed to control water erosion. brown fine sandy clay loam about 8 inches thick. The sub- The potential native vegetation on this range site is soil is yellowish brown and very pale brown fine sandy dominated by sand bluestem, sand reedgrass, and blue loam about 12 inches thick. The substratum to a depth of grama. Needleandthread, switchgrass, sideoats grama, 60 inches is very pale brown, calcareous fine sandy loam. and western wheatgrass are also prominent. Potential Permeability and available water capacity are production ranges from 2,200 pounds per acre in favora- moderate. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or 9205?2 • • U. S. Dept. of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service 4/82 (150-12-11) CQiSERVATICt FLAN MAP AND SOIL AND CAPABILITY HA? Lam: ID SHEET Different kinds of soil, range sites , or woodland sites are separated on the map by scud black lines . Within each area is ar. identifying sirmo:.l name. The fcllewinc symbols are shown on your map: Soil descriptions 70—Valent sand, 3 to 9 percent slopes. This it a deep, Management of vegetation on this soil should be based excessively drained soil on plains at elevations of 4,650 to on taking half and leaving half of the total annual produc- 5,100 feet. IL formed in eolian deposits. Included in tion. Seeding is desirable if the range is in poor condition. mapping are small areas of soils that have lime within a Sand bluestem, sand reedgrass, indiangrass, switchgrass, depth of 40 inches. Also included are small areas of soils side-oats grarna, little bluestern, and blue grama arc suita- that have sandstone between 40 and 60 inches. ble for seeding. Because this soil is susceptible to soil Typically tile surface layer of the Valent soil is brown blowing, it should be seeded using an interseeder or the sand about 6 inches thick. The underlying material to a seed should be drilled into a firm, clean sorghum stubble. depth of 60 inches is brown sand. Seeding early in spring has proven most successful. Brush Permeability is rapid. Available water capacity is management can also help in improving deteriorated moderate. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or range. more. Surface runoff is slow, and the erosion hazard is Windbreaks and environmental plantings are generally low, not suited to this soil. Onsite investigation is needed to The potential vegetation is dominated by sand determine if plantings are feasible. bluestem, sand reedgrass, switchgrass, sideoats grama, Wildlife is an important secondary use of this soil. Ran- needleandthread, little bluestem, and blue grama. Poten- gcland wildlife, for example, the pronghorn antelope, can tial production ranges from 2,500 pounds per acre in be attracted by developing livestock watering facilities, favorable years to 1,800 pounds in unfavorable years. As managing livestock grazing, and reseeding where needed. range condition deteriorates, the sand bluestem, This soil has fair potential for urban development. The switchgrass, sand reedgrass, sideoats grama, and little chief limiting soil features are the rapid permeability and bluestem decrease, forage production drops, and sand the susceptibility to soil blowing. Septic tank absorption sage increases. Undesirable weeds and annuals invade fields function properly, but in places the sandy sub- and "blowout" conditions can occur as range condition stratum does not properly filter the leachate.. Sewage becomes pourer. lagoons must be sealed. Once established, lawns, shrubs, and trees grow well. Capability subclass Vle irrigated, VIe nonirrigated; Deep Sand range site. • .920572 ii. S. Dept. of Agriculture t- • CO-CPA-1 Soil Conservation Service 4/82 (180-12-11) CaSERVATIQ1 PLAN MAP AND SOIL AND CAPABILITY MAP LFI3FND SHEET Different kinds of soil, range sites, or woodland sites are separated on the map by solid black lines. Within each area is aD;dentifying symbol or name. The following symbols are shown on your Soil descriptions --- — 73-Vona'loamy sand, 3 to 5 percent slopes. This is_a Management of vegetation on this soil should be bases deep, somewhat excessively drained soil on plains and on See half and desirable leaving grf the ofthe range total al annual nu produc- high e formed in na at p its.4,6 0 to 5,200 feet. It Sand bluesgtem, sand 'reedgrass, switchgrass, sideoat: are eo eolian or alluvial as. d d. Includedre in l mapping ama ' bluegrarna, pubescent wheatgrass, and crestec soi some ae areas. Also included are small areas of wheatgrass e for ng. The soils that re n a loamy tosubstratum and some areas of s ould eet the seasonal requirements of livestock. It s ctee al soils that are noncalcareous ace layer ay a depth hi of 6a inches. be seeded into a clean, firm sorghum stubble, or it can b( TypicallyThe the 6 inches i loamy this Vona soil is grayish drilled into a firm prepared seedbed. Seeding early is brown. The upper sandy loam. is sand and the lowelig 5 spring has proven most successful. inches fine n an The subsoil is b4o inches and hght Windbreaks and environmental plantings are fairly we yellowish brown fine sandy loam about 14 thick. suited to this soiL Blowing sand and low available wate The substratum to a depth of 60 inches is sandy loam. capacity are the principal hazards in establishing tree Permeability is moderately rapid. Available water and shrubs. The soil is so loose that trees should b capacity is moderate. The effective rooting depth is, 60 planted in shallow furrows and vegetation maintaine inches or more. Surface runoff is slow, and the erosion between the rows. Supplemental irrigation may be neede hazard is low. to insure survival. Trees that are best suited and hay This soil is suited to limited cropping. Intensive good survival are Rocky Mountain juniper, wester cropping is hazardous because of soil blowing. The redcedar, ponderosa pine, and Siberian elm. The shrut cropping system should be limited to such close grown best suited are skunkbush sumac, lilac, and Siberia crops as alfalfa, wheat, and barley. The soil is also suited peashrub. to irrigated pasture. A suitable cropping system is 3 to 4 Wildlife is an important secondary use of this soil. Th years of alfalfa followed by 2 years of corn and small cropland areas provide favorable habitat for ring-necke grail. and alfalfa seeded with a nurse crop. pheasant and mourning dove. Many nongame species ca Closely spaced contour ditches or sprinklers can be be attracted by establishing areas for nesting and escar used in irrigating close grown crops. Contour furrows or cover. For pheasants, undisturbed nesting cover is easel spinklers should be used for new crops. Application of tial and should be included in plans for habitat develo; barnyard manure and commercial fertilizer helps to main ment, especially in areas of intensive agriculture. Rang thin good production. land wildlife, for example, the pronghorn antelope, can I The potential native vegetation on this range site is attracted by developing livestock watering facilitic dominated by sand bluestem, sand reedgrass, and blue managing livestock grazing, and reseeding where needed grama. Needleandthread, switchgrass, sideoats grama, This soil has goodnce established,or urban an and shrubs,recreation and western wheatgrass are also prominent. Potential development. production ranges from 2,200 pounds per acre in favora- trees grow well. The primary limiting soil feature is tl ble years to 1,800 pounds in unfavorable years. As range rapid permeability in the substratum, which causes condition deteriorates, the sand bluestem, sand reedgrass, hazard of ground water contamination from sewn: and switchgrass decrease and blue grama, sand dropseed, lagoons. In places recreational development is limited I and sand sage increase. Annual weeds and grasses invade the susceptibility to soil blowing. Capability subclass I` the site as range condition becomes poorer. irrigated, VIe nonirrigated; Sandy Plains range site. 920572 ..„ \I DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES xr:, ��-m PHONE(303)3564000,EXT.4400 915 10th STREET .� { * GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 ,;. 1) il I.., UNDER'S' Ii RIfrI.: 't igr x ;%'.# WELD COUNTY SHERIFF IFS' ' S CIF If_I. COLORADO L.I I" E:.I....L' i , C[I 806. .I. Marcn 11, 19;2 CASE NUMBER: Amended USR #537-3 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is a revised application from James M. McDonald for a Site Specific Development Plan and an Amended Special Review permit for an open air museum, airport, jump facility and associated uses in the A (Agricultural) zone district. The parcel of land is described as part of the E2 W2 SW4 of Section 25, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is adjacent to the Town of Frederick, east of Weld County Road 11 and north of an adjacent to Weld County Road 16. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by March 24, 1992, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Keith A. Schuett, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2 . We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: 3. We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: U,, ( �.I.L7 �,II ,V 5 . T : Z r to the enclosed letter.Signed: Agency: C p�� Date: (j3 hGI L >,iv r✓i'`tLr7:.uILHg r.•l raw ? vy- i r 'f1L-;Iii EA c\VA MAR . 1992 "�- I udi de-al (.4w4e("Al /44 tee, _.€:.., 19,aa /f? 4 /Ysn a 4 ! 9 9 / 1 en le „fn. . -7 tit,- ,ems - ...,d4n, / i ..s 4j .ill , -- -4✓4- . .a4..Ca4 J. r.H.. -ate.. a4 ,j._ aga O-o on .4.01,..2(444.4-4 12.. aj#42,,,aj -- _ et-A 0 1...e.,et 2 e.c , af.c. vi4,%;446- ,ffnit......,, re r. il.-ran --_ . a. a � _ :M, skr 4,24,,,,,_ _741_ , , ica.A.cdajr -.2-ce-eflinv "I ?atcelLq ok / —ef;:i• ae4a tiv _ oSea JA-t1 ...p _. ,. -. . c r in ..04 ^^a-...n Date: April 7, 1992 CASE NUMBER: Amended USR-537-3 NAME: James McDonald ADDRESS: 5129 Weld County Road 16 Longmont, CO 80501 REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and an Amended Special Review permit for an airport, open-air museum, balloon bungee jump facility and associated uses in the A (Agricultural) zone district. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the E2 W2 SW4 of Section 25, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: Adjacent to the Town of Frederick; east of Weld County Road 11, and north of and adjacent to Weld County Road 16. THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES' STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THIS REQUEST BE APPROVED FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: 1. The submitted materials are in compliance with the application requirements of Section 24.7 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 2. It is the opinion of the Department of Planning Services' staff that the applicant has shown compliance with Section 24.3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: The proposed Special Review permit area is located within the Urban Growth Boundary area of the Towns of Frederick, Firestone; and the City of Dacono. The Tri-Area Planning Commission has reviewed this proposal and recommends approval of this application with conditions. The concerns expressed by the Tri-Area Planning Commission are addressed in the attached Conditions of Approval and Development Standards. The proposed use is consistent with the intent of the A (Agricultural) zone district and is provided for as a Use by Special Review, provided the Conditions of approval and Development Standards are complied with. The uses permitted will be compatible with existing surrounding land uses which include: dryland pasture, oil and gas productions facilities, and rural residences. It is the opinion of the Department of Planning Services' staff that the Conditions of Approval and Development Standards will make this use compatible with the future land uses. No overlay districts affect the site. RECOMMENDATION, Amended USR-537-3 James McDonald Page 2 The Special Review Permit Conditions of Approval and Development Standards will provide adequate protection of the health, safety, and welfare of the neighborhood and County. This recommendation is based, in part, upon a review of the application materials submitted by the applicant, other relevant information regarding the request, and responses from referral entities. The Department of Planning Services' staff recommendation for approval is conditional upon the following: 1. The attached Development Standards for the Special Review permit shall be adopted and placed on the Special Review plat prior to recording the plat. The plat shall be delivered to the Department of Planning Services and be ready for recording in the Weld County Clerk and Recorder's office within 15 days of approval by the Board of County Commissioners. 2. The Special Review activity shall not occur nor shall any building or electrical permits be issued on the property until the Special Review plat is ready to be recorded in the office of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. 3. Prior to scheduling the case before the Board of County Commissioners, the application materials and plat, shall be amended to show the following: A. display pedestals located within properly screened open display areas only. B. the museum and all associated uses shall not exceed 10 acres in size. The 10 acre museum area shall be clearly identified on the plat. C. all areas for open display, display pedestals, museum historic buildings, and museum display and storage areas shall be visually screened from all adjacent properties and road rights-of-way at all times. Visual screening shall be provided by a minimum of a 6 foot solid board fence. The fence may be located no more than 8 inches above ground level. Corrugated metal and/or plywood are not acceptable materials for construction of visual screening. This does not include one area containing 9,416 square feet, fenced by the existing chain link fence. D. all structures, fences, and display areas shall be a minimum of 125' from the centerline of existing or proposed runways. t`.f.'t-y-N. to. RECOMMENDATION, Amended USA-537-3 James McDonald Page 3 E. the location and features of the storm water management plan approved by the Weld County Engineer. F. the location of all fuel facilities. 4. Prior to recording the plat: A. Evidence shall be submitted to the Department of Planning Services that an agreement has been made, in writing; between the Mountain View Fire Protection District and the applicants, to mitigate all concerns expressed in Charles E. Boyes' March 19, 1992 letter. B. An on-site improvements agreement according to policy regarding collateral for improvements shall be approved by the Board of County Commissioners for visual screening of existing museum and airport materials on-site. The applicant shall complete this form to show the improvements that the applicant is required to construct and the type of collateral which will guarantee installation of the solid board fence for visual screening of all existing museum and airport materials on site. 5. The applicant/property owner or operator of the facility shall enter into a road maintenance agreement with the Weld County Board of County Commissioners when the average daily traffic count meets or exceeds 100. 6. All existing open storage and display areas shall be visually screened from adjacent properties and road rights-of-way within 3 months of the date of approval by the Board of County Commissioners for this Special Review permit. 7. Prior to allowing public use of this Special Review permit area, evidence shall be provided to the Department of Planning Services that the Weld County Health Department has approved the installation of adequate sanitary facilities and water supply. 8. A storm water management plan shall be submitted to the Weld County Engineering Department for review and approval. 9. This Special Review permit shall be void if conditions of approval are not complied with and if the plat is not recorded within 90 days of the date of approval by the Board of County Commissioners. An extension of this time frame shall only be granted by Board of County Commissioners resolution. SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS James McDonald Amended USR-537-3 1. The Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review permit is for an airport, 10 acre open-air museum, balloon bungee jumping facility and associated uses in the A (Agricultural) zone district as submitted in the application materials on file in the Department of Planning Services and subject to the Development Standards stated hereon. 2. Approval of this plan may create a vested property right pursuant to Section 90 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 3. The Special Review permit shall not be transferable to any successors in interest to the described property and shall terminate automatically upon sale, transfer or conveyance of the property to others for the operation of the facility. 4. The storm water management plan, approved by the Weld County Engineering Department, shall be maintained at all times on this Special Review permit site. 5. The property shall be maintained in compliance at all times with the Mountain View Fire Protection District requirements. 6. All areas to be used for museum materials storage and display, display pedestals, museum historic buildings and structures, junk aircraft, aircraft salvage parts, airport maintenance equipment and derelict vehicles shall be visually screened, with approved solid board fence, from all adjacent properties and road rights-of-way. The only exception is one area, 9,416 square feet in size, specifically shown on the plat. 7. The 9,416 square feet unscreened open display area shall be maintained in a neat and orderly condition. Should this area not be maintained in a neat and orderly condition visual screening shall be installed. 8. The storm water management plan approved by the Weld County Engineering Department shall be maintained at all times. 9. Fences constructed for visual screening shall be a minimum of a 6 foot solid board slat fence placed no more than 8" from ground level and the materials and completed fence shall be uniform in size, color, and shape. The maximum spacing shall be 1/4 inch between boards that are 4 inches or less in width and 3/8 inch for boards that are over 4 inches in width. The fence shall be maintained at all times in good repair. 10. All materials stored within the visually screened area shall be placed a minimum of 2 feet from the fence or building providing visual screening. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, Amended USR-537-3 James McDonald Page 2 11. All commercial operators, property owner, and/or operator shall maintain individually a minimum liability insurance of $1 million per person and $3 million per occurrence. The insurance company shall be notified in writing that Weld County Department of Planning Services shall be notified in case of insurance lapse. The Department of Planning Services shall be notified by the insurance companies of current coverage of operations located on site. 12. For operator safety the Special Review permit area shall be used by one operation at a time. Jump operations (including parachutes and bungee cord) shall not be operated while the airport is being used by fixed wing aircraft, rotary wing aircraft, or hot air balloons. 13. Structures shall not exceed 25 feet in height while the airport is being used by fixed wing aircraft, rotary wing aircraft, or hot air balloons. 14. All buildings, structures, fences, and display materials and areas shall be located a minimum of 125 feet from the centerline of existing or future runways. 15. Gates or openings within the screening fence for access, shall be kept closed when not in use or designed and constructed to maintain visual screening from all adjacent properties and road rights-of-way. 16. No organized sale of items associated with the museum or airport operation shall be conducted on the Special Review site. 17. All waste materials shall be handled, stored, and disposed of in a manner that controls fugitive dust, blowing debris and other potential nuisance conditions. 18. The maximum permissible noise level shall not exceed the industrial limits of 80 dB(A) as measured, according to 25-12-102, Colorado Revised Statutes. 19. Fugitive dust shall be controlled on this site. 20. The property shall be maintained in compliance with S.A.R.A. , Title III, requirements. 21. The Use by Special Review permit areas shall be maintained in such a manner so as to prevent soil erosion, fugitive dust, and the growth of noxious weeds. r 2"^ I-w„ DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, Amended USR-537-3 James McDonald Page 3 22. Separate toilets shall be installed for each sex at the rate of two for the first one hundred persons and one for each additional one hundred persons, or fraction thereof. Portable toilet facilities are not approved sanitary facilities and shall not be located on the Special Review permit site. 23. Two accesses for the airport from Weld County Road 16 to the site shall be maintained. The accesses shall be clearly labeled on the property and shall be unlocked during public use of the property. 24. Maintenance and repair shall be permitted only between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and sunset but no later than 8:00 p.m. , for uses which create light, noise and/or vibration noticeable at, or beyond, the property line. 25. Hours of operation for the airport shall be from dawn to sunset, but no later than 8:00 p.m. Hours of operation for bungee jumping or other associated uses of the property shall be from 7:00 a.m. to sunset, but no later than 8:00 p.m. , Monday through Friday, and 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. , on Saturday and Sunday. 26. All trash shall be stored inside a building or in an enclosed container to prevent blowing of refuse onto surrounding properties. Trash and refuse shall be removed from the property monthly. 27. A four strand barbed wire fence shall be constructed along the entire west side of the property with three private access points for use by the following adjacent properties: 7462 Weld County Road 11; 5053 Weld County Road 16; and 5059 Weld County Road 16. The accesses may be used for ingress and egress for aircraft and vehicles. The property owner(s) and/or operator(s) of the airstrip shall be responsible for maintaining the fence and keeping it in good repair and free from debris. 28. A sign (3 feet x 4 feet) shall be posted at each entrance to the property containing the limitations as to use, including hours of operation, and number of airworthy aircraft permitted. 29. A paved parking area of sufficient size to park one hundred vehicles shall be located on the property. The parking areas may be allocated for the use of the operators of the planes in storage in the hangars. The parking areas shall conform to the requirements of Section 41.1.3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. No parking shall be allowed on Weld County Road 16. All traffic shall be controlled within the Special Review permit site. 30. The buildings, gas pumps, and fuel storage shall conform with the Mountain View Fire Protection District requirements. . '9 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, Amended USR-537-3 James McDonald Page 4 31. A storage tank of sufficient size to hold 3,500 gallons of water shall be maintained on the property for fire protection of the property. The storage tank shall have the approval of the Mountain View Fire Protection District. 32. The owner/operator shall maintain a ditch for traffic control on the south side of the property. 33. Aircraft designed to be used for the museum shall be displayed in the designated areas on the plat. 34. The property owner and/or operator of this operation shall be responsible for complying with all of the above stated Standards. Noncompliance with any of the above stated Standards may be reason for revocation of the permit by the Board of County Commissioners. 35. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Design Standards of Section 24.5 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 36. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Operation Standards of Section 24.6 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 37. Representatives or members of the Weld County Health Department, Mountain View Fire Protection District, and Weld County Department of Planning Services shall be granted access onto the site at any reasonable time in order to insure the operations carried out on the site comply with the Operation Standards stated hereon and all applicable Weld County Regulations. 38. The Special Review area shall be limited to the plans shown hereon and governed by the foregoing Standards and all applicable Weld County Regulations. Major changes from the plans or Development Standards as shown or stated shall require the approval of an amendment of the Permit by the Weld County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners before such changes from the plans or Development Standards are permitted. Any other changes shall be filed in the office of the Department of Planning Services. . ADDITIONAL COMMENTS James McDonald Amended USR-537-3 Edward J. Tagliente, Mayor for the Town of Frederick, in his March 23rd letter recommended that this application be denied. Letters and phone calls have been received from surrounding property owners regarding this case. •9 REFERRAL LIST NAME: James M. McDonald CASE NUMBER: Amended USR-537-3 REFERRALS SENT: March 11, 1992 REFERRALS TO BE RECEIVED BY: March 24, 1992 COUNTY TOWNS and CITIES /�- Attorney _Ault ✓X Health Department _Brighton Extension Service _Broomfield -Emergency Management Office ____Dacono X Sheriff's Office _Eaton (:-X Engineering _Erie Housing Authority _Evans X Airport Authority _Firestone X Building Inspection Fort Lupton ' X Frederick STATE Garden City _Division of Water Resources _Gilcrest Geological Survey Greeley _ _Department of Health _Grover to y Highway Department Hudson _Historical Society _Johnstown Water Conservation Board ____Keenesburg Oil and Gas Conservation Commission _Kersey La Salle FIRE DISTRICTS _Lochbuie Ault F-1 _Longmont _ _Berthoud F-2 _Mead _Brighton F-3 _Milliken _Eaton F-4 New Raymer _Fort Lupton F-5 Northglenn Galeton F-6 _Nunn _Hudson F-7 _Platteville _Johnstown F-8 _Severance La Salle F-9 _Thornton VX Mountain View F-10 Windsor Milliken F-11 _ Nunn F-12 COUNTIES _ _Pawnee F-22 _Adams _Platteville F-13 _Boulder _Platte Valley F-14 _Larimer Poudre Valley F-15 Raymer F-23 FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES Southeast Weld F-16 _US Army Corps of Engineers Windsor/Severance _ F-17 USDA-APHIS Veterinary Service Wiggins F-18 jr'X Federal Aviation Administration Western Hills F-20 _Federal Communication Commission OTHER SOIL CONSERVATION DISTRICTS _Central Colo. Water Conservancy Dist. _Brighton Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. _Fort Collins l%X Tri-Area Planning Commission � Greeley /."-„.., Longmont West Adams COMMISSION/BOARD MEMBER X Shirley Camenisch 920572 pl FRFO �% ��• TOWN OF FREDERICK N P. O. BOX 435 • FREDERICK, CO 80530 • (303) 833-2388 • METRO: (303)659-8729 xoo '`� t '�'� 4 March 23, 1992 Department of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Attn: Mr. Keith A. Schuett Reference: James M. McDonald Case Number: Amended USR #537-3 Mr. Schuett: After reviewing the materials you sent on Mr. McDonald proposed airport and museum and after taking a tour of the proposed facilities, we urge that Mr. McDonalds request for a special review use be denied at this time for the following reasons: 1. A review of the history of this proposal shows that Mr. McDonald has not met the requirements of the original special review permit. This latest request only seems to be a thinly veiled attempt to make legal all the infractions of his present permit. 2 . Although Mr. McDonald may be sincere in his desire to create a museum, we think that he does not have the wherewithal to accomplish the task. Museums display items in a narrow well defined context that will give the viewer a sense of their historical meaning or value. Mr. McDonald' s collection of airplanes in various states of disrepair, no more imparts any knowledge of the development of aviation, than what an auto junk yard tells us about the development of the automobile. 3. Mr. McDonald continues to acquire more and more pieces of airplanes, autos, etc. If he lived for a hundred years, he would never be able to restore what he presently has on the site. So why should he be allowed to continue in his present activities? He is not creating an airplane museum, but an airplane salvage yard. 4 . Mr. McDonald has several storage buildings on the site which do not meet any building or fire codes that we are aware of. 5 . Mr. McDonald' s request to allow ballooning and bungee jumping from his airport are activities that are increasingly becoming an annoyance to the surrounding property owners. I know you have heard their complaints. Unless the County can enforce stricter 920572 Page 2 regulations to insure that this operation is made more compatible with surrounding homeowners, this activity should not be allowed. 6. The Town of Frederick has annexed areas on all sides of the airport. The present Comprehensive Plan of the Town designates these areas as low density residential. The Town is presently working with land owners to develop the land west of County Road 11 into a residential area with an 18 hole golf course. We are very concerned that the County is still allowing uses that might be appropriate in a rural area but will not be compatible as the area becomes more urbanized. Very truly yours, C '/ f� �CA Edward J. Tagliente, Mayor Town of Frederick EJT/jb encs 9 272 MOUNTAIN VIEW FIRE PRO 1 ECTION DISTRICT Administrative Office: f,,i,r;'� 700 Weaver Park Road• Longmont, CO 80501 �� (303) 772-0710 Metro (303) 666-4404 March 19, 1992 Mr. Keith A. Schuett, Current Planner Department of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Mr. Schuett: RE: Amended USR #537-3 Airport and Museum 5129 WCR 16 I have reviewed the submitted materials and drawings for compliance with the Uniform Fire Code and the Fire Protection Development Standards, as adopted by the Fire District. Below are listed the items that are needed to comply with these standards: 1. The minimum required fire flow for a commercial development is 2500 gallons per minute at 20 psi residual pressure. This may be provided by connection to a water system of a municipality or water district or by on site storage. The water supply, whether provided by a water system or on site storage, must be able to maintain this fire flow for 120 minutes. If on site storage is selected as the method of providing the required fire flow, fire pumps to provide the required flow and pressure must comply with National Fire Protection Association (N.F.P.A. ) Standard 20, Standard for the Installation of Centrifugal Fire Pumps . (Fire Protection Development Standards Section 5 .02-3) 2 . Based on the required fire flow, a minimum of three fire hydrants are required to be installed on the site. These are to be served by the water system described in Item 1 above. The average spacing between hydrants is 450 feet. Hydrant and underground piping installed shall comply with N.F.P.A. Standard 24 Standard for the Installation of Private Fire Service Mains and Their Appurtenances. (Fire Protection Development Standards Section 6.04-1) 3 . Fuel tanks, piping and dispensing units installed on the site must comply with all requirements of the Uniform Fire Code Article 79 . Contact the Fire District Station 1 Station 2 Station 3 Station 4 Station 5 Station 6 Station 7 9119 Cnty Line Rd. 10971 WCR 13 P.O.Box 575 P.O.Box 11 10911 Dobbin Run P.O.Box 666 P.O.Box 40 Longmont,CO Longmont,CO 299 Palmer Ave. 8500 Niwot Road Lafayette,CO 600 Briggs 100 So.Forest St. 80501 80501 Me38x%ldeaniCk Ain6}Doaatnand MuseuMoo26 Erie,CO 80516 Dacono,CO 80514 1 of 2 920572 for specific requirements and details. A permit from the Fire District is required for installation or alteration of fuel tanks, piping or dispensing units. 4 . Hangars, museum display buildings and workshops constructed in the future must comply with all requirements for required fire flow, access and hydrants. When planning the water system for this site it is important to anticipate future construction. Required fire flow, number of hydrants and hydrant location is dependent on the type of construction and square footage of construction. The 2500 gallon per minute fire flow outlined above is the minimum fire flow for a commercial site. For example, a 20, 000 square foot building could require a fire flow of 3,750 gallons per minute for certain construction types. It is important to coordinate plans for future construction with the Fire District to avoid conflicts with Codes. 5 . If the workshops are to include spray painting operations for aircraft or vehicles, those spray painting rooms, areas or booths shall comply with Article 45 of the Uniform Fire Code. 6 . The Fire District has adopted a plans check and inspection fee. For future reviews of construction plans on this site, the Fire District should be contacted for the amount of the fee. The Fire District has recently examined the water supply situation to the airport. The Fire District will allow one additional building, in addition to those already on the airport site as of this date, to be constructed or moved onto the site using the present 3500 gallon tank for fire protection water. If any building is built or moved onto the site after that, then water for fire protection must be provided as described in Paragraph 1 above. The Central Weld Water District has a 6 inch pipeline about 3500 feet north of the intersection of WCR 11 and WCR 16 on WCR 11 . Plans should be made to extend that water line onto the site and provide hydrants as shown above. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Charles E. Boyes Fire Prevention Specialist CC: Jerry Ward, Chief of District Mark Lawley, Division Chief, Fire Prevention Frederick Airport and Museum 920a5572 2of2 9 2 Atria,;--‘ mEmoRAnDum ° qi � , ,VIIT c MAR 2 a 1992 I_ To Keith Schuett, Planning Date March county Planning COLORADO From Drew Scheltinga, County Engineer subject. James McDonald, USR-537-3 When the applicant first applied for an amended USR in October of 1991, he proposed major additions to the property. Although a few buildings have been left off of the most recent application, the applicant is still proposing a substantial expansion. Originally, he proposed up to 1,000 museum patrons per day, and now proposes the maximum number of users would remain at 200. The most recent traffic counts indicate approximately 200 vehicles per day on Road 11, and 100 vehicles per day on Road 16. The applicant indicates the vehicle traffic count would remain at 100. I recommend a road maintenance and improvements agreement be required if there are more than 100 vehicles per day generated by the site. This application still proposes the addition of several buildings. Storm water discharge will definitely increase from the site. The applicant should be required to provide a storm water plan that addresses how runoff is handled on- site, detention facilities, and effects to downstream properties. DS/mw:prmc.mrw cc: Commissioner Webster Planning Referral File - James McDonald, USR-537-3 920572 lose! mEMORAnaum WIWeldh Schuett To Weld County Planning Date March 26, 1992 COLORADO From John Pickle, Director, Environmental Protection Servicce' Subject: Case Number: USR 537-3 McDonald, James M. This memo is an addendum to our proposal review of the above-mentioned case, with specific regard to Item a 15, "All pesticides, fertilizer and other potentially hazardous chemicals must be stored and handled in a safe manner." The United States Department of Agriculture has just recently developed new rules and regulations governing storage, mixing and loading of pesticides and fertilizers. This is in accordance with 25-8-205.5 of the Colorado Water Quality Control Act. We feel that their rules and regulations should apply in this and future similar cases. JP/lf-e546 MAR 2 6 1992 Weld County Planning 920572 r , TRI-AREA PLANNING COMMISSION P.O. BOX 363 FREDERICK, COLORADO 80530 March 23, 1992 Mr. Keith A. Schuett RE: Amended USR #537-3 Current Planner Department of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Keith, The above captioned application was reviewed by Tri-Area Planning Commission on March 12th at a work session. We heard public comments in November 1991 and March 1992 , walked through the property on March 7th, and have been individually contacted . Since our response is required by March 24th for the April 7th meeting of Weld County Planning, and our meeting is in jeopardy because of the municipal elections , we determined there was sufficient information to respond. Of those expressing a negative opinion on the airstrip operation, the majority recognized the inherent value of its development . Their objections focused on; the quantity and quality of visible, outside storage of relics ; the appearance of existing, and lack of sufficient , screening; and, the disruption (nuisance) resulting from public activities (parachuting, bungee jumping, etc. ) . Section 2 .a . of the application narrative refers to a 50% division between airstrip and museum acreage. Precise language is missing as to museum acreage, thus conjuring up visions of any and all types of described mechanical contrivances sprawling over 20 acres . It is reasonable to assume, when restoration catches up to acquisition, the units would be stored or displayed in buildings because of weather related deterioration, a common problem in Colorado. Considering the potentials, we recommend that outside, uncovered storage of the described units , be limited to 10 acres . The remaining 30 acres can be devoted to airstrip, residential (owner and caretaker) , and buildings ( including hangers , workshops , displays, etc. ) . Fences have acquired expanded uses beyond exclusion and/or con- tainment. "Ladybird" fences are now used for screening, only secondarily for other purposes as referred to in the narrative. Existing fencing is ineffective and unsightly. Required screening at other locations (example : Columbine Metals ) , although not entirely effective, are an improvement. Also, from the WRC #11 (West ) side, an appropriate application would run from the He$son north property line to the Grisham north property line. 920372 9205172 �1 U.S. Department of Transportation DENVER AIRPORTS DISTRICT OFFICE 5440 Roslyn Street Federal Aviation Suite 300 Administration Denver, Colorado 80216-6026 (303) 286-5527 MAR 2 0 1992 Mr. Keith A. Schuett Department of Planning Services Weld County 915 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Dear Mr. Schuett: Re: Case Number USR #537-3 revised application - Frederick-Firestone Airport This is in response to your request for comments regarding the revised application for the above mentioned proposal. An airspace analysis of the activities was completed by Regional Office of Air Traffic and if the locations and elevations of the jumping operations at the airport remain the same, no additional information is needed. In the interest of safety, we would recommend that the proposed buildings be kept at a minimum of 125 feet from the runway centerline. Please contact me at the above number if you have any questions. Sincerely, a,(Lic� Laura Littrell Airport Planner 3/44 isv 920372 • 0 Ik DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE(303)356-3000. EXT.440C 9151Cth STREET m; "< GREELEY,Ca4OF.A CO 80631 COLORADO • <: March 11, 1992 CASE NUMBER: Amended USR ,#537-3 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is a revised application from James M. McDonald for a Site Specific Development Plan and an Amended Special Review permit for an open air museum, airport, jump facility and associated uses in the A (Agricultural) zone district. The parcel of land is described as part of the E2 W2 SW4 of Section 25, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is adjacent to the Town of Frederick, east of Weld County Road 11 and north of an adjacent to Weld County Road 16. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by March 24, 1992, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Keith A. Schuett, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: 3. X We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Signed: i�a, 2, Ti_p_Insajzt /,i Agency: Longmont Soil Conservation District Date: March 19 1992 lei 9205'72 STATE OF COLORADO DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS P.O. Box 850 Sgt+e"`°F Greeley, Colorado 80632-0850 (303) 353-1232 �o°" �:Jeo✓�P Weld Co. , Off System yAi ? :t,;,2. McDonald Air Museum N.E. Corner Co. Rd. 11 and Co. Rd. 16 March 19, 1992 Mr. Keith Schuett, Planner Department of Planning Weld County 915 Tenth Street Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Mr. Schuett: We have reviewed the application from James McDonald for a Site Specific Development Plan and Amended Special Review permit, and we have no comment on the proposal . Thank you for the opportunity to review the proposal . Please contact me at 350-2163 if you have any questions. Very truly yours, Evan . Hoope r. Development/Access Coordinator EAH/cm cc: L. D. Yost G. E. Sisson File 920572;G fit DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE(303)356-4000. EXT.4400 J �L5\ `jLJ, .`:1Ct1 ?EET , ^ ® RECEIVED CI C "alitr ` / A_ (11 C63 • lop 1 1 �h MAR 2 1992 COLORADO 3 992 Weld County Planning March ii, 1992 rOL�,�I�&GASCONS.C� MUMBER: :17,71.dd US? TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is a revised application from James M. McDonald for a Site Specific Development Plan and an Amended Special Review permit for an open air museum, airport, jump facility and associated uses in the A (Agricultural) zone district. The parcel of land is described as part of the E2 W2 SW4 of Section 25 , T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is adjacent to the Town of Frederick, east of Weld County Road 11 and north of an adjacent to Weld County Road 16. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by March 24, 1992, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Keith A. Schuett, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above . 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2 . We do nct have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: 3.X \ We have / / reviewed� the request and find no conflicts with our C'interests. otonin° Oal- / 4 IRAs Cafl1M)Wonl 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Please efer to the 1 enclosed letter. � '� Signedy/ ie"��2 J " Agency: COLD, On- k l)4s C./�' s. ( 044/1o. Date: 3.73-7_? 920572 1.7 (i(ti%' MAR 2 5 1992 1Nck!CCountyPiaaning DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES 1 ` PHONE(303)356-5000, EXT.4400 `j"4: A 91510th STREET 4: GREELEY.COLORADO 80 631'N , rhig ERRING OFFICE • i P� EMERGENCY (1�`i(1� I:.t 1�=.�`� � COLORADO f") q 063 1. March 11, 1992 CASE NUMBER: Amended USR #537-3 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is a revised application from James M. McDonald for a Site Specific Development Plan and an Amended Special Review permit for an open air museum, airport, jump facility and associated uses in the A (Agricultural) zone district. The parcel of land is described as part of the E2 W2 SW4 of Section 25, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is adjacent to the Town of Frederick, east of Weld County Road 11 and north of an adjacent to Weld County Road 16. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by March 24, 1992, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Keith A. Schuett, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: 3. IG We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our /interests. Pc 45,'9,(8 / ,.9 ern Sy ,-ec/ /,e/S et24,,_ SYvrc"e SrCar7s. ✓✓ 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Signed: 7 . Agency: GUS' Date: 0-7.2- 92- 920572 REFERRAL LIST NAME: James M. McDonald CASE NUMBER: Amended USR #537-3 REFERRALS SENT: October 30, 1991 REFERRALS TO BE RECEIVED BY: November 14, 1991 COUNTY TOWNS and CITIES Attorney _Ault ',X Health Department Brighton Extension Service Broomfield [✓.X Emergency Management Office Dacono Sheriff's Office Eaton t/ X Engineering _Erie Housing Authority _Evans F=-Airport Authority _Firestone X Building Inspection _Fort Lupton X Frederick STATE Garden City _Division of Water Resources Gilcrest Geological Survey _Greeley _Department of Health _Grover Highway Department Hudson _Historical Society _Johnstown _Water Conservation Board _Keenesburg X Oil and Gas Conservation Commission _Kersey La Salle FIRE DISTRICTS Lochbuie Ault F-1 Longmont Berthoud F-2 _Mead _Brighton F-3 Milliken _Eaton F-4 _New Raymer _Fort Lupton F-5 _Northglenn Galeton F-6 _Nunn _Hudson F-7 _Platteville Johnstown F-8 _Severance V÷/ La Salle F-9 Thornton Longmont Windsor _Mountain View F-10 Milliken F-11 Nunn F-12 COUNTIES Pawnee F-22 _Adams _Platteville F-13 _Boulder Platte Valley F-14 Larimer Poudre Valley F-15 Raymer F-23 FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES Southeast Weld F-16 US Army Corps of Engineers Windsor/Severance F-17 USDA-APHIS Veterinary Service Wiggins F-18 Y X Federal Aviation Administration _Western Hills F-20 Federal Communication Commission OTHER SOIL CONSERVATION DISTRICTS Central Colo. Water Conservancy Dist. _Brighton Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. _Fort Collins P/X Tri-Area Planning Commission - Greeley V X Longmont _West Adams COMMISSION/BOARD MEMBER k/X Shirley Camenisch 920572 November 10, 1991 Mr. Keith Schuett Current Planner Department of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 RE: Amended USR - #537-3 Dear Mr. Schuett : The Tri-Area Planning Commission considered the above captioned application on November 5, 1991 , a review of the application and evaluation of the objections from adjaclent property owners compelled the Commission to unanimously recommend denial of the application for amendment . The following considerationsled to the recommendation: 1 . Safety concerns resulting from increased air traffic and potentially larger aircraft if uses are expanded; 2 . Continued and increased incidences of tr5spassing from uncontrolled or uncontrollable activities ; 3 . History of zoning violations to the extent that annexation discussions were terminated ; no indications were given that the approval of this application would improve the relationships within the neighborhood or any other complainants; 4. The present airport is bounded by roads 11 , 16 3/4 and 18 . Adjacent to the existing facility are single family residences and small to medium agricultural operations (crops, hay, livestock, etc . ) 5 . Referencing the application, page 2 , item 2e - " . . .users could be up to 1 ,000 per day. . . , " item 2f - " . . .employees . . .could grow to 100 . . .hours of operation from daylight to sunset, " item 2i - " . . . traffic. . .could consist of 500 vehicles per day. " The foregoing projections compels concern for substantial traffic increases and the resulting safety and pollution effects . Roads 11 and 16 are gravel roads and minimally maintained. 6 . Items 2g and j appear to be deficient considering the applicants desired increase in activity. Considering the applicants intentions , we feel the desired activities are not compatible with agriculturally zoned areas, exceed the ancillary purpose originally intended , and disregard the health and safety of adjacent residents . 920572 P- r N0V 2 ' 1991 Keith Schuett U Weld County Dept of Held C;cznri PIr ung Planning Services 915 10th St. Greeley, Co. 80631 Dear Keith, In response to the Tri-Area Planning Commissions letter to you dated 11 1U-91. 1. We stated in our application that this was moving toward 80% museum and 20% airport which would decrease notincrease air traffic and nothing has ever been mentioned about larger aircraft, our only expansion is for museum display. In fact if you look at the map it shows going from two runways to one in the future. 2. Ballooning activities which used to operate here have moved to the east of Firestone. Property is now secure on all four sides with fences and lockable gates and we anticipate no future problems. 3. We never applied for annexation and after discussing it with several local people we decided against it at this time since Ed T'agi..iente, the mayor of Firestone indicated that they only needed one more property and then our annexation would be automatic anyway. 4. Requires no response. 5. Since our last amenduent to the USR the price has increased aPpx. 900% so we have tried to incorporate all our needs for the next twenty to thirty years in this application. We do not plan this increase in activicy to begin tomorrow or next week or next year but over the next two to three decades our hope is to have a museum fashioned after the Pioneer Museum in Minden, Nebraska and would bring in additional. revenue to the iri-Area. How could the Weld County and Tr-Area Commissioners be against any activity that would create jobs and revenue and attract tourist? 6. Within the next 20 to 30 years as we expand we hope to have city water and sewage. In the meantime how is Colorado National Speedway (two miles south of us) addressing this problem? Also in answer to question #5 above The Colorado National Speedway is on a minimally maintained road with thousands of customers in one day and it has not caused any problems. As far as our desired activities not being compatible with agriculturally zoned areas. the whole town of Minden, Nebraska is real agriculture and the Pioneer Museum is the only attraction which brings tourist and revenue from all over the world and causes no disregard to the health and crafty of residents as ours will. not. We have operated here for twenty three years and no residents have been harmed and the majority of the town residents don't even know there is an airport here. 920572 r ARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES j I 4ThillRat d Chit L WPHONE(303)3564000,EXT.4400 I 915 10th STREET ti Jv 0 `, 1991 GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 C Weld Cu :tj Pinning COLORADO October 30, 1991 CASE NUMBER: Amended USR #537-3 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from James M. McDonald for a Site Specific Development Plan and an Amended Special Review permit for an open air museum, airport, jump facility, and associated uses in the A (Agricultural) zone district. The parcel of land is described as part of the E2 W2 SW4 of Section 25, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is adjacent to the Town of Frederick; east of Weld County Road 11, and north of and adjacent to Weld County Road 16. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by October 14, 1991, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Keith A. Schuett, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: 3. We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. le refer to the enclosed letter. '/�, Signed: ;„ Agency: STT ( F� Date: 1(07 t/ � +� 920572 Longmont Soil Conservation District 9595 Nelson Road, Box D-Longmont, CO 80501 -(303) 776-4034 November 4, 1991 Weld County Department of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Re: Case Number: Amended USR #537-3 Gentlemen: James M. McDonald This is in reply to the application from James M. McDonald for a Site Specific Development Plan and Amended Special Review Permit. In the application, it states under "Application 2. Item I. Livestock will not exceed the number allowed, and Item p. Erosion control is added by vegetative cover." It is recommended that a vegetative inventory be completed and plans developed to establish proper grazing amounts and erosion control during the process. Sincerely, <_%'� Louis Rademacher President LR:rah LT!! qrs,\\\ ,�,� p 1991 1 0,„st, Neid CONSERVATION - DEVELOPMENT - SELF-GOVERNMENT 920572 November 7, 1991 c`1 N0V 1 b• 1991 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Weld County Planning SUB: Two small sheds located on James McDonald property facing WCR 16. A Mr. Richard Rooney moved LONGMONT PARACHUTE CENTER from Longmont Municipal airport to the above location in the spring of 1973. In 1974, Mr Rooney acquired a second aircraft, a twin Beech 18, necessitating storage, warehouse and locker security. Each of these buildings were moved in intact and on skids. The larger was used promarily to store the seats (10) of the Beech when it was used for skydiving. The smaller bldg., was utilized for tools, spare parts and motor oil. Mr. Rooney abandoned these buildings and disposed of his interest at this air- port prior to 11-17-1975.* Respectfully, Leal * These dates are certified by Federal Aviation Authority Certified Flight Instructors as endorsed in my Pilot Flight Record and Log Book. rs 920572 March _3, 1992 Keith Schuett Weld County Planning Dept 11992 1 915 10th Street MAR 2 Room 342 Weld Cm:*Pinning Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Mr. Schuett, This letter is in response to the application submitted to expand the McDonald airstrip. After reading the application, hearing many of the concerns brought up by my neighbors, and weighing the past track record of the place, I am strongly opposed to the granting of this permit. I also feel that the current permit requirements need to be enforced. in the application Mr McDonald commits to nothing. The use of the words "including but not limited to" grants carte blanche. The airstrip would be limited to nothing. Whoever, whenever and used for whatever is my interpretation of the terms being used here. There are too many undefined, gray areas in this application that Mr McDonald could interpret to fit his changing needs thus keeping the county off his back. Included in this proposal is the provision for the bungee-jumpers to use this area again. I'm sure I don't need to remind you of the problems they created last summer with their constant noise starting at dawn, all night Parties, open campfires and tampering with the oil wells. There were a number of road hazards created by the excessive number of cars. And last, the law enforcement agencies failure to do anything about it. Last summer an article appeared from the associated press issued by the Boulder County Zoning Division which "classifies bungee-lumping as an outdoor, recreation, permitted only in non-residential, commercial business districts." by using this policy a lot of the problems that were experienced by residential and agriculture residents from this sport, were solved. Mr. McDonald's proposal includes spray planes and fuel tanks. This means chemicals. What kind of safety regulations is he going to force on the people using the property and how is he going to enforce them? He doesn't live on the site, he uses a Wheatridge address. What about the proposed gliders or any other type of craft using this strip, who is liable when they crash into our houses and kill or injure us or our live stock. He claims no responsibility for what happens on his land. There are no regulations requiring Mr McDonald or any body using his land to carry liability SZ Weld County Dept. Of Planning `r� �� - 915 10th Street MAR 2 / 1992 Greeley, Co. 80631 ATTN. Keith Schuett / Weld County Commisioners Weld County Planning Re: James McDonald ' s use permit SAFETY Mr. McDonald states that "All types of aircraft operate here, including but not limited to, air planes, hot air balloons , helicopters , spray planes , gliders and ultralites . " The truth of the matter is that I 've only observed airplanes , hot air balloons , gliders and ultralites operate at the airport. In order for them to operate successfully, and safely, they were forced to trespass on the 40 acre parcel adjoining Mr. McDonalds property to the east, which is owned by Ronald Gaulke. I have been granted power of attorney for Mr. Gaulke ' s property as he lives in Wisconsin. Mr. Gaulke came to Colorado last summer and erected a fence on his property at the property line of Mr. McDonald ' s land. Shortly after being installed, the fence was cut down. Oddly enough, the fence has been cut in the exact area where the bungee jumpers moved their operations when they were forced off of Mr. Gaulke ' s land when he regained control of it. The simple fact of the matter is , "Does Mr. McDonald have enough land to safely implement all proposed operations, with future expansion, when he could not accomodate the activities of the airport last summer?" LIABILITY At the Tri-Area Planning Commission meeting on 7Uesday March 3 , Mr. McDonald was posed with a question in regards to liability at the airport. I was appalled at his response when he claimed that due to the fact that the airport is privately owned that he does not have to assume liability for the activities being carried out at the airport. I may have misunderstood this statement, but nevertheless , I feel that Weld County should clarify the responsibility of liability to the surrounding neighbors of the airport. It is my personal opinion that Mr. McDonald should be liable for activities on his property, just as all land owners are liable for activities carried out on their property. Recently, Ed Herson, the operator of the parachute activities at the airport, was fined by Flight Standards for various violations . Mr. McDonald was more than likely aware of the violations of Ed Herson, but he continued to allow him to operate on his property anyway. Mr. McDonald claims, "We comply with Federal FAR flight regulations . . . " Does "WE" in the above statement refer to ALL users of the airport? If so, FAA, Flight Standards , and the NTSB, probably have documentation to the contrary. 920572 FIRE HAZARDS Mr. McDonald states that there are several fuel storage tanks on his property, as well as various other chemicals used with the spray planes for agricultural purposes . These large quantities of fuel and other chemicals pose a threat to surrounding citizens , as well as the McDonalds themselves . Not only is the potential for a fire of outstanding magnitude greatly possible, but the storage of these chemicals should also be addressed. Are these fuels and chemicals being stored according to EPA and HAZ-MAT regulations? Mr. McDonald proposes that a 3500 gal . water tank will be their one and only means of fire protection. In my opinion, a 3500 gal . water tank is completely and totally insufficient for the property as it presently exists . ? feel that due to the fact that he will be running an operation that serves the public, it should be his responsibility to have an inexhaustible supply of water to meet the high fire hazard. He should be required to run a water line and have at least two fire hydrants on the property. In closing, I would like to state that I am not opposed to an airport that is well run and clean. In fact, an airport that is well run and clean could quite possibly be an asset to the Tri-Area as well as the surrounding agricultural property. What I am opposed to is the non compliance that presently exists. I am extremely opposed to Mr. McDonalds interpretation of his special use by review permit, as he adopts its wording to his benefit, with a total disregard for his existing permit. Mr. McDonald continually operates out of compliance . It would be my inclination to revoke his current permit, as well as to deny any further expansion on this property. I strongly urge each and everyone of you to consider the wording which is used throughout Mr. McDonalds application, I quote "INCLUDED, BUT NOT LIMITED TO. . . " What a scary thought ! ! Respectfully, fte,:ace, Geraldine K. Russell 5511 WCR 16 Longmont , Co. 80504 920572 Department of Planning Services �ury y,�Sry5� Current Planner r'i� )yr ��\V11 915 lothSt . / 1992 Greeley , Co . 80631 MAR 2 C5 i Wok!C;adm1y Planning Dear Mr . Schuett , This letter is in reference to the amended Special Use Permit Application submitted by Mr . James McDonald . As a property owner in the area I wish to address some concerns with the application . My neighbors and I have been fighting the noise and traffic issues for quite some time . The amended application states that vehicular traffic will consist of passenger vehicles and traffic will depend on museum popularity , but could consist of 500 vehicles per day . Our roads were not designed to accomodate that many vehicles on a daily basis . Is Weld County going to pave the roads to allow for additional traffic and eliminate the constant blowing of dust? The application also states that the number of users could be up to 1 , 000 per day . We already have a problem with noise pollution from the activities of his current permit . Can you imagine the noise generated by 1 , 000 people that are jumping from balloons , planes and platforms or structures ! Add the noise from several airplanes , balloons and ultralights at 6 : 00 A . M. and the whole community will be able to discard their alarm clocks ! I fail to understand the compatibility within an agriculturally zoned area . I am not opposed to a well kept , well run personal airstrip however , keeping in mind the history of non-compliance and the nuisane factor , I urge the Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners to cautiously consider Mr . McDonalds application . I wish to extend my Thanks to all members of the Planning Commission and the Board of Count Commissioners for considering my concerns in this matter . Sin erel , L . Davies Department of Planning Services Current Planner (] !-v_14_) y\.S4�+ 915 10th S t . . / Greeley , Co . 80631 MAR 2 / 1992 Welt!Conti Planning Dear Mr . Schuett , As interested citizens and homeowners in Weld County , I am writing in regard to the Use by Special Review Application which has been submitted by Mr . James McDonald . As property owners adjacent to Mr . McDonald , we have several concerns that we would like to bring to the attention of the Board Members . Our number one concern is SAFETY ! ! ! We have two small children , ages seven and nine , who like to ride horses . Mr . McDonalds runway is adjacent ( to the south) of our horse pasture . The airplanes always land from the north going directly over the horse pasture and frightening the horses . The potential for one of my children being harmed while riding is very , very great ! Mr . McDonald has stated that he has provided parking for 100 vehicles . I have numerous photos showing cars lined up on both sides of Road 16. On several occasions , emergency vehicles have been called to the airport however , due to locked gates could not gain access . Fortunately , no one has ever been injured to the degree that they required emergency aid on site but in the event they should , how will the emergency team get to them? How will Weld County ever ensure that people participating in these activities will be properly cared for? Shouldn ' t someone have the health , safety and well being of residents and part- icipants in mind? As a parent I am afraid for my children ! ! Those fears include planes frightening the livestock , planes crashing in our pasture , potential fires . If I need emergency aid for my children will they be able to reach me or will there be numerous obstacles to endure because of this airport and museum? As property owners and parents we are requesting that the Weld County Planning Commission and the Weld County Board of County Commissioners to carefully scrutinize Mr . McDonalds amended application . For someone who has such a poor record in the past of violations on his current Special Use Permit , we feel that an amended permit should be out of the question . We would like to Thank the Planning Commission and the County Board of Commissioners in advance for listening and considering our concerns . Respectfully , 7/ GCS / ((J Chuck and lenda Er kin 37-Y49 Department of Planning Services �S Current Planner �)(\ln 915 10th St . Greeley , Co . 80631 MAR 2 / 1992 y u Weld County Planning Dear Mr . Schuett , This letter is in reference to the amended Use by Special Review Application recently submitted by Mr . James McDonald . I would like to bring my concerns to the attention of the Planning Commission , as well as , the Board of County Commissioners before the April 7th meeting of Weld County Planning . Mr . McDonalds current application states that he has a 3500 gallon water tank on the property for fire protection . The storage tank has been approved bu the Longmont Fire Protection District for current structures but will this be adequate for 32 acres dedicated to eleven museum displays and workshops , a house , an old style barn , a mobile home used as an office , forty hangers , twenty storage sheds , a log cabin , a school house , a church , a telegraph office and numerous buildings containing airplane salvage , unrestored collectibles and associated parts . I find it hard to believe that 3500 gallons of water could pro- tect that many structures . And what would happen should that fire spread to surrounding properties? We currently have problems with cars parking on Road 16 making access for emer- gency vehicles impossible . In contacting a Fire Protection District regarding an airplane fire , we were told that it required chemicals to contain a fire of that nature . Has Mr . McDonald made provisions for this kind of occurance or do we solely rely on emergency aid? Mr . McDonald has a past history of non-compliance of his current Special Use Permit , will he really commit to the necessities of the amended application? I urge the County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners to carefully study Mr . McDonalds amended application for com— patibility with future uses in the area . My Thanks to the Board of County Commissioners and the Planning Commission for their consideration in this matter . Respectf l)fy , L . y OHough , Jr . • Mr & Mrs R.G.Jubenville 7592 Weld County Rd 11 Longmont CO 80504 • • . - Weld County Commissioners Greeley, CO. Dear Commissioners: 4e have lived here since. 1965. :When we bought 20 acres out of this section of wheatland we had to wait until after harvest to take possession.. But we didn' t mind that or all the work it took to make: our home here. we. loved the rural atmosphere and the absolute quiet. Then the airport came along. To begin with this airport started without permission and over protests. 4Ihat they do is done first then permission asked after the fact and frequently continued after refusal. James McDonald and associates are regularly before the Comission answering violations and then submitting applications to cover the. situation. This can be historically documented. Each time they promise all regulations will be. followed,all violations corrected, and nothing new will be added. But if these: scoff-laws do anything it is done only in the most perfunctory manner passible. The newest application will however solve the problem and expense of frequent inspections,citations, and hearings. It grants Mr. McDonald and associates absolute carte blanche in everything and anything they might do or ever think of doing. The phrase "includes but. not limited to" covers it all. What unlimited power,.priviledge,s.eope of operation, and junkyard this could grant.. No. one would ever again be able to. question anything done at the airport. And who will have to live with this? 4e who make our homes here. Mr. McDonald has said for years he. plans to build his. house. out here. Is there any evidence? Or is he comfortably far away from the obscene language,the noise,the. traffic,the clouds of dust,the screaming ambulance,fi.re and police vehicles?' M.o s t importantly is it wise to grant Mr. McDonald such a far reaching liscense especially in view of his past track record? Please, we ask your careful consideration on this matter and we hope a refusal of this application. Yours .'ruly, r' n �11 20 _ �z2t�iX e_ iAarch 19 , 1992 Department of Planning Services Current Planner 915 10th St . D I , `th'ig10‘ ,. Greeley , Co . 80631 MAR 2 1 1992 CJ Dear Mr . Schuett , Weld County Planning I am writing this letter to voice my concerns with the amended Special Review Application submitted by Mr . James McDonald . My concerns are numerous however , if I mentioned them all , I would have enough chapters for a book so I will concentrate on the ones most disturbing to me . Our area has been agriculturally zoned so I fail to understand how Mr . McDonald has or will be allowed to collect funds from individuals for activities such as parachute jumping and bungee jumping . These activities may have been compatible when this area was more rural however , it has and is becoming , more urbanized , especially with the current planning of a 18 hole golf course and housing development on Road 18 . Mr . McDonalds airstrip , if properly maintained , is fine for his personal use but I do not find his amended application compatible with this area currently or in the future . Within the application , Mr . McDonald has stated that his intent is to have 80% or 32 acres as a museum and 20% or 8 acres as an airport to accomodate his friends and neighbors that fly , as well as his flying museum displays . How can 8 acres accomodate hot air balloons with bungee jumpers , helicopters , spray planes , gliders , ultralights , bungee jumping structures and parachute jumping? His property may have been an airport since 1930 but I don ' t believe anyone would have ever expected all of these activities to take place in that small of an area ! Mr . McDonald has made comment that he carries no home owners insurance . If the amended application is approved , will Weld Count ensure that Mr . McDonald has appropriate insurance coverage? Mr . Herson currently operates his jump facility with no insurance coverage ! Will Weld County ensure that he operates with appropriate insurance coverage? Because I am Mr . McDonalds neighbor , I could potentially lose livestock , my home and vehicles because he has no insurance . If an airplane crashed on the north end of his runway and started a fire , burned my barn or my home , I am liable for losses that he created . I believe that Mr . McDonalds dream for a museum is truly wonderful but I don ' t think he has obtained the amount of land required to accomodate that dream. Why isn ' t he more willing to fulfill that dream in more adequate surroundings? I would think a more rural setting would better facilitate his dream and offer his public following better enjoyment of that dream. /2 - 9 - 9/ littA,„:, f.)---heL_-14-t -A-AAA-4k el Or ..e ,R mom- :✓ 14- 74frr-A--- Ppol,%-el) j jaja24/ 732 �GielIate"" ±E± 1 91991 \U 920572 BEFORE THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Moved by Judy Yamaguchi that the following resolution be introduced for passage by the Weld County Planning Commission. Be it resolved by the Weld County Planning Commission that the application for: CASE NUMBER: Amended USR #537-3 NAME: James McDonald REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and an Amended Special Review permit for an open air museum, airport, jump facility and associated uses in the A (Agricultural) zone district. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the E2 W2 SW4 of Section 25, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: Adjacent to the Town of Frederick; east of Weld County Road 11, and north of and adjacent to Weld County Road 16. be continued until January 21, 1992. The applicant is requesting the Towns of Frederick, Firestone, and Dacono individually review and comment on this request. LeAnn Reid seconded the motion. VOTE: For Passage Against Passage Jean Hoffman Tom Rulon Judy Yamaguchi LeAnn Reid Don Feldhaus Shirley Camenisch Bud Clemons The Chairman declared the Resolution passed and ordered that a certified copy be forwarded with the file of this case to the Board of County Commissioners for further proceedings. CERTIFICATION OF COPY I, Sharyn Ruff, Recording Secretary for the Weld County Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution is a true copy of the Resolution of the Planning Commission of Weld County, Colorado, adopted on December 3, 1991. Dated the 4th of mber, 1991. Sharyn F. Ruff Secretary 920572 Date: November 26, 1991 CASE NUMBER: Amended USR #537-3 NAME: James McDonald REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and an Amended Special Review permit for an open air museum, airport, jump facility and associated uses in the A (Agricultural) zone district. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the E2 W2 SW4 of Section 25, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: Adjacent to the Town of Frederick; east of Weld County Road 11, and north of and adjacent to Weld County Road 16. The applicant has requested that this case scheduled for the December 3, 1991, Planning Commission Hearing, be continued to January 21, 1992. The applicant is requesting the Towns of Frederick, Firestone, and Dacono individually review and comment on this request. 920572 i /� mtrnoRnnDum hiDePlanning Commission Members January 14, 1992 To_ Date Keith A. Schuett, Current Planner COLORADO From / USR #537-3 for James McDonald Subject: Mr. McDonald submitted the attached letter regarding his Special Review Permit application. /- a- 9 letgalPdateciar. A1-"....--- I V JA"! 0.9-1992_ Weld County-plamrina _ - `'7y1 e.' ,c fa ....tecor an---cOfi / -2:7,.../ .....m.....tti t- 7:„„ty 444-41-1_; et-c-- c.cJ ace.- ` a AGENDA WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Tuesday, January 21, 1992 12:00 noon - Weld County Planning Commission Luncheon - Pepe O'Tooles, 2726 West 11th Street Road, Greeley, Colorado. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 1:30 p.m. - Public Meeting of the Weld County Planning Commission, County Commissioners' First Floor Hearing Room (#101) , Weld County Centennial Center, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado. ROLL CALL Bud Clemons - Chairman Judy Yamaguchi - Vice Chairman LeAnn Reid Jean Hoffman Don Feldhaus Richard Kimmel Shirley Camenisch Bill O'Hare Tom Rulon 1. APPLICANT: Jay L. Groom (continued from January 7, 1992) REQUEST: To amend the Weld County Comprehensive Plan LEGAL DESCRIPTION: N2 NE4 of Section 16, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: Approximately 2-1/4 miles southeast of the City of Longmont; west of and adjacent to Weld County Road 7, and 1 mile south of Colorado State Highway 119. 2. CASE NUMBER: USR-964 APPLICANT: Harold Andrews REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for the substitution of a nonconforming use, to include outside storage of vehicles over 6,000 pounds gross vehicle weight, in the I-1 (Industrial) zone district. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot B of RE-333, located in the SE4 of Section 9, T5N, R65W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: Approximately 1/2 mile east of the City of Greeley; north of 18th Street, and approximately 1000' west of Cedar Avenue. 3. CASE NUMBER: Amended USR-537-3 APPLICANT: James McDonald REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and an Amended Special Review permit for an open air museum, airport, jump facility, and associated uses in the A (Agricultural) zone district. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The E2 W2 SW4 of Section 25, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: Adjacent to the Town of Frederick; east of Weld County Road 11, and north of and adjacent to Weld County Road 16. BEFORE TH.. WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, PLANNING GOMMISSI*`-L' RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS,- r. Moved by Jean Hoffman that the following resolution be introduced forrp ssAge by the Weld County Planning Commission. Be it resolved by the Weld Opgnty_Planning Commission that the application for: CASE NUMBER: Amended USR 4537-3 NAME: James McDonald REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and an Amended Special Review permit for an open air museum, airport, jump facility and associated uses in the A (Agricultural) zone district. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the E2 W2 SW4 of Section 25, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: Adjacent to the Town of Frederick; east of Weld County Road 11, and north of and adjacent to Weld County Road 16. be continued, based on the applicants request to amend the application, until April 7, 1992, at 1:30 p.m. Motion seconded by Don Feldhaus. VOTE: For Passage Against Passage Richard Kimmel Jean Hoffman Tom Rulon Bill O'Hare Judy Yamaguchi Don Feldhaus Shirley Camenisch Bud Clemons The Chairman declared the Resolution passed and ordered that a certified copy be forwarded with the file of this case to the Board of County Commissioners for further proceedings. CERTIFICATION OF COPY I, Sharyn F. Ruff, Recording Secretary for the Weld County Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution is a true copy of the Resolution of the Planning Commission of Weld County, Colorado, adopted on January 21, 1992. D ed the 2 .t of Ja .ry, 1992 haryn F. Ruff 4-2 Secretary 3.r..113579 4611(eitly mEmoRAnDum WII'Ie To Keith Schuett. Planning Date November 19 1991 COLORADO From Drew Scheltinga, County Engineer � J Subject: James McDonald, USR-537-3 The applicant is proposing a dramatic expansion from the existing use. He indicates the possibility of 1000 museum patrons per day and up to 100 employees. Also, his application would allow the construction of a number of buildings and airplane hangers. The gravel roads that serve the area would not support the additional traffic generated by the proposed facility. The increase would make surface maintenance and dust control unmanageable. If the applicant is granted this use, he should be required to enter into a Road Improvements Agreement with the Board of Weld County Commissioners that would address paving roads that access the site. The addition of the proposed buildings would definitely increase the storm water discharge from the site. The site drains to the west across neighboring properties and onto County Road 11. The applicant should be required to provide a storm water plan that would address how run off is to be handled on- site, detention facilities, and effects to downstream properties. Two entrances are shown from Weld County Road 16. It is my understanding one is to be used for a residential purpose, and the other to be used as a commercial entrance to the airport and museum. The residential access should be restricted to that use, and the commercial access paved and upgraded to a standard suited to the traffic. Acceleration and deceleration lanes are not warranted because of limited use by heavy vehicles. 1,81 I 1-11L11,111\vnq 7191/ 2 1991 freft?Ceu,; usfa 1 DS/mw:prmcd.mrw cc: Commissioner Harbert Planning Referral File - James McDonald, USR-537-3 92O ril r_ N0V 2 1991 FIELD CHECK FILING NUMBER: Amended USR #537-3 DATE OF INSPECTION: /V/2/9/ APPLICANT'S NAME: James M. McDonald CURRENT PLANNER: Keith A. Schuett REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and an Amended Special Review permit for an open air museum, airport, jump facility, and associated uses in the A (Agricultural) zone district. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the E2 S2 SW4 of Section 25, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: Adjacent to the Town of Frederick; east of Weld County Road 11 and north of and adjacent to Weld County Road 16. L} ' � LAND USE: N �`�- E yi�J ,,� /`J' /J S I� /L // .�../��- �n — 1/1 /..,00_44_,C (.mss Rt W if-{'�d-fs- Lriteck "i- (27Le.PKL,'LLcreg1 ZONING: N A (Agricultural) E A (Agricultural) S Town of Frederick, P.U.D. W A (Agricultural) COMMENTS: I -a.AO .-1-4ACel-e-≤2---teCZLiet A 7/21-T744,riAtiy.-a4cefr&i, Lte V // /L4 /A.4 / U- / ¢L //111�pn' �//� "��97/(/,f� y//�j ad ,, 0 7 ILO ":Si 1 n� /�YWIota Q ///� I ice-�(J CAS% �[.i(.�i(.l.., W O+ ("WA, 7)/1 -12444,K !y t�ti1!/r� 11-4 / .(�'G4'nt .(�o t�.('X Li 7.ti del,PC-ftf 7 ( L."- °at y(kis) . /6r 6 R3 f cu a d-4vt if.12.11-44.4-4- 1 0_0_4444_ C3�,, X, (h Stto / t e.c�-eEeszt b i .9--e/-d Qtv9). . C ekt-i (;0 , 1au v2ev�ette. 40 a..lPv (J re �e/led cu-/ c�� ,� c/ z 6_ c- . �-1 Ct�: �:.7 h-t- �-v`eP c ,tin lJ'1'/,e'�- Lott' mEmoRAnDum hiD a To Weld County Planning Date December 2. 1991 COLORADO From Wes Potter. Director, Environmental Protection Sery c soeiectCase Number: Amended USR-537 Name: James M. McDonald Environmental Protection Services has reviewed this proposal and recommends for approval, subject to the following conditions: 1. All liquid and solid wastes shall be stored and removed for final disposal in a manner that protects against surface and groundwater contamination. 2. No permanent disposal of wastes shall be permitted at this site. 3. All waste materials shall be handled, stored, and disposed in a manner that controls fugitive dust, blowing debris, and other potential nuisance conditions. 4. Fugitive dust shall be controlled on this site. 5. The maximum permissible noise level shall not exceed the industrial limit of 80 dB(A) , as measured according to 25-12-102, Colorado Revised Statutes. 6. An I.S.D.S. Evaluation on any existing septic systems will be necessary, prior to issuing the required septic permits on the existing systems. 7. Bathrooms with adequate toilet facilities served by an individual sewage disposal system, are required for the proposed facility and shall be installed according to the Weld County Individual Sewage Disposal Regulations. The use of portable toilets will not be acceptable at this facility. 8. The septic system is required to be designed by a Colorado Registered Professional Engineer according to the Weld County Individual Sewage Disposal Regulations. WP/lam-892 6awuana kLaoo PPM 1661 o 33a 1c 1n � I . P, C United States Soil 9595 Nelson Road, Box D iita Department of Conservation Longmont, CO 80501 Agriculture Service 776-4034 November 26, 1991 J p. l ;L a'r1. '` r! '! 1991 Department of Planning Services � - ------ --- 915 10th Street 1.,— „JE * Greeley, CO 80631 Jim McDonald asked me to write you a follow-up letter regarding their Site Specific Development Plan. He said via a phone conversation, the maximum number of animals to graze will be two sheep over 40 acres. I have not taken an inventory of the area nor looked at the range site description, but do believe that two sheep will not harm the vegetative resource. Fencing could be used in the area to better manage the resource and give part of the area a rest each year. Continuous grazing over the entire area throughout the year promotes spot grazing which is not good for the vegetation. Splitting the area into two or more pastures would create a more even grazing pattern over the area. Sincerely, ckr J ard J Mullaney' District Conservationist cc: James McDonald 4 14/fMOCOI/NTY j '991 4///POul -______..__.___....�_ P.O. Box 727. area 00 8062 .V3/,R -9141 R4X903/35626y December 17, 1991 Dept. of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 • To Whom It May Concern, This letter is written in response to the application for an Ammended Special Review Permit filed with the Weld County Planning Office on behalf of Mr. James McDonald and the Fredrick/ Firestone Airport -- "Wings & Things Museum and Airport" (Case # USR 537-3) . I understand that this is a private use airport, and that many of the guidelines and regulations set forth for public use airports may not be applicable in this case, however, there is purpose to these guidelines -- and that is to help ensure a safe operating environment for airport users as well as the surrounding community. I would like to point out some of the safety guidelines as may be found in Federal Aviation Administration Advisory Circular 150/5300-13 that I believe should be considered when planning future use at this facility. For example: (1) Runway Object Free Area (as denoted by the orange lines drawn onto the plot plan) -- depicts a ground area approximately 250 feet in width (125' either side of runway centerline) which should remain clear of all objects except those objects that are fixed by function (such as navigation antannae) critical to aircraft operations . It is evident that a number of structures/ buildings encroach into this area, including the "future old fort," an entire row of aircraft hangars that run parallel to, and apparently actually touch along the edge of the actual runway, several museum display workshops , a tie-down display area, several undefined future historic buildings , and a number of "display pedestals" and display areas ; (2) Runway Safety Area -- this is an area which in this case should be at least 120 feet in width (60' either side of runway centerline) which should be prepared or suitable for reducing the risk of damage to airplanes in the event of an undershoot, overshoot, or excursion from the runway (requires an absence of ditches, obstacles , and debris) ; (3) Aircraft Parking Area -- runway separation standards outlined to provide an area at least 125 feet in width (62.5' either side of runway centerline) in which no aircraft should be parked. This helps to avoid incidents involving landing/taxiing aircraft from colliding with parked aircraft; (4) Runway Visibility Zone -- there are guidelines which necessitate free and unobstructed visibility between the ends of intersecting runways to help ensure that two aircraft operating on opposing runways may see one another, thus avoiding a simultaneous take-off and collision with one another at the intersection -- the erection of museum workshops , displays , and a house/duplex between the J20"2 ' ends of the existing runways would preclude this line-of-sight requirement; (5) Obstruction Clearance guidelines for approach end of runways would also be viewed as being in violation of safety standards -- no object should penetrate a surface that starts at the threshold of the runway centerline and slopes upward from the threshold at a slope ratio of 20:1. The road on the south side of the property (WCR 16) constitutes a 15' obstacle by FAA Standards -- at a ratio of 20:1 this would dictate that the threshold of the runway should be moved 300' into the property from the road. Additionally, the 4' fence on the north side of the property would dictate that the runway be moved 80' into the property from that end for proper obstacle clearance. These and other safety issues should warrant further evaluation and consideration. Recommendations to promote a safer operating environment would include: (1) Construction of one runway running north/south located toward the east side of the property -- this will help remove the landing surface from close proximity to the large array of buildings, displays , and obstacles as proposed. Additionally, the difference in magnetic alignment of the two existing runways is nearly negligible (less than 20 degrees) , and therefore it appears there is no real forseeable benefit to having two runways as opposed to one; (2) Eliminate all proposed structures , displays , exhibits , jump zones , parking areas , etc. that encroach into the Runway Object Free Area -- there are several high safety concerns with having any obstacles within this area, particularly the high number of obstacles as proposed. In the event that an aircraft loses control or departs the runway to either side for some reason, the existence of the number of obstacles as proposed would almost certainly insure collision with one or more of those obstacles and/or other aircraft and individuals -- possibly causing great harm and damage to persons and property; (3) Several inconsistencies exist with the design plan as currently drawn -- the existence of a jump zone located within a display area does not prove to be a productive relationship, as a jump zone should also be free of obstacles . The area allotted for future parking of 500 cars is far too small an area to accommodate such a number of vehicles -- this area is also described as another jump zone which would also not prove conducive to such an activity while also serving as a parking lot. Locating and constructing a single north/south runway to the eastern side of the property, free of all obstacles on either side of the runway, as well as bringing the approach ends of the runway inward to provide for proper obstacle clearance outward from the thresholds -- in conjunction with locating all display areas to the west side of the property, would certainly improve levels of safety at the airport. I would like to point out that the proposed operations at the "Wings & Things Museum and Airport" meet none of the safety criteria required for public use airports , and I would hope that Mr. McDonald reconsider some of his planned operations , designs , and additional structures that may prove to be detrimental to flight safety at his facility. Sincerely, Kevin S. Bunnell Airport Manager 0011 l‘r DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE;303)355-4000.EAT.4400 3,5,Cth STREET MAR 2 6 1992 COLORADO Weld County Planning March 11, 1992 CASE NUMBER. ,',mended TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is a revised application from James M. McDonald for a Site Specific Development Plan and an Amended Special Review permit for an open air museum, airport, jump facility and associated uses in the A (Agricultural) zone district. The parcel of land is described as part of the E2 W2 SW4 of Section 25, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is adjacent to the Town of Frederick, east of Weld County Road 11 and north of an adjacent to Weld County Road 16. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by March 24, 1992, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Keith A. Schuett, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. X We have reviewed this request and find that it Ctp6 S no t does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. SEE A i T/ CHED 1.ETTG,e 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: 3. We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. )( Please refer to the enclosed letter. �J Signed:C-//�� 62 iice, ,,,�,�,it, Agency: 7Z ,-y, / �sL4�fp.-rc-rAC. Date: 3 - 21 - /99 2 92072 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE(303)356-4000, EXT.4400 &': 915 10th STREET GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 MAR 2 49n COLORADO wewcorPia� �s March 11, 1992 CASE NUMBER: Amended USR ; 537-3 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is a revised application from James M. McDonald for a Site Specific Development Plan and an Amended Special Review permit for an open air museum, airport, jump facility and associated uses in the A (Agricultural) zone district. The parcel of land is described as part of the E2 W2 SW4 of Section 25, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is adjacent to the Town of Frederick, east of Weld County Road 11 and north of an adjacent to Weld County Road 16. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by March 24, 1992, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Keith A. Schuett, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons : 3. We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: X 5. 1 ase re the enclosed letter. Signed: Agency: Tri-Area Planning Commission March 23 , 1992 ill TRI-AREA PLANNING COMMISSION P.O.BOX 363 FREDERICK, COLORADO 80530 14 December 1991 L( Li r -' t Mr. Keith Schuett Weld County Planning 915 Tenth Street Greeley, CO 80631 RE: McDonald Use By Special Review Dear Mr. Schuett: The above captioned application was reviewed by Tri-Area Planning on November 5th and the resulting negative recom- mendation forwarded. Subsequently, the applicant appeared before the Dacono Planning Commission requesting their approval . Appropriately, the matter was referred back to Tri-Area Planning. In keeping with the Commission By-Laws, and the intent of inter-municipal cooperation, a rehearing of the McDonald application by Tri-Area Planning is scheduled for January 7 , 1992 . The original scheduling precluded the applicants ' appearance and this will cure that defect. Tri-Area Planning will advise immediately following this hearing as to rejection or affirmation of the prior deter- mination. Si erply, ay .Curtis , Chairman cc: Tri-Area Planning Members James McDonald Russell/Widger 820.S7? 11/13/91 09:41 '1303 '1 7702 MNT VIEW FIRE PD Id 003 • 4 = MOUNTAIN VIEW FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 700 Weaver Park Road, Longmont, CO 80501 (303) 772-0710 Metro(303) 666-4404 • • November 12,-1991 - - . Mr: Keith A. Schuett, Current Planner Department of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 • Dear Mn Schueu: RE: Amended USR#537-3 . Airport and Mnse,im 5129 WCR 16 I have reviewed-the submitted=Prints and drawings for compliance with the Uniform Foe Code and the Fire Protection Development Standards, as adopted by the Fire District- Below are listed the items that are needed to comply with these standards: 1.. The minimum required fire flow for a commercial development is 2500 gallons per minute at 20 psi residual pressure. This may be provided by connection to a water system of a municipality or.water district or by oncitestorage_ The water • • supply, whether provided by a'Water system or onsite storage, must be able to . . "Maintain this fire flow for 120 minutes. If onsite storage is selected as the .. method of providing the required fire flow, fire pumps to provide the required flow and pressure must comply with National Fire Protection Association (N.FP.A.) Standard 20, Standard fir the Installation of Cerunifugal Fire Pumps. (Fire Protection Development Standards Section 5.02-3) 2. Based on the required fire flow, a minimum of three fire hydrants are required to be installed on the site. These are to be served by the water system described _ in Item 1 above. The average spacing between hydrants is 450 feet_ I3ydrant and underground piping installed shall comply with N.RP.A. Standard 24 Standard for the Instalation of Private Fire Service Mains and Their Appurtenances_(Fire Protection Development Standards Section 6.04-1) 3. Fuel tanks, piping and dispensing units installed on the site must comply with -all.requirements of the Uniform Fire Code Article 79. Contact the Fire District for specific requirements and details. A permit from the Fire District is required • for installation or alteration of fuel tanks, piping or dispensing units • . 1 N0V 13 ' 91 10:36 305-151 7702 PRGE . 003 920572 }' 11/13/91 09:41 233 651 7702 AQiT VIEW FIRE P. ®004 4. • Hangers, museum display buildings and workshops future must comply om lyiwith all the water qi Sri foents forrequired equ it flow, access and the future construction Required fire flow, number is f hydra Important t anticipate location is dependent on the type of construction andYdsqutr and uare hydrant of won. The 2500 gallon fire flow o'Idirt� footage minimum fire flow for a commercial site. For example, a 20,000 is the building could require a fire flow of 3,750 gallons for foot construction types. It is im per minute for cMtain • with the Fire District to avoid dcconflicts with coordinate plans for Enure �ns� on 5. If the workshops are to include spray painting operations for aircraft or vehicles, those spray painting rooms, areas or booths shall comply with Article 45 of the Uniform Fire Code. 6. The Fire District has adopted a plans check and inspection fee. For future reviews of construction plans on this site, the Fire District should be contacted for the amount of the fee. Sincerely, Charles E. Bo s Fire Prevention Specialist CC: William Emerson, Acting Chief of District Mark Lawley, Division Chief, Fire Prevention 2 NOV 13 '91 10:36 •• 303 651 7702 PRGE. 004 e7� •• U.S. Department _ -� DENVER AIRPORTS DISTRICT OFFICE of Transportation ��'� V GI��— 5440 Roslyn Street Federal Aviation Suite 300 DECAdministration UL 1991 i Denver, Colorado 80216-6026 (303 )286-5527 Weld Count?Pla+nninn December 4, 1991 Weld County Department of Planning Services Mr. Keith A. Schuett 915 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Dear Mr. Schuett: Re: Case Number 537-7 This is a follow-up to our telephone conversation of November 25, 1991 in which you requested comments regarding the physical development at the Fredrick-Firestone Airport. The airport is a private-use airport and as such is not required to conform to Federal Aviation Administration design standards. If this were a public-use facility, we would recommend that the proposed buildings be kept at a minimum of 125 feet from the runway centerline. Please contact me at the above number if you have any questions. Sincerely, Laura Littrell Airport Planner 9a15742 SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS/INTEREST AND/OR MINERAL OWNERS James M. McDonald Amended USR #537-3 Leslie and Aline Grisham P.O. Box 43 Firestone, CO 80520 Cecil A. and Michelle J. Miller 7402 Weld County Road 11 Longmont, CO 80505 Donald D. and Shirley J. Gooden 7352 Weld County Road 11 Longmont, CO 80505 Jon 0. and Lori A. Foote 5059 Weld County Road 16 Longmont, CO 80505 Edward A. and Carol L. Herson P.O. Box 27 Frederick, CO 80530 Ronald G. and Katherine M. Gaulte N. 6637 S. Island View Drive Watertown, WI 53094 Frank Munoz P.O. Box 494 Firestone, CO 80520 Charles L. and Denise Stewart 7200 Weld County Road 11 Longmont, CO 80505 Russell G. and Helen I. Jubenville 7592 Weld County Road 11 Longmont, CO 80505 Willie B. and Myra Smith 1039 Gay Street Longmont, CO 80501-4312 Charles C. and Glenda M. ERskine 1039 Gay Street Longmont, CO 80501-4312 920572 SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS/INTEREST AND/OR MINERAL OWNERS James M. McDonald Amended USR #537-3 Page 2 Patricia L. and Killough L.R. Davis 1039 Gay Street Longmont, CO 80501-4312 Dacona Investment Company 6825 Tennessee #235 Denver, CO 80224 Amoco Oil 200 E. Randolph Chicago, IL 60601 AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS SURFACE ESTATE Application No. Subject Property STATE OF COLORADO ss. COUNTY OF WELD ) THE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn, states that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names, addresses, and the corresponding Parcel Identification Number assigned by the Weld County Assessor of the owners' of property (the surface estate) within five hundred feet of the property under consideration This list was compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor, or an ownership update from a title or abstract company or attorney, derived from such records, or from the records of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. The list compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor shall have been assembled within thirty days of the application's submission date. The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me this day a7G 1,Ce , 1912/, by �J H/+?GS /' /. YJi1/A2.-1/) WITNESS my hand and official seal. MY Commission expires: /G *3-' s j No Public My Commission Expires: 92;0572 • NAMES OF OWNERS OF PROPERTY WITHIN 500 FEET Please print or type NAME ADDRESS, TOWN/CITY, STATE AND ZIP CODE ASSESSOR IDENTIFICATION # Leslie & Aline Grisham P.O. Box 43 Firestone CO 80520 131325000006 Cecil S. & Michelle J. Miller 7402 WCR 11 Longmont CO 80505 131325000007 Donald D. &Shirley J. Gooden 7352 WCR 11 Longmont CO 80505 131325000008 Jon 0. & Lori A. Foote 5059 NCR 16 Longmont CO 80505 131325000010 Edward A. & Carol L. Herson P.O. Box 27 Frederick CO 80530 131325000011 N. 6637 S. Island View Dr Ronald G. & Katherine M. Gaulte Watertown_ WI 53094 131325000013 Frank Munoz P.O. Box 494 Firestone CO 80520 131325000053 Charles L. & Denise Stewart 7200 WCR 11 Longmont CO 80505 131325000054 Russell G & Helen I Jubenville 7592 WCR 11 Longmont CO 80505 131325203003 Willie B. & Myrna Smith 1039 Gay St. Longmont CO 80501-4312 131325203004 Charles C. & Glenda M. Erskine " y „ „ „ Patricia L. & Killough L. R. Davis " " " II II II „ „ 6825 Tennessee #235 Dacona Investment Co. Denver CO 80224 133336000019 3205 72 AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS MINERALS AND/OR SUBSURFACE ESTATE Application No. Subject Property STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss COUNTY OF WELD ) THE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn, states that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names and addresses of all mineral owners and lessees of mineral owners on or under the parcel of land under as their names appear upon the records in the Weld County Clerk and Recorder's Office or from an ownership update from a title or abstract company or an attorney. -1 The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me this �p,B�2 day of � , 1.99./. WITNESS my hand and official seal. My Commission Expires: /per ! �\Y lf �2e, "4/9('-- ( l r o4a,y Public 9205" 2 Mineral Owner • JAMES M MC DONALD 11940 W Independence Golden, Co 80401 LESSEE AMOCO OIL 200 E Randolph Dr Chicago, Ill 60601 920572 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING I hereby certify that I have placed a true and correct copy of the surrounding property owners and owners and lessees of minerals in accordance with the notification requirements of Weld County in Case Number Amended USR #537-3 for James M. McDonald in the United States Mail, postage prepaid First Class Mail by letter as addressed on the attached list. this 31st day of October, 1991. SZZ rs DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE(303)35&4000,EXT.4400 1C. GREELEY, 91510th STREET COLORADO 80631 COLORADO TO: SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS CASE NUMBER: Amended USR #537-3 There will be a Public Hearing before the Weld County Planning Commission on Tuesday, December 3, 1991, at 1:3O p.m. in the County Commissioners' Hearing Room, First Floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 1Oth Street, Greeley, Colorado concerning the request of: NAME: James M. McDonald -11 FOR: A Site Specific Development Plan and an Amended Special Review permit for an open air museum, airport, jump facility, and associated uses in the A (Agricultural) zone district. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the E2 W2 SW4 of Section 25, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: Adjacent to the Town of Frederick; east of Weld County Road 11, north of and adjacent to Weld County Road 16. Your property is within five-hundred (500) feet of the property or you own minerals rights on the property on which this request has been made. For additional information write or telephone Keith A. Schuett, Current Planner. 9205x? �s • 0 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE(303)358-4000,EXT.4400 915 10th STREET GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 COLORADO October 30, 1991 James McDonald &5129 Weld County Road 16 Longmont, CO 80501 Subject: Amended USR #537-3 - Request for a Site Specific Development Plan and an Amended Special Review permit for an open air museum, airport, jump facility, and associated uses the A (Agricultural) zone district on a parcel of land described as Part of the E2 W2 SW4 of Section 25, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. Dear Mr. McDonald: Your application and related materials are being processed for the request described above. I have scheduled a meeting with the Weld County Planning Commission for December 3, 1991, at 1:30 p.m. This meeting will take place in the County Commissioners' Hearing Room, first floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado. It is recommended that you and/or a representative be in attendance to answer any questions the Planning Commission members might have with respect to your application. It is the policy of Weld County to refer an application of this nature to any town or municipality lying within three miles of the property in question or if the property under consideration is location within the comprehensive planning area of a town or municipality. Therefore, our office has forwarded a copy of the submitted materials to the Tri-Area Planning Commission for its review and comments. Please call Jay Curtis at 659-8112 for further details regarding the date, time, and place of this meeting. It is recommended that you and/or a representative be in attendance at the Tri-Area Planning Commission Meeting to answer any questions the Commission members may have with respect to your application. It is the responsibility of an applicant to see that a sign is posted on the property under consideration at least 10 days preceding the hearing date. Sometime prior to November 15, 1991, you or a representative should call me to obtain a sign to be posted on the site no later than November 19, 1991. The sign shall be posted adjacent to and visible from a publicly maintained road right-of-way. In the event the property under consideration is not adjacent to a publicly maintained road right- of-way, the applicant shall post one sign in the most prominent place on the property and post a second sign at the point at which the driveway (access drive) intersects a publicly maintained road right-of-way. Your sign posting certificate must be returned to the Department of Planning Services' office on or before the date of the hearing. 920C-79 ` i S� James McDonald Amended USR #537-3 Page 2 The Department of Planning Services' staff will make a recommendation concerning this application to the Weld County Planning Commission. This recommendation will be available twenty-four (24) hours before the scheduled hearing. It is the responsibility of the applicant to call the Department of Planning Services' office before the Planning Commission hearing to make arrangements to obtain the recommendation. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to call me. Respectfully, �Ksr�� lll� Current Planner 92OS72 (llit ;;Nrs%\ DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE(303)356-4000,EXT.4400 I 91510th STREET GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 C. COLORADO November 26, 1991 James McDonald 5129 Weld County Road 16 Longmont, Colorado 80501 Subject: Referrals received on the Amended Special Use Permit #537 located in the E2 W2 SW4 of Section 25, T2N, R68W, of the 6th P.M. Weld County, Colorado. Dear Mr. McDonald: Enclosed are copies of additional referral responses that have been received on your Amened Special Use Permit Application. These responses are from the following: 1. Kevin Bunnell, Manager Greely Weld County Airport 2. Laura Littrell, Airport Planner Federal Aviation Administration 3. Richard J. Mullaney, District Conservationist, Soil Conservation Service. 4. Wes Potter, Environmental Protection Services Please review these additional responses. This information and the other referral responses that have been received are important to your application. Please call me for an appointmernt as soon as possible to review this information. Respectfully, eith A. Schuett Current Planner KAS/sfr Enclosure -PC; Case file Amended Special Use Permit #537 Jim McDonald P.O. Box 646 Federick, Co 80530 920572 November 10, 1991 Mr. Keith Schuett Current Planner Department of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 RE : Amended USR - #537-3 Dear Mr. Schuett : The Tri-Area Planning Commission considered the above captioned application on November 5, 1991 , a review of the application and evaluation of the objections from adjacent property owners compelled the Commission to unanimously recommend denial of the application for amendment . The following consideration9led to the recommendation : 1 . Safety concerns resulting from increased air traffic and potentially larger aircraft if uses are expanded; 2 . Continued and increased incidences of trtdspassing from uncontrolled or uncontrollable activities; 3 . History of zoning violations to the extent that annexation discussiore were terminated ; no indications were given that the approval of this application would improve the relationships within the neighborhood or any other complainants; 4. The present airport is bounded by roads 11 , 16 3/4 and 18 . Adjacent to the existing facility are single family residences and small to medium agricultural operations (crops, hay, livestock, etc . ) 5 . Referencing the application, page 2 , item 2e - " . . .users could be up to 1 ,000 per day. . . , " item 2f - " . . .employees . . .could grow to 100. . .hours of operation from daylight to sunset, " item 2i - " . . .traffic. . .could consist of 500 vehicles per day. " The foregoing projections compels concern for substantial traffic increases and the resulting safety and pollution effects . Roads 11 and 16 are gravel roads and minimally maintained. 6 . Items 2g and j appear to be deficient considering the applicants desired increase in activity. Considering the applicants intentions , we feel the desired activities are not compatible with agriculturally zoned areas, exceed the ancillary purpose originally intended, and disregard the health and safety of adjacent residents . 920572 Mr. Keith Schuett Current Planner Department of Planning Services Page 2 41-0 Louis Evezich, Evanston Iva Renner, Dacono Bill Schroeder, Frederick Sandy Fr Fi estone hairman 920572 Longmont Soil Conservation District 9595 Nelson Road, Box D-Longmont, CO 80501 -(303) 776-4034 November 14, 1991 Weld County Department of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Re: Case Number: Amended USR #537-3 James M. McDonald Gentlemen: This is in reply to the application from James M. McDonald for a Site Specific Development Plan and Amended Special Review Permit. In the application, it states under "Application 2. Item I. Livestock will not exceed the number allowed, and Item p. Erosion control is added by vegetative cover." It is recommended that a vegetative inventory be completed and plans developed to establish proper grazing amounts and erosion control during the process. Sincerely, Mit'e&jc cz: 82.64:46pA0 Louis Rademacher President LR:rah ® 1 199tql Veld Cel il320,572 CONSERVATION - DEVELOPMENT - SELF-GOVERNMENT • �ti flo DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE(303)358-<510 EXT.4400 91510th STREET GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 Iodic COLORADO November 14, 1991 James McDonald 15129 Weld County Road 16 Longmont, CO 80501 Subject: Referrals received on the Amended R68W of the Permit 6t t #5 7 locatedCountyn the E2 W2 SW4 of Section 25, Colorado. Dear Mr. McDonald: Enclosed are copies of referral responses that have been received on your Amended Special Use Permit application. These responses are from the following: 1. Longmont Soil Conservation District. 2. Mountain View Fire Protection District. 3. Federal Aviation Administration. 4. Tri-Area Planning Commission. Please review these responses and provide the additional information requested by the referral agency. This information is important to your application and should to be completed as soon as possible to allow the County Planning staff enough time to review the information you and the referral agency provide. The Planning staff will also need this information to complete the staff' s recommendation to the Planning Commission. A copy of any information provided to a referral agency must also be sent to me. Please write me if you have any questions. Respectfully, 7 1/417/Ve494 Current Planner KAS/sfr pc: Case file Amended Special Use Permit #537 Jim McDonald P.O. Box 646 Frederick, CO 80530 920572 DENVER AIRPORTS DISTRICT OFFICE U.S. Departmenttation 5440 Roslyn Street of Transpor Suite 300 Federal Aviation Suter, Colorado 80216-6026 Administration 286-5527 November 8 ,1991 Weld County Department of Planning Services Mr. Keith A. Schuett 915 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Dear Mr. Schuett: Re: Case Number #537-3 The Airports District Office has reviewed must provide detailiewed the proposal for ed e Fredrick-Firestone Airport. The app information on the jumping activity to the Air Traffic Division of the Federal Aviation Administration. Their address is: Federal Aviation Administration Northwest Mountain Regional Office ANM-530 1601 Lind Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-4056 Air Traffic will be reviewing the jumping activities from the standpoint of safe and effecient use of airspace. Please contact me at the above number if you have any questions. Sincerely, CuttVG,riattie L Laura Littrell Airport Planner 920572 ( pet ;op DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE(303)356-4000,EXT.4400 915 10th ST REET STREREET GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 Ewe COLORADO November 26, 1991 James McDonald 5129 Weld County Road 16 Longmont, Colorado 80501 se t 537 Subject: theeE2 W2 SW4eof Section e255,,eT2N, R68w, ofU the P6th 1 � located P.M.. Weld County, Colorado. Dear Mr. McDonald: on Enclosed are copies of referral responses e poncehese that ave c are ef r receivedm the follow your Amended Special Use Permit Application. 1. Weld County Office of Emergency Management 2. Weld County Engineering Department Please review these responses and provide any additional information requested. A copy of any information provided to a referral agency is to be sent to me also. This information is important to your application. The Planning staff will also need this information to complete the Staff' s recommendation to the Planning Commission. Please write me if you have any questions. Respectfully, % / '--: Kait�k<hetC'r :' Current Planner pc: se File Amended Special Use Permit #537 Jim McDonald P.O. Box 646 Frederick, CO 80530 920S72 EXN -Alt We the . - .: '� residents of Weld county after tam reviewing `- . s ication submitted by James M. McDonald, 5129 Weld County Road 16, Longmont, CO to amend Special Use Permit USR-537:85: 14 do hereby object to the granting of the proposed amendment. We also request the Weld County Commissioners take action regarding non compliance of the existing permit and ensure it be brought into compliance. I have reviewed the application •FNo�(#014-5- i3,eazOVic N 5 Na bate Name Signature O a )rc_R // 5----“( Goo frr, Address p / p Location `!/7 /�C� ��u�� i lL � 17�i 2 2t�crF l,' e-et �Lu—tti� Common, eiso I have reviewed the application : :AD , Name Signature Date (� � A hgCrfSi Location Comments We the undersigned residents of Weld county after reviewing the application submitted by James M. McDonald, 5129 Weld County Road 16, Longmont, CO to amend Special Use Permit USR-537:85: 14 do hereby object to the granting of the proposed amendment. We also request the Weld County Commissioners take action regarding non compliance of the existing permit and ensure it be brought into compliance. I have reviewed the application si4/vAI>nR /P/ UE,e/� Jodi-1010k Date Name Signature G 6 3y S,2s rk'o,v7 A-G e- ,C Address Location Comments I have reviewed the application : Name- Signature Date 9/414 / sus Location Comments 2l r7.... f L/ 1 :r L 7/!-;t _'sec' .. er;Arli in ,I We the undersigned residents of Weld county after reviewing the application submitted by James M. McDonald, 5129 Weld County Road 16, Longmont, CO to amend Special Use Permit USR-537:85: 14 do hereby object to the granting of the proposed amendment. We also request the Weld County Commissioners take action regarding non compliance of the existing permit and ensure it be brought into compliance. I have reviewed the application : Nam* nature Date X717 1�1 •g A L Address `--T ocation Comments tin I have reviewed the application : JEFF if %L.p , % <.ora s ` r Name natur , Date \ Address Wation Comments We the undersigned residents of Weld county after reviewing the application submitted by James M. McDonald, 5129 Weld County Road 16, Longmont, CO to amend Special Use Permit USR-537:85: 14 do hereby object to the granting of the proposed amendment. We also request the Weld County Commissioners take action regarding non compliance of the existing permit and ensure it be brought into compliance. I have reviewed the application : rrev mr��i5 At tTze . q/5/92. Name C Signature i Date 5-77'4 L-25 K+ . 1.... Lon most, &)&W NY I plat Address Location Comments trio I have reviewed the application j_ : h / ,DR%Alur Zing 7 .a • C� z, �.H 5�',5=9.,�Name \ /Signature I Date 1 77, 4 102J lieLG kcal k ZoivGMON (7/7 �S5-050,1 / ' �e , s Location Comments • Sr.,577 WE the undersigned residents of Weld county after reviewing the application submitted by James M. McDonald, 5129 Weld County Road 16, Longmont, CO to amend Special Use Permit USR-537:85: 14 do hereby object to the granting of the proposed amendment. We also request the Weld County Comma sioners take action regarding non compliance of the existing permit and ensure it be brought into compliance. I have reviewed the application : /int usr gc.6-17.2. Nam a a Date 627.7-V. 47kr Address Location Com nts I have reviewed the application : T�7 /it'syfv.� 47-5---9.? Name Signature Date /Nostrils Location X /7raM -� C� . �0 ��/ Comments S 0 ry We the undersigned residents of Weld county after reviewing the application submitted by James M. McDonald, 5129 Weld County Road 16, Longmont, CO to amend Special Use Permit USR-537:85: 14 do hereby object to the granting of the proposed amendment. We also request the Weld County Commissioners take action regarding non compliance of the existing permit and ensure it be brought into compliance. I have reviewed the application : limp.. Signat re Cr Date 5%,:1 t GK 1 r Address Location 1-c n rno C C 6 1� Comments ) 1 11 'f ct rk S to) I have reviewed the application : Name Signature Date 1 hz.7" .25 f/ ��/ J <-z !✓y.�;°e ,.�/, C€½ ' Address Location Comments • wr.:s ....Li:aY7 We the undersigned residents of Weld county after reviewing the application submitted by James M. McDonald, 5129 Weld County Road 16, Longmont, CO to amend Special Use Permit USR-537:85: 14 do hereby object to the granting of the proposed amendment. We also request the Weld County Commissioners take action regarding non compliance of the existing permit and ensure it be brought into compliance. I have reviewed the application /� IZ Name Signature ate eG/ (-Us—ez, /rd7c/ /3 A), e . Address Location Comments / J et Cc e eee�, ta/ I have reviewed the application : / a > Nanrr Siynature to 9‘6 / &le /3 it), 6" Aidrus Location S d/_ Com ents 87"579 We the undersigned residents of Weld county after reviewing the application submitted by James M. McDonald, 5129 Weld County Road 16, Longmont, CO to amend Special Use Permit USR-537:85: 1 4 do hereby object to the granting of the proposed amendment. We also request the Weld County Commissioners take action regarding non compliance of the existing permit and ensure it be brought into compliance. I have reviewed the application : �'—0 n A- Moor 2 c-4--��--ec_ c a�L ei Name Signature Date � 5 °14, �� C� SQs-O Address Location Comments h4"-i-C4 have reviewed the application . /I* / Qh Name Signature Data 76 / ft G C ate— _ - 9o.:�a/L/ hatess Location Comments ,, yr ; We the undersigned residents of Weld county after reviewing the application submitted by James M. McDonald, 5129 Weld County Road 16, Longmont, CO to amend Special Use Permit USR-537:85: 14 do hereby object to the granting of the proposed amendment. We also request the Weld County Commissioners take action regarding non compliance of the existing permit and ensure it be brought into compliance. I have reviewed the application Name Signature Date Address Location it U sL,-.c C/ _ Comments 40, I have reviewed the z;pplicatian :5Ltiz)/(-)5 (-4 i1/472 14c1 /aV,/,,2e Name Signature Date Q'ii / lid 2a U .-'a-Z1 m4 /moo Andress Location r/a--1-H—p , fos_cov Comments 9CG�L�JRtic C cf II�Gc P 2 2 / a-t-e at-41,-2 GiXeCcJ, ,t - atke gt J i •J L m'S`*"'n V.r.vL` ¢� ..�� We the undersigned residents of Weld county after reviewing the application submitted by James M. McDonald, 5129 Weld County Road 16, Longmont, CO to amend Special Use Per mit USR-537:85: 14 do hereby object to the granting of the proposed amendment. We also request the Weld County Commissioners take action regarding non compliance of the existing permit and ensure it be brought into compliance. I hove reviewed the application : •rjae/ k Tome... Name Signature Date s/or kick . /? Address Location Comments • I have reviewed the application : C Name ature Date 5�/OG c & ft /1 Address Location Comments We the undersigned residents of Weld County after reviewing the application submitted by James M_ McDonald, 5129 Weld County Road 16, Longmont, Co to amend Special Use Permit USR-537:85: 14 do hereby object to the granting of the proposed amendment_ We also request the Weld County Commissioners take action regarding non compliance of the existing permit and ensure it be brought into compliance_ rr i I have (Y, Ve. eci the .jpp icatiiln. I G L - de .Dam hi. � r� 4�L �/�/)�.9� . Nam ( / 1 Si nature Date I --// 5' 1u & 4,e ax /71.-177+i4°-"FA (' - ke2 '° '1 1 1 I i 3I ) 1 i nave reviewed the application: Nea a CY- liars,0 — 4e f'• 0 O/9-2, Name Signatire ' 1 intrkuitie &- erif_PI Address Lor;ation )2/ .4eL4,-&-- Z/144: -i.4 //Le 1 Z: ,meats PJI_ A.A.A11-4-CX--4‘-1--(-4, ,...,,,A.,a.3 t/? We the undersigned residents of Weld county after reviewing the application submitted by James M. McDonald, 5129 Weld County Road 16, Longmont, CO to amend Special Use Permit USR-537:85: 14 do hereby object to the granting of the proposed amendment. We also request the Weld County Commissioners take action regarding non compliance of the existing permit and ensure it be brought into compliance. I have reviewed the application • // Name Signature Date 670O a%2, aUn17V 4 r�2-tie e�pto �0 d1 .sec w Address / Location &SS p /Mat a-rattier" gt-e (;12.37 9 z) egatri YK,A;cie Comments • P ajtv1/46`47-4111 ette"-/ A-ertincerree444-ge Lae:4C firo-tat. --- tai I have reviewed the application : Name Signature gate 1•‘dress Lccaticn cr\M1� L { ot } Comments A* ( / y/ </ �;LrLj cc.�Gt-l-�.e)�,J le �.. `Y.<`'-c:.,.t...4 `,"LLE..N.�/ 1 i i_-- lIA.L=O . e ✓:.e u t' We the undersigned residents of Weld county after reviewing the application submitted by James M. McDonald, 5129 Weld County Road 16, Longmont, CO to amend Special Use Permit USR-537:85: 14 do hereby object to the granting of the proposed amendment. We also request the Weld County Commissioners take action regarding non compliance of the existing permit and ensure it be brought into compliance. I have reviewed the application : Name nature Date 63 �p 3 7 W e -� =r t ��,,�� - 'epee -7L— Address )c.fie 9 Location Comments p 1.217'r•- 2V /' Q`> AU gre-fit o , I have reviewed the application : S E"— 1//.O7 Name Signature Date -C13`) WE L. ° Co g.. 0 1(.0 3/y Address Location a I 1 C p . g0SD � Comments `` ,, � 0 new_ fl\c �"+&c.- /C`r!- Gt Lv — 1.i--c_ $rpd-�V LA-4-e___- 9 `_cv U 1. - e-C_i A r y )C..4 I- ry F_ �� 0 a ,� 6-a sQ > . r s-,.y,� x We the undersigned residents of Weld county after reviewing the application submitted by James M. McDonald, 5129 Weld County Road 16, Longmont, CO to amend Special Use Permit USR-537:85: 14 do hereby object to the granting of the proposed amendment. We also request the Weld County Commissioners take action regarding non compliance of the existing permit and ensure it be brought into compliance. I have reviewt I the application : Name SS nature Date 7CP- L./5,7,; Address /// Location C/ 7l %/j; ' l � J.n . c° ccV Comments ta. I have reviewed the application : -Name Signature Date 4/Pi i,—; -/ ), ST%b E/ 1K- 5-j y� ' Address Location 57/6 IL' . L17, /a /r $c-fc7 Comments • e rf:-Ant^r,,� We the undersigned residents of Weld county after reviewing the application submitted by James M. McDonald, 5129 Weld County Road 16, Longmont, CO to amend Special Use Permit USR-537:85: 14 do hereby object to the granting of the proposed amendment. We also request the Weld County Commissioners take action regarding non compliance of the existing permit and ensure it be brought into compliance. I have reviewed the application n1 —e,e-Au-cam 9/•2e702 Name Signature Date ��,ail El L. Cc,41,4 _ Address Location 67914 X-ZS 4o tr-me e �j, is G(� T cv'- 4(4 er Comments FfaC Gti (�: i 6c0/H4 Is DIRT ) s bad E-7.006p 4s ter- is . 7Nfkykr Off. /V£ta ll'k,•`f /purr 1 iaa su i)nL ant7t, c44?-m r SCcrr,N S.W . oc—rha- eA¢&C pwo Lt tT )gia-vt-- N7,x0`Sh 1✓oMimi rh0LOW caein a&v,pmeriT (IAA;n/ the- COM05 Cc'fltar AA, ov0ctTraPFIG . timit h AR en /31,20.4 31.O -1'hC Ailtforr ha 1t&c,ut-) JOvi25 41an5e 3'vwtic liver) I have reviewed the application : ft. cib i ..71/12(24e -B— 41/2/3-:,7 Name Signature Rafe (=/)?4y /h i. /2i-/xrrJf Address Location 6n9`1 r,25 /rO/fctq( Comments c)an f _fret) or nn2{ or e' /raffic; on ?-tie i ettr) new k) 0f Ar k0mc. rI 1,11 We the undersigned residents of Weld county after reviewing the application submitted by James M. McDonald, 5129 Weld County Road 16, Longmont, CO to amend Special Use Permit USR-537:85: 14 do hereby object to the granting of the proposed amendment. We also request the Weld County Commissioners take action regarding non compliance of the existing permit and ensure it be brought into compliance. I have reviewed t applicattU : -',4 6- 92 Name Signature Date 41 41 tell: ' e,2� � ,e�fr Address Location Comments taw I have reviewed the application : T vat✓ 1 l( ,'NSi14� V 5- 9 z Nerne Sj-vre-Are. re Date "a A44rtss Location Comments o nt-+-r7 We the undersigned residents of Weld county after reviewing the application submitted by James M. McDonald, 5129 Weld County Road 16, Longmont, CO to amend Special Use Permit USR-537:85: 14 do hereby object to the granting of the proposed amendment. We also request the Weld County Commissioners take action regarding non compliance of the existing permit and ensure it be brought into compliance. I have reviewed the application : diy-k2eli lot . rkkik Signature ate q1°) /6'(4f_ /7 A! Address Location Comments `✓ I haOAthJ reviewed the application : - 2dakthE (& 1/e I,cJahlerf v- 5--yz Wane Signature Date ?egg GOc 11 " nddrtss Location Comments ^5 a`^� rr V C S j 2 We the undersigned residents of Weld county after reviewing the application submitted by James M. McDonald, 5129 Weld County Road 16, Longmont, CO to amend Special Use Permit USR-537:85: 14 do hereby object to the granting of the proposed amendment. We also request the Weld County Commissioners take action regarding non compliance of the existing permit and ensure it be brought into compliance. I have reviewed the application : Name Signature Date 983' ZAGR 11 Address Location Comments • I have r viewed the eipplicatn : N n e Signature Date . 9l S 6()Ge // ▪ nadress Location Comments fn"^/%t-lso We the undersigned residents of Weld county after reviewing the application submitted by James M. McDonald, 5129 Weld County Road 16, Longmont, CO to amend Special Use Permit USR-537:85: 14 do hereby object to the granting of the proposed amendment. We also request the Weld County Commissioners take action regarding non compliance of the existing permit and ensure it be brought into compliance. I have reviewed the application : CV11,s4int ,up /s'` NLrv.�*)k: / G'-2 Name Signature Date Li C. k . 1 ) A\jor*k . Address Location Comments • t. I have/ � reviewed the application : ICI( - fr:t �id(),Stn/-- 1/4-1(01- 4/(Ei2 "mil Name Sure Date e.�`-S43 t3Cil /7 2 n x{c�-/(aY; " rolitess Legation Comments • Cf.::: `..' "7 We the undersigned residents of Weld county after reviewing the application submitted by James M. McDonald, 5129 Weld County Road 16, Longmont, CO to amend Special Use Permit USR-537:85: 14 do hereby object to the granting of the proposed amendment. We also request the Weld County Commissioners take action regarding non compliance of the existing permit and ensure it be brought into compliance. I have reviewed the application : 4/-5--11____- me Signature Date Address Location 617 6 wG N 6114,,»� e, k, - Comments tl I have reviewed w the application : __ itimi 6)Nam ignature Dat C� 114V �� - -t - 9/59 Address Location Comments • e cr.)grin We the undersigned residents of Weld county after reviewing the application submitted by James M. McDonald, 5129 Weld County Road 16, Longmont, CO to amend Special Use Permit USR-537:85: 14 do hereby object to the granting of the proposed amendment. We also request the Weld County Commissioners take action regarding non compliance of the existing permit and ensure it be brought into compliance. I have reviewed the application Name Signature Date gddres Location 9ST/ /2 i> Crfer Comments 4v I have reviewed the application : vae( w 41( ercv As-- Name Signature ate �3 3e7 V e—, // nddrtss Location Comments / /c�W / - • 4NaV f� 2 � u p 1 yr 4 run t-054 / 054 - --17.0E) a� . We the undersigned residents of Weld county after reviewing the application submitted by James M. McDonald, 5129 Weld County Road 16, Longmont, CO to amend Special Use Permit USR-537:85: 14 do hereby object to the granting of the proposed amendment. We also request the Weld County Commissioners take action regarding noncompliance of the existing permit and ensure it be brought into compliance. I have reviewed the application (Jo 372 (7 ,674:0)-L Name Signature ate gpG�eQ 514- V ✓ , ' /13 h4i-mu "",Location �'7 Comments two I have reviewed the application : t2i ,4 7 0itt Name Signature Date t y Z,xi s 7 a3), // 2 0A)171/ONC hddrtss Lvcitivn Comments We the undersigned residents of Weld county after reviewing the application submitted by James M. McDonald, 5129 Weld County Road 16, Longmont, CO to amend Special Use Permit USR-537:85: 14 do hereby object to the granting of the proposed amendment. We also request the Weld County Commissioners take action regarding non compliance of the existing permit and ensure it be brought into compliance. I have reviewed the application : /Yw s1/4/.4 (a) e)6 D /a s Ce�z, Name Signature Date 50: 3 CUG.L� "7/ X-71-7776-,j , CO �s� V Address Location Comments iw I have reviewed the application : Opa-tr-C- Doe& 7:72 t7t_p_a 4/AA 2_ — Name Signet-ire Date rictus Location Comments • cntrrs,9 We the undersigned residents of Weld County after reviewing the application submitted by James M. McDonald, 51 29 Weld County Road 16, Longmont, Co to amend Special Use Permit U R-537:85: 14 do hereby object to the granting of the proposed amendment. We also request the Weld County Commissioners take action regarding non compliance of the existing permit and ensure it be brought into compliance- [ n-vii. th, application: Ck -L v\-r-k iv\ tcLa z-/-6-Tz crtature Date 7�0l (A)-c Z 11 Lc, woo CC/Cir. ,51-0 c✓eS4 Location { t appi. t1orL 1`i CQ •N an-le �=tn_� !`7" J C C`fZ I 6icy\ rv,61A-t- Cip SUDr t o c:k Location�_,26-‘ t_ ti C Ar\r1 vrt COQ, p L.) \(\c,)� �.I.J •I 1.0 We the undersigned residents of Weld County after reviewing the application submitted by James M. McDonald, 5 129 Weld County Road 16, Longmont, Co to amend Special Use Permit USR-537.85: 14 do hereby object to the granting of the proposed amendment. We also request the Weld County Commissioners take action regarding non compliance of the existing permit and ensure it be brought into compliance_ ria*ve re'view'ed the appiic3tiiin: /11 rn j, 1r, yra ,' t A lfature Date //•� 76 „fi / 4/1' e(2(//y /c," Address Location c0 1)9 S/2.71 ele 6295a l::or;;erc#_ have re:iie'w ed the • pplication: Name Sigma/Our.? Date 701 01 Sri& Lq //1/y . / �/ Address / Location 0);)i ) dO .d9-A11/ Cements O6.•. r We the undersigned residents of Weld County after reviewing the application submitted by James M. McDonald, 5129 Weld County Road i b, Longmont, Co to amend Special Use Permit USR-537:85: 14 do hereby object to the granting of the proposed amendment_ We also request the Weld County Commissioners take action regarding non compliance of the existing permit and ensure it be brought into compliance. t I have re*ii ;•red the application:: /�/'. I ctIl i (� / a �', +� 1 r sa- a- _ aR: — .---,.„ k;--,-�--, ��3rs ie Signature!� Date 1 r ,; h� �/ Yck; A//7 , ddre L.,.:.,t..i+arr, 1_ -\- /017/7 //92111 j e 1 204- � c.,-,,,,,,,, 1 i 1 1 1 1 have reviewed the application: ,/---? 7e c ' d ',(9k1 r. + J'=. :fi •Y rat_ a��rri!' /670 � �any.� _ 66), (AjiCe 11 1/ Lon 'lon CO. g°5QY nddre�� 9 Location r_arrrent_ i ST"."1"..:'79 We the undersigned residents of Weld county after reviewing the application submitted by James M. McDonald, 5129 Weld County Road 16, Longmont, CO to amend Special Use Permit USR-537:85: 14 do hereby object to the granting of the proposed amendment. We also request the Weld County Commissioners take action regarding non compliance of the existing permit and ensure it be brought into compliance. I have reviewed the application : 141Ad 2/It ( crSc Name L� Oise ignature 1 !^7 2 Date sr-13 / K , �� ` Location 0-56 Comments / rrilaMiVn ` . frd £4 tw I have reviewed the application : Ed *if" /d ('. roc+ e Q = pt V-51 Name Signature Date Co L 1,7 ‘?-- " Marts: Location comments We the undersigned residents of Weld county after reviewing the application submitted by James M. McDonald, 5129 Weld County Road 16, Longmont, CO to amend Special Use Permit USR-537:85: 14 do hereby object to the granting of the proposed amendment. We also request the Weld County Commissioners take action regarding non compliance of the existing permit and ensure it be brought into compliance. I have reviewed the application : Name Signature _ Date ck" 3-3 Address Location S3 3 (a TO. C ,A R _ LS' cm, ,.,.,z,., Commeentss� °°�� J i— ce-- _ I have reviewed he application! : / - 1 71 MI /1( 6.),--2,--,,—"----------- Name Signature Date ' itatA loo • ' micirtss i LoCstion Co L. * ih..y1 ( u1 .6 c 0g Comments J r_i 14-4 f 11472"111_ CI 411/19i P 'IVo tiles M24 [ (1,r OE ��y"646:7 5- 0 irrr 9 We the undersigned residents of Weld county after reviewing the application submitted by James M. McDonald, 5129 Weld County Road 16, Longmont, CO to amend Special Use Permit USR-537:85: 14 do hereby object to the granting of the proposed amendment. We also request the Weld County Commissioners take action regarding non compliance of the existing permit and ensure it be brought into compliance. I have reviewed the application : /1/4/4"d"9- Name Signature Date 5:757 / .e /Y. / 7 Address Location (AM")•iM") i Cif io/C-rz_i Jo 14.2 Fly i vy 19.1.4.1"-mss ui Comments 2- 89.eiC P1 'R/ Lido 6d tg- o42...e ifltifr.c erne EA G , ,a c✓ c4y2-7 f--3'A/Q Ev I have reviewed the application : Z albe;.z ,n eZGG,/;�6t.-% C j J'S. 9a, Name Signature Date _53,5 7 Gt,'".ern Co 1 / ' Address Location .J'2 K ,t-ra) �Jll✓/G'4_, Lc.( Zazi Comments criiittn-on We the undersigned residents of Weld county after reviewing the application submitted by James M. McDonald, 5129 Weld County Road 16, Longmont, CO to amend Special Use Permit USR-537:85: 14 do hereby object to the granting of the proposed amendment. We also request the Weld County Commissioners take action regarding non compliance of the existing permit and ensure it be brought into compliance. I have reviewed the application :107117)-(pri /772/M. f'` Name Signature Date Address r Location ma /./. �2 r 7� i cce_ Ct nd --t1-12 //1 )(, Comments i _ S (� �r, En IOW LA J An .' fin rP.S Efte ikth co I have reviewed the application : 614,3 g. fiemu 2 lc /4e s-Name ilSnature Date Address Leeetion Comments to Lt- c / ere f c 72)4) w1 c,,4 4 6 /6 Q We the undersigned residents of Weld county after reviewing the application submitted by James M. McDonald, 5129 Weld County Road 16, Longmont, CO to amend Special Use Permit USR-537:85: 14 do hereby object to the granting of the proposed amendment. We also request the Weld County Commissioners take action regarding non compliance of the existing permit and ensure it be brought into compliance. I have reviewed the application J-trU fr ITDRe 4soti /? .na, Date _IC()Name Signature // ate _I 4 are OCR_ LS, (. nrur. c, ;v (�rs 0 C �( Address �// Location /hies i3-C.C/? keY)00_ / Jl2O eLA-�-CatAiO�J1 LPi-to Rit -Q IVY) Comments /, ,� n'bn s on r� -L F.Cirk e.i O-ct, -,�ySPC ?LLI4 Mang (t kell m f�„ n 1/n d> .T,o ,tki?CJ cPCr1 Oyu I have reviewed the application : s' cry ALA,, �- 1� ��-�� Name Signature Date S c. LcN6.Mvivr c R o $Address c ( Levities Comm entb .k'�� ;_� BAs -_ 2 ,„Aix .... r5-h-,ti.! , i-3ss._ 7:47 A. A. 7WYza,w,�o-11"—) .2 <sN-�u� '1-ja?'N. . &tri _i Ca:.ti'S• moo_ '^-'1.L. -G (ntr:,nt..li2 We the undersigned residents of Weld County after We L the undersigned t V ! reviewing the application submitted by James M. McDonald, 5129 Weld County Road 16, Longmont, Co to amend Special Use Permit USR-537:85: 14 do hereby object to the granting of the proposed amendment_ We also request the Weld County Commissioners take action regarding non compliance of the existing permit and ensure it be brought into compliance_ I 1 ha-..,e rev1€:ved the application: Ia ,Aliiii, 1—- ' —7c2 )1 /e ,______44:. Slid Iatu date 1 J/ 7,1 /.1)& de 41,61 01 7 eit /2 F / Location 1 1 I I I i ha-•ie reviewed the application: eAPLC fide,- g-- --,7 Name Signa -e Date S'53/' 4/l ei,E. 11-,22 , t,o 1�eni ea, 3O5-424/ ,i.,/,. C; Addr e Location ._crr€.nt_ a....... .,a.$ , e We the undersigned residents of Weld County after reviewing the application submitted by James M_ McDonald, 51 29 Weld County Road 16, Longmont, Co to amend Special Use Permit USR-537:85: 14 do hereby object to the granting of the proposed amendment. We also request the Weld County Commissioners take action regarding non compliance of the existing permit and ensure it be brought into compliance_ s na,..e re.-r iewed the application 4\/\--v .----\...)._:yv i,„____ __ nkvx_ LA..; 0. ,f.... y•-• - Z.__ N..rr u' Signature Date /1(-) .-.. Pei r )tt i-60 J.e.e -4-c.) Address Location L ori ent_ 1 have re-vie-wed the application 1.)IA-10 5-e,R n i 4: r;lr---c---i /‘:.2-e-i A -2 2, -- 4 - 7..v.._.... Nam nature ir Date /d y� CI v ter' ,e,--x-1.--2-2-6---0 �a ' CC. �s , at o �/ Address / Location I_'Srnent= We the undersigned residents of Weld county after reviewing the application tubmitted by James M. McDonald, 5129 Weld County Road 16, Longmont, CO to amend Special Use Permit USR-537:85: 14 do hereby object to the granting of the proposed amendment. We also request the Weld County Commissioners take action regarding non compliance of the existing permit and ensure it be brought into compliance. I have reviewed the application : - Name Signature �' SIP/ / 20X 6 ,4,u6))22-,0-7-- Address Location / I j i _ Com is / v z' L - teo I have reviewed the application : Name Signature Date h hddres; Location Comments • ert"ry7 We the undersigned residents of Weld county after reviewing the application submitted by James M. McDonald, 5129 Weld County Road 16, Longmont, CO to amend Special Use Permit USR-537:85: 14 do hereby object to the granting of the proposed amendment. We also request the Weld County Commissioners take action regarding non compliance of the existing permit and ensure it be brought into compliance. I have reviewed the application : To An Cv Zacie/ kiC% i0. 5//92 _ Name nature Date 903/ ltdie /d ( c< n.. /y fed / 3 Address Location Comments • tap I have reviewed the application : Name Signature Date nddress Location Comments We the undersigned residents of Weld County after reviewing the application submitted by James M_ McDonald, 5129 Weld County Road 16, Longmont, Co to amend Special Use Permit USR--537:85. 14 do hereby object to the granting of the proposed amendment. We also request the Weld County Commissioners take action regarding non compliance of the existing permit and ensure it be brought into compliance_ have r evle'ofed th,? application: Y4114-••Ci B<<z Name /1„2..)2--. ignature Date l�•3ri!e Y/0,2 J , ; // 7e,t,10,,..tLat U Cel Address Location CO ,erli. I IS A Gem / 7, L_ A Sj,1,v 1/ i N df / 1�ci /. lw 7a �c,--- ALL A • P. Ac /, U;FL- pJ .7I I have re-viewed tree application: I '0.-JZ 4c-c,)ci fs )-7 X2 R-c-: e_`L ______ _,CZkL_I--ac3e, Q /--7-1, ., an-7e Signature Date '/ tea wLd. i / Address Location 16 h a ,.A- C . . g4 --., y 0merlt.r/ • 4_0,.,:.114 ,. ,i We the undersigned residents of Weld County after reviewing the application submitted by James 11. McDonald, 5129 Weld County Road 16, Longmont, Co to amend Special Use Permit USR-537:85: 14 do hereby object to the granting of the proposed amendment_ We also request the Weld County Commissioners take action regarding non compliance of the existing permit and ensure it be brought into compliance_ I have re'vte\yea the : Name i• :atI a 03 _ .„ , •, Address Location yi 6 .3 a c e y 15 t. PA( q (ol crift Lir h if y -7 fi e lit.5 A_141 MA-Tim c rc/cC; t/i' ,45 (jOtd r eve "01P r , reviewed the application: (I,hQr , Gnr7JaV,-0 OAP-(..L; L\1 11(7-A5. Ir'! me Signature Gate 1-7L-/ _ LcE / / HPberlvkAjeA q Address I r-+rner:ts t,c .Laile 'fuo \bztip nvar oacz ra,c h,., Ere, 10 O. 41.11)0A/nel • C'eaftei, oRk.,1 itefryiloc 6W 0 , 11 We the undersigned residents of Weld county after reviewing the application submitted by James M. McDonald, 5129 Weld County Road 16, Longmont, CO to amend Special Use Permit USR-537:85: 14 do hereby object to the granting of the proposed amendment. We also request the Weld County Commissioners take action regarding non compliance of the existing permit and ensure it be brought into compliance. I have reviewed the application : Q - - -� 'SAS ` ° Date Name Sig ure 1790Q &pet ° / ( Address Location Comments • _� Lt - ( k �5 K - °rrec ba I have reviewed the application : - ` - / Name Signature Date 2(" // ry 3 • w Addrt€s Location Comments We the undersigned residents of Weld county after reviewing the application submitted by James M. McDonald, 5129 Weld County Road 16, Longmont, CO to amend Special Use Permit USR-537:85: 14 do hereby object to the granting of the proposed amendment. We also request the Weld County Commissioners take action regarding non compliance of the existing permit and ensure it be brought into compliance. I have reviewed the application Rau I Cie.kJ03el QG,.Pi £ ,Sucre 9/ S/9t Name Signature Date i S, Gfi Address Location Comments 6fr I have reviewed the application : /e2/0 &>A /aye/ .1t ,e. Wanes/N. Signature Date 6 - ?s-,1:-( itc - J�-L_ I:4 - �1 5 t� et dons-/G rc) A LVCt4 ddrtss rJ Comments C , We the undersigned residents of Weld county after reviewing the application submitted by James M. McDonald, 5129 Weld County Road 16, Longmont, CO to amend Special Use Permit USR-537:85: 14 do hereby object to the granting of the proposed amendment. We also request the Weld County Commissioners take action regarding non compliance of the existing permit and ensure it be brought into compliance. • I have reviewed the application : /3;7 ( /Emile-ro j.3 %L, ,,— L/ S 92 Name Signature Date S J P S We/I CO, t/ / 34✓ /tAi•c h Orc rvlQ w Address Location Comments tem I have reviewed the application : ✓ (l/ - ,046 „1„71/2-,,=U� r,,'- i„-_, ,,,,2_, — Name / Signatu Date \g-. O/ 1iiO,e y7-- /--e ( crcy ' A4/�4�SLL1t4 rass Alida n t ' Location /4.44,04, 7ritlitkriA 0?C‘ die 4.41,9 _..aelli 0:42-"Ane4,Agin4,14,147, r . _tiznate?!. ..it 7. ,&( ,a,e-tx abtt 4dized DitfrAteht. a o it . 17.E L d �f.�i 60-7(-Q< A4fr J-N 7 7)20 x_)_0.4. /a f.✓✓.� ao - , I..-r,t-•-",-, We the undersigned residents of Weld county after reviewing the application submitted by James M. McDonald, 5129 Weld County Road 16, Longmont, CO to amend Special Use Permit USR-537:85: 14 do hereby object to the granting of the proposed amendment. We also request the Weld County Commissioners take action regarding non compliance of the existing permit and ensure it be brought into compliance. I have reviewed the application Donna 00 /L); (\, Name Signa ure Date y9 C)7 c )c _ /g 1 c1- ( Sig.coy Address Location Comments I have reviewed the application : 1) (Fpnie. /77(4j��ii'i ) f : G J Name Signature Date elf Sanas Location �c/Y,i (� 0 �n �S-O Comin'fnts • (+cent x-w,1 We the undersigned residents of Weld county after reviewing the application submitted by James M. McDonald, 5129 Weld County Road 16, Longmont, CO to amend Special Use Permit USR-537:85: 14 do hereby object to the granting of the proposed amendment. We also request the Weld County Commissioners take action regarding non compliance of the existing permit and ensure it be brought into compliance. I have reviewed the application : Name ( Signature Date I 64✓ � �t�11 G`" /V, ��(?//17 Address / Location Comments fo+ I have reviewed the application : 4 fl Name Signature Date ntldrt€€ Location Comments e,r-r.,,t�rrn We the undersigned residents of Weld county after reviewing the application submitted by James M. McDonald, 5129 Weld County Road 16, Longmont, CO to amend Special Use Permit USR-537:85: 14 do hereby object to the granting of the proposed amendment. We also request the Weld County Commissioners take action regarding non compliance of the existing permit and ensure it be brought into compliance. I have reviewed the application : , Name St at a Date Address Location Comments tip I have reviewed the application : u 5 t t_ Y — 2 Name g atur Date ,, G vnf C /� I 8 Li 11_4,1_4- G L . 5 d 5 Fto 1— har8 n Location Comments C lnI; r7 ,:.a : We the undersigned residents of Weld county after reviewing the application submitted by James M. McDonald, 5129 Weld County Road 16, Longmont, CO to amend Special Use Permit USR-537:85: 14 do hereby object to the granting of the proposed amendment. We also request the Weld County Commissioners take action regarding non compliance of the existing permit and ensure it be brought into compliance. I have reviewed the application � . . 7 t/97a- Name Signature Date // 7Ir/ , o % - Address Location fit 7! rd, c)- r/e/ 4Q. 6-s—/6 Comments e.e X33-419 .5 I have reviewed the application : Name Signature Date 33/7 34 life'.,` nddrtss I Location Comments a.r..c i We the undersigned residents of Weld county after reviewing the application submitted by James M. McDonald, 5129 Weld County Road 16, Longmont, CO to amend Special Use Permit USR-537:85: 14 do hereby object to the granting of the proposed amendment. We also request the Weld County Commissioners take action regarding non compliance of the existing permit and ensure it be brought into compliance. I have reviewed the application : ki Name Signature Date 2 A 2 , c' C <C ' Y Address Location y(:-�Lc ,y2,-- Ji —c? '''c:'''c: S c c/omments to I have reviewed the application : J Name Signature Date J nddrt Location Cominents� We the undersigned residents of Weld county after reviewing the application submitted by James M. McDonald, 5129 Weld County Road 16, Longmont, CO to amend Special Use Permit USR-537:85: 14 do hereby object to the granting of the proposed amendment. We also request the Weld County Commissioners take action regarding non compliance of the existing permit and ensure it be brought into compliance. I have reviewed the application : Name / C / Signature / Date ��G9 // �(' / D �C ifr,..-ter .,.o... .,.� �i p C cry Address Location Comments tee I have reviewed the application Patc/cleacz-, 4,/e,r7 l 7� � E V/S Name Signature j/ Date / ti ur � r`/ X � - 22- L i1..,� � . a( v 5' rictus Location Comments We the undersigned residents of Weld county after reviewing the application submitted by James M. McDonald, 5129 Weld County Road 16, Longmont, CO to amend Special Use Permit USR-537:85: 14 do hereby object to the granting of the proposed amendment. We also request the Weld County Commissioners take action regarding non compliance of the existing permit and ensure it be brought into compliance. I have reviewed the application : /� � — ._ ✓-1 N' e s /. L.�n 4er✓r/ V .' LLLWL�'�l L. �- tAdt" /�i✓ �� i2 Name Signature Date r � , 9j3 . 1 •"C l > c<. >� 6 < wr;.K .. � 1-c \(/. Address Location :> Comments `�.. £ DoT- Cl7 SG i/1 e. *ex S7/5 tittne-e- oZ 1C. fill'? '�p21: C. b 9iZ ✓�' tQ c 640.1e_ ekpiiviS/eni. i/n ki�nUsauva // ‘',+ /fass1117 i U b I have reviewed theapplication : earn I�J u� �u 4 L�J 4s k ra-cif- 2e :a-�iLc%?�C Nanie / Signature Date R5 1 a5 2e 'e c;frciefrernizi< ') c obs"o mew Location K /r Comments (*crr r`"",- We the undersigned residents of Weld county after reviewing the application submitted by James M. McDonald, 5129 Weld County Road 16, Longmont, CO to amend Special Use Permit USR-537:85: 14 do hereby object to the granting of the proposed amendment. We also request the Weld County Commissioners take action regarding non compliance of the existing permit and ensure it be brought into compliance. I have reviewed the application Name tgnature Date )l) ',/ /1) , 'A') i / 7! 7 Address Location / `� t'/ t kJ( 6,/,(( 1 / � C t1-Y 1 ) i .'�-C�7;; ._ Comments I have reviewed the application : vz c_C ` Lrc - t je Name S at Date /� ��_ Addressation /JJ Comments AFFIDAVIT STATE OF WISCONSIN ) SS. JEFFERSON COUNTY ) To Whom It May Concern: We, the signers below, are owners of the following-described real estate in Weld County, Colorado: W 1/2 of the E 1/2 of the SW 1/4 of Section 25 , Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. , subject to a 40 foot road easement on the North, and a 30 foot road easement on the West, the above being 40 acres more or less. Since we reside in Wisconsin, we hereby authorize Bennett and Geraldine Russell to act as our representatives in Colorado with regard to the oversight of our real estate located there and described above. By this document, Bennett and Geraldine Russell are authorized to report to the proper authorities any of the following: tresspass on our property, adverse possession of our property, physical encumbrances observable on the property, as well as acts of God or man which have a negative and destructive effect on the real estate. Specific exception to these reportable acts and circumstances is activity necessitated to maintain the 2 oil wells which exist on the land at this time. All other tresspass is considered a violation of the owner' s rights and we hereby request that, as such, tresspassors be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. � Dated: /S /f9/ "6I2 41 --a Ronald//•//G. Gaulke Dated: 9s1 v /f/ /99/ l�c K therinerine M.. G Gaulke 27 9712ALIA-Ci Subscribed and sworn to before me this S`1" delay /9//f�'July, 1991 .DitzNo a y Public, State of Wisconsin. My commission: ';‘.4t.,,,,,.- 3 JI II q3 D ir` nt name-) .s . M a,�.e &&aJ Li/kJ kc ck v`s u- , , on- - �Np rn c Ki d S . °� @QraLb to Moyne. L�-L)Ju w tip ci9� 15waR l � as.4.. We the undersigned residents of Weld County after reviewing the application submitted by James M. McDonald, 5129 Weld County Road 16, Longmont, Co to amend Special Use Permit USR-537:85: 14 do hereby object to the granting of the proposed amendment_ We also request the Weld County Commissioners take action regarding non compliance of the existing permit and ensure it be brought into compliance- s ti.3-,e reviewed the application: to,ig, IE. pi ,' Ph c.z-y: (_Gad'i k c4,:,-41, _, %/a., , /be-, Nar:r Signature,/ Date I 74—S ��(O1 /c/ O-e9&/y A/ 1 1/ eoldress Location I A o� /11(9/21, ��(9/a , 1 3�� Cornent_� i I I i have reviewed the application: : N.3rne Signature Late Address Location [-- Coments I- i i i C"',n ir-1....� V. u .J,fir We the undersigned residents of Weld county after reviewing the application submitted by James M. McDonald, 5129 Weld County Road 16, Longmont, CO to amend Special Use Permit USR-537:85: 14 do hereby object to the granting of the proposed amendment. We also request the Weld County Commissioners take action regarding non compliance of the existing permit and ensure it be brought into compliance. I have reviewed the application : NO A St st k AA.Q G la c —� 4((4CI Name Signature Date " A-c b LJDcz 1� c i v\ '.�.4�� l� LSD r\c ,.c,n 1 '00YJ� Address Location Comments Ss2R r CAnc ( aQ-ccur o, I have reviewed the application : Name Signature Date Address Location Comments • FJ.s vV We the undersigned residents of Weld County after reviewing the application submitted by James M. McDonald, 5129 Weld County Road 16, Longmont, Co to amend Special Use Permit USR-537.85. 14 do hereby object to the granting of the proposed amendment_ We also request the Weld County Commissioners take action regarding non compliance of the existing permit and ensure it be brought into compliance. 1 iiaYe revie,,y'enj the application: ke,,n Ale 4/, 16,,.� tf- G- �a • Name c/ Sigri.ytur. — Date �`�� vc co c�oSo y Address ( Location T-•/' 44e_ c/e�r it cam.y, /�r w c ur r er r< P et.Y. ! ��c re pen t r ho 44_141 /1.0. he et..n e ,i cite� f have reviewed the application: i/e ferie /i(ei4 - 0,14-Q ,-/. . 0- ‘'t 7/:: ^i::r,-,e / Signature Date 9 r(- 1/l/('ise Z I-. 4r e, )( Ca V d SDI Addre__ / Lc :.ition I orrier,ts I We the undersigned residents of Weld County after reviewing the application submitted by James M_ McDonald, 5129 Weld County Road 16, Longmont, Co to amend Special Use Permit USR-537:85: 14 do hereby object to the granting of the proposed amendment_ We also request the Weld County Commissioners take action regarding non compliance of the existing permit and ensure it be brought into compliance_ have reviewed Nij the application: n 6-) 1 ET(fA(S v -1113t7t1 !lame :tih]nature Date -14 c.- r\ i'Mrte On eff)CA-- Address Location atian yI 7:0—k OJ4 c'Pc)`sed ---he w.t end (ipp ,l CCU cn no i I:iJri7Yrl+ ` J `�r. f- kbLi�c\ .Thm n �e c -t p 11 E'6 I duet\ ( r 1c1P6 i i tia V e_ reviewed the application: DO‘kKe-- �tc�t - e. ke (Ca Name Date -7 SO -1 V&, act gao zi �yy f Addrers Location C1.r1 -o ff etolIeN Le ck AcTLicAk ‘or\ T'a R C_crl;ents O0-\ r1c '(\. ALA We the undersigned residents of Weld county after reviewing the application submitted by James M. McDonald, 5129 Weld County Road 16, Longmont, CO to amend Special Use Permit USR-537:85: 14 do hereby object to the granting of the proposed amendment. We also request the Weld County Commissioners take action regarding non compliance of the existing permit and ensure it be brought into compliance. I have reviewed the application : Name Signature / / ate 5373 77CR /6 Address Location Comments °/r 4 ot1t s, tip I have reviewed the application :"93A-CcalName Signature Date X373 toc. 244 —4113 mdQress Location Comments —9.i J i 5 7- :17:0;1279;127 We the undersigned residents of Weld county after reviewing the application submitted by James M. McDonald, 5129 Weld County Road 16, Longmont, CO to amend Special Use Permit USR-537:85: 14 do hereby object to the granting of the proposed amendment. We also request the Weld County Commissioners take action regarding non compliance of the existing permit and ensure it be brought into compliance. I have reviewed the application :/ � � LLt �tt(r,t • ctmtiZ�k C I Name Signat i a Date 7-65%2 kFLD (1Cu,u/Y /rib 1/ levy(MOLT Cc ge)s e 171 so At 71e /al'. l'eEr Address —yLocation //24 t / 1'�S jrw4k'ck O ./1/1_24 f2' CL.4-n-e-n-Vri4tel CZ A./it/lalt f 9K d Comments J ` , -T�/ /� /� /� / C C�� Lj C;a�cc c_-_ G� r �u P . T �Ats32. 4J tyntm t_e_c ca c_ lc t'Cc f have reviewed the application : L5sELL C. .)ltt5EA- U, LLE - JT. Qlclt�v2ti✓ z 6- — Name Signature /f Date 759.) /'[Lb cc, uN ry /] 1! 7cA.67, ZCn % ('c gc so „1.-5 e FT /e ell in-Ax) Aadrtss Location ny 62( Co(/mmeen'ttsss �d to . iE-)-c. -4;er-1 Cl'J7-'f y {1;2 mil-Yt /y,1^f� l?;;- /2, ��/2r_LrC c c`'--c-_,ta?c/J9!-Q a iJ e fr? •w .a3 + itaiSIT { .. CASE SUMMARY g}■! ZCH #74 DATE: June 19, 1991 VIOLATION NUMBER: ZCH #74 NAME: James McDonald Adrenalin Adventures 4911 Garrison, #103 Attention: Doug Hase Wheatridge, CO 80033 831 1/2 19th Street Boulder, CO 80302 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the E2 W2 SW4 of Section 25, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. CASE SUMMARY March 29, 1991 Called Adrenalin Adventures about possible zoning violation requested and additional information on the proposed uses. April 1, 1991 Received a letter dated March 30, 1991 from Chirstine V. Warren, Adrenalin Adventures. April 2, 1991 Staff informed Christine V. Warren that the proposed uses would be a material deviation to the approved plans and would require an Amended Special Review permit. Prior to the activity being conducted on the property. April 3, 1991 The Special Review permit application was reviewed with Christine V. Warren. April 4, 1991 The Tribune ran a front page story about the bungee jumping conducted April 4, 1991 on the Special Review permit site. April 5, 1991 Violation letter issued. May 17, 1991 A property owner in the area indicated the bungee jumping activity is still being conducted on the subject property. May 20, 1991 A certified letter was sent to property owner and operator indicating that the probable cause hearing was scheduled. I f d ir (', DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICE: !' PHONE(303)356-0000,EXT.440 915 10th STREW 71 1.1k 11 ^ ern GREELEY,COLORADO 8063 COLORADO April 5 , 1991 James M. McDonald 11940 W. Independence Golden, CO 80401 Subject: ZCH-74 Dear Mr. McDonald: The present uses of your property (hot air balloon bungee jumping) are not in compliance with Development Standards placed on your property at the time USR-537 was approved by the Board of County Commissioners (violations of Operation Standards #1, 17 , and 21) . A copy of these items from the approved resolution are enclosed. The Use by Special Review area must be brought into compliance with the Conditions of Approval and the Development Standards within 30 days from the date of this letter. Noncompliance will result in our office scheduling a Probable Cause Hearing before the Board of County Commissioners. If the Board determines there is sufficient probable cause to warrant further action, a Show Cause Hearing will be scheduled to consider revocation of the Use by Special Review permit. . If you have information that may clear up this matter, please call or write . Sincerely, ,�, t₹eSchuett Current Planner pc Adrenalin Adventures Attention: Doug Ease 831 1/2 19th Street Boulder, CO 80302 enclosures KITTS-ROMAINE 3 ST26380 P. 01 KITTS ROMAINE FOR IWIE0LATE ETLEASE CONTACT: SEISEY REVIOUS October 10,1.951 (303)'.'572-8575 COLORADO MANS 2,400' FALL WILL BREAK THE WORLD 'RECORD. BOULDER, OD - Boulder adventurer Doug Base (Hat-zee) will once again attempt to break the world record bungee cord jump by free-falling 2,400 feet from a hot- air balloon. The standing record of 1,000'feet, set in February, 1991 by a California team, was reported to have been broken by the same group, with an unconfirmed jump of 2,000 feet, in September, 1991. Base, 23, had attempted to break the record last month, but was forced to abort the balloon jump due to adverse wind conditions. The jump will take place at sunrise Monday October 14, north-east of Denver. Media wi4bing to attend the world record breaking attempt should phone (303)572-6575 for a recorded message confirming the time and date of the jump. While scheduled for Monday morning, adverse wind or other weather conditions may necessitate a. post- ponement. Confirmation will be recorded by 4 a.m. To reach the drop site, travel I-25 north from Denver to Ett 235. Travel rient on Highway 52 for one stile to Road 11. Travel left one mile to Road 16. Travel right 100 yards to site on left side of road. *5129 Weld County Road, Route 16 Yes, this is the same location as the last attempt! # # THE KITTS-ROMAINE AGENCIES,INC. Marketing•Communications ALBUQUERQUE,SANTA FE•DENVER•PHOENIX•SALT LAKE CITY P.O. Box t0U2i4, Ucnvcr,CL)8,02X1 • 12u0 17th Street,Suite 2330, Denver,CO 80202 • (303)572-6575 • Fax(303)572-6580 dry ,RM a CYNrt, "g.g2 n c ;,,. x r, ...-4 D CD t7'G r. CP .C N ° CD w . 5 r-... C S d.0.ry 0`G O . .c CD r"t 0°CI le; it.o�..^ov a E.m ocr,- a m gE0° v^. mmr' . 8 ,PDD° 9: z etc Q'C«Q 1 :'t n Er.„,--o co d.N 4 d S ri tzt tt.„ -4 m`'we n m ` O 2 ro wad • ww� NO. ,I,.. . Nm2D .0..‘, «• 0.- �■ ° §.....b2 tT iY"fD O °0 C I p . ..1 } y Pt fp m t4 w ; p ' 8 W "."B• 0 ef a.m roc —Vrmay °..m _ N''' . Ina E . w w _2, t r isi po woo !...,HK • � c � tm ., n . yry«pm� ��--rr c.rrpp 5 fitii: ,s .IlleOui• t 20.112't .• alb 0 7 �5'5'm or rip g'. Q .: h) 8.m m I at :, Q A2SwE Q- ,os M ' 0.w_ .0.,,,,,- ■ • anw;�Dm 4t»mm5'o ° a.m ccw �� #,I}} � 'u�. : e., i { ,,....� i Cf. N rn c'• • g �G b ' --. O .4F:2 w r. r C tt ICD mi ma , z:.w N o'te ox° rel0 ,. mO <^r• -!r eft• �3 ti «' 5.w si mm 5.E ^w F.0 [] ti o 5 °+✓ , G,. N'.0' .fir E y w A E N M A Q< grin N "•t rii • 2,-, ,z,, '„ o 2 �, tiro w .» = m , o^w , n a st... ;G•A -o. _w g » O•b 31 p o ag .�2. w w .w. p...... r,, w w N G..., ==n trig o P. M milOD a .'L N C ^. p.,. =,,,. N 5.2 ?. N 3 a5' E. 0,mD.5° ' w .owa°omw: o t c r -a+ r9 o .'a030 ^'. 03 w5'nrD^ tea .. ' td " glornDc° :=;.w. ow. o4o�� .o, wo'o 3 X G.N N crow sr.=- cm 0.»N.-. ra m m frSO O .. a co =cotito a Op,.,0.mwarire'•sue«, 7 a i 'a,P 0 •4.9.oi33 m 5 o ..:,o o'•' �H mde' wmac:.O. , Z A p, 2.0 inmrDw'a m 0.. .:rot att. , E � o.° '.w. Ev'Py' �v 5•Qrp o .r�'., ..Do e ! nrrr ° ogf° egggxtE.'w '-rN �Fi ..5:Ew ei . '6 1 •-•Las d . .°a..CX�'m m'�d0p,n N'wi.�� o'O.1~P am dY �� n :', PL0842 950572 EXHIBITS 47 THROUGH 71 ARE PHOTOS - PLEASE SEE ORIGINAL FILE Hello